Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-05-13 �'gei�t/Ory p, J11iN ~be AJO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 II p4��'pF Cpp (714)962-2411 May 7 , 1992 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 WEDNESDAY, MAY 13, 1992 - 7 : 30 P.M. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. tart' Tentatively-Scheduled Upcoming Meetings: AD HOC COMITTEE RE - Wednesday, May 20th, at 4 : 30 p.m. LAND USE (immediately preceding Fiscal Policy Committee meeting) FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - Wednesday, May 20th, at 5 : 30 p.m. BUILDING COMMITTEE - Thursday, May 21st, at 5: 30 p.m. SPECIAL JOINT WORKS - Wednesday, May 27th, at 4: 30 p.m. SELECTION COMMITTEE ( immediately preceding the Executive RE OCEAN MONITORING Committee meeting) EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE/ - Wednesday, May 27th, at 5: 30 p.m. FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE SPECIAL JOINT WORKS - Thursday, May 28th, at 5 : 30 p.m. SELECTION COMMITTEE RE COMPUTERS DEBT FINANCING WORKSHOP - Wednesday, June 3rd, at 5: 30 p.m. COUNTY SANRATION DISTRICTS\ Af ORANGE COUNTY, CAUEONNIA 10900 EWS AVEWE VO.90X 8129 . MU TAIN VALM.LALRORNIA 9272M n+A�9,xx+1 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings May May 13, 1992 May 27, 1992 June Jun 10, 1992 Jun 24, 1992 July Jul 08, 1992 Jul 22, 1992 August Aug 12, 1992 None Scheduled September Sep 09, 1992 Sep 23, 1992 October Oct 14, 1992 Oct 28, 1992 November Nov 11, 1992* None Scheduled December Dec 09, 1992 None Scheduled January Jan 13 , 1993 Jan 27, 1993 February Feb 10, 1993 Feb 24, 1993 March Mar 10, 1993 Mar 24, 1993 April Apr 14, 1993 Apr 28, 1993 May May 12, 1993 May 26, 1993 * Holiday - New meeting date to be determined. BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P.O.Box 8127.10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County,California - Fountain Valley,CA 9272"127 Telephone:(714)962-2411 JOINT BOARDS AGENDA REGULAR MEETING MAY 13, 1992 - 7:30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California- Goverment Code Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda Stem are available for public inspection In the Office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2, or as set forth on asupplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call (3) DISTRICTS 1 7 6 14 �j Consi oration o motion to receive and file minute excerpt from the City of Tustin re election of mayor and appointment of alternate Directors, and seating new members of the Boards, as follows: (*Mayor) District Active Director Alternate Director 1 Thomas R. Saltarelli Leslie A. Pontlous* 7 Charles E. Puckett Thomas R. Saltarelli 14 Leslie A. Pontious* Charles E. Puckett (4) EACH DISTRICT Anna a ec ion of Chairmen and Chairmen pro tem of the Boards: (a) District 1 (b) District 2 (c) District 3 (d) District 5 (a) District 6 (f) District 7 (g) District 11 (h) District 13 (i) District 14 (5) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (6) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. i 5/13/92 (7) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel s present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. (a) Report of Joint Chairman (b) Report of General Manager (c) Report of General Counsel (8) EACH DISTRICT ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman: District 1 - April 8, 1992 regular. District 2 - April 8, 1992 regular District 3 - April 8, 1992 regular District 5 - April 8, 1992 regular District 6 - April 8, 1992 regular District 7 - April 8, 1992 regular District 11 - April 8, 1992 regular District 13 - April 8, 1992 regular District 14 - April 8, 1992 regular (9) ALL DISTRICTS Consiera won of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District. ) See pages "A" and "B" 4/08/92 4/22/92 ALL DISTRICTS J— outing Fund - 8 669,955.61 8 763,959.66 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund 911,968.60 3,537,778.24 Joint Working Capital Fund - 154,771.40 186,739.07 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 65,432. 36 114,535.93 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 435.00 360.48 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 801,996.54 7,212.75 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 86,934.83 35,139.67 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 848,477.95 170,616.26 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 23.87 245.76 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 170,526.22 5,999.37 DISTRICT NO. 11 - -0- 7,368.26 DISTRICT NO. 13 - -0- 63.84 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 1,780.75 4,409.57 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 6 6 JOINT - 24,248.68 1,467.79 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 8 7 JOINT - 2,933.48 -0- DISTRICTS NOS. 7 5 14 JOINT - 395.60 7,449.98 , 53,739,880.89 $4,843,346.631 / -2- a.► n 5/13/92 (10) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 10(a) THROUGH 10(m) All matters placed on the consent ca en ar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. The Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding Purchase of Two (2) Cab and Chassis, Specification No. A-159, to GMC Truck Center for a total amount not to exceed $30, 388.00 plus sales tax. See page "C" (b) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Hewlett-Packard Company in the amount of $30,440.00 plus sales tax for Purchase and Installation of Gas Chromatograph/Sulfur Chemiluminescense Detector System (Specification No. E-218) . (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-39, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of 12.5% Sodium Hypochlorite Solution, Specification No. P-131 (Rebid) , to Jones Chemicals, Inc. , for the delivered price of $0.44 per gallon, plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning May 14, 1992, with provision for four one-year extensions upon mutually-agreeable terms (Estimated annual cost $37 ,400.00 plus sales tax) . See page "D" ..► -3- Y 5/13/92 (10) ALL DISTRICTS = (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) r (d) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. to the plans and specifications for Central ../ Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, authorizing an addition of $58,902.00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation for two items of additional work. See page "E" (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 13 to the plans and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-19-2, authorizing an addition of $351,479.23 to the contract with Brinderson Corporation for nine items of additional work, including claims settlement, and granting a time extension of ten calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page "F" (f) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 20 to the plans and specifications for Gas Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-1, authorizing an addition of $10,548.00 to the contract with Ziebarth a Alper for two items of additional work. See page G" (g) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 9 to the plans and specifications for Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-3; Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PI-35-2; and Installation of Waste Digester Gas Flare Facilities at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-21, authorizing a net addition of $75,878 .00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. , for seven items of added or deleted work, and granting a time extension of nine calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page "H" (h) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-1, authorizing an addition of $46,087 .00 to the contract with Ziebarth 8 Alper and C. S. Alper Construction Co. , Inc. for five items of additional work. See page "I" -4- "� 5/13/92 i (10) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (i) Consideration of the following actions relative to �✓ Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design, construction support services and preparation of operation and maintenance manuals for Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43, providing for changes in the scope of work and additional design services to include safety items, landscaping design and odor control enhancements: (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for said services. See page "J" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-40, approving Addendum No. 2 to said agreement with John Carollo Engineers for said additional services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $76,760.00, increasing the total �1 authorized compensation from $1,914,805.00 to an amount not to exceed $1,991 ,565.00. See page "K" (j ) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-41, approving Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Dames a Moore to conduct Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-3, and Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-2, providing for a reallocation of the costs among categories within said agreement, with no change in the maximum authorized compensation of $840,620.00, and providing for a name change to Dames & Moore, Inc. , a Delaware Corporation. See page ..r -5- I 5/13/92 (10) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (k) Consideration of the following actions relative to the Professional Services Agreement with Carleton Engineers and Consultants, Inc. for specialized consulting services relative to Districts' compliance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District's rules and regulations: (1 ) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for said services. See page M. (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-42, approving said agreement with Carleton Engineers and Consultants, Inc. for said services, on an as-needed basis, for three years, from June 1, 1992 to May 31 , 1995, at the following hourly rates (estimated annual services are $25,000.00) : See page "N" Agreement Period Hourly Rate 6/01/92 - 5/31/93 $125.00 6/01/93 - 5/31/94 127 .50 6/01/94 - 5/31/95 130.00 (1) Consideration of motion receiving and filing Staff Report dated May 5, 1992; and authorizing staff to prequalify firms and to solicit proposals for Phase I Upgrade of Compliance Data Rase Management System, Specification No. S-064, for consideration by the Directors at a later date. See page "O" (m) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to designate one staff member to attend the Pollution Prevention Strategies for Sustainable Development International Workshop, June 2, 1992 through June 4, 1992, in Rome, Italy, as requested by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; and approving reimbursement for transportation, lodging, meals and incidental expenses, in accordance with Districts' established expense reimbursement policies and budgetary authorizations. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (11) ALL DISTRICTS Consideratio-n of items deleted from consent calendar, if any -6- i (12) ALL DISTRICTS 5/13/92 i (a) Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee and Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committees' written reports of their meetings on April 15, 1992 and April 22, 1992, respectively (Copies enclosed with Directors$ agenda material) (b) Consideration of action on the following items recommended by said Committees: (1) Consideration of motion appointing Robert F. Driver Associates as broker of record for Districts' all-risk property, earthquake and boiler and machinery insurance program; authorizing compensation for initial insurance policy renewal or placement, based upon insurance industry's standard commission practice; and authorizing staff to negotiate an agreement on a fee-for-services basis for subsequent brokerage services. (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-43, amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, revising certain Sewer Collection Facilities Division and Information Services Division position classifications and salaries, as recommended by classification study. (3) Consideration of the following actions re Capital Improvement Program, 1990-92 Series C Certificates of Participation Issue: (a) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to negotiate an agreement with Merrill Lynch for �j underwriting services, for an amount not to exceed $5.95/$1,000 certificate for a variable-rate issue, or $9.95/$1,000 certificate for a fixed-rate issue; and authorizing the General Manager to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-44, approving Letter agreement with Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander 6 Ferdon, dated April 7, 1992, for special co-Bond Counsel services, based on the following fee schedule: See page P. Maximum Type of Issue/Service Fee Variable Rate Only $ 801000 Variable and Fixed Rate Combination 100,000 Expenses At Cost (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-45, approving - Memorandum agreement with Rourke a Woodruff, dated April 7, 1992, for special Co-Bond Counsel services, for a maximum fee not to exceed $7,500.00. See page [ITEM (12) (b) CONTINUED ON PAGE a] -7- 5/13/92 (12) ALL DISTRICTS - (Continued from page 7) V (b) (4) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-46, amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, establishing a 1992 Summer Work Program `a for painting, grounds maintenance and pump station maintenance work. See page "R" (5) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 19 to the plans and specifications for Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33, authorizing an addition of $954,004.00 to the contract with Gust K. Newberg Construction Company for seven items of additional work in settlement of contractor's claims. See page S. (6) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-59, opposing requirements for disclosure of ex parts communications with members of the governing body of governmental entities. See page "T" (7) Consideration of the following resolutions dedicating revenues for payment of obligations: See page U. District No. Resolution No. 1 92-47-1 2 92-48-2 3 92-49-3 5 92-50-5 6 92-51-6 7 92-52-7 11 92-53-11 13 92-54-13 14 92-55-14 (13) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Report of the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee's written report of the meeting on April 30, 1992 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) (b) Consideration of action on items recommended by the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee: (1) Consideration of the following actions relative to possible acquisition of landsite from waste Water Disposal Company for use as a water recycling site: [ITEM (13) (b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 9] (13) ALL DISTRICTS - (Continued from 5/13/92 � page 8) (b) (1) (a) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to enter into an agreement with Waste Water Disposal Company (WWDC) to allow site `J investigations in order to characterize condition of WWDC property, providing the Districts with first right of refusal for acquisition of the site, and further providing that WWDC pay the costs of investigation. (b) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to negotiate an agreement with Dames a Moore, Inc. to perform site investigation services to characterize the condition of the Waste Water Disposal Company property, in an amount not to exceed $35,000.00 (said cost to be reimbursed by WWDC) ; and authorizing the General Manager to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. (2) Consideration of motion increasing Districts' participation in the "Think Earth" Environmental Education Consortium from $30,000.00 to $56,000.00, allocating an additional $26,000.00 for the Districts' share of the costs to complete and distribute the environmental educational materials for the K-6 (Kindergarten through 6th grade) program over the next five years. (14) ALL DISTRICTS Repo� lFe Special Joint works Selection Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee's written report of their meeting on Wednesday, May 6, 1992 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) . (15) ALL DISTRICTS Closed Session: During the course of conducting the usiness set orth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards, the Chairman may convene the Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9 or 54957.6. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employee compensation; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as final actions are taken by the Directors on any of these sub,sets, the minutes will reflect all required is of information. (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary (b) Reconvene in regular session (c) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session. -9- J 5/13/92 t (16 ) ALL DISTRICTS Ot er usiness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ar (17) DISTRICT 3 other and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (18) DISTRICT 3 Consi3-e—ration of motion to adjourn (19 ) DISTRICT 5 Offer siness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (20) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (21) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (22) DISTRICT 11 0 er usiness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (23) DISTRICT 13 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (24) DISTRICT 13 Consideration of motion to adjourn (25) DISTRICTS 1 6 2 Considerationof the following actions relative to Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30: (a) Verbal report of staff (b) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said job, making miscellaneous technical modifications. (c) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said job, changing the date for receipt of bids from April 14, 1992 to April 28, 1992. (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-56, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for said project to Mladen Buntich Construction Co. , Inc. in the total amount of $3,471,857.00. See page .,Vo (26) DISTRICT 1 o usiness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any -10- (27) DISTRICT 1 5/13/92 Coma-eration of motion to adjourn (28) DISTR i ICTS 6 6 14 Consi oraton7 of the following actions relative to Final �✓ Supplement No. 2 to Environmental Impact Report for Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13, relative to Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-IA: (See enclosed package included with Directors- agenda material) (a) Verbal report of staff and Counsel (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file written comments received after the public hearing on April 8, 1992 (Copies included in the Final Supplement No. 2 to EIR) (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Summary dated April 21, 1992 re Final Supplement No. 2 to said EIR (d) Discussion (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Final Supplement No. 2 to Environmental Impact Report for Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13, relative to Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-lA; and certify that said Final Supplement No. 2 has been completed in compliance with the State and Districts- Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended. (f) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-57, rescinding Resolution No. 90-86 (which previously certified Supplement No. 1 to said EIR) ; certifying Supplement No. 1 to Environmental Impact Report for Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13, relative to Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-lA; certifying Final Supplement No. 2 to Environmental Impact Report for Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13, relative to Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A; making certain findings relating to significant environmental effects identified in Final Supplement No. 2 to said EIR re Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-lA; adopting mitigation measures and monitoring plan; adopting statement of overriding considerations; and authorizing the filing of a Notice of Determination re said project. -11- 5/13/92 r v (29 ) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 30) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (31 ) DISTRICT 7 Ott u—siness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 32) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn (33) DISTRICT 14 Ot er usiness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 34) DISTRICT 14 Con— side�ion of motion to adjourn -12- MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts P.O.Box 8127• 108" Ellis Avenue of Orange County, California Fountain Valley,CA 92728.8127 Telephone:(714) 962-2411 JOINT BOARDS Meeting Date May 13, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting. EACH DISTRICT 4: ANNUAL ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN AND CHAIRMAN PRO TEN OF EACH DISTRICT'S BOARD. In accordance with the Districts' rules of procedure (see following excerpt) , a Chairman and Chairman pro tem for each District Board is elected annually at the May meeting. Excerpt from Rules of Procedure for Meetings "7. Chairman of the District - A Chairman (and Chairman pro tem) shall be elected by majority vote as the first order of business by the members of each District's Board of Directors at the first meeting in May of each year, and said Chairman (and Chairman pro tem) shall serve at the pleasure of the majority of said members." For the information of the new Directors, the Districts' regulations provide that each Chairman automatically becomes a member of the Executive Committee, which ordinarily meets monthly at the call of the Joint Chairman. This Committee also includes the Joint Chairman, Vice Joint Chairman and the representatives of the County Board of Supervisors. The Executive Committee's function is to study and make recommendations, to the Joint Boards concerning major issues and policy matters. May 13, 1992 The current Chairmen and Chairmen pro tem are as follows: District No. Chairman Chairman pro tem 1 Dan Griset Charles E. Puckett 2 Iry Pickler John Collins 3 Sal A. Sapien Burnie Dunlap 5 Ruthelyn Plummer Don Roth 6 James A. Wahner Don Roth 7 Richard B. Edgar (Retired) James A. Wahner 11 Grace H. Winchell Jack Kelly 13 William D. Ehrle Fred Barrera 14 Peer Swan Sally Anne Sheridan Nominations for Joint Chairman are made at the regular June meeting and the election takes place at the July regular meeting. Nominations and election of the Vice Joint Chairman are conducted at the July regular meeting. ALL DISTRICTS 10(a): AWARD OF TWO (2) CAB AND CHASSIS, SPECIFICATION NO. A-159. These two trucks are for the Mechanical Maintenance Division in the Operations and Maintenance Department. These vehicles will be used for welding work within the treatment plants and the 35 outlying pump stations throughout the several Districts, and will be replacing two 1973 trucks, each with over 125,000 miles. These older trucks are frequently in need of repair and are no longer economical to operate. The existing welding equipment and accessories will be modified and transferred to the new vehicles. The old vehicles will be sent to auction. Sealed bids were received on April 7, 1992, for the purchase of the two trucks. Four bids were received. The low bid received was for $30,388.00, and the high bid was $38,262.00, plus applicable sales tax. Staff recommends award be made to GMC Truck Center, the lowest responsible bidder, for the Purchase of Two (2) Cab and Chassis, Specification No. A-159, in the total amount of $30,388.00, plus applicable sales tax. As part of our SCAQMD regulations compliance program, the Districts are investigating the conversion of selected vehicles from gasoline powered to liquid propane or other alternate fuel that will assist in clean air goals. The above purchases are therefore made with the confirmation that the vehicles can be converted to "clean burn" fuel . -2- May 13, 1992 10(b): AWARD PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF ONE (1) GAS CHROMATOGRAPH/SULFUR HEMILUMINESCENCE DETECTOR SYSTEM. SPECIFICATION NO. E-218. The Districts are mandated by permit conditions from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) to analyze digester gases for total sulfur containing compounds. The method specified for use by SCAQMD is 307-91 which utilizes a gas chromatograph (GC) equipped with a sulfur chemiluminescence detector (SCD). At this point in time, Sievers Research, Inc. is the sole manufacturer of the SCD and this detector which is compatible with a flame ionization detector (FID) equipped on a capillary gas chromatograph. The SCAQMD uses the Sievers SCD with the Hewlett Packard 5890 GC/FID. To achieve laboratory certification by the SCAQMD for Method 307-91, we must be in full accordance with their methodology. The certification process will be facilitated by using a system that is similarly equipped to the SCAQMD system. The Sievers Research, Inc. SCD, supplied by Hewlett Packard, is priced at $15,800.00 plus tax. Staff has requested quotations from three GC/FID manufacturers for systems that meet the specifications for analyzing air samples using the SCO. Fisons Instruments quoted $21,265.00, Varian Instruments quoted $16,035.00, and Hewlett Packard quoted $15,697.00. Hewlett Packard is a licensed distributor of the Sievers Research, Inc. sulfur chemiluminescence detector. The system will be fully supported by Hewlett Packard from installation to support and service. In addition, the Hewlett Packard 5890 GC represents a cost savings of $338.00 over the Varian Instruments 3500 GC, and $5,568.00 over the Fisons Instruments Carlo Erba GC. Staff therefore recommends authorization to issue a purchase order to Hewlett Packard for Purchase and Installation of One (1) Gas Chromatograph Sulfur Chemiluminescence Detector System (Specification No. E-218) in the amount of $30,440.00, plus sales tax. 10(c): AWARD PURCHASE OF 12.5% SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION, SPECIFICATION NO. P-131 REBID . Staff has identified one foul air scrubber at the North Scrubber Complex at the Huntington Beach plant as a treatment plant odor source. We have been using sodium hypochlorite (bleach) experimentally for the past eight months to determine if its use improves the odor control . Bleach has proved effective in odor removal and is a safer alternative than chlorine. There have been no odor complaints at Plant No. 2 since the Districts began using the bleach. Staff has therefore solicited bids for supplying sodium hypochlorite solution. Sealed bids were received on April 7, 1992, for delivery of 12.5% sodium hypochlorite solution for a one-year period beginning May 14, 1992, with provisions for four one-year extensions. Six bids were received. The low bid received was $0.44 per gallon and the high bid was $0.65 per gallon, plus applicable sales tax. The low bid is approximately 35% less than the Districts currently pay for bleach delivered in 275-gallon tote bins used for the experiment. Based on an estimated annual usage of 85,000 gallons, the estimated annual cost is $37,400.00, plus applicable sales tax. -3- May 13, 1992 ' Staff recommends award of a contract to Jones Chemicals, Inc. , the lowest responsible bidder, for Purchase of 12.5% Sodium Hypochlorite Solution, Specification No. P-131(Rebid) , for the unit price of $0.44 per gallon delivered, plus applicable sales tax, for a one-year period, with provisions for four one-year extensions. 10(e): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 8 TO CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB N -1 -1. Job No. J-19-1, Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, is part of the $66 million master-planned Central Power Generation System which is being built under several contracts at both plants. This $15.5 million contract includes installation of three pre-purchased digester gas burning, spark-ignited, 3472 horsepower engines with generators which are each capable of producing 2500 KW of electrical power. Change Order No. 8 adds $58,902.00 to the contract for two items of added work. Item 1, in the net amount of $37,729.00, provides a neutral grounding transformer that meets Southern California Edison (SCE) requirements. SCE requires that the neutral grounding transformer have an impedance of 2.5 percent. The consultant incorrectly specified an impedance of 8 percent in the contract documents. The impedance required by SCE is unusually low in the type of transformer recommended by the consultant and requires custom design and manufacturing. Credit for the transformer specified in the contract, that is hereby deleted, is included in the net cost of this item. Item 2, in the amount of $21,173.00, is for two new compartments in an existing cable tray to provide space for the new influent pump power cables being installed under this contract. The new power cables will be installed in one of the new compartments. The contract requires that the new cables be Installed in an existing compartment in the tray. However, field Investigations determined that installation of the cables in the existing compartment would violate maximum cable tray fill requirements in the National Electric Code. The work in this item includes installing the new tray divider, relocating all control wiring in the existing tray into the second new compartment and relocating of control wire conduits, supporting control wiring at cable tray intersections, and new cable tray in the basement of Power Building 3A. This new cable tray is required to reroute the new power cable where new compartments could not be provided in the existing cable tray because of existing cable congestion. The above-described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items are for replaced work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 8 for an addition of $58,902.00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation. There is no time extension associated with this change order. -4- May 13, 1992 �./ 10(f) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 13 TO CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT TREATMENT PLANT B NO. J-19-2. Job No. J-19-2 at Plant No. 2 is part of the new $66 million master-planned Central Power Generation System which is being built under several contracts at both plants. This $21 million contract includes installation of five pre-purchased digester-gas burning, spark-ignited 4167 horsepower engines with generators which are each capable of producing 3000 KW of electrical power, plus three pre-purchased gas compressors. Change Order No. 13 adds $351,479.23 and a time extension of ten calendar days to the contract for nine items of work. The first four items and Item 9 are for work omitted from the original contract drawings. Item 1 is the installation of electrical circuits for the operation of speed signals between control panels and engine governors at a cost of $7,621.50. Item 2 is the installation of electrical power circuits for emissions monitoring of the five engines at a cost of $11,807.13. Item 3 is the installation of various electrical circuits for the synchronous operation of the generators, signals for sump pump seal leakage and power for cooling fans, at a cost of $30,158.23. Item 4 is the installation of electrical circuits for the five engine ignition boosters at a cost of $13,142.37. Item 5 is the reduction of the contract retainage (the standard percentage of work that is finished but for which payment is withheld until contract completion). Nearly all work is complete and a retention reduction is appropriate. Item 6 is a release of claims agreement with the contractor through May 13, 1992, in consideration of Items 5, 7 and 8. Item 7 represents the results of negotiations with the Contractor in addition to resolutions of claims as noted in Item 6, Change Order No. 8, in order to resolve those issues encountered since the previous agreement. Item 7 Is a no-cost item; however, it increases the potential early completion bonus specified in Change Order No. 8 from $525,000 to $555,000. Item 8 is the resolution of a claim by the Contractor for changed conditions to the Phase A/B reconfiguration electrical duct tie-in in order to insure there would be no interruption to plant operations, at a cost of $60,000 and a time extension of ten calendar days. Items 7 and 8 were necessary due to actual field conditions such as high voltage cables not located in the assigned ductwork as noted on the contract drawings. The changes, and delays, were made in the interest of safety. Item 9 includes various modifications to the medium voltage electrical switchgear that was necessary to insure the complete compatibility of Districts-furnished and Contractor-furnished equipment at a cost of $228,750.00 Most of this work was required to be added because of design omissions from the original contract drawings. Other work was required because of a change in operation not anticipated in the original design. That change is the inability at this time to operate the generating facility in parallel with Southern California Edison (SCE) until SCE completes some system modifications. Once the facility is able to generate in parallel with SCE, some equipment change-outs will be required. None of this work is for replaced facilities. -5- May 13, 1992 ' The above described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 13 for an addition of $351,479.23 and a time extension of ten calendar days to the contract with Brinderson Corporation. 10(f): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 20 TO GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-1. Job No. P1-34-1, Gas Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, includes the construction of a new city water pump station, a new power building, and a new gas compressor building at a cost of $13.6 million. The contract also includes supplying and installing three reciprocating compressors at Plant No. 1, and supplying three reciprocating compressors at Plant No. 2. Change Order No. 20 adds $10,548.00 for two items of work to the contract. Item 1, in the amount of $4,514.00, is for providing industrial water piping and connections for the West Foul Air Facility, Tunnel No. 8 washdown piping, and additional piping required to tie into piping installed under the Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities project. These connections were not shown on the contract drawings. Item 2, in the amount of $6,034.00, is for relocating potable water and industrial water lines in Intersection H to allow installation of four 12 KV conduits under the Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1 project. The location of existing piping in the tunnel intersection interferes with the routing of the proposed conduits. Providing additional bends in the conduits to avoid the relocation would exceed National Electric Code requirements for conduit bends, therefore, staff recommended relocating piping in the intersection instead of redesigning the conduit routing. The above-described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. This change order is not for any replacement work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 20 for an addition of $10,548.00 to the contract with Ziebarth 8 Alper. There is no time extension associated with this change order. 10(g): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 9 TO CONSTRUCTION OF DIGESTERS NOS. 11-16 AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 JOB NO. P1- 4- ; REHABILITATION F DIGESTERS 9 AND 10 AT RE LAMATI N PLANT N0. 1 JOB N0. P1-35-2• AND NSTALLATION OF WASTE DIGESTER GA FLARE FA ILITIE AT PLANT 1 AND Z, JBN J-21. This $27.6 million project includes the construction of new Digesters 11-16 (Job No. P1-34-3), the rehabilitation of of Digesters 9 and 10 (Job No. P1-35-2) and the construction of new digester gas flare facilities at Plants 1 and 2 (Job No. J-21). Change Order No. 9 is a net addition of $75,878.00 and nine calendar days for six additional items of added work and one item of deleted work. -6- May 13, 1992 Item 1, in the amount of $1,094.00, is for the addition of a drainage channel in the new Control Building basement. Tunnel drainage as shown on the drawings involved sloping of the new concrete slab. This was not possible due to existing concrete tunnel elevations and necessitated an additional drainage channel. The added channel was required to facilitate flow from a connecting existing tunnel and was not shown on the contract plans. Item 2 provides for modifications to the 30-inch riser piping within the center of each of the six new digesters for $2,040.00. The modifications involved changes to the openings at the top of each pipe to allow for proper flow characteristics within the digester and were not shown on the contract plans. Item 3 is a credit in the amount of ($3,500,00) for the deletion of 28 light fixtures from the contract, substituting surplus fixtures from another job. Item 4, in the amount of $1,444.00, is for the labor and equipment supplied by the contractor to remedy the flooding of the contractor's area, caused by a failure in the Districts existing sump pump which is located adjacent to the new construction. Item 5, in the amount of $6,000.00, is for the required addition of concrete to the roof slabs of the two Digester Control Buildings to provide thicker concrete required for proper reinforcement steel coverage. Item 6 involves revisions to the 30-inch sludge recirculation piping located below the six new digester slabs, adding $66,193.00 and nine calendar days. The modifications included pipeline revisions to the specified support system, increased strength of the concrete encasement and changes to the piping joints. The specified underground supports were deleted and replaced with stainless steel rod hangers. The unsuitable soils encountered below the pipeline necessitated the change in piping supports. The weight and fixed point �../ connection design of the specified concrete supports may have subjected the pipeline to excessive stress during the anticipated settlement between the digester slab and the concrete encased pipeline. The strength of the concrete encasement was increased from 2500 PSI to 4000 PSI to accommodate the revised support system. The contract documents gave the contractor an option of supplying restrained mechanical joints or restrained push-on joints. The contractor selected restrained mechanical joints. After further review it was determined by staff that the restrained mechanical joints did not provide the desired flexibility for settlement at the connection between the pipeline and the structures. The solution to this problem was to revise the piping joints and the concrete encasement. These modifications resulted in a nine-day time extension to the contract due to the critical nature of the scheduling of this work. Item 7, in the amount of $2,607.00, is for modifications to the digester gas flare piping at both plants. It was necessary to segregate the low fire flare piping from the supply manifold to provide a smooth transition to the medium and high fire burners. These modifications were not shown on the contract drawings and were performed on all of the four new flares to comply with AQMD permit requirements. The above-described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase and are not for replaced work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 9 for a net addition of $75,878.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. There is a nine-day time extension associated with this change order. -7- May 13, 1992 10(i): RECEIVE AND FILE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND APPROVE ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS RE ADDITIONAL DESIGN SERVICES FOR MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-38, AND MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT N . 2, JOB NO, P2-43. In June 1991, the Directors awarded a Professional Services Agreement to John Carollo Engineers for preparation of plans and specifications for design and construction support services for miscellaneous facilities improvements at both plants, to design replacement of equipment which is obsolete or has reached the end of its useful lifespan, rehabilitation of facilities which are in need of repair, or modification of process elements to improve plant-wide performance. The projects also incorporate numerous small facilities additions and non-related work items that can most economically be accomplished in a single, larger contract. Addendum No. 1, which revised the errors and omissions insurance requirements, was approved at the February Board meeting. Since preparation of the scope of work for the projects, several additional needs have been identified which, because of their small scale in relation to the large number of items in the miscellaneous improvements projects, could best be included in these jobs thereby benefiting from economies Of scale. At Reclamation Plant No. 1, safety handrail is needed adjacent to the new digester cleaning beds and at stairways at Buildings 5 and 6; landscaping is needed in areas adjacent to Fuentes Drive, the new primary sedimentation basins u Nos. 6-15, and the trickling filters; security camera improvements are needed at the wastehauler station; and an automatic transfer switch to supply standby power to the plant water pumps is needed. Similar work items are included in the miscellaneous work project at Plant 2. Also needed at Plant No. 2 are fuel flow meters on the boilers, required by the SCAQMD, and bulk bleach facilities at the North Scrubber Complex. As discussed above under Agenda Item No. 10(d), during the past five months bleach has been used experimentally to reduce odors from the North Scrubber Complex. No odor complaints were received during the experiment. Permanent bleach storage and dosing facilities are therefore recommended to reduce odors that are within the specified limits but still detectable in the residential neighborhood across the street. A new sample stinger is also needed to allow sampling for NPDES permit requirements when the existing stinger is out for maintenance or repairs. As authorized by the Boards in January, the Selection Committee has negotiated Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for the additional professional services on an hourly-rate basis, including labor and overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants and fixed profit, for the additional contract amount of $76,760.00, as follows: -8- May 13, 1992 Proposed Existing Proposed Amended Agreement Addn. No. 2 Agreement Engineering Services: Direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 156%, not to exceed $1,359,589.20 $60,770.00 $1 ,420,359.20 Construction Support Services and 08M Manual Preparation: Direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 160%, not to exceed 223,425.80 0.00 223,425.80 Direct Expenses at cost, not to exceed 67,990.00 8,700.00 76,690.00 Subconsultants, not to exceed 34,200.00 0.00 34,200.00 Fixed Profit 229,600.00 7,290.00 236,890.00 Total , not to exceed $1,914,805.00 $76,760.00 $1,991,565.00 The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection �..i Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above additional work and adoption of a resolution approving Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the agenda supporting documents. 10(j): RECEIVE AND FILE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND APPROVE ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH DAMES 8 MOORE IN RE SEISMIC TUDY ELEMENT F MI CELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1 JOB N0. P1-38-3, AND SEISMIC STUDY ELEMENT F MI CELLANEOUS MPR 1EMENTS TO FA ILI IE AT PLANT N 2 J B N . P2-4 - , FOR REALLUCAMIUN-W-F-U-N-D-9 BETWEEN CATEGORIES. The Directors are aware that the Districts are currently enhancing and Improving the reliability of the treatment plants to withstand the impacts of a major earthquake. A three-phased approach is in progress. First, in October 1990, the Directors approved a professional services agreement with Dames 8 Moore to conduct geotechnical and structural investigations on Districts' facilities, focusing on older facilities designed under less stringent criteria. Second, on April 17, 1991, an earthquake training exercise was conducted to review safety aspects, establish procedures and develop an emergency management organizational framework. This occurred after months of planning and development of formal procedures, etc. Finally, the Directors have authorized staff to proceed with non-structural modifications to the treatment plants. This work includes the tie down of equipment, pipes, utilities, etc. , to ensure that they are secure during an earthquake. The work is being accomplished either by Districts' staff or included in various other construction contracts. -9- May 13, 1992 Headworks B and C at Plant No. 2 were high on the priority list and Dames 8 Moore has completed a project report on these structures. Headworks C, the larger of the two influent pumping plants, was built in the early 1960s; Headworks B before that. These structures, designed in an earlier era, are suspect because design criteria were different then. The report confirmed that structures could be saved from major damage through proper structural and geotechnical retrofitting. This work was added to the overall scope by Addendum No. 1 to the October 1990 agreement. Dames 8 Moore has requested that the amounts originally designated in the various work categories be adjusted to more closely reflect actual expenditures, as follows: Proposed Existing Proposed Amended Agreement Addn. No. 2 Agreement Direct Labor, (hourly rates including labor plus overhead at 180%), not to exceed $627,540 $ 0 $627,540 Direct Expenses, at cost, not to exceed 17,800 5,000 22,800 Subconsultants Fees, at cost, not to exceed 125,000 (5,000) 120,000 Fixed Profit 70,280 0 70,280 Total , not to exceed $840,620 $ 0 $840,620 Dames 8 Moore has also changed its form of business which has resulted in a name change. The firm is now known as Dames 8 Moore, Inc. , a Delaware Corporation. The action appearing on the agenda is to adopt the resolution approving Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Dames 8 Moore for design of Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. PI-38-3, and Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-2. A copy of the resolution is attached with the agenda supporting documents. 10(k) APPROVE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CARLETON ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS INC. FOR SPECIALIZED ONSULTING SERVICES RE DISTRICTS' COMPLIANCE WITH SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT RULES AND REGULATIONS. The principal of Carleton Engineers and Consultants, F. E. Carleton, has previously assisted the Districts with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) issues for the last six years on several purchase order -10- May 13, 1992 contracts. He has an excellent working knowledge of our needs and because of his involvement with the SCAQMD and other clients is abreast of new and proposed rules and regulations from a broad perspective. He has assisted the Districts In obtaining permits from SCAQMD for current and future projects, preparing annual emissions reports, acquiring emission reduction credits, and investigating new control technology for our standby generators. In April , the Directors authorized the Selection Committee to negotiate a professional services agreement with Carleton Engineers and Consultants Inc. for specialized consulting assistance on SCAQMD issues. The Committee has negotiated an agreement to provide assistance on SCAQMD-related issues, on an as-needed basis, at hourly rates for three one-year periods, as follows: June 1, 1992 through May 31, 1993 $125.00 per hour June 1, 1993 through May 31, 1994 $127.00 per hour June 1, 1994 through May 31, 1995 $130.00 per hour Staff estimates that the annual services will total approximately $25,000. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and adoption of a resolution approving the Professional Services Agreement with Carleton Engineers 6 Consultants, Inc. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the supporting agenda documents. ..i 10(1 ): AUTHORIZATION TO PRE UA�LIFY FIRMS AND SOLICIT PROPOSALS FOR PHASE 1 UPGRADE OF THE CO L AP I NCE DATA BA MANA EMENT Y TE�PECI FI A� TIIFN NO. S-064. Attached with the supporting agenda documents is a separate staff report requesting authorization to prequalify firms and solicit proposals for the Phase 1 Upgrade of the Compliance Data Base Management System, Specification No. 5-064, for consideration by the Directors at a future meeting. The estimated cost is $90,000. 10(m) : AUTHORIZATION TO SEND ONE STAFF MEMBER TO POLLUTION PREVENTION WORKSHOP N R ME, ITAL . The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has asked Ms. Mahin Talebi of the Districts' Source Control Division staff to attend on behalf of the EPA and NATO, the Pollution Prevention Strategies for Sustainable Development Workshop in Rome, Italy on June 2-4, 1992. Ms. Talebi was Invited to participate in the workshop and also to make a presentation on the Districts' pretreatment program and policies that promote pollution prevention. The Districts recently received a national award from EPA for our Pollution Prevention Program. The purpose of the Rome Workshop is to foster the exchange and dissemination of the most current and successful policies and programs that promote pollution prevention. Programs, policies and legislation affecting -11- May 13, 1992 pollution prevention at various government levels will be discussed, along with case studies that examine how programs are initiated and their pollution prevention impacts. The Districts' own Pollution Prevention Program would be one of these case studies. Ms. Talebi has given several presentations regarding our Pollution Prevention Program, including a presentation at the 1991 AMSA Summer Technical Meeting in New York, and a presentation at the 1992 EPA Pollution Prevention Workshop in North Carolina. As a result of our participation in these activities, the Districts' Pollution Prevention Program has received nationwide attention and recognition for its excellence. The Districts are the only POTW that has been invited to attend the Workshop in Rome and to give a presentation regarding our program. Attendance at the Rome Workshop offers a unique opportunity, which was made at EPA's behest, to extend that attention and recognition to an international level. Staff therefore is recommending to send Ms. Talebi to the Workshop in Rome, Italy, June 2-4, 1992 and for reimbursement of travel , meals, lodging and incidental expenses in accordance with established Districts' policies and budget authorizations. The estimated cost is $2,000. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR NON-CONSENT ALL DISTRICTS 12: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE. The Fiscal Policy Committee met on April 15 and the Executive Committee on April 22. Enclosed for the Directors are written reports on their discussions and recommended actions for consideration by the Boards. 13: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CONSERVATION, RECYCLE AND REUSE COMMITTEE. The Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee met on April 30, 1992. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on its discussions and recommended action for consideration by the Boards. 14: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SPECIAL JOINT WORKS SELECTION COMMITTEE RE COMPUTERIZATION. The Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Computerization met on May 6, 1992. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on its discussions and recommended action for consideration by the Boards. -12- May 13, 1992 15: AGENDA FOR CLOSED SESSION. From time to time it is necessary for the Boards to convene in closed session to consider purchase and sale of real property, potential or pending litigation, personnel matters or other matters which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act. In order to avoid a situation where a closed session is needed but does not appear on the agenda, this standing item is placed on the agenda each month providing for a closed session at the regular meeting, if deemed necessary by the Boards. DISTRICTS 1 AND 2 25: APPROVE ADDENDA NOS. 1 AND 2 AND AWARD MEMORY LANE INTERCEPTOR, CONTRACT NO. 2-30. This project includes nearly 12,500 feet of varying sizes of vitrified clay sewer pipe through the length of the job from the Santa Ana River, east in Memory Lane, underneath the Santa Ana Freeway, along Owens Drive, north in Parker Street and ending at La Veta Avenue and Batavia Street in the City of Orange. This 2.2-mile long sewer will relieve current deficiencies in capacity within the local collection sewers of the Cities of Orange and Santa Ana and eliminate the need for construction of a new City of Santa Ana sewer from Main Place to the existing North Bristol Trunk Sewer, a City of Orange local sewer in La Veta Avenue from the beginning of the Orange Subtrunk to Batavia Street, and the District No. 2 Orange Subtrunk parallel. These projects were estimated to cost the cities about $3.6 million. The Memory Lane Interceptor will be funded jointly by the Sanitation Districts ($1.4 million shared approximately equally by Districts Nos. 1 and 2). the City of Santa Ana ($1.3 million) and the City of Orange ($700,000) , with the Sanitation Districts retaining ownership and responsibility for maintaining the new sewer facility. The construction of the new interceptor will eliminate all marginal deficiencies within the Santa Ana systems, reduce the amount of flow needed to be diverted to the District No. 1 Raitt Street Trunk Sewer, utilize excess capacity in the SARI and preserve current excess capacity in District No. 1 facilities. (1) Addendum No. 1 Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications makes miscellaneous technical clarifications, adjusts the quantities on some items in the Schedule of Prices, makes revisions to the Sequence of Work by adding phases and adjusting the corresponding liquidated damages to comply with the requests by the cities for scheduling, and adds revisions to three of the sheets in the plans to correct technical items deficient in the design. (2) Addendum No. 2 Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications changes the bid opening date from April 14, 1992 to April 28, 1992. 1%-/ -13- May 13, 1992 ` (3) Award of Contract On April 28, 1992, eight bids were received for the Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30. The bids ranged from a high of $5,388,091, to a low of $3,471,857, submitted by Mladen Buntich Construction Co. , Inc. A complete bid tabulation is attached to the supporting agenda material . Staff recommends award to Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc. for their low bid amount of $3,471,857. The engineer's estimate was $39800,000. DISTRICTS 6, 7 AND 14 28: CEQA ACTIONS RELATIVE TO FINAL SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REP RT R BAKER- I LER INTERCEPTOR, LUNIRACT NO. 14-1-1A. Since the formation in 1986 of County Sanitation District No. 14 (CSD 14) , Sanitation Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14 have been working toward the completion of a Joint backbone sewage conveyance system which will deliver wastewater from the communities of Irvine, Costa Mesa and Santa Ana to the Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant. Portions of this approximately $25 million Interceptor have been completed and other portions are under construction. Remaining is the 90-inch reinforced concrete pipe sewer (RCP), between Fairview Road at Baker Street and the Santa Ana River. Within this reach, two private easements remain to be acquired. One of these easements is for the construction of a reinforced concrete box (equivalent in size to the 90-inch RCP) within the Mesa Verde Country Club and Golf Course, immediately south of Gisler Avenue and east of the Santa Ana River. The second is through a parking lot at the rear of an office building fronting on Nutmeg Place between Nutmeg Place and Caraway Drive, Just west of Harbor Boulevard. At the July 1990 Board meeting, the Directors certified Final Supplement No. 1 to the EIR for Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13, relative to the Baker-Gisler Interceptor and Baker Force Mains, which addressed the upsizing of the pipe and a revised alignment from that originally envisioned. Mesa Verde Country Club and Golf Course opposed the necessary acquisition of the easement and the construction of the sewer conduit by the Districts and successfully challenged, in court, the Districts' previous California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documents. Although the court ruled in favor of the Districts on 29 of 31 counts, the court also ruled that the previous CEQA documentation did not adequately address Mesa Verde's maintenance access to Gisler Avenue, or the monitoring and reporting aspects pertaining to mitigation measures for the golf course. As a result, staff and General Counsel determined that new CEQA documents should be prepared addressing these site specific issues. In February 1992, the Directors received a staff report on Draft Supplement No. 2 to the existing CEQA Environmental Impact Report, authorizing the ci-rculation of the Notice of Preparation and the Initial Study re Supplement No. 2, and set a public hearing for March 11. At the March 11 Board meeting, upon advice of Counsel , the public hearing was postponed to the April 8 Board -14- May 13, 1992 Meeting, and the Environmental Consultant, Ultrasystems, was authorized to prepare and circulate Draft Supplement No. 2 to the EIR re Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Contract No. 14-1-1A, in compliance with CEQA requirements. At the April 8 Board meeting the Boards conducted a public hearing at which a representative of the Mesa Verde Country Club opposed the project. At the close of the hearing the Boards directed the EIR consultant, Ultrasystems Environmental Services, to address all oral comments made at the public hearing and any written comments received during the noticed public comment period, which closed April 16, into a final Supplement No. 2 to the EIR for consideration by the Boards at the May meeting. A copy of the Final Supplement No. 2 to the EIR, a Staff Summary of it, and comments received on the Draft after the public hearing on April 8, are included with the supporting agenda documents. The proposed actions on the agenda are to comply with CEQA requirements. If any Director desires an additional copy of the previously mailed Draft EIR, please contact Jean Tappan at (714) 962-2411, extension 5001. If there are any questions, please contact Thomas M. Dawes. Director of Engineering, at the same telephone number. ynfager r Ge ral JWS:jt -15- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS RE: AGENDA ITEM N0, 12 AI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA April 22, 1992 1 0944 ELLI9 AVENUE ?0 9O%6127 V1LL FOLWAIN EY,CALIFORNIA 9272"127 914)9622411 REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Meeting Date: April 22, 19 2 - 5:30 p.m. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel William Thompson, SCAQMD William Mahoney Joint Chairman Evelyn Hart Vice Joint Chairman Buck Catlin Past Joint Chairman STAFF PRESENT: Don R. Griffin Past Joint Chairman Norman E. Culver Past Joint Chairman J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Dan Griset Chairman, District 1 Blake Anderson, Director of Iry Pickler Chairman, District 2 Technical Services Sal A. Sapien Chairman, District 3 Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering Ruthelyn Plummer Chairman, District 5 Gary Streed, Director of Finance William D. Ehrle Chairman, District 13 Gary Hasenstab, Director of Personnel Peer A. Swan Chairman, District 14 Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of Roger Stanton County Supervisor Maintenance Bob Doter, Assistant Director of Absent: Operations Toni Hutto, Sr. Personnel Analyst James A. Wahner Chairman, District 6 Grace Winchell Chairman, District 11 Don Roth County Supervisor 1) Fiscal Policy Committee Recommendations. The Fiscal Policy Committee met on April 15th and considered several items of business. Enclosed is a copy of the Committee's report. The Executive Committee reviewed the recommended action items which are summarized below: A. Property, Boiler and Machinery and Liability Insurance. Over the past few months the Committee has been reviewing the Districts' insurance programs and practices. A screening committee comprised of the Districts' Financial Manager, General Counsel , insurance consultant, and the City of Anaheim Risk Manager, screened proposals from nine firms for providing property insurance. Four of the firms were interviewed by the screening committee and two firms were interviewed by the Fiscal Policy Committee. The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends that Robert F. Driver Associates be appointed broker of record for the Districts' all-risk property, earthquake and boiler and machinery insurance program. The Committee further recommends that the broker's compensation for the initial insurance policy renewal or placement be based upon the insurance industry's standard commission practice, and that staff be authorized to negotiate an agreement on a fee for services basis for subsequent brokerage services. (1 of 7) Executive Committee Report April 22, 1992 B. Memoranda of Understanding Classification Studies. During the meet-and-confer process last year for the current three-year memoranda of understanding with the Districts' employee groups, and the process of restructuring the management supervisory team, both approved by the Joint Boards in 1991, the Districts agreed to conduct certain classification studies. Enclosed for Directors with the Fiscal Policy Committee Report are separate confidential reports summarizing the outcome of the studies. The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends the following actions to implement the results of the studies effective May 29, 1992: 1. Sewer Collection Facilities Division Reclassifications. It is recommended that he sewer collection facilities worker series be reclassified to place them on a par with the treatment plant maintenance series. The responsibilities of each have been determined to be equivalent and this will correct an inequitable situation. The estimated maximum annual salary cost is $35,736. 2. Information Services Division Reclassification. It is recommended that the Programmer classification a upgrade to require a bachelor's degree or equivalent, and transferred from the Clerical and Administrative Employee Group to the Professional Employee Group. The maximum annual salary cost is estimated at $4,560. C. A reements with Financin Team Consultin Finns re Ca ital Improvement ro ram 1 er es ert cotes of art c ation Issue. The Boards previously conducted a formal selection process for consulting members of the Districts' financing team for the Capital Improvement Program, 1990-92 Certificates of Participation issues. As recently reported to the Boards, the Fiscal Policy Committee is developing the next issue for mid-year, Series C, which will be in the approximate amount of $100 million and either a combination of fixed and variable rate COPS, or a variable rate COP with possible provisions for a swap to a fixed rate for certain Districts. For Series C the Fiscal Policy Committee is recommending the following agreements with the consulting finance team members previously selected by the Boards: 1. Underwriter: Merrill Lynch. The Committee recommends authorizat on for staff o negotiate an agreement with the underwriter, Merrill Lynch for an amount not to exceed $5.95/ $1,000 certificate for a variable rate issue, or $9.95/$1,000 certificate for a fixed rate issue. 2. S ecial Bond Co ndsunsel : Mud a Rose Guthrie Alexander and Ferdon. The ommittee recomme approval of the letter agreement dated April 7, 1992 with Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander and Ferdon for special bond counsel services on an hourly rate basis for an amount not to exceed $80,000 for a variable rate issue, or $100,000 for a fixed or mixed rate issue, plus out-of-pocket expenses. �..i (2 of 7) Executive Committee Report April 22, 1992 3. Co-Band Counsel : Rourke and Woodruff. The Committee recommends approval of the memorandum agreement dated April 7, 1992 with Rourke and Woodruff for co-bond counsel services for a maximum fee not to exceed $7,500. Executive Committee Recommendation: The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendations of the Fiscal Policy Committee. 2) 1992 Summer Work Program. For several years the Boards have authorized a summer work program which allows us to complete backlogged routine painting, groundskeeping and general cleanup work which can best be done in the warm summer months when temporary help (mostly students) is available. Staff reviewed the enclosed separate staff report and recommendation (pink) for continuing the summer work program for 1992. The estimated cost is $225,000 for materials and supplies and wages for 37 part-time helpers from May 18 1992, through September 25, 1992. Our Maintenance Department has determined that the summer work program saves approximately $150,000 annually from what it would cost to perform the equivalent amount of work with full-time, permanent staff. Executive Committee Recommendation: The Executive Committee recommends renewal of the Summer Work Program for 1992. 3) Settlement of Contractor's Claim and Appr2n l of Change Order No. 19 re Primary Clarifiers Nos. -15. Job No. P1- 3. The construction of the 60 million gallons per day of added primary treatment capacity at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33, is complete. This project, awarded to Gust K. Newberg Construction Co. to October 1989 in the amount of $39,657,000, is the largest single construction contract undertaken by the Sanitation Districts, with a final cost of $42,280,663.33. The project was completed on time. Last February staff reported to the Directors that the contractor was preparing to file a claim against the Districts for extra costs in the approximate amount of $3.3 million for changed site conditions (see enclosed buff staff report). Staff and Counsel have negotiated a settlement of the claim in the form of Change Order No. 19 in the amount of $954,004. Staff reported that Change Order No. 19 includes all remaining items pertaining to the construction of this project. The total amount of the change order is $954,004 including $936,554 in added costs for settling claims stemming from poor foundations encountered while constructing 4,600 feet of effluent sewer pipe. These pipes, 108 inches and 90 inches in diameter, deliver the primary treated water to either the Plant No. 1 secondary treatment facilities, or the new 120-inch interplant line now under construction. The lines, a major part of the primary clarifier project, represent about 15% of the total project cost. Difficulties were encountered in the construction of the lines because of .� changed soil conditions, i.e. , foundation soil with high peat content. Portions (3 of 7) Executive Committee Report April 22, 1992 of the pipe settled, adding costs for repair of pipe joints; removal of peat-ladened soils well below the bottom of the pipes and replacement with rock; the addition of flexible couplings to provide allowances for future movement; additional testing to ensure the pipe's integrity; and compaction grouting under the 108-inch pipe to correct differential settlement. Also included is the resolution of 20 separate issues adding an additional $17,450. Staff also reviewed the previous change orders and the final project costs. Executive Committee Recommendation: The Executive Committee recommends approval of Change order No. 1 tha wi 1 resolve all outstanding contractor's claims and finalize Job. No. P1-33. A copy of Change Order No. 19 is attached as Item (12)(b)(5) to the supporting agenda material for the May 13 Joint Board Meeting. 4) Status Re art on Exclusion from SCAQMD's Marketable Permit Program RE LAIM . At the February Executive Committee meeting, members considered a staff report on the South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD) new marketable permit program (RECLAIM). The focus of the discussion was on the necessity to exempt or exclude essential public services such as sewage treatment plants from the RECLAIM program. The Joint Chairman was authorized and directed to send a letter and appear at the SCAQMD's hearing to request that essential public services be exempted from RECLAIM. The Joint Boards also adopted a resolution in support of the proposed exemption. Joint Chairman Mahoney's letter was submitted to SCAQMD and he testified at the RECLAIM hearing on March 5. Vice Joint Chairman Hart also testified representing the Orange County Division of the League of Cities; and Director John Cox, the Districts' representative to the SCAQMD's IAIC, testified as well , representing the IAIC subcommittee and transportation interests. The majority of the Air District Board favors the exclusion and has directed its staff to consider such an exclusion in the drafting of the RECLAIM rules. Enclosed is a separate staff report (gray) discussing this issue in more detail. William Thompson, SCAQMD's senior manager of public facilities, attended the Committee meeting and reaffirmed that the course that SCAQMD is now following appears to be one that would exempt essential public services from RECLAIM. 5) SCAQMD Proposed Rule 111 -' Ex Parte Communications With Members of the oar . The Joint Chairman reported that on May 1, 1992 the SCAQMD Board will consider proposed Rule 111 re Ex Parte communications with members of the South Coast Air Quality Management District Board. With some exceptions, the proposed rule basically requires that any person communicating with a member of the SCAQMD Board outside of a public meeting, and during the notice period for the issue at hand, shall disclose that communication to the Clerk of the Air _ District Board. 1%./ (4 of 7) Executive Committee Report April 22, 1992 Further, the rule applies to any communication to personal staff of a Board member, or to the officers or staff of any governmental entity appointing authority or individual which appointed the Board member, for the explicit purpose of communicating to the Board member. For oral communications the person making the contact with the SCAQMD Board member or other defined persons must file a written report with the Clerk no later than the fifth business day after the communication occurred. The report shall include the following: • The name of the person making the communication to the SCAQMD Board member and the company, organization or agency represented • The name of the District Board member contacted • The date and time of the communication • The SCAQMD issue being addressed • A description of the substantive issues addressed by the communication and the information and positions conveyed to the SCAQMD Board member (any written materials provided shall also be attached to the report) For written communications, it is the responsibility of the SCAQMD Board member to file same with the Clerk. Executive Committee Recommendation: Following a spirited discussion the Committee directed the Joint Chairman to send a letter to the SCAQMD Board of Directors strongly opposing proposed Rule 111; and directed staff to place an item on the May 13 Joint Board Meeting Agenda formally opposing Rule 111 for consideration by the Boards. STAFF NOTE: Subsequent to the Executive Committee meeting, proposed Rule 111 was amended twice. Enclosed are the different versions of proposed Rule 111: the March 31 version reviewed by the Committee (tan); an April 21 version (salmon) , and an April 27 alternative version (ivory). The April 27 alternative would have put responsibility for reporting oral ex parte communications on the SCAQMD Board member instead of the person making the contact. It was also determined that SB 1328 had been introduced into the California Legislature by Senators Rosenthal and Presley. SB 1328 would require the SCAQMD to adopt ex parte disclosure requirements. Enclosed is a copy of the SB 1328 language (gold). On April 29 Joint Chairman Mahoney sent the enclosed letter (green tint) to SCAQMD Board Chairman Hank Wedaa opposing proposed Rule 111. On May 1 Joint Chairman Mahoney appeared at the SCAQMD Board hearing and testified in opposition to Rule 111. The �..i proposed rule received little support and was rejected by the SCAQMD Board. (5 of 7) Executive Committee Report April 22, 1992 Notwithstanding the SCAQMD Board's rejection of Rule 111, as of this writing SB 1328 is still alive in the Senate. It is therefore recommended that the Boards take the formal action of adopting a resolution opposing ex parte communication disclosures. A copy of the proposed resolution is attached as Item (12)(b)(6) to the supporting agenda material for the May 13 Joint Board Meeting. 6) AB 3214 Status Re ort and Consideration of Action DedicatingDistricts' Tax Revenues for Con ractual and Debt Retirement Commitments Pursuant to JAO Agreement. The General Counsel reviewed the status of AS 3214 - Isenberg, that would strip enterprise special districts of their annual tax revenues and transfer the money to school districts to help satisfy the state's school funding obligations under Proposition 98. The Governor's proposal would eliminate the Districts' $34 million annual property tax allocation and require that sewer service fees be increased an average of 70% and as much as 129%. The bill has been very controversial and subject to strong opposition by several major organizations including non-governmental agency groups. As a result, the bill , despite extraordinary measures by the Speaker of the Assembly, was defeated on the floor on a vote of 29 ayes and 41 noes. However, the bill has been granted reconsideration and, thus, is still alive and still has a reasonable prospect of enactment in view of the state's budget crisis. �..i Mr. Woodruff observed that prior to the floor vote the bill was amended to include some exemptions that would prevent a transfer of certain ad valorem tax revenues. This would include any revenues dedicated to carry out existing debt service obligations and service related contractual obligations. He stated that It is the opinion of both he and Special Bond Counsel that considering the terms of the Districts' Joint Administrative Organization Agreement and the agreements related to the Districts' existing COP issues, the Districts could claim an exemption from the transfer specified in AS 3214 under either of these provisions. Therefore, in order to strengthen the Districts' position to take advantage of the exemption if AS 3214 is adopted, the General Counsel recommended that the Boards consider the adoption of a resolution specifically dedicating the Districts approximate $34 million in annual tax revenues for the payment of an equal amount in satisfaction of the contractual obligations of each District under the JAO Agreement and the annual COP financing obligations. Executive Committee Recommendation: The Executive Committee directed the General Counsel and staff to draft resolutions dedicating individual District revenues for payment of obligations for consideration by the respective Boards at the regular May 13 Joint Board meeting. STAFF NOTE: Enclosed is a memorandum (stone) to the Directors from the Counsel , issued subsequent to the Executive Committee, dated April 24, 1992, providing more detail on the matter. Copies of the proposed resolutions are attached as Item (12)(b)(7) to the supporting agenda material for the May 13 Joint Board meeting. (6 of 7) Executive Committee Report April 22, 1992 7) Closed Session re Personnel Matters. The Joint Chairman convened the Conmittee into closed session for a discussion of personnel matters. Enclosed for Directors are separate confidential reports and recommendations on these matters. JWS:sc Enclosures (7 of 7) COUNTY SANRATION DISTRICTS April 15, 1992 AI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 108-ELLIS AVENUE PO BO%B127 REPORT OF THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE FD1NTAIN VAUEY.CALFORNIA 92]26212) 014I9622411 Meeting Date: April 15. 1992 FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Charles E. Puckett, Chairman Director William Mahoney, Joint Chairman James V. Evans Director Richard Edgar Don Griffin Thomas Woodruff, General Counsel Evelyn Hart Don Voller, Voller, Savage & Associates Iry Pickler Helen Savage, Voller, Savage & Associates Peer Swan Grace Winchell STAFF PRESENT: ABSENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance John Gullixson Blake Anderson, Director of Technfcal James Wahner Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of Maintenance Bob Ooten, Assistant Director of Operations Patti Gorczyca, Financial Manager 1. PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN DAILY EFFORT (PRIDE) RECOMMENDATIONS. The Committee approved the following PRIDE submittals and authorized certificates of commendation and cash awards to the employees submitting them. PRIDE No. 177 - Material Disposal Reduction. This suggestion recommends installation of a "Helical Screw Press" (HSP) which compacts and squeezes water out of rags removed from the influent at the bar screens. This reduces the weight of rays to be hauled away by about 50%. The lower weight results in an estimated $40,000 annual savings from hauling costs. The maximum cash award of $1,500 was granted to Dave Heinz. PRIDE No. 188 - Reduction of Ferrous Chloride Usage. Through modification of hydrogen sulfide sampling procedures in digesters, it has been determined that the amount of Ferrous Chloride needed to treat the odorous gas could be much lower while maintaining our odor control quality at current levels. Staff has estimated that several hundred thousand dollars have already been realized from implementation of this new procedure. The maximum cash award of $1,500 was approved for Peter Brown. PRIDE No. 197 - Covering the Activated Slude Influent Splitter Box. This suggestion recommends that a cover be placed over the activated sludge splitter box so that odor produced from primary influent as it passes over the weirs is contained. The minimum payment for this odor control suggestion of $100 was authorized for Peter McGrath. Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee ' Page 2 April 15, 1992 PRIDE No. 204 - Computer Room HVAC Energy Savings. This proposal recommended that the Administration Building computer room in the Finance and Accounting Department be cooled by a separate air conditioning unit salvaged from the remodel of the old Administration Building. The cost to cool the room before this proposal was $23,914 because the whole building was being cooled, and after implementation of this suggestion it was reduced to $1,675; a $22,239 annual savings. The proposed cash award for this suggestion for the maximum of $1,500 to employee Glen Ripley was approved. PRIDE No. 205 - Belt Press Area Auto Wash System. Through installation of an automatic wash system in the belt press area, operator clean-up of sludge will be simplified, saving time, and a slip and fall hazard will be removed. A cash award of $376 was approved for Daniel Houck for this process and safety suggestion. PRIDE No. 207 - HVAC Conservation. This suggestion recommends that the heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) system at the purchasing offices and Building A be off 24-hour operation and operated during hours that coincide with use $5,170 in power costs. Rick Russell was awarded $517 for this energy saving idea. PRIDE No. 209 - Failsafe. As an additional back-up to the Plant No. 2 computer monitoring system, this suggestion recommends installation of plastic strips on air conditioning vents to visually demonstrate air flow to an operator outside of the computer room. The minimum award of $100 for this equipment safety suggestion was approved for Robert Livingston. PRIDE No. 211 - New Basin Structure Lighting. This suggestion recommended installation of area lighting at M, N and P basins, to eliminate dark areas along the back roadway adjacent to the basins to improve visibility in the area and to increase safety. The safety suggestion minimum $100 payment was awarded to Frank P. Chavez. 2. PROPERTY, BOILER & MACHINERY AND LIABILITY INSURANCE. Over the past few months, the Committee has been reviewing the Districts' insurance practices and last month directed staff to solicit proposals from nine brokers to provide property insurance. A screening committee composed of the Districts' Financial Manager, General Counsel , insurance consultant and the City of Anaheim Risk Manager has reviewed each of the proposals and interviewed four of the brokers. Two of the firms were invited to the Committee meeting to make presentations in accordance with the Fiscal Policy Committee's previous directions. Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee ' Page 3 April 15, 1992 �J Prior to the firms' presentations, the Committee reviewed the enclosed staff report (tan) and the selection process for the four firms on the screening committee short list. The Committee also reviewed the proposals of the two firms invited to the meeting and the enclosed (white) memorandum report of the screening committee. Recommendation The Committee recommends that Robert F. Driver Associates be selected as broker of record for the all-risk property, earthquake and boiler & machinery insurance program. The results of the broker's marketplace investigation and evaluation will be brought to the Boards for consideration in July 1992. The Committee also recommends that the broker be compensated for the initial insurance coverage or placement based on the insurance industry's standard commission practice, and that staff be authorized to negotiate a fee-for- services-agreement for subsequent brokerage services. 3. MEMORANDA OF UNDERSTANDING CLASSIFICATION STUDIES. During the meet-and-confer process for the three-year Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) with the Districts' employee groups and the process of restructuring the management and supervisory team, both approved by the Joint Boards last year, the Districts recognized the need for certain classification studies. Some of those studies have been completed and should be implemented. Recommendation The Committee recommends approval of the Collection Facilities Division Classification Study and the Information Services Division Programmers Classification Study (in the confidential envelope) . The changes would be effective May 29, 1992. 4. 1992-93 PERSONNEL BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS. The Committee reviewed staff's proposed changes in authorized personnel for 1992-93. A net reduction of five positions with a top-of-the-range net budget reduction of $3,180 is proposed despite new or expanding programs, treatment plant processes and equipment. Staff reported on the estimated savings from an Operations Division proposal to implement a 12-hour per day work schedule (7-80) in place of the current 9-hour per day schedule (9-80) on a trial basis for one quarter of the work force for 1992-93. The recommended personnel budget for 1992-93 will be forwarded to the Executive Committee in May with the complete Joint Works Budget proposal . Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 4 April 15, 1992 5. INTEREST RATE MONITORING/SUMMARY OF SWAP EARNINGS. The financing team continues to monitor the interest cost and investment earnings of the 1990-92 Capital Improvement Program, Series A and B COP Issues and to make monthly reports to the Committee. The Committee reviewed a staff report which provides the details for the following summary and reviews the potential of the three-year SWAP at April 7, 1992: COP Average Total Net True Interest Interest Interest Interest Interest Paid Rate Paid Earned Earnings Cost Series A $ 4,690,144 3.274% $ 6,685,660 $1,995,516 (1.427%) Series B 7,392,250 6.860% 6,791,669 (600,582) .5705. Combined $12,082,394 4.827% $13,477,329 $1,394,934 ( .348%) 6. REVISED 1991-92/2000-01 CASH FLOW PROJECTIONS. During the discussion of the proposed 1990-92 Capital Improvement Program Certificates of Participation, Series C Issue at the last Committee meeting, the Directors inquired about the effect on sewer use fees. Staff presented to the Committee revised cash flow projections incorporating the recently approved preliminary CORF Budget for 1992-93, a "hold-the-line" Joint Works Operations and Maintenance Budget for 1992-93 and the currently projected borrowing schedule. The projected use fees resulting from these revised estimates can be found on the enclosed Selected Projected Cash flow Highlights (salmon) which also reports the revised projections for each District's share of joint operating expenses, repayment of COP borrowing, share of CORF, new COP issues/borrowing and ending total reserves. Of course, the 1992-93 use fees have now been set at the same level as the 1991-92 fees pending resolution of AB 3214, the proposal to remove ad valorem property taxes from enterprise special districts, and other economic considerations. For other years through 2000-01, the newly projected fees range from $10 to $110 per year less than those projected during the 1991-92 budget process, due primarily to delaying of certain construction projects. 7. APPROVING AGREEMENTS WITH CONSULTING FINANCE TEAM FIRMS RE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, 1990-92 SERIES C CERTFICATES OF PARTICIPATION. After several Committee discussions, a formal underwriter selection process and Special Bond Counsel interviews by the General Counsel , the Fiscal Policy Committee recommended and the Boards approved a financing team for the COP Issues for the 1990-92 Capital Improvement Program. This team consists of the Districts' Director of Finance and Financial Manager; Merrill Lynch as Underwriter; Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander & Ferdon as Co-Special Counsel with Rourke & Woodruff; Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe as Underwriter's Counsel , and the Fiscal Policy Committee. Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee ° Page 5 April 15, 1992 ../ The enclosed (gray) staff report reviewing the very positive results that this team has produced was discussed by the Committee. Recommendation The Committee recommends approval of the following agreements for Series C: • Authorization of staff to negotiate an agreement with Merrill Lynch to serve as Underwriter for an amount not to exceed $5.95/$1,000 for a variable rate issue, or $9.95/$1,000 for a fixed rate issue. • Approval of an agreement with Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander and Ferdon to serve as Co-Special Bond Counsel for an amount not to exceed $80,000 for a variable rate issue, or $100,000 for a fixed or mixed rate issue plus out-of-pocket expenses, etc. e Approval of an agreement with Rourke & Woodruff to serve as Co-Special Bond Counsel , apart from General Counsel services, for an amount not to exceed $7,500. GGS:lc REF:FPC92/RFPC4.15-19 Enclosures ` COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS r of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA April 9, 1992 10944 ELLI9 AVENUE VC.9CR 11127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-9127 STAFF REPORT 714I992-2411 PROPERTY, BOILER AND MACHINERY AND LIABILITY INSURANCE BROKER SELECTION PROCESS At the last meeting, the Fiscal Policy Committee reviewed staff's progress on the broker selection process for all-risk property, boiler & machinery and liability insurance. The following milestones have been met since the March meeting: ° Request for Qualifications were mailed to the attached list of nine broker firms approved by the Fiscal Policy Committee. ° The Newport Beach and Anaheim Risk Managers were contacted regarding their participation in the Districts' broker selection process. Tom Vance, the City of Anaheim Risk Manager, agreed to assist the Districts in the broker selection process. Mr. Vance is currently serving as President of PRIMA, a public risk management association and is widely recognized for his many years of experience as a public risk manager. ° Proposals were received from eight of the nine firms. ° The eight proposals were distributed to the screening committee: Patti Gorczyca, Districts' Financial Manager; Tom Woodruff, General Counsel ; Don Voller, Districts' insurance consultant; and Tom Vance, City of Anaheim Risk Manager. The screening committee ranked the proposals using the Criteria for Evaluating Insurance Brokers reviewed at the March Committee meeting (copy attached) . ° The screening committee agreed upon a short list of firms to be interviewed by the screening committee on April 10. The four top ranked firms were Arkwright, Robert F. Driver, Johnson & Higgins and Sedgwick James. ° Reference checks were performed on the four firms to be interviewed and interview questions were developed. After the screening committee interviews, up to four of the firms will be invited to the Fiscal Policy Committee meeting. The Fiscal Policy Committee has requested to interview the top rated firms and select two firms to engage in competitive marketing of the Districts' property, boiler & machinery and possibly liability insurance requirements, in accordance with specifications of the Districts. Staff will mail , under separate cover, a package of materials to the Committee prior to the meeting to assist in the interview process and selection of two brokers. The package will include the following: Insurance Broker Selection Process Page 2 April 9, 1992 1. Copies of the proposals. 2. A matrix depicting the screening committee's rankings of the eight responding firms. 3. A matrix depicting the ranking of the four firms after the completion of interviews and reference checks. 4. A list of potential interview questions for consideration by the Committee during the presentation. 