Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1991-12-11
�PNtTATIpn,O, COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 4 av,um° 0 S J o OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 s 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 .e 195 pq'A'GE couN� (714) 962-2411 December 4, 1991 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 11, 1991 - 7:30 P.M. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California U The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. Secretary Tentatively -Scheduled Upcoming Meetings: FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - Wednesday, December 18th, at 5:30 p.m. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE u - None Scheduled COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1OB44 ELLIS AVENUE P.0 BOX B127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 927281,,� (714) 962-2411 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Meetings December Dec 11, 1991 January Jan 08, 1992 February Feb 12, 1992* March Mar 11, 1992 April Apr 08, 1992 May May 13, 1992 June Jun 10, 1992 July Jul 08, 1992 August Aug 12, 1992 September Sep 09, 1992 October Oct 14, 1992 November Nov 11, 1992* December Dec 09, 1992 Executive Committee Meetings None Scheduled Jan 22, 1992 Feb 26, 1992 Mar 25, 1992 Apr 22, 1992 May 27, 1992 Jun 24, 1992 Jul 22, 1992 None Scheduled Sep 23, 1992 Oct 28, 1992 None Scheduled None Scheduled *Holiday - New meeting date to be determined. BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 11, 1991 - 7:30 P.M. P.O. Box 8127. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA92728-8427 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 AGENDA In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in.Board Meeting folders) (5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. (6) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. (a) Report of Joint Chairman (b) Report of General Manager (c) Report of General Counsel `l✓ 12/11/91 (7) EACH DISTRICT ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman: _ District 1 - November 13, 1991 regular District 2 - November 13, 1991 regular District 3 - November 13, 1991 regular District 5 - November 13, 1991 regular District 6 - November 13, 1991 regular District 7 - November 13, 1991 regular District 11 - November 13, 1991 regular District 13 - November 13, 1991 regular District 14 - November 13, 1991 regular (8) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) See pages "A" and -� 11/06/91 11/20/91 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 703,736.57 $ 934,877.25 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 4,670,497.93 392,782.04 Joint Working Capital Fund - 147,962.22 325,046.98 Self -Funded Insurance Funds - 29,544.13 5,794.93 DISTRICT NO. 1 DISTRICT NO. 2 DISTRICT NO. 3 DISTRICT NO. 5 DISTRICT NO. 6 DISTRICT NO. 7 DISTRICT NO. 11 DISTRICT NO. 13 DISTRICT NO. 14 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT -2- 308.40 18,443.35 67,077.88 920.19 2,484.98 11,852.35 36,802.28 63.66 9,254.87 4,017.36 2,162.26 24.92 $5,705,153.35 1,.503.60 317,113.24 17,975.74 71,797.59 687.50 495,162.17 8,436.47 -0- 6,716.48 2,834.64 -0- 88.83 $2,580,817.46 12/11/91 (9) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 9(a) THROUGH 9(p) All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. The Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Motorola Communications and Electronics, Inc. for the negotiated amount of $45,624.00 plus sales tax, for Purchase of Two -Way Radio Equipment (Specification No. E-211). (b) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Brinderson Corporation in an amount.not to exceed $84,800.00 for Removal of Precast Concrete Parapets on Headworks B and C at Plant No. 2, Specification No. M-037. (c) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue Change Order No. 4 to Purchase Order No. 34691 issued to Office Pavilion/Interior Resources for Purchase and Installation of Administration Building Interior Office Partitioning Systems and Furnishings, Job No. J-7-5, authorizing a net deduction of $27,698.53, decreasing the total authorized amount from $1,049,210.69 plus sales tax to an amount not to exceed $1,021,512.16 plus sales tax. -3- 12/11/91 (9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT .CALENDAR Continued) (d) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 9 to the plans and specifications for Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17, authorizing an addition/ of $47,979.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for seven items of additional work. See page "C" (e) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, authorizing a deduction of $20,000.00 from the contract with Hunter Corporation for extraordinary costs incurred by the Districts to ensure that certain equipment meets the specifications. See page "D" (f) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Control Center/Operations and Maintenance Building, Job No. J-23-1, authorizing a net addition of $10,856.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for four items of added or deleted work, and granting a time extension of four calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page "E" (g) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 15 to the plans and specifications for Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33, authorizing an addition of $66,897.00 to the contract with Gust K. Newberg Construction Company for nine items of additional work. See page „F" (h) Consideration of the following actions relative to Gas Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-1: (1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order,No. 14 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of $10,123.00 to the contract with Ziebarth & Alper for two items of additional work. See page "G" (2) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 15 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing a deduction of $20,000.00 from the contract with Ziebarth & Alper for extraordinary costs incurred by the Districts to ensure that certain equipment meets specifications. See page "H" N -4- 12/11/91 (9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) 11✓ (i) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-3; Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-2; and Installation of Waste Digester Gas Flare Facilities at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-21, authorizing an addition of $48,734.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. for one item of additional work. See page ►' I ►' (j) Consideration of motion authorizing renewal of memberships in .the California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA) and the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) for the 1992 calendar year. DISTRICT 2 (k) Consideration of the following actions relative to Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue (including City of Anaheim Street Improvements), Contract No. 2-26-3; Katella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street (Ninth Street), Contract No. 2-28; and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29: (1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of $55,869.00 to the contract with Steve Bubalo Construction Co. for ten items of additional work. See page ►►J►► (2) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of $140,000.00 to the contract with Steve Bubalo Construction Co., for payment of contract -specified bonuses for early completion of certain major elements of the project which minimizes public inconvenience and traffic safety hazards. See page "K" DISTRICT 5 (1) Consideration of Resolution No. 91-184-5, approving Agreement for Exchange of Property with The Irvine Company, required in connection with construction of the South Coast Trunk Sewer, Phase 2, Contract No. 5-35-2, and the Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36. See page OIL" -5- 12/11/91 (9) DISTRICT 5 - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (m) Consideration of the following actions relative to Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with The Keith Companies for design and construction services required for the South Coast Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-35, and the Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36, providing for additional design services for improvements requested by the State: (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for said services. See page "M" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 91-185-5, approving Addendum No. 2 to said agreement with The Keith Companies for said additional services, on an hourly -rate basis for labor including overhead, for an additional amount not to exceed $45,107.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $161,250.00 to an amount not to exceed $206,357.00. See page "N" DISTRTCT 7 (n) Consideration of motion approving'Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Relocation of Michelson Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-2, authorizing an addition of $34,897.00 to the contract with Mitchell Pacific Constructors, Inc. for one item of additional work. See page "O" (o) Consideration of Resolution No. 91-186-7, approving Reimbursement Agreement with the Irvine Ranch Water District (.IRWD), providing for reimbursement of costs to construct and connect two District gravity sewers from abandoned Bent Tree Lane and Overhill Drive pump stations to IRWD's Harvard Avenue Trunk Sewer. See page "P" (p) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of City of Tustin dated November 14, 1991,. in an undetermined amount, for indemnity to include defense costs, attorneys' fees and costs of investigation relative to a claim filed against the City of Tustin by Oscar M. Flores in an undetermined amount for alleged personal damages incurred in connection with relocation of District sewers by CALTRANS as part of the construction on the Interstate 5 Freeway/Redhill Boulevard,`and refer to the District's General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any -6- 12/11/91 on (11) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee's written report of the meeting on November 20, 1991 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material). (12) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve staff Summary Financial Report for the three-month period ending September 30, 1991 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material). (13) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Report of the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee's written report of the meeting on November 21, 1991 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material). (b) Consideration of action on items recommended by the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee: (1) Verbal report of Committee (2) Consideration of motion amending the Districts' Water Conservation Implementation Plan, Phases I -IV, to delete the previously -approved Phase II - 10% Hotel/Motel Retrofit in Anaheim (1,720 rooms with Districts' share of the cost being $44,290.00); and to replace it with the proposed Phase II - ULF Toilet/LF Showerhead Retrofit Program in Anaheim. (1,000 rooms with Districts' share of the cost being $45,481.00) in cooperation with the City of Anaheim and the Metropolitan Water District; and authorizing payment to the City of Anaheim in an amount not to exceed $45,481.00. (14) ITEM DELETED (15) ALL DISTRICTS Report on proposed ordinances establishing wastewater discharge regulations and source control fees, administrative fees, non-compliance sampling fees and miscellaneous charges (See also Agenda Item Nos. 16 and 17 and enclosure included with Directors' agenda material): (a) Verbal report of staff and General Counsel re proposed ordinances. (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated November 19, 1991 re proposed ordinances. -7- 12/11/91 (16) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of the following items re first reading and introduction of proposed ordinances establishing wastewater,,,,.% discharge regulations: (See enclosure included with Directors' agenda material) (a) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 119, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District.No. 1 of Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations and Repealing Ordinance No. 113: (1) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15307 and 15308 in that the Ordinance establishes regulatory processes to be taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment and natural resources. (2) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 119 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (3) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 119 and pass to second reading and hearing on January 8, 1992./ (b) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 214, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations and Repealing Ordinance No. 208: (1) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15307 and 15308 in that the Ordinance establishes regulatory processes.to be taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment and natural resources. (2) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 214 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (3) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 214 and pass to second reading and hearing on January 8, 1992. [ITEM (16) CONTINUED ON PAGE 9] -8- 12/11/91 (16) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from Page 8) (c) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 317, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Establishing wastewater Discharge Regulations and Repealing Ordinance No. 311: (1) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15307 and 15308 in that the Ordinance establishes regulatory processes to be taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment and natural resources. (2) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 317 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (3) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 317 and pass to second reading and hearing on January 8, 1992. (d) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 526, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations and Repealing Ordinance No. 520: (1) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15307 and 15308 in that the Ordinance establishes regulatory processes to be taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment and natural resources. (2) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 526 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (3) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 526 and pass to second reading and hearing on January 8, 1992. [ITEM (16) CONTINUED ON PAGE 10] ME (16) 12/11/91 C ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from Page 9.) (e) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 620, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Establishing wastewater Discharge Regulations and Repealing Ordinance No. 614: (1) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15307 and 15308 in that the Ordinance establishes regulatory processes to be taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment and natural resources. (2) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 620 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (3) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 620 and pass to second reading and hearing on January 8, 1992. (f) DISTRICT 7% Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 727, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations and Repealing Ordinance No. 722: (1)'Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15307 and 15308 in that the Ordinance establishes regulatory processes to be taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment and natural resources. (2) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 727 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (3) Consideration of No. 727 and pass January 8, 1992. [ITEM (16) CONTINUED ON PAGE 11] motion to introduce said Ordinance to second reading and hearing on -10- (16) 12/11/91 ALL DISTRICTS (Continued'from Page 10) (g) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 1116, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations and Repealing Ordinance No. 1110: (1) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15307 and 15308 in that the Ordinance establishes regulatory processes to be taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment and natural resources. (2) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 1116 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (3) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 1116 and pass to second reading and hearing on January 8, 1992. (h) DISTRICT 13 Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 1311, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations and Repealing Ordinance No. 1305: (1) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15307 and 15308 in that the Ordinance establishes regulatory processes to be taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment and natural resources. (2) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 1311 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (3) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 1311 and pass to second reading and hearing on January 8, 1992. [ITEM (16) CONTINUED ON PAGE 12] -11- (16) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from Page 11) 12/11/91 (i) DISTRICT 14 Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 1403, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California; Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations and Repealing Ordinance No. 1402: (1) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15307 and 15308 in that the Ordinance establishes regulatory processes to be taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment and natural resources. (2) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 1403 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (3) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 1403 and pass to second reading and hearing on January 8, 1992. (17) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of the following items re first reading and introduction of proposed ordinances establishing source control fees, administrative fees, non-compliance sampling fees and miscellaneous charges: (See enclosure included with Directors agenda material) (a) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 120, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges: (1) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies,.equipment and materials. (2) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 120 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (3) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 120 and pass to second reading and hearing on January 8, 1992. [ITEM (17) CONTINUED ON PAGE 13] -12- ' 12/11/91 (17) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from Page 12) (b) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 215, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges: (1) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. (2) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 215 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (3) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 215 and pass to second reading and hearing on January 8, 1992. (c) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 318, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County �.�✓ Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges: (1) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. (2) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 318 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (3) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 318 and pass to second reading and hearing on January 8, 1992. [ITEM (17) CONTINUED ON PAGE 14] on -13- 12/11/91 (17) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from Page 13) (d) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 527, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges: (1) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. (2) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 527 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (3) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 527 and pass to second reading and hearing on January 8, 1992. (e) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 621, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges: (1) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. (2) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 621 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (3) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 621 and pass to second reading and hearing on January 8, 1992. [ITEM (17) CONTINUED ON PAGE 15] �ar�d -14- 12/11/91 (17) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from Page 14) (f) DISTRICT 7 �..✓ Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 728, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges: (1) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. (2) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 728 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (3) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 728 and pass to second reading and hearing on January 8, 1992. (g) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 1117, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges: (1) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. (2) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 1117 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (3) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 1117 and pass to second reading and hearing on January 8, 1992. [ITEM (17) CONTINUED ON PAGE 161 -15- 12/11/91 1. (17.) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from Page 15) (h) DISTRICT 13 1 I Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance �a.s� No. 1312, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges: (1) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses.and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. (2) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 1312 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (3) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 1312 and pass to second reading and hearing on January 8, 1992. (i) DISTRICT 14 Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 1404, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges: (1) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. (2) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 1404 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (3) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 1404 and pass to second reading and hearing on January 8, 1992. -16- 12/11/91 (18) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of actions re settlement of dispute between Districts and Brinderson Corporation re construction of Central \114.� Power Generation System at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-19-2: (19) nn (20) (21) �v1 (a) Verbal report of staff and General Counsel (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file confidential Staff Report dated December 5, 1991 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material). (c) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 8 to the plans and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-19-2, authorizing a net addition of $409,111.00 to the contract with Brinderson Corporation for six items of added or deleted work, and granting a time extension of 200 calendar days for completion of said additional work. ALL DISTRICTS Closed Session: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards, the Chairman may convene the Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9 or 54957.6. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employee compensation; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as final actions are taken by the Directors on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary (b) Reconvene in regular session (c) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session. ALL DISTRICTS Other business items, if any DISTRICT 3 Other business items, if any and communications or supplemental agenda and communications or supplemental agenda -17- 12/11/91 (22) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (23) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (24) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (25) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (26) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (27) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (28) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn (29) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (30) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn (31) DISTRICT 13 .Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (32) DISTRICT 13 Consideration ofmotion to adjourn (33) DISTRICT 14 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (34) DISTRICT 14 Consideration of motion to adjourn (35) DISTRICTS 1 & 2 Consideration of the following actions relative to Draft Supplement No. 2 to Program Environmental Impact Report on Amendment No. 1 to the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan relative to the Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30: See page "Q" for Staff Summary of said Supplement No. 2. (a) verbal report of staff/consultant [ITEM (35) CONTINUED ON PAGE 19] -18- • J 12/11/91 (35) DISTRICTS 1 & 2 (Continued from Page 18) (b) Public Hearing: (1) Open hearing (2) Consideration of motion to receive and .file written comments relative to Draft Supplement No. 2 to said EIR, if any (3) Oral public comments, if any (4) Close public hearing (c) Consideration of motion directing the consultant, Boyle Engineering Corporation/K. P. Lindstrom, Inc., to address any written or oral comments received on the Draft Supplement No. 2 to Program Environmental Impact Report on Amendment No. 1 to the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan re Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30, after the close of public comment period on December 31, 1991, and to prepare the final Supplement No. 2 to said Program Environmental•Impact Report for consideration by the Boards. (36) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (37) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn (38) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (39) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn cm*m MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS MEETING DATE P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 Wednesday, December 11, 1991 at 7:30 p.m. The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non -routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting. ALL DISTRICTS 9(a): PURCHASE OF TWO-WAY RADIO EQUIPMENT, SPECIFICATION NO. E-211. The Districts' two-way radio system is essential for our operations as it provides around -the -clock communications between operations and maintenance personnel within the expansive plant sites; and the trunk sewer crews, the source control inspectors and the construction inspection personnel in the field. This system is especially critical in emergency situations. The Districts' existing system is manufactured by Motorola Communications and Electronics, Inc. and has proven to be highly reliable during both routine operations and emergencies. The Districts presently have a maintenance agreement with the County of Orange Communications Division to install, maintain and repair the equipment. The County's repair facilities and test equipment are set up to service Motorola equipment, which is also used exclusively by the County. Based on added equipment required to meet expanding service requirements and the need to replace worn out equipment, 54 various pieces of radio equipment are needed. Staff has negotiated a price with Motorola for 30 pagers, 13 portables (walkie-talkies) and 11 vehicle radio Convert -A -Corns. The unit prices on requested radio equipment are the same as identical equipment purchased the last two fiscal years. Staff requests authorization for Purchase of Two -Way Radio Equipment, Specification No. E-211, for the Districts' communication system from Motorola Communications and Electronics, Inc, at a negotiated price of $45,624.00, plus sales tax. The 1991/92 equipment budget includes $62,375.00 for this equipment. December 11, 1991 �- F 9(b): AUTHORIZING PURCHASE ORDER TO BRINDERSON CORPORATION FOR REMOVAL OF PRECAST CONCRETE PARAPETS ON HEADWORKS B AND C AT PLANT NO. 2, SPECIFICATION NO. M-037. Headworks B and C at Plant No. 2 have been identified by Dames & Moore, our consultant on seismic improvements, as being in urgent need of remedial work in order to bring them to a condition whereby they could withstand a major earthquake. The precast concrete parapets on Headworks C have been identified as safety hazards which could fall off in the event an earthquake of moderate strength occurs. Dames & Moore has therefore recommended that they be removed as soon as possible in order to injury to an employee or damage to equipment. Staff solicited bids from three contractors with on -site equipment that could perform this work immediately. The bids ranged from a low of $84,800.00 to a high of $193,700.00. Staff recommends that a purchase order be issued to Brinderson Corporation for Removal of Precast Concrete Parapets on Headworks B and C at Plant No. 2, Specification No. M-037, in the total amount of $B4,800.00. 9(c): APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 TO PURCHASE ORDER NO. 34691 WITH OFFICE PAVILION INTERIOR RESOURCES FOR ADMINISTRATION BUILDING INTERIORS, RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. J-7-5. Job No. J-7-5 provides for the furnishing and installation of all interior office space systems by Office Pavilion/Interior Resources Company. This system includes all full height partitions with doors, variable -height partition wall systems and furniture for both the new and remodeled sections of ~' the 40,000 square foot Administration Building at Reclamation Plant No. 1. The new administration building addition and rehabilitation of the old section was designed over four years ago. Since the original design was completed, requirements for the office interior space systems have undergone a number of changes. Change Order No. 4 provides for additional modifications required to accommodate the present needs and provide for better current utilization of the interior building spaces, for a net deduction of $27,698.53 from the contract. Added items include $4,723.40 for the following: In the main entrance lobby area, partitions were raised to screen the office areas from public view and to lower noise levels. An additional office was added to the area occupied by the Source Control Division and an open area was enclosed with a full height partition and door. The Operations Division required a side light for safety going into an open space area. Xerox, fax and other office equipment was required to be screened from public view with additional partitions. In the Engineering Department area, the permit counter and walls were modified for better access to construction plans and issuance of permits to the public. Deleted items include the following: The deletion of specified painting of existing file cabinets inside the Administration Building resulted in a credit of $11,000.00. Most cabinets were reused in other buildings and repainting was not required. The return of excess product not used in the furnishing and installation of the office partition systems resulted in a credit of $21,421.93. IFAI December 11, 1991 Staff recommends that the Directors approve Change Order No. 4 to Purchase Order No. 34691 with Interior Resources for a net $27,698.53 decrease ..� in the authorized amount of the Purchase Order from $1,049,210.69 to $1,021,512.16, plus sales tax. 9(d): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 9 TO CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17. Job No. J-17, Central Laboratory, provides for the construction of a new laboratory, upgrading of the site paving, and provisions for additional parking at a cost of $7.9 million. Change Order No. 9 adds seven items of work for an addition of $47,979.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation. Item 1, in the amount of $17,519.00, provides for the installation of additional night lighting in the west parking lot and along the drive on the north side of the Central Laboratory. Item 2, in the amount of $14,655.00, provides for the installation of an offsite fire alarm conduit along the north side of the Central Laboratory as required by the City of Fountain Valley Fire Department for a complete fire alarm detection system for the protection of all support buildings. Item 3, in the amount of $3,015.00, provides for the installation of a lighted exit sign at the east exit, bonding of pipes in electrical equipment rooms and modifications to electrical panels to ensure electrical safety requirements are met. Item 4, in the amount of $4,983.00, provides for the installation of telephone and computer conduits in Room 122 as required for future heavy office use of this room. The installation of the conduits was recommended by the Information Services Department to avoid higher additional costs to the Districts for future installation of computer and telephone equipment. Item 5, in the amount of $1,614.00, provides for the increase in size and number of interior signs to be installed to bring these signs into conformance with other signs in Districts' offices. Item 6, in the amount of $3,373.00, provides for the addition of door stop and hold open devices to the trash enclosure doors to prevent damage, modification and installation of safety handrails at the revised loading dock and addition of a balancing device to the water system to enhance its operation. Item 7, in the amount of $2,820.00, provides for the addition of a drinking fountain with necessary plumbing on the first floor. The above -described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items are for replaced work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 9 for an addition of $47,979.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation. There is no time extension associated with this change order. 9(e): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 TO CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. J-19-1. Job No. J-19-1, Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, is part of the $66 million master -planned Central Power Generation Systems which are being built under several contracts at both plants. This $15.5 million contract includes installation of three pre -purchased digester gas burning, spark -ignited, 3472 horsepower engines with generators which are each capable of producing 2500 KW of electrical power. Change Order No. 5 includes one item providing a net credit of $20,000.00 to the contract. 59D December 11, 1991 This item of work provides a credit in the amount of $20,000.00 to compensate the Districts for extraordinary staff and consultant time charges necessary for review of Toshiba medium voltage switchgear. Staff is spending 1%.NWI more time than would have been spent on switchgear manufactured by other, more established manufacturers, to insure that the switchgear design and quality control meet Districts' requirements. This change order reimburses the Districts for this extra review. (See also separate report re Agenda Item No. 18.) Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 5 for a deduction of $20,000.00 from the contract with Hunter Corporation. There is no time extension associated with this change order. 9(f): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO CONTROL CENTER/OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. J-23-1. Job No. J-23-1, Control Center/Operations and Maintenance Building at Reclamation Plant No. 1, includes construction of a new 25,000 square foot two-story building with a basement, a new 2,500 square foot electric cart garage and related site work at a cost of $3.7 million. Change Order No. 2 adds $10,856.00 and four calendar days to the contract for four items of added or deleted work. Item 1, in the amount of $4,705.00, is for the addition of ten fire alarm strobe units required by the City of Fountain Valley Department in order to provide a visual warning device for the hearing impaired. Item 2 is a credit in the amount of $2,800.00 for the replacement of dark bronze anodized finish with a clear anodized finish for the "storefront" and "projection" window frames. This change will provide a closer match to existing adjacent buildings. Item 3 is a credit in the amount of $3,000.00 for deletion of recessed entrance mats and frames. Item 4, in the amount of $11,951.00 and a four -day time extension, is for realignment of the tunnel connecting the basement with Tunnel No. 8. The Control Center building was moved 12 feet west of the original contract -specified location because of a conflict with underground utilities. The above -described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items are for replaced work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 for a net addition of $10,856.00 and a time extension of four calendar days to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation. 9(g): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 15 TO PRIMARY CLARIFIERS NOS. 6-15 AND RELATED FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-33. Job No. P1-33, Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, includes the construction of a new 60 mgd primary treatment facility and a new large diameter effluent piping network at a cost of $41.1 million, the largest single project ever awarded by the Districts. Change Order No. 15 adds $66,897.00 to the contract for nine items of additional work. Item 1 involves adding additional damp -proofing coatings to the east and west scum gallery exterior walls at a cost of $6,098.00. The contract did not lftwwwl provide for damp -proofing in this area, but it was added to prevent groundwater -4- December 11, 1991 seepage into a dry tunnel. Item 2, in the amount of $825.00, is for extra work required to grade and stabilize an area flooded the night before for a drilling �.. rig to perform subsurface work (not a part of this project). Item 3, for $15,957.00, involved the removal of unsuitable soils where a large thrust block for the two 90-inch RCP fittings located near the splitter box was to be cast. The location of the unsuitable soils was unforeseen and our soils consultant recommended removal and replacement with rock for proper thrust block support. Item 4 involved the removal of excess concrete at the existing secondary aeration basin footings at a cost of $4,703.00. The excess concrete conflicted with the installation of the contract specified RCP in this area. Item 5, for $5,715.00, is for modification to the foul air ductwork in the splitter box. This modification was required to avoid conflict with concrete support beams in the splitter box and also to allow for the future removal of precast concrete troughs. Item 6, for $5,562.00, involved the raising of five existing manholes located adjacent to roadways paved in this contract. The five manholes were not in the contract work areas and were not shown to be raised on the contract drawings, but were required to be raised to accommodate new paving grades. Item 7 is for the repair of two existing electrical ductbanks at a cost of $14,812.00. While excavating for the 108-inch RCP, the Contractor encountered and damaged two electrical ductbanks not shown on the contract drawings. The referenced ductbanks supply power to the Orange County Water District's influent pumps which are located on OCSD property. The required repair involved extra costs for wire, conduit and concrete encasement. Item 8, for $5,586.00, is for modifications to the platform and stairs in the metering structure. The modifications were required to properly access the transducer flow meter in the 90-inch RCP which is located in the metering structure. Item �-- 9 is the modification of the deck and equipment platform located at the roof of the Waste Sidestream Pump Station (WSSPS) at a cost of $7,639.00. These modifications were required for adequate support of the specified supply fans located on the WSSPS roof deck but were not shown on the contract drawings. The above -described change would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items included in this change order are for replaced work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 15 for an addition of $66,897.00 to the contract with Gust K. Newberg Construction Co. There is no time extension associated with this change order. 9(h): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDERS NOS. 14 AND 15 TO GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-1. Job No. P1-34-1, Gas Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, includes the construction of a new city water pump station, a new power building, and a new gas compressor building at a cost of $13.4 million. The contract also includes supplying and installing three reciprocating compressors at Plant No. 1, and supplying three reciprocating compressors at Plant No. 2. Change Order No. 14 adds two items of work and $10,123.00, and Change Order No. 15 is a credit in the amount of $20,000.00 from the contract. Change Order No. 14 Item 1, in the amount of $8,483.00, is for modifications to an existing city water meter adjacent to the Plant No. 1 entrance. The -5- December 11, 1991 modifications were required by the City of Fountain Valley to provide connections for testing and calibrating the meter. Item 2, in the amount of $1,640.00, is for replacement of an interfering section of the industrial water line in Tunnel No. 3. The above -described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items are for replaced work. Change Order No. 15 This item of work provides a credit in the amount of $20,000.00 to compensate the Districts for extraordinary staff and consultant time necessary for review of Toshiba medium voltage switchgear. Staff is spending more time than would have been spent on switchgear manufactured by other, more established manufacturers, to insure that the switchgear design and quality control meet Districts' requirements. This change order reimburses the Districts for this extra review. (See also separate report re Agenda Item No. 18.) Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 14 for a contract addition of $10,123.00, and Change Order No. 15 for a contract deduction of $20,000.00 for Job No. PI-34-1 with Ziebarth & Alper. There is no time extension associated with these change orders. 9(i): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 TO CONSTRUCTION OF DIGESTERS NOS. 11-16 AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-3; REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS 9 AND 10 AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-35-2; AND INSTALLATION OF WASTE DIGESTER GAS FLARE FACILITIES AT PLANTS 1 AND 2, JOB NO. J-21. This $27.3 million project includes the construction of new Digesters 11-16 (Job No. P1-34-3), the rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 (Job No. P1-35-2) and the construction of new digester gas flare facilities at Plants 1 and 2 (Job No. J-21). Change Order No. 5 adds $48,734.00 for one item of increased work on the PI-35-2 contract. Item 1, in the amount of $48,734.00, is for the removal of 520 additional cubic yards of sludge and grit from Digester No. 9. The contract specifications stated that 3,000 cubic yards of sludge and grit were required to be removed from the digester. This amount was an estimate, made while the digester was in service. After the digester was removed from service, 3,520 yards of grit and sludge were found. The above -described change would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase and is not for replaced work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 5 for an addition of $48,734.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. There is no time extension associated with this change order. 9(j): RENEWAL OF MEMBERSHIPS IN THE CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF SANITATION AGENCIE5 CASA AND THE ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE AGENC The annual fees for memberships in these organizations are due each January. Our Districts' basic dues are approximately $2,500 for CASA and $12,500 for AMSA. 10 December 11, 1991 The CASA organization maintains offices in Sacramento and has an active program dealing with California legislative and regulatory matters affecting POTWs. Your General Manager is past President of CASA. The AMSA organization represents the large metropolitan sewering agencies at the federal level. A national office is maintained in Washington, DC, and their personnel are actively engaged in the many facets of the national scene. Not only do they work with the staff of numerous congressional committees and regulatory agency staff concerned with wastewater management and related activities, but their information service on current and pending legislation and regulations is extremely helpful to the Districts. Your General Manager is presently the Vice President of AMSA. Renewal of membership and payment of the annual dues for these two important organizations is recommended. DISTRICT 2 9(k): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDERS NOS. 4 AND 5 TO PORTION OF EUCLID INTERCEPTOR This project is the construction of a vitrified clay and two reinforced concrete gravity sewer lines and appurtenances. Contract No. 2-26-3, Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue (Including City of Anaheim Street Improvements); Contract No. 2-28, Katella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street; and Contract No. 2-29, Orangewood Diversion Sewer, in the total amount of $8.3 million, are located within the City of Anaheim and the City of Fullerton. Change Order No. 4 adds $55,869.00 to the contract for ten items of work, mostly undisclosed utilities, and Change Order No. 5 adds $140,000.00 for the contract -specified early completion bonus payment. Change Order No. 4 Item 1, in the amount of $13,357.00, provides for the connection of an undisclosed sewer lateral from the Garden Grove Library. Item 2, in the amount of $4,548.00, provides for excavation and protection of two undisclosed utility ducts. Item 3, for $5,144.00, provides for removal and disposal of an undisclosed abandoned concrete siphon structure encountered by the contractor. Item 4, in the amount of $15,920.00, provides for removal of an undisclosed concrete -encased steel casing which was encountered during the removal of an existing 30-inch sewer in Euclid Street. Item 5, in the amount of $1,130.00, provides for the protection of an undisclosed existing water line that was encountered by the contractor in Euclid Street. Item 6, in the amount of $1,857.00, is for the removal and disposal of an undisclosed abandoned concrete structure encountered by the contractor which interfered with pipelaying. Item 7, in the amount of $1,144.00, provides for the protection of an existing undisclosed storm drain box which interfered with pipelaying. Item 8, in the amount of $1,398.00, provides for protection of an undisclosed existing electrical -7- December 11, 1991 conduit in Euclid Street. Item 9, in the amount of $3,359.00, provides for additional work around and protection of undisclosed television and telephone cables encountered in the pipeline trench in Euclid Street. r, Item 10, in the amount of $8,012.00, provides for changing the location of an 84-inch manhole which interfered with existing street light conduits in the plan location. This item also included partial relocation of a new 24-inch sewer that terminated at the originally planned manhole location. The above -described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items are for replaced work. Change Order No. 5 This item provides for a bonus payment as specified in Contract Specification Section 52-108 (Sections 5 and 6). The specifications allow for a bonus of $2,000.00 for each day of early completion for this pipeline section. This is a standard provision in our sewer contracts to expedite work to minimize disruption to the public and traffic problems caused by major public works construction. The work was completed 70 days early at $2,000.00 per day which resulted in a bonus payment of $140,000.00. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 4 for an addition of $55,869.00; and Change Order No. 5 for an addition of $140,000.00 to the contract with Steve Bubalo Construction. There is no time extension associated with these change orders. [Ej&W19919V 9(1): APPROVE AGREEMENT WITH THE IRVINE COMPANY RE EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY FOR CRYSTAL COVE PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-36. The Irvine Company (TIC) is developing coastal land southeast of the community of Corona del Mar within District No. 5. The new development will be served by the South Coast Trunk Sewer (Phase 1, Contract No. 5-35-1, of the sewer is completed between Corona del Mar to a point south of Newport Coast Drive; Phase 2, Contract No. 5-35-2, between south of Newport Coast Drive and the Crystal Cove Pump Station is under design), and the Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36. Additional easements and fee owned parcels for the new pipelines and pump station are required for the proposed sewerage systems being built under Contracts Nos. 5-35-2 and 5-36. The Irvine Company previously granted County Sanitation District No. 5 a parcel for the pump station by a grant deed recorded on March 2, 1977. However, because Pacific .Coast Highway (PCH) is now being realigned and a 100-foot wide scenic corridor parallel to PCH added, the Crystal Cove Pump Station site must be constructed further inland. The Irvine Company is proposing to dedicate new parcels not in conflict with the revised PCH alignment at no cost to the District and requests that the existing pump station site be quitclaimed. In order to proceed with the construction of the necessary regional sewer facilities to serve the down coast development, an Agreement for Exchange of �, Property is proposed with The Irvine Company for acceptance of a grant deed for 10 December 11, 1991 a new pump station site, approval of an access easement agreement for the new pump station site and acceptance of an easement deed for the new sewer line in return for a quitclaim deed to be executed by District for the old pump station site, in form approved by General Counsel. Staff and General Counsel both recommend approval of the exchange agreement. 9(m): RECEIVE AND FILE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND APPROVE ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE KEITH COMPANIES FOR ADDITIONAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES RE SOUTH COAST TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 5-35, AND CRYSTAL COVE PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-36. The same Irvine Company project described above under Agenda Item No. 9 0) also requires changes in previously proposed drainage plans and redesign of portions of the facilities as well as additional design needed to obtain permits for the Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36. In June, the Directors authorized the Selection Committee to solicit a proposal and negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with The Keith Companies for additional design and construction services necessary for the completion of Contracts Nos. 5-35 and 5-36. The request for authorization was made because the California Department of Fish and Game will not permit the construction of the pump station without inclusion in the plans for landscaping using native species for the displaced and flora and additional erosion control measures to protect the natural drainage course through the pump station site. (The landscaping had originally been planned to be a separate project after the pump station completion.) Other changes include the addition of a sewer for the State of California (added at State expense), and site redesign necessary because of drainage changes. The Directors will recall that this project is funded by the Irvine Ranch Water District under a previously approved agreement. The Selection Committee has negotiated Addendum No. 2 to Services Agreement with The Keith Companies for the additional services on an hourly -rate basis including labor and overhead, additional contract amount of $45,107.00, as follows: Existing Agreement Direct Labor, (hourly rates including labor and overhead), not to exceed $142,050 Direct Expenses, at cost, not to exceed Subconsultants Fees, not to exceed Fixed Profit Total, not to exceed 6,000 13,200 $161,250 -9- Proposed Addn. No. 2 $45,107 0 0 0 $45,107 the Professional professional for the Proposed Amended Agreement $187,157 0 6,000 13,200 $206,357 December 11, 1991 The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee Certification of the final negotiated fee for the above additional work and adoption of a resolution approving Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with The Keith Companies. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the agenda supporting documents. nTSTRTrT 7 9(n): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO RELOCATION OF MICHELSON PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 7-11-2. Contract No. 7-11-2, Relocation of Michelson Pump Station, provides for construction of an upsized and relocated sewage pump station, a sewer force main, and gravity sewers and appurtenances in Michelson Drive in easements from Von Karman Avenue east to Carlson Avenue, to serve new development all in the City of Irvine, at a cost of $1.8 million. Change Order No. 1 is for one item of work for an addition of $34,897.00 to the contract with Mitchell Pacific Constructors, Inc. This item provides for the construction of 280 linear feet of 12-inch Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) force main from Michelson Pump Station, in a southerly direction, across Michelson Drive resulting in a cost of $34,897.00. The cost for this work will be reimbursed in full to the Districts by IRWD. This second force main will allow the pump station to deliver water to either the Districts' Fountain Valley Treatment Plant (via other sewers) or IRWD's Michelson Reclamation Plant. In summer months, IRWD may have a need for additional wastewater for their reclamation program. The above -described changes would have been included in the original `%WW design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items are for replaced work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 for an addition of $34,897.00 to the contract with Mitchell Pacific Constructors, Inc. There is no time extension associated with this change order. 9(o): APPROVE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT (IRWD Since the mid-1980's, County Sanitation District No. 7 (CSD 7) has been planning to abandon several pump stations located on the eastern slope of the Tustin Hills, adjacent to Cowan Heights and Lemon Heights. The most economical way is to build gravity sewers which connect the existing CSD 7 pump stations to the Irvine Ranch Water District's (IRWD) new Harvard Avenue Trunk Sewer (HATS), thereby allowing the abandonment of the pump stations. The HATS sewer is currently under design and construction. It is advantageous to have two of the connecting laterals constructed as a part of the IRWD construction contract for HATS. Staff believes CSD 7 will realize a cost saving due to the work being done under a larger construction project. Therefore, a reimbursement agreement with IRWD has been proposed for the two connecting laterals for the Bent Tree and Overhill Pump Stations, at a estimated construction cost of $60,000.00. The action appearing on the agenda is to approve the reimbursement agreement between District No. 7 and IRWD in form approved by General Counsel. -10- December 11, 1991 9(p): RECEIVE, FILE AND DENY CLAIM OF CITY OF TUSTIN. The District has received a claim from the attorneys for the City of Tustin dated November 14, 1991, for indemnity to include defense costs, attorneys' fees and costs of investigation relative to a claim filed against the City of Tustin by Oscar M. Flores. The claim is for alleged personal and medical damages incurred while working in an excavation area which collapsed in connection with construction on the Interstate 5 Freeway/Redhill Boulevard under contract with CALTRANS. CALTRANS was relocating District sewers as part of the I-5 work. The amount of the claim is undetermined at this time. (Mr. Flores has previously filed a similar claim against the District.) The routine action appearing on the agenda is to receive, file and deny the claim and refer it to the District's General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. ALL DISTRICTS 11: REPORT OF THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE. The Fiscal Policy Committee met on November 20, 1991. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on its discussions and actions. 12: FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE THREE-MONTH PERIOD ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1991. Enclosed are the budgetary financial statements for the first quarter of the fiscal year. The Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget statements were reviewed by the Fiscal Policy Committee on November 20, 1991. If any Director has questions pertaining to the statements, please call Gary �-- Streed, Director of Finance, at (714) 962-2411, extension 2500. 13: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE CONSERVATION, RECYCLE AND REUSE COMMITTEE. The Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee met on November 21, 1991. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on its discussions and recommendations for consideration by the Boards. 14: ITEM DELETED. 15, 16 AND 17: ORDINANCE REVISIONS --WASTEWATER DISCHARGE REGULATIONS AND FEES. The staff is proposing revisions to the uniform Wastewater Discharge Regulations (WDR) for each District. The WDR regulates all dischargers to the Districts' service area through its permitting and enforcement provisions. The proposed revisions to the 1989 WDR will simplify and streamline the administrative and enforcement procedures; incorporate the EPA regulations that have been promulgated since 1989; incorporate changes and additions to the WDR recommended in the audit by the EPA, the State Water Resources Control Board, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board; replace "non-compliance fees" with "non-compliance sampling fees"; incorporate recent changes to state law pertaining to administrative fines and civil penalties; and provide clarification of various provisions in the WDR. -11- December 11, 1991 Staff is also proposing that a companion uniform ordinance be adopted that establishes fees and charges related to the administration of the source control program and WDR. These fees are presently established by Resolution of the Boards and the General Counsel is recommending that they now be established lftmwl by ordinance. Enclosed with the supporting agenda material is a staff report summarizing the proposed changes and copies of the two ordinances that will implement these changes; the ordinance establishing wastewater discharge regulations (WDR); and the ordinance establishing source control fees, administrative fees, non-compliance sampling fees and miscellaneous charges. If any Director has a question prior to the Board meeting, please call the Districts' Source Control Manager, Margie Nellor, at (714) 962-2411, extension 3800. 18: APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 8 TO CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-19-2. Job No. J-19-2 at Plant No. 2 is part of the new $66 million master -planned Central Power Generation Systems which are being built under several contracts at both plants. This $20 million contract includes installation of five pre -purchased digester -gas burning, spark -ignited 4167 horsepower engines with generators which are each capable of producing 3000 KW of electrical power, plus three pre -purchased gas compressors. Proposed Change Order No. 8 resolves a serious contractual dispute between the Contractor and the Districts on several items on this contract. The enclosed Confidential Staff Report dated December 5, 1991 discusses in some detail the reasons for the recommended change order settling the dispute for a cost increase of $409,111.00 and a 200-day time extension. Staff and General Counsel recommend approval of Change Order No. 8 adding $409,111.00 and 200 calendar days to the contract with Brinderson Corporation to settle the dispute. 19: AGENDA FOR CLOSED SESSION. From time to time it is necessary for the Boards to convene in closed session to consider purchase and sale of real property, potential or pending litigation, personnel matters or other matters which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act. In order to avoid a situation where a closed session is needed but does not appear on the agenda, this standing item is placed on the agenda each month providing for a closed session at the regular meeting, if deemed necessary by the Boards. DISTRICTS 1 AND 2 35: CEQA ACTIONS RE SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 TO PROGRAM EIR FOR AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE COLLECTION, TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES MASTER PLAN RE MEMORY LANE INTERCEPTOR, CONTRACT NO. 2-30. In 1989 the Directors approved the comprehensive, updated Districts' wastewater management program and master plan which provided for facilities necessary to meet flow increases and regulatory discharge requirements for the next 30 years. Also approved was a program environmental impact report (EIR) ,MWI -12- December 11, 1991 which addressed most of the master -planned projects. Contract No. 2-30, Memory Lane Interceptor, is a Districts 1 and 2 project which has significantly changed since the Master Plan and EIR were approved, thus requiring additional CEQA environmental review. In July 1991, the Directors initiated the process by receiving the Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment, and authorizing the preparation and circulation of Draft Supplement No. 2 to the Program EIR on Amendment No. 1 to the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan for the Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30, in compliance with CEQA requirements. A copy of the Draft Supplement No. 2 to the EIR and a Staff Summary of it, and comments on the Notice of Preparation and the Draft were received at the November Board meeting. Following a verbal staff report at the December 11th Board meeting, the actions appearing on the agenda for consideration are to receive and file any comments received on Draft Supplement No. 2 to the EIR, and hold the public hearing. Following the hearing, the consultant, Boyle Engineering Corp./K. P. Lindstrom, Inc., should be directed to address any oral comments and written comments received, and to prepare the Final Supplement No. 2 to Program EIR for Amendment No. 1 to Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan re Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30, incorporating the comments and responses thereto. The public comment period closes December 31, 1991. A Staff Summary and a copy of the Draft Supplement No. 2 were included in the November agenda material. The Staff Summary is included again in this month's agenda attachments. If additional copies of the Draft Supplement No. 2 are desired, please contact Jean Tappan at 714/962-2411, extension 5001. If any Director has questions pertaining to the Draft Supplement No. 2 to the Program EIR, please contact Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering, at extension 5000. JWS: jt -13- RE: AGENDA ITEM N0, 11 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS \✓ November 20, 1991 REPORT OF THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE Meeting Date: November 20, 1991 FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE: Charles E. Puckett, Chairman James V. Evans Don Griffin John Gullixson Evelyn Hart Peer Swan James Wahner Grace Winchell ABSENT: None OTHERS PRESENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10944 ELLIS AVENUE P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 (714)962.2411 J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of Maintenance Robert J. Ooten, Assistant Director of Operations Patti Gorczyca, Financial Manager 1. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE%CONTRACTUAL PROCEDURES In September, the Joint Boards asked the Fiscal Policy Committee to review the Districts' accounts payable procedures. This was in response to a report by the General Counsel pertaining to the overpayment of sales tax to Cooper Energy Services. At its September 18, October 16 and November 20 meetings, the Committee reviewed with staff the enclosed (white) report detailing at length the Districts procedures, the chronology of the Cooper payment, and recommendations implemented to improve internal controls. The following changes, including those recommended by the Committee, have been made to the procedures to enhance the internal controls over payables and to prevent a recurrence: A checklist (enclosed lavender sample) has been developed to ensure that all required terms and conditions are incorporated and that special payment or funding provisions are specified in every contract prior to award. Contractual payment provisions heretofore developed by the Engineering Department and General Counsel will be approved by the Director of Finance before a contract is awarded. Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 2 November 20, 1991 All purchase orders that confirm a contract or a proposal must have the contract or proposal attached. Contractual procurements of a non -routine nature have now been assigned to the Accountant instead of the clerical staff for payment. The Accounting Manager will review and explain the payment terms of each contract with staff or the Accountant. Instead of using standard payment logs, custom payment logs, approved by the Accounting Manager, will be developed for each such procurement, in accordance with the contract payment terms, sufficiently detailed to account for payments within the specific line item allocation of the authorization. Major equipment purchases will be processed on a progress payment form (attached yellow sample) similar to that used for public works construction projects, rather than vendor invoices to ensure that specific line item allocations are followed. Implementation of these procedural enhancements, to be continually monitored by staff, should prevent future incidents. 2. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, 1990-92 SERIES C COP ISSUE. Staff presented a brief overview of the process for determining the timing and sizing of the next 1990-92 Capital Improvement COP issue in the series proposed by the finance team. The Committee reviewed the enclosed (tan) staff report, which summarizes the staff presentation and anticipates an issue of approximately $100 million about April 1992. 3. THREE-MONTH 1991-92 BUDGET REVIEW. A. Joint Works Review. The Committee reviewed summary statements of the Joint Works Operating Costs (JO), the Joint Works Capital Improvement program (CORF), and the costs of the workers' compensation, public liability and health plan self-insurance funds for the first three months of fiscal year 1991-92. With one quarter of the year gone, 20.78% of the net joint operating budget has been expended. Net costs are up $1,651,000 or 18.87%, compared with the same period last year. This cost increase is primarily due to additional staffing and related salary benefit costs totaling $1,256,000; increased solids removal of $388,000; and additional electrical power costs of $215,000. Some offsetting Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 3 November 20, 1991 operational savings have been realized from decreases in chlorine and odor control chemical costs and reduced use of chemical coagulants. Increases in other categories make up the balance of net costs. Joint Operating costs are up 18.9%, however at the same time, due to community water conservation measures and the economic downturn, flows have decreased 17.485o. Therefore, the net increase in costs combined with a decrease in flows has resulted in a $153.96 per million gallons increase in the unit cost to treat and dispose of sewage, to $503.42 per million gallons. Joint Works construction projects for the first quarter are essentially on schedule, running at 17% of the 1991-92 budget. Work is far along on P1-33, Additional Primary Clarifiers at Plant No. 1, a $42.7 million project with 99% spent through the first quarter. Digester Gas Handling Facilities at Plant No. 1, a $14.8 million project, are about 89% complete. Work is also continuing on the $67 million Central Power Generation Facilities at both Plants. Construction of the facilities at Plant No. 2 is about 88% complete through the first quarter, and the Plant No. 1 facilities are about 39% complete. The engine generator sets for this project have previously been awarded and purchased under separate contract. B. Tax/User Fee Collections. �✓ At the last meeting, the Committee requested staff to prepare a periodic update on the status of property tax and user fee collections. The Committee and staff reviewed the enclosed gold report, prepared in response to that request, which compares the 1991-92 budget, the actual allocation and the year-to-date collections of these major revenue sources. The bulk of our property tax and user fee receipts will be received in December and April in accordance with County Auditor -Controller's schedule attached to the report. GGS:JWS:Ic FIN/FPC91/RFPC11.20-22 Enclosures Revised: October 17, 1991 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA STAFF REPORT \..O/ ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PROCEDURES AND J-19A ENGINES 10944 ELLIS AVENUE P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 (714) 9S2-2411 Staffing of the accounts payable function for the Districts consists of two Accounting Clerks, one Senior Accounting Clerk, one Accountant, the Accounting Manager and the Director of Finance. Payables are allocated to the Accounting Clerks alphabetically and to the Senior Accounting Clerk in the case of extraordinary requirements. The Accountant provides day-to-day supervision. Procedures The detailed procedures used by the payables staff for the processing of routine claims (salmon) and engineering/contractual claims (pink) for the past several years are attached to this report. No payments for supplies or services are made without a signed purchase order. The purchase order contains the terms of the purchase, including tax and delivery, the price and the authority to make the purchase. In the case of an order supported by a contract or a proposal, that contract or proposal is attached to the purchase order. All Board actions are noted in an authority section. As invoices or shipping documents are forwarded to the accounts payable staff, they are checked against the purchase order and processed. No payments are made without a certified shipping document. In the case of contractual services, such as construction progress payments or residuals removal where there is no shipping document, a sign -off is required from the appropriate manager or department head. Once the accounts payable staff has matched a purchase order, an invoice and a shipping document or payment approval, a warrant is processed. The warrant and the invoice are forwarded to the Orange County Auditor's office for audit and, if everything is in order, the warrant is signed and released by the County Auditor. Cooper Energy Services J-19A Engines Particular interest in this process and the apparent breakdown of the process has been generated by the inadvertent payment of sales tax to Cooper Energy Services. An overview of what went right and what went wrong follows: Authorities The Joint Boards authorized a Purchase Agreement with Cooper Industries Energy Services Group for the Purchase of Spark -Ignited Engines for Use in Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-15A, for an amount not to exceed $18,968,113. The Agreement specified delivery milestones for individual engines and other equipment between July 8, 1988 and January 21, 1989, spare parts and a maintenance contract. Progress payments were required in fixed amounts at fixed intervals, after the Notice to Proceed was issued by the Districts. Progress payments to be made before the receipt of any engines were to be collateralized by Cooper Energy Services through an irrevocable letter of credit. The letter of credit would always be sufficient to repay the Districts if the engines were not delivered. Accounts Payable Procedures and J-19A Engines Page 2 October 17, 1991 On February 10, 1988, the Boards authorized staff to negotiate Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement to provide for a price adjustment for equipment to be delivered beyond 1988, as a result of delays in obtaining the permits from the SCAQMD. The negotiated Amendment No. 1 was approved by the Directors at the June 8, 1988 meeting and provided a 6% per annum maximum price escalation for equipment delivered beyond August 1988, based upon the time lost in the SCAQMD permit process and changed the payment schedule from fixed dates to milestones for each engine as follows: Engines: 25% - Start of Manufacture of Each Engine 25% - Major Components at Manufacturing Site 25% - Completion of Machinery 25% - Arrival at Districts' Rail Site Maintenance & Spare Parts: $313,500/Yr. - For 5 Years Following the Operational Completion Purchase Order No. 38044 was issued to Cooper Energy Services on February 15, 1989, for a total amount not -to -exceed $18,968,113 in accordance with the Board Minute Order of May 13, 1987, the contract of December 31, 1987 and the Notice to Proceed issued February 9, 1989. There is no mention of sales tax liability in any of these documents. On February 15, 1989, Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 38044 was issued to incorporate the terms of Amendment No. 1. The delay in issuing the Notice to Proceed until February 9, 1989, caused by SCAQMD, resulted in an increased engine cost of $1,428,562 and a new maximum cost of $20,396,675. Authority to negotiate Amendment No. 2 was granted by the Joint Boards on October 11, 1989 and the Amendment was approved at the December 13, 1989 meeting. This Amendment extended the price escalation features of Amendment No. 1 to the five-year maintenance contract included in the original agreement. The effects of Amendment No. 2 were reflected in Change Order No. 2 to Purchase Order No. 38044 issued on January 2, 1990, as an increase of $47,250 to a total maximum cost of $20,443,925. Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement was approved by the Boards on January 10, 1990. This Amendment provided an additional $214,320 for miscellaneous modifications to the engine lube oil coolers, generators and heat recovery units, and extended the delivery date for this equipment. On February 26, 1990, the Districts issued Change Order No. 3 to Purchase Order No. 38044 to incorporate Amendment No. 3 and to increase the maximum cost to $20,658,245. U Accounts Payable Procedures and J-19A Engines Page 3 October 17, 1991 �.d The final change to date was approved by the Directors at the June 13, 1990 meeting as Change Order No. 1 to the contract. This Change Order added $10,000 for the upgrade 'of computer controls and extended some delivery dates. The total not -to -exceed cost was now $20,668,245. A corresponding Change Order to Purchase Order No. 38044 has yet to be issued. What Went Right The first two invoices were received from Cooper on March 3, 1989, along with an irrevocable letter of credit. The accounts payable staff recognized that this was an unusual purchase and brought everything to the Director of Finance. The Director of Finance, the Director of Engineering and the General Counsel each reviewed the terms of the amended Agreement and.established a procedure for approval of the invoices and the letters of credit. The Director of Finance developed a special payment log intended to enable the accounts payable staff to monitor payments to date against the Agreement. Subsequently, twenty-seven invoices were processed over the next 18 months with their appropriate adjustments to the letter of credit in accordance with the routine procedures and the special procedures for this purchase agreement. Total payments amounted to $19,053,495 of the $20,668,245 authorized. On November 8, 1990, Cooper faxed the attached proposal (gold) to the Districts. The intent was to have the Districts pay the sales tax on the $18,358,495 equipment purchase before the k% increase for Measure M became effective. Measure M would have added $91,792 to the sales tax. Cooper �✓ stated they would hold the invoices awaiting our approval. The fax was forwarded to the Director of Finance for review because of concern over when the tax was due. After close review of the Agreement and Amendments, the Director of Finance questioned General Counsel. The Director of Finance could not find authority in the Agreement or the Amendments to pay sales tax, nor could he determine whether or not the tax had been included. There is no mention of sales tax within the Agreement or the Amendments. It was clear that the tax could not be paid without an Amendment and a Board action because there was a maximum dollar amount authorized. Since the Director of Finance had not been on the Districts' negotiation team, he asked General Counsel who the negotiating parties had intended to pay the sales tax. General Counsel issued an opinion on December 18, 1990 that since the Agreement was silent, sales tax was the responsibility of the seller. The Director of Engineering notified Cooper Energy Services of of our position. What Went Wrong The payment log developed especially for this purchase agreement was too involved and complicated or not sufficiently explained for the accounts payable staff to adequately monitor payments. Although they completed the log, they also prepared their standard log which only compares total Accounts Payable Procedures and J-19A Engines Page 4 October 17, 1991 accumulated payments to total authorized payments. In this case, specific,„/ amounts should have been allocated to each engine and to the maintenance contract (tan). Failure to make these allocations allowed an improper payment to be made even though the total authorization was not exceeded.. Staff is accustomed to paying sales tax on all purchases of materials, supplies and equipment. Unfortunately, the accounts payable staff failed to review the contract or Board actions for references to sales tax. Despite Cooper's note that tax would not be billed without approval, invoices for sales tax were received by the accounts payable staff after all of the engines had been delivered. After the receipt of the engines, this purchase looked a lot like a standard purchase; no partial payments, no letters of credit. The invoices (green) were submitted to and approved by the Director of Engineering; the payments to date, $20,200,900.94 including these invoices, were compared to the authorized maximum payments, found to be within the authorized maximum, $20,668,245.00, and the invoices were processed. The approved invoices and the Districts' warrant were forwarded to the County -Auditor's office for review and the warrant was released. What Has Been Done to Prevent Reoccurrences The accounts payable staff, including the Accountant, the Accounting Manager and the Director of Finance, have been counseled collectively and individually on this issue. Performance expectations have been made clear and several changes have been implemented: . Contractual payment provisions heretofore developed by the Engineering Department and General Counsel will be approved by the Director of Finance before a contract is approved. . All purchase orders that confirm a contract or a proposal must have the contract or proposal attached. . The Accountant will review the payment terms of each contract with staff or the Accounting Manager. . Custom payment logs, approved by the Accounting Manager, will be developed for such procurements, sufficiently detailed to account for payments in accordance with the specific allocations within the authorization. Procurements of this nature have been assigned to the Accountant instead of the clerical staff. Major equipment purchases will be processed on a progress payment form, similar to that used for public works construction projects, rather than vendor invoices to assure that authorization and payment terms are strictly adhered to. REF:FIN/FPC91/SRGGS9.12-15 Attachments COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PROCESS Procedure History Effective Date and Resolution No.: Prior Related Resolutions: • Minute Order Dated 5/9/79 s Resolution No. 76-10 • Section 13 of Resolution No. 64-3 ♦ Resolution 86-81 Procedure Overview Authority: Government Code and the County Sanitation Act (Health and Safety Code Section 4700, et seq.). -- Purpose: To detail the processing steps necessary to the Districts' Accounts Payable process. Form s : Purchase Requisition Background: Upon certification and approval by the Director of Finance that the payment demands presented conform to a budget approved for the current fiscal year, an executed contract, and/or a specific Board authorization, and are able to be paid from an unencumbered fund, claims may be forwarded to the Orange County Auditor -Controller for immediate payment prior to approval by the Boards of Directors. Procedure Detailed The following details the Districts' Accounts Payable Procedure as initiated by a Purchase Order through the receiving document, the invoice, accounts payable voucher coding and accounts payable warrant processing and warrant procedures. Accounts Payable Process 1. Purchase Order Page 2 1.1 The first step in the accounts payable process is the Purchase Order which is initiated by the Purchase Requisition Form. 1.2 The Purchase Requisition is the means to 1) inform the Purchasing Division of the needs of the requisitioning department or division and 2) correctly identify the materials requested. 1.3 The Purchase Requisition should be prepared enough in advance of the date the materials or services are needed to enable the Purchasing Division to secure competitive bids and allow for delivery. The recommended lead time is weeks. 1.4 The Purchase Requisition (see Exhibit ) is a two-part form that must be properly completed by the requisitioning department. The supervisor approving the form retains and logs the goldenrod copy. The white original is then forwarded to the Purchasing Division. 1.5 The Purchasing Manual, Section 7, Subsections 7.1 through 7.14 contain a detailed procedure for the completion and processing of the bidding process, capital equipment purchase, purchase order and the petty cash and invoice processes. Sections 7.1 through 7.14 are included as Appendix A. The Section 7 procedures include the following subsections: 7.1 Purchase Requisition 7.2 Purchase Flow Chart 7.3 Formal Bids 7.4 Informal Bids 7.5 Capital Equipment 7.6 Purchase Order 7.7 Purchase Order Change Order 7.8 Purchase Order Flow Chart 7.9 Petty Cash 7.10 Petty Cash Flow Chart 7.11 Emergency Purchases 7.12 Follow -Up 7.13 Invoices 7.14 Surplus Property 7.15 Hazardous Material Purchases 7.16 Safety Shoes 7.17 Safety Glasses 1.6 Once the original Purchase Requisition is forwarded to the Purchasing Division, a Purchase Order number is assigned and a Purchase Order created. The goldenrod copy is forwarded to the Accounting Manager for account coding evaluation. Accounts Payable Process Page 3 1.7 The Accounting Manager then forwards the Purchase Order to the Accounts Payable Desk (Accounting Clerk). 1.8 The Accounts Payable Desk (Accounting Clerk) logs the Purchase Order into the Purchase Order Book. The log -in must include the Purchase Order number, vendor name and Purchase Order input date. 1.9 The Accounts Payable Desk (Accounting Clerk) then date stamps the purchase as to date of receipt. 1.10 The Accounts Payable Desk then files the Purchase Order into the Pending Purchase Order File. 1.11 The Purchase Order will be either of two types: 1) open orders and 2) regular Purchase Orders. The open order (or blanket order) is usually established for a specific period of time (e.g., one year or a not to exceed amount). The regular purchase order lists specific item purchases with an amount and a description (see Exhibit #s and ). 2. Receivers 2.1 The blue partial or blue copy of a Purchase Order is known as a regular type of receiver. The blue copy of the actual purchase order is the final receiving copy which is forwarded to Accounting (Accounting Clerk). 2.2 Receiving documents for blanket orders are packing slips from the vendor, which are coded by the Purchasing Division (see Exhibits and ). 2.3 Receivers are then date stamped with the date received by the Accounting Division (Accounting Clerk). 2.4 The receivers are then filed in their respective file cabinets, blue copies to Pending Purchase Order File, and blanket receivers to the Blanket File. 2.5 To file the receivers, the following steps must be taken: 2.5.1 Pending Purchase Order File 1) The receivers must be matched with the goldenrod copy of the Purchase Order. 2) If the Purchase Order is alone (i.e., without invoices or notes), attach the receiver to the back of the Purchase Order and place it in the Pending Purchase Order File. Accounts Payable Process Page 4 3) If the Purchase Order has an invoice or note attached, staple the receiver to the back of the Purchase Order and place in the Payable Pending Coding File. 4) If any documentation attached to the receiver could possibly be an invoice, attach it to the Purchase Order. The document attached to the receiver should be attached to the front of the Purchase Order and the receiver itself must be attached to the back. The entire package is then placed in the Payable Pending Coding File for analysis. 5) The Purchasing Department should be notified when a receiver has not been attached to a Purchase Order within two weeks, or by the next pay cycle. 2.5.2 Blanket Order Files Place the receiver inside of the blanket order folder. 3. Invoices 3.1 Invoices are attached to the front of the Purchase Order and placed in the Pending Purchase Order File for regular Purchase Orders. For blanket orders, both are placed inside folders in the Blanket Order files. 3.2 If the Purchase Order and attached invoice has an attached receiver, the entire package is placed in the Payable Pending Coding File for payment. If the Purchase Order does not have an attached receiver, the invoice is stapled to the front of the Purchase Order and left in the Pending Purchase Order file. 3.3 The Purchase Order may be matched by referring to the dollar amounts or item descriptions. As of November 1, 1990, any invoice received by Accounts Payable which does not have a purchase order number on it will be returned to the vendor for proper identification (see Exhibit for example form letter). If a match is not possible due to missing Purchase Order number, freight information; pricing amount, quantity or terms, the attached form (see Exhibit ) may be sent to the Purchasing Department for a Purchasing at the discretion of Payables personnel. The original invoice must always remain in the Accounting Division. 3.4 Any other discrepancies or questions pertaining to the invoice can be directed to the Purchasing Department (Buyer). 4. Accounts Payable Voucher _Coding 4.1 The Purchase Order package consisting of the Purchase Order, invoice(s), receivers(s) and vendor correspondence is removed from the Payables Pending Coding File for coding purposes. -- Accounts Payable Process Page 5 4.2 The invoice is then compared with the receiver and Purchase Order to determine if the bills match the items received. If the invoice matches the Purchase Order, it may be paid. If the invoice does not match the Purchase Order, it may not be paid at this point. 4.3 The prices on the invoice are then compared with the Purchase Order unit prices. If they differ, contact a buyer in the Purchasing Division. 4.4 Then review the freight on the invoice and Purchase Order. Two designations are possible: FOB Destination and FOB Shipping Point. Each are handled as follows: 4.4.1 FOB Destination - no freight should be paid unless otherwise directed by a buyer in Purchasing. 4.4.2 FOB Shipping Point - Freight indicated on the invoice should be paid. 4.5 Invoice with items purchased on or after December 1, 1989, must be checked for proper sales tax amounts. The sales tax amount effected July 15, 1991, is 7.759., in Orange County and 8.25% in Los Angeles County. If the new tax rate has not been reflected on the invoice, it must be added. 4.6 If the Purchase Order includes a not to exceed amount, complete the purchase Order recap sheet (see Exhibit ) and attach it directly behind the goldenrod copy of the Purchase Order. 4.7 If an invoice brings the total paid on a Purchase Order to within 90% of the not to exceed amount indicated on that Purchase Order, the referenced buyer should be notified in order that they obtain a change order, if necessary. 4.8 If all amounts match, all items on the invoice have been received, and the Purchase Order dollar amount has not been exceeded, the accounts payable staff member. Then initials the invoice next to the total amount to be paid, and completes an accounts payable voucher (see Exhibit ) including: 1) Purchase Order Number 2) Invoice number - not to exceed 8 characters on new system vouchers and 10 characters 3) Invoice date 4) Entry type: IN for regular invoices, CM for credit invoices 5) Discount Date - same as pay date if invoice allows for discount. The date should be highlighted in yellow. 5) Invoice amount Accounts Payable Process 5. 7) Discount amount (should be highlighted in yellow) 8) Pay date 9) Transaction Code - The following codes shall be used: NN - non -stock non-taxable NT - non -stock taxable SN - stock non-taxable ST - stock taxable 10) Item number 11) Fund number (e.g., 9199) 12) Organization or department number (e.g., 2230) 13) Account number (e.g., 619001) 14) Work order number (e.g.,'00072000) 15) Work element (e.g., UTL) 16) Quantity invoiced 17) Invoice amount/unit price Freight Coding Coding with regard to freight should be done as follows: 5.1 Non -stock (NN) and Non -stock Taxable (NT) items: 1) Fund - same as line item Purchase Order. 2) Organization - same as line item on Purchase Order. 3) Account - use #619701 4) Work order # - same as line item on Purchase order (see exceptions) 5.2 Stock Taxable (ST) and Stock Non-taxable (SN) items: 1) Fund - use #9199 2) Organization - use #2230 3) Account - use #619701 4) Work Order # - use 00072DOOO Page 6 Accounts Payable Process 5.3 Exceptions Page 7 If the fund number is 9104, 104, 204, 304, 504, 604, 704, 1104, 1404, 5604, the freight line coding is exactly the same as the line item on the Purchase Order. 6. Miscellaneous Coding/Invoices 6.1 Freight Freight is only taxable if it is 1) incoming freight, which is defined as freight from a supplier to our vendor, not from our vendor to us; unless 2) goods are shipped on the vendor's own truck. 6.2 Labor Labor is generally not taxable although in some cases it may be depending on the materials. The Purchasing Department (Buyer) can be contacted for necessary clarifications. 6.3 Sales Tax Liability Sales tax liability must be added to any item purchased if the vendor does not collect or include sales tax on their invoices (see Exhibits and ). 6.4 Purchases over $25,000 Any purchase amount over $25,000 must have Board approval and a minute order number (M.O.#) assigned to the Purchase Order. This number must be written on top of all involved invoices, at the time of vouchering (see Exhibit ). 6.5 Purchase Order Without Receiving Documents If a Purchase Order does not have any receiving documents (packing slip), approval must be obtained from the person listed as buyer or "coordinate with" in the description area of the Purchase Order, and the invoice which have been transmitted for approval. This invoice and Purchase order are then placed in the Payable Pending Coding File until approval is received. Upon approval, the invoice can be paid. 6.6 Voucher Payment Process 6.6.1 The voucher should be attached to the invoice. To do so, staple the voucher and a copy of the original back-to-back and the original in front of the copy. Accounts Payable Process 6.6.2 The amount paid and the line items for invoice payment, must be written beside a date paid stamp, on the front of the Purchase order (goldenrod copy). If the entire Purchase Order is paid with one invoice, write PAID and the amount paid on the bottom of the Purchase Order. 6.6.3 A copy of the invoice to be paid should be attached behind the Purchase Order package and stamped with the date paid for future reference. 6.6.4 If the Purchase Order is to be closed (i.e., no remaining line items or money to be paid), a diagonal line should be drawn on the Purchase Order from the lower left hand corner to the upper right hand corner and stamped with the date paid immediately above the description area. 7. Computer Operations Process The below presents the computer input instructions with respect to voucher input (under the new and old system, purchase order receipt/invoice screen, miscellaneous computer operations, and vendor number entry. 7.1 Voucher Input Directions - New System From the Main Menu, enter the following in accordance with the below sequence: 1) #6 - Inventory/Purchasing Subsystem 2) Enter 3) #3 - Accounting Menu 4) Enter 5) #3 - Purchase Order Receipt/Invoice Screen 6) Enter 7) 9199 8) Enter 9) 0 10) Enter 11) When Func: area is reached, enter the following: a) A - Add Accounts Payable Process Page 9 b) M - Modify c) I - Inquire (See Attachments #11, #12 & #13.) 7.2 Purchase Order Receipt/Invoice Screen Enter the following items in the sequence indicated: 1) P.O. # - the number of the Purchase Order for which an invoice is being entered. The system will automatically display the vendor name. 2) Invoice # - The vendor's invoice number 3) Date - The invoice date 4) Entry Type - The type of invoice being entered, one of two a) IN - invoice (this is the default) b) CM - credit memo 5) Due Date - this is a default 6) Disc Date - This is a default, unless a discount is actually being taken, in which case it is entered as the same date as the Pay Date. 7) This is a default 8) Inv Amt - Invoice amount 9) Amt Subj To Disc - This is a default 10) Disc Amt - Discount amount, if any, otherwise this is a default. 11) Paydate - Date of payment 12) Status - This is a default, H=Hold, return=no hold 13) After everything has been entered, you will be given three choices: a) A - Accept b) C - Cancel c) M - Modify 14) TR CD - Transaction code Accounts Payable Process Page 10 a) ST - Stock taxable b) SN - Stock non-taxable c) NT - Non -stock non-taxable d) NN - Non -stock non-taxable 15) ITM - Item Number lb) Fund - Fund number 17) Org - Organization (department) 18) Acct - Account number 19) WO/STOCK# - Work order/stock number 20) WE - Work element (if any) 21) Qty Rec - Quantity received (this will be skipped over and must be returned to on NN items for which the whole line was entered. Hit the shift and < keys at the same time to return to this section). 22) Qty Inv - Quantity invoiced 23) Inv Amt/Amt Unit - Invoice or unit amount 24) If you are finished inputting an invoice and wish to accept it, after the description area is entered through, a "T" must be hit before going to the TR CO field, at which point you will be given the Accept, Cancel or Modify choices again. 7.3 Voucher Input - Old System From the Main Menu, enter the following in accordance with the below sequence: 1) #7 - Accounts Payable Menu 2) Enter 3) 9199 4) #2 - Invoice data entry screen 5) Enter b) When the Func: area is reached, insert the letter: a) A - Add Accounts Payable Process b) M - Modify c) I - Inquire Page 11 7) Entry for the OLD SYSTEM is the same as entering blanket purchase orders in the NEW SYSTEM, with the following exceptions: a) A vendor number is input instead of a P.O. number b) Under #13, an invoice description must be entered. c) No transaction code or number is needed in the OLD SYSTEM (see Exhibits and for examples). 7.4 Miscellaneous Computer Operations The following instructions pertain to various miscellaneous computer operations: 1) The shift key hit in conjunction with the < key will move you backwards through all entry screens. 2) If you have input an incorrect vendor, or P.O, number in an entry screen and wish to go backwards, the shift and < key will not work, you must hit the shift and * keys at the same time. 3) When entering FREIGHT in the NEW SYSTEM the QTY REC should always be 0 (zero), this is to keep the freight amount from interfering with the quantities received in the inventory system. 4) Error messages must be brought to the immediate attention of a supervisor. 7.5 Vendor Number Entry Enter the following items in the sequence indicated: 1) Vendor numbers are usually assigned in the Purchasing Division, but sometimes it is necessary that they are created in the Accounting Division. 2) Look in vendor number book and place new vendor in alphabetical order in book. 3) Enter vendor number into computer system: a) #7 - Accounts Payable Menu b) Enter -� c) 9199 Accounts Payable Process d) Enter e) #1 - Vendor data entry screen f) Enter g) Func: - Function 1) A - Add 2) M - Modify 3) I - Inquire Page 12 4) Vendor No - Vendor Number 5) Name - Name of company to which the warrant is to be sent 6) Attn: - May be used as attention to or as extra address space if needed 7) Addr - street address 8) City - City 9) State - State 10) Zip - Zip Code 11) Phone No - Telephone number 12) Days Until Payment Due - Hit 0 (zero) for this area 13) Days Until Discount Lost - Hit 0 (zero) for this section 14) Enter through remaining areas and accept the screen 15) Place a 0 (zero) into the Taxpayer T.D. line for new vendors 15) If an address is not to be put with the vendor at this time, blanks can be entered using the space bar, and entering 99999 for the Zip Code. (See Exhibit for example.) 8. Accounts Payable Warrant Processing Once all invoices and vouchers have been input, the Purchasing and Warehouse Divisions must be notified that accounts payable processing is about to occur to assure that they can sign off their computers. If the Purchasing and Warehouse Divisions are not informed of this processing, and asked to sign off for a short length of time, any information they input d wring this phase of the processing can be lost or rearranged. Accounts Payable Process Page 13 8.1 Process New System Invoices a) #6 - Inventory/Purchasing Subsystem b) Enter c) #3 - Accounting Menu d) Enter e) #6 - Purchase Order flag update f) Enter g) 9199 h) Enter i) 0 A Enter Q Do you want to continue (Y) Once these steps are accomplished, the Accounting Menu will reappear. Then perform the following steps: #8 - Report & Process m) Enter n) 9199 o) Enter p) 0 q) Enter r) #3 - Process P.O.'s/receipts/invoices (hit Y) 1) Enter cutoff date - check date 2) Current fiscal year - Fiscal Year 1) Accept m) When to process 1) N - Now 2) 0 - Overnight Accounts Payable Process Page 14 3) T - Terminate n) 6o you want to spool reports (Y) 8.2 Process Old System Invoices Enter the following in accordance with the following procedure: a) #7 - Accounts Payable Menu b) #7 - Report & process c) Choose (Y) for: 8.2.1 Invoice Processing a) Posting date - check date* b) Process invoices through - check date c) *The first check date of every month, use the last day of the previous month as the posting date (all other dates are still the check date.) 8.2.2 Report selection menu. This menu will appear after you have accepted everything. a) Pre -check register (Y) 8.2.3 Print reports from the spooler a) #11 - Print spooler menu b) Enter c) #1 - List print files d) 9199 e) 0 f) E - End g) Change N (No) to Y (Yes) on the reports you wish to print. h) Change printer - N (No) i) Forms alignment N (No) j) Terminal #16 or #17 Accounts Payable Process 8.2.4 Final Processing Page 15 a) #7 - Accounts Payable Menu b) #7 - Report & Process menu c) Choose Y (Yes) for: 1) Auto -check processing a) Process checks through - check date b) Enter posting date - check date 2) Report selection menu a) Claims paid report 1) Check paydate - check date 2) Posting date - check date 8.2.5 Printing Warrants (checks) a) #11 - Print Spooler Menu b) #1 - List print files c) E - End d) Place a (Y) for reports to be printed e) Print two copies of the AUTO CHECK PROCESSING, and two copies of the CLAIMS PAID REPORT f) Accept g) Change printer - N h) Forms alignment - N i) #16 OR #17 8.2.6 To print the Accounts Payable warrants (checks) you follow the procedures listed above. The only difference is that you hit (Y) to the forms alignment and type CHEK for the form type 8.2.7 Month End Processing (should be done after everything has been printed and is correct) a) #7 - Accounts Payable Menu Accounts Payable Process Page 16 b) #7 - Report & Process Menu c) #5 - Month end processing - Hit Y 9. Warrant Procedures The following details the processing steps required with respect to the warrant drafting procedure. 9.1 After all of the invoices have been entered into the computer, the NEW and OLD SYSTEM invoices are processed (see computer operations). 9.2 Print a pre -check register, invoice distribution report, and a purchase order/receipt/invoices report/ 9.3 Check all of the invoices against the pre -check register for errors and omissions. 9.4 Make any necessary corrections and process the NEW and OLD Systems agains, if needed. 9.5 Check the corrections against the new pre -check register. 9.6 Run the final processing (see computer operations). 9.7 Print the check registers, claims paids and warrants. 9.8 The warrants are now separated: a) The darker green copy of the warrant is stapled to the back -u copy of the original (the one with the voucher attached to i T b) The light green copy is stapled to the original invoice. c) The original warrant is now paper clipped to the front of the light green copy and original invoice, this package goes to the Auditor's office. d) All (Will Call to District Warrants) are to be bundled separately from the regular warrants. e) The warrants, a copy of the check register which is signed by the General Manager, and the Director of Finance, and the transfer letters are placed inside an accordion file for delivery to the Orange County Auditor/Controller's office. 9.9 The closed P.O.'s are now checked for capital asset coding (9104, 104, 204, 304, 504, etc. and any P.O.'s with District tag assets on them) and a copy taken of all goldenrod pages of the P.O., and given to the Fixed Asset Section of Accounting. 9.10 Log out closed P.O.'s in the purchase order books. Accounts Payable Process Page 17 9.11 File all closed P.O.'s into closed P.O. files. 9.12 File all P.O.'s that are still open back into the PENDING P.O. Files. 9.13 The check register, pre -check register, purchase order receipts/invoices, and the invoice distribution are to be placed inside their proper handing files. 9.14 Two copies of the signed transfer letters are to be taken. One copy to go to the Accounting supervisor, and one to go to the Accounting Manager. September 12, 1991 PROCEDURES FOR PAYMENT OF ENGINEERINGJCONTRACTOR CLAIMS P.O.s' Must Contain the Following Information; -Boards Authority reflected by a Minute Order Number -Description of the contract -Contract number (if one was created) -Copy of contract or proposal for other than construction projects -Resolution number -Total not to exceed amount -Coding including fund, org, account & work order number(s) Payment of an Engineering Contract Invoice Procedure: -Invoice is received for the accounts payable desk. -Invoice is matched with the proper P.O. -Request the engineering agreement and payment history file from the board secretary's office. -First check the Agreement/Addenda folder for any new addendum not reflected on the payment history sheet. Add new addenda to the totals on the history sheet. If this is a new contract all the payment information can be found in the.compensation portion of the engineering agreement. --To prepare the invoice for payment you must do the following. Check all of the addition, check the overhead rate being charged, initial the total paid if correct, check all the back-up for the direct expenses and sub -consultants (there must be documentation for all expenses) and write the resolution number and the contract number in the upper right hand corner. -Next write the dollar amounts for the various categories (ie. direct labor & overhead, direct expenses, fixed profit) on the payment history sheet. The totals are not to exceed the amount allocated to each of these categories (if a category will be exceeded by paying the invoice, only pay up to the not to exceed amount and deduct the remaining portion from the billing). -Fill out an accounts payable voucher using the information from the P.O. and the invoice. -Make two (2) copies of the invoice. One is to go into the payment history file, after it has been approved by the Director of Engineering or the person listed on the P.O, as the buyer. The other is attached to the original invoice and has the payment voucher attache. -Give the invoice with a copy and the payment voucher to the accounts payable desk for payment. -When the approved invoice copy is returned, stamp it with the date paid and place it in the payment history file. -Return the file to the board secretary's office. Cooper Industries Cooper Energy Services 7152 Patterson Drive Garden Grove, CA 92641-1416 Sales 714 891-3496 �J✓`��...1 r-- �c� Aftermarket Services 714 891-3491 -r Fax 714 895-5904 00 April 16, 1991 COOPER County Sanitation Districts of orange, California P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 Attention Mr. Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering Subject: Electrical Equipment Purchase Contract Specification No. J-19A Dear Mr. Dawes: Mr. Ed Roper has researched the files on this project. In answer to your letter of March 27, 1991 he has listed the reasons why the sales tax was invoiced on the above subject project. Please advise if further clarification is required. Sincerely, Dean Manning DM:dk Attachment EM i LL1 �Ud ; 1 04/ 16/91 14 44 V412 458 9725 C. B. R£C i P. Z 001 Cooper -Bessemer Reciprocating (412) 458-3525 Fax (412) 458-3532 Phone Date: April 15, 1991 To: D. F. Manning - Garden Grove From: E. E. Roper - Grove City 5p�' Subject: OCSD ontract Sales !l111Y*M�.......A�w�R1A tetra r.�...•rr..l�Rrr. RAk I have nevi ed the question to determine the legitimacy of our invoicing for sales tax. I havd1concluded the invoicing was appropriate based upon: 1. Our December 19, 1986 proposal specifically states: Purchaser shaft pay all sales, use or transportation taxes or duties for which it may be liable and/or which the law requires the Seiler to collect. 2. Page 2 of the Purchase Contract refers to 'the proposal" in three different sentences, thus tying the two documents together. 3. On 1'1/8/90 you requested OCSD to pay the sales tax. This was communicated by telecopy. 4. On 11/9/90 you advised Grove City that Tom Dawes had agreed to accept invoicing for sales tax. 5. This tax ($1,147,405.94 in two invoices) was received from OCSD on 12/26/90. It was paid to the -State of California on ---- Please advise OCSD. EER:cmi IICOOPER•BESSEMER RECIPROCATING INVOICE ENERGY SERVICES GROUP Mail check In oavment to: P.O. sox 730343, DALLAS, TEXAS 75373-034: Oma O.Jf n D44tR e.15/89 ORANCN C•s RECIP.ORDER No. ACCOUNT No. INVOICE GATE INVOICE No. J-19-A Dated 12/31/87 SO 1064 626300000 11/13/90 1122209 SOLD TO: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728 SHIPTO: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California Wintersburg Rail Head Intersection of Gothard AVe. and Main Street Huntington Beach, CA GLC OCPT CC OVN sun•LEOOER COOL CR TO iN PR OTT momst rowtR TAIL IND COOL CLASS N AMOUNT sTATt CfTT 34212 174 9 1 00 R.O.t. ROUTED ❑ PPO ^1Tt s"Wrao ❑ COLL. CAR NO. ITOA OTT PART NUMtto OtsC141IPT1oN ORDER No. 10 PRICE sox I CODA TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $12,559,392.010 ssued to invoice Tax on equipmert ble: (L.A.) 61 VV TOTAL TAXABLE ornia Sales & Ise TOT TAXES N i $310,000'.00 125,000.00 `A-2+-5bOAc $12,559,392.00 447,500.'00 $12,111,892.00 X .0625 $ 756,993.25 This invoice is being California Sales & Use purchased. TOTAL CONTRACT'AMOUNT: LESS: Amounts NOT tax Freight Charges Service Representative Training Services 64% Cali OUNT: Tax: DUE: "IC.1 I ENERGY SERVCES GROUP COOf[II I1 .«,,... l THIS INVOICE NOT ELIGIBLE FOR DISCOUNT SPECIFIED BELOW. Unless specified above, payment terms are I % discount within 10 days: net 30. Unless otherwise prohibited by law, Purchaser agrees to pay interest on all oast due in%!^+irPc ref t I/. W no...,.....1. ... �• -�- "^ "" I COOPER•BESSEMER RECIPROCATING INVOICEENERGY SERVICES GROUP Mail check in payment to: P.O. Box 7303439 DALLAS, TEXAS 75373-, j =USTOMER ORDER NO. P.O. #38044-2/15/89 DRANCM C•B RECIP. ORDER NO. ACCOUNT NO. INVOICE GATE INVOICE NO. J-19-A Dated 12/31/8 SO 1127 626300000 11/13/90 1122210 SCIDTO: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728 SHIP TO: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California Waste Water Reclamation Plant #1 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92788 Attn: Jim Harris GLC DEPT CC OVM SUN•L[OGER COO[ CM TO SM IR OTY HORSE POWER TAX INo COD[ CLASS INTION AMOUNT STATE CITY 34212 SO 1127 002 1323 35 174 nna 390,412.6s P.O.E. ROUTED C MO C3 COLL. GATE SNIPPED CAR NO. ITEM CITY PART NUM[[R O[[C RIPTtON ORDER NO. ID PRICE •OX COD[ TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: This invoice is being issued California Sales.& Use lax purchased. TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: LESS: Amounts NOT taxa le: Freight Charges Service Representative Training Services 61A California $6,494,103.00 to invoice on equipment L.A.) 63', t TOTAL TAXABLE Sales & TOTAL 6XES $165,000.0 75,000.0 '"`7,�00.0 $6,494,103.00 241'100'00 $6,246,603.00 X .0625 $ 390.412.69 � AAA17 OU_NT: _ .. Use Tax.: DUE: V I ENERGY SERVICES GROUP \4j - P A V U--' UEU 191999 1. �M'r� �••� THIS INVOICE NOT ELIGIBLE FOR DISCOUNT SPECIFIED BELOW. Unless specified above, payment terms are 1 % discount within 10 days; net 30. Unless otherwise prohibited by law, Purchaser agrees to pay interest on all past due invoices of 1 1/7 0K, nPr mnnth nr at tho hinhoat allnwahla rate ar•r-nrr6— ter.ttwttwtttwwwwwwww*ww,r***w*w*ttt,r,�tww�r*wwwwt*r►t*t�rw*tttwwwwwww** TELECOPY MESSAGE FROM ENERGY SERVICES GROUP GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA New Unit Sales Office (714) 891-3496 TELECOPIER: (714) 895-5904 TO: Tom Dawes DATE: November 8, 1990 FAX NO: 714-962-5018 Number of pages including cover: FROM: Dean Manning SUBJECT: Generator Seta ****tl�tttklkwtk'k****lwwwfRwlkttlkYf74**�!'ir*k**ftltyt14w1Vw1k1M**'k�k7kwwwl�t*ww*iklM+kwlFw�r* Please review the attached and give me a call. It probably is beat to pay scales tax now before measure M goes into effect. Dean oM,ak i %r Nov 08,90 10R07 C-S RECIPROCATING ADMIN Grove City 412-458-8000 ext3371 F.01 TEL� ECOPY TO: Dean Manning LOCATION: Cooper Industries, Inc. (LA Sales Office) EXTENSION: FAX: 7if895-5904 FROM: Doris Reemtsen LOCATION: Grove Ci t - C•G Reci orocati n EXTENSION: (412) 458-8000, extension 3315 FAX: (412) 458-8000, extension 3371 (Finance) COMMENTS: See Below DATE SENT: 11/8/90 NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET); 3 Dean: Attached are two (2) draft copies of the sales and use tax invoices for Orange County. Even though service time and training services are not yet completed on this contract, we feel we could invoice sales and use tax on the equipment at this time due to the fact that service time and trainin services are exempt from the tax.' All progress billings have been completed. Please review these draft copies with Orange County to deta nnine if these will be acceptable should we submit them within the next few days. I await your response. Thank you. a Doris J. Reemtsen' Sales Accountant C-B Reciprocating, Grove City 'Lai cOoPMB r�+ RECIPROCATING INVOICE ENERGY SERVICES GROUP MOO Check In paymirnl Io. a.m sox 730343 s DALLAS , TEXAS 75373•034 �ul} oM11 g�gsN "!/ 15%$9 I♦RAMCM C•* midi•. owp;R No. ACCOUNT ,ea. INVOMd 4AT1 4ftWQ1C9 "a. 1 ,A Dated 12/31/87 So 1064 626300000 "" m County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P.Q. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728 •Ht• ra County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California Wintersburg Rail Head Intersection of Gothard AV*. and Main Street Huntington Beach, CA a4C 09" CC OvM live-L900110 Cop• CR To ON IR OTT man* POWCR TAR logo COOT CLAss ir RTC CITY AMOUNI 50 "J -.4.C. NOVTKO © 1�0 © 430166 OAYR SHI/hd CAN „o. 1w rT PART MVM@iR DLACRIPTION aN IG � RRICc TPTA_L CONTRACT'AMOUNT: $12,559,392,0 slued to Invoice Tax on equipme ble: (L.A.) TOTAL TAXABLE ornia Sales 5 Lse TOTAL TAXES NOI t $310,000.03 125,000.0 12,500.0 �12,554,392,00 4471500.00 $12,111,892.00 __.. X .0625 766,993.25 This fnvoice is being California Sales A Use purchased. TOTAL CONTRACT'AMOUNT: LESS; Amounts NOT tax Freight Charges Service Representative Training Services 64% Cali MOUNT; Tax; DUE: Ahm SOW eeRv= GROUP THIS INVOICE NOT ELIGIBLE FOR DISCOUNT SPECIFIED 8€LOW. Unfees specified ibcve, asvmrnt terms srs 1 % discount within 10 dave; net 30. Unieea otherwise ar Wblted bv lPw. EAC00"ABESSEPAER R1EOPFA=TINa INVOICE ENERGY SERVICES GROUP Mail check In cavment 1cr P.O. sail 730343, DALLAS. 'TEXAS 75373-03, L,aY�eJJ,� ewwM+:r1 C-8 RICCIP, A110aw MO. AC/JCOUMT INVOKE OwT9 IMVOIC( e��J%5�`]e�Q J' I9-A bated 12 31/t� Dated 50 1127 /MHO. 526300000 �✓ County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728 SNIP To° County Sanitation Districts of Orange Couni, California Waste Later scldmatien Plant 01 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92788 Attn: Jim Harris 4I.4 061111' CC 4VF1 aus-6900Et1 LGOR C!1 TO ON IraYTV "GONE TOWER TAX IN* COON CtAei � IM�I.IM1 004 P.O.S. ROWTRC a rr■ � 4�t■V DATE RMI"N2 CAN NO. y am CTT PART NUMNKw DaaC111fTe1lr afteew me. IsF o#fce TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: This invoice is being i California Sales-& Use lax purchased. TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: • 4• .w LESS: Amunts NOT taaxa Freight Charges165,000.0 Service Representative Training Services 6k% California $6,4940103.00 sued to invoice on equipment l e : L.A.) TOTAL TAXABLE Sales 6 TOTAL TAXES N04 75.000.01). 7,500.3 $6,494,103.00 247,500;00 $6,246.603.00 X;,.Q625 $ 390 41 CUNT: Use Tax: DUE: Lm ay sanvca oxaui; MEN. I THIS INVOICE NOT ELIGIBLE FOR DISCOUNT SPECIFIED BELOW. Untess specified above, payment tarms are 1 % 011Count within 10 dava: net 30. Uni111ea atherwisr n►nhihitsm hu in%— .......... 16%113'! cc * -L- MT ur *l. I-scp! to CVQ?C'L- _76L e-tEQ— y A-1 -f— % tf.�E`r-F'n 1 k,03%rr_ Lsftob-sbG LSQ,-%j-SGC_ RC -T. ar45Tt__ v+1,II L-,+E"-5 0 0. CRWIC AL 31 fA Coe— &&a 3 rr _LAI 4, 70 AI 6s �b. (gitj L olt-L-L�-S r -0 156 p SIM "1 00 NI s. 7 -L-Lj:)l 1,v '1 1 D 16 6-L, Oco -0 0.0 0-4 t� E4� i 11. 3 O!D — 01 1-vD -k 0.4 3-1 qp 00 L gro I r I a ml Ntt�, is 4-L L L,\ t 00 hh i I - I - . I �cl: 05 Ttmo� . VTl IQ ! I 10 C, nu III I - 1 Of.I vL4-1 I I- : r-I o Lo A< r k"EVI -W 24 10 L t, 25 12 26 LLLZ _31 27 as C'.0. A, a-z_z-L al 000 00, N1 ' -1 0 IV, 15 -'ho-093,775 24 -3, -,w" bl000 ID (I =1 A rL- I 4[lj '10 T_ E,Yl 13 �s 1,14.� 10/3/91 DRAFT STANDARD CONTRACT PROVISIONS Descriptions 1. Table of Contents Listing of all contract section headings and page numbers. 2. Summary of Contract Provisions A summary of key contract provisions, in particular payment terms (example is attached.) 3. Prior Agreement (if any) Identification and termination status of any prior related agreement. 4. Alteration of Terms Noticing and process requirements for additions to or alterations of the agreement. 5. Assignment ' Addresses assignment of any debts owing to the contractor or of the contract itself. 6. Attorneys Fees Specifies responsibility for attorneys fees in the event of litigation to enforce or otherwise regarding the contract. 7. Confidentiality Contractor requirements concerning confidentiality of all records, billing and any audio and/or video recordings in accordance with state and federal codes and regulations. 8. Cost Reporting Cost reporting requirements including frequency, actual report(s) detail requirements, and eligible or reimbursable costs. 9. Dispute Resolution Provisions regarding notice to contract parties of the existence and nature of any unresolved matter of concern related to the agreement and the specific process for dispute resolution. 9. -2- 10. 11. 12. 13 . 14. 15. 16. 17. Delegation and Assignment The terms whereby the contractor may or may not delegate the obligations of the agreement (typically to subcontractors) including noticing and consent requirements. Equipment (if applicable) The definition of equipment addressed by the agreement including equipment listing, estimated dollar amounts, useful life, replacement equipment, etc. Facilities Payment and Services Contractor requirements regarding services, staffing, facilities, equipment, supplies and reports necessary for compensation under the terms of the contract (may be detailed in an exhibit). Indemnification Each party's requirements to indemnify and hold harmless the other party, its officers, agents and employees from all liability, claims, losses and demands, including legal costs and duration of indemnification. Insurance Description of all contractor insurance policy requirements including specific insurance rider language, coverage requirements and certificates evidencing insurance (if necessary). Inspections and Audits The authority of all parties having participation or overview of the agreement or project to have access to any books, documents, and records for the purpose of conducting an audit, evaluation, or examination and audit cooperation requirements, as well as contract termination in the event of non-compliance. Licenses Contractor (and subcontractor) requirements to maintain all necessary licenses, permits, approval, certificates, waivers and exemptions necessary to carry out the terms of the agreement. Laws Contractor requirement to comply with all existing or amended or changed governmental laws, regulations and requirements as specified. 1*� -3- 18. Maximum Obligation The total maximum dollar obligation of Districts for services provided pursuant to the agreement and notice and approval requirements for increasing or decreasing any cost component. 19. Non -Discrimination (if applicable) Sets forth affirmative action requirements, if any. 20. Notices Requirements concerning all notices, claims, correspondences, reports and/or statements authorized or required by this agreement. 21. Payment Terms Specifies how any dollars being committed by the contract are to be allocated and when payment is due. Includes shipping and freight instructions and liability for sales 22. Performance Bonds Sets forth any performance bonds, surety bonds, letter of credit or similar security requirements to ensure contract compliance. 23. Revenue (if applicable) Provisions pertaining to any revenues received by a contractor pursuant to its performing services under the agreement. 24. Records Specifies contractor recordkeeping requirements, including specific information and retention requirements. 25. Severability The agreement's severability provisions should any portion of the agreement be declared invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction or is in contravention of any federal, state or county statute, ordinance, or regulation. 26. Status of Contractor and Subcontractors (if any) Sets forth contractor requirements to be an independent contractor and specifies that contractor assumes exclusive responsibility for acts of its employees, agents and subcontractors as they relate to the services performed under the agreement. -4- 27. Term Specifies when the term of the agreement shall commence and terminate and specific requirements; and any services or duties that shall be performed beyond the term of the agreement, including but not limited to obligations with respect to indemnification, audits, reporting and accounting. 28. Termination Establishes termination written notice requirements, allowable termination events and the termination process. 29. Waiver of Default Specifies what constitutes a waiver of default and waiver of breach. 30. Warranties Details any express or implied warranties by the Contractor which relate to the goods addressed under the agreement. 