The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1992-08-12 [.[ " COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ! � ry OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 8272&S127 10644 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714)962-2411 August 6, 1992 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS, 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 12, 1992 - 7:30 P.M. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California - The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitatiop Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. Ass stant B001a sretavy Tentatively-Scheduled Upcoming Meetings: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - None Scheduled COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 109GG ELL19 AVENUE PO BOX B127 FOVNIAM VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728 91" 91419624411 I 1 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings August Aug 12, 1992 None Scheduled September Sep 09, 1992 Sep 23, 1992 October Oct 14, 1992 Oct 28, 1992 November Nov 11, 1992** None Scheduled December Dec 09, 1992 None Scheduled January Jan 13, 1993 Jan 27, 1993 February Feb 10, 1993 Feb 24, 1993 March Mar 10, 1993 Mar 24, 1993 April Apr 14, 1993 Apr 28, 1993 May May 12, 1993 May 26 , 1993 June Jun 09, 1993 Jun 23 , 1993 July Jul 14, 1993 Jul 28, 1993 August Aug 11 , 1992 None Scheduled ** Holiday - New meeting date to be determined (Tentatively, November 18, 1992) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS V iq OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA NT28-8127 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 °"1NEE CU"" (714)962-2411 August 26, 1992 NOTICE The adjourned regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, scheduled for August 26 , 1992 at 7 : 30 p.m. , has been cancelled. Penny Kyle Assistant Board Secretary COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1 OBXA ELLIS AVENUE P.0 BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 82128.8121 0141882.2411 August 26, 1992 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Board Members District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 RE: Adjourned Board Meetings to Consider and Act on State Budget Impact on Districts' Revenues As we have previously advised you, the adjourned Board meeting scheduled for August 26, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. to consider and act on state budget impacts on the Districts' revenue has been cancelled. The Governor and the Legislature continue to be at loggerheads and it's anybody's guess as to when they will resolve the State's budget stalemate. Therefore, after consultation with Joint Chairman Mahoney, it was decided not to reschedule the adjourned meeting since the Joint Boards meet regularly anyway, on Wednesday, September 9th. The Fiscal Policy Committee, however, will convene on Wednesday, September 2, 1992 at 5:30 p.m. A notice and meeting material will be sent under separate cover to Fiscal Policy Committee members. In the meantime, if you have any questions lease t hesitate to call me. yne ves aIY' G ral M ger JWS:mas cc: Board Members, Districts 13 and 14 Board Secretary General Counsel COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 0 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA I(M4 EMIS AVENUE August 20, 1992 RO BOX 6127 FOUNTAIN VAUEY,CALIPORNIA 82728.8127 'V 17141962M11 MEMORANDUM TO: Board Members District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 RE: Adjourned Board Meeting - August 26, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. , to Consider and Act on State Budget Impact on Districts' Revenues As we have previously advised you, the adjourned Board meeting to consider and act on state budget impacts on the Districts' revenue has been rescheduled to Wednesday, August 26, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. (See staff reports dated August 13th and 18th.) We have been on the phone with Sacramento almost continuously the past few days and it appears as if a budget agreement is close. However, once again the meeting has been set with the understanding that if a budget agreement is not reached before the 26th, the Board Secretary will contact each Director and advise you whether or not the meeting will be held on the 26th; and further advise you of any rescheduled meeting date that is fixed in anticipation of when budget action might take place by the State. Enclosed is the official notice of the adjourned meeting for Wednesday, August 26th. The Secretary will contact you prior to the meeting time to let you know whether or not this meeting is "on". If you will be difficult to reach by telephone, we would appreciate it if you would call late Tuesday, August 25th or early Wednesday, August 26th, for confirmation. Please ask for Penny Kyle or Mary Simpson, (714) 962-2411, Extension 2026 or 2029, respectively. In the meantime, if you have any questions, ase don't hesitate to call me. #; ayl 4Mager ster JWS:mas Enclosure cc: Board Members, Districts 13 and 14 Board Secretary General Counsel yFp\1�T10,1. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92706-7018 "+pec (714)982-2411 August 20, 1992 NOTICE OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 26, 1992 - 7:30 P.M. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Pursuant to adjournment of the adjourned regular meeting of August 19, 1992, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 Of Orange County, California, will meet in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date to consider and act on the State budget impact on Districts' property tax revenues. AEfSistant EoFa'rd fecPetary I ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 8 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Wednesday, August 19, 1992 - 7:30 P.M. An adjourned regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and it of Orange County, California, was scheduled to be held at the hour of 7:30 p.m., Wednesday, August 19, 1992, at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. There not being a quorum present, the undersigned Assistant Board Secretary adjourned said meeting to Wednesday, August 26, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. Assistant Seq&tary o 1e Boards of Directors f County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California F4.09.1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 19 2, 39 59 6, 79 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON AUGUST 12, 1992 PN\TATION ...r �-1�eiovclllan OveIS^i o N Sfoc. l95e ,� oggNce C013 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on August 12. 1992. at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: / ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: Dan Griset, Chairman x Robert Richardson =Fred Barrera, Chairman pro tem =Gene Beyer Thomas R. Saltarelli x Leslie A. Pontious _Roger Stanton x Con R. Roth _James A. Wahner xNate Reade DISTRICT N0. 2: x Henry W. Wedaa, Chairman John M. Gullixson =John Collins, Chairman pro tom —George Scott =Fred Barrera —Gene Beyer x Buck Catlin —_Chris Norby a Barry DeneS Bob Bell 7--William D. Mahoney —James H. Flora -7--Robert H. Main —Norman Culver Carrey J. Nelson —Glenn Parker a Arthur G. Newton —John 0. Tynes =Iry Pickler —Fred Hunter =Miguel Pulido —Dan Griset _Roger Stanton xDon R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 3: x Sal A. Sapien, Chairman Harry M. Dotson a Burnie Dunlap, Chairman pro tem —Carrey J. Nelson =Buck Catlin —Chris Norby =John Collins —George Scott =Norman Culver —Robert H. Main a James V. Evans —Margie L. Rice =James H. Flora —William D. Mahoney a Don R. Griffin —Rhonda J. McCune =Frank Laszlo —Gwen A. Forsythe =Pat McGuigan —Robert Richardson a Eva G. Miner —Larry Norman -Richard Partin _Cecilia L. Age x Iry Pickier Fred Hunter a Jim Silva —Earle Robitaille _Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth =Charles Sylvia _Ronald Bates DISTRICT NO. 5: a Ruthelyn Plummer, Chai man Evelyn Hart =Phil Sansone, Chairman pro ten —John C. Cox, Jr. =Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 6: James A. Wahner, Chairman x Dick Sherrick a Evelyn Hart, Chairman pro tem —Ruthelyn Plummer -7--Don R. Roth =Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 7: x Charles E. Puckett, Chairman Thomas R. Saltarelli James A. Wahner, Chai man pro tem xNate Reade =Fred Barrera _Gene Beyer =John C. Cox, Jr. Ruthelyn Plummer z Robert Richardson —Miguel Pulido x Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton a Sally Anne Sheridan _Barry Hammond DISTRICT NO. 11: x Grace Winchell, Chairman _Linda Moulton-Patterson a Jack Kelly, Chai man pro tan Don MacAllister _Roger Stanton x Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 13: John M. Gullixson, Chairman x Henry W. Wedaa =Fred Barrera, Chairman pro two —Gene Beyer a William 0. Ehrle _Fred Hunter a Glenn Parker Burnie Dunlap =Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chairman Darryl Miller x Leslie A. Pontious, Chairman pro ten —_Charles E. Puckett x Fred Barrera Gene Beyer z Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton a Sally Anne Sheridan _Barry Hammond -2- 08/12/92 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle, Assistant Board Secretary, Susan Bradford, Corrine Clawson, Mark Esquer, Gary Hasenstab, Ed Hodges, Steve Hovey, John Linder, Margie Nellor, Bob Ooten, Mary Simpson, Jack Vincent, Chuck Winsor OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel , Pervaiz Anwar, Jamel Demir, Mary Lee, Royal S. Radtke, Fred Soronshean, Richard von Langen x x x x x x x x x x x x x DISTRICT 6 In the absence of Chairman James A. Appointment of Chairman pro tem Wahner and Chairman pro tem Evelyn Hart, Director Don R. Roth was appointed Chairman pro tem of District No. 6. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file minute excerpt re Board Appointments That the minute excerpt from the Costa Mesa Sanitary District re appointment of alternate Director for the August 12, 1992 meeting only, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows: District Active Director Alternate Director 1 James A. Wahner Nate Reade ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman welcomed alternate Presentation of District pins to Directors Nate Reade and Dick Directors Sherr1cK, who were representing the Costa Mesa Sanitary District at this meeting. He then presented pins bearing the Districts' logo to these Directors. The pins are similar to the service pins given to employees and recognize the Directors for their service on the Board of the Sanitation Districts. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman recognized Recognition of persons who wish to Mr. Royal S. Radtke, President of the be heard on matters of general Corona del Mar Chamber of Commerce, interest who addressed the Boards regarding a District 5 sewer project in Pacific Coast Highway through the community of Corona del Mar. Mr. Radtke complimented the Districts for a fine job and keeping the ' community together and help the merchants survive during the project. He gave special thanks to Charles Gabbard, Project Inspector, Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering and Director Phil Sansone, Mayor of Newport Beach. Mr. Radtke also commended the Districts for the Memorandum of Understanding that did not allow sewer construction to start in Corona del Mar until Pelican Hill Road, which is now Newport Coast Drive, was in place, which allowed many cars to be diverted from PCH to Newport Coast Drive. -3- 08/12/92 ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported on the Report of the General Manager State budget stalemate still going on in Sacramento. He stated that last month he advised the Directors that the proposal to shift special districts property taxes to the school districts was off the table. Mr. Sylvester noted, however, that it is now back on the table and that the Districts will be affected in some way, between 25% and 100%. He observed that currently there are two proposals on the table that would affect the Districts. The "Super Pat" proposal would put the tax revenue from all special districts in the state in one pot, which totals between $1.641.7 billion. Of that amount, 25% would be appropriated for the schools. The balance would be put into a separate fund and distributed in the same manner as special district augmentation funds are currently distributed in each county. The alternative proposal would take 25-30% off the top of enterprise special districts' tax revenue and appropriate it to the schools. For the Sanitation Districts, 25% of our $35 million 1n property taxes would be just under $9 million that would be shifted to the schools. The General Manager stated that once the budget is passed, its impact on the Districts will require the Boards to meet immediately to consider alternatives including adjusting the user fees to make up for the shortfall . He stated user fees are collected on the property tax bills, and the Districts provide information to the County Auditor for each parcel that the fee is levied against within the Districts' service area. The deadline date, August 10, had been extended to August 24, so timing is of the essence because the Boards will have to act quickly. Following discussion among the Directors regarding the impact of the State's budget proposals on the Districts and alternatives for addressing them, it was determined that the Boards would adjourn this meeting to August 19th, and the Board Secretary could continue adjourning to specific dates until such time as the budget is finally passed and the Directors could then meet to consider appropriate actions. Mr. Sylvester then reported that under the Districts' NPDES permit conditions, the US EPA and Regional Water Quality Control Board require the Districts to submit an annual report of the Districts' activities. He stated that the Executive Summary to the 1991 annual report was recently mailed to the Directors, and he urged the Directors to review it. He also stated additional copies were available upon request. The General Manager then reported that as part of the public outreach program, the Districts participated again this year in the Orange County Fair. One of our exhibits included an interactive computer system where people could take a quiz and, if questions answered correctly, they would receive various prizes. This turned out to be one of the high spots of the fair. He commented that the Districts' participation was successful and that we were able to educate a considerable number of people on our wastewater management program. -4- 08/12/92 DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 8, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 8, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 8, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 8, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 8, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. l ; DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or �••✓ Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 8, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 8, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 8, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 8, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -5- 08/12/92 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual U District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 7/01/92 7/15/92 7129/92 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $1,114,606.29 $ 754,027.41 $1,348,61B.71 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 2,392,924.95 2,737,571.94 3,566,669.69 Joint Working Capital Fund - 176,468.67 172,757.07 135,371.08 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 153,223.35 57,420.76 162,216.51 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 109,781.02 117,282.78 93,624.87 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 5,866.42 15,739.97 45,011.83 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 168,549.26 17,123.89 152,482.24 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 185,160.12 17,612.17 735,744.54 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 417.96 99.65 2,160.85 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 52,940.28 4,443.81 80,088.19 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 926.99 8,159.00 2,657.92 DISTRICT N0. 13 - -0- 24.19 104.72 DISTRICTS - 954,131.81 9,969.45 508,170.06 DISTRICTS 8 6 JOINT - 1,124.69 1,917.20 3,505.22 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 8 7 J INT - 2,263.66 -0- 32.49 DISTRICTS NO . 7 8 14 JOINT 5 541.13 12.08 6,578.48 5,323,926.60 3,914,1 1.37 6,843,037.40 .. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase of Traffic Control Devices, Signholders, Signs That the bid tabulation and and Accessories, Specification recommendation re Purchase of Traffic No. E-216, to J. G. Tucker 8 Son, Control Devices, Signholders, Signs Inc. and Accessories, Specification No. E-216, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the bid of Pacific Safety and Equipment Company, Inc. be, and is hereby, rejected as incomplete; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase order be, and is hereby, awarded to J. G. Tucker 8 Son, Inc. in the total amount of $43,689.24 plus sales tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase and Installation of Fiber 0 tic Network Between New That the Boards of Directors hereby Laboratory and Maintenance adopt Resolution No. 92-104, Operations Control Center, receiving and filing bid tabulation S ecification Na. M-04 , to Sim J. and recommendation and awarding Harris ompany contract for Purchase and Installation of Fiber Optic Network Between New Laboratory and Maintenance/Operations Control Center, Specification No. M-040, to Sim J. Harris Company for a total amount not to exceed $59,223.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -6- 08/12/92 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase of Anionic Polyelectrolyte Chemical Polymer, That the Boards of Directors hereby Specification No. P-132, to Diatec adopt Resolution No. 92-105, Environmental receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Anionic Polyelectrolyte Chemical Polymer, Specification No. P-132, to Diatec Environmental for the price of $.039 per _ pound, plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning September 1, 1992, with provision for four one-year extensions. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS In response to a request for an Awarding Purchase of Caustic Soda explanation of why District No. 3 was Solution, Specification No. P-133, the only District required to pay a to Western States Chemical Supply large portion of the caustic soda Corporation solution cost, the General Manager explained numerous complaints had been received along the route of the large trunk sewers within District No. 3 many years ago. The wastewater within these sewers are coming from as far away as La Habra, taking 35 to 40 hours for some of this wastewater to travel down to Plant No. 2, thus resulting in many odor complaints. At that time a consultant was hired to address this problem. The problem was resolved by caustic soda injections in the upper reaches of the District No. 3 trunk sewers. He added that the study also determined that Plant No. 2 received benefits from adding the chemicals upstream, so District No. 3 is given a credit for the benefit that the jointly owned and operated treatment plant receives, thereby actually reducing costs to District No. 3. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-106, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Caustic Soda Solution, Specification No. P-133, to Western States Chemical Supply Corporation, for the delivered price of $271.88 per dry ton, plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning September 1, 1992, with provision for four one-year extensions, with estimated costs to be shared as follows: Treatment Trunk Plants Sewers Total Joint Districts $326,256.00 $285,474.00 $611,730.00 District 3 Only 285,474.00 285,474.00 $326,256.00 $570,948.00 $897,204.00 Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -7- 08/12/92 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Laboratory services contract for Analyses of sludge, That the bid tabulation and Specification No. 5-065, to recortmendation for Laboratory MacDonald-Stephens Laboratories, Services Contract for Analyses of Inc. Sludge, Specification No. 5-065, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the bids of TBD Environmental Laboratories, C.L. Technology, Inc. and BC Analytical be, and are hereby, rejected for non-compliance with the specifications; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said laboratory services purchase order contract be, and is hereby awarded to MacDonald-Stephens Laboratories, Inc. , in an amount not to exceed $30,750.00, for the period August 13, 1992 to June 30, 1993, with option for four one-year extensions. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Thange Order No. it to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 11 to the plans Job No. J-17 and specifications for Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17, authorizing an addition of $136,617.81 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for two items of additional work, and granting a time extension of 63 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizin staff to issue Chan e Order No. to Purchase Uraer That staff be, and is hereby, No. 37965 issued to Sur-Lite authorized to issue Change Order Corporation for Purchase of Four No. 3 to Purchase Order No. 37965 Waste Digester Gas Flares, Job issued to Sur-Lite Corporation for No. J-21A Purchase of Four Waste Digester Gas Flares, Job No. J-21A, for a reduction of the total authorized amount from $246,960.00 plus sales tax to $238,737.00 plus sales tax, for deletion of electrical termination work and costs due to delays impacting other construction projects. ALL DISTRICTS Director Collins expressed concern Approving Change Order No. 12 to over the quality of the consulting the plans and specifications for engineer for this project causing Job No. J-19-1 numerous change order items because of design errors or omissions. He questioned the cost differential for those items done by change order versus what it would have been if included originally in the plans and specifications. He felt this was performance that should not be rewarded and should be penalized. He also felt that the next time this firm participated in bidding that these types of mistakes be remembered and taken Into account in some fashion. -8- 08/12/92 The Director of Engineering agreed that all of the omissions should have been included in the design contract. He pointed out that it was a very complex job but that that was no excuse. He also agreed that there was a cost differential that was probably higher by change order versus being Included in the original bid, but observed that it was very difficult to assess. Mr. Dawes reviewed the difference between what is called design omissions versus error omissions. He pointed out that in his opinion Item 4 was a consultant error, and they will demand the consultant to pay that amount. He also reviewed the other change order items. In response to Directors' questions regarding plan checking by staff, the Director of Engineering explained that his staff does some plan checks, although they are limited in their ability to do so because of staff resources. Staff is working on improving this situation. Currently, the Districts have hired a second consultant to do a plan check on another extremely complicated design to hopefully avoid, or at least minimize, these types of situations. The Directors then requested that the cumulative totals of change orders be highlighted in future agenda reports. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 12 to the plans and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, authorizing an addition of $51,966.00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation for four items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Gas antlR n ac 'It 1 ies at Rec ama ion Rant N0. 1 ob No. P1- 4-1 Approving Change Order No. 22 to Moved, seconded and duly carried: the plans and specif cat o� ns for Job No. P1-34-1 That Change Order No. 22 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing a net addition of $56,349.33 to the contract with Ziebarth 8 Alper for 14 items of added or deleted work, and granting a time extension of 61 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. Approving Change Order No. 23 to Moved, seconded and duly carried: the lans and s ecif cat ons for ob Na. Fl-J4-1 That Change Order No. 23 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing a net deduction of $61,818.63 from the contract with Ziebarth 6 Alper for four items of deleted work or revised contract provisions, be, and is hereby, approved Accepting Job No. P1-34-1 as Moved, seconded and duly carried: complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-107, accepting Gas Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-1, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -9- 08/12/92 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 12 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 12 to the plans Job Nos. P1-34-3, P1-35-2 and J-21 and specifications for Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-3; Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-2; and Installation of Waste Digester Gas Flare Facilities at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-21, authorizing an addition of $10,336.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. , for two items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 8 to the Professional Services Agreement That the Selection Committee with Brown and Caldwell Consulting certification of the final negotiated Engineers for design of Central fee relative to Addendum No. 8 to the Power Generation Systems re Job Professional Services Agreement with No. J-19 Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for design of Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19, providing for additional inspection and design services, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-108, approving Addendum No. 8 to said agreement with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for said additional services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $292,024.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $4,179,112.00 to an amount not to exceed $4,471,136.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Agreement with J. T. Horvath & Associates for That the Selection Committee specialized cans ruction management certification of the final negotiated antl inspection services re various fee relative to Agreement with r- masteplanned construction J. T. Horvath 8 Associates for projects specialized construction management and inspection services re various master-planned construction projects, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-109, approving said agreement with J. T. Horvath & Associates for said services, on an as-needed basis, for a two-year period beginning October 11, 1992, with option for a one-year extension, at the following hourly rates: ' Agreement Period Rate 10/11/92 - 10/10/93 $39.20 10/11/93 - 10/10/94 40.95 10/11/94 - 10/10/95 42.80 Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -10- 08/12/92 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin Addendum No. Z to the Professional Services Agreement That the Boards of Directors hereby with Martin Kordick, Sr. for adopt Resolution No. 92-110, specialized construction inspection approving Addendum No. 2 to the services re various master-planned Professional Services Agreement with construction projects Martin Kordick, Sr. for specialized ' construction inspection services re various master-planned construction projects, providing for extension of said agreement from August 10, 1992 through December 31, 1992 with no increase in the hourly rate. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate That the Selection Committee be, and a Professional Services Agreement is hereby, authorized to solicit for design and construction proposals and negotiate a services for Job Nos. P1-41 and Professional Services Agreement for P2-48 design and construction services required for Rehabilitation of Clarifiers 3, 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P141, and Rehabilitation of Clarifiers A through Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-48. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing renewal of membership in the Santa Ana River Flood That renewal of membership in the Protection Agency S RFPA Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency (SARFPA) for the 1992-93 fiscal year, be, and is hereby, authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing membership in the Southern California Alliance of That membership in the Southern RPus Owned Treatment Works California Alliance of Publicly Owned TW Treatment Works (SCAPOTW) for the 1992-93 fiscal year, be, and is hereby, authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written report of the Special Joint Works That the written report of the Selection Committee Special Joint Works Selection Committee's meeting re Computers held on July 16, 1992, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving agreement with RJN Computer Services, Inc. , for That the Boards of Directors hereby design and installation of adopt Resolution No. 92-111, Computer-Aided Support ystem for approving agreement with RJN Computer Maintenance Management, Services, Inc. , for design and Specification No. 5-059 installation of Computer-Aided Support System for Maintenance Management, Specification No. S-0599 in the amount of $548,525.00, including applicable taxes. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -11- 08/12/92 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written reports of the Fiscal Policy That the written reports of the Committee and Executive Committee Fiscal Policy Committee and Executive Committee meetings held on July 29, 1992, be and are hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving an Agreement re: Application for S ecif is Plan of That the Boards of Directors hereby Site Use and evelopment with the adopt Resolution No. 92-112, City of Fountain valley at approving an Agreement re: Reclamation Plant No. 1 Application for Specific Plan of Site Use and Development with the City of Fountain Valley at Reclamation Plant No. 1. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 7 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Confirming fees, procedures and policies concerning annexations of That the Boards of Directors hereby territory to the Districts adopt the following resolutions amending Districts' resolutions confirming fees, procedures and policies concerning annexations of territory to the Districts, and foregoing the automatic annexation fee increase for fiscal year 1992-93: 1992 - 93 Confirming Acreage Fee Resolution Resolution w Tax w o Tax Dist. No. No. Exchange Exchange 2 92-113-2 91-113-2 $2,922 $3,908 3 92-114-3 91-114-3 $3,154 $4,139 5 92-115-5 91-115-5 $3,054 $4,084 7 92-116-7 91-116-7 $2,902 $3,883 11 92-117-11 91-117-11 $4,843 $5,830 Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written report of the Conservation, Recycle That the written report of the and Reuse Committee Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee's meeting on July 28, 1992, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported to the General Counsel 's comments Prior to Directors of the need for a closed Closed Session session as authorized by Government Code Sections 54956.9 and 54957.6 to review: 1) Recommendation relative to a Worker's Compensation claim pertaining to an employee. -12- 08/12/92 2) A proposed settlement of litigation entitled, United States Government vs. Montrose Chemical Company, County Sanitation Districts. 3) Proposed initiation of litigation against United Oil Company for damages ; 1 incurred by the Districts as a result of activities of United Oil Company in one of their facilities. 4) Request for authorization to initiate litigation against the manufacturer and general contractor on Districts' two Jobs relating to the co-generation combustion engines. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Convene in closed session pursuant To Government Code Section 54 56.9 The Boards convened in closed session at 8:25 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 and 54957.6. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board(s) of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. ALL DISTRICTS At 9:50 p.m. the Boards reconvened in Reconvene in regular session regular session. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , August 19, 1992. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., August 12, 1992. DISTRICTS 2 8 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: A' rovin A reement with the Garden Grove Agency for Comnuni ty That the Boards of Directors hereby Development adopt Resolution No. 92-118, approving Agreement with the Garden Grove Agency for Community Development, electing a tax increment pass-through relative to an amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the Garden Grove Community Project, in accordance with Districts' policy and pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33676. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Professional Services Agreement with Church Engineering, That the Selection Committee Inc. for design and construction certification of the final negotiated support services for Contract fee relative to the Professional No. 2-9-RI Services Agreement with Church Engineering, Inc. for design and construction support services for Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, from Imperial Highway West of Kraemer Boulevard to the Intersection ' of Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associated Road, Contract No. 2-9-111, be, and Is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 92-119-2, approving said agreement with Church Engineering, Inc. for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct l l expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $119,524.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -13- DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , August 19, 1992. The Chai man then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m. , August 12, 1992. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment ' That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , August 19, 1992. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m. , August 12, 1992. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding contract for Abandonment of Portion of MacArthur Trunk That the Board of Directors hereby Sewer within John Wayne Airport, adopts Resolution No. 92-121-7, Contract No. 7-1B-1, to Colich receiving and filing bid tabulation Bros. , Inc. dba Colich & Sons and recommendation and awarding contract for Abandonment of Portion of MacArthur Trunk Sewer within John Wayne Airport, Contract No. 7-1B-1, to Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons, in the total amount of $62,000.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Actions re Irvine-New ort ubtrunk Relief Sewer, Contract N0. 7-3 -2 �✓ Approving Change Order No. 1 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: l ans and s ecifications for Contract No. 7- E-2 That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Irvine-Newport Subtrunk Relief Sewer, Contract No. 7-3E-2, authorizing an addition of $92,407.00 to the contract with Colich & Sons for seven items of additional work, and granting a time extension of 37 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. Accepting Contract No. 7-3E-2 as Moved, seconded and duly carried: complete That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 92-122-7, accepting Irvine-Newport Subtrunk Relief Sewer, Contract No. 7-3E-2, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifica ions for Contract No. 7-14-1-1 That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 92-123-7, approving plans and specifications for Abandonment of Red Hill Pump Station, Phase 1, Contract No. 7-14-1-1, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -14- 08/12/92 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Reimbursement Agreement with Orange County Flood Control That the Board of Directors hereby District re Contract No. 7-1-2 in adopts Resolution No. 92-124-7, conjunction with OCFCD improvements approving Agreement with the Orange to the Santa Ana-Delhi Channel county Flood Control District, providing for reimbursement of costs to the Flood Control District for Relocation of the District's Gisler-Red Hill Trunk Sewer Siphon under the Santa Ana-Delhi Channel , Contract No. 7-1-2, in conjunction with OCFCD improvements to the Santa Ana-Delhi Channel within the Cities of Tustin, Irvine, Santa Ana, Costa Mesa and unincorporated County territory; and, FURTHER MOVED: That payment of a $55,000.00 deposit for District's portion of said work, be, and is hereby, authorized. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , August 19, 1992. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m. , August 12, 1992. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , August 19, 1992. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., August 12, 1992. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m. , August 12, 1992. DISTRICTS 5 8 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin lags and s ecifications for Contract Nos. 5- 2 and 5- 3 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-120, approving plans and specifications for Improvements to Bitter Point and Rocky Point Pump Stations, Contract No. 5-32, and Improvements to Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: _ Approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 4 to the plans Contract No. 5-34-3 and specifications for Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-34-3, authorizing an addition of $104,000.00 to the contract with Silveri 8 LeBouef for a contract-specified bonus payment for 52 days early completion of certain work, based on the rate of $2,000 per day, be, and is hereby, approved. -15- 08/12/92 DISTRICTS 5, 6 8 14 Actions re Agreement for Purchase of Capacity antl Pa ent of �i Operational and Maintenance Charges relative to San Joaquin Hills Planned Community Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering reported that last year, Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWO) approached District No. 5 regarding the San Joaquin Hills Planned Community (SJHPC) presently undergoing development by The Irvine Company. The SJHPC lies partly within District No. 5 and partially within District No. 14 with an island between the boundaries of Districts 5 and 14. This area was originally intended to be a part of District No. 14 but was inadvertently overlooked during the original formation of District 14. The annexation of this area to District No. 14 would be processed separately at a future date. Mr. Dawes further reported that the SJHPC development could best be served locally by IRWD wastewater collection facilities; however, there are no transmission facilities owned by either IRWD or District No. 14 which could deliver flows to IRWD's Michelson TreatmentPlant. Delivery to the Districts' Joint Treatment and Disposal Facilities would require use of District Nos. 5 and 6 sewer lines by District No. 14. If the proposed agreement is approved, IRWD's local collector system would deliver flows to the regional collection facilities of District Nos. 5 and 6. \� He further stated that in order to best accommodate flows from SJHPC, an agreement had been prepared which provides for District 14 to purchase between 4% and 5% capacity in the District 5 and 6 trunk system, and for District Nos. 5, 6 and 14 to share in the operation and maintenance costs of the sewers. The estimated "buy-in" cost is $1,389,129.97. The "buy-in" cost to District 14 for existing facilities is $878,729.97, the payment of which will be divided between District 5 ($855,400.03) and District 6 ($23,340.94), based on their proportionate ownership of existing capacity. The balance of the payment will be similarly divided when the future facilities are completed, at which time District 14 will pay an estimated $518,300.00 to District 5 and $1,100.00 to District 6. The Director of Engineering also reported that within the SJHPC, north of the District 5 boundary, is a portion of the "Downcoast Area" for which IRWD paid connection fees as part of Annexation No. 7 to District No. 5. Included in the proposed agreement is a provision to refund to IRWD funds incorrectly paid to District 5 for connection fees on properties located outside of District No. 5. Connection fees for 509 residential units, which are now planned to be built in SJHPC within District No. 14, were paid to District No. 5 at the capital facilities charge of $1,500.00 per residential unit. Therefore the sum to be refunded by District No. 5 to IRWD is $763,500.00. -16- 08/12/92 Mr. Dawes stated that the agreement provides an economical way to serve this area without IRWD being forced to build costly lines to the Michelson Reclamation Plant, with Districts 5 and 6 having adequate capacity within their lines to support this sale, and staff recommended approval of this agreement. A brief discussion followed in response to a question by Director Sherrick regarding the advisability of District No. 6 selling reserve capacity in its system to accommodate the proposed arrangement. Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried: dated August 39 1 92 That the Staff Report dated August 3, 1992 re proposed Agreement for Purchase of Capacity and Payment of Operational and Maintenance Charges relative to San Joaquin Hills Planned Community, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Approving Agreement for Purchase of Moved, seconded and duly carried: Capacity and Payment of Operational and Maintenance Charges relative to That the Boards of Directors San Joaquin Hills Planned hereby adopt Resolution Community JHPC No. 92-125, approving Agreement for Purchase of Capacity and Maintenance Charges relative to San Joaquin Hills Planned Community (SJHPC) among Districts Nos. 5, 6 and 14 and the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD), providing for the purchase by District No. 14 of capacity in transmission facilities owned by Districts 5 and 6, and providing further for the reimbursement by District No. 5 to IRWD of a prior overpayment of connection charges relative to properties within the SJHPC. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. 1 DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: �wr Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , August 19, 1992. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:05 p.m. , August 12, 1992. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., August 19, 1992. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:05 p.m., August 12, 1992. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:05 p.m. , August 12, 1992. As stant Se tar f the Boards -- of Directors f County Sanitation 1 Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 -17- FUND NC 9199 JT GIST WCRMING CAPITAL ` PROCESSING DATE 6/25/92 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS TA10 07/01/92 POSTING DATE O7/01192 WARRANT MG. VERCOP AMOUNT DESCRIPTION _ _.__. ._.._.- 122993 ASK ANALYSIS $960.00 S OIL ANALYSIS 12299 A T t T f2.934.56 LONGONG D DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES--- -- I229 5 AMEP ICAN TELEPHONE t TELEGRAPH i1.505.68 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 12299696 A 1 t T f150.00 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE eEgVIC69 122998. ACCU•LROD RESEARCH INC- I 015.00 - LAB AGREEMENT - - ---- ------- 122998 AIR PRODUCTS A CHEMICAL IN $11.439.03 OEM AGREEMENT CRY G8N SY9T. M.O.8-9-89 12299E NORCO INCAIR FILTER INC f1$522.00 MECHANICAL PARTS 123000 A09C0 IN t/OP AYCPICAN SEALS 3522.22 MECHANICAL PARTS- - - - -- ----- 123001 AYFRICAR SIEYe 1440.25 1"METERSUPPLIES PARTS 123003 AYCRECAN 11PE CUL/USE C IN .026.25 LAB GENCY 123004 - CHARLES _SCALD .CONSTRUCTION f16.026.TB EMERGENCY SEWER IREPAIRS DIST-9---- ---- 12300A CNARCCS E. ECHANDERSON 3290.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 123006 A-PLUSY•5 MACH 3 MACHINE. INC. .20 .26 SHAFT REPAIPS 123006 A•PL US STSTEIE il1235.00 NOTICES b ADS EE - - -- --- 1230GT ABC LABCPISTRUM 3235.00 INSTRUMENT AGREEMENT 12300E ASIOCIA INSTRUMENT ENI .100.00 IOIL TESTING PARTS 123010 - - -ASSOC. TEO SOILS ENGINEECONSULTANTS - .. $3.100.00 - MEDICAL TESTING ADMINISTRATOR -- - fTl 123011 ASSOC. ADPINI S. f CORSUL IANIb .540.00 MEDICAL CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR X 12l011 ASSOC. IIYIN f CONSULT. fT$150.00 EMPLOYEE PRESCRIPTION CARDS 2 12_012 ASSOC ACMINIS t CONS LL TAM IS $750.00 EMPLOYES EPRESCRIPTION STRATI CARDS - PRINTING- CO 123024 AMSA 3T50.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 12301E AUTO SHOP INDUSTRIES EQUIPMENT CO $2$39 .6 TRUCE IC PA 12301E -- AU]OCCN INDUSTRIES - INC - 3350.59 WARD IL PARTS---- ---- 1 123016 AL ARCS L ]PALM TES 350.5E AWARD PLAQUES 1 123017 BE ANSAFETYAL 33•720.00 LAB TYPSUPP9 123019 BRY SAFETY 3 SUPPLY _. _. . 339.9E _ SAFETY SUPPLIES.__ 12301E BACNFLOV CONTROLS COMPANY DEVICE 3128.00 BACRFLOM TESTING 123021 BAILEY CONTROLS CO NP ANY 3136.7E TOLL 123022 BANANA BLL EPRIMT f1S600.A2. _ BLUEPRINTING M.0.1R..BUTIO- 12l022 B P.ITEY IR .834.51 BATTERIES COMP DISTRIBUTION 123023 BATIIRY SPECIALTIES f1.036.51 I" SRIBS 12302E _ BAYTES CIJEKCSTICS INC 3T.0l6.T1 _ ._ _ LAB SUPPLIES 123026 RAYLESS STATIONERS 349.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123026 ROBEPT BE IN VI LL INN FROST 1B00.00 ENGINEERING 88RVICE9 5-33 123027 - J t H BCRGC .INC 9619.66 .- .- TRUCKSUPPLIES. 12302E VT BAD LPC INC 1629.90 In SUPPLIES PARTS 12301E ETC•RAD LIECRA TLC ITS $156.61 LAB RE 1230l0 . BOL R7LChONI ITT, INC 1285.00 COMPUTE AGREEMENT__.. 123031 DOLTRONIS DATA MAINTENANCE .445.49 COMPUTER DATA -19- MAINTENANCE 123032 BRINGER SON COUP $U.225.96 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 121G33 . BRCYA 3 [ALCWCLL CONSULllh4 f26$241.98 ._ _. ENGINBBRING BERVICS9 123035 BUSH AND ASSOCIAT fN1.TS SURVEYING 123036 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES INC S2.604.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-12-91 _ 223036 _ GAMY G _ STREEO 18.411.12 _ PETTY CASH AEIMBVR98N8NT. _ - 12303T BUTLER PAPER COMPANY f562.78 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123038 C t S CONYLNICATIONS 392.2E OFFICE 9UPPLI68 FUND NO 9199 JT DIST RIMMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/25/92 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBCR AP43 - - -- -- - .. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNT? - - -- - -- .-- CLAIMS PAID 07/0U92 POSTING DATE 07/01/92 RARRA61_NO. _- _ . . .. . VENDOR- - AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 123039 C M 1 $488.97 ELECTRIC PARTS 123040 CS CCMPANY $1.679.73 VALVE - --. —- 123091 CALIRCL INC $379.78 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 123042 CALIFCRRIA ALIC CCLLISICR INC 51.321.56 TRUCK REPAIRS 123043 . .. CALIFCRNIA AUTOPATIC GATE 1297.1V SERVICE AGREEMENT 123049 CA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 51.023.42 COOPERATIVE BIOASSAY RESEARCH 123049 JOHN CAROLED ENGINEERS 1130.992.02 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-30, PI-20 123046 CENILRY SAFETY INS? S SUPF $16.662.04 SAFETY SUPPLIES 123047 CERTIFIED LAECRATORIES $300.00 LUBE OIL 123048 C6EMICAL ABSTRACTS SERVICE $390.00 SUBSCRIPTION 123049 CHCVRON USA INC $5.345.78 OIL 123050 CITY WIRE CLOTH INC $17.31 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 123051 COLICH ARC SCNS SI.B94.093.80 CONSTRUCTION I-9 123052 CCMPLSA. INC. 92.162.22 COMPUTER HARDWARE/SOFTWARE . _. --____. 123053 CCRNELL 6M PARTS / DIV $127.50 TRUCK PARTS 323954 CON-RAY LESTERN ENFRESS $79.49 FREIGHT m 123855 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST 17.581.91 ELECTRIC SUPPLIE9 - X 123056 CCNTAINERIZED CHEMICAL DISPC $190.00 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL Z 123057 CCNIIAENIAL AIR TOILS INC 13.742.09 TOOLS �-+ 1230ES CCN7IAERIIL . CNEMICAL CC $4.840.75 CHLORINE M.O.10-19-91 _. w 123059 CONE-LABS $1.350.00 LAS SUPPLIES 123060 COSTA MESA AD TO SUPPLY $927.54 TRUCK PARTS . 123061 STATE OF CALIF ORRIN 518.667.00 SALES TAX PAYMENT._-__ a 123062 DAILY PILOT $50.00 NOTICES 6 ADS 1 12l0f3 CAPES E Mf CA[ 155.003.19 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-30-3 N 123CEo J.L. [-A1f ELC [C INC 52.122.68 PIPS 123065 CANCELS TIRE SERVICE S43.64 TIRES 123066 DATA STORM 976.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 123067 PETER C DAVID CO $136.387.80 CONSTRUCTION 3-29-2. 123068 DESURIN AND/CR CS CO $1.940.60 VALVES 1230E9 DIATEC ENVIRCRPENTAL $2.264.26 CHEMICALS M.O.10-9-91 123070 OIFILIPPC ASSOCIATES $54.95 PRINTING 123071 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP 156.815.84 COMPUTER NETWORK SERVICES M.O.1-9-92 123072 SYCON CORP S146.93 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123073 DIVERSIFIED INSPECTION $8.785.31 CRANE MAINTENANCE_. _ 12307E DCPACC IRTERFRISES INC $16.278.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS 121075 CLAN ECVPCS CCMP $3.818.73 PAINT SUPPLIES 123076 OURO-SENSE CORP 1799.6V . MECHANICAL PARTS.... . - 123077 DRYER INSTRUMENT INC $940.55 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 123078 D-YALS SALES $299.13 FITTINGS 123079 EASIPAN INC $5,198.06 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123080 ECCARALYSIS INC $5.594.59 OCEAN MONITORING H.O.7-17-91 123081 ECLARCS M16H VACLLM INTER. $1.708.56 LAB SUPPLIES 123002 ELECTRO ALMERICS INC $1,518.01 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES _-, ..._ _ 123083 ENCHANTER INC 92.940.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.7-17-91 123084 ENSECO-CALLAB $2.680.00 LAB SUPPLIES FURS NC 9199 JT DIST NCRMIAG CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/25/92 PAGE ] REPORT NUMBER AP/3 .. . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY . .. ._. _. CLAIMS PAID O11OI192 POSTING DATE 07/01/92 WARRANT NC. _ . VEhCOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION . 123085 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSCC 11.089.56 LAB SERVICES ....12308E _ ... EXCELLENCE IN TRAINING $946.00 PUBLICATION _. .. .- 123087 MARSHALL FRINGES 9178.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 123008 JCRN B FALNERSTEIN PE $3.400.00 CONSTRUCTION 88RVIC88 I-9. 1-I6 - 123089_. FECEPAL [NIP[$$ CCRP 3370.25 AIR FREIGHT _ - 223090 FERRELLEAE $153.09 PROPANE 123091 FILTER SUPPLY CO $514.34 CHLORINATION PARTS 123092 FISCHER G PORTER CO 370/.38 CHLORINATION PARTS . . .,.._.. 123093 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CC 91,057.73 LAB SUPPLIES 123094 FISOhS INSTRUPENIS $18.388.50 LAB EQUIPMENT 123055 - FLC.SVSIEPS $333.92 PLUMBING BUPPLI68 123096 FCADES CCPPUTEP GROUP INC $9,862.36 COMPUTER SYSTEMS 223097 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $35.21 FILM . 123090 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $1.620.00 HAZARDOUS MASTS DISCLOSURES _ ... 123099 FCUNTAIh VALLEY PAINT 3570.56 PAINT SUPPLIES 123100 FIN ENTERPRISES $1,825.00 SAFETY CONSULTANT rri 1233C1 - - . FIX .IhOLSIPIAL SALES $103.70 PAINT SUPPLIES X 123162 ThE FOXBCRO CO 393.7E ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 2 123103 PRESSOR BY SUPPLY $39.90 TRUCE PARTS ^� 123104 BUD FREY 171.16 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 123105 BIG SERVICE $163.58 LAB SUPPLIES 123106 GAhAhL LLPSER CO 9260.71 HARDNAR6/LUMBER 1231C7 GALGE REFAIR SERVICE $377.04 INSTRUMENT RBPAIH n 123108 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CC. 1948.62 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 1 123109 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO $4.338.75 TELEPHONE SERVICES W 123110 GENOSTS BIOTECHNOLOGIES 23.077.75 LAB BUPPLI68 123112 LIFE TECHPCLOGIF.S/6IBCO/B RL 1121.12 LAB BUPPLI68 123112 GIEPLICM•PITCHELI INC 115 S443.13 MECHANICAL PARTS 12311] .DAVIGRAPDIR CIRIFFEU1IP5 .000.00 FILM 123111 OA VID R. GRIFFIN f9.000.00 LEGAL BSRVIC88 123115 H9 TYPE L GRAPHICS 310.7E OPTICS BUPPLI68 123116 .GELD GE T HALL CO 31.690.0E MOTORS I23118 MAED A PFR PEP $1.006.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 12311E HARRIAGTCA IACUEERIAI iLASIi 22.000.00 PLUMBING BUPPLIBB 123120 HAUL AWAY -S SO INCs2.$83.00 TRASH REMOVAL 123121 E6 HELLEP.S SON I 383.02 TOOLS 123121 HOERAIGER CVS ASSOC.CALIFINC .000.00 MECHANICAL PARTS 223122 J.T. NORVS IN [ ]SOC. fS.000.00 CONSTRUCTION 88RVIC88 J-23c1, a-17 _ 123324 PS HU GL E<, CC IAC f216.97 PAINT BUPPLI68 123125 CITY OF hlVALLG/Ck HBEAC�MINN i11$172.18 WATER E P 123126 HCC INSTRUMENT ENLLCT SCHYINN C f172.73 BICYCLE PARTS 12312E ILL INDUSTRIAL $/6.7] CHEMICALS 123127 I.G. INDUSTRIAL CORP. 32.133.87 CHEMICALS ...123129_. .. IMPERIAL .NEST CHEMICAL3]22389.32 FERRIC CHLORIDE N.0.11c19c94 123130 IA•Cltf ALCMI"EADE6 INCAC $246.96 JANITORIAL BUPPLI68 1231]0 INCUS7P Ul ThREA OEO PRODUCTS 3216.9E CONNBC[0R8 FUND NC 9199 - JT GIST 6CRKING CAPITAL PPOCESSING UATE 6/25/92 PAGE A REPORT NUMBER AP43 -.-.__. . .. CCUh TV SANITATION DISTRICTS OF CRINGE COUNTY _.. .. . ._ ..__ CLAIMS PAID 07/01/92 POSTING DATE OT/Ol192 WARRANT NO.' . VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 123131 INCRAF PIPER $2.555.60 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123122 Ih7ERROLhTAIN SCIENTIFIC CORI $7.080.12 LAB SUPPLIES _- 123113 INSTRUMENT SPECIALISTS 57.09D.00 LAB SUPPLIES 123134 J 6 M SERVICE 2117.40 TRUCK PARTS . 123139.. J 6 W SCIENTIFIC. .. $552.20 LAB SUPPLIER 123136 GREAT NESTERR SANITARY SUPP $999.83 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 1231F7 JAY-S CAIEPIRC 5662.29 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSES 123138 JET FCRF CORP. 5518.06 COMPUTER SOFTWARE ..__. 123139 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 5060.22 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 123140 KARLEE COMPANY $339.27 PAIMT SUPPLIES 1231/1 KELLEY BLLE BOCK S137.92 SUBSCRIPTION 123342 NIhG BEAMING IRC $588.45 MACHINE SUPPLIES 123143 MACY IKCLSTRIAL . SUFFLTIS $1.854.99 TOOLS 123191 MARTIK K(RDICO SR 31.993.75 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 123145 LEEWARD SHELVING 9 FILE SYS. 1191.90 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123146 LIFECOM-SAFETY SERVICE SUPPL S110.19 SAFETY SUPPLIES 123147 LIMITOROUE CORP $2.926.46 - MECHANICAL REPAIR . ._.... __.. ....___._. rn 123148 KP LINCSIRCM IhC $2.945.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - NPDES -PERMIT X 123149 SCCC-LVKC1 CCPP $503.40 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES � 123150 MCT BICLCCIC CCFPARY 3245.76 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT GO 123151 SUSAN MURCOTT $3.242.45 CONSULTING SERVICES - ENVIRONMENTAL 123152 MPS $220.31 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 1231!3 MACOPCO $728.84 INSTRUMENT 1231l9 MAINTENANCE PROCUCTS IAC $2.353.56 MECHANICAL PARTS n 1231!5 FIAT EK 5211.10 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES t 12315E MARVAC ELECTRONICS 567.95 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES __ __. .. ... 323357 MATT CMLOR INC $3.176.52 CHLORINATION PARTS 123158 MEASUREMENT CONTROL SYS INC S420.O4 INSTRUMENT PARTS 123359 MECIIAKICIL SEAL AEFAIR $151.31 PUMP PARTS 123160 PICRIAGE CF CERRITCS $741.41 INSTRUMENT PARTS 121111 PICIAV PFL 9 PACHIhIhG 118.821.62 MECHANICAL PARTS 123162 MITC"LL INTERNATIOKAL IKC $116.31 PUBLICATION 123163 MITCHELL PACIFIC CONSTRUCTORS $26.160.38 CONSTRUCTION 7-12-2 123164 JAMES M MONTGOMERY $4.756.21 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.12-12-90 123165 MCNTGCMERY LABORATORIES $15.537.00 LAB SERVICES. _. .. 123166 KUSTAAG URITS COPPANV S2I3.00 HARDWARE 323167 RAII(RAL SAhITAPY SUFFLY 9218.09 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 123168 . NEWARK ELECTRONICS $760.95 ELECTRIC SUPPLIER 123169 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $12.15 WATER USE 123170 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $678.86 REINEURSABLN SAFETY GLASSES 123171 OFFICE PAVILION/INTERIOR RES $62.92 OFFICE FURNITURE . , _ -_ ... _. . .... 123172 OR SYSTEPS CC $17.564.37 CHLORINE M.0,10-10-91 123173 OPERATIOK TECHNOLOGY IRE $850.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 123174 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C $274.36 TRUCK PARTS 123175 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO $2.797.12 CHEMICALS 123176 ORANGE VALVE 6 FITTING CC. $2.195.75 PLU1®ING SUPPLIES fUNO N0. 9199 JT OIST WORKING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/25/92 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP/3 .. ._.. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/01/92 POSTING DATE 07/01/92 WARRANT NO. VEROOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION .. . . __. _.. . 123177 OXYGEN SERVICE $6.119.58 SPECIALTY GASSES 12317E COUNTY OF ORANGE $6.502.9/ MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT .. . _.- .. 123179 CSCOC SELF-FUKDFO FEOICAL 1 $100,099.00 SELF-FUNDED HEALTH PLAN PREMIUM ADVANCE 123190 CCLNIV S/KITITICK CIS7PTC1 $4.2/5.22 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE 123181 PACE MEPEERSI P WAREHOUSE $45.00 MEMBERSHIP F88 ....._ .____. 123182 PACIFIC ENERGY RESOURCES SI03.000.00 OIL WELL ABANDON/CLEAN-UP M.O.10-9-91 123183Y PACIFIC PARTS $4.3/3.69 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 12318/ PACIFIC - SAFETY EGUIPMENT CC $65.98 SAFETY SUPPLIES 12318E PACIFIC EELL $669.96 TELEPHONE SERVICES 1231EE PACIFIC LILK•lh PEDICAL 0980.00 MEDICAL EXAMS 123187 PACTEL PEPIDIAN SYSTEMS $9.609.19 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS_..__.._..._ 123188 PAK WEST 51.101.15 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 123189 PARAGON CABLE $46.78 CABLE SERVICES 123190 PARTS URLIMITEO 51.336.09 TRUCK PARTS 1231SI - ACT FEWC[POPAFT $460.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 123192 PEkKIK-ELDER CORPORATION 11,906.25 LAB SUPPLIES m 123193 PERNA , PURE PRODUCTS INC 389326*60 . INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES . X 123194 PETLAND PAVILION $96.81 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 2 123195 PICK6ICM PAPER 367.88 OFFICE SUPPLIES 223196 PUPA SAC SYSTEMS INC 5110.607.22 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5-8-91 123197 PICKIER SPIN 517.471.90 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 5-34-3 -E 123198 PITNEY BCNES $183.38 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 123199 POLYMETRICS. INC. S954.50 EQUIPMENT RENTAL. n 123200 POLYPURE INC 921.770.2/ CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 123201 PCSIIIVE FCRMULATORS. INC. $242.30 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES 1232C2 PRECIS![% INDLSIRICS 924.81 _ FITTINGS 123203 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $196.00 ICE 12320/ PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. $4.269.00 SOIL TESTING 123205 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. 51.720.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECPIOR 123206 PRO LAB DIAGNCSTICS $230.9/ LAB SUPPLIES 123207 A9UA-CHEF. IRC 51.630.71 BOILER PARTS 1232CB SIEVE P. IILLS. IRC. $1.0/9.287.00 CONSTRUCTION 14-1-1A-2 6 1-16 123269 RAIKIR INSTRUFENT CO $685.06 LAB SUPPLIES 123218 RECI'C INC $42,955.99 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.7-13-91 123211 RED LINE ENTERPRISE 2620.00 _ .. . . STREET SWEEPING------. 123212 RED NIAC SHIES 5331.87 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES /23213 AEC! EYPFESS $97.65 MESSENGER SERVICES 123211 ThE RCEISTER $682.50 NOTICES 3 ADS -- 123215 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $2.727.58 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 12321E RESTEK CORP $726.31 LAB SUPPLIES 123217 - ROBIKSOK FERTILIZER CO $495.67 __ GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES____._.__ 123218 RCREPCUhIIL%ILCC $1.515.64 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 123219 PEGGY RLPF 5510.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 123220 JOSEPH T RTCRSCK S SCN IN 11,891.66 METAL _- 123221 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP 22/2.25 PARTS CLEANER 123222 SANTA FE IKDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $3.683.32 PLUMBING SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST VCRKIhG CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/25/92 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/01/92 POSTING DATE 07/01/92 WARRANT NO. VEROOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 123223 SCIENCE APPLICATIDNS INT.L 1245007.62 OCEAN MONITORING H.O.6-12-91 12322E . . SCCT1 CCPFANY $3.065.89 TRUCK SCALE REPLACEMENT M.0.5-8-91 123225 SEA COAST DESIGNS $110.93 OFFICE SUPPLIES 12322E SEAVEh1LRIS $1.128.50 OCEAN MONITORING 123227 . SERPEKTIV COhVEYCR . .CORP 22.091.02 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 123228 SEVER EQUIP CC Of AMERICA $1.383.63 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 123229 SHAMROCK SCIENTIFIC SPEC SYS 5120.44 LAB SUPPLIES _ 123230 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $133.01 TOOLS . .. _ .... _ 123231 SMASTA ELECTRIC 5491.74 ELECTRIC BERVICES 123212 Sh LRELUCM SALES $5.775.92 TOOLS/HARDWARE .. 123233 ._ _ .. SIGNN ChEPICAL CD $421.27 LAB SUPPLIE9 123234 SILVERI S LE ROUEF $157.247.10 CONSTRUCTION 5-34-3 123235 SNYPARK VALK-IN MEDICAL CLI 3674.O0 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EVANS - -123236 SMITH-EPERY CO ST46.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-17-91 123237 SP RP RIFE A SUPPLY INC $1.072.55 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 12323B SCAN E KSCHElh KAIN A RCSENTN $455.00 LEGAL SERVICES - PERSONNEL 123239. SCUTh COAST WATER 587.50 WATER USE m 123240 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO $316.235.46 POWER X 123241 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO SB.5I2.91 DIESEL/UNLEADED FUEL _ . .123242 WESTALLCY INC $1.640.41 MELDING SUPPLIES. 123243 SPECIAL FLASTIC SYSTEPS INC 51.093.49 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 121244 SPECIRUP-ILPAB RESCURCE SYS $900.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION -1 123245 SPER IhOLSTRIES INC $719.14 LAB SUPPLI68 -_.-._- a 123246 STANCO-S VACUUM SERVCE $1.144.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 1 113247 STARNA CELLS. INC. $314.77 1" SUPPLIES QI _125240.. STATEWICE INSTALLERS.._. S1.9119.99 _ MOVING BERVICES -.LAB0RAT0RY.,EQIIIP___ 123249 SIERLINE ART $195.01 OFFICE SUPPLI68 323250 STROPBOlhE PRINTING $944.97 PRINTING 123251 .. SUNSET_. FORD . _.._.. S33T.00.. _ .TRUCK 123252 SUPER CHER CORP $1,209.55 CHEMICALS 1232l3 SUPER TECI REFERENCE GUIDE 974.85 PUBLICATION ....123251 _ .. .. ._. SUPERIOR 16TERLOCK CCRP $87.33 _ _ HARDWARE _ 1212'_5 TAVLCR IhILS7PIAL SCFTWANE $2.387.02 TRAINING REGISTRATION 123256 TEXAS CCMPERCE BARK $10.731.61 C.O.P. ADMINISTRATIVE PEE __.123257 __._ THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL.SUPPLY. _ 564.68 .. MECHANICAL SUPPLIES_.._.— ..— I2325B THOMSON TECHNOLOGY. INC. S205.42 ELECTRIC PARTS 123259 TOhV-S LICK A SAFE SERVICE $602.07 RE-KEY LOCKS ....123260. . _ . ..TRAVEL TFAVEL SI28.00 TRAVEL SERVICES N•Q•6r13cPl 123261 TRUCM A AUTC SUPPLY INC S341 TRUCK PARTS 123262 TRUESDAIL LABS 5130.00 ASBESTOS TESTING 123263 -TUSTIN . DODGE $43.11 _ . TRUCK PARTS 123264 TWINING LABORATCRIES OF $9.147.00 PIPE INSPECTION 123265 URISA $80.00 SUBSCRIPTION . .1212E6 - ULTRA SYSIEPI $1.862.51 . ENGINEeRING. SERVICSS _ 123267 UNION BANK 52.906.70 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 7-11-2 123268 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $600.06 PARCEL SERVICES FUND At 9199 J1 DIST WCRMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/25/92 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER APA3 . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY - - -.. . .._._.._. .._._.___ CLAIMS PAID 07/01/92 POSTING DATE 07/01 I92 .WARRANT NO. - - VEADOR. _ AMOUNT - - DESCRIPTION 122269 VWR SCIEATIFIC $4,903.10 LAB SUPPLIES 123270 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO •1.916.63 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 123271 VALUEWARE 5189.10 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 123272 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS $695.19 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123973. VAR UA AAALYIICAI INSTRUPENTS $3,506.97 LAB SUPPLIES. 123214 VARNER ACCLSTICS, IAC. 5510.T9 BUILDING MATERIALS 123275 VIMI AS IAOUSTRIAL SUPPLY 536.03 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 123276 CARL -WARREN L CO 1314.18 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR ..... _._.__ 123277 M.M. WAIT$ CO 5363.39 ELECTRIC PARTS 123278 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $29,435.44 CAUSTIC SODA M.D.$-8-90 123279 WESCC 934.14 ELECTRIC SUPPLIER 123280 RCUNNE $ SCODRUFF S CR $83,512.13 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-19-92 123281 XEROX CORP 51.248.0E COPIER LEASES 123282 GEORGE YARDLEY CO 5176.71 VALVES _ . . _. 193243 RAT S YCLNG $5.400.00 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 123284 RICHARD E ECCAR $200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION ................. rn X TOTAL CLAIMS PAID U7/Ol/92 95.323.926.60 CO - SUMMARY . .. - _. AWOVNT - _ - __.._ _. _. ___:__. a 1 RI OPER FUND $1,511.89 V N1 OAP PAC FUND -- - -- - - - -- -- - - 61$5,165.13 99 R2 OPEN FUND F5$700.43 02 PE FAC FUND ,614 .46 - - R3 OPER FUND ._ _ -... _._.. _ ._.. . 620.614 A6 43 CAP FAC FUND $147,934.80 R5 OPEN FUND $6,524.55 - -45 CAP PAC FUND -_. . . _ . . ._ $176,635.57 R6 OPER FUND $417.96 47 OPEN PUND $19,683.90 _ -47 CAP FAC FUND - _.. _. .._ . $33,256.38 411 OPER FUND $926.99 N14 OPER FUND $954,132.81 45660PER-PUND.. _ . _ _ .. . . $1,109.71. R566 CAP FAC FUND $14.98 4667 OPEN FUND $2,263.66 __.. 47614 OPEN FUND -____ . _. _. _. _. _.. _._ -$5,541.13 _ .__.__.. .._ ___ ._. ___.__.. .- . ._ ___-....._.-__.. JT OPER FUND $1,114,606.29 CORP $2,392,924.95 _-_._SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS. .. ._._. _-. _ _ _ . $253,223.35 JT WORKING CAPITAL $176,468.67 _______________ ___ $5,323,926.60 -. . FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/09/92 PAGE l REPORT NUMBER AP43 .COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/15/92 POSTING DATE 07/15/92 WARRANT NO. _. VENDOR AMOUNT _ DESCRIPTION 123311 NAG SYSTEPS f649.73 INSTRUMENT PART 123312 . AS TECH CCPPARY _ $62.894.07 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 ---- 123313 AIR COPPLRAIICR $1.884.98 GAUGE 123314 ASTN $5.00 PUBLICATION .123315_ _ _ RP ..ADAMS.. COMPANY _. .. ... 81026.70 _ FLANGE - - -- ------- --- 123316 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS INC f1.573.214.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-34-3, P1-35-2 123337 AIR PRODLCTS 6 CHEMICAL IN $33.630.00 CAN AGREEMENT ORY GEN SYST. M.0.8-9-89 _ 123318 . . _. ALTI RCEEIhS ._ _ _ _ . . f49].10 INSTRUMENT SUPP.LI88_.._ . 123319 ALTSCPUL LPCLF CCRP 3231.00 PUBLICATION 123320 ACORDIA BEREF IT SERVICES $14.000.00 ANNUAL AGGREGATE PREMIUM 123321- -__AMERICAR_. INSTITUTE_OE_-.__.._. _ _ . ... _ . _ $45.00_. ...._ ._..___ _PUBLICATION 123322 AMERICAN MEDIA INC f393.95 PUBLICATION 123323 - RCRCO IKC 8/CR AFERICAN SEALS 2986.28 HARDWARE 123324_ .. .. _.. APERICAN EIGPA __. _. _ _. .. _ .- 51:508.49 .. _ INSTRUMENT PARTS . .... .___-_- -_ 123325 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION f30.750.00 MANHOLE ADJUSTMENTS DIET 2 123326 BLAME P ANDERSON 992.00 CELLULAR TELEPHONE REIMBURSEMENT -123327 ANTHCNT!S_NECH.E_SACRINE"11C. ._.___- . ._._ _.f42T.50_.__ ___-. _-MECHANICAL-REPAIRS_ 123328 A-PLLS S137EFS f1.907.19 NOTICES A ADS X 123329 ABATER SERVICES INC $6.538.76 UNIFORM RENTALS 2 _..123337_-.__. .__.ARI20N/_ INSTRUMENT__- _. ._.. .. ._ $101.25 _ _ . ___. .INSTRUMENT PARTS. 123331 ARM TECHNOLOGIES $1.920.00 CONSULTING SERVICES to 123332 ARROA 1R LCM BODIES A EQUIP 111.284.3B TRUCK PARTS -123333._ _. .-__/RT_._60RM S_. . _....._.___.___._____.__. . _ . . _... ._ . .. 1197.31 _.._ ._____._.__.._PHOTO, PROCESSING.--._.__- 123334 DENTAL IRSLRARCE CONSULT. S24.00 DENTAL INSURANCE CONSULTANT 123335 RALPH V ATKINSON 9146.47 PUMP PARTS _123336.. _ _._ BF] PORTABLE TABLE SCRVICE S.. . ... .. .. ..... . .flOT.iS __ _ .. _. _. _. BGVIPMENT RENTALS___....___..._._.._.-_ 123337 BAV SAFETY I SUPPLY f777.90 SAFETY SUPPLIES. 123338. SACMFLOV PREVENTION DEVICE $32.00 BACKFLOW TESTING _-_123339 _. '_._....__SALL 16_CCRSIRLCT ICS_C0. _._ . ___ _.S7.535.00___. _ __.. ._ __.- MANHOLE ADJUSTING_DIBT_3___ 123340 EAKANA BLIEPRINT 16.461.97 BLUEPRINTING H.O.10-10-90 123341 BARCLAYS LAW PUBLISHERS $52.21 PUBLICATION - .12]342-_ .._.... BATTERY SPECIALTIES 4661.25. .. ._ _... _BATTERIES . . 123343 BARTER DIAGNOSTICS INC $4,849.27 LAB SUPPLIES 123344 BAYLISS STAIICNERS $25.98 OFFICE SUPPLIES __123345 . __. OCR C.BEATTIE. P.E. - _ 11800.00 123346 ROBE AT BE 1R WILLIAM FROST $273.60 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-34 123347 BELL SECURITY 9106.69 SAFETY CONSULTATION SERVICES 123348 J 6 H BERGE INC $82.69 _- _ _ ___LAB SUPPLIES 123349 BCEHRINGEP MARKHEIN $497.64 LAB SUPPLIES _ --- -- 123350 BCISE CAICACE CFC PRCCUCTS $249.33 OFFICE SUPPLI88 123351 BGh-A-RUES $403.88 TRUCK PARTS 123352 BONNEVILLE EQUIP INC $250.00 DOCUMENT RESEARCH 123353 PRENNER-FIEDLER f ASSOC IN $267.70 COMPRESSOR 123354 BRITHINLE ELECTRIC. $3,006.39 ELECTRIC MOTOR_ 193355 BUILCER.S EMPCRIUM $27.66 HARDWARE/LUMBER 123356 GARY G STREED $3.256.29 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT FUND NO 9199 JT GIST WINNING CAPITAL PROCESSING GATE 7/09/92 PAGE 2 REPOAT NUMBER AP43 CCURIY SANIIAIICN DISTRICTS OF CRANGE COUNTY .. . .._ .. ..__ CLAIMS PAID 07/15/92 POSTING DATE 07/15/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ... ... ..._ _. 123357 BUTLER ROPER CCPPAhY 37.694.79 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1233'_8 CEM CCAPCRATION 88.555.71 LAB SUPPLIES 123359 CH2H HILL $5.215.35 ENGINEERING SERVICES 123360 SUMMIT SOLUTIONS. INC $456.44 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 123361 CS COMPANY 259.47 VALVE 123362 CAL-CLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. SN14.59 LAB SUPPLIES 123363 CALTROL INC $3.295.13 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 123364 CAPITAL WESTWARD 5254.08 REGULATOR PARTS _ 123365 CENTURY SAFETY INST A SURF $1.259.13 SAFETY SUPPLIES 123366 CHEVRON lSA INC $5.940.07 OIL 123367._ _ C140-BELL$ 2355.56 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSE 123360 CLEVELAND COTTON PROD $187.83 LAB SUPPLIED 123369 COMPUSA. INC. $2.291.90 COMPUTER HARDWARE/SOFTWARE 123374 COMPUSERVE $12.60 COMPUTER SERVICES _ 123311 CONNELL CM PARTS / DIV 9376.41 TRUCK PARTS 123372 CONSCLICAIEC ELECTRICAL LIST 55.021.62 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES --..123373- _._.._.._. CCRIIREAI$L AIR TOOLS IL0. - _ 53.549.09 .. TOOLS X 123374 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO 52.424.38 CHLORINE = 123375 CONTRACTORS BOON STORE $197.50 PUBLICATION _._123376 CONTROL CAVA CCRP 8/OR 8935.SD INSTRUMENT __..._ OU 123377 CCCPER IRCUSTRIES INC 9975.60 COMPRESSOR PARTS 12337E CCUNIV WHCLESALE ELECTRIC $126.98 ELECTRIC PARTS ---123379 CRISP PUBLICATIONS. INC 5501.58 - PUBLICATION bO 123385 CROWN FENCE CO $3.336.00 FENCING 1 123381 CRYSTAL CLEAR WINDOW PAINT. $2.250.00 WINDOW CLEANING N -- 123382 STATE $CAFE IF EBULIIATICN 1365.27 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK FEES _ 123383 STATE WAIIP RESCLPCEI CCNTRCI $39.09 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK CLEANUP-FEES 123384 DAILY PILCI 995.00 NOTICES 6 ADS .. 123385 .. DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 52.371.55 TIRES 123386 DEZURIK AND/OR CS CO 5144.84 VALVE PARTS 123387 DIALCS INFORMATION SERVICES $84.14 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 123388 DIATEC Eh%IRCRMEKYAL $3.721.14 CHEMICALS 123309 DIETERICF - POST CO $68.57 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123390 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $3.354.27 PRINTING 123391 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP ,828.703.0E OFFICE EQUIPMENT 123392 SYCOh CORK 5146.93 PRINTING SUPPLIES - 123351 DICNEX CORP. 11.036.95 LAB SUPPLIES 123354 . SCARCE ENIERFRISES INC $924.82 PLANT MAINTENANCE A REPAIR$ 123395 ROBERT F DRIVER ASSOC 1114.271.00 INSURANCE POLICIES - - - - -- --�- 123396 - DUNN EDWARDS CORP $5,727.56 PAINT SUPPLIES 123397 O-VALS SALES 1578.85 FITTINGS 123398 DYNALCO CCNTRCLS $3.306.48 INSTRUMENT PARTS - -�- -�---- 123355 EPA SERVICES INC $3.684.76 ENGINEERING SERVICES P2-44, J-23-2 1234UO EASIFAN INC 84.171.15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123401 EBERHARD EQUIPMENT $66.60 TRUCK PARTS - 123402 EXCELLENCE IN TRAINING 3333.U0 TRAINING REGISTRATION FUND AC 9199 . J7 GIST YCPKIKG CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/09/92 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF URANSE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/15/92 POSTING DATE 07/15/92 WARRANT NC. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION .. _... _._ 123403 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $23.178.70 RESIDUALS REMOVAL H.O.10-9-91 123404 JOHN B FALKENSTEIN PE $3.400.00 CONSTRVCTION SERVICES I-9. 1-16_ 12]405 FEDERAL EXPRESS COOP f221.00 AIR FREIGHT 123446 FEPRELLCOE $140.33 PROPANE 223407 _ _ .. _FILTER SLFPLT CC..__ ._ 1264.79 MBCHANICA1 PARTS 123408 FISCHER F PCRTER CO $817.54 CHLORINATION PARTS 123409 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO $2.466.78 LAB SUPPLIES 123610 - FLO-SYSTEMS . f19.369.Ge PUMP PARTS 123411 CLIFFORD A FORKERT $10.036.02 SURVEY SERVICES H.0.6-12-91 123412 FCUN'IAIN VOLLEY CAPENA $39.40 FILM 123413_. .. .. _.__FCX .INOLSIPIIL. SPLES SI.631.45 PAINT SUPPLIES 123414 CITY OF FULLERTCN 981.38 WATER USE 123415 GANAHL LUMBER CO $140.08 BUILDING MATERIALS 123416 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY 31.454.63 CHEMICALS 123417 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO $500.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 123418 GENERAL TELEPHONE CC 9383.30 TELEPHONE SERVICES m .._123AIS—.._._ _ GIERLICPRP17CMELL . INC. _ 35.eB4.85 NECHANICAL PARTS_.__ X 123420 GRAPHIC CCNTRCLS $471.54 OFFICE SUPPLIES = 123421 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS 3201.00 FILM . 123422 RON . GREEN A ASSOCIATES 15.870.00 SURVEYING SERVICES H.0.6-12-91 GO 123423 NB TYPE L CRAPHICS S266.42 PRINTING 4 1234'24 HARBCLR EAGINEERIAG f8.678.00 PUMP PARTS 123125 . _ HARR IN6TCA INOUETR IAL _PLASTI .. f3.201d9 _ VALVES _ Ctl 123426 HATCH I KIRK INC $1.016.18 MECHANICAL PARTS 1 123427 PL HAWN CO INC $47.41 FILTER W 12342E HILTI INC . 1810.01 _. FITTINGS _. „_..........._ 123429 HCERPIGER CVS CALIF INC $270.24 FILTERS 123420 J.T. YORVAlh 3 ASSOC. $2.887.50 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, J-17 _..123431 _ AS HIGHES CC INC . 3570.04 ..._ PAINT SUPPLIES ....... 123432 HUNTER CORPORATION f786.494.00 CONSTRUCTION J-19-1 123433 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER SIN S68.96 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123434 HUNTINGTCA SUPPLY $49.88 HARDWARE ._ _ _. _,_„__ _____ 123435 HLhTING7CN VALLEY ECNWIKN C $2.508.95 BICYCLE PARTS 123436 I.G. INDUSTRIAL CORP. $1,298.16 CHEMICALS 123437 IMPERIAL WEST CHLNICAL $39.236.43 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0_.1.1-_14_-90 123438 INDUSTRIAL FILTER PAGE S583.69 FILTERS 123439 INDUSTRIAL ThREICEO PRCCLCTS $1.278.80 CONNECTORS 123440 INCRAP POFER S1.851.36 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123441 INLAND [PAIRS WHITE♦ INC $45.567.04 TRUCKS H.O.4-8-92 123442 INTERMOUNTAIN SCIENTIFIC CORP $3.720.74 SAFETY SUPPLIES 123443 IRSTPUMENT SPECIALISTS $9,182.50 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 12344E INTERSTATE BATTERY WATER SVS7EIE f2.$64.66 BATTERIES 123445 GREAT ESNCR YSAN1 DISTRICT 098.32 JATERNITORIAL USE RI 12399E GREAT CATERING SPNITPRT SUPP f3.098A2 JANITORIAL SUPPLIEMEETING 123448 JENSS GATES INN f1$718.14 TOOLS MEETING EXPENSE 12114E JCNSEN TOOLS INC SilR.l9 TOOLS FURD NC 1199 JT GIST 6CRKIRG CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/09192 PAGE 9 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/15/92 POSTING DATE 07/15/92 WARRANT MC. YEROCR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ....____. 123449 JOHN STONE SUPPLY 5578.60 ELECTRIC PARTS 123950 ARE PRODUCTS 146.47 FITTING$ ..._ ._ _.._. 123451 THE. MEITP COMPANIES $954.90 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-35 6 5-36 123A52 MIRG BEARING IRC 52.36R.57 MACHINE SUPPLIES 123453 . MRCS INCIBTRIAL SUFFLIES 44.020.73 TOOLS 123454 MANTIR MCNCICM SR S2.941.10 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 123455 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO 2426.66 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 123456 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO $45.53 SAFETY SUPPLIES 1234l7 LAB SUPPORT $4.600.00 TEMPORARY SERVICES 12315E LAY OFFICES OF RCBERT L LAVOIE $528.29 LEGAL SERVICES - FLORES V. VALET 1235l9 .. ...... LEE6ARD SEELVIAG A FILE SYS. $68.33 OFFICE SUPPLIRB 123460 LICBLNT CCRPCRATION 559.88 BATTERIES 123461 MDS AUTOMATION CONTROLS 9296.32 METER 123462 MPS f385.41 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 123463 MACOPCO $572.45 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 123464 MAGNETEM RATIONAL ELECTRIC 32.659.64 PUMP REPAIRS - 123465--_ __._ MAINTENANCE FRCCLCTS .-IAC $8.040.14 MECHANICAL PARTS X 123466 MARVGC ELECTRONICS $35.01 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES = 123461 BON MAURCR $2.125.00 OCEAN MONITORING .+ 123A 68 - -MC FAD DEN DALE HARDWARE CO $61.87 MACHINE SUPPLIES CO 123469 MEASTREMENT CCNTROL SYS INC 3I44.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 123570 MICRCAGE CF CERRITCS 243.13 OFFICE FURNITURE 123411 - RIC6 AY PRE A A/CHIN IL6 - 92:779.95 PUMP PART$_._ W 123472 MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL FATS. 533.55 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 123473 MISCO S19.89 LAB SUPPLIES t 123474 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO 1452.00 _ ELECTRIC PARTS 123415 MONTOOMERV LABORATORIES $1,045.00 LAB SBRVICEB - - - -- - - -- - -- 123476 MCTICN INCUSIRIES INC $567.66 HARDWARE 123477 NA71CKAL ICACEMY TRESS $66.17 PUBLICATION 123478 NATI ORAL ICK SAFETY SC COUNCIL $69.35 SAFETY PILE RENTAL 1234T9 NEW BRUN SLICK ONICNTIFIC $633.10 LAB SUPPLIES 1234PI META Rx ELECTRONICS f695.0A INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 123A82 CITY OF NEYPCRT BEACH f5.9! HATER USE 123AB2 NCYA POY FP IRC 123871.48 CONTRACT FURNITURE 1234E3 TH C FAYIL ICR/IN7E PICR RES 5871.1E OFFICE NT PARTS 123185 THE OHTEMT CORD 21.001.49 INSTRUMENT PARTS 123A85 DY SYSTEMS CO f2I$191.51 CHLORINE M.O.10-9-91 12398E TRANCE CCLN7Y FARCHEMICAL TO ,T91.26 CHEMITOOLS ALB 123487 TRANCE CCLNTY FARM SUPPLY C $1.046.60 TOOLS - - - - 12398E CPANfE YLLYE A SAFE C[. it S60.60 FITTINGS 123489 OXYGEN SERVICKICE L SAFC f60.56 SPY CABINET _- 323A90 OXYGEN SANITAT $6.093.47 SPECIALTY GASES 123A91 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 36.093.64 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP 123493 PSOC CP OCL SUPPLY OF OCT $H.40 BLEAT.V. F 123393 PSSI 98,058.37 T.V. FEWER BERVIC69 - 123494 PACIFIC FAR IS fB.038.31 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WCRMIKG CAPITAL FROCESSING DATE 7/09/92 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 ... CCUKIY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY - - - - CLAIMS PAID 07/15/92 POSTING DATE PT/I5/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION -.. .__.. 123499 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO 12.179.33 SAFETY SUPPLIES 123056 PACIFIC EELL 913.34 TELEPHONE SERVICES 123497 PAGENET $54.00 PAGER RENTAL$ 123490 PALMIERI. TYLER. WIENER. $1.534.23 LEGAL SERVICES - OIL WELLS 1234S9_ .. __._._..PARKSON CCRPCRATION.._ 59.611.19 PLUMBING SUPPLIEQ . ...... -_._._._. 123500 - PERKIK-ELDER CORPORATIOA 1730.42 LAB SUPPLIES 123501 PIMA SRO SYSTEPS INC $112.507.55 RESIDUAL$ REMOVAL M.Q.5-8-91 _ .123502_....' . . _. PLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE $76.26 HARDWARE _ .. I23503 POLYPURE INC $15,535.09 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 123504 POWER TRACK INC $36.64 PUMP PARTS ._ .123501 PRECISICK INDUSTRIES $3.089.79 HARDWARE _... .... _.___.—_ 1235CE HANDED FSIPRCSE ICE S2R7.00 ICE 123507 THE PROJECT SCLU110RS CO. 59.720.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91 .. 123508 AQUA-CHEM. INC 9542.13 INSTRUMENT PARTS 123509 RPR ELECTRIC MOTORS $317.53 ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR 123510. STEVE P. RADOS. INC. $116.588.00 CONSTRUCTION 16-1-1A-2 M ....123511.. ..' RAINECW IISFCSAL CC 11.430.09 TRASH REMOVAL x 123512 RAY SYSTEP TECNNCLOGIES IRC $214.42 PUBLICATION 2 123513 AAININ INSTRUMENT CO.. INC 1199.67 LAB SUPPLIES 123514 RED WING SHOES S245.67 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 123515 AIDE EXPRESS $69.30 COURIER SERVICES —{ 123516 REMECT TIFF $710.40 TEMPORARY SERVICES 193517 REPOIE PETER RESETTING SVS1 15.000.00 POSTAGE METER RENTAL_ Ell 123515 MCJUKNIR-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $7.636.52 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 123519 REMOLD INC. 500.24 MECHANICAL PARTS . . 123520 J R ROBERTS CORP 176.517.00 CONSTRUCTION J-29-1 123521 RYAN-HERCC 51.073.03 FITTINGS 123522 JCSEPN T RYIR3CR A SCR IN $3.349.57 METAL _.123523 SAFT/RIFE INC $619.9s ELECTRIC PARTS ... 123524 SAFETY-KL EEN CORD •161.50 PARTS CLEANER 123525 SAFETY SUPPLY OF AMERICA $209.52 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 123526 SANCCN ERGINEERING INC $600.00 MANHOLE REPAIRS DIST 7 123527 SANTA FE IRDUSTRIAL PLASTICS S514.89 PLUMBING SUPPLIER 123528 SCIENCE AFPLIC47ICKS IRT-L 387-.778.06 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-12-91 123529 SCETT SPECIALTY GASES INC 5300.99 SPECIALTY GASES 123530 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS INC 5382.00 LAB SUPPLIES 123531 SEA COAST DESIGNS 970.94 OFFICE MACHINE 123532 SERPERTIX CCRVEYCR CORP $278.99 MECHANICAL PARTS 123533 SHAMACCX SUFFLY 11.709.69 TOOLS 6 HARDWARE 123534 SHASTA ELECTRIC 52.500.00 ELECTRICAL INSTALLATIONS - LAB 123535 SHIP A SHORE SHEETMETAL 1492.20 ELECTRICAL PARTS - 123536 SHIVA CORP $1,709.00 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 123537 SMUREIUCH SALES 2428.24 HARDWARE 123538 SIGMA CPEPICAL CO $94.16 LAB SUPPLIES 123535 SMITH-EPEFV CC $2.655.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-17-91 323540 SMITH PIFE A SUPPLY INC $12.12 PLUMBING SUPPLIES a NC 9199•- JI GIST WINNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/09/92 PAGE • 4 REPORT &UNDER AP43 .. .. CCU&TY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/15192 POSTING DATE 07/15/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 123541 SCUTPERK CALIF (DI SOU CO 526.851.94 PONBR 123l42 SO CALIF EDISON CO $105.790.83 POWER 123543 SO CAL GAS CO 110.223.26 NATUML GAB - 123544 SO CALIF WATER CO $38.67 WATER USE -123545- SOUTHER& COUNTIES CIL CC 5452.62 DIESEL/UNLBADED FUEL 123546 SP4RNLITTS GRINNING WATER 52.945.39 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTAL 123547 SIANEA 2 SFASSCFF FE $1.400.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES N.O.]-11-92 123548 WESTALLCY INC 9189.03 WELDING SUPPLIES 123549 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS INC 5476.85 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 123550 SUMMIT STEEL $555.99 METAL 123551 -. . .SUPELCO INC E1.366.711 LAB SUPPLIBB 223592 SUPER [HIP CCRP 5379.87 CHEMICALS 1235!3 SLFEN FCIIR FRCCUCTS 51.034.40 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 123554 T 6 K CCKIRACT GLAZIRG 1957.00 GLASS 123555 TAYLOR-DUNN NFG COMPANY $1.321.12 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 123556 TAYLOR INDUSTRIAL SOFTWARE $2.910.01 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 123517 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $215.11 MACHINE SUPPLIED I77 123558 TRAFFIC C[NIRCL SERVICE INC $668.47 SAFETY SUPPLIES x 1235!9 TRAVEL TFAVEL $6.664.00 TRAVEL SERVICES = 123568 TRUCK L AUTC . SUPPLY INC Si12.82 TRUCK PARTS bG 123561 TUSTIN DODGE 968.79 TRUCK PARTS 123562 TWINING LABORATORIES OF 55.455.75 LAB SERVICES 1 123563 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $358.56 PARCEL SERVICES 123564 UNITED STATES ELEVATOR CORP $543.22 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 123515 VLR SCIERIIFIC $2.948.81 LAB SUPPLI89 CT 12356E VALIK CCRPORATION $564.24 REGULATOR PARTS 123567 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO $2.766.46 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 123568 VAN WATER 8 ROGERS $1.286.15 CHEMICALS 123569 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS 92.924.77 PRINTING 123570 VARION AROLVIICAL INSTRUPENTS $2,106.78 LAB SUPPLIES -. _. _......___.. _- 123571 VERTEX SVSIEFS $12.147.25 OFFICE EQUIPMENT/COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 123572 VILLAGE NURSERIES $21.44 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 123573 VOLLER. SAVAGE 6 ASSOC $431.25 INSURANCE 6 RISK MANAGEMENT CONSULTING- 123574 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $33.360.75 CAUSTIC SODA H.0.8-8-90 123575 WESTIN ENCINEERIKG SI0.967.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES 123576 WFSTRUX IRTERKA710NAL $413.53 TRUCK PARTS 123577 VCRTNNEIIN FORD $86.452.17 TRUCKS M.O.4-8-92 123578 XEROX [CRP 59.535.14 COPIER LEASES 323579 2IEBARIN AND ALPER 566.807.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-34-i ----------------- IOIAL [LAWS PAID 07/15/92 33r914 J61.37 FUND NO 9199 -- JT DIET WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 07/09/92 PAGE-7 - - -------- REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY -- - CLAIMS PAID 07/15/92 POSTING DATE 07/15/92 - - --- -- SUMMARY AMOUNT - A1 OPEN FUND __.._.. . . . _ 5142.2E ..... . _ . . _...__.. 41 CAP FAC FUND $117,14D.50 N2 OPER FUND $IS,166.60 N2 CAP FAC FUND $573.37 - -- - -- ----- N3 OPER FOND $17,123.89 45 OPER FORD $14,897.79 NS CAP PAC FUND _.._.. _. _. .. . . _ $2,724.38 46 OPER FUND $99.65 N7 OPER FUND $3,059.83 N7 CAP FAC FOND $503,98 - .._... . ......._._.-...-.-.. NI1 OPBR FUND $8,159.00 013 OPER FUND $24.19 m N14 OPER FUND _ _. $58.19 .._.._---_. ._ ... . ..._...- _ X 424 CAP FAC FWD $9,911.26 = 45&6 OPEN FUND $1,917.20 •--' N7&14 OPEN FUND - - .. $12.08 .. .. .. ... ..._. .. ._ .... FJJ JT OPER FOND $754,027.41 CORF $2,737 571.94 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS -$37:420.76 _.---.-__.- CO JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $172,757.07 I -------------- $3 V ,914,161.37 . - .. .............. FURS NC 9191 JT DIST LCPNIRG CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/23/92 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 _..__..._ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNT? CLAIMS PAID 07/29/92 POS7INO DATE 07/29/92 YARRANT. NC. VEKDOR AMOUNT - DESCRIP71ON 123601 AS TECH COMPANY f66.588.85 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 123602 ASK ANALYSIS f8B0.00 - ENGINS OIL ANALYSIS - - -- 123603 A T S T 93,246.20 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 12360E APFRICAK IELEPHOKE 0 TELEGRAPH $1.504.01 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 123615 A T f 1 1513.69 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES- - - 123666 ACCU•LASS RESEARCH INC f50.60 LAB SERVICES 123607 ACTION RENTALS f1.785.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 12360E ADVANCED CCOLING TECHNOLOGIES $451.41 ELECTRIC PARTS . . ._. 123609 AIR PHCTC SERVICES $280.16 AERIAL PHOTOS 123610 AIR FRCCLCIS S CHEPICAL IR $16.815.00 06M AGREEMENT ORY. GEM SYST M.0.8-9-89 123611 ALPNAGAZ 9082.56 SPECIALTY GASES 123612 AMERICAN DISTRICT TELEGRAPH $75.00 SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS 123613 AMERICAN MEDIA INC - S98.95 VHS TAPE PREVIEWS 123614 ROBCO IAC EZCR APERICAN SEALS $727.31 PUMP PARTS _- .- 123E15 APFRICAR TYPE CULTURE COLLECIK $508.25 LAB SUPPLIES 123616 CHARLES E. ANDERSON $275.00 MACHINE REPAIRS m 123617 - ANGEL SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $1.036.59 LAB SUPPLIES >< 123618 ANIR7ER . OISTRIBU71[h $502.04 COMPUTER PARTS 2 123619 A•PLUS SKSTEPS $3.312.66 NOTICES h ADS '-' 123620 ABC LABCRAICRIES f2.165.00 LAB SERVICES _ .. .. . . . .. _ _ CCI 123621 AQUATIC TESTING LABORATORY 9500.00 LAB SERVICES 123622 ARATEA SERVICES INC $4.268.57 UNIFORM RENTALS 123623 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT S482.99 INSTRUMENT PARTS O'1 125624 ART IORNS $106.03 AWARDS FRAMING 123625 ASSC CIATE[ DIESEL 3672.60 BNGINE PARTS h-� 123621 ASSOC. AOP IN IS. 6 CORSULTAKIS f270.00 MEDICAL INSURANCE ADMIHIBTRATION__..._...__ 123627 BRM LANDFILL $20.524.13 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 123628 BAN SAFETY 6 SUPPLY $58.19 SAFETY SUPPLIES 123629 B BATEMAK S600.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION_._-._..._ 123630 BATTERY SPECIALTIES f260.47 BATTERIES 123631 BARTER CIFENOSTICS IKC $7,707.92 LAB SUPPLIES 123632. BAVLESS STATIONERS $94.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123633 J S N BERGE INC $218.87 LAB SUPPLIES 123634 BOYLE EKEINEERIKG CORP $33.260.69 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-30 _.123635 _ DRENKER•FIEDLER A ASSOC IS $1.836.59 . .. _ COMPRESSOR, 12363E OLCGET JAAITCPIAL $137.50 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 123637 BUILDERS EMPORIUM $66.42 HARDWARE/LUMBER 123638 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES INC $1,772.00 SURVEY SERVICES M.O.6-12-91- 123639 GARY G STREED $4.646.84 PEYTY CASH RRINBURBEMENT - � - 123640 BUTLER PAPER COPPAhY $208.33 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123E91 SLPPI7 SCILTIEKS. INC $4.180.37 SERVICR AGREEMENT 123643 IS ETON AY lq$187.50 VALVES 123693 JOHN ET ON LNOIIiEKGI f187.06 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-20, 9-90 123645 JCHN CARCLLO ENGINEERS i129.556.06 ENGINEERING PARTS e6RVICe9 J-20� P2-d3,. PI-39 _ 12369E CHARLES L CARTER CO $166.10 TRUCK PARTS 123E Of DICK CFP EM IKC f166.10 TRUCE PARTS FUND NO 9199 - Jl DIST WORKINF CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7123192 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 . . - CCURTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID D7/29/92 POSTING DATE 07/29/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 123647 ChEVRCN LSA INC $3.303.90 OIL 6 GREASE 123648 CCASTAL CFLCRINATION - f3.020.00 WATER SYST. CHLORINATION 123649 CCLICP AKC SONS 12.275.075.0C CONSTRUCTION I-9 123650 COMPUSA. INC. $5.685.70 COMPUTER HARDWARE/SOFTWARE 123651 , COMPUSERVE f26.27 COMPUTER SERVICES 1236EE-2 CONNELL GM PARTS / DIV 943.TN TRUCK PARTS 123653 CONSCLICATEC ELECTRICAL LIST $0.200.22 ELECTRIC PARTS 123651 CCNTAINER12E0 CPEMICAL DISPO f6.294.75 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL 123655 CONTINENTAL AIR 700LS INC $331.82 TOOLS 123656 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO 51.616.25 CHLORINE M.O.9-9-91 123657 CCh71hEN7AL GRAPHICS 3590.13 PRINTING _ . _. . 123658 CCCPER IRCUSTRIES INC f1.049.71 COMPRESSOR PARTS 1236E.9 CCCRCIKA71E EGLIF CC INC f375.00 MACHINE PARTS 123660 COSTA FESA AUTO SUPPLY SI.U20.38 TRUCK PARTS 123661 R E COULTER CRANE RENTAL f666.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 123662 COUNCIL OF BIOLOGY EDITORS 569.90 - PUBLICATIONS 123693 STATE CF CALIFORNIA 3876.55 PROCUREMENT FEED m 123664 STATE OF CALIFCRNIA $157.50 HAZARDOUS MASTS TAX X 123GE5 STATE CF CAIIFCAKIA $321.24 DIESEL USE FEES 2 123666 DARES 6 PECRE 524.175.92 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-39-3 , 123667 PETER C DAVID CO SIDT.383.50 CONSTRUCTION 3-24-2 193668 DE ANZA CORPORATION $150.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL —1 123669 - MSK/DECKER $319.97 INSTRUMENT PARTS__-_ 123670 DEZURIN ONO/CR IS CO $2,721.51 PLUMBING SUPPLIES f") 123611 DIGITAL ECL'IPOERT CCRP f9.588.68 OFFICE EQUIPMENT N 123672 DORADO ENIERFPISES INC _ . . flog.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS 223673 ROBERT F DRIVER ASSOC 5645.169.00 PROPERTY INSURANCE 9.O.7-8-92 323674 DUNN EOURDS COOP 579322.99 PAINT SUPPLIES .123675. ._ _.. EASTPAN IRC _ _.. $5.113.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES_ _ 123616 ECOAKALVSIS INC $4.090.34 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.7-17-91 123677 ELECTRO-IL'ST INC 93,256.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS .. 123678 _. ELECTRO NUMERICS INC $164.09 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 123679 ENCHANTER INC 57.260.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.7-1T--91 123680 EIT $260.92 INSTRUMENT PARTS ._123681._ __ ERVIRCNEERIAL PRCC. USA 99.686.73 TRUCK PARTS 123662 ENYIPCNFENIAL RESOURCE ASSCC f646.50 LAB SERVICES 123683 MARSHALL FAIRRES $178.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 123684 _ _ ... FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $17.041.22 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 123685 JOHN B FALKENSTEIN FE $3,400.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 1-9, 1-16 123686 FAX PRESS 954.51 OFFICES SUPPLIES 123607_ FEDERAL EAPRESS CCRF $336.75 AIR FREIGHT „ _ __ . _ ___ 223608 CNEMNEST INC $749.94 SCRUBBER PARTS - 123689 FISCHER f PORTER CO $3.233.10 CHLORINATION PARTS _. 123690 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO $310.41 LAB SUPPLIES 123691 FLO•SYSTEPS $4,818.73 PUMP PARTS 123692 FCRBES CCPPUTER GROUP INC SRO.00 FREIGHT f UND NO 9199 - JT OAST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/23/92 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNT? .. -. .. _ . ___ --....-. CLAIMS PAID 07/29/92 POSTING DATE 07/29/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 123693 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $50.09 FILM 123694 FCUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $851.55 PAINT SUPPLIES 123695 FCA ENTERPRISES $1.625.00 SAFETY CONSULTANT 123696 FOR INDUSTRIAL SALES $36.85 ELECTRIC PARTS 123697 FRANCE COMPRESSOR PRODUCT 113.716.57 COMPRESSOR PARTS 12369E BUD FREY $71.16 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 123699 OANAPL LLPBER CO $1,634.59 HAROWARE 123700 SATES FIEERGLASS INSTALLERS 97.500.00 FIBERGLASS REPAIRS _ 1237L1 GENERAL CIEAhICS, INC. 3283.37 LAB SUPPLIES 123702 GENERAL 1ELEPMORE CO $4.233.98 TELEPHONE SERVICES 123703 VITALY GOROOETSKY $131.72 DEFERRED COMP PAY/OFF, . 123704 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES INC $69.00 PUBLICATIONS 123705 GRAHAM L .APES $1.767.42 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.8-14-91' 123716 CRAPHIC CT3TRIBUICRI $1.146.46 FILM 123707 OCR GREEK A ASSOCIATES 119.635.00 SURVEY SERVICES M.0.6-12-91 I23708 "SO TECHNOLOGY 9516,400.00 CONSTRUCTION J-23-2 6 P2-44 123709 . . NB .TYPE A GRAPHICS . _.. $71.12 .--... PRINTING fll 123710 HACH CCMFANY $2.767.26 SAFETY SUPPLIES X 123711 FRED A PAMPER $1.504.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION = 123732 MARRIAGiCR IhOUS1RIAL PLAS11 - 7 PLUMBING SUPPLIES r . 349 .38 .--. _ ._ __.. _.... I93714 NATCP A CKIRKONTAINERS INC f15.860.69 TRASH PARTS 123715 HAUL HANY CONY INCCRS 34.860.00 TRASH REMOVAL I23715 - PL HAYN CO .INC . $201.09 _ . _ FILTERS .,_ f7 12ST16 HELLO 1207.09 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 1 123717 MILL[IT FI[K/RO CO $3J.673.99 LAB EQUIELECTRIC PART W _123719 MIL11 ACC _ . . .081.95 . . _ LABCTNIC PARTS 123719 MCEFER SCIENTIFIC INS1R. f2.081.95 LAB 9UPPLI88 ------- ------ ------- 123720 HGERSIGER CYS CALIF INC $1.674.69 COMPRESSOR PARTS - 123721---- - - ._.RC_-HOFFMAN --AND/OR .. ISCO ----. f23.277.23. __.- -. -. . ... SAMPLER _ _ 123722 J.l. hORVAIM E ASSOC. $3.000.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23J-23 123723 RE HLGhE1 CC IRC $655.96 PAINT SUPPLIES .12372A_ HURTER CCRPORATION 3309.337.00 _ -- CONSTRUCTION 123725 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER SIR 1232.20 OFFICE SUPPLIES - 123726 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHYINN C i387.83 BICYCLE PARTS -.123727-. - _- -.. HURLEY-_ ELECTRONICS - INC _. _ $23.55_. .. _- _. .. _._...ELECTRONICS .9UPPLI88 123720 1 C F INC $50.00 PUBLICATIDN 123729 I.G. INCLEIRIAL CCPP. $2.714.47 FERROUS CHLORIDE M.0.4-8-92 - 123730_-__. .. INC INDUSTRIES _. -. $961.80 _ INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES._,_ 123731 ISCO INC $169.03 INSTRUMENT PARTS - 123712 IMPERIAL 6EST CHEMICAL $41.459.72 FERRIC CHLORIDE H.0.11-14-90 _.123733-__ _ . LIBRAS F/PER _ 3813.9E - _. . OFFICE SUPPLIES 123735 IKLARE EIAINE SCIENTIFIC CC. f95.281.91 TRUCK M.0.5-14-92 123735 IhSTRUMENTA1N SCIENTIFIC CCRp $3.032.50 LAB BQUIPMBNT SE __.123737.. _. _ INSTRUMENT SPECIALISTS $2.064.00 INSTRUMENT SERVICES 193738 INTERCONNECTIONS S2.160.00 COMPUTER AGREEMENT 12l7]B ION CO RP[RATION f348.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST KINKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/23/92 FACE R REPORT NUMBER AP43 ... COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY -- CLAIMS PAID 07/29/92 POSTING DATE 07/29/92 WARRANT NO. .VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ___...._._._ 123739 PACTEL TELETRAC $35.00 TELEPHONE SERVICES 123740 JLA CREDIT CORP i145.32 MICROFICHE READER LEASE 123741 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP $783.01 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES I23742 JIM.f SLM-FEh£ICK SERVICE S50.00 TRUCE PARTS 123743, JCNNSCN PCVER OF NO.AMERICA _. 53811.85 MECHANICAL PARTS 123744 JORDAN CONTROLS INC $247.13 INSTRUMENT PARTS 123745 KING REAPING INC $262.78 MACHINE SUPPLIES 123746 KNU MISTRIAL SUPPLIES $1.625.71 TOOLS . .._ _._..._..... 123741 PARTIN RIRDIC6 IN S2.999.20 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 123746 LAB SUPPORT 53.149.25 LAB SERVICES 123749 .LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT.L LAVOIE i50.00 LEGAL SBRVIC68.- PLGR68 123750 LEGI•TECH 6275.00 COURIER SERVICES 1237E1 NP LINDSTROM INC $6.510.80 CONSULTING SERVICE - HPDBS 123752 LCRAIN POCOUCTS $1.251.30 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT - RELIANCE._PONER 123753 MPS $8.62 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 12375E MAINFRAPE SERVICE INC i3.622.00 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 123755 MANLEY-S BOILER REPAIR CO. INC ._ $1.616.35 VALVE._ _ .._ , _. ....... X123756 NARITA $1,549.99 GROUNDBRBEPING SUPPLIES = 1237'_7 MATT • CHLOR INC $1.016.00 CHLORINATION PARTS .r 123758. . MCOAIR IASTRUPERTS 33.233.87 INSTRUMENT ._— CO 123759 PCGARPY CENTRAL TYPEWRITER 1 $1.564.00 SERVICE AGREEMENTS 123760 PEASUREGUIPMERT INC 95.257.06 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 123T61 MERRILL LYNCH CAPITAL MARKETS .. _ 530.799.52 _ _ ... REMARKETING AGREEMENT,____ n 123762 MICROAGE COMPUTER S1.20.93 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 1 123763 MIDWAY MFG A PACMINING S3.3VI.11 MACHINE REPAIRS 1231E6 . MILLIPORE ANC/OR WATERS _ $937.15 .. .LAB. SUPPLIES 1237E5 MILLIKORICS $240.71 INSTRUMENT PARTS --- 123766. MINNESOTA NE37ERN VISUAL PRES. $617.05 OFFICE MACHINE 12316L.. L_ .._. .MITCHELL PACIFIC CONSTRUCTORS $65,610.00 _ .. _ _ CONSTRUCTION 7-11-2 1237ES MOTICN INDUSTRIES INC $23.21 HARDWARE 123769 MCTORCLA INC $132.50 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 123730 .. NATICNAL LATER RESEARCH 850.009.00. ANNUAL CONTRIBUTION M.0.7_17-91 123772 NEW RKDRELICK SCIENTIFIC i123.95 LAB RUMEN IEe 1237T2 NENARK ELECTRONICS .170.17 INSTRUMENT PUPPLI68 __123174.. . _..OfRC AL .CONTROLS .INC .. i1 d95.25 .. ._.._ .. MECHANICAL PARTS ,_ 123775 Of FORPOPATIDR 925.25 - LAB RUPPGIES 12371L OCCUFETI CNAL VISION SERVICES $193.81 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY GW99E8 ._ 123717 _. CF FI CE EPVIL IChf IATCPILP flF£ .573.17 _ CHLORIOFFICENE FURNITURE 123778 UK BYEIE ES TR $19.573.17 ELECTRIC N.O.10-9-9i - 123778 ON-LINE ELECTRONICS 5105.0E FITTINGS SUPPLIES 323700 ...., __ ORANGE VALVE E FITTING CO. 31.022.40 _ SPECIALTY 123700 CMYGIR SERVICE .969.5E DEFERRED OASES 12.3702 CCLN'TY EANITAT/EN CI3TRII1 .650.1E PREMIUM COMP DIBTRIBUTIDN ISM . CSOCC SELF-FUNDED MEDICAL 1 $100.000.00 PREMIUM ADVANCE 123783 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT s1R3212.61 INSTRUMENT WORKERS COMP INSURANCE- - 123784 PACIFIC PARTS i212.61 INSTRUMENT PARTS FUND NC 9199 - JT DIST WCPKIK6 CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/23/92 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 ._ _ . ... . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY . .. CLAIMS PAID 07/29/92 POSTING DATE O7/29/92 WARRANT NO. VEKDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 123185 PACO PUMPS S664.93 PUN? PARTS 123786 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO $29.072.22 SAFETY SUPPLIES 123787 PACIFIC FELL $614.16 TELEPHONE SERVICES 12378E PACIFIC IAIER CCNOTITCRING C $68.40 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 123789 PACTEL YEFIDIAN SYSTEMS $55.97 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 123790 PAX WEST 391.57 JANITORIAL SERVICES I23791 PARTS UNLIMITED 91.933.99 TRUCK PARTS 123752 ROY PENOEPGRAFT $960.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 123793 PEPMIK•ELYER CORPORATIOR $684.75 LAB SUPPLIES 123754 PHCTC E SOL" CO f98.42 OFFICE FURNITURE 123795 F10NEER BAKN 372.779.10 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 5-33-3 123796 PITNEY BONES $452.02 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 123797 POLYFURE INC $13.500.26 CATIONIC POLYMER H.O.7-17-91 123798 PORTER BCILER SERVICE IKC $269.51 PACKING MATERIALS 123799 PCST tONSIYYP PR CLUCIS f81901.39 PRINTING 123801 PCLER ELICYPC SLPPLA CC $914.56 ELECTRIC BUPPLI68 123802 POECI SYSTEMS ,163.46 FITTINGS TTT 123003 PREMIER UN INDUSTRIES $1.163.9E FITTINGS = 323803 PREMIER PRINTING CORP. $5.471.55 PRINTING 123805 - HRROLC PRIMROSE SERVICE ICE f259.00 ICI .. . b~U 123866 PROFPROJECT SERVICE ENO. $4.720.00 SOILS NSTR TENTING 123807 TUC PROJECT SCLUiIONS CO. f99720.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91 � 123808 PULSAFEEOEF SSOO.90 PUMP PARTS � 123P08 AQUA-CHEM. INC f2.S01.90 INBTRVMENT PARTS 123819 QUALITY DLIL DING SLPFLY S83.72 BUILDING MATERIALS 1J1 123E 10 APY ELECTRIC MCI ORS 21.666.48 ELECTRIC PUMP REPAIR 123811 SIEVE P. RADOS. INC. 6588.268.91 CONSTRUCTION 19-1-IA-2 123812 RECYC INC 352,032.76 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.3-13-91 . 123813 RED .WING SHOES $227.57 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES. _,_ 12381E REST $713.31 MAP INDEXES 123815 REDI EAPPE53 $56.70 COURIER SERVICES /2381t REISP MARINE SILC1ES. IKC $1.060.00 OCEAN MONITORING 123017 NCJUKKIK-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $5,009.32 PLUMBING SUPPLIES - - 123818 PEGGY RUPP $540.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION _.123819 . . JCSEPH I RYERSON 6 SON 1N $349.68 METAL 123820 SAFT/KIFE IKC $282.83 ELECTRIC PARTS 123821 SAFE71•'MLEEN CCPF $86.70 PARTS CLEANER ..123822- . SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 32.096.IL PLUMBING SUPPLIES 123623 RICHARD E. SCNLEGEL S3.000.00 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 123820 SEA COAST DESI6KS $109.90 OFFICE EQUIPMENT _123625_. SERPEKIIM CCKVETCR CORP f2.066.09 MECHANICAL PARTS _ 123E2E SPAMPCCV ICIEKTIFIC SPEC SYS $419.32 LAB SUPPLIES 123027 SKAMRCCK SUPPLY f1.J57.29 TOOLS 123828 SHASTA CLECTRIC $9.300.00 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 123829 SHURELUCK SALES f7.966.21 PAINT SUPPLIES 123630 SIGMA CHIPICAL CO $361.41 PUBLICATIONS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST YCHKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/23/92 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP 13 _ . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY - - -- -- - CLAIMS PAID 07/29/92 POSTING DATE 87/29/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 123831 SILVERI S LE BOUEF $655.011.90 CONSTRUCTION 5-34-3 123832 SMITH-EMEPY CO $1.610.00 SOIL TESTING M.C.7-17-91 123833 SC COAST AIR QUALITY $2.375.00 PERMIT FEES 12383/ SCLIP CCAST WATER $67.50 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 123835 SCUTLERR CALIF EDISON CO S202.331.03 POWER _ 123836 SUU7HERN COUNTIES OIL CO S10.579.33 DIESEL/UNLEADED FUEL 123837 SOUVENIR PHOTO $113.26 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 123838 WESTALLCY, INC $338.13 WELDING SUPPLIES 123839 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS INC $64.65 PLUMBING SUPPLIES - 123810 SPEW IACIS7RIES INC $527.35 CAR SUPPLIES 1238/1 SRECC FLERIBLE S2.662.61 TRUCK PARTS 123812 STATE STREET BANK $5.325.00 C.O.P. ACHIM FEES 123643 STERLING ART $47.76 OFFICE SUPPLIES 12381/ SUBURBAN FCRD $10.891.65 TRUCKS (3( M.0.4-8-92 123845 - SUPM17 STEEL $276.50 METAL 123646 SLNSET FCPU $310.00 TRUCE PARTS 123E47 SUPER CHIP CORP $2.885.17 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES T 123818 SUN-LITE CORPORATION $21.017.66 WASTE DIGESTER FLARES X 123849 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG COMPANY S1.212.51 ELECTRIC CART PARTS _ .. 1228!C TIMMAR CCVPAKY .. 3830.36 CAB.SUPPLIES .. CG 123051 THE TEKWIPE COMPANY 195.12 VALVE 1238!2 CMARLES E IPCNAS $1.373.80 BUILDING RSPAIRS _123853 ___ THCKPSON 16OUSTRIAL SUPRLV_ . : . S857.2G _. ._ _.. _. MARDWARS __..__....._._ . I2385/ TILE MATTERS S119.72 BUILDING MATERIALS CI 123855 TOYO LANDSCAPING CO 57.986.7/ CONTRACT GROUNDSKESPING M.O.11-13-91 C7T _123856 . TRAVEL TRAVEL __ .. $2.320.00 TRAVEL SERVICES 123857 - TRUCK A AUTC SUPPLY INC 516/.79 TRUCK PARTS 1238•.8 JG TUCKER C SCA INC S925.1/ INSTRUMENT PARTS __123859 .... __ .. DANIEL TURRICLIFE .._ . . _ 587.87 _ _DEFERRED COMP_PAY[OFF__ .__ 123860 TUSTIN OOD6E 1226.61 TRUCK PARTS 323861 US RENTALS $2.020.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT . .1238E2___ . .ULTRA SYSTEMS $1.211./0 ENGINEERING SERVICES 123863 URION BANK 57.290.00 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 7-11=2--'- 12386/ UNOCAL $67.23 UNLEADID GASOLINE _123E65_. .. -_.. UNITED. CONCRETE COPPANIES. . .$376.91 _ _ __ __ CONCRETE 123866 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE S16/.2U PARCEL SERVICES 123867 UNITED TAPE CORPORATION $63.19 PUBLICATION .__623BEE._ ._YG/FISIGNS INSTRUPENTS. $12.000.02 CAN EQUIPMENT 123869 VWR SCIER71FIC $3.147.40 LAB SUPPLIES - - - I23970 VALLEY CITIES SLPPLV CC $7.322.32 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 123671_ _ .. _ . VAAIEA BUSINESS FORMS _ $2.290.62 _ .. PRINTING 123672 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS 51.608.9E LAB SUPPLIES 123673 VERNE•S PLUMBING 335.00 PLUMBING SERVICES _1230711 VERTEM SYSTEPS $1,397.50 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 123875 VILLAGE RCRSERIES $91.36 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 223276 VCRTEK IRCUSIRIES $270.00 DOOR REPAIRS FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WEANING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/23/92 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 _.- ._._ CCUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/29/92 POSTING DATE 07/29/92 .WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 123877 BCD 6ARE PHOTOGRAPHY $175.09 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES 12381E CARL WARREN A CO 9300.00 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR- -.._-._._.. 123879 WATER EAVIRONPENT FED. S1.225.06 TRAINING REGISTRATION 123880 WESTERN. HIGHWAY PRODUCTS IN $255.19 SAFETY SUPPLIES 123981 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY S1T.526.69 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.6-0-94 . - 123882 WHATPAN LAB SALES INC $769.50 LAB SUPPLIES 123883 WILLIAMS E WILKINS 136.27 LAB SUPPLIES 123G84 RCURME A .I000PLFF 1 CA S79.102.90 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.I-19-92 - 123885 GECAGE YARDLEY CC 159.69 VALVE 123886 YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEMS $232.56 FREIGHT 12388? RICHARD YOUNG PROD S2.422.63 PRINTING SUPPLIBS_ . _.._—___ 123888 CARL ZEISS INC $15.314.65 LAB EQUIPMENT 123SP9 21EBARTP A ALPER/C.S. ALPER $32.154.00 CONSTRUCTION P2-02-1 1248SO RICHARD E ECGAR 4200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION ----------------- m TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 07/29/92 $6.943,837.49 X e_easeeec__ae_cR 2 -'I BUMMARY AMOUNT Ej M1 OPER FUND j0,131.70 V 01 CAP FAC FUND $89,493.13 02 OPER FUND ___ _ ._ 112,720,21 R2 CAP FAC FUND $33,283.62 B3 OPER FUND $42,076.74 —Ki .CAP:FAC. FUND___ - _. _ ___--. ...-_. .__ i1101405.50_ R5 OPER POND 7,643.23 31 - RS CAP FAC FUND i72$2$5,160.85 - -Re OPER.FUND._ .. . .. ,5 . _ 97 OPER FUND ,5535.57 07 CAP FAC FUND j7$4,6527.62 0 —#LI-OPBR FUND,014 OPER FUND $104$615.72 99 010 OPER FUND ,554.07 . 0l8 -0AP PAC FUND j5$3,505.22 05E6 OPEN FUND j3,$32.49 0667 OPER FUND 578.48 07b10 OPER FUND 48,629.71 3T OPER FUND p,308,618.71 CORF $3,566,669.69 .. ..SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $262,216.51 3T WORKING CAPITAL $135,371.08 ------------------- -. _._ _ $6,043,037.40 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS BI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA August 16, 1992 IOBM ELLI9 AVENUE PO BOX 8127 , FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 82728.8127 171419822411 M E M O R A N D U M TO: All Board Members RE: (1) Adjourned Meeting(s) to Consider and Act on State Budget Impact on Districts' Property Tax Revenues (2) Staff Reports Re: State's Proposed Shift of Districts' Property Taxes and Options to Make Up Lost Property Taxes; and 1992-93 Sewer Use Fees (1) As of this writing (4:00 p.m. , Tuesday, August 18th) the State has yet to adopt a budget. Therefore, the adjourned meeting of the Boards scheduled for August 19th has been cancelled and (tentatively) rescheduled to August 26th at 7:30 p.m. If the Governor and Legislature do not agree on a budget in the interim, we will advise you prior to the scheduled meeting time to let you know whether or not the meeting on the 26th will be conducted. Again, if you will be difficult to reach by telephone, we would appreciate it if you would call late Tuesday, August 25th or early Wednesday, August 26th, for confirmation. Please ask for Penny Kyle or Mary Simpson at (714) 962-2411, Extension 2026 or 2029, respectively. (2) Enclosed are two separate staff reports which discuss the proposals to take enterprise special district property taxes and shift them to help fund schools, currently under consideration by the Governor and the State Legislature, the potential impact on the Districts, and options that the Directors could consider to make up for the lost property taxes. This will provide Board Members with background information necessary to address this important issue. If you have any questions, please do It hesitate to call me. J. ralManager lvester Gen JWS:sc Enclosures `✓ cc: Board Secretary General Counsel i I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS '4 M ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA August 18, 1992 10944 ELUS AVENUE Ro.BOX 8127 F WAIN VALLEY.CAUFORNIA 9272E-8121 a14)962-0411 STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: State' Proposed Shift of Districts' Property Taxes and Options to Make Up Lost Property Taxes As reported to the Directors at the August 12th Board Meeting, the "Budget Olympics" are continuing in Sacramento as the Governor and Legislature attempt to resolve the State's budget crisis. As you know, they have proposed to shift all or a portion of enterprise special districts' property tax revenue to the State to satisfy the State's obligations to fund schools under Proposition 98. There are currently two alternative proposals that would affect the Sanitation Districts. One is the so-called "Super Pot". Under this alternative all special districts' tax monies would be put into a single pat. In our case, our total $34.2 million in property taxes would be transferred. This would total just under $1.7 billion statewide. Twenty-five percent of that would then be appropriated for the schools and the balance distributed to special districts in a manner similar to the current Special District Augmentation Fund (SDAF) monies by County Supervisors. The second alternative that is being discussed is a proposal that would take between 25% and 30% of enterprise special districts' tax revenues and give that to the schools. In our case, 25% of our total property tax of $34.2 million would be $8.5 million. We would keep the rest. Obviously, the Sanitation Districts would prefer the second alternative. But under any proposal the Boards will be faced with a decision on how to make up for whatever property taxes are shifted in order to maintain the Districts' long-term financial integrity. An important point to remember is that the State will apparently continue to experience budgetary problems for the foreseeable future. To a large extent, their approach to solving their budgetary shortfalls has been to raid the treasuries of local government. Thus, it is clear that if they only succeed in grabbing a portion of enterprise special districts' property taxes this year, in all likelihood they will keep coming back for more next year and, ultimately, all of it in future years. Therefore, sooner or later the Districts will have to significantly increase user fees, over and above what will be necessary increases to finance rising costs of providing sewerage services to the communities we serve, to adequately fund the Districts requirements. (1 of 6) Staff Report re State's Proposed Shift of Districts' Property Taxes/Options August 18, 1992 There are basically three options for making up lost property taxes: 1. Further budgetary cuts. 2. Use of reserves 3. Increase user fees These options are discussed in some detail below. Although there are numerous variations, we have limited our discussion to the three fundamental options to help focus on the impacts of the loss of the Districts historical share of the property tax. 1. Further Budgetary Cuts Recognizing the current economic situation, in developing the 1992-93 budgets the Fiscal Policy Committee worked with staff to take a hard look at budgeted expenditures and determine where cuts could be made. After considerable deliberation the Committee recommended and the Boards approved a 1992-93 budget that is $54.2 million less than the 1991-92 budget, summarized as follows: Com arative Bud et Sumner V Millions of Dollars Increase 1991-92 1992-93 <Decrease> Operations 8 Maintenance $ 61.4 $ 59.9 $< 1.5> Sewerage Facilities Construction 144.2 110.0 <34.2> Debt Service 35.5 39.0 3.5 Reserves 351.3 329.3 <22.0 $592.4 $538.2 $<54.2> V (2 of 6) Staff Report re State's Proposed Shift of Districts' Property Taxes/Options August 18, 1992 All property taxes are allocated to the Operating Funds of the individual Districts, primarily to pay for debt service. Other operating maintenance and repair costs are essentially paid by user fees. The budgeted Operating Fund tax revenue and user fees of the respective Districts for 1992-93 are as follows: 1992-93 Budgeted Property Tax/User Fees Current Current Current User Fee District Tax Revenue User Fees Rate 1 $ 2,060,000 $ 5,941,000 $ 75.00 2 9,105,000 18,077,000 60.00 3 11,665,000 18,748,000 60.00 5 2,816,000 2,040,000 75.00 6 1,467,000 2,959,000 65.00 7 4,430,000 4,809,000 40.00 11 2,652,000 3,335,000 60.00 13* -0- 674,000 100.00 14* -0- -0- -0- Total/Avg. $34,195,000 $56,583,000 $ 60.01 *District 13 receives no property taxes. District 14 is financed by the Irvine Ranch Water District. Therefore, because they are not affected by the property tax shift they will not be discussed in this report. Most other costs of operations continue to rise for several reasons beyond our control. First are the added costs of complying with regulatory requirements - both air quality and water quality. Second are the costs associated with increasing sewerage flows resulting from ongoing development and population increases. Part of the costs associated with these two are, of course, the expenses necessary for operating and maintaining the approximately $100 million in new facilities that are placed into service each year. Finally, the impacts of inflation affect our costs. (3 of 6) Staff Report re State's Proposed Shift of Districts' Property Taxes/Options August 18, 1992 Notwithstanding these increasing costs, $1.5 million in operating budget cuts were made in 1992-93 and, as a result the operating budgets are very tight. In fact, due to the probable delay in starting up central generation we anticipate running over the budget because we will not realize the full electrical cost savings anticipated with an earlier start-up. There are few discretionary expenditures in operating wastewater treatment facilities. Although some further operating budget cuts might be made, any significant reductions would Impair our operating and maintenance capabilities and jeopardize our ability to keep the collection, treatment and disposal facilities in a state of repair that enables us to continuously comply with regulatory requirements and protect public health, the marine environment and the beaches. The experience of our sister agencies (for example, the City of Los Angeles and the City of San Diego) has shown that when operating and maintenance budgets are inadequately financed it causes facilities breakdowns, which in the case of these two cities have resulted in repeated beach closures and attendant fines by regulatory authorities, as well as enforcement actions. With regard to the capital budgets, $34.2 million has already been cut from the 1992-93 budget. Additional cuts could be made in the capital budgets, however, the Directors discussed this at considerable length and concluded that it would be counterproductive in that it would further exacerbate the Orange County economic situation and, further, that it is advantageous to continue with the construction program because of the excellent bids that we are receiving. Moreover, most of the capital expenditures this year are for projects already underway. There is very little new work. Further, property taxes are not used to finance capital projects, except to the extent that they retire the securities issued by the Districts to finance the work. The Districts current capital program is being funded by issuance of debt in accordance with the Districts' long range financial plan. These funds are committed and must be spent within the specified time frame to avoid illegal arbitrage. Thus, there would be little advantage to further cutting the capital budget. 