5. A rating matrix for use (if desired) by the Committee members during the interviews. The Committee broker interview process is scheduled to begin at 6:00 p.m. after the light dinner. Each firm will be allowed 15 minutes to introduce themselves and to highlight their qualifications and experience. The Committee may then interview each firm as desired for an additional 15 minutes. Two firms will then be selected to proceed with the competitive marketing of the Districts' property, boiler & machinery and possibly liability insurance program. PG:GGS:lc REF:FIN/FPC92/sRFPC4.3-4 �r VOLLHR, SAVAGE & ASSOCIATES Ingww a and Risk Mampment Consulting P. O. Banc 10876 [aendwia, Arizona MIS F�Si. age 7deolm - (6= 9R-9689 � PAX HIoa (6079 972-9689 March 9, 1992 Ms. Patti Gorczyca COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 INSURANCE BROKER LIST Dear Patti: Thus far I have developed the following list of candidates for the Districts to invite to a screening process: Sedgwick James 18201 Von Karmen Ave, Suite 800 Irvine, CA. 92713 Contact: Mr. Leon Holmes Robert F. Driver Associates 3636 Birch Street, Suite 230 Newport Beach, CA. 92660-2619 Contact: Mr. Ted Davidson Arkwright Insurance Company One World Trade Center, Suite 1500 Long Beach, CA. 90831-1500 Contact: Mr. Ric Lyon Johnson & Higgins of Orange County 695 Town Center Drive Suite 700 Costa Mesa, CA. 92626 Contact: Mr. Rory O'Farrell Calsurance 333 City Boulevard West Orange, CA. 92668 Contact: Mr. Mike Bogan Ms. Patti Gorczyca March 9, 1992 Page 2 Marsh & McLennan, Inc. 4695 MacArthur Court Suite 550 Newport Beach, CA. 92660 Contact: Mr. Roger Smith Coast Insurance Agency 11611 San Vicente Boulevard Suite 720 Los Angeles, CA. 90049 Contact: Mr. Dick Beckendorf Armstrong Robitaille P. O. Box 1649 2211 W. Orangewood Ave. Orange, CA. 92667 Contact: Ms. Karen Bender Akasaka, Ortiz & Varela 333 City Boulevard West Suite 200 Orange, CA. 92668 Contact: Mr. Al Lum Patti , I consider this to be a very good representative list of prospective brokers for the District. They are all strong firms and together write a very major percentage of the public entity business in the county. Yours very truly, � f� Donald J. Voller COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING INSURANCE BROKERS Score Weiaht Total o Creativity/Resourcefulness x .05 -- Client focused -- Evidence of innovation -- Dynamic o Technical Skills/ Thoroughness of Analysis x .10 -- Awareness of key risk issues -- Reasonableness of comments/recommendations o Depth/Breadth of Team x .20 -- Number of staff members in critical areas -- Experience with similar accounts/risks -- Compatibility with style/philosophy of Districts -- Availability of key people -- Expertise in key risk areas (Property, B6N) ' o Servicing Strategy -- Resourcing (adequacy) x .10 -- organization of service team -- Backup within service team -- Coordination (within service team and Districts) -- Communication plans (to Districts' staff) o Availability of Specialist Resources x .50 -- Leverage in insurance marketing -- Niche market awareness/access (i.e. , E.Q. ) -- Risk control/services (loss prevention and claim) -- Computer systems -- Alternative risk expertise (knowledge of funding options) o Remuneration Approach x .05 -- Formal system or basis -- Openness to negotiate �. �_� OVERALL EVALUATION: 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS April 14, 1992 d ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10960 EUM AV E Ra.9ox 9127 F WNIAiN VALEV,CAUMWA 92)2"12] n1m9922An M E M O R A N D U M TO: Fiscal Policy Committee SUBJECT: Screening Committee Insurance Broker Interview Results The insurance broker selection process was designed to provide the Districts the opportunity to review and evaluate three distinctively different insurance brokerage and insurer types. Each type of firm offers different strengths to the Districts' risk management program. The three types of firms are: Major National or Regional Full Service Broker Local Broker . Direct Writing Property Insurer The major national or regional full service broker type was represented by Robert F. Driver, Sedgwick James, Johnson & Higgins and Marsh & McLennan. These firms represent substantial marketing strength and in many cases can be "market makers" through their huge volume of business. They can lead the industry in product development and developing coverage approaches. This type of firm possesses excellent in-house staff covering a range of insurance disciplines. Their technical staffs can provide direct service to the client, augment Districts' staff expertise and advocate on behalf of the Districts on coverage matters. They can provide specialized assistance in property loss prevention. The local broker type was represented by Coast; Arkasaka, Ortiz and Varela; and Armstrong Robitaille. These firms are significantly smaller and generally cannot afford many of the in-house services routinely provided by the major brokers. The local brokers, because of local ownership, tend to maintain staff stability and are generally known for service. These firms generally cannot reach as much of the market as larger brokers and often have strong relationships with a few key insurers capable of providing key insurances. Often they will develop a market niche and become local experts in specialized risks. The direct writing insurer type was represented by Arkwright, a specialist in property and boiler and machinery and a leader in the development of insurance forms and loss prevention techniques. These direct writing firms possess major insurance capacity and when clients are in compliance with their loss prevention standards, are very competitive from a cost standpoint. r Insurance Broker Interview Results Page 2 April 14, 1992 The drawbacks of this type of firm are: ° The client must have sophisticated insurance staff to work with a direct writer without the assistance of an insurance broker. ° These firms can embrace a certain approach to insurance coverage and can be inflexible. They do not always meet the current needs of every client. ° While their loss prevention staffs are generally considered top notch, they are often rigid in their approach to property loss prevention. Clients do not have a technical advocate through an independent broker and may find that property protection requirements can be unreasonable. The insurance broker screening process focused on those capabilities and services of greatest importance to the Districts: ° Substantial market leverage to place the large insurance capacity required by the Districts. ° Strong technical insurance knowledge and creativity. ° Experience with risks of similar exposure to the Districts. ° Technical expertise in the area of loss prevention with the ability to assist the Districts directly and to advocate on the Districts' behalf with program insurers. On the basis of these criteria, four firms were invited to be interviewed by the screening committee consisting of Don Voller, Districts' insurance consultant; Tom Woodruff, General Counsel ; Tom Vance, the City of Anaheim Risk Manager; and Patti Gorczyca, Financial Manager. The following highlights the attributes of each firm, as well as the screening committee's findings. Robert F. Driver This firm is a major factor in the public sector, not only in Orange County, but throughout the state. Ninety percent of the premiums written by this firth come from the public sector. In addition, their business is composed of a large book of both property and boiler and machinery insurance. One of their major clients is City of San Diego which owns and operates the Point Loma sewage treatment plant and the firm has been very active in the claim process on their recent major break in the outfall . They demonstrated a very good understanding of the sanitation business and its specialized insurance needs. They suggested a number of creative changes that could enhance the Districts' program addressing boiler and machinery, "all risk" property, and earthquake insurance. They have an experienced insurance brokerage staff and a qualified property loss protection engineer as part of their operation. Insurance Broker Interview Results Page 3 April 14, 1992 \� One very significant advantage of this broker is their understanding of the problems associated with the insurance for cogeneration facilities. They have placed a number of such facilities, including substantial facilities for the City of Anaheim. Given the potential problem facing the Districts in the renewal of the boiler and machinery coverage because of the oncoming cogeneration facilities, an in-depth understanding by the insurance broker is critical . The firm also offered some solid recommendations about modifications to the boiler and machinery coverage involving equipment to be insured and the application of earthquake provisions. Driver felt that the earthquake market would afford sufficient limits to provide for the Districts' requirements. Driver also indicated that a wide range of deductibles were available on earthquake including aggregate deductibles. The firm advised that the Districts should replace existing fidelity coverage with a broader coverage referred to as faithful performance. The faithful performance coverage does not require the existence of willful misconduct on the part of the employee and is readily available at comparably reasonable premiums. With respect to the issue of more than one broker in the market, Driver felt that it was possible as long as the limit was restricted to $35 million as part of the competitive process. They felt, however, that a better result could be achieved by having only one broker market the earthquake insurance. This firm was ranked number one by all four raters and received an average of 4.42 out of a perfect 5.00 score. Sedgwick James This firm is the third largest broker in the world and the largest in Orange County. They are owned by a major London broker and own a separate U.S. surplus lines broker. Such facilities give them substantial clout in the market. For example, they have two contracts in the London market to write pollution liability. The firm employs a National Director of Environmental Insurance. In the past, the Orange County office of Sedgwick wrote a substantial amount of public entity business, but in the last several years have largely relinquished that market. The loss prevention and safety staff of Sedgwick appears sound and would be a good resource for the Districts. One significant weakness, though, is the lack on the part of the local office of any familiarity with cogeneration insurance issues. Sedgwick has a National Utility Group which tends to mitigate the lack of knowledge on the part of the local staff, but it would not be a total offset for local knowledge. It could work against the Districts in those cases where quick answers may be required or where on-site help would be valuable. Sedgwick confirmed the general scope of the earthquake insurance market but was the most vocal in cautioning the Districts against having two brokers in the market on a competitive basis. Sedgwick felt that two brokers could access the market, but that it could cost the Districts additional money. Insurance Broker Interview Results Page 4 April 14, 1992 Segwick James was rated number two by all four raters and received an average score of 3.88. This firm was rated second primarily due to their lack of current involvement in public business and their lack of local knowledge about cogeneration facilities coverage. Arkwright/Hobbs Group This direct writing insurer was invited because of its extremely strong reputation in property insurance and loss prevention. This firm represented a strong alternative to working solely with brokers. The Arkwright/Hobbs Group believes that they are "leading edge" with respect to the development of insurance coverage forms and loss prevention techniques. Their technical staffs are extensive and all have a top reputation in the marketplace. The Arkwright owns a brokerage firm, the Hobbs Group. The Arkwright would write the "all risk" property and the boiler and machinery, but the Hobbs Group would be used to place earthquake insurance in the outside market and to review the liability market for environmental insurance. The Arkwright appears to have a strong understanding of cogeneration problems and does insure a number of cogeneration facilities. Their recent experience, however, has caused them to be cautious in their approach and they generally require a high deductible, but probably one that is not out of line with the rest of the market. The Hobbs Group staff concurred in the earthquake assessment offered by the other firms, but didn't appear to have a very strong grasp of the total earthquake marketplace. This is a strongly qualified group of people and one that offers the Districts very strong loss prevention service. Of concern to the screening committee is the fact that this firm has a limited approach to the construction of insurance programs, basically, they do it the Arkwright way. This can be valuable in a given case, but it would appear that the Districts' programs needs a more creative approach having been static for so many years. In addition, the Factory Mutual Group, of which this firm is a member, would do the bulk of the loss prevention work and tend to be hard line in their approach to physical plant recommendations. The Districts may not be totally well served without the existence of the independent technical advocate role that would be available through a broker. This firm was ranked third and received an average 3.55 score. Johnson & Higgins The local office of Johnson & Higgins is substantial in size and generally has all of the technical resources needed to properly service large complex organizations. 1` / �a.r/ Insurance Broker Interview Results Page 5 April 14, 1992 Johnson & Higgins confirmed the general capacity of the earthquake market and viewed it overall as "still soft." They further confirmed the existence of lower deductibles and the availability of an aggregate cap on deductible cost. They suggested that if two brokers were introduced into the market, that the initial earthquake limit be restricted to $25 million instead of $35 million. Johnson & Higgins appeared to have a general understanding of the cogeneration market but did not have a grasp of the extent to which earthquake coverage could be provided. The firm does have a local loss prevention capability but there is some question as to the capability as it relates to wastewater processing. Johnson & Higgins appears to have a good grasp of the environmental market, but seemed at a loss as to the overall market for liability insurance for public entities. This office of Johnson & Higgins has very little exposure to public business and it was demonstrated in the interview. They did bring with them an individual from their Dallas office that is part of their National Government Group. He appeared knowledgeable, but had only been with Johnson & Higgins for a week and will probably be spread thin for some time. This is a strong firm, but they appear to possess the most limited knowledge about the public sector and some of the specific differences that exist in the insurance market with respect to public operations. This firm was ranked fourth and received an average 3.43 score. Conclusions The screening committee unanimously determined that the Robert F. Driver firm is clearly the most experienced in both public sector and large wastewater treatment brokerage services. The Driver firm also demonstrated greater creativity and expertise and offered numerous innovative approaches for addressing the Districts' programs. Sedgwick James appears to have significant marketing capabilities through their London affiliations and appeared to have strong overall credentials. Their major weaknesses are their lack of local understanding of cogeneration operations and their recent absence from the public sector insurance market. Although having a strong reputation in property insurance and loss prevention, the Arkwright focus may be too limited for the Districts' risk management program in its current stage of development. A firm such as the Arkwright provides more limited broker and program consulting services. The committee felt strongly that the Districts' risk management interests would be better served by firms such as RobertF. Driver, Sedgwick James or Johnson & Higgins which can offer the independent technical advocate and consultant services to the Districts' program. Overall , Johnson & Higgins appeared stronger in the private sector and, therefore, was not as responsive to public concerns as the other participants. Insurance Broker Interview Results Page 6 April 14, 1992 Recommendation After considering the advice of the brokers interviewed with respect to the availability of earthquake insurance, the steering committee recommends that the most favorable course for the Districts is to select one "broker of record." That broker could then structure the market to maximum advantage. The screening committee unanimously felt the selection process was very thorough and that the process produced the two best qualified firms for selection of one as "broker of record." PG:lc REF:FIN/FPC92/N4FPC.IN51-6 4/9192 SELECTED PROJECTED CASHFLOW HIGHLIGHTS ISTRIC 91_92 92_93 93_94 94_95 95_96 5,91-96 9696=97 931-98 98-99 99=00 00.01 SHARE OF JOINT OPERATING 1 4.755,000 5.283,000 6,547,000 6,102.000 6,712,000 28.399,000 7,383,000 8,121,000 8,933,000 9.828,000 101809.000 2 14,868,000 18,520.000 17,347.000 19,082,000 20,990,000 88,807.000 23,089,000 25,388.000 27,938.000 30,732,000 33,805,000 3 14,391,000 15,990,000 16,790,000 18,489,000 20.316.000 85,956,000 22,348,000 24,583,000 27,041,000 29,745,000 32,720,000 5 1.725,000 11916.000 2,012,000 2,213.000 2,434,000 10,300.000 2,677.000 2,945,000 3.240,000 3,564,000 3.920,000 6 2,409,000 2,677,000 2.811,000 3,092,000 3,401,000 14,390,000 3,741,000 4,115,000 4,527,000 4,980,000 5,478,000 7 3,053,000 3,392,000 3,562,000 3,918,000 4,310,000 18,235,000 4,741,000 5.215,000 5,737,000 6.311,000 8,942.000 11 2,733,000 3.037,000 31189,000 3,508.000 3.859,000 16,326,000 4,245,000 4,670,000 5,137,000 5,651.000 6,216,000 13 392.000 435.000 457.000 503.000 553,000 2.340.000 608,000 669.000 736.000 810.000 891,000 14 702,000 780,000 919,000 901.000 991,000 4.193,000 11090,000 1.199,000 1,319,GG0 1,451.000 1,5961000 TOTAL 45.028,000 50.030.000 52,534,000 57,788,000 63.556,000 268,946.000 69.922.000 76,915.000 84,608,000 93,070.000 102,377.000 COP SERVICE 1 3,878,000 3,862,000 4,516,000 5,255,000 6.277,000 23,788,000 7,042,000 7,042,000 7,042,000 7,042,000 7,042,000 2 9,848,000 9,820.000 11,132,000 13,335.000 15,529.00O 59.664.000 16,579,0G0 1615331000 16.548,000 18,556,000 16.558,000 3 8,838,000 8,807,000 10,881,000 13,530,000 16,889,000 58,945,000 18,657,000 18.606,857 18,623,267 18,631,473 18,631.473 5 1,971LODO 1,978,000 2,248,000 2.518.000 2,833,000 11,555,000 3,193,000 3,193,000 3.193,000 3,193.000 3,193,000 8 921,000 921,000 1,528,500 2,095,500 2,748,000 8,214,000 3,310,500 3,310,500 3,310,500 3,310,500 3,310,500 7 1,792.000 1,792.000 2,827,000 3,727,000 4,627,000 14.765,000 5,527,000 5,527,000 5,527.000 5,527,000 5.527,000 11 11690,000 1,690,000 2,725,000 3,400,000 4,075,000 13,580,000 4,705,000 4,705,000 4,705,000 4,705,000 4,705,000 13 29,000 28.000 28,OG0 28,000 28,000 140,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 14 165,000 165,000 165,000 165,000 165,000 825,000 165,000 155,000 135.000 165.000 165,000 TOTAL 29,138,000 29.063.000 36,050,500 44.053,500 53,171,000 191.476,000 59,206,500 59.110.357 59,141,767 59,157,973 59,157,973 SINGLE FAMILY ANNUAL USE FEE 1 75 75 90 120 140 160 160 165 165 170 2 SO 60 70 80 90 100 105 105 110 115 3 SO 60 65 75 85 85 90 90 95 95 5 75 75 80 95 90 95 100 105 110 155 6 65 65 70 75 80 85 100 125 140 155 7 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 45 SO 55 11 SO 60 65 70 75 85 100 115 130 145 13 1G0 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 105 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AVERAGE 60 60 67 77 85 91 96 1G0 105 ill CF 92B 1.%LS 9:49AM 4/9192 SELECTED PROJECTED CASHFLOW HIGHLIGHTS DISTRICT 91-92 92=93 93_94 9495 95-96 I 5 yr 91-96 I 98_97 97_99 98=99 994)0 00-01 SHARE OF CORF 1 7,775,000 813581000 9,445,000 10,365.000 7,725,000 43,668.000 4.618,000 3,832,000 3,832.000 3,832,000 3,832,000 2 23,070,000 24,802,000 28,028,000 30,757.000 22.924,000 129.579.000 13.704,000 11.372,000 11,372,000 11,372,000 11,372,000 3 24.215.000 26,033,000 29.417,000 32,284,000 24,062.000 136.011,000 14,384.000 11,937.000 11,937,000 11.937,000 11,937.000 5 3,460,000 3,719,000 4,203,000. 4,613,000 3,438,000 19,433.000 2,055,000 1,705,000 1.705.000 1,705,000 1,705, 0 5 4,217,000 4.534,000 5,123,000 5.622,000 4,191,000 23.687.000 2,505,000 2.079,000 2.079.000 2.079,000 2,079,000 7 5,555.000 5,972,000 6,749,000 7,406.000 5.520.000 31.202.000 3.300,000 2,738.000 2,738,000 2.738,000 2,738,000 11 4.700,000 5.053.000 5,710,000 6,266,000 4.670,000 26,399,000 2,792,000 2,317.000 2,317.000 2,317.000 2,317,000 13 508,000 546,000 617,000 677,000 505.000 2.853.000 302.000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 14 1,500.000 1,613,000 1,822.000 2.000.000 1,491,000 8,426,000 1 891,000 739.000 739,000 739.000 739,000 TOTAL 75,000,000 80,630,000 91,112,000 99,990,000 74.526.000 421,258.000 44,551,000 36,969,000 36.969.000 36,969,000 36.969,000 NEW BORROWING 1 0 7,500,000 B,50D,000 8,500,000 B,500,000 33,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 15,000,000 25,000,000 25,000,000 12,000,000 77,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 23,500.000 30,000,000 38,000,000 20,000,000 111.500,000 0 0 - 0 0 0 5 0 3.000.000 3,OOO,000 3,SOO,O00 4,000,000 13,500.000 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6,750,000 6.300,000 7,250,000 6.250,000 28,550.000 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 11,500,000 10.000.000 10,000,000 10.000.000 41.500,000 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 11,500,000 7,500,000 7,500,000 7,000.000 33,SOO,000 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 O 1 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 78,750,000 90,300,000 99,750,000 67,750,000 336.550.000 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RESERVES 1 23.910.000 21,393,000 21.017,000 20,657,000 23,868.000 23.869,000 22,753,000 22,170,000 21.718,000 20,997,000 20,330,000 2 86,284,000 83,309,000 89,528,000 94,045,000 95.837.000 95.837.000 96,636,000 100,734.000 104,401,000 108,976.000 114,465.000 3 86,039,000 92,908,000 100,128,000 105,583,000 112.894.000 112.894,000 105,912.000 103,948.143 99,959,876 96,299,403 91,426.930 5 23,033,000 22,895,000 21,137,000 21,470,000 20.845,000 20,845,000 19,122,000 17.W.000 18,045,000 14,297,000 13,522.000 6 10.285,000 12.612,500 14,424.000 14.278.000 15,361,500 15,361,500 11,633,000 8,523,500 6,150,000 4.212,500 2.714,000 7 33,512.000 37.642.000 40,911.000 43.874,000 47,834,000 47.834.000 46,504,000 45.622.000 45,169,000 45.176,000 45,676.000 11 17.731,000 19,041.000 21.983.000 20.470.000 20.791.000 20,791,000 17,752.000 15,575,000 13,810,000 12.468.000 11,554,0D0 13 9.424,000 8,549,000 7,789.000 7,157,000 61990,000 6,990,000 7.267,400 8,0U1,900 9,215.200 10,985,600 13.457,000 14 4,884.000 2,235.000 2,768,000 2,470,000 2,788.000 2,788.000 3,012.000 3.342,000 3,727.000 4.191,000 4,829.000 TOTAL 295.102.000 300.584.500 319,683,000 330.012,000 347,208.SO0 347.208.500 331.621,400 325,559,443 320,195,076 317,602,503 317,973,930 CF 92B 1.%LS 9:49AM COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS April 9, 1992 0 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA STAFF REPORT 'AAA CIS AWNO2 P0.90%8127 FOUNTAIN VAI .G IPDPNIA SMM127 O141M22 11 \/ Agreements with Consulting Financing Team Members For Capital Improvement Program 1990-92 - Series C Certificates of Participation BACKGROUND At the conclusion of a formal selection process in 1990, the Fiscal Policy Committee recommended and the Boards approved the selection of Merrill Lynch as Senior Managing Underwriter and Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander & Ferdon as Co-Special Counsel with Rourke & Woodruff for the Capital Improvement Program 1990-92 Certificates of Participation. Following consultation with the financing team, Merrill Lynch selected Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe as Underwriter's Counsel . This team, along with the Fiscal Policy Committee and staff, very successfully planned, structured, marketed and sold the $100,000,000 Capital Improvement Program, 1990-92 Series A Variable Rate Certificates of Participation Issue in December 1990, and the Series B Fixed Rate Issue in April 1991. In the months subsequent to these sales, the Fiscal Policy Committee has regularly reviewed the actual net interest cost or earnings of these issues and of the three-year SWAP related to the Series B Issue. The financing team has been able to bring the Series A and B Issues to the marketplace with excellent ratings and has obtained an AA rating from Moody's for our COP program, equivalent to the State of California general obligation bond rating. At the March meeting, the Committee reviewed the preliminary structuring of the proposed 1990-92 Capital Improvement Program, Series C COP Issue (ivory attached), during which it was discussed that proposals from the outside consulting members of the finance team (Merrill Lynch, Underwriter; Mudge Rose, Co-Special Bond Counsel ; and Rourke & Woodruff, Co-Special Bond Counsel) , would be submitted to the Committee at this meeting for consideration. These consultants have worked very effectively with Districts' staff as a financing team to plan, structure, market and monitor the Series A and B COP Issues as evidenced by the monthly net interest cost summaries, Bond Buyer articles, and the recent certificate awarded by the National Federation of Municipal Analysts. CO-SPECIAL BOND COUNSEL Attached, for the Committee's consideration, is the proposed Mudge Rose letter agreement for Special Bond Counsel services (yellow) . Mudge Rose has again agreed to waive their hourly rate fee increase, thereby holding their hourly rates at the 1990 levels charged for the Series A and B Issues. The agreement also limits the firm to a total fee for two types of financing structures. Mudge Rose is proposing the same maximum amounts charged for the Series B Issue; a reduction from the fees charged for the Series A Issue. Under the agreement, an $80,000 cap would be in place if a variable-rate-only structure is utilized �/ and a $100,000 cap would be applied if a mixed structure is utilized. Selection of Financing Team Page 2 April 9, 1992 Mudge Rose will be separately reimbursed for costs and charges incurred in .J rendering services to the Districts. Reimbursement would cover reproduction, telephone, word processing, messenger, mail delivery, printing, preparation and binding of transcripts and travel and transportation charges and costs, if any. Such costs will be reimbursed at the time of billing for the related services at actual amounts. The letter agreement's proposed fee schedule is summarized as follows: Type of Fee Maximum Fee Series C Legal Services Variable Rate Only $ 80,000 Variable and Fixed Rates 100,000 Expenses At Cost Rourke & Woodruff has served as Co-Special Bond Counsel with Mudge Rose as well as General Counsel on both the Series A and B Issues. The enclosed (gold) memo proposes that Special Counsel services provided by Mr. Alan Watts and other members of the firm be limited to $7,500 and that General Counsel services provided by Mr. Woodruff be included within the present General Counsel Agreement. UNDERWRITER The Underwriter's compensation, referred to as gross spread, is typically negotiated within two weeks prior to the pricing and sale of an issue. However, Merrill Lynch has agreed (goldenrod enclosed) to a cap on gross spread of $5.95 per $1,000 for a variable-rate-only issue or for the variable rate portion of a mixed structure, and $9.95 per $1,000 cap for a fixed rate issue. These caps are equal to the rates paid for the variable rate Series A Issue in 1990 and for the fixed rate Series B Issue in 1991. A detailed analysis of the elements of gross spread, current market comparables for gross spread for COP issues in the last year, and a recommended gross spread will be presented to the Committee just prior to marketing the issue, probably during late July 1992. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Fiscal Policy Committee recommend that the Joint Boards approve the Series C COP Issue arrangements with the outside consulting finance team members. PG:lc REF:FIN/FPC91/SRFPC4.1-2 Attachment ... 3/12/1, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 1992 Series C Financing Preliminary Structuring Summary Structure 1 Structure 2 Series C1 Series C2 Series C Interest Rate Type: Fixed Rate Variable Rate 100% Variable (Possible Swap to Fixed For Districts 6,7 & 11) Sale Date: June July June/July Transaction Size: Up To$25,000,000 Up To Entire Transaction Size Approximately$100,000,000 Dependent Upon Rating Agencies ($75,000,000- $100,000,000) Term: 25-30 years 25-30 years 25-30 years Lien: Likely Subordinate Lien Subordinate Lien Subordinate Lien Structure: Certificates of Participation Certificates of Participation Certificates of Participation Credit Enhancement: Insured Bank Backed(Letter or Line) Bank Backed Ratings: AAA/Aaa Same As Selected Bank Same As Selected Bank Capitalized Interest: Possible District I Possible District I Possible District 1 Cap 1 or Escrow Cap I or Escrow Cap 1 or Escrow Reserve Fund: Standard None Expected None Expected Short/RITES Incorporated If Incorporated If Incorporated If Derivative Products: Presence Reduces Borrowing Cost Presence Reduces Borrowing Cost Presence Reduces Borrowing Cost (Possible Swap to Fixed) (Possible Swap to Fixed) MUDGE ROSE GUTHRIE ALEXANDER S FEROON Leo NPIo[x uxL SUITE 2020 MM.011 X,xM 10nX IOOJO Wy141001TOx.O.C.}OO]> },}.'Ioloo0 333 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 u "TL..RON,. �OO[ax)a {YnL l'SO 2 13-613-1 1 1 2 u{xonTx ruou'o'W[ NM w11X.N.v.Im w}[T N Lx }.}u]auoo — _ .m-oo-uoo w EI NILC xOgR[.MOLT[CL x.L _ I Ox[VII[I,IO...... OO.O Y"O�OU �[.11VL OR 4 Mlll >'c0[...n1.. 7 PAn61PI4Nv.NM J[M[T O)OM 111411.481..1.7. }OIO]Lg00. TO[wNONON])MO RI BUILDING { I LOIYNO..OR.Ox[.MINwTD XY IO XYO�O{.ING. EDWANO W. LONG .O]1].a)-eLai IAIR M[11 " 11213/pp gI CL51N'[R April 7, 1992 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 Attention: Mr. Gary Streed ...� Ladies and Gentlemen: We are proud to have served as Co-Bond Counsel in the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California highly successful $117,555, 000 Certificates of Participation Series B financing (the "Series B Financing") . The Series B Financing was the second issuance in the Districts' current financing program. At the request of Patricia Gorczyca of the Districts' Staff, we submit the following proposed arrangement for our services and compensation in connection with the planned third issuance in the current financing program (now projected for mid- 1992 in the approximate principal amount of $100 million) (the "Series C Financing") . The arrangement proposed herein is separate from the Districts' services agreements with Rourke & Woodruff. The Rourke & Woodruff services and compensation related to the financing program are to be as provided for under such agreements. If the Districts' accept this proposal, this letter will constitute the agreement between the Districts and Mudge Rose with respect to the matters covered hereby. Services to be Provided The Districts have been working with Mudge Rose and others in analyzing the Districts' financing needs and developing financing structures and plans for the current financing program. Different financing structures require bond counsel to prepare and review distinct documents and legal issues. Without detailing the specifics of the different structures being considered, we will provide the following services to the Districts in connection with the Series C Financing: * assist the Districts' in the review of financing structures proposed, and the selection of the actual structure to be used in the Series C Financing; and * advise the Districts concerning the relationship of the Districts' outstanding borrowings to the proposed Series C Financing structure; and * prepare or participate in the preparation of all documents, review all legal issues and render advice with respect to the structure selected by the Districts for the Series C Financing. Such documents would include, as needed, ordinances, resolutions, acquisition agreements, installment purchase agreements, interest rate swap agreements, trust agreements, purchase contracts, letters of credit, reimbursement agreements, resolutions, offering documents, legal opinions and closing papers. Individuals to Provide Services All services hereunder would be provided by personnel located in our Los Angeles Office (although, if needed, the resources of our other offices will be available) . Edward Long (Partner, Finance) and Brant Freer (Partner, Tax) directed the Mudge Rose services in the Series B Financing, and will continue to direct and be responsible for the Mudge Rose services to the Districts. Other attorneys located in the Los Angeles office will assist in providing the Mudge Rose services. Charges We propose that, in general, we be compensated for our services on the basis of billing rates of $225 per attorney hour and $85 per paralegal hour for the services provided. The foregoing rates shall remain in effect through calendar 1992 and be subject to adjustment thereafter in proportion to any overall increase after January 1, 1992 in our hourly rate structure. Based on that general approach, we propose that: 2 Services Our service charges with respect to the Series C Financing will be subject to a cap (set forth below) , which will limit the amount which we may charge the Districts for such services. The cap applies to ordinary services in the contemplated financing, and does not apply to charges for additional services required due to circumstances beyond the control of Mudge Rose such as substantial changes in the structure of the contemplated financing, material time delays, or adverse litigation or legislation. We will notify the Districts before expending any substantial time in providing any such additional services. The Districts are considering at this time two different structures for the Series C Financing: (a) a variable rate only structure, identical to that utilized in the Districts' 1990-92 Series A Financing (the "Variable Only Structure") ; and (b) a combination of a variable rate structure and a fixed rate structure, utilizing primarily obligations identical to the Districts' 1990-92 Series A Financing obligations but also a portion of senior, fixed rate obligations like the Series B Financing (the "Mixed Structure") . The number of hours of services required for Mudge Rose to complete the Series C Financing will vary depending upon which of the structures is utilized. We agree that the following cap amounts will apply to the Series C Financing: (a) if the Variable Only Structure is utilized, a cap of $80,000; (b) if the Mixed Structure is utilized, a cap of $100,000. We would forego billing for services with respect to the Series C Financing until the closing or until the financing is abandoned. Expenses Separately, we would be reimbursed for costs and charges incurred in rendering services to the Districts. Reimbursement would cover reproduction costs; telephone and telecopier charges; word processing charges; messenger, delivery and mail services; printing costs; preparation and binding of transcripts, if any; and travel and transportation costs; and similar charges and costs. We would bill for such charges and costs at the time of billing for the related services. 3 Termination This agreement may be terminated by either party at any time, without cause. In such event, the Districts agree to pay for all services rendered and related costs and charges incurred up to the time of notification of termination. -------------------------------- We thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal. If we may provide additional information, please do not hesitate to call upon me. If this proposal is acceptable to the Districts, please indicate your acceptance by returning to us a copy of this letter dated and signed by an authorized official of the Districts. Very truly yours, MUDGE ROSE GUTHRIE ALEXANDER & FERDON By Edward W. Long cc: Thomas Woodruff, Esq. ACCEPTED this day of 1992: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By Authorized Official 4 Stephen R.Coma Director Western Region Public Finance Debt Markets Group PAC..� 400 South Hope Street Merrill Lynch Suite 2020 Los Angeles,California 90071-2821 2136834696 FAX 213 683 4514 April 8, 1992 The Board of Directors Mr. Wayne Sylvester Mr. Gary Streed Ms. Patricia Gorczyca Ladies and Gentlemen: Merrill Lynch would be very pleased to have the opportunity to maintain our relationship with the Districts and continue to assist in the implementation of the Districts' Financial Plan. In regard to the contemplated Series C financing, we would propose that our compensation for underwriting the Districts' securities offering be negotiated near time of sale, subject to the following not-to-exceed limits: $9.95/$1000 for a fixed rate issue or portion thereof, and $5.95/$1000 for a floating rate issue or portion thereof. As always, these fees would be inclusive of our expenses and are contingent upon a successful sale of the Districts' securities. Again, we look forward to the opportunity to serve the Districts for Series C. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Stephen R. Coma COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 9I ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA ' IM44 ELLI9 AVENUE PO BOX 9$27 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.LAUEOANIA 92728.8127 March 16, 1992 0141962.2411 STAFF REPORT 1992 SUMMER WORK PROGRAM For several years, the Directors have authorized a Summer Work Program for reducing the backlog of painting, groundskeeping and general clean-up work around the treatment plant facilities. Attached are listings of typical work assignments. This type of work can best be accomplished in the summer because the weather is suitable and the temporary help (mostly students) is more readily available during those months. Last year the Boards authorized a maximum of 37 Part-Time Assistant positions, working for a flat fee of $6. 00 per hour. The total cost budgeted was not to exceed $225, 000.00, including labor, materials and supplies. This year once again we request authorization to hire a maximum of 37 people; and also request authorization for up to 8 temporary upgrades at a 5.5% salary rate increase for those existing full-time maintenance employees to be designated as temporary crew leaders, as in the past. It is proposed that the basic salary rate for the Part-Time Assistants be $6. 00 per hour and the maximum expenditure for the entire program not exceed $225, 000.00, including labor, materials and supplies. Anticipated costs from May 18 , 1992 through September 25 1992, and crew assignments, are summarized as follows: Salaries & Wages $150, 000.00 Materials & Supplies 75 , 000.00 Total $225, 000. 00 PLANT NO. 1 PLANT NO. 2 PUMP STATIONS TOTAL 10 Painters/2 Crews 15 Painters/3 Crews 25 Painters/5 Crews 4 Grounds /1 Crew 4 Grounds /1 Crew 8 Grounds /2 Crews 4 Helpers/1 Crew 4 Helpers/ 1 Crew 14 Total 19 Total 4 Total 37 Total PLANT NO. 1 SUMMER PROGRAM WORK SCHEDULE GROUNDS CREW 1. Center of Plant a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds. 2. North Side Tree Row on Ellis a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds. 3. Trees (Exit Road) a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds. 4. West Tree Row (Ward) Factory 21 a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds. 5. East Tree Row (Next to River) a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds. PLANT NO. 1 SUMMER PROGRAM WORK SCHEDULE TUNNEL PAINT AND CLEAN-UP CREWS 1. Diversion Structure a. Gate Stands b. Piping and Equipment 2. Plant Tunnels a. Clean b. Paint 3. Sedimentation Basins a. Piping and Drive Motors b. Walkways C. Final Basin Piping, Pumps, etc. 4. Aeration Basins a. Piping on Landing b. Exposed Tunnel Piping PLANT NO. 2 SUMMER PROGRAM WORK SCHEDULE ' TUNNEL PAINT AND CLEAN-UP CREWS 1. Oxygen Plant (Paint as Needed) a. Cold Boxes, LOX Tanks b. Piping and Equipment 2. Reactor Basins and Final Basins (Paint as Needed) a. Mixers and Piping b. Piping, Pumps and Motors 3 . Sedimentation Basins (Paint as Needed) a. Pump Rooms b. Piping and Pumps 4. Digesters (Paint) a. Piping b. ,Pump Rooms 5. Odor Control Equipment (Paint) a. Piping, Pumps, Motors 6. Buildings a. Clean b. Paint as Needed 7. Tunnels a. Clean b. Paint Piping as Needed PLANT NO. 2 SUMMER PROGRAM WORK SCHEDULE GROUND CREWS 1. Tree Row - North End (Behind Nursery) a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds. 2. Tree Row - West Side (Brookhurst) a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds. 3 . Tree Row - South End (Behind Warehouse and Sample Building) a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds. 4. Tree Row - East Side (River Bed) a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds. 5. Sludge Bed Area and Truck Wash a. .Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds. 6. Center of Plant (Basins, Digesters, Buildings, etc. ) a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds. 7. Right-of-Way (To Adams) PUMP STATION SUMMER PROGRAM WORK SCHEDULE GROUND, PAINT AND CLEAN-UP CREW 1. Structures - Exterior a. Clean b. Paint, as necessary 2. Structures - Interior a. Clean b. Paint, as necessary 3. Grounds a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS February 4, 1992 91 ORANGE COMM, CALIFORNIA 1W EW6 AVENUE PO BOX 0121 F WAIN VW V.Uuig1MA 82729A127 0149624m STAFF REPORT Potential Claim re Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities Job No. P1-33 Job No. P1-33, Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, was bid in October 1990 for $39.7 million. The project is now nearly complete and is in the testing and cleanup stage. A portion of this project included the construction of a large reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) network throughout the western part of Plant No. 1. The approximate contract value of this pipe work is $8 million. This work, which is complete, went poorly and as a result is the only major dispute with the contractor, Gust K. Newberg. Staff expects the contractor may file a claim in the amount of about $3.3 million. The pipeline settled after installation, causing joint failures which have been repaired. Significant field changes to the pipe bedding were made to prevent/reduce settlement, all of which added cost. None of the extra costs associated with the pipeline have been paid. These costs are the heart of the dispute. Prior to design, the Districts hired a soils consultant to take borings and analyze the soils. This information was used by the Districts' designer to prepare plans and specifications. During the installation of the RCP network it was also discovered that the subsurface soils were unsuitable and not adequate for pipe support. It was decided to remove the unsuitable sails below the pipeline and import rock to provide a stable foundation. Even with the removal of unsuitable soils, and the addition of geotech fabric for additional support, the pipeline still experienced settlement in most of the areas of installation. The settlement was not consistent throughout the pipeline network and was possibly a contributing factor to the numerous joint failures throughout the network. A second possible contributing factor is the method of pipe installation. The contractor took an exceptionally and significantly long time to do the work, which may have added to the settlement. The pipe network, consisting of dual 108-inch low pressure RCP pipe, was laid in a common trench. The trench was excavated, bedding material placed, then the pipe was installed. The subcontractor took months to do this, leaving the trench open all this time. Normally this would be a matter of weeks. Job No. P1-33 Staff Report February 4, 1992 Page 2 Staff continually requested that the work be expedited because of the impact to the plant. The Detailed Specifications provided general scheduling requirements, which were not met. This is now significant for reasons other than originally intended. It contributed to the pipe settlement. After the problems were discussed, staff requested a review by the original soils consultant and designers, and hired Dames and Moore to review the design and construction techniques. Dames and Moore found fault with both the design and the installation. The lack of construction progress, especially after the trench was excavated, contributed to foundation settlement. The peat-laden soils dried out and oxidized, losing strength. When the pipe and backfill were added, they settled over the next few months, even though the weight of the pipe and backfill was less than the original , removed earth. The contract-specified pipeline enters and exits two large junction box structures. The two referenced structures are both supported on concrete piles white the pipelines were specified to be supported by a granular bedding material. After a portion of the pipeline was installed it was discovered that differential settlement problems were occurring at the connections between the pipelines and one of the junction box structures (PEDB). This problem was solved by pressure grouting the area below the pipelines. The pipeline entering the remaining junction box structure (EJB) was modified before the installation in an attempt to alleviate similar differential settlement problems. This modification involved a change in pipeline profile and the addition of two large (108-inch) flexible couplings near the junction box (EJB). To date, the contractor has submitted invoices totaling about $3.3 million for the overexcavating, added rock support, ,joint repair, couplings and added equipment and labor. Unlike the recent Central Power Generation claim, the added work did not extend the contract. Most of the items are easily identified and staff believes a resolution will be possible. TMD:jt ENG/P1/33:SR1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CAOFORNIA 1p EWE AVENUE AQ WX 812) I WMN VLL .G4EQ8 8272 121 01418822X11 April 16, 1992 STAFF REPORT UPDATE ON STATUS OF DISTRICTS' REQUEST FOR EXCLUSION FROM SCAQMD'S PROPOSED MARKETABLE PERMIT PROGRAM CALLED ED RECLAIM On February 26, 199Z Districts staff informed the Executive Committee that the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) would, on March 5, 199Z consider their staffs recommendation to proceed with a rule making process that would significantly change the way that stationary air pollution sources will be required to manage their emissions. The new SCAQMD program called Regional Clean Air Incentives Market (RECLAIM) would obligate all sources to annually ratchet-down their emissions of oxides of nitrogen (NO,) by 8%u and reactive organic gases (ROGs) by 6% by adding new best available control technology (BACT), modifying their processes, decreasing or stopping their activities, or buying/trading emission credits. (At the March 5 meeting SCAQMD staff also added oxides of sulfur (SOJ, at 8.5% per year.) Districts staff advised the Executive Committee that because we have already committed to BACT or installed BACT and have no apparent options to modify our processes or "get- out-of-town," that we would eventually have to purchase emission credits from the open market under RECLAIM. The future availability and cost of emission credits is a complete unknown and for this reason our future ability to construct, operate and maintain our water pollution control facilities could be jeopardized. Because of this uncertainty, Districts staff stated that essential public services such as wastewater treatment plants should be exempted from the RECLAIM program and that they should instead be regulated under the existing SCAQMD command-and-control regulations that already obligate us to achieve increasingly stringent air quality standards. Districts' staff had, in fact, been in nearly continuous dialogue with SCAQMD staff prior to the Executive Committee meeting of February 26 and had successfully convinced the SCAQMD staff to take a position supporting our argument that certain essential public services be exempted from the RECLAIM program. 1 `v� Nevertheless, because of the uncertainties of the SCAQMD rule adopting process, at the February 26 meeting Districts staff emphasized to the Executive Committee that our position needed to be driven home to the SCAQMD Board of Directors. As a result, Districts Joint Chairman Mahoney was authorized and directed to send a letter to SCAQMD Chairman Wedaa that articulated the Districts' concerns. At the SCAQMD Board Meeting of March 5, Districts' Directors Mahoney, Hart and Cox in their various capacities as representatives of the Districts or other concerned interests provided oral testimony supporting the exclusion of essential public services from.the RECLAIM program. The SCAQMD Board took our input (and that of many others) under advisement at their meeting of March S. Unresolved at that time, the matter was taken up again on April 3. Representatives of public agencies, environmental groups and industry had provided a wide range of input ranging from enthusiastic endorsement of the essential public service exclusion to ardent opposition to excluding anyone from RECLAIM. While the clear majority of the SCAQMD Board is in favor of excluding most essential public services from RECLAIM there is a strident minority of the SCAQMD Board who oppose the exclusion. Their opposition rests primarily in their belief that there is no technical reason why essential public services should be exempted and because all sources should contribute their "fair share" to the goal of achieving regional air quality improvements.. We believe the minority's view is ill-founded because essential public services, by definition, are non-discretionary and must continue in service in the basin,', ie., they do not have the option of"getting-out-of-town." The SCAQMD Board has taken action that partially addresses our desire for complete �...� and unequivocal exclusion from RECLAIM. The majority of the Board believes that most essential public services should be exempted and as a result directed SCAQMD staff to consider this as they proceed with drafting the RECLAIM rules (which will be provided to the SCAQMD for consideration and adoption. The SCAQMD Board also directed SCAQMD staff to form a public advisory committee to provide consultation during rule making regarding excluding essential public services. But the SCAQMD Board stopped short of full endorsement of exempting all essential public services from RECLAIM. In particular they remained equivocal on the subject of the two existing waste-to-energy facilities operating in Long Beach and City of Commerce. The SCAQMD Board is;in essence, waiting for more information from their staff before making a final determination on these existing waste-to-energy facilities. There is still some room for interpretation about just how "directive" the SCAQMD Board has been to its staff regarding the exclusion of most essential public services from RECLAIM. In other words, the door is not completely shut; rather, its slightly ajar. For this reason Districts' staff will continue to closely monitor this issue during the next year as the RECLAIM rule-snaking process proceeds. Districts' staff is cautiously optimistic that the majority of the SCAQMD Board shares our view that most essential public services (and in particular wastewater treatment plants) should be exempted from 2 h RECLAIM. But there will continue to be some uncertainty about the outcome until the relevant RECLAIM rules have been finally adopted by the SCAQMD Board. Districts' staff will update the Executive Committee as the RECLAIM rule-making process unfolds. BPA/kmi REF#210028.rp 3 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT PUBLIC NOTICE OF AMENDMENTS TO PROPOSED RULE 111 DATE: March 31, 1992 TO: Persons Interested In Proposed Rule 111 FROM: Peter M. Greenwald �� District Counsel SUBJECT: Revisions To Proposed Rule 111 —Ex Parre Communications With . Members Of The South Air Quality Management District Board On March 25, 199Z a public workshop was conducted by South Coast Air Quality Management District 'District") staff regarding Proposed Rule 111. The proposed rule has been amended in response to comments received during and after the workshop. These amendments would exemot the following communications from the rule's disclosure requirements: — oral ex pane communications made to a Board member who is . . a speaker or panelist at a conference, convention, or social event which is open to the public; — oral ex pane communications made by (1) an individual representing a small business as defined by District Rule 102 or (2) by an individual acting solely on behalf of his or her self or family; and — any ex pane communications made by another Board member, personal staff of the Board member, or the officers or staff of any governmental entity or individual which appointed that Board member. In addition, written ex part¢ communications received by a Board member will now be filed by that member with the Clerk of the Board, rather than by the person who sent the communication. Also, oral ex pane disclosure reports and written communications will have to be filed with the Clerk within five days, instead of the previously proposed three days. Consistent with this change, any communications which occur within five days of final Board action will have to disclosed within 24 hours of their occurrence. Finally, a violation of this rule will only occur if a person knowingly and willfully fails to comply with its disclosure requirements. A copy of the amended rule is attached for your information. The amendments are identified in italics. Persons Interested In Proposed Rule 111 March 31, 1992 Page 2 The District Board is scheduled to hold a public hearing on this rule on May 1, 1992, at 10:30 am., at the District's Auditorium, 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar. If you have any questions concerning the proposed rule, as amended, please contact Ted Handel of my staff at (714) 396-2309 or myself at (714) 396-2303. Written comments regarding the rule may also be sent to Ted Handel, District Counsel's Office, SCAQMD, 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California 91765 and they will be forwarded to the Board for its consideration. Attachment PMG:TMH:pcIV f, March 31, 1992 (PR111b) PROPOSED RULE 111. EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS WITH MEMBERS OF THE SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT BOARD (a) Purpose This rule establishes requirements for disclosure of oral and written ex pane communications with members of the South Coast Air Quality Management District Board ('District Board"). (b) Definitions (1) EX PARTE COMMUNICATION means an oral or written communication from any person to a member of the District Board, other than a communication made to a Board member during the course of- (A) a public meeting of the District Board, a District public workshop-,; i (B) a District Board committee meeting, of a meeting of an District advisory committee established by statute or the District Board;or (C) a meeting of any state or local agency which has been publicly noticed in compliance with the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act (Government Code Section 11120 et seq.) or the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code Section 54950 et seq.). (2) NOTICE PERIOD means the period commencing with the issuance of any of the following public notices: (A) the 75-day notice of a public workshop for a District rule subject to Health and Safety Code Section 40440.7(a) or, if inapplicable,the 30-day notice of a hearing to consider a rule; (B) the 30 or 45-day notice,whichever is applicable, of a hearing to consider the adoption or revision of an air quality management plan; or (C) the first.public notice issued, or agenda posted, relating to the District Board's consideration of a policy, resolution or agreement. -1- , The notice period shall terminate when the District Board takes final action regarding the noticed matter. (3) SIGNIFICANT DISTRICT' PROCEEDING means any proceeding before the District Board involving: (A) adoption, repeal, or amendment of a rule; (B) adoption of an air quality management plan or revision thereto; or (C) adoption or approval of a policy, resolution, or agreement which establishes legally enforceable requirements that the District Board or Executive Officer determines may have a significant impact on air quality or emission limitations, or have significant social or economic impacts. (4) SMALL BUSINESS means a business which is independently owned and operated and meets the following criteria, or if affiliated with another concem, the combined activities of both concerns shall meet these criteria.• (A) the number of employees is 10 or less; and (B) the total gross annual receipts are$500,000 or less. (5) SUBSTANTIVE ISSUE means any issue other than procedural matters such as scheduling. (c) Requirements (1) Oral Ex Pane Communications - (A) Durint4he-netic"eFied-}'ar-e-si-,nifieattf-Distr 4-preceed ig; aay--person--whe-wakes--an--who--makes--an--ora4--er--�arre eommenieation-to--a-;nembeFo€ pertaining to-a-se✓3stantive-issue-in- tkat-proeee�itig-shah -disc}ose-the eomtnan}eat}orras-€oNows: Any person who makes an oral ex pane communication to a member of the District Board during the notice period for a significant District proceeding, which pertains to a substantive issue in that proceeding, shall disclose that communication as follows: (i) A report of the oral ex pane communication shall be filed with the Clerk of the District Board by the person who makes the oral ex pane communication to the .... -1- District Board member. The report shall be filed with the Clerk no later than the third fifth business day after the date on which the communication occurred. Reports of oral ex pane communications occurring on or after the thing fifth business day preceding the scheduled date of final Board action in a significant District proceeding shall be filed with the Clerk within 24 hours after the communication occurs, but no later than one hour before the commencement of the District Board meeting at which the proceeding is scheduled to be conducted. An oral ex pane communication report shall include the following: (al) the name of the person making the ex pane communication to a District Board member and the company, organization or agencv;4fafkw that person represents; (WI) the name of the District Board member to whom `-� the communication was made; (ell ) the date and time of the communication; (E/l7 the rule, air quality management plan or revision, policy, resolution or agreement which was the subject of the communication; and (eV) a wraplete--sammary- af—the-Tertions--4—ike eomtnanteat�otr-eonee�it�g-sabsiantwe-issues-in the---preeeeding description of the substantive issues addressed by the communication and the information and positions conveyed to the Board member. A copy of any written materials which were provided to the Board member during the oral ex pane communication shall be attached to the summary. j----An-oral-rx--Pane-eonnrnereicstien-to-n--Board-+rtembeF---- made-4f`a-peFsen-eating-solefyen4ti5-oF-he behalf-opan, -- behalf of-ssweal!-basinrss-es-defined-6y-Distfic+�tule- ---- need+totbe-disciase,4.p uantto-this-nele--- -3- (B) The Clerk of the District Board shall promptly provide a copy v of the written summary to each District Board member, place the summary in the administrative record, and make the summary available to any person upon request. (2) Written FxParte Communications - (A) Dui{ng{ke-netaCe-peF}ed-€aF-a-sagaificane Distiic{-p�eceedii3a, Aaypefsoa-++hosebmits-a-wr�iten-ez perte�otftmanicatiotrto-a rftetubef-ef--the--Disirae{-$oa�d-duuing-the-rretiee-period fer-a-- sigrefiearx-District�roeeed+rzg-whisk-peitaittiugs-too-substantive issue-irt-t4tat-proeeedittg-3ka}}-prevtde-a-espy-e€-sash-wr3ttea camntureieat+orrto-the-6-lerk o€-the€lis?�iet-Board--The-wflttea eomtaunicat€on-s}taFF-be--f}ed-v vtk�-the401er4i-ne-44tet,4he-th44 business-day-€oFFawing-its--sul�tnissiotr-to-the--District-$oa�d member----�Vi-itten-ems-perre-fommuuieatious-submitie�-to-a Dist�iEt--Boaid--tnembee-�n-�-a€te�-tl3e-tFxid--Fwsitaess-�av pfec�dina-the-scheduled-date-o€--finaF-Board--ac{ien-skaF}-Fx filed-+Hith--the--E�efFf-ao--Facer-than--24--bouts--afteF--the etfmfn+3uieationissubtftitiedto-theBoaid-tuember;-but-no}aeef � than-oue--hear-pfiof--to-�tbe-Board--[neetutg--at-which-the proceeding- -4becanduc4ed- Any District Board member who receives a written ex parte communication during the notice period for a significant District proceeding, which pertains to a substantive issue in that proceeding shall provide a copy of such written communication to the Clerk of the District Board The written communication shall be filed with the Clerk no later the fifth business day following its receipt by the District Board member. Written ex parse communications received by a District Board member on or after the fifth business day preceding the scheduled date of final Board action shall be filed with the Clerk no later than 24 hours after the communication is submitted to the Board member, but no later than one hour prior to the Board meeting at which the proceeding will be conducted (B) The Clerk of the District Board shall promptly provide a copy of the communication to each District Board member, place -4- the communication in the administrative record, and make the communication available to any person upon request. (3) Notice of A Significant District Proceeding- (A) Prior to the commencement of a notice period for a policy, resolution, or agreement scheduled to be considered by the District Board, the Executive Officer shall determine whether or not the Board's consideration of the matter constitutes a significant District proceeding. (B) The following language shall be included in any public notice or agenda regarding a significant District proceeding: THIS MATTER CONSTITUTES A SIGNIFICANT DISTRICT PROCEEDING WITHIN THE MEANING OF DISTRICT RULE 111. ANY SUBSTANTIVE ORM,-OR-WRITTEN EX PARTE (OFF THE RECORD) COMMUNICATION WITH A DISTRICT BOARD MEMBER REGARDING THIS MATTER MUST BE DISCLOSED TO THE CLERK OF THE BOARD IN ACCORDANCE WITH DISTRICT RULE 111. (C) The Clerk shall post a notice in a conspicuous location at the ..� District's Headquarters of the commencement of any notice period for a significant District proceeding, and shall provide a copy of such notice to each Board member. (4) I3isaFieE-��tntauttieEttions---i3o--grt�visien-of-skis--tzrk-3ha14-epplY-fB eomEnattieattons-€rom-DisH-ietsEaf€to-a-tnetnbes-of t�te�istricEBeaed: Exempt Communications- (A) Oral ex parse communications do not have to be disclosed pursuant to this rule if they are from: (i) an individual who is solely representing a small business, (ii) an individual acting solely on behalf of his or her self or immediate family,or (iii) an individual communicating to a Board member during the course of a speech,presentation, or panel discussion at a conference, convention, seminar, social event, or other meeting which is open to the general public. (B) Oral and written ex pane communications made to a Board member do not have to be disclosed pursuant to this rude if they are from: -5- (i) another District Board member, (ii) District staff: (iii) personal staff employed or retained to support the Board member in carrying out his or her duties as an official of the District oroMeFgovenamew4agene)-or (iv) officers or staff of any governmental entity or individual which appointed that Board member to the District Board pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 40420. Any ex pane communication to personal staff of a Board member, or to the officers or staff of any governmental entity or individual which appointed the Board member, for the explicit purpose of communicating to the Board member shall be subject to the requirements of this rule. (d) Violations A violation of this rule shall only occur if a person knowingly and willfully fails to file any report or communication as required by subdivision (c). -6- April 21, 1992 (PR111c) PROPOSED RULE 11L EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS WITH MEMBERS OF THE SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT BOARD (a) Purpose This rule establishes requirements for disclosure of oral and written es pane communications with members of the South Coast Air Quality Management District Board ('District Board"). (b) Definitions (1) EX PART£ COMMUNICATION means an oral or written communication from any person to a member of the District Board, other than a communication trade to a Board member during the course of- (A) a public meeting of the District Board, a District public workshop;; (B) a District Board committee meeting, or a meeting of as District advisory committee established by statute or the District Board,or (C) a meeting of any state or local agency which has been publicly noticed in compliance with the Bagley-Keene Open Meering Act (Government Code Section 11120 et seq.) or the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code Section 549SO er seq.). (2) NOTICE PERIOD means the period commencing with the issuance of any of the following public notices: (A) the 75-day notice of a public workshop for a District rule subject to Health and Safety Code Section 40440.7(a) or, if inapplicable, the 30-day notice of a hearing to consider a rule; (B) the 30 or 45-day notice, whichever is applicable, of a hearing to consider the adoption or revision of an air quality management plan; or (C) the first public notice issued, or agenda posted, relating to the District Board's consideration of a policy, resolution or agreement. The notice period shall terminate when the District Board takes final action regarding the noticed matter. (3) SIGNIFICACNT DISTRICT PROCEEDING means any proceeding before the District Board involving: (A) adoption, repeal, or amendment of a rule; (B) adoption of an air quality management plan or revision thereto; or (C) adoption or approval of a policy, resolution, or agreement which establishes legally enforceable requirements that the District Board or Executive Officer determines may have a significant impact on air quality or emission limitations, or have significant social or economic impacts. (4) SMALL BUSINESS means a business which is independenrly owned and operated and meets the following criteria, or if affiliated with another concern, the combined activities of both concerns shall meet these criteria• (A) the number of employees is 10 or less;and — (B) the total gross annual receipts are 3500,000 or less. (5) SUBSTANTIVE ISSUE means any issue other than procedural mattes such as scheduling. (c) Requirements (1) Oral Ex Pane, Communications - (A) w'a'6�"'QB@Oe•ffCF)Bd-fOF-�51gNi�+f@!}U-I-}I6[ii0t•pFB�QQ�Ie$: ee5 pewon-whe �tekrs-etr +vl>��akes-a:} morel-•er-pate oetnffiueieatiett-to��extbeE�f-tbe-District-Boar�•got�tit;g to-a-iabatast�ive-iswo-in-t�er•preoeeding-she4l--diselosa-the ae�tnsiaettenas-foHov,� Any person who makes an oral er pane communication to a member of the District Board during the notice period for a significant Durnct proceeds* which pertains to a substantive issue in that proceediryv, shall disclose that communication as follows. (i) A report of the oral er parre communication shall be — filed with the Gerk of the District Board 1n, the person who makes the oral ex pane communication to the District Board member. The report shall be filed with the Clerk no later than the Wiwi flfrh business day after the date on which the communication occurred. Reports of oral ex parte communications occurring on or after the third fifth business day preceding the scheduled date of final Board action in a significant District proceeding shall be filed with the Clerk within 24 hours after the communication occurs, but no later than one hour before the commencement of the District Board meeting at which the proceeding is scheduled to be conducted. (ii) An oral ex prate communication report shall include the following: (al) the name of the person making the ex pate communication to a District Board member and the company, organization or egency,-4-aqy; that person represents; (W) the name of the District Board member to whom the communication was made; (ells the date and time of the communication; (dM the rule, air quality management plan or revision, polity, resolution or agreement which was the subject of the communication; and (ell a eompiete-sumseery-e€-+�o-persons-o€•-t§e ooutatutacatiet�-oonee�aiag-substantiveissues•iti ik+e••-proceeding description of the substantive issues addressed by the communication and the information and posidons conveyed to the Board member. A copy of any written materials which were provided to the Board member during the oral er prae communication shall be attached to the summary. fU y'----,4n-oroJ•ac--Pare-eom>oxuticetiert-to-a•-Boa�i-++ae+rtbeP-.-- rnadekya-pe+sert-eaueg-sokly�rr ltis•r»heFbehelforor---- behal}ef-o-errtell-Htrsinassas`defave�by-➢upic+•Rule-�Bc--.. needaaor•bediselosed ptudaeaat-re•this•rrele--. (B) The Clerk of the District Board shall promptly provide a copy of the written summary to each District Board member, place the summary in the administraive record, and make the summary available to any person upon request. (C) Any oral er pane communication which occurs during the day on which the District has scheduled the s{gniflcaru District proceeding shall be orally disclosed on the record at the commencement of that proceeding by the District Board member to whom the communication was mad¢. (2) Written Fs Pane Communications - (A) Batdngi�e aetioe period-for e- tiCroastF Bistr+cFrreoeedis� Amy{+eFsotrwheauhntitsa-sw�ittetrer�re�on�eeiaetioa�e•a Ene�beF-9f-F�e--DtStFiOFBoBFd-�N/bg+•fMe-rteF+eP-pEROtf�BM1�•• signifeort•l�tstrief proceedirg-whirl.•perteieixg9•to-a•6ubstantive issue-i�-t�et-pFoeaedinB-* -P��-B-�PS`e€sueh•wr(ttae eommuaiaauotrte-tbo-aetlFo€•Fho-i>issriet-Boer--�e•writtea eom�+raieatio�-thaQetlt-ne letera•t]tiFd - r�iaes�dey-feliewaug--iss--suht�issietr•to-tka-BistFiot-$aeFd eaember,--�Vfiaten--e'-pane--0otetiet!&•sobfeitied_-t9-$ Bi6trlYt-Beard-meter-ea-or-after-�e-t§iFd-basioess-day shag be filed--w4 h-4he-C-betk-ne later-des 24 hours afteF th eommuaieation-iseebtniFtedto-the-Boerdmembers-but-na�aeeF th8il--aE6--heHF-pFieP-te-F�6--Be@tYt•-IIledEtA�--BZ-wbic�-Fhe preeeediegYAl-beaeeduoted Any District Board member who receives a written a pane communication during the notice period for a signifuant District proceeding, which pertains to a substantive issue in that proceeding, shall provide a copy of such written communication to the Clerk of the District Board. The written communication shall be filed with the Clerk no later the fifth business day following its receipt by the District Board member. Written e pane communications received by a District Board mernber on or after the fifth business day preceding the scheduled date of final _ Board action shall be filed with the Clerk no later than 24 hours after the communication is submitted to the Board membtr, but no later than one hour prior to the Boats meeting at which the proceeding will be conducted. (B) The Clerk of the District Board shall promptly provide a copy of the communication to each District Board member, place the communication in the administrative record, and make the communication available to any person upon request. (3) Notice of A Significant District Proceeding - (A) Prior to the commencement of a notice period for a policy, resolution, or agreement scheduled to be considered by the District Board, the Executive Officer shall determine whether or not the Board's consideration of the matter constitutes a significant District proceeding. (B) The following language shall be included in any public notice or agenda regarding a significant District proceeding: THIS MATTER CONSTITUTES A SIGNIFICANT DISTRICT PROCEEDING WITHIN THE MEANING OF DISTRICT RULE 111. ANY SUBSTANTIVE OR4L-0R-VMTTEN EX PARTE (OFF THE RECORD) COMMUNICATION WITH A DISTRICT BOARD MEMBER REGARDING THIS MATTER MUST BE DISCLOSED TO THE CLERK OF THE BOARD IN ACCORDANCE WITH DISTRICT RULE Ill. (C) The Clerk shall post a notice in a conspicuous location at the District's Headquarters of the commencement of any notice period for a significant District proceeding, and shall provide a copy of such notice to each Board member. (4) Di,eieFFetrtmtttrieetieRs---A'o-�revisiee-of-this•-rulo-3hal!-apply-te uon��tiioatiens-Fteat•Distriat3te�te-atcember-o€the-Btstr{ot�eard: Exempt Communications- (A) Oral ex pane communications do not have to be disclosed pursuant to this rule if they are from.• (i) at individual who is solely representing a small business; (ii) an individual acting solely on behalf of his or her self or _ immediate family;or (di) an individual communicating to a Board member during the course of a speech, presentation, or panel discussion at a conference, convention, seminar, social event, or other meeting which is open to the general public. (B) Oral and wntren ex parse communications made to a Board member do not have to be disclosed pursuant to this rule if they are from: (i) another District Board member, (ii) District staff, (iii) personal staff employed or retained to support the Board member in carry* out his or her duties as an official of the District or<otkergove+wrMentrtFageney.;or (iv) officers or staff of am governmental entity or individual which appointed that Board member to the District Board pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 40420. Any er parte cgmmunicatlon to personal staff of a Board member, or to the officers or staff of wry governmental entity or individual which appointed the Board member, for the erplieit purpose of communicating to the Board member shall be subject to the requirements of this ride. (d) Violations A violation of this rule shall only occur if a person wiUf 4 falls to file any report or communication as required by subdivision (c) knowing that the a pane communication is subject to the requirements of this rule (e) Effect of Noncompliance Noncompliance by any person with any requirement of this rule shall not by itself affect the validity of any action subsequently taken by the District Board. SUPPLEMENT TO AGENDA #30 South Coast AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 21865 E.Copley Drive, Diamond Bar,CA 91765-4182 (714)396-2000 April 27, 1992 South Coast Air Quality Management District Board Supplement To April 21, 1992, Board Letter On Proposed District Rule 111 -Ex Pane Communications With The South Coast Air Quality Management District Board At its April 24, 1992, meeting, the Governing Board's Legislative Committee received a status report on Proposed District Rule 111 -Ex Pane Communications With The South Coast Air Quality Management District Board. The Committee requested the District Counsel to draft rule language for the Board's consideration which would implement an alternative rule proposal described in the Board Letter. The alternative proposal would place the duty to disclose oral ex parre communications on Board members, rather than the public. Accordingly, the District Counsel has prepared the attached alternative to paragraph (c)(1) of the proposed rule. All other provisions of the rule would remain unchanged if the Board adopts this alternative. Sincerely, J //' a . Executive Officer Attachment PMG:TMH:exprt (exp„ dw) ALTERNATIVE DISCLOSURE PROCEDURE 'FOR .i ORAL EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS (c) Requirements (1) Oral Ek Pane Communications- (A) g, ' @ay--person-whe-makes-aFr-�:�..a-,.ekes-@Fr-erek--�-haste .eemFauaicaFieFrte�i$eatbefs€-the- #iet-BoaFd-penaiaing to-e-stthstantive-issue-3n-�§at-preeeediiig--s}ie�l-diselose4he etim�uaieati©rras-foHow� • Pa9y-$aF50Fl-Wh9-Ht@IC25-$[t-OF@�E3F-p@F;e-fOE@IniiAie@Lipi?-EO-@ FnaIn�aF-6f-i�C- dunng _h_ ^__-___ re&d-fer—a Skgi3l�f@EtE-DiSi�i(?E-pFaeaCdtiig;-�MhiE'h-pef6H 5-4o &-suhstantve issne-ts titan pFeeeeditig;sheildtselese t at•�eF Hnu-ttiemioti•as feRewse . Any oral ex parse communication concerning a substantive issue in a sign#kart District proceeding which it made to a Board member during the notice period for that proceeding shall be v disclosed as follows: (i) A report of the oral ex pane communication shall be filed with the Clerk of the District Board by the pereen Board member to whom the communication was made. The report shall be filed with the Clerk no later than the thiFd fifth business day after the date on which the communication occurred. Reports of oral ex pane communications occurring on or after the th4d fifth business day preceding the scheduled date of final Board action in a significant District proceeding shall be filed with the Clerk within 24 hours after the communication occurs, but no later than one hour before the commencement of the District Board meeting at which the proceeding is scheduled to be conducted. (ii) An oral ex pane communication report shall include the following: (al) the name of the person(s) making participating in the ex parre communication with the District Board member and the company, organization or agency—if--any; that (those) person(s) represent(s); (13I� E)te-nart�O€-Ehe-DiSt�ieE-Board-ttee[Etber-Eo�vkom the-eenHFAiraeaEtea+vas-made; (ell) the date and time of the communication; (EVY) the rule, air quality management plan or revision, policy, resolution or agreement which was the subject of the communication; and (ellMa e©tttpleEe--samtaery e£ the portions �€ eke eom�uaieatiotr-eonee�g—sebstanEive•issues-ia Elie--preeee4ieg description of the substantive issues addressed by the communication and the information and positions conveyed to the Board member. A copy of any written materials which were provided to the Board member during the oral ex pane communication shall be attached to the summary. (ieij�ln-Deal-rs paste-eommtenleetien-1o•a--Board-�embeF---- madekya-peesen-ecfirrg-soklyen-hls-oe�terbehelf-oForr---- behalf-ef-esmell-business-esrlelined-by-Dlshicf-Pule-40I needaao�be-disclosed peer3tsa+at-te-Ntlseede--- (B) The Clerk of the District Board shall promptly provide a copy of the written summary to each District Board member, place the summary in the administraive record, and make the stunmary available to any person upon request. (C) Any oral ex pane communication which occurs during the day on which the District has scheduled the significant District proceeding shall be orally disclosed on the record at the commencement of that proceeding by the District Board member to whom the communication was made. SB 1328 PAGE 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2 3 Introduced by Senators Rosenthal and Presley 4 January 28, 1992 5 6 An act to add section 40429 to the Health and Safety Code, relating to 7 air pollution. 8 9 LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST 10 11 SB 1328, as introduced, Rosenthal. South Coast Air Quality Management 12 District. 13 (1) Existing law does not require the reporting of ex parts 14 communications between members of the governing board of the South Coast 15 Air Quality Management District and parties to proceedings. 16 This bill would require the south coast district board to adopt 17 regulations by March 31, 1993, governing the disclosure of ex parts 18 communications, as defined, and to report to the Legislature by March 31, 19 1994, on the implementation of the regulations. These requirements would 20 impose a state-mandated local program. 21 (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local 22 agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. 23 Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement, 24 including the creation of a State Mandates Claims Fund to pay the costs 25 of mandates which do not exceed $1,000,000 statewide and other procedures 26 for claims whose statewide costs exceed $1,000,000. 27 This bill would provide that no reimbursement shall be made from the _ 28 State Mandates Claims Fund for costs mandated by the state pursuant to 29 this act, but would recognize that local agencies and 30 school districts may pursue any available remedies to seek reimbursement 31 for these costs. 32 Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. 33 State-mandated local program: yes. 34 35 The people of the State of California do enact as follows: 36 37 SECTION 1. Section 40429 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to 38 read: 39 40429. (a) It is the intent of the Legislature to require the south 40 coast district board to establish ex parte communication disclosure — 41 regulations to preserve the integrity and fairness of district 42 proceedings, to provide due process and fair access for all parties 43 appearing in district proceedings, and generally to protect the public 44 health and the public interest. 45 (b) For purposes of this section, "ex parte communication" means a 46 written or oral communication on any substantive issue in a significant 47 district proceeding, between a party and a board member, off the record 48 and without opportunity for all parties to participate in the 49 communication. 50 (c) On or before March 31, 1993 , the south coast district board shall DELETED MATERIAL IS IN BRACKETS [ ] . ADDED MATERIAL IS CAPITALIZED. SB 1328 PAGE 2 _________________________________________________________________ 1 adopt final regulations governing the disclosure of ex parte 2 communications. The regulations shall include, but need not be limited 3 to, all of the following: 4 (1) A requirement that, following the commencement of a significant 5 district proceeding, as defined by the south coast district board, any 6 oral or written ex parte communication between a board member and any 7 party to the proceeding concerning any substantive issue involved in the 8 proceeding shall be reported to district staff by the board member or 9 party, as provided in paragraph (6) , within three working days. 10 (2) The reporting requirement shall apply from the commencement of a 11 significant district proceeding to the date of final board action in that 12 proceeding. - 13 (3) The district staff shall promptly include any report of ex parte 14 communication in the administrative record and provide copies to all 15 board members. Upon request to district staff, parties to the proceeding 16 may obtain a copy of the report. 17 (4) Any ex parte communication received within three working days or 18 less before the scheduled date of final board action in a significant 19 district proceeding shall be reported to the district staff on the same 20 date as the communication, and shall promptly be disclosed to all board 21 members and made available to other parties in the proceeding before the 22 board opens a hearing to take final action on the matter. 23 (5) Any ex parte communication shall be reported whether the 24 communication was initiated by a party 25 or a board member. 26 (6) The south coast district board may determine in which instances _ 27 ex parte communications shall be reported by board members, and in which 28 instances the communications shall be reported by parties to the 29 proceeding. 30 (7) Reports of ex parte communications shall include, but need not be 31 limited to, all of the following: 32 (A) The name of the party making the contact and the company or 33 organization the party represents. 34 (B) The date and approximate time of each contact. 35 (C) A copy of all written documents provided by the party. 36 (D) A full summary of any oral communications involving substantive 37 issues in the proceeding. 38 SEC. 2. On or before March 31, 1994 , the governing board of the South 39 Coast Air Quality Management District shall submit to the Legislature a — 40 report describing the final regulations adopted by the board pursuant to 41 Section 40429 of the Health and Safety Code, and summarizing the 42 implementation of the regulations. 43 SEC. 3. No reimbursement shall be made from the State Mandates 44 Claims Fund pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of 45 Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code for costs mandated by the 46 state pursuant to this act. It is recognized, however, that a local 47 agency or school district may pursue any remedies to obtain reimbursement 48 available to it under Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) and any 49 other provisions of law. Notwithstanding Section 17580 of the Government 50 Code, unless otherwise specified in this act, the provisions of this act SB 1328 PAGE 3 _________________________________________________________________ �- 1 shall become operative on the same date that the act takes effect 2 pursuant to the California Constitution. e1,1,n�na�.a COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 4. 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 02708-7018 �^4'cecW4� (714)962-2411 April 29, 1992 Mr. Henry Wedaa, Chairman South Coast Air Quality Management District 21865 East Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 SUBJECT: Opposition to Proposed Rule 111 - Ex Porte Communications with Members of the SCAQMD Board Dear Chairman Wedaa: On May 1, 1992, the Governing Board of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) will consider proposed Rule 111 pertaining to ex porte communications with members of the Board. The purpose of this letter is .to convey to you, in the strongest terms, our opposition to proposed Rule 111, and to urge that the the SCAQMD Board reject the proposed Rule in its entirety. Proposed Rule 111 is the antithesis of the fundamental tenant of government in this nation, namely the free and open access to our representatives. It strikes at the basic fabric of our system. Unquestionably, this is cause enough to reject proposed Rule 111, but there are other important reasons as well . The requirement to submit written reports of oral communications with the members of the SCAQMD Board would be time consuming, costly and add substantially to bureaucratic procedures and record keeping. Certainly, this is something that we as responsible public officials should all strive to minimize. This would be a particularly unwarranted burden in these times when every level of government is financially strapped. Proposed Rule 111 is also inconsistent in its application; it covers some but excludes others. For example, an official of the County of Orange, one of the appointing governmental entities, would be exempt from filing the required report of oral communication; whereas, an official of one of the cities or the Sanitation Districts would not be exempt. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS April 29, 1992 of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA Chairman Wedaa Page 2 1w ews AVENUE P0.BU%8127 aw BBt-2tl1 \"1�"1 Finally, proposed Rule 111 puts anyone giving oral information or feedback to a SCAQMD Board Member at considerable risk should they unintentionally fail to file a required report with the Clerk of the District. Private and public officials alike encounter SCAQMD Board Members regularly at various meetings and other activities and exchange ideas. Should such an exchange take place during a casual or chance casual encounter, and should the person inadvertently fail to file a report, that person would inappropriately be deemed in violation of the rule and subject to any attendant sanctions. In conclusion, proposed Rule III would clearly suppress representative government, create a time-consuming, unnecessary, costly, bureaucratic and unfair policy, and should therefore be summarily rejected by the SCAQMD Board. Sincerely, William D. Mah ey Chairman Joint Boards of Dir ors cc: SCAQMD Board Members Sanitation Districts' Board Members WDM:dc COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS AGENDA N0, 13 0 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 1p EUIS AVENUE Pa BOX 012, EWNTAIN VALL V.MIMP AW7W4I127 OIAI%2zan April 30, 1992 REPORT OF THE CONSERVATION, RECYCLE AND REUSE COMMITTEE MEETING DATE: APRIL 30, 1992 - 5:30 PM COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Present : John C. Cox, Jr., Chairman Betty Mrgudich, General Counsel's Office Burnie Dunlap Frank Iazlo Carrey J. Nelson STAFF PRESENT: Glenn Parker J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Leslie A. Pontious Blake P. Anderson, Director of Technical Services Phil Sansone Charles G. Nichols, Conservation, Recycle, Reuse Peer Swan Manager Henry W. Wedaa Susan M. Bradford, Principal Environmental Specialist Bob Ooten, Assistant Superintendent of Operations ...i Corinne Clawson, Public Information Officer Absent: Arthur G. Newton Iry Pickler Robert Richardson Sal Sapien Grace Winchell 1) Status of Anaheim Forebay Reclamation Plant Siting The Districts' 30-year Wastewater Management Action Plan, "2020 VISION," approved by the Boards in 1989 identifies increased water reclamation as one of the major programmatic goals. Accordingly, there are numerous ongoing efforts pertaining to the expansion of the Districts water reclamation program including siting of new treatment plants. Staff provided a summary report to the Committee on the status of reclamation plant siting in the Anaheim Forebay Area. A detailed Staff Report (lavender) and handouts of the discussion outline utilized at the meeting are enclosed. Report of the Conservation, , Recycle and Reuse Committee April 30, 1992 Staff reviewed pertinent information on six specific sites in the Anaheim Forebay area as described in the attached Staff Report entitled Status of Anaheim Forebay Reclamation Plant Siting. Staff has conducted discussions on three new sites with the cities of Anaheim and Fullerton, as well as Rockwell International Corporation located in Anaheim. Three of the original sites that were previously identified, including Crescent Basin, La Palma, and the Waste Water Disposal Company (WWDC), are still being considered. Staff also described research to obtain real estate Multiple Listing Services and collaborative efforts with Orange County Flood Control for available properties. The Committee and staff discussed the importance of reclaimed water marketing and it was the consensus that the Districts should immediately consult with cities in the potential reclaimed water market service area. Staff will seek letters of commitment for use of reclaimed water when available and advise on ordinance and code changes to incorporate dual plumbing for use of reclaimed water. The proposal will be reviewed at the next Committee meeting. Recommendations: Staff reported that from a water quality and reclaimed water market standpoint, the Waste Water Disposal Company site has been identified as one of the top rated locations. However, because this site has been used for oil field waste disposal, it possibly contains some soil contamination. The Committee therefore recommends that staff be authorized to enter into an agreement with the WWDC to allow site investigations to characterize the condition of the WWDC property, provided that the Districts obtain first right of refusal for acquisition of said site, and that WWDC pay the cost of the site investigation. The Committee further recommends authorization for staff to negotiate an agreement with Dames and Moore, Inc., soil consulting experts, to perform the site investigation services pertaining to the possible existence of hazardous materials, in an amount not to exceed $35,000. The cost of said study is to be reimbursed by the WWDC. 2) 'Think Earth" Environmental Education Consortium In 1989 the Districts joined a consortium of environmentally-related agencies, companies and educators in Southern California to develop an environmental curriculum for elementary schools, kindergarten through sixth grade (K-6) as described in the attached Staff Report (green). - 2 - ' Report of the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee April 30, 1992 To date, the Districts have contributed $25,000 to develop the program and another $5,000 for distribution of the program. The consortium's distribution efforts have resulted in 1,793 (53 percent) of Southern California elementary schools receiving the kindergarten through third grade (K-3) 'Think Earth" program. Fifty-eight percent of Orange County schools have received the program Staff reviewed the program and the Committee viewed excerpts from the 'Think Earth" Grades 4-6 videos. Future development and distribution plans for the entire K-6 program over the next five years are estimated to be $375,000 shared between the 13 consortium members. The Districts share of these estimated costs would be $26,000. Recommendation: The Committee recommends that the Directors authorize a total of $26,000 to be contributed to the "Think Earth" Environmental Education Consortium as the Districts' share to complete and distribute the 'Think Earth" environmental education program over the next five years. This will increase the Districts' total participation from $30,000 to $56,000. Ref #230128.rp - 3 - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS AI ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA 10 E SAVEMIE GO WX8127 MO WNVALLEY.0 UFO MAW72"12) �✓ April 24, 1992 91.19W¢ 11 STAFF REPORT STATUS OF ANAHMM FOREBAY RECLAMATION PLANT STUNG Background The "2020 VISION' 30-Year Wastewater Management Action Plan approved by the Joint Board of Directors in 1989 included water recycling goals summarized as follows: - Construct and operate up to three new upstream water recycling plants. - Develop new water reuse markets to maximize recycling opportunities. - Continue cooperative efforts with other water agencies. - Continue to provide secondary effluent for recycling purposes. Construction of new water reclamation facilities would reduce the sewage flows to Plants No. 1 and No. 2, conserve potable water and provide a "new" source of water for u greenbelt irrigation and other uses. This report provides a status summary on site acquisition activities. Up to this time, preliminary studies on four potential reclamation plant sites have been conducted and feasibility reports prepared. The four potential sites include the Crescent Basin site, the Waste Water Disposal Company (WWDC) site, the Unocal site, and the La Palma site. Staff has previously reported to the Committee in considerable detail on these sites. The Unocal site in Fullerton was part of a proposed residential and golf course development by The Unocal Development Corporation. This site was eliminated from consideration due to environmental constraints associated with the proposed listing of the endangered species - gnatcatcher, and excessive costs. A summary criteria evaluation matrix of the other three sites is given in Table 1. The remaining original three sites and three potential new sites in the Anaheim Forebay area have been under investigation. Location of these six sites is depicted in Figure 1. A summary of Reclamation Plant Siting Activities is included in Table 2. Crescent Basin Site Approximately 10 acres in size, the Crescent Retarding Basin site is located near the intersection of the 1-5 Freeway and Brookhurst Avenue. A feasibility study update \/ Staff Report Status of Site Acquisition for an Upstream Reclamation Plant April 24, 1992 was conducted by MacDonald Stevens Engineers (MSE) in April 1991. Public acceptance was projected to be fair to poor because of the close proximity of residential housing. Wastewater in trunklines adjacent to the site was found to have an average total dissolved solids (IDS), or salt, level of 1,250 milligrams per liter (mg/L) and, therefore, additional reverse osmosis (RO) treatment may be required to produce water acceptable for landscape irrigation and other uses. The Regional Water Control Board's water quality standards are 600 mg/L. The site is a flood control retarding basin owned by the Orange County Environmental Management Agency and is still available for purchase by ' the Districts. The site also has the drawback of being located further to the west than desirable for the majority of the reclaimed water users. That translates into higher costs than desirable. For these reasons, it was determined jointly by OCWD and Districts' staff that the Crescent Basin site was not a preferred site and that further research on other sites should continue. Waste Water Disposal Company Site - The Waste Water Disposal Company (WWDC) is located on a 5.74 acre parcel in \"'J the City of Fullerton in the vicinity of State College Blvd. and Orangethorpe Avenue, a commercial/light industrial area. The site has been used for over 60 years to dispose of oil field wastes from several producers in northern Orange County. An appraisal of the property was conducted in April 1990 by the Schooler Company and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared to allow the Districts to proceed with the preparation of a purchase agreement in accordance with CEQA. Ile acquisition process for the W WDC site began in May 1990, but was terminated by the Districts in May 1991 after the company was inflexible in its demands on key issues associated with the potential purchase, most notably cleanup responsibility for potential soil contamination from the oil waste operation. Since that time, in September 1991, representatives of the WWDC approached the Districts' staff with a far softer position regarding acquisition issues and proposed reopening discussions on the property transfer. During the past several months, staff has met with the W WDC personnel and reached tentative consensus on all important issues pertaining to possible site acquisition. However, to answer important questions regarding the site's potential contamination with hazardous waste, an agreement has been drafted to allow the Districts to proceed with site investigation. 2 Staff Report Status of Site Acquisition for an Upstream Reclamation Plant April 24, 1992 Continued negotiations for the W WDC site are deemed warranted because the site is considered a preferred site due to good quality wastewater (low in TDS), potentially minimal local public opposition and reasonable proximity to the reclaimed water market Recommendations Regarding the W WDC Site The W WDC now appears to be negotiating in good faith and also appears willing to soften its previously strident position on environmental hazard liability. In order to characterize the site conditions, staff recommends that the Directors authorize staff to enter into an agreement with the W WDC to allow site investigations of the W WDC property. It is further recommended that the Directors authorize staff to negotiate an agreement with Dames and Moore, Inc., soil experts, to perform essential site investigation services pertaining to the possible existence of hazardous materials, in an amount not to exceed $35,000. The cost of soil study is to be shared equally by W WDC and the Districts. IA Palma Site The La Palma site is a 15 acre parcel located in the northern part of the City of Anaheim, east of the intersection of the 57 and 91 Freeways. The present use is a combination of strawberry fields and two oil wells. Land use in the immediate vicinity is mixed commercial and industrial. Trunkline monitoring of sewers tributary to the La Palma site showed potentially significant problems with high TDS levels, averaging over 1400 mg/L. Such high TDS levels are a significant disadvantage because the Districts would need to add more RO treatment units to meet the Regional Water Quality Control Board's (RWQCB) Basin Plan water quality objectives. The additional RO treatment would add substantially to the cost. Staff has concluded that site acquisition proceedings should be delayed until a brine and salts management study of the tributary area is completed and it can be determined if the high salts can be effectively mitigated. The brine and salts study is further described below. Other Site Research Activities With the difficulties and challenges associated with Crescent Basin, W WDC and La Palma sites, staff has expanded its research of other possible reclamation plant site opportunities. These are described below. 3 Staff Report Status of Site Acquisition for an Upstream Reclamation Plant April 24, 1992 V Anaheim Redevelopment Agency: The Districts have met with staff of the City of Anaheim Redevelopment Agency to identify reclamation plant siting opportunities as part of the Anaheim Redevelopment Plan. The meetings have been positive, the city expresses enthusiasm and support for locating a reclamation facility in the area, and the Agency staff is researching their project files for potential opportunities with the Districts. - Disney Development Corporation: Disney Corporation has expressed interest in water reclamation as part of their Anaheim theme park expansion program. Districts' staff met with Disney and City of Anaheim staff to determine the interest and needs of the City and Disney with regards to water reclamation. Staff will be able to determine the amount of recycled water needed by Disney in June or July when their preliminary Environmental Impact Report is available. A meeting will be held on April 29, 1992 with Disney on the proposed reclaimed water distribution system in the vicinity of the park, and possible siting alternatives. Discussions continue on opportunities for siting a reclamation treatment facility in Anaheim's Commercial Recreation Area around the park. Rockwell International Corporation: Districts' staff met with staff of Rockwell, Anaheim in March to determine their interest and needs for reclaimed water. Rockwell is in the process of downsizing their Anaheim facilities and may have land available for a reclamation plant. They would also have need for reclaimed water for cooling towers and other industrial processes. Staff toured the Anaheim site and found the site favorable due to its central location in an industrial area and good location with respect to reclaimed water users. Unfortunately, wastewater tributary to this site is the same as for the I Palma site with its concerns for high TDS. Rockwell facilities staff have recently toured our treatment facilities and have expressed interest in possibly selling some land to the Districts for a reclamation plant. Reclaimed Water Marketing Staff is researching redevelopment plans, general plans, and utility codes of the cities within the reclaimed water market zone. These cities include Anaheim, Fullerton, Yorba Linda, Placentia, Brea, Orange, and Santa Ana. Staff has met with personnel from the Cities of Anaheim and Fullerton to discuss potential reclamation programs as part of their redevelopment efforts and necessary changes in city codes to allow for dual plumbing systems. Staff is continuing to investigate each city's reclaimed water market needs. 4 Staff Report Status of Site Acquisition for an Upstream Reclamation Plant April 24, 1992 Brine Management Evaluations Monitoring of wastewater quality in trunklines adjacent to potential reclamation sites has been conducted for a minimum of seven days for each identified site. An objective of the monitoring program is to determine wastewater quality in order to guide design of reclamation facilities, in particular desalting technology. Identification and removal of high salt point source inputs could,be advantageous to a reclamation plant. Currently, staff is investigating salt contribution to sewage from home water softeners and local industries. A multi-phase program including field sampling is underway to investigate the contribution of salt from residential versus commercial/industrial sources. The first phase involves characterizing the land use in the area tributary to the Carbon Canyon trunkline. This trunkline could provide water to the La Palma W WDC or Rockwell sites. This work will include determining age of the trunklines, types of land use, and isolating areas that are strictly residential or commercial/industrial. After land use characterization, then sampling points will be determined. Twenty-four hour composite samples will be taken in residential as well as commercial/industrial areas for total dissolved solids, boron, and heavy metals. Sampling will commence by the end of May 1992. Results should be available in July 1992. Ref #230117.rp 5 TABLE 1 CRITERIA MATRIX FOR MOTENTIAL RECLAMATION SITES WR®M AM ONPOOILL MP OBIT ilfP u PAIAA ARP OwM 0�1 Wr+IM Iriial Mw�HIa Im1YwM.C�r< E�wy L WL/Y Yr.Ytl P YwrlwwW v M1rtlrp b WfM 0..0 Ir ti IN.evlMllll L74 11Ia��A bbbw �iA! Mw Nw.w lM M W tarty ryo]yyy L VMwr AM1�9i.q�p Iwww W/0u�. Ialw•Mtn raWA wm. 4 YIM .r1 wsl IN wIVOIOII ��r✓�� I'n M�rrl YW 11,n Haw RW r M Ar b M a..B r qor Y6 � IR.�wemlw) w ArrAmm vm vm vm von Ibn Ml ]A u IU RA I II.1 0A 31 LI LI U 0 Tom L mp�Iy1W�I I IiA VD 1311R0 EaD YW IlS 11a0 I.A 1L0 IM i.aae w!/I b/Mo) g.w.A b/bra) I w A LVCI a R1I� .'rf I'rf •IN w Im i Im b 100 i VD rlJkn��Js 1 Y 1 Y I Y I17 •R1w 14 .17 I NO yw. lw1 4NO MY UMW IAI w ).111 M MMM W a Ii ROW Im W I.III W o W OR 14w�W i® Am UII U!1 W 1W W IA1 MY to"W + ,Mr I.NI Lm I= 11>0 m U,lN m II=m M14 w Miw4w M B II it i M II R A `� NI�IIr bllA 19 a' I'✓ Y m w IN �Ii p m }.b KID i4 AV t1UR)' P Mew MAQ IyABM Milo 94/WIYA V Irlpa,RwwwYl i 0 v (111) U {1qp u IRp(N.II u m to) 1.100) RI W11(44) v+r.�~ 1'�w 111 Ism''' wBl ®PIR i�,I nl ,gym�i A) u�oepvll �AmOlwu tswwl rr-o� Ieae r+- '"r�al.a. m RawL6� Irrrwl Wti Iwmb�tl Od+rr AOR RI001 I MM ME aMw FIN For amM Ann+I. rrwr 4dW /plo Ialo MAM IL• Iu •'K .•✓ Mwo •� mlm wlm mIm bb IsilwY Irlw.rl IN IN O 410 Wl MI iM I al;abwl 3M IN !A IN m 39 MO Rwww awRlr m I. III IM IN I'I IN 1) aMbLw 4R IM Wr IF IN NO u1 ep T"(i/M Lit IAN IJHW I® I.I" At uu NAULSailalflp_tlN1L8Wm11RBaA.fIm*MILBIO➢d (F—hm I' 1001) '�tt_DhpRIRI aan' WOI.G.BIar'0^II°^ F.m®Oily Reea1 (U.&I 1001) 'f4Nc.nLBAr2tlMI�Rectaawlrw FealleRr RroM (Apl0 1001) 'La_Pa6m.Wao R"kffngU9ajv=lM• R.vall /.Iw. 11911 —BMg 'b.M00_Ilwbr_Plamld�3ll�pamdmOf / ,n we I .w. pme IM 01 AM X wi IIrR P,iA Ref 0230117.rp M� 910601 AULY 1991 6 i Staff Report Status of Site Acquisition for an Upstream Reclamation Plant April 24, 1992 TABLE 2 Summary of Reclamation Plant Siting Activities Site/Agency/Task Status Crescent Basin Staff will be meeting with Flood Control and GSA personnel to determine feasibility of site acquisition La Palma Brine management studies being conducted in local area Waste Water Due diligence agreement acceptable to the Districts and Disposal Co. W WDC. Awaiting updated cost estimate for hazardous waste site assessment Seal Beach Wastewater quality and flow data are acceptable for a reclamation plant. Drafting RFP to determine reclaimed water market in area Anaheim Met with Redevelopment staff and discussed reclamation Redevelopment opportunities in the redevelopment area. Agency Anaheim/Disney Anaheim/Disney interested in reclamation. Will meet with both parties when draft EIR is out in June/July Rockwell Interested in reclamation and potential sale of property. Continue to meet with Rockwell personnel. Unidentified Staff has contacted a broker to determine if commercial sites Site Tracking can be monitored on a consulting basis Brine Management Determining contribution of salts, heavy metals, and boron to sewer from residential and commercial/industrial areas surrounding Carbon Canyon trunkline Water Marketing Staff has determined which cities are in redevelopment or general plan revision and are contacting appropriate personnel to discuss water reclamation opportunities Project Financing Investigating financing options for various potential sites to meet specific needs. Ref#230117.rp 7 5 FIGURE 1 LOCATION OF POTENTIAL RECLAMATION SITES F UL LIE 0170N 1 9 i F YLIE s 0W - AV iMllf A CilE9GPNf R@fAfi0P10 WASTEWATER r�mry avmrr DASPI'PROPEfifY DISPOSAL omu OOWA]w - v PROPERTY PI.A1lf SAE A IN ABOE0 ■0066L P0966®014®D) amp 66 0Df040A P6 Ot 0Rm 40A p. Via. uvuw ��y SS fE A01A 0 e m 0 `ntef N230117.rp 8 l PRESENTATION OUTLINE UTILIZED AT THE APRIL 30, 1992 CONSERVATION. RECYCLE & REUSE MEETING April 30, 1992 STATUS OF ANAHEIM FOREBAY RECLAMATION PLANT SITING Crescent Basin Site Waste Water Disposal Company (WWDC) La Palma Anaheim Redevelopment Agency Disney Development Corporation Rockwell International Corporation `/ 1 April 30, 1992 CRESCENT BASIN SITE Feasibility study completed in 1991. Property owned by the Orange County Environmental Management Agency. Site is still available. 2 April 30, 1992 WASTE WATER DISPOSAL COMPANY (WWDC) Site acquisition process started in May 1990. The WWDC property was appraised and a mitigated negative declaration completed in 1991. Negotiations halted in May 1991 -- WWDC owners inflexible on key issues. September 1991 - WWDC re-opened negotiations with the Districts �./ staff- W WDC owners more flexible in negotiations. An agreement to conduct a hazardous waste site assessment has been drafted and is acceptable to the Districts staff and WWDC owners. \..� 3 Y April 30, 1992 �..� RECOMMENDATIONS WITH REGARD TO THE WASTE WATER DISPOSAL COMPANY SITE a) That staff be authorized to enter into an agreement with W WDC to allow site investigations to characterize the condition of the W WDC property. b) That staff be authorized to negotiate an agreement with Dames and Moore, soil consultants, to conduct a soil assessment at a cost not to exceed $35,000. Cost will be shared by Districts and W WDC. 4 `...� April 30, 1992 LA PALMA SITE Feasibility study completed in July, 1991. Wastewater in trunkline is high in total dissolved solids. Staff is conducting a brine management study to determine source of salts and ability to mitigate the salt impacts thereby reducing levels of RO treatment `/ 5 April 30, 1992 OTHER SITE RESEARCH ACTIVITIES Anaheim Redevelopment Agency Disney Development Corporation Rockwell International Corporation 6 April 30, IM ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Staff met with Redevelopment Agency to determine reclaimed water needs and potential sites for a reclamation plant. Personnel from Agency researching for potential sites for a reclamation plant. ..J 7 Y April 30, 1992 DISNEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Staff met with Disney and City of Anaheim to determine reclaimed water needs. Reviewed City Water Reclamation Feasibility Study - demand to supply reclaimed water for landscaping and high rise dual plumbing up to 5 mgd. Preliminary reclaimed water distribution system in vicinity of Disney/Commercial Recreation Area (CRA). Utility work by Disney may start as soon as mid-'93; Districts' commitment may be needed by that time. 8 �.,✓ April 30, 1992 ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL Rockwell has expressed interest in using reclaimed water and potentially selling land for a reclamation facility. Districts staff have toured the Rockwell site and are continuing to determine the level of interest in sale of land for a reclamation plant. Wastewater in tributary trunklines is high in total dissolved solids. `/ 9 April 30, 1992 �..� RECLAIMED WATER MARKETING Reviewing selected cities' general plans. Identifying redevelopment areas. Discussions with cities on needs/opportunities for water reclamation. 10 �..� i April 30, 1992 BRINE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Purpose: To determine the source of high salts to the sewer and determine how these salt contributions may be effectively controlled. Phase I Characterization of the area tributary to the Carbon Canyon trunkline (near La Palma and the Rockwell sites). This study is determining: commercial/industrial salt contribution to sewer residential salt contribution to sewer socio-economic profile of area age of the tnnildines review local discharge permits in area �� 11 k April 30, 1992 BRINE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Phase II Sampling sites will be selected based on information obtained in Phase I. Composite wastewater samples will be tested for total dissolved solids (TDS), boron, and heavy metals. 12 e April 30, 1992 BRINE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Phase III A brine management program will be drafted to reduce salt contributions to the sewer thus malting the wastewater quality acceptable for recycling efforts. �.J 13 April 30, 1992 POSSIBLE FINANCING APPROACHES Alternative Funding Source Debt Mechanism(sln) 1 Assessments, user fee, Assessment Bond/Certificates private monies of Participation/Industrial Development Bond 2 Assessments, special Assessment Bond/Mello Roos taxes, user fees, Bond/Certificates of assessments Participation 3 Assessments Assessment Bonds - 2 or more tiers 4 Assessments, possible Assessment Bond/State user fees Revolving Fund 5 Assessment, user fees Joint Powers Agreement Certificates of Participation P1Debt can be issued on a fixed or variable rate basis. 14 i April 30, 1992 PHASED WATER RECYCLING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Initial feasibility reports - Wastewater facility planning Water supply & demand assessment Detailed recycled water market analysis Site Acquisition Analyses `� 15 i April 30, 1992 PHASED WATER RECYCLING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN, Cont. Project alternatives and detailed feasibility evaluation of economic, technical, environmental and social factors - Generate preferred site recommendation and purchase action. Preliminary engineering and permitting Design CEQA Construction Start-up and operation 16 COUNTY SANITATION Dumas 1 21 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 1O EWa AWWE PG.BOX 8127 ADUKAINV4 Y.CCEWO 8272"127 �_J nutaB2Ran April 24, 1992 STAFF REPORT "THINK EARTH" ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION CONSORTIUM Background One of the elements of the Boards' adopted "2020 VISION" 30-year Wastewater Management Action Plan, approved by the Joint Board of Directors in 1989, is an ongoing commitment to public education. In 1989, as part of implementing the public education goals of the plan, the Districts joined a consortium of environmentally-oriented agencies, companies and educators in Southern California to develop an environmental curriculum for elementary schools, kindergarten through sixth grade (K-6). The 13 consortium members originally committed $25,000 each to finance the project The members have direct input and final approval of the content of the program. The Districts' Boards approved another $5,000 to be used for distribution of the program in Orange County. The consortium members are listed on the materials and are able to receive the finished product at cost. Members of the consortium include: ARCO, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, City of Los Angeles, Ventura Regional Sanitation District, Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, Southern California Edison Company, South Coast Air Quality Management District, County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, Southern California Gas Company, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, Educational Development Specialists and the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power. Stains Update The consortiums production and distribution efforts to date have resulted in 1,793 (53 percent) of Southern California's elementary schools receiving the kindergarten through third grade (K-3) "Think Earth" program. Fifty-eight percent of Orange County Schools have received the program (see attached distribution report by county.) We have reached 123,000 students in Orange County. Therefore, our $30,000 investment has cost about twenty-four cents per student reached to date. This cost per student will, of course, steadily decrease as the program is revised each year. Response evaluation cards sent to each school with the program indicate that 100 percent of the teachers returning the cards rated the program very positive or positive. A follow-up survey to determine actual usage found that 64 percent of teachers taught `� the program during the spring semester. Staff Report 'Think Earth" Environmental Education Consortium April 24, 1992 The only consistent concern expressed by teachers was the desire to have a program for each teacher in each grade level, as opposed to having to share the unit with other classes in each grade level. Last Year, the Joint Boards approved spending another $6,667 to provide every Orange County teacher with a "Think Earth" unit in a joint cost-sharing proposal with the six other consortium members that serve the Orange County area. However, due to the lack of support and follow-through of the other six consortium members, the proposal could not go forward. Districts' staff is therefore abandoning this idea because of the lack of interest by our Orange County partners. The 4-6 grade units have been recently field tested and have received very positive feedback. They are now being redrafted. Districts' staff has worked very closely with the developers to assure that the messages included in the curriculum are consistent with the Districts' positive and balanced environmental management viewpoint. Distribution of the 4-6 grade units is planned for the fall. There is considerable new work ahead for the entire Southern California Consortium. Future production and distribution plans for the entire K-6 program include printing the 4-6 grade units; distribution of the 4-6 grade units, distribution of additional K-3 units, completing a video for 4-6 grades, developing a Spanish translation t' of portions of the program, developing and distributing school principal guides, and �a.✓ conducting teacher workshops. The cost of these expanded plans is estimated to be $375,000 to be shared by the 13 consortium members over the next five years (see attached breakdown of projected costs.) The Districts' share of these estimated costs would be $26,000. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Directors authorize an additional $26,000 to complete and distribute the 'Think Earth" environmental education program over the next five years. This will make the total Districts' investment in this elementary school environmental education program $56,000. Ref #230118.rp 2 �f THINK EARTH ENVIROLe-NTAL EDUCATION CONSORTIUM ` f DISTRIBUTION REPORT February 20, 1992 NO.OF R E Q U E S T S %OF COUNTY PUBLIC ELEM. PUBLIC PRIVATE TOTAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS SCHOOLS SCHOOLS REQUESTS SCHOOLS 1. IMPERIAL 30 16 1 17 53% 2. KERN 122 62 4 66 51% 3. LAUSD 414 192 0 192 46% 3A LOS ANGELES 684 - 362 261 623 53% 4. ORANGE 329 190 67 257 58% 5. RIVERSIDE 165 81 13 94 49% 6. SAN BERNARDINO 247 119 19 138 48% 7. SAN DIEGO 340 171 62 233 50% 8. SAN LUIS OBISPO 40 16 1 17 40% 9. SANTA BARBARA 65 34 9 43 52% in. VENTURA 120 96 17 113 80ek TOTALS 2,5561 1,339 454 1,793 1 A total of 3,420 letlers were sent to public and private school principals,but we don't have the number of private schools by county. The total return(public and private) to date Is 1,793 out of 3,420(52.42%), plus the 38 kits send to D. Stoner for workshop. Thus, 159 of the original 1990 evallable school packs remain. EXPENSE FORECAST TO COMPLETE DEVELOPMENT AND MINIMUM DISTRIBUTION OF K-6 UNITS IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA n.941 _CY 1992 CY 1993 CY 1994 CY 1995 CY logo EXPENSE Eaer lelo E.O, "a. Fa4, fete EaOr l•Ia Eapr hl. DEVELOPMENT A floeuce 46 YWeo hnteae 6 Few...al.."latl.«ape $15.000 _ap•5v«Iw 4 i un is LM C TI•«tale K41 aW«ard i4.000 "..aalalals WI.Spaniel,I.00uca 9aphx•,Incur.N achael xa D D.SWlsh l�4-0 95.000 E. Wela and waJaa.P Para Bch.!OuWa tar..aplela K.o «Mq cM S10,wo DIBTNBWIOW- A As P*a(IW9I)SW $60.000 dabUla 1.000 K-3 School ,am 0 END 01.@ aM 02 03 sclw.l r«n a Plin110rez)Sd"I'ta1a E35.000 wo,000 1.5004 a s.h0ol pexa 0 po 1.BE 03 achW rear G R IWS3).nclds1lwt. 550,000 SS0,000 1,0$101.0ON w94.Paco O slop la w�w ale w_w .away«A a Ppq 199)51•w asabpa LOoo wo,000 150.004 c4wpae N�osdmq path @ SI00 TOTALS: $70.00 $50,00o $45o00 650,000 $50,000 $0 00 050,000 150,00o so WLENDARYEARTOTALS: IBM- 8100,000 1$98. 4105,000 I9w- S51,000 "S. 55 "o "go. 650,000 '48VIDEO: Naolo«iMSO 1.0 K 3 48M1001.K 6)WWO "Sclwol pa.xpl.«pony,mIa KJ>4.o;$1001aN 0)EaluOe materak•nd all dhr aehlapm «la.p.,alaaw.ahlpglp,pom.tloaul kpenWOMamalAnp•l..ch.de•M...eanelae.0aN0e«•M C -c.re xaeglw.rep.nv,qc.F C EXPENSE FORECAST FOR THINK EARTH CONSORTIUM 2-18-92 DISTRIBUTION EXPENSE SPONSOR SIZE CY 1992 CY 1993 CY 1994 CY 1995 CY 1996 AROD L $12,000 $10,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 Clean Water, City of Los Angeles M $8.500 $7,000 $3,500 $3,500 $3,500 EDS S $4,500 $4,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 GTE L $12,000 $10,000 $5,000 $5.000 $5,000 LADWP M $8,500 $7,000 $3,500 $3.500 $3,500 MWD of So. Califomla L $12,000 $10,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5.000 Orange Co. Sanitation Districts M $8.500 $7,000 $3,500 $3.500 $3.500 Los Angeles Co. Sanitation Districts L $12,000 $10.000 $5,000 $5,000 $5.000 So. Coast Air Quality Mgmt. District L $12,000 $10,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5.000 Southern California Edison L $12,000 $10,000 $5,000 $5.000 $5.000 Southern California Gas L $12,000 $10,000 $5,000 $5.000 $5,000 Ventura Co. APCD S $4,500 $4.000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 Ventura Co. Regional Sanitation Dist. S $4,500 $4,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2.000 TOTALS: $123,000 $103,000 $51,500 $51,500 $51,500 COUNTY,SANITATION DISTRICTS 0 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA RE: AGENDA ITEM NO . 14 IM44 ELLIS AVENUE vo BON 8121 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 �./ May 6, 1992 7141 ee2-2411 REPORT OF THE SPECIAL JOINT WORKS SELECTION COMMITTEE RE COMPUTERIZATION Meeting Date: May 6. 1992 -- 5:00 p.m. COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Present: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Thomas M. Dawes, Director of Engineering William Mahoney, Joint Chairman Edwin E. Hodges, Assistant Director of Evelyn Hart, Vice Joint Chairman Maintenance Charles Puckett, Chairman, Steve Hovey, Information Services Manager Fiscal Policy Committee Wendy Sevenandt, Staff Engineer Peer Swan, Chairman, District No. 14 Absent: OTHERS PRESENT: Buck Catlin, Past Joint Chairman Representatives of firms being interviewed 1. Consideration of Professional Services Agreement with RJN Computer Services. Inc. for Computer-Aided Support System for Maintenance Management, Specification No. S-059. On March 4, 1992, the Selection Committee gave staff the authority to negotiate a professional services agreement with RJN Computer Services, Inc. for a computerized maintenance management system in an amount not to exceed $593,025.00. The enclosed February 27, 1992 Staff Report (white) describes the system and the process followed in selecting RJN. Staff reported that it had negotiated terms of an agreement with RJN and reviewed the major provisions with the Committee. Following a discussion by the Committee, consideration of the agreement with RJN for the Computer-Aided Support System for Maintenance Management was continued to the next meeting of the Committee. 2. Computerized Facilities Record and Drawing System, Job No J-25-1. At the meeting on March 4, the Committee selected Lee & Ro/RJN Group, Inc., a Joint Venture; John Carollo Engineers/Boyle Engineering Corporation/Psomas, a Joint Venture; and James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers, Inc. as the three short-listed firms to be invited to make presentations to the Committee at the May 6 meeting on each firm's proposal for `'� the the Computerized Facilities Record and Drawing System, Job No. J-25-1. Enclosed is a staff report (pink) dated April 30, 1992 which outlines the project in more detail and includes the Scope of Work (green) and an interview rating form (tan) provided to the Committee for evaluating each firm's proposal . Each of the three firms made a formal 45-60 minute presentation (including a question and answer period) on the capabilities of their firm and how they would approach the task of computerizing the Districts' facilities records and drawings. Following the presentations and a debriefing, consideration of the proposals was continued to the next meeting of the Committee. ENG/J/25-1:SCR.5692.1 -2- �� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 4 Af ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10644 ELLIS AVENUE CO.BON.10 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92720.8127 0141962-2411 February 27, 1992 STAFF REPORT Computerized Maintenance Management System Specification No. S-059 Summary On November 22, 1991, the Special Joint Works Selection Committee held a meeting to review the project goals and consider the consultant interview process for the proposed project for a Computerized Facilities Records and Drawing System,Job No. J-25-1. during discussions, two issues were raised: (1) whether to utilize three-dimensional computer aided drafting (CAD) for the Computerized Facilities Records and Drawing System for the plant atlas; and (2) whether to combine that project with the pending project for Computerized Maintenance Management �../ System, Specification No. S-059. This staff report addresses the proposed acquisition of the Computerized Maintenance Management System and recommends that its procurement proceed independently of the Computerized Facilities Records and Drawing System. Backeround In 1983, the Districts completed construction of secondary treatment facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2 under federal and state construction grant project C-06-1073-140. The total estimated cost of this project was $31,321,000. The project included the primary effluent pump station, main air compressor building, air separation and liquid oxygen storage equipment, secondary clarifiers, return sludge pump station, plant water pump station, and tunnels at Plant No. 2. During the past several years the closeout of the project grant has been delayed pending the inspection, audit and claims resolution. Recently, all of the outstanding issues with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) pertaining to the project were resolved. The final work required relates to installation of a computerized maintenance management system. The EPA and SWRCB are requiring that a formal computer-based preventative maintenance system be developed for all plant equipment. The system is to summarize all of the preventative maintenance work recommended by equipment manufacturers and document that the work is completed. v If the deficiencies are not corrected, all associated costs will be declared unallowable, and the grant funds will be recovered by the EPA and SWRCB. Computer Automation Master Plan In June 1991, the Districts' Boards of Directors adopted a computer automation master plan which incorporates the following elements: A. Adoption of the following network configuration: Phase 1 The installation of a dual-host minicomputer system provided by Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) on an Ethernet network backbone. This system will fully support the Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) with network connections to all Laboratory facilities at both Plant I and Plant 2, together with the existing Local Area Networks for Technical Services. The hardware configuration will also provide the majority of the computing hardware needed for a Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) to be implemented in Phase 2. (This system was purchased at a cost of$567,000 and installed in August 1991.) Phase 2 The extension of the Ethernet backbone already installed in Phase 1, together with any necessary network peripheral equipment and software. This will be in support of the CMMS. This will add Operations & Maintenance local area networks (LAN) located at Plant 1 and Plant 2 to the Ethernet network. (The budgeted amount for 1991-92 is $900,000 for all hardware and software.) `.✓ B. Connect the computer systems provided for in the Plant No. 1 Control Center Instrumentation, Job No. J-23-2 and the Replacement of the Computerized Monitoring System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P244 into the Ethernet backbone. Provide a software interface to enable summary data to be transferred directly from Operations process monitoring and control computers into the Administrative network. This will eliminate costly and error-prone duplicate data entry, as well as provide more accurate and timely reporting. ($1,500,000 is budgeted through 1992-93.) C. Full implementation of the Computerized Facilities Records and Drawing System, Job No. J-25 will provide a means of accessing CAD drawings on-line showing plant facilities and structures, utility lines within the plant, "as built" drawings of plant utilities, electrical schematics, sewer trunk lines and feeders, as well as possible tie-ins to Orange County's GIS system. Additional modifications will be made to the network to make these resources available to all nodes of the Administrative network. Additional modifications will enable these resources to be fully utilized within the CMMS, as well as technical drawings, exploded views of machine parts, and such diverse features as video excerpts from sewer line investigative studies for Collection Facilities. ($2,500,000 is budgeted through 1993-94.) 2 `.. U Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) Staff has actively investigated several available CMMS packages, including those supplied by EMA, Keith-Stevens, ABC, RJN Computer Services, I.M. Montgomery, Hansen Software, CHAMPS, J.B. Systems, and S.E. Technologies. As a result of the investigation, a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) was issued to twelve firms. The RFQ requested that the suppliers submit a statement of qualifications, references, resumes of key personnel, a description of how they would propose to accomplish the work, a complete description of their software and pricing information. The suppliers were advised in the RFQ that the Districts' staff would evaluate and rank the proposals and that the top-rated proposers may be invited to meet with the Districts Selection Committee for an oral presentation. Responses were received on December 17, 1991, from six firms. Staff has reviewed the submittals and ranked them as follows (see attached summary): 1. RTN 2. J.B. Systems 3. J.M. Montgomery 4. CHAMPS S. Diagonal Data 6. Management Analysis Company u' These firms submitted a letter stating they were declining to submit proposals. In addition, as part of the evaluation staff has contacted 23 users currently using one of the `.J systems mentioned above and has used this information in their evaluation. The most essential function of any Computerized Maintenance Management system is Work Order Processing. This general categorization includes Preventive Maintenance, Corrective Maintenance, Maintenance Cost Accounting and Stockroom Inventory Management. This would apply not only to treatment plant maintenance but also maintenance of all wastewater collection facilities including manholes, sewer lines and pumping stations. The common element to all of these operations is the creation and maintenance of intricate computerized records related to specific valves, engines, electrical components, pumps and instrumentation. These records enable the Districts to maintain such equipment according to the wide variety of specifications recommended by the various manufacturers, adherence to warranties and other factors. Additionally, it allows the Districts to compare maintenance costs by model and manufacturer type, scheduling and budgeting materials and manpower for future maintenance, as well as tracking the maintenance history of a particular component throughout its useful life. At the present time, contemporaneous maintenance records are kept on various cards and forms- all paper based. However, the sheer size of the physical plant of the Districts has made the continued use of such paper-based records unmanageable. Additionally, the use of paper-based ,,,, 3 a records does not allow the cost accounting and maintenance cost comparison and other analyses that would be possible with computerized record keeping. The need to access video data obtained via the TV inspection of sewer lines, pipes, manholes and other collection facilities can be helpful, but it is not critical. In a similar fashion, the ability to display line drawings, schematics, shop drawings, facility maps and other types of graphic representations would also be helpful, but it is not critical. The capability for these functions to be performed was included in the selection criteria and the top ranked vendor has demonstrated an ability to meet this requirement. f nj&rm Computerized Systems Requirements The functionality of accessing video and graphical data hinges on three issues, two of which have been approved by the Boards as part of the Minicomputer Hardware System and Network Master Plan: 1. Communication Interface. Adherence to the IEEE 802.3 network standard, commonly referred to as "Ethernet". Ethernet is an industry-wide standard, not a vendor-specific standard. As such, the use of Ethernet should not hamper or restrict any system recommended by an engineering consultant or staff. 2. Database Management System (DBMS) Interface. A relational DBMS based upon the Structured Query Language (SQL). SQL is an industry standard with many applicable DBMS products available and not specific to a particular vendor. The CMMS system proposed by staff uses a particular product known as Oracle. This DBMS is the premier SQL-based DBMS in use today. However, the advantage of SQL-based DBMS is that any SQL-based DBMS will communicate freely with any other SQL-based DBMS. Oracle is hardware-independent and will operate on and communicate with more than 130 different hardware platforms from more than 80 different vendors -- more than any other SQL-based DBMS product in existence. This insures the greatest flexibility and breadth of choices possible for any potential system recommended by an engineering consultant or staff. 3. File Format Readability. The third issue is file format readability. The CMMS product proposed by staff for the Districts will accept the following formats: Raster: CALS CCITT Group 4 (GP4); CCITT Group 4 with a TIFF header (TIF); CCITT Group 3 2D FAX with a TIFF header (TIF); Run Length Compressed (RLC or VID); CIMAGE (DSI); Intergraph GP4 (C11) IS/ D: AutoCAD (DWG); Intergraph (DGN); ARC/INFo Other: HPGL plot files; ASCII TXT; DXF; SLF The variety of formats supported by this CMMS software is broad enough to cover all of the 4 `..� major vendors that could be reasonably considered for any potential system recommended by an engineering consultant or staff. Any format not included on this list would be so obscure as J to not be desirable for the Districts consideration due to its incompatibility with the systems in use by the other engineering firms which conduct business with the Districts. Conclusions and Recommendations The Maintenance Department has been studying the need for the proposed Computerized Maintenance Management System for several years. The staff is confident of their evaluation of the proposed system that best meets those needs. Whereas, the proposed Computerized Facilities Records and Drawing System, Job No. J-25-1 has just begun. The Scope of Work document for Job No. J-25-1 makes it clear that this project is a joint-effort study between the selected consulting firm and the Districts staff. A considerable amount of study wilt be necessary to determine the exact specifications and requirements for the District's future utilization of Computer Aided Design, Facility Mapping, Automated Mapping, Geographic Information Systems and any other categorization of graphical output deemed necessary. The technology in use in these areas is in a constant state of transition, as are the needs of the Districts. It will require this type of a project (Job No.J-25-1)to identify and match these needs with the optimal supporting technology. It is the opinion of the staff that lock-stepping the two functions together -- Job No. 1-25-1 and the acquisition of a Computerized Maintenance Management System -- would not serve a purpose. The function of accessing drawings and maps by the CMMS is a relatively minor function and not as vital as the other functions mentioned previously. Also, as noted above, the acquisition of the proposed CMMS should not overly constrain any future recommendations and would provide the optimum flexibility possible to enable future system to be accessible by the CMMS. In August 1991, staff submitted a letter to the SWRCB requesting that, because of the progress made by the Districts in the areas of Maintenance Department computerization, they reconsider their position to withhold final payment as the construction grant for the Plant No. 2 secondary treatment facilities (approximately $1.1 million). They responded in a letter to the General Manager that "Based on Districts' progress towards computerizing maintenance management at Plant No. 2 and the Districts' obvious commitment to complete the progress we (SWRCB) are recommending grant project close-out and final grant payment for all outstanding C-06-1073 grant projects." It is staff's belief that undue delay in acquiring a CMMS would result in a reversal of the SWRCB's decision. Therefore, staff recommends that the procurement of the Computerized Maintenance Management System proceed independently of the Computerized Facilities Records and Drawing System, Job No. J-25-1, and be finalized as soon as possible. 5 EVALUATION SHEET Computer Aided Support System for Maintenance Management Specification No. S-059 _ PP C R J J. S O O H J M B. Y S I A N M S S N M T I T p E B S S M L S E 5 0 5 0 5 Experience - 5 years + 10 1 9 10 5 Installations - 10 minimum 5 0 5 0 3 Q.A. Program plus copy of Q.A. Manual I 0 1 1 1 Proposed Schedule of Workshops 2 0 0 1 0 - Cost Breakdown of manhours and associated expenses for workshop 1 0 1 1 0 Standard Rate Schedule for programming modifications l 0 0 0 0 Description of custom modifications 1 1 1 0 1 Training manhours - recommended number 1 0 0 1 1 Qualification statement 5 0 5 5 3 Key personnel breakdown and resumes 5 0 5 5 0 Description of tasks 0 0 0 0 0 Software 1 0 1 1 0 - description of systems capabilities 1 1 1 0 0 - programming languages 1 0 1 0 0 - hardware requirements 1 0 1 0 0 Statement acknowledging Scope of Work I 0 0 0 0 Conflict of Interest Disclaimer 1 0 0 0 0 Errors and Omissions Insurance 24 24 24 24 22 General System Requirements 17 17 17 17 16 Reporting Requirements 44 32 44 44 0 Sewer Maintenance Management Module 14 0 14 14 0 Physical Inspection Module 36 35 36 36 36 Plant Maintenance Management Module 11 5 11 11 0 Image Management Module 1 1 1 1 1 Non-Collusion Affidavit 1 1 1 1 I Insurance Requirement Certification 191 F118T184 173 1 95 TOTAL POINTS EVALUATION SHEET Computerized Maintenance Management System Specification No. S-059 03/04/92 C R J J.S H J M B.Y A N M S M T DESCRIPTION P E S M S $277,040 $97 ,924 $120,000 -Professional Services 29,000 16,900 5,000 Direct Cost N/A 96,600 N/A Sub-consultant Fees 45,000 31,714 N/A Fixed Profit $800/day 351,040 243,138 125,000 Subtotal, Professional Services Including Training 70,595 40,000 -Sewer Maintenance Management �..J Module 48,595 18,000 -Physical Inspection Module 92,595 30,000 79,500 -Plant Maintenance Module 35,200 25,000 -Image Management Module N/A 95,6001" 9,675n' -Annual Licensing Costs 166,000a) Extra Costs $689,9000' $598,025 $617,738 $214,175t4' 1 TOTAL CONTRACT '0 This is a recurring Annual Licensing fee. n' Bid states "total records conversion could be accomplished for an additional $166,000." o' Considered non-responsive because costs exclude software and are for professional services only. Total represents the average number of days to accomplish the same task for RJN, JMM and JB Systems x SHOO/day. (4) Considered non-responsive because costs exclude software and professional services to complete the tasks in the Collection System. 1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS r 21 ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFOPNIA April 30, 1992 108.ELUB AVENUE 00.Box 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 82728"8127 P141862£411 STAFF REPORT Computerized Facilities Records and Drawings System Job No. J-25-1 Consultant Interviews SUMMARY On April 10, 1991, the Boards of Directors authorized the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate a professional services agreement for Job No. J-25, Utility and Facility Atlas and Power System Studies. Subsequently, this project was separated into two jobs: Job No. J-25-1: Computerized Facilities Records and Drawings Systems Job No. J-25-2: Power Studies for Plants 1 and 2. On November 13, 1991, the Boards of Directors authorized the Special Selection Committee to solicit proposals from three qualified firms for Computerized Facilities' Records and Drawing System, Job No. J-25-1, and to interview the firms and negotiate a Professional Services Agreement for the project for consideration by the Boards at a future meeting. These interviews are scheduled for May 6, 1992, as follows: PROPOSING FIRMS TIME INTERVIEW LOCATION LEE & RO/RJN GROUP, INC 5:30-6:15 p.m. Board Room (A Joint Venture) JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS/ 6:20-7:05 p.m. Conference Room "C" BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION PSOMAS (A Joint Venture) JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, 7:10-7:55 p.m. Conference Room "A" CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. The original staff evaluation of the Statements of Qualifications is summarized for the three firms and is included as Attachment "A". BACKGROUND On November 22, 1991, the Special Joint Works Selection Committee held a meeting to review the project goals and consultant interview process. From the interviews, the most qualified firm will be selected by the Committee for negotiation of a professional services agreement. In addition to negotiating the fee, the scope of work will be finalized thereby allowing the benefit of that firm's expertise in developing the final scope of the project. �../ 1 This staff report reviews the project goals and provides a guideline for evaluating the consultants during the interviews. The scope of work is attached for reference. PROJECT GOALS The goal of the Computerized Facilities' Records and Drawing System is to provide a means to keep track of the physical installations for the collection system, the treatment facilities and interconnecting utilities. The system is envisioned to include computer systems to process and store the information which would be linked with the existing networks; standards for uniform drawings; maps of the collection and treatment facilities; a relational database for accumulation of information; a data management system; process and instrumentation diagrams; loop diagrams; and a hydraulic modeling program for the collection system. At the March 4th meeting, the Committee considered and rejected the ideas of combining Job No. J-25-1 with the Computerized Maintenance Management System, Specification No. S-059; and making Job No. J-25-1 a three dimensional system. The project will provide a means to maintain records and information which support design, construction, operation, and maintenance functions. Some applications of the system would be: o Keeping track of underground utilities o Checking existing installations during the design or rehabilitation of facilities o Training of maintenance and operations staff o Locating equipment in the field o Investigating field routing of piping o Generating maps as requested by staff o Flow modeling to determine impacts of growth on the collection system o Maintaining annexation information o Generating plan and profile views of the collection system piping o Providing reference material for all departments. With the ongoing expansion and modification of Districts' facilities, the ability to readily access process information is critical . Information gathered from construction drawings, shop drawings, "as built" inspection files, operations, maintenance, and investigation of actual plant installations would be combined through this project to verify and generate a complete set of master drawings of the treatment processes and auxiliary systems. CONSULTANT EVALUATION GUIDELINES The attached rating chart lists fourteen elements which could be used by the Committee as a guideline for the evaluations. The Consultant's presentation should demonstrate the ability to accomplish the tasks described in the scope of work. A key element to the success of the computerized system is the creation of the relational database and the ease of access to the information from the 2 graphics screen. Three dimensional (3D) applications will not be applied to the initial system, but the potential to expand to 3D capabilities is desired. Cost estimates are not required at this point; yet, a space is allotted for evaluation of cost should the issue be discussed. This project has a recommended allowance of $3,000,000 in the proposed budget, spread over three years, including $1,000,000 for fiscal year 1992-93. The presentations should leave the members of the Special Selection Committee with a sense of confidence as to the abilities of each firm or team to accomplish the project. u 3 ATTACHMENT "A• STAFF EVALUATION OF THE STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS The evaluation of the three proposing teams is summarized here based upon the evaluations originally made prior to the selection of the successful consultants who would continue in the selection process. The successful consultants are: 1) Boyle Engineering Corporation/John Carollo Engineers/Psomas and Associates (B/JCE/P) 2) James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. (JMM) 3) RJN Computer Services/Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers (RJN/LR) The Statement of Qualifications submitted by the above firms and teams were reviewed and evaluated by CSDOC staff. Below a table has been developed to compare the capabilities of the firms as demonstrated through the Statement of Qualifications. The firms' qualifications were rated on the seven items listed below on a scale of 1-5. A score of 5 represents the best capabilities as compared to the other SOQ's. Then a weight factor (1-10) was applied to each item to stress its relative importance. 1. Demonstration of similar project experience through graphic examples, project descriptions and sample documents. This pertains to both treatment facility and collection system applications. (Weight factor = 10) 2. Demonstration of extensive use of a relational database while in the graphics mode to access information. (Weight factor - 10) 3. Experience of company in wastewater treatment and sewer collection system planning and design. (Weight factor = 8) 4. Location of company. (Weight factor - 6) 5. Approach to computer systems implementation. (Weight factor = 4) 6. Overall staff confidence that the project will be successfully implemented to meet the Districts needs. (Weight factor = 2) 7. Experience with CSDOC. (Weight factor = 6) 1 S%.01 '° /Fvm B/JCE/P JMM RJN/LR �..i PROJECT EXP. 40 50 50 DATABASE EXP. 50 50 50 POTW EXP. 40 40 32 LOCATION 30 30 18 APPROACH 20 20 20 STAFF CONFID. 8 10 8 CSDOC EXP. 30 18 24 TOTAL 218 218 202 Comments on evaluation: B/JCE/P - The Boyle/Carollo Engineering Team demonstrated an extensive amount of experience both in wastewater treatment and collection systems planning and design. Many District projects have been performed by these firms. Boyle has the computer background and experience required to meet the needs of this project. Subsequent to the submittal of the Statement of Qualifications, Psomas withdrew from the Psomas/HDR team and joined the Boyle/Carollo team. Psomas brings sound computer capabilities in Geographic Information Systems to this joint venture. JMM - Montgomery demonstrated extensive experience in all areas related to this project. Additionally, JMM provided sample documentation which shows their ability to successfully provide the documentation necessary to maintain the system after implementation. JMM has been providing assistance in obtaining the Orange County base maps for use in this project. They have used these maps for County of Orange projects. RJN/LR - RJN possesses extensive experience in computer data management and mapping systems. Both RJN and LR have the wastewater treatment experience adequate for the project, and but three other submitting firms have more related experience. Lee & Ro has been involved in Districts projects for many years. Project management may be hindered by geographic location since the computer group is located in Illinois. RJN has been awarded the Computerized Maintenance Management System project, and has opened a local office. a.i -2 RATING CHART SCALE = 1-10 (10 BEING HIGH) ..r Boyle/JCE JMM RJN/Lee & Ro Understanding of Scope of Work Demonstration applicable to this project Computer system will be compatible with Districts guidelines Demonstrated database link while in graphics screen Demonstrated applications for Standards development Demonstrated applications for Data Management Demonstrated skill in database development Demonstrated skill in Facility Mapping Demonstrated skill in Collection System Modeling Demonstation of potential link to Computerized Maintenance Management System System demonstration proceeded smoothly 3D CAD application capabilities Cost estimates overall confidence that Consultant will accomplish tasks desired COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 'y 21 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10 EWS AVENUE November 14, 1991 no.WX E127 EUUWAIN VR V.GUMAXIA 82J l27 SCOPE OF WORK Computerized Facilities Record and Drawing System Job No. J-25-1 I. SUMMARY Conduct a needs assessment and prepare specifications for acquisition of computer work stations and software to develop and maintain facility drawings of Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2; produce a complete computer generated set of plant process and utility drawings; and establish a computer system for facilities layout, land use mapping and hydraulic modeling of the Districts' collection system. II. BACKGROUND To meet the Districts' growing wastewater load requirements and to comply with stringent federal and state environmental regulations, new facilities have been constructed and existing facilities have been modified through many construction contracts. Facilities have also been modified by the Districts' staff. Record drawings of the construction projects are kept on file. Although these drawings adequately document the facilities constructed, they do not describe the treatment process as a complete system comprised of the individual process units, utilities, system interfaces, instrumentation, and electrical network, nor are they cross referenced. Due to the layered construction of most treatment processes, information for the process systems must be located through many construction projects. Minor in-house modifications, including those made in an emergency, are not documented. With the continual expansion and modification of the District facilities, the ability to access process information readily is critical . Combining the information from project drawings, information gathered from Districts' staff, and investigation of actual plant installations to generate a complete set of master drawings would be invaluable for design, operations, maintenance and training functions. An evaluation of the Trunk Sewer Conveyance System resulted from the 1989 Master Plan project. Land use areas were determined and flows projected. The data was entered, in spreadsheet format, to a hydraulic model to simulate flow through the trunk system and pump stations. The results of the model lead to the recommendations for future expansion as described in the Master Plan. The land use mapping information and hydraulic modeling data are available for establishing a computerized system to be used by Districts' staff in locating information on the trunk sewers and projecting flows and system expansions. III. PRE-DESIGN MEETING Prior to beginning work, a meeting with Districts' staff shall be held to establish appropriate contacts and review the Consultant's plan to implement this work. IV. WORK ELEMENTS The Consultant shall provide engineering services to conduct an assessment to determine the computer system best suited for the needs of the Districts, prepare specifications for the acquisition of the computer hardware and software, prepare plans for the layout of the system at the Districts offices, produce CAD drawing standards, establish a database, develop data management procedures, provide training, and complete two tasks for the production of plant and collection system drawings. The first task will be to initiate a plan and work with the District staff to develop a computer generated master set of facility drawings of -- Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley, Treatment Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach and all interconnecting utilities. Facility and utility is mapping shall be completed to show all plant processes, utilities, and structures as they are actually installed. Process and instrumentation diagrams and loop diagrams shall be produced. The second task will be to implement a facilities mapping, land use mapping and hydraulic modeling computer system portraying the Districts service area of Orange County with the Districts' trunk sewer system superimposed upon the base map of the service area. This system will be used by the Districts to generate a layered computer map which will classify the land use, show the collection system, maintain information pertinent to the collection system, and model the collection system for planning purposes. A. GENERAL The Consultant shall provide a recommendation for a computer aided drafting and information system to manage the Districts' records and drawings. Plans and specifications for the system shall be developed; a database shall be constructed; standards for all drawings shall be produced; a data management document shall be generated; and training shall be provided as detailed below. 2 1. COMPUTER SYSTEM FOR DISTRICT OFFICES a. Needs Assessment The Consultant shall conduct a needs assessment to determine the computer system which would best suit the Districts planned applications. The results shall be documented and a recommendation shall be made that is substantiated by the assessment. In addition to the Districts' planned applications, consideration shall be given, as a minimum, to the existing and planned equipment and computer systems at CSDOC, systems used by Orange County and the cities served by the Districts, systems used by other Consultants and Contractors who have projects with the Districts, availability of personnel qualified to use the system, and cost of system implementation and operation. The Information Services Division has developed a guideline for acquiring computer equipment which was approved by the Board of Directors. This guideline shall be considered in the system selection process. Deviations in system selection not consistent with this guideline must be justified in the needs assessment document. Compatibility or system integration with the planned Computer Aided Support System for Maintenance Management shall be considered and addressed. Other information which the Consultant perceives to be important in the selection shall be included in \/ the evaluation. This system must be able to handle the data, studies, and programs and drawings assembled by Tasks 1 and II of this project and the Power System Studies, Job No. J-25-2. This computer system will be used to incorporate changes to the master files including new plans, "as builts", maintenance changes, and associated data. The system shall be set up for planning, design, construction, operation, and maintenance applications. The investigation and report shall address links to the existing networks, system configuration and software programs necessary including drafting program, database, modeling program, file manager, and a text editor. A report shall be generated that documents all aspects of the needs assessment as outlined above and as determined pertinent to the selection of the Computerized Facilities Records and Drawings System. Five copies of this report shall be submitted to the Districts for review and comment. Ten final copies of the document incorporating any comments shall be submitted to the Districts. �� 3 b. Plans and Specifications The Consultant shall prepare Plans and Specifications required to procure and install a complete and functional computer system to handle the information and tasks developed by this scope of work. The Plans and Specifications shall be prepared to the Districts' standards for public bid. Five copies of the Plans and Specifications shall be submitted to the Districts for review and comment at the 50% and 90% complete points. Typically, a four week time period should be allocated for the Districts' review of each submittal . All comments shall be incorporated into the final Plans and Specifications. Reproducible plates of the final Plans and Specifications shall be delivered to the Districts. Printing of the document will be performed by the Districts at Districts' expense. The specifications shall describe the computer system and associated software which will be required by the Districts' staff to access and maintain the drawings and database information and perform the collection system modeling. The Consultant shall identify the hardware requirements in the specifications for the complete system including remote computer stations and links to existing computers and networks. Plotting hardware shall be specified which provides plotting `..� capabilities at the Plant No. 1 Engineering area, Operations and Maintenance areas at both plants, and at the Construction Management trailers of both plants. The printer at the Planning and Design area shall be an electrostatic type printer capable of printing 400 dots per inch (dpi) at a minimum rate of 1/2 inch per second. A required feature is the capability to print copies of the master files at remote printers. Plans for the layout of the computer system, all work stations and printers at the Districts' offices shall be prepared. The Plans shall show any link to the existing backbone network. The Consultant shall work with the Districts staff to determine which personnel shall have work stations at their desks and where stations shall be set up for general use. In the Engineering area, stations will be used by the staff responsible for revisions to the master files. Remote stations shall be used by various departments for data and drawing access. 2. STANDARDS The Consultant shall work with the Districts staff to develop CAD standards for the drawings prior to the execution of the drawing generation tasks. The standards shall establish the basic ' 4 guidelines for the drawings. The basic guidelines for the drawings shall address drawing format definition, standard drawing symbols, layer convention, text styles and sizes, line weights, arrowhead styles and sizes, piping and equipment identification abbreviations, color assignments, plotting standards, drawing file identification, number of drawings per file, and title blocks. The Consultant shall work with the Districts to identify other elements which require standardization. A book of CAD standards shall be produced which documents all the standards which will be used to generate the CAD drawings. The book shall be divided into two parts - one for the plants and interconnecting utilities system and the second for the collection system. This book will become the CAD standard for future design projects. During the development of the standards, example sheets for drawings shall be created which illustrates the general appearance of the drawings, standard symbols and abbreviations. Three copies of the draft standards book along with the sample drawings shall be submitted to the Districts for review and comment prior to the continuation of the project. Comments made by the Districts shall be incorporated into the final standards. Reproducible plates of the final standards shall be delivered to the Districts. Printing of the document will be performed by the Districts at Districts expense. 3. DATABASE DEVELOPMENT The development of the database is a critical portion of the project for both the Utility and Facility Atlas and the Collection System mapping. The capabilities of a relational database used with a CAD system is not fully realized by the Districts. The Consultants task here is to investigate the Districts use of information by various departments (i.e. Engineering, Construction, Maintenance, Operations, Technical Services), consolidate the information, and present the results in a format which would show staff the extent of the database and how the information would be manipulated. The Consultant shall work with the Districts' to determine the information to be included in the initial database. Factors which will influence the decisions will include necessity and cost. Provisions for expansion of the database shall be included. A database will also be developed for the Maintenance Management project referred to above. Integration of the two databases shall be considered. 4. DATA MANAGEMENT The Consultant shall prepare a "Data Management System" document to manage the files created from both tasks. This document shall `� ' 5 contain the guidelines for a data management system which will protect the files, control revisions to master files, and gather l i information generated by the various groups an changes and new work. This data management system must be able to track on the drawings planned design projects, proposed changes, "as built" revisions to the drawings and changes made through operations and maintenance. Software used to manage the files shall be specified and included in the specifications. Forms to facilitate the data management procedures shall be developed. The data management system shall address the use of the database with the CAD program and modeling program. Report formats shall be developed for inclusion in the data management system. The Consultant shall work with the Districts to develop reports which can supply information required of the various departments. The Data Management System document shall include sample reports and instructions to generate the reports. Integration with other District systems shall be addressed, such as the Maintenance Management system. The document shall estimate the staffing requirements to effectively utilize the system and identify their responsibilities. The intention is to have a minimum number of CAD drafters responsible for making updates. These drafters should be responsible for making copies of the master files onto floppy disks and printing hard copies for requesting personnel . Three copies of the draft document shall be submitted to the Districts for review and comment. All comments shall be incorporated into the final "Data Management System" document. Reproducible plates of the final document shall be delivered to the Districts. Printing of the document will be performed by the Districts at Districts' expense. 5. TRAINING The Consultant shall develop a training program and provide training. The training program shall identify personnel to receive training and present a schedule to accomplish the training. The Consultant shall work with Districts' staff to develop a program which meets with Districts approval . The CAD training shall commence at the start of the project and continue through the data entry phase. The intention is to have the Districts personnel familiar with the programs so that they can work with the CAD drafters during the data entry phase of creating the drawings and database. These Districts personnel shall be able to use the system in a fully functional capacity at the time the project is completed and turned over to the Districts. 6 When the drawings are completed, the Consultant shall also provide overview training for 25-30 of the Districts supervisory personnel . This training shall introduce the system, show what information is accessible, teach the personnel how to access the programs and maneuver through the drawings and access database information. A separate training session shall be conducted for the collection system engineering supervisors on how to use the modeling program. 6. EXISTING CONSTRUCTION AND SHOP DRAWINGS Existing drawings and databases are available for viewing to assess the amount of effort necessary to complete this scope of work. Field verification of information is required. Existing computer files and databases will be provided to the selected firm. B. TASK I PLANTS AND INTERCONNECTING UTILITIES The Consultant shall initiate the task to generate the original master set of CAD drawings which will consist of the facility and utility maps, process and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs), and loop diagrams for Reclamation Plant No. 1, Treatment Plant No. 2 and interconnecting utilities. The first step will be to develop a base map for each plant. Upon acceptance of the base maps, the Consultant shall proceed with the generation of a utility map for the Headworks No. 2 area at Plant No. 1. The Consultant shall also produce the P&IDs and loop diagrams for this area. Five copies of these drawings along with copies of the files shall be submitted for review and comment before proceeding with the entire set of drawings. - The Consultant shall work with the Districts to determine the drawing conversion technique which would economically accomplish the conversion of the remaining plant information to CAD format. The method of choice is not stated here due to rapid progress and improvements in this field. The Consultant shall involve Districts personnel (to an extent acceptable to . the Districts) during the drawing and database production to allow the Districts personnel to become familiar with the system. Temporary work stations shall be provided by the Consultant as deemed necessary to carry out the drawing and database production and training effort. At a minimum, the drawings shall have the information described below: 1. FACILITY AND UTILITY MAP A complete set of drawings shall be produced on the CAD system for Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. gas well as all \� 7 interconnecting utilities which shall depict each plant as a group of processes which are interrelated to make a complete system. These drawings shall show the plants in plan view, with all tanks, basins, buildings, diversion structures, roadways, equipment, piping, valves, gates, stop logs, weirs, other piping appurtenances, manholes, underground pull boxes, power distribution panels, power distribution transformers, motor control centers, branch circuit panels, motors greater than 1 horsepower, free standing control panels, computer work stations, duct banks, telephone and data networks, fiber optics, conduits, cable raceways, and the point of electric service (with meter number) shown. The drawings shall use the Districts established plant coordinate and grid system. A base map for each plant shall be developed in a layered method to show the plant perimeter, river and other surrounding features, roadways, tunnels, duct banks, tanks, trees, and a footprint of basins, buildings and other structures. All existing facilities and facilities under construction shall be included and identified. Tunnels, duct banks and roadways shall also be identified. Topographic features and the superimposition of areal photographs with the facility maps shall be included if the assessment phase recommends a system with these .capabilities. All utilities shall be depicted in a layered method as developed , in the standards for this project with the option to select specific utilities for viewing and printing. Sectional views at areas of intensive piping and cross sections of various areas in tunnels and at tunnel intersections shall be produced. These sections shall be accessible from the graphics screen through menu driven commands. Cross-sections shall identify the elevation of the utilities, pipe service and size, conduits and cable trays. Cross-section drawings shall be created in sufficient quantity such that there is no section in the tunnels which does not have a representative cross-section drawing. References between the plan view and the cross-sections are required. Categories of pipe service shall be as identified in the 1991 Edition of the Standard Specifications. References from one printed sheet to another shall be indicated where process streams interface. All coordinates which are field verified shall be indicated as such. Piping information which shall be shown on the drawings include line size, material of construction, process flow direction, and the process material being conveyed. This information can be in a code form developed in the standards. 8 Identification of conduit size and contents of the duct banks shall be included. Capabilities shall be provided to allow the generation of a conduit schedule. Information shall be contained in a database which identifies construction projects by Districts' job numbers and makes reference to shop drawings. Through computer commands, the information shall appear in the respective areas on the drawing or printed in a report format. 2. PROCESS AND INSTRUMENTATION DIAGRAMS Process and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs) shall be made which represent all tanks, basins, equipment, pipe lines, instruments, and instrument signal lines and interlocks. These diagrams should be generated in accordance with the standards developed above. The base P&IDs should have tanks, basins, equipment and major process pipe lines identified. Tanks and basins shall be identified by name with the volume, average retention time, maximum hydraulic flow capacity, weir elevation, and maximum temperature and pressure indicated, as pertinent. The line size, material of construction, process flow direction, and the process material being conveyed shall be identified for all piping. Lines discharging to the atmosphere shall be indicated as such. All valves, gates, weirs, stop logs, and other piping appurtenances shall be shown. Piping codes and abbreviations are acceptable, but must be defined. Pipe schedule abbreviations shall conform with the 1991 Edition of the Standard Specifications, Section 39-0130. Categories of pipe service shall be as identified in the Standard Specifications, Section 39-0140. All major process flow lines and auxiliary utilities shall be shown. Major process flow lines include raw sewage influent, screenings, grit, primary influent, primary effluent, primary sludge, scum, secondary influent, secondary effluent, waste activated sludge, thickened waste activated sludge, return activated sludge, and digested sludge. Each auxiliary utility shall have a process flow sheet dedicated to that utility. All storage areas shall be identified with the flow from each area represented. The flow representation shall have branched lines to show all destinations of the utility. The sheet numbers and equipment, basins or tanks to which the utility flows shall be identified. These utilities include plant water, industrial water, potable water, high pressure air, instrument air, chlorine, ferric chloride, ferrous chloride, law pressure digester gas, high pressure digester gas, natural gas, steam, hot water, chilled water, high pressure air, low pressure air, foul air, caustic, acid, and polymer. w On the printed sheets, references at the line match points shall be made. The references to be indicated are the continuation sheet number and equipment, tank or basin where the line terminates. Instrumentation shall be identified in accordance with the Districts standard symbols. All instruments should have District assigned tagnames which shall be used. Instrument tagnames not previously assigned will be provided by the Districts. A lead sheet shall be provided identifying each symbol , code and abbreviation used on the P&IDs. Through menu driven commands in the P&ID graphic screen, the associated loop diagram for an instrument shall be accessible. 3. INSTRUMENT LOOP DIAGRAMS Instrument loop diagrams shall be generated using CAD in conjunction with a database for all instrument loops. This includes both field and control room control loops, as well as both analog/discrete recording, indicating, and alarming loops. In general , loop drawings will be associated with one unique instrument loop. When instrument loops are cascaded, a separate (cross-referenced) loop drawing should be created for each individual loop. Instrument tagnames will be provided by the : District in conformance with the "CSDOC Instrument Tagnaming System". ` I, All electrical connections associated with the loop should be �✓ depicted on the drawing, including all junction box, control panel , and terminal strip connections, as well as power supply source (with disconnects) for electronic controls. A database in spreadsheet form (LOTUS) currently exists which contains information on existing instruments and is used to assign tagnames to new instruments during the design phase of a project. This spreadsheet data shall be entered into a database system which can be linked with the CAD program. C. TASK II COLLECTION SYSTEM A computer aided facilities management and modeling system shall be established at the District offices to allow data access, data control , facilities mapping and collection system planning by District personnel . The computer system shall consist of a central relational database linked with the CAD system for mapping and a hydraulic modeling program for the sewer system. The base map for the system shall be provided by the Districts. This map will be obtained from the Orange County Environmental Management Association Surveyors Department. If necessary, the Consultant shall 10 provide conversion of this base map to the format necessary for the system selected during the needs assessment. The facility map shall show: The entire Districts service area District boundaries Drainage basin boundaries Composite land use map showing planning zones City, County, and State roads and highway right-of-ways The complete collection system including pump stations, pipes, diversion structures, manholes and nodes Facilities numbering system for easy reference Land parcels in the unincorporated area of District 7 System software with the capability of measuring land areas to eliminate hand planimetering methods shall be provided. The software shall automatically store area data to appropriate spaces in the relational database. Modeling software shall give Districts' personnel the ability to determine sewage flow projections, determine the normal and optimal routing of sewage flows, and assess impacts of expansion and growth. Through the facility map and relational database, the system shall have the capability for data storage and manipulation and report generation. At a minimum, the information shall consist of: Facilities reference number (Station R, ID N or other identification) Sewer reference names Construction contract number and date Location and limits of sewer lines Pipe elevation, size, material of construction, coating or liner, roughness Record slope of pipe Flow monitoring data (design d/D ratio, velocity, flowrate) Type and size of manholes Surface elevation and diameter of manhole ring and cover Surface elevation of surrounding land or street Invert elevation of pipe entering manhole Invert elevation of pipe leaving manhole Distance between manholes Pump station locations Pumping equipment data Force Main length and size Modeled D/d ratio, velocity, and capacity Excess capacity District 7 (unincorporated area) track number, connection Permit nos., dates, and addresses Industrial dischargers to corresponding manholes or nodes '� 11 Additional data determined valuable shall be added into the system. The database software will automatically import all data generated by the sewer model and provide for report generation. The Consultant shall work with the Districts personnel to develop report formats. The goal of this project is to not duplicate the information included in the proposed maintenance management system, but to link the projects together to make all maintenance information accessible and perform modeling and data retrieval while in the graphics screen. The Consultant shall investigate and provide the software and documentation which will accomplish this task. The Consultant shall gather, review, and integrate the existing record data provided by the Districts and data from the 1989 Master Plan gravity system computer model. The results of the 1989 Master Plan modeling effort will be reproduced via this integrated CAD/facilities management/modeling system. Hardcopy gravity system maps at 1"=4000' scale and hardcopy color coded land use mapping at 1"=4000' will be available at the Districts Office. Hardcopy tabulations of model system input data and output reports and model schematics will be available at the Districts' office. Note that existing system model data includes only those manhole nodes necessary to account for points of inflow to the CSDOC system, diversions, and changes in pipe size or slope. The Consultant will provide a manual which clearly explains the procedures used to operate the system. The manual should describe the software used and the inter-relationships between the software. The manual shall be assembled in three ring indexed binders. Five copies of the manual shall be submitted for review and comment. Ten copies of the manual with all comments incorporated shall be submitted. V. MEETINGS Project status meetings shall be held a minimum of once a month between the Districts' and the Consultant's project managers. Additional meetings shall be held as necessary. All meeting must be documented by the Consultant with a concurrence of that documentation by the Districts' project manager. VI. MONTHLY REPORTS Monthly progress reports shall be submitted for review and must include as a minimum: 1) current activities, 2) future activities, 3) potential out- of-scope items, 4) concerns and passible delays, 5) percentage of completion, and 6) budget status. VII. QUALITY ASSURANCE (OA) The Consultant shall administer a program of QA procedures for producing quality work. Specific procedures shall cover, but not be limited to, 12 •✓ h planning, coordination, checking, reviewing, and scheduling the work. '"✓ All documents prepared by the Consultant shall be subject to the Consultant's in-house procedures prior to submittal to the Districts for review. Each submittal shall be accompanied by awritten statement from the principal-in-charge of the project which states that the documents have been reviewed and indicates who has checked the documents being submitted. Substitution of managers by the Consultant will require the approval of the Districts. The project is subject to cancellation if this approval is not obtained by the Districts. The Consultant must provide a statement acknowledging that no kickbacks, fees or remuneration of any type may be received from any manufacturer or supplier for which a recommendation is make on the project. If, in fact, the project costs (computer system procurement and installation) when bid exceed the budgeted amount by 10%, the Consultant will provide services and recommendations to reduce that amount at no additional cost. In submitting a proposal , the Consultant must acknowledge that the proposal is based on a comprehensive and complete review of the request for proposal including this scope of work which is an attachment to the request for proposal . VIII. SUPPORT SERVICES The Consultant shall provide support services throughout the procurement and installation phase for the computer system. Support services shall include submittal reviews, assistance in information requests and change order requests, system check-out and acceptance. For a period of one year following the completion of the above tasks, the Consultant shall be available to assist Districts personnel regarding any software and hardware problems or difficulties related to this project. IX. SCHEDULE The tentative schedule for this project is as follows: o Approval of Professional Services Agreement: DAY 1 o Completion of needs assessment: DAY 1 + 4 MONTHS o Completion of plans and specifications: DAY 1 + 6 MONTHS o Completion of CAD Standards and Data Management Documents: DAY 1 + 12 MONTHS o Completion of database and Headworks 2 area map: DAY 1 + 18 MONTHS o Completion of drawings on CAD: DAY 1 + 30 MONTHS 13 I 1 II o Establishment of collection system computer map and model : (AY 1 + -. 30 MONTHS The Consultant shall develop a graphic schedule to display th �oposed schedule above with milestones identified. STAFF ASSISTANCE The Districts' staff member assigned to work with the Consult; on the project is Wendy Sevenandt, (714) 962-2411. FILE:WS\J25\scope.3 + 14 af' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS P AI ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA F.O.BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN MILEY,CALIFORNIA 82728-8127 10BAA ELLIB AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 9210BJ018 01418A0-2810 0141882-2411 RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS MAY 13, 1992 - 7:30 P.M. >; I FUND NO 9199 JT MIST 4C FNIAG CAf 1101 PROCESSING DATE 4/01/92 FACE 1 p OONIT NUMBER AP43 CCUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID W4/Ofl/92 POSTING GATE 04/08 /92 - - - -- WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 121113 A 8 G IhOVSTPtrS 52.119.31 INSTRUMENT PARTS 121274 AUD KLNT-TAVLOR INC 9395.91 OFFICE SQUIPMENT 121175 AS TECH COMPANY $72.068.04 RESIDUALS REMOVAL 14.0:10-9-91 121376 ASS ANALYSIS 31.000.00 ENGINE OIL ANALYSIS 121117 APEPICAA 1ELEFhCAE 8 TELEGRAFF $1.425.71 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 121178 AGGRENO. INC 38.709.22 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES - ... 