31. Signature Page A standard signature page format, including notation that the agreement is approved as to form by General Counsel. EXHIBITS AS REQUIRED Exhibits setting forth all necessary specifics, terms and particulars addressing any of the following: 1. Definitions 2. Payments 3. Budgets 4. Services 5. Records and Data Reporting Requirements 6. Reports 7. Maps 8. Other Specific Requirements REF:FIN/MISC/STDC0N.TC1-4 10/3/91 EXAMPLE SUMMARY OF CONTRACT PROVISIONS TERM: Date to Date MAXIMUM OBLIGATION: Dollar Amount NOTICES TO DISTRICTS AND CONTRACTOR: DISTRICTS: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Attention: Position Name CONTRACTOR: Vendor INSURANCE COVERAGES: Coverage Minimum Limits Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability Statutory . Professional Liability Dollar Amount Comprehensive General Liability Insurance Dollar Amount Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance, covering the owned, non -owned and hired Specify automobile hazards, including any ) Districts -loaned vehicles ) PAYMENT TERMS SUMMARY: Include: Compensation Terms Sales Tax Freight Retention (if any) Payment Schedule \V% REN FIN/MISC/CONPROY.EX COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY EQUIPMENT PROGRESS PAYMENT Project: J-19A Central Generation Project Engines Contractor: Cooper-Bessermer/Energy Services Group Address: P.O. Box 730343 Dallas, Texas 75373-034 Date of Contract: 12/31/87 Purchase Order No.: 38044 Progress Payment No: Purchase Order Date: Computed From: Invoices & Contract Maximum Payment Amount: $20,668,245.00 Percent Quantity Description Unit Price Payable Amount Payable 5 LSVB-I6-SGC Engines $2,483,508.40 $ 3 LSVB-12-SGC Engines 2,137,211.00 1 5-Year Maintenance 1,614,750.00 Agreement 1 Misc. Modif., Amend. No. 3 214,320.00 1 Computer Controls, CO No. 1 10,000.00 TOTAL PAYABLE TO DATE $ Deductions: Retained percentage $ Previous payments $ TOTAL DUE AND PAYABLE Date REF:FIN/F0RMS1/EQP.PP1 General Manager COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS November 6, 1991 STAFF REPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1990-92 SERIES C COP ISSUE of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 10844 ELLIS AVENUE PO BOx9127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CAUFORWA 9272E-6127 1714) 962-2411 Staff has prepared and maintains spreadsheets detailing the Districts' Joint Works Construction Draw Schedule and the Districts' Trunk Sewer Construction Draw Schedule. Both spreadsheets identify actual or estimated study, design and construction costs for each capital project by fiscal year. To summarize, the spreadsheets identify the following total Districts' capital improvement costs from fiscal year 1991-92 through fiscal year, 1995-96: Districts' 5-Year Construction Schedule (in millions) Fiscal Year Total Joint Works Total Trunk Sewer Total Outl 1991-92 $ 67.143 $ 28.821 $ 95.964 1992-93 89.653 36.199 125.852 1993-94 83.870 17.424 101.294 1994-95 50.865 19.436 70.301 1995-96 12.680 2.942 15.622 5-Year Total $304.211 $104.822 $409.033 Staff also maintains a Series B proceeds drawdown schedule. The table presents a chronology of interest earnings, draws, invoice payments and balances (all Series A proceeds except the reimbursement amount on deposit with the Orange County Treasurer have been spent). The Districts have been drawing on average between $5 to $7 million each month. Referring to the Fiscal Year 1992-93 draw schedule Total Outlay estimates, the Districts will need to fund up to $126 million in combined joint and trunk sewer projects. The actual COP total projects to be funded will be less than $126 million, however, since Districts 13 and 14 would likely not participate in the Series C issue. Therefore, staff anticipates a Series C COP issue of approximately $100 million during April 1992. FIN/FPC91/5RPG11.7D1 1 . Net Salaries. Wages & Benefits. 2. Odor Control & Chemical Coagulants. 3. Professional & Contract Services. 4. Equipment Charges. 5. Repair & Maintenance Materials & Services. 6. Research & Monitoring. 7. Utilities. 8. Other Materials. Supplies & Outside Services. 9. Total Joint Operating Expenses. 10. Revenues & Offsets. 11 NET✓C0VT OPERA TTNG 12. Ga//ona47,9 Charge jSs/MGf dOYN7-EJSF►ER47� lao t �9/f06ETREirr►EN/� SE1hlSA�4RY G��MPAR/SON OFB TEO df A4,77Z/64/- ai�ENO/TUBES /-75C4L YL4R 7t7Z7ATF T99T-92 rol rRl f(^l ml f Rl rFn UO2% Budget Expenditures Expenditures Increase % Increase o Budget Remaining 1991-92 through through or (Decrease) Expended Budget 9/30/91 9/30/90 Decrease $22.469.000 $5,220.387 $3.964.483 $1 .255.904 31 .68 % 23.23 % $17.248,613 5.120.000 803.797 900.277 (96.480) (10.72)% 15.70 % 4.316.203 8.698.000 1 .681 ,783 1,296,942 384.841 29.67 % 19.34 % 7.016.217 250.000 45.638 62,545 (16.907) (27.03)% 18.26 % 204.362 3.950.000 811.354 774.994 38.360 4.69 % 20.54 % - 3.138.646 3.333.000 507.888 583.879 (75.991) (13.01)% 15.24 % 2.825.1 12 5,805.000 1.515.997 1.318.955 197.042 14.94 % 26.12 % 4.289,003 2.906.000 736.143 536.730 199,413 37.16 % 25.33 0 2.169.857 $52.531 .000 $1 1 .322.987 $9.438,805 $1 .884.182 19.96 % 21 .55 % $41 ,208.013 29500.000 926,153 692.533 233.620 33.73%1 37.05 % (1.573.847) $50.031 ,000 $10,396.834 $8.746.272 $1.650.562 18.87 % 20.78 % 1 $39.634.166 38 II $503.42 $349.46 1 $153.96 II 44.08 % 1 101.01 % I 11/14/91 JOINT OPERATING FUND & WORKING CAPITAL FIND SUMMARY BUDGET REVIEW 3 MONTHS ENDED 9-30-91 DESC ETIDN 1 SALARIES & WAGES 2 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS: 3 RETIREMENT 4 WORKERS COhP 5 UNEMPLOYMENT INS 6 GROUP INSURANCE 7 UNIFORM RENTAL 8 TOTAL BENEFITS 9 SALARIES, WAGES. & BENEFITS 10 W.O. SALARIES & BEN. ALLOC. 11 DIRECT CHARGES.{ORF/DIST 12 COST ALLOC-CORF/DIST 13 W.O. SALARIES & BENEFITS 14 NET J.O. PAYROLL , MATL. SUPPLY. & SERVICES 15 GASOLINE, DIESEL & OIL 16 INSURANCE 17 MEMBERSHIPS 18 OFFICE EXPENSE - SUPPLIES 19 OFFICE EXPENSE - OTHER 20 OPERATING SUPPLIES 21 CHLORINE & ODOR CONTROL 22 SULFIDE CONTROL 23 CHEMICAL COAGULENTS 24 LAB CHEMICALS & SUPPLIES 25 TOOLS 26 SOLV, PAINTS, & JAN. SUPP 27 OTHER OPERATING SUPPLIES 28 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 29 GROUNDSKEEPING 30 OUTSIDE LAB SERVICES 31 SOLIDS REMOVAL 32 OTHER WASTE DISPOSAL 33 OMEN PLANT OPER & MTCE 34 OTHER 35 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ' GENL.SPEC,&LABOR COUNSEL / `IV.0 AUDIT & ACCOUNTING ENGINEERING 39 OTHER A .0 C D E E G tl EXP EXP % EXP INCR INCR BUDGET THRU BUDGET THRU THRU REMAINING (DECR) (DECR) i QCV �l a-ZrLan 1 a01 -.Cn a-ZA..a1 4t(Lal rd rvlwT ! V 21.229,000 4.565.226 23.996,000 5.524.411 23.02 18.471.589 959,185 21.01 3,035.000 604.504 3,513,000 711,141 20.24 2,801,859 106,637 17.64 1551000 35,766 180,000 41.539 23.08 138,461 5,771 16.13 25,000 0 30,000 O 0.00 30,000 0 0.00 1.758,000 336,411 2,460.000 481.016 19.55 1.978.984 144,605 42.99 84,000 20.196 90,000 16,121 17.91 73,879 (4,065) (20.14) 5.057,000 996.869 • 6.273,000 1,249,817 19.92 5,023.183 252.948 25.37 26.2B6,000 5.562,095 30.269,000 6,774,228 22.38 23,494,772 1.212.133 21.79 (4,000.000) (924,526) (4.300,000) (731,033) 17.00 (3,568.967) 193.493 (20.93) (3,000.000) (673:086) (3,500.000) 822,808) 23.51 (2,677,192) (149,722) 22.24 (7,000,000) (1.597,612) (7.800.000) (1.553.841) 19.92 (6,246,159) 43,771 (2.74) 19,266.000 3.9649483 22.469.000 5.220,387 23.23 17.248,613 1.255,904 31.68 250.000 27,320 250.000 44,495 17.80 205.505 17.175 62.87 600.000 151,078 6001000 153.892 25.65 446,106 2,814 1.86 30,000 1.675 30.000 720 2.40 29,280 (955) (57.01) 120,000 26.606 165,000 34,595 20.97 130,405 7.989 30.03 659000 14,190 110,000 19,833 18.03 90,167 5,643 39.77 2,400,000 426.915 2,300,000 375.091 16.31 1,924,909 (51.824) (12.14) 900,000 150.740 890,000 61,023 6.86 828.977 (89.717) (59.52) 2.370.000 3229622 1.930.000 367.683 19.05 1,562,317 45,061 13.97 186.000 31,578 294,000 119,425 40.62 174,575 87.847 278.19 95,000 24.470 115.000 31.477 27.37 83.523 7,007 28.64 150,000 38.264 170,000 44,964 26.45 125,036 6,700 17.51 215,000 31.606 215,000 48.983 22.78 166,027 17,377 54.98 125,000 10.348 100,000 17,729 17.73 82,271 7.381 71.33 404,000 24,922 160.000 12,695 7.93 147,305 (12.227) (49.06) 6.000.000 826.851 5,800,000 1.214,752 20.94 4.585,248 387,901 46.91 190.000 31.928 250,000 17.609 7.04 232,391 (14,319) (44.85) 420,000 7694W 450,000 97,044 21.57 352,956 20.564 26.89 778,000 77,754 750,000 122.322 16.31 627,678 44,568 57.32 650.000 199.919 650,000 112,038 17.24 537,962 (87.881) (43.96) 27,000 10,OD0 53,000 16.000 30.19 37,000 6,000 60.00 75.000 4,827 75,000 '75,562 100.75 (562) 70.735 1,465.4O 525.000 339913 410,000 32,384 7.90 377.616 (1,529) (4.51) 11/14/91 JOINT OPERATING FUND & WORKING CAPITAL FUND SUMMARY BUDGET REVIEW 3 MONTHS ENDED 9-30-91 40 QFSCRIPTION PRINTING & PUBLICATION 41 REPRO -IN-HOUSE 42 PRINTING -OUTSIDE 43 PHOTO PROCESSING 44 NOTICES & ADS 45 RENTS & LASES 46 OUTSIDE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 47 DISTRICT EQUIPMENT RENTAL 48 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 49 MATERIALS 50 CONTRACTS 51 RESEARCH & MONITORING 52 OCEAN SAMPLE/MONITORING 53 OCEAN RESEARCH/I.W./OPER TRAVEL TRAINING & MEETINGS 55 UNCOLLECTABLE ACCOUNTS 56 UTILITIES 57 DIESEL FOR GENERATORS 58 POWER 59 NATURAL GAS 60 TELEPHONE 61 WATER 62 OTHER EXPENSES 63 FREIGHT 64 GENERAL 65 AQMD OPERATING FEES 66 PRIOR YEARS EXPENSE 67 OTHER NON-OPER EXPENSE 68 TOTAL MATLS, SUPP, & SERV 69 COST ALLOC-CORF & OTHER 70 NET J.O.-MATLS, SUPP, & SER 71 TOTAL J. 0. REQUIREMENTS 72 LESS: REVENUE COST ALLOCATION -- CORF, DISTRICTS, & OT NET REVENUE 75 NET J.O. EXPENDITURES A @ C Q E E EXP EXP % EXP BUDGET THRU BUDGET THRU THRU REMAINING 1990-91 9-30-90 1991-92 9-30-91 9-30-91 BUDGET G H INCR INCR (DECK) (DECK) $ Y 140,000 22,529 150,000 36,429 24.29 113,571 13.900 61.70 100,000 13,124 100.000 12,446 12.45 87.554 (678) (5.17) 25.000 6,782 30.000 6,342 21.14 23,658 (440) (6.49) 85.000 23,633 110,000 27,187 24.72 82,813 3.554 15.04 120.000 34.223 120.000 22,737 18.95 97,263 (11.486) Ms.56) 125,000 28.322 130.000 22,901 17.62 107,099 (5,421) (19.14) 3,600.000 751,464 3,700,000 746.588 20.18 2,953,412 (4,676) (0.65) 195,000 23,530 250,000 64,766 25.91 185.234 41.236 175.25 2,104,000 460.937 1,970,000 389.521 19.77 1,580,479 (71.416) (15.49) 590,000 122,942 1,363,000 118,367 8.68 1,244,633 (4,575) (3.72) 175,000 30,976 210,000 50.418 24.01 159,582 19,442 62.76 2,000 0 2,000 0 0.00 2,000 0 0.00 200,000 41,653 200,000 19,428 9.71 180,572 (22,225) (53.36) 5,7009000 1,208,842 5.000.000 1,424,255 28.49 3.575.745 215,413 17.82 175.000 12,110 300.000 9,709 3.24 290,291 (2,401) (19.B3) 120,000 18,800 125,000 33,170 26.54 911830 14,370 76.44 150,000 37,SW 180,000 29.435 16.35 150,565 (8,115) (21.61) 45,000 6,977 45,000 7,086 15.75 37.914 109 1.56 3001000 85,110 3501000 114,001 32.57 235,999 28,891 33.95 300,000 11,581 350,000 41,B64 11.96 308,136 30.283 261.49 50.000 65,000 150,000 O 0.00 1501000 (65,000) (100.00) 45.000 20,946 60,000 9,074 15.12 50,926 (1,872) (17.10) 30,921,000 5.561,037 30,662,000 6.206,040 20.24 24,455,960 645.003 11.60 (600.000) (86,715) (600,000) (103,440) 17.24 (496,560) (16.725) 19.29 30,321,000 5,474,322 30,062,000 6,102,600 20.30 23,959,400 628,278 11.48 49.607.000 9,438,805 52.531,000 11.322.987 21.55 41,208,013 1,884.182 19.96 (2,005,000) (695,754) (2,505,000) (926,441) 36.98 (1,578,559) (230,687) 33.16 51000 3.221 5,000 288 5.76 4,712 (2,933) (91.06) (2.000.000) (692.533) (2.500,000) (926,153) 37.05 (1,573.847) (233.620) 33.73 47,607,000 8.746.272 50.031,000 10,396.634 20.78 39,634,166 1,650,562 18.87 FPC CSDOC JOINT OPERATING WORK ORDER SUMMARY 9 MONTHS ENDED 9/30/91 INCR/(DECR) INCR/(DECR) 9/89 9/90 9/91 FROM PR. YEAR FROM PR. YEAR CALL, DIVER. & INTERPLANT 21,198 41,903 39,558 (2,345) (5.60) HEADWORKS 270.715 441,919 405,316 (36,603) (8.28) PRIMARY TREATMENT 1,375,733 1,546,970 10386,183 (160,787) (10.39) SECONDARY TREATMENT 779,920 702.275 1,104,312 402,037 57.25 SOLIDS HANDLING 1,841.918 1,548,302 1,965,442 417,140 26.94 EFFLUENT DISINFECTION 24,005 58,294 57,736 (558) (0.96) EFFLUENT DISPOSAL 429,310 195,730 418,352 222,622 113.74 SUPERVISORY CONTROL 367.789 398,780 418,554 19,774 4.96 UTILITY SYSTEMS 272,578 359,445 572,423 212,978 59.25 GENERAL PLANT COMPLEX 1,005,129 963,519 1,297,346 333,827 34.65 ODOR CONTROL 1,262,862 1,241,274 1,090,444 (150,830) (12.15) GENERAL ENGINEERING 200,056 134,885 172,867 37,982 28.16 INDUSTRIAL WASTE 101,231 193,733 176,478 (17,255) (6.91) LABORATORIES & RESEARCH 741,418 777,460 1,135,337 357,877 46.03 MOTOR POOL NET CHARGES 55,612 68,679 77,201 8.522 12.41 ELECTRIC CARTS 29,993 36,795 43,317 6,522 17.73 PORTABLE EQUIPMENT 42,121 36,309 35,968 (341) (0.94) TOTAL J. O. EXPENSE $8,821,588 $8,746.272 $10.396,834 $1,650,562 18.87 V WORK ORDER I. New and Rebudgeted Major Projects A. Reclasation Plant t 1. Wastehauler Disp R Sample Sin PI-27-11213 51942-A,B 2. Primary Clarifiers Nos, 6-15, PI-33 $3709-0 3. Can Handling Facilities, P1-34-t 53710-A 4. Sludge Handling Facilitiesr P1-34-2 53710-B 5. Digesters 11-16, P1-34-3 53710-C 6. Rehab of Digesters 9 ■ 10, PI-35-2 52044-A 7. Secondary Trmt Expansion to 80 MCD, P1-36 53717-0 B. Primary Treatment 72 MCD Expansion, PI-37 53119-0 9. Misc. modification, PI-38 52108-A 10. Security 6 Landscaping, PI-38-t It. Earthquake Work, P1-38-2 12. Seismic Upgrading h Struct Work, Pt-38-3 52125-0 13. Fuel System Improvementn, R-033-1 51962-0 14. 40 MCD Oxygen Activated Sludge i DAF's 15. Belt Presses (4 Units) 16, Solids Storage 14 Bins) 17. Digesters: 2 P 110' Diameter 10. Standby Power Generation 19. 12kv Electrical Power Distribution 20. Electrification Project 21. Raw Sewage Emergency Bypass 22, Remove Trickling Filters 14 3 23, Central Air Compressor Station 24. Misc. Projects (See Schedule C) 25. Other Master Plan Projects a. Monitoring 8 Control System, 1992 b. Head -arks No. I Rebuild, ZD03 c. Ileadworks No.2 Impeller/Pump Speed, 2016 d, Remove Trickling Filters 2 6 4, 2007 e, 40 Mgd Oxygen Act'd Sludge ADAF, 2017 f. 110 ft Digesters, 2003 & 2012 g. 4 Belt Presses, 2004 h. 12 KV Power Distribution, 2001-2012 i. Standby Power Generation, 20US A 2015 J. 72 Mgd Primary Treatment, 2004 A 2012 SUB -TOTAL - RECLAMATION PLANT 1 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SCHEDULE B-I SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Page 1 of 4 FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 3 MONTHS ENDED 9130191 i11 121 (3) 141 (51 f61 ESTIMATED PROJECTED TOTAL REQUIRED BUDGET 1991-92 ACCUMULATED COST 0 6/30191 CURRENT YEAR OUTLAY TO 9/30/91 COMPLETED JOBS TRANSrER TO FIXED ASSETS PROJECT COST TO DATE UNEXPENDED BUDGET 1 - 3 2,120,900 50,000 (454) (454) 50,000 42,700,000 4,000.000 40,300,081 2,144,227 42,444.308 1,855,773 14.850.000 4,000,000 11.443.739 1,761,797 13,205,536 2,238,ZD7 22.000,000 1,100.000 115,399 847,747 963,146 252,253 26,50D,000 12,000.000 5,432,701 3,959.084 9.391,785 8,04D,916 3.900,000 2,000,001) 1,224,298 996,482 2,220,780 110031518 39.800,000 3,000,000 2.720,051 179,139 2,899,190 2,820,061 34,100,000 1,000,000 (17,344) 30,366 13.022 969,634 11.020,000 500.000 47,835 64,148 111,983 435,552 1,510.000 500,000 500,000 4,920,000 4D0,0DO 400,000 15,IOD,000 1,000,000 126,654 28,306 155,040 971.614 85,000 25.000 171 103 274 24,897 70,000,000 15.000,000 11,000,000 9,200,000 8,300,000 3,800,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 250,000 50.000 50,0D0 10,250,000 1,000,000 41.798 26.564 68,362 973,436 5,070,000 14,950,000 2,600,000 1,300,000 34,D00,00❑ 18,200,D00 10,920,000 1,099,000 4,914,000 32,500,000 477.958,000 30.625.000 61,434,929 10.038,043 1 71,472,972 1 20,596,957 B, Treatment Plant 2 1. Support Facilities and Site lmprovementB a. Operations Building, P2-23-5-1 b. Warehouse Building. P2-35-2 c. Maintenance Building , P2-35-3 d. Construction Manageoent Office, P2-35-4 e. Phase II Site L Security lop., P2-35-5 2. Mise Mod, L Improv. to Facilities, P2-37 3. Rehab Digester 1, J. K, P2-39-1 4. Rehab Digester L, M, P2-39-2 5. Rehab Digester N, 0, P2-39-3 6. Primary Treatment 24 "GO Expansion, 132-41 7. Secondary Treatment Expansion, P2-42-2 8. Equipment Prepurchase, P2-42-2A 9. Electrification Project, P2-42-1 10. Priority Misc. Hod. L Quake Work, P2-43-1 11. Seismic Upgrading i Struct. Work, P2-43-2 12. Misc. Modifications L Quake Work, P2-43-3 13. Monitor/Control System, P2-44(See J-23-1) 14, ►ue1 System Improvements, R-033-2 15. Standby Power Generation 16. Solids Storage! 2 Rine I7. Additional 105 toot Digester 18. Potable Water Distribution System 19. Plant Water Pump Station 20. Misc. Projects (See Schedule D) 21. Other Master Plan Projects a. Overflow Pump Station, 1990 b. Replace Primary Basins A. B, C, 2006 c. Standby Power Generation, 2005 L 2015 d. Monitoring and Control System, 2005 SUB -TOTAL - TREATMENT PLANT 2 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SCHEDULE B-1 SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Page 2 of 4 FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 3 MONTHS ENDED 9/30/91 11) (2) f3) (4) (5) f6) WORK ORDER ESTIMATED PROJECTED TOTAL REQUIRED BUDGET 1991-92 ACCUMULATED COST v 6130/91 CURRENT YEAR OUTLAY TO 9/30191 COMPLETED JOBS TRANSFER TO FIXED ASSETS PROJECT COST TO DATE UNEXPENDED BUDGET 1 - 3 53715-0 2,750,000 I,500,000 92,902 15,887 108,789 1,494,113 51813-H 4,075,000 500,000 40,887 10.516 51.403 409,484 51813-► 3,575,00D 1,000,000 38,53I 6,167 46,698 991,833 S1813-C 525,000 26.317 2.904 29.221 (2,904) 51813-E 2,305,OOD 100,000 27,176 2.909 30,085 97.091 51979-0 8,158,000 50,000 (57) (57) 50,000 52045-0 5,300,000 4,000,000 419.333 1,106 417,439 3,990,894 5,000,000 1,000,000 t.000,000 5,000,000 53714-0 15,000,000 ISO 2,749 2.959 (2,749) 53718-0 25,200.000 1,000,000 1.186.945 84,249 1.271,193 915,752 53718-B 3.000,000 2,000,000 2,448 1,343 3,791 1,990.657 S3718-A 11,000,000 6,000,000 1,319,667 511,584 1,831,251 5.488,416 52108-0 3,025,000 500.000 41,967 64,159 106,126 435,841 52108-C 15,050,000 1,000,000 2IB,779 50,218 276.997 941.782 3,520,000 1.500,000 1,500,000 52094-0 4,040.000 3.500.000 82,143 4,321 86,464 3,49S,679 51962-H 175,000 50,000 126 3 129 49,997 9,200,000 5,200,000 4.000,000 4.350.000 1.200,000 10.400.000 I,000,000 627,190 91,183 710.373 908,817 250,000 11,700,000 15,120,000 520.000 179.638.000 24,700,000 4,121,464 859,297 4,980.761 23,840,703 C. Reclamation Plant Sites 1, Site Acquisition 2. Reclamation Plant 3 SUB -TOTAL - RECLAMATION PLANTS D. Interpiant and Joint Facilities I. Interplant Facilltes, 1-9 a. 120" Interplant line b. Interplant Utility Chase c. Induntrlml. Water Line d. Digester Gas Line a. Communications Cablo 2. Support Facilities and Site Improvessente a. Admin. Bldg. Expan. L Rehab., J-7-4i5 b. Convert Exst Lab to Office API,J-11-1 c. Central Laboratory, J-17 d. Operstinns/Control Center, J-23-1 e. Computer Equipment, 3-23-2 (see P2-44) f. Personnel Building at Pit I, J-26 g. Demolition of Old Control Center h. Demolition of support Bldg.OP2, 3-27 3. Central Ceneration facility a. Equipment Prepurchase, J-19A b. Emianion Purchase, J-198 c. Plant 1 facility, J-19-1 d. Plant 2 Facility, 3-19-2 Transfer to Project Below Ealasions Control for 13kw Emergency 4. Waste Can Flsres, J-21, J-21A S. Outfall i Booster Pump Stations e. Replace 78" outtaIl Sewer, J-22-((Land) h. Repl. Outfsll No. 1 Land Section,1-22-2 c. New Surge Tower No. 1, J-22-3 d. Temp C12 Station for Outfall No, 1 e. Second Discharge Header GOBS "C" f. Ext. 76" to Deep Water W/120" Outfall S. influent Plowseter a Teat facil.,J-24/A/B 7. Preparation of Utility Atlas, J-25 8. Telephone/Telemetry/Monitoring Expanslan Tranafer to Project Below Pump Sin Telemetry and Monitoring Sys 9. Bushard Interplant Trunk Replacement t0• Electrical Power Systems Rehab. Studies CAPI( rLAY REYOLYtWC FUND SCHEDULE B-1 SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Page 3 of 4 FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 3 MONTHS ENDED 9/30/91 fli f21 (31 (4) (5) f61 WORK ESTIMATED REQUIRED ACCUMULATED CURRENT YEAR COMPLETED JOBS PROJECT UNEXPENDED ORDER PROJECTED BUDCET COST OUTLAY I TRANSFER TO COST BUDGET TOTAL 1991-92 0 6/30191 TO 9130/91 FIXED ASSETS TO DATE 1 - 3 5,000,000 5.000,000 S,DDO.00D 52133-A 61,000.000 100,000 198.991 16,070 215,061 83.930 66,000,000 5,100,000 198,991 I6,070 215,061 5.083,930 53713-0 41.415 41,415 (41,415) 20,600,000 - 14,000,000 860.124 860,124 14,000,000 820.000 500,ODO 500,CDO 1,020.000 500,000 500,000 130,0DO 100,000 100,000 51937-0,B 7,500,000 400.000 2.487,747 464,854 2.952,601 (64.8541 52D83-0 2.062.000 50.000 27,193 2,904 30,067 41,096 53706-0 9,000.000 3.200.000 6.362.757 1.534,345 7,896,602 2,665.655 53712-A 3,67S,ODO 3,130,000 1,101,673 1,101,673 2,028,327 53712-B 1.300,000 300.000 872,443 23,638 896,081 276,362 53716-0 1.110,000 200,000 30.870 2,904 33,774 197,096 450,000 52084-0 80,000 26.365 2,904 29,269 12,9041 53707-C 24,851,000 2.000,000 20,350,863 20,3SO,863 2.000.000 53707-A,B 3,124,000 3.050.080 3,050,080 53101-A 15,800,000 10,400,000 3,517,706 2,638,310 6,156,016 7,761,590 53707-B 23,3SO.000 7,000.000 18,886.561 1.652,020 20,539,481 5,347,090 52I30-0 1,04D,000 5,180 9.421 14,6D1 (9,421) 52040-0 648,000 350,000 463.253 257,735 72o,988 92.265 53711-0 3.112.000 1,000,000 2,120.229 (151,8791 1.968.349 1,151.879 2.000,000 500,000 27.323 27.323 472,677 3,300.000 2.600.000 4,400.000 50,000.000 52065-0 700,000 50,000 611.117 3,172 614,289 46.820 58216-0 3,300,000 500,000 22,425 7,402 29,827 492,598 800.000 200,000 200.0110 52146-0 415,000 2.082 2.082 (2,OA2) 33,000.000 2.000,000 WORK ORDER 11. Sludge Disposal Projects a. Compost Demonstration Plant b, Land Acquisition c. Landfill Development Phase 1 58207-A d. Compost Fatllity I2. District Information Management Network a. Maintenance R Oper KBmnt Computer System b. Lab Information Management System 52149-9 c. Purchasing/Inventory Control System d. Accounting/Financial Information System a. Existing LAN System Upgrades f. Network Linkage facilities 13. Emissions Controle.13 H11 Tmerg Generators 14. Mine Projects (gee Schedule E) 15. Other Master Plan Projects a. Replace 78" Qutfall with t20" 2009 b. Expand ODDS "r." to North 2019 c. Sludge Dlsp. Landfill Phase IS 2911 d. Sludge Dlsp. Equip Phase I a 11 2001 SUB -TOTAL - INTERPLANT i JOINT SUB -TOTAL - MAJOR PROJECTS 2. Special Projects, Studies 4 Research A. Action Plan: I. NPDLS Permit Application 58209-7 2. Implementation - TQM S. Solids Treatment, Disposal and Reuse Transfer to Project Below Sludge Disposal Related Projects 58214-0 C. Deep Ocean Disposal Evaluation 51759-0 D. Air Quality Control Program I. Air Toxic9 Inventory (AB2588 w/ PEEP) 58218-0 Transfer to Project Below Air Toxics Emissions Inventory Report (AEIR) and Health Risk Assessment (119A) 58218-A 2. VOC/ROG BACT Demonstration Program E. Water Conservation and Reclamation R&D Projects Transfer to Project Below Santa Ana River Interceptor UtJIIZStlo 58221-0 SUB -TOTAL - SPECIAL PROJECTS 3. Equipment Items SUB -TOTAL - JOINT WORKS CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS COMPLETED AT G/30/91 SCHEDULE F TOTAL JOINT WORKS CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS CA'LAY REVOLVING FUND SCHEDULE B-I P SUMMARY Of JOf, .cRS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Page 4 of 4 FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 3 MONTHS ENDED 9/30/91 (11 (21 (3) (41 951 161 ESTIMATED REQUIRED ACCUMULATED CURRENT YEAR COMPLETED JOBS PROJECT UNEXPENDED PROJECTED BUDGET COST OUTLAY TRANSFER TO COST BUDGET TOTAL 1991-92 9 6/30/9t TO 9130/91 FIXED ASSETS TO DATE l - 3 9,000,ODO 24,000,000 28.600.000 15,611 t5,611 50,360,000 900,000 900.000 900,000 750,000 750,000 680 525.199 525.879 224,801 421,000 421,ODO 421,D00 500,00D 500,000 500,000 2D0,000 200.000 200,000 150,000 ISD,000 150,000 1.200,000 700.000 700,000 10,200.000 1,000,000 75,559 60,341 133,900 939.559 2D,280,000 27,125,000 15,600,000 11.550.000 429,623.000 49.001,000 59 784,232 8,206,663 67990,895 40,794.337 1.153,219,000 109,426,000 125,539,616 19,120.073 144.659.689 90.305,927 265.000 45,000 244.948 15,720 260.665 29,280 500,000 2DO,000 20D,000 1.130,000 I00,000 100.000 (8,596) (01598) 8,596 241.527 8.596 250.123 1,529.000 50.000 578,529 578.529 50.000 3,500,000 1,242,000 200,000 740,282 740,282 200,000 (9s,6251 (98,625) 423.142 98,625 33,345 98,625 131.970 550.000 200,000 200,000 3,150,000 400,000 400.000 (34,542) (34.542) 36,000 34,542 1,458 1 $77 1 2,035 33,965 12.325,142 1.195.000 1.840.069 123,518 1 1.963,607 1,071,482 44,Bt9,000 3,744,000 1,098,129 358,037 (773,448) 682.718 3,38S,963 1,210.363,I42 114.365.000 12B,477,834 19,601,628 (773,4481 147,306,014 94,763,372 $61,786 3Z,473 594,259 (32,473) 129,039,620 19,634.101 (773,448) 147.900,273 94,730,899 1,210,363,142 114.365,000 -.NOW QUARTERLY WORKERS' COMPENSATION SELF -INSURED FUND BUDGET REVIEW 3 MONTHS ENDED 9-30-91 A B C D E F S EXPENDITURES X EXPENDED REMAINING EXPENDITURES TO DATE 1991-92 THROUGH THROUGH 1991-92 THROUGH INCREASE FROM EXPENDITURES BUDGET 9-330-71 9-30-91 BUD6ET 9-30-90 (➢ECREASEI 7-1-79 i Salaries 10,000 68B 6.88 9,312 1,460 i772) 154,554 2 Claims 145,000 80,525 55.53 64,475 37,947 42,578 1,500,908 3 Contractual Services 22,000 10,785 49,02 11,215 8,049 2,736 129,248 4 Legal Services 3,000 0 0.00 3,000 0 0 0 5 Professional Services 28,000 8,592 30.69 19,408 7,536 1,056 188,156 6 Supplies & Other 12,000 594 4.95 11,406 2,034 (1,440) 18,838 7 Sub Total -------- 220,000 --------- 1017184 -------- 45.99 -------- 118,816 -------- 57,026 ---------- 44,158 ---------- 1,991,784 8 Excess Loss Policy 37,000 43,775 118.31 (6,775) 0 43,775 316,929 a Total Expenditures 257,000 -------- 144,957 --------- 56.40 -------- 112,041 -------- 57,026 -------- 97,933 --------- 2,3081713 ---------- REVENUES 6 RESERVES 10 In -Lieu Premiums 180,000 41,538 23.09 138,462 35,769 3,769 1,650,549 11 Interest a Other 77,000 14,400 18.70 62,600 15,785 (1,385) 791,156 12 Total Revenues -------- 257,000 --------- 55,936 -------- 21.77 -------- 201,062 -------- 51,554 --------- 4,384 ---------- 2,441,705 13 Excess Revenue (Expense) -------- 0 --------- (89,021) -------- -------- 89,D21 -------- -------- 15,472) --------- (83,5471 --------- ---------- 132,992 14 Beginning Reserves 637,000 472,013 423,328 0 15 Transfers 0 0 0 250,000 16 Ending Reserves -------- 637,000 -------- --------- 382,992 --------- -------- 417,856 -------- ---------- 3821992 ---------- WCQB991.XL5 2:51 PM 1111319i QUARTERLY EXPENDITURES 1 Claims - Medical 2 - Disability* 4 - Dental 5 - Sub -Total 6 Contractual Services 7 Stop Loss insurance SELF -FUNDED HEALTH PLAN BUDGET REVIEW 3 MONTHS ENDED 9-30-91 A B C D E F 6 EXPENDITURES : EXPENDED REMAINING EXPENDITURES TO DATE 1991-92 THROUGH THROUGH 1991-92 THROUGH INCREASE FROM BUDGET ----------- 9-30-91 ------------ 9-30-71 -------------------- BUDGET 9-30-90 ----------- (DECREASE) ----------- 7-1-79 ----------- 1,784,000 298,384 16.73 114851616 2DII624 161760 7,522,677 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 173,457 247,000 641766 26.22 192,234 63,393 L,373 1,177,688 2,031,000 ---- 363,150 --- 17.88 1,667,950 3451017 --- 1B,133 8,873,822 45,000 17,034 37.85 27,966 19,678 (2,644) 339,566 101,000 --------- 341658 ---------- 34.31 --------- 66,342 -------- 34,961 --------- (303) --------- 623,299 --------- 8 Total Expenditures 2,177,000 -------------------- 414,842 19.06 --------- 1,762,158 -------- 399,656 --------- 15,186 --------- 9,836,687 --------- REVENUES k RESERVES 9 In -Lieu Premiums From - C5DOC 779,000 155,137 19.71 623,863 1841939 (29,8021 51617,190 10 - Employee 201,000 61,371 30.53 139,627 50,724 10,647 995,524 11 - Sub-Tota -------------------- 980,000 -------------------- 216,508 -------- 22.09 -------- -------- 763,472 -------- --------- 235,663 --------- �- -------- (19,155) --------- --------- 6,612,714 --------- 12 Reimb from Stop Loss Insurance 0 2141770 (214,778) 1,258 2137520 546,945 13 Other 0 ---------- ---------- 1,820 -------- (1,828) -------- 1,044 --------- (16) --------- 145,404 --------- 14 Total Revenues 900,000 433,114 44.20 546,886 238,765 194,349 7,305,063 15 Excess Revenue (Expense) -------------------- (1,197,000) 19,272 -------- -------- (1,215,272) --------- (160,891) --------- 179,163 --------- (2,531,624) 16 Cash and Carry -aver Reserves 110,000 145,677 142,524 17 Transfers 1,197,000 51,681 350,000 2,747,254 1B Ending Reserves 110,000 -- 215,630 -- 331,633 2151630 *Disability insurance has been purchased rather than self -funded since December 1989 SFPB991.XLS 10:55 AM 11/14/91 QUARTERLY PUBLIC LIABILITY SELF -INSURED FUND BUDGET REVIEW ---� 9 MONTHS ENDED 9-30-91 A B C D E F G EXPENDITURES Z EXPENDED REMAINING EXPEN➢ITURES TO DATE 1991-92 THROUGH THROUGH 1991-72 THROUGH INCREASE FROM EXPENDITURES BUDGET ---------- 9-30-91 ------------ 9-30-91 ------- BUDGET --------- 9-30-90 ----------- (DECREASE) ------------ 7-1-79 --------- I Salaries 1,000 0 0.00 11000 0 0 1,715 2 Claims 20,000 70 0.35 19,930 0 70 309,471 3 Contractual Services 7,000 2,800 40.00 4,200 1,101 1,699 66,807 4 Legal Services 40,000 48,634 121.59 (8,634) 2,735 45,899 321,604 5 Professional Services 1000 0 0.00 1,000 0 0 260 6 Supplies 5 Other 2,000 0 0.00 2,000 0 0 0 7 Sub Total ---------- 71,000 ------------ 51,504 ---------- 72.54 --------- 19,496 ---------- 3,836 ----------- 47,668 --------- 699,937 8 Excess Loss Policyt 265,000 0 0.00 265,000 0 0 405,217 9 Total Expenditures 336,000 ---------- 51,504 ------------ 15.33 ---------- 2841496 --------- 31836 ---------- 47,668 ----------- 1,105,154 --------- REVENUES 6 RESERVES 10 In -Lieu Premiums 258,000 64,500 25.00 193,500 64,500 0 1,99B4O09 I Interest k Other 190,000 47,779 25.15 142,221 41,781 5,998 1,103,476 12 Allocation to Other Funds 0 0 0 0 0 123,929 13 Reimbursement from Stop Loss 0 D 0 0 12,804 14 Total Revenues ---------- 448,000 ------------ 112,279 -------------- 25.06 --------- 3351721 ---------- 106,2B1 ----------- 5,998 ---------- 3,238,218 15 Excess Revenue (Expense) ---------- 112,000 ------------ 60,775 -------------- --------- 51,225 ---------- 102,445 ----------- (41,670) --------- 2,133,064 16 Beginning Reserves 212941000 2,322,289 1,980,679 17 Transfers 0 0 250,000 18 Ending Reserves 2,406,000 2,383,064 2,0B3,124 2,383,064 ----------------------------------------- }Districts Entirely Self -Insured for Liability Claims Since July I986 PLOB991.XL5 1:51 PM 1 1 /14/91 PROPERTY TAX AND USER FEE REVIEW 1991-92 Annual County's Year -to -Date Budget Allocation Receipts Property Taxes: 1 1,700,000 1,674,992 134,326 2 8,520,000 8,365,778 670,360 3 10,900,000 10,738,975 859,242 5 2,580,000 2,566,301 205,371 6 1,390,000 1,348, 906 107,892 7 4,058,000 3,917,242 314,652 11 2,425,000 2,434,579 194,382 13 0 0 0 31,573,000 31,046,773 2,486,225 User Fees: 1 5,655,000 5,540,866 0 2 14,825,000 15,826,994 0 3 16,728,000 16,848,001 0 5 2,153,000 1,990,360 0 6 2,984,000 2,784,446 0 7 3,800,000 3,969,111 0 11 3,078,000 3,054,878 0 13 670,000 674,020 0 49,893,000 50,688,676 50,688,676 TAX FEEI.XLS 11:38 AM Cr' STEVEN E. L. WIS 'SJTY (D Fc AUDITOR -CONTROLLER FINANCE BUILDING 630 NORTH BROADWAY P. O. BOX 557 RAN E SANTA ANA, CA, 92702.0567 TELEPHONE: 834-2450 AREA CODE 714 OFFICE OF AUDITOR ,CONTROLLER July 18, 1991 TO: All Taxing Agencies in Orange County ATTENTION: Finance Directors SUBJECT: Property Tax Apportionments, Fiscal Year 1991-92 We are pleased to again advise you of our plan for distribution of tax collections to your agency for the current fiscal year. This proposed distribution plan is based on anticipated tax collections. Any substantial deviation from past collection experience would necessarily, require us to adjust our apportionments accordingly. Tax apportionments will be made as scheduled below: ortionment Apportionment Percent of Levy or Actual Number Date Amount to be Apportioned Secured: 1 November 27, 1991 5% 2 December 16, 1991 20% 3 December 23, 1991 20% 4 January 27, 1992 Remainder of First Installment 5 March 25, 1992 5% 6 April 20, 1992 30% 7 May 22, 1992 Remainder of Second Installment 8 July 10, 1992 Collections through May 31, 1992 9 Final July 20, 1992 Collections through June 30, 1992 Unsecured: 1 September 25, 1991 2 January 24, 1992 3 Final June 181 1992 Actual Collections through August 31, 1991 Actual Collections through December 31, 1991 Actual Collections through May 31, 1992 State -Assessed Public Utility -Unitary and Operating Non -Unitary: 1 February 7, 1992 1st Installment Collections 2 May 25, 1992 2nd Installment Collections n) 1`0132-26 All Taxing Agencies in Orange County July 18, 1991 Page 2 Supplemental: 1 August 28, 1991 2 September 25, 1991 3 October 15, 1991 4 November 15, 1991 5 December 16, 1991 6 January 15, 1992 7 February 14, 1992 8 March 16, 1992 9 April 15, 1992 10 May 15, 1992 11 June 15, 1992 12 July 21, 1992 Delinquent Supplemental July, 1992 Special District Augmentation Tax Fund: 1 October 10, 1991 2 December 10, 1991 3 December 27, 1991 4 April 29, 1992 5 June 10, 1992 6 June 30, 1992 Prior Year Secured April 15, 1992) Prior Year Secured ) Penalties* April 17, 1992) Prior Year Unsecured June 19, 1992 Prior Year Secured July 23, 1992) Prior Year Secured ) Penalties* July 24, 1992) Trailer Coach Fees October, 1991 November, 1991 April, 1992 May, 1992 Homeowners Property December 10, 1991 Tax Relief January 10, 1992 May 8, 1992 June 10, 1992 Actual Collections through July 31, 1991 5% Advance of Levy 5% Advance of Levy 5% Advance of Levy 5% Advance of Levy 5% Advance of Levy Actual Collections less Advances 5% Advance of Levy 5% Advance of Levy 5% Advance of Levy Actual Collections less Advances Actual Collections through June 30, 1992 Collections July 1, 1991 through June 30, 1992 5% 5% 35% 30% 25% Balance in Fund Collections July 1, 1991 through March 31, 1992 Collections June 1, 1991 through May'31, 1992 Collections April 1, 1992 through June 30, 1992 *Same collection periods as Prior Year Secured 15% 35% 35% 15% 111..L 1Q1L.LIly AyCl1L.1C� 111 Vtp,�yyC 4uuyy4Y July 18, 1992 Page 3 The amount of each percentage apportionment may be computed by applying the percentage shown to the actual levies for your various funds as shown on he computer listings identified as Secured Tax Charge and Homeowners Tax —�'harge, which will be sent to you as soon as they are available during the 3rd and 4th week of September. Collection charges, if appropriate, will be deducted from the following apportionment: Secured Numbers 4, 7, 8, and 9 Unsecured Numbers 1, 2, and 3 Prior Year Secured Prior Year Secured Penalties Prior Year Unsecured Public Utility -Unitary and Operating Non -Unitary On the apportionment dates in the above schedule, checks will be mailed to those agencies who use a depository other than the County Treasury, while a journal voucher transfer will be made by this office crediting the funds of those agencies using the County Treasury as their depository. Interest earned on property tax collections prior to apportionment is allocated to all taxing agencies and distributed at the end of the fiscal year by the County Treasurer -Tax Collector. Please contact Neal Gruber of our Tax Unit at 834-4437 if you have any questions regarding this schedule. , hope this schedule will assist .you in planning your fiscal program for .e year. Steven E. Lewis Auditor -Controller NG:hs cc: Lois Denton, A/C Chuck Krueger, A/C Jim McConnell, A/C Earl Paull, A/C Neal Gruber, A/C Kathy Ferrola, A/C Susan Wadell, A/C Joyce Allison, A/C Don Datko, Dept. of Education Ray Wells, Treasurer/Tax Collector Gary Cowan, Treasurer/Tax Collector Darlene Kataoka, Treaasurer/Tax Collector Matt Raabe, Treasurer/Tax Collector --z-cApport/rst2 RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 12 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA \%W/ December 11, 1991 Joint Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 of Orange County, California 10844 ELLIS AVENUE P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 17141952-2411 Subject: Summary Financial Report for Three Months Ended September 30, 1991 Transmitted herewith is the Summary Financial Report for three months ended September 30, 1991. The statements summarize the fiscal activities of the joint operations and the individual Districts through the first quarter of the 1991-92 fiscal year and the status of each with respect to the approved budgets. The combined 1991-92 budget for all Districts is $592.4 million, of which approximately 62% is for capital expenditures for facilities improvements and additions, including reserves for said capital projects and borrowing. The total budgeted revenue and expense categories of the several Districts are set forth below. TABLE I COMPARATIVE BUDGET SUMMARY (MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) REQUIREMENTS 1990-91* 1991-92* JOINT TREATMENT WORKS 0, M & R $ 47.6 $ 50.0 COLLECTION SYSTEM & OTHER DISTRICT 0. M & R 10.8 11.4 TREATMENT PLANT CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATIONS 103.4 114.1 DISTRICT SEWER CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATIONS 37.3 30.1 DEBT ISSUE & SERVICE (G.O. & C.O.P.) 50.8 35.5 SUB -TOTAL $249.9 $241.1 CONSTRUCTION RESERVES $224.4 $224.8 OTHER RESERVES 100.7 126.5 SUB -TOTAL $325.1 $351.3 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS $575.0 $592.4 FUNDING CARRY-OVER $ 71.3 $ 90.2 APPROPRIATED RESERVES 101.3 254.5 SUB -TOTAL 172.6 $344.7 TAX ALLOCATION (1% SHARE) $ 32.8 $ 35.1 TAX LEVY FOR BOND REDEMPTION --- --- CONSTRUCTION GRANTS 1.0 1.0 FEES 71.4 81.3 BORROWING 265.0 91.1 INTEREST & OTHER 32.2 39.2 SUB -TOTAL $402.4 $247.7 TOTAL FUNDING $575.0 $592.4 * ADJUSTED FOR INTER -DISTRICT TRANSACTIONS INCREASE (DECREASE) 1991-92 % OF BUDGET 8.4% $ 2.4 .6 1.9 10.7 19.3 (7.2) 5.1 15.3 6.0 $ 8.8 40.7% $ .4 37.9% 25.8 21.4 $ 26.2 59.3% $ 17.4 100.0% $ 18.9 15.2% 153.2 42.9 $ 172.1 58.1% $ 2.3 5.9% --- .2 9.9 13.7 (173.9) 15.5 7.0 6.6 $(154,71 41.9% $ 17.4 100.0% Summary Financial Report December 11, 1991 Included in each District's statement is a summary of the above major income and expense categories and an itemization of their trunk sewer construction projects and respective share of the joint works expansion. Authorized general reserves and inter -fund transfers have been excluded from the budget column on said statements as expenditures are not charged directly against such appropriations. Summarized below are comments relativ statements are presented on an accrual transactions for fiscal 1991-92 which in the year-to-date balances. CASH AND INVESTMENTS e to the financial statements. The basis and, therefore, inter -district cash were accrued in 1990-91 are not reflected Earned interest generated by our continuing program of investing reserve funds (primarily capital funds accumulated for construction of required sewerage facilities) is $6.1 million through the first quarter of the year. Virtually 100% of our funds are invested in "short-term government securities or time deposits. As of September 30, 1991, 71% of our funds were invested with the County Treasurer's commingled investment program. The remaining 29% of funds, representing the debt service reserves for the 1986 and 1990-92 Series B COP issues and the unspent proceeds of the 1990-92 Series B issue, is held and invested by the trustees for each issue. JOINT OPERATING FUND This fund accounts for operations, maintenance, and administrative activities relative to the Districts' jointly -owned treatment and disposal facilities. The JO expenditures along with the self -funded insurance program costs are monitored by the Fiscal Policy Committee and if some unexpected expenditures are experienced they are reviewed by the Committee. Salaries and Wages - Even though we have had to add employees, there are several authorized but unfilled positions and, thus, some payroll savings have been realized to date. Employees' Benefits - Includes Retirement, Workers' Compensation, Unemployment Insurance, Group Medical Insurance and Uniforms. Chargebacks to Districts and CORF - Payroll expenses are charged back to CORF through the cost accounting system for work on the treatment plants' capital expansion program, and to individual Districts for work on Districts' collection facilities capital expansion projects as well as maintenance and repair of said systems. Source control division charges to respective Districts are also included in these chargebacks. Gasoline, Oil & Fuel - Includes all fuel for motor pool. A large portion is recovered through our equipment billing system and included in revenue below. -2- Summary Financial Report December 11, 1991 Insurance - Budget amount includes Board and staff out -of -county travel policy, employee fidelity, boiler, fire, earthquake and all risk insurance policies, and pro-rata cost of the self -funded liability insurance program. Expense is in line with annual budget. Memberships - Includes the cost of membership in CASA, AMSA, SARFPA, Water Reuse and other organizations. Annual membership costs are recorded when paid. Office Expense - This account includes various types of office supplies, postage, stationery and related items. Chlorine and Odor Control Chemicals - Primarily for influent and sludge odor control at treatment plant sites. The main chemicals used to control odors are chlorine, ferrous chloride and hydrogen peroxide. Ferric chloride is used as a supplemental odor control chemical, and caustic soda is also used in air scrubbers throughout the plants to reduce hydrogen sulfide emissions. New air scrubbers are proving to be less costly to operate than anticipated. Chemical Coagulants - Expenditures for this item are required to dewater our sludges prior to disposal to comply with Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements. Other Operating_ Supplies - Miscellaneous items such as solvents, cleaners, janitorial, tools, lab chemicals, etc. purchased throughout the year. Contractual Services - The major elements in this line item are payment for grit �•.•� removal and disposal at the BKK landfill and payment for removal off -site and reuse of sludge. Professional Services - Primarily consists of General Counsel's fees, other legal services, audit fees, and miscellaneous consulting services. Printing and Publications - Includes all reproduction activities in-house and with outside services. Rents and Leases - Eguipment Outside Eguipment Rental - Primarily for the rental -of large cranes and equipment necessary for removing and replacing major pumps, engines and other large equipment during the course of maintenance and repair operations. CSDOC Equipment Rental - Reflects the charges for District -owned equipment used for overhead type activities. There is an offsetting credit applied through the cost allocation system for these charges. -3- \%Ov/ Summary Financial Report December 11, 1991 Repairs and Maintenance - This item includes parts and supplies for repair of plant facilities. Escalating costs continue to have a significant impact on this item. Generally this account runs close to budget each year due to the unpredictability of major equipment failures. Research and Monitoring - Budget includes funds for the ocean monitoring contract required by our NPDES permit. Other projects include operational research and evaluation of processes to develop optimum operating parameters, and also include the Districts' annual share of participation in the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. Travel. Meetings & Training - Major items are authorized by specific Board actions. Expanding activities of regulatory agencies have required additional staff and Board travel. Utilities - The major item in the Utilities Expense Account is for purchased electrical power. Future expenses are expected to remain within the budget limits. Other Expenses - For items not chargeable elsewhere such as freight, safety supplies, etc. Prior Year's Expense - This account is required by the Uniform Accounting System and represents adjustments to an operating or non -operating account balance from the previous year or payment of charges which could not be accrued at year end. Generally, all expenses to this account are recorded in the first quarter. Allocation to Districts and CORF - This is an account established in connection with the cost accounting system and represents materials, supplies, and services overhead chargebacks to the individual Districts and CORF. CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND This fund accounts for the costs of expanding and improving the Districts' jointly -owned treatment and disposal facilities and represents an average of 47% (excluding reserves) of each District's budget requirements for 1991-92. During the first three months, $19.6 million was expended on joint works -treatment and disposal facilities improvement and expansion projects. The pro-rata share of joint works improvement and expansion costs is reflected in the financial statements of the respective Districts. INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS - The statements reflect the accounting transactions for the nine Districts and include each respective District's share of the Joint Operating Fund and the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund. -4- Summary Financial Report December 11, 1991 \.MO./ Taxes: Tax revenue is allocated to two separate accounts: Tax Allocation - This account represents the anticipated allocation of the Districts' pro rata share of the maximum 1% basic property tax allowed under Proposition 13. The Districts average approximately 2.9% ($.029 for each $1.00) of the basic levy. Tax Levy - This account represents tax funds necessary to make voter -approved outstanding general obligation bond principal and interest payments. In accordance with the Jarvis -Gann initiative, tax levies to satisfy these obligations are not restricted. The 1991-92 levy was waived for District 7, and debt service is being financed by interest on reserve funds. Only District 11 has a 1991-92 tax levy for bond service. Federal and State Construction Grants - EPA and SWRCB have historically funded up to 87h% of treatment plant construction for approved projects. The budgeted amount is the outstanding balance on projects pending final EPA and SWRCB review. Fees - All Districts now have an adopted, uniform sewer connection fee schedule. This account also reflects industrial waste user charges levied by seven of the nine Districts pursuant to the Uniform Industrial Waste Ordinance and the Revenue Program, and the user fees implemented in Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 11 and 13. Annexation fee revenue is unpredictable and, thus, is not included in the budgets unless there is an existing agreement providing for payment of fees. Sale of Capacity Rights - This account records income from sale of capacity rights to outside agencies such as SAWPA, including the capital replacement charge. Joint Works Equity Sale - Revenue from the annual joint facilities interdistrict equity adjustment required ty the recalculation'of the respective ownership percentages: Cost of this adjustment for purchasing Districts is included in each District's Share of Joint Works Construction. Share of Joint Works Construction - Represents each District's share of joint treatment and disposal facilities expansion discussed above under Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF). Bond Retirement and Interest Expense - Payment of principal and interest on outstanding general obligation bonds and certificates of participation of the respective Districts. Annual budgeted expense for all Districts is approximately $35.5 million. -5- Summary Financial Report December 11, 1991 Share of Joint Operating - Represents each District's share of operating and maintaining the jointly -owned treatment and disposal facilities, and administrative activities. Costs are distributed based upon each District's respective gallonage flow (see Joint Operating Fund statement for details). District Operating and Other Expenditures - Consists primarily of individual Districts' general operating expenses, industrial monitoring, operations, maintenance and repair of the respective Districts' collection systems. -6- QTR.RPTS91/QTSU12.11-16 W" Wn `14 COUNTY SANITATION DI57RICTS Of ORANGE COUNTY SUMMARY JOINT OPERA7ING/WORKING CAPITAL FUND BUDGET REVIEW 3 MONTHS ENDED 9/30/91 APPROVED BUDGET YEAR-70-DATE UNEXPENDED YEAR-TO-DATE 1991-92 EXPENDITURES BUDGET %EIPENDED SALARIES, WAGES & BENEFITS .......................... Salaries 6 Wages 23,996,000 $1524,411 16,471,589 23.02% Payroll Benefits 6,273,000 1,249,817 ------------ 5,023,183 ------------ 19.92% ............ 70TAL PAYROLL ............ 3D,269,000 6,774,228 23,494,772 22.38% Less: Chargeouts to DISTS & CORP (7,800,000) (1,553,8411 (6,246,1591 ------------ 19.92% ------------ HIT JOINT OPERATING PAYROLL ------------ 22,469,000 ............ ------------ 5,220,387 ------------ 17,246,613 ------------ 23.23% ............ MATERIALS, SUPPLIES & SERVICES .............................. Gasoline, Oil & Diesel 250,000 44,495 205,505 17.80% Insurance 600,000 153,892 446,108 25.65% Metberships 30,000 720 29,280 2.40% office Expense 275,000 54,428 220,572 19.79% Chlorine & Odor Control 3,190,000 436,114 2,753,886 13.67% Chetical Coagulants 1,930,ODO 367,683 1,562,317 19.05% Other Operating Supplies 794,000 244,849 549,151 30.84% Contractual Services 7,510,000 1,482,151 6,027,849 19.74% Professional Services 1,188,000 235,984 952,016 19.86% Printing & Publication 390,000 82,404 307,596 21.13% Equlptent Rental 250,006 45,638 204,362 18.261 Repairs & Maintenance 3,950,000 811,354 3,138,616 20.541 Research & Monitoring 3,333,000 507,888 2,825,112 15.24% Travel, Meeting 6 7raioing 230,00D 50,418 159,582 24.01% Uncollectable Accounts 2,000 0 2,000 0.00% Utilities 5,805,000 1,515,997 4,2B9,003 26.121 Other Expenses 745,000 162,951 562,049 21.87% Prior Years Expenses 150,DDO 0 15D,000 0.001 Non Operating Expenses 60,000 9,074 50,926 15.12% TOTAL MATERIALS & SERVICES 30,662,000 6,206,040 24,455,960 20.24% Less: ALLOCATION 7O DISTS & CORY (600,000) 1103,1401 (496,560) 17.24% NET JOINT OPER MATERIALS & SERVICES 30,D62,000 6,102,600 23,959,400 ------------ 20.3D1 ............ TOTAL JOINT OPERATING EIPENSES ------------ 52,531,00D ............ ------------ 11,322,987 ------------ 41,208,013 ------------ 21.55% ............ REVENUES Revenues (21505,0001 (926,441) 11,578,559) 36.981 Less: Allocation to DISTS & CORP 5,000 288 4,712 5.76% ------------ ME7 JOINT OPERATING REVENUES ------------ 12,50D,0D0) ------------ 1926,153) ------------ (1,573,817) 37.05% ME7 JOI97 OPERATING EXPENSES ......------ 50,031,000 ------------ 10,396,834 ............ 39,631,166 ------------ 20.78% GALLONAGE DATA N.G. FLOW CHARGES ------------------------------------- DISTRICT BUDGET TO DATE .............................................. BUDGET TO DATE ........ ------------ 1 10,135 ------------ 2,176 ............ 5,051,00D ------------ 1,095,11D 2 31,212 6,902 15,555,000 3,471,387 3 31,801 61509 15,851,000 3,276,775 5 4,115 828 2,450,000 416,770 6 5,173 1,104 2,728,000 555,572 7 7,706 1,300 3,640,000 654,595 11 6,301 1,240 3,110,000 624,510 13 640 177 319,000 89,010 14 2,201 ------------ 417 ------------ 1,097,000 ------------ 209,905 100,387 20,653 50,031,000 ............ 10,396,834 1. New and Rebudgeted Major Projects A. Reclamation Plant 1 1. Wastehauler Disp 4 Sample Stn P1-27-1/2/3 2. Primary Clarifiers Noe. 6-15. P1-33 3. Gas Handling facilities, P1-34-1 4. Sludge Handling Facilities; P1-34-2 S. Digesters 11-16, P1-34-3 6. Rehab of Digesters 9 i 10. P1-35-2 7. Secondary Trot Expansion to 80 MCD, PI-36 S. Primary Treatment 72 MCD Expansion, PI-37 9. Misc. Modification, PI-38 10. Security 6 Landscaping, PI-38-1 11. Earthquake Rork, P1-38-2 12. Seismic Upgrading A Struct Work, PI-38-3 13. Fuel System Improvements, R-033-1 14. 40 MCD Oxygen Activated Sludge & DAF's 15. Belt Presses (4 Unite) 16. Solids Storage (4 Bins) 17. Digesters: 2 ! 110' Diameter 10. Standby Power Generation 19. 12kv Electrical Power Distribution 20. Electrification Project 21. Raw Sewage Emergency Bypass 22. Remove Trickling filters 1 t 3 23. Central Air Compressor Station 24. Misc. Projects (See Schedule C) 25. Other Master Plan Projects a. Monitoring i Control System, 1992 b. Headworks No. I Rebuild, 2003 c. Headworks No.2 Impeller/Pump Speed, 2016 d. Remove Trickling filters 2 A 4, 2007 e. 40 Mgd Oxygen Act'd Sludge ADAF, 2017 f. 110 ft Digesters, 2003 a 2012 g. 4 Belt Presses, 2004 h. 12 KV Power Distribution, 2001-2012 1. Standby Power Generation, 2005 A 201S J. 72 Mgd Primary Treatment, 2004 A 2012 SUB -TOTAL - RECLAMATION PLANT I WORK ORDER 51942-A,B 53709-0 53710-A 53710-8 53710-C 52044-A 53717-0 53719-0 92108-A 5212E-B 51962-0 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 3 MONTHS ENDED 9/30/91 I1 121 fIII 1 SCHEDULE B-I Page 1 of 4 ESTIMATED PROJECTED TOTAL REQUIRED BUDGET 1991-92 ACCUMULATED COST • 6/30/91 CURRENT YEAR OUTLAY TO 9/30191 COMPLETED JOBS TRANSFER TO FIXED ASSETS PROJECT COST TO DATE UNEXPENDED BUDGET I - 3 2.120.000 50,000 (454) (454) $0,000 42,700.000 4,000.000 40.300.081 2,144,227 42,444.308 1.855,773 14.850.000 4,000.000 11.443,739 1,761,797 13,205,536 2,239.203 22,000,000 1,100,000 115.399 847,747 963,146 252.253 26,500,000 12,000.000 5,432,70I 3.959.064 9.391,785 8.040,916 3,900,000 2,000.000 1,224,298 996,492 2.220.780 1.003.518 39,800,000 3,000,000 2,720.051 179.139 2.899.190 2,820.861 34,100,000 1.000.000 (17,344) 30,366 13,022 969,634 11,020.000 500.000 47,835 $4.149 111,983 435,852 1,510,000 500.000 500,000 4,920,000 400,000 400,000 13.100.000 1.000,000 126,6S4 28,386 15S,040 971,614 83.000 25,000 171 103 274 24,897 70.000,000 15,000.000 11.000,000 9,200,000 8,300,000 3,800.000 3,000,000 2.000,000 1,000.000 250,000 50.000 50.000 10,250,000 1,000.000 41,798 26,564 68,362 973.436 5.070,000 t4,950,000 2.600,000 1,300,000 34,000,000 18,200,000 10,920,000 I,099.000 4,914,000 32,500,000 477,958,000 30,625.000 81,434,929 10,038,043 71,472.972 20,586797] c B. Treatment Plant 2 1. Support Facilities and Site Improvements A. Operations Building, P2-23-5-1 b. Warehouse Building, P2-35-2 c. Maintenance Building P2-35-3 d. Construction Management Office, P2-35-4 e. Phase If Site i Security Imp., P2-35-5 2. Misc Mod. i Improv. to Facilities, P2-37 3. Rehab Digester I, J, B, P2-39-1 4. Rehab Digester L, M. P2-39-2 5. Rehab Digester N. 0, P2-39-3 6. Primary Treatment 24 MCD Expansion, P2-41 7. Secondary Treatment Expansion, P2-42-2 S. Equipment Prepurchase, P2-42-2A 9. Electrification Project, P2-42-1 10. Priority "Inc. Mod. i Quake Work, P2-43-1 11. Seismic Upgrading G Struct. Work, P2-43-2 12. Misc. Modifications a Quake Work, P2-43-3 13. Monitor/Control System, P2-44(See J-23-1) 14. fuel System Improvements, B-033-2 15. Standby Power Ceneration 16. Solids Storage: 2 Nina 17. Additional 105 foot Digester 18. Potable Water Distribution System IS.' Plant Water Pump Station 20. Misc. Projects (See Schedule D) 21. Other Master Plan Projects a. Overflow Pump Station, 1990 b. Replace Primary Basins A. B, C, 2006 c. Standby Power Generation, 200S a 2015 d. Monitoring and Control System, 2005 SUB -TOTAL - TREATMENT PLANT 2 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SUMMARY Or JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS FISCAL TEAR 1991-92 3 MONTHS ENDED 9/30/91 f11 (21 /91 SCHEDULE B-1 Page 2 of 4 141 Orl ff.l WORK ORDER ESTIMATED PROJECTED TOTAL REQUIRED BUDGET 1991-92 ACCUMULATED COST a 6/30191 CURRENT YEAR OUTLAY TO 9/30191 COMPLETED JOBS TRANSFER TO FIXED ASSETS PROJECT COST TO DATE UNEXPENDED BUDGET 1 - 3 53715-0 2,750,000 1.500.000 92.902 15,887 108.789 1,484,113 31913-H 4.075,000 500,000 40,887 10,516 51,403 489,484 51813-f 3.373.000 1,000,000 38.531 8,167 46,698 991.833 31813-C 525,000 26.317 2,904 29,221 (2,904) 51813-E 2,305,000 100,000 27,176 2.909 30,085 97.091 51979-0 8,158,000 50,000 (57) (57) 50,600 52045-0 5.300.000 4.000,000 416.333 1,106 417.439 3,998,894 5,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 5,000.000 53714-0 15.000,000 110 2,749 2,859 (2,749) 53718-0 25,200,000 1.000,000 1,166,945 84,248 1.271.193 91S,752 $3718-8 3,000,000 2,000,000 2.448 1,343 3,791 1,998,657 53718-A 11,000,000 6,000.000 1,319.667 511.584 1.831,251 5.488.416 32108-B 3,025.000 500.000 41,967 64,159 106,126 435.841 S2108-C 15.050,000 1.000,000 218,779 58,218 276.997 941,782 3.520.000 1,500.000 1,500,000 52094-0 4.040,000 3,S00,000 02.143 4,321 86,464 3,495,679 51962-H 175.000 50,000 126 3 129 49,997 9,200.000 5,200,000 4,000.000 4,350.000 1,200,OQD 10,400,000 1,000,000 627,190 91.183 718,373 908,817 250,000 11,700,000 16,120,000 520,000 F-179-638.000 24,700,OD0 4.121,464 859,297 4.980,761 23,840,703 C. Reclamation Plant Sites 1. Site Acquisition 2. Reclamation Plant 3 SUB -TOTAL - RECLAMATION PLANTS D. Interplant and Joint Facilities 1. Interplant Focilltea, I-9 a. 120" Interplant line b. Interplant Utility Chase c. Industrial Water Line d. Digester Cas Line a. Ceast unicatlons Cable 2. Support Facilities and Site Improvements a. Admin. Bldg. Expan. A Rehab., 3-7-4AS b. Convert Exet Lab to Office *P1,3-11-1 c. Central Laboratory, J-17 d. Operations/Control Center, 1-23-1 e. Computer Equipment, 3-23-2 (See PZ-44) f. Personnel Building at Pit 1, J-26 g. Demolition of Old Control Center h. Demolition of Support D1dg.eP2, 3-27 3. Central Ceneration Facility a. Equipment Prepurchase, J-19A b. Emission Purchase, 3-19B c. Plant 1 Facility, 3-19-1 d. Plant 2 facility, 3-19-2 Transfer to Project Below Emissions Control for 13kw Emergency 4. Waste Cas flares, J-21, J-21A S. Outfall A Booster Pump Stations a. Replace TO" Outfall Sewer, 3-22-1(Land) b. Repl. Outfall No. 1 Land Section,3-22-2 c. New Surge Tower No. 1, J-22-3 d. Temp C1Z.Station for outfall No. I e. Second Discharge Header ODDS "C" f. Eat. 78" to Deep Water W/120" Outfall 6. Influent Flowmeter A Teat Tacil.,3-24/A/B 7. Preparation of Utility Atlas, J-25 8. Telephone/Telemetry/Henitor(ng Expansion Transfer to Protect Below Pump Stn Telemetry and Monitoring Sys 9. Buahard Interplant Trunk Replacement 10. Electrical Power Systems Rehab. Studies CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVINC FUND SCHEDULE 9-1 SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Page 3 of 4 FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 3 MONTHS ENDED 9/30/91 fll f71 f11 fat (91 f61 WORK ESTIMATED REQUIRED ACCUMULATED CURRENT YEAR COMPLETED JOBS PROJECT UNEXPENDED ORDER PROJECTED BUDCET COST 0UTLAT I TRANSFER TO COST BUDCET TOTAL 1991-92 0 6/30/91 TO 9130191 FIXED ASSETS TO DATE 1 - 3 5.000.000 5.000,000 S,000,000 32133-A 61.000.000 100,000 198,991 16,070 215,061 83,930 $6.000.000 3,100.000 198.991 16.070 215,061 5.083.930 53713-0 41.415 41,415 (41.4151 28.600.000 14.000.000 880.124 890,124 14,000.000 920.000 500,000 500.000 1,020,000 500,000 500,000 130.000 100.000 100.000 51937-0.0 7.500,000 400,000 2,487,747 464,BS4 2.952,601 (64,854) 52093-0 2.082,000 S0,000 27,163 2.904 30,C67 47.096 S3700-0 9,000.000 3.200,000 6,362,2S7 1,S34,345 7.896,602 1,665.655 53712-A 3,675,000 3,130.000 1.101,673 1.101,673 2.020.327 53712-8 1,300.000 300.000 $72.443 23,638 896,001 276.362 53716-0 1.110.000 200.000 30.870 2.904 33,774 197,096 450.000 52084-0 80,000 26,36S 2,904 29.269 (2,904) 53707-C 24,851,000 2.000,000 20,350,863 20.350,863 2.000.000 S3707-A,B 3,724,000 3,OS0,080 3,050,080 53707-A 15.800,000 10.400,000 3,517,706 2.638.310 6,1S6,016 7.761.690 S3707-8 23.350,000 7,000.000 18.886,561 1.652,920 20,539,481 5.347.080 52130-0 1.040,000 5.180 9,421 14,601 (9.421) 52040-0 648.000 350.000 463.253 257.735 720,988 92,265 33711-0 3,112,000 1.000.000 2.120.228 (151,879) 1,968,349 1,151,879 2.000.000 500.000 27,323 27.323 472.677 3,300,000 2,600.000 4.400.000 50,000.000 52065-0 700,000 50,000 611,117 3.172 614.289 46.828 58216-0 3.300.000 500.000 22.425 7,402 29.827 492,598 800.000 200.000 200.000 52146-0 415.000 2,082 2.002 (2.OM 33.000.000 2.000,000 WORK ORDER 11. Sludge Disposal Projects a. Compost Demonstration Plant b. And Acquisition c. Landfill Development Phase I 58207-A d. Compost facility 12. District Information Management Hetwnrk a. Maintenance A Oper Mgmnt Computer System b. Lab Information Management System S2149-8 c. Purchasing/Inventory Control System d. Accounting/financial Information System a. Existing LAN System Upgrades f. Network Linkage Facilities 13. Emissions Controls:13 MW Imerg Ceneratore 14. Mlsc Projects (Sam Schedule K) 15. Other Master Plan Projects a. Replace 78" Outfall with 120" 2009 b. Expand GOBS "C" to North 2019 c. Sludge Disp. Landfill Phase Ik 2011 d. Sludge Diep. Equip Phase I & II 2001 SUB -TOTAL - INTERPLANT & JOINT SUB -TOTAL - MAJOR PROJECTS 2. Special Projects, Studies A Research A. Action Plan: 1. RIDES Permit Application S8209-T 2. Implementation - TQM B. Solids Treatment, Disposal and Reuse Transfer to Project Below Sludge Disposal Related Projects 58214-0 C. Deep Ocean Disposal Evaluation 51759-0 D. Air Quality Control Program 1. Air Toxtca Inventory (AB2S86 w/ PEEP) 58218-0 Transfer to Project Below Air Toxics Emissions Inventory Report (AKIR) and Health Risk Assessment (LIRA) 59218-A 2. VOC/ROC BACT Demonstration Program E. Rater Conservation and Reclamation RAD Projects Transfer to Project Below Santa Ana River Interceptor Utilixatto 58221-0 SUB -TOTAL - SPECIAL PROJECTS 3. Equipment Items SUB -TOTAL - JOINT WORKS CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS COMPLETED AT 6/30/91 SCHEDULE F TOTAL JOINT WORKS CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS CAP tLAT REVOLVING FUND SCHEDULE B-1 SUMMARY OF 10( 4KS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Page 4 of 4 FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 3 MONTHS ENDED 9/30/91 (it 121 t31 (f41 ISl (6) ESTIMATED REQUIRED ACCUMULATED CURRENT YEAR COMPLETED JOBS PROJECT UNEXPENDED PROJECTED BUDCET COST OUTLAY TRANSFER TO COST BUDGET TOTAL 1991-92 • 6130191 TO 9/30/91 FIXED ASSETS TO DATE I - 3 9.000,000 24,000.000 28,600,000 15,611 15,611 30.360.000 900,000 200.000 900.000 750,000 750.000 Sao 325.199 523.879 224,801 421.000 421.000 421.000 500.000 500,000 500,000 200,000 200.000 200,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 1.200.000 700,000 700,000 10.200,000 1,000,000 73.559 60.341 133,900 939,659 20,280,000 27,12S,000 15.600.000 11.350.000 429,623,000 49,001 000 S9,784,232 8.209.663 67 990,895 40.794,337 1,153,219,000 1.09 426 000 12S,539,616 19,120.073 144,659,689 90,305,927 26S,000 45.080 244.948 15.720 260,668 29,280 500,000 200,000 200,000 1,130,000 100.000 100,000 (8,596) (8,596) 8,596 241,S27 8.396 250.123 1,S29,000 50,000 S78,S29 578,529 50,000 3,500,000 1.242.000 200,000 140.282 740.282 200,000 (98,625) (98.625) 423.142 98,525 33,345 98,625 131.970 SS0,000 200.000 200,000 3.150.000 400.000 400,000 (34.542) (34,542) 36.000 34,542 1.458 577 2.035 33,965 12,325,142 1,19S,000 1.840.089 123.518 1.963.607 1.071.482 44.819.000 3,744,000 1,098.129 3S8,037 (773,448) 682.718 3.385.963 1.210,363,142 114.365.000 128,477,634 19,601,628 (773,448) 147.306.014 94,763.372 561.786 32.473 1 594,259 1 (32,473) 129,039,620 19.634,101 (773,448) 147,900,273 1 94.730,899 1,210,363.142 114,36S,000 Beginning Fund Balances, July 1 REVENUES: Tax Levy (Band Fund(s) only) Tax Allocations/Subventions (Share of 1%) Federal and State Construction Grants Connection Fees Other Fees Sale of Capacity Rights Interest & Misc. Receipts other Total Revenue Total Revenue & Beginning Balances COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT 3 MONTHS ENDED 9/30/91 BUDGET RBVIBN 1991-92 Remaining Year -To -Date Budget Year -To -Date Budget 1 Expended ....... --------------------- ............ 19,988,561 0 135 (135) 0.00% 2,345,000 164,589 2,180,411 7.02% 100,000 0 100,000 0.00% 1,615,000 3,817 1,611,183 0.231 6,190,000 9,917 6,180,083 0.16% 1,231,000 0 1,231,000 0.001 2,097,000 489,316 1,607,684 23.331 1,374.000 0 1,374,000 0.00% 14,982,000 667,771 14,314,226 4.46% .----------- 20,656,335 EXPENDITURES: ............. . - shareofJoint works Trmt. Plant & Reserves 25,987,00D 1,910,398 24,076,602 7.35% District Trunk Serer Constr & Reserves 4,434,0OD 1,065 4,432,935 0.02% Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 8,261,000 118,253 8,142,717 1.43% Share of Joint works Operating Expenses 5,051,000 1,095,210 3,955,790 21,68% .Provided for Reimbursement Agreements 0 0 0 0.00% District operating & Other Expenditures 600,00D 69,019 530,981 11,50% Total Expenditures ------------ 44,333,000 ------------ 3,193,915 ............ 41,139,055 ............ 7.20% Ending Fund Balances 17,462,390 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- FACILITIES EIPANSION ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Balance Adjustments Transfer To Balance 7/1/91 & Additions fixed Assets 9/30/91 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: ....... ----------- ------------ ....... ......................... 1-16 SA/Dyer Rd Trunk Modifications 17,255 ------------ 1,065 18,320 Sub -Total 17,255 ............ ............ 1,065 ............ 0 ............ 18,320 Share of Joint works 16,271,634 ............ 1,910,398 ------------ 175,256) ............ 18,106,776 Sub -Total ............ 16,271,634 ............ ------------ 1,910,398 ------------ (75,256) ............ 18,106,176 COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIP: .................................. ------------ ------------ ............ Land and Property Rights 81,398 81,398 Collection Lines and Pump Stas. 5,779,133 5,779,133 Treatment Facilities 0 0 Disposal Facilities 11,593 11,593 General Plant and Admin. Facil. 35,256 35,256 Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 40,258,295 (22,396) 75,256 40,311,155 Other Assets at Cost'Less Amort. 15,049 (41104) 10,945 Total Property Plant & Equip. 62,469,613 1,884,963 0 64,354,576 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 SUMMARY QUAR73RLY FINANCIAL REPORT 3 MONTHS ENDED 9/30/91 ------•----------------------------------------•-------•------------------............--•-------.......-•--------.......----------------------------- BUDGET REVIEW ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1991-92 Regaining Year -To -Date -- -- Budget Year-?o-Date ------------ -.Budget- t Expended ............ Beginning Fund Balances, July 1 137,176,398 REVENUES: Tax Levy (Bond Fund(s) only) 0 0 0 0.00% Tax Allocations/Subventions (Share of 1%) 9,185,00D 821,327 8,463,673 8.85% Federal and State Construction Grants 286,000 0 286,000 0.00% Connection Fees 5,111,D00 1,574,789 3,536,211 30.81% Other Fees 16,575,000 1,839 18,573,161 0.00% Sale of Capacity Rights 3,618,000 0 3,618,ODO 0.00% Interest & Misc. Receipts 7,214,000 1,159,861 6,114,139 15.951 Other 377,000 0 377,ODO ------------ 0.00% ............ Total Revenue ------------ 44,526,00D ------------ 3,557,816 40,968,184 7,990 Total Revenue & Beginning Balances 140,734,214 EXPENDITURES: Share of Joint Works Trat. Plant & Reserves 96,191,000 5,642,840 90,548,160 5.87% District Trunk Sewer Constr & Reserves 15,458,000 2,858,140 12,599,860 18.19% Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 20,227,000 837,105 19,389,595 4.14% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 15,555,000 3,474,387 12,080,613 22.34% Provided for Reisburseaent Agreements 0 0 0 0.00% District Operating & Other Expenditures 2,334,000 ------------ 194.077 ------------ 2,139,923 ------------ 8.32% ------------ Total Expenditures 149,765,000 13,006,849 136,758,151 8.68% Ending Fund Balances 127,727,365 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FACILITIES BEPAASION ---------------------------------------•--•-------•---•--..............-----•--•---...----------------------•-..............-----......-------------- Balance Adjustments Transfer To Balance 7/1/91 & Additions Fixed Assets 9/30/91 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: .......... ........... ............ .......... ......................... 2-30 La Vita Relief Sever 19041 3,205 22,246 Misc Chg to Closed Work order 0 259 259 1-5-2 Orange/Olive /Subtrunks Modif E SA Frvy 1,299 0 1,299 2-29 orangewood Diversion 1,304,778 57,598 1,362,376 2-28 Katella Sever Euclid-Valmut 153,023 0 153,023 2-11-3 N. Branch Rolling Bills Relief Sewer 16 0 16 2-26-1, 2-26-2, 2-26-3 Euclid Interceptor Sever 3,556,921 2,796,885 6,353,806 2-32 Sawpa Trunk Line Diversion Gate & Monitoring Sys 0 193 193 Sub-?otal 5,035,D78 2,858,140 D 7,893,218 Share of Joint Works ------------ 47,757,607 ----------.. ------------ 5,642,840 ------------ (222,2891 ............ 53,178,156 Sub -Total 47,757,607 ------------ ............ 5,642,840 --------•--- ------------ (222,2891 ............ 53,17B,158 CONPLE79D PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIP: ............ ............ ................................. Land and Property Rights 517,694 517,694 Collection Lines and Puip Stos 82,111,827 $2,111,827 Treatment Facilities 0 0 Disposal Facilities 33,172 33,172 General Plant and Admin Facil 68,913 68,913 Equity in Joint Treatment Facil 115,647,557 (66,154) 222,289 115,BD3,692 Other Assets at Cost Less Amort 69,194 (18,113) 51,081 Total Property Plant & equip 251,211,042 8,416,713 0 259,657,755 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT 3 MONTHS ENDED 9/30/91 ----.......-•--------------------------------•---------.........-------------------------•--------------------•----------------------------------------- BUDGET REVIEW -------------------------------------------------------•-------------•-------------------•------........------------------------------------------------ 1991-92 Regaining Year -To -Date Budget Year -To -Date Budget E Expended Beginning Fund Balances, July 1 .......... ............ 129,713,760 ......... ............ REVENUES: Tax Levy (Bond funds) only) 0 1,802 (118021 0.00% Tax Allocations/Subventions (Share of It) 11,815,000 1,051,892 10,763,10E 8.90% Federal and State Construction Grants 313,000 0 313,000 0.00% Connection Fees 2,35D,ODD 414,55D 1,935,450 17.64% Other Fees 19'119'000 (55,511) 19,47(,541 -0.29% Sale of Capacity Rights 3,969,00D 0 3,969,000 0.004 Interest & visc, Receipts 7,207,000 1,148,096 6,058,904 15.93% other D 0 0 D.00% Total Revenue 45,073,OD0 2,560,799 42,512,201 5.684 Total Revenue & Beginning Balances 132,274,559 EXPENDITURES; Share of Joint Works Trit. Plant & Reserves 77,606,000 6,137,619 71,168,381 7.911 District Trunk Sever Constr & Reserves 25,012,00D 90,715 21,921,265 0.36% Bond Retireaent and Interest Expense 19,079,000 412,095 18,666,905 2.16% Share of Joint Works operating Expenses 15,851,000 3,276,775 12,571,225 20.67% Provided for Reigbursesent Agreeoents 0 0 1279,217) 0,004 District operating & Other Expenditures 4,260,DD0 ------------ 279,217 ------------ 4,260,00D ----•------- 0.0% ------------ Total Expenditures 141,808,000 10,196.421 131,611,579 7.19% Ending Fund Balances ------------ 122,078,138 ------------ ------------ ---------•------•------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FACILITIES EXPANSION -----------------------------------•----------------------------........---------...----•-•---------.........------.........------...................... Balance Adjustaents Transfer To Balance 7/1/91 & Additions Fixed Assets 9/30191 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: .......... ........... ------------ ........-- ......................... Seal Beach P/S VFD Upgrade 0 29,853 29,853 Westside P/S Motor Cntrl Ctr Repl 9,370 28,397 37,767 Porch 4 KGD Killer -Holder 0 5 5 11.17 Slater P/S Upgrade - 3 & 11 78,227 27,310 105,537 Dist 3 & 11 Exchange 11,991 0 (11,991) 0 3-21-2 Laapson Interceptor Sever 75,631 5,122 80,756 Orange -Western Subtrunk Relief 3.25 49,898 ------------ 28 ............ ............ 49,926 ............ Sub -Total 225,120 ------------ 90,715 ------------ (11,991) ------------ 303,844 ............ Share of Joint Works 51,973,798 6,137,619 (241,780) 57,869,637 ..........-- Sub-Total ............ 51,973,798 ............ ............ 6,137,619 ............ ------------ (211,780) ........... 57,869,637 ---....----- COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLAIT & EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 280,231 280,231 Collection Lines and Puep Stus 60,640,220 11,991 60,652,211 Treatvent Facilities 9,922 9,922 Disposal Facilities 28,419 28,419 General PIant and Adain Facil 161,235 161,235 Equity in Joint Treatneat Facil 125,698,838 (71,954) 241,780 125,868,664 Other Assets at Cost Less Aaort. 47,057 (9,256) 37,801 Total Property Plant & Equip ..--•- 239,064,840 6,147,124 0 245,211,964 l a COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 SUMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT e 3 HONTNS ENDED 9/30/91 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BUDGET REVIEW --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1991-92 Remaining Year -To -Date Year -To -Date % Expended \ J .-Budget-- --Budget- Beginning Fund Balances, July 1 37,497,212 REVENUES: Tax Levy (Bond fund(s) only) 0 116 1116) 0.001 Tax Allocations/Subventions (Share of 1%) 2,7BO,00D 250,595 2,529,401 9.01% Federal and state Construction Grants 48,000 0 48,000 0.00% Connection Fees 353,000 (45,494) 398,194 -12.89% Other Pees 2,233,000 1,457 2,228,543 0.20% Sale of Capacity Rights 596,D00 0 596,000 0.003 Interest & Hisc. Receipts 1,884,000 252,486 1,631,514 13.40% Other 1,209,000 0 1,209,000 ------------ 0.00% ............ Total Revenue ------------ 9,103,OOD ............ 462,161 8,640,839 5.08% Total Revenue & Beginning Balances ------------ 37,954 373 EXPENDITURES: ............. . ShareofJoint Works Trat. plant & Reserves 17,535,000 926,729 16,608,271 5.29% District Trunk Sewer Constr & Reserves 11,965,000 34,008 11,930,992 0.29% Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 3,866,000 402,156 3,463,814 10.101 Share Of Joint Works Operating Expenses 2,450,00D 416,770 2,033,23D 17,01% Provided for Reimbursement Agreements 109,000 0 109,000 0.001 District operating & Other Expenditures 776,000 ............ 68,545 ............ 707,455 ............ 8.83% ------------ Total Expenditures 36,701,000 1,848,2DB 34,852,792 5.04% Ending Fund Balances 36,111,165 `� --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FACILITIES EXPANSION --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Balance Adjustments Transfer To Balance 7/1/91 & Additions fixed Assets 9/30/91 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: .......... ........... ............ ---------- 5-10 Car Del Ear PIS 8,230 170 8,400 Study Balboa Trunk A 84 0 84 5-34 Bayside Or Trunk Sewer Impr Phases 1,2 & 3 174,658 59,761 231,419 5-33 Bay Bridge PIS Iapr 125,228 2,267 127,495 5-35 So. Coast Trunk Sewer -Intl Phases 1 & 2 131,966 0 131,966 5-36 Crystal Cove PIS 60,529 3,429 63,�58 5-29 Coast force Bain Replacement 5 & 6 79,956 (43,476) 36,490 5-31 Bitter Pt & Rocky Pt PIS Improvements 5 & 6 29,516 29,516 Trunkline odor & Corrosion Cntrl Pilot Study 24,364 21,364 5-38 siphon I SAR Siphon 5 & 6 7,754 7,754 5-39 Siphon 5 & 6 23,851 11,857 35,708 Sub -Total 666,136 ............ 34,008 0 700,144 Share of Joint Works 7,877,962 ............ ............ 926,729 ------------ (36,507) ------------ 8,768,184 Sut-Total 7,877,962 ............ ............ 926,729 ------------ ------------ (36,5071 ............ 8,768,184 COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIP: .................................. ............ ............ Land and Property Rights 6,231 6,231 Collection Lines and Pump Stns 23,481,345 23,481,515 Treatment Facilities 7,347 7,347 Disposal facilities 7,115 7,115 / General Plant and Admin Facil 21,851 24,851 `J Equity in Joint Treatment Facil 18,285,533 110,8651 36,507 18,311,175 Other Assets at Cost Less Amort. 97,462 (5,221) 92,241 Total Property Plant & Equip 50,454,182 944,651 0 51,398,833 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT 3 MONTHS ENDED 9/30/91 BUDGET REVIEW ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------.... 1991-92 Remaining Year -To -Date Budget Year -To -Date Budget I Expended Beginning Fund Balances, July 1 18,381,858 REVENUES: • Tax Levy (Bond fund(s) only) 0 0 0 0.00% Tax Allocations/Subventions (Share of It) 1,505,000 131,992 1,373,008 8.77t• Federal and State Construction Grants 53,000 0 53,000 0.00% Connection Pees 235,0DO 118,256 116,744 50.32% other Fees 3,265,000 144,634) 3,309,634 -1.37% Sale of Capacity Rights 705,ODO 0 705,000 0.00% Interest & Rise. Receipts 982,000 198,918 793,082 20.26% other 0 0 0 0.00% Total Revenue ------...... 6,745,06D ............ 104,532 ------------ 6,340,468 ------------ 6.00% Total Revenue & Beginning Balances 18,786,390 EXPENDITURES: ------------- Share of Joint Works Tret. Plant & Reserves 12,202,000 1,099,510 11,102,490 9.011 District Trunk Sever Constr & Reserves 2,467,000 17,296 2.449,704 O.7Dt Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 2,032,000 112,507 1,889,493 0.00% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 2,728,000 555,572 2,172,128 2D.37t Provided for Reimbursement Agreements 0 0 0 0.00% District Operating & Other Expenditures 271,000 46,284 224,716 17.08t Total Expenditures ------------ 19,700,000 ............ 1,861,169 ............ 17,838,B31 ............ 9.45% Ending Fund Balances ------------ 16,925,221 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FACILITIES EXPANSION -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Balance Adjustoents Transfer To Balance 7/1191 ---------- & Additions ----------- Fixed Assets ------------ 9,130/91 .......... CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Airbase A & B Nag Meter 52 52 6-12 Fairview Relief 240,161 0 210,164 14-1-1 A & B Gisler Int., 14-1-2 Baker Street 0 Force Main, Districts 6, 7 & 14 105,850 18,960 124,810 5-29 Coast Force Main Repplacement 5 & 6 4,208 (2,288) 11920 5-32 Bitter Pt & Rocky Pt P/S Improvements 5 & 6 10,735 10,735 Trunkline Odor & Corrosion Cntrl Pilot Study 5 & 6 24,363 24,363 5.38 Siphon F SAR Siphon 5 & 6 18,092 18,092 5-39 Dist 5 & 6 Siphon & the SAR Siphon/?It 2 1,255 621 1,879 Sub-Total ............ 104,719 ------------ 17,295 ------------------------ 0 422,015 Share of Joint Works ............ 9,210,854 ............ 1,099,510 ............ ............ ............ (43,3131 10,267,051 ............ ............ Sub -Total ------------ 9,210,854 ------------ 1,099,510 ............ (43,3131 10,267,051 ............ ............ COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 552 562 Collection Lines and Pump Stos 1,787,901 1,787,901 Treatment Facilities 2,653 2,653 Disposal Facilities 7,394 7,394 General Plant and Admit Facil 84,352 $4,362 Equity in Joint Treatment Facil 21,630,551 (12,8901 13,313 21,86D,974 other Assets at Cost Less Aeort. 24,366 11,3051 23,061 Total Property Plant & Equip ------------ ------------ 33,353,362 1,102,611 ------------------------ ------------............ 0 34,455,973 ------------------------ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 SUwBY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT 3 KOAIR 5 ENDED 9/30/91 ............................... BUDGET REVIEW 1991-92 Remaining Year -To -Date Budget Year -To -Date Budget 1 Expended .......... ............ ......... ------------ `� Beginning Fund Balances, July 1 56,764_913-- REVENUES: Tar Levy (Boad Puad(s) only) 0 0 0 0.00% Tar Allocations/Subventions (Share of 111 1,777,000 386,221 1,390,779 8.09% Federal and State Construction Grants 75,000 0 75,000 0.00% Connection Pees 1,880,0DO 07,890 1,792,110 1.67% other Pees 1,621,000 94,962 4,526,038 2.061 Sale of Capacity Rights - 97B4O00 0 978,00D 0.001 Interest & Misc. Receipts 2,948,000 744,590 2,203,110 25.261 Other 1,000,ODO 0 1,000,000 0.001 Total Revenue 16,279,ODD 1,313,663 11,965,337 8.07% Total Revenue & Beginning Balances S8 078 576 EIPENDITURIS: .Share of Joint Works Tat. Plant & Reserves 22;312,000 1,500,015 20,811,955 6.721 District Trunk Serer Constr & Reserves 22,170,000 693,189 21,276,811 4,03% Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 4,671,000 331,309 1,336,691 7.16% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 3,810,000 654,695 3,185,305 17.05% Provided for Reimbursement Agreements 0 0 0 0.00% District Operating & Other Expenditures 1,595,000 ............ 104,765 ------------ 1,190,235 ............ 6.57% ------------ Total Expenditures 54,588,000 3,487,003 ------------ 51,100,997 6.391 Ending fund Balances 51,591,573 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FACILITIES IVANSION ....................................................................................................................................-----........-- Balance Adjustments Transfer To Balance 7/1/91 & Additions fixed Assets 9/30/91 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: .......... ----------- ------------ .......... ------------------------- 7-16 Lemon Heights Serer 288 7,244 1,532 7-15 Cranford Canyon 12,824 123,086 136,710 7-31-2 INN-Nvprt Subtrunk Relief Serer 5,975 41198 10,173 Agrmt W/Coste Mesa Re fairviev Subtrnnk Barer 26,983 0 26,983 Sur Ktce & Easement Index Books 13,237 0 13,237 7-11 Abandon 9 P/S 77,392 -3,630 811022 7-6-1-1 Sonflover Iot 15,252 497 15,739 7-13 Campus Relief Sever 7 4,501 4,511 Main Street Plume Ladder - Late Charge 0 9 9 7-11-1,2,3 Abandonment and Modlfn of P/S 1.661,433 270,137 1,931,570 Kato Street P/S 7-7-1 11,501 0 11,501 14-1-1 A & B Gisler Iot., 14-1.2 Baker Street 0 farce Kato Districts 6, 7 & 14 1,514,603 434,561 11949,161 Sever Design for East Tustin Specific Plan 17,796 D 17,798 Reconstruct Siphon at A.D. 14 5,132 11,533 49,665 D Sub-Total ............ 3,362,425 ............ ------------ 893,189 ............ ............ 0 ....-------- 41255,611 Share of Joint Works 12,669,887 ------------ 1,500,015 ------------ ............ (59,091) ............ 14,110,811 Sub4otal 12,669,807 ------------ 1,500,015 ............ ------------ (59,091) ------------ ............ 14,110,811 COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIP: .................................. ............ Land and Property Rights 276,451 176,454 Collection Lines and Pump Stos 26,716,75S 26,716,755 Treatment Facilities 0 0 Disposal facilities 10,782 10,782 General Plant and Admfn facil 17,957 17,957 Equity in Joint Treatment facil 29,679,506 (17,5851 59,091 29.721,014 Other Assets at Cost Less Amort. 57,056 (3,721) 53,335 Tot aI Property Plant & Equip ............ 72,790,824 ............ 2,371,928 ............ 0 ............ 75,162,152 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 SUNNARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 WORTHS ENDED 9/30/91 BUDGET REVIEW -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1991-92 Regaining Year -To -Date _.Budget -_ --------Date Budget ; Expended Beginning Fund Balances, July 1 10,519,229 REVENUES: Tax Levy (Bond Funds) only) 12,000 2,296 9,704 19.13% Tax Allocations/Subventions (Share of 1%) 2,625,OOD 237,141 2,387,859 9.03% Federal and State Construction Grants 66,000 0 66,000 0.00% Connection Pees 1,763,000 168,272 1,591,720 9.54% Other Fees 4,096,000 (435,2201 1,533,220 -10.62% Sale of Capacity Rights 8D4,000 0 801,000 0.00% Interest & Nisc. Receipts 1,549,000 315,578 1,233,422 20.371 Other 1,362,000 0 1,362,000 0.001 Total Revenue ------------ 12,279,000 ............ 288,067 ............ 11,990,933 ............ 2.3S1 Total Revenue & Beginning Balances 40,837,296 EXPENDITURES: Share of Joint Works Trat. Plant & Reserves 12,882,000 1,242,838 11,639,162 9.65% District Trunk Serer Constr & Reserves 9,630,000 169,581 9,460,419 1.76%, Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 2,870,D00 176,973 2,693,027 6.171 Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 3,140,000 624,510 2,515,490 19.89% Provided for Reimbursement Agreements D 0 D 0.001 District Operating & Other Expenditures 978,DOD 71,354 906,646 MR Total Expenditures ------....-- 29,500,000 ............ 2,285,256 ------------ 27,214,744 ............ 7.75% Ending Fund Balances 38,552,04D -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FACILITIES EXPANSION --------------------------------------------------------------------•---........------....-------------------------------------------------------------- BaIance Adjustments Transfer To Balance 7/1/91 & Additions fixed Assets 9/30/91 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: .......... ----------- ............ ---------- 11-17 Slater P/S Savage Sys Improvements 354,302 ----------- 169,581 ------------ 523,883 Sub-Total 354,3D2 .169,581 ............ 0 .........--- 523,883 Share of Joint Works ------------ 10,625,736 ------------ ............ 1,212,838 ------------ ------------ (48,959) ------------ ............ 11,819,615 Sub -Total 10,525,736 ------------ 1,212,838 ............ (48,9591 ------------ ............ 11,819,615 ------------ COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIP: ---------------------------------- Land and Property Rights 146,986 116,986 Collection Lines and Pump Stns 19,011,158 19,011,158 Treatment Facilities 0 0 Disposal Facilities 3,053 3,053 General Plant and Admin Facil 28,164 28,164 Equity in Joint Treatment Facil 21.462,326 (11,570) 48,959 21,496,715 Other Assets at Cost Less Mort. 2,876 ------------ 17641 ------------ 2,112 Total Property plant & Equip 54,634,601 1,397,085 ------------ 0 ............ 56,031,686 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT RO. 13 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT 3 MONTHS ENDED 9/30/91 ..........^--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BUDGET REVIEW ----------------------------------------------------------------------------•----.........------------......---------------------...------------... 1991-92 Regaining Year -To -Date Budget Year -To -Date Budget 1 Expended Beginning Fund Balances, July 1 10,158,215 REVENUES: Tax Levy (Bend Fund(s) only( 0 0 0 0.001 Tax Allocations/Subventions (Share of 1%) 0 0 0 D.Do1 Federal and State Construction Grants 3,000 0 3,000 0.00% Connection fees 2,350,ODO 208,600 2,141,400 8.88% Other fees 670,000 9,230 660,770 1,38% Sale -of Capacity Rights 56,DD0 0 56,DD0 0.001 Interest & Misc. Receipts e67,000 216,742 650,258 25.00% Other D 0 0 0.001 Total Revenue _......... 3,916,000 ............ 431,572 ............ 3,511,128 ............ 11.D11 Total Revenue & Beginning Balances 10,892,787 - EXPENDITURES: Share of Joint Works Trot. Plant & Reserves 7,754,000 - 86,390 7,667,610 1.111 District Trunk Sever Constr & Reserves 5,325,000 0 5,325,000 0.00% Bond Retireeent and Interest Expense 43,000 2,417 40,583 0.001 Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 319,000 89,010 229,990 27,90% Provided for Reinbursenent Agreesents 0 0 0 0.001 District operating & Other Expenditures 197,D00 ........... 9,D71 ............ 187,929 ............ 4.601 ............ Total Expenditures 13,638,000 186,886 13,451,112 1.37% Ending Fund Balances 10,705,899 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- FACILITIES EXPANSION ----------------------------------------- Balance --------- --------------------------------------------------- Adjustaents Transfer To Balance 1/1/91 & Additions Fixed Assets 9/3D/91 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: ---------- ----------- ............ .......... ------------------------- Share of Joint Works 664,585 86,390 (3,403) 747,572 Sub-Total ------------ 664,585 ------------ ............ 86,390 ............ 13,103) ......------ 747,572 COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIP: ---------------------------------- ............ ............ ------------ Land and Property Rights 0 0 Collection Lines and Punp Stns O 0 Treateent Facilities 0 0 Disposal Facilities 0 0 General Plant and Main Facil 0 0 Equity in Joint Treatnent Facil 1,776,486 (3,216) 3,403 1.776,673 Other Assets at Cost Less Hurt 24,907 ............ (6,793) I8,114 Total Property Plant & Equip 2,465,978 ............ 76,381 ............ 0 ............ 2,542,359 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14 SUMMARY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT 3 MONTHS ENDED 3/30/91 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BUDGET REVIEW 1991-92 Budget Year -To -Date ---------- ............ Beginning Fund Balances, July 1 REVENUES: Tax Levy (Bond Fund(s) only) Tax Allocations/Subventions (Share of 1%) Federal and State Construction Grants IRWD Fees Other Fees Sale of Capacity Rights Interest & Rise. Receipts Other Total Revenue Total Revenue & Beginning Balance EBPBNDITURES: share of Joint Storks Trat. Plant & Reserves District Trunk Sewer Constr & Reserves Bond Retirement and Interest Expense Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses Provided for Reimbursement Agreements District operating & other Expenditures Total Expenditures Ending Fund Balances ................................................. CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: ......................... 14-1-1 A & B Gisler Int., 14-1-2 Baker Street Force Main, Districts 6, 7 & 14 Main St. Pump Station Improvements 7.7-1 Sub -Total Share of Joint Works Sub -Total COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIP: ---.... -... ------------.... ------ Land and Property Rights Collection Lines and Pump Stns Treatment Facilities Disposal Facilities General Plant and Admin Facil Equity in Joint Treatment Facil Other Assets at Cost Less Aaort. Total Property Plant & Equip 0 0 56,000 7,255,DOD 0 699,000 148,000 267,DOD 8,125,DOD 6,299,000 3,655,ODD 17,000 1,097,000 0 367,000 11,445,000 27,584,653 ------------ 0 0 1,185,663 250 0 25,600 0 1,211,513 28,796,166 1,087,729 1,049,518 14,221 209,905 0 9,436 2.370,BD9 26,425,357 Remaining Budget 0 0 56,000 6,069,337 (250) 699,000 122,100 267,000 7,213,487 5,211,271 2,615,482 2,779 887,095 0 357,564 9,074,191 ------------- Year-To-Date 3 Expended 0.00% 0.00! 0.00% 16.34% 0.00% 0.00% 17.3D% 0.00% 14.38`; 17.27% 28,51% 0100% 19.13% 0.00% 2.57% 20.71% FACILITIES EXPANSION ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Balance Adjustments Transfer To Balance 711/91 & Additions Fixed Assets 9130/91 0 3,904,188 1,049,518 4,953,706 27,927 ------------ 0 ............ ............ 27,527 ........... 3,932,115 ------------ 1,049,518 ------------ 0 ------------ 4,981,633 ........... 9,222,799 ------------ 1,087,729 ------------ 142,849) ............ 10,267,579 ------------ 9,222,799 ------------ 1,087,729 ------------ (42,849) ............ 10,267,679 ------------ 0 11,137,289 0 0 6,747 21,650,511 27,009 45,976,470 159,940) (7,366) 2,069,941 42,849 0 0 11,131,289 D G 6,747 21,633,42D 19,643 l8,096,411 W" RE; AGENDA ITEM N0, 13 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ni ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA November 21, 1991 10844 Et LIS AVENUE P.o Box 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNTA 92728.8127 (714)962-2411 REPORT OF CONSERVATION RECYCLE AND REUSE COMMITTEE Meeting Date: November 21— 1991 - 6:00 p.m. COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF MEMBERS: Present: Present: John C. Cox, Jr., Chairman J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Burnie Dunlap Blake P. Anderson, Director of Richard B. Edgar Technical Services Frank Laszlo Charles Nichols, Conservation, Glenn Parker Recycle and Reuse Manager Iry Pickler Carolyn Bruskin, Principal Leslie A. Pontious Environmental Specialist Phil Sansone Mike Moore, Principal Environmental Peer Swan Specialist Grace Winchell Susan M. Bradford, Principal Environmental Specialist Absent: Others Present: Carrey J. Nelson Betty Mrgudich, General Counsel's Arthur G. Newton Office Mike Moynahan, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Matt Puffer, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Ed Aghjayan, Anaheim Public Utilities Darrell Ament, Anaheim Public Utilities Rose Ament Atossa Soltani, Anaheim Public utilities Report of Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee November 21, 1991 PROPOSED_ ANAHEIM[MWD/CSDOC ULF TOILET AND LF SHOWERHEAD RETROFIT PILOT PROJECT Background• In October, the Committee submitted a written report and recommendation to the Joint Boards to amend the Districts Water Conservation Implementation Plan, Phases I - IV, to include a proposed pilot project between the City of Anaheim, Metropolitan Water District (MWD) and the Sanitation Districts for an ultra low flush (ULF) toilet and low flow showerhead retrofit program in Anaheim, at a cost to be shared by MWD ($456,100), the City ($315,478) and the Districts ($315,471). The proposed pilot project would retrofit 4,000 homes and 1,000 hotel/motel rooms and would replace a previously approved retrofit of 1,720 hotel/motel rooms costing $44,290 to the Districts. After considerable discussion, the Joint Boards elected not to approve the proposal and returned it to the Committee for further study and additional information. The Issue Before the Committee: The General Manager reported that water conservation has not traditionally been the role of a wastewater management agency. Prior to adoption of 112020 VISION", the Districts water conservation efforts focused on reducing industrial discharges through our source control program. However, the 30-year Action Plan approved by the Boards in 1989 formally established an aggressive water conservation program as a major policy of the Districts. The benefits are many, some to the Districts, some to other entities, all to the public. Conservation saves capital and operating costs of developing and delivering water resources by reducing demand. Conservation saves capital and operating costs of sewage collection, treatment and disposal by reducing sewer discharges. Conservation preserves our limited supply of precious water. Conservation is simply the right thing to do. Up to this point, the Districts have been systematically easing into their water conservation program. The major efforts to date have been directed towards public education and pilot projects with other public and private partners to determine the most effective conservation measures for the Districts to be involved in. The Committee's position has been to consider projects on a case by case basis, for the most part as they have -2- Report of Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee November 21, 1991 been proposed to the Districts by other agencies. The Boards have approved four projects. The proposed Anaheim project is the largest to date. As summarized in the enclosed staff report, the proposed Anaheim project demonstrates that through such partnerships, investment in water conservation programs can achieve the goals and objectives stated above to the benefit of all the participants and the public at large. However, because of the size of our operation, to realize any true savings, we cannot be satisfied with limited, relatively small projects saving a few million gallons. If the program stops with the proposed Anaheim project there would not be a favorable return on our investment (other than conserving water) because it alone is not large enough to avoid constructing an increment of treatment. The Districts, to truly realize the projected payback, must participate in programs that will cumulatively save tens of millions of gallons to avoid construction of logical increments of wastewater treatment facilities. Mr. Sylvester stated that the policy issue before the Committee, therefore, is whether the Distracts' Boards wish to assume and commit to the leadership role in the County and actively solicit participation from the cities and other water and sewering agencies within our jurisdictional boundaries, and MWD, to participate as partners in programs similar to the proposed Anaheim project. There are certainly risks associated with such an effort. The costs are high, but if we can get substantial participation on a Districts' -wide basis, the benefits are even higher. PronoseddAnaheim Pilot Project Staff made a presentation to the Committee addressing the areas of water resource management, population growth, impact of growth on public services and utilities, and the importance of water conservation to the Districts. There was discussion on why this water conservation proposal would have an impact on our 301(h) waiver renewal application. Staff responded with background information on Section 301(h) of the federal Clean Water Act that states certain discharges are waived from going to full secondary treatment. Staff believes that proposals like the Anaheim project would help demonstrate to the Environmental Protection Agency that the Districts are doing effective wastewater management and attempting to minimize additional environmental impact by reducing wastewater flows. -3- Report of Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee November 21, 1991 Conservation measures are also a condition of one of the Clean Water construction grants the Districts received from state and federal agencies. The Committee discussion addressed several issues including the fairness to all cities in the Districts' service area of joint funding some projects but not others. Fairness was of concern from two perspectives. One concerned cities that might not be ready to fund water conservation projects and could therefore lose the opportunity, while some cities might not be eligible for funds for already accomplished projects. This could be an especially important issue if MWD does not continue its funding support of conservation retrofit projects. The Committee further discussed that the proposed Anaheim project may not be cost-effective on a stand-alone basis unless other similar projects are also accomplished. This aspect of the project economics results from not being able to count the capital savings until a 6 mgd increment of flow savings has been realized. The 6 mgd increment relates to the size of treatment modules constructed by the Districts. To achieve the first increment of capital savings the Districts would need to retrofit about 10% of the equivalent dwelling units in the entire service area. The O&M savings for the project are substantial but do not offset the cost of the Districts' portion of the project. It was noted that this Anaheim proposal is a pilot project that would reach about 0.6% of the Districts equivalent dwelling units. The Committee also discussed prioritizing the Districts water conservation efforts to first focus on the most cost- effective results. It may be appropriate to first focus on certain types of high volume water users, such as hotels and motels. It may also be important to first focus on showerheads and then toilets in order to maximize cost-effectiveness. Mike Moynahan, Manager of Water Conservation Programs for the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) gave a presentation using slides on MWD's program as a wholesale water agency in Southern California. He stressed the fact that water conservation programs are a real savings in the water supply picture as it relates to protecting the existing water supply and commented on MWD's policy of implementing various programs as part of their overall water conservation plan. The water conservation programs are also part of MWD's commitment to Best Management Practices (BMP) and plays a significant part in water policy in the State of California and is demonstrated by their signing of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) regarding Urban -4- Report of Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee November 21, 1991 Water Conservation in California. He encouraged the Sanitation Districts to participate in the BMP process and be a signatory to the MOU. Mr. Moynahan also touched on the status of MWD's board deliberations pertaining to funding future water conservation retrofits. The Board has agreed to fund the existing proposals for ultra low -flush toilet programs, including the Anaheim Project, but has temporarily halted funding new conservation proposals. He could not make any guarantees as to the funding of future programs, but stressed that the Board's direction looks favorable towards funding and implementing future water conservation programs. Ed Aghjayan, General Manager of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department, spoke about the retrofit project with the City of Anaheim and reflected on how MWD's idea of mobilizing efforts among the other water agencies, utilities and private enterprises to implement effective water conservation programs is essential to good water management for a water agency. The proposed Anaheim project would provide up to $100 per toilet rebate incentives to homeowners for up to 4,000 households. Also, similar incentives would be offered for up to 1,000 hotel and motel rooms in the city. Table 1 summarizes the savings and costs of implementing the proposed Anaheim Phase II project. The total project costs and the partnership shares are shown in Table 2. Table 1 Estimated Savings of Anaheim ULF Toilet and Showerhead Retrofit Project O&M Capital Total Cost to Net Savings Savings Savings District Savings to Districts Net $155,900 $400,000 $555,900 $269,990 $285,910 Residential Savings Net Hotel & $16,200 $45,000 $61,200 $45,481 $15,719 Motel Savings $172,100 1 $445,000 $617,100 $315,471 $301,629 -5- Report of Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee November 21, 1991 TABLE 2 Project Costs and Sharing Summary Agency Percent Share of Total Project Costs by Agency MWD 42% $ 456,100 City 29% $ 315,478 CSDOC 29% $ 315,471 Totals 100% $1,087,049 Districts -wide Implementation of Retrofit Program Staff reported that at the request of the Directors, at the October meeting, staff conducted a preliminary evaluation of the potential costs and savings of implementing a comprehensive plumbing retrofit program throughout the Districts' service area. Such a project would be the largest of its kind anywhere in the nation and perhaps the world. A Districts' -wide conservation retrofit program would include over 800.000 equivalent dwelling units in the service area. This could include as many as 80,000 commercial and industrial outlets. From our preliminary analysis, we have conservatively estimated the potential wastewater savings to equal 62.4* mgd. The costs of implementing such a proposal are potentially substantial. Table 3 summarizes these costs and the relative shares by agency category based on the Anaheim model. These costs are believed to be a worst case maximum for several reasons. First, such a large retrofit program would cause the manufacturer's unit cost for ULF toilets and LF showerheads to drop. Second, it was assumed we would retrofit all equivalent dwelling units. Third, it was conservatively assumed no other partners would enter the program (other than a three-way (*Revised from original report to reflect savings of low flow showerheads. Original information included only ULF toilets.) CM Report of Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee November 21, 1991 -� partnership such as in the Anaheim model). Fourth, it was assumed no state or federal legislation would be adopted to mandate plumbing retrofits. TABLE 3 Project Costs and Sharing Summary Agency Percent Share of Total Project Costs by Agency MWD 42% $ 83.2 million Cities or Water Dists. 29% $ 57.4 million CSDOC 29% $ 57.4 million Totals 100% $198.0 million The estimated costs and potential benefits to the Districts are summarized in Table 4. This table shows that for an estimated flow savings of 62.4* mgd, the net savings to the Districts is estimated to equal $63.3* million. These savings result from O&M savings plus avoided capital costs for the construction of facilities such as headworks, pump stations, �- pipelines primary clarifiers, power systems and related equipment. TABLE 4 (Revised)* Estimated Project Costs and Savings for Districts -Wide ULF and LF Showerhead Retrofit Project Estimated O&M Capital Total Total Net Flow Savings Savings Estimated Estimated Savings Savings (Present (Present Savings Cost to to Worth) Worth) Districts Districts 62.4* $31.7 $89* $120.7* $57.4 $63.3* mgd Million Million Million Million Million (*Revised from original report to reflect savings of low flow showerheads. Original information included only ULF toilets.) -7- Report of Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee November 21, 1991 All of these estimates assume the Anaheim model of a three- way partnership between MWD, the local City or water agency and the Districts. Committee Actions Direction to Staff: The Committee directed staff to investigate and to report back to the Committee on the feasibility of the Districts assuming a leadership role and enlisting the cities and other water and sewering agencies, as well as private interests, to participate in a Districts' -wide water conservation retrofit program. The objective would be to obtain at least a 10% market penetration of the residences in the Districts service area with ultra low -flush toilet and/or low - flow showerhead programs that would enable the Districts to reach at least a 6 mgd flow savings. The direction outlined is as follows: 1. Staff will meet with representatives of MWD and cities, water agencies, other sewering agencies and private interests who might be interested in participating and implementing such a program. 2. Staff will evaluate the costs of implementing a District -wide retrofit and the costs for each of the participants. 3. Staff will evaluate the cost-effectiveness of implementing only an ultra low -flush toilet program versus implementing only a low -flow showerhead program. Recommendation: On a split note, the Committee held in abeyance a recommendation on the residential portion ($269,990) of the proposed Anaheim retrofit project, pending the outcome of the staff's discussions with other agencies in relation to participation in a Districts' -wide plumbing fixture retrofit program. The Committee recommends that the Districts' Water Conservation Implementation Program be amended to delete the previously approved Phase II - 10% Hotel/Motel Retrofit in Anaheim (1,720 rooms at a Districts' share of the cost of $44,290); and replace it with the proposed Phase II - Hotel/Motel (only) ULF Toilet/LF Showerhead Retrofit Program in Anaheim (1,000 rooms at a Districts' share of the cost of $45,481) in cooperation with the City of Anaheim and Metropolitan Water District, copy attached; and that payment to the City of Anaheim -8- Report of Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee November 21, 1991 in an amount not to exceed $45,481 be authorized. The difference between the original proposed project at a total cost to the Districts of $44,290 and the new proposed project at a total cost to the Districts now at $45,481 is the result of labor costs for project administration that were previously omitted in the original estimate. The shared percent of the hotel/motel project costs for Anaheim and the Districts changes from 29% to 34%. This change results from a lower amount of total water savings compared to the residential part of the project. Therefore, MWD's percent share reduces from 42% to 32%. The remaining 10% of project costs is paid by Anaheim and the Districts. Directors Dunlap and Parker requested that their vote in opposition to the hotel/motel retrofit recommendation be made a matter of record. ref #130564.rp MM WATER CONSERVATION PHASE II - HOTEL MO ' �� ULF TOILET LF H WERHEAD RETROFIT IN ANAHEIM / S 0 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Phase II Page 1 of 2 ACTION CATEGORY SCHEDULE RESPONSIBILITIES COSTS VERIFICATION Retrofit a total of 1,000 toilets and ULFT 12/1/90: CSDOC, Program representatives showerheads in hotels and motels in the Phase II Meeting with CSDOC and City City of Anaheim, Hotel/Motel: will visit retrofit sites of City of Anaheim with Ultra Low -Flush of Anaheim. & MWD 1,000 toilets @ approx. the hotels and motels and toilets (ULFT) and Low -Flow $100 per toilet inspect the products showerheads (LFS). 12/1/90 - 2/15191: 1 per room = $100,000 installed and prepare a Select lighting consultant & room -by -room inventory. Offer financial incentives in the way of lighting contractors, and 1,000 showerheads rebates to install ULFT'a and LFS. execute any necessary 1 per room = $5,250 Progam will offer as an addtional contracts. incentive, an economic and convenient Labor = $8,000 means of disposing of customer's old 12/1/90 - 2/15/91: toilets. Prepare list of qualified Documentation = $20,000 contractors. Program is a 1 year project and is TOTAL HOTEL/MOTEL dependent on customer reponse rate. It 12115190: COSTS: $133,250 is anticipated the program will last 1 Complete the development of year and may be completed sooner. all necessary computer models Cost breakdown to quantify water, sewer, lighting, air conditioning and MWD common area savings. 5154/AF Total $42,285 12/15/90: Complete the development of Anaheim computer models to track Total $45,484 Phase 11 & III of program (i.e. date letter mailed to customer CSDOC and date customer responded). Total $ 45,481 1/15/91 - 2/15/91: Prepare and complete program TOTAL PROGRAM announcements, program fact COSTS: 8133�250 sheets, letter to customers, news releases, customer agreement forms, and inventory forms. 1 2/ 8/91: ' Anaheim's start of showerhead project. No CSDOC contribution at this time. 2 2/ 8/91: CSDOC's Conservation, Reclamation & Reuse (CRR) Committoe's approval and recommendation to the Boards. 3 1/ 3191: CSDOC Boards approval of program, contingent upon successful demonstration of cost effectiveness. For additional information contact Carolyn Bruskin, CSDOC, @ (714) 902-2411 Ext. 3652 Revised 11/27/91 f FFi WATER CONSERVATION _ II - ULFT RETROFIT IN ANAHEIM VCounty Sanitation Districts of Orange County Phase II Page 2 of 2 ACTION CATEGORY SCHEDULE RESPONSIBILITIES COSTS VERIFICATION 10/1 /91: Anaheim's start of ULF toilet program. 9 26 91: CSDOC CRR committee approval of scope change and funding. 10991: CSDOC Boards approval of scope change and funding. 10/1 /92: End of Phase IL For additional information contact Carolyn Bruskin, CSDOC, @ (714) 962-241 1 Ext. 3652 Revised 8/29/91 Mw how .00 Mw NOW ww low h" Mw WEI imw aw STAFF REPORT ULTRA LOW -FLUSH TOILET AND LOW FLOW SHOWERHEAD RETROFIT PROJECTS County Sanitation Districts of Orange County November, 1991 W1W Wd Item TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. List of Exhibits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii MW List of Appendices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 a. Introduction and Overview . . . . . . . . . 1 how b. Legislative, Regulatory and . . . . . . . . 1 Local Interactions C. Summary of Master Plan Public . . . . . . . 4 Comment on Water Conservation r Phase II: Anaheim/MWDICSDOC ULF Toilet and . . . . 5 Showerhead Retrofit Project a. Basis for the Districts' Water . . . . . . 5 Conservation Flows b. Performance of ULF Toilets . . . . . . . . 9 C. Performance of LF Showerheads . . . . . . . 10 d. Basis for Operation and Maintenance . . . . 10 Savings e. Basis for Capital Savings . . . . . . . . . 12 f. Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . 14 Districts -Wide Implementation of Retrofit Proaram. . 14 bmi a. Estimate of Districts' Water . . . . . . . 15 Conservation Flows y b. Estimate of the Costs to . . . . . . . . . 15 Implement i WW ww r TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont) Item Page No. tow C. Estimate of the Operation and Maintenance .'16 Savings' d. Estimate of the Capital Savings . . . i 16 e. Implementation Feasibility . . . . . . . . . 16 f. Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 r rr rr ow W imw %W V ii ri WW WW LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit No. Title 1 Excerpt from CRR Committee Report of September 26, 1991 2 List of Districts -Wide Water Conservation Programs 3 Basis for Sanitation Districts Water Conservation 1991-92 Industrial User Rates by District 4 The Regional Urban Water Management Plan for the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California 5 Summary of Joint Operating Costs by Treatment Unit Process 6 1991-92 Industrial User Rates by District 7 Calculation of O&M Dollar Savings for Anaheim/MWD/Districts ULF Toilet and LF Showerhead Retrofit Project 8 Calculation of Capital Dollar Savings for Anaheim/MWD/Districts ULF Toilet and LF Showerhead Retrofit Project 9 Estimate of Water Conservation Flows for Districts -Wide Retrofit Project 10 Estimate of Costs to Implement a Districts -Wide Retrofit Project 11 Estimate of O&M Dollar Savings for Districts -Wide Retrofit Project 12 Estimate of Capital Dollar Savings for Districts - Wide Retrofit Project iii r LIST OF APPENDICES W Appendix No. Title A City of Anaheim Staff Report on Proposal for Funding to the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County - Ultra Low -Flush Toilet Program, July 1991 B Consumer Reports, How To Save Water - Performance Report on Low -Flush Toilets, July 1990. C Consumer Reports, How to Save Water - Performance Report on Low -Flow Shower Heads, July 1990 .r D Fiscal Year 1991-92, Budget Excerpt, Capital Outlay Revolving Fund, Classification of r, Budgeted Projects by Revenue Program Categories rr iv rr WW J November 14, 1991 Wo STAFF REPORT ULF TOILET AND LF SHOWERHEAD RETROFIT PROJECTS BACKGROUND "W a. Introduction and Overview At the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse (CRR) Committee meeting of September 26, 1991 and the Joint Board meeting of October 9, 1991, the Directors considered the Phase II - Anaheim/MWD/CSDOC Ultra Low Flush (ULF) Toilet and Low Flow (LF) Showerhead Retrofit Project (Phase II Retrofit). The Committee recommended the Phase II Retrofit project for the Boards consideration. The Boards of Directors referred the Phase II Retrofit project back to the Committee for additional analysis �-+ and consideration of the impact of this proposal as a Districts - wide effort. The report of the Committee to the Boards of Directors for the meeting of September 26, 1991 is not repeated here but is provided as Exhibit 1 of this report. The Directors requested additional information to completely understand the water and monetary savings summarized in the Committee report. Also provided to the Committee is the City of Anaheim's proposal to the Districts for the Ultra Low -Flush Toilet Program (Appendix A) . b. Legislative, Regulatory and Local Interactions State Legislative and Regulatory Status During the preparation of the staff report, information was `d obtained on the status of legislation, regulations and local agency water conservation efforts. This information is important as the Districts consider the factors that affect water conservation policy decisions. New Construction Requirements - ULF Toilets - At the state legislative level, existing legislation requires that all new buildings (including residences) constructed after January 1, 1992 "shall use water closets and associated flushometer valves which use no more than 1.6 gallons per flush and which meet performance standards established by the American National Standards Institute Standard A112.19.2" (ANSI). This law was enacted through the approval of Assembly Bill 2355 (AB 2355), introduced by Assembly Member Filante. AB 2355 was signed -1- rr W Staff Report ULF Toilet and LF Showerhead Retrofit Projects v November 14, 1991 L September 29, 1989 and became Chapter 1029 to amend Section 17821.3 of the Health and safety Code, relating to building I standards. The bill also L specified that this act constituted a state -mandated local program and make violations of these provisions a crime. ,, New Construction Requirements - LF Showerheads and Faucets - Previous to this act, the law required that after January 1, 1983, all new buildings constructed in the state contain water !' conserving water closets, as defined by ANSI standards, using a L maximum average of 3.5 gallons per flush. In addition, the law required the California Energy Commission to prescribe standards to promote use of energy efficient appliances, including faucets L and showerheads. The Energy Commission recently adopted regulations under Title 24 of the California Administrative Code prohibiting the use of faucets and showerheads at a flow rate L` that exceeds 2.5 gallons per minute (gpm) in new construction including residences. Replacement of Fixtures in Existing Buildings - More recently on March 8, 1990, Senator Killea of San Diego introduced Senate Bill 1224 (SB-1224). The provisions of the bill require the replacement of inefficient toilets, showerheads, and faucets 1 V before resale of a property. Presently the bill is in the Senate inactive file, which means it's a two-year bill. It may be resurrected at any time until December 31, 1992. If'during this j time the bill is not adopted or vetoed, it will automatically die u at the end of the session. If adopted, SB-1224 would commence January 1, 1993. At the LW time the bill would require all sellers of "residential, commercial, or industrial property" that use water in "showers, lavatory and sink faucets, urinals, residential reverse osmosis L systems, or water closets" to install water conservation devices prior to transfer of title. The transferor (seller) must provide to the transferee (buyer) a written statement that the conservation devices are installed as specified with the Real L Estate Transfer Disclosure Statement. Penalties for failure to comply with these provisions could cost the seller up to $500 for each water closet.and $50 for each of the other fixtures. L, Jonas Minton, Chief of the Water Conservation Office of the Department of Water Resources believes that implementation of SB- 1224 would result in a significant reduction in water demand and sewage flow. Bill Jacoby of the San Diego County Water Authority also believes that the retrofitting of older buildings would result in major water savings and sewer load reductions -2- 4 I L how Staff Report ULF Toilet and LF Showerhead Retrofit Projects November 14, 1991 statewide. He further maintains that "savings throughout the state from the implementation of SB-1224 is expected to be at kind least 420,000 acre-feet per year based on toilet replacement alone". The San Diego County Water Authority approximated the cost of replacing a toilet at $100-250, with installation at $40-100. Studies of the Department of Water Resources estimate that a typical family of three in a two -bath house would pay $2.75 more a month in mortgage payments due to the conservation retrofitting. However, the study also shows that the family would save at least $3.25 a month in water, sewer, and water heating bills due to the increased efficiency of the appliances. Major opposition to the bill comes from the Building Owners and Managers Association of California, the California Realty .