2. Use of Reserves Another option is to use existing reserves to offset the loss of property taxes. Enclosed is a separate staff report (gray) on user fees. Attached to the report are revised cash flow estimates for 1992-93 (tan and green) that reflect the Impact on reserves for both the 100% tax loss scenario and the 25% tax loss scenario. The cash flows assume that the 1992-93 tax loss would not be recovered but that user fees would be raised in subsequent years to make up for the loss of property tax in each of those years. As a result, the reserves at the end of the five year period, which are shown on Line 17, are reduced by an amount greater than the first year's loss in property taxes because of loss of interest earnings on those monies in 1992-93 and subsequent years. If it were the Boards' desire to recoup those taxes lost the first year then the user fees would have to be increased accordingly in subsequent years over what is shown on Line 22. Following is a summary of the impact on each District for the two scenarios: (4 of 6) T Staff Report re State's Proposed Shift of Districts' Property Taxes/Options August 18, 1992 Impact of 1992-93 Tax Loss if Made up by Reserves $8.5 Minion (25%) Tax Loss $34.2 Million Tax Loss Reduction in Reserves Reduction in Reserves 1992-93 1992-93 District Tax Loss 1992-93 By 1996-97 Tax Loss 1992-93 By 1996-97 1 $ 515.000 $ 534,000 $ 739,000 $2,060,000 $2,136,000 $ 2.836,000 2 2,277,000 2,361,000 3,131,000 9,105,000 9,440.000 12,539,000 3 2,916,000 3,028,000 4,073,000 11,665,000 12,114,000 16,299,000 5 704,000 730,000 970,000 2,816,000 2,920,00D 3,878,000 6 367,OOD 381,000 511,000 1,467,000 1,523,000 2,048,000 7 1,107,000 1.147,000 1,522,000 4,430,000 4,593,000 6,098,000 11 663,000 687,000 913,000 2,652,000 2,749,000 3,651,000 Total J8 549 000 a 968 000 $11,859.000 $34,195.000 $35.475.000 147.349.000 3. Increase User Fees The third option is to offset the loss of property tax revenues by increasing user fees in an amount equivalent to recover a portion or the full amount of the loss. Unfortunately, there is a practical problem as well that may dictate what alternatives the Boards have for 1992-93. As the Directors are aware, we collect our annual sewer user fees on the property tax bill because it is the most cost-effective way to do it. In order to do this the County Auditor requires that we have our user fee rates to them on computer tapes by August 24th, which requires that they be processed several days in advance of that. Since the Governor and State Legislators have failed to come to terms on the state budget as of this writing, we have effectively missed this cut-off date. However, it may be that a supplemental tax bill could be issued and staff and counsel are looking into this possibility. There are certain obvious downsides to issuing a supplemental tax bill reflecting a fee increase. V (5 of 6) Staff Report re State's Proposed Shift of Districts' Property Taxes/Options August 18, 1992 The enclosed updated cash flaws (blue and gold) reflect the impact on the Districts' financial position of increasing the user fee to make up for the property tax shortfall in 1992-93 and subsequent years. Basically, this alternative keeps the Districts in the exact same fiscal position as if there were no property tax shift; ie., as already budgeted for 1992-93 (see white cash flows) , except that user fees would be increased to replace property taxes lost, as summarized below: Fee Increase to Raise $8.9 M1111on Fee Increase to Raise $34.2 Million Adopted 1992-93 25% Tax Loss 1992-93 200% Tax Loss 1992-93 District SFR Fee Fee Increase SFR Fee Fee Increase SFR Fee 1 $ 75.00 $ 6.97 (+ 9%) $ 81.97 $ 27.88 (+ 37%) $102.88 2 60.00 8.63 (+14%) 68.63 34.52 (+ 58%) 94.52 3 60.00 10.38 (+17%) 70.38 41.54 (+ 69%) 101.54 5 75.00 26.53 (+35%) 101.53 106.13 (+142%) 181.13 6 65.00 8.57 (+13%) 73.57 34.25 (+ 53%) 99.25 7 40.00 11.15 (+28%) 51.15 44.64 (+112%) 84.64 11 60.00 13.03 (+22%) 73.03 57.09 (+ 95%) 112.09 13 100.00 _00 100.00 _00 100.00 Avg 60.01 IlLa +17% 70.13 40.80 +68X 300.81 JWS:sc Enclosures (6 of 6) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 0 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA August 13, 1992 1O ELus AVENUE Fo.Box 6127 FOUMAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 9MBE127 m4I S62-2411 `...' STAFF REPORT 1992-93 SEWER USE FEES BACKGROUND During the 1980's and early 1990's, each of the Districts considered and adopted a sewer use fee for ongoing operations, maintenance and rehabilitation costs. Although property taxes, connection fees and federal and state construction grants have historically been the major sources of financing of Districts' activities, they became inadequate during this period. Since the passage of Proposition 13, all ad valorem property tax revenue has been used in the Operating Funds for maintenance, operations, rehabilitation and retirement of certificates of participation and none has been available for capital improvements. To keep pace with the stringent requirements of the federal, state and regional regulatory agencies for advanced wastewater treatment and air emissions control, all Districts except No. 14 review their user fee annually. No adjustment was made to the fees for 1992-93. The average annual fee for a single family residence is $60. District No. 14 is fully funded by the IRWD. In addition to new regulatory requirements, cost increases are also generally attributable to inflation, to additional flows generated by the natural population increases from the excess of births over deaths and in-migration. Federal and state assistance from the clean water grant program has been eliminated by Congress because of federal funding problems. As a part of the State of California budget deliberations for 1992-93, the Legislature and the Governor have currently proposed diverting all or a portion of the historical share of the property tax which has heretofore been allocated to special enterprise districts. For the Sanitation Districts this amounts to a reduction in budgeted revenue for 1992-93 of between $8.9 million (25%) and $34.2 million (100%), based on the two alternative proposals under consideration. The purpose of this report is to examine the impact of this significant loss of revenue upon the previously adopted user fees of each District. FUTURE FINANCING PROJECTIONS The attached Statement of Projected Cash Flows for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 (white) have been prepared in accordance with the adopted 1992-93 budgets and the "2020 VISION" Financial Plan recommendations that each District's share of the treatment plant construction, and its respective trunk sewer construction Y 1992-93 Sewer Use Fees Page 2 August 13, 1992 projects, be financed by a combination of increased connection fees to pay for new capacity and borrowing to pay for rehabilitation and improved treatment. Debt �..� retirement and escalating operating and maintenance costs would now be paid by increasing the annual sewer use fees, or dipping into reserves since reduced or no property taxes will be available under the following assumptions: 1. Renewal of NPDES Permit and Continuation of Current Treatment Levels (3011h1 Waiver) This scenario continues to represents the minimum probable level of construction, rehabilitation and operations and maintenance costs. For the first five years of the planning period, the differences between renewal of our existing permit and full secondary treatment are not significant. Additional sewage flow and sewer connection assumptions are also consistent with the Master Plan. 2. Connection Fees The capital facilities connection fee includes the cost of future and existing facilities on a per unit basis. The reason to include future costs is that we any new flow will require new additional capacity. The connection fee policy provides for an annual adjustment of fees to reflect changes in the Engineering News Record-LA Construction Cost Index. A fee �.�✓ increase of 5% per year is projected in the cash flows for the years 1993-94 through 2001-02. The 1992-93 fee has been left at the 1991-92 level in accordance with a prior Board action. 3. Debt Over the next 10 years, all of the Districts except Nos. 13 and 14 are projected to issue COP-type debt to meet a portion of Joint Works treatment facilities improvements. Borrowing has been a part of the long-range financial plan for capital improvements since the policy of using all property tax revenues for operations, maintenance and rehabilitation was implemented. Extensive use of the now discontinued Federal and State Clean Water Grant Program enabled the Districts to stretch out their reserves and other income and to avoid borrowing until now. Three primary reasons to issue debt are: to protect and to preserve capital reserves; to avoid major increases and fluctuations in user fees from year-to-year; and to spread the cost of facilities over their useful lives. 1992-93 Sewer Use Fees Page 3 August 13, 1992 The cash flow projections include regularly scheduled COP issues through 1995- 96 to meet capital project award and cash flow requirements, and to avoid federal interest earnings restrictions on unspent proceeds. The "2020 VISION" Financial Plan projected borrowing approximately $750 million and the Directors may want to extend this plan through 1996-97 in order to reach that target. 4. Reserves As a part of the financial plan developed by the financial team of the Fiscal Policy Committee, staff and consultants, the Boards have implemented a plan to build reserves for certain future events. The approved reserve policy calls for Dry-Period Reserves, Operating Contingency Reserves, Capital Project Reserves, Environmental Requirement Reserves, and Insurance Reserves. When an adequate funding level for these reserves has been reached, a Fee Stabilization Fund will be created. Increasingly stringent environmental standards at the federal, state, regional and local levels, as well as inflationary trends, have made it clear that user fee rates will have to increase - and at an accelerated pace - to maintain each District's financial integrity. However, there are several unknowns that could have a major impact on the projected cash flow requirements, including completion schedules for major facilities and the renewal of the Districts' 301(h) permit. The attached schedules assume all projects are completed as planned and may be considered worst case, or most costly, scenarios with the exception of the 301 (h) issue. ANNUAL USER FEE HISTORY The sewer use fee program methodology is identical in each of the Districts; the only difference is the schedule of rates charged to the various categories of users, since each District's financial situation varies. The adopted programs are in accordance with the Districts' adopted Revenue Program required by the Federal Clean Water Act, and have been approved as "fair and equitable" by the State Water Resources Control Board. The user fees are collected as a separate line item on the annual County of Orange property tax bills. District No. 1 In late 1984, District No. 1 modified its long-range financial plan to include a supplemental sewer use fee. The initial fee was set at $60 per year for a single- family residence. Before the 1985-86 fees could actually be assessed, the 301 )h) waiver was granted and the fees were reduced to $26.40 per year based upon water meter size. 1992-93 Sewer Use Fees Page 4 August 13, 1992 In August 1986, the State Water Resources Control Board revised their ruling that �..' water meters provided a "fair and equitable" distribution of costs and required the District to change the user fee to a flat rate charge of $26.40 per year for 1987-88. Because of significant financial shortfalls in 1988, District No. 1 declared their intent to increase their use fee 30% annually in order to maintain their financial integrity. For the 1988-89 year, the Board again reviewed the Districts' long-range financial plan and subsequently increased the use fee to $34.32 per year. The single-family residential rate was $45.00 for 1989-90, $55.00 for 1990-91 AND $75.00 FOR 1991-92 AND 1992-93. The Master plan adopted in 1989 projected a fee of $100 by 1992-93. District No. 2 The District No. 2 Board approved the initial user fee for the District for 1990-91, and set the single-family residential rate at $55.00 per year. During the user fee adoption process, the Directors and the public were informed that the annual fee was projected to increase and could be as high as $75.00 for 1991-92. The rate adopted for 1991- 92 and 1992-93 was $60.00 for a single-family residence, consistent with the 1989 Master Plan. District No. 3 After several years of discussion, the District No. 3 Board adopted the sewer use fee program in March 1989 for the 1989-90 fiscal year in the amount of $30.36 per year. Future fees were expected to increase, but were not projected pending completion of the 30-year Master Plan. Major rehabilitation/repair of manholes damaged by corrosion, increasing costs described above, and the need to repay existing and future COP-type debt, required a rate increase for 1990-91 to $50.00 The single-family residential rate of $60.00 for 1991-92 and 1992-93 is below the Master Plan projection of $100 for 1992-93. District No. 5 The first District to implement a user fee was District No. 5 in 1981 . The initial fee for a single-family residence was $26.40 per year, based on water meter size. When the program was originally presented to the public and adopted by the Board, it was anticipated that it might be necessary to increase the fee by approximately 77%, beginning in the second year, to finance the rehabilitation work on the trunk sewer system. With the exception of the state mandated change from a water meter basis to a flat-rate basis, the rates were unchanged until 1989-90 because of the decline in b 1992-93 Sewer Use Fees r Page 5 August 13, 1992 inflation, favorable bids on rehabilitation projects, delays in major plant projects and unexpected incases in assessed valuations. In accordance with the Master plan and to smooth the transition to the rates needed to retire future debt, the Board adopted the first increase in user fees effective 1989-90, with a single-family residential rate of $45.00 per year and increased it to $55.00 in 1990-91, The rate for 1991-92, $75.00 per year, continued the process recommended in the Master Plan and was consistent with the rate projected in the Master Plan. Maintaining that fee for 1992-93 brought the District below the Master Plan projection of $100. District No. 6 In 1983, District No. 6 became the second Sanitation District to implement a sewer use fee. During the public workshops and hearing, the public was advised that the fee was expected to increase substantially from the $26.40 per year for a single- family residence in the first year, to $46.80 per year in the second year, to cover rising costs and then remain at the increased level. However, the District was able to delay any fee increase until 1986-87, due to a decline in inflation rates, receipt of favorable bids on construction and rehabilitation projects, delays in project schedules, a significant increase in assessed valuation of certain parcels in 1984-85, and the positive impact of the formation of District No. 14. The assessed valuation increase was reversed by the County Assessor in 1986- 87, however, and the use fee was increased by 10% to $29.04 for 1986-87, 10% to $31 .68 for 1987-88, 10% to $38.02 for 1988-89, and 14% to $49.00 for 1989- 90 (the 1989-90 fee was slightly above the fee originally predicted for 1984-85), and 12% to $55.00 for 1990-91 . The fee for 1991-92 and 1992-93, $65.00 for a single-family residence, reflected a necessary continuation of the fee increase to cover rising costs described above and to provide for debt service. The fee is below the $75.00 fee in the Master Plan projections. District No. 7 District No. 7 was the last of the Districts to adopt a user fee to supplement the property tax revenues. The 1991-92 year was the initial year of user fees and the rate was set at $40.00 for a single family residence; below the $50.00 fee projected in the Master Plan. The same fee and projection applies to 1992-93. 1992-93 Sewer Use Fees Page 6 August 13, 1992 District No. 11 District No. 11 modified its long-range financial plan in 1987 to include a sewer use fee to address a shortfall in ad valorem property tax revenues and to provide additional financing necessary for operations and maintenance and major facilities rehabilitation/repair. The use fee for a single-family residence was set at $26.40 per year for 1988-89, and was projected to be $45.00 per year by 1990-91. The Board adopted a fee of $40.00 per year for 1989-90. The increased costs described earlier and the need to repay debt issued in 1990-91 and 1991-92 required an increase in the single-family residential use fee to $60.00 for 1991-92. This fee was again adopted for 1992-93 and is lower than the $150 projected in the 1989 Master Plan. District No. 13 District No. 13 has never received ad valorem property tax revenues as a result of protracted tax exchange negotiations and settlement with the County, which ultimately led to the formation of the District. When District No. 13 was formed in 1985, the Directors set the annual use fee at $70.00 per household, higher than the fees in other Districts, as no property tax revenue is received by the District. A connection fee schedule was also implemented at that time to pay for additional facilities to serve new development. Despite increased costs of operating and maintaining the joint treatment facilities for the reasons described above, the sewer use fee in District No. 13 has increased only twice because proportionately higher development has spread fixed costs over more properties. In 1988-89, the fee was increased 12% to $78.40 per year, and for 1990-91 the annual fee was increased to $95.00 for a single-family residence. The fee adapted for 1991-92 and 1992-93, $100.00 for a single-family residence is lower than the $135 projected in the Master Plan for the slow growth assumption. CURRENT USER FEE ALTERNATIVES With the diversion by the State of between $8.9 million and $34.2 million from current operating fund revenues, the Directors may wish to reconsider the previously adopted user fees for 1992-93. In order to change the user fees on the 1992-93 property tax bills, any changed rates must be given to the County Auditor-Controller by August 24, 1992. Any actions now will not allow sufficient time for the County Data Center to prepare a tape for the Auditor-Controller, and will not be reflected on the regular tax bills until 1993-94 when the annual fees will again be considered. 1992-93 Sewer Use Fees i Page 7 August 13, 1992 In the hope of an additional extension or a revised tax bill, the Directors may decide `..l to increase the user fees to make up for the property taxes taken by the Governor and the Legislature. These fee adjustments are categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements. Fee Increase to Raise $8.9 Million Fee Increase to Raise $34.2 Million Adopted 1992-93 25% Tax Loss 1992-93 100% Tax Loss 1992-93 District SFR Fee Fee Increase SFR Fee Fee Increase SFR Fee 1 $75.00 $6.97 $ 81.97 $27.88 $102.88 2 60.00 ° 8.63 68.63 34.52 94.52 3 60.00 10.38 70.38 41.54 101.54 5 75.00 26.53 101.53 106.13 181.13 6 65.00 8.57 73.57 34.25 99.25 7 40.00 11.15 51.15 44.64 84.64 11 60.00 13.03 73.03 57.09 112.09 13 100.00 .00 100.00 .00 100.00 14 .00 _00 _00 _00 _00 Average S 60.01 S10e12 S 70.13 $A-O 80 $100.81 The attached Statements of Cash Flow (blue and gold) have been prepared to show the effect of raising the user fee to compensate for the entire amount of property taxes to be lost. The effects of missing the deadline or electing not to increase the 1992-93 fees foregoing the lost taxes and increasing fees for 1993-94 and subsequent years are shown on the attached green and tan schedules. No action is required by Districts 13 or 14 as District 13 has never received any property tax revenue and District 14 is fully funded by the IRWD. KRF DOC%SEWER.FERMMUSEFEE.1 emn: cF_s3e.zLs_Io:43 PM 1992-93 Budget Fees Same As 1991-92 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.1 THRU 14 8/I71111 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pass FISCAL YEARS 1992-1983 THROUGH 2001-2002 DYesr?arot SYeer Total LINE 199293 1993.94 1994.95 1995-96 199697 1991-1987 18933002 10-Yser Taal USE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 2 Partners 6 Carry Over Fears last Year 113,590,000 122.348.000 130,470.260 134.994.750 139,0113,500 113.680.000 143,787.100 113.60,b0 2 3 REVENUE 3 0 Stare of 1%Tax AIIvcNvn 31,195,000 35,563.000 36.985,000 30.485,030 b,004.00D 105.312.000 228,335,000 41o,647.000 1 5 Feu:Indueulel Waste 8,895,000 6,780.000 3]93,000 8,967.000 10,313.000 39.752,000 79,900.000 119.732,000 5 6 User Faee 51.108.000 60,322,000 BB.b1,000 78,410,000 09,625,000 318,454,000 634,330.000 880.780,000 6 T Isuama 6 Meeellemaus Ims— 8.446,000 8pS%000 9,08,000 9,800000 10,102,000 46,978.000 511,993.000 106,073.00o T 8 Transfer from COP Funds L889.000 2.011.000 2,380,000 2.1179,000 2,797.000 11.326.000 12.806.000 26.620,000 0 9 Other Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 10 TOTAL REVENUE 102,684,000 111.126.000 135,039,000 139.329.000 181.041.000 630019.000 912,631.000 1,642,880,OOo 10 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 216.384,000 234,874.000 266.609.250 2)3.322,750 281,724.600 343,819.000 1.066.319,6a0 1.066.1W.000 11 12 EXPENDITURES 11 13 Share ofJOIM Wok$M 8 0 49,049,000 81.011.000 56,112.000 61,714,000 67,998,000 286,393,000 455.978,000 741.369.000 13 14 Co -fi.a Swtem M 6 O end Other OF— 11.316.000 10.121.000 10,622,000 I1,15Q000 I1,703,000 64,912,000 67.821.000 122.734.000 14 18 COP Service 33,672,000 43,231.150 53.780 800 60.5ee,160 60,330.000 268,626,5011 341of 124070 ssfa6w8,6T0 15 IB TOTAL EXPENDITURES 83,53e.000 104,403J60 120.611.500 183,440.260 147,933,000 599,831,580 Is"Al0,070 IA61]41,630 is IT Reserves 8 Cm,Over 10 Nam Year 121.148.000 130,430.250 134.894J60 138,883,500 143,787,500 143,387.500 IB I,b8,430 101.408,420 17 18 Nam Year's Ory Period WndlnO ReWlremenis 16,803.000 51.199.0DD 69,288,M0 86,670,000 32,041,000 72.842,0011 94,880000 94,Mg 19 IB 20%Co.the vncy Reserve 18.708.000 20.BW.A 14,103,900 26,899.200 3B.687'800 29.587.800 38.497.400 38.493,400 I9 20 Unvpprop of Potion of lmurvnce Fee— 58,13T,000 9%291.250 51.600,950 Q.519.300 41.36T.)Oo 41.367.700 68.331.030 60.331,030 20 21 User Fee framPeallea - 11 12 Slams Fatally Resler—Lear Fee 4. 693 178 999 flat 0129 21 13 NumMr at Equlvalms Owelllnp UNm 844,704 246.374 049.694 984,124 $59. 09 809.604 23 24 Estimated Law Fees.ExslWes IRWD 50.698.000 66,922.000 60.401,000 78,319,000 88,125,OOo 114.SGS,43O 24 1992-93 Budget CF,aM...e_N.+m..9+.N_e..r Fees Same As 1991-92 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.1 6I17I93 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW P.,1 FISCAL YEARS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2001.2002 1992,997 19973002 UNE 199293 109344 1994-95 1935 Be 199497 6 Year Told 5-Year Total WY...Feral LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 2 Res..8 CerTOoer From Lee,Year 9,135,000 11376 000 8,039,750 1126E 250 B 101 OW 9,135,000 10,978,000 8 13fi 000 2 3 REVENUE 3 4 She.of 1%Too MI-seOn 2,060,000 2,142,000 2,218.000 2.311.000 2,410.000 11,ls7.= 13,671.000 24,728,000 4 5 Pees:Industrial We.,. 400.. 460,000 528,000 MR." a99,000 2,696,00D 5,425,000 0,121,000 5 a Use.No. 6,841,Ow 7.025.00a 8.801.000 10,])4.000 12,000.000 44,811.000 60g5).000 111,36B.000 6 ] IMerael6 68welleneeur lneeme 611.00s, 572.000 667,000 we." 701,000 3,057,000 5,096,000 8.153,000 ) 8 Transfer from COP Fulls 281.000 274,000 308.000 338,w0 360.000 1.551,000 ll?W. w 3,301,000 B 9 OM.,Rewms O 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 8 10 TOTAL REVENUE 8893000 104730w 13523D00 14642000 TO.M000 6]3)2000 92289000 156671000 10' 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 18 0211 w0 18,849,000 20,682,750 22,911,260 26,001.000, 72.W7.. 103 2])000 164 we w 11 12 EXPENDITURES 12 13 Share of JolnlYl M 6 0 4,e75,000 4.902,000 5,]01,000 5.831.000 0,824,000 17.434.000 43.810.000 71.234.000 13 14 Colledlan S's.M i 0 and Goal*:H. aw,w0 683,000 )1].000 763.000 791,000 3.694.000 4,585,000 S.1BB,w0 14 16 COP Smite 4,320,000 6123 2w 61185,100 7,066,250 7,700,000 30 611 000 311540 000 eB O510w 16 i6 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 9053000 10808250 12284600 13760250 16023000 61628000 88846000 149474w0 16 17 Rewm.6 Cwrv,G er to Next Year 0,376.000 9,939.760 8,268,250 9,161.wO 10,078,000 I6.978,000 10,332.000 16,332.000 17 IS Neal Year's Dry Pe4ed Purding Res lremeMs 4,827,000 6,eGeoct, 6.147.000 0.876.000 7.512.0DD ].EIZ.. 9.613,000 8.613.000 1B 19. 20%CominBewy Reeem 1931000 2102000 1458000 3)5D000 ILcolLocal 3006000 3846000 38411000 10 10 PeNen of I......Reserves 1,617,001) 473,760 337)wl 4640w 461001] IBI 000 3 B)4000 BN wO 20 21 21 22 Waste Fmtlly Residence User Fee 075 195 6120 0145 I170 $175 22 23 Number of Ewhdenl Dxdllrq Units 73,Bw 73.9w 74,Ow 74.3w 74,591) ]],090 23 14 ENmwed User Fees 16,641,000 Q.02S,000 68.891.. I10J74.000 F12,880,000 113.480.7501 24 o,eeAFle N1 aN..r 1992-93 Budget Fees Same As 1991-92 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.2 BIDS, STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pace 1 FISCAL YEARS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2O013002 F Year Total S Year Total LINE 199243 190304 1994-96 188680 1N697 1992-0887 19972002 I0.Yeer TOtat LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 2 Reserves A Cen,Cnor From Last Year 2984300E 274b000 2e090000 29911100D i1 W8000 26843 36487000 28843000 I 3 REVENUE 3 4 Show.all%Teo Anwation 9.10S. I 9.409,000 8.848,000 10,24l ODD I0.982.000 48.310,000 60.001,000 108.217,000 4 S Feee:IMueWN Will 2.260,000 2.668,000 2.876,000 3.433.000 3,836,000 16.171,000 30.612,000 46,683,000 6 a Ueer Fees 16.927,000 19,W6,OW 22.608.000 ]e,)23,000 W,996.OW 111,019.000 166,860,OW 280,478,000 a ) Nor—,A MI.aNlencaur,1.. 119071Mp 1,917.00D 1.984.000 2.117,0001 2.348,000 10,314,000 16,379.000 26.693.000 > a Trenaler lrem COP Funds 622,000 1113,000 712.000 801.000 837.000 3,486.000 1.178.000 ).SW., 0 9 Other R.--. 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 B 10 TOTAL REVENUE 20611000 33122000 3809/1000 433060W 49)68000 1e2e06000 2)692)000 40883200D 10 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 6e464000 606010W 66169 )122] 90377000 2197411 311411000 496Wfi OW 11 12 EXPEND RES 12 13 Sion.of bl.Wake M A O 15.789.000 111.660.000 18,214.000 20,036,000 22.039.000 92,636.000 148,006,000 240,MOOD 13 14 Collection System MA O she Other Once. Q099,000 2,204,M 2.014,00D 2,430,000 2.662,000 11,689.000 14,810,000 28,408,000 14 Is COP,S.Mee 11088000 13780000 16>12000 181W 000 20299000 80027000 101223000 181249000 I6 Is TOTAL EXPENDITURES 211974000 326/3000 3)240000 40618000 4408000D 1842811)OO 264037000 449298000 to 17 R..... L C.,,O-r to No.Year 27.4e0.000 28.000.000 28,91e.00D 31,We,000 36,487,000 36.I97.000 47.377.00O 47.3)).000 I> IB Nan Yeeie Dry Polar!FUMOp R-11fiemenu 14.497.000 16,27I.000 18,620,000 20,308.000 22,N6,OOD 22.446,000 29.499.01 29,498,000 10 19. 20%Centuries ,Reserve 6798000 6508000 7448000 8123000 8878000 a. SOOD I180G000 11800000 18 20 Pereenaflnsureno.R.— 7198001) 6281000 2860OW 3177000 406IOW 4004000 0070000 BO)90W 20 21 Lear Fee Pete 21 22 Sinai.Friendly Incidence Ueer Fee BW F70 086 I100 Ills 112D 22 23 Nomaer of E40NNant D-21,Loan 203.783 264.350 2116.608 267,233 289,533 201.033 I3 24 EoVmetW Veer Fees 116,827,000 119,606.000 $22,659,000 F28.723.000 130,996,000 432.726.9W 24 1992-93 Budget ryneivab&3me"A'ale l Fees Same As 1991-92 COUMY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.3 8/1792 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Paul FISCAL YEARS I992-1993 THRMON 200I-Mat &Year TOW &Year TOW LIKE 1992.83 1983,94 199495 Images 199697 1992-1997 1897-2002 10-Yaer Tod LINE 1 OPERATOR FUND 1 2 Rosevear S CerMOom None Last Year 3453)000 3862 000 38)20000 3920000 38851000 34537000 38383000 39537000 2 3 REVENUE 3 4 sm.o11%Tw Ammeter 11.668,000 12.13;oo0 13.61T,000 13,1221" 13,647.000 63,183,000 )8,874,000 140,057,000 4 5 Fase:Mlusmtl Wnro 1,3o0,000 3.Ie6.000 2.513.000 2,990,000 3,324,000 12.812.000 25.))3,000 38,684,000 5 e Ueer Few 16.848,000 18,276.00) 31,142A00 14,01Pg000 2%9SS,000 107,309,000 1)9,)19,000 287p24,000 6 ImebN 6 Mlsaalwam,lmoma 1,619,W0 2.766A00 2.661,000 2.999,000 2.964,000 14.010.000 15.684.00D 29.674.000 ) 5 Transfer Dam COP wNe 59i.000 "7.0 M.= 6I5.00c, 978. o a,est000 4,8901000 8,77e,000 9 9 Omer Farmers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 9 10 TOTAL REVENUE 33636000 0s049000 38933 43979000 47201 201199000 303918000 504116000 10 II TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 66o)8000 )26)4000 )8es 93126000 87662000 236730000 34129900/1 53/1653000 11 12 EXPENDITURES 11 13 Sbero at Met Weeks M&0 16,899.000 17.47).000 19.22%000 31.145,000 22,293,000 9).)81.000 186,324.000 154.005.000 13 14 Caoea9On Swbm M&0 end mMr OPer. 4,436,000 3.900.000 3.045.000 3.167,000 3,357.000 16.934.000 19,476.000 2e.410,000 14 is COPSeMaa 103411000 166))OOo 17136 18830000 22649 62638 112SS007o 195588 A 16 Is TOTAL EWMDMRES i1119000 29954000 39409000 43276000 49268000 19)]5300D 288B60070 48S00307 1s 17 Reserns&Carry-Owr le NO"Yea 2e,e28,000 38.)30.000 39.247AW 39,861.000 38.363A00 3b,393,000 52.6481930 52.648,930 17 Is Neal Yea'.Ory Pulnd Pending Reatlrerm. 16,725.000 16.9)).000 19,703.000 21.638.000 24.635.000 24.835,090 3111T1.000 32. 70,000 IB 19. W%COMmew^y Ream. 9"O,ODO 8791000 7981000 9666000 9984000 8964000 12.B88 1 88000 18 10 Padeeel an..Reserve 14611000 14853000 11663 D00 5559000 3894000 3984000 7610930 7810930 W 21 Nv Fr Data 11 11 Single FmItlM seldas tearer Fee 460 Fes 476 ses $95 0145 22 23 Number of Eauleaert DbalOm Unlb 260.600 MISS 291.095 202.990 284,065 289,SSO 23 24 Eslimelnd Ueer Fen 416.90AM 419,179.000 921,141,000 424.054.000 026,986,000 641,9gG.M 24 en]n>_e:..R.-.N,t 1992-93 Budget Fees Same As 1991-92 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.6 911792 STATEMEN)OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pass 1 FISCAL YEARS IS92-1993 THROUGH 2MI 2002 &Veer Toml S-Yeer Total LINE 1992-93 190394 1894-96 1905-9e I990-87 19921997 1897-2002 10Yaar Total LINE 1 OPERAMNO FUND 1 2 Roaemse a Ca ,,Owr From Lem Year 9780000 10090000 11117000 11690. 11880600 87610011 118]e 600 8I91000 2 3 REVENUE 3 09me al far Tax Allocation 2.810,000 2.829,000 3,OI0,000 3.100.000 3.205,000 16,251,000 19.602,000 33,81E,000 1 5 Fese:Intentional Waste 50.000 00,000 e7,000 77.000 98,000 301,000 987,000 IA30.0W 5 6 Ueer Fen 1,880,000 2,131,000 2.377.O00 2.424.000 2.673,000 11.306,000 t6,161,000 29,64%. 6 ) herarast 6 Msaelleneus lrwome 959,000 )1)A00 803.000 831.000 B40,0p0 3.879.000 1.2I9.000 8,097.000 ) 9 Tr en.far lnm COP Front. 311,000 I14.000 I01,000 110.000 131,000 908,000 930.000 1,499.00O 9 9 Dan.Rewwa 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 le TOTALREVENUE S828o00 8809000 030000 8610000 0828000 31738000 39208000 70988000 10 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 1/812000 16,079,000 17101000 19339000 18810500 /0622000 51154600 79770000 11 1I EXPENDITURES 12 13 Share of Joint Works M 80 1.795,000 1.972,000 21O59,000 2,268,000 2,O03,000 IO.473,000 I0.736.000 27.209." 13 14 Conceder,8ymmnt M 60 am 01Mt O". 769,000 )8),000 037,000 g8,000 823,000 0,185,000 0.25I.000 8,617.000 11 16 COP S.M.. 1979000 3283000 2970000 3306500 ]16]000 1]91)500 17315Om0 31232600 15 10 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 182I000 1882000 8))1000 94I9600 091901,0 21158b600 38103000 87889500 10 O Reeama 9 CerMOwr n Ne0 Year 10,080,. If.11).000 11,080,000 11,009,FA0 11.930,500 II,1139.600 11J91,500 I8,701.500 17 19 Neel Year's ON Perlol FUMIn9 ReeelNmonle 2.261.000 2,181.000 2.897,000 3,225,000 3,439.000 ],1]8,000 1.327,000 1,327.000 1B IB 20%Commi9erroy Ross. 901000 883000 1165000 12900OD 3 1 e el lnmenas Rm ]9000p ) 0 30 p )B 5 0 3W 23 6 733 W8 30 21 USER FEE DATA 22 91nme Fairly Residence User Fee 11S I80 18S 190 e95 1120 22 23 Munster of Equivalent Carrier,Units 29.633 28.033 26.783 26.933 27.083 I7.033 23 24 EellmeteE User Fsee 11.880,000 12,131,000 102,2]).000 12,424.000 12,573.000 $3,339.9e0 24 1992-93 Budget 29w w.ea Fees Salle As 1991-92 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.B 611793 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pa..1 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1983 THROUGH 2001-2002 5 Year Total 6 Year Total ❑NE 1992-93 1983.94 1984-96 198688 1990-97 1992-199, 188)Q002 IO Year Total LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 2 Reeeme A CerMOYer From Lees Year 8,741,000 )920000 II OB8 000 )991000 6,976,001) 6,741,000 6,682,000 0]41 000 2 3 REVENUE 3 4 Share of I%Tax Aloaellen 1,487,000 1.520,008 1,587.000 1.9w." 1,)IB.000 7,940.W 9.086.000 17.011,000 4 5 F...:IMuelml Wee. 1761000 101,000 231.000 268,000 300,000 1,179.000 2.376.000 3,554.O00 5 B U...Fee. ].)04,000 3,CO3,000 3,314.000 3.447.00O 3.871,000 10.128,000 30,036,000 45,163,000 6 ] Imam.,&asseell.n...Irmame 631.000 670,000 698,000 547,000 460,000 1706.000 1p21." 4,320,000 ) 9 Trmeler from COP Fund. 33,000 03,00O 82,000 114,000 121,000 422.000 870.0m0 992,000 B 9 Other Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 10 TOTAL REVENUE 4989000 6371000 6723000 e024000 6271000 10300000 44168000 )393B OOO 10 11 TOTAL AVAIUBLE FUNDING 11 ]]0000 12981000 13 787 000 13915 ODO 13250000 ]6121000 48819000 79377000 11 11 EXPENDITURES 12 U Share of Jgnt We*$MB O 1.6)],000 1.699.000 2.989,000 3,366.000 3,593,000 161100,000 24.127,00O ]8,22],000 13 14 CMeatlen 9yetem M 6 0 eM Other O,r. 301.000 31E.. 332.000 349.000 356,000 1,864.000 2,110000 3,784,000 14 I6 COP Samoa 123fi000 1011000 2596000 3324000 ]]29000 1]]96000 18645000 31440000 16 19 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4110000 4828000 6899000 6938000 7688000 19968000 44892000 74461003 1B I) Ra-min 6 Carry-Owr to NoM Year 7.620,000 8,069,000 7,881,000 8.878,000 5,561,000 Sene00 4,92S,. 4,826.000 11 IB He.Year.Dry Part"Femurs R.,im arm. 2.05S.. 2.403,000 2,949,000 3,470.000 3,944,000 3,944,000 4.991.000 4.881.000 IB 19. 20%Con9n9enoy Re.ama 822,000 886 200 1 1)9 200 1,387,801) 1 fi3)600 1.537.600 1 999 300 1 922 300 18 10 Pool..of Insurance R.... 4,743,000 4 816 900 3)63 000 1118 200 IBO 40o 190 400 12 051 3001 .111 2001 20 21 USER FEE DATA 21 22 Shale Family Retldeme User Fee 0Bs 970 076 $80 88S Ot)O 23 13 Number el Fwlrad.al Demilirq UN. 42.830 42.800 42.990 43.090 43,190 43.0.0 23 24 Eetlmeted User Fea. 02,794,000 93,002,O0D 43,224.000 93,447.000 03,571,O0D 9].41].300 24 .nent..9.Rr-.pl 1992-93 Budget Fees Same As 1991-92 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.) 6117N2 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pagel FMCAL YEARS 1992.1903 THROUGH 2O013002 5 Va.,TaW &veer TOM LINE 1992-93 1993-94 199"S 199&96 19B&97 19934997 1997-200 10- ens Taal LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 2 R.. .B C.,YOs,From Len Yeas 14,790,000 - 1))83 21,238.090 23 BM 18841.M 13709000 276211000 13798000 1 B REVENUE 2 4 SM.of 196 Tax Alke.d n 4,430,000 4.60).000 4.791.000 4.988,000 S.i&L000 23,993.000 19.189,000 93.IB3.000 4 5 Pass:bluelON Wen. 84D,a00 9e6,0D0 1,111,000 1,278,000 1,470,000 5,86%ga0 11,405.000 17.070,00D 5 6 Uaes Fee. 3,969,00D 3.9)).000 3.993,000 4.017A00 4,049.000 20,005.000 22.291,000 42.296.000 6 Mass.,&AS...a. ..InOame 1.114.000 I,378.000 1.692,000 1J55,000 1.BBBp00 7,727.000 11.720,000 19.457,000 ) 9 Transfer Mae COP Funds 10,000 114,000 16$000 191,a00 199,000 810,Og0 970.000 1,790,000 6 9 Slew Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 10 TOTALREVENUE 10W.= 11052000 11846000 1322/000 11)88000 6/110000 >6505. 0 133)98000 10 I I TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 24.299.0110 I9 a8 32.974.000 80090000 30,629,000 72,000,001) 103,213,000 147,394,001D 11 12 EXPENDITURES 12 11 sense 0l islas Sines I'd IS 0 2,708.000 1.936.1)00 ],]26,000 ],6b,OW 3.904,000 16.410,000 26.214.000 42,614.OD0 I] 14 Collection BYalemM 6 0 and Olew Oes. TIUSL000 1.867,000 1.)60.000 1.9]8,000 1.BMI,OOD 8.))2.000 11,188.000 19.97IAOD - 14 15 COP Serene 3130 200>000 4042000 411113000 516)000 19186000 25838000 46038000 1fi 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 6510000 )60)000 9018000 10219000 11001000 443810/0 8324>000 107629000 18 17 Reserves&Cerr,Owrm Nen Va., 17,003,000 21.220,000 13,856,00, 16,1141.000 31.429,000 2).628,000 38,966.000 39,866pYU 17 19 Nen Vanes Dry Pealed Feeding Regulr.nenls 2,260,000 3.804,000 /,600,000 6.120.000 S.601.DDO 6,601.000 6,869,OaD g.699.000 18 19 20%Contingency Release IiW000 162100D I0U4000 2049000 3222 1200000 S)83000 3>a 000 IV 20 Persian el lneurams Rasern 1]122000 1fi00foa0 1)6a 000 IB ai 000 1991)OOD 1991>000 ]. 24000 TO 214000 20 21 USER FEE DATA 21 21 Single FmMIy Reddems Um Pas B40 $40 so /4D I4g $46 22 26 Number of EWWalars Dwamlq UN1n 69.228 99.429 99.928 100.429 101.228 105,228 23 24 Esdmned Wes Pass a,Be9.Doo 13.977.000 13.993.000 14.017.000 44.049.000 e4.736.2W 24 1992-93 Budget Fees Same As 1991-92 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.11 811792 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH ROW Fear FISCAL YEARS 1992 1993 THROUGH 2O01 2002 6-Ye.Tawl 6Yeer TOW UNF 1992.93 199344 199495 199596 1990 97 1992-87 1987-2002 WYeer Tonal UNE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 2 Reaervee 6 CarrYOver Ron Lest Yew 12,240,000 13,246,0130 13,590,60D 13,293,500 13 62)000 13 2.0 000 1IJIS OOO 12,240,0001 2 3 REVENUE 3 • Snare a 1%Tax Allocation 2,652.000 2,759,000 2,988,000 2.983.000 3.102.000 14.283.000 17,473.ODO 21,838,000 5 FB..:Irsur16N warm 20o.ODo 322.000 370.000 426.000 490,000 1,688,000 3.8041 5,662.000 5 6 U..r Fare 3,055,000 3,306.000 3,602,000 4,1.5,000 {,69{,000 19,81e.00D 26,700.000 64,610,000 6 ) lrennt6 Nines.n.O..Ms. 901,D00 9.6.G00 9{),000 91a.00D 962.000 4,5e9,000 {,5)0.000 9,138.000 ) e Trarrtat Ran COP Furs. WIND 126,000 155,000 174,000 tar,DID 702,00D BDD,D08 1,602.000 e 9 Omer Ravwwe o D O 0 0 0 0 0 9 10 TOTAL REVENUE 8 96.000 7 01000 7,942,000 8.841.000 11.329.00L 10340 00D 02.447.00D 101)8)000 10 11 TOTAL AVAILAOLE FUNDING 1/119/000 20,719,001D 21 522 G00 21 934 M 21 968 TOO 62 680000 )A 30)0e0 116027 11 12 EXPENDITURES 12 13 Been of JdM Wehr M 6 0 2.809,aa0 2,343,000 3,237,000 3.581,000 3,917.000 16,497,000 28,307,000 42.))4.000 la H Catlweon Senate M6 O red Other Gen. 866,000 909,000 053.000 I.001,000 1,051,000 4,770.000 6.100,000 10.879.000 14 15 COP Samos 3276000 329)500 4030000 4,746600 6128000 19{)6000 266e0000 46116000 15 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 6949000 )1]6600 6229000 3307500 10096000 40720000 5904)000 99)9) 1s 17 Reserves 6 Cwry Owr to Non Year 13,245,000 13,580.500 13,293,500 12,827.000 11,890000 I1,aE0000 16.280,000 Ie.260.000 17 16 Nan Year'.D,P dW FYMIn9 9,14..enm 2.975,000 31563,000 4,115.000 {.65{.000 5.048,000 5.0.8,000 6,380.000 GADDING, 16 19- War Centln,ser,Reserve 1190500 1.429.000 1846000 1863000 3019 a00 3019000 I566000 3596000 10 20 PONrn 01 lneurwwe Reserve 8 000000 11683 500 7,532,500 B 111000 •)93 OCO 4 783 000 )31.000 7,314,001) 20 21 USER FEE DATA 21 22 91n91e Fees,Stairs—U...Fee ISO Iles 670 380 $90 also 22 2a Numeer at EODlvalan Owamrr9 Unit. 50.910 61.110 51,460 51.810 621180 53.910 23 24 Enist.lrs Uaer Fees 33,065,000 63.322,000 63,802.000 I{,1{6.000 34,699,000 08.e26,600 24 1992-93 Budget Fees Same As 1991-92 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.13 61,702 STATEMENT OF MOJECTED CASH FLOW Pees 1 RBCAL YEARS I992-1993 THROWN 2001-20D2 S-Y..r Tew 6.Yeer Tow UNE 1N243 I9103-84 1911 .95 1995.90 I998-87 1882I997 1997d0D2 MY—Tow UNE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 f Re.—.6 cao,OR.r From lnl Year 1 0111000 1136000 1.249.00fD 1.327.0041 130E 101E 000 1 421 1,010,000 2 f REVENUE J 4 Shen of 1%TO A110.etlen 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 4 5 F..:Ibu.UW W..Ie 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 6 W.,Fee. 674,000 6414,000 704.000 704.000 774.000 2.570.000 4,964.000 8.554,000 a ) I..M 6 Mwsll.moue Ineems 78.000 94.000 91.eV0 96.000, 10D,000 447.000 S15.OD0 962,000 T B Tnn1ar 08m COP Fund. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d 9 9 Other R.... O 0 D O 0 0 0 0 9 10 TOTALREVENUE MIDOO 70900D 796000 NO 074000 4017000 6499000 0510000 10 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING I768,= 1904000 2010M 2157M 2159 COD fiNf ODO •912000 10532000 11 12 E2PENDITUREB 11 IS Sh.r.ofmol WN2.M60 419,001) 44B.000 484.000 Ga.= 597.000 1,512,000 4,013.000 0.626,000 13 14 Cdl.o68n 9Wrm M A Oard OIMr OfFor. 1)].000 102.000 181.000 201.000 211.00) 9N.000 1,227,000 2,188.000 14 15 COP Sendoe a C00 59000 N000 N000 140000 Ib NO IN IB 16 TOTAL MPMOITNES NONO MOOD 713 ODD 272000 838000 3010000 11380000 9990000 18 17 R.....A C.wOver to N.d Year 1,138,00D 1,245.000 1,827,000 1.9e6.000 1.418.000 1,423.000 1,542.000 IM2.00D 17 18 Ned Year's Ow P.6.6 Fuwlne RogWr°menm 316.000 220.000 367,000 889,000 419,000 418.000 031,000 wl., 19 19- 20%Con9rq..00v R.... 89 1f1900 14 600 164400 18T 200 IBT 300 163200I 1B 10 Fu018n of Ine ...Ilonrvo Nfi 00D 783,1100 927 4N 844800 NT 800 et)900 BN 90O Sao 000 ID 21 USER FEE DATA 11 22 Wrrel.FC lRnN.—U.,F.. 6100 4100 FI00 0100 810D $110 21 23 Nun*or of EWNd.nl Dw.ln,UNM 8.740 8.840 7,040 7.240 ).)40 11,240 23 24 EeenweO User Fee. 6074p 1694.000 S704.000 8734.000 0774.000 51.238.400 a 8/1)92 CF 936.%LS 2:61 PM 25% Tax Diversion Fee Adj. 1992-93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.I THRU 11 8/17192 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH ROW Pe9a 1 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2001-2002 6Yoar Total 5-Yew TOUT USE - 199293 199394 1994.95 199698 199697 1992-1997 1917201 I0.Yen Te1Y LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 2 Ren Mr.6 C.110.1 From Lest Year 111.6901000 122J10.000 130.45).150 136003]50 139.883,500 110,590,000 113.789,60e 113,590,000 2 3 REVENUE i 1 Sham of I%Tax Anoeetien 25,818,000 20,672.000 27.139.000 28,149.00o 30,005.000 I38,BI I,OM 189,023,000 307.931.000 1 5 Feee:Industrial Wnte 61886,000 0.780.000 7,)9).00e 9,967. O 101313,000 39,752,001) 79,980,000 119,731.000 5 8 Ueer Feee 00,936,000 67,612,000 )),613,00D 98,035,000 98,126,000 392,)S6,000 699,075,000 901.031.000 1 In, 6 Mm.1twooua Income B,N1,OOo 9,O6g000 9,/)),000 B,BOO,om 10,102,000 I6,877,030 NA20,000 105.697.000 ) 9 Tumfer Imor COP Wrtla I.06%aac 2.011.000 2.390.000 2,679.004a 1.797.00e 11.736.000 I3,885,000 25.620.000 1 9 Done,Reveiwa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 TOTAL REVENUE 102.081A00 112.125.000 12S,0111000 138,330,000 151,863,000 630.031.000 910]83.000 1.610.814.000 10 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING ]18.]8t.000 231,9)1.000 166.M9.IM 2)].313.)M 281.316.500 713.611.000 1,061,572.600 1,051,101.000 11 12 EXPENDITURES 12 13 'Share of Join We*.M 6 0 18,010,000 51,0I1pW 66.112,000 01,724,000 07,898,000 285,393,00o 155,970.000 711A89,000 13 14 CWIeeOon Spam M B 0 ores Sam,Ormr. 11,316.000 10.121.000 10.022.000 11.1M,0IX1 11.703.000 M.912.001) 67.e2tmea 112.731.000 11 15 OOP 9.Mea 33.572.000 43,2)1J60 63.)00.600 80.556.2M 88,336,000 259.526.500 341.112.070 600108.6]D 18 18 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 93.636.M0 101.103.)60 120.511.600 133.110,2M 11).93).000 599,831,600 351,910,070 1.161.)11.5)0 16 17 Roarwa S CoUTOver to Non Yen 122,716,000 130A67.160 131.993J50 139,883,500 143]89.60o 110.789.60) 199,662.130 109,652:430 V IB Next Y.W.cry P.dM Press q RaWlmon.ma 15.803,000 51.299.000 59.386.000 65,678.000 72.912.011e 71,812,000 91,6M,000 81,630,000 19 19 20%ConJrgexF Reeerva 10.708.000 20,911e,000 21.103.000 16.699,200 29,69),900 21.69).300 38.197.100 36.49).1W 19 20 - Unepprop or Power,0f lmuresm Restores 6 `9,1]Sww000 r.286.3M 5A_y1,M39 rM 1g),518,3 t1,359A0o 4r_/In]69`.iM_ 66.606.030 fio.fi06.030 20 21 USER FEE DATA 21 22 Slni Fm9Y ReWnne User Fee 170,13 1))J6 089.04 1100d1 0112.17 Ir Ills6 22 23 Num6n0f E1uIMam Cemerq UNu 814]04 840d11 049.594 $54,124 859,M9 889.580 23 24 ENmalM Unr Fne,ExolWee IRWD 51,335,000 o5.912.000 7S,641,000 95,935,000 96,126,000 126.199.410 24 25% Tax Diversion .Xt�•n - ^"•+er Fee Adj. 1992-93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.1 ReMeM 6/I3fl2 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW P.,1 FISCAL YEARS 1912 1993 THROUGH 2O01 2002 1992 1997 1997 2002 LINE I992-93 119394 199495 198595 199097 S-Yew Tolel 64or Tolel 10�Y—To1J LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 2 Reurvee 5 Cnry-0wr Fmm bet veer 9,1 35 000 B J)6 000 8,039)60 B 26),250 8.160,00D 9113S.000 10 W)000 B tl5,000 2 3 REVENUE 3 6 Shore of l%Tev Allnnellon 1.566.000 1,6 ?., 1,671,030 1,738,000 1,80B4O00 8,368,000 I0.I111.000 18,550.000 e 5 Feee:InouNtlM Wool. A00.000 410,000 538,000 608.000 699.000 3.888,000 5,425,000 8,131.000 5 a Uu:Foe 6.056.000 7.560,000 9,61),000 11.363,000 13,283,000 0,599,000 68,816.000 11),563,000 6 InunH 6 Mlees11—oue I.. a11.000 572,00D 567,000 e06.000 701,000 3.067.000 61026,000 6,152,000 ) e Tremler frown COP Furde 281.000 27/,000 309,000 33e,000 350,000 1,551.000 1,75D000 3,30"ooto 8 8 OIM,Reverxre O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 10 TOTAL REVENUE 8883.000 10,473000 13523000 1400000 16BA0.000 633)1000 92.217000 156666000 10 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 1/1038000 18.11A13000 20561760 23910350 36000000 73506000 1G32)4000 164903000 11 12 EXPENDITURES 12 13 Sian of Joint WoA.M 6 0 4,676,000 4.903.000 6A82.000 61631,000 0,624.000 37A24,000 43.810.000 71.231.000 13 H Collmodn Splwn M a O eM OtMr Over. a... 6e3,000 )1),000 753,00D 79I.000 3,594.000 4.695.000 B.IBB.000 IA 15 COP a.Moe 4.329000 6R23.260 0105,W 7060150 ))08,000 30511000 3B.640,000 08051000 is 18 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 6.653,000 10908250 12394500 13)50.250 15023000 61529000 86,846.000 1494)4030 16 17 Rom.wee 6 CntyO"rto Next Year 8.375.000 $1039.7 0 8.287.260 9,ISOOOD 10,977,000 ID,9)),000 16.329,000 I8,328,000 17 to Next Yo•ie Dry P•Hod Fundl,RaWUermnte 4.927,000 5,404.000 6.I47.000 S,876.000 7,513,000 7.613.000 9.613,000 9.e13,000 IB 19. 20%COnllnl.m,Reeew 1931,000 2.162,000 3459000 275000D 3,OOS,OW 3,006000 3,845000 3816000 19 20 Ponlon of lmurerme Reurwe 1.617,000 47])60 U387601 II66.000I 460000 1 400000 2.071,000 1 3,e71000 10 21 USER FEE DATA 21 22 SlitSoFmlly Rooderree War Fee 181.97 1102.23 1127.51 1163.e0 4178.07 $184.49 32 23 Num6o of Eprlvelent Dwelling UNIe 73.180 73,250 74,090 74,300 74,590 )).090 22 24 Estimated Low Fees IO,OSS.000 17,550.000 10.I47,00D 111.353,00O 113,383,000 $14.222,334 24 25% Tax Diversion C......-"fl2--" --1 Fee Adj. 1992-93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.2 ReNaad 8/1392 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pe9e 1 FISCAL YEARS 1992 1993 THROUGH 2001 2002 5 Year Total 5 Year Total LINE 199293 1993-90 199495 199690 1996-92 1.92-1993 19972002 1O-Yaef Toth LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 2 Fee—.a CermOwr From Lest Year 29,943,000 27.08,000 28,060.000 211.920,000 31,611.Oo0 26,803.000 35,091,000 28,843,000 2 3 REVENUE 3 1 She,..11%Tax Allocation 6.828,000 7.101,000 2.385.000 2,680,000 7.987.000 36,981.000 44,988,000 81.989,o00 1 5 Feee:Industrial West. 2,250,000 2,588,000 2,976,000 3,122,00D 3,935,000 I5,17I,000 30,512,000 45,893,000 5 6 User Fee. 18.103.000 20.821.000 25,032.000 29.286.000 33.682.000 129,952.000 180.878.000 307.835,000 6 Interest&Mi...lemous Income 1.907.000 1.90,000 1,995,000 2,117.000 2.319,000 10,315,000 16,3113,000 25,898.000 3 8 Tr ensler from COP FuMh, 522.00D 613.000 312,000 801.000 633.000 3.485,000 1.135,000 7,660,000 9 8 Other Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 9 10 TOTAL REVENUE 29.610.000 33,123,000 38,10o,o00 13,306,000 19J30,OOo 192..... W 275,938.000 468.865.000 10 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 50A63.000 60.802.000 68,160,Oo0 32,228.00C) 90,381,000 2191153.000 311,122.000 195.688.000 11 12 EXPENDITURES 12 13 Share of Jr.We*.M A 0 15,789,000 16,55Sofx, 18,211.00D 20,035,000 22,039,000 92,635,000 118,005,000 240A10.000 13 11 Collection Svatem M 6 O and Other Opal. 2,099,000 2,201,000 2,311,000 2,130,000 2,552,000 11,599,o00 11,e10,000 26,a09.000 11 15 COP Same. 1108a.000 13.780.000 16J12,000 18160o00 20299.000 80.027.000 101.222,000 191,242,000 15 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 28,834,000 32,513 OCO 33,2b,WD b,615,0o0 10,890,000 184,281,000 264.032,000 448.298.000 I6 17 A...Mr.A CerrYOwr to Near Year 27.479,000 28,060,000 28,920,000 31.6111000 35A91,000 35,491,000 17A90,000 0,390,000 17 IB Next Years Dry Petlal Fundins Repulrements 11A97.000 16.231.000 18.620.000 20,308.000 22A45.000 22.445.000 29,499,000 2%4.9.000 IB 19. 20%ConOnOemV Raeerve 517951. 6,608,000 ),148,000 8,123.000 9.979,0W 819381000 11.800.000 11,800000 19 20 Porous of Insurance ResoM, 3.193.000 5.281.000 2.852.000 3,180.000 1.068.000 1,068,000 810911000 6.091.000 20 31 USER FEE DATA 21 22 Sln&Fncil,Residence Wer Fee 168.63 $78.96 994.28 0109.59 $124.89 1131.54 22 23 Number f Eauivaent Owe1lln9 Units 263,783 281,358 265,508 207,233 269,533 291.033 23 24 Estimated U.er Fee. 119,1031W0 920,831,000 125,032.000 129,286,000 /33,662,000 136,963,081 24 25% Tax Diversion �1201.111 If, on 3.>s -w 1 Fee Adj• 1992-93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.3 Name!Sl13A2 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Parts 1 FISCAL YEARS 1992 1993 THROUGH 2O01 2002 S-Y.er Total 5 Year Tula LINE 192293 1993-94 189L95 199598 1996.97 199219.7 19972GG2 IO Year Tmal LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 2 Reserves B Cerry Over From Last Year 34537.000 38626.000 39JI1.000 39,I4S.00O 39,849.000 34,537,000 36,382,000 34.537.000 2 3 REVENUE 3 4 Share of 1%Tax Allocation 6.749,000 9,099,000 9,493,000 9,942A00 10,238,000 47.389.000 57.659.000 105,048,000 5 F...:IMuslesl Wen. 1.900.000 2,185.000 1.613,000 1.890.000 3.316000 12.812,000 25,772,000 39.584.000 IS 6 User Fas. 18.)63.000 21,307,000 24.297,00D 27,334,000 30,a0o.0o0 123.101.000 198.930,000 332,031,000 5 T Imer...& lake.Ileweu.Ina— 2,619.000 2.758.000 21861,000 2.989.000 2.46e,000 IA,Ol.,. 16,684,000 29.934.000 T B Transfer from COP Fossils E06.000 687,000 e00,000 915,000 978,000 3.886.000 4,89 ,OOO 8,778,000 8 e Other Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 10 TOTAL REVENUE 33,631,000 36.046.000 31.934.000 43.079.00) 47.802.000 201.198.000 302.815.000 W4.113,003 ID 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 611 0]e.000 72.67I.000 78.851.000 83,124.000 87.851.000 235.335.000 341.297.000 53e.650.000 11 12 EXPENDITURES 11 13 share of Joint WorseM 6 0 16.898.030 13.I77.000 19,225.000 21,148,000 23.263.0OrJ 97J81.W 168,I24.000 2.4 0oi 13 14 ...ad..Sveum he and Other Offer. a,e35,000 3,9100.000 3,045.000 31197.000 3A53.000 10,934.000 19.476.000 36.410.000 16 15 COP Servies I0.345.000 13.577,. 17,136,000 18193... 22,6a9,000 83,638,000 112.950,O70 19 IRMOTO IS 16 TOTAL EXPENDU ORES 31.44%000 33,954.000 39,408 000 43 236000 /9,269.000 197,353.000 289.650.070 486.003,030 IS 17 Reserves 6 Car,Over to Near Year 35.525.W0 38.317,000 39,245,000 39,649,000 38,382,000 38,382,000 52,646,930 52.946.230 IT 18 Nen Y....Dry Perloa Fondle,Rtalloonso. 15.725,000 18.973.000 19.703.000 31.838,000 24,635.000 24,635,000 31.I30.000 32.170.000 18 19 20%Conun,rn.,R..enor 8.290.000 0.391.000 7.891 000 8,655,000 9,854.000 9.854,000 12.888,000 12,969,000 19 20 Pos on of Insurance Reesrva 14.810,000 14,949.000 ll,aml.000 9,556.000 3.893.000 3.893.000 3.608.930 7.608.930 20 21 USER FEE DATA 21 22 61n,le Fermis Retltlen[a User Fee Q0d8 $35.79 $85.19 496.59 $107.01 1169.33 22 23 NumBar of Equivalent Dwelling Unit. 211O.S. 281,165 281,895 282,990 284,085 289.580 13 24 E.umetel Us.,Fee. 119.783.01 121,307,000 124,297,000 e23,334,000 130,400.000 146,135,595 14 ( l 25% Tax Diversion en-••^ '•- ^?)'•^'-Far Fee Adj. 1992-93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.5 R.A.W all3rS2 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW PepFI FISCAL YEARS 1092 1993 THROUGH 2001-2002 6 Year Total SYear Told LINE 199293 I993.91 r994B6 1995.90 199597 19921997 191)3002 10 Year Tolal LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 2 Rnarve•6 CnMOver From Lan Year 11,781,000 10 090000 11 111)000 11 590 000 I1 888 fiC0 8,784,03D 11 936,l B 794 000 2 3 REVENUE ] 1 SM1ne of l%Tv All Onto. 2.112.00) 2.196.000 2.281.000 2.376.000 ]A)0.000 11,437,000 13,916.000 25,353,WO 1 5 F•ae:IMunri•I Wall W.000 SB,aW 67,OJO )),000 BBpoO 34I,000 657.000 1.028.000 5 0 Lear F... 21691,OOo 2,861.000 2.038.000 3,217,000 3,398,000 15,212,000 19,796,000 35.008,000 5 Imam 6 Mieeellaneou•Inaome Bakal 317.000 603.000 831.000 8101000 3,879,000 1,218,000 9.OB7,000 3 B Tr—for from COP FuM• 311.000 121.000 161,000 116,000 131,000 600.000 630,000 1,199,000 B 8 OrAar Ravanua o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 10 TOTALREVENUE 6028000 6BBe 00O 0317000 6016000 OB2500p 31738000 38217000 70 985 000 10 I TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 14813000 I6078000 I7161000 1/1335000 I81114500 /0522000 51183500 79759 DID 11 12 EXPENDITURES 12 13 Share of Jone Works M L O 1,785.000 1.1172,000 2.059.000 2,285,000 2,192.000 10,03.000 16.330.000 27.209.000 13 11 CWlemlon S,om M 60 eM Orbr Oil 769,000 )e),000 e3". 178,000 923,000 1,195.000 6.362.000 9,50,000 11 15 COP S•rNoe 1978000 3283000 3878000 ]]05500 ]16]000 1]91)500 17316000 31233500 IB 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4523000 4902000 6))1000 0418500 5878000 28585500 39b]000 E7 BBB SOO 10 17 R•eam•6 Call Over 10 Neal Year 10,090,000 111117.000 11,690,000 11,BB0,SW 11.230,500 11,9351S00 11.760.500 11,7110,500 17 iB N•n Yeai•or,PeaoO Flats,RaMlramani• 2,281,000 2,481,000 2.887,000 3,225,o 3,139,00I 3,438,000 1.327.000 1.127.000 IB IB 20%Conllnp•n.,R.•ery 901000 883000 1165OW 1290000 1370000 1 ])5.000 1)]1000 1 731 000 19 20 Poison el I... eIl 6925,000 7614000 7618010 7,371500 71216W 71215W 6)33.500 5722 NO 20 21 USER FEE DATA 21 22 SIV.FmtlY Fred—Um Fee 1101.53 II0762 1113.46 Ill"A. II25A6 6156.04 22 23 NumOn of EWlvlem Cereal,UMb 28.533 26,633 26,783 20,1 27,093 27,833 23 24 Evrlmeua Lear Fee• 12.591,000 12,851,030 13,039,000 1],21),000 83.398.W0 N,343,081 24 1 1 25% Tax Diversion e--'" - - "r Fee Adj. 1992-93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.6 RMeM 8114M2 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pepe 1 FISCAL YEARS 1992 1988 THROUGH=1 =2 BY...Tons 5 Year Total LINE 19,218 1993-94 189495 199590 199587 19921997 19972002 IG Yee,TOtel LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 2 ll Ar Crtry Over Ron,i veer 6)I1 000 7,620,000 B4O66 000 7,911,00D 6 R6 000 6.141,000 5,662,000 6,)11 000 2 S REVENUE 2 • SNu of 1%Tn A1I0cetan 1,100,000 I'lee 00 1.180.000 1.228.000 1,268,000 6,B6Q000 7,260,000 13R20.000 4 5 Feee:IMuetrlM Wnb 175,000 201,000 23I,000 2651" 306,000 1,179,000 2,])6,000 2.556000 5 6 Uw Foe 3,151.000 3.204.000 2.621.000 2.068,000 4,099.000 10.114.000 32A25,000 6O,52B.000 0 Intoen A Btiecel—oue Incmme 613I.000 5781000 688,000 50,000 e60,000 2,705,000 116181000 4.329.00D ) e Tornio I,.COP FuMe 22.000 09,000 82.000 11/.000 151.000 422.000 570,000 902,000 8 9 OIM,Revenue 0 O O O 0 0 O 0 B 10 TOTAL REVENUE 1088000 6])1000 6)2]000 6,02e000 6])e,004 28,390,000 44,2e8,000 72626WD 10 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 11720000 1219,11. 1]j0),000 13,211". 12,2600W 26121000 I101000t 78269,000 11 12 EXPENDITURES 12 13 SNu of Joint Wake M 60 2,5)],000 2,689,000 2.869,000 3,286.000 ],58].000 15,100,000 24,127,000 29.227.000 12 Ie "Iecrlon Eve—M 60 eM Often OFer. 301,000 3IS,000 322.000 349,000 368,000 1.464.0"0 2,120,000 8.78e.000 le 15 COP S.Moe 1216000 I lei Io00 2596000 3324000 9J29.000 12796000 I36e6,000 3IAe0,000 15 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4110000 e9260(0 6896000 8938000 7,89, 0 29559,000 e4e92 O00 71e51000 16 17 Reeervn 6 CBrr,Over to Neo Yee, ),6]0,000 8.065.000 7,081,000 0,976.000 61502.000 5,662,000 e,91a,db0 4.218,000 17 18 Hev,Yoie D,Perlo6 FuMIn9 ReMLememe 2,056.000 2A83.000 2.9e0.000 3,e70,0011 3,944,000 3,1144,000 e,991,000 4,991,000 1a 19. 20%Contingent,R.— 021,OOD 905.2W 1178200 1007800 15276O0 I637600 1990200 I,896200 1B ]O Portion of Ineureno.Be... ♦)e].OW 4.616,800 2)6]800 2118,200 180,b0 1BO,b0 IS OBB,3001 1],069,3001 30 21 USER FEE DATA 21 22 Single Femiv,ReeMence U—Fee I72.67 178.91 I84.23 689.68 $94.91 1181.BB 22 23 Nuu6er of EWlviii-I DetaM1ing Units e2.820 412.1180 42,990 e3,090 e2,150 43,690 23 24 Erini User Ff.. 13,161.0,00 I2A84.000 I3,821,000 03,059,000 14.0911,000 47,940,]2) 24 25% Tax Diversion c - ] - `- A)--' -"I Fee Adj. 1992-93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.) ReHaed 8113M2 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH ROW Pe0a1 FISCAL YEARS 1992 1993 THROUGH 2001 2002 5 Year Total 5 Year Toll LINE 1B9LBd 1923.9e 129495 199695 199597 19921997 19972001 10 Year Total LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 2 Rmrwe 6 Carry Over From boat Year 1])119000 1])83000 21229000 23856000 25,811,000 I])9B000 27,6211,000 13,7991000 2 3 REVENUE 3 1 Share of I%Tax Allocation 3,323,000 3,e56.000 3.601,000 3,7311.0410 3.868.000 17.999.000 21,804,000 39,903.000 A 6 Fees:IMwltll Wnla M,000 966,000 1.IIIAOO 1,2711,000 1.170.000 5,685,o00 111b51000 1),0]0.080 5 5 Uaa Faae 6,0761000 5,129,000 5.100.000 6,202.000 5A43,000 25,999,000 28.010.000 5e,008,000 5 Interest6 MiacNbneoua Income 1,114.000 1.378.000 1.592.000 1.7SS,Ooo I,BBB,000 7]27,000 11,561,000 19.279.000 ) 8 Trxnelar from COP Furls 147.000 I14,000 159,000 191.000 199.000 S20.000 970,000 1j90,0041 a 9 Other Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 10 TOTAL REVENUE 10600000 11052.000 I18e6000 12.314000 12J9B.000 W210.000 73.041.00D 132.051.000 IO 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 262110000 28836000 321374000 36080,000 38,629,000 72,009,000 IOIA89,000 145650000 11 12 EXPENDITURES 11 13 Share of Jtlm Weha M 60 1J98.000 2.933,000 3,215.000 3.S49.000 3.901000 16,410." 26,216.000 12,524.000 13 H Collection Spum M 6 Orel Other Opw. 1.598.000 1.867,000 1.710.000 1.838,000 1,930,000 6,773,000 11,19e.000 I9.871.000 1/ I6 COP SeMcx 100000 3,007000 8,042,000 4853000 6167000 19.196.000 26,835,000 45,033,000 IS I6 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 6516000 )50]000 9.018000 10238000 IIOOIOoo 44,381,0G0 6]21]000 107818000 16 17 Re—ea 6 Carry Over to Next Yur 1).)03,000 21,228,000 23,816,000 25,861,000 17A28.000 27.028.000 38,222,000 38,222,000 17 18 Next Yeara Dry Pedoa FuMlrq ReWlancenls 3,268,000 3.801.000 4.509.000 5.120.000 5.501.000 6,501.000 6,BfiB4Oo0 6.859,000 18 IB 20%Con11n9errcY Free— 1,]0]000 1,521.000 I80e000 2048,000 2,200,000 2,300.000 2.783,000 2,793,000 19 20 Person of Insurance Reserve 13,223000 15.803.000 I7543OOD I9673000 19827.000 19.227" 28.490.000 19 490000 20 21 USER FEE DATA 21 22 Single Family Residence War Fee 151.15 161.68 $51.99 152.40 152.78 $54.95 12 23 N...,of Equivalent Dwelling Units 99.220 99,428 99.820 100.e28 101.228 IO6,118 23 24 Estlmeted War Fees 16,076,o00 15,126,000 15,180,000 15,262,000 15.343.000 $5,782,279 24 t .,A.o.Ntrw1332ti r..t 25% Tax Diversion Fee Adj. 1992-93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.II R—ed 8113192 STATEMENT OF PROJECTEO CASH ROW Pe, I NSCAL YEARS 1992-1093 THROUGH 2O01-2002 BY...Tool 5-Yex Total LINE 1802.93 1993-94 lesLss 1995-96 199697 199297 19972002 10.Yeer Tolel LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 2 Roseve.A C,Owt Fran Bet Yost 12.210 000 13.215.000 13.M 500 13.293.500 11.627.000 12.210,000 11.860.000 11.210.000 2 3 REVENUE 3 Stine at I%Tax M.".. 1,989.000 2.Oe8,000 1.152.000 2.238.000 2.320,000 10,71"e,Ooo 13,115,000 23,891.000 A 6 Fees:lMuetdol West. 280,000 322.000 370.000 42e.000 100.000 1.118i,000 3.801.01 5.691.000 5 6 Ueer Few 3.7I8,000 4.011,000 6.31e,000 4,9110,000 5,4aB.00o 13,W5,000 AD,057.000 82,463,000 6 Inlere..A Mecell—oue Income 901,OW 946,OD0 9e7.000 813.00D 861.000 /.569.000 1,570.000 8.139.000 ] 6 Trentler Iran COP Foods WOOD 126.000 155.000 174,000 131.000 702,000 900,a00 1.6"1.000 8 8 Otbr Its— O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 10 TOTAL REVENUE e9510oG )1)1000 1912000 •611000 11329000 10310.400 02//8000 1037e6.000 10 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 1818/.000 20,)19000 21523530 21834500 21958000 51.5B0.000 ]{.305000 116026000 11 12 EXPENDITURES 12 13 S6era Ol Jdnt Wohe M A O 3,808.000 2.9e3,000 3,237,000 3,561,000 3,917.000 16,667,000 26.307,000 42.]]4,000 13 H Comealon S"..M A D eN OIM,Gpec 11e5.000 8G9.000 953.DOo 1.Go1.000 1.051.000 4.)]9,000 a,100.000 10.978.000 11 IS COP S.M.. 2.275,000 3287500 1.03901M, 4,11550D 6128.000 19.1)6000 25.610000 15116 Is 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 5949.00) 7.138.600 6229000 9307500 10096000 10750000 511017000 911)6) 16 17 Reeervee 6 Caq^Over to Next Yeet 13.215,000 13.580.600 13.293.500 12.827.000 11.860.000 11.860,000 16.259.000 16.259,000 17 18 Next Yonto Dry Period Whip Rep Arermme 2.975.000 3.568.000 /.115.000 4.651,000 6,01;000 5.018,000 6,390.000 e,390.000 16 18 fo%COnfing,Fees. 1.190.000 1A28,000 1.61e000 1,852.000 2.01 2]19 2. 19 Pon ofrcRew 0 20 9 1,093. 0 7,313000 )313000 20 21 USER FEE DATA 21 22 Sin01e FeMIV R....me Ueer Fee 173.03 378.19 383.91 $94.38 $104.84 I1)).15 33 23 NumMr of Epdvelent OweNnO UNb 60.810 51,110 51.100 51.810 62,160 63.910 23 24 FetlmelM Ueer Bee 13,7I8.000 04,011,000 11.018.001) 11.890.00D 16.169.000 18,660.330 24 )/11I8] CF 83B.%L6 B:fi5 PM 100% Tax Diversion - - Fee Adj. 1992-93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.1 THRU 14 7I14M2 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW P.,I FISCAL YEARS 19021993 THROUGH 5001-2002 S.Yee.Total 5 Year Tarot LINE 1992.93 1993-41 199495 1996.96 1996.97 10921997 1097-5002 10-Year Tatel LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 2 R..-6CerrYOwr F,—lrt Yeer 113.880, 0 112,748,000 18D,470,560 184,980.7w 139,8114.500 118,680,000 141,784,500 11916801000 2 3 REVENUE i 4 Share of 116 Tex Allocation 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 rose;IrNutldal Wnb 6,885,00D 8,780,00D )J0).000 8,067,000 10.013.000 39.752.000 78,890o00 110.731.000 5 6 Unr EYe. 66,493,000 64,285,000 106M87.000 116,e82,000 120.625,000 631,e62.000 758.671,000 1,291,333.000 6 Irral 9 Mlecaeen..u.Imam. e1418,000 9.0501000 9.4177,000 9.awoca, 10,102,000 46,8)),000 59,991,000 106,174,000 T 8 Tr...he lwm COP Fund. I,e68.000 1.011.000 1,300.a00 2,679,000 2,797,000 11,735,000 13.885,000 15,650,000 8 1 One,Revenue 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 9 10 TOTAL REVENUE 101 094,W 115,11e,000 126,041,00D 116,326,000 IBl,e1),ODO 830,026,000 912.633.000 1.642.669.000 le 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 110.281,000 161.874.000 165.511.SW 1)3.024]60 581.021,500 745,015,000 1.056.317.M 1.656.149.000 11 12 EXPENDITURES IS 13 Sher.of Joint Work.M 6 0 40.649.000 51.011.000 56.112.M 61.714.000 67,89e,000 586,383.000 458,076,000 141.369.000 13 14 Celleatlan S,tP.M 6 O Real OON,Other. 11.316,000 1e,151.000 10,652.000 11.150.000 I1]03.000 54,511,000 67,822,000 125.734.000 14 15 COP SIM.. 33,671,000 43.271,)611 53p90.500 60.505.150 08.336.Do0 558.516.500 341,112,070 600.839,570 15 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 13,638.000 1".403.760 120,614,600 183,44e,250 14),88),a00 590,831.6e0 864.910.070 1.464.741.670 16 11 Revrvn 1 Carry OWlle Nnt Year 121,745.000 130.470.550 134.995.760 130,8e4.000 143,)84,100 143d84.500 191,407,43e 181,402.430 17 19 Next Year's Dry Pn106 FuMlrq Reaulremmu 46,903,000 61,208,000 69,288,000 65,e78,a00 72,842,000 72,641.000 11,590,000 84,680,000 18 19 20%Cantle e,R...M; 18.708.000 20,660,000 24A03.800 29,989,300 38.69),e00 29,68),900 38.497.400 38.497.400 IB 30 Unepprep Or Portion 0f ln.ur.nc.Reserve 58,137,000 58.191,250 51.600,950 4),519.300 41.341J00 41,364J00 68.330.030 58.]30.030 SO 21 Uur FEE lnlotmoll, 21 22 Slnpb Farrel,Road—.We.Fee E100.91 6109.17 $121.69 $134.39 0147.07 $183,49 S2 23 Number of ERulVal.nt Dwalllrrp UNI. 844.704 846,374 849.594 054,114 869,609 ee9se4 13 24 E.Om.ted War Fee.,Exclude.MWO 04.8113.000 92.486,000 103.3e7.000 111,702,000 126,415.000 103,232,P9 24 100% Tax Diversion "Le-2"•"?""""-'••' Fee Adj. 1992-93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.1 Revised 7114513 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW P.,1 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 1992-1997 1997d002 LINE 1992-93 1993-94 199445 1995�96 199897 SY.w T." 5Xen Total I0.YwV Toll LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 2 A.... e 8 C.w,Ovel From Lul Yell 9.135.000 9,375,000 81039J50 8,266,250 9,161.000 9,1351000 10.909.000 9,135.000 2 3 REVENUE 3 4 Sbere oft%Yet Allocation O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 Feee:IMUetrlel Weele 400.000 460.000 528.000 ases'a 0 699,000 2,696,000 5,425,000 9,121,0D0 5 6 Us.,F... 7,601,000 9,167.000 11.119.000 13.091.000 16.090.000 56.068.000 80,028,000 136,096,00D a T 1.0-16 Mi...11......lncwne 611,000 572.000 502,000 a06,000 761,000 3,D9,000 6,096.000 8.153.000 T 8 Tremlw flown COP Funds 281.000 274.000 306.000 338.000 350,000 1.551.000 1.760.000 3.301.000 6 9 Other Rewnue O 0 O O 0 0 O 0 8 10 TOTAL REVENUE 8.883.000 10.473 000 11.623,000 14,643,000 ifl.m.000 63,372.000 92.199.000 155.671AW 10 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 18.028.000 18.848 ODO 10.562]50 22.911.250 28p01,000 72,507,000 103,227.000 164.806.000 11 12 EXPENDITURES - 12 13 She.of Joint We*.M 6 0 4,675.000 4,902,000 5.392.000 5.931.000 8.624,000 27,424.000 43,910.000 71.234,000 13 14 Ca6ecUon System M 6 0 and Diner Open. 850.000 BB3,000 717,000 753,000 791.000 3,594,000 4,595,000 9J.9.001, 14 15 COP Service 4.328.000 5.223,250 6,185.500 7.066.250 3.708.00D 30.51 IXOD 36 540.000 69.051,000 16 I6 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 9.553,000 10,808,250 12,294,500 13,750.250 15.023.000 61.529,000 96 845 000 148.474,000 16 IT Reswwe a C..,Ovw to Seen Yeen 8.376,000 8,039,750 8,368,250 9,161.000 10.978,000 10,978,000 16,332,00O 16,332,000 17 18 Wool Test'.D,Period FundLp Recubemenle 4.827,000 5,404.W0 6,147.000 8.875.000 7.612.000 7.512.000 9,813,000 9,613,000 1B 19 20%Contingency Rwewe 1.931,000 1.162.000 2.459,000 2.750.000 8,005.000 3.005.000 3.945.000 3,845.000 19 20 Portion of insurance Reserves 1,617,000 473,750 1337.7501 1464.0001 461.000 1 461,000 2,874,OOD 1 2,874,000 10 21 21 22 Sing.Fwrc1y Residence User Fee $102.88 $123.90 1150.07 6178.19 1202.31 $213.01 22 23 Numben of Equivalent Dwelling Units 73,880 73.950 74,090 74.300 74.590 77,090 13 24 E.Umeted Unn Feee 117.601.000 69,167.000 911.lig. 0 113.091,000 615.090.Po0 $16.421.712 24 100% Tax Diversion Cn_ua. I.v nl_ :1.eve -I Fee Adj. 1992-93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.2 RevUJ]n.re2 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pass FISCAL YEARS 1122 1913 THROUGH 20O1 2002 S Year Toltl 5.vs.,rural LINE 199213 499394 19949E 199598 1998d97 19921907 19272002 10-Year To1O LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 2 Reserves B Carry Over From Lost Year 28,943000 27481000 28.0111000 211920000 31809000 28843.000 35♦86,000 16,843,000 2 3 REVENUE 3 ♦ SIR...at I%To.Almoatlon 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 6 F...:Industrial Wes.. 2,250,000 2.51111,0010 2.178.000 3,422,000 3.935.000 I5,17I.00to 30.512,000 45,61113,000 5 e Uear F... 24.933.00o 2).974,000 32,416,000 30,901000 41,114e,000 1631133,000 225.862.000 3119J95.0DO 6 Inurs.I L Macallanaou.I.e.. 1.9071" 1,947,000 1,985,000 2,117,000 2.349.000 10.315,000 15,378,000 25,694,000 ) 9 Transfer from COP Funds SEEM 513.000 712,000 BOI,000 037,000 3,485,000 4,1?6,OW ).eWPW 8 1 Other Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 B 10 TOTAL REVENUE 28513000 33123000 381089000 43304,WO e8)8]GW 18390♦,000 2]6,92BOW ♦68,832,OW 10 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 55♦Sfi00 WW 0 . 3.000 ee,1W W0 73.224000 80,3)8,000 211,70000 31141400D 495.07S,OW 11 11 EXPENDITURES 12 13 Shars of Joint Works M B O 15,7119.000 10.558.0W 111.214.000 20.036,000 22,We,000 12.635,000 118.W5,OW 240.1140.000 13 14 CdLcllon System M e O..OUR.,Deal. 2,009,000 2,204,000 2,314,000 2,430,000 2.552.000 I1,598,000 14,810,000 28,409,000 14 16 COP Service IIABBWO 13.780.000 10712.000 18.I50.000 20,299.WO 90,027,000 101.222.00D 181.24901140 IS 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 28,874.003 32,542.000 37,240,000 b,816 000 44.890.000 I84.281 000 26♦03),aW 449,208,0W 1s 17 Reserves 6 Carry Over Next Year 17,4e1.000 28,0111,000 28,920WO 31.609,000 35.485.000 35.486.0W 47,377,000 47,3)],000 17 IB Next Year.Dry Period Funding Rapufamenls 14,487,000 16.271,000 111.620.000 20A08,000 22,4I5.000 12,045.0011 29.499.000 29f98,000 18 t8 20%Contln9enq R..ais. 5.785.000 0,608,000 7,448,000 8,123M 8,97B,WO 8.978,000 11.BW,OW 1"SWIM 19 20 Pardon.1 ormurence R....we ) 199,000 5.2112,000 2.852,000 3.1711.000 4,063.WO 0.063.000 6,078,000 8,078,OW 20 21 U...Fee Data 21 22 S.n91.Family R.Nwd—Us.,Fee 494.52 $106.02 4122.09 4138.32 4154.51 I1s0.11 22 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units 283,783 264,358 265.508 267.233 269.533 281.033 23 24 Efirrou d We.Fee. 124,833.OW 12].9]4,000 132,/I0,000 126.904.000 141.045.000 145,582.392 24 100% Tax Diversion •-' "'-""•Mae.. Fee Adj. 1992-93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.3 Ri Vaed 7114*2 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH ROW Ppe 1 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01 2002 5 Year real BY...Toma LINE 1992-93 199394 1994-95 199686 1995-97 1992-1997 199)-2002 10YBer Tend LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 2 Reeeme 6 Carry Over From pp Year 34,537,000 36,625,000 38.7I8000 38.247 000 39.851,000 34.537.000 38.384,000 34.537,000 2 3 REVENUE 3 4 Sn.r.of l%Tea Allocation 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 0 4 5 Feet:IMuattlY Waeu "Inno.000 2.185,000 2.613.000 2.BW.A 3.324.000 12.812.000 15.)]3.000 38,684.000 5 6 U.er Fee. 18.512,000 30.408.000 33,760.000 3).176.010D 40.633,000 170,489,000 256,591,000 427,0110.01 6 ko.m.6 AS...Ran...lnaome 2,618,OOa 2,768. 0 2.861.000 2,896.000 1.864.000 14,010.000 15.064.000 28,674.W0 ] 8 Traveler Nom COP FUM. We.. 687,000 800,0o0 815.000 978.000 3AWIC 0I 4,890.000 8,)]60OD 8 8 Other N.V... 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 8 10 TOTAL REVENUE 33.537.01 36048,00D 39 834.000 43 8)9,000 4)-)89 000 201,197,000 302.917.000 504 114.000 10 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 68.074000 73 8)1 000 711,853,0111) 83 126.000 87 650.000 235.734.000 341,298.000 S311 651000 11 12 EXPENDITURES 12 13 Sham of Joan Wort.M 6 O 16.088. 0 17.4)].01 19,225,000 21,148,000 23,363,000 8).]81.000 156,224,000 254,005,000 13 14 Collection Sytem M 6 0 and OIMr Oper. 4,436,000 2,900.000 3.045,000 3,197.000 3.357.000 18,934,000 18.470.000 38,410.000 14 IS OoP9emice 10348.000 13577000 0,136000 12830,000 22.848000 82638000 113990,070 185.598,070 15 18 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 31.44L000 33.954.000 39.406.000 43,276.000 48.269.000 187,353,000 188.850.070 488.003.070 16 17 R..ervn 6 C.,v Oear lc Plant Year 36,625,000 33,719,000 39.20.000 39.851.000 39,381,000 38,381,000 52.647.930 52,80.930 17 18 Nan Veer'.D,Pano6 FUMnO ReWirenwnp 15.725.000 16.8)).000 18,703,000 21.838,000 24,835,000 24,635,000 32.170,000 32,170,000 18 18 20%Contingency Re emn 6.290.000 6)9\a00 )881 aW 8,655.000 9.854.000 9.854,000 12.868 000 12 861000 18 20 lentma.t Insurance R6urn 14.610.000 14.851000 11,683.000 *.Sao. 0 3,882.000 ],883.000 ),6pB,930 ),609.930 10 21 User Fee Data 21 22 SIn,l.FaolV Rol U...Fee $101,54 "OBAS 4119Ja $131d7 114303 8202.34 22 23 Number of EWI,Want OwellLp Unita 280.900 2.11165 281,a95 282.990 284.085 2B9,5n. 23 24 Eatlmaled U.er F... 128.512. 130.4G8.W0 133.760.000 137.118.000 $ 0.633.000 158.5.9.57. 24 ( l 100% Tax Diversion Fee Adj. 1992-93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.5 R.N°.G 7114192 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pagel FISCAL YEARS 1992 1993 THROUGH 2O01 2002 5 Yet,Torsi 5 Year Total LINE 199293 199394 1994-15 199598 109897 1992-real 199T2002 IO Year Teal LINE I OPERATING FUND 1 2 Renrvn 6 CarrYOvar FWo Lost Year 11784000 10.080,000 11117000 I1A900W I1,888500 8,794.000 11,93gSx, 8,784000 2 3 REVENUE 3 4 Share of 1%Tea Allocation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 F...:IMaaltlY Wnt° 50.000 SB,o00 67,W0 77.000 89.000 341,000 897,000 1.028.000 5 a Wer Fee° 41800.000 610001000 5,323,000 6,692.00" S18081000 30,849.000 33.713.000 60362.W 6 ] Ina....I&Macallameua 1.... 658.030 747,030 903.Oo0 B31.000 Bb,000 3.879.000 4.218.000 B4OB].000 ) a T...far tram COP For 314.000 124,000 154,000 148,000 131,000 alto 0 630.000 1,499,000 B 9 other Ravanua 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 10 TOTAL REVENUE 5,9211000 6,989,000 6,34]GM 8A46.GW 6,9280o0 31J38,000 39,246.000 ]0985.000 10 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 14,813 O00 I6,0)B.WO 17,484,000 19 338 WD 19,814,SC0 40,S22,000 51,164 600 71.770.000 11 12 EXPENDITURES 12 13 SAau of Joint Work°M 6 O 1.785,000 1.672.000 2,069,000 2,265,000 2.492,000 10,473.000 15,736,000 27.209.000 13 14 Coleation System M 6 O aM 01Mr Door. )68oW )9],000 837,000 879.000 923.000 4,195,000 5,352.000 11.647,000 14 I6 COP Samoa 1,97900", 2.392000 ]8]6.000 3.305,500 3,463,000 13,917500 17,316000 31233500 16 IS TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4,522,000 4.962.000 5.]]4 000 8.449 500 6.078.000 28.5115.500 38.40]000 87 9B8,500 16 17 R--&Can,OY.r to Net Year 10,090,oC0 11,117,000 11A90JODO 11.086.500 11.936.500 11,936,500 11J81,500 11.791,600 17 I9 Next Year'.OrY Pence Funding Requirement. 2,251,000 2.481.000 2,867.000 3.225.000 3,439,000 3,439,000 4.327.000 4.327,000 IB 19 20%Confl000ncy Ross— 904,000 982,000 1,156o00 1,290000 1.379.000 Ip10,000 1J]L000 1.)3100 I9 20 Force.of ln°urenc°Raurva 6826000 7.644000 ].648000 ].3]1.500 7.121.500 7,121.500 6J22M S71 B20 20 21 USER FEE DATA 22 fimps ForelY Rsed.nea U.ar Fee 6181.12 4169.98 $199.73 1207.63 6216.66 $254.04 22 23 NUmb.,of EWirYent Dwelling LIMA 25.633 26A33 26,783 26,933 27,083 27.833 23 24 E°timNep U°er Fae. 14.800.000 66,0501000 65.323,000 15,592,000 15.868,000 17.349,026 24 100% Tax Diversion Fee Adj. 1992-93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.6 Revised 7111/92 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Ppe 1 FISCAL YEARS 1092 1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 5 Year Tole 5 Year T.I.1 LINE 1992.23 199394 199495 199590 199697 19921997 1997,2002 1O-Yww Total LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 2 Reserves Carry Over From Lest Year 0741,. 7820000 8.0e5.ODO 7.891000 0.8)B4O00 5J41000 5,SS2,. 6,70.000 2 3 REVENUE 3 a Share of l%Tex Allocation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 6 Bee:IMut,11 Weeu VB,OW 201,OK0 231,000 250.000 30e1000 1,179,000 2,375,000 3,654,000 5 a U...Faea e.251.000 4,528,000 4,311,000 5,097,000 s.397,000 24.024.01 39.690.000 83.)64.000 a Interut 6 Mbcallare oue Income 531,000 579,000 fi09.000 547.000 460.000 2]05.0W 1,821,000 4,32e.000 ) 9 Temple,from COP Fulda 32.000 63,000 92.000 114.000 121.000 422,04c0 S70,000 912.000 9 9 Other Reverwe 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 1 10 TOTAL REVENUE 6888000 5,371000 6723000 6.026000 2 221,000 28380,000 40.261I000 72,636.000 10 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 11 1730,000 12,891 000 13,787,000 13.816 ODO I3.250.00D 36121,000 A1.11a 000 )9,37).00O 11 12 EXPENDITURES 12 13 SFere at Joint Wnrte M 6 O ].5)3.000 21591.000 2,968,000 3,266.000 3.593.000 is.100.000 24,122.000 39.222.000 13 1/ Console.Sprem M 6 0 aM Other OF.,. 301,000 316,000 332.000 341.003 3a5.000 1.864,001 2,120,000 3.794,. 11 16 COP S.M.. 1.235.000 1.9110" 2,595,000 3,324,000 3.729,000 12.795.004) 18.605.000 31,440,00D 15 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES a.110,000 4,928,000 5,895.000 5.939.000 7,881,000 281658,000 69 992,000 )4A51,000 to 17 Reserves 6 Carry-Over to Next Year 7.820,000 9,O96.o00 71691JOW 01976,000 6.5021" %S62,000 4,928.000 4,826,000 17 IB Near Ynie Dry Period Funding Re6union.ma 2.055.000 2.453.000 2,948.000 3,420,000 3.844.000 3.844JOW 4,191.000 1.891,000 19 IB 20%Contingency terms 822.000 985,200 1.139 200 1.387 e00 1,537.600 1.537.500 1 98B.200 1,986,20D 11 20 Portion of Insurance Reserve 4,743,000 a,616 800 3J113.800 2,118,200 190,400 1 I00,400 12,061 2001 @,OSf,2DO1 20 21 USER FEE DATA 21 22 61ngs Formal,Residents Unr Fee $99.25 1106.69 1111.91 4118.29 1124.73 1211.73 22 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Unit. 42.030 42.890 0,990 43.090 0,190 43,690 23 24 Estimated User Fees 11.251.000 14.620,001 $4.811,000 15.097.000 15.387.000 49,514.371 24 1 100% Tax Diversion -vI Fee Adj. 1992-93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.) R.A ea 7/1192 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pe,1 FISCAL YEARS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2001 2002 5 Y.er rotor 6 Year Term LINE 1992 23 199391 1891-95 199596 190697 19921997 199)2002 10 Year Total LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 2 ftr rwe G Carry Oval from Lost Year 1])9B000 1)]82000 21228000 ]].856000 258II000 13399000 27A28000 13.799000 2 3 REVENUE 3 1 Share o1 I%Tea Allocation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 Fee.:lMualmil Waelo e1g0]0 968,W0 1.111.GOO 1.278.000 1.470.000 6.655.000 11.1oS.o00 17.070.000 5 5 U...F... 8,399,000 6.681,000 9,791,000 91000,000 9.231.000 13.998,000 6LU0,000 95.479,000 6 ) 1.......I K...n.mou —xv. 1.114,000 1.379.000 1.592.000 1.755.000 1.988.000 ]a2].OW 11.730.000 19.157.000 ] B Transfer from COP PUMI 147,000 121,IXW 15.1. I91,a00 199,oC0 920.000 070.000 1,790,000 a 9 Oft.,Revano. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 10 TOTAL REVENUE 10, o . 00 11052.000 11616.000 12,221000 12.)8B.000 58.210.000 75.586000 133.795.000 10 11 TOTAL AVMLABLE FUNDING 21289.000 28035,ow 32.971000 36.090000 39628000 72.009030 10]21]000 117590000 11 12 EXPENDITURES 12 13 SAn.of Joint Work.M 6 0 2]98.000 2,933,000 3.120,000 3.619,000 3,8011000 1IL410,000 26,214,000 42,821,000 13 11 Collection Sptem M 6 O and Other Oper. 1,698,000 I,a67,000 1,76G000 I,B38,000 1.830.000 8.])3.000 11.198,000 I9.871.000 14 16 COP Service 3130000 ]OOIOoo 4.042,000 1.952,000 6167,000 IB,IBB,000 25,06000 16033.OW 16 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 66161000 7801,000 9018,000 10,2380100 11001000 44.381.000 6J217.000 101628.0W Is 17 R....vine 6 Carry Over to Near Year 17J93,W0 21,228,000 23,866,W0 25,841,000 27A28.000 27.628.000 39.985.000 39,966.000 11 IB Next 1-,.Dry Pairxi FuMlnp R.Wlram.nl. 3,260.000 3.801.000 4.509.000 S.120,000 5164I,0,FO 6,SOI,WO 8.869,000 Coss. W 19 19 20%Comings...A..eIva 1303. 0 152100, 1.801.000 2,018000 2,]W WO 32W 000 I)8],000 3]B3 GJ0 19 20 Parton of lneunnce bnrn 13,332,000 15,90],WO 1),51].WO I8.6]].000 1983)WO 19.93].000 ]0.2210W 30,2NAW 20 21 USER FEE DATA ]t 22 Sins.FaMIY ReJEeoo.Wa Fee 114.64 I85A3 $81,99 189A2 $01.19 II01.81 22 23 Number of Mulvalenl Dwelling Lots 90R2B 99,428 99.128 1W,41 101.228 105.228 23 24 Estlmele!U..r F.a. 19.399,000 18,681.000 18,791.000 F9.000.000 19.231.000 II1.039.169 24 l I Sell e5A.w ynem l.HMrwrl 100% Tax Diversion Fee Adj. 1992-93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.11 Proxmire 7114MZ STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pol 1 FISCAL YEARS 1192 1993 THROUGH 2O01 =2 5-Ysertstel fiNeer Total LINE 199293 1593-94 1994.95 109696 1996-07 1992.97 1997 2002 10-Tsar Total LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 2 Reserves a Corr,Over From Leal Yale 13 240 G00 t3 245000 13,680,500 13,203,500 12,627,000 12.240.000 11.860.000 12,240,000 2 3 REVENUE 3 4 Share of I%Tax Allocation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 Fses:sediments Wesle 280.000 322,000 370.004, 426,000 490,M I,828'aa0 3,6o,'" 5,092,000 6 a Um Faes 5,907,0DO 6,080.000 6,4)0,004 7,128.000 ).)96.000 33.181.000 53,173.000 85.354,000 a Interest a MHoelHneous Income 801.000 046,000 947,000 9131000 862.000 4,568,000 4,570.000 9.138.000 ] 8 Transfer Inc.COP Funds 85,000 120.000 155,000 174,000 lot." 702,000 900.000 1.602,000 a 9 other Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 10 TOTAL REVENUE 6954000 )4]4000 7943000 8,041000 9329000 40340,000 82,447,000 103)8)000 10 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 19.194.00r) 20718000 21522.500 21634500 21956000 52,680,000 ]4,30],000 116027.000 11 12 EXPENDITURES 12 13 Share of Joint Works M 6 0 2,809.000 2.843,000 3.237,000 3.861,000 3.817.000 16,457,000 26,307,000 42,]]4.000 13 14 Collection System M 60 end Other Opec a65,OW BOB4OW 953,000 LOO1,oW Ip51,M 4,])8,000 8,I0D000 I0.178.000 14 is COP SeMce 22)6000 3.267500 /039000 4.746600 5128000 19476000 256400W 45116000 19 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 6848000 7138500 8229000 9307fi00 10095000 40720000 58,047,000 90)0)000 15 17 Reserves 9 Carry Oval to Next Year 13,245,000 13.SBO,50O 13,293,500 12.527,000 11,850,000 I1,B60.0oo 16,260,Wo 10,200,000 17 18 Nexl Year's Or,POlod Funding Re9ularm.n. 2,975,000 3.589,000 4,115.000 4.654,000 5.048.000 5,049,000 e1390.000, 6,390,000 18 18 20%Contingency Reserve 1190,000 1.428,000 1646000 1983000 3018000 2,019,og0 2,666.000 26b6000 19 20 FONon of Insurance Reserve 9,OB0,o00 8,58].600 ]fi33fiW 5.111000 4]93.000 4.]9J.000 71211 00 1314.000 20 21 USER FEE DATA 21 22 Illinois Fondly Reddence User Fee 6113P9 II1G90 $125.73 $137.68 0149.47 1230.01 22 23 Nomn.,of Equivalent OwBlllnp UNN 50,910 51,110 51450 GA10 52.180 53,910 23 24 Ballooed User Fen 65.707,000 66.080,000 1e,470,000 17,120,000 17J90,000 412,399.839 24 25% Tax Diversion 9113re2 CF 938.XL6 Bog PM No Fee Adj. 1992-93 - - - Fee adj. 1993-94 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.1 THRU 14 8113192 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pro.1 FISCAL YEARS 1092-1993 THROUGH 2O01 3002 S-Yeer TOW 6-Yaar Tell LINE 1992-93 199394 109L96 18868E 109497 1992.1097 1997-2002 10Yaar Tew LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 2 Renames G CerMOver From Len Yen 113,690,e00 113,880,000 120.940,250 124.728,760 128,048.500 113,690,000 I31,919 500 113,99%ODO 2 3 REVENUE 3 4 Sher.of for Tex Mlorses. 25,646.000 26.673.000 27.739.000 28.949.000 30,000.000 138,911,600 169.023.000 307.934.000 4 5 Feee:Industrial Wane 6.895,000 8,790.000 7.797.000 11,963.000 10,313.000 38.762.000 79.BBOA00 I19,732,000 5 B We,Feae 62,280,000 87.812,000 77,924.000 118,034,000 98.020.000 384.184,000 508,036.000 933,259.00e 6 T Interen B N9eolleneouB humus 8,129.000 8.389.000 9.7031000 9,031.000 8.176.000 01588,000 63.062,001) 97,260.000 T 8 Tmo.ler from COP Noun 1.868,000 2.011,000 2,300.000 2,678,000 2.797.000 11,736,000 13.886.000 25,610.000 8 8 Other go.-. 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 9 10 TOTAL REVENUE 83 828,000 111.464,000 124.303.000 137SM 000 151.017.000 019.170.000 906.625.000 1,621.706,000 10 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 107.416,000 225.344.01 246,243.2W 262,289.750 478.666.WG 731.76)," 1.037,553,500 1.637.386.000 11 12 EXPENDITURES 12 13 Shore 01 Jlnt Works M B O 40.e40.000 51.011,000 50.112.000 81,724.000 67.898.000 289.393.000 455.970.000 141,369.01 13 14 Collection System M G O aM Other Opeo 11,316.000 10.121.000 10.022.000 11.150.000 11.703.00) 64,912.e00 67,922,000 132,2A.000 14 15 COP S.M.. 33.673,000 43,271.70 53J90,500 SO.6BB,260 68.336,1100 269.620,600 341,112A70 800,0311,570 16 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 93,636p00 104.403.760 120.614,600 133,440,250 147.837.000 589,931.600 884.910.070 1,404,741.570 1B lT Reearvee 6 Cerrvo-r to Ne.t Year 113.8110.000 110.040.260 124.720.750 128.048.600 131.920.500 131.838.500 172.043,430 172.643.430 17 IB Ne.t vs.,..Dry P.HM NMI.,Rwoub.ment. 46.903.000 51.299.000 69.206, 0 65.676.000 71.042.000 74842.000 94.600.000 84.580.000 18 19 20%Contingency Recem 19.701.000 M.99O.000 24.103.800 26.689,200 29.687.000 29,587,800 38,497,40o 39,497,40e 15 20 Unmpmp or Poadou of It Raferve 49.269.000 48261.250 41.339,950m 38.483.300 58.488.700 J 29 190.700 a 39,686.03E 31,566030 20 21 USER FEE DATA 21 22 Single Ferny ReeNanoa User Fee 860.01 $77.78 88941 4101 9112.17 $141.86 22 23 Number of EWIl Ions Dwelling Ulta 844,704 848,374 049,694 864.124 8691809 099.584 13 14 EellmoMi User Fees,Excludes IRWD 6U,68a.000 55,812.000 75.624.000 05,834,000 66,436,000 120.190.418 24 25% Tax Diversion No Fee Adj. 1992-93 Fee Adj. 1993-94 COUNTY SANITATION 0ISTRICT NO.1 R.Vaol 811392 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pepe 1 NSCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2001 2002 19921997 19972M2 LINE 199293 1993-94 190106 1995-80 199591 6Yeer Told 6Yeer Told 10-Yeer Told LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 2 A...Y..6 Cm,,O x Flom Lon Yeer 9,135.000 )B41.00D 7,466,750 7,562,250 B 6W 000 91135,000 10,269,000 9,135,000 2 3 REVENUE 0 4 Sham of l%Tax Aieoellon 1.645.000 1,607,000 I1B71,000 I,738,000 I,8O8.000 8,38B.000 10.181,000 18,66gO00 4 5 Fme:IMueNd Wmle AO0.0op 460,000 528.000 O08.000 609.000 2.580.000 6,425,000 8.121,000 5 e U..Fall 5.541.000 7.500.000 9A47,000 11.283.000 13,282.OYO 41.193.000 59,446,000 117.029.000 6 Inlereel B h9eeetlemove thome 692,000 833.000 626,000 Sol." 663.000 2.804,000 4p94.. 7p68,000 ) 8 Tremler lmm COP WMe 291.000 271.000 308,000 338,000 260.000 1.661.000 IJ60,000 3.301,000. 8 B gOer A... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 TOTAL REVENUE 9350aW 10434000 13480000 14698000 18782000 02083000 91886000 164068000 10 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 17,494,000 18 2]600(1 19.948.750 22.25D.250 25,292,000 71,798,03D 102 261000 103,793,000 11 12 EXPENDITURES 12 M Shore of Jahn WoAe M 60 4,676,000 4.902.000 6,382.000 61e31P00 6,524,000 27,424.000 43,810,000 71,231,000 13 14 Commotion 8plem M b O eM Other Ooal. 6601000 803,000 ]1).000 763,000 781,000 3,694,000 4,696.000 S.1091000- 14 16 COP S.M.. 4 329.000 6,223,250 6198 600 7,005,254) 7,708,000 30,511,000 311640 000 00 051.000 18 16 TOTALEXPENDMURE6 8643000 10900.250 11184600 13750250 16013000 81629000 86946000 1I901.000 16 17 Revrvee 6 CempOvW M than Year 7,841,000 ),456,)50 7,652,260 8.500.000 10,280.000 10,309,000 16,310.000 15,319.000 IJ 18 van Yeei.0,PetlM Fordo, 4,827,000 8,404,000 6,147,000 6,876,000 7.511,000 7,512.000 9A13.000 0,613,000 is 19, 20%COinim maY Rmem 1931,000 2M2000 2460000 3760000 3008000 30p5,000 2846000 3846000 IB 10 Ponlon ollmureme Reeerwo 1083,000 (993801 1963)501 11136,000) 12480001 12480001 IBSI.000 1,801,000 30 21 USER HE DATA 21 22 51.0.FmMY Red4eme IN.,F. 176.00 0102.23 F121.51 0152.80 $178.07 $184.49 21 23 NumOer of Equlvdenl Char ns Udm 73,990 73.960 7I,090 74.300 74,690 )),090 23 24 EBBmele4 U..,Fee. 66,611,O00 17,660,000 IB.N],OW 411,363.000 113,292,000 614,222.334 24 C 25% Tax Diversion No Fee Adj. 1992-93 c"-'e`R'-""•?"A°°"?ah Fee Adj. 1993-94 COUNTY SANrtATION DISTRICT NO.2 R.A.W B213N1 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CABIN FLOW Partial FISCAL YEARS 1992-1 GOP THROUGH 20DI-2002 6-Year Tom 6 Year Tole[ UNE 1992.93 Ie11Y84 199L.s 1996se 19BG97 1591-1097 1897-1002 10.Yen Tolel UNE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 2 Reserves N CarrYOver From Lain Yea 20843000 26118000 18517 16200000 20081000 2684300(f 313661)(ND 18843000 2 3 .REVENUE 3 4 SM.ofl%Tee Anionnen B,B2B4O00 7,101.000 ),]06.000 7.BBD,000 ).88].000 30,881.000 ".sea," 81.989,WD 4 B FnnlMuaftlal Weola 2.260.000 2,689,000 1.878.000 2,412.000 3,938,000 16,171." 30.61Y000 45.682.000 0 B Ueer Fen 15,817A00 20.874,000 25,032A00 18.288,000 33.602,01DID 114,081.000 180,878,000 305.668,000 8 ) Intemt3 Mevallmmoua Loran 1,913.000 1.)]4,000 1.009,000 I.917.000 2.134.000 9,456,1)1 14.047,000 23.603.000 ) B Transfer from COP Fund. 822.00D e13.000 712.000 BOI.00o 837.000 3,485,000 4,176,000 7.BW.000 B 9 Other Revenue O 0 O 0 0 O 0 O 8 10 TOTALREVENUE 27260000 33116DOOo 37813000 43108000 0568W0 188"4. O 214.600000 404374000 10 Il TOTAL AVAMBLE FUNDING W093000 680880W 01440.000 89300000 ))340000 116611OOo 30e OSB000 48121)000 11 12 EXPENDITURES 12 13 SMre of JNnl Worke M 6 O 16.789.000 10,558,000 I9,214,000 20.035,000 22.038.00D 92,036,000 140,006.000 240.640p00 13 14 Coloration ByslemM 6 O an!Door 00n. 2.090.000 3,200,000 2.31/,000 1.430,000 3,553,13,30 11.599.000 14,8I0.01(a) 20.409.000 14 16 COP Samoa 11096, W 13J80000 1678000 181WrJ00 20.289000 0002)000 10112300(f) 181249000 IB 10 TOTAL EXPENDITURES, 29074000 33643000 37140000 40616000 N890030 104261000 38403700o 408298000 1s 17 Reserves A CerrµOnr to Neat Year 35,119.000 25.627.00D 10,100.000 20.681,00D 31.360.OW 32,390,000 41.819.000 42.919. W 17 1B Nm Yeeia Dr,Print WMrp RepuOwmnn 14A87,000 16.371,0OD 18,620.000 30,308,000 22.446,000 22,445.000 18.489,000 29.490.0100 10 19. 20%Cantlegar,a Y Resere 6786Oo3 85081000 744800D 8123000 8.978000 0978 COO I10W Oo0 11.800000 19 20 PPNon of Ing—roe Reorve I037,000 2J48000 133.000 2W,000 9330W 833000 1820,000 !:-LE 10 30 21 USER FEE DATA 11 11 Single Famly Ratio—War Fee 1W.W 679.90 194.19 I109.69 S124.89 $131.64 21 33 Nmm,el EaulvelOn ComEq UNfe 263,783 264,350 285,508 287.233 309,633 281,033 23 24 Ead—Vad Uaer FeOa $t8,827. W 420.874.000 610.032,000 129.286,000 433,663,000 $36.967.081 24 25% Tax Diversion No Fee Adj. 1992-93 Fee Adj. 1993-94 COUNTY SAN1FA11ON DIBTWCT NO.3 R.H.M 8113m2 6TATEMINT OF PROJECTED CASH ROW P.Pe I FISCAL YEARS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2O01-1002 &Y..Total 6-Yeer ToW "ME 19...3 1093.94 1994B6 1985-85 1980-97 1992.1981 1097-2002 IOY.a T.al LANE 1 OPERATING FUND I 1 Romome.A CerrVOver From Les,Year 34.6])000 33688000 36467000 36734000 36069000 3463)000 14110000 34637000 2 3 REVENUE 3 4 BMre 011%Tax All000mOn 11,741.000 9.089,000 9,453.000 9,842,000 10,2311.000 47,380,000 61,,568.001, 108,048,000 4 6 Fee.:IMoatiel Wn,e "Boo," 2.186,004 Z613,000 2.AW.= 3.324.000 12.612.000 26,))2.000 38,684,000 6 6 User Fen 16.048,00D 11,307.000 24,397,000 27,334,000 "',too,000 120,180,000 199,930,000 319.11 COX) 6 IMem,4 Mecallev....lreome 2,607,000 2,636,000 2,610.000 1.629.000 ].8)3.000 I2.963.000 12.030.00n 26,889,000 1 e Tmmeler Frmn COP WWa 606,000 687.000 800.000 Bs6.000 97%000 3.08e,000 4.890,000 81))9,000 B B o1Mr Re"Mr, 0 0 O O 0 O O 0 8 10 TOTAL REVENUE 30610030 36913000 ^.A.,o00 43e080n0 47511000 18)12e000 30109)000 488213000 10 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 66"7 000 69 411 000 76140000 79,343,00D 83,579,000 231,653,000 336 3BT 000 633)80000 11 12 EXPENDITURES 12 13 6Aereal JWm Wek4 MA O Ie,ee8,000 1),47).000 18.226,000 31.140,000 23,383,000 97,)81,000 166.224,000 284.006.000 13 14 Collection System M 60 aM O1Mr Omr. 4,43S.000 2,800,000 3,046.000 3.I97.000 3A67.000 19.934,00D 18.476.000 38,410,000 14 16 COPS.M.e 10346000 1)6)7000 17136000 18930000 22.649, W 02630000 113060070 196699070 16 1B TOTAL EXPENDITURES 31448000 33964000 39aosa00 43276000 49260000 18)363000 288660070 180003070 16 17 Rmmm.6 Cxm,Ooer to Next Year 33,699.000 36,467.000 36j34,000 30,068,000 24,310,000 - 34.310.000 46.746.930 48,740.930 17 IB Nen Y..,.Dry Pe6aE FoMbp Ro,Irem V. 15.725.000 I6,9)),000 19J03,000 21,639,000 24.636.0041 24.636.000 32.170,000 32,170." 10 19 20%Con6rgoe,Re.em 6290000 5791000 7691000 8666000 8994000 9864 GOD 12 BIN X" '3 IN o0o IB 10 Foram of I....R.... 118n3.000 11,989000 8160000 6))6.000 11780001 11)90001 I)OB,930 1 )088]0 20 21 USER FEE DATA H 22 B6roe Family Reoldeme Uecr Fee 400.00 Q6.78 $06.19 $90.59 0107.01 $169.33 22 23 NVxRxU 01 E4wvnem D"Ilm,Uk, 280.600 291.105 291.095 283,990 294,095 288.66D 13 24 EHlme,ed U..,Feu 916.840,000 421,307.000 024,297,000 437,334.000 $30.400,000 $46.136.595 24 25% Tax Diversion No Fee Adj. 1992-93 Fee Adj. 1993-94 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.6 IIaH4M 8113/91 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH ROW Ppe 1 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 1001-2001 &Year Toll 6-Yeer TOW LINE 1092-93 199394 1sales 108G90 189bW 19W-IR97 19972002 lOYsar Total LINE 1 OPERATING FUND - 1 1 Meeme A CerrYOrer Fron Leal Year 8784000 930000D 10334000 IO948000 10983fi00 8784000 10860600 87840W 1 3 REVENUE 3 4 Shot.0 l%Tee Memories 2,112,000 3,116pW 2,284.000 1,316.000 1.470.000 11,437,000 I3,916,000 28,363,000 4 6 Feee:INurWtl Wool. 80,000 88,000 67.000 )).0m 99.000 341,000 087,000 1.OI9.000 6 6 User Feee I.M. 00 1.064.000 3.038,000 31317.000 3,388,000 14,808,000 18,780.000 34,304.000 6 ] Inters.6 Wevellenewe imams 632,000 684,000 746,000 768,000 )]3.000 3.613,000 3.006.000 7A10.000 ] S Transfer from COP FUMe 314.000 114.000 164.0110 146.000 431.000 se0AC0 830,000 1,499,000 8 0 Other R—. 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 R 10 TOTAL REVENUE 8008 e83e000 8288000 6684000 60e1000 30761LOOo 38M,0I 09603000 10 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE LANDING 13882000 182Se 000 16623000 17433000 17844500 39883000 49R0I500 )838)000 Il 12 EXPENDITURES 11 13 Shiro of Mint WwY M60 1.756.000 I.e71000 1.060,000 3,368,000 2.493,000 10,473,000 16.73a,000 17.208,000 13 14 Ce0w11en 6yNem M 60am Odor Opel. 768.000 )8),000 837.000 S78.000 913.000 4.19%. RANT,000 8.647.000 14 18 COP 8m,1ee 1078000 3183000 2878000 3306600 3 .3000 13817600 17316000 ]123]600 IB 10 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4623000 4882,000 6)74000 8449600 0878000 28688800 39403000 67989600 18 17 Rsrervn i Celry-0en W N.Yaer 9.30O000 10,334,000 10,848.000 10.883,600 IO,0ea,6C0 10,060.600 10.3881600 1g388,600 17 19. No.Yeeir Dry Petla6 Fondle Rep6remen4 1.161.000 1,451.000 2.9R),000 3,32... 3,43%. 3,439.000 4,]3],000 4,327,000 18 I9 20%CoWnpeneY Rnem 804000 982000 1166000 12R0000 1378000 1376000 1,731,000 1 731000 IB 10 PoNbn of Insurme.Priem 6186 000 a 861000 a 80]000 6A68 800 0161 600 a 181 S0O 4 340 ROD •un EGG 20 21 USER FEE DATA 12 Moore FmNlY Amoki eUser Fee 476.00 I1W.F2 $113.45 $119.N $125.46 0166.04 11 13 NumOer of EquAAenl Dwelllp UNu 26,533 2a,633 26,793 20,933 17.083 27,933 23 24 ENmaled User Fees 06R90.000 I2,9e4.000 13,030.000 13.117.000 63.390.000 $4a43.061 24 25% Tax aversion Huw,_Hte9a 244Nt-P..e No Fee Adj. 1992-93 Fee Adj. 1993-94 . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.8 Reu4ea 8114192 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Partial RBCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 5001-2005 6 Year TOW 5 Year Total LINE 1991-93 189344 199ASS 19.68e 189697 1992-1897 1987d002 16Yeer TatJ UNE 1 OFFRATINO FUND 1 2 Arearns 6 CelrYO rar From Loot Year 6,741,000 7,239,000 >066000 7,450.000 6,5011000 6,741,03D fi O61 000 0,741,000 2 3 REVENUE 3 4 Share of 196 Tex Allocation 1,100,000 I,1H.000 1.110,000 1,538,000 1,388,000 6,BBOpW 7,200,O0", 13,110,000 4 5 Feac lnai Warne 178.000 201.000 131,000 288,000 306,000 1,178,000 2,376.000 3.554,000 5 6 Ueer Fen 2.784.O00 3.381pW 3.621,000 3.868.000 4,099,000 17.747,000 32,426,000 60,171,000 6 in.,..6 IS...U..Imams 517.000 680.00D 6117.000 513.000 424.M 2.681,000 1,38B,o00 2.949,000 ) 8 Transfer from COP WMe 32,000 63,000 85,000 114,000 121,000 422.000 670.000 882,000 8 9 Other Reveme O O 0 O 0 O 0 0 9 10 TOTALREVENUE I608000 8343000 5e91000 6M0 6238000 27899000 44018000 ]I80)000 10 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 11348000 11681o0o 13346.000 13440000 12739000 34.610000 49,098000 76638000 It 12 EXPENDITURES 12 13 Share of Joint WOhe M 6 O 2,573,000 2.899,000 2,960,000 2,I06,000 3.s83.Ooa 16,1M,000 14.157,000 30.237,000 13 14 Collard—a"..M 6 O eM Other OF., 301.000 316.000 332,000 348,000 366,000 1.664,000 3,150000 3,781,000 14 Is COP.Serve. 1336000 1.all'" 3596000 3321000 3728000 I2796000 18.646000 314b 000 16 t6 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4110000 4926000 6998,Op0 68380110 7,088000 28,669,000 4409I000 74.451000 1S I) Reserves 6 CarryOwr tO Next Year 1.339.000 7.055.000 7,450,000 8,101.000 6.061.OW 6.051,000 4,1]).000 4.1)).000 17 19 Neat Yesis Dry PeAod FUMIry Re i—. 2,066,000 5.462,000 3,849,000 3.470.000 ],9M.0W ],eN,OW 4,991,000 4.881,000 18 1B 50%Contlnpam,Rearm 851000 886 2W 1.179.2011 1.307.200 1 fi3)600 1 53)800 1.996 SCO 1 886 S00 IB 20 PoNon of lnrvremeRuern 49B3.000 4,108800 3311.800 Ie43300 13306001 13306001 11,910,2001 1S 810200 10 21 USER RE DATA 21 22 Senate FeMlY ReeMeme War Poe 165.00 078.91 $84.23 I93.69 494.81 $181.88 22 83 NumMr,o1 Eoulm.nl D a."Im LAW, 42,830 42.880 42.990 N,090 43.190 43,690 23 24 Eatlmsted War Fen 12,784.000 13.384.000 13.621.000 I3,858.000 14.000.000 $7,941.337 14 25% Tax Diversion No Fee Adj. 1992-93 Fee Adj. 1993-94 CDDNFY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.) R.A..d 80393 STAIIMLM OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pope 1 FISCAL YEARS 18921993 THROUGH 3001 2002 S-Yeer Total B-Y..Total LINE 1992-93 1993-94 199498 I995-96 199691 1992-1997 1997 2001 IO Too,Tmel LINE 1 OFERATINa FUND 1 2 R... .B C.T C ni,From Last Va., 13,799,001) 1B BOB 000 10,997,00D 22,535,00C) 24 @3 000 13)99,000 28100 13]99.000 2 3 REVENUE 3 4 Shins.11%To.AN...Dan 3,313.000 3,456,000 3,894,000 3,738.000 3.898,a00 17.899,000 11.904,000 391903.000 4 5 Fe a.:Inal.wal W... MOST 989,000 1.111.000 1.178,000 1.00,000 5.885,00D I1,408,OOo 1),0)0,000 5 a U...Fe.. 3.9119,000 5,138,000 6,190,000 5,363,000 5,343.000 -34,892.000 28.010.000 53.902.000 B Inlerael&W...Pa....1.Ome 1.074,000 1,294,000 1.502.000 1.958.000 1,704.000 7,312,000 10.903.000 18,316,00D ) a Tr...In,lrom COP Fund. 147,000 124.000 159,000 191,000 199,oDo 820.000 970,000 1,780,000 9 9 Other Rawwe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 TOTAL REVENUE 9,353.000 10 888 000 11 68B oa0 12,127,000 12 a89 000 56.688.000 73 193000 139 9E0,0DO 10 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 13 163 000 27 604000 31,853,000 34 892 a0a 37,107,000 70,487,000 99,298,M 143,679,000 11 12 EXPENDITURES 12 13 BMre of Joint Want.M 6 0 3,798,000 1,933,000 3,230,000 3,848,000 3,904.000 16,410,000 28,314.000 42.814.000 13 14 Collection 9ptem M B 0 am OtMr Open. 1.690,000 I.667.000 1d50,000 1.839,000 1.830.000 8,))3.00D 11.I98.000 19,971.000 14 16 OOP Samoa 21300D0 ]OD)000 4041000 0963000 6167000 19198000 261135000 45.033ODO 14 18 TOTAL EXPENDITURES B61B000 )SD)000 9018000 10.239000 11001.000 44361.000 83117000 107838.000 16 17 Aenrvee 6 Cia Oyer to No.Va., 16,036,000 19,997,000 33.638,000 34,423,00D 3e,109,000 34,100.000 36.051.000 30,051.000 11 is Neot Year'.Dry Parted Runs,R.,iremenle 3,258,000 3,904,000 4.809,000 5,120,000 6,601.000 6.601.000 6,989,000 6,969,00p 18 19 20%Conrinpency Reserve 1303000 1831000 1004,000 3.049001) 3300,OOD 1.100,011 3]83000 3)931. 19 30 p0nlen 011nwrerree Reserve 130)6000 l4 B)]000 1B 233000 1].268.000 18408.000 18.408.000 ]0.308,000 3B309 OOD 30 21 USER FEE DATA 21 22 S no.Fine,Stan...User Fee $ 0.00 $51.58 151.99 $61.40 $52.7e 154.96 22 23 Number of Ec,ownlent D—Ulna UM1. 99,228 99,428 99.928 100,438 101,228 105,228 33 24 Eellmeled War Fee. 13.909,000 16,139,000 06.1901" 86,383,000 F5,343,000 $5,782,270 24 (\ 25% Tax Diversion No Fee adj. 1992-93 Fee adj. 1993-94 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.11 ReWed 7114192 6TATEMFNT OF PROJECTED CASH ROW Ppe 1 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 1001 =2 S-Yeer TaU 6 Yea,T.ml LINE 1992.93 1G93-94 199+95 199G96 1996.97 1992-97 1997.2002 IOYeer Tofsl LINE 1 OPERATNG FUND 1 2 Aa..r .e B Cah,-0 ,Fran Lat Yee, 12240000 12559000 13843600 126O3.SO0 11))7000 12,240090 1004I000 13240000 2 3 REVENUE 3 4 Sham 0f 1%Tm Allooe9on 1.889,000 2.089,000 2,162,000 2,238.000 2.328.000 10,])0.000 13.115. 0 23.891,000 4 6 Fen:lmlaldal WMe 280.000 322,000 370,000 420400) 490.000 1.989.000 3.804,000 6,892.000 5 a User Fee. 3,056.000 4.011,000 4,319,000 4,890.000 8.468,000 11.742,000 40.067,000 61,798,000 a IMemst 6 Mece6anwa Imam 877,000 898.000 093,000 054,000 799,000 4,318,000 41181.O00 a,b00,000 ) 8 Tremma fmm COP WMs so," 128.000 I65,000 174,000 181.O011 702,000 900,000 1,802,t100 8 9 oft,R... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 10 TOTALREVENUE 0297000 7424000 7899000 9,602000 9260,000 39.42700O 'LO91000 101.4000 10 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 18607000 18982.000 20731500 11084.500 2104]000 51E07.000 ]]004000 113 724.000 11 12 EXPENDITURES 12 13 Slara of John Waft M A O 2,909,OOD 2,943,000 3,237,000 3.581.000 3.911.000 18,467.000 26,507.00O 41.))4,000 13 14 Ca0eadon 6yman M a O aM Mmr Onr. 805.000 808,0oo 953,000 1,001.000 1.051.000 4,))8.000 6.100.000 10.8118.000 14 16 COP S.M. 2.176.000 3,287,500 4.038.000 4746600 6128000 19475.000 26040000 45116.000 Is Is TOTAL EXPENOMRE6 6840000 7.138500 8219000 9307.500 1006,000 40720000 68047000 99)0)DOD 18 17 Rnema a Caw,O aN.M Y.., 12.068,000 12.943.6D0 lZGD2.50D 11.777.00O 10.947.O0() I0.947,000 14.957.000 14.957,000 17 18 Next Yeefe Dry PeaM WMIp RpNmmana 2,976,000 3.508,D00 4,I15,000 4,654.000 6.049,000 5.049.000 813901000 6,2901000 18 19 20%Con6n6emy Bosom 1190000 1428,00D 1640000 1862000 t019000 2A19,OOD 1fibO W0 3659000 19 20 Pattie.of Imu..Rea.n. 8 393 7,846.500 6,)41 6O0 5 261 000 1080.000 3 800 000 8,011,000 8011000 20 21 USER ME DATA 11 22 SIr 1.FmMly Reshm—U..,Fee F60.00 079.48 $83.91 094.38 2104.84 $177.45 22 23 Numaer of Elhmmat OaWlin UMW 60,91D 61.110 61,460 51,810 IMAGO b3.910 23 24 E.SmatM Ueer Fee. 13.Ob6.090 44,011.000 $4,319,000 04.690,000 1"S."91000 00,586.330 14 100% Tax Diversion No Fee Adj. 1992-93 ena9x cF_aiaxLs so)AM Fee Adj. 1993-94 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.i THRU 13 811392 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH ROW Fargo I FISCAL YEARS 1992 1993 THROUGH 1001 2002 SYMH TOW S-YwrTnul LINE 1992-93 199394 188496 1985-98 199697 1992 1997 1997-2002 IRYoo TLlol ONE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 S Ronrvn i CngOwr R.LM,Yoor 11].680.000 8)A)3.000 95.341.350 96014.760 95.835.600 1131590.000 96A36.600 113.5901000 S 3 REVENUE 3 BMro al l%Tev All—don 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 1 5 Fwo:INUMrHI WoHo 6.886.000 6.790.000 )J9).000 8.107.000 10AI3,. 311,752,000 79,B60,000 119.732,000 6 6 War Fwo 62.288,000 94,286,000 106,3e),000 11S,882.0Oo 128,615,000 49),16).000 )69,6)1,000 1,36),130,000 6 Int—at IS MFeWorxwo Immrs 7,168,000 6,386'" 6,621,000 6,733,000 S,806.000 33,726.000 38.415.000 72,I4I,OJO ) 8 Trmolor Iron COP fordo 1.168.000 2.011.000 2,380.000 3.679,000 2.)9).000 11.736,000 13.866,000 25.520.000 8 9 OIMr Rowruo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 10 TOTAL REVENUE 67,319.000 I09,473,000 116,166,000 I36.161,000 148.580.000 686.600.000 89I.B5I.000, 1,1)1.8]1.000 10 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE MERMAID 190,9011,000 196]46,000 214.629,260 158.276J60 2N,376.500 5116.370,000 989,389,60o 1.6a9,221.000 11 16 EXPENDITURES 12 13 SNro of Joha WeAF M 60 ".6441,000 61.011,Oo0 58,113.000 01J2I.000 67A99,000 285.393,000 466.976,000 741.369.000 Is 14 Colloodon Sptom M 6 0 oral OtMr Door. 11,316.000 10,12'.. 10,666,000 t1,160,000 I1,703,. 64,911.000 67.861,000 113.)3(000 1/ 15 COP S.M. 33,6)2,000 43,3)1,)50 63,)60.500 80,666.2w 68,336.000 359.568.500 341.112,070 600,838,670 16 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES Bi,6i6.00o IOLWi.)60 I30.61/.600 1]iAX0,160 147,937,00D 699,9]1.600 084.110,070 1,454.741,570 16 17 Rare—B CaHVOvor to Nan Year 9),3)3,000 83.3/1R60 94.014.7W 96,036,60o 96,/36,600 98,436.601) 123,09,"0 123,479.430 17 1B Nod Yoeio IN,Period Furdl"Ropulromonto /8,903,000 51,299,000 68,286,000 65,678,000 72,942,000 72,842,000 91,680,000 91,6110,000 1S 19 20%Con0,,R000rw 19.)OB4O00 SO.BBO.000 3a.10].800 16.OBB.lOa 29,687.800 29.687.800 38.I97.M3 28.I97.oOO 19 SD Uny0rp9 or Portion of lwureme Rwerw 23A03,OJ0 30.163.350 t0.OS1.BW i,QO.]00 I6,B91A001 IS,B91.]COI 9.68T.9)01 18.68),1701 SO 11 USER FEE DATA 11 SS 91ryle FwNIY RooldsrHo War Fro I6o.01 1109.27 $121.09 II34.39 I14).0) $183.40 16 13 NurMer of EWYA.rl Ort"M UNH 844.704 916,374 849,691 S".118 859.600 889.594 23 24 EetlmelM Uear Far..EecRrdn IRWD 64688,000 96,486,000 1WA87.000 111.791,000 116A15,000 163.232.779 14 100% Tax Diversion No Fee Adj. 1992-93 ........s."' a.,e. - -I Fee Adj. 1993-94 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO,1 RM.W 7114193 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH ROW P.,I FISCAL YEARS 1922 1293 THROUGH 2O0I.2002 1992-1997 1997-2002 LINE 199253 1993.94 199485 19960a 199693 5-Y..r Total 5Yee,Toll IGY..r Tmel LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 1 R...—A C.,,Over R.Le.I Yet, 9136000 0199000 6)40)50 6807260 6519000 91 13 910 00 11143000 813s," 1 9 REVENUE ] ♦ She,.011%ne All-ennn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a F...:Irel-orl We.w 4001000 48Q000 628,000 608,000 699,000 2IHIL000 6,425.000 S.121,000 5 6 mn F... 5.641,000 9.167.000 11.119,000 13.09LOOD 15.090.000 54.006.000 80.028,000 124,035.000 8 ) ..A..B AS...nemeu 1.— 625,000 415,000 599,000 416,000 5071OGO 2.281.000 2,B41.000 0,170.000 ) 9 TAM.,awn COP FUM. 2111,000 274.000 300.000 339.000 350,000 I.66I.00o 1,760,000 21201.0W 9 8 OIMr R.v.mu 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 6 10 TOTAL REVENUE 6)6)000 10310. 1]]55000 14481000 1e640000 Bg618C00 B109IOOo 151628.000 10 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 16992000 10,666000 18101760 20268250 22166000 626)1. 19234000 180)6]000 11 12 EXPENDITURES 12 13 She.a1 Johm W.A.M S O 4.676.000 4.902.000 5.292.000 6,921.000 6.624.000 27,424,000 43,910,000 71,224,000 13 14 Coa-floe Spum M 6 O.M Cox,Op.r. a6g000 683,000 717,000 762,000 781.000 2,694,000 4,685.000 8.1801" 14 16 COP S.M.. 122E000 6,222250 5I86.600 ).Oab]50 ))00,000 205,LOGO 386b000 69051000 16 I6 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 11053000 tO8O8,250 12284500 137502511 160]]000 81628000 86846000 NB♦NOCO is IJ Renme B CnMOwr to Next Year 6,239,000 6J45J50 5,807,160 0.518,000 8.141.000 11,I42,000 12,286LOoo 12,289,000 17 IB Next Text.Dry Petlwl FuMino Re"Immente 4,827,000 5141041000 5.147.000 0,976,OOo 7,512,000 7,512,00o B,al],OOo 11,613,000 19 1B 20%ConMnseneV Rnerw 1831,000 ].10],00D I458000 1760000 3006,000 3005,000 2845.00o 3945.000 19 20 Ponlon of Inmrmoe Reserves 1519.000) 0,619 2501 I2J90J501 1]106,0001 12,275,0001 12,375.0001 II 168,0001 I11 IOB4O001 30 21 USER FEE DATA 11 22 Slrgle FwrYV ReeMeme Wn Fee 176.00 6123.98 1160.07 1176.19 1202.31 0213.02 12 22 NumMr.1 EWlvlenl Dwelllrp UM. 72,BaO 73.9E0 74,090 74.30D 74.590 77,080 13 24 E.AAH&I U..r F... Ba,541,00o 12,10.000 111,119,000 112,091.000 116.090.000 Ila,421,712 24 100% Tax Diversion No Fee Adj. 1992-93 Fee Adj. 1993-94 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.2 R.A..7114MZ STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW P. .I FISCAL YEARS 1992-1913 THROUGH 2O01- 0 Z 6 Y—ToW S Yeer Totel LINE 199293 199304 1891.. 1 199087 1992-1997 19972002 10 You TotW LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 S R..—&C.,,0—Fmm Lnt V..r 10043,000 18040000 17,820000 18,0400W 10,930,000 28,843,000 22.948.00,C) 28,843.000 2 3 REVENUE 3 4 SMr.a/1%T.a All—ei— o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 Fee.:IMu.18Y Wall. 2.250.000 3.588,000 5.975.000 3.452.000 3,035.000 15,17I,OW 30,612,0W 45.6113.000 5 0 0...F.. 16,827.. 1).2)4,030 32,418,000 30,904,000 41.040.000 154.927.000 225,B52.00O 380,888,000 0 ) In1re.t8 AS..elI.-1— 1,575,000 1.553.000 1,550.000 1.318AW 1,490,000 8,883,000 10,044,. 16,827.000 ] 8 Tren.4r 11om COP FuM. 622,000 813,W0 7121. 9G1.IXp 537.000 3,405.000 4.175,000 7,8B0000 0 9 Other Ill. s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 lO TOTAL REVENUE 20171000 33428000 37354000 43505000 4)908.000 1.0,3418.000 270,593,00 450,959,000 10 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FLINGING 47014000 50468.000 56580.000 60546000 67838,000 207109,000 193,541,000 4)).805,000 11 12 EXPENDITURES 12 13 Shin.I J.InI Woh.M 6 0 16,)88,000 10,568,000 10.214.000 10,036,000 33,039,000 95,036,000 146,005.000 240.640,000 13 14 Co4e.Non System M B 0 OM O1Mr Ga., 2,099.000 5,304.000 2.314.000 2.430.000 3.555.000 11,699.000 14,810,000 20.408,000 14 16 COP S.M.. 11098,000 13780." 16.712000 18160000 20299,000 90,027.000 101353.000 181249,000 16 10 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2B974.M0 35,545,000 37240000 40.615.000 ".890.000 I84.261,000 284037,000 .9,298.000 I6 17 Rv.—B C.r,O-r to N..Y— 19,04D000 17.92e,000 19,040.000 19,930.000 25,948,000 15,948,000 29,W4,000 29,504,000 17 18 Nen Y—.Dry PetlM F..IN R.Wlrxrwm. 14.487,000 16,371.000 IS"... 50,308,000 22,NS,. 22.446,000 29.499.000 29.499,000 IB 19 20%Con9n9.my R..— 5J95.000 6.508,W0 7A48000 8.153000 8.978,000 8,978,000 11,BOOp00 11.800,000 19 20 P.Non.I lmm-we A...m. 11.242,0001 H.953,0001 18,018,0001 Ie,601.W01 (e,475.000) I9.475.0001 Ill 795,0001 111,795,0001 20 21 USER FEE DATA 21 25 F.Mly IN.Wence U..r Fee 100.00 0105.92 $122.09 $138.32 1154.51 4145.11 25 13 Num6.r el E4ulvNenl DwAin9 UNu 263,783 264,358 265,608 287.233 289.633 281.033 13 24 E.Xmeu6 U..,F.e. 116,82),000 12),974,000 132,416,000 138,884,000 141,846,000 446.502.392 24 100% Tax Diversion cM.ae Ie en r No Fee Adj. 1992-93 -qe Fee Adj. 1993-94 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.] RBWetl)]1,92 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pe0e1 FISCAL YEARS 1922 1213 THROUGH 2001-2002 5-Year Total 6 Yeer Total LINE 199293 1883.91 199A.95 199598 129897 1992 1997 1997-2002 10 Year Total LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 2 Reserves 6 Carr,Over From Lan Year 31537000 21512000 25,873,000 251951 21719,000 31,5]),0W 22,081000 31,63].000 2 ] REVENUE 3 1 6M1en oll%Tax Allocation O 0 0 O 0 0 O O 1 6 Feen lMuntltl West. I,900A00 2,186.000 2,613,000 2,890,000 2,331,000 13,812,000 25,))2,000 1S.681.000 6 8 User Fees I2,919,000 30,b8,GW 33.780.000 3].1)8,000 10.8]3.OW ISB.B25.000 35p,691,000 115,110,000 0 Intneeli Mis COPE.lncorm 3,1]0.000 I,836,OW 1,85p,000 1.81),000 1,899,Oo0 9,3)],WO 8,]15.000 1],]23.W0 ) B OtherTransfer lrom COP Furls 6pp,0o0 p8),OW 800.000 816,000 WB,000 3.BBB.OW I,BBO,000 BJ>p,00a 8 9 OIM1sr Rawnue 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 B 10 TOTAL REVENUE 2112/,000 35116,000 ]81829000 13788000 1p,831,000 181,900,000 295,598000 180198,000 to 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 55961,000 69627000 61,602,000 579a4,. )1,35],000 219,137000 317.892000 6160360W 11 12 EXPENDITURES 12 13 Share of Joint Works M L 0 Ip,86p,C00 1],41],OW 18.225,000 21,118,000 23.263,000 97J81,000 166,221,000 251,006,000 13 11 CNIBmIan Swtem M L 0 aW Ol.,Opar. 1,136,000 2.900.000 9,015,000 3,197,000 3,357,000 18,831,000 I9.476,000 36.110,000 11 I6 COP Samoa 10.318,000 13,5]]000 17,136.000 18.830000 22.649.000 82.636,000 113850070 195,589,070 16 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 31.119,WO 33,954,000 39 1G6,000 I3 2)6 GM 19 289,000 197,353,Oo0 286 550,0)0 186A03,070 1p 17 Rasnwa L Call 0-1 to Near Year 21,512.000 25,6)].000 26,198,000 21,718,000 22,081,000 22.081,000 29.031.930 29,031.930 17 IB Nen YBeia Dry Pe6ad Funi RBWimirenta 15.725.000 16,W],000 19J03.000 21.638.000 21,635.000 21.635,000 ]2,1)0,000 32,170,000 16 I9 20%Coatings,Reserve 6,290,OOp 6,791.000 7,881,00D .,.as.. 9,851,000 S,SSI,. 12ASS.000 12,868.0001 IB 20 Portion of lmonnw Reserve 2,197.000 1,805,000 12.380,0001 15,574.0001 112.105,0001 02.106.0001 II6,006,0701 116,008,0701 20 21 USER FEE DATA 31 22 SIn91e FUMIY ResWenee Uwr,Fee 160.00 0I08.I6 $119.76 $131.37 $143.03 4202.34 22 23 Nwroer of Epolvalmi Dwelling Unix 280.800 261,165 2.11885 282.990 281,085 289,560 23 24 EnimetBd Uor Fns 115.848.000 130,408,00D 133,760,000 13),1]5.000 110.033,000 168,689,670 24 100% Tax Diversion No Fee Adj. 1992-93 .re_nA - rle.r --I Fee Adj. 1993-94 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.6 ReNaeJ 7I14M2 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Peter 1 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2001-I00 2 S'Yesl Tote, ISY-Torel LINE 19.293 199394 189L96 199696 189b17 19921997 19972002 10 Year Total LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 2 Rnerne i Carry-Onr From Laet Year B)BA,OW )11)0,000 7,9113,00(1 8,326,000 9,274,500 8784.000 8.058.500 11784000 2 3 REVENUE 3 A Share of 1%Tor Allocetlon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 5 Fuc lrimltltl Wen. 60,000 6•,000 63.000 )),000 89.000 341,000 8p,000 11028.000 5 8 Lear Fe.. 1.990,00"1 6.OW.A 6,323.000 5,692,000 6.eM. 23.833.000 33.713.000 67,S46,000 6 ) Warren Mi-an----I-eme 651.000 533,000 573,000 683,000 574,000 2,817,000 I.667,000 5.384,000 ) B Trembr Nan COP F.M. 314.000 121.0W 154,000 110,000 131,000 Ba9,00to 630,000 1,419,000 B Other R.- 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 9 10 TOTAL REVENUE 2908000 6))500,3 8117000 8398,000 11562,000 2),860,000 3),69)000 6545)000 10 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 11693000 12946000 14100000 14)34000 18836,600 36.544.000 e5,655,500 74.211000 11 12 EXPENDITURES 12 13 Share of Jdm WoMe M 40 1,785,000 I,872,000 2,059.000 2,265,000 2,492.000 10A73.000 15,736.000 27.209,000 13 lA Cel..U..Bytom M A D ertl Other Opn. 758,000 )W.MO 8371000 879.000 923,000 4,195,000 5,362,000 9,547.000 IA 15 COP Samoa 197B4O00 2.293000 3878,000 3305E00 3463.000 13.91).500 1)A16.00(t 31233500 16 15 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4,632,000 4.982,000 6,774,000 04495W 0.8)9.000 39,S85,S00 39,,103.001) 87898500 1s 17 Ru.,..A Call..,le Next Y.er ),1)0,000 ).BBi,000 9.320,000 9,274,500 9.OSB,6oO 9p69,6O0 A253,500 8.253.600 17 18 Nen Year'.Dry Path!Furmirp Rthial.nb 2,261.000 2.881.000 2,887,000 3,225,000 3,439.000 3,139.000 4A37.000 6327,000 19 19. 20%Confl,.-Y Rau. 904,000 893,000 1,155,000 1290,000 1.375.000 1137.1. 1,731000 1731000 IB 20 Portion of Insurance Rasarve I,WS,OW "slox00 4,384,000 3J59,500 3,243,501) 3243.500 194,500 194,500 20 21 USER FEE DATA 22 Slnpa Prettily Fear!---War Fee 475.00 81B9.B8 4190.73 $207.53 $210A0 $204.04 22 23 Number 0l Ealate.nt Dere11bn9 Urde 26,533 26,633 26,783 26,933 27,083 27.033 23 24 E.U-IW War Fan of 1990.000 i6,05Q000 15,323.000 96,692.000 15.80Bp00 4)}49.026 24 100% Tax Diversion No Fee Adj. 1992-93 a' Fee Adj. 1993-90 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.a PMeM]IIIK] STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pepe 1 FISCAL YEARS 10921/93 THROUGH=1 =2 6 Year Torsi 6 Year TaMI LINE 111223 11e21/ IB24-26 I99626 108617 11121907 ISB)200] IU Year ToIW LINE I OPERATING FUND 1 1 Peeerne 6 C/rry Gore From Last Year 11,741,000 6011000 6,425,000 6 125 000 6 0]/000 0,741,000 3,514,000 0)11 000 3 3 REVENUE ] 1 Slve of l%To.ASmetlaR 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 / 6 Fen:IndI Wnle 176.000 201,000 231,000 360,000 300.000 1.1701000 2.]]6.000 3,661.000 6 6 Unr Fne 3,7e/,000 /,62e.000 4.011.000 6,087,000 6,317,000 32,601,000 36.6110,000 6],39),000 6 Intern L Meeellerreme 1-- 06.000 103.00o /62,000 411.000 314.000 2,121,000 700.000 3,82I.000 ] • Transfer Iran COP Fortes 3I.000 03.000 01,000 111,000 131.000 132,000 670,000 183,000 B • Other Reoerua 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 10 TOTALREVENUE 3/66000 6261000 6600000 6e116000 6138000 36335000 /3336000 5960)a00 la 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 10207000 11361000 13021" I3013000 11 ]0]000 330)]000 /0.0/0000 76/011000 11 IS EXPENDITURES 12 13 6Nre o1 JNm Warta M 6 O 3.6)]p0O 1..woero 3.96... 3.2.... 3,6/2,000 16,100000 1/,I37,000 31,3]).000 13 11 CoXeatlan Spbm M a O am Otter Oao. 301.000 3101000 332.000 341.00D 3e6.000 1,00/,000 2.120,000 3J0/.000 1/ 16 COP Samoa 1236000 1/11000 2.686,000 3324000 ])39000 13786000 1e6/6000 31 /40000 16 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1110000 1136000 6086a00 6930000 7008000 18668000 //882000 71/61000 16 17 Ruervn IF Car,Owrto Nnl Year 6,09),000 11./36,000 6,136,000 6,07/.000 3,614,000 3.614.000 1.167.000 I,e6).OW 17 1• Next Yeaie ON Petlof Fm4Yq RepuLxmnu 3,066,000 2A03,000 1,0/0.000 3.410.000 3,e//,000 3,e44,000 /,19I,000 1,151,000 Is IS 10%Contlrgamy Reserve 923000 /86 300 1,179,200 1 ]e)•00 1,537,600 1 63]6C0 1,995,200 1,996,200 11 30 Proton of Ineuunaa Ruarva 3.S30.Oo0 1.•)e e00 I BS)6C0 316 300 11,Be)0001 I1,Bq 0001 16030.2001 16,0]a 1001 20 31 USER FEE DATA 11 32 Slnpe Femlly Read—Wn Fee I56.00 0109.58 1111.01 $111A9 $1]/J] 1217.)) 23 23 Num6n of EWlvNenl Dwelllrrp UNa /I,830 /3.090 /2,110 43,090 /],I SO 43.S10 32 24 ENmnM Uao Text I3p111/,1000 11.628.000 64.111,000 16,001,1000 16,307.000 09,514.371 24 100% Tax Diversion No Fee Adj. 1992-93 n nAn._ul _ _al Fee Adj. 1993-94 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.) R.y%gVl 711192 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Peps 1 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 3001 2002 5 Y.el Toth 5 Y..,Tour! LINE 199293 199394 1894-85 199596 199697 19921997 19972002 IO Yur Toll LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 3 Pnervu N C.,,.Over From brt Yesr 13,799.000 131190.000 16,399 000 16,561 000 30.16gW0 13,799,000 21 630000 13,799,000 1 3 REVENUE 3 4 SOsrs of l%T..All—tion 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 1 6 F.—IMuntlN Wnu Bb,000 966,000 1.111.000 1,278,000 1,430.000 5,665,OM Ii'aos'" 1).0)0.000 5 5 U...F... 3,859.000 8.584,000 9]84.000 9.000,000 9.331,000 39,568000 61A90.0W 91,049,000 0 ) Im.—I&IN...IIm.ou.IMem. 951,000 1.041,000 1,230,000 1.366.000 1,471,000 6p59,000 8,134,000 15,193,000 ) 9 Tr.n.for from COP FuM. 10.000 134.000 168.000 191.000 199.000 830,000 970.000 1,790,000 9 9 OIM,PrvsIW. O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 10 TOTALPEVENUE 6907.000 10.715,000 11.2841. 11835,000 13371,000 52.112,000 72989,000 125,tO1000 10 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 1..?a... 23,905,OJ0 27S.2," 30,399003 33531000 as..I10M 04618000 139,800000 1t 12 EXPENDITURES 12 13 SH.r.of Joint Wok.M L O 2.798.000 2,933,000 ],236.. 3,549,000 3,904.000 10,41%. 16.I14,000 42,634.000 13 14 COII.Ud..SY.um M B O orl Otbr Op.r. 1,588.000 1.657,000 1,7E0,000 1.938.000 1.930.. 8,))3,000 11,189,000 19.07I,000 14 16 COY 6.Mc. 211301. 3,007000 4,042,000 1952,000 6,167,OW 18198.0"D 26,936,000 4603300O 16 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 8,616.000 ),60).000 9,018000 10339,000 11,001,000 44391000 6330000 107638,000 16 17 Re..—.i GltY..,tO No.Yur 13,190,000 16,398.000 18,584,000 30,160,003 31.530,000 21,630,0010 31,373.000 31,373,000 17 IB N.n Y..i.D,P.tlM FuMIn9 R.pul—m. 3,258,00r) 3,804,000 4,50e,00D 5,I20.000 5.501.000 6.501,000 0,959p00 6,959,000 19 18 20%C.mJrr, .,R.urv. 1 303.000 11521 000 1.804,000 2,048.0040 3,300000 1.200,000 27113,W0 21783o000 19 20 Portion of lmur.no.Re..rn 8,039,000 10,9)3,000 12,251,OOD 13,993.W0 13,929,000 13.9T9.000 31.b30.000 31,530.000 10 31 USER FEE DATA 21 23 SLgle Frail,R-rd-oe U.e.Fe. 940.00 $86.33 187.98 189.62 $91.19 $104.91 13 23 N...,of E4u1vMent D-110q UNt. 99,228 99,438 92,922 100,439 101.228 106,129 13 24 E. .m.U..,Fee. 13,969.0"1 1916B4,000 I9J84,00(1 19.000,000 19.331.000 111,039,469 14 i ( ( 1 100% Tax Diversion No Fee Adj. 1992-93 c V'sneaumajisses, Fee Adj. 1993-94 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.11 RM..7114M2 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH ROW Pa..I FISCAL YEARS 1192.1193 THROUGH 5001.1001 5 YMr TOW 5Val Toll LINE 1992 93 1093 14 I99486 1996118 1998 87 199297 19B7-2001 IO'Y..r Toll LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 1 R...m.S CwMOu.r Flan Last Year 12,240.000 10 AB8 0b 10 828 600 10,125.100 11,226,000 II 1.0000 8,209,01)(1 12,240,000 2 3 REVENUE 3 4 6Hm al l%Tax All-Non O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 F.ss:IMusW.I Waste 280.000 221.000 170,000 428.000 490.000 1.908.000 1.804.00a 5.881.000 6 6 Us.,Fs.. 2,056.000 510901000 6A70.000 7.114,000 717281000 10,522,000 52,171,000 B3,702.000 8 Iniw.w B M...0...Imam. 804.000 744,b0 710,000 6801000 611.000 2,670.000 3.017.000 6.587.000 ) 8 Transfer lmm COP Funds 06.000 120.000 165.000 174.000 101.000 701,000 bo000 Lb2,000 4 B Other Be.... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 10 TOTALREVENUE 4201500(t ]2)2000 ])26000 8408b0 8079000 106119000 80694000 97581.000 10 II TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 1Fees. 0 1))88000 I1264600 i8613500 18106000 4/1928000 89I0I00D 108823000 11 12 EXPENDITURES IS 13 6he,.aNtlnl Wave M 10 2.906.000 2,943,000 3,237,000 2,581.000 2.817.000 15.467,000 10A07,000 41.))4.000 13 14 COIbeOen 511.M 8 0 and Other Oper. BB6,000 BO8,000 9113,000 1,0011000 1,051,00o 4.))8,000 a,1o0,000 10.979.000 14 16 Cops.m.. 31)6000 ]18)600 4039000 4745600 6128000 164)6,000 26640000 46116000 16 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 6941000 7138600 11228000 9207600 10096000 40720000 58047000 68)6]000 16 17 Ru.