121179 AIR COLD SUPPLY INC 527.09 AIR CONDITIONER PARTS n 1211PO AIR PHC7C SERVICES 1344.81 AERIAL PHOTOS m 121161 AIR PPCCLCTS 9 CHEMICAL IN 333.630.00 OAN AGREEMENT GET GEN SYST.-M.O.8-9.99- FFI 121182 ALHAP'BRR FOURORY CC LID 33110.76 PLUMBING SUPPLIES O 121183 ALLIED ELECTRONICS $131.90 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES L 121184 RUDCQ INC t/OR AMERICAN STALE 5926.65 MECHANICAL PARTS -- - 122185 AREA SOC FCA QUALITY CONTPCL SIT5.50 PUBLICATION 1211E6 A S 1 P $97.11 PUBLICATION m 121187 PLANE P ANDERSCh - $101.73 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 3 121188 ANIYTER - DISTRIBUTION 5172.21 COMMUNICATION PARTS 121189 ANTHCAY.S P.ECH 6 PACHINE, INC. 5252.50 MACHINE REPAIRS ZIA, 121190 A-PLUS SISTERS - $5.356.60 NOTICES 6 ADS - LC7 121151 ABATER SERVICES INC $3.460.13 UNIFORM RENTALS 12121193 ART VCR KS ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC COST '566.04 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 1 .295.77 DRAFTING SUPPLIES n 121194 ASSOC. CCPINIS. L COhSOLTANIS $1.457.07 MEDICAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATORS t- 122195 AVAPCS L TRCPPIES $38.68 PLAQUES t- 121196 PAW SAFETY 8 SUPPLY 51.221.36 SAFETY SUPPLIES p 121197 BANTER OIAGNCSTICS IAC 56.151.P9 LAB SUPPLIES 121158 PAYLESS STATICAE6S $130.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES CA 221299 BEACCh BAY ENTERPRISES IhC. S1.050.00 CAR MASH TICKETS 121200 BELL SECURITY 31.815.47 SECURITY SUPPLIES 121201 SLUE M ELECTRIC CC $3,718.00 LAB EQUIPMENT C1 121202 BCLSA RAETATCP SERVICE $60.34 - RADIATOR REPAIRS .. . . -4 121203 BONA-PLIES $168.88 TRUCK PARTS N 121204 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP $2.431.81 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-16 121205 BRCVh 8 CALEVELL CONSLLTING $95.524.37 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-19 121206 STEVE PLEPLC CChS7RUCT1Oh CO $799.483.00 CONSTRUCTION 2-26-3, 2-28 121247 PUILDER•S EMPORIUM 5227.26 HARDWARE 121209 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE $133.47 - PUBLICATION -. 121269 DUPRE ENGINEERING CO 3153.90 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 2212IG UU9M PAC ASSOCIATES LAC 12.216.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-12-91 121211 BUSINESS LAWS INC $52.50 PUBLICATION . . .._... _ 121212 GARY G STRECO $404.75 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 121213 CFM CCPPOPATION $360.52 LAB SUPPLIES 121214 C P I $1,313.43 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 121215 SUP0/7 SCLLTIChS. INC $456.44 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 121216 CAL-GLASS FOP RESEARCH INC. $568.09 SAFETY SUPPLIES 121217 CALTROL INC 5741.40 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 121218 FALTFCPNIA AUTOMATIC GATE. $419.35 SERVICE AGREEMENT ri i ]a FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/01192 PAGE 2 N REFORT NURSER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION IAT4N DISTRICTS ISTPICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIVE FAIC 64/18/92 POSiIN6 DATE 04/O819 2 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 121239 CAL/S CAMERAS, INC. $593.70 FILM/CAMSRAS 121220 CAFLEIOK ENGINEEPS S7QT7.5O ENGINEERING SERVICES M.0.5-9-90 121221 JUHN CAPOLLO ENGINEERS 1137,532.63 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-36,P2-42,P1-20 121222 CENTURY SAFETY INST 0 SURF 54,058.71 SAFETY SUPPLIES 122223 CHEVRON LSA INC SII,302.OR OIL 6 GREASE 121224 CCAST FIFE EQUIPMENT 3593.70 BERVICE AGREEMENT - 121225 CCAST INSURANCE AGENCY $77,816.00 EARTHQUAKE INSURANCE H.0.3-11-92 121226 COLE-PAPMER INSTRUMENT CO $171.70 LAS SUPPLIES n 121227 COLIC" AAD SONS $489.429.60 CONSTRUCTION I-9 m 121228 CCPPLSA, INC. $1,318d5 COMPUTER HARDWURE/SOFTWARS Z 121229 CORNELL EF FARIS / DIV $154.53 TRUCE PARTS p 121230 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL - DIST 58.019.9E ELECTRIC PARTS a 121231 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC 22,630.63 TOOLS 121232 CDNTINENTAL GRAPHICS 5239.74 PRINTING 121233 CENIRGLCO S1.083.14 ELECTRIC PARTSEll _ 121234 COUNTY YPCIESALE ELECTRIC 32,506.94 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 3 121235 CAOSbY G OVERTON INC. 539,157.02 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES M.0.2-19-92 121236 UNIV OF CALIF REGENTS $3,154.92 WATER FUISEM STATE UNSMPLOYMINSTITUTE INSURANCE LC) 222237 STATE IF CALIFCRNIA $15.950.51 121232 STATE DCARC CF EOlAL12PT1CK 530.37 HAZARDOUS WASTE TAX 1 121239 C.W.P.C.A• - 3294.3E PUBLICATION .- 121240 GAMES 4 MOORE 931.865.75 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-38-3, P2-43-2 121241 CAPPER TIFE 31,004.66 TIRES r 121242 PETER C CAVED CO 370,314.34 CONSTRUCTION 344-2 121243 DEVELCPPEA7 DIFEKSIORS IKTL. $3.990.7% TRAINING VIDEOS/WORKBOOKS CO 121244 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL 31,835.25 CHEMICALS N 121245 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $109.91 PRINTING 121246 D1C1101- EGUIPPERT CCRP 59.861.39 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 30 121247 015CC PRIRT COP'PABV $385.37 OFFICE SUPPLIES 121248 DOLLINGER CORP 31.716.66 MECHANICAL PARTS .._ f7 121249 DORADO EKIERPRISES INC 333.568.08 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS N PAINT SUPPLIES 121250 DUNK ECVIMDS CCPF $635.21 121251 DVRO-SEASE CORE $956.73 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 121252 DIVALS SALES 437.A3 FITTINGS 121253 ERA SERVICES INC 53.636.2b BRGINSERING SERVICES 3-23-2, P2-44 121254 tASTPAN IKC 3866.34 OFFICE SUPPLIES -. 121255 EOENFARC LQUIPMENT $131.56 TRUCK PARTS 12125E ECOANALYSIS INC 54,549.20 CONSULTING SERVICES 121257 ASP SERVICE COPPANY 53,773.15 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES . . _.... 121258 EKCHARTER INC 34.4I0.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.7-17-91 1212`-9 ERVIPCNPEA7AL RESCUPCE ASSCC 91.082.50 LAB SERVICES 121266 EURCPA 6FEELS $432.22 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 121262 EVCELLENCE IN TRAINING. 3213.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 221262 JOHN N FALKENSTEIN PE 53.740.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9, P1-33 1212E3 FARR SALES 8 SERVICE 3122.5E FILTER - 221264 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP $659.75 AIR FREIGHT n FUND NC 9199 - Jl DIST 6EPRIRG CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE //01/12 PAGE 3 W REPORT NUMBER AP/1 CCUKTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 01/0 e/92 POSTING DATE 0//06/92 - -- WARRANT NC. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 121265 FEFRELLGAS $25.52 PROPANE 121266 FISCHER A PORTER CO 32r151.63 CHLORINATION PARTS 121267 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO $1.512.39 LAB SUPPLIES 121268 FLC-SYSIEPS $5.239.22 PUMP PARTS 171269 CITY OF FCUNTAIN VALLEY $1,986.06 WATER USE 121270 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT f151.72 PAINT SUPPLIES 121271 FIX IRDUS7PIAL SALES f598.37 TOOLS a 121272 THE FOXRCRO [0 f192.90 INSTRUMENT PARTS m 121273 6ST. INC. f2r110.11 PAINT SUPPLIES _ .. III 321271 GERBY PRCSS $85.00 PUBLICATION Z 221275 GENERAL IELEFHCNE CC $361.71 TELEPHONE SERVICES p 121276 GIf HLICM-PIICVELL INC $9.876.79 MECHANICAL PARTS a PUBLICATIONS 121276 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES INC f752.00 --1 12127E GRAHAM f PACIFIC 33 r251.97 TRUCK SERVICES - MONTRO88 CLAIM Ell 121219 GREAT PACIFIC ASSOCIATES Cf. ,345.09 TRUCE PARTS . . 3 121281 GDChRU GREEN INVE s ASSOC IA Tf.S f1.315.00 REFUND US SERVICES OVERPAYMENT M.0.6-12-91 NT 321282 6RDtlE 1A STBCNT S3.463.77 7999 REFUND USER FE8 OVBRPAYMBNT 121282 NATCP N MIRK INC $2. 70.00 - RNGINB PARTS _. 121283 HAUL AWAY CON TAIRCR$ 21,121.65 CONTAINER ESNTAL9 1 121285 RC FHORVAN ANDICRSSO ISCC f$3,000.00 LAB SUPPLIES 121285 HOUSE HORVATM 6 ASSOC. far 000.59 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, J-17 a 1212A6 HOVSE OF BATTERIES 990.00 ENGINEERS r 1212R7 GCPO CN V HOYT f990.00 SAFETY SERVICES M.0.9-12-90 r 121289 PS PUGPES CC INC 3336.72 BICYCL SUPPLIES p 221290 HUNTINNDUS VALLEY SCHVINN C 338.12 BICYCLE PARTS N 121291 I.C. PAN. INC CORP. fL$628.71 SODIUM SUPPLIES ITS � 121252 ILIA PANT INC .713.71 FERRIC SUPPLIES .._ __.... A 121293 INDIAIAL VEST CHEMICAL D S30.$75.27 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-19-90 121793 INDUSN SPRINGS TMFGHREADED CO INC f05.27 FITTINGS C7 121255 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $672.07 CONNMTTER198 - . 221255 INIIPSTA I[ PAIIIPY SYSILFS DISTRICT 3612.00 WATER 12125E IPVINE RANCH WATER DISTP i[T 315.00 METER USE 121291 JLAGREAT CREDIT CCRF S/35.32 MICROFICPE READER LEASE GRE 12129E AT CATERING SANITARY SUPP sL 985.22 JARITORIAL SUPPLIES 121300 JAY-S LAAFRING $980.22 INSTRUMENT PARTING 8YP8N88 121300 JFPSER IRS SUPPLIES [D 313171.65 INSTRUMENT PARTS 122302 JCMASIO ISUPPLY ,739.10 LAB ILICEQUIPMENT SUPPLIES 121303 JU UAN• INCN $Sr$51.91 LAB EQUIPMENT 121303 X U Y $92.03 BUILDING MATERIALS TS 12I309 XALLEEN.S COMPUTER PRODUCTS f92.01 INSTRUMENT PARTS 121305 EN AN 3LFPLY f569.9/ PIPE TH 12130E THE KEITH COMPANIES S504.0(- ENGINEERING LIESSERVICES 5-35 121308 KING REARING INC $661.36 HAMINE SUPPLIES 12130E NfNI.9 HALLXAPN CENTfP 3672.3E SUPPLI88 1213 RAATIN N SP $22. CONSTRUCTION PS RVICB9 I-9 121510 1.A.5, CC INC I1CANPLfP1 SERVE 32,212.40 MECHANICAL REPAIRS x a a FUND AC 9199 - Ji LIST L(FRIAG CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/G1/92 PAGE q REPORT HUNKER AP93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS ` CLAIMS PAID 04/08/92 POSTING GATE 09IO0/92 WARRANT NO. VIACOM AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 121311 L a C TIRE SLPVICE $47.59 TRUCK PARTS 121332 LFGI-TECH 3525.OU COMPUTER SERVICES 121313 LIVITCNOLE CCRP $1.161.50 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 121319 NP LINDSTROM INC 52.600.d2 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.10-10-90 121315 FPS $13.96 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 121316 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS INC a21323.53 MACHINE REPAIRS .. . 121317 MARNCLE ADJUSTING $4.950.00 MANHOLE ADJUSTING 221318 MARINE E VANE SUFPIY $86.44 VALVES a 121319 MAPVAC ELECTRONICS a64.UG INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES n' 121320 MATRICFS CONSULTANTS INC $107.21 PUBLICATION fT DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 1213'el MIRE MCCIpTMY 56.000.00 Cl 121d22 YC6ARRY CENTRAL TYFEVRITEP 1 $6.99 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT a 121323 Ml ASUREPERT VARIABLES $1,966.08 INSTRUMENT PARTS _ 121324 MECHANICAL SEAL REPAIR $156.15 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 121325 MICACAGE COMPUTER - S1.799.95 COMPUTER SOFTWARE Fll 121327 MILVAY YF6 6 MACHINING f64243.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 3 121328 MINNESOTA CS 5$99.13 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 12132E MITCHELLA INSTRUMENT VISUAL PPES. f96.00 INSTRUMENT ENPPLIES .. _._ � INSTRVMBNT SUPPLIES 121329 P17C"It INSTRUMENT CO f797.00 7213331 JAMESEII PACIFIC CONSTRUCiCPS $85$233.09 CONSTRUCTIENGINEERING 7-12-2 SERVICES I 121331 - DAMES M PONi80YE PY - - a233.09 BNGINBBRING 88RVICEB M.0.6-13 e90 .. 121332 MONTGOMERY . LABORATORIES $4.580.00 LAB SERVICES ]a 121333 MCPGAN CRANE CC INC S1.651.20 TRUCK PARTS r 121334 NATICRAL PLANT SERVICES INC $3.700.00 VACUUM TRUER SERVICES .. LAB 86RVICE9 122335 NATICNAL TECPNICAL INFCRMATI $53.50 d 121336 NEAL SUPPLY CO $719.55 OIL 121337 NORC AL CENT ACLS INC - $011.91 MECHANICAL PARTS ._-. -1 121338 ACRTKERK iELECCM f1.7R0.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION PO 121339 NLTECP CCFFCRP71CN $1,987.77 LAB SUPPLIES 121340 01 CORPORATION f3.660.00 SERVICE AGREEMENTS C'T OFFICE SUPPLIES 1213g2 OFFICE SC&.PAVILION/INTERIOR pE5 f662.O1 (�j2 321313 PETTY OLSCN• PHO 5969.50 WATER RESEMCH M.O.1 INSTITUTE PROJECT 121393 OR STS TOPS CC a18$550.00 CHLORINE M.O.10ICES 121349 ORACLE CORPORATION a550.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - INPO. SHAV. 121D95 ORANGE VALVE a FITTING CO. $1,256.55 FITTINGS 121346 ONITEX CCRP $9,564.52 MECHANICAL PARTS _ _... 121347 OSCAR-S LCCR a SAFE 155.00 SECURITY SERVICES 121348 OXYGEN SERVICE $1.214.37 SPECIALTY GASES 121349 ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD S104.239.85 CONDEMNATION - ELLIOTT OIL WELLS - 121350 COUNTY SANITATICN DISTRICT $2.164.39 REIMBURSE WORRSAS COMP INSURANCE 121351 PC MAGAZINE 561.97 SUBSCRIPTICN 121352 PSI - - - a135.78-- - - TRUCK PARTS 121353 YSUC(POUL SUPPLY OF OCJ $151.66 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES 121354 PSSI 1779.40 T.V. SEWER 121355 PACIFIC FLFLISHERS f67.50 PUBLICATION 121356 FACO PUFFS $76.11 PUMP PARTS ri TI .r FORD NO 9199 JT DIRT Y[RNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0/01/42 PaGF 5 REPORT NUMBER AP93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY PA CLAIMS PAID 09/08/92 POSTING DATE 09/06/92 WARRANT NC. VERCOP AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 1213EI PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO $2.575.61 SAFETY SUPPLIES 121358 PACIFIC BELL 3628.63 TELEPHONE SRRVICHS 121359 PACIFIC CFCORATING CENTERS $49.86 BUILDING MATERIALS 123360 PAC7EL FERICIAR SYSTEMS 56.896.00 TELEPHONE MODIFICATIONS 121361 PAM 6ES7 $411.61 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 121362 PAPAGON CABLE 536.78 CABLE SERVICES 121363 PATTEN CORP/ TAYLOR INSTR $127.59 CHART PAPER a 12136E PAVL-PUKRCE $655.36 TRUCE PARTS Gb 121365 PIMA GAG SYSTEMS INC 198.171.10 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 - . ._. .. Z 121366 PIONEER BANK $84.313.89 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 5-34-3 1213E7 POL1'METRICS. INC. 3341.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT Oa 12136R PCLYFLRE INC 317.545.60 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-87 .. .._.. 122369 PCNTCh IRCUS7RIES INC 31.119.38 INSTRUMENT PARTS '--' 121370 POSTMASTER $405.04 P.O. BOX RENTAL m 121371 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICL f92.00 ICE . .. ._.. 122372 PRCFESSIC6AL SERVICE IND. f1.173.Rd SOIL TESTING M.0.7-17-91 121373 THE PRO.ECT SOLUTIONS CO. 94.425.YU INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91 121374 PUTIMEISTER INC 51.355.51 PUMP PARTS Lo 121375 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO.. INC $194.94 LAB SUPPLIES 1 12137E RU SYSTEPS INC 3166.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 121377 RECYC INC $50.816.40 RESIDUAL$ REMOVAL H.O.3-13-91 .._ n 121378 RED LINE AND $260.00 STREET SWEEPING C— 121379 REOI EMPRESS 928.35 FREIGHT r 121310 THE REPLELIC RLFFLY CC $5,507.62 PLUMBING SUPPLIES - ty 12138E RICH COLCR LAB $161.63 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES N 221382 ROSEMOUNT INC. $420.80 INSTRUMENT PARTS 121393 ROYCE INSTRUPENT - '- $86.61 - INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 121384 RYAh-HERCC 12.941.59 _ MECHANICAL PARTS 122385 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP 380.75 PARTS CLEANER C­) - 121386 CITY PF SANTA ANA 3950.3E - CONTRACT SERVICES _._-- 121387 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS f959.20 PLUMING PARTS 121398 DCUG SARVIS $1.050.00 CPR/FIRST AID/DEFENSIVE DRIVER TRAINING 121389 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS IhT-L 512.206.65 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-12-91 .- _ .. 121390 SEA COAST DESIGNS $531.61 OFFICE MACHINE 121391 SCPPENTIM CCh VEYCP CORP $4,232.93 MECHANICAL PARTS 121352 SHAPRCCM SLFFLY f965.60 TOOLS 121394 S"LRWOOU NE DUCAL CO f908.37 LAB NG PLIES INSURANCE 12139q RUTH SHOVPDS 4179.U4 REFUND INSVRANCB PRBMIVMS 121395 SHUPELUCK SALES 9421.33 TOOLS 121396 SIGMA GEFICAL CO $86.01 LAB SUPPLIES 121397 SIGNS ETC. $3.593.01 SIGNS 121398 SILVER. A LE BOUEF -- - -- - ---- 5758.821.28" CONSTRUCTION 5730-3 121 SIPARF YOLK-Try MEDICAL CLI f2.628.00 PRE EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL BEAMS 121400 000 SLIDE PESTER 324.60 SOIL TESTING AIDS 122402 SMITH-ERE RY EI 5$37.00 SOIL TESTING WARE 7-17-91 121902 SOFTWARE EY SEIDFAN $1i.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE a Ln ri FUND NO 9199 Jl GIST If ANIKF VF1TAl REPG DATE 9/91/92 PAGE 6 CT REPORT OPT NUMBER AP93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/08192 POSTING DALE 09/00/92 "-- WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 121403 SOUTH COAST WATER $81.50 WATER USE 12190E SC CALIF CCASTAL LATER S4.690.00 OCRAN MONITORING M.O.6-14-89 12140` SCLTPEAK CALIF EDISCh CC $27,481.66 POWER 121406 SOUTHERN COUNTIES CIL CO 92.206.56 DISSIL/UNLEADED FUEL 121407 SOUVENIR PHOTO $7.35 PHOTO SERVICES 12340E STAMEN 2 SFASSCFF PE 57.140.O0 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.O.3-12T92 121409 SFFCIAL PLASTIC SYSTEPS INC $161.54 PLUMBING SUPPLIES ' ]a 121410 SPEC TECH INC 5375.49 WELDING SUPPLIES m 121411 SP.ECO FLEXIBLE 1579.59 TRUCK PARTS ITT 221412 STAR TOOL A SUPPLY CO 1501.03 TOOLE Z 121433 STATEWICE INSTALLERS $1.000.04 MOVING SERVICES - LAB 3a 121414 STERLING ART $9.61 ART SUPPLI68 .. _.... __..._ 121415 SUMMIT STEEL $1.939.70 METAL 121416 SUPELCO INC $352.71 LAB SUPPLIES f�Tl 121417 9UTER CHIP CORP - $945.56 CHEMICALS .._._ g 121418 SUPER ICE CCRF $81.76 ICE 121419 TALICO. INC $109.35 LAB SUPPLIES :Ph 121420 TALIN TIRE INC $297.39 TIRES ____ .... tE0 121421 TAUBER ELECTRONICS $98.97 BATTERIES 121422 TATLCR-CLhh PFG CCPFANY $2.100.51 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 121423 TECHNICAL PNCDUCTS S ETHER - $2.394.33 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES _- n 12192E TELE•CELL. INC 1639.9E CELLULAR TRLEPNONE/BATTERY PACK r 121425 TPA/hORCAL $150.00 LAB SERVICES 121426 TPCPFSOK INCCSTRIAL SUPPLY $1.552.37 REPAIR MATERIALS t1 121427 TOLEDO SCALE CORP. 9790.50 SCALE REPAIRS 12192E TONY.S LOCK E SAFE SERVICE 1196.0E KEYS N CONTRACT GROUNDBKISPING H.O,11-11791 ..... .� 121429 TOYD LANDSCAPING CO /3.819L37 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES A I21030 WESTRCNICS $1.009.37 121431 IRANSPIITER SPECIALISTS 9337.56 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 121432 TRAVEL TRAVEL $1.416.55 TRAVEL SERVICES M.0.6-12-91 N 121433 TRUCK A AL'TC SCFFLY INC 51.821.63 TAME INSTRUMENTS PARTS 121434 JG TUCKER A SIN INC $406.76 INS SUPPLIES 221435 ULTRA SCIEK7IFIC S3U7.00 LAB 121436 UNION BANK 59.533.10 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 7-11-2 121437 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $279.12 PARCEL SERVICES 12193E URITEC STATES ELEVAIOP CORP 1769.5U ELEVATOR PARTS 121439 UNIVERSAL MARINE INDUSTRIES 1822.05 LAB SUPPLIES 121490 VG/FISIONS INSTRUMINTS 121.375.71 LAB EQUIPMENT 221441 VWR SCIENTIFIC 51.587.43 LAB SUPPLIES 121442 VALIN CCPPORATICN $49.52 REGULATOR PARTS 121443 VALLEY L17/E5 SUPPLY CO $3.375.58 -PLUMBING SUPPLIES 121444 VALLEY DETROIT PICSEL $130.73 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES _ 12I995 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $591.00 LAB BUPPLI69 121446 VFPNCN PAVING COPFANY $1.570.40 WANNOLE COVERS 121997 VILLAGE AURSEP.IES $28.05 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 121448 WARREN GCPHAP A LAMONT INC $109.48 PUBLICATION Cn 1 FUAD AC 9199 - JT LIST 6CPKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/01/92 PAGE 7 V REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/08/92 POSTING DATE 04/06/92 - --- WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 121449 WEATHER AND VINO INSTRUMENT 9290.13 SAFETY SUPPLIES 1214EC WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $25.638.71 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-8-90 1214E1 VESCC S1.141.69 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 121452 WHESSCE VAREC 945.49 MECHANICAL PARTS 121453 ROURME 6 WOODRUFF S93.577.69 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.10-10-90 121454 VOODWAPO GOVEPNCP CO $1.189.45 INSTRUMENTATION 121455 NERUN CCPF $9.422.29 COPIER LEADER a 1214E6 RIChARC ICLAG FACE) 52.347.4P PRINTING SUPPLIES (A ----------------- m Z TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 04/138/92 S3.739.800.69 t7 SUMMARY AUNT _ . . .. m 3 NI OPER FUND $435.00 02 OPER FUND $2,062.70 # 82 CAP PAC FUND $799,933.84 - 03 OPER FUND $14,599.53 I 03 CAP FAC FUND $72,335.30 ]a 45 OPER FUND - $1,058.45 - r 65 CAP PAC FUND $847,419.50 r 06 OPER FUND $23.87 R7 OPER FUND $3,225.01 - - t7 47 CAP FAC FUND $167,400.41 014 CAP FAC FUND $1,780.75 0566 OPEN FUND . . . . _ __ $2,475.58 0566 CAP FAC FUND {21r777.10 06R7 OPEN FUND $2,933.48 C7 _ p7614 OPER FUND - - $395.60 'i JT OPEN FUND $669,955.61 y MAP $911,960.60 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS - $65,432.36 . _... JP WORKING CAPITAL {154,771.40 _______________ ..._... $3,739,980.89 n _ v C77 FUND NO 9199 JT GIST VCRNIhG CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/16/92 FACE I 1 F, REPORT NUMBER 4P 43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ` CLAIMS PAID O4/22/92 POSTING DATE 04/E2/9E - ------- --'_ --' -- ------- WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 321477 ACIA, INLAND EPPIRE CHAPTER $480.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 121478 AS TECH CnMPANY S87.564.86 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 121479 ASR ANALYSIS $280.00 AIL ANALYSIS 1214ED ACCU•LABS RESEARCH INC 450.00 LAB BNCINB SERVICES 121481 PCi1CK [[(R REPAIR CORP $241.9E BUILDING REPAIRS 121482 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES - -- - - - - $338.28 - - LAB SUPPLIES _ - 121483 ADVANCED COOLING TECHNOLOGIES 2131.56 ELECTRIC PARTS 121484 ADVANCO CCNSTRUCTORS INC 51.598.900.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-34-3, P1-35-2 ]a 121425 AIR COLD SLPPLY INC $32.26 - -"' — - --' CD 121486 AIR CONDIIIONING SPECIALTIES $140.08 AIR CONDITIONING SUPPLIES ' " Z 121487 AMERICAN CABLING $ CORM 5134.69- ELECTRIC PARTS CABLE tG 121488 AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY 599.9E ION - - -�- 121489 APEPICAK FLEET FARTS $254.29 PUBLICATION 1214SO AMERICAN HI-LIFT $5,556.69 HARDWARE LIFT E RUC L 121491 ROPCO INC $/OR AMERICAN SEALS $3,093.60 T TRUCK 121492 ANERSHAN CORP S410.00 LAB SUPPLIES 3 121493 CITY OF ANAHEIM 5940.00 MANHOLE REPAIRS 121494 ARDRE6+5 .CLASS CC - __._ __.. $3.603.28 .- _.. - - - LAB EQUIPMENT LC> 121495 A-PLUS S1'STEPS $6.497.17 ADVERTISING 121496 ABC LABORATORIES $2.632.50 SERVICE AGREEMENTS 1 - 121497 ARATEN SERVICES INC - $2,622.41 121458 ARENS INEUSTRIES INC $1,624.60 UNIFORM RENTALS r INSTRUMENT IES 121499 ARI2CAA INSTRUMENT 5232.47 INSTRUMENT PARTS F- 121500 ARK TECHNOLOGIES -- -- - - - $4,009.00 - - -- '- -- -- --' USER FEE PROGRAMING" -- ' --" -�- - _-- --- 121501 ASSOCIATE[ CCNCPETE PROD 1 $862.00 BUILDING MATERIALS t= 121502 ASSOCIATE[ LABORATORIES $1,100.00 LAB BVPPLIES N 121503 DENTAL INELPARCE CONSUL?. -- - - - - - $12.00-- - - DENTAL 11191fith= CONSULTING-----'--'" 121504 BC ANALYTICAL $5,462.00 LAB SERVICES 121505 BC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC $61.42 TRUCK REPAIRS ("l - 121506 BFP TRANSPORT CYNAPICS CORP $3.000.00 -- REFUND USER FEE 0VERPATN9NT-------"""' "- 121567 BR6 SAFETY A SLPFLY $546.29 SAFETY SUPPLIES 123508 BANANA ELLEPRIKT $7.116.42 BLUEPRINTING M.0.10-10-90 121509 R BATEMAN $600.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 121510 BAMTER DIAGNOSTICS INC 524.399.91 LAB SUPPLIES 121511 VT RILLAPE INC 5270.56 TRUCK PARTS 12151E 810-RAO LABORATORIES - $721.76 - LAB SUPPLIES 121513 BLUE M ELECTRIC CO 5146.07 LAB EQUIPMENT 121514 BOFHRINGER MANNHEIM 1334.4E LAB SUPPLIES 321515 BCYLE EhCIh EERINE COPP $30.609.19 - - ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 90-201 ----" 222516 BRENKER-FIEOLER 5 ASSOC IN $513.97 COMPRESSOR PARTS 121517 BRINDEASCh CCRP 5149.846.71 CONSTRUCTION J-19-2 121518 PRINDERSON CORP - _ - - -- $9.745.35-- --- CONSTRUCTION M-037 ----- -- 123519 BRISTOL BABCOCK $1.331.05 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 121520 PRCVN 5 CALCVELL CONSULTING $51.362.89 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-37 123521 BUILDER'S EMPORIUM $72.51 HARDWARE/LUMBER - "' -" -- -----'--- 121522 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES INC $1.104.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-12-91 lb N FUND NC 9199 JT DIST 6CAKIRG CAPI7AL PROCESSING DATE 4/16/12 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/22I92 POSTING DATE 04/22/92 - -- ---— WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 121523 GARY G STREED $5.302.24 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 121524 C M 1 s66.5o ELECTRIC PARTS 121526 CS CCMPIRY $377.20 VALVES 121527 CALTACL INS TU[ $5.968.43 HARDWARE 121528 CA CALIFORNIA OF TECHNOLOGY 38$167.00 BIOASSAY RESEARCH 12152E CANNON-VIA JOURNAL INC S167.00 REFUND USSR OVERPAYMENT 121`_30 CANNON-YACHON-CANNON S165.31 TEFUNO USER FEB OVERPAYMENT m 121531 CASE PC6FP t EGUIPMERI $802.87 TRUCK PARTS m 121532 CENTURY SAFETY 380V.69 PAINT SUPPLIES --- CFTI 121533 CENTURY SAFE TT IKST t SU PP f21$252.29 SAFETY 9UPPLIEB 1215l3 DICK CEPEM INC 5252.29 "OCR PARTS ' y 1215!4 CMEVRCN LSA INC 53.239.56 OIL 6 ORANGE 121535 CHROPE CRANKSHAFT INC $210.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 121536 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $339.42 HARDWARE m 121537 COMPUTER BAY 33.536.36 COMPUTER REPAIRS 3 12153E CCPPUSAs INC. $507.16 COMPUTSR HARDWARE/SOFTWARE 1215-9 CCPPLSERVE 111.17 COMPUTER SERVICES r.t 121540 CONARD•S PHOTOGRAPHY $283.38 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES Lo 121541 CONNELL GH PARTS / DIV $146.98 TRUCK PARTS 1 121542 CON'SOLICAIED ELECTRICAL GIST $7.124.02 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 121543 CCkTIKERIAL AIR TOILS INC 44,326.79 TOOLS 121544 CCNTIKENTAL LAB PRODUCTS $3,128.40 LAB SUPPLIES r 221545 CONTRACTORS BOON STORE $265.40 PURLICATION 121546 COSTA PES■ AUTC SUPPLY 2850.10 TRUCK PARTS O 121541 CCUNIV 6HCIESALE ELECTRIC $2.766.33 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES N 121548 CHARLES F CPCWLEV CO s97.70 PUMP PARTS 121549 BURLINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL •1.381.40 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES - A 121554 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $42.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE TAX 121551 STATE CF CALIFCPNIA $366.21 DIESEL USE TM 121552 C.6.P.C.A. $80.81 TRAINING REGISTRATION -- N 121553 DAILY PILOT $145.170 NOTICES 6 ADB 121554 DA141ELS TIRE SERVICE $1.682.23 TIRES 121555 DATA-CAL CCRP $78.85 COMPUTER SOFTWARE -- - - 121556 CATA ELECTRONICS $213.35 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 121557 DE ANZA CORPORATION $150.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 121558 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS $169.33 LAB SUPPLIES -- - - - --- — 121559 DEZURIK AND/OR CS CO $3.897.63 VALVES 121560 DIALCG IAFORPATICN SERVICES S3.49 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 121561 OIATEC E6LIRCNPEKIAL •1.653.55 - CBEMICALB - - -- ----- ------ 121562 DIETEPICH - POST CC $51.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES 121563 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP $76,100.61 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 121564 OOPADO ENTERPRISES INC S43.315.72 - PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS-- -- ---- 121565 EPA SFPVICES INC $931.28 ENGINEERING SERVICES P2-44 121566 EAS7PAN INC 33.866.16 OFFICE SUPPLIES 121567 ECOANALYSIS INC $4,098.57 CONSULTING SERVICES - 121568 ENCHANTER INC $4.410.00 OCEAN MONITORING N.0.7-17-91 G!l FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/16/92 PAGE 3 W REPORT NUMBER AP43 CCUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIP£ PAID 04/22/92 POSTING DATE 04/22/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 121569 ERSECO-CALLAB $5.009.00 LAB SERVICES 121570 ARCUE CLECIRCKICS 91,006.99 RECORDER REPAIRS 121571 ELPOPA WFEELS $304.42 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 1215T2 MARSHALL FAIRRES $170.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 121573 JOHN R FALKENSTEIN PE $3.400.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 121574 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP $992.25 AIR FREIGHT -_-- 121575 FERRELLEAS 5102.06 PROPANE n 121576 57 PARK PL62A HOTEL 8767.90 TRAINING REGISTRATION 121577 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURA 5500.00 PUBLICATION m 121578 FISCPER I PCRTER CO $6,337.88 INSTRUMENT Z 121579 FISHER SCIEKIIFIC CC $1.906.71 LAB SUPPLIES C 121560 FLUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $709.34 PUMP PARTS n 121581 CLIFFORD A TORRENT 519.107.11 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-12-91 221582 FCUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT 9245.67 PAINT SUPPLIES 121583 FCX ENIEFFRISES $1.825.00 SAFETY CONSULTANT 3 121584 FIX IROL'SIRIAL SALES 5321.51 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 121585 THE FOXBORO CO S488.19 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 221586 FREDERICK PUPP A ENGINEEFIN $208.35 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES LID 121587 BUT FREY $71.16 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 121508 CITY OF FULLERTGN $20.48 WATER USE 121589 GOT, INC. S554.06 OFFICE SUPPLIES 3a 121590 GANAHL LUMBER CO 33,467.03 LIMBER C— 121591 GENERAL IELEPHCKE CC 59.651.37 TELEPHONE SERVICES r 121592 CHARLES P EEPBE $250.00 - SEMINAR ty 121593 6IENLICH-PITCHELL INC 523.139.51 MECHANICAL PARTS 121594 GOLD AL/UDS EC $110.23 MECHANICAL REPAIRS Cn 121555 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES INC $318.00 - PUBLICATION - ' 122596 GRAHAM I .PMES 5986.67 LEGAL SERVICES - MONTROSE CLAIM A 221597 DIN GREET L ASSOCIATES 215.423.00 SURVEYING SERVICES SPEC 5-051 C"1 - 121598 GREENFIELD. TURBOW. SCHIFF MOB $235.00 MEDICAL CLAIM - SECOND OPINION --1 121599 FROTH EQUIPMENT CORP $2,046.00 VALVES N 12160D GRCVE INVESTMENT $3.205.21 REFUND USER FOS OVERPAYMENT 121601 HP TYPE I ERAFNICS $34.68 PRINTING - - - 121602 HAAKER ECLIPPENT CC 5275.01 TRUCK REPAIRS 121603 FRED A HANPFR 51.500.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 122604 HARRINGICK INDUSTRIAL PLASII $103.27 VALVES ' 121605 FL HAWK CO INC SIQ52.49 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1216W6 JCEL 6 FELGPETH FH.O. $2.550.00 MASTER PLAN CONSULTING 121607 MIXON METAL FINISHING $2,894.83 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT — - - 121608 HORIZON HIGH REACH S EQUIP $21.53 TRUCK REPAIRS 121609 J.T. NORVFIH A ASSOC. $3.000.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, J-17 122610 RS HU6ME5 CC INC $156.16 PAINT SUPPLIES 121611 HUNTER CORPORATION $909.775.00 CONSTRUCTION J-29-1 121612 CITY OF HUNTINGTON REACH $7,520.91 WATER USE 121613 HUNTINGTON APC/JEEP/RENAULT 5298.65 TRUCK PARTS -- - -" -' 121614 HUKTIKGION BEACH RUBBER SIR $290.93 OFFICE SUPPLIES L'U t4 FUND NO 9199 JT DIST VCPNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/16/92 PAGE A DEPORT NUMBED AP93 CCbhIY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/22/92 POSTING DATE 04/22/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 221615 HLATIKGICN SICKAL OIL CC 9236.68 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 121616 HUNTINGTON SUPPLY •101.35 HARDWARE 121617 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHVINN C $323.25 BICYCLE PARTS - 121618 HURLEY ELECTRONICS INC $13.04 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 121619 ICM CCNIRCLS INC S499.05 ELECTRIC PARTS 222620 IMPERIAL VEST CHEMICAL 359.282.1`6 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.0-13-91 - - 121621 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS 942.83 CONNECTORS 121622 INGERSOLL-RAND EOU I CORF 562.09 TRUCK PARTS fVl 121623 INLANC E/PINE EQUIPMENT CO. $762.48 TRUCK PARTS - - -- -- Z 121624 INTENNATICNAL SENSOR TECH 555.9E INSTRUMENT PARTS C 121625 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $552.27 BATTERIES rD 122626 IRVI At RANCH WATER DISTRICT $82.92 WATER USE - -- - 121627 GREAT AESIERK SANITARY SUPP $1.042.25 JANITORIAL RUPPLIES 121628 JIP.S SLEFEKSICN SERVICE 1259.83 TRUCK PARTS TIT 121629 JOHNSON A HIGGINS $5.150.00 TRUCK PARTS 3 121630 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $1.416.60 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES Z�h 123631 JOUAN. INC $994.39 LAB EQUIPMENT Lo 121632 NALLEEN•S COMPUTER PPOOUCTS - $70.29 INSTRUMENT PARTS 121633 N1NO BEARING 16C $5.1111.18 MACHINE SUPPLIES 1 122634 EASTMAN KODAK CO 9101.70 LAB SUPPLIES n 223635 MARTIN KCPOICN SR $2,963.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 r 1216l6 LC RESOLPEES 31,075.74 COMPUTER SOFTWARE f- 121637 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO 3490.72 SERVICE AGREEMENT 121638 CRC PRESS INC. 145.00 PUBLICATION 121639 LIFPERT CORPDRAIIGN $573.50 BLECTRIC PARTS (n 122640 LIPIT CP DO CC RP $1.943.71 ELECTRIC PARTS 121641 KP LINDSTROM INC 55.100.88 CONSULTING - ENVIRONMENTAL ;C) 221602 LOPAIN PRODUCTS 91,252.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT f"1 121643 MFS 173.17 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES ,1 121644 MACOPCO 1473.20 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT fA 221695 MAIHIENAKCF FHCCLCIS INC 9951.46 REPAIR MATERIALS I21696 MANTEK $136.12 ELECTRIC PARTS 121647 NARCFL ELECTRONICS 5631.03 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 121648 PARVAC ELECTRGNICS $86.29 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 121649 MAIT . CPLCP INC $2.004.41 CHLORINATION PARTS 121650 MCMASTf R-CARR SUPPLY CO 9776.13 NECRARICAL PARTS 121651 MICROSOFT 51.082.64 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 1216.2 MICLAV PIE I PACPINIKE $4.857.69 PUMP PARTS 121653 MIKNESOIA AESTEFR VISUAL YRES. S49.57 OFFICE SUPPLIES 121650 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO $432.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 121655 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES $1.000.00 LAB SERVICES 121656 MCTICA INEUSTR1ES INC $342.72 MECHANICAL PARTS 121657 PCTnRCLA INC 55.792.01 INSTRUMENTS 121658 NI INDUSTRIES, INC. 52.520.00 REFUND USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT 121659 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $190.18 SAFETY FILM RENTALS - - 121660 NEAL SLFFLY CO 52.360.T6 EGGS OIL FUND NO 9199 JT GIST YCRNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/16/92 PAGE lP REPORT NUMBER AP43 ` COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIPS HID 04/22/92 POSTING DATE 44/22/92 --- --- WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 121661 GUST K NEWBERG CONST CO $143.221.70 CONSTRUCTION P1-33 1216E2 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $630.55 ELECTRIC PARTS 1216E3 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 14.25 WATER USE 121664 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $250.06 WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAM 121665 NOVEX $1.632.82 LAB SUPPLIES 221666 OFFICE FAVILICN/INTERIOR RES $950.39 OFFICE FURNITURE '- - 121EE7 CAE FCCKET FLIGHT GUICE SB7.44 SUBSCRIPTION ]a 12166E CA SYSTEMS CO $30,454.05 CHLORINE M.0.10-10-91 m 321669 ORACLE CORPORATION 310,234.06 COMPUTER SOFTWARE ' m 121670 ORANGE CCUNTY CHEMICAL CO 31.914.37 HYDROCHLORIC ACID 2 121671 OMANFE VALVE 1 FITTING CO. $2,156.27 INSTRUMENT PARTS C 121672 CWL SCIENTIFIC PLASTICS $204.81 LAB SUPPLIES a 121673 OXYGEN SERVICE $1.044.89 SPECIALTY GASES 121674 CSOOC SELF-FLNOEO PEOICAL 1 $100.000.00 SELF-FUNDED HEALTH INS. PREMIUM ADVANCE —I 121E75 CCUNTY SANITATICN DISTRICT $12,976.98 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FUND 3 121676 COUNTY CF GRANGE $81.00 PERMIT FEES 121677 PACIFIC ENERGY RESOURCES $703.76 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 121678 PACIFIC PARTS $2,650.95 INSTRUMENT PARTS LID 221679 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CC $3 AB0.20 SAFETY SUPPLIES 1216R0 FACTEL PERIDIAN SYSTEMS SB 7.53 TELEPHONE SYSTEM HCDIFICATIONS 121681 PAGE NET 154.00 PAGER RENTALS n 121682 PALMIERI♦ TYLER. WIENER. $6.790.63 LEGAL SERVICBS - OIL WELLS T— 121663 PARTS LNLIPITED $1.459.10 TRUCK PARTS - r 121684 PATTEN CCRP/ TAYLOR INSTR 5272.08 INSTRUMENT PARTS C 12168E ROY PCNDERGRAFT 1460.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 32168E FF.NKIN-ELP ER CORPORATIOk 1392.36 LAB SUPPLIES CN 321687 PIMA GPO SYS7EPS INC $99,533.40 RESIDUALS REMOVAL H.O.5-6-91 - p 12168E PIONEER BANK $15.842.40 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 5-34-3 121669 PITNEY BOWES $992.81 HAINTBNANCE AGRcxmzw f7 121690 PLAINS IRUEVALUE HARDWARE 6100.49 HARDWARE y121691 PCLYPETRICS. INC. $341.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 121692 PCLVFLRE INC 115.315.31 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-87 121693 PCVERSCAN INC $112.66 COMPUTER PARTS - - 121694 POWER SYSTEMS $437.76 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 121695 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $84.00 ICE 121696 PRCFERSICRAL TREE CARE $659.00 GROUNDBKEEPING SERVICES 321697 ThE FROaECT SCLUTIONS CO. $4.602.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O.7-17-91 121698 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $421.91 ELECTRIC PARTS 121699 RAINPOV CISPCSAL CO $1,300.17 TRASH REMOVAL 121700 RED LINE PAC $260.00 STREET SWEEPING 121701 PEOI EXPRESS $69.38 LAB SERVICES 121702 - THE REGISTER - 260.45 NOTICBS & AIDS 123703 THE REPL'ELTC SUPPLY CO $2.156.15 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 121704 J P PCOEPTS CCPF $295.273.00 CONSTRUCTION 3-23-1 121705 PEGGY RUPP $540.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION ---- - - 121706 RYAN-NERCO $4.131.14 PUMP PARTS OU FUND KC 9199 J1 GIST LCRKIKG CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/16/92 FAST 6 ClY REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/22/92 POSTING DATE 01/Y2/92 ------ -- VAGRANT NC. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 121707 JOSEPH T RYERSON L SON IN $481.98 METAL 12174E SAFI WIFE INC 9116.30 ELECTRIC PARTS 121709 SAFFTV-KLEEk COOP 3161.50 PARTS CLEANER 121710 SAFETY SUPPLY CF AMERICA S311.91 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 121711 SANTA FE INDU37RIAL PLASTICS $567.44 VALVE PARTS 121712 DOUG SARVIS $525.00 DRIVER/CPR TRAINING - 121713. SCIENCE AFPLICA7IONS IAT.L $88.896.37 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-12-91 121714 SEA CCASI CESIGAS S902.06 INSTRUMENT PARTS n 121715 CITY OF SEAL BEACH 9169.50 WATER USE -- n' 121716 SEARS ROEBUCK k CO $494.82 TOOLS Ofll 121717 SECURITY SPECIALISTS $160.00 SECURITY SYSTEM PARTS 12171E SEPPINTIK CCNVEYCR CCRP 27.971.45 MACHINE SUPPLIES - - - - n 121719 SHAMROCK SUPPLY 51.458.1E TOOLS 121720 SILVERI 6 LE BOUEF 8142.581.6E CONSTRUCTION 5-34-3 121721 SKYPARK LALK•Ik MEDICAL CLI $1.021.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL BAW48 - m 121722 SLIDE YAITER $216.96 PRESENTATION AIDS 3 122723 SMITH-EMEPY CO $874.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-17-91 zit: 221724 SONNENSCHEIN NATM N ROSENTH 5203.50 LEGAL SERVICES - PERSONNEL LD 121725 SC COAST AIR QUALITY $52.600.00 PERMIT FEES 121726 SOUTP COAST AIR QUALITY 512.221.30 EMISSION PERMIT FEES 1 121727 SCUTk CCAST WATER $87.50 EQUIPMENT RENTAL n 121728 SO CALIF EDISON CO $2.000.00 BABEHENT 10-1-IA r- 121729 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO $152,109.97 POWER r 121730 SC CAL (AS CO $22.091.76 NATURAL GAB 121731 SCUTPERK COLKIIES CIL CC $13.393.38 DIBBBL/UNLRADBD FUEL 121732 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER 22,472.67 COOLER RENTAL/WATER N 121733 WESTALLOV INC 5253.29 WELDING SUPPLIES --- --I 121734 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS INC $376.52 PLUMBING SUPPLIES .� 121735 CAPRCLL S STARK S ASSCC $501.17 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES C7 121736 STAR TOOL A SUPPLY CC - $2,124.98 -- TOOLS - - - 121737 STONE CONTAINER $3.866.51 REFUND USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT N 121738 STRATAGEM[ R412.00 LAB SUPPLIES 121739 SIROMROIKE PRINTING 5204.73 PRINTING - - - - - --- 121740 SUMMIT STEEL 51.857.41 METAL 121741 SUPLLCO INC $459.27 LAB SUPPLIES 121742 SUPER CHEF CORP 9670.80 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES - - - 121743 SIRAkTEC CORP $50.02 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 121744 TEMPERATURE STANDAROS LAB $326.09 LAB SERVICES 121745 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 5452.27 MSCKANICAL PARTS - - -_- ---------- 121746 THCRPE INSULATICK $61.43 BUILDING MATERIALS 121747 TOKV•S LCCK S SAFE SERVICE 5118.4E SECURITY LOCK 121748 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE INC - - $92.50 SAFETY SUPPLIER - - - ---- ----- 121749 TRAVEL TRAVEL $1.050.50 TRAVEL SERVICES M.O.6-12-91 121750 TRUCK I AUTO SUPPLY INC $184.07 TRUCK PARTS 121751 JG TUCKER S SCA INC $4.870.41 FILTERS - --- - 121752 TWINING LABDRATORICS Of $7.784.00 BOIL TESTING W I� FUND NC 9199 • JT DIST LCRRIAG CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/16/92 PAGE 7 V REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID b4/22192 POSTING DATE 04/22/92 WARRANT N0. VEADOP AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 122753 ULTRA SYSTEMS $1,412.22 ENGINEERING SERVICES 121754 LAICAL $72.05 UNLEADED GASOLINE 121155 WAITED PARCEL SERVICE 1362.38 PARCEL SERVICES 121756 UNITED STATES ELEVATOR CORP $454.15 SERVICES AGREEMENT 121757 UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS $119.00 SUBSCRIPTION 121755 VCC TESTING $3,000.00 EMISSIONS TESTING 121759 VLR SCIEA7IFIC 12.252.71 LAB SUPPLIES 3a 121760 VALIN CCPFCRATICN 12.743.70 FILTER 121761 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO $3.714.56 PLUMBING SUPPLIES - m 121162 VAPIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS 1107.75 LAB SUPPLIES Z 12170 VELIE CIRCL17S $2,550.00 REFUND USER FEB OVERPAYMENT t% 1217E4 VERTE} SVSTEFS $1.690.00 COMPUTER DATA SERVICES n 121765 VILLAGE NURSERIES 1733.24 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 121766 CARL WARREN P CO $558.28 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR "1 121767 WESTERN CCRPCPATE IMAGES $2,417.91 LAB EQUIPMENT 3 121768 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY 129.416.2P CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-8-90 121769 WESCO $1.249.94 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 4t, 121770 NFROS CORP $1.702.62 COPIER LEASES LD 121771 IIENGRTH I ALPEP/C.S. ALPEP $95.608.00 CONSTRUCTION P2-42-1 1 12I172 21EBAPTF A6D ALFER $35,910.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-34-1 121713 RI CM AM 8 EDGAR 12U0.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION n --------"""'.. r f— TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 04/22/92 34.813.346.63 - ' � SUMMARY AMOUNT A fl OPEN FUND f639.49 C"7 f2 OPEN FUND $2,573.26 f2 GP PAC FUND 34,035.67 f3 OPEN FUND d$1,104.00 f3 CAP RAC FUND $5,270.66 45 OPBR FUND 65,345.60 NS CAP FAC FUND it65$245.76 f6 OPEN FUND ,583.85 f7 OPEN FUND $4,415.52 N7 CAP FAC FUND $7,368.26 413 OPEN FUND 37,$63.84 N14 OPEN FUND $27.42 414 OPBR FUND 382.15 414 CAP FAC FUND $1,285.53 8566 MR FUND 61$102.26 f561 GP FAC FUND ,449.98 f7614 OPFR PVND 63,959.66 JT OPEN FUND ,537,778.24 CORE f3$114,535.93 SELF RUINED INSURANCE FUNDS $186,739. 7 '- OU JT NORRING CAPITAL ----------- V 54=8=='396 63_ � , COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .1 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA April 9, 1992 10004 ELLI6 AVENUE v O.BOX 0121 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 8272E-0127 M E MO RANDU M 010862.2111 TO: J. Wayne Sylvester FROM: Ted Hoffman SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF TWO (2) CAB AND CHASSIS SPECIFICATION NO. A-169 Sealed bids were opened Tuesday, April 7, 1992, for the purchase of two cab and chassis. Tabulation of bids is as follows: DEALER UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE GMC Truck Center $15,194.00 $30,388.00 Santa Fe Springs Inland Empire White, GMC 17,594.00 35,188.00 Riverside Theodore Robbins Ford 17,912.00 35,824.00 Costa Mesa Carmenita Truck Center 19,131.00 38,262.00 Santa Fe Springs It is recommended the award be made to GMC Truck Center, low bidder for their proposed amount of $30,388.00, plus sales tax. Sufficient funds have been budgeted for this purchase. Res ec y submitted, Ted NoffmJnt Purchasing Manager We treby concyrwith the/above recommendation: y G. Wreed Director V Finance L46) Edwin E. IUIdges Assistant Director of Maintenance "C" AGENDA ITEM #10(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C" RESOLUTION NO. 92-39 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF 12.5% ODIUM HYP CHL RITE SOLUTION. SPECInTATITN NO. P-1 1 REBID A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF 12.5% SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION, SPECIFICATION NO. P-131 (REBID), TO JONES CHEMICALS, INC. The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recomnendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Purchasing Manager that award of contract be made to Jones Chemicals, Inc. for Purchase of 12.5% Sodium Hypochlorite Solution, Specification No. P-131 (Rebid) and the bid tabulation and recommendation, and proposal submitted for said specification are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That a Purchase Contract for Specification No. P-131 (Rebid) I be awarded to Jones Chemicals, Inc. for the unit price of $0.44 per gallon plus �i••' sales tax, furnished and delivered in accordance with the terms and conditions of said specification and the bid proposal therefor, for a one-year period beginning May 14, 1992, with provision for four one-year extensions upon mutually-agreeable terms; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign said Purchase Contract with said supplier to supply 12.5% sodium hypochlorite solution pursuant to the specifications and purchase contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel ; and, . Section 4. That all other bids received for said material are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 13, 1992. "D-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-1" April 15 1992 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS MEMORANDUM ul ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 1p 4EwS AVENUE TO: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager =o eo. FOUNTAIN vaLlEr.BOX FO81RNlA 921P9 81 zl n+m sszz4n `✓ FROM: Katherine Yarosh, Senior Buyer SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF 12.5% SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION SPECIFICATION NO. P-131 (RE-BID) Sealed bids were opened April 7, 1992,for the purchase and delivery of 12.5%Sodium Hypochlorhe Solution for a one-year period beginning May 14, 1992. Tabulation of bids is as follows: PRICE ESTIMATED COMPANY PER GALLON ANNUAL COST Jones Chemicals $0.44 $37,400.00 Torrance, CA GPS Industries $0.48 $40,800.00 City of Industry, CA Western States Chemical $0.49 $41.650.00 Supply Corp. Orange, CA DX Systems Company $0.49 $41,650.00 Rancho Cucamonga, CA Ali Pure Chemical Co $0.54 $45,900.00 Santa Fe Springs, CA Ashland Chemical, Inc. $0.65 $55,250.00 Santa Fe Springs, CA It Is recommended the award be made to Jones Chemicals, Inc., the lowest responsible bidder, for a one-year contract period beginning May 14, 1992, The total estimated annual cost of $37,400.00, plus applicable sales tax, Is based on 85,000 gallon usage at a unit price of $0.44 per dry gallon delivered. Provisions are In the specifications for four consecutive one-year contract extension periods. D A ��RJIl/Til� {o�o-3� Katherine Yarosh, Senlor Bt yer We hereby concur with the foregoing recommendation: / 7 ✓ Ted Hof an, Purc ng Mane `.►y 6. Robert J. Ooten of Assistant Director of Operations 'D-20 AGENDA ITEM #10(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-2° COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Eight (8) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE May 13. 1992 JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Beduet) E 5B,902.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - REVISED NEUTRAL GROUNDING TRANSFORMER Detailed Specification 66-5300 requires a 1000 KVA neutral grounding transformer and contract drawing 2E13 specifies an impedance of 8 percent. This item is for providing a 1,500 KVA neutral grounding transformer with an impedance of 2.5 percent as required by Southern California Edison (SCE). A credit is included in this item for the original neutral grounding transformer. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Ref. PCH J191-020) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: E 37,729.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - CABLE TRAY AND CONDUIT MODIFICATIONS FOR INFLUENT PUMP POWER CABLES Contract drawing 4E01 requires that twelve 500 MCM power cables be Installed in an existing cable tray between Power Building 3A and the Influent Pump Room in Headworks No. 2. This cable tray is divided into two compartments with one compartment holding power cable and the other holding control wiring. An existing fiberglass barrier separates the two compartments. Field investigations determined that installing the new 500 MCM power cables in the power side of the tray would violate the maximum allowable cable fill requirements specified in the National Electric Code. This item is the addition of a new fiberglass barrier in the existing cable tray to create two new compartments and the relocation of the control wiring into one of these compartments. The new power cable will be installed in the second new compartment. Additional work Included in this item is new cable tray required In the basement of Power Building 3A, support of control wiring at tray intersections to provide separation between control wiring that cannot be relocated and the new power cable, and the rerouting of conduit and control wiring from the new power cable section of the cable tray into the new control wire section in fourteen locations. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Ref: PCH J191-014) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: E 21,173.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "E-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. N0. 'I (8) 19 CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE May 13, 92 JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1 TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 58.902.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date February 21, 1991 Original Contract Time 600 Calendar Days Original Completion Date October 12, 1992 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 13 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 613 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date October 25, 1992 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price E 15 410 855.00 Prev. Auth. Changes E 1 12 This Change (Add) (wedxet) L 58 0 Amended Contract Price E 15,618,014.00 "E-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3 P. O. .BOX 8127 - 108" ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. N0. Eight (8) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE_Mayes. 199 JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1. Job No. J-19-1 Board Authorization Date: May 13, 1992 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED BY: RECOMMENDED BY: A� ,k- 3 2 _/ Engineer Date Construction manager Bate APPROVE BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: rec ar of nglneer ng Da a GeneralCounsel ' bate HUNTER CORPORATION ACCEPTED BY: G� t�� 3 2G•9z CiL on rac or Date "E-3" AGENDA ITEM #10(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13) CONTRACTOR: BRINDERSON CORPORATION DATE_ May 13. 1992 JOB:. CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. J-19-2 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 351,479.23 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - POWER SUPPLY CABLES The Contract drawings did not provide electrical circuits for the 24 12 volt DC power supply mounted in electrical panels 28PNLIOI through 28PNL501 ocated in the basement on the engine pedestals in the Central Power Generation Building. These circuits are to provide speed signals back to the engine governor. The Contractor was instructed to provide the labor and materials necessary to install the raceway and cable on a negotiated lump sum basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b)(2)(A) . (Reference: PCH No. 076 and Brown & Caldwell letter dated December 30, 1991) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 7,621.50 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - EMISSIONS MONITORING CIRCUITS The Contract drawings did not provide the power requirements for the emissions monitoring equipment located in the Control Room. This equipment monitors the emissions of the five engines in the Central Power Generation Facility. The Contractor was instructed to install the raceway, cable, duplex receptacles for five sample pumps, two air dryers and necessary circuit breakers. The work was performed on a negotiated firm price basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) . (Reference: PCH No. 088 and Brown & Caldwell letter dated March 4, 1992) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 11,807.13 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 3 - GENERATOR CONTROLS CABLING The Contract drawings did not provide for the following electrical circuits: ... 1. Control signals between five generator controls in the main switchgear and the five engine control panels (28CP101 through CP501) to initiate synchronizing, generator breaker and loading. "F-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 6 P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 `arJ CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13) CONTRACTOR: BRINDERSON CORPORATION DATE May 13, 1992 JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. J-19-2 2. Signals for the sump pump seal leakage detectors located in the basement. 3. Power supply for the cooling fans in the five engine control panels. The Contractor was instructed to provide the labor and materials necessary to install the raceway and cable on a negotiated lump sum basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) . (Reference: PCH No. 089 and Brown & Caldwell letters dated February 29 and March 9, 1992) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 30,158.23 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 - IGNITION BOOSTER CIRCUITS The Contract drawings did not provide the electrical circuits for the ignition boosters for the five engines in the Central Power Generation Facility. These circuits provide 24 volt DC power between starting booster power pack and Control Panel 28PNLIOI through 28PNL501. The Contractor was instructed to install the necessary raceway and cable on a negotiated lump sum basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6gb) (2) (A) . (Referenced PCH No. 085 and Brown & Caldwell letter dated February 21, 1992) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 13,142.37 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 5 - REDUCE RETENTION The Districts are authorized, pursuant to law and basic agreement, to withhold a retention amount up to ten percent (10%) and not less than five percent (5%) of the final contract price. Due to the fact the contract is considered nearly complete, the retention now being withheld ($1,000,000.00) will be reduced to $500,000.00. The remaining retention will be held until a final close out agreement and release of all claims has been fully executed. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "F-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE �J FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13) CONTRACTOR: BRINDERSON CORPORATION DATE May 13, 1 9 JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-19-2 Item 6 - RELEASE OF CLAIMS In consideration for the reduction of retention and the agreements of Items 7 and 8 of this change order, the Contractor acknowledges that no changes made by the Districts since Change Order No. 8 (December 11, 1991) have impacted the project schedule, and that no claims, other than for direct cost recovery, will be made for actions taken prior to May 13, 1992. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 7 - ADDED CRITERIA FOR RECEIPT OF EARLY COMPLETION BONUS Item 6 of Change Order No. 8 provided criteria for receipt of early completion bonus. As part of the negotiations for the resolution of the costs incurred within this change order, and to clarify necessary changes in those criteria, the following is added as criteria for receipt of early completion bonus. It will not be possible to operate the generators parallel with Edison (described in Change Order No. 8). Change Order No. 8 documented that possibility, however, a provision was not included for Central Power Generation Facilities tie-in to both of the power duct systems within Treatment Plant No. 2. The bonus will be determined upon completion of the test described in Item 6 of Change Order No. 8 using available digester and natural gas fuels. Because of the Edison tie-in not being completed, it will not be possible to place total plant load on the entire central power generation system. A test will be conducted with available digester gas and load. Due to the changed testing criteria, the maximum bonus as specified in Item 6 of Change Order No. 8 will be raised from $525,000 to $555,000, per Item 8 of this change order. The test will be started as soon as the tie-in to Power Duct A is complete. The tie-in to Power Duct B will be concurrent. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "F-3" AGENDA ITEM #10(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-3" CUUNIY SAN1IA11UN UibTR1Clb OF URANGE CUUNIY Page 4 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13) �.✓ CONTRACTOR: BRINDERSON CORPORATION DATE May 13, 1992 JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-19-2 Item 8 - TIE-IN TO POWER DUCT A The Specifications call for tie-ins to both Power Duct A and Power Duct B, with Power Duct A being first. The power ducts are adjacent to each other. Power Duct A has six conduits with power cables while Power Duct B has five conduits containing power cables. Districts' staff directed the Contractor to proceed with the connection to Power Duct A and leave Power Duct B out of service to avoid the possibility of an accident. The Specifications did not include this provision. Districts' policy dictates no work on energized high voltage ductwork and must be out of service. Contract specifications did not reflect this requirement and thus caused the Contractor and Districts' operations to change the specified approach to perform the work. The tie-in was made at selected times when the plant could be placed out of service, using existing engines and generator power. Accordingly, the Contractor is allowed extra time and extended overhead for compensation for the added cost and delays necessitated by this addition to the contract. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 60,000.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 10 Calendar Days Item 9 - MEDIUM VOLTAGE ELECTRICAL SWITCHGEAR MODIFICATIONS After initial designs, it was determined that various modifications must be made to the medium voltage switchgear to insure the complete compatibility of operation between Districts-furnished equipment (engines, generators, etc.) and the Contractor-furnished equipment (engine oil centrifuges and pumps, cooling water treatment and pumps, air compressors and all other auxiliary equipment). These items of work had been omitted from the original drawings but were determined later to be necessary for this very complicated system to function properly. These changes in the Central Power Generation Facilities are as follows: A. Additional Generation Protection - Addition of diodes (12) , resistors (6) and circuit breakers with a short trip energized from the Model 86 lockout relay to provide additional protection for the six generators. B. Motor Starter Modifications - Increase size of fuses, change push buttons to push-to-test lights, add a current transformer for the main breaker and modify wiring for the three gas compressors in the Gas Compressor Building. C. Synchronizing Relays - Add synchronizing relay (Woodward Model SPM-A) for each of the five generators to provide better controlling of speed during the synchronizing cycle of two or more generators. "F-4" AGENDA ITEM #10(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 / CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13) CONTRACTOR: BRINDERSON CORPORATION DATE May 13, 1992 JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. J-19-2 D. VAR and Power Factor Control - Add a selector switch-and relay on the master generator control for the six generators to regulate generated VARS whenever either or both of the generator bus to distribution bus tie breakers are closed. The controller will regulate generator power factor as well . E. Other various modifications: 1. Add a manual synchronizer cart. 2. Add ground and test devices. 3. Add motor operated potentiometers in synchronizing voltage matching function. 4. Add breaker cells and risers. 5. Add 24 VDC bus throughout switchgear. 6. Add surge suppressors to main bus A, B and G close to main breakers. 7. Add current transformers at tie breakers for totalizing generator output. 8. Add voltmeter switches to read both main bus and incoming voltages. 9. Install time delay relays in trips circuit device to eliminate breaker race circuit. 10. Add auxiliary relays on generator cubicles to provide base loading or load sharing functions. 11. Install surge suppressors and mimic bus. The Contractor was instructed to provide labor and materials on a negotiated firm price basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) . (Reference: PCH Nos. 025, 048, 054, 057 and 071 and Brown and Caldwell letters dated December 20, 1990; July 8, August 16, August 28 and December 9, 1991) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 228,750.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 351,479.23 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 10 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 10 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct ... or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. "F-5" AGENDA ITEM #10(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-5" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 6 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER �.rJ C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13) CONTRACTOR: BRINDERSON CORPORATION DATE May 13. 1992 JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. J-19-2 SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date March 19, 1990 Original Contract Time 730 Calendar Days Original Completion Date March 17, 1992 Time Extension this C.O. 10 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 218 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 948 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date October 21, 1992 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 19,753,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 1,214,928.32 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 351,479.23 Amended Contract Price $ 21.319.407.55 Board Authorization Date: May 13, 1992 COUNTY OF SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA S IT RE fMENDED BY: Vg g —u- L Engineer Date Construction Manager Date APP BY: APPROVED AS TO //FORM: / Director of Engineering Date Ge eral Counsel Date BRINDERSON CORPORATION ACCEPTED BY: Contractor Date "F-6" AGENDA ITEM #10(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-6" l COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Twenty (20) CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH & ALPER DATE May 13, 1992 JOB: GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-34-1 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 10,548.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - INDUSTRIAL WATER CONNECTIONS Contract Drawing 1Y19 shows industrial water piping routed through Tunnel No. 8 to an interface point to piping installed under the Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities project. This item is for industrial water connections to the west Foul Air Scrubber, Tunnel No. 8 washdown piping, and for added pipe and fittings required to interface with the clarifier project referenced above. These connections are not shown in the contract drawings. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,514.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - REROUTE INDUSTRIAL AND POTABLE WATER LINES AT INTERSECTION H - Four 12KV conduits are being routed into Intersection H under the Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1 project. These conduits tie into existing 12KV conduits in the intersection. National Electric Code requirements do not allow the additional bends required to reroute the conduits through the existing piping at this intersection. The industrial water and potable water piping was relocated to the top of the tunnel intersection to allow room for the conduits to pass straight through the intersection to their points of connection. Additional work in this item also includes pipe support modifications on other pipe systems in Tunnel No. 6 adjacent to Intersection H. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's Force Account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Ref: FCO P1341-022) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,034.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 10,548.00 `J TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days "G-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE 1 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Twenty (20) CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH & ALPER DATE May 13, 1992 JOB: GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-1 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date February 27, 1990 Original Contract Time 730 Calendar Days Original Completion Date February 26, 1992 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 90 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 820 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date May 26, 1992 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 13,098,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 572,965.00 This Change (Add) (Redact) $ 10,548.00 Amended Contract Price $ 13,681,513.00 "G-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Twenty (20) CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH & ALPER DATE May 13. 1992 JOB: GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-34-1 Board Authorization Date: May 13, 1992 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED BY: RECOMMENDED BY: /J ^� U 316-9 L i�- t- J -LE- fL Engineer U Date Construction Manager Date APPRO BY: AAPPROVED AS TO FORM: ctor of Engineering Date / General Cou sel Date ZIEBARTH & ALPER ACCEPTED BY: Xontrl9or Date "G-3" AGENDA ITEM #10(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Nine (9) CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors Division of DATE May 1j�l L�— urn onstructors, Inc. JOB: Construction of Di esters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1 Job No. P1- 4- Re litation o D1 esters 9 and 1 at Rec amation Plant No. 1 Job o. P - 5- and Insta at ono waste ester Gas are Fac lit es at Pants 1 and Job No. J- 1 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 75,678.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Job No. PI-34-3 Item 1 - DRAINAGE CHANNEL ADDITION Existing tunnel drain locations differ from those shown on the Contract Drawings. The Contractor was directed to add a small drainage channel to facilitate flow from an existing floor drainage channel to a floor sink in the new Control Building. This item provides for labor and materials for the added channel. The work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO NO. 15) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: E 1,094.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - MODIFICATION TO 30-INCH RISER PIPING The Contractor was directed to modify the openings in the 30-inch riser piping in the center of each of the six new digesters. The modifications were required to allow forproper design flow characteristics within the digester and were not shown on the Contract Drawings. The work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO No. 33) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: E 2,040.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days Item 3 - DISTRICTS SUPPLIED LIGHT FIXTURES This item incorporates the use of 28 G-Rated light fixtures which were surplus for another construction project. Direction was given to the Contractor to delete 28 G-Rated light fixtures from the contract work and use the fixtures supplied by the Districts. The credit associated with this item involves material cost only, as installation of the lights is still required. The credit was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO No. 34) DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (3,500.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "H-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Nine (9) CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors. Division of DATE May 13. 1992 Zurn Constructors, Inc. JOB: Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-34-3: Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-35-2: and Installation of Waste Digester Gas Flare Facilities at Plants 1 and 2. Job No. J-21 Item 4 - CONTROL BUILDING FLOODING A Districts sump pump in an existing tunnel failed, and as a result flooded the Contractor's work area on two occasions. This item provides for the labor and equipment to clean up the area and pump the water out of the newly constructed Digester Control Building. The work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO No. 35) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,444.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 5 - CONTROL BUILDING ROOF SLAB MODIFICATION The contract plans show drain elevations to be three inches lower than the high points in the roof slabs of the two Digester Control Buildings. This dimension does not allow for proper concrete coverage over reinforcement steel at drain lines near beams. The most cost effective solution to this conflict was to direct the Contractor to add additional concrete to the roof slab and eliminate the need to modify reinforcement steel . The work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A in the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO No. 38) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,000.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 6 - REVISIONS TO 30-INCH DIGESTER RECIRCULATION PIPING The Contractor was directed to perform several modifications to the 30-inch recirculation piping located below the six new digester slabs. Approximately 780 feet of piping is affected by this change. The modifications involved revisions to the specified support system, increased strength of the concrete encasement and changes to piping joints. The specified underground concrete supports were deleted and replaced with stainless steel rod hangers. The unsuitable soils encountered below the pipeline necessitated the change in piping supports. The weight and fixed point connection design of the specified concrete supports may have subjected the pipeline to undetermined stresses during the anticipated settlement between the digester slab and the concrete encased pipeline. The specified concrete strength of the encasement was increased from 2,500 psi to "H-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Nine (9) CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE Mayes, 1992 Zurn Constructors, nc. JOB: Construction of Di esters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1- - • Rehabilitation of Digesters and 1 at Rec amation Plant No. 1 Job No. P1- - • and installation of waste Digester Gas Flare -7-acilities at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. - 1 4,000 psi. The changes to the piping joints required modifications to the specified concrete encasement. The referenced piping was a critical item on the Contractor's original project schedule. These modifications resulted in a total delay of nine days. The work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO No. 4, PCL No. 33, 43, 56 and 61) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 66,193.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 9 Calendar Days JOB NO. J-21 Item 7 - MODIFICATIONS TO FLARE PIPING The Contractor was directed to modify the low fire flare piping on the new flares at both plants. The modifications were not shown on the contract plans but were required to provide a smooth transition to the medium and high fire burners. These changes were performed on the four new flares and were necessary to avoid AQMD permit violations. The work was performed on the Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B in the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO No. 32) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,607.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 75,878.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 9 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 9 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. "H-3" AGENDA ITEM #10(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Nine (9) CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors. Division of DATE May 13. 1992 Zurn Constructors. Inc. JOB: Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-34-3: Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-35-2: and Installation of Waste Digester Gas Flare Facilities at Plants 1 and 2. Job No. J-21 SUMMARY OF MILESTONE TIME Job No. P1-35-2 Original Contract Date January 28, 1991 Original Milestone Time 365 Calendar Days Original Milestone Completion Date January 27, 1992 Milestone Modification This Change Order 0 Calendar Days Total Milestone Modification 28 Calendar Days Revised Milestone Time 393 Calendar Days Revised Milestone Date February 24, 1992 Job No. J-21 Original Contract Date January 28, 1991 Original Milestone Time 180 Calendar Days Original Milestone Completion Date July 26, 1991 Milestone Modification This Change Order 0 Calendar Days Total Milestone Modification 25 Calendar Days Revised Milestone Time 205 Calendar Days Revised Milestone Date August 20, 1991 SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Job No. P1-34-3 Original Contract Date January 28, 1991 Original Contract Time 900 Calendar Days Original Completion Date July 15, 1993 Time Extension this C.O. 9 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 21 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 921 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date August 5, 1993 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 27,205,378.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 476 015.54 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 75,878.00 Amended Contract Price $ 27,757,271.54 "H-4" AGENDA ITEM #10(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Nine (9) CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors. Division of DATE May 13, 1992 Zurn Constructors. Inc. JOB: Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-34-3: Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-35-2: and Installation of Waste Digester Gas Flare Facilities at Plants 1 and 2. Job No. J-21 Board Authorization Date: May 13, 1992 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMIT BY: RECOM�NDED BY: f t fl 740 jL7 �L Engineer Date Cotfstruction Manager Date APPROV APPROVED AS TO FORM: Director of Engineering Date Gen •a ounsel j LLDate ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, DIVISION OF ZURN CONSTRUCTORS, INC. ACCEPTED BY: ��ZIC(2 Contractor Date "H-5" AGENDA ITEM #10(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-5" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Three (3) CONTRACTOR: Zi eba rth 8 Alper and C.S. A1Der DATE May 13, 1992 Construction Co. JOB: Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-1 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Dedne-t) $ 46,087.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - MODIFY CIRCUIT BREAKERS The eleven circuit breakers for the low voltage swltchgear as specified in the Contract Specifications, Section 66-0650, have current limiting fuses rated for 200,000 ARMS1 (Interrupting Rating (Amperes) Symmetrical Current). This would create a potential coordination problem with the downstream Motor Control Centers ("MCC' s") and Variable Frequency Drives ("VFD' s"). The swltchgear manufacturer, Square D Co. , proposed a breaker, 416H, that would cause no physical change to the layout of the switchgear enclosure vertical sections. The Contractor was directed to provide the subject breakers at cost pursuant to General Provisions Section 10-6(b)(2)B. (Reference: PCH No. 007) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 14,350.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - EQUIPMENT RELOCATION The contract drawings did not provide the necessary clearances between the new and existing electrical equipment in the Electrical Control Roam of the Plant Water Pump Station to meet the National Electric Code requirements. The new equipment consisted of a transformer, three VFD's and three harmonic filters. Included in the relocation of equipment was conduit and cable for primary section of the transformer, removal and relocation of existing electrical items interfering with placement of the VFD's such as receptacles, emergency lighting, etc. , and a phase transition for the bus duct on the secondary section of the transformer. Also included was a six Inch high curb around the transformer to retain spilled transformer oil . The Contractor was instructed to provide necessary labor and materials on a negotiated basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b) (2)A. (Reference: PCH No. 017) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 14,620.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "I-1" AGENDA ITEM #10( h) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Three (31 CONTRACTOR: Ziebarth 8 Alper and C.S. Alper DATE May 13, 1992 Construction Co. JOB: Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-1 Item 3 - ADD ROLL-UP DOOR CIRCUITRY The Contract drawings did not provide for electrical power supply for the 12 foot by 12 foot roll-up door at the north end of the Headworks Power Building "B". The Contractor was instructed to furnish labor and materials to install conduit and wire on a negotiated basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b)(2)A. (Reference: PCH No. 020) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,840.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 - ADD VIBRATION SWITCH CIRCUITRY The Contract drawings did not provide for 120V power branch circuitry for a total of twenty-six pump and motor vibration switches located in Headworks B and C, Plant Water Pump Station and the Primary Effluent Pump Station. Power was derived from the SOV (Solenoid Operating Valve) circuit available at the J-Box of each motor and pump. The Contractor was instructed to furnish labor and materials to install conduit and wire on a negotiated basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b)(2)A. (Reference: PCH No. 021) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,814.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 5 - HARMONIC FILTER CONTROL POWER The contract documents did not provide for control power for the five electrical harmonic filters located in the second floor electrical rooms of the Ocean Outfall Booster Station. The harmonic filters are necessary in the operation of the VFD's that operate the electric motor driven pumps. The Contractor was instructed to provide the necessary labor and materials to install conduit and cable on a negotiated basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b)(2)A. (Reference: PCH No. 022) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 9,463.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 46,087.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days "I-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(h) - ALL DISTRICTS "]-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Three (3) CONTRACTOR: Zieba rth & Al er and C.S. Alper DATE May 13, 1992 onstruction Ca. JOB: Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-1 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date March 12, 1991 Original Contract Time 480 Calendar Days Original Completion Date July 3, 1992 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time Not Applicable Revised Final Completion Due Date Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 9,369,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 51,628.00 This Change (Add) (Beduet) $ 46,087.00 Amended Contract Price $ 9,466,715.00 "1-3" AGENDA ITEM #10( h) - ALL DISTRICTS "1 -3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Three (3) CONTRACTOR: Ziebarth 8 Al er and C.S. Al er DATE May 19� 9�2 ons ruc on 0. JOB: Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-1 Board Authorization Date: May 13, 1992 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED BY: RECOMMENDED BY: 47�! 9Z ��- —d-9L �..✓ Engineer Date Coorstruction Manager Date APPROVED Y: APPROVED AS TO FORM: D ector of Engineer ng Da a Gener#ycounsel Date ZIEBARTH 8 ALPER AND C. S. ALPER CONSTRUCTION CO. ACCEPTED BY: CDntralktor 13 Date `...� "I-4" AGENDA ITEM #10(h) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 0127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 �+accW� April 22, 1992 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum No. 2 to Professional Engineering Services with John Carollo Engineers in Connection with Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43 In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engi- neering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with John Carollo Engineers Addendum No. 2 to the professional services agreement for \/ the preparation of design, plans and specifications, and construction support services for Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43, on an hourly-rate basis including labor plus overhead, direct expenses, subconsultants, and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed $76,760.00, as follows: Existing Change per Amended Agreement Addn. No. 2 Agreement Engineering Services, (hourly rates including labor plus overhead at 156%) , not to exceed $1,359,589.20 $60,770.00 $1,420,359.20 Construction Support Services and Preparation of 08M Manuals, (hourly rates including labor plus overhead at 160%), not to exceed 223,425.80 0.00 223,425.80 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 67,990.00 8,700.00 76,690.00 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 34,200.00 0.00 34,200.00 Fixed Profit 229,600.00 7,290.00 236,890.00 TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed $1,914,805.00 $76,760.00 $1,991,565.00 J-1" AGENDA ITEM #10( i ) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 91 ORANGE COUNTY, CAUEORNIA Boards of Directors 1O EW AVENUE County Sanitation Districts P.a 90R 9197 of Orange County E WAIN VAME .MUFORNiA 9972 April 22, 1992 n1m M4411 Page Two The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/William Mahone /s/Evel n Hart W ho liam Maney velyn ar Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Thomas M. Dawes Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering Selection Committee NJ_ZN AGENDA ITEM #10( i ) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS RESOLUTION NO. 92-40 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN, CONSTRUCTI N SUPPORT SERVICES AND PREPARATION OF OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUALS FOR JOB NO. P1-38 AND JOB NO. P2-4 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES AND PREPARATION OF OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-38, AND MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-43, PROVIDING FOR CHANGES TO THE SCOPE OF WORK AND ADDITIONAL DESIGN SERVICES TO INCLUDE SAFETY ITEMS, LANDSCAPING DESIGN AND ODOR CONTROL ENHANCEMENTS * * * * k k * * * k * k k k k k k WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design and construction support services and preparation of operation and maintenance manuals for Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to said agreement provided for revisions to the errors and omissions insurance requirements; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend said agreement to provide for changes to the scope of work and additional design services to Include safety items, landscaping design and odor control enhancements; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of Directors on January 8, 1992, the Selection Committee has negotiated and certified a fee for said additional services, in accordance with established procedures for the selection of professional services. "K-1" AGENDA ITEM #10( i ) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-1" NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 2 dated May 13, 1992, to that certain Professional Services Agreement dated June 12, 1991, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and John Carollo Engineers for design and construction support services and preparation of operation and maintenance manuals for Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43, providing for changes to the scope of work and additional design services to include safety items, landscaping design and odor control enhancements, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased by an amount not to exceed $76,760.00, as follows, which increases the total authorized compensation from $1,914,805.00 to an amount not to exceed $1,991,565.00: Existing Agreement Change per Amended As Amended Addendum No. 2 Agreement Professional Services, at hourly rates for labor plus overhead at 156%, not to exceed $1.359,589.20 $ 60,770.00 $1,420,359.20 Construction Support Services and Preparation of 08M Manuals, at hourly rates for labor plus overhead at 160%, not to exceed 223,425.80 -0- 223,425.80 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 67,990.00 8,700.00 76,690.00 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 34,200.00 -0- 34,200.00 Fixed Profit 229,600.00 7,290.00 236,890.00 TOTAL, not to exceed $1,914,805.00 $ 76,760.00 $1,991,565.00 "K-2" AGENDA ITEM #10( 1 ) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-2" Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for `✓ itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 2 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 13, 1992. "K-3" AGENDA ITEM #10( i ) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-3" RESOLUTION NO. 92-41 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH DAMES & MOORE T CONDUCT SEISMIC STUFY ELEMENT OF JOB NO P1- 8- AND P2-4 - A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH DAMES 8 MOORE TO CONDUCT SEISMIC STUDY ELEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PI-38-3, AND SEISMIC STUDY ELEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-43-2, PROVIDING FOR REALLOCATION OF COSTS AMONG CATEGORIES WITHIN SAID AGREEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR A NAME CHANGE TO DAMES 8 MOORE, INC. , A DELAWARE CORPORATION k k * k * * * * k k k * k k WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with Dames and Moore to conduct Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-3, and Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-2; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to said agreement provided for expanding the scope of work to include preparation of plans and specifications for Seismic Retrofitting of Headworks B and C at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-2-1; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend the agreement with Dames and Moore to provide for reallocation of costs among categories within said agreement, with no change in the total maximum authorized compensation, and to provide for a name change to Dames 8 Moore, Inc. , a Delaware Corporation; and, NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 2 dated May 13, 1992, to that certain Professional Services Agreement dated October 10, 1990, by and between County "L-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(J ) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-1" Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and Dames and Moore, to conduct Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-3, and Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant, No. 2, Job No. P2-43-2, providing for reallocation of costs among categories within said agreement, with no change in the total maximum authorized compensation, and providing for a name change to Dames 8 Moore, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That said reallocation of costs shall be as follows and shall not change the maximum authorized compensation of $840,620.00: Existing Agreement Amended As Amended Addendum No. 2 Agreement Professional Services, at hourly rates for labor plus overhead at 180%, not to exceed $627,540.00 $ -0- $627,540.00 Direct expenses, �✓ not to exceed 17,800.00 5,000.00 22,800.00 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 125,000.00 (5,000.00) 120,000.00 Fixed Profit 70,280.00 -0- 70,280.00 TOTAL, not to exceed $840,620.00 $ -0- $840,620.00 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 2 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 13, 1992. "L-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(1 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 9127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92729-9127 wyery 10944 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92709-7018 ""7+E cm1 (714)962-2411 April 22, 1992 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Professional Services Agreement with Carleton Engineers 8 Consultants, Inc. for Specialized Engineering and Consulting Services on South Coast Air Quality Management District-Related Issues In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with Carleton Engineers & Consultants, Inc. for specialized engineering and con- sulting services to the Districts on South Coast Air Quality Management District-related issues, on an as-needed basis at hourly rates for three one-year periods beginning June 1, 1992, as follows: Specialized Consultant Services, at hourly rates, as follows: $125.00 per hour, June 1, 1992 through May 31, 1993 $127.50 per hour, June 1, 1993 through May 31, 1994 $130.00 per hour, June 1, 1994 through May 31, 1995 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/William D. Mahoney /s/Evelyn Hart William D. Mahoney Evelyn Hart Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman Selection Comnittee Selection Committee /s/Thomas M: Dawes Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering Selection Committee "M" AGENDA ITEM #10( k) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "M" RESOLUTION NO. 92-42 'APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ARLETON EN INEER AND NSULTANTS INC. FOR `..