� Association. They argue that the bill will have a negative effect on housing sales by increasing the closing costs due to retrofit. They believe that even a $500 increase in closing ,r costs would keep many people with low and moderate incomes from buying a home. There are also arguments that resale of homes as the impetus for retrofitting, is not the most cost-effective way to achieve conservation. Local Water Conservation Programs A number of water conservation programs are underway throughout Southern California. The most extensive is the Water Conservation Credits Program (WCC) sponsored.by the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD). Through this program, MWD has offered to pay up to 50% of the implementation costs for substantial plumbing retrofit projects like ULF toilets and LF showerheads. Ten significant ULF toilet programs were funded by MWD. They include programs with the Central and West Basin Municipal ...a Water Districts, the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, the City of Santa Monica (needed to reduce sewage to the Hyperion Treatment Plant), the San Diego area (needed as a consent decree to reduce sewer flow to the Point Loma Treatment Plant), the City of Pasadena, the City of Glendale and the Foothill Municipal Water District. All of these programs together will result in more than 300,000 toilet retrofits. -3- bw WW Staff Report U ULF Toilet and LF Showerhead Retrofit Projects November 14, 1991 MWD's future support of water conservation retrofit projects may be curtailed. MWD is reviewing and revising its budget priorities in the face of concern over proposed steep water rate increases. At this time, future water conservation credits are on hold pending clear policy guidelines from the MWD Board of Directors. MWD will continue to fund all projects that have been approved including the City of Anaheim proposal. The MWD Board is expected to indicate clearer policy direction on this issue at its November 19 meeting. An update on the results of that Board meeting will be provided at the CRR Committee Meeting. In Orange County and within the Districts' service area, there is some type of water conservation program underway in the 23 cities that contribute sewage to the Districts. Exhibit 2 summarizes these programs. Every city has a policy of distributing the free MWD conservation kits that do not include showerheads while nine cities distribute the more costly kits that include showerheads. None of the cities in the Districts' service area have ULF toilet retrofit projects other than the City of Anaheim proposal. In addition to surveying the Orange County cities, staff consulted with the Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC) regarding their water conservation efforts. In Orange County, MWDOC is the major wholesaler of imported water supplied by MWD. MWDOC endorses area -wide water conservation and has adopted the Memorandum of Understanding for Urban Water Conservation (MOU). For local retailer water conservation, MWDOC assists in the planning effort and functions as a conduit for MWD's conservation credits program. MWDOC does not contribute funds for the purpose of any plumbing retrofit. C. Summary of Districts' 112020 VISION" Master Plan Public Comment on Water Conservation Reactions from the public were compiled during the 112020 L VISION" Action Plan community outreach process, as part of the development of the Districts' 30 Year Master Plan. Comments ranged from expressing a desire to have the Districts incorporate water conservation and reclamation into their overall wastewater L management program to working on redesign of low flow plumbing fixtures. The workshops and focus groups were effective in surfacing the range and intensity of issues among the public. One of the specific comments reported in the Summary Analysis, Action Plan Focus Group II on Updated Wastewater Management Alternatives and Impacts dated April, 1989, included the fl installation of low -flush toilets and low -flow showerheads as a Staff Report `W ULF Toilet and LF Showerhead Retrofit Projects November 14, 1991 useful technology to reduce sewer flow. The water conservation goals embodied in the 112020 VISION" Action Plan and the formation of the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse division was partly in response to the public's interest in water conservation. Also as a part of the Districts' public education program, '-° that includes treatment plant tours and community presentations, there has been substantially increased interest from the public in accomplishing water conservation and water reclamation. ftd Phase II: Anaheim/MWD/CSDOC ULF Toilet and Showerhead Retrofit Project a. Basis for the Districts' Water Conservation Flows Residential Toilets The sewage flows projected to be saved by implementing the proposed Phase II Retrofit Project were calculated using source data from the MWD, the State Department of Water Resources (DWR) the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the City of Anaheim. Portions of these reports were based on United States census data. Exhibit 3 presents the calculated basis for the Districts' conserved sewage flows. The calculated sewage flow savings were developed using a Mel series of assumptions from the source references. For toilets, we first assumed that an average standard toilet uses six gallons of water per flush. There is variability in this value and according to industry judgements, ranges between five and seven gallons per flush. This variability is mostly a function of toilet design and system water pressure. The Districts have received public comment that some of the toilets that could be replaced in this program may be the low - flow versions that use an average of 3.5 gallons per flush. ••� These type of toilets have been required in new construction since January 1, 1980. It is possible that some replaced toilets could be of this vintage although staff estimates the number is likely to be a small share of the total. As well, staff recognizes that the 3.5 gallon per flush (LF toilets) have design inefficiencies that often require a second and occasionally a third flush to clear the bowl. Given this observation, it is wow third that this concern is insignificant in its potential impact on the Anaheim proposal. This point may have more relevance to the Districts -wide project and will be discussed more fully in that later section of this staff report. M= Staff Report L ULF Toilet and LF Showerhead Retrofit Projects November 14, 1991 Based on these assumptions, it was calculated that the flow difference between a standard toilet and ULF toilet was 4.4 gallons per flush (the difference between 6.0 and 1.6 gallons per flush) . The next significant assumption was the number of people per household. From the U.S. Department of Commerce Statistical. Abstract for 1985, it was determined that in Southern California there were an average of 2.7 people per household. In this evaluation, the final important assumption related to the number of flushes per person per day. From the HUD Summary Report on Residential Water Consumption, completed in 1984, it was determined that this value equalled four flushes per person per day. Using this value in combination with the other assumptions developed previously, the daily household sewage savings was calculated to equal 47.5 gallons. For this proposal, the City of Anaheim recommended using 50 gallons per household per day, a difference of 5% from the calculated value. These assumptions are consistent with values used by MWD in its Conservation Credits program. The Districts have received public comment that the value of four flushes per person per day and 50 gallons per household per day could be excessive. At this time, the question of the number of flushes per day is one of speculation as no other studies of this statistic are available. Nevertheless the value appears reasonable. In using the HUD studies the Districts are using the best available information. Regarding the matter of gallons saved per household per day, studies are underway by MWD associated with the toilet retrofit projects listed earlier. Results are expected early next year that will help validate water and -sewage savings. The Districts received a public comment that based on MWD's Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) the household savings may be excessive. An excerpt from MWD,1s 1990 UWMP is provided as 6W Exhibit 4. In Chapter VIII - Expansion of Conservation Program, page 154, it was noted that from a Phoenix, Arizona study of a pilot toilet rebate program, the average water savings was 10.8 L gallons per day per person. Using the Districts, population data of 2.7 people per household, the calculated average savings would equal 29 gallons per household per day, approximately 42% less than the amount used in this evaluation. -6- L wei Staff Report `` ULF Toilet and LF Showerhead Retrofit Projects November 14, 1991 VJW Based on staff's detailed review of the Phoenix study, it appears to be a case of "apples to oranges" comparison. The Phoenix study focused on the performance, installation and public acceptance of installing ultra low volume toilets (ULV) that use 0.8 gallons per flush versus 3.5 gallons per flush toilet. The City of Phoenix has required the use of 3.5 gallons or less per flush toilets since 1980. Given the study's focus where the, difference in water flows is only 2.7 gallons per flush (rather than the 4.4 gallons per flush for the Anaheim proposal), it �.r makes sense that the MWD UWMP reference value is 42% less than the Districts and Anaheim values. The percent difference between 2.7 and 4.4 gallons per flush is 39%, almost a direct match to the 42%. Other results from the Phoenix study are valuable to the Districts. -The conclusion of this report was that in-house performance of the ULV toilets was equal to or better than the conventional toilets. Wastewater flows were substantially lower than overall water consumption over the equivalent time period. Also, the wastewater composition in the study area was within the range typically reported for municipal wastewater. The waste flushing and transport through the household plumbing system, building sewers and sewer mains where ULV toilets were used was as satisfactory as where conventional toilets were used. Public acceptance of the toilets was positive. The study found water saved and reduced sewer flows per person per day in a household was in the range of 8.6 to 15.2 gallons, with an average of 10.8 gallons per day per person in a household. From the study's collected data there was an average of 3.9 persons per household. .r Overall, staff concludes that the assumptions for toilet - savings in Exhibit 3 are valid, are based on the best available information and are reasonable for use by the Districts. The tow total sewage savings estimated equals 73 millon gallons per year for toilets. This was computed using 50 gallons per household per day for 4,000 households for 365 days per year. Mai Residential Showerheads The calculated sewage savings for residential showerheads are also detailed in Exhibit 3. From the exhibit several assumptions were used to estimate the flow savings. These assumptions were derived from HUD studies, the City of Anaheim Now and MWD. r -7- ud MW Staff Report ULF Toilet and LF Showerhead Retrofit Projects November 14, 1991 I The first assumption was to use the lowest end of the range for average standard showerheads. HUD notes that typical showerheads use between 5 and 8 gallons of water per minute. For these estimates the water savings were based on the 5 gpm value. This is conservative by about 23% compared to the average water savings value of 6.5 gpm. For LF showerheads it was assumed that they would operate at 2.5 gpm. This is conservative by as much as 24% when comparing the average performance of LF showerheads as shown in Consumer Reports. For the 16 top rated LF showerheads the average flow rate was 1.9 gpm. The next assumptions dealt with the number and length of showers each day in each household. Again the assumed values were rather conservative in that we used only 1 shower per day per household with an average length of 8 minutes per shower. These may seem infrequent and short but they are believed to be representative of people's behavior during heightened drought awareness and conservation consciousness. Combining the assumption values together, the calculated daily sewage savings equalled 20 gallons per household. The total sewage savings estimated equals'29.2 million gallons per year. This was computed using 20 gallons per household per day for 4,000 households for 365 days per year. Combined Residential Flow Reduction - ULFTs and LF Fixtures In combining the residential ULF toilet and LF showerhead values, the total sewage savings was estimated to equal 102.2 ! million gallons per year. This equals 0.28 mgd. L Hotel/Motel Toilets and Showerheads The sewage flows projected to be saved by retrofitting hotels and motels were estimated similarly but not identical to the residential estimates. It was estimated by the City of Anaheim that because hotels have a maintenance and remodeling 1.•+ program, the average standard toilet flush would equal 5.7 gallons. This is 5% less than the residential average flow. Replacing the standard toilets with the ULF toilets at 1.6 ` gallons per flush will result in a savings of 4.1 gallons per flush. Hotel rooms are fitted with one toilet per room. The frequency of flushes on the days the room was occupied was !' estimated to equal 5.5. This includes daily cleaning service. -8- L how woo Staff Report ULF Toilet and LF Showerhead Retrofit Projects November 14, 1991 The City estimated the-hotel/motel occupancy rate to equal 75% or 275 days per year. Using these assumptions, the daily hotel/motel sewage savings was calculated to equal 22.5 gallons per room. For LF Showerheads, the City of Anaheim proposed assumptions identical to those used in the residential model. These values, noted in Exhibit 3, equal 20 gallons per room per day occupied. The total sewage savings estimated for ULF toilets and LF showerheads in hotels and motels equalled 6.2 million gallons per year and 5.5 million gallons per year, respectively. These .w values equal a sum of 11.7 million gallons per year or 0.03 mgd. Combined Hotel & Motel Flow Reductions - ULFTs and LF Fixtures The combined residential and hotel/motel sewage savings was 113.9 million gallons per year or 0.31 mgd. .r b. Performance of ULF Toilets The effective, reliable performance of ULF toilets has been tow demonstrated by their installation and acceptance in many cities in California over the past several years. The City of Santa Monica installed over 20,000 ULT toilets beginning in 1988 with no performance problems reported to date. The City of Goleta and the City of Santa Barbara installed over 12,000 ULF toilets in an aggressive rebate/retrofit water conservation program that began in 1988. Although collection system and treatment plant difficulties have occurred, they have reported no problems associated with the ULF toilets. "r As of January 1, 1992, California State Law will require all new construction in the State of California to install only ULF toilets that use 1.6 gallons per flush or less. The performance of these ULF toilets meets and exceeds the ANSI testing requirements. The ULF toilet has-been redesigned to perform while using less water. The old convention toilet that uses 5 to 7 gallons per flush, works on the principal of gravity by releasing water from a tank to the bowl and the water in'the bowl is released to the drain line by swirling around the bowl. -9- r.r Staff Report ULF Toilet and LF Showerhead Retrofit Projects November 14, 1991 The ULF toilets use compressed air ina sealed tank. When the knob on top of the toilet is depressed, the air tank forces the water out of the bowl. There is also a siphon jet at the bottom of the bowl to help the flushing action. It works similar to toilets on boats or airplanes. Due to the greater amount of energy than in conventional toilets, the ULF toilet is more effective in what is known as "line carry." The term is used to reflect the ability of the household sewer to carry solids from the toilet through the house drain to the street sewer. This "line carry" effectiveness eliminates sewer blockages from lack of flow and eliminates the need to flush twice. A July 1990 Consumer Report study evaluated low flush toilets concluding their top five toilets were very good. Appendix B provides the study. C. Performance of LF Showerheads The effective, reliable performance of low flow showerheads has been successfully demonstrated in many Southern California cities. Using results of a Consumer Reports study it was found that 16 received high marks and were highly recommended. The average flow rate for these 16 showerheads was 1.9 gpm. At 50 pounds per square inch (PSI) pressure, this average flow rate is 24 percent less than the assumed flow rate used to develop water savings. The Consumer Reports study is provided in Appendix C. d. Basis for Operation and Maintenance Savings As was reported previously to the Committee and Board of Directors, the Operation and Maintenance (O&M) savings to the Districts resulting from the proposed retrofit project were substantial. These savings were derived from combining the estimated saved flow with the Districts' known costs of O&M. The Districts' costs of O&M derive from a revenue program adopted in 1979 in accordance with EPA and the State Water Resources Control Board guidelines to allocate the costs of operations and maintenance of a sewage treatment plant to its users. A comprehensive cost accounting system was enacted that accumulates the cost of operations and maintenance by unit process. The revenue program allocates the cost per unit process to flow, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and suspended solids (SS). For example, all of the collection system O&M costs are -10- J Ma Staff Report ULF Toilet and LF Showerhead Retrofit Projects November 14, 1991 ar allocated to flow, as well as all the metering and diversion structures. and headworks. Secondary treatment O&M costs, as an example, allocate very little to flow and are mostly allocated to BOD and SS. From the cost accounting system, the Districts' Finance Department has determined the costs to treat the flow to the. treatment plant which varies by district. Exhibit 5 illustrates a summary of joint operating costs split into the various categories in the treatment process. From this summary one notes that depreciation expenses for the cost of capital structures and equipment has been subtracted to arrive at only the total O&M costs. It can also be seen that the portion of O&M costs attributed to flow management (and therefore directly related to - water conservation savings) is 17.8% of the total costs. This factor may vary over time as the character of sewage changes and the nature of the Districts' treatment facilities change. The flow related O&M costs identified in Exhibit 5 were then ,..� used to establish published Districts' user rates.. The industrial user rates for flow by District can be found in -- Exhibit 6. As can be seen in this table under Class I and II Fees, there are the three components of flow, SS and BOD. These fees were translated from a total budget value to dollars per _ million gallons of flow, a value needed to compute the water conservation savings. For the proposed Anaheim project, staff determined that the .project area fell within Districts 2 and 3. For this project, „r the average of the two flow rate numbers was used. Thus, the average of $206.94 per million gallons and $265.28 per million gallons equals $236.11 per million gallons of flow. With the amount of water saved and the unit value of O&M services, we were able to determine the net benefit to the Districts by investing in this project. To achieve an equal comparison basis, we employed the principle of present value. This principle converts a cash flow stream or savings over time into a single amount of money in•today's dollars reflecting a chosen interest rate. Exhibit 7 sets forth the calculations used to determine the O&M benefit to the Districts as a result of the proposed Anaheim retrofit project. These calculations were based on an interest _ rate of 6%. For toilets it was conservatively estimated their WMI -11- WW WW Staff Report ULF Toilet and LF Showerhead Retrofit Projects November 14, 1991 useful life would equal 10 years. This may be as much as 50% less than actual useful life. For showerheads it was conservatively estimated their useful life would equal five years. This assumption may also be 50% conservative. The annual O&M savings for ULF toilets was calculated to equal $18,700 per year with a present value of $137,633. The annual O&M savings for LF showerheads was calculated to equal $8,200 per year with a present value of $34,512. The total present value savings for O&M equalled $172,145. The September 26 CRR Committee Report used $172,000. e. Basis for Capital Savings The basis for the Districts capital fund savings was derived primarily from the Districts 30-year Master Plan budget estimates. The capital outlay portion of the Districts' 1991-92 Budget is provided in Appendix D. The capital outlay schedule sets forth a list of 117 construction projects that need to be implemented over the next 30 years. These projects have been apportioned into three categories: 1.. Replacement and Reconstruction 2. Improved Treatment 3. Additional Capacity The Districts, engineers have evaluated the projects and identified percentage allocations between each of these categories. Conservation savings were assumed to accrue only in the additional capacity category. This is a conservative assumption as it may be possible in the future to avoid building some secondary treatment that typically is categorized in the improved treatment list. The project list is further split into projects by type of process. It•was assumed that conservation savings would accrue only to projects that are primarily hydraulic in nature. These would include headworks, pump stations, pipelines, primary clarifiers, power systems and related equipment. From the capital outlay schedule, 27 projects were identified relating directly to flows and therefore water conservation. This was 23% of the total number of projects. The -12- d.d low WW Wei "0 Staff Report ULF Toilet and LF Showerhead Retrofit Projects November 14, 1991 value of these projects was conservatively estimated to equal $235.6 million of a total construction estimate of $699 million in 1989 dollars. This equals 34% of the total capital budget. To use these values effectively, the capital costs must be converted into a unit cost of service, such as dollars per million gallons of capacity. This calculation is noted in Exhibit 8. The treatment plant capacity relating to these capital costs is 399 mgd. Compared to the 1990-91 flows of 234 mgd the difference is 165 mgd. When the 165 mgd is divided into $235.6 million, one obtains a value of $1.43 per gallon per day capacity. This is the unit cost of service for capital associated with water conservation. From the flow estimates generated previously in this report, the calculated savings for capital associated with the Anaheim ULF toilet and LF showerhead project was $442,642. For the study purposes this was rounded to $445,000. The Districts have received public comment that the capital savings credit suggested for this project should be depreciated over time rather than adopted as a one-time savings. The commentor's conclusion from analyzing the difference between the `r two approaches could be that a one-time savings is too liberal. In considering this comment, it seems appropriate to review �+ the fundamental concepts associated with depreciation of assets and present worth of assets. One definition of depreciation could be "lessening in value of a physical asset with the passage r, of time". This could take the form of physical or functional depreciation. Physical is the wearing out of an asset, while functional implies the asset can no longer serve its intended purpose (i.e., unable to meet the demand for service). Using this definition of depreciation and analyzing the definition's terms, one realizes that the depreciation model is applicable when a "physical asset" exists; or when comparing alternative programs each of which would involve the construction of physical assets. If, as in the water conservation case, one is able to totally avoid the construction of a physical asset, then the depreciation concept no longer is applicable. A properly discounted present worth model does fit these circumstances. -13- Staff Report ULF Toilet and LF Showerhead Retrofit Projects November 14, 1991 In this instance, the Districts cost of future facilities is documented in the Districts' Master Plan and annual budget in current dollars versus discounted future dollars that would be needed at the time of construction. This means that for each avoided project the present value is already calculated. To apply another present value or depreciation model to these values would result in unfair double discounting. During the September CRR Committee Meeting, an observation i was made that these capital savings may be only theoretical. 6W This observation could be true if the Districts were to stop its conservation efforts at this project or only a few more projects. The capital savings become realistic when they reach a total flow savings of 6 mgd or more. The 6 mgd value is the size increment relating to construction of modules of capacity. In other words, to realize the capital savings as avoided construction, the Districts need to continue implementing projects similar to the Anaheim proposal until 20 have been implemented. At that time, the capital savings would equal about $8.6 million while the conservation outlay would equal about $6.3 million, a difference of $2.3 million, not counting O&M savings. If O&M savings are considered, the O&M savings would equal $3.4 million for a total savings of $5.7 million. f. 'Conclusions 11 Based on the detailed staff report provided, staff concludes that the basis for estimating the Districts' conserved sewage, O&M savings and capital savings as reported in the CRR Committee i Report of September 26, 1991 are valid, are based on the best available information and are reasonable for use by the Districts. DISTRICTS -WIDE IMPLEMENTATION OF RETROFIT PROGRAM At the Joint Board meeting of October 9, 1991, the Directors asked staff to evaluate and report back to the Boards on the impact of applying the ULF toilet and LF showerhead retrofit program such as that proposed by the City of Anaheim throughout the Districts' service area. This section of the Staff Report L estimates the impact of such a proposal using the Anaheim proposal as a model. -14- j i ad Staff Report ULF Toilet and LF Showerhead Retrofit Projects November 14, 1991 a. Estimate of Districts' Water Conservation Flows The sewage flows estimated to be saved by implementing toilet and showerhead retrofits Districts -wide can be calculated - using the City of Anaheim proposal as a model, while making' adjustments for existing households with newer 3.5 gallons per two flush toilets. Exhibit 9 shows the details of the sewage savings calculation. There were several important assumptions used in this estimate. First, the Districts used 828,875 equivalent dwelling units in the service area. It is recognized that there exists up to 80,000 commercial and industrial outlets in the District r service area that may have a higher water conservation contribution than residential households. However, because of time constraints and the difficulty in assessing this water w+ conservation value, it was conservatively assumed all service connections were households. Another important factor affecting the estimated conservation flows is the number of households constructed after 1980. These homes were subject to new state law requiring installation of 3.5 gallon per flush toilets.. From data available in the Orange County Progress Report, staff determined that approximately 30% of the service area equivalent dwelling units were constructed after 1980. The total number of r+ households was estimated to equal 245,638. For this calculation it was conservatively assumed that all of the 3.5 gallon per flush toilets operated effectively and required only one flush to clear the bowl. No scientifically based data exists to validate this assumption, although, as previously pointed out, -- considerable anecdotal information indicates that these toilets often need 2 or 3 flushes to clear the bowl. _ From these key assumptions, it was determined that the calculated total sewage savings from pre-1980 households would r.+ equal 52.5 mgd while post-1980 households the savings would equal 9.9 mgd. The conservative estimated total savings equalled 62.4 mgd. (Total current Districts flows are 225 mgd.) wr b. Estimate of the Costs to Implement The costs of implementing a Districts -wide water conservation retrofit project were estimated using the Anaheim _ project as a model. Exhibit 10 shows the estimated total cost equal to $198 million. Using the cost sharing ratios as discussed in the September 26 CRR Committee Report, the bulk of -15- rr 1 L Staff Report ULF Toilet and LF Showerhead Retrofit Projects November 14, 1991 the costs, 42% would be borne by MWD. This would total $83.2 million. The cities in the Districts' service area would split $57.4 million according to population by city. This would be 29% of the total. The remaining 29% would be borne by the Districts at a cost of $57.4 million. C. Estimate of the O&M Savings The O&M savings for a Districts -wide water conservation retrofit project were estimated in a manner similar to the Anaheim proposal. The Districts -wide average flow -related user rate equals $269.40 per million gallons. Exhibit 11 shows the basis for these O&M savings. As noted previously, the O&M savings were -conservatively estimated using 10 and 5 year lives for toilets and showerheads, respectively. The total present value savings of O&M was calculated to equal $31.7 million. The total annual savings was estimated to equal $5.0 million. d. Estimate of Capital Savings The capital savings for a Districts -wide water conservation i! retrofit project were estimated in a manner similar to the Anaheim proposal. Exhibit 12 notes that the projected total capital savings would equal $89 million. j As discussed in a previous section of this report, the Districts construct many.facilities in increments of 6 mgd. With (; a projected total water savings of 62.4 mgd, the Districts could L, avoid constructing between 10 and 11 treatment modules. e. Implementation Feasibility The implications of undertaking a large scale plumbing retrofit project throughout the Districts' service area are potentially enormous, from both a cost of implementation and operating/capital savings standpoint, as well as water conservation itself. If such a project were implemented it would seem to make sense to spread its implementation over 5 to 10 years so that the limited resources of cities, the Districts, MWD and others could be most efficiently maximized. From discussions with members of the Water -Energy Partnership (MWD, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, Southern California Edison and Southern California Gas Company plus several cities), it may be feasible to share the costs of -16- { , L, WO Staff Report " ULF Toilet and LF Showerhead Retrofit Projects November 14, 1991 a.d such a massive retrofit project over a number of entities including the energy utility industry. This concept is very preliminary in nature and has not yet been explored with the Partnership members at -large. It is evident considerable coordination would need to occur ''•' with the 23 cities and numerous water and sanitation agencies existing in the Districts service area. Building consensus and agreement on implementation methods as well as budgeted costs in relation to savings may well require some time to achieve. The status of SB-1224 could have an important effect on the implementation scheme. It is by no means clear that SB-1224 will be passed by the legislature and signed by the governor in the - face of stiff opposition from the realty industry. f. Conclusions From the information available to staff, it appears several conclusions can be drawn. (1) A Districts -wide plumbing retrofit program could be implemented that could potentially save up to 62.4 mgd of sewage flow. (2) The costs to the Districts of implementing such a program would be $57.4 million over 5 to 10 years. The total projected savings to the Districts is estimated to be $120.7 million for 0&M plus capital. (3) The feasibility of implementing a Districts -wide program is challenging and is subject to such factors as MWD's continued commitment to funding water conservation programs, the commitment to such a _ water conservation program'by the cities and water retail agencies in the Districts service area, the r+ potential for a working relationship with the Water - Energy Partnership and the,adoption of legislation that would mandate plumbing retrofits. l __. ref #130522.rp -17- WW I Staff Report Water Conservation Programs October 18, 1991 Exhibit 1 Excerpt from CRR Committee Report of September 26, 1991 C. Phase II: AnaheimlMWD/CSDOC ULF Toilet and Showerhead Retrofit Project Staff provided the following report on the proposed project. Background This phase of the Districts' water conservation program initially was designed to retrofit 10% of the hotels and motels (1,700 rooms) within the City of Anaheim with Ultra Low -Flush toilets (ULFT) and Low -Flow showerheads (LFS) by offering financial incentives to property owners to install these water F saving devices. The program is a joint effort of the City of Anaheim, MWD and the Districts. In February staff reported to this committee that the total program cost was estimated to equal $318,200 and the Districts' share was estimated to be approximately $44,290. The original schedule and scope is L outlined in Exhibit 2. For several reasons the City of Anaheim staff has proposed expanding the toilet retrofit program to include the residential sector. First, the City's current water conservation programs have been heartily embraced by many residents and the Council. They see a great opportunity to capitalize on the positive momentum regarding water conservation. Second, the City foresees paying a $394 per -acre-foot surcharge to MWD if it exceeds its water allocation. So far the City has been successful in avoiding this surcharge. Third, the City has adopted the Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Urban Water Conservation in California (MOU). Management Practice #16 of the MOU states that signers shall implement a ULF toilet replacement program where cost-effective. The value of the MOU is as an important element of state-wide consensus building, as part of the Bay Delta water hearings which attempt to address the ongoing Northern California versus Southern California water debate. L Staff Report "r Water Conservation Programs October 18, 1991 FM - The expanded program proposed by the City would provide $100 rebate incentives for up to 4,000 households to install ULFT's and LFS' at an average of 1.7 per household. The hotel and motel retrofit incentives would be scaled back to 1,000 rooms. This change in scope significantly increases the Districts' share of the Phase II project participation from $44,290 to $315,471. The Districts' share of the proposed project would be 29% of the. total program cost. Through the MWD Conservation Credits program, MWD's share would be $456,100 and the City's share would be $315,478 as outlined in Exhibit 3. The Committee members will recall that a resident of the City, Mr. Knypstra, addressed the Boards at their September 11 meeting objecting to the proposed project. Enclosed is a copy of written comments submitted by Mr. Knypstra (lavender). Also enclosed is a copy of a letter _ (salmon) responding to Mr. Knypstra. Economic Analysis The key to the Districts' participation in any water conservation program is a determination of the return that the Districts will receive from their investment. The proposal will - reduce sewage flows by an estimated 310,000 gallons per day. Because of these reduced sewer flows the Districts will save money through operation and maintenance (O&M) costs directly related to the reduced gallonage requiring treatment. As well, construction of treatment facilities can be avoided which also +� saves capital funds for the Districts. The anticipated savings for the Districts would be as shown in Table 1 below. two .r -2- Staff Report Water Conservation Programs October 18, 1991 TABLE 1 Estimated Savings of Anaheim ULF Toilet and Showerhead Retrofit Project O&M Capital Total Cost to Net Savings Savings Savings Districts Savings to Districts Net $155,900 $400,000 $555,900 $269,990 $285,910 Residential Savings Net Hotel & $16,200 $45,000 $61,200 $45,481 $15,719 Motel Savings $172,100 $445,000 $617,100 1 $315,471 1 $301,629 The 0&M savings were calculated over 10 years of useful life for ULFT's and 5 years of useful life for ULFS' at an interest rate of 6%. The capital savings were calculated as a one-time savings. The above are the Districts' costs and savings only and do not reflect the City's costs or savings. A detailed summary it of the computations used to estimate these savings is provided in,,, Table 2. Shown in Table 3 are the overall project costs and proportionate shares by agency. l -3- r Staff Report Water Conservation Programs October. 18, 1991 TABLE 2 Detailed Computation of Sewage and Monitoring Savings Resulting from Proposed Anaheim Retrofit Program. DESCRIPTION SEWAGE DISTRICTS' SAVINGS SAVINGS IN MILLIONS OF GALLONS PER YEAR (MGY) Residential Residential Residential (4000 households) 73.0 MGY O&M $126,700 CAPITAL $286,000 TOTAL $412,700 6,800 ULFT 29.2 MGY $ 29,000 $114,000 $143,000 6,800 LFS Hotel/Motel Hotel/Motel Hotel/Motel O&M CAPITAL TOTAL 1,000 ULFT 6.2 MGY $ 10,800 $ 24,000 $ 34,800 1,000 LFS 5.5 MGY $ 5,000 $ 21,000 $ 26,500 TOTAL 113.9 MGY 0&M CAPITAL TOTAL $172,000 $445,000 $617,000 (.31 mgd) * Savings based on the following assumptions: 1) Toilets will save 4.1 gallons per flush. 2) Showerheads will save 10 gallons per shower based on savings of 2.6 gallons per minute and an average shower length of 4 minutes. 3) Useful life of toilets assumed 10 years and showerheads 5 years. 4) Districts' O&M costs including collection and treatment average $236.11 per million gallons. 5) Districts' capital costs for joint facilities maintaining current loads of treatment estimated to equal $235.6 million to treat an additional 165 million gallons (hydraulics and primary only) which equals $1.43 per gallon of capacity. -4- Staff Report Water Conservation Programs October 18, 1991 6) O&M savings computed as present value (PV) using PV factor of 4.2124 for a showerhead savings and a PV factor of 7.3601 for toilet savings. TABLE 3 Project Costs and Sharing Summary Agency Percent Share of Total Project Costs by Agency MWD Southern Calif 42% $ 456,100 City Anaheim 29% 315,478 CSDOC 29% 315,471 Totals 100% $1,087,049 Recommendation: After considerable discussion regarding the proposed projects' economics, the Committee recommends that Phase II of the ULF Toilet and Showerhead Retrofit Project be amended to include the residential sector in the program for a total sum not to exceed $315,471 as set forth in Exhibit 3; and that payment of said amount to the City of Anaheim be authorized. Director Dunlap requested that his vote in opposition to the recommendation be made a matter of record. Source: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee Report, September 16, 1991; ref #130503.rp -5- EXHIBIT 2 WATER CONSERVATION PHASE II - 10% HOTEL/MOTEL RETROFIT IN ANAHEIM County Sanitation Districts of Orange County ACTION CATEGORY SCHEDULE RESPONSIBILITIES COSTS VERIFICATION 10 percent hotel/motel retrofit program ULFT 12 1 90: CSDOC, Approximately 1,720 rooms Program representative to include all hotels and motels in the Phase II Meeting with CSDOC and City City of Anaheim, @. approx. $3.00 per will visit hotel/motel sites City of Anaheim. of Anaheim. & MWD ahowerhead and inspect the products 1 per room = S 5,160 installed and prepare a Approximately 150 hotels and motels. 12/1190 - 2/15/91: room -by -room inventory. Select lighting consultant & 100 ULFT Rebate Approximately 1,720 rooms lighting contractors, and 1 per room = $172,000 execute any necessary Offer retrofitting with $100 ULFT contracts. Anaheim will pay for the rebates, and free showerheads for 10% energy retrofit. of their rooms. 12/1/90 - 2115/91: Prepare list of qualified Cost Breakdown Program is a 6-month test program with contractors. Phase III to follow immediately. MWD 12 15 90: LFS $ 2,580 Complete the development of ULFT $ 88,000 all necessary computer models Total $ 88,580 to quantify water, sewer, lighting, air conditioning and Anaheim common area savings. LFS $ 1,290 ULFT $ 43,000 Complete the development of Energy $141,040 computer models to track Total $185,330 Phase If & III of program (i.e. date letter mailed to customer CSDOC and date customer responded). LFS $ 1,290 ULFT $ 43,000 1/15/91 - 2115/91: Total $ 44,290 Prepare and complete program announcements, program fact Total Program Cost $31�8 200 sheets, letter to customers, news releases, customer agreement forms, and Inventory forms. 1 28 91: Anaheim's start of showerhead project. No CSDOC contribution at this time. 6/1 /91: Anaheim's start of toilet rebate project. No CSDOC contribution at this time. 2 28 91: CSDOC's Conservation, Reclamation & Reuse (CRR) Committee's approval and recommendation to the Boards. 3 13 91: CSDOC Boards contribution. 12/1 /91. End of Phase 11. For additional information contact Carolyn Bruskin, CSDOC, @ (714) 962-2411 Ext. 3652 Revised 4/9/91 EXHIBIT 3 WATER CONSERVATION PHASE If - ULF TOILET RETROFIT IN ANAHEIM County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Phase II Page 1 of 2 ACTION CATEGORY SCHEDULE RESPONSIBILITIES COSTS VERIFICATION Residential: Retrofit a total of 6,800 toilets and ULFT 12_ /1/90: CSDOC, 6,800 toilets @ approx. Program representatives showerhedds in residential households Phase II Meeting with CSDOC and City City of Anaheim, $100.00 per toilet will visit retrofit sites of and 1,000 toilets and showerheads in of Anaheim. & MWD 1.7 per household $680,000 the hotels and motels and hotels and motels in the City of Anaheim inspect the products with Ultra Low -Flush toilets (ULFT) and 12/1/90 - 2/15/91: 6,800 showerheads installed and prepare a Low -Flow showerheads (LFS). Select lighting consultant & 1 per household = $35,700 room -by -room inventory. lighting contractors, and offer financial incentives in the way of execute any necessary Labor and Materials rebates to install ULFT's and LFS. contracts. Labor (Collection of Progam will offer as an addtional old toilets) _ $68,000 incentive, an economic and convenient 1211/90 - 2/15/91: means of disposing of customer's old Prepare list of qualified Labor (Customer toilets. contractors, contacts) = $80,000 Program is a 1 year project and is 12/15190: Materials = $50,099 dependent on customer reponse rate. It Complete the development of is anticipated the program will last 1 all necessary computer models Documentation and year and may be completed sooner. to quantify water, sewer, Measurement = $32,000 lighting, air conditioning and common area savings. TOTAL RESIDENTIAL COSTS: 1953,799 21590: Complete the development of Hotel/Motel: computer models to track 1,000 toilets @ approx. Phase II & III of program (i.e. $100 per toilet date letter mailed to customer 1 per room = $100,000 and date customer responded). 1,000 showerheads 1/15/91 - 2/15/91: 1 per room = $5,250 Prepare and complete program announcements, program fact Labor = $8,000 sheets, letter to customers, news releases, customer Documentation = $20,000 agreement forms, and inventory forme. TOTAL HOTEUMOTEL COSTS: $133,250 1 28 91: Anaheim's start of ahowerhead Cost breakdown project. No CSDOC contribution at this time. MWD $154/AF 2 2/ 8/91: Total $456,100 CSDOC's Conservation, Reclamation & Reuse (CRR) Anaheim Committee's approval and Total $315,478 recommendation to the Boards. CSDOC 3 13 91., Total $ 315,471 CSDOC Boards approval of program, contingent upon successful demonstration of TOTAL PROGRAM cost effectiveness. COSTS: $1 08 For additional information contact Carolyn Bruskin, CSDOC, @ (714) 962-2411 Ext: 3652 Revised 8/28/91 If t I f 1 r 1 1 1 F I It ► Ir 1 9 I I I 1 I I I__ I WATER CONSERVATION PHASE II - ULFT RETROFIT IN ANAHEIM County Sanitation Districts of Orange Countv Phase II Page 2 of 2 ACTION CATEGORY SCHEDULE RESPONSIBILITIES COSTS VERIFICATION 1 O/1 /91: Anaheim's start of ULF toilet program. 9 26 91: CSDOC CRR committee approval of scope change and funding. 10/9/91: CSDOC Boards approval of scope change and funding. 10/1 /92: End of Phase II. For additional information contact Carolyn Bruskin, CSDOC, @ (714) 962-2411 Ext. 3652 Revised 8/29/91 r. . 110 1 I I oZ 00-7 -% eAr o ,,c,vitiC . , ate /YY�¢�t'/►L� 3 ! 4:1 k LA4 . 3 -7 n�� Ca /� O 9 7,,D44' - 7 e-:.�f� add- a. 4- � _. 097; 044 . C-I PILTI rA W S -� 1 '71 C s tea- p � a-8� 194i � b4 c� csDoc� c�- G s D o O B'v .-o-kxP-4.0 3 1'511) 471 jj� cztt.�- -�� dCSILII 141 o C44, �,►.� ©�r�r� err a.ru a l 54�. f Ar- m w D t9$q-90. a.e� • � 5�� N � � i�r;i; �• m w D�maoPolar -rr4.0 w 04TMM DIS-i 14-IIIIr- CAL-, 1 '+► c.S D DC► Ce c� �►.1-rY Sa r Tj4 Tr o �► S j'rt r L T = O P-A A.AQ,�. G00&XrY wow Aso te a• Z 11 sq- g. 1 +14.0 1 si 11 re 57. SOD I2.&J,- 1-7, -7 i 1+. ! t -7 ZZ. 9 29� L -3'7. 4-D AL . ate .:wi.'i .• �.a.L✓ C-an't4t4,U-b �W • ti/K..Q.�✓iR�% •" D 4- 4.00611 Im 4:Ot. LVK,�t,1� ..- - t4 c.e�,►, a,,.�t....a.a- vim. � a� g. fie- 1 b .•i.e.a.a1 .rc�..� .�+Y�O.t�tJ 3 - Z No 3 L H CIF p 7z. 5 tow � n 4- 30-4� Ohlewe '71 °r7o � _�.e_ � M Ui 1 ,\ or, 'i AV `I ` y�rit��7rpk O O,q104 '11V CE C001 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714) 962-2411 September 23, 1991 Mr. Phillip Knypstra 2525 Gelid Avenue Anaheim, CA 92B06 Re: Water Conservation Programs Dear Mr. Knypstra: — Based on my perception of your written communications and discussions with several agencies, including the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts), pertaining to water issues, it appears that clarification of the Districts' position would be both appropriate and, hopefully, helpful. First, let me say that we clearly agree that water reclamation should be an important part of any water policy. As you may know, the Districts' wastewater management facilities master plan includes the construction of three new wastewater reclamation plants with a total added capacity of 48 million gallons per day. We are presently in the process of implementing that plan. An aggressive water conservation effort is also an important element of the Districts' wastewater management action plan. You have questioned why the Districts are interested in water conservation. Actually, the reason is fundamental to our mission. For the Districts, it makes sense from both a public policy water resource management perspective and from an economic standpoint. Through appropriate water conservation measures, the amount of wastewater that must be processed by our sewerage system is reduced. This means we avoid not only the capital costs of constructing new sewage collection, treatment and disposal facilities, but we reduce the attendant operations and maintenance costs as well. Determining what kind of water conservation measures are appropriate for the Districts to participate in depends on an economic analysis of the return on whatever investment is made by the Districts in the specific program under consideration. The Anaheim water conservation rebate program we are considering Is very similar to energy rebate programs of electrical and gas utilities which have proved so successful. Our analysis of the water conservation program proposed by the City of Anaheim (rebate program), which the Districts have been asked to participate in, indicates that the payback is, conservatively, two to one. In other words, for every dollar we contribute to the rebate program, we will save approximately $2.00 in capital construction, operation and maintenance costs. Further, the results are immediate. The program does not require the lengthy construction period for expensive infrastructure as does the supply side. In addition, the program has many other benefits such as reduced energy and chemical demand, to name a few. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRIC of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA Mr. Phillip Knypstra Re: Water Conservation Programs September 23, 1991 Page Two of Two 101344 ELLIS AVENUE PO BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272 (714) 962.2411 Concerning the apparent confusion over the status of the Districts' participa- tion in the Anaheim rebate program, it appears to be a case of semantics. As heretofore stated, it is the Districts' policy to aggressively pursue water conservation. Our staff has met with City of Anaheim staff and concluded, for the reasons mentioned above, that participation in the rebate program would be very beneficial to the Districts. Accordingly, our staff has advised the City that they will recommend to our Directors that the Districts participate in the program. That clearly does not yet constitute a commitment to participate by the Districts. Staff does not have that authority. Such a commitment to participate rests solely with the Board of Directors and they have not yet considered the matter. I hope this clarifies the Districts' proposed involvement in the Anaheim water conservation rebate program and the compelling reasons for that participation. Staff or I would be pleased to further discuss this matter with you if you so desire. no w rr rr( 6a 4' rr M r r.l w Exhibit 2. List of Districts -Wide Conservation Programs for Fiscal Year 1990-91. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California. z ON f— p w O >W UJUJ 3 Q _ CO w wCC c7 o K¢7 Cc a 3 Y p LijQ p H Z N CC a- 0 z 01-- U 0 z Q m>- (5 tr Q W N W Q cc W z0 c �Q az ¢� iu z_ p> aw �- 3� > 3w z% W U] 0w p pN zz W W� CITIES N o gQ 3 LL� ago R'D Wtn wz NOTES D 0> viw = LLY LLS CITY OF ANAHEIM HL 991-DRIP CITY OF BREA 990-7691 CITY OF BUENA PARK 521-9900 x246 CITY OF COSTA MESA (Mesa Consolidated Water District) 631-1205 CITY OF CYPRESS 229-6752 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY 965-4493 CITY OF FULLERTON HL 738-3177 CITY OF GARDEN GROVE 741-5396 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 536-5921 x2888 CITY OF IRVINE (Irvine Ranch Water District) HL 476-7650 CITY OF LA HABRA (213) 697-36% CITY OF LA PALMA 523-1140 CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS 527-2118 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HL 644-3DRY CITY OF ORANGE . 744-2233 CITY OF PLACENTIA . 528-1462 CITY OF SANTA ANA HL 565-4016 CITY OF SEAL BEACH (213) 431-2527 CITY OF STANTON 220-2220 CITY OF TUSTIN 573-3380 CITY OF VILLA PARK (Serrano Irrigation District) 538-0079 CITY OF WESTMINSTER 895-2876 CITY OF YORBA LINDA 777-3048 (Yorba Linda Water District) ' HL = HOTLINE REVISED 3/27/91 CAB xoC i" EXHIBIT 3 Basis for Sanitation Districts Water Conservation Flows Residential A. Assumption: 1. Toilets Average Standard Toilet (4) = 6 gallons flush Ultra Low Flow Toilet = 1.6 aallons flush Difference between standard and ULF Toilets = 4.4 gallons flush From Census Report Data (1) = 2.7 people HH From H.U.D. (3) and MWD (5) Studies = 4 flushes person/day Calculated Unit Savings: l.► 4.4 gallons x 2.7 people x 4 flushes = 47.5 gallons l� flush household person/day day/HH Use 50 gallons household/day L 2. Showerheads - Average Standard Showerhead(2) = 5-8 gallons minute Low Flow Showerhead(4) = 2.5 gallons 6j minute Difference between Standard = 2.5 gallons and Low Flow Showerhead minute Assumed by Anaheim (4) = 1 shower household/day L 1! 6" imi EXHIBIT 3 (cont) Average Shower Length(4) (6) = 8 minutes bow shower Calculated Unit Savings: 2.5 gallons x 1 shower x 8 minutes = 20 gallons minute household/day shower household/day B. Calculated Total Savings: WNW 1. Toilets - 50 gallons x 4,000 HH x 365 days = 73;000,000 gallons household/day year year 2. Showerheads - r 20 gallons x 4,000 HH x 365 days = 29,200,000 gallons household/day year year 3. Total Residential Calculated Water Savings Toilets = 73,000,000 gallons/year Showerheads = 29,200,000 gallons/year `oo Total = 102,200,000 gallons/year Conversion to Daily Flow = 280,000 gallons or .28 mad i1w day Hotel/Motel A. Assumptions: 1. Toilets - Average Standard Toilet (4) = 5.7 gallons +J Based on the fact that flush hotels replace toilets Ultra Low Flow Toilet = 1.6 gallons flush From City of Anaheim (4) = 1 toilet room From City of Anaheim (4) = 5.5 flushes WNW toilet/day EXHIBIT 3 (cont) U Calculated Unit Savings: 4.1 gallons x 1 toilet x 5.5 flushes = 22.5 gallons flush room toilet/day room/day From City of Anaheim, Occupancy Rate = 275 days year 2. Showerheads - Average Standard Showerheads (2) = 5-8 gallons minute Use 5 gallons minute Low Flow Showerhead = 2.5 gallons minute Difference between Standard and Low Flow Showerhead = 2.5 gallons minute From City of Anaheim (4) = 1 shower room/day Average Shower Length (4) (6) = 8 minutes showerheads/room Calculated Unit Savings: 2.5 gal x 1 showerhead x 8 minute = 20 gallons minute room/day showerhead/room room/day B. Calculated Total Water Savings 1. Toilets - 22.5 gal x 1,000 rooms x 275 days = 6,201,250 gal room/day year year 2. Showerheads - 20 gal x 1,000 rooms x 275 days = 5,500,000 gal room/day year year EXHIBIT 3 (cont) WW 3. Total Hotel/Motel Calculated Water Savings MW Toilets = 6,200,000 gallons/year Showerheads = 5.500.000 ctallons/year Total = 11,700,000 gallons/year Conversion to Daily Flow = 32,000 gallons or .032 mad day Total Project Water Savings tow 0.28 mcid + 0.032 mad = 0.31 mgd day rr taw List of References: 1. U.S.-Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Statistical Abstract of the United States; 1985, December 1984. 2. Department of Water Resources Water Plan Water Conservation r.r Assumptions, 1989. 3. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Summary Report on Residential Water Consumption Projects, June 1984. 4. City of Anaheim report to the Board, July 7, 1991. 5. The Regional Urban Water Management Plan for the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, November 1990. 6. verbal communication with Mr. Matt Puffer from Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, 1991. r WW �� NEW WW EXHIBIT 4 THE REGIONAL URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 1111 Sunset Blvd., P.O. Box 54153 Los Angeles, CA 90054 Richard W. Balcerzak Assistant General Manager Carl Boronkay General Manager Duane L. Georgeson Assistant General Manager Michael J. McGuire Assistant General Manager STATE WATER PROJECT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION Timothy H. Quinn Edward J. Thornhill Director Water Conservation Manager Mark S. Dymally Project Manager PLANNING DIVISION F. Wiley Home Director The Report was Prepared by: PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS, LTD. P.O. Box 1316 Carbondale, II, 62903 NOVEMBER 1990 L tmd as 10 gallons per day per employee. Metropoli- tan will assist local agencies in implementing governmental retrofits under the existing Con- servations Credits Program. Commercial Water Audits This best management practice involves on -site visits to large commercial users of water such as hotels, hospitals, laundries, car washes, and others. The purpose of each audit is to identify the water conservation potential at each site and offer technical assistance to im- plement conservation practices. Metropolitan will devise a financial incentives program de- signed specifically for this practice. Enforcement of New California Plumbing Code The newplumbing code will require that (in addition to low -flow showers)1.6 gallon/flush toilets are used in all new or remodeled build- ings constructed after 1992. Because water savings from this measure can be expected only if builders comply with the law, Metropolitan will assist its member agencies and subagencies in providing adequate enforcement of this state law. The goal of this best management practice is to achieve 95 percent or higher compliance with the requirements of the 1992 plumbing code. Metropolitan will work with member agencies and the city inspectors in their service area. Local water agencies could be provided with financial assistance to conduct inspections of new buildings. Metropolitan will dissemi- nate information about code requirements to all real estate developers and construction firms in Southern California and work toward the revision of American National Standards Insti- tute (ANSI) standards for the plumbing de- vices. POTENTIAL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES In addition to the eight present best man- agement practices, Metropolitan willcontinue to research ways for achieving further gains in water use efficiency. At present these new measures, referred to as potential best man- agement practices, include: (1) Conservation -oriented retail pricing practices (2) Toilet giveaway/rebate program (3) Industrial water audits (4) Xeriscape requirements for new con- struction (5) Efficient residential landscaping pro- grams Each of these potential practices is briefly dis- cussed below. Conservation -Oriented Retail Pricing Chapter VH describes Metropolitan's whole- sale pricing approach to achieve an efficient use of imported water supplies in Southern California. This best managementpractice will be designed to effect pricing practices at the retail level. Currently, Metropolitan is funding research on measuring the responsiveness of various user sectors to changes in the price of water. The most recent results of this research have been incorporated into the MWD-MAIN wa- ter use forecasting model in order to predict the impact of recent price increases as well as pro- 153 jected future prices on future water use. Addi- tional research will be funded in order to measure the impacts on water use of alternative designs of water rates. Metropolitan will disseminate the scientific findings of this research among _member agen- cies and their subagencies. The goal of this best management practice will be to influence the current rate -making practice in Southern Cali- fornia in order to introduce additional price incentives for water conservation. Toilet Giveaway/Rebate Program This best management practice is designed to promote voluntary installation of ultra -low - flow (ULF) toilet fixtures (1.6 gallons or less per flush) in all types of housing units. Because the use of these toilets in new construction will be mandatory in the near future, all existing homes in Southern California can achieve additional improvements in water use efficiency (including homes which already have toilets using 3.5 gallons per flush). The program will be implemented using two modes: (1) distribution of free toilets to customers who request them from their retail water agencies, and (2) provision of a rebate (e.g., $100) to customers who purchase and install the ULF toilet. The goal of this program is to achieve installation of 400,000 toilets by the year 2000 and an additional 400,000 by the year 2010. The potential household savings due to the installation of 1.6 gallon toilets are not well documented: The engineering estimates de- rived from reduced flushing volumes indicate that they may range from 8 to 16 gallons per day per each person in a household. The data collected in Phoenix (Anderson and Siegrist, 1989) indicate reductions ranging from 8.6 to 15.2 gallons with an average of 10.8 gallons per day per person. Industrial Water Audits An industrial water audit is a study of a facility's water use. The audit consists of the determination of water uses and water needs followed by recommended measures for reduc- ing the water uses. Industrial customers can have very differ- ent water requirements. The differences stem from the type of water uses at each site which may vary from sanitary to process use to evapo- rative cooling. Therefore, the auditors need to be trained so they can offer a variety of site - specific technical services. Water audits of large manufacturing plants can take one person between two and five days to complete, depending on the complexity of the site. The audits would be voluntary, and there is no data yet on. the participation rates that could be achieved if water agencies offer such a program. In order to conduct an audit program, the first step will be to compile a list of all possible sites and arrange them in terms of descending daily water use. The second step is to set criteria, which will be used to determine the percentage of the total sites to be audited, starting with the largest water users first. The criteria used in the determination of the per- centage is a function of cost-effectiveness. For example, if the payback period to implement the audit finding is found to be two years, it may be found that a minimum of 10,000 gpd per site would have to be saved. Thus, only those sites 154 [ I [ _ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ JOCOST91 JOINT OPERATING COSTS Bo 7/]1/91 BY REVENUE PROGRAM CATEGORY 12 MONTHS ENDED 6-30-91 TOTAL LESS TOTAL ALLOC W•O..x DESCRIPTION ADD'L W.O. CHGS DEPRECIATION M 6 O PARAM M.O.O TO 6-30-91 DO ----------- 71XX ------------------------ COLL 6 DIVERSION ------------ ------------- 501.544.90 -------------- 396.910.64 -------------------------- 194.634.14 9-1 7230C 214TUMLANT 107.479.37 1o6.681.41 797.04 8-1 01xx ROADWORKS a.707.069.91 1.250.7]].92 1.449.]]6.29 B-1 PRIMARY SUED Ep a OVER 2.651.024.64 626.754.21 2.024.270.43 E-2 :201.0.9 202 PRIMARY S80 STRUCT 0a17 1.380.550.13 1.194.452.09 109.097.24 B-3 8203.53.8.9 ACT SLUDGE 80 6. OVER 1.992.240.46 54.564.73 1.937.679.93 8-4 0204.54 ACT SLUDGE STRUCT 1.550.501.43 1.549.303.06 1.117.77 B-S 8205.53 SLUDGE THICKEH2NG EO 113.979.54 34.740.56 09.227.90 8-4 0206.56 SLUDGE THICKENING STR 40.689.22 37.574.74 3.110.40 B-5 8211-X.41 TRICKLING FILTER 20 0240 45.194.10 15.120.01 30.074.17 8-4 8242.12 TRICKLING FILTER STR 44.620.45 20.370.84 24.249.61 B-5 6213.51 SECONDARY BED 80 274.090.76 296.253.05 06.737.71 B-4 8214.52 SECONDARY BED STR ]].494.]] 29.136.69 4.359.64 8-5 0225.8.9 DIGESTION 80 &.CPER 2.821.130.00 a09.777.51 a.526.]5].29 8-6 8a16-X DIGESTION SIR 1.002.760.29 962.040.97 40.739.31 8-6 0221-6.61-6 BLOWER EQUIP 109.106.01 04.951.01 104.157.60 8-4 6220.6260 BLOWER STRUCTURES 49.402.64 49.293.93 300.71 8-5 8271-4 AERATION 80 6 OVER 0261-4.0291-9 379.910.20 29.053.09 340.654.31 8-4 0230.00.90 AERATION STRUCTURES 247.692.47 0.00 347.942.47 9-5 0270 OKVcmH PLANT STR 701.535.49 324.797.57 274.797.69 8-4 9a71-4.9 CXKWRH PLANT EQ O OVER 44.127.25 40.304.60 3.74a.s7 B-5 6299 GENERAL TRMT OVER 9291 307.07 0.00 207.07 a-7 83xx SOLIDS HANDLING-TRMT 4.209.704.32 2.023.097.74 2.174.606.50 8-6 8430C SOLIDS HAMDLING-DISP 5.121.753.17 1.065.42 5.119.947.35 a-$ 65xx EFFLUENT DISINFECTION 224.259.94 15.979.37 206.279.27 8-1 91xx EFFLUENT DISPOSAL 3.315.145.90 2.013.850.58 1.301.297.32 B-1 TOTAL ------------- -------------- 11.450.404.53 --------------- 19.597.629.20 SUPERVISORY CONTROL 1.959.973.05 8-0 UTILITY SYSTEMS 2.232.894.39 8-6 GENERAL PLANT CC44PLax 6.490.062.21 B-0 ODOR CONTROL 6 STUDIES 4.413.713.74 13-0 GENERAL ENGINEERING 1.035.223.96 33-0 INDUSTRIAL WASTE 946.592.13 8-8 LABS 6 RESEARCH 3.732.202.15 B-8 NET MOTOR POOL 315.976.89 B-8 ELECTRIC CARTS 152.263.00 33-8 PORTABLE ZQU2P 215.146.34• 11-6 TOTAL M L O 41.460.401.94 USE DEPR i GAL CHO WCRKSFQS USE M.O. SY ELEMENT REPORT ALLOC PARAM is CODE L------- FLOW a. am 20S B.O.D. TOTAL --- ------------------------ B-1 ------------ 100 ------------- 0 -------------- 0 too B-2 0 65 35 too B-] 35 45 20 so 0-4 O 40 60 too B-5 25 25 50 100 0-6 0 60 40 100 13-7 34 ]] ]] 100 SUBTOTAL % OF TOTAL B-8 USE is TO TOTAL FROM ABOVE TOTAL a. BOLiDS S.O.D. TOTAL 3.143.235 0 0 3.143.]]5 0 1.315:776 70s.a9s a.0a4.a7o 65.134 01.744 ]7.219 166.097 0 1.105.401 1.778.101 2.963.502 101.130 101.138 202.276 404.551 0 5.925.340 3.950.227 9.875.567 104 101 101 307 ].]09.711 8.611.499 6.676.ti9 16.597.629 ---..------ --------------------._-_-- .----------- 17 80% ♦6 ]07i ]s 90% 1D0 D01L 4.109.379 10.692.147 8.289.526 23.091.053 --------------- ------------------- ---- ----------- 7.419.091 19.303.646 14.965.945 41.686.682 ---------- ----- ----------- ----------------------- N C 3 KD� 3 m O a -n I 3 L. m 0 ZI z c� z_o 'O D O n z r" 0 (n En n 0 Kn -i Vf EXHIBIT 6 1991-92 INDUSTRIAL USER RATES Resolution Class I & II Fees Class III Fee Dist. No. Number Flow(*) S.S.(*) B.O.D.(*) Flow(*) 1 91-137-1 $205.49 $206.10 $162.25 $ 973.50. 2 91-138-2 206.94 186.20 146.58 900.79 3 91-139-3 265.28 185.04 145.67 954.82 5 91-140-5 297.30 196.42 154.63 1,029.24 6 91-141-6 167.11 165.67 130.42 784.44 7 91-142-7 339.87 187.21 147.38 1,037.49 11 91-143-11 278.33 173.46 136.56 924.72 13 91-144-13 400.94 131.30 103.36 890.21 14 91-145-14 263.32 118.03 92.92 703.15 *Flow - Per million gallons of flow *S.S. - Per thousand pounds of suspended solids *B.O.D. - Per thousand pounds of biochemical oxygen demand L WAW MW A. Assumptions WW EXHIBIT . 7 Calculation of O&M Dollar Savings 1. ULF Toilets V.W Useful life of toilet - 10 years Interest rate = 6% O&M Cost = $236.11 per million gallons WEI Present Value Factor = 7.3601 Sewage Saved = 79.2 million gallons per year 2. LF Showerheads - WW Useful life of showerhead = 5 years Interest rate = 6% O&M Cost = $236.11 per million gallons Present Value Factor = 4.2124 Sewage Saved = 34.7 million gallons per year B. Calculated O&M Dollar Savings Annual ULF Toilet 79.2 million gallons x $236.11 "" O&M Savings year million gallons 18 700 year Present Value of $18,700 x 7.3601 = $13.7,633 WW O&M Savings Toilets year Annual LF Showerhead = 34'.7 million gallons x 236.11 O&M Savings year million gallons = 8 200 year Present Value of 8 200 x 4.2124 = $34,512 wow O&M Savings LF year Showerheads Total Present Value O&M Savings = $172,145 low WW EXHIBIT 8 L Calculation of Capital Dollar Savings A. Assumptions 1. From Appendix D, 27 capital project items identified relating directly to flow and additional capacity through the year 2020. This was of a total of 117 projects (23% of total). The value of the "additional capacity" component for these 27 projects was $235.6 million of a total of $699 million. This equals 34% of the total capital budget. Typical types of projects include primary clarifiers, headworks, power systems, pump stations, pipelines and related equipment. i 2. Flow projections for year 2020 = 399 mgd Flow performance for 1990-91 = 234 mgd The difference of these two flows equals added capacity needed = 165 mgd by year 2020 L 3. Unit cost of flow/conservation related capital expenses = $235.6 Million 165 mgd $1.43 Million mgd or $1.43 gallon per day 4. Calculated Capital Dollar savings: 0.31 mgd x $1.43 Million = $443,300 mgd i V kow EXHIBIT 9 WW WW Estimate of Districts -Wide Water Conservation Flows A. Assumptions 1. Estimated Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units = 828,875* (Because of the short time period associated with responding to the Directors' information needs and the substantial research and analysis needed, the number of equivalent dwelling units was not further classified according to residential or commercial/industrial. It is recognized that the value of water conservation, be it rr based on number of toilets or some other value, will likely be higher for the service area's daytime work population in commerce and industry than for residential. This may be an important area of future study for the Districts' water conservation program. At this time all equivalent dwelling units were assumed to be households. According to the Orange County Progress Report, 1987- ,.. 1988, Volume 24, the total number of outlets relating to taxable transactions as of July 1, 1986, was 80,286.) r *Source - CSDOC 1991-92 Fiscal Year Budget 2. Estimated Number of Households Expected to Have Standard 6 gallon per flush toilets. Data from Orange County Progress Report MW Districts' Service Area Housing Units - 1980 = 583,237 Districts' Service Area Housing Units - 1991 = 828,875 Percent Units Prior to 1980 = 70% Number of Units with 6 gallon per flush toilets = 583,237 r+ Number of Units with 3.5 gallon per flush toilets = 828,875 - 583,237 = 245,638 Wo 3. Estimated Sewage Savings at Each Household Based on City of Anaheim Proposal as a Model 102.2 million gallons _ 4,000 HH=-25.550 gallons year year/HH MW W" ow EXHIBIT 9 (cont) For Post-1980 homes toilets - 1.9 gallons saved x 2.7 people x 4 flush x 365 days flush HH day/person year 7,489 gallons HH/year Showers identical to Anaheim model at: 20 gallons x 365 days = 7,300 gallons HH/day year HH/year B. Calculated Total Savings 1. Pre-1980 Households - Toilets: 25,550 gallons x 583,237 HH HH/year = 40.8 mgd 14.9 billion gallons year Showerheads: 7,300 gallons x 583,237 HH = 4.3 billion gallons HH/year year = 11.7 mgd 2. Post-1980 Households - Toilets: ,7,489 gallons x 245,638 HH = 1,840 million gallons HH/year year = 5.0 mgd EXHIBIT 9 (cont) Showerheads: 7,300 gallons x 245,638 HH HH/year = 1,793 million gallons year = 4.9 mgd Total Toilets and Showerheads = 9.9 mgd 3. Calculated.Total Savings = 62.4 mgd mw ww imw r how rr ww EXHIBIT 10 Estimate of Cost to Implement A. Assumptions 1. Total Cost Per Household Based on Anaheim model $953,799 _ 4,000 HH = $238.45 HH B. Calculated Total Program Cost 1. 828,875 HH x $238.45 = $198 Million HH 2. Cost Sharing Agency Percent Share of Total Project Costs by Agency MWD 42% $ 83.2 million City 29% $ 57.4 million CSDOC 29% $ 57.4 million ji Totals 100% $198.0 million EXHIBIT 11 Estimate of Districts -Wide O&M Savings .r 1. Annual ULF Toilet O&M Savings for Pre-1980 Households 25,550 gallons x .714 x 583,237 HH x $269.40 year/HH million gallons $2.87 million year 2. Annual LF Showerhead O&M Savings for Pre-1980 Households 25,550 gallons x .286 x 583,237 HH x $269.40 year/HH million gallons $1.15 Million year 3. Annual ULF Toilet O&M Savings for Post-1980 Households 7,489 gallons,x 245,638 HH x $269.40 bow HH/year million gallons $ .50 Million year 4. Annual LF Showerhead O&M Savings for Post-1980 Households 7,300 ciallons x 245,638 HH x $269.40 HH/year million gallons _ $ 0.48 Million year 5. Present Value of Toilet O&M Savings ($2.87 Million + $0.50 Million) x 7.3601 $24.8 Million year w w i�60 EXHIBIT 11 (cont) 6. Present Value of Showerhead O&M Savings ($1.15 Million + $0.48 Million) x 4.2124 = $6.87 Million year L 7. Total O&M Savings = $31.7 Million 8. Total Annual O&M Savings = $2.87 M + $1.15 M + $.50 M + $.48 M = $5.0 Million n L EXHIBIT 12 Estimate of Districts -Wide Capital Savings 62.4 mgd x $1.43 Million = $89 Million mgd Total Estimate Savings O&M Plus Capital $24.8 million + $6.87 million + $89 million = $120.7 million ww APPENDIX A I V L City of Anaheim Staff Report on Proposal For Funding to the L County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Ultra Low Flush Toilet Program July, 1991 ..d Proposal for Funding to the County Sanitation Districts of Orange.County Ultra Low -Flush Toilet Program dr City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department rr July 7, 1991 CITY OF ANAHEIM 1 PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 601 ULTRA LOW -FLUSH TOILET PROGRAM I, I. Introduction The City of Anaheim's Public Utility Department proposes to implement an ultra low -flush toilet retrofit program for all Anaheim utility customers. As a pilot project, the Ultra Low -Flush Toilet Program will provide for retrofitting 4,000 residential units and 1,000 commercial units with ULF toilets (1.6 gpf or less at 80 psi) and high efficiency showerheads (2.4 gpm or less at 80 psi) within a one year period. An analysis of the Department's residential water usage shows that toilets and showers account for a large percentage of all water used inside the home. The installation of ultra low -flush toilets and. high efficiency showerheads could reduce this usage by as much as 75 percent. Accordingly, if all residential customers in the City were to install ultra low -flush toilets and high efficiency showerheads, the City's residential water usage and resulting effluent could be significantly reduced. Similar reductions can also be realized by replacing toilets and showerheads in hotels, schools, hospitals and other commercial establishments. Of Anaheim's top fifty water users, eleven are either hotels or hospitals. With over 18,000 hotel and motel rooms in the City, many constructed during the 19601s, significant potential exists for water/effluent savings from these customers. II. Program Description y"r The Ultra Low -Flush Toilet Program is designed to encourage water conservation through the installation of water saving devices by providing our customers with financial incentives by way of rebates and reduced water bills to install ultra low -flush toilets and high efficiency showerheads. As a further incentive, the program furnishes an economical and convenient means of disposing of customers' old toilets. Anaheim has approximately 83,131 residential customers and 17,000 commercial customers that will be eligible for the Ultra Low -Flush Toilet Program. The initial program is designed to provide for the installation of 6,800 ultra low -flush toilets and high efficiency showerheads (1.7 toilets/showers per household) in residential units and 1,000 ultra low -flush toilets and high efficiency showerheads in hotels and other commercial establishments. The first phase of the program solicitation will consist of an announcement in the Departments's monthly publication, Currents. j The Currents announcement will provide a description of the program �•i and an estimate of the water savings which a customer can expect by installing ultra low -flush toilets and high efficiency showerheads. j The article will provide a 24 hour telephone number and a return Lj postcard. Customers can either call or return the postcard to request additional information on the program and rebate i.+ � 11 City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department _ Ultra Low -Flush Toilet Program Page 2 procedures. Following the initial program announcement in Currents, the Department will mail a second program announcement, again including a return postcard and the 24 hour per day telephone number, directly to clusters of 1,000 customers a week until every _ residential customer has been contacted. Mailing clusters will be adjusted during the life of the program depending on customer ..+ response rate. Customers requesting additional information will be mailed an information package containing: (1) a list of Anaheim plumbing supply houses which carry qualifying toilets and/or showerheads along with their approximate price; (2) a list of plumbing contractors and their estimated price for installation of the toilets; (3) a rebate application; and (4) information on how to dispose of old toilets by taking it to a recycling center or arranging for a free pick-up. Customers can then purchase a qualifying toilet and mail the application and their purchase receipt to the Department. The Department will field verify all toilet installations and, during this visit install high efficiency showerheads where applicable. Following verification of installation of the ultra low -flush toilets and installation of the high efficiency showerheads the Department will mail the customer a rebate check. Phase two of the program, targeted toward apartment owners and commercial customers, will run concurrent with phase one. This phase will consist of a letter from the Department followed by a - telephone solicitation offering to perform an on -site audit of the r� customer's facility and a personalized analysis of the customer's potential savings. If the customer elects to take part in the -- program, the customer's participation, including -disposal of the old toilets, will be coordinated by the Department's representative. The Department will document water/effluent savings, program ..r expenses, and identify service problems through follow-up surveys. Using this information the Department will recommend the implementation of an expanded program designed to reflect our findings. Based on the survey of service problems, the Department low will also decide whether to recommended a City ordinance which would require ultra low -flush toilets to be installed during any future remodeling of homes and/or commercial facilities. III. Water/Effluent Savings y As indicated in Attachments A and B, water/effluent savings for the program is estimated to be 349.39 acre-feet (AF) per year, or A* City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department Ultra Low -Flush Toilet Program Page 3 2,961.69 AF over the life of the equipment. This savings is based on the installation of 6,800 ultra low -flush toilets and high efficiency showerheads in 4,000 residences at a savings of 50 and y 20 gallons a day per household respectively, and 1,000 ultra low - flush toilets and high efficiency showerheads in 1,000 hotel and/or { motel rooms at a savings of 22.5 and 20 gallons a day per room �+ respectively. During the course of the program the Department will monitor and sub -meter a selected number of accounts to determine if f additional water/effluent savings resulting from behavioral changes have resulted from the program. IV Estimated a d Budget Costs for the program are based on prices received from potential suppliers and contractors and on the Department's current labor rates, including payroll burdens. As indicated in the Attachment C, the total cost of the program is $1,087,049. Of the total program costs, customer incentives for the ultra low -flush toilets represents $780,000. V. Funding This program would assist CSDOC in meeting its conservation goals by reducing effluent by 2,961.69 acre-feet over the life of the equipment. Without CSDOC's participation the City of Anaheim's Public Utility Department would be financially unable to implement the scope of this program. Given the above water/effluent savings assumptions and a ten year life for ultra low -flush toilets and a five year life for high L efficiency showerheads, water/effluent conserved from the program would be 2,961.69 AF. Using the Conservation Credits Program, financial participation from MWD at $154/AF will equal $456,100. The balance of the program cost would be shared by the Department and CSDOC. The Department's portion would be $315,478 and contributions from the CSDOC would total $315,471. VI. Evaluation Duringa period of one program y" p year following completion of the pro am the Department will track ten percent of the residential customer's usage and one hundred percent of the commercial customer's usage. The Department will also sub -meter "test groups" in the commercial I.�f customer class to determine the percentage of total water usage represented by toilets. In addition the Department will record expenses associated with each marketing approach (direct mail and residential and commercial on site audits) and will determine cost benefit ratios for each market segment. The Department will also L City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department Ultra Low -Flush Toilet Program Page 4 provide information to CSDOC and MWD as required for those agencies' analysis of the program. Additionally, the Department will participate in a joint study with MWD and CSDOC to determine the savings realized from ultra low - flush toilets installed in hotels. The information from this test will be used to adjust the Department's estimated savings for hotel and other commercial customers used in this program. Information obtained from these studies will be used by the Department to design cost effective long term programs and will be shared with other agencies within the state, including the State Department of Water Resources. Attachments - 3 Attachment A CITY OF ANAHEIM ULTRA LOW -FLUSH TOILET PROGRAM Residential• ULF Toilets - # of Toilets Estimated # Gallons Saved/ Total Gallons Total AF # of Homes per Household of Retrofits Day per Household Saved/Year Savings* 4,000 1.7 6,800 50 73,000,000 2,239.26 HE Showerheads - # of Showerheads Estimated # Gallons Saved/ Total Gallons Total AF # of Homes per Household of Retrofits Day per Household Saved/Year Savings* 4,000 1.7 6,800 20 29,200,000 447.85 Total savings per year (gallons). .... ...... ... ....................102,200,000 (313.5 AF) Total savings based on the life of the equipment* (acre-feet) ............................ ..............2,687.11 Estimated MWD participation @$154.00/AF.................................................................$413,815 * Based on a 10 year life for Ultra low -flush toilets and a 5 year life for high efficiency showerheads. Attachment I ! i ! I [ ( [ [ [ CITY OF ANAHEIM ULTRA LOW -FLUSH TOILET PROGRAM Hotel/motel: ULF Toilets - of Toilets Estimated f Gallons Saved/ Total Gallons Total AF of Rooms per Room Flushes/Day Day per Room■ Saved/Year• Savings* 1,000 1 5.5 22.55 6,201,250 190.22 HE showerheads - I of Showerheads Gallons Saved/ Total Gallons Total AF of Rooms per Room Day per Room Saved/Year• Savings* 1,000 1 20 5,500,000 84.36 Total savings per years (gallons)............................ ..................11,701,250 (35.89 AF) Total savings based on the life of the equipment* (acre-feet).............................................274.58 Estimated MWD participation @$154.00/AF.................................................................$42,285 ■ Estimated at 4.1 gallons saved per flush. N�'U-t /�-a'�'�• �v--�; • Assuming 275 days/year occupancy rate. * Based on a 10 year life for Ultra low -flush toilets, a 5 year life for High efficiency showerheads, and assuming 275 days/year occupancy rate. Attachment C CITY OF ANAHEIM ULTRA LOW -FLUSH TOILET PROGRAM PROJECT COST ANALYSIS Residential: Expense Type Total Cost Anaheim CSDOC MWD Incentives ($100/toilet @ 6,800 toilets) $680,000 $192,488 $192,487 $295,025 Showerheads (6,800) $ 35,700 $ 10,106 $ 10,105 $ 15,489 Labor & Materials: Labor (Collection of old toilets) $ 68,000 $ 19,249 $ 19,249 $ 29,502 Labor (Customer contacts @ $20/contact) $ 80,000 $ 22,646 $ 22,645 $ 34,709 Materials & supplies (Program announce- ments, direct mails, etc.) $ 58,099 $ 16,446 $ 16,446 $ 25,207 Documentation & measurement (4,000 verifica- tions @ $8 ea.) $ 32,000 $ 9,059 $ 9,058 $ 13,883 TOTAL RESIDENTIAL COSTS: $953,799 $2691994 $269,990 $413,815 Hotel/Motel• Expense Type Total Cost Anaheim CSDOC MWD Incentives ($100/toilet @ 1,000 toilets) Showerheads Labor (160 contacts @ $50 ea.) Documentation (Metering & data collection) $100,000 $ 5,250 $ 8,000 $ 20,000 $ 34,134 $ 1,792 $ 2,731 $ 6,827 $ 34,133 $ 1,792 $ 2,730 $ 6,826 $ $ $ $ 31,733 1,666 2,539 6,347 TOTAL HOTEL/MOTEL COSTS: $133,250 $ 45,484 $ 45,481 $ 42,285 TOTAL PROGRAM COSTS: $1,087,049 $315,478 $315,471 $456,100 APPENDIX B Consumer Reports How to Save Water Performance Report on Low Flush Toilets July, 199,0 very day. Americans flush more than 5 billion gallons of water down the toilet. That's about 31,� billion gal- _ _ Ions more than is actually needed for effective flushing. Americans also shower with 3 billion gallons of water a day, 11/4 billion gallons more than is needed. Most of that wasted water ---enough to supply the residential water needs of more than 80 million people —is from municipally supplied water systems. Now, communities from Boston to Los Angeles and from Peoria to Houston are finding that the cost of supplying water is rocketing upward. Drinking water in most areas of the country used to be cheap and abundant. thanks either to plentiful local supplies or to Feder- ally subsidized water projects. But the siteanon is changing. With an Uncle Sam gone stingy, old cities like New York and Boston are hard pressed to maintain their aging water systems. And cities and suburbs everywhere are contending with polluted sources. sinking water tables, and the demands of a rising population. (Sewage disposal, whether it invo€ves septic tanks or sewer sys- tems, is emerging as another major problem. The well-pubEicized Boston Harbor mess is just one example of an overextended sew- age system. A reduction in the amount of water usage means a reduction in the load on sewer systems.) Since extending an existing supply is cheaper than building new capacity, water utilities have joined with conservationists ro urge the adoption of fixtures such as those we tested for the reports that follow. For conservationists, the issue is simple: Con- servation means fewer dams and less environmental damage. For municipalities, conservation promises the postponement or can- cellation of costly new supply and wastewater facilities. For consumers, conservation makes economic sense. too. By our calculations, an average family that uses municipal water can save as much as S50 to S75 per year on water and sewer bills by switching to low -flow shower heads and low -flush toilets. Energy savings from reduced hot-water use in the shower can save S20 to $50 more. Low -flow fixtures can benefit even people who have their own well, reducing both energy costs and the strain on septic systems and leaching fields. In fact, for most Americans, the question is not whether but when well see low -flow fixtures in our homes. Seven states (California, Connecticut. Georgia, Massachusetts. New York. Rhode Island. and Washington) have passed laws requiring 1.6-gallon toilets and other water -saving fixtures in new construction. Meanwhile, two bills working their way through Congress would set national standards for plumbing fixtures and require low -flow fixtures in all new construction. People in the plumbing -fixture industry are not happy about all this. They argue that there's no need for regulations on water - saving fixtures, and point out that more than 90 percent of fresh- water consumption is by agriculture and industry. That's a specious argument. Most people don't take their drinking water directly from rivers, lakes, and wells the way farms and factories do. They have to buy it from a utility —and theyll save both water and money by using low -flow fixtures. Of more immediate concern to fixture manufacturers, perhaps, is the fate of their profitable "designer" toilets. should a 1.6-gallon standard become the norm. Today's trendy toilets are one-piece "low boy' models with an elongated bowl and a large water -sur- face area- They cannot be easily adapted to flush with 1.6 gallons. Manufacturers have been joined by regulation -wary plumbing - trade groups, which have raised the specter of a threat to public health if low -flush toilets are adopted. That claim is based on the vague suspicion that low -flush toilets will lead to clogged sewer drains. We've seen no credible evidence that that happens in real life. It certainly didn't in our tests for the following report. a. r 9M CONSUMER REPORTS JULY 1990 Copyright 1990 by Consumers Union of United States, Inc., Mount Vernon, NY 10553 reprinted by permission from CONSUNIER REPORTS, July 1990. 465 PART 1 The farther it fails In a gravity toilet, the force In a forceful flush comes from tailing water-4he higher 1he tank, the harder the flush. Old toilets maintained a high pressure with an overhead tank. LOW -FLUSH TOILETS oilet-flushing represents the greatest demand on this country's residential water supply. accounting for about 38 per- cent of all the water used indoors. For decades the conventional Amer- ican toilet used , gallons of water per flush. Ironically, this toilet was the "modern" replacement for the old Edwardian-styie pull -chain water closet, which needed only 2.5 gal- lons to flush. In the late 1970s, fixture manufac- turers introduced the so-called water -conserving toilet. It uses 3.5 gallons per flush. and has been the norm in new construction for about 10 years. The newer low -gush toilets are even more sparing: They use only L.6 gallons or less. Low -flush toilets are new only to Americans. Europeans have had them for years --the 1.6gallon fig- ure that defines low -flush toilets came about because it's the equiva- lent of six liters, the flush volume specified by many Euro- pean plumbing codes. The 11 low -gush toilets we tested, priced from S100 to S285, represent every model we could find last fall when we did our shopping. Big American brands like Kohler, Crane. and American Standard had only recently intro- duced their low -flush mod- els; Ifo Sanitaire, a Swedish company, has been selling low -flush toi- lets here for several years. Ten of the toilets are meant to replace a conven- tional household com- mode. The eleventh is a special-purpose model: As the box on page 468 explains, the Rush -a Matic is a lightweight plas- tic device that would suit a vacation cabin better than a suburban home. We also tested a S40 replacement tank, the Geberit, that purports to turn a conventional 5 gal- lon toilet into a 3.5-gallon model. The Geberit tank proved a disappointment. reducing the toilet's effi- ciency along with the water use. To see how the new -age toilets stack up against a conventional one, we included in our tests a widely sold ffohfer Wellworth 3.5-gallon toi- - let and an old, 5-gallon .American Standard, Seven of the low -flow toilets use gravity to flush, just as conventional toilets do. Three use a novel pres- surized -flush system: A pressure vessel inside the toilet tank is oper- ated by water -line pressure: the pressurized flush is supposed to compensate for the reduced water volume. The new system isn't as good as a well -designed gravity - flush system. we found. Halwkti mapim 3oA: The performance of toilets and other plumbing fixtures sold in this country is looseiy governed by stan- dards developed by the American National Standards Institute. Com- pliance with ANSI standards is vol- untary, but manufacturers tend to conform, in part because the stan- dards are largely created by repre- sentatives of the big fixture companies. Another reason to con- form: Those standards eventually become part of the plumbing codes in many areas of the country. While the system has worked well enough to ensure that up to now all the toilets made in the U.S. perform acceptably, the standard -setting pro- cess has bogged down over the issue of low -flow toilets. After almost 10 years of discussion, the ANSI subcommittee responsible for promulgating revised standards has been unable to agree on appropriate tests. (In fact, conservationists cite the delay as one reason 1.6-gallon toilets have not been marketed more aggressively.) After looking at existing and pro- posed ANSI standards. we decided to develop our own, more severe tests. Our primary tests were designed to tax in a realistic way a toilet's ability to dispose of bulky waste and to clean the bowl after- ward. Our secondary tests looked at how well the toilets could handle floating paper waste. how com- pletely they exchanged water between flushes, how far they would propel solid waste down a sewer, REPLACE YOUR OLD COMMODE? IT DOES PAY T4 SWITCH Water and sewer rates vary so widely from city to city, even within the same region of the country, that it's not always meaningful to speak of average dollar savings from water -con- serving measures. The table below focuses on 13 representa- tive cities and estimates the sav- ings in combined water and sewer costs that a family might expect each year if it switched from an old-fashioned 5ga€lon toilet to a low -flaw model. If the new toflet cost SM. including installation. it would pay for itself in about three years if you lived in a highcost area like Houston and in just over 12 years in moderately priced Day- ton. A toilet typically has at least a 20-year life expectancy, so it might pay to change over even if your own water costs are low. In our calculations, we assume a three -person family whose members each flush the toilet at home four times a day, The sav- ings are based on switching from an older. 5-gallon toilet to a 1.6- gallon toilet. Switching from a 3.5-gallon to a 1.6-gallon would save only about half as much. If you have more than three people in your household, or d your water rates go up sign& candy, you'd get your money back faster. Installing more than one toilet, of course, would Mend the payback period pro- portionately. W ntar a sewwr coal Annual cry PW 1000 gal.' saving Houston $4.19 $62 Atlanta 3.64 54 Poona.11f. 3.58 53 Dallas 3.56 53 St. Petersburg, Fla. 3.24 48 San Francisco 2,78 41 Cinannau - 2.60 39 Boston 2,54 38 Las Angeles 1.95 29 New Yorx City 1,84 27 Chicago 1.15 17 Fresno. Calif. 1 11 17 Dayton, Ohio 1.11 16 ' $oim q AfM41f Young 6 CO 466 CONSUMER REPORTS JULY 199C In the good old days As long as toilets had lots of water to work with, designers needed to pay but scant attention to the underlying hydraulics of a flush. As one designer told us, 'You took a lump of day, molded it, drilled 30 holes by hand. It wasn't a precision instrument." Large volumes of water simply leveled out the sample-to-sample.variations. With tow -flush toilets, every ounce of water has to be put to work. Here's how two basic types do that: The gravity flush The most elegant solutions use gravity to speed the course of water through the bowl and trap. The rim wash IN comes through an open slot rather than little holes. The bowl may have steep sides © and a narrowed trap . opening B. Limiting the amount of water held in the bowl can realize further sav- Ings. Low -flush toilets generally have a smaller pool p , or'rvater spot," than conventional toilets: four by five inches rather than eight by nine. The smaller water spot does mean more frequent cleaning with a toilet brush. The pressurizer flush Another way to increase the water's velocity is to use a pressurized flush. One design utllizes•the house's waterline pressure. It pressurizes water held In a vessel © within the toilet tank Inlet water presses against a rubber diaphragm inside the vessel, compressing a pocket of air. Push- ing the flush valve Q releases the water. Other designs use compressed.air from an outside source, such as a compressor or compressed -air tanks. In our tests, pressurized -flush toilets didn't work as well as the best -designed gravity -flush models. CONSUMER REPORTS JULY 1990 L 467 li r Trick for an old toilet A water -filled plastic jug in a 5-galion toiiet'a tank will reduce the volume ifthout atfectfng the water level. Don't use a brick. tt can iisintegrate and Jam the works. drain line. and their propensity for splashing during a flush. Flushing. From a tester's point of view, the most difficult challenge was to devise a test material that accurately simulates human excre- ment- ANSI uses a dual test In one series, the toilet tries to flush a load of 100 three -quarter -inch plastic halls. A second series uses water - filled latex cylinders. Neither test differentiates very clearly one t6 let's performance from anothet's. For instance, the latex cylinders are so slippery that no toilet we tested had a real problem with them. We therefore ran slightly modi- fied versions of the tests and inter- preted the results a bit more stringently than ANSI does. For one thing, we came up with a more real- istic analog waste material, com- posed of coarse sawdust bound together with flour and shortening and including a sufficient quantity of tiny, hollow plastic beads to make it just barely buoyant. This worked admirably as a severe test of a t6 Ws waste -handling ability. The top five toilets in the Ratings disposed of a load of three cylinders of this material in one flush, an excellent performance- The next two models, as well as the old STAon model, took two flushes, which was shill very good The bottom -rated toilets failed to empty the bowl even after five flushes. We looked next at each toilet's Country commode Lightweight plastic Flush-0-Matic ($233) is only for a rustic and severely water -deprived environment. To flush, a stiffly spring -loaded handle opens a flapper valve in trap, water flows only as long as han- dle is depressed, a real water -saver (it uses only .5 to I gallon). But if handle is released quickly, snappy valve can catapult contents of bowl up and out, ability to deal with paper waste, said to be a problem for low -flush toilets We used a tampon (along with its wrapper applicator) and several feet of toilet paper. None of the toilets had any remarkable problem. BawkiemiDg. After bulls -waste disposal, a toilet's ability to cleanse the bowl as it flushes is probably its most important attribute. Toilets that leave streaks of residue may impel some people to flush again and again, which defeats the pur- pose of a lows -flush toilet We used two kinds of streaks (see Puidn8s)• The two conventional toilets and seven lowdush models rid them- selves of essentially all the streaks in one flush - Drain -line dogging. Plumbing trade associations have alleged that lowered flush volumes will cause clogs in a house's main drain line. Those feats aren't justified: Water generated by other fixtures on the drain line (showers, washers, sinks) ought to compensate for the toilet's deficiL In the only real -life comparison study we know of, in Phoenix, drain - line clogging appeared jo be no worse with low -flow toilets than with conventional. 3.5-gallon toilets. Clog- ging of the toilet itself was a far greater problem with the conven- tional toilets In our own tests, detailed in the Ratings, it took our conventional toi- lets about two flushes, on average, to clear a load of waste material through a 60-foot drain pipe. Most of the top -rated toilets took about 21k flushes, on average. The differ- ence isn't significant, and we gave high marks here to four low -flow models. Even a toilet faring poorly in this test shouldn't pose problems in real life. However, if you have an unusual installation, say a solitary half -bathroom that drains into a very long horizontal plumbing run, you should choose a model that did well here. R F 11 f9Q11�0!!K Ali the low -flow toilets use a lot less water than a conventional toilet In choosing one model over anoth- er, what matters most is bulk -waste disposal and bowl cleansing. Three models excelled: the Kohler Welltaorth Lite, S240; the Sears 5560, $100 plus shipping; and the Ifv Cas- cade, $203. We would recommend atry of those without reservation, but the Sears, also sold as the Uni- versal Rux&e. is clearly the bargain of the group. While the toilets at the top of the Ratings outperformed the toilets lower on the fist, that doesn't mean that lower -ranking toilets would not perform adequately. Tice old, con- ventional 5-gallon American Stan - CONSUMER REPORTS JULY 1990 dard would have ranked about sixth in the Ratings --yet its performance has proved acceptable over many years: The 3.5%allon Kohkr Wellwordc, the model typical of the toilets used in newer bathrooms, would have just topped our Ratings. Using it and the 5-gallon American Standard as guideposts, we'd judge any of the top five low -flush toilets RATINGS to be very good performers. The Seals 5561 and the essen- d* similar Elio 1.6 were downrated because their narrow trap opening had a hard time with our bulk waste material. Low -flush toilets can be difficult to find, as we discovered when we did our shopping. That situation should improve as more manufac- Listed by groups in order of overall per- formance. Within groups. ranked primarily by ability to dispose of solid wastes and to dean the bowl. 0 Pria. What CU paid last fall: + means shipping is extra. ©Gallons per flash. Since. water con- sumption varied a little according to line pressure, we measured water use at two pressures, nominally 20 and 80 pounds per square etch (psi). taikwasto. The results of four waste. disposal tests. two of our own and two developed by the American National Stan- dards Institute (see story). The severest test fi vowing flushing three pieces of a syn- thetic analog of human waste. Toilets that flushed the whole load in one flush scored a O, two flushes got a e, and so on, down to those that hadn't cleared the bowl after five attempts, which received a •. In another test, we tried flushing a tam- pon, its wrapper and cardboard applicator, Inlets broaden their brand lines. As of now, some confusion still ezists. Toilets labeled "water miser'' or 4w& ter save are not necessarily low - flush toilets. Often they're the 3.5. gallon variety that have been . available for years. True low flush models generally bear such labels as '1.6 gallon," "ultm4ow$usb." or tigli-effidency.' and a measured amount of toilet paper. Ail but one model emptied everything with one Bush: The Ejer 1.6took two flushes. © Bowl cleaning. Combined scores from two tests. Using a felt market, we drew a Cane around the inside of the bowl just below the rim. After Hushing we measured how much, if any, of the ink stripe was left. In the second test we smeared abroad streak Of canned dog food around the inside of the bowl and noted the number of flushes it took to clear it off. Top -scoring models left We or no ink after one flush, and no dog food after one or two flushes. The worst left several inches of info and took three or four fkcshes to dear the dog food. ®Floating waste. Dlsposmg of waste that floats is ImportaM, though less so than han- dling bulky waste. In this test we placed fly 25W buoyant polyethylene gran - Was in the bowl and counted how many were left after flushing. The best here left fewer than 16 granules behind, the worst AM under 100. ® Oildion ratio. The completeness of / / � 0,1� ',�; water change in the bowl with each flush, a concem in preventing growth of bacteria. A toilet is said to have a poor dilution ratio if a significant portion of the water in the bowl before flushing remains with the, water that refills it. To test dilution, we put a blue dye Into the bowl, flushed the toilet, and meas- ured the color of the water after the bowl refilled. The best allowed less than one thousandth of the blue dye to stay behind. the worst left more than one part in 200. ® Drain4lao carry. How well a low -flush toilet could transport solid wastes down a sewer pipe. We constructed a 60-foot4ong on drain pipe. positioned the toilets at one end, and used our synthetic bulk waste material as a test medium. The best trans- ported three pieces of waste down 60 feet Of An after 2% flushes, on average. The second-best took less than 31h flushes: the worst ones hadn't deared the pipe otter five Rushes. The practical differences are not as great as they may seem. In actual use, drainage from other household fixtures tends to aid the flow stream in a waste pipe. armwfew am" r a r r r® ra r® r®ra r Kohlor Wollww A cite $240 1.6 1.6 0, O O O O — Saars tat. Ne. 5560 (universal Barrie) 100+ 1.4 1.9 O O e O O E No casews 203 1.0 1.0 O O O • • A E clan. 285 1.3 1.4. O e O e O B.C.D Artesian soda Fe 0 129 1A 1.9 •O 0 0 e e — Gerber 260 1.3 1.3 e O O O O B.C.D Afeirlm Stenrard 188 1.4 1.7 e 0 • O O e 9.C.D.E 1ljor uhm 16 208 1.1 0.8 O O O O • — Sews CO. No. 5361 (Aqualb») 130+ 1.6 1.5 • O O O O — 11for 1.6 154 1.4 1.5 O e • 0 — 0 According to the manufacanw. this modelis sdmhdsd fora redesign Mid year. M ReBuits incmwiuwmbequse of pwrhanWing ofbulk waste. Key b combeets A -Top- mounteo pull -to -flush knob. D-FhM nosier d= most. B-Top-mounted Qress-to-Nush knob. E-Water en the bowi tanded to splash as high as C-Has pressunsecl-flush tank. the bottom of the seat dunng a flush. CONSUMER REPORTS JULY 1990 469 l .6* 60 40 tar! iW 401 w lw V 61d iow APPENDIX C Consumer Reports How to Save Water Performance Report on Low Flush Showerheads July, 1990 r.I LOW -FLOW SHOWER HEADS Panelists` favor Showering staffers highest votes to sh ers from two hand - heads. Shown is Teiedyne's Water Shower Massage, which uses less w per minute than th other best -liked he the Sears 20173, $ ew pleasures in life compare with a long hot shower, as anyone with teen-agers in the house can attest. But showers con- sume more than one -fifth of all the water used indoors, and more hot water than any other fixture or appii- ance. Installing a low -flow shower head is a simpie and inexpensive way to cut down on that water use. For $10 or so per shower installation, the average family can save 5000 to 10,000 gallons of water each year, plus the energy it took to heat half that water. perhaps S20 to SM. (As the saying goes, your mileage may vary. Savings depend. among other things, on how long and how often your family members shower, which kind of shower heads you currently own• and how much you pay for heating water.) Before 1980. shower heads could deliver-frve to eight gallons of water per minute. Over the last decade, nationwide water shortages have prompted public officials, consumers, and manufac- it• tvrers to want to reduce gave that figure. ow- During past drought held emergencies many home- owners installed flow Pik restrictors, washer -like $43. disks that fit into a show- terer's inlet end. But e oftentimes the flow ad. restrictors cut the quality of the shower along with 23. the flow, and consumers simply removed them. Meanwhile, manufac- turers have gradually scaled back the flow rates of new shower heads while trying to ' maintain the quality of the shower. Heads designed for low flow usually have a narrower spray area so less water misses the showerer, they may also entrain air with the water, to create a turbulent flow. Most of the new shower heads available are low -paw heads that deliver 3 gallons per minute or less. Legisla- tion is pending in several states and in Congress that would set standards requiring all new shower heads to use no more than 2.5 gallons per minute. We bought and tested 34 low -flow shower heads of two major types. Twenty-four are fixed -position heads, the familiar swiveling kind that screws directly onto the shower pipe. Ten are hand-held "micro- phone" heads, which are tethered to the shower pipe with a flexible hose. Those have a clip or fixture that can position them like a fixed shower. Prices vary widely: for the fixed type, from $3 to S75: for the hand- helds, from $11 to 895. Designs and styles vary widely, too. The simplest are fixed -position heads that deliver only one type of spray, such as a steady rain or a mist Others have adjustment knobs or levers that give two or more spray patterns, sometimes including a pulse or "massage" spray. The most complex. two hand-held PoUem= models, have four distinct spray patterns, a three -position adjustment for each pattern, and a "regulator' knob marked for 15 set- tings of flow rate. Some ii w it Ihot The key question with a low -flow head is not so much the quantity of water as the quality of the shower, so we turned to a panel of staffers. Using a heavily instrumented shower facility we built in one of our labs, 16 soggy souls took roughly 350 showers over the course of sev- eral months. Since a good shower means different things to different people, we instructed the staffers to adjust the heads and the faucets to get the best shower they could by their own lights. After each shower, we asked the staffers how well they Red the shower, on a five -point scale. We ran trials for each shower head at both low and high water -line pressures (20 and 80 pounds per square inch) to bracket the range one is fikely to encounter in the real world. For the most part, our panel- ists liked the same heads at both low and high pressures. The Rat- ings scores are based on prefer. ences at 80 psi, but we also note shower heads that were particularly liked (or disliked) at 20 psi. Panelists judged 11 of the fixed - position showers very good. But the highest votes went to the hand-held :writ ?0 t s as I Water :'rk Shower ,viasr ;1r,3J Price was no guide to the quality of the shower heads: Six of the high- est -rated fixed -position heads cost S10 or less. And two expensive mod- els —the Moen, S45. and the Water Pik SM-5, S44, were at the bottom of their groups in the Ratings. Pouring it on We measured the shower heads' maximum flow rates with the taps fully open, at water -line pressures of 20 and 80 psi. At low pressure. they ranged from 1.0 to 2.4 gallons pe; minute. At high, they ranged from 1.8 to 5.4 gpm. At that pressure, almost half the heads produced 2.5 gpm or less. meaning they'd pass muster 4 the pending water -fixture legislation becomes law. Go with the flow? The shower I heads offer three ways to adjust the flow pattern. Panelists strongly disliked a knob in the center of the stream U , like that on the low - rated Alsons Somerset. The pre- ferred a knob on the side a, as on the Kohler City Club; or a ring - around -the -head type El , as on the Water Pik Shower Massage. r e+r am No um Suspecting that most people don't shower with both hot and cold taps going full blast. we also measured the actual flow rates our panelists elected when they showered. They always used less than the maximum possible —in some cases as much as a gallon per minute less. At low pressure, they used an average of 1.4 gpm: at high pressure. 2.5 gpm on average. Interestingly, our panelists did not automatically favor higher flow rates over lower ones. They gave top marks to one fairly high -flowing head, the 3.1-gallon Sears 20173. but didn't much like the 3.21allon Alsons Somerset. And while they found more heads to their liking when the water was at high pres- sure, they especially liked the two Zin-Has heads at low pressure. Low pressure proved too great a hurdle for the NY -Del: Its perfor- mance at 20 psi was so puny we couldn't rate it there at all. If your own water pressure is on the low side. avoid the NY -Del. Several other models that performed poorly at low pressure, though better than the NY -Del, are noted in the Ratings. Three Water Pik models would have suffered the same kite, but their flow restrictors could be reversed or removed to increase the flow. As the Ratings note, we made those adjustments in our low-pres- sure trials. in an effort to obtain decent showers. Turning the restrictor around or removing it didn't make them high -flow heads: At low pressure. they still delivered less than 2.5 gprrL Still. we aren't impressed with heads whose design lets you —even encourages you --to remove the flow restrictor. Fsaf w" pwfor� We gathered opinions and com- ments from our panelists (after, not during their showers) in an effort to pin down just what it was they liked or didn't like about each head We found, alas, no general agreement on what made a good shower. For the most part, panelists were unimpressed with the multiplicity of features some heads offered. Nearly all the staffers strongly disliked cen- ter -adjustment knobs, the kind that require you to reach into the stream to adjust the flow pattern. Panelists who used one type of flow for lather- ing up and another for rinsing, say, markedly preferred an adjustment on the side or periphery of the head. They had only one other strongly held opinion —that the Polknex CONSUMER REPORTS DULY 1990 DMI50 and DMI09 were noisy at high pressure. Reio1RIfMNdgfiow Our showering staffers gave high marks to II fixed -position showers and five hand-held ones. Several of the fixed heads our panelists lilted best are especially good buys. Among those, the Sews 20I70 and the 77termo Sauer CF01 cost only $6 or so; the Resoarres Conservation cost $7. while the $8 Ex -Has 14-9601-Fand S10 Zin-Pfas 14-9550 were nearly as inexpensive and had the added virtue of being Liked even at low pressure. If you like a hand-held shower. go for the Sears 20173 S23, or the Water Pile SM-3U. $43. Of the two, the Water Pik used almost a gallon less per minute, at least at high pressure, so we'd recommend it on ecological if not on economic grounds. <f you have notably low water pressure in your bathroom, you might have to remove the flow restrictor from the Water Pik to get a decent shower. A good candidate at low pressure would be the Pollentr Dial Massagt DM 209. $24. The panelists felt it performed bet- ter at 20 psi than at 80. Installing a new shower head is a simple task Follow the directions that come with the head. That usu- ally means removing the old shower head with large pliers or an adjust- Pich of the fixed Eleven fixed heads gave very good showers. said panelists. In that group, they liken! the $6 Sears 20170 (above) every bit as much as the $39 Chatharn. able wrench. If it doesn't want to come off easily, steady the inlet pipe with a pipe wrench. Then simply screw the new head into place. using the appropriate tool. Unless the instructions specify otherwise, it's usually a good idea to wind the pipe threads with a few turns of pipe -joint tape, available at hardware stores. And put a rag between the pHer jaws so as not to mar the fizaire's finish. ■ SHowmmG WhH A Low Fww IS THERE A SCALD ? A few tmattfieturem of km ow heads, notably the Delta Corporation, have can.. tioned that low wow shower heads have the potential of scalding the user unieaa the p$tmbing is fitted with spedal antiscald device. The theory is that if sameone fhtsl a tolet connected to the same cold - water Ene as the shower, a low-flmv shower head will exacerbate the effects of any readting pressure drop. With a low4low heed in place. $tuhm a taild can cause a pressaire'' change- Hot water 5 r r - 1 the shower's Qold water back up into its supply pipe lexvidg. only hot-water com- ing ottt of the shower. We tested aR our shower heads using half - inch supply lines and a quick -opening valve that siantlated a toffs flimhing, Under the specific canditinns we created, then* as indeed a geoid ha=d- The problem shouldn't occur in bath- rooms that were property plumbed to begin with. Good plumbing practice specf= that ttrree-quartrr-iach supply pipes should serve bathrooms, and that would tend to minimize the problem_ Further, major na- tional plumbing- codes call for the insmlla- tion of thermostatic mixing valves, pressure - balancing valves, or andsctld valves is showers, any of which should also obviate the problem. It would be wise to make sure your bath- room is property phunbed. Try running your shower (on you hand) and have some- one flush the toileL if there is a significant tie rise in your shower with your present shower .head when the toilet is fhtshed, chances are you'd risk a scald using a low&ah head Father have as antiscaW valve installed (a job for a plumber), set your water heater lower (to 120° or so), or make sure the door is locked when you shower. 471 e RATINGS e o c ww" ___w Shower heads that were liked most con - ® Panelists' preforem. These scores are derived from the experience of a panel sistently earned the highest scores; those of staffers: Panelists were instructed to ad- that were most disliked got the lowest. MW Listed by type in order of preference ,as just each shower as desired, and afterward Those with middling scores. and those that determined by a panel of users. Within type, asked to judge how well they liked it. The were liked by some and disliked by others, bracketed models were about equally pre- judgments are based on tests conducted at were ranked in between. ferred, and are listed in order of increasing 80 psi pressure; the heads generally scored © Panelists' flew -rate. Here we list the price• a little tower at 20 psi. (See Comments coi- average flow rate, in gallons per minute. our n Prise. What CU paid. rounded to the umn for the models the panelists particu- panelists actually used at the settings they nearest dollar. larly liked or disliked at 20 psi.) chose. snow i mein peeelists' Masieroa Spray and flow-refe,"w ©flex-feft'"w ®peisesaltings law 00 Seas EMrrsy-Savie Shewrr Neal 20170 S 6 e 2.1 2.6. 2.4 2.9 - r - - Tbr Sever Dynam Ci01 e e 1.1 2.3 1.3 2.8- Resewses Cwtservati" The Iaeredikfo Need ES-181 7 e 1.0 1.9 1.0 2.0 ✓ - - - _irrc ZbW%s trots SheworhaW 14.96014 a e 1.5 2.9 1.9 3.6 _ ✓ ✓ - ZLn4%s water PhlrhN 14.9550 10 a 12 2.4 1.4 2.7 - ✓ - -- Medea vertu shower S52C 0rmd VOwellm water Ewer Master a28400 10 11 a a 1.1 1.0 2.1 2.4 1.3 12 2.5 2.6 r - - ✓ ✓ - r - AmeAkm Stmdwd Shower Need Mews 10509.0020A is a .9 2.5 1.3 2.9 - ✓ r - TolodyMr wafer Pik Shwnr Masser 5 SW20 24 a 1.91[11 2.4 2.4 0 2.7 - ✓ - 2 Chathm $@1W anss shooter Naafi 44-3S 39 a 1.8 2.7 2.0 2.8 - ✓ ✓ - --A" Trl water Pik Shower Nasser a SM-4 40 a 1.1 2.3 1.3 2.5 - ✓ ✓ 4 Molard ELOM avie Adjrstahle 3610 10 O 12 2.4 1.4 2.8 - ✓ r - ir kimsZ Ord N 551" 0M I SO 15 O 1.9 2.0 2.3 2.2 r ✓ - 2 -� New 111116402 19 O 1.1 2.o 12 2.5 - r - -- sPraka Asystraaw:22S341 29 O 1.6 2.3 2.0 2.5 - to r - KrWrr City Clan K-73S1 75 O 1.8 2.6 2.2 2.8 - r r - NT-0e155" 3 Q - 1.7 1.1 1.8 - r to - Ondhie water satyr 284" 9 Q 1.7 2.4 2.3 2.7 - r w - K*Mw Tram 11740 10 Q 1.3 2.4 2.1 2.7 - No , r - Alson Somerset 673 11 Q 1.8 32 1.8 4.7 - ✓ to - 1e.t sMadw Cem"wi m 52270-AE 12 Q 1.9 22 2.3 2.8 - r ✓ Pellosw Nd Masser 0M109 0 Q 12 1.5 1.3 2.7 - ✓ ✓ 2 Alvan Alspff-Masser Adlaa 690C MooM PalsatbM 3M 33 45 Q Q 12 1.5 2.4 2.0 1.8 1.8 3.1 2.9 - ✓ - ✓ - 1 - 1 Soars Porseaaf Nand SMwer 20173 23 O 1.5 • &1 -1.6 3.4 - ✓ - 1 TrhfiyMa avatar Pik Shmw m4asaar 5 SM40 43 O 1.2121 2.3 12M 2.6 - ✓ - 2 11 a 1.1 25 1.3 . 2.e - ✓ - 45C 58 a 1.5 25 1.6 2.7 - ✓ - 1 water Pik S14M swer U4 95 a 1.3 2.2 1.3 2.4 - to - 1 16 1.1 22 12 25 - ✓ ✓ venom Did Nasser 0M20! 24 O 1.8 25 22 5.4 - r r 2 Pdleftz Did Masfer/Stemy Miff DM230 29 O 15 3.1 2.3 4.9 r r - 2 Pr yir Splash 2461 35 O 1.1 2.6 1.7 2.8 - ✓ - 1 Toledyar water Pik Shower Nasser a M5 44 O 1.6 0 2.1 1.9 0 2.5 - ✓ r 4 ff Tested AMPS, withMmstp too, (see story). M Tested at 20 psi with restriotor reversed (sae story). ti„y 472 CONSUMER REPORTS JULY 1990 QAAa=imum flow -rate. How many gal- lons per minute each shower head could produce with the supply taps fully open at low and high water -line pressures. © Spray and pulse settings. The major spray settings (mid, five, 4eerse) and the number of different poise settings. if any, each shower head Could produce. Some models, noted in the Comments, had nu- merous other settings as well. We also note the type of diostiewd device each head provides —center (Q. ring (R), or knob (K). Panelists least liked center adjustments, which force you to reach unto the spray. 0 Materials/finis. The construction ma- terial and finish layer for each head: -plastic (th, metal (N) or chrome -finished plastic (C). We noted no performance differences be- tween a plastic and a metal heed. o Warranty. Coverage of parts. It + ■ �' 7 -1 spa T' Y Altt A� standar diameter threaded M/c — — shower type. All hand -Bold mooWs come with, a 5-foot ffexiNs — M 36 G hose, and. except as noted, a clip to hang them M 12 B.G from shower inlet pipe. K M — A,H Key te Commas" M — A A- onsistsntly liked at 20 psi. — M 38 G B-Consnftntly disliked at 20 psi. C-Canter-knob adjustment: judged less destr- C P — C.G han er lypes. C MfC — C O-1udgedabletnaottswWthan most at 80 psi. E-Judged too feeble to use at 20 psi. R M/C 12 I F-Hew attaches to wall mount (irlduded). C'Has shut-off Yaffe. K M — J H-Side-mounted adjvsm»rtt fever. R MrC 12 K 1-CanrnmsprayvaMpulse_ J-Side mounted adjustment knob. K C — B.G.J K-Can moo fine and coarse spray. r L-Force oorrtmuously adjtntaNd on each set- R P 3 D.L brig. M — G M-Comes with extension pipe. K MJC — J K M 12 8,J C P C.E C MIC — C • . C M/C 12 c `►._ C M/P 12 C M- C MIP — C R P 3 K C 1 ; B.J K MIP 24 J,M R M/C — — R M/P 12 1 — P — G R M/P 12 — Overdesigned? Several shower heads, like K MIP 24 F this Pollenex Dial Massage DM209, provide R M/P 12 -- more choices than you might want to make first R M/P 3 A,L thing in the morning, This $24 model can give R MIP a L you a mist, a fine spray, a coarse spray, and R PIC 12 a several pulse settings. Our panelists were not R PIC 12 K impressed with the variety of features —indeed, made little use of them. This model was well down in the Ratings of hand-held heads. CONSUMER REPORTS JULY 19M Sumer CRepo�s 1lSE VSCE P�C� �8 2g8b 1.9� Find out fast how much that used car is really worth! Hear the current market value for any 1982-89 vehicle, including minivans and pickups, with a call from a Touch -Tone phone. You'll hear. e Current market price —whether you're buying a used car pri- vately or from a dealer, selling it yourself, or trading in your old model. The price you'll hear ` takes into account mileage, It major options, ana your region of the U.S. *Trouble Index -compiled from Consumer Reports Frequency - of -Repair records. t The -service costs you $1.50 per minute (about $T50 for a typical calf You'll be charged on your lo- cal phone bill. Call 7 days a week �. between 7:00 am and 2:00 am ' EST (Sorry, no service available for Alaska and Hawaii.) In certain areas of the country, �. 900 service Is not available. Check with your local phone 4 company to be sure it can complete the call for you. 4 Have these facts ready before you call: Model Year Model Name Mileage Major Options Number of Cylincers Condntion 1-900-258-2886 473 APPENDIX D FISCAL YEAR 1991-1992 BUDGET EXCERPT CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND CLASSIFICATION OF BUDGETED PROJECTS BY REVENUE PROGRAM CATEGORIES 818191 . New and Rebudgetsd Major Projects A. Recla r don Plant 1 1. Wastehaular [lap 6 Sample Stn Pi-27-11213 2. Primary Claiflers Nos. 6-16, P1-33 3. Gas Handgng Facilides, Pi-34-1 4. Sludge Handling FeoSides, Pi-34.2 S. Digesters 11-16. P1-34-3 S. Rehab of Digesters 9 IL 10. P1-35-2 7. Secondary Trmt Expandon to 80 MOD, P1-38 8. Primary Treatment 72 MGD Expansion, P1.37 -�(C 8. Miso. ModiOaadon, P1-38 10. Security 6 Landscaping, P1-38-1 11. Earthquake Work, P1.38.2 12. Selsmic Upgrading 6 Struct Work, PI.38.3 13. Fuel System Improvements, R-033-1 14.40 MOD Oxygen Activated Sludge 6 OAPs 15. Bait Nests@ (4 Udtsl 16. Solids Storage 14 Sins) 17. Digesters: 2 0 110' Diameter IS. Standby Power 0snsrsdon 19. 12kv Electrical Power Distribution 20. Electrification Project 21. Raw Sewage Emergency Bypass 22. Rome" TrlddIng Filters / 6 3 23. Central Alf Compressor Station 24. Misc. Projects �L 25. Other Master Plan Projects 7� a. Menitortng 6 Control System. 1992 b. Headworke No. 1 Rebuild. 2003 o. Headworks No.2 Impetlsr/Pump Speed, 2016 d. Remove Trickling Filters 2 6 4. 2007 a. 40 Mgd Oxygen Act'd Studge 6DAF, 2017 f.11O It Olgesters, 2003 &.2012 C. 4 Belt Presses, 2004 h. 12 KV Power Distribution, 2001-2012 I. Standby Power Generation. 2009 6 2015 j. 72 Mgd Primary Treatment. 2004 6 2012 SU13-TOTAL - RECLAMATION PLANT 1 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND CLASSIFICATION OF BUDGETED PROJECTS BY REVENUE PROGRAM CATEGORIES SCHECULE 11.2 FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 Page 1 Sc Q I E f ! PERCENTAGE A ON 1991-92 U ET YEA ROUGH 020 IMPROVED REPLACEMNT ADDITIONAL REQUIRED REPLACEMNT IMPROVED ADDITIONAL REV TOTAL REPLACEMNT IMPROVED ADDITIONAL 6 TREATMENT CAPACITY BUDGET & TREATMENT CAPACITY PROJECT EST 6 TREATMENT CAPACITY RECONSTR 1991-92 RECONSTR TO 2020 RECONSTR 50.00% 50.00% 50.000 25.000 25.000 2.120,000 1.060.000 1,060.000 100.00% 4.000.000 4.000.000 42.700,000 42,700.000 20.00% 00.00% 4,000.000 600,000 3,200,000 14,850.000 2.970.000 11.880,000 50.00% 50.00% 1,100.000 550.000 550.000 22,000.000 11,000.000 11.000.000 100.00% 12.000,000 12.000.000 20.500,000 ` 26.SOO.000 100.00% 2.000.000 2.000.000 3.900,000 3,900.000 40.00% 60.00% 3.000.000 1,200.000 1.800,000 39,800,000 15.920,000 23,890,000 100.00% 1.000.000 1,000.000 34,100,000 34.100,000 100.00% 500.000 500,000 11.020,000 11.020,000 100.00% 500.000 500.000 1.510.000 1.510.000 100.00% 400.000 400.000 4.920.000 4.920.000 100.00% 1.000.000 1.000.000 15.100.000 15,100.000 100.00% 25.000 25,000 85.000 85.000 100.00% 70.000.000 70.000.000 100.00% 15.000.000 15.000,000 100.00% 11.000,000 11.000,000 100.00% 9.200.000 9,200.000 100.00% 8.300.000 8,300.000 100.00% 3.800.000 3.800.000 100.00% 3.000.000 3.000.000 100.00% 2.000.000 2.000.000 100.00% 1.000.000 1.000,000 50.00% 50.00% 50.000 25.000 25,000 250,000 129.000 125.000 60.00% 20A0% 20.00% 1.000.000 600,000 200,000 200.000 10,250.000 6.150,000 2,050.000 2,050,000 100.00% 5.070,000 5.070.000 50.00% 50.00% 14,950.000 7,475,000 7.475.000 50.00% 50.00% 2.600,000 1.300.000 1,300,000 50.00% 50.00% 1.300,000 650,000 650,000 100.00% 34.000.000 34.000,000 100.00% 18.200.000 18.200.000 50.00% 50.00% 10.920.000 5,460.000 5,400,000 100.00% 1.099,000 1.099,000 100.00% 4.914.000 4.914.000 100.00% 32,500,000 32,500,000 30,62S.000 si,000.wo 2,925.0001 22.900.000 1 L 477 958 000 48.160.000 1 83 255 000 346,543,000 CORF4A92.XLS 11.52 AM 5/8191 518/91 A REPLACE! 