—S Car,O—r..Next Year 10,406,000 10,019,600 10.115,500 9,110,000 0,208,000 8.101,000 11.0561000 11.056.000 17 Is Next YuM1 Or,Penh WMOp Re"ientents 2.976.000 1,508,000 4.115,0eo 4,054,000 5.048,000 5,041,000 0A901090 B,390,00oo is IB 20%ConllnB.mV R.P.m 1190'" 1428000 1640000 1962,000 2019,000 2018000 26511000 2558.000 is 20 P..'..Of lmunm.Rn.Iva 8.811.000 6623.6C0 4,]64,600 2J10000 11Q,000 1.N]OOo 1,110000 1110000 10 21 USER FEE DATA 11 21 Sinos1wllY RwM.m.User Fee Ib.CO II19.9a 6125.73 $137.58 4149.47 $230.01 22 11 Num6er of fWiv4nl Dwllhp Unit. 60.810 511110 51,480 51.010 52.160 63.910 12 24 E.tlmlea Us.r F... 13.055.00, 10,080,000 16,470,000 I7.I2S.000 1],]91.000 112,396.039 24 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFOBNIA IaBW ELLIS AVENUE - Jul 20, 1992 Po.BOX BIF) y FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFOANIA 82728.0127 nlm OS2.241 i AD HOC COMMITTEE RE FOUNTAIN VALLEY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ISSUE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RE RECOMMENDED AGREEMENT FOR SPECIFIC PLAN OF SITE USE AND DEVELOPMENT BETWEEN CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY AND COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS REGARDING RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 SUMMARY For some time the Committee has been discussing the issue of whether conditional use permits can be required by the City of Fountain Valley for expansion of treatment facilities at Plant No. 1. It is the position of the City that their zoning ordinance applies to the Districts and that its provisions requiring a conditional use permit can and should be enforced. The City believes it has the right and obligation to do so. It is the Districts' position that our treatment facilities are not subject to conditional use permits because we are a regional governmental authority providing sewerage service to all cities in metropolitan Orange County, thus transcending Fountain Valley's authority which, if enforced, could effectively usurp the land use decision making authority of the governing bodies of the other 22 cities and the County of Orange in the Districts' service area. To avoid litigation over the issue, the Districts and the City have been discussing how to best resolve the issue. At the September 1991 Executive Committee meeting the matter was referred to an Ad Hoc Committee. The Ad Hoc Committee presented an interim report to the Executive Committee in January 1992 at which time the Joint Chairman was authorized and directed to propose to the City of Fountain Valley that the City and Districts enter into an agreement setting forth a mutual understanding for utilizing a specific plan process pertaining to the site use and development at Reclamation Plant No. 1. The Committee, General Counsel and staff have been continuing to work with the City of Fountain Valley to resolve this issue and have recently concluded the negotiations successfully. The Ad Hoc Committee recommends approval of a proposed Agreement for Specific Plan of Site Use and Development Between the City of Fountain Valley and the County Sanitation Districts Regarding Reclamation Plant No. 1. BACKGROUND - RELATIONSHIP WITH FOUNTAIN VALLEY Treatment Plant No. 1 was originally constructed at its present site in the 1920's. In 1957 the City of Fountain Valley was incorporated and the Districts' Plant No. 1 is situated in the most southeasterly corner of the City' s boundary. During the past 35 years the Districts and the City of Fountain Valley have enjoyed an excellent and cooperative relationship. For example, the Districts AD HOC COMMITTEE REPORT Re Fountain Valley CUP Issue July 20, 1992 Page Two of Four have allowed the City to use the treatment plant site for police and fire department training, civil defense training and supplies storage, and other similar accommodations. These have all been done informally without the need for contractual arrangements. Recognizing the impact that operation of a sewage treatment facility could potentially have on the adjacent community, the Districts have always made a special attempt to be good Fountain Valley community neighbors. In 1983, for example, the Boards discontinued consideration of a waste-to-energy co-combustion facility at Plant No. 1 in response to concerns expressed by the City. Shortly after that the Boards approved the expenditure of millions of dollars in improvements at Plant No. 1 to construct facilities for odor and air emission controls and, further, declared a policy of enclosing all future facilities for odor control. Certain other mitigation measures have also been implemented. Extensive perimeter and interior landscaping to beautify and screen the plant (support buildings are also located to help screen the plant), architectural treatment of facilities and front entrance modifications to improve traffic safety and circulation along busy Ellis Avenue have either been accomplished or are underway. In addition, in 1986, in response to concerns expressed by the City over the potential extension of the Districts' service area boundaries which might trigger the need to further expand Plant No. 1 beyond what is currently envisioned, the Boards adopted a policy limiting service to those areas within the then adopted sphere of influence of the Districts and territory then served under contract. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ISSUE Over the years, although the Districts have regularly briefed the City on proposed treatment plant expansions and routinely submitted proposed plans for support buildings (administrative offices, laboratories, shops and warehouses) for review and approval , the Districts have never submitted plans for the treatment plant facilities for approval , nor has the City requested such submittals. However, in 1987 the City formally communicated with the Districts declaring their intent to require the Districts to apply for conditional use permits for construction and operation of all treatment facilities. It is the. position of the City that their zoning ordinance applies to the Districts and that its provisions requiring a Conditional Use Permit for the treatment plant can be enforced. The City believes it has the right and obligation to do so. It is the opinion of the Districts' General Counsel that the City of Fountain Valley does not have the authority to require conditional use permits of the Districts. He believes the City's zoning ordinances do not apply to the Districts because the legislature and the courts have determined that one municipality should not be able to defeat the exercise of power of another _ public agency; and that where a regional-type facility such as the Sanitation ' Districts' treatment plant (which provides the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal services on an exclusive basis for not only Fountain Valley but all of the other 22 communities in metropolitan Orange County) operates within the AD HOC COMMITTEE REPORT Re Fountain Valley CUP Issue July 20, 1992 Page Three of Four scope of the political authority of a larger "regional " governmental unit, the regional agency's rights are superior because its responsibilities transcend local municipal boundaries. Otherwise, if the City chose to use its zoning powers to control facilities improvements and extensions at Plant No. 1 it could, in effect, preclude potential development or redevelopment of the other cities and the unincorporated County territory within the Districts' boundaries or spheres of influence, thus effectively usurping the land use decision making authority of the governing bodies of the other 22 cities and the County. When the issue first arose in 1987, the Boards directed the Joint Chairman to communicate with the City's representatives to try and work out a satisfactory solution. Meetings were held and it appeared as if the issue had been resolved. However, in November 1990, the issue surfaced again. AD HOC COMMITTEE In 1991 the matter was the subject of ongoing discussions by the Executive Committee and between officials of the Districts and the City. At the September meeting it was referred to an Ad Hoc Committee comprised of Joint Chairman Mahoney and Past Joint Chairmen Catlin and Griffin to attempt to work out a mutually satisfactory resolution of the dispute with the City. The Committee has met numerous times including meetings with officials of the City of Fountain Valley. In January, the Committee submitted an interim report to the Executive Committee at which time the Joint Chairman was authorized and directed to propose to the City that the City and Districts enter into an agreement setting forth a mutual understanding for utilizing a specific plan process pertaining to the site use and development at Reclamation Plant No. 1, to resolve the dispute with the City and hopefully avoid litigation over the issue. RECOMMENDATION Since January the Executive Committee, General Counsel and staff have continued to work with the City of Fountain Valley and have recently and successfully concluded negotiations for what the Committee believes is a mutually satisfactory agreement to resolve the matter. Enclosed is a copy of the draft agreement (buff) between the City and the Districts providing for the use of the Specific Plan process to resolve the dispute concerning the applicability of the City's conditional use permit code to the Districts' Reclamation Plant No. 1. Also enclosed is a Summary of Agreement for Specific Plan of Site Use and Development Between City of Fountain Valley and County Sanitation Districts (ivory), prepared by General Counsel , that describes each of the provisions of the proposed agreement. Finally, a copy of the anticipated provisions of a resolution that the City will adopt approving the Specific Plan (gold) is also enclosed. i• AD HOC COMMITTEE , Re Fountain Valley CUP Issue July 20, 1992 Page Four of Four The Committee recommends approval of the enclosed Agreement for Specific Plan of Site Use and Development Between City of Fountain Valley and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, Regarding Sanitation Districts' Reclamation Plant No. 1. Respectfully submitted, AD HOC COMMITTEE RE FOUNTAIN VALLEY C.U.P. ISSUE William D. Mahoney, Joint Chairman A. B. Catlin, Past Joint Chairman Don R. Griffin, Past Joint Chairman Enclosures i AGREEMENT FOR SPECIFIC PLAN OF SITE USE AND DEVELOPMENT BETWEEN CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY AND COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, REGARDING SANITATION DISTRICTS' RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into, to be effective this day of , 1992, by and between: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 , 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, a political subdivision of the State of California, formed and existing pursuant to the County Sanitation District Act, California Health and Safety Code Section 4700 et seq. , hereinafter individually referred to as "District", and collectively as "Districts" ; AND CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY, a municipal corporation and general law city, hereinafter referred to as "City" . R E C I T A L S: A. WHEREAS, City is a general law city empowered with regulatory authority and control over land use of properties located within its jurisdictional boundaries. Said regulatory authority includes building and safety and zoning authority, as prescribed by state law and city-enacted ordinances; and B. WHEREAS, Districts, and each of them, are independent special districts and political subdivisions of the State of California, organized and existing pursuant to the provisions of the County Sanitation District Act, California Health and Safety 1 Code Section 4700 et seq. ; and C. WHEREAS, Districts jointly own and operate the Reclamation Plant No. 1 facilities in Fountain Valley, pursuant to the terms and conditions of that certain Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement by and among Districts, effective July 1, 1985; and certain regulatory permits as described below; and D. WHEREAS, Districts' Reclamation Plant No. 1 has been operated since 1923 as a Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant to provide treatment and reuse or disposal of wastewater, and presently provides service to over 2, 100, 000 persons in 24 communities and areas within the County of Orange, governed by 20 incorporated cities, including, specifically, City, 3 sanitary districts, a California water district, and the County of Orange; and E. WHEREAS, Districts' operation of Reclamation Plant No. 1 is regulated by the provisions contained in the Federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. Section 2351 at seg. ) ; the California Porter-Cologne water Quality Act (Water Code Section 13000 et seq. ) ; the California Ocean Plan (California Water Code Section 13000 at seq. ) ; and the California Resources Act (Health and Safety Code Section 40000 at seq. ) ; and F. WHEREAS, Districts must secure and in fact have obtained permits for construction and operation of all of the wastewater treatment and disposal facilities located at Reclamation Plant No. 1, said required permits having been issued for the regional service of Districts by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 ("EPA") ; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Santa Ana Region; the State Water Resources Control Board; and the South Coast Air Quality Management District; and G. WHEREAS, Districts developed and adopted their Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan dated February, 1989 (hereinafter "Districts' Master Plan" or "Master Plan") ; including, specifically, all facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, and submitted said Plan, prior to adoption, to City pursuant to Government Code Section 65403 for determination of conformity with City's General Plan; and H. WHEREAS, City reviewed said Districts' Master Plan and adopted a finding that it was in conformance with the General Plan of City; and I. WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on August 9, 1989, Districts made a determination that the capital �../ improvements/facility program for Reclamation Plant No. 1 of the Districts' Master Plan, would be in conformity with the General Plan of City; and J. WHEREAS, the City of Fountain Valley is a "Responsible Agency" , as that term is defined in the California Environmental . Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21069) with respect to major construction projects within its boundaries and does desire to offer its early comments on any District project that may have a significant effect on the environment; and K. WHEREAS, City was designated as a Responsible Agency in 1989, when Districts prepared a comprehensive draft Environmental 3 Impact Report ("EIR") , with City acting as a responsible agency, and thereafter Districts adopted Resolution Nos. 89-101 and 89-102, certifying the Final Program EIR for the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan; and L. WHEREAS, Government Code Sections 53090-53096, inclusive, contain provisions relating to the regulation of local agencies, counties and cities with respect to building and zoning ordinances; and M. WHEREAS, Government Code Section 53091 provides that each local agency shall comply with all applicable building ordinances and zoning ordinances of the city in which it is located, except that building ordinances of a city shall not apply to the location or construction of facilities for the production, generation, storage or transmission of water or wastewater by the local agency; and N. WHEREAS, City has adopted zoning laws codified as Title 21 of the Fountain Valley Municipal Code, and has, by ordinance, designated that Districts' treatment plant facility located within its municipal boundaries to be in the "M-1 Manufacturing District" ; and O. WHEREAS, Fountain Valley Municipal Code Chapter 21.40 describes the M-1 Manufacturing District and provides that "sewage treatment and disposal plants" are subject to the conditional use permit requirements of the Code; and P. WHEREAS, Districts contend that in providing the regional wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities for the 24 4 communities within their service area, they are not governed by or are otherwise exempt from the provisions of City zoning ordinances; \/ and Q. WHEREAS, a dispute has therefore arisen between City and Districts, in that City asserts that Districts must comply with certain use permit and other requirements under Title 21 of the City zoning ordinance for the Reclamation Plant No. 1 site; and R. WHEREAS, the parties hereto have determined that it is in the best interests of each party to resolve the dispute regarding legal rights and responsibilities of each party without extensive litigation; and S. WHEREAS, the parties desire to provide a system of land use review that will protect the interests of the Fountain Valley community without requiring City and Districts to waive their asserted legal rights described in these Recitals; and T. WHEREAS, to resolve said dispute, City p , y has proposed a Specific Plan process, as provided in Government Code Section 65450 at seq. ; and U. WHEREAS, to resolve said dispute, Districts agree to utilize said specific Plan process on a cooperative basis. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1 : Incorporation of Recitals by Reference. Fah cP the Recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein by reference as substantive provisions hereof. 5 Section 2: Authorized Uses. Districts agree to submit to city, for review and approval, an application for a Specific Plan of use and development of Districts' Reclamation Plant No. 1. The Specific Plan application submittal shall be the Districts' Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan (February, 1989) , previously found by City and Districts to be in conformance with City's general plan. In addition to those elements required by Government Code Section 65451, the Specific Plan shall specify the uses that shall be permitted on the site. Permitted uses shall include: a) all existing uses on the site of Reclamation Plant No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as the "Site") ; b) the proposed future uses that are identified in the Specific Plan; and c) comparable uses, or accessory and incidental uses to the existing and future uses, provided that there is no significant adverse environmental effect on the City of Fountain Valley for those comparable, accessory or incidental uses not specifically mentioned or reasonably inferred from the Specific Plan. By way of example, and not by way of limitation, a comparable use or a normally accessory or incidental use not specifically mentioned in the Specific Plan that would not have a significant effect on the City, would include such uses, the adverse environmental effects of which are limited to the Site, to any area outside the City limits, or to the Pacific Ocean. 6 Section 3 : Specific Plan - Non-Authorized Uses. Uses- .� that are not: (a) an existing use on the Site; (b) a future use specifically identified in the Specific Plan; (c) a comparable use, or (d) an accessory and incidental use to a use identified in (a) (b) or (c) above, (provided that there are no significant adverse effects) , shall not be permitted unless the District obtains a Specific Plan amendment authorizing such use. Section 4 : Permitted Uses - Intention of the Parties. It is the intention of the parties that uses that are identified in this Agreement as permitted shall have a status equal to a permitted use under the city's zoning ordinances, with no further discretionary approval required for the use itself. Section 5: Design Review. Notwithstanding the permitted nature of any use authorized by this Agreement or the Specific Plan, city shall have the right to have discretionary review authority over design features of the structures and related site. Such design review may include landscaping, screening, spacing, height considerations, building materials on exteriors visible from outside the Site, parking, traffic and access considerations, lighting as such lighting may be visible from off the Site or as it may relate to security, and law enforcement planning and design 7 considerations. Such design review shall not unreasonably impose conditions on District that would effectively prohibit District's permitted use. City shall not impose conditions related to matters not within its land use and police power authority. City agrees that it will not impose design standards on District that it would not impose on an industrial user of a similar nature within the City, and further agrees that its emphasis shall be focused on impacts that can cause effects on City residents outside the Site. By way of example and not by way of limitation, City shall not be concerned with the aesthetic appearance of buildings that cannot be seen from outside the Site. Section 6: Building Permits. Administration buildings, including but not limited to those that are predominately office buildings, including computer rooms, laboratories, warehouses, motor vehicle garages or depots, and engineering areas, shall require a building permit and any related construction permits, such as electrical and plumbing permits. Wastewater treatment facilities including but not limited to, digesters, clarifiers, scrubbers, and settling ponds shall be exempt from the City's building ordinances, as provided in Government Code Section 53091. Section 7 : Good Faith Efforts in Implementation. The parties agree to use good faith in processing the Specific Plan, in resolving disputes interpreting this Agreement or the Specific Plan or any amendment thereto, and in the application and review processes involved in design review and obtaining construction permits. 8 Section 8 : Approvals. The Specific Plan application shall only be submitted to the City Council of City for its review and approval if the authorized representatives of both parties approve of the Specific Plan and any conditions of approval thereto, prior to its submittal to the City Council. Any changes, amendments or revisions to the Specific Plan as recommended to the City Council, shall also be approved by District and City representatives prior to the adoption by the City Council. The Specific Plan, as adopted by the City Council, shall be in a form approved by the District. The City reserves to itself the right to terminate the application process, and District reserves to itself the right to withdraw the application for approval of the Specific Plan at any time prior to the adoption by the City Council. Upon adoption of the Specific Plan by the City Council, in a form approved by the District, City shall amend its zoning ordinance so that District is no longer subject to the conditional use permit requirements of said ordinance. Section 9: Offer to Compromise of No Effect. The parties agree that this Agreement represents an offer to compromise a zoning dispute between the parties and that the fact that either party has agreed to this Agreement or has participated in any negotiations leading up to the adoption of this Agreement shall not be admissible as evidence pursuant to Evidence Code Section 1152 of the validity of any legal position asserted. Each party reserves its legal rights and contentions in the event this Agreement is rescinded or the Specific Plan is not adopted. 9 This Agreement shall be binding on any successors-in-interest to the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. "CITY" CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY, a municipal corporation By Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Alan R. Burns, City Attorney "DISTRICTS" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California By Chairman, Board of Directors By Secretary, Board of Directors APPROVED AS TO FORM: THOMAS L. WOODRUFF DISTRICT COUNSEL By n w:VI(Ut9.) 07/20/92 10 ,ouncc a weeecu11 OXA"O[. u SUMMARY OF AGREEMENT FOR SPECIFIC PLAN OF SITE USE AND DEVELOPMENT BETWEEN CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY AND COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ...r RECITALS Paragraphs A through U, inclusive are the same Recitals that have been contained in the last six or eight drafts, without further revision, and have been reviewed and approved by the _ Districts. SECTION 2 This Section requires us to submit an Application for Specific Plan, which will be our 1989 Master Plan (112020 Vision") . However, it will only include Volume 2, Parts 1, 2 and 3 . The remaining Volumes 3 through 8, inclusive, plus Volume 1 - Summary, were deemed to be irrelevant to the City's issues, and therefore, to reduce size, only Volume 2 will be part of our Application to the City. All existing uses on the Plant 1 site are deemed to be permitted uses, as are the proposed future uses shown in the Specific Plan, together with comparable, accessory and incidental uses. The City's Resolution specifically adopts and approves that. SECTION 3 This Section identifies nonauthorized uses. This is stated in very general terms, but would simply address those which are not otherwise identified as either an existing or a future use in our Specific Plan. The idea would be that such things as "incineration" , "co-combustion", or "solid waste handling" are not identified in the Plan and therefore would not be authorized. However, those are not contemplated uses of the Districts in any event. SECTION-A This Section is designed to give the Districts' General Plan uses equal status with everything else in the City. SECTION 5 In this Section, the City gets some discretionary review over design features, but the development review provisions proposed to be included in the city's Resolution approving the Specific Plan, limits it to the nonwastewater facilities. SECTION 6 In this Section, the nonwastewater treatment facilities will be subject to Building and Fire Department review and permits. Page 1 0£ 2 SECTION 7 This Section is simply a statement that both parties will continue to use their best faith efforts to make this a satisfactory working agreement. SECTION 8 This Section has now been approved by the City Attorney and Staff in accordance with the language which I prepared in furtherance of expressions of concerns by your Committee. The actual Specific Plan Application will reach the City Council only if the representatives of both the City and the Districts agree as to the Resolution setting forth conditions of approval. Further, • if any amendments or revisions are developed by the Council at the time of the hearing, they must be approved by the Districts prior to final adoption. We reserve the right to withdraw the Application at any time prior to final adoption. This Section also says that upon adoption of the Specific Plan, the City is going to repeal its Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 9 This Section is boilerplate legal language, wherein it is an expression of the intent of the parties in entering into the Agreement and that each party reserves its legal rights. Page 2 of 2 SPECIFIC PLAN Authorized Scope of Development ...i The Specific Plan shall be based on the Districts' Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Waste Plan (February, 1989) , Volume 2, Parts 1-3 (hereinafter referred to as 112020 Plan") , as adopted by the Districts on July 19, 1989, and as graphically illustrated in the Site Plan submitted as part of that document, which is attached hereto and shall be a keystone of the Specific Plan. CIRCULATION The "2020 Plan" level of development intensity can be adequately supported by the vicinity's existing circulation system. Since traffic conditions and traveler characteristics may change in the future, this Plan allows for increased levels of development in the project. BUILDING HEIGHTS All facilities, buildings and structures shall be limited to fifty- five (551 ) feet in height without express Planning Commission development review approval. PERMITTED USES The uses as listed in the "2020 Plan" are incorporated by reference �./ as the permitted uses on the site. The District may request modification to those uses by way of an amendment to this Specific Plan. SITE PLAN The Site Development Plan attached hereto and approved by the County Sanitation Districts as a part of the 112020 Plan" is adopted as the City of Fountain Valley's official development plan for the Specific Plan. BUILDING/FIRE DEPARTMENT PERMITS All nonwastewater treatment facilities and structures shall be submitted to the City of Fountain Valley Building and Fire Departments for plan review and permits, including associated fees prior to the start of construction for said structures. Building and Fire inspections by City of Fountain Valley personnel shall be requested in conformance with the State Building Standards Code and Uniform Fire Code, where applicable. Page 1 of 2 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW All nonwastewater facilities which may be visible from outside the site shall be subject to the Development Review Process for quality of design, appropriateness and appearance, as provided for in Chapter 21.42 of the Fountain Valley Municipal Code or any successor law regulating the aesthetics of buildings and structures. The entire site shall also be described in a Precise Plan of Design setting forth lot dimensions, location, size and height of proposed nonwastewater buildings and structures, yards and set backs, walls, internal circulation, lighting or landscaping and signs, as described in Chapter 21.48 of the Fountain Valley Municipal Code or any successor law. Such requirements shall not be greater than imposed on any other permitted user in the M-1 Zone. Notwithstanding anything in the above-referenced Chapters to the contrary, the processing of a precise plan or development review proposal shall not require a public hearing, and review may occur at any regularly-scheduled Planning Commission Meeting. OTHER MATTERS REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65451 With respect to any other matter required by Government Code Section 65451, those may be identified directly on the Site Plan that is an attachment to this Specific Plan. Page 2 of 2 MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanllalion Districts P.O. Box 8127•10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County, California Fountain Valley,CA 92728$127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 JOINT BOARDS MEETING DATE August 12, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material sumnarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting. ALL DISTRICTS 9(a): AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE SAFETY AND TRAFFIC EQUIPMENT, SPECIFICATION ..i NO. . New regulations Imposed by the State of California, Department of Transportation (CALTRANS) , require upgrading of the Districts' traffic control safety equipment. The Collections Facilities Division of the Maintenance Department uses this equipment for establishing warning areas, transition zones, and work zones for day and night work in public streets throughout metropolitan Orange County. The Division operates in-roadways under the jurisdiction of CALTRANS, County of Orange and member cities within the Districts in the daily maintenance of our approximately 825 miles of sewer lines and multiple pump and metering stations. The traffic control set-up for each particular location may vary depending on posted speed limit, visibility, terrain, type and duration of work being performed and different requirements of the local authorities. CALTRANS has established standards which cover both the arrangement of the signs and markers and their sizes for ease of visibility and recognition by the motorist. The Districts' Collection Facilities Division meets all CALTRANS regulations at this time except for the recent changes to sizes and types of signs and markers. Specifications covering sign holders, flags, traffic cones, and other miscellaneous safety equipment were developed. The specifications were developed around commercially available equipment. Firms engaged in the supply of these items were given the opportunity to review and comment on the "draft" specifications as staff sought not to develop specifications based on a proprietary design. During the specification development period, the Purchasing August 12, 1992 ' Division contacted the State of California and CALTRANS to see if a State contracts or procedures existed similar to the mechanism used to allow local agencies to purchase vehicles. The contract for purchase of traffic signs may only be used by CALTRANS and is not available to any other entity. Bid packages were mailed to five expected bidders as well as advertised. On May 12, 1992 bids were opened. Only one responsive bid was received. That bid was from J. G. Tucker 8 Son, Inc. in the amount of $43,689.24. Another bid was responsive to only two items, traffic cones and sleeves. One "no bid" was received from another firm that had previously expressed interest in bidding. Staff has followed up with firms that did not respond. One firm, Western Highway, said that they had too many bids to respond to and did not have the time to submit on the Districts' request. One firm, Century Safety, was told by their manufacturer the bidding would be direct instead of through distribution. Another long-time supplier to the Districts, Continental Tool , who represents the same manufacturer, was given the identical information and requested to be left off the bidder's list. Staff therefore recommends that award for Purchase of Safety and Traffic Equipment, Specification No. E-216, be made to the only responsible bidder, J. G. Tucker and Son. Inc. , in the bid amount of $43,689.24, plus sales tax. 9(b): AWARD PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF FIBER OPTIC NETWORK BETWEEN NEW LABORATORY AND MAINTENANCE/OPERATIONS AND CONTROL CENTER, 6PECIFI ATION NO. M- 4 . In June 1991, the Boards adopted a computer automation master plan and approved the first phase of that plan to include the installation of a computer system and network for a Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) and a Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS). [See separate Agenda Item No. 11.] As the completion of the new Maintenance/Operations and Control Center building is near, it is necessary to install the fiber optic network for this system from the new Central Laboratory to the Maintenance/Operations and Control Center building. This extension will enable the staff in the new Maintenance/Operations and Control Center to utilize the CMMS as well as access the existing Local Area Networks in use throughout the Laboratory and Administration Building complex. In addition to the extension of the data network, this project will also provide a cable path for the telephone system into the new Maintenance/Operations and Control Center. This project will also include pulling the telephone cable through conduit throughout the new Maintenance/Operations and Control Center Building and wiring the telephone jacks. Sealed bids were opened July 14, 1992. Five bids were received ranging from a high of $85,898.00 to a low of $59,223.00. Staff recommends award of Specification No. M-040, Purchase and Installation of Fiber Optic Network Between New Laboratory and Maintenance/Operations and Control Center, to Sim J. Harris Company, San Diego, the lowest responsible bidder, for a total of $59,223.00, which includes labor, material and all applicable taxes. -2- August 12, 1992 9(c): AWARD PURCHASE OF ANIONIC POLYELECTROLYTE CHEMICAL POLYMER SPECIFICATION -1 Anionic polymer is used as a chemical coagulant, along with ferric v chloride, in the advanced primary treatment of wastewater. Advanced primary treatment enhances the treatment efficiency and controls hydrogen sulfide in the anaerobic digestion of sludge. Advanced primary treatment is a cost-effective means of removing solids and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) from the wastewater and, thus, aids in meeting the NPDES ocean discharge limits. It also reduces digester gas hydrogen sulfide levels. The current contract for supplying polymer is expiring and bids for a new contract have been solicited. Five chemical vendors were prequalified by laboratory testing. The polymer sample provided by the vendors for trial and prequalification must exactly match the respective polymer proposed by the bidders for use under the purchase contract specifications. Because the performance characteristics of each product differ, bid quantities of polymer to be supplied also differ and were specified for each vendor as determined by the lab testing. On June 30, 1992 three sealed bids were received and opened. The high bid was $307,769.00, and the low bid was $196,218.08 for annual usage of anionic polymer based on the above criteria. The estimated cost is $51,924.00 higher than the current contract. However, staff estimates the additional cost will be offset by the more efficient capture of the iron chemicals which are also used in this process and is fed with the anionic polymer. The iron chemical savings are estimated to be $75,703.00 per year, for a net savings of $23,779.00 annually. Staff recommends award to Diatec Environmental , the lowest responsible bidder, for the price of $0.039 per wet pound, plus applicable sales tax, for a one-year period commencing September 1, 1992, with provisions for four one-year extension periods upon mutually agreeable terms. (The estimated annual cost is $196,218.00.) 9(d): AWARD PURCHASE OF CAUSTIC SODA SOLUTION, SPECIFICATION NO. P-133. Caustic soda is a chemical used for treatment of malodorous air in the collection system and process of wastewater treatment at Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2. The treatment plant odor abatement program, which consists of 23 air scrubbing systems utilizing caustic soda at Plants 1 and 2, requires an estimated 1200 dry tons per year. The trunk sewer odor abatement program uses 2100 dry tons annually. The Boards have previously approved sharing the costs between the Joint Districts and District No. 3 for the trunk sewer odor abatement program because of benefits also derived at the Joint Treatment Works (50% to be paid by District No. 3 and 50% by the Joint Districts). Caustic soda is presently added to the District No. 3 Miller-Holder, La Palma and Knott trunk sewers and the Seal Beach trunk system. Sealed bids were opened on June 23, 1992, for the purchase of 3300 dry tons of caustic soda for a one-year period beginning September 1, 1992, with provision for four one-year extensions. Six bids and two "no bids" were �..i -3- August 12, 1992 ' received. The low bid was $271.88 per dry tone, including freight and superfund tax but excluding sales tax, and the high bid was $329.00 per dry ton. The low bid cost per dry ton represents a decrease of approximately 15% from the current year's contract, at $320.83 per dry ton, with Western States Chemical - Supply Corp., which expires August 31, 1992. Based on approximate annual usage of 3300 dry tons, the estimated cost is $897,204.00, plus applicable sales tax. Staff recommends award of a contract to Western States Chemical Supply Corp. , the lowest responsible bidder, for purchase of caustic soda for the unit price of $271.88 per dry ton, including freight and superfund tax, plus applicable sales tax, for a one-year period, with provision for four one-year extensions upon mutually agreeable terms. The annual costs are to be shared as follows: Treatment Trunk Plants Sewers Total Joint Districts $326,256 $285,474 $611,730 District 3 Only -0- 285,474 285,474 $326,256 $570,948 $897,204 9(e): AWARD CONTRACT FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SLUDGE, SPECIFICATION NO. 5-065. To comply with our NPDES ocean discharge permit, issued by U.S. EPA and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, and sludge reuse regulations, the Districts are required to monitor our sludge for specific chemical constituents. Analysis of several of these parameters require special certification or advanced instrumentation that the Districts' Laboratory does not possess. For this reason, the services of a contract laboratory with the necessary expertise and specialized instrumentation was solicited. The companies were requested to bid on the annual costs for a series of analyses, quality assurance costs, and courier delivery service fees. Bids were sought from fifteen laboratories with seven responding. Of these seven bids, three must be rejected because they did not meet the specifications, either because they were only partial bids or could not meet stipulated analytical methods. TBD Laboratories and BC Analytical did not bid on all items and are therefore considered non-responsive. C.L. Technology is not able to comply with the specified detection limits and required method of analysis for several of the compounds. The four remaining and qualified bids ranged from a low of $30,750.00 to a high of $41,637.00. A review of MacDonald-Stephens Laboratories, Inc., the lowest responsible bidder meeting all bid specifications, analytical capabilities and an inspection of their facilities indicates that they are capable of adequately meeting the contract requirements. -4- August 12, 1992 Staff therefore recommends that the bids of TBD Laboratories, C.L. Technology and BC Analytical be rejected for not meeting the bid specifications; and that MacDonald-Stephens Laboratories, Inc., of Laguna Hills, be awarded the Laboratory Services Contract for the Analysis of Sludge, Specification No. 5-065, for an amount not to exceed $30,750.00, for the period August 13, 1992 through June 30, 1993, with option for four one-year extensions upon mutually agreeable terms. 9(f): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 11 TO CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17. Job No. J-17, Central Laboratory, provides for the construction of a new laboratory, upgrading of the site paving, and provisions for additional parking at a cost of $8 million. Change Order No. 11 is an addition of $136,617.81 and 63 calendar days to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for two items of additional work. Item 1, in the amount of $60,960.33 and 63 calendar days, is for furnishing and installing telephone and computer communication cable within the new Central Laboratory. This communication cable was intentionally omitted from the original contract as it was intended to be supplied and installed separately by the Districts. When the laboratory was ready for occupancy, however, the work load of the Districts' Management Information Services Division was such that the work could not be completed in a timely manner, and it was necessary to have the contractor complete the work. Item 2, in the amount of $75,657.48, is the final adjustment of engineer's quantities for additional grading and gravel bedding. Upon completion of the initially-specified excavation, the Districts soils consultant found areas of the existing soils to be to unstable and required a two-foot deep over-excavation and placement of a rock blanket over those areas. The contract documents provide a fixed unit price for each one-foot depth of soil replaced with crushed rock and compacted in place. The above-described changes would.have been included to the original design if planned or known in the design phase. None of the items are for replaced work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 11 for an addition of $136,617.81 and 63 calendar days to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation. 9(g): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 TO PURCHASE ORDER NO. 37965 FOR PURCHASE F FUR WASTE DIGESTER GAS FLARES, JOB NO. J- 1A. The Directors have previously awarded Purchase Order No. 37965 to Sur-Lite Corporation for Purchase of Four Waste Digester Gas Flares, Job No. J-21A, in the amount of $246,960.00 plus tax, to comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) requirements. The flares are used to burn currently excess digester gas which is a by-product of the sewage treatment process. Change Order No. 3 deducts $8,223.00 for one item of deleted work and one item of reimbursement. -5- August 12, 1992 Item 1 is a deduction in the amount of $1,400.00 for deleted work associated with the electrical wire terminations for the four waste digester gas flares. Item 2 Is a credit in the amount of $6,823.00 for reimbursement to the u Districts for contractor delays which directly impacted other construction projects associated with the project. This item reflects a reimbursement for additional change order costs paid on the I-9 and J-21 contracts. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 3 to Purchase Order No. 32965 with Sur-Lite Corporation, providing for a net decrease in the amount of $8,223.00 which decreases the total purchase order amount from $246,960.00 to $238,737.00, plus tax. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 3 to Purchase Order No. 37965. 9(h): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 12 TO CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. J-1 -1. Job No. J-19-1, Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, is part of the $66 million master-planned Central Power Generation System which is being built under several contracts at both plants. This $15.8 million contract includes installation of three prepurchased digester gas burning, spark-ignited, 3472 horsepower engines with generators which are each capable of producing 2500 KW of electrical power. Change Order No. 12 is an addition of $51,966.00 to the contract for four items of additional work. Item 1, in the amount of $46,115.00, is for lighting system modifications required to correct errors and omissions in the plans and specifications. The consultant specified the incorrect amount of conductors for lighting control systems and incorrectly routed the number of wires �. required for lighting circuits. Modifications include increased conduit sizes, changed wiring, electrical contactor revisions, and additional junction boxes. Item 2, to the amount of $2,375.00, is for additional relays required to provide control signals to three Districts-supplied engine control center panels omitted from the contract documents. Item 3, in the amount of $1,493.00, is for signal cables to supply input to Districts-supplied vibration monitoring equipment in the engine control panels omitted from the contract documents. Item 4, in the amount of $1,983.00, is for added reinforcing steel and transition sections for round columns on the central power generation system building balcony as shown in the architectural drawings. Round columns were required to properly fit the handrail being installed on the balcony. The columns were shown to be square in the structural drawings and column schedules. Except for Item 4, the above described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. Item 4 included rework and the portion of the costs for the rework will be recovered from the designer. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 12 for an addition of $51,966.00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation. There is no time extension associated with this change order. -6- August 12, 1992 9(1): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NOS. 22 AND 23 TO GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. -1, AND ACCEPTANCE F CONTRACT A COMPLETE. Job No. P1-34-1, Gas Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Includes the construction of a new city water pump station, a new power building, and a new gas compressor building at a cost of $13.7 million. The contract also includes supplying and installing three reciprocating compressors at Plant No. 1, and supplying three reciprocating compressors at Plant No. 2. The contract is now complete. (1) Change Order No. 22 Change Order No. 22 is a net addition of $56,349.33 and adds 61 calendar days to the contract with Ziebarth 8 Alper for 12 items of added work and 2 items of deleted work. Item 1, in the amount of $2,296.00, is for the installation of a concrete curb required to properly seal the transformer oil containment basin adjacent to Power Building No. 5. Item 2, in the amount of $5,893.00, is for rerouting 6-inch stainless steel piping to supply high pressure digester gas to the new waste digester gas flare facilities for Plant No. 1 because of changes in scheduling of associated projects. Item 3, in the amount of $4,394.00, is to reroute and provide permanent supports for cable tray and electrical conduits in Intersection L, which was demolished, enlarged, and relocated in this contract. Item 4, in the amount of $5,605.00, is for installing digester gas vent lines from three gas compressors to the exterior of the gas compressor facility, not shown on the contract drawings, to prevent digester gas from ventilating inside the building. Item 5, in the amount of $1,486.00, is for installing a fiberglass grating cover on the low pressure gas holder tank drain box and an air gap in the drain piping inside the box. The cover is required for personnel safety and the air gap allows plant operators to know when all condensate has drained out of the gas holder. Item 6, a credit in the amount of $6,045.00, is for deleting two circuit breakers shown on the contract drawings at Power Building No. 5 which were determined to be unnecessary. Item 7, in the amount of $22,677.00, is for providing bus duct connections between an existing medium voltage switchgear lineup and proposed new medium voltage switchgear sections in Power Building 3A not shown on the plans. Item 8, in the amount of $15,477.00, 1s for providing three 10-inch butterfly valves on the high pressure digester gas system in the Gas Compressor Building. These additional valves are required to isolate heat exchangers and are not clearly shown in the contract documents. Item 9, in the amount of $5,679.00, is for providing ground fault protection for three gas compressor reduced voltage starters. Item 10, in the net amount of $3,545.00, is for providing a permanent cast in place concrete tunnel plug in Tunnel No. 3 in lieu of a temporary tunnel plug at the specified location. Item 11, in the amount �. -7- August 12, 1992 of $1,010.00, is for relocating crane stops for the bridge crane in the gas compressor facility to prevent potential damage to the access platform. Item 12, in the amount of $1,937.00, is for revising the pneumatic operator for the atmospheric vent valve to suit the actual vent valve service requirements. Item 13, in the amount of $894.00, is for revising the hand-off-automatic switching for the industrial water pumps to accommodate proper operations. Item 14, a credit for $8,498.67, is the deletion of spare electronic cards. Except for Items 7, 11 and 13, the above described changes would have been included in the original design phase. Items 7 and 11 include rework and that portion of the cost will be recovered from the designer. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 22 for a net addition of $56,349.33 and a 61 calendar day time extension to the contract with Ziebarth & Alper. (2) Change Order No. 23 Change Order No. 23 is a net deduction of $61,818.63 from the contract with Ziebarth & Alper for three items of deleted work and one no-cost change of contract provisions. Item 1, a deduction of $33,000.00, is to reimburse the Districts for costs required to assemble the three gas compressors delivered to Plant No. 2 onto skids. Contract documents require that the gas compressors be skid mounted and they were delivered to Plant No. 2 in separate components. Item 2, a deduction of $10,000.00, is a settlement of a dispute over spare parts requirements for gas compressor cylinder valves and bearings. The specifications are unclear regarding the number of valves and bearings required. Item 3, a deduction of $18,818.83, is a credit for spare field and control panel mounted instruments specified to be provided with the gas compressor controls which are unable to be supplied in a timely manner. Item 4, a no-cost item, assigns the credits in Items 1, 2 and 3 of this change order to the funds set aside for progress payments for the gas compressors and related controls as described in Change Order No. 2, Item 1. Change Order No. 2, Item 1 provided for joint progress payments to both the contractor and compressor manufacturer for manufacture and delivery of the gas compressors and related controls. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 23 for a net deduction of $61,818.63 from the contract with Ziebarth & Alper. There is no time extension associated with this change order. (3) Acceptance of Contract as Complete Ziebarth & Alper has fulfilled all contractual obligations within the specified and approved time extensions. Therefore, staff recommends adoption of the resolution attached to the agenda material , authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the Final Closeout Agreement and filing of the Notice of Completion as required. The final project cost is $13,689,820.70. -8- August 12, 1992 9(1) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 12 TO CONSTRUCTION OF DIGESTERS NOS. 11-16 AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 NO. PI-34-3 REHABILITATION DIGS TER AND 1U Al KLLLAMAliUN PLANI NU. 1 Mi NU. Pl-.Ib-Z' �--� INSTALLATION OF WASTE DILJE5TER GAS FLARE FACILITIES PLAT fID JOB NO. J- 1. This $27.8 million project includes the construction of new Digesters 11-16 (Job No. P1-34-3) , the rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 (Job No. PI-35-2) and the construction of new digester gas flare facilities at Plants 1 and 2 (Job No. J-21). Change Order No. 12 adds $10,336.00 for two items of additional work to Job No. P1-34-3. Item 1, in the amount of $5,884.00, provides for additional wiring to the electric motor/operator unit for the roll-up door in Digester 15-16 Pump Room. The wiring for this motor was not shown on the contract drawings. Item 2, in the amount of $4,452.00, provides for two modifications to the fiberglass ventilation duct installation, one to avoid conflict with another piece of equipment, and the second to provide a watertight seal at the roof penetrations. The above-described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase and are not for replaced work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 12 for an addition of $10,336.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. There is no time extension associated with this change order. 9(k) : APPROVE ADDENDUM NO. 8 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BROWN AND ALDWELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR CENTRAL POWER GENERATION Y TEM 8 NO. J-1 . The design engineering contract for Job No. J-19, the Central Power Generation Systems, was first awarded to Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers In July 1986. The original contract also provided support for initial project development and for securing a Permit to Construct from the South Coast Air Quality Management District. The Central Power Generation Systems, now under construction, will utilize the Districts' digester gas, a by-product of the sewage. treatment process, to fuel internal combustion engines which in turn will drive generators and produce power to operate the two treatment plants. When completed in 1992, the Districts will be essentially self-sufficient for power. Facilities contracts have been awarded for the $20 million manufacture and procurement of the eight large internal combustion engine-generating sets, the award of a $20 million construction contract at the Huntington Beach plant, and a $15 million construction contract at the Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant. Addendum No. 8 provides for added engineering inspection/review services plus new work for the project. As previously reported to the Boards, additional staff and consultant time has been required because the construction contractor is supplying Toshiba electrical equipment. This has entailed extra inspection and engineering efforts to ensure the equipment meets the specifications and intent of the electrical design. As part of recently approved change orders on three separate -9- August 12, 1992 ' Districts projects, Jobs Nos. P1-34-1, J-19-1 and J-19-2, $50,000 was credited to the Districts for added design and inspection charges associated with Toshiba equipment. Addendum No. 8 provides added time for this work. The second category deals with added work. The Central Power Generation project was planned and designed to operate "in parallel " with Southern California Edison (SCE). Under this design, the plants would receive power from SCE when demand exceeds generating capacity, and sell surplus power to SCE when available. There could be infrequent occurrences when Central Power Generation is suddenly called upon to power all of the equipment in the event of a large power demand and/or sudden loss of SCE power, either of which could damage the generating equipment. As a safety measure, staff recommends that automatic load shedding studies and facilities design be undertaken. Load shedding is a scheme wherein preselected loads are shut down to reduce the overall plant loads and resulting electrical demand. Load shedding is necessary to match the demand load with the generator output during a time when we lose our power from Southern California Edison. The generators must pick up the plant load anytime the utility main trips. Load shedding must be done faster than the engines can react to the increased load, or switches could manually be opened. Load shedding will only be required when the generators are operating in parallel with the SCE and we are purchasing power from the utility. Finally, during reconfiguration of the Electric Service Center required for the installation of the generation equipment and for installation of new SCE power supplies, it was discovered that additional modifications should be made, including removal of unused devices, replacement of improperly rated devices, and rewiring several areas in the switchgear to accommodate more effective operation and maintenance. The proposed work includes preparation of a project report detailing all the modifications and plans and specifications for the approved modifications, as well as providing construction support for the Installation, testing and start-up. As authorized by the Boards in April , the Selection Committee has negotiated Addendum No. 8 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell for the additional professional services on an hourly-rate basis including labor and overhead, plus direct expenses and fixed profit, for the additional contract amount of $292,024.00, as follows: Existing Change per Amended Agreement Addn. 8 Agreement Professional Services, (hourly rates including labor plus overhead at 175%) , not to exceed $3,229,314 $259,506 $3,488,820 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 398,107 20,670 418,777 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 162,700 -0- 162,700 Fixed ,Profit not to exceed 4,189:111 292,024 4,g00839 Total -30- August 12, 1992 The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above additional - work and adoption of a resolution approving Addendum No. 8 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the agenda supporting documents. 9(1): RECEIVE AND FILE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND APPROVE AGREEMENT WITH J. T. H RVATH & ASSOCIATES FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND IN PE TIN SERVICES. The current workload of managing the multiple, concurrent master-planned construction projects exceeds the staffing resources of the Districts' Construction Management Division. Accordingly, in October 1990, the Directors authorized a professional services agreement with J. T. Horvath & Associates to provide additional construction inspection services. Mr. Horvath has been assigned the construction management duties for the Control Center/Operations and Maintenance Building and the New Central Laboratory, both at Plant No. 1. Over the next several years it is anticipated that additional support facilities will be constructed, including the Operations Center Expansion and new Warehouse and Maintenance Buildings at Plant No. 2 and a new Personnel Building at Plant No. 1. Staff is therefore recommending that Mr. Horvath's agreement be extended three years to help manage these projects. The proposed agreement extension with Mr. Horvath is for a three-year period. Mr. Horvath will provide similar services on the Operations Center Expansion at Treatment Plant No. 2, which will begin in about September 1992 and extend through September 1993. The Warehouse and Maintenance Building projects ... at Plant No. 2 are scheduled to begin in the summer of 1993 and extend through 1995. The Selection Committee has negotiated an agreement with J. T. Horvath & Associates for a two-year period, on an as-needed basis, at the following rates: First year - $39.20 per hour beginning October 11, 1992, and Second Year - $40.95 per hour beginning October 11, 1993. The agreement contains provision for a third year at the rate of $42.80 if agreed to by both parties. The agreement includes reimbursement of direct expenses at cost and a two-week termination clause. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee certification of the negotiated hourly rates and adoption of a resolution approving the agreement with J. T. Horvath & Associates. Copies of the certification and the resolution are attached with the supporting agenda material. 9(m): APPROVE ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MARTIN KORDICK SR. RE CONSTRUCTION OF INTERPLANT PIPELINE AND UTILITY CORRIDOR, JOB NO. I-9. For the past five years, Mr. Martin Kordick has provided specialized construction management services. Mr. Kordick's current contract ends on -11- August 12, 1992 August 10, 1992. Staff believes it would be in the Districts' best interests to 'extend the contract through December 1992. Mr. Kordick is currently working on the $21 million Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor project, Job No. I-9, which Includes the construction of a 120-inch diameter wastewater line between Plants 1 and 2. This project needs close coordination with the County of Orange and the Corps of Engineers since It is being constructed within Districts' right-of-way on the westerly Santa Ana River levee. The have two large projects also under construction, as part of the improvements to the Santa Ana River flood control channel , both in the $40 million range. All of the projects impact each other. Mr. Kordick, who has over 50 years of experience as an underground construction contractor and inspector, is working between 30 and 35 hours per week at a rate of $42.50 per hour for hours worked. Staff recommends that the Directors adopt a resolution approving Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Martin Kordick, Sr. , extending the contract through December 31, 1992, which will allow the Districts to utilize Mr. Kordick's construction management services for most of the remaining work on the Interplant project. There is no change in the hourly rate. A copy of of the resolution is attached with the supporting agenda documents. 9(n): AUTHORIZE SELECTION COMMITTEE TO SOLICIT PROPOSALS AND NEGOTIATE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR REHABILITATION OF CLARIFIERS 3, 4 AND 5 AT PLANT NO. 1 JOB NO. P1- 1 AND REHABILITATION OF CLARIFIERS A THROUGH Q AT PLANT N . PZ-48. Rehabilitation and correction of deficiencies are needed on all older primary clarifiers at the two treatment plants and the time is right for accomplishing this work. As the Directors are aware, in the last couple of months 60 million gallons per day of new primary clarifier treatment facilities have been completed and placed in service at Reclamation Plant No. 1 (Job No. PS-33). The addition of this primary treatment capacity will now allow staff to take the older clarifiers, some of which date to 1954, out of service for the needed rehabilitation work described below. In 1987 and 1988, the Districts installed the most extensive odor control facilities in the western United States. Those facilities have been extremely successful , and have virtually eliminated odor complaints. Prior to the installation of the odor control dames and covers on the primary clarifiers, some maintenance and rehabilitation was done on the then existing twenty clarifiers. Included in this work was the coating of ferrous metal surfaces to protect them once the covers were Installed. This work was completed between 1984 and 1987. The needed rehabilitation includes improvements to nearly all facets of the primary clarifiers. The cost estimate is $10 million with the largest single item, seismic retrofit, estimated at $4 million. This work, concentrated on the 17 clarifiers at Plant No. 2, includes soils stabilization to prevent liquifaction during an earthquake. The Directors will recall that a contract -12- `/ August 12, 1992 for seismic investigation of facilities at both plants was awarded to Dames 8 Moore in October 1990. That study found soil stabilization to be the most cost effective and least disruptive way to upgrade the structural stability of the primary clarifiers to withstand major earthquakes. The center columns of the clarifiers include baffles which distribute the incoming raw wastewater evenly and assure slow velocities in the settling basins. These also need to be recoated or, alternatively, if economically feasible, replaced with lighter fiberglass baffles. (The fiberglass baffles would eliminate the need for future coating and reduce the weight which will aid in earthquake stability). The "beaches", which remove the scum, are also in need of repair and modification. Some of these are well over 25 years old. Also included in the project is the coating of various ferrous metal surfaces for which the original coatings are failing. Nearly all of the corrosion is minor to date; however, it is clear that the polyurethane coatings installed between 1984 and 1987 and additional coating applied when the domes were Installed will not last and that they need to be replaced. This work is estimated at $2,950,000. Various other miscellaneous ferrous appurtenances within the domes will need to be recoated or replaced with non-ferrous material. Accelerated distress and corrosion have been noticed in the dome supports at the point where they connect to the clarifiers. The supports must be rebuilt including more corrosion resistant provisions which will prevent further deterioration. Separately, counsel and an independent consultant are investigating whether or not the contractor or designer made errors in the original installation of the domes for which cost reimbursement could be sought. This portion of the project is estimated to cost about $500,000. The Directors may recall that about four years ago failures of certain underground concrete piping occurred. This pipe delivers the raw wastewater to the basins and removes the primary treated water from the basins. When originally installed, the concrete piping did not include a protective liner because it was not a standard procedure then. While the rehabilitation work is being done on the clarifiers, this project will include the installation of liners on pipes which have not suffered severe corrosion and/or the replacement of pipe with lined concrete pipe if corrosion is found to be severe. The pipes will be inspected as part of the design process to determine the exact condition and the necessaryy work will be included in the construction contract. This work Is estimated at $350,000. The work will also include replacement of worn valves and pumps, seventeen sulfide monitors, modification to scum collection equipment, and electrical system upgrades to meet the latest National Fire Protection Association recommendations. This cost is estimated at $2.2 million. Other work associated with the clarifiers already under design in separate miscellaneous improvements projects, including the seismic retrofit of mechanical systems, will be bid in the same construction contract. This work, already approved by the Directors, will be identified separately. The estimated cost of the rehabilitation work now recommended is summarized below: -13- August 12, 1992 Estimated Item Cost Earthquake retrofit $ 4,000,000 Rehabilitation of clarifier collectors, bridges and coatings 2,950,000 Dome support rehabilitation 500,000 Underground concrete pipe rehabilitation 350,000 Equipment replacement 1,300,000 Electrical upgrades 900,000 $10,000,000 Staff is recommending that the Selection Committee be authorized to solicit proposals and negotiate a professional services agreement for the work described above. Following the Selection Committee's negotiations, the agreement will be presented to the Directors for consideration. 9(o): 1992-93 SARFPA MEMBERSHIP. The Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency is made up of public agencies in the Santa Ana River flood plain. The purpose of the organization is to promote the improvement of flood protection facilities along the river, which parallels our two treatment plants. Because of our interest in protecting the two treatment plants from flood damage this is an important agency. Staff recommends our continued participation. The Districts' dues for 1992-93 are estimated to be $1,250. 9(p): 1992-93 SCAPOTW MEMBERSHIP. The Southern California Alliance of Publicly Owned Treatment Works (SCAPOTW) is an organization comprised of both cities and special districts engaged in providing sewerage services in the seven counties that make up Southern California. Its primary purpose is to prepare information and testimony and to present a unified position to state, regional and local regulatory authorities in support of factually and scientifically-based, technically-sound cost-effective regulatory requirements that balance the protection of the environment with the economic viability of our communities. The bottom line is to lobby for pragmatic regulations that make rational technical and/or economic sense, potentially saving POTWs millions of dollars; and, if necessary, to initiate legal action towards those ends. It is somewhat similar to an organization in Northern California called Bay Area Dischargers Association (BADA). Originally, the Southern California POTWs were asked to join with BADA in a state-wide organization. However, it was determined that there were significant enough differences in regulatory issues that separate groups would be more effective; although the two groups will form a coalition on selected issues when appropriate. -14- August 12, 1992 The SCAPOTW agenda includes air quality, water quality, toxics, reauthorization of the Clean Water Act, endangered species, spills, effluent limitations, sediment criteria, pretreatment enforcement, Ocean Plan, Inland Plans, sludge composting and disposal , use of reclaimed water, POTW monitoring, �..i fees imposed on POTWs and others. Staff recommends approval of membership for 1992-93. The estimated annual dues are $25,000. Your General Manager is on SCAPOTW's Board. DISTRICTS 2 AND 3 9(q): APPROVE TAX INCREMENT PASS-THROUGH WITH GARDEN GROVE FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. Use of tax increment financing by Redevelopment agencies to generate revenues for redevelopment projects freezes the District's (as well as the other taxing agencies' ) ad valorem tax revenues. The incremental tax revenues are then used by the Redevelopment Agency to service the debt incurred to finance the project. However, the redevelopment activities within each project area generally result in additional flow to the Districts' sewerage facilities, thus increasing the cost of sewerage service and the need for facility improvements, but without an attendant increase in Sanitation Districts' revenue to pay said costs. To address this problem, the Boards of Directors have previously adopted a policy (Resolution No. 82-110) of negotiating with Redevelopment Agencies for funding of Districts' services for redevelopment project areas, using a priority ranking of alternatives. The action appearing on the agenda is the consideration of a resolution approving a tax-increment pass-through agreement providing Districts Nos. 2 and 3 with 80% of its property tax revenues that would have historically been allocated to the Districts if it were not for the Redevelopment Agency financing mechanism. This agreement Is consistent with previously established Board policy and includes the same pass-through terms achieved for other recent and future redevelopment plan adoptions and amendments. The Plan Amendment would add certain territory to the Garden Grove Community Project, increase the debt and tax increment limitations of the project, and make other changes to the Plan. The proposed Districts 2 and 3 tax-increment pass-through agreements will return to Districts 2 and 3 a combined total of $20,857,111 in property tax revenues over the life of the Amendment. The property tax revenues retained by the Districts, by project area, are summarized as follows: Plan Dist. 2 Dist. 3 Districts' Project Area Duration Payment Payment Totals Garden Grove Community Project 2031-32 $11,716,517 $9,140,594 $20,857,111 -15- August 12, 1992 Under the terms of the Agreements, the Districts will annually provide to the Agency a written report describing and accounting for the expenditure of monies paid pursuant to this Agreement. Staff recommends approval of the pass-through agreement with the City of Garden Grove. DISTRICT 2 9(r): RECEIVE, FILE AND APPROVE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CHURCH ENGINEERING, INC. , FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES FOR REHABILITATION OF CYPRFS AVENUE SUBTRUNK SEWER, FROM IMPERIAL HIGHWAY WEST OF KRAEMER BOULEVARD TO THE INTERSECTION OF YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD AND ASSOCIATED ROAD CONTRACT 2-9-R1. The Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9, was completed in February 1961, from Yorba Linda Boulevard to Imperial Highway following the natural drainage pattern of the area. The pipe, installed in the low-lying area of the drainage course, is an 18-inch VCP in the lower reach, and is a 15-inch VCP in the upper reach. The original plans show little development adjacent to the pipe encasements at that time. Subsequent fill from encroaching development in lower-lying areas of the drainage course has caused overburden on the existing pipe and, as a result, the existing Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer is cracked and damaged. The line has required emergency repairs in two locations and maintenance capabilities are limited by both site development and lack of access easements. In October 1990, the Directors authorized Willdan Associates to prepare a project report to review the status of the line and make recommendations for the line's rehabilitation, replacement or relocation. The report has been completed and recommends that the District replace the existing 18-inch VCP with a new 21-inch VCP sewer in Associated Road from Yorba Linda Boulevard to Bastanchury Road and within Bastanchury Road from Associated Road to the Parkside Apartments. The report recommends relocating the existing 18-inch sewer within the apartment complex to relieve the excessive surcharge conditions and to connect to the Districts' existing 18-inch relief sewer constructed under the Orange Freeway per Contract No. 2-9-1. For the portion of the line between the Orange Freeway and Rolling Hills Drive, the report recommends rehabilitation of , the line by installation of an interior line or replacement of the 15-inch VCP in a new alignment which will require easements from the City of Fullerton. The line in the Imperial Golf Course between Rolling Hills Drive and Imperial Highway will be relocated with future development plans. The report estimates the cost of the rehabilitation and replacements to be $1,140,000.00. In March the Directors authorized the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate a Professional Services Agreement. Proposals were solicited from five firms. The Selection Committee has reviewed the proposals and negotiated a professional services agreement with Church Engineering, Inc. for preparation of plans and specifications and construction support services for an amount not to exceed $119,524.00, based on hourly rates plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants fees, and fixed profit. -16- � August 12, 1992 The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and f1le the Selection Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and adoption of a resolution approving the Professional Services Agreement with Church Engineering, Inc. Copies of the certification and resolution are v attached with the supporting agenda documents. DISTRICTS 5 AND 6 9(s): APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS RE IMPROVEMENTS TO BITTER POINT AND ROCKY POINT PUMP STATIONS, CONTRACTNO. 5-32, AND IMPROVEMENTSTO BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION ONTRA NU. b-JJ. In April and May of 1988, the Directors awarded professional services agreements to Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates for Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-31, and Improvements to Bitter Point and Rocky Point Pump Stations, Contract No. 5-32; and Improvements to Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33, and Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-34. (A series of construction contracts have been awarded for construction of the trunk sewer facilities under Contracts Nos. 5-34-1, 5-34-2 and 5-34-3.) It is proposed to combine the designs for the two pump station projects into one construction contract because of the similarity of design and efficiency of combined bids. Contract No. 5-32 is for improvements and upgrading of the electrical and mechanical systems for reliability purposes of both Bitter Point and Rocky Point Pump Stations, both constructed in 1936. Contract No. 5-33 will replace pumps and provide major structural , architectural , electrical and mechanical upgrades for the Bay Bridge Pump Station, built in 1966, which pumps all wastewater from south of the Upper Newport Bay crossing. Staff recommends approval of plans and specifications and authorization for the General Manager to establish the bid date for Contracts Nos. 5-32 and 5-33. The bid date is tentatively set for September 15, 1992. The engineer's estimate for this work is $1.85 million. DISTRICT 5 9(t): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 TO IMPROVEMENTS TO BAYSIDE DRIVE TRUNK SEWER - PHASE 3, CONTRACT NO. 5- 4-3. This $4.1 million project within the City of Newport Beach includes the construction of a new sewer line in Pacific Coast Highway through Corona del Mar. Portions within the Corona del Mar commercial area are being constructed using tunneling techniques as will portions near the southerly City of Newport Beach boundary where excavations are deep. Also included in this contract is the repair of the Big Canyon Trunk Sewer near Jamboree Road and the relocation of several sewer laterals installed by the City of Newport Beach to the Sanitation District's old sewer line, thereby allowing abandonment of the old line. Finally, a new median in Pacific Coast Highway southerly of Hazel Drive will be included. Change Order No. 4 adds $104,000.00 to the contract for payment of the Phase I bonus for early completion. -17- August 12, 1992 ' The Contract Special Provisions and Detailed Specifications provide a bonus/penalty clause for early/late completion of the first tunnel section and open cut sections through the Corona del Mar commercial area. The purpose of this clause is to provide an incentive to complete the work on-time or early to minimize disruption to the businesses and the motoring public. The bonus/penalty for each calendar day is $2,000.00. The contractor accomplished this work 52 calendar days early including allowances for delays for bad weather and slow down for undisclosed rock that was encountered, and is therefore entitled to this bonus payment. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 4 for an addition of $104,000.00 to the contract with Silveri 8 Le Bouef. There is no time extension associated with this change order. DISTRICT 7 9(u): AWARD ABANDONMENT OF PORTION OF MACARTHUR TRUNK SEWER WITHIN JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT, CONTRACT NO. 7-18-1. In September 1986 the County of Orange and County Sanitation District No. 7 (CSO 7) of Orange County entered into an agreement under which the County granted an easement to CSD 7 for construction and operation of a sewer pipeline and appurtenances on the property of the John Wayne Airport. CSD 7 agreed, as partial consideration for the easement, to abandon that portion of the MacArthur Trunk Sewer pipeline located under the airport runways and to fill all voids of the pipeline with cement slurry once new alternate sewers were in place and all older buildings at the airport were reconnected. Recently, the airport notified CSD 7 that the airport has discontinued its use of said pipeline and it may now be abandoned. Plans and specifications for the abandonment were prepared by staff and on July 20, 1992, five bids were received for this project. The bids ranged from a high of $94,650.00 to a low of $62,000.00, submitted by Colich 8 Sons. The recommended action appearing on the agenda is to award the contract to Colich 8 Sons of Gardena, for their low bid amount of $62,000.00. g(v): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO IRVINE-NEWPORT SUBTRUNK RELIEF SEWER CONTRACT NO. 7-3E-2 AND ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT AS COMPLETE. This project, within the City of Tustin, consists of the construction of approximately 1,060 feet of 15-inch vitrified clay pipe (VCP) sewer and manholes to relieve a surcharge problem along Newport Avenue between new Irvine Boulevard and a point approximately 420 feet north of old Irvine Boulevard. The contract is now complete. (1) Change Order No. 1 Change Order No. 1 adds $92,407.00 and 37 calendar days to the contract for seven items of additional work. -18- August 12, 1992 Item 1, adding $58,064.00 and 34 calendar days, results from the discovery of telephone ducts at a different elevation than indicated in the contract documents. The telephone ducts required a redesign of the new sewer line, changing the profile as well as the points of connection. An additional 180 feet of new 15-inch sewer line was required, as well as additional potholing, slurry backfill , demolition and replacement of asphalt paving, and tunneling under and supporting three 48-inch CMP storm drain lines. Item 2, in the amount of $1,289.00, is for added work in crossing a second undisclosed telephone duct during the excavation for the new sewer line. Item 3, in the amount of $1,205.00, reimburses the Contractor for additional work associated with an undisclosed 6-inch sewer lateral discovered during the excavation for the new sewer line. Item 4, in the amount of $1,309.00, is for added work for an unknown and undisclosed 12-inch steel pipeline during excavation for the new sewer line. Item 5, adding $6,134.00 and one calendar day, is for costs to connect an undisclosed sewer lateral to the new sewer line. Item 6, adding $10,156.00 and two calendar days, is for connecting an undisclosed 6-inch sewer lateral and relocating an undisclosed 1-inch water line at the location of one of the new manholes. Item 7, provides for a bonus payment in the amount of $14,250.00. The contract provides a bonus of $250.00 per day for early/late completion of the contract. The purpose of this provision is to provide an incentive for on-time or early completion to minimize disruption to the public. With the extensions for extra work, the Contractor completed the work 57 calendar days ahead of the revised contract completion date. The above-described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. There is no replacement work in this change order. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 for an addition of $92,407.00 to the contract with Colich 8 Sons. There is a 37 calendar day time extension associated with this change order. (2) Acceptance of Contract as Complete Colich 8 Sons has fulfilled all contractual obligations within the specified and extended time. Therefore, staff recommends adoption of the resolution attached to the agenda material , authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the Final Closeout Agreement and filing of the Notice of Completion as required. The final project cost is $270,099.00. 9(w) : APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS RE ABANDONMENT OF RED HILL PUMP STATION, PHASE 1, CONTRACT NO. 7-14-1-1. In February 1990, the Directors awarded a Professional Services Agreement to Boyle Engineering Corporation for design and construction services for the -19- August 12, 1992 ' abandonment of nine District No. 7 pump stations in the Tustin Hills, Contract No. 7-14. These nine pump stations all drain naturally towards Peters Canyon Wash where Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) has recently constructed their Harvard Avenue Trunk Sewer (HATS). In June 1992, the Directors approved an agreement with IRWD providing for purchase of up to 3.02 MGD capacity in said HATS sewer to accommodate future flow from the abandonment of the nine pump stations in the Tustin Hills, the Navy Way Pump Station (future abandonment) and Dow Avenue Pump Station (already abandoned). The Red Hill Pump Station is the first one of the nine ready to be abandoned. Easements have been purchased and accepted and plans and specifications issued. However, because the local street sewers in one phase of the current development of Tract No. 14188 are not yet completed and ready for service, the Red Hill Pump Station abandonment has to be split into two phases. Phase 1 will include the lateral sewer pipeline needed to convey former pump station flow. This work should proceed now, prior to development work which will use the site. Phase 2 will include an additional new manhole and work necessary to intercept sewage flow and abandon the pump station. Staff recommends approval of plans and specifications and authorization for the General Manager to establish the bid date for Contract No. 7-14-1-1. The bid date is tentatively set for September 15, 1992. The engineer's estimate for this work is $140,000. 9(x): APPROVE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF ORANGE FOR RELOCATION F A PORTION OF THE I LER-RED HILL TRUNK SEWER SIPHON UNDER THE SANTA ANA-DELHI CHANNEL, CONTRACT NO. 7-1-2, IN THE COUNTY'S CHANNEL WIDENIN CONTRACT. The Gisler-Red Hill Trunk Sewer serves portions of the Cities of Tustin, Irvine, Santa Ana and Costa Mesa, as well as unincorporated County territory. The sewer flows in a southwesterly direction in Red Hill Avenue from the Lemon Heights area to the 405 Freeway. It then crosses under the San Diego Freeway and flows in a westerly direction under the Costa Mesa Freeway where it runs parallel to the San Diego Freeway to the College Avenue Pump Station. From there it is lifted to a gravity trunk sewer system to Plant No. 1. When the sewer was first constructed in April 1960, a permit was obtained from the Orange County Flood Control District for the portion crossing the Santa Ana-Delhi Channel right-of-way. No siphon was required at that time. In November 1965. the Orange County Flood Control District required a siphon when the earthen channel was deepened. In February 1992, County Sanitation District No. 7 (CSD 7) received a °Prepare to Relocate Notice" from the County of Orange, Environmental Management Agency, to accommodate the construction of flood control box culverts over the Gisler-Red Hill Trunk Sewer at the Santa Ana-Delhi Channel . The relocation construction must be completed prior to the scheduled bid date for the County's project. The siphon rebuilding can best be done concurrent with the channel work. This would eliminate contractor scheduling problems, reduce environmental permitting and allow both projects to be constructed under the same dewatering -20- August 12, 1992 and water quality control permits, all reducing costs. Staff proposes to prepare plans and specifications and include the construction in the County's project. The estimated cost for our portion of the work is $78,750. The recommended action is to approve a reimbursement agreement with the County of Orange to include relocation of the District's sewer in their flood control channel-widening project. ALL DISTRICTS 11: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE SPECIAL SELECTION COMMITTEE RE COMPUTERIZATION. The Special Joint Works Selection Committee Re Computerization met on July 16, 1992. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on its deliberations and recommended action for consideration by the Boards. 12: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF FISCAL POLICYIEXECUTIVE COMMITTEES. The Fiscal Policy Committee and the Executive Committee met ,jointly on July 29, 1992. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on their deliberations and recommendations for consideration by the Boards. 13: REPORT OF THE CONSERVATION, RECYCLE AND REUSE COMMITTEE. The Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee met on July 28, 1992. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on its deliberations. �.i 14: AGENDA FOR CLOSED SESSION. From time to time it is necessary for the Boards to convene in closed session to consider purchase and sale of real property, potential or pending litigation, personnel matters or other matters which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act. In order to avoid a situation where a closed session is needed but does not appear on the agenda, this standing item is placed on the agenda each month providing for a closed session at the regular meeting, if deemed necessary by the Boards. 28: APPROVE AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE OF CAPACITY AND PAYMENT OF OPERATIONAL AND MAINTENANCE HARE RELATIVE AN J AQUIN HILLS PLANNED COMMUNITY BETWEEN DISTRICTS AND 1 AND IRVINE RANCHKYAIM DISTRICT. Enclosed with the agenda material is a separate staff report and recommendation pertaining to a proposed agreement between Districts 5, 6 and 14 and the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) for exchange of capacity and reimbursement of connection fees previously lIected re ive to sewerage service for the San Joaquin Hills PI neF- W JWS:,jt -2 a BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Dlslrlcta P.O.Box 8127 10f144 Ellis Avenue of Orange County,California P.O. Valley.CA 9272"127 Telephone:(714)962.2411 �r JOINT BOARDS II AGENDA REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 12, 1992 - 7:30 P.M. in accordance with a requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call ( 3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tent, if necessary (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) (5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific-agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. (6 ) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. (a) Report of Joint Chairman (b) Report of General Manager (c) Report of General Counsel 8/12/92 ti . (7) EACH DISTRICT ACTION: 11 no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman: District 1 - July 8, 1992 regular District 2 - July 8, 1992 regular District 3 - July 8, 1992 regular District 5 - July 8, 1992 regular District 6 - July 8, 1992 regular District 7 - July 8, 1992 regular District 11 - July 8, 1992 regular District 13 - July 8, 1992 regular District 14 - July 8, 1992 regular (8) ALL DISTRICTS Cons Ue—ra l-on of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a 1 / desire to vote differently for any District. ) See pages "A" �•✓ "B" and "C" 7/01/92 7/15/92 7/29/92 ALL DISTRICTS Joining Fund - $1,114,606.29 $ 754,027.41 $1,348,618.71 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 2,392,924.95 2,737,571.94 3,566,669.69 Joint Working Capital Fund - 176,468.67 172,757.07 135,371.08 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 153,223.35 57,420.76 162,216.51 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 109,781.02 117,282.78 93,624.87 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 5,866.42 15,739.97 45,011 .83 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 168,549.26 17,123.89 152,482.24 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 185,160.12 17,612.17 735,744.54 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 417.96 99.65 2,160.85 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 52,940.28 4,443.81 80,088.19 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 926.99 8,159 .00 2,657 .92 DISTRICT NO. 13 - -0- 24.19 104.72 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 954,131.81 9,969.45 508,170.06 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 6 6 JOINT - 1,124.69 1,917 .20 3,505.22 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 6 7 JOINT - 2,263.66 -0- 32.49 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT 5,541.13 12.08 6,578.48 $5, 323,926.60 $3,914,161. 37 I ,843,037.`40 / -2- Y 8/12/92 (9 ) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 9 (a) THROUGH 9 (bb) All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not .requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items . All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. The Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS �i (a) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation for Purchase of Traffic Control Devices, Signholders, Signs and Accessories, Specification No. E-216; rejecting the bid of Pacific Safety and Equipment Company, Inc. as incomplete; and awarding purchase order to J. G. Tucker 5 Son, Inc. in the total amount of $43,689 .24 plus sales tax. See page "D" (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-104, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase and Installation of Fiber Optic Network Between New Laboratory and Maintenance/Operations Control Center, Specification No. M-040, to Sim J. Harris Company for a total amount not to exceed $59 ,223.00. See page "E" (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-105, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Anionic Polyelectrolyte Chemical Polymer, Specification No. P-132, to Diatec Environmental for the price of $. 039 per pound, plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning September 1 , 1992, with provision for four one-year extensions (Estimated annual cost $196,218 .08 plus sales tax) . See page "F" -3- v 8/12/92 (9 ) .ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-106, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Caustic Soda Solution, Specification No. P-133, to Western States Chemical Supply Corporation, for the delivered price of $271.88 per dry ton, plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning September 1, 1992, with provision for four one-year extensions (Estimated annual cost $897,204.00 plus sales tax to be shared as follows: ) See page "G" Treatment Trunk Plants Sewers Total Joint Districts $326,256.00 $285,474.00 $611,730.00 District 3 Only --- 285,474.00 285,474.00 $326,256 .00 1570,948.00 $897,204.00 (e) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation for Laboratory Services Contract for Analyses of Sludge, Specification No. 5-065; rejecting the bids of TBD Environmental Laboratories, C.L. Technology, Inc. and BC Analytical for non-compliance with the specifications; and awarding laboratory �..J services purchase order contract to MacDonald-Stephens Laboratories, Inc. , in an amount not to exceed $30,750.00, for the period August 13, 1992 to June 30, 1993, with option for four one-year extensions. See page "H" (f) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 11 to the plans and specifications for Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17, authorizing an addition of $136,617.81 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for two items of additional work, and granting a time extension of 63 calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page "I" (g) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue Change Order No. 3 to Purchase order No. 37965 issued to Sur-Lite Corporation for Purchase of Four Waste Digester Gas Flares, Job No. J-21A, for a reduction of the total authorized amount from $246,960.00 plus sales tax to $238,737.00 plus sales tax, for deletion of electrical termination work and costs due to delays impacting other construction projects. -4- r✓ 0 8/12/92 (9) ALL DISTRICTS (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (h) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 12 to the plans and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, authorizing an addition of $51,966 .00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation for four items of additional work. See page "J" (i) Consideration of the following actions relative to Gas Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-1: (1 ) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 22 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing a net addition of $56,349 . 33 to the contract with Ziebarth 6 Alper for 14 items of added or deleted work, and granting a time extension of 61 calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page "K" (2) Consideration of motion approving change order No. 23 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing a net deduction of $61,818.63 from the contract with Ziebarth a Alper for four items of deleted work or revised contract provisions. See page °L" ( 3) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-107, accepting said project as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "N" (j ) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 12 to the plans and specifications for Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1 , Job No. P1-34-3; Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation Plant No. 1 , Job No. P1-35-2; and Installation of waste Digester Gas Flare Facilities at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-21, authorizing an addition of $10, 336.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. , for two items of additional work. See page "N" -5- P 8/12/92 (9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (k) Consideration of the followingactions relative to Addendum No. 8 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for design of Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19, providing for additional inspection and design services: (1 ) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee - certification of the final negotiated fee for said services. See page "O" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-108, approving Addendum No. 8 to said agreement with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for said additional services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $292,024.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $4,179,112.00 to an amount not to exceed $4,471 ,136.00. See page "P" (1) Consideration of the following actions relative to Agreement with J. T. Horvath 5 Associates for specialized construction management and inspection services re various master-planned construction projects: (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for said services. See page 1191. (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-109 , approving said agreement with J. T. Horvath & Associates for said services, on an as-needed basis at the following hourly rates for a two-year period beginning October 11, 1992, with option for a one-year extension: Agreement Period Rate 10/11/92 - 10/10/93 $39.20 10/21/93 - 10/10/94 40.95 10/11/94 - 10/10/95 42.80 (m) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-110, approving Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Martin Rordick, Sr. for specialized construction inspection services re various master-planned construction projects, providing for extension of said agreement from August 10, 1992 through December 31 , 1992 with no increase in the hourly rate. See page "R" -6- 9 8/12/92 (9) ALL DISTRICTS (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (n) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate a Professional Services Agreement for design and construction services required for Rehabilitation of Clarifiers 3, 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-41, and Rehabilitation of Clarifiers A through Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-48. (o) Consideration of motion authorizing membership in the Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency (SARFPA) for the 1992-93 fiscal year. (p) Consideration of motion authorizing membership in the Southern California Alliance of Publicly Owned Treatment Works (SCAPOTW) for the 1992-93 fiscal year. DISTRICTS 2 & 3 (q) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-118, approving Agreement with the Garden Grove Agency for Community Development, electing a tax increment pass-through relative to an amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the Garden Grove Community Project, in accordance with Districts' policy and pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33676 . See page "S" DISTRICT 2 (r) Consideration of the following actions relative to the Professional Services Agreement with Church Engineering, Inc. for design and construction support services for Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, from Imperial Highway West of Kraemer Boulevard to the Intersection of Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associated Road, Contract No. 2-9-R1: (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for said services. See page "T" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-119-2, approving said agreement with Church Engineering, Inc. for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $119,524.00. See page "U" -7- A 8/12/92 (9 ) DISTRICTS 5 & 6 - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (s) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-120, approving plans and specifications for Improvements to Bitter Point and Rocky Point Pump Stations, Contract No. 5-32, and Improvements to Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date is September 15, 1992) . See page "y" DISTRICT 5 (t) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-34-3, authorizing an addition of $104,000.00 to the contract with Silveri & LeBouef for a contract-specified bonus payment for 52 days early completion of certain work, based on the rate of $2,000 per day. See page "W" DISTRICT 7 (u) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-121-7, receiving and filing bid tabulation and `.+✓ recommendation and awarding contract for Abandonment of Portion of MacArthur Trunk Sewer within John Wayne Airport, Contract No. 7-1B-1, to Colich Bros. , Inc. dba Colich & Sons, in the total amount of $62,000.00. See page "X" (v) Consideration of the following actions relative to Irvine-Newport Subtrunk Relief Sewer, Contract No. 7-3E-2: (1 ) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of $92,407.00 to the contract with Colich & Sons for seven items of additional work, and granting a time extension of 37 calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page "Y" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-122-7, accepting said project as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "Z., -8- 8/12/92 (9 ) DISTRICT 7 - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (w) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-123-7, approving plans and specifications for Abandonment of Red Hill Pump Station, Phase 1, Contract No. 7-14-1-1 , and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date September 15, 1992) . See page "AA" (x) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-124-7, approving Agreement with the Orange County Flood Control District, providing for reimbursement of costs to the Flood Control District for Relocation of Gisler-Red Hill Trunk Sewer Siphon under the Santa Ana-Delhi Channel, Contract No. 7-1-2, in conjunction with OCFCD improvements to the Santa Ana-Delhi Channel within the Cities of Tustin, Irvine, Santa Ana, Costa Mesa and unincorporated County territory; and authorizing payment of a $55,000.00 deposit for District's portion of said work. See page "BB" END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any -9- A 8/12/92 (11) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Report of the Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Computers and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee's written report of the meeting / on July 16, 1992 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) . (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-111, approving agreement with RJN Computer Services, Inc. , for design and installation of Computer-Aided Support System for Maintenance Management, Specification No. 5-059, in the amount of $548,525.00, including applicable taxes. See page "CC" (12) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee and Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committees' written report of their meeting on July 29, 1992 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) . (b) Consideration of action on the following items recommended by said Committees: (1) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-112, approving an Agreement re: Application for Specific Plan of Site Use and Development with the City of Fountain Valley at Reclamation Plant No. 1. See page "DD" ` 1 (2) DISTRICTS 2,3,5,7 6 11 ONLY �•W Consideration of the following resolutions amending Districts' resolutions confirming fees, procedures and policies concerning annexations of territory to the Districts, and foregoing the automatic annexation fee increase for fiscal year 1992-93: See page "EE" 1992 - 93 Confirming Acreage Fee Resolution Resolution w/Tax w/o Tax Dist. NO. No. Exchange Exchange 2 92-113-2 91-113-2 $2,922 $3,908 3 92-114-3 91-114-3 $3,154 $4,139 5 92-115-5 91-115-5 $3,054 $4,084 7 92-116-7 91-116-7 $2,902 $3,883 11 92-117-11 91-117-11 $4,843 $5,830 (13) ALL DISTRICTS Report ofEhe conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee's written report of their meeting on July 28, 1992 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) . -10- 1 y 8/12/92 (14) ALL DISTRICTS Closed Session: During the course of conducting the usine�set orth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards, the Chairman may convene the Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9 or 54957.6. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employee compensation; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as final actions are taken by the Directors on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary (b) Reconvene in regular session (c) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session. (15) ALL DISTRICTS 0 he�usTn-e-ss and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (16) DISTRICT 1 OEFe—rbusiness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (17) DISTRICT 1 Con�ge—ration of motion to adjourn (18) DISTRICT 2 Other -iness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (19) DISTRICT 2 Consi eration of motion to adjourn (20) DISTRICT 3 0 h—er�siness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21 ) DISTRICT 3 Consi-de—ration of motion to adjourn -11- f 8/12/92 (22) DISTRICT 7 oth—erruusiness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (23) DISTRICT Consideration of notion to adjourn (24) DISTRICT 11 Other mess and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (25) DISTRICT 11 ConsiderrRion of motion to adjourn (26) DISTRICT 13 Ot er uslness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (27) DISTRICT 13 Con— si�ion of motion to adjourn (28) DISTRICTS 5, 6 & 14 (a) verbal report of staff (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated August 3, 1992 re proposed Agreement for Purchase of Capacity and Payment of Operational and Maintenance Charges relative to San Joaquin Hills Planned Community. See page "FF. (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-125, approving Agreement for Purchase of Capacity and Payment of Operational and Maintenance Charges relative to San 1 / Joaquin Hills Planned Community (SJHPC) among Districts �.✓ Nos. 5, 6 and 14 and the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) , providing for the purchase by District No. 14 of capacity in transmission facilities owned by Districts 5 and 6, and providing further for the reimbursement by District No. 5 to IRWD of a prior overpayment of connection charges relative to properties within the SJHPC. See page "OG" (29) DISTRICT 5 0 h�ec Business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (30) DISTRICT 5 Consiffe—ration of motion to adjourn (31) DISTRICT 6 Other u and communications or supplemental agenda Stems, if any (32) DISTRICT 6 Cons eration of motion to adjourn ( 33) DISTRICT 14 0 fher mess and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (34) DISTRICT 14 Conte eiaUion of motion to adjourn -12- ARTICLE 8 Joint Operation §4840. Authority to execute agreement: Participation in State Employees' Retire- . ment System §4841. Contents of agreement -§4842. Provision for payment of costs,etc §4843. Contracts for joint acquisition, construction or use of sewage facilities §4840. Authority to execute agreement: Participation in State Em- ployees' Retirement System Whenever two or more sanitation districts find and declare by resolution adopted by their respective district boards that it is for the interest or advantage of the districts to do so, the districts by their respective district boards may enter into an agreement for the mainte- nance of a centralized and joint administrative organization to care for the general administration of the affairs of each of the districts, and the construction, supervision, operation, and maintenance of the work of each of the districts, and for that purpose the districts may agree to employ the same engineers, surveyors, counsel, and other persons needed to carry out the purposes of the districts. Such agreement may also provide for participation by said sanitation districts in the State Employees' Retirement System of the State of California and for the payment of apportionments of costs and the �.� collection, receipt and distribution of pension payments by one district designated for the purpose and acting on behalf of all districts participating in the agreement in the same manner as provided by Sections 4841 and 4842 of this code. When the agreement so provides, the designated district shall have all the powers and perform all the duties of a public agency for the purposes of the State Employees' Retirement Law, both in respect to the joint officers and employees of the participating districts and in respect to the officers and employees separately employed by the participating districts. Enacted 1939; Amended Stats 1945 ch 490§ 1. Prior Law:State 1923 ch'_50§19a,as added by Stars 1927 ch 178 § 1 p 324. Amendmants: 1945 Amendment:Added the second paragraph. Cross References: Public employees retirement system:Gov C§§20000 at seq. Joint sanitation project: Gov C§§55000 at seq. Collateral References: Cal Jur 2d Drains and Sewers§ 12. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS RE: AGENDA ITEM N0, 11 AI GRANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA IN44 ELLIS AVENUE PO SOX 9127 July 16, 1992 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 I11AI992.2411 REPORT OF THE SPECIAL JOINT WORKS SELECTION COMMITTEE RE COMPUTERIZATION Meeting Date: July 16, 1992 COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: William Mahoney, Joint Chairman J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Evelyn Hart, Vice Joint Chairman Thomas M. Dawes, Director of Engineering Charles Puckett, Chairman, Gary Streed, Director of Finance Fiscal Policy Committee Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of Peer Swan, Chairman, District No. 14 Maintenance Steve Hovey, Information Services Manager Wendy Sevenandt, Staff Engineer Absent: Buck Catlin, Past Joint Chairman Background At its May 28th meeting, the Committee continued to July 16th its consideration of the two proposed new computerization systems: the Computer-Aided Support System for Maintenance Management, Specification No. S-059; and the Computerized Facilities Records and Drawing System, Job No. J-25-1. The discussion centered around whether or not the systems should be implemented independently or simultaneously. Staff was requested to contact other organizations with a high likelihood of having installed both types of systems to determine what the experience and advice of those organizations was with respect to the advantages or disadvantages of separate or concurrent implementation. Enclosed is a Staff Report (gray) , dated July 6, 1992, summarizing the Survey of Sites Using CMMS and CAD/FM/GIS. Based on the survey, staff reported that it has concluded that the key factor is that proper planning for integration take place. If that is done correctly there is no need for the systems to be installed by the same supplier, or simultaneously. In fact, based upon the experience of the survey respondents, combined with staff's previous investigations, proceeding with implementation of the Computerized Maintenance Management System independently of the Computerized Facilities Records and Drawing System, has greater advantages to the Districts than any other scenario. (1 of 4) Report of the Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Computerization July 16, 1992 In addition to the above-referenced report on the Survey of Sites Using CMMS and CAD/FM/GIS, the fallowing background information has been reviewed by the Committee is also enclosed: Scope of Work: Computerized (Green) November 14, 1991 Facilities Record and Drawing System, Job No. J-25-1 Staff Report: Computerized (White) February 27, 1992 Maintenance Management System, Specification No. 5-059 Staff Report: Computerized (Pink) April 30, 1992 Facilities Records and Drawing System, Job No. J-25-1, Consultant Interviews Staff Report: Data Integration (Blue) May 21, 1992 versus Data Interfacing Staff Report: Staff Observations (Tan) May 21, 1992 of Firms for Job No. J-25-1, Computerized Facilities Record and Drawing System 1. Consideration of Professional Services Agreement with RJN Computer Services, Inc. for Computer-Aided Support System for Maintenance Management, Specification No. 5-059. On March 4, 1992, the Selection Committee gave staff the authority to negotiate a professional services agreement with RJN Computer Services, Inc. for the Computerized Maintenance Management System in an amount not to exceed $593,025.00. Staff reported that it has negotiated a contract which has been approved in form by the General Counsel . The major points are: 1. The price has decreased from $598,025 to $548,525. 2. Payment terms are: A. Fifty percent of software ($98,742.50) on issuance of Notice to Proceed. Funds to be placed in an escrow account in the Districts name until installation of software, estimated to be September 1992. B. Remaining fifty percent of software ($98,742.50) to be paid on installation of software. (2 of 4) Report of the Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Computerization July 16, 1992 C. Remaining monies will be paid monthly as professional services are rendered. 3. Access to the fourth generation language and Cassworks "Code" will be available to the Districts on-site in the event RJN ceases business. 4. RJN will name the Districts as additional insureds on a $1,000,000 Professional Liability insurance policy. This is in addition to the insurance the Districts required. 5. The warranty period is twenty-one months from the date of installation. Additionally, RJN will provide response services within twenty-four hours of notification. The contract is based on the Districts inputting 42,500 documents into the system. If the actual number is within five percent of the 42,500, either high or low, no adjustment will be made. However, if the actual number is more than five percent over or under, the contract will be increased or decreased accordingly. Committee Recommendation: Following a review of the staff recommendation the Committee recommends that the General Manager be authorized to execute an Agreement with RJN Computer Services, Inc. for design and installation of Computer-Aided Support System for Maintenance Management, Specification No. S-059, in an amount not to exceed $548,525, including all applicable taxes. 2. Computerized Facilities Record and Drawing System, Job No. J-25-1. At its meeting on March 4th, the Committee selected Lee 8 Ro/RJN Group, Inc. , a Joint Venture; John Carollo Engineers/Boyle Engineering Corporation/ Psomas, a Joint Venture; and James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers, Inc. as the three short-listed firms to be invited to make presentations to the Committee at its May 6th meeting on each respective firm's proposal for the Computerized Facilities Record and Drawing System, Job No. J-25-1. On May 6th each of the three firms made a formal 45-60 minute presentation (including a question and answer period) on the capabilities of their firm and how they would approach the task of computerizing the Districts' facilities records and drawings. Following the presentations and a debriefing, consideration of the proposals was continued to the May 28th meeting of the Committee. The above referenced staff reports dated November 14, 1991 (green) and April 30, 1992 (pink) outline the project in more detail ; and the reports dated May 21, 1992 (blue) and May 21, 1992 (tan) provide additional information and a summary of staff's observations of the interviews. (3 of 4) Report of the Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Computerization July 16, 1992 The Committee continued its review of the project and the short-listed vendors at its May 28th and July 16th meetings. After considerable deliberation the Committee concluded that before selecting a vendor the Districts should engage a consultant to complete a detailed needs assessment that would also better define the proposed system, its cost, and accommodate the selection process for a vendor to design and install the Computerized Facilities Record and Drawing System, Job No. J-25-1. Committee Action: The Committee directed staff to draft a Request for Proposals (RFP) to conduct a needs assessment for the Computerized Facilities Record and Drawing System for consideration by the Committee at its next meeting. JWS:sc Enclosures (4 of 4) W- 000NTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 0 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 109CJ ELLIS AVENUE AO SOX G127 MOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 992041127 0141862.2411 ✓ July 6, 1992 STAFF REPORT SURVEY OF SITES USING CMMS AND CAD/FM/GIS Introduction At the last meeting of the Special Joint Works Selection Committee, staff was asked to conduct a survey of local sites with a high likelihood of having both a Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) and a Computer Aided Design / Facility Management / Geographic Information System (CAD/FM/GIS) roughly equivalent to what the staff, Task Force and Committee have been considering for the Computerized Maintenance Management System, Specification S-059 and the Computerized Facilities Records and Drawing System, Job No. J-25-1. Purpose of Survey The purpose of this survey was to gather futher information based upon the experience of others in implementing such systems. These questions focused on whether the CMMS or the CAD/FM/GIS was implemented first, or whether they were both implemented at the same time. The questions also dealt with the issues of integration and interfacing of systems. Staff refined these questions to basically the following: 1. Do you have a Computerized Maintenance Management System? 