� PECIALIZED CONSULTING SERVICES A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CARLETON ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS, INC. FOR SPECIALIZED CONSULTING SERVICES RELATIVE TO DISTRICTS' COMPLIANCE WITH THE SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT'S RULES AND REGULATIONS x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with Carleton Engineers and Consultants, Inc. for specialized consulting services relative to Districts' compliance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District' s rules and regulations; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of Directors on April 8, 1992, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has negotiated and certified the final negotiated fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Professional Services Agreement dated May 13, 1992, by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County and Carleton Engineers and Consultants, Inc. for specialized consulting services relative to Districts' compliance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District's rules and regulations, is hereby approved and accepted; and, "N-1" AGENDA ITEM #10( k) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-1" Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, on an as-needed basis, for three years, from June 1, 1992 to May 31, 1995, at the following hourly rates: Agreement Period Hourly Rate 6/01/92 - 5/31/93 $125.00 6/01/93 - 5/31/94 127.50 6/01/94 - 5/31/95 130.00 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 13, 1992. "N-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(k) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS AI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 10944 ELLIS AVENUE MUMALN VALLEY.MIMRNIA S2726-8122 A O1AIS623A11 May 5, 1992 STAFF REPORT PHASE I UPGRADE OF COMPLIANCE DATA BASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, SPECIFICATION NO. S-064 umma The Districts' Compliance Division provides technical and scientific oversight of the monitoring program specified in our 301(h) modified NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit and has principal responsibility for communicating with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board on this matter. One of the Division's tools is a computerized data base management system (DBMS), which plays a key role in our evaluation and reporting of data, which was developed over the past few years at a cost of approximately $75,000. The Compliance Division now recommends expanding the computerized data base management system to incorporate the Districts' historical ocean monitoring data (pre-1985) with our current ocean monitoring program data (post-1985). This data base would include specialized analytical tools developed for marine monitoring work which will be incorporated directly into the data base system. The purpose of the data base would be to provide readily available comprehensive access to over 20 years of ocean monitoring data to the Districts' staff, regulatory agencies, legislative bodies, and other interested parties. Staff recommends a phased approach to upgrading the DBMS that is consistent with the burgeoning data collected and the continued growth in regulatory requirements. Staff is recommending that Phase I of the upgrade proceed at an estimated cost of $90,000. Background The DBMS is used by the Compliance Division to manage the NPDES monitoring program and to provide compliance and quality control oversight. This includes active preparation of required regulatory reports, provision of timely management assessments of program costs and benefits, and preparation for additional analytical responsibilities assigned the Compliance Division and its outside contractors. An upgraded DBMS will greatly simplify data handling and reduce the cost of future contracts by standardizing data formats and providing greater access along with appropriate security to protect these vital program records. `..' 110-11, AGENDA ITEM #10( 1 ) - ALL DISTRICTS 110-11, The Districts have collected over two decades of monitoring data. We believe that the ready availability of a secure, accurate, and comprehensive data base is essential in assuring that marine wastewater disposal continues to be an environmentally appropriate 1\� and cost-effective strategy for the Districts. This will be particularly important during the public review process of our NPDES ocean discharge permit renewal based on Section 301(h) of the Clean Water Act which will begin when EPA finally makes a tentative decision on our application which we submitted in August 1989. Phase I Phase I of the DBMS upgrade is estimated to cost $90,000 ($75,000 for a contract to design, program and implement a more powerful DBMS and $15,000 for commercial software programming tools and additional necessary hardware to manage the system with existing personnel). The upgrade would preserve Compliance's existing investment in a PC-based Novell network and specialized stand-alone software for ocean data evaluation. This would also assure us greater upward compatibility with other in-house data base management systems, especially the new Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS), which will be linked to most departments of the Districts, and anticipates future outside needs. An important task for Phase I will be a thorough examination and documentation of our historical and recent data. This review will emphasize quality control, data reformatting and standardization issues in an effort to create compatible and consistent versions of the historical and recent ocean monitoring data. These will be loaded into the data base system, resulting in a single, 20-year archive of the Districts' monitoring �✓ data. Data will be imported into the data base from fixed-format files supplied by the Districts and its contractors. The standard developed under this contract will provide long-term formatting requirements for all future marine monitoring data as well. The data base system will serve as an active data arcbive with facilities to generate reports and to extract data into other general purpose software programs and into highly specialized custom programs. Phase I is envisioned to include four tasks. The first is an inventory of all existing data, data formats, levels of quality and documentation. Missing data or other inadequacies will be resolved before programming begins. The second task will be the initial design of the system utilizing prototype concepts. Meetings with Districts' personnel, review of existing software systems, discussions with the Districts' Information Services Department, and initial working prototypes of the system design will be used to develop a custom system. The third task will refine the initial draft design of the system and complete the detailed programming. The fourth task will include final program installation, delivery of system documentation and source codes and provision of user support. "0-2" AGENDA ITEM #10( 1 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-2" Future Phases After the Phase I work is completed, two future additional phases are envisioned. First, we will address our existing NPDES ocean discharge permit requirement of submitting computer files to EPA's national computer system. This process will be streamlined and in the future will be done by staff (these Ocean Data Evaluation System [ODES] reports are currently accomplished by contract with EcoAnalysis, Inc. and SAIL, Inc.). Second, a Geographical Information System (GIS) mapping component will be developed to link into a regional monitoring program if and when it is developed by the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) and others. These two phases would add approximately $150,000 - $200,000 to the overall DBMS system. However, offsetting a portion of this cost will be the savings incurred during the annual submission of the ODES data by Districts' staff because it will be more cost- effective compared to having the task performed by a contractor. Also justifying this potential future cost will be that the GIS link will meet a demonstrated need for a greater (regional) ocean environment perspective that has been identified by the National Research Council as a critical need in their 1990 report "Monitoring Southern California's Coastal Waters." Prequalification of Firms The Compliance Division believes that to make the DBMS successful, the firm designing the system must be uniquely qualified. Therefore, fume should be prequalified prior to b! seeking proposals for the work. To prequalify, a firm must demonstrate competency in scientific data base design with considerable ORACLE programming background. The firm must also commit a qualified project manager from start to finish to ensure maximum continuity in system development. Additionally, to prequalify a firm must possess a sufficiently large staff pool of experienced ORACLE programmers and other necessary resources to support the project. Access to different computer platforms to test data transfers between systems and the ability to provide necessary technical and analytical support will be major considerations for prequalification. Recommendation Staff is therefore requesting authorization to prequalify potential firms and solicit proposals for Phase I Upgrade of Compliance Data Base Management System (DBMS), Specification No. S•064, for consideration by the Directors at a later date. The estimated cost for Phase I is $90,000. i seasaoon.ar "0-3" AGENDA ITEM #10( 1 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-3" RESOLUTION NO. 92-44 APPROVING LETTER AGREEMENT WITH MUDGE ROSE GUTHRIE ALEXANDER & FERD N TO SERVE AS THE DISTRICTS' CO-BOND UN EL F R THE 1990-92 SERIES C C.O.P. ISSUE `irk A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LETTER AGREEMENT WITH MUDGE ROSE GUTHRIE ALEXANDER & FERDON TO SERVE AS CO-BOND COUNSEL FOR THE DISTRICTS' CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1990-92 SERIES C CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION ISSUE k # k # k * k k * k # # * k # # # # # WHEREAS, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, pursuant to financial needs and requirements described in its Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan adopted July 19, 1989, have determined to issue long-term debt obligations/securities to obtain the necessary funds to complete the development of its needed capital facilities; and, WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore considered several well qualified legal firms to serve as their Bond Counsel , and Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander Ferdon was selected as co-Bond Counsel , along with Rourke & Woodruff, for the Districts' Capital Improvement Program 1990-92 Series A Certificates of Participation issue and the 1990-92 Series B Certificates of Participation issue; and, WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors have heretofore directed the Fiscal Policy Committee and other finance team members, including Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander & Ferdon, to proceed with planning and implementation of the Capital Improvement Program 1990-92 Series C Certificates of Participation. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: "P-1" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (3) (b) - ALL DISTRICTS "P-1" Section 1: That the firm of Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander A Ferdon is hereby appointed and designated as co-Bond Counsel for the forthcoming Capital Improvement Program 1990-92 Series C Certificates of Participation debt issue; and, Section 2: That the terms and conditions of that certain Letter agreement from Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander & Ferdon, dated April 7, 1992, are hereby approved, and payment for said special co-Bond Counsel services, not to exceed the maximum amounts set forth below, is hereby authorized: Maximum Type of Issue/Service Fee Variable Rate Only $ 80,000 Variable and Fixed 100,000 Rate Combination Expenses At Cost and, Section 3. That the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Letter agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 13, 1992. "P-2" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (3) (b) - ALL DISTRICTS "P-2" RESOLUTION NO. 92-45 ' APPROVING MEMORANDUM AGREEMENT WITH ROURKE & WOODRUFF TO SERVE AS THE DISTRI T 0-BOND COUNSEL FOR THE 1 90- 2 SERIES C C.O.P. ISSUE �..� A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MEMORANDUM AGREEMENT WITH ROURKE & WOODRUFF TO SERVE AS CO-BOND COUNSEL FOR THE DISTRICTS' CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1990-92 SERIES C CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION ISSUE WHEREAS, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, pursuant to financial needs and requirements described in its Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan adopted July 19, 1989, have determined to issue long-term debt obligations/securities to obtain the necessary funds to complete the development of its needed capital facilities; and, WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore considered several well qualified legal firms to serve as their Bond Counsel , and Rourke & Woodruff was selected as co-Bond Counsel , along with Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander & Ferdon, for the Districts' Capital Improvement Program 1990-92 Series A Certificates of Participation issue and the 1990-92 Series B Certificates of Participation issue; and, WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors have heretofore directed the Fiscal Policy Committee and other finance team members, including Rourke & Woodruff, to proceed with planning and implementation of the Capital Improvement Program 1990-92 Series C Certificates of Participation. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: "0-1" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (3) (c) - ALL DISTRICTS HQ_1" Section 1: That the firm of Rourke 6 Woodruff is hereby appointed and designated as co-Bond Counsel for the forthcoming Capital Improvement Program 1990-92 Series C Certificates of Participation debt issue; and, Section 2: That the terms and conditions of that certain Memorandum agreement from Rourke & Woodruff, dated April 7, 1992, are hereby approved, and payment for said special co-Bond Counsel services, for a maximum fee not to exceed $7,500.00, is hereby authorized; and, Section 3. That the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Memorandum agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 13, 1991. "0-2" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (3) (c) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-2" RESOLUTION NO. 92-46 AMENDING RESOLUTION N0. 79-20 (CLASSIFICATION ND C MPEN A ON RES L TION RE 1 94 BUMMER WORK PROGRAM �►✓ A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION RESOLUTION NO. 79-20, AS AMENDED, RE 1992 SUMMER WORK PROGRAM FOR PAINTING AND GROUNDS MAINTENANCE The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That a 1992 Summer Work Program for painting, groundskeeping and general cleanup work around the treatment plant facilities is hereby authorized and established; and, Section 2. That Exhibit "B" of Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, is hereby further amended to add temporary, part-time classifications thereto, as set forth below: EXHIBIT 118-4" OPERATIONS 6 MAINTENANCE CLASSIFICATIONS Approximate Monthly Position Authorized Range Hourly Equivalent Classification Classification Personnel No. Rate Salary 30645 Part-time Assistant 37 --- $6.00/Hr. Max --- and that the General Manager is authorized to employ temporary, part-time personnel in said classification; and, Section 3. That the General Manager is hereby authorized to temporarily upgrade up to eight, full-time, permanent, Maintenance Department employees to Temporary Crew Leader status and to increase their compensation one salary range , "R-1" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (4) - ALL DISTRICTS "R-1" (5.5%) during the period set forth below in Section 7; and, Section 4. That the authorized annual expenditure for said Sumner Work `..� Program should not exceed $225,000; and, Section 5. That Resolution No. 91-66 is hereby rescinded; and, Section 6. That any other resolution or motion that conflicts herewith is hereby repealed and made of no further effect; and, Section 7. That the authorizations contained herein shall become effective May 18, 1992, and terminate September 25, 1992. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 13, 1992. "R-2" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (4) - ALL DISTRICTS "R-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 7 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Nineteen (19) CONTRACTOR: Gust K. Newberg Construction Co. DATE May 13. 1992 JOB: PRIMARY CLARIFIERS NOS. 6-15 AND RELATED FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-33 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 954,004.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - RCP MODIFICATIONS During the installation of the large RCP included in the project, unforeseen subsurface soils conditions were encountered which impacted the completion of the pipeline. Poor subsurface soils and resulting damage to the pipe required job changes. This item includes the resolutions to all outstanding components associated with the installation of the entire 5,000 feet of RCP network included in this project. A. Additional Excavation. Rock and Geotech Fabric. The Contractor was directed to remove additional material from below the specified pipeline trench zone due to encountering unsuitable soils which would not provide adequate pipeline support. The unsuitable soils were required to be removed and disposed offsite. Over 10,000 tons of additional rock was supplied and installed to replace the unsuitable soils. Also included in this item is the cost of furnishing and installing approximately 30,000 square feet of Geotech Fabric to improve the stability of the soils below the pipeline bedding zone. This portion of Item 1 resulted in an added cost of $277,240.00. (Reference: GKN #53) B. RCP Joint Repairs. The condition of the existing underlying soils below the pipe line was a contributing factor in causing differential settlement to several RCP joints after installation. Repairs to RCP joints were required to guarantee a leak proof continuous conduit. The joint repair system selected incorporates a special mastic and PVC liner application over the entire joint from inside the pipe and was not shown on the contract documents. The repair system continues to be flexible in the event that future settlement occurs. The special mastic used in the joint repairs requires a dry environment during its curing process. This involved the use of injectable urethane foams to temporarily curtail ground water "S-1" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (5) - ALL DISTRICTS "S-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 7 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Nineteen (19) CONTRACTOR: Gust K. Newberg Construction Co. DATE May 13, 1992 JOB: PRIMARY CLARIFIERS NOS. 6-15 AND RELATED FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-33 infiltration before the mastic application. The temporary fixes significantly increased the cost of the joint repairs and their extent was not anticipated during the selection of joint repair systems. The joint repair system was selected by the Districts and thereby relieves the Contractor from any future warantee work associated with these repairs. This portion of Item 1 resulted in an added cost of $382,481.00. (Reference: GKN #65) C. Pressure Grouting at PEDB. The Contractor was directed to pressure grout the soils below the already installed dual 108-inch RCP south of the Primary Efficient Distribution Box (PEDB) . The pipeline was installed in accordance with the project specifications using a granular material (rock) for support. The PEDB is \d a large concrete structure and was specified to be supported by piles. After installation it was discovered that the RCP had settled and PEBD had not. This created a failure at the connection between the pipelines and the structure. The solution to this problem was to raise the affected pipelines by pressure grouting the soils below the pipeline and repair the damaged areas. In total , six 108-inch RCP were raised in variable amounts to realign the pipeline to specified elevations and to solidify the underlying soils. To curtail future settlement the pressure grouting operation was enacted and involved the services of a specialty contractor to perform the required precise technical work. This portion of Item 1 resulted in an added cost of $41,000.00. (Reference: GKN #91, PCH S17) D. Added Flexible Couplings and RCP Profile Change at EJB Extremely poor soil conditions were encountered in the southerly 500 feet of dual 108-inch pipe entering the Effluent Junction Box (EJB) . On the advise of our soil engineers, it was decided to modify this portion of the pipeline. The Contractor was directed to furnish and install two 108-inch flexible couplings at the RCP entering EJB to avoid settlement failures between the pile supported junction box and the pipeline. Several field closures were also added. The pipeline invert elevation was also changed in an attempt to minimize the contact with unsuitable soils in the area. The pipeline elevation change eliminated the anticipated costly modifications of the specified shoring system at the high voltage Edison towers due to the unsuitable soils encountered. The towers are located ti...� along the specified pipeline alignment outside the plant between EJB and "S-2" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (5) - ALL DISTRICTS "S-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 7 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Nineteen (19) CONTRACTOR: Gust K. Newberg Construction Co. DATE May 13, 1992 JOB: PRIMARY CLARIFIERS NOS. 6-15 AND RELATED FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-33 the southerly property line of Plant No. 1. These modifications were successful in eliminating the need for costly RCP joint repairs in this reach of pipeline and also minimized the extra cost associated with encountering unsuitable soils. This portion of Item 1 resulted in an added cost of $215,879.00 (Reference: GKN #110, PCH #19) E. Extended Overhead Delay The Contractor requested funds to offset extended overhead extra costs associated with the RCP modifications on this project. The RCP installation was determined not to be a critical item on the project schedule. This eliminated the justification of additional time being given to the Contractor to extend the contract. Through negotiations it was decided that all extra costs associated with the RCP modificaitons included in this item were to be resolved on a direct cost basis and included in portions "A" through "D" of this item. This portion of Item 1 resulted in no additional costs to the contract. It is further agreed that work performed pursuant to the above Change Order item was completed at the direction of the Districts and that the Contractor has no warranty obligations with regard to same, nor shall Contractor be liable for damages to the RCP pipeline network or for consequential damages, if any, resulting from any failures attributable to the installation and/or repairs of the RCP pipeline network on this project. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. Portion A $277,240.00 Portion B 382,481.00 Portion C 41,000.00 Portion D 215,879.00 Portion E 0.00 ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 916,600.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "S-3" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (5) - ALL DISTRICTS "S-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 7 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Nineteen (19) CONTRACTOR: Gust K. Newberg Construction Co. DATE May 13, 1992 JOB: PRIMARY CLARIFIERS NOS. 6-15 AND RELATED FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-33 ITEM 2 - REMOVAL OF UNSUITABLE MATERIAL The Contractor was directed to remove and dispose of offsite, approximately 1,500 cubic yards of unsuitable material (in addition to that removed in Item 1A) from pipeline excavations. The material was encountered during excavation of the dual 108-inch pipeline at the southerly property line of Plant No. 1. The unsuitable material was not shown on the contract documents. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (B) of the General Provisions. (Reference GKN #132, FCO #85) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 11,954.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 3 - GROUT RCP JOINTS The RCP Joints that had passed pressure testing were required to be filled to produce a smooth transition between pipes. The Contractor was directed to fill the joint gaps with non-shrink grout. The RCP was specified to be a pressure piping system and grouting the joint gaps was not shown on the contract documents. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: GKN #129) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,000.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 4 - DRAIN PIPE REPAIRS The secondary clarifier drain piping along the 108-inch pipe alignment in Fuentes Road had failed and required repairs. It was determined the nearby pipe trench had caused some of the drain piping failures. This item includes costs for replacing portions of the drain piping that were not caused by the new construction in this area. These repairs were not shown on the contract documents. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General .Provisions. (Reference: GKN #71) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,000.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "S-4" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (5) - ALL DISTRICTS "S-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 7 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Nineteen (19) CONTRACTOR: Gust K. Newberg Construction Co. DATE May 13, 1992 JOB: PRIMARY CLARIFIERS NOS, 6-15 AND RELATED FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-33 ITEM 5 - FOUL AIR PIPING MODIFICATIONS AT WSSPS The foul air piping outlet in the wet well of the Waste Side Stream Pump Station (WSSPS) required modifications. In the event of a pump failure at the WSSPS, the water level in the wet well could raise above the specified foul air piping invert. The piping was modified to eliminate the possibility of flows entering the foul air system. These modifications included added piping and supports and was not shown on the contract documents. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2) (A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #84) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,100.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 6 - GATE REMOVAL AT EJB On February 12, 1992 the Districts experienced excessive flows into the plant due to tremendous rain storms. It became necessary to make use of the newly constructed clarifiers included in this project to maintain flaws within the Districts trunk lines. The clarifier construction was complete and was in testing operations. Down stream of the clarifiers the outlet piping is connected to EJB which was also in testing operations. The Contractor was directed to remove a gate within EJB to allow flows from the clarifiers to be discharged to the Outfall Booster Pump Station. The extra costs involved with this item include the labor and equipment needed to remove and eventually replace a large slide gate during late P.M. hours on a Holiday. This work was not shown on the contract documents and was required on an emergency basis to expedite unanticipated flows within the plant. This item was accomplished to Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (B) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 883) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 10,350.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 7 - MISCELLANEOUS OUTSTANDING EXTRA WORK This item includes the net added costs of several miscellaneous items that were not shown on the contract drawings, but were necessary to complete the project. _ The items are mainly associated with piping changes and are as follows: Waterproofing the penetration of the 90-inch RCP through the metering structure "S-5" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (5) - ALL DISTRICTS "S-5" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 6 of 7 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Nineteen (19) CONTRACTOR: Gust K. Newberg Construction Co. DATE May 13, 1992 JOB: PRIMARY CLARIFIERS NOS. 6-15 AND RELATED FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-33 walls to curtail ground water intrusion, extra costs or credits involved with the 24-inch OCWD tie-in piping, reroute of the 10-inch digester cleaning bed drain, repair of 18-inch VCP at PEDB, installation of added piping supports on 24-inch DIP, relocating fire hydrant piping at north perimeter Road, installation of an extra brick plug in WSSPS piping at Manhole No. 5, additional pipe supports near sludge and scum pumps in galleries, 4-inch temporary waste hauler piping deletion at WSSPS, deleted piping on OCWD service near Blower Building, credit for substituted DIP locking joints on WSSPS discharge piping. Also included in this item are extra costs or credits for curb and gutter modifications at North Perimeter Road, cover plate modifications at the deck of EJB, asphalt paving revisions at the C.M. trailers, motor cover deletions at basins 1 and 2, substituted bulkhead material at future 120-inch opening at EJB, C.M. trailer settlement damage due to nearby pipe trench, deletion of existing manhole on WSSPS piping and access road modifications during traffic reroute due to pipeline construction. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) . (Reference: GKN #'s 64, 66, 70, 76, 84, 98, 109, 126, 127, 137, 138, 142, FCO #77. and PCH A21) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,000.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 954,004.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. "S-6" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (5) - ALL DISTRICTS "S-6" .�. . . ..�� .. , a P. 0. BO% 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Nineteen (19) CONTRACTOR: Gust K. Newbera Construction Co. DATE May 13, 1992 JOB: PRIMARY CLARIFIERS NOS. 6-15 AND RELATED FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-33 SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date November 2, 1989 Original Contract Time 800 Calendar Days Original Completion Date January 11, 1992 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 35 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 835 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date February 15, 1992 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 39,657,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 1,669,659.33 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 954,004.00 Amended Contract Price $ 42,280,663.33 Board Authorization Date: May 13, 1992 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTE BY: RECO (ENDED BY: za Sz u�t En§Tneer Date C nstruction Manager Date APPRO BY: APPR VED AS TO FORM: 7 u yzz ,y Q 7 gz Director of Engineering Date 11 neral Counsel Date GUST K. NEWBERG CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ACCEPTED BY: Contractor 'Date "S-7" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (5) - ALL DISTRICTS "S-7" RESOLUTION NO. 92-59 `J OPPOSING REQUIREMENTS FOR DISCLOSURE OF EX PARTE COMMUNICATION WITH MEMBERS OF THE GOVERNING BODY OF GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, OPPOSING REQUIREMENTS FOR DISCLOSURE OF EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS WITH MEMBERS OF THE GOVERNING BODY OF GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES WHEREAS, SB 1328 - Rosenthal and Presley, has been introduced into the Senate of the California Legislature, which would require disclosure and reporting of ex parte communications with Board Members of the South Coast Air Quality Management District; and, WHEREAS, the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Board of Directors has considered Rule 111 which would require the disclosure and `tom reporting of ex parte communications with the Board Members of the South Coast Air Quality Management District; and, WHEREAS, said proposals for requiring disclosure and reporting of ex parte communications are inconsistent in their application in that they are applicable to some but excludes others; and, WHEREAS, any requirement for disclosing and reporting of ex parte communications with members of the governing body of a governmental entity would inhibit free and open access of the public to its representatives and, thus, would be the antithesis of fundamental tenant of government in this nation; and, WHEREAS, the requirement to submit written reports of oral ex parte communications with members of the governing body of a governmental entity would be time consuming, costly and add substantially to bureaucratic procedures and recordkeeping; and, "T-1" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (6) - ALL DISTRICTS "T-1" WHEREAS, such a requirement for disclosing and reporting ex parte communications with members of the governing body of a governmental entity is an infringement on the rights of citizens to communicate with their representatives; and would improperly place any person inadvertently failing to file a report of such a communication at unnecessary and inappropriate risk and subject to any attendant sanctions. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY express their strong opposition to imposition of any requirement to disclose and report on ex parte communications with members of the governing body of any governmental entity, and urge that any legislative or regulatory body considering such requirements summarily reject the notion. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 13, 1992. "T-2" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (6) - ALL DISTRICTS "T-2" ' RESOLUTION NO. 92-47-1 DEDICATING REVENUES FOR THE PAYMENT OF OBLIGATIONS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DEDICATING ITS REVENUES FOR THE PAYMENT OF OBLIGATIONS WHEREAS, District No. 1 is a County Sanitation District organized and existing pursuant to the provisions of the County Sanitation District Act, California Health & Safety Code Section 4700 et seq. ; and WHEREAS, District is a signatory agency to the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement by and among the several County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California to provide for the joint administrative organization and to jointly acquire, construct and operate wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities dated and effective July 1, 1985; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement, the District is obligated to make payments on a pro rata basis with each of the other signatory Districts to the Agreement, for the construction of joint facilities, and to additionally make payments on a pro rata basis with each other District for the cost of operation and maintenance of the joint facilities; and, WHEREAS, District obtains revenues to meet its obligations under the Joint Ownership, operation and Construction Agreement and under financing agreements from various sources, the most reliable of which are ad valorem property taxes and annual sewer service "U-1" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (7) - ALL DISTRICTS 11U-1" charges; and, WHEREAS, District has delivered certificates of Participation in 1986, 1990 and 1991, as a financing mechanism to assist in paying the cost of the acquisition and construction of District facilities and joint works facilities; and, WHEREAS, District, in the course of the 1986 and 1990-92 certificates of Participation financing, received very favorable credit ratings based upon its financial stability and the reliability of its sources of revenues, thus resulting in more favorable interest rates on the obligations and a lower net cost to the taxpayers and ratepayers of the District; and, WHEREAS, the District, in order to fulfill the capital facilities requirements of its 30-year Master Plan, is contemplating additional Certificates of Participation financing during 1992 and subsequent years, to assist in paying the cost of the acquisition and construction of additional District facilities and joint works facilities; and, WHEREAS, future financing obligations will be most cost effective if the District again receives favorable credit ratings and is able to sell its obligations at the lowest possible interest rates; and, WHEREAS, the District has determined that (a) a dedication of its revenues, and in particular its most reliable revenues, towards the payment of its obligations under the Joint ownership, operation and Construction Agreement and under long-term financing, past and future, will benefit the taxpayers and ratepayers of the District; 2 "U-2" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (7) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-2" and (b) dedicated reliable revenue sources and the related higher credit ratings are of considerable importance to investors purchasing the long-term financing obligations of the District, as is evidenced by the successful prior financing issues which were able to rely upon both the ad valorem tax revenues and the annual sewer service charges. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: To assure the continued financial viability of this District, and for the benefit of all other Districts, and understanding that each other District will similarly make such a dedication, District No. 1 hereby dedicates its revenues, in the following order of priority: First: Its ad valorem property tax revenues, Second: Its sanitary sewer service charges, and Third: Its other revenues, to meet its obligations under the Joint ownership, - Operation and Construction Agreement, the Agreements for Acquisition and Construction and Certificates of Participation, 1966 and 1990-92 Series A and Series B, and any future agreement or agreements for acquisition, construction, maintenance or operations of the sewers, works of other facilities designated by the District as receiving the benefit of this dedication. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 13, 1992 3 "U-3" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (7) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-3" RESOLUTION NO. 92-56 AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 2-30 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 AND 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE MEMORY LANE INTERCEPTOR, CONTRACT NO. 2-30 * * * * It * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 and 2 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the proposed construction contract is for a project which is a portion of the previously-approved Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The project is to be constructed as per the Master Plan approval . In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and Section 15090 of the Districts' Guidelines, Supplement No. 2 to the Program Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan covering this project was approved by the Districts' Boards of Directors on February 19, 1992; and, Section 2. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Director of Engineering that award of contract be made to Mladen Buntich Construction Co. , Inc. for the Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30, and bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That the contract for the Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30, be awarded to Mladen Buntich Construction Co. , Inc. , in the total amount of $3,471,857.00 in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, "V-1" AGENDA ITEM #25(d) - DISTRICTS 1 & 2 "V-1" Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for Itself and as agent for District No. 2, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel ; and, Section 5. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 13, 1992. "V-2" AGENDA ITEM #25(d) - DISTRICTS 1 & 2 "V-2" .1 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA April 28, 1992 10544 ELLS AVENUE °• 11:00 a.m. FO BUN BT 27 2 ADDENDA FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIVOPNIA 8272E-B121 P141N2.24n B I D T A B U L A T I O N S H E E T CONTRACT NO. 2-30 PROJECT TITLE Memory Lane Interceptor PROJECT DESCRIPTION Construct approximately 12,000 feet of 36-inch, 30-inch and 27-inch VCP gravity sewer in the Cities of Orange and Santa Ana. ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $3,800,000.00 BUDGET AMDUNT $3,800,000.00 CONTRACTOR TOCAL BID 1. Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inp., Snnland, CA $3,471,857.00 2. A. W. Davies, Inc., Rancho Cucamonga, CA $3,610,000.00 3. Colich & Sons, Gardena, CA $3,866,219.00 1 / 4. Christeve Corp., Arcadia, CA $4,461,326.00 5. Murray Company, Rancho Dominguez, CA $4,591,980.00 6. Mike Prlich & Sons, South El Monte, CA $4,785,145.00 7. Matt J. Zaich & Sons, Inc., Northridge, Ca $4,848,368.00 8. ARB, Inc., Long Beach, CA $5,388,091.00 I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc. in the bid amount of $3,471,857.00 as the lowest and best bid. de" Q, Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering NV-3" AGENDA ITEM #25(d) - DISTRICTS 1 & 2 "V-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 39 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON APRIL 8, 1992 iTAT104, ?�-A rb .limp ��alsT U �N G�^'GE COV" ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on April 8, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a rluormn present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT N0. 1: x Dan Griset. Chairman _Robert Richardson x Charles E. Puckett, Chairan pro tem Richard B. Edgar -7--Fred Barrera —Gene Beyer _Roger Stanton x Don R. Roth x James A. Wahner _James Ferryman DISTRICT NO. 2: x Iry Pickier, Chairman Fred Hunter x John Collins, Chairman pro tom —George Scott -7--Fred Barrera —_Gene Beyer 7--Buck Catlin —BobChris Norby -7--Barry Denes Bell z William D. Mahoney _James H. Flora z Robert H. Main Norman Culver x Carrey J. Nelson _Glenn Parker a Arthur G. Newton John 0. Tynes _Miguel Pulido x Dan Griset Roger Stanton x Don R. Roth x Henry W. Medea _John M. Gullixson DISTRICT NO. 3: x Sal A. Sapien, Chairman Harry M. Dotson x Burnie Dunlap. Chairman pro tem __Carrey J. Nelson a Buck Catlin _Chris Norby x John Collins _George Scott x Norman Culver Robert H. Main -7—James V. Evans _Margie L. Rice %James H. Flora _William D. Mahoney -7—Don R. Griffin _Rhonda J. McCune z Frank Laszlo _Edna Wilson z Pat McGuigan _Robert Richardson x Eva G. Miner _Larry Herman �✓ z Richard Partin Cecilia L. Age z Iry Pickier —_Fred Hunter z Jim Silva Earle Robitaille Roger Stanton x Don R. Roth —7—Charles Sylvia _Ronald Bates DISTRICT NO. 5: x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman Evelyn Hart x Don R. Roth, Chairman pro tee _Roger Stanton x Phil Sansone _John C. Cox, Jr. DISTRICT NO. 6: x James A. Wahner, Chairman Dick Sherrick x Don R. Roth, Chai m —Roger an pro tem Stanton x Evelyn Hart _Ruthelyn Plummer DISTRICT NO. 7: Richard B. Edgar, Chair an z Charles E. Puckett x James A. Wahner, Chairman pro tan —Nate Reade x Fred Barrera _Gene Beyer x John C. Cox, Jr. _Ruthelyn Plummer x Robert Richardson _Miguel Pulido x Don R. Roth Roger Stanton x Sally Anne Sheridan —Barry Hammond DISTRICT NO. 11: x Grace Winchell, Chairman _Linda Moulton-Patterson x Jack Kelly, Chairman pro tem Don MacAllister _Roger Stanton xDon R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 13: a William D. Ehrle, Chairman _Fred Hunter x Fred Barrera, Chairman pro tom —HenryGene Beyer x John M. Gullixson W. Wedaa z Glenn Parker —Burnie Dunlap x Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chairman _Darryl Miller Salty Anne Sheridan, Chairman pro tem _Barry Hammond -7-Fred Barrera Gene Beyer x Leslie A. Pontiou5 _Richard B. Edgar x Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton -2- 04/08/92 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, . . Rita Brown, Board Secretary, Blake P. l r Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Y' Streed, Penny Kyle, Patti Gorczyca, 1 Gary Hasenstab, John Linder, Margie Nellor, Mary Simpson, Mahin Talebi , Jack Vincent, Chuck Winsor, Ray Young OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel , C.L. Friedersdorf, Peter Green, Walt Howard, Phil Stone x x x x x x x x x x x x x ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Presentation of resolution oF Chairman presented a plaque and appreciation and plaque to resolution of appreciation to retiring Director retiring active Director Peter Green, who represented the City of Huntington Beach on the Board of District No. 3. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman announced that Ted Ado tion of Resolution of Finster had recently retired from the Appreciation for Edwin H. "Ted ' State Water Resources Control Board. Finster u on his retirement as a He noted that Mr. Finster played a member of the California Late key role in the development of the Water Resources Control Board Districts' backbone trunk sewer collection system expansion in the 1950's and 1960's during which time he was Vice President of a major consulting engineering firm. Chairman Mahoney then introduced a resolution expressing the Boards' appreciation to Mr. Finster for his outstanding contributions and dedicated public service in the field of water and wastewater management as a member of the California State Water Resources Control Board. It was then moved, seconded and unanimously carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt, by unanimous acclamation, Resolution No. 92-37, expressing their appreciation to Edwin H. "Ted" Finster and recognizing his outstanding contributions and dedication to public service. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -3- 04/08/92 ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman reported that the Report oT the Joint Chairman Personnel Committee was scheduled to meet on Tuesday, April 14th, at 5:30 p.m. , He also reported that the Fiscal Policy Committee would meet on Wednesday, April 15th, at 5:30 p.m. Chairman Mahoney noted that the Joints Works Selection Committee would meet on Wednesday, April 22nd, at 4:30 p.m. , immediately preceding the Executive Committee, which he then called for Wednesday, April 22nd, at 5:30 p.m. The Joint Chairman also announced that the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee was scheduled to meet on Wednesday, April 30th, at 5:30 p.m. He then advised that the Special Joint Works Selection Committee would meet on Wednesday, May 6th, at 5:00 p.m. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that Report of the General Manager AB 3214, the proposal that would have transferred $347 million state-wide from enterprise special districts to school districts, had been defeated in the State Assembly. If this bill had passed, the impact on the Districts' would have been $35.1 million in lost annual property taxes. This would have increased user fees for the average household by an average of 70%, and in some instances, by as much as 129%. He thanked the Directors for their help in contacting members of the legislature and urging their "No" votes, with a special thanks to Vice Chairman Hart who contacted several legislators while in Sacramento and for convincing an Orange County delegate to change his vote from "yes" to "no". Mr. Sylvester added that the battle was not over. The bill was to be reconsidered by the assembly and stressed that it was important to keep the pressure on the Governor and Legislature. The General Manager then announced that the Districts had been awarded a National Federation of Municipal Analysts Certificate. He pointed out that the goal of this certification is to achieve lower interest costs on debt Issues. He further noted that the Districts' finance staff estimates that this certification may save the Districts 2-5 basis points which, over the course of the life of a 25-year-$100,000,000 issue, could mean as much as $400,000 to $1,000,000 in savings. The General Manager then thanked Gary Streed, Director of Finance, Patti Gorczyca, Finance Manager, Merrill Lynch, Districts' underwriter, Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander 8 Ferdon, and Thomas L. Woodruff, co-bond counsel , for that achievement. Mr. Sylvester then reported that the Districts' Pollution Prevention Program had been selected as a regional nominee for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator's Awards Program. He read a portion of a letter by Daniel McGovern, the Region IX EPA Administrator, congratulating the Districts for this achievement and advising that the project would be forwarded to EPA' s headquarters in Washington, D.C. to compete nationally for the Administrator's Award. The letter also stated that in recognition of being selected as a regional nominee, EPA was presenting the Districts `�� -4- 04/08/92 with the U.S. EPA, Region IX, Pollution Prevention Award, recognizing the project's outstanding contribution to environmental protection through pollution prevention. Mr. Sylvester then congratulated the Districts' Source Control Manager, Margie Mellor, and Mahin Talebi , Principal Engineer, `...✓ for their roles in this achievement. The General Manager also commented on the Directors' orientation and tour scheduled for Saturday, April 25, 1992. He noted that this was primarily for new Directors but encouraged all Directors to attend. He also requested that Directors complete and return the forms included in their meeting folders that evening indicating whether or not they would be attending. Mr. Sylvester then briefly reviewed a past issue involving Beatrice-Hunt/Wesson Foods' non-compliance with the Districts' industrial discharge standards. In the late 1980's stricter discharge requirements were placed on Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson's plant in Fullerton, a major discharger of conventional pollutants. Hunt-Wesson objected to the requirements and filed two lawsuits that were decided in the Districts' favor. Hunt-Wesson then entered into a stipulated agreement with the Districts, agreeing to certain milestones and to implement pre-treatment at their plant. Hunt-Wesson has not fully complied with all of the requirements of the agreement. He reported that Hunt-Wesson has contacted several Directors wishing to discuss the issue. The General Manager advised that because many of the Directors were not on the Board in the late 1980's, staff was preparing a briefing paper which would be mailed to all Board members within the next few days. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 11, 1992, `..✓ the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 11, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 11, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 11, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 11, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -5- 04/08/92 DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 11, 1992, the Chairman ordered that saidminutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 11, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 11, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 11, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 3/11/92 3/25/92 ALL DISTRICTS Joating Fund - E1,746,236.13 E 811,659.40 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1,291,737.25 4,040,557.24 Joint Working Capital Fund - 148,848.97 532,589.23 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 94,081.50 26,160.87 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 1,419.46 7,378.90 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 5,614.76 31,171.92 DISTRICT N� - 64,022.09 30,132.94 DI TRH TE NO. 5 - 476,741.55 23,690.71 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 1,447.64 41.63 DIDI TRI�97. 77 - 81,915.88 22,812.35 DS R 40,813.46 8,414.21I DI TR_I T�NU. - 86.00 .63 DI TRI T NO. 14 - 7,8 .05 12,82863 DIDI TRICTS�5 8 6 JOINT - -0- 1,331.27 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 8 7 JOINT - 3,253.16 -0- DISTRICTS NOS. 7 14 JOINT - 111.83 7 595.26 64,189.73 5,556,3 4.5 -6- 04/08/92 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase of Two 2 Flat Bed Trucks, Specification That the bid tabulation and No. A-155, to Inland Empire White recommendation re award of Purchase GMC of Two (2) Flat Bed Trucks, Specification No. A-155, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Inland Empire White GMC for a total amount not to exceed $42,289.60 plus sales tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase of Seven 7 72-Ton S— tag Trucks, That the bid tabulation and S eciff cation No. A-156 to recommendation re award of Purchase Worthington ord of Seven (7) 1/2-Ton Standard Size Trucks, Specification No. A-156, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and 1s hereby, awarded to Worthington Ford for a total amount not to exceed $B0,234.00 plus sales tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase of One 1 Flat Bed Truck with ate That the bid tabulation and eciff cation No. A-157 to In and recommendation re award of Purchase Empire Wh e GMC of One (1) Flat Bed Truck with Liftgate, Specification No. A-157, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Inland Empire White GMC for a total amount not to exceed $24,372.00 plus sales tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizin staff to issuepurchase orders o Suburban Ford That staff be, and is hereby, re Specification No. A-15 -1 , to authorized to issue purchase orders Folsom Lake Ford re Specification to Suburban Ford in the amount of Nos. A-158-2 andA-15B-4 , and to $39,273.00 plus sales tax for the GMC Truck and re pecif ro purchase of Three (3) 3/4-Ton Pickup icaBuG Trucks (Specification No. A-158-1) ; Folsom Lake Ford in the amount of $10,235.00 plus sales tax for the purchase of One (1) 1/2-Ton Mini Pickup Truck (Specification No. A-158-2) ; GMC Truck and Bus Group in the amount of $24,777.78 plus sales tax for the purchase of Two (2) Cargo Vans (Specification No. A-158-3); and to Folsom Lake Ford to the amount of $15,696.00 plus sales tax for the purchase of One (1) Utility Vehicle (Specification No. A-158-4) , for a total amount not to exceed $89,981.78 plus sales tax, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Cooperative Procurement Program of the State of California, and State of California Contract No. 1-92-23-20. -7- 04/OB/92 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: warding purchase order contract for Open Office Furniture Systems That the bid tabulation and and Free-Standing Furniture, recommendation re award of purchase Specification No. M-035, to order contract for Open Office Integrated Business Interiors Furniture Systems and Free-Standing Furniture, Specification No. M-036, for the new Central Laboratory, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase order contract be, and is hereby, awarded to Integrated Business Interiors, for a total amount not to exceed $136,614.72 plus sales tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 53918 for That Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Specification No. M-0 7 Order No. 53918 issued to Brinderson Corporation for Removal of Precast Concrete Parapets on Headworks B and C at Plant No. 2, Specification No. M-037, increasing the total authorized amount from $84,800.00 to an amount not to exceed $94,836.17, for additional work to remove asbestos roofing insulation to comply with EPA regulations, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awardin Purchase of Ferrous Chloride ecification No. P-129, That the Boards of Directors hereby �../ to I. G. Industrial Corp. adopt Resolution No. 92-30, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Ferrous Chloride, Specification No. P-129, to I. G. Industrial Corp. for the delivered price of $215.00 per dry ton plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning May 13, 1992, with option for four one-year extensions (estimated annual cast $387,000.00 plus sales tax). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 10 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 10 to the plans Job No. J-17 and specifications for Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17, authorizing an addition of $10,301.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for two items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change rder No. 7 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 7 to the plans Job No. J-1 -1 and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, authorizing an addition of $28,862.00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation for six items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. -8- 04/08/92 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Trder No. 12 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 12 to the plans Jab No. J-19-2 and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-19-2, authorizing an addition of $39,235.38 to the contract with Brinderson Corporation for five items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order o. 5 to the glans and specifications for That Change Order No. 5 to the plans Job No. -23-1 and specifications for Control Center/Operation and Maintenance Building, Job No. J-23-1, authorizing an addition of $13,132.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for three items of additional work, and granting a time extension of five calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approvinq Chanqe Order No. 18 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 18 to the plans Jab No. P1- 3 and specifications for Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33, authorizing a net deduction of $10,370.00 from the contract with Gust K. Newberg Construction Company for four items of added or deleted work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving hange r er o. 1 to the lans and specifications for That Change Order No. 19 to the plans Job No. PI- 4-1 and specifications for Gas Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-1, authorizing an addition of $11,108.00 to the contract with Ziebarth 8 Alper for four items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Job No. J-7-4 as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-31, accepting Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Au tho ruin the Selection omoi ttee to ne otiate Addendum No. to the That the Selection Committee be, and Professional Services A reement is hereby, authorized to negotiate with Brown and ai well onsulting Addendum No. 8 to the Professional Engineers re Job No. J-19 Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for design of Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19, to provide for `...� additional inspection and design services. -9- 04ioei92 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Se ecti on Committee to neg0t ate a Professional That the Selection Committee be, and Services Agreement with is hereby, authorized to negotiate a F. E. Carleton Engineers Professional Services Agreement with Consultants, Inc. for specialized F. E. Carleton Engineers and consulting services Consultants, Inc. for specialized consulting services relative to Districts' compliance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District's rules and regulations. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authoriz ng staff to issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order That staff be, and is hereby, No. 49046 issued to ERC authorized to issue Change Order Environmental and Energy Services No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 49046 Co. re ecification No. - 48 issued to ERC Environmental and Revised Energy Services Co. for Laboratory Services for Final Effluent Toxicity Monitoring Program, Specification No. S-048 (Revised), providing for a change in the vendor's name, now known as Ogden Environmental and Energy Services. ALL DISTRICTS Director Robert Main expressed Amendin Boards' action re concern regarding Southern California necessar arran ement with Southern Edison Company's requirement re Eggson Company for parallel Districts' payment of Income Tax opera t12n of power generating Contribution to Construction Tax `...i facilities an for purc aseand relative to Interconnection sale of excess power in connection Facilities Agreement for parallel h the new entra Power operation of power generating Generation System at Treatment facilities and for purchase and sale Plant No. 2 of excess power 1n connection with the Districts' new Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 2. He inquired whether the Districts could appeal to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) or Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to be exempt from this requirement. The General Counsel advised that the tax law has no exemptions. Mr. Woodruff suggested that the best solution would be to talk to lawmakers in Washington to get legislation to change this law. Directors also asked if the Districts could purchase the facilities and rent them to SCEC, thereby avoiding payment of the tax. The Director of Engineering replied that SCEC would not allow the Districts to own their metering equipment and protective relays. • It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards' authorization of May 8, 1991 re necessary arrangements with Southern California Edison Company for parallel operation of power generating facilities and for purchase and sale of excess power in connection with the Districts' new Central Power Generation System at Treatment Plant No. 2, be, and is hereby, amended, as follows, to authorize a new alternative option relative to the Inter-Connection Facilities Agreement [previously listed in May 8, 1991 agenda as 12(c) (3)(c)]: -10- 04/08/92 (c) Uniform Standard Offer 1, Interconnection Facilities Agreement (Appendix G to As-Available Capacity and Energy Power Purchase Agreement) for additional facilities (estimated one-time capital cost of $1,350,000.00 plus Income Tax Contribution to Construction Tax of $459,000.00, plus annual 0 8 M costs of $10,800.00) FURTHER MOVED: That the staff and General Counsel be, and are hereby, directed to study possible alternatives relative to adoption of legislation to change the tax law to allow exemptions relative to payment of Income Tax Contribution to Construction Taxes, and report back to the Boards at a later date. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Re ealin Resotion No. 81-3 re Conflict olu f Interest ode That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-36, repealing Resolution No. 81-36 which approved a revised Conflict of Interest Code which has been replaced by the new Conflict of Interest Code adopted by Resolution No. 91-36. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel reported that 14 Receive and file Summons and Summons and Complaints that are Complaints in connection with the identical , but filed separately by anta Ana River wi enin ro ect individual property owners, had been of the Oran a ount Flood ontrol received by the Districts. He noted District u.5. orps of Engineers that there will probably be several more filed. The complaints relate to property directly across the Santa Ana River from Treatment Plant No. 1. The complaints allege that during the course of the Corps of Engineers' project to widen the Banning-Greenfield Channel and the Santa Ana River widening and lining project, the contractor operated heavy equipment and did drilling that resulted in soil subsidence and foundation shifting and damage to the property owners' homes. He added that a District siphon would be included later in this project, but construction of the siphon hasn't started yet. Mr. Woodruff stated that the complaints have been carefully reviewed and that the Districts are not Involved. The General Counsel then requested authority to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the following Summons and Complaints for (1) Inverse Condemnation, (2) Dangerous Condition of Public Property and (3) Nuisance relative to alleged damage to real property in connection with the Santa Ana River widening project of the Orange County Flood Control District/ U.S. Corps of Engineers (including Districts 6, 7 and 14 siphon construction) , and any additional complaints filed in the future relative to said project, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed: -11- 04/08/92 Name - Case No. Lori Costa 676718 Virginia Bluma 677585 Angela Brough 677586 Carolyn Campobasso 677587 William Lawson and Sandra Lawson 677588 Roberta Coleman 677589 Joseph Romero and Cathy Romero 677590 Joanne Fretty 677591 Jeri Kessler 677592 Gale Burgert and Terry Burgert 677593 Gary Brown and Tamara Brown 677594 Dennis Johnson 677929 Marc Mueller 677930 David Magnuson and Ruby Magnuson 682769 FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts relative to these 14 complaints and any additional complaints filed in the future relative to said project. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Re ce7ve, file antl approve written report of the Special Joint Works That the written report of the 5election committee Special Joint Works Selection Committee's meeting held on March 4, 1992, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written report of the Fiscal Policy That the written report of the Fiscal Committee Policy Committee's meeting held on March 18, 1992, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written report of the Building Cortmittee That the written report of the Building Committee's meeting held on March 31, 1992, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to negotiate a chap a order to the contract with That staff be, and is hereby, J. R. Roberts Corp. , contractor for authorized to negotiate a change Job No. J-17, to Drov1de for order to the contract with J. R. furnishing of the new Molecular Roberts Corp. , contractor for the Microbiology Laboratory Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17, to provide for the furnishing of the new Molecular Microbiology Laboratory in an amount not to exceed $130,000.00, on a time-and-materials basis only, with no allowance for extended overhead. -12- 04/08/92 DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman `..d then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:03 p.m. , April 8, 1992. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:03 p.m. , April 8, 1992. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: djournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:03 p.m. , April 8, 1992. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:03 p.m. , April 8, 1992. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:03 p.m. , April 8, 1992. DISTRICTS 5 8 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit ro osals and ne otiate That the Selection Committee be, and a Professional ervices Agreement is hereby, authorized to solicit for design and construction proposals and negotiate a services for Contract No. 5-37 Professional Services Agreement for design and construction services required for the Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 5-37. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 2 to the l ans and s ecifications for That Change Order No. 2 to the plans Contract No. 5- 4-3 and specifications for Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-34-3, authorizing an addition of $31,430.00 to the contract with Silveri 8 LeBouef for three items of additional work, be, and 1s hereby, approved. -13- 04/08/92 DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Agreement for �../ Cancellation of Covenants Running That the Board of Directors hereby with the Land with The Irvine adopts Resolution No. 92-33-5, Company relative to Annexation approving agreement for Cancellation No. 7 - Irvine Coastal Area of Covenants Running with the Land Annexation with The Irvine Company relative to Annexation No. 7 - Irvine Coastal Area Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 5; and FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager, or his designee, be, and is hereby, authorized to execute future standard agreements for release of covenants for each phased development sequence of the territory within said annexation by The Irvine Company. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Actions re ro PH settlement of Dis rict's claim against Mob Oil Cor oration relative to damages in connection wi h removal of contaminants caused by Mobil Oil a e District' s construction site at Pacific Coast Highway and Ba s de Drive ontract No. 5-34-2 Verbal report of General Counsel The General Counsel reported that in In February 1990 the Directors \� approved an agreement with Mobil Oil Corporation which provided for reimbursement of costs associated with gasoline contamination under the Intersection of BaysIde Drive and Pacific Coast Highway, from Mobil ' s service station on the corner. The gasoline contamination interfered with the installation of Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, and the job could not be completed under the original contract that was to be administered by the City of Newport. Mr. Woodruff further advised that the agreement provided in part that Mobil Oil would provide specialized environmental services and would haul contaminated materials from the site. Under the agreement, the amount of $243,430.00 was estimated to take care of the clean-up. The agreement (Section 2B) stated that an additional 5% over that sum could be spent without notice to Mobil 011. However, any other additional costs over $243,430.00 plus 5% would be paid by Mobil only after Mobil received prior notice of added costs from Districts. The total clean-up costs came to $348,473.00. Mobil Oil has actually paid the total amount of $275,228.00 thus far. In October, the Districts made a demand on Mobil Oil for the remaining difference of approximately $73,245.00. Mobil Oil has refused to pay this amount. -14- 04/08/92 The General Counsel noted that there were two contested issues - (1) whether or not the additional costs incurred could be attributed to normal construction difficulties involved in dewatering the site, or (2) whether the Districts had failed to give the required advance notice to Mobil Oil before incurring additional costs. Mr. Woodruff advised that he and staff negotiated a settlement with Mobil Oil of $36,500.00 (approximately half of the disputed amount of $73,245.00). He recommended acceptance of this settlement offer to avoid further legal and expert opinion costs. Receive and file General Counsel 's Moved, seconded and duly carried: Memorandum That the General Counsel 's Memorandum dated March 25, 1992 relative to proposed settlement of District's claim against Mobil Oil Corporation, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. A rovin Settlement Agreement with Moved, seconded and duly carried: Mobt it orpo tattoo That the Settlement Agreement with Mobil Oil Corporation, providing for payment of $36,500.00 by Mobil Oil to the District re damages in connection with removal of contaminants caused by Mobil Oil at the District's construction site at Pacific Coast Highway and Bayside Drive (Contract No. 5-34-2, Improvements to Bayside Drive Sewer, Phase 2) , be, and is hereby, authorized and approved, as recommended by the District's General Counsel and staff. DISTRICT 5 - Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:07 p.m. , April 8, 1992. DISTRICTS 6 7 8 14 Actions re Su lement No. 2 to EIR for Pra used Formation of ount anttation District No. 14 and Proposed Reor aniza ion o. 7 Involving Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13, re Baker- isler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1 ontract No. 14-1-1A, required due to the court' s determination that The Districts address certain issues not covered in their original EIR Supplement No. 1 relative t0 this Sewer line Verbal report of General Counsel The General Counsel reviewed the past actions taken by the Boards relative to Supplement No. 2 to EIR which addresses certain issues in connection with construction of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Contract No. 14-1-1A. -15- 04/08/92 Mr. Woodruff further advised that the Mesa Verde Country Club has opposed the necessary acquisition of an easement through the northerly `../ boundary of their golf course along Gisler for the construction of the sewer conduit by the Districts and had successfully challenged, in court, the Districts' previous California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documents. Although the court ruled in favor of the Districts on 29 of 31 counts, the court also ruled that the previous CEQA documentation did not adequately address Mesa Verde's maintenance access to Gisler Avenue, or the monitoring and reporting aspects pertaining to mitigation measures for the golf course. The Director of Engineering then gave a slide presentation showing the golf course and surrounding areas affected by the proposed project, as well as the maintenance access to the golf course. The General Counsel also reported that the required Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is currently being prepared and will be implemented by the Districts. Receive and file comments received Moved, seconded and duly carried: on the Notice of Preparation of _ upplement No. 2 to EIR That the comments received on the Notice of Preparation of Supplement No. 2 to said EIR, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file Draft Supplement Moved, seconded and duly carried: No. 2 to EIR That the Draft Supplement No. 2 to EIR for Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13, relative to the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A, required due to the court' s determination that the Districts address certain issues not covered in their original EIR (Supplement No. 1) relative to this sewer line, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Ratif in staffs action re film Moved, seconded and duly carried: a Notice of ompletion and circulating the Draft bupplement That the Boards of Directors No. 2 to EIR hereby ratify staff's action re filing a Notice. of Completion and circulating the Draft Supplement No. 2 to said EIR. Public Hearing The Chairman announced that this was the time and place fixed by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14 for a public hearing relative to any written or oral comments received on the Draft Supplement No. 2 to EIR for Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13, relative to the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A. Open public hearing The Chairman declared the hearing open at 8:15 P.M. -16- 04/08/92 Verbal report of staff The Director of Engineering advised that there were eight comments received on the Notice of Preparation and they are Included in Supplement No. 2. Seven of these comments were from utility companies and one from Mesa Verde Country Club. Mr. Dawes stated that the Baker-Gisler Interceptor begins in the City of Irvine at the Main Street Pump Station in the John Wayne Airport clear zone, and serves the Cities of Irvine, Tustin and Costa Mesa. Several miles of pipe have been constructed and are In the ground between the Airport and Fairview Drive at Baker. The work is already in progress in the Santa Ana River area. The remaining portion is from Fairview Road at Baker to the Santa Ana River, which is the portion of the project addressed in Supplement No. 2 to the EIR. Receive and file written comments Moved, seconded and duly re Draft Supplement No. 2 to EIR carried: That the written comments received to date relative to Draft Supplement No. 2 to said EIR, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. Oral public comments The Joint Chairman recognized Mr. C. L. Friedersdorf, representing the Mesa Verde Country Club (MVCC) , who requested to be allowed to address the Boards relative to Supplement No. 2 to said EIR. Mr. Friedersdorf stated that, in his view, the Districts' proposed project would severely impact the 6th hole of the MVCC. He expressed concern that the Country Club property would not be returned to the same condition as it is now. He was also of the opinion that the Districts were not willing to pay a reasonable price should the property not be restored to its original condition. Mr. Friedersdorf further commented that since MVCC's concerns had been expressed to the Districts on October 10, 1990, he felt that very little had been accomplished and that the Districts had been uncooperative. He also criticized the Districts' architect' s design of the 6th hole to be reconstructed after completion of the sewer project. He indicated that he hoped that the Districts could sit down with MVCC and attempt to reach a resolution of their problems out of court which would include solving the environmental issue of impacting the maintenance access road. He added that the Club' s principal concern is that if the bridge linking Costa Mesa with the Huntington Beach/Fountain Valley area is ever built, there would be no opportunity to build a maintenance road over that. Mr. Friedersdorf also advised that the MVCC had committed to host the USGA Girl 's National Championship next year on their course.He noted, however, that it is now too late for completion of the project and reconstruction of the course in time for this event. -17- 04/08/92 The General Counsel then responded to Mr. Friedersdorf's comments and reminded the Directors that the purpose of the hearing was to focus on the issue of access and whether it is adequately `../ addressed in Supplement No. 2. Mr. Woodruff stated that the facts had been grossly distorted by Mr. Friedersdorf. He refuted his comment that the Districts had not been cooperating with MVCC and indicated that this was a gross misrepresentation. Districts' staff, special counsel , a member of his fim and he had spent hundreds of hours on the project, trying to cooperate with MVCC. Also, the Districts hired a golf-course architect who came up with three variations for the 6th hole reconstruction, which were submitted to MVCC around November 1991. The MVCC's architect had reviewed the proposed design variations and felt they were good solutions. However, the MVCC has not yet responded to the Districts regarding these suggestions. It is the MVCC, not the Districts, that has delayed negotiations and construction of the project. Mr. Woodruff further stated that MVCC had been advised by the Districts to set the date and time for the construction work to begin and the Districts would award a contract around their time-frame, but there was no response from MVCC. Their case has been handled by counsel who is a member of the MVCC. He added that their lawsuit put many things on hold and continuing lawsuits would put them on hold even longer. The General Counsel also stressed that the Districts had offered a fair amount of compensation, but MVCC countered with various speculative sums that far exceed any reasonable basis. He pointed out that the money issue, however, can be resolved by a court. If the two parties cannot sit down and work out the dollars, it is an easy issue for the court to resolve. Mr. Woodruff also stated that the Districts plan to restore the property completely. He noted that the architect had found a way to minimize the removal of the Cypress trees by only removing 6-8 of these trees as the pipe exits Gisler and enters into the golf course property, proceeding parallel with the street. He then reiterated that there had been many, many meetings with MVCC staff, their maintenance superintendent, MVCC's architect, special counsel , Districts' architect and Districts' staff. He assured Directors that the Districts had made every attempt to cooperate and resolve the issues in a fair and equitable manner. In response to questions from Directors regarding the access Issue, the Director of Engineering stated that a temporary bridge would be built for access during construction, and that the MVCC would never have their access cut off. The Joint Chairman then stated that although the purpose of the hearing was to address the issues included in Supplement No. 2 to the EIR, Mr. Friedersdorf's comments had been noted. \�, -18- 04/08/92 Close public hearing The Chairman declared the hearing closed at 8:31 p.m. Directing the consultant, That the consultant, ltrasystems, Inc. , to address any Ultrasystems, Inc. , be, and is written or oral comments received hereby, directed to address any on Draft Supplement No. to EIR written or oral comments received and prepare Final Supplement No. 2 on the Draft Supplement No. 2 to after close of the comment period said EIR, and to prepare the on April 16, 1992 Final Supplement No. 2 to said EIR after the close of public comment period on April 16, 1992. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:33 p.m. , April 8, 1992. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:33 p.m. , April 8, 1992. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 2 to the plans Contract No. 7-11-2 and specifications for Relocation of Michelson Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-2, authorizing an addition of $15,028.00 to the contract with Mitchell Pacific Constructors, Inc. for one item of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering That the Selection Committee Corporation for design of certification of the final negotiated Contract No. 7-17 and preparation fee relative to Professional Services of a Master Plan for Contract Agreement with Boyle Engineering Nos. 7-18 and 7-19 Corporation for design of Replacement of a Portion of Orange Park Acres Sewer, Contract No. 7-17; and preparation of a Master Plan for Orange Park Acres Sewer System, Contract No. 7-18, and Cowan Heights Sewer System, Contract No. 7-19, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. , 92-34-7, approving said agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $205,915.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -19- 04/08/92 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 141 - �...J Tyner Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 92-35-7, ordering annexation of 1.117 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the northwest corner of Meads Avenue and Randall Street in unincorporated County territory (Annexation No. 141 - Tyner Annexation to County Sanitation Sanitation District No. 7). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Actions re Abandonment of Navy way Pump Station and Force Main, and Construction of Replacement Grav ty Sewer, Contract No. 7-20 Verbal report of staff The Director of Engineering reported reported that there are several projects completed or in progress leading towards the abandonment of certain pump stations 1n District No. 7. The District has operated 19 separate sewage pump stations, four of which have been abandoned. Under design are plans for the abandonment of nine more pump stations located on the easterly slope of the Tustin Hills which will drain to the Irvine Ranch Water District's new Harvard Avenue Trunk Sewer. Those abandonments are in various stages of completion. Easements have been secured for some and plans developed for others, but no construction is in progress. It is delayed because of a slowing of development which includes the construction of sewer laterals within the East Tustin Specific Plan area. Mr. Dawes further reported that six pump stations were planned to remain, including the Navy Way Pump Station. This pump station, built in 1969, serves a 950-acre watershed located north of the Tustin U.S. Marine Corps Helicopter Base and east of Red Hill Avenue. Abandonment of this pump station was not previously considered economical because of the longer gravity sewer that would be needed, approximately 6200 feet of 21-inch pipe, costing about $1,300,000. However, this force main is made of Techite pipe and the Districts have recently experienced problems with Techite sewer force main pipe. He stated several years ago the Board instituted a policy of constructing new force mains as dual pipelines instead of single pipelines, which allows the District to switch the flows if one pipe fails. However, the Navy Way Pump Station was built prior to this policy and has only a single barrel force main 2600-feet long made of 16-inch Techite pipe. Since this pipe is now 22 years old, and because of the poor history experienced by the District as well as with all agencies operating such pipe, staff now believes that the Navy Way force main should be replaced. -20- 04/08/92 The Director of Engineering advised the Directors there were two replacement options: (1) a new dual force main that would cost about $665,000; and (2) the abandonment of the pump station and the construction of gravity sewer at a cost of $1.3 million. He stated that staff's recommendation is to replace the Navy Way Pump Station and Force Main with a gravity sewer as it is more reliable than a dual force main and would eliminate pumping costs (energy) and equipment . maintenance, and would have a longer life. He then recommended that the Selection Committee be authorized to negotiate a professional services agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design and construction services required for Abandonment of Navy Way Pump Station and Force Main, and Construction of Replacement Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 7-20. Authorizing the Selection Committee Moved, seconded and duly carried: to ne otiate a Professional Services Agreement with Boyle That the Selection Committee be, En ine 2 ring corporation for design and is hereby, authorized to of Contract No. 7-20 solicit proposals from Boyle Engineering Corporation and negotiate a Professional Services Agreement for design and costruction services required for the Abandonment of Navy Way Pump Station and Force Main, and Construction of Replacement Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 7-20. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:35 p.m. , April 8, 1992. Secretary of the oards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 -21- FUND NO 9199 - J7 DIST WORMING CAPITAL FROCESSING DATE 3105/92 FAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03111/92 POSTING DATE 03111/92 WARRANT NC. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 120585 AG TECH COMPANY 340T.492.85 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 12CS96 AMERICAN TELEPHONE 6 TELEGRAPH s1H25.71 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 120587 A 7 L T $902.63 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 12088E AIR COLC SLFFLY TIC 968.08 AIR CONDITIONING PARTS 120589 AIR FSCOLCIS 6 CHEMICAL IN $16.815.00 ONM AGREEMENT DRY GEN SYST. H.O.8-9-89 120590 AMERICAN CABLING 6 COMM $1.309.95 COMMUNICATIONS SUPPLIES 120591 AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY $75.32 PUBLICATION 120592 AMERSHAM CCBP $295.00 LAB SUPPLIES 120553 AhAHE1M EEWER CONSTRUCTICN 35.853.78 EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIRS DIST 5 6 7 128594 SHERWCOC FEOICAL CO $667.72 LAD SUPPLIES 120595 ANIKTER - DISTRIBUTION $980.24 COMMUNICATIONS SUPPLIES' 120596 ABC LABORATORIES 32.170.06 LAB SERVICES M.O.1-8-92 120597 ARATIM SERVICES INC $5,037.71 UNIFORM RENTALS 120598 ARI2C&A IRSIPLMEhl 37ST.25 INSTRUMENT 120599 ASSOCIATE[ SOILS EASINEERIRG 34.067.50 SOIL TESTING 120600 ASSOC. AOMINIS. s CONSULTANTS $300.00 MEDICAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATOR - 120601 BC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC SIIB.53 TOOL X120602 BRV SAFETY I SUPPLY $1.409.13 SAFETY SUPPLIES = 12OGE3 BANAAA ELLEPPIR7 s10.616.OB BLURPRINTING H.0.10-20-90 1206UR BARTER DIAENCSTICS IRC 312.O4S.03 LAB SUPPLIES by 120605 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS 322.661.74 LAB SUPPLIES 120606 BENNETT-BOWEN $245.05 HARDWARE 120607 BLACK BOP CORP $503.44 COMPUTER SOFTWARE n 12060R BLUE M ELECTRIC CC 3125.05 LAB SUPPLIES I 120609 flCEHRINGER MANNHEIM $703.66 LAB SUPPLIES F-' 120610 BOUT BARN 3T5.32 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 120611 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP 3245.47 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-17 120612 BUILDER-S EMPORIUM $66.72 HARDWARE 120623 GARY 6 ETREED $1,799.53 PETTY CROW REINSURSEMENT 124614 C M 1 $4,273.28 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 120615 COSIPA $75.00 MEMBERSHIP FEES 120616 CS COMPANY $376.04 VALVES 120617 1992 CWPCA CONFERENCE $1,192.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 120628 CALTROL INC $1.939.73 MECNANICAL .PARTS 120619 CALIFCPRIA AUTOMATIC GATE 9555.26 SERVICE AGREEMENT 120620 CA INS1I1LTE OF TECHNCLCGY 9236.55 LAB SERVICES 120621 - CALLAWAY CHEMICAL CO $7,733.00 CHEMICALS 120622 CAWS CAMERAS. INC. - $514.20 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 320623 CARLETON ENGINEERS $5.027.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES H.O.5-9-90 120624 JCH& CIRCLED ENGINEERS $189.469.88 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-20, PI-38, 1-9 120625 CENTURY SAFETY INST 8 SUPP 32.925.84 SAFETY SUPPLIES 12U626 CHESSELL CORP 0/0R 3432.47 INSTRUMENT PARTS 120627 AN CHESTERTON - LA 3503.27 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 220620 CHEVPCN LSA INC $6.671.50 OIL 6 GREASE 320629 PRIG& CHLCNUAS :EEF IKC ,A14H627.02 BEACH RUN VEHICLE 22063C LCRETTA L CCFFMAN 354.00 THOMAS GUIDE INSERTS FUND NC 9199 - JT CIST YCPMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/05/92 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CCURTT SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03/11/92 POSTING DATE 03/11/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 120631 COLICN ARE SONS $219.330.00 CONSTRUCTION I-9 126632 CCMPRESSOR COMPONENTS CF CA $638.