8 B. Treatment Plant 2 1. Support Facilities and Site knprovemants a. Operations SuMng. P2-23.5.1 b. Warehouse Bufldtng, P235.2 100.0 a. Maintenance Building, 152-35.3 100.01 d. Construction Management Office, 132-35-4 100.0 a. Phase R She; Security Iran., P2.35.5 100.0 2. Mko Mod, i knprov. to Feolifties, P2-37 100.04 3. Rehab Digester I, J. K. P2-39-1 100.01 4. Rehab Digester L. M, P2-39-2 100.0 S. Rehab Digester N. O. 12239-3 100.04 S. Prfinery Treatment 24 MOO Expansion, P2-4/- 7. Secondary Trestmam Expanson. P2-42-2 S. Equipment Prepurchase, P2-42-2A 9. Electrification Pm).c% P2.42-1 10. Priority Kee. Mod. i Quake Work, P2-43.1 50.0 11.8efemic Upgrading i Struct. Work, P2.43-2 50.01 12. Mfso. Modfffcations A Quake Work. P2-43.3 50.01 13. ModtorfrvXontrol System. P2.44 50.0; 14. Fuel System krnprowments, R-033.2 100.0C 15. Standby Power Generation 16. Solids Storage: 2 Bins 17. Additional 105 Foot Digester 1 S. Potable Water DistrRrotion System IOO.00 19. Plant Water Pump Station 20. Mise. Projects SOAC 21. Other Master Plan Projects a. Overflow Pump Station, 1990 b. Replace Pdmry Basins A. B. C. 2008 7S.00 o. Standby Power Generation, 2005 6 2015 d. Monitoring and Contra System, 2005 50.00 SUB -TOTAL -TREATMENT PLANT 2 CORF4A92.XLS CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND CLASSIFICATION OF BUDGETED PROJECTS BY REVENUE PROGRAM CATEGORIES FISCAL YEAR 1991.92 g € E g if SCHEDULE 8-2 Page 2 INT IR IMPROVED TREATMENT ADDITIONAL CAPACITY REQUIRED BUDGET 1991-92 1.92 WDGET REPLACEMNT & RECONSTR YIA4RO IMPROVED TREATMENT ADDITIONAL CAPACITY REV TOTAL PROJECT EST TO 2020 G REPLACEMNT rb RECONSTR 020 IMPROVED TREATMENT ADDITIONAL CAPACITY 100.00% 1.500,000 1,5001000 2,7SO.000 2,750.000 % 500.000 500,000 4,075,000 4.075,000 % 1.000.000 1.000.000 3,575,000 3.575.000 525,000 525.000 % 100.000 100.000 2.305,000 2.305,000 % 50.000 30.000 8,158.000 8.158.000 % 4.000.000 4.000.000 5,300.000 S.30O.ODD % 1.000,000 1.000.000 5.000.000 5.000.000 % 5.000.000 5.000,000 100.00% 15,000,000 15.000,000 75.00% 25.00% 1.000.000 750,000 250.000 25.200,000 18.900.000 6.300.000 7SAO% 25.00% 2.000,000 1.500,000 500.000 3,000.000 2,250.000 750,000 1OOA0% 6.000,000 6.000.000 11,000,000 11.000.000 % 50.00% 500,000 250.000 250,000 3,025.000 1.512.500 1.512.500 % 50.00% 1.000.000 5001000 500,000 15.050.000 7,525.000 7.925.000 % 50.009L 1.500.000 750.000 750.000 3.520.000 1,760,000 1,760,000 % 50.00% 3.500,000 1.750,000 1,750,000 4,040.000 2.020.000 2.020,000 % 501000 50.000 175.000 175.000 •100.00% 0.200.000 9,200.000 100.00% 5,200.000 5.200,000 100.00% 4,000.000 4,000,000 4.350.000 4.350,000 160.00% 1.200.000 1.200,000 % 20.00% 20.00% 1,000,000 600,000 200.000 200.000 10,400,000 6,240.000 2,080,000 2,080,000 100.00% 250.000 250.000 % 25.00% 11.700,000 8.775.000 2,925,000 100.00% 16.120.000 18.120,000 % 50•00% 520 000 260,000 280 000 24.700.000 10,550,000 3,950,0001 10,200,0001 179 639 OOO 66 565 SOO 3 612,5001 43, 69 4�O00 11:52 AM 5/8191 IL 518/91 C. Rademation Plant Sim 1. Site Acquisition ' A REPLACED a RECONS' 2. Redamnlon Plant 3 SUS -TOTAL - RECLAMATION PLANTS D. Interplant and Joint Facilities 1. Interplant Fealtes. 1-9 a. 120' Interplant 9ns 10.0 b. Interplant Utility Chase 20.0 o. Industrial Water Uns 50.0 d. Digester Gas Line 50.0 a. Coeranwnications Come 50.0 2. Support FmOtles and Site krrprovaments a. Admin. Bldg. Expen. a Rehab., J-7.4aS 10.0 b. Convert Exst Lab to Office @P1,J-11-1 50.0 o. Central Laboratory, J-17 d. OpsradonsMontrol Center, J-23-1 50.0 a. Computer Equipment, J-23-2 f. Personnel Building at Pit 1. J-28 Q. Demolition of Old Control Center 100.0 h. Demolition of Support Btdg.@P2, J-27 10O.0 3. Central Generation Fee9fty, a. Equipment Prepurchase, J-19A SO.0 b. Emisslon Purchase, J-198 50.0 o. Plant 1 Facility. J-19.1 50.0 d. Plant 2 FaaHky, J-19.2 50.0 4. Wane Gas Flares. J-21. J-21A 5. Outfan a Booster Pump Stations a. Replaoa 78' Outfsll Sewn. J-22-1(Land) b. Repl. Outfa9 No. 1 Lard Ssctlon,J-22.2 a. Now Surge Tower No. 1. J-22-3 d. Temp C12 Station for Outfall No. 1 e. Second Discharge 14soder GOBS 'C' 70.0 f. Ext. 78• to Deep Water W/20' Outfall 6. MRuent Flowrrmter a Ten Fsc9.,J-24/A/B 100.0 7. Preparation of Utility Adss. J-25 100.0 S. Telephone/Telematry/Monitorin0 Expansion 50.0 9. Buahard Mterpiant Trunk Replacement 90.0 10. Electrical Power Systems Rehab. Studies 100.0 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND CLASSIFICATION OF BUDGETED PROJECTS BY REVENUE PROGRAM CATEGORIES FISCAL YEAR 1991.92 P 9 E S SCHEDULE B•2 Page 3 ti K cr4l uV rnv 99 -92 up ROU 020 INT IMPROVED ADDITIONAL REQUIRED REPLACEMNT IMPROVED ADDITIONAL REV TOTAL REPLACEMNT IMPROVED ADDITIONAL TREATMENT CAPACITY BUDGET a TREATMENT CAPACITY PROJECT EST a TREATMENT CAPACITY 'R 1991-92 RECONSTR TO 2020 RECONSTR 50.00% 50.00% 51000.000 2.500.000 2.500.000 5.000.000 2.500.000 2.500.000 50.00% 50.00% 100,000 50.000 50.000 61.000.000 30,500.000 30,500.000 5 100 000 2 SSO 000 21550,000 68,000.000 33,000,000 33 000.000 I% 00.00% 14.000.000 1.400.000 12.600.000 28.600.000 2.660.000 23,940,000 I% $0.00% I% 50.00% 500.000 250.000 250.000 820.000 410,000 410.000 I% 50.00% 500.000 250.000 250.000 1.020.000 510.000 510,000 1% SO.00% 100.000 50,000 50.000 130,000 65,000 65.000 1% 10.00% 80.00% 400.000 40.000 40,000 320.000 7,500.000 750.000 750.000 6.000.000 1% 50.00% 50.000 25,000 25.000 2,062.000 1.031,000 1.031.000 100.00% 3,200,000 3.200.000 9.000,000 9,000,000 1% 50.00% 3.130.000 1.565.000 1.505.000 3.675.000 1.837,500 1,837.500 100.00% 300.000 300.000 1.300.000 1.300,000 1% 1% 100.00% 200,000 200,000 1.110.000 450,000 80.000 450.000 80.000 1.110.01)0 1% 50.00% 2.000.000 1.000.000 1.000,000 24.861,000 12.425.500 12.425,500 1% 50.00% 3.724.000 1.862,000 1,862,000 1% 50.00% 10.400.000 5.200.000 5.200,000 15.800,000 7.900,000 7.900.000 1% 50.00% 7.000.000 3,500.000 3.500.000 23.350.000 11.675,000 11.875,000 100.00% 350,O00 350.000 848.000 649.000 100.00% 1.000.000 1.000.000 3.1 / 2.000 3.112.000 100.00% SOO.000 500.000 2.000.000 2.000.000 100.00% 3.300.000 3.300,000 100.00% 2.600,000 2.600.000 1% 30.00% 4.400.000 3.080,000 1.320.000 100.00% 50.000,000 50.000,000 I% 50.000 50.000 700.000 700.000 1% 500.000 500.000 3.300.000 3,300.000 1% 50.00% 200.000 100.ODo 100.000 800.000 400.000 400,000 1% 20.00% 33.000.000 28.400,000 6.600,000 1% 2.000,000 2.000.000 CORF4A92.XLS 11:52 AM 518191 5/8191 n I REPLACEI � 8 11. Sludge Disposal Projects a. Compost Dsmonsbatian Ptah b. Land Acquisition 50.0 a. Landfill Development Phase 1 50.0 d. Compost Facility 12. District Information Management Network e. Maintenance • Opar MVnnt Computer Systarn b. Lab Intonation Management System o. Purohashglinventory Control System 50.0 d. AccountinglFinands! Intonation System 50.0 a. Existing LAN Syetan Uparedes d. Network Llnkege Feaftlas 13. Emissions Controls:113 MW Emarg Generators 14. Mae Projects 60.0 15.Other Master Plan Projects a. Replace 78. Outfell with 120. 2009 50.0 b. Expand OOBS •C• to North 2019 50.0 a. Sludge Ofsp. Landfill Phase n 2011 50.0 d. Sludge Ofsp. Equip Phase I.5 2001 SUBTOTAL - INTERPLANT & JOINT SUBTOTAL - MAJOR PROJECTS 2. Spacial Projects, Studles i Research A. Aatlon Plan: 1. NPOES Permit Application 2. implementation - TOM B. Solids Treatment Disposal and Reuse C. Deap Ocean Disposal Evaluation D. Air Quality Control Program . 1. Air Toxics inventory (AB2589 wl PEEP) 2. VOCIROG BACT Demonstration Program E. Water Conservation end Redone an R&D Projects SUBTOTAL - SPECIAL PROJECTS 3. Egndpmen Items + 20.0 TOTAL JOINT WORKS CAPITAL REQ CORF4A92.XLS CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND CLA8SIFICATioN OF BUDGETED PROJECTS RY REVENUE PROGRAM CATEGORIES FISCAL YEAR 1991.92 B E g ti j SCHEDULE 8-2 Pepe 4 %LM V 1 - Huyl XQZu INT IMPROVED ADDITIONAL REQUIRED REPLACEMNT IMPROVED ADDITIONAL REV TOTAL REPLACEMNT IMPROVED ADDITIONAL TREATMENT CAPACITY BUDGET i TREATMENT CAPACITY PROJECT EST & TREATMENT CAPACITY rR 1991-92 RECONSTR TO 2020 RECONSTR 50.00% 50.00% 91000,000 4.500,000 4,500.000 1% 50.00% 24,000.000 12.000.000 12.000.000 I% 50.00% 28.600.000 14.300.000 14.300.000 50.00% 50.00% 50.360.000 25.180.000 25.180.000 100.00% g00,000 900.0o0 900.000 900,000 100.00% 750.000 760.000 750,000 750,000 1% 25.00% 25.00% 421.000 210.500 105,250 105.250 421,000 210.1100 105,250 105,250 1% 25.00% 28.00% 500.000 250.000 125.000 125.000 500,000 250.000 125.000 125.000 100.00% 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 100.00% 150.000 150.000 150.000 150.000 50.00% 50.00% 700.000 350.000 350,000 1.200,000 600.000 600,000 1% ".Do% 20.00% 1.o00,000 600,000 200.000 200.000 10.200.000 6,120,000 2,040,000 2.040.000 1% 50.00% 20.280.000 10.140.000 10.140.000 1% 50.00% 27.125,000 13,562.500 13.562,500 % 50.000A 15.600.000 7,800.000 7,800.000 50.00% 50A0% 11.550AM 5.775.000 5.775.000 49.001,000 14.990,500 5.270.250 28,740.250 428.168.000 141.919.000 49,645,250 236,603.750 109,428,000, 30.540.500 14,595,250 04.290.250 1,151,764,000 256,634,500 209 512 750 685 616 750 100.00% 45.000 45.000 265.000 265,000 100.00% 2001000 200.000 500.000 500.000 100.00% 100,000 100.000 1,130.000 1,130.000 100.00% 50.000 50.000 1,529.000 1.529.000 3.SOO.000 100.00% 200.000 200.000 1,242.000 1.242.000 100.00% 200.000 200.000 550.000 550.000 100.00% 400.000 400.000 a 15o 000 3.150.000 850,000 950 ODO 11,101,000 7,601,000 3,744,000 748,800 1.872.000 1 123 200 44 819 000 8 963 900 22 409 Sao 13 445 700 % 50.00% 30.00% 114 120 000 31 289 300 17 417 250 65 413 450 1 207 684 000 265 598 300 239 523 250 699 062 450 11:52 AM 5/8191 0 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9270E-701B (7141540-2910 1714) 962-2411 RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS DECEMBER 11, 1991 - 7:30 P.M. D G7 m Z Cd m 3 00 _w A r r tl ,--1 Cn --I Cl C/) t D N hD hC , 9199 - 41 DIST 1CRKIRG CAPITAL FPOCESSING DATE 10/3n/91 PAGF i REPORT NUMBER AF43 COUNTYA TATiON DISTRICTS OF ORANS�j `QQUNTY ' CLAIMS PAID 11/06/91 POSTING DATE 11/06/91 3 ' WARRANT NO, VENDOR AMOUNT _DESC.RIP.TION . ' 117944 ACGIHv INC. $43.52 PUBLICATION • 7945 ASP ANA S .On ENGINE OIL ANALYSIS ' 117946 ACCURATE PETALLURGICAL SERVICE $1*950.00 ALUMINUM & STAINLESS • 117947 ACVARCO CCNSTRUCTORS IKC $194209802.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-34-2 ' 1 948 AMER SCCI TY OF CIVT NGR s .00 PUBLICATIONS 0 117949 AMER SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGR $345.00 TRAINING REGISTRA'I'YC " 117950 ANTHEM LIFE INSURANCE S14.000.00 STOP LOSS INSURANCE '3 117951 RCBCO IhC R/OR AP R CAN c A S s9 5.89 _ VALVE PARTS 13 117952 ARAHEIM SEWER CCNSTRUCT.ICN $49916.25 SEWER REPAIRS LIST 2 " •117953 BLAKE P ANDERSCh S59.67 TELEPHONE EXPENSE RE 'S 117954 ANGELUS FACIFIC CO$ .14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 117955 ANTHONY•S MECH R MACHINE• INC. $444.30 RACFIINE RSPAfR$ " 117956 APCO VALVE 9 FRIMER CORP $111.55 VALVE " 117957 A-PLLS SYSTEMS S5 26.12 NOTICES_& ADS " 117958 ARATEX SERVICES INC S8*506.64 71NIFOi2N REN'cAL§ 117959 AMSA $150.10 TRAINING REGISTRATIC 3' 7960 BC ANALYTICAL $2-t-00 SERVICES '3 1179CI FALCCN DISPOSAL SERVICE S1069414.42 __LAB RESIDUALS REHOVAL R. 33 117962 EACKFLOY PREVENTION DEVICE S192.00 BACRFLOW TESTING " 7963 BAKAhA EL PR E BLUEPRINTING SERVICE t3 117964 BARCLAYS LAW PUBLISHERS S284.96 PUBLICATIONS 70 117965 BANTER DIAGNOSTICS INC $39815.31 LAB SUPPLIES " 966 BEACON A ENTERPRISES CAR WASH COUPONS „ 117967 BEARD/PROVENCHER E ASSOC INC 1500.OP FLOW VESTING SERVICE " 117968 BERTECH $525.96 INSTRUMENT PARTS b 117969 BLAST ELECTRIC K $ TRUCK PART 117970 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP S319492.76 SERVICES 32 117971 BROWN 9 CALDWELL CONSULTING s30*729.83 ENGINEERING SERVICE: 117972 ST V N = CONSTRUCTION M.0.9-1 3' 117973 BUILEER"S EMPORIUM S207.82 HARDWARE/LUHBER--. 117974 7PE BUREIL CF RATIONAL AFF $59.67 PUBLICATIONS 36 117975 GARY G STREED S3 . 5 PETTY CASH REIMBURSE 37 117976 CS COMPANY S41.02 VALVE 3' 117977 CAL -GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. S44.9£+ LAB SUPPLIES a 117978 CALTROL INC S3 594.92 l--- MECHANICAL PARTS AN <o 127979 CALPELRA 5225.0P CONFERENCE REGISTRAI 1179PO CALOS CAPERAS9 INC. S196.44 CAMERA '3 117981 CAPITAL LESTWARC S2449,27 REGULATOR i3 117982 JOHN CARCLLO ENGINEERS S1909168.29 RrNG -SERVICES 117983 CENTURY SAFETY INST R SUFP s830.82 SAFETY SUPPLIES .� 117984 DICK CEpEK INC 554.74 TRUCK PARTS '• 117985 CHRCPE CFAhKSHAF7 IhC s360.00 MECHANICAL' REPAIRS 117986 CIAO BELLA CATERING $779.34 DIRECTORS' MEETING E '• 117987 CLEMENT COMMUNICATIONS INC s5 .90 SUBSCRIPTION 117988 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $112.42 -SAFET1r3t PLIES- -� 30 e� 117989 COLICH ARD SONS S139qp200.00 CONSTRUCTION I-9 u u x v STEEL TESTING P1-35-2 N- - - ... - --- IMBURSEMENT N 0.7=13=88 " S 10-10-90 14 =1, - J-17 -- -- - P2-23-5, P2-35-2,3,4 1-91 MENT ION _ 11=17- I=9;- P1-36- - XPENSE C7 m Z t= D m 3 zhz UO r r t� C/) —I C—) FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WCPKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 17/3t/41 FACE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANIZATIoN nlSTRTCTfZ OF $AN G!`C.D U_N f Y — ' ° CLAIMS PAID 11/06/91 POSTING DATE 11/06/91 ' T --DESCRIPTION ' 117990 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $7+585.32 PUMP PARTS e117991 CnVPVYrR RAY 109A�ApINSTRUMENT PARTS -----TRUCK 117992 COhNELL (P PARTS / CIV s138.50 PARTS ° 117953 CCN•►AY 1ES7ERN EXFRESS $46.71 FREIGHT CHARGES +117994 caNsCiIDAIED ELECTRICAL nlsT s��7.p�Zg ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 10 117995 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC 53+026.49 TOOLS " 117996 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO $8+566.14 CHLORINE M.O.10-11- 17 117927 CCKTRAC70P#SRE 174.Ru PUBLICATION " 117998 CCSTA MESA ACTC SUPPLY s35.62 ---TRUCK REPAIR " 117999 CCUNCIL Ch EDUCATICN $350001 TRAINING REGISTRATI + 118000 CHEMICAL OCESSORS INC s2.o72.63 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ° 118001 HORNET FOLNOATION INC S160.88 FIANUALS " 118002 DAMES 6 MCCRE S2.176.02 GEOTECHNICAL SERVIC • 7B VALVE '+ 110004 OECUS 3690.nO TRH AEGiSTAATi !0 118005 OEIURIK AND/CR CS CO 5192.92 HARDWARE „ CHEMICALS a IIF007 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES 554.95 PRINTING n 118008 OCRACC ENTERPRISES INC 5550.n0 PLANT MAINTENANCE & 118009 - 6�y GRIT LIFT 118010 D•VALS SALES 5245.88 S t6 118011 ERCE - SAN DIEGO 31*900.00 LAB SERVICES t�118012 EASTFAN INC 16.13A, A OFFICE SUPPLIES to 118013 EPERALD SYSTEMS 5590.09 -OCEAN 79 118014 ENCHANTER INC $4.900.00 MONITORING OCEAN MONITORING M. st6� LAB SERVICES 01 118016 ENVIRONMENTS WEST INC $2+700.00 ERZNGSERVICE sa 118017 FACILITIES SUPPORT CO $101.46 TOOLS ENSTEIN PE s3.29Q.➢L_ CONSTRUCTION SERVIC " 118019 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP $628.75 -AZA FREIGHT- - 11P020 FERRELLGAS $25.52 PROPANE x 8 H R EF CO 52,290•Q2 CHLORINATION PARTS 01 118022 FLICKINGER CO 51+301.77 '° 118023 FLC-SYSTEMS S2.269.48 PUMP PARTS 30 118024 CLIFFCRC. A FCRKFR7 16.66Q•On ENGINEERING SERVICE 40 118025 FOXBCRO CC / MAG SYSTEMS $2.0l -FREIGHT 11 118026 FREDSON PY SUPPLY 545.73 TRUCK PARTS <= 118027 GANAHL LUMBER CO s15�:@,Q HARDWARE/LUMBER 43 11802R GENERAL TELEPHONE CO _ $3.744.39 TELEPHONE -SERVICES 118029 GECRCE LEECH a ASSOCIATES s329:19 ELECTRIC PARTS .s NC S71.4]I.i� MBCHANICAL PARTS 118031 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS 5489.35 118032 GREAT PACIFIC EQUIPMENT CO. 5454.77 TRUCK PARTS 116033 <. �� HAH CCFFANY $1.839.4^ CHEMICALS 118034 HARRING7CA IRCUSTRIAL FLASTI $6.324.07 --- ALVSB & HARDWARE- 70 118035 s� HELGA PASS S1.800.0n DEFERRED COMP WITHE ss so . 39 )N ;S )N . REPAIRS ).7-17-91 _. _. ___ ES J-7-4, J-7-5 s M.0.6-12-91 RAWAL D G7 m t7 m 3 4t CID ;I D r r C C/) -I C') C/) ID NC 9199 - JT GIST Y(RKING CtFITAL FROCESSING DATE Ll)/3u/91 FAcE REPORT NUMBER AF-43 GCUAIT_ IANITAILCN_D- SIRIGIS_OE_CRAN.GL.-COUNTY_ _____ _.. . CLAIMS PAID 11/06/91 POSTING DATE 11/06/91 ARANT N0. _ VENO0 A CkUNL---.-_..___ ___DLSCRIPTION 118036 PL FAYN CO INC S79.33 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1IR037 HILIj-Il1C__ IAoAl0.96_. _.__ _ TOOLS 118038 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF INC $721.30 MECHANICAL PARTS 118039 J.T. HORVATH 9 ASSOC. 539000.0P CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, J-7-4 11P0l0 HOUSE -OF AITERIES____ _.__.._._.__-..-.__9756.56 _._._ ...... BATTERIES 11Po41 RS HLGI-E! CC INC _ 1657#16 BUILDING MATERIALS 1IF042 HUPBCLOT STATE UNIVERSITY $67.35 PUBLICATION 11RDA.3 HUNIUL COP EUR.AIlON ____ 5833a658.00-_______ CONSTRUCTION J-19-1 118044 CITY. OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $189014.25 WATCR USE 118045 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STA S121.01 OFFICE SUPPLIES -LIM6 _HUNI INGItN_S11PPLY _ -5241436__._..__ _ HARDWARE IIF047 HLNTINGICN VALLEY SCNYINN C __. 5192.9E BICYCLE PARTS 11e048 HYDRACON CCMFANY s577.R5 LAB SUPPLIES 11P.049 1_"-1NOUSlRlAL_CIIRP.- 15*258.53-____ ._ _ ___ CHEMICALS 118050 IMO INDUSTRIES S559.19 RLBCTFtIC SUPPLIES 118051 ISCC INC S9.939.94 BATTERY 11fl09? 1l.PE.RIAL-1ES7__CNEMICAI 140.723.27-...-_._ __.__ _ FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O. 11-14-90 118053 INDUSTRIAL II`READEO PRCCUCTS __ 519861.47 CONNECTORS 118054 INGRAM PAPER SR2.75 PAPER PRODUCTS IIROSS INSIDE E-F-A- SUBSCRIPTION 118056 INTRONICS• INC. S302.90 CDRPUTER SGFTFIARE 11P057 GREAT 6ESIERN SANITARY SUPP S950.59 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 118t58 0ANIC_.JERKINS R aSS0r INC__ 130983.65-_________._-_.._. TRAINING REGISTRATION 118059 JENSEN TOOLS INC S127.63 TbUL 118060 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $664099 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 1190R1 rAgir p JORGENSEN t10316689 METAL VIDEO -PRODUCTION 118062 KEN BERRY FRCEUCTIONS $19420.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES 11eef! KALLEENIS CCPFL;TER PROCLC7S S207.15 TOOLS 11A E4 KANER_COtPIINY.- -.�--_ _.--30.08 BUILDING MATERIALS I18065 KAR PRODLCTS $343.25 TEMPORARY SERVICES 118066 KELLY SERVICES 11*905.65 MACHINE SUPPLIES 11806E �KING__BEARING__INC__.__.__._-_ ._ ____..__ __ __ __.____._i875.?4 _ GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES 118068 KLEINFELCER S39234.77 118069 KNCX INCLSTRIAL SUFPLIES S3034.92 TOOLS CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 118.070 MLRIIN_KCROlCK__ PUMP PARTS 11P071 LA LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS S935.39 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-33 118072 LEE R RC CONSULTING ENGR S9.982.00 SERVICES 11ae73 le Rc>_ERANCALL_R__ASSOC ___.ENGINEERING CYLINDER REPAIRS IIP014 LIFECCM-SAFE7Y SERVICE SL'P►L S275.00 , 118075 THE cOHN LINER ORGANIZATION SR7.0@ SUBSCRIPTION 11HA36 _ SERVICE AGREEMENT 11R077 _lOFPJN_PBOOUCIS -_ - MBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL __ __-_-S1s251.37_-_- 1400.00 _._._ LAB SERVICES PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 11807R MPS S310.P6 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 11EDIC MACOL-CO-_--___-_ _S372.45____.___ ELECTRIC'MOTORS 1180e0 MAGNETEK NATICFAL ELECTRIC $707.20 MECHANICAL PARTS 11ecel PAINIENANCE PRODUCTS INC $39543#40 D m Z d --1 m 3 4t 00 I, D t- r CJ r-� Cn C" 7 -1 C/) I Zr FUND NC 9199 - JT CIST WCRKING CAPITAL -VENDOR PROCESSING DATF 10/3P/91 RAGF REPORT NUMBER. AP43 UhTY-SANITATION-OISTR-ICIS OF- ORANGE- COUNTY -.--- -.__ CLAIMS PAID I1/06/91 POSTING OATE I1/06/91 MOUNT--------__.. _ __ ---- _ _ __ DESCRIPTION 118082 NARVAC ELECTRONICS f408.89 11"8• r-C-CARRY-CENTRAL--TYPEYR"C-R--I-- 118084 MCKENNA ENGR R EQUIP $69390.65 118085 MIDLAND PFG CORP S1T3.75 11808r. M-1LLL4-ONICS- ---- - ---------S2r35t.A6--.-_.---- 118087 FIFE SAFETY APFLIAACE.S CC f4r6R4.lA 1i808A PISSICN AERASIVE SUPFLIES Sir230.31 118t89 JAMES-M-M.C-AIGCFERY------------------- 53,743.34--_ _ _ ... 118090 JAMES M MONTGOMERY S39062.07 110091 MONTROY SUPPLY CO $64.93 1-180 42 MOOR 1 R C D U C1 S-C 0------------ ------ _- -s 19 2.8 7 - . 118093 PCRTCh SALT AAC/OR 5459.34 118094 MCTICh 1ACUSTRIES INC S760.39 t181'QS MOSDROLA--CELLULAR-SERVICES 3197.56-- .----- 118096 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES INC S29370.00 118097 NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFCRMATI s55.50 1180S8 GUST-_K--AEYBERG-COAST----CO-__-. .9T...-_ _. 119099 CITY OF hEWPCRT BEACH fA.25 11R100 DOOR IEN ENERGY SYSTEMS S1094R5.03 IIAI I_ - OCCUFAI1OAAl lSION__SERVICES 4L409.14. ___-_ 118102 OFFICE PAVILION/INTERIOR RES S949.06 118103 DX SYSTEPS CO S389995.23 11.18-4 n RANGE-C.0 UAT-Y--C V E R I CA L-LO ------51� A3 6.D 1-------- 118105 ORANGE CCUNTY FARM SUPPLY C $312.41 118106 OXYGEN SERVICE S19459.32 I I A107 CoUNIY OEFLANGE- S4"34.-00 - 118108 COUNTY SANITATICN DISTRICT 1695P6.17 118309 PSCCIPOCL SUPPLY OF OC1 S95.70 -URI10 PACIFIC-PCHILE__CEEICES- 118111 PACIFIC FARTS $29012.43 118112 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO s10941.66 11g11It PAC1E1C,EELL --S449.62-- ...___ 118114 PACTEL CELLULAR S224.05 118115 PACTEL PEPIOIAN SYSTEMS s77.?8 "llA _ PAK__WEST_ ---_ ---------....-.--.-__--S2r178.71_...--- 118117 PARAGON CABLE S28.36 118118 PEAT PARWICK MAIN 6 CO $59000.00 IIA119 PEBGAPON-ERESS-.-iNC -_ -S299.00.-.---__ .---- 118120 PERSONNEL JCURNAL 550.4P 118121 FIFA GRC SYSTEPS INC $1009522.35 11 P122 FIT.NEY__BCWE.S______.- 118123 POLYMETRICSr INC. $19718088 118124 POLYPURE INC S279984.15 1191125 POWER TRACK _-INC.-----...-_------___-- 118126 F+ARCLC FRIPRCSE ICE 5231.00 118127 PRCFESSIChAL SERVICE IhO. s49272.CC INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES _ _OFFICE MACHINE PUMP PARTS CHLORINATION PARTS INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES SAFETY SUPPLIES HARDWARE ENGINEERING SERVICES ENGINEERING SERVICES 14.0.6-1J-90 OFFICE SUPPLIES INSTRUMENT PARTS SALT MECHANICAL PARTS CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES VACUUM SERVICES PUBLICATION CONSTRUCTION P1-33 WATER USE INTERIM POWER GEN. SYST. M.0.3-8-89 SAFETY GLASSES ---OFFICE FURNITURE CHLORINE M.0.2-14-90 CHEMICALS LANfiSCAPING_ SUPPLIES SPECIALTY GASSES DATA PROCESSING SERVICES - REIMBURSE'WORKERS COMP INSURANCE_._ GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES MOBILE OFFICE REPAIRS INSTRUMENT PARTS SAFETY SUPPLIES TELEPHONE SERVICES - - CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS JANITORIAL SUPPLIES CABLE SERVCCES AUDITING SERVICES M.0.3-13-91 SUBSCRIPTION SUBSCRIPTION RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 POTAGE METER LEASE - EQUIPMENT RENTALS CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-87 PUMP PARTS - - ICE.. ._.._ _ SOIL TESTING 0 NC 9199 - JT DIST YfRKIAG CAPITAL PROCESSING OATF 10/3C/91 PAGE REPORT NUPBER AP43 U�TY_SAN1]�►I]Cd�tS]R1GIS._OE_06ANGE_COUNTY_ _,__...__ _ CLAIMS PAID 11/06/91 POSTING DATE 11/06/Ql DESCRIPTION 118128 THE FRO ECT SOLUTIONS CO INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O.7-17-91 ° 11P129 e . QUALITY E 'ILCING S _ 14•T20.0� BUILDING MATERIALS ' 118130 QUARTERDECK OFFICE SYSTEMS V $448.83 COMPUTER SOFTWARE ' 118131 RAININ INSTRUMENT C0.9 INC $632965 LAB SUPPLIES • __ 118132 RECYCINC f46r322•Q3 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-13-91 10 11R133 PBCC CORE R RECLIKE ENT _ _ f180.OP STREET SWEEPING " 118134 RED VALVE CC 1KC s745.41 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 't 118135 RED PING SHOES 1120.64 SAFETY SHOES 118136 REMEDY TEMP $4 98810 73 TEMPORARY SERVICES " 11e137 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CC $19403.95 VALVE PARTS A '+ 116138 J R ROBERTS $3242864990__-_ CONSTRUCTION J-17 1° 11P139 J R RCBERIS CCRP - _ _"_ - _. s54,I90.A0 CONSTRUCTION J=23=1 Z " 116140 LAYRERCE 1 ROSINE CO 51,322.00 FLOORING INSTALLATION t= '"- 118141 ROYCE INSTRUMENT s67,°18 INSTRUMENT PARTS " 118142 RYAN-HERCC i331.76 FITTINGS 7O 118143 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP S161050 PARTS CLEANER 11P1.44 1Y S FPLY OF AMERIC.A s149.96 _. _ SAFETY SUPPLIES rt'I " 118145 _SAF _ I SCCRP SARTCRIIJS C€ —._. 5360.00 LAB SERVICES 3 138146 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT°L f709401.06 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-12-91 118147 SECURITY SPECIALISTS f14sl5•B2 SECURITY EQUIPMENT � n 118148 SHAMROCK SUPPLY S568.83 ELECTRIC -SUPPLIES 1° 118149 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO i19303.33 LAB SUPPLIES 1 ?, 18 5 KYPARK ALK-IN MECICAL C!1 s_58..Q0 � PHYSICAL EXAMS "- 78 116151 SLIDE MASTER S244.74 PRESENTATION AIDS �79 118152 SMITH -EMERY CO $8.174.00 SOIL TESTING 7-17-91 I— 70 118153 SNAP -ON TCO S CORP 1211.8_2 TOOLS COMPUTER TiARDWAREjSOFTtifARE d_ �' 118154 COMPUSA• INC° $775.0? PBRMIT FEES 77 118155 SC CCAST AIR CCALITY 17.000.00 WATER USE 118156 SOUTH COA§ST Y"ER i _ _f81.3� — POWER mil' 118157 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO $119310.70 NATURAL GAS ;;o » 118158 SO CAL GAS CO 1616.02 ELECTRIC PARTS '--';; C7 118159 11e160 THE 7RAAE CCMPAAY THRCAIIL SCUEA CLTES CCC fJAL544-_Qf -- 1407065 1.. -DIESEL-FUEL " ---Im PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES �� 1lelfl SOUVENIR FFO70 s234.57 WELDING SUPPLIES 118162 YESTALLO_Y INC_ _ s9_4.39 -TOOLS -P-- •9 118163 STAR TOOL�L SUPPLY CO 1686.4C ART SUPPLIES •' 118164 STERLING ART f51.4P METAL •= 118165 SUMMIT STEEL 1354.49 —TRUCKAINING - •� 118IFE SUASET FCRD i154.73 TRAINING REGISTRATION REGISTRATION •• 118167 SYSTAT f55R.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE .s 118168 SYSTEMS_ERHANCEMENT CORP._ f904.OD.__`___.___ __� —� TRUCK -PARTS •• 118169 TECH SYSTEMS $19294.01 TELEPHONES •' 11P170 TELE-CELL• INC $19075.35 HARDWARE •' I1AI71 T_HOMFSOA IKDUSTRIAL SUFFLY 12�2�6.05—____-"". TRAVEL 9ERVICE9 M:O:6-12-91 •• 11e172 TRAVEL TRAVEL fl•116.50 TRUCK PARTS 50 I1P173 s ss s. TRUCK d AUTO SUPPLY INC f11.129.54 m d D m 3 Zit 00 i r r C/) C7 C/) FUND NC 9199 - JT DTST LCRKING CAPITAL C PROCESSING DATE 10/30/91 FAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 IINTY_.AN1IA_II.ON_DISIRICIS_Of._ORANGE_000NTY__. CLAIMS PAID 11/06/91 POSTING DATE 13/06/91 RRANT NC. —_..VEh!<OR __�____ AMOUNT .._ _ DESCRIPTION 118174 TUSTIN OCDGE S360.93 TRUCK PARTS 119175 TWINING--LA80RALORIES_DF 5258.-OO SOIL TESTING 118176 UNITED NCTTINGHAM 2215.50 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 118177 UNI7E0 PARCEL SERVICF 1308.63 PARCEL SERVICES .U-6138 US_EC.VERNtENI_BOCKSI.CRE_—_._-_. �___^ 560.00_ PUBLICATIONS 11R179 VYR SCIENTIFIC _ $59114.93 LAB SUPPLIES 118180 VALIN CORPORATION S73.93 MECHANICAL PARTS 118_181 VALLEy _CJ.IiESSUPPLY CO �1��59?,63 FITTINGS 118182 VANIER GRAPHICS S536.6q PAPER 118183 RCSEMCUNT INC S39814035 MECHANICAL PARTS .URI P VABIA"KiLylICAL_INIM U!'1LL11_ _ 24.1518.28 LAB SUPPLIES 1181A5 VERNCh PAVING CCPPANY _ .__ _ .._. $29575.00 PAVING SERVICES DIST 2 118186 VERTEX SYSTEMSS S11365.OQ COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT HAIR? VIKINB.—IADUSIRIAL__S_UPPLY S195�2L__.__ SUPPLIES 118188 VILLAGE NURSERIES ____..___.__SAFETY S31.25 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 118169 VIhCEh7 TRUCNE R THE LAY $49000000 CLAIM 11B1g0 CARL_YLRR.EN_S_LO__ _ __5559.46.—_. LIABILITY CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 1IR191 WESTERN �IGhWAY PRCDUCTS IN _____ $59286.74 SAFETY SUPPLIES 116192 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY S370591.09 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-8-90 11P123 WESC➢ —_1248.26_�_.._________. ELECTRIC PARTS 118194 ROURKE a WOODRUFF $709702.55 LEGAL SERVCIES M.0.10=10=90 1181S5 kERCk CORP 559212.01 COPIER LEASES 118196_ 2IEB.Afl1�ILALEER/�SaJILP.E+1_ _SZ05�b5I..00..__.-__.__ CONSTRUCTION P2-42-1 __-00p5TRUCTION 118197 21EBARTH AND ALPER S3469432.50 ----------------- P1=34=I TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 11/06/91 S5045*153.35 D G7 m zz d D m 3 4k 00 I, 3� r r tJ Cn -I C7 -I D I v FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL Al OPER FUND A2 OPER FUND A2 CAP FAC FUND A3 OPER FUND _43 CAP FAC FUND A5 OPER FUND A6 OPER FUND 46 CAP FAC FUND A7 OPER FUND 07 CAP FAC FUND III OPER FUND All CAP FAC FUND -A13 OPER FUND A14 OPER FUND A14 CAP FAC FUND A5&6 OPER FUND _A5&6 CAP FAC FUND A6&7 OPER FUND A7&14 OPER FUND JT OPER FUND CORF SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS PROCESSING DATE 10/30/92 PAGE 7 _ REPORT__. NUMBER _AP43.. _ _- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11/06/91 POSTING DATE 11/06/91 -.-_--_ - -_-- AMOUNT $308.40 �8,665.25 $9,778.10 $56,244.58 —4 10A33.30 .-.._-- $920.19 $235.41 $2, 249. 57 - $8,060.05 $35,817.72 $63.66 $9.67 -- 4,001.45 $15.91 $2,162.26 $24.92 $703,736.-57 4,670,497.93 $29,544.13 $147,962.22 $5,705,153.35 to I FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WCRK7NG CAPITAL PROCESSING. DATE 11/i:{/91 PAGE RFPnF?T NUMnLP AF'43 - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11/20/91 POSTING DATE 11/20/91 WARRANT NO. VFNDOR AMOUNT 11P225 AM BEST COMPANY 191.54 S29607.01 118227 A T 9 T $19396.71 118228 ACTION DOUR REPAIR CORP S69585.UC 118229 AEROCHFM INC 1475.99 1IF230 AIR FRODLCTS R CHFMICAL IN 1489522.4C 11PP31 AIRWAY SCALE CCPPANY 1295.41 FCOD• CTF - - _.__.... _ .._ ._ S59s67 118233 ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY CO LTD S39679.93 118234 ALLEN-BRACLEY $613.91 118235 ALP14AGA7 $532.27 118236 ALLIED LICFTING 1373.I;R 118237 ALPHA SETA CO 044 3341.52 -4"2.38 AMERICAN G"L-4NG- A --GO" --------- $411.89 - - 118239 AMERICAN ELECTRONICS S19040.28 118240 ROBLC INC A/OR AMERICAN SEALS S49648.93 lIP241 .--AAAHEIM CCPMERCE CTR $369.79 I1P242 ANAHFIM EXTRUSION CO INC S146.74 118243 ANAHEIM FILLS AUTO 8OCY 1173.76 --118244 ANAHEI. PF-C. EESICAAI: BLBG -•-Slv0Ri.22 ---- - -- ----- - 216245 AhAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTICh S19809.64 118246 APPLIED FILTRATION $19913.00 116247 AnUARIAN COATINGS $112.0? 118248 ARATEX SERVICES INC S155.113 118249 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT S72R.46 -4.14LX50 DENTAL !NSURANGE-60466L4.--- -•--------S36.0F__-_. --- ------ ...... . 118251 AUCIC VIEEC REFCRTING SERVI $100.53 118252 AUTOMOBILE CLUB CF SO CAL S740.40 118253 BR6 COIN -OP LAUNDRY $721.25 118254 OAF INCUSTRIES $324.2i 1182`_5 BFP TRAhc.FCRT CYNAPICS CCRF $19571.46 -118a5b FAL•G-bN DISP$&AL GLRVICf- 118257 BABCOCK DISPLAY PRODUCTS IN S29747.14 118258 BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE 132.n0 118259 BALI HAI HOTELS 3302.65 I1P260 BANCROFT-414ITNFY Cn $112.21 lIP261 TOM EARRCh GAS CHLORINATION %11910.011 -118262---• ...... B-AXTER C16GNOSTICS INC sb9018.70 118263 PEATRICE/hUNT WESSON ADM1N S199273.34 118264 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $119876.33 118265 BENNETT-H(UEN $231.67 1IF266 NERRYDALE TRAILEF VILLA SP14.E5 118267 UT PILLARD INC $43.21 -•119268•-•- --- SLACKSHIF COMPUTER SYSTEMS $69446.86 118269 BCYLE ENCIhEERINE CCRF $74#480.92. 118270 BREA CCPPLhITY FOSPITAL S591198.P(- c CESCRIPTION PUBLICATION LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES DOOR REPAIRS REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN SYST M.0.8-9-89 TRUCK SCALE REPAIR REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT MANHOLE COVERS REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT SPECIALTY GASES BUILDING MATERIALS REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT COMPUTER PARTS REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT HARDWARE REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT- - - SEWER REPAIRS DIST 7 PILLOW PLUG REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT UNIFORM RENTALS INSTRUMENT PARTS DENTAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION—_. PUBLICATION REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.7-13-88 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT BACKFLOW TESTING REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT PUBLICATION WATER SYSTEM CHLORINATION LAB SUPPLIES REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT HARDWARE REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT TRUCK PARTS OFFICE EQUIPMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-30 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT D m Z d D m 3 4t 00 I D r r d Cn PC P--, C•) Cn tz I IV FUNg 919q - JT GIST WCRKINC CAPITAL WARRANT N0. VENCOR PROCESSING DATE 11/11/91 PAGE 2 REPORT N:UMHER Af43 --COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11/20/gl POSTING DATE 11/2fl/91 AMOUNT 110271 BREA HOSPITAL $2 080.72 I18272- ---BR-IAN+S GOIN•OP LAUNDRY S353@56 118273 BRINDERSON CORP $1349651.51 lIP274 P.RITHINEE ELECTRIC 54r051.40 IIA275 BRCWN R CALEWELL CONSULTING $699766.61 118276 BRUNS61 CK CEFENSE S298P9.24 IIA277 STEVE BCBALO CONSTPUCTION CO 52189835.['Q }182aA------0441EBERIS EMPORTUM-------- ---- -- - 5g1.21 116279 THE PUREAL CF NATIONAL AFF S1r175.P3 118280 THE BURKE CCMPANY i42.78 118281 BURKE ENEINEEPThC CO SR7.2Q 11A262 GARY G STREED 569175.41) 11A2A3 CS COMPANY $71t.05 118284-.-CA04-LLAS-- FLATI-NG -- ---- -------- $19306@23 118285 CALTRCL INC 5219126.35 1182P.6 JCHN R CALAPRICE PHD S99U65.36 1182P7 CALIFORNIA IAMPAYEPS• ASSOC. I 551.48 118288 CALIF WOCDWORKING MACHINERY $1984n.91 IIF289 CALIS CAMERAS♦ INC. $371.55 -i-8298--CAR*fAA-fC-"E-REIAL GEARPET- -- -- S1-- n 118291 CENTRAL FCINT SCFTWARE INC. 557.94 118292 WA CHARNSTROM CO 559.13 110293 CHEMICAL SERVICES INC $425.98 110294 CLARK CONSULTANTS 52r160.nO 11P255 CCASTAL CCMMUNITIES HCSPITAL $29335.45 118290 TMt-EOEft--bR{kTF_�..----.--__• _._.._ _ _.5159.47 118297 COILS UNLIMITED $484988 118298 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO $792.60 11829q COMMERCIAL DOOR OF O.C.• INC. $611997 118300 COMPRESSOR COMFCNENTS CF CA 51ip530.7LI 118301 COMPLIER EAY il•Qg0.14 CCMP-L'SERVE - __. . _ -- . -- _ -... - 5178.22 118303 CONNELL CM PARTS / DIV 192.86 118304 CONSCLTOATEO FLFCTRICAL GIST $39310.62 I I A 3 0 5 CGNTINENTOL AIR TOCLS INC 149564.54 11R306 CCh7INEh7AL CHEMICAL CC 13.426.45 118307 CONTINUOUS COATING $430.39 ----118308 - - --•- CONTRACTORvS BOOK STORF $87.22 I 118309 CONVERSE CONSLLTANTS 0 C $2 054.90 118310 CCRE-ROSICN FRCDUCTS 5149.2E 1 0311 COSTA MEGA AUTO SUPPLY S929.21 � 1 118312 COUNTY INVESTMENTS 5418.54 118313 COUNTY WF•CLESALE ELECTRIC %19293.1'1 ---11A314 CREST COATING INC $612.09 118315 CUSTCM ENAMELERS INC %290.P5 1 118316 EMPLCYMENI DEVELCPMFNT CEF1 $150.83 DESCRIPTION REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT CONSTRUCTION J-19-2 ELECTRIC PARTS ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT CONSTRUCTION 2-26-3, 2-28 HARDWARE PUBLICATION JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ELECTRIC SUPPLIES PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT VALVES REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT INSTRUMENT PARTS OCEAN MONITORING M.O.11-14-90 SUBSCRIPTION TOOL CAMERA & FILM _.. CARPETING COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAIL BAG REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT SUBSCRIPTION ELECTRIC PARTS PUMP PARTS DOOR REPAIRS CHLORINATION PARTS LAB SUPPLIES COMPUTER SERVICES TRUCK PARTS ELECTRICAL PARTS TOOLS CHLORINE REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT PUBLICATIONS SOIL TESTING M.O.7-17-91 FREIGHT TRUCK PARTS REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT INSTRUMENT PARTS REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT D m Z CJ m 3 ZHZ 00 Cal FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE Il/li/ol IAGF 3 REPORT NUMFICk AF'4' -- --- -- --- -- -- ----CCUNTY-SANITATION DISTRICTS OF CRANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11/20/91 POSTING DATE 11/29/91 WARRANT NO. VENDOR lle317 DAILY PILCT - DAAIELS-TIRE SERVICE- - - 118319 DE ANZA CORPORATION 118320 DEL MAR AVIONICS 118321 DEZURIK AND/OR CS CO 118322 OIATEC ENVIRCNNENTAL 118323 OIFILIFFC ASSCCIATES fS--RESTAIIRANT------- 118325 DISCO FRINT COMPANY 218326 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC 118327 OORR-CLIVER INC 11e328 DC4NEYPS ECILFR B WELCINC R 118329 DUNN EEWARDS CCRP ---i•18338- --D VNa4&1I&T - 118331 EnINGER CENTER 118332 EDO CORPORATION lIP333 E F HCUCHTON 118334 EMA SERVICES INC 118335 EASTMAN INC --41-8336- E^•,•"AF_VS4S--4NG --- 118337 EMERALD ISLE MOBILEHOME -11e338 ENCHANTER INC 11P339 EKGRAVEPS INM CC 118340 F 8 W FROPERTIES 118341 FAIRWAY FORD SALES INC -118342 - oOHN---B•--FAL-KENS-TE-IN-PE------ 118343 FARR SALES A SERVICE IIS344 FEDERAL EXPRESS COPP 1IF345 FERRELLCAS 118346 CHEMWEST INC IIS347 FILTER SLPPLY CO --118�4A• - F•ISGHER-E --F CR-TER --- CO----- - - 118349 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO 118350 FLUID HANDLING SYSTEMS 118351 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY 1183E2 FOUNTAIN VALLEY FAINT 118353 FCk ENTERPRISES -1-18354--•-• --- •• FGARCRO CC I— MAG - SYSTEMS 118155 CITY OF FULLERTCN 11e356 FULLERTON FOODS 118357 GRC RESTALRANTS M23 ..I 11R358 GANAI-L LLML'ER CO lIP359 GARCNEF LIThCCRAFH ------ 118360-. GEM-C-LITE PLASTICS CORF 1IF361 GENERAL TELEFHONE CC 1 118362 GIERLICH-MITCI^ELL INC AMOUNT $29243.25 $510069 S150.00 $115.61 $6119.33 13t802.85 1219.R1 S511.97 S29833.34 S1296e6.90 $329#27 S169520.00 $561.34 _ -5976.52 $19164.39 SR33.24 S973.03 S19601.32 S29343.'-2 --$49183.71 $29590.34 S593911.AD 5294.54 $171.61 S3O6.12 S39200.HU- SP9317*03 $76.5U $76.55 S29233.75 $698.14 S39954.47 S19667.59 $175.74 5350.00 $389.41 $19825.01' $957.Gq S89.61 $760.43 S51A-5' 4191yf,.33 $245.21- $375.15 $39837.39 $389538.37 DF.SCPIPTION NOTICES & ADS TRUCK PARTS EQUIPMENT RENTAL REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT VALVES CHEMICALS PRINTING REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT PRINTING PLANT MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS MECHANICAL SUPPLIES BOILER REPAIRS PAINT SUPPLIES REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT.. REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES J-23-2 OFFICE SUPPLIES CONSULTING SERVICES REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT OCEAN MONITORING M.0.7-17-91 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-4, I-9 FILTERS AIR FREIGHT PROPANE FIBERGLASS ENGINE PARTS INSTRUMENT PARTS LAB SUPPLIES PUMP PARTS PERMIT PAINT SUPPLIES SAFETY CONSULTING INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES WATER USE REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT BUILDING MATERIALS REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT BUILDING MATERIALS TELEPHONE SERVICES MECHANICAL SUPPLIES FUN 9I99 - JT DIST WCPKIhC CAFITAL FPOC.FSSINf, DATE 11/13/01 PAGE 4 - PEFGRT NUHClEP AV43 `- --- CBHNTV-SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY - - - CLAIMS PAID 11/20/91 POSTING DATF 11/20/91 z WARRANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT [IESCPIPTION 118363 GnRDONIS INC $12.24 OFFICE SUPPLIES 14864 6RAAF6-@ENTER ----- ----- - -.--- ---S421.85 - - REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 118365 GRAPFIC CISTRIP.UTCRS S790.Pq FILM 2183E6 GREIF PRCTHEPS INC $372.43 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT IIA367 NO TYPE 9 GRAPHICS SR5.93 PRINTING 118368 HACH COMFANY $858.55 LAB SUPPLIES I18369 HAMILTON CO $81.92 LAB SUPPLIES 1184.7$ ---HARM-AN - PLPP-C$-- -- - ----$445063 - MECHANICAL PARTS -- - - 116371 HARTE-HARKS COPFUNICATICNS I i19356.31 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 118372 HALLA►AV CONTAINERS $3*510.00 CONTAINER RENTALS , 110373 HILT] INC SIn4.nc HARDWARE 118374 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF INC 149855.61 COMPRESSOR PARTS 118375 J.T. HORVATH 9 ASSOC. i3•L'U0.ol CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, J-7-4 m Z 11837b---•-#GUSE--.GF---•BAT-4CAi6B -- --------- - 548.23 BATTERIES _ - t7 118377 PS HLGI-ES CC INC S29111086 SAFETY SUPPLIES 11837E HUNTINGTCN VALLEY TCCL S1A1.5U TOOLS -- 119379 -HUNTINGTON' VALLEY SCHWINN C 53,68U.93 BICYCLES/PARTS -yj 118380 HYDRACON COMPANY i297.45 LAB SUPPLIES m IIA381 IEEE SERVICE CENTER - CP7 $164.24 PUBLICATION 3 8-382 $39778.01- - _._ . _. _ .• REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENTFERRIC 118303 IMPERIAL LEST CHEMICAL $61r523.23 :4t O0 118384 INDEPENDENT EXPLORATION $318.28 RBFUND USERRIDE FEE OVfiRPAYMENTO 118325 INDEPENDENT FORGE CO S338.8P REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT I lIP3P6 INDUSTRIAL TPREACED PRCOUCTS S90R.2° CONNECTORS D r „ 11P3e7 IAGRAM POFER $19508.42 OFFICE SUPPLIES REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT r -4183 8 INTfR&TAT!`--£6ECHi9N1ES-CGPPr -- - - - -- 66*825@25 r „ 118389 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $72.64 WATER USE REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT d „I 118390 I D M CORP 1 S1*606.58 MICROFICHE READER LEASE �--� 11839 CRORT CCRP 5145.32 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES C/) 118352 GREAT 6ES7EPh SANITARY SUFF S1i897.39 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSES --1- 118393 JAYOS CATERING 3526.09 TRUCK PARTS ;�o i•183-94 VICE• - -- $100.66 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT ~ 118395 JOHNSON CONTROLS BATTERY DI S2.778.55 GROUP HEALTH CONSULTING 118396 JOHNSON R HIGGINS S59750.0n TRUCK EQUIPMENT 116397 JCHNSTONE SUPPLY 13r629.6C FREIGHT 11835E KAR FRCCLC7S S3.77 MACHINE SUPPLIES 118399 KING BEARING INC $674.65 LAB SERVICES - 118400-•--- --• -• -KINNETIC LAB -- INC - - $189480.GL REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT „i 1IF401 KONA KAI MOBILE HCME PARK $59570.95 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I lle402 MARTIN KCRDICK SR S29946.30 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 11E403 LA CELLLLAR 7ELEFFONE CC S597.04 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT „j lIP404 JC ANN RFILLY $344.14 PUBLICATION 118405 LEARN KEY $204.85 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT ..�---118406-- - •--- LEASE -ALL LA FALNA $5*602.16 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT i 118407 LERNER FPCCESSIKE LAP 1500096 TRUCK REPAIRS 11840E LEWCO ELECTRIC CO S259.n3 FUND NO WARRANT NO. QT QQ . AT niev Ur OV TIo r- rAO T Tq VENDOR L PROCESSING DATE 11/13/Q1 PAGF c� REPORT NUMPER AF43 - ----- COUNTY --SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11/20/91 POSTING DATE 11/20/91 'I 119409 JAPES A LIRERIC 1 1-IS410 -LIFECCM-SAFETY--•SERVICE-- CUFPL-_._--_ .I 118411 LIKE MFG CO 118412 LINCOLN CENTER MOBILE HOME 118413 LINKLETIER PROPERTIES 118414 KP LINCSIROM INC 118415 LCS ALAPIICS GENERAL VCSrIT --i}84i6-- --SBC-A-EYRCF-CGRP - ----- .I 118417 MPS 11R418 MARVAC ELECTRONICS 118419 CON PAUREP m 1IF420 SCLTF STAR m 118421 MCCCY SfEET METAL WORKS IN Z 184-22---_-MGK&NNA---ENGA-B-E"IP t= 118423 MEDICAL ARTS EAST 118424 MICRCAGE COMPUTER 118425 MIDLAND MFG CORP 118426 MINE SAFETY AFPLIANCFS CO 3 118427 MISCC r -118428- --.TIFG•ME+k-44C4F3 9I�5TRUfTGRS- N 118429 MCNITEK INC 00 118430 MONITOR PUBLISHING CO IIS431 118432 MONTGOMERY BROTHERS INC MCRTCN 1NTEPNATICNAL INC D 118433 MCTTCN INCLSTRIES INC r -i18434---• -•--I�ATIGNAL-fEAAT-SERVICES INC r 1 118435 NEUTRONIC PLATING SERVICES d 118436 NEVILLE CHEMICAL CO 119437 NEW HERPES INC Cn 11P438 NF-WPCRT/CCSTA MESA YMCA -F 1164!9 NCRIhROF CCRF-AIRCPAFT tI8440 _.---04--CGR PCR AT C~') 118441 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES 118442 OFFICE FAVILICN/INTERTOR RES Cn 118443 OX SYSTEMS CC 118444 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C 11R445 ORANGE CCUNTY FARM SUPPLY C --�1A446------ - ---ORANGE PRF-CISION-CIRCUITS IIA447 CRANGE VILVE K F17TINC CC. 118448 CXYGEN SERVICE 1IS449 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 118450 COUNTY CF GRANGE „I 71R4F1 PACIFIC CIRCUITS SERVICES -•--118452--- -.-PACIFIC PCPtL[-CFFICES t 118453 PACIFIC CLTLCCK SFORIS4EAR 11F454 PACIFIC PLBLISHERS bd 2 AMOUNT DESCRIPTION $273.86 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT $135.nO CYLINDER REPAIRS $101.25 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT $89334.11 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT f29063.08 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT S29702.2H ENVIRO CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.10-10-90 S1U9217.8A REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT --S8180AP JANITORIAL SUPPLIES S68.96 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES $241.79 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES $49650#09 OCEAN MONITORING CONSULTANT $67.12 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES S133.07 ELECTRIC PARTS - - 5932.71 PUMP PARTS S558.23 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT S1939837.66 COMPUTER HARDWARE/SOFTWARE M.0.10-9-91 S297nl.96 CHLORINATION PARTS $41.06 SAFETY SUPPLIES $134.41 OFFICE EQUIPMENT --5466�606sP0 - - CONSTRUCTION 7-11-2 $202.22 INSTRUMENT PARTS S123.00 SUBSCRIPTION $19356.40 LAB SUPPLIES S29487.R7 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT $117.92 HARDWARE S840.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES $106.19 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT $425.26 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT S347.67 HARDWARE $857.19 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT S29J26.17 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT S353.25 LAB SUPPLIES $312.94 SAFETY GLASSES S19848.94 OFFICE FURNITURE S?7.421.R2 CHLORINE M.0.2-14-90 $138094 TRUCK PARTS S36n.lk GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES S137.69 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT $428.32 FITTINGS 5315.8E SPECIALTY GASES 15T758.93 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE S83.00 PERMITS 5567.76 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT $521.25 BUILDING REPAIRS SI025.60 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT S58.00 PUBLICATION f� 1 CJ� WARRANT NO. 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL VENDOR PROCESSING DATE 11/13/91 PAGE REPORT NUM13FR AF43 U14TY-SANUTA14-CN-DIST-R-ICTS-OF-ORANGE- COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11/20/gl POSTING DATE 11/20/91 118455 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO 118456 PA&T EL --ME F 104-A#-&YS-T EM &- --- 118457 PAGENET 118458 PALM LOCGE MOBILE ESTATES 11P-4E9 PALPTERI9 TYLER• 4IENEP9 1164E0 PENTADYNE CIRCUITS INC 118461 PHOTO 8 SOUND CO 418462- ---P1GKWI-CK-PAPER- - 118463 PIMA GRC SYSTEPS INC 118464 PLAINS TRLEVALUE HARDWARE 11e4E5 PLETCN CCRP 02 m 118466 POLYFURE INC FTT 118467 POWDERCOAT SERVICES ELECTRC---SUFP6Y--CO-- L7 118469 HARCLC PRIMROSE ICE 11e470 PRCOLCTICN PLATING '-� 118471 THE PROJECT SCLUTIONS CO. Fl 11R472 RAINBOW CISPOSAL CO 3 IIF473 RALPHS GROCERY 1171 ---1.16+74----- Ry1Tii1AY--AAB-*$$0£TATE-9---INC , 118475 DAVIE L RAY - ASSIGNEE 00 118476 RECYC INC 118477 PRCC CORP R REDLINE ENT 318478 ITDC- REGIONAL TRAINING CENTER 118479 THE REGISTER r 118480- -------REIB--MEIAI FI-ht6HING---- r"' 218481 REMECY TEMP C� 1104R2 THE REPUPLIC SUPPLY CO 118483 RESTEK CCRP C/) IIP.484 ROCCO'S TRUCK WRECKING �i..l 1184@5 RCSEPCUNT INC - VAREC DIV r-r I---118486.-------.---RC-Y•AL- IhCLESALE-- ELECTRIC - �li 118487 S&G TUBE Cn �. 118488 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP lIP489 SAFETY SUPPLY OF AMERICA 118450 SAACCN ENCINEFRIAG INC 118491 SAYET CCFFCRATICN --118492 - SCOTT SPECIALTY- GASES INC 118493 SEA -BIRO ELECTRONICS INC 118494 SEA COAST DESIGNS 118495 SEARS ROEP.UCK d C.0 116456 SENSCREV INC 118497 - SHAMROCK SUPPLY 18498---- -• ---SHERATON ANAHEIM HOTEL-- 118499 SHUR LOK COPP 118500 SILICCN SISTEPS INC 6 ( AMOUNT DESCRIPTION $59714.65 SAFETY SUPPLIES -- - s19685.25 -"-• TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS ._ ... 573.79 EQUIPMENT LEASE $59240.73 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 551-686.10 LEGAL SERVICES - OIL WELLS $799.9A REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT $236.20 RADIO --- 5193.44 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES $839659.63 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5-8-91 $55.99 HARDWARE $161.67 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT $169251.17 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-87 5100.3U REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT $21.1.45 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 5196.0n ICE 5976.01 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT $4972(1.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O.7-17-91" 1193,111.17 TRASH REMOVAL $342.31 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT PHOTOGRAMMETRIC MAPPING SERVICES - --51#19395660 523.44 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 152, A9T.33 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-13-91 $89733 ' STREET SWEEPING SERVICES 539900.0o TRAINING REGISTRATION $49513*18 NOTICES & ADS S980942 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 51,420.A0 TEMPORARY SERVICES 529490.37 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 5240.OV TRAINING REGISTRATION $134.69 TRUCK PARTS 5586.37 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT $148.70 ELECTRIC PARTS $116#93 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT $80.75 PARTS CLEANER SR2.31 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 521,509.R0 SEWER REPAIRS DIST 2 543.95 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 5568.92 LAB SUPPLIES 5387.0f' LAB EQUIPMENT 1751.52 OFFICE MACHINES 5467.86 LAB FREEZER S5R5.24 INSTRUMENT PARTS $39493.66 HARDWARE $39092.39 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT $74402 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT $119969.2t REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT bd I v FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL -WARRANT NO. VENCOR FPOCFSSING DATE 1111'/91 FAGF 7 Rf PORT NUMHEP Al 43 b-T"A#11TAHG*--DISTOICTS--OF--OR-ANSE--COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11/20/91 POSTING DATE 11/20/91 - 118501 SILVERI 8 LE BCUEF tF502 SK I"Y--+ AVEN•---RE-9TUiRANT--- - 118503 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLI 116504 SLIDE FASTER IIF.505 SMITH-EMEFY CC ` 118506 SMITH FIFE. 8 SUPPLY INC 118507 SNAP -ON TOOLS CORP 4i850R-------COMPtSAT- -INC .- ------ I 118509 SO COAST AIR QUALITY 1IF510 SOLTF-ERN CALIF EDISON CC 118511 SO CAL GAS CO 11R512 SO CALIF WATER CO fG" 11A513 SCUTFEPN CCLK71FS CIL CC C --118514------- - 4CUVENIR -Fh6TC--_-.__.-.._._�-- 118515 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER .� 118516. STAMEN Z SPASS6FF- PE � 11P517 SPECIAL ELASTIC SYSTEMS TNC rn 118518 SnUAPE C 6ESTEP.h CEPCT 3 I1R519 STAR TCCL R SLFPLY CC 148520---- ---61-AT-E••-•C6kLE6E--ME011AL----£TR-- -- : �I 118521 STEVENS METAL FINISHING OQ r 118522 STRAUB DIST CC LTD I 1111523 SUMMIT STEEL 118524 SUNSET FCRD �� 118525 SUNSET FIFELIKE 8 TERMINALLIKG r r SUPELCO.. INC 118527 SUPER CHEM CORP tz ' 118928 TAUBER ELECTRONICS 110529 TAYLCR-CUFh MFG CCMPANY C.,. 1IF530 TEKFCRM PRCUUCTS CO 118531 THERMCO SYSTEMS INC ;I C7 118533 TOWER CCNFERENCE PGMT. CC. 118534 TCLCFSTChE SCFT6ARE CORP. 118535 TRAVEL TFAVEL 118536 TRI-STAR 1IF537 TRUCK a AUTC SUPPLY INC L-.118538 - - - - J6--- TUCKER 9 - SGN --INC 11A539 US PCSTAL SERVICE 118540 UNOCAL IIF541 UNITED CIRCUIT TECHNOLOGY 11P542 UNITEC FAPCEL SERVICE 118543 UNITEC SLATES F.LEV07CR CCPF 118544------------VG/F-ISICNS•INSTRUMLN7S 118545 V P LAUNCRY 118546 VOC TESTING to VI V J c AMOUNT 562.019.00 - - E232s05 -- $35.00 $176.09 S9.153.00 $284.4Q $450.60 - -- $86.19 $150.00 $3169528.38 S6.735.57 $96.6q $5.933.04 $194.26 $29735.58 S1o560.00 S591.06 $367.73 129549.62 S213.14 $391.14 S232.59 S19992029 Slln.91 S1n0.U11 $72.49 S670.A0 S1.75R.81 $269.16 $29135.16 $562.89 SISO. Rn S760.On $9 7.76 S1.805.n0 $595.04 S252.?? $133.34 S1.33(l.04 $170.35 $403.52 T110.9F $327.L)P $14 . J '10.1# G $148.62 $770.00 DESCRIPTION CONSTRUCTION 5-34-3 - - REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT. _. PRE -EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS PRESENTATION AIDS SOIL TESTING M.0.7-17-91 PLUMBING SUPPLIES TOOLS COMPUTER SOFTWARE PERMIT FEES POWER NATURAL GAS WATER USE DIESEL/UNLEADED FUEL PHOTO SERVICES DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS ENGINEERING SERVICES M.0.2-14-90 PIPING HARDWARE TOOLS REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT METAL TRUCK PARTS REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT LAB SUPPLIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES BATTERIES TRUCK PARTS REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT ANALYSIS TRAINING REGISTRATION COMPUTER SOFTWARE TRAVEL SERVICES M.0.6-12-91 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT TRUCK SUPPLIES INSTRUMENT PARTS REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT UNLEADED GASOLINE REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT PARCEL SERVICES ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE LAB EQUIPMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT EMISSIONS TESTING FUND 9199 - JT GIST WCPKIRC CAPITAL WARRANT NC. VEROOR PROCESSING DATE 11/13/91 FAGF Y REFORT NUMHER AP43 #J"-V S*ITAT-1-•ON-0fSTRICTS--OF--0RANlFECOUNTY - __.......... CLAIMS PAID 11/20/91 POSTING DATE 11/20/91 119547 VWR SCIENTIFIC —148,54 VA,6 f* CITIES -6VPPEY-_c6--- 118549 VAN CORER PUBBER CO 118550 RCSEPCUNT INC 1IF551 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS' 118552 VERTEX SYSTEMS 1185F3 VILLAGF NURSERIES --II8554•-- VGRT-fK-IACUSTRI-ES---- 118555 WE KRISMAR/KLAUS BERGER 118556 WEBER AIRCRAFT INC 11P557 WEBER NAPE PLATE 116558 WEST COAST ANALYTICAL SPV 11P559 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY —1185b6 —XE-RON-bCAP -- - 118561 DON YODER DEVELOPMENT 92 118562 YORBA ORANGE GROWERS SUMMARY AMOUNT S19672.74 — — - - - $l2.857.89--- - $845.03 145.89 2495.38 S1r072.5(1 $131.02 --i2,1150692 S56R.7U S59083.58 S295.31 $1*720.011 $479913.00 - -- 219881.52.. 24r619.50 $386.5P ----------------- TOTAL CLAIMS FAIL 11/20/91 S29580017.46 #1 OPER FUND #2 OPER FUND -#2 -CAP--FAC -FUND-•---- #3 OPER FUND #5 OPER FUND #5 CAP PAC FUND #6 OPER FUND #7 OPER FUND -#7 -CAP .. PAC -FUND ---.--.. - -- - - . #11 OPER FUND #14 OPER FUND #14 CAP FAC FUND #5&6 OPER FUND #7&14 OPER FUND -+TT- OPER FUND ---. CORF SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS JT WORKING CAPITAL $1,503.60 $7,212.58 $309,900.66 $17,975.74 $9,778.59 $62,019.00 $687.50 $11,135.47 $484,026.70 $8,436.47 $68.11 $6,648.37 $2,834.64 $88.83 $934,877.25 $392,782.04 $5,794.93 $325,046.98 $2,580,817.46 DE�CR IPT TON LAB SUPPLIES PLUMBING SUPPLIES -- --- REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT FREIGHT LAB SUPPLIES COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES BUILDING REPAIRS _ REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT LAB SERVICES CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-8-90 COPIER LEASES REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Nine (9) CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE December 11, 1991 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 47,979.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the folllowing additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - ADDITIONAL LIGHTING NEEDED IN THE PARKING LOT The Contractor was directed to install additional lighting -in the west parking lot and along the north side of the Central Laboratory. This work consisted of installing three light poles with a total of five lights and one photocell all with the necessary wiring. The work was required in order to provide adequate lighting in the west parking lot and the through driveway along the north side of the building. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 2, FCO 14) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 17,519.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - OFFSITE FIRE ALARM CONDUIT The Contractor was directed to install two concrete -encased conduits from the west side of Fuentes Road near the Personnel Building and from fire water backflow preventers on the south side of Vehicle Storage Building No. 8 and the Auto Shop Building, all to the new Central Laboratory Building to the fire alarm panel in Room 124. This work is required in order to detect if the sprinklers have gone off in any building. This is a requirement of the fire department for fire protection. (Reference: PCH 11, FCO 28, COR 52R) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 14,655.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days tic-i" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-l" \110,i '\%,✓ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Nine (9) CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE December 11, 1991 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY. JOB NO. J-17 Item 3 - EXIT SIGN AT EAST EXIT, BONDING OF PIPES IN ROOM 121 AND ROOM 105, ELECTRIC PANELS REWIRED The Contractor was directed to install a lighted exit sign at the east exit and to bond together all the pipes in Rooms 105 and 121 and to modify electrical panels in both rooms. Work in Rooms 105 and 121 was required because the'east exit of the building is in need of a lighted exit sign to be consistent with the rest of the building. The bonding of the piping in Rooms 105 and 121 (electrical equipment rooms) require bonding according to the most recent National Electric Code and as an additional safety precaution. The modification of the panels is required because of changes made in the fume hoods and transformers in the building and for proper operation of various equipment. This item of work was accomplished by the Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: RFI 326, FCO 34, COR 76) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,015.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 - TELEPHONE AND COMPUTER CONDUITS FOR ROOM 122 The Contractor was directed to install two 24-inch x 24-inch x 12-inch pull boxes in the ceiling in Room 122 and two 2-inch conduits from pull boxes to the telephone backboard in Room 225. These pull boxes and conduits are required so that telephone and computer conduits can easily serve the center area of Room 122 for the future office use of this space. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: District memo of May 15, 1991, COR 63) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,983.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "C-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS 11C-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Nine (9) CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE December 11, 1991 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY. JOB NO. J-17 Item 5 - INTERIOR SIGNS The Contractor was directed to increase the number of signs inside the building from a total of 50 to 57 and expand most signs from abbreviations to full words and multiple words. The size had to be increased to accommodate the increase in letters. This change is required in order to bring these signs in conformance with other signs in the District offices and provide a greater explanation of each room use. These items of work were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: District memo September 25, 1991, FCO 48) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,614.00 0 Calendar Days Item 6 - ADD DOOR HOLDING DEVICE, LOADING DOCK HANDRAILS AND WATER BALANCING COCK The Contractor was directed to: 1) Add a door stop and a hold open device to Doors 46 (trash enclosure doors located outside the building on the east side), 2) Modify and install handrails at the revised loading dock on the north side of the building and 3) Add a balancing cock to the water system below Room 214 on the hot water return line. The above -mentioned work was required for the following reasons: 1) The door stop and hold open device for the trash enclosure doors are required so the doors will not be damaged prematurely, 2) The handrails had to be modified to the loading dock because the stairway to the dock well was constructed away from the laboratory building for safety reasons and to provide greater distance from the Laboratory Building wing wall to the loading dock and 3) The balancing cock added to the hot water return system was required for the overall operation of the entire hot water system. These items of work were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: RFI 285, District memo July 29, 1991, October 7, 1991, FCO 47) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,373.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "C-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "..d COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Nine (9) CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE December 11, 1991 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 Item 7 - DRINKING FOUNTAIN - FIRST FLOOR The Contractor was directed to add a drinking fountain on the first floor in the center hall. It was determined that a drinking fountain was needed on the first floor for adequate accommodations for office personnel. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 30) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,820.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 47,979.00 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor., except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date Original Contract.Time Original Completion Date Time Extension this C.O. Total Contract Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Final Completion Due Date Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Actual Final Completion Date March 1, 1990 420 Calendar Days April 24, 1991 0 Calendar Days 251 Calendar Days 671 Calendar Days December 31, 1991 Not Applicable Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 7,090,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 758,027.74 This Change (Addy (Deduct) $ 47,979.00 Amended Contract Price $ 7,896,006.74 11C-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Nine (9) CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE December 11, 1991 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 Board Authorization Date: December 11, 1991 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED BY: Engineer ate APPROVED BY: let"w'? /itl Director of Engineering Date J. R. ROBERTS CORPORATION A TED BY: Contractor Date RECOMMENDED BY: Co struction Manager Date APPROVED AS TO FORM: 111 Z ql Gener 1 Counsel IDate "C-511 AGENDA ITEM #9 (d) - ALL DISTRICTS 11 C-511 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 2 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Five '(5) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE December 11, 1991 JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ (20,000.00) In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - RESOLUTION OF ISSUES REGARDING TOSHIBA MEDIUM VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR This item accepts Toshiba as manufacturer of the medium voltage switchgear provided all contract requirements are met. The Districts maintain all rights to question, test, and otherwise inspect Toshiba switchgear to ensure the equipment meets all requirements set forth in the contract documents. There will be.no time extension, extended overhead, or direct charges granted �..✓ regarding submittal review time necessary for the Toshiba medium voltage switchgear. There will be no charges for provisions made by the Contractor to blockout the main floor of the Central Generation Building to accommodate switchgear of another manufacturer should it have been necessary. This item also includes reimbursement to the Districts for excessive time required by Districts personnel and consultants to review and correct Toshiba submittals. DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (20,000.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ (20,000.00) TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. "D-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 2 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Five (5) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE Decenber 11, 1991 JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1. Job No. J-19-1 SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date February 21, 1991 Original Contract Time 600 Calendar Days Original Completion Date October 12, 1992 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 13 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 613 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date October 25, 1992 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 15,410,855.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 115,245.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ (20,000.00) Amended Contract Price $ 15,506,100.00 Board Authorization Date: December 11, 1991 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SU MITTE BY: RECO ENDED BY: 4-vq� Engineer Date Co t ction Manager Date APP V P& Y: APPR VED AS TO FORM: ? //// q D ector of gine ring Date Gen al Counsel Date HUNTER CORPORATION ACCEPTED BY: Il��q�l CoYitractor Date "D-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-2" F9 Fin \•.% COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE December 11, 1991 JOB: CONTROL CENTER/OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING, JOB NO. J-23-1 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Ded et) $ 10,856.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract.price are hereby approved. Item 1 - ADDITIONAL FIRE ALARM STROBE UNITS The Contractor was directed to provide ten additional fire alarm strobe units including conduit, conductors and hookup. These changes were required by the City of Fountain Valley Fire Department per plan review letter and were not included in the contract drawings or specifications. This work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 12, JRR CDR 18) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,705.00 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - REPLACE DARK BRONZE ANODIZED FINISH WITH CLEAR ANODIZED FINISH The Contractor was directed to delete the dark bronze anodized finish for the storefront and projection window frames and replace with a clear anodized finish. This change was recommended by the project consultant to provide a closer color match to existing adjacent buildings. This work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 13, JRR COR 20A) DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (2,800.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 3 - DELETE ENTRANCE MAT AND FRAMES The Contractor was directed to delete entrance mats and frames. This change was requested by staff because of the limited benefit obtained from a recessed entrance mat. This work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (3,000.00) 0 Calendar Days "E-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER Page 2 of 3 C. 0. NO. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE December 11 1991 JOB: CONTROL CENTER/OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING, JOB NO. J-23-1 Item 4 - REALIGNMENT OF TUNNEL The Contractor was directed to install angle points in Tunnel No. 8 between the basement and the existing opening of the tunnel. This item includes additional surveying, excavation, backfill and compaction, concrete formwork, rebar and electrical trays. These changes were required per Plan Change No. 1 in which it was determined that the Control Center Building should be located 12 feet west of the original contract -specified location. The realignment was needed so the existing opening of Tunnel No. 8 would remain unchanged. This work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 15, JRR COR 6) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 11,951.00. TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 4 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 10,856.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 4 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 4 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date March 27, 1991 Original Contract Time 270 Calendar Days Original Completion Date December 21, 1991 Time Extension this C.O. 4 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 15 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 285 Calendar Days January 5, 1992 Revised Final Completion Due Date Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 3,675,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 35,392.00 This Change (Add) (W duet) $ 10,856:00 Amended Contract Price $ ,721,248.00 "E-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS „E_2„ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE December 11, 1991 JOB: CONTROL CENTER%OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE_BUILDING. JOB N0, J-23-1 Board Authorization Date: December 11, 1991 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED BY: \, WI ngineer Date APPROVED BY: Director of Engineering Date J. R. ROBERTS CORPORATION AC EPTED BY: Contractor Date 1*10, RECOMMENDED BY: C nstruction Manager Date APPROVED AS TO FORM: 11 z 1 Genera Counsel Date "E-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Fifteen (15) CONTRACTOR: Gust K. Newberg Construction Co. DATE December 11, 1991 JOB: PRIMARY CLARIFIERS NOS. 6-15 AND RELATED FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-33 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Aadct) $ 66,897.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the folllowing additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - ADDITIONAL DAMP PROOFING AT CLARIFIERS The Contractor was directed to apply additional damp proof coatings to the below grade exterior walls of the east and west scum galleries at the south end of the clarifiers. The referenced areas were not specified to receive damp proofing, but were required to prevent ground water seepage into a dry corridor. This/ item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: GKN 370-51, FCO 75) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,098.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - PROVIDE ACCESS FOR DRILLING RIG The Districts decided to investigate the subsurface soils at the Primary Effluent Distribution Box (PEDB) to determine possible solutions to settlement problems in this area. The investigation involved sampling of soils by a drilling rig which had rubber tires. The day before the rig was due, the area was flooded. The extra work included removal of wet soils and replacement of suitable material necessary to support the drilling rig. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: GKN 370-88, FCO 45) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 825.00 0 Calendar Days "F-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(9) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 ,J CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Fifteen (15) CONTRACTOR: Gust K. Newberg Construction Co. DATE December 11, 1991 JOB: PRIMARY CLARIFIERS NOS. 6-15 AND RELATED FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-33 Item 3 - REMOVE UNSUITABLE SOILS AT 90-INCH RCP During excavation for the 90-inch RCP at the splitter box the Contractor encountered unsuitable material consisting of peat and clays. The area involved was located at the two 90-inch fittings which specified a large thrust block (approximately 50 feet long and 40 feet wide). The Contractor was directed to remove and dispose of the unsuitable material and replace the area with rock. The unsuitable material was not shown on the contract documents and was required to be removed for proper thrust block support. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. Reference: GKN 370-92, FCO 47) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 15,957.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 - REMOVE EXCESS CONCRETE AT AERATION BASINS A conflict was discovered during the installation of the large RCP connecting the existing aeration basins to the P1-33 project piping network. A portion of the existing concrete foundation of the aeration basins was required to be removed to allow for the installation of the -contract -specified piping. The as -built drawings for the original aeration basin construction did not show the correct outer limits of the existing concrete foundation. This item includes costs for excess concrete removal and its disposal and for the epoxy coating of exposed reinforcement. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: GKN 370-93, FCO 48 and RFI 174) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,703.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 5 - FOUL AIR DUCT MODIFICATION AT SPLITTER BOX The Contractor was directed to modify the foul air duct work in the Splitter Box to avoid conflict with the location of the concrete support beams as shown on the contract drawings. This modification also allowed for the future removal of the precast concrete troughs. The extra costs involved with this item include additional fiberglass ducting, fittings, and field cuts. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: GKN 370-104, FCO 61 and RFI 180) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: .$ 5,715.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "F-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Fifteen (15) CONTRACTOR: Gust K. Newberg Construction Co. DATE December 11, 1991 JOB: PRIMARY CLARIFIERS NOS. 6-15 AND RELATED FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-33 Item 6 - RAISE EXISTING MANHOLES TO GRADE The Contractor was directed to raise five existing manholes located adjacent to roadways paved in this contract. The fire manholes were not, however, in contract work areas and were not shown to be raised on the contract drawings. Two of the manholes required 3-foot extensions to accommodate new paving grades. The others required smaller adjustment. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: GKN 370-94, GKN 370-103, FCO 49, FCO 57, RFI 173) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,562.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 7 - REPAIR ELECTRICAL DUCTBANK While excavating for the 108-inch RCP the Contractor encountered and damaged an electrical ductbank that was not shown on the contract plans. It was decided that it would be more cost effective to remove a portion of the non -critical ductbank within the pipe trench zone in lieu of supporting it in place. This was due to the nature of the damage and also allowed for the contract work to continue with no delay time. The extra costs involved with this item include furnishing and installing additional wire, conduit and concrete. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: GKN 370-96, GKN 370-59, FCO 76) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 14,812.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 8 - METERING STRUCTURE MODIFICATION The Contractor was directed to modify the structural steel platform in the metering structure. This modification was required to properly access the transducer flow meter in the 90-inch RCP which is located in the metering structure. This item includes extra costs for modifications to the platform, stairs and handrails. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: GKN 370-111, FCO 73) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,586.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "F-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIF,ORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER Page 4 of 5* C. 0. NO. Fifteen (15) CONTRACTOR: Gust K. Newberg Construction Co. DATE December 11, 1991 JOB: PRIMARY CLARIFIERS NOS. 6-15 AND RELATED FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-33 Item 9 - WSSPS ROOF DECK AND EQUIPMENT PLATFORM MODIFICATIONS The metal deck and the two equipment platforms Sidestream Pump Station required modifications. furnish and install supplementary support beams fan platforms accordingly. These modifications support of two supply fans located on the roof contract plans. This item was negotiated with Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. FCO 58) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: located at the roof of the Waste The Contractor was directed to to the roof deck and modify two were required for adequate deck, but were not shown on the the Contractor pursuant to (Reference: GKN 370-1002 $ 7,639.00 0 Calendar Days $ 66,897.00 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date November 2, 1989 Original Contract Time 800 Calendar Days Original Completion Date January 11, 1992 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 35 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 835 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date February 15, 1992 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 39,657,000.00 Prev. Auth. Chan) es $ 1,495,639.33 This Change (Add) ( i;) $_ 66,897.00 Amended Contract Price $_ 41.219.536.33 "F-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Fifteen (15) CONTRACTOR: Gust K. Newberg Construction Co. DATE December 11, 1991 JOB: PRIMARY CLARIFIERS NOS. 6-15 AND RELATED FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-33 Board Authorization Date: December 11, 1991 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED BY: RECOMMENDED BY: 0 P-4"' -"' - ' - .� (= `� I1 e `1;,jgrr- 4f,0,l _ �L - 9 -- EnMeer Date C nstruction Manager Date APPROV BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: t Director of Engineering ate Gene"I ounsel Date GUST K. NEWBERG CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ACCEPTED BY: zc,_: Contractor Date "F-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-5" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3 �..•l P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Fourteen (14) CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH & ALPER DATE December 11, 1991 JOB: GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-34-1 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 10,123.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - RENOVATE EXISTING CITY WATER METER The existing 6-inch city water meter (Reference: Detail V, 1Y17) was constructed without two 4-inch flanged connections necessary to test and calibrate the meter. The City of Fountain Valley required that two 4-inch connections be provided before they would supply city water to the new City Water Pump Station. The 4-inch connections altered the layout of the meter assembly which required fabrication of new pipe spools. The meter assembly was dismantled and constructed in the new layout. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1341-013) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 8,483.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - REVISIONS TO INDUSTRIAL WATER PIPING IN TUNNEL NO. 3 The contract drawings required that a 10-inch 3-way plug valve be installed in an existing low pressure di ester gas line in Tunnel No. 3 (Reference: Detail H, 1Y20�. The 6-inch industrial water line, routed above the low pressure gas line, interfered with the operation of the 3-way valve. This 6-inch industrial water line was removed from the existing gas compressor facility to Intersection K, and replaced with a 2-inch pipe routed to avoid interference with the valve's operation. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account. (Reference: FCO P1341-012) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,640.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 10,123.00 `WO" TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days "G-1". AGENDA ITEM #9(h)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER Page 2 of 3 C.O. NO. Fourteen (14) CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH & ALPER DATE December 11, 1991 JOB: GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-34-1 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time extension is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date February 27, 1990 Original Contract Time 730 Calendar Days Original Completion Date February 26, 1992 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 730 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date February 26, 1992 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 13,098,000.00 Prev. Auth. Chan es $ 278,403.00 This Change (Add? (Deduct) $ 10,123.00 Amended Contract Price $ 13,386,526.00 "G-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(h)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3 lllm,/ P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Fourteen (14) CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH & ALPER DATE December 11, 1991 JOB: GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-34-1 Board Authorization Date: December 11, 1991 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED BY: . ':zd '0 -S-ql Engineer Date APPROVED BY: erector of Engineering Date ZIEBARTH & ALPER ACCEPTED BY: RECOMMENDED BY: "�ep- 41e' Construction Manager Date APPROVED AS TO FORM: "G-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(h)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER Page 1 of 2 C.O. NO. Fifteen (15) CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH & ALPER DATE December 11, 1991 JOB: GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. .Pl-34-1 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ (20.000.00) In accordance with contract provisions; the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item l - RESOLUTION OF ISSUES REGARDING TOSHIBA MEDIUM VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR This item provides for acceptance of the Toshiba switchgear and includes a credit to the Districts for excessive time required by Districts personnel and consultants to review several Toshiba submittals. There will be no time extension, extended overhead or direct charges for review or review time necessary for the Toshiba medium voltage switchgear. The Districts maintains all rights to question, test and otherwise inspect the Toshiba switchgear to ensure it will meet the requirements set forth in the contract documents. DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (20,000.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ (20,000.00) TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date February 27, 1990 Original Contract Time 730 Calendar Days Original Completion Date February 26, 1992 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 730 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date February 26, 1992 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 13,098,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 288,526.00 This Change (Add) (D.edUt) $ (20,000.00) Amended Contract Price $ 13,366,526.00 AGENDA ITEM #9(h)(2) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 2 �J P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Fifteen (15) CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH & ALPER DATE December 11. 1991 JOB: GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-34-1 Board Authorization Date: December 11, 1991 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED BY: Enginee Date APPROV D BY: 2 ?2L �/—/el—J/ Director of Engineering Date ZIEBARTH & ALPER ACCEPTED BY: Contractor Date RECOMMENDED BY: vp- Cifistruction Manager Date APPROVED AS TO FORM: 0 Z"A'Al LCI 16ij Gen 1 Counsel Date "H-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(h)(2) — ALL DISTRICTS "H-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3 , P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Five (5) CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE December 11, 1991 Zurn Constructors, Inc. JOB: Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-3; Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-2; and Installation of Waste Digester Gas Flare Facilities at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-21 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 48,734.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Job No. P1-35-2 Item 1 - REMOVAL OF ADDITIONAL SLUDGE FROM DIGESTER NO. 9 As part of the Digester cleaning portion of Job No. P1-35-2, the Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10, the Contractor was to remove all grit and sludge contained in Digester No. 9. The amount specified under Section 53-0802 of the detailed specifications is 3,000 cubic yards. The actual quantity of remaining material in Digester 9 at the time of release was 3,520 cubic yards. This change order provides removal of 520 cubic yards of additional material from Digester 9. The work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 48,734.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 48,734.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this'Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. "I-1" AGENDA ITEM #9 0) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Five.(5) CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE December 11, 1991 Zurn Constructors, Inc. JOB: Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-3; Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-2; and Installation of Waste Digester Gas Flare Facilities at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-21 SUMMARY OF MILESTONE TIME Job No. P1-35-2 Original Contract Date January 28, 1991 Original Milestone Time 365 Calendar Days Original Milestone Completion Date January 27, 1992 Milestone Modification This Change Order 0 Calendar Days Total Milestone Modification 28 Calendar Days Revised Milestone Time 393 Calendar Days Revised Milestone Date February 24, 1992 Job No. J-21 Original Contract Date Original Milestone Time Original Milestone Completion Date Milestone Modification This Change Total Milestone Modification Revised Milestone Time Revised Milestone Date SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Job No. P1-34-3 Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension this C.O. Total Contract Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Final Completion Due Date Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Actual Final Completion Date M January 28, 1991 180 Calendar Days July 26, 1991 Order 0 Calendar Days 0 Calendar Days Not Applicable Not Applicable January 28, 1991 900 Calendar Days July 15, 1993 0 Calendar Days 12 Calendar Days 912 Calendar Days July 27, 1993 Not Applicable Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 27,205,378.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 338,255.54 This Change (Add) (8edu et) $ 48,734.00 Amended Contract Price $ 27,592,367.54 11I-2" AGENDA ITEM #9 H) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Five (5) CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE December 11, 1991 Zurn Constructors, Inc. JOB: Board Authorization Date: December 11, 1991 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITT BY: Engineer Date APPROVED BY: �' e /C)""" Director of Engi eering Date ADVANCO CONSTRUCTOR, DIVISION OF ZURN CONSTRUCTORS, INC. ACCEPTED BY: Contractor Date RECOM LADED BY: Coffstruction Manager Date APPROVED AS TO FORM: 6 4 G n ral Counsel Date 11 I-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(i) - ALL DISTRICTS HI-311 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Four (4) CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction DATE December 11, 1991 JOB: Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Broadway and Oran ethor e Avenue(including City of Anaheim Street Improvements), Contract No. 2-26-3; Katella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street Ninth Street Contract No. 2-28; and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Bede) $ 55,869.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Contract No. 2-26-3 Item 1 - CONNECT UNDISCLOSED SEWER LATERAL FROM GARDEN GROVE LIBRARY `..✓ The Contractor was directed to locate and connect an undisclosed sewer lateral for the Garden Grove Library. The contract documents required connection of one sewer lateral which was accomplished by the Contractor. Also, part of the contract work included plugging the old line where the lateral was originally connected. After plugging the old line a sewerage back-up occurred at the library. The Contractor was mobilized and directed to locate an additional old connection to the sewer which was abandoned and plugged. The Contractor located the undisclosed lateral by exploratory excavation and made a new connection. This work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 13,357.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days M Item 2 - UNDISCLOSED CONCRETE -ENCASED DUCTS The Contractor encountered two concrete -encased utility ducts not shown on the contract drawings at pipe station No. 9+30 in Roosevelt Avenue near the intersection of Roberta Avenue. The Contractor was directed to excavate carefully, protect the ducts and continue laying pipe beneath the encased utility ducts. This item of work was accomplished on a time and material basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,548.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "J-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(k)(1) - DISTRICT 2 "J-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Four (4) CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction DATE December 11, 1991 JOB: Item 3 - UNDISCLOSED ABANDONED CONCRETE SIPHON STRUCTURE The Contractor encountered an existing concrete -encased siphon structure which interfered with pipelaying. The structure consisted of two 15-inch clay pipes which were encased in concrete together. The structure was not shown on the contract drawings and was located between pipe station No. 70+68 and 71+00 in Euclid Street near the intersection of the 91 Freeway. The Contractor was directed to remove and dispose of the structure. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,144.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 - UNDISCLOSED CONCRETE -ENCASED STEEL CASING During removal of the existing 30-inch sewer in Euclid Street at the intersection of La Palma Avenue (pipe station No. 43+90 to 44+90) as called for on the contract drawings, the Contractor encountered a concrete -encased steel casing not shown on the contract drawings. Removal and disposal of this existing encased steel casing required additional time by the Contractor. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: "J-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(k)(1) - DISTRICT 2 $ 15,920.00 0 Calendar Days „J-2„ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 6 L...� P. 0. BOX 8127'- 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 \1� "J-3" CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Four (4) CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction DATE December 11, 1991 JOB: Item 5 - UNDISCLOSED WATER LINE The Contractor encountered an undisclosed 4-inch diameter existing water line in Euclid Street at the intersection of Glen Avenue (pipe station No. 49+80). The Contractor was directed to protect the existing water line in place and continue work around the utility. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,130.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 6 - UNDISCLOSED CONCRETE STRUCTURE The Contractor encountered an existing abandoned subsurface concrete structure which interfered with pipelaying. The structure was not shown on the contract drawings and was located at pipe station No. 64+10 in Euclid Street near the intersection of the 91 Freeway. The Contractor was directed to remove and dispose of the structure. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,857.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 7 - UNDISCLOSED STORM DRAIN BOX The Contractor encountered.an existing abandoned subsurface storm drain box structure which interfered with pipelaying. The structure was not shown on the contract drawings and was located at pipe station No. 66+50 in Euclid Street near the intersection of the 91 Freeway. The Contractor was directed to protect the existing storm drain box in place and continue work around the structure. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,144.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days AGENDA ITEM #9(k)(1) - DISTRICT 2 "J-311 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 6 " P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Four '(4) CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction DATE December 11, 1991 JOB: Item 8 - UNDISCLOSED ELECTRICAL CONDUIT The Contractor encountered a 2-inch diameter existing electrical conduit crossing the pipeline trench in Euclid Street at the intersection of the 91 Freeway (pipe station No. 68+40) and not shown on the contract drawings. The Contractor was directed to protect the existing electrical conduit in place and continue work around the utility. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)(2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,398.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 9 - UNDISCLOSED TV AND TELEPHONE CABLES The Contractor encountered a television cable and Sprint telephone cable crossing the pipeline trench in Euclid Street at the intersection of La Palma (pipe station No. 43+74) and not shown on the contract drawings. The Contractor was directed to protect the existing cables in place and continue work around the utilities. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: Item 10 - MANHOLE RELOCATION $ 3,359.00 0 Calendar Days The Contractor was directed to change the location of the 84-inch diameter manhole shown on the contract drawings at Station No. 43+30 in Euclid Street at the intersection of La Palma Avenue. The manhole location was moved to Station No. 43+24 due to interference with existing street light electrical conduits in the plan location. Additional work consisted of retrenching and relaying the 24-inch sewer tie-in from La Palma Avenue which had already been installed to the original manhole station shown on the contract drawings. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the _ General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 8,012.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "J-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(k)(1) - DISTRICT 2 "J-4" 1...� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Four (4) CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction DATE December 11, 1991 JOB: TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 55,869.00 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension this C.O. Total Contract Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Final Completion Due Date Actual Final Completion Date Time Subject to Liquidated Damages December 31, 1990 400 Calendar Days February 3, 1992 0 Calendar Days O Calendar Days 400 Calendar Days February 3, 1992 Not Applicable Not Applicable Original Contract Price $_7,953,755.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $_ 359,455.58 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $_ 55,869.00 Amended Contract Price $ 8,369,079.58 "J-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(k)(1) - DISTRICT 2 "J-5" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 6 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Four (4) CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction DATE December 11, 1991 JOB: Board Authorization Date: December 11, 1991 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED BY: RECOMMENDED BY: E ineer Date Construction Manager Date APPR ED Y: APPROV AS TO FORM: ff Lq11 D ector of Engineering Date Gen ral Counsel Date STEVE BUBALO CONSTRUCTION ACCEPTED BY: Contractor Date "J-6" AGENDA ITEM #9(k)(1) - DISTRICT 2 "J-6" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Five (5) CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction DATE December 11, 1991 JOB: Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 140,000.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. `..✓ Contract No. 2-26-3 Item 1 - BONUS PAYMENT, SECTIONS 5 AND 6 Contract Section 52-108 (Sections 5 and 6) specified a total of 115 days for completion of the pipeline section from Ca Palma Avenue to the Riverside Freeway (pipe station No. 43+30 to 73+40). A bonus of $2,000.00 is awarded by this contract for each day saved from the specified time of completion for this section of pipeline. The work was completed in 45 calendar days. The resulting bonus payment is based on 70 days at $2,000.00 per day. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: `m. $ 140,000.00 0 Calendar Days $ 140,000.00 0 Calendar Days "K-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(k)(2) - DISTRICT 2 "K-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Five (5) CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction DATE December 11, 1991 t: The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time'is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date December 31, 1990 Original Contract Time 400 Calendar Days Original Completion Date February 3, 1992 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 400 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date February 3, 1992 Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 7,953,755.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 415324.58 This Change (Add) (9gduc,) $ 140,000.00 Amended Contract Price $ 8,509,079.58 "K-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(k)(2) - DISTRICT 2 „K_2„ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Five (5) CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction DATE December 11, 1991 JOB: Board Authorization Date: December 11, 1991 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED BY: E gineer Date APP BY: irector of Engineering Date STEVE BUBALO CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDED BY: 4 'p- f=z' Construction Manager Date APPROVED TO FORM: 1. Gene al Counsel Date ACCEPTED BY: �' �Z�a o// Contractor Date "K-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(k)(2) - DISTRICT 2 "K-3" G RESOLUTION NO. 91-184-5 APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY WITH THE IRVINE COMPANY RE CONTRACT NO. 5-35-2 AND CONTRACT NO. 5-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY WITH THE IRVINE COMPANY REQUIRED IN CONNECTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF SOUTH COAST TRUNK SEWER, PHASE 2, CONTRACT NO. 5-35-2, AND CRYSTAL COVE PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-36 ***************** WHEREAS, District No. 5 requires a new pump station site and an access easement in connection with construction of Phase 2 of the South Coast Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-35-2, and proposed Crystal Cover Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36; and, WHEREAS, The Irvine Company (TIC) has previously granted a pump station site to District No. 5 for said pump station; and, WHEREAS, said granted pump station site cannot now be utilized by the District because of the realignment of the Pacific Coast Highway by Caltrans; and, WHEREAS, an agreement has been negotiated with The Irvine Company to provide for execution of a Grant Deed by TIC for the new pump station site; an Access Easement Agreement relative to the new pump station site; and an Easement Deed from TIC for the new sewer line in exchange for a Quitclaim Deed from District No. 5 for the previously -granted pump station site. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Agreement for Exchange of Property dated December 11, 1991, by and between The Irvine Company and County Sanitation FWA 11-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(1) - DISTRICT 5 11-1" 11 . District No. 5 of Orange County, required in connection with construction of and access to the South Coast Trunk Sewer, Phase 2, Contract No. 5-35-2, and the Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That said exchange of property shall be at no cost to the District nor The Irvine Company; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 11, 1991. "L-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(1) - DISTRICT 5 "L-2" limit 'PHIS^ ,VN COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS �~a l a,a4ieva � A�T'p ►= `� OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 d ae. 195� `y 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 NGE Coy (714) 962-2411 November 20, 1991 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 5 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,'California 92708-7018 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum No. 2 to Professional Services Agreement with The Keith Companies in Connection with South Coast Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-35, and Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36 In accordance with the District's procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee for Addendum No. 2 with The Keith Companies for the additional design services necessary for South Coast Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-35, and Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36, on an hourly -rate basis including labor plus overhead, direct expenses and fixed profit, plus subconsultants fee, in an amount not to exceed $45,107.00.j Existing Change per Amended Agreement Addn. No. Agreement Direct Labor, (hourly rates including labor plus overhead), not to exceed $142,050 $45,107 $187,157 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 0 0 0 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 6,000 0 6,000 Fixed Profit 13,200 0 13,200 Total Contract, Not to Exceed $161,250 $45,107 $206,357 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/Ruthelyn Plummer /s/Thomas M. Dawes Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman Thomas M. Dawes% District No. 5 Director of Engineering Selection Committee Selection Committee AGENDA ITEM #9(m)(1) — DISTRICT 5 limit u RESOLUTION NO. 91-185-5 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT WITH THE KEITH COMPANIES FOR DESIGN OF CONTRACT NOS. 5-35 AND 5-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE KEITH COMPANIES FOR DESIGN OF SOUTH COAST TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 5-35, AND CRYSTAL COVE PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-36, PROVIDING FOR ADDITIONAL DESIGN SERVICES FOR IMPROVEMENTS REQUESTED BY THE STATE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County has heretofore entered into an agreement with The Keith Companies for design and construction services required re South Coast Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-35, and Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to Agreement with The Keith Companies provided for changes in the scope of work initiated by The Irvine Company, City of Newport 11101-1 Beach and Laguna Beach County Water District relative to project alignment in Pacific Coast Highway and the construction schedules for said projects; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend said agreement with The Keith Companies to provide for additional design services for improvements requested by the State; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 on June 12, 1991, the Selection Committee has negotiated and certified a fee for said services, in accordance with established procedures for the selection of professional services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: '-.0 "N-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(m)(2) - DISTRICT 5 "N-1" Section 1. That Addendum No. 2 dated December 11, 1991, to that certain Professional Services Agreement dated May 11, 1988, by and between County Sanitation District No. 5 and The Keith Companies, for design and construction services required re South Coast Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-35, and Crystal Cover Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36, providing for additional design services for improvements requested by the State, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased by an amount not to exceed $45,107.00, as follows, increasing the maximum authorized compensation from $161,250.00 to an amount not to exceed $206,357.00: Existing Agreement Professional Services, at hourly rates for labor including overhead, not to exceed $142,050.00 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 6,000.00 Fixed Profit 13,200.00 TOTAL, not to exceed $161,250.00 Amended Addendum No. 2 Agreement $45,107.00 $187,157.00 -0- 6,000.00 -0- 13,200.00 $45,107.00 $206,357.00 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said addendum in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 11, 1991. "N-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(m)(2) - DISTRICT 5 "N-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER Page 1 of 2 C. 0. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: MITCHELL PACIFIC CONSTRUCTORS, INC. DATE December 11, 1991 JOB: Relocation Of Michelson Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-2 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 34,897.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - 12-INCH IRWD FORCE MAIN This item is for the construction of 280 L.F. of 12-inch IRWD force main from Michelson Pump Station across to Michelson Drive. The cost for this work will be reimbursed in full to the Districts by Irvine Ranch Water District. This item was negotiated with the Contactor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 34,897.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 34,897.00 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date August 7, 1991 Original Contract Time 330 Days Original Completion Date July 1, 1992 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time Not Applicable Revised Final Completion Due Date Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 1,827,136.00 Prev. Auth. Chan es $ 0.00 This Change (Add} (duct) $__ 34,897.00 Amended Contract Price $ 1,862,033.00 "0-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(n) - DISTRICT 7 110-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 2 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: MITCHELL PACIFIC CONSTRUCTORS, INC'. DATE December 11, 1991 JOB: Relocation of Michelson Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-2 Board Authorization Date: December 11, 1991 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED BY: '�gv- i�L En ineer Date APPROVED BY: d, "', /"' -el Director of Engineering Date MITCHELL PACIFIC CONSTRUCTORS, INC. ACCEPTED BY: c��LD��.. Contractor Date RECOMMENDED BY: �p l ,Construction Manager Date APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gener Counsel Date "0-211 AGENDA ITEM #9(n) - DISTRICT 7 110-2" Ll RESOLUTION NO. 91-186-7 APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT TO CONSTRUCT AND CONNECT TWO DISTRICT GRAVITY SEWERS TO IRWD's HARVARD AVENUE TRUNK SEWER A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT (IRWD) TO CONSTRUCT AND CONNECT TWO DISTRICT GRAVITY SEWERS TO IRWD'S HARVARD AVENUE TRUNK SEWER * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) proposes to construct a portion of their Harvard Avenue Trunk Sewer in the area adjacent to the easterly side of Cowan Heights and Lemon Heights; and, WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. 7 desires to abandon pump stations on the eastern slope of the Tustin Hills area, adjacent to Cowan Heights and Lemon Heights, and to build gravity sewers from said pump stations to connect to the IRWD Harvard Avenue Trunk Sewer; and, WHEREAS, public inconvenience can be minimized and a cost savings can be realized by including construction of the District's laterals for the Bent Tree Lane and Overhill Drive pump stations in IRWD's project for the Harvard Avenue Trunk Sewer. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Reimbursement Agreement dated December 11, 1991, by and between County Sanitation District No. 7 and Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD), providing for -reimbursement of costs to construct and connect two District gravity sewers from abandoned Bent Tree Lane and Overhill Drive_ pump stations to IRWD's Harvard Avenue Trunk Sewer, is hereby approved and "P-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(o) - DISTRICT 7 "P-1" 0 accepted; and, Section 2. That said cooperative project shall be administered by IRWD,. in accordance with the terms and conditions of the agreement; and, Section 3. That County Sanitation District No. 7 shall pay.all costs associated with construction and connection of said laterals to IRWD's Harvard Avenue Trunk Sewer upon completion and acceptance of the work as complete, including construction costs, construction permits, inspection, administration, surveying and materials testing, estimated to total $60,000.00; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 11, 1991. "P-211 AGENDA ITEM #9(o) - DISTRICT 7 "P-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA \%Wo� 11..� October 14, 1991 STAFF SUMMARY Draft Supplement No. 2 to Program Environmental Impact Report on Amendment No. I to 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan RE Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30 Background 10844 ELLIS AVENUE P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 (7141 982-2411 The master plan for the collection and conveyance systems constructed and operated by the Sanitation Districts underwent a comprehensive update in 1989. At that time, a new published master plan (1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan) consolidated all of the individual District's master plans and integrated them into a single master plan which included all aspects of the Districts' operations. The completion of the master plan for trunk sewers involved extensive coordination with the cities and special sewering districts within the Sanitation Districts' service area to ascertain the most up-to-date land use plans. Since these plans are in a constant state of revision, periodical updates and reviews by the Sanitation Districts are required, and the Master Plan is periodically revised or amended as needed. The amendments entail completion of an engineering report and appropriate CEQA compliance documentation. Proposed Memory Lane Interceptor The need for updating the master plan for the proposed Memory Lane Interceptor sewer system became apparent after the proposed land use changes for the Main Place Commercial Center and Main Street Concourse were evaluated in the context of other major projects occurring in the north Santa Ana and Orange areas. The Sanitation Districts authorized Boyle Engineering Corporation to prepare an engineering project report recommending an amendment to the Master Plan. This report, completed in June 1991 by Boyle, was entitled "Project Report --Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30" (Boyle Engineering, 1991). The project report evaluated various alternatives for meeting the sewer needs in these portions of the City of Santa Ana and City of Orange and recommended the construction of a new trunk sewer along Memory Lane to connect to the Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI). This 2.2-mile long sewer will relieve current deficiencies in capacity within the local collection sewers of the Cities of Orange and Santa Ana and eliminate the need for construction of a new District No. 1 trunk sewer from Main Place to the existing North Bristol Trunk Sewer, and a new local collection sewer in La Veta.Avenue from the beginning of the Orange Subtrunk to Batavia Street. These two projects were estimated to cost the Sanitation Districts about $3.6 million while the Memory Lane Interceptor is "Q-1" AGENDA ITEM #35 - DISTRICTS 1 & 2 "Q-1" estimated to cost $4.1 million and would be funded jointly by the Sanitation Districts ($2.1 million shared approximately equally by Districts Nos. 1 and 2), the City of Santa Ana ($1.3 million) and the City of Orange ($700,000), with the Sanitation Districts retaining ownership and responsibility for maintaining the new sewer facility. The construction of the new interceptor will eliminate all marginal deficiencies within the Santa Ana systems, reduce the amount of flow needed to be diverted to the District No. 1 Raitt Street Trunk Sewer, utilize excess capacity in the SARI and preserve current excess capacity in the District No. 1 facilities. CEQA Actions In July 1991, the Directors approved a professional services agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation to provide design and environmental services for the Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30. Based on the Initial Study and Environmental Assessment, a decision was made to prepare a supplemental environmental impact report to the previously adopted Master Plan EIR. On July 18, 1991 the Districts issued a Notice of Preparation (NOP) indicating that a supplement would be prepared which would analyze the potential environmental impacts resulting from the proposed Memory Lane Interceptor project. This supplement addresses the final alignment, sizing and design of the proposed trunk sewer facilities and the environmental impacts associated with the project. The intent of this supplemental EIR is two -fold. First, it is to provide an environmental basis for the decision -making process through the identification of those direct and indirect environmental effects which may result from the proposed construction of the project. And a second purpose l s to develop appropriate mitigation measures which can be incorporated into any subsequent discretionary actions on the project to minimize potential environmental impacts associated therewith. This EIR Supplement reflects the latest proposed changes in the regional sewerage collection system to maximize use of existing facilities, reduce long-term costs, and most importantly, to minimize environmental impacts associated with the construction of new sewerage collection facilities in the Cities of Santa Ana and Orange. This supplement has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., and Administrative Code Section 15000 et seq., as amended. The Districts are the Lead Agency for this supplement with principal responsibility for approving the required entitlements of the proposed project and implementing construction and environmental impact mitigation. The latter will be achieved through adoption of a resolution once the 45-day review period and public hearing process are completed, in February 1992, approving a final EIR and various mitigation measures to be implemented through a mitigation monitoring program. Appropriate mitigation measures will be incorporated into the Findings and Mitigation Monitoring Plan adopted by the Districts' Boards of Directors. Subsequently, they will be incorporated into any design specifications for the approved project. "Q-2" AGENDA ITEM #35 - DISTRICTS 1 & 2 "Q-2" Project Objectives and Project Descriation The new pipeline is required to provide additional capacity for sewerage generated by new high density land uses in the vicinity of Main Place and the Town and Country Center at the border between the Cities of Santa Ana and Orange. These changes in land use were approved by the cities subsequent to the completion of the 1989 Master Plan EIR and hence constitute a change in the identified long-term needs for regional collector sewer facilities. The generated flows are consistent with those projected in the Master Plan in terms of treatment plant capacity. The project consists of construction of a new 36-inch diameter regional collector sewer to be named the Memory Lane Interceptor which is designated Contract No. 2-30, by County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 and 2. The Memory Lane Interceptor will be used to convey untreated wastewater from the Cities of Santa Ana and Orange to Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley. The pipeline will occupy a narrow corridor under existing surface streets and acquired rights -of -way and easements extending a total distance of approximately 12,000 feet. The development of the project has required close coordination with the'Cities of Santa Ana and Orange, CALTRANS, and a host of other agencies to assure coordinated planning due to the large number of transportation improvements, development proposals and flood protection projects planned in the area of the project. �r! The proposed alignment is close to residential areas and recreational facilities (River View Golf Course, Santa Ana River Trail, Santiago Park and Lawn Bowling Association facilities) and thus will have some significant adverse impacts of a short-term duration during the actual construction period. There do not appear to be any significant environmental impacts associated with the project which cannot be mitigated to a level of insignificance. Most work is within surface streets, and impacts are traffic and noise related. The crossing of the Santa Ana River will require permitting from several agencies and will impact the public golf course located within the river bottom. ENG/D2/30:SR1 1� -3- "Q-3" AGENDA ITEM #35 - DISTRICTS 1 & 2 "Q-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 39 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON NOVEMBER 13, 1991 P,t�j ATIO�, ,� `iapp4ilan 0`o JC4� OMA. 5. (j ��are 19Sq �NGE COO ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA \1v� \laol� ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on November 13, 1991, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows. - ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: x Dan Griset, Chairman Robert Richardson x Charles E. Puckett, Chairman pro tem Richard B. Edgar x Fred Barrera Gene Beyer x Roger Stanton Don R. Roth x James A. Wahner James Ferryman DISTRICT NO. 2: x Iry Pickler, Chairman Fred Hunter x John Collins, Chairman pro tem George Scott x Fred Barrera Gene Beyer x Bob Bell Barry Denes x Buck Catlin Chris Norby x William D. Mahoney H. Flora x Robert H. Main _James Norman Culver a Carrey J. Nelson Glenn Parker a Arthur G. Newton Carol Downey x Miguel Pulido Dan Griset x Mark Schwing John M. Gullixson x Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 3: x Sal A. Sapien, Chairman Harry M. Dotson x Peter Green, Chairman pro tem Earle Robitaille x Walter K. Bowman Cecilia L. Age x Buck Catlin Chris Norby x John Collins George Scott x Norman Culver Robert H. Main x Burnie Dunlap Carrey J. Nelson x James V. Evans Margie L. Rice x James H. Flora William D. Mahoney x Don R. Griffin Rhonda J. McCune x Frank Laszlo Edna Wilson x Pat McGuigan Robert Richardson x Keith A. Nelson Eva G. Miner x Iry Pickler Fred Hunter x Roger Stanton Don R. Roth x Charles Sylvia Alice Jempsa DISTRICT NO. 5: x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman Evelyn Hart x Don R. Roth, Chairman pro tem Roger Stanton x Phil Sansone John C. Cox, Jr. DISTRICT NO. 6: x James A. Wahner, Chairman Dick Sherrick x Don R. Roth, Chairman pro tem Roger Stanton x Evelyn Hart Ruthelyn Plummer DISTRICT NO. 7: x Richard B. Edgar, Chairman Charles E. Puckett x James A. Wahner, Chairman pro tem Nate Reade x Fred Barrera Gene Beyer x John C. Cox, Jr. Ruthelyn Plummer x Robert Richardson Miguel Pulido x Don R. Roth Roger Stanton a Sally Anne Sheridan Barry Hammond DISTRICT NO. 11: x Grace Winchell, Chairman Linda Moulton -Patterson x Jack Kelly, Chairman pro tem Jim Silva x Roger Stanton Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 13: x William D. Ehrle, Chairman Fred Hunter x Fred Barrera, Chairman pro tem Gene Beyer x John M. Gullixson Mark Schwing Glenn Parker x Burnie Dunlap x Don R. Roth Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 14: a Peer A. Swan, Chairman Darryl Miller a Sally Anne Sheridan Barry Hammond x Fred Barrera, Chairman pro tem Gene Beyer x Leslie A. Pontious Richard B. Edgar x Don R. Roth Roger Stanton -2- 11/13/91 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita J. Brown, Board Secretary, Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle, Corinne Clawson, Gary Hasenstab, Ed Hodges, John Linder, Margie Nellor, Charles Nichols, Bob Ooten, Mary Simpson Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Jamel Demir, Bill Knopf, Mary Lee, Kris Lindstrom, John Shaw, Phil Stone * * * * * * * * * * * * * DISTRICT 14 In the absence of Chairman Peer Appointment of Chairman pro tem A. Swan and Chairman pro tem Sally Anne Sheridan, Director Fred Barrera was appointed Chairman pro tem of District No. 14. ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Mahoney reported that Report of the Joint Chairman on November 5th he and the staff hosted ten key South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) officials and Directors for a presentation on the Districts' wastewater management program and tour of the Districts' facilities. Former Director Hank Wedaa also attended as a SCAQMD Director and made several positive remarks about the Districts' operation. The Joint Chairman stated that Mr. Wedaa has been instrumental in helping find common ground for the Air District and Sanitation Districts' in meeting their respective environmental goals. Chairman Mahoney then announced that due to a League of Cities meeting conflict, the Special Joint Works Selection Committee scheduled for November 14th at 5:30 p.m. would be rescheduled for Friday, November 22nd. Tentatively, they will also meet on Thursday, December 12th at 5:30 p.m. and Thursday, December 19th at 5:30 p.m. He also announced a District 5 Selection Committee meeting on Wednesday, November 20th, at 8:00 a.m.; a District 3 Selection Committee meeting on Wednesday, November 20th, at 5:30 p.m.; a Fiscal Policy Committee meeting on Wednesday, November 20th, at 5:30 p.m.; and a Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee meeting on Thursday, November 21st, at 6:00 p.m. Responding to a question about Selection Committees, Chairman Mahoney stated that the Selection Committee was comprised of each District's Chairman and Chairman pro tem who meet to discuss matters pertaining to engagement of professional services. The primary role of the Selection Committee is to review proposals and make recommendations to the Board for engineering and architectural professional services contracts. The Selection Committee functions under a formal policy that has been established by the Boards of Directors. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Manager has provided to not only our Districts attempting to arrive at more workable stated that his counterparts at other The General Manager reiterated the Joint Chairman's comments about the assistance that former Director Wedaa but other POTW's in the region in air quality issue solutions. He also POTW's share in that view. r-. -3- 11/13/91 The General Manager then reported that two separate special reports had been mailed to the Directors since the last Board meeting. One of the reports was his annual "State of the Districts' Report". He thanked the Directors for their feedback and positive comments. The other report mailed covered two separate incidents. The first incident was a gasoline spill into the Districts' sewers in the City of La Habra that occurred in early October. He noted that a further report would be given on this incident later in the meeting. Mr. Sylvester stated that he wanted to extend special thanks, however, to Source Control, Collection Facilities and Engineering staff for their efforts in averting what was a potentially disastrous situation on Imperial Highway due to the spill. The second incident was a sewage spill in the vicinity of The City on October 30th. There were, however, no public health nor environmental impacts. Mr. Sylvester further reported that in July the Directors were given a report on the results of a study of air toxic risk analyses on the Districts' treatment plants, as required by AB 2588, which is the State's Toxics Hotspots Information and Assessment Act of 1987. He stated that a supplemental report would be mailed to the Directors in the next few days. He pointed out that articles on AB 2588 had appeared recently in the local news media. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Counsel session. DISTRICT 1 Approval of Minutes the Chairman ordered that said minutes DISTRICT 2 Approval of Minutes the Chairman ordered that said minutes DISTRICT 3 Approval of Minutes the Chairman ordered that said minutes DISTRICT 5 Approval of Minutes the Chairman ordered that said minutes DISTRICT 6 Approval of Minutes the Chairman ordered that said minutes tia..r1 -4- The General Counsel stated he would review and report in detail on the Montrose litigation during closed There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held October 9, 1991, be deemed approved, as mailed. There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held October 9, 1991, be deemed approved, as mailed. There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held October 9, 1991, be deemed approved, as mailed. There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held October 9, 1991, be deemed approved, as mailed. There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held October 9, 1991, be deemed approved, as mailed. 11/13/91 DISTRICT 7 Approval of Minutes the Chairman ordered that said minutes DISTRICT 11 Approval of Minutes the Chairman ordered that said minutes DISTRICT 13 Approval of Minutes the Chairman ordered that said minutes DISTRICT 14 Approval of Minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held October 9, 1991, be deemed approved, as mailed. the Chairman ordered that said minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held October 9, 1991, be deemed approved, as mailed. There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held October 9, 1991, be deemed approved, as mailed. There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held October 9, 1991, be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 10/09/91 10/23/91 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 490,542.51 $ 751,484.89 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 5,228,191.45 1,217,241.57 Joint Working Capital Fund - 215,660.61 283,975.09 Self -Funded Insurance Funds - 3,407.14 4,480.68 DISTRICT NO. 1 DISTRICT NO. 2 DISTRICT NO. 3 DISTRICT NO. 5 DISTRICT NO. 6 DISTRICT NO. 7 DISTRICT NO. 11 DISTRICT NO. 13 DISTRICT NO. 14 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - -0- 4,665.14 - 4,063.53 611,305.91 - 42,822.93 86,826.45 - 1,266.64 123,910.83 - 9,420.18 255.28 - 8,804.99 418,885.72 - 25,222.53 15,100.85 - -0- 76.78 - 6,531.51 255,059.44 - -0- 7,046.62 - 8,577.45 -0- - 100.54 4,853.65 -5- 6,044,612.01 3,785,168.90 11/13/91 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: , Awarding Purchase of One 1 Fourier Infrared Spectrometer, That the bid tabulation and Specification No. E-202, to recommendation re Purchase of One (1) Perkin-Elmer Corporation Fourier Infrared Spectrometer, Specification No. E-202, be, and is hereby received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the bid of Mattson Instruments, Inc. be, and is hereby, rejected as not meeting the specifications; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Perkin-Elmer Corporation for a total amount not to exceed $65,575.00 plus sales tax and freight. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Fisons Instruments for Purchase of -One (1) BNA Gas Chromato raph/Mass Spectrometer System (Specification No. E-210) System (Specification No. E-210). ALL DISTRICTS Awarding purchase order contract for Landscape Maintenance, �..� Specification No. M-034, to Toyo Landscaping Company be, and is hereby, received and Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to Fisons Instruments in the amount of $159,900.00 plus sales tax and freight, for Purchase of One (1) BNA Gas Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the bid tabulation and recommendation re award of purchase order contract for Landscape Maintenance, Specification No. M-034, ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase order contract be, and is hereby, awarded to Toyo Landscaping Company for a one-year period beginning December 1, 1991, for the maximum annual amount of $45,772.48, with option for three one-year extensions. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for, That Change Order No. 4 to the plans Job No. J-19-1 and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, authorizing a net deduction of $34,836.00 from the contract with Hunter Corporation for four items of added or deleted work, and granting a time extension of seven calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 7 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 7 to the plans Job No. J-19-2 and.specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-19-2, authorizing an addition of $221,857.11 to the contract with Brinderson Corporation for five items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. 10 11/13/91 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 1 to the plans Job No. J-23-1 and specifications for Control Center/Operations and Maintenance Building, Job No. J-23-1, authorizing an addition of $3,392.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for three items of additional work, and granting a time extension of 11 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 14 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 14 to the plans Job No. P1-33 and specifications for Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33, authorizing an addition of $121,931.00 to the contract with Gust K. Newberg Construction Company for one item of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-2 Approving Change Order No. 13 to Moved, seconded and duly carried: the plans and specifications for Job No. P1-34-2 That Change Order No. 13 to the plans and specifications for Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-2, authorizing an addition of $71,404.72 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc., for 17 items of additional work, and granting a time extension of 54 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. Accepting Job No. P1-34-2 as Moved, seconded and duly carried: complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 91-172, accepting Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-2, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 4 to the plans Job Nos. P1-34-3, P1-35-2 and J-21 and specifications for Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No.' P1-34-3; Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-2; and Installation of Waste Digester Gas Flare Facilities at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-21, authorizing an addition of $27,080.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. for nine items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. -7- 11/13/91 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 2 to the plans Job No. P2-42-1 and specifications for Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-1, authorizing an addition of $30,866.00 to the contract with Ziebarth & Alper and C. S. Alper Construction Co., Inc. for four items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement That the Selection Committee with John Carollo Engineers for certification of the final negotiated design of Digesters Nos. 11-16, fee relative to Addendum No. 3 to the Sludge and Gas Handling Facilities Professional Services Agreement with at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job John Carollo Engineers for design of No. P1-34 Digesters Nos. 11-16, Sludge and Gas Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34, (subsequently divided into Job Nos. P1-34-1, P1-34-2 and P1-34-3) to provide for additional design and construction support services required because of additional work necessary to coordinate with other master -planned projects, extra services because of splitting the project into three jobs, delay in project completion and to fill in for Districts' staffing shortages, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 91-173, approving Addendum No. 3 to said agreement with John Carollo Engineers for said additional services, on an hourly -rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses and fixed profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $250,000.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $3,659,332.00 to an amount not to exceed $3,909,332.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement That the Selection Committee with Dames & Moore to conduct certification of the final negotiated Seismic Study Element of fee relative to Addendum No. 1 to the Miscellaneous Improvements to Professional Services Agreement with Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job Dames & Moore to conduct Seismic No. P1-38-3, and Seismic Study Study Element of Miscellaneous Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant Improvements to Facilities at No. 1, Job No. P1-38-3, and Seismic Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-2 Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-2, expanding the scope of work to include preparation of plans and specifications for Seismic Retrofitting of Headworks B and C at Plant No. 2, Job No. P243-2-1, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER -MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 91-174, approving Addendum No. 1 to said agreement with Dames & Moore for said additional services, on an hourly -rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $380,620.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $460,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $840,620.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. 11/13/91 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement That the Selection Committee with Ecosystems Engineering & certification of the final negotiated Analyses for ecological consulting fee relative to Addendum No. 1 to the and statistical data analyses Professional Services Agreement with , services Ecosystems Engineering & Analyses for ecological consulting and statistical data analyses services, providing for a one-year extension of the term of said agreement and revision of the hourly -rate fee schedule, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 91-175, approving Addendum No. 1 to said agreement with Ecosystems Engineering & Analyses for said additional services, on an hourly -rate -basis for labor including overhead and profit, plus technical and clerical staff services, materials and supplies, and travel and lodging, for an additional amount not to exceed $243,273.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $142,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $385,273.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file Summons and First Amended Third -Party Complaint of Simpson Paper Company re litigation entitled U.S. Government, et al. v. Montrose Chemical, et al., Case No. CV 90 3122 AAH JRx of California, Case No. CV 90 3122 and ordered filed; and, Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Summons and First Amended Third -Party Complaint of Simpson Paper Company relative to litigation entitled U.S. Government, et al. v. Montrose Chemical, et al., U.S. District Court, Central District AAH (JRx), be, and is hereby, received FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. ALL DISTRICTS Receive, file and approve written reports of the Fiscal Policy Committee and Executive Committee Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the written reports of the Fiscal Policy Committee'.s and Executive Committee's meetings held on October 16, 1991 and October 23, 1991, respectively, be, and are hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. , DISTRICTS 1, 2 & 3 Approving First Supplemental Trust Agreement and Amendment No. 1 to Acquisition Agreement relative to the 1986 Certificates of Participation debt issue 1986 Certificates of Participation rather than semi-annual payments to Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt the following resolutions approving First Supplemental Trust Agreement and Amendment No. 1 to Acquisition Agreement relative to the debt issue, providing for annual payments the trustee for principal: DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. 1 91-176-1 2 91-177-2 3 91-178-3 Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. 11/13/91 ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing staff to conduct research project re Development �..� and Application of Molecular Techniques to Detect Indicator and Pathogenic Microorganisms in Treated Wastewater and, Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to conduct a research project re Development and Application of Molecular Techniques to Detect Indicator and Pathogenic Microorganisms in Treated Wastewater; FURTHER MOVED: That application to the National Water Research Institute for co -funding of said research project be, and is hereby, authorized; and, FURTHER MOVED: That an expenditure of up to $453,918.00 for the two-year project, with $226,959.00 to be reimbursed by the Institute, be, and is hereby, authorized. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,11 & 13 Authorizing the General Manager to issue a purchase order to the Orange County Assessor's Office for purchase of Assessor's property database database, in an amount not to exceed Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to the Orange County Assessor's Office for a one-time purchase of the Assessor's property $956,860.00; and, FURTHER MOVED: That payment of annual costs of property characteristic updates for 1990-91 in an amount not to exceed $98,200.00, and purchase of future annual property characteristic updates in accordance with -unit charges, not to exceed actual costs, as established by the Orange County Board of Supervisors, be, and are hereby, authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing staff to solicit proposals for the resale of 27 tons of surplus off -site, non -methane hydrocarbons (NHMC air emission credits credits, and to report back to the ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit proposals for design of Job No. J-25-1. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized and directed to solicit proposals for the resale of 27 tons of surplus off -site, non -methane hydrocarbons (NHMC) air emission Executive Committee. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Selection Committee (expanded to include three additional Directors appointed by the Joint Chairman) be, and is hereby, authorized to solicit proposals from Boyle Engineering Corporation/John Carollo Engineers, a Joint Venture; James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers, Inc..; and RJN Computer Services/Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers, a Joint Venture, for design of Computerized Facilities' Records.and Drawing System, Job No. J-25-1, and to interview said firms and negotiate a Professional Services Agreement for said work for consideration by the Boards at a future meeting. ,'r✓ -10- 11/13/91 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written report of the Building Committee That the written report of the Building Committee meeting held on October 30, 1991, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications for Job No. P2-23-5-1 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 91-182, approving plans and specifications for Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Director John Collins then requested that his vote opposing the motion be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Staff Report re Procedures for Professional That the Staff Report dated Consulting Services Selection, Plan October 17, 1991 (Revised) re Checking and Insurance Requirements Procedures for Professional Consulting Services Selection, Plan Checking and Insurance Requirements, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the General Counsel to file an administrative complaint That the General Counsel be, and is with the State Architectural hereby, authorized to file an Licensing Board against Pulaski administrative complaint with the and Arita, Inc. re Job No. J-7-4 State Architectural Licensing Board against Pulaski and Arita, Inc. relative to Job No. J-7-4, Administration Building Addition. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Convene in closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 The Boards convened in closed session at 7:54 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9. Minutes of the portion of this Board meeting held in closed session are contained in the Districts' Confidential Minutes book, as authorized by California Government Code Section 54957.2. ALL DISTRICTS At 8:26 p.m. the Boards reconvened in Reconvene in regular session regular session. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8.:27 p.m., November 13, 1991. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:27 p.m., November 13, 1991. -11- 11/13/91 111� LW -WA DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications for Contract No. 7-3E-2 That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 91-179-7, approving plans and specifications for Irvine -Newport Subtrunk Relief Sewer, Contract No. 7-3E-2, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Receive and file request for annexation and authorizing initiation of proceedings re proposed Annexation No. 142 - Kendler Annexation and Clark Street in unincorporated received and ordered filed; and, Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the petition from Oswald Kendler requesting annexation of 1.28 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity southeast of the intersection of Orange Park Boulevard County territory, be, and is hereby, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 91-180-7 authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District (proposed Annexation No. 142 - Kendler Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:27 p.m., November 13, 1991. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:27 p.m., November 13, 1991. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:27 p.m., November 13, 1991. DISTRICT 11 Actions re Sewer Service Agreement with Signal Bolsa Corporation (proposed Annexation No. 19 to District 11 Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering reported that in April 1987, staff and General Counsel were authorized to meet with the owners of approximately 1,600 acres of the Bolsa Chica area, led by the principal landowner, Signal Bolsa Corporation, and negotiate an agreement pertaining to annexation of the territory to District No. 11. The -12- 11/13/91 Bolsa Chica area is presently outside District No. 11's boundary but within its' sphere of influence. The major landowner has had ongoing negotiations with the County of Orange, City of Huntington Beach and District No. 11 pertaining to development issues, including the timely construction of sewerage service facilities. The proposed Slater Avenue Pump Station is presently under design to serve portions of Districts Nos. 3 and 11. Capacity has been included in the design for the Bolsa Chica area as authorized by the Board in January 1991. Of the 1,600 acres, about 340 acres are proposed for development of which slightly over 300 acres are owned by Signal Bolsa. The rest will remain as wetlands. Signal Bolsa principals, their management company, The Koll Company,, District's staff and District's Counsel have met over the past several years to develop the necessary agreement. After numerous delays caused by the indecision of the landowner, Mr. Dawes stated that the agreement is now complete and ready for consideration by the Directors. The agreement provides for a $250,000.00 payment 30 days after approval plus an additional payment of $500,000.00 within 180 days after commencement of construction of the Slater Avenue Pump Station. The balance, totaling approximately $1,500,000.00 would be paid within 30 days upon certification and approval of a development plan expected to be approved by the City of Huntington Beach. The main provisions of the agreement are summarized as follows: Payment of the initial annexation fees which can be used for the upsizing of master -planned sewer facilities Deferred annexation of parcels owned by others. Sewer service will not be offered until the annexation fees are paid at the rates in effect at the time sewer service is desired. Small parcel annexations can be avoided in the future by including the parcels now. - District will provide sewer service to the property, to the extent possible, including environmental documentation necessary for the annexation and sewer construction. - All costs of annexation to be paid by the landowner. Preannexation deposits will be credited at the current annexation rate, based on the rate assuming no allocation of real property tax revenues. To the extent that such tax revenues are negotiated with the County, the annexation fees/area annexed will be adjusted. - Provision for exclusion of non -urban areas from annexation (no sewer service without annexation) and deferral of annexation fees. - In the event of agreement termination by the landowner, -funds not expended or encumbered by the District as of the date of the notice of termination shall be refunded with interest at 7%. Expended funds will be paid back to the extent possible, and only to the extent that the said facilities could be used by the District. -13- 11/13/91 ONA Approving Sewer Service Agreement Moved, seconded and duly carried: with Signal Bolsa Corporation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 91-181-11, approving Sewer Service Agreement with Signal Bolsa Corporation (by The Koll Company, its Managing Agent) re funding and construction of master -planned sewerage facilities to serve the Bolsa Chica area, providing for prepayment of annexation fees for proposed Annexation No. 19 to District No. 11, and guaranteeing sewer service for development of a portion of the Bolsa Chica property. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Director Roger. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on the motion be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ad j o.0 rnment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m., November 13, 1991. DISTRICT 3 Actions re Emergency Repairs and Vapor Extraction re Miller -Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-4C-R, and Emergency Repairs and Vapor Extraction re Imperial Relief Interceptor, Reaches 22 and 23, Contract No. 3-19R Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering reported that the District was notified in early October of high levels of hydrocarbons being emitted from manholes in Imperial Highway in La Habra. When staff investigated, it was found that gasoline vapors above explosion levels were present in the District's two sewers within Imperial Highway. Both sewers had high petroleum vapor levels. He advised that staff then began, on an emergency basis, to evacuate the vapors in the lines by installing blowers. CALTRANS assumed overall job responsibilities since Imperial Highway is a state highway. While investigations took place during the next two weeks to find the source of contamination, vapor extraction continued. Imperial Highway eastbound, or portions thereof between Idaho and Walnut Streets, remained closed. Mr. Dawes advised the source has been identified as a leaking gasoline line from a United Oil Company service station located near the intersection of Imperial Highway west of Euclid Street. District's staff exposed one of the lines and found gasoline products soaking the line's backfill. Vapors from this gasoline were entering the sewer. After the lines were cleaned and televised, leaks were found on many of the joints. The leaking joints were then repaired in place by forcing chemical grout through the joints under high pressure in an around -the -clock emergency effort. Repairs were completed October 12, and Imperial Highway was then restored to full traffic. -14- 11/13/91 The Director of Engineering reported that the repair cost is estimated not to exceed $90,000.00, and that a portion of the costs might be recoverable from the service station owner. Mr. Dawes then requested that emergency purchase orders issued for the repairs by staff, pursuant to the Districts' procurement procedures, be ratified. He also requested authorization for staff and District's General Counsel to investigate the possibility of cost recovery from the owner of the service station property. Ratifying action of staff in Moved, seconded and duly carried: issuing emergency purchase orders for Contract No. 3-4C-R and That the action of staff in Contract No. 3-19R issuing emergency purchase orders in a total amount not to exceed $90,000.00 for Emergency Repairs and Vapor Extraction re Miller -Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-4C-R, and Emergency Repairs and Vapor Extraction re Imperial Relief Interceptor, Reaches 22 and 23, Contract No. 3-19R, be, and is hereby, ratified. Authorizinq staff and General Counsel to investigate and seek cost recovery for emergency work from the owner of the United Oil Co. service station which leaked petroleum around the sewers petroleum around the sewers, causing Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff and General Counsel be, and are hereby, authorized and directed to investigate and seek appropriate cost recovery from the owner of the United Oil Co. service station which leaked the problem and emergency work. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:34 p.m., November 13, 1991. DISTRICTS 1 & 2 Actions re Supplement No. 2 to Program EIR on Amendment No. 1 to the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan re Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30 Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering reported that in 1989 the Directors approved the comprehensive, updated Districts' wastewater management program and master plan which provided for facilities necessary to meet flow increases and regulatory discharge requirements for the next 30 years. Also approved was a program environmental impact report which addressed most of the master -planned projects. Because of significant changes made for the proposed Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30, additional CEQA environmental review was required. -15- 11/13/91 He further reported that this project would be an alternative to other various major sewer construction projects by the cities of Santa Ana and Orange and Districts 1 and 2. Mr. Dawes stated that the project would begin at the Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI) line, extend easterly under the Santa Ana River and in Memory Lane to Parker Street and north in Parker Street to La Veta Avenue. The final terminus would be the intersection of Batavia Street and La Veta Avenue, and would intercept major sewers in the City of Orange, eliminating the need to build parallel sewers to the Orange Subtrunk and city sewers in La Veta Avenue. It would also reserve existing capacity in District 1 sewers and avoid the need to build planned City of Santa Ana sewers that would deliver water to the Districts' trunks in Main Street and Bristol Street. The cost of the project is estimated at $4.1 million, to be shared by the four participating entities. Mr. Dawes then reviewed the actions taken thus far with regard to CEQA requirements. In response to questions concerning difficult traffic congestion already in this area, the Director of Engineering advised that letters would be mailed to all residents in the area advising them of the upcoming construction and suggested alternate routes. He further stated they would conduct various public information workshops for those people commuting in that area. Receive and file comments received Moved, seconded and duly carried: on the Notice of Preparation of Supplement No. 2 to Program EIR That the comments received on the Notice of Preparation of Supplement No. 2 to Program EIR on Amendment No. 1 to the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan re Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30, be, and are hereby, received and ordered file. Receive and file Staff Report and Draft Supplement No. 2 to Program EIR Moved, seconded and duly carried: That th October Supplement No. 2 to Program EIR on Amendment Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30, be, and ordered filed. Authorizing the General Manager to file a Notice of Completion of Draft Supplement No. 2 to Program EIR e Staff Report dated 14, 1991 and Draft No. 1 to the 1989 Master Plan re Memory are hereby, received and Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to file a Notice of Completion of Draft Supplement No. 2 to said Program EIR. Fixing the date, time and place for Moved, seconded and duly carried: public hearing on Draft Supplement No. 2 to Program EIR That December 11, 1991, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Office, be, and are hereby, fixed as the date, time and place for public hearing on Draft Supplement No. 2 to said Program EIR. L.✓ -16- 11/13/91 Establishing December 31, 1991 as Moved, seconded and duly carried: the final date for receipt of — comments on Draft Supplement No. 2 That December 31, 1991, be, and to Program EIR is hereby, established as the final date for which all comments must be received on Draft Supplement No. 2 to said Program EIR. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:40 p.m., November 13, 1991. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:40 p.m., November 13, 1991. Secretary of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 -17- m x bd --I FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/02/91 PAGE I REPORT NUMBE4 AP43 _.COUNTY_SANII.AIION OLSTRICTS_OF-ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/09/91 POSTING DATE 10/09/91 WARRANT ND._ _-_-VENQDH._ AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 117328 ABM BUSINESS MACHINES Sb0.45 OFFICE MACHINE REPAIR --ELECTRONICS.--. INC_ __--- s16 R . 9 0 INSTRUMSAiT-PART$ 117330 ASA ANALYSIS S280.00 ENGINE OIL ANALYSIS 117331 111332 AT S T A I I I S39219934 i2a ggb.5; LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 117333 - AT s T s2T4.75 LONG-DISTANCE THLOi?lI9NB SRR`TICRA LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 117334 ADVANCED COMPUTER FRODUCTSI- S247.43 COMPUTER PARTS .-117335- ADVANCO__CONSTRLICTORS__-INC-- -63%-54 CONSTRUG710N RI-34-3,r Pl-35-2 117336 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS INC. $1279616.88 CONSTRUCTION P1-34-2 117337 AEROCHEM INC S250.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 117338 AIR COLD SUPPL - INC s17.44 A;R-CgNDITIANING REPAIRS 117339 ALAODIN HOUSE S39358.54 BUILDING SUPPLIES 117340 ALEY FOODS INC $100000 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT -111-141 RQBCO INC-LI-OR-AHER_LCAN_SFALS s2SR17.79 RNGINS ARTS 117342 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION S89059099 EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIRS 117343 SLAKE P ANDERSON $154.15 CELLULAR TELEPHONE EXPENSES __112344 A_-PLUSYSTEMS-_ __ _ ssa31i.'In NOTICES & ADS S 117345 ARATEX SERVICES INC s69162.57 UNIFORM RENTALS 117346 ARENS INDUSTRIES INC s29336.04 INSTRUMENT PARTS _ 11_734.7 _DENLAI _INS11R_ANCE_CQNSULl_ -_ 112.00 DENTAL- I S 117348 AUTOMATION SERVICE STS4.66 INSTRUMENT PARTS 117349 THE AVEBURY GROUP s59494.00 MECHANICAL PARTS _.-11135e AWARDSB�EROPHIFS :4R.11 PLAQUES 117351 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE S429147.78 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.7-13-88 117352 BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE $256.00 BACKFLOW TESTING _1113 v 6ANANA-HLUERRLNT_-____-. S1.726.41 SLUERRINTING-M 0.10-10-90 117354 BARCLAYS LAW PUBLISHERS S108.25 SUBSCRIPTION 117355 WARREN L BAUER $93.05 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT _117356 BARIER_MA.GN S_ l.CS_INC-_ s30.e36.04 LAIR SUPPLIES 117357 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $962.41 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 117358 BELL SECURITY s29643.26 SECURITY CONSULTANT _ILZ3a9 W_T_ BIL_LA.BQ.._1dE___-___.-__ S93.48 TRUCK PARTS 117360 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP S131440.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-17 117361 BRADLEY MUHL 8 ASSOC. $96.54 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT i151.10 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 117363 BRITHINEE ELECTRIC SIO867031 ELECTRIC REPAIRS 117364 ROSEMOUNT INC S213.90 INSTRUMENT PARTS _10365-_.-..___BROWN__.8_...LALDWELL_-.CONSUl.I1NG___ s33.915.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES .7-19 117366 BRYCO ARMS S115.59 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 117367 BUILDERIS EMPORIUM S112.61 HARDWARE/LUMBER -._11I3EB.- ____ _-___SdI_BOOKS.__--- - -_...- _ .---_..--_-- s143.75 PUBLICATION 117369 THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFF S770.00 SUBSCRIPTION 117370 BURKE ENGINEERING CO 1137965 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES _11I371 ____@I1SH.._AND__ASSoCIALES _INC---_ s1.830.DO SURVEY SERVICES M-n F-12-91 117372 GARY G STREED S19814.54 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 127373 BUTLER PAPER COMPANY $89197.62 OFFICE SUPPLIES m X 2 t7U D I N FUND NO 919Q - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/02/91 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 ---.----_-.--------------._--..------__-- _- _ _. __ ._-- ..-_COUNTY.._SANIIATLON 0ISTRICIS _0"R.ANGE C0.11NTY CLAIMS PAID 10/09/91 POSTING DATE 10/09/91 ------_VENDDR_____.---..__ ..-_.__-. ----Ann tjNT nrSrgi*rtON 117374 CJE ASSOCIATES s?27.30 SUBSCRIPTION -117.3.75-___.__--C_---tl.___I.____.-_-.__._ -_ -_ --- ---------------.-- 1219 14 ELECTRICPARTS 117376 SUMMIT SOLUTIONS• INC $39877965 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 117377 CS COMPANY $281.49 VALVE _1.173IR -C V C ------ S1 6.4f1 REF3JND-USER-fiE ZRBAYMENT 117379 1991 CWPCA SRTC $29'970.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION M.0.6-12-91 117380 CAL -GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. 319495.30 LAB SUPPLIES INSTRUMENT PARTS 117382 CARLETON ENGINEERS $39074*03 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.0.5-9-90 117383 JOHN CAROLLO -ENGINEERS S18991B9.13 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-34,11-17,P1-38 -111324 CAIHCARILBEGIN_ASSOCa__INC- s4-o{;�44 LANDSCAPE-ARCHZTECTURE 117385 CENTURY PAINT S2D1.46 PAINT SUPPLIES 117386 CENTURY SAFETY INST & SUPP 119614.16 SAFETY SUPPLIES --.4173BI -CERIIEIED_AP_ELIANCE _CQ_---- 1339.47 A DEP-AIRS 117388 CHERRY TEXTRON $19223,29 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 117389 AW CHESTERTON - LA $19013.06 OIL _117390 CH.EVff2R___USA-i N C_ _----- - S A R ,13 5.31 OIL- &-ZREASE 117391 THE COBB GROUP S69.00 SUBSCRIPTION 117392 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA S69648.33 COMPRESSOR REPAIR OFE CE MACHINES 117394 CONNELL GM PARTS / DIV $256.00 TRUCK PARTS 117395 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST S90188.94 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES CQNIINENIAL-AIR _ TB_0LS-INC s5.099.97 TQpT., __111396- 11739T CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO S19713.23 CHLORINE 117398 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS 5656.74 PRINTING _-117399_ .--_-_CQNLRACIDR!S._...BOOK--.STORE.--_ :22D-R1 PIMLICATInN 117400 CORE -INTERNATIONAL $571000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 117401 CORE-LARS $415000 LAB SERVICES -11 -402 SORE-RIlRION __.P.fl4QUCTS --_ It .216.5o SCRIMARR PARTS 117403 CORONADO SQUARE $120.42 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 117404 R E COULTER CRANE RENTAL S19044.OD EQUIPMENT RENTAL SS41.77 REFuNn USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 117406 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC S197.42 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 117407 CREATIVE SCREEN ARTS S19270.68 TRUCK PARTS __•--117408 CAES?LIftE--CQ._INC---_-_-_ i1.639.20 nryTrR StiPP1.TRS 117409 CULLIGAN WATER CONDITIONING $55.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 117410 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL $137925 UNDERGROUND TANK STORAGE - CLEAN-UP _.1L7.411-.--.- -DAMES-1-MOORS._-_. s7,g?3198 PRELIM. SITE ASSESSMENT - OIL PROPERTI$$ 117412 DAMES & MOORE S189553.67 STRUCTURAL/SEISMIC REVIEW H.O.10-10-90 117413 H. G. DANIELS COMPANY S192.01 OFFICE SUPPLIES 14 - -D4N3.ELS_-lIRE--SERVICE___-___--- $1.695.39 TTRRa 1IT415 DEPT OF FISH & GAME S315.00 PERMIT FEES 117416 OIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $19519.42 PRINTING _ _LL74.17 -DIf7ITAL__..EQUIPMENT_--CQR�_____ -__ -- $R.452,41 SERVICEAGREEMENT 117418 DISC MANUFACTURING S176.43 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 117419 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC S6033.06 PLANT MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PRDCESSING DATE 1D/02/91 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 _ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICLS_OF ORAALGE COUNTS _ CLAIMS PAID 10/09/91 POSTING DATE 10/D9/91 -ARRANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 117420 DUNN EDWARDS CORP S29550.76 PAINT SUPPLIES -117421 n±lA _S __S_ALES 179.96 EI,ECT�[' PAR'1'R 117422 EMA SERVICES INC S19853.04 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-23-2, P2-44 117423 117424 EAGLE ENTERPRISES EASTMAN INC S29034.32 i1.41'&.17 PLUMBING SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 117425 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC $112.70 LAB SAMPLES 117426 MRI INSTRUMENTS 6 CONTROL S285.34 INSTRUMENT -11I427_ JOHN El FALRENSI-EIN_PE__- -- is,2n0.nn CONSTRUCTION SERVICES .7-7-4 117428 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP S307.25 AIR FREIGHT 117429 FERRELLGAS $25.52 PROPANE -11743n FTSCHER It _PORTER -SD. s2.415.24 CHLORINATION PARTS 117431 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO S19858.65 LAB SUPPLIES 117432 FLUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $411.97 PUMP PARTS __1.171,13 SITY DE_FOUNIA.IN_.YALLE.Y s4.b5s-.51 WATER USE 117434 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $760.66 PAINT SUPPLIES 117435 FOXBORO CO / MAG SYSTEMS s19S.66 INSTRUMENT PARTS __1.1.29 -�lDRQAN_�DIltffiDLSs__1NL.-- s474 62 INSTRUMENT PARTS m 117437 FRANKLIN COMPUTER CORP. S87.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES X 2 117438 FREEHAND DESIGN SYS S279.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES t + __117434---__GANAHL____LUMBER__ OQ--__ i117.90 HARDWARE bd 117440 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $49691.17 CHEMICALS 117441 GEM-O-LITE PLASTICS CORP S749.22 BUILDING MATERIALS -_1LZ-"2_ __-GENERAL-ROSIER _CORD_._-.____-- s55R.39 SUSSCRTPTION n 117443 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO s907.60 TELEPHONE SERVICES I 117444 GEORGE LEECH 8 ASSOCIATES $19026.44 ELECTRIC PARTS W _11I945_-___-____G1E8LIC.H-HITC.HELL.__I_NC_ _._____- s251,U1.27 MECHANICAL PARTS 117446 GORDONOS INC $19015011 OFFICE SUPPLIES 117447 GREGGIS FOOD PRODUCTS S29019.68 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 111448 HARR INGTON_INOUSIR.IAL__PlASI1 S221.04 PT.ASTTCS 117449 HASCO OIL CO INC $139.48 OIL 117450 HATCH 8 KIRK INC s29450.02 MECHANICAL PARTS $3.0 73.72 FILTERS 117452 J.T. HORVATH R ASSOC. S29520.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, J-7-4 117453 HOUSE OF BATTERIES i129.31 BATTERIES -_117454 RS_ HUGHES-CDINC ___ S4.750.42 PAINT SUPPLIRS 117455 HUNTER CORPORATION $8219262.00 CONSTRUCTION J-19-1 117456 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STA S268.94 OFFICE SUPPLIES -1LT4_57 INE.L04--5.1GNAL_Q11_C._ s100.0n REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 117458 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHWINN C $92.45 BICYCLE PARTS 117459 THE IDEA BANK S823.92 PUBLICATION EQ-__-__IMF€RIaL._WEST_._ CHEMICAL_-____ i62.266.54 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-14-90 117462 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $129349.02 STEEL 117462 1NGRAM PAPER s3.804.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES _117463 CLEAN AIR. REPORT ____„T_.__ s425.00 SUBSCRIPTION 117464 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT s4.00 WATER USE 117465 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP s346.22 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES m X 9 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/02/91 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 - ----- _- -. -------..----•-- --_-. COUNTY. -SANITATION D1SL31LL5-DE_DRANGE COUN_IV CLAIMS PAID 10/09/91 POSTING DATE 10/09/91 -WARRANT N0. __-----------YENOIlB--.--- - AMniimT DESCRIPTtnN 117466 JAY S CATERING S905.99 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSES GEORGE 1100.nn REFUND -USER -IEEE -OVERPAYMENT 117468 KALLEENvS COMPUTER PRODUCTS S8g2.97 OFFICE SUPPLIES 117469 KAMAN BEARINGS 8 SUPPLY $383.55 FITTINGS __JI_D70 KANEB-SQMEAMY_ --- 5453.19 TOOLS 117471 KEEN-KUT ABRASIVE CO S404.D6 TOOLS 117472 KELLY SEPVICES %420.BO TEMPORARY SERVICES K.ENY_ON-SP-ARCRAF_L.____----•------___-- S1ng�01 REFUND -USER -SEE -OVERPAYMENT 117474 KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORP S40095043 WORK BENCH 117475 KING BEARING INC $39042.48 FITTINGS --117476 LAB--SAEETY__SUPPLY--CO.-_-_-_- S44•22 LAn-SUORT-IE3 117477 LASER SUPPLIES 8 SERVICE S775.4B PRINTING SUPPLIES 117478 LEACH CORP S629.07 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 1175-72--__--.LEE___.8__.R0__ CONS ULTLNG ENGB._-_ .____._- -S15s010.D0 ENGINEERING -SERVICES PI-11 117489 LE , ROY CRANDALL 8 ASSOC $19544.05 GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES 117481 KP LINDSTROM INC $119632.98 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING M.0.10-10-90 11 74AP L o.TUS_D EY ELOLCQRR_-. 19 4- n n PUBLICATIONS 117483 MBL INDUSTRIES S272.50 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 117484 MPS S32.07 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 8AGNETEK___.NAT.IDNA L_ELECTRIC _-__ iT.64n.03 ELECTRIC REPAIRS 117486 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $84.49 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 117487 MATT - CHLOR INC $173066 CHLORINATION PARTS 1174gg _.-MCCURlZ1LI:IRCUITS----__-_-- s2,see.ee REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 117489 MCKENNA ENGR .8 EOUIP $59950.36 PUMP SUPPLIES 117490 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO S396.06 TOOLS -112441_--_ .-_._-THE-NFJ31.TERRANEAN-__INN____-___-.-_ %%43.0R REETIND ITSER ERR AVRRPAVMRNT 117492 MICEL. INC S99.76 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 117493 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO $59157.34 SAFETY SUPPLIES -.11Z424--_�-17IN LIE __.CQBe__-_.____ _____._ __-- 120338-nn AIR CONDITIONING REPAIRS 117495 MONITOR PUBLISHING CO $473.00 PUBLICATION 1174% JAMES M MONTGOMERY $209622.25 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.12-12-90 _117497__._____.___.___-MOTION_ INDUSTRIES INC... __. _...._.-____._.-___-__.___ 1115.71 NARnWARR 117498 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES INC $29250.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 117499 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $250.00 MEMBERSHIP FEES -1175_00 -__-_..NATI.4NAL-SAEE.TY-COUNCIL-___-__- S323.0e p1EMflRR3NTP Eggs 117501 NETWARE ADVISOR $105000 SUBSCRIPTION 117502 GUST K NEWBERG CONST CO $8469105.53 CONSTRUCTION P1-33 ELEC-TRONICS - _.____ - __ __ 36.38 TNSTRUMRNT PARTS 117504 NORLYN BUILDERS $8050.00 REFUND CONNECTION FEES 117505 NORTHGATE COMPUTER SYSTEMS S282.00 COMPUTER HARDWARE N---._.___- .-- •----------- s 3 9 5. 2 5 T.AR__SUPPLIES 117507 O'ORIEN ENERGY SYSTEMS S259B12.98 INTERIM POWER GEN. SYST. M.0.3-8-89 117508 OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORP S495.45 OIL 145, A7.73 rHT.ORTHR M-O-2-14-90 _ 117510 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO S819.74 CHEMICALS 117511 ORANGE VALVE 6 FITTING CO. $29029.52 FITTINGS m X S to -I D 1 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL VAMNT N0a VEJIDQL.._ -__ PROCESSING DATE 10/02/91 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITAIION_ DISTRICTS- 0E-QE�N.fiE�OUNT�_-_-._- CLAIMS PAID 10/09/91 POSTING DATE 10/09/91 117512 OXYGEN SERVICE $19007.49 SPECIALTY GASES -.._.-CDUNIY. _SANITATION _ DISTRICT_______ _-_-_. Y2.34Z.27 -REIMBURSE-WORKERS-COMP -INSURANCE-� 117514 PACIFIC PARTS s39558.3C INSTRUMENT PARTS 117515 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO $19493.05 SAFETY SUPPLIES 117516 PACIFIC BELL-_._-_-_- __ _ SAIA-34 TELEPHONE --SERVICES 117517 PACTEL CELLULAR $54.35 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 117518 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS 579418.72 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS _11751 _PAGE ._ ONE PHOTgGRAPHIC -SERVICES 117520 PAK WEST 529005.12 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 117521 PARAGON CABLE. 528.36 CABLE SERVICES -112522- _PARTS__UNLIMITED__-.__._._..._....____.____ 117523 PEERLESS WIPING MATERIALS C 117524 PHOTO B SOUND CO _11.2525---.P-IMA.-GRO__SYSTEMS__INC._-.--- 117526 PIT NEY BOWES 117527 PLASTIC INDUSTRIES _117528_-_-- _.__PLELON _CORP.--42_- _.-------____-- 117529 POLY ENTERPRISES INC 117530 POLYMETRICS• INC. _117531----__.POLY.PURE._ INC_---- ------•---.---. 117532 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO 117533 PREMIUM CONNECTING POINT 117535 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE 117536 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. s A s n. 4 2 TRUCIL-PARTS $29531.25 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 1160.94 COMPUTER REPAIR -sR"*u "_&A -RESIDUALS_REMOVAL Mn-5-A-91 5310.57 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 5315.36 PLASTICS _ _ __Z2.077.75 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT $313.55 LAB SUPPLIES 5474.93 RENTAL EQUIPMENT _---------III$TO3..23 CATIONIC POLYMER M 0 3-11-87 S156904 ELECTRIC PARTS $95.00 _.-_- $173.64 OFFICE EQUIPMENT PUBLICATIONS 5182.00 ICE $49248.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O.7-17-91 _.112531-_-,-_..__._PUTZMEISTER.. INC- ._._ ._ ------ --..____ :gs.ng RUMP PARTS 11T538 0 SALES - EARTHQUAKE SAFETY 912892014 SAFETY SUPPLIES 117539 RPM COMPUTER RIBBON CORP $29523.20 PRINTING SUPPLIES _--.13.59n-_ .v_RATTRAY`ANO.-_ASSOCLATES-_.ING.-.._-- s2-*46Q-ne PHOTOGRAMMETERIC MAvPrNc SERVICES 117541 RECYC INC 5509756.71 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-13-91 117542 RED WING SHOES 5651.42 SAFETY SHOES _._111543 .__-AEDL.__EXPBESS.___....-___ __.--_ =9R-35 COURIER SERVICE 117544 REDIE LAUNDRY 9 CLEANERS $513.92 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 117545 RA REED ELECTRIC $843009 ELECTRIC METER _-_11754fi__-_ TI.DC-BEGIONAL_IBAININCLCENTFR S5i197.3i TRAINING, REMSTRAT ON M_0_6-12-91 117547 REMEDY TEMP 539106099 TEMPORARY SERVICES 117548 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO 531751.88 INSTRUMENT PARTS __112542--------------J_-R-ROBERTS _. __._ _._.___-.-----_-� _IA9.2�3L4-II CONSTRUCTION_5-17 117550 J R ROBERTS CORP $3259801.00 CONSTRUCTION J-23-1 117551 ROSEMOUNT/UNILOC S19693997 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES __11.Z552-----•_-__.3YAN-HERCO---.--.--_-----__�. .---_.--_-- 546A.9n UAT.VE 117553 JOSEPH T RYERSON S. SON IN 529243.26 METAL 117554 SKC WEST 519310.64 LAB SUPPLIES 117.555-_._____SAFETY-KLEEN _. CORP ...... . _._ _.____- s26447.50 PARTS CLEANER 117556 DOUG SARVIS $19000000 CPR & FIRST AID TRAINING 117557 SEA -BIRD ELECTRONICS INC 529107.00 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/02/91 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 ..._.-._.-____ _..._,_._ ._._.__._ COUNTY- -SANITAIIQN-_alS.T&1LTS_DE_.ORANGF COUNTY -- CLAIMS PAID 10/09/91 POSTING DATE 10/09/91 ULRRANT NO_-_---- -- ---VENDOR ...... --------_--_-- a-4miNT DESCRIPTION 127558 SEA COAST DESIGNS SIS116.59 OFFICE EQUIPMENT --_.SEAGATE__TECHNOLOGIES ..__..._-_._-_-__._______.- __ It97.02- INSTRUMENT 117560 CITY OF SEAL BEACH 5202.50 WATER USE 117561 SEARS ROEBUCK 9 CO $19422.90 SAMPLE STORAGE REFRIGERATORS _-117562 -SEJIEB-EQUIi'-..CO.-OE-_AtlEEICA_ IBAL.65 ROOT rUTTTTING 117563 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $29130.78 TOOLS 117564 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO $45.91 LAB SUPPLIES -11Z565--_.--__SKYt'AR1L-_HALK-IN__MEDICA' RE=EMPLOYMPUT-PHYSICAL EXAMS 117566 SMITH -EMERY CO $19751.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-17-91 117567 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO ST9308.30 POWER __..11T568 _-S011IHERN__LOUNTIES-__DIL.___CG-.-- 11II+9699423 DIESBLEx EL 117569 SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPOR C 5505.00 LEASE AGREEMENT 117570 SOUVENIR PHOTO S33.12 FILM PROCESSING _--1L757L-_ ._WESIALL0Y--INC _ ..._-----.-----•------------- iIsA35.39 TOOLS 117572 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS INC 5514.96 INSTRUMENT PART 117573 SPECTRO OIL WEST $68-96 OIL -117574-.-_-_--..STATEWIIIE_INSTALLERS- STRZ-.10 LAB SUPPLIES 117575 STERLING ART 531.59 GRAPHIC SUPPLIES 117576 STONE CONTAINER $49137.37 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT -mil LSZT---_-_SUMHII- STEEL.-_.-_ -----------.--- -19Z�c9 STEEL 117578 SUN -BELT LANDSCAPE 6 MAINT. 539847.00 CONTRACT LANDSCAPING M.O.8-9-89 117579 SUNSET FORD 5153.77 TRUCK PARTS -117 ac -SUPELC.fl-INC___._.__ -_ _--. tbGT.49 T-AB SUPPLIES 117581 SUPER CHEM CORP 519621.42 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 117582 THE TABERY CORP S397005 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT _.._117593- TAYLOR-DUNN_..._MEG__,;OtlPANIL�.--._-_- 11,12il- 2 TRUCK PARTS 117584 THEODORE BOBBINS FORD $29380.80 VAN RENTALS 117585 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 519210.32 MECHANICAL PARTS _-1175$f; TflLEDO_S,CALE.CORP_.___._.-__. _ 120519016 SCALE REPAIRS 117587 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE INC $69140.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DIST 3 117586 TRAVEL TRAVEL SIO140.20 TRAVEL SERVICES M.0.6-12-91 iB0S-07 WINDDW r1.RANTNG 217590 TROPI% INC 5445.00 LAB SUPPLIES 117591 TRUCK 8 AUTO SUPPLY INC S971090 TRUCK PARTS .. Ul."2---_--- VI.NCENT ..TRUONG_ &.. LOW OFF.ICES___- __ 1i4 7, aT LIABILITY CLAIM SETTLEMENT 117593 JG TUCKER 6 SON INC 5943.53 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 117594 UNITED NOTTINGHAM S114.58 RENTAL EQUIPMENT _.-UNITED PARCEL-- SERVICE..._ -_..__..._,_____ i21:Lft.2n PARCRL. SRRVTCRS 117596 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 5383.48 PARCEL SERVICES 117597 UNITED STATES ELEVATOR CORP 539418.64 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE -.SUPERINTENDENT Of. DOCUMENTS-_ .-___ 11i4n, n0 SUBSCRTPTTnM 117599 V.F. ENTERPRISES S59872.57 TRAILER 117600 VWR SCIENTIFIC $39551.84 LAB SUPPLIES 15.g64-.A7 21,1WBIN[: SUPPLIES 117602 VAN WATER 9 ROGERS $19508650 CHEMICALS 117603 WALL STREET JOURNAL 5149.08 PUBLICATION i FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/02/91 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATIom ntSTRTCT% nF nRANGF MINTY CLAIMS PAID 10/09/91 POSTING DATE 10/09/91 117604 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY S489199062 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.10-10-90 —11760ti REST RUX—I TERNATIO.NAL_ -_ :55.2l TRUCK PARTS 117606 WHEELER RIDGE-MARICOPA WTR STO S119100.00 PIPE 117607 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES $19991.57 ENGINEERING SERVICES -11Z608 krRnx -CORP -- _- s9•417-51 COPIER LEASES 117609 GEORGE YARDLEY CO $100.12 FREIGHT 117610 YARDLEY INSTRUMENTS S261.61 INSTRUMENTS __112611—_ —ZIE9AR-1-H-&-_ALPER/CLSa-A_LPER__ 1355_*L045. Afi CONSTRUCTION-22-42-1 117612 ZIEBARTH AND ALPER $2389699.00 ----------------- CONSTRUCTION P1-34-1 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 10/09/91 --SUMMARiF----- - --- - #2 OPER FUND ---#2-6AP -FAG-FUND -- - - -- #3 OPER FUND #3 CAP FAC FUND #5-APER-FUND—------- #5 CAP FAC FUND #6 OPER FUND ---#6-CAP-€AC--FUND------------ #7 OPER FUND #7 CAP FAC FUND r--414-APER-FUND --- #11 CAP FAC FUND #14 CAP FAC FUND -46&7 - OPER -FUND- -- - ------ #7&14 OPER FUND JT OPER FUND SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS JT WORKING CAPITAL t69044t612.01 $1,999.86 --------- $7, 063.67 ;38,016.21 $4,806.72 ------ - *1-,06.5_93 $200.71 $420.18 --- - ----- - - $ 1000 00 $6,741.99 $2,063.00 ---- $2r638-47 - $22,584.06 $6,531.51 --------------- -$ 8 r R 7 7 44 ;100.54 $490,542.51 $3,407.14 $215,660.61 --------------- $6,044,612.01 FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/17/91 PAGE I REPORT NUMBER AP43 CCUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS -OF.. -ORANGE COUNTY-_._,_ __.._._._•_ __ .__-__-___-___. CLAIMS PAID 10/23/91 POSTING DATE 10/23/91 9ARRANT NO* _ __VENDOR --AMOUNT-_-_ _- _. w_- -DESCRIPTION 117629 ABM BUSINESS MACHINES S26.94 OFFICE MACHINE REPAIR 117630__ ACIA COAVENTICN 091 _ .. _1220.00 _.-.__. _... CONFERENCE REGISTRBTION_- 117631 ACCESS CATA $448000 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 117632 ACCU-LABS RESEARCH INC $50.00 LAB SERVICES ACME.. -HEATER CO - _..-i171.63 ___ HEATER PARTS 117634 AERCC CCPPRESSORS INC S310.71 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1176.3E AIR FRCCICTS. 8 CHEPICAL IN $329348.00 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN SYST M.0.8-9-89 117636 _ AIRWAY SCALE CCPPAhY $247.50 SCALE REPAIRS 117637 AMERICAN FLEET FARTS $106.67 TRUCK PARTS 117638 AMERICAN LOCK 8 SUPPLY INC $295.80 HARDWARE _41.7639 ______-_._ .RCBCO _(AC. 8/GR AMERICAN SEALS _. 35A32@:82__.-. _ ._ _ ______PUMP -.PARTS_ __•___ _ 117640 ANAHEIM SEWER CCNSTRUCTICN• S39300.00 EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIRS DIST 7 117641 ARATEX SERVICES INC S356.60 UNIFORM RENTALS 117642,_- AR120NA INSTRUMENT S1*316.25 _ _INSTRUMENT PARTS 117643 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING $39068.00 SOIL TESTING 117644 ASSOC. ADPINIS. 8 CONSULTANTS $140.00 MEDICAL CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 117645._ _,.__.. A_.IINT OF CLASS -_ .__$147.46_ _ _ ..___.__.. WINDOW_ TINTING_.__ 117646 AWARCSBTRCFHIES S503.69 PLAQUES 117647 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE S539722.93 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.7-13-88 117648... .__ _ _._... BACKFLOW ._PREVENTION DEVICE _ _.s32.40 ...... -. .__ __._. BACKFLOW TESTING_ i17649 BANK OF AMERICA-CASC $40.50 C.O.P. ADMINISTRATION FEES 117650 BANK OF AFERICA $349059 MEETING EXPENSES M.0.6-12-91 -_•_BARCLAYS_._ LAW PUBLISHERS _._ _.5110.39 SUBSCRIPTION .117651_ 117652 PW BAROTTI AND ASSOC S19560.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES P1-3 - 117653 BARR COMMERCIAL DOOR S3 054.00 DOOR INSTALLATION 11.7654-. _.__-____. P OATEM'Ar_._.. DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 117655 BAXTER CIAGNOSTICS INC, $109655.26 LAB SUPPLIES 117656 DCN C BEA771E $588000 ENGINEERING SERVICES IlELL SE.CUR IIY -__SECURITY SERVICES _ 117658 BIELSKI MASONRY 8 CLEANING $39495.00 CLEANING SERVICES 117659 BLUE M ELECTRIC CO $676044 OFFICE SUPPLIES -_B01$E.-CASCADE OFC QROQUCTS_ _....-.__._.. _S16h.:4@..__...._..._. _.-__.-._.__.._OFFICE_SUPPLIES 117661 BOLSA RAEIATCR SERVICE S512.11 RADIATOR REPAIRS 117662 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP S149093.24 ENGINEERING SERVICES 1-16, 5-3809 ' 1 BRENNER_-FIEDLER & ASSOC IN. _-----._$2o127.90 - .-LAB SUPPLIES 117664 BRINDERSON CORP S2899931.26 CONSTRUCTION J-19-2 117665 BRCWN 8 CALCWELL CONSULTING S209756958 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19 117666 STEVE BLBALC CCNSTRUCTION CO $244947@.32 CONSTRUCTION 2-26-3, 2-28, 2-29 117667 BUILCERIS EKPCRIUM S673.42 HARDWARE 117668 BURKE ENGINEERING CO S128.83 ELECTRIC PARTS _I L7fib.2 -._ ._-_......BU$HAyD. A.$SQC I ATES. I NC . ___ _ .....------- 112.L054.0-o-- ...._-_-__-.-SURVEYING -SERVICES M.0.6-12-91 117670 GARY G STREED S49636.91 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 117671 BUTLER PAPER CCMPANY $225.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES 117672 C M I _ _ $373146.--_ ._ _INSTRUMENT -_ 117673 SUMMIT SCLLTICNS• INC $130.00 PRINTER TRAY 117674 CS COMPANY $29788950 VALVE FUND NC 9190 J1 LIST 16CRKING CAFTTAL PROCESSING DATE 10/17/91 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/23/91 POSTING DATE 10/23/91 WARRANT NC. VENDOR 117675 CAL -GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. 117676 CAL-FAC CHEMICAL CO INC 117677 - CALTROL INC 117678 JCHN R CALAPRICE PHD 117679 CALIFCRNIA AL70PATIC C97E 11768G CARLETOh ENGINEERS 117681 CAROLLO-BOYLE ENGINEERS 117682 MDT/CASTLE 111683 CATHCAR7/EECTh ASSOCs INC 117684 CENT.LRY SAFETY INS1 8 SUFP 117685 __ CHEVRON LSA INC 11T686__ CLOSSCN 9 CLOSSON 117687 THE COBS GROUP 117688 COLICH ANC SCNS 117689 COPPRESSCR CCMPCNENIS CF CA 117690 CCMPUTER BAY 117691 CONARD•S PHOTOGRAPHY 117692 CONNELL GM PARTS / DIV 117693 CONSOLIEAIEC ELECTkICAL DIST 117694 CONSCLICAIED REFROGRAPHICS 117695 CCNTAINERIZED CHEMICAL CISPO 117696 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC 117697 _CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO 117698 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS 117699 CCNTRACTOPIS BOCK STORE 1177C0.."__ CON7RCL EATA CCRPORA7I0h 117701 CCNVERSE CCNSULTANTS 0 C 117702 COOPER IhOUSTRIES INC _117703 _ COSTA _MESA AUTO SUPPLY 137764_____ COUNTY YhCLESALE ELECTRIC 117705 CHARLES F CRCWLEY CO 117706 EPPLCYMEhl CEVELCPMEKT CEFT 117767 STATE CF CALIFCPNIA 117708 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 117709 STATE BOARD OF EQUILIZATION 117716 STATE RATER RESOURCES CONTR 117711 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 117712 DE ANZA CCRFCRA710h 117713 CALIF. CEFT CF FISH 8 GAME 117714 DEZURIK AND/OR. CS CO 117715__._._ _ DIATEC. PCLYMERS 117716 RALPN DICKPAN 117717 OTFILIPFC ASECCIATES 117718 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP 117719 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC 117720 DUNN EDWARDS CORP 2 AMOUNT.. DESCRIPTION_ $666.97 LAB REPAIRS $387.58 CHEMICALS s1.12o.92 MECHANICAL PARTS_.---- --- $12r850.26 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.11-14-90 S861.58 SERVICE AGREEMENT $930.18 ENGINEERING SERVICES"M:0:5"=9=90- S6.645.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES - SLUDGE MGMT $496.67 LAB SUPPLIES $29237.50 LANDSCAPING SERVICES" - $154016 SAFETY SUPPLIES $29850.61 OIL & GREASE $280.00 LANDSCAPE CONSULTING -- S108.00 TECHNICAL SUBSCRIPTION $1009000000 CONSTRUCTION I-9 S819.63 MECHANICAL PARTS"" -- ---" $19772.49 COMPUTER SOFTWARE $237.05 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES $473.84 TRUCK PARTS" -- - 149366.23 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES S112.47 OFFICE SUPPLIES 550.00 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL- ---" S1r393.42 TOOLS S1t713.23,___. CHLORINE S51.42 ENGINEERING SUPPLIES - $48.43 TECHNICAL PUBLICATION S29977.53 INSTRUMENT PART S920.86 SOIL -TESTING M.0:7=17=91"- $58.44 INSTRUMENT PARTS TRUCK PARTS -ELECTRIC ELECTRIC SUPPLIES-- $490.21 PUMP PARTS S31134.00_ STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE $198.52 DIESEL USE TAX'-"�-�- $162.00 SUBSCRIPTION E422:,22_._ UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK TAXES 578.81 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK-CLEAN=UP" $19095084 TIRES S150.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 5315.00 _._.-._ APPLICATION FEES ' $29160914 VALVES V 9 342.66 CHEMICALS _ $60.00 DEDUCTION REIHBURSEMENT- S384.66 PRINTING S59504.05_ OFFICE EQUIPMENT $39304.54 PLANT MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS S19233.27 PAINT SUPPLIES m X 2 to -I C7d I W FUND NC 9199 - JT DIST WCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/17/91 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF,ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/23/91 POSTING DATE 10/23/91 WARRANT NC. VENCOR 117721 EIM CO/NES SUPPLY 117722 EIMCO PRCCESS EQUIP CO 117723 ENSFCO-CRL 117724 EAGLE DISTRIBUTING 127725 EASTNAN INC 117726 EBERH'ARD EQUIPMENT 117727 ELECTRO-TEST INC 117728 ELECTRONIC BALANCING CO 117129 EMERSON INDUSTRIAL CCNTROLS 117730 ENCHANTER INC 111731-__...•,_ _•_._ FKM. COFIER FROCLCTS 117732 MARSHALL FAIRRES 117733 JOHN B FALKENSTEIN PE 117734__ FEOERAL EXPRESS CORP 127735 FERRFLLGAS 117736 FILTER SLPPLY CC 117737 _ _ FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURA 111738 FISCPER B PCRTER CO 117739 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO 117740, FLO-SYSTEMS 117741, FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA 117742 FOX ENTERPRISES 117743 _ .. _. _.. - THE FOXBCRO CO 117744 ARGENE FREY 117745 CITY OF FULLERTON 117746_„ GENERAL _ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. 111747._ GENERAL OCEANICS9 INC. 117748 GENERAL PCLER CORP _11j749_ GIERLICH-PITCF'ELL INC - 117750 YW GRAINGER INC 117751 THOMAS GRAY 6 ASSOC INC 117752 _ DON GREEK 8 ASSOCIATES 117753 CRCTF EOLIFPENT CORP 1177554 HHK ASSCCIATES „117755 HARRCUB ENGINEERING 117756 FRED A HARPER 117757 HATCH S KIRK INC 117758 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS 117759 PL PAWN CC INC 117760 HERMAN-FHINNEY-KCCMUR 117761__._ _ _.._. HOLRBIGER CVS. CALIF INC 117762 J.T. HORVATH R ASSOC. 117763 HOUSE OF BATTERIES 1177C4 GCROCN 4 HOYT 117765 PS HLGHEE CC INC 117766 CITY OF hUNTINGTON 6EACI, _.AMOUNT _ DESCRIPTION $59345.43 S79750.00- . $19800.00 S77.84 - 54�034.12 $136.78 $530.00 i165.04 . $479188.00 $309380.00 $368,63. $173.08 $39200.00 $91900 Sl2.76 $606.52 $19606.04 $310.17 S53.75 $19825.00 - - -- $3 a 791 9_76 - - - S71.16 $142.60 _$94987.- . _. $139271.54 $25.78 S187.22 $450oOG $101*63 $300000 $109864.25_- $19460.00 S49598.99 $39780,00 i646.12 $884.63 --.-._--- 3235999 S29380.00 $1 0106'.01 _. $720900 S307.57 $22.41 PAGE 3 PLUMBING SUPPLIES MECHANICAL PARTS LAB SUPPLIES -- TOOLS OFFICE SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS -`- ELECTRIC PARTS IMPELLER VARIABLE FREQUENCY -DRIVE M:-O: 6=-12-9i-- OCEAN MONITORING M.0.7-17-91 FILM DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION - CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-4 AIR FREIGHT PROPANE - ------ PUMP PARTS PAC. ENERGY CONDEMNATION M.0.10-9-91 CHLORINATION'PARTS- - ` - LAB SUPPLIES PUMPS FILM -.- SAFETY CONSULTANT INSTRUMENT PARTS - DEFERRED -COMP -DISTRIBUTER WATER USEAGE ELECTRIC PARTS WATER SAMPLER—— _- --- --- FREIGHT MECHANICAL SUPPLIES METER ----- --- -- - --- LAB TESTING SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-12-91 FREIGHT _ PRINTING PUMP PARTS DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION_ -"-- TRUCK PARTS CONTAINER RENTALS FILTER - -- ---- PUMP PARTS MECHANICAL PARTS CONSTRUCTION--SERVICES-J- -3-7-4 BATTERIES ENGINEERING SERVICES M.0.9-12-90 HARDWARE WATER USE m X S to t70 I FUND NC 91S9 - JT LIST WORKING CAPITAL WARRANT N0. VENDOR PROCESSING DATE 10/17/91 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CCUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE.000NTY__ CLAIMS FAID 10/23/91 POSTING DATE 10/23/91 117767 HUNTINGTCN HONDA 117768 HYDRCCON CCMPANY 117769 HYDROTEX INC 217770 I.G. INDUSTRIAL CORP. 317771 _ IDEA MAN, INC 117772 IMPERIAL PEST CHEMICAL 117773 INDUSTRIAL TFREADED PRCDUCTS 117774 INGRAM PAPER 117775 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. 117776 INTERNATICNAL SENSOR TECh 117777. IRVINE RARCH, WATER DISTRICT 117778 _ JLA CRECIT CCRP 117779 GREAT LESIERN SANITARY SUFP 117780 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO _ 117761 JETTER SERVICE USA 117782 KALLEENOS COMPUTER PRODUCTS 117783 KANER COtfANY 117784 KAR PRCOLCTS 117785 KARS$ ADVANCED MATERIALS INC 117786 KELLY -SERVICES 117787 KE6ALNEE SCIENTIFIC CORP 117768 KING BEARING INC KOHL!SHALLMARK _-CENTER - .1177P9_ _ 117790 YARTIr, KCRDICK SR 117791 LIFECOM-SAFETY SERVICE SUPPL 117792.-- LIMITOROUE CORP 117193_ LTNCOLN NATIONAL 117794 KP LINCSTRCM INC ---POT QICLCCIC CCMPANY- - _- 117796 KPS 117797 MACOMCO 117798_ PRODUCTS INC 117799 -__-_MAINTENANCE MARVAC ELECTRONICS 117800 MATT - CHLOR INC 117801 MCKENNA ENGR S EQLIP 117802 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CC 117803 MICRO MOTION 117804 MILLTRONICS 117805 PINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO 117806 MISSICN AERASIVE SUFFLILS 117807 MITCHELL, INSTRUMENT CO 117808 MITCHELL FACIFIC CONSTRUCTORS 117809 MLADEN BLNTICH CONSTRUCTION 117810 JAMES M PONTGOMERY 117811 MCNTCCMERI LABORATORIES 117812 MCRGAN CFANE CC INC AMOUNT . - DESCRIPTION— __ f79434.54 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES $608.99 METER $89203.98 OIL _ f887.57 CHEMICALS $19246.73 PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS S.399594.32 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11=14-90-- f324.74 HARDWARE $29082.17 OFFICE SUPPLIES -7e5 TRUCK PARTS SOS909 INSTRUMENT PARTS $44.91- WATER USE _-_- $145.32, -MICROFICHE READER -LEASE f242.94 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES $859.85 INSTRUMENT PARTS f225.00 FLOORING REPAIRS--_.--_.-_.------ $633.51 OFFICE SUPPLIES S852.04 BUILDING MATERIALS $123.90 -....- - ...... - - - -- ---- FITTINGS---- --_ - f59555.00 LAB REPAIRS TEMPORARY SERVICES _.... _.S2t247.33 f1T4.36 - LAB' SUPPLIES-_. - -- $19379.53 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES S672.36 OFFICE SUPPLIES -f29458.00 - CONSTRUCTION SERVICSS--T-- 9 f119.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS INSTRUMENT PARTS _-_$2_1,781.92_-. f104,086.88 - DEFERRED COMP TRANSFER------- - $69082.27 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O. 10-10-90 AGREEMENT --234._Q©� - S125.81 -_ __--_-_--__SERVICE PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES f372.45 SERVICE AGREEMENT 47t784.93 MECHANICAL PARTS S19.36 _ INSTRUMENT PARTS-- $19128.44 CHLORINATION PARTS f199524.30 PUMP PARTS f226.05 HARDWARE - - - --- f519.93 INSTRUMENT PARTS f29088.26 INSTRUMENT PARTS f2453.94 ; SAFETY SUPPLIES "-- -- - f112.e7 GLASS f 7 4 . 0 0_ METER S401�5T6.40 _ - CONSTRUCTION'7-11=2- f2249928.OG CONSTRUCTION 14-1-2 S10r723.56 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.12-12-90 $309183.50 LAB SERVICES M.O.-3=8-91- --.7- f181.53 TRUCK PARTS FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/17/91 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 CCUNTY SANITATICN DISTRICTS OF 006NGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/23/91 POSTING DATE 10/23/91 WARRANT N0. 117813 117814 _- 117816 117816 117817 i0618 _ 117829 117820 117A21 117622 11 7823 _.. 117824 117825 1178$6 117827 11782A 117829_ ._ 117830 117831 1178!2 117833 - 117834 117835 117836 117837 117838 117839 117840 117841 117642__ 117843 11.7844_- 117845 117846 11764.7 . 117848 117849 117850 117851 117852 117053.. 117954" 117855 117856 117857 117858 VENDOR MCTTCN I�CUSTPIES INC MC70RCLA CELLLLAR SERVICES NATL ASSCC PHCTOGRAPhIC MFPS NESLAB INSTRUMENTS NEWARK ELECTRONICS NORTHWESTERN CARBON OI CCPPCRA71ON ox SYS7EP: CC CLYMFIC TERMINAL CCMPANY ORANGE COAST NEUROMEDICAL ORANGE CCUNTY EQUIPMENT CO. ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CC* OXYGEN SERVICE CCUNTY CF ORANGE CCUNTY OF ORANGE ORANGE CCUNTY MARSHALL COUNTY SANITATIGN DISTRICT PSI PACIFIC AEPCGRAPHICS PACIFIC FARTS PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO PACIFIC DATER CONDITIONING C PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS PAGENET PALMIER]♦ TYLER• WIENER• PARTS LNLIMITED PEAT MARWICK MAIN S'CC ROY PENDERGRAFT PIMA GRO SYSTEMS INC PLAINS TPUEVALUE HARDWARE POLYFLRE INC PCWER SYSTEMS HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS Cn. ...RPM ELECTRIC MCTORS RAINBCW EISPCSAL CC RECYC INC FBCC CORP 8 REDLINE ENT REMEDY TEMP REMOTE METER RESETTING SYST THE RLFUBLIC SLPPLY CC RCCCCPS TRUCK WPECKING ALPEPT G RCTHEY LTD PEGGY RLoF RYAN-HERCC SAFETY-KLEEN CORP AMOUNT $498.35 $175.74 $250900 $1.738.18 $12,11 S2.252.96 $562925 E26.396.46 $3.404.12 $225.UO _ $90.42 $1.140.25 S804.74 $2.641.65 $4.986.00 S1.525.01 T4.040.68 S118.53 $806.66 S909.92 $636.94 $68.40 $169093 $71.84 $6.105.80 $11512.70 S10.000.00 $450.00 $A2.92 $15.830.85 _ s318.50 $140.00 S5.192.00 S1.209.19 S1.298.85 $40.559.13 $910000 S2.936.18 S5.000.00 $22.600.15 5134.69 S590.58 $525.00 S1.762.55 $80.75 DESCRIPTION 5 HARDWARE CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES TRAINING REGISTRATION - --" LAB SUPPLIES INSTRUMENT PARTS CHEMICALS_ --_— LAB SUPPLIES CHLORINE M.0.2-14-90 CHEMICALS ---___—_-- MEDICAL CONSULTING TOOL FITTINGS _ .__._...._..._--. SPECIALTY GASES MUNICIPAL RADIO SERVICE AGREEMENT DATA PROCESSING FEES - P/R DEDUCTION REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE HOSE - - - - — AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY INSTRUMENT PARTS SAFETY SUPPLIES - RENTAL EQUIPMENT TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS PAGERS - BEEPING SERVICE- ---- -- LEGAL SERVICES M.0.12-12-90 TRUCK PARTS AUDITING SERVICES M.0:3-13-91- - - - DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 HARDWARE' - - - --- CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-87 VALVE REPAIRS ICE - - - — --- INSTRUMENTATION SERVICES M.0.7-17-91 MOTOR REPAIRS TRASH REMOVAL - —_--` RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.3-13-91 STREET SWEEPING SERVICES TEMPORARY SERVICES _..__.._.__. POSTAGE INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES - TRUCK -PARTS"- -" TOOLS DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION FITTINGS PARTS CLEANER FUND NG 9199 - JT DIST WCRKING CAPITAL WARRANT NO. VENDOR PROCESSING DATE 10/17/91 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS, OFORANGE COUNTY_ CLAIMS PAID 10/23/91 POSTING DATE 10/23/91 AMOUNT-- 117859 SAFETY SUFPLY CT AMERICA S192.73 117860 SANCON_ ENGINEERING INC S_49_800.00 117AE1 SANTA ANA RIVER FLOOD i1r400.00 117862 SANWA RANK S2499g2.60 117863 DCLG SAR%IS S650.00_ 117864 SCHWING _APERICA $1,00.52 117865 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT•L $379892.64 117866 SEA -BIRD ELECTRONICS INC 1226.00 117861 SEA COAST DESIGNS f758.56 117868 SHAMROCK SLPPLY $266.69 117869_ _ SILVERI 8 LE BOUEF $1171804_.60 117870 SIPPLEX ANt. $231.93 117871 SMITH -EVERY CO $3r901.50 117872 SM.ITh PIFE E SUPPLY INC S445.98 ii7873 SONNENSCNEIN NATF 9' RCSENIH $37.56 117874 SORENSON CABINETS $193000 117875 SO COAST AIR QUALITY 5185.OQ 117876 SCAQMO UPDATE TRAINING $125.00 117877 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO S1769254.C9 117878 SC CAL CAS CC S41466.50 _ 117879 SO CALIFCFNIA GAS CO S335r46B.57 117880 SGUTFERN CCUNTIES CIL CC S59005.20 117881 SOUVENIR FHOTO $134.90 117882 SPAAKLETTS DRINKING WATER S29439.26 117883 STAMEN Z SPASSCFF PE S39900000 117984 STAR TOOL B SUPPLY CC $897.20 117885 STATE STREET BANK S3r606.25 _ 117886 SUMMIT STEEL S1r012.18 117887 SUN -BELT LANDSCAPE _ 9 MAINT. _. -_ S31B47.,00_,.-_. 11788A SUNSET ECRU $165.08 117869 SUPELCO INC S353.00 .117890 _ _ FALLrPUNRCE/SIEETLANCI INC S2.8.8,5 117891 SYSTAT $900.00 117892 TALIN TIRE INC S306.70 127893 _ TAUBER ELECTRONICS $514.74 �117894 TAYLCR-CUNN PFG COMPANY 5509.63 117895 ThCMAS BFCS PAFS S971.04 117896 THOMAS EQUIPMENT RENTALS $7r675.00 117897 THCHAS FISH COMPANY S268.13 117858 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY S401.30 117899 THOMFSON PUBLISHING GRCUF S196.50 117900 THCRFE INSLLATICN 5630.34 117901 3H TELCCPP FRCCUCTS GIV S79.23 117902 TILLINGHAST _ $247.00 117903 TONYrS LCCK 8 SAFE SERVICE $457.43 117904 TOP INOLS7RIAL $74.06 D ESCRIPTION-_- SIGNS MANHOLE REPAIRS DIST 3 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL-- -._...___-- CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 14-1-2 CPR & FIRST AID TRAINING ELECTRIC PARTS ._-.--- -- -- OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-12-91 LAB SUPPLIES OFFICE FURNITURE - - -- TOOLS CONSTRUCTION 5-34-3 -PUMP_ .. -- SOIL TESTING M.0.7-17-91 PLUMBING SUPPLIES LEGAL SERVICES = PERSONNEL -MATTERS- -- OFFICE FURNITURE PERMIT FEES - SEMINAR REGISTRATION --- POWER NATURAL GAS PIPELINE RELOCATION M.0.9-11-91 DIESEL/UNLEADED FUEL FILM PROCESSING --" DRINKING WATER/COOLER-RENTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES M.0.2-14-90 TOOLS C:O.P:-TRUSTEE EXPENSES—— BUILDING MATERIALS CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING H.0.8-9-89 " --- -- TRUCK -' PARTS- -- LAB SUPPLIES FITTINGS COMPUTER SOFTWARE ------- TRUCK TIRES BATTERIES TRUCK PARTS-" -- - PUBLICATION EQUIPMENT RENTALS LAB SUPPLIES -- HARDWARE SUBSCRIPTION ---"---BUILIIING' MATERIALS - INSTRUMENT PARTS CONSULTING - EARTHQUAKE/PROP. RES. STDY REPLACE LOCK - --- - -- - BUILDING MATERIALS m X 2 bd to I FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/17/91 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS FAID 10/23/91 POSTING DATE 10/23/91 WARRANT NC, VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 117905 TRAVEL TRAVEL $69264.99 TRAVEL SERVICES M.0.6-12-91 117906 TRUCK b AUTO SUPPLY INC S319.98 TRUCK PARTS 117907 JG TUCKER b SCN INC _ _ $830.18 INSTRUMENT PARTS - — - —` 117908 TUSTIN CCCGE $727.69 TRUCK PARTS 117909 US AUTO GLASS CENTERS S261.32 TRUCK PARTS __ 117910 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT $198.00 UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SERVICE 117911 UNOCAL $135.49 UNLEADED GASOLINE 117912 THE UNISCLRCE CCRP S72.62 OFFICE SUPPLIES 117913 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $157.95 PARCEL SERVICE- 117914 UNITEC STATES ELEVATOR COPP $517900 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 111915_ VOC i9t995.00.. EMISSIONS TESTING - 117916 .TESTING. VYR SCIENTIFIC S99133,44 LAB -SUPPLIES 117917 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO $2v560.81 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 117938_ VAN REINHOLD $674,45 PUBLICATION _ 117919 _NOSTPANO VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $39429.23 LAB SUPPLIES --' -- 117920 VERTEX SYSTEMS $69697950 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT VIKING,_ INCUSTRIAL T729.46.. SAFETY SUPPLIES —'•-� _117921__._ _. 117922 .SUPPLY _ VILLAGE NURSERIES $211944 _ LANDSCAPE'SUPPLIES — 117923 CARL WARREN b CO S300.00 LIABILITY CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 117924 WESTERN STATES_ CHEMICAL SUPPLY $58_9559.73 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-8-90 _ 117926 WESTINGhOLSE ELECTRIC SUPPLY $183944 ELECTRIC PARTS 117926 WILLARD PARKING DEVICES S68.11 OFFICE MACHINE REPAIRS 117927____ NILLCAN, ASSCCIATES S5t103i.64 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-26-3, 2-28 _ ._ 17 1928 .. _ kEHOIi C60 .._,.. $69543.82 " 117929 GEORGE YARDLEY CO S174.19 VALVES ZIVHAR7H 8 ALPRR/COOPER $276t311.87 CONSTRUCTION P1-34-1 _117930- 11793!__" RIChARD E ECGAR $200000 wwwww�wwwwwwwwwww DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION- — TOTAL CLAIMS FAID IU/23/91 S3.7859168.90 C FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/17/91 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY - --- - -"- "" CLAIMS PAID 10/23/91 POSTING DATE 10/23191------ SUMMARY AMOUNT #1 OPER FUND $1,141.83 #1 CAP FAC FUND $3,523.31 #2 OPER FUND $24,401.79 #2 CAP -FAC FUND $586,904.12 -- - - #3 OPER FUND $34,481.26 #3 CAP FAC FUND $52,345.19 #5 OPER FUND $4,902.23 --- #5 CAP FAC FUND $119,008.60 #6 OPER FUND $255.28 #7 OPER-FUND _. _ _ - #7 CAP FAC FUND $412,871.51 #11 OPER FUND $15,100.85 #13 OPER FUND $76.78— #14 OPER FUND $44.91 #14 CAP FAC FUND $255,014.53 m #5&6-CAP FAC-FUND _ _ __.. - - $7,046.62 - x #7&14 OPER FUND $4,853.65 = JT OPER FUND $751,484.89 CORF -- $1,217,241.57 -- - .- SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $4,480.68 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $283,975.09 bCJ $3,785,168.90 RE; AGENDA ITEM! NO. 18 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRI of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA December 5, 1991 C O N F I D E N T I A L STAFF REPORT Proposed Change Order No. 8 to Central Power Generation Svstem at Treatment Plant No. 2 Job No. J-19-2 Summary 10844 ELLIS AVENUE PO BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9 [71 M 962-24 11 Job No. J-19-2 at Plant No. 2 is part of the new $66 million master -planned Central Power Generation System which is being built under several contracts at both plants. This $20 million construction contract includes installation of five pre -purchased digester -gas burning, spark -ignited 4167 horsepower engines with generators which are each capable of producing 3000 KW of electrical power, plus three pre -purchased gas compressors. Proposed Change Order No. 8 resolves a serious dispute over two items on this job. The two items are: Late delivery of Districts -furnished digester gas compressors which, in addition, were much larger and heavier than indicated in the plans and specifications. o Design quality control issues regarding electrical equipment. The most significant of the items is the late compressor delivery. This change order resolves the dispute between the Contractor, Brinderson, and the Districts over seven claims submitted by the contractor, totalling $4,500,000 and a requested 660 calendar days time extension. It resolves all major issues to date on this contract for a change order adding $409,110.00 and 200 calendar days to the contract. Background This contract, like many of the contracts in progress at both treatment facilities, is tied to other construction and procurement contracts. For instance, the large engine and generator sets had to be delivered by Brinderson to the treatment plant under this contract once they were received from the manufacturer at the railhead under a separate $20 million contract with Cooper Energy Services, Job No. J-19A. Guarantees were placed in both the manufacturer's (Cooper) contract for the engines and the construction contractor's (Brinderson) contract as to when the engines would be delivered. A similar procurement guarantee was included for the large digester gas compressors purchased separately from Pennsylvania Process Compressors (Penn) under Job No. P1-34-1 and installed under Job No. J-19-2. It is the digester gas compressor procurement (late delivery and larger than specified equipment) that has led to most of the contract difficulties. A second major issue is the design approval, inspection and delivery of certain electrical equipment. Our consultant recommended certain changes after the contract was awarded, and staff was most concerned about the ability of the equipment manufacturer to produce a quality product. The completion of the Central Power Generation System project at the Huntington Beach Treatment Plant is of vital economic importance to the Districts in that digester gas will be used to fully power the plant thus offsetting the high cost of purchased power from Southern California Edison. This contract therefore includes a bonus/penalty provision of $3,000 per calendar day. This means that for each day the contract is completed before the contract -specified time of 730 calendar days, the contractor would earn a $3,000 bonus; conversely, for each day it is completed later than the contract specified time, a penalty of $3,000 per day would be assessed. Brinderson Corporation submitted schedules at the beginning of the job which indicated that the project would be completed 170 calendar days early. The schedule was based on the delivery of Districts' -furnished equipment, including the Cooper engines and the Penn compressors, in accordance with the dates given in the contract documents. Brinderson made tremendous efforts early on in the project, working long hours and committing large crews to stay on their schedule. Delays in the deliveries of the Districts' -furnished Penn compressors impacted the job schedule. When a job is delayed, such as this contract, by late delivery of promised equipment, there are several impacts. First is the loss of contract - specified bonus payments. Second, the contract itself stays in progress and all indirect job costs associated with that work, including office expense, overhead expenses, etc., continue to be incurred, which Brinderson estimated at $5,935 per calendar day. Lastly are the actual work changes, or direct costs. Direct costs include the actual cost of labor, materials and equipment with profit and overhead added in accordance with the Districts' General Contract Provisions. Digester Gas Compressors This contract called for the installation of three gas compressors manufactured by Penn. The compressors were procured under a similar project, Job No. P1-34-1 awarded to Ziebarth & Alper under a project at Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley. The Ziebarth & Alper contract calls for the furnishing of six gas compressors, three to be installed at Plant No. 1 under Ziebarth & Alper's construction contract, and three to be delivered to Plant No. 2 for installation by Brinderson within an existing building. (It was desirable to have all six compressors furnished by the same manufacturer for maintenance and parts compatibility.) Brinderson's contract, Job No. J-19-2, states that the compressors will be available in August 1990, well before they would have been needed. For various reasons, they were not delivered at that time but had little ,job impact until the fall of 1990. In late fall 1990, staff was notified by Penn that the gas compressors could not be built within the size specified unless the Districts allowed changing certain parts of the compressor skid layout. Staff then considered deleting the Plant 2 compressors from Ziebarth & Alper's contract because the -2- compressors would not fit into the Plant No. 2 gas compressor building. Penn then proposed certain changes to the compressor skid which would allow the compressors to fit inside the Plant No. 2 compressor building. Staff agreed to the changes provided that the necessary changes would be at no cost to the Districts. It was also agreed that the compressors at Plant No. 2 would be delivered before the Plant No. 1 compressors. Penn submitted a delivery schedule on November 5, 1990 promising shipment of the first gas compressor for Plant No. 2 by March 18, 1991. Penn notified staff on January 29, 1991 that shipment for the first plant No. 2 compressor would be delayed until April 22, 1991. Change Order No. 4, approved in March 1991, provided that the Contractor would accept a new delivery date for the Penn compressors, the first full unit to be delivered by May 15, 1991, well beyond Penn's initial promised delivery date of March 15, 1991 (the contract -specified date was August 1990). It was believed that the issue regarding Penn compressors was resolved by Change Order No. 4 at no additional cost to the Districts. Penn then notified staff on April 26, 1991 that the first Plant No. 2 compressor would not ship until May 17, 1991 due to the use of incorrect bolts used to assemble the compressor. This was late and impacted Brinderson's schedule. The first Plant No. 2 compressor skid arrived at the Plant No. 2 site in June 1991. However, the shipment was not complete. This incomplete delivery further impacted Brinderson's schedule. Complete delivery was not accomplished until August 12, 1991. The second problem with the digester gas compressors was their size and weight. The digester gas compressors were indicated to be of certain size, weight and configuration in the contract drawings. Those dimensions and weights were based on information that John Carolio Engineers and Brown and Caldwell Engineers obtained from Penn and other manufacturers during the design of the facilities at each plant and they were included in the Brinderson and Ziebarth & Alper contracts. In fact, the compressors actually received from Penn were of much greater size and weight. At the Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant, the new compressor building was of sufficient size so that the larger compressors could be installed within the building with minor adjustments. Just the opposite was true of Brinderson's contract at the Huntington Beach Treatment Plant. Under Job No. J-19-2, Brinderson was required to place the three new compressors in an existing compressor building replacing five older compressors. The contract sequencing called for the removal of two existing compressors and installation of one new Penn compressor at a time. As each new compressor was proven, an additional existing compressor was to be removed and a new one installed in its place. This would result in having three new compressors and one engine -driven compressor to meet the needs of the new central power generation facility. (The treatment plant must have digester gas compressors operating around -the -clock.) Because of the large size of the compressors, the Brinderson contract -planned sequencing could not be followed. The new compressors had to be dismantled in order to be installed within the building since their size was bigger than the openings in the building, and their weight greater than the building's bridge crane could handle. Three compressors had to be removed -3- instead of two in order for two of the new Penn compressors to be installed. That impacted the Districts' operational reliability requirements. Therefore, under Change Order No. 7, the contractor was compensated for removing one of the existing larger capacity compressors from the building and installing it temporarily outside to maintain the needed compressor reliability for ongoing operational activities. This all lengthened compressor installation time, again delaying the contract and adding direct charges as well as indirect (job impact) costs. Toshiba Electrical Switchgear A second issue arose on the Brinderson project, and staff tied the two together under Change Order No. 4. The second issue is the furnishing of Toshiba medium voltage (I2 KV) switchgear for the central generation project. The specifications required Brinderson to furnish General Electric switchgear or a product of equal quality. Brinderson, its subcontractor, and their proposed supplier, Toshiba, maintained that the Toshiba switchgear was, in fact, equal to GE. Staff had doubts. Exhaustive engineering studies were conducted by staff and the Districts' design consultant, Brown and Caldwell, to insure that Toshiba could, in fact, meet the job specifications. However, the necessary Districts' engineering work to assure a quality Toshiba product was excessive as compared with equipment of other manufacturers which include GE and Westinghouse. Change Order No. 4, mentioned above, also provided that the Districts would accept Toshiba switchgear at no additional cost or deduction to the contract. It was believed that the issue regarding Toshiba switchgear was resolved by Change Order No. 4 at no additional cost to the Districts. After the Boards of Directors approved Change Order No. 4 which allowed Toshiba switchgear, submittals from Toshiba continued. Staff and the consulting design engineers had to assign an inordinate amount of time to ensure that the switchgear was designed correctly by Toshiba and to do an excessive amount of quality control work at the Toshiba manufacturing plant in Houston, Texas, during the witness testing. However, Toshiba was impacted by additional design changes recommended by the Districts' designer. Some of those changes added direct costs and impacted the project schedule. The largest design change was the switching of grounding transformers by the consultant which was precipitated by changing requirements imposed by Southern California Edison. The plans and specifications called for a dry -type grounding transformer; the consultant strongly recommended that this be a wet -type, and while the recommendation was valid this change did, in fact, add delays and costs to the contract. Proposed Change Order No. 8 This change order, Change Order No. 8, resolves the job impacts, granting additional contract extensions and provides that no job impact charges will be paid for design changes. The Districts' position was that the design changes, while adding costs and delay, did not delay job impact costs in that they were already added'by the compressor problem (discussed above). It is a resolution of issues between the Districts and the Contractor. -4- The direct costs (claimed to be $500,000 by Brinderson but estimated at about $150,000 by staff) are not included in this change order, since they have not been received from the contractor or the contractor's suppliers and will be presented to the Directors at a later date. However, direct costs are much more easily controlled than indirect costs in that they must follow the criteria of the General Provisions. Change Order No. 8 is summarized below, as follows: Change Order No. 8, items 1A and 1B provide for a time extension of 88 days and job impact costs of $287,500.00 for late delivery of the compressors, and direct costs of $50,728.000, a 50-calendar day time extension and $9,000.00 for job impact costs for modification to the foundations and disassembly and reassembly so the compressors could be installed in the existing compressor building. Item 2, in the amount of $30,635.00, is for changing a grounding transformer from an indoor dry type to an exterior oil type which is necessary to comply with Edison grounding requirements. This grounding transformer is needed to permit detection and isolation of ground faults which is a major safety precaution. This change requires a 62-day time extension. Item 3, in the amount of $41,248.00, is for certain electrical changes within the Gas Compressor Building. These changes are needed as a result of the recently adopted standards for wastewater treatment facilities per the National Fire Protection Association 820. Item 4 is a credit of $10,000.00 for resolution of issues regarding Toshiba motor control centers and switchgear. The credit is compensation for administrative costs incurred to insure that Toshiba furnishes satisfactory shop drawings and equipment in accordance with the contract documents. o Item 5 is for authorization to resolve direct costs in a future change order for several plan clarifications and design changes issued to the Contractor which resulted in additional materials and labor to produce the 12 KV switchgear. The item provides that there will be no future time extensions or job impact costs associated with all identified design changes on this contract. Item 6 is a no cost item which provides additional information to explain the requirements to assess the Contractor's liquidated damages or for the District to pay for a bonus. This item also establishes a maximum bonus, in the amount of $525,000.00, which the Contractor can earn (currently, there is no maximum bonus amount for adjusted early completion.) The above -described changes to the electrical equipment would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. The problems with the compressor, items 1A and 1B, are not design related. General Counsel and staff are jointly reviewing this matter to see if cost recovery from Penn is possible and will report back to the Directors later. -5- Recommendation Staff and General Counsel recommend approval of Change Order No. 8 adding $409,110.00 and 200 calendar days to the contract with Brinderson Corporation to resolve the dispute with the contractor pertaining to their claims for $4,500,000.00 and a 660-day time extension. TMO:jt ENG/J/19-2:SR1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Eight (8) CONTRACTOR: BRINDERSON CORPORATION DATE December 11, 1991 JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-19-2 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Beduet) $ 409,111.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - DELAY IN DELIVERY OF COMPRESSORS A. Under Change Order 4, Item 6, the Contractor agreed to an extension of the delivery date of three Districts' furnished compressors to be installed under this contract to May 15, 1991. This item provided that in the event the equipment delivery was delayed beyond that date, the contractor would be granted a time extension on a day -for -day basis untill the actual date of delivery. The final delivery of all pertinent compressor equipment for one compressor was made on August 12, 1991, an 88-day delay. The Contractor has requested both the 88-day time extension as well as extended overhead in the amount of $522,300.03. Staff has negotiated and verified job impact costs of $287,500.00 which Contractor freely and voluntarily accepts. Contractor waives any and all further claims to job impact or extended overhead and time delays relating directly or indirectly to the late delivery of compres- sor equipment. B. Change Order No. 4, Change Order No. 6 and Change Order No. 7 noted that the compressors, as received, were not manufactured in accordance with the specifications. This District furnished equipment has been installed by the contractor. The compressors were larger, requiring modifications to the foundations and disassembly and reassembly so that the compressors could be installed in the existing compressor building. There are direct charges for the assembly and disassembly and foundation modifications, extended overhead charges and time extensions associated with this extra work. The Contractor's proposal to accomplish the work was in the amount of $328,826.83 and 50 calendar days. The additional work to install the compressors was accomplished on a force account basis in accordance with Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions, plus extended overhead. Contractor accepts $50,728.00 as complete and final settlement for direct cost for this item, and $9,000.00 for job impact costs. Contractor has also requested an additional 50-day time extension for this work which Districts accepts. Contractor waives any and all further claims to damages or time delays of any kind relating directly or indirectly to the work covered in this item. u COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER CONTRACTOR: BRINDERSON CORPORATION Page 2 of 6 C. 0. NO. Eight (8) DATE December 11, 1991 JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-19-2 Item 2 - CHANGE GROUNDING TRANSFORMER The Districts' designers requested that the grounding transformer be changed from an indoor dry type to an exterior oil type which is necessary to comply with Edison grounding requirements. The grounding transformer is needed to permit detection and isolation of a ground fault on the 12 KV distribution system when central generation is operating isolated from Edison. This is a major safety precaution for the generator operation. This change results in a delay to the start-up of the facility, as the electrical switchgear cannot be energized safely. The Contractor's proposal to accomplish the work was in the amount of $1,619,570.59 and 289 calendar days. The cost of this item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions, in the amount of $30,635.00. Contractor accepts as final and complete settlement $30,635.00 for this item and a 62-day time extension. Contractor waives all further claims to damages or time extensions relating directly or indirectly to the work described in this item. Item 3 - RECLASSIFICATION OF GAS COMPRESSOR BUILDING The Districts' staff has requested that certain electrical changes be made within the Gas Compressor Building. These changes are needed as a result of the newly adopted standards for wastewater treatment facilities per the National Fire Protection Association 820. The area within the building is considered a hazardous location which is Class 1, Division 2. This change has also caused additional time delays, as well as added costs. The change consists of: installing seals where conduits are routed from non --classified areas into the classified areas. Seals are also required within 18 inches of all arcing devices plus other minor changes to conduit and wiring. The additional work to install the electrical seals and other minor work is being accomplished on Contractor's force account basis. Contractor requests and Districts approve work not to exceed $41,248.00 for the added work. Contractor waives all further claims to damages or time extensions relating directly or indirectly to the work described in this item. SUMMARY OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT FOR ITEMS 1, 2, AND 3: Item Direct Job Impact Cost Costs Calendar Days Time Extension 1A. Late delivery of `" compressor $ 0.00 $287,500.00 88 Days COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Eight (8) CONTRACTOR: BRINDERSON CORPORATION DATE December 11, 1991 JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-19-2 Direct Job Impact Calendar Days Cost Costs Time Extension 1B. Additional work because of larger compressor size $50,728.00 $ 9,000.00 50 Days 2. Change from dry grounding transformers to wet grounding transformers 30,635.00 0.00 62 Days 3. 1990 National Fire Code 41,248.00 0.00 0 Days $122,611.00 $296,500.00 200 Days In accordance with the above summary, the contractor is granted additional costs of $419,111.00 plus a time extension of 200 calendar days for Items 1, 2, and 3. Item 4 - RESOLUTION OF ISSUES REGARDING TOSHIBA MOTOR CONTROL CENTERS AND SWITCHGEAR Change Order 4, Item 5, authorized Toshiba switchgear on the job. This was subject to Districts approval of shop drawings for this equipment. Shop drawing approval is contingent on shop drawings which are found to meet the plans and specifications. The manufacture of the switchgear is substantially late adversely affecting the critical path of the project. The original contract completion date of March 1992 will not be met. Districts contend that the Toshiba switchgear shop drawings were poorly prepared causing substantial delays in the eventual manufacture and delivery of this equipment. Contractor and his agents have contended otherwise. This Item 4 is intended to settle this dispute as follows: a) In consideration of Districts' cooperation in resolving the various other issues in this change order and this matter, Contractor agrees tc pay to Districts by credit the amount of $10,000.00 to compensate Districts for its administrative costs incurred to insure that Toshiba fully and completely render satisfactory shop drawings for the switchgear and that equipment is made in accordance with plans, specifications and shop drawings as that process now occurs in Houston, Texas. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER CONTRACTOR: BRINDERSON CORPORATION Page 4 of 6 C. 0. NO. Eight (8) DATE December 11, 1991 JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. J-19-2 b) Contractor agrees by execution of this change order that he shall waive and release all claims, known or unknown including but not 'limited to damages, claims, job impacts, extended overhead, or time delays against Districts and that Contractor shall not file any new claims of any kind whatsoever relating directly or indirectly to the switchgear as described herein (exclusive of direct costs described in Item 5). This waiver and release does not apply to any new request by Districts for additional equipment, or time or material costs in accordance with Section 10-6 of the General Provisions. The Contractor acknowledges that the switchgear is still being both manufactured and tested at Houston, Texas. Accordingly, this settlement does not affect, limit, or restrict Districts on -going inspection and testing procedure of the switchgear. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $(10,000.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 5 - MISCELLANEOUS 12 KV SWITCHGEAR CHANGES Several plan clarifications have been issued to the Contractor which resulted in additional materials needed or changes to the 12 KV switchgear. There are also design changes required as a result of submittal and testing process. The changes are either design changes for the equipment or for added items to make the equipment functional due to changed operating conditions or criteria. All of the added work for this item has been accomplished prior to delivery or installation of the switchgear. The Contractor's proposal for the added work is $1,993,755.33 plus a time extension of 233 days. None of the direct costs have been validated. When the final costs are known, a change order will be issued for direct charges. As of the date of Board authorization of this change order item, the Contractor agrees that no time extensions, job impact or indirect (extended overhead) charges have been incurred by the Contractor. Only direct costs in accordance with Section 10-8 of the General Provisions will be considered in the future change order concerning this item. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Eight (8) CONTRACTOR: BRINDERSON CORPORATION DATE December 11, 1991 JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-19-2 Item 6 - CRITERIA FOR RECEIPT OF EARLY COMPLETION BONUS As part of the negotiations for the time extensions and extended overhead, the following information further explains the requirements for bonus and liquidated damages and sets a maximum amount of bonus which the Contractor can earn. Districts agree that the bonus will be calculated beginning the first day after the following criteria have been met: The Central Generation facility must be operated in parallel with Edison for a 5-day period. The 5-day period consists of Monday through Friday starting at 8 a.m. Monday and ending at 3 p.m. Friday. All generators must be operated during the test period, but not all at once. Four generators will be operated with three generators at full load if gas is available and if the power can be used. Otherwise, the generators will be operated according to available gas and power needs. The generators must be operated in the auto mode for a minimum of 50 percent of the time. In the event that power cannot be exported to Edison during parallel operation as described above, the generators will be operated in the isolated mode, thereby generating power for the total available Plant 2 electrical load. The total number of generators operated will be governed by the power load or available gas. The bonus/liquidated damages remains at $3,000 per calendar day. In the event the above sequence occurs after October 11, 1992, the Contractor will be assessed liquidated damages of $3,000 per calendar day. In the event the above occurs prior to October 11, 1992, the Contractor will be allowed a bonus of $3,000 per calendar day. Contractor and Districts agree, however, that in no event shall the Districts pay more than a total of $525,000.00 in bonus payments for early completion, regardless of when the Contractor reaches a completion date under the criteria set forth in this Item 6. In the event future change orders include time extensions, the bonus amount will be increased on a day -for -day basis. The revised date of Contract Completion is now October 11, 1992. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $409,111.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 200 Calendar Days COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER CONTRACTOR: BRINDERSON CORPORATION Page 6 of 6 C. 0. NO. Eight _(8) DATE December 11, 1991 JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J--19--2 Based upon the foregoing, it is therefore mutually agreed that 200 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date March 19, 1990 Original Contract Time 730 Calendar Days Original Completion Date March 17, 1992 Time Extension this C.O. 200 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 208 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 938 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date October 11, 1992 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 19,753,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 550,260.20 This Change (Add) (B) $ 409,111.00 Amended Contract Price $ 20,712,371.20 Board Authorization Date: December 11, 1991 COUNTY OF SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA D Engineer Date Zreftor BY: of Eng veering Date BRINDERSON CORPORATION ACCEPTED BY: Contractor Date REC ENDED BY: C struction Manager Date APPROVED AS TO FORM: C)�e4l�t W /q � Genera Counsel Date rQ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA November 19, 1991 STAFF REPORT Techite Pipe Claim BACKGROUND 108" ELLIS AVENUE P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 9272E (714) 962-2411 `�►� Techite pipe was made from a fiberglass base in a glue media. Between 1967 and 1982 the Districts used techite pipe as an alternate material for force main construction. In the past two years, the Districts have experienced failures in some of the techite pipe force mains. The Districts have since learned that the techite pipe manufacturer's claims regarding the pipe's inert properties may be false. Based on the Districts recent experience and because of the scarcity of repair kits, it is recommended that the Districts study the replacement of the techite pipe and to pursue a claim against the manufacturer. The General Counsel, under separate report, is recommending that a co -counsel be retained to determine whether a legal claim for fraud can be pursued against the manufacturer. The facilities that should be replaced include the following: - Navy Way Pump Station Force Main, Contract No. 7-2AP-1 - Westminster Avenue Force Main, First Unit, Contract No. 3-13 - Westminster Avenue Force Main, Second Unit, Contract No. 3-13-1 - Westside Relief Interceptor, Contract No. 3-21-1 - Rehabilitation of Ellis Avenue Force Main, Contract No. I-111-1 - Gisler Trunk Sewer, Force Main, Contract No. 7-1, Schedule C - Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Trunk, Contract 5-19 Navy Way Pump Station Force Main The Navy Way Pump Sation Force Main, Contract No. 7-2AP-1, installed in 1969, consists of 2,593 linear feet of 16-inch techite pipe in Edinger Avenue. The pump station receives flows from Contract No. 7-2A subtrunk then pumps the flows to the Gisler -Red Hill Trunk Sewer System. Agreements are being negotiated with District No. 14 and IRWD that may allow flows from the Navy Way Pump Station to be diverted to the IRWD Harvard Avenue Trunk Sewer (HATS), thereby allowing the pump station and force main to be abandoned. Surveys indicate that a gravity sewer can be constructed parallel to and south of the Santa Ana Santa Fe Channel and AT&SF railway to the HATS system, west of the Peters Canyon Channel. Preliminary estimates indicate that the Navy Way Pump Station and Force Main could be abandoned by constructing 6,173 linear feet of 21-inch gravity sewer per the alignment described above. This would require an easement from where Edinger Avenue curves south to the connection west of Peters Canyon Channel. While the capital costs of constructing the gravity sewer ($1,296,000.00) is \� much higher than the capital cost of the force main replacement ($300,000), the 4 I*M� savings in annual maintenance and energy costs plus the added reliability of a gravity system lead the staff to recommend that the Navy Way Pump Station and techite pipe force main be abandoned and the 21-inch gravity sewer installed. Westminster Avenue Force Main, First Unit The Westminster Avenue Force Main, First Unit, Contract No. 3-13, installed in 1970, is the system with the worst record of pipe failures. It has had three breaks, two directly related to pipe material failure. The force main is 14,308 linear feet, 30-inch techite pipe running from Seal Beach Boulevard to Hammon Place in Westminster Boulevard. It is recommended that this techite pipe force main be replaced with ductile iron pipe of the same size, or be replaced with a ductile iron pipe of a larger size in the event that Westminster Force Main, Second Unit, is not replaced. Westminster Force Main, Second Unit The Westminster Avenue Force Main, Second Unit, Contract No. 3-13-1, installed in 1978, is 14,288 linear feet of 30-inch techite pipe encased in concrete and running 9.5 feet north of, and parallel to, the First Unit. This pipe is eight years newer than the First Unit. It is recommended that alternatives, including replacement with ductile iron pipe, or rehabilitation of the line through sliplining, or leaving the line as an empty stand-by force main, be considered. Westside Relief Interceptor The techite pipe installed as part of the Westside Relief Interceptor, Contract No. 3-21-1, installed in 1975, is a 45 linear foot segment of single barrel 20-inch force main installed as a rerouting of the existing force main from the Westside Lift Station to allow for the construction of the Westside Relief Sewer. It is recommended that the line be replaced with ductile iron pipe. Rehabilitation of Ellis Avenue Force Main The Rehabilitation of Ellis Avenue Force Main, Contract No. I-1R-1, installed in 1982, consists of 6,494 L.F. of techite liner from Bushard Street to Plant No. 1 in Ellis Avenue. The liner was installed to convert the existing gravity line into a force main. The Ellis Avenue Pump Station and Force Main were constructed to divert flows to Plant No. 1 to maintain the Plants' minimum flow standards between the hours of 2:00 a.m. and 4:00 a.m. The pump station currently pumps an average of 1.4 million gallons per day (mgd) during these morning hours. If flows could be diverted upstream of the pump station, or when flows increase with increasing population, it would become feasible to abandon the Ellis Avenue Pump Station. It is'not recommended to replace the force main at this time. -2- Gisler Trunk Sewer Force Main The Gisler Trunk Sewer Force Main, Contract No. 7-1, Schedule C, installed in 1967, consists of 1,833 linear feet of 21-inch techite pipe running from the College Avenue Pump Station to just east of Iowa Street in Gisler Street. The City of Costa Mesa is planning to widen the 405 freeway, east of Bristol Street. As a result of the freeway widening, portions of the Gisler -Red Hill Trunk Sewer will be abandoned. The effects of the Gisler -Red Hill Abandonment are currently under study, per Contract 7-1-1. The results of the study will recommend the size of Gisler Trunk Sewer Force Main to meet the future capacity requirements. It is recommended that this techite pipe be replaced per the size recommended in the aforementioned study. Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Trunk The techite pipe installed as part of the Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Trunk, Contract 5-19, installed in 1973, is a 1,125 linear -foot segment of 24-inch techite liner installed to rehabilitate a portion of the Plan 401 sewer in Pacific Coast Highway, east of Newport Boulevard. This line has been identified as hydraulically deficient in our 1989 Master Plan, and is scheduled for replacement in the future. ENG/D3:SR1.1, -3 -3- BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS P.O. Box 8127. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 AGENDA WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 11, 1991 - 7:30 P.M. RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 Minute excerpts have been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item No. 4, it is appropriate to receive and file said excerpts: (4) (a) DISTRICTS 2 & 3 Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpt from the City of La Habra re election of mayor and appointment of alternate Directors, as follows: (*Mayor) District Active Director Alternate Director 2 William D. Mahoney James H. Flora* 3 James H. Flora* William D. Mahoney (b) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpt from the City of Los Alamitos re election of mayor and appointment of alternate Director, as follows: (*Mayor) District Active Director Alternate Director 3 Charles E. Sylvia. Ronald Bates* (c) DISTRICTS 2 & 13 Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpt from the City of Yorba Linda re election of mayor and appointment of alternate Directors, as follows: (*Mayor) District Active Director Alternate Director 2 Henry W. Wedaa Irwin Fried* 13 John M. Gullixson Irwin Fried* C Ck 3 V , REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN DECEMBER 11, 1991 1) CHANGE OF FEBRUARY MEETING DATE THE REGULAR JOINT BOARD MEETING DATE, WEDNESDAY , FEBRUARY 12, 1991, IS A LEGAL HOLIDAY. THE FOLLOWING DAY, THURSDAY , FEBRUARY 13, IS THE LEAGUE OF CITIES' REGULAR MEETING DATE. IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT THE JOINT BOARDS DECLARE THEIR INTENT TO CONDUCT THEIR REGULAR FEBRUARY MEETING ON WEDNESDAY , FEBRUARY 19, 1992. -c�� UPCOMING MEETINGS A. FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY . DECEMRFR 18TH AT 5:30 P.M. - END OF REPORT- MEETING DATE 2 / 1 i / 9 I rY j1(4Y.A) TIME 7 : 30 P.M. DISTRICTS 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , b , 7 , 1 1 , 1 3 & 14 DISISICT1 JO1NT BOARDS wJ (RICHARDSON) ... GRISET ....... _✓ (BEYER) .................... BARRERA ..... �I - 4 (EDGAR) ........ PUCKETT ...... JL (DENES) .........pp........... BELL ......... se- (BEYER) ......... BARRERA ..... ,G {AGE) ......e&mwjw ..... ✓ _ (ROTH) .......... STANTON ..... �z (NORBY) ..................CATLIN ....... ✓ (FERRYMAN) ..... WAHNER ...... (SCOTT) .................... COLLINS ...... ✓ + DISTRICT 2 N (PLUMMER) ................. ee» .......... (� {MAIN) ...................... CULVER ...... �C (HUNTER) ....... PICKLER ...... a Q- (NELSON, C.) ................ DUNLAP ...... (SCOTT) ......... COLLINS ...... �G (PUCKETT) .................. EDGAR ....... MEYER) ......... BARRERA ..... ✓ -� N (HUNTER) ................... EHRLE ........ �C (DENES) ........ BELL .......... !/ (RICE) - - - . • ................. EVANS ........ (NORBY) ........ CATLIN ........ (MAHONEY) ................. FLORA ........ _✓ (FLORA) ......... MAHONEY ..... �� L �, (ROBITAILLE) ................ GREEN ....... �� { (CULVER) ....... MAIN .......... (McCUNE) ................... GRIFFIN ....... �C (PARKER) ....... NELSON. C..... fir_ (RICHARDSON) .............. GRISET ....... . (DOWNEY) ....... NEWTON ...... a (3- (FRIED) ..................... GULLIXSON ... _✓ (GRISET) ........ }tl9MIW6...... . (PLUMMER) ................. HART ......... (ROTH ........ ..STANTON ..... (SILVA).....................KELLY ........ . C� (FRIED) ......... WEDAA ....... (WILSON) ................... LASZLO ....... DISTRICT 3 (FLORA) .................... MAHONEY ..... _�C =1 (CULVER)................... MAIN ......... .. (DOTSON) .......SAPIEN ....... N (RICHARDSON) .............. + 19" .... (ROBIT ILL,�1 - GREEN ........ (PARKER) ................... NELSON. C .... (AGE) ICT i My41MM1�M.... - . �� IMINER) ....................NELSON, K. - .. ✓ _ t (NORBY) ........ CATLIN ........ (DOWNEY) .................. NEWTON ...... Zz� G. (SCOTT) ......... COLLINS ...... Y (DUNLAP) ....................PARK6R ...... �- w (MAIN) .......... CULVER ....... (HUNTER) ................... PICKLER ...... G� {NELSON, C.) .... DUNLAP ....... _1.0 �j (HART) ............ . ........ PLUMMER ..... I/ (RICE) .......... EVANS ........ (EDGAR) .................... 14OMif18H6 .... _ (MAHONEY) ...... FLORA ........ L---7 (EDGAR) .................... PUCKETT . -... t/ '- (McCLNE) .......GRIFFIN ....... V (GRISET) ................... PW61 ....... (WILSON) ........ LASZLO ........ (PULIDO) ................... RICHARDSON.. �C .- (RICHARDSON)... 10NOYialMi .... (STANTON) ................. ROTH ......... .. LG (MINER) ......... NELSON. K..... ✓ (COX) ...................... SANSONE ..... .jC _ (HUNTER) ....... PICKLER ........ Q a^' (DOTSON) .................. SAPIEN ....... (ROTH) .......... STANTON ..... (HAMMOND) ................. SHERIDAN .... G�. rA- (BATES) ......... SYLVIA ........ ` i (ROTH) ..................... STANTON ..... T (MILLER) .................... SWAN ........ DISTRICT5 `, (JEMPSA) ........... ......... SYLVIA ....... I 1 (HART) .......... PLUMMER ..... L� (FERRYMAWSHERRICKIREADE) . WAHNER ...... tI (STANTON) ...... ROTH ......... ✓ (FRIED) ...................... WEDAA ....... (COX) ...........SANSONE ..... (MOULTON-PATTERSOM ..... WINCHELL L11,STRICT 6 (SHERRICK) ..... WAHNER ...... (STANTON) ...... ROTH ......... �- (PLUMMER) ...... HART ......... y� ? DISTRICT 7 © STAFF OTHERs Y r SYLVESTER ......... ✓ WOODRUFF ... (PUCKETT) ...... EDGAR........ _)� )Iy BROWN ............ r/ ANWAR ....... _ (READE) ........ WAHNER ...... ti/ _� ANDERSON ......... DEMIR ........ _✓ (BEYER) ......... BARRERA ..... V CLAWSON .......... _✓ FLEMING ...... �_ (PLUMMER) ...... K�......... L� --)a [)AWES ............. SC HOHENER ..... _ (PULIDO) ........ RICHARDSON .. ✓ GORCZYCA ......... �C HOUGH ....... (STANTON) ...... ROTH ......... i HASENSTAB ........ _ HOWARD ...... _ (HAMMOND) ..... SHERIDAN ..... GL� �� O�. HODGES ........... HUNT ......... D ISIBICT 11 l:./ KYLE ............... �� KNOPF ........ LINDER ............. _ LEE .......... (MOULTON- NELLOR ............ LINDSTROM .. - PATTERSON) ...... WINCHELL ..... ✓ Y NELSON ........... I LYNCH ........ (SILVA) .......... KELLY ........ C. a, NICHOLS ........... _L� SHAW ........ �C (ROT" STANTON .... - L/ y— -T OOTEN ............. _� STONE ........ _� DISTRICT 13 4.!.& RENESCU .......... _ WASON ....... SIMPSON ........... L% YOUNG ....... ✓✓u� (HUNTER) ....... EHRLE ........ 1-11- ICJ N STREED .....--..... (BEYER) ......... BARRERA ..... VINCENT ........... �/ f (FRIED) ......... GULLIXSON .... ♦r WINSOR ...... (DUNLAP) .......PAR....... L-- (STANTON) ...... ROTH ......... �C MILLER ( ) ..... SWAN .. ..... , (HAMMONDD)) ..... SHERIDAN..... (BEYER) ......... BARRERA ..... Lam"' (EDGAR) ........ P&OF49...... (STANTON) ...... ROTH ......... L� �V'•.�a �'" 1211 1191 PUBLIC SIGN —IN SHEET IF -.YOU WISH -YOUR NAME TO BE REFLECTED IN THE MINUTES, PLEASESiGN iN COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY December It, 1991 BOARD MEETING NAME Please Print ORGANIZATION/FIRM Please Print 4 in5 d i JOINT BOARD MEETING - December 11. 1991 #4 - Receive and file minute excerpts Chairman Mahoney referred to the yellow sheet inside of the Directors' folders. ��•% He indicated that an excerpt for Cypress, District 3, Richard Partin as Active Director and Cecilia Age as Alternate Director, was being added. The Joint Chairman then asked Richard Partin to come forward. He welcomed him back and stated that pins for Directors have been given since Partin was here last. Chairman Mahoney also welcomed Hank Wedaa back and asked him to come forward and receive his pin. #5 - Public Comments The Joint Chairman stated that Darrell Amentz wishes to speak to the Directors on Item #13(b)(2). #6(a) - Joint Chairman's Report The Joint Chairman reported that the Regular Joint Board Meeting for Wednesday, February 12th, is a legal holiday and the following day, Thursday, February 13th, is the League of Cities' meeting date. We are recommending that the Joint Boards declare their intent to conduct the meeting on February 19th. He then asked for a consensus for that date. He then stated the Districts would adjourn the January meeting to February 19 at the usual time. He then stated that the Fiscal Policy Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday, December 18th at 5:30 P.M. #6(b) - General Manager's Report The General Manager reported there were several items later in,the agenda on which Staff will be giving a report and he would hold any comments until then. He also stated he would like to take this opportunity on behalf of the staff to wish all of the Directors a happy holiday season and a happy new year. #6(c) - General Counsel's Report The General Counsel stated the Districts would be convening in closed session later to review two matters of litigation. #13(b)(1) - Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee staff report JWS: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Committee Chairman Cox had asked staff to give a report on this item. He was unexpectedly called out of town today but he did plan on being here. \*01/ -1- REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION AND REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: /a Zi ! 