2. Do you have a graphics-based System which also has one or more elemenis of Computer Aided Design, Facility Management, and/or Geographic Information Systems, sometimes also referred to as, simply, "mapping"? 3. If the answer is "yes" to both of the above questions, which system was implemented first? 4. Are these systems integrated or, in other words, linked together? 5. If they are not, are there plans to link them in the future? 6. If they are, were they linked from the start? 7. If they were linked later, which of the two application categories was the driving force for making the link? B. What were your experiences, good and bad, in implementing either or both systems? 9. If you had everything to do over again, what would you have done differently? Response to questions 1 through 7 are summarized in the attachmed Survey Matrix. It was staff's origine: intent to arrange for opportunities for members of the Committee to tour appropriate facilities with staff. Unfortunately, the results of the survey did not turn up a facility within any reasonable distance which possessed anything of interest to actually see. Organizations Surveyed A total of 22 organizations were contacted. The list of these organizations begins below, followed by various categorizations of these organizations: Wastewater Treatment Plants: League City Sanitation Department, League City, Texas Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, Boston, Massachusetts City of Los Angeles Wastewater Systems Division, Los Angeles, California Chino Basin Municipal Water District, Ontario, California City of Riverside Sewage Treatment Plant, Riverside, California Central Contra Costa Sanitary District, Concord, California Eastern Municipal Water District, San Jacinto, California Pinellas County Water Division, Tampa, Florida Orange County Public Utilities, Orlando, Florida Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts Water Treatment Plants: Metropolitan Water District, Claremont, California Public Utilities: .. Power: Southern California Electric Company, El Monte, California Palos Verdes Nuclear Power Plant, Wintersburg, Arizona Gas: Southern California Gas Company, Los Angeles, California Oil Refineries. Mobil Oil Refinery, Torrence, California ARCO Oil Refinery, San Pedro, California UNOCAL Oil Refinery, Wilmington, California Other Facilities: Fort Irwin, California Disneyland, Anaheim, California Knott's Berry Farm, Buena Park, California Ralph's, Los Angeles, California Von's, Los Angeles, California 2 LOCATION: Arizona . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 California Northern . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Southern . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Massachusetts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Summary of Survey Results The response to the telephone survey was so varied that categorization became difficult. The precise wording of the questions was only applicable to a small minority of those contacted. The conversation required more explanation and interaction between staff and the parties contacted to be able to come to a common understanding of terms and the level of detail being requested. A detailed copy of the telephone log is attached, showing the names of the contacts, phone numbers and their detailed responses. There were three negative responses not included in the log. Two were from major grocery store chain headquarters: Ralph's and Vons. Neither of these two had anything remotely similar to what we were inquiring about. The last negative response was from Southern California Edison. Corporate policy strictly forbids their employees from discussing their computer systems or software. The results of the rEmaining 19 respondents of the survey are as follows: Presently have a CMMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Presently have CAD in some form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Presently have GIS in some form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Presently have CMMS and either CAD, GIS or both . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Of those having CMMS + CAD/GIS, those who stated that they had CMMS first . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Of those having CMMS + CAD/GIS, those who stated that they had CAD/GIS first . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Of those having CMMS + CAD/GIS, those who could not specify first application . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Those having CMMS integrated with CAD/GIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Those who integrated both systems simultaneously initially . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 Those who are not now integrated but who plan on doing so in future . . . . . . 8 3 1 Respondents who were not integrated and had no plans of doing so saw no value for their organization in linking the two systems together. Consequently, the remain er of the questions regarding integration had no meaning to them. All of those respondents which already had fully Integrated CMMS and CAD/GIS systems were out-of-state and were using the RJN CMMS system CASSWORKS with their CAD/GIS packages. Each of the 5 integrated sites utilized a different vend is CAD/GIS package: Arc/Info, Intergraph, NovaCAD, and GeoVision. The five respondents which reported being integrated also responded that their systems were not developed at the same time as being integrated. Each reported that the development of the respective applications was done independently by different departments within their organization. The timing or sequence was clouded because, in some instances, the CAD/GIS application was implemented after a pro-existing CMMS was already in place but the CMMS was replaced with a more modern application at some point in time after the CAD/GIS application was Installed. In each instance where the respondent responded when asked what they would do differently, the response was that planning for integration would have been prefered. No one agreed that developing the two applications together would have Improved the chance of each system's success. When asked, if given a choice, which application should take the lead, all who responded stated that the CMMS system should be Implemented first. The rationale given was that developing a CAD/GIS system is a very time-consuming task which requires a great deal of work before tangible benefits begin to be seen. Howeve , a `✓ CMMS can be implemented in a relatively short period of time and tremendous cost efficiencies can be realized in the short term. They also observed that the organization's staff will benefit from the implementation of improved data management where little or none existed before. This experience will prove valuable as the CAD/GIS system is being developed, they said. All felt that no outside vendor could substitute for the dedicated efforts of those inaLag the organization to insure a "seamless" integration of the two systems. No one felt as though the issue of integration was that great of a concern, as long as it was planned for. One respondent regretted that their organization allowed their incompatible systems W be developed with no thought to the value of being integrated in the future. He star 9d that by simply p agnnirng for this Integration, they would have saved a lot of grief. The other organizations stated that their experience was less painful due to the high degree of internal communication within their respective organizations. When an atmosphere of open sharing of all forms of data exists, integration of computer systems -- even human interaction— seems to come more naturally. 4 Conclusions and Recommendations: The need to plan for integration should prevail regardless of whether the two projects are linked together in design by a single vendor and single project, or whether they are allowed to each proceed at their own respective pace. Staff further concludes that, based upon the experience of the survey respondents, combined with stairs previous investigations, that allowing the Computerized Maintenance Management System, Specification S-059, to proceed independent of the rate of progress of the Computerized Facilities Records and Drawing System, Job No. J-25-1, will be of greater benefit to the Districts than any other scenario. We therefore respectfully urge the Committee to approve the recommendations made previously with respect to both projects as follows. A. Staff recommends that the General Manager be authorized to execute the Professional Services Agreement and Issue a purchase order to RJN Computer Services, Inc. for Computerized Maintenance Management System, Specification S-059, in an amount not to exceed $548,525 including all applicable taxes. B. Staff recommends that discussions be continued to determine which of the three firms should be selected for futher negotiations eventually leading to a Professional Services Agreement for Computerized Facilities Record and Drawing System, Job No. J-25-1. (See attached staff report.) 5 SURVEY MATRIX CMMS CAD Which Integrated? If No,. If Yes, If Not, / First? Future Initially Which GIS Plans? o drove the choice v League City yes yes CAD yes --- no CAD MWRA yes yes ? yes --- no ? City of LA yes yes ? no yes ? Chino Basin yes yes ? no no --- --- City of Riverside yes yes ? no no --- --- Central Contra Costa yes yes ? no yes --- ? EMWD yes yes ? no yes --- ? Penellas County yes yes CAD yes -- no ? OC Public Utilities yes yes ? yes --- no CMMS LA County yes no --- --- --- --- --- MWD yes yes ? no yes --- CMMS SCE X X X X X X X Palos Verdes yes yes CMMS no yes --- CMMS SCG yes yes ? no yes --- ? Mobil no yes --- --- --- --- --- ARCO no yes --- --- --- --- --- UNOCAL yes yes CMMS no yes --- CMMS Ft. Irwin yes yes ? yes --- no CMMS Disneyland yes yes ? no yes --- ? Knotts no yes --- --- --- --- Ralphs no no --- --- --- --- Von's no no --- --- —77- --- --- . . TELEPHONE LOG Contact: �.✓ Bob McBrayer, Maintenance Supervisor League City Sanitation Department League City, Texas (713) 338-4848 Date called: June 1, 1992 Mr. McBrayer reported that his department began their mapping and CAD work using AutoCAD many years ago. The mapping was somewhat rudimentary. Later, they implemented Computerized Maintenance Management using a non-integrated stand- alone package. The next step they took was to upgrade their mapping to a true GIS system. They decided to use Arclnfo on an IBM RS 6000 Risc workstation. Finally, they obtained RJN's CASSWORKS software to replace their previous CMMS system. (Consequently, for purposes of our inquiry, they had CAD and mapping in place prior to implementing an integrated CMMS.) When asked what they would have done different if they could do it over again, Mr. McBrayer stated that he could not think of exactly how they would have done it differently, given their circumstances. I then asked him if the sgguence of events could have been done differently. Mr. McBrayer stated that it would have made no difference. Compatibility was never much of an issue. In his opinion, Mr. McBrayer stated that having a CMMS like CASSWORKS in place first would most certainly been ..J preferable because the superior data management of the Oracle data base would be in place for the CAD and GIS to tie into later. He stated that a CAD/GIS system takes very long to implement. The Maintenance function can be reaping the benefits of data organization for CMMS long before the CAD/GIS is ready. Although they made the decision to go to Arclnfo prior to purchasing CASSWORKS, it made no difference for them because CASSWORKS works with Arclnfo extremely well. I asked Mr. McBrayers' advice for our situation. He stated that we would be wise to implement the CMMS first before moving forward with the CAD/GIS system. i �J TELEPHONE LOG Contact: Mr. John Corliss, Project Manager, SAMS Project �. Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA) (617) 242-6000 ext. 4809 Date called: June 1, 1992 MWRA implemented Hydraulic Modeling, Mapping, CAD and CMMS — each separately at separate times as unique non-Integrated stand-alone systems. Essentially, the current SAMS Project is integrating all four applications, tying them into one effective system. When asked what they would have done differently and whether the sequence made any difference, Mr. Corliss stated that in his opinion the sequence of events would not have made that much difference -- as long as each application had been planned for integration. In their case, no thought had been given to integration when the original systems had been acquired. Mr. Corliss stated that planning for integration is not that hard, if done in advance. The Mapping and CAD functions are on separate computers from the CMMS. They are all linked together over a common network. ii TELEPHONE LOG Contact: �./ Steve Nakido City of Los Angeles Wastewater Systems Division (213) 485-3016 Date called: June 3, 1992 1 originally called Russ Larsen only to learn that he retired last February. Steve mentioned that their Computerized Maintenance Management System has only recently been installed. It is called SIMMS (Sewer Information Maintenance Management System) and was developed by CH2M Hill. The software runs only on an IBM mainframe. It is not linked to any GIS or CAD but there are plans to link it eventually. There GIS system is still in development at this time. The SIMMS is very awkward to use anc is causing them many problems. They share the mainframe with many other applicafions, some of which require the system to be taken down for backups or other processing during the day. When this occurs, the SIMMS is unavailable to anyone. The system also functions very slowly. They did not know enough about their SIMMS or their future GIS to be able to form an opinion about the pros and cons of their own experience, much less to give us advice on our systems that we are considering. iii TELEPHONE LOG Contact: Jack Lucky �.✓ retired 4 years ago from Lee & Ro Engineering Date called: June 3, 1992 Jack called me as a result of my call to Jim Hargraves to solicit information about past projects that parallel what we are planning to accomplish. Jack was involved in a system which Lee & Ro did for Fort Irwin for the U.S. Army. Jack explained that it will not be possible to visit Fort Irwin due to present security restrictions. The system at the Fort is run by contractors. In 1984 they implemented a Computerized Maintenance Management System using Knowledgeman II, customized for use by the Army at Fort Irwin. Afterwards they purchased Arclnfo to take advantage of the large number of AutoCAD drawing files that they had at Fort Irwin. It soon became apparent that they were outgrowing the old data base management system due to hardware limitations and the sheer volume of data. They are now moving to Oracle to take advantage of Arclnfo's close linkage with Oracle. Prior to implementing Oracle, integration with the previous CMMS was not possible. It required the use of a stand-alone text file which functioned as a cross-reference between CMMS data base file records and AutoCAD drawings. The CMMS data that changed each day had to be downloaded in a batch file at the end of each day. Consequently, there was a one day lag in the timeliness of the data. �✓ Fort Irwin's efforts were hampered due to many restrictions: lack of Pentagon support, lack of manpower, lack of personnel organizational structure, and lack of expertise. They were pioneers in accomplishing what they were trying to do at the time and had Tittle or no experience to draw upon. Rene Quinones, an electronic technician, is the most knowledgeable person who still works there. His number is'(619) 386-3743. All of Fort Irwin's systems were on PCs. I inquired as to which way he would recommend that we proceed, based on my description of our needs as perceived so far. Jack stated that it would not make a lot of difference. Both systems need to be integrated but integration is not hard to do. It is more critical to purchase a ready-to-use, out-of-the-box system. Not having an MIS department or any on-site expertise really hampered their efforts at Fort Irwin. However, this was also many years ago when most of the modern systems of today did not yet exist. iv TELEPHONE LOG Contact: ..J Fred Mouat, MIS Director Chino Basin Municipal Water District (714) 987-1712 Date called: 6/5/92 A visit was scheduled but Fred had to cancel. CBMWD is investigating the purchase of a CMMS at this time. They are leaning toward MR2 by Data Stream as a PC-based solution. This software package is Novell LAN compatible. They looked at Hansen software and decided against it. They did not elaborate as to why. They had not considered RJN's software. They will be hosting MR2 on a new PC LAN using Novell, linked to three existing Novell LANs. Their present CMMS which uses an IBM System 36 will be retired. The System 36 is being utilized for virtually all computing and the hardware is being retired as well. CBMWD has AutoCAD but they have no plans to link it with CMMS. They are active in their local section of URISA to keep abreast of BIS developments, but they have no plans to move into GIS. v - TELEPHONE LOG Contact: Doug Breese, Acting Maintenance Director �.✓ City of Riverside Sewage Treatment Plant (714) 351-6140 Date called: 6/5/92 They've owned MR2 by Data Stream for 2 years. However, they have only been actively using it for the past 6 months as their organizational structure wouldn't support it. It runs on a Novell-compatible PC LAN and includes Inventory Control and Plant Maintenance. They also use bar coding. They have recently acquired AutoCAD and are using it to ao single line drawings for their Electricians. They have no plans to tie in CAD with MR2. They also have no plans for mapping, either. It was interesting to note that they use Hansen software for their collection systems and are tying it in to GEMS for Engineering. They didn't like Hansen Software for Plant Maintenance and don't like MR2 for collection systems. They also see no need to tie the two CMMS systems together. vi TELEPHONE LOG Contact: �. Randy Brooks, Information Services Director Disneyland (714) 999-4602 Date called: June 8, 1992 Disneyland had a comprehensive CMMS that was mainframe-based for both Disneyland and DisneyWorld. However, the Disney theme parks have de-centralized in recent years and now Disneyland in Anaheim has its own PC-based CMMS running on a Novell network. The product they use is called Maximo, developed by PSDI in Irvine. It performs PM scheduling and tracking, incident reporting, maintenance record keeping, inventory of parts, etc. Disneyland has standardized on AutoCAD for many years for their Engineering Department. They have no FM or Mapping. They have considered linking their CMMS and CAD but they are many years away from actually doing anything because of the perceived high cost involved. Contact: John Spivey, MIS Manager Knott's Berry Farm �./ (714) 827-1776 Date called: June 3, 1992 They have no CMMS system at the present time. vii TELEPHONE LOG Contact: Bud Berry, Water Division Pinellas County, FL (Tampa/St. Petersburg) (813) 462-3588 Date called: June 4, 1992 Pinellas County instituted a county-wide GIS prior to the Water Division acquiring a CMMS (CASSWORKS). Everything has come together quite well. His advice to us is to implement the data management (CMMS) first and the CAD/GIS will easily fit in later. The CAD/GIS has long-term benefits but no short term benefit will be realized. However, a CMMS will provide almost immediate payoffs in terms of increased efficiency in the Maintenance area. They have their CAD/GIS on different computers than their CMMS. They find no difficulty in moving from one application to another over their network, oblivious as to which computer is running which application. Everyone can access the data they need without being concerned with which computer its coming from. The proper linkages were mapped out earlier when the systems were integrated. vill TELEPHONE LOG Contact: \i Bill Burkholder, Mapping Graphics Analyst Public Utilities Data Center, GIS Dept. Orange County, FL (407) 836-2925 Date called: 6/5/92 Bill was a former Consulting Engineer for Boyle Engineering. They use RJN's CASSWORKS for their sanitary collection system TV camera information. The TV data can be downloaded directly to the system. RJN's program also allows them to do "what if' cost analysis for repairs. Their GIS system is a joint venture between the City of Orlando, the County of Orange, and Property Appraisers. The sewer lines are now being digitized into the system. The County uses GeoVision, mainly because of the close tie-in to Oracle. The biggest plus to their system is the wide open architecture. The result of RJN's design is that everything is speeded up. Many intervening steps are eliminated. RJN has already done most of the work when you buy and install RJN's product. Other systems only have smaller pieces and end up having to customize the rest after they begin installation. .� They maintain the base maps on large DEC computers. They have 45 workstations, each with 32 Megabytes of memory. Virtually all are DEC 5000 workstations. Oracle provides the ability to tie key fields together over a network so that an application running in one machine can reference data base fields in another data base. This database cross-referencing eliminates redundancy and duplication. Bill's advice was to implement CMMS first -- collect and use the data well in advance of the graphics. There is a tremendous advantage to obtaining the benefit of establishing the data management first before the graphics tie into it. ix TELEPHONE LOG _ Contact: Curtis W. Swanson, Principal Engineer ...� Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (510) 689-3890 Date called: June 4, 1992 CCCSD's CMMS function was developed as a customized application on their process control computer in the early 1980's. By the mid 1980's they moved the application off of the process control computer on to the computer they used for their Accounting Department. The computer is a off-brand computer whose company is no longer in business, making the whole situation rather tenuous, at best. Separately, CCCSD purchased an Intergraph workstation many years ago to convert their hard-copy sewer maps to digital format. Their long-term plans are to develop a PM program and tie it in with the as-built drawings in AutoCAD. At the present time, nothing is tied together. He had no advice to offer as to which application would be best to lead off the integration effort. x TELEPHONE LOG Contact: ./ Wayne Wagner, Mapping Manager Eastern Municipal Water District (714) 766-1825 Visit made: 6/5/92 EMWD is an agency which provides both waste water collection, connection service, treatment as well as potable water connection and service. Their service area covers some 534 square miles, including Moreno Valley, San Jacinto, Lake Perris, Mead Valley, Temecula, Hemet, and East Hemet. The population of this area is approximately 300,000. They have five Wastewater treatment plants; three which treat to a tertiary level and the other two will soon be at full tertiary. EMWD's mapping and CMMS are not tied together at present but they do plan to do so in the future. He does not know how they plan to do it. He refered me to Leonard McCosh, their new Maintenance Engineer (714) 925-7676 ext. 322 for details. EMWD uses a very sophisticated Intergraph network of workstations. The main computer resides in the EMWD Annex Building and is connected to the Main Office via a microwave link. Within the buildings, the cabling is via Ethernet. The Annex contains workstations in Engineering/Design, Records/Archives, and the Plotter Room as well as Customer Service. The Main Office has workstations in Planning and in Operations. The Mapping Department is totally autonomous from Information Services. IS will eventually take over GIS operations but lacks the expertise at this point in time. The Mapping had to develop Its own expertise. The Mapping Department and its GIS system came about as a result of0desperation to keep up with the rapid growth of the service area. The manual system it replaced became so backlogged that they used to have a backlog of 700 tracts for plan checks. James M. Montgomery was awarded the contract to develop the GIS system known as the Records/Archives AM-FM Project in April of 1988. Maps and records had historically been given the lowest priority. Consequently, the scope of work was grossly underestimated and the project money ran out before all the map data could be converted. The maps only show connections, material of pipes, size of pipe, and the direction of flow. There is no data on depth, slope or other factors necessary for hydraulic modeling. The project began with construction drawings which were laid out on 100 scale sheets and digitized. Plan and profile is not scanned, only cataloged with file A TELEPHONE LOG reference numbers in the GIS system in a drawing number index. This drawing index is critical to their system. (We use the Thomas Bros. maps with our drawing numbers `.. recorded on the pages in red.) At EMWD, three different departments -- Mapping Creation, Operations, and Maintenance -- each use the GIS system. Each maintains their portion of the database and no one else can modify it. All of the departments sat down at the beginning of the project and divided up the database fields among the departments according to who should be responsible for the individual data field. Wayne mentioned that training is critical, especially depending on the platform chosen for the GIS. Intergraph is extremely difficult to learn and is much more technical than AutoCAD. Contact: Leonard McCosh, Maintenance Engineer Eastern Municipal Water District (714) 925-7676 Ext. 322 Call made: 6/10/92 Leonard McCosh was the Director of Maintenance at the City of Riverside. AT EMWD they now are using MR2 by Data Stream, exactly the same package as the City of Riverside. However, they are unhappy with it because they cannot use it for Collection Systems -- it is for Equipment Maintenance gnly. It is not "user friendly" and is very restrictive. Last, but not least, it will not integrate (or even interface) with the GIB system. Leonard used to be in charge of maintenance�up at Salt Lake City and he used Facilities Management Technologies' product. It was more user-friendly but still had the same problems. Salt Lake City now has Hansen Software. Leonard considered Hansen Software but decided against it because it still is not user friendly and is too restrictive. Leonard stated that he is talking with RJN about CASSWORKS. Based on his investigation, RJN's product is the only one which has proven itself to integrate successfully with GIS systems like theirs. Hansen Software claims that they can do it also, but they don't have the track record that RJN has. Also, RJN's software is more flexible and user-friendly than Hansen's. The only problem is that EMWD doesn't have the money. RJN's software is expensive. However, it looks so good that they may just waft until they can get the money to buy it. They really don't have much choice because of their need to integrate with their GIS. He mentioned that Doug Breese at the City of Riverside took over for him when he came to EMWD. Another contact at the City is Ernie Malloy, who is over the xii TELEPHONE LOG Collection System. They use Hansen Software for the Collection System because ..J MR2 won't handle Collection Systems. They use Hansen to integrate with the city's GIS system (Arc/Info). Apparently Arc/Info is the only GIS system has tried to integrate with. xiii - .TELEPHONE LOG _ Called: Ted Yoshida, Mapping Manager ..� Southern California Gas Company (310) 605-7821 Date called: June 15, 1992 SCG has no AM/FM per se. All GIS and CAD work is done on Intergraph Microstation computers. CMMS is done via customized software developed in-house but he is not that familiar with it. He refered me to Mitt Omoto: Called: Milt Omoto, Engineering Southern California Gas Company (213) 244-5160 Date called: June 15, 1992 SCG has applications which can be categorized under the general definition of "Computerized Maintenance Management" but are customized specifically for a gas company, including such modules as 'leakage control', etc. All of these applications run on an IBM main rame. They are not linked into their CAD or GIS systems but they recognize the value of doing this and hope to do so someday. He is not sure about .. the timing of such plans and what problems might exist. He will have someone from their Information Systems Department call me regarding these details. Called: Jack Stobbs, Manager of Computer Applications Development Southern California Gas Company Date he called: June 16, 1992 SCG is now implementing the use of custom-built hand-held computers for use by their field personnel. They are in the process of merging their Distribution Division with their Transmission Division to optimize the use of field personnel. The hand-held computers have a kay pad as well as a bar-code reader. All SCG equipment is being labelled with bar code tags. The hand-held computers upload their data every night to PCs. The RDBMS they use is Oracle. There is no present tie-in to their extensive CAD and GIS system but they hope to do so some day. The hand-held units funtion as an inventory and data collection device and does not constitute a proper CMMS. xiv `,J TELEPHONE LOG Called: ./ Nick Bell Mobil Oil Refinery, Torrence (310) 212-2800 Date called: June 16, 1992 They have no comprehensive CMMS system. They have a collection of PCs each with small DBMS custom-written to handle discrete maintenance functions. There is no connection to any CAD or GIS system that Engineering might have and no plans to do such a connection. Called: Bob Seibert ARCO Refinery (310) 816-8120 Date called: June 16, 1992 The only semblance of CMMS ARCO has is mainframe-based on a mainframe computer in downtown LA. Their system was developed many years ago on a PROFS system. Everything is customized, old, and extremely cumbersome. Their ..J maintenance department has almost totally abandoned it in favor of small applications they have developed themselves on PCs they've smuggled in. Their applications are developed in various spreadsheet and database packages such as Lotus 1-2-3 and dBase III. Their MIS Department takes months to accomplish anything and cannot respond with the speed that is necessary for an oil refinery. He knows that their GIS and CAD system is state-of-the-art but there is no connection with the mainframe and they essentially have no truly functional CMMS. xv TELEPHONE LOG Called: `.✓ Steve Giampaoli, Maintenance Manager UNOCAL Refinery, Wilmington (310) 513-7624 Date called: June 17, 1992 UNOCAL has used a comprehensive CMMS system since 1981. It is a software package developed and sold by HP to run only on HP computers. They run their system on an HP-3000 computer. UNOCAL has CAD and related software packages but they run on other computers and do not tie in with their CMMS. They are in the very early stages of selecting a new CMMS system that will run on the HP-9000 which is a mainframe system. The new system will include the ability to tie into the computers that run the CAD systems. The Master Plan is to have each refinery have its own HP-9000 and each will run the exact same CMMS software package. All refineries will be linked together, as well. All of this is being engineered by UNOCAL's Computer Division headquartered in Shomburg, IL Wilmington's team member for this Master Plan effort is one of their department heads, Jim Turner (513-7609). xvi TELEPHONE LOG Called: John Velotta, Manager of Client Services Palos Verdes Nuclear Power Plant (602) 250-3146 Downtown Office (602) 393-6156 Power Plant Office Date called: June 17, 1992 Palos Verdes has an extensive mainframe-based CMMS called SIMS (Station Information Management System). This system was developed in-house using Texas Instruments CASE tool Information Engineering Facility (IEF). (CASE stands for Computer Aided Software Engineering). The SIMS system is more sophisticated than the CMMS systems running at their other fossil-burning power plants such as Four Corners. The system at those plants is called FIMS (Fossil Information Management System). All of these software packages were developed in-house by a spin-off company known as El. El spun off another group known as Stagg Systems. Eventually Stagg %stems bought out El and now Stagg owns the code and maintains the SIMS and FIMS systems. Stagg is marketing a commercial version of SIMS knowns as EMPRO. SIMS does not tie in to any other systems such as CAD. They are now developing a more up-to-date CMMS known as JIMS. This software package uses IEF extensively and a Graphical User Interface (GUI). Their future plans include a comprehensive configuration management system utilizing CAD, equipment data base, bill of materials, document management systems, and a link to their planning and scheduling system Prestige, which runs on PCs. They have over 2,000 PCs all running on a Banyon Vines network. They also have several hundred Sparc workstations running in a UNIX environment. They will also tie in their HRIS system which tracks employee training and certification as well as radiation exposure monitoring data. They are also developing a Material Management System. Integration is not a big concern as they develop all of their own software and use the .same software systems environment: IEF. xvii TELEPHONE LOG Called by Wendy Sevenandt: Bryan Bergstrand Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts They have a CMMS which was developed in-house to run on an IBM mainframe. Their as-built CAD system is started but there is no link between the two systems. The CAD project is on hold due to funding problems. Called by Wendy Sovenandt: Susan Walker, Project Manager Metropolitan Water District (714) 392-2908 Date called: 6/18/92 They have had a CMMS which was developed using Paradox. However, they are in the process of evaluating a new CMMS. They are implementing a 2 phase project to integrate CMMS and CAD mapping. The fat phase is to select and implement a new CMMS. The 2nd phase would link the CMMS with other District systems, including CAD mapping. They are presently in the process of evaluating a new CMMS. Called by Steve Hovey: Mel Santiago, Data Base Analyst Metropolitan Water District (714) 392-2908 Date called 6/19/92 They have been using SAM from Date Stream Systems as a prototype CMMS which runs in Paradox. It is fairly primitive and limited in its capabilities. They are presently evaluating 5 vendors for a CMMS. These choices include Maximo, EM by Specific Designs Inc., and ELKE from Minnisota, as well as 2 others he did not mention by name. All of these are Facility and Equipment Managers. They do not cover Fleet Management or anything similar to what we need for Collection Facilities. They will not develop one from scratch. They have also been using Fleet Tracker for their Fleet Management system. They plan to run their new CMMS on a yet-to-be-purchased minicomputer system. xviii COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS T .I ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 1O EWS AVENNE November 14, 1991 P.o.SO.8127 POYMAIN VALLEY.CAuwRNw M72M127 . n+m eazxn SCOPE OF WORK Computerized Facilities Record and Drawing System Job No. J-25-1 I. SUMMARY Conduct a needs assessment and prepare specifications for acquisition of computer work stations and software to develop and maintain facility drawings of Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2; produce a complete computer generated set of plant process and utility drawings; and establish a computer system for facilities layout, land use mapping and hydraulic modeling of the Districts' collection system. II. BACKGROUND To meet the Districts' growing wastewater load requirements and to comply with stringent federal and state environmental regulations, new facilities have been constructed and existing facilities have been modified through many construction contracts. Facilities have also been modified by the Districts' staff. Record drawings of the construction projects are kept on file. Although these drawings adequately document the facilities constructed, they do not describe the treatment process as a complete system comprised of the individual process units, utilities, system interfaces, instrumentation, and electrical network, nor are they cross referenced. Due to the layered construction of most treatment processes, information for the process systems must be located through many construction projects. Minor in-house modifications, including those made in an emergency, are not documented. With the continual expansion and modification of the District facilities, the ability to access process information readily is critical . Combining the information - from project drawings, information gathered from Districts' staff, and investigation of actual plant installations to generate a complete set of master drawings would be invaluable for design, operations, maintenance and training functions. An evaluation of the Trunk Sewer Conveyance System resulted from the 1989 Master Plan project. Land use areas were determined and flows projected. The data was entered, in spreadsheet format, to a hydraulic model to simulate flow through the trunk system and pump stations. The results of 1 the model lead to the recommendations for future expansion as described in the Master Plan. The land use mapping information and hydraulic modeling data are available for establishing a computerized system to be used by Districts' staff in locating information on the trunk sewers and �..✓ projecting flows and system expansions. III. PRE-DESIGN MEETING Prior to beginning work, a meeting with Districts' staff shall be held to establish appropriate contacts and review the Consultant's plan to implement this work. IV. WORK ELEMENTS The Consultant shall provide engineering services to conduct an assessment to determine the computer system best suited for the needs of the Districts, prepare specifications for the acquisition of the computer hardware and software, prepare plans for the layout of the system at the Districts offices, produce CAD drawing standards, establish a database, develop data management procedures, provide training, and complete two tasks for the production of plant and collection system drawings. The first task will be to initiate a plan and work with the District staff to develop a computer generated master set of facility drawings of Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley, Treatment Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach and all interconnecting utilities. Facility and utility mapping shall be completed to show all plant processes, utilities, and structures as they are actually installed. Process and instrumentation diagrams and loop diagrams shall be produced. The second task will be to implement a facilities mapping, land use mapping and hydraulic modeling computer system portraying the Districts service area of Orange County with the Districts' trunk sewer system superimposed upon the base map of the service area. This system will be used by the Districts to generate a layered computer map which will classify the land use, show the collection system, maintain information pertinent to the collection system, and model the collection system for planning purposes. A. GENERAL The Consultant shall provide a recommendation for a computer aided drafting and information system to manage the Districts' records and drawings. Plans and specifications for the system shall be developed; a database shall be constructed; standards for all drawings shall be produced; a data management document shall be generated; and training shall be provided as detailed below. 2 1. .COMPUTER SYSTEM FOR DISTRICT OFFICES a. Needs Assessment The Consultant shall conduct a needs assessment to determine the computer system which would best suit the Districts planned applications. The results shall be documented and a recommendation shall be made that is substantiated by the assessment. In addition to the Districts' planned applications, consideration shall be given, as a minimum, to the existing and planned equipment and computer systems at CSDOC, systems used by Orange County and the cities served by the Districts, systems used by other Consultants and Contractors who have projects with the Districts, availability of personnel qualified to use the system, and cost of system implementation and operation. The Information Services Division has developed a guideline for acquiring computer equipment which was approved by the Board of Directors. This guideline shall be considered in the system selection process. Deviations in system selection not consistent with this guideline must be justified in the needs assessment document. Compatibility or system integration with the planned Computer Aided Support System for Maintenance Management shall be considered and addressed. Other information which the Consultant perceives to be important in the selection shall be included in the evaluation. `✓ This system must be able to handle the data, studies, and programs and drawings assembled by Tasks I and II of this project and the Power System Studies, Job No. J-25-2. This computer system will be used to incorporate changes to the master files including new plans, "as builts", maintenance changes, and associated data. The system shall be set up for planning, design, construction, operation, and maintenance applications. The investigation and report shall address links to the existing networks, system configuration and software programs necessary including drafting program, database, modeling program, file manager, and a text editor. A report shall be generated that documents all aspects of the needs assessment as outlined above and as determined pertinent to the selection of the Computerized Facilities Records and Drawings System. Five copies of this report shall be submitted to the Districts for review and comment. Ten final copies of the document incorporating any comments shall be submitted to the Districts. 3 b. Plans and Specifications The Consultant shall prepare Plans and Specifications required to procure and install a complete and functional computer system to handle the information and tasks developed by this scope of work. The Plans and Specifications shall be prepared to the Districts' standards for public bid. Five copies of the Plans and Specifications shall be submitted to the Districts for review and comment at the 50% and 90% complete points. Typically, a four week time period should be allocated for the Districts' review of each submittal . All comments shall be incorporated into the final Plans and Specifications. Reproducible plates of the final Plans and Specifications shall be delivered to the Districts. Printing of the document will be performed by the Districts at Districts' expense. The specifications shall describe the computer system and associated software which will be required by the Districts' staff to access and maintain the drawings and database information and perform the collection system modeling. The Consultant shall identify the hardware requirements in the specifications for the complete system including remote computer stations and links to existing computers and networks. Plotting hardware shall be specified which provides plotting capabilities at the Plant No. 1 Engineering area, Operations and Maintenance areas at both plants, and at the Construction Management trailers of both plants. The printer at the Planning and Design area shall be an electrostatic type printer capable of printing 400 dots per inch (dpi) at a minimum rate of 1/2 inch per second. A required feature is the capability to print copies of the master files at remote printers. Plans for the layout of the computer system, all work stations and printers at the Districts' offices shall be prepared. The Plans shall show any link to the existing backbone network. The Consultant shall work with the Districts staff to determine which personnel shall have work stations at their desks and where stations shall be set up for general use. In the Engineering area, stations will be used by the staff responsible for revisions to the master files. Remote stations shall be used by various departments for data and drawing access. 2. STANDARDS The Consultant shall work with the Districts staff to develop CAD standards for the drawings prior to the execution of the drawing generation tasks. The standards shall establish the basic 4 guidelines for the drawings. The basic guidelines for the drawings shall address drawing format definition, standard drawing symbols, layer convention, text styles and sizes, line weights, ..J arrowhead styles and sizes, piping and equipment identification abbreviations, color assignments, plotting standards, drawing file identification, number of drawings per file, and title blocks. The Consultant shall work with the Districts to identify other elements which require standardization. A book of CAD standards shall be produced which documents all the standards which will be used to generate the CAD drawings. The book shall be divided into two parts - one for the plants and interconnecting utilities system and the second for the collection system. This book will become the CAD standard for future design projects. During the development of the standards, example sheets for drawings shall be created which illustrates the general appearance of the drawings, standard symbols and abbreviations. Three copies of the draft standards book along with the sample drawings shall be submitted to the Districts for review and comment prior to the continuation of the project. Comments made by the Districts shall be incorporated into the final standards. Reproducible plates of the final standards shall be delivered to the Districts. Printing of the document will be performed by the Districts at Districts expense. 3. DATABASE DEVELOPMENT The development of the database is a critical portion of the project for both the Utility and Facility Atlas and the Collection System mapping. The capabilities of a relational database used with a CAD system is not fully realized by the Districts. The Consultants task here is to investigate the Districts use of information by various departments (i .e. Engineering, Construction, Maintenance, Operations, Technical Services), consolidate the information, and present the results in a format which would show staff the extent of the database and how the information would be manipulated. The Consultant shall work with the Districts' to determine the information to be included in the initial database. Factors which will influence the decisions will include necessity and cost. Provisions for expansion of the database shall be included. A database will also be developed for the Maintenance Management project referred to above. Integration of the two databases shall be considered. 4. DATA MANAGEMENT The Consultant shall prepare a "Data Management System" document to manage the files created from both tasks. This document shall 5 i .contain the guidelines for a data management system which will protect the files, control revisions to master files, and gather , information generated by the various groups on changes and new work. This data management system must be able to track on the �..� drawings planned design projects, proposed changes, "as built" revisions to the drawings and changes made through operations and maintenance. Software used to manage the files shall be specified and included in the specifications. Forms to facilitate the data management procedures shall be developed. The data management system shall address the use of the database with the CAD program and modeling program. Report formats shall be developed for inclusion in the data management system. The Consultant shall work with the Districts to develop reports which can supply information required of the various departments. The Data Management System document shall include sample reports and instructions to generate the reports. Integration with other District systems shall be addressed, such as the Maintenance Management system. The document shall estimate the staffing requirements to effectively utilize the system and identify their responsibilities. The intention is to have a minimum number of CAD drafters responsible for making updates. These drafters should be responsible for making copies of the master files onto floppy disks and printing hard copies for requesting personnel . Three copies of the draft document shall be submitted to the Districts for review and comment. All comments shall be incorporated into the final "Data Management System" document. Reproducible plates of the final document shall be delivered to the Districts. Printing of the document will be performed by the Districts at Districts' expense. S. TRAINING The Consultant shall develop a training program and provide training. The training program shall identify personnel to receive training and present a schedule to accomplish the training. The Consultant shall work with Districts' staff to develop a program which meets with Districts approval . The CAD training shall commence at the start of the project and continue through the data entry phase. The intention is to have the Districts personnel familiar with the programs so that they can work with the CAD drafters during the data entry phase of creating the drawings and database. These Districts personnel shall be able to use the system in a fully functional capacity at the time the project is completed and turned over to the Districts. 6 r When the drawings are completed, the Consultant shall also provide overview training for 25-30 of the Districts supervisory personnel . This training shall introduce the system, show what information is accessible, teach the personnel how to access the programs and maneuver through the drawings and access database information. A separate training session shall be conducted for the collection system engineering supervisors on how to use the modeling program. 6. EXISTING CONSTRUCTION AND SHOP DRAWINGS Existing drawings and databases are available for viewing to assess the amount of effort necessary to complete this scope of work. Field verification of information is required. Existing computer files and databases will be provided to the selected firm. B. TASK I PLANTS AND INTERCONNECTING UTILITIES The Consultant shall initiate the task to generate the original master set of CAD drawings which will consist of the facility and utility maps, process and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs), and loop diagrams for Reclamation Plant No. 1, Treatment Plant No. 2 and interconnecting utilities. The first step will be to develop a base map for each plant. Upon acceptance of the base maps, the Consultant shall proceed with the generation of a utility map for the Headworks No. 2 area at Plant No. 1. The Consultant shall also produce the P&IDs and loop diagrams for this area. Five copies of these drawings along with copies of the files shall be submitted for review and comment before proceeding with the entire set of drawings. The Consultant shall work with the Districts to determine the drawing conversion technique which would economically accomplish the conversion of the remaining plant information to CAD format. The method of choice is not stated here due to rapid progress and improvements in this field. The Consultant shall involve Districts personnel (to an extent acceptable to the Districts) during the drawing and database production to allow the Districts personnel to become familiar with the system. Temporary work stations shall be provided by the Consultant as deemed necessary to carry out the drawing and database production and training effort. At a minimum, the drawings shall have the information described below: 1. FACILITY AND UTILITY MAP A complete set of drawings shall be produced on the CAD system for Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2 as well as all 7 interconnecting utilities which shall depict each plant as a group of processes which are interrelated to make a complete system. These drawings shall show the plants in plan view, with all tanks, basins, buildings, diversion structures, roadways, equipment, piping, valves, gates, stop logs, weirs, other piping appurtenances, manholes, underground pull boxes, power distribution panels, power distribution transformers, motor control centers, branch circuit panels, motors greater than 1 horsepower, free standing control panels, computer work stations, duct banks, telephone and data networks, fiber optics, conduits, cable raceways, and the point of electric service (with meter number) shown. The drawings shall use the Districts established plant coordinate and grid system. A base map for each plant shall be developed in a layered method to show the plant perimeter, river and other surrounding features, roadways, tunnels, duct banks, tanks, trees, and a footprint of basins, buildings and other structures. All existing facilities and facilities under construction shall be included and identified. Tunnels, duct banks and roadways shall also be identified. Topographic features and the superimposition of areal photographs with the facility maps shall be included if the assessment phase recommends a system with these capabilities. All utilities shall be depicted in a layered method as developed in the standards for this project with the option to select specific utilities for viewing and printing. Sectional views at areas of intensive piping and cross sections of various areas in tunnels and at tunnel intersections shall be produced. These sections shall be accessible from the graphics screen through menu driven commands. Cross-sections shall identify the elevation of the utilities, pipe service and size, conduits and cable trays. Cross-section drawings shall be created in sufficient quantity such that there is no section in the tunnels which does not have a representative cross-section drawing. References between the plan view and the cross-sections are required. Categories of pipe service shall be as identified in the 1991 Edition of the Standard Specifications. References from one printed sheet to another shall be indicated where process streams Interface. All coordinates which are field verified shall be indicated as such. Piping information which shall be shown on the drawings include line size, material of construction, process flow direction, and the process material being conveyed. This information can be in a code form developed in the standards. 8 Identification of conduit size and contents of the duct banks , shall be included. Capabilities shall be provided to allow the generation of a conduit schedule. Information shall be contained in a database which identifies construction projects by Districts' job numbers and makes reference to shop drawings. Through computer commands, the information shall appear in the respective areas on the drawing or printed in a report format. 2. PROCESS AND INSTRUMENTATION DIAGRAMS Process and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs) shall be made which represent all tanks, basins, equipment, pipe lines, instruments, and instrument signal lines and interlocks. These diagrams should be generated in accordance with the standards developed above. The base P&IDs should have tanks, basins, equipment and major process pipe lines identified. Tanks and basins shall be identified by name with the volume, average retention time, maximum hydraulic flow capacity, weir elevation, and maximum temperature and pressure indicated, as pertinent. The line size, material of construction, process flow direction, and the process material being conveyed shall be identified for all piping. Lines discharging to the atmosphere shall be indicated as such. All valves, gates, weirs, stop logs, and other piping appurtenances shall be shown. Piping codes and abbreviations are acceptable, but must be defined. Pipe schedule abbreviations shall conform with the 1991 Edition of the Standard Specifications, Section 39-0130. Categories of pipe service shall be as identified in the Standard Specifications, Section 39-0140. All major process flow lines and auxiliary utilities shall be shown. Major process flow lines include raw sewage influent, screenings, grit, primary influent, primary effluent, primary sludge, scum, secondary influent, secondary effluent, waste activated sludge, thickened waste activated sludge, return activated sludge, and digested sludge. Each auxiliary utility shall have a process flow sheet dedicated to that utility. All storage areas shall be identified with the flow from each area represented. The flow representation shall have branched lines to show all destinations of the utility. The sheet numbers and equipment, basins or tanks to which the utility flows shall be identified. These utilities include plant water, industrial water, potable water, high pressure air, instrument air, chlorine, ferric chloride, ferrous chloride, low pressure digester gas, high pressure digester gas, natural gas, steam, hot water, chilled water, high pressure air, low pressure air, foul air, caustic, acid, and polymer. 9 On the printed sheets, references at the line match points shall be made. The references to be indicated are the continuation sheet number and equipment, tank or basin where the line terminates. Instrumentation shall be identified in accordance with the Districts standard symbols. All instruments should have District assigned tagnames which shall be used. Instrument tagnames not previously assigned will be provided by the Districts. A lead sheet shall be provided identifying each symbol , code and abbreviation used on the P&IDs. Through menu driven commands in the P&ID graphic screen, the associated loop diagram for an instrument shall be accessible. 3. INSTRUMENT LOOP DIAGRAMS Instrument loop diagrams shall be generated using CAD in conjunction with a database for all instrument loops. This includes both field and control room control loops, as well as both analog/discrete recording, indicating, and alarming loops. In general , loop drawings will be associated with one unique instrument loop. When instrument loops are cascaded, a separate (cross-referenced) loop drawing should be created for each individual loop. Instrument tagnames will be provided by the District in conformance with the "CSDOC Instrument Tagnaming System". All electrical connections associated with the loop should be depicted on the drawing, including all junction box, control panel , and terminal strip connections, as well as power supply source (with disconnects) for electronic controls. A database in spreadsheet form (LOTUS) currently exists which contains information on existing instruments and is used to assign tagnames to new instruments during the design phase of a project. This spreadsheet data shall be entered into a database system which can be linked with the CAD program. C. TASK II COLLECTION SYSTEM A computer aided facilities management and modeling system shall be established at the District offices to allow data access, data control , facilities mapping and collection system planning by District personnel . The computer system shall consist of a central relational database linked with the CAD system for mapping and a hydraulic modeling program for the sewer system. The base map for the system shall be provided by the Districts. This map will be obtained from the Orange County Environmental Management Association Surveyors Department. If necessary, the Consultant shall 10 provide conversion of this base map to the format necessary for the system selected during the needs assessment. The facility map shall show: The entire Districts service area District boundaries Drainage basin boundaries Composite land use map showing planning zones City, County, and State roads and highway right-of-ways The complete collection system including pump stations, pipes, diversion structures, manholes and nodes Facilities numbering system for easy reference Land parcels in the unincorporated area of District 7 System software with the capability of measuring land areas to eliminate hand planimetering methods shall be provided. The software shall automatically store area data to appropriate spaces in the relational database. Modeling software shall give Districts' personnel the ability to determine sewage flow projections, determine the normal and optimal routing of sewage flows, and assess impacts of expansion and growth. Through the facility map and relational database, the system shall have the capability for data storage and manipulation and report generation. At a minimum, the information shall consist of: Facilities reference number (Station #, ID # or other identification) Sewer reference names Construction contract number and date Location and limits of sewer lines Pipe elevation, size, material of construction, coating or liner, roughness Record slope of pipe Flow monitoring data (design d/D ratio, velocity, flowrate) Type and size of manholes Surface elevation and diameter of manhole ring and cover Surface elevation of surrounding land or street Invert elevation of pipe entering manhole Invert elevation of pipe leaving manhole Distance between manholes Pump station locations Pumping equipment data Force Main length and size Modeled D/d ratio, velocity, and capacity Excess capacity District 7 (unincorporated area) track number, connection Permit nos. , dates, and addresses Industrial dischargers to corresponding manholes or nodes ` / 11 Additional data determined valuable shall be added into the system. The database software will automatically import all data generated by the sewer model and provide for report generation. The Consultant shall work with the Districts personnel to develop report formats. The goal of this project is to not duplicate the information included in the proposed maintenance management system, but to link the projects together to make all maintenance information accessible and perform modeling and data retrieval while in the graphics screen. The Consultant shall investigate and provide the software and documentation which will accomplish this task. The Consultant shall gather, review, and integrate the existing record data provided by the Districts and data from the 1989 Master Plan gravity system computer model . The results of the 1989 Master Plan modeling effort will be reproduced via this integrated. CAD/facilities management/modeling system. Hardcopy gravity system maps at 1"=4000' scale and hardcopy color coded land use mapping at 1"-4000' will be available at the Districts Office. Hardcopy tabulations of model system input data and output reports and model schematics will be available at the Districts' office. Note that existing system model data includes only those manhole nodes necessary to account for points of inflow to the CSDOC system, diversions, and changes in pipe size or slope. The Consultant will provide a manual which clearly explains the procedures used to operate the system. The manual should describe the - software used and the inter-relationships between the software. The manual shall be assembled in three ring indexed binders. Five copies of the manual shall be submitted for review and comment. Ten copies of the manual with all comments incorporated shall be submitted. V. MEETINGS Project status meetings shall be held a minimum of once a month between the Districts' and the Consultant's project managers. Additional meetings shall be held as necessary. All meeting must be documented by the Consultant with a concurrence of that documentation by the Districts' project manager. VI. MONTHLY REPORTS Monthly progress reports shall be submitted for review and must include as a minimum: 1) current activities, 2) future activities, 3) potential out- of-scope items, 4) concerns and possible delays, 5) percentage of completion, and 6) budget status. VII. QUALITY ASSURANCE (OA) The Consultant shall administer a program of QA procedures for producing quality work. Specific procedures shall cover, but not be limited to, 12 planning, coordination, checking, reviewing, and scheduling the work. All documents prepared by the Consultant shall be subject to the .. Consultant's in-house procedures prior to submittal to the Districts for review. Each submittal shall be accompanied by a written statement from the principal-in-charge of the project which states that the documents have been reviewed and indicates who has checked the documents being submitted. Substitution of managers by the Consultant will require the approval of the Districts. The project is subject to cancellation if this approval is not obtained by the Districts. The Consultant must provide a statement acknowledging that no kickbacks, fees or remuneration of any type may be received from any manufacturer or supplier for which a recommendation is make on the project. If, in fact, the project casts (computer system procurement and installation) when bid exceed the budgeted amount by 10%, the Consultant will provide services and recommendations to reduce that amount at no additional cost. In submitting a proposal , the Consultant must acknowledge that the proposal is based on a comprehensive and complete review of the request for proposal including this scope of work which is an attachment to the request for proposal . VIII. SUPPORT SERVICES The Consultant shall provide support services throughout the procurement and installation phase for the computer system. Support services shall include submittal reviews, assistance in information requests and change order requests, system check-out and acceptance. For a period of one year following the completion of the above tasks, the Consultant shall be available to assist Districts personnel regarding any software and hardware problems or difficulties related to this project. IX. SCHEDULE The tentative schedule for this project is as follows: o Approval of Professional Services Agreement: DAY 1 o Completion of needs assessment: DAY 1 + 4 MONTHS o Completion of plans and specifications: DAY 1 + 6 MONTHS o Completion of CAD Standards and Data Management Documents: DAY 1 + 12 MONTHS o Completion of database and Headworks 2 area map: DAY 1 + 18 MONTHS o Completion of drawings on CAD: DAY 1 + 30 MONTHS 13 i o Establishment of collection system computer map and model : DAY 1 + 30 MONTHS The Consultant shall develop a graphic schedule to display the proposed `..� schedule above with milestones identified. STAFF ASSISTANCE The Districts' staff member assigned to work with the Consultant on the project is Wendy Sevenandt, (714) 962-2411 . FILE:WS\J25\scope.3 14 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1 OEAA ELus AVENUE FOJNTAiN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 1127289127 9141962.2411 February 27, 1992 STAFF REPORT Computerized Maintenance Management System Specification No. S-059 Summary On November 22, 1991, the Special Joint Works Selection Committee held a meeting to review the project goals and consider the consultant interview process for the proposed project for a Computerized Facilities Records and Drawing System,Job No. J-25-1. during discussions, two issues were raised: (1) whether to utilize three-dimensional computer aided drafting (CAD) for the Computerized Facilities Records and Drawing System for the plant atlas; and (2) whether to combine that project with the pending project for Computerized Maintenance Management System, Specification No. S-059. This staff report addresses the proposed acquisition of the Computerized Maintenance Management System and recommends that its procurement proceed independently of the Computerized Facilities Records and Drawing System. Rackeround In 1983, the Districts completed construction of secondary treatment facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2 under federal and state construction grant project C-06-1073-140. The total estimated cost of this project was $31,321,000. The project included the primary effluent pump station, main air compressor building, air separation and liquid oxygen storage equipment, secondary clarifiers, return sludge pump station, plant water pump station, and tunnels at Plant No. 2. During the past several years the closeout of the project grata has been delayed pending the inspection, audit and claims resolution. Recently, all of the outstanding issues with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) pertaining to the project were resolved. The final work required relates to installation of a computerized maintenance management system. The EPA and SWRCB are requiring that a formal computer-based preventative maintenance system be developed for all plant equipment. The system is to summarize all of the preventative maintenance work recommended by equipment manufacturers and document that the work is completed. If the deficiencies are not corrected, all associated costs will be declared unallowable, and the grant funds will be recovered by the EPA and SWRCB. Computer Automation Master Plan In June 1991, the Districts' Boards of Directors adopted a computer automation master plan which incorporates the following elements: A. Adoption of the following network configuration: - Phase 1 The installation of a dual-host minicomputer system provided by Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) on an Ethernet network backbone. This system will fully support the Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) with network connections to all Laboratory facilities at both Plant 1 and Plant 2, together with the existing Local Area Networks for Technical Services. The hardware configuration will also provide the majority of the computing hardware needed for a Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) to be implemented in Phase 2. (This system was purchased at a cost of$567,000 and installed in August 1991.) Phase 2 The extension of the Ethernet backbone already installed in Phase 1, together with any necessary network peripheral equipment and software. Ibis will be in support of the CMMS. This will add Operations & Maintenance local area networks (LAN) located at Plant 1 and Plant 2 to the Ethernet network. (The budgeted amount for 1991-92 is $900,000 for all hardware and software.) B. Connect the computer systems provided for in the Plant No. 1 Control Center Instrumentation, Job No. J-23-2 and the Replacement of the Computerized Monitoring System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P244 into the Ethernet backbone. Provide a software interface to enable summary data to be transferred directly from Operations process monitoring and control computers into the Administrative network. This will eliminate costly and error-prone duplicate data entry, as well as provide more accurate and timely reporting. ($1,500,000 is budgeted through 1992-93.) C. Full implementation of the Computerized Facilities Records and Drawing System, Job No. J-25 will provide a means of accessing CAD drawings on-line showing plant facilities and structures, utility lines within the plant, "as built" drawings of plant utilities, electrical schematics, sewer trunk lines and feeders, as well as possible tie-ins to Orange County's GIS system. Additional modifications will be made to the network to make these resources available to all nodes of the Administrative network. Additional modifications will enable these resources to be fully utilized within the CMMS, as well as technical drawings, exploded views of machine parts, and such diverse features as video excerpts from sewer line investigative studies for Collection Facilities. ($2,500,000 is budgeted through 1993-94.) 2 'aa Computerized Maintenance Maaaeemeat System WHYS) Staff has actively investigated several available CMMS packages, including those supplied by �i EMA, Keith-Stevens, ABC, RJN Computer Services, J.M. Montgomery, Hansen Software, CHAMPS, J.B. Systems, and S.E. Technologies. As a result of the investigation, a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) was issued to twelve firms. The RFQ requested that the suppliers submit a statement of qualifications, references, resumes of key personnel, a description of how they would propose to accomplish the work, a complete description of their software and pricing information. The suppliers were advised in the RFQ that the Districts' staff would evaluate and rank the proposals and that the top-rated proposers may be invited to meet with the Districts Selection Committee for an oral presentation. Responses were received on December 17, 1991, from six firms. Staff has reviewed the submittals and ranked them as follows (see attached summary): 1. RJN 2. J.B. Systems 3. J.M. Montgomery 4. CHAMPS 5. Diagonal Data o) 6. Management Analysis Company of These firms submitted a letter stating they were declining to submit proposals. In addition, as part of the evaluation staff has contacted 23 users currently using one of the systems mentioned above and has used this information in their evaluation. The most essential function of any Computerized Maintenance Management system is Work Order Processing. This general categorization includes Preventive Maintenance, Corrective Maintenance, Maintenance Cost Accounting and Stockroom Inventory Management. This would apply not only to treatment plant maintenance but also maintenance of all wastewater collection facilities including manholes, sewer lines and pumping stations. The common element to all of these operations is the creation and maintenance of intricate computerized records related to specific valves, engines, electrical components, pumps and instrumentation. These records enable the Districts to maintain such equipment according to the wide variety of specifications recommended by the various manufacturers, adherence to warranties and other factors. Additionally, it allows the Districts to compare maintenance costs by model and manufacturer type, scheduling and budgeting materials and manpower for future maintenance, as well as tracking the maintenance history of a particular component throughout its useful life. At the present time, contemporaneous maintenance records are kept on various cards and forms- all paper based. However, the sheer size of the physical plant of the Districts has made the continued use of such paper-based records unmanageable. Additionally, the use of paper-based "'� 3 records does not allow the cost accounting and maintenance cost comparison and other analyses that would be possible with computerized record keeping. gas✓ The need to access video data obtained via the TV inspection of sewer lines, pipes, manholes and other collection facilities can be helpful, but it is not critical. In a similar fashion, the ability to display line drawings, schematics, shop drawings, facility maps and other types of graphic representations would also be helpful, but it is not critical. The capability for these functions to be performed was included in the selection criteria and the top ranked vendor has demonstrated an ability to meet this requirement. Uniform Computerized Systems Reauirements The functionality of accessing video and graphical data hinges on three issues, two of which have been approved by the Boards as part of the Minicomputer Hardware System and Network Master Plan: 1. Communication Interface. Adherence to the IEEE 802.3 network standard, commonly referred to as "Ethernet". Ethernet is an industry-wide standard, not a vendor-specific standard. As such, the use of Ethernet should not hamper or restrict any system recommended by an engineering consultant or staff. 2. Database Management System (DBMS) Interface. A relational DBMS based upon the Structured Query Language (SQL). SQL is an industry standard with many applicable DBMS products available and not specific to a particular vendor. The CMMS system proposed by staff uses a particular product known as Oracle. This DBMS is the premier SQL-based DBMS in use today. However, the advantage of SQL-based DBMS is that any SQL-based DBMS will communicate freely with any other SQL-based DBMS. Oracle is hardware-independent and will operate on and communicate with more than 130 different hardware platforms from more than 80 different vendors — more than any other SQL-based DBMS product in existence. This insures the greatest flexibility and breadth of choices possible for any potential system recommended by an engineering consultant or staff. 3. File Format Readability. The third issue is file format readability. The CMMS product proposed by staff for the Districts will accept the following formats: Raster: CALS CCITT Group 4 (GP4); CCITT Group 4 with a TIFF header CnF); CCITT Group 3 2D FAX with a TIFF header GV); Run Length Compressed (RLC or VID); CIMAGE (DSI); Intergraph GP4 (CM IS/CAD: AutoCAD (DWG); Intergraph (DGN); ARC/INFO Other: HPGL plot files; ASCII TXT; DXF; SLF The variety of formats supported by this CMMS software is broad enough to cover all of the 4 "✓ major vendors that could be reasonably considered for any potential system recommended by an engineering consultant or staff. Any format not included on this list would be so obscure as to not be desirable for the Districts consideration due to its incompatibility with the systems in use by the other engineering firms which conduct business with the Districts. Corscfusions and Recommendations The Maintenance Department has been studying the need for the proposed Computerized Maintenance Management System for several years. The staff is confident of their evaluation of the proposed system that best meets those needs. Whereas, the proposed Computerized Facilities Records and Drawing System, Job No. J-25-1 has just begun. The Scope of Work document for Job No. J-25-1 makes it clear that this project is a joint-effort study between the selected consulting firm and the Districts staff. A considerable amount of study will be necessary to determine the exact specifications and requirements for the District's future utilization of Computer Aided Design, Facility Mapping, Automated Mapping, Geographic Information Systems and any other categorization of graphical output deemed necessary. The technology in use in these areas is in a constant state of transition, as are the needs of the Districts. It will require this type of a project(Job No. J-25-1) to identify and match these needs with the optimal supporting technology. It is the opinion of the staff that lock-stepping the two functions together -- Job No. J-25-1 and the acquisition of a Computerized Maintenance Management System — would not serve a purpose. The function of accessing drawings and maps by the CMMS is a relatively minor function and not as vital as the other functions mentioned previously. Also, as noted above, the acquisition of the proposed CMMS should not overly constrain any future recommendations and would provide the optimum flexibility possible to enable future system to be accessible by the CMMS. In August 1991, staff submitted a letter to the SWRCB requesting that, because of the progress made by the Districts in the areas of Maintenance Department computerization, they reconsider their position to withhold final payment as the construction grant for the Plant No. 2 secondary treatment facilities (approximately $1.1 million). They responded in a letter to the General Manager that "Based on Districts' progress towards computerizing maintenance management at Plant No. 2 and the Districts' obvious commitment to complete the progress we (SWRCB) are recommending grant project close-out and final grant payment for all outstanding C-06-1073 grant projects." It is staff's belief that undue delay in acquiring a CMMS would result in a reversal of the SWRCB's decision. Therefore, staff recommends that the procurement of the Computerized Maintenance Management System proceed independently of the Computerized Facilities Records and Drawing System, Job No. J-25-1, and be finalized as soon as possible. 5 EVALUATION SHEET Computer Aided Support System for Maintenance Management Specification No. S-059 P P C R J J. S 0 O H J: M B.Y' S: I . ;N. M S.. S N M T I T P E B S S.. M. _ L S; E 5 0 5 0 5 Experience - 5 years + 10 1 9 10 5 Installations - 10 minimum 5 0 5 0 3 Q.A. program plus copy of Q.A. Manual 1 0 1 l 1 Proposed Schedule of Workshops 2 0 0 1 0 - Cost Breakdown of manhours and associated expenses for workshop 1 0 1 1 0 Standard Rate Schedule for programming modifications 1 0 0 0 0 Description of custom modifications 1 I 1 0 1 Training manhours - recommended number 1 0 0 1 1 Qualification statement 5 0 -5 5 3 Key personnel breakdown and resumes 5 0 5 5 0 Description of tasks 0 0 0 0 0 Software 1 0 l I 0 - description of systems capabilities I I 1 0 0 - programming languages 1 0 1 0 0 - hardware requirements 1 0 1 0 0 Statement acknowledging Scope of Work I 0 0 0 0 Conflict of Interest Disclaimer 1 0 0 0 0 Errors and Omissions Insurance 24 24 24 24 22 General System Requirements 17 17 17 17 16 Reporting Requirements 44 32 44 44 0 Sewer Maintenance Management Module 14 0 14 14 0 Physical Inspection Module 36 35 36 36 36 Plant Maintenance Management Module 11 5 11 Il 0 Image Management Module 1 1 I I I Non-Collusion Affidavit I 1 I I I Insurance Requirement Certification 191 118 184 173 95 TOTAL POINTS EVALUATION SHEET Computerized Maintenance `f Management System Specification No. S-059 03/04/92 C ,, R J I.S. H J I M B.Y A N: M S M 'T DESCRIPTION P E S M S $277,040 $97 ,924 $120,000 -Professional Services 29,000 16,900 5,000 Direct Cost N/A 96,600 N/A Sub-consultant Fees 45,000 31,714 N/A Fixed Profit $800/day 351,040 243,138 125,000 Subtotal, Professional Services Including Training 70,595 40,000 -Sewer Maintenance Management Module 48,595 18,000 -Physical Inspection Module 92,595 30,000 79,500 -Plant Maintenance Module 35,200 25,000 -Image Management Module N/A 95,6000' 9,6750' -Annual Licensing Costs 166,i100m Extra Costs $689,900°' $598,025 1 $617,738 $214,175'4j TOTAL CONTRACT o' This is a recurring Annual Licensing fee. m Bid states "total records conversion could be accomplished for an additional $166,000." o' Considered non-responsive because costs exclude software and are for professional services only. Total represents the average number of days to accomplish the same task for RJN, JMM and JB Systems x $800/day. 14) Considered non-responsive because costs exclude software and professional services to complete the tasks in the Collection System. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .1 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA April 30, 1992 100IC ELLIS AVENUE FO BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92729.8127 114I982-2411 STAFF REPORT Computerized Facilities Records and Drawings System Job No. J-25-1 Consultant Interviews SUMMARY On April 10, 1991, the Boards of Directors authorized the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate a professional services agreement for Job No. J-25, Utility and Facility Atlas and Power System Studies. Subsequently, this project was separated into two jobs: Job No. J-25-1: Computerized Facilities Records and Drawings Systems Job No. J-25-2: Power Studies for Plants 1 and 2. On November 13, 1991, the Boards of Directors authorized the Special Selection Committee to solicit proposals from three qualified firms for Computerized Facilities' Records and Drawing System, Job No. J-25-1, and to interview the firms and negotiate a Professional Services Agreement for the project for consideration by the Boards at a future meeting. These interviews are scheduled for May 6, 1992, as follows: PROPOSING FIRMS TIME INTERVIEW LOCATION LEE & RO/RJN GROUP, INC 5:30-6:15 p.m. Board Room (A Joint Venture) JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS/ 6:20-7:05 p.m. Conference Room "C" BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION PSOMAS (A Joint Venture) JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, 7:10-7:55 p.m. Conference Room "A" CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. The original staff evaluation of the Statements of Qualifications is summarized for the three firms and is included as Attachment "A". BACKGROUND On November 22, 1991, the Special Joint Works Selection Committee held a meeting to review the project goals and consultant interview process. From the interviews, the most qualified firm will be selected by the Committee for negotiation of a professional services agreement. In addition to negotiating the fee, the scope of work will be finalized thereby allowing the benefit of that firm's expertise in developing the final scope of the project. 1 1 ./ r This staff report reviews the project goals and provides a guideline for . evaluating the consultants during the interviews. The scope of work is attached for reference. PROJECT GOALS The goal of the Computerized Facilities' Records and Drawing System is to provide a means to keep track of the physical installations for the collection system, the treatment facilities and interconnecting utilities. The system is envisioned to include computer systems to process and store the information which would be linked with the existing networks; standards for uniform drawings; maps of the collection and treatment facilities; a relational database for accumulation of information; a data management system; process and instrumentation diagrams; loop diagrams; and a hydraulic modeling program for the collection system. At the March 4th meeting, the Committee considered and rejected the ideas of combining Job No. J-25-1 with the Computerized Maintenance Management System, Specification No. S-059; and making Job No. J-25-1 a three dimensional system. The project will provide a means to maintain records and information which support design, construction, operation, and maintenance functions. Some applications of the system would be: o Keeping track of underground utilities o Checking existing installations during the design or rehabilitation of facilities o Training of maintenance and operations staff o Locating equipment in the field o Investigating field routing of piping o Generating maps as requested by staff o Flow modeling to determine impacts of growth on the collection system o Maintaining annexation information o Generating plan and profile views of the collection system piping o Providing reference material for all departments. With the ongoing expansion and modification of Districts' facilities, the ability to readily access process information is critical . Information gathered from construction drawings, shop drawings, "as built" inspection files, operations, maintenance, and investigation of actual plant installations would be combined through this project to verify and generate a complete set of master drawings of the treatment processes and auxiliary systems. CONSULTANT EVALUATION GUIDELINES The attached rating chart lists fourteen elements which could be used by the Committee as a guideline for the evaluations. The Consultant's presentation should demonstrate the ability to accomplish the tasks described in the scope of work. A key element to the success of the computerized system is the creation of the relational database and the ease of access to the information from the 2 e graphics screen. Three dimensional (3D) applications will not be applied to the initial system, but the potential to expand to 3D capabilities is desired. Cost estimates are not required at this point; yet, a space is allotted for evaluation of cost should the issue be discussed. This project has a recommended allowance of $3,000,000 in the proposed budget, spread over three years, including $1,000,000 for fiscal year 1992-93. The presentations should leave the members of the Special Selection Committee with a sense of confidence as to the abilities of each firm or team to accomplish the project. a./ 3 y ATTACHMENT "A" STAFF EVALUATION OF THE STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS The evaluation of the three proposing teams is summarized here based upon the evaluations originally made prior to the selection of the successful consultants who would continue in the selection process. The successful consultants are: 1) Boyle Engineering Corporation/John Carollo Engineers/Psomas and Associates (B/JCE/P) 2) James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. (JMM) 3) RJN Computer Services/Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers (RJN/LR) The Statement of Qualifications submitted by the above firms and teams were reviewed and evaluated by CSDOC staff. Below a table has been developed to compare the capabilities of the firms as demonstrated through the Statement of Qualifications. The firms' qualifications were rated on the seven items listed below on a scale of 1-5. A score of 5 represents the best capabilities as compared to the other SOQ's. Then a weight factor (1-10) was applied to each item to stress its relative importance. 1. Demonstration of similar project experience through graphic examples, project descriptions and sample documents. This pertains to both treatment facility and collection system applications. (Weight factor = 10) 2. Demonstration of extensive use of a relational database while in the graphics mode to access information. (Weight factor - 10) 3. Experience of company in wastewater treatment and sewer collection system planning and design. (Weight factor - 8) 4. Location of company. (Weight factor - 6) 5. Approach to computer systems implementation. (Weight factor - 4) 6. Overall staff confidence that the project will be successfully implemented to meet the Districts needs. (Weight factor - 2) 7. Experience with CSDOC. (Weight factor - 6) 1 n°'/F,m B/JCE/P JMM RJN/LR PROJECT EXP. 40 50 50 DATABASE EXP. 50 50 50 PON EXP. 40 40 32 LOCATION 30 30 18 APPROACH 20 20 20 STAFF CONFID. 8 10 8 CSDOC EXP. 30 18 24 TOTAL 218 218 202 Comments on evaluation: B/JCE/P - The Boyle/Carollo Engineering Team demonstrated an extensive amount of experience both in wastewater treatment and collection systems planning and design. Many District projects have been performed by these firms. Boyle has the computer background and experience required to meet the needs of this project. Subsequent to the submittal of the Statement of Qualifications, Psomas withdrew from the Psomas/HDR team and joined the Boyle/Carollo team. Psomas brings sound computer capabilities in Geographic Information Systems to this joint venture. JMM - Montgomery demonstrated extensive experience in all areas related to this project. Additionally, JMM provided sample documentation which shows their ability to successfully provide the documentation necessary to maintain the system after implementation. JMM has been providing assistance in obtaining the Orange County base maps for use in this project. They have used these maps for County of Orange projects. RJN/LR - RJN possesses extensive experience in computer data management and mapping systems. Both RJN and LR have the wastewater treatment experience adequate for the project, and but three other submitting firms have more related experience. Lee & Ro has been involved in Districts projects for many years. Project management may be hindered by geographic location since the computer group is located in Illinois. RJN has been awarded the Computerized Maintenance Management System project, and has opened a local office. 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 1 91 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA May 21, 1992 109O9 ELLIS AVENUE PO.BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 91.1962.2A11 STAFF REPORT Data Integration vs. Data Interfacing RE Computerized Maintenance Management System, Specification No. S-059 and Computerized Facilities Record and Drawing System, Job No. J-25-1 BACKGROUND The Maintenance Department has been investigating various vendors to supply a Computerized Maintenance Management System (Specification No. S-059) for use by the Districts for over 5 years. As the Maintenance Department began finalizing its selection of potential suppliers for a solution for its needs, it was recognized that some areas of common interest with Job No. J-25-1, Computerized Facilities Record and Drawing System, existed. During the course of investigating the market for the two systems, the ability for CAD/AM/FM/GIS drawings generated for Job No. J-25-1 in the Engineering Department to be utilized within the Maintenance Management solution selected by the Maintenance Department was evaluated. A major driving force behind timely implementation of the Computerized Maintenance . i Management System, as discussed in the Staff Report dated February 27, 1992 (copy enclosed) which was presented in the Special Joint Works Selection Committee Meeting of March 4, 1992, is a condition in the final closeout of the EPA/SWRCB construction project grant for secondary treatment facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2 requiring installation of a computerized maintenance management system (CMMS). In light of the progress made by Districts staff towards the scheduled acquisition of a maintenance management system as of August 1991, the SWRCB decided to release the final funds (approximately $1.1 million). Failure to acquire and complete installation of the CMMS in a timely manner would jeopardize the grant and require return of the funds to federal and state authorities. Over several months, the Maintenance Department staff has narrowed their search to three potential vendors. This was accomplished by a task force comprised of representatives from each of the five Maintenance Divisions and the Information Services Division. The final three firms were requested to submit proposals which were evaluated and coupled with an in-house demonstration. The final determination of the task force was a unanimous recommendation that RJN Computer Services provided the best solution for the best price. It was also shown that RJN's solution provided the ability to utilize the broadest and most vendor-independent range of 1 CAD/AM/FM/GIS graphic data formats of any other potential Maintenance Management vendor available. The report and recommendation dated February 27, 1992 (copy enclosed) was submitted to the Special Joint Works Selection Committee at the meeting of May 6 for their consideration and recommendation to the full Board. The Committee decided at that time to continue its consideration until the next meeting. More recently but concurrently over the past several months, the Engineering Department has proceeded with planning to provide the Districts with a computerized facilities record and drawing system to modernize their management of existing drawings, to provide new electronic means of mapping underground utilities, drawings and other graphical data and its interoperability with other related functions such as hydraulic modeling. This is the eventual goal of Job No. J-25-1. It was further determined by the Engineering Department that the expertise of outside consulting specialists in this field was needed to assist the Engineering Department in conducting their needs assessment, preparing specifications, building the systems, and performing the data entry and mapping. Consequently, selecting a firm to provide this assistance has become the essence of the Scope of Work for Job No. J-25-1. The Special Joint Works Selection Committee was established to help in the selection of a firm from the qualified candidates (see enclosed staff report dated April 30, 1992 and Scope of Work dated November 14, 1991). The candidates were narrowed down to three: 1. Lee & Ro Engineering/ RJN Group, Inc. (A Joint Venture). 2. John Carollo Engineers/ Boyle Engineering Corp./ Psomas (A Joint Venture). 3. James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineering, Inc. At the Special Joint Works Selection Committee meeting of May 6, presentations were made by each of the above firms. A number of questions were raised regarding the perceived linkage of the data required by each of the two applications -- the Computerized Facilities Record and Drawing System and the Computerized Maintenance Management System. Claims were made by one vendor (RJN) which implied to some that unless their firm was selected to provide the Computerized Facilities Record and Drawing System a question could be raised as to whether the selection of one application (Specification No. S-059) could be made mutually exclusive of the other (Job No. J-25-1) without a downside risk in one of many areas such as cost, data availability, ease of data access, etc. A determination on the Maintenance Department's request for approval for RJN as the vendor for the Computerized Maintenance Management System, as well as the selection of a firm for the Computerized Facilities Record and Drawing System, was continued until May 28, 1992 and pending this report. 2 MAINTENANCE vs ENGINEERING DATA NEEDS The needs for data management by the Maintenance Department are very different than the needs of the Engineering Department. The Maintenance Department's proposed use of RJN's software solutions includes the following software modules: 1. CASSWORKS Core Module: containing system-wide utilities and routines for the following modules to use. 2. Sewer Maintenance Module. 3. Plant Maintenance Module. 4. Sewer Physical Inspection Module. 5. Image and Document Management Module. The above referenced and enclosed Staff Report dated February 27, 1992 addressed the strengths of RJN's Image and Document Management Module for CMMS. However, the issue of common data needs in other areas was not raised and, therefore, not previously addressed. It is essential that a Maintenance Management System maintain the level of detail necessary for the Maintenance Department to be able to track maintenance history, parts inventory, equipment location and use, materials, manpower needs, costs, etc. The individual items of data in such a database are not mutually exclusive to the interests of other Departments and Divisions within the Districts. For example, Work Order Requests for maintenance or repair can be initiated from any other Department or Division in the Districts that perceives the need. If a secretary's overhead light fixture stops working, she can initiate the request for Maintenance to investigate and make the necessary repairs. Nevertheless, the responsibility for maintaining the data involved with such repairs resides with the Maintenance Department. Computerization has resulted in the ability to create a tighter linkage of data exchange between various facets of an organization. This could tend to blur the distinction between areas of responsibility between Departments or Divisions within an organization. However, if there is already a clear understanding of "data ownership" and "responsibility", greater efficiency ra effectiveness is realized. It is possible to have multiple "physical" databases (even in different computers) that behave as a "single" database. It is possible, and indeed quite common, to organize such database structures such that the various data elements are "owned" by different organizational units which are in the best position to insure their timeliness, accuracy and integrity. Some of the data elements included in the Maintenance Department's proposed Computerized Maintenance Management System are in common with Engineering's data elements. These include manhole numbers, line segment numbers, drawing numbers, etc. If each department were to have it's own unique designators prior to 3 -.r computerization, a valid concern would exist when computerization is introduced. However, the Districts' Maintenance Department has always used the Engineering Department's own designators for all data elements that have been, or could be, of common interest to both departments. There has never been any intent to change this policy. INTERFACE vs. INTEGRATION These terms have been used so casually and interchangeably by both professionals and non-professionals that they almost defy understanding because their real meaning has become blurred through such misapplication. This section will attempt to define these concepts in terms as understandable as possible. The purpose in doing so is to enable the reader to grasp the theory. The more difficult part will be shown later -- that the theory is sometimes very hard to apply in a specific case. By way of example, WordPerfect, a word processing software application which runs on Personal Computers, maintains documents which have been produced within WordPerfect in a unique format. This format is not directl readable by any other word processing software application. In a similar manner, Microsoft Word is a competing word processing software application which runs on Personal Computers. It, too, maintains documents which have been produced within Microsoft Word in it's own unique format. It is not possible for a user of Microsoft Word to directly read a document produced by WordPerfect, or vice versa. HOWEVER, it is possible to use an intermediate step to enable one application to read the documents produced by the other. Each application possesses the ability to read and store documents in a common, alternate format known as ASCII. Consequently, one can store a document written in WordPerfect in ASCII format and be able to read it with Microsoft Word and vice versa in a manner depicted in the attached Figure 1. The natural question which then arises is -- "Why use an exclusive format when a common format exists?" The answer is that all of the features which make WordPerfect and Microsoft Word unique are LOST when a document is stored or read in ASCII. Any special formatting, headers, footnotes, font instructions, tables, macros, indentation, kerning, etc. -- all of these are stripped away when the document is stored as an ASCII text. The user would painstakingly have to add all of this formatting again after having read the ASCII text in. The above is an example of "interfacing". Interfacing allows you to function, but not necessarily in the most efficient manner. "Integration" is more transparent. If, for example, WordPerfect and Microsoft Word were fully "integrated", the user would be able read documents into each other interchangeably without any reliance upon ASCII format. More importantly, there would be no functionality lost due to losing formatting or other special features. 4 Let us apply this analogy to Maintenance Management and Facilities records and Drawings. If a Maintenance crew is sent out to replace a line segment on an emergency basis and finds, for some reason, that the line they must install is a different diameter or material than the one they are replacing, the Maintenance Management System would provide for this new data to be updated in the data base. If Engineering's data base for modeling could not allow for "integration" and only allowed "interfacing", an intermediate batch file would have to be created so that the necessary extra steps would be taken to update the Engineering data base. In other words, it would require extra work, both manually and in the computer. However, if the data base for Maintenance Management and Engineering were integrated, the changes made on the Maintenance side would be reflected on the Engineering side automatically. Each would be working off of the most up-to-date data with little possibility for redundancy or conflict. But total integration is not necessarily cost-efficient. It is most desirable when there is a great need for data integrity in a common data base that is shared by multiple organizations utilizing interactive applications. The concept of integration does not apply with applications that are run in "batch mode" instead of interactively. (A typical example of a "batch" application would be payroll, which is run in a large batch and checks are produced all at once. An interactive application would be one where the user sits at a screen and obtains information immediately, such as when using a spreadsheet like Lotus 1-2-3 or Mircrosoft Excel.) Interfacing is the best solution possible for batch processing. However, batch processing is Mt the solution which staff recommends for the Districts for the needs of either the Engineering Department grr the Maintenance Department. The needs of both departments require a highly interactive and integrated approach. Job No. J-25-1 will provide interactive solutions for the Engineering Department's needs and will require data that is stored in a format compatible with such processing. This will also be true for Specification No. S-059 for Computerized Maintenance Management. HYDRAULIC MODELING During the course of interviewing the firms for Job No. J-25-1 at the meeting of May 6, questions concerning the Engineering Department's hydraulic modeling were raised. Statements were unfortunately made by vendors as well as members of the staff without benefit of all of the pertinent facts. Following further study and investigation, it was determined that: 1. The hydraulic modeling program used for the "2020 Vision" Master Plan is a proprietary software program written and owned by one of the firms (Boyle) present at the demonstrations of May 6. 2. This same modeling program which the Engineering Department bases 5 its hydraulic modeling projections only runs in batch mode. It is not an interactive model, such as those which were demonstrated by the other two of the three competing groups in the demonstrations of May 6. 3. The data which the Engineering Department had so painstakingly collected for the hydraulic model upon which the 1989 Master Plan is based is not in the Districts' possession in electronic format. Boyle Engineering feels that they can somehow put it back together again and deliver it to us in electronic format -- but it may take some time. 4. The following attributes were also discovered regarding this data: a. The data, in its electronic form, is stored in spreadsheet format (similar to Lotus 1-2-3 files). From this, the modeling software requires that the spreadsheet-formatted data be converted into what is called a "DBF" file. This format is based upon a software application made by a company that is no longer in business. b. The "DBF" format is not a format which would lend itself to integration as defined previously. It is a format which can only be modified by interfacing with a batch program. If the data were to be reformatted into the more modern format known as a Structured Query Language (SQL) Relational format, tight integration could be more easily attained. However, such a reformatted data base would require the use of a new modeling program written to access the new format. `..� C. The data for the Engineering Department's hydraulic modeling consists of essentially two parts: (1). Physical data relating to the collection system. This includes manholes, line segments, depth, slope, pitch, run, distance, material, diameter, and other physical characteristics. This physical data is reflected as an average over line segment distances between key nodes. It does not contain detailed data for each and every manhole, for instance. (2). Land Use data relating to geographic polygons. This data is obtained from the Planning Departments of each city in the Districts as well as the County for unincorporated areas. d. The data was collected during 1987 and 1988 to produce the "2020 Vision" Master Plan, which was published in 1989. The data 6 has not been updated since its collection. e. Taken as an aggregate, the information is being outdated at an estimated rate of 2-3% per year. This would mean that the data is 85-90% current at this point in time. In light of the type of data, its volume and the application, the status should be viewed as quite favorable. Nevertheless, in its foresight, the Engineering Department has plans to perform a major update to this data in approximately the next three years. The area of greatest commonality between the Engineering Department and the Maintenance Department would be the Physical data, as mentioned in part 4,c,(1) above. However, it must be pointed out that the Maintenance Department's Collection Facilities Division requires data in far greater detail than is required or provided by the Engineering Department's hydraulic data base. The Maintenance Department needs to track every single manhole, line segment, vault, pump, and other identifiable item of physical inventory which it has the task to maintain. The "skeleton" Physical data base which the Engineering model has is more than adequate for general long-range planning; but the Maintenance Department needs more detail. It is the intent of the Maintenance Department to use this same exact data as a "starting point" with the requisite missing detail to be filled in later, working from the Engineering Department's own detailed drawings and from field verifications. In the demonstrations made by firms to the Committee at the May 6 meeting, statements were made implying cost savings of a particular vendor's (RJN's) approach. In staff's opinion, cost savings can be demonstrated but are not exclusive from the other two vendors. The savings arise from the fact that the Maintenance Department will already be maintaining a precise level of detail for the Physical data base, once the "gaps" are filled in, as a part of Maintenance Management. The format of this data will be in a modem SQL Relational format. As such, this data will be in a format that can be readily accessed and updated in an integrated nature (inferring the previously stated definition), provided that there was an interactive modeling application to take advantage of this "open" format. Two of the short-listed firms (Lee & Ro / RJN and J.M. Montgomery) exhibited just such an interactive hydraulic modeling software package that could act upon data in this format. The other key element for hydraulic modeling at the Districts is the Land Use Data. This is the essential strength of a GIS and will be a critical focus of Job No. J-25.1. The Maintenance Management System has no need for Land Use data. The present "DBF" format for Land Use data in the existing model will not be compatible with modern GIS applications and will require reformatting to be able to work with an interactive model. The same two vendors (Lee & Ro/ RJN and J. M. Montgomery) which demonstrated such an interactive model at the interviews also showed their model's interaction with a modern GIS. It is staff's opinion that this approach that the 7 Engineering Department is pursuing for the Districts is the preferred approach. CONCLUSION: It is staff's opinion that there is no reason to delay the acquisition of RJN's Computerized Maintenance Management System for the Maintenance Department. The format of the data which RJN proposes to use is in a modern SOL Relational data base language and very open to use by virtually any of the vendors which have demonstrated their capabilities. The nature of the data shared between the Maintenance Department and Engineering does not lend itself in its present format to any form of integration by any vendor. The data will, of necessity, require reformatting to a more up-to-date format. (The considerations forcing this change in data format come from many sources and are not limited to the choice of a Maintenance Management solution.) When this new format is accomplished, there are a number of equally valid and successful ways that integration (as defined earlier) can be accomplished. Final determination of the best way for the Districts to achieve such integration will be the task of the firm that is awarded the contract for Job No. J-25-1, not the Computerized Maintenance Management System. 8 INTERFACING EXAMPLE I I ii Microsoft WordPerfect Word Special Fon W Special Fonfs Formattinfl Formatting sryies srylea Untlermcore Untlermcore Italics Italics etc. ii ii etc. ASCII Conversion i PLAIN TEXT PLAIN TEXT All Special All special Farmers are I I Formate are Gone i i Gone Reformat Reformat Add Spacial Code. Add Special Codes Tabs,etc. Taba, etc. it Finished Docume. Final Converted to Document WordPerfect Convertetl to Forma[ Microsoft Word Format Figure 1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS May 21, 1992 of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10844 Ews AVENUE STAFF REPORT PO BOX B127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92726.6127 OI41962-2411 Staff Observations of Firms for Job No. J-25-1 Computerized Facilities Record and Drawing System At the May 6, 1992 meeting of the Special Joint Works Selection Committee, presentations were made by three firms: 1. Lee & Ro Engineering/ RJN Group, Inc. (A Joint Venture). 2. John Carollo Engineers/ Boyle Engineering Corp./ Psomas (A Joint Venture). 3. James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineering, Inc. Following the 30-minute presentations made by these firms, the Committee and staff discussed their impressions. In the weeks since this last meeting, staff has had an opportunity to compare notes and deliberate further in an effort to come to a consensus on which firm best meets the Districts needs for this project. The purpose of this report is to present staff's observations. The chart on the last page gives a relative ranking for each of the three firms in 10 criteria. The ranking is '+" for the highest rank, V" for the middle rank, and '-" for the lowest rank. These rankings are based upon a consensus of the observations of staff members from Engineering Department and Information Services Division. There are a number of observations which are worth noting that do not fit neatly into the stated 10 criteria. These have been listed per firm: John Carollo Engineers/ Boyle Engineering Caro./ Psomas (A Joint Venture) Pros: Districts staff knows the team and the team has a good track record of responding to Districts' needs. Cons: Did not demonstrate up-to-date computer expertise in hardware or software development concerns. James M. Montgomery, Consulting Encineering. Inc. Pros: Demonstrated an obvious grasp of sophisticated state-of-the-art computer expertise. Emphasized a systematic approach to accomplish the project and critical points 1 for successfully completing the project. Only firm that emphasized the importance of staff training. Cons: Vast majority of experience in GIS/CAD is with Intergraph. This is a highly proprietary system only running on their own computer hardware, does not interface well with other hardware systems, and is extremely expensive. Lee & Ro Engineerin RJN Group. Inc. (A Joint Venture). Pros: Already have a developed facility management system (CASSWORKS). Proposed on-site trailer with Jim Hargraves and other senior officers to be dedicated 100% to the project. They have already developed the software tools to allow easy access to GIS software, CAD software, real-time modeling software and modern Relational SOL data bases from a graphics screen. Cons: Because of the last issue listed above (already have software written) objectivity in addressing District's needs as it relates to vendor-independence may be a question. 2 STAFF RANKING Criteria Boyle/ JCE JMM RJN/ Lee & Ro 1 Understanding of Scope of ✓ ✓ + Work 2 Demonstration applicable to ✓ ✓ + this project 3 Demonstrated database link + + while in graphics screen — 4 Demonstrated skill in + + database development — 5 Demonstrated skill in Facility ✓ ✓ + Mapping 6 Demonstrated skill in real- ✓ ✓ time Collection System — modeling 7 Demonstration of potential + + link to Computerized — Maintenance Management . . I System 8 Project Approach ✓ + 9 Familiarity with Districts + ✓ Facilities — 10 Support Services + ✓ + FINAL TALLY + 2 4 7 ✓ 4 5 2 4 1 1 3 RE: AGENDA ITEM N0, 12 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1 E6C4 ELLI6 AVENUE July 29, 1992 cO.BOX BI27 FOUNGIN VALLEY.OALIFORMA W72"127 17W 962.2411 REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE/FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEES Meeting Date: July 29, 1992 - 5: 0 p.m. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: - FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE: Present: Present: William D. Mahoney Joint Chairman Charles E. Puckett, Chairman Evelyn Hart Vice Joint Chairman James V. Evans Buck Catlin Past Joint Chairman Don Griffin Don R. Griffin Past Joint Chairman John M. Gullixson Norman E. Culver Past Joint Chairman Evelyn Hart Dan Griset Chairman, District 1 Iry Pickler Hank Wedaa Chairman, District 2 Peer Swan Sal A. Sapien Chairman, District 3 James Wahner Ruthelyn Plummer Chairman, District 5 James A. Wahner Chairman, District 6 Absent: Charles E. Puckett Chairman, District 7 Grace Winchell Chairman, District 11 Grace Winchell John M. Gullixson Chairman, District 13 Peer A. Swan Chairman, District 14 STAFF PRESENT: Don Roth County Supervisor J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Absent: Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering Gary Hasenstab, Director of Personnel Grace Winchell Chairman, District 11 Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of Roger Stanton County Supervisor Maintenance Bob Ooten, Assistant Director of OTHERS PRESENT: Operations Patti Gorzcyca, Financial Manager Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Ed Torres, Air Quality Manager John Shaw, General Counsel 's Office Steve Coma, Merrill Lynch Melissa Waters, Merrill Lynch 1) Capital Improvment Program, 1990-92 Series C Certificates of Participation Issue. The Districts' Series C Certificates of Participation issue, in an amount not to exceed $98,500,000, was approved by the Boards at their July 8th meeting. This is the third issue for partial funding of the Districts' ongoing facilities improvements and expansions pursuant to the long-range financial plan adopted by the Directors in 1989 as part of the 30-year "2020 VISION" Master Plan. Staff reported that the issue was originally scheduled for pricing and sale on July 21, 1992, but has been postponed for up to five weeks due to delayed processing of the "shelf registration" by the Securities and Exchange Commission (1 of 6) Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees Report July 29, 1992 - (SEC). Financial Guaranty Insurance Company (FGIC) is providing credit enhancement bond insurance for the Series C issue. FGIC is a private corporation and is, therefore, required to register with the SEC to provide the liquidity facility (line of credit) to the Districts. FGIC is seeking shelf registration which provides FGIC with an authorized allocation to provide liquidity to a number of issuers. Since the SEC has approved registrations on behalf of FGIC twice previously, FGIC felt that this approval should be accomplished fairly expeditiously. FGIC communicated with the SEC on July 16 and learned that the process could extend approval an additional four to five weeks. The Series C documents and offering statements are in near final form awaiting the outcome of the SEC decision. The Districts' financial team will be positioned to price and sell Series C immediately upon receiving the SEC decision. FGIC will be reducing its cost to provide the principal and interest policy for Series C, thereby saving the Districts and additional $100,000. Staff then reviewed the enclosed, bound report, updating the Committee on the status of the Series C transaction, addressing the following items: • Final Recommended Structure • Series C Allocation by District • Liquidity Facility Options • Projected Buyers of Series C COPs • Series C Financing Schedule Also enclosed is a news release prepared by FGIC regarding the Districts' upcoming Series C issue. The article will be published in FGIC's next quarterly newsletter. The FGIC article states, "A policy of full disclosure, Financial Guaranty has learned, is a primary indicator of strong and confident management team. In the case of the Districts, the disclosure provided concise information regarding management's performance in implementing stated policy goals and objectives. It also facilitated FGIC's tracking of the credit status of an existing FGIC-insured issue with the Districts. For the Districts, FGIC's credit enhancement for this issue resulted in an interest savings of approximately $2.5 million over the life of the bond issue." The Bond Bu er also mentioned our issue in their July 17th edition (see enclosed c ipp ng and will be featuring our Series C COP in an upcoming issue. The Bond Buyer has recognized the Districts' leading disclosure practices in severa�cTes. The staff observed that the Districts were awarded the National Federation of Municipal Analysts' Certificate of Recognition acknowledging our leadership role in full and continuing disclosure practices. The financial team believes this will realize a significant savings on both the market interest cost of borrowed funds to finance our capital expansion program, and also on the costs associated with credit enhancement, such as letter or line of credit and bond insurance. Since the FGIC line of credit was priced at 37 basis points, 10.5 basis points below the lowest cost bank bid of 47.5 basis points, the cost savings to the Districts associated solely with the line of credit is about $2 million over the life of the bond issue, assuming renewal of both liquidity facilities at current fees. (2 of 6) Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees Report July 29, 1992 2) Recommended Agreement with Fountain Vall 2y for Specific Plan of Site Use and Development for Reclamation Plant No. 1. Joint Chairman Mahoney reported that for some time the Executive Committee has been discussing the issue of whether conditional use permits can be required by the City of Fountain Valley for expansion of treatment facilities at Plant No. 1. It is the position of the City that their zoning ordinance applies to the Districts and that its provisions requiring a conditional use permit can and should be enforced. The City believes it has the right and obligation to do so. It is the Districts' position that our treatment facilities are not subject to conditional use permits because we are a regional governmental authority providing sewerage service to all cities in metropolitan Orange County, thus transcending Fountain Valley's authority which, if enforced, could effectively usurp the land use decision making authority of the governing bodies of the other 22 cities and the County of Orange in the Districts' service area. To avoid litigation over the issue, the Districts and the City have been discussing how to best resolve the matter. At the September 1991 Executive Committee meeting it was referred to an Ad Hoc Committee comprised of himself and Past Joint Chairmen Catlin and Griffin. The Ad Hoc Committee presented an interim report to the Executive Committee in January 1992, at which time the Joint Chairman was authorized and directed to propose to the City of Fountain Valley that the City and Districts enter into an agreement setting forth a mutual understanding for utilizing a specific plan process pertaining to the site use and development at Reclamation Plant No. 1. The Committee, General Counsel and staff have been continuing to work with the City of Fountain Valley to resolve this issue and have recently concluded the negotiations successfully. Enclosed is a report (green) of the Ad Hoc Committee recommending approval of the proposed agreement for Specific Plan of Site Use and Development Between the City of Fountain Valley and the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Regarding Reclamation Plant No. 1. The Joint Chairman and General Counsel then reviewed the basic provisions of the proposed agreement. Committees' Recommendation: The Executive Committee and Fiscal Policy Committee recommend approval of the proposed agreement with the City of Fountain Valley. (3 of 6) Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees Report July 29, 1992 3) 1992 Annexation Fees. Staff reported that one-time annexation fees are charged the owners of all properties which desire to annex to the Districts to receive sewerage service. A higher fee is charged for those properties for which a tax-exchange agreement cannot be negotiated with the County (a result of Proposition 13/AB 8). The fees for 1991-92 pursuant to the resolutions adopted by those Districts with annexable territory are: Per Acre Fee W/Tax W10 Tax District Exchange Exchange 2 $2,922 $3,908 3 3,154 4,139 5 3,054 4,084 7 2,902 3,883 11 4,843 5,830 The annexation fee resolutions approved in 1991 provide for an annual increase in the per acre fees on July 1 based upon the change in the Engineering News Record (ENR) Construction Cost Index for the preceding March to March time period. The intent of this section of the resolutions is to provide for automatic fee adjustments each year to reflect the increasing costs of u constructing sewerage facilities. Based upon the 6% change in the ENR Index from 502.96 in March 1991 to 533.18 1n March 1992, the fees for 1992-93 would be calculated to be: Per Acre Fee W/Tax W Tax District Exchange Exchange 2 $3,098 $4,143 3 3,344 4,388 5 3,237 4,329 7 3,076 4,116 11 5,134 6,180 Staff pointed out that during the 1992-93 budget process the Boards decided not increase the sewer use fees and sewer connection fees for 1992-93. These are fees charged for the annual use of the sewer system, or the one-time connection to the sewer, for properties currently within the Districts, boundaries. However, the Boards did not consider annexation fees for 1992-93 during the budget process. A literal reading of the 1991 resolutions does not allow the flexibility of not increasing the annexation fees unless the Boards take a specific action deferring the automatic increase. Staff, therefore, sought direction from the Committees on whether the annexation fees should be N%./ increased for 1992-93. (4 of 6) Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees Report July 29, 1992 Committees' Recommendation: Following a discussion of the annexation fees the Executive Committee and Fiscal Policy Committee concluded that given the current economic climate, and for the same reasons that the Directors decided not to Increase sewer use and connection fees for 1992-93, Districts 2, 3, 5, 7 and 11 should forego increasing their annexation fees for 1992-93. 4) Review of Districts' Policies and Procedures for the Selection and Procurement of Professional Engineer n Architectural Environmental Land Surveying and Construction management Services. Following a discussion by the Directors at the July 8th Board Meeting regarding the Districts' policies and procedures for selection of professional consulting services, the Joint Chairman referred the matter to the Fiscal Policy for review. Enclosed is a copy of the Boards' Resolution No. 90-43, Establishing Policies and Procedures for the Selection and Procurement of Professional Engineering, Architectural , Environmental , Land Surveying and Construction Management Services (gray). The Directors' previous discussions have centered on the provisions for sole source procurements as set forth in Sections 5 and 6, Page 8 of the Resolution. The Committee entered into a discussion of the policies and procedures resolution during which Directors pointed out that the resolution provides that before an agreement can be negotiated for a sole source professional services �..i engagement, authority must be sought from and granted by the Boards. The Committees determined that the current resolution provides the proper checks and balances and that there was no need to revise the current policies and procedures. During further discussion that followed, Past Joint Chairman Griffin reiterated the need to continue the policy and procedures approved separately by the Directors in 1991 concerning establishment of appropriate insurance levels for professional services agreements on a case by case basis to assure that the amount of insurance is relevant to the scope of work. 5) Status Re ort re En ine Re air for Central Power Generation System at Treatment lant No. Job -1 - and Purchase of Spark-Ignited Engines for Us—e—i—nuentral Power Generation bystems, Job No. J-1 -A. The Committee Members received a verbal status report (see enclosed pink memorandum from General Counsel) on the damage assessment for the five engines at the Huntington Beach Job J-19-2 Central Power Generation Job facility. Investigations are now underway to determine the amount of damage sustained by the engines as well as the reason for the damage and to assign appropriate responsibility. (5 of 6) Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees Report July 29, 1992 6) Report re Digester Gas Com ressors Purchased from Pennsylvania Process s. J-19-Compressors re Jobs No an P - 4-1. In January, staff reported to the Board that the Districts had incurred extra installation costs for the placement of compressors at the Plant 2 building as part of the Central Power Generation System, Job J-19-2, project. With the assistance of Legal Counsel , staff determined that it had a potential legal claim for these costs. Accordingly, a demand was made on the prime contractor for Job No. P-1-34-1 who was under a contractual obligation to deliver assembled compressors ready for installation. A change order credit was negotiated with Ziebarth & Alper, contractor for Job No. P1-34-1, in the amount of $33,000 in favor of the Districts. Staff is satisfied with this credit to address the installation problems encountered and advised the Committees that the amount would be included in Change Order No. 23 to Job No. P1-34-1 and presented to the Boards at the regular August meeting. A second issue relates to a potential claim against Penn-Cooper for damages arising from late delivery of the compressors to the project site. Staff reported to the Executive Committee that it is still researching this question. JWS:sc Enclosures (6 of 6) I3u ear Thy Bond Bonds Since 189I The authority on Municipal Ing disclosure,"John Cassidy.vice Analysts Federation Head Analysts president of Financial Guaranty's Sans Issuers' List Doubles contmued tram front page announcing group. said Ina pay en[ aeon selected that the an c had Ill.: the Florida Municipal Poser httn selected to back an upcoming For Market Disclosure Agency: the Greater Orlando. Fla.. s100 million Issue of variable-rate Aviation Authority:the Intermoun- certificates of participation by the By Vickv Sumas taln Power Agency In Utah: the County Saturation Districts of Or- WASHINGTON — The National North Carolina Eastern Municipal ange County.Calif.Financial Guar- Federation of Municipal Analysis Power Agency: the North Carolina anty said credit enhancement for has nearly doubled its list of bond Municipal Power Agency No. One: the Issue resulted In an interest. issuers that have pledged to mend the Piedmont Municipal Power rate savings of roughly 82.5 million the ersfed that haation's rigorous standards Agency in South Carolina: and the over the life of the bond Issue. for secondary market disclosure, Prince William County Park Au- Meanwhile,the upcoming survey Chairwomen Victoria disclo re, thority In Virginia. by the analysts federation drew an Chanced yesterday. The additions bring to 22 the to- angry response from at least one Some analysts have voiced iris- let number of cities, counties. and municipal official. who said that ration that the group's call for Im- other entities that have adopted some Issuers have already been proved disclosure has not c met more resolutions or provided written providing excellent secondary mar- ptoveddi disclosure nse.But amajor bond In- statements from authorized offi- ket disclosure and that Improve. surer has Indicated that I[ andcon In- cials pledging to provide regular au- ments by the rest will happen only era improved disclosure a top factor deed financial statements, com- when they have a prim Incentive. wsImproveddisrim. prehenswe financial reports if "Issuers have been painted as :en deciding . Alice[.. o! munlcf- prepared. and other key credit In- the bad guys for not being respon- pal s. Wes for F�wtor f Jones er formation about their outstanding sive:' said John Gunyou, commis- Co. In St.research for said the !allowing bonds. stoner of the Minnesota Depart- Co., St. Louis. were added the following Issuers also must pledge to send men[ of Finance and chairman of st lust: we eaddecities f to the letters- ers-Fort periodic credit Information to a rat- the Government Finance Officers �t''alh. Tex.. and Gass Valley, Ing agency for rated deals.And they Association's committee on gov- Ca11L: the Village of Buffalo Grove. must state In the Introduction to of- ernmental debt and fiscal policy. IIL:CGHMetlllagcal Cen[erfa Sterling, flcial statements that they have -'Why should an tastier respond if Neme ant to ANAL YSTS Pore 2n made these commitments. the market will always pay him.re- Peaaraag-ma The announcement comes amid gardlem?" Mr. Gunyou continued. growing frustration among ana- There's no financial Incentive. Ivsts about what they view as the Until Investors stop buying paper sluggish response by Issuers to or attach a penalty to that. people calls for improved secondary mar- are not going to be responsive. ket disclosure. Federation officials GFOA Is encouraging people to do said last week they are putting the It.Now the other side of the market final touches on a broad survey has to start responding." that will go to the group'a 800 Mr. Gunyou was critical of a re- members this summer to gauge Im- cent federation recommendation provements In the area. that Issuers declare in official state. To date. no hovers have reported ments whether they will or will not payinga premium for bonds strictly supply ongoing disclosure. "NFMA because of the quality of secondary is hung up on the negative." he market disclosure.nor have any In- said. "Some of us have been doing Buren reported giving a discount an excellent Job of disclosing for exclusively for that reason. Market years.But there is no 1price)differ- observera say such statements are entlation." unlikely because of the many fac- Richard Clccarone. chairman of ton that go Into price de[errnl- the federation's standards and nations. practices committee. responded to But the Financial Guaranty In. Mr. Gunyou's charges In a tele- sumnce Co. last week clearly Inch- phone interview yesterday. "We're crated It Is rewarding Issuers that In this together." he said. Provide ongoing disclosure by re- Talking to the association's ducing the cost of providing credit members is "like singing to the enhancements. choir," he added,noting that many Pricing "was based on outstared- association members had already ing operating performance. strung been providing ongoing secondary legal covenants and detailed ongo- market disclosure. ❑ The Bond Buyer - Friday, July 17, 1992 FGICw Orange County Selects FGIC For Financial Expertise And Unique Product Mix When the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California were planning an unusual issue of $100 million of variable rate debt this summer, FGIC was ready with an exclusive mix of three product solutions. With the help of FCIC's financial engineering expertise, the issue could come to market with credit enhancement. By closely examining the Districts' specific needs, Financial Guaranty was able to provide a principal and interest policy, debt service reserve fund surety bond policy and the industry' s only liquidity facility for the subordinated lien variable debt issue. The effort was indicative of FGIC' s long-standing commitment to creatively approaching the needs of its clients. Full Disclosure Plays Important Role FGIC' s detailed analysis of the issuer' s credit quality was assisted considerably by the Districts' full disclosure policy. In fact, pricing of all three FGIC products was based on outstanding operating performance, strong legal covenants and detailed on-going disclosure by the Districts' (FGIC had previously insured $117 million of the Districts' Series 1991 Certificates) . A policy of full disclosure, Financial Guaranty has learned, is a primary indicator of a strong and confident management team. In the case of the Districts' , the disclosure provided concise information regarding management's performance in implementing stated policy goals and objectives. It also facilitated FGIC's tracking of the credit status of an existing FGIC-insured issue with the Districts' . For the Districts' , FGIC' a credit enhancement for this issue resulted in an interest rate savings of approximately $2.5 million over the life of the bond issue. By working with FCIC to consider financial guaranty options coupled with A policy of full disclosure, the District secured the most effective and efficient access to the markets. For more information about this and other FGIC-insured transactions in the utilities field, please contact John Cassidy, Vice President, at (212) 607-3065. r r Presentation to: r r County Sanitation Districts r of Orange County Executive Committee/ Fiscal Policy Committee r Series C Structuring Summary & District by District Allocation r r r July 20, 1992 r r `I County Sanitation Districts of Orange County ..✓ Series C Structuring Summary & District by District Allocation Table of Contents Final Recommended Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Series C Allocation by District . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 Liquidity Facility Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 Projected Buyers of Series C CON . . . . . . . . . . .4 Series C Financing Schedule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 Appendix Series C Debt Service Schedules . . . . . . . . . . Tab A .r County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 1992 Series C Financing Structuring Summary JULY 1992 FINAL RECOMMENDED STRUCTURE STRUCTURE Interest Rate Bond Type: Variable Rate Sale Date: July 21, 1992 Transaction Size: $98,500,000 Term: 25 years Lien: Subordinate Lien Structure: Certificates of Participation Credit Enhancement: Bond Insurance &5 Year Line of Credit Provided By FGIC Underlying CSDOC Rating: Standard & Poor's: AA— (received week of 07/06192) Moody's: Aa .. Series C Rating: Standard & Poor's: AAA (same as rating of insurer) Moody's: Aaa Reserve Fund: 10% of Par Amount Capitalized Interest: None Derivative Products: None PAGE 1 ,r County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 1992 Series C Financing District by District Summary JULY 1992 r PERCENT PAR RESERVE CONSTRUCTION AVO.ANNUAL TOTAL DISTRICT ALLOCATION AMOUNT FUND FUND 1 DEBT SERVICE DEBT SERVICE ALL DISTRICTS 100.000% $98,500,000 $9,850,000 $87,031,565 $8,106,542 $202,663,547 r DISTRICT #1 10.152% $10,000,000 $1.000,000 $8,835,692 $822,999 $20,574,979 r DISTRICT #2 27.919% $27,500,000 $2,750,000 $24,298,153 $2,263,248 $56,581,193 r DISTRICT #3 34.010% $33,500,000 $3,350,000 $29,599,568 $2,757,047 $68,926,181 r DISTRICT #6 7.107% $7,000,000 $700,000 $6,184,984 $576,099 $14.402,486 DISTRICT #7 7.614% $7,500,000 $750,000 $6,626.769 $617,249 $15,431,235 DISTRICT #11 13.198% $13,000,000 $1,300,000 $11,486,399 $1,069,899 $26,747,473 ,� (Q NkT OEA]BR--NYYIFABMN�E EMMIMUB C£1�6�fOR TOTAL OPOBB FYXD OF 0ffi�YY m oEer QRVIC£.M ..AT. r r PAGE 2 LIQUIDITY FACILITY OPTIONS FINAL PRICING National Westminster BANK Barclays Bank FGIC Insurance Union Bank of Switzerland UPFRONT FEE Letter: $15,000 + 12.5 BP Line: No Bid Line: 10 BP ANNUAL FEE Letter: 47.50 BP Line: 35.00 BP Line: 37.00 BP LONG—TERM CREDIT RATING Aa1/Aa1/Aaa -- AA+/AA+/AAA Aaa - - AAA TERM Letter: 5 Years Line: 3 Years Line: 5 Years SELECTED FACILITY: FGIC, DUE TO LONGER TERM, HIGHER CREDIT RATING & LOWER ANNUAL COST AS COMPARED TO COMPARABLE 5 YEAR LOC OFFERED BY NAT WEST SYNDICATE AT 47.5 BASIS POINTS • RENEWABLE AT 37 BP FOR AN ADDITIONAL 5 YEAR TERM PAGE 3 - County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Projected Buyers of Series C - Floating Rate Issuance Retail Investors 5.0% Bank Trusts 1.0% Band Funds 60.0% Corporations 34J % PACE 4 As of 7/9/92 �e COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 1"2 Series C Financing r Financing Schedule r \� May 1"2 June 1992 July 1992 § M T W T F 5 1 M T W T F S. S M T W T F a 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 r 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ,�7 18 19 20 21 22 23 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 /31 25 26 27 28 29 30 28 29 30 26 27 28 29 30 31 r Date Event Responsibilities r Completed -On-site presentation to Moody's Ali Parties -On-site presentation to Standard&Poor's All Parties Completed -Fiscal Policy Committee packages mailed CSDOC,ML Completed -Comments back from Rating Agencies All Parties Completed - Fiscal Policy Committee Meeting(Informational) Completed -Variable rate documents distributed BC -Draft of variable rate POS distributed ML,UC -Commitment Letter Consent Determination UC,KPMG Completed -Credit Enhancement&Trustee RFPs received CSDOC,ML r Completed -Board workshop for historical COP CSDOC,ML,Board overview&discussion of derivatives(5:30 P.M.) Completed -Board meeting Board r /Completed -Review variable rate documents A0 Parties Completed -Fiscal Policy Committee Meeting to approve structure -Revised documents distributed BC,UC,ML 07/02/92 -Working group meeting to review documents All Parties 07/08/92 -Board meeting to approve documents Board r -Revised documents distributed 07/13/92 - Final comments on POS All Parties 07/13/92 -Mail Report to Executive Committee CSDOC,ML 07/15/92 -POS distributed ML,UC -Draft Comfort Letter received KPMG 07/20/92 -Preliminary Pricing(Pricing Call) CSDOG ML -Pre-closing All Parties -Final OS printed 07/21/92 -Variable rate Final Pricing and Sale All Parties r -Final Comfort Letter Received KPMG -Closing All Parties 07/29/92 -Executive Committee/Fiscal Policy Committee CSDOC,ML ,r Pricing Status Meeting O8/12/92 -Review of transaction with Board CSDOC,ML,Board r, aooc rswyswww or,m.xa,os�wq cow: 000c ewamoa.aw. rx M,MM sec o:wa.xmivxane swum BC as •ww T. awev,aa awer:a w: uw.w y.me m. wrm: xvxa rd sma< PAGE 5 r l l` [. [ [ [ LYNCH CO.vvvvv.....vm-............. ==_07/14/92 ... = / f A 000 Certificates of participation S\ Cou i:c nitatlon Districts of Orange Canty 1992-93 Series C Schedule 1: Swrcea-B U9ea SOURCES OF FUNDS Per Amount of Bonds: 98,500,000 Plus Premiw / Lesa Discount: 0 ACerued Interest: 0 Gross Production: 98,500,000 UGES OF FUNDS Deposit to Calstruetlon fund: 87,031 565 Insurance Premlw: 728:179 Upfront Insurance Fee: 98 500 Reserve Fund: 9,850:000 Coate of Issuance: 250,coo Undervrit irg Spread: 541:750 Deposit of llccrued Interest: 0 Rounding: 6 98,500,000 KEY DATES A ASSUMPTIONS Dated: 07/21/92 OeliverY: 07/21/92 First Interest: 08/01/92 Fir Maturity: 08/01/93 First Caretructi on Draw: 08/01/92 Last Maturity: 08/01/17 Underwriting Spread: $5.50 VARIABLE RATE ASSUMPTIONS Upfront Insurance Fee:c-� ve 0.100X I,rcuronce Prcmiw (1): 0.300% Pass rve Fund: 10.000X Daily Remarketing Fee: 0.125% Arbitrage TIC: 6.590% Alt-in gl C: 6.678% Average Life in Years: 16.27 NOTES (v) Debt Service Amortized at 6.50% (1) Premiw Based on Debt Service Asswing 9.00% Rate [ [ ( I I [ I I I I l ( ! l 1 f 1 1 1 1 MERRi LI` V 8 CO_______________ 0=/14/92_ 598,5000., __ Cert(f icet es of Participation County Senitati on Districts of Orange Courty 1992-93 Series C Schedule 2: Proposed Debt Service ALL DISTRICT 100.000% 6.5902 Amual DSRF Reserve Fund Net Total Net Present Date Rate Yield principal Interest Total Earni Ms Applied to DS Total Accrued Value .......... ........ ........ .......... .......... .......... .......... ............ .......... .......... .......... 1 08/01/92 6.500% 6.SC0% 177,847 177,847 18,032 159,815 3,036,490 159,528 2 02/01/93 3,201,250 3,201,250 324,575 2,876,675 2,779,896 3 05/01/93 6.500% 6.500% 1,620,DOD 3,201,250 4,821,250 324,575 4,496,675 7,320,700 4,206,774 4 02/01/94 3,148,600 3,148,600 324,575 2,824,025 2,557,680 5 08/01/94 6.500% 6.500% 1,730,000 3,148,600 4,878,600 324,575 4,554,025 7,321,825 3,992,942 6 02/01/95 3,092,375 3,092,375 324,575 2,767,800 2,349,375 7 08/01/95 6.500% 6.500% 1,845,000 3,092,375 4,937,375 324,575 4,612,800 7,320,638 3,790,550 8 02/01/96 3,032,413 3,032,413 324,575 2,707,838 2,154,171 9 08/01/96 6.500% 6.500% 1,970,000 3,032,413 5,002,413 324,575 4,677,838 7,321,65D 3,602,655 10 02/01/97 2,968,388 2,968,398 324,575 2,643,813 1,971,188 11 08/01/97 6.500% 6.500% 2,105,000 2,968,388 5,073,388 324,575 4,748,813 7,324,213 3,427,697 12 02/01/98 2,899,975 2,899,975 324,575 2,575,400 1,799,625 13 08/01/98 6.500% 6.500% 2,245,000 2,899,975 5,144,975 324,575 4,820,400 7,322,M8 3,260,922 14 02/01/99 2,927.013 2,827,013 324,575 2,502,438 1,638,855 15 08/01/99 6.50D% 6.500% 2,395,000 2,827,013 5,222,013 324,575 4,897,438 7,322,038 3,105,033 16 02/01/2000 2,749,175 2,749,175 324,575 2,424,600 1,488,166 17 08/01/2000 6.500% 6.500% 2,555,000 2,749,175 5,3D4,175 324,575 4,979,600 7,321,163 2,958,909 18 02/01/2001 2,666,138 2,666,138 324,575 2,341,563 1,346,985 19 00/01/2001 6.500% 6.500% 2,730,000 2,666,138 5.396,138 324,575 5,071,563 7,324,400 2,824,352 20 02/01/2002 2,577,413 2,577,413 324,575 2,252,838 1,214,582 21 08/01/2002 6.5COX 6.500% 2,910,000 2,577,413 5,487,413 324,575 5,162 1138 7,321,100 2,694,669 22 02/01/2003 2,482,838 2,482,838 324,575 2,158:263 1,090,539 23 08/01/2003 6.500% 6.SOD% 3,105,000 2,482,11M 5,587,8338 324,575 5,263,263 7,320,613 2,574,613 24 02/01/2004 2,381,925 2,351,925 324,575 2,057,350 974,293 25 08101120" 6.50D% 6.50D% 3,315,000 2,381,925 5,696,925 324,575 5,372,350 7,321,963 2,462,982 26 02/01/2005 2,274,188 2,274,188 324,575 1,949,613 865,297 27 08/01/2005 6.500% 6.500% 3,540,000 2,274,188 5,814,168 324,575 5,489,613 7,324,175 2,358,731 28 02/01/2006 2,159,138 2,159,138 324,375 1,934,563 763,114 29 03/01/2006 6.500% 6.50D% 3,775,000 2,159,138 5,934,138 324,575 5,609,563 7,321,438 2,258,945 30 02/01/2007 2,036,450 2,036,450 324,575 1,711,875 667,373 31 08/01/2007 6.500% 6.500% 4,030,000 2,036,450 6,066.450 324,575 5,741,875 7,322,775 -2,167,057 32 02/01/2008 1,905,475 1,9D5,475 324,575 1,580,900 577,618 33 08/01/2008 6.500% 6.500% 4,300,000 1,905,475 6,205,475 324 575 5,850,900 7,322,050 2,080,177 34 02/01/2009 1,765,725 1,765,725 324:575 1,441,150 493,498 35 08/01/2009 6.500% 6.500% 4,590,000 1,765,725 6,355,725 324,575 6,031,150 7,323,125 1,999,386 36 02/01/2010 1,616,550 1,616,550 324,575 1,291,975 414,639 37 08/01/2010 6.500% 6.500% 4,900,000 1,616,550 6,516,550 324,575 6,191,975 7,324,700 1,923,825 38 02/01/2011 1,457,300 1,457,300 324,575 1,132,725 340,707 39 08/01/2011 6.500% 6.500% 5,225,000 1,457,300 6,682,300 324,575 6,357,725 7,320,638 1,851,305 40 02/01/2012 1,287,488 1,287,488 324,575 962,913 271,446 41 DO/01/2012 6.500% 6.500% 5,575,00D 1,287.488 6,862,488 324,575 6,537,913 7,319,638 1,784,249 42 02/01/2013 1,106,300 1,106,300 324,575 781,725 206,533 43 08/01/2013 6.5CO% 6.500% 5,950,000 1.106,300 7,056,300 324,575 6,731:725 7,320,075 1,721,799 44 02/01/2014 912,925 912,925 324,575 588,350 145,684 45 08/01/2014 6.5CO% 6.500% 6,350,000 912.925 7,262,925 324,575 6,938,350 7,320,325 1,663,230 46 02/01/2015 706,550 706,550 324,575 381,975 88,644 47 08/01/2015 6.500% 6.500% 6,780,000 706,550 7,486,550 324,575 7,161,975 7,323,600 1,609,047 48 02/01/2016 486,200 486,200 324,575 161,625 35,153 49 0/01/2016 6.500% 6.5C0% 7,235,000 486,200 7,721,200 324,575 2,128,379 5,268,247 5,264,868 1,1D9,282 50 02/01/2017 251,063 251,063 254,441 0 (3,378) - (689) 51 08/01/2017 6.500% 6.500% 7,725,000 251,063 7,976,063 254,441 7,R1,622 0 0 0 .......... .......... .......... .......... ............ .......... .......... .......... 98,500,OOD 104,163,547 2D2,663,547 16,106,505 9.850,000 176,707,D43 176,707,043 87,823,046 [ 1 [` [ [ [ [ "Sell eeeCO:vvvavvv vvvv : 07/14/92_ j;nCert if lcates of Participation C49ulm2%p� anitatian Districts of Orem County 199E-93 5ar 1 as C Schedule 2: Proposed Debt Service DISTRICT CT N1: 10.0.152% 6.590% Annual DSRF Reserve o DS Tote Total Net Present Data Rate Tleld Pr ir¢Ipel Interest Total Earnings Applied to DS Total ---rued Value SUMMARY .......... ........ ........ .......... .......056 ......___. .....1,831 ....._____.. ......__25 ---708,273 16,196 2 08/01/93 725,000 489,467 32,952 292,D48 112,223 3 02/01/93 6.500% 6.500% 164,<67 319,655 319,655 32,952 286.703 743,218 259 663 Per Construction 70,000,000 4 08/01/96 319,655 495,289 32,95E 462,338 405 375 Reserve fud: 8,835,092 6 02%01 95 6.500% 6.SOD% 175,635 313 947 313,947 32,95E 280,995 765,333 238,515 Costs o{{fiawrce: 1 025,381 7 08/O1/95 6.500X 6.500% 187,310 313,94T 501,256 32,95E 468,305 743,212 384,827 Underwr itlm Spread. 55,000 8 02/01/96 307,859 307,859 32,952 274,907 218,698 Total DST; 20,574 979 9 08/01/96 6.500% 6.500% 200,000 307,859 507,859 32,952 474,907 743,315 365,752 Total net DS! 17:939:794 10 02/01/97 301.359 301,359 32,952 265,407 200,121 11 08/01/97 6.5ODX 6.50D% 213,706 301.359 515,065 32,952 482,113 743,575 347,990 12 02/01/98 294,414 294,414 32,952 261,462 182,703 13 08/01/98 6.50OX 6.SOD% 227,919 294,414 522,332 32,952 459,381 743,435 331,058 14 02/01/99 287,OD6 287,OD6 32,952 254,055 166,361 15 08/01/99 6.500X 6.500% 243,147 28T,OD6 530,154 32,952 497,202 743,354 315,232 16 02/01/Z0000 279,104 279,104 32,952 246,152 151,085 17 08/01/200D 6.500% 6.500% 259,391 279,I04 538,495 32,952 505,543 743,265 300,397 18 02/01/20DI 270,674 270,674 32,952 237,722 176,750 19 08/01/20DI 6.500% 6.5ODX 2T7,157 270,674 547,831 32,952 514,879 743,594 286,736 20 D2/01/2002 261,666 261,666 32,952 228,714 123,308 21 08/01/2002 6.500% 6.500% 295,431 261,666 557,098 32,952 524,146 743.259 273,570 22 02/01/2003 252,065 252,065 32,952 219,113 110,715 23 08/01/2OD3 6.500% 6.500X 315,228 252.065 567,293 32,952 534,341 743,209 261,382 24 02/01/2UD4 241.820 Z41,820 32,952 205,868 98,912 25 08/01/2004 6.500% 6.500% 336,548 241,820 378,368 32,95E 545,416 743,346 250,049 26 02/01/2005 230,882 230:882 32,952 197:930 87,847 27 O8/01/2CD5 6.50D% 6.50OX 359,391 230,88E 590,273 32,952 557,321 743,571 239,465 28 02/11/2006 219,20E 219,202 32,952 186,250 T7,473 29 08/01/2006 6.500% 6.500% 383,249 219,20Z 602,451 32,952 569,499 743,293 229,335 30 02/01/2007 206,746 206,746 32,952 173,794 67,754 31 OB/D1/2007 6.50071 6.500% 409,137 206,7G6 615),BBS 32,952 582,931 743,429 220,006 33 0B/O1%2008 6.500% 6.500% 436,548 193.449 69 997 32,952 597,046 743,355 211,IN 34 02/01/2009 179.261 179,261 32,952 146,310 50,10t 35 OB/01/2009 6.500% 6.500% 465,990 179.261 665,251 72,95E 612,700 743,465 202,98 36 02/01/2010 164,117 164,117 32,952 131,165 42,095 37 OB/01/2010 6.500% 6,500% 497,462 164,117 661,579 32,952 628,627 743,624 195,31E 38 02/01/2011 147,949 147,949 32,952 114,997 34,590 39 08/01/2011 6.500% 6.500% 530,457 147,949 678,406 32,952 645,454 743,212 107,950 40 12/01/2012 13D,709 130,709 32,952 97,758 27,558 41 08/01/2012 6.500% 6.500% 565,990 130,709 696,699 32,952 663,747 743,110 181,142 42 02/01/2013 112,315 112,315 32,952 79,363 20,968 43 08/01/2013 6.500% 6.500% 604:061 112:375 716,376 32,95E 653,424 743,155 174,802 44 02/01/2014 92,653 92,683 32,952 59,731 14,790 45 08/01/2014 6.500% 6.500% 644,6TO 92,683 737,353 32,952 704,401 743,160 168,856 46 02/01/2015 71,731 71,131 32,952 38,TM 8 999 47 08/01/2015 6.500% 6.500% 658:325 71,731 760,056 32,952 727,704 743,SIX 163,355 48 02/01/2016 49,360 49,360 32,952 11 609 5566qq 49 08/01/2016 6.500% 6.500% 734,518 49,360 783,878 32,952 216,086 534 840 534.497 111: 6 50 02/01/2D17 25,489 25,489 25,831 0 1} 51 OB/DI/2017 6.500% 6.50D% 784,264 25,489 809,753 25,839 783,914 tx07 0 ,t 01 10,000,000 10,574,979 20,574,979 1,635,185 1,000,000 17,939,794 17,939,794 8,916,044 I i I` I I I I I I I I l a I r I I I I I l I MEANT L� _eC00714/92 .6ee_e a .... . ......... 527,499 00 CartifieeTo of Partle ipation CountYy,�renitstion Districts of Orange County 1992-93 Series C Schedule 2: proposed Debt Service ..S............... ...........n........ DISTRICT 02: 27.919%919X DSRF Reserve Fund Met Total et Present Date Rate Yield Principal Interest Total Earnings applied to DS Total Accrued value SUMWRY 1 08/01/92 6.500% ;.SOD% 0 49,657 49,653 5,034 44,618 847,751 44,538 8 08701 95 6.500% 6.500% 452,284 893,750 1,346,0344 90,617 1,051 90,6 ,255,417 2,043,850 1,17/4,480 Per amount: 27,500,000 4 02/01/946 02/01/95 863,353 86,353 0,617 772,736 655,917 CostsroftIssuance: 24 269,797 98,153 5 05/O1/94 6.500% 6.500% 482,995 879,051 1,362,046 90.6 1,271,428 2,044,164 1,11 ,781 Reserve Fund: 2,750,000 7 08/01/95 6.500% 6.500% 515,102 863,353 1,378,455 90,617 1,287,838 2,043,833 1,058,275 Underwriting Spread: 151,250 8 02/01/% 846,613 846,617 90,617 755,995 601,418 Total DS: 56,lei 193 9 OB/011/96 6.500% 6.50D% 550,000 846,613 1,396,613 90,617 1,305,995 2,044,116 1,005,817 Total net DS: 49,335,077 10 02/01/97 828,73E 828,73B 90,617 738,120 550,732 11 OB/01/97 6.500% 6.500% 587,690 828,738 1,416,428 90,6 7 1,325,811 2,044,831 956,971 12 02/01/98 009,638 8W,638 90,6�7 719,020 502,433 13 08/01/98 6.5C0% 6.500% 626,777 809,63B 1,436,414 90,61111117 1,345,797 2,044,447 910,410 15 O8/01799 6.500% 6.500% 668,655 789,267 1,457,922 90;617 1,367,305 2,D44,224 i866,887 16 02/01/2000 767,536 767,536 90,617 676,919 415,484 18 02/01/200 6.500X 6.500% 717,725 744,7153 1 744 353 90;6U 1 653,736 2,OU,979 376,062 19 08/01/2001 6.500% 6.50D% 762,183 744,953953 1,506,536 90719,582 ,617777 1,628,965 2,044,887 339:097 20 02/01/200222 08/01R00 6.500% 6.500% 812,437 719,582 1,532,019 90�6�7 1 602�561 2,043,962 752.319 4 665 23 08/01/2003 6.500% 6.500% B66,878 693,178 1,560,056 9D,617 1,469,439 2,043,826 719 801 24 02/01/2004 665,004 665,004 90,617 574,387 272'C08 25 08101120" 6.500% 6.50OX 925,508 665,0W 1,590,512 W,617 1,499,095 2,044,203 687,634 26 02/01/2085 634,925 634,925 W,6 7 544,308 241,580 28 02/01/2006 6.500X 6.SO0% 988,725 602,805 1 602,805 90,617 1,512,188 2,044,821 213;052 29 05/01/2006 6.50DX 6.509% 1,053,934 602,805 1,656,739 90,617 1,566,122 2,044,056 630,670 30 02/01/2007 56B,552 568,552 90,61 477,935 166,322 31 08/01/2007 6.500% 6.500% 1,125,127 568,552 1.693,679 90,617 1,603,062 2,044,430 605,016 32 02/01/2008 531,985 531,985 90,617 441,368 161,016 33 08/O1/2008 b.50D% 6.500% 1,200,508 571,985 1,7l2,i93 90,617 1,641,876 2,044,227 580,760 34 264 02/01/20D9 492,969 492,969 90,617 402,352 137,779 35 O8/01/20W 6.50D% 6.500% 1,281,472 492,969 1,774,441 W,617 1,683,824 2,044,527 558,2% 36 02/01/2010 451,321 651,321 90,617 360.704 115,762 77 08/01/2010 6.50D% 6.500% 1,760,02D 451,321 1,819,341 90,617 1,728,724 2,044,967 577,1W 78 02/01/2011 406,860 406,860 90,617 316.247 95,121 39 08/01/20112 6.SUD% 6.500% 1,458,756 406,860 1,865,617 90,617 1,774,999 2,043,837 516,862 40 02/01/2012 359,451 359,451 90,617 268.833 75,784 41 03/01/2012 6.500% 6.50D% 1,556,472 359,451 1,915,923 90,617 1,825,306 2,047,554 498,140 42 02/01/2017 308,865 308,865 90,617 218,248 57,662 43 0/01/2013 6.500% 6.50D% 1,661,168 308,865 1,970,033 90.6 7 1,879,416 2,043,676 480,705 44 02/01/2014 254,978 254,878 90.617 164,260 40,673 45 08/01/2014 6.500% 6.5CO% 1,772,$43 254,878 2,027,720 90,617 1,937:103 2,0,3,746 464,754 46 02/01/2015 197,266p0 197,260 90,617 106,643 24,74B 48 027012016 6.500% 6.500X 1,892,893 188;720 2 185;261 90;617 1,9495D,1M 2,046,660 G49, 24 49 08/01/2016 6.500% 6.500% 2,019,924 135,741 2,155,665 90,617 593,577 1,471 475 1,470,5/1 3W 11 51 08/01/2017 6.500% 6.50DX 2:156,726 70:094 2,226:019 TO392 2,156:427 t%07 0 t1985 .......... .......... .......... .......... ............ .......... .......... .......... 27,500,000 29,081,193 56,581,193 4,496,116 2,750,000 49,735,077 49,335,077 24,519,256 [ 1 [ H [ [ [ l 1 H 1 ( [ fl fl l 1 I 1 MERRIL 4 6 CO. 07/16/92 /` S33,50 4er[ifieetes�of Perti sips[ion C9untY(rotation Districts of Creme county \\\ 199E-93 Sarin C Schedule 2: Proposed Debt Service DISTRICT 03: 34.010% »>sev�=xwvvvveev 6.590% Annual DSRP Reserve Fund Net Total Net Present Date Rate yield Principal Interest Total Earnings Applied to DS Total Accrued Value SINMARy .......... ........ ........ .......... .......... .......... .......... ............ .......... .......... .......... »sese.se»=a=seevee:=��ew.epe 1 08/01/92 6.500% 6.500% 0 60,486 60,486 6,133 54,353 1,032,715 54,256 2 02/01/93 1,088,750 1.068,750 110,368 978,362 945,447 3 08/01/93 6.500% 6.500% 550,964 1,098,750 1,639,714 110,3Be 1,529,326 2,489,781 1,430,730 Per Anuu:t: 33,500,000 4 02/011/94 1,070,844 1,070,844 110,388 960,455 869,871 Construction fund: 29,599,568 6 02/01/95 6.50D% 6.500% 585,376 71,051;7�21 1,051,721 1f0;388 1 941,333 2,490,166 1,3�,06 Costs o//F ssuance: 3 385,025 7 08/01/95 6.5002 6.5001 627,487 1;051,721 1.679,209 110,758 1,568,820 2,489,760 1,289,172 Underarlti g Spread. 184,250 8 02/01/96 1,031,328 1,031,328 110,388 920,940 732,637 Total DS: 68,926:181 9 08/01/96 6.500% 6.500% 670,000 031,328 1,701,328 110,3Be 1,590,940 2,490,1" 1,225,268 Total net DS: 60:099,094 10 02/01/97 1 OD9,553 1,0D9,557 110,388 899,165 670,606 11 O8/01/97 6.500% 6.500% 715,914 1;009,553 1,725,667 110,388 1,615,078 2,490,976 1,165,765 12 02/01/98 986,286 986,286 110,768 875,890 612,055 13 08/01/98 6.500% 6.500% 763,528 986,286 1,749,814 110,788 1,639,425 2,490,508 1,109,045 14 021011" 961,471 961,471 110,7B6 551,083 557,377 15 08/01 99 6.500% 6.500% 814,543 961,471 1,776,014 110,SB8 1,665,626 2,490,236 1,056,026 16 02/01/2000 934,999 934,999 110,188 824,610 506,134 17 08/01/2000 6.500% 6.500% 668,959 934,999 1,803,958 110,1B8 1,693,570 2,489,939 1,006,330 18 02/01/2001 906,757 9D6,757 110,358 796,369 458,112 19 OB/01/2001 6,500% 6.500% 928,477 906,757 1,835,235 110,SB8 1,724,846 2,491.040 960,567 20 02/01/2002 876,582 876,582 110,188 766,194 413,081 21 08/01/2002 6.500% 6.500% 989,695 876,58E 1,866,277 110,788 1,755,589 2,489,917 916,461 22 02/01/2003 844,41 844,417 110,788 734,028 370,894 23 08/01/2003 6.500X 6.50D% 1,056,01S 844.411 1,900,432 110,788 1,790,044 2,489,752 875,630 24 02/01/20D4 B10,096 810,D96 110,388 699,708 - 331,355 25 08/01/2004 6.500% 6.500% 1,127,437 810,W6 1,937,533 110,IB8 1,827,144 2,490,211 937,664 26 02/O1/2005 773,455 773,455 110,788 663,066 294,289 27 08/O1/2005 6.50n 6.500X 1,203,959 773,455 1,977,414 110,SB8 i,867,026 2,490.963 802,208 28 02/01/2006 734,326 734,326 110,388 623,938 259,536 29 08/01/2006 6.500% 6.500% 1,283,883 734,326 2,018,209 110,388 1,907,821 2,490,032 768,271 30 02/01/2007 692,600 692,600 110,388 582,211 226,975 31 08/01/2007 6.500% 6.500% 1,370,609 692,600 2,063,209 110,3BB 1,952,820 2,490,487 737,019 32 02'01/2008 646,055 648,055 110,388 537,667 196,449 33 08/01/2008 6.SUD% 6.50n 1,462,437 648,055 2,110,491 110,3S8 2,000,103 2,490,240 707,471 74 02/01/2009 600,526 600,526 110,388 490,137 167,840 35 OB/01/2009 6.50D% 6.500% 1,561,066 600,526 2,161,592 110,388 2.051,203 2,490,606 679,994 36 02/01/2010 549,791 549,791 110,388 439,403 141,020 37 08/01/2010 6.500% 6.500% 1,666,497 549,791 2,216,289 110,388 2,105,900 2,491,142 654,296 38 02/01/2011 495,630 495,630 110,5S8 385,242 115,875 39 08/01/2oil 6.500% 6.500% 1,777,030 495,630 2,272,660 110,388 2,162,272 2,489.760 629,632 60 02/0 /2012 437,876 437,876 Ito' ful 321,458 92,319 41 08/O1/2012 6.500% 6.500% 1,896,066 437,876 2,333,942 110,388 2,223,554 2,489,420 606,826 42 02/01/2013 376,254 376,254 11U,388 265:866 70,242 43 08/01/2013 6.5009 6.500% 2,023,604 376,254 2,399,858 110,388 2,289,470 2:489:569 585:587 44 02/01/2014 310,487 310,487 110,388 200:099 49,547 45 08/01/2014 6.500% 6.500% 2,159,645 310,487 2,470,132 110,388 2,359,747 2,489,654 565,667 46 02/01/2015 240,299 260,299 110,788 129,910 30,148 47 08/01/2015 6.500% 6.500% 2,1O5,B88 240,299 2,S46,187 110,388 2,435,799 2,490,768 547,239 48 02/01/2016 165,357 165,357 110:358 54,969 11,956 49 08/01/2016 6.500X 6.500% 2,460,635 165,357 2,625,992 110,388 723,079 1,792,524 1,791,350 377 434 50 02/01/2017 85,387 85,387 86,562 0 (1,175) 1239) 51 08/01/2017 6.500% 6.500% 2,627:284 85.387 2,712:671 85,750 21626,921 0 0 0 77,500,000 35,426,181 68,926,181 5,477,087 3,350,000 60,099,094 60,099,094 29,868,912 r I [ i t [ t i e a t [ [ a t a e t 17,0001, ertiffeates of�participation e2e County, Cam- Sanitation Districts of Orange County 1W2-ul Serlee C Schedule 2: Proposed Debt Service DISTRICT A6:---�7 107X ----��--- ----------- 6.590% Annual DSRF Reserve Fund Net Total Net present Date Rate Yield principal Interest Total Earn,rigs, Applied to DS Tata1 Accrued Value SLm RY .......... "'..... ........ ..........0 .......... ----- ._... ----- ............ .... .."" ---- "__... 1 02/01/93 6.500% 6.500% 0 27,639 27,500 1,281 04,434 215,791 97,556 2 08/01/93 227,500 227,500 23,066 319,561 298,956 3 02/01/93 6.500% 6.500% 115,127 223,75 342,627 23 066 200,692 520,253 181,764 per Amami: T,000,000 4 08/01/94 223,758 227,77503 23,066 323.636 283,762 Construction Fund Fuld: 6,700,000 5 02/01/94 6.500X 6.500% 122,%L 219,763 346,763 23 066 196,696 520,333 166,961 Reserve Fund: 717,766 7 08/01/95 6.500% 6.500% 131,117 219,763 350�879 23;0 6 327 813 520,248 269 379 Underwrit lnp Spread: 38;500 8 02/01/96 215,501 215,501 23,066 192,435 153,006 Total DS: 14,402:486 0%9 08/01/% 6.50 6.500% 140,000 215,501 355,51 231066 332,435 520,320 256,026 Total net DSi 12.558,020 10 02/01/97 210,951 210,961 23,066 187,885 140,084 11 08/01/97 6.500% 6.500% 149,5% 210,951 760,545 27,066 737,479 520,502 243,593 12 02/01/90 206,090 206,090 27,066 183:023 127,892 13 08/01/98 6.500% 6.5C0% 159,543 206,090 765,633 23,066 342,567 520,405 231 761 14 02/01/99 200,904 2C0,904 23,066 177:838 116:467 15 M/01 99 6.500% 6.500% 170,203 200,904 371,107 23,066 748,041 520,348 220,662 16 02/01/2500 195,373 195,373 23,066 172,307 105,759 17 08/01/2000 6.50D% 6.500% 181,574 1%,373 376,946 23,066 353,880 520,286 210,278 18 D2/01/2C01 189.472 189,472 23,066 166,405 95,725 19 18/01/2001 6.500% 6.5002 194.010 189,N2 383,482 23,066 760,416 520,516 200,715 20 02/01/2002 183,166 183,166 23,066 160,100 86,315 21 08/01/2002 6.50D% 6.500% 206,802 183,166 389,968 23,066 366,902 520,281 191,499 22 02/01/2003 176,445 176.445 23,066 153.379 77,500 23 08/01/2003 6.500% 6.50D% 220,660 176,445 397,105 23,066 374,039 520,247 182,967 24 02/01/2004 169,274 169,274 23,066 146,208 69,238 25 08/01/20% 6.5C0% 6.500% 235,554 169,274 404,858 23,066 351,791 520,343 175,034 26 02/01/2005 161,617 161,617 23,066 138,551 61,493 27 08/01/2005 6.500% 6.500% 251,574 161,617 413.191 23,066 390,125 520,500 167.626 28 02/01/2CD6 153,641 153,441 23,066 130,775 54,231 29 08/01/2006 6.500% 6.500% 268,274 153,641 421,715 27,066 398,649 520,305 160,534 30 02/01/2007 146,722 144,722 23,066 121,656 47,428 31 08/01/2007 6.500% 6.50D% 286,396 144,722 431,118 23,066 408,052 520,400 154,0% 32 02/01/2008 135,414 135,414 23,066 112,348 41,049 33 08/01/2008 6.500% 6.500% 305,584 135,414 440,WB 23,066 417,932 520,349 147,830 34 02/01/2 09 125,483 125,483 23,066 102,417 35,071 35 08/01/2009 6.500% 6.500% 326,193 125,483 451,676 27,066 428,610 520,425 142,088 36 02/01/2010 114,882 114,882 23,066 91,815 29,467 37 08/01/2010 6.500% 6.50D% 348,223 114,982 463,105 23,066 440,039 520,537 136,719 38 02/01/2011 103,564 103,564 27,066 80,498 24,213 39 08/01/2D11 6.500% 6.50D% 371,320 103,564 474,B84 2],066 451,818 520,248 131,565 40 02/01/2012 91,497 91,497 27,066 68,430 19,291 41 08/01/2012 6.500% 6.50D% 396,193 91,497 487,689 23,066 464,623 520,177 126,799 42 02/01/2013 78,620 78,620 23.066 55,554 14,678 43 08/01/2013 6.500% 6.500% 422,843 79,620 501,463 23,066 478,397 520,20: 122,361 44 02/01/2014 66,818 64,873 23,066 41,312 10,353 45 08/01/2014 6.500% 6.500% 451,269 64,878 516,147 23,066 493,081 520,22 118,199 46 02/01/201S 50,212 50,212 25,066 27,145 6,300 47 08/01/2D15 6.SC0% 6.500% 481,827 50,212 S32,039 23,%6 508.973 520,459 114,349 48 02/01/2016 34,552 34,S52 23,066 11,486 2,498 49 08/01/2016 6.500% 6.500% 514,162 34,552 548,715 23,066 151,091 374 557 374,312 78,867 50 02/01/2017 17,842 17,842 18,088 0 (246) (50) 51 08/01/2017 6.500% 6.500% 548,%5 17,842 566,027 17,918 548,909 0 0 0 7,000,000 7,402,486 16,402,686 1,146,466 700,000 12,558,020 12,558,020 6,241,265 f I I I I I I I I I I I l l 1 I l l I MERRIL� e5 CO........... es a ../ease. 57,500,000 Certificates of Partf9ipati on Cantuy Sanitation Districts of Orange Canty 992-93 Series C Schedule 2: Proposed Debt Service DISTRICT 07: 7.614X 6.590% A.[ Date Rate yield Princf I Int¢rest Total EarnDSRF Reserve Fund Net Total Net Present pe M Applied to DS Total Accrued Value SU1061RT .......... ........ ........ .......... .......... .......... .......... ............ .......... .......... .......... sese»=.an coo eaeseee�e= 1 08/01/92 6.500% 6.50D% 0 13,542 13,542 1,314 12,169 231,205 12,147 2 02/01/93 243,750 243,750 24 219,036 211,667 3 05/01/93 6.500% 6.SC0% 123,350 243,750 367,100 24,,716 714 342,386 557,414 720,313 Par Anent: 7,500,000 4 02/01/94 239,741 239,741 24,714 215,027 194,747 Construction 1": 6,626,769 5 08/01/94 6.500% 6.500% 131,726 239,741 371,467 24,714 346,753 557,499 304,031 Reserve Fund: 750,coo 6 02/01/95 235,460 235,460 24,714 210,746 178,886 Costs of Issuance: 19,036 7 08/01/95 6.500% 6.500% 140,482 235,460 375,942 24,714 351,228 557,409 288,621 Underwriting Spread: 41,250 8 02/01/96 230,894 230,894 24,714 206,101 164,023 Total DS: 15431,235 9 08/01/96 6.500% 6.500% 150,000 230,894 380,894 24,71L 356,181 557,486 274,314 Total net DR: 13:455,021 10 02/01/97 226,019 226,019 24,714 201,306 150,090 11 08/01/97 6.500% 6.500% 160,279 226,019 3B6,299 24,714 361,585 557,681 260,992 12 02/01/98 220,810 220,810 24,714 196,096 137,027 13 OB/01/98 6.500% 6.500% 170,939 220,810 391,749 241714 367,036 557,576 248,294 14 02/01/99 215,255 215,255 24,714 190,541 124,786 15 O8/01/99 6.500% 6.500% 182,360 215:255 397:615 24,714 372,901 557,516 236,424 16 02/01/2000 209,328 209,328 24,714 154,614 113,314 i7 08/01/2000 6.500% 6.500% 194,543 209.328 403.871 24,714 379,157 557,449 225,298 8 02/01/2001 203,005 203,005 24,714 178,292 102,562 19 08/01/200 6.5ODX 6.500% 207.868 203,005 410,873 24,714 366,160 557,695 215,052 20 02/01/2002 196,250 196,250 24,714 171,536 92,481 21 08/01/2002 6.500% 6.500% 221,574 196,250 417,823 24,714 393,109 557,444 205,118 22 02/01/2003 169,049 189,049 24714 164,335 93,036 23 08/01/2003 6.500% 6.500% 236,421 189,049 L25,470 24.714 400,756 557,407 196,031 24 02/01/2004 181,365 181,365 24,714 156,651 74,184 25 0/01/2004 6.500% 6.500% 252,411 181,365 433,776 24,714 409,062 557,510 187,537 26 02/01/2005 173,161 173,161 24,714 148,448 65 B86 21 OB/01/2005 6.500% 6.500% 269,543 173,161 442,705 24,714 417,991 557,678 179:599 28 02/01/2006 164,401 164,401 24.714 139.658 58,105 29 08/01/2006 6.500% 6.5CD% 287,437 164,401 451,838 24,714 427,124 557,470 172,001 70 02/01/2007 155,060 155,060 24,714 130,346 50,815 31 08/01/2007 6.500% 6.50D% 306,853 155,060 461,912 24,714 437,199 557,572 165,004 32 02/01/2008 145,081 145,087 24,714 120,373 43,981 33 08/01/2008 6.500% 6.500X 327,411 145,087 472,498 24,714 447,78864 557,517 158,389 34 02/01/2009 134,446 134,446 24,714 109,732 37,576 35 08/01/2009 6.5001 6.5001 349,492 134,446 483,938 24,714 459,225 557,598 152,237 37 08/oi/2010 6.500% 6.500% 373,096 123 090 496,184 Z M 471,470 SS7,T18 146,484 39 OB%01%2011 6.500% 6.500% 397,843 110;962 600;805 2<;71L 484;eo1 557,L09 146�962 40 02/01/2012 98,032 98,032 24.714 73,318 20,668 41 0 8/01/2012 6.500% 6.500% Q4,492 98,032 522,524 2<,714 497,811 557,333 135,856 42 02/01/2013 84,236 84,236 24,714 59,522 15,726 43 08/01/2013 6.500% 6.500% 453:046 84,236 537,282 24,714 512,565 :57,366 131,101 44 02/01/2014 69,512 69,512 24.714 44,798 11,093 45 08/01/2014 6.500% 6.500% 483,503 69,512 553,015 24,714 528,301 557.385 126,642 46 02/01/2015 53,798 53,798 24,714 29,OB4 6,750 47 OB/01/2015 6.5C0% 6.500% 516,244 53,798 570,042 24,714 545:3288 557,635 122,516 48 02/01/2016 37,020 37,020 24,714 12,3D6 2,677 49 08/01/2016 6.500% 6.500X 550,888 37.020 587,909 24,714 161,884 401 311 401:04: 94,500 50 02/O1/2017 19,116 19,116 19,379 0 (263) (54) 51 08/01/2017 6.500% 6.500% 588,198 19,116 607,314 19,198 588,116 0 0 0 .......... .......... .......... .......... ............ .......... .......... .......... 7,500,000 7,931,235 15,431,235 1,226,214 750,000 13,455,021 13,455,021 6,687,070 t i t//(//( t t t 1 1 2 I F t t 1 t t t 2 t 1 MERRIt S ... 07e14e92e / S12,999 v Certificates of Participation ` l 1�2'�7S9pifeslC Districts of prone County Schedule : Proposed Debt Service ...............v.""....................... DISTRICT R11 13.198% DSRF Reserve EW Met Total Mat Present Date , Rate yield Principal Interest Total Earnings Applied to DS Total Accrued value SURMARY ........ ........ .......... .......... .......... .......... ............ .......... .......... .......... .................................. 1 08/01/92 6.500% 6.500% 0 23,472 23,472 2,380 21,092 400,755 21,054 2 02/01/93 422,500 422,50D 42,837 379,663 366,890 3 08/01/93 6.500% 6.500% 213,807 422,500 636,307 42,637 593,470 966,184 555,2D9 Per AnGAIt: 13,000.000 4 02/01/94 415,551 415,551 42,BS7 372,714 337,562 Coastruction Fund: 11,486,399 5 08/01/94 6.500% 6.500% 228,325 415,551 643,876 42,837 601.039 966,332 526,987 Reserve Fund: 1,300,000 6 02/01/95 408.131 408,131 42,837 365,293 310.010 Coate ut issuance• 32,995 7 OB/01/9955 6.500% 6.500% 243,503 408,131 651,633 42,837 608,796 966,176 500,276 Underar t N Spread: 71,500 B 02/01/96 400,217 400,217 42,837 357,380 284,307 Total OS: 26,7q,477 9 08/01/96 6.SOOX 6.500X 260,000 400,217 660,217 42,837 611,380 966,309 475,477 Total net DS: 23,322,037 10 02/01/97 391,767 391,767 42,837 348,930 260,157 11 18/01/97 6.500% 6.50D% 277,817 391,767 669.584 42,837 626,747 966,647 452,386 12 02/01/98 382,738 382,738 42,837 339,901 237,514 13 08/01/98 6.500% 6.500% 296,294 382.73a 679.032 42,837 636,195 966,466 430,375 14 02/01/99 373,108 373,108 42,877 330,271 216,296 16 02/01//2000 6.500% 6.500% 316,091 362:835 3362,835 42, 37 319,998 966,360 196 410 78 02%01/2001 6.500% 6.500% 337,208 7362,835 }700,043 42;837 657,206 w'245 3mm 19 08/076 1/2001 6.500% 6.500% 360,305 351,076 912,181 42,837 669,343 966,672 372,757 20 02/01/2002 340,166 340,166 42,B37 297,329 160,300 21 00/11/2002 6.500% 6.500% 384,061 340,166 724,227 42,B37 681,390 966,237 355,642 22 02/01/ 00 32 ,684 327,684 42,837 284,847 143,929 23 08/0112103 6.500% 6.50D% 109,797 327,686 737,181 12,837 694,644 966,172 339,797 25 0,012004 6.500% 6.500% 437,513 314,366 751,818 42;837 2709,041 966,350 325,064 26 02/01/2005 700,147 300.147 42,B17 257,309 I1b 202 27 08/01/2005 6.500% 6.500% 467,208 300,147 767, 55 42,877 724,517 966,642 311 305 28 02/01/2006 284,962 284,962 42,877 242,125 100,716 Z9 08/01/2006 6.500% 6.500% 498,223 284,962 787,186 42,837 740,348 966,281 2",135 30 02/0 /2001 268,770 268,770 42,837 225,933 88,080 31 08/01/2007 6.50DX 6.500% S31,878 268,T70 800,648 42,877 757,8/1 966,458 2866,008 33 0701/20DO 6.500% 6.500% 567,513 251.404 818,997 42 837 776,159 966,362 274,541 34 02/01/2009 233.040 233,040 42;837 1",203 65,132 35 08/01/2009 6.500% 6.500% 605,787 233,040 838,827 42,837 795,989 966,504 263,878 36 02/01/2010 213.352 213,352 42,877 170,514 54,724 37 05/01/2010 6.500% 6.500% 646,701 213.352 860,052 42,837 817,215 966,712 253,906 38 02/01/2011 192,334 192,534 42,837 149,497 44,966 39 DB/01/2011 6.500X 6.500% 689,594 192.334 881,928 42,831 839,D91 966,176 244,335 40 02/01/2012 169,922 169,922 42,837 127,085 35,825 41 08/01/2012 6.500% 6.500% 735,787 169,922 905,709 42,837 862,872 966,064 235,485 42 02/01/2013 146,009 146,009 42,837 103,172 27,258 43 08/01/2013 6.500% 6.50D% 785,279 146,009 931,288 42,837 888,451 966,101 227,243 44 02/01/2014 120,485 120,488 42,837 T7,650 19,227 45 08/01/2014 6.500% 6.50D% 83"071 120,488 958,559 42,831 915,721 966,134 219,513 46 02/01/2015 93,250 93,250 42,837 50,413 11,699 47 08/01/2015 6.500% 6.500% 894,822 93,250 988,073 42,837 945,235 966,567 212,362 48 02/01/2016 64,169 64,169 42.837 21,331 6,640 50 08/0 /2017 6.500% 6.500% 954:873 }6}4,1}6g9 1,0y199,04472 742,8337 280,598 695t607i 695,151 146,t9S) 51 08/01/2017 6.500% 6.500% 1,019,543 33:135 1,039;A 33,278 1,019,i02 9 D 0 .......... .......... .......... .......... ............ .......... 17,000,000 13,767,475 26,747,473 2,125,437 1,300,000 23,322,037 23,322,037 11,590,921 [ H t 1 H 1 I [ 1 A l t I 1 1 A H [ I {( LTXCX g CO. 07e 14/92 ft�, 0 000 Certificates of Verticiptian .. ..6 CantY Sanittation Districts of Orange Canty 1992-93 Ser les C Scheduta 3: SC C tluctlon rugd Drsae Period BegalancBe 11coimeposi[ Site Interest Draa gErdl Ne ---------- ---------- ---------- --""------ ..._------ ---------. ____-__--- 1 08/01/92 0 87,031,565 3.5206% 85,112 7,377,380 79,739,297 2 09/01/92 79,739,297 3.5240% 234.169 7,377,380 72,596,086 7 10/01/92 72,596,086 3.51240% 213,192 7,377,380 65,431,898 4 11/01/92 65,431,898 3.5240% 192,153 7,377,380 58,246,671 5 12/01/92 58,246,671 3.5240X 171,052 7,377,380 51,040,344 b 01/01/93 51,040,344 3.5240X 149,890 7, 77 3BB00 43,812.853 7 02/01/93 43,812,853 3.5240% 128,665 7,3780 36,SK,138 8 O3101/93 76,564,138 3.5240X 107,377 7,377 380 29,294,135 9 04/01/93 29,294,135 7.5240X 86,028 7, 77.380 22,CO2,783 10 OS/01/93 22,002,783 3.52405 64,615 7,377;38D 14,690,018 17 06/0:/93 14,690,018 3.5240% 43,140 7,377,380 7,355,T78 12 07/01/93 7:355,778 3:5240% 21,602 7,377,380 0 87,071,565 7,496,995 88,528,560 Construction Fund Yield (s.e. conpo"IM): 3.550% S RESOLUTION NO. 90-43 ESTABLISHING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE - `� SELECTION AND PROCUREMENT OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURAL, ENVIRONMENTAL, LAND SURVEYING AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE SELECTION AND PROCUREMENT OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURAL, ENVIRONMENTAL, LAND SURVEYING AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2 , 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE AND ESTABLISH THE FOLLOWING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE SELECTION AND PROCUREMENT OF ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURAL, ENVIRONMENTAL, LAND SURVEYING AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES: �✓ Section 1: Selection of Professional Technical Consultants. In the selection of a firm or individual professional technical consultant, as defined in Section 2, it is recognized that no two individuals or firms have equal training, experience, skill, capabilities or work loads to meet the demands of any contemplated project. For purposes of this Resolution, "firm" shall mean any individual, firm, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity permitted by law to practice the profession of architecture, engineering, environmental services, land surveying, or construction project management. Evaluation and selection of a consultant firm will include but not be limited to the following: A. The firm shall be of high ethical and professional standing, its members being of good moral character, and it shall be prepared to submit references from persons of known repute. B. The principal and other responsible members of the firm must be registered in the State of California, as required by law. 1 F C. A principal member of the firm's staff must have at least -- - ten years' recent experience in responsible charge of work of the type involved in the project. D. At least two additional members of the firm's staff must have at least five years' experience in responsible charge in the field, or fields, required by the project. E. The firm shall be capable of performing the work within the prescribed time limitations considering the current and planned work loads of the firm. F. If all other factors are equal, preference shall be given to a local based firm when more than one firm is being considered. G. A firm selected must certify to having an affirmative action employment program. Section 2: Definition of Professional Technical Consultants. A. Professional Technical Consultants are those individuals or firms providing engineering, architectural, environmental or land surveying services which are those professional services associated with research, development, design and construction, alteration, or repair of real property, as well as incidental services that members of these professions and those in their ' employ may logically or justifiably perform, including studies, investigations, surveys, evaluations, consultations, planning, programming, conceptual designs, plans and specifications, cost estimates, inspections, shop drawing reviews, sample recommendations, preparation of operation and maintenance manuals, and other related services. Services for product testing are excluded. B. Services covered hereunder include architectural, engineering, environmental, land surveying, construction management and related services. C. A Professional Technical Consultant is an individual, partnership or corporation (or any combination thereof) engaged to provide services as described in Section 2.A. Section 3: Scope of the Protect. A. For every project approved by the Board(s) and for which outside services are required, the District staff shall develop a comprehensive scope of work. 2 B. The scope shall define the extent of the services, the time required, and shall develop a maximum fee for the services sought. C. The maximum fee amount shall be kept confidential until a selection has been made, but, along with the scope of work, will be available to any Director upon request. Section 4: Selection of A Professional Technical consultant. A. Projects where services are estimated to be less than $25,000.00. 1. Projects where the maximum professional fees are estimated to be less than $25, 000.00 are usually specific, small projects normally requiring specialization in one or two fields of endeavor. 2. Staff shall consider at least three qualified firms and shall select that firm which appears best qualified for the project. 3. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 4 .A.2, in the event the proposed work is considered continuation or specialized services as described in Section 5, "Continuation of Services", or Section 6, "Specialized Services", upon written authorization by the General Manager, negotiations may be limited to the sole qualified firm deemed desirable for providing said services. 4. Negotiations for compensation for the work shall be conducted between the firm and staff members appointed by the General Manager, or their designees. 5. A requisition for acquisition of services shall be forwarded to the purchasing office listing the firms considered, the reasons for choosing the firm selected and shall certify that the negotiated fee for compensation to the firm is reasonable for the services requested and will not result in excess profits for the firm. 6. The purchasing office shall process the requisition in accordance with the purchasing policy established by the Boards of Directors. 7. The evaluation of the firm's qualifications and the fee negotiations will not be made public but will be available to any Director upon request. 3 . 8. In cases where the aggregate amount of services is � expected to exceed $10,000.00 .and a project may be funded through a federal grant program, all applicable provisions of federal law, including but not limited to 40 CFR, 35.937, shall apply to the solicitation of proposals and negotiations for professional technical consultant service. B. Projects where services are estimated at greater than $25, 000.00. 1. Public Notice. a. . Appropriate public notice shall be given by publication of a notice of request for qualifications in professional journals or publications of general circulation. b. The notice shall request written statements of qualification only. C. As an alternative to the notice by publication, the District shall maintain a list of firms previously determined to be qualified based on demonstrated competence and notice of the request for qualifications shall be mailed to those firms who have the capabilities and specialization to qualify for the project. 2. Screening Committee. A Screening committee comprised of a minimum of three staff members designated by the General Manager shall select at least three firms who appear fully and best qualified, based on demonstrated competence, for the project. 3. Proposals. a. Staff will prepare written requests for proposals setting forth the scope of work and other information necessary for the qualified firm to properly prepare and submit a proposal. Proposals shall be solicited from the three firms deemed most qualified. b. Proposals submitted shall: (1) Acknowledge the scope of the project and extent of the services required. 4 (2) Include a description of the firm's - qualifications for performing the proposed work, including a -current financial statement evidencing the ability to satisfactorily perform all the items proposed and required. (3) In the case of a proposal for construction management services, each firm shall provide evidence that its personnel that will carry out on-site responsibilities have expertise and experience in construction project design review and evaluation, construction mobilization and supervision, bid evaluation, project scheduling, cost-benefit analysis, claims review and negotiation, and general management and administration of a construction project. (4) Include past performance records of the firm. (5) Demonstrate the firm's capabilities to complete the work within the time allotted. (6) Identify the specific key personnel to be assigned to the project. (7) Provide an estimate of the number of hours involved in each aspect of the scope of work for such personnel. (8) Be accompanied by a sealed fee proposal estimate which shall not be opened until the firm is selected as being qualified. Thereafter, it shall be the basis, for procurement negotiations. The form of the fee proposal shall be as described in section 6(b) and (c) below. (9) Contain a conflict of interest disclaimer. (10) Provide any other information required to properly evaluate the firm' s qualifications and familiarity with the types of problems applicable to the project. 5 • ' Y 4. Selection Committee Members. a. Joint Works. (1) The appointed Selection committee for Boards of Directors and a minimum of one staff member appointed by the General Manager, or their designees. (2) At the discretion of the Joint Chairman, additional Directors may be appointed to the Committee to assist in the consideration of proposals for specific projects. b. Individual Districts. (1) Districts with three-member boards: The Selection Committee of a District with a three-member Board shall be comprised of the Chairman of the District and a minimum of one staff member appointed by the General Manager, or their designees. (2) Districts with more than a three-member Board: The Selection Committee of a District with more than a three-member _ Board shall be comprised of the Chairman and Chairman Pro Ten of the District and a minimum of one staff member appointed by the General Manager, or their designees. 5. Review and Selection. a. The Selection Committee shall review each proposal and the qualifications of each firm with due consideration of office location, reputation in the professional community, experience, both generally and specifically on similar-type projects financial standing, number of qualified personnel and their availability for the project, quality of references, work load and other factors relevant to the project being considered. b. The Selection Committee, upon completion of their evaluation of all proposals, shall determine those firms deemed to be fully qualified to provide the services sought by District based on their demonstrated competence and qualifications. 6 C. The Selection Committee, upon making a determination of the- fully qualified firms _. shall open the sealed fee proposal of the qualified firms. The Selection Committee shall thereafter rank the firms considered, in order of desirability, based upon the qualification of each, as described in Paragraph 5a above, together with the estimated fee proposal. 6. Procurement and Negotiation of Agreement. To determine the firm to be selected and the compensation for the services sought, the following procedures will be strictly adhered to: a. The Selection Committee will, at its discretion, invite the firm that is considered to be the best qualified to appear before the Committee. b. The firm shall present, in writing, to the Selection Committee, a proposal for fees associated with the services. The proposal for compensation shall be presented in sufficient detail to enable the Selection Committee to adequately ascertain the level of effort associated with the scope of work and to determine whether the firm has thoroughly `J identified the efforts associated with the services and thoroughly understands the work required. C. The basis of the fee shall be: Cost plus a fixed fee with a maximum amount, a per diem rate(s) with a maximum amount, or a lump sum (fixed) fee. d. If it is the decision of the Selection Committee to use methods for compensation other than the lump sum or cost plus a fixed fee with a maximum, or the per diem rates with a maximum, justifications for this decision shall be made by the Selection Committee in their recommendation to the Board(s) of Directors for the services. e. The Selection Committee shall review the compensation requested by the firm which shall be compared with the maximum fee as previously established. 7 V� f. The final negotiated fee, as recommended to the Board(s) of Directors, shall be certified by ^' the Selection Committee as reasonable for the services requested and not resulting in excessive profits for the firm. g. If agreement is not reached, the negotiations should be terminated and similar interviews should then follow with the next-ranked firm. h. All such negotiations shall be on a strictly confidential basis and in no case shall the compensation discussed with one firm be discussed with another. Section 5: Continuation of Services. A. In some instances where a qualified firm has satisfactorily completed one phase in the development of a project and the Board(s) determine that it is in the best interests of the District(s) to retain the same firm for subsequent phases of related work, the Selection Committee may be authorized to proceed directly with negotiations with that firm for the additional work. B. This situation may arise when a firm has completed a feasibility report or a master plan report and the services for said work are satisfactory to the Board(s) and the procedure of examining other firms for subsequent �J phases is not deemed necessary. C. In the event that satisfactory negotiations for price cannot be concluded under these circumstances, negotiations should be terminated and the provisions set forth hereinabove for selection of a firm would apply. Section 6: Specialized Services. A. In the event that specialized services are required where it is determined that only one qualified firm can best perform the services for a specific project, the Selection Committee, in the case where the fees are greater than $25,000.00, will report to the Board(s) said findings and request authority to negotiate directly with the particular specialized firm. B. The basis of selection of the specialized firm or individual, along with the negotiated fee, shall be presented to the Board(s) of Directors for consideration. 8 Section 7: Agreement for Services. A. Upon approval by the Boards) for a negotiated agreement for services, a contract shall be executed in a form approved by the General Counsel. B. The contract shall include: 1. A statement of the scope of the project. 2. The basis and individual elements of the fees. 3. The basis for payment to the firm. 4. The time limits in which the services must be performed. 5. Provisions for fee adjustments should there be changes in the scope of work. 6. If it is determined by the Selection Committee that the Districts may be caused to incur a penalty or liability, or suffer a loss because of the failure of the firm to perform the work within specified time limits, the contract shall include a clause setting forth penalties for such nonperformance or delayed performance, in amounts to be determined by the Committee. 7. For projects exceeding $25, 000.00 in fees, the firm may, if determined appropriate by the Selection committee based on the nature and size of the project, be required to carry errors and omissions insurance coverage in an amount determined by the Selection Committee to be adequate for the project. 8. Any other provisions deemed necessary or desirable. C. Progress payments made to the firm during the time the services are being supplied shall be based on the work completed to date, as recommended by the responsible staff member. Section 8: Conflict of Interest. A. The District(s) maintain a Conflict of Interest Code, pursuant to California Government Code Section 87100 at seq. , which governs the activities and performance of duties of its officers, employees or agents in the conduct of project work, including procurement. 9 B. No Director, officer, employee or agent shall solicit or accept rebates, kickbacks, favors or other unlawful consideration from any individual or firm on behalf of any firm that may be potentially selected as a qualified firm to provide professional technical consultant services to the District. Acceptance of food and refreshments of nominal value on infrequent occasions and acceptance of gratuities or gifts shall not be deemed a violation of this provision, provided that if said items exceed $250.00 in value, in a calendar year, the Director, officer, employee or agent may be disqualified from participating in the decision pursuant to Article III of the District's Conflict of Interest Code; and, provided further, that any Director, officer, employee or agent, as a designated employee under the District's Conflict of Interest Code, has reported said gifts on his/her annual Statement of Economic Interest as required by said Code. Any Director, officer, employee or agent and each firm proposing to provide professional technical consultant services shall be bound by the provisions of the District's Code of Ethics presently in force and effect, and specifically but not limited to, Section 7D thereof relating to gifts. C. Any firm seeking selection under these procedures that violates the District(s) Conflict of Interest Code shall be automatically disqualified. Section 9: Effective Dates and Revision Procedure. A. This policy shall become effective on May 9, 1990. B. This policy may be modified from time to time as necessary to best meet the needs of the District(s) . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 9, 1990. (B30.p7) 10 RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 13 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS r M ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 10SA4 ELLIS AVENUE - v0.SDX 8127 FWNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 OFn982zE11 July 28, 1992 REPORT OF THE CONSERVATION. RECYCLE AND REUSE COMMITTEE MEETING DATE: JULY 28. 1992 - 5,30 PM COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Pr n : John C. Cox, Jr., Chairman J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Burnie Dunlap Charles G. Nichols, Conservation, Recycle Caney J. Nelson and Reuse Manager Glenn Parker Susan M. Bradford, Principal Environmental Specialist Leslie A. Pontious Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering Robert Richardson Bob Ooten, Assistant Director of Operations Phil Sansone Henry W. Wedaa Absent: OTHERS PRESENT: Frank Lazlo Betty Mrgudich, General Counsel's Office Arthur G. Newton Iry Pickler Sal Sapien Peer Swan Grace Winchell 1) Water Conservation Program Status Report Staff reviewed the enclosed report (blue) dated July 21, 1992 utilizing the enclosed discussion outline (white) summarizing the status of the Districts' water conservation program relative to the Clean Water Grant conditions approved in 1991 by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for the Hydraulic Reliability Project at Plant No. 2 totalling $1,039,580. The Districts remain in compliance with the grant requirements as long as we carry out Phase I through Phase IV of the program that the Boards of Directors approved on March 13, 1991. w Report of the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee July 28, 1992 2) Update on Districts' Recycled Water-Suooly At the February 1992 Committee Meeting, staff was authorized to negotiate an agreement with Orange County Water District (OCWD) whereby the Districts would provide secondary effluent to OCWD at no cost and the Districts would receive OCWD Green Acres Project (GAP) water for in-plant use at a price no greater than the lowest wholesale price paid by any water retailer. The Committee also directed staff to determine the cost for the Districts to produce recycled water on-site as an alternative to purchase of GAP water. Staff reported that they are conducting an ongoing series of meetings with OCWD and have developed a draft agreement that is generally acceptable to both districts. At this time, negotiations are continuing in an attempt to arrive at a mutually satisfactory price for the GAP water. Staff further reported that it has reviewed the Districts' needs for recycled water at both Plants No. 1 and 2 and retained the services of a consulting firm to determine a cost estimate to produce recycled water on-site at the Districts' two treatment plants. The Districts could install two small (1 million gallons per day) pre-packaged sand filtration and ultraviolet light disinfection systems. The proposed tertiary treatment processes and site layout were reviewed using the schematics included in the enclosed discussion outline (white). Staff reported that a preliminary cost sensitivity analysis comparing the cost to install and operate the Districts' own pre-packaged recycling plants is currently being compared with the projected GAP water costs by the Districts and OCWD. 3) Status of Anaheim ForebU Water Recycling Plant Siting A brief update was given by the staff to the Committee on water recycling plant siting activities, as summarized below: a) Waste Water Disposal Company Site Staff reported that the Waste Water Disposal Company (WWDC) representatives have agreed to pay for the hazardous waste site assessment study previously approved by the Boards that will be conducted by the consulting firm of Dames and Moore. A due diligence agreement between W WDC and the Districts has been drafted that will allow the Districts to proceed with the site assessment. Since W WDC is financially responsible for the cost of said study, staff is awaiting final approval of the contracts by W WDC. -2- Report of the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee July 28, 1992 Once the contracts with W WDC and Dames and Moore are signed, the site assessment will commence and require five to seven weeks to complete. Staff has given the W WDC representatives a deadline of August 15, 1992 to accept the due diligence agreement and the contract between Dames and Moore and the Districts. This deadline is necessary to maintain the Districts' schedule for site acquisition action by the end of 1992. b) Proposed Expansion of the Disney Theme Park and Recycled Water Needs Staff reported that it is continuing to meet with representatives from Disney Development Company (Disney) as well as the City of Anaheim to discuss the potential of a joint water recycling effort between the City, Disney, and the Districts. The Districts are discussing with Disney the roles and responsibilities for recycled water lines adjacent to the proposed expansion of the Disney theme park. Staff and legal counsel have identified items that must be defined in an agreement concerning reclaimed water lines with Disney and the City of Anaheim. Disney may need 0.26 million gallons per day of recycled water for irrigation of the proposed theme park. c) Potential Water Recycling Plant Siting at the Anaheim Rockwell Facility Staff reported on meetings with representatives from Rockwell and the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency to explore the potential for siting a water recycling facility on the Rockwell property. Rockwell owns over 200 acres of land in Anaheim and is using only a fraction of that as it is downsizing its facilities. The Districts may be able to acquire up to seven acres for a water recycling plant. Staff noted that a presentation will soon be made to Rockwell's Executive Committee by Rockwell staff, proposing the sale of approximately seven acres for such a water recycling facility. Rockwell's main concerns have included odor control, building aesthetics and compatibility with adjacent land uses. Staff reviewed artists' renderings depicting an aesthetically pleasing design for a water recycling plant. Rockwell management may reach a tentative decision on this property as soon as September. d) Letters to the Water Suppliers on Recycled Water Commitment Policy At the last Committee meeting, the members discussed the need to encourage cities in the Anaheim Forebay area to include policies regarding water recycling infrastructure in their development plans and directed staff to draft letters to the cities and water supply agencies in the Northern Service Area to determine support for water recycling in the form of recommended ordinances or new policies. -3- Ift..i Report of the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee July 28, 1992 Staff reported that in order to identify each organization's specific water reclamation needs, staff researched the water suppliers' General Plan goals and Urban Water Management Plans, focusing research on the area of land use and open space issues, resource management, and community health and safety. Letters were drafted based on this information and discussions with the staff of these organizations. The content of the letters to the eight cities with their own water utilities and three water agencies are summarized in Exhibit 1 (grey) as a sample letter. The letters request that in order to show support and desire for use of recycled water, the organizations incorporate into their General Plan goals and policy language to promote the use of recycled water as a valuable resource. The organizations are also requested to adopt ordinances that would encourage the use of recycled water in their jurisdiction. Attached to the letters are examples of water recycling ordinances from the cities of Santa Barbara, San Diego and Los Angeles. The eight cities and three water agencies that letters are prepared for are shown below in Table 1. Table 1. List of Cities and Water Agencies Anaheim Brea Buena Park California Domestic Water Company Fullerton Garden Grove Placentia Southern California Water Company Stanton Yorba Linda Yorba Linda Water District The Committee discussed the draft letter concluding that the letters were an effective first step in developing support in the service area for use of recycled water. It was suggested to also send a copy of these letters to the Orange County Water Task Force care of the County Environmental Management Agency (EMA), Advanced Planning Section, to broaden the coordinating effort. Committee Action: The Committee directed staff to immediately issue the letters to be sent to the City Managers or General Managers, with copies to be sent to the water department managers, as well as EMA, and to the Districts' Directors. -4- Report of the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee July 28, 1992 4) Feasibility Evaluation of Fuel Cells Staff was requested to investigate the feasibility of stationary fuel cells as an energy source at the Districts' treatment plants as part of its conservation or reuse program. Fuel cells would use methane gas available from the Districts' anaerobic digesters, a by-product of the sewage treatment process resulting from the biological decomposition of sludge. These fuel cells, a relatively new, innovative technology, are able to convert the methane gas into electricity with relatively few air emissions as compared to conventional internal combustion engines. Also, there may be an opportunity to pilot test a fuel cell available through the Southern California Gas Company. Committee Action: Staff was directed to begin a technology review of the fuel cells and assess the feasibility of implementation at the Districts and provide a status report to the Committee at its next meeting. Ref #230248.rp -5- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS BI ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1O ELLI9 AVENUE V.O.BOY 012, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,OMIFONNIA 9272E-812 July 21, 1992 nlllg"2 11 STAFF REPORT STATUS OF THE DISTRICTS' WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAM AND CLEAN WATER GRANT FOR HYDRAULIC RELIABILITY, PLANT NO, 2 1) Purpose The purpose of this Staff Report is to review the status of the Districts' water conservation program relative to the Clean Water Grant conditions approved in 1991 by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This report focuses on the Districts' compliance with the approved program. The report includes information as follows: (1) Purpose (2) Background (3) Construction Grant Requirements (4) Water Conservation and Implementation Plan, Phases I - IV (5) Construction Grant Conditions and Compliance (6) Revised Flow Projections and Treatment Capacity Needs (7) Joint Water Conservation Plan Partners Status 2) Background The Districts' Water Conservation and Implementation Plan approved by the SWRCB, includes a comprehensive multi-phased effort to reduce water consumption and wastewater flow. It was designed to be implemented in various phases with a key objective of documenting achievement of performance objectives and demonstrating program effectiveness. The results of early phases can be used in modifying future phases and to amend our wastewater facilities Master Plan in response to wastewater flow reductions resulting from water conservation. The water conservation program approved by the SWRCB is consistent with the Districts' water conservation policies stated in the 30-year Wastewater Management Action Plan, "2020 VISION," approved by the Joint Board of Directors in 1989. The policy objectives are summarized as follows: �AFi Staff Report Status of Districts' Water Conservation Program July 21, 1992 (1) "Actively foster and promote water conservation, and; (2) Develop cooperative programs with other public agencies to provide public education, community use of water saving devices, amend plumbing codes, and other appropriate changes to help reduce water usage." The programs that were initially envisioned involved multi-agency partnerships among cities, water agencies and private organizations within the Districts' service area to fund and staff the programs. The focus of the programs is to retrofit residences, businesses, hotels and motels with Ultra Low-Flush (ULF) toilets and low-flow showerheads, and quantify the effectiveness of the programs. The Districts' Water Conservation Program was included in "2020 VISION" and adopted by the Boards not only because it is a condition of an EPA/SWRCB construction grant, but its simply the right thing to do. 3) Construction Grant Requirements The Districts were awarded a Clean Water Grant from the SWRCB for a sum of $1,039,580 to partially fund the cost of construction of the Hydraulic Reliability Project u at Plant No. 2 during the period of September 1986 through November 1987. The project was for installing two digester gas engines in Headworks C to increase the pumping capacity. The total cost of the project was $3,832,657. A condition of such grants is a flow reduction analysis (water conservation plan) for all municipalities with a population greater than 10,000 and flow greater than 70 gallons per capita per day. For this reason the SWRCB, in their letter dated June 7, 1990, states that "CSDOC cannot simply rely on the programs of other agencies within the county, however, if CSDOC chooses not to develop its own program, it can satisfy the requirement by actively participating in the program of another agency. Any action CSDOC elects must encompass the entire service area of the Districts." A Governor's Executive Order from 1980 provides further guidance to the SWRCB by requiring the SWRCB to implement water conservation programs as a condition of state and federal grants in accordance with the Clean Water Grant Program. This was part of the statewide water conservation effort initiated by the Governor to meet present and future water conservation and energy resources objectives of the state. Through these requirements, reduced wastewater flows and new practices to safeguard and extend California's water resources were anticipated. -2- Staff Report Status of Districts' Water Conservation Program July 21, 1992 In order to comply with the construction grant conditions, on March 13, 1991, the Boards of Directors adopted the Districts' Water Conservation and Implementation Plan, Phases I through N, committing to an aggressive, phased water conservation effort. Based on the Boards' action, on May 13, 1991, the SWRCB approved the Districts' Water Conservation and Implementation Plan and declared that the construction grant conditions had been satisfied. The SWRCB, however, qualified its approval and stated that the grant would be repayable if the Districts' water conservation programs were not implemented. 4) Water Conservation and Implementation Plan, Phases I - N The four phases of the program including the cost breakdown per agency are described in more detail in Exhibit 1. A short summarization of the phases is described below: a) Phase I Part 1 Hotel/Motel Retrofit Program: Under this program, 304 ULF toilets were installed in the Disneyland Hotel. The Boards approved this retrofit program on March 13, 1991, for a Districts' amount not to exceed $10,133. This project is in cooperation with Disneyland Hotel, the City of Anaheim and the Metropolitan �..i Water District of Southern California (MWD) for a total project cost of $30,400. The installation was completed October 1, 1991. The water consumption of the ULF toilets is being compared to that of the 304 standard toilets in the same hotel. This phase is proceeding in accordance with the Plan. Collection of data started September 1991 and will be completed in December 1992. b) Phase I Part 2 Hotel/Motel Retrofit Program: Under this phase, ULF toilets and low-flow sbowerheads will be installed in an 80-unit hotel or motel in the City of Anaheim. The Boards approved this phase on March 13, 1991 for a Districts' amount not to exceed $2,060. This project is in cooperation with the City of Anaheim and MWD for a total project cost of $14,720. This phase is proceeding in accordance with the Plan. The project is expected to start in August 1992 and be completed in December 1993. c) Phase I Part 3 Residential Conservation Program: This program focuses on single-family residential distribution of 5,000 low-flow showerheads within the City of Costa Mesa. It is in cooperation with Mesa Consolidated Water District, MWD, and Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC). On March 13, 1991, the Boards approved this project for a Districts' amount not to exceed $11,667. The total project cost shared by all the partners is $100,000. Collection of water use data and sewer flows -3- Staff Report Status of Districts' Water Conservation Program July 21, 1992 v prior to kit distribution have been completed. The initial monitoring of flows after kit distribution has been conducted. This information will be used to determine the impact of the devices on overall water conservation. This phase is proceeding in accordance with the Plan. The program started in April 1991 and will be completed in August 1993. d) Phase I Part 4 Cily of Buena Park Residential Retrofit Program: On June 12, 1991, the Districts approved this demonstration project for a Districts' amount not to exceed $4,500. Through the program, 4,000 "Water-Wise" kits with low-flow showerbeads will be distributed to residents in the City of Buena Park. This project is in cooperation with the City of Buena Park and MWD for a total project cost of approximately $18,000. This phase is in accordance with the Plan and is on hold awaiting budget revisions by the City of Buena Park. e) Phase I Part 5 City of Newport Beach Conservation Retrofit Program: On June 12, 1991, the Districts approved this demonstration project for a Districts' amount not to exceed $250 to retrofit 400 units at the Hyatt Newporter Hotel with 400 low-flow showerheads. The project was completed in April 1991 in cooperation with the City of Newport Beach and MWD. The total project cost shared by the joint partners was $1,000. This phase is in accordance with the Plan. The hotel's water consumption has dropped 30 percent since the installation of the low flow showerheads as reported by the City of Newport Beach. f) Phase 11 10 Percent Hotel/Motel Retrofit Program: This phase involves the retrofit of existing toilets and showerheads in 10 percent of the hotels and motels within the City of Anaheim with ULF toilets and low-flow showerheads. The Districts' share of costs would be $44,290 with a total joint project cost of approximately $318,200. This project is in cooperation with the City of Anaheim and MWD. No funds have yet been authorized by the Districts, as this phase awaits completion of Phase I. Expected start of this phase is in 1993. This phase will be in accordance with the Plan. In the fall of 1991, the City of Anaheim requested that the Districts consider expanding its participation in the hotel/motel retrofit program by including the residential sector. The proposal would have accelerated the ULF toilet residential program and increased the Districts' share of costs by approximately $271,000. The proposal provided for installing up to about 7,800 ULF toilets and low-flow showerheads. At its December 11, 1991 meeting, the Boards of Directors considered the proposal and decided not to participate in the residential ULF toilet project. -4- Staff Report Status of Districts' Water Conservation Program July 21, 1992 g) Phase IB 100 Percent Hotel/Motel Retrofit Program: This phase expands Phase II to include all hotels and motels within the City of Anaheim (approximately 150 hotels/motels with approximately 10,200 rooms), to retrofit existing toilets and showerheads with ULF toilets and low-flow showerheads. This project is in cooperation with the City of Anaheim and MWD. The Districts' share of costs would be $135,150 with a total joint project cost of approximately $800,700. No funds have yet been authorized by the Districts, as this expanded phase awaits completion of Phase H. Expected start of this phase will be in 1994. This phase will be in compliance with the Plan. h) Phase IV City of Anaheim Residential Retrofit Program: On March 13, 1991, the Boards approved this phase in concept. The proposed project would distribute up to 100,000 low flow showerheads. The Districts' share of costs would be $87,500 with a total joint project cost of approximately $325,000. This project is in cooperation with the City of Anaheim and MWD. No funds have yet been authorized by the Districts as the implementation awaits successful completion of Phase I - Part 3. However, the City of Anaheim has proceeded to implement nearly 50 percent of this program with available funds by distributing 47,000 water conservation kits since July 1, 1991. This phase will be in accordance with the Plan. In addition to these activities identified within the Plan approved by the SWRCB, the Districts have: (1) Distributed a marketing survey in cooperation with MWDOC, to the cities within the Districts' service area to determine the level of interest in conducting a District-wide ULF toilet program. (2) Supplied water conservation kits to employees who requested them. (3) Participated in a multi-agency consortium for environmental awareness and distribution of public education material for schools. (4) Developed a new brochure for public distribution that includes conservation information. (5) Participated in community events such as Earth Day and the Orange County Fair, specifically promoting water conservation. -5- r Staff Report Status of Districts' Water Conservation Program July 21, 1992 5) Construction Grant Conditions and Compliam Staff has evaluated the grant requirements and has concluded that at this time the Districts are still in compliance with the SWRCB grant conditions because of the water conservation programs, Phases I through IV, that the Boards of Directors approved of in March 1991. All of the different phases of the program, as outlined in the previous sections, make up the total Districts' water conservation program and must all be done to satisfy the grant requirements. If there is any change in the program from what the Boards of Directors adopted in March 1991, and the SWRCB approved in May 1991, then the Districts must submit a revised program to the SWRCB for their review and approval. 6) Revised Flow Projections and Treatment Capacily Needs Drought conditions and subsequent water conservation measures within the Districts' service area, coupled with the impact of the economic downturn, have reduced the flows to the treatment plants from an annual average daily flow of 270 million gallons per day (mgd) in 1990 to a monthly low of 217 mgd in 1991 and is at a current level of 225 mgd. This reduction in flows prompted staff to review flow history and projected flows related to scheduling future facility improvements. Revised flow a i projections are necessary to ensure that the construction of additional treatment facilities will be completed in a phased approach to match the demands on the sewerage system within the Districts' service area. The Districts' treatment capacity expansion program includes recent completion of 60 mgd of primary treatment facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33. Currently in design is an additional 72 mgd primary expansion also for Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-37 (which may be divided into two 36 mgd projects, Job Nos. P1-37-1 and PI-37-2). As noted in the Disiricts' 30-year Facility Master Plan, these two facilities are intended to serve the Districts' treatment capacity needs through the year 1997, including appropriate reserve capacity for maintenance, repairs and reliability needs. Job No. P1-37-1 will add 36 mgd and was to be completed in 1993, however it is now postponed until 1996. The second portion may be postponed and completed at a later date. A final unit of 72 mgd of primary treatment was scheduled to be completed in 20N and 2012 as part of a third project. All of these projects will be assessed and scheduled for completion in the context of continuous monitoring of incoming wastewater flows and projected service and regulatory demands. -6 Staff Report Status of Districts' Water Conservation Program July 21, 1992 Given the numerous factors such as the drought, water conservation and the recession, the recorded average annual flows dropped from the previous year to about 225 to 230 mgd. The Districts' 1989 Master Plan projected flows to be at 281 mgd for fiscal year 1991-92. This is a 56 mgd difference between Master Plan prediction and recorded values shown in Exhibit 2. It is very difficult to make reliable flow projections and look at long-range planning or wastewater treatment facilities based on water conservation alone. To a large extent, it is unknown whether or not conservation measures being practiced are permanent, i.e., will conservation end when the drought ends. This is the major argument in favor of such permanent measures on ultra low-flush toilet retrofitting programs. Flows may be lower due to several factors including water conservation, unemployment, loss of tourism, and high building vacancy rates. Staff recommends continuing with the design and permitting of the P1-37 project, expected to take at least 18 months, and then make construction scheduling decisions at the appropriate time. The Districts need to be aggressive in their study of this matter to better understand it and the impacts on our facilities capital improvements. 7) Joint Water Conservation Plan Partners Status Staff has contacted the joint partners in the Districts water conservation program to learn the status of their funding of these joint programs over the course of the next fiscal year and beyond. From MWD, the response is that they will know the status of additional funding for water conservation programs after their Boards of Directors approves the budget for the fiscal year 1992-93 in July of this year. Until that time, MWD is not funding any new programs through the water conservation credits program which is on hold. The existing Phase I Parts 1 and 2 and Phase II programs with the City of Anaheim were approved for funding by MWD through the MWD conservation credits program in October and December 1991. The city's approved budget for fiscal year 1991-92 of $1.3 million and proposed budget 1992-93 of$1.6 million provides funding for further water conservation programs that include ULF toilet rebate programs. Ref Grant #230143.rp -7- y Staff Report Status of Districts' Water Conservation Program July 21, 1992 EXHIBIT 1 Water Conservation Programs Phases I - IV Cost Breakdown Per Agency PHASE I PART 1 304 rooms of the Disneyland Hotel retrofitted with Ultra Low- flush toilets. Compare results to a 304 room control group. DESCRIPTION PARTICIPANTS FUNDING HOTEL/MOTEL CSDOC $10, 133 CONSERVATION PROGRAM MWD $10, 134 CITY OF ANAHEIM $10, 133 TOTAL 830.�00 PHASE I PART 2 80-units of a hotel/motel in Anaheim retrofitted with Ultra Low- flush toilets and low-flow showerheads. DESCRIPTION PARTICIPANTS FUNDING HOTEL/MOTEL CSDOC $2,060 CONSERVATION PROGRAM MWD $4, 120 CITY OF ANAHEIM $8, 540 TOTAL 111.720 Ref Phases #230235.rp -1- Staff Report Status of Districts' Water Conservation Program July 21, 1992 EZBIBIT 1 Water Conservation Programs Phases I - IV Cost Breakdown Per Agency PHASE I PART 3 5, 000 water conservation kits that included a low-flow showerhead distributed to single family residents in the city of Costa Mesa in a door to door canvas. DESCRIPTION PARTICIPANTS FUNDING RESIDENTIAL CSDOC $11,667 CONSERVATION PROGRAM MWD $50,000 MWDOC $14, 000 MESA CONSOLIDATED $12, 000 WATER DISTRICT Admin costs shared by $12,333 all partners TOTAL _$ 000 PEASE I PART 4 4, 000 water conservation kits that include low-flow showerheads to be distributed to residents in the city of Buena Park DESCRIPTION PARTICIPANTS FUNDING RESIDENTIAL CSDOC $4,500 CONSERVATION PROGRAM MWD $9, 000 CITY OF BUENA PARK $4, 500 TOTAL 518, 000 Ref Phases 230235.rp -2- Staff Report Status of Districts' Water Conservation Program July 21, 1992 EXHIBIT 1 Water Conservation Programs Phases I - IV Cost Breakdown Per Agency PEASE I PART 5 400 rooms of the Hyatt Newporter Hotel retrofitted with low-flow showerheads. PARTICIPANTS FUNDING HOTEL/MOTEL CSDOC $250 CONSERVATION PROGRAM MWD $500 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $250 TOTAL 1 000 PHASE II 10% of the hotels and motels in the city of Anaheim to be retrofitted with Ultra Low-flush toilets and low-flow showerheads. Approximately a total of 1720 rooms. DESCRIPTION PARTICIPANTS FUNDING 10$ HOTEL/MOTEL CSDOC $44 , 290 CONSERVATION PROGRAM MWD $88, 580 CITY OF ANAHEIM $185, 330 TOTAL 5318,200 Ref Phases #230235.rp -3- Staff Report Status of Districts' Water Conservation Program July 21, 1992 EXHIBIT 1 Water Conservation Programs Phases I - IV Cost Breakdown Per Agency PHASE III 100% of the remaining hotel and motel rooms in the city of Anaheim to be retrofitted with Ultra Low-flush toilets and low- flow showerheads. Approximately a total of 10, 200 rooms. DESCRIPTION PARTICIPANTS FUNDING CSDOC $135, 150 MWD $270, 300 CITY OF ANAHEIM $395, 250 TOTAL $800.700 PHASE IV Up to 100, 000 low-flow showerheads to be distributed to residents and 6th grade classrooms in the city of Anaheim. DESCRIPTION PARTICIPANTS FUNDING "ADOPT A CSDOC $87,500 SHOWERHEAD" PROGRAM MWD $150,000 CITY OF ANAHEIM $87, 500 TOTAL I 8325.000 Ref Phases #230235.rp -4- Staff Report Status of Districts' Water Conservation Program July 21, 1992 EXHIBIT 1 Water Conservation Programs Phases I - IV Cost Breakdown Per Agency TOTAL PROGRAM COST BREAKDOWN BY AGENCY PARTICIPANTS TOTAL EST. FUNDING CSDOC $295,550 MWD $582,634 MWDOC $14,000 MESA CONSOLIDATED WATER $12,000 DISTRICT PROJECT ADMIN COSTS $12,333 CITY OF ANAHEIM $726,753 CITY OF BUENA PARK $4,500 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $250 TOTAL PROGRAM COST 51. 648,020 LEGEND: CSDOC: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County MWD : Metropolitan Water District of Southern California MWDOC: Municipal Water District of Orange County Ref Phases p230235.rp -5- Exhibit 2 Flow History and Projections 500 — Historical Flows 400 Master Plan Flows 300 E 3 0 E: 200 100 0 (0 T (0 (0 T (O (0 (0 r (D p in (0 (0 r` n CO CO 0) 0) O O T 0) (D 0) 0) 0) 0) m 0) 0) 0 O O 0 O r r r r r r r T r N N N N N Year Ref Phases k230235.rp i J CONSERVATION, RECYCLE & REUSE COMNUTTEE MEETING OF JULY 28, 1992 DISCUSSION OUTLINE u .J i ON-GOING WATER CONSERVATION PILOT PROJECTS RESULTS EXPECTED 1. DISNEYLAND HOTEL ULTRA 12/92 LOW-FLUSH TOILETS �.. 2. COSTA MESA RESIDENTIAL 08/93 LOW-FLOW SHOWERHEADS 3. NEWPORT BEACH HYATT NEWPORTER 04/92 HOTEL LOW-FLOW SHOWERHEADS W#23 a." WATER CONSERVATION PROJECTS AWAITING ACTION v INITIATION EXPECTED 1. PART 2 HOTEL/MOTEL RETROFITS - 12/92 NEW 80-UNIT HOTEL OR MOTEL RETROFIT WITH ULTRA LOW-FLUSH TOILETS AND LOW-FLOW SHOWERHEADS 2. PHASE II HOTEL/MOTEL RETROFITS - 12/93 UP TO 10% OF EXISTING ROOMS IN CITY OF ANAHEIM RETROFIT WITH ULTRA LOW-FLUSH TOILETS AND LOW-FLOW SHOWERHEADS 3. PHASE III HOTEL/MOTEL RETROFITS - 12/94 UP TO 100% OF EXISTING ROOMS IN CITY OF ANAHEIM RETROFIT WITH ULTRA LOW-FLUSH TOILETS AND LOW-FLOW SHOWERHEADS 4. PHASE IV RESIDENTIAL RETROFIT - 12/93 UP TO 100,000 LOW-FLOW SHOWERHEADS DISTRIBUTED TO RESIDENCES IN ANAHEIM W#23oxa4." -2- u DISTRICTS' RECLAIMED WATER SUPPLY COMPARE THE ECONOMICS BETWEEN ACQUIRING GREEN ACRES PROJECT RECYCLED WATER FROM OCWD AND THE DISTRICTS' OWN, ON-SITE RECLAMATION PLANTS. Ref#230244." -3- 04-17-92 RAPID FLOCCULATION FILTRATION ULTRAVIOLET TITLE 22 MN DISINFECTION �� FLOW CONTROL VALVE Tm ( I Zur I { } TO DISTRIBUTION ,17J FROM PLANT COAGULANT SODIUM SYSTEM WATER PUMP HYPOCHLORITE STATION SODIUM HTPOCHLORITE LEGEND -�- SWING CHECK VALVE -tSrJ- BALL VALVE BUTTERFLY VALVE - �- FLOW METER FIGURE 1 PACKAGE PLANT PROCESS CONFIGURATION - m\tN isC\f RFO\VACKACF2.UNG C DC-17 - ^ ULTRAVIOLET DISINFECTION I I +I ` - - - I -- W FILTERS , __-TITLE 22 I PUMP STATION W I IRECLAI ED WA ERMTO L - - DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM L59 11VA TER SUPPLY II I BACKWASH WATER I II SUPPLY LOCCULATIO CHEMICAL I STORAGE SYSTEMS I TANK I II I RAPID I I_ MIX FROM PLANT _ PLAN VIEW WA ER SYSTEM SCALE S"=7'-0" FIGURE 2 PACKAGE PLANT FACILITIES LAYOUT I-\U%f RS\C.lN\I RF.D\PACKAGFI.DWG LJ SUMMARY OF TROJAN ULTRA-VIOLET LIGHT DISINFECTION INSTALLATIONS • TOTAL NUMBER INSTALLED SINCE 1982 - 278 • MAJORITY INSTALLED OVER PAST 5 YEARS • RANGE IN SIZE FROM 0.03 MGD TO 120 MGD • RANGE OF TYPE OF INSTALLATIONS FROM POTW'S TO INDUSTRY • INSTALLATIONS LOCATED IN 33 STATES AND 7 COUNTRIES Ref#23M 1., u 3) STATUS OF ANAHEIM FOREBAY RECLAMATION PLANT SITING A) WASTE WATER DISPOSAL COMPANY (WWDC) B) PROPOSED DISNEY EXPANSION C) ROCKWELL D) LETTERS TO CITIES AND WATER AGENCIES ON RECLAMATION POLICY W xnatza." TABLE 1. LIST OF CITIES AND WATER AGENCIES CITY WATER PURVEYOR ANAHEIM CITY OF ANAHEIM BREA CITY OF BREA BUENA PARK CITY OF BUENA PARK FULLERTON CITY OF FULLERTON GARDEN GROVE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE PLACENTIA SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY YORBA LINDA WATER DISTRICT STANTON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY YORBA LINDA YORBA LINDA WATER DISTRICT Rdr)3m40.RP EXHIBIT I DRAFT July 21, 1992 Subject: Policies in Support of Water Reuse The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts), in a joint effort with the Orange County Water District (OCWD), are in the early stages of siting a water reclamation plant in northern Orange County to provide water reuse as an additional "source" of water for landscape irrigation and industrial uses. This reclaimed water would be derived from local wastewaters diverted from the regional sewerage system. The wastewater would be treated in a state-of-the-art advanced treatment facility to meet stringent California Department of Health Services (Title 22) for the intended uses. Our planning for such facilities is an integral part of the Districts' 30-year Action Plan for Wastewater Management and Environment Protection entitled "2020 VISION', completed in 1989. This Action Plan sets forth the construction and operation of up to three new satellite water reclamation plants by the year 2020. Our consideration of such wastewater reclamation facilities has been ongoing for many years. Recent changing trends make it feasible for reclaimed water to compete more economically with potable water supplies. This is in part the result of a recent law (Assembly Bill 1698) that declares that the use of potable water for toilet or urinal flushing in non-residential structures is a waste and unreasonable use of water. Similar legislation exists with regard to irrigation of golf-courses. Economic incentives provided by the Metropolitan Water District also help stimulate the construction of water reclamation facilities and distribution systems. Another law (Assembly Bill 1869) requires discussion of water reclamation as part of the City's Urban Water Management Plan. This law requires the Plans to include an estimate of their potable and recycled water use. It also requires that the Plan identify recycled water measures being practiced, as well as a description of findings, actions and plans related to water audits and incentive programs. All of these factors add up to the conclusion that a closer working relationship between our organizations would lead to more efficient use of water resources and a greater degree of water self-sufficiency for Orange County and your City. m Request for Policies in Support of Water Reuse " July 21, 1992 The Districts' staff has reviewed the City's draft General Plan update and noted the city's goals and policies related to resource management. We have identified areas of the Plan where we may be of future help to the City in meeting its projected water needs by providing recycled water for irrigating parks, green belts, and for use by industries. As noted in your General Plan, one of the City's goals is Recycled water could be a reliable irrigation source that would enhance the aesthetic value of open spaces used for recreation and natural resource protection. In addition, the goal of maintaining and expanding water systems to meet the present and future needs of the residents and environment of the City was identified. Recycled water could be effectively used to help meet this goal, as well as further the City's stated policies of increasing water supply self-sufficiency by raising the percentage of water provided locally. A City water recycling ordinance could allow for the use of recycled water in accordance with the Department of Health Services Title 22 and the Regional Water Quality Control Board's regulations on reclamation programs. During your General Plan update process, the Districts' staff is ready to assist the City s staff in drafting new goals and policies, as necessary, to promote recycled water as a valuable resource. Overall, legislative mandates combined with the recent drought indicate a need to take action to make better use of our limited local resources. These circumstances provide opportunity to initiate local programs to recycle water that will further aid Orange County for sustaining water supplies during drought conditions. The proposed reclamation plants would be 5 to 10 million gallon per day (mgd) facilities encompassing 5 to 10 acres. These facilities would be designed to have multiple uses and be architecturally and aesthetically compatible with the surrounding area. We have prepared preliminary designs and conducted limited market surveys of potential reclaimed water users and concluded that reclamation facilities are feasible. Local legislation and planning revisions will be necessary to implement such programs. At the local level, cities such as San Diego, Los Angeles, and Santa Barbara have recently passed water recycling ordinances, recycling resolutions, amendments to the Uniform Plumbing Code, and variances to allow for the use of this "new" water supply. Such vehicles, once passed, will help develop the market needed to promote water recycling. Similar support from cities within the Districts' service area is required for our Board of Directors to implement their long-term plan to meet our Master Plan water reclamation goals. Enclosed are copies of sample water recycling directives from the Cities of Santa Barbara, Los Angeles, and San Diego. By adopting a water recycling ordinance for dual -2- k 9 Request for Policies in Support - of Water Reuse July 21, 1992 plumbing and recycled water use, the City could provide a critical link to ensure the success of water recycling in northern and central Orange County. We respectfully ask that you consider developing similar mandates for your City. The Districts' looks forward to working with City officials and other appropriate parties to investigate and implement programs that reduce water consumption and wastewater flows and enhance the use of reclaimed water. The Districts' staff stands ready to assist you in optimizing water management practices and ma3dmizing use of reclaimed water as a valuable supplement to existing supplies for meeting future water needs. We would like to meet with you or your staff and further identify specific water recycling programs and how we can work together to meet our mutual water resource management goals. Sincerely, J. Wayne Sylvester General Manager KOC:gc Enclosures Ref #230236.1tr -3- DRAFT June 17, 1991 Ordinance No. An Ordinance Amending Chapter XII, and Subsection 98.0403 and Section 64.30,of the Los Angeles Municipal Code. NOW THEREFORE, THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The new Article V is hereby added to Chapter XII of the Los Angeles Municipal Code to read as follows: SECTION 125.00 PURPOSE. WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have a primary interest in the development of facilities to reclaim and reuse treated wastewater to assist in meeting the future water requirements of the state by supplementing existing surface and underground water supplies (California Water Code, Section 13510); and WHEREAS, conservation of all available water resources requires the maximum use of reclaimed water for beneficial use (Water Code Section 461); and WHEREAS, the City of Los Angeles has adopted the following specific goals for the use of reclaimed water: to reclaim 250,000 acre-feet annually, or 40 percent of the water used, by the year 2010; to reclaim 600,000 acre-feet annually, or 70 percent of the water used, by the year 2050; and to reclaim 800,000 acre-feet annually, or 80 percent of the water used, by the year 2090; and WHEREAS, the users of reclaimed water receive certain benefits, including reduced water rates and uninterruptible supply, not subject to drought or conservation restrictions; and WHEREAS; throughout Southern California, the lack of available water has limited development projects otherwise beneficial to our communities; and 1 a DRAFT June 17, 1991 U WHEREAS, continued use of potable water for irrigation of greenbelt areas, industrial cooling and other uses may not be the highest and best use of such water. where reclaimed water is available; and . - WHEREAS, the City of Los Angeles is highly dependent on limited imported water for domestic, industrial, agricultural and other uses, and the supply reliability of imported water is always uncertain; therefore, THE PURPOSE of this article is to provide for the development and maximum utilization of reclaimed water. SECTION 125.01 POLICY The policy of the City of Los Angeles is that reclaimed water is deemed a resource,to be developed for beneficial use wherever financially and technically feasible, consistent with legal requirements, safety and welfare, and preservation of the environment and of public health. SECTION 125.02 DEFINITIONS A. The following definitions are defined for the purpose of this Ordinance: Board of Water and Power Commissioners - The Board of Water and Power Commissioners of the City of Los Angeles, or its designee. Development project- The construction of, addition to, or alteration of, any building or structure, or a change of use of an existing building or structure which requires a building permit and which results in an Increase in floor area, or a net increase in average daily vehicle trips as determined by using trip generation factors promulgated by the Department of Transportation for the purpose of effectuating Section 16.05 of this Code. Director of Planning-The Director of the Department of City Planning of the City of Los Angeles, or his/her designee. High gradq industrial water system - a water system designed to provide water for Industrial or technological uses which, for technical reasons inherent in the industrial process, cannot be met through the use of reclaimed water. 2 ti DRAFT .. June 17, 1991 Irrigation system - any method of application of water to vegetation, whether manual or automatic, and whether using existing or new techniques. The term "sprinkler system shall be construed as meaning 'Irrigation system" in the Los Angeles�Municipal Code when referring to the application of water to plants, unless it is specifically defined otherwise for the purposes of an individual subsection. Potable water-water which is satisfactory for drinking, culinary and domestic purposes and meets the requirements of the Health Authority having jurisdiction. Reclaimed water system - a plumbing, piping or other water system provided in a development project, separate from that designed for potable water, and designed for the transport and use of reclaimed water, and meeting all material and construction specifications adopted pursuant to this Code. Non potable water system - any plumbing, piping or other water system provided in a development project,'except facilities designed to provide water for direct contact by persons (such as drinking fountains, sinks, showers, bathtubs, coffee machines, drink dispensers, safety showers and safety eyewashers), and except high grade industrial water systems. Non potable water systems include but are not limited to toilets, urinals, and irrigation systems. Reclaimed water -water which, as a result of treatment of wastewater, is suitable for a beneficial use. (See Water Code Section 13050(n).) Reclaimed water distribution system - A delivery system, including but not limited to pipelines, reservoirs, pumps and controls from the source of supply to the point of connection with individual properties, intended for the delivery of reclaimed water only, and which is separate from any potable water distribution system. Reclaimed water irrigation system - an irrigation system designed for the use of reclaimed water and meeting all material and construction specifications adopted pursuant to this Code. Reclaimed water service area map - The most recently updated map, including designated areas, adopted by the City Council pursuant to Subsection 125.03(C)(2). Sewerage Facilities Charge-The charge, or cumulative sum of all such charges if more than one, assessed a development project by the Department of Public Works on the 3 DRAFT June 17, 1991 basis of the most recently adopted Sewerage Facilities Charge Guide or successor document StrategleAetion Plan for Water Reclamation-The most recently adopted plan adopted by the City Council pursuant to Subsection 125.03. Superintendent of Building - The General Manager of the Department of Building and Safety of the City of Los Angeles, or his/her designee. B. All terms and phrases used in this Ordinance and not defined above shall have the meanings set forth in Section 12.03 of this Code, if defined therein. SECTION 125.03. STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN FOR WATER RECLAMATION A. GENERAL: Upon adoption of this ordinance,the Department of Water and Power, in coordination and cooperation with the Department of Public Works, the Department of City Planning, and the Office of Water Reclamation shall prepare a Strategic Action Plan for Water Reclamation to define, encourage, and maximize the development of reclaimed water use within the City's jurisdiction. The Strategic Action Plan for Water Reclamation shall be designed to meet the City's goals for the use of reclaimed water, as stated in Section 125.00 or specifically amended by the City Council. Appropriate sections of the Advanced Planning Report on Effluent Management, or successor document, which is prepared and updated by the Department of Public Works, and of the Urban Water Management Plan, or successor document, which is prepared and updated by the Department of Water and Power, shall be incorporated and reconciled with the Strategic Action Plan for Water Reclamation. B. ADOPTION AND REVIEW. The Strategic Action Plan for Water Reclamation shall be submitted to the City Council for adoption and updated not less than every five years. The Board of Water and Power Commissioners shall report annually to the city council the state of progress under the plan. C. CONTENTS. The Strategic Action Plan for Water Reclamation shall include, but not be limited to, the following: 1. Long-range plan for water reclamation. Development of a long- range plan for the production, delivery and use of reclaimed water. 4 DRAFT June 17, 1991 The plan shall Include, but not be limited to: a. Specific goals, based on planning horizons of five, 10 and 20 years, and as appropriate, for the production, delivery and use of reclaimed water. b. Evaluation of the location, size, present and future capacity, and expected lifetime of present and planned water reclamation plants, pump stations, distribution pipelines, storage reservoirs;and other related facilities. C. Identification of opportunities for the expansion of the reclaimed water production system, such as the upgrading of existing or development of new wastewater treatment facilities. Estimation of the feasibility and cost of developing such opportunities. Recommendations for financing such development. d. Identification of opportunities for expansion of the reclaimed water distribution system. Identification of opportunities to accelerate the rate of expansion of the distribution system. Examples Include development of abandoned pipeline routes, abandoned and to-be-abandoned usable pipelines of oil companies and other utilities, street reconstruction projects, and metrorail construction. Feasibility and cost estimates. Recommendations for financing. D. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NEW SOURCES OF WATER TO MEET INCREASING DEMAND FOR WATER IN LOS ANGELES. Evaluation, based on an appropriate long term planning horizon, of various water sources, including purchase and/or importation of water, water reclamation and conservation. Consideration of the cost to the city of utilizing the various sources. Consideration of the dependability of supply and capacity of each source. Consideration of environmental factors. Consideration of regional and state costs. Consideration of the demand for potable and reclaimed water. Statement of assumptions used for analysis, including estimates for capital, operating and distribution costs, discount rates, useful life of plant and equipment, price and projected future price of purchased potable water, and demand for potable and reclaimed water. Evaluation and ranking of individual projects or sources, including those Identified in Subsection 125.03(C)(1). Recommendation of an optimal overall plan to meet increasing demand for water. 2. Reclaimed Water Service Area Map. Preparation of a reclaimed water service area map, delineating the areas served or shortly to be served by the reclaimed water distribution system. As frequently as necessary, and at intervals not 5 DRAFT June 17, 1991 exceeding five years, the reclaimed water service area map shall be updated to reflect all additions and planned additoins to the reclaimed water distribution system and- forwarded to the City Council for approval. The reclaimed water service area map shall list and classify as "designated areas" all areas within the boundaries of the City of Los Angeles which meet either of the following criteria: a. The area is currently served by the reclaimed water distribution system. b. The area is scheduled to be served by the reclaimed water distribution system within the next ten years, as determined by the Board of Water and Power Commissioners in accordance with Subsection 125.03(C)(1). 3. Rules and regulations. Establishment of general rules, regulations, standards and procedures governing the use and distribution of reclaimed water. 4. Financial assistance and incentive program. Identification of resources, and recommendation of specific measures, to assist reclaimed water users to finance necessary conversions. Development of an incentive program to promote the acceptance and use of reclaimed water. 5. Pilot and demonstration projects. Preparation of plans for the documentation of pilot projects for the less common types of water reuse, such as those proposed for Playa Vista and Porter Ranch developments. 6. Public awareness program. Evaluation of the need for, and possible benefit arising from, the establishment and operation of a water reclamation public awareness program. Recommendations for the establishment of such a program, if beneficial. 7. Mandatory reclaimed water use. Evaluation and recommendation of types of water use, such as greenbelt irrigation, agricultural irrigation, office building uses, filling of habitat lakes, dust control, compaction activities or industrial processes, that shall be limited, wholly or partially, to reclaimed water. Recommendation of a schedule for mandating the use of reclaimed water for these types of uses. a. Coordination among agencies. Recommendations for actions to coordinate efforts between the City of Los Angeles and other local and regional agencies to share in the production and utilization of reclaimed water within and outside the City. G _. DRAFT June 17, 1991 9. Utilization of the state of the art Evaluation of the efforts of other municipalities and bodies planning and implementing dual plumbing and other emerging types of reclaimed water use. Utilization of the experience of other agencies in order to advance the use of the City's reclaimed water. 10. Reclaimed water source protection and Improvement measures. Recommendations for control measures and management practices in addition to those required by State and Federal regulations,to maintain or improve the quality of reclaimed water. Such control measures may include but are not limited to: a. Capital improvements to the wastewater collection and treatment system. b. Additional waste discharge restrictions for industrial, commercial and residential discharges, based on evaluation, for each water reclamation plattt, of sources of waste discharge and influent quality relative to the anticipated final uses of reclaimed water produced by the plant c. A stronger enforcement program to ensure greater compliance with waste discharge requirements and restrictions. SECTION 125.04 IMPLEMENTATION A. DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS. No grading permit, foundation permit, building permit, use of land permit, sewer permit, orwater hook-up permit shall be issued for any development project unless at least one of the following conditions first has been met: 1. The Director of Planning, on the basis of the Reclaimed Water Service Area Map and Subsection 125.04(C), has.determined that the development project is not required to provide a reclaimed water irrigation system nor a reclaimed water system. 2. The Superintendent of Building has issued the appropriate favorable reclaimed water facilities permit for the development project, in accordance with Subsection 125.04(B). 7 DRAFT June 117, 1991 B. RECLAIMED WATER FACILITIES PERMIT. 1. Authority. The Superintendent of Building shall Have the authority to approve, conditionally approve or deny a reclaimed water facilities permit in accordance with the purpose and provisions of this Section. 2. Findings. In issuing a Reclaimed Water Facilities Permit, the Superintendent of Building shall adopt written findings, and shalt issue a Reclaimed Water Facilities Permit only upon finding that the development project meets all of the following requirements.: a. In the case that the Director of Planning, In accordance with this Section, has determined that the development project shall provide a reclaimed water irrigation system, that all irrigation systems provided by the development project are reclaimed water irrigation systems. b. In the case that the Director of Planning, in accordance with this Section, has determined that the development project shall provide a reclaimed water system, that all non potable water systems provided in new floor area by the development project are reclaimed water systems, and that all irrigation systems provided by the development project are reclaimed water irrigation systems. Nothing in this Section is intended to require the installation or retrofitting in existing floor area of reclaimed water systems. C. SCHEDULE AND THRESHOLDS FOR REQUIREMENT OF RECLAIMED WATER FACILITIES. 1. Schedule and thresholds. The following thresholds shall apply to individual permits and also to the cumulative sum of related or successive permits which are part of a larger project, such as piecemeal additions to a building, or multiple buildings on a lot, as determined by the Director of Planning. a. Beginning January 1, 1992, "major'development projects, as defined in Section 4 of Ordinance 166127, and which lie within the boundaries of the Reclaimed Water Service Area Map designated areas, shall provide a reclaimed water irrigation system. a DRAFT June 17, 1991 b. Beginning January 1, 199Z all development projects on a project site of one acre or greater, and which lie within the boundaries of the Reclaimed Water Service Area Map, shall provide a reclaimed water Irrigation system. C. Beginning January 1, 1995,development projects which result In an increase of 40,000 square feet or more of nonresidential floor area, and which lie within the boundaries of the Reclaimed Water Service Area Map designated areas, shall provide a reclaimed water system. ` d. Beginning January 1,2000,development projects which result In an increase of 40,000 gross square feet or more of floor area, including residential floor area, and which lie within the boundaries of the Reclaimed Water Service Area Map designated areas, shall provide a reclaimed water system. 2. Exceptions. The following exceptions shall apply: a. The provisions of Subsection 125.04(C)(1) shall not apply to any development project involving replacement of an earthquake hazardous building demolished as a result of enforcement of the Earthquake Safety Ordinance (Division 88, Article 1, Chapter 14 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code.) b. The provisions of Subsection 125.04(C)(1) shall not apply to any development project for which a building permit is required (a) in order to comply with an order Issued by the Department of Building and Safety to repair an unsafe or substandard condition, or (b) in order to rebuild as a result of destruction by fire, earthquake, or other natural disaster. a The provisions of Subsection 125.04(C)(1) shall not apply to any development project for which a building permit has been issued pursuant to this Code, before the effective date of this Section. d. The provisions of Subsection 125.04(C)(1)(c) and of Subsection 125.04(C)(1)(d) shall not apply to any development project for which the Sewerage Facilities Charge, if ahy, assessed by the Board of Public Works, or the cumulative sum of all such charges, is less than $5,000.00. D. PERMrr APPEALS PROCESS. 9 RAFT June 17, 1991 1. Determinations. Appeals of determinations made pursuant to Subsection 125.04(A)(1) shall be made and governed in accordance with the provisions of the Planning and Zoning Code. . 2. Permits. Appeals of the issuance or non-issuance of permits pursuant to Subsection 125.04(A)(2) shall be made and governed in accordance with the provisions of the Building Code. SECTION 125.05. MATERIAL AND CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS FOR RECLAIMED WATER SYSTEMS. Within six months of the adoption of this ordinance, the Department of Building and Safety, in cooperation with the Department of Water and Power, the Office of Water Reclamation, the Bureau of Engineering, the Department of Recreation and Parks, and private industry representatives, and with consultation of the State and County Departments of Health, and with reference to and in conformity with state law, shall prepare and adopt material and construction specifications for reclaimed water irrigation systems and reclaimed water systems. Specifications may include, but are not limited to, pipe identification, quick coupling valves, washdown hydrants and other points of public access, warning labels, control and regulating valves, strainers, reclaimed water piping, potable water piping conversion requirements, design criteria, , and temporary Initial use of potable water in reclaimed water systems If reclaimed water Is not immediately available. Specifications may be based on the final draft 'Guidelines for Distribution of Nonpotable Water'developed by the Water Reclamation Committee of the American Water Works Association, Califomia-Nevada Section. Section 2. Requests for slight modifications. 2.1 The second unnumbered paragraph of Subsection 98.0403(1)(b) of this Code Is amended to read as follows: The Superintendent of Building shall have the power to hear and determine requests for slight modifications for individual cases in the provisions of the building ordinances of the city (Chapter 9), and in the yard area requirements of the zoning ordinance (Article 2 of Chapter 1), and in the design of parking facilities (Section 1221- A,5), and in the requirements for the provision of reclaimed water facilities (Article 5 of Chapter 12), provided that in each such modification the superintendent shall first find that a special, individual reason makes the strict letter of the ordinance impractical and that the modification is in conformity with the spirit and purpose of the ordinance 10 DRAFT June 17, 1991 involved. Any such action granting modifications shall be recorded and entered in the files of the department. 2.2 Subsection 98.0403(2)(b) of this Code is amended to read as follows: (b) The jurisdiction of the superintendent shall include the right to hear and determine requests for slight modifications from the provisions of Chapter 9 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code or the yard area requirements of Article 2 of Chapter 1 of said code or the requirements for the provision of reclaimed water facilities of Article 5 of Chapter 12 of said code. 2.3 The first paragraph of Subsection 98.0403(2)(c)(2) Is amended to read as follows: 2. With respect to requests to the superintendent for slight modifications from the provisions of Chapter 9 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code or the yard area requirements of Article 2 of chapter 1 thereof or the requirements for the provision of reclaimed water facilities of Article 5 of chapter 12 thereof, the person making the request shall state the special, individual reason which makes compliance with the strict letter of the applicable provisions impractical, and shall show that the modification requested is in ..J conformity with the spirit and the purpose of said provisions, all as required by Section 93 of the Los Angeles City Charter. Section 3. Regulation of waste discharge to the sewer system. 3.1 Subdivision 1 of Section 64.30(A) of the Los Angeles Municipal Code is I ereby amended to read: Policy. It is the policy of the City of Los Angeles to assure that the highest and best use of the Publicly Owned Treatment Works (P.O.T.W.) is the collection, treatment, reclamation and reuse, and disposal of domestic wastewater, and that the highest and best use of the storm drain system is for the collection and disposal of storm water. The use of either of these systems for industrial wastewater or by contract agencies is a privilege which is subject to the requirements of this section. 11 DRAFT June 17, 1991 3.2 Subdivision 2 of Section 64.30(A) of the Los Angeles Municipal Code Is U hereby amended by adding a new Paragraph (D to read: (I) Prevent any discharge into the P.O.T.W. which may interfere wth the production, delivery or use of reclaimed water from the P.O.T.W. or the Waters of the State to users. 3.3 Subdivision 1(a) of Section 64.30(B) of the Los Angeles Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding a now Paragraph (17) to read: (17) Any liquids, solids or gases, or any discharge, which may cause damage or harm to any reclaimed water facility, or which may increase the cost of reclaiming water, or which may limit or prevent any use of reclaimed water authorized by Title 22, State of California Code of Regulations, or which may cause damage or harm to any user or users or potential user or users of reclaimed water. Section 4. Validity If any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the ordinance and the application of such provisions to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby. 12 (0-89-241) ORDINANCE NUMBER 0.17327 (NEW SERIES) ADOPTED ON July 24.1989 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER VI.ARTICLE 4,OFTHE SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING DIVISION 8,SECTIONS 64.01801,64.0810.. RELATING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A WATER RECLAMATION MASTER PLAN AND IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES FOR THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO. BE rr ORDAINED,by the Council of The City of San Diego,as follows Section I. That Chapter VI,Article4,of the San Diego Municipal Code be and the same is hereby amended by adding Division 8,Sections 64.0801 through 64.0810,to read as folows: DIVISION 8 SEC.64.0801. FINDINGS,PURPOSE AND IN TENT The Council of The City of San Diego finds that, a)the people of the State of California have a primary interest in the development of facilities to reclaim water containing waste to supplement exismtg surface and underground water supplies and to assist in meeting the future water requimmcats of the state;(California Water Code section 13510);and b)conservation of a0 available wear resotnces requves the maximum reuse of wastewater for beneficial uses of water(Water Code section 461);and c)continued use of potable water for irrigation of greenbelta=and for other ases where the use of reclaimed water is suitable may be an unreasonable use of such water where reclaimed water is av"able;and d)the state policies describedabove am in the best interest of the City.The majorityofjmisdictions in San Diego County have adopted measures to promote waterreclarnation.Ibis ordi nance is necessary to protect the common water supply of the region which is vital topublic health and safety,and to prevent endangerment of public and privateproperty.San DiegoCotmtyis highlydependentonlimitedimportedwmerfordomestic,agricultural and industrial uses. The reliability of the supply of imported water is uncertain. By developing and utilizing . reclaimed water,the need feradditional imported watercam be reduced. In lightof these circumstances,certain uses of potable water may be considered unreasonable or to constium:a nuisance where reclaimed water is Warr 95 Building surmisable Casasusblo available or production of reclaimed water is unduly impaired. SEC.64.0802 WATER RECLAMATION POLICY It is the policy of the City that reclaimed water shall be used within its jurisdiction wherever feasible, and consistent with legal requirements,preservation of public health,safety and welfare,and the environment. SEC.64.0803 DEFINITIONS The following trams are defined for purposes of this ordinance: (a)AGRICULTURAL PURPOSES: Agriculturulpurposes include the growing offieldandnursery crops,row, crops,tees,and vines and the feeding of fowl and livestock . (b)ARTIFICIALLAKE: Ahuman-madelake,pond. lagoon,orotherbody ofwaterthatis used whollyorpanly fmalandsrapeimpmmdmmt,arestrictedr=cationalimpormdmentmanon-resnictedre adonalimpowdmenL (c)COMMERCIALOFFKEBUR.DING: Anybuilding foroffrceorcommercial uses with waterrequirements which include,but ate not limited to,landscape irrigation,milers,urinals and decorative fountains. (d)GREENBELT AREAS: A greenbeltarea includes,butis not limited to,golfcomses,cemeteries,parks and landscaping. (e)INDUSTRIAL PROCESS WATER: Wwausedbyany industrial facility with process waterrequirements era.✓ which include,but are not limited to,rinsing,washing,cooling and circulation,or construction,including any facility regulated by the industrial warm water discharge ordinance of the City.(Municipal Code,Chapter VI, Article 4). (f)OFF-SITE FACILITIES: Water(or reclaimed water)facilities from the source of supply to the point of connection with the w-site facilities,normally up to and including the water meter. (g) ON•SrM FACILITIES: Water(or reclaimed water) facilities under the control of the owner, normally downstream from the water merer. (h)POTABLE WATER: Wawxwhichcmfmmstothefedetal,stateandlocalsmndardsforhuman w=ption. (i)RECLAIMED WATER: Waterwhieh.maresultoftreatmentofwmmwater,is suitable foradirectbeneficial use or controlled use that would not otherwise occur. (See Water Code section 13050(n).) ())RECLAW ED WATER DISTRIBUTION: A piping system intended for the delivery of reclaimed water separate from any potable water distribution system. (k)WASTE DISCHARGE:Waste discharge meanswaterdeposited,released ordischarged into asewersystem from any commercial,industrial or residential source which contains levels of any substance which my cause . substantial harm many water treatmentorreetamariw facility or which may preventany use of reclaimed water authorized by law,provided levels exceed those found in water actually delivered to the source of the waste Winer 96 Building Sutminabk Comraaodo discharge by the water purveyor. SEC.64.0804 ADMINLSTRATION (a)GENERAL.TheCityMaaagershalladminister,implementandenfmnethepmvisionsofthisordinance.Any powers granted to or duties imposed upon We City Manager may be delegated by the City Manager in persons in the employ of the City. (b)REGULATIONS. The City Manager shall make and enforce regulations necessary to the administration of this ordinance. The Manager may amend such regulations from time to time as conditions require. These regulations shall be consistent with the general policy established herein by the City Council. SEC.64.0805 PENALTY FOR VIOLATION (a)PUBLIC NUISANCE Dischargeof wastes orthemeofreclaimedwaterinanymannerin violation of this ordinancewofanypermitissuedhereunderisherebydxhuedapublicmds andshallbecorrectedorabemd as directed by City. Any person creating Such a public nuisance is guilty of a misdemeanor. • (b)INJUNCTION: Whenever am of reclaimed water is in violation of this ordinance crotherwise causes m threatens to cause a condition or nuisance,the City may seek injunctive relief as may be appropriate to enjoin �'✓ Such discharge or use. (c)PERMITREVOCATfON: Inaddition w any otherstatute orrule authorizingtmnimdon ofreclaimedwaer Service,the City Managermay revoke apermit issued hereunder ifaviolatimcfanypmvision of this ordinance is found to exist or if use of reclaimed water causes or threatens to cause a nuisance. (d)PENALTY:Any owner aadloroperaterwho violates any penal provision of this ordinance Shall,foreach day ofviolation,orportion thereof,be subject toafinenotexcceding$1,000.In addition,waruservicem the property may be discontinued SEC.64.0806 WATER RECLAMATION MASTER PLAN (a)GENERAL: Upon adoptionof this ordinance,the City Shallpreparcand adopt a WaterReclavmdon Master Plan to define,encourage,and develop the use of reclaimed waterwithin its boundaries. The MoterPlzn shag be updated every five years. The Master Plan MY be one or tame documents covering specific portions of the planning area @)CONTENTS OFTIERECLAMA77ON MASTER PLAN:The MntcrPlanshallinclude,butnotbeiimited to,dre following: • (1)PLANTS AND FACILITIES. Evaluation of the location and size of present and fit=reclamation treatment plants,distribution pipelines,pump stations,rese irs,and other related facilities,including cost Ware,97 Building Swiamm k Commamiies estimates and potential fmarcmg methods. (2)RECLAIMED WATER SERVICE AREAS. A designation,based on the criteria set forth in Swuon 64.0802 and the information derived from Sections 61.0806(b)(1)and(b)(2)of the areas within the City that canor my in the f nazo use reclaimed waterin lieu of potable water. Reclaimed wmeruses can include,butare not limited in,the irrigation of greenbelt and agricultural areas,filling of artificial lakes,and appropriate industrial and commercial uses. (3)TRIBUTARY AREAS. A designation of proposed tributary areas for each water rechunation facility identified in the Master Plait,providing maps showing locations of major sewers tributary to an existing in proposed plait site.and the tributary area served by the facility. (4)QUALITY OF WATERTO BERECI n rMFD. An evaluation ofwaterquality with respect to the effect onanticipateduses of reclaimed watermbe servedbyeach trmtmemfacility. Anevaluationofsou cesofwaste discharge and sewer inflow thin may,directly crcmnulatively,substantially contribute to adverse water quality conditions in reclaimed water.In the event that sutEeicnt dare is not available,recommendations on m enhanced sampling and monitoring program to provide additional data for further development of rouse options or necessary discharge regulation. (5)TRIBUTARY PROTECTION MEASURES.Recommendations of control measures and management p=u=fmmehdesignatedtnbumry=tomainmmmimpmvethequalityofmclaimedwamr. Suchcontrol measures may include capital improvements to the sewercollation system and waste dischagerestrictions for industrial,commercial and residential discharges. (6) SCBEDUI.E. A schedule for implementation, including additional planning and pre-design steps, institutional arrangements,permits,laid acquisition,design,construction,startup,and facility phasing for each reclaimed water service area SEC.64.0807 MANDATORY RECLAIMED WATER USE (a)GENERAL. No pawn orpublic agency,as used in California Water Code section 13551,shall use weer from any wureeorof quality suitable for potable domestic use for the irrigation of greenbelt arms,orother uses where the use of reclaimed water is suitable,when reclaimed water is available. (b)IDENTIFICATION OF USERS. Persons or agencies who are mandated to use reclaimed water are to be identified and permihcd as described in this section. (c)EXISTING POTABLE WATER SERVICE,, (1) PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION. Based upon the Master Plan, upon the designation of each reclaimed water service men orthe commencement of the design ofnew reclaimed water facilities,the City shall make preliminary deteramatioas as to which existing potable water customers shall be converted to the use of V wmer 98 • Budding Sum bk Cwamwider reclaimed water. Each water customer shall be notified of the basis for a determination that conversion to reclaimed water service will be required,as well as the proposed conditions and schedule for conversion. (2) NOTICE. The notice of the preliminary determination,including the proposed conditions and time scheduleforcompliance.andareclaimedwaterpermitapplicatimshallbeseatto the water muwmerbycertified mail. (3)OBJECTIONS. The water cusmmermay file a notice of objection with the City Manager within thirty (30)days after any notice of determination to comply is delivered or mailed to the customer,and may request reconsideration of the determination ormodifirarm,ofthe proposedcondidons orschedule forconversion.The objection most be in writing and specify the reasons for the objection. The preliminary determination shall be feral if the customer does not file a timely objection. The City Manager shall appoints panel of three(3)staff members who shall review the objection and shall confirm,modify or abandon the preliminary determination. The panel shall make a final determination within thirty(30)days of the filing of the notice of objection. (d)DEVELOPMENT AND WATER SERVICE APPROVALS: • (1) CONDITIONS. Upon application by a developer, owner a water customer (herein referred to as '.applicant')for a tentative map,subdivision map,land use permit,or other development project as defined by Government Code section 65928, the City Manager shall review the Mw=Plan and make a preliminary determination whether the cent or proposed use of the iubjectproperty requires it to be served with reclaimed waterer mincludefacilities designed toaccommodate theuseofreclaimed waterin Chef d re,duetoitslocation widhinan misting mpmposedtechtmed waterservice area Based upon such determination.apermitfmsuch use may be required as a condition of approval of any such application,in addition to any other conditions of approval or service. (2)ALTERATIONS AND REMODELING. On a case by case basis,upon application for apermit for the alteration or remodeling of mute-family,commercial orindustrial smum es,the City Manager shall review the Master Plan and make a preliminary determination whether the subject property is within a reclaimed water service area(existing or proposed)and shall be served with reclaimed water a include facilities designed to accommodatetheuseofreclaimedwarerinthefmme.Baseduponsuchdetenninadnnthatuseofreclaimedwater and provision of reclaimed water distribution systems or other facilities for the use of reclaimed warn is appropriate,a permit for such use may be required as a condition of approval of the application (3)REQUESTED SERVICE. Onacarebycasebasis,uponapplicationfmrapv nmusereclaimedwater on a properly not covered by Sermons 64.0807(d)(1)and(d)(2)above,the City Menaga shall review the Master Plan and make adetermination whetherthe subject property shall be served with rechtimed water. Basedupat • suchdetermination,the application forthepermitshallbeacceptedaudprocessedsubjectto Secton64.0807(e). (4)NOTICE OF DETERMINATION. A notice of the basis for the preliminary determination,proposed Water 99 Building Sunai ble Comrwader conditions of approval and schedule for compliance shall be provided in the applicant prior in approval of the development application,or application for water service. (e)RECLAIMED WATER PERMIT PROCESS: Upon a final determination by the City that a property shall be served with reclaimed water or adoption of a condition of development approval or water service requiring use or accommodation of the use of reclaimed water,the water customer,owner m applicant shall obtain a reclaimed water permit. (1)PERMIT CONDITIONS. The permit shall specify the design and operational requirements fro the applicant's water distribution facilities and schedule far compliance,based on the rules and regulations adopted pursuant to Section 64.0808(a)and shall require compliance with both the California Department of Health Services Wastewater Reclamation Criteria(see California Code of Adminisuauve Regulations,Title 22),and requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board (2)PLANAPPROVAL.PlaosfmthcrccWmedandnon-reclaimedwamrdisuibutionsystemsforWepamel shall be=viewed by the City and a field inspection conducted before the permit is granted (3)PERMTTISSUANCE Upon approval of plans the permit shall be issued Reclaimed water shall not be supplied ma property until inspection by the City determines thattheapplicantis in compliance with theperutit conditions. (f)TEMPORARY USE OF POTABLE WATER. At the discretion of the City,potable water may be made available on a temporary basis,will reclaimed water is available. Before the applicant receives temporary potable water,areclaimed waterperutit,as described in Section 64.0807(c),most be obtained for new on-site distribution facilities. Prior to commencement of reclaimed water service,an inspection of the on-site facilities will beconducted mverify that the facilideshave been ma mminedand are incompliancewiththerecLumedwater permit and current requirements for service. Upon verification of compliance,reclaimed water shall be served to the parcel fro the intended use. If the facilities are not in compliance,the applicant shall be notified of the corrective actions necessary and shall have at leas thirty (30)days to take such actions prim in initiation of enforcement proceedings. (g)RECLAIMED WATER RATE: The rue charged for reclaimed water shall be established by resolution of the City. SEC.64.0909 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM (a)RULES AND REGULATIONS. The City Manager shall establish general rules and regulations governing the use and distribution of reclaimed water. (b)PUBLIC AWARENESS PROGRAM.The City Managershallestablish a comprehensive waterreelamapon --� public awareness program. t� Warr 100 Dowling aunaum¢r.amnwimiei (c)COORDINATION AMONG AGENCIES. The City Manager shall coordinate efforts between the City and other regional agencies to share in the production and utilisation of reclaimed water,where the potential exist. (d)FINANCING PROGRAMS. The City Manager may,through the Master Plan,or other program,identify resources,and adopt measures to assist water users in the financing of necessary conversions mandated by this ordinance. SEC.64.0809 REGULATIONS OF WASTE DISCHARGE TO SEWAGE SYSTEMS (a)INTENT: The City recognizes that to maimain adequate wastewater quality for weterrecizmetion treatment processes, and to protect public and private properry, restrictions may be required on certain indusmal, commercial and residential waste discharges ton sewerage system that is located within a designated mbutay, area of an existing or planned reclamation facility. (b)ADOPTED TRIBUTARY PROTECTION MEASURES: Waste discharges to the sewage system from any industrial, commercial or residential source may be restricted or prohibited by ordinance upon a finding, following a noticed public hearing,that the type or class of discharge involved is capable of causing or may cause . substantial damage or harm to any sewage treatment or reclamation facility or to any significant user or users or potential user or users of reclaimed water within an area which has been planned for reclaimed water service. (Municipal Code section 64.0514) SEC.64.0810 VALIDITY If any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid the remainder of the ordinance and the application of such provisions m other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force on the thirtieth day from and after its passage. APPROVED: IOHN W.WITp,City Attorney By: Rudolf Hradecky Deputy City Attorney RH:mb 06/16/99 06Q6/89 COR.COPY Or.Dept:W.Udl • 0-89-241 Form=o.none Winer 101 CITY OF SANTA BARBARA BE 1 o 1987 ORDINANCE NO. 4485 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA BARBARA ADDING CHAPTER 14.23 TO TITLE 14 OF THE SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO RECLAIMED WATER. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA BARBARA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Title 14 of the Santa Barbara Municipal Code is amended by adding Chapter 14.23 which reads as follows: Chapter 14.23 RECLAIMED WATER Sections: 14.23.010 Policy. 14.23.020 Requirement to Use Reclaimed Water. 14.23.030 Determination, Time Schedule for Compliance, Review. 14.23.010 Policy. , `✓ It is the policy of the City of Santa Barbara that reclaimed water be used wherever it is available in confor- mance with California Water Code Sections 13550 and 13551. (Ord. 4485 , 1987) 14.23.020 Requirement to Use Reclaimed Water. A person or public agency, as used in California Water Code Section 13551, shall not use water from any source of quality suitable for potable domestic use for the irrigation of greenbelt areas when suitable reclaimed water is. available as provided in Section 13550. (Ord. 4485 , 1987) 14.23.030. Determination, Time Schedule for Compliance, Review. The Public Works Director shall review the facts and make a preliminary determination pursuant to California Water Code Section 13550 if a parcel or parcels of land are required to comply with Section 14.23.020 and establish a time schedule for compliance. A notice of that preliminary determination and a time schedule for compliance shall be sent to the owner of the parcel(s) using for this purpose, the last known name and address of such owners as shown upon the last Assessment Roll of the County of Santa Barbara. Any notice by the Public Works Director under this Section ORDl:ab -I- shall be deemed given when properly addressed and deposited into the United States mail with postage fully pre-paid or personally delivered to the owner. The owner may £ile a notice of objection which must be in writing, must specify the reasons for the objections and must be filed with the Public Works Director within twenty (20) days after it is . given or mailed to the owner. The preliminary determination and time schedule for compliance shall be final if the owner does not file a timely objection. The Public Works Director or his designee shall meet with the owner to attempt to resolve the objections. If the objections cannot be re- solved to the mutual satisfaction of the City and owner, the Public Works Director shall give the owner a final deter- mination and make a request that the Regional Water Quality Control Board and any other appropriate agencies conduct a hearing to determine if the parcel or parcels must use reclaimed water pursuant to Water Code Sections 13550 and 13551. (Ord. 4485 , 1987) Bill No. 4478 Ordinance No. 4485 Adopted December 1, 1987 i ORD1sab �3� _ C I T Y O F .S A N T A B A R B A R A INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM a: March 10, 1992 DEPARTMENT OF: Public works TO: See Distribution Below / FROM: David H. Johnson, Public Works Director @v111y SUBJECT: RECLAIMED WATER USE REQUIREMENTS I�N� Due to the termination of the Drought Condition by City Council on March 3 , 1992, certain reclaimed water policies have been amended. Below are the changes to the City's reclaimed water policies: 1. The use of potable water for cleaning, irrigation and construction purposes, including dust control, settling of backfill, flushing plumbing lines, and washing of equipment is no longer prohibited. Therefore, fire hydrant meters are available for all these uses. 2. All contractors should be encouraged to use reclaimed water when their operation is close to a reclaimed water fill station. (Reclaimed water is still cheaper than potable water. ) There are now four charged fill stations on the Phase II main line available for use, plus the existing ones on Phase I. (see attached maps) . Note, that two of the Phase II fill stations are for City Staff use only. \/ All trucks which are currently using a reclaimed water meter and request a fire hydrant meter, must be inspected by Henry Snow, Reclaimed Water Inspector, prior to a fire hydrant meter being issued. 3 . It is still the City's policy that reclaimed water be used wherever it is available in conformance with California Water Code Sections 13550 and 13551, pursuant to Santa Barbara Municipal Code, Section 14.23 .010. Recently, California Water Code Section 13350 was amended and now declares that the use of potable water for non-potable uses, including irrigation of cemeteries, golf courses, parks, and highway landscaped areas, -and industrial and agricultrual irrigation use, is a waste .or an unreasonable use of water. Potable water is prohibited for these uses if reclaimed water is available. Any proposed reclaimed water user sites should be referred to Alison Whitney, Water Conservation specialist. All changes to the reclaimed water system (including modifications to existing sites) must be reviewed by Henry Snow, Reclaimed Water Inspector. 4 . As stated in the permit from the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board, trucking reclaimed water for landscape irrigation purposes in the City is only allowed during a Drought Condition. Therefore, all existing permits for trucking reclaimed water for landscape irrigation should be revoked and permits for this use should no longer be issued. RECLAIMED WATER USE REQUIREMENTS March 10, 1992 Page 2 if you have any questions regarding the City's reclaimed water policies, please contact Alison Whitney, Water Conservation Specialist, at extension 5574. Thank you AW/nro Attachment Venwae2LMO4 CANON PERDIDO STREET r BOYS AND w W ARMY GIRLS H NATIONAL CLUB GUARD Q Z F 2' HOOKUP z Q 1 1/2' HOOKUP K Q Or Q DE LA GUERRA STREET . HOURS OF OPERATION e A.M. TO B P.M. LOADING STATION 1 a 2' HOOKUP w MONTECITO STREET w Q z F z Q Q a • HOURS OF OPERATION °"`" °" 6 A.M. TO 8 P.M. LOADING STATION 2 ` IR, MONTECITO COUNTRY � CLUB. OLD COAST HIGH 2' HOOKUP U NICIPAL T=NNIS COURTS DRAINAGE DITCH D.I. U. S. HIGHWAY 101 • HOURS OF OPERATION 24 HRS. LOADING STATION 3 RAll.ROAD SACKS � Y HOOKUP op F STREET o9 PUNTp GOROp oy 20 O CR9ESTROOM ;13/� OO Fi� DWIGHT MURPHY PARK HOURS OF OPERATION 24 HRS LOADING STATION 4 a/+o/o R0.Wf+.OWC �QW W N¢� mN CABRILLO BOULEVARD r O CRASS < GRASS L SY �W a PALM PARK PARKING LOT DRIVEWAY 2" HOOKUP IN TO BEACH BAND MEDIAN BETWEEN PARKING LOT AND BIKEWAY •SAND'•::..:..;..;.•:•:: •: BIKEWAY . HOURS OF OPERATION:.,.'.: ; BEACFI.::;':.•:::•:;: :::::. .. . .;:•..•......•.•.:...:•'::; :::.:':: :. s A.M. To e P.M. LOADING STATION 5 2• HOOKUP IN SANTA BARBARA THE PLANTER AND STREET CITY COLLEGE SHORELINE DRIVE PLANTER } Q 3 o: 0 m o: Q x . HOURS OF OPERATION owee+ er. ILAYGCINN 6 A.M. TO 8 P.M. LOADING STATION 6 Aa� d MUNICIPAL ° TENNIS STONECREEK couRTs CONDOMINIUMS 2' HOOKUP U7 Q N O N 0= } Ln 3 Q ~ LAS POSITAS a = FRIENDSHIP PARK w J N v • HOURS OF OPERATION s A.M. TO a P.M. LOADING . STATION 7 2' HOOKUP \ SANTA BARBARAI EARL WARREN GOLF CLUB SHOWGROUNDS x r -- -- -- ------- CALLE REAL o L - ------------ 4 H U.S. HIGHWAY 101 0 a V a J s HOURS OF OPERATION DRAW BY. WAR A.M. TO a P.M. LOADING STATION 8 DnDi RQWf3.DFD 2' HOOKUP IN SIDEWALK 5-9 3—8 ADJACENT TO CURB O 1938 ELISISE WAY x O SIDEWALK Q O ELISE WAY cD w r- - -- - - -- -- - - -1 L -- ---- - ----- -J • HOURS OF OPERATION 6 A.M. TO 8 P.M. LOADING STATION 9 BARCELONA DRIVE 2' HOOKUP IN SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO CURB 1 • IX 0 TEE 0 In Tom . I I � . z IrOR SIT`! SIAFr VADLLDEY o I .USE 0PJLY ! ! PARK L-------------J J • HOURS OF OPERATION 6 A.M. TO 8 P.M. LOADING STATION 10 oM». ar KAYCGNM anon: xarrtaowc '-� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS - .1 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 10 EW6 AVER E FWWAIN VALLEY.GLIFOFNN WM2 127 p141 ME 411 RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS AUGUST 12, 1992 - 7:30 P.M. F. FUND NC 919E JT 015T WINNING CAPITAL \ PROCESSING DATE 6125/92 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 - - - - - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY --- -- --- ---------� CLAIMS PAID 07/Ol/92 POSTING DATE 07/01/92 WARRANT NO.. YERCOP AMOUNT DESCRIPTION _.__...._... 122993 ASR ANALYSIS $960.00 ENGINE OIL ANALYSIS 12299E A T { T $1.505.68 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES--- - 12299J ANI:P ILAN 1ELEPHOM[ L ICL[6PAFM il•509.60 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 122996 A T t I 9179.37 LONG SERVICES CB TBLBPX0N6 BBRVIC68 12299E .. . ACCU•LA03 RESEARCH .INC - 6. f50.OD - LAB AGREEMEN ---- -- ------ 122999 AIR ME CAODYCIR {FILTECALR IN $ $1.439.00 OEM AGREEMENT PA OYY OEN KYKT. M.0.6-9-99 12299E RMERIC/N AIR FELTER INC 519522.76 MECHANICAL PARTS a 123001 ROBCO INC l/CP AYCRIGN SEALS 1157.22 MSC2UUflCALPART PARTS- n' 1230C1 AVER ICAR SIEYA f157.22 METER PARTS fTl 1270E2 AFCRICAN I7PE CULTURE COLLICTh f990.25 LAB SUPPLIES a t7 123004 . CHARLES _ . VENAND ..CONSTRUCTION f14090.00 MECHANICAL SEWER REPAIREPAIRS DIET-0.----- a 12300E CNAULES E. ANOFRS ON $571.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 123006 A-FLUS •S MECH L FACNINE. INC. .207.26 BHA"C REPAIRS m 12300E A•PL US SYSIE/E f3$205.00 SERVICE 6 ADS REE -- ---- I+7 123008 ABC LAB CRI STRUM $101.00 INSTRUMENT AGREEMENT 3 12JDDK ARIZONA INSTRUMENT .100.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS # .12300E_ _..__ -ASSOC- TEO - SOILS . ONSULTANIN6 . .. _. i39100.00 -.. . ._ --BOIL TL CLAG -- ADMINISTRATOR 00 123011 ASSOC. ADPINI S. l SULSUL CONSULTANTS f105.00 MEDICAL LIMNS PRESCRIPTION CRDS 123011 ASS . ELAN t CONSULT. l7$150.00 EMPLOYER PRESCRIPTION CARDS 1 - 123613 ASS000 AC0.ILIS L CONS LL lAN 75 9150.00 CEMPLOYERONFERENCE PRESCRIPTION CARDS.+ PRINTING- ]a 123013 ANNAUTO .701.00 TRUCK REGISTRATION r 12301E AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT IE$, . CO s2$392.62 TRUCK PARTS _ r 12301E ._. AUTOCCN . IRDUSTR I[S -INC .. f$50.59 - AWARD IC-PARTS 12301E AU ARCS 1 IRCPPIE3 20.5E AWARD PLAQUES NC4 123018 BC AR SAFETY AI S3.$39.00 LAB BUPPLIPL 12301E .. .. BAY .. SAFETY L SURELY _. .____ 128.00 _ _ BAFKTY N TELIE9-_-_-_.__._ 123020 BACKFLDW CONTROLS PREVENTION COMPANY f12S.0D BACRPLON TESTING .� 123021 BAILLY CONTROLS COMPANY .130.7E TOLL '•-' 123022 .. BANANA SLLCPRINT _. ._ - 21.767.42. . . . _..__.. BLUEPRINTING M.0.IRIBUTIO e f7 123022 B BITEY IL f600.00 BATTERIES COMP DISTRIBUTION (n 123023 BATTERY 3PECISLI1ES 17.036.71 BATTBRIBS 12302E .. '.._.. BAYTES [ISTATIONER INC {7.349.95 - ._ -.-._. . .LAB eUPPLIPL 12302E ROBERT$ STATIONERS 800.00 ENGINE SUPPLIER 12302E BORE Ai BE tN GE -INC FPO3T $297.00 1" SUERINO SERVICES 5-30 123020 J L H SERGE C $619.70 _ _ __. TRUCK KUPARTS ._. 12302E YI BILL/NC AIC $629.90 TRUCK PARTS 12302E BIC•PRC L/ECR/7CPIC5 $156.61 LhsSERVICE IUPP1IR9 123031_ B L 7EChRONI LED• INC .. 9285.00 _ 88RVICE ADATEIIDISK MAINTENANCE _.-- 123031 BOINDERSP DATA MAINTENANCE f28K.00 CONSTRUE DATA DISK MAINRKNANCB 123032 BRINK ER SON COUP $41$20.225.99 CON_ENGINEERING SERVICES 123033 . BRCYL 1 [ALCYELL CONSULTING {2S.22J.90 _. __-. _. _.KNGIN88RING BERVICKB.dr.lil._--_ 123035 BLIL[ER•D ASSOCIATES f291.00 SURVEYING 123036 BUSH AND RSSCCIATES INC $0.011.00 PNO .RZIMBES IMEN -- -91 12303E .. . ._. . GURY 6 .. $TREED P _ 30.011.12 PETTYETT{' (SUPPLIIMBUR88NBNT-__-- 123037 CUTLER PAPER COMPANY 1562.2E OFFICE SUPPLIES 12303E L L 1 COFFLNICATtONS .92.2E OFFICE SUPPLIES 3a N FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WINKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6125/92 PAGE 2 e REPORT NUMBER AP A3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY .. .. ._ .._ _. _._._....__ ._.__ CLAIMS PAID 07/0T/01/92 POSTING OATH O7101/92 WARRA61_110._.__ ._.. . . . ... VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 123039 C N I 2998.97 ELECTRIC PARTS 123040 CS CCKPARY $1.819.73 VAL" .. .... .. 123041 CALTRCL INC $379.70 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 123042 CALIFIRAIP ALAC CCLLISICN INC $1,321.56 TRUCK REPAIRS 123043 .. _. CALIFCRKII AUTORATIC GAIT $297.10 SERVICE AGRRBMENT. .. .. . . .. ..—__. 123044 CA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY $1.023.42 COOPERATIVE BIOASBAY RESEARCH 123045 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $130,992.02 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-30, PI-20 Oa 123046 CENTLRY SAFETY INST 6 SURF $16.662.04 SAFETY SUPPLIES [D . ... .....__ ..._._ m 1230A7 CERTIFIED ABSTRACTS ISE $300.00 SUBS OIL Z 12J0AS "HEM ICAL AB SIPAC 75 SERVICE f390.00 SUBSCRIPTION t7 123049 CHEVRON USA INC.. f5.395.78 OIL ]a 123050 CITY WIRE CLOTH INC f17.31 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 123051 .COLIC" ARC SCNS $1.894.053.00 CONSTRUCTION I-9 --1 123052 CCPPLSA. INC.. $2.162.22 COMPUTER MARIHIME/801TNARE_... m 1230!3 CCRNELL CP FARTS / DIV $127.58 TRUCK PARTS 3 123054. CON-WAY LESTERN EKFRESS $79.49 FREIGHT # 123055 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL .DIST f7.5B1.91 BLECTRIC SUPPLIES 123DEG CONTAINERIZED CHEMICAL DISPC $190.00 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL 00 I23057 CCKTI6ENTIL AIR TOILS INC $3.742.09 TOOLS 1 1230!9 CCKIIKCRTIL . CHEMICAL CC f4.848.75 .. .. CHLORINE M.O.10-19-91 123059 CONE-LABS 91.350.00 LAB SUPPLIES a 123060 - COSTA MESA. AUTO SUPPLY 9927.51 TRUCK PARTS . r 123961 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 918.667.00 BALES TAX PAYMENT. r 123062 DAILY PILOT $50.00 NOTICES 6 ADS t$ 123063 CAPES A PCCRE $55.003.79 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38-3 123064 J.L. C-ANEELC CC INC $2,122.60 PIPE_.. 12306 OAK 11RC SERVICE N3. TIRES A 123066 STORM DATA SAORM f76.0000 COMPUTER SOFTWARE321 123067 PETER C 06VCR CO i136.387.60 VALVES 3v20-2_........— 12306E DE2URIM AKO/IP CS CO $2.264.26 VALVIB N 123070 DIATIC EKY IRCSPEIAAL f2.269.2E PRIMING N.O.10-9-91 123071 DIGILIPPG ASSCCIA ACS $75.95 PRINTING SERVICES 123072 DIGITAL COUI PN CNT COMP f56$146.93 COMPUTER NETWORK SERVICES M.O.1-9-92 123073 SYCONDIVER COMP S785.93 OFPIOB BUPPLI88 123073 DIVERSIFIED IKSPEC710N SS.705.31 _. CRANE MAINTENANCE_._ 12307A DCPACC ER7CRFPISI3 INC f16.278.00 PLANT MAINTBES b REPAIRS 123079 DLRN ECIIP OS C[AP 33$749.64 PAINT SUPPLIER 123077 DURO-SEKSIINS COMP s799.55 MECHANICAL PARTS__,. ..._._. 123078 OWYER INSTRUMENT INC $299.13 INSTRUMENT BUPPLI88 12307E O-VALS SALES f196.06 FITTINGS 123060 EASTPAN INC i0d94.09 OFFICE 8NPP6IEB 123021 ECCAPALYSIS INC $1.708.56 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.7-17-91 123001 SLICING NIEH VICIIP IA TER. $1.708.01 LAB SUPPLIES 123083 ENCHANT AU NIRICS INC $2.940.00 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES „ 123083 ENCHANTER INC 92.680.00 LAB S MONITORING M.O.7-17-91 127084 ENSECO•CALLAB f2.6B0.O0 LAB SUPPLIES N W FULa NC 9199 JT GIST YCPNIR6 CAPITAL FROCESSING DATE 6/25/92 FAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP 93 .- _.. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY - .- -- -- CLAIMS PAID 07101192 POSTING DATE 07/01/92 .WARRANT NO..._.-.._... VERCCR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION --.-..-.- 123005 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSCC $1,099.56 LAB SERVICES --123986 -.- ERCELLENCE IN TRAINING 5906.00 PUBLICATION 123087 MARSHALL FAIRPES 5178.O6 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 123088 JCHN 9 FALKENSTEIN PE 33.400.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9. 1-I6 123019- __ FECEPAL IRPPESS COPP *370.25 AIR FREIGHT 123090 FERRELLCAS 1153.09 PROPANE 123091 - FILTER SUPPLY CO $514.34 CHLORINATION PARTS 3. - 123092 . . : _ .. FISCHER S PORTER CO $784.38 CHLORINATION PARTS .. . ......._.__.,_ m 123093 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO $1.057.73 LAB SUPPLIES Z 123094 FISORS IhSTRUPEN7S SIO.388.50 LAB EQUIPMENT t% ... 123055 - FLC.SVSIEPS. . . $333.92 PLUMBING SUPPLIES.. n 123096 FCRBES CCFPUTIP GROUP INC $9.862.36 COMPUTER SYSTEMS 123097 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA 535.21 FILM - 123095 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $1.620.00 HASARD0UN WASTE DISCLOSURES FIT 193099 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $570.56 PAINT SUPPLIES 3 123100 FIX ENTERPRISES $1,825.00 SAFETY CONSULTANT *k 223191----., ..__ .FCR.-INDLSTRIAL SALES - $103.70 PAINT SUPPLIES OO 123102 ThE FOSECRO CO 593.78 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 123103 FREDSON BY SUPPLY $39.80 TRUCE PARTS 1 123104 ._ .. BUD FRET - . .. .. . . 571.16 - DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION. n 123109 GCS SERVICE $163.58 - LAB SUPPLIES r 123106 GARAht LLPSER CO 5260.71 HARDWARE/LUMBER r 1231C7 - GAUGE PIPPIN SERVICE $377.04 - - INSTRUMENT REPAIR_.._____- 123100 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CC. $948.81 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES C 123109 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO S4.33B.75 TELEPHONE SERVICES N 123110 - GENOSTS BIOTECHNOLOGIES _. $3.077.75 _ ._ . . _ LAB SUPPLIES --1 123111 LIFE IECHRCLOGIES/GIBCO/BRL $121.52 LAB SUPPLIES A 123212 GIERLICN•PITCHELL INC $15,348.12 MBCHRNICAL PARTS 122113 -GRAPI-IC C1SINIEUTERS S443.93 . . . .. FILM ,i 123119 DAVID R. GRIFFIN $9.000.00 LEGAL SERVICES Cn 123115 HS TYPE S GRAPHICS 510.78 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123116_ _. . .GECRGE T WALL CO 21.698.86 MOTORS _ ... .._._. ...__._, .__... 123117 FRED A RAPPER $1.500.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 122110 HARPIRGICP IRDUSTRIAL FLASH S1.O96.39 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 123119 HAULAWAV CONTAINERS - 52.709.00 -_ TRASH RRHOVA4. .__._. 123120 EG HELLER.S SON INC $63.02 TOOLS 123121 HOERRIGER CVS CALIF INC S394.05 MECHANICAL PARTS 123122 . . J.T. HORVATH R ASSOC. 53.000.00 CONSTRUCTION 0ERVIC83 J-23-1. J-17. . 123123 RS HUGHES CC INC $246.97 PAINT SUPPLIES 1231F4 CITY OF PLRIIREICN BEACh 317.233.56 WATER USE 123125 .. .. MUNTIR6TCR VALLEY SCHWINN C $172.18 .. BICYCLE PARTS 123126 ICC INSTRUMENT $46.73 METER 123127 I.G. INDUSTRIAL CORP. $3.133.87 CHEMICALS _.123128.___. ._ . IMPERIAL .LEST - CHEMICAL 332.155.90 FERRIC CHLORIDE.M.O.II-19e34. -_._._ 123129 IR-CICE TECMNCLOSIES INC $389.12 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 123130 IhCUSIRIAL TPREADED PRODUCTS 9246.96 CONNECTORS A W Y FUND NC 9199 - JT GIST 6CPRINE CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/25/92 PAGE K y� REPORT NUMBER AP93 C CUK I SANITATION DISTl/92 ACTS OF CDANOC COUNTY CLAIMS PAID OT/0l/92 POSTING DATE O7101192 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 123131 IRCRAP PAPER 92,595.60 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123132 INTERPOLKIAlk SCIENTIFIC CORF $7.080.12 LAB SUPPLIES 123133 INSTRUMENT SPECIALISTS $7,000.00 LAB SUPPLIES 12313E J 1 M SERVICE 5117.08 TRUCK PARTS . 123135- J 8 W SCIENTIFIC .. $552.20 LAB SUPPLIES 123136 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY $OPP $999.83 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 123157 JAYS CAIFPIRC $662.29 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSES 123130 JET FCRP CORP. $518.06 COMPUTER SOFTWARE . ..__. . ... n 123139 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $968.22 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES m 123140 MARLEE COMPANY $339.27 PAINT SUPPLIES Z .1231E1 KELLEY BLLE BOCK $137.92 BVBBCRIPTION p 123142 KING REAPING INC $588.45 MACHINE SUPPLIES Y 123103 XRCP IhCLSTSIAL SUFFLIES $1.854.99 TOOLS 123199 MARTIN KCROICK SR 11.993.75 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 ... 123145 LEEWARD SHELVING t FILE SYS. 5191.90 OFFICE SUPPLIES M 123146 LIFECOM-SAFETY SERVICE SUPPL $118.14 SAFETY SUPPLIES 3 123147 LIMITOROUE CARP 52.526.46 MECHANICAL REPAIR 123148 KP LINCSIPCN INC 52.905.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - NPDES PERMIT 4h 223159 SCCC-LYKCH CCRF $583.40 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 00 123150 MOT FICLCEIC CCPPARY $245.76 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT _. 1 123151 SUSAN MURCOTT $3.242.45 CONSULTING SERVICES - ENVIRONMENTAL 123192 MPS 3920.31 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 123153 MACOPCO 5728.89 INSTRUMENT r 123159 MAINTENANCE PROCLCTS INC $2,353.56 MECHANICAL PARTS r 1231!5 VARIER $211.10 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES C7 193156 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $67.95 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIER N 123157 MATT - CMLOR INC $3.176.52 CHLORINATION PARTS --A123158 MEASUREMENT CONTROL SYS INC 5920.O4 INSTRUMENT PARTS 123159 MECHANICAL SEAL NEFAIN 1151.31 PUMP PARTS 1231E0 PICRCAGE IF CERRITCS $741.41 INSTRUMENT PARTS 125161 PIn Al PIT a PACKINIhG $18.824.62 MECHANICAL PARTS N 123162 MIIChELL INTERNATIONAL INC 5116.3T PUBLICATION 123163 MITCHELL PACIFIC CONSTRUCTORS $26.160.38 CONSTRUCTION 7-11-2 123163 JAMES M MONTGOMERY $4.756.21 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.12-12-90 1231E5 MCNTGOMERV LABORATORIES 115.537.00 LAB BERVICSB. _. .. _.__- 123166 RUSTING UNITS COMPANY $213.00 HARDWARE 123167 K672CAAL 9AKIIARY SUFFLV 1219.09 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 123168 . NEWARK CLECTRCNICS $766.95 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES . . .. ... .__.. .. .__. 123169 CITY OF NEWPORT REACH 111.15 WATER USE 123170 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES 5678.86 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY GLASSES 123171 OFFICE PAVILION/INTERIOR RES $62.92 OFFICE FURNITURE 123172 CA SYSTEPS CC 117.564.37 CHLORINE M.O.30-30-91 123173 OPERATION TLCHNCLOGY INC $850.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 123174 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C $274.36 TRUCE PARTS _ _.. ._ ..._. . _ . 123175 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO $2.797.12 CHEMICALS 123176 ORANGE VALVE a FITTING CC. 52.195.75 PLUMBING SUPPLIES F n '` 40 9199 • JT GIST WORKING CAFIIAL PROCESSING DATE 6/25/92 PAGE 5( REPORT NUMBER AP43 - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY - -- ---- - ------ CLAIMS PAID 07/01/92 POSTING DATE 07/01/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION _. . - __. _..... 123177 OXYGEN SERVICE $6.119.58 SPECIALTY GASSES 123178 COUNTY OF ORANGE $8.502.94 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT .. __._ __ ... 123179 CSCOC SELF.FUNOFO PEDICAL I $100,000.00 SELF-FUNDED HEALTH PLAN PREMIUM ADVANCE 123120 CCLNIT 50NITA711N CISTPICT $4.245.22 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE 123181 PACE REPFERSFIP VAREMOUSE 185.00 MEMBERSHIP FEE 123182 PACIFIC ENERGY RESOURCES SI03.000.00 OIL WELL ABANDON/CLEAN-UP M.0.10-9-91 123283 PACIFIC PARTS $0.343.60 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 0a 123184 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMEKT CC 965.90 SAFETY SUPPLIES 123185 PACIFIC FELL 2668.96 TELEPHONE SERVICES m /23166 PACIFIC ULK-IN PEDICAL $980.00 MEDICAL EXAMS m 123187 - PACTEL PERIOIAN SYSTEMS $8.609.18 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONa..._____.-_._ C7 123188 PAM WEST $1.101.15 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES n 123189 PARAGON CABLE 346.18 CABLE SERVICES .� 123190 PARTS UNLIMITED $1.336.00 TRUCK PARTS --I 1231S1 - RCY PENCERBRAFT $460.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION m 123192 PENKIN-ELDER CORPORATION 21.906.25 LAB SUPPLIES 123193 PERNA PURE PRODUCTS INC 18.328.60 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIER. # 123194 PETLAND PAVILION $96.91 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 00 123195 PICKLICK PAPER $67.88 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123196. PIPA GRC SYSTEMS INC 1110.607.22 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 . _.....__. .._. 123197 PIONEER BANK $17.471.94 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 5-34-3 ?0 123198 PITNEY BONES $183.10 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE Y- 123199 POLTMLTRICS. INC. $954.50 EQUIPMENT RENTAL F 123200 POLYPURE INC $21.770.24 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 O 123201 POSITIVE FCRRULATORS, INC. 9242.30 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES 1232C2 PRECISICK INOLSTRIES .. 920.81 - - - FITTINGS (n 123203 - HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $196.00 ICE -1 123204 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. $4.269.00 SOIL TESTING 70 123205 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. $4.720.00 _ INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTI91 U-0-1- 231_ n 123206 PRO LAB OIAGNCSTICS 1230.94 LAB SUPPLIES 123207 AQUA-CHEF. INC $1.630.71 BOILER PARTS CC/ 1232L8 SIEVE. P. 6)CES. INC. $1.049.287.00 CONSTRUCTION 19o1-1A-.S. fi_I=I¢.. .-_..._-.. 323209 RAIAIR INSTRUMENT CO $685.06 LAB SUPPLIES 123210 RECTC INC $42,955.59 RESIDUALS REMOVAL H.0.7-13-91 123211 RED LINE ENTERPRISE $520.00 _..... . .. . STREET.SWEEPING__ - 123212 RED WING SHOES $331.07 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 123213 RECI EVPFESS $97.65 MESSENGER SERVICES 123219. THE REGISTER $682.50 _ NOTICES 8 ADS -- 123215 MCJUNKIN.REPUBLIC SUPPLY S202T.58 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 123216 RESTER CORP 9126.31 LAB SUPPLIES 123217 - ROBINSON FERTILIZER CO _ ... 1995.07 _. ._ GROUNDSKEEPINQ SUPPLIES ___- _ 123218 RCSEPCUKIILNILCC $1.575.69 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 123219 PICOT RLPF $540.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION -123220 _ .. JOSEPH T BYERSCN L SCN IN $1.891.66 METAL 123221 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP $242.25 PARTS CLEANER 123222 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $3,683.12 PLUMBING SUPPLIES CT FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST YCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/25/92 PAGE 6 _ REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY CLAI SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAWPAID S PA IO 07/01/92 POSTING GATE 07/01/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 123223 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT-L 3295.707.62 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-12-91 123224 _ SCCTT CCPFARY $3.065.00 TRUCK SCALE REPLACEMENT M.O.5-8-91__._.. 123225 SEA COAST DESIGNS $110.93 OFFICE SUPPLIES 12322E SEAVEKTLRES 21,128.50 OCEAN MONITORING 123227 . SERPEKTIN CONVETCR_ .CORP 32.091.02 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES._.___ 123220 SEWER EQUIP CV OF AMERICA f1.383.63 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 123229 SHAMROCK SCIENTIFIC SPEC SYS $120.44 LAB SUPPLIES y _ 123230 SHAMROCK . SUPPLY f133.01 TOOLS G'7 123212 SNASTA ELECTRIC $493.74 ELECTRIC SERVICES m 123233 SIL'RELU CN SALES $5$421.27 TOOLS/MARDWS Z .. 123233__. _ SIGMA CAFPIC RL CO .247.10 LAB SUPPLIES 123235 SILVER] t LE ROUEF $1511674.00 CONSTRUCTION 5-30-3 I23235 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLI 3679.00 SOIL TESTING M PNYBICAL BEAMS _ .123237 SNITM•ERERYIFE CO .072.55 SOIL PLUMBING SUP M.O.7 e17-91 m 12]237 SPITH RIFE t SUPPLY IN[ f1.072.55 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 3 122230 SCNNEhSCNEI6 NATO L RCSENTH S455.00 LEGAL SERVICES - PERSONNEL 123239.. SCUTh CCAST WATER S87.50 WATER USE # 1232A0 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO f316.235.46 POWER 00 123241 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO f8.512.91 DIESEL/UNLEADED FUEL _ -123242 YESTALLCY INC $1.040.41 WELDING SUPPLIES. 123213 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEPS INC $1,093.49 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 12!244 SPECIFUP-PtPAN REECURCE SYS 1900.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION r 123245 SPEK IhOLSTRIES INC $719.1/ LAB SUPPLIES .._ ._. _-___ 123246 STANCO-S VACUUM SERVCE S1.149.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES C/ 123247 STARNA CELLS. INC. 3314.77 LAB SUPPLIES _123298.. STATEYIEE INSTALLERS. .. $1.989.99 _ .. MOVING SERVICES n.LABORATORY.AQUIP COCn 123249 STERLING ART $195.01 OFFICE SUPPLIES __4 323250 STROPHOTNE PRINTING $994.97 PRINTING 70 123251 .. _ SUNSET_. FORD .___ $337.80.. _ .TRUCK PARTS____-__ C-i - 123252 SUPER CHEN CORP $1.209.55 CHEMICALS N 123253 SUPER TECP REFERENCE GUIDE 571.85 PUBLICATION .._123258_ _ .. .... SUPERIOR INTERLOCK CCRP $97.33 _ _ HARDWARE _ 12'.2l5 TAYLCR IRELSIRIAL SCFTWARE $2.387.02 TRAINING REGISTRATION 123256 TEXAS CCPPERCE BAKK $10.731.61 C.O.P. ADMINISTRATIVE PEE _.-123257 _. _ THOMPSON 1NDUSTRIAL.SUPPLY $64.68 .. _ . MECHANICAL BUPPLIKS__. � .._ 123258 THOMSON TECHNOLOGY. INC. $285.42 ELECTRIC PARTS 1232l9 TOhY-S LICK L SAFE SERVICE $602.07 RE-KEY LOCKS ..12326f.. _ .TRAVEL TRAVEL f128.00 TRAVEL SERVICES H.Q•6r12=91 123261 TRUCM A AUiC SUPPLY INC 13V7.S1 TRUCK PARTS 123262 TRUESDAIL LABS 5130.00 ASBESTOS TESTING 123263 . . . .__TUSTIN DODGE $P3.41 _ .. _ . . TRUCK PARTS 123264 TWINING LhSORATCRIES CF 39.1 47.00 PIPE INSPECTION 123265 UPISA f80.00 SUBSCRIPTION _1222E6 . .ULTRA. £Y£TEP1 $1.862.51 ENGIWEERING. 4989E&ES 123267 UNION BA" 52.906.70 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 7-11-2 123268 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $600.06 PARCEL SERVICES CT7 V .. At 9199 JI 018T YfRNiNB CAPITAL ` PROCESSING DATE 6/25/92 PAGE 7� q REPORT NUMBER AP43 ------- -----_ . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/01/92 POSTING DATE 07,01/92 .WARRANT NO. ._ .. VEADON. .. AMOUNT .. _ DESCRIPTION 123269 VLR SCIERItFIt $4.903.10 LAB SUPPLIES 121270 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO $1,916.63 - PLUMBING SUPPLIES ___. ....__ _ _,_....... . 123271 VALUEWARE $189.10 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 123212 VANtER RUIINESS FORMS $695.15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123273. . VARIA , AAALYTICAL INSTRUP1618 $3,596.97 LAS SUPPLIES_. . 123214 VARNER ACCL/11C8. INC. $530.74 BUILDING MATERIALS 123275 VIKI AS IADUSTRIAL SUPPLY $36.83 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 123276 CARL .WARREN A CO $314.18 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR--.. ,m 123277 K.N. SATIS CO $363.39 ELECTRIC PARTS m 123278 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $29.435.44 CAUSTIC SODA H.0.8-8-90 O 123279 RESCC l34.14 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES a 123280 ROURKE S ACODRUFF L ER t03r 912.13 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.2-19-92 123281 XEROX CORP $1.248.08 COPIER LEASES 123282 GEORGE YARDLEY CO 11176.71 VALVES 123283 RAY S VCLNG $5.400.00 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL m 1232e4 RICHARD E EC6AR $240.00 DEFERRED COUP DISTRIBUTION'S 3 W TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 07/01/92 $5.323,996.60 p6aiLii..Ca.OS6sa .. .... a - f SUMMARY _.. _. _ . .. - AMOUNT Cy XI OPEN FUND $1,511.09 X1-CAP PAC FUND _...___. .. _ ._. . ._ __ _. _.. $209,269.23 .. - -I N2 M $70Pa FUND 09 .4 02 CAP FAC FUND . 3 46 .- 43 OPBR POND _. _-... - __. .. _... . ... 020,614610.0d (l X3 CAP FAC FUND - -_ -- -- -- 01$6,524.55 N X5 OPEN FUND 78,635.57 -XS OAP PAC FUND- -.... . . . . .. -. . .. ... 0170,417.96 .. X6 OPEN POND M7 OPEN FUND 0617.9E -- 90 -X7 CAP FAC FUND $32,256. 8 Xll OPEN FUND -_ . __ . .__._.. ___-___. —._.__ X34 OPEN FUND ,131.82 f991,1]1.81 - X566-CAPP- FUND--. . _ _ _.. .. .. _ .i1r 114.9E X866 CAP' FAC FUND 263.66 1667 OPEN E FUND $5,341.13 ___JT 14 OPERPSR FUND _____ . . _. ._. _- _ _.. - _. _._.. ... -.._ _._14,601.29_...._._....- _. FUND CORP $2,32,924.95 -----BEEF-FUNDED INSURANCE HINDS. ......_. 02$133,223.35 JT WORKING CAPITAL 0178.088.67 .. . .-... . _ ._-.._. . ...__.._. ...__-..____—__ .___ T_.___.. .—.......___._. __. ..._.....____ .. __ - -.._..._._.. _._.0........ .60 ivvev . vovvv V I FUND NO 9199 - JT 0151 WORKING CAPITAL RO DATE 7/09/92 PAGE 1 REPEPORTRT NUM NUMBER AP43 COUNTY- CLAI SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/15/92 POSTING GATE Oi/IS/92 WARRANT NO. -- - VENDOR AMOUNT . DESCRIPTION 123311 NAG SYSTEMS $649.73 INSTRUMENT PART 123312 .. AG TECH CCNPAKY $62.894.07 RESIDUALS REMOVAL-N.O.10-9-91 ----- 123313 AON COPP(BATICK $1.884.90 GAUGE 123314 AST" $5.00 PUBLICATION 123315_. _ .._ ._ RP. ADAMS.. COMPANY___.. _ _ $1.826.70 _ _ _ . PLACE 123316 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS INC $1.573.214.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-34-3, P1-35-2 123317 AIR PRODLCTS 6 CHEMICAL IN $33,630.00 O6N AGREEMENT CRY GEN SYST. N.O.8-9-09 y _ L23318 . . _. ALTA . RCEEIWS _ -_ _._ . .. ._ $193.10 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES___ ._-_, G� 123319 ALTSCHUL .CACTI CCRP 1231.00 PUBLICATION .III 123390 ACORDIA BEREFIT SERVICES $14.000.00 ANNUAL AGGREGATE PREMIUM tM 23321__...__.AEERILI N._. INS TETUTC_OL_.._.__. _._ _ ... . ... _. 945.00_ _:.. -PUBLICATION- C �123322 AMERICAN PEOIA INC 3393.95 PUBLICATION a 123323 RCRCO IKC 81CA AVERICAN SEALS $988.28 BARDNARE 123324._ _ _. .._.. AVERICAh SIGFA . __. _ _.._.... . . _. . 31.508.49 _ _ __._ INSTRUMENT-PARTS - ---_--__.- m 323325 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $ 10r TS 0.00 MANMDLE ADJUSTMENTS DIET 2 3 123326 BLAME P ANDERSON 392.0E CELLULAR TELEPHONE REIMBURSEMENT 19332I-..--ASTNCEYES_REC61. B_.RACRINE�INC. .-__. . .. ........ .._..3427.5E__. ..___ ___-NECHRNICAL_RERAIBR__-_ 3k 123328 A-PLUS SISTEPS 31r907.19 NOTICES 6 ADS 00 123329 ARATEN SERVICES INC 36r538.76 UNIFORM RENTALS 123330__ .... _.....ARIZONA . INSTRUMENT__ .. . . ... .. .. . . ... . . .. 5101.25 ._ . .. . _.._. .INSTRUMENT 123331 ARK TECHNOLOGIES $1.920.00 CONSULTING SERVICES D 123332 - ARROW 10LCK BODIES L EQUIP $1.204.38 TRUCK PARTS 1- _123331_. _ .-__ASL._kORN S_......__.___.___-__. ._._.. _ _ __.... __. ._ _ 3197.34__ - _.-_._.__-__PHOTO.PROCESSING--_ r 123334 DEhTAI IKELPARCE CONSULT. 324.00 DENTAL INSURANCE CONSULTANT 123335 RALPH Y ATKINSON $146.47 PUMP PARTS -123336_ ... __ . OFT .PORTABLE SERVICES. . ___ .. . ._.. -3107.75 __ _. .. _. _ _EQUIPMENT w 123337 BRY SAFEIV L SUPPLY $777.90 SAFETY SUPPLIES - 123338. BACKILON PREVENTION DEVICE $32.00 BACKFLON TESTING __123315._- _..--_SALLIh_CCh£TRLCTICM_CO. .__ . ' . .__ _17.535.00.__. . _- _..._ MANHOLE AOJUSTING_QIST_J___ C7 123340 SARAhA PLLEPMINT $6.461.9? BLUSPRINTING M.O.10-10-90 -'� 123341 BARCLAYS LAY PUBLISHERS $52.21 PUBLICATION BATTERY SPECIALTIES . .$681.25_ ._..__ __._ _BATTERIES _ 123343 BANTER DIAGNOSTICS INC $4,849.27 LAB SUPPLIES 123344 BAYLESS S7ATICKERS 325.9E OFFICE SUPPLIES __.123345_ _.. .. .. DER C.BEATIIE. P.E.. ... .. 3800.20'.. _ .. ...__ . _ENGINEERING_SBEVj9A _,__ 123346 ROBERT BE Th WILLIAM FROST $273.60 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-34 123347 BELL SECURITY $106.69 SAFETY CONSULTATION SERVICES 12334E . ..._. . J. E H BERGE INC _ $82.69 _. __ ....._LAB SUPPLIRB 123349 BCEHRINGEP MAKNHEIM $497.64 LAB SUPPLIES 123350 BCISE CA£(ACE CFC PRCCUCTS $249.33 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123351 SCK-A-RUES $463.08 _ TRUCK PARTS_ 123352 BONNEVILLE EQUIP INC $250.00 DOCUMENT RESEARCH 123353 PRENNER-FIEOLER 6 ASSOC IN $267.70 COMPRESSOR 1233-4 BRITHINEE ELECTRIC_ $1.006.39 ELECTRIC MOTOR 123355 BUIL[ER•S EMPCRIUM $27.66 IURUN)IIE/LUMBBE 1233-6 GARY G $TREED 13.256.29 PETTY CASH REINBURSCIOUT _-._ ----------- ,� 1 FUN- NO 9199 • JT DIST WINKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/09192 PAGE 2 N REPORT NUMBED 4P93 - CCUNIV SA ION DISTRICTS OF GRANGE COUNTY - - - -- --- CLAIMS PAID 07/I5/92 POSTING DATE OV 15I92 - WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION .- ... _.._ _. 123357 BUTLER PIPER CCPPAKY $7.694.T9 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123350 CCM CCRPCRATIDN $8,555.71 LAB SUPPLIES 123359 CH2M HILL $5.215.35 ENGINEERING SERVICES 123360 SUMMIT SOLUTIONS. INC S456.44 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 123361 CS COMPANY $59.47 VALVE 123362 CAL-CLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. $01/.59 LAB SUPPLIES 1233C3 CALTROL INC 53.295.13 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 12336E CAPITAL WESTWARD 1254.08 REGULATOR PARTS -. . f17 123365 CENTURY SAFETY INST 0 SUPP 11.259.1! SAFETY BUPPLI68 2 123366 CHEVRON LIN INC 55.990.07 LURE OIL tG 123367-.. . -. CIAO.BELLA $355.56 DIRECTORS' NESTING EXPENSE n 123364 CLEVELAND COTTON PROD $187.03 LAB SUPPLIES 123369 COMPUSA♦ INC. $2.291.80 COMPUTER HARDWARE/90PTNARE 123370 COMPUSERVE 112.60 COMPUTER SBRVICBS m 123371 CONNELL 6M PARTS / DIV 5376.91 TRUCK PARTS 3 123372 CONSCLICPIED ELECTRICAL CIST $9.021.62 SLBCTRIC SUPPLIES -123375- ._ CONTINENTAL AIR -TOCLS INC. .. .. . 53019.09 TOOLS 00 12337E CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO 32.424.38 CHLORINE 123375 CONTRACTORS BOOK STORE 5197.50 PUBLICATION 1 .-_723I76 - CONTROL . CATA CCRP 0/OR $935.50 INSTRUMENT __..._ 123377 CCCPER IRCUSTRIES INC 1914.6E COMPRESSOR PARTS a 123378 CCUNIV 0CLISALE ELECTRIC $126.90 ELECTRIC PARTS Ir- .. ._123379 CRISP PUBLICATIONS. INC 1501.50 PUBLICATION 123390 CROWN FENCE CO 13.336.00 FENCING C 123381 CRYSTAL CLEAR WINDOW PAINT. 52.250.00 WINDOW CLEANING 123302 STATE BCAFC CF EGLILIZATICK $385.27 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK FEES. _ _ cn 123363 STATE WAIIP RESCIPCEE CCATRCI $39.09 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK CLEANUP PRR9 A 123389. DAILY PILCT $95.00 NOTICES 0 ADS 123385 - .. DANIELS TIRE SERVICE $2.311.55 TIRES 123386 _ DEZURIK AND/OR CS CO 5199.8E VALVE PARTS Co 123387 DIALCG IRFORPATION SERVICES S99.14 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 123308 . DIATEC ENSIRCRMERTAL 53.721.1E CHEMICALS .,-----,--_- 123309 DIETERICh POST CO $68.57 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123390 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $3.354.27 PRINTING 123391 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP 928.703.98 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 123352 SYCON CCPP $146.93 PRINTING SUPPLIES 123393 DICNEX CORP. $1.036.95 LAB SUPPLIES 123355 . BERATE E01ERFRI-ES INC 5929.82 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS 123395 ROBERT F DRIVER ASSOC $114.271.00 INSURANCE POLICIBB 123396 DUNN EDWARDS COPP 55.727.56 PAINT SUPPLIES 121397 OVALS SALES $570.85 FITTINGS 123398 DYKALCO CCRIRCLS $3.306.48 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1233SS EPA SERVICES INC 93.684.76 ENGINEERING SERVICES P2-00, 3-23-2 123400 EASTPAN INC S4,171.15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123401 EBERHARD EQUIPMENT $60.69 TRUCK PARTS 123402 EXCELLENCE IN TRAINING $333.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION l>•J 1 N IA W FUND KC 9199 - JT GIST YCPKIRG CIP17AL PROCESSING DATE 7/09/92 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP qJ COUNTY CLAIMS SANITATION DISTRICTS OF UDANEE COUNTY ' CLAIMS PAID 07/15/92 POSTING DATE 07/!S/92 ' .WARRANT RC. YERCCA AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 123403 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE S23.178.70 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.30-9-91 123404 JOHN S FALKENSTEIN PE $3.480.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 123405 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP S221.00 AIR FREIGHT 123406 FEPRELLEAS $140.33 PROPANE 123401 . ._ .. _ .._-FILTER SLFPLV CC.._.. . __ - .. .. $264.79 MECHANICAL PARTS 123408 FISCNER T PCRTER CO $817.54 CHLORINATION PARTS 123409 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO $2.466.78 LAB SUPPLIES L L23410 . _." FLO.SYSTEMS .. 219.369.6E PUMP PARTS m 123411 CLIFFORD A FORREST 110.036.02 SURVEY SERVICES M.O.6-12-91- m 123412 FCUNTAIN VALLEY CAPERA 538.40 FILM O __ 123913_. ...._-. ___.._FCX-IRDL3IPIAL.SALES - S1.631.45 PAINT SUPPLIES 3- 123414 CITY OF FULLERTCN S81.38 WATER USE 123415 GANAHL LUMBER CO $140.09 BUILDING MATERIALS ' 1 12381E GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY i1.gSq.63 CHEMICALS 123417 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO S5B0.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS - 3 123418. GENERAL TELEPHONE CC $383.30 TELEPHONE SERVICES ..._123119—__--. _...GIEALICleKI1CPELL .. IRC.. _. _. _.. S5.884.99 _ .. _ MECRANICAL PARTS __ __- 123g21 G"API-IC CCKTACLS 1471.54 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00 123421 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS S201.00 FILM I - 123422 . _ . DOK.".GREEN S ASSOCIATES S5.870.00 SURVEYING SBRVJCBS.N.0.6-12791 123423 HB TVPE S CRAPHICS 2266.42 PRINTING a 123424 HANSCLA ENGINEERING $9.679.00 PUMP PARTS r 12342S... __ ..._. HARRIKGICK INDUSTRIAL._PLASTI. .". . _ . 93.204.49 _. . . VA.V8B r 123426 HATCH S KIRK INC $1.016.18 MECHANICAL PARTS O 123427 PL HAWN CO INC $47.41 FILTER N 123428 . .. HILTI INC _. . S610.81 _. - FITTINGS 1234Z9 HCER 8IGER CY3 ASSOC.F INC .897.50 FILTERS 123431 J.1. PORVOIN L SSO 12 570.04 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, J-17 C- 123432 _. ... RE ER CORPORATION RA INC. f5T0.00 _ ._. PAINT BUPPLI88 __ /23g32 HUNTER CORPORATION ge6H65.96 CONSTRUCTIONIJ-19-1 N 123433 HUNTINGTON BEACH DUBBER SIN $68.96 OFFICE BUPPLI88 1233 NURTIKGICA SUPPLY 599.8E HARDWARE 123435 NLNTIA6 TCA YIILFY ECHYIAN C i2.508.99 BICYCLE PARTS 123436 I.G. INDUSTRIAL CORP. $1,298.16 CHBMICALS .. 123437 IMPERIAL WEST CNLMICAL $39.236.43 _ - FORRIC.CNLORIDS 14.0.11-10-90.__, 123438 INDUSTRIAL FILTER PIGS $583.69 FILTERS 123439 INDUSTRIAL TNREACED PRCOLCTS $1,278.00 COMNECTOEe 123440 IRCRAP PIFER $1.851.36 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123441 INLAND VFIRE WHITE, INC $45.567.04 TRUCKS H.O.0-8-92 123442 INTERMOUNTAIN SCIENTIFIC CORP $3.720.74 SAFETY SUPPLIES 123143 INSTPUMENT SPECIALISTS $9.102.50 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 323444 INTERSTATE EATTERY SYSTEFS $2.599.54 BATTERIES --------.— 123445 IRVIRE PINCH PATER CISIPICT $84.66 WATER USE 123996 GREAT LESIERK SANITARY SUPP $3.098.32 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 123947 JAYS CATERING 31.052.30 DIRECEORB' MERTINO DEFENSE - — �' -"'" — 123448 JENSEN TOOLS INC 1TIR.14 TOOLS W W F PC NC 9199 JT GIST YCIXIRG CAPITAL � PROCESSING DATE 7/09/92 PAGE A --- - REPORT NUMBER AP q3 - -- COUNTY CLAI SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORATES COUNTS CLAIMS - - MS PAID Ol/19/92 POSTING DATE Dl/75/92 ' WARRANT NC. VEAOCR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ...__--.. 123449 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $578.60 ELECTRIC PARTS 123450 FAR PRODUCTS f46.47 FITTINGS 123451 THE KEITP COMPANIES $954.90 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-35 6 5-36 123452 RIAG BEARING IRO f2.36R.57 MACHINE SUPPLIES 123413 . .. RRCX IRCIlINIAL SUFPLIES .. S4.020.73 TOOLS _ .. . . .. ..._._ 123454 MARTIA NCRCICN SR $2,941.10 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 123455 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO $426.65 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES ]a 123456 LAD SAFETY SUPPLY CO 395.53 SAFETY SUPPLIES . . - ...._._ _ rn 123457 LAB SUPPORT $4.690.00 TEMPORARY SERVICES Z 123450 LAW CFFICES OF RCBERI L LAVOIE $528.29 LEGAL SERVICES - FLORES V. DALEY C7 123559 LE16AIC SHELVISG I FILE SYS. 560.33 . OFFICE SUPPLIES Y 123460 LIEBLRT CCRPCRAIION $59.88 BATTERIES 123461 HOF AUTOMATION CONTROLS 9296.32 METER 123462. MPS $385.41 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES -_ rn 123463 MACOPCO $372.45 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT - - 3 123464 NAGNETEN RATIONAL ELECTRIC $2.659.64 PUMP REPAIRS .. 123465-- _._ ... MAINIENAICI FROCtCTS -IAC 96.040.94 MECHANICAL PARTS W 123466 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $35.01 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 123467 DON MAURER 92.125.00 OCEAN MONITORING 1 .- 123468 .. MC FADDEN DALE HARDWARE GO $61.87 MACHINE SUPPLIES 123469 HEASVRENE61 CONTROL SYS INC $144.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS ]a 123470 PICRCAGE IF CERRITCS $243.13 OFFICE FURNITURE r 123471 PICWAY RGC I PACNINIAG 52.779.99 PUMP PARTS.. _. r OFFICE SUPPLIES - - - --- -- _----- 123472 MIRNE30TI YES i[RR VISUAL FRCS. f33.55 t0 123173 NISCo $44.84 LAB SUPPLIES -123474 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO 1452.00 _ ELECTRIC PARTS N 123475 RONT60NERV LABORATORIES f1.045.00 LAB SERVICES -- - -- - -- 123476 MCTICR IRCUSTRIES INC 3561.66 HARDWARE 123477 NATICAAL IUCEPY PRESS f66.17 PUBLICATION 123479 NATICRAL SAFETY COUNCIL $69.35 SAFETY FILM RENTAL N 323479 NEV BRUNSYICN SCIENTIFIC $414.10 LAB SUPPLIES 123460 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $633.0% INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 123482 YITT OF REWPCRT BEACH 23.00 WATER U86 192463 NCYA POLEP ILC f21871.00 CONTROFFICE FURNITURE RNEB 1234E3 OFFICE PAVILION/INT[RICR RLS A871.96 OFFICE S 123485 THE OSTEMT CORP 21. 01.49 INSTRUMENT PARTS 123485 ON SYSTEMS MS CO f21r001.q9 CHLORINE N.O.30-9-91 123466 ORANGE CCLNIY CHEMICAL CO f791.51 CIIEMICAL8 123487 CRANES CCLNIY FORM SUPPLY C 11.O14.16 T00LS 1234eB CPANCE VILVE A FIT11N6 CC. $1.146.60 FITTINGS 1234119 CSCAA-S LLCM I SAFC $60.34 KEY CABINET 323490 OXYGEN SERVICE f2.566.56 SPECIALTY OASES 323491 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 66.093.47 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP 123492 PSOCIPOCL SUPPLY OF OCI 344.64 BLEACH 123493 PSSI $1.254.40 T.V. SEWER SERVICES - - - -�- - 123494 PACIFIC FARTS $8.058.37 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS to F FUND NO 9199 JT GIST WCRNIRG CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/99/92 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP93 C[ SANITATIONDISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY .. ....._ .... CLAIMS PAID ID07/07/IS/92 POSTING GATE 07/15/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION .. _ _. 123495 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO $2.179.33 SAFETY SUPPLIES ...123496 PACIFIC FELL 913.34 TELEPHONE SERVICES _ 123497 PAOENET $54.00 PAGER RENTALS 123496 PALMIER19 TYLER. WIENER. $1.534.23 LEGAL SERVICES - OIL WELLS ._113459_ _ ------ ----PARKSON CCRPCRA7ION_ 19.611.R9 PLUMBING SUPPLIEQ 123500 PERMIK-ELDER CORPORATION STS0.92 LAB SUPPLIES 1235C1 PIMA ANO SVSTEPS INC 9112.587.55 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 ]a _.123502._.._'_ . ... PLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE ST6.26 HARDWARE 123503 POLY PURE INC 215.535.09 CATIONIC POLYMER H.0.3-11-92 - f71 I23504 POWER TRACK INC $36.64 PUMP PARTS C, ._ .123505 ---- __ .PRECISICK INCUSTRIES $3.089.79 HARDWARE a 1235C6 HAROLD FFIPPCSE ICE 12RT.00 ICE 123507 THE PROaECI SCLUTIONS CO. 94.720.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91 ,� .. 123508 . .. AQUA-CHEM. INC 5592.13 INSTRUMENT PARTS Frl 123509 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS 2317.53 ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR 3 123530. STEVE P. FADOS. INC. $116,588.00 CONSTRUCTION 30-1-1A-2 .. ..123511.. ...' . . ..RAINECV EISFCSAL CC S1.130.09 TRASH REMOVAL00 123512 RAP SYSTEP TECMNCLOGIES INC $214.42 PUBLICATION 123513 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO.. INC S194.67 LAB SUPPLIES 1 123514 RED WING SHOES $245.67 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES a 123519 REDI EXPRESS $69.30 COURIER SERVICES - - - r. 123516 REMEDY TEPP $710.40 TEMPORARY SERVICES T- 123517 REPOIE PETER RESETTING SVST 55.000.00 POSTAGE METER RENTAL.. _ 123518 MCJURNIA-PEPUELIC SUPPLY $7.636.52 PLUMBING SUPPLIES CO 123519 REMOLD INC. S49.20 MECHANICAL PARTS y . . 123520 J R ROBERTS CORP $76,517.00 CONSTRUCTION J-23-1 .� 123521 RYAN•HERCC $1.073.03 FITTINGS 123522 JCSEPN 7 RYERSCN A SCN IN $3.344.57 METAL _123523 SAFT/RIFE INC 5619.95 ELECTRIC PARTS f"f 123524 SAFELY-KLEEN CORP 5161.50 PARTS CLEANER -4 123525 SAFETY SUPPLY OF AMERICA $209.52 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES N 123526 SANCCN EAGINEERING INC $600.00 MANHOLE REPAIRS DIST 7 123527 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $514.84 FLINGING SUPPLIES 123528 SCIERCE AFPLICA110NS 107•L $87078.06 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-12-91 123529 SC IT SPECIALTY GASES INC $300.99 SPECIALTY GASES 123530 SEA-BIRO ELECTRONICS INC $382.00 LAB SUPPLIES ___ _ 123531 SEA COAST DESIGNS $70.94 OFFICE MACHINE 123512 . SERPENTIN CCKVEYCR CORP $278.99 MECHANICAL PARTS 123513 SF.IMPCCM SUFFLY 11.709.69 TOOLS A HARDWARE 123534 SPASTA ELECTRIC S2.5DO.00 ELECTRICAL INSTALLATIONS - LAB 123535 SHIP A SHORE SHEETMETAL $092.20 ELECTRICAL PARTS 123536 SHIVA CORP $1,709.00 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 123537 SHURELUCM SALES $420.24 HARDWARE 123538 SIGMA CPEPICAL CO $94.16 LAB SUPPLIES 123529 SPITH-EPEFV CC $2.655.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-17-91 123540 SMITH PIPE A SUPPLY INC 112.12 PLUMBING SUPPLIES i 00 Ln CT FL NC 9199 - JT DIST WCRBINO CAPITAL � PROCESSING DATE 7109192 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CCUNIY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY --- -- --- CLAIMS PAID 07/15192 POSTING DATE D7/15/92 WARRANT NO. . VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION -.-. 123541 SCUTFERK CALIF EDISON CO $26.851.94 POWER 123S92 SO CALIF EDISON CO 3105.790.83 POWER .. _. 123543 SO CAL GAS CO $10.223.28 NATURAL GAS 123549 SO CALIF WATER CO $38.67 WATER USE . 123545- ' . . ... SOUTHERN COUNTIES CIL CC 3452.62 DI88RL/UNLBADBD.FURL 123546 SPARPLETTS GRINNING WATER $2.949.39 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTAL' 323547 STANEK 2 SFASSCFF FE $1.400.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.0.3-11-92 n 123548 WESTALLCY INC 31B9.40 WELDING SUPPLIER m 123549 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS INC 1476.85 PLUMBING SUPPLIES C123550 SUMMIT STEEL S555.99 METAL 123511 . . . .SUPELCO .. INC 31.368.7E LAB SUPPLIES a 123552 SUPER CHIP CCRP $379.87 CHEMICALS 1235!3 SLPER FCLER FRCCUCIS $1,034.40 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES i--� 12355E T 3 P. CCRIPACT GLAII6G 3957.00 M I23555 TAYLOR-OUNN MFG COMPANY $1.321.12 EL m ELECTRIC CART PARTS , 3 123556 TAYLOR INDUSTRIAL SOFTWARE 22.910.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 1235E7. _. THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY .. .. $215.11 - MACHINE SUPPLIES 1235!8 TRAFFIC CCN7ACL SERVICE INC $868.47 SAFETY SUPPLIES 00 1235!9 TRAVEL If AVEL $6.664.00 TRAVEL SERVICBS 1 123560 TRUCK 8 AUTC SUPPLY INC $612.82 TRUCK PARTS . a 123561 TUSTIN DODGE 966.79 TRUCK PARTS r 123962 TWINING LABORATORIES OF $5.455.75 LAB SERVICES C- 123563. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $388.56 PARCEL SRRVIC88 123544 UNITED STATES ELEVATOR COPP $543.22 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE C 1236E! VLR SCIEAIIFIC $2.948.81 LAB SUPPLIES N 123566 VALIN CCRPORATION 3569.2E REGULATOR PARTS --j 123567 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO $2,766.46 PLUMBING SUPPLIES A 123568 VAN WATER 8 ROGERS 31.286.75 CHEMICALS 12356E VANIER BOSINCSS FORMS 32.92E.77 PRINTING - _.._. -------_.._- --1 123570 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUFENTS 52.106.78 LAD SUPPLIES Cn 1235)) yERTEF SISTEFS 912.147:25 OFFICE EQUIPMENT/COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 123512 VILLIEE NURSERIES 121E4 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 323573 VOLLER, SAVAGE 9 ASSOC $E39.25 INSURANCE 0 RISK MANAGENEHT CONSOLVING_ 12357E WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $33,360.75 CAUSTIC SODA 14.0.8-0-90 123975 WESTIN ENGINEERING S10.967.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES____,___ 123576 WESTRUK INTERNATIONAL 1413.53 TRUCK PARTS 123577 VCRTFINETIN FCRD $86.452.17 TRUCKS M.O.E-0-92 123578 XEROX CCOP 39.535.1E COPIER LEASES 123579 SIEBARTN AND ALPER $66.007.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-34-1 - ----------------- TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 07/15/92 $3.914.161.31 -- -- - CT D� 1 V FUND NO - 9199 -- - JT DIBR WORKING CAPITAL - PROCESSING DATE 07/09/92 PAGE REPO -} -- ------ RBPORT NUMBER AP4313 COUNTY SANITATION 07 15/92DISTRICTSPOSTING OF ORATES COUNTY - -- -- - --- --- CLAIN9 PAID 07/IS/92 POSTING DATE 07/15/92 SUMMARY AMOUNT it OPEN FUND _ . .-_-___ _..__ _._. _. _ $142.28 41 CAP FAC FOND $117,140.50 42 OPEN FORD $15,166.60 82 CAP FAC FUND $573.37 a 43 OPEN FUND $17,123.89 'n 45 OPEN FUND $14,897.79 Z 85 CAP PAC FUND._... _.._.__ _ _._ _.._____._._. _ - $2,714.38 C7 46 OPEN FUND $99.65 47 OPEN FOND $3,859.83 ... 47 CAP FAC FUND - $593.98 -{ 411 OPEN FUND $8,159.00 m 013 OPEN FUND $24.19 3 414 OPEN POND_. .. _ . ._ . . _ _. $58.19 414 CAP PAC FUND $9,911.26 00 4586 OPEN FUND i1,917.20 47614 OPEN FUND .. - .- $12.08. 1 JT OPBR FORD $754,027.41 Y CORF , . $2,737,571.94 r 98LP FUNDED IN9VRANC6 FUNDS _ -$57,420.76 -- -- --------------------- 1- JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND _i172=757_07__ t7 _ _ . . _. _. . i3,914,161.37 - .. . . .._. ..__.. .__._.. --4 70 .r n --I F�UD NC 9199 JT DIST AIPXTRG CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/23/92 PAGE I REPORT NUMBER AP43 ------ - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY - -- - - - - - -- CLAIMS PAID 07/29/92 POSTING DATE 07/29/92 NARRANL NC. VEh00R AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 123601 AS TECH CCHPANY 36b.58B.85 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.30-9-91 . ' 123692 ASH ANALYSIS 1880.00 ENGINE OIL ANALYSIS - 123603 A T L T S39246.20 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 123604 APERIUh IELEPHGRE h TELEGRAPH $1.504.01 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 1236C0 A T 1 T $513.69 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES-- - - 1236b6 ACCU-LABS RESEARCH INC $50.60 LAB SERVICES 123607 ACTION RENTALS $1,795.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 123808 ADVANCED CCOLING TECHNOLOGIES 8951.41 ELECTRIC PARTS - fTl 123609 AIR PHCTI SERVICES 9280.16 AERIAL PHOTOS Z 123610 AIR FAICLCiS h CHEMICAL 1R $16.015.90 OSN AGREEMENT GET. GEN SYST M.O.8-9-89 t , 123611 ALPHAGAZ $882.56 SPECIALTY GASES Y 123612 AMERICAN DISTRICT TELEGRAPH $15.00 SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS 123613 AMERICAN MEDIA INC $48.95 VNB TAPE PREVIEWS 123614 NOBCO IhC SACE APERICAN SEALS 5727.31 PUMP PARTS _.- - T77 123(15 APERIUR TYPE CULTURE COLLECTS 5508.25 LAB SUPPLIES 3 123616 CMARLES E. ANDERSON 5275.00 MACHINE REPAIRS ZME 123617 ANGEL SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $1.036.59 LAB SUPPLIES 00 123618 ANIXIER • OISTRIBDTI[h $502.04 COMPUTER PARTS 123619 A•PLUS STSTEPS $3.342.66 NOTICES 6 ADS 1 123620 ABC LASCRATCRIES $2,165.00 LAB SERVICES .. .. .. .. . . .. ._ _ D 123621 AQUATIC TESTING LABORATORY 5500.00 LAB SERVICES r 123622 ARATEX SERVICES INC $4.286.57 UNIFORM RENTALS r 123623 ARIZCNA INSTRUMENT $492.99 INSTRUMENT. PARTS 123624 ART LORRE $106.03 AWARDS FRAMING C 123f25 ASSCIIAIEE DIESEL $672.60 ENGINE PARTS y 123626 ASSOC. AOFINIS. C COR3ULTAhTS 5270.00 MEDICAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION-_ -,_,__. 123627 BMM LANDFILL 920.524.13 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.30-9-91 123628 SPY SAFETY 9 SUPPLY 558.19 SAFETY SUPPLIES 123629 8 BATEPAR $600.00 BEVERAGE) COMP DIBTBIEDTIQN___.-.. 1236-0 BATTERY SPECIALTIES 1260.47 BATTERIES N 123631 BAXTER CIA6ROSTICS IRC $1.707.92 LAB SUPPLIES 123632. SAVLESS STATIONERS $54.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123633 J t H BERGE INC $218.87 LAB SUPPLIES 123634 BOYLE ENEINEERIRG CORP $33.269.69 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-30 -.123635 .. BREBhER•FIEDLER E ASSOC Ih $1.836.59 . COMPRESSOR 12363E BLP.GET JAPITCPIAL $137.56 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 123637 BUILDEROS EMPORIUM $66.42 HARDWARE/LUMBER 123638 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES INC 51.772.00 SURVEY SERVICES M.O.6-12-91- 123639 GARYBUTLER G .TREED $4.64fi.84 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT - - _ -- -- -- 123690 BUTLfP PERCH CO PCT .180.37 OFFICE BUPPLIE9 1236R1 SLEW IT .I ILTI[h3. INCI $4.466.62 SERVALVES A6R68MENT-_-._ 1236g2 CS CCMPA RY fHIST.62 VALVES 125643 CAHL ET ON ENGINEERS 3187.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-20, 9-90 . 123644 45 JCHN CARk C TERIN EERS i129.586.06 ENGINEERING 86RVIC83 J-201 P2-93, P1-30 _ 123646 CHAR TES L CARTER CO SI88.61 TRUCK PARTS 123Egf D1CN CFPEM IRC t166.10 TRUCK PARTS n PJ FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST YORMINC CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/23192 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP03 . . CCIINTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF CRANOC COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/29/92 POSTING DATE 07/29/92 WARRANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ..._. _".. 123607 ChEVRCN LSA INC $3.303.90 OIL 0 GREASE 123648 CCASIAL Ch LCRIKATICK 53.92D.00 WATER SYST. CHLORINATION _ 123649 CCLICh ARC SCNS $2.275.075.00 CONSTRUCTION I-9 /23650 COMPUSA. INC. 55.085.7U COMPUTER HARDWARB/SOFTWARE 123651 .. COMPUSERVE $26.27 COMPUTER SERVICES 123652 CONNELL EM PARTS / DIV S41.70 TRUCK PARTS 123653 CONSCLICAIEC ELECTRICAL LIST $8.248.22 ELECTRIC PARTS a 123651 CCNTAINERIZED CHEMICAL DISPO 96.294.75 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL n' 1236SS CDNTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC $331.02 TOOLS Z 12365E CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO 91,616.25 CHLORINE M.O.9-9-91 t7 123667 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS 5590.13 PRINTING _ n 123658 CCCPER 16CUSIRIES INC 61.099.71 COMPRESSOR PARTS - 123659 CCCREINAIEC ECLIF CC INC $375.00 MACHINE PARTS 123660 COSTA VISA AUTO SUPFLY S1.u20.38 TRUCK PARTS f�l 123661 R E COULTER CRANE PE NTAL 1666.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 3 123662 COUNCIL OF 910L06V EDITORS $60.90 PUBLICATIONS 123663 STATE IF CALIFCRNIA 1876.55 PROCUREMENT FEES -.VBHICLEB 00 12366E STATE IF CALIFCPNIA 5157.50 HAZARDOUS WASTE TAX 1236E5 RIRIE IF CALIFCRRIA 9321.24 DIESEL USE FEES 1 123666 GAMES S FCCRE 529.175.92 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-30-3 p 123667 PETER C DAVID CO 1167.303.50 CONSTRUCTION 3-26-2 r 123668 DE ANIA CORPORATION $150.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 1- 123669 HSN/OECMEP 5319.97 INSTRUMENT PARTS 123670 DEZURIN ARO/CR CS CO 52021.51 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 123611 DIGITAL IGUIPMIhi CORP $9,588.68 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1 _ 123672 DORADO ENILRFPISLS .INC .. $100.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS 123673 ROBERT F DRIVER ASSOC $645.169.00 PROPERTY INSURANCE M.0.1-8-92 ;0 123674 OUNN E0IAPDS COOP 97.322.99 PAINT SUPPLIES f"1 , ..123675.. .. _ . EASIKAN INC _ _ $5.113.72 _ OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 123676 ECOAhALVSIS 1hC $4.090.34 OCEAN MONITORING R.-Cl -17-91 Cn 123677 ELECTRO-IL'ST INC 53.258.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS _. 12367E -. ELECTRO NUMERICS INC $164.09 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 123679 ENCHANTER INC 67.200.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.6.7-111-91 - -- -""-" 123680 FIT $260.92 INSTRUMENT PARTS . 123681-...._. . ENVIRCNKERIAL RICO. USA $9.686.73 TRUCK PARTS 123662 ERVIPCNPE91AL RESOURCE ASSCC S646.50 LAB SERVICES 123683 MARSHALL III BPI 1178.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 123684 . . ... FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 117.041.22 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 1236N5 JOHN B FALKENSTEIN FE 53.100.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9, 1-16 --' - -- 123686 FAX PRESS $54.51 OFFICES SUPPLIES 123607.. FEDEPAL EXPRESS CORF $336.75 AIR FREIGHT 123688 CHERNESI INC $749.90 SCRUBBER PARTS 123669 FISCHER 6 PORTER CO 53.233.10 CHLORINATION PARTS _. 123690 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO 5370.4R LAB SUPPLIES 123691 FLO-SYSTEFS 14.818.73 PUMP PARTS 123692 FCABES CCPPUTER GROUP INC $80.00 FREIGHT 2 f7 1 ...-_ W fUN NO 9199 - Ji OISi WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/23/92 PAGE ! R CRORY NUMBER AP43 _ -- - - - - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/29/92 POSTING DATE 07/29/92 WARRANT N0. _ VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 123693 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CiHERA $50.09 FILM 123694 FCUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $851.55 PAINT SUPPLI88 ._. ._.__ .. 123695 FIX ENIEPPRISES 91.025.00 SAFETY CONSULTANT 123696 FOX INDUSTRIAL SALES 636.85 ELECTRIC PARTS 123697 FRANCE COMPRESSOR PRODUCT $13.716.57 COMPRESSOR PARTS 123696 BUD FRCY $71.16 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION D 123699 GANAPL LLFBEP CO 11,634.59 HARDWARE 123760 GAZES FIEERGLASS INSTALLERS 97.500.00 FIBERGLASS REPAIRS Zn' 127712 GENERAL CCEANICS. INC. 9283.37 LAB SUPPLIES 123102 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO $4.233.98 TELEPHONE SERVICES n 123703 VITALY GORODETSKY $131.72 DETERRED COMP PAY/OFF_. 123704 GOVERNMENT IRSTIIUTFS INC S69.00 PUBLICATIONS 123709 GRANOM 6 .PPES 61.767.42 LEGAL SERVICEO M.O.0-14.91 ---I 1237EG CRAPFIC CISTRIBUICRS $1.146.46 FILM 3 123707 DCN GREEN 6 ASSOCIATES S19.635.00 SURVEY SERVICES N.O.6-12-91 I23108 "SO TECHNOLOGY 6518.400.00 CONSTRUCTION J-23-2 6 P2-44 123709_.. . NO .TYPE G GRAPHICS . .... .. . . ..._. . . . $71.12 . _ _.__ PRINTING 0000 123730 HACH CONFANT $2.767.26 SAFETY SUPPLIES 123711 FRED A PAMPER 21.500.04 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 1 123712 NARRIAGICA INDUSTRIAL PLASH . S497.38 .. _ PLUMBING.SUPPLIED, a 123714 MATCH A MIRK INC f18.860.69 THROB PARTS r 123715 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $4 S491.95 TMHH REMOVAL T- 123716 _ Pt HAWNNAYN . CO .INC .. . . $2S1.09 _. .. . ._.. COMMUNr"TaftE .._ C 123717 HELLO .290.52 LAD EQUIPMENT eUUIPMBNT 127717 HEYLETY iACN1R0 CO $]39673.99 ELL TRIC PART 4 ._123719 WEFT ICI _ ... .. . . . ...... .. f671.95 L ELECTRIC PARTS, ..-.-,_.--_________ 1 123719 HOCFCR SCIENTIFIC IIF INC $1.874.68 LAB COMPRESSOR 123720 HOER BIGEM CYS IOR.. I 61.874.6E CONPR88800. PARTS n --123721----:- --._.RC.....N OFEBATH IND/OR.. ISCO ....... .... . .. _ f$3.000.03. _-._ ..- _. . ..- .CONPLBRSTRU , __ � 123722 J.Y. NORVIIM S ASSOC. fJ.000.00 CONSTRUCTION BHRVIC68 J- - . — fn 123723 AS ER6NC1 CD INC S655.96 PAINT SUPPLIES 8 .123729_ .. HUNTER TON OR BEACH ._ i309 237.20 _ ,CONSTRUCTION J-19-1 ._-_.-_,-„_,._.___ 12372E HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STA $367.03 OFFICE SUPPLI88 123726 HURLEY_T ELECTRONICS- L VALLEY SCHYINN C SS23.S] BICYCLE PARTS --123721____._- _.. HURLEY_T-. EIEC iP ONIC3_ INC. .. ...._ _ .. . $50.00 .._._. _. - __....PUBLICATICD, DUPPLIEB 123729 I C i INC 714.47 PUBLICATION 123729 I.S. INDUSTRIAL CCPP. f2 9fil.47 INSTRUMENT CHLORIDE M.0.9-9-93 .-..123730_. ... .... . AMC INDUSTRIES _.. . .. .. $169.80 .. .__ INSTRUMENT PUPPLI68 123732 ISCG INC f169.B3 INSTRUMENT CHL PARTS 123732 IMPERIAL 6C51 CHEMICAL f1l•459.91 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-14-90 _123733.__..:. . . : . IAGBAB PAPER _ 1083.9E - - . ..._.- . _ OFFICE BUPPLIEB 123735 INLAND EFFIRE IENTIFIC CC. 3$5,281.91 TRUCK M.O.A-30-22 123735 INSTR ME NT SPECIALISTS SCIENTIFIC C[RP $3,032.50 LAB INSTRUMENT SERVICES . __123737_._ _ .. INSTRUMENT TIONS ALI Sii SD.032.60 INBTRUMBMT 88RVIC88 123730 INTERCONNECTIONS i2 d60.00 COMPUTER DOYTUARB - 123730 IBM CORP[RA LION f348.00 SERVICE AGRBHNBNT f'0 W t FUND NO 9199 - JT DISI WCRKIKG CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/23/92 FARE A -REPORT NUMBER AP43 _.. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 97/29/92 POSTING DATE 07/29/92 WARRANT NO. _ VEROOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION - 123739 PACTEL TELETRAC 535.DO TELEPHONE SERVICES 123740 JLA CREDIT CORP 5145.32 MICROFICHE READER LEASE 123741 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP $783.01 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 123742 J/V-S SLSFERSICK SERVICE $50.00 TRUCK PARTS 123143. JCHNSCN PCVER OF NO.AMERICA .. $388.85 MECHANICAL FARTS 123744 JORDAN CONTROLS INC 3247.73 INSTRUMENT PARTS 123745 MINK REAPING INC $262.78 MACHINE SUPPLIES a 123746 KhCO IKOLS7RIAL SUPPLIES $1.625.71 TOOLS _ 'm 123741 PAPTIR PEPDICK IN $2.999.20 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 - - ---- Z 12379E LAB SUPPORT 13.149.25 LAB SERVICES C7 123H9 .LAY OFFICES OF ROBERT L LAVOIE S50.00 .. LEGAL.SERVICES = FLARES— 123750 LEG1-TECH 5275.00 - COURIER SERVICES 123711 - KP LINDSTROM INC $6.518.80 CONBULTING SERVICE - NPDES 123752 LCRAIN PRODUCTS $1.251.30 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT - RELIANCE, POWER m 123753 MPS $8.62 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 3 123754 MAINFRAPE SERVICE INC $3.622.00 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 123755 MANLEY-S BOILER REPAIR CO. INC _- t1.616.35 _. ._ VALVE,_ OO 12375E MARTEN a1.599.99 GROUINDSKERPING SUPPLIES 123757 MATT CHLOR INC $3.233.67 CHLORINATION PARTS 1 123165 BCBAIR INSTRUEEN TS 21.564.00 . . IERVICEENT AG .. . .... ..... ... __ .___ y 123760 PCGARRY CEM1PAL INCFEYR I7EP I $5.257.06 SERVICE AGREEMENTS 123761 - NERILL UICH C N 55.257.00 COMPUTER REMARKETING AGREE r 123761 . MERRILL LYNCH CAPITAL MARKETS ._ s$1.243.43 ..- _ _._ COMPUTER SO TWARENENT____ — 123763 MICROAGE COMPUTER 51.2Al.A! COMPUTER SOFTWARE 123764 MIDWAY RFG 6 MACHINING f3.191.11 MACHINE LIESREPAIRS N . . 123765 . MILLIPORC AhC/OR YA7 ERS - S937.15 _ _ . ._ INSTRUMENT � 1237f5 MTLL TROMICS 52A0.71 INSTRUMENT PASTS --- - ------- A 123766. MINNESOTA VESTERN VISUAL PASS. $617.05 OFFICE MACHINE f"f -123767- __._MITCHELL PACIFIC CONSTRUCTORS $65.610.00 .. ._ .. _ ..CONSTRUCTION_7-11-2 123768 M071CK IKOUSIRIES INC $23.21 HARDWARE N 123769 MCTORCLA INC $132.50 COMPUTRR SOFTWARE . 123770 ._ NAIIChAL LAIER RESEARCH - 1150.000.00 - _._.. _ -. ANNUAL CONTRIBUTION M.6.7-17-91 123771 NEW BRUMSVICK SCIENTIFIC 5123.2E LAB SUPPLIES --- ---- --- - --- 123772 NEWARK ELECTRONICS a24S.95 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES NORCAL ...CONTROLS INC .. $1.170.17 _ ....... __.._.. _MECHANICAL PARTS 123774 01 COPPOPATIOR 195.25 LAB BUPPLI68 _ 12377S OCCUPATICKAL VISION SERVICES 5925.0E REIMBURSABLE SAFETY GLASSES _. 12371f . - _ CFFICE PAVILICN/INIERICP ALI $793.01 .. OFFICE FURNITURE 123777 UK SYSTEPS CC 914.513.17 CHLORINE N.O.ID-9-91 - - ---_-- 123778 ON-LINE ELECTRONICS $105.06 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES ORANGE VALVE 6 FITTING CO. $1.822.40 . . FITTINGS 123780 OXYGEN SERVICE $469.58 SPECIALTY OA8B0 ----- 12370/ CCINIV SAK17ATICK CISTRICT 5658.7E DEFERRED ODMP DISTRIBUTION 123782 _ CSDCC SELF-FUNDED MEDICAL I $100.000.00 PREMIUM ADVANCE 123Th3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT a14.393.45 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE'" - -" 123794 PACIFIC PARTS t212.61 INSTRUMENT PARTS C'7 r a I F(.. NO 9199 JT DIST NCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/23/92 PAGE 5� REPORT NUMBER AP43 ---- --- -. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY -- ' CLAIMS PAID 07/29/92 POSTING GATE 07/29/92 WARRANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 123785 PACO PUMPS $664.43 PUMP PARTS 123186 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO S29F072.22 SAFETY SUPPLIES 123787 PACIFIC EELL 2614.16 TELEPHONE SERVICES 12S788 PACIFIC VIER CCNDITICRING C 268.4D RENTAL EQUIPMENT 123789 PACTEL FERIDIAN SYSTEMS 255.97 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS . 123790 PAM WEST $41.57 JANITORIAL SERVICES 123791 PARTS UNLIMITED 91,433.99 TRUCK PARTS ]a 123792 ROW PENDEPGRAFT - 1460.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION m 123193 PEPKIK•ELFER CORPORITIOR $684.74 LAB SUPPLIES Z12J794 PHCT[ 1 £DLRC CO 248.42 OFFICE FURNITURE = 12 J 7955 F10NEER BIAN s72.779.10 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 5t=l -34-7. Oa 123796 PITNEY BOWES S452.02 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 123797 POLYPURE INC S13.500.26 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.7-17-91 .� PACKING MATERIALS 12379E PCRTEP BCILEP SERVICE INC .911.98 - :3 1238CO PCST EDELEFEP PR OLUCTS f8$901.39 PRINTING 3 123801 POWER SYSTEMS fLPPLY CC f914.56 GENCTRICERATOR SUPPLIES 123801 POWER SYSTEMS f914.56 GENERATOR �tk00 I23B 02 PRECISION INDUSTRIES 219163.46 FITTINGS 123603 PREMIER PRINTING CORP. f5.471.55 PRINTING 1 123804 HAROLC PRIMROSE ICE $259.00 ICE 123805 - PRCFE£SICS AL SERVICE IND. $1,314.00 SOILS TESTING n 123866 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. $4.720.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91 123807 PULSAFCEDER 2500.73 PUMP PARTS 123888 AQUA-CHEM. INC SZ.341.90 INSTRUMENT PARTS O 123809 QUALITY BLILDING SLPFLY $03.72 BUILDING MATERIALS ^" 123810 PPP ELECTRIC NCTORS f1.666.48 ELECTRIC PUMP REPAIR N 123011 STCYC P. R/DOS. INC. 3588.268.80 CONSTRUCTION 14-1-IA-2 123 2 INC f52. RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.3-13-91 B1 RECYC -..12]813 RED . WINS SHOES f2072.7E 27.57 REIMBURSABLE SAFSTY BM093, n 123814 SIDE $743.31 MAP INDEXES --- 4 123815 REDI EXPRESS $56.70 COURIER SERVICES Co . ..123,81E REISP MARIKE EILCIES. IRC t1.060.00 OCEAN MONITORING /23817 HCJUKXIA-REPUBLIC SUPPLY SB.009.32 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 123818 PEGGY RUPP $540.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION _.123819...... . . JCSEPH T RYERSON 8 SON IN 3349.68 METAL 123120 SAFT/h IFE IKC $282.83 ELECTRIC PARTS 123621 SAFETY-KLIEN CCRF 286.70 PARTS CLEANSE --123822__ . SANTA FE IRDUSTRIAL PLASTICS f2.046.1t PLUMBING SUPPLIES 123823 RICHARD E. SCHLEGEL $3,000.00 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 123824 SEA COAST DESIGKS 3109.90 OFFICE EQUIPMENT _123825.___. _. . SERPEhTIK CCKVEVCR CORP $2.064.04 MECHANICAL PARTS 123E2C SFAMFCCK SCIER7IFIC SPEC SYS $412.32 LAB SUPPLIES 123827 ShAMRCCK SUPPLY f1.W57.24 TOOLS 12382E SHASIA ELECTRIC S9.000.00 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 123829 SHURELUCK SALES $7.466.21 PAINT SUPPLIES 123830 SIGMA CHEFICAL CO 2361.41 PUBLICATIONS t7 LJl FUND NO 9199 - JT DI ST Y[Mct NG CAPITAL PROCESSING GATE 7/23/92 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 _. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE . . ..._ _. .. _.. ___.—._ CLAIMS PAID O7129192 POSTING DATE 07129197/29/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION _ 123831 SILVERI L LE BOUEF 5655.011.90 CONSTRUCTION 5-34-3 123932 SMITH-EXERT CO S1.610.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-17-91 123833 EC CCAST AIR QUALITY $2.375.00 PERMIT FEES 123834 SCLTH CCITT WATER s8T•50 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 123835 SCUTEERA CALIF EDISON CO $202.331.03 POWER ._ 123836 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO $10.579.33 - DIESBL/UNLEADED FUEL 123837 SOUVENIR PHOTO $113.16 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES n 123838 VESTALLOT, INC $338.13 WELDING SUPPLIES m 123839 SPECIAL FLASTIC SYSTEMS IAC f64.65 PLUMBING SUPPLIES m 123840 SFEM INCL£TPIES INC $527.35 LAB SUPPLIES C 123811 SRECC FLEXIBLE 52.662.64 TRUCK PARTS a 123842 STATE STREET BANK $5.325.00 C.O.P. ADMIX FEES 123943 STERLING ART 147.76 OFFICE SUPPLIES �-+ 123844 SUBURBAN FCRD 540.691.65 TRUCKS I3) M.O.4-8-92 _ m123845 SUPMIT STEEL $276.50 METAL - -- - -- --� 3 12384E SLASET F(RO $310.08 TRUCK PARTS 123847 SUPER CHIP CORP .. 92.805.17 _ _ JANITORIAL SUPPLIES_ qk 123849 SUP-LITE CORPORATION $21,017.68 WASTE DIGESTER FLARES 00 123849 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG COMPANY $1.212.51 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 1 ... 121850 TEKMAR . CCPPART _. $830.36 .. LAB.SQPPLIES..__. _.. . ._. _._....._-_____.... 123851 - THE TENVIPE COMPANY 195.12 VALVE 0a 1230E2 CHARLES E TPCMAS 51.373.80 BUILDING REPAIRS F- _123853 _.... THCOPSOR 1ROUSTRIAL SUPPLY_ . . $857.2G _ ._ .._....__ HARDWARP• ___.___.-_ r 123854 TILE MATTERS $119.72 BUILDING MATERIALS ty 123855 TOYO LANDSCAPING CO $7.906.74 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.11-13-91 .. ._1238'.6 . TRAVEL TRAVEL ._._ .. .. $2.320.00 .. TRAVEL SERVICES CA 123857 TRUCK I AUTC SUPPLY INC f164.79 TRUCK PARTS '-I 123E5B. JG IUCKEF I SCR INC $925.14 INSTRUMENT PARTS -.123859___ . __. .. DALIEL TUNRICLIFF .._ _ $07.01 _. ._. DEFERRED COMP_PAY OFF C7 323861 US5T IN DODGE $226.61 RENTAL PARTS --L--- -- 123661 US RENTALS $1,211.40 RENTAL EQUIPMENT N 1238E2.__ . .ULTRA ANEIEM3 $7,290.00 _ ENGINEERING 58RVICES _ 123863 UNIOR BANK ST.290.00 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 7=13=7--- 123864 UKOCAL $87.23 UNLEADED GASOLINE I23E65____ . -__ UKITEIL _CCKCRETE COPPANIES. _ _.f376.91 __ .......__. .______.CONCRETE_ _ 123866 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $164.20 PARCEL SERVICES __ 123867 UNITED TAPE CORPORATION 363.19 PUBLICATION __ YG/FISIGNF INSTRUMENTS. . . . $12,000.00 .__ .. .. LAB.EQUIPMENT 123069 VVR SCIENTIFIC $3.147.40 LAB SUPPLIES ' - - ---------- 123870 VALLEY CITIES SLPPLY CC 57.322.32 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 123871- _ . VANIER BUSINESS FORMS . $2.200.62 . .. _ . . . . ..PRINTING 123872 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $1.688.96 1" SUPPLIES -- 223873 VERNE-S PLUMBING $35.00 PLUMBING SERVICES _121874 . . VERTEX SVSTEPS $1.397.50 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 123875 VILLAGE NURSERIES 991.36 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES - -------' 123E76 VCRTE■ IACCEIRIES $270.00 DOOR REPAIRS C7 _ _ 14 FUND NO 9194 . JT DIST WINNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/23/92 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBED AP43 CC SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS CLAIMS PAID 07129/92 POSTING DATE 07/29/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 123977 BIG LARE PHOTOGRAPHY $175.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES 123878 CARL VARFEA 4 CO $300.00 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADNINI STRATOR 123879 WATER ERVIRONPENT FED. $1.225.06 TRAINING REGISTRATION 123880 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRDOUCTS IN $255.19 SAFETY SUPPLIES 223881 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY f17.526.69 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-0-90 . 123982 WHATFAN LAB SALES INC $769.50 LAB SUPPLIES 123863 WILLIAMS L VILLAINS $36.27 LAB SUPPLIES a 1238e4 RCLRME A bCCCRLFF L CR $79.702.90 LEGAL SERVICES N.0.2-19-92 m 123885 GECROE YARDLEY CC $59.64 VALVE Z 12l886 YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEMS $232.56 FREIGHT C 123087 RICHARD YOUNG PROD $2.422.63 PRINTING, EUPMES„ .. . ..._ ._._---._-.._-_.__ y 123868 CARL ZEISS INC $15.314.65 LAB EQUIPMENT 123SES 21EDARTP F ALPER/C.S. ALFER $32.754.00 CONSTRUCTION P2-42-1 1238SO RICHARD E ECCAR f200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION m ---------------_ 3 - - TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 07/29/92 $6.843.037.40 DO a SUMMARY AMOUNT - r ..- ----------- r Rl oPea FUND ... .. ._ -.. .. . - ._._ . .. .. . .... ....... $4,131.74 C7 RI CAP FAC FUND $89,493.23 ,—� 82 OPER F G $33 UND 11,72821 02 P PAC FUND $42, .62 � R3 OPER FUND =42,076283.076.7474 C+ --03 .GR.FAC.FUND.----- _. .... ... _ ___ ... .__... _. 81$7,901.50... .... 23 87,643.32 N RE CAP PAC FUND j7$2,060.65 .- -#7 OPER FUND_ .. - _ $5,535.57 R7 OPER FUND 74,552.62 07 GP FAC FUND 8$2,657.92 --R11.OPER FUND .. .. _- 82104.72 R14 OPER FUND $615.99 B19 OPER FUND .554.07 .. 014.GP FAC FUND j503,505.07 B5B6 OPER FUND j3,$32.49 8667 OPER LAND 578.48 - - 8751E OPER FU FDND 40, 18.71 JT E FUND $3,566,669.69 CORE 53,162,216.51 .. ..88LF FUNDED INSURANCE FUN09 $135,372.08 JT IIORkINC CAPITAL 8135,371.OB ___________________ ..._ _ $6,843,037.40 V COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS A ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 1054O ELUS AVENUE A 0.SOY 0127 FOUNTAIN V4 EY,CALIFORNIA S271Ne.91'!- P1a882.'Nn August 4, 1992 MEMORANDUM To: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager From: Katherine Yarosh, Senior Buyer Subject: Purchase of Traffic Control Devices, Sign Holders, Signs and Accessories, Specification No. E-216 Sealed bids were opened Tuesday, May 12, 1992, for the Purchase of Traffic Control Devices, Sign. Holders, Signs and Accessories, Specification No. E-216. Tabulation of bids is as follows: Vendo Price J.G. Tucker and Son, Inc. (Sole responsive Bidder) $43,689.24 Pacific Safety 2,698.00* Century Safety No Bid* _. IF Does not meet bid specifications and therefore must be rejected. Pacific Safety bid on only a portion of the total items and thus, was non-responsive. Century Safety submitted a "no-bid". Staff recommends award to J.G. Tucker and Son, Inc., the sole responsive bidder, for a total cost of$43,689.24, plus sales tax. Respectfully submitted, k aS�TCJu rr y OJ)d-I- ) Katherine Yarosh Senior Buyer We hereby concur with the foregoing recommendation: I I(�7 % lY + Edwin E. Hodges J Nicholas 1 Arhontes Assistant Director of Maintenance Staff Engineer, Maintenance KY:cm "D" AGENDA ITEM #9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS ID" �..✓ RESOLUTION NO. 92-104 CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF FIBER OPTIC NETWORK BETWEEN NEW LABORATORY AND MAINTENANCE OPERA IONS CONTROL CENTER, SPECIFICATION NO. M-040 ./ A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF FIBER OPTIC NETWORK BETWEEN NEW LABORATORY AND MAINTENANCE/OPERATIONS CONTROL CENTER, SPECIFICATION NO. M-040, TO SIM J. HARRIS COMPANY The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Purchasing Manager that award of contract be made to Sim J. Harris Company for Purchase and Installation of Fiber Optic Network between New Laboratory and Maintenance/Operations Control Center, Specification No. M-040, and the bid tabulation and recommendation, and �✓ proposals submitted for said specification are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That said contract for Purchase and Installation of Fiber Optic Network between New Laboratory and Maintenance/Operations Control Center, Specification No. M-040, be awarded to Sim J. Harris Company for a total amount not to exceed $59,223.00, in accordance with the terms and conditions of said specification and the bid proposals therefor; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said contract, in form approved by the General Counsel ; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said specification are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 12, 1992 "E-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-1" July 14, 1992 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS AI ORANGE COUM. CALIFORNIA MEMORANDUM 10W EWS AVENUE PO.6ONB1V FpMrNN VALLEY.CA lmO eeT3 v TO: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager nlneeesAll ` 1 FROM: Katherine Yarosh, Senior Buyer SUBJECT: Purchase and Installation of Fiber Optic Network Between New Laboratory and Maintenance/Operations Control Center, Specification No. M-040 Sealed bids were opened Tuesday,July 14, 1992,for the Purchase and Installation of Fiber Optic Network Between New Laboratory and Maintenance/Operations Control Center. Tabulation of bids Is as follows: VENDOR PRICE Sim J. Harris Company $59223.00 San Diego, CA Digital Equipment Corp. $67,793.61 Costa Mesa, CA Digital Networks Corp. $70,984.00 El Toro, CA Snowden Electric Company $73,425.00 Cerritos, CA BC! Communications $851898.00 San Diego, CA Bid proposals were received from five vendors. Staff recommends award to Sim J. Harris Company, San Diego, the lowest responsible bidder,for a total cost of$59.223.00, which Includes labor, material and all applicable sales tax. Respectfully submitted, Katherine Yarosh Senior B r Ted Hoffman Purchasing Manager We hereby concur with the foregoing recommendations: , g 54 (01, Steve Hovey ed el Gary G. it 1...� Information Services Manager Director Inane "E-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-2" RESOLUTION NO. 92-105 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF ANIONIC POLYEL TROLY HEMICAL POLYMER 5 CATION NO. P-1 2 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF ANIONIC POLYELECTROLYTE CHEMICAL POLYMER, SPECIFICATION NO. P-132, TO DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL • f f f f # # # # # Y # f f f # f # The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Purchasing Manager that award of contract be made to Diatec Environmental for Purchase of Anionic Polyelectrolyte Chemical Polymer, Specification No. P-132, and the bid tabulation and recommendation, and proposal submitted for said specification are hereby received and ordered filed; and, \� Section 2. That a Purchase Contract for Specification No. P-132 be awarded to Diatec Environmental for the price of $0.039 per pound plus sales tax, furnished and delivered in accordance with the terms and conditions of said specification and the bid proposal therefor, for a one-year period beginning September 1, 1992, with provision for four one-year extensions upon mutually-agreeable terms; and, Section 3.- That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3. 5. 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign said Purchase Contract with said supplier to supply anionic polyelectrolyte chemical polymer pursuant to the specifications and purchase contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel ; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said material are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 12, 1992. "F-1# AGENDA ITEM #9(C) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA July 14, 1992 1C EWB AVENUE Pa e0M al" FQUWWN VPLLEY.fA4IOPNIA P39 81a' MEMORANDUM nulem.mll To: Wayne Sylvester, General Manager From: Katherine Yarosh, Senior Buyer Re: Purchase of Anionic Polyelecbolyte Chemical Polymer, Specification No. P-132 Sealed bids were opened Tuesday, June 30, 1992, for the purchase and delivery of Anionic Polyelectrolyte Chemical Polymer for a one-year period beginning September 1, 1992. Tabulation of bids is as follows: Product Estimated S',yg{ Estimated Vendor No. Otv. (Ills) Per III, Annual Coat 1. Dlatec Diatec 5,031,233 $0.039 $196,218.08 Environmental OC-20A Illinois 2. Neutron PhotaRoc 6,145,288 0.038 233,520.94 Products, Inc. 1123-S Maryland 3. Callaway Jayfioc 424.509 0.725 307.769.00 Chemical Company 806 Div. of Exxon Chemical Company Georgia It Is recommended the award be made to Dlatec Environmental, the lowest resposnibie bidder, for a one-year contract period starting September 1, 1992. The total estimated annual cost of $196.218.08. plus sales tax. Is based on furnishing 5,031,233 wet pounds of polymer at a unit price of$0.039 per wet pound. Provisions are In the specifications for four consecutive ona-year contract eMensiens. u IXDIt rt1 m U I D n Katherine Yarosh Senior Buyer j e 1)9rebabove recommendation: Teedd Hoffman Purchasing Mona q �� G. Stree Robert J. Oaten Irector of FI Assistant Director of Operations "F-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(C) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-2° RESOLUTION NO. 92-106 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF CAUSTIC SODA SOLUTION, ECIFI N NO. P-1 3 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF CAUSTIC SODA SOLUTION. SPECIFICATION NO. P-133, TO WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY CORPORATION R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Purchasing Manager that award of contract be made to Western States Chemical Supply Corporation for Purchase of Caustic Soda Solution, Specification No. P-133, and the bid tabulation and recommendation, and proposal submitted for said specification are hereby received and ordered filed; and. Section 2. That a Purchase Contract for Specification No. P-133 be awarded to Western States Chemical Supply Corporation for the price of $271.88 per dry ton plus sales tax, furnished and delivered in accordance with the terms and conditions of said specification and the bid proposal therefor, for a one-year period beginning September 1, 1992, with provision for four one-year extensions upon mutually-agreeable terms; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign said Purchase Contract with said supplier to supply caustic soda solution pursuant to the specifications and purchase contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel ; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said material are hereby ... rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 12, 1992. "G-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-1" July 14. 1992 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS . if OaANGE COUNTY. CAuraRNIA MEMORANDUM 10SW ELLI6 AVENUE To: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager aU ea.e127 RGUNTA1N VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92726A127 mA�eez.2An From: Katherine Yarosh, Senior Buyer ,/ Subject: PURCHASE OF CAUSTIC SODA SOLUTION SPECIFICATION NO. P-133 Sealed bids were opened June 23, 1992, for the purchase and deRvery of Caustic Soda Solution for . a one-year period beginning September 1, 1992. Tabulation of bids Is as follows: PRICE ESTIMATED COMPANY PER DRY TON ANNUAL COST Western States Chemical Supply Corp. $271.88 $897,204.00 Orange, CA Pressure Vessel Service, Inc. $283.00 $933,900.00 Santa Fe Springs, CA Commerce Chemical Company $284.60 $939,180.00 City of Industry, CA Jones Chemicals $297.40 $981,420.00 Torrance, CA Holchem, Inc. $299.90 $989.670.00 Pacoima, CA Ashland Chemical, Inc. $329.00 $1,085.700.00 \"d Santa Fe Springs, CA GPS Industries No BM City of industry, CA I.G. Industrial Company No Bid Rancho Cucamonga, CA It Is recommended the award be made to Western States Chemical Supply Corp.,the lowest responsible odder, for a one-year contract period beginning September 1, 1992. The total estimated annual cost of$897,204.00, plus applicable sales tax, Is based on 3300 ton usage at a unft pdce of$271.88 per dry ton delivered. Provisions are In the specificatlons for four consecutive one-year contract mdension periods. ZJvj frw on b-bl Katherine Yarosh Senior Buyer We herefbyya ur foregoing recommendation: Puri H ^Id Mara G ry G. strewn Robert JJ.00,ten Director of I'milinO Assistant Director of Operations 11G_2N AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS al GRANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 10BaA 2U1B AVENUE IuIY 1, 1992 _ A.O.BOstM9 WYMLW VAX F.M1F0ANA 9272"127 hfEMORANDLM anal Be2sA11 TO: Wayne Sylvester,General Manager FROM: ICetherim Yarosh,Smdor Buyer Subjtte laboratory Services Contact for Analysis of Sludge.Specification No.S-0 3. Sided bide wens opened Thursday May 11, 1992 for the laboratory Service Cwnract for the Analysis of Sludge,for the period of August 12, 1992 through June 30, 1993.Tabulation of Bide is ae follow.: Laboratory Bid Amount TBD Labcratories $16,150.00• Ins Angeles,CA C.L.Technology $25,954.75c Comae,CA MacDnnald4ilephem S30,750.00 Laboratories,Inc. Laguna Blue,CA Applied P sc Ch laboratory $35,2M.00 Pomona.CA BC Amlyticel $39,030.00s Anaheim,CA Associated Laboratories 539,950A0 Orange,CA Trueedeil labomadn SA1,637.00 Tustin,CA • Did not meet bid specifications and therefore mug be miccted. 