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 120633 COMPUTER BAY 12.118.11 COMPUTER PARTS 120634 COMPUSERVE 911.39 COMPUTER SERVICES 120635 CONNELL Gk PARTS I DIV 186.92 TRUCK PARTS 120636 CONSCLICAIED ELECTRICAL LIST s9.1J1.91 ELECTRICAL PARTS 1206!7 CCKIAINE012ED CHEMICAL CISFC 1397.38 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL 12063E CONTINENTAL AIR TOCLS INC $7.573.18 SAFETY SUPPLIES 120639 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO s9.898.75 CHLORINE 120640 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 C 92,760.03 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.0.7-17-91 120641 CONVERSION SYSTEMS INC 3631.2E COMPUTER REPAIRS 120642 CCSA IRSIRUPENT CORP $292.99 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 120643 CCSTA FEIA ALTC SLPPLV $22.20 TRUCK PARTS 120645 CCUNIY VHCLESALE ELECTRIC 93.480.70 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 12C695 CROSBY C OVERTON INC. $125.663.38 EMERGENCY OIL CLEAN-UP M.O.2-19-92 120646 CURTIN MATHESON SCIENTIFIC $525.66 LAB SUPPLIES 12U697 UNIV OF CALIF REGENTS $3.154.92 HATER RESEARCH INSTITUTE PROJECT 12064P DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 12.576.O4 TIRES X 120645 PETER C CAVIC CO 151.869.70 CONSTRUCTION 3-20-2 2 120650 DE AR2A CORPCRATIOR $150.00 EQUIPMENT RENTALS W 120651 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS $104.53 LAB SUPPLIES 120652 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC 16.819.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS __4 1206!3 DUNN EONARDS CORP 1659.7.1 PAINT SUPPLIES 12065E OURO-SEAS[ CCRP 11.166.93 INSTRUMENT PARTS a 120655 EIM CO/kES SUPFLY 93.323.95 INSTRUMENT PARTS 120656 EIMCC PRCCESS EQUIP CC $3.704.60 MECHANICAL PARTS N 120657 EASTMAN INC $335.27 OFFICE SUPPLIES 126658 ECOANALYSIS INC $6.247.50 CONSULTING SERVICES 120659 DANIEL W. RLLIOTT JR., DAVID M. HERLEY, 2398.321.14 OIL WELL CON ZHNATION PAYMENT P2-05-2 120660 EPPRCS SYSTEMS IRIERRATIONAL 91.003.45 INSTRUMENT PARTS 12b661 ERCHPRTER INC 34.410.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.7-17-91 120662 ERVIPCNPEAIIL CAREERS BULLETIN $2.700.60 NOTICES 6 ADS 12U663 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC 31.O82.50 LAB SERVICES 120664 - FBI SAND AND GRAVEL INC $251.81 ROAD BASE 120665 JOHN 8 FALKENSTEIN PE $3.400.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9, 3-7-0 12066C FARR SALES A SERVICE $8.317.03 FILTERS 120ff7 FEDERAL INFRf SS CORF $76.50 AIR FREIGHT 120669 FERRELLGAS 176.55 PROPANE 120669 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURA $4.200.00 TITLE INSURANCE, CONDEMNATION 120670 FISCHER S PORTER CO 11.040.0G INSTRUMENT PARTS 120671 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO $869.60 LAB SUPPLIES 120672 FTSCRS INSTPUPEN7S 32.500.00 INSTRUMENT TRAINING 12067! FCLRIAIR VALLEY CAPERA $12.55 FILM 120674 FOR INDUSTRIAL SPLCS 1275.28 HARDWARE 120675 THE FOXBORO CO 33.832.1E CHART PAPER 120676 GST. INC. $171.21 COMPUTER PARTS FUhO KC 9199 - JT DIST WCRKIRG CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3105/92 FACE 3 REPORT NUMBER'AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03/11/92 POSTING DATE 03/11/92 WARRANT WC. VIACOM AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 12UG77 GANAHL LL116ER CO $233.20 BUILDING NATERIALS 12067E GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $5,301.34 CNBMICALS 120679 GATES FIPERGLASS INSTALLERS 9975.50 PIBERGLMB DUCTING 120660 GAUGE REFAIR SERVICE - $171.05 INSTRUMENT PART 120601 GENERAL 7ELEFHCAE CO 5305.92 TELEPHONE SERVICES 12J682 GTE CALIFCRNIA IhC $26.000.00 SLATER PUMP STATION BASEMENT 12U683 61ERLICH-MITCHELL INC 3/.932.80 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 120681 GRAHAM 6 JAMES S12.731.61 LEGAL SERV. - MONTROSE CLAIM 1206A5 GRAPhIC CISTRIBUTORS $3,979.01 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 120606 MSO TEChNCLDGY $6,390.00 CONSTRUCTION J-23-2, P2-00 120687 MR 06LY $2.175.00 TEMPORARY SERVICES 120688 MACH COMPANY 11.729.71 LAB SUPPLIES 120689 HARBOUR ENGINEERING 57036.R/ PUMP PARTS 120690 HATCH 1 MIRK INC $3,251.84 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 120691 HEWLETT PACKARD COPPANV 121.630.53 OFFICE SQUIPMBNT 120692 HCRIPA $3,2/6.57 INSTRUMENT 120693 MCRNET FCUNDATICR INC $801.38 PUBLICATION fn 12069/ J.T. HORVATH 6 ASSOC. S2.700.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, J-17 X 120695 GORRON W HOYT 22,210.97 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.0.9-12-90 2 120F96 PS HUSHES CC INC 51.868.03 PAINT SUPPLIES 120697 CITY OF FLN71NEION BEACH $355.50 WATER UBE CFO 32CO98 MUKTINGICA BEACH RUBBER STA S72.19 OFFICE SUPPLIES 120699 I.G. INDUSTRIAL CORP. $4.127./8 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 120700 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL 15/.195.72 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-10-90 a 320701 IRCUSTR U1 Th NEACED PRODUCTS $502.66 CONNECTORS 120IO2 tACRAP FFFER 12.063.11 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES W 1241L3 AT to OUR IAIA SCI[NI If IC CARP 3120.9T LAB SUPPLIES 120701 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT 547.85 WATER USE 120705 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $647.24 ADNIN./METER FEES 120706 JCNSEN 1hSYRUMENT$ CO 1687.10 SAUCE 120707 JIP.S SUSFENSION SERVICE S50.00 TRUCK REPAIRS 12076E JCHNS/Ohl SLPPLY $96.71 SLITMRIC PARTS 120709 THE KEIIH CCPPANIES $12,566.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-35, 5-36 120710 NUPE CORP 111/.91 MECHANICAL PARTS 120711 KING BEARING INC $356.75 MRCHANICAL PMTS 220712 MARTIN NCRDICK SP $3.D50.20 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 120713 LAB SAFETY SUFFLY CC $155.21 OFFICE SUPPLIES 120711' LAB SLPFCP7 $1.560.00 TEMPORARY SERVICES 120715 LAW CFFICES OF RCBERT L LAVOIE 24.214.10 LEGAL SERVICES - FLORES V. DALEY 12V716 CRC PRESS INC. S77.45 LAB SUPPLIES 120717 LIMITOROUE CORP $631.42 MECIUINICAL REPAIRS 12071R LINCCLN CAPFEI $221.12 BUILDING MATERIALS 120719 CCUNTV SAAITA71CR DISTRICT S140.000.00 JEIP PARTICIPATION M.0.2-19-92 120726 PPS 61.598.25 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 120721 NACOPCO 2372.15 SERVICE AGREEMENT 120722 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS INC $946.72 SAFETY SUPPLIES FUND NC 9199 - JT DIST WCRMINC CAPITAL PROCESSING GATE 3105/92 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CCURTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03/11/92 POSTING DATE 43111/92 WARRANT NO. VE40OR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 126723 MAKTIM $107.45 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 320724 0060Y MCGEE-S 5625.74 REFUND USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT 120725 MICRO MOTION $1,628.25 INSTRUMENT PARTS 120726 MICROAGE COMPUTER $242.44 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 12D727 MICRCSICS CORPORATION 156.70 PUBLICATION 126728 PICLAV PF[ 1 FACPINIKG s10d43.e8 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 120729 MILICN ACT CC 51.312.06 INSTRUMENT PARTS 128730 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $236.51 HARDWARE 120731 MITCMELL INSTRUMENT CO $370.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 120732 MITCMELL INTERNATIONAL INC $42.03 PUBLICATION 120733 MITCMELL FACIFIC CONSTRUC70RS 148.972.60 CONSTRUCTION 7-11-2 12L134 JAPES P PCNTCCP[RV 510.207.95 ENGINEBRING SERVICES H.O.6-13-90 12U735 NOVICK IRDUSTRIES INC $622.92 MECHANICAL PARTS 120736 MOTOROLA INC 949,159.87 RADIOS/PAGERS M.0.12-11-91 120737 NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS s42.95 PUBLICATION 120738 NATIENAL FIRE PROTECTION AS $357.75 PUBLICATIONS 120739 NA71CKAL SAFETY COLNCIL 9123.84 SAFETY FILMS FFI 120740 NCPTM StFFLV 2129.03 LAB EQUIPMENT X 120741 NORTPYEST MOTOR WELDING IRC $805.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS = 120742 OCECO. INC. $2.301.03 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES bG 120743 01 CORPORATION 61.026.25 LAB SUPPLIES 120744 OAPRIEN ENERCV SYSTEMS 53.068.68 INTERIM POWER GEN SYST. M.0.3-8-89 --4 129745 BETTY CLS(A. FND $969.50 WATER INSTITUTE RESEARCH PROJECT n 126746 ON SYSTEPS CC $21.894.34 CHLORINE M.O.10-9-91 1 12U 747 OP4N 6C YAL YC t FI TlIN6 Co. $979.95 VALVES R 120748 OSCAR�S LOCK t SA FC $104.90 KEYS 120749 OIYGEN SERVICE 5245.65 SPECIALTY GASES 120750 CCUNIT OF ORANGE 53.896.23 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES 1267!1 CCUNIT IF CRARGE 125.00 FILING FAR 120752 COUNTY SARITATICN DISTRICT 54.131.24 RBIMBURSB WORKERS COMP INSURANCE 120753 COUNTY OF ORANGE $50.00 PERMIT FEES 120754 PSI 5288.63 FITTINGS 120755 PSSI $1.750.00 VIDEO SEWER 1201'_6 PACIFIC TARTS $610.72 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1267!1 PACIFIC SAFEIV EGUIFPEKI CC 11.271.80 SAFETY SUPPLIES 120758 PACIFIC SEWER PAINTENANCE C $15.684.19 SEWER LINE MAINTENANCE DIET-S 2, 6 6 7 120759 PACIFIC BELL $675.93 TELEPHONE SERVICES 120760 FACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $486.94 TBLBPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 1207C1 FAGEKET - 554.00 PAGER RENTALS 120762 PAM WEST 5754.27 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 12C710 PALPIERI. TYLER. SICNEP• $3.513.75 LEGAL SERVICES - OIL WELLS 12064 PARAGCN CABLE $36.78 CABLE SERVICES 12Y765 PEERLESS WIPING MATERIALS C $101.25 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 120766 PERMIN-ELPEP CORFORATION 5906.72 LAB SUPPLIES 120767 PIPA SAC SYSTEPS INC $107.256.78 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5-8-91 120760 PICNEER DARK 246,159.00 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION /-/5-34-3 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WCPKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/05/92 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AF63 - CCUK7V SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03/11/92 POSTING DATE 63111/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 120769 PCLY ENTERPRISES INC 5627.10 SAFETY SUPPLIES 120770 PCLYPETRICS. IRC. $651.36 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 126711 PGLYPURE INC 110.315.88 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-67 120772 POSITIVE FORMULATORS. INC. $238.33 GROUNUBKEEPING SUPPLIES 120773 POWER TRACK INC 188.1E PUMP PARTS 120774 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE 580.50 ICE 120775 FPCFESSICRAL SERVICE IND. 12.347.OD MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 129776 THE FRO.ECT SCLUTIONS CO. 19.897.[D INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O.7-17-91 120777 PUT2MEISTER INC S1I.061.22 PUMP PARTS 120778 QUEST INTERNATIONAL INC $1,800.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 120179 RPM ELECTRIC ROTORS $2,299.90 PUMPS - 120780 AT INDUSTRIAL VIDEC 9193.69 INSTRUMSNT PARTS 120781 PAINPC6 CISFCSAL CC 11.300.17 TRASH REMOVAL 120782 RECYC INC $42.476.96 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-13-91 - 120783 PBCC CORP L REDLINE ENT $227.50 STREET SWEEPING 120789 RED WING SHOES $106.99 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 120785 THE RESISTER $1.602.05 NOTICES S ADS 120786 RELIARCE ELECTRIC $705.45 INSTRUMENT PARTS X 1207E7 RIMEEY TIPP $1,420.80 TEMPORARY SERVICES = 12080 ThE REPUELIC SUFPLY CC 22.925.30 VALVES 120769 JOSEPH T RYERSON A SON IN 9630.33 METAL 120790 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP $1,546.75 PARTS CLEANER 120791 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 11.670.94 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 120792 DOUG $A"IS 2350.O0 CPR 6 FIRST AID TRAINING n 12UT93 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT-L 1607.791.6E OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-12-91 I20794 SEA COAST DESIGNS 51.790.37 OFFICE FURNITURE 120795 SEARS ROEBUCK A CO 1304.36 LAD EQUIPMENT 120796 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1,065.29 TOOLS 120797 SHER600C ■EDICAL CC 5866.5E LAB SUPPLIES 120758 SHIVA CCRF $1.729.25 COMPUTER PARTS 12U799 SILVERI A LE BOUEF - $415.434.00 CONSTRUCTION 5-30-3 120800 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLI $280.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 120901 SLIDE MASTER $232.14 PRESENTATION AIDS 120802 SMITE-EPERY CO $971.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-17-91 12CSE3 SNAP-CN VIOLS CORP $31.16 TOOLS 12UU04 COMPUSA. INC. $641.53 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 120805 SONNENSCHEIN MATH A ROSENTH $712.50 LEGAL SERVICES - PERSONNEL 12080E. SO COAST AIR GUALT7Y 52.150.00 PERMIT FEES 120A07 SCUTh CCAST AIR QUALITY S30H82.00 PLANT I EMISSION FEES 1208CO SC CCAST AIR QUALITY 13A.Z96.29 PLANT 2 EMISSION FEES 120809 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO $281.47.57 POWER 120910 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO $19.910.U2 DIESEL/UNLEADED FUEL 126031 SOUVENIR FHOTO S1T2.09 PHOTO PROCESSING 12U012 S74R TOCL L SUPPLY CC $3,696.92 TOOLS 12GS13 STATE FARP INSURANCE 5506.08 SETTLEMENT - LIAB. CLAIM 120814 STERLING ART 533.61 ART SUPPLIES FUND NC 9199 - JT DIST REMAINS CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/05/92 PAGE A REPORT NURSER AP43 CCUKIV SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03/11/92 POSTING DATE 03/11/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 120RIS STRATAGE AF $2.453.30 COMPUTER SOFTMARE 120816 SUMMIT STEEL $369.37 METAL 120817 SUPELCO INC 91.260.49 LAB SUPPLIES 120018 SWOFFER INSTRUMENTS SL.665.70 LAR SUPPLIES 120819 TAUREA ELECTRONICS 2693.73 BATTERIES 120820 TAVLCR IKEUSIRIAL SOFTWARE $3.660.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 1208P1 TENPAR CCPFARY $530.07 LAB SUPPLIES 120822 TFA/KORCAL $150.00 LAB SERVICES 120823 CHARLES E THOMAS $2.917.66 SECURITY SYSTEM PARTS IP0024 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY S3.043.95 NECHANICAL SUPPLIES 120825 THORPE IKSULATICK $389.35 BUILDING MATERIALS 120826 TOVO LAKCSCAPING CO $3.014.37 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.11-13-91 120827 TRAVEL TRAVEL $1.342.00 TRAVEL SERVICES H.G.6-12-91 12U92S TRUCK 6 AUTC SUPPLY IKC 5205.98 TRUCK PARTS 120829 UNION BANK $5.441.40 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION - 7-11-2 120030 THE UNISOURCC CORP 9363.12 OFFICE SUPPLIES 120831 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $638.02 PARCEL SERVICES m 120832 UNITED STATES ELEVATOR CORP $327.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT X 120833 URIVERSAL ADJLSTING CO $87.00 APPRAISAL - LIAB. CLAIM = 12CO34 VWR SCIEKTIFIC 214.466.32 LAB SUPPLIED b0 120835 VALIN CORPORATION $369.61 MECHANICAL PARTS 120836 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO 550067.94 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 120837 VAN WATER L ROGERS $659.97 CMEMICALD Oa 120838 WRITER GRAPHICS $530.34 PAPER 1 12C839 VARIAK AKALYTICAL INEIRUPFRIS $101.31 LAB SUPPLIES 00V 12C84G VERTEX BUSIRESS INTERICRS $642.62 BUILDING MATERIALS 120841 VILLAGE NURSERIES $208.62 GROUNDSKEEPINI SUPPLIES 120042 WAGNER, "OHMS. INGLIS. INC $4.783.75 LEGAL SERVICES 120843 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $21.337.91 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-8-90 120R49 WESTERN IPF PANUFACTURING 5119.71 MECHANICAL PARTS 120895 WESCC S409.65 ELECTRIC PARTS 12CO46 ROURKE S VDODRUFF $116.021.92 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.10-10-90 12UP47 XEROX CORP 59.805.69 COPIER LEASES 12084A ZIENARTH AND ALPER $180.403.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-30-1 ................. TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 03/11192 53.969.189.73 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 03/05/92 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03/11/92 POSTING DATE 03/11/92 SUMMARY AMOUNT N1 OPER FUND $1,025.66 41 CAP PAC FUND $393.80 02 OPER FUND $4,479.81 42 CAP FAC FUND $1,134.95 R3 OPER FUND $8,249.48 R3 CAP FAC FUND $55,772.62 05 OPER FUND $2,546.17 R5 CAP FAC FUND $474,195.38 06 OPEN FUND $1,447.64 87 OPER FUND $20,022.78 R7 CAP FAC FUND $61,893.10 412 OPER FUND $323.18 #11 CAP FAC FUND $40,490.20 013 OPER FUND $60.00 R14 OPER FUND $43.85 m X #14 CAP FAC FUND $7,842.20 = 8687 OPER FUND $3,253.16 a7614 OPER FUND $111.83 Cd JT OPER FUND $1,746,236.13 CORP $1,291,737.25 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $94,081.50 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $148,848.97 -------------- V $3,964,189.73 FUND NC 91^9 - JI DIST NIPPING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 3118/92 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AF/3 CCUNTY SANIIAIICM DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03/25/92 POSTING DATE 03/25/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 120AE7 RG TECH CCPPAN♦ 512.066.00 GRIT REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 12GtfR AM bESI COMF.NV 991.59 PUBLICATION I2DP69 A T L / 92.719.59 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 122070 A T 6 1. 1161.09 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 12PA71 &CCU-LAPS RESEARCH INC $50.00 LAB SERVICES 129072 ACVARCE( CCCLING IECLNCLCCIES $253.05 AIR CONDITIONING REPAIRS 120813 ACVARCO CCNSTRUC/ORS INC S1.8R1.925.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-34-3, P1-35-2, J-21 120071 AIR CONDITIONING SPECIALTIES 1451.72 ELECTRIC PARTS 120975 AVER SOCIETY OF CIVIL IRGR $595.60 TRAINING REGISTRATION 120976 6MFRICAN CABLING 6 CORN 5370.05 COMMUNICATIONS SUPPLIES 120A77 APERICAR CLERICAL SOCIETY 537300 PUBLICATION 123070 APEPICAR LI-LIFT $175.65 TRUCK PARTS 32079 POLIO INC L/OR AMERICAN SEALS SS.958.3/ PUMP PARTS 120880 AMER SOCIETY FOR MICRODIOLG 1144.92 PUBLICATION 120RR1 ANAHEIM SEVER CONSTRUCTION $1.119.10 SEWER INSPECTION DIST 11 120RP2 BLAME F AAOEPSCN $14.73 CELLULAR TELEPHONE REIMBURSEMENT I208t3 ANIR/ER - EIEIRIP.LTICN $7.774.58 COMMUNICATIONS PARTS I26PB9 A-FLUS SYSTEPS $33.90 NOTICES 6 ADS 12UP85 ARC LABORATORIES $2,295.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT ITT 1208R6 ARATEN SERVICES INC 15.6RT.69 UNIFORM RENTALS X 12DROT ASSOC. POPINIS. E CORSULTANTS 5165.00 MEDICAL CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR S 12CAPR ALARCS L TPCPPICR 5366.00 PLAQUES - CO 120089 PC ANALYTICAL S5.162.00 LAB SERVICES 120P90 0C INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 5290.I8 TRUCK PARTS 120R91 PRW SAFETY C SUPPLY 533.94 SAFETY SUPPLIES to 120892 SACMFLO6 FREVEN110F OEVICE $96.00 BACKFLCl TESTING 1 12UP.9- BANARA PLLFPRINI $2.205.13 SGUEPRIMFING M.0.10-10-90 f+ ]POPS/ PARCtAYS LAt PLPLISNEPS $219.97 PUBLICATION 120855 P DAIEPAA 5600.60 BEVERAGE) COMP DISTRIBUTION 12bA96 BARTER DIAGNOSTICS INC $8.735./3 LAB SUPPLIES 129097 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $10.E13.16 LAB EQUIPMENT 12DBSB ROBERT REIR WILLIAM FROST $9.115.91 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-30 120R99 RICCYCLE $315.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 1209C0 PCLSA PAFIATCR SEPVICE $193.95 TRUCK REPAIRS 12U911 PCCI PARK 2302.92 GAYETY SHOES I209C2 NPINDEPGON CORP 1279.266.99 CONSTRUCTION J-19-2 120903 PRINDERSON CORP 16.156.00 CONSTRUCTION M-037 12090/ DRINDCPSGR CORP. $062.15 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-19-2 126905 RRITHINEE ELFCTPIC 9646.50 ELECTRIC PARTS 120906 PRCVN A CALENF.LL CONSULTING 5153.717.97 a ENGINEERING SERVICES J-I2-1, J-19 126907 AUILDER-S EMPORIUM 1551.61 HARDWARE 120900 MUSH AND ASSOCIAT(S INC 213,602.00 SURVEYING SERVCIES RES 5-051 121909 GARY 0 slRr EO 13062.13 PETTY MOM REIMSURSMENT 120910 CUTLER PPPER COPPARY 57.628.70 OFFICE SUPPLIES IP0911 C N 1 $276.13 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 120912 SUMMIT SCLLIICNSI INC 1/G9.OD TRAINING REGISTRATION FUND NC 919^ JI OIST LIRMIKG CAFIIAL PROCESSING DATE 3/19/92 VAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 C(UN1Y SANI1ATICN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03/25/12 POSTING OAT[ 03/25/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 12n913 CRC TRESS INC 5155.0". PUBLICATION 120914 CRLTACL IRE 51053.75 INSTRUMENT PARTS 120915 JOHN R CALAPRICI PHD 515.565.40 ENGINEERING SERVICES H.O.11-I4-90 1P0916 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC FINANCE 5445.U0 PUBLICATIONS 120117 CALIFORNIA MURICIPAL S115.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 120918 CENTURY SAFETY ?MST A SUFF 91.025.24 SAFETY SUPPLIES 120919 CPICASO TITLE 2800.00 TITLE REPORT - X.B. WETLANDS 12020 RIVIERA FINANCE $915.90 COMPUTER PARTS 120921 COLIC" AND SONS 515.463.15 CONSTRUCTION 7-11-163 120922 COMPRESSOR COMPCHENIS OF CA $620.64 PUMP REPAIRS 120923 CCFPUSA, INC. S493.22 COMPUTER HARDMARB/SOFTWARE 120921 CCFPLIERYC $22.49 COMPUTER SERVICES 120925 CDMSCRCO $302.76 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 123926 CONARDOS PHOTOGRAPHY $269.36 PHOTOGRAPHIC 88RVICEB 120427 CONNELL OP PARTS / DIV 1131.67 TRUCK PARTS 120920 CONSCLIEATIC ELECTRICAL LIST $4.675.86 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 120929 CCRTINERIAL AIR IO(LS INC $820.10 TOOLS 120931 CGNTIKERTAI CIQVICAL CO $6.465.00 CHLORINE H.O.10-9-91 m 120931 CONTPAC700-5 BOON STORE $3,435.60 PUBLICATION X 120132 CONTROL DATA CORPORATION 5355.90 BLECTRICAL REPAIRS 120933 COSTA PESA AUTO SLPPLV $39.83 TRUCK PARTS 120934 CCUNIY N.CLESALE ELECTRIC $327.67 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 1709!! CHARLES F CPCVLEV CC $99.05 MECHANICAL PARTS .--I IPC936 EFC CORP 5350.07 INSTRUMENT PARTS 120937 UHL INC 9833.65 VALVE PARTS W 120138 DAILY PILOT $105.00 NOTICES 6 ADS N 120939 SAVES 8 M(CPE S42.710.71 ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 91-174 120940 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE $734.21 TIRES 120941 DE CLELL[ L SCNS GLASS CC 930.71 SAFETY SUPPLIES 120142 DANNV CERTER $640.30 DEPOSITED COMP PAY-OFF 120943 DEZUPIK ANC/OR CS CO $949.55 HARDWARE 120944 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL 35.622.77 CRSMIC11L3 120945 DIFILIPPC ASSOCIATES $1.959.00 FRINTINO 124946 DIGITAL ICUTFIERI CCRP 54.140.04 COMPUTER NETWORK IMPROVEMENTS 120947 DISCO FRIRT COPPANY $209.29 OFFICE SUPPLIES 12094E JWC ENVIRONMENTAL 17.272.24 TOOL REPAIRS 12P949 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC $3.320.18 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS 1209!0 DUNN E06ARDS CCPP $1.505.28 PAINT SUPPLIES 1209!1 FIVCC PR(CESS EnUIF CC $310.32 HARDWARE 1209!2 EASTFAN IRC $6.695.69 OFFICE SUPPLIES 120953 LCCAN6LYSIS IRC $1.720.22 CONSULTING SERVICES 12G984 EL TGRITO RESTAURANTS INC $653.56 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 120955 ENCHANTER INC 54.900.00 OCEAN MONITORING N.O.7-17-90 120956 EMCELLFNCF IN TRAINIRG $209.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 1209!1 FARSVgt FAIPPES 6170.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 1209!F JCNN R FOLRENSTFIN FE 64.O89.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 1-9. PI-33 FUND NO 'I-- - JI DIST VLPMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/1R/92 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CCUhTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03/25/92 POSTING DATE 63/25/92 VIRRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 100999 FCCEPAL (%PRESS CnRf E350.15 AIR FREIGHT 120960 FERNQLGAt 125.92 PROPANE IPD961 FIRE "ASTER 31,335.73 - -SAFETY SUPPLIES 12V90 FISCHER. L POPTEP CO 22.222.07 CHLORINATION PARTS 120963 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO %p97.07 LAB SUPPLIES 12L-69 FLICRINGER CO 69U5.09 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 1209f5 Ft GREhCE FILTER COPP 569.19 ELECTRIC PARTS 1209f1 CLIFFCRC A FCRRERI S14.655,tS SURVEYING SERVICES RES 5-051 1209f7 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAIN? $1.379.20 PAINT SUPPLIES 12V968 ION ENICPPRISFS 6I.825.00 GAYETY CONSULTING 120969 FOX INDUSTRIAL SALES 13R7.39 TOOLS 12097P THE FOYBCRO CC 91.132.94 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 120971 FCPSCRO CC I FAG SYSTEPS 11.692.IP ELECTRIC PARTS 120912 FREECCP ❑AFIRG 17.929.36 PROCESSOR 129973 BUD FPLY 67-1.16 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 12P974 CITY OF FULLfRT0W 926.88 WATER USE - 120975 GET. INC. 171.70 PRINTING SUPPLIES 120976 GANAHL LLYMER CO 1146./5 MARDWARB/LUMBER FTI 120977 GATES FIBERGLASS IRSTALLFRS $2.011.00 FIBERGLASS REPAIRS X 12097P GENERAL OCCANICS. INC. 112.010.36 WATER SAMPLER = 120979 GENERAL ?ELEPNONE CO $5.711.00 TELEPHONE SERVICES by 120980 GEORGE LCECH L ASSOCIATES 1262.02 INSTRUMENT 12C9P1 GIERLICI-PIICFELI. IRC *11.709.71 MECHAICAL PARTS IPESP2 GCV•? FihthCE CFFIC.IPS ASSCC. SSR5.00 CONFSRENCE REGISTRATION Co ]p19P3 0011 GPCEN L ASSOCIATES 14.190.0P SURVEY SERVICES RES 5-051 120919 HA ONLY 9768.00 RECRUITING SERVICES BOILER PARTS 114 12G9p5 HACH C.CMFANY $387.27 1259P6 HARHCLP IRGIREEXING $10,833.02 PUMP PARTS IPG5P7 FRLO A IARFEA 11.500.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 1215R8 hAICI L PIP' ]CC F479.21 ENGINE PARTS 120989 PL HAVN CO INC 2335.64 FILTER 120990 EG MLLLER.S SON INC $714.17 TOOLS 120951 HCRI70N HIGH REACH L COUIP $226.43 TRUCE REPAIRS 120992 J.7. HORV*7H I ASSDC. 33.000.03 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, J-17 120953 HOUSE CF SA71EFTES $1,196.40 BATTERIES 120994 AS HUGHES CO INC $1,183.13 SAFETY SUPPLIES 12C995 HUNTER CORPORATION $1.323.069.10 CONSTRUCTION 3-19-1 12f956 CITY nF IUNIINGTON REACP 69.283.50 WATER USE 320997 HURTIN6I0 OFACH 'UPPER STA 1102.48 OFFICE SUPPLIES 12095A HLhT1ACICA VALLEY SCNVINA C 190.39 BICYCLE PARTS 12099 NYDRCGtX INC $2.765.05 CHBMICALS 123360 I.G. INDUSTRIAL COPP. $593.94 CHEMICALS 121401 IRPEPIAL VEST CPEMICAL F40.863.OR FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.9-13-91 121002 IROUSIR Vl I"r ACED FROCUCTS 1313.27 CONNECTORS 12100 IAGRAP FAFED 3706.58 JANIE'ORIAL SUPPLIES 121004 IhSFRUMEAI LAOCRATORY 9273.07 INSTRUMENT FUMD NC 919E - JI DIST VCPKINC CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/18197 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 CCUNIY SANITAl1CN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID :3/25/92 POSTING DAIL C3/25/92 VARPANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 121005 ISCO INC $680.98 INSTRUMENT PARTS 121006 JLO CREOII CORP 1145.32 MICROPICNE READER LEASE 121007 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP $3,062.47 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 121000 PATRICIA A. JANICULA 6131.03 LIABILITY SETTLEMENT 121009 JAYS CAIFRIkG $3RG.01 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSES 121010 JCHKSTORE SUPPLY 5119.SP ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 121011 KAHL SCIEKIIFIC INSIRUPCKIS $423.46 LAB SUPPLIES 121012 KALLEENES COMPUTER PRODUCTS 3474.99 OFFICE SUPPLIES 121033 KEENAN C ASSOCIATES $5,312.50 WORKERS' COMP ADMINISTRATIONS 121011 KEENAN SLFPLY 5797.92 TYPE 121015 KING REARING IkC /1.123.12 MACHINE SUPPLIES 221PIC MARTIK NCRCICK IN 92.914.45 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 121817 LTV PCST FROOUCTICN $566.92 PUBLICATION 121018 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO 1494.22 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 121019 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO S37.35 OFFICE SUPPLIES 121C20 LAY CFFICES OF RC?CPT L LAVOIE $2,990.94 LEGAL SERVICES - FLORES 121921 LEGI•IECM 5219.OD COMPUTER SERVICES 121R22 LIFECCM.SOFEIV SERVICE SLFPL $253.01 CYLINDER REPAIRS rrI 121D73 LIKIICROUE CCPF $1,943.51 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 121074 LOS ANGELES TIMES 5159.12 SUBSCRIPTION Z 121025 MDT BIOLOGIC COMPANY 51/9.75 MAINTENSNCE AGREEMENT 121026 MPS 9151.71 INSHTRVNRENTISUPPLIE8SS 121027 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $73.96 INSTRUMEMRIC BUPPLYLI 121028 PATI CPLCP INC $5.970.47 MECHANICAL REPAIRS ES 121779 KIDWAY PFC C IACFINIKG 31.602.69 OO 121030 MILLAR ELEVATOR SERVICE S19D.00 ELEVATOR REPAIRS 121031 " TN SALT AND/OR 9467,26 SALT t 121032 NUO GC POSE GUTHPIC ALIMANOE t12.136.60 LEGAL SERVICES - FINANCE 121033 NATICNAL SAFETY COLNCIL $130.27 SAFETY FILM RENTAL 121031 . IT II OF KC VF CRT RCA CM $16.04 WATCH USE 121035 0CCUFATICkAL VISION SERVICES 2262.70 SAFETY GLASSES 121036 ON SYSTEMS CO $11.967.29 CHLORINE M.0.20-10-91 12103T ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO 92,104.77 CNBMICALS 121030 ORANGE CCUNIY IKDUSTRIAL $3.163.80 FIBERGLASS 121039 CRANE[ VALVE A FITTIKC CC. 5257.9C FITTINGS 121090 CFCAF•S ICCV S SAFE $36.79 KEYS 121C11 OkYGIR SERVICE $1.534.76 SPECIALTY CASES 121012 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $1.921.14 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 1219.3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $11,260.40 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE 121C.19 PSI $37.33 FITTINGS 121045 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CC 21.524.58 SAFETY SUPPLIES 121P16 FACIFIC FELL /75.6P TELEPHONE SERVICES 121P*I PACIFIC LOTER CONOTITOKIKG C 568.10 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 12I018 PALMIERI. TYLER. VIEWER. 115.5T2.13 LEGAL BEEF. - BAKER/GISLER CONDEMNATION 1210w PARTS UNLIMITED 5693.17 TRUCK PARTS 1210EEM PATTIR CCRP/ TAYLOR INSIR 9I116.79 OPERATING SUPPLIES FUND NO 919Q JT 0157 WORKINC CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/18/92 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITA710N DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS FAIT 03/25/92 POSTING DATE 03/25/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 121051 PEERLESS WIPING MATERIALS C $3.375.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 121n52 RCT PERCERGPAFT $460.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 1210!! PFEIFFER L CC 1528.56 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 12I054 PIMA GRC SYSTEMS INC 1101.736.45 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 121055 FIINEY BOLES $183.18 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 121056 PLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE 2169.76 HARDWARE 1210l7 FOLYMFIRICl. INC. 1469.00 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 1210!f FCLYPUPE INC 121.251.63 CATIONIC POLYMER H.0.3-11-87 121-!9 FORICR IRCUSTRIES INC $5.07b B5 INSTRUMENT PARTS 121060 POSITIVE FORMULATORS. INC. $238.30 CHEMICALS 121561 POWER SYSTEMS CO 5292.90 ELECTRIC PARTS 121062 HAPRLD PRIMROSE ICE $42.00 ICE 121063 THE FROJFCI SCLUTIONS CC. $4.720.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O.7-17-91 121PE4 OLCSI IKIERKAIICRAL INC SI.R69.75 INSTRUMENT PARTS 121065 RECYC IRE 950.543.10 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.D.3-13-91 121U66 PACIFIC BUSINESS CAPITAL 1922.5t STREET SWEEPING 1210A7 THE REGISTER $103.30 NOTICES 6 ADS 121168 PEMAPMABLE PRODUCTS INC 1119.63 PUBLICATION 121069 REMELT TEMP $1.136.64 TEMFORY SERVICES X OSTAGE RA I21C70 REMOTE METER PESFTTING SYST 15.600.00 PLUMBING SUPPLIES S 321071 THE REPUELIC SOFTLY CC 12.037.S4 121072 POCCO•S TRUCK WRECKING 1307.75 TRUCK PARTS Ib 121073 ROYCE INSTRUMENT $45.41 INSTRUMENT PARTS 121074 P[60Y RUPF S540.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 121075 SAFETY-KtIEN CORP 51.394.50 PARTS CLEANER L'U 121076 SAACCA EACI6EIRIRG INC $15,400.00 MANHOLE REHAB. DIST 2 1 121177 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $134.41 ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR tP 12I07R SANTA It INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $615.12 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 121079 DOUG SARVIS 11,050.00 CPR 6 FIRST AID TRAINING 121APP SCIENTIFIC ELECTRONICS SFRV. $324.95 INSTRUMENT PARTS 123CFI SEA COAST CFSIGKS /139.OP OFFICE SUPPLIES 121LP2 SEAR. RCEPLCK L CC $419.16 TOOLS 121CO3 SEAVEKTURES 51.121.00 OCEAN MONITORING 121DR4 SECURITY SPECIALISTS 51.938.42. SECURITY SYSTEM PARTS 121R85 SEFERATIORS PRODUCTS 01V $50.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 12IOR6 SHAMPCCK SUPOLY $3.340.36 TOOLS 121CP7 SHCALCOC MECICAL CC 51.31 LAB SUPPLIES 121488 SFURELUCK SALES - 195.36 HARDWARE 121009 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO 5234.13 LAB SUPPLIES 1211-0 SKYPAPK VALK-IN MEDICAL CLI 11.702.00 PREEMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 121191 SLIDE MASTER 3575.96 PRESENTATION AIDS 121092 SMITH-EPERY CO 51.807.30 SOIL TESTING M.OJ-17-91 12105! SRAF•CN ICULS CCRP $29.45 TOOLS 121,194 SO COAST AIR OUAL17T $53.100.00 PERMIT FEES 121995 SOUTH COAST AIR DUALITY 3150.00 PERMIT FEES 121096 $0 CALIF COASTAL WATFP I281HB0.00 CSOOC SNARE OF SCCWRPA BUDGET 92-93 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAFI TA - PROCESSING DATE 3/19/92 FAGS F R7PORT NUMBER AP93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03/25/92 POSTING DATE 03/25/92 WARRA61 NC. VEADOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 121097 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO $351.886.92 POWER 121 P.98 $0 CAL GAS CO 118A15.97 NATURAL GAS 121099 SC CALIF WATER CO $31.61 WATER USE 121100 SCUIXEPA CCLKIIES CIL CC $8.77R.27 DIESEL FUEL 1211U1 SGUVERIA FFOTC $19.54 FILM PROCESSING 121102- SPAPKL[TTS DRINKING WATER /2.267.99 NATER 121103 SPARLING INSTRUMENT GOING 223.159.63 INSTRUMENT PARTS 121104 YESTALLGV -INC 11,016.92 METAL 121105 SPfX ILDLSTRIES INC $719.46 LAB SUPPLIES 1211LE STAR TOOL L SLFPLY CC 51.277.83 TOOLS 121IU7 STERLING APT /357.95 ART SUPPLIES 121108 STAOMBERG PRODUCTS $89.90 SERVICE AGREENEN7 121109 SUMMIT STEEL $1.931.84 METAL 121110 SUNSET FCRO $255.24 TRUCE PARTS 121111 SUPELCO IRC 91.932.70 LAB SUPPLIES 121132 TCF ASSCC1ATES $1.307.22 LAB SUPPLIES 121113 IAVLER-CURK PFG COMPANY SI.314.18 ELECTRIC CART PARTS R'I 121114 FM THOMAS AIR CONDITIONING 5965.00 AIR CONDITIONING SERVICE 121115 THOMFSGN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $609.96 - HARDWARE S 12111E TOVO LANDSCAPING CO .$720.00 CONTRACT GROUDSKEBPING M.O.11-17-91 121117 TRAVEL TRAVEL $592.11 TRAVEL SERVICES 1i1118 TRUCK A AUTC SUPPLY INC -1199.95 TRUCK PARTS 121119 UL1PA SYS If MS 5686.51 BNGINBBRINO BBRVIC88 121129 UNOCAL S47.62 UNLEADED GASOLINE Co 121321 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 2163.69 PARCEL SERVICES 1 111112 UR11[D SIATES ELEVATOR COPP S28A.R5 ELEVATOR REPAIRS 121123 UAI VfRSI71 OF CALIF IAVIAE 25.661.21 REFUND OBER FEU OVERPAYMENT 121124 VLF ICI[FIIFiC $3.471.17 LAB SUPPLIES 121125 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO $1.997.25 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 221126 VAN BAYER L ROGERS 5659.97 CHEMICALS 121127 VAUGMAN COMPANY 96.091.79 PUMPS 121129 VEPTEX SYSTEMS 56492.50 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 121129 VIOEC ARTS S1A607.73 PUBLICATION 121130 SLACB ACCCLRIIAG EFFIC[ $100.00 ANNUAL FEES 121131 WAIEFEUSE PEFPLKSFIP $937.50 MEMBERSHIP FEES 121132 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY 321,007.76 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.6-8-90 121133 UMESSOE VAREC 19.3R6.36 MECHANICAL PARTS 12113E WILLDAN ASSOCIATES $1.496,39 ENGINEERING SERVICES 121135 YILIEL COPMUNICATIONS SYS SIW.307.86 TEELPHONE EQUIPMENT 12113E RUSSELL ICIG $10.633.95 DEFERRED COMP PAY-OFF 121137 XEROX CCNP $7.399.57 COPIER LEASES 121130 21EBARTN S ALPER/C.S. ALTER 9109.374.96 CONSTRUCTION P2-02-1 121139 ZIEBARTH AND ALPER 1128.1T6.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-30-1 121140 RICHARD E ECCAR 5200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION ................. TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 03/25/92 $5.556.364.56 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/18/92 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTS CLAIMS PAID 03/25/92 POSTING DATE 03/25/92 SUMMARY AMOUNT R1 OPER FUND $7,370.90 R2 OPEN FUND $27,945.30 02 CAP PAC FUND $3,226.62 R3 OPER FUND $23,052.94 03 CAP PAC FUND $7,090.00 RS OPER FUND $5,250.45 R5 CAP PAC FUND $18,990.26 06 OPEN FUND $23.88 06 CAP FAC FUND $11.75 47 OPBR FUND $1,879.01 41 CAP FAC FUND $20,933.34 All OPER FUND $6,390.79 411 CAP PAC FUND 123.42 R14 CAP FAC FUND $12,120.63 R566 OPEN FUND $1,228.23 R566 CAP FAC FUND $103.04 X07619 OPER FUND 17,595.26 = JT OPER FUND $811,659.40 CORF $4,040,557.24 W SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $26,160.87 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $532,599.23 -------------- b0 $5,556,369 56 V RE; AGENDA ITEM NO. 28 - DISTRICTS 6, 7 & 14 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS "1 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA April 21, 1992 IOBCC ELLIS AVENUE PO 8OX 8127 FWNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 Om882-2.11 STAFF SUMMARY RE FINAL SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 TO EIR FOR THE BAKER-GISLER INTERCEPTOR, CONTRACT NO. 14-1-1A Since the formation in 1986 of County Sanitation District No. 14, Sanitation Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14 have been working toward the completion of a joint, backbone sewage conveyance system which will deliver wastewater from the communities of Irvine, Tustin, Costa Mesa and Santa Ana to the Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant. Portions of the line have been completed and other portions are under construction. As part of this project, the Districts have tried to acquire necessary easements through private property westerly of Harbor Boulevard (the Magna easement) and through a portion of the Mesa Verde Golf Course adjacent to Gisler Avenue. On July 11, 1990, the Boards of Directors of Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14 certified Supplement No. 1 to two previous EIRs, prepared in 1983 and 1985, all of which analyzed the environmental impacts of the Baker-Gisler sewer line project. Preparation of Supplement No. 1 was necessitated by changes in the proposed alignment and sizing of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor which occurred following preparation of the original EIRs. Following certification of Supplement No. 1, Mesa Verde Country Club (Mesa Verde) filed a lawsuit under the California Environmental Quality Act challenging, on a wide variety of grounds, the Districts' certification of Supplement No. 1. Mesa Verde's principal objection was the construction of an above-ground portion of the sewer line along the edge of the "rough" on the sixth hole of the golf course adjacent to Gisler Avenue. Mesa Verde also contended that a maintenance road used by Mesa Verde's maintenance staff for access to Gisler Avenue could be temporarily affected by the construction project and that the above-ground portion of the sewer line could permanently eliminate other potentially usable points of access to Gisler Avenue. Following a court hearing on Mesa Verde's suit, the Orange County Superior Court rejected most, but not all , of Mesa Verde's claims. The court found that Supplement No. 1 did not adequately address the impacts of the sewer line on Mesa Verde's access to Gisler Avenue. The court also found that the Monitoring and Reporting Program previously adopted for construction projects contained in the Master Facilities Plan was not specifically tailored for this project and, therefore, the Districts should have adopted a Monitoring and Reporting Program specifically geared to the Baker-Gisler Interceptor sewer line. In order to facilitate completion of the sewer line project to light of the court ruling, the staff circulated a Notice of Preparation of Supplement No. 2. Ultrasystems Environmental Services, the Districts' environmental consultant, prepared and staff circulated Draft Supplement No. 2 which addresses the issues determined inadequate by the Court. The Districts requested and received approval from the State Clearinghouse for a 30-day comment period which ended on April 16, 1992. Supplement No. 2 addresses the steps which the Districts will take to provide Mesa Verde with access to Gisler Avenue during the construction of the sewer pipeline, i .e. , a temporary access road will be provided to Mesa Verde during the construction so that Mesa Verde will have continuous access to Gisler Avenue. In addition, the EIR addresses the potential long-term impacts of the above-ground portion of the sewer line on Mesa Verde' s access to Gisler Avenue. Finally, under separate document, a Mitigation Monitoring Program has been prepared. At the Public Hearing held on April 8, 1992, Mr. C. L. Friedersdorf, President of Mesa Verde Country Club and Golf Course addressed the Boards. Mr. Friedersdorf expressed his concerns about the club's property being returned to the same condition as before the sewer line is installed, the safety of and potential for odors from the line, and access to Gisler Avenue while construction takes place and if the proposed Santa Ana River bridge at Gisler is built. The Draft Supplement No. 2 to the EIR addresses these concerns. Written comments received to date that are also addressed in Draft Supplement No. 2, follow: March 30, 1992 from State of California, Department of Transportation, stating that it has no comments at this time. April 9, 1992 from City of Costa Mesa, Development Services Department, no comments except to offer an update on the 1990 General Plan which includes a revised Master Plan of Highways. The MPH retains the Gisler Avenue bridge over the Santa Ana River to be consistent with Orange County's MPH; however the City has commissioned a cooperative study which will delete the Gisler Avenue bridge from the MPH, and the bridge will not be included as a mitigation measure on future development projects. April 16, 1992 from State of California, Governor's Office of Planning and Research stating that none of the state agencies had comments. Enclosed are copies of the Supplement No. 2 Final Environmental Impact Report and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. ENG/D14/1-1A STFSUM1.1,1.2 (2 of 2) P RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 28 - DISTRICTS 6, 7 & 14 t RESOLUTION NO. 92-57 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 6, 7 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA CERTIFYING FINAL SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 AND FINAL SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR PROPOSED FORMATION OF DISTRICT NO. 14 AND PROPOSED REORGANIZATION NO. 79 INVOLVING REORGANIZATION OF DISTRICTS NOS. 7 AND 13 RE BAKER-GISLER INTERCEPTOR, CONTRACTS NOS. 14-1-1A AND 14-1- 1B, AND BAKER FORCE MAINS, CONTRACT NO. 14-1- 2, MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT AND .APPROVING THE PROJECT WHEREAS, by adoption of Resolution No. 85-130 on July 24, 1985, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, received and approved the Environmental .� Impact Report on the Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13 (111985 EIR") ; and WHEREAS, the 1985 EIR approved by Resolution No. 85-130 included the construction of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor and Baker Force Mains ("Project") as projects covered by the 1985 EIR but offered alternatives and not specifics regarding pipe size and final alignment; and WHEREAS, in December of 1986, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14 of Orange County, California, authorized the preparation of a Project Report on the Master-Planned Joint Sewage Conveyance Facilities to Serve Future Flows of Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14; and -1- WHEREAS, as a result of the Project Report, a specific alignment for the Baker-Gisler Interceptor was recommended; and / WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts No. 6, 7 and 14 of Orange County, California (DISTRICTS) , have previously commissioned Ultrasystems, Inc. to prepare a Supplement No. 1 and a Supplement No. 2 to Environmental Impact Report for Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13 re Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Contract Nos. 14-1-1A and 14-1-1B, and Baker Force Mains, Contract No. 14-1-2 to identify and analyze the impacts of construction of these sewage conveyance facilities and changes identified since the original Environmental Impact Report of 1985, (the "PROJECT") ; and WHEREAS, DISTRICTS is the lead agency for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for projects contained within said Supplement, as defined in the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended (hereinafter "CEQA") and the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of CEQA as modified and adopted by the DISTRICTS (hereinafter "CEQA Guidelines") ; and WHEREAS, in order to facilitate an objective assessment of the additional individual and collective environmental impacts associated with the changes since the July 1985 approval of the EIR, DISTRICTS have caused to be prepared a Draft Supplement No. 1 and a Draft Supplement No. 2 to Environmental Impact Report for Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of -2 Districts Nos. 7 and 13 (hereinafter referred to as "DRAFT SUPPLEMENT EIRS) to address the significant, adverse environmental impacts, mitigation measures and Project alternatives associated with the Project; and WHEREAS, the DISTRICTS have consulted with other public agencies and the general public and given them the opportunity to comment on said DRAFT SUPPLEMENT EIRS as required by the provisions of CEQA and CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, on March 14, 1990, a duly-noticed public hearing was held by the Boards of Directors of the DISTRICTS to provide a further opportunity for the general public to comment on and respond to the DRAFT SUPPLEMENT NO. 1; and WHEREAS, on April 8, 1992, a duly-noticed public hearing was held by the Boards of Directors of the DISTRICTS to provide a further opportunity for the general public to comment on and respond to the DRAFT SUPPLEMENT NO. 2, and: WHEREAS, the DISTRICTS have evaluated the comments received from public agencies and persons who reviewed the DRAFT SUPPLEMENT EIRS; and WHEREAS, said comments and recommendations received on the DRAFT SUPPLEMENT EIRS, either verbatim or in summary, a list of persons, organizations and public agencies commenting on the DRAFT SUPPLEMENT EIRS, and the responses of the DISTRICTS to significant environmental points raised in the review and consultation process have been included in and made a part of said DRAFT SUPPLEMENT EIRS to form the FINAL SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 and FINAL SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 to �� -3- r Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13 (hereinafter referred to as "FINAL SUPPLEMENT EIRS") for said Project as required by Section 15132 of the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, said FINAL SUPPLEMENT EIRS have been presented to the Boards of Directors of DISTRICT for review, consideration and approval prior to the final approval of, and commitment to, undertaking the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Contract Nol 14-1-1A, and Baker Force Mains, Contract No. 14-1-2. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14 of Orange County, California as follows: 1. That the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation "- Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14 of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the FINAL SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 and FINAL SUPPLEMENT NO.2 have been completed in compliance with the CEQA and CEQA Guidelines, and that the DISTRICTS have reviewed and considered the information contained in said FINAL SUPPLEMENT EIRS prior to approval of, or commitment to, the Project. Said FINAL SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 is composed of the following elements: A. A Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, "Draft Supplement No. 1 to the Final Environmental Impact Report on Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13 re Baker-Gisler interceptor, Contract Nos. -4- �/ 1 14-1-1A and 14-1-1B, and Baker Force Mains, Contract No. 14-1-21- , and all appendices thereto; B. Comments and responses to said DRAFT SUPPLEMENT EIR. Said FINAL SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 is composed of the following elements: A. A Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, "Draft Supplement No. 2 to the Final Environmental Impact Report on Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13 re Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Contract Nos. 14-1-1A and 14-1-iB, and Baker Force Mains, Contract No. 14-1-211, and all appendices thereto; B. Comments and responses to said DRAFT SUPPLEMENT EIR. 2 . That :he Boards of Directors of DISTRICTS do hereby find `i that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which will mitigate or avoid any significant adverse effects identified in the FINAL SUPPLEMENT EIRS as specifically itemized below: A. Earth Impacts: Pipeline construction will result in grading, excavation and compaction of soil and temporary disruption to street and parking and recreation facilities along the pipeline route. Excavation and r construction activities may result in some erosion and siltation into adjacent streams and storm drains. Findinos: Work will be conducted in accordance with -5- applicable city, county, state and Districts' . requirements. The ground or streets will be restored to preconstruction or better condition. Erosion will be controlled by provision in the contract documents. B. Hydrology Im acts: The project route crosses the Santa Ana-Delhi Channel, Airport Storm Channel, Greenville-Banning Channel, Santa Ana River, which are under the jurisdiction of the County of Orange and/or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Findings: The impact of the proposed Project on the flood control channels is limited to the construction period. Upon construction completion the channels will return to their normal operating capacities and means. All work will be in accordance with applicable permit provisions �...✓ including allowances for the proposed improvements to the Santa Ana River. C. Biota Impacts: The majority of the proposed sewer line route will be located in public roadway. There is one section of the proposed pipeline that will be located along the northern boundary of the Mesa Verde Country Club; this portion will affect approximately 30 trees and/or larger shrubs. Findings: Trees and shrubs will be replaced or replanted on a 1:1 basis unless other arrangements are made with -6 1 the property owner when the easement is acquired. D. Noise Impacts: Project implementation will generate short-term noise levels from alignment construction activities and long-term noise levels from future sewer maintenance repair activities. Findings: Work hours and equipment mufflers will meet applicable noise ordinances. E. Land Use Impacts: Project excavation and construction activities will cause minor disruptions to residential, small businesses and airport facilities that are proximal to the pipeline route. The pipeline will require an easement from the Mesa Verde Country Club and in an existing parking lot for an office building located at 1520 Nutmeg Place. Findings: Access will be maintained by at least one ingress/egress point at all times for each property and two points for the Mesa Verde Country Club. The portion of the pipeline proposed through the John Wayne parking lot, under the freeway and in Airport Loop and Airway Avenue will cause minor disruption to small commercial and industrial uses through the partial closure of Airway Avenue. Emergency access will be maintained during construction. -7 F. Transportation and Circulation ' . impacts: Traffic congestion, particularly during the peak hours, can be expected on that stretch of roadway being impacted by construction activities. The major intersections, i.e. , Baker/Harbor, Baker/Fairview, Baker/Bristol, and Baker/Redhill, are particularly susceptible to traffic congestion. Construction activities in the parking lot between Deodar Avenue and Cinnamon Avenue may temporarily disrupt businesses located on that site. Construction activities along Airway Avenue may temporarily limit vehicle access to the MillionAir Fixed-Base Operations, Crash/Fire Rescue Station No. 33 and the Martin Aviation Hangar. Construction in the North Parking Lot of John Wayne Airport may also temporarily disrupt airport patrons. Construction activities associated with the proposed Project may temporarily impact public bus services to residents and businesses in the area. Bus stops may be blocked and bus routes displaced temporarily during construction. Construction activities will occur in school zones on Gisler Avenue at Gibraltar Avenue and on Baker Street at Babb Street. These construction activities could interfere with the normal flow of children to and from school and potentially create hazardous situations. Construction of the Project will require an encroachment permit to tunnel under the San _g_ ' Diego Freeway between Airport Loop Road and the airport parking lot. Findings: All construction will require traffic detour plans approved by applicable local agencies. Tunnels will be used under major intersections to minimize congestion. Adequate signage will alert motorists of the construction. These requirements will be included within the contract documents. G. Recreation Impacts: Implementation of the proposed Project will require a permanent easement area of approximately 1/2- acre through the Mesa Verde Country Club Golf Course. Findings: Construction within the golf course will be limited to temporary and permanent easement areas. A temporary fence will separate the construction area from the active golf course. H. Utilities Impacts: Excavation activities may potentially disrupt electrical, natural gas, water, sewer and telephone lines located along the pipeline route. Findings: All utilities will be maintained to all properties. Temporary connections will be made when necessary. I. Health and Safety Impacts: Portions of the proposed pipeline alignment are located near schools which may create hazardous -9- situations for children at crosswalks and along school _ routes. The open trench, parked machinery and stockpiled dirt may appear to be an attractive play area to children able to reach the construction site. During limited periods when tie-ins with existing facilities occur or when operations nuisances commence odor and noise may occur. Findings: Trenches will be fenced or plated during all off hours. Work near schools will be scheduling during vacation periods, to the extent possible. J. Aesthetics Impacts: Short-term visual impacts from machinery, trenching, and dirt pilings will occur along each segment of the proposed alignment during construction. Findings: The construction contract will require that the construction areas be kept neat and clean and dust be kept to a minimum. K. Economic Factors Impacts: Districts' funds are available to complete the Projects. Additional revenue-raising actions may be required in the future. Additional jobs will be created through the design, construction and the administration of the contracts. Higher sewer use and connection fees are anticipated. Findings: All new construction is paid for by the collection of fees from developers. -10- L. Growth-Inducing Impacts of the Proposed Project Impacts: Improvement and expansion of the sewer conveyance system is designed to accommodate projected growth based on land use plans of the various areas within the service area. Findings: Implementation of the proposed Project will not in and of itself promote additional growth to the service areas. M. Access of Mesa Verde Country Club to Gisler Avenue Impacts: Installation of the sewer line will have a temporary minor impact on access to Mesa Verde Country Club to and from Gisler Avenue during the period when the sewer line is installed under the club's presently existing maintenance road which connects to Gisler Avenue. The regular access will be blocked for a maximum of five days, during which a temporary unpaved access road, just west of the existing maintenance, will be provided by the DISTRICTS to maintain access to Gisler Avenue at all times. If and when the County of orange constructs the proposed Garfield-Gisler Bridge over the Santa Ana River, the existing access road may be maintained by raising the existing maintenance road approximately three feet in the vicinity immediately adjacent to Gisler Avenue. This potential effect, as mitigated, will not result in a significant environmental impact. `J -11- i 2. That the Boards of Directors of Districts further find that changes, alterations or conditions have been incorporated into the Project contemplated in FINAL SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 and FINAL SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 which will substantially mitigate or avoid the significant effects identified in the Draft Supplement No. 1 and Draft Supplement No. 2. That certain significant effects cannot be fully mitigated. That the short-term impacts, including land use changes, traffic control, construction noise, visual impacts from construction, may continue to be significant after all feasibly known and identified mitigation measures are implemented. That the 1985 EIR discusses these impacts and that the impacts are addressed further within FINAL SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 and FINAL SUPPLEMENT NO. 2. 3. That certain changes or alterations (e.g. , mitigation measures) , are required, and are incorporated into the Project through the permitting responsibility and jurisdiction of a public agency other than the County Sanitation Districts. That these changes, identified in the 1985 EIR, are not changed by FINAL SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 or the FINAL SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 . 4 . That the Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14 of Orange County, California, have balanced the benefits of the proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the Project. The Boards do hereby further find, determine and state, pursuant to the provisions of Section 15093 of the State Guidelines, that the occurrence of those certain significant environmental effects identified in the 1985 EIR, FINAL SUPPLEMENT i -12 NO. 1 and FINAL SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 and as set forth in the paragraphs �../ above, have been found acceptable and will be permitted without further mitigation due to the following overriding considerations. A. The Project is necessary to accommodate wastewater flows from ongoing and future development approved by the local land use authorities. The Districts is a single-purpose agency with the responsibility to collect, treat and dispose of wastewater generated within the Districts' service area. Construction of the Project identified in FINAL SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 and FINAL SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 is necessary to provide sewerage conveyance facilities to serve.development approved by the cities and county after separate environmental review by the approving entity as identified in local land use plans. B. The Boards of Directors find that implementation of the \� Project alternatives identified in FINAL SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 and FINAL SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 are infeasible as follows: 1. No-Project Alternative. The Districts' sole function is to provide sewerage facilities to adequately collect, treat and dispose of wastewater. If a no- project alternative is implemented and no new facilities are built to accommodate city and county approved land uses, the sewer system will become unreliable with potential raw sewage backup in the streets and other urban areas and discharge untreated wastewater to the ocean. The no-project alternative addressed in FINAL SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 and FINAL SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 would result `� -13- in construction of the sewer as originally designated in the 1985 FIR which is of a size and alignment which would result in reduced capacity to convey ever-increasing flows as well as serious impacts on traffic on more heavily-traveled arterials than originally noted in 1985. 2. Provision for Lesser/Greater Capacity. Installation of smaller pipes than identified would not meet planned land use development and redevelopment of , the cities and county, thus limiting growth or necessitating construction of additional pipelines at a higher cost in the near future. Installation of pipelines larger than those identified in the FINAL SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 and FINAL SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 is not warranted at this time. The Districts' responsibility is to serve anticipated growth, as determined by the local municipalities, not to act as the vehicle by which growth is induced or restricted. 3. Alternative Pipeline Route. various underground and above-ground alternatives were considered before the above-ground alternative across the golf course was chosen. In order to place the sewer line underground across the golf course or under Gisler Avenue, it would have been necessary to either construct a longer siphon, which would have caused maintenance problems, or to construct a pump station which would have resulted in reduced reliability and increased costs. -14- The basis for establishing the profile of the Baker- Gisler Interceptor is the hydraulic control which sets the downstream elevation of the pipeline. This point is the elevation of the headworks in the treatment plant in Fountain Valley. From this point, the pipeline profile is extended upstream at a minimum pipe size and slope combination to carry the design flow. A siphon will be required beneath the Santa Ana River and the Greenville- Banning Flood Control Channel regardless of the alignment selected because of their elevations. If a siphon is kept to less than 600 feet in length and designed properly, the Districts can maintain the siphon with relatively high reliability. The solids that may collect can be removed routinely, minimizing the probability of N%W" a blockage. A siphon can only be maintained at this location for less than 600 feet if the sewer line is kept at an elevation above the existing ground level. This means that if the alignment is across the golf course, a portion of the pipeline will have to be above the existing ground level at the golf course. Similarly, if the alignment is to be down Gisler Avenue, a portion of the pipeline will have to be above the existing level of Gisler in order to maintain a siphon that is less than 600 feet. Three alternative alignments were addressed in the Project Report: (1) an alignment following Washington `J -15- a Avenue and California Street; (2) an alignment following Washington Avenue, Illinois Street and Indiana Avenue; and (3) an alignment continuing in Gisler Avenue and through the Mesa Verde Country Club golf course as recommended. The first alignment would be very shallow, create a tremendous burden on the surrounding residential community during construction, and would be very expensive due to the encumbrance of existing utilities along the route. Many service connections to several of the utilities would require relocation and most likely additional utility mains would be required within the street due to the shallow depth of this large trunk sewer pipe. The environmental effects would be extreme traffic congestion and disruption of access to residences during �..� construction. The second alignment similarly results in a very shallow depth, requires a siphon beneath the Greenville- Banning Channel that is too long for the Districts to maintain and would be very disruptive to the surrounding residential community. The environmental effects would be similar to the first alignment in disruption of residence during construction. The third alternative, that through the golf course, involves the least disruption to residences during construction, and would result in practically no -16- i permanent environmental change. There are additional y costs involved in purchasing the necessary construction and permanent easements. After the Project is completed under this alternative, the only change would be a sloped area on the rough of one fairway of the golf course as opposed to the present flat area on the rough. Environmentally, this is the least disruptive of all of the alternatives considered. A variation of the third alternative in which the pipeline would be placed along Gisler Avenue presents several unsatisfactory results. Gisler Avenue just west of Washington Avenue falls below the elevation of the interceptor pipe. This requires the siphon beneath the Greenville-Banning Channel to be extended to a total ti length of approximately 1,600 feet. The Districts are currently unable to clean this length of siphon with current technology. Further, to be compatible with the current planning for the proposed bridge over the Santa Ana River at Gisler Avenue, the pipeline must be below the existing Gisler Avenue elevation at Vermont Avenue. This means that the Districts would have a very unserviceable siphon if the gravity line is to be used and the pipe is to be placed in or along Gisler Avenue. Another alternative to an all-gravity system would be to construct a pump station at some point west of the Gisler Avenue and Washington Avenue intersection. A pump -17- station, however, has many disadvantages to an all F gravity flow system. It's life cycle costs are significantly greater than those of the all-gravity system, requires continual operation and maintenance attention, would significantly affect the reliability of the overall system in that there are many additional possibilities for malfunctions, requires a significant structure which would be much more damaging to the aesthetics of the neighborhood than the landscaped and covered box across the rough of the golf course presently being considered. After considering all of these alternatives, the route proposed in FINAL SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 and FINAL • SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 is the least damaging environmentally. The proposed route will enter the golf course near Vermont Avenue. A portion of the rough area of one fairway will be regraded and landscaped. The interceptor design can continue as a gravity flow system throughout this area with a siphon that is capable of being maintained by the Districts, resulting in increased reliability. A box conduit was selected to lessen the vertical height of the facility and to provide for a line that will appear to be completely underground after the regrading and relocation of the existing trees on the easement area. During construction, this alignment will provide the least disruption to neighbors and the golf course. After construction, it will provide the least disruption to the beauty of the golf course and the neighborhood. C. For the reasons set forth above, it is not economically feasible to further mitigate or avoid the environmental effects hereinabove identified. 5. That a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Baker-Gisler Interceptor has been duly prepared in accordance with Public Resources Control Section 21081.6 to ensure the Project's mitigation measures and implemented in accordance herewith. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is hereby approved and adopted. 6. That the Project as modified in Supplement No. 1 and Supplement No. 2 is hereby approved. 7. That Resolution No. 90-86, adopted July 11, 1990, by which the Districts previously certified Supplement No. 1 is hereby rescinded. PASSED AND ADOPTED AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD MAY 13, 1992. cszmz��� y� -19- 9�- MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE BAKER-GISLER INTERCEPTOR APRIL 1992 �ZTATION d avolit" O e rS � m a Stnce 106A ,t`� 'INGE C60 r MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE BAKER-GISLER INTERCEPTOR - APRIL 1992 r p.,,vrrATIo v eaor°uem 0 U r G,� 3fhce 19� 9NGE Co�� r r r MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE BAKER-GISLER INTERCEPTOR AND BAKER FORCE MAINS DRAFT SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 TO THE FINAL EIR' I. OVERVIEW This mitigation monitoring program was prepared in compliance with Public Resources Code section 21081.6 (AB 3180 of 1988). It describes the requirements and procedures to be followed by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County(Districts) to ensure that all mitigation measures adopted as part of this project will be carried out. Attachment 1 summarizes the adopted mitigation measures, implementing actions, and verification procedures for this project. .. Pursuant to Resolution 89-102, the Districts have appointed an Environmental Monitor responsible for reviewing, in conjunction with the Districts' Director of Engineering, the Districts' compliance with construction project mitigation measures. This Environmental Monitor will perform these functions for purposes of this Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program H. MITIGATION MONITORING PROCEDURES Mitigation measures can be implemented in three ways: (1) through project redesign, which is verified by plan check and inspection; (2) through compliance with various codes, ordinances, policies, standards, and conditions of approval which are satisfied prior to or during construction and verified by plan check and/or inspection; and (3) through monitoring and reporting during and after construction is completed. Compliance monitoring procedures for these three types of mitigation r measures are summarized below: .d 'This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is prepared jointly for implementation with both Supplement No. 1 to the Environmental Impact Report for Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 involving Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13 and Regarding Baker-Gisler Interceptors and Baker Force Mains ("Supplement No. 1") and Supplement No. 2 to the Environmental Impact Report for Proposed .. Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 involving Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13 and Regarding Baker- Gisler Interceptors and Baker Force Mains ("Supplement No. 2"). 1 ,r (A) Mitigation measure implemented through project redesignp Upon project approval, a copy of the approved project design will be placed in the official project file and initial study or EIR file. As part of the review process for all subsequent discretionary or ministerial permits, the file will be checked by the Districts' Environmental .. Monitor to verify that the requested permit is in conformance with the approved project design. Weekly field inspections during concoction by the Districts' Environmental Monitor will be made to verify that all construction activities conform to approved plans, and comply with the mitigation measures specified in the Supplement No. 1 and Supplement No. 2. During construction, the Districts' .y Environmental Monitor will provide monthly reports to the Districts' Boards of Directors regarding compliance with the mitigation measures. The Boards of Directors will,as appropriate,approve each report, request additional information or pursue enforcement remedies in the event of noncompliance. Final monitoring reports will be placed in the offical EIR file. (B) Mitigation measures implemented through compliance with codes. ordinances. policies. standards. or conditions of approvaL Upon project approval, a copy of the approved project description and conditions of approval will be placed in the official project file and initial study or EIR file. As part of the review process for all subsequent discretionary or ministerial permits, the file will be .. checked by the Districts' Environmental Monitor to verify that the requested permit is in compliance with all applicable codes, ordinances, policies, standards, and conditions of approval. Field inspections will be made by the Districts' Environmental Monitor to verify that all construction activities conform to all applicable standards and conditions. The Districts' Environmental Monitor will ,r provide monthly reports to the Districts' Boards of Directors regarding compliance with the mitigation measures. Tle Boards of Directors will,as appropriate, approve each report,request additional information or pursue enforcement remedies in the event of noncompliance. Final monitoring reports will be placed in the offical EIR file. r (C) Mitigation measures implemented through post-construction monitoring: r The Districts' Environmental Monitor will, on a quarterly basis, monitor those mitigation measures which continue in effect following completion of project construction. A log of the monitoring performed will be maintained. Reports of compliance with these mitigation measures will be provided to the Districts' Boards of r 2 r r Directors on a quarterly basis. The Boards of Directors will, as appropriate, approve eacb report, request additional information, or pursue enforcement remedies in the event of noncompliance. Final r monitoring reports will be placed in the official EIR file. r r r r ar r it YI Yd W 3 r SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING MILESTONES Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Milestone Measure No. Measure (Trigger for Enforcement) 1-1 Excavation for pipelines Grading Permit d 1-2 600 Feet limuation Grading Activities 1.3 Detours in Irvine Grading Permit 1.4 Baddiill after pipe is installed Grading Aalvltles 1-5 Street pavement removal Grading Activities "tl 1-6 Temporary paving Grading Activities 1-7 Geologic studies Grading Permit 1-8 Water disposal from excavation Grading Activities ,r 2-1 Crossing flood control facilities Encroachment Permit 2-2 US.Army Corps of Engineers Encroachment Permit 3.1 Tree replacement Grading Activities 4-1 Construction equipment storage Grading Activities 4.2 Construction equipment noise Grading Activities 4-3 Construction operating hours Construction Activities 5-1 Private property access Construction Activities 5-2 Easements Construction Activities 6-1 Gisler,Washington to Gbralter Construction Activities 6-2 Gibraltar, Gisler to Sumatra Construction Activities ,r 6.3 Baker Street,general Construction Activities 64 Baker, Labrador to College Construction Activities 6-5 Baker, College to Loren Construction Activities 6.6 Baker,Loren to Coolidge Construction Activities 6-7 Baker, Coolidge to Babb Construction Activities 6-8 Baker,Babb to Corona Del Mar Freeway Construction Activities 6-9 Baker, Bristol to Red Hill Construction Activities 6-10 Airway Avenue -Airport Loop Drive Construction Activities 6.11 Fairview, Baker to Paularino Construction Activities 6-12 Fairview, Paulrion to Fair Construction Activities 6-13 Citys hourly traffic counts Construction Activities 6-14 Construction signing Construction Activities 6-15 Construction signs Construction Activities 6-16 Traffic contingency plan Grading Permit 6-17 Notice to affected property owners Grading Permit 6-18 Traffic control plan Grading Permit 6-19 Construction in parking lots Grading Permit 6.20 Replacement parking Grading Pcrmit 6-21 Access along Airway Avenue Grading Permit 6-22 Construction parking Grading Permit 6-23 OCLT) Notice Grading Permit 6-24 School aoss4 guard Grading Permit 6-25 Caltrans Encroachment Permit 6-26 Airport operations & facilities Construction Activities 6.27 Access to John Wayne Airport Construction Activities 6-28 Temporary Access to Country Club Grading Permit 6-29 Signs posted for temporary access Grading Permit 6-30 Flagman Grading Permit 6-31 Country Club property completion Grading Permit 7-1 Country Club Easement Grading Permit 4 m SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURES W AND MONITORING MILESTONES (Continued) Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Milestone ar Measure No. Measure (Trigger for Enforcement) 8-1 Electrical underground Grading Permit 8-2 Electrical service interruption Grading Permit 9-1 Natural gas lines protection Grading Permit 9-2 Natural gas lines relocation Grading Permit 10-1 Existing water lines protection Grading Permit 10-2 Water lines relocation Grading Permit 11-1 Sewer lines protection Grading Permit 11-2 CMSD notice Grading Permit 12-1 Telephone lines protection Grading Permit 12-2 Pacific Bell review of construction plans Grading Permit 131 School crossing guard Grading Pcrmit 13-2 School schedule interruption Grading Permit 13-3 Summer construction near schools Grading Permit 13-4 Signs, lights and flagmen Grading Permit 135 Comply with laws and regulations Grading Permit 136 Construction signs for traffic Grading Permit 13-7 Illuminated signs Grading Permit 138 Signing, barracad'mg and traffic approval Grading Permit 13-9 Construction fencing Grading Activities 1310 Construction fencing Grading Activities 1311 Restricting public access Construction Activities 13-12 Security Construction Activities 1313 Security Construction Activities 1314 Public safety Construction Activities 13.15 Odors Tie-in Activities a, 14-1 landscaping Grading Permit 14-2 Excess earth Grading Activities 14-3 Sewer line aesthetics Grading Activities ( [ [ [ I ( [ I ( I I I I ( ( I ( ( ATTACHMENT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM SUMMARY BAKER-GISLER INTERCEPTOR AND BAKER FORCE MAINS DRAFT SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 TO THE FINAL EIR Implementing Action/Condition or Method of Timing of Responsible Mitigation Measure Mechanism Verification Verification Agency Earth 1-1 Excavation for the pipelines The County Sanitation Districts of Plan Receipt & Prior to The County will be accomplished by open Orange County receives the plans. Field Inspection construction Sanitation trench except in those specific Districts of areas where tunneling or jacking Orange County is called out on the plans. The specifications will require that all excavations be performed, protected, and supported as required for safety and in a manner set forth in the operation rules, orders, and regulations prescribed by the CAL/OSHA Construction Safety Orders. For all boring, jacking pits, or open excavations which are 5 feet or deeper, the contractor will be required to obtain a permit from the applicable agency as required by California Labor Code 6424. Also, for all trenches 5 feet or more in depth, the contractor will be required to prepare and submit to the District a detailed plan showing the design of shoring, bracing, and sloping or other provisions to be made for worker protection as required by California Labor Code 6422. 6 e e e I a e a a a a a e a e e e e x a ATTACHMENT I (Continued) Implementing Action/Condition or Method of Timing of Responsible gation Measure Mechanism Verification Verification Agency The project geolechnicalinvesti- gation will include soils-related design criteria for use in prepara- tion of and/or reviewing the plan. This will include such information as safe construction slopes, lateral earth pressures for sheeting and shoring design, and the effects of . adjacent surcharge loads. 1-2 Excavation of an open trench The Districts' engineer verifies that Field Inspection During grading The County will be limited to 600 feet or a excavation of an open trench is activities on-site Sanitation distance necessary to accommo- limited to 600 feet or a distance Districts of date pipe installation in a single necessary to accommodate pipe Orange County day. This distance will be col- installation in a single day; that lective in length and will include grading and stockpiling of open excavation for pipeline and excavated material is done in a appurtenances and backfilling manner to prevent water from which has not been temporarily running into excavations; that resurfaced. The contractor will be obstructions of surface drainage is required to control grading and avoided and that means are stockpiling of excavated material provided for storm waters or in a manner to prevent water surface drains to maintain their from running into excavations. uninterrupted service; and that free Obstructions of surface drainage access is provided to all fire will be avoided and means pro- hydrants, water meters, and private vided for storm waters or surface drives during the course of drains to maintain uninterrupted construction. service. Free access will be pro- vided to all fire hydrants, water meters, and private drives during the course of construction. 7 ATTACHMENT 1 (Continued) Implementing Action/Condition or Method of Timing of Responsible Mitigation Measure Mechanism Verification Verification Agency 1-3 The specifications will The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection During grading The.County require that all excavations be all excavations are backfilled after activities on-site Sanitation backfilled after pipe has been pipe has been installed, with the Districts of installed, with the relative relative compaction required by the Orange County compaction required by the governing agency or a minimum of governing agency or a minimum 90 percent below the street zone of 90 percent below the street and 95 percent in the street zone zone and 95 percent in the street obtained as determined in zone obtained as determined in accordance with ASTM D 1557 or accordance with ASTM D 1557 or Test Method No. Calif. 216. Test Method No. Calif. 216. Compaction will be obtained by mechanical means, water jetting, hand tamping, or a combination of these methods. 1-4 In conjunction with the The County of Orange Sanitation Plan Review Prior to grading The County submittal of applications for Districts will submit to the City of activities Sanitation preliminary grading permits, the Irvine a construction detour plan Districts of County of Orange Sanitation for any planned detours within Orange County Districts shall submit a Irvine City limits in conjunction construction detour plan for any with the submittal of applications planned detours within Irvine for preliminary grading permits. City limits. The plan shall be The plan will be reviewed and reviewed and approved by the approved by the City's Director of City's Director of Public Works. Public Works. (This mitigation measure is from the Response to Comments on Supplement No. 1.) 8 ATTACHMENT 1 (Continued) Implementing Action/Condition or Method of Timing of Responsible Mitigation Measure Mechanism I Verification Verification Agency 1-5 Street pavement and surfaces The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection During grading The County will be removed for installation of all street pavement and surfaces activities on-site Sanitation the pipe and replaced to the that are removed for installation of Districts of requirements of the agency having the pipe are replaced to the Orange County jurisdiction over the right-of- requirements of the agency having way. All pavement cuts will be jurisdiction over the right-of-way; neat and straight along both sides that all pavement cuts are neat and of the trench and parallel to the straight along both sides of the alignment of the pipe to provide trench and parallel to the alignment an unfractured and level pave- of the pipe to provide an ment joint for bonding existing unfractured and level pavement surfacing with pavement replace- joint for bonding existing surfacing ment. Concrete pavement, in- with pavement replacement; that all cluding cross gutters, curbs and concrete pavement, including cross gutters, sidewalks, driveways, and gutters, curbs and gutters, side- concrete surface of whatever walks, driveways, and concrete are nature, will be sawcut to a removed in accordance with the minimum depth of 1-1/2 inches specifications; that all replacement prior to removal, in accordance are in kind and consist of Class A with the specifications. Replace- portland cement concrete; and that ment shall be in kind and consist the aggregate base and asphalt of Class A portland cement con- concrete mixes for pavement crete. Aggregate base and asphalt replacement conforms to the concrete mixes for pavement contract documents. replacement shall conform to the standard specifications of the jurisdictional authority. 9 I I I H [ [ I H I [ ATTACHMENT 1 (Continued) Implementing Action/Condition or Method of Timing of Responsible gation Measure Mechanism I Verification Verification Agency 1-6 During the course of The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection During grading The County construction, all pavement all pavement removed for trenching operations on- Sanitation removed for trenching operations operations is replaced with temp- site Districts of shall be replaced with temporary orary paving after compaction is Orange County paving after compaction is completed or within three days completed or within three days after the installation of the pipe, after the installation of the pipe, whichever comes first; that whichever comes first. Temporary temporary paving is maintained at paving will be maintained at all all times for vehicular traffic; that times for vehicular traffic. effective dust control is maintained Effective dust control will also be throughout the job by the maintained throughout the job by contractor; and that the use of the contractor. Use of water or water or dust palliative complies dust palliative will comply with with standard specifications. standard specifications. 1-7 Geologic studies will be The County Sanitation Districts of The County Prior to The County conducted as part of the detailed Orange County prepare geologic Sanitation . construction Sanitation design prepared for the construc- studies.. Districts of Districts of tion of the facilities by the Orange County Orange County County Sanitation Districts of shall approve Orange County. the geologic study 10 I 1 I a I I a a a a a s I a a I a e I ATTACHMENT I (Continued) Implementing FAction/Condition or Method of Timing of Responsible Mitigation Measure Mechanism Verification Verification Agency 1-8 The contractor will be re- The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection During grading The County quired to provide and maintain at the contractor provides and activities on-site Sanitation all times during construction maintains at all times during Districts of ample means and devices which construction ample means and Orange County will promptly remove and proper- devices which can promptly remove ly dispose of all water from any and properly dispose of all water source entering the excavations or from any source entering the other parts of the work. The con- excavations or other parts of the tractor will also be required to work; that fhe contractor complies comply with the provisions of the with the provisions of the District's District's NPDES permit in dis- NPDES permit in disposing of posing of water from the work. water from the work; that the The geotechnical investigation geotechnical investigation identifies will identify those areas where those areas where groundwater was groundwater is observed in hot- observed in borings; and that ings and comment on methods of comments were made on methods dewatering which might be of dewatering which might be employed. employed. Hvdroloev 2-1 Applicant shall obtain an en- The Districts obtain an Permit Review Prior to County Sanitation croachment permit and comply encroachment permit and complies & Field approval of Districts of with those measures identified by with those measures identified by Inspection grading plans Orange County the County of Orange, Environ- the County of Orange, Environ- mental Management Agency for mental Management Agency for the the crossing of County flood crossing of County flood control control facilities. facilities. 11 H @ ( H H H H H H @ Q H H H H H 1 @ H ATTACHMENT 1 (Continued) Implementing Action/Condition or Method of Timing of Responsible Mitigation Measure Mechanism Verification Verification Agency 2-2 Applicant shall also comply The Districts comply with all Field Inspection During all The County with all measures identified by measures identified by the U.S. construction Sanitation the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Army Corps of Engineers for the activities on-site Districts of for the crossing of the Santa Ana crossing of the Santa Ana River. Orange County River. Biota 3-1 All trees and large shrubs The Districts replace all trees and Field Inspection During grading The County removed as a result of the large shrubs removed as a result of activities on-site Sanitation proposed project will be replaced the proposed project on a one-to- Districts of on a one-to-one basis. The Mesa one basis. The District may reach Orange County Verde Country Club may be paid to an agreement with the Mesa for their replacement. Verde Country Club to pay for the the loss of trees and shrubs in lieu of their replacement. Noise 4-1 All construction equipment The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection During grading The County shall be stored on or near the area all construction equipment is stored activities on-site Sanitation under construction to eliminate on or near the area under Districts of daily heavy-duty truck trips on construction to eliminate daily Orange County vicinity roadways. heavy-duty truck trips on vicinity roadways. 4-2 All construction equipment, The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection During all The County stationary or mobile, shall be all construction equipment, construction Sanitation equipped with properly operating stationary or mobile, is equipped activities on-site Districts of and maintained mufflers, and all with properly operating and Orange County engines shall be kept in proper maintained mufflers, and that all tune. engines are kept in proper tune. 12 t 1 @ ATTACHMENT 1 (Continued) Implementing Action/Condition or Method of Timing of Responsible Mitigation Measure Mechanism Verification Vercation Agency 4-3 Construction activities shall The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection During all The County be restricted to the hours of 7am- all construction activities are construction Sanitation 7pm on weekdays and 9am-6pm restricted to the hours of 7am-7pm activities on-site Districts of on Saturdays, and/or as on weekdays and 9am-6pm on Orange County promulgated by the applicable Saturdays, as promulgated by the local jurisdiction, also no applicable local jurisdiction, and construction shall be permitted that no construction occurs outside - outside of these hours or on of these hours or on Sundays or Sundays or Federal holidays, Federal holidays, unless a waiver unless a waiver has been granted has been granted; any waiver takes by the Manager of Building and into account the impact upon the Safety. Any waiver shall take community. into account the impact upon the community. Land Use 5-1 Access to private properties The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection During all The County will be maintained during the access to private properties is construction Sanitation construction phase of the project. maintained during the construction activities on-site Districts of phase of the project. Orange County 5-2 All easements must be The Districts obtain all easements Easement Prior to The County obtained prior to construction prior to construction occurring Review construction Sanitation occurring along that portion of along that portion of the route. Districts of the route. Orange County n 13 ATTACHMENT 1 (Continued) Implementing Action/Condition or Method of Timing of Responsible Mitigation Measure Mechanism Verification Verification Agency Transportation & Circulation 6-1 Gisler Avenue, Washington The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection Prior to The County Avenue to Gibraltar Avenue all one eastbound and one construction Sanitation One eastbound and one westbound westbound lane is maintained on Districts of lane will be maintained on the the south side of the street at all Orange County south side of the street at all times. times. 