4 I AGENDA ITEM NO. Q 3) (b) (2) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NAME: (PLEASE PRINT) E LL 41 t Eiv T— HOME ADDRESS: F-41,L PLA-GF NUMBER STREET) (CITY/ZIP CODE) TELEPHONE: -7Z2-O'2-1I (l4vMc) 2s`f -Si -77 CL`"''e`c� ) REPRESENTING: C�ETy 6F- Al Pv8Lc.0 v-r7LtrtE-S (SELF OR NAME OF ORGANIZATION) F28A For those of you who have been on the Board for sometime, you will know that water conservation has not traditionally been the role of a wastewater management agency. Heretofore that has pretty much been left to the purview of the water retailers for the most part of which are your cities, or the water wholesalers such as MWD on the regional level and such agencies as Municipal Water Districts of Orange County on the Orange County wholesale scene. However, those of you who have also been on the Board for awhile will recall that our 1989 Master Plan was adopted and took a more holistic view and included a fairly comphrensive and aggressive program of water conservation. The benefits are many of course. Some to the Districts, some to other entities, but certainly all to the public. Up to this point we have kind of been easing our way into water conversation. The Boards have previously four programs. For the most part, we have been doing some small pilot work and directing our attention towards public education and these types of pilot projects with other public and private entities. The proposed Anaheim project is actually the largest one that we've considered to date. It's clear that for projects such as the proposed Anaheim program to be successful, there really needs to be a partnership between MWD, the local water retailer, be it a city or in some cases a special district, a water district and the Sanitation Districts. It is also clear that for the Sanitation Districts, at least to realize the payback, there have to be many of these projects that are undertaken so that we can realize enough savings to avoid an increment of wastewater treatment facilities construction. Unfortunately right now, because of the economic consideration and budgetary considerations of just about every public agency, a commitment on a long-term basis is somewhat in question. I would like to ask the Manager of our Water Conservation, Water Reclamation and Sludge Recycling program to present the staff report and committee recommendations that are before you. `...� CHARLES NICHOLS (CN): Thank you, Wayne and Mr. Chairman, ladies and gentlemen. I have a brief presentation that I will use some slides to highlight the nature of the program. The program before you tonight is a consideration of the Anaheim pilot project for developing ultra low -flush toilet and low -flow showerhead retrofits in the City of Anaheim. My presentation will briefly go over an overview of what the nature of the project is, the objectives to be accomplished by the project, review the cost and benefits and make some comparisons therefore; and then summarize for you the committee recommendations that have been set forth. In an overview, the nature of this pilot project is to provide financial incentives to residential customers and hotel/motel owners, the objective being to accomplish retrofits of up to 4,000 residences and as many as 1,000 hotel/motel rooms, and focusing in the City of Anaheim area. This would be the first ULF toilet retrofit proposal of any magnitude in Orange County. As a part of the project it would provide an opportunity to gather information on the Orange County customer acceptance of the toilet retrofitting process. As Wayne mentioned, this is very much a cost -sharing program. There is a partnership and here you can see, in this particular case where this project, there are two elements described for you in the package. There is a residential portion and there is a hotel/motel portion. In the case of the residential portion of which has a total project cost of about $950,000, the Sanitation Districts portion would be about 28% as shown in the orange part of the pie. Anaheim would have about 28% and MWD would fund about 44%. For the hotel/motel part, that changes a little bit. The Districts portion would be 34%, Anaheim is 11�1� -2- 34% and MWD is about 32%. Those percentages change a little bit in that they reflect the different amounts of water saved for the two types of projects. MWD pegs its water savings contributions to the amount of water saved. So, in the hotel/motel there is a little bit less savings and, therefore, their percentage share tends to go down a little bit. `..r� Real quickly, the objective of the pilot project before you is to obtain about 4,000 residences retrofitting process. I won't belabor the numbers and go through all of these. The point of this slide is to indicate to you that there is water savings that is likely and is going to occur. There is no question about that. In the case of toilets, there will be about 29.4 gallons saved per toilet per day, while in showers it will be about 20 gallons saved per shower per day. That would result, in the case of the 4,000 residences in the City of Anaheim and over the course of a year, about .28 mgd or 280,000 gallons per day savings. In the case of the hotel/motel part of the pilot project, the gallons saved in toilets would be a little bit different, about 22.5 gallons saved, while in the showers it would be roughly the same set of numbers. Because it is a smaller total set of rooms or water closet you might say, the hotel/motel flow reduction is about .032 mgd or 32,000 gallons per day. You add those two numbers up and, it may be a little difficult to read but, at the bottom the total flow reduction for the combined projects would be about .31 or 310,000 gallons per day. Now to move on to a quick summary of the cost perspective that the project has associated with it, and this is a little bit more elaboration on the percent share of pie charts that I showed you before. What we have here is the three columns of the Districts' share in the middle, the MWD and Anaheim share on the far right-hand side the total project cost. We have three lines. The top two lines are the residential toilet and showerhead portions, the middle line is the hotel/motel portions and then the bottom is the totals. We draw out of this that the Districts' share of cost for the residential part of the toilet and showerheads will be about $270,000, while the hotel/motel part will be a little over $45,000, for a total of a little over $315,000. The total project cost in the lower right-hand corner is a little over $1 million. To look at that on a unit cost basis so that we can perhaps compare this in a little bit in a couple of slides later on a toilet -to -toilet or showerhead-to-showerhead basis, this slide presents the similar kind of information but it's a dollars per toilet and showerhead. In this case for the Districts' share you see that we are right about, for the residential part of it, $40.00 per toilet and showerhead, while on the hotel/motel part we are right around $45.00. On the far right, the total project unit cost ranging from $140 per toilet and showerhead down to $133. Now to move into the benefit part and, this is.now on the downhill side of this brief presentation for you, the benefits to the Districts and, by the way, these benefits that I'm summarizing here for you are just the Districts' benefits. As Wayne alluded to, there are savings that accrue to the water utility and MWD and we are not presenting any of those savings to you. We can provide those to you, but I don't want to confuse any of the numbers for you. This is just the Districts' portion of the benefits. Those that have accrued to the Districts in savings over time, and at least over a 10-year period, perhaps longer, and they are due to capital offsets that can come about, as well as 0&M (operations and maintenance) reductions. 1\� -3- Now before going into what the particulars of the 0&M benefits are, I wanted to clarify, as Wayne pointed out, the capital savings for this particular project may not be self evident, or they may not be commitments that we can actually get right away. The Districts need to realize a total savings of about 6 mgd, as noted on the slide. That 6 mgd is related to increments of treatment modules that we build, like a primary clarifier we build in 6 mgd size capacity. So, to reach that 6 mgd, a firm and reliable savings, we need to retrofit in the Districts' service area about 10% of the equivalent dwelling units, or a total of about 80,000 dwelling units. This Anaheim project by comparison handles about 4,000 of those dwelling units. Now, just as a point of reference, in order to get to the 6 mgd savings and the 80,000 dwelling units, the Districts would, at some point, need to commit a little over $6 million to support the retrofit project. The cities, themselves, would need to commit a little over $6 million and MWD, in this particular model using these percentages, would need to commit up to as much as $10 million. For the Districts the benefit realized would be over $12 million. So, from our perspective alone we would be able look at a $6 million investment with a $12 million savings, but that is an eventuality. I'll have some comments on the feasibility of that as we end up. If you look specifically at this project and the savings of this particular pilot project, the 0&M savings, which is what this slide focuses on, come about as we are able to avoid pumping the flow that is not put into the sewer, and we have associated with that variable costs of energy, chemical and other things that accrue to us at about $236 per million gallons of flow. In this chart we see for toilets and showerheads a total savings and then a unit savings that would accure to us. This accrual on a total savings for toilets of $137,000 and for showerheads $35,000, is something that accumulates over a 10-year period or so. You can see that on the bottom line that nets out to be about $22 per toilet and showerhead. Now to take the other part of the equation which is the capital offsets that accrue to the Districts, that happens at about $1.43 per gallon saved per day. You can see the numbers here for toilets and showerheads total up to just shy of $450,000. To get a comparison, then, for the Sanitation Districts' case, the capital savings to Operations and Maintenance savings ratio is a little more than 3:1, closer to 4:1. On a unit basis we find that capital amounts to about $57 saved per toilet and showerhead. Now let's bring this into closure and focus with the cost effectiveness comparison. On the top line of that particular slide is the Districts' costs for this pilot project. That totals about $315,000 for the two parts, the residential and the hotel/motel part at a cost of about $40.00 per toilet and showerhead, and that's a combined cost, sort of a weighted average cost. There you see the Districts' benefits provided in the sense of the 0&M savings and the capital savings. Now at this point there are, perhaps, some options before you to consider. I would like to take a second and explain what the financial exposure or monetary exposure might be in doing different options. For example if the Districts decided to proceed with the total package of doing this Anaheim project but not proceed with other projects after this, then the financial risk might be the difference between the $315,000 and just the 0&M savings, or the $172,000, because we wouldn't necessarily be able to realize that capital savings over the long term. That difference is about $143,000. If, on the other hand, the Board were to proceed with the amendment as proposed in the agenda package before you, and that's to go ahead with the hotel/motel part, then if we were to then not proceed with any other projects after that, the financial exposure would be about $29,000. That would be potentially lost from not being able to approve the capital savings. \ate -4- So, in conclusion, the committee recommendations before you are several. The first was to determine the interest of other cities in the feasibility of getting to this 10% participation, the 80,000 equivalent dwelling units, in order to certify or get quite reliable information on how to get the 6 mgd of flow savings. That's one of the important factors. �..� Another factor that relates to this is where MWD is in terms of its, funding status as a joint partner. As we had eluded to earlier, there is this three way partnership that is very, very important. To give you a little bit of an update on where that stands, it's not necessarily great news. At the moment MWD is in its own throes of budget making and rate setting. It stands right now that the Board -approved funds for conservation approved current projects and proposals such as this Anaheim project, but there are no funds at the moment in MWD's budget for projects beyond where we are at right now. So I eluded to eariler, if the Districts wanted to proceed over time, we might need to have $10 million of MWD commitment. That doesn't exist right now. I think, though, that we might see some commitments. I'm positive and optimistic myself, personally, on where MWD will evolve with its budget. They are on the same kind of budget cycle as this Board is here. I suspect by this spring time we will see a much greater clarification of where they are and probably some funds for more projects in the future. That kind of for me naturally segues into the next item, Item No. 2, which is to hold in abeyance a recommendation on the residential part of this proposed pilot project with Anaheim until some of these feasibility assessments can be made. The 10% participation by the cities and the service area and where MWD stands with its budget. And that then leads to the final recommendation from the committee to the Board, and that is to amend Phase II of the conservation program in order to incorporate the proposed 1,000 room hotel/motel portion of the program at a cost to the Districts of a little over $45,000. That completes my report, Mr. Chairman. JC: Are there any questions for staff? CULVER: I have a couple of questions. Turn to page 7 on this staff report of the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee. Some of the figures here kind of blow my mind. I don't understand them. First off, this 6 mgd. Is that for one year, ten years, how many years? CNN: The 6 mgd is not necessarily tied to a particular time. It's can we accumulate 6 mgd of savings in several years and then we can not build a primary clarifier. So, if we can do that over the course of several years, then we can plan on taking one of those off-line. CULVER: Okay. Can you answer on the third line down, CSDOC's cost of $54.4 million? What does that mean? CNN: Well, we had been asked at the previous committee meeting to try to evaluate, given this Anaheim model, what would be the cost to the Districts and the savings to the Districts if we were to do this 100% all throughout the Districts. I've given you some numbers on the 10% so, if we were to go into every residence, over 800,000 equivalent dwelling units in the Districts, this is the kind of numbers that we would be faced with, this $57 million. So, I've taken basically the Anaheim model and proportioned them upwards for the total number of dwelling units in our service area. 1411� -5- CULVER: Is this true that as I read this, that one million mgd is almost CNN: Close, right. That's about right. CULVER: Well, this $6 million or 6 mgd is to be achieved in how many years? CNN: It depends upon what pace we're able to convince either ourselves or the cities that we are working with to go forward with these kinds of projects. My best judgement would say that if we were to proceed at a fairly rapid pace, I think we could implement enough of these projects in about three years or four years, and that's assuming that MWD is there in its partnership. RICHARDSON: What type of savings are customers such as hotels and motels going to receive on this? CNN: Well, that is, and I'm not an expert in that, it's roughly a ratio of about for every gallon of water saved and the cost of that, it's about $.20 on the dollar for the Sanitation Districts and close to $.80 on the dollar for the water retailer's side of it. So the consumer or the city will see something like that and that's based upon some numbers that we've run that looks at water rates at about $.80 per 100 cubic feet. RICHARDSON: So, if I own a hotel or what can I expect as far as my water bill? What's the economic value for me in doing this because is ... The reason I'm asking this question is because I see this described as an incentive. But I don't see that the hotels are participating in this either using any of their capital. We're the ones that are putting the money forward and the hotels are going to realize a windfall financially. At least some of them are. CNN: They are likely to. They will have a reduced water bill. There is no question about that. I think I would turn that into a perspective that it's important for us to add those folks on a large scale as part of the funding team, and make it not necessarily a three-way partnership but a four-way partnership. As a reference point on these 1,000 rooms, these rooms are about 6% of the total hotel/motel rooms in the City of Anaheim. There are a little over 18,000 rooms as it turns out. So it acts as a pilot project to see how that might act as an incentive for those hotel/motel folks as well. So, it's certainly not all of the hotel/motels in the City of Anaheim.: RICHARDSON: Oh, no. I'm just trying to see what the value is if I'm a hotel owner where a different approach might be tried to get them to put some of the dollars up in terms of realizing a gain from year-to-year by participating. CNN: I certainly would advocate that, as well. RICHARDSON: I think that seems to be a sound way to go because we're not going to put the public dollars in to give somebody else a windfall even if it's the right thing to do. In the report here it mentions a factor of 2.7 people per household. Is that for all districts or just for this area where the project will be? CNN: That happens to be a number from the Bureau of Census or the census information. So, it is taken over the whole Districts' service area. It's averaged over the whole Districts' service area. We weren't able to necessarily find that type of for the study or fine-tune numbers for individual city units or census direct units or anything like that. -6- RICHARDSON: I just want to make a statement. In our own city in Santa Ana we have 3.9 people per household. in terms of changing demographics and the number of people per household. It seems to me that to base the savings of cost avoidance due to capital, operations and maintenance using that 2.7 number, that any savings you might have are going to be erased because you're going to have more folks living in houses. It seems to me that some of the savings are more theoretical and, while we may make the adjustment with good intentions here, we may find out that we're going to have to go ahead and make that adjustment anyhow. So I'm not sure that those ought to be counted as savings. And then the only other thing I have to say is the MWD, it just seems to me that this is a very curious situation where they're willing to give us money to save water and, at the same time, be facing the potential of asking water retailers to pay more money because of we are all doing such a good job of saving money and they are I'm not saying this is a bad idea. I just think that maybe this is more approprate for the water retailers and folks are going to this project, I don't know. I'm just not seeing that there is enough savings here even with these big numbers that Norm mentioned. There's only a spread of about $4-5 million in this 10-year deal. We could all be erased by votes I'm just not convinced from the staff report that there is enought to do that. There's just not enought there to tie it all together. JC: Director Sansone, then Director Roth and then Director Swan. SANSONE: Last week at a meeting with the South Coast Water District . To get back on their long-range planning for storage they would need a price increase of $175.00 per acreage foot. $45 to $47 maximum and they would go. I don't know if Charles, have you had a chance to talk with them and see what they have agreed on? CNN: No. I don't believe they have yet agreed on anything. SWAN: They have agreed to study the hotel project in Anaheim. CNN: The Metropolitan Water District has definitely not agreed in any sense to fund the amount of money, the $10 million, that I referred to to take this to a 6 mgd savings. There are preliminary discussions that we've had with MWD's staff that might present optimism, but the Board of Directors of MWD has not made any commitments. I want to make that very clear concerning this $10 million or getting this 6 mgd of savings. SANSONE: less water we take from. This is a ten year plan. This is the part they do not have any money for this. The cost of water as it is delivered today . Without the price increases that I mentioned, there will be no funds available. ROTH: To speed up the process, since we do have a specialist from the water department of the City of Anaheim,.I'd like to hear what his feeling is to speed up this conversation and also focus. 'Is that possible? JC: Well, let's see. How about Peer and Bob, is it okay, can we go ahead and have him speak now because I do want to get him in as well. Alright. Mr. Ament, would you like to come up at this time. Generally, we allow give minut4es for those to speak on"any matter and we'd like to have you come up here in the front if you would, please. `.. Following his presentation, you certainly can ask questions of him as well. 7FA AMENT: If you will bear with me, I don't have slides. I wanted to address a couple of the questions, if I could, that were raised. I thought just quickly what I would do is talk a little bit about the planning process in Anaheim. I realize that we're one of many cities and why we have evolved to where we have in looking to develop an ultra -low flush toilet �✓ program, why it makes economic sense to us. I just want to put a couple of numbers on the board. Before I do that this young lady here is Atossa Soltani who, if there are some technical questions, she can answer them better than I can in terms of ultra -low flush toilets. She's had considerable experience in that area and she heads up our water conservation program. If you can hear me, when we got through the planning process in Anaheim, what we're doing is what any utility does. We're looking at . We forecast what our growth might be. That is common for any utility. What we're attempting to do in Anaheim is as we grow, not in the future, just as MWD and some of the board members here saw in a committee meeting by SCWD, they are looking at a substantial portion of their future in terms of conservation because it makes economic sense to do that. And, we are doing the same thing. We're looking at a variety of programs. One program we are looking at is the ultra -low flush toilet program because if you look at residential usage, 50% of residential inside the home is the toilet. If we can reduce that, that's a substantial impact on our residential usage. So if you look at the curve over a period of time over a year, what you'll see is starting January, you'll see the curve something like that and that's the summer peak, which is basically landscaping. So, we have some programs in Anaheim that we're trying to work and get much more efficient landscaping in place. When we look inside the home, roughly about 50% of that is coming from the utilization of toilets. The question we ask ourselves in residential is how do we address that? We also have in Anaheim, as do many of the cities with a lot of tourism business, a lot of tourists that visit. And we asked how are we going to reach the tourists because they don't care. They come from areas, many of them, where they have plenty of water and they may not be concerned with how many times they flush a toilet. This is why we've thought toilet program which you are considering tonight. When we look at our programs, we're doing, the gentleman asked from Santa Ana, when we look at our cost of water, we said to ourselves what is our cheapest water supply? We buy our water from MWD. It's about $260/acre foot. If it jumps $45 to $170, it's going to be a lot more. We also in Anaheim have a lot of wells. That's about, we add our capital costs, debt amortization for our wells, it's about $160/acre foot by the time we add our operating and capital costs. If you assume a 10-year life of a toilet, which is probably pretty conservative, it will cost us about $90.00/acre foot. That is our cheapest water supply source. So it makes it common sense for us. And, I think it will with the rest of the cities whose engineering staffs are looking at this. This is a relative magnitude so it makes real economic sense for us just as it does the Districts if you can avoid adding the clarifier beyond range. So this is the approach we've taken in Anaheim in determining what conservation programs . Conservation to us can sometimes be characterized as a positive program where it's not economic, you may be giving money away. But the way we see it, particularly with the low -flush toilet, it makes alot of economic sense. It's our cheapest water supply. -8- The question that you raised regarding hotel/motels, we did do a program with Disneyland. The District put up $10,000, MWB $10,000 and the city $10,000. They've taken one of their towers with 300 rooms and we're matching that against one where they haven't retrofitted. This put up about $200 per toilet, and we put up about $100. We would expect with the hotel/motel industry, since they are a private industry, we would look for some matching dollars. We aren't going out there just to subsidize them and give them a free ride. The residential we are looking at probably, we wouldn't be paying the full amount but $75 to $100 for an ultra -low flush and probably by the time you install it, you're talking somewhere in the range of $160.00. So there are going to be some costs to the consumer, as well as to the private enterprise. Just to summarize that, from Anaheim's perspective it makes sense. Atossi just came back from Sacramento where she was a participant in the signing ceremony on the best management practices. Some of you, if your council membership adopted that, know that there are 16 points in that plan. The idea of that is to show good faith throughout the state, that we are looking at ways to conserve water and one of the 16 items that we have pledged to do are to look at replacing toilets within residences. This is why we have presented to our city council and they have supported the program and start-up in Anaheim. We recognize that it is a difficult economic time, but the economics to us is that it saves us money and ultimately will save our consumers money in the long term and makes good economic sense. It has some side benefits, too, in that we are at the same time taking dollars that we might later be drilling wells and doing other things and we're putting them into the pocket of our consumers and giving them the discretionary power to spend it in this particular case on a toilet, which then helps the local economy in terms of a multiplier effect that we feel amounts to potentially several million dollars when you look at the million dollar expenditure. Unless there are any questions, that's quickly my five minutes, I guess and ends my time. We thank you for reconsidering this and hope that you will adopt it. EVANS: Did you ever consider using the fluid master in regular toilets? AMENT: I'm going to ask Atossi to address that. She may be able to answer that. She's been involved in this program and can give you some technical reasons why we feel the toilet replacement is the better approach. ATOSSA SOLTANI (AS): In addressing your question, the fluid master does take an older five to seven gallon toilet and reduce it to approximately 311 gallons without pushing performance to its limits, so to speak. It i.s a project that would be labor intensive. It was felt that replacing older toilets with 1.6 gallons assures that the toilet is designed to perform with less water. It is a more permanent fixture and it does save a tremendous amount of more water than the fluid master, which would result in a couple of gallons savings rather than closer to 1i to 4 gallons savings per flush. That's the answer for that. WANNER: What about these that cost about 100? AS: There has been a study done by the Metropolitan Water District that over the last several years, I've seen close to 100 different toilet alternative flushing devices developed on the market. The study is out on that and we're waiting for them to actually release the study, but the majority of those require quite a bit of sophistication on the part of the customer to install it, that is one of the things. Second of all, most of these devices have a limited life. They last maybe at the most somewhere between six months to two years. They will fail eventually. So it was felt, and occasionally some of them interefere with the performance of the toilet. Many engineering reports do indicate that by just reducing the volume of the tank, you do not increase, you do not get the same type of performance. Ulta-low flush toilets, on the other hand, were designed with a certain bowl design and the actual size of the trap and the whole shape of the trap to evacuate the waste with 1.6 gallons. It wasn't just the reduction in the tank that makes them work. It was the whole design of the mechanisms and the shape of.the fixture. So in some point maybe there are products out there that we could rely on. However, one of the things I like to stress is being a Program Manager, once you get a customer to participate, you would like to make a long, lasting impact. They're willing, they're going to participate, you might as well go for the 10-20 year impact rather than the few year impact, because if you do alternative flushing devices, all you're doing is having to do the same programs every few years because you have to repeat these programs in order for the savings to last. JC: Further questions? Go ahead Jim, and then Bob. EVANS: How practical do you think it is to put these water saving showerheads in? Now I know I have some at my house and,my family complains. AMENT: I can only speak from my personal experience. I put them in and'we like them, so I guess it's personal preference. One thing we shouldn't lose sight of is that when we're dealing with the consumer, and the study that we did internally, and we're talking about showerheads, certainly there is a water savings; in terms of supply, benefit to the consumer. There's a savings to the sewer district and the consumer, depending on whether they heat their water by electricity or natural gas. We look at natural gas, there is a several hundred dollar savings over a year to the consumer with the low -flow showerheads so from the consumer standpoint,'there is a considerable economic benefit to them with the low -flow showerheads. We have distributed approximately 40,000 kits. In the surveys we've done and the feedback we've had, generally there's been satisfaction with the kits. We've tried with MWD to provide quality kits. They're not the Shower -Pic Massage, but you can't get those in low -flow. That is not what we distributed, but our feedback has been positive. BELL: I don't have any questions for these folks, but I would like to make a comment. I'm opposed to the subsidy aspects of this saving of water I'm very much concerned about that. I'm also concerned about the senate bill that is pending regarding the requirement from all these units/toilets that have to be retrofitted or replaced by a certain date. I think that's contrary to private enterprise concept that we're all here for and I oppose it. I'm not opposed to the idea. The idea is fine, but it is worded, I think we need to strongly encourage private enterprise to replace these units. I don't think we should be in business doing this ourselves. JC: Are there any further questions? There is nothing on the floor. We'll go with Buck, and then Peer. CATLIN: On the staff report, Exhibit 3. My question is you have down that there is .31 mgd per day in savings. That's for the Anaheim project? I tried figuring this twice, but that comes out to be an annual savings of 310 acre feet of water. 310 acre feet of water actually saved. Is that what we are talking about, conservation? .31 mgd at 365 days per year.... 1*� -10- CNN: That's right. CATLIN: So really this is not a conservation issue. CNN: No CATLIN: So aside from the compilation, this is just a drop in the bucket. SWAN: We in both water and sewer district . I've got to tell you that if you can go into a program and you avoid costs by doing it as something that is going to make this county more water independent long term, less dependent on imported water, state's doing a crummy job of buying and supplying, then we're better off. expect to get some benefit in the area on pilot programs like this. I sit on the sub -committee that reviews this and we said, because we think that there needs to be some additional prioritization and all of the costs are allocated by through the District. The hotel thing, we're talking about $25,000. I mean, the consent calendar today had so many things in here that were more than $25,000, and we breezed right through it. This is a reasonably small deal and the City is offering to . You're not going to lose money on this. Those things that hold up the rest of the project This project is way downstream. Go with it. The only thing that gives me pause is two comments that Bob made over here. And, I'm sorry for here, Bob, is (1) you put water -saving devices in any kind of house and then the people , everytime they go, the more times they go to the toilet, the more you're going to save. The more showers, the more people you have in the house that is retrofitted, the more you are going to save. I want to reiterate what Phil said. The MWD rate increase is widely misunderstood by people. This is based on capital needs, not because they in the drought because they had a $400 million reserve fund to absorb the drought shortage. . I move the question JC: Alright, we're going to move the question and I need a motion SWAN: I'll make the motion that we approve the $45,000 JC: We have a motion. I need a second. DIRECTOR: Roll call JC: Discussion RICHARDSON: With the comments that were made I appreciate those fully. I just want to reiterate again that I hope we're looking at these things and really go through the diligent analysis of using the gross factor or a rate of occupancy per house across the Districts and use that as a way to gauge savings. I'm not sure that that is the whole picture. I would be willing to support the motion if the maker would be willing to add an amendment to it to make it subject to our staff and city staff coming back with an appropriate recommendation of a contribution made by the hotels that would benefit from reduced water rates. JC: We have a motion and a second. SWAN: RICHARDSON: staff would you consider an amendment to have them come back and tell us they're putting a little in? I would prefer to that now. -11- SWAN: increase in bed tax in Anaheim, they're probably doing it already. JC: Alright, let's .... We've got more discussion. Director Collins and then Director Culver. \Imvl COLLINS: Mr. Joint Chairman, I would like to have some clarification. Perhaps I don't understand the maker of the motion. As I understand the motion, we are saying spend $45,000 to target the pilot program, but do not allocate any funds further than that $45,000. Anything over $45,000 to be spent another presentation and another vote would be submitted by the committee. SWAN: The intent of the motion is only to spend the $45,000 and to send it back and have a little more work done on this before we go any further, having the allocation of payment, reviewing some of the problems that Bob brought up and looking at tight • COLLINS: No further money beyond $45,000 JC: There's nothing more than that that's been the motion. Director Culver? CULVER: Mr. Chairman, I'm reading here Water Conservation Phase II, Hotel Motel Showerhead Retrofit in Anaheim. Item No. 2, select lighting consultant and lighting contractor. Now, how are did we get a lighting contractor in here? You start making studies of things and pretty soon JC: Let's have Charles respond. CNN: I hear you. The consideration that you have before you is to not buy into those parts of the electrification program the City of Anaheim is working on. It is focused very narrowly on the water conservation part only. We provided the Appendix A, which is the City of Anaheim's staff report, which explains to you the nature of the City's project for your benefit. It doesn't imply in your vote and consideration of this, it doesn't imply to buy into those parts of that project. SWAN: May I speak to the maker of the motion here. We've got several grants that we are under an obligation to go into water conservation. . In order to satisfy grant requirements, . So if something that we are obligated to go and do as a part of getting grants, this is only $45,000. The City of Anaheim has gone way down That's the whole intent of the JC: Director Catlin, and then we'll go to Director Griset, and then we're about ready to vote unless..... CATLIN: I made my comments on that. I was going to say that conservation , but we do have certain obligations to meet I'm going to vote for the measure because I think it's in principle what we should be doing step-by-step process and I think it's the right way to go. JC: Alright, Director Griset? GRISET: I would like to make an amendment to the motion which would simply provide that a reasonable contribution from the hotels/motels' beneficiary -12- JC: We have a motion. Do we have a second for a substitute motion? GRISET: It's not a substitute. It's an amendment to . JC: Is the maker going to amend the motion then? Alright.... call for the question on the amendment. Do we have a second? We've got a second on the �..►� amendment. Alright, sorry about that. Alright, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed? (Several noes) Alright, let's have a roll call. DUNLAP: Please clarify on what it is we are voting on at this moment. JC: Mr. Griset, please restate your amended motion. DUNLAP: Well, that's fine. We are voting only on the amended motion. JC: That is it. It's the amended motion. The amendment to the motion, excuse me. Alright, the amendment to the motion fails. We'll go back to the motion. ?: Call for the question. CULVER: Mr. Chairman. . . JC: All in favor signify. . .I've got a call for the question. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed? (several noes) Alright, roll call. Alright, the motion fails, three to five with one no decision. So, we will. . .yes, Mr. Culver? CULVER: Yes. Could I ask a question? I think I understood Mr. Griset's motion. voted no. He didn't want any participation with hotels JC: That's correct. \✓ SWAN: No. JC: Huh? Your motion failed. And and the amendment failed. So there is nothing right now. CULVER: I just wondered what Mr. Griset's motion was. I just want people to know that Mr. Griset that I feel that if you're going to go into this program, that everybody should take part. I think JC: That was part of his motion and it was voted down. #15 - Staff Report re Ordinances JWS: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. As the Directors know from our previous discussions with you, our source control program is really the cornerstone of our entire wastewater management program. Notwithstanding the success of our program, the EPA has several changes that they would like to make to our source control ordinance. I would like to ask our Source Control Manager, Margaret Nellor, to give you a brief staff report of what is recommended and is Agenda Item Nos. 16 and 17. MARGIE NELLOR (MN): Mr. Chairman,_ladies and gentlemen, it's a pleasure to be here tonight. There are two ordinances that are being presented for your attention. ./ -13- The first is, as Wayne mentioned, a revised version of our wastewater discharge regulations. These incorporate recent EPA regulations and recommendations as well as recent changes to state law, which occurred this October. The second ordinance is a fee ordinance, which is compilation of all the various fees and charges that are important for the administration of our source control program, as well as the wastewater discharge regulation ordinance. Very briefly I have some slides, if I can get them to operate. Please don't be alarmed by this slide. I am not going through the long detailed history of the ordinances, but the importance of it is that we enacted our first ordinance in 1954 to control discharges to the sewer system. The last revisions, which were quite extensive, occurred in September of 1989. Now the revisions before you tonight aren't nearly as extensive, but they are very, very important. They basically include these five areas. The revisions include revised definitions for our Class I User and significant non-compliance terms, and these are being done in accordance with recent EPA regulations which were promulgated last year. There are also revised definitions for major violations and minor violations. These are being made in accordance with recommendations from EPA that we base these kinds of violations not only on violations of mass emission limits, but also concentration limits. The third changes that are significant are that we are deleting the terms "batch dump" and we are deleting "batch -dump non-compliance fees". Our existing permit authority and enforcement authority is sufficient for us to regulate and control these kinds of discharges as well as some new authority that we have now as civil penalties, which I'll discuss in a minute which will give us the ability to fine significantly for people that dump into our system. We are also adding new non-compliance sampling fees. These are replacing the old non-compliance fees. The new fees are being incorporated on advice of Legal Counsel. They �1 will recover our cost of going back out and resampling a non -compliant industry. So, they recover our administrative costs, our field costs, as well as our laboratory costs. The old fees, which were based on each pound over a limit, did not in all cases recover our costs, and in many instances were not significant enough to be a deterrent. The new fees will take care of that problem, and will be a deterrent and will bring companies into compliance. Finally, we added language into the ordinance based on recent changes to the law. In October of this year the Governor signed into law Senate Bill 1024, which was authored by Senator David Roberti. This law gives us the authority to seek civil liabilities up to $25,000 per violation per day. Our previous authority was $6,000. We also now for the very first time have the authority to levy administrative fines. We can fine somebody up to $2,000 per day for non -submittal of information, up to $3,000 per day for failure to comply with the compliance schedule, up to $5,000 per violation per day for a discharge violation and up to $10 per gallon for discharging a prohibitive substance. It's this last kind of fine which can be used for batch dumps. The other ordinance before you is the fee ordinance. This is also being put together at the recommendation of Legal Counsel that these fees be enacted and adopted by ordinance. The permit fees, wastehauler fees, administrative fees and filing fees are existing fees. They were adopted by different Board resolutions. Added to that are the new non-compliance sampling fees, which for a major violation are $455 plus laboratory costs. These laboratory costs are detailed in the Ordinance. For a minor violation it's $200 plus laboratory costs. -14- The revision process to the ordinance began this spring and culminated in a July 15th mailing to our Industrial Ad Hoc Committee. This is a group of industry representatives who serve on an advisory basis for our source control policies and procedures. On July 25th we had a meeting of the Committee. Unfortunately, there were only four members present. On July 30th we mailed the revisions to the ordinance to all of our permit holders, and then on August 8th `..✓ we had a public meeting. This was also very lightly attended. We only had three representatives from the public and two were from the same industry. On August 8th after the public meeting we were receiving written comments. We only received comments from three industries. Our public review period ended on the 15th. The comments we received dealt mainly with clarification of EPA regulations. Some of them dealt with sampling procedures. Many of the comments were valuable and were used to revise the ordinance language. Our present proposed schedule for adoption is that the ordinance be introduced and have its first reading tonight before you and then, at the January 8th board meeting, it would have its second reading. There would also be a public hearing and then it would be adopted. Thirty days after the date of adoption it would go into effect, so its effective date would be February 7, 1992. Mr. Chairman, that ends my report. JC: Thank you. Any questions? Yes, Director Roth? ROTH: I would like to have a clarification, really a verification, on Attachment 2, next to the last column. It says District costs 71% overhead. What does that 71% overhead represent? Attachment 2 next to the last column where it says Districts' cost, 71% overhead. JWS: I guess our Director of Finance stepped out of the room but. . .there he is. Gary? GGS: I have to tell you, I couldn't hear the question Director Roth ROTH: First page of attachment . . . help GGS: It's about 30% of salary and related benefits, vacation, sick leave, that sort of stuff and the rest of it is administrative overhead. ROTH: Wait a minute, now, I'm talking about Districts' cost. It is a plus sign. 71% overhead. Now you are attaching 71% overhead in regard to GGS: It should be attached to the labor costs that are in the preceeding columns. It is average hourly rate, 11.45 times the hours two columns over, and one-half an hour at 11.45 is 5.73. 5.73 plus 71% overhead equals $9.80. ROTH: So the overhead is added to those figures or come together 71% of those GGS: The column is Districts' cost plus 71% overhead includes the costs and the overhead. ROTH: It doesn't make sense. . . . . GGS: 5.73 plus 71% is $9.80. 1_� -15- ROTH: That's a pretty high overhead? GGS: Actually, it's pretty low from industry standards. ROTH: Alright. JC: Any other questions? Alright, General Counsel? TLW: I really have nothing. I'll respond to any questions. I think Ms. Nellor really outlined everything about it and the written report is out -tapped (?). It gives the history and the procedural aspects of it. As she indicated, this is the first reading for introduction that will be considered again at the next regular board meeting, January 8th. If there are any questions on the procedure, the substance, one of us will answer them. JC: Wayne, do you have anything further to add? JWS: Nothing from staff, Mr. Chairman. JC: Alright, I need a motion for #15(b), receive and file. Second? Any opposition. Seeing none, we will move on. #18 - Staff report re Job No. J-19-2 JWS: Mr. Chairman, the staff report will be given by Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering. TMD: Mr. Chairman and members of the Boards of Directors, tonight we are asking you to consider approval of a change order to our Central Generation project at the Huntington Beach plant. The central generation project, as you will recall, is a project which will utilize our digester gas, which is a by-product of our sewage treatment, as fuel in large internal combustion engines which will drive generators and produce power. Once this project is completed and it's expected for the early spring or summer of 1992. . . . JC: Take the rest of the year off. All Districts will be excused except Districts 1 and 2. If you can clear out, please,,so we can get rid of 1 and 2's business, I would appreciate it and so would they. Thank you. Alright, if we could move along then with Item #35, Districts 1 & 2, please. #35 - Districts 1 & 2 EIR JWS: Mr. Chairman, the Director of Engineering, Tom Dawes, will give the staff report on Item #35. TMD: Mr. Chairman and members of the Boards of Directors, you have previously acted on. this project which is a joint project to build a sewer in joint with the City of Santa Ana, City of Orange and cost sharing between both Districts 1 and 2. At the last meeting you accepted the draft EIR, authorized staff to circulate it and you set tonight as the time and place for the public hearing to receive both oral and written comments on that draft EIR. \11. -16- To date, we have circulated comments, the draft EIR to all public agencies and people with any interest in the project, and we have received but one written reply and it was a regulatory type response on the Santa Ana River. This draft EIR is getting absolutely no interest and because of the late hour I would recommend that you direct the consultant to complete a final EIR, the comment period gets closed, and that is December 31st. That completes my report, Mr. Chairman. JC: Thank you, Tom. First off, if I may, I need to open the public hearing. I will declare the public hearing now open. I will need a motion to receive and file comments. Do we have any opposition? Seeing none, it's approved. I will ask if there are any persons in the audience wishing to address the Board of Directors on this matter. Seeing none, I will deem the public hearing closed and ask for action. Now you move it, fellows. Is there any discussion? Any opposition? Seeing none, it will be deemed approved. Thank you and again, Happy Holiday to you. You're adjourned. #18 - Job No. J-19-2/Change Order No. 8 TMD: and they are begging off on that. It's a terrible mistake and in terms of that and the late delivery, . We paid for the compressors. We received the compressors and they are installed. We had a plan where we were going to take out two of the old compressors, put in one new compressor. They were so much bigger, we had to take out three compressors of the old ones, install one temporarily on the outside. Once this problem started, it simply compounded and compounded and compounded. And, as I mentioned earlier, it was on the critical job path for this contract. This contract is an early completion contract with a large bonus/penalty attached to it. We want this job done very fast so that we can start producing power since we'll be able to save so much money once it's completed. There was a second problem in the contract. It's our electrical equipment. This problem centered around two things. First of all, we were very concerned about some of the equipment that was furnished as to the quality and to its manufacturer, and we believe we put an inordinate amount of time in checking this for compliance with our plans and specifications. Added to that were several changes that our designers recommended after the job was started. Those changes had to do with recommendations the designers received from Edison. This is quite a complicated project. This generation project will operate in parallel with Edison, and Edison put out certain requirements after the job was awarded. There were other requirements that our designer simply recommended that we do. Overall, this is a smaller problem and this was the big problem. In March the Directors approved Change Order No. 4. We tried to bring everything together in Change Order No. 4. We had assurances from the manufacturer of the compressors that we would, in fact, receive the compressors by March 18th. And so we put in the change order that the contractor acknowledged late delivery and would incur no job costs after the time of delivery by May 15th. We gave ourselves a little factor of savings there. And with that we agreed to accept the electrical equipment that was proposed as part of that that we would not charge them for any extra costs for design and review. Those were proposed no -cost changes and we thought we could put it to rest. However, the first compressor was not delivered complete until the middle of August. So the problem came up again. Because of that very, very late delivery far beyond what we previously contracted for, the contractor filed claims against the District. For late delivery of digester gas compressors , the claims were $851,000 for 138 calendar days. For the electrical equipment, there were claims of $3.6 million for 320 calendar days. For the bonus/penalty �✓ the contractor requested some changes. The bonus/penalty provides a bonus for early completion with no cap. That totals $4.5 million for the contractor's claim and 660 calendar days of extensions. Change Order No. 8 resolves all of these issues. It provides for late digester compressor delivery of $347,000. That's for compressors that are delivered nearly one year late. It provides $61,000 for electrical equipment changes that includes circuit change credit for our extra review plus the manufacturer's We negotiated a $10,000 credit to the District. Finally, it provides a cap in the bonus earned by the contractor a maximum of $525,000 should early completion occur. The total change order is for $409,111.00 and 200 calendar days extension. It leaves only one thing open. It provides that the contractor cannot come after us for any further cost overruns because of late issues, any indirect job costs. But we have not yet resolved payment on certain electrical changes that are required on that switchgear. Those changes have been estimated by the contractor at $550,000.00-, and by staff adding $150,000.00. They will be brought to you for consideration at a later date. Mr. Chairman, that completes my report. JC: Questions? Mr. Collins? COLLINS: I'm frustrated with this. We're dealing with a contractor items that appear to not live up to the contract. They bid a contract and they were evidently the low bidder, I assume, and now they come in and they cannot provide the items that they said they could supply. Yet, we seem to be the �...►� people paying the cost of their inadequacy. JC: That's a statement? COLLINS: Yes. JC: Okay, Peer? SWAN: If I'm not mistaken, this was provided under separate contract and we told the contractor the builders were up there and they had to use the equipment that you were going to provide them and this is what it was going to look like. He based his bid on that information. I think he should be really hopping mad at us because the stuff he got was quite different from what he thought he was going to get. I'm amazed that the guy, after reading this thing, that he said he had $4.5 million worth of contract here that he would agree that he would take $400,000 for it, because this looks just terrible. I mean, I don't think . I think that's correct and I would like Tom to answer it. Is that correct? TMD: That is exactly correct. You are 100% on target. SWAN: So it was not the contractor'.s fault. The contractor thought he was going to get equipment that was going to look like something. He built the building exactly the way it's supposed to be. �/ -18- JC: Director Edgar? Excuse me, I thought you were done. Director Edgar? 1�� EDGAR: I have a simple question for Tom. delivered and installed? TMD: Yes. EDGAR: So this is Are all the contractor's equipment a complete reconciliation of what all happened? TMD: Yes, and I would like to make this one statement in that regard. Once we found out, you know we were in contracts, both with the manufacturer of the compressors and for the installation of the compressors and for the completion of the central generation. At that point in time we were caught in a real dilemma. Do we try to cancel the contract with Pennsylvania Compressors or do we go ahead and accept larger compressors knowing we're going to get some extra costs. We tried our best to come up with a good answer for this. We called every compressor manufacturer in the United States to see if we could quickly substitute another manufacturer. We couldn't get a better delivery starting at that point in time, and that's why we were so frustrated over this. JC: Director Main and then Director Plummer. MAIN: Well, I understand that the contractor that did the installing, I can see where he looks clean to me. I thought that first question was regarding the manufacturer of the compressor. He's the guy that screwed the whole operation up. What have we done to penalize him? TMD: We would prefer to take that up in closed session which is coming. MAIN: Thank you. PLUMMER: That was my question. Personally I think they lied to us. They knew �.i at the very beginning that they couldn't do it. So then they fool around for a year? I think that's terrible. JC: I understand. Director Catlin? CATLIN: Tom, we have these long-range contracts . How frequent is our liason with them? Even if we have to go back to keep track, day-to-day, week -to -week, month -to -month, to see how progress is TMD: We were on top of this. It certainly doesn't look like it, but we were on top of this. We were working with Penn throughout trying to get better delivery dates. They simply were non -responsive and I think we could talk about all of this in the next agenda item. JC: We'll have a closed session on the specific things in regards to Penn. We'll be dealing with a little different matter now. Any other questions with regards to this part of it? SWAN: Two things. Has the contractor agreed with this? TMD: The contractor signed it. SWAN: I'd like to refer this back to This is, I think I'd like to understand what went on here better than what, .if it's -not pressing to do that and . 1 , -19- TMD: I believe it is pressing. I would recommend that you, I would say to you that it is a pressing issue. SWAN: Why is it pressing? TMD: This contract is on -going and I think we were able to arrive at a very �•�' agreeable settlement to the District because the contractor is in need of money. The contractor was prepared to go ahead with the lawsuit and it is a pressing matter. '1.. JC: We have a motion and a second for approval of #18(b) and (c). Any further discussion? Is there opposition to the motion? Seeing none, then it will be deemed approved. SWAN: I'd like to have this item reviewed by the Fiscal Policy Committee even though we to understand what's'going on a little better. Seconded JC: Alright, we have a motion and a second to refer it back. Basically the motion is approved and the deal is cut, so you are just going to go back and look at it. That's fine, you can look at it. There will be no action on the item other than what we did this evening. Thank you. By the,way, one comment I would like to make, Tom. You're the only person who made a presentation this evening that could not get the visual aids to work so you're using flip charts and I want to thank you for that because we saved about 40 minutes tonight if you tried to learn how to run the machinery, so we appreciate that very much. We will now go into closed session. All those in the audience who are not Directors or staff members involved in these matters, please leave at this time. CLOSED SESSION - (See Closed Session notes) -20- PRESENTATION OUTLINE ANAHEIM/MWD/CSDOC ULF TOILET & LF SHOWERHEAD RETROFIT PILOT PROJECT • PROPOSAL OVERVIEW • PROPOSAL OBJECTIVE • PROPOSAL COSTS • PROPOSAL BENEFITS b • COMMITTEE RECOMMENC CSDOC COST SHARING RESIDENTIAL ►[r[h,E �HEIM CSDOC HOTEUMOTEL Fall MEN I A I kv, I mvvu OBJECTIVES - 4,000 RESIDENCES TOILETS • 4.4 Gallons per flush saved 4.4 Flushes per day per person 2.7 'People per household • Average of 1.7 toilets per household SHOWERS • 2.5 Gallons per minute saved 1.5 Shower per day per household 8.5 Minutes shower length gallons saved per household per day gallons saved per toilet per day gallons saved per shower per day OBJECTIVES - 1,000 HOTEUMOTEL ROOMS TOILETS • 4.1 Gallons per flush saved 5.5 Flushes per day per room SHOWERS • 2.5 Gallons per minute saved 1.5 Shower per day per room 8.5 Minutes shower length gallons saved per room per day gallons saved per shower per day TOTAL COSTS MWD & CSDOC Anaheim Total Share Share Project Residential ULF Toilet & LF Showerheads Hotel & Motel ULF Toilet & LF Showerheads TOTALS UNIT COSTS ►rye ; CSDOC Anaheim Total Share Share Project Residential ULF Toilet & LF Showerheads Hotel & Motel ULF Toilet & LF Showerheads BENEFITS • Districts accrue savings over minimum 10-year project life due to capital offsets and O&M reductions BENEFITS (cont'd) • Districts' 4&M cost to pump the flow and variable costs for energy, chemicals, etc. equals $236.11 per million gallons Toilets-7,800 Showerheads-7,800 tTttTOTA L Total Uni $137.1000 $17.56 per toilet $35,000 $—A_.49 per SH $1729000 $22.05 per toilet & SH BENEFITS (cont'd) • Districts' Capital Offsets accrue at $1.43 per gallon saved per day Toilets-7,800 Showerheads-7,800 TOTAL ToJ U nif. $310, 000 $39.74 per toilet 135,000 $1.7.31 per SH $445yOOO $57.05 per toilet & SH Lf BENEFITS (cont'd) • Districts' capital savings realized when a total of at least 6 mgd saved. To reach 6 mgd of firm, reliable savings, need to retrofit about 10% of Districts' equivalent dwelling units - about 80,000. COST- EFFECTIVENESS Total Unit Districts' Costs .$1.5471 t0.45 er toilet & SH Districts' Benefits O&MSavings $172,000 $22.05 per toilet & SH Capital Savings $445.000 $57.05 per toilet & SH TOTAL SAVINGS $617,000 $79.10 OOOW per toilet oiet&SH COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Determine interest of other cities and feasibility of obtaining 10% participation of properties in similar retrofit programs to attain at least a 6 mgd flow savings. 2. Hold in abeyance a recommendation on the residential portion of the proposed Anaheim/MWD/CSDOC retrofit project, pending feasibility determination. 3. Amend Phase II of the current Water Conservation Program to incorporate the proposed 1,000 room hotel/motel portion of the retrofit program with Anaheim/MWD costing Districts $45,481. OVERVIEW • Financial incentive to residential & hotel/motel customers • Retrofitup to 4,000 residents & 1,000 hotel/motel rooms • First ULF toilet retrofit proposal of any magnitude in Orange County • Pilot project that will provide information on the Orange County customer acceptance of toilet retrofit incentives January 3, 1992 ***MEMORANDUM*** TO: Rita Brown FROM: Margie Nellor SUBJECT: Copies of Slides for December 11, 1991 Board Presentation Per Wayne's request, attached to this memo are hard copies of the slides 1 used in my presentation to the Boards regarding the Wastewater Discharge Regulations and Fee Ordinance. If you need any additional information, please give me a call at extension Slide 1 ORDINANCE HISTORY ■ February 1954 ■ February 1958 ■ April1970 ■ July 1976 ■ July 1983 ■ September 1989 Slide 2 `-� PROPOSED WDR REVISIONS ■ Class I User and Significant Non -Compliance ■ Major and Minor Violations ■ Batch Dump and Non - Compliance Fees ■ Non -Compliance Sampling Fees ■ Civil Penalties OEM Slide 3 FEE ORDINANCE ■ Permit Fees ■ Wastehauler Fees and Charges ■ Administrative Fees for Obtaining Tax and Water Data ■ Appeal Hearing Filing Fees ■ Non -Compliance Sampling Fees ■ Major Violation - Laboratory Costs ■ Minor Violation - Laboratory Costs $455+ $200+ Slide 4 REVISION PROCESS ■ July 15th Mailing to Ad Hoc Committee ■ July 25th Ad Hoc Committee Meeting ■ July 30th Mailings to All Permittees . ■ August 8th Public Meeting ■ September 15th Public Review Period Ended Slide 5 SCHEDULE FOR ADOPTION ■ December 11, 1991 - Introduction/First Reading ■ January 8, 1992 - Second Reading/Adoption ■ February 7, 1992 - Effective Date COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS, 19 29 39 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON DECEMBER 11, 1991 ,tyVATlpi� rv 195" COUI ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE 3 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL \4� \1w! A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on December 11, 1991, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: x Dan Griset, Chairman Robert Richardson 7--Charles E. Puckett, Chairman pro tem Richard B. Edgar x Fred Barrera Gene Beyer x Roger Stanton Don R. Roth x James A. Wahner James Ferryman DISTRICT NO. 2: a Iry Pickler, Chairman Fred Hunter x John Collins, Chairman pro tem George Scott x Fred Barrera Beyer x Bob Bell _Gene Barry Denes x Buck Catlin Chris Norby x William D. Mahoney James H. Flora x Robert H. Main Norman Culver x Carrey J. Nelson Glenn Parker a --Arthur G. Newton Carol Downey Miguel Pulido 7—Dan Griset x Roger Stanton Don R. Roth x Henry W. Wedaa Irwin Fried DISTRICT NO. 3: x Sal A. Sapien, Chairman Harry M. Dotson x Peter Green, Chairman pro tem Earle Robitaille x Buck Catlin Chris Norby x John Collins George Scott x Norman Culver H. Main x Burnie Dunlap —Robert Carrey J. Nelson -7 —James V. Evans Margie L. Rice x James H. Flora William D. Mahoney x Don R. Griffin Rhonda J. McCune x Frank Laszlo Edna Wilson Pat McGuigan x Robert Richardson x Keith A. Nelson Eva G. Miner x Richard Partin Cecilia L. Age a Iry Pickler Fred Hunter x Roger Stanton Don R. Roth x Charles Sylvia Ronald Bates DISTRICT NO. 5: x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman Evelyn Hart —x—Don R. Roth, Chairman pro tem Roger Stanton x Phil Sansone John C. Cox, Jr. DISTRICT NO. 6: x James A. Wahner, Chairman Dick Sherrick x Don R. Roth, Chairman pro tem Roger Stanton x Evelyn Hart Ruthelyn Plummer DISTRICT NO. 7: x Richard B. Edgar, Chairman Charles E. Puckett -7 —James A. Wahner, Chairman pro tem Nate Reade x Fred Barrera =Gene Beyer John C. Cox, Jr. x Ruthelyn Plummer -7 —Robert Richardson Miguel Pulido x Don R. Roth Roger Stanton a Sally Anne Sheridan Barry Hammond DISTRICT NO. 11: x Grace Winchell, Chairman Linda Moulton -Patterson a Jack Kelly, Chairman pro tem Jim Silva 7—Roger Stanton Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 13: x William D. Ehrle, Chairman Fred Hunter -7--Fred Barrera, Chairman pro tem Gene Beyer x John M. Gullixson Mark Schwing Glenn Parker -7--Burnie Dunlap x Don R. Roth Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chairman Darryl Miller 7--Sally Anne Sheridan Barry Hammond 7-Fred Barrera, Chairman pro tem Gene Beyer Leslie A. Pontious x Richard B. Edgar x Don R. Roth Roger Stanton -2- 12/11/91 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita Brown, Board Secretary, Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle, Carolyn Bruskin, Corinne Clawson, Don Crapnell, Patti Gorczyca, Ed Hodges, Margie Nellor, Charles Nichols, Bob Ooten, Mary Simpson, Jack Vincent, Jim Wybenga Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Darrell Ament, Matthew A. Boscia, Jamel Demir, Bill Knopf, Mary Lee, Matthew Puffer, John Shaw, Mark Schwing, Atossa Soltani, Phil Stone ************* DISTRICT 2 & 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file minute excerpt from the City of La Habra re Board That the minute excerpt from the City appointment of La Habra re election of mayor and appointment of alternate Directors, and seating new members of the Boards be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows: (*Mayor) District Active Director Alternate Director 2 William D. Mahoney James H. Flora* 3 James H. Flora* William D. Mahoney DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file minute excerpt from the City of Los Alamitos re That the minute excerpt from the City Board appointment of Los Alamitos re election of mayor and appointment of alternate Director, and seating new members of the Board be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows: (*Mayor) District Active Director Alternate Director 3 Charles E. Sylvia Ronald Bates* DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file minute excerpt from the City of Cypress re Board That the minute excerpt from the City appointment of Cypress re election of mayor and appointment of alternate Director, and seating new members of the Board be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows: (*Mayor) District Active Director Alternate Director 3 Richard Partin* Cecilia Age -3- LIM It 12/11/91 ,*.V/ DISTRICT 2 & 13 Receive and file minute excerpt from the City of Yorba Linda re Board appointments Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the minute excerpt from the City of Yorba Linda re election of mayor and appointment of alternate Directors, and seating new members of the Board be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows: (*Mayor) District Active Director Alternate Director 2 Henry W. Wedaa Irwin Fried* 13 John M. Gullixson Irwin Fried* ALL DISTRICTS Presentation of District pins to Directors Districts' logo to these Directors. pins given to employees and recognize Board of the Sanitation Districts. The Joint Chairman welcomed recently -seated Directors Hank Wed and Richard Partin back to the Boa and presented pins bearing the The pins are similar to the service the Directors for their service on as rds the ALL DISTRICTS Darrell Ament, representative of the Recognition of persons who wish to City of Anahiem, Public Utilities be heard on specific agenda items Department, requested to be recognized at the appropriate time in connection with the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee's recommendation to amend the Districts' Water Conservation Implementation Plan, Phase I -IV, being conducted in conjunction with the City of Anaheim and the Metropolitan Water District. ALL DISTRICTS Changing the regular February 1992 meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors from February 12, 1992 to February 19, 1992 February 19, 1992 due to a legal ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chairman Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the regular February 1992 meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors, be, and is hereby, changed from February 12, 1992 to holiday on February 12, 1992. Fiscal Policy Committee was scheduled at 5:30 p.m. The Joint Chairman wished Directors and staff a happy holiday season and new year. He then advised that the to meet on Wednesday, December 18th, DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes- amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held November 13, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held November 13, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -4- 12/11/91 DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held November 13, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held November 13, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held November 13, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held November 13, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held November 13, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held November 13, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held November 13, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 11/06/91 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 703,736.57 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 4,670,497.93 Joint Working Capital Fund - 147,962.22 Self -Funded Insurance Funds - 29,544.13 DISTRICT.NO. 1 DISTRI T NO. 2 DISTRICT NO. DISTRICT NO. 5 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 308.40 - 18,443.35 - 67,077.88 - 920.19 - 2,484.98 - 11,852.35 - 36,802.28 - 63.66 - 9,254.87 - 4,017.36 - 2,162.26 - 24.92 5,705,15 5 11/20/91 $ 934,877.25 392,782.04 325,046.98 5,794.93 1,503.60 317,113.24 17,975.74 71,797.59 687.50 495,162.17 8,436.47 -0- 6,716.48 2,834.64 -0- 88.83 2,580,817.46 -5- 12/11/91 1..,1 M ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Motorola Communications and Electronics, Inc. for Purchase of Two -Way Radio Equipment (Specification No. E-211) Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to Motorola Communications and Electronics, Inc. for the negotiated amount of $45,624.00 plus sales tax, for Purchase of Two -Way Radio Equipment (Specification No. E-211). ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Brinderson Corporation for Removal of Precast Concrete Parapets on Headworks B and -Cat Plant No. 2, Specification No. M-037 Specification No. M-037. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing staff to issue Change Order No. 4 to Purchase Order No. 34691 issued to Office Pavilion Interior Resources for Purchase and Installation of Administration Building Interior Office Partitioning Systems and Furnishings, Job No. J-7-5 No. J-7-5, authorizing a net deductio authorized amount from $1,049,210.69 exceed $1,021,512.16 plus sales tax. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Change Order No. 9 to the plans and specifications for Job No. J-17 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to Brinderson Corporation in an amount not to exceed $84,800.00 for Removal of Precast Concrete Parapets on Headworks B and C at Plant No. 2, Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby authorized to issue Change Order No. 4 to Purchase Order No. 34691 issued to Office Pavilion/Interior Resources for Purchase and Installation of Administration Building Interior Office Partitioning Systems and Furnishings, Job n of $27,698.53, decreasing the total plus sales tax to an amount not to Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 9 to the plans and specifications for Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17, authorizing an addition of $47,979.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for seven items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for Job No. J-19-1 No. J-19-1, authorizing a deduction Hunter Corporation for extraordinary ensure that certain equipment meets approved. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job of $20,000.00 from the contract with costs incurred by the Districts to the specifications, be, and is hereby, 12/11/91 ALL DISTRICTS Approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Job No. J-23-1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Control Center/Operations and Maintenance Building, Job No. J-23-1, authorizing a net addition of $10,856.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for four items of added or deleted work, and granting a time extension of four calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Change Order No. 15 to the plans and specifications for Job No. P1-33 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 15 to the plans and specifications for Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33, authorizing an addition of $66,897.00 to the contract with Gust K. Newberg Construction Company for nine items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Gas Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-1 Approving Change Order No. 14 to the plans and specifications for Job No. P1-34-1 project, authorizing an addition Ziebarth & Alper for two items of approved. Approving Change Order No. 15 to the plans and specifications for Job No. P-34-1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 14 to the plans and specifications for said of $10,123.00 to the contract with additional work, be, and is hereby, project, authorizing a deduction of Ziebarth & Alper for extraordinary ensure that certain equipment meets approved. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 15 to the plans and specifications for said $20,000.00 from the contract with costs incurred by the Districts to specifications, be, and is hereby, ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 5 to the plans Job Nos. P1-34-3, P1-35-2 and J-21 and specifications for Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-3; Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-2; and Installation of Waste Digester Gas Flare Facilities at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-21, authorizing an addition of $48,734.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. for one item of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. -7- 12/11/91 `r� ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing renewal of memberships in CASA and AMSA for 1992 That renewal of memberships in the California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA) and the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) for the 1992 calendar year, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Receive, file and approve written report of the Fiscal Policy Committee hereby, received, ordered filed and ALL DISTRICTS Receive, file and approve staff Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the written report of the Fiscal Policy Committee's meeting held on November 20, 1991, be, and is approved. Moved, seconded and duly carried: Summary Financial Report That the staff Summary Financial Report for the three-month period ending September 30, 1991, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Receive, file and approve written report of the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee November 21, 1991, be, and is hereby, Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the written report of the. Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee's meeting held on received, ordered filed and approved. Verbal report of Staff The General Manager stated that Director Cox, Chairman of the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee, had requested that staff report on this item as he had been unexpectedly called out of town. Mr. Sylvester then reported that,water conservation has not traditionally been the. role of a wastewater management agency. Prior to adoption of "2020 VISION", the Districts' water conservation efforts focused on reducing industrial discharges through our source control program. However, the 30-year Action Plan approved by the Boards in 1989 formally established an aggresive water conservation program as a major policy of the Districts. The benefits are many, some to the Districts, some to other entities, all to the public. Conservation saves capital and operating costs of developing and delivering water resources by reducing demand. Conservation saves capital and operating costs of sewage collection, treatment and disposal by reducing sewer discharges. Conservation also preserves our limited supply of precious water. Until now, the Districts have been easing into their water conservation program. The major efforts to date have been directed towards public education and small pilot projects with other public and private partners to determine the most effective conservation measures for the Districts to be involved in. The Committee's position has been to consider projects on a case by case basis, for the most part as they have been proposed to the Districts by other agencies. The Boards have approved four projects to date. The proposed Anaheim project is the largest to be brought before the Boards for consideration. 12/11/91 He further reported that the proposed Anaheim project clearly demonstrates that through such partnerships, investment in water conservation programs can achieve the stated goals and objectives to the benefit of all the participants and the public at large. In fact, there must be partnerships and long-term commitments for the programs to be successful. However, because of the size of our operation, to realize any true savings, we cannot be satisfied with limited, relatively small projects saving.a few million gallons. If the program stops with the proposed Anaheim project there would not be a favorable return on our investment because it alone is not large enough to avoid constructing an increment of treatment. The Districts, to truly realize the projected payback, must participate in programs that will cumulatively save tens of millions of gallons to avoid construction of logical increments of wastewater treatment facilities. A major issue before the Directors, therefore, is whether the Districts' Boards wish to assume and commit to the leadership role in the County and actively solicit participation from the cities and other water and sewering agencies within our jurisdictional boundaries, and MWD, to participate as partners in programs similar to the proposed Anaheim project. Mr. Sylvester then requested that the Manager of the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee, Charles Nichols, give a brief presentation on the proposed program. Using slides, Mr. Nichols then gave a brief overview of the project and the staff's written report to the Directors. He stated that a more detailed presentation had been made to the Committee addressing the areas of water resource management, population growth, impact of growth on public services and utilities, and the importance of water conservation to the Districts and the communities they serve. Mr. Nichols stated that the Anaheim pilot project would provide financial incentives of up to $100.00 as rebates to homeowners for up to 4,000 households for retrofitting with ultra low -flush toilets (ULFT) and low -flow showerheads (LFS). Also, similar incentives would be offered for up to 1,000 hotel and motel rooms in the City. It would be the first retrofit proposal of any magnitude in Orange County and would provide the opportunity to gather information on acceptance of water conservation retrofitting measures by members of the community and the most effective means of implementing such measures. Mr. Nichols made it clear that the proposed Anaheim project may not be cost-effective on a stand-alone basis unless other similar projects are also accomplished. This aspect of the project economics results from not being able to count the capital savings until a 6 mgd increment of flow savings has been realized. The 6 mgd increment relates to the size of treatment modules constructed by the Districts. To achieve the first increment of capital savings, the Districts would need to retrofit about 10% of the equivalent dwelling units in the entire service area. The 0&M savings for the project and substantial but do not offset the cost of the Districts' portion of the project. It was -� noted that this Anaheim proposal is a pilot project that would reach about 0.6% of the Districts' equivalent dwelling units. 10 12/11/91 He also stated that a Districts' -wide conservation retrofit program would include over 800,000 equivalent dwelling units in the service. area. This could include as many as 80,000 commercial and industrial outlets. Staff has conservatively estimated the potential wastewater savings to equal 62.4 mgd. The costs of implementing such a proposal are potentially substantial. The potential benefits to the Districts are, for an estimated flow savings of 62.4 mgd, net savings equal to $63.3 million. These savings would result from 0&M savings plus avoided capital costs for the construction of facilities such as pipelines, pump stations, primary clarifiers, power systems and related equipment. With regard to the specific proposal before the Boards, Mr. Nichols estimated the water conservation as follows: Gallons Per Da Per Household or Hotel Motel Room Grand ULFT LFS Total Total Residential 50.0 gpd 20.0 gpd 70.0 gpd 280,000 gpd Hotel/Motel 22.5 gpd 20.0 gpd 42.5 gpd 32,000 gpd 312,000 gpd The partnership cost sharing for the pilot project is summarized as follows: COST Partners MWD/Anaheim Districts Total Residential % Sharing 72% 28% 100% Unit Cost $ 100.56 $ 39.70 $ 140.26 Total Cost $683,809.00 $269,990.00 $' 953,799.00 Hotels/Motels % Sharing Unit Cost Total Cost Average % Sharing Average Unit Cost GRAND TOTAL COST 66% 34% $ 87.77 $ 45.48 $ 87,769.00 71% $ 98.92 $771,578.00 $ 45,481.00 29% $ 40.45 100% $ 133.25 $ 133,250.00 100% $ 139.37 $315,471.00 $1,087,049.00 In addition to the above costs, residents and hotels/motels would absorb certain additional expenses for the retrofitting. Mr. Nichols then summarized the cost/benefit comparison of the proposal for the Districts, as follows: -10- 12/11/91 DISTRICTS' BENEFIT (Cost Savings) 0 & M Capital Total Average per Unit $ 22.05 $ 54.05 $ 79.10 Total Benefit $122,000.00 $445,000.00 $ 617,000.00 The net benefit to the Districts would be $301,529.00 ($617,000.00 less $315,471.00). However, Mr. Nichols pointed out that in the event the pilot project proceeded but other cities and local water agencies did not step forward to implement similar programs Districts -wide, so that an increment of treatment plant expansion could be avoided, the potential maximum financial exposure to the Districts for the total project would only be $143,471.00, the difference between the $315,471.00 cost and the projected 0&M savings of $172,000.00 which would be realized. On the other hand, if only the hotel/motel retrofit portion of the program goes forward, as recommended by the Committee, the maximum exposure would be $29,000.00. After briefing the Directors on the status of MWD's consideration of participating in future conservation programs, Mr. Nichols summarized the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee's recommendations as follows: Determine interest of other cities and feasibility of obtaining 10% participation of properties in similar retrofit programs to attain at least a six mgd flow savings. - Hold in abeyance a recommendation on the residential portion of the proposed Anaheim/MWD/CSDOC retrofit project, pending feasibility determination. - Amend the Districts' Water Conservation Implementation Plan, Phases I -IV, to delete the previously -approved Phase II -.10% Hotel/Motel Retrofit in Anaheim (1,720 rooms with Districts' share of the cost being $44,290.00); and replace it with the proposed Phase II - ULF Toilet/LF Showerhead Retrofit Program in Anaheim (1,000 rooms with Districts' share of the cost being $45,481.00) in cooperation with the City of Anaheim and the Metropolitan Water District; and authorize payment to the City of Anaheim in an amount not to exceed $45,481.00. Following a question and answer period during which Mr. Nichols answered Directors' questions on the written staff report and potential participation in similar programs by others, the Joint Chairman then recognized Darryl Ament from the City of Anaheim who had asked to address the Boards on this item. Mr. Ament is the City's Assistant General Manager for Management Services in the Public Utilities Department. Mr. Ament was accompanied by Atossa Soltanti, Program Manager of the water conservation program for the City of Anaheim. Mr. Ament stated that the City of Anaheim is looking at a variety of water conservation programs because it makes economic sense. He described some of the efforts and illustrated certain information on the board for the Directors to emphasize his points. One of the programs Anaheim is considering is the ultra low -flush toilet program because 50% of internal residential usage of water is the toilet. If that usage could be reduced -11- 12/11/91 then that would be a substantial impact. There is also a tremendous amount of tourism in the City. Most tourists aren't aware of the water problem and are not concerned with how many times they flush a toilet, which is why Anaheim has started the ultra low -flush toilet program. The City has concluded that replacement of existing toilets with ULFT's is where the City can get its best return for the investment. He commented that he thought the other cities would come to the same conclusion. In answering questions posed by Directors on a device called the Fluid Master, Atossa Soltani stated that the Fluid Master could take a five to seven gallon toilet and reduce it to approximately 36 gallons without pushing the toilet's performance to the limit. However, it was.felt that replacing older toilets with a 1.6 gallon toilet was a more permanent fixture and would reliably save more water. She also stated that a study has been done by the Metropolitan Water District over the last several years and is soon due to be released. She also stated there are close to 100 different toilet alternative flushing devices, but the majority are difficult for the consumer to install and have a limited life of six months to two years. Many of the devices interfere with the performance of the toilets. Ms. Soltani reported many engineering reports stated that with many of these devices one does not get adequate flushing performance by reducing volume of the tank. However, ultra low -flush toilets were designed to evacuate waste using only 1.6 gallons. It isn't just the reduction of the tank that makes it work, but rather the design of the bowl and mechanisms. She pointed out that once a customer participates in a water -reduction program, you want to make a long-lasting impact. If they are willing to particpate, it is better to go for the long-term impact rather than short-term. The best way to do this is by retrofitting with ULFT's. After further discussion and comment by Directors, it was moved and seconded: That the Districts' Water Conservation Implementation Plan, Phases I -IV, be amended to delete the previously -approved Phase II - 10% Hotel/Motel Retrofit in Anaheim (1,720 rooms with Districts' share of the cost being $44,290.00); and to replace it with the proposed Phase II - ULF Toilet/LF Showerhead Retrofit Program in Anaheim (1,000 rooms with Districts' share of the cost being $45,481.00) in cooperation with the City of Anaheim and the Metropolitan Water District; and authorizing payment to the City of Anaheim in an amount not to exceed $45,481.00. Following further discussion, a substitute motion was moved and seconded, to amend the Districts' Water Conservation Implementation Plan, Phases I -IV, to delete the previously -approved Phase II - 10% Hotel/Motel Retrofit in Anaheim (1,720 rooms with Districts' share of the cost being $44,290.00); and to replace it with the proposed Phase II - ULF Toilet/LF Showerhead Retrofit Program in Anaheim (1,000 rooms with Districts' share of the cost being $45,481.00) in cooperation with the City of Anaheim and the Metropolitan Water District; and authorizing payment to the City of Anaheim in an amount not to exceed $45,481.00, subject to the Districts' staff being satisfied that there are reasonable contributions to the program from those hotels and motels that would benefit from it. Following a roll call vote, the Board Secretary announced that the substitute motion had failed, two Districts voting in favor, six Districts `a / voting against, and one District with a tie vote. -12- 12/11/91 A roll call vote was then taken on the original motion to amend the Districts' Water Conservation Implementation Plan, Phases I -IV, to delete the previously -approved Phase II - 10% Hotel/Motel Retrofit in Anaheim (1,720 rooms with Districts' share of the cost being $44,290.00); and to replace it with the proposed Phase II - ULF Toilet/LF Showerhead Retrofit Program in Anaheim (1,000 rooms with Districts' share of the cost being $45,481.00) in cooperation with the City of Anaheim and the Metropolitan , Water District; and authorizing payment to the City of Anaheim in an amount not to exceed $45,481.00. Following the roll call vote, the Board Secretary announced that the original motion had failed, three Districts voting in favor, five Districts voting against, and one District with a tie vote. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re proposed ordinances establishing wastewater discharge regulations and source control Tees, administrative fees, non- compliance sampling fees and miscellaneous charges Verbal report of staff and The Districts' Source Control General Counsel Manager, Margaret Nellor, reported there were two ordinances that were being presented for the Directors' consideration. The first is a revised version of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations (WDR), which incorporates recent EPA regulations and recommendations as well as recent changes to state law that occurred in October 1991. The second ordinance is a fee ordinance which is a compilation of all the various fees and charges that are important for the administration of the Districts' source control program as well as the wastewater discharge regulation ordinance. The proposed WDR revisions include revised definitions for Class I users and significant non-compliance terms to comply with recent EPA regulations which were implemented last year. There are also revised definitions for major and -minor violations. These are being made in accordance with recommendtions from EPA that we base these kinds of violations not only on violations of mass emission limits but also concentration limits. The third change that is significant is deletion of the term batch dump and deletion of batch dump non-compliance fees. Our existing permit authority and enforcement authority is sufficient to regulate and control these kinds of discharges as well as new statutory authority for civil penalties, which grants the ability to fine dischargers that dump illegally. Also added are new non-compliance sampling fees to replace the old non-compliance fees. The new fees are being incorporated on advice of Legal Counsel. They will recover our cost of doing back out and resampling a non -compliant industry to recover our administrative costs, field costs and lab costs. The old fees, which were based on each pound of discharge in excess of the established limit, did not, in all cases, recover our costs, end in many instances were not significant enough to be a deterrent. The new fees will take care of that problem and will be a deterrent to help bring companies into compliance. -13- 12/11/91 In October 1991 the Governor signed into law, Senate Bill 1024 which �..� was authored by Senator David Roberti. This law gives us the authority to seek civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation per day. Our previous authority was $6,000. Now, for the very first time, we also have the authority to levy administrative fines. We can fine someone up to $2,000 per day for non -submittal information, up to $3,000 per day for failure to comply with a compliance schedule, up to $5,000 per violation per day for discharge violations and up to $10 per gallon for discharging a prohibited substance. The latter kind of fine can be used for batch dumps. The proposed fee ordinance is also a recommendation of legal counsel that these fees be enacted and adopted by Ordinance. The permit fees, waste hauler fees, administrative fees and filing fees are existing fees and they were adopted by different Board resolutions. Added to that are the new non-compliance sampling fees which, for a major violation, are $455.00 plus laboratory costs. For a minor violation it's $200.00 plus laboratory costs. The revision process to the Ordinance began last Spring and culminated in a July 15th mailing to our Industrial Users' Ad Hoc Committee. This is a group of industry representatives who serve on an advisory basis for our source control policies and procedures. On July 25th we had a meeting of the Committee. On July 30th, we mailed the revision to the ordinances to all our permit holders and then on August 8th we had a public meeting. We received comments from only three industries. Our public review period ended on September 15th. The comments received dealt mainly with clarification of EPA regulations. Some of them dealt with sampling procedures. Many of the comments were valuable and were used to revise the ordinance language. The proposed schedule for adoption is that the ordinance be introduced and have its first reading tonight. At the January 8th Board Meeting it would have its second reading, a public hearing and then be considered for adoption. The effective date would be February 7, 1992, 30 days following adoption. Following a clarification of overhead costs used in calculating the non-compliance sampling fees, the following actions were taken by the respective Boards. Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried: dated November 19, 1991 That the Staff Report dated November 19, 1991 re proposed ordinances establishing wastewater discharge regulations and source control fees, administrative fees, non-compliance sampling fees and miscellaneous charges be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. -14- 12/11/91 DISTRICT 1 Actions re introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 119 Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 119 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines That the Board of Directors , hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 119, An Ordinance of The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 113 and 117 is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15307 and 15308 in that the Ordinance establishes regulatory processes to be taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment and natural resources. First reading of proposed Ordinance Moved, seconded and duly carried: No. 119 That proposed Ordinance No. 119, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 113 and 117, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 119 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 119, an Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 113 and 117, be introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on January 8, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. DISTRICT 2 Actions re •introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 214 Making finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 214 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 214, An Ordinance of The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 208 and 212 is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15307 and 15308 in that the Ordinance establishes regulatory processes to be taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment and natural resources. 12/11/91 First reading of proposed Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 214 That proposed Ordinance No. 214, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 208 and 212 be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is'hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 214 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 214, an Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 208 and 212, be introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on January 8, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. DISTRICT 3 Actions re introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 317 Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 317 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 317, An Ordinance of The Board of Directors of County �.% Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange.County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 311 and 315 is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15307 and 15308 in that the Ordinance establishes regulatory processes to be taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment and natural resources. First reading of proposed Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 317 That proposed Ordinance No. 317, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 311 and 315, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 317 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 317, an Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 311 and 315, be introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on January 8, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's �.% Administrative Office. St-11 12/11/91 DISTRICT 5 Actions re introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 526 Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 526 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 526, An Ordinance of The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 520 and 524 is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15307 and 15308 in that the Ordinance establishes regulatory processes to be taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment and natural resources. First reading of proposed Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 526 That proposed Ordinance No. 526, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 520 and 524, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 526 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 526, an Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 520 and 524, be introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on January 8, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. DISTRICT 6 Actions re introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 620 Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 620 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 620, An Ordinance of The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 614 and 618 is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15307 and 15308 in that the Ordinance establishes regulatory processes to be taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment and natural resources. -17- 12/11/91 First reading of proposed Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 620 That proposed Ordinance No. 620, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District \� No. 6 of Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 614 and 618, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 620 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 620, an Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 614 and 618, be introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on January 8, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. DISTRICT 7 Actions re introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 727 Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 727 is statutorily exempt per.CEQA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 727, An Ordinance of The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 722 and 726 is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15307 and 15308 in that the Ordinance establishes regulatory processes to be taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment and natural resources. First reading of proposed Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 727 That proposed Ordinance No. 727, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 722 and 726, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 727 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 727, an Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 722 and 726, be introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on January 8, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Lr+� Administrative Office. -18- 12/11/91 DISTRICT 11 Actions re introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 1116 Making finding that adoption .of Ordinance No. 1116 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines Ordinance No. 1116, An Ordinance of Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange Wastewater Discharge Regulations and 1114 is statutorily exempt pursuant Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15307 establishes regulatory processes to the protection of the environment an First reading of proposed Ordinance No. 1116 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of The Board of Directors of County County, California, Establishing Repealing Ordinance Nos. 1110 and to California Environmental Quality and 15308 in that the Ordinance be taken by the District to assure d natural resources. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 1116, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. it of Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 1110 and 1114, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 1116 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 1116, an Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 1110 and 1114, be introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on January 8, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. DISTRICT 13 Actions re introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 1311 Making finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 1311 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines Ordinance No. 1311, An Ordinance of Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange Wastewater Discharge Regulations and 1309 is statutorily exempt pursuant Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15307 establishes regulatory processes to the protection of the environment an Imals Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of The Board of Directors of County County, California, Establishing Repealing Ordinance Nos. 1305 and to California Environmental Quality and 15308 in that the Ordinance be taken by the District to assure d natural resources. �ar�/ 12/11/91 First reading of proposed Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 1311 An Ordinance of the Board \� No. 13 of Orange County, Regulations and Repealing title only; and, That proposed Ordinance No. 1311, of Directors of County Sanitation District California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Ordinance Nos. 1305 and 1309, be read by FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 1311 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 1311, an Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 1305 and 1309, be introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on January 8, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. DISTRICT 14 Actions re introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 1403 Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 1403 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 1403, An Ordinance of The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations and Repealing Ordinance No. 1402 is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15307 and 15308 in that the Ordinance establishes regulatory processes to be taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment and natural resources. First reading of proposed Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 1403 That proposed Ordinance No. 1403, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations and Repealing Ordinance No. 1402, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 1403 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 1403, an Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations and Repealing Ordinance No. 1402 be introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on January 8, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. -20- 12/11/91 DISTRICT 1 Actions re introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 120 Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 120 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 120, An Ordinance of The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. First reading of proposed Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 120 That proposed Ordinance No. 120, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be, read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 120 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 120, an Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on January 8, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. DISTRICT 2 Actions re introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 215 Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 215 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 215, An Ordinance of The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. -21-, 12/11/91- \1.1.0/ o� First reading of proposed Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 215 That proposed Ordinance No. 215, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be, read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 215 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 215, an Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on January 8, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. DISTRICT 3 Actions re introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 318 Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 318 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 318, An Ordinance of The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines,Sections 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. First reading of proposed Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 318 That proposed Ordinance No. 318, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be, read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 318 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 318, an Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on'January 8, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. -22- 12/11/91 DISTRICT 5 Actions re introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 527 Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 527 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 527, An Ordinance of The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. First readi.ng of proposed Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 527 That proposed Ordinance No. 527, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be, read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 527 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 527, an Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on January 8, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. DISTRICT 6 Actions re introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 621 Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 621 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 621, An Ordinance of The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. F9 -23- 12/11/91 First reading of proposed Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 621 That proposed Ordinance No. 621, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges; be, read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 621 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 621, an Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on January 8, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. DISTRICT 7 Actions re introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 728 Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 728 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 728, An Ordinance of The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. First reading of proposed Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 728 That proposed Ordinance No. 728, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be, read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 728 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 728, an Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on January 8, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. -24- 12/11/91 DISTRICT 11 Actions re introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 1117 Making finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 1117 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 1117, An Ordinance of The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. First reading of proposed Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 1117 That proposed Ordinance No. 1117, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be, read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 1117 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That -Ordinance No. 1117, an Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on January 8, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. DISTRICT 13 Actions re introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 1312 Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 1312 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 1312, An Ordinance of The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. -25- Via.✓ 12/11/91 First reading of proposed Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 1312 That proposed Ordinance No. 1312, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be, read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 1312 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 1312, an Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on January 8, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. DISTRICT 14 Actions re introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 1404 Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 1404 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 1404, An Ordinance of The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. First reading of proposed Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 1404 That proposed Ordinance No. 1404, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be, read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 1404 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 1404, an Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non -Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on January 8, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. -26- 12/11/91 ALL DISTRICTS Actions re settlement of dispute between Districts and Brinderson Corporation re construction of Central Power Generation System at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-19-2 Verbal Report of staff and The Director of Engineering General Counsel reported that Job No. J-19-2 at Plant No. 2 is part of the new $66 million master -planned Central Power Generation System which is being built under several contracts at both plants. This $20 million contract includes installation of five pre -purchased digester -gas burning, spark -ignited 4167 horsepower engines with generators which are each capable of producing 3000 KW of electrical power, plus three pre -purchased gas compressors. Mr. Dawes stated that proposed Change Order No. 8 resolves a serious contractual dispute between the Contractor and the Districts. He referred to a Confidential Staff Report dated December 5, 1991, which discussed in detail the reasons for proposed Change Order No. 8 to resolve a serious dispute over two items on this job. The two.items are (1) late delivery of Districts -furnished digester gas compressors which, in addition, were much larger and heavier than indicated in the plans and specifications; and (2) design issues regarding electrical equipment. This change order resolves the dispute between the Contractor, Brinderson and the Districts over seven claims submitted by the l 1 contractor, totalling $4,500,000 and a requested 660 calendar days time gad extension. It resolves all major issues to date on this contract for a change order adding $409,110.00 and 200 calendar days to the contract. Because of possible litigation pertaining to this item, discussion of certain aspects were deferred to the scheduled closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9. The following actions were then taken. Receive and file confidential Moved, seconded and duly carried: Staff Report That the confidential Staff Report dated December 5, 1991, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Approving Change Order No. 8 to Moved, seconded and duly carried: the plans and specifications for Job No. J-19-2 That Change Order No. 8 to the plans and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-19-2, authorizing a net addition of $409,111.00 to the contract with Brinderson Corporation for six items of added or deleted work, and granting a time extension of 200 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. l -27-✓ 12/11/91 M llm� ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Convene in closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 The Boards convened in closed session at 9:17 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board(s) of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. ALL DISTRICTS At 9:57 p.m. the Boards reconvened in Reconvene in regular session regular session. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:57 p.m., December 11, 1991. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Agreement for Exchange of Property with The Irvine Company re That the Board of Directors hereby Construction of Contract adopts Resolution No. 91-184-5, Nos. 5-35-2 and 5-36 approving Agreement for Exchange of Property with The Irvine Company, required in connection with construction of the South Coast Trunk Sewer, Phase 2, Contract No. 5-35-2, and the Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Approving Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement That the Selection Committee with The Keith Companies for design certification of the final negotiated and construction services re fee relative to Addendum No. 2 to the Contract Nos. 5-35 and 5-36 Professional Services Agreement with The Keith Companies for design and for the South Coast Trunk Sewer, Contract Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36, providing for improvements requested by the State, be, filed and approved; and, Moved, seconded and duly carried: construction services required No. 5-35, and the Crystal Cove for additional design services and is hereby, received, order FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 91-185-5, approving Addendum No. 2 to said agreement with The Keith Companies for said additional services, on an hourly -rate basis for labor including overhead, for an additional amount not to exceed $45,107.00, increasing the total authorized -compensation from $161,250.00 to an amount not to exceed $206,357.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:57 p.m., December 11, 1991. r✓ -28- 12/11/91 DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County.Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:57 p.m., December 11, 1991. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: - Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 1 to the plans Contract No. 7-11-2 and specifications for Relocation of Michelson Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-2, authorizing an addition of $34,897.00 to the contract with Mitchell Pacific Constructors, Inc. for one item of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Reimbursement Agreement with the Irvine Ranch Water That the Board of Directors hereby (IRWD re reimbursement of costs to adopts Resolution No. 91-186-7, construct and connect two District approving Reimbursement Agreement gravity sewers from abandoned Bent with the Irvine Ranch Water District Tree Lane and Overhill Drive pump (IRWD), providing for reimbursement stations to IRWD's Harvard Avenue of costs to construct and connect two Trunk Sewer District gravity sewers from abandoned Bent Tree Lane and Overhill Drive pump stations to IRWD's Harvard Avenue Trunk Sewer. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and deny claim of City of Tustin for indemnity re That the claim of City of Tustin claim filed against City by dated November 14, 1991, in an Oscar Flores in connection with undetermined amount, for indemnity to relocation of District sewers by include defense costs, attorneys' CALTRANS fees and costs of investigation relative to a claim filed against the City of Tustin by Oscar M. Flores in an undetermined amount for alleged personal damages incurred in connection with relocation of District sewers by CALTRANS as part of the construction on the Interstate 5 Freeway/Redhill Boulevard, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the District's General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:57 p.m., December 11, 1991. DISTRICT it Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the - meeting so adjourned at 9:57 p.m., December 11, 1991. l ; -29- v� 12/11/91 DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:57 p.m., December 11, 1991. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:57 p.m., December 11, 1991. DISTRICT 2 Actions re Contract Nos. 2-26-3, 2-28 and 2-29 Approving Change Order No. 4 to Moved, seconded and duly carried: the plans and specifications for Contract Nos. 2-26-3, 2-28 and 2-29 That Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue (including City of Anaheim Street Improvements), Contract No. 2-26-3; Katella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street (Ninth Street), Contract No. 2-28; and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29, authorizing an addition of $55,869.00 to the contract with Steve Bubalo Construction Co. for ten items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. Approving Change Order No. 5 to Moved, seconded and duly carried: the plans and specifications for Contract Nos. 2-26-3, 2-28 and 2-29 That Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue (including City of Anaheim Street Improvements), Contract No. 2-26-3; Katella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street (Ninth Street), Contract No. 2-28; and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29, authorizing an addition of $140,000.00 to the contract with Steve Bubalo Construction Co., for payment of contract -specified bonuses for early completion of certain major elements of the project which minimizes public inconvenience and traffic safety hazards, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICTS 1 & 2 Actions re Draft Supplement No. 2 to Program EIR on Amendment No. 1 to the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan re Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30 Verbal report of staff The Director of Engineering reported that in 1989 the Directors approved the comprehensive, updated Districts' wastewater management program and master plan which provided for facilities necessary to meet flow increases and regulatory discharge requirements for the next 30 years. Also approved was a program environmental -30- 12/11/91 impact report (EIR) which addressed most of the master -planned projects. Contract No. 2-30, Memory Lane Interceptor, is a Districts 1 and 2 project which has significantly changed since the Master Plan and EIR were approved, thus requiring additional CEQA environmental review. In July 1991, the Directors initiated the process by receiving the Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment, and authorizing the preparation and circulation of Draft Supplement No. 2 to the Program EIR on Amendment No. 1 to the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan for the Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract r No. 2-30, in compliance with CEQA requirements. A copy of the Draft Supplement No. 2 to the EIR and a Staff Summary of it, and comments on the Notice of Preparation and the Draft were received at the November Board meeting. He further reported that the actions appearing on the agenda for consideration are to receive and file any comments received on Draft Supplement No. 2 to the EIR, and hold the public hearing. Following the hearing, the consultant, Boyle Engineering Corp./K. P. Lindstrom, Inc., should be directed to address any oral comments and written comments received, and to prepare the Final Supplement No. 2 to Program EIR for Amendment No. 1 to Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan re Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30, incorporating the comments and responses thereto. The public comment period closes December 31, 1991. Public Hearing The Chairman announced that this was the time and place fixed by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 and 2 for a public hearing relative to any written or oral comments received on the Draft Supplement No. 2 to Program EIR on Amendment No. 1 to the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan relative to the Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30 Open public hearing The Chairman declared the✓ hearing open at 9:58 p.m. Receive and file written comment Moved, seconded and duly re Draft Supplement No. 2 to EIR carried: That the written comment relative to Draft Supplement No. 2 to Program EIR on Amendment No. 1 to the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan relative to the Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Close hearing There being no oral public comments, the Chairman declared the hearing closed at 9:59 p.m. Directing consultant to address That the consultant be, and is written comments received on Draft hereby, directed to address any Supplement No. 2 to EIR and prepare written or oral comments received Final Supplement No'. 