11 is recommended shot MacDomldStephero Laboraoriea,Inc.,the lowest responsible bidder, be awarded the comract for en emmm not to exceed S30,750. BC Analytical mul TBD Laboratories did ram bid an all items and arc therefore comidged non-.,cursive pectaRes. C.L. Techwlogiee is ram able on comply with she epocifind Reported Dcaction Limits and required method of analysis epecifcetic m for several of the compounds. For thew reasons,it is therefort mcommende l that BC Analytrtel's,TBD laboratories'and C.L.Techmlogice'bide should be mjec+ed. Ifathcrmn Yamsh,Senior Buyer We hereby concur with the foregoing recomererWaOon: n�� Daniel Trembhy,labonmry SttGm Su iwr MAtg' elloq Somme Control Manager for y / Blake And..,Director of Techdcal Services Ina SmProseno. me 1m mal sciences u1smalory oe Mag( AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "H" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Eleven (11) CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE August 12, 19 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduet) $ 136,617.81 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - ADD COMMUNICATION CABLES The Contractor was directed to supply and install approximately 168,000 feet of voiced data and computer cable within the new Central Laboratory. This cable was not included in the original contract as it was originally going to be supplied and installed by Districts personnel . As the Central Laboratory neared completion, the Districts did not have the personnel available to accomplish the needed work. The additional work was accomplished by Contractor's Farce Account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)(8) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 50). The new facility could not be used without the cable system. The additional work added 63 days. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 60,960.33 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 63 Calendar Days Item 2 - ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES The following fixed cast items for additional graded gravel bedding, if required in addition to the requirements of the specifications, are included in the Bid Proposal : Approx. Item uantit Actual Unit Na Unit Description ram o Quantity Price A C.Y. Crushed Rock 0-12" 0 1,500 1,282.33 $27.50 = $ 35,264.08 B C.Y. Crushed Rock 12-24" 0 1,500 1,282.33 $31.50 - 40,393.40 SUBTOTAL - $ 75,657.48 ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 75,657.48 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "I-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "i-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 `J CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Eleven (11) CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE August 12, 1992 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB N0: J-17 TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 136,617.81 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 63 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 63 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date March 1, 1990 Original Contract Time 420 Calendar Days Original Completion Date April 24, 1991 Time Extension this C.O. 63 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 314 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 734 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date March 3, 1992 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 7,090,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 816,307.74 This Change (Add) (oedneE) $ 136,617.81 Amended Contract Price $ 8,042,925.55 "I-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 . . CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Eleven (11) CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE Augu�2,1992 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 Board Authorization Date: August 12, 1992 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTEEDD BY: RECOMMENDED BY: ,,�xng neer Date struction Manager Date APPROVE // APPROVED AS TO FORM: U uate n i c r o� ng nee ng a e enera ounsel J. R. ROBERTS CORPORATION ACCE D BY: .A�l� 1� *DaT Lontractor e `ter✓ "I-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Twelve (12) - CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE August 12. 1992 JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1. Job No. J-19-1 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 51,966.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - LIGHTING SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS ./ This item is for modifications made to the lighting system in the Central Power Generation Building due to errors and omissions in the design drawings and changes in the grounding conductors. This resulted in the need to increase the size of conduit, change the type of wiring, electrical contactor revisions, and additional junction boxes. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH J191-036) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 46,115.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - MODIFY MOTOR CONTROL CENTERS MCC-CGA AND MCC-CGB This item is for supplying and installing three control relays and surge suppressers in the motor control center's MCC-CGA and MCC-CGB. These relays provide a pump available status input which is required by the Districts supplied engine control panels. The relays and surge suppressors were omitted from the contract documents. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH J191-038) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,375.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "J-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 \J CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Twelve (12) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE August 12, 1992 JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1. Job No. J-19-1 Item 3 - ADDITIONAL CABLES FOR MOTOR CONTROL PANELS This item is for additional signal cables required to supply input to vibration monitoring equipment supplied with the Districts-supplied control panels (16CP101, 16CP102, and 16CP103). The cables are routed between junction boxes 3-1 through 3-3 to control panels 16CP101 through 16CP103 respectively. The cables were not included in the contract documents. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH J191-039) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,493.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 - REWORK COLUMNS AT CONTROL ROOM BALCONY The second floor plan on Contract Drawing 2SO4 show the two columns on the control room balcony to be square Mark 4 columns as detailed in the Column Schedule on Contract Drawing 2520. Reinforcing steel was fabricated in accordance with the column schedule details. Contract drawings 2A04, 2A05, and 2A10 show these columns to be round. No structural details were provided in the original contract drawings for these round column shapes. This item is for providing reinforcing steel and added cost for forming transition sections from the square column segments to the round column sections in four locations. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,983.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 51,966.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 0 Calendar Days "J-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) ALL DISTRICTS "J-2° COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY . Page 3 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Twelve (12) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE August 12. 1992 JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1. Job No. J-19-1 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date February 21, 1991 Original Contract Time 600 Calendar Days Original Completion Date October 12, 1992 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 103 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 703 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date January 23, 1993 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 15,410,855.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 416,439.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 51,966.00 �../ Amended Contract Price $ 15,879,260.00 "J-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 4 P: 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Twelve (12) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE August 12, 1992 JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1. Job No. J-19-1 Board Authorization Date: August 12, 1992 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED BY: RECOMMENDED BY: Engineer I Date Construction Manager Date APPROVED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: `` 7 � v Director of Engineering Date Gee al Counsel Date HUNTER CORPORATION ACCEPTED BY: BY::�� 7-&47- Contractor —Q Date "J-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 8 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 ..J CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Twenty-Two (22) CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH & ALPER DATE August 12, 1992 JOB: GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. PI-34-1 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Oedu") $ 56,349.33 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - TRANSFORMER OIL RETENTION CURB AT POWER BUILDING NO. 5 The contract drawings show a concrete curb constructed on the south, west, and north side of Transformer No. 1 and Transformer No. 2. This concrete curb connects to the west wall of Power Building No. 5 to form a transformer oil retention basin. The Contract Drawings for the construction joint between the Power Building No. 5 foundation and the concrete block wall do not include waterstop. This item is for construction of a concrete curb along the power building wall on the east side of the oil retention basin. This item was accomplished by Contractor's Force Account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (B) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1341-027) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,296.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 5 Calendar Days Item 2 - HIGH PRESSURE DIGESTER GAS SUPPLIED FOR WASTE DIGESTER GAS FLARES FOR PLANT NO. 1 This item is for installing 6-inch high pressure digester gas piping from Tunnel Intersection L to the new waste digester gas flare facilities for Plant No. 1. This piping was shown on the drawings as being routed through the tunnel wall in the intersection and capped below grade for future connection by others. The foundation for the new waste digester flare facility was constructed prior to the installation of this future piping connection to avoid delaying the construction of the flare facility project. The gas piping was rerouted through Intersection L, down Tunnel No. 8, and up to the connection at the flare facility. The item was accomplished by Contractor's Force Account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)(B) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P134-024) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5.893.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 5 Calendar Days "K-I" AGENDA ITEM #9( 1 ) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 8 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Twenty-Two (22) CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH & ALPER DATE August 12, 1992 JOB: GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-34-1 Item 3 - REROUTE AND SUPPORT ELECTRICAL CABLE TRAY AND CONDUITS AT INTERSECTION L The contract drawings require the demolition and reconstruction of Intersection L in Tunnel No. B. and require that the Contractor support the existing cable trays and conductors during the demolition and rework of Intersection L. This item is for rerouting the cable tray and conduits to avoid conflicts with new piping and for permanent tray and cable supports. This item was accomplished by Contractor's Force Account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2) (B) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1341-025) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,394.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 18 Calendar Days Item 4 - DIGESTER GAS VENTILATION PIPING FOR GAS COMPRESSORS This item is for the installation of digester gas ventilation piping from the crosshead manifolds and unloader vents on Gas Compressors No's. 1, 2, and 3 to the exterior of the Gas Compressor Building. The ventilation piping is not shown on the contract documents and is required to prevent digester gas from ventilating inside the building. This item was accomplished by Contractor's Force Account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (B) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1341-026) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,605.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 19 Calendar Days Item 5 - GRATING COVER AND PIPING REVISIONS FOR LOW PRESSURE GAS HOLDER TANK DRAIN BOX The contract drawings shows the low pressure gas holder tank drain box without a cover. This item is for providing a fiberglass grating cover with supports for the protection of personnel . This item also includes the installation of an air gap in the box to enable the operator to see when the gas holder condensate is completely drained. This item was accomplished by Contractor's Force Account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (B) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1341-023) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,486.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 4 Calendar Days "K-2" AGENDA ITEM #9( i ) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 8 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER ..� C.O. N0. Twenty-Two (22) CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH & ALPER DATE August 12, 1992 JOB: GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-34-1 Item 6 - DELETE TRANSFORMER CIRCUIT BREAKERS AT POWER BUILDING NO. 5 This item is for deleting two circuit breakers, one each at Transformer No. 1 and Transformer No. 2. One circuit breaker is shown between Transformer No. 1 and 480 Volt Switchgear Lineup 5-A. The other circuit breaker is shown between Transformer No. 2 and 480 Volt Switchgear Lineup 5-B. These circuit breakers are not required at these locations. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH P1341-033) CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (6,045.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 7 - MEDIUM VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR BUS CONNECTIONS This item is for providing bus duct connections between the proposed medium voltage switchgear sections and existing switchgear sections in Power Building 3A. Detailed Specifications do not clearly specify that bus duct connections are required and contractor proposed cable connections between the new and existing switchgear sections. Staff directed Contractor to use bus connections in order to maintain the integrity of the short circuit rating through both the existing switchgear lineup and the proposed new switchgear section. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6 (b) (2) (B) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 22,677.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 8 - HIGH PRESSURE DIGESTER GAS BUTTERFLY VALVES This item is for three 10-inch butterfly valves for the high pressure digester gas system in the basement of the Gas Compressor Building. These valves are required to isolate the chilled water/gas heat exchanger and gas/gas heat exchangers for maintenance purposes. Ball valves are indicated on the piping schematics. However, these valves are not shown on the piping plans and elevations. Butterfly valve requirements on the process and instrument diagrams are also inconsistent with the requirements shown on the Contract drawings. Staff directed the Contractor to install the butterfly valves required to isolate the heat exchangers. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 15,477.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "K-3" AGENDA ITEM #9( I ) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY - Page 4 of 8 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 `...� CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Twenty-Two (22) CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH & ALPER DATE August 12, 1992 JOB: GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-34-1 Item 9 - GROUND FAULT PROTECTION FOR REDUCED VOLTAGE STARTERS This item is for providing ground fault protection for the three gas compressor reduced voltage-autotransformer magnetic starters in Power Building No. 5. Ground fault protection on these starters, located on each gas compressor feeder breaker, will prevent nuisance tripping of the main breaker feeding electrical power to the entire gas compressor facility. This ground fault feature at each starter will cause the individual gas compressor feeder breakers to trip when a ground fault occurs on an individual gas compressor power circuit. Standby compressors will still be available for operation in the event of a ground fault. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2) (A) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 5,679.00 �...� TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 10 Calendar Days Item 10 - REINFORCED CONCRETE TUNNEL PLUG AT TUNNEL NO. 3 This item is for providing a permanent reinforced concrete tunnel plug in existing utility tunnel leading to the existing gas compressor facility. Part of the utility tunnel and the existing compressor facility were demolished under this contract. The tunnel plug is located where the utility tunnel connects to existing Tunnel No. 3. The contract drawings provided for an unreinforced concrete block plug at this location which is normally used for temporary tunnel plugs. Staff recommended that the reinforced cast-in-place concrete plug be constructed since it is a permanent installation. A credit for the unreinforced concrete block is included in the item. This item was negotiated with Contractor pursuant to section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,545.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "K-4" AGENDA ITEM #9( i ) (1 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 8 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Twenty-Two (22) CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH & ALPER DATE August 12, 1992 JOB: GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-34-1 Item 11 - CRANE STOPS FOR BRIDGE CRANE Contractor installed crane stops on the crane rail in the gas compressor facility to provide the limit of hook travels. Subsequent field operations revealed that this installation of the crane stops conflicted with the bridge crane access platform if the bridge crane was moved to the extreme west end of the building. This item is for providing new crane stops at the west end of the crane rails to prevent the bridge crane from moving into the access platform. This item was accomplished by Contractors Force Account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (B) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1341-017) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,010.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 12 - ATMOSPHERIC VENT VALVE REVISIONS A pneumatic operator was added to the atmospheric vent valve in Item 1 of Change Order No. 12. Contractor included a pneumatic operator that would open the atmospheric vent valve at a differential line pressure of 125 psi with an operator air supply of 80 psi in the proposal for that item. The quoted valve operator was discovered to be incorrect during the submittal process as the actual service requirements indicated that the operator should be capable of operating the valve at a differential line pressure of 0.6 psi with an operator air supply of 40 psi . This item is for the added cost to provide the pneumatic operator which is capable of operating the valve under actual conditions. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,937.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "K-5" AGENDA ITEM #9( i ) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-5" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 6 of 8 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Twenty-Two (22) CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH & ALPER DATE August 12, 1992 JOB: GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-34-1 Item 13 - CITY WATER PUMP STATION VFD CONTROL SELECTOR SWITCHES The contract drawings require that hand-off-automatic switches (HOA) be provided at the City Water Pump Station Control Panel . The Detailed Specifications also require that HOA switches be provided on the three variable frequency drive enclosures. Two switches cannot operate one drive. This item is for removing the switches from the city water pump station control panel and installing blank covers. Additional contact blocks and associated wiring to the HOA switches in each drive cabinet are also included in this item. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 894.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 14 - SPARE ELECTRONIC CARDS This is a credit item for spare electronic cards as required by The Detailed Specifications. Contractor is providing monetary credit in lieu of the spare cards specified. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ (8,498.67) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 56,349.33 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 61 Calendar Days "K-6" AGENDA ITEM #9( 1 ) (1 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-6" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 7 of 8 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Twenty-Two (22) CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH & ALPER DATE_ August 12, 1992 JOB: GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-34-1 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 61 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date February 27, 1990 Original Contract Time 730 Calendar Days Original Completion Date February 26, 1992 Time Extension this C.O. 61 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 168 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 898 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date August 12, 1992 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 13,098,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 597,290.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 56,349.33 Amended Contract Price $ 13,751,639.33 "K-7" AGENDA ITEM #9( 1 ) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-7" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 8 of 8 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Twenty-Two (22) CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH & ALPER DATE August 12, 1992 JOB: GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-34-1 Board Authorization Date: August 12, 1992 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED BY: RECOMMENDED BY: 7�Q L� �- 3 Z 7-o-rz Engineer Date 9dinstruction Manager Date APPROVED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ,2// G Qti� _z _ I 7rs 9v Director of Engineering Date Gen al Counsel Date ZIEBARTH & ALPER ACCEPTED BY: Q ;L -1-i3-ft Contra for Date �✓ "K-8" AGENDA ITEM #9( 1 ) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-8" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Twenty-Three (23) CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH & ALPER DATE August 12. 1992 JOB: GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-34-1 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $(61.818.63) In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - ASSEMBLY OF GAS COMPRESSOR SKIDS AT PLANT NO. 2 The Detailed Specifications require that each compressor unit have all required components mounted on a skid. The three package P2 digester gas compressors were delivered to Plant No. 2 in separate components which required assembly of each compressor onto its respective skid. This item is a credit item to reimburse the Districts for direct cost required to assemble the Package P2 digester gas compressors onto skids. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6 (b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (33,000.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - GAS COMPRESSOR CYLINDER VALVE AND BEARING SPARE PARTS This item is a settlement of a dispute over the interpretation of the contract requirements for spare gas compressor cylinder valves and bearings. Districts recognize that the intent of the specifications is unclear and this credit item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2) (A) of the General Provisions. The Districts has received 12 spare cylinder valves and two sets of bearings. CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (10,000.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS. CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "L-1" AGENDA ITEM #9( i ) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Twenty-Three (23) CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH & ALPER DATE August 12, 1992 JOB: GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-34-1 Item 3 - SPARE INSTRUMENTS FOR DIGESTER GAS COMPRESSORS This is a credit item for spare field mounted instruments and panel mounted instruments as required by The Detailed Specifications. Contractor is providing monetary credit in lieu of the spare parts specified above which cannot be received in a timely manner. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2) (A) of the General Provisions. CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (18,818.63) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 - CRITERIA FOR CREDIT DEDUCTED FROM COMPRESSOR PAYMENTS Change Order No. 2, Item 1, allowed progress payments for the engineering, fabrication, machining, and delivery of the gas compressors and related equipment and controls. The progress payments were paid jointly to both the Contractor and the primary supplier of the gas compressors. Items 1, 2, and 3 of this change order are credits for field assembly of the Package P2 gas compressors and also spare parts for the compressors and related controls. This item assigns the credit for these items to be deducted from the funds set aside for progress payments in Change Order No. 2, Item 1. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ (61,818.63) TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days "L-2" AGENDA ITEM #90 ) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Twenty-Three (23) CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH & ALPER DATE August 12, 1992 JOB: GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-34-1 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME - Original Contract Date February 27, 1990 Original Contract Time 730 Calendar Days Original Completion Date February 26, 1992 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 168 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 898 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date August 12, 1992 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 13,098,000.00 Prev. Auth. Chan es $ 653 639.33 This Change (Add (Deduct) $ (61,818.63) Amended Contract Price $ 13,689,820.70 "L-3" AGENDA ITEM #9( i ) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Twenty-Three (23) CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH & ALPER DATE August 12, 1992 JOB: GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-34-1 Board Authorization Date: August 12, 1992 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED BY: RECOMMENDED BY: Efigineer Date Construction Manager Date APPROVED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: . �41 , � - i,9 QLy /5 , Director of Engineering Date Gen al Counsel Date ZIEBARTH & ALPER ACCEPTED BY: Contrac or Date "L-4" AGENDA ITEM #4( 1 ) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-4" RESOLUTION NO. 92-107 ACCEPTING JOB NO. P1-34-1 AS COMPLETE �✓ A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING JOB NO. P1-34-1 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Ziebarth & Alper, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Gas Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-1, on May 26, 1992; and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Director of Engineering has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Gas Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-1, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated February 27, 1990; and, Section 4. That the Districts' Director of Engineering is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Zlebarth & Alper, setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Gas Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PI-34-1, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel ; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for Itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts. `...� PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 12, 1992. „M„ AGENDA ITEM #9( 1 ) (3) - ALL DISTRICTS "M" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE . FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Twelve (12) CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors. Division of DATE August 12, 1992 Zurn Constructors. Inc. JOB: Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-3: Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation Plant No. 1. Job No. PI-35-2: and Installation of Waste Digester Gas Flare Facilities at Plants 1 and 2. Job No. J-21 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 10,336.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Job No. P1-34-3 Item 1 - ELECTRICAL CONNECTIONS TO MOTORIZED DOOR The wiring of the electric motor operated roll-up door in Control Building 15-16 is not shown on the contract drawings. The Contractor was directed to add the electrical connections necessary from this motor to MCC "DB". The installation includes approximately 200 linear feet of cable and 70 feet of conduit as well as a 30 amp disconnect switch. The work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO-46) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,884.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - MISCELLANEOUS HVAC DUCT MODIFICATIONS Two modifications to the fiberglass ventilation ducts were necessary to facilitate installation. In one instance the duct configuration had to be modified in order to avoid conflict with another piece of equipment in the Control Building basement. The other modification resulted from a detail missing from the contract drawings. This detail provided a watertight seal for the ductwork at the Control Building roofs where the ducts pass into the building This work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO-49) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,452.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 10,336.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days "N-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(J ) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3 P. 0. BOX "8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Twelve (12) CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors. Division of DATE August 12, 1992 Zurn Constructors. Inc. JOB: Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-34-3: Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-35-2: and Installation of Waste Digester Gas Flare Facilities at Plants 1 and 2. Job No. J-21 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time extension is required for this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, lasses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF MILESTONE TIME Job No. P1-35-2 Original Contract Date January 28, 1991 Original Milestone Time 365 Calendar Days Original Milestone Completion Date January 27, 1992 ..J Milestone Modification This Change Order 0 Calendar Days Total Milestone Modification 28 Calendar Days Revised Milestone Time 393 Calendar Days Revised Milestone Date February 24, 1992 Job No. J-21 Original Contract Date January 28, 1991 Original Milestone Time 180 Calendar Days Original Milestone Completion Date July 26, 1991 Milestone Modification This Change Order 0 Calendar Days Total Milestone Modification 25 Calendar Days Revised Milestone Time 205 Calendar Days Revised Milestone Date August 20, 1991 SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Job No. P1-34-3 Original Contract Date January 28, 1991 Original Contract Time 900 Calendar Days Original Completion Date July 15, 1993 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 27 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 927 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date August 11, 1993 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable "N 2 " AGENDA ITEM #9(i ) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-2 „ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. No. Twelve (12) CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE August 12, 1992 Zurn Constructors, Inc. JOB: Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-3: Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-2: and Installation of Waste Digester Gas Flare Facilities at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-21 Original Contract Price $ 27,205,378.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 606,022.54 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 10,336.00 Amended Contract Price $ 27,821,736.54 Board Authorization Date: August 12, 1992 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED BY: RECOMMENDED BY: J 7 9t Engineer Date Co struction Manager Date APPROVED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: erector of Engineering Date Ge al Counsel Date ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, DIVISION OF ZURN CONSTRUCTORS, INC. ACCEPTED BY: Contractor Date "N-3" AGENDA ITEM#9(j ) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX$127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 ,y 10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92708-7016 (714)962-2411 July 29, 1992 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum No. 8 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers in Connection with Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19 In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee for Addendum No. 8 with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for additional construction support services, and load shedding studies with plans and specifications for Central Power Generation Systems, Job No J-19, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed $292,024.00 as follows: Existing Change per Amended Agreement Addn. 8 Agreement Professional Services, (hourly rates including labor plus overhead at 175%), not to exceed $3,229,314 $259,506 $3,488,820 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 398,107 20,670 418,777 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 162,700 -0- 162,700 Fixed Profit 4,179,112 1 � 4 471 839 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/William Mahoney /s/Evelyn Hart William Mahoney Evelyn Hart Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Thomas M. Dawes Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering Selection Committee 11011 AGENDA ITEM #9(k) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS 11011 RESOLUTION NO. 92-108 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 8 TO AGREEMENT WITH BROWN AND CALDWELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN OF JOB NO. J-19 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 8 TO AGREEMENT WITH BROWN AND CALDWELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN OF CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEMS, JOB NO. J-19, PROVIDING FOR ADDITIONAL INSPECTION AND DESIGN SERVICES k * k k * k * * k * * k k k k k * WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for preliminary design of Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19 (subsequently divided into Job Nos. J-19-1 and J-19-2) ; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to said agreement provided for additional services necessary relative to application and processing of a Permit to Construct from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD); and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 2 to said agreement provided for additional services required for background NOx and health risk assessment modeling information required by SCAQMD; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 3 to said agreement provided for phased final design of said project; Phase I work to commence immediately for electrical system configuration studies, digester gas system modifications and ongoing South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) permitting interface, and Phase II work for final design, construction and training services to commence upon receipt of a permit to construct from SCAQMD; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 4 to said agreement provided for design of a steam turbine system to be incorporated into the project to take advantage of .engine p-1 AGENDA ITEM #9(k) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "p-1" heat to produce additional electricity; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 5 to said agreement provided for design of digester hot water loop replacement for the systems heat removal at both plants; design modifications to gas system at Digesters A and B; and design of backup cooling water source for the new Ocean Outfall Booster Station at Plant No. 2; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 6 provided for a reallocation of the costs among categories within said agreement; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 7 provided for additional construction support services; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend said agreement to provide for additional inspection and design services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of Directors on April 8, 1992, the Selection Committee has negotiated and certified a fee for said services, in accordance with established procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 8 dated August 12, 1992, to that certain Professional Services Agreement dated July 9, 1966, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers, for design of Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19, providing for additional inspection and design services, is hereby approved and accepted; and, "P-2" AGENDA ITEM #9( k) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "P-2" Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased by an amount not to exceed $292,024.00, as follows, increasing the maximum authorized compensation from $4,179,112.00 to an amount not to exceed $4,471,136.00: Amended Existing Change per Maximum Authorization Addendum No. 8 Authorization Professional Services, at hourly rates for labor plus overhead at 175%, not to exceed $3,229,314.00 $259,506.00 $3,448,820.00 Direct Expenses, at cost, not to exceed 398,107.00 20,670.00 418,777.00 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 162,700.00 -0- 162,700.00 Fixed Profit 388,991.00 11,848.00 400,839.00 TOTALS, not to exceed $4,179,112.00 $292,024.00 $4,471,136.00 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby �•,d authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 8 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 12, 1992. „P-3„ AGENDA ITEM #9(k) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "P-3" 6FN\TATIONO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 w 10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 ON1hEE COVY, (714) 962-2411 1 July 29, 1992 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Specific Term Employment Agreement with J. T. Horvath 8 Associates for Specialized Construction Management Services in Connection with Construction of Various Master-Planned Projects In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of consultant services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with J. T. Horvath 8 Associates for specialized construction management and inspection services on master-planned construction projects, at hourly rates, plus direct expenses at cost, for a two-year period beginning October 11, 1992, and providing for a one-year extension. Construction Management Services, at the hourly rate of $39.20 for the First Year $40.95 for the Second Year $42.80 Optional Third Year The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/William Mahoney /s/Evelyn Hart William Mahoney Evelyn Hart Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Thomas M. Dawes - Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering `...� Selection Committee "0-1" AGENDA ITEM #9( 1 ) (1 ) - ALL DISTRICTS 11p-1E1 - RESOLUTION NO. 92-109 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH J. T. HORVATH & ASSOCIATES FOR SPECIALIZED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND IN PE TION SERVICES RE VARIOUS MASTER-PLANNED CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH J. T. HORVATH & ASSOCIATES FOR SPECIALIZED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION SERVICES RE VARIOUS MASTER-PLANNED CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS t k t * t t X t k X * t * t X * * t WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with J. T. Horvath & Associates for specialized construction management and inspection services re various master-planned construction projects; and, WHEREAS, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has certified the final negotiated fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Agreement dated August 12, 1992, by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 69 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County and J. T. Horvath & Associates for specialized construction management and inspection services re various master-planned construction projects, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in "p-2" AGENDA ITEM #9( 1 ) (2) ALL DISTRICTS "Q-2" accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, on an as-needed basis, for a two-year period beginning October 11, 1992 to October 10, 1994, with option for a one-year extension at the following hourly rates: Agreement Period Hourly Rate 10/11/92 - 10/10/93 $39.20 10/11/93 - 10/10/94 40.95 10/11/94 - 10/10/95 42.80 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 12, 1992. "0-3" AGENDA ITEM #9( l ) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "a-3" RESOLUTION NO. 92-110 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WI R MARTIN KORDICK, SR. FOR SPECIALIZED CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SERVICES RE VARIOUS MASTER- PLANNED CONSTRUCTION PR JECT5 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MARTIN KORDICK, SR. FOR SPECIALIZED CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SERVICES RE VARIOUS MASTER-PLANNED CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS, PROVIDING FOR EXTENSION OF SAID AGREEMENT WITH NO INCREASE IN THE HOURLY RATE k k ! * k k k * k k k * k * * k k WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into a Professional Services Agreement with Martin Kordick, Sr. for specialized construction inspection services re various master-planned construction projects; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. I to said agreement provided for extension of the agreement for an additional two-year period and to increase the hourly rate for said services; and, 1..� WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to amend the agreement with Martin Kordick, Sr. to provide for extension of said agreement from August 10, 1992 through December 31, 1992, with no increase in the hourly rate for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 2 dated August 12, 1992, to that certain Professional Services Agreement dated August 10, 1988, by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11. 13 and 14 and Martin Kordick, Sr. , for specialized construction inspection services re various master-planned construction projects, On an as-needed basis, providing for extension of said "R-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(m) - ALL DISTRICTS "R-1" agreement from August 10, 1992 through December 31, 1992 with no increase in the hourly rate, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said additional services is hereby authorized at the hourly rate of $42.50 for the second year beginning August 10, 1991, plus mileage reimbursement for on-the-,job travel ; and. Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 2 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 12, 1992. "R-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(m) - ALL DISTRICTS „R-2„ RESOLUTION NO. 92-118 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH THE GARDEN GROVE AGENCY FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 2 AND 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH THE GARDEN GROVE AGENCY FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RE PAYMENT OF PROPORTIONAL ANNUAL TAX INCREMENT TO DISTRICTS FOR SEWERAGE SERVICES t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t WHEREAS, the Garden Grove Agency for Community Development of the City of Garden Grove has proposed an amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the Garden Grove Community Project; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Community Redevelopment Law, California Health and Safety Code Sections 33000 et seq. , the Sanitation Districts' ad valorem taxes in the redevelopment project area will be frozen at the base year levy; all subsequent annual tax increments accruing to the redevelopment agency during its life; and, WHEREAS, because the Sanitation Districts partially rely on ad valorem taxes to finance the cost of sewerage services which are escalating due to federally mandated requirements, energy impacts and inflationary trends; and, WHEREAS, recognizing that the freezing of taxes may result in inadequate ad valorem tax revenues to cover the cost of providing sewerage service to the redevelopment project areas, representatives of the Garden Grove Agency for Community Development of the City of Garden Grove have agreed to pay the Districts a percentage of their historical proportional share of the annual tax Increment accruing to the agency to defray the cost of said service, on essentially the same basis as other properties in the Districts. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts "S-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(q) - DISTRICTS 2 & 3 "S-1" Nos. 2 and 3 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Agreement dated by and between County Sanitation District Nos. 2 and 3 of Orange County and the Garden Grove Agency for Community Development, providing for payment to the respective District of a percentage of its historical proportional share of the annual tax from the property tax increment from property in the area within proposed amendment to the Redevelopment Plan to the Garden Grove Agency for Community Development of the City of Garden Grove, to pay for escalating costs of sewerage service on the same basis as other properties in the respective Districts, be, and are hereby, approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 2, acting for Itself and on behalf of District No. 3, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 12, 1992. "S-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(q) - DISTRICTS 2 & 3 „S_2„ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 9127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-e t27 10044 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92709-7018 "roe cW (714)962-2411 July 8, 1992 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 2 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Professional Services Agreement with Church Engineering, Inc. for Preparation of Design in Connection with Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1 In accordance with the District's procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with Church Engineering, Inc. for the preparation of plans and specifications, and construction support in connection with Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-941, on an hourly-rate basis including labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants fees and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed $119,524, as follows: Professional Services, (hourly rates including labor plus overhead at 141%), not to exceed $ 92,840 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 8,200 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 9,200 Fixed Profit 9,284 TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed $119,524 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/Hank Wedaa /s/John Collins Hank Wedaa, Chairman John Collins, Chairman pro tem District No. 2 District No. 2 Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Thomas M. Dawes omas M. Dawes Director of Engineering Selection Committee 77T77 AGENDA ITEM #9( r) (1) - DISTRICT 2 "T" RESOLUTION NO. 92-119-2 APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CHURCH ENGINEERING, INC. FOR DESIGN AND �../ CONSTRUCTION SERVICES RE CONTRACT NO. 2-9-R1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CHURCH ENGINEERING, INC. FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES FOR REHABILITATION OF CYPRESS AVENUE SUBTRUNK SEWER, FROM IMPERIAL HIGHWAY WEST OF KRAEMER BOULEVARD TO THE INTERSECTION OF YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD AND ASSOCIATED ROAD, CONTRACT NO. 2-9-R1 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County has heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures, an agreement has been negotiated with Church Engineering, Inc. for design and construction support services for Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, from Imperial Highway West of Kraemer Boulevard to the intersection of Yo rba Linda Boulevard and Associated Road, Contract No. 2-9-R1; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Board of Directors on March 11, 1992, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has certified the final negotiated fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Professional Services Agreement dated August 12, 1992, by and between County Sanitation District No. 2 and Church Engineering, Inc. , for design and construction support services for "U-1" AGENDA ITEM #9( r) (2) - DISTRICT 2 "U-1" Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, from Imperial Highway West of Kraemer Boulevard to the intersection of Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associated Road, Contract No. 2-9-R1, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows: Professional Services, at hourly rates for labor plus overhead at 141%, not to exceed $ 92,840.00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 8,200.00 Subconsuitants, not to exceed 9,200.00 Fixed Profit 9,284.00 TOTAL, not to exceed $119,524.00 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreement in form approved by the General Counsel . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 12, 1992. "U-2" AGENDA ITEM #9( r) (2) - DISTRICT 2 "U-2" RESOLUTION NO. 92-120 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACT NO A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 5 AND 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO BITTER POINT AND ROCKY POINT PUMP STATIONS, CONTRACT NO. 5-32, AND IMPROVEMENTS TO BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-33 > : : • * • e * ■ e : • It : : : WHEREAS, Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates (RBF) , Districts' engineers, have completed preparation of the plans and specifications for Improvements to Bitter Point and Rocky Point Pump Stations, Contract No. 5-32, and Improvements to Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the proposed project for Improvements to Bitter Point and Rocky Point Pump Stations, Contract No. 5-32, and Improvements to Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33, is hereby approved. Said project was included in the Program Environmental Impact Report on the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan approved on July 19, 1989. A Notice of Determination was filed by the Secretary on July 20, 1989, in accordance with the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and, Section 2. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates (RBF) , Districts' engineers, for Improvements to Bitter Point and Rocky Point Pump Stations, Contract No. 5-32, and Improvements to Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33, are hereby approved and adopted; and, "V-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(s) - DISTRICTS 5 8 6 "V-1" Section 3. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Public Contracts Code of the State of California; and, Section 4. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 5. That the Secretary and the Districts' Director of Engineering or his designee be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 12, 1992. "V-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(s) - DISTRICTS 5 & 6 "V-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Four (4) CONTRACTOR: SILVERI & LE BOUEF DATE August 12. 1992 JOB: IMPROVEMENTS TO BAYSIDE DRIVE TRUNK SEWER, PHASE 3. CONTRACT NO. 5-34-3 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 104,000.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item I - SCHEDULE OF WORK WITH BONUS The Contract Special Provisions and Detailed Specifications provides a bonus/penalty clause for completion of the first tunnel section and open cut sections. Location and time limits are from Marguerite Avenue to Station ,.� 69+72.57, from January 6, 1992 to April 15, 1992. The Contractor completed this bonus section five days ahead of the original bonus completion date. Item 3 of Change Order No. 3 extended the bonus completion date by 35 calendar days. Item 4 of Change Order No. 3 extended the total time by 14 days due to rain. Twelve of the 14 days extend the bonus period. Bonus/penalty for each additional calendar day is $2,000.00. Days Original early completion 5 Tunneling slowdown caused by rock 35 Rain extension 12 Total bonus days 52 The Contractor, therefore, earned a total of 52 bonus days and is entitled to a bonus of $104,000.00. Contractor accomplished this work in accordance with and pursuant to Section 52-8, Sequence of Work, of the Contract Special Provisions and Detailed Specifications. (Reference: FCO No. 11) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 104,000.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 104.000.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days "W-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(t) - DISTRICT 5 11W-111 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS. OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE - FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Four (4) CONTRACTOR: SILVERI & LE BOUEF DATE August 12. 1992 JOB: IMPROVEMENTS TO BAYSIDE DRIVE TRUNK SEWER, PHASE 3. CONTRACT NO. 5-34-3 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date September 10, 1991 Original Contract Time 365 Calendar Days Original Completion Date September 9, 1992 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 14 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 379 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date September 23, 1992 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 3,267,992.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 785 394.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 104,000.00 Amended Contract Price $ 4,157,386.00 „W_211 AGENDA ITEM #9(t) - DISTRICT 5 „W-2„ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Four (4) CONTRACTOR: SILVERI & LE BOUEF DATE August 12. 1992 JOB: IMPROVEMENTS TO BAYSIDE DRIVE TRUNK SEWER, PHASE 3. CONTRACT NO. 5-34-3 Board Authorization Date: August 12, 1992 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED BY: RECOMMENDED BY: Ev4ineer Date ons on Manager Date APPROVED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: z6L -,A 14 ;'-0-f 2,- —, 7 �71' Director of Engineering Date ben al Counsel Date SILVERI & LE BOUEF LED BY: 7�9 Z Contractor Date "W-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(t) — DISTRICT 5 "W-3" RESOLUTION NO. 92-121-7 AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 7-1B-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR ABANDONMENT OF PORTION OF MACARTHUR TRUNK SEWER WITHIN JOHN fir' WAYNE AIRPORT, CONTRACT NO. 7-18-1 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. In accordance with the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, the Board Of Directors, on July 7, 1992, authorized filing a Notice of Exemption for Abandonment Of Portion of MacArthur Trunk Sewer within John Wayne Airport, Contract No. 7-1B-1; and, Section 2. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Board of Directors by the Districts' Director of Engineering that award of contract be made to Colich Bros. , Inc. dba Colich 8 Sons, for Abandonment of Portion of MacArthur Trunk Sewer within John Wayne Airport, Contract No. 7-1B-1, and bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That the contract for Abandonment of Portion of MacArthur Trunk Sewer within John Wayne Airport, Contract No. 7-18-1, be awarded to Colich Bros. , Inc. dba Colich 8 Sons in the total amount of $62,000.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, 11X-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(u) - DISTRICT 7 11X-1" in form approved by the General Counsel ; and, Section 5. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 12, 1992. "X-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(u) - DISTRICT 7 "X-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS AI ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA July 20, 1992 11:00 a.m. 100A4 ELLIS AVENUE >O.BOA W27 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 9272BL8127 B I D TABULATION P141 Iwz.2AI1 S H E E T CONTRACT NO. 7-1B-1 PROJECT TITLE Abandonment of Portion of MacArthur Trunk Sewer within John Wayne Airport, Contract No. 7-15-1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Abandon existing VCP sewer under runway of John Wayne Airport ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $60,000.00 BUDGET AMOUNT $100,000.00 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BIDc=`===_ 1. Colich Bros. , Inc. dba Colich 8 Sons Gardena, CA $62,000.00 2. Dorado Enterprises, Inc. Fountain Valley, CA $63,995.00 3. A. W. Davies, Inc. Rancho Cucamonga, CA $86,800.00 4. Brinderson Irvine, CA $87,150.00 5. Mladen Buntich Sunland, CA $94,650.00 I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I , therefore, recommend award to Colich 8 Sons in the bid amount of $62,000.00 as the lowest and best bid. Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering FFX_3FF AGENDA ITEM #9(u) -DISTRICT 7 X-3FF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS -AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (I) CONTRACTOR: Colich & Sons DATE August 12, 1992 JOB: IRVINE-NEWPORT SUBTRUNK RELIEF SEWER. CONTRACT NO. 7-3E-2 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 92,407.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - TELEPHONE DUCTS NOT AS SHOWN ON PLANS The Contractor discovered telephone ducts at a different elevation than indicated in the contract documents. It was determined that the existing telephone ducts would impact the construction of the new sewer line in that the new line could not be constructed as shown. The Contractor was directed to stop work until a redesign could be done. To solve the problem, the Contractor was directed to construct an additional 180 feet of new 15-inch sewer line and change both profile and points of connection. The additional sewer line was needed to allow the new sewer line to be constructed at elevations which would provide the proper grade for sewage to flow under the existing telephone ducts. The added work consisted of additional potholing, excavation, placement of 180 feet of 15-inch VCP, slurry backfill , demolition and replacement of asphalt paving, and tunneling under and supporting three 48-inch CMP storm drain lines. This work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO No's. 1, 2, and 3) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 58,064.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 34 Calendar Days Item 2 - UNDISCLOSED TELEPHONE DUCT AT STATION NO. 89+86 The Contractor encountered an undisclosed telephone duct at Station No. 89+86 during the excavation for the new sewer line. The Contractor was directed to hand excavate around the telephone duct and proceed with caution to prevent damage to the unmarked utility. The costs for this item includes labor and equipment for the slower production while working around the utility. This item was accomplished by Contractor's Force Account pursuant to Section 10-6(B) (2) (b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 4) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,289.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "Y-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(v) (1) - DISTRICT 7 Y_1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: Colich & Sons DATE August 12, 1992 JOB:_ IRVINE-NEWPORT SUBTRUNK RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 7-3E-2 Item 3 - UNDISCLOSED 6-INCH SEWER LATERAL The Contractor encountered an undisclosed leaking 6-inch sewer lateral at Station No. 93+25 during the excavation for the new sewer line. The Contractor was directed to hand excavate around the sewer lateral and make the necessary repairs. The costs include labor, materials, and equipment to work around the lateral and make repairs. This item was accomplished by Contractor's Force Account pursuant to Section 10-6(B) (2) (b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 5) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,205.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 - UNDISCLOSED AND UNKNOWN UTILITY The Contractor encountered an unknown and undisclosed 12-inch steel pipeline during excavation for the new sewer line at Station No. 92+60. The Contractor was directed to proceed with caution and hand excavate around the 12-inch pipe. The owner of the pipe could not be determined, although the pipeline appeared to be an old oil line. The costs includes labor and equipment for slow production and hand excavation. This item was accomplished by Contractor's Force Account pursuant to Section 10-6(B) (2) (b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 6) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,309.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 5 - UNDISCLOSED 8-INCH SEWER LATERAL The Contractor encountered an undisclosed 8-inch sewer lateral at Station No. 95+90 while excavating for the new sewer line. The Contractor was directed to connect the undisclosed sewer lateral to the new sewer line. This added work included VCP fittings to make the connection as well as labor and equipment. This item was accomplished by Contractor's Force Account pursuant to Section 10-6(B) (2) (b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 7) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,134.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Day "Y-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(v) (1) - DISTRICT 7 "Y-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY . Page 3 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE \� FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: Colich & Sons DATE August 12. 1992 JOB: IRVINE-NEWPORT SUBTRUNK RELIEF SEWER. CONTRACT NO. 7-3E-2 Item 6 - UNDISCLOSED UTILITIES AT NEW MANHOLE STATION NO. 96+70 The Contractor encountered an undisclosed 6-inch sewer lateral and a 1-inch water line at the location for the new manhole at Station No. 96+70. The Contractor was directed to make necessary modifications to the sewer lateral and connect the lateral to the new manhole. Also, the Contractor was directed to repair and reroute the undisclosed water line in order to construct the new manhole. The costs includes material , equipment, and labor to make the necessary relocations of the undisclosed sewer and water lines. This item was accomplished by Contractor's Force Account pursuant to Section 10-6(B) (2) (b) of the general provisions. (Reference: FCO 8) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 10,156.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days Item 7 - SCHEDULE OF WORK WITH BONUS The contract specified provisions providing a bonus/penalty clause for completion of the contract. A bonus payment of $250 per calendar day will be made to the Contractor for each day of early completion of the work prior to the date of final completion. The contract has been extended by 37 calendar days due to. extra work for undisclosed utilities pursuant to Items 1, 5, and 6 of this change order. The Contractor also completed the contract work 20 calendar days ahead of the revised completion date. The Contractor therefore earned a total of 57 bonus days and is entitled to a bonus of $14,250.00. This item is in accordance with and pursuant to Section 50-8, Time of Completion and Liquidated Damages, of the Contract Special Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 14,250.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 92,407.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 37 Calendar Days "Y-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(v) (1) - DISTRICT 7 "Y-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE - FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: Colich & Sons DATE August 12, 1992 JOB: IRVINE-NEWPORT SUBTRUNK RELIEF SEWER. CONTRACT NO, 7-3E-2 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 37 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. 1..� SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date February 20, 1992 Original Contract Time 90 Calendar Days Original Completion Date May 19, 1992 Time Extension this C.O. 37 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 37 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 127 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date June 25, 1992 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 177,692.00 Prev. Auth. Chan es $ -0- This Change (Add} (Deduct) $ 92.407,00 Amended Contract Price $ 270,099.00 "Y-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(v) (1) - DISTRICT 7 "Y-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: Colich & Sons DATE August 12, 1992 JOB: IRVINE-NEWPORT SUBTRUNK RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 7-3E-2 Board Authorization Date: August 12, 1992 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED nBY: RECOMMENDED BY: En ineer Date Construction Manager Date APPROVED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: '01 L. 74-7 Q q" � 7/7 Director of Engineering Date General Counsel Date COLICH & SONS ACC ED BY: 1-8%7— C ntractor Date "Y-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(v) (1) — DISTRICT 7 "Y-5" RESOLUTION NO. 92-122-7 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 7-3E-2 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY `...✓ SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING IRVINE-NEWPORT SUBTRUNK RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 7-3E-2, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT k k k * * k * k * * k k * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Colich & Sons, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Irvine-Newport Subtrunk Relief Sewer, Contract No. 7-3E-2, on June 2, 1992; and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Director of Engineering has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Irvine-Newport Subtrunk Relief Sewer, Contract No. 7-3E-2, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated February 20, 1992; and, Section 4. That the Districts' Director of Engineering is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Colich & Sons setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Irvine-Newport Subtrunk Relief Sewer, Contract No. 7-3E-2, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel ; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 7 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 12, 1992. "Z" AGENDA ITEM #9(v) (2) - DISTRICT 7 "Z" RESOLUTION NO. 92-123-7 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACT N - -1-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ABANDONMENT OF RED HILL PUMP STATION, PHASE 1, CONTRACT NO. 7-14-1-1 WHEREAS, Boyle Engineering Corporation, Districts' engineers, have completed preparation of the plans and specifications for Abandonment of Red Hill Pump Station, Phase 1, Contract No. 7-14-1-1. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That pursuant to the District's Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, the District has concurrently undertaken an environmental review of the proposed project and hereby determines that said project is categorically exempt from further CEQA requirements; and, Section 2. That Abandonment of Red Hill Pump Station, Phase 1, Contract No. 7-14-1-1, is hereby approved, and that the Secretary be directed to file any documents required by said Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and, Section 3. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Boyle Engineering Corporation, District's engineers, for Abandonment of Red Hill Pump Station, Phase 1, Contract No. 7-14-1-1, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 3. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Public Contracts Code of "AA-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(w) - DISTRICT 7 „AA-I" the State of California; and, Section 4. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 5. That the Secretary and the District's Director of Engineering `a+� or his designee be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 12, 1992. "AA-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(w) - DISTRICT 7 "AA-2" RESOLUTION NO. 92-124-7 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS RE CONTRACT NO. 7-1-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS TO OCFCD FOR RELOCATION OF GISLER- RED HILL TRUNK SEWER SIPHON UNDER THE SANTA ANA-DELHI CHANNEL, CONTRACT NO. 7-1-2, IN CONJUNCTION WITH OCFCD IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SANTA ANA-DELHI CHANNEL IN THE CITIES OF TUSTIN, IRVINE, SANTA ANA, COSTA MESA AND UNINCORPORATED COUNTY TERRITORY WHEREAS, the Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) proposes to reconstruct the Santa Ana-Delhi Channel in the Cities of Tustin, Irvine, Santa Ana, Costa Mesa and unincorporated County territory; and, WHEREAS, the District operates a siphon sewer crossing OCFCD's right-of-way which is in conflict with OCFCD's proposed improvements to the Santa Ana-Delhi Channel ; and, WHEREAS, District acquired a permit from OCFCD for said sewer siphon in November 1965 which requires the District to relocate its facilities at District expense upon written notice by OCFCD, which said notice was received on February 21, 1992; and, WHEREAS, public inconvenience can be minimized and a cost savings can be realized by the District and OCFCD by relocation of the District's sewer siphon by the OCFCD in conjunction with their improvements to the Santa Ana-Delhi Channel . NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: "BB-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(x) - DISTRICT 7 "BB-1" Section 1. That the certain Agreement dated 1992, by and between County Sanitation District No. 7 and the Orange County Flood Control District, providing for Relocation of Gisler-Red Hill Trunk Sewer Siphon under the Santa Ana-Delhi Channel , Contract No. 7-1-2, by OCFCD in conjunction with OCFCD improvements to Santa Ana-Delhi Channel , in the Cities of Tustin, Irvine, Santa Ana, Costa Mesa and unincorporated County territory, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That District No. 7 shall pay for the actual cost of said relocation plus 5% for administration, and shall deposit the sum of $55,000.00 (estimated cost) with County's Environmental Management Agency, in accordance with the terms and conditions of said agreement; and, Section 3. That the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 12, 1992. "BB-2" AGENDA ITEM #9 W - DISTRICT 7 "BB-2" RESOLUTION NO. 92-111 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH RJN COMPUTER SERVICES INC. RE SPECIFICATION NS-059 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH RJN COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. FOR COMPUTER-AIDED SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR - MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT, SPECIFICATION NO. S-059 t k t t k f t t f f t t t t t t t t WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with RJN Computer Services, Inc. for Computer-Aided Support System for Maintenance Management, Specification No. S-059; and, WHEREAS, a Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Computerization, established pursuant to said procedures, has considered said agreement and \%�I recommends approval thereof in a report to the Boards of Directors dated July 16, 1992. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Agreement dated August 12, 1992, by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County and RJN Computer Services, Inc., for Computer-Aided Support System for Maintenance Management, Specification No. S-059, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in a total "CC-1" AGENDA ITEM #11 (b) - ALL DISTRICTS "CC-1" amount not to exceed $548,525.00 including all applicable taxes, in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement; and, - Section 3. That the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 12, 1992. "CC-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "CC-2" RESOLUTION NO. 92-112 APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR SPECIFIC PLAN F SITE USE AND DEVELOPMENT W TH HE CIT �✓ OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY FOR RECLAMATION LAN N . 1, AND APPLICATION THEREFORE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR A SPECIFIC PLAN OF SITE USE AND DEVELOPMENT WITH THE CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY FOR RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, AND AUTHORIZING FILING OF AN APPLICATION THEREFORE WHEREAS, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California have owned and operated since 1923 a regional wastewater treatment plant to provide treatment and reuse or disposal of wastewater at its Reclamation Plant No. 1 in the City of Fountain Valley; and, WHEREAS, said Districts' operation of Reclamation Plant No. 1 is regulated by the provisions of both federal and California law; and, WHEREAS, said Districts have developed and adopted their collection treatment and disposal facilities Master Plan dated February 1989, which said Master Plan specifically includes all facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1; and, WHEREAS, City has asserted a right and made demand upon Districts to submit an application for zoning permit approval prior to commencement of construction of, any facilities at Plant No. 1; and, WHEREAS, said Districts have advised City that it is exempt from the requirement of compliance with local planning and zoning ordinances of the City; and, WHEREAS, a dispute has therefore arisen between City and Districts; and, WHEREAS, the parties hereto have determined that it is in the best "DD-1" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (1 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "DD-1" interest of each party to resolve this dispute regarding the legal rights and ` responsibilities of each party without expensive litigation by setting forth the ' agreement and understanding of the parties in a written agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Agreement dated August 12, 1992, for Specific Plan of Site Use and Development Between City of Fountain Valley and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, Regarding Sanitation Districts' Reclamation Plant No. 1, is hereby approved. Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. Section 3. That the General Manager, or his designee, is hereby authorized to prepare the requisite application for the Specific Plan and submit to the City of Fountain Valley in accordance with the terms of the above referenced agreement, upon receipt of said agreement fully approved and executed by the City of Fountain Valley and the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 12, 1992. "DD-2" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "DD-2" RESOLUTION NO. 92- CONFIRMING FEES, PROCEDURES AND POLICIES CONCERNING ANNEXATIONS OF TERRITORY TO THE �.� DISTRICT AS ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION N0. 91- - FOR 1992-93 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THAT ACREAGE ANNEXATION FEES HERETOFORE ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION NO. 91- - FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 SHALL REMAIN IN EFFECT THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1992-93 x x x x t x x x x x x x x x WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 91 _, the Board of Directors made certain findings and established a schedule of annexation acreage fees to be paid by the owners of all properties seeking to annex property to the District; and, WHEREAS, Resolution No. 91 _ provides that beginning July 1, 1991 and annually thereafter the annexation acreage fees are to be adjusted to reflect the increase in the Engineering News Record (ENR) construction cost index; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has determined that it is able to maintain the currently established annexation acreage fees without increase for the forthcoming fiscal year without impairing the financial status of the District. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the annexation acreage fees heretofore established by Resolution No. 91-__ effective July 1, 1991 through June 30, 1992 shall remain in effect for the period commencing July 1, 1992 through June 30, 1993. Section 2. All other provisions of Resolution No. 91- - shall remain in effect without amendment or modification. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 12, 1992. "EE" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (2) - .DISTRICTS 2,3,5,7911 "Er COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS . AI ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFOBNIA August 3, 1992 ` 1pBCG EWS AVENUE OO.BOX Bin Po NTgN VAUEV.CALIFORNIA 82MU0127 91.1 B82.241, STAFF REPORT PROPOSED AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE OF CAPACITY AND PAYMENT OF OPERATIONAL AND MAINTENANCE CHARGES RELATIVE TO SAN JOAQUIN HILLS PLANNED COMMUNITY AND REFUND OF CONNECTION FEE OVERPAYMENT DISTRICTS NOS. 5, 6 AND 14 Last year, Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) approached County Sanitation District No. 5 (CSD 5) regarding the San Joaquin Hills Planned Community (SJHPC) presently undergoing development by The Irvine Company. The SJHPC lies partly within CSD 5 and partially within County Sanitation District No. 14 (CSD 14) with an island between the boundaries of CSD 5 and CSD 14 in the middle of the SJHPC. This area was originally intended to be a part of CSD 14 but was inadvertently overlooked during the original formation of CSD 14. The annexation of this area to CSD 14 will be processed separately at a future date. The SJHPC development can best be served locally by IRWD wastewater collection facilities; however, there are no transmission facilities owned by either IRWD _ or CSD 14 which could deliver flows to IRWD's Michelson Drive Treatment Plant. Delivery to the Sanitation Districts' Joint Treatment and Disposal Facilities would require use of CSD 5 and CSD 6 sewer lines by CSD 14. If the proposed agreement is approved, IRWD's local collector system would deliver flows to the regional collection facilities of CSD 5 and CSD 6. In order to best accommodate flows from SJHPC, an agreement has been prepared (and approved by IRWD) which provides for CSD 14 to purchase between 4% and 5% (depending on the sewer reach) capacity in the CSD 5 and 6 trunk system and for CSD S, CSD 6 and CSD 14 to share in the operation and maintenance costs of the sewers. The estimated "buy-in" cost is $1,389,129.97. The "buy-in" cast to CSD 14 for existing facilities is $878,729.97, the payment of which will be divided between CSD 5 ($855,400.03) and CSD 6 ($23,340.94) based on their proportionate ownership of existing capacity. The balance of the payment will be similarly divided when the future facilities are completed, at which time CSD 14 will pay an estimated $518,300.00 to CSD 5 and $1,100.00 to CSD 6. Within the SJHPC, north of the CSD 5 boundary, is a portion of the "Downcoast Area" (i.e. , the gap between CSD 5 and 14 boundaries) for which IRWD paid connection fees as part of Annexation No. 7 to CSD 5. Included in the proposed agreement is a provision to refund to IRWD funds incorrectly paid to CSD 5 for connection fees on properties located outside of CSD 5. Connection fees for 509 residential units which are now planned to be built in SJHPC, within CSD 14, were paid to CSD 5 at the capital facilities charge of $1,500.00 per residential unit. Therefore the sum to be refunded by CSD 5 to IRWD is $763,500.00. "FF-1" AGENDA ITEM #28(b) - DISTRICTS 5, 6 8 14 "FF-1" Staff Report August 3, 1992 Page Two In summary, if the Directors approve the agreement, the following will occur with regards to the purchase and sale of capacity in the sewer facilities: CSD 14 will CSD 14 will CSD 5 will Item Pay CSD 5 Pay CSD 6 Pay IRWD Total For Completed Projects Payable within 60 Days $ 855.400.03 $23,340.94 $ 878,729.97 For Future Projects Payable following Completion 518,300.00 1,100.00 519,400.00 Subtotal Payable $1,373,700.03 $24,440.94 $1,398,129.97 Reimbursement of Connection Fees Payable by CSD 5 to IRWO (763,500.00) $763,500.00 Net Payable $ 610,200.03 $24.440.94 $763.500.00 $1,398,129.98 The agreement also provides for sharing of maintenance costs based on ownership capacity. Staff recommends approval. A copy of the proposed agreement is attached herewith. ENO/D14:SR1 "FF-2" AGENDA ITEM #28(b) - DISTRICTS 5, 6 & 14 "FF-2" AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE OF CAPACITY AND PAYMENT OF OPERATIONAL AND MAINTENANCE CHARGES RELATIVE lu SAN JOAQUIN ILL PLANNED COMMUNITY 1 THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into, to be effective this _ day of 1992, by and between: COUNTY SANITATION DI STRICT ISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, hereinafter referred to as "CSD 511 , and COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, hereinafter referred to as "CSD 6", and COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, hereinafter referred to as "CSD 14", and IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT, hereinafter referred to as "IRWD". R E C I T A L S: WHEREAS, CSD 5, CSD 6 and CSD 14 are duly organized County Sanitation Districts, existing pursuant to the County Sanitation District Act, California Health and Safety Code Sections 4700 et se . , providing for the ownership, operation and maintenance of wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities, individually and collectively, with County Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 7, 11 .and 13 (hereinafter "CSDOC") , pursuant to a Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement, effective July 1, 1985; and WHEREAS, property known as "San Joaquin Hills Planned Community" ("SJHPC") , presently undergoing development by The Irvine Company, lies partly within CSD 5 and partly within CSD 14 as shown in Exhibit A which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and "FF-3" AGENDA ITEM #28(b) - DISTRICTS 5, 6 8 14 "FF-3" WHEREAS, the territory comprising SJHPC will most efficiently be served by local IRWD wastewater collection facilities which, in turn, deliver flow to the regional collector facilities of CSD 5 and CSD 6; and WHEREAS, IRWD is organized and existing pursuant to the California Water District Act, California Water Code, Sections 34000, et seq. , and also owns, operates and maintains wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities pursuant to powers granted by such Act; and WHEREAS, CSD 14 has entered into agreements with the other County Sanitation Districts comprising CSDOC for the purchase and sale of capacity rights in treatment, disposal and sewer facilities of CSDOC, and to fund, from time to time, as necessary, CSD 14's share of the CSDOC budget for capital expenditures and operation and maintenance costs relative to CSDOC joint wastewater treatment works, including the costs attributable to wastewater flows `..� generated by the CSD 14 portion of SJHPC, as further described in said agreements; and WHEREAS, CSD 5 and CSD 6 operate a system of wastewater collection facilities that have sufficient capacity to accommodate CSD 14 portion of SJHPC flows; and WHEREAS, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Resolution No. 82-42, Establishing Policy Re Purchase and Sale of Inter-District Collection System Capacities allows transportation of wastewater originating in one District through the facilities of another District by jointly sharing the cost of construction and/or acquiring inter-District capacity rights in such facilities; and "FF-4" AGENDA ITEM #28(b)_ - DISTRICTS 5, 6 & 14 "FF-4" WHEREAS, CSD 14 desires to purchase and use sufficient CSD 5 and CSD 6 capacity and CSD 5 and CSD 6 desire to sell such capacity to CSD 14 and allow CSD 14 to convey flows from CSD 14 portion of SJHPC through CSD 5 and CSD 6 �.✓ regional collector facilities into CSDOC joint treatment works; and WHEREAS, a portion of SJHPC, north of the CSD 5 boundary (labeled AREA 1 on Exhibit A) , was included in the "Downcoast Area° for which IRWD paid facilities construction casts and basic connection charges to CSD 5 pursuant to an agreement entitled "Agreement between Irvine Ranch Water District and County Sanitation District No. 5 Providing for Funding and Construction of Sewer Facilities to Serve the Downcoast Area", dated March 9, 1988 (the Downcoast Agreement) , and IRWD should receive a refund for connection fees paid for Area 1. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL PROMISES SET FORTH HEREIN, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Purchase Subject to the satisfaction of payment obligations set forth in this Section 1, CSD 5 and CSD 6 hereby convey, and CSD 14 hereby purchases capacity in the various reaches of CSD 5 and CSD 6 Regional Collector Trunk Sewers as delineated in Exhibit B, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The amount of $878,729.97 shall be due and payable within sixty (60) days. This amount represents only the completed portions of CSD 5 and CSD 6 trunk sewers. This amount is to be divided as follows: CSD 5 will receive $855,400.04 and CSD 6 will receive $23,340.94. It is expressly understood that the following CSD 5 and CSD 6 projects, which will also provide "FF-5" AGENDA ITEM #28(b) - DISTRICTS 5, 6 8 14 "FF-5" capacity to service SJHPC, are either currently under construction or being designed and will not be completed prior to execution of this agreement. Estimated Estimated Project Final Cost CSD 14 Cost Bay Bridge Pump Station Improvements, Contract No. 5-33 $1,750,000 $ 66,800 Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-34-3 3,300,000 431,500 Modifications to Districts 5 and 6 Siphon and Santa Ana River Siphon at Plant No. 2, Contract No. 5-39 1,200,000 21.100 Totals $6,250,000 $519,400 r Within sixty (60) days following the filing of a notice of completion for each of the aforementioned projects, CSD 14 shall purchase capacity and CSD 5 and CSD 6 shall convey capacity to CSD 14 therein with the price to be based on the percent of capacity ownership to final construction costs per project per the formula described in Exhibit B. The funds shall be distributed between CSD 5 and CSD 6 based on their corresponding percentage of construction costs paid. Section 2: Operation and Maintenance CSD 14 shall be responsible for its proportionate share of operation and maintenance expenses for the operation and maintenance of the reaches of the West Coast Highway and Sayside Trunk Sewer systems. Operation and maintenance expenses will be shared by CSD 5, CSD 6 and CSD 14 based on their proportionate share of capacity. "FF-6" AGENDA ITEM #28(b) - DISTRICTS 5, 6 & 14 "FF-6" Section 3: Funding , CSD 5 hereby agrees to refund to IRWD a portion of the connection fees previously paid to CSD 5 under the Downcoast Agreement, representing Area 1's share of said connection fees. The amount of $763,500.00 shall be made due and ` payable to IRWD by CSD 5, within sixty (60) days after execution of this agreement. The sum of $763,500.00 is equivalent to CSD 5 basic capital facilities charge of $1,500.00 for each residential unit, per the Downcoast Agreement, times 509 residential units, per Exhibit C, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The 509 residential units shall be deducted from the 3,400 residential units paid for under the Downcoast Agreement. Section 4: Entire Agreement This instrument contains the entire agreement between the parties relating to the rights herein granted and the obligations herein assumed. Any prior `...� agreements or representations not expressly set forth herein are of no force and effect. "FF-7" AGENDA ITEM #28(b) - DISTRICTS 5, 6 8 14 "FF-7" • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. RECOMMENDED: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By: � � {.�r/7 By: erector Of Engineering Chairman By: O By: Oir for of Finance Secretary COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By: Chai man By: Secretary COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Chairman CSDOC al ounsel By: By: Secretary IRVINE RANCH ER D ICT� APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: V1Ce President IRWD Legal ..,c,p/unseI By: aiG /JGU.�/i By: re ry ENGID :agrwnt \r� "FF-8" AGENDA ITEM #28(b) - DISTRICTS 5, 6 & 14 "FF-8" BOrrT OR LEGEND: �p •or•�u. �RY U V14 IEWPORT BEACH O(TY LMf3 ■00 00 m TENT.TR. 13455 DISTRICT (SAN-KX%Q J HLL.S) 14 BAN . IN M CA vo 9qN,p�N -AREA 4 fts DISiRIOr 5 N FLOW ACCOMMODATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN DISTRICTS 5,61£14 REGARDING SAN JOAQUIN HILLS DEVELOPMENT. "FF-9" AGENDA ITEM #28(b) - DISTRICTS 5, 6 & 14 "FF-9" E` YIL1� A T T \\ I C:) PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS,OISF. No. T O PROTECTS FOR SAN JOAQUIN HILLS PLANNED COMMUMTY Job No. Till. Final Cont.Amt.sod Comp"m Average Cost per Capacity Used by ]]$24,802�56 In Dote Amt.Faster III Cepedly ICFSI CFS 42) CSDI41CFS) IFI 13) 5.34-2 IMPROVEMENTS TO BAYSIDE DRIVE 02.377,465.00 1.000 7.80 $304,001.92 1.02 7.96 TRUNK SEWER 13 Mer-91 5.22 BAYSIDE DRIVE TRUNK SEWER AND $51 a.128.00 1.344 7.80 $89,277.44 1.02 3.00 WATER MAIN ST.AND DRAINAGE 14-Jan81 IMPROVEMENTS 151 Cm 6.12 COAST HIGHWAY TRUNK SEWER $171,599.66 5.476 18.26 $51,464.10 1.02 0.33 AND BAY BRIDGE PUMPING STATION 10-Apr86 n 461 518R REHABILITATION AND RELOCATION $862.060.35 1.169 18.26 454,669.54 1.02 2.93 m OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY SEWER 15 Mot-e4 3 FROM BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION TO DOVER DRIVE N OD 5122 REHABILITATION OF PACIFIC COAST 0412,50e.14 1.202 8.13 054,306.30 .61 7.23 Q HIGHWAY TRUNK SEWER FROM 13 Apt-83 DOVER DR.TO ROCKY POINT PUMP I STATION C7 5 29 REPLACEMENT OF PORTIONS OF 01.100,009.50 1.055 9.13 $127.109.52 .51 5.59 COAST HIGHWAY FORCE MAIN AND 18-Ap,.89 to GRAVITY SEWER IS) -I A 5-BR SLIP-LINING OF TRUNK G.UNIT 6, $216.114.00 1.780 7.91 $48,632-48 .51 2.66ROCKY POINT TO LIDO PUMP 30 Sap-78 STATIONS(4) 526 PORTION OF REPLACED LIDO FORCE 0494.100.00 1.112 24.775 $21.728.32 .61 1.44 MAIN 14 O.,87 T (5) p° 5 19 R3 REPLACEMENT OF PORTIONS OF'B' $831.263.32 1.112 21.180 $43,643.29 .51 $22.250.08 F-� TRUNK SEWER BITTER POINT PUMP 14-Oct-87 r STATION TO THE VALVE 44) 5 31 REPLACEMENT OF PORTIONS OF 01,655,111.00 1.055 24.775 470,480.00 .61 $36.944.80 COAST HIGHWAY FORCE MAIN 141 5-May-a9 5 25 MODIFICATIONS TO PACIFIC COAST $133,462.00 1.234 24.775 $6,647.51 .51 $3.390.23 HIGHWAY 141 5.29 REPLACEMENT OF PORTIONS OF 05.494,258.00 1.056 21.180 8273,876.17 .51 $139.574.34 COAST HIGHWAY FORCE MAIN AND 18 Apr-89 T GRAVITY SEWER 14) IS) T 1 o EXHIBIT B Page 1 of 2 T T PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS,DISF. No. J PROJECTS FOR UN JOAQUIN HILLS PUNNED COMMUMTY Job No. Title Final Cont. Compound Awuae Cost per Capacity Used by 'Buy In' Amt.and Data Amt.Factor III Capacity ICFSI CFS 121 CS014(CPS) by CSD1416)131 519-112 REPLACEMENT OF PORTIONS $834.206.21 1.117 21.100 $33.447.04 .51 $17.067.99 OF 'e'TRUNK SEWER BITTER 9ApreB POINT PUMP STATION TO EAST OF SANTA ANA RIVER JUNCTION STRUCTURE 141 3a 5-19 R1 REPAIR OF PORTION OF SEWER $126,856.82 1.118 24.776 $5.724.56 .51 $2.919.53 sn TRUNK B 141 13 Feb-86 m z C 5-21 SANTA ANA RIVER BIPNON 141 {37],990.11 1.673 24.776 {25,251.33 .61 {12,879.10 1. Oct.79 --A 621.1 CONSTRUCTION OF*A*AND {220,625.00 1.344 24.775 $11,932.90 .61 $6,085.78 M '9'TRUNK SEWER FACILITIES 10Jun at 3 141 161 zlic N {878,729.97 00 Cr " 111 NOTE: Compound Armum based on ENR coat IMex Im LA IJuly 16. 1891-18671 and 4°b average coat increases 41987-19631 121 Cost Per CFS = IFlnal Cont.Amt.x Compound Amt.Fe<torllAverapa Capacity ICFSI C UJ 131 'Buy In'by CSD 14 hit a (Con Par CFS x Capacity Used by CSD 141 � 191 Systems to share'Buy In'and 08M costs with District No.8 f7 � I51 Adjustment to Contract emauM deleting PoNone of work not iHeud. CT) W I--r F TI EXHIBIT B Page 2 of 2 T FLOW QUANTITY CALCULATIONS FROM SAN JOAQUIN HILLS PLAN COMMUNITY TRACT NO. 13455 DEVELOPMENT INTO DISTRICT NUMBER 5 LOT LAND USE ACRES GPD/ACRE GPD AREA 1 DO 1 MEDIUM 15.4 3880 59,752.00 N/A 2 MEDIUM-HIGH 13 .6 5580 75,888.00 N/A C PARR 08.7 200 1,740.00 N/A D PARR 05.7 200 1,140.00 N/A 3 MEDIUM-HIGH 13.0 5580 72 ,540.00 N/A 4 MEDIUM-HIGH 12.7 5580 70,866. 00 N/A 5 MEDIUM-HIGH 19.7 5580 109,926.00 72 6 MEDIUM-HIGH 07.4 5580 41, 292.00 104 8 HIGH 13 .7 7945 108 ,846.50 177 9 HIGH 08.4 7945 1 66,738. 00 126 10 PARK 15.2 200 3 , 040.00 N/A 16 PARK 07. 9 200 1,580.00 N/A 19 MEDIUM 14.0 3380 47,320. 00 30 TOTALS 156. 10 660, 668.50 509 F: \WPDOC\NGUYEN\SJH-PLAN 660,668.50 GPD(lc£/7.48gal.) *(lday/24hr. ) *(1hr/60min) *(lmin/60sec) =1.02cfs 509 DU($1, 500/DU) _ $763, 500 EXHIBIT C "FF-12" AGENDA ITEM #28(b) - DISTRICTS 5, 6 & 14 "FF-12" RESOLUTION NO. 92-125 APPROVING AGREEMENTAMONG DISTRICTS NOS. 5, 6 AND 14 AND -IRWD RE OWNERSHIP, OPERATIONS AND l / MAINTENANCE IN CERTAIN TRUNK SEWER FACILITIES; �s✓ AND PROVIDING FOR REIMBURSEMENT TO IRWO OF OVERPAYMENT OF CONNECTION CHARGES ALL RELATIVE TO SAN JOAQUIN HILLS PLANNED COMMUNI A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 5, 6 & 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT AMONG THE DISTRICTS AND IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT FOR THE PURCHASE AND SALE OF CAPACITY IN CERTAIN SEWER TRANSMISSION FACILITIES, THE PAYMENT OF ON-GOING OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE CHARGES FOR SAID FACILITIES; AND PROVIDING FOR THE REIMBURSEMENT BY DISTRICT NO. 5 TO IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT OF OVERPAYMENT OF CONNECTION CHARGES ALL RELATIVE TO SAN JOAQUIN HILLS PLANNED COMMUNITY WHEREAS, certain property known as the San Joaquin Hills Planned Community, presently being developed by the Irvine Company as owner, lies partly within the ,jurisdictional boundaries of County Sanitation Districts No. 5 and Partly within the ,jurisdictional boundaries of County Sanitation District No. 14; and, WHEREAS, the territory comprising the San Joaquin Hills Planned Community would be most effectively served by Irvine Ranch Water District owned local wastewater collection facilities which are connected to the regional facilities of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6; and, WHEREAS, the San Joaquin Hills Planned Community will ultimately be entirely within the boundaries of County Sanitation District No. 14; and, WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. 14 wishes to acquire by purchase, sufficient capacity in trunk sewer facilities owned by County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6 to accommodate flows originating in San Joaquin Hills Planned Community; and, "GG-1" AGENDA ITEM #28(c) - DISTRICTS 5, 6 8 14 "GG-1" WHEREAS, a portion of the San Joaquin Hills Planned Community is located outside of the boundaries of County Sanitation District No. 5 but Irvine Ranch Water District paid facility construction costs in the form of connection fees to County Sanitation District No. 5, for which a refund of said connection fees should now be paid. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of. County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5, 6 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That certain agreement dated August 12, 1992, for Purchase of Capacity and Payment of Operational and Maintenance Charges Relative to San Joaquin Hills Planned Community, by and among Districts Nos. 5, 6 and 14 and the Irvine Ranch Water District, is hereby approved; and, Section 2. That the Chairmen and Secretary of District Nos. 5, 6 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreement In form approved by the General Counsel. �.,.i PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 12, 1992. "GG-2" AGENDA ITEM #28(c) - DISTRICTS 5, 6 8 14 "GG-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 39 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON JULY 89 1992 PN(TATfoA, . 9 polilon O' GIs 0 N `Z oggkce coo ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA u ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11. 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on July 8. 1992, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts- Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: z Dan Griset, Chairman Robert Richardson %Fred Barrera, Chairman pro tem —Gene Beyer xThomas R. S.Itarelll —Leslie A. Pontious x Roger Stanton —Don R. Roth 7--James A. Wahner _James Ferryman DISTRICT N0. 2: z Henry W. Medae, Chairman John M. Gullixson z John Collins, Chairman pro tem —George Scott z Fred Barrera —_Gene Beyer z Buck Catlin Chris Norby -7-Barry Denes —Bob Bell 7—William D. Mahoney —James H. Flora Robert H. Main _No man Culver z Carrey J. Nelson —Glenn Parker 7--Arthur G. Newton —John 0. Tynes x Iry Pickier —Fred Hunter Miguel Pulida x Dan Griset x Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 3: x Sal A. Sapien, Chai man Harry M. Dotson z Burnie Dunlap, Chairman pro tem —Carrey J. Nelson z Buck Catlin —Chris Norby z John Collins —_George Scott z Norman Culver Robert H. Main x James V. Evans —Margie L. Rice z James H. Flora —William 0. Mahoney z Don R. Griffin —Rhonda J. McCune z Frank Laszlo —Gwen A. Forsythe x Pat McGuigan —_Robert Richardson %Eva G. Miner Larry Herman z Richard Partin —Cecilia L. Age z Iry Pickier —Fred Hunter x Jim Silva Earle Robitaille x Roger Stanton —Don R. Roth 7—Charles Sylvia _Ronald Bates DISTRICT NO. 5: z Ruthelyn Plummer, Chai man _Evelyn Hart x Phil Sansone, Chai mean pro tem John C. Cox, Jr. _Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 6: x James A. Wahner, Chairman Dick Sherrick x Evelyn Hart, Chairman pro tem —Ruthelyn Plummer _Don R. Roth =Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 7: x Charles E. Puckett, Chairman Thomas R. Saltarelli x James A. Wahner, Chairman pro tem —Nate Reade x Fred Barrera —_Gene Beyer a John C. Cox, Jr. Ruthelyn Plummer x Robert Richardson —Miguel Pulido Don R. Roth x Roger Stanton x Sally Anne Sheridan _Barry Hammond DISTRICT NO. 11: x Grace Winchell, Chairman Linda Moulton-Patterson x Jack Kelly, Chairman pro tens —Don MacAllister x Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth - DISTRICT NO. 13: John M. Gullixson, Chairman x Henry W. Wedaa z Fred Barrera, Chai man pro tem Gene Beyer a William D. Earle —Fred Hunter —Glenn Parker xBurnie Dunlap _Don R. Roth x Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chairman _Darryl Miller x Leslie A. Pontious, Chairman pro tens Charles E. Puckett x Fred Barrera —Gene Beyer Don R. Roth xRoger Stanton x Sally Anne Sheridan _Barry Hammond -2- 07/08/92 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita Brown, Board Secretary, Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle, Corrine Clawson, Mark Esquer, Patti Gorczyca, Gary Hasenstab, John Linder, Margie Mellor, Mary Simpson, Ed Torres, Jack Vincent OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel ,. Jamel Demir, Bill Knopf, Mary Lee, Ed Snell , Phil Stone, Richard von Langen x x x x x x x x x x x x x ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Mahoney reported that Report of the Joint Chairman the Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Computerization was scheduled to meet on Thursday, July 16th, at 5:30 p.m. He also reported that the Joint Works Selection Committee would meet on Wednesday, July 29th, at 4:30 p.m., immediately preceding the Executive Committee. Chairman Mahoney then announced that the Executive Committee and Fiscal Policy Committee would meet jointly on Wednesday, July 29th, at 5.30 p.m. He further stated that due to a League of Cities meeting conflict the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee had been rescheduled to meet on Tuesday, July 28th, at 5:30 p.m. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that the Report of the General Manager recent earthquake caused no major problems at the treatment plants. Power was lost at some of the pump stations, but the emergency power generators for those stations kicked-in as designed. Mr. Sylvester announced that Standard 8 Poor's had upgraded the Districts' bond rating by two points, from A to AA-. This is a major upgrade that should save the Districts considerable monies in interest costs over the life of the Districts' Certificates of Participation issues. The General Manager further reported that AB 3214, the proposal that would transfer $347 million state-wide from enterprise special districts to school districts, has unofficially been removed from the Governors state budget proposal . This proposal would have eliminated the Districts $35.1 million annual property tax revenue. Mr. Sylvester cautioned, however, that it was necessary to keep the the pressure on the Governor and state legislators because anything could happen as they try to solve the state's budget , crisis. 1 -3- fir✓ 07/08/92 ALL DISTRICTS This being the annual meeting fixed by Annual Electiono oint Chairman the Boards of Directors for the election of the Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization, the Secretary stated that William D. Mahoney had been nominated at the regular meeting of the Joint Boards on June 10, 1992, in accordance with established procedures. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director William D. Mahoney as Joint Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. ALL DISTRICTS This being the annual meeting fixed by Annua Election of Vice.Joint the Boards of Directors for the Chairman election of the Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization, nominations were then called for the post of Vice Joint Chairman, whereupon Evelyn Hart was nominated. There being no other nominations, the vote was then polled, and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Evelyn Hart as Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 10, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 10, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 10, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 10, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 10, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 10, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -4- 07/08/92 DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes - amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 10, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or pproval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 10, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting- held June 10, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Join and ndiv ual District laims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 6/03/92 6117/92 ALL DISTRICTS Joint operating Fund - $ 412,369.43 $ 800,590.70 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 3,195,676.02 2,358,082.96 Joint Working Capital Fund - 169,280.34 209,481.05 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 10,250.96 104,118.97 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 1,853.87 1,250.82 Rb 9TR T—N6-2 - 15,697.36 16,519.68 UrPUCI T-RO-75 - 310,026.03 19,624.00 DI TROT N—. $ - 588,688.67 18,458.88 DIDI TRI�077 - 175.03 158.42 D TRIM T—NM.77 - 194,242.92 37,493.22 DI TRI —NT. 1 - 1,904.65 7,605.02 DI FTIRI T N T.717 - 21.16 47.65 DI TRIG.N6 14 - 20,675.22 17,997.97 D RISC SrNOS15 & 6 JOINT - 2,095.65 59.51 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 27.19 2,935.41 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 6 474.80 86.33 4, .30 ,5 4,51 .5 -5- 07/08/92 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing and directing execution and filingof documents necessar That the following resolutions for Federal and State rants for authorizing and directing execution the 1992-93 Joint Works and filing of documents necessary for Improvements and Additions Federal and State Clean Water Grants and Loans under 33 U.S.C. , 1251 at seq. ; Chapters 12.5, 13. 14 and 15; and Division 7 of the California Water ° Code, and providing certain assurances in connection with the 1992-93 Joint Works Improvements and Additions, be, and are hereby, adopted by the respective Boards of Directors: District No. Resolution No. 1 92-74-1 2 92-75-2 3 92-76-3 5 92-77-5 6 92-78-6 7 92-79-7 11 92-80-11 13 92-81-13 14 92-82-14 Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue a urchase order to outh oast Air That staff be, and is hereby, ual ity Management District for authorized to issue a purchase order fTa ent of various fees duringto South Coast Air Quality Management i a year 199Z-93 District in an amount not to exceed $350,000.00 for payment of various fees required by SCAQMD regulations, payable during fiscal year 1992-93, estimated as follows: Type of Fee Amount Annual Emissions $113,000 Annual Operating Permit 89,000 and Permit Evaluation Source Testing and 75,000 Analysis Nonattainment Pollutants, 30,000 Precursors and Toxics Miscellaneous 43,D00 TOTAL $350,000 �,/ -6- 07/08/92 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 11 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 11 to the plans Job No. J-19-1 and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, authorizing an addition of $38,710.00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation for seven items of additional work, be, and is hereby, o approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 14 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 14 to the plans Job No. J-19-2 and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-19-2, authorizing a net addition of $32,062.09 to the contract with Brinderson Corporation for 13 items of added or deleted work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 7 to the plans antl specifications for That Change Order No. 7 to the plans Job No. J-23-1 and specifications for Control Center/Operations and Maintenance Building, Job No. J-23-1, authorizing an addition of $12,870.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for three items of additional work, and granting a time extension of ten calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 11 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 11 to the plans Job Nos. P1-34-3, P1-35-2 and J-21 and specifications for Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-3; Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-2; and Installation of Waste Digester Gas Flare Facilities at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-21, authorizing an addition of $20,347.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. , for four items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 4 to the plans No. P2-42-1 and specifications for Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P242-1, authorizing a net addition of $1,006.00 to the contract with Ziebarth 8 Alper and C. S. Alper Construction , Co. , Inc. for six items of added or deleted work, be, and is hereby, approved. -7- 07/08/92 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate That the Staff Report dated June 29, a Professional 5ervices Agreement 1992, be, and is hereby, received and • for study, design and construction ordered filed; and, support services for Job Nos. Pi-38-b and P2-46 FURTHER MOVED: That the Selection Committee be, and is hereby, authorized to solicit proposals and negotiate a Professional Services Agreement for study, design and construction support services required for Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-5, and Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-46, for consideration by the Boards at a future meeting. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison Company That the Boards of Directors hereby for right-of-way re Job No. J-23-1 adopt Resolution No. 92-83, approving and authorizing execution of a Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison Company for right-of-way required to operate and maintain Southern California Edison's equipment which will provide electrical power to the new Control Center/Operations and \� Maintenance Building, Job No. J-23-1. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written re orts of the Fiscal Polic That the written reports of the ommittee and Execu ive omm ttee Fiscal Policy Committee and Executive Committee meetings held on June 17, 1992 and June 24, 1992, respectively, be, and are hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. -8- 07/08/92 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizin staff to lace - lsk Pro ert nsurance That staff be, and is hereby, including earth uake an food authorized to place the following Boiler and Machinery and Fai hful All-Risk Property Insurance, �••G Performance insurance coverages including earthquake and flood, Boiler and Machinery and Faithful Performance insurance coverages, as recommended by the Districts' broker, Robert F. Driver Associates: POLICY COMPANY COVERAGE SUMMARY TERM a PREMIUM All Risk Including Layered with $200,000,000 All Risk 7/12/92-7/12/93 $647,340* Earthquake 8 Flood 15 companies $10D,000,000 Earthquake 7/12/93-3/01/94 $411,778*/** (See Broker's $ 20,000,000 Deductible Cap Recommendation) Boiler 6 Machinery Kemper Insurance $100,000,000/Occurrence 7/12/92-7/12/93 $ 77.496 Group $ 100,000 Major Deductible 7/12/93-3/01/94 $ 49,287** $ 25,000 Deductible A71 Other Objects Excess worker's General Reinsurance $ 10,000,000 Worker's Compensation 7/01/92-7/01/93 $ 36,775 Compensation— and 1,000,000 Employer's Liability 7/01193-3/01/94 $ 24,492** Fireman's Fund Maximum any one loss _. (Increases to Statutory) V.r Faithful Performance Hartford Insurance $ 2,000,000 8/15/92-e/15/93 $ 3,700 Employee Dishonesty Company 2,500 Deductible 8/15/93-3/01/94 $ 2,005** -Includes taxes and fees *-May be subject to increase upon renewal depending on market conditions and loss axparience. ***Boards authorized placement effective 7/1/92 at 6/12/92 meeting FURTHER MOVED: That extension of coverages for All-Risk Property Insurance, Boiler and Machinery, Excess Workers' Compensation and Faithful Performance insurance from the 1993 renewal dates to March 3, 1994, be, and is hereby, authorized in order to take advantage of lower insurance demands. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. -9- 07/08/92 DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 6 7 8 11 Actions re a tal Im rovement Program, 1 Series C Certificates of Participation 811r2v2g Ca ital Im rovement Moved, seconded and duly carried Pro ram 199 - ertes by each respective District: Certificates of Participation issue That its Board of Directors hereby adopts the following resolution approving Capital Improvement Program, 1990-92 Series C Certificates of Participation Issue, pursuant to the Boards' adopted long-range financial plan: DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. COP MAXIMUM AMOUNT 1 92-84-1 $10,000,000 2 92-85-2 27,500,000 3 92-86-3 33,500,000 6 92-87-6 7,000,000 7 92-88-7 7,500,000 11 92-89-11 13,000,000 Said resolutions authorize issuance of Certificates of Participation by each respective District in the principal amounts indicated above and aggregate principal amount not to exceed $98,500,000; and: - Approve and authorize printing and distribution of the Preliminary and Final Official Statement (informs potential investors about terms) - Authorize payment to the credit rating agencies, Standard and Poors and Moody's (estimated amount $30,000.00 each) - Authorize completion of the following legal documents: *Trust Agreement.............Instructions for Trustee Bank *Acquisition Agreement.......Details each District's participation and projects *Assignment Agreement........Allows the transfer of installment payments to Trustee *Certificate of Purchase.....Sets forth terms and conditions of sale between Districts and underwriter Merrill Lynch -10- 07/08/92 - Authorize execution and delivery of traditional variable rate or synthetic fixed/variable rate COPS, subsequent to the negotiation process, with final terms to be determined by finance team, but not to exceed $98.5 million and a term of 30 years - Authorize investment of proceeds - Authorize Merrill Lynch underwriters' fees not to exceed $5.50/$1,000 certificate for variable rate transaction or $9.50/$1,000 certificate for fixed or synthetic variable rate transaction - Authorize selection of Trustee Bank - State Street Bank and Trust Company (Estimated fee: One-time fee of $9,000-$13,000 plus $4,000-$5,500 annual fee) - Authorize purchase of municipal bond credit enhancement, if deemed appropriate or necessary by the finance team, to improve Districts' credit rating for all or a portion of the issue, or to replace reserve requirements (to be determined at time of sale) - Approve Master Interest Exchange (SWAP) Agreements if and when deemed appropriate by the finance team. Interest rate exchange agreements between the - Districts, the underwriter Merrill Lynch and counter party authorize a SWAP if fixed interest for �...� variable interest under specified terms, if and when appropriate, to maximize interest earnings. Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. Authorizin finance team to Moved, seconded and duly carried: determine and implement the est combination of financing alterna- That the finance team be, and is tives to obtain the most favorable hereby, authorized to determine overall terms and conditions for and implement the best the Capital Improvement Program combination of the debt financing 1990-92, Series C Certificates of alternatives to obtain the most Participation Issue favorable overall terms and conditions for the Capital Improvement Program 1990-92, Series C Certificates of Participation Issue based on the market conditions during the transaction time frame; and, -11- �v✓ 07/08/92 FURTHER MOVED: That each District Chairman or Chairman pro tem, Board Secretary, General Manager, Director of Finance, General Counsel and any other duly-constituted officer or agent be, and are hereby, authorized to execute any and all documents necessary and advisable to �.✓ effectuate the transactions. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. DISTRICTS 1 2 6 3 Ac tans re restructuring of the 1986 COP issue to take advantage of considerable advances in municipal securities market financing techniques since 1986 A Min Letter A reement with Moved, seconded and duly carried: Pa nRibber for underwriting services That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-90, approving Letter Agreement with PaineWebber, dated June 30, 1992, for underwriting services, for an amount not to exceed $8.50 per $1,000 certificate, for a fixed-rate restructuring, or $3.50 per $1,000 certificate for a synthetic fixed-rate restructuring, subject to final approval of the restructuring by the Boards. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this Item be made a matter of record. A rovin Lette r rie A re ement with Moved, seconded and duly carried: Mudge Rose Gu h A exander and Ferdon for special Co-Bond Counsel That the Boards of Directors services hereby adapt Resolution No. 92-91, approving Letter Agreement with Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander and Ferdon, dated June 18, 1992, for special Co-Bond Counsel services, based on per diem rates, for an amount not to exceed $80,000 for a fixed-rate issue, plus an amount not to exceed $30,000 for the additional synthetic fixed-rate work plus expenses, subject to final approval of the restructuring by the Boards. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. Approving Memorandum Agreement with Moved, seconded and duly carried: Rourke 8 Woodruff for s ecial Co-Bond Counsel se ry ces That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-92, approving Memorandum Agreement with Rourke 8 Woodruff, dated June 30, 1992, for special Co-Bond Counsel services, for a maximum fee not to exceed $15,000.00, subject to final approval of the restructuring by the Boards. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on �l this item be made a matter of record. -12- 07/08/92 Authorizing the engagement of Moved, seconded and duly carried: Orrick Herrington as underwriters' counsel That the engagement of Orrick Herrington as underwriters' counsel , and providing for the cost of said services to be included in the cost of issuance paid to PaineWebber, subject to final approval of the restructuring by the Boards, be, and is hereby, approved. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re proposed fiscal year 1992-93 budgets Staff Report on 1992-93 Budgets The Director of Finance reviewed the 1992-93 budget recommendations for the individual Districts which incorporate each District's share of the Joint Works operating and capital budgets approved by the Boards on June loth. The budgets of the nine separate Districts, prepared pursuant to the adopted Financial Plan for the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, total $538.2 million. The net budget decrease from the 1991-92 budget is $54.2 million, or 9.1%, including reserve requirements. Approximately 11% of the budgeted requirements is for operations, maintenance and replacement (0,M 8 R) and 7% for debt. Capital funds (including reserves) for construction of master planned sewerage facilities for both the individual District's collection systems and the joint treatment plants account for 41%; and authorized general , �...