6-2 Gibraltar Avenue: Gisler The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection During all The County Avenue to Sumatra Place all the street is closed to through construction Sanitation Gibraltar Avenue, Sumatra Place traffic, and that one lane on the activities on-site Districts of to Labrador Drive Street will be east side of the street, controlled by Orange County closed to through traffic. One a flagman during working hours, is lane on the east side of the street maintained for access to the and controlled by a flagman adjacent residences. during working hours will be maintained for access to the adjacent residences. 14 ATTACHMENT I (Continued) Implementing Action/Condition or Method of Timing of Responsible Mitigation Measure Mechanism Verification Verification Agency 6-3 Baker Street: General The Districts' engineer insures that Report Review Prior to the The County During the final design, detailed during the final design, a detailed beginning of Sanitation analysis of traffic volumes and analysis of traffic volumes and construction Districts of turning movements will be made turning movements is made to Orange County to determine final suggested lane determine final lane configurations configurations at various time at various time intervals. intervals. Following are con- ceptual traffic lane requirements for the anticipated construction zone phasing along Baker Street. They are subject to revision should the analysis point to a more efficient use of the roadway. 6-4 Baker Street: Labrador The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection During The County prive to College Street west of Harbor Boulevard one lane construction Sanitation West of Harbor Boulevard one is maintained for each direction of Districts of lane will be maintained for each traffic, and that at Harbor Orange County direction of traffic. At Harbor Boulevard one left-turn lane is Boulevard one left-turn lane will added on both the east and west be added on both the east and sides of the intersection. west sides of the intersection. 15 ATTACHMENT 1 (Continued) Implementing Action/Condition or Method of Timing of Responsible Mitigation Measure Mechanism Verification Verification Agency 6-5 Baker Street College Street The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection During The County to Loren Lane Two eastbound two eastbound lanes are maintained Construction Sanitation lanes will be maintained on the on the south side of the street at all Districts of south side of the street at all times; that two westbound lanes are Orange County times. Two westbound lanes will maintained on the north side of the be maintained on the north side of street during all non-working the street during all non-working hours; that during non-peak traffic hours. During non-peak traffic periods the westbound lane closest periods the westbound lane closest to the center of the street is closed to the center of the street will be and utilized for construction act- closed and utilized for construc- ivities; and that it will be returned - tion activities. It will be returned for traffic during peak traffic for traffic during peak traffic periods and all non-working hours. periods and all non-working hours. 16 [ [ [ 6 [ [ E [ [ [ [ [ I [ [ [ [ [ E ATTACHMENT I (Continued) Implementing Action/Condition or Method of Timing of Responsible Mitigation Measure Mechanism Verification Verification Agency 6-6 Baker Street: Loren Lane to The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection During The County Coolidge Avenue On the south on the south side of the street two Construction Sanitation side of the street two eastbound eastbound lanes plus one left-turn Districts of lanes plus one left-turn lane at lane at Fairview Road is maintained Orange County Fairview Road will be maintained at all times; that in the center of at all times. In the center of the the street two westbound lanes plus street two westbound lanes plus one left-turn lane at Fairview Road one left-turn lane at Fairview is maintained during all non- Road will be maintained during working hours; that during non- all non-working hours. During peak traffic periods the westbound non-peak traffic periods the lane adjacent to the pipeline is westbound lane adjacent to the closed and utilized for construction pipeline will be closed and util- activities; and that it is returned for ized for construction activities. It traffic during peak traffic periods will be returned for traffic during and all non-working hours. peak traffic periods and all non- working hours. 6-7 Baker Street: Coolidge The Districts insure that the same Plan Check Prior to The County Avenue to Babb Street concept of two eastbound lanes and Construction Sanitation Baker Street: Corona del Mar at least one westbound lane at all Districts of Freeway to Bristol Street times with a second westbound lane Orange County The same concept of two being added at peak traffic periods eastbound lanes and at least one and non-working hours is proposed westbound lane at all times with a in this phase as in the previous second westbound lane being phase. added at peak traffic periods and non-working hours is proposed in this phase a; in the previous phase. 17 d fl C [ [ l [ [ E L [ [ l [ I f [ f ATTACHMENT 1 (Continued) Implementing Action/Condition or Method of Timing of Responsible Mitigation Measure Mechanism Verification Verification Agency 6-8 Baker Street: Babb Street to The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection During The County the Corona del Mar Freeway two lanes for each direction of Construction Sanitation Two lanes for each direction of traffic are maintained at all times Districts of traffic will be maintained at all on the south side of the street while Orange County times on the south side of the construction is taking place on the street while construction is taking north side. place on the north side. 6-9 Baker Street: Bristol Street The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection During The County to Red Hill Avenue Two lanes two lanes for each direction of Construction Sanitation for each direction of traffic will traffic are maintained at all times Districts of be maintained at all times on the on the south side of the street while Orange County south side of the street while construction is taking place on the construction is taking place on the north side. north side. 6-10 Airwev Avenue - Airoort The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection During The County Loop Drive One lane will be one lane is maintained for each Construction Sanitation maintained for each direction of direction of traffic on the west and Districts of traffic on the west and north sides north sides of the street, Orange County of the street, respectively, while respectively, while the construction the construction activities are activities are confined to the other confined to the other side of the side of the street. street. 18 ATTACHMENT 1 (Continued) Implementing Action/Condition or Method of Timing of Responsible Mitigation Measure Mechanism Verification Verification Agency 6-1I Fairview Road: Baker The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection During The County Street to Paularino Channel northbound traffic remains in its Construction Sanitation Northbound traffic will remain in normal patterns, including the two Districts of its normal patterns, including the left-turn lanes at Baker Street; that Orange County two left-turn lanes at Baker two southbound lanes are Street. Two southbound lanes will maintained during peak traffic be maintained during peak traffic periods and non-working hours, periods and non-working hours, reducing one southbound lane reducing one southbound lane during non-peak working hours during non-peak working hours only. only. 6-12 Fairview Road: Paularino The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection During The County Channel to Fair Drive southbound traffic remains in its Construction Sanitation Fairview Road: Fair Drive to normal patterns on the west side of Districts of Wilson Street Southbound traffic the median; that two northbound Orange County will remain in its normal patterns lanes are maintained during peak on the west side of the median. periods and non-working hours; Two northbound lanes will be that during non-peak working maintained during peak periods hours the easterly northbound lane and non-working hours. During is closed and utilized for con- non-peak working hours the struction, being returned for peak easterly northbound lane will be traffic periods and non-working closed and utilized for con- hours. struction, being returned for peak traffic periods and non-working hours. 19 t t Q e ATTACHMENT 1 (Continued) Implementing Action/Condition or Method of Timing of Responsible Mitigation Measure Mechanism Verification Verification Agency 6-13 During the final design The Districts insure that during the Traffic Counts Prior to The County stage the City's hourly traffic final design stage the City's hourly Review Construction Sanitation counts will be reviewed to ident- traffic counts are reviewed to Districts of if the hours of the peak traffic identify the hours of the peak Orange County periods of each phase. In addi- traffic periods of each phase; and tion, the traffic flow at each in- that the traffic flow at each tersection will be reviewed for intersection is reviewed for specific specific requirements to be in- requirements to be incorporated in corporated in the traffic control the traffic control plan. plan. 6-14 Construction signing used The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection During The County for the handling of traffic for construction signing used for the Construction Sanitation public convenience shall conform handling of traffic for public Districts of to the latest edition of the "Work convenience conforms to the latest Orange County Area Traffic Control Handbook" edition of the "Work Area Traffic (WATCH) published by Building Control Handbook" (WATCH) News, Inc. and the Caltrans published by Building News, Inc. "Manual of Warning Signs, Lights, and the Caltrans "Manual of and Devices for Use in the Per- Warning Signs, Lights, and Devices formance of Work upon High- for Use in the Performance of ways," which will be included in Work upon Highways," and that the the specifications. In addition, signing, barricading, and diverting the signing, barricading, and di- of traffic is approved by the auth- verting of traffic shall be subject ority with jurisdiction over the to the approval of the authority street; and that the contractor with jurisdiction over the street maintains a 24-hour emergency (City of Costa Mesa). The con- service to remove, install, relocate, tractor will be required to main- and maintain warning devices. tain a 24-hour emergency service to remove, install, reloc-ate, and maintain warning devices. 20 ATTACHMENT I (Continued) Implementing Action/Condition or Method of Timing of Responsible gation Measure Mechanism Verification Verification Agency 6-15 Signs shall be posted in The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection Prior to The County advance of the construction signs are posted in advance of the Construction Sanitation period to warn motorists of the construction period to warn Districts of beginning date of the construction motorists of the beginning date of Orange County period. These signs shall be the construction period, and that posted on the affected arterial to the signs are posted on the affected advise motorists to use alternate arterial to advise motorists to use routes. alternate routes. 6-16 A backup contingency plan The Districts insure that a backup Plan Check Prior to The County for construction with sufficient contingency plan for construction Construction Sanitation number of traffic lanes to remain with sufficient number of traffic Districts of open during peak hours shall be lanes to remain open during peak Orange County prepared. The number of traffic hours has been prepared. lanes needed may depend upon the peak hour traffic flow, or volume to capacity ratio, and the severity of blockage of driveways. At critical intersections all of the existing traffic lanes might need to be fully opened during the peak hours. This could mean that construction activities at these critical intersections might need to cease during the peak hours, unless sufficient volume of traffic is diverted to alternate routes. In the case that traffic congestion at critical intersections is too severe, the contingency plan shall be affected. 21 ATTACHMENT I (Continued) Implementing Action/Condition or Method of Timing of Responsible Mitigation Measure Mechanism I Verification Verification Agency 6-17 Affected property owners The Districts notify all affected Notice Check Prior to The County and business shall be sufficiently property owners and businesses. Construction Sanitation notified in advance of Districts of construction. Orange County 6-18 The Traffic Control Plan The Districts insure that the Traffic Plan Check Prior to The County for construction shall designate Control Plan for construction Construction Sanitation the responsibility and incorporate designates the responsibility and Districts of provisions for daily supervision of incorporates provisions for daily Orange County construction traffic safety supervision of construction traffic including inspection of detour safety including inspection of plans, signing and safety detour plans, signing and safety problems. problems. 6-19 Construction through The Districts' engineer insures that Construction Prior to and The County parking lots and easement areas construction through parking lots Schedule Check During Sanitation will be phased and scheduled so as and easement areas is phased and Construction Districts of to minimize disruptions to scheduled so as to minimize disrup- Orange County existing uses. tions to existing uses. 6-20 Replacement parking for The Districts' engineer insures that Plan Check Prior to and The County temporarily displaced private replacement parking for During Sanitation parking shall be considered. temporarily displaced private Construction Districts of parking is considered. Orange County 22 1 1 [ 1 [ [ [ [ L [ 1 t fl [ f 1 1 [ [ ATTACHMENT 1 (Continued) Implementing Action/Condition or Method of Timing of Responsible Mitigation Measure Mechanism Verification Verification Agency 6-21 Construction along Airway The Districts' engineer insures that Plan Check Prior to and The County Avenue will be phased and sched- construction along Airway Avenue During Sanitation uled to permit vehicular access is phased and scheduled to permit Construction Districts of from Airway Avenue to airport vehicular access from Airway Orange County facilities located off of Paularino Avenue to airport facilities located and Baker Streets. Emergency off of Paularino and Baker Streets; access will be maintained at all that emergency access is times. Prior to construction, the maintained at all times; and that applicant shall coordinate with the prior to construction, the applicant County of Orange/John Wayne has coordinated with the County of Airport and the owners of Orange/John Wayne Airport and affected buildings to incorporate the owners of affected buildings to measures which would minimize incorporate measures which would disruption to existing operations. minimize disruption to existing operations. 6-22 Parking for construction The Districts' engineer insures that Plan Check Prior to and The County employees shall be arranged in parking for construction employees During Sanitation order that impact on existing is arranged in order that impact on Construction Districts of parking spaces shall be existing parking spaces is Orange County minimized. minimized. 6-23 No less than two (2) weeks The Districts' engineer insures that Plan Check Prior to and The County prior to the implementation of the no less than two (2) weeks prior to During Sanitation proposed project, the Orange the implementation of the proposed Construction Districts of County Transit District shall be project, the Orange County Transit Orange County contacted in order to coordinate District is contacted in order to access to bus stops and bus vehicle coordinate access to bus stops and movements through the project bus vehicle movements through the area. project area. 23 ATTACHMENT 1 (Continued) Implementing Action/Condition or Method of Timing of Responsible Mitigation Measure Mechanism Verification Verification Agency 6-24 A plan shall be prepared to The Districts insure that a plan is Plan Check Prior to The County safeguard school children at the prepared to safeguard school Construction Sanitation school zones and school crossings children at the school zones and Districts of in the vicinity of Gisler at school crossings in the vicinity of Orange County Gibraltar, and Baker at Babb. Gisler at Gibraltar, and Baker at Temporary school guards (if not Babb; that temporary school guards available at the affected cross- (if not available at the affected ings), flashing signals and other crossings), flashing signals and devices shall be considered at other devices are considered at locations along the sidewalks or locations along the sidewalks or street crossings where the street crossings where the construction activities and construction activities and pavement conditions might cause pavement conditions might cause new safety hazards to school age new safety hazards to school age children. The school district children; and that the school should be consulted in the district is consulted in the preparation of contingency preparation of contingency measures to protect school measures to protect school children. children. 6-25 Prior to the implementation The Districts insure that prior to Plan Check Prior to The County of construction an application for the implementation of construc- Construction Sanitation a "Utilities Encroachment Permit" tion an application for a "Utilities Districts of shall be sent to Caltrans Los Encroachment Permit" is sent to Orange County Angeles or Orange County. Caltrans Los Angeles or Orange Comments from the various County, and that comments from divisions of Caltrans shall be the various divisions of Caltrans are incorporated into the final plans. incorporated into the final plans. 24 ATTACHMENT I (Continued) Implementing Action/Condition or Method of Timing of Responsible gation Measure Mechanism Verification Verification Agency 6-26 The applicant shall The Districts will coordinate with Contact John Prior to The County coordinate with John Wayne John Wayne Airport operations and Wayne Airport Construction Sanitation Airport operations and facilities facilities prior to the initiation of Districts of prior to the initiation of the the Project's construction activities. Orange County project's construction activities. (This mitigation measure is from the Response to Comments on Supplement No. I.) 6-27 The access to John Wayne The Districts' engineer will ensure Field Inspection During The County Airport and the construction areas that access to John Wayne Airport Construction Sanitation at the airport shall be maintained and the construction areas at the Districts of during the construction phase of airport are maintained during the Orange County the project. (This mitigation construction phase of the project. measure is from the Response to Comments on Supplement No. 1.) 6-28 A temporary unpaved access The Districts' engineer will ensure Field Inspection During The County road shall be provided that will that a temporary unpaved access Construction Sanitation maintain access to the Country road is provided that will maintain Districts of Club from Gisler Avenue at all access to the Country Club from Orange County times. An opening would be Gisler Avenue at all times, and that required in the fence that runs a flagman is stationed at the along the northern property line temporary access road and Gisler of the Country Club. A flagman Avenue to direct all vehicles onto would be stationed at the the Country Club property. temporary access road and Gisler Avenue to direct all vehicles onto the Country Club property. (This mitigation measure is from Supplement No. 2.) 25 f [ f [ [ [ [ E [ [ fl [ fl [ [ E f 9 [ ATTACHMENT 1 (Continued) Implementing Action/Condition or Method of Timing of Responsible Mitigation Measure Mechanism Verification Verification Agency 6-29 Signs shall be posted a week The Districts' engineer will ensure Field Inspection During The County in advance of the closing of the that signs are posted a week in Construction Sanitation regular access road and the advance of the closing of the Districts of opening of the temporary access regular access road and the opening Orange County road. (This mitigation measure is of the temporary access road. from Supplement No. 2.) 6-30 A flagman will be posted at The Districts' engineer will ensure Field Inspection During The County the intersection of the temporary that a flagman is posted at the Construction Sanitation access road and the regular access intersection of the temporary access Districts of road on the Country Club road and the regular access road on - Orange County property to direct vehicles. (This the Country Club property to direct mitigation measure is from vehicles. Supplement No. 2.) 6-31 The Country Club property The Districts' engineer will ensure Field Inspection During The County will be returned to its preproject that the Country Club property is Construction Sanitation condition after construction or a returned to its preproject condition Districts of fee will be paid by the CSDOC to after construction or the CSDOC Orange County the Country Club for their will pay a fee to the Country Club returning the property to its for their returning the property to preconstructon condition. (This its preconstructon condition. mitigation measure is from Supplement No. 2.) 26 ATTACHMENT I (Continued) Implementing Action/Condition or Method of Timing of Responsible Mitigation Measure Mechanism Verification Verification Agency Recreation 7-1 During construction within The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection During The County the Mesa Verde Country Club during construction within the Construction Sanitation easement, a minimum seven-foot Mesa Verde Country Club Districts of chain link fence shall be provided easement, a minimum seven-foot Orange County for the safety of country club chain link fence is provided for the members. After construction, safety of country club members; easement regrading and and that after construction, revegelation shall occur as easement regrading and specified by the Mesa Verde revegelation occurs as specified by Country Club. the Mesa Verde Country Club. Electricity 8-1 All excavation activities The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection During The County related to the proposed project all excavation activities related to Construction Sanitation shall be performed in such a way the proposed project is performed Districts of as to protect all existing electrical in such a way as to protect all Orange County lines. existing electrical lines. 8-2 The applicant shall The Districts coordinate with SCE Plan Check Prior to The County coordinate with SCE to ensure to insure that existing electrical Construction Sanitation that existing electrical service will service is not interrupted during Districts of not be interrupted during project project construction; and that any Orange County construction. Any relocation of relocation of electrical lines is in a electrical lines shall be in a manner specified by the Southern manner specified by the Southern Edison Company. Edison Company. 27 1 fl fl 1 fl fl 1 6 fl fl 1 & fl 1 1 1 H fl H ATTACHMENT I (Continued) Implementing Action/Condition or Method of Timing of Responsible gation Measure Mechanism Verification Verification Agency Natural Gas 9-1 All excavation activities The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection During The County related to the proposed project all excavation activities related to Construction Sanitation shall be performed in such a way the proposed project are performed Districts of as to protect all existing gas lines. in such a way as to protect all Orange County existing gas lines. 9-2 Prior to the relocation of any The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection Prior to The County existing gas lines, the Southern prior to the relocation of any Construction Sanitation California Gas Company shall be existing gas lines, the Southern Districts of contacted. Any relocation of gas California Gas Company is Orange County lines shall be in a manner contacted; and that any relocation specified by the Southern of gas lines is in a manner specified California Gas Company. by the Southern California Gas Company. Water 10-1 All excavation activities The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection Prior to The County related to the proposed project all excavation activities related to Construction Sanitation shall be performed in such a way the proposed project are performed Districts of as to protect all existing water in such a way as to protect all Orange County lines. existing water lines. 10-2 Prior to the relocation of The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection Prior to The County any existing water lines, the Mesa prior to the relocation of any Construction Sanitation Consolidated Water District shall existing water lines, the Mesa Districts of be contacted. Any relocation of Consolidated Water District is Orange County water lines shall be in a manner contacted; and that any relocation specified by the Mesa of water lines is in a manner Consolidated Water District. specified by the Mesa Consolidated Water District. 28 fl fl E E E [ E I I I I I a ATTACHMENT I (Continued) Implementing Action/Condition or Method of Timing of Responsible Mitigation Measure Mechanism Verification Verification Agency Sewers 11-1 All excavating activities The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection Prior to The County related to the proposed project all excavating activities related to Construction Sanitation shall be performed in such a way the proposed project are performed Districts of as to protect existing sewer lines, in such a way as to protect existing Orange County sewer lines. 11-2 Prior to construction, the The Districts insure that prior to Plan Check Prior to The County City of Costa Mesa Sanitary construction, the City of Costa Construction Sanitation District (CMSD) shall be afforded Mesa Sanitary District (CMSD) is Districts of the opportunity to review precise afforded the opportunity to review Orange County alignment plans. Any subsequent precise alignment plans; and that protection or relocation plans, as any subsequent protection or may be required by the CMSD relocation plans, as may be required shall also be provided by the by the CMSD is provided by the applicant. applicant. Telephone 12-1 All excavation activities The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection Prior to The County related to the proposed project all excavation activities related to Construction Sanitation shall be performed in such a way the proposed project is performed Districts of as to protect existing telephone in such a way as to protect existing Orange County lines. telephone lines. 29 ATTACHMENT 1 (Continued) Implementing Action/Condition or Method of Timing of Responsible Mitigation Measure Mechanism Verification Verification Agency 12-2 The applicant shall provide The Districts provide Pacific Bell Plan Check Prior to The County Pacific Bell the opportunity to the opportunity to review final Construction Sanitation review final construction plans. construction plans, and six months Districts of The applicant shall provide advance notice of construction Orange County Pacific Bell six months advance activities in the event that any notice of construction activities in relocation may be required. Any the event that any relocation may relocation of telephone lines is in a be required. Any relocation of manner specified by Pacific Bell. telephone lines shall be in a manner specified by Pacific Bell. Health & Safety 13-1 A guard should be placed at The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection During The County all school crossings during normal a guard is placed at all school Construction Sanitation school hours while construction is crossings during normal school Districts of within 500 feet of any school - hours while construction is within Orange County crossing. 500 feet of any school crossing. 13-2 The final design will inves- The Districts' engineer insures that Plan Check Prior to The County tigate the interrelationships of the the final design will investigate the Construction Sanitation pipeline location, vehicular interrelationships of the pipeline Districts of traffic, and the school's schedule location, vehicular traffic, and the Orange County to develop specific requirements school's schedule to develop to avoid adverse impact to the specific requirements to avoid school as well as the project adverse impact to the school as well facilities. I as the project facilities. 30 ATTACHMENT 1 (Continued) Implementing Action/Condition or Method of Timing of Responsible Mitigation Measure Mechanism Verification Verification Agency 13-3 Construction activities in The Districts' engineer insures that Plan Check Prior to The County the vicinity of identified school construction activities in the Construction Sanitation zones should be phased for the vicinity of identified school zones Districts of summer months or another time are phased for the summer months Orange County when the schools are not in or another time when the schools session. are not in session. 13-4 Signs, lights and flagmen The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection During The County should be utilized as necessary to signs, lights and flagmen are Construction Sanitation ensure safe, adequate access for utilized as necessary to ensure safe, Districts of pedestrians and vehicles at all adequate access for pedestrians and Orange County times. vehicles at all times. 13-5 Contractors shall comply The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection Prior to The County with all applicable laws and contractors comply with all Construction Sanitation regulations. applicable laws and regulations. Districts of Orange County 13-6 Construction signing used The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection Prior to The County for handling traffic and public construction signing used for Construction Sanitation convenience should conform to handling traffic and public Districts of the State of California, convenience conforms to the State Orange County Department of Transportation, of California, Department of Manual of Warning Signs, Lights, Transportation, Manual of Warning and Devices for Use in Perfor- Signs, Lights, and Devices for Use mance of Work Upon Highways, in Performance of Work Upon latest edition. Highways, latest edition. 31 ATTACHMENT I (Continued) Implementing Action/Condition or Method of Timing of Responsible Mitigation Measure Mechanism Verification Verification Agency 13-7 All signs should be The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection Prior to The County illuminated or reflectorized when all signs are illuminated or Construction Sanitation they are used during hours of reflectorized when they are used Districts of darkness. All cones, pylons, during hours of darkness; and that Orange County barricades or posts used in the all cones, pylons, barricades or diversion of traffic should be posts used in the diversion of provided with flashers or other traffic are provided with flashers satisfactory illumination if in or other satisfactory illumination if place during hours of darkness. in place during hours of darkness. 13-8 The signing, barricading, The Districts' engineer insures that Field Check During The County and diverting of traffic should be the signing, barricading, and Construction Sanitation subject to the approval of the diverting of traffic is subject to the Districts of authority with jurisdiction over approval of the authority with Orange County such public streets. The con- jurisdiction over such public tractor should maintain a 24-hour streets. The contractor will emergency service to remove, maintain a 24-hour emergency install, relocate, and maintain service to remove, install, relocate, warning devices and should and maintain warning devices and furnish to the authority, names will furnish to the authority, names and telephone numbers of those and telephone numbers of those persons responsible for this persons responsible for this emergency service. In the event emergency service. In the event those persons do not promptly those persons do not promptly respond or the authority deems it respond or the authority deems it necessary to call out other forces necessary to call out other forces to to accomplish emergency service, accomplish emergency service, the the Contractor should be held Contractor is held responsible for responsible for the cost of such the cost of such emergency service. emergency service. 32 ATTACHMENT 1 (Continued) Implementing Action/Condition or Method of Timing of Responsible Mitigation Measure Mechanism Verification Verification Agency 13-9 The Contractor should The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection During The County provide and maintain such fences, the Contractor provides and Construction Sanitation barriers, directional signs, lights, maintains such fences, barriers, Districts of and flagmen as are necessary to directional signs, lights, and Orange County give adequate warning to the flagmen as are necessary to give public at all times of any adequate warning to the public at dangerous conditions to be all times of any dangerous encountered as a result of the conditions to be encountered as a construction work and to give result of the construction work and directions to the public. to give directions to the public. 13-10 To provide maximum The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection During The County safety for the residents of the during construction a minimum 7- Construction Sanitation surrounding residential foot chain link fence or other Districts of developments as well as the means of securement to preclude Orange County general public, the construction unauthorized entry to any specification will provide for the excavation during all non-working erection of a minimum 7-foot hours (24-hour basis) including chain link fence or other means of weekends and holidays will be securement to preclude un- erected. authorized entry to any excavation during all non-work- ing hours (24-hour basis) including weekends and holidays. 13-11 While construction The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection During The County operations are under way, the during construction operations, the Construction Sanitation contractor will be required to contractor will provide means to Districts of provide means to protect the protect the public from his Orange County public from his activities and to activities and to restrict access to restrict access to the construction the construction site to authorized site to authorized personnel. personnel. 33 8 b ✓< I Q I f [ 8 1 I 1 � r � d Y I E 6 ATTACHMENT 1 (Continued) Implementing Action/Condition or Method of Timing of Responsible Mitigation Measure Mechanism Verification Verification Agency 13-12 Security will be provided The contractor provides security at Field Inspection During The County at equipment yard areas and other equipment yard areas and other Construction Sanitation dangerous sites, by the contractor. dangerous sites. Districts of Orange County 13-13 The fencing or other The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection During The County security measures around the the fencing or other security Construction Sanitation construction area should preclude measures around the construction Districts of entry to the stockpiled, machinery area are erected to preclude entry Orange County and excavation area. to the stockpiled, machinery and excavation area. 13-14 In heavily developed areas The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection During The County or where appropriate, the in heavily developed areas or where Construction Sanitation excavated material will be appropriate, the excavated material Districts of removed and stockpiled off-site is being removed and stockpiled Orange County to protect public safety when such off-site to protect public safety action is necessary. when such action is necessary. 13-15 Every effort shall be made The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection During The County to minimize the impacts of odors every effort is being made to Construction Sanitation when tie-ins are made. minimize the impacts of odors Districts of when tie-ins are made. Orange County Aesthetic 14-1 Landscaping programs will The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection During The County be coordinated with sewer landscaping programs are being Construction Sanitation construction projects to re- coordinated with sewer Districts of establish landscaped areas construction projects to re-establish Orange County impacted by construction. landscaped areas impacted by construction. 34 ATTACHMENT 1 (Continued) Implementing Action/Condition or Method of Timing of Responsible Mitigation Measure Mechanism I Verification Verification Agency 14-2 Excess earth will be The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection During The County removed from areas of sewer excess earth is being removed from Construction Sanitation construction, or be recontoured in areas of sewer construction, or Districts of conjunction with landscaping being recontoured in conjunction Orange County programs. with landscaping programs. 14-3 Where sewer lines are pro- The Districts' engineer insures that Field Inspection During The County posed to be located in slope areas, where sewer lines are proposed to Construction Sanitation they should be buried in order to be located in slope areas, they are Districts of avoid long-term visual impacts. being buried in order to avoid Orange County Excavation should be conducted long-term visual impacts; and that with minimal grading of slopes. excavation is being conducted with Revegetation of disturbed areas minimal grading of slopes; and that should commence immediately revegetation of disturbed areas is after project completion. commencing immediately after project completion. 35 t t t 7 �- � NO �9 FOR 14 pND GANIZAtION .IRKS N0� pND 13 D itEOR LION pIS CAS NO PROPOSEII SpNI1OF D'I CEPIOR OF G i IZNJ ri INS ER pINS RROR BAK?,-BAKER FORCE SPONSESON ZNE MENTS RR _ � � �� EEAO AGENCY pISTRICTS OYYY COUNTY SANI OFT GRANGE GOUNtY EN�IRONMENTAE CONSU0AN1 SIVS ND CORUCTO N ULTRAS A NST T NIcts UE4ARTM ENVIRONMENT AI SER2 'ifORNIN g2I14 IRVINE CAI r RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON THE r DRAFT SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 r TO THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PROPOSED REORGANIZATION NO. 79 r FORMATION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14 AND REORGANIZATION OF DISTRICTS NO. 7 AND 13 RE BAKER-GISLER INTERCEPTOR AND r BAKER FORCE MAINS �^ SCH NO. 92021035 r LEAD AGENCY: r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF r ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92728-8127 r ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT: ULTRASYSTEMS ENGINEERS AND CONSTRUCTORS, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT 2030 MAIN STREET, 14th FLOOR IRVINE, CA 92714 (714) 955-4000 APRIL 1992 r TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Paee 1.0 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1 r 2.0 Written Comments Received on the Draft Supplement NO. 2 To The Final Environmental Impact Report Proposed Reorganization NO. 79 Formation of County Sanitation District NO. 14 and Reorganization of Districts NO. 7 and 13 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1 STATE AGENCIES 2.1 State of California, Department of Transportation, Robert F. Joseph, Advance Planning Branch, Comment 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-2 2.2 State of California, Governor's Office of Planting and Research, Christine Vine, Acting Deputy Director, Permit Assistance, Comment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-3 CITY AGENCIES 2.3 City of Costa Mesa, Development Services Department, Kristen C. Pecos, Associate Planner, Comments 3 and 4 . . . . . . . . . . . 2-4 3.0 Oral Comments Received on Draft Supplement NO. 2 To The Final Environmental Impact Report Proposed Reorganization NO. 79 Formation of County Sanitation r District NO. 14 and Reorganization of Districts NO. 7 and 13 Before the County Sanitation Disticts of Orange County at the Public Hearing on April 8, 1992 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1 3.1 Chuck Friedersdorf, Comments 5, 6 and 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1 4.0 Responses to Written and Oral Comments Received on the Draft Supplement NO. 2 To The Final Environmental Impact Report Proposed Reorganization NO. 79 Formation of County Sanitation District NO. 14 and Reorganization of Districts NO. 7 and 13 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1 .d i 1.0 INTRODUCTION This Responses to Comments volume of the Draft Supplement NO. 2 To The Final Environmental Impact Report Proposed Reorganization NO. 79 Formation of County Sanitation District NO. 14 and Reorganization of Districts NO. 7 and 13 provides responses to all written comments received by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County on the Draft EIR (DEIR) during the 30- day public review period, and responses to the oral comments received during the public hearing held on Draft Supplement No.2 on April 8, 1992 before the Joint m Board of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. All of the written comments received on Draft Supplement No. 2 are presented in section 2.0 of this document; all of the oral comments received on Draft Supplement No. 2 during the public hearing are presented in section 3.0; and the responses to all of the written and oral comments are presented in section 4.0. Each individual comment received, either written or oral(sections 2.0 and 3.0),has been numbered in descending order. The location of each comment in the letter received or the transcript of the public hearing is located in the right ^d column. The comment number corresponds to the response number. Therefore, the response to comment number 1 is response number 1 in section 4.0. The 30-day period for review of the DEIR began on March 18, 1992 and ended on April 16, 1992. All written comments received during the 30-day review period are responded to in this document. r Section 15044 of the State CEQA Guidelines grants any person or entity authority to submit comments on a Draft EIR concerning any environmen- tal effects of the proposed project. Some of the written and oral comments, which have been included in this Responses to Comments volume of the EIR, raise issues which do not either address the adequacy of completeness of Draft Supplement No. 2, raise environmental issues, or request incorporation of additional information. Comments specifically raising issue with the proposed project have not been addressed, other than as they may relate to the adequacy of Draft Supplement No. 2 or request further discussion or analysis of specific environmental issues. A substantive response to such correspondence is, therefore, not appropriate within the context of the California Environmental Quality Act. However,each written correspondence received in response to Draft Supplement No. 2 during the public review period is included in section 2.0 in their original form. Each verbal correspondence received at public hearing held on April 8, 1992 was recorded, and then a summary of the environmental concerns was prepared and presented in section 3.0 of this document. 1-1 2.0 WRITTEN COMMENTS RECEIVED ON THE DRAFT' SUPPLE- MENT NO. 2 TO THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PROPOSED REORGANIZATION NO. 79 FORMATION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14 AND REORGANI- ZATION OF DISTRICTS NO. 7 AND 13 In total three written correspondences were received on Draft Supplement No. 2. Copies of the actual letters received are presented in this section of the document. Each environmental comment in each letter received .� has been assigned a number (Comment Number) in descending order which corresponds with the Response Numbers in section 4.0 of this document. The Comment Number is displayed in the right hand margin of the letter. 2-1 %TXTM CAUFORNIA-BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATION AGENCY PM WIISON, G -r DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 12 2301 PUUMAN STREET - SANTA ANA. CA 92205 March 30, 1992 Thomas Davis File: IGR/CEQA Orange County Sanitation District SCH#92021035 10844 Ellis Avenue ORA405-8.74-12.64 Fountain Valley, CA 92728 Subject: Notice of Preparation for a Draft Environmental Impact Report for a Proposed Reorganization of County Sanitation Districts. Dear Mr. Davis: Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Notice of Preparation for a Draft Environmental Impact Report for a Proposed Reorganization of the County Sanitation Districts. At issue is accessibility to Mesa Verde Country Club from Gisler Avenue. The main characteristic of the project is to maintain accessibility to the Mesa Verde Country Club from Gisler Avenue at all times. The site is located within the city boundaries of Fountain Valley, Costa Mesa, and Irvine in the County of Orange. (Caltrans has no 1 comment at this time] Please continue to keep us informed of any further developments that could potentially impact our State Transportation Facilities. If you have questions or need to contact us, please feel free to call Anthony P. Lee of my staff at (714) 724-2250. Sincerely, ROBERT F. JOSEP , Chief Advance Planning Branch cc: Howard Lee, Hydraulics, Caltrans Ron Helgeson, HDQTRS "' Tom Loftus, OPR STATE OF CALIFORNIA PETE WILSON, Govemor GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH - s 1400 TENTH STREET SACRAMENTO,CA 95814 Apr 16, 1992 THOMAS DAVIS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN CITY, CA 92728 Subject: PROPOSED REORGANIZATION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS SCH P 92021035 ,r Dear THOMAS DAVIS: [The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named environmental document to selected state agencies for review. The review period is closed and none of the state agencies have comments. This letter acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental documents, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act Please call Tom Loftus at (916) 445-0613 if you have any questions regarding the environmental review process. When contacting the Clearinghouse in this matter, please use the eight-digit State Clearinghouse number so that we may respond promptly. Serely, v ( V C ristine i e ,,, Acting Deput. Director, Permit Assistance m , CITY OF COSTA MESA CA FOBMW V1Ba1.1= PA.BOX tan } m V DE DPME S WCES DEP�EW m April 9, 1992 r Mr. Thomas Dawes Otl County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 m RE: DRAFT SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 TO FINAL EIR FOR REORGANIZATION NO. 79, m FORMATION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14, AND REOROM12ATION OF DISTRICTS NO. 7 AND NO. 13 REGARDING BARER-GISLER INTERCEPTOR AND BARER FORCE MAINS m Dear Mr. Dawes: The Draft Supplement No. 2 to the Final EIR referenced above was reviewed by Peter Naghavi, Transport tion Services Division, and by myself for the Planning Division. The City of Costa Mesa has no comments on the analysis presented in Section 5.0 except to offer an update with respect to information in the first paragraph on Y0 page 13, including footnote 3. On March 16, 1992, the City Council adopted the 1990 General Plan r' which includes a revised Master Plan of Highways. The MPH retains the Gisler Avenue bridge over the Santa Ana river to be consistent 3 with the County's MPAH. However, the Council has initiated studies with the County and the cities of Huntington Beach, Newport Beach, and Fountain valley to investigate alternatives to the bridge. The following policy was adopted to clarify the City's position: m 195. Council shall review the cooperative study to delete the Gisler Avenue and 19th Street bridges, and downgrading East 19th Street every 60 days or m more often if needed. Upon completion of the cooperative study, the City shall process a General Plan Amendment to delete the bridges and the m widening of East 19th Street from the City's Master Plan of Highways. All future development applications submitted to the City shall be reviewed in such a way that the 19th Street and " Gisler Avenue bridges, and the widening of East 19th Street, will not be included as mitigation measures m a_4 F/FMP MP m ButlEMp DlvMbn(714)>50.5818 . COCe EFMammUBw LlcFnw(714)756529i . P Mg DiWion(714)) N5 The mitigation measure proposed on page 13 adequately addresses the concerns noted in our response to the Notice of Preparation. Thank 41 you for this additional opportunity to comment on the proposed projectO Sincerely, r RRISTEN C. PETROS - Associate Planner !+ (SAMW.LTmC12 cc: Peter Naghavi, City of Costa Mesa Transportation Services r r m r m r r r r .2_s r, 3.0 ORAL COMMENTS RECEIVED ON THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC HEARING ON APRIL 8, 1992 On April 8, 1992 a public hearing was held before the Joint Board of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. At this public hearing one individual made comments, but only some of the comments pertained to environmental issues. Following is the name of the commentor and the oral comments he made that pertained to the environment. Each comment is numbered continuing the numbering sequence established in section 2.0. The responses to the oral comments are presented in section 4.0 of this document. 3.1 Oral Comments by Chuck Friedersdorf Comment5: The concern of the Country Club is that the property be returned to the same condition it was in prior to the sewer line being installed. Comment 6: The Country Club is concerned with the safety of the line and that it be odor-free. Comment 7: The Country Club is concerned that if the bridge is built that it too will have an adverse impact on the maintenance road off Gisler Avenue. 3-1 V 4.0 RESPONSES TO WRITTEN AND ORAL COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SUPPLEMENT NO.2 TO THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PROPOSED REORGANIZATION NO. 79 y FORMATION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14 AND REORGANIZATION OF DISTRICTS NO. 7 AND 13 4.1 The Following Response is to the Written Comment From the State of California Department of Tran=rtation. Robert F. Joseph. Advance Planning Branch Comment 1: Caltrans has no comment at this time. .- Response 1: A response is not required. 4.2 The Following Response is to the Written Comments From the State — of California. Governor's Office of Planning and Research Christine Kinne. Actingpeply Director. Permit Assistance Comment 2: The State Clearinghouse submitted the environmental docu- ment to selected state agencies for review. The review period is closed and none of the state agencies have comments. This letter acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental documents, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Response 2: A response is not required. 4.3 The Following Response is to the Written Comments From the Cily .. of Costa Mesa,Development Services Department.Kristen C.Petros. Associate Planner Comment 3: The City of Costa Mesa has no comments on the analysis presented in Section 5.0 except to offer an update with respect to information in the first paragraph on page 13, including footnote 3. On March 16, 1992, the City Council adopted the 1990 General Plan which includes a revised Master Plan of Highways. The MPH retains the Gisler Avenue bridge over the Santa Ana River to be consistent with the County's MPAH. However,the Council has initiated studies with the County and the cities of Huntington Beach, Newport Beach, and Fountain Valley to investigate alternatives to the bridge. The following policy was adopted to clarify the City's position: 4.1 195. Council shall review the cooperative study to delete the Gisler Avenue and 19th Street bridges, and downgrading East 19th Street every 60 days or more often if needed. Upon completion of the cooperative study, the City shall process a General Plan Amendment to delete the bridges and the widening of East 19th Street from the City's s, Master Plan of Highways. All future development applications submitted to the City shall be reviewed in such a way that the 19th Street and Gisler Avenue o, bridges, and the widening of East 19th Street, will not be included as mitigation measures. Response 3: The new information provided in the comment is accepted as revising the information in Draft Supplement No. 2. —� Comment 4: The mitigation measure proposed on page 13 adequately addresses the concerns noted in our response to the Notice of Preparation. Response 4: A response is not required. 4.4 The Following Responses are to the Oral Comments Made by Chuck Friedersdorf at the April 8. 1992 Public Hearine Comment 5: The concern of the Country Club is that the property be returned to the same condition it was in prior to the sewer line being installed. Response 5: Draft Supplement No. 2 at the bottom of page 13 provides the following mitigation measure: 'The Country Club property shall a be returned to its pre-project condition after construction or a fee shall be paid by the CSDOC to the Country Club for their a returning the property to its pre-construction condition." Implementation of this mitigation measure will maintain the - existing environmental conditions of the golf course. Comment 6: The Country Club is concerned with the safety of the line and that it be odor-free. Response 6: These environmental concerns were fully addressed in previous environmental documents certified by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC), and these concerns were not readdressed in Draft Supplement No. 2. The contents of Draft Supplement No. 2 was focused by the Court to address only the issue of access to the Country Club from Gisler Avenue. The previous environmental documents stated that the sewer line shall be installed with the utmost care, and the line 4-2 r shall be safe, odor-free, and there will be no need to constantly monitor the line. The line would, however,be inspected on the regular CSDOC basis. r Comment 7: The Country Club is concerned that if the bridge is built that it too will have an adverse impact on the maintenance road off r Gisler Avenue. Response 7: The issue of the effect of the proposed Garfield-Gisler Bridge r Over Santa Ana River was fully addressed in section 5.1.3 Cumulative Impacts of Draft Supplement No. 2. The existing design of the proposed bridge allows the existing access road to the Country Club off Gisler Avenue to be maintained at its _ existing location. It is the responsibility of the County of Orange EMA and not the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County to maintain access to the Country Club if the bridge is built after the sewer line has been installed. Draft Supplement No. 2 addresses how both the sewer line and the bridge can be installed without affecting the existing access location to the Country Club off Gisler Avenue. r r r r r r r r 43 1 NEW DIRECTORS' DEBT FINANCING WORKSHOP WEDNESDAY - JUNE 3, 1992 5:30 P.M. For the benefit of new Directors, the Districts' financial team consisting of staff, the underwriters and bond counsel will present a workshop on Wednesday, June 3, 1992 at 5:30 p.m. in the Districts' Administrative Office. All Board Members of course, are invited and encouraged to attend. The presentation will include background information on the Districts' financial plan, general information on how municipal debt financing works, the legal/tax implications, the alternatives under consideration, and the Districts' short-term and long-term financing strategies. For the convenience of those attending, a light dinner will be served. Therefore to hel staff in their lannin we would a reciate it if ou would v ❑ YES, I PLAN TO ATTEND. NO, I WILL BE UNABLE TO ATTEND. Director's Name Printed GM/FORMS F7.2 c-w Pnmnm AWAM Project Summary Lfltccf�f U-If INI, t—�fl County Sanitation Districts of Orange County May 1992 `� Recycled popes background materials substitution,and continuing educational 5 programs directed at promoting safe industrial and The County Sanitation Districts of Orange household waste disposal practices.The goals of County(Districts)are a governmental agency that the Action Plan have been incorporated into the provides for the wastewater treatment needs for Districts' ongoing Pollution Prevention Program. over two million people in 23 cities and W unincorporated areas of Orange County.The pollution Prevention Program Districts presently treat over 225 million gallons per day of residential,commercial and industrial In 1984,the Districts implemented a waste wastewater at two regional wastewater treatment minimization policy to control and reduce the plants that discharge to the ocean.Ova 1,000 quantity of toxic materials discharged by industries are regulated as part of the Districts' industrial users to the Districts' sewerage system. federally approved pretreatment program.Of To achieve these objectives,mass emission rates these,400 are considered to be significant (rather than concentration limits)were industrial users in accordance with the promulgated for each permitted discharger,with Environmental Protection Agency's(EPA) compliance based on the results of samples definition.The Districts'pretreatment program collected at each discharger's facility and average includes permitting,inspection,monitoring and water usage.As part of this initial effort and the enforcement elements to ensure that the enforcement of mass emission rate limits, environment and public health are protected. pemdtees were required to install flow restrictors alanCed or control valves to ensure wastewater reduction, Environmental Management and to prevent the company from achieving compliance by dilution.Pemuttees' facilities were As part of its commitment to environmental inspected and checked for water conservation management,the Districts have adopted and are control equipment at least annually. implementing a 30-year plan of action called Additionally,through pemtitting and "2020 Vision".This plan integrates research, enforcement activities,the Districts promoted and facilities planning,environmental analysis,toxics implemented good housekeeping practices and control,water conservation and reclamation, installation of waste minimization equipment. sludge reuse,and other innovative programs and This included the implementation of waste financial planning into a single unified approach. segregation and the installation of dmgout tanks, Activities to control tuxics from entering the spray rinses and flow restrictors.As a result, sewerage system include aggressive source industries discovered that these practices reduced . control to minimize discharges of toxic waste, the volume of waste generated,and created promotion of waste minimization and safe economic incentives in the form of Iowa pretreatment and sewer use charges. In September 1989,as part of the revisions to requirements.The Districts require that each the Districts' Wastewater Discharge Regulations, industry fill out the checklist,and implement provisions were incorporated that established those techniques that are found to be technically - pollution prevention requirements.In essence, and economically feasible. these provisions required all users to provide In addition to these enforcement-related waste minimization plans to conserve water, activities,the Districts have also participated in investigate new technology,provide inventory technical outreach efforts for the industrial - control,implement educational and training community.The Districts have organized activities,and take any other steps needed to workshops in cooperation with the University of minimize waste.This policy was in keeping with California on Industrial Wastewater Treatment EPA's January 1989 Pollution Prevention Policy and Waste Reduction,'and have sponsored a - Statement,which called for state and local workshop on"Switching From Solvents to governments to play a primary role in Water-Based Cleaning Processes."Districts'staff encouraging the implementation of waste also routinely meets with industry trade mimmizstion and environmentally sound associations to discuss waste minimization - recycling pmeticw. requirements and to promote waste reduction. The Districts have adopted a two-tiered For the second tier,the Districts intend to approach to improve industrial pollution expand the program to consider cross-media and prevention practices.The first tier of the approach nonindustrial pollution prevention options.The - utilizes enforcement requirements to implement scope of the program will be broadened by pollution prevention.Waste minimization incorporating pollution prevention in all souce requirements me incorporated into enforcement control aspects such as permitting and monitoring. actions taken against noncompliant industries The first step will consist of an extensive source - through the issuance of written enforcement survey and educational outreach program for orders.As part of these actions,companies me industry.Implementation tools will be developed required to conduct waste minimization such as alternative enforcement mechanisms, assessments and submit waste minimization permit assessments,and pollution prevention assessment reports.Descriptions of proven waste incentives.The Districts will coordinate their minimization techniques,their applications and program with other agencies and cooperate with benefits,and a waste minimization checklist are the industrial community.The goal is to create a provided to industries for their use.Also,as part partnership with industry to implement poMution - of this approach,a Districts'engineer is sent to prevention throughout the Districts' service area. each industry to review the industry's As part of the program,a series of technical and manufacturing processes,assess waste educational workshops will be held,and"ad-hoc" minimization opportunities,and answer any committees will be established.Small industrial - questions about the checklist and the Districts' sources and commercial dischargers will be made part of the pollution prevention effort - through a program of incentives and educational metals have met the Districts' National Pollutant outreach. Discharge Elimination System(NPDES) discharge standards. Since the program began, .Results ''1, over 95%of the metal finishers and other As a result of the Districts'Pollution federally regulated industries have installed flow Prevention Program,significant environmental restrictors or control valves to reduce wastewater improvements have been achieved.Over the past usage,or have installed basic waste minimization five years,the quantity of industrial wastewater equipment to reduce the volume of hazardous flow tributary to the Districts' sewerage system wastes and wastewaters discharged to the has been reduced by 50%.In addition,influent Districts' sewerage system. heavy metals have been reduced by approximately 50%.The reduction in toxics has been so effective that for the last three years,the influent heavy POLLUTION PREVENTION BEATS THE STANDARDS oa Oaf GQeg �� 2`�fi 5` Va°hu O�yg I w J /e of Me 7.9% 9% 17.3% 7.9% 26.5% 26.3% 23% 0%• 0%' allowable s andard Permosoble Dschaga �imil 0 Acfual D,acharge � ta+r. may daienaely amo�ms The amount of tonics in the final effluent falls well below what is considered safe as specified in the Districts'NPDES ocean discharge pemit issued by state andfederal agencies. ► ► ► ► County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O.Bar 8127 Fountain Valley,California 92728 REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN MAY 13 , 1992 v/ 1 ) PRESENTATION OF DISTRICTS' PINS TO NEW BOARD MEMBERS . THOMAS SALTARELLI: REPRESENTING THE CITY OF TUSTIN ON DISTRICT 1 . NOTE: TOM'S BROTHER , DON SALTARELLI, WAS A LONG TIME MEMBER OF THE SANITATION DISTRICTS' BOARD , ALSO REPRESENTING TUSTIN, AND WAS JOINT CHAIRMAN FROM 1977 - 1979. DON MCALLISTER: WHO IS AN ALTERNATE DIRECTOR REPRESENTING THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON ,r BEACH ON DISTRICT NO . 11 , SITTING IN TONIGHT FOR JACK KELLY WHO IS RECOVERING FROM HEART BYPASS SURGERY. NOTE: DON WAS AN ACTIVE MEMBER OF THE SANITATION DISTRICTS' BOARDS DURING A PRIOR STINT ON THE CITY COUNCIL AND SERVED FROM THE LATE 1970'S INTO THE MID-1980'S ON THE BOARDS. -ITEM 2 ON NEXT PAGE- 2) ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION FOR RETIRING DIRECTOR EDGAR . AS THE BOARD MEMBERS ARE AWARE, WITH THE RECENT REORGANIZATION OF THE TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL , DIRECTOR DICK EDGAR IS RETIRING FROM THE BOARDS. DICK SERVED ON THE BOARDS FOR 12 YEARS . AT ONE POINT OR ANOTHER HE SERVED ON VIRTUALLY EVERY BOARD COMMITTEE; AND WAS JOINT CHAIRMAN IN 1984 AND 1985. INTRODUCE RESOLUTION NO . 92-38 COMMENDING RICHARD B. EDGAR FOR HIS OUTSTANDING CONTRIBUTIONS AND DEDICATION TO PUBLIC SERVICE UPON HIS RETIREMENT AS A DIRECTOR OF THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS. -ITEM 3 ON NEXT PAGE- 3) PRESENTATION OF PRIDE SUGGESTION AWARDS AND CERTIFICATES . '-� AT ITS LAST MEETING, THE FISCAL POLICY APPROVED EIGHT PRIDE COST SAVING OR SAFETY SUGGESTION AWARDS TO EMPLOYEES TOTALING $5.693 . 00. TONIGHT WE WOULD LIKE TO RECOGNIZE THREE OF THE EMPLOYEES WHO RECEIVED A MAXIMUM $1500 AMOUNT FOR THEIR SUGGESTIONS. WE WOULD LIKE TO ASK THEIR DEPARTMENT HEADS AND THE THREE EMPLOYEES TO COME FORWARD. THE DEPARTMENT HEADS WILL INTRODUCE THE AWARD WINNING EMPLOYEES AND GIVE A BRIEF SUMMARY OF THEIR SUGGESTIONS. A . DEPARTMENT HEAD, BOB OOTEN, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS 1 . EMPLOYEE, DAVE HEINZ: PRIDE NO. 177 - MATERIAL DISPOSAL REDUCTION. 2. EMPLOYEE, PETER BROWN: PRIDE NO . 188 - REDUCTION OF FERROUS CHLORIDE USAGE. B . DEPARTMENT HEAD, ED HODGES , DIRECTOR OF MAINTENANCE 1 . EMPLOYEE, GLEN RIPLEY: PRIDE NO. 204 - COMPUTER ROOM HVAC ENERGY SAVINGS -ITEM 4 ON NEXT PAGE- 4) PRESENTATION OF A RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO TED FINSTER , RETIRING STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL �. BOARD MEMBER . ORANGE COUNTY'S TED FINSTER HAS RECENTLY RETIRED FROM THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD. MR . FINSTER IS A RESIDENT OF NEWPORT BEACH. HE HAS SPENT HIS ENTIRE CAREER IN WATER AND WASTEWATER ENGINEERING BEGINNING IN 1948 WITH THE ORANGE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT . MR . FINSTER PLAYED A KEY ROLE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SANITATION DISTRICTS' BACKBONE TRUNK SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM EXPANSION IN THE 1950' AND 60's WHILE VICE PRESIDENT OF A MAJOR CONSULTING ENGINEERING FIRM HEADQUARTERED IN ORANGE COUNTY . PRESENT RESOLUTION NO. 92-37, PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED BY THE BOARDS , TO MR . FINSTER IN RECOGNITION OF HIS TREMENDOUS CONTRIBUTION TO THE FIELD OF WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT. —ITEM 5 ON NEXT PAGE— 5) UPCOMING MEETINGS A. AD HOC COMMITTEE RE LAND USE - THE AD HOC COMMITTEE RE LAND USE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY, MAY 20TH , AT 4:30 P. M . B . FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY , MAY 20TH AT 5:30 P . M . C . BUILDING COMMITTEE - THE BUILDING COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON THURSDAY , MAY 21ST , AT 5:30 P . M . D . SPECIAL JOINT WORKS SELECTION COMMITTEE RE OCEAN MONITORING - THE SPECIAL JOINT WORKS SELECTION COMMITTEE RE OCEAN MONITORING IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY , MAY 27TH , AT 4:30 P . M . , IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING . E . EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE/FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - THE EXECUTIVE AND FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEES ARE SCHEDULED TO MEET JOINTLY ON WEDNESDAY , MAY 27TH , AT 5:30 P . M . F. SPECIAL JOINT WORKS SELECTION COMMITTEE RE COMPUTERS - THE SPECIAL JOINT WORKS SELECTION COMMITTEE RE COMPUTERS IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON THURSDAY, MAY 28TH , AT 5:00 P . M . G . DEBT FINANCING WORKSHOP - A DEBT FINANCING WORKSHOP HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR WEDNESDAY , JUNE 3RD , AT 5:30 P . M . -END OF REPORT- MEEnNGDATE May 13, 1992 RYE 7:30 P.M. DI,T=n 1,2,3,5,6,7, 11, 13 6 14 DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS (RI RDSON) .CORISET . . . . . ✓ (BEYER). . . . . .. ... . . . . .sARRIJi11. .. . ✓ — (BEYER) . . . . .CBARRERA. . . .]�!! (HORSY). . . . . .. ... .. . . .DAnN . . . . .✓ _ (PO ms) . . . sALTARElLI . .JG (SCOTT) . .. . ......... . .COLLNS . .. .J� — ` (ROTM . . . . . . sTANTON . . . ..EG (PLUMMIER) .. . . . . . . . — (FERAYMAM. . . WAHNER . . . .✓ MAD E .. .... ........ . .CULM ... ._� \ / (BELL) .. . ........... ..DENIES .. ...JC — \� DISTRICT2 (NE].SOR) . ... ........ ..DUMN .. .. ✓ — SIDW ERI . . PICKLER ....Q (HDNTER) . ........... ..ENILLE .....�_ — WNTE . . . . .(PIMERccuums ....T (RICE) . . . ........... ..* R ....._i — (SEVER) . . . . . BAMEW....47 6"HONEY1..... .... .. . .ROW .. ... — WOR6n . . . . . .TLN .... .Ae— McCUNE) . .. . .... ... . . . .— — . . .. . . (RICHARDSO14... .. .. . . . .WORISEST.. ..MET .. ...t — (BELL) OENEB .... .✓ — (0.0RA) YAICFEY .. .lG (WEDM) . . .. ... . . . . . . .OULLIXSM . .J� — (CULVQS .... MMI. . .... .lG — (PLU ISTE .... . . . . . . . .HARE ..... .JL — (PARKER) ... . NELSON.... . (MeLSCM TEW ... . . .. . . . JINN. .... . (WILSCPR . ...... ...... .LA830. . ...JC — TYNES) (GRISEI . ... . NEWTON (RLVER) . ..... ....... .MA1p .. .. .JL ( .. ... . PULIOO .. .. .jE (RI L R) . ... ......... .MAN .. . ...JC (ROTH)ROTR) . . . .. . STANTON. . . .Y (HERMA). ........... . .MM9US.. ....-le roIALI%SQR . .�WEDMCxxY.IL (HERMAIfI. ........... . .NNER. . .....Ige DISTRICT (PARKER) .... ........ . .NELSON .. _ (DOTSON) . . . .(SAPIEN . ... .✓ (MES) . .. . ......... . .NEVrtQ! . . . . — (NELSOR . . . l DMA.V. .... (DUN AP) . .. . .. . ..... . .PARKER . . . .J--f — — (HORBY) . . . . . DAnN .....AA_� IAOEI . . .... ........ . .PARTIN . . .. .JL — — ISCOTT) . . . . COU NP.S ....� (HUNTER) ... . ........ . .P .. i — MANI . . . . . . C(A.VER.... .✓ (HART).. . . .......... — (RI . . . . . . . ... . ✓ (PUCIWM . ........ MAHONEY) . . . FLORA. . .... V (MTMEM4.......... ..PDf%ER. . . ._)G W9 E) . . . . GRTFPN. ... .Ai (GMSET) .. .......... ..PU . . . . .� MP • ' _ DML30M. . . . . L O . . .. .L — — OWDO) .. .......... ..RMINRDSCN .Y — (RIOIAROsOM . Dumm .. .le (STANTCNI . .... ....... MITI.. . . . . . — (HERMM) . . . . . . ....✓- (PONTTOU9). .... — (AGE) . . . . . . . PAMM .....JG (LOUD .. . . ...... ... . . .SANSONE . ..Je _ _ MWER) . . . . P1M6o1 ....— (DOTSON). . ...... ... . ..s EN . . . ..JL — — (ROBITAILLE) . . SAMA ...... a (HAMMpIp). ... ::::: .- (DATES) . . . _ IROTM . . . . . . SMNICM....� (ROBRALLE) . . . ... SSVA . . . . . . CV — — . . . . . MVR . ... .JC IPDRS . .. . . . . ...... . .STANTCN. . . ..le — DISTRICTS (M01ER). .. . . . . ...... . .MAN. . . . . .Jg — �/ (DART) . . . . . .�PLLSO.IER.... ✓ (DATES) . .. . . . . ..... . . .SWMA . . ...JC (FERRYMNOSIQRRMKMEADE) .WNNER .. ..✓ _ (STAWONI- . . . JiBR4... ...f ((]ULLm. . . . . . . .... . .WEDAA . . ... LC — (CO%) . . . . . . 4SAN90NE. ...IC QM TOwPATTERsOT4 . . . . .WNCNN.L . .._lge— — DISTRICTS (SHERRICK) . . JWAHNER . ... ✓ m . OTHER (STANTON). . . . .. .. .�G — (PLUMMER) . . &HART .. . .. . sVLVESTER.. .... ✓ WWDRUFF . ._r BROWN .... .... ✓ ANWM . . . . .— DISTRICTT ANDERSON.. .... .✓ OFADR. . . . . .— (READE) . . . . .4tWAHNER . .... LiANSCN....... .A a REMNO . . . .— (BEYER) . . . . . SAMERA...... DAWES ....... . JAB NONENER . . ._ (RUMMER) . . . SR). . . . . . .JC OO CA..... . — HOUGH . . . . . (SALTmalm HAsEN m .... . .A I10WAR0 ... .JAC mWDO) . . . . . RIgIMDsLN .L NODOEs ....... J[! FRRR ...... ✓ (STANTON). . . . AYIAI. . . . .. V MBE. . ........ _K INWF .....J� PIAMMOIID) . . . LNDER . . . .... . JC LEE ..... . .— DISTRICT 11 NELLOR . .. ..... — LND81110Y . .— SApI1LTOf4 NELSON. . ...... > LYNCH ... . .— PATTERSON) . <WNCHEl1 . . . ✓ MOHCLS ....... SWW......— S" tsTER) GNLsrA. .....�r OOTEH . ....... STOFE .....� (ROTM . . . . . . STANTON..... RENESCU....... WABW.....— SNPSON ....... YOIWL . . . ..— DISTRICTI3 STREED ........ � (1 (HUNTER) . . . . EHRLE. ..... _ _ VNCEIR . �TyV :bi*A� _ (BEYER) . . . . �BAMM. WINSOR.... .. . . ✓ (YVEDAA) . . . . 1GULLMSON — _ (DUN-AM . . . . PAexu. . . . . ✓ �Y- - (STANfOM. . . . NeM'. . . . ..�� DISTRICT I6 Q MNWy�+ MELER) . . . . .CSV/M . .....��— u ^- ( N . . . SWIIBMI ...� fiTNM ( . . . . (PUMEBEYER .T) . . . .(PCNfOUs (STANTON) RBSM�. ... S� /�'IA i/.. �iA Un I{i• 5/13/92 JOINT MEETING NOTES #3 - Receive and file minute excerpts �J JC: Receive and file minute excerpts for the City of Tustin. Any comments? Any opposition? Seeing none, it will be deemed approved. #4 - Annual Elections of District Chairman and Chairman pro tem DISTRICT 1 - Dan Griset nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. Fred Barrera nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. DISTRICT 2 - Henry W. Wedaa nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. John Collins nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. DISTRICT 3 - Sal A. Sapien nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that nomTnations be closed. Burnie Dunlap nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. DISTRICT 5 - Ruthelyn Plummer nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. Don Roth and Phil Sansone nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. Directors voted by a show of hands. Phil Sansone elected Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 6 - James Wahner nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. Evelyn Hart nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. `.� DISTRICT 7 - Charles Puckett nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. James Wahner nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. DISTRICT 11 - Grace Winchell nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. Jack Kelly nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. DISTRICT 13 - John Gullixson nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. Fred Barrera nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. DISTRICT 14 - Peer Swan nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. Leslie Pontious nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. #7a Report of the Joint Chairman The Joint Chairman welcomed recently-seated Director Thomas Saltarelli to the Boards and presented a pin bearing the Districts' logo to him as well as to Director Don MacAllister who sat in for Director Jack Kelly who is recovering from heart bypass surgery. Director MacAllister commented that Director Kelly is now at home, doing well and will be recuperating for 4 to 6 weeks. Also presented with pins were Margie Rice who sat in for Jim Evans and Barry Hammond who sat in for Sally Anne Sheridan. The pins are similar to the service pins d..✓ given to employees and recognize the Directors for their service on the Board of the Sanitation Districts. -1- The Joint Chairman announced that due to a recent reorganization of the Tustin City Council , Director Dick Edgar is retiring from the Boards. Chairman Mahoney then introduced a resolution expressing the Boards' appreciation to him and recognizing his outstanding contributions and dedication to public service. Presentation of PRIDE suggestion awards and certificates JC: It's my honor and privelege to be able to present to our employees that achieve the highest PRIDE awards. There are certificates and checks. I am very proud and would like these people to come forward and have you get to see our employees who are spending their time and energy and efforts and are coming up with some very cost savings ideas for the Sanitation Districts. This evening we have three people who will receive the maximum amounts ($1500.00) that we can present to them through the PRIDE awards. We would like for the department heads to came forward and introduce them and I 'll first have Bob Ooten come up who is the Director of Operations and introduce the two employees that he has. B. Ooten: I would like to tell you a little bit about why we are giving these awards to Dave Heinz and Peter Brown. Dave recommends installation of a device called Helical Screw Press which squeezes water out of rags at the bar screens which are taken to the land fills paid by weight or by load. By utilizing the screw press, we' ll save both on the number of loads and on the amount we pay for loads. We estimate this to be a savings of approximately $40,000. Peter Brown developed a process that reduces the chemicals. ---------- We estimate that this procedure saves us $100,000. For that I recommend Supervisor Heinz and ---- Operator Brown ------. JC: Dave, thank you very much for your contribution to the Districts. I am going to make an official recognition in appreciation award to you for your contribution. Evelyn has the money. Congratulations. Peter, we appreciate your contributions and it's through employees like yourself that we become a more efficient operation. So again thank you very much for your contributions. Here's a little memento of your achievement and Evelyn has what really counts. Now I would like to introduce Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance who will introduce the employee from his department who is also to receive the maximum award this evening. E. Hodges: Mr. Chairman, Mr. Ripley is an electrical technician for the maintenance department and has been working with us for about 3 years. Mr. Ripley specializes in heating and building an airconditioning system. He found that in his normal servicing of this building here that the computer room that services our finance computer was requiring tremendous amount of ---- but by putting in ------- unit to service that building, we could turn off that more larger unit that services the majority of this building, thereby saving- this agency approximately $23,000 a year. Mr. Chairman, it's my pleasure to introduce Glen Ripley. JC: Here is a token of our recognition and Evelyn has what counts. Thank you very much. -2- ` I think these three gentlemen just point up to what we' re all very fortunate to have with us and that is good qualified employees that are always looking for a cost cutting way to save us all some money. It helps them out in a way that they earn through the PRIDE program and basically we look pretty good because the cost our constituents stays down so you heard we saved quite a bit of money '�✓ through these three men and we thank them. Now I want you to know they weren't the only ones that got PRIDE awards. We gave out several in the last couple of months so these were just the ones that received the maximum. Presentation of a Resolution of A reciation to Ted Finster, retiring State Water Resources Control Board Member JC: This evening I would like to make a presentation of a resolution of appreciation to Ted Finster, retiring State Water Resources Control Board Member. Ted Finster has recently retired from the State Water Resources Control Board. He is a resident of Newport Beach. He has spent his entire career in water and wastewater engineering beginning in 1948 with the Orange County Health Department. Mr. Finster played a key role in the development of the Sanitation Districts' backbone trunk sewer collection system expansion in the 1950 and 60's while Vice President of a major consulting engineering firm headquartered in Orange County. This evening I 'm going to present Resolution 92-37, previously adopted by the Boards, to Mr. Finster in recognition of his tremendous contribution to the field of wastewater management. Ted, would you come up please. Ted, we are very happy to make this presentation to you. We certainly appreciate your contributions in wastewater management in the county. I want to personally thank you. Rather than read all of this, I would like to just say thank you very much. Ted Finster: I really appreciate the honor of receiving this. It brings back alot of memories. I attended many of these meetings, actually when the office was out of West 8th Street which is now Civic Center Drive and religiously met every month and things still haven't changed. The railroad still runs through there. I want to say that 1 hope that the things I did were benefical to you and I know there were things that the Board did that you didn't like and there probably are going to be more. With that I would like to thank you again for your concern and recognition. Thank you very much. Upcoming Meetings JC: Announcements of a few upcoming meetings. The Ad Hoc committee meeting for land use is scheduled to meet on Wednesday, May 20th, at 4:30 p.m. Fiscal Policy Committee is scheduled for Wednesday, May 20th, at 5:30 p.m. Building Committee is scheduled Thursday, May 21st, at 5:30 p.m. Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Ocean Monitoring is scheduled to meet on Wednesday, May 27th, at 4:30 p.m., immediately preceding the Executive Committee. -3- ' The Executive Committee and Fiscal Policy Committee is meeting on Wednesday, May 27th, at 5:30 p.m. Special Joint Works Selection Committee on computers is meeting on Thursday, May 28th, at 5:00 p.m. There will be a Debt Financing Workshop on Wednesday, June 3rd, at 5:30 p.m. Wayne will have a little bit more to say about that as to specifically what it is and how it may help new Directors but possibly us oldtimers as well . That concludes my report. Report of the General Manager JWS: Each of you should have received since the last Joint Board Meeting a report that I prepare for you quarterly on the status of the Master Plan Facilities, Improvements and Extensions. Just in summary, we currently have $60 million worth of new facilities in the planning stage, $227 million under design and $224 under construction. That totals $511 million in various stages of progress. As you recall the 30 year Master Plan adopted by the Boards calls for facilities, improvements of $1.5 billion over the term of the plan between 1990 and 2020. That's in 1989 dollars. Considering inflation, we expect to spend a total of about $2.8 billion before we' re through. Last month I reported to you that the Districts had received the EPA Region 9 Pollution Prevention Award. I 'm pleased to advised you tonight that EPA Ci A n stra o Ri+ey has announced that we have received the national award for our Pollution Prevention Program. There is a summary in your folders this evening of our program. As a matter of fact, our Source Control Manager, Margie Nellor is in Washington D.C. today and Administrator R+3ey.presented her with the award a couple of hours ago. Y �.s On the subject of awards, last month we also received an award on our general Information video that most of you have seen, titled "Planning With Vision". Congratulations to Corinne Clawson, our Public Information Officer for that. Item 13(b)(2) on your agenda tonight is to approve extending our participation in the *Think Earth* Environmental Education Consortium which we participate with 13 other firms and governmental agencies in Southern California. This is an educational program on the environment for kindergarten through 6th grade. You will be interested to know that the South Coast Air Quality Management District presented that program with an award at their award ceremony in the last couple of weeks for their efforts. Finally, J�-Mah oaey mentioned the Debt Financing Workshop. In your folder tonight is a pink sheet that briefly summarizes what that workshop is about. The $1.5 billion facilities expansion program that I mentioned earlier is going to be financed by combination of debt financing and sewer connection fees on new development. It roughly breaks down by about half and half. Because of that mayor debt financing program, we've conducted debt financing workshops for new Directors in the past. Since the last workshop, we've had several new board members and so this workshop is designed specifically to inform the new Directors of our program, we encourage all Directors to attend and participate. We would appreciate it very much, because we do serve dinner at the beginning of the meeting, if you would fill out this form whether or not you plan to attend and leave it in your folder tonight. -4- ` #7(c) - Report of the General Counsel TLW: I don't have much more on the Montrose litigation. However, it is resurfacing. On Monday of this week the Federal Judge assigned to the case did approve a consent decree involving two of the eight corporate defendants. That decision will clearly be taken upon appeal. In terms of our status, it's moving again once more a proposed new consent decree to settle out all of the public agencies is circulating around and there is a settlement conference this coming week on Tuesday and Wednesday and hopefully there will be some movement and some effort on the part of the federal government to make it happen to get the local agencies and most notably, the Orange County entities out of the lawsuit. That's about all I can tell you at this point. #12(b) (6) - Opposing requirement for disclosure of ex parte requirements Director Wedaa: (Penny, did you get any of this? I can't understand any of his comments.) JC: Rule 111 is the AQMD SP 1328 is the legislation driving Rule 111. While the AQMD has done away with Rule 111 we still need to be aware of 1328 and as Wayne pointed out this evening the resolution is drafted in such a form that we can use it for both SP 1328 and Rule 111. It will be forwarded after this vote this evening to Sacramento so they will know how we do this. Any further comments or questions? Deemed approved. Director Stanton abstained on Items #12(b)(3)(a)(b)(c). #12(b)(7) - Dedicating revenues for payment of obligations JC: On Item #12(b)(7) I would like to have a motion and a second from each of the Districts on the matters set out there on the resolutions. They were all deemed approved by unanimous consent. (CLOSED SESSION) #25(a) - Memory Lane Interceptor (Staff Report) TND: This project, the Memory Lane Interceptor was bid a few weeks ago and we received 8 bids. The bids ranged from $5.4 million to a low of under $3.472 million. This project was a fast-tracked effort between the Sanitation Districts 1 and 2 and the Cities of Orange and Santa Ana. It is a joint venture funded by all four of those public agencies. The sewer begins at the Santa River and extends easterly at Memory Lane which is Garden Grove Boulevard, under the 5 Freeway and Owens Drive near Main Place Shopping Center and to Parker Street under the 22 Freeway to La Vets Avenue where it goes west and intersects Flo and Batavia Streets. This 2% mile sewer accomplishes many goals. The first is by intersecting this flow at Batavia and Le Veta, it relieves a District 2 sewer in La Vets which was overloaded so it makes that sewer ----- so that it won't have to be replaced. The second thing for the Sanitation Districts is it preserves capacity in District 1 sewers in Main Street and Bristol Street. Finally, it alleviates the needs for the Cities of Orange and Santa Ana to build some very costly sewers. By this cost sharing project all of the agencies involved save money. -5- The actions tonight are to approve two addendums. Addenda 1 included some schedule changes which were actually requested at a public meeting that we held with the business owners along the route and this request came from Main Place. We had a rescheduling of work on Owens Drive to best meet their needs. Addenda 2 simply moved the date of receipt of bids. The action also includes tonight the award to the low bidder, Mladen Buntich Construction Co. Director Catlin: Why is there such a wide disparity in the bids, such a wide range in the dollar amounts? TMD: The bottom three bids were relatively close together and then there was a huge jump to the next five bids. The bottom three bids by Mladen Buntich, Davies and Colich are all contractors who have a long history of working with us and all three are excellent contractors and know us very well. I think that they were just in need of a job and felt that they could do it for us for this price. Most of the companies in the second half are companies that haven't done alot of work for us and I think were just kind of "long-shoting" this project hoping they would get in with a good bid. Director: This project will be moved into the City of Orange for about SM years, right in the middle of town. Can you give me a name of someone that will be overseeing the project so that if I get a complaint I can call so I don't have to come to you. TMD: We will do that. We will also give to your police department, fire department and all your city's staff a complete list of contractor names; our inspector in-charge right down to my home phone number. We make that available to the bus companies, to everybody involved, every public utility. As we start work we will write letters and walk them as the work progresses to each home and business along the route two weeks before the contractor actually moves in. These letters give them 24 hour numbers where they can reach us so they won't be calling your city. We hope that will take the pressure off your cities. Director: Maybe you should add all the council members? Director McGuigan: As an outsider, I have a comment. Should have all the council members advised of any scheduling going on and make sure that they are aware. TMD: We will do that. I might also add we did have public meetings on this. In Santa Ana we had over 100 people turn out for our night meeting that we had on this. We have mailed to every residence out there already. Director: We have found that in alot of sewer work that it behooves advertising with a large sign at the intersections of the work being done. They like to see those signs. TMD: We have that in our contract. The signs will be up and they all say Orange County Sanitation District. The sign that we have says something about "clean water program for sanitary sewer". This project actually is a very detailed scheduled project. We have large penalties ($1,500 a day) built into this contract to assure that the contractor will maintain schedules. Director: How far ahead of construction will they put the signs up? TMD: They will put them up about a week ahead; as we move from spot to spot. Anything longer than that, they don't do alot of goad. -6- #28 - Baker-Gisler Interceptor TMD: This is the last in a series of actions that you have taken on this project regarding Supplement No. 2, revision or addition to our EIR work. This job has been going on for a number of years and it started before the formation of District 14. In the formation of District 14 it was noted that we had to build a large new connector sewer to bring water from the City of Irvine to the Cities of Tustin, Costa Mesa and Santa Ana. We needed a large joint sewer to do that. There have been a couple of other actions in CEQA. We had Supplement No. 1 which modified the size of the routing and this Supplement No. 2 came about because of a condemnation of an easement that is needed. We need to condemn an easement through the Mesa Verde Golf Course, just on the east side of the Santa Ana River. Mesa Verde has fought that acquisition of the easement and in one of their actions they went into court to challenge our EIR. I believed they challenged it on 31 counts and they won on 2. The District won on 29 so to address those 2 counts, Supplement No. 2 was prepared. You received the draft supplement and authorized its distribution about two months ago. Last month you held the required public hearing and as you recall , there was one response to that hearing. In total we have received three comments on Supplement No. 2. The three comments were written comments from the State of California (two of them) and one from the City of Costa Mesa. That together with the oral comments received at the public hearing constitutes the response that we received. The items that are addressed in this EIR are two-fold. Number 1, Mesa was concerned with their access to Gisler after the sewer is built and even after another project takes place which is the proposed for the planned bridge over the Santa River which would connect Garfield and Gisler. By the way, the City of Costa Mesa does not support that bridge. However, in this Supplement No. 2 the issue of access was addressed very thoroughly and the supplement points out that they will be able to maintain access during construction and after the construction. The second issue raised was the monitoring program. The District had adopted an EIR monitoring program to insure that our design and our construction followed the mitigation ---- that you approved when you approve an EIR. The monitoring program in effect was the program that was adopted as a part of our overall master plan. Mesa said that we should have a separate monitoring program specifically for this project and one was received and if you approve, will be adopted tonight. Those were the only issues of concern in this supplement. Everything else that was addressed In earlier EIR' s and supplements remain in effect. Tonight there are several actions. First of all , there was a consideration of a motion to receive and file the comments received after the public hearing. There were none. Second of all , there is a motion to receive a Staff Summary which I have just summarized for you. Finally, there are motions to approve the EIR and adopt a resolution which certifies the EIR. -7- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 19 2, 39 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON MAY 139 1992 PHYATIpN r `op.limo 01plT D • Pi O w i i pA u m pR Saea 195 ty RAGE CGV ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA REVISED ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on May 13, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts- Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Distrtcts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S. 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: x Dan Griset, Chairman Robert Richardson x Fred Barrera, Chairmen pro in —Gene Beyer x _ Thomas R. Saltare111 _Leslie A. Pontious a Roger Stanton Don R. Roth a James A. Wahner _James Ferryman DISTRICT NO. 2: x Henry W. Wedaa, Chairman _John M. Gulltxson x John Collins, Chairman pro ten George Scott —x--Fred Barrera —Gene Beyer =Buck Catlin —_Chris Norby =Barry Denes Bob Bell =William D. Mahoney —_ rm James H. Flora =Robert H. Main —Glenn Culver _Garrey J. Nelson Glenn Parker a Arthur G. Newton —John 0. Tynes a Iry Pickier —Fred Hunter =Miguel Pulido —Dan Griset x Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 3: x Sal A. Sapien, Chairman Harry M. Dotson x Burnie Dunlap. Chairman pro tea —Carrey J. Nelson 7--Buck Catlin —_Chris Moray x John Collins _George Scott =Norman Culver Robert H. Main James V. Evans xMargie L. Rice x James H. Flora William D. Mahoney a Don R. Griffin —Rhonda J. McCune a Frank Laszlo —_Edna Wilson r..� a Pat McGuigan Robert Richardson =Eva G. Miner —Larry Herman a Richard Partin —_Cecilia L. Age 7—Iry Pickier _Fred Hunter a Jim Silva _Earle Robitaille a Roger Stanton Don R. Roth x Charles Sylvia —Ronald Bates DISTRICT NO. 5: x Ruthelyn PI unmer, Chairman Evelyn Hart —x—Phil Sansone, Chairman pro tem —John C. Cox. Jr. _Don R. Roth =Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 6: x James A. Wahner, Chairman Dick Sherrick =Evelyn Hart, Chairman pro tem —Ruthelyn Plummer -Don R. Roth x Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 7: x Charles E. Puckett, Chai man Thomas R. Saltarelli =James A. Wanner, Chairman pro tem —Nate Reade =Fred Barrera —Gene Beyer John C. Cox, Jr. x Ruthelyn Plummer =Robert Richardson _Miguel Pulido Don R. Roth x Roger Stanton _Sally Anne Sheridan =Barry Hammond DISTRICT NO. 11: x Grace Winchell, Chairman Linda Moulton-Patterson Jack Kelly, Chairman pro tan x Don MacAllister =Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 13: x John M. Gullixson, Chairman _Henry W. Wachs xFred Barrera, Chairman pro tem _Gene Beyer a William D. Ehrle _Fred Hunter =Glenn Parker Burnie Dunlap _Don R. Roth x Roger Stanton `rrrw' DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chairman _Darryl Miller =Leslie A. Pontious, Chairman pro tem Charles E. Puckett =Fred Barrera —Gene Beyer Don R. Roth xRoger Stanton _Sally Anne Sheridan x Barry Hammnd -2- 05/13/92 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita Brown, Board Secretary, Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle, Peter Brown, Corrine Clawson, Gary Hasenstab, Dave Heinz, Ed Hodges, John Linder, Charles Nichols, Bob Ooten, Adriana Renescu, Glen Ripley, Mary Simpson, Mahin Talebi , Chuck Winsor OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel , Ted Finster, Walt Howard, Harvey Hunt, Bill Knopf, Phil Stone DISTRICTS i 7 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: eceive and 7 e minute excerp re Board Appointments That the minute excerpt from the City of Tustin re election of mayor and appointment of alternate Directors, and seating new members of the Boards, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows: (*Mayor) District Active Director Alternate Director 1 Thomas R. Saltarelli Leslie A. Pontious* 7 Charles E. Puckett Thomas R. Saltarelli 14 Leslie A. Pontious* Charles E. Puckett DISTRICT 1 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman hairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1. It was then moved: That Director Dan Griset be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Griset as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Fred Barrera be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Barrera as Chairman pro tem. */ -3- 05/13/92 DISTRICT 2 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2. It was then moved: That Director Henry W. Wedaa be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Wedaa as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director John Collins be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Collins as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 3 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chai man and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3. It was then moved: That Director Sal A. Sapien be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Sapien as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Burnie Dunlap be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot J for Director Dunlap as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 5 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5. It was then moved: That Director Ruthelyn Plummer be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Plummer as Chairman. It was further moved: That Directors Don R. Roth and Phil Sansone be nominated as candidates for the office of Chairman pro tem. The vote was then polled by a show of hands, following which the Secretary announced that Director Sansone had been elected Chairman pro tem. -4- 05/13/92 DISTRICT 6 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6. It was then moved: That Director James A. Wahner be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Wahner as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Evelyn Hart be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Hart as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 7 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7. It was then moved: That Director Charles E. Puckett be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Puckett as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director James A. Wahner be nominated for the r..i office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Wahner as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 11 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11. It was then moved: That Director Grace Winched be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Winchell as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Jack Kelly be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Kelly as Chairman pro tem. -5- 05/13/92 DISTRICT 13 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13. It was then moved: That Director John M. Gullixson be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Gullixson as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Fred Barrera be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Barrera as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 14 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14. It was then moved: That Director Peer A. Swan be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Swan as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Leslie A. Pontious be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Pontious as Chairman pro tem. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman welcomed Presentation of District pins to newly-seated Director Thomas Directors Saltarelll to the Boards. He then presented pins bearing the Districts' logo to active Director Saltarelli and to alternate Directors Don MacAllister, Barry Hammond and Margie Rice, who were representing their respective cities or agencies at this meeting. The pins are similar to the service pins given to employees and recognize the Directors for their service on the Board of the Sanitation Districts. -6- 05/13/92 ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman reported that due Adoption of resolution of to recent reorganization of the appreciation for retiring Director Tustin City Council , Director Richard Richard B. Edgar B. Edgar has retired from the Districts' Board of Directors. `- Director Edgar served on the Boards from May 1980 to April 1992 in several capacities including Joint Chairman. It was then moved, seconded and carried by unanimous acclamation: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-38, expressing their appreciation to retiring Director Richard B. Edgar and recognizing his outstanding contributions and dedication to public service. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Joint Chairman Mahoney stated that the resolution and a plaque would be presented to Director Edgar at a later date. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman briefly reviewed Presentation of PRIDE Awards to the Districts' PRIDE program which employees rewards employees for creative suggestions with an economic benefit to the Districts. He reported that at its last meeting, the Fiscal Policy Committee approved eight PRIDE cost-saving or safety suggestion awards to employees totaling $5,693.00. Chairman Mahoney then asked Bob Ooten, Assistant Director of Operations, and Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of Maintenance, to come forward and assist in the presentations of the three $1,500.00 awards (maximum award amount) to employees Dave Heinz, Peter Brown and Glen Ripley. Mr. ooten reported that Dave Heinz' suggestion, resulting in a reduction of material disposal , is estimated to save approximately $40,000.00 per year. Peter Brown's suggestion, resulting in a reduction of ferrous chloride usage, could save the Districts $117,000.00 per year. Mr. Hodges then added that Glen Ripley's suggestion would result in computer room HVAC energy savings amounting to approximately $18,000.00 per year. The Joint Chairman commended the employees for their PRIDE suggestions and presented them with their $1,500 cash awards and plaques. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman recognized Ted Presentation of resolution of Finster of Newport Beach and appreciation to Edwin H. "Ted" announced that Mr. Finster had Finster, retiring alifornia fate recently retired from the State Water Water Resources Control Board Resources Control Board. He pointed member WRCB out that he has spent his entire career in water and wastewater engineering beginning in 1948 with the Orange County Health Department. Chairman Mahoney added that Mr. Finster played a key role in the development of the Sanitation Districts' backbone trunk sewer collection system expansion in the 1950's and 1960's while vice president of a major consulting firm headquartered in Orange County. -7- 05/13/92 Joint Chairman Mahoney, assisted by Vice Joint Chairman Hart, then presented the previously-adopted resolution of appreciation to Mr. Finster and congratulated him on his tremendous contribution in the field of wastewater management. Mr. Finster commented on his involvement with the Districts over the past many years and expressed his appreciation for the honor and recognition. He added that he hoped his work with the SWRCB benefited the Districts and other wastewater agencies. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman reported that the Report of the Joint Chairman Ad Hoc Committee regarding land use was scheduled to meet on Wednesday, May 20th, at 4:30 p.m. , He added that the Fiscal Policy Committee would also meet on Wednesday, May 20th, at 5:30 p.m. Chairman Mahoney noted that the Building Committee was scheduled to meet on Thursday, May 21st, at 5:30 p.m. He then announced that the Special Joints Works Selection Committee regarding ocean monitoring would meet on Wednesday, May 27th, at 4:30 p.m., immediately preceding the Executive Committee. He further stated that the Executive Committee and Fiscal Policy Committee would meet jointly on Wednesday, May 27th, at 5:30 p.m. The Joint Chairman also announced that the Special Joint Works Selection Committee regarding computers would meet on Thursday, May 28th, at 5:30 p.m. ..� Chairman Mahoney then advised that a Debt Financing Workshop for Directors would be held on Wednesday, June 3rd, at 5:30 p.m. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager briefly Report of the General Manager summarized the quarterly report relative to the status of master plan facilities that had been mailed to the Directors since the last Board meeting. He stated that the Districts currently have $60 million worth of new facilities in the planning stage, $227 million under design and $224 million under construction, for a total of $511 million in various stages of progress. Mr. Sylvester pointed out that the 30-year Master Plan adopted in 1989 projected that capital improvements would total $1.5 billion over the term of the Plan between 1990 and 2020. However, with inflation the Districts expect the 1989 estimated dollars to increase to $2.8 billion. The General Manager then commented that last month he reported that the Districts had received EPA's Region 9 Pollution Prevention Award. He then announced that the Districts' had also just been awarded the National Pollution Prevention Award for said pollution prevention program. Mr. Sylvester noted that the Districts' Source Control Manager, Margie Nellor, was currently in Washington, D.L. receiving this national award from William Reilly, EPA Administrator. He referred Directors to a summary included in the meeting folders that evening on the Districts' Pollution Prevention Program. -8- 05/13/92 The General Manager also reported that the Districts received an award last month from California Water Pollution Control Association for the general information video, "Planning with Vision". Mr. Sylvester then reported that the Districts participate with 13 other firms and governmental agencies in Southern California to form the "Think Earth" Environmental Education Consortium. He noted that their educational program on the environment for kindergarten through 6th grade recently received an award from the South Coast Air Quality Management District. The General Manager then announced that a debt financing workshop for Directors was scheduled to be held on June 3rd at 5:30 p.m. He requested that Directors complete the form included in their meeting folders that evening relative to their attendance so that staff could make the necessary arrangements. ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel briefly commented Report of the General Counsel on the status of litigation entitled U.S. Government v. Montrose Chemical Corp. , et al . re Santa Monica Bay damages. He stated that another settlement conference was scheduled to be held the following week. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 8, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 8, 1992, �.✓ the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 8, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 8, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 8, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the ' . regular meeting held April 8, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -9- 05/13/92 DISTRICT it There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 8, 1992, `.r the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 8, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 8, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 4108/92 4/22/92 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 669,955.61 $ 763,959.66 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund 911,968.60 3,537,778.24 Joint Working Capital Fund - 154,771.40 186,739.07 �../ Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 65,432.36 114,535.93 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 435.00 360.48 DI TRIG CT NO. 2 - 801,996.54 7,212.75 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 86,934.83 35,139.67 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 848,477.95 170,616.26 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 23.87 245.76 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 170,526.22 5,999.37 DISTRICT NO. 11 - -0- 7,368.26 DISTRICT NO. 13 - -0- 63.84 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 1,780.75 4,409.57 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 8 6 JOINT - 24,248.68 1,467.79 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 8 7 JOINT - 2,933.48 -0- DISTRICTS NOS. 7 8 14 JOINT - 395.60 7 449.98 3, 9,7 880. 9 T4,843i4i3 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase of Two Cab and Chassis, Specification That the bid tabulation and No. A-159, to GMC Truck Center recommendation re award of Purchase of Two (2) Cab and Chassis, Specification No. A-159, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to GMC Truck Center for a total amount not to exceed $30,388.00 plus sales tax. .... -10- 05/13/92 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Hewlett-Packard That staff be, and is hereby, Company for Purchase and authorized to issue a purchase order Installation of Gas to Hewlett-Packard Company in the - Chromatograph Sulfur amount of $30,440.00 plus sales tax Chemiluminescense Detector System for Purchase and Installation of Gas Specification N0. E-218 Chromatograph/Sulfur Chemiluminescense Detector System (Specification No. E-218). ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase of 12.5% Sodium HYPOChlorite Solution, That the Boards of Directors hereby Specification No. P-131 (Rebid) , to adopt Resolution No. 92-39, receiving Jones Chemicals, Inc. and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of 12.5% Sodium Hypochlorite Solution, Specification No. P-131 (Rebid) , to Jones Chemicals, Inc. , for the delivered price of $0.44 per gallon, plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning May 14, 1992, with provision for four one-year extensions upon mutually-agreeable terms. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 8 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 8 to the plans Job No. J-19-1 and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, authorizing an addition of $58,902.00 to the contract with `..� Hunter Corporation for two items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 13 to the plans and specifictions for That Change Order No. 13 to the plans Job No. J-19-2 and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. -J-19-2, authorizing an addition of $351,479.23 to the contract with Brinderson Corporation for nine items of additional work, including claims settlement, and granting a time extension of ten calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 20 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 20 to the plans Job No. P1-34-1 and specifications for Gas Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-1, authorizing an addition of $10,548.00 to the contract with Ziebarth 8 Alper for two items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. . -11- \� 05/13/92 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 9 to _ the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 9 to the plans . - Job Nos. P1-34-3, P1-35-2 and J-21 and specifications for Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-3; Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and SO at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-2; and Installation of Waste Digester Gas Flare Facilities at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-21, authorizing a net addition of $75,878.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. , for seven items of added or deleted work, and granting a time extension of nine calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for That change Order No. 3 to the plans Job No. P2-42-1 and specifications for Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-1, authorizing an addition of $46,087.00 to the contract with Ziebarth 8 Alper and C. S. Alper Construction Co. , Inc. for five items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services A reement That the Selection Committee with John arollo Engineers for certification of the final negotiated design, construction support fee relative to Addendum No. 2 to the services and preparation of Professional Services Agreement with operation and maintenance manuals John Carollo Engineers for design, re Job Nos. P1-38 and PZ-43, construction support services and providing for changes in the scope preparation of operation and of work and additional design maintenance manuals for Miscellaneous services Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43, providing for changes in the scope of work and additional design services to include safety items, landscaping design and odor control enhancements, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-40, approving Addendum No. 2 to said agreement with John Carollo Engineers for said additional services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $76,760.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $1,914,805.00 to an amount not to exceed $1,991,565.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -12- 05/13/92 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement That the Boards of Directors hereby with Dames 8 Moore for seismic adopt Resolution No. 92-41, approving studies re Job Nos. P1-38-3 antl Addendum No. 2 to the Professional P2-43-2 Services Agreement with Dames 8 Moore i to conduct Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Jab No. PI-38-3,and Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-2, providing for a reallocation of the costs among categories within said agreement, with no change in the maximum authorized compensation of $840,620.00, and providing for a name change to Dames 8 Moore, Inc. , a Delaware Corporation. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Professional Services Agreement with Carleton Engineers That the Selection Committee and Consultants, Inc. for certification of the final negotiated specialized consulting services re fee relative to the Professional Districts' compliance with the Services Agreement with Carleton South Coast Air Quality Management Engineers and Consultants, Inc. for District' s rules and regulations specialized consulting services relative to Districts' compliance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District' s rules and regulations, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-42, approving said agreement with Carleton Engineers and Consultants, Inc. for said services, on an as-needed basis, for three years, from June 1, �..� 1992 to May 31, 1995, at the following hourly rates: Agreement Period Hourly Rate 6/01192 - 5/31/93 $125.00 6101/93 - 5/31/94 127.50 6/01/94 - 5/31/95 130.00 Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to prequalify firms and solicit proposals for The the Staff Report dated May 5, Phase I Upgrade of Compliance Data 1992 re Phase I Upgrade of Compliance Base Management System, Data Base Management System, Specification No. 5-064 Specification No. S-064, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the staff be, and is hereby, authorized to prequalify firms and to solicit proposals for Phase I Upgrade of Compliance Data Base Management System, Specification No. S-064, for consideration by the Directors at a later date. -13- 05/13/92 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the General Manager to designate one staff member to That the General Manager be, and is r,r attend the Pollution Prevention hereby, authorized to designate one Strategies for Sustainable staff member to attend the Pollution Development International Workshop, Prevention Strategies for Sustainable June 2, 1992 through June 4, 1992, Development International Workshop, In Rome, Italy, as requested by EPA June 2, 1992 through June 4, 1992, in Rome, Italy, as requested by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for transportation, lodging, meals and Incidental expenses be, and is hereby, authorized in accordance with Districts' established expense reimbursement policies and budgetary authorizations. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written reports of the Fiscal Policy That the written reports of the Committee and Executive Comnittee Fiscal Policy Committee's meeting and Executive Committee's meeting held on April 15, 1992 and April 22, 1992, respectively, be, and are hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Appo nting Robert F. Driver Associates as broker of record for That the Boards of Directors do Districts' all-risk property, hereby appoint Robert F. Driver bo earthquake and iler and machinery Associates as broker of record for insurance program Districts' all-risk property, earthquake and boiler and machinery insurance program; and, FURTHER MOVED: That compensation for initial insurance policy renewal or placement, based upon insurance industry's standard commission practice be, and is hereby, authorized; and, FURTHER MOVED: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to negotiate an agreement on a fee-for-services basis for subsequent brokerage services. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79- 0, That the Boards of Directors hereby as amended, revising certain Sewer adopt Resolution No. 92-43, amending Collection Facilities Division and Classification and Compensation Information Services Division Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, position classifications and revising certain Sewer Collection salaries, as recommended by Facilities Division and Information classification study Services Division position classifications and salaries, as recommended by classification study. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -14- 05/13/91 ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Capital Improvement Program, 1990-92 Series C Certificates of Participation Issue Authorizing staff to negotiate and Moved, seconded and duly carried: execute an agreement with Merrill Lynch for underwriting services That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to negotiate an agreement with Merrill Lynch for underwriting services, for an amount not to exceed $5.95/$1,000 certificate for a variable-rate issue, or $9.95/$1,000 certificate for a fixed-rate issue; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel . Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. Approving Letter agreement with Moved, seconded and duly carried: Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander & Ferdon for special to-Bond That the Boards of Directors Counsel services hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-44, approving Letter agreement with Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander & Ferdon, dated April 7, 1992, for special co-Bond Counsel services, based on the following fee schedule: Maximum Type of Issue/Service Fee �..✓ Variable Rate Only $ 80,000 Variable and Fixed Rate Combination 100,000 Expenses At Cost Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. Approving Memorandum agreement with Moved, seconded and duly carried: Rourke & Woodruff for s ecial co-Bond Counsel services That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-45, approving Memorandum agreement with Rourke & Woodruff, dated April 7, 1992, for special co-Bond Counsel services, for a maximum fee not to exceed $7,500.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is . hereby made a part of these minutes. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. -15- 05/13/92 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, That the Boards of Directors hereby as amended, establishing a 1992 adopt Resolution No. 92-46, amending Summer Work Program Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, establishing a 1992 Sumner Work Program for painting, grounds maintenance and pump station maintenance work. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 19 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 19 to the plans Job No. P1-J3 and specifications for Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33, authorizing an addition of $954,004.00 to the contract with Gust K. Newberg Construction Company for seven items of additional work in settlement of contractor's claims, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman reported that on Opposing requirements for May 1, 1992 the SCAQMD Board disclosure of ex parte considered proposed Rule I11 re communications with members of the ex parte communications with members governing body of governmental of the South Coast Air Quality entities Management District Board. With some exceptions, the proposed rule basically would have required that any person communicating with a member of \J 1 the SCAQMD Board outside of a public meeting, and during the notice period for the issue at hand, shall disclose that communication in writing to the Clerk of the Air District Board. Further, the rule would have applied to any communication to personal staff of a Board member, or to the officers or staff of any governmental entity appointing authority or individual which appointed the Board member, for the explicit purpose of communicating to the Board member. Chairman Mahoney then advised that, as directed by the Executive Committee, he had sent a letter to the SCAQMD Board Chairman, Hank Wedaa, opposing Rule 111. He added that he also testified in opposition to the Rule at the hearing on May 1st. The Joint Chairman noted that the proposed rule received little support and was rejected by the SCAQMD Board. However, he cautioned Directors that SB 1328 (Rosenthal) had been introduced into the California Legislature which would require the SCAQMD to adopt ex parte disclosure requirements. Chairman Mahoney urged Directors to adopt the proposed resolution which would oppose all ex parte communication disclosures. He advised that if the resolution was adopted, it would be forwarded to Sacramento immediately to register the Districts' opposition to SB 1328. Director Wedaa (Chairman of the SCAQMD Board) added that the Air District's entire record and tape of the hearing on May 1st had been forwarded to Senator Rosenthal . He also noted that he had discussed the issue with Senators Rosenthal and Presley, the co-authors. Mr. Wedaa stressed the importance of sending letters indicating the Districts' opposition when issues such as these arise. -16- 05/13/92 It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-59, opposing requirements for disclosure of ex parte conmuni cations with members of the governing body of governmental entities. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried by Dedicating revenues for payment of each respective District: obligations That its Board of Directors does hereby adopt the following resolution dedicating revenues for payment of obligations: District No. Resolution No. 1 92-47-1 2 92-48-2 3 92-49-3 5 92-50-5 6 92-51-6 7 92-52-7 11 92-53-11 13 92-54-13 14 92-55-14 Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file ndrooritten report o thean pPtv Recycle That the written report of the and Reuse Committee Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee's meeting held on April 30, 1992, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re possible acquisition of landsite from Waste Water Disposal Company for use as a water recycling site Authorizing staff to enter into an Moved, seconded and duly carried: a regiment wi Waste Water Disposal Company WWDCthto allow site That staff be, and is hereby, investigations authorized to enter into an agreement with Waste Water Disposal Company (WWDC) to allow site investigations in order to characterize condition of WWDC property, providing the Districts with first right of refusal for acquisition of the site, and further -_ providing that WWDC pay the costs of investigation. -17- _ 05/13/92 Authorizing staff to negotiate an Moved, seconded and duly carried: agreement with Dames & Moore, Inc. to perform site investigation That staff be, and is hereby, services to characterize the authorized to negotiate an condition of the Waste Water agreement with Dames & Moore, Disposal Company property Inc. to perform site investigation services to characterize the condition of the Waste Water Disposal Company property, in an amount not to exceed $35,000.00; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel . ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Increasing Districts' participation in the "Think Earth" Environmental That the Boards of Directors do Education Consortium hereby authorize an increase in the Districts' participation in the "Think Earth" Environmental Education Consortium from $30,000.00 to $56,000.00, allocating an additional $26,000.00 for the Districts' share of the costs to complete and distribute the environmental educational materials for the K-6 (Kindergarten through 6th grade) program over the next five years. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve the written report of the Special That the written report of the Joint Works Selection Committee Special Joint Works Selection Committee's meeting on May 6, 1992, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Convene in closedde Se session pursuant to Government Cactions The Boards convened in closed session 54956.9 a and 54957 at 8:10 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9(a) and 54957. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board(s) of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. ALL DISTRICTS At 8:27 p.m. the Boards reconvened in Reconvene in regular session regular session. ALL DISTRICTS Upon return from closed session, it Approving substitution of Layman, was reported out that the Boards had Jones & Dye for Rourke & Woodruff approved the substitution of Layman, as counsel relative to Districts' Jones & Dye - Stanley R. Jones, Esq., defense in connection with for Rourke & Woodruff - Thomas L. liti atian entitled Count Woodruff, Esq. , as the attorney to anitation Districts of Orange represent and defend the interests of County v. Cooper Industries, Inc. , the Districts' in connection with et al . , US DC Case No. SACV92-89-L1L litigation entitled County Sanitation Districts of Orange County v. Cooper Industries, Inc. , et al . , USDC Case No. SACV92-89-LT -18- 05/13/92 ALL DISTRICTS Upon return from closed session, it Amending Classification and was reported that it was appropriate Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, to consider adoption of a resolution as amended, re management and relative to MPRP salary range supervisory salary range adjustments for management, adjustments supervisory and professional Job classifications. Whereupon it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adapt Resolution No. 92-60, amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, re management, supervisory and professional salary range adjustments. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Upon return from closed session, it Amending Classification and was also reported by the Joint Chairman Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, that it was appropriate to consider as amended, re General Manager's adoption of Resolution No. 92-61 salary regarding the General Manager's salary. Whereupon it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-61, amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, re General Manager's salary. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m. , May 13, 1992. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m. , May 13, 1992. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m. , May 13, 1992. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m. , May 13, 1992. -19- 05/13/92 DISTRICTS 1 8 2 Actions relative to Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30 Verbal report of staff The Director of Engineering reported that the Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30, begins at the Santa Ana River and extends easterly in Memory Lane, underneath the Santa Ana Freeway, along Owens Drive, then north in Parker Street and ending at LaVeta Avenue and Batavia Street in the City of Orange. The 2.2-mile long sewer will relieve current deficiencies in capacity within the local collection sewers of the Cities of Orange and Santa Ana. It will also eliminate the need for these cities to construct new sewers which were estimated to cost approximately $3.6 million. The new interceptor will also eliminate all marginal deficiencies within the Santa Ana systems, reduce the amount of flow needed to be diverted to the District No. 1 Raitt Street Trunk Sewer, utilize excess capacity in the SARI and preserve current excess capacity in District No. 1 facilities. He further reported that this project will be funded jointly by the cities and Districts 1 and 2. Mr. Dawes advised that eight bids had been received, and he recommended approval of the addenda and award of a contract to the low bidder, Mladen Buntich Construction Co. , Inc., in the amount of $3,471,857. Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: plans and specifications for �.r contract No. 2-30 That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30, making miscellaneous technical modifications, be, and is hereby, approved. Approving Addendum No. 2 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: plans and specifications for Contract No. 2-30 That Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30, changing the date for receipt of bids from April 14, 1992 to April 28, 1992, be, and is hereby, approved. Awarding Contract No. 2-30 to Moved, seconded and duly carried: Mladen Buntich Construction Co. , Inc. That the-Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-56, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for said project to Mladen Buntich Construction Co. , Inc. in the total amount of $3,471,857.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declaredthe meeting so adjourned at 8:38 p.m. , May 13, 1992. 20- 05/13/92 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of �..� Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:38 p.m. , May 13, 1992. DISTRICTS 6, 7 8 14 Actions re Final Supplement No. 2 to EIR for Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13, re Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1 , Contract No. 14-1-1A Verbal report of staff The Director of Engineering reported that since the formation of District No. 14 in 1986, Districts 6, 7 and 14 have been working toward the completion of a joint backbone sewage conveyance system which will deliver wastewater from certain areas in the communities of Irvine, Costa Mesa and Santa Ana to Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley. Portions of this interceptor have been completed and other portions are under construction. He noted that two easements remain to be acquired for the portion between Fairview Road at Baker Street and the Santa Ana River. One of the easements is within the Mesa Verde Country Club and Golf Course, south of Gisler Avenue and east of the Santa Ana River. The second is through a _ parking lot at the rear of an office building on Nutmeg Place just west of Harbor Boulevard. He added that the Mesa Verde Country Club opposed the necessary acquisition of the easement through their golf course, and challenged the Districts' previous CEQA documents in court. Mr. Dawes further reported that Supplement No. 1 to the EIR for Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13, re Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A, addressed the upsizing of the pipe and a revised alignment from that originally envisioned. Supplement No. 2 to said EIR was required to address certain issues that the court ruled were not included in previous CEQA documentation in connection with construction of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Contract No. 14-1-1A, relative to Mesa Verde Country Club' s maintenance access to Gisler Avenue and the monitoring and reporting aspects pertaining to mitigation measures for the golf course. Otherwise, the court had ruled in the Districts' favor on 29 of 31 counts. -21- 05/13/92 The Director of Engineering indicated that three written comments had been received relative to Supplement No. 2. Two of the comments were from the State of California, and the third was from the City of Costa Mesa. He also stated that there was one oral public comment by Mesa Verde Country Club at the public hearing held in April . Mr. Dawes further stated that all concerns and comments have been addressed in this Supplement No. 2 to the EIR. He also advised that the Districts have prepared a separate Monitoring and Reporting Program for this project. The Director of Engineering then outlined the required actions listed on the agenda relative to approval of Supplement No. 2 to said EIR and certification of Supplement Nos. 1 and 2. Receive and file written comments Moved, seconded and duly carried: received after the public hearing re Final Supplement No. 2 to EIR That the written comments received after the public hearing on April 8, 1992 on the Final Supplement No. 2 to Environmental Impact Report for Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13, relative to Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file Staff Summary Moved, seconded and duly carried: re Final Supplement No. 2 to EIR .,,. That Staff Summary dated April 21, 1992 re Final Supplement No. 2 to said EIR, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive, file and approve Final Moved, seconded and duly carried: Supplement No. 2 to EIR re Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from That the Final Supplement No. 2 Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, to Environmental Impact Report Contract No. 14-1-1A for Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13, relative to Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors do hereby certify that said Final Supplement No. 2 has been completed in compliance with the State and Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended. -22- 05/13/92 Rescinding Resolution No. 90-86 and Moved, seconded and duly carried: certif in Su lement No. 1 and Final bupglement No. z to EIR re That the Boards of Directors Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from hereby adopt Resolution Fairview Road to PlantNo. 1 No. 92-57, rescinding Resolution Contract o. 14-1-1A No. 90-86 (which previously certified Supplement No. 1 to said EIR) ; certifying Supplement No. 1 to Environmental Impact Report for Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13, relative to Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A; certifying Final Supplement No. 2 to Environmental Impact Report for Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13, relative to Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A; making certain findings relating to significant environmental effects identified in Final Supplement No. 2 to said EIR re Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A; adopting mitigation measures and monitoring plan; adopting statement of overriding considerations; and authorizing the filing of a Notice of Determination re said project. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:43 p.m. , May 13, 1992. lJ DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:43 p.m. , May 13, 1992. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:43 p.m. , May 13, 1992. Secr�f he�oards orvirectOrs of County Sanitation Districts . Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 -23- FUND NO 9199 JT GIST UCPKING CAf IIAL PROCESSING DATE 4"1/92 SAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CLUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/OR/92 POSTING DATE 09/08/92 - - - WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 12117! A L G INDUSTRIES $2.119.17 INSTRUMENT PARTS 121174 ADO KLNT-TAVLOA INC $395.91 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 221175 AG TLCM COMPANY 172.U68.04 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.30-9-91 121176 ASP ANALYSIS SI.UOP.GO ENGINE OIL ANALYSIS 121177 APEPICAR 1ELEFh CAE 0 TELEGRAFP $1.425.71 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 123178 AGGREKU. INC $8.701.22 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 121179 AIR COLD SUPPLY INC 121.09 AIR CONDITIONER PARTS 1211PO AIP PMCTC SERVICES $399.91 AERIAL PHOTOS 121181 AIR PPCCLCTS A CHEMICAL IN /33.630.00 O&M AGREEMENT GET GEN SYST. M.0.8.9.89 - 121182 ALMAPBRA FOUNDRY CC LTD S3RO.76 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 121163 ALLIED ELECTRONICS 1131.A0 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 121104 MOOED INC S/OR AMERICAN SEALS $926.65 MECHANICAL PARTS __..._ 121295 APER SOC FCR QUALITY CONIRCL $175.50 PUBLICATION 121166 A S T M $97.11 PUBLICATION 122197 BLARE P AhOERSCN $101.73 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 121188 ANIKIER - DISTRIBUTION $172.21 COMMUNICATION PARTS 121189 ANTNCKY.S RECM 1 PACMINE, INC. 9252.50 MACHINE REPAIRS 121190 A•FLUS SISTEPS 55.356.6A NOTICES 6 ADS ET1 321151 APATEN SLRVICES INC $3.160.13 UNIFORM RENTALS X 121192 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORE $566.09 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 2 121193 ART WORKS 2295.77 DRAFTING SUPPLIES b0 191194 ASSOC. ACPIKIS. L CONSULTANTS $1.457.07 MEDICAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATORS 121195 46ARES 1 IRCPPIES 130.68 PLAQUES -H 221196 PAK SAFETY C SUPPLY 11.221.36 SAFETY SUPPLIES ]a 121157 BANTER DIAGNCSTICS INC $6.251.09 LAB SUPPLIES 1 121158 PAYLESS STATICNERS $130.25 OFFICE SUPPLIED A� 121199 SLACCh BAY ENTERPRISES INC. $1.050.00 CAR WASH TICKETS 121200 BELL SECURITY $1.015.47 SECURITY SUPPLIES 121201 BLUE H ELECTRIC CC 53.718.00 LAB EQUIPMENT 12126P BCLSA PA(IAl(P SERVICE $60.34 - RADIATOR REPAIRS 121203 BON-A-RUES $168.88 TRUCK PARTS 121204 MOYLE ENGINEERING CORP $2.431.81 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-16 121265 PADUA E CALCWELL CONSLLTING 995.524.37 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3-19 121206 STEVE BLB/LC CCKSIRUCTIOK CO $799.493.00 CONSTRUCTION 2-26-3, 2-28 121267 PUILDER-S EMPORIUM $227.26 HARDWARE 12IPDN PUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE $133.47 PUBLICATION 121209 PUREE ENGINEERING CO F7S3.90 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 121210 GUSH AND ASSOCIATES INC $2.216.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-12-91 121211 PUSINESS LAWS INC $52.50 PUBLICATION . . . 121212 GARY G STREFD S404.75 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 121213 CFM CORPORATION 1360.52 LAB SUPPLIES 121214 C Y 1 11.113.9E ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 121215 SUPMIT SCILTICNS. INC $456.99 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 121216 CAL-GLASS FOP AESEAFCH INC. 2568.09 SAFETY SUPPLIES 121217 CALTROL INC G741.90 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 121218 CALIFORNIA AUTOPATIC GATE. 9419.35 SERVICE AGREEMENT FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/01/92 PAGE 2 RETORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIPS FAIL P4/n8/92 POSTING DATE 04/08/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 221219 CAL•S CAFERA3, INC. 1593.70 FILM/CAMERAS 121220 CAPLE70N ENGINEERS S7.277.5D ENGINEERING SERVICES M.0.5-9-90 121222 JOHN CAPOLLO ENbI%Ef RS 9137.532.63 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-36,P2-42,P1-20 121222 CENTURY SAFETY INST L SUPP $4.658.71 SAFETY SUPPLIES 122223 CHEVRON LEA INC S11.302.0R OIL 6 GREASE 121224 CCASI FIFE [OUIPMERT 1595.70 SERVICE AGREEMENT 121225 CEASE INSURANCE AGLACY S77.616.0n EARTHQUAKE INSURANCE M.0.3-11-92 123226 COLE-PAPM[R INSTRUMENT CO S1TL.70 LAB SUPPLIES 121227 COLIC" AND SONS - 1489.129.60 CONSTRUCTION I-9 _ . . 121220 CCPPLSA, INC. 11.31R.15 COMPUTSR HARDWARE/SOFTWARE 122229 CONNELL EP FARTS / DIY S154.53 TRUCK PARTS 121230 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST - $8.049.98 BLECTRIC PARTS 121231 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC T2.630.G3 TOOLS 121232 CONTINENTAL GRAFHICS 1239.74 PRINTING 121233 CChTPGLCC 111,0113.14 ELECTRIC PARTS 121234 CCUNIY WPCLESALE ELECTRIC 12.506.94 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 121235 CROSITY h OVERTON INC. $39.151.02 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES M.0.2-19-92 121236 UNTV OF CALIF REGENTS $3,154.92 WATER RESEARCH INSTITUTE PROJECT E'F1 221237 STATE CF CALIFCRNIA $15.954.54 STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE X 1212!E STATE DCARC CF EOLAL17AT1CN $30.37 HAZARDOUS WASTE TAX S 121239 C.W.P.C.A. - 1294.3E PUBLICATION 121240 DAMES I MOORE 131.065.75 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38-3, PZ-43-2 121241 DAPPER LIFE $1.004.66 TIRES —1 121242 PEIE" C CAVID CO 170.314.30 CONSTRUCTION 3-24-2 121243 DEVELCPPENT OIPEhS1OhS INTL. 53.990.79 TRAINING VIDEOS/WORKBOOKS ]? 121244 DIATEC ENRONPENTAL $1.835.25 CHEMICALS Z 121245 BE FILIPP 0 ASS DCU T E3 f109.91 PRINTING 121246 CIGITAL EGUIPIEKT CCPP $9.861.39 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 121247 CISCC PRINT COMPANY $385.37 OFFICE SUPPLIES 121248 DOLLINGCR CORP $1.716.66 - MECHANICAL PARTS - 121249 DORADO EKTERFPISES INC S33.568.09 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS 1212'-0 DUNN ECWANDS CCPT $635.24 PAINT SUPPLIES 1212E1 OURO-SENSE COPE $956.73 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 121252 D-VALS SALES S37.A3 FITTINGS 121253 EMA SERVICES INC 13.636.2b ENGINEERING SERVICES J-23-2, P2-44 1212'-/ 1ASTPAN INC $866.34 OFFICE SUPPLIES 121255 LnENPARC LOUIPMEKT $131.56 TRUCK PARTS 121256 ECOANALYSIS INC A4.549.20 CONSULTING SERVICES 121257 ASP SERVICE COMPANY S3.773.15 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 121258 ENCHANTER INC 54.410.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.7-17-91 1212`.9 EKVIPCNPEKIAL PESCUPCE ASSCC $1.0R2.50 LAB SERVICES 122266 EURCFA b"ELS $432.22 REFUND USER ME OVERPAYMENT 121261 EXCELLENCE IN TPAININR 5213.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 1212E2 JGIIN R FALKERS7CIN PE 13.T40.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9, P1-33 121263 FARR SALES S SERVICE SI22.58 FILTER 121264 FEOEPAL EXPRESS COMP 9659.75 AIR FREIGHT \_ FUND NC 9199 JT DIST ACPMIAG CAF170L PROCESSING DATE 4/01/92 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CCUKTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/04/92 POSTING DATE 04,16/92 - WARRANT NC. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 121265 FENRELLGAS $25.52 PROPANE 121266 FISCHER A PORTER CC 52.454.63 CHLORINATION PARTS 1212E7 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO 91,512.39 LAB SUPPLIES 121260 FLC-SYSTEPS 55.239.2P FUND? PARTS 121269 CITY OF FCUKTAIN VALLLY f1.986.06 WATER USE 121270 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $151.72 PAINT SUPPLIES 121271 FIN IRDUSIVIAL SALLS $598.37 TOOLS 121272 THE FONOCRO CO - 1142.90 INSTRUMENT PARTS 121273 AST. INC. $2.410.14 PAINT SUPPLIES 321774 GERDY PRESS 585.00 PUBLICATION 121275 GENERAL TELEFHCKE CC $361.71 TELEPHONE SERVICES 121276 GIFNLICH-PITCHELL INC 59,876.79 MECHANICAL PARTS 121277 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES INC 5752.00 PUBLICATIONS 122278 GRAHAM C JAMES $3.251.47 LEGAL SERVICES - MONTROSE CLAIM 121279 GREAT PACIFIC EQUIPMENT CC. $395.75 TRUCK PARTS 121280 DGK GREEK L ASSOCIATES 51.345.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-12-91 121281 60"E INVESTMENT $3.463.77 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 121292 HITCH A MIRK INC $1,479.99 ENGINE PARTS X 121283 HAULALAV CONTAINERS 12.970.00 CONTAINER RENTALS S 1212l4 AC FCFFYAN TKO/CR ISCC $21.121.69 LAB SUPPLIES 121285 J.1. HORVATH f ASSOC. $3.000.40 CONSTRUCI'ICN SERVICES J-23-1, J-17 UO 121286 HOUSE OF BATTERIES $24.59 BATTERIES 1212R7 CCPDCN V HOYT $990.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.0.9-12-90 1212lA PS MU GHEE CC IAC 1277.17 SAFETY SUPPLIES n 121289 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHWINN C 938.72 BICYCLE PARTS 121291 I.O. INDUSTRIAL CORP. 51.203.54 SODIUM RYPOCHLORITE W 121291 ICFA VAN. INC f628.71 SAFETY SUPPLIES 121292 IPFERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $30,713.34 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-14-90 121293 INDIAN SPRINGS MFG CO INC $75.27 FITTINGS 121294 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $805.07 CONNECTORS _ 121255 INTEPSTATE PA77TNY SYSTLYS 1672.A4 BATTERIES 121256 TOV16E PAACH VOTER OISTRICT $15.00 WATER USE 123297 JLA CREDIT CCRF $145.32 MICROFICHE READER LEASE 121298 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP 51.637.43 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 121299 JAYS CA7FRING 1985.22 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSE 121300 Jf NSER IASTRUFEKIS Co 54.998.60 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1213U1 JCPNSTOKE SUPPLY $171.65 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 121302 JOUAN, INC 55039.10 LAB EQUIPMENT 121503 M O Y S51.01 BUILDING MATERIALS 121304 MALLEEN•S COMPUTER PRODUCTS $92.03 INSTRUMENT PARTS 121305 KEENAN SLFPLY $569.94 PIPE 121306 THt KEITH COMPANIES 5504.RL• ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-35 121307 KING PENNING INC $461.16 MACHINE SUPPLIES 12130E KCHL-S HALLMARK CCKTTR 1672.36 OFFICE SUPPLIES 121369 PANTIN KIPOICK SP 52,862.87 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 121310 L,s,S, CO INC LLEAKALf PT SERVI f2.212.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS FORD KC 9199 • JI VISI I(PRIRG CAPIIAL PROCESSING DATE 4/GI/92 FAST A REPORT NUMBER AP9S COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/08/92 POSTING DATE 04/06/92 - - WARRANT KC. VFKCOP AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 121321 L L C TIRE SERVICE 147.59 TRUCK PARTS 121312 LFGI-TECH $525.60 COMPUTER SERVICES 121313 LTVITCROLE CCRF $1.461.50 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 121314 RP LINUSTROM IKC $2,600.02 CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.30-30-90 121315 MPS $13.96 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 121316 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS INC 52.323.53 MACHINE REPAIRS 121317 P.AKMCLE ADJUSTIRG $4.950.00 MANHOLE ADJUSTING 121316 PAPThE L WANE SUFPIY FNb.10 VALUES 121319 MAPVAC ELEC700NICS S64.UO INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 321320 MATRICES CONSULTANTS INC $107.21 PUBLICATION 121321 MIME MCCARTMY $6.000.00 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 121l22 MCGANRY CFKIPAL TVFENPITEP 1 SR.99 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT _ 121323 MEASUPFPEAI VARIAPLES 51.966.9A INSTRUMENT PARTS 121324 MECHANICAL SEAL REPAIR 5156.15 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 121325 MICRCAGE COMPUTER $1.794.95 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 121326 MIC6AY PFC 6 PACHINIKC 56.250.00 MSCHANICAL REPAIRS 121327 MILLTRUNICS 5293.60 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 121329 MTKNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PATS. $99.13 OFFICE SUPPLIES m 121329 MIIChELL INSTRUPENT CO SIM8.00 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES >C 1213!0 PI7CFELL FACIFIC COKSTRUCICPE SE5.797.96 CONSTRUCTION 7-12-2 Z 121331 JAMES M OCKTOOPLRY - $233.09 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.O.6-13-90 121332 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES $4.500.00 LAS SERVICES 1223l3 MCAGAN CRANE CC INC 91.651.20 TRUCK PARTS 1 221334 NA71CRAL PLAIT SERVICES INC 53.700.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 121335 hATICKAI TECfKICAL INFCRMAII 553.50 LAB SERVICES n 121336 NEAL SUPPLY CO 5119.55 OIL 1213ST NOPCAL CCKTRCLS INC - $817.4_1 MECHANICAL PARTS _.. 122338 RCR ThERK iELFCCM 81.7110.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 1213l9 NLIECh CCFFCRAIICK 51.987.77 LAB SUPPLIES 121340 01 CORPORATION $3.660.00 SERVICE AGREEMENTS 121341 OFFICE FAVILION/INTERIOR PC$ 1662.01 OFFICE SUPPLIES 121342 PETTY OLS(h. PNU 5969.50 WATER RESEARCH INSTITUTE PROJECF 121343 OR SYSTEPS CC $18.433.16 CHLORINS M.0.30-9-91 121349 ORACLE CORPORATION $550.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - INFO. SERV. 121345 ORANGE VALVE R fITTINS CO. $1.258.55 FITTINGS 121346 ORITEX ((PP $9,564.52 MECHANICAL PARTS 121347 OSCAR.S LICK L SAFE 555.00 SECURITY SERVICES 121308 OXYGEN SERVICE $1.214.37 SPECIALTY GASES 121349 ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD $101.239.85 CONDEMNATION - ELLIOTT OIL WELLS 121350 COUNTY SAKITATICh DISTRICT $2.164.39 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE 121351 PC PAGAZIRE $61.97 SUBSCRIPTION 121352 PSI - - - - - — - 6135.18 - TRUCK PARTS 121353 PSUCFPOUL SUPPLY OF OC) 'IS 1.66 GROUNDSKERPING SUPPLIES 121354 FIST $779.40 T.V. SEWER 122355 PACIFIC LIFLISHERS $67.50 PUBLICATION 121356 FACO PL'PFS $76.11 PUMP PARTS FUND NO 9199 JT DIST YEPKIKG CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/01/92 P46F 5 REPORT NUMBER AF93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04108/92 POSTING DATE 04/06/92 - WARRANT NC. VEACOP AMOUNT DESCPIPTION 121307 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO $2.575.61 SAFETY SUPPLIES 121358 PACIFIC BELL 9628.63 TELEPHONE SERVICES 321359 PACIFIC CFCORATING CENTERS f99.86 BUILDING MATERIALS 121360 PICTIL PERICIAN SYSTEMS $6.596.00 TELEPHONE MODIFICATIONS 1213E1 PAM LEST $411.61 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 121362 PARAGON CABLE $36.78 CABLE SERVICES .... -.._._ 121363 PATTEN CORP/ TAYLOR INSTR SI27.59 CHART PAPER 121364 PAUL-PUKRCF 3655.36 TRUCE PARTS 121365 PIPA GAG SVSTEPS IRC l98.171.10 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 . ._ .. 121366 PIONEER BANK 999.313.Ba CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 5-36-3 121367 POLVMETRICS. INC. 5391.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 121368 PCLYFLRE INC $17.545.60 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-87 .- 321369 PCKTCN IRCUSTRIES INC 91,119.38 INSTRUMENT PARTS 121370 POSIMASYER 16405.00 P.O. BOX RENTAL 321371 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICL 592.00 ICE _ . -.. 321372 PREFISSICAIL SFpViCE IND. $1.193.0A SOIL TESTING M.0.7-17-91 121373 THE FRU�ECI SOLUTIONS CO. $4.425.06 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O.7-17-91 FTR 121374 PU77MEISYER INC $1,355.51 PUMP PARTS X 121375 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO.. INC $194.94 LAD SUPPLIES = 121376 RU SYSTEMS INC 9166.00 ELECTRIC PARTS ti0 121377 RECTO INC 550.8I6.40 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.3-13-91 121378 RED LINE AND 5260.00 STREET SWEEPING --4 121319 REDI EPPPESS $28.35 FREIGHT a 121380 THE AEPLELIC SLFFLY CC $5.507.62 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 1 121381 RICH COLCP LAB 6161.63 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES VI 121302 ROSEMOUNT INC. $420.09 INSTRUMENT PARTS 121383 ROYCE INSTRUPENT '- - ' 986.61 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 121384 RYAK-MERCC 22.491.59 MECHANICAL PARTS 121305 SAFELY-KLEEN CORP 580.75 PARTS CLEANER 121366 CITY OF SANTA ANA 3959.04 CONTRACT SERVICES 121387 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 5959.28 PLUMBING PARTS 121398 OCUG SARIIS $1.050.00 CPR/FIRST AID/DEFENSIVE DRIVER TRAINING 121389 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS IRT-L 912.286.65 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-12-91 121390 SEA COAST DESIGNS 5331.61 OFFICE MACHINE 121391 SCPPEKTIV CCRVEYCP COMP 59.232.93 MECHANICAL PARTS 121352 SHAYRCCK SLPFLY $965.60 TOOLS _ 121393 SHLRVOOD MEDICAL CO S408.31 LAB SUPPLIED 121394 RUTH SHOURDS 5119.1,9 REFUND INSURANCE PREMIUMS 121395 3HUPELUCK SALES $421.33 TOOLS . . _-._ ..__ _... 121396 SIEMA CPEPICAL CO $86.01 LAB SUPPLIES 121397 SIGNS ETC. 53.593.01 SIGNS 12139E SILVERI L LF SOUEF - - - --- $756,621.20 - CONSTRUCTION 5-34-3 _ . . 12139a SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLI $2,628.00 PRE EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 121000 SLIDE RASTER $72.65 PRESENTATION AIDS 121491 SPITH-EMEFV CC $324.60 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-17-91 _ . . . _ 121402 SOETVARE PY SEIDPAN $57.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE FUND NO 9199 Ul DIET 1(PNINC CAFITA1 PROCESSING DATE 4/01/92 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 011US/92 POSTING DATE 04/06/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOP AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 121403 SOUTH COAST WATER $97.50 WATER USE 121401 SC CALIF COASTAL 6ATEP $4.690.06 OCEAN MONITORING H.O.6-10-09 12146E SCLTPERK CALIF EDISCN CC $27.482.66 POWER 121406 SOUTHERN COUNIIES CIL CO 52.266.56 DIESEL/UNLEADED FUEL 121407 SOUVENIR PHOTO 57.35 PHOTO SERVICES 121408 STAMEN 2 SFASSEFF PE 57.110.O0 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.O.3-11792 121,469 SFECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEFS IRC $161.54 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 121410 SPEC TECH INC 5375.19 WELDING SUPPLIES 121411 SRECO FLEXIBLE $579.59 TRUCK PARTS 121412 STAR TOOL S SUPPLY CO 9501.03 TOOLS 121413 STATEWICE INSTALLERS $1.000.80 MOVING SERVICES - LAB 121414 SIERLINC ART - $9.61 ART SUPPLIES 121415 SUMMIT STEEL ll.U39.71 METAL 121416 SUPELCO INC 5352.71 LAB SUPPLIES 12/117 SUFFR CPEP CORP 5915.56 CHEMICALS 121418 SUPER ICE CORP $81.76 ICE 121419 TALICO• INC $109.35 LAB SUPPLIES 121,429 TALIN TIRE INC $297.39 TIRES - - X 121421 TAUBER ELECTRONICS $96.97 BATTERIES S 121422 TAVLCR-CLAR FFG CCPFANY $2,100.51 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 321123 TECNRICAL PRODUCTS S LINES $2.394.33 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES GU CELLULAR TELEPHONE/BATTERY PACK 121425 TELE•CELL. INC $150.00 -{ 121426 TPA/RORCAL ,552.31 LAB REPAIR 12112k 7P[YF30N IN CLPiRIAI EDPPLT $1.552.3T REPAIR REPAIRS a 121127 TOLEDO SCALE CORF. 1790.5U SCALE REPAIR8 121.2H TONT.S LCCN A SAfE SERVICE A116.OR KEYS 121429 TOTS LANDSCAPING CO $3.814.37 CONTRACT GROUNDS KEEPING M.O,1143r91 . 121430 WESTRCNICE 510009.37 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 121431 TRANSPITTEA SPECIALISTS $337.56 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 121432 TRAVEL TRAVEL $1.11i.55 TRAVEL SERVICES M.O.6-12-91 121433 TRUCK 6 AMC SLFFLY INC $1.027.63 TRUCK PARTS 121434 JG IUCkER L SIN INC 1106.76 INSTRUMENT PARTS 121435 ULINA SCIENTIFIC 63ul.00 LAB SUPPLIES 121436 UNION BANK $9.533.10 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 7-12-2 121437 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 5279.12 PARCEL SERVICES 121438 VRITEC STATES ELEVATOP CORP 5769.50 ELEVATOR PARTS 121439 UNIVERSAL VARIKE INOUSTRIFS $822.05 LAB SUPPLIES 121990 VG/FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $21,375.71 LAB EQUIPMENT 121111 VYR SCIENTIFIC 51.587.13 LAB SUPPLIES 121112 VALIK CCPPORATION /99.52 REGULATOR PARTS 121113 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO $3.375.58 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 1211/1 VALLEY DETROIT PIESEL 5130.73 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 121015 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS 1591.00 LAB SUPPLIES 121116 VERVCN FACING COFFANV 51.370...0 MANHOLE COVERS 121117 VILLACE RURSEPIES $28.05 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 121448 WARREN G(PHAF S LAMONT IAC 1109.1E PUBLICATION FUKO KC 9199 JT GIST 6IPKIK6 CAPITAL PPOCESSIN6 DATE 4101/92 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/08/92 POSTING DATE OM 06192 - WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 121449 VEATHFR AND VINO INSTPUMENI $290.13 SAFETY SUPPLIES 121450 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUFFLY 425.635.71 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.0-8-90 121451 VESCC $1.141.69 RLEMRIC SUPPLIES 121452 NMESSCE VAREC $45.89 MECHANICAL PARTS 121453 ROURKE 4 WOODRUFF S93.577.69 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.10-E0-90 121454 WOOD6APD GOVEMNCP CO 57009.45 INSTRUMENTATION 121455 YERDK CCPF 494422.29 COPIER LEASES 12145E RICHARD ICLKG FPCO $2.347.46 PRINTING SUPPLIES ----------------- TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 04/08/92 $3,739,880.89 SUMMARY AMOUNT 11 OPER FUND $435.00 12 OPER FUND $2,062.70 12 CAP FAC PANE $799,933.84 X13 OPER FUND $14,599.53 = 13 CAP PAC FUND $72,335.30 /5 OPER FUND $1,050.45 CG 15 CAP PAC FUND 6547,419.50 16 OPER FUND $23.87 17 OYER FUND $3,125.81 y 17 CAP FAC FUND $167,400.41 1 114 CAP FAC FUND 61,780.75 V P566 OPEN FUND - -- $2,475.58 ._ 1566 CAP FAC FUND $21,773.20 1667 OPER FUND $2,933.48 Y7614 OPER FUND - $395.60 . . _.- ... _. JT OPER FUND - $669,955.61 CORD $911,968.60 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $65,432.36 ... JT WORKING CAPITAL $154,771.40 "'""""'---- $3,739,800.89 _ . ._ ... ... ..._.._ FUND NO 9199 JT DIST VCRKIN6 CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/16/92 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/22/92 POSTING DATE 04/22/92 -- ------ - _' ' - '--"-'--'-'- WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 121477 ACIA♦ INLAND EPPIRE CHAPTER f480.D0 TRAINING REGISTRATION 123478 AG TECH COMPANY $87.564.86 RESIDUALS REMOVAL H.0.10-9-91 _ 121479 ASR ANALYSIS 3280.00 ENGINE OIL ANALYSIS - - 121480 ACCU•IABS RESEARCH INC $50.00 LAB SERVICES 121481 ACTICN CCCB REFAIR CORP 5211.95 BUILDING REPAIRS _ 121482 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES - - $338.28 LAB SUPPLIES - - - 121483 ADVANCED COOLING TECHNOLOGIES 1131.56 ELECTRIC PARTS 12118E ADVANCO CCNSTRUCTORS INC $1,598.900.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-30-3, P1-35-2 121485 AIR COLD SUPPLY INC $32.26 AIR CONDITIONING SUPPLIES - 181986 AIR CONOITIONING SPECIALTIES - $140.09 ELECTRIC PARTS 121487 AMERICAN CABLING S COMM 3139.69- CABLE 121468 AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY - f99.92 PUBLICATION 121409 AFERICAN FLEET FARTS $254.29 PUBLICATION 121450 AMERICAN HI-LIFT $5,556.69 HARDLIFT K L ARE 121491 ROPCO INC f/OR AMERICAN SEALS - $3.483.60 TRUCK 121892 AMERSHAM CORP 3910.00 GASKAS SUPPLIES TS 123493 CITY OF ANAHEIM $940.00 LAB REPAIRS 121494 SHOP EI•< fLA<S CC - - 35.603.4E - -- - LAB EQUIPMENT 121495 A-PLUS SYSTEFS 36.497.17 ADVERTISING X 121496 ABC LABORATORIES 52.632.50 SERVICE AGREEMENTS 2 121997 ARATEN SERVICES INC 22,622.41 UNIFORM RENTALS -. .. _._.. C~0 121458 ARENS INCLSTRIES INC $1,624.60 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 121499 ARIZCNA IASTRUMENT 5232.97 INSTRUMENT PARTS __j 121500 ARM TECHNOLOGIES --' - - -- - $4.800.00 '- -- - " - USRR FEE PROGRAMING - - -- --- --- --- 121501 ASSOCIATEC CONCRETE PROD 1 9862.00 BUILDING MATERIALS t" 121502 ASSOCIATEC LABCRATORIES $1.100.00 LAB SUPPLIES 1 lF1503 DENTAL IA.,LRANCE CONSULT. -- - - - - - S12.00 - ~ 121504 BC AN AL VTI CAL S5.462.00 LAB DENTAL TRUCK REPACES IRS R IICURANC6 CONSULTING -_-"--'" 121505 RC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC $61.42 E 122506 SIP TRANSPORT CYNAPICS CORP $3.000.00 T PAIR _- REFUND USER FEB OVERPAYMENT 21507 DRA SAFETY L SIPF LT $546.29 SAFETY SUPPLIES 221508 RANAAA BLLEPPINT f7.1 16.A2 BLUEPRINTING M.0.10-10-90 121510 P BATEMAN DIAGNOSTICS f600.00 LAB SUPPLIES COMP DISTRIBUTION ------ 121511 WI BI DIRGNOINC INC f2R$270.56 LAB SUPPLIES 121511 V1 BILL AR[ INC $721.76 TRUCK PARTS 12t512 BIC-RAD UPOPATOPIES - f121.76 LAB SUPPLI88 121513 BLUE M ELECTRIC CO $146.07 LAB EQUIPMENT 1215t9 BOEHRINGER MANNHEIM $334.48 LAB SUPPLI88 121515 BCYLE ENEINEERINC COPP $30.609.19 ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 90-101 ----- 121516 BREANER-FIEDLER 3 ASSCC IN 3513.97 COMPRESSOR PARTS 121517 BRINDERSCN CCRP $149.846.71 CONSTRUCTION J-19-2 121518 PRINOERSON CORP -- - - -- - .-- f9.715.35--- -- -CONSTRUCTION M-037 ----- - ------ 121519 BRISTOL BABCOCK $1.331.05 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 121520 RRCVN L CALEVELL CONSULTING $51,362.89 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-37 321521 BUILDERS EMPORIUM 572.51 HARDWARE/LUMBER _-"'-- 221522 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES INC f1.104.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-12-91 FUND NC 9199 Jl OISI NCPKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/16/92 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION OISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/22/92 POSTING DATE 04/22/92 - - -- . - - VIBRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 121523 GARY G STREED $5.312.24 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 121524 C M 1 266.50 ELECTRIC PARTS 121525 CS CCMPANV 9377.20 VALVES 122526 CALIRCL INC 55.968.13 HARDWARE 121527 CA INS T I TOTE OF TECHNOLOGY $0.318.02 BIOASSAY RESEARCH 121528 CALIFORNIA JOURNAL INC $167.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 121529 CANNON-VACHON-CANNON SL65.31 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 121530 CALF PCLIR 1 EGUIFNENI $422.86 TRUCK PARTS 121531 CENTURY FAINT $800.87 PAINT SUPPLIES - 121532 CENTURY SAFETY INST A SUPP 124.986.69 SAFETY SUPPLIES 121533 DICK CEPEN INC $252.29 TRUCK PARTS 121534 CHEVRCN LSA INC $3.239.59 OIL 6 GREASE - 121535 CHROPE CRANKSHAFT INC $210.00 121536 CONPkESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA 1339.0E HARDWARE REPAIRS H 121537 COMPUTER BAY 93.536.36 ARDNARB COMPUTER R6PAIR8 12153E CCPPUSA. INC. S50?.16 COMPUTER HARDNARB/SOFTNARE 211 121539 CCPPLSEAVF 111.17 COMPUTER SERVICES SERVICES 121540 CONNELL$ PH070GRAPHT f283.90 PHOTOGRAPHIC 88RVIC6B X 12159E CONNELL ON PARES / OIV .124.02 TRUCK PARTS = 121542 COkl IKEKI1E0 ELECTRICAL DIS7 94,326.09 ELECTRIC BUPPLI68 121593 CCk11KEK1AL AIR TOILE INC N.128.40 TOOLS 121544 CONTINENTAL LAB FRODUCTS STORE f1$265.40 LAB BUPPLI68 121595 COSTAAC TORS BOON STORE 3265.90 PUBLICATION 121546 COSTA PESA AUTO SUPPLY .766.33 TRUCK PARTS 121597 CCUNIV N[L ESALC ELECTRIC f2.766.33 PURIP PARTS SUPPLIES 121548 CURRIES F CPC�LIENVIRONMENTAL CO 381.70 JANITORIAL PARTS N 12155R SURLIN6 TON CTAL f1.3B1.80 JANITORIAL BUPPLI68 - 121551 STATE OF CALIFORNIAALFPNIA 366.00 HAZARDOUS US WASTE TAX 12155E STATE CF CALIFCPNIA f180.81 TRAINING G R GTAX IS 121553 D.L.P.f.A. 1BO.00 NOTICES REGISTRATION 121553 DAILY P ACT .682.23 TIRES 6 ADS 121555 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE f1.$78.85 TIRES 121556 GAIN-CAL CCRP 213.05 COMPUTER ER FEE 12155E DETA ELECTRONICS $150.00 REFUND EQUIPMENT FEE OV6RPAYMBNT 121558 OE AN2A COR PRODUCTS $169.30 RENTAL PLIES NT 121559 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS .897.63 LAB SUPPLIES -- -- 121559 DE2URIK AND/OR CS CO f3.89T.63 VALVES 121560 DIALOG INFORPATICN SERVICES 53.55 COMPUTER eOFTNARB 12156E VICTEC E511 RfN POSTAL flr$51.52 CHEMICALS - - -- - - -- --- 121562 DIGITAICH - POST CC 100.61 OFFICE SUPPLIES 121563 DIGITAL EQUIENTERMENTPRISES COUP ST0.1/0.61 OFFICE MAINTENANCE 121565 EPAADn ENTFRAP ISES INC f43.915.12 PLANT MAINTENANCE B RBPAIR9 - -- --- 121565 EPA SFPV ICES INC . ENGINEERING SERV ICES P2-90 12156E E NAN INC f3.866.16 OFFICE SUPPLIES 12156E ENOAANLY313 INC .00. CONSULTING SERVICES E 121560 ENCHANTER INC 14.910.00 OCEAN MONITORING H.O.7-17-9]- -- -- - FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4126192 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CCUh TV SANITATION DISTRICTS Of ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/22/52 POSTING DATE 04/22/92 -' -- __-- WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 121569 EASECO-CALLAD $3.009.00 LAB SERVICES 121570 ANCUS ELEEIRCRICS $1,006.49 RECORDER REPAIRS 121571 ELPOPA %FEELS $304r12 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT - 121572 MARSHALL FAIARES 6178.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 121513 JOHN 8 FALKENSTEIN PE $3.400.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 121574 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP - $892.25 AIR FREIGHT - --'- -'------ 121575 FENRELLGAS 1162.06 PROPANE 121576 57 PARK PLAZA HOTEL $767.90 TRAINING REGISTRATION 121577 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURA 1500.00 PUBLICATION --- 121578 FISCFER I PORTER CO f6.337.8P INSTRUMENT 121519 FISHER SCIERTIFIC CC f1.906.71 LAB SUPPLIES 122580 FLUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $709.34 PUMP PARTS 121581 CLIFFORD A FORKERT $14.107.11 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-12-91 1215E2 FCURIAIK VALLEY FAINT 5265.67 PAINT SUPPLIES 1215E3 FCV ENTEFFAISES $1.825.00 SAFETY CONSULTANT 121584 FCR INDUSTRIAL SALES $32L.51 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 121585 THE FONBURO CO $468.14 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 121586 FREDERICK POPP 0 ENGINFFPIN $209.35 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES m 121587 DUC FREY $71.16 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION x 221568 CITY OF FULLERTCN 128.1E WATER USE = 121589 GST. INC. 5559.06 OFFICE SUPPLIES 121590 GANAHL LUMBER CO $3.461.03 LUMBER to 121591 GENERAL IELEPHCKE CC $4.651.37 TELEPHONE SERVICES .� 121552 CHARLES P CEPPE $250.00 SEMINAR A 21593 GIENLICH-PIICHELL IKC S23r194.51 MECHANICAL PARTS LTl 221594 GOLDAL/UDSEC $110.23 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 121595 GO VERNMENI INSTITUTES INC $3I8.00 PUBLICATION - ' W 121596 GRAHAM I .INES $989.67 LEGAL SERVICES - MONTROSE CLAIM 121597 OCR GREEP 1 ASSOCIATES 515.923.00 SURVEYING SERVICES SPEC 9-051 - 121598 GREENFIELD, TURBOW, SCHIFF MDS - 9235.00 MEDICAL CLAIM - SECOND OPINION 121599 BROTH EQUIPMENT CORP $2.046.00 VALVES 221600 GROVE INVESTMENT 13.205.21 REFUND USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT 121601 hP TVFE A GRAFHICS $34.48 PRINTING - - 221602 HAAKER ECLIPPENT CC 9275.01 TRUCK REPAIRS 1216US FRED A HARPER 51.500.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 121604 HARRINGTOR INDUSTRIAL PLASII $103.27 VALVES 121605 FL FAWK CO IKC $1.152.49 INSTRUMENT PARTS 121666 JCEL W FELGPLTH FH.D. 92.550.00 MASTER PLAN CONSULTING 121607 NIXON METAL FINISHING $2,884.83 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT - 121608 HORIZON HIGH PEACH 1 EQUIP $21.53 TRUCK REPAIRS 121604 J.T. HORVATH A ASFOC. $3.000.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, J-17 I21610 RS hUOMES CO IRC $156.16 PAINT SUPPLIES - - - '- 121611 HUNTER COPPORA710N 9909.775.00 CONSTRUCTION J-19-1 121612 CITY OF HUNTINGTON OLACH 57.520.91 WATER USE 121613 MUKTINGTOR APC/JEEP/PENAULT $290.65 TRUCK PARTS -"' - 121619 HUKTIKGIOh BEACH ROBBER SIA $290.93 OFFICE SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WEANING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1/16/92 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CCUKIY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/22/92 POSTING DATE 04/22/92 - - --- WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 121615 HLNTIAGTCk SICAAL OIL CC $236.88 REFUND USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT 121616 HUNTINGTON SUPPLY $101.35 HARDWARE 121617 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHWINN C f323.25 BICYCLE PARTS 121618 HURLEY ELECTRONICS INC f13.01 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 121619 ICP CCNIRCLS IKC $499.05 ELECTRIC PARTS 121620 IMPERIAL VEST CHEMICAL $59.282.78 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.1-13-91 121621 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS 942.83 CONNECTORS 121622 INGEPSOLL•RAND EQUIP CORP 562.01 TRUCK PARTS 121623 IKLAKC IPPIPE EQUIPMENT CC. 6762.4E TRUCK FRUITS 121624 INTCRNAIIEKAL SENSOR TEC6 f55.96 INSTRUMENT PARTS 121625 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 2552.27 BATTERIES 121626 IRVIAE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $52.92 WATER USE 121627 GREAT VESICRk SANITARY SUPP $1.042.25 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 12I620 JIPrS SLFFEKSICR SERVICE 5259.8E TRUCK PARTS 121629 JOHNSON E HIGGINS $5.150.00 TRUCK PARTS 12I630 JDHNSTONE SUPPLY fl.J16.60 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 121631 JOUAN. INC $694.39 LAB EQUIPMENT f17 1216E2 KALLEENrS COMPUTER PRODUCTS 278.29 INSTRUMENT PARTS X 121633 KING BEAFIKG IRC $5.718.78 MACHINE SUPPLIES = 121634 EASTMAN KODAK CO 6101.70 LAB SUPPLIES 121635 MAkTIK KCPOICK SR - $2,963.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 to 121636 LC RESOLPCES $1.075.74 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 121637 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO 5110.72 SERVICE AGREEMENT 121638 CPC PRESS INC. f15.00 PUBLICATION to 121639 LIFHERT CORPORATION f573.50 ELECTRIC PARTS 1 121610 LIYIICP OU[ CI RP f1 r913.71 ELECTRIC PARTS 121611 KP LINOSIROM IKC f5r 1S0.88 CONSULTING - BNVIRONMBNTAL 121642 LORAIN PRODUCTS 21.251.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT 121643 MFS 5T3.17 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 121611 MACOPCO 2173.20 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 121645 MAINTENANCE FRCCICTS IKC 5951.16 REPAIR MATERIALS 121646 MANTEK $136.12 ELECTRIC PARTS 121647 MARCFL ELECTRONICS $631.03 REFUND USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT 121648 MARVAC ELECTROKICS f66.29 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 121649 MAIT CPLCP IKC $2.004.41 CHLORINATION PARTS 121650 MCMASTFR-CARP SUPPLY CO $776.13 MECHANICAL PARTS 121651 MICROSOFT S1.082.69 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 1216-2 VICLAY PPE L PACPINIRG 61057.69 PUMP PARTS 121653 MINNLSGTA ILSTERK VISUAL PNES. 619.57 OFFICE SUPPLIES 121654 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO $432.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 121655 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES $1.000.00 LAB SERVICES 121656 MCTICK IKCUSIR/IS IRC 1342.12 MECHANICAL PARTS 121657 PCInRCLA IKC 65.712.D1 INSTRUMENTS 121658 AT IKOUSTNIES. IkC. 52.520.00 REFUND USSR POE OVERPAYMENT 121659 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL 4190.16 SAFETY FILM RENTALS 121660 NEAL SLPFLY CO $2.360.76 LUSE OIL ' FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST UCRRING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/16/92 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIPS PAID 09/22/92 POSTING DATE U0/22/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 1216E1 GUST K NEWBERG CONST CO 2143.221.70 CONSTRUCTION PI-33 121662 NEUARN ELECTRONICS 9630.55 ELECTRIC PARTS 121663 CITY OF NEVPORT BEACH 39.25 WATER USE 121664 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 3250.U6 WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAM 121665 NOVCY 11.632.82 LAB SUPPLIES 121666 OFFICE FIVILICN/INTERIOR PIS 5950.39 OFFICE FURNITURE " -- 121EE7 CAC PICKET FLIGHT GUICE 987.40 SUBSCRIPTION 121668 DX SYSTEMS CO 230.454.05 CHLORINE M.O.30-10-91 121669 ORACLE CORPORATION $10.234.06 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 121670 ORANGE CCUNTY CHEMICAL CO 91.914.37 HYDROCHLORIC ACID 121671 ORANEE VALVE E FITTINC CO. $2,156.27 INSTRUMENT PARTS 121672 CVL SCIENTIFIC PLASTICS 3289.81 LAB SUPPLIES 121673 OXYGEN SERVICE $1.044.89 SPECIALTY GASES 121674 CSOOC SELF-FLNUED P[OICAL 1 $100,000.00 SELF-FUNDED HEALTH INS. PREMIUM ADVANCE 121675 CCUNTY SANITATICh DISTRICT $12.976.98 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FUND 121676 CCUNTY CF GRANGE 381.00 REMIT FEES 121677 PACIFIC ENERGY RESOURCES 9703.76 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT FC7 121678 PACIFIC PARTS 52.650.95 INSTRUMENT PARTS X 121679 FACIFIC SAFETY EOUIPMEhT CC 33.180.20 SAFETY SUPPLIES 2 1216A0 FACTEL PERIDIAN SYSTEMS $87.53 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 1111681 PAGENET 354.00 PAGER RENTALS 121682 PALMIERI. TYLER. V7EAEP. $6.790.63 LEGAL SERVICES - OIL WELLS 121683 FARTS LNLIPIIED $1.059.18 - TRUCK PARTS tO 121604 PATTEN CCRP/ TAYLOR INSIM $272.08 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1 121685 PBY PCNDERGRAFI 3R60.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION N 1216l6 FI NMIN.CL PER CD.P,R.,ToA 1392.36 LAB SUPPLIES 121607 PIP.A GPO SYSTEPS INC $99.533.40 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 — 1216FS PIONEER SAAR 315.842.40 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 5-30-3 121689 PITNEY BOWES 3992.81 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 121690 PLAINS INUEVALUE HARDWARE $100.49 HARDWARE 221691 PCLYPETNICS. INC. $341.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 121692 PCLVFLPE INC $15.315.31 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-57 121693 PCUERSCAh INC $122.66 COMPUTER PARTS 121694 POWER SYSTEMS 3937.76 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 121695 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE 304.00 ICE 121696 PPCFESS]ChPL TREE CARE 0655.00 GROVNDSKEEPINO SERVICES 122697 ThE PADIECT SCLUTIONS CO. $4.602.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91 121698 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS 3921.91 ELECTRIC PARTS 121699 RAINBOW CISPCSAL CC $1.300.17 TRASH REMOVAL 121700 RED LINE IAC $260.00 STREET SWEEPING 122701 REDI EXPRESS 369.30 LAB SERVICES 122702 THE REGISTER - $60.45 NOTICES 6 ADS - 121703 THE REPUELIC SUPPLY CO $2.156.15 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 1217C4 J P PCBEPIS CCPF 3295.273.00 CONSTRUCTION J-23-1 121705 PEGGY RUPP 35oO.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION - - 121706 RYAN-HEPCO $4.131.14 PUMP PARTS FUND NC 9199 Jl 01ST 6f0KIKG CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/16192 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNT CLAIMS PAID 04/22/92 POSTING DATE 04/22/92 - WARRANT NC. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 121707 JOSEPH T RVERSON A SON IN 3481.98 METAL 121708 SAFT NIFE INC 5116.30 ELECTRIC PARTS 121709 SAFETY-%LIEN COOP 9161.50 PARTS CLEANER 121710 SAFETY SUFFLY Of AMERICA $311.91 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 121711 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $567.44 VALVE PARTS 121712 DOUG SARVIS 5525.00 DRIVER/CPR TRAINING 121713 SCIENCE AFPLICATIONS IKT•L $08.896.37 OCEAN MONITORING H.O.6-12-91 121714 SEA CCAS1 CESICAS 5902.06 INSTRUMENT PARTS 121715 CITY OF SEAL BEACH - $169.50 WATER USE - 121716 SEARS ROEBUCK N CO $494.82 TOOLS 121717 SECURITY SPECIALISTS $160.00 SECURITY SYSTEM PARTS 222738 SERPERTIN CCRVEYCR CCRP $7.971.45 MACHINE SUPPLIES - - 121719 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1,458.16 TOOLS 121720 SILVERI G LE BOUEF 5142.561.68 CONSTRUCTION 5-34-3 121721 SKYPARK 6ALK•IN MEDICAL CLI $1.021.00 PRO-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 121722 ELIDE RASTER 5216.96 PRESENTATION AIDS 121723 SMITH-EYEPY CO 1874.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-17-91 121724 SONNENSCHEIN %ATM A ROSENTH $203.50 LEGAL SERVICES - PERSONNEL X 121725 SC C04ST AIR QUALITY 552.600.00 PERMIT PEES - S 121726 SOUTF COAST AIR QUALITY $12.221.30 EMISSION PERMIT PEES 121721 SCUTM CCAST 6AIER 587.50 EQUIPMENT RENTAL t" 121728 SO CALIF EDISON CO S2.000.OV EASEMENT 14-1-1A 121729 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO 5152,169.97 POWER 121730 SC CAL (AS CO $22.491.76 NATURAL GAS IA 121711 SCUT FERN COLNIIES CIL CC $13,391.38 DIESEL/UNLEADED FUEL 1 221732 SPARKLETIS DRINKING WATER $2.472.67 COOLER RENTAL/WATER 121733 VESTALLOY INC 5253.29 WELDING SUPPLIES - 121734 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS INC $376.52 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 121735 CAPRCLL C STARN G ASSCC 5501.17 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 122736 STAR IDOL S SUPPLY CC $2,124.90 - - TOOLS - - 121737 STONE CONTAINER $3,866.51 REFUND USER FOR OVERPAYMENT 123730 STRATAGEM[ $412.80 LAB SUPPLIES 121739 SIROMROIRE PRINTING $204.73 PRINTING - - - -- 121740 SUMMIT STEEL $1.857.41 METAL 121741 SUPLLCO INC 9459.27 LAB SUPPLIES 121742 SUPER CMEM CORP $670.80 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES - - 121743 SVPAKIEC CORE 550.02 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 121744 TEMPERATURE STANDARDS LAB $326.00 LAB SERVICES 121745 THPMPSOh INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $452.27 MECHANICAL PARTS ----_----- 121746 THCRPE IRSULATICK $81.43 BUILDING MATERIALS 121747 TCKY•S LECH L SAFE SERVICE 1118.4E SECURITY LOCK 121748 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE INC $62.50 SAFETY SUPPLIES - - - - ---- 121749 TRAVEL TRAVEL 51.050.50 TRAVEL SERVICES M.0.6-12-91 121750 IRUCM L AUTC SUPPLY INC $184.07 TRUCK PARTS 121751 JG TUCKER A SCN INC 14.870.41 FILTERS - - - - -- 121752 TWINING LABORATORIES OF 57084.00 SOIL TESTING FUND Nt 9199 . JT 015T 6(FKIRG CAF17AL PROCESSING DATE 4/161-2 FADE 7 _ REPORT NUMBER AF43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 64/22/92 POSTING DATE 01/22/92 -' WARRANT A0. VEKOOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 121753 ULTRA SYSTEMS 51.612.22 ENGINEERING SERVICES 121754 UNOCAL $72.05 UNLEADED GASOLINE 121755 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 1362.38 PARCEL SERVICES 121756 UNITED STATES ELEVATOR CORP 3454.15 SERVICE9 AGREEMENT 121751 UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS $119.00 SUBSCRIPTION 12175E VF.0 TESTING 13.000.00 EMISSIONS TESTING 121759 VLA SCIENTIFIC $2.252.71 LAB SUPPLIES 221760 VALIR CCRFCRATICR $2.743.70 FILTER 122761 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO $3.714.56 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 121762 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS S10T.75 LAB SUPPLIES 121763 VELIE CIRtLITS $2.530.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 121164 VER1U SVETEPS $1.690.60 COMPUTER DATA SERVICES 121765 VILLAGE NURSERIES 5133.24 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 121766 CARL WARREN R CO 3558.28 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 121767 WESTERN (CRPCRATE IMAGES 12,417.91 LAB EQUIPMENT 121766 WESTERN STATES CMENICAL SUFFLY 329.416.2P CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-8-90 121769 WESCO $1.249.94 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 191770 ■Fops CORP 51.702.62 COPIER LEASES FT7 121771 ZIERARTN 1 ALPER/C.S. ALFEP 195,608.00 CONSTRUCTION P2-62-1 3C 121772 ZIEBARTP AND ALFER $35.910.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-34-1 = 121773 RICHARD 8 EDGAR S200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION ----------------- TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 06/22/92 19.1113.316.63 bU 1 V SUMMARY AMOUNT NI OPEN FUND $360.48 12 OPER FUND $4,639.49 12 CAP FAC FUND $2,573.26 13 OPER FUND $34,035.67 13 CAP FAC FUND $1,104.00 15 OPEN FUND $5,270.66 15 CAP FAC FUND $165,345.60 16 OPER FUND $245.76 17 OPEN FUND $1,583.85 17 CAP FAC FUND /1,415.S2 111 OPEN FUND $7,366.26 113 OPEN FUND 163.8E 114 OPEN FUND $27.42 114 CAP FAC FUND $4,382.15 15G6 OPEN FUND $1,285.53 1566 CAP FAC FOND $182.26 17611 OPEN FUND $7,119.98 JT OPEN FUND $763,959.66 CORE 13,537,778.2E SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $114,535.93 JT WORKING CAPITAL $186,739.07 ___________________ ... t6,013,36E 63- STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954 .2, I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting on 194M was duly posted for public inspection NA at the main lobby of the Districts' offices on 19U. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have pereunto set my hand this day of 191 i. Rita T. Brown, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3 , 5, 6 , 7 , 11, 13 6 14 of Orange County, California �.r