� contingency and other reserves are nearly 41% of the total budget. Funding of the budget for 1992-93 is provided primarily by accumulated construction and other reserves, accounting for 57% of the total. In addition, taxes contribute 6%, fees (connection fees and user fees) 15%, and interest and miscellaneous income 4%. Projected borrowing to partially fund the current and future capital requirements in accordance with the Master Plan will provide 18% of the total revenue for 1992-93. Except for Districts 13 and 14, which receive no ad valorem taxes, the property tax appropriations received pursuant to Proposition 13 by the other Districts are fully allocated to the Operating Funds to cover debt service for Certificates of Participation (COPS) in accordance with the federally required Revenue Program and Board policy. Districts 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 have adopted user fee programs to provide necessary supplemental financing of Districts' 0, M 8 R as the costs of wastewater treatment and disposal activities required by federal , state and local regulatory authorities have exceeded the ability of the ad valorem tax revenues to fund operations under Proposition 13 constraints. District No. 13 receives no appropriation from ad valorem taxes and is totally financed by fees. District No. 14 is financed by the Irvine Ranch Water District. -13- 07/08/92 Mr. Streed pointed out that fee rates for 1992-93 have been adopted by the Boards pursuant to recommendations made by staff, the Fiscal Policy Committee and the .Executive Committee, equal to the rates for 1991-92. Staff also painted out that should the state adopt pending AB 3214, which is proposed to redirect property tax away from special enterprise districts, like the Sanitation Districts, to the schools, the user fee rates will need to be increased to make up for the loss of up to $34.2 million of property taxes for 1992-93. This would result in fee adjustments of between 37% to 142% for the individual Districts. He also reported that the Districts were continuing to lobby against the Governor's tax shift proposal , but that If it passes, it may be necessary to convene the Boards in special session to implement rate increases. The Districts currently treat 225 million gallons per day (MGD) of wastewater of which 135 MGD (60 MGD now in service at Plant No. 1 and 75 MGD now in service at Plant No. 2) is secondary treatment. The budget projections assume renewal of the Districts' 301(h) NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit now being reviewed by the EPA and CRWQCB. Should full secondary treatment be required, the capital and 0, M 8 R costs would Increase substantially. EPA and SWRCB have previously funded up to 87WA of the cost of construction of advanced treatment facilities, but Congress has eliminated the construction grant program and replaced it with a revolving loan program. Thus, virtually all future treatment plant improvements will be a local responsibility. The real long-term impact of federal and state requirements on Districts' fiscal planning will be on 0, M 8 R costs. While Mr. Streed noted that the EPA and SWRCB have funded a portion of constructing facilities for a higher degree of treatment in the past, the added ongoing operating costs have always been paid entirely by the local community. Under full secondary treatment, estimated 0, M 8 R costs would increase another $50 million annually (based on 1989 dollars). The Joint Operating budget, approved June loth, decreased by $1.4 million in large part due to savings from the new central. power generation facilities. Once these savings are fully realized, operating costs will continue to rise due to inflationary influences, rising flows, increased costs of sludge disposal and other regulatory requirements imposed by such authorities as the EPA, RWQCB and South Coast Air Quality Management District. Capital financing for sewers and treatment and disposal facilities will be provided by accumulated construction reserves and interest earnings thereon, connection and capital replacement fees, sales of capacity rights and borrowing. User fees are also a potential source of funding a portion of capital needs for rehabilitation, replacement and treatment improvements, and are a partial source of funds for debt repayment as well as 0, M 8 R. -14- 07/08/92 The Director of Finance also reviewed the 10-year fiscal projections and pointed out that the Districts' 0, M 8 R, capital and debt service needs overthe next ten years total $2.2 billion. It is clear that the Districts will have to utilize a combination of increased user and connection fees and debt financing to maintain their fiscal integrity and to keep pace with the rising costs of sewage collection, treatment and disposal and increasingly stringent public health and environmental protection standards. The proposed budgets indicate potential average annual user fee increases of $10-$15 per year for the next 10 years. Mr. Streed pointed out that changes to user fees are reviewed by the Directors each year and that these projections are very preliminary because of the many factors that affect the fee structure. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 1992-93 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1992-93 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 18,028,000 Capital Facilities Fund 21,675,000 Construction Fund - 1986 2,633,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 12.688,000 TOTAL $ 55,024,000 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 9 - fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1992-93 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 56,454,000 Capital Facilities Fund 83,257,000 Construction Fund - 1986 4,723,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 31,319,000 TOTAL $175,753,000 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and unanimously 8provIng 1 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1992-93 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: , Operating Fund $ 68,075,000 Capital Facilities Fund 83,310,000 Construction Fund - 1986 5,117,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 35,733,000 TOTAL $192,235,000 -15- 07/08/92 DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and unanimously _pproving 1992-93 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's- 1992-93 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: - Operating Fund $ 14,612,000 Capital Facilities Fund 13,161,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 9,147,000 TOTAL $ 36,920,000 DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 1992-93 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1992-93 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 11,730,000 Capital Facilities Fund 11,701,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 7,380,000 TOTAL $ 30,811.000 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 1992-93 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1992-93 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 24,299,000 Capital Facilities Fund 30,770,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 10,736,000 TOTAL $ 65,805,000 DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 1fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1992-93 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 19,194,000 Capital Facilities Fund 23,256,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 13,498,000 Bond 8 Interest Fund - 1958 36,000 TOTAL $ 55,984,000 -16- 07/08/92 DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 1992-93 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1992-93 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 1,766,000 Capital Facilities Fund 10,356,000 TOTAL $ 12,122,000 DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 1992-93 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District' s 1992-93 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 2,126,000 Capital Facilities Fund 17,418,000 TOTAL $ 19,544,000 DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 8 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Establishing the annual Gann Appropriations Limit for fiscal That the following resolutions year 1992-93 selecting the annual change in 1 California per capita personal income �•✓ as the cost-of-living adjustment factor, and establishing the annual Gann Appropriations Limit for fiscal year 1992-93 for each District in accordance with the provisions of Division 9 of Title 1 of the California Government Code, be, and are hereby, adopted by the respective Boards of Directors: DISTRICT RESO. NO. LIMITATION 1 92-93-1 $ 2,492,000 2 92-94-2 9,241,000 3 92-95-3 12,628,000 5 92-96-5 2,334,000 6 92-97-6 1,477,000 7 92-98-7 3,792,000 11 92-99-11 2,826,000 13 --- Not Applicable 14 --- Not Applicable Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these , minutes. -17- 07/08/92 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Settlement and Release reement with Shell Western E 8 P That the Settlement and Release �J nc. re c ai In for damages due to a Agreement with Shell Western E 8 P, crude oil discharge to Districts' Inc. relative to the claim filed by sewerage system in December 1991 the Districts for damages due to a crude oil discharge to the Districts' sewerage system tributary to Treatment Plant No. 2 in December 1991, be, and is hereby, approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That acceptance of $186,778.80 in settlement of said claim, as recommended by the General Counsel and staff, be, and is hereby, approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel . ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing Selection Committee to Solicit Proposals for cchoucting an Air Toxics Control Tenolndogy Demonstration Program Verbal staff report In response to Directors' questions regarding whether a specific engineering firm was being recommended for the Air Toxics Control Technology Demonstration Program, the General Manager stated that the staff's recommendation to the Executive Committee had been that it consider a sole source for Phases I and II, because of what it considered to be the unique qualifications of one firm, to conduct the project. Upon completion of Phases I and II , consideration of a firm to conduct Phases III and IV would come back before the Directors. The Boards' adopted policies and procedures allow for this process when determined appropriate by the Directors, although most projects are accomplished by soliciting proposals from several firms. In this instance, he clarified, the Executive Committee had determined instead that proposals should be sought from several firms, and that was their recommendation now before the Boards. Director Stanton stated that this matter was discussed at considerable length by the Executive Committee and that such policies and procedures were of concern to him because of the potential magnitude of the eventual scope of work for all project phases and as a matter of policy. He requested that a copy of the professional services procurement policies and procedures be provided to the Directors and that the language of the provisions be reveiwed. Following further discussion of the provisions, the Joint Chairman stated that the matter would be referred to the Fiscal Policy Committee for review and report back to the Boards. -18- 07/08/92 Authorizing staff to conduct an Moved, seconded and duly carried: - Air Toxics Control Technology _ Demonstration Program That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to conduct an Air Toxics Control Technology Demonstration Program; and, FURTHER MOVED: That a budget for Phase I and Phase II of said program, be, and is hereby, authorized in a total amount not to exceed $255,000.00, as follows: Consulting Engineer $100,000.00 Outside Laboratory Services 50,000.00 Districts' staff, equipment 105,000.00 and incidental costs TOTAL, not to exceed $255,000.00 Authorizing the Selection Committee Moved, seconded and duly carried: to negotiate a Professional Services Agreement for consulting That the Selection Committee be, engineering services for Phase I and is hereby, authorized to and Phase II of Air Toxics Control solicit proposals and negotiate a Technology Demonstration Program Professional Services Agreement for consulting engineering services for Phase I and Phase II of said Air Toxics Control Technology -- Demonstration Program, for consideration by the Boards at a future meeting. �✓ ALL DISTRICTS Director Buck Catlin introduced Beatrice Hunt-Wesson Amended Mr. Ed Snell , President of Settlement Agreement Hunt-Wesson, Fullerton, to the Directors. Director Catlin reported to the Boards that the Executive Committee had recently approved an amendment to the settlement agreement between Hunt-Wesson and District No. 3 for compliance with District's discharge regulations. Mr. Snell thanked the Directors for their help and that of staff' s in resolving the settlement agreement issues. ALL DISTRICTS Director Stanton and other Directors Authorizing staff to take posed several questions concerning the corrective measures re engine delivery, storage and installation of repairs for Job No. J-19-2 the engine generator sets, which questions were addressed by the Director of Engineering, who related that the manufacturer, Cooper Bessemer, and the construction contractor, Brinderson Corporation, each had certain responsibilities. During the course of the delivery, storage and installation, there were supervisory responsibilities by the retained - consultant, Cooper Bessemer. -19_ `" 07/08/92 The Director of Engineering summarized the process by which the engines were stored, cleaned, lubricated and installed. At the request of the Joint Chairman, the General Counsel noted for the Directors that the Executive Committee had recommended that certain actions be taken, and in view of the magnitude of the potential damage and the unlikely prospect of either the contractor or manufacturer to accept full responsibility, litigation would appear to be highly probable. General Counsel then indicated that all further questions should be held until such time as the Boards convene in closed session to review a matter of pending litigation with General Counsel. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to take corrective measures pertaining to engine repairs for Central Power Generation System at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-19-2; and, FURTHER MOVED: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue purchase orders to vendors for parts and services, as necessary, in order to proceed with immediate repairs to the engines, in a total amount not to exceed $500,000.00; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said repairs shall be paid from funds previously withheld from Job No. J-19-2 contractor and held on deposit pending completion of the ,lob in accordance with standard provisions of the contract. ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported to the �...� eneral ounse 's coonents Prior to Directors of the need for a closed Closed Session session as authorized by Government Code Section 54956.9 to review: 1) A pending matter of litigation entitled, United States Government vs. Montrose Chemical Company, County Sanitation Dis ricts et al. 2) Potential litigation re engine failure and damage re District Contract No. J-19A and J-19-2. Counsel advised the Directors re U.S. vs Montrose that he would present a verbal status report on pending settlement negotiations that would possibly lead to a final and complete resolution of the litigation. General Counsel reported re engine failures that he would present a verbal report to the Directors based on statements of the engine manufacturer representatives and the Districts' contractor indicating a refusal to assume reponsibility with the resulting implication of the need to file litigation for a resolution of the respective rights and responsibilities. The Board would be asked for direction relative to dealings with the Districts' contractor/vendor and direction for Counsel relative to the Districts' legal position. -20- 07/08/92 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Convene in closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 The Boards convened in closed session - - at 8:29 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board(s) of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed _ Meetings. ALL DISTRICTS At 9:09 p.m. the Boards reconvened in Reconvene in regular session regular session. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:09 p.m. , July 8, 1992. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:09 p.m. , July 8, 1992. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin Agreement with the City of a Palma and the Redevelopment That the Board of Directors hereby Agency of the City of La Palma adopts Resolution No. 92-100-3, approving Agreement with the City of La Palma and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of La Palma, electing a tax Increment pass-through relative to Amendment No. 2 to the La Palma Walker Street Redevelopment Project, in accordance with District policy and pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33676. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Agreement with the City of Stanton and Redevel 0pment That the Board of Directors hereby Agency of the City of Stanton adopts Resolution No. 92-101-3, approving Agreement with the City of Stanton and Redevelopment Agency of the City of Stanton, electing a tax Increment pass-through relative to Amendment No. 2 to the Stanton Community Development Project Plan, in accordance with District policy and pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33676. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:09 p.m. , July 8, 1992. -21- 07/08/92 DISTRICTS 5 8 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Professional Services _ Agreement with Boyle Engineering That the Selection Committee �../ Corporation for design and certification of the final negotiated construction services re Contract fee relative to the Professional Nos. 5-37-3 and 5-37-4 Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design and construction services required for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-37-3, and Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 4, Contract No. 5-37-4, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-102, approving said agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $165,100.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:09 p.m., July 8, 1992. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering That the Selection Committee Cor oration for deli n and certification of the final negotiated ry�i construction se ces re Contract fee relative to the Professional No. 7-20 Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design and construction services for Abandonment of Navy Way Pump Station and Force Main, and Construction of Replacement Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 7-20, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 92-103-7, approving said agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $66,410.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:09 p.m. , July 8, 1992. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:09 p.m. , July 8, 1992. -22- 07/08/92 DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:09 p.m. , July 8, 1992. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:09 p.m. , July 8, 1992. DISTRICT 5 Actions re I rovements to Ba side Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase Contract No. 5-34-3 Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering reported that Contract No. 5-34-3 is a $4.0 million project within the City of Newport Beach and includes the construction of a new sewer line in Pacific Coast Highway. Portions within the Corona del Mar commercial area are being constructed using tunneling techniques as are portions near the southerly boundary of the City of Newport Beach where excavations are deep. This contract also includes the repair of Big Canyon Trunk Sewer near Jamboree Road and the relocation of several sewer laterals installed by the City of Newport Beach to the District's old sewer line, thereby allowing abandonment of the old line. Also, a new median - in Pacific Coast Highway south of Hazel Drive is to be included. �..✓ Mr. Dawes stated that proposed Change Order No. 3, adding $704,675.00 and 14 calendar days to the contract for eight items of additional work, resolves a major portion of the extra costs resulting from encountering a large amount of undisclosed bedrock and other obstructions during the tunneling operation. The soil borings for this job did not reveal any substantial bedrock outcroppings; however, during the course of construction the contractor encountered significant bedrock which required different techniques and a major effort to get through. The change order reimburses the contractor for his costs including equipment repairs in accordance with the standard provisions of the specifications. Additional extra costs, consisting of earned bonus payments and for undisclosed rock encountered south of Morning Glory Road in the approximate amount of $250,000.00, remain to be settled with the contractor in a future change order. The Director of Engineering also stated that all items on the change order would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. After a brief discussion on this project, the following action was then taken. -23- 07/08/92 Approving Change Order No. 3 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: . plans and specifications for Contract o. 5-34-3 That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-34-3, authorizing an addition of $704,675.00 to the contract with Silveri 8 LeBouef for seven items of additional work or contractual revisions or settlements due to undisclosed obstructions encountered by the contractor during the tunneling process, repairs and relocations requested by the City of Newport Beach; plus one item whereby the contractor states that no future claims will be made for additional time nor additional work in a specified project area; and granting a time extension of 14 calendar days for contract completion due to inclement weather, and 35 days for early completion bonus eligibility, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:17 p.m., July 8, 1992. Assistant SeqVhtary49t the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 24 FUND NO 9199 - J1 GIST YIRNIKG CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/28/92 FARE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 _. COUNTY SANITATION OISTRICTS..OT.DRkMSE. CDUMTV.-___.._. _. . .. ._-.. CLAIMS PAID 06/03/92 POSTING DATE 06/03/92 i _..NARBANT NO. - -.._- NENCOR.._... ._. _.._._._._. _.__._AMOUN7_____.._._._-._____.-__DESCRIPTION-.. --- •I 122314 ASN ANAL1£IS $1.200.00 ENGINE OIL ANALYSIS ..-_.. 222375 ASIA . . ._.. .. . ._. .. .. . __...SAE.OB _..._....- . PUBLICATION 122376 A T S T $3.151.60 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 122377 AMERICAN IELEPMOAE A TELEORAPM $1.454.01 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES • 1223I8.. .__ A T A. . ____ . - _...__- .. _._...._.._..__-___ lLM2j_...-_.._._-_.___.J.OHG.DISTASICR_TALBPHOEIB_88RUICRA 122379 THE ADVANCE GRCLP $80.29 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 6 122380 ADVANCED COMPUTER PRODUCTSI $83.61 COMPUTER SUPPLIES . 122381 _ .. AIN PLASTICS ._. .. ... ...__. .___.5132.63 ... .__ __ _ NBCHANICAL.SUPPLIES.. . _ 122382 AIR PROOLCTE A CHEMICAL IN SI6.B15.00 O&M AGREEMENT OAT GEN SYST. M.0.8-9-89 f^ 122383 ALHAPBRA FOUNDRY CC LTD $10,285.82 MANHOLE COVERS '• _1223E1_ ALL .ANER 1CAdJISFHAL 7__._._.-.___ _JS1.OJ.._- -___--__-.-ASPNIWT__ _._-. 222385 ALLIED SERVICES $1/0.56 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS ]•' 122386 AMERICAN MEDIA INC 9113.95 TRAINING MATERIALS _.. _,...122367 ROBOT) INC A/CB AVERICAN SEALS -. .. .. ._.__...646BB.71 _. _._ ____- MECHANICAL DUPPLISB__.—__ 122368 APER SOCIETY FOR PICROBIOLG $649.95 TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS " 1223E5 APERICAR TYPE CULIURE COLLECTS f239.T5 LAB SUPPLIES " -._..122311C.. .. .. AMP_INCORPORATED.___-_ IT5.54 -_.___ELECTRIC.PARTS— ' 122391 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $2.020.00 EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIRS DIET 2 122392 ANGELUS FACIFIC CO f9DT.25 PRINTING ._.2__122393 .. . ._. A-PLUS STSTEPE.._ .. ._. .._. . .__. __ _._-_.-_._.. __3909.50-__.-__.__ --. NOTICED-6-AD9 122394 ABC LABORATORIES f2.295.00 LAB SERVICES M.O. 1-8-92 i^ C.0 122395 AQUATIC TESTING LABORATORY $3.100.00 LAB SUPPLIES "-4_122396 .__ .._.,._ ..ARK TECBNOLOGIEB. ._. ..._.___-_ __31.680.00—._-_ _.__CONSULTING 91RUCEB_ C „ a 122391 ASSOCIATED LABORATORIES $1.236.00 LAB SUPPLIBS 122398 ASSOC. ACPINIS. A CORSULIARTS $180.00 MEDICAL CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR _'. 12E3.99_. _ ... . ALPCPA/FYCPCFAIIC _P.LPP.._.CC.. _..___. -._.._-_._ _._AL O50.6A_._ .-_.__.._PUMP PARTS 122400 ARK LANDFILL $4.702.50 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.30-9-91 1 • 122401 RAW SAFETY A SUPPLY S1.551.66 SAFETY SUPPLIBS _.BACNE.LOd1REVENII01_ DEVICE_ .S19Y.➢n _BACRFLOg TIMM 122403 BANANA BLLEPRIRT 93.546.95 PRINTING N.0.30-10-90 3221C1 BARCLAYS LAL PLPLI£HEPS f93.30 PUBLICATION .1 R290B 0 BATEFAR_. .... . _. ._ .._.._.}60➢.00 . DEFERRED„COMP DISTRIBUTION 1220 BATTERY SPECIALTIES t519. I SAI88 ] ' 122407 BAKTER DIAGNOSTICS INC fer 6TOr36 36 LAB ICESUPPLIESAGREEMENT 1229R4 _.___. _B1S.7ECH_BETt 5AK17ASY FA 395.6D--- SERVJANITORIAL SUPPLIES 122410 BISNCP•S £MANNHEI PAINT SYP f395.95 JANITORIAL SUPPLIBS 12211Y BOEHRINGER XASC MANNHE IP $616.lB LAB SUPPLIES • 122512._ . BALSA ,CASCADE RADIATOR ERVICETS. _ _ $193.95 ._ _______—_. . OFFICE SUPPLI BS__ 122413 BOLEA ENGNEER SERVICE .938.25 ENGINEERING ERING S 1 " 1Y2117 BCTLE ENGINEERING CORP tAr9J0.Y5 BNGIN86RING SERVICES R68 91-101 ` _—_199119. _. . .. BRCNR A .CALC%EL.k CONSULT/90 618.36.T.9L.- _ --_.BNGIN88RIN0 SERVICES P1-37 122015 8UILDER.S EMPORIUM $219.65 NARDMARE/LUUMBER 1 " 122416 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE $55.92 PUBLICATIONS 122117 THE BOREAL If NATIONAL AFR _.._._. .A9TV.92..._. _. _ . _ PUBLICATIONS _._..__. . . ._.__ - 122418 BUSY 6RC REECEIATEE INC $1.942.06 SURVEY SERVICES M.G.8-12-9'i � "' 122439 BNT 6 f1REEC i0.011.636J PETTY GBH REIMBURSEMENT ' F FUND NO 9199 JT GIST WCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/28192 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 _ . C(UKT T. SAN ITPTI ON DISTRICTS OF .CRPRGE COUNT 7-_. CLAIMS PAID 06/03/92 POSTING DATE 06/03/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR .._ _ .. AMOUNT.-._ _ __._..__..._ DESCRIPTION . ... ... _.. ...._.__ 122420 C M 1 S7.953.71 ELECTRIC PARTS 122421 CS CCMF/F7 $76.02 . ._ _ VALVE PARTS 122422 CALTRCL IRC _ -- S6.916.87 MECHANICAL PARTS 122423 CALIFORNIA AU70 COLLISION INC .219.33 TRUCK REPAIRS 122424_ CALIF. ER.VIRONMENT9L_CQNTROLS. _ _..35.596.75_ __CHLORINATION PARTS 222425 CA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY a1.668.50 OCEAN MONITORING 4 •• 12292E CAL'S CAPEFAS. IRC. $4.196.39 PHOTO SUPPLIES 6 EQUIPMENT • 122428 CARLETON ENGINEERS _ .._ $2.097.39 . -.. _ _ _ _ BNGIN86RIN6 BRRVICBB M.0.9-9-90 •• 1224 28 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS 1152.078.30 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-36, I1-17, I-9 1 •• 122429 CASE POWER 6 EQUIPMENT $104.67 TRUCK PARTS $29430 CENTURY SAFIYY_ IMST_. E._.SUPP.__ _._._— ___ _3291.36._ ._. ___._.. __ SAFETY.SUPPLIES ____ 122431 DICK CEPEK INC 663.36 TRUCK PARTS 1 1224l2 CERTIFIED LABCAAIORIES 1217.20 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 122433 MICHAEL A CHAMP _ _ 53.000.00 _. _ _ OCEAN MONITORING_ . 12243 CHROME CRANKSHAFTINC $390.00 COMPRESSOR PARTS 12243 5 CLEYELANO COTTON PROD s190.03 LAB SUPPLIES _—_--I•AB_SUPPLIEB__. '• 122437 COLICH ARC SONS $1,682,883.00 CONSTRUCTION I-9 I •:x 122430 COLIC" i SONS S127.488.24 CONSTRUCTION 7-39-2 . 122139 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA _.._.__. .. 154.00._. _._-._-_. _ _. MECNANIChb REPAIRS_ 122440 COMPL'SA. INC. $2,039.10 COMPUTER SOETNARE/NARDVARE 122441 CCNAIC•S FMCICGPAP"T $269.38 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES _122442_. CONNELL. .ER._PARTS.. /._Dlv 122443 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL GIST $6.704.67 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES T ' 122444 CONTAINERIZCU CHEMICAL DISPO $15.547.35 TOXIC MASTS DISPOSAL I 122445 CONTINEK7AL AIR TOCLS . .INC. ..35.245.34..__..._._ TOOLS . ,. ,_..__ 122446- CCKTIKERIIL CISC CORP -- _ "----- _- -- 1267.6E ----- -- NBCHANICAL.PARTS 1 122447 CCK71h ER7/L 6RAFMICS i72.73 OFFICE SUPPLIES 292448- CCSTF PESA . .AUTC----nPPLL.._.___.-._ a149 15_ TRUCK PARTS 122449 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 922.09 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 122450 CRANE VEYOR CORP $319.84 ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT 122451 CRYSTAL CLEAR .LINDCW MAIAY. - .. _...___.. .32.250.00 _..._ ..... _.. . .. MINDON CLEANING 122452 STATE IF CALIFCINIA 9444.00 HAZARDOUS 'NA8T8 PERMIT— I ' 122453 CAPES i F(CRE $60.934.12 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38-3 122454 J.Y. C'AKGELQ. CO,-INC .._—_ ..._._.._373.16_._--.__—__ PLIR®ING SUPPLIES 122455 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE -- - — $1.036.49 TIR68 --- 1224'_6 PETER C DAVID CO S263.319.30 CONSTRUCTION 3-24-2 1224`:7 OF Ah2A CORPCRATIOA 1150.00_ .. _ EQUIPMENT RENTAL " 1229EB - DELTA FCIF FAC[LCTS - � 0189.53 - - - LAB SUPPLIES - 122459 DEZURIK /RO/CR CS CO S3.360.60 VALUE PARTS DICKSONS _. .._- ..—_3350.69_-. --_ ELECTRIC PARTS 122461 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT COMP - - --- 12.673.4E - ---_- - OFFICE BQUIPNBNT - -- ---- 1 122452 OCFAR ELECTRIC INC $1.057.31 ELECTRIC REPAIRS . _ 122463 CCAACC IRIEFFRISES IRC _ _ _ _ '875.00 , PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 RB PAIRS 12246 DUKA EDA CCRP - $89.62 PAINT SUPPLIES 1 ' 122465 D'Y ALS SALES 0606.9E FITTINGS I ' FUND EC 9199 - JT CIST WINNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5120192 PAGE 3 P EPOR7 NUMBER AP43 _...... CEUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY _. ....... _. .- ....... CLAIMS PAID 06/03/92 POSTING DATE 06/03/92 _LWARRAN7 NO. YENDCR __.. _ _. AMOUNT__.. DESCRIPTION 12246E EIP CO/RES SUPPLY $1,288.02 INSTRUMENT PARTS .. 122467 EASTMAN INC f2.262.27 OFFICE SUPPLIES_ 122468 ECONOMICS PRESS INC f48.08 PUBLICATION 122469 ELSEVIER SCIENCE PUBLISHING $784.50 PUBLICATION ` __._122470 .. ERCHAETER IN[ . . ... .. .. ...._.. .___. .__-$4,410.00-. _ .. __ _. . OCEAN MONITORING..1L.2.7-17-01 _ 122111 ENVIPCNPENIAL RESOURCE /£SCC 31.JB9.50 LAB SERVICES 1 " 122472 AARCR ESRIG. PO INC $300.00 MEDICAL SERVICES ... 222473 EXCELLENCE IN TRAINING a543.50 TRAINING MANUALS _ 1 ^ 122474 MARSHALL FAIRRES 9178.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 192475 JOMN B FALRENST EIN PE s3.400.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9. 1-16 .., . .. .122476 FECEPAL EEPPESS COOP ... ...__..._. .. $225.00 . . . .. AIR FREIGHT ..__---- 122477 FILTER SUPPLY CC $1.467.70 CHLORINATION PARTS 122478 FISCHER i PORTER CO $685.73 CHLORINATION PARTS 122479 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO S19277.26 __ .... .., LAB SUPPLIES 122480 FISORS INITRUPENTS $153,903.15 LAB EQUIPMENT M.O.11-13-91 1124F1 PLAT S 4ERTICAL CONCRETE $205.01 CONCRETE CUTTING • '. ..._..._.122402. FLCr SISTEP£ ._ . ... ... . . . ._ _ ... ......__... ..__._,_ ..31.481.32___... __..__ _.__ PUMP_PARTS_ ._ 122483 FLUORAMICS IRE $3I1.50 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES I 122484 CLIFFORD 1 FORRERT $3,769.50 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-12-91 ... 12248E CI7Y OF FOUNTAIE VALLEY . ., . ., ..i3.240.09...... .. ._._. ..._..... ..HATER USE - ._. ...__.....__. 12248E FCUNYAIR VALLEY PAINT S120.51 PAINT SUPPLIES ! " 122487 4 LE57 $360.10 TRUCK PARTS . .. _..122460 FIX INOUSIRIAL_SALEB . .... ...._,. ... . . .._......_ -.._..._f979.76--..--..-..-. --.. _TOOLS ,.. . .__ 122489 INC FOXBORO CO $406.77 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 1 •a 122490 FREEWAY TRUCK PARTS $57.07 TRUCK PARTS 122491 BUD fREY , ., _ iT1.16.._ DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 122492 FURON/DENCRON $74.07 - -- HARDWARE —--- I ' 222413 OFF SOLVE IAC 947.36 LAB EQUIPMENT ....__...122494 GET. INC. . . .._ .... .. ._ . ...... ...__ _._......32.878.32._-....____ ._.. OFFICE EQUIPMENT 122495 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO $1.680.00 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 122496 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO 3405.13 TELEPHONE SERVICBS • 122497 GIERLICN-PIICHELL IEC ... . .. 39.076.61 MECHANICAL PARTS I22499 GCLO EN CIESI SAWDUST FROG f6$137.41 BUILDING MATERIALS I ' 122499 WV T LAKES . INC f1 fi.41 TRUCK PARTS " ._._._.122501 GREAT LANES . HYDRAULICS INC.. _ ._.._._.. _,.. a2.796.80__. __..__..._,. .. . SURVEINSTRY SUPPLIICES-Me9 122501 DON GREEN f ASSOCIATES a31.500.00 DEFERY SERVICES M.O.6T3T- 122502 FPEO A PIRPEP a1$590.02 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION ' .- .. . 122504 HAPRIR G IC! INDLINC Ul FU STI $846.13 GAUGE 122505 hATC� L PARK INC .168.00 ENGINE PARTS 129506 MAUL CONTAINERS i2$129.90 TRASH REMOVAL 12250E PL HAWNNAVN CO INC ._. 3129.90 __ _ FILTER � 1225 HELP FAT ES TEMPORARY SERVICES S978.61 TEMPORARY 8 6RVIC 68 1 1225CO MILTI ARC $32 .72 MELDING SUPPLIES 12251 XCEHHIDER CYS CALIF IOC ,678.05 MECHANICAL PARTS 122510 RC XOFFMAN ANDIOR ISCO 66,139.06 INSTRUMENT 122511 J.T. NORVATM U ASSOC. $3.000.00 CONBTRUCTIBN SERVICES J-23-1. J-17 I FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST VCRKIRG CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/28/92 PAGE 4 _ REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE 000NTY. - CLAIMS PAID 46/03/92 POSTING DATE 06/83/92 '._ _ .WARAAKT NO, VENDOR _ ._ .. _._ . .AMOUNT _ ... ._.. __ . __—_. _ DESCRIPTION 122SI2 GORDON V HOYT 1460.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.O.9-12-90 '• ._ 222513 PS HUGHES CC INC . .. .. $2.065.63 PAINT SUPPLIES 122524 HUKTIRGTCR BEACH RUBBER STA $372.33 OFFICE SUPPLIES 122-15 MLKTIRGICR SLFPLY $545.42 HARDWARE 122516 I.G., INDU$TPIAL, CCRP. _ _. _ _..__. _.__$610.4 5._... _______ _._ CHEMICALS . __ 122511 IMPERIAL VEST CHEMICAL 315.214-.79 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-10-90 1 122518 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $653.01 CONNECTORS 122519 IhFOR7EKT SYSTEMS, INC. .. . _.;978.50 _ . .. _SERVICE AGRSBMENT 122520 IRGRAP FAKER $1.197.02 OFFICE SUPPLIES 122521 INLAND EPPIRE EQUIPMENT CC. $240.11 TRUCK PILOTS __ $22522 _ INTERMOUNTAIN SCIENTIFIC CORP- _.._. _ _,.______._._3L 327.15—. ._.___.__ _.__._ 1•ABSUPPLIE¢ __— 122523 INTERNATIONAL TELETRAC SYS DIV f351.81 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 122524 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $529.64 BATTERIES ISCLAP, INC .. $276.22. _ _ _ LAB SUPPLIES 122526 JARCEL ECIENTIFIC $1.617.66 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 122527 GREAT BESTERA SANITARY SUPP $1.062.57 JANITORIAL SUPPLI88 122528_ JAYS_ CATERING. _ .. _ DIRECTORS' MEETING BYP8N88 ._.__. ._. . __._ _.__.___—______..$949.46__ —___.__._.. DIRECTORS'_ _ .... _ 122529 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO .6 9.54 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 1 ' 122530 JENSEN ROILS INC $1.S33.99 TOOLS 122.31 JCNN$TOM[ SUPPLY _.. . .._ .. _._.. .333.99 ELECTRIC PARTS - 722522 KEENAN SLFPLV $1,157.06 - _ - PLUMBING SUPPLIES i - 122533 KING BEARING INC $342.90 MACHINE SUPPLIES 122534.. _ _ KNOX INDUSTRIAL . SUPPLIES. _....._.__.____ __.......—$724.68 SASE TV SUPPLIES __ i 122535 MARTIN KCROICK SR f3.000.00 CONSTRUCTION BBRVI SG I-9 ! '•a 122536 LAV CFFICES OF RCBERT L LAVOIE f2,658.95 SPECIAL LEGAL SERVICES -122537 CHARLES P. CRCVIEV CC. _ _-. -- SUPPLIES 12253 Ik S LIFE INS. CC. f57,332.18 DEFERRED CMP SFR 122539 KP LINOSTROM INC f3.088.05 WNSULTINO eBRVICE8 - NPOBB PERMITTING SUSAN MURCOTT_. ..._ _.$9,220.7Z._.____._.._.__. _ CONSULTING SERVICES 122591 MPS $113.64 PHCVPOGMPNIC SERVICES 122592 PAGNETEK RATIONAL ELECTRIC 58.101.34 ELECTRICAL PARTS - " 122543 PARLEY'S ECILER PFFAIR CC, INC _._ ...._. $64.52_ BOILER REPAIRS _ -- 122544 MARTEN 3346.41 - --- JANITORIAL SI/PPL188 122595 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $40.32 ELECTRIC SUPPLI88 _122546 KEYEMA INSTRUMENT________ 122B MCKENN4 EAR 8 EOLIP $ . PUMP PARTS 1225Ae 48 MCAAS7ER-CAR $95 R SUPPLY CC f95.6969 MECIFINNICAL SUPPLIES 122`-45 MEASLREMER7 ICERRIT STS INC __$936.42 _-_._. .._ INSTRUMENT EQU EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES__ 122551 MICROA6E [f MACHINING ,416.36 PUMICE BQUIPNENT- 1 ' 122551 MIDWAY XFG f MACNIN ING i8$430.61 PUMP PANTS 122552 MILLIPORC ARO/OP VISUAL _ _ .... f$66.81 __ LAB SUPPLIES - --_ -'�--� _-- OPTICS BUPPLIBS 122553 MITCEELLA ACIFICh VISUAL PHIS. 063.01 1 ' 1225'.4 MITCf ELI FACIF IC [ChSTRU STIR$ $599023.00 SAFETY 7-11-2 222556 MONTROY SUPPLY CO f123.13 SAFETY SUPPLIES 12255E MOORS PRODUCTS CO 1, . INSTRUMENT PARTS 122557 MO70POLA INC $ 1,438 438.565E INSTRUMENT PARTS 1 - FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5126/92 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF .ORANGE COUNTY .. .. _.. . .._ .. ___....--...___.— CLAIMS PAID 06/03/92 POSTING DATE 06/03/92 _-WARRANT NO. VENDOR .._ ._ _.. ..__.__ AMOUNT. _ . . _ .. .. DESCRIPTION ._ 12255E NRSPPP C/O WRITAR 3300.00 MEMBERSHIP FEES —.—. 1225-9 NAIICRAL VISUAL SYSTEMS _ . ,._ . .. $2.979.29 - OFFICE PARTITIOBG,.___._ 122560 REAL SLFFLY CC $977.51 LIGHTOIL 122561 GUST K NEWBERG CORST CO 6970.459.22 CONSTRUCTION PI-33 122562, NEWARK ELECTRONICS . . -._.. _._._.._.. _3162.27. __ __ ._.__ _._.... PVBLICATION. 122563 01 CORPORATION $500.25 LAB SUPPLIES i " 122564 OK SYSTEPS CO 918.501.30 CHLORINE M.O.10-10-91 __.. 122565. CN•LIKE ELECTRONICS. $207.61 ,, ELECTRIC SUPPLIRB 122BEG GRACLE CCPFCRATICR $11,100.00 CONSULTING - EPA PROGRAM 122567 ORANGE CELNTY AUTO PARTS C 3156.11 TRUCK PARTS . __122568 . ORANGE . VALVE 6 EITTING_. CO. _. .. _..__. . .___.... $1.533.05.._ _ _ _-__... __ .__FITTINGS. 122569 OXYGEN SERVICE $2.905.28 SPECIALTY GASES 122570 COUNTY IF GRANGE. EMA $5,000.04 AIR QUALITY TECH PROGRAM " ..122571 COUNTY CF GRANGE .. ._ .. .... .. . ..$5.140.61 SERVICE AGREEMENT-.8NZQ_JTlTlH 122573 CCUNTT CF GRANGE S25.00 BIR FEE � ^ 122573 PACIF SALES 352.59 PAINT SUPPLIES 22575_... .. PACIFIC -SAFETY_SOUIFMENI _C0._. _ ._—i1$723.26__ ___—._._—eELETF. NEPSERVI ' 122576 PACIFIC BALL 3$68.U5 RENTAL E6 IPBVICee J fT7 122517 PACIFIC LATER EONDITIDRIAG C 36S.A0 RENTAL EQUIPMENT " X 222571 . . PALLET PEP 9 IO MAR SYSTEPS. __ _.. _. . _..___. ..._ ._.s261.26_ _ _.. .___ ___ .TALLETPNE .BYBTEM.,IjODIFICATIOM9 T 12251E PALLETS L ACCESSORIES CO $1.$36.78 PALLETS - i� bG 122579 PARAGON CABLE 3J 6.7B CABLE SERVICES 22580_. _ - INSTITUT ARMAND-FBAPPIER_.—__ — AL.000.00.--- -1^AB._BUPR5I84.-__ 1225el ACT PENDERGRAFT 3460.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 122582 PERKIK•ELFER CORPORATION S73.805.36 LAB SUPPLIES 122Ee3 PERFA LLEPICPTIC6. INC ... _._3579.92__.__.—._ _ __ MBCKANICAL,PARTS L71 222584 PIPA GRO SYSTEPS INC $105.746.40 RESIDUALS RSNOVAL M.O.5-8-91 1 122585 PIONEER BANK $56,521.90 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 5-3E-3 __.1225a6_ . .. .. PITNEY BOWES . __—____POSTAOE—MAIRINE. LEASE 122587 PCLYPURE INC $10.901.31 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-87 1225ES FINER ELECTAC SLPPLY CC $724.67 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES • ' ._. . IZP589 MAROLO PRIMROSE ICE .. ... .. ._.. ___ __ _._. 391.09 _ .._ _ ICE _ 122590 TIME PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. 39.720.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPBCfION M.O. -1 122591 PRY OR AEPCRT 359.00 SUBSCRIPTION _—_122592. PUTZPEISTER INC_._.. ___ ._..._..___...._— . —_3555.16—_ __—_.._ _ PUMP„PARTS _ 122553 RED LINE SPIES $196.54 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 122594 REDI EXPRESS $28.35 MESSENGER SERVICE ___ 122595 REISH MARINE STUDIES. INC _. _... ._352 D.00_ _—_ _ . . _ ._-LAB SERVICES _ 122556 KCJUNKIN•FEPUBLIC SUPPLY $2.291.65 PLUMBING SUPPLI69 I " 192597 RICE COLCR LAE 381.0E PRINTING 12259e RCBIKSOK FERTILIZER CO ._- _ . . _ .._ ._i1.3J 1.79__ _.. _ _CHEMICALS 122599 ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL 3273.5E INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 1 ' 122600 PEGGY RUPP $540.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 122601 RYAN•HERCC _ _.. $9.137.19 _ PUMP PART 122602 SAFETY EL EEN CORP S403.75 PARTS PR 22260 SANLI FE IRLLSIAUL FLASIiCS $525.77 PLV7®ING SUPPL IES FUND NC 9199 - JT DIST AORKINC CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/26/92 PAGE 6 - - 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CCLh1Y SANITAIICN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06/03/92 POSTING DATE 06/03/92 _-_VASRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT_ DESCRIPTION 122604 OGUG SARVIS $350.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 1226C5 SCCT1 SFECIALTV GASES IAC $66.81 SPECIALTY GA858_ _. _ _ _____ _ 12260E SEA-BIRO ELDESIGNS CS IAC $1,018.00 IFFICE SNT UP i 422606 SEA COAST SPECIALISTS 31.OIE.77 OFFICE SUPPLIES .1226C9 SECURITY SPECIALISTS. _ -. . .. - 3992.93 __ .. SECURITY SYSTEM ART PARTS_ . 122630 Sh AMRCCIK CONVEY CA COOP f2.064.04 MECNANIOAL PARTS 1 ' 222612 SWELUN SUPPLY ALES S91967.00 MUURDWTOOLSARB/TOOLS 122612 SIGMALD CN HALE -. . - f6$124.93 TUBLI 122613 SIGMA CNEFIC/L CO 3129.93 PUBLICATION 122014 SIGNS ETC. s99 U.23 SIGNS 12261E SILVERI i LE BOUEF _ __-__.___--1526$198.00__ ___--__. SOILSWNST 5-34-3 __-_,_ 122616 SMITH•E PERM CO f394.00 8OIL9 TESTING N.O.7-17-91 1 12261E SVITP PIFE E SUPPLY Ih[ f$87.50 PLUMBING EQUPLIES IPMENT, 122611 SCLTA C[AE1 LA lED _ _ SB7.83 _ RENTAL e(jUIPMBNT_ 12261E SCUT 6ERA CALIF EOISON CO f$7.045.45 POWER 122620 SO CAL GAS CO fi\395 d5 NATURAL GAS 122621 SOUTHERN BOUNTIES._.0.1 L_ IQ . __ _ _._._-__32Dr 061.1'i._._. .-_.__ .. . -. _DIOTO PROCESSING _ -- �-� � � PHOTO PROCESSING 122622 SOUVENIR FNOTC 145.4E 1 K 122623 SPEAKER GLPPCRT $145.9E PRINTING ' = 122623 SPECIAL iLIE7U SYSTEFS IAC _. . _ _ 11230.88 PLUMBING SUPPLIES - 122124 SPER IACLSTRICS INC 3719.14 LAB SUPPLIES -- ------ --- -- f 122625 STAR TOOL t SUPPLY CO f70.32 TOOLS 122626 STERLING ART . _ ._ --. - _.....-..... --_--_.f114.2]_---_-._.___---.OFFICE SUPPLIES _ >0 122627 STROMROTNE PRINTIAG $1.255.29 PRINTING 122E28 SUMMIT STEEL $1.684.94 METAL •• (7) 122629 SUNSET F(RC .. __.-... - _ ._ . . .-_.__ $396.56 __... TRUCK PARTS 122631 SURVEYO IAC flr$94.80 LAB BUPPLIEB 1 ' 122632 TAYLOR-DU SERVICE CO f99.B0 TOOLS -_-., 122613 TATLOR.DU NN NF4 COMPANY __-_._.___.iL341.44_-._..._-._. .-__.__ ELRCTRIC CART PARTS--- - 122634 TNCNFSOh ICK US TRIAL SUPPLY $110.85 HARKEYS 122E-4 TRAVEL LICK i SAFE SERVICE fIl0.B0 TRAY 122635 TRAVEL TR/VTL - f2.093 OG..-. _. TRAVEL ARTS- 12263E TRUCK t AUit SUPPLY IAC $4.011 61 - TRUCK PARTS - . . 'l 122E-7 TR UKSPE CT 34.611 75 TRAINING REGISTRATION "1638 JG TUCKER t SON INC .. - .-_--_S91D 23._-. - . _ FILTER 121611 TWINING LABORATCRIES OF $3.709.50 -- PIPS YNeP6CTI0N8---�--- r 122640 ULTRA SCIE All FIC $207.00 LAB SUPPLIES 122641 Lh10h BARN ... 36r007.00 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 7-I1_2 ' _ SAFETY SIGNS 1226i2 UNITE SICK CC f1r005.00 122644 UNITED STATES ELEVATOR CORP f705.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT _ 122045 VAR SCIENTIFIC _ _ _ $4,261.51 _ LAB EUPPLI88 - 122646 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CC f9$415.58 VALVE PARTS 1 ' 12269E VAh WATER L FREERS $630.12 CAUSTIC SODA _ 122640 VARIER ELSIAEIE F[RNS 3$99.40 OFFICE BUPPLIE9 12264E VARIAN A&PLYTICAL INSTRUMENTS f99.40 LAB BUPPLI88 122649 YpPI AN ASSOCIATES PTES INC 5445.71 SERVICE AGREEMENT FUND NC 9199 • JI OIST Y(RXINE CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/28/92 PAGE 7 REPORT NUXBER AP43 CCU97Y SANITATION DISTRICTS Of .ORANGE. COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06/03/92 POSTING DATE 06/03/92 ._.'.YAPRAN7 NC. . . VEROOR. . . . . .__ . . .__ ... .AMOUNT.__.. -__ . .._. _ . .. ... . OESCRIPTION ' 1226E0 VERTEX CCPFUTER CABLE PRCCTS $1.433.91 COMMUNICATIONS SUPPLIES 122651 VIDEO ARTS ST99.73 _ .-....._. ...... . .PUBLICATION 122652 CARL WARNER 6 CO 9491.01 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 1226E3 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SLPPLY 613,377.64 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.0-8-90 •__-122654 WESTRUS ILTERNATIORAL.. ___. _.______.__._.____..366.35 .--.---_--. —TRUCK_-PART$__. ____ 1226'.5 CITY OF .U[S7PIRSTER $3.950.00 MANHOLE ADJUSTING 0 '• 122656 VMESSCE VAREC S3.635.19 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES _- —.122657 ROURKE 6,WOODRUFF 6 OR . . . ....... ._- 65E0561.50 _. ..... .. LBGAL eERVIC3R,2-19-92_-_ a 1226E8 XEROX COPP $135.00 COPIER LEASES 122659 XICOP $287.00 LAB SUPPLIES _12266C__ - ..GECRIE ' 122661 RICHARD E ECOAR $200.60 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION { --------------- - i07AL CLAIMS PAID 06/03/92 ...929.A59... aaysaasassavv aaa 1 X " 01 OPER PIANO $961.37 ' --11 CAP.PAC FUND. ._._. -_ _ ._..___.___.._._._.__—.----{{22.50 M2 OPER FUND - $14,245.34 " n P2 CAP PAC FUND $2,452.02 Y3 OPER FUND _. .._ .................. ...-._._......... _-__._.. 03 CAP FAC FUND $265,072.96 ----- ---- - ------ 1 V5 OPER FUND $1,350.17 5-CAP FAC FUND._.-_ _._—.__. _____. 8687.338.50 #6 OPER FUND $175.03 47 OPER FUND $2,236.68 ' ..._...__#7 CAP FAC FUND .- 0192.006.29 _ _._-.. 021 OPER FUND $347.32 . .. 1 011 CAP FAC FUND $1,557.33 -h3 OPER FUND _ _..A21_16 814 CAP FAC FUND 526,675.22 R5&6 OPER FUND $2,053.26 V5&6 CAP FAC FUND _ _ _. _ _ _112.39 _ #7 _ 6 OPEN FUND 27. 1 O7&10 OPER FUND 66,679.8080 ..._.._. OPT OPER FUND 669.63 CORE i9,1961}5, 76.b2 1 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $10,250.96 .TT WORKING CAPITAL _ ..4169,200.34 _., _ $4,929,459 30 1 FUND NO 9159 JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/10/92 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION OISIR ICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY I , CLAIMS PAID 06117/92 POSTING DATE 06/17/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 122688 AG TECH COMPANY 1126.570.35 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 1226F9 ACIICP OCCP PCPAIR COPP $113:20 DOOR REPAIRS 122E54 ACV ANCE[ COMPUTER FPODL CTSI 825.50 CONPUTBR SUPPLI88 122651 ACVAhCO CCKS1RUC10R5 INC $1.129.899.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-34-3, P1-35-2 122692 AIR PHOTO SERVICES 11.319.94 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY 122693 ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY CO LTD 51.393.48 MANHOLE FRANKS 122691 ALPHAGAZ $743.62 SPECIALTY GASES 122695 AMERICAN CIMPENSAITON ASSCC $160.09 NOTICES 6 ADS 122ES1 RCPCC INC L/CP APFRICAN SEALS 53.022.51 HARDWARE 122697 ANAHEIM CCKVALESCENT HOSPITAL 115.5112.97 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 122698 ANAHEIM SAW SHOP INC $239.15 TOOL REPAIRS 'i 122C99 HLAKE P ANOEPS(K S71.87 CELLULAR TELEPHONE REIMBURSEMENT 122706 ANGEL SCIENTIFIC PROEUCTS 5969.75 LAB SUPPLI88 1227t1 ABC LAPERAICRIES $235.01 SERVICE AGREEMENT 1227V2 AOUAIIC TESTING LABORATORY $2,050.00 LAB SERVICES 1227C3 ABATER SERVICES INC $7,440.62 UNIFORM RENTALS - - 122709 AR IZONA INSTRUMENT $1.760.15 INSTRUMENT PARTS R1 122711 ARPCW TRL CK BCCILS 0 EUUIP /2.090.35 TOOL BOXES >C 1227(6 ART ICONS 31.312.79 AWARD FPAMBS 122767 ASSCCIA7EC LAPCNATORILS 9124.06 LAB SERVICES Cp 122708 OC ANALYTICAL 912,982.00 LAB SERVICES 122709 BKK LANDFILL 339.830.74 GRIT REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 122730 DPW SAFETY L SUPPLY $563.96 SAFETY SUPPLIES ii W 322711 PACKFLCN FPEVEK710R' DEV7CL $160.00 BACKFLOW TESTING 122712 DIANNA P.LLEFRINT 51.047.74 BLUEPRINTING H.0.10-30-90 h-. 122723 6ATTERY SPECIALTIES $281.0 BATTERIES 122714 RANTER DIAGNOSTICS INC $8.859.94 LAB SUPPLIES 122715 RAYLESS STATICNEAS 5213.9R OFFICE SUPPLIES 322716 REA2ER CFVELCFPERT WEST 530.512.00 REFUND ANNEX FEES 222717 PEL-APT FFCELCTS $353.69 LAB SUPPLIES 122718 FELL SECURITY $2.122.13 SECURITY SUPPLIES 122719 BULSA RADIATOR SIRVICC $334.03 RADIATOR REPAIRS 122720 MON-A•RUFS 9328.86 TRUCK PARTS 122721 BCOT BARN 553.24 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES _ 122722 RRCWK A CALCWELL CONSULTING 1197.406.119 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19 122723 PLILCER•S EMICRILM S148.87 HARDWARE/LUMBER . I 122724 GAMY G S7REEC $980.26 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 122725 LUTLER PAPER COMPANY $463.44 OFFICE SUPPLIES 122726 C M 1 $112.06 METER 322727 CAL FLEX INC 5582.63 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 122728 CIL•ELASS FCP RESEARCH INC. 5797.25 LAB SUPPLIES 12-.725 CALTRCL INC $176.87 INSTRUMENT SUPPLI88 1227311 JOHN P CALAPRICE PHU $21.975.70 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.11-10-90 122731 CALIFCFhIA ALIOPATIC DAIL $647.80 SERVICE AGREEMENT 122732 CAL•S CAPERAS ANC VI EEO 5107.22 CAMERA REPAIRS 122733 CERILRY EAFEIV IRR7 S SLFF $4,246.32 SAFETY SUPPLI88 FUND NC 9199 • JI GIST VEPKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/10/92 PAGE 2 l REPORT NUMBER AP03 CCUNTY SANITATICN DISTRICTS OF COARSE COUNIT _ CLAIMS PAID 06/17/92 POSTING DATE 06/17/92 WARRANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION -. .. 1221.. CERTIFIED LA PO RATORIES 3243.99 CHEMICALS 122735 CHEVNCN LSA INC S4.307.V9 OIL & GREASE 122736 CHROPE CRANKSHAFT INC $375.60 TRUCK REPAIRS 122737 CIRCULATING AIR $995.00 AIR CONDITIONING REPAIRS 122738 CITY WIRE CLOTH INC $1.886.09 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 122739 CCAS7 FIFE EGUIPMENT 1450.OL SERVICE AGREEMENT E 122746 CCCA CCLA FECOS DIVISICN $35.176.1`- REFUND USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT 122741 CCPFRESSCF CCPPCNENIS IF CA 1745.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS I " 122742 CCPPUSA. INC. $1.771.19 COMPUTER HARDWARE/SOFTWARE 122743 COMPUSERVE 118.86 COMPUTER SERVICES 122744 CONARO.S PHOTOGRAPHY $283.30 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES _ 122745 CCRNELL IF PARTS / DIV 3467.67 TRUCK PARTS I " 322746 CCNSCLEIAIEC ELFCIPICAL CIST 312.547.00 ELECTRICAL PARTS 122747 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC $6,898.83 TOOLS _ 122748 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CD $1.616.25 CHLORINE M.O.10-9-91 122749 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS 147.64 PRINTING 122750 CONVERSE CONSLLTANTS 0 C 93.341.54 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-17-91 122731 CCCPER INEUS7AIES INC sIGS.TS GASKETS - - - M 1227E2 CCLKIY 66CLESALE ELECTRIC $366.20 ELECTRIC SUPPLIER X 1227E--3 CRESCENCC ASSCC. INC $1.000.08 COMPUTER SOFTWARE = 122754 CHEMICAL PROCESSORS AND/OR 31.058.09 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 122755 STATE CF CALIFORNIA 3160.00 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION FEE 122756 OBE INC $465.26 MECHANICAL PARTS 1 1227E.7 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE $1.4E B.15 TIRES IS 122758 OE ARIA CORPCRAIION 5150.90 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 1 222759 0EAVER MANUFACTURING CO. $278.95 TRUCK REPAIRS N 122760 101 CUS70PCR sERYitE• INC. 9129.90 LAB SUPPLIES I 3227E1 DEIURIN AND/CR CS CO 51.492.87 VALVE PARTS - --- - 122762 CIATEC ENIIRCNP FAIAL $5.466.59 CHEMICALS M.0.8-14-91 .... . .... 122163 GISCC PRIA7 COPPANY 51.842.53 OFFICE SUPPLIES 122764 DOMAN LLECTRIC INC $9.515.74 ELECTRICAL SERVICES 122765 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC $27,981.53 PLANT MAINTENANCE A REPAIRS 122746 FMA SERVICES INC 12.926.31 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-23-2 1227E7 Ell SYSTEPS 1486.96 ELECTRIC PARTS -_. 1227EB EASTPAN INC $4.136.00 OFFICE SUPPLIER _. ......_. 122769 EPERALD VILLAEE ASSOCIATION $15.111.46 REFUND CONNECTION FEE 122770 LNCHANTEN INC 94.010.0V OCEAN MONITORING M.0.7-17-91 122771 ENVIRONMENTAL PROD. USA $1,756.16 TRUCK PARTS 122772 Ex E,ELLENCE IN TRAINING $690.00 PUBLICATION 122773 E6IDE ELECIRCNICS $348.10 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS I 222774 EXXON COPPANY $20.127.86 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT III 122775 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICF 5103.399.9P RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 122776 1OHN R FALA ENSTEIN PC 13.406.VU CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9, 1-16 122777 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP $925.00 AIR FREIGHT 122770 CHE PLES7 INC 34.022.83 HARDWARE 122779 FILTER SIP PLY CC 1637.65 MECHANICAL PARTS I �- FUND NC 9199 • JI DIST VCRNIKG CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/10/92 PAGE 3 IS 0EPOPT NUMBER AP43 CCURTY ShNIIATICN DISTRICTS OF CRINGE COUNTY II CLAIMS PAID L6/11/92 POSTING DATE 06/17/92 .I VIRRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION i 1227P0 FISCHER I PCRTER CO $2.T61.53 CHLORINATION PARTS 2227E1 FISHER SCIEAT IF IC CC 13r 017.65 LAB SUPPLIES 122782 FISCAS IKSiPUPEhTS $868.43 LAB EQUIPMENT 122783 FLO-SYSTEMS 511.507.00 PUMP PARTS 122784 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $45.05 FILM - - ' 1 I 122785 FP"Y INDUSTRIAL SALES $124.99 OFFICE FURNITURE 1227A6 THE FOIRCRO CO $197.63 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 1227E7 CITY CF FLLLEATCh $62.43 WATER USE 122788 GAKTIN PICRC COMPUTER RENTAL $225.00 COMPUTER RENTAL 122789 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $3.454.73 CHEMICALS 122790 GENERAL ELECTRIC CC $2.150.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - HARMONIC STUDY. --.-. 122751 GENERAL OCEAhICS. INC. $1.434.00 LAB SUPPLIES 222752 GENERAL IELEFHCKE CC 9203.94 TELEPHONE SERVICES 122793 CONDOM'S INC $2.182.50 OFFICE FURNITURE 122794 GRAHAM 0 JAMES $1,419.96 LEGAL SERVICES - MONTAGES CLAIN • 122795 GRAPHIC CCNTRCLS $173.56 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES -- 122756 CIA CREEP 0 ASSOCIATES $14.304.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.7-17-91 --- -. ..ITT 1221S7 MSG TECHKCLCGY $292,500.00 CONSTRUCTION J-23-2 >C 122790 HAAKEH ECUIFPENI CC $929.23 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 122799 HACH COMPANY $190.00 LAB SUPPLIES - 122800 HALFRIN SUPPLY CO 5236.15 HARDWARE A ' 222801 HAMMCAY SLSINESS FORDS 532.05 PRINTING -1 -. 122602 0APRIKG70 IRCUSIRIAL PLASTI 9986.09 VALVE - - I �GO 122EO3 HATCH S KIRK IKC $908.29 ENGINE PARTS 1 1220P4 PL HAWN CO INC $344.89 PILTERe W- 222805 HELPMATES TEMPORARY SERVICES $427.92 TEMPORARY SERVICES 122801 HICKS IND. FIBERGLASS COMP 5205.00 MANHOLE COVERS 122807 HCEREIGER CVS CALIF IAC 51.327.53 HECHAMICAL PARTS 322000 J.T. FORVAIH E ASSOC. 521700.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES.J-23.. J-17 . .._._.. 1228U9 PS HUGHES CO INC $473.98 HARDWARE 122810 HUNTER CORPORATION $583.827.00 CONSTRUCTION J-19-1 122811 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $20.75 WATER USE .I 122912 HUK71KGTCN VALLEY TCCL $242.00 TOOL RENTALS 122E13 I.C. TNCLSIRIAL CORP. $2,851.92 CHEMICALS - - 122811 IMFEPIAL NEST CHEMICAL 5381255.55 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-14-90 .._. ._ _... _. 122815 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS 5503.42 CONNECTORS 1 122616 IKFOTRIEVE $8.50 LAB SUPPLIES 1221117 IKCRAK PAPER 9404.03 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES - 122616 IKIEPYEC $215.86 LAB SUPPLIES 122829 IKTERNATIChAL TELETRAC SYS DIV 5623.3E TOOL 12282U INTCRSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $1,084.01 BATTERIES - '- 12PR21 IRVINE RANCH VATLP DISTRICT $98.44 WATER USE 122P22 JUDY CRGLCER $375.00 TRAINING SERVICES 122823 JLA CRECIT CCRF $145.32 MICROFICHE MERIDEN LEASE 122824 GREAT LISTENR SANITARY SUPF $1.451.96 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 122825 JAY-S CATERING 9306.01 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSES FUND NC 919^ - JT LIST NCRB I%C CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/IU/92 PAGE 9 REFORT NUMBER AP43 CCUNTY SANITATION OISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY _. CLAIMS PAID 06/17/92 POSTING DATE U6/1T/92 .WARRANT PC. VFRCOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION _ 122626 JIP•S SLSFEN£ICh SERVICE $25.00 TRUCK PARTS 122827 JOHNSON CONTROLS INC 5652.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 122828 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 571.21 ELECTRIC PARTS 122929 RAN PPCOLCTS $116.27 HARDWARE 122830 KAS SAFETY PRCCUCTS $88.30 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 122611 KEhhEOY NYCRALLICS $1,339.50 PUMP REPAIRS T 122832 KEN.S OIL INC 675.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 122833 KING BEARING INC fZ.356,66 MECHANICAL PARTS 1 122834 PROP IKOLSTRIAL SUPPLIES f6.953.15 TOOLS 122835 MARTIN RCRCICK SR f2.598.50 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 122936 LA CILLtLAR IELEF"AS CC f666.11 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 122837 LA FALFA ROVALE f1.027.75 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 122A38 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO 5756.52 PRINTING 122839 LIMI70R0UC COMP S1.345.26 REPAIR PARTS 122840 SOCO•LVhCP COPP 62112.08 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 122941 PIC ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS INC. $5,696.00 OCEAN MONITORING I - -122842 PFS $261.24 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES R1 112043 MACCFCO f372.45 SERVICE AGREEMENT X 1228E9 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS INC $1,156.62 MECHANICAL PARTS _- 222845 MALCOLM PIRNIE INC $1.508.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 1298A6 ROBERT SKEELS 1 CO $N9.83 SAFETY SUPPLIES A ' 122847 MAhMCLE ACJUSTIAG i30.890.00 HANMOLE ADJUSTING --I --022848 MARVIC FtECTRChiCB $25.35 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 1 122849 MA1T CNLOR INC f2.39S.53 CHLORINATION PARTS to 1 122054 DON MAURER 11.300.00 OCEAN MONITORING - .yam 192651 MCNASTER.URR SLPFLY CC $179.1E SHELVING 1228/2 MEASLREPENT CEKTROL SYS INC $648.77 METER 122853 PICPCAGE CCPFLTCP $746.71 COMPUTER HARDWARE 122850 RICACAGE CF CCRRI7CS 62.268.1E COMPUTER HARDWARE/SOFTWARE 122655 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO $3,540.00 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 122856 NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATI $192.50 PUBLICATIONS ... 122657 NEWPORT ALTO CENTER 52.768.77 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT _ 122658 NrWAPK ELtCTRCNICS $982.70 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 122GE9 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 69.25 WATER USE ._. 122860 01 CORPORATION $1.711.50 LAB SUPPLIES 122PG1 OFFICE PAVILION/INTERIOR RES $1,233.07 OFFICE FURNITURE 1228f2 OK IYSIEP£ CC $31,727.70 CHLORINS M.O.10-9-91 1228E3 CRINGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C $97.60 TRUCK PARTS I' 122EE9 CRANGE CCthTV FARM SCFFLT C 62.116.9E GROUNDSKSEPING SUPPLIES 122865 ORANGE VALVE f FITTING CC. $932.09 FITTINGS 122866 ORITER CORP $3.209.26 MECHANICAL PARTS _ III 122067 OXYGEN SERVICE 672909 SPECIALTY GASES 122SE8 CCUNTV IF GRANGE $3,694.06 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES 122869 CSCOC SELF•FLNOEC PECICAL 1 61OO.000.J0 INSURANCE PREMIUM ADVANCE 122E11 CCLKIV SANITATICN CISIFICT $2,699.01 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE .I 322671 COUNTY OF CRAhGE $414.00 PERMIT FEE FUND NO 9199 • JT FIST WEPXIKG CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/10/92 PAGE 5 RETORT NUMBER AP43 CCUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 66/17/92 POSTING DATE 06/l7/92 WARRANT NO. VEKDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION - 122872 PSSI $659.25 T.V. SEWER LINE DIST 7 122873 PACCO SALLS $365.96 PAINT SUPPLIES 122874 PACO PUMPS $1,119.02 PUMP PARTS 122875 PACIFIC SAFETY EDUIPMERY CO $34.02 SAFETY SUPPLIES 122876 PACIFIC LATER LONDITICKIKG C f68.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 122877 FACENET $54.06 PAGER RENTALS 7 ' 122078 PAK WEST $2.652.81 . JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 122679 PALMIERI, TYLER. WIENER. 518.862.76 LEGAL SERVICES - OIL WELLS 122060 PATTEN CORP/ TAYLOR INS7R $5.079.91 STRIP CHARTS 222681 PENINSULA LABCRATCRIES $769.00 LAD SUPPLIES 122AP2 PERKIN-SUER CCPFSRATIOR 9342.58 LAB SUPPLIES - - - 122883 PFEIFFER L CO $674.69 PUBLICATION 122884 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS INC $239.609.55 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 122085 PLAINS IFLEVALUE HARDWARE $119.92 HARDWARE 122946 PCLYPETRICS♦ INC. $1,016.86 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 122PE7 PCLYFLRE INC 919,322.14 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-I1-92 - 122888 HAROLC PRIMROSE ICE $194.00 ICE "T 122889 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. $2.211.U0 SOIL TESTING X 122894 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. 94.661.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91 122891 PULSAFFECER 92,514.15 PUMP PARTS 122P92 PL T2FEISTEP INC ' 501.53 ELECTRIC PARTS A' 122893 PPP ELEC 701C MCTORS 5900.7G PUMP REPAIRS --4 122894 RPM COMPUTER RIBBON COPP 52.156.71 OFFICE SUPPLIES - I lb 122895 RAINBOW DISFOSAL CO $1,368.96 TRASH DISPOSAL 1 122P96 RD SYSTEFS INC 112,179.15 CARD READERS - SECURITY SYSTEM IJI 122897 RECYC IKE $85.441.34 RESIDUAL$ REMOVAL M.O.3-13-91 12289E RECI Ell PISS S97.65 COURIER SERVICES I 122899 MEISh MARINE STUDIES. INC 11.000.00 OCEAN MONITORING -- -. 122960 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY S1.163.59 PLUMBING SUPPLIES.. -- 122901 J R PCBERTS CCRF $133,892.00 CONSTRUCTION J-23-1 122902 JCAN B ROSE f259.00 LAB'CONSULTANT _ . .. 1225L3 RCSEFEUA7 ANALYTICAL 9297.04 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 122904 RYAh-HERCL $359.51 INSTRUMENT PARTS 122905 SADDLEBACK INN S37.33 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 122906 SAFETY-KLEEN CORf 12.286.9W PARTS CLEANER - --- --- 122907 ST IARI CCKIAIKFR $1.123.53 BEYOND USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT 1229CO SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL FLASTICS $741.10 PLUMBING SUPPLIES �. 122S TV THI SC 6CFLE9 CC S3.000.00 EASEMENT APPRAISALS " 1224110 SEA EIRC ELECTSCNICS INC $343.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 122911 SEA COAST UESIGNS $1,012.67 OFFICE FURNITURE 122912 CITY OF SEAL BEACH $160.50 WATER USE 122923 SEARS RCEPUCM C CC $695.21 REFRIGERATOR 122919 SEAYEN7 LR ES f1.120.00 OCEAN MONITORING 122515 SEC URI IT SPECIALISTS 3285.44 SECURITY SYSTEM PARTS � I 222916 MEREL E. SEXTON $278.00 REFUND ANNEX. FEE OVERPAYMENT j 122917 SHAMROCK SUPPLY 11,706.67 TOOLS FUND KC 9195 - JT GIST LCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/10/92 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 -- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06/17/92 POSTING DATE 06/17/92 --.VARRANI NC. VENCCP AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ._ . _ . _. ... 122918 SHURCLUCK SALES 36.625.09 TOOLS - . 122919 SILICON SYSTEMS INC 9250.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT -_.. 122920 SKILL FATE. INC. $10.12 PUBLICATION 122921 SKYPARK LALK.IN MECICAL CLI $35.00 PRE EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS '._..._. 122922 SLIDE YASIER $336.10 PRESENTATION AIDE 222923 SMITH-EMERY CO 3696.U0 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-17-91 122924 SMITH PIPE 6 SUPPLY INC .811.65 PLUMBING SUPPLIES - 122925 SO CCAST AIR CLALITY $260.04 PERMIT FEE 1" 122926 SCUTL CCAST AIR OLALITV $825.00 PERMIT FEE 122521 SCLTF CCAS1 AIR GLALITY $325.00 PERMIT FEE __. 222928 SCUTFCRK CALIF EDISON CC 525.408.88 POWER 122929 50 CAL GAS CO $13,527.26 NATURAL GAS 122930 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO $5,577.68 DIESEL FUEL 122931 SCUVENIR FHOTC $126.51 FILM PROCESSING 122932 SPARNLETT3 DRINKING VAIER 32010.76 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS 122533 STAMEN 2 SFASSCFF FE 34.340.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.O.3-I1-92 ... 122934 VESTALLCY INC 961.96 MELDING SUPPLIER 122935 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS INC s1.866.90 MECHANICAL PARTS ';. X 122936 SPEX INDUSTRIES INC $520.34 LAB SUPPLIES _- 122937 STARLITE RECLAMATION 3107.49 TRUCK PARTS 122938 STATEVICE INSTALLERS 9750.00 LAB EQUIPMENT MOVING • GO 122939 STERLING ART $269.83 OFFICE SUPPLIES --.122940 SUMMIT STEEL $104.13 STEEL ._ .....__. W 122941 SUNSET FORD $45.51 TRUCK PARTS 122942 SUPELCO INC $885.60 LAB SUPPLIES ..1 . 122943 TAYL CR-OUKA MFG CO PP ANY f56T.6] ELECTRIC CART PARTS " CT 122949 TN[YFSCK ]N[LS TP IAL SUPPLY f9.923.66 HARDWARE - 1 322945 TCNY•5 LECH G SAFE SERVICE $180.02 KBYS 6 LOCK REPAIR _ ._._...12294E TOYS LANDSCAPING CO 33.814.37 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.11-33-91._._.' 122947 TRANSMATICN INC $591.31 INSTRUMENT 122910 TRUCK L RUTC SUPPLY INC $1.571.67 TRUCK PARTS 122949 TVIKIKG LABCRATCRIES OF 335.00 LAB SERVICES _ 1225`.L US ALTO GLASS [ENTERS 5346.4E TRUCK PARTS 121951 ULTRA 5CIEKTIFIC $45.00 LAB SUPPLIES - 122952 UUDCAL $33.92 UNLEADED GASOLINE J 127953 UNITED PARCFL SERVICE $693.61 PARCEL SERVICES •I 122954 UAT TED REFROCR AP MI CS 3573.01 PRINTING - 1225!'- UNITEC STATES ELEVAIER CORP $1.105.50 SERVICE AGREEMENT 1 1229'_b VVR SCIEN71FIC $10.412.60 LAB SUPPLIES 121111 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO $4.069.04 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 122958 VANIER BUSINESS FCRMS $20.096.32 PRINTING 12P95S VARIAN ANALYTICAL IFSIRUYEKTS $1.610.09 LAB SUPPLIES Ali 12296C VERTEX SYSIEYS 3780.06 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 122961 VIKING IN CUSTNIAL SUPPLY $69.16 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES _ 1 122962 VILLAGE NURSERIES $94.77 LANDSCAPING 122963 VOLLERP SAVAGE A ASSOC 9243.75 INSURANCE CONSULTING FUND NC 5199 . JT GIST L(PMING CAPI7AL PROCESSING DATE 6/10/92 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 LGUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID U6/17/92 POSTING DATE O6/17/92 -UARRAN7 PC. YENC CP AMOUNT DESCRIPTION --- - 122964 RATER ENVIRONFEN7 FED. $154.95 PUBLICATION 122965 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $41,831.01 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.6-8-90 1229E6 JCHN WILEY A ECNS INC $179.50 PUBLICATION 122967 - WILLCAN ASSCCIAIES 3656.08 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-9-R1 1229E8 WE TEE SCIENTIFIC. 3387.90 LAB SUPPLIES 122969 HERON CORP $13.)24.14 COPIER LEASES 122970 G70RGE YARDLEY CO $55.30 HARDWARE 122971 GECRGE YAPELEY CC $542.41 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 122972 21EBARTP 4 ALFER/C.S. ALFEP 359.695.00 CONSTRUCTION P2-42-1 • 122973 ZIEBARTH PRO ALPER 313.788.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-34-1 '14 _ ----------------- TOTAL CLAIMS PAID U6/17/92 $3,594,510.59 4 _. SUMMARY AMOUNT - - X X1 OPER FUND $230.82 #2 CAP1,020.00 17O 42 PERPFUND ND $16,082.32 �.. X2 CAP PAC FUND $437.36 . X3 OPER FUND $17,709.00 OU X3 CAP FAC FUND $1,915.00 1 X5 OPER FUND $1,517.38 N 05 CAP PAC FUND $16,941.50 - X6 OPER FUND $158.42 X7 OPER FUND $5,361.63 X7 CAP FAC FUND $32,231.39 - - -- ---- X11 OPER FUND $7,605.02 X13 OPER FUND $47.65 024 OPER FUND $64.52 A X14 CAP FAC FUND $17,933.45 it X5&6 OPEN FUND 459.51 X6&7 OPEN FUND $2,935.42 X7&I4 OPER FUND $86.33 JT OPER FUND $800,590.70 CORF $2,358,082.96 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $104,118.97 JT MORNING CAPITAL $209,481.05 ------------------- $3,594,510.59 1 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitallon Dlthlets P.O. Box 8127.10944&It Avenue of Orange County,Calfforala fountain Valley.CA 9272"127 Telephone:(714)%2-2411 JOINT BOARDS AGENDA WE.DNESDAY. AUGUST 12, 1992 - 7 : 30 P.M. RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 A minute excerpt has been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item No. 4, it is appropriate to receive and file said excerpt: DISTRICT 1 (4 ) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpt `—' from the Costa Mesa Sanitary District re appointment of alternate Director for the August 12, 1992 meeting only: District Active Director Alternate Director 1 James A. Wahner Nate Reads `wg d/�a f i ,.W DrFIC EE D. RourLe & Woodr�. d' D."P P DL iEAAT A ADrca .rn..sCI.AL cox .. axc Ra l sse->000 COO.O G. vawwlNaioN IPCS�Mne CNI eJa11e> SEPN W.rowBPTN SUITE 7000 'IS C.RIIPCT TOI SOU TM PARKER STREET CPS OMAMG E. CALIFORNIA 98666 �>AC RVMLI NN WRITEN'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER D ETTY C.MRDUD1. TwOMPS r xIAON .Mcs o.R0.RAE (714) 564-2605 N R.... N NPRO R..A.T.I.. P.MCK x.SPwPDLIN PT TB x CAS TNOMA.1,..DAur. July 21, 1992 Honorable Sam Farr Member of Assembly - Chair, Assembly Local Government Committee 3210 State Capitol Sacramento, Ca. 95814 Attn. : Mr. Randy Pastor, Local Government Committee Consultant Re: Assembly Bill 3476 (Burton) �cB►� Dear Randy: In furtherance of our telephone conference of July 17, 1992, 1 submit herewith materials relating to the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, in conjunction with those materials forwarded to you by B. Richard Marsh, Esq. , General Counsel for the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, California. As you will discover from a review of the brief summary materials I provide, the Orange County Sanitation Districts have been organized pursuant to the County Sanitation District Act since 1950, and the 9 wholly independent, separate Districts, operate pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 4840 for the joint ownership, construction, operation and administration of the treatment works and related facilities. As a practical matter, the general public and all of the persons that the Districts deal with in any capacity on a daily basis, actually think of the 9 Districts as a single District, with their single administrative headquarters being located in Fountain Valley. Page Two July 21, 1992 Section 12 of Assembly Bill 3476 proposing to amend Government code Section 54954, would pose a uniquely undue burden upon our Districts and the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts. The Bill, as drafted, would require each of the Districts to conduct several meetings, thus increasing significantly the direct costs of conducting several extra meetings in the form of Directors' fees, notices, publications, consultant fees, etc. It would really serve no meaningful purpose, and the Bill, as enacted, is certainly not deemed necessary to cure any purported ills. We would therefore urge that you recommend to the Committee a revision to the existing language of Government Code Section 54954 in accordance with the language contained in Mr. Marsh's letter. We stand ready to respond to any questions that you may have. Very truly yours, OURKE & WOODRUFF erg r" r 10, Thomas L. Woodruff General Counsel i nW.pllWn cc: William D. Mahoney, Joint Chairman Evelyn Hart, Vice Joint Chairman Boards of Directors J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager ARTICLES Joint Operation §4840. Authority to execute agreement: Participation in State Employees' Retire- meat System §4841. Contents of agreement §4842. Provision for payment of tests, etc §4843. Contracts for joint acquisition, construction or use of sewage facilities § 4840. Authority to execute agreement: Participation in State Em- ployees' Retirement System Whenever two or more sanitation districts find and declare by resolution adopted by their respective district boards that it is for the interest or advantage of the districts to do so, the districts by their respective district boards may enter into an agreement for the mainte. nance of a centralized and joint administrative organization to care for the general administration of the affairs of each of the districts, and the construction, supervision, operation, and maintenance of the work of each of the districts, and for that purpose the districts may agree to employ the same engineers, surveyors, counsel, and other persons needed to carry out the purposes of the districts. Such agreement may also provide for participation by said sanitation districts in the State Employees' Retirement System of the State of California and for the payment of apportionments of costs and the collection, receipt and distribution of pension payments by one district desip,ated for the purpose and acting on behalf of all districts participating in the agreement in the same manner as provided by Sections 4841 and 4842 of this code. When the agreement so provides, the designated district shall have all the powers and perform all the duties of a public agency for the purposes of the State Employees' Retirement Law, both in respect to the joint officers and employees of the participating districts and in respect to the officers and employees separately employed by the participating districts. Enacted 1939; Amended Stars 1945 ch 490§1. Prior Law:Stan 1923 eh 250§ 19a,u added by Stats 1927 eh 178 § 1 p 324. Amendments: 1945 Amendment:Added the second paragraph. Cron References: Public employees retirement system:Gov C§§20000 at seq. Joint sanitation project:Gov C§§55000 at seq. Collateral References: Cal Jur 2d Drains and Sewers § 12. ' r MEEnNO DATE 8/12/92 TIME 7:30 P.M. DWMCTS 1,2,3,5,6,7, 11, 13614 DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS (RICHARDSOM ASPIlET . . . . . IBEYEAI. .. . . . . ... .. . . .BMREM... . (DEYER) . . . . . BARRERA. . . . ... . ... .... .G1LIN .. ...y/ (PoHOUs) . . . 9IE:1101E41 . . (SOOR) .. . .... . .. ..... (Ran-II . . . . . . SiWIK31K. .. . (PLUMMER) . ........ . . CO%. .. .... — (READEI . . .. . MWRIA . .. . MAM . ..... .... ......CIAVER .... _— �� DIBTRICTP (BEW ... ...... . .... ..DENIES .. . — IOULLL<5gJ1 . . WEDM .... . NELSON . ....... ... . . .DIMIAP . (SOOTY) H) COWNS . ... (HUNER) ... . .... :: ,MALE . . ... — EI VER) . . . . . SARREIIA.... (RICE) ......... . .... ..EYANB ..... MJRBY) . . . . . CATLW . ... . :. .ROM (BELL)(SELL) . . . . DAMES . .. o'kWHEI .... ........ . .ORIFRN.. ...,G (FLORA) . .. . . DIENES Y .. . (RICNARDSON.. . ... ... . .ORIIA, .. ... .. (CULVERT .. . . MAN. . (WEDAA) . ... .... ... . ..OULLRSON .. (PARKER) . . . . A. . ....� (PLUMMEN . .... ..... .. .HART . .... . . — (TMEST . .... NEWTWV . .. . McWIISTElD . .. ... . . .. .NMLY. .. ... — (HUMERI ... . FCKLER — OORMY) .. . ...... ..............MMAAHONEY ..... (oRISET) . . . . I'MIDO . . .. . (CULVER) . .. . . MAW, .. . . . (ROTH) . . . . . . 8iAMN. (NCHARDSON.. ... .. ... .M N . — — _ . .. — DISTRICTS (HERMMI). . ... . . . .... ..NWEREO ... — (DOTSON . .. . BAPIMI . . .. . (PARKS). NELSON. ... .. .. .... ..NELSON ... . — (NE13WR .. . . DUNLAP. .... IIYN6) . ...... . . .... . .NEWTON . .. . _ (NDRSYI . ... . CARW . .... (ME) . . .. .. .. . . .... . .PARKER . .. . (SCOTT . . .. . COLLINS . ... IAOE) . . .. ... . . .. ... . .PMITN .. ... _ MAIM . . ... . CULVER. .. . . (HURTER) . . .. . ... .... . KUMME ... . (RICE) . . .... EVNMS . . . .. CHART. . . .. . .... .... . .RUNMMi . . . w/ MPHIXiEY) . . . GLOM.. . ... IPUCKETt) . .... .. .. ... .PDMIWB . . . I+ MCCUNE) . . . . ORIFFW. .... (SXTARELLD.. . . .. . . .. . .PUO(ETT. .. . _.. (MRSYME) . . . LAsno . .... IOmeEO .. .. ... ..... ..PULIDO . . . . . — (AICHARDSCN MaDUOAN ... (PIAIDO) . ...... . .... ..RICHARD& _ (HERMAN . . . . MPIEII. ..... (STAM@4 . ........... .ROAN . . .. . . _ (AOE) . . . ... . PAMW . . ... (PONROUS)...... ..... . .SALTAREW — (HUNTER) . . . . PKBLLEfl . ... (CW9 .. ... . . . . . .. .. . .SANSONE . ..� (RCSRAILL .. XVA .. . ... (WT80......... . .. .. ..WIEN . . . .. — (ROTN . ..... sEM�1L. ...� (HAMMOND). . ... .... ... .SHERI)AN . .. — (SATES) . ... . mm . . ... _ _ MWITAELEI .. ........ ..SILVA . . ... .� — DISTRICTS IRO'. . .. .. . .... ... . .STANTON... . A� (HART) . . . .. . ....AkePLWMER. MILLES) �.��.�. �.,C.�.�. .�.�. �. .8WN1 . ... )COX) ... .... SANSOYE. ..._L/ (SATE( .SriVIA .. . Rfll FAD .WEIVA . .... (STAND)... . . ROTH .. . ...JG (OULLE(8ON . . . . . . . . . . . .WEDM . . ... DISTRICT DAOMTOWPARERSON . . . . .WWCHUL . . . � — (SHERRICKI . . . — (PLWMER) . . . HART . . . . .. STAFF OTHER BriVESTER.. .. . . WOODRUFF . . DISTRICT 7 BROWN . .. . ... . ANwAfl . . ... (SALTARELLD . . PUCKER . ...JG ANDERSON. . . .. . DEMIR. . .. . . (RERDE) . . . . . WAMNRh. ... CUWBON... .... FlEMIHO ... .— (BEYER) . . .. . BAPREM. .. . MINES . ...... . HOHENER II (PLWMER) . . . COX . . . . . . . SORMCA . ... . . HOWH . . . .. — (PULIDOI . . . . . RICHARDSON y HASENSTAS . . . . . HOWARD ... .— (STANTOM. . . . ROT) . . . . . .. HOMES .. . .. XUNT . . ... .— I D � KB MMMOND) . . . sHEPIDAN . . . E.. .... ... DISTRICT11 LWOER .. .. ..:: LEE . . .. ... bo� MOULTON- NGLLOR .. .. ... . LINDSTROM PATTERSOM . . WPlCHELL . . . NELSON. .... ..: = LWioN . . ...— Me STER) KELLY . . . . . . NICHOLS .... .. SHAW. .... .— (ROTH) . . . . . , BMNTCII . . . . OOTEN .. .. ... . .4A1— STONE .. . . . RENESCU. I. .. . . WASON. . ... DISTRICT. . . . 5MP90N . .. . .. . �G YOU/�; (WEDAA) . . I . I S �/]ft1AJ (BUYER) . . . . . ..E . ...JG RT MALE AL VWCEM ... .... (HUN TER) . . . . EHPLE. . . .. .$ ( . . . . PARKER. . .. w1� (STANTON)SYPHO . . . . ROTH . . . .DISTRICT 16 MILLER) . . . . . SWAN . . . .. . �GG4QG✓ �[,W (BUCKET. . .. . EkRRERA ($EVEN . . . . . BARREN.... [' V� (iMMMONDI . . . Sr1ERIDAN . . . A/ _ 8-13.BY PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY August 12, 1992 BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION7FIRM Please Print Please Print CW/,Ji5pp2 df a2emex REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BARD MEETIN . �./ A DETERMINED.BY .THE HAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION AND REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: �02" Z AGENDA ITEM NO. x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x NAME: (PLEASE PRINT) 7"�o�RC- s. --7:R7-T'KE HOME ADDRESS: �LOwE2 7�/2 NUMBER STREET /✓EwPo2 r 13sAlellt-/ cA 42 6 6 0 �{,( ITY ZIP C DE TELEPHONE: •"7/ n//y" �20 "�6 �G �'/�le 7� �'�J3 REPRESENTING: alzOA/4 de 1'JAe eo/rIM EI !L SELF OR NAME OF ORGANIZATION F28A MEEnka DATE 8/12/92 TIME 7:30 P.M. UBTFgM 1,2,3,5,6,7.11, 13844 JWS DISTFWTI JOINT BOARDS . LSPISET (BEYER) . . . . ... ....... . BRNEPo . . . . . P40FAM. ..--.......—"" (PONTORIM . . . SAIT-1111441 (=Tr)... ........... .COLLINS (Rum . . .. . . STANIKOIl. .. .✓V fPLIMNER). ........... .001(. .. . .... . . (mum . . . . . wAHHm, . . . . v x" .. .......... ...Cam . .. DISTRICT2 (BELL) .. ............ . .DENES . . ...— — — (NELSOM .......... .. ..DW . . . .. (aftumsom . WEDAA . . .. .— — — OfJNMM........ .. .. . ENKE . . . . .— ISCOTT) - MUM . . .. (RICEI . . ........ ... . . EVANS . . . . .MEYER) . . . . . SARRERA. .. . V RAHONEY) "BY) . . . . . CATLIN . .. . . V ftCME) . . .. ....... . ..QW . . . . . (81U) . . . . . . DENES . .. (PLO") . . . . . � .::=— (FuCHARCsoNq ... .... ... �Gmrr.. .. .— — — (CmvEm . . . . MR. ...... v (NEON)) . . . . ...... ..GiuuSsoR (PARKER) . . . . N�. ... .— — — (PL�Em . . . . . ....... . .... .— — — MYNES) . . . . . NEWTON PVSrm ....... ... .Idilly......— — — P1U M) . . . . RORSVTHE) . . ......... . ...... . . (GRISET) . . . . . SS--) ... .... ........ ,NCWvw (MVER) ... . ..........MAN ......— — — VIOTH) . . .. . . FAiRiew. .. . (RICHARDSON) ... ........lillioODIGIAN P[STRLC'r3 04ERMW.... .... .... ..ARNIM.. ... .. . . (DOTSON) . .. . . . .. . . (PARKER) . ........... ..MSC)k (NELSON) ... . DBSAP..... v (TYNES) .............. .NEWVDN NOW . ... . CKRM . ... . PUNLAII . ... .... ..... .FAIDGER jSCOTTj . ... . comme . . .. (AGE) . . . ... ... ...... .PARTIN (MASS . .... . MVER. ... . MUNTER) ........ ...... (RICE) . . ... . WANG .... . . MART). . .... ....... . ..lkUAMER WHONEV) T KSTT) . . . .. .... ... (wCulm . .. . Gmpqm... .. f. (SALTAFAUS.. .. ..... (PORSME) . . . �O . ..... psmen .. .. ........ . .mw . . . ... . . (RlcHAmsom iwSRRGAIN ... (I'MIDO) . ........... . .RICHARDSON .— MERMAN) .. . wmm...... (STANTON) ............ I ROTH . . .. . .— — — (AGE) . . . . . . . PARTIN ..... (PON17 OA...... . ..... .aALTAREul . . (HUNTER) ... . PICK EH .... V (Cox) .......... .... ..SANsoie (RCENTARAJD .. MVA ...... v (DOTSOM........ .... ..smaDi .. .. .— — — (BOTH) . .. . . . Immom....—V (HAmmoom......... ... — (BATES) . . . . . Mm ..... V (ROBITALLE) .......... . .IRLVA . .. .. .— — — DISTRICT5 (ROTH) . ...... ... .... STANTON. . . .. — — G. (MUM). . . . . .. . . I .. . . LMAN. . . . . .. . . (HART) . . .. . . (RATES) . . . . . . . . . . .. . . SYLVIA . . . . .. . . (cox). . . .. .. sANscmE.... V MUNTON). . . . ROTH . .. . .. V (GLUMSONI) WINCH DISTRICTS (NORS.T�PAMRSOM . . . . ,WINCHELL ISHERAICK) WANNER . — -/ (KMMEM HART . . . . .. STAFF CITHEA (STANTON).. . . ROTH . .. . .. SnVESM..... . WCODFU� DIsnKcT BROWN ....... . ANWAR .. . . . (SAILTARE114 . PLICKErr . . .. ANDERIAN!..... . (READE) VIAHMI, DELfln. .. . . . �WSON...... . R-EMlw (BEYER) . . . . . BAIL. ... DAWES ........ HCHENER (K�mm . . . cac .. .. ... .;, — — GORC2 CA..... . NotiaH .. .. . (PWDO) . . . . . RICHARDSON ✓ HASENSTAB ..... HOWARD....— (STANTO". . . . ROTH . .. . . . V Homes ....... HIJNT . ..... ftAMMOND) . . . smimmoAi KYLE. . ........ MCI;* ... DISTRMT11 LNom .... ... . LEE . -..... NOMTO4 NELSON ...... . . LINDSTR011 PATTERSON) . . WINCI ... V NELSON. ....... LYNCH ..... R.ALLAITER) AEUY ....... SHAW. ..... MOTH) — . . . : smam COTEN . . .. ..1 . STONE .... . AENESCU... ... . WASCH. .... DJURICT 1 SINIPSON ....... YOUNG ..... rWEDAA) , - - - -OWAIN20117 Slam........ ftY m . .. . . SARI.. .._Z/ VNcENT ... .... DRJNTm . ... . ... r- WINSOR.... .... PUNLAM . . . . EAGILER .... (STANT014. . . . ROTH . .. ... DISTFWT14 MILLER) . . . . . MAN ......✓V (PWKErn . . . . pON110UB ...✓V (REYER) , . . . . BARRED,.... (STANTON). . . . ROTH . .. ...✓V wmmoNo) . . . %HMm:,AR • 8/12/92 JOINT BOARD MEETING NOTES �� 84 - Receive and file minute excerpts JC: We have a motion and a second. Any opposition? Seeing none, it will be deemed approved. I would like at this time to have Nate Reade, Alternate to District Nos. 1 and 7 and Dick Sherrick, Alternate to District No. 6 to come up to the front. As is customary, we always give all members that sit on the Board of Directors a pin and I 'd like to present each of you one of these and hope that you will wear it with pride. N5 - Public Comments JC: Is there anyone in the audience that would like to address the Boards this evening on any matter? I do have one gentleman that wishes to address the Boards, Royal S. Radtke. He is the President of the Board of Directors for the Corona del Mar Chamber of Commerce. Mr. Radtke, if you would like to come forward. ROYAL S. RADTKE: Mr. Chairman and members of the Sanitation Districts Board, I am the President of the Corona del Mar Chamber of Commerce and as all of you are aware, we have had a sewer project going through the center of Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) through our business community. I am here on behalf of the Chamber of Commerce, on behalf of Bank of America, which is located on the corner of Marguerite and PCH, and also as a resident of Newport Beach. What I am here for is something that you don't hear alot of and that is to compliment the Sanitation District on the wonderful job that you have done in putting sewer lines through Corona del Mar. I think in this case alot of credit Is due to Mr. Tom Dawes, Phil Sansone, but probably more than anybody, alot of credit goes to the head Engineer of the project, Mr. Charlie Gabbard. That gentleman has gone far beyond what was required of him to do as the Engineer for the project, as has the other members of the project. We started several years ago anticipating the sewer project. Our Chamber of Commerce formed a committee called, Construction Impact Committee. We met on a regular basis with the Irvine Company, the Sanitation District and city officials. During that time we were able to put our complaints, our concerns before these members and ask for solution of problems which we knew were going to occur. What we ended up doing was publishing a newsletter called "The Pipeline". The purpose of that was to inform all the businesses in the Corona del Mar business district of just what exactly was happening with the sewer project on a regular basis every month. That communication, I believe, did more than anything else possibly could have done to help our merchants survive this very extensive project. As you know any me there is construction on PCH, Corona del Mar suffers, getting alot of amplaints from residents about this or that; for example, pieces of rock fitting their car, pieces of highway which were going into the drain. But to very honest with you, we do not feel that came from the sewer project. We did not have those problems until the Laguna Beach water line went into our community. The cooperation we received from the Sanitation District was far better than what we received from the Laguna Beach Water District. I have to say that Tom Dawes took the time to come to our early 7:30 a.m. meetings and Charlie Gabbard, as did the mayor. They listened to our complaints and to our possible remedies and they listened to alot of sour grapes from people in -1- our community. When we look at the project overall , we have to say that the Sanitation District has done one of the best jobs that could have possibly been done. There were some cases of backup of traffic on PC b t was expected. One of the things that I was going to commend the nt ation District was a N , memorandum of understanding which ogre a e sewer construction through Corona del Mar would not begin until leph Hill Road (?) which is now Newport Coast Drive was in place. Because of at road being in place many cars were diverted around Corona del Mar which allowed a normal flow of traffic through Corona del Mar. There were situations, of course, which weren't anticipated such as, there were huge boulders and rocks. When it became apparent that that problem existed, Charlie was there immediately as was Mr. Dawes to help us explain to our merchants. It was explained to them what was happening, keeping them informed and helping them by a series of sidewalk sales which encouraged the residents to purchase from our merchants which kept them in business. I only know of two businesses of all of our 250 some members that actually closed during the construction period. In research their closure was not due to the sewer project. What I am basically here to say is, I would like to congratulate the Sanitation District, on my behalf of Corona del Mar Chamber of Commerce for the wonderful job you did in keeping our community together, in keeping our merchants alive and in business, and as for as myself is concerned, for keeping my bank open. As you know, when there is a problem like that on Coast Highway most people tend to change their normal traffic route and once they change that, it is very difficult to get those people to come back to the community but through the cooperation of Mr. Dawes, the mayor and the Engineer of the project we have not lost our community patrons. Thank you for your splendid work and we are saved. Congratulations[ JC: Thank you, Mr. Radtke. I can say as Directors it is good to have someone come and give those kinds of ------ We feel that we have the best as for as the staff and the people that run this operation but it is good to see that people recognize it outside of the operation. N6(b) - Report of the General Manager JWS: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. As you all are painfully aware, the "Budget Olympics" still are going on in Sacramento. There are currently two proposals on the table that would affect the Sanitation Districts. One is called the Super Pot. Under this proposal , (I think you've probably heard of it) the tax revenue from all special districts in the state would be put into a big pot and that totals up to $1.6 and $1.7 billion. Then 25% of that would be appropriated for the schools and the balance would be put into a separate pot and distributed in the same manner as special district augmentation funds are currently distributed in each county. The alternative is a proposal to take 25% to 30% right off the top of enterprise special districts tax revenue, in our case 25% of our $35+ million (would be just under $9 million) and give that to the schools and then we would keep the rest. Obviously, we prefer the later proposal . Last month I told you that the proposal to shift special districts property taxes to the school districts was off the table. Obviously, it's back on the table and it is our belief now that we are going to be hit in some way. It looks like somewhere between 25% and 100% but the real problem, as you know, we �J -2- ,collect our user fees on the property tax bills. The real problem is once we find what Sacramento does and its impact on us, the Boards will have to meet immediately to consider adjusting the user fees to make up the shortfall. The real problem is as we collect this on the tax, we are required to provide the Information for each parcel that the fee is levied against within our service area to the County Auditor by August 24, and the clock is ticking. If we don't find out within the next couple of days, we' re not sure how we'll be able to �..i make up that shortfall . There is a normal procedure for the Boards to adjust the fees. As you recall you took an action back in April declaring your intent not to adjust the fees because we were holding the line on the budget. There is a normal procedure for adjusting the fees whereby the Boards holds two hearings, at least a week apart. It has to be published and then there is a 30-day waiting period for it to be effective. There is language proposed in the event this shift takes place that would allow the Boards to meet in a single session and adopt an adjustment to the fee without the waiting period, without the notice other than the regular notice required to hold a meeting required under the Brown Act. Tom, I know you were at a CASA Board Meeting. Do you have anything to add to this status? TLW: Very little but I did understand that Assemblyman Sam Farr is scheduled to present an amendment to the Big Five group this evening and he feels that hopefully it will go the floor tonight relative to the idea that Wayne had eluded to and that being instead of taking 100% of our money, keeping 25% for schools and letting the Board of Supervisors send it back to us. In lieu thereof, the state would take 25% to 30%, or they would take 100% and send 25% to 30% to the schools and send the rest directly back to the Districts. Then it would not go back through for discretionary dispersal by the county. That is apparently going to happen tonight. Mike Dillon, the Executive Director of CASA was working on it this morning and appears that is where it is headed. \/ DIRECTOR WEDAA: I guess one of the things you just said now that I find very interesting is that the state will essentially. help us speed up this process. I think it's very important that we're going to go through some kind of process. I understand that this is not our doing; this is somebody else's doing and it' s been forced upon us. We in turn have to force it upon them and we have to watch that process and make it more workable and meaningful than the normal route under these circumstances. DIRECTOR CATLIN: If the legislature can waive the constitution by not ---- the budget, is there any reason why we at the other end can't do the logical thing and take our time to raise this instead of sticking to the rules? TLW: One of the practical things is we' re not in control ; our money is controlled. The collection of our money is controlled by the county offices and the tax collector's office and they' re the ones that put the bills. They control the computer runs, etc. We have to get them the raw data, get them the tapes. It works somewhat at their mercy. I would tell you, I think Wayne and Gary could comment, they have indicated an extraordinarily good level of help and cooperation. They have been very sympathetic. -3- AS: Actually, we're supposed to provide them with the information by August 10th}which was Monday but we've been talking to them. We' re not the only special di strict in the county that has this problem so other people are talking to them as well . They've extended that to the 24th of AugustVvnd that at this point is the "drop dead" date. We give them the information y computcr tape and then they have to incorporate into the system. They are anxious to get the tax bills out early in September. DIRECTOR CATLIN: We're caught between the rock and the hard place and the legislature apparently doesn't care. We' ll catch the flack from the public. DIRECTOR FLORA: Is it possible to set up another meeting now to satisfy the notice requirements? If we don't have a quorum, the meeting{ off anyway. .B- DIRECTOR SWAN: We can adjourn to another date. Adjourn to a date specific that is not a regular meeting and then have the Secretary adjourn it to another meeting to keep this meeting on. JWS: That is an excellent idea. To follow-up on that, I would suggest that we probably adjourn to next Wednesday, August 19th. DIRECTOR MAIN: Mr. Chairman, if all this fails, is there an alternate plan to make up this shortfall? Is there a possibility of billing in-house? JWS: Not really. That would take a considerable effort to develop the system, buy the hardware, buy the software, actually generate and debug the system and get it billed. Next year would come around which would be the next opportunity, probably before we could do that. DIRECTOR SWAN: Last year inadvertently someone messed up in one of the communities of Irvine and didn't get their tape in on time. What they came up with was a supplemental tax bill that came out a week or so after the regular tax bill. Virtually everyone in the County is going to have to cane up with a supplemental tax bill to share a pro rats in the run and it will come out after the regular tax bill . I think that's what is going to have to happen. JWS: That will certainly focus attention on the issue. There is a supplemental roll that goes out and Gary has been discussing that with the County Auditor's. I think what you're referring to, Director Swan, is probably something different than the regular annual supplemental roll because they have indicated to us that they didn't believe it was legal to assess this charge on the regular supplemental roll that is issued on a regular basis annually. DIRECTOR SWAN: Last year they goofed and they didn't get it out in time for the regular tax bill , so they put it out another supplemental tax bill . JWS: The rules are interpreted depending on who's goofed. DIRECTOR SANSONE* When we were afraid they were going to take the whole thing, the guess was that the increases would be 70-1004. On ,a1 A---- scenario -----7 W C� -4- JWS: You're right; the original proposal was to take all $35 million and depending on your district 1t would range from about 40% in District No. 1 to about 140% in District No. 5. The average of the seven districts that have property taxes would have been about 70%. If they take roughly a quarter of our tax revenue instead of 100% then you could figure it would be roughly a quarter of the orginal estimate. DIRECTOR SANSONE: Are we sure we're going to get the other 75%? JWS: Right now we're not sure of anything. DIRECTO`�R SANSONE: If the 25 - 75 scenario goes, does the 75 go back to the County? JWS: There are two different proposals on the table. Under the "Super Pot" proposal It would go to the County and the County would distribute it similar to the way they distributed SDAF funds now. By the way, we don't get SDAF funds. If you go back to Propostion 13 without belaboring that, we never participated In that because we didn't take bail-out funds at the Sanitation Districts. But what I think I just heard Tom say, on the alterate proposal it could go either way, either they could just let us keep the 75% or another possibility is that they would give that 75% to the County to distribute. Is that right, Tom? TLW: That is correct. DIRECTOR SANSONE: ---- TLW: The proposal that is presently on the floor would be approved, then the 75% would go from the State to the County and then the County Board of Supervisors would have the discretion as to who gets it. That would have to enter into your thinking as to where to set the fees, unless prior to enacting our ordinance we some way got absolute commitment from the County that they �../ would return zero or 100% of the 75. If the new proposal is enacted then we will have some precise numbers to deal with. JWS: Just briefly, there are two other items. Under our NPOES permit conditions, the U.S. EPA and the Regional Water Quality Control Board requires us to submit an annual report of our activities. This is the annual report for 1991. Last week or early this week you should have received an Executive Summary of that report. This is the second year that we have published this Executive Summary. If you haven't had a chance to read it, I would urge you to do so. I think you will find it Interesting and informative and if you have any questions, please call us. If you would like additional copies, we have those available too. Finally, as you know, as a part of our public outreach program, we have been participating in the Orange County Fair for the last couple of years. We were out there for the full duration of the fair this year. Many of you stopped by and saw our booth. One of the things, if you did stop by, was we had an interactive computer system where people were able to sit down and take a little quiz and if they answered the questions right, they got a prize. That turned out to be one of the high spots of the fair. We had people lined up 12 to 15 deep for 30 minutes waiting to take this test; all for a bucket. It was very successful and we were able to reach alot of people. That concludes my report, Mr. Chairman. -5- DIRECTOR KELLY: I hear that if there are options as to what Sacramento decides, •does the Districtslmanagement have any position on whether we have opportunity depending on how badly we get hit, on reducing the costs of our operation or fs all deficits going to be tacked on to the ----? JWS: You may recall when the Boards adopted the budgets this year, we did cut $54 millioy-from the prior year's budget. The Boards also held the line on all �..i the fees fact, you've already acted on the user fees and the sewer connectio fees and tonight there is an agenda item for those Districts that have annexation 7fees to do the same thing. The decision will be left up to the Board. I can tell you that if we get hit by the full $35 million, you could dig into your reserves to pay that. The question then becomes, it's kind of "pay me now or pay me later". We've discussed in great length as a part of our long— range financing program the need for those reserves and how they are used and what they do in terms of enhancing our credit ratings and so forth, the needs for construction because of long-term nature of these projects. As I told you beforelif the State Legislature and Governor in their wisdom decide to take our properrty tax revenue (I don't mean this to sound like it is))iat you will never have a better chance to lay it on someone else. If you wait to do it next year it's going to be just much more difficult to explain. This will ultimately be a decision that the Board will have to make and we will provide you with the necessary financial information as to the alternatives and the impacts. DIRECTOR KELLY: Then whether or not there will be additional attempts to reduce the cost of operation or ------ . JWS: Yes, we've discussed the cost cutting measures at considerable length during the budget process and as I indicated, you have already cut $54 million this year from the budget. I guess what I 'm saying 1s that it would be difficult to cut much more. DIRECTOR EVANS: It appears to me that we ought to check it out and take another look at the budget and see if there is anything we could turn ---. The �../ taxpayers are being hit from all directions and I think we should take another look and see if there are any areas that we can cut. DIRECTOR CATLIN: My view would be that a message should be sent back to the public to let them know who is causing this, that it's not our operation, it's the State Legislature. DIRECTOR SWAN: With all due respect to some of the comments here what happens when you pass this on -------------- JC: If we could wrap this up, there is no question we could sit here and debate It but I don't know exactly what we' re going to have to do until that budget is passed. We will leave the arguments about what we're going to end up doing and justifying what we are or aren't going to do until we know what the good old boys to Sacramento do to us. DIRECTOR ?: I appreciate what Buck said about trying to inform the public about the cause of the problem. It's not easy because when that bill hits their door, they're going to say we're tacking on more money. That is hard to get to the public. JC: You're right, this is nothing more than a shed on to local government and special districts to raise the tax. They trickle it down to the guy below you. -6- 19(d) - Purchase of Caustic Soda Solution, Specification No. P-133 DIRECTOR CULVER: I just wanted an explanation why on the caustic soda solution, District No. 3 is the only one to come up with $285,474.007 I'm sure there is a logical explanation. JWS: That's a good question. Years ago we were havingrconsiderable number of odor complaints along the route of the large trunk sewers in District No. 3 which is the western portion of the county. Some of them come all the way 4rom J�`( La Habra area and quite frankly, it takes 35-40 hours for some of that fstewater to trZel from the northern reaches of the county down to Plant No. 26 nd�also�quite frankly, it gets a little "gamey" on the way down. We hired a consultant engineer to do a study to determine how we could address that problem and the odor complaints we were getting. They recommended that we make caustic soda drops in the trunk sewe5 in the upper reaches to address the odor issues. It has worked dramatically well . District No. 3 is the only district with that problem and that is the reason that they' re the only district that has to buy that material for the trunk sewers. We did determine in the study that we also receive a benefit from adding those chemicals upstream. We receive a benefit at Plant No. 2 so District No. 3 actually uses a volume of chemicals that is greater than the $326,OOO,but we give them credit for the benefit that the plant (which is a joint Districts' facility) receives from that, so the costs are actually reduced for District No. 3. N9(h) - Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1 DIRECTOR COLLINS: The longer I stay in as a public elected official , the more suspicious I am becoming with change orders. This item is Change Order No. 12 which adds four items of additional work for approximately $52,000.00 for �./ Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1. It sights item 84 as being an obvious screwup of the designer and we will recover the costs of this screwup from the designer. It talks about item N1, 2 and 3 as being errors by the designer, using words as "correct errors and omissions that the designer costs in the specifications, consultant specified incorrect number amount of conductors, Incorrectly routed the number of wires". Item 82 was provided panels omitted from the contract documents. Item N3 talks about engine control panels omitted. All of these things to me represent a profound sloppy work ethic. The recommendation we have to the Board this evening is that the above described changes would have been included in the original work as designed if discovered and known and so therefore go ahead and pay them. I challenge that a little bit. I doubt that the cost involved of adding additional panels is going to be the same cost involved in purchasing 20 or 30 panels or whatever it was when . they did the first design work. I also would like to see the designers and consultants here penalized somehow, not just omitting what they have done for their sloppy work. This is a performance that should not be rewarded and should be penalized. I would also like to see somewhere along the line, the next time _ 5 these people come to bid with us, tha -remember—these_items_and hold it- against them in some fashion and ass s ng some kind of dollar valuation that goes on top of their bid. I believe is sloppy work and I hope that when we go back and make sure that we're not charged a price that is incrementally different than the price we would have gotten by ---- bid. I don't like to see it. On several change orders we've had here, this was the most glaring. It �../ just stuck out in my mind. -7- TMD: First of all , Director Collins is right. These are all omissions that should have been in the design contract and were not included. Basically, it is all wires and conduits. It totals some 6,000 feet of conduits and wires, modifying some 27 circuits, adding 27 junction boxes and all kinds of switches and controls that were omitted from the design contracts. It is a shame that it was omitted. In order to get the power to the lights we had to add conduits to bring the wire. Overall on this project, we're running a fairly low percentage of change order amounts but that doesn't excuse any one of them. This is a design omission and we didn't write in here to charge the consultant for it because had the consultant not made that omission and had these 6,000 feet of wire and circuit had been in the contract, it would have raised the bid price by an amount. I agree with Director Collins. It is very hard to say that this is the right amount. Had it been in the original contract, the unit prices for this probably would have been lower. It is very hard to say. If there is 200 junction boxes and we're adding 27, I'm certain that the prices that were bid two years ago for the 200 are cheaper than the prices we are able to negotiate today for the 27. That is a hard thing to quantify. The consultant did prepare the plans for this change at no cost to the Districts and I ' ll be happy to discuss the incremental increase with the consultant associated with this change. On item N4 we believe it is a consultant error and that is a difference and I 'd like to just explain the difference between what we call the omission works simply wasn't put in the job. On the error there were columns; this is a structural problem and there were columns shown to be square in the structural drawings. We were following the structural drawings and approving the rater that went into those columns. In the architectural drawings those columns were shown to be round and at that point, we thought that for the beauty of the building, we should change them to the round. We had to pay the extra cost of new rebar. Some of the rebar had been bent for the other columns and that's the $2,000.00. We believe the consultant should pay that and we will get that. As far as the incremental cost on the other three, we will try to get what we can from the consultant. We're disappointed; these things should not happen and I must apologize for it. That concludes my report, Mr. Chairman. DIRECTOR MAIN: Is the consultant like the guy that designed it? What's the procedure for checking what the designer designs to see that he designs it right? TMD: We plan check here with our own staff as best we can. These jobs are huge, complicated jobs. There are some 300 sheets on this job and these tray schedules, conduit schedules and wire schedules are very complicated. I think that we missed it; our staff missed it on our checking. On the other hand, we don't have a great amount of ability to plan check with the staff we have. We're trying to correct that in some ways. Right now, we' re designing a new pump station to be built by District Nos. 3 and 11 and we've actually gotten a second consultant to do the electrical plan check for us. We solicited three proposals for that and we got a good price and we gave that out because we didn't have the staff available to do it. We hope that will catch some of these errors. We' re looking at other projects at independent checks by a second team of consultants. -B- _ DIRECTOR CULVER: I don't know what the markup by Hunter Corporation was over what the electrical contractor had billed Hunter Corporation. Do we have a figure? TMD: Our specifications are very specific; the total markup for the subcontractor and the contractor is 15%. They can split it in any manner they choose. The labor is paid at state rates; the rates that they must in turn pay. �..i The materials are based on the invoice price. There isn't much room in a change order the way we calculate it for any profit. It barely covers the extra cost of the overhead. DIRECTOR CULVER: How do you check the invoice? Do you have someone that ---- and checks how much conduit per foot? TMD: Yes, we do for every conduit, every wire. DIRECTOR PARKER: What is the cumulative total of all change orders on this project? TWO: If you approve this change order, it would be $470,000. The contract is $15.4 million so it would be just under 3%. DIRECTOR RICHARDSON: In the future, could we see a cumulative total on these change orders so we can make our own assessment? JC: I believe they are in the package. TWO: I believe you would like it in the Manager's Report where you could assess it a little easier. We will do that. N14-Comments from General Counsel Prior to Closed Session TLW: There are four items I would like to review with you in closed session. Specifically, you have received from me a very brief memo on a recenmendation relative to a worker' s compensation claim for a Districts former employee. That Is the Sabino matter. Number two is I want to review a proposed settlement in the U.S. Government vs. Montrose Chemical and the Sanitation Districts. Number three is a proposed initiation of litigation against United Oil Company for damages incurred by the Districts as a result of activities of United oil Company in one of their facilities. Fourth, a consideration of recomnendation for authorization of r^qu4s!W litigation against the manufacturer and general contractor on our two jobs relating to the cogeneration combustion engines. CLOSED SESSION #28 - Purchase of Ca acit and Payment of Operational and Maintenance Charges re a ye t0 an oaqu n sPjannea t;onynuniEy IND: This item has a couple of things that have happened that I would like to explain. As you know about seven years ago, District No. 14 was formed. When It was formed, it was thought to have a -------- with District No. 5 so that the boundaries exactly touch. However, there was ----------, we can understand it. The formation was based along a line of a IRWD sewerage district as opposed to to their boundary in about 60 acres, the area shown in red here was left as an island. This area is located along San Joaquin Hills Road and where Newport Drive comes together. It's within an area of District No. 5 that was annexed to District No. 5 about 20 years. That is just„a little background. All this area that is now developing within Irvine is served by District No. 5 and west of the Upper Newport Bay is owned by both District No. 5 and 6. IRWD has requested that we take the flow from one large tract development of the new Irvine Company lands. It would have about 850 houses in this and is called San Joaquin Hills Planned Community. To do that, these homes which are in District No. 14 have to enter into an agreement with the owners of the conveyance facility. As a standard form agreement entered into between our Districts, between all Districts all over when joint facilities are in use, what it says is two things; if you need a certain capacity you pay for the passage and based on the capacity you buy, you pay for the annual maintenance and that is exactly what this agreement provides. It provides that District No. 14 would own 4-5% of the capacity in the conveyance facilities. On the lighted map over there, there is a ---- that is combined that shows that District No. 5 in the dark green at the bottom of the map and I put on the orange tape that doesn't show up at all . That is the number of miles of sewer that they would buy to ----- 4-5% capacity. The money would go to District No. 5 and to a smaller extent to District No. 6 because they own less than that covered by that line. �, Also as part of that agreement, there is a reimbursement to give IRWD some money that they previously gave to District No. 5. Prior to the development, we entered into an agreement with IRWD, whereas they prepay (among other conditions) connection fees for all the homes that are planned for the area. They gave a check to the Districts for $6 million. Plus that, they paid for sewer lines that are being constructed in Pacific Coast Highway. Some 509 of those homes that they already paid the money for are going to be built in this area. Because they are not going to be built in District No. 5, the agreement provides that that money be given back to them. The --- is that District No. 5 will pay IRWD $763,500.00. District No. 14 will pay District No. 5 $1.37 million so that District No. 5, over this contract, will have a net payable of $600,000. District No. 14 will pay District No. 6 $24,400. Mr. Chairman, staff recommends approval of this agreement. It provides an economical way to serve this area without IRWD being forced to build costly lines over to the Michelson Reclamation Plant. District Nos. 5 and 6 have adequate capacity within their existing conveyances to support this sale. That concludes my report, Mr. Chairman. -10- DIRECTOR SANSONE: That is in Newport Beach's sphere? Why should we turn over the responsibility for that to IRWD? The whole sphere that you' re talking about there is Newport Beach. TMD: The city --- a sphere of influence is not effected by this transaction. DIRECTOR SANSONE: It does when it Comes up to LAFCO of who provides water and who provides sewer. TMD: It's within IRWD; water and local sewer. Now this is regional sewer and this is really a flow exchange agreement between two Sanitation Districts. It's just a capacity issue within existing pipe lines. The island itself could be annexed to either Districts Nos. 5 or 14. It's best that it go into 14 for at least one reason and that is this, if it went into 5 today, District No. 5 would not receive a portion of the ad valorem tax although earlier that issue may become ---- in the future. That was to create a funding island that would be different than the rest of District No. 5. District No. 14 pays for the treatment of this water separately than property tax by sending a check directly to the Joint Works. From that standpoint, it's a little cleaner to have it in District No. 14. DIRECTOR: (Can't understand his comments.) TMD: The 2500 are already planned for in District No. 5. If there was a thought that maybe some other 14 ---- would sewer this way, they would have to come before this Board to do an exchange agreement, capacity agreement and at that time we would decide whether theere is capacity for it. We report to you tonight that there is capacity for this one issue. DIRECTOR SANSONE: ?? TMD: The figures go above of what IRWD previously paid for connection fees. They paid for more than 2500, I think 3400. (TAPE ENDED) -11- 1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS °Y of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 101W ELLIS AVENUE Va.Go.SI E7 FOUNTAIN VALIXV.CALIFORNIA 82728-8127 August 13, 1992 97141 OB24411 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Board Members District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 RE: Adjourned Meeting(s) to Consider and Act on State Budget Impact on Districts' Property Tax Revenues At the regular Joint Board meeting on August 12th, the Directors of District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and it adjourned to Wednesday, August 19, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. The purpose of the adjournment was to fix a meeting date and time at which the Boards could consider the fiscal impact on the Districts of any imminent budget agreement between the Governor and State Legislature, and to take whatever action deemed appropriate, including increasing the sewer use fees for 1992-93. The proposals currently on the table that staff and General Counsel reviewed with the Directors last night would take a portion or all of the above Districts' annual property tax revenues (up to $35.1 million) and shift them to the State to help balance California's budget. (Districts 13 and 14 are not affected because they do not now receive any property tax revenues.) The Boards adjourned to August 19th because of an uncertain, but hopefully imminent, agreement between the Governor and legislature on the budget, and the Increasingly tighter deadline (August 24th) for filing necessary information and computer tapes with the County Auditor to enable collection of the Districts' 1992-93 sewer use fees on the annual property tax bills. Adjourning to August 19th allows the Boards to satisfy the legal notice requirements and convene at the earliest possible moment to take action in the event a budget agreement is reached between now and August 19th. W COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT! .1 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 10944 ELLI9 AVENUE P.O.BON 9121 \ / FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92729-9127 Board Members 0141982.2411 Page 2 August 13, 1992 The meeting was set with the understanding that if a budget agreement is not reached before the 19th, the Board Secretary will contact each Director and advise you that the meeting will not be held on the 19th; and to further advise you of a rescheduled meeting date that she will fix, following the same procedure, in anticipation of when budget action might take place by the State. The Board Secretary has the legal authority to adjourn the meeting for lack of a quorum to a new date and time. Enclosed is the official notice of the adjourned meeting for Wednesday, August 19th. The Secretary will contact you prior to the meeting time to let you know whether or not this meeting is "on". If you will be difficult to reach by telephone, we would appreciate it if you would call late Tuesday, August 18th or early Wednesday, August 19th, for confirmation. In this event please call Penny Kyle or Mary Simpson, (714) 962-2411, Extention 2026 or 2029, respectively. In the meantime, if you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me. O/ J. !( "_ 1-r yne Sylvester/\/a General Manager JWS:mas Enclosure cc: Board Members, Districts 13 and 14 Board Secretary General Counsel 1IIT�TIp COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 927284127 he.iH 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 p14l 962-2411 August 13 , 1992 NOTICE OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 19, 1992 - 7:30 P.M. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 1 i Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of August 12, 1992, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3 , 5, 6 , 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, will meet in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date to consider and act on the State budget impact on Districts ' property tax revenues. ASAs i�B a cre y �1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954. 2, I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting on 19Qb was duly posted for public inspection at the An lobby of the Districts - offices on 19 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this �OJ4I day of 19!&. Penny Kyle,/qsslstjnt Secretary of each of thektoardsFof Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 , 11 , 13 & 14 of Orange County, California F27A.1