2 after close on the Draft Supplement No. 2 to of the comment period on said EIR and to prepare the Final December 31, 1991 Supplement No. 2 to Program Environmental Impact Report on Amendment No. 1 to the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan relative to the Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30, after the close of public comment period on ^ December 31, 1991. -31- 12/11/91 DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:59 p.m., December 11, 1991. 1991. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment _ That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:59 p.m., December 11, 1991. 0 Secretary of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 '�.� -32- m x =-I FUND hC 9199 • JT GIST 1(RKING CAPITAL FPOCESSING DATE 10/30/91+PAGE ` . REPORT NUMBER AP43 VkU SALTATION DISTRICTS OF CRANLE`C.QUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11/06/91 POSTING OATS 11/06/91 HKAHI Rue VF,.I'UOR AgO.UjyT DESCRIPTION 117944 ACGIH9 INC. $43.52 PUBLICATION 117945 ASA ANALYSIS S112g10P ___ENGINE OIL ANALYSIS 117946 ACCURATE METALLURGICAL SERVICE $10950.00 ALUMINUM & STAINLESS STEEL TESTING 117947 ACVANCO (CNS7AUC70RS IRC $19420980200" CONSTRUCTION P1-34-3, P1-35-2 117948 AMER SCCIETY OF CIVIL ENGR 330y.��___.__PUBLICATIONS 117949 AMER SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGR 5345.0P TRAINING REGISTRATION 117950 ANTHEM LIFE INSURANCE $149000.00 STOP LOSS INSURANCE 117951 RCBCO IhC a/OR AMERICAN SEAES 3936.-a9 VALVE PARTS 117952 ARAHEIM SEWER CCNSTRUCTICN _------ $49916.25 SEWER REPAIRS DIST 2 117953 BLAKE P ANDERSCh S59.67 TELEPHONE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 117954 ANGELUS FACIFIC CO �i59.]q OFFICE SUPPLIES 117955 ANTHONY$S MECH & MACHINE• INC. i444.30 MACHINE REPAIRS 117956 APCO VALVE R FRIMER CORP $111.55 VALVE 117957 A-PLLS SYSTEMS 126.12 NOTICES & ADS 117958 ARATEX SERVICES INC 189506.64 UNIFORM RENTALS 117959 AMSA S150.70 TRAINING REGISTRATION 11T960 BC ANALYTICAL S5tg52.QQ LAB SERVICES 117961 FALCCN DISPOSAL SERVICE S1069414.42 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.7=13-88 117962 P.ACKFL06 PREVENTION DEVICE 5192.00 BACKFLOW TESTING 117963 FANAhA eLLEPRINT S3_26U.3E BLUEPRINTING SERVICES 10-10-90 117964 BARCLAYS LAW PUBLISHERS 5284.9E PUBLICATIONS 117965 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS INC S39815.31 LAB SUPPLIES 117966 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES INC. IM.,2.0__ _ _ WASH COUPONS 117967 BEARD/PROVENCHER 9 ASSOC INC S500.0P -_CAR FLOW TESTING SERVICES 117968 RERTECH S525.96 INSTRUMENT PARTS 117969 BLASILS ELECTRIC TRUCK INC. $135s50 TRUCK PART 117970 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP S319492.76 ENGINEERING SERVICES 14-1, J-17 1179T1 BROWN 9 CALDWELL CONSULTING 1309729.83 ENGINEERING SERVICES P2-23-5, P2-35-2,3,4 117972 SAVE BUBALO CON $7 U U-tON CO 559tAll t47 CONSTRUCTION M.0.9-11-91 117973 BUILEERtS EMPORIUM S207.82 _ RARDWARE/LUMBER 117974 TPE BUREAL CF NATIONAL AFF S59.67 PUBLICATIONS 117975 GARY G STREED S317.3.25 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 117976 CS COMFANY S41.02 VALVE 117977 CAL -GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. S44.9P LAB SUPPLIES 117978 CALTROL INC }---- MECHANICAL PARTS 117979 CAIPELRA i225.0P CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 1179FO CALoS CAMEPAS9 INC. S196.44 CAMERA 117981 CAPITAL WESTWARD S244.27 REGULATOR 117982 JOHN CARCLLO ENGINEERS S1909168.29 ENGINEERING SERVICES 11-17; I=9, PI-36 117983 CENTURY SAFETY INST & SUFP 5830.82 SAFETY SUPPLIES 1179e4 DICK CEPEK_INC S54.74 TRUCK PARTS ll79e5 CHRCPE CFANKEHAFT INC i360.00 -` MECHANICAL REPAIRS 117986 CIAO BELLA CATERING S779.3q DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSE 117987 CLEMENT COMMUNICATIONS INC 553.9_Q SUBSCRIPTION 117988 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT S112.42 SAFETY SUPPLIES 117989 COLICH AhO SONS $1399200.00 CONSTRUCTION I-9 rTl x s--s t7d D I N FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WCRKING CAPITAL FPOCESSING DATE 10/3G/Q1 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DIS ILLCIS_OF OUhGE_CQUN71'______—_..____..._ ' CLAIMS PAID 11/06/91 POSTING DATE 11/06/91 _. WARRANT NO, DjR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ' 117990 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA S7.5P5.32 PUMP PARTS 0 8.-- INSTRUMENT PARTS - ' 117992 CONNELL FM PARTS / CIY 113R.50 50 TRUCK PARTS ' 117993 CCN•\AY ►ESTERN EMFRESS 346.71 FREIGHT CHARGES •117994 CONSOLIDAIfn ELECTRICAL —DIRT i� �T0�79 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 0 117995 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC S3.026.49 TMLS " 117996 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO S8.566.14 CHLORINE M.0.10-11-89 117997 R•S ROCK STORE =7s�gL PUBLICATION " 117998 CCSTA rESA AC7C SUPPLY —_ _ S35.62 TRUCK REPAIR " 117999 CCUNCIL CN EDUCATICN $350.01 TRAINING REGISTRATION e 118000 EHIC1lL_P_ROCESSOBS-1kC i2•➢72..63 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 118001 HORNET F•OLNDATION INC _ _ $160.88 MANUALS 118002 DAMES R MCCAE $2.176*02 GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES ro = • 59 q &lg VALVE " 118004 OECUS S690.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 10 118005 DEZURIK AND/CR CS CO S192.92 HARDWARE 2' C POLYMERS =3 •.831.38_ CHEMICALS IIFOOT DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $54.95 PRINTING ?) 218008 OCRACC ENTERPRISES INC $550600 PLANT MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS " 5➢6.D5 GRIT LIFT n 118010 0•YALS SALES 1245.88 FITTINGS '• 118011 ERCE SAN OIEGO S1.900.00 LAB SERVICES " 118012 STFAN_1NC iba130.86 OFFICE SUPPLIES a 118013 EMERALD SYSTEMS S590.09 OFFICE EQUIPMENT » 118014 ENCHANTER INC 349900.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.7-17-91 '0128015 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSQC s2."55 _Q LAB SERVICES 118016 ENVIRONMENTS WEST INC S2.700.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES u 110017 FACILITIES SUPPORT CO 3101.4E TOOLS nSTEIN PE Sa•.20Q.06_____—CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-4, J-7-5 s, 118019 FEDERAL EMPRESS CORP $628.75 AIR FREIGHT ss 118020 FERRELLGAS S25.52 PROPANE >e118021 FISCHER R PCRTER CO CHLORINATION PARTS 118022 FLICKINGER CO 31.301.T7 VALVE '• 118023 FLC•SYSTEPS S2.269.48 PUMP PARTS z,llea24 IFF[RC A FCPKERT ENGINEERING SERVICES M.0.6-12-91 .0 118025 FOXBCRO CC / FAG SYSTEMS S2.00 FREIGHT 4' 118026 FREOSON PV SUPPLY 345.73 TRUCK PARTS. .i 0 7 AM19NL—LVL'BER CO HARDWARE/LUMBER a 11802R GENERAL IELEPHCRE CO $3.744.39 TELEPHONE SERVICES " 118029 GECREE LEECH R ASSOCIATES S329:19 ELECTRIC PARTS EELU-C 111SI-ELL_1-A-C $2 1471•;r MECHANICAL PARTS to 118031 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $489.35 FILM•- 116032 GREAT PACIFIC EQUIPMENT CO. 3454.77 TRUCK PARTS u H�CIL'EPSIY s1•P3.4.4�_.._-- CHEMICALS 'e 118034 HARRINGTCA INCUSTRIAL FLASTI 16.324.07 VALVES & HARDWARE so e, u s, Its 118035 HELGA PASS sl•800.0n DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL se v i m X 00 D I W FUND NC 9199 - JT DIST Y(RKING CAPITAL CLAIMS PAID 11/06/91 POSTING PROCESSING DATF 19/3t/91»fAGF REPORT NUHPF.R AP43 R.ANGL_COUNT DATE 11/06/91 118036 PL FAWK CO INC S79.33 118037 HIL 1 INC .A10.9A 11803R HOERBIGER CVS CALIF INC $721.30 118039 J.T. HORVATH 9 ASSOC. S39000.0P llp040 HOUSE OF BATTERIES s756.56---_.- _-_ ._ 118041 RS HLGF-ES CC INC $657#16 11PO42 HUMBCL07 STATE UNIVERSITY S67.35 llP043 HUNTER LOflEDRATION 118044 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH S189014.25 11R049 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STA S121.01 11R046 "UK1ThGICR sligpi Y S241.36—........ IIE047 HLNYINGICK VALLEY SCHYINK C S192.92 11E04B HYDRACOK CCMPANY S577-95 11A049 i_G. INDUSTRIAL CnRP- S5a258.53—_`_______ 118050 IMO INDUSTRIES S559.19 118051 ISCC INC S99939.g4 IIAn52 TPPE AIAL hEST CHEPTCAI S40a.723.27___—__ 118053 INDUSTRIAL TP-READED PRCCUCTS 519861.47 118054 INGRAM PAFER S82.75 IIR0S5 INSIDE F.F.A. t760- 0-0 __ 118056 INTRONICSv INC. S302.90 1100R7 GREAT 6ESIERN SANITARY SUPP S950.59 11A059 DAWIP JLAKl.BS I ASSnC INC s3.983.65 118059 JENSEN 70OLS INC S127.63 118060 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 1664.99 IfA0F1 EARlr P .1DRGiMSEN tl6316.84 118062 KEN BERRY FRCEUC71ONS 519420.00 11BOEJ KALLEENIS CCMFUTER PROCLCTS S207.15 11ARF4 KANER CDr.P_Ahy sB.DA 118065 KAR PRODUCTS S343.25 118066 KELLY SERVICES S1,905.65 1180F7 KING —AEAMG INC t875.-24—__ T. 118068 KLEIKFELCER S39234.77. 118069 KKCX IKCLSIRIAL SUFPLIES S3034.92 1fA070 PLRi1K_K.CAD.ICK_SR--__--. -S2a893.40--------_ --- 11P071 LA LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS S935.39 1180)72 LEE R RC CONSULTING ENGR S9.982.00 118n73 1E RCY E-PAACALt lt__ASSOC t110.00_-_.____.__—_...._ IIF074 LIFECCM-SAFE7Y SERVICE SUPFL S275.00 118075 THE cOHK LINER ORGANIZATION SR7.QC 11RM79 I DRAIN—P_RODUCIS _ i1P077 MBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL S400.0c 118078 MPS S310.PL .UP 070 PACOFCO I1B000 MAGNETEK KATICNAL ELECTRIC S707.2n 1180l1 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS INC 33.543.4n DESCRIPTION INSTRUMENT PARTS TOOLS MECHANICAL PARTS CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, J-7-4 BATTERIES BUILDING MATERIALS PUBLICATION CONSTRUCTION J-19-1 _.WAFER USE OFFICE SUPPLIES HARDWARE BICI'CLE PARTS LAB SUPPLIES CHEMICALS ELECTRIC SUPPLIES BATTERY FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-14-90 CONNECTORS PAPER PRODUCTS SUBSCRIPTION --COMPUTER SOFTWARE JANITORIAL SUPPLIES TRAINING REGISTRATION TOOL _ _ ELECTRIC SUPPLIES METAL --VIDEO PRODUCTION OFFICE SUPPLIES TOOLS _'BUILDING MATERIALS TEMPORARY SERVICES MACHINE SUPPLIES --GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES TOOLS CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PUMP PARTS ENGINEERING SERVICES ENGINEERING SERVICES -CYLINDER REPAIRS SUBSCRIPTION SERVICE AGREEMENT LAB SERVICES PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES MAINTENANCE CONTRACT ELECTRIC MOTORS MECHANICAL PARTS I-9 P1-33 m X z w FUND NC 9199 - JT CIST WCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1013n/91 rAGF 4 REPORT NUMBER. AP43 UAIX-SAI1I?ALION Q.LSTAICTS nr noAN E-CO NTY ' a CLAIMS 6 U - PAID II/06/91 POSTING DATE 11/06/91 a "nOR AMOUNT e 118062 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $40A.89 °liersit C&ARf4X-CNTRAJ�T-YPEYR1lER 1 9928v81- --- 118084 MCKENNA ENGR 9 EQUIP s69390.h5 118085 do MIDLAND MFG CORP $173.75 ° 118087 MINE SAFETY APFLIAhCE.S CC 14.6P4.1R 118088 PISSICN AERASIVE SUPFLIES 11°230.31 2 APES--lL_-CAJ-GLRERY 439743.14-------- ----- 13 118090 JAMES M MONTGOMERY S39062.07 1. 118091 MONTROY SUPPLY CO $64.93 's OORE-�RCOUC-TS-CO --i19?-.A7---------- -- - to 118093 PORTCN SALT ANC/OR S459.34 of 11e094 MCYICN IACUSTRIES INC S760.39 to RGI A _ CELWLAR SERVICES It19-7.56 __ -- 118096 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES INC S2.370.00 70 118097' NATICNAL TECHNICAL INFCRMATI $55.50 }1 USX-K_ REYBERG _CORST CO 1564-9.450.97----- -----•.----.- 77 118099 CI7Y OF NEWPCRT BEACH $8.25 }° 118100 O#BRIEN EAERGY SYSTEMS s109485.03 2' r�rucATIONpi WIRTON SrRvICrs 4409.14 25 - 118102 OFFICE PAVILION/INTERIOR RES ----_ s949.06 118103 ON SYSTEMS CO S389995.23 " RANGE--C(Uh7V C!'-E"CAl CO 2° 118105 ORANGE CCUNTY .FARM SUPPLY C s312.41 2' 118106 OXYGEN SERVICE Sl•459.32 70 IIA107 COUNTY OF ORANGE -S4*444-3G- -- - 118108 COUNTY SANITAIICN DISTRICT 1695P6.17 sa I1P109 PSCCIPOCL SUPPLY OF OC1 $95.70 33ligila _ACIf_IC-t.CB-ILE--CFFICEc -_S.78Z.36--------_---- - N 118111 PACIFIC CARTS $2.012.43 26 119112 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO $19941.66 CIFSC-FELL---------- 118314 PACTEL CELLULAR s224.05 1° 118115 PACTEL A'ERIDIAN SYSTEMS $77.28 S°11AIIA PAK--WES-T _ - 12.178.-7-1- ------ -_ -_. '0 118117 PARAGON CABLE S28.36 " 118118 PEAT FARWICK MAIN 9 CO S5.000.00 '211811g REAGAMON TRESS -INC -S295.00.------------ - '2 118120 PERSONNEL JCURNAL s50.0(' " 118121 PIMA GRC SYSTEMS INC $1009522.35 's PI.TNEY__BEWES '0 118123 POLYMETRICS• INC. $10718.88 " 118124 POLYPURE INC S27.98405 eI I R175 PCUE R-IRA.CK NL - -191.21--.-----. -.--- .. " 118126 PARCLC FRIPRCSE ICE $231.00 S0 116127 s, PRCFESSICRAL SERVICE IND. s49272.00 ss ss M 51 C DESCRIPTION INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES OFFICE MACHINE PUMP PARTS CHLORINATION PARTS INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES SAFETY SUPPLIES HARDWARE ENGINEERING SERVICES ENGINEERING SERVICES M.0.6-13-06 OFFICE SUPPLIES INSTRUMENT PARTS SALT MECHANICAL PARTS CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES VACUUM SERVICES PUBLICATION CONSTRUCTION P1-33 WATER USE INTERIM POWER GEN. SYST. M.0.3-8-89 SAFETY GLASSES -bFFfCE FURNITURE CHLORINE M.0.2-14-90 CHEMICALS LAN6ICAPIN� SUPPLIES SPECIALTY GASSES DATA PROCESSING SERVICES REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES MOBILE OFFICE REPAIRS INSTRUMENT PARTS SAFETY SUPPLIES TELEPHONE SERVICES CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS JANITORIAL SUPPLIES CABLE SERVCIES AUDITING SERVICES M.0.3-13-91 SUBSCRIPTION SUBSCRIPTION RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 POTAGE METER LEASE EQUIPMENT RENTALS CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-87 PUMP PARTS ICE - SOIL TESTING FUND _MC 9'199 - JT 01ST u{RKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATF 1U/3C/91 FAGE� REFORT NUMBER AP43 CSUNTY 5Afy_]_]m.CH DIS1_g_1_CT5 OL_pRANG"oUNLT-_____ CLAIMS PAID 11/06/91 POSTING DATE 11/06/gl VENDOR _ AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 118128 THE FRO%ECT SCLU71ONS CO. s4972O,0O 11P129 QUALITY IUILDING 5"4 LY 118130 QUARTERDECK OFFICE SYSTEMS S448.83 118131 RAININ INSTRUMENT CD.• INC S632.65 118132 RECYC_IYC S��r32g,93_ -- 11A133 POCC CORF It RECLINE ENT s1H0.on 2IR134 RED VALVE CC lAC s745.41 118135 RED WING SHOES S120.64 118136 REMEDY TEMP __ $49881.73� 11F1!7 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CC 119403.95 11813_R J R ROBERTS _ t.324o861.9Q _... 11P139 J R RCBERIS CCRP S54919o.n0 118140 LAURENCE L ROSINE CO $1,322.00 118141 ROYCE INSTRUMENT S67.18 118142 RYAN-HERCC S331.76 118143 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP S161.50 11P144 SAFETY SUPPLY OF AMER CA s449.96 __ _- 218145 SARTCRI4S CORP S36B.00 118146 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS IN79L $709401.06 118147 SECURITY SPECIALISTS =L52315.182_ 118146 SHAMROCK SUPPLY S568.83 118149 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO $1003.33 118150 SKYPARK BALK -IN MECICAL CLI S1058,p40_ 118151 SLIDE MASTER 1244.74 118152 SMITH -EMERY CO S8,174.00 118153 SNAP-CN COLS_ CORP_ s?ill.A2 118t54 COMPUSAr INC. S775.02 118155 St CCAST AIR CLALITY S7o000.00 118156 SOUTH COAST PATER i8jr_59 _ 118157 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO S11.310.7U 118158 SO CAL GAS CO S616.02 118159 THE TRANE CCPFANY nj544._1.r L11r1E0 SCL'714ERN CCLNIIES CIL CC S14070.65 lielfil SOUVENIR FI-070 S234.57 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91 BUILDING MATERIALS -- COMPUTER SOFTWARE LAB SUPPLIES RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.3-13-91 STREET SWEEPING PLUMBING SUPPLIES SAFETY SHOES - TEMPORARY SERVICES VALVE PARTS CONSTRUCTION J-17 CONSTRUCTION J-23-1 FLOORING INSTALLATION e INSTRUMENT PARTS FITTINGS PARTS CLEANER SAFETY SUPPLIES LAB SERVICES OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-12-91 SECURITY EQUIPMENT ELECTRIC SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES PHYSICAL EXAMS PRESENTATION AIDS SOIL TESTING 7-17-91 TOOLS -'COMPUTER HARDWARE/SOFTWARE PERMIT FEES WATER USE - - POKER NATURAL GAS ELECTRIC PARTS - .. DIESEL FUEL PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES WELDING SUPPLIES 119163 STAR TOOL t SUPPLY CO S686.4r. -TOOLS 118164 STERLING ART S51.4P ART SUPPLIES 118165 SUMMIT S1EEL S354.49 METAL 1181EE SUNSET FORD 1154.73 - TRUCK PARTS 118167 SYSTAT $550.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 118168 SYSTEMS_EhHANCEMENI CORP. 5904.00_ COMPUTER SOFTWARE 118169 TECH SYSTEMS __" s1,294.U1 - TRUCK PARTS 11P170 TELE-CELLr INC 11*015.35 TELEPHONES 11R171 THOMFSON 1KOUSTRIAL :UFFLY S2 2_9,6s05 HARDWARE 112172 TRAVEL TRAVEL _ $19116.50 TRAVEL SERVICES M.0.6-12-91 11P173 TRUCK 9 AUTO SUPPLY INC S119129.54 TRUCK PARTS FUND NC 9199 - JT OTFT ►CPKING CAPITAL FPOCFSSING DATE I0/30/91 FAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 VNIL-EANI-TA-1ION_DLST$1LIS_DE_QRANGE`COUNTT ___ ' r CLAIMS PAID 11/06/91 POSTING DATE 11/06/91 'UARPANI Nce VEI,&Cp —.AMOUNT_ ' 118114 TUSTIN DCOGE $360.93 'IIA1715 1W119ING—LA@_ORAIORIES OF _- 1258.'L0_____ ' 118176 UNITED NCTTINGHAM 2215.50 ' 118177 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $508063 'Ij MR US__fiCVEPNCENLROCKSLTCRE It60.80_--.--.--' — 10 II8119 VWR SCIEA7IFIC 199114.93 " 118180 VALIN CORPORATION S73.93 _ALLEyEll-IF -, SUPPLY [0 s 12s541,63 " 118182 VANIER GPAPHICS 9536.6n 118183 RCSEfCURT INC 13s814.35 " A.R111►__lA!LT-TICAL_iNSIRUCAI 14.518.2E_ '• 118185 VERNCA PALING COMFANY 12s575.00 " 118186 VERTEX SYSTEMS 119365.04 • GIADU.SIRIAL—SUPPLY " 1181HB VILLAGE AURSERIES 131.25 10 118189 VINCENT TPUCAE & TH£ LAW 149000.0C " WJI.RP_EN.—L—tQ —555 9 ■ 4 6 ___..-- .---..... _ .. _ 01 116191 WESTERN MIGNWAY PRCOUCTS IN 15s286.74 " 118192 WESTERN SIATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY 137s591.09 118193 E5C_O -- �24fl.26_--__-- " 118194 ROURNE A WOODRUFF S70s792.55 '• 11815y ILrRcx CARP S5s212.01 rr 11figa ZTFAARTh I ALPPRJC.S. AAPER- 118197 r 21EBARTH AND ALPER 13469432.50 ................. " TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 11/06/91 $597159153435 --=-=-=°O=°=0 7 n >t M ]7 " dr as u "T .9 w a� ss sr DESCRIPTION TRUCK PARTS SOIL TESTING RENTAL EQUIPMENT PARCEL SERVICES PUBLICATIONS LAB SUPPLIES MECHANICAL PARTS FITTINGS PAPER MECHANICAL PARTS LAB SUPPLIES PAVING SERVICES DIST 2 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT SAFETY SUPPLIES LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES LIABILITY CLAIM LIABILITY CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR SAFETY SUPPLIES CAUSTIC SODA M-0.8-8-90 ELECTRIC PARTS LEGAL SERVICES M.0.10=10=90 COPIER LEASES CONSTRUCTION P2-42-1 -CONSTRUCTION PI-34-I c FUND NO 9199 — JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCE33ING DATE 10/3f ' REPORTNUMBER A COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY • e CLAIMS PAID 11/06/91 POSTING DATE 11/06/91 • SUMMARY .e AMOUNT Al OPER FUND $308.40 � 2 OPER FUND ;8,665_25 A2 CAP FAC FUND $9,778.10- --- A3 OPER FUND $56,244.58 is #3 CAP FAC [RIND $J0,833.30 it A5 OPER FUND $920.19 A6 OPER FUND $235.41 1e 6 CAP FAC FUND $2,249.57 • A7 OPER FUND $3,792.30 70 A7 CAP FAC FUND $8,060.05 11 OPER FUND _$984.56 n All CAP FAC FUND ;35,817.72 n A13 OPER FUND $63.66 44 14 OPER FUND $9 . 67 is A14 CAP FAC FUND $9,245.20 A5&6 OPER FUND 4,001.45 •f 5&6 CAP FAC FUND $15.91 x A6&7 OPER FUND $2, 162.26 •• A7&14 OPER FUND $24.92 �• JT OPER FUND $703,736.57 71 CORF , 670, 497 .93—--------- SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $29,544.13 >s JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $147,962.22 34 INS -------------- $5,705,153.35 37 se s. .3 f .e N Y !0 L s: s. 55 se sr /91 PAGE 7 P43 I/ m X t7d C7d I F� FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WCRKING CAPITAL WARRANT NO. VENDOR PROCESSINn GATE. 11/13/91 PAGE RFPOPT NUFIREP AP43 --COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11/20/91 POSTING DATE 11/20/91 AMOUNT 11P225 AM E'EST COMPANY 591.59 -118226------ AI - -$ -i -- $29607.U1 118227 A T 8 T $1.396.71 118228 ACTION DOUR REPAIR CORP S69585.UC 118229 AEROCHFM INC $475.99 1IF230 AIR FRODLCTS R CHEMICAL IN S48t522.0C 1IF231 AIRWAY SCALE CCMPAKY 1295.41 11aE,3?-- - -- ALBERTSChIS FCDO-BTR - - S99667 11P233 ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY CO LTD S3r679.93 118234 ALLEN-BRACLEY $613.91 118235 ALPHAGA7 $532627 118236 ALLIED LICFTIAG 1373.1:8 118237 ALPHA EETA CO 044 $341.52 11$238 AMER lGA-G14864#1G--A--4G8MM --- ---- ---.-.-._ $411.89 118239 AMERICAN ELECTRONICS S1904U.28 118240 ROCCO INC R/OR AMERICAN SEALS S49648.93 SIP241 .-ANAHEIM CCMMERCE CTR S369.79 118242 ANAHEIM EXTRUSION CO INC S146.74 118243 AKAHEIM FILLS AUTO HOCY $173.76 44-8,2.44 A. AMFim p.Gf-FFsiehAk: Rt$1--- ---51p087.22 - 118245 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTICh $19809.64 118246 APPLIED FILTRATION $10913.00 118247 AQUARIAN COATINGS %112.D3 118248 ARATEX SERVICES INC S155.113 118249 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $728.46 4-1-F450 8E*T-At--l-NSURANGE-G$NfU64.-- 118251 AUDIC VIIEC REFCRTING SERVI $190.53 118252 AUTOMOBILE CLUB CF SO CAL $740.40 118253 PRG COIN -OP LAUNDRY 1721.25 IIS254 BAF INCUSTRIES 1324.27 1182F5 RFP TRANSFCR7 CYNAPICS CCRF $19571.46 41-8256 f-A"(;h-0-ISP-C&AL SLAY ICE---- --- - S154v186.19 - 118257 BABCOCK DISPLAY PRODUCTS IN S2*747.14 119258 BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE $32.A0 118259 BALI HAT HOTELS S302.65 118260 BANCROFI- �IIITNEY CO S112.21 1IF261 TOM EARPCh GAS CHLORINATION: S1r910.0t+ 11F2Lt2---•••_ •BAXTER CIAGNOSTICS IKC $8r018.70 118263 PEATRICE/HUNT WESSON ADM1N S199273.39 118264 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $11.876.33 118265 RENNETT-RCWEN $231.67 IIF2E( HEPRYDALE TRAILFF VILLA Sft14.E5 1182E7 WT EILLAPD INC S43.2.1 118268--•------ BLACKSHIF COMPUTER SYSTEMS $69446.86 118269 PCYLE EK(IhEERINC CCRF S74o480.92 118270 BREA CCPPLNITY FOSPITAL S591198.2F` DESCRIPTION PUBLICATION LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES DOOR REPAIRS REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN SYST M.0.8-9-89 TRUCK SCALE REPAIR REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT MANHOLE COVERS REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT SPECIALTY GASES BUILDING MATERIALS REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT COMPUTER PARTS REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT HARDWARE REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT - ---- - -- - - REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT -- SEWER REPAIRS DIST 7 PILLOW PLUG REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT UNIFORM RENTALS INSTRUMENT PARTS -- ------ DENTAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION. . PUBLICATION REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT - RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.7-13-88 - REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT BACKFLOW TESTING REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT PUBLICATION WATER SYSTEM CHLORINATION LAB SUPPLIES REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT HARDWARE REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT TRUCK PARTS OFFICE EQUIPMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-30 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT UND NC 9199 ,- JT DIST WCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING LATE 11/1?/91 REPORT NUMBER AI'43 - ---- -- ------ -- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11/20/gl POSTING DATE 11/211/91 WARRANT NO- VENCOR 118271 BREA HOSPITAL -118272--------- BRIANIS COIN -OP LAUNDRY 118273 BRINDERSON COPP 11P274 P.RITHINEE ELECTRIC 11p275 BRCWN R CALCWFLL CONSULTING 118276 HRUNS61CK CEFENSE 118277 STEVE BUBALO CONSTPUCTION CO ------BUILDER IS EMPORIUM----------. __---_---. --- -- 118279 ThE PUREAL CF NATIONAL AFF IIH280 THE BURKE CCMPANY 118281 BURKE ENGINEERING CO 118282 GARY G STREED 11A2R3 CS COMPANY 118284 GA04-LLAG--FLATUNG 118285 CALTRCL INC 1182P6 JOHN R CALAPRICE PHU 1182P7 CALIFORNIA TAMPAYEPS* ASSOC. 11828B CALIF WOCDWORKING MACHINERY IIF289 CAL'S CAPFRAS9 INC. G A RR -ER A--C C M•R ERA F*1- GAR- 118291 CENTRAL FCIRT SCFTbARE INC. 118292 WA CHARNSTROM CO 118293 CHEMICAL SERVICES INC IIA294 CLARK CONSULTANTS 1IF295 CCASTAL CCPMUNITIES HOSPITAL 118296---- -THE C0c_2---6RCHF ---- ---- -- ------ 118297 COILS UNLIMITED 118298 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO 118299 COMMERCIAL DOOR OF O.C.• INC. 118300 COMPRESSOR COMPCNENTS CF CA 118301 COPPLTEP BAY -- _110302--- -- GCMHL'SERVE- 118303 CONNELL CM PARTS / DIV 118304 CONSCLTOATED FLFCTRICAL DIST 118305 CCNTINENTAL AIR TOCLS INC 118306 CCNTINENIAL CHEMICAL CC 118307 CONTINUOUS COATING ---I18308 - CONTRACTORIS BOOK STORE. ! 11830g. CONVERSE CONSLLTANTS n C 110310 CCRE-ROSICN FRCOUCTS 118311 CCSTA MESA AUTC SUPPLY IIS312 COUNTY INVESTMENTS 118313 COUNTY WF•CLE'SALE ELECTRIC J- -- 1IS314 CREST COATING INC 118315 CIISTCM ENFMELERS INC ! 118316 EPFLCYMENT DEVELCPPFNT CFFT I AGE AMOUNT DESCHIPTION S297800P REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT S353.56 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT $1349651.51 CONSTRUCTION J-19-2 S49051.40 ELECTRIC PARTS $699766.61 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19 1298P9.24 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 12189835.(:" CONSTRUCTION 2-26-3, 2-28 -SgI121 HARDWARE S1.175.P;! PUBLICATION S42.78 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES SR7.2Q ELECTRIC SUPPLIES $69175.4,1 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT S71P.115 VALVES S19306.23 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT $219126.35 INSTRUMENT PARTS S99U65.36 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.11-14-90 $51.48 SUBSCRIPTION $19849.91 TOOL $371.55 CAMERA & FILM SI93006-0-- - - - - CARPETING $57.94 COMPUTER SOFTWARE S59.13 MAIL BAG E425.98 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT S2.164.n0 ENGINEERING SERVICES $29335.45 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT - $159.47 SUBSCRIPTION 5484.88 ELECTRIC PARTS $792.60 PUMP PARTS 1611.97 DOOR REPAIRS $195311.90 CHLORINATION PARTS S1gQg0.14 LAB SUPPLIES 1178.22 COMPUTER SERVICES $92.86 TRUCK PARTS $39310.62 ELECTRICAL PARTS 149564.54 TOOLS 13*426.45 CHLORINE. $430.39 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT S87.22 PUBLICATIONS S29954.90 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-17-91 S149.2', FREIGHT 1929.21 TRUCK PARTS S418.54 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT S1.293.11 INSTRUMENT PARTS $612.09 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 12g0.P5 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT S15n.83 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT b 091 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST YCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 11/11/01 IAGE 3 REPORT NUP-rick AI'4' -- - -- - --- --- -- - - COUNTY -SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11/20/91 POSTING DATE 11/2^/91 WARRANT NO, VENDOR AMOUNT DESCPIPTI(lN :[__� 118317 DAILY PTLCT $29243.25 NOTICES & ADS 11B318 --- - - DANIELS- TIRE SERVICE - - S510969 TRUCK PARTS 118319 OE ANZA CCRPORATION S150.0o EQUIPMENT RENTAL 118320 DEL MAR AVIONICS $115061 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT IIA321 DEZURIK AND/OR CS CO $619.33 VALVES 118322 DIATEC ENVIRCKPENTAL T39802.A5 CHEMICALS i1A323 DIFILIPFC ASSCCIATES T21Q.A1 PRINTING -148324 ------OIMITRI S RESTAURANT-----------._ --- -... -. _5511.97 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 118325 DISCO FRINT COMPANY $29833.34 PRINTING 118326 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC S1296R6.90 PLANT MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS 118327 DORR-CLIVER INC $329.27 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 1111328 DC�NEY#S ECILFR B WELCING R 1169520.bO BOILER REPAIRS 118329 DUNK ECWARDS CCRP $561.34 PAINT SUPPLIES 18330---- L'VNA&A&T-=----------- --- •-- -5976.52 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 119331 EDINGER CENTER $19164.39 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 1183!2 EDO CORPORATION $833.24 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT lIP333 E F HCUEHTON $973903 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 118334 EPA SERVICES INC $19601.32 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-23-2 118335 EASTFAN INC 529343.`•2 OFFICE SUPPLIES 18386---E69ANAL-YS;S---4N ---- -- --$49183a71 -- CONSULTING SERVICES 118337 EMERALD ISLE MOBILEHOME $29590.34 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT •116338 ENCHANTER INC S59390.IN0 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.7-17-91 lIP339 ENGRAVEPS INK CC S294.54 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 116340 F 8 W FROPERTIES $171.61 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 118341 FAIRWAY FORD SALES INC $306.12 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT -118342--- oOHN-$- FALKENSTEIN-PE---- ----- - - S39200.HJ- CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-4, I-9 110343 FARR SALES 8 SERVICE S09317*03 FILTERS 118344 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP S76.5t, AIR FREIGHT lIP345 FERRELLCAf $76.55 PROPANE 118346 CHEMWEST INC $29233.75 FIBERGLASS lIP347 FILTER SLPPLY CO S698.14 ENGINE PARTS -; 8348 F ISCHER-E F CR-TER -- CO------ - --- $39954.47 INSTRUMENT PARTS 118349 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO $19667.59 LAB SUPPLIES 118350 FLUID HAPDLING SYSTEMS S175.74 PUMP PARTS 118351 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY 5350.n0 PERMIT 118352 FOUNTAIN VALLEY FAINT $389.41 PAINT SUPPLIES 118353 FCX ENTERPRISES $19A25.01' SAFETY CONSULTING FGXPCRO CC /-- PAG SYSTEMS - S857.G9 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 118055 CITY OF FULLERTCN $89.61 WATER USE 118356 FULLERTON FOODS $760.43 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 11P357 GRC RESTALPANTS „23 S51Q.5` REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT .i 118350 GANAFL LLMBER CO 319196.33 BUILDING MATERIALS I11-359 GARCKER LIThCGRpFH $245.21 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT ----•• 118360 - GEP-C-LITE PLASTICS COFF $375.15 BUILDING MATERIALS 11P361 GENERAL IrLEFHONE CO S39A37.39 TELEPHONE SERVICES 118362 GIERLICH-V17CHELL INC 1389538.37 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES i 'i �1h0 NC 9199 JT GIST WCPKIKG CAPITAL WARRANT NO. VENDOR COUNTY -SANITATION -DISTRICTS OF. CLAIMS PAID 11/20/91 POSTING 118363 GORDONOS INC -1-8364 --GRA#B-SEATER-----------..---.__..._...._ 118365 GRAPFIC CISTRIPUTCRS 11R3E6 GREIF PRCTHERS INC 118367 HE TYPE 9 GRAPHICS 1IR368 HACH COMPANY 11R369 HAMILTON CO 1-183?0 ----HARMAN- PGPP-Ca -- 118371 HARTE-HAhKS COPFUNICATICNS I 118372 HALLA►AY CONTAINERS 110373 HIL71 INC 118374 HOERBTGER CVS CALIF INC 118375 J.T. HORVATH 6 ASSOC. 1-1-8376----NGUSE---6f-•---8A7-1ER IE6 - - 118377 PS HLGFE! CC INC 118378 HUNTINGTCA VALLEY TCCL - - 118379 -HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHWINN C » 118380 HYORACON COMPANY ' 118381 IEEE SERVICE CENTER - CP7 8 3 82---------14 ;- C-A RA (+-f tEF7A 1 C --- -- 118383 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL 118384 INDEPENDENT EXPLORATION 118385 INDEPENDENT FORGE CO 11P386 INDUSTRIAL THREACED PRCOUCTS 11P387 INGRAP PAPER - 118388- d NTEflSTATE--- ELECT 4)N•16•S- E GR P r------ - 118389 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT 118390 I 0 M CORP IIA391 JLA CREDIT CCRP 122352 GREAT �E;IERh SANI7ARY SUFF 118393 JAYOS CATERING b18.394 S-SUSFENSION--SER VI Cl-- - - - -- --- - 118395 JOHNSON CONTROLS BATTERY D1 118396 JOHNSON A HIGGINS 118397 JCHNSTONE SUPPLY 118358 KAR FRCCLCTS 118399 KING BEARING INC - 118400---• -•-- --KINNETIC - LAB -• INC { 118401 KONA KAI MOBILE HOME PARK 11,402 MARTIN KCRDICK SR lIP403 LA CELLLLAR TELEPHONE CC I•� 118404 JC ANN RF.ILLY 118405 LEARN KEY 118406-•- - --- LEASE -ALL •- LA FALPA 218407 LERNER FPCCESSING LAP 118408 LEWCO ELECTRIC CO FROCF.SSIN6 DATE 11/13/Q1 PAGE PEFORT NUMIJER 4F43 ORANGE COUNTY DATF 11/20/91 AMOUNT - -- DESCPIPTION $12.24 OFFICE SUPPLIES - ---S421.85-- - REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT . S790.8q FILM $372.43 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT S119.93 PRINTING S858.55 LAB SUPPLIES $81.92 LAB SUPPLIES - ---5445.63 - MECHANICAL PARTS $19356.31 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 53s510.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 11A4ong HARDWARE $49855061 COMPRESSOR PARTS 139CUO.Pr; CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, ----- S48.23 BATTERIES $29111686 SAFETY SUPPLIES SIA1.50 TOOLS S3v600.93 BICYCLES/PARTS S299.45 LAB SUPPLIES %164.24 PUBLICATION - - S39778.01 - - - - REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT $61.523.23 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-14-90 S31A.28 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 5338.82 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT S9nA.2° CONNECTORS 11950R.42 OFFICE SUPPLIES -- -- $69825.25 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT S72.64 WATER USE S19606.5P REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT $145032 MICROFICHE READER LEASE S19897.39 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES S526.OQ DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSES $100.66 TRUCK PARTS $29778.55 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT S59750.00 GROUP HEALTH CONSULTING S39629.6C TRUCK EQUIPMENT 53.77 FREIGHT $674.65 MACHINE SUPPLIES S18948D.Gb LAB SERVICES $59570.05 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT $29946.30 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 $597.04 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES $344.14 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT S204.85 PUBLICATION $59602.16. REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 1500.96 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT $259.03 TRUCK REPAIRS J-7-4 m X 2 ..I FUND NO WARRANT N0. VENDOR L PPOCESSING DATC 11/13/03 PAGF 5 REPORT NUMPER AF43 ------CGUhTY--SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11/20/91 POSTING DATE 12/20/92 119409 JAPES A LIRERIC 11-8410 -LIFET GM-SAFETY---SERV ICE - SUPFE-- ---- 118411 LIKE MFG CO 118412 LINCOLN CENTER MOBILE HOME 118413 LINKLETTER PROPEPTTES 116414 KP LINCSTROM INC 1IF415 LCS ALAMTICS GEAERAL FCSFIT --IIe416- SOCQ-EY*C£ -- CORP 118417 MPS 118418 MARVAC ELFCTRONICS 118419 CON PAUREP 1IF420 SCLTH STAR 118421 PCCOY SFEET METAL WORKS IN 184-22---MGKE-NNA--£NGR-B--E"4 --- 118423 MEnICAL ARTS EAST 118424 MICRCAGE COMPUTER 118425 MIDLAND MFG CORP 11R426 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO 118427 MISCC '-1184.26- : I-TGME"--F-A64F#G-&BNSTFUET6R6-- --- 118429 MCNITEK IhC 118430 MONITOR PUBLISHING CO lIP431 MONTGOMERY BROTHERS INC 118432 MCRTCN INTEP.NATICKAL INC 118433 MCTTCh IPCLSIRIES INC 118434-------•---NATIGhAL---FL-ANT-- SERVICES -IhC - - - - - "I 118435 NEUTRONIC •PLATING SERVICES 118436 NEVILLE CHEMICAL CO IIA437 NEW HERPES INC 1IF438 NFWPCRTICCSTA MESA YMCA IIF435 NCRIhROF CCRF-AIRCPAFT 1i8440 -----A1--GCRPCRATI9N.....__.. 118441 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES I 118442 OFFICE FAVILICN/INTERIOR RES 118443 OX SYSTEMS CC 118444 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C 119445 ORANGE CCUNTY FORM SUPFLY C -418446 - - -- .-ORANGE PRF.CISION-CIRCUITS - ,i 11R447 ORANGE VlLVE R FITTING CC. 118448 OXYGEN SERVICE 11R449 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 118450 COUNTY GF GRANGE „I 11P451 PACIFIC CIRCUITS SERVICES ----I184I12 •- - - .-PACIFIC-PCBILE CFF ICES I 128453 PACIFIC CL7LCCK SFORISL'EAR 118454 PACIFIC PLBLISHERS i AMOUNT $273.86 s135.n0 $101.25 $89334.11 $2r063.08 S2 002.2F+ 31U9217.8P -$818.Rb $68.96 $241.79 S4.659.U9 $67.12 5133.P7 ----- 5932.71 S558.23 $1939837.66 S2r7nl.96 S41.06 $134.41 ---S4661p606s80 $201.22 $123.00 $19356.40 S2.487.A7 S117.g2 %840.00 $106.19 S425.26 $347.67 $857.10 S2.J26.17 $353.25 $312.94 S1,848.94 427.421.R2 1118.94 $36n.1h SH7.69 1428.32 $3n5.86 $59758.93 $83.0J 3567.76 $523.25 S1.325.69 $58. 00 DESF.P.IPTION REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT CYLINDER REPAIRS REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT ENVIRO CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.10-10-90 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT JANITORIAL SUPPLIES PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES OCEAN MONITORING CONSULTANT PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES ELECTRIC PARTS PUMP PARTS REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT COMPUTER HARDWARE/SOFTWARE M.0.10-9-91 CHLORINATION PARTS SAFETY SUPPLIES OFFICE EQUIPMENT ------ CONSTRUCTION 7-11-2 INSTRUMENT PARTS SUBSCRIPTION LAB SUPPLIES REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT HARDWARE VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT HARDWARE REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT LAB SUPPLIES SAFETY GLASSES OFFICE FURNITURE CHLORINE M.0.2-14-90 TRUCK PARTS GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT FITTINGS SPECIALTY GASES REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE PERMITS REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT BUILDING REPAIRS REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT PUBLICATION l �l wkmxING CAPITAL PPOCESSIAG DATE 11/13/91 REPORT NUNI3F.P At 43 "UN41-&ANITAT I-GN-OIST-R4C-TS -OF-ORAN&E--EOUNTY WARRANT N0. CLAIMS PAID 11/20/41 POSTING DATE 11/20/91 118455 VENDOR AMOUNT 11946f PACIFIC SAFETY EOUIPPEAT CO S59714.65 118457-R4"E"EA19.1 -SY&FENS---------_---�__--_-- 184yg PAGENET S1r685.25-- 11845A PALM LOCGE MOBILE ESTATES S73.79 1184E0 r iYLERr 4IENEpr PALMIER! $59240.73 118461 FENTACYAE CIRCUITS IAC S59686.ln •41A462- - PHOTO 8 SOUND CO S799.QN --- p4-"-WICK- =---'-_----`-. -. PAPER•- S236.2b 1184E3 PIGRC SYS S INC - $103.44 184 .� 1184E-1 M4 PLAINS TRLEVALUEHARDWARE $839 r65.63 66 PLEICA CCRP J1p S55.99 1 17 POLYFURE INC $161.67 ---1118468._-_-__--_-_3468 POWDERCOAT SEPVICES 5169251.17 „ 128469 POWER _.E]EGTRC._..SUFPL-YtI00.3b--GO----..._._ 118470 HARCLC PRIMROSE ICE $213.45 PRCOLCTICN FLATING S196.0n ]1118471R47? THE PROJECT SCLUTIONS CO. 5976.01 RAINBOW CiSP$497211.00 118473 OSAI CO --118474 0ALFHS GRCCERY 471 21.36111.17 --- ""-RAY--Ah$-* E342.31 � 118475 DAYIC ! RAY As�OEIfi£-9-----I NCr-----•------•--�--S14r395aU�1 11R477 RECYC INC ASSIGNEE S23.44 ~ 1 118470 PBCC CORP 6 REbL;NE ENT S529897.33 tV 118479 ITDC- REGIONAL TRAINING CENTER s975.n0 I THE RECISTER S3r000.0n m 118480_..,____- ,fiEID---ME1*L...F}{t1.EHIN6 S49513o19 128481 REMECY TEMP - - $990042 i1A48? 118483 THE REPUELIC SUPFLY CO S19420.110 RESTEK CCRP $29490.37 12A9E4 ROCCOrS 1240.0U ]•1 1184P.5 TRUCK 4PECKING RCSEMCUAT INC - VAREC DIV 1134.69 - 11A486•_.__ _- ,f 11A4R7 RGYAL -- LhClESALE_ ELECTRIC $586.37 S&G TUBE - $148.70 118488 SAFFTYwKLEEN CORD $116.93 11A4Ag SAFETY SUPPLY OF AMERICA 180.75 118450 SAACCA ENGINEERING INC SA2.31 11A491 SAYE? CCFFCRATICA 521P$43.9 118492�-. ^1 --- -._. _ _ 118493 SCOT SPECIALTY- GASES INC 11849543.5 SEA -BIRD ELECTRONICS INC S568.92 I18495 SEA COAST DESIGPJS $387.01, SEApS $751.52 IIA4y6 ROEP.UCK d rC S467.86 118497 SENSCREtt IAC SHAMROCK SUPPLY 15R5.24 «� 2A498- __._SHERATpN.ANAH $3r493.66 118499 EIM HOTEL 118500 SHUR LGK CORD 13.092.39 SILICCN SYSTEFS IAC 3744.A2 ��. 311r969.2t DESCRIPT]ON PAGE SAFETY SUPPLIES TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS - EQUIPMENT LEASE REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT LEGAL SERVICES - OIL WELLS REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT RADIO JANITORIAL SUPPLIES RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 HARDWARE REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-87 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT ELECTRIC SUPPLIES ICE REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91 TRASH REMOVAL REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT PHOTOGRAMMETRIC MAPPING SERVICES REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.3-13-91 STREET SWEEPING SERVICES TRAINING REGISTRATION NOTICES & ADS REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT TEMPORARY SERVICES INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES TRAINING REGISTRATION TRUCK PARTS REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT ELECTRIC PARTS REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT PARTS CLEANER JANITORIAL SUPPLIES SEWER REPAIRS DIST 2 COMPUTER SOFTWARE LAB SUPPLIES LAB EQUIPMENT OFFICE MACHINES LAB FREEZER INSTRUMENT PARTS HARDWARE REFUND USER FEE OVERP"' REFUND USER FEE REFUND USER -- DESCRIPTION -1 yARRANt N0. CLAIMS PAID 11/29/9i rip aIS." VENCOR AMOUNT SILVERI & LE BCUEF IlaF41 iFi11FJY--iEAVEN -RE3f"ANT--'-------- SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL 118503 `CLI SLIDE MASTER 118504 SMITIa-EMEFY CC 11A505 SMITH FIFE 8 SUPPLY IRC 118506 SNAP -ON TOOLS CORP 11850T _-- -�44856H----.� SO CGAST AIR QUALITY. 1.18509 SOUTFERN CALIF EDISON CC 11P510 SO- CAL GAS CO 118511 SO CALIF WATER CO SIA512 SCUTFEflh CCLATIES CIL CC i1P513 __�GUVENIR SPARKLETTS DRINKING VATER 118515 STAMEN Z SPASS6FF PE 11R516, SPECIAL FLASTIC SYSTEMS INC 11P517 ShUAPE E 1,ESTEP14 CEPCT 110518 STAR TCCL 8 SLFPLY CC 118519 STATE -E61LEGE-Mf81£AE---CTR--------- r---}-}8526--- "--`STEVENS METAL FINISHING 116521 STRAUB GIST CC LTD 118522 SUMMIT STEEL ` lIP523 11P524 SUASET FERO SUNSET fIFELINE a TERMINALLING 118525 --- -- --SUPEL-E0 IN6-- - -- - - 18526- -- SUPER CHEM CORP 11852 "� T TAUBER ELECTRONICS ti 118y2 TAYLCP-CUFN MFG CCMPANY 118529 TEKFCRM PPCDUCTS CO 11P530 IIS53 THERMCO SYSTEMS INC TMA/NORCAL - 8532--:- -"' TCVEP CCNFEPENCE RGMT. CC, 118533 TCLCFSTCAE SCFT6ARE CORP. 118534 TRAVEL TFAVEL 118535 TRI-STAR 118536 TRUCK a AUTC SUPPLY INC. 11P537 UG_-..TUCKEP .b SGN -INC '1 _418538 -- - US POSTAL SERVICE IIS5!9 UNOCAL 118540 UNITED CIRCUIT TF-CNNOLOGY 1IF541 UNITEC FAPCEL SERVICE 11P542 UNITEC S1AT£S ELEVAICR CCFF -`V6/F-ISICh. IRSTRUbENTS f19544--- - - V P LAUNCPY 118545 VOC TESTING 118546 , JI SA29019.00 - --$232s05 $35.00 $176.09 S9.1536PP 5284.40 5450.60 5150.OR 53169528.38 569735.57 s96.6Q S5.933.04 5194•?b S29735.58 S1.560.O0 5591.06 - $367.73 $2v549.62 S213614 $391.^4 5232.59 $19992.25 $118.91 $100*00 - 572.49 5670.84 $19758.81 $269.16 $2.135.16 5562.89 $150.01) 5760.On 597.76 $19895. n(I $515.04 $252.22 5133.34 $1.330.P4 $170.35 S4Q3.F2 4110.q` $327.i)r S1494110.111, 5148.62 $770.00 CONSTRUCTION 5-34-3 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT. PRE -EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS PRESENTATION AIDS SOIL TESTING M.O.7-17-91 PLUMBING SUPPLIES TOOLS COMPUTER SOFTWARE PERMIT FEES POWER NATURAL GAS WATER USE DIESEL/UNLEADED FUEL PHOTO SERVICES DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS ENGINEERING SERVICES M.O.2-14-90 PIPING HARDWARE TOOLS REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT METAL TRUCK PARTS REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT LAB SUPPLIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES BATTERIES TRUCK PARTS REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT ANALYSIS TRAINING REGISTRATION COMPUTER SOFTWARE TRAVEL SERVICES M.O.6-12-91 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT TRUCK SUPPLIES INSTRUMENT PARTS REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT UNLEADED GASOLINE REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT PARCEL SERVICES ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE LAB EQUIPMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT EMISSIONS TESTING m x C� C7d 1 00 UND hC 9199 JT DIST kCPKING CAPITAL PROCESSING, DATE 1I/13/91 FAGF'�, REPORT NUMBER AP43 HN+Y--6 filTATI-ON 01STRiCTS--OF- ORANFFCOUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11/20/91. POSTING DATE 11/2n/91 WARRANT NC. VENDOR AMOUNT 118547 VWR SCIENTIFIC S2,o672.74 —}>8rs41} VA66EY CITIES-6dPPEY--FB---- ------ 512v857.99--- 118549 VAN COREN RUBBER CO $845.03 11A550 RCSEMCUNT INC $45.89 118551 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $495.30 118552 VERTEX SYSTEMS S19072.5f1 118553 VILLAGF KbRSERIES $131.112 --118554--- VGtT-EM—1NGUSTR1E5 - ----52V15069? 118555 WE KRISPAN/KLAUS BERGER $568.70 118556 WEBER AIRCRAFT INC $5v083.58 118557 WEBER NAME PLATE S205.31 118558 WEST •COAST ANALYTICAL SPV $1v720.011 lIP559 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY S47.913.OU —118568----- XER-01f—ECRP -- --- --- $1v881.52 118561 DON YODER DEVELOPMENT 92 S4.619.5n 118562 YORRA ORANGE GROWERS $386.59 TOTAL CLAIMS FAIR 11/20/91 S295AU017.46 51ii'll T:V4 #1 OPER FUND $1,503.60 #2 OPER FUND $7,212.58 -#2-GAP--FAC-FUND -- ---- -- - -- - _$309,900.66._ .. #3 OPER FUND $17,975.74 #5 OPER FUND $9,778.59 #5 CAP PAC FUND $62,019.00 #6 OPER FUND - $687.50 #7 OPER FUND $11,135.47 —#7--CAP- PAC .-FUND $484, 026. 70 #11 OPER FUND $8,436.47 #14 OPER FUND $68.11 #14 CAP FAC FUND $6,648.37 #5&6 OPER FUND $2,834.64 #7&14 OPER FUND $88.83 --- -JT- OPER .FUND _—._........ $934 , 877 .25 CORP $392,782.04 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $5,794.93 JT WORKING CAPITAL $325,046.98 $2,580,817.46 DESCRIPTION LAB SUPPLIES PLUMBING SUPPLIES REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT FREIGHT LAB SUPPLIES COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES BUILDING REPAIRS REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT LAB SERVICES CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-8-90 COPIER LEASES REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT EXCERPT FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULP JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11,E OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA=r" C1 k A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of Coun Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m., December 11, 1991 at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing staff to conduct research project re Development and Application of Molecular _ Techniques to Detect Indicator and Pathogenic Microorganisms in Treated Wastewater _ and, Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to conduct a research project re Development and Application of Molecular Techniques to Detect Indicator and Pathogenic Microorganisms in Treated Wastewater; FURTHER MOVED: That application to the National Water Research Institute for co -funding of said research project be, and is hereby, authorized; and, FURTHER MOVED: That an expenditure of up to $453,918.00 for the two-year project, with $226,959.00 to be reimbursed by the Institute, be, and is hereby, authorized. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, RITA J. BROWN, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be a full, true and correct copy of minute entries of the meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 11th day of December, 1991. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 9th day of December, 1991. Secretary of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) S S . COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting on 0 , 196H was duly posted for public inspection at the main lobby of the Districts' offices on 4 , 19 CO . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have 4ereunto set my hand this 74-1A day of 191k I . Rita J. Brown, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 of Orange County, California ITEM NOS IS, WASTEWATER DISCHARGE REGULATIONS & FEES ORDINANCES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA November 19, 1991 10844 ELLIS AVENUE P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 (714)962-2411 STAFF REPORT ON SOURCE CONTROL WASTEWATER DISCHARGE REGULATIONS ORDINANCE REVISIONS AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING SOURCE CONTROL FEES AND CHARGES INTRODUCTION The Districts' staff is proposing revisions to the uniform Wastewater Discharge Regulations (WDR) Ordinance for each District to: incorporate recent requirements of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); incorporate changes to state law pertaining to administrative fines and civil penalties; to incorporate changes and additions to the WDR recommended by the EPA, the State Water Resources Control Board, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board; provide additional clarification for defined terms and enforcement procedures; and to replace "non-compliance fees" with "non-compliance sampling fees". The WDR regulates all discharges to the Districts' sewerage system through its permitting and enforcement provisions. Districts' staff is also proposing that a companion Ordinance be adopted that establishes fees and charges related to the administration of the source control program and WDR (these fees are presently established by Resolution of the Boards and the General Counsel has recommended that they now be adopted by ordinance). This report provides background information on the Districts' source control program, summarizes the proposed changes to the WDR, the public comments received to date, and presents a schedule for the review and adoption of the proposed WDR revisions. It also provides information on. the proposed Ordinance Establishing Source Control Fees and Charges. HISTORY OF SOURCE CONTROL REGULATIONS Recognizing the need to control the quantity and quality of wastewater discharged to the Districts' sewerage system, the Boards of Directors adopted the first WDR regulating the use of the system in February, 1954. This WDR was amended in February 1958, and again in April, 1970. The 1970 amendments formally established the Districts' Source Control Division for the purpose of issuing permits, setting flow and quality limits, and monitoring industrial discharges to the sewerage system. Effective July 1, 1976, the WDR was expanded to include metal discharge limits. On July 1, 1983, the WDR was again amended to include enforcement of the EPA's newly promulgated categorical pretreatment regulations and to modify the Districts' discharge limits for cadmium, copper, polychlorinated biphenyls, pesticides, and total toxic organics. On September 8, 1989, the WDR was further amended to include revisions to the federal pretreatment standards, other EPA -recommended language and provisions, a waste minimization program, provisions establishing procedures for the issuance of Probation Orders, Regulatory Compliance Schedule Agreements and Permit Suspensions, and modifications to the appeal procedures. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED 1992 REVISIONS TO THE WDR Staff is proposing further revisions to the 1989 WDR to: incorporate recent requirements of the EPA; incorporate changes and additions to the WDR recommended in an audit by the EPA, the State Water Resources Control Board, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board; provide additional clarification for defined terms and enforcement procedures; replace non-compliance fees with "non- compliance sampling fees"; and to incorporate recent changes to state law pertaining to administrative fines and civil penalties. A copy of the revised WDR is enclosed with this report. The proposed revisions to the 1989 Wastewater Discharge Regulations are summarized as follows: In order to comply with EPA regulations, the Districts revised the definitions of Class I User (see Section 102.A.10) which is used to determine who will be issued a Class I Permit, and Signficant Non - Compliance (see Section 102.A.77) which decides who must be published in the newspaper as not meeting permitted discharge limits. 2 Also revised were the definitions for major (see Section 102.A.42) and minor (see Section 102.A.47) violations in response to EPA recommendations. The definition of major and minor violations is the cornerstone of the Districts' pretreatment program and determines what type of enforcement action is initiated by the Districts on industrial dischargers as specified in Article 6 of the WDR. Deletes the definitions of batch dump and batch dump non-compliance fees. Controls on excessive discharges will be implemented through the issuance and enforcement of Class I permits, and through enforcement of Section 201 (Prohibited Discharges), Section 209 (Omits on Wastewater Strength and Characteristics), and Section 212 (Prohibitions on Disposal of Spent Solutions and Sludges) of the WDR. Batch dump non-compliance fees will be replaced by non-compliance sampling fees as shown in Section 602 (Enforcement Procedures and Applicable Fees). Provides for non-compliance sampling fees (see Section 602) for the administrative, field, and analytical costs of resampling an industry found to be in violation of its discharge requirements based on sampling conducted by the Districts or by the industry. This type of fee, which recaptures costs incurred by the Districts in pursuing non -compliant industries, is in accordance with EPA regulations because it is directly tied to the Districts' costs. The "non-compliance sampling fees" will replace the existing "non-compliance fees", as shown in the current WDR, which are assessed after a violation has occurred, and are based on each pound per day of pollutant in excess of a permitted limit. (Heretofore these fees were fixed in the WDR. Hereafter they will be fixed in the new ordinance establishing source control fees and charges.) The new non-compliance sampling fees are intended to simplify the fee assessment charge for costs incurred by the Districts for resampling while still providing an effective enforcement mechanism to bring companies back into compliance. Includes language which reflects recent changes to state law via enactment of Senate Bill 1024 authored by Senator David Roberti and sponsored by the California Association of Sanitation Agencies. This bill gives sanitation districts the authority to levy administrative fines and collect increased civil penalties for violations of discharge requirements or enforcement orders. Section 615 of the Waste Discharge Regulations has been revised to increase allowable civil penalties from $6,000.00 per day of violation to $25,000.00 per violation per day in accordance with the penalties authorized in Senate Bill 1024. In addition, Section 615.13 has been added to the Waste Discharge Regulations to include the administrative penalty provisions of the new law which give the Districts 3 the authority to assess companies up to $2,000.00 per day for failing to furnish technical reports or other information, up to $3,000.00 per day for failing to comply with any compliance schedule, up to $5,000.00 per violation per day for discharges in violation of any discharge limit, permit condition, or requirement, and up to $10 per gallon for discharges in violation of any prohibition, suspension, revocation or cease or desist order. PROCEDURES FOR WDR REVISIONS The procedures followed to amend the Wastewater Discharge Regulations begin with staff and General Counsel reviewing the existing Ordinance and drafting proposed revisions to include recommendations from regulatory authorities, staff, and General Counsel. The proposed changes are then mailed to all permittees and reviewed with representatives of the industrial community and regulatory agencies for their input. After comments have been received, the proposed amended Ordinance is presented to the Joint Boards of Directors for consideration. On July 15, 1991 a notice explaining the proposed revisions was mailed to the Industrial Ad Hoc Committee requesting written and oral comments. This Committee is made up of representatives from the industrial community who are permitted dischargers, and who provide a forum for reviewing Districts' source control policies and procedures. A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee was held on July 25, 1991 and was very lightly attended. A notice of the proposed revisions was sent to all Class I, II, and III permittees on July 30, 1991 requesting written comments, and to announce that a public meeting would be held on August 8, 1991 to receive written and verbal comments on the proposed revisions. This meeting was also very lightly attended. The public review period ended September 15, 1991. (It should be noted that the revision pertaining to administrative fees and civil penalties were not included in the draft mailed to permittees since the bill was just signed by the Governor in October 1991. However, since these provisions are now state law, the General Counsel has recommended that they be incorporated into the WDR.) STAFF RESPONSE TO COMMENTS RECEIVED The Districts only received written comments from three companies. No written comments were provided by state or federal regulatory authorities. Comments and questions received by Districts' staff from the industrial community were reviewed and responses were provided in writing to all interested parties that submitted comments (see Attachment 1). 4 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING SOURCE CONTROL FEES. ADMINISTRATIVE FEES, NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES, AND MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES At this time, staff is also proposing that an Ordinance be adopted that establishes the source control permit fees, administrative charges, non-compliance sampling fees and analytical costs, and miscellaneous charges. A copy of the proposed ordinance is enclosed with this report. With the exception of the non-compliance sampling fees (which replace fees presently called non-compliance fees and fixed in the current WDR) and administrative charges (proposed new charges), the fees included in the proposed Ordinance have been previously adopted by the Boards of Directors by resolution. Upon advice of Districts' General Counsel, staff is proposing that these fees now be combined into one Ordinance for adoption. The proposed Fee Ordinance contains the following provisions: • Permit fees that reflect the costs associated with the issuance of permits by the Source Control Division. • Wastehauler fees and charges which provide* for the costs of treating chemical toilet wastes and septage brought to the Districts' liquid disposal facility at Plant 1. Administrative fees to recover the costs associated with obtaining tax data or water consumption data when not submitted by permittees as required in their discharge permits. • Appeal hearing filing fees that accompany a written request for a hearing before the Executive Committee. Non-compliance sampling fees and additional analytical costs that recover the administrative and laboratory costs of resampling an industry in non-compliance. The proposed fees are $200.00 for a minor violation and $455.00 for a major violation plus associated laboratory costs. Information on how the fees and laboratory costs were determined is presented in Attachment 2. The proposed fees and charges are detailed in attached Tables A and B. »� SCHEDULE FOR ADOPTING WASTEWATER DISCHARGE REGULATIONS AND FEE ORDINANCE The proposed schedule for considering and adopting the Wastewater Discharge Regulations and Fee ordinances is shown below: Receive Staff Report and introduce the revised WDR and Fee ordinances. 2. Public Hearing for the WDR and adoption of the revised WDR and Fee ordinances. 3. -Effective dates of the WDR and Fee ordinances. FURTHER INFORMATION December 11, 1991 January 8, 1992 February 7, 1992 If any director has a question regarding the regulations, please call the Districts' Source Control Manager, Margie Nellor, at (714) 962-2411, extension 3800. N. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ATTACHMENT 1 Written Summary of Comments Received and Responses Regarding the Proposed Wastewater Discharge Regulations 1. Article 1, Page 8, Item 39, Definition of "Interference" Comment submitted by Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson. Comment - The present definition of interference is ambiguous. The Districts' definition should be changed to be identical to that of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency at 40 CFR Part 403.3. Specifically, the phrase "... disposal; or is a cause of violation of the District's NPDES permit..." should be "... disposal, and is a cause of violation of the District's NPDES permits..." The U.S. EPA definition is specific. The Districts' definition, due to the choice of phrasing, is ambiguous. The Districts have intentionally used a different definition of interference than is set forth by the U.S. EPA at 40 CFR Part 403.3. By using the phrase "disposal; Qr is a cause of violation of the Districts' NPDES permit or prevents lawful sludge use or disposal", the Districts intend to prevent discharges which adversely affect the Districts' treatment processes or operations, whether or not such discharges actually cause a violation of the Districts' NPDES permit. There is a significant possibility that certain discharges may occur which will adversely affect the Districts' treatment facilities, and yet, because of the efficiency of the Districts' treatment facilities, these discharges may not actually cause a violation of the Districts' NPDES permit. It is the Districts' position that such discharges are properly characterized as "Interference". Based upon this analysis, the Districts do not believe that the definition of Interference is ambiguous. R is merely more restrictive than the U.S. EPA definition. The Federal Regulations (40 CFR Part 403.4) specifically provide that a local agency's pretreatment program may be more stringent than EPA regulations. This is one instance in which the Districts have opted to Implement more stringent regulations. 2. Article 1, Page 8, Item 42, Definition of "Major Violation" Comment submitted by Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson Comment - The definition allows the use of a composite sample to determine compliance with pH limits. For wastewater that contains substantial quantities of biologically active material such as food processing wastewaters, composite samples (especially 24-hour composites) are inappropriate. The Districts agree and will write a composite sample collection and analysis protocol specifically for food processing wastewater. The Districts will seek input from industry on this issue and will take into account the degradation of the sample. 3. Article 1, Page 11, Item 77, Definition of "Significant Non -Compliance" (SNC) Comment submitted by Becwar Engineering. Comment - Item "C" seems very ambiguous with the words "any other violation..... that the District determines.... either alone or in combination with other discharges..." can be interpreted however the District finds fit in assigning "SNC" status. Suggest rewording to clarify or adding that "SNC" status will be applied at the second violation for the same offense. "Significant non-compliance" should not be determined by such vague parameters". item "H" very similar in context. The Districts' definition for items "C" and "H" are taken directly from the EPA definition. The Districts do not have the option of deviating from the EPA definition to Indicate that the "SNC" status will be applied at the 2nd violation. According to the federal definition, one non-compliance may determine SNC If that was the only sample taken. 4. Article 3, Section 302.2.A.4 Comment submitted by Becwar Engineering. Comment - Questioning the use of the words "production data". We have enough problems training personnel to make and understand circuit boards, without training new people. The question is: what is this information used for? For certain categories of dischargers, the EPA has based the discharge standards on how many pounds of product per square feet of product are produced. This information Is needed to set correct permit limits in accordance with federal categorical pretreatment standards. 2 5. Article 3, Page 27, Section 302.6.G.1 Comment submitted by Becwar Engineering. Comment - It is proposed by the Districts to change the allowance for sanitary wastewater from 10,000 gallons per employee per year (approximately 40 gallons per employee per working day) to "15 gallons per employee per eight -hour working day". This lower allowance may be sufficient for employees engaged in sedentary activities in air-conditions work areas. However, employees at many companies are working in areas that are not so comfortable. Employees in our food processing facility are quite active and do not enjoy and air conditioned work place. In addition, many take showers at the end of their shift and all employees must be constantly conscious of proper sanitation practices (e.g. washing hands). There are numerous published references as to what a suitable allowance for each employee should be. Many are higher than 15 gallons per day. In fact, 15 gallons per day is on the low end of most values. Most people would agree that an allowance of 40 gallons per day is too high. However, I believe that 15 gallons per day is too low. A more equitable allowance would be 25 gallons per employee per eight -hour working day. The Districts have found that the current allowance of approximately 40 gallons per employee per day is too high. The Districts initially proposed an allowance of 15 gallons per day, per eight -hour work day based on Information obtained from a standard engineering textbook. In response to public comments, additional research was initiated which has shown that the water usage documented In other engineering manuals ranges from 15-35 gallons per day. The Districts have therefore revised the proposed ordinance language giving an allowance of 25 gallons per employee per eight -hour work day. An industrial discharger has the option to petition for a higher allowance provided that sufficient documentation can be provided. 6. Article 6, Page 50, Section 600.0 Comment submitted by Becwar Engineering. Comment - This gives the Districts apparently unlimited enforcement measures: "..in its discretion, may utilize any one, combination or all enforcement remedies ... in response to any permit or ordinance violation." Present wording sounds both arbitrary and threatening. Penalties should logically coincide with severity of non-compliance. This paragraph gives the District an undue amount of penalizing authority to use how it 3 wants, when it wants, and against whom, regardless of violation status. What happened to "fair and just punishment". The Districts should n_gt be limited In their enforcement options as the circumstances of a particular situation may require that significant enforcement action be taken for a first time violation (i.e. intentional dumping). The Districts need the authority to enforce any provisions of the Ordinance. Item "C' was inserted to clarify the Districts' enforcement options. Even though a company has been charged a non-compliance sampling fee for a specific discharge violation, the Districts may further utilize that violation in combination with other data as part of an industry's non-compliance history for purposes such as issuing Probation Orders or ECSAs, and initiating permit revocation proceedings or civil actions. 7. Article 6, Page 51, Section 601.A.3 Comment submitted by Becwar Engineering. Comment - This tends to change the locations from which you sample. This would open all kinds of doors. Any sample taken from a sample box or other representative sampling location is considered to be representative of the discharge to the public sewer. This would give the right to any of your agents, to take a sample at the plating tanks, i.e. tin -lead dragouts, copper dragouts, etc. The term "sample point" is defined in Section 102.A.70 to mean a location approved by the Districts and representative of the user's wastewater flow. Therefore, the commentator's fears concerning arbitrary enforcement on non-specific sampling locations are unfounded. The Districts may not sample for purposes of establishing a discharge violation at process tanks except as expressly directed by the EPA or if such sample point is representative of the user's discharge to the sewer. 8. Article 6, Page 51, Section 601.A.2 Comment submitted by Northrop Corporation. Comment - Although the intention of the Districts may be otherwise, one could interpret this section to mean that non-compliance with all mass or concentration limitations can be determined on any one grab sample. The author would like it noted that EPA established testing methods require a 24-hour composite sample for many constituents and for these constituents the discharge prohibitions in section 201 of the same Ordinance (State and Federal regulated wastes) would be the compliance - determining parameters. 4 The Districts agree with this comment, and therefore have revised Section 601.A.2 in response to this comment to more clearly define the circumstances in which a grab sample may be used to establish the violation of a mass emission discharge limit. The initial draft read as follows: 'Non-cornpliancae with mass emission rate limits, concentration limits, permit discharge conditions, or any discharge provision of this Ordinance may be determined by an analysis of a grab or composite sample of the effluent of a user.' The revised Ordinance now reads as follows: Non-compliance with mass emission rate limits, concentr on limits, permit discharge conditions, or any discharge provision of this Ordinance may be determined by an analysis of a grab or composite sample of the effluent of a user. Non-compliance with mass emission rate limits shall be determined by an anaWs of a composite sample of the user's effluent; except that a grab sample may be used to determine compliance with mass emission rate limits when the discharge is from a closed (batch) treatment system in which there is no wastewater flow into the system when the discharge is occurring, the volume of wastewater contained In the batch system is known, the time interval of discharge is known, and the grab sample is homogeneous and representative of the discharge.' 5 ATTACHMENT 2 SAMPLING AND ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS . FOR DETERMINATION OF NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES ASSOCIATED WITH THE DISTRICTS SAMPLING AFTER A MAJOR OR MINOR VIOLATION 6/28191 DIVISION EMPLOYEE HOURS TASKS NEEDED TO ACCOMPLISH RESAMPLING AVERAGE DISTRICTS DISTRICT COST TITLE HOURLY COST COSTS + 71 % ACTUALLY USED RATE OVERHEAD IN DETERMINATION SOURCE ASSISTANT 0.50 CLEAN AND PREPARE SAMPLERS 11.45 5.73 9.80 10.00 CONTROL SOURCE INSPECTOR 4.50 SET SAMPLER AND RETURN TO OFFICE, PREPARE PAPER WORK 15.13 68.09 116.43 11.5.00 CONTROL SOURCE LEAD INSPECTOR 0.50 REVIEW WAR AND DETERMINE RESAMPLING SCHEDULE 17.88 8.94 15.29 15.00 CONTROL SOURCE CLERICAL 0.25 ENTER LAB DATA. FIELD DATA AND PRINT REPORT, FILING 11.69 2.92 4.99 5.00 CONTROL SOURCE SUPERVISORS 0.75 WRITE REPORTS, REVIEW FILES. DISCUSSION ON VIOLATION 22.17 16.63 28.44 30.00 CONTROL ACCOUNTING CLERICAL 1.00 LEDGERS. POSTING, TRACKING OF PAYMENTS, COLLECTIONS 15.00 15.00 25.65 25.00 TOTAL COST OF PROCESSING AND SAMPLING A 200.00 MINOR VIOLATION SOURCE ENGINEERS 6.75 ADDITIONAL STAFF REPORTS, INSPECTIONS, REPORT WRITING, 22.17 149.65 255.90 255.00 CONTROL MAJOR LETTER, TRAVEL TIME. VIOLATION TOTAL COST OF PROCESSING AND SAMPLING A 0.00 0.00 455.00 MAJOR VIOLATION LABORATORY LABORATORY 0.50 HEAVY METALS ANALYSIS (7 METALS): CLEAN GLASSWARE, 15.36 7.68 13.13 ANALYST SAMPLE PREPARATION SAMPLE ANALYSISQUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY PRINCIPAL LAB 0.10 HEAVY METALS ANALYSIS (7 METALS): REVIEW DATA, 20.91 2.09 3.57 16.00 AND RESEARCH EVALUATE QUALITY ASSURANCE, REPORT RESULTS ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 0.50 ARSENIC ANALYSIS: CLEAN GLASSWARE, SAMPLE PREPARATION. 15.36 7.68 13.13 ANALYST SAMPLE ANALYSIS. QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY PRINCIPAL LAB 0.10 ARSENIC ANALYSIS: REVIEW DATA, EVALUATE QUALITY 20.91 2.09 3.57 16_.00 AND RESEARCH ASSURANCE, REPORT RESULTS ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 4.8 MERCURY ANALYSIS: CLEAN GLASSWARE, SAMPLE PREPARATION, 15.36 73.73 126.08 ANALYST I SAMPLE ANALYSIS, QUALITY ASSURANCE DIVISION EMPLOYEE HOURS TASKS NEEDED TO ACCOMPLISH RESAMPLING AVERAGE DISTRICTS DISTRICT COST TITLE HOURLY COST COSTS + 71 % ACTUALLY USED RATE OVERHEAD IN DETERMINATION LABORATORY PRINCIPAL LAB 0.10 MERCURY ANALYSIS: REVIEW DATA, EVALUATE QUALITY 20.91 2.09 3.57 130.00 AND RESEARCH ASSURANCE, REPORT RESULTS ' ANALYST I LABORATORY LABORATORY 2.50 601/602 ANALYSIS: CLEAN GLASSWARE, MAKE DILUTIONS, 15.36 38.40 65.66 ANALYST/SR. ANALYZE SAMPLE, QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY ANALYST LABORATORY PRINCIPAL LAB 0.50 601/602 ANALYSIS: REVIEW DATA, EVALUATE QUALITY 20.91 10.46 17.89 84.00 AND RESEARCH ASSURANCE, REPORT RESULTS ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 5.50 604 ANALYSIS: CLEAN GLASSWARE, PREPARE EXTRACTIONS, 15.36 84.48 144.46 ANALYST/SR. CONCENTRATE. MAKE DILUTIONS, ANALYZE SAMPLE, QUALITY LABORATORY ASSURANCE ANALYST LABORATORY PRINCIPAL LAB 0.25 604 ANALYSIS: REVIEW DATA, EVALUATE QUALITY ASSURANCE, 20.91 5.23 8.94 153.00 AND RESEARCH REPORT RESULTS ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 6.50 606 ANALYSIS: CLEAN GLASSWARE, PREPARE EXTRACTIONS, 15.36 99.84 170.73 ANALYST/SR. CONCENTRATE, MAKE DILUTIONS, ANALYZE SAMPLE, QUALITY LABORATORY ASSURANCE ANALYST LABORATORY PRINCIPAL LAB 0.25 606 ANALYSIS: REVIEW DATA, EVALUATE QUALITY ASSURANCE, 20.91 5.23 8.94 180.00 AND RESEARCH REPORT RESULTS ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 7.00 608 ANALYSIS: CLEAN GLASSWARE, PREPARE EXTRACTIONS, 15.36 107.52 183.86 ANALYST/SR. CONCENTRATE. MAKE DILUTIONS, ANALYZE SAMPLE, QUALITY LABORATORY ASSURANCE ANALYST LABORATORY PRINCIPAL LAB 0.25 608 ANALYSIS: REVIEW DATA, EVALUATE QUALITY ASSURANCE, 20.91 5.23 8.94 193.00 AND RESEARCH REPORT RESULTS ANALYST LABORATORY OUTSIDE 624 ANALYSIS: 0.00 0.00 225.00 LABORATORY LABORATORY OUTSIDE 625 ANALYSIS: 0.00 375.00 LABORATORY 0.00 LABORATORY LABORATORY 1.00 AMMONIA ANALYSIS AS NITROGEN: 14.26 14.26 24.38 24.00 ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 1.00 BIOCHEMICAL DEMAND (BOD) DETERMINATION: 14.26 14.26 24.38 24.00 ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 1.25 800 AND SUSPENDED SOLIDS DETERMINATION: 14.26 17.83 30.49 30.00 ANALYST DIVISION EMPLOYEE HOURS TASKS NEEDED TO ACCOMPLISH RESAMPLING AVERAGE DISTRICTS DISTRICT COST TITLE HOURLY COST COSTS + 71 % ACTUALLY USED RATE OVERHEAD IN DETERMINATION LABORATORY LABORATORY 0.50 CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (COD) DETERMINATION: 14.26 7.13 12.19 12.00 ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 0.25 CONDUCTIVITY DETERMINATION: 14.26 3.57 6.10 6.00 ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 2.00 CYANIDE (AMENABLE) DETERMINATION: 14.26 28.52 48.77 48.00 ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 1.25 CYANIDE (TOTAL) DETERMINATION: 14.26 17.83 30.49 30.00 ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 0.50 DISSOLVED MINERAL SOLIDS DETERMINATION: 14.26 7.13 12.19 12.00 ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 3.00 HEXANE SOLUBLE MATTER (GREASE AND OIL) ANALYSIS: 14.26 42.78 73.15 73.00 ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 3.00 GREASE AND OIL - MINERAL PARTITION: 14.26 42.78 73.15 73.00 ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 1.00 NITROGEN WELDHAL OR TOTAL ORGANIC) ANALYSIS: 14.26 14.26 24.38 24.00 ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 0.25 pH DETERMINATION: 14.26 3.57 6.10 6.00 ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 3.00 PHENOL DETERMINATION: 14.26 42.78 73.15 73.00 ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 0.25 SUSPENDED SOLIDS (TOTAL ONLY) DETERMINATION: 14.26 3.57 6.10 6.00 ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 0.50 SUSPENDED SOLIDS (TOTAL AND VOLATILE) DETERMINATION: 14.26 7.13 12.19 12.00 ANALYST TABLE "A" SOURCE CONTROL FEES, ADMINISTRATIVE FEES, AND MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES Permit Fees: Class I Permit $250.00/Year (Ord. No. , Sec. 302.3) Class II Permit $100.00/3 Years (Ord. No. , Sec. 303.3) Class III Permit $ 75.00/3 Years (Ord. No. , Sec. 304.3) Special Purpose Discharge Permit $250.00/Year (Ord. No. , Sec. 305.3) Wastehauler Discharge Permit $ 75.00/Year (Ord. No. , Sec. 306.3) Wastehauler Discharge Permittee Decal: Initial Issue $25.00 Replacement $50.00 Wastehauler Discharge Permittee Entry Card: Initial Issue $ 50.00 Replacement $100.00 Wastehauler Discharge Permittee - Charge for Use: Waste originating within District Waste originating outside District Transportable Treatment Unit Discharge Permit Fees (Ord. No. , Sec. 307.3) $0.02/gallon of truck capacity $0.04/gallon of truck capacity $250.00/Year TABLE "A" (CONTINUED) SOURCE CONTROL FEES, ADMINISTRATIVE FEES, AND MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES Administrative/Processing Fees: District Collection of Tax Data $100.00/Permit (Ord. No. , Sec. 302.6(c), 303.6(c), 304.6(c)) District Collection of Water Consumption Data $100.00/Permit (Ord. No. , Sec. 302.6(d), 303.6(d), 304.6(d)) Appeal Hearing Filing Fee $400.00 (Ord. No. , Sec. 618) TABLE "B" NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES 1. Total Cost of Processing and Sampling a Minor Violation $200.00/per occurrence 2. Total Cost of Processing and Sampling a Major Violation $455.00/per occurrence 3. Additional Costs for Specific Analyses as Required A. Heavy Metals Analysis $ 16.00 (This price includes analysis of all the following:) Cadmium Chromium Copper Nickel Lead Silver Zinc B. Arsenic Analysis $ 16.00 C. Mercury Analysis $130.00 D. 601 /602 Analysis $ 84.00 E. 604 Analysis $153.00 �. 606 Analysis $180.00 G. 608 Analysis $193.00 H. 624 Analysis $225.00 I. 625 Analysis $375.00 J. Ammonia Analysis as Nitrogen $ 24.00 K. Biochemical Demand (BOD) Analysis $ 24.00 TABLE "B" (CONTINUED) . NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES L BOD and Suspended Solids Analysis $ 30.00 M. Chemical Oxygen Demand Analysis $ 12.00 N. Conductivity Analysis $ 6.00 0. Cyanide (Amenable) Analysis $ 48.00 P. Cyanide (Total) Analysis $ 30.00 0. Dissolved Mineral Solids Analysis $ 12.00 R. Grease and Oil (Hexane Soluble Matter) Analysis $ 73.00 S. Grease and Oil (Mineral Partition) Analysis $ 73.00 T. Total Organic Nitrogen Analysis $ 24.00 U. pH Analysis $ 73.00 V. Phenol Analysis $ 73.00 W. Suspended Solids (Total Only) Analysis $ 6.00 X. Suspended Solids (Total and Volatile) Analysis $ 12.00 FEBRUARY 7, 1992 If F :V COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 101. PURPOSE AND POLICY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 102. DEFINITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 103. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 104. TRANSFER OF PERMITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 105. EFFECT OF TRANSFER OF PERMITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 106. AUTHORITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 107. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 108. SIGNATORY REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . 15 ARTICLE 2 GENERAL PROHIBITIONS AND LIMITS ON DISCHARGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 201. PROHIBITED DISCHARGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 202. PROHIBITION ON DILUTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . 17 203. PROHIBITION ON SURFACE RUNOFF AND GROUNDWATER . . . . . . . . . . . 17 204. PROHIBITION ON UNPOLLUTED WATER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 205. PROHIBITION ON RADIOACTIVE WASTES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 206. PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF GRINDERS . . . . . . I. . . . . . . . . . 18 207. PROHIBITION ON POINT OF DISCHARGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 18 208. PROHIBITION ON WASTEHAULER DISCHARGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 209. LIMITS ON WASTEWATER STRENGTH AND CHARACTERISTICS . . . . . . . . . 18 210. MASS EMISSION RATE DETERMINATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 211. PROHIBITION ON MEDICAL WASTE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 212. PROHIBITION ON DISPOSAL OF SPENT SOLUTIONS AND SLUDGES . . . . . . 20 ARTICLE 3 DISCHARGE PERMITS, CHARGES, AND FEES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 301. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 302. CLASS I WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 302.1 Class I Wastewater Discharge Permit Application . . . . . . 23 302.2 Class I Permit Conditions, and Limits . . . . . . . . . . . 24 302.3 Class I Permit Fee . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 302.4 Class I Permit Modification of Terms and Conditions . . . . 25 302.5 Class I Permit Duration and Renewal . . . . . . . . .. . . 26 302.6 Class I Permit Charge for Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 303. CLASS II WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS . . . . . . . . . If . . . . 28 303.1 Class II Wastewater Discharge Permit Application . . . . . . 28 303.2 Class II Permit Conditions, and Limits . . . . . . . . . . . 29 303.3 Class II Permit Fee .. . . .. . . . . 30 303.4 Class II Permit Modification of Terms and Conditions . . . 30 303.5 Class II Permit Duration and Renewal . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 303.6 Class II Permit Charge for Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 304. CLASS III WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 304.1 Class III Wastewater Discharge Permit Application . . . . . 33 304.2 Class III Permit Conditions and Limits . . . . . . . . . . . 34 304.3 Class III Permit Fee . . . . 34 304.4 Class III Permit Modification of Terms and Conditions 35 304.5 Class III Permit Duration and Renewal . . . . . . . . . . . 35 304.6 Class III Permit Charge For Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 305. SPECIAL PURPOSE DISCHARGE PERMITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 305.1 Special Purpose Discharge Permit Application s . . . . . . 305.2 Special Purpose Discharge Permit Conditions and Limits .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 305.3 Special Purpose Discharge Permit Fee . . . . . . . . . . 305.4 Special Purpose Dishcarge Permit Modification of Terms and Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 305.5 Special Purpose Discharge Permit Duration and Renewal . . . 305.6 Special Purpose Discharge Permit Charge for Use . . . . . . 306. WASTEHAULER DISCHARGE PERMIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 306.1 Wastehauler Discharge Permit Application .. . . . . . 306.2 Wastehauler Discharge Permit Conditions and Limits . . . . . 306.3 Wastehauler Discharge Permit Fee . . . . . . . . . . . . 306.4 Wastehauler Identification Decal and Access Card Transfer 306.5 Wastehauler Discharge Permit Modification of Terms and Conditions . . . .. . . . . . 306.6 Wastehauler Discharge Permit Duration and Renewal . . . . . 306.7 Wastehauler Discharge Permit Charge for Use . . . . . . . . 37 37 37 37 38 38 38 39 39 39 40 40 40 40 307. TRANSPORTABLE TREATMENT UNIT (TTU) DISCHARGE PERMIT . . . . . . 40 307.1 TTU Discharge Permit Application •. . . . . . . . . . . . 40 307.2 TTU Discharge Permit Conditions and Limits . . . . . . . . . 41 307.3 TTU Discharge Permit Fee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 ii 307.4 TTU Discharge Permit Modification of Terms and Conditions . 307.5 TTU Discharge Permit Duration and Renewal . . . . . . . . 308. LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY EXEMPTION FROM CHARGES . . . . . . . 309. EXCESS CAPACITY CHARGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310. OUT OF DISTRICT PERMITS/DISCHARGERS . . . . . . . . . . . . ARTICLE 4 FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS 401. DRAWING SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 402. PRETREATMENT FACILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 403. SPILL CONTAINMENT FACILITIES/ACCIDENTAL SLUG CONTROL PLANS . . . . 404. MONITORING/METERING FACILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 405. WASTE MINIMIZATION REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ARTICLE 5 MONITORING, REPORTING, NOTIFICATION, AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 501. MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 501.1 Inspection and Sampling Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . 501.2 Right of Entry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 501.3 Notification of Spill or Slug Loading . . . . . . . . . . . 501.4 Notification of Bypass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ARTICLE 6 ENFORCEMENT 600. PURPOSE AND SCOPE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 601. DETERMINATION OF NON-COMPLIANCE WITH DISCHARGE LIMITS . . . . . . . 602. ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES AND APPLICABLE FEES . . . . . . . . . . . . 602.1 Probation Order . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 602.2 Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreement (ECSA) . . . . . 603. REGULATORY COMPLIANCE -SCHEDULE AGREEMENT (RCSA) . . . . . . . . . . 604. PERMIT SUSPENSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 605. PERMIT REVOCATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii 42 42 42 43 43 44 44 44 44 45 45 46 46 47 47 47 48 49 49 50 50 51 52 53 53 55 606. WASTEHAULER NON-COMPLIANCE WITH PERMIT CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . 56 607. DAMAGE TO FACILITIES OR INTERRUPTION OF NORMAL OPERATIONS 57 608. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PASS THROUGH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 609. PUBLICATION OF VIOLATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 610. PUBLISHED NOTICES FOR SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE . . . . . . . . . 58 611. PUBLIC NUISANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 612. TERMINATION OF SERVICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 613. EMERGENCY SUSPENSION ORDER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 614. INJUNCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 615. CIVIL PENALTIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 616. CRIMINAL PENALTIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 617. APPEALS TO GENERAL MANAGER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 618. APPEALS TO THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 618.1 Appeal of Charges and Fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 619. PAYMENT OF CHARGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 619.1 Collection of Delinquent Accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 620. RECOVERY OF COSTS INCURRED BY DISTRICT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 621. FINANCIAL SECURITY/AMENDMENTS TO PERMIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 622. JUDICIAL REVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 ARTICLE 7 CONNECTION PERMITS/CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 701. INTRODUCTION - ALL DISTRICTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 702. DISTRICT NO. 1 CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES . . . . . . . 69 702. DISTRICT NO. 2 CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES . . . . . . . 71 702. DISTRICT NO. 3 CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES . . . . . . . 73 702. DISTRICT NO. 5 CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES . . . . . . . 75 702. DISTRICT NO. 6 CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES . . . . . . . 77 702. DISTRICT NO. 7 CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES . . . . . . . 79 702. DISTRICT NO. 11 CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES . . . . . . 81 702. DISTRICT NO. 13 CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES . . . . . . . 83 iv 703. ANNUAL SUPPLEMENTAL SANITARY SEWER USE CHARGE . . . . . . . . . . . 85 704. EXCEPTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 705. EXEMPTIONS AND APPEALS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 706. CREDIT FOR INDUSTRIAL PERMITTEES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 ARTICLE 8 SEVERABILITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 801. SEVERABILITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 ARTICLE 9 (RESERVED) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 v COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY WASTEWATER DISCHARGE REGULATIONS INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts) were formed during 1946-47, but did not commence operation until 1954 with the acquisition of treatment facilities in Fountain Valley and completion of the treatment plant and ocean outfall in Huntington Beach. Recognizing the need to control the quantity and quality of wastewaters discharged to the sewerage facilities, the Districts' Boards of Directors adopted their first Ordinance regulating the use of the sewerage systems in February 1954. This Ordinance was later amended in February 1958 and again in April 1970. The 1970 revision formally established the Districts' Industrial Waste Division (since renamed the Source Control Division) for the purpose of issuing permits, setting flow and quality limits, monitoring discharges to the system, and conducting enforcement activities. The administrative procedures and use charges were modified with each revision, but the basic quality requirements remained essentially unchanged until July 1, 1976, when the Ordinance was revised to include heavy metal limits. On July 1, 1983, the Ordinance was amended to include enforcement of the Environmental Protection Agency's Federal Categorical Pretreatment Standards and to modify some of the non -compatible pollutant limits such as heavy metals. On September 8, 1989 the Ordinance was revised to clarify and streamline Districts' procedures. This Ordinance sets forth uniform requirements for users of the Districts' sewerage facilities and to enable the Districts to comply with all applicable state and Federal laws including the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251, et. seq.), and the General Pretreatment Regulations (40 CFR 403). The objectives of this Ordinance are: o To ensure the Districts' compliance with the requirements of Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies and the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). o To prevent the introduction of pollutants into the Districts' sewerage facilities which may interfere with District operations. o To prevent the introduction of pollutants into the Districts' sewerage facilities which may pass through the Districts' sewerage facilities, inadequately treated, into receiving waters or otherwise be incompatible with the sewerage facilities. o To enforce Federal Categorical Pretreatment Standards. o To ensure'that the quality of the municipal sludge is maintained at a level which allows its use and disposal in compliance with applicable statutes and regulations. o To improve the opportunity to recycle, reuse, and conserve non-renewable resources. o To require waste minimization and material substitution by industrial users. o To minimize the discharge of volatile organic compounds that separately or collectively contribute to air emissions from the Districts' sewerage facilities. 1 o To prevent exposure of the Districts' employees to chemical hazards created by industrial discharges. o To require the reduction of water discharged to the Districts' sewerage facilities. o To establish an effective permitting, monitoring, and enforcement program for the control of industrial wastewaters. o To equitably allocate treatment costs. This Ordinance shall apply to all users of the Districts' sewerage facilities. The Ordinance authorizes the issuance of Wastewater Discharge Permits; authorizes monitoring, compliance, and enforcement activities; establishes administrative review procedures; requires industrial user reporting; and provides for the setting of fees for the equitable distribution of costs resulting from the program established herein. 2 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ESTABLISHING WASTEWATER DISCHARGE REGULATIONS The Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California do hereby ORDAIN: Section I: wastewater Discharge Regulations governing the use of District sewerage facilities are hereby enacted to provide: ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS 101. PURPOSE AND POLICY A. The purpose of this Ordinance is to provide for the maximum public benefit from the use of District's facilities. This shall be accomplished by regulating sewer use and wastewater discharges, by providing equitable distribution of costs in compliance with applicable Federal, State and local Regulations, and by providing procedures that will allow the District to comply with requirements placed upon the District by other regulatory agencies. The revenues to be derived from the application of this Ordinance shall be used to defray all costs of providing sewerage service by the District, including, but not limited to, administration, operation, monitoring, maintenance, financing, capital construction, replacement and recovery, and provisions for necessary reserves. B. This Ordinance shall be interpreted in accordance with the definitions set forth in Section 102. The provisions of the Ordinance shall apply to the direct or indirect discharge of all liquid wastes carried to facilities of the District. C. To comply with Federal, State, and local policies and to allow the District to meet applicable standards of treatment plant effluent quality, sludge quality, and air quality, provisions are made in this Ordinance for the regulation of wastewater discharges to the public sewer. This Ordinance establishes quantity and quality limits on all wastewater discharges which may adversely affect.the District's sewerage systems, processes, effluent quality, sludge quality, air emission characteristics, or inhibit the District's ability to beneficially reuse or dispose of its sludge or meet sludge discharge criteria. It is the intent of these limits to improve the quality of wastewater being received for treatment and to encourage water conservation and waste minimization by all users connected to a public sewer. It is the District's intent to limit future increases in the quantity (mass emission) of waste constituents being discharged. This Ordinance also provides for regulation of the degree of waste pretreatment required, the issuance of permits for wastewater discharge and connections and other miscellaneous permits, and establishes penalties for violation of the Ordinance. D. Since the District is committed to a policy of wastewater reclamation and reuse in order to provide an alternate source of 3 water supply,' the implementation of programs for reclamation through secondary and tertiary wastewater treatment processes may necessitate more stringent quality requirements on wastewater discharges. In the event that more stringent quality requirements are necessary, the Ordinance will be amended to reflect those changes. E. Since the District is committed to a policy for the beneficial use of sludge, the implementation of programs to land -apply or provide for the marketing and distribution of sludge may necessitate more stringent quality requirements on wastewater discharges. F. Since the District is also committed to meet applicable air quality goals established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District, more stringent quality requirements on wastewater discharges may be required to meet such goals. 102. DEFINITIONS A. Unless otherwise defined herein, terms related to water quality shall be as adopted in the latest edition of standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, published by the American Public Health Association, the American Water Works Association and the Water Pollution Control Federation. The testing procedures for waste constituents and characteristics shall be as provided in 40 CFR 136 (Code of Federal Regulations; Title 40; Protection of Environment; Chapter I, Environmental Protection Agency; Part 136, Test Procedures for the Analyses of Pollutants), or as specified. Other terms not herein defined are defined as being the same as set forth in the International Conference of B_u_ildinQ Officials Uniform Building Code, Current Edition. 1. Ad Valorem Tax shall mean that portion of the basic tax allocated for the benefit of an individual District on the assessed value of land and improvements within its boundaries, exclusive of bonded indebtedness. 2. Assessed Value shall mean that portion of the total assessed value of the land and improvements upon which taxes are collected and allocated. 3. Biochemical Oxygen Demand (B9D1 shall mean the measure of biodegradable organic material in domestic or other wastewaters as represented by the quantity of oxygen utilized over a period of five days at 20 degrees centigrade and as determined by the appropriate testing procedures, and expressed in terms of mass and/or concentration [pounds per day or milligrams per liter (mg/L)]. 4. Board shall mean the Board of Directors of the County Sanitation District No. of Orange County, California. References to the "Joint Boards of Directors" shall mean the combined governing Boards of all Districts that are signatory to the -Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement of July 1, 1985. S. Bypass shall mean the intentional diversion of wastestreams from any portion of an industrial user's treatment facility. 6. Capital Facilities Connection Charge shall mean the one-time payment of a fee, imposed by the governing Board of the 4 District, to pay for the future costs of constructing new sewerage collection, treatment, and disposal facilities; the replacement, rehabilitation, or reconstruction of existing facilities; and as a contributive share of the cost of the existing facilities. Said charge shall be paid by all property owners at the time they develop the property and connect directly or indirectly to the District sewerage facilities as a new system user. This charge, as set forth in Article 7 of this Ordinance, is expressly authorized by the provisions of California Health & Safety Code Sections 5471 and 5474. 7. Capital Facilities Replacement Service Charge shall mean a charge imposed on a user of the treatment works, pursuant'to Sections 302.6(F)2, 303.6(F)2 or 304.6(B)2 of this Ordinance, which may be used to recover the costs of operation and maintenance, which charges shall be allocated to the Distbict's Operating Fund. 8. Charge For Use shall mean a charge established and levied by the District upon residential, commercial and industrial users in proportion to the use of the treatment works by their respective class, that provides for the operation and maintenance expenses, capital facilities rehabilitation or replacement, and adequate reserves for the sewage treatment works. 9. Chemical Oxvaen Demand (COD) shall mean the measure of chemically oxidizable material in domestic or other wastewaters as determined by appropriate testing procedures and expressed in terms of milligrams per liter. 10. Class I User shall mean any user who discharges wastewater that: a) Is subject to Federal Categorical Pretreatment Standards; or b) averages 25,000 gallons per day or more of regulated process wastewater; or c) is determined by the General Manager to have a reasonable potential for adversely affecting the Districts' operation or for violating any pretreatment standard, local limit, or discharge requirement; or d) may cause, as determined by the General Manager, pass through or interference with the District sewerage facilities. 11. Class II User shall mean any industrial user whose charge for use is greater than the ad valorem tax basic levy allocated to the District, exclusive of debt service, that discharges wastes other than sanitary, and that is not otherwise required to obtain a Class I permit. 12. Class III User shall mean any user that discharges only sanitary waste and whose charge for use is greater than the ad valorem tax basic levy allocated to the District, exclusive of debt service, and is not otherwise required to obtain a Class I or Class II permit. Unless otherwise stipulated in the permit, Class III users shall be considered discharging a domestic waste equivalent for BOD and suspended solids. 13. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) shall mean the codification of the general and permanent regulations published in the Federal Register by the executive departments and agencies of the Federal Government. 14. Compatible Pollutant shall mean a combination of biochemical oxygen demand, suspended solids, pH, fecal coliform bacteria, plus other pollutants that the District's treatment facilities are designed to accept and/or remove. Compatible pollutants are non -compatible when discharged in quantities that have an adverse effect on the District's system or NPDES permit, or when discharged in qualities or quantities violating any Federal Categorical Pretreatment Standard, local limit, or other discharge requirement. 15. Composite Sample shall mean a collection of individual samples obtained at selected intervals based on an increment of either flow or time. The resulting mixture (composite sample), forms a representative sample of the wastestream discharged during the sample period. Samples will be collected when manufacturing, processing, or other industrial wastewater discharge occurs. 16. Connection Permit shall mean a permit issued by the governing District, upon payment of a capital facilities connection charge, authorizing the permittee to connect directly to a District sewerage facility or to a sewer which ultimately discharges into a District sewerage facility. 17. CSDOC shall mean County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. 18. Cyanide, (Amenable) shall mean those cyanides amenable to chlorination as described in 40 CFR 136.3. 19. Department Head shall mean that person duly designated by the. General Manager to direct the Source Control Division and perform those delegated duties as specified in this Ordinance. 20. Development shall mean parcel of land on which -dwelling units, commercial or industrial buildings or other improvements are built. 21. Discharger shall mean any person who discharges or causes a discharge of wastewater directly or indirectly to a public sewer. Discharger shall mean the same as User. 22. District shall mean any individual or combination of individual County Sanitation Districts No. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, or 14 of Orange County and shall include any Districts that are formed after the effective date of this Ordinance that are included in the Joint Administrative Organization. The term includes the plural and/or the possessive where appropriate. 23. District Sewerage Facility or System shall mean any property belonging to the District used in the treatment, reclamation, reuse, transportation, or disposal of wastewater, or sludge. 24. Division Head shall mean that person duly designated by the General Manager to implement the District's Source Control Program and perform the duties as specified in this Ordinance. 25. Domestic Wastewater shall mean the liquid and solid waterborne wastes derived from the ordinary living processes of humans of such character as to permit satisfactory disposal, without special treatment, into the public sewer or by means of a private disposal system. 6 26— Dwelling Unit shall mean a single unit providing complete, independent living facilities for one or more persons, which may include permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking and sanitation. For the purpose of this Ordinance, a mobile home shall be considered as a Dwelling Unit. More than one Dwelling Unit per structure and/or lot shall be deemed multiple Dwelling Units. 27. Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreement (ECSAI shall mean a mutual agreement between the District and permittee amending the permit to require implementation of necessary pretreatment practices and/or installation of equipment to ensure permit compliance. 28. Executive Committee shall mean the Executive Committee of the combined governing Boards (Joint Boards of Directors) of all Districts that are signatory to the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement of July 1, 1985. 29. Federal Categorical Pretreatment Standards shall mean any regulation containing pollutant discharge limits promulgated by the U.S. EPA in accordance with Sections 307(b) and (c) of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1317) which apply to a specific category of industrial users and which appear in 40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter N, Parts 405-471. 30. Federal Regulations shall mean any applicable provision of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also known as the Clean Water Act, as amended, Title 33, United States Code, Section 1251 and following, and any regulation promulgated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under Title 40 CFR implementing that act. 31. Floor Area shall mean the area included within the surrounding exterior walls of a building or portion thereof, exclusive of ramps, docks, vent shafts, and courts. The floor area of a building, or portion thereof, not provided with surrounding exterior walls shall be the usable area under the horizontal projection of the roof or floor above. 32. Flow Monitoring Facilities shall mean equipment and structures provided at the user's expense to measure, totalize, and/or record, the incoming water to the facility or the wastewater discharged to the sewer. 33. General Manager shall mean the individual duly designated by the Board of Directors of the District to administer this Ordinance (REFER TO SECTION 107). 34. Grab Sample shall mean a sample taken from a waste stream on a one-time basis' without regard to the flow in the waste stream and without consideration of time. 35. Industrial User shall mean any user that discharges industrial wastewater. 36. Industrial Wastewater shall mean all liquid -carried wastes and wastewater of the community, excluding domestic wastewater, and shall include all wastewater from any producing, manufacturing, processing, agricultural, or other operation. These may also include wastes of human origin similar to domestic wastewaters. 7 37.• Infectious Waste shall mean materials which are likely to transmit etiologic agents which cause, or significantly contribute to the cause of, increased morbidity or mortality of human beings, as more specifically set forth in Health and Safety Code Section 25117.5. 38. Inspector shall mean a person authorized by the General Manager to inspect any existing or proposed wastewater generation, conveyance, processing, and disposal facilities. 39. Interference shall mean any discharge which, alone or in conjunction with discharges from other sources, inhibits or disrupts the District's treatment processes or operations, or its sludge processes, use, or disposal; or is a cause of violation of the District's NPDES permit or prevents lawful sludge use or disposal. 40. LEL (Lower Explosive Limit) shall mean the minimum concentration of a combustible gas or vapor in air (usually expressed in percent by volume at sea level) which will ignite if an ignition source (sufficient ignition energy) is present. 41. Local Sewerina Agency shall mean any public agency or private corporation responsible for the collection and disposal of wastewater to the District's sewerage facilities duly authorized under the laws of the State of California to construct and/or maintain public sewers. 42. Manor Violation shall mean a discharge over the permitted discharge limit, as determined by the result of a composite sample analysis, as follows: a) a discharge exceeding a mass emission limit by 20% or more, or b) a discharge exceeding a concentration limit by 20% or more, or c) a pH discharge less than 5.0. 43. Mass Emission Rate shall mean the weight of material discharged to the sewer system during a given time interval. Unless otherwise specified, the mass emission rate shall mean pounds per day of a particular constituent or combination of constituents. 44. may shall mean permissive. 45. Medical Waste shall mean the discharge of isolation wastes, infectious agents, human blood and blood byproducts, pathological wastes, sharps, body parts, fomites, etiologic agents, contaminated bedding, surgical wastes, potentially contaminated laboratory wastes, and dialysis wastes. 46. milligrams •Per Liter (ma/L) shall mean a unit of the concentration of water or wastewater constituent. It is 1 gram of the constituent in 1,000 liters of water. It has replaced the unit formerly used, parts per million, to which it is approximately equivalent in reporting the results of water and wastewater analysis. 47. Minor Violation shall mean a discharge over the permitted discharge limit as determined by the result of a composite sample analysis, as follows: 8 a) a discharge exceeding a mass emission limit by less than 20%, or b) a discharge exceeding a concentration limit by less than 20%, or c) a pH discharge equal to or greater than 5.0, but less than 6.0, or d) a pH discharge greater than 12.0. 48. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) shall mean the permit issued to control the discharge to surface waters of the United States as detailed in Public Law 92-500, Section 402. 49. New Construction shall mean any structure planned or under construction for which a connection permit has not been issued. 50. New Source shall mean those sources that are new as defined by 40 CFR 403.3(k) as revised. 51. Non -Compatible Pollutant shall mean any pollutant which is not a compatible pollutant as defined herein. 52. Normal Working Day shall mean the period of time during which production or operation is taking place or any period during which discharge to the sewer is occurring. 53. Operation and Maintenance Service Charge shall mean a charge imposed on a user of the sewerage facilities, pursuant to Sections 302.6(F)1, 303.6(F)l or 304.6(B)l of this Ordinance, which may be used to recover the costs of operation and maintenance, which charges shall be allocated to the District's Operating Fund. 54. Ordinance shall mean that document entitled "Wastewater Discharge Regulations" containing District requirements, conditions, and limits for connecting and -discharging to the sewer system, as may be amended and modified. 55. PH shall mean both acidity and alkalinity on a scale ranging from 0 to 14 where 7 represents neutrality, numbers less than 7 increasing acidity, and more than 7 increasing alkalinity, and is the logarithm of the reciprocal of the quantity of hydrogen ions in moles per liter of solution. 56. Pass Through shall mean discharge through the Districts' sewerage facilities to waters of the U.S. which, alone or in conjunction with discharges from other sources, is a cause of a violation of the Districts' NPDES permit. 57. Permittee shall mean a person who has received a permit to discharge wastewater into the District's sewerage facilities subject to the requirements and conditions established by the District. 58. Person shall mean any individual, partnership, firm, association, corporation or public agency, including the State of California and the United States of America. 59. Pesticides shall mean those compounds classified as such under Federal or State law or regulations including, but not limited to those listed in Section 209.8.4 �7 60.• Pollutant shall mean any constituent or characteristic of wastewaters on which a discharge limit may be .imposed either by the District or the regulatory bodies empowered to regulate the District. 61. Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) shall mean those compounds classified as such under Federal or State law including, but not limited to those listed in Section 209.B.3 62. Pretreatment shall mean the reduction of the amount of pollutants, the elimination of pollutants, or the alteration of the nature of pollutant properties in wastewater to a level authorized by the District prior to discharge of the wastewater into the District's system. The reduction or alteration can be obtained by physical, chemical or biological process, or process changes by other means. 63. Pretreatment Facility shall mean any works or devices that the General Manager determines are appropriate to treat, restrict, or prevent the flow of industrial wastewater prior to discharge into a public sewer. 64. Priority Pollutants shall mean the most recently adopted list of toxic pollutants identified and listed by EPA as having the greatest environmental impact. They are classified as non -compatible pollutants and may require pretreatment prior to discharge in order to prevent: a) interference with the District's operation; or b) sludge contamination; or c) pass through into receiving waters or into the atmosphere. 65. Public Agency shall mean the State of California and any city, county, district, other local authority or public body of or within this State. 66. Public Sewer shall mean a sewer owned and operated by the District, a city or other local sewering agency which is tributary to the Districts' sewerage facilities. 67. RCRA shall mean Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (42 U.S.C. 6901, et seq.) and as amended. 68. Regulatory Agencies shall mean those agencies having Jurisdiction over the operation of the District including, but not limited to, the following: a) United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, San Francisco and Washington, DC (EPA). b) California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). c) California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region (RWQCB). d) South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). e) California Department of Health Services (DOHS). 69. Regulatory Compliance Schedule Agreement (RCSAI shall mean an agreement between the District and permittee requiring the permittee to implement pretreatment practices and/or install 10 equipment to ensure compliance with future revised categorical pretreatment standards or revised discharge limits. 70. Sample Point shall mean a location approved by the District, from which wastewater can be collected that is representative in content and consistency of the entire flow of wastewater being sampled. 71. Sampling Facilities shall mean structure(s) provided at the user's expense for the District or user to measure and record wastewater constituent mass, concentrations, collect a representative sample, or provide access to plug or terminate the discharge. 72. Sanitary Waste shall mean domestic wastewater, human excrement and gray water (household showers, dishwashing operations, etc). 73. Septic Waste shall mean any sewerage from holding tanks such as chemical toilets, campers, trailers, and septic tanks. 74. Sewage shall mean wastewater. 75. Sewerage Facilities or system shall mean any and all facilities used for collecting, conveying, pumping, treating, and disposing of wastewater and sludge. 76. Shall means mandatory. 77. Significant Non -Compliance (SNC) shall mean the compliance status of an industrial user who is in violation of one or more of the following criteria: a) chronic violations of discharge limits. Defined as occurring when 66 percent or more of all measurements taken during a six-month period exceed the daily maximum or the average limit for the same pollutant; b) acute violations of discharge limits. Defined as occurring when 33 percent or more of all measurements taken during a six-month period equal or exceed the product of the daily average maximum limit or the average limit times the applicable Technical Review Criteria (TRC) for BOD, TSS, fats, oil and grease. TRC = 1.4 for BOD, TSS, fats, and oil and grease. The TRC for all other pollutants except.pH = 1.2. c) any other violation of a pretreatment effluent limit that the District determines has caused, either alone or in combination with other discharges, interference or pass through; d) any discharge of a pollutant that has caused imminent endangerment to human health, welfare, or the environment or has resulted in the Districts' exercise of its emergency authorities; e ) exceeding by 90 days or more the scheduled date of a compliance schedule milestone contained in an ECSA, RCSA, probation order, or other enforcement order, for starting construction, completing construction, or for attaining final compliance; f) failure to provide required reports including but not limited to periodic self -monitoring reports and reports 11 on compliance with compliance schedules within 30 days of the due date; g) failure to accurately report non-compliance with discharge limits or any other requirements applicable to the user pursuant to this Ordinance; or h) any other violation or group of violations that the District determines will adversely affect the operation or implementation of the District's pretreatment program. 78. Slug Load shall mean a discharge that exceeds the prohibitions stated in Section 209 and significantly exceeds the usual user flow or pollutant loading, either mass or concentration. 79. Sludge shall mean any solid, semi -solid or liquid decant, subnate or supernate from a manufacturing process, utility service, or pretreatment facility. 80. Special Purpose User shall mean any discharger who is granted a Special Purpose Discharge Permit by the District to discharge unpolluted water, storm runoff, or groundwater to the District's sewerage facilities. 81. Spent Solutions shall mean any concentrated industrial wastewater. 82. Spill Containment shall mean a protection system installed by the permittee to prohibit the discharge to the sewer of non -compatible pollutants. 83. Standard Industrial Classification (S.I.C.) shall mean a system of classifying industries as identified in the S.I.C. Manual, 1987, or subsequent edition, as prepared by the Office of Management and Budget. 84. Standard Methods shall mean procedures described in the current edition of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, as published by the American Public Health Association, the American Water Works Association and Water Pollution Control Federation. 85. Suspended•Solids shall mean any insoluble material contained as a component of wastewater and capable of separation from the liquid portion of said waste by laboratory filtration as determined by the appropriate testing procedure and expressed in terms of milligrams per liter. 86. Tax Credit shall mean that portion of the basic levy on the discharger's County of Orange Ad Valorem Tax Bill allocated to the District. The basic levy does not include taxes for bonded indebtedness. 87. Total Organic Carbon (TOC) shall mean the measure of total organic carbon in domestic or other wastewater as determined by the appropriate testing procedure. 88. Unpolluted Water shall mean water to which no pollutant has been added either intentionally or accidentally. 89. User shall mean any person who discharges or causes a discharge of wastewater directly or indirectly to a public sewer. User shall mean the same as Discharger or Industrial User. 12 90- Waste shall mean sewage and any and all other waste substances, liquid, solid, gaseous or radioactive, associated with human habitation or of human or animal nature, including such wastes placed within containers of whatever nature prior to and for the purpose of disposal. 91. Waste Manifest shall mean that receipt which is retained by the generator of hazardous wastes as required by the State of California or the United States Government pursuant to RCRA, or the California Hazardous Materials Act, or that receipt which is retained by the generator for recyclable wastes or liquid non -hazardous wastes as required by the District. 92. Wastehauler shall mean any person carrying on or engaging in vehicular transport of waste as part of, or incidental to, any business for the purpose of discharging said waste into the District's system. 93. Wastewater shall mean the liquid and water -carried wastes of the community and all constituents thereof, whether treated or untreated, discharged into or permitted to enter a public sewer. 94. Wastewater Constituents and Characteristics shall mean the individual chemical, physical, bacteriological, and radiological parameters, including volume and flow rate and such other parameters that serve to define, classify or measure the quality and quantity of wastewater. B. Words used in this Ordinance in the singular may include the plural and the plural the singular. Use of masculine shall mean feminine and use of feminine shall mean masculine. Shall is mandatory; may is permissive or discretionary. 103. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION All user information and data on file with the District shall be available to the public and governmental agencies without restriction unless the user specifically requests and is able to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the District that the release of such information would divulge information, processes or methods which would be detrimental to the user's competitive position. The demonstration of the need for confidentiality made by the permittee must meet the burden necessary for withholding such information from the general public under applicable State and Federal Law. Any such claim must be made at the time of submittal of the information by marking the submittal "Confidential Business Information" on each page containing such information. Information which is demonstrated to be confidential shall not be transmitted to anyone other than a governmental agency without prior notification to the user. Information concerning wastewater quality and quantity will not be deemed confidential. 13 104. TRANSFER OF PERMITS A. Permits issued under this Ordinance are for a specific user, for a specific operation at a specific location or for a specific wastehauler, and create no vested rights. 1. No permit may be transferred to allow a discharge to a public sewer from a point other than the location for which the permit was originally issued. 2. Except as expressly set forth herein, no permit for an existing facility may be transferred to a new owner and/or operator of that facility. B. At least thirty (30) days prior to the sale or transfer of ownership of any business operating under a permit issued by the District, the permittee shall notify the District in writing of the proposed sale or transfer. The successor owner shall apply to the District for a new permit at least fifteen (15) days prior to the sale or transfer of ownership in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance. A successor owner shall not discharge any wastewater for which a permit is required by this Ordinance until a permit is issued by the District to the successor owner. C. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the District may, in its discretion, allow the transfer of a permit to a new owner and/or operator, at the same location for which the permit was originally issued, if: 1. The existing permittee and the proposed new owner and/or operator provide the District with written notification of the intended transfer at least thirty (30) days in advance of the transfer date; and 2. The District approves, in writing, the permit transfer prior to commencement of operations by the new owner and/or operator. D. The written notification of intended transfer shall be in a form approved by the District and shall include a written certification by the new owner and/or operator which: 1. States that the new owner or operator has no immediate intent to modify the facility's operations and/or processes; 2. Identifies the specific date on which the transfer is to occur; and 3. Acknowledges that the new owner or operator is fully responsible for complying with the terms and conditions of the existing permit and all provisions of this Ordinance. 105. EFFECT OF TRANSFER OF PERMITS Except as expressly set forth in Section 104.C, any permit which is transferred to a new owner and/or operator or to a new facility is void. 106. AUTHORITY The District is regulated by several agencies of the United States Government and the State of California, pursuant to the provisions of Federal and State Law. Federal and State Laws grant to the District the authority to regulate and/or prohibit, by the adoption of ordinances or resolutions, and by issuance of discharge permits, the discharge of any 14 waste, directly or indirectly, to the District's sewerage facilities. Said authority includes the right to establish limits, conditions, and prohibitions; to establish flow rates or prohibit flows discharged to the District's sewerage facilities; to require the development of compliance schedules for the installation of equipment systems and materials by all users; and to take all actions necessary to enforce its authority, whether within or outside the District's boundaries, including those users that are tributary to the District or within areas for which the District has contracted to provide sewerage services. The District has the authority pursuant to California Health and Safety Codes 5471 and 5474 to prescribe, revise, and collect all fees and charge for services and facilities furnished by the District either within or without its territorial limits. 107. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY Whenever -any power is granted to or a duty is imposed • upon the General Manager, the power may be exercised or the duty may be performed by any person so authorized by the General Manager. 108. SIGNATORY REQUIREMENTS Reports and permit applications required by this Ordinance shall contain the following certification statement: "I have personally examined and am familiar with the information submitted in the attached document, and I hereby certify under penalty of law that this information was obtained in accordance with the Federal Pretreatment Requirements. Moreover, based upon my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information reported herein, I believe that the submitted information is true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment." The statement shall be signed by an authorized representative of the industrial user as defined in 40 CFR 403.12(1)(1-4). Oil ARTICLE 2 GENERAL PROHIBITIONS AND LBUTS ON DISCHARGES 201. PROHIBITED DISCHARGES A. No person shall discharge or cause to be introduced a quantity or quality of wastewater directly or indirectly to sewerage facilities owned by or tributary to the District's sewerage facilities which causes, or is capable of causing, either alone or by interaction with other substances: 1. A fire or explosion. 2. Obstruction to the flow in the sewer system resulting in interference or damage to the sewerage facilities. 3. Danger to life or safety of any person. 4. Impairment of the effective maintenance or operation of the sewerage system. S. Toxic gases, vapors, or fumes within the sewerage facilities in a quantity that may cause acute worker health and safety problems. 6. Pass through or interference. 7. The Districts' effluent to fail a toxicity, test. 8. The Districts' effluent or any other product of the treatment process, residues, sludges or scums, to be unsuitable for reclamation, reuse or disposal. 9. Discoloration, pass through, or any other condition which affects the quality of the Districts' influent or effluent in such a manner that inhibits the Districts' ability to meet receiving water quality, sludge quality, or air quality requirements established by Regulatory Agencies. 10. Excessive foaming in the sewerage facilities. 11. Conditions which violate any statute, regulation, or ordinance of any public agency or Regulatory Agency having jurisdiction over the operation of or discharge of wastewater through the sewerage facilities. B. No person shall discharge wastewater, delivered by vehicular transport, rail car, or dedicated pipeline, directly or indirectly to the Districts' sewerage facilities which wastewater contains any substance that is defined as a hazardous waste by the Regulatory Agencies. C. No person shall transport waste from one location or facility to another for the purpose of treating or discharging it directly or indirectly to the Districts' sewerage system without written permission from the District. D. No user shall increase the contribution of flow, pollutants, or change the nature of pollutants where such contribution or change does not meet applicable standards and requirements or where such 16 contribution would cause the District to violate any Federal, State, or local regulatory permit. 202. PROHIBITION ON DILUTION No user shall increase the use of water or in any other manner attempt to dilute a discharge as a partial or complete substitute for treatment to achieve compliance with this Ordinance and the user's permit or to establish an artificially high flow rate for permit mass emission rates. 203. PROHIBITION ON SURFACE RUNOFF AND GROUNDWATER A. No person shall discharge groundwater, surface runoff, or subsurface drainage directly or indirectly to the District's sewerage facilities except as provided herein. Pursuant to Section 305, et seq., the District may approve the discharge of such water only when no alternate method of disposal is reasonably available or to mitigate an environmental risk or health hazard. B. The discharge of such waters shall require a Special Purpose Discharge Permit from the District. C. If a permit is granted for the discharge of such water into a public sewer, the user shall pay the applicable charges established herein and shall meet such other conditions as required by the District. 204. PROHIBITION ON UNPOLLUTED WATER A. No person shall discharge unpolluted water such as single pass cooling water directly or indirectly to the District's sewerage facilities except as provided herein. Pursuant to Section 305, et seq., the District may approve the discharge of such water only when no alternate method of disposal or reuse is reasonably available or to mitigate an environmental risk or health hazard. B. The discharge of such waters shall require a Special Purpose Discharge Permit from the District. .C. If a permit is granted for the discharge of such water into a public sewer, the user shall pay the applicable charges established herein and shall meet such other conditions as required by the District. 205. PROHIBITION ON RADIOACTIVE WASTES No person shall discharge radioactive waste unless: A. The person is authorized to use radioactive materials by the State Department of Health or other governmental agency empowered to regulate the use of radioactive materials; and B. The waste is discharged in strict conformity with current California Radiation Control Regulations (California Code of Regulations, Title 17) for safe disposal; and C. The person is in compliance with all rules and regulations of all other applicable regulatory agencies; and D. The person has obtained a Class I permit from the District. 17 206. PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF GRINDERS Waste from industrial or commercial grinders shall not be discharged into a public sewer, except wastes generated in packing or preparing food or food products. Such grinders must shred the waste to a degree that all particles will be carried freely under normal flow conditions prevailing in the public sewer. 207. PROHIBITION ON POINT OF DISCHARGE No person, except local sewering agencies involved in maintenance functions of sanitary sewer facilities, shall discharge any wastewater directly into a manhole or other opening in a sewer other than through an approved building sewer, unless approved by the District upon written application by the user and payment of the applicable fees and charges established herein. 208. PROHIBITION ON WASTEHAULER DISCHARGES A. No wastehauler shall discharge septic waste, cesspool wastes, wastes from a vacuum pumping truck or other liquid waste transport vehicle, without first obtaining both a valid Orange County Health Department Permit and a CSDOC Wastehauler Permit as required by Section 306. Such wastewaters shall be discharged only at a location specified by the District. B. No wastehauler discharging septic waste, or sanitary waste shall discharge constituents in excess of those specified in the respective permit based on the Limits For Wastehaulers Discharging Domestic Waste in Table I. C. The discharge of industral wastewater by any wastehauler is prohibited unless written permission of the General Manager has been obtained, the proper permits have been obtained, and the waste meets Federal and State limits applicable to the user from which the waste was obtained; or Local Discharge Limits as specified in Table I, whichever are more stringent. D. No wastehauler shall discharge directly or indirectly to the sewerage facilities any material defined as hazardous waste by RCRA or 40 CFR 261. E. Upon request by the District, each wastehauler shall provide a waste manifest documenting the source of all wastewater to be discharged into the sewerage facilities. 209. LIMITS ON WASTEWATER STRENGTH AND CHARACTERISTICS A. No person shall discharge wastewater in excess of either the permitted mass emission rates established in accordance with Section 210 or the concentration limits set forth in Table I or the discharge permit. Further, no person shall discharge wastewater in excess of any applicable Federal or State discharge regulations. B. No person shall discharge wastewater: 1. Having a temperature higher than 140 degrees Fahrenheit, (60 degrees Centigrade), or which causes the temperature at the treatment plant to exceed 104 degrees Fahrenheit (40 degrees Centigrade). 2. Having a pH less than 6.0 or greater than 12.0. 18 3.- Containing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in excess of the limit as shown in Table I. PCBs include, but are not limited to the following: Aroclors 1016, 1221, 1228, 1232, 1242, 1248, 1254, 1260, and 1262. 4. Containing pesticides in excess of the limit as shown in Table I. Pesticides include, but are not limited to the following: DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloro-ethane, both isomers), DDE ( d i c h 1 o r o d i p h e n y 1- e t h y l e n e ) , D D D (dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane), Aldrin, Benzene Hexachloride (alpha (a), beta (0), and gamma isomers), Chlordane, Endrin, Endrin aldehyde, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), toxaphene, a-endosulfan, fi-endosulfan, Endosulfan sulfate, Heptachlor, Heptachlor epoxide, Dieldrin, Demeton, Guthion, Malathion, Methoxychlor, Mirex, and Parathion. S. Having a maximum Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) greater than 15,000 pounds per day; or exceeding a 30-day BOD average of 10,000 pounds per day. 6. Containing excessive flow or other materials, including, but not limited to, ammonia, chemical oxygen demand, total organic carbon, priority pollutants, suspended solids, oil and grease of animal or vegetable origin, total dissolved solids, and phenolic compounds released in a discharge at a flow rate and/or concentration which will cause problems, pass through, or interference with the sewerage facilities. 7. Producing a gaseous mixture that is 10% or greater of the lower explosive limit (LEL) or having a closed cup flashpoint of less than 140 degrees Fahrenheit or 60 degrees Centigrade using the test methods specified in 40 CFR 261.21. 8. Containing material which will readily settle or cause an obstruction to flow in the sewer resulting in interference, such as, but not limited to, sand, mud, glass, metal filings, diatomaceous earth, cat litter, asphalt, dead animals, wood, bones, hair, and fleshings. 9. In violation of any applicable Federal Categorical Pretreatment Standards, State standards or other local regulations covering wastewater disposal or operations. 210. MASS EMISSION RATE DETERMINATION A. Mass emission rates. for non -compatible or compatible pollutants that are present or anticipated in the user's wastewater discharge may be set for each user and made an applicable part of each user's permit. These rates shall be based on Table I, Local Discharge Limits, or Federal Categorical Pretreatment Standards, and the user's average daily wastewater discharge for the past three years, the most recent representative data, or other data acceptable to the General Manager. B. To verify the user's operating data, the District may require a user to submit an inventory of all wastewater streams and/or records indicating production rates. C. The District may revise limits or mass emission rates previously established in the discharger's permit at any time, based on: current or anticipated operating data of the discharger or the District; the Districts' ability to meet NPDES limits; or changes in the requirements of Regulatory Agencies. 19 D. The excess use of water to establish an artificially high flow rate for mass emission rate determination is prohibited. 211. PROHIBITION ON MEDICAL WASTE A. No person shall discharge solid wastes from hospitals, clinics, offices of medical doctors, convalescent homes, medical laboratories or other medical facilities to the sewerage system including, but not limited to, hypodermic needles, syringes, instruments, utensils or other paper and plastic items of a disposable nature except where prior written approval for such discharges is given by the General Manager. B. The District shall have the authority to require that any discharge of an infectious waste to the sewer be rendered non-infectious prior to discharge if the infectious waste is deemed to pose a threat to the public health and safety, or will result in any violation of applicable waste discharge requirements. 212. PROHIBITION ON DISPOSAL OF SPENT SOLUTIONS AND SLUDGES Spent solutions, sludges, and materials of quantity or quality in violation of, or prohibited by this Ordinance, or any permit issued under this Ordinance must be disposed of in a legal manner at a legally acceptable point of disposal as defined by the District or appropriate .Regulatory Agency. All waste manifests shall be retained for a minimum of three years, and made available to the District upon request. 20 TABLE I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY LOCAL DISCHARGE LIMITS(a) CONSTITUENT MILLIGRAMS/LITER Arsenic 2.0 Cadmium 1.0 Chromium (Total) 2.0 Copper 3.0 Lead 2.0 Mercury 0.03 Nickel 10.0 Silver 5.0 Zinc 10.0 Cyanide (Total) 5.0 Cyanide (Amenable) 1.0 Polychlorinated Biphenyls 0.01 Pesticides 0.01 Total Toxic Organics 0.58 Sulfide (Total) 5.0 Sulfide (Dissolved) 0.5 Oil and grease of mineral or petroleum origin 100.0 LIMITS FOR WASTEHAULERS DISCHARGING DOMESTIC WASTE MILLIGRAMS/LITER Cadmium 1.0 Chromium 2.0 Copper 25.0 Lead 10.0 Nickel 10.0 Zinc 50.0 (a): Users subject to Federal Categorical Pretreatment Standards may be required to meet more stringent limits. 44 ARTICLE 3 DISCHARGE PERMITS, CHARGES, AND FEES 301. INTRODUCTION A. To provide the maximum public benefit from the use of District sewerage facilities, written authorization to use said facilities is required. This written authorization shall be in the form of a discharge permit. No vested right shall be given by issuance of permits provided for in this ordinance. The District reserves the right to establish, by Ordinance or in Wastewater Discharge Permits, more stringent standards or requirements on discharges to the Districts' sewerage facilities if deemed by the General Manager appropriate to comply with the objectives presented in the Introduction and Summary of this Ordinance and the prohibitions and limitations in Article 2. B. The discharge permit shall be in one of six forms and is dependent upon the type of discharger, volume, and characteristics of discharge. The six discharge permits are: 1. Class I Wastewater Discharge Permit. 2. Class II Wastewater Discharge Permit. 3. Clash III Wastewater Discharge Permit. 4. Special Purpose Discharge Permit. 5. Wastehauler Discharge Permit. 6. Transportable Treatment Unit Discharge Permit. 302. CLASS I WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS A. No user requiring a Class I permit shall discharge wastewater without obtaining a Class I Wastewater Discharge Permit. B. Class I Wastewater Discharge Permits shall be expressly subject to all provisions of this Ordinance and all other regulations, charges for use, and fees established by the District. The conditions of Wastewater Discharge Permits shall be enforced by the District in accordance with this Ordinance and applicable State and Federal Regulations. C. All Class I users proposing to discharge directly or indirectly into the Districts' sewerage facilities shall obtain a Wastewater Discharge Permit by filing an application pursuant to Section 302.1 and paying the applicable fees pursuant to Section 302.3. For purposes of this Ordinance, a Class I user is any user: 1. Subject to Federal Categorical Pretreatment Standards; or 22 2. Discharging wastewater which averages 25,000 gallons per day or more of regulated process water; or 3. Discharging wastewater determined by the Districts to have a reasonable potential for adversely affecting the Districts' operation or for violating any pretreatment standard, local limits, or discharge requirement; or 4. Discharging wastewater which may cause, as determined by the General Manager, pass through or interference with the District's system. 302.1 Class I Wastewater Discharge Permit Application A. Any person required to obtain a Class I Wastewater Discharge Permit shall complete and file with the District, prior to commencing discharge, an application on the form prescribed by the District. The applicant shall submit, in units and terms appropriate for evaluation, the following information: 1. Name, address, assessor's parcel number(s), S.I.C. number(s), description of the manufacturing process or service activity. 2. (Whichever is applicable) name, address of any and all principals/owners/major shareholders of company; Articles of Incorporation; most recent Report of the Secretary of State; Business License. 3. Volume of wastewater to be discharged. 4.- Name of individual who can be served with notices other than officers of corporation. 5. Name and address of property owner, landlord and/or manager of the property. 6. Water supplier and water account numbers. 7. Wastewater constituents and characteristics as required by the District, including, but not limited to, those mentioned in Section 210, Mass Emission Rate Determination, and Table I, Local Discharge Limits, of this Ordinance. These constituents and characteristics shall be determined by a laboratory selected by the discharger and acceptable to the District. 8. Time and duration of discharge. 9. Number of employees and average hours of work per employee per day. 10.. Waste minimization and water conservation practices. 11. Production records, if applicable. 12. Waste manifests, if applicable. 13. Landscaped area in square feet, if applicable. 14. Tons of cooling tower capacity, if applicable. 15. EPA Hazardous Waste Generator Number, if applicable. 23 s 16. Any other information as specified. B. Applicants. may be required to submit site plans, floor, plans, mechanical and plumbing plans, and details to show all sewers, spill containment, clarifiers, pretreatment equipment, and appurtenances by size, location, and elevation for evaluation. C. Applicants may also be required to submit information related to the applicant's business operations, processes, and potential discharge as may be requested by the District to properly evaluate the permit application. D. After evaluation of the data, the District may issue a Wastewater Discharge Permit, subject to terms and conditions set forth in this Ordinance and as otherwise determined by the General Manager to be appropriate to protect the District's sewerage facilities. E. The permit application may be denied if the applicant fails to establish to the District's satisfaction that adequate pretreatment equipment is included within the applicant's plans to ensure that the discharge limits will be met or if the applicant has, in the past, demonstrated an inability to comply with applicable discharge limits. 302.2 Class I Permit Conditions, and Limits A. A Class I permit shall contain all of the following conditions or limits: 1. Mass emission rates and concentration limits regulating non -compatible pollutants. 2. Requirements to notify the District in writing prior to modification to processes or operations through which industrial wastewater may be produced. 3. Location of the user's on -site sampling point. 4. Requirements for submission of technical reports, production data, discharge reports, and/or waste manifests. 5. Requirements for maintaining, for a minimum of three years, plant records relating to wastewater discharge, and waste manifests as specified by District. 6. Requirements to submit copies of tax and water bills. B. A Class I permit may contain any of the following conditions or limits: 1. Requirements for the user to construct and maintain, at his own expense, appropriate pretreatment equipment, pH control, flow monitoring facilities, and sampling facilities. 2. Limits on rate and time of discharge or requirements for flow regulation and equalization. 3. Requirements to self -monitor. 4. Assumed values for BOD and suspended solids characteristics that typify the discharger's effluent for determination of the charge for use. 24 5. Other terms and conditions which may be appropriate to ensure compliance with this Ordinance. 6. Other terms and conditions determined by the General Manager to be appropriate to protect the sewerage system. 302.3 Class I Permit Fee A. The Class I permit fee shall be in an amount adopted by resolution of the Board of Directors. The permit fee shall be payable at the time a permit application is submitted for the issuance of a new permit or a renewed permit. Payment of permit must be received by the District prior to issuance of either a new permit or a renewed permit. Permittee shall also pay any delinquent invoices in full prior to permit renewal. B. Any permit issued for a location wherein the Permittee is not the property owner may be conditioned upon depositing financial security to guarantee payment of all annual fees and charges to be incurred, in accordance with the provisions of Section 621.(E) of this Ordinance. 302.4 Class I Permit Modification of Terms and Conditions A. The terms and conditions of an issued permit may be subject to modification and change in the sole determination by the General Manager during the life of the permit based on: 1. The discharger's current or anticipated operating data; 2. The District's current or anticipated operating data; 3. Changes in the requirements of Regulatory Agencies which affect the District; or 4. A determination by the General Manager that such modification is appropriate to further the objectives of this Ordinance. B. New source indirect dischargers shall be required to install and start up any necessary pollution control equipment before beginning discharge, and comply with applicable Federal Categorical Pretreatment Standards not to exceed thirty (30) days after the commencement of discharge. C. Permittee may request a modification to the terms and conditions of an issued permit. The request shall be in writing stating the requested change, and the reasons for the change. The Districts shall review the request, make a determination on the request, and respond in writing. D. Permittee shall be informed of any change in the permit limitations, conditions, or requirements at least forty-five (45) days prior to the effective date of change. Any changes or new conditions in the permit shall include a reasonable time schedule for compliance. 25 302.5 Class I Permit Duration and Renewal 302.6 Class I permits shall normally be issued for a period not to exceed two (2) years. At least 45 days prior to the expiration of the permit, the user shall apply for renewal of the permit in accordance with the provisions of this Article 3. Class I Permit Charge for Use A. The purpose of a charge for use is to ensure that each recipient of sewerage service from the District pays its reasonably proportionate share of all the costs of providing that sewerage service. Charges for use to recover the cost of conveying, treating, and disposing of sewage in District facilities are exclusive of any fees levied by local sewering agencies. The charge for use shall be based on the total maintenance, operation, capital expenditures, and reserve requirements for providing wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal. B. A discharger who is issued a Class I Wastewater Discharge Permit under the provisions of this ordinance shall pay a charge for use in accordance with the formula contained herein and the unit charge rates adopted annually by resolution of the Board of Directors. These fees shall be invoiced on a quarterly basis. The quarterly invoice shall be based upon an estimate of the annual use as determined by the District. Annually, the District shall compute the charge for use based upon actual use for the preceding 12-month period on an annual reconciliation statement. The charge for use is payable. within forty-five (45) days of invoicing by the District. A credit will be allowed for the annual ad valorem tax basic levy allocated to the District for the property for which a permit has been issued by the District. A credit will also be allowed for any supplemental user fee adopted by the Board of Directors by separate ordinance. C. Current property tax bills shall be supplied by the permittee to the District by May 31 of each year for use in determining the ad valorem tax credit and/or the supplemental user fee credit. If the tax bills are not supplied, the District will endeavor to obtain the data. Data obtained by the District will be considered correct and will not be adjusted before the next annual reconciliation statement. There shall be a fee levied for District administrative costs when ad valorem property tax or supplemental user fee data are obtained by the District. The amount of the fee shall be adopted by the District's Board of Directors. D. So the District may determine actual annual water use, the user shall provide to the District copies of its water bills. If these water bill copies are not received by July 31 of each year for the 12-month period ended closest to June 30, the District will endeavor to obtain the water use data. Data obtained by the District will be considered correct and will not be adjusted before the next annual reconciliation statement. There shall be a fee levied for District administrative costs when water use data is obtained by the District. The amount of the fee shall be adopted by the District's Board of Directors. E. The charge for use shall be computed by the following formula: Charge for Use = V.V + B.B + S.S - Tax Credit Where V = total annual volume of flow, in millions of gallons B = total annual discharge of biochemical oxygen demand, in thousands of pounds 26 i S = total annual discharge of suspended solids, in thousands of pounds V,,B,,S, = unit charge rates established and adopted by resolution of the District's Board of Directors, based upon the funding requirements of providing sewerage service, in dollars per unit as described in Paragraph F below: F. The unit charge rates in the charge -for -use formula shall be determined by the following method: 1. An Operations and Maintenance Service Charge for the total annual operation and maintenance funding requirements of the sewerage system shall be allocated among the three wastewater charge parameters of flow, biochemical oxygen demand and suspended solids in accordance with the General Manager's determination as to the costs associated with each parameter and pursuant to applicable requirements of State and Federal Regulatory Agencies. The operation and maintenance costs as distributed to flow, biochemical oxygen demand and suspended solids shall be divided by the projected annual total flow volume and weights of biochemical oxygen demand and suspended solids to be treated by the sewerage system in the budgeted year. 2. A Capital Facilities Replacement Service charge for capital replacement and capital improvement shall be levied at a rate to be determined annually the Board of Directors. This charge shall be allocated among wastewater charge parameters of flow, biochemical oxygen demand, and susspended solids in accordance with the General Manager's determination of which portion of the charge predominantly relates to each parameter. The capital facilities charge distributed to biochemical oxygen demand, and suspended solids shall be divided!by the projected annual weights of biochemical oxygen demand and suspended solids to be treated by the sewerage system in the budgeted year. 3. The unit charge rates for each respective wastewater parameter in (1) and (2) above shall be summed. The unit wastewater charge rates so determined Will be expressed in dollars per million gallons for V,, and in dollars per thousand pounds for B, and S,. G. Other measurements of the organic content of the wastewater of a discharger, such as COD or TOC, may be used instead of BOD. However, the discharger must establish to the General Manager's satisfaction a relationship between the BOD of the wastewater' and the parameter of measure. This relationship shall be used by the District in determining the charge for use. When wastewater from sanitary facilities is discharged separately from the other wastewater of a discharger, the charge for use for discharging the sanitary wastewater may be determined by using the following: 1. 25 gallons per employee per eight -hour working day. 2. BOD and suspended solids to be calculated at domestic wastewater strength per employee per year. 27 The number of employees will be considered as the average number of people employed full-time on a daily basis. This may be determined by averaging the number of people employed at the beginning and end of each quarter, or other period that reflects normal employment fluctuations. 303. CLASS II 'WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS A. No user requiring a Class II permit shall discharge wastewater without obtaining a Wastewater Discharge Permit. B. Class II Wastewater Discharge Permits shall be expressly subject to all provisions of this Ordinance and all other regulations, charges for use and fees established by the District. The conditions of Wastewater Discharge Permits shall be enforced by the District in accordance with this Ordinance and applicable State and Federal Regulations. C. All Class II users proposing to discharge directly or indirectly into the District sewerage facilities shall obtain a Wastewater discharge Permit by filing an application pursuant to Section 303.1 and paying the applicable fees pursuant to Section 303.3. For purposes of this Ordinance, a Class II user is any user: D. Whose charge for use is greater than the ad valorem tax basic levy allocated to the District; and 2. Discharging waste other than sanitary; and 3. Not otherwise required to obtain a Class I permit. 303.1 Class II Wastewater Discharge Permit Application A. Any person required to obtain a Class II Wastewater Discharge Permit shall complete and file with the District, prior to commencing discharge, an application on the form prescribed by the District. The applicant shall submit, in units and terms appropriate for evaluation, the following information: 1. Name, address, assessor's parcel number(s) and S.I.C. number (s); description of the manufacturing process or service activity. 2. (Whichever is applicable) Name, address of any and all principals/owners/major shareholders of company; Articles of Incorporation; most recent Report of the Secretary of State; Business License. 3. Volume of wastewater to be discharged. 4. Name of individual who can be served with notices other than officers of corporation. S. Name and address of property owner, landlord and/or manager of the property. 6. Water supplier and water account numbers. 7. Wastewater constituents and characteristics as required by the District, including, but not limited to, those mentioned 28 in Section 210, Mass Emission Rate Determination, and Table I, Local Discharge Limits of this Ordinance. These constituents and .characteristics shall be determined by a laboratory selected by the discharger and acceptable to the District. 8. Time and duration of discharge. 9. Number of employees and average hours of work per employee per day. 10. Waste minimization and water conservation practices. 11. Production records, if applicable. 12. Waste manifests, if applicable. 13. Landscaped area in square feet, if applicable. 14. Tons of cooling tower capacity, if applicable. 15. EPA Hazardous Waste Generator Number, if applicable. 16. Any other information as specified. B. Applicants may be required to submit site plans, floor plans, mechanical and plumbing plans, and details to show all sewers, spill containment, clarifiers, pretreatment systems, and appurtenances by size, location, and elevation for evaluation. C. Applicants may also be required to submit other information related to the applicant's business operations, processes, and potential discharge as may be requested to properly evaluate the permit application. D. After evaluation of the data furnished, the District may issue a Wastewater Discharge Permit, subject to terms and conditions set forth in this Ordinance and as otherwise determined by the General Manager to be appropriate to protect the District's system. E. The permit application may be denied if the applicant fails to establish to the Districts' satisfaction that adequate pretreatment equipment is included within the applicant's plans to ensure that the discharge limits will be met or if the applicant has, in the past, demonstrated an inability to comply with applicable discharge limits. 303.2 Class II Permit Conditions, and Limits A. A Class II permit shall contain all of the following conditions or limits: 1. Requirements to notify the District in writing prior to modification to processes or operations through which industrial wastewater may be produced. 2. Location of the user's on -site sample point. 3. Requirements for submission of technical reports, production data, discharge reports, and/or waste manifests. 4. Requirements to submit copies of tax and water bills. 29 B. A Class II permit may contain any of the following conditions or limits: 1. Requirements for the user to construct and maintain, at his own expense, appropriate pretreatment equipment, pH control, flow monitoring and/or sampling facilities. 2. Limits on rate and time of discharge or requirements for flow regulation and equalization. 3. Assumed values for BOD and suspended solids characteristics that typify the discharger's effluent for determination of the charge for use. 4. Requirements to self -monitor. 5. Requirements for maintaining, for a minimum of three years, plant records relating to wastewater discharge, and waste manifests as specified by District. 6. Other provisions which may be appropriate to ensure compliance with this Ordinance. 7. Other terms and conditions determined by the General Manager to be appropriate to protect the District's system. 303.3 Class II Permit Fee A. The Class II permit fee shall be in an amount adopted by resolution of the Board of Directors. The permit fee shall be payable at the time a permit application is submitted for the issuance of a new permit or a renewed permit. Payment of permit must be received by the District prior to issuance of either a new permit or a renewed permit. Permittee shall also pay any delinquent invoices in full prior to permit renewal. B. Any permit issued for a location wherein the Permittee is not the property owner may be conditioned upon depositing financial security to guarantee payment of all annual fees and charges to be incurred, in accordance with the provisions of Section 621.(E) of this Ordinance. 303.4 Class II Permit Modification of Terms and Conditions A. The terms and conditions of an issued permit may be subject to modification and change in the sole determination by the General Manager during the life of the permit based on: 1. The discharger's current or anticipated operating data; 2. The District's current or anticipated operating data; 3. Changes in the requirements- of Regulatory Agencies which affect the District; or 4. A determination by the General Manager that such modification is appropriate to further the objectives of this Ordinance. B. The permittee shall request a modification to the terms and conditions of an issued permit prior to increasing the contribution of flow, pollutants, or changing the nature of pollutants where such contribution or change will cause the permittee to be in violation 30 of their permit or this Ordinance. The request shall be in writing stating the requested change, and the reasons for the change. The District shall review the request, make a determination, on the request, and respond in writing. The Districts' approval may be granted or denied. C. Permittee shall be informed of any change in the permit limitations, conditions, or requirements at least forty-five (45) days prior to the effective date of change. Any changes or new conditions in the permit shall include a reasonable time schedule for compliance. 303.5 Class II Permit Duration and Renewal Class II permits shall be issued for a period not to exceed three (3) years. At least 45 days prior to the expiration of the permit, The user shall apply for renewal of the permit in accordance with the provisions of this Article 3. 303.6 Class II Permit Charge for Use A. The purpose of a charge for use is to ensure that each recipient of sewerage service from the District pays its reasonably proportionate share of all the costs of providing that sewerage service. Charges for use to recover the cost of conveying, treating, and disposing of sewage in District sewerage facilities are exclusive of any fees levied by local sewering agencies. The charge for use shall be based on the total maintenance, operation, capital expenditures, and reserve requirements for providing wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal. B. A discharger who is issued a Class II Wastewater Discharge Permit under the provisions of this Ordinance shall pay a charge for use in accordance with the formula contained herein and the unit charge rates adopted annually by resolution of the Board of Directors. These fees shall be invoiced on a quarterly basis. The quarterly invoice shall be based upon an estimate of the annual use as determined by the District. Annually, the District shall compute the charge for use based upon actual use for the preceding 12-month period on an annual reconciliation statement. The charge for use is payable within forty-five (45) days of invoicing by the District. A credit will be allowed for the annual ad valorem tax basic levy allocated to the District for the property for which a permit has been issued by the District. A credit will also be allowed for any supplemental user fee adopted by the Board of Directors by separate ordinance. C. Current property tax bills shall be supplied by the permittee to the District by May 31 of each year for use in determining the ad valorem tax credit and/or the supplemental user fee credit. If the tax bills are not supplied, the District will endeavor to obtain the data. Data obtained by the District will be considered correct and will not be adjusted before the next annual reconciliation statement. There shall be a fee levied for District administrative costs when ad valorem property tax or supplemental user fee data is obtained by the District. The amount of the fee shall be adopted by the District's Board of Directors. D. So the District may determine actual annual water use, the user shall provide to the District copies of its water bills. If these water bill copies are not received by July 31 of each year for the 12-month period ended closest to June 30, the District will endeavor to obtain the water use data. Data obtained by the District will 31 be considered correct and will not be adjusted before the next annual reconciliation statement. There shall be a fee levied for District administrative costs when water use data is obtained by the District. The amount of the fee shall be adopted by the District's Board of Directors. E. The charge for use shall be computed by the following formula: Charge for Use = V,V + B,B + S,S - Tax Credit Where V = total annual volume of flow, in millions of gallons B = total annual discharge of biochemical oxygen demand, in thousands of pounds S = total annual discharge of suspended solids, in thousands of pounds V,,B,,S, = unit charge rates adopted annually by resolution of the District's Board of Directors, based upon the funding requirements of providing sewerage service, in dollars per unit as described in Paragraph F below. F. The unit charge rates in the charge for use formula shall be established annually and shall be determined by the following method: 1. An Operations and Maintenance Service Charge for the total annual operation and maintenance funding requirements of the sewerage system shall be allocated among the three wastewater charge parameters of flow, biochemical oxygen demand and suspended solids yin accordance with the General Manager's determination as to the costs associated with each parameter and pursuant to applicable requirements of State and Federal Regulatory Agencies. The operation and maintenance costs as distributed to flow, biochemical oxygen demand and suspended solids shall be divided by the projected annual total flow volume and weights of biochemical oxygen demand and suspended solids to be treated by the sewerage system in the budgeted year. 2. A Capital Facilities Replacement Service Charge for capital replacement and capital improvement shall be levied at a rate to be determined annually by the Board of Directors. This charge shall. be allocated among'the three wastewater charge parameters of flow, biochemical oxygen demand and suspended solids in accordance with the General Manager's determination of which portion -of the charge predominantly relates to each parameter. The capital facilities charge distributed to biochemical oxygen demand and suspended solids shall be divided by the projected annual weights of biochemical oxygen demand and suspended solids to be treated by the sewerage system in the budgeted year. 3. The unit charge rates for each respective wastewater parameter in (1) and (2) above shall be summed. The unit wastewater charge rates so determined will be expressed in dollars per million gallons for V,, and in dollars per thousand pounds for B, and S,. G. Other measurements of the organic content of the wastewater of a discharger, such as COD or TOC, may be used instead of BOD. I* However, the discharger must establish to the General Manager's satisfaction a relationship between the BOD of the wastewater and the other parameter of measure. This relationship shall be used by the District in determining the charge for use. When wastewater from sanitary facilities is discharged separately from the other wastewater of a discharger, the charge for use for discharging the sanitary wastewater may be determined by using the following: 1. 25 gallons per employee per eight -hour working day. 2. BOD and suspended solids to be calculated at domestic wastewater strength per employee per year. The number of employees will be considered as the average number of people employed full-time on a daily basis. This may be determined by averaging the number of people employed at the beginning and end of each quarter, or other period that reflects normal employment fluctuations. 304. CLASS III WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS A. No user requiring a Class III permit shall discharge wastewater without a Class III Wastewater Discharge Permit. B. Class III Wastewater Discharge Permits shall be expressly subject to all provisions of this Ordinance and all other regulations, charges for use and fees established by the District. The conditions of Wastewater Discharge Permits shall be enforced by the District in accordance with this Ordinance and applicable State and Federal Regulations. C. All Class III users proposing to discharge into a public sewer shall obtain a Wastewater Discharge Permit by filing an application pursuant to Section 304.1 and paying the applicable fees pursuant to Section 304.3 before discharging. For purposes of this Ordinance, a Class III user is any user: 1. Discharging only sanitary waste; and 2. Not required to obtain a Class I or Class II permit; and 3. Whose charge for use is greater than the ad valorem basic levy tax paid to the District. D. Unless otherwise stipulated in the permit, Class III users shall be considered to discharge a domestic waste equivalent for BOD and suspended solids. 304.1 Class III Wastewater Discharge Permit Application A. Any person required to obtain a Class III Wastewater Discharge Permit shall complete and file with the District, prior to commencing discharge, an application on the form prescribed by the District. The applicant shall submit, in units and terms appropriate for evaluation, the following information: 1. Name, address, assessor's parcel number(s), S.I.C. number(s), description of the manufacturing process or service activity. 2. (whichever is applicable) name, address of any and all principals/owners/major shareholders of company; Articles of 33 Incorporation; most recent Report of the Secretary of State; Business License. 3. Volume of wastewater to be discharged. 4. Name of individual who can be served with notices other than officers of corporation. 5. Name and address of property owner, landlord and/or manager of the property. 6. Water supplier and water account numbers. 7. Time and duration of discharge. S. Water conservation practices. 9. Tons of cooling tower capacity. 10. Number of employees and average hours of work per employee per day. 11. Landscaped area in square feet, if applicable. 12. Any other information as specified. B. Applicants may be required to submit site plans, floor plans, mechanical and plumbing plans, and details to show all sewers, spill containment, clarifiers, pretreatment systems, and appurtenances by size, location, and elevation for evaluation. C. Applicants may also be required to submit other information related to the applicant's business operations, processes, and potential discharge as may be requested to properly evaluate the permit application. D. After evaluation of the data furnished, the District may issue a Wastewater Discharge Permit, subject to terms and conditions set forth in this Ordinance and as otherwise determined by the General Manager to be appropriate to protect the District's system. 304.2 Class III Permit Conditions and Limits A. A Class III permit shall contaiw all of the following conditions or limits: 1. Requirement to submit tax and water bills. B. A Class III permit may contain any of the following conditions or limits: 1. Assumed values for BOD and suspended solids characteristics that typify the discharge's effluent for determination of the charge for use. 2. Other terms and conditions which may be applicable to ensure compliance with this Ordinance. 3. Other terms and conditions determined by the General Manager to be necessary to protect the Districts' system. 304.3 Class III Permit Fee A. The Class III permit fee shall be in an amount adopted by resolution of the Board of Directors. The permit fee shall be payable within 34 forty-five (45) days of invoicing by the District. Payment of permit fees must be received by the District prior to issuance of either a new permit or a renewed permit. Permittee shall also pay any delinquent invoices in full prior to permit renewal. B. Any permit issued for a location wherein the Permittee is not the property owner may be conditioned upon depositing financial security to guarantee payment of all annual fees and charges to be incurred, in accordance with the provisions of Section 621.(E) of this Ordinance. 304.4 Class III Permit Modification of Terms and Conditions A. The terms -and conditions of an issued permit may be subject to modification and change in the sole determination by the District during the life of the permit based on: 1. The discharger's current or anticipated operating data; 2. The District's current or anticipated operating data; 3. Changes in the requirements of Regulatory Agencies which affect the District; or 4. A determination by the General Manager that such modification is appropriate to further the objectives of this Ordinance. B. Permittee may request a modification to the terms and conditions of an issued permit. The request shall be in writing stating the requested change, and the reasons for the change. The Districts shall review the request, make a determination on the request, and respond in writing. C. Permittee shall be informed of any changes in the permit limitations, conditions, or requirements at least forty-five (45) days prior to the effective date of change. Any changes or new conditions in the permit shall include a reasonable time schedule for compliance. 304.5 Class III Permit Duration and Renewal Class III permits shall be issued for a period not to exceed three (3) years. Upon expiration of the permit, the user shall apply for renewal of the permit in accordance with the provisions of,this Article 3. 304.6 Class III Permit Charge For Use A. The purpose of a charge for use is to ensure that each recipient of sewerage service from the District pays its reasonably proportionate share of all costs of providing that sewerage service. Charges for use to recover the cost of conveying, treating, and disposing of sewage in District's sewerage facilities are exclusive of any fees levied by local sewering agencies. The charge for use shall be based on the total maintenance, operation, capital expenditures, and reserve requirements for providing wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal. B. A discharger who is issued a Class III wastewater Discharge Permit under the provisions of this ordinance shall pay a charge for use in accordance with the provisions contained herein and the unit charge rates adopted annually by resolution of the Board of Directors. This charge shall be determined as follows: 1. An Operations and Maintenance Service Charge for the total annual operation and maintenance funding requirements of the 35 sewerage system established in the adopted budget shall be allocated to a wastewater flow charge. The operation and maintenance costs as distributed to flow shall be divided by the projected annual flow volume to be treated by the sewerage system in the budgeted year. 2. A Capital Facilities Replacement Service Charge for capital replacement and capital improvements shall be levied at a rate determined by the Board of Directors. 3. The charge rate for the wastewater parameter of flow as determined in (1) and (2) above shall be summed, and the rate so determined will be expressed in dollars per million gallons. 4. The District shall invoice the user on a quarterly basis in accordance with policies and procedures adopted by the General Manager. The quarterly estimated charge for use shall be calculated by multiplying the charge rate as determined in (3) above and the estimated volume of wastewater discharged. Annually, the District shall compute the charge for use based upon actual use for the preceding 12-month period on an annual reconciliation statement. The charge for use is payable within forty-five (45) days of invoicing by the District. A credit will be allowed for the annual ad valorem tax basic levy allocated to the District for the property for which a permit has been issued by the District. A credit will also be allowed for any supplemental user fee adopted by the Board of Directors by separate ordinance. C. Current property tax bills shall be supplied by the permittee to the District by May 31 of each year for use in determining the ad valorem tax credit and/or the supplemental user fee credit. If the tax bills are not supplied, the District will endeavor to obtain the data. Data obtained by the District will be considered correct and will not be adjusted before the next annual reconciliation statement. There shall be a fee levied for District administrative costs when ad valorem property tax and/or supplemental user fee data is obtained by the District. The amount of the fee shall be adopted by the District's Board of Directors. D. So the District may determine actual annual water use, the user shall provide to the District copies of its water bills. If these water bill copies are not received by July 31 of each year for the 12-month period ended closest to June 30, the District will endeavor to obtain the water use data. Data obtained by the District will be considered correct and will not be adjusted before the next annual reconciliation statement. There shall be a fee levied for District administrative costs when water use data is obtained by the District. The amount of the fee shall be adopted by the District's Board of Directors. 305. SPECIAL PURPOSE DISCHARGE PERMITS A. No user requiring a Special Purpose Discharge Permit shall discharge wastewater without obtaining a Special Purpose Discharge Permit. B. Special Purpose Discharge Permits shall be expressly subject to all provisions of this Ordinance and all other regulations, charges for use, and fees established by the District. The conditions of Wastewater Discharge Permits shall be enforced by the District in accordance with this Ordinance and applicable State and Federal Regulations. 36 C. All -Special Purpose Discharge Permit users proposing to discharge directly or indirectly into the Districts' sewerage facilities shall obtain a Wastewater Discharge Permit by filing an application pursuant to Section 305.1 and paying the applicable fees pursuant to Section 305.3. This discharge permit may be granted when no alternative method of disposal is reasonably available, or to mitigate an environmental risk or health hazard. 305.1 Special Purpose Discharge Permit Application A. Applicants seeking a special purpose wastewater permit shall complete and file with the District, prior to commencing discharge, an application in the form prescribed by the District. This application shall be accompanied by the applicable fees, plumbing plans, a detailed analysis of the alternatives for water disposal, or other data as needed by the District for review. B. The permit application may be denied when the applicant has failed to establish to the Districts' satisfaction that adequate pretreatment equipment is included within the applicants' plans to ensure that the discharge limits will be met or that the applicant has, in the past, demonstrated an inability to comply with applicable discharge limits. 305.2 Special Purpose Discharge Permit Conditions and Limits A. Discharge conditions and limits shall be no less stringent than Section 205, Limits on Radioactive Wastes; Section 209, Limits on Wastewater Strength and Characteristics; Section 210, Mass Emisbion Rate Determination, and Table I, Local Discharge Limits. B. Monitoring requirements for the discharge shall be for those non -compatible pollutants known to exist in the discharge. At least one analysis prior to sewer discharge shall be performed for all constituents contained in the most current Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) "Priority Pollutant" list, excluding asbestos. C. The District may specify and make part of each Special Purpose Discharge Permit specific pretreatment requirements or other terms and conditions determined by the General Manager to be appropriate to protect the District's Sewerage Facility, the Local Sewering Agency, to comply with Regulatory Agencies' requirements, to ensure compliance with this Ordinance, and to assess user charges. 305.3 Special Purpose Discharge Permit Fee The special purpose discharge permit fee shall be paid by the applicant in an amount adopted by resolution of the Board of Directors. Payment of permit fees must be received by the District prior to issuance of either a new permit or a renewed permit. Each permittee shall also pay delinquent invoices in full prior to permit renewal. 305.4 Special Purpose Discharge Permit Modification of Terms and Conditions A. The terms and conditions of an issued permit may be subject to modification and change in the sole determination by the District during the life of the permit based on: 1. The discharger's current or anticipated operating data; 2. The District's current or anticipated operating data; 37 3. • Changes in the requirements of Regulatory Agencies which affect the District; or 4. A determination by the General Manager that such modification is appropriate to further the objectives of this Ordinance. B. A permittee may request a modification to the terms and conditions of an issued permit. The request shall be in writing stating the requested change, and the reasons for the change. The District shall review the request, make a determination on the request, and respond in writing. C. A permittee shall be informed of any changes in the permit at least forty-five (45) days prior to the effective date of change. Any changes or new conditions in the permit shall include a reasonable time schedule for compliance. 305.5 Special Purpose Discharge Permit Duration and Renewal Special purpose discharge permits shall be issued for a period not to exceed one (1) year, but may be renewed as determined by the General Manager. Users seeking permit renewal shall comply with all provisions of this Article 3. 305.6 Special Purpose Discharge Permit Charge for Use A charge for use to cover all costs of the District for providing sewerage service and monitoring shall be established by the General Manager. A deposit determined by the General Manager to be sufficient to pay the estimated charges for use shall accompany the Special Purpose Discharge Permit application, and said deposit shall be applied to the charges for use. 306. WASTEHAULER DISCHARGE PERMIT A. Wastehauler Discharge Permits shall be expressly subject to all provisions of this Ordinance and all other regulations, charges for use, and fees established by the District. The conditions of wastehauler discharge permits shall be enforced by the District in accordance with this Ordinance and applicable State and Federal Regulations. B. A wastehauler proposing to discharge waste into the District disposal station shall obtain both a valid Orange County Health Department Permit (where applicable), and a CSDOC Wastehauler Permit. 38 306.1 Wastehauler Discharge Permit Application A. No wastehauler shall discharge wastewater without a Wastehauler Discharge Permit. B. Any person required to obtain a Wastehauler Discharge Permit shall complete and file with the District prior to commencing discharge, an application in a form prescribed by the District. This application shall be accompanied by the applicable fees. The applicant shall submit, in units and terms appropriate for evaluation, the following information: 1. Name, address, telephone number, and description of the industries, or clients using the applicant's services. 2. (Whichever is applicable) Name, address of any and all principals/owners/major shareholders of the company; Articles of Incorporation; most recent Report of the Secretary of State; Business License. 3. Name and address of leaseholder of the vehicle or trailer, if applicable. 4. Number of trucks and trailers and the license numbers and tank hauling capacity of each. 5. A copy of the applicant's Orange County Health Department Permit. C. Other information related to the applicant's business operations and potential discharge may be requested to properly evaluate the permit application. D. After evaluation of the data furnished, the District may issue a wastehauler discharge permit, subject to terms and conditions set forth in this Ordinance and as otherwise determined by the General Manager to be appropriate to protect the District's system. 306.2 Wastehauler Discharge Permit Conditions and Limits The issuance of a wastehauler permit may contain any of the following conditions or limits: A. Limits on discharge of heavy metals and other priority pollutants. B. Requirements for maintaining and submitting wastehauling records and waste manifests. C. Additional requirements as otherwise determined to be appropriate by the General Manager to protect the District's system or as specified by other Regulatory Agencies. D. Other terms and conditions which may be applicable to ensure compliance with this Ordinance. 306.3 Wastehauler Discharge Permit Fee The wastehauler discharge permit fee shall be paid by the applicant in an amount adopted by resolution of the Boards of Directors. Payment of permit fees must be received by the District prior to issuance of either a new permit or a renewed permit. A permittee shall also pay any delinquent invoices in full prior to permit renewal. 39 306.4 Wastehauler Identification Decal and Access Card Transfer A. The identification decal is non -transferable. B. The gate access card is issued to a specific permitted vehicle and is non -transferable unless previously authorized in writing by the District. 306.5 Wastehauler Discharge Permit Modification of Terms and Conditions A. The terms and conditions of an issued permit may be subject to modification and change in the sole determination by the District during the life of the permit based on: 1. The discharger's current or anticipated operating data; 2. The District's current or anticipated operating data; 3. Changes in the requirements of Regulatory Agencies which affect the District; or 4. A determination by the General Manager that such modification is appropriate to further the objectives of this Ordinance. B. Permittee may request a modification to the terms and conditions of an issued permit. The request shall be in writing stating the requested change, and the reasons for the change. The District shall review the request, make a determination on the request, and respond in writing. C. Permittee shall be informed of any change in the permit limits, conditions, or requirements at least forty-five (45) days prior to the effective date of change. Any changes or new conditions in the permit shall include a reasonable time schedule for compliance. 306.6 Wastehauler Discharge Permit Duration and Renewal Wastehauler discharge permits shall be issued for a period not to exceed one (1) year. Upon expiration of the permit, the user shall apply for renewal of the permit in accordance with the provisions of Article 3. 306.7 Wastehauler Discharge Permit Charge for Use A charge for use to cover all costs of the District for providing the disposal station service and monitoring shall be established by resolution of the Board of Directors. 307. TRANSPORTABLE TREATMENT UNIT (TTU) DISCHARGE PERMIT Any person intending to operate a TTU shall obtain a TTU Discharge Permit prior to discharge into the Districts' sewerage system. TTU discharge permits shall be expressly subject to all provisions of this Ordinance and all other regulations, and fees established by the District. The conditions of TTU discharge permits shall be enforced by the District in accordance with this Ordinance and applicable State and Federal Regulations. 307.1 TTU Discharge Permit Application A. Any person required to obtain a TTU Wastewater Discharge Permit shall complete and file with the District prior to commencing discharge, an application in a form prescribed by the District. 40 307.2 This application shall be accompanied by the applicable fees. The applicant shall submit, in units and terms appropriate for evaluation, the following information: 1. Namej address, description of the service activity, copy of the permit to operate issued by the State of California, Department of Health Services. 2. (Whichever is applicable) name, address of any and all principals/owners/major shareholders of company; Articles of Incorporation; most recent Report of the Secretary of State; Business License. 3. Volume of wastewater that can be processed by the applicant. 4. Name of individual, other than officers of corporation, who can be served with notices. 5. Department of Motor Vehicles license plate number(s). 6. EPA and State Identification Number. B. Applicants may be required to submit mechanical and plumbing plans, and details to show all spill containment, clarifiers and appurtenances by size, location, and elevation for evaluation. C. Applicants may be required to submit other information related to the applicant's business operations and potential discharge may be requested to properly evaluate the permit application. D. After evaluation of the data furnished, the District may issue a wastehauler discharge permit, subject to terms and conditions set forth in this Ordinance and as otherwise determined by the General Manager to be appropriate to protect the District's system. E. The permit application may be denied if the applicant fails to establish to the Districts' satisfaction that adequate pretreatment equipment is included within the applicants' plans to ensure that the discharge limits will be met or if the applicant has, in the. past, demonstrated an inability to comply with applicable discharge limits. TTU Discharge Permit Conditions and Limits The issuance of a TTU permit may contain any of the following conditions or limits: A. Mass emission rates or concentrations regulating heavy metals and other priority pollutants. B. Limits on rate and time of discharge or requirements for flow regulation and equalization. C. Requirements to notify the District in writing 72 hours prior to the discharge of any waste to the sewer. D. Requirements for the user to construct and maintain, at his own expense, pH control, flow monitoring, or sampling facilities. E. Requirements for submission of technical reports, discharge reports, wastehauling records, and waste manifests. F. Requirements to self -monitor. 41 G. Requirements for maintaining plant records relating to wastewater discharge and waste manifests as specified by District. H. Other terms and conditions which may be applicable to ensure compliance with this Ordinance. I. Other terms and conditions determined by the General Manager to be appropriate to protect the District's system. 307.3 TTU Discharge Permit Fee A. The TTU permit fee shall be in an amount adopted by resolution of the Board of Directors. The permit fee shall be payable within forty-five (45) days of invoicing by the District. Payment of permit fees must be received by the District prior to issuance of either a new permit or a renewed permit. Permittee shall also pay any delinquent invoices in full prior to permit renewal. B. Any permit issued may be conditioned upon depositing financial security to guarantee payment of all annual fees and charges to be incurred, in accordance with the provisions of Section 623.(E)*** of this Ordinance. 307.4 TTU Discharge Permit Modifications of Terms and Conditions A. The terms and conditions of an issued permit may be subject to modification and change in the sole determination by the General Manager during the life of the permit based on: 1. The discharger's current or anticipated operating data; 2. The District's current or anticipated operating data; 3. Changes in the requirements of Regulatory Agencies which affect the District; or 4. A determination by the General Manager that such modification is appropriate to further the objectives of this Ordinance. B. The permittee shall request a modification to the terms and conditions of an issued permit prior to increasing the contribution of flow, pollutants, or changing the nature of pollutants where such contribution or change will cause the permittee to be in violation of their permit or this Ordinance. The request shall be in writing stating the requested change, and the reasons for the change. The District shall review the request, make a determination on the request, and respond in writing. The Districts' approval may be granted or denied. C. Permittee shall be informed of any change in the permit limits, conditions, or requirements at least forty-five (45) days prior to the effective date of change. Any changes or new conditions in the permit shall include a reasonable time schedule for compliance. 307.5 TTU Discharge Permit Duration and Renewal TTU permits shall be issued for a period not to exceed one (1) year. 308. LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY EXEMPTION FROM CHARGES A. No sewer use charges, as specified in Sections 302.6, 303.6, and 304.6 herein, shall be payable for the discharge of wastewater from property within the District territorial boundaries owned or leased by local public agencies, provided, that such property is not used for proprietary purposes. If the District determines the local public agency is placing a significant demand on the District's sewerage system, it may rescind the exemption provided for herein 42 and assess a charge in an amount related to the cost to the District of providing the service. B. Local agencies, for purposes of this Section, shall include cities, the county, special districts and school districts, but shall not include the United States Government or the State of California or any agencies thereof. C. This exemption applies only in those Districts which do not have an Annual .Supplemental Sanitary Sewer Use Charge established in accordance with Section 703. 309. EXCESS CAPACITY CHARGE New developments or existing developments that expand operations that require substantial sewerage facilities capacity may be subject to an excess capacity facilities charge in an amount and method to be determined by the Board of Directors on a case -by -case basis. 310. OUT OF DISTRICT PERMITS MISCHARGERS A. Industrial wastewater Discharge Permits for dischargers located outside of the District's service area but tributary to the District's sewerage facilities, may be issued by a local sewering agency after approval by the District. The District shall have 'the right of inspection and sampling of the user's discharge to determine compliance with industrial waste discharge regulations. Such inspection and sampling will be performed under a coordinated plan developed with the local agency. The more stringent of the industrial waste discharge regulations and effluent limits of the District and the local agency shall apply to the discharger. B. Pursuant to Article 6 herein, the District shall have the right to enforce the Federal Pretreatment Regulations, the provisions of this Ordinance, and permit conditions and limits applicable to any person located outside of the District's service area, but whose discharge is tributary to the District's sewerage facilities. C. The fees for use shall be determined by the District and set forth in a use agreement with the local sewering agency. 43 ARTICLE 4 FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS 401. DRAWING SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Upon request by the District: A. Applicants or users may be required to submit three copies of detailed facility plans. The submittal shall be in a form and content acceptable to the District for review of existing or proposed pretreatment facilities, spill containment facilities, monitoring facilities, metering facilities, and operating procedures. The review of the plans and procedures shall in no way relieve the user of the responsibility of modifying the facilities or procedures in the future, as necessary to produce an acceptable discharge, and to meet the requirements of this Ordinance or any requirements of other Regulatory Agencies. B. The drawing shall depict as a minimum the manufacturing process (waste generating sources), spill containment, monitoring or metering facilities, and pretreatment facilities. C. The applicant or user shall submit a schematic drawing of the pretreatment facilities, piping and instrumentation diagram, and wastewater characterization report. D. Users and applicants may also be required to submit for review site plans, floor plans, mechanical and plumbing plans, and details to show all sewers, spill containment, clarifiers, and appurtenances by size, location, and elevation for evaluation. E. The District may require the drawings be prepared by a California Registered Chemical, Mechanical, or Civil Engineer. 402. PRETREATMENT FACILITIES A. All users shall provide wastewater acceptable to the District, under the limits established herein before discharging to any public sewer. Any facilities required to pretreat or transport wastewater shall be provided and maintained by a qualified operator and in proper operating condition at the user's expense. B. All users may also be required by the District to submit waste analysis plans, contingency plans, and meet other necessary requirements to ensure proper operation of the- pretreatment facilities and compliance with permit limits and this Ordinance. C. No user shall increase the use of water or in any other manner attempt to dilute a discharge as a partial or complete substitute for treatment to achieve compliance with this Ordinance and the user's Permit. 403. SPILL CONTAINMENT FACILITIES/ACCIDENTAL SLUG CONTROL PLANS A. All users shall provide spill containment for protection against discharge of prohibited materials or other wastes regulated by this Ordinance. Such protection shall be designed to secure the discharges and to prevent them from entering into the system in accordance with reasonable engineering standards. Such facilities shall be provided and maintained at the user's expense. 44 B. The General Manager may require any industrial user to develop and implement an accidental discharge/slug control plan. At least once every two years the District shall evaluate whether each significant industrial user needs such a plan. Any user required to develop and implement an accidental discharge/control slug plan shall submit a plan which addresses, at a minimum, the following: 1. Description of discharge practices, including non -routine batch discharges. 2. Description of stored chemicals. 3. Procedures for immediately notifying . the POTW of any accidental of slug discharge. Such notification must also be given for any discharge which would violate any of the prohibited discharges in Article 2 of this Ordinance. 4. Procedures to prevent adverse impact from any accidental or slug discharge. Such procedures include, but are not limited to, inspection and maintenance of storage'areas, handling and transfer of materials, loading and unloading operations, control of plant site run-off, worker training, building of containment structures or equipment, measures for containing toxic organic pollutants (including solvents), and measures and equipment for emergency response. 404. MONITORING/METERING FACILITIES A. The District may require the user to construct and maintain in proper operating condition at the user's sole expense, flow monitoring, constituent monitoring and/or sampling facilities. B. The monitoring or metering facilities may be required to include a security closure that can be locked with a District provided hasp lock during sampling or upon termination of service. C. The location of the monitoring or metering facilities shall be subject to approval by the District. D. The user shall provide immediate, clear, safe and uninterrupted access to the District to the user's monitoring and metering facilities. 405. WASTE MINIMIZATION REQUIREMENTS The user shall provide waste minimization plans to conserve water, investigate product substitution, provide inventory control, implement employee education, and other steps as necessary to minimize waste produced. 45 ARTICLE 5 MONITORING, REPORTING, NOTIFICATION, AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS 501. MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS A. Monitorina for Annual Charge for Use The wastewater constituents and characteristics of a 'discharger needed for determining the annual charge for use shall be submitted in the form of self -monitoring reports by the user to the District, if requested. The frequency of analyses and reporting shall be set forth in the user's permit. The analyses of these constituents and characteristics shall be by a laboratory acceptable to the District, and at the sole expense of the permittee. Analyses performed by District's personnel may used in the determination of the annual charge for use. B. Monitoring for Compliance with Permit Conditions or Reporting Requirements The District may require reports for self -monitoring of wastewater constituents and characteristics of the discharger needed for determining compliance with any limit or requirements as specified in the user's permit, Federal or State Regulations, or this ordinance. These reports include: (1) Baseline Monitoring Reports. (2) Compliance Schedule Progress Reports. (3) 90-Day Compliance Reports. (4) Periodic Reports on -continued compliance. (5) Notification of the Discharge of Hazardous Waste. (6) Other reports as required by the District. Monitoring reports of the analyses of wastewater constituents and characteristics shall be in a manner and form approved by the District and shall be submitted upon request of the District. When applicable, the self -monitoring requirement and frequency of reporting may be set forth in the user's permit as directed by the District. The analyses of wastewater constituents and characteristics and the preparation of the monitoring report shall be done at the sole expense of the user. Failure by the user to perform any required monitoring, or to submit monitoring reports required by the District constitutes a violation of this Ordinance, may result in determining whether the permittee is in significant non-compliance, and be cause for the District to initiate all necessary tasks and analyses to determine the wastewater constituents and characteristics for compliance with any limits and requirements specified in the user's permit or in this Ordinance. The user shall be responsible for any and all expenses of the District in undertaking such monitoring analyses and preparation of reports. 46 501.1 Inspection and Sampling Conditions A. The District may inspect and sample the wastewater generating and disposal facilities of any user to ascertain whether the intent of this Ordinance is being met and the user is complying with all requirements. B. The District shall have the right to place on the user's property or other locations as determined by the District, such devices as are necessary to conduct sampling or metering operations. Where a user has security measures in force, the user shall make necessary arrangements so that personnel from the District shall be permitted to enter without delay for the purpose of performing their specific responsibilities.. C. In order for the District to determine the wastewater characteristics of the discharger for purposes of determining the annual use charge and for compliance with permit requirements, the user shall make available for inspection and copying by the District all notices, self -monitoring reports, waste manifests, and records including, but not limited to, those related to production, wastewater generation, wastewater disposal, and those required in the Federal Pretreatment Requirements without restriction but subject to the confidentiality provision set forth in Section 103 herein. All such records shall be kept by the user a minimum of three (3) years. 501.2 Right of Entry Persons or occupants of premises where wastewater is created or discharged -shall allow the District, or its representatives, reasonable access to all parts of the wastewater generating and disposal facilities for the purposes of inspection and sampling during all times the discharger's facility is open, operating, or any other reasonable time. No person shall interfere with, delay, resist or refuse entrance to authorized District's personnel attempting to inspect any facility involved directly or indirectly with a discharge of wastewater to the District's sewerage system. 501.3 Notification of Spill or Slug Loading A. In the event the discharger is unable to comply with any permit condition due to a�breakdown of equipment, accidents, or human error, or the discharger has reasonable opportunity to know that his discharge will exceed the discharge provisions of the user's permit, Section 209 or Table I, Local Discharge Limits, the discharger shall immediately notify the District by telephone. If the material discharged to the sewer has the potential to .cause or result in a fire or explosion hazard, the discharger shall immediately notify the local fire department and the District. B. Confirmation of this notification shall be made in writing no later than five (5) working days from the date of the incident. The written notification shall state the date of the incident, the reasons for the discharge or spill, what steps were taken to immediately correct the problem, and what steps are being taken to prevent the problem from recurring. C. Such notification shall not relieve the user of any expense, loss, damage or other liability which may be incurred as a result of damage or loss to the District or any other damage or loss to person or property; nor shall such notification relieve the user of any fees or other liability which may be imposed by this Ordinance or other applicable law. 47 501.4 Notification of Bypass A. Bypass of industrial wastewater to the sewerage system is prohibited. The District may take enforcement action against the user, unless: 1. Bypass was unavoidable because it was done to prevent loss of life, personal injury, or severe property damage; 2. There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass, such as the use of auxiliary treatment facilities, retention of untreated wastes, elective slow -down or shut -down of production units or maintenance during periods of production downtime. This condition is not satisfied if adequate backup equipment could have been feasibly installed in the exercise of 'reasonable engineering judgment to prevent a bypass which occurred during normal periods of equipment downtime or preventative maintenance; and 3. The permittee submitted notices as required under Article 501.4(B). B. If a permittee knows in advance of the need for a bypass, it shall submit a written request to allow the bypass to the District, if possible, at least ten (10) days before the date of the bypass. C. The District may approve an anticipated bypass at its sole discretion after considering its adverse effects, and the District determines that the conditions listed in 501.4(A)(1-3) are met. D. A permittee shall provide telephone notification to the District of an unanticipated bypass that exceeds its permitted discharge limits within four hours from the time the permittee becomes aware of the bypass. A written report shall also be provided within five (5) days of the time the permittee becomes aware or could reasonably have been aware of the bypass. The report shall contain a description of the bypass and its cause; the duration of the bypass, including exact dates and times, and, if the bypass has not been corrected, the anticipated time it is expected to continue; and steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent recurrence of the bypass. Failure to submit oral notice or written report may be grounds for permit revocation. 48 ARTICLE 6 ENFORCEMENT 600. PURPOSE AND SCOPE A. The Board finds that in order for the District to comply with the laws, regulations, and rules imposed upon it by Regulatory Agencies and to ensure that the District's sewerage facilities and treatment processes are protected and are able to operate with the highest degree of efficiency, and to protect the public health and environment, specific enforcement provisions must be adopted to govern the discharges to the District's system by industrial discharge permittees. B. To ensure that all interested parties are afforded due process of law and that non-compliance and violations are resolved as soon as possible, the general policy of the District is that: 1. Any determination relating to a Probation Order, Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreement (ECSA), or Regulatory Compliance Schedule Agreement (RCSA) will be made by the Division Head of the Source Control Division, with a right of appeal by the permittee to the General Manager pursuant to' the procedures set forth in Section 617. 2. A user, permittee, or applicant for a permit may request the Executive Committee to hear an appeal of the General Manager's decision pursuant to Section 618. Such request may be granted or denied by the Executive Committee. 3. Any permit suspension or revocation recommended by the Source Control Division Head will be heard and a recommendation made to the General Manager by a District Department Head or other person designated by the General Manager with a right of appeal of the General Manager's order by the permittee to the Executive Committee pursuant to the provisions of Section 618. 4. Actions and decisions by the Division Head or Department Head are made pursuant to a delegation of authority by the General Manager as authorized by Section 107 of this Ordinance. C. The District, at its discretion, may utilize any one, combination, or all enforcement remedies provided in Article 6 in response to any permit or Ordinance violation. 49 601. DETERMINATION OF NON—COMPLIANCE WITH DISCHARGE LIMITS A. Sampling Procedures 1. Sampling of all permittees shall be conducted in the time, place, manner, and frequency determined at the sole discretion of the District. 2. Non-compliance with mass emission rate limits, concentration limits, permit discharge conditions, or any discharge provision of this Ordinance may be determined by an analysis of a grab or composite sample of the effluent of a user. Non- compliance with mass emission rate limits shall be determined by an analysis of a composite sample of the user's effluent, except that a grab sample may be used to determine compliance with mass emission rate limits when the discharge is from a closed (batch) treatment system in which there is no wastewater flow into the system when the discharge is occurring, the volume of wastewater contained in the batch system is known, the time interval of discharge is known, and the grab sample is homogeneous and representative of the discharge. 3. Any sample taken from a sample point is considered to be representative of the discharge to the public sewer. 602. ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES AND APPLICABLE FEES A. Self -Monitoring Requirements as a Result of Non -Compliance 1. If analysis of any sample obtained by the District or by a permittee shows non-compliance with the applicable wastewater discharge limits set forth in the Ordinance or in the permittee's discharge permit, the District may impose self - monitoring requirements on the permittee. 2. A permittee shall perform required self -monitoring of constituents in a frequency, at the specific location, and in a manner directed by the District. 3. All analyses of self -monitoring samples shall be performed by an independent laboratory acceptable to the District and submitted to the District in a form and frequency determined by the District. 4. All self -monitoring costs shall be borne by the permittee. 5. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to limit the authority of the District to impose self -monitoring as .a permit condition. B. Purpose of Non -Compliance Sampling Fees The purpose of the non-compliance sampling fee is to compensate the District for costs of additional sampling, monitoring, laboratory analysis, treatment, disposal, and administrative processing incurred as a result of the non- compliance, and .shall be in addition to and not in lieu of any penalties as may be assessed pursuant to Sections 615 and 616. 50 C. Non -Compliance Sampling Fees for Composite Samples 1. Each.violation of a permittee's permit limit or condition is a violation of this Ordinance. 2. a) If analysis of any composite sample of a permittee's discharge obtained by the District shows a major violation by the permittee of the mass emission rates or concentration limits specified in the permittee's discharge permit or in this Ordinance, then the permittee shall pay non-compliance sampling fees to the District pursuant to fee schedules adopted by the District's Board of Directors. b) If analysis of any composite sample of a permittee's discharge obtained by the District shows a minor violation by the permittee of the mass emission rates or concentration limits specified in the permittee's discharge permit or in this Ordinance, then the District may impose non-compliance sampling fees pursuant to fee schedules adopted by the District's Board of Directors. 3. The fees specified in subsection 602.C.2.(a), C.2.(b) and D herein shall be imposed for each date on which the District conducts sampling as a result of a violation by a permittee. D. Non -Compliance Sampling Fees for Grab Samples and Self -Monitoring Results 1. If analysis of any grab sample analysis of a permittee's discharge shows non-compliance with any concentration limits as set forth in the user's permit or in this Ordinance, the District may impose non-compliance sampling fees, pursuant to fee schedules adopted by the District's Board of Directors, for sampling conducted by the District as a result of a violation by the permittee. 2. If any self -monitoring analysis of a permittee's discharge shows non-compliance with any concentration limits or mass emission rates as set forth in the user's permit or in this Ordinance, the District may impose non-compliance sampling fees, pursuant to fee schedules adopted by the District's Board of Directors, for sampling conducted by the District as a result of a violation by the permittee. 602.1 Probation Order A. Grounds In the event the Division Head determines that a permittee has violated any provision of this Ordinance, or the terms, conditions and limits of its discharge permit, or has not made payment of all amounts owed to the District for user charges, non-compliance fees or any other fees, the General Manager may issue a Probation Order, whereby the permittee must comply with all directives, conditions and requirements therein within the time prescribed. 51 B. Provisions The issuance of a Probation Order may contain terms and conditions including, but not limited to, installation of pretreatment equipment and facilities, requirements for self -monitoring, submittal of drawings or technical reports, operator certification, audit of waste minimization practices, payment of fees, limits on rate and time of discharge, or other provisions to ensure compliance with this Ordinance. C. Probation Order - Expiration A Probation Order issued by the General Manager shall be in effect for a period not to exceed ninety (90) days. 602.2 Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreement (ECSA) A. Grounds Upon determination that a permittee is in non-compliance with the terms, conditions or limits specified in its permit or any provision of this Ordinance, and needs to construct and/or acquire and install equipment related to pretreatment, the General Manager may require the permittee to enter into an ECSA which will, upon the effective date of the ECSA, amend the permittee's permit. The ECSA shall contain terms and conditions by which a permittee must operate during its term and shall provide specific dates for achieving compliance with each term and condition for construction and/or acquisition and installation of required equipment related to pretreatment. B. Provisions The issuance of an ECSA may contain terms and conditions including but not limited to requirements for self -monitoring, installation of pretreatment equipment and facilities, submittal of drawings or reports, operator certification, audit of waste minimization practices, payment of fees, limits on rate and time of discharge, deposit of performance guarantee, or other provisions to ensure compliance with this Ordinance. C. ECSA - Payment of Amounts Owed The District shall not enter into an ECSA until such time as all amounts owed to the District, including user fees, non-compliance sampling fees, deposits, or other amounts due are paid in full, or an agreement for deferred payment secured by collateral or a third party, is approved by the General Manager. Failure to pay all amounts owed to the District shall be grounds for permit suspension or permit revocation as set forth in Section 604 and 605. D. ECSA - Permit Suspension/Revocation If compliance is not achieved in accordance with the terms and conditions of an ECSA during its term, the General Manager may issue an order suspending or revoking the discharge permit pursuant to Section 604 or 605 of this Ordinance. 52 603. REGULATORY COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE AGREEMENT (RCSA) A. Grounds If at any time subsequent to the issuance of a Wastewater Discharge Permit to an industrial user, Federal Categorical Pretreatment Standards are adopted or revised by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, or in the event the District enacts revised discharge limits, the General Manager, upon determination that an industrial user would not be in compliance with the adopted or revised limits, may require the industrial user to enter into a RCSA with the District under terms and conditions that would provide for achieving compliance with all new standards by the industrial user on a specific date. The RCSA shall have a maximum term of two hundred -seventy (270) days. B. Provisions The issuance of a RCSA may contain terms and conditions including but not limited to requirements for installation of pretreatment equipment and facilities, submittal of drawings or reports, waste minimization practices or other provisions to ensure compliance with this Ordinance. C. RCSA - Non -Compliance Sampling Fee During the period said RCSA is in effect, any discharge by permittee in violation of the RCSA will require payment of non-compliance sampling fees in accordance with Article 6. 604. PERMIT SUSPENSION A. Grounds The General Manager may suspend any permit when it is determined that a permittee: 1. Fails to comply with the terms and conditions of either an. ECSA or RCSA. 2. Knowingly provides a false statement, representation, record, report, or other document to the District. 3. Refuses to provide records, reports, plans, or other documents required by the District to determine permit terms, conditions, or limits, discharge compliance, or compliance with this Ordinance. 4. Falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any monitoring device or sample collection method. S. Fails to report significant changes in operations or wastewater constituents and characteristics. 6. Violates a Probation Order. 7. Refuses reasonable access to the permittee's premises for the purpose of inspection and monitoring. S. Does not make timely payment of all amounts owed to the District for user charges, non-compliance sampling fees, permit fees, or any other fees imposed pursuant to this Ordinance. 53 9. Violates any condition or limit of its discharge permit or any provision of the District's Ordinance. B. Notice/Hearing When the General Manager has reason to believe that grounds exist for permit suspension, he shall give written notice thereof by certified mail to the permittee setting forth a statement of the facts and grounds deemed to exist, together with the time and place where the charges shall be heard by the General Manager's designee. The hearing date shall be not less than fifteen (15) calendar days nor more than forty-five (45) calendar days after the mailing of such notice. 1. At the suspension hearing, the permittee shall have an opportunity to respond to the allegations set forth in the notice by presenting written or oral evidence. The hearing shall be conducted in accordance with procedures established by the General Manager and approved by the District's General Counsel. 2. After the conclusion of the hearing, the General Manager's designee shall submit a written report to the General Manager setting forth a brief statement of facts found to be true, a determination of the issues presented, conclusions, and a recommendation. Upon receipt of the written report, the General Manager shall make his determination and should he find that grounds exist for suspension of the permit, he shall issue his decision and order in writing within thirty (30) calendar days after the conclusion of the hearing by his designee. The written decision and order of the General Manager shall be sent by certified mail to the permittee or its legal counsel/representative at the permittee's business address. C. Effect 1. Upon an order of suspension by the General Manager becoming final, the permittee shall immediately cease and desist its discharge and shall have no right to discharge any industrial wastewater, directly or indirectly to the District's system for the duration of the suspension. All costs for physically terminating and reinstating service shall be paid by the permittee. 2. Any owner or responsible management employee of the permittee shall be bound by the order of suspension. 3. An order of permit suspension issued by the General Manager shall be final in all respects on the sixteenth (16th) day after it is mailed to the permittee unless a request for hearing is filed with the Executive Committee pursuant to Section 618 no later than 5:00 p.m. on the fifteenth (15th) day following such mailing. 54 605. PERMIT REVOCATION A. Grounds The General Manager may revoke any permit when it is determined that a permittee: 1. Knowingly provides a false statement, representation, record, report, or other document to the District. 2. Refuses to provide records, reports, plans, or other documents required by the District to determine permit terms, conditions, or limits, discharge compliance, or compliance with this Ordinance. ' 3. Falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any monitoring device or sample collection method. 4. Fails to report significant changes in operations or wastewater constituents and characteristics. 5. Fails to comply with the terms and conditions of an ECSA, permit suspension, or probation order. 6. Discharges effluent to the District's sewerage system while its permit is suspended. 7. Refuses reasonable access to the permittee's premises for the purpose of inspection and monitoring. B. Does not make timely payment of all amounts owed to the District for user charges, non-compliance sampling fees, permit fees, or any other fees imposed pursuant to this Ordinance. 9. Causes interference with the Districts' collection, treatment, or disposal system. 10. Fails to submit oral notice or written report of bypass occurrence. 11. Violates any condition or limit of its discharge permit or any provision of the District's Ordinance. B. Notice/Hearing When the General Manager has reason to believe that grounds exist for the revocation of a permit, he shall give written notice by certified mail thereof to the permittee setting forth a statement of the facts and grounds deemed to exist together with the time and place where the charges shall be heard by the General Manager's designee., The hearing date shall be not less than fifteen (15) calendar days nor more than forty-five (45) calendar days after the mailing of such notice. 1. At the hearing, the permittee shall have an opportunity to respond to the allegations set forth in the notice by presenting written or oral evidence.. The revocation hearing shall be conducted in accordance with the procedures established by the General Manager and approved by the District's General Counsel. 55 2. After the conclusion of the hearing, the General Manager's designee shall submit a written report to the General Manager setting forth a brief statement of facts found to be,true, a determination of the issues presented, conclusions, and a recommendation. Upon receipt of the written report, the General Manager shall make his determination and should he find that grounds exist for permanent revocation of the permit, he shall issue his decision and order in writing within thirty (30) calendar days after the conclusion of the hearing by his designee. The written decision and order of the General Manager shall be sent by certified mail to the permittee or its legal counsel/representative at the permittee's business address. In the event the General Manager determines to not revoke the permit, he may order other enforcement actions, including,'but not limited to, a temporary suspension of the permit, under terms and conditions that he deems appropriate. C. Effect 1. Upon an order of revocation by the General Manager becoming final, the permittee shall permanently lose all rights to discharge any industrial wastewater directly or indirectly to the District's system. All costs for physical termination shall be paid by the permittee. 2. Any owner or responsible management employee of the permittee shall be bound by the order of revocation. 3. Any future application for a permit at any location within the District by any person subject to an order of revocation will be considered by the District after fully reviewing the records of the revoked permit, which records may be the basis for denial of a new permit. 4. An order of permit revocation issued by the General Manager shall be final in all respects on the sixteenth (16th) day after it is mailed to the permittee unless a request for hearing is filed with the Executive Committee pursuant to Section 618 no later than 5:00 p.m. on the fifteenth (15th) day following such mailing. 606. WASTEHAULER NON-COMPLIANCE WITH PERMIT CONDITIONS A wastehauler's non-compliance with permit requirements shall be determined by an analysis of a sample of the discharge for any constituent or conditions specified in the wastehauler's discharge permit or this Ordinance. If the discharge of a wastehauler is found by the analysis to be in excess of the concentration limits specified in the wastehauler's discharge permit or in this Ordinance, the wastehauler shall, after receiving a demand from the District, identify in writing, all sources of the discharge. Even if it is established to the satisfaction of the General Manager that the origin of the discharge. is septic waste or sanitary waste, the District may still elect not to accept waste from that particular source. 56 If the discharge is from an industrial source(s) and exceeds permit concentration limits or limits specified in this Ordinance, the following shall apply: A. First Violation 1. The permittee shall pay a non-compliance sampling fee. 2. The wastehauler permit for disposal privileges shall be suspended for five (5) days. B. Second Violation 1. The permittee shall pay a non-compliance sampling fee. 2. The wastehauler permit for disposal privileges shall be suspended for ten (10) days. 3. The wastehauler permit may be revoked in accordance with Section 606. 607. DAMAGE TO FACILITIES OR INTERRUPTION OF NORMAL OPERATIONS A. Any person who discharges any waste which causes or contributes to any obstruction, interference, damage, or any other impairment to the District's sewerage facilities or to the operation of those facilities shall be liable for all costs required to clean or repair the facilities together with expenses incurred by the Districts to resume normal operations. Such discharge shall be grounds for permit revocation. A service charge of twenty-five percent (25%) of District's costs shall be added to the costs and charges to reimburse the District for miscellaneous overhead, including administrative personnel and record keeping. The total amount shall be payable within forty-five (45) days of invoicing by the District. B. Any person who discharges a waste which causes or contributes to the District violating its discharge requirements established by any Regulatory Agency incurring additional expenses or suffering losses or damage to the facilities, shall be liable for any costs or expenses incurred by the District, including regulatory fines, penalties, and assessments made by other agencies or a court. 608. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PASS THROUGH Any person whose discharge results in a pass through event affecting the District or its sewerage facilities shall be liable for all costs associated with the event, including treatment costs, regulatory fines, penalties, assessments, and other indirect costs. The discharger shall submit to the District plans to prevent future recurrences to the satisfaction of the District. 609. PUBLICATION OF VIOLATION Upon a determination in a permit suspension, permit revocation, or civil penalty proceedings that a user has discharged in violation of its permit or any provision under this Ordinance, the District may require that the user notify the public and/or other users of the Districts' sewerage facilities of such violation, of actions taken to correct such violation, 57 and of any administrative or judicial orders or penalties imposed as a result of such violation. 610. PUBLISHED NOTICES FOR SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE In accordance with Federal Regulations, the District shall annually cause to be published the names of all industrial users in significant non- compliance. Upon a minimum of a thirty (30)-day notification to the user, said publication shall be made in the newspaper of the largest daily circulation published in the District's service area. 611. PUBLIC NUISANCE Discharge of wastewater in any manner in violation of this Ordinance or of any order issued by the General Manager, as authorized by this Ordinance, is hereby declared a public nuisance and shall be corrected or abated as directed by.the General Manager. Any person creating a public nuisance is guilty of a misdemeanor. 612. TERMINATION OF SERVICE A. The District, by order of the General Manager, may physically terminate sewerage service to any property as follows: 1. On a term of any order of emergency suspension or revocation of a permit; or 2. Upon the failure of a person not holding a valid discharge permit to immediately cease discharge, whether direct or indirect, to the District's sewerage facilities. B. All costs for physical termination shall be paid by the user as well as all costs for reinstating service. 613. EMERGENCY SUSPENSION ORDER A. The District may, by order of the General Manager, suspend sewerage service or wastehauler discharge service when the General Manager determines that such suspension is necessary in order to stop an actual or impending discharge which presents or may present an imminent or substantial endangerment to the health and welfare of persons, or to the environment, or may cause interference to the District's sewerage facilities, or may cause the District to violate any State or Federal Law or Regulation. Any discharger notified of and subject to an Emergency Suspension Order shall immediately cease and desist the discharge of all industrial wastewater to the sewerage system. B. As soon as reasonably practicable following the issuance of an Emergency Suspension Order, but in no event more than five (5) days following the issuance of such order, the General Manager shall hold a hearing to provide the user the opportunity to present information in opposition to the issuance of the Emergency Suspension Order. Such a hearing shall not stay the effect of the Emergency Suspension Order. The hearing shall be conducted in accordance with procedures established by the General Manager and approved by the District's General Counsel. The General Manager shall issue a written decision 58 614. and.order within two (2) business days following the hearing, which decision shall be sent by certified mail to the user or its legal counsel/representative at that user's business address. The decision of the General Manager following the hearing shall be final and not appealable. Whenever a discharger of wastewater is in violation of or has the reasonable potential to violate any provision of this Ordinance, permit condition, or any Federal Pretreatment Standard or requirement as set forth in 40 CFR Section 403.8 et seq., fails to submit required reports, or refuses to allow the District entry to inspect or monitor the user's discharge, the District may petition the Superior Court for the issuance of a preliminary or permanent injunction, or both, as may be appropriate to restrain the continued violation or to prevent threatened violations by the discharger. 615. CIVIL PENALTIES A. Authority All users of the District's system and facilities are subject to enforcement actions administratively or judicially by the District, U.S. EPA, State of California Regional Water Quality Control Board, or the County of Orange District Attorney. Said actions may be taken pursuant to the authority and provisions of several laws, including but not limited to: (1) Federal Water Pollution Control Act, commonly known as the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C.A. Section 1251 et seq.); (2) California Porter - Cologne Water Quality Act (California Water Code Section 13000 et seq.); (3) California Hazardous Waste Control Law (California Health & Safety Code Sections 25100 to 25250); (4) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (42 U.S.C.A Section 6901 et seq.); and (5) California Goverment Code, Sections 54739-54740. B. Recovery of Fines or Penalties In the event the District is subject to the payment of fines or penalties pursuant to the legal authority and actions of other regulatory or enforcement agencies based on a violation of law or regulation or its permits, and said violation can be established by District, as caused by the discharge of any user of the District's system which is in violation of any provision of the District's Ordinance or the user's permit, District shall be entitled to recover from the user all costs and expenses, including, but not limited to, the full amount of said fines or penalties to which it has been subjected. C. Ordinance Pursuant to the authority of California Government Code Sections 54739 - 54740, any person who violates any provision of this Ordinance; any permit condition, prohibition or effluent limit; or any suspension or revocation order shall be liable civilly for a sum not to exceed $25,000.00 per violation for each day in which such violation occurs. Pursuant to the authority of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. Section 1251 et seq., any person who violates any provision of this Ordinance, or any permit condition, prohibition, or effluent limit shall be liable civilly for a sum not to exceed $25,000.00 per violation for each day in which such violation occurs. The General Counsel of the District, upon order of the General Manager, shall petition the Superior Court to impose, 59 assess, and recover such penalties, or such other penalties as the District may impose, assess, and recover pursuant to Federal and/or State legislative authorization. D. Administrative Civil Penalties 1. Pursuant to the authority of California Government Code Sections 54740.5 and 54740.6, the District may issue fLn administrative complaint to any person who violates: a) any provision of this Ordinance; b) any permit condition, prohibition, or effluent limit; or c) any suspension or revocation order. 2. The administrative complaint shall be served by personal delivery or certified mail on the person and shall inform the person that a hearing will be conducted, and shall specify a hearing date within sixty (60) days following service. The administrative complaint will allege the act or failure to act that constitutes the violation of the District's requirements, the provisions of law authorizing civil liability to be imposed, and the proposed civil penalty. The matter shall be heard by the General Manager or his designee. The person to whom an administrative complaint has been issued may waive the right to a hearing, in which case a hearing will not be conducted. 3. At the hearing, the person shall have an opportunity to respond to the allegations set forth in the administrative complaint by presenting written or oral evidence. The hearing shall be conducted in accordance with the procedures established by the General Manager and approved by the Districts' General Counsel. 4. After the conclusion of the hearing, the General Manager's designee shall submit a written report to the General Manager setting forth a brief statement of the facts found to be true, a determination of the issues presented, conclusions, and a recommendation. 5. Upon receipt of the written report, the General Manager shall make his determination and should he find that grounds exist for assessment of a civil penalty against the person, he shall issue his decision and order in writing within thirty (30) calendar days after the conclusion of the hearing by his designee. 6. If, after the hearing or appeal, if any, it is found that the person has violated reporting or discharge requirements, the General Manager or Executive Committee may assess a civil penalty against that person. In determining the amount of the civil penalty, the General Manager or Executive Committee may take into consideration all relevant circumstances, including but not limited to the extent of harm caused by the violation, the economic benefit derived through any non-compliance, the nature and persistence of the violation, the length of time over which the violation occurs, and corrective action, if any, attempted or taken by the person involved. 7. Civil penalties may be assessed as follows: [1-10: a) In an amount which shall not exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) for each day for failing or refusing to furnish technical or monitoring reports; b) In an amount which shall not exceed three thousand dollars ($3,000.00) for each day for failing or refusing to timely comply with any compliance schedules established by the District; c) In an amount which shall not exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) per violation for each day of discharge in violation of any waste discharge limit, permit condition, or requirement issued, reissued, or adopted by the District; d) In any amount which does not exceed ten dollars ($10.00) per gallon for discharges in violation of any suspension, revocation, cease and desist order or other orders, or prohibition issued, reissued, or adopted by the District; 8. An order assessing administrative civil penalties issued by the General Manager shall be final in all respects on the thirty-first (31st) day after its is served on the person unless an appeal and request for hearing is filed with the Executive Committee pursuant to Section 618 no later than the thirtieth (30th) day following such mailing. An order assessing administrative civil penalties issued by the Executive Committee shall be final upon issuance. 9. Copies of the administrative order shall be served on the party served with the administrative complaint, either by personal service or by registered mail to the person at his business or residence address, and upon other persons who Appeared at the hearing and requested a copy of the order. 10. Any person aggrieved by a final order issued by the Executive Committee, after granting review of the order of the General Manager, may obtain review of the order of the Executive Committee in the superior court, pursuant to Government Code Section 54740.6, by filing in the court a petition for writ of mandate within thirty (30) days following the service of a copy of the decision or order issued by the Executive Committee. 11. Payment of any order setting administrative civil penalties shall be made within thirty (30) days of the date the order becomes final. The amount of any administrative civil penalties imposed which have remained delinquent for a period of sixty (60) days shall constitute a lien against the real property of the discharger from which the discharge resulting in the imposition of the civil penalty originated. The lien shall have no effect until recorded with the county recorder. The District may record the lien for any unpaid administrative civil penalties on the ninety-first (91st) day following the date the order becomes final. 12. No administrative civil penalties shall be recoverable under Section 615.D for any violation for which the District has recovered civil penalties through a judicial proceeding filed pursuant to Government Code Section 54740. 61 616. CRIMINAL PENALTIES Any person who violates any provision of this ordinance is guilty of a misdemeanor, which upon conviction is punishable by a fine not to exceed $1,000.00, or imprisonment for not more than thirty (30) days, or both. Each violation and each day in which a violation occurs may constitute a new and separate violation of this Ordinance and shall be subject to the penalties contained herein. 617. APPEALS TO GENERAL MANAGER A. General Any user, permit applicant or permittee affected by any decision, action or determination made by the Division Head may file with the General Manager a written request for an appeal hearing. The request must be received by the District within fifteen (15) days of mailing of notice of the decision, action, or determination of the District to the appellant. The request for hearing shall set forth in detail all facts supporting the appellant's request. B. Notice The General Manager shall, within fifteen (15) days of receiving the request for appeal, and pursuant to Section 107, designate a Department Head or other person to hear the appeal and provide written notice to the appellant of the hearing date, time and place. The hearing date shall not be more than thirty (30) days from the mailing of such notice by certified mail to the appellant unless a later date is agreed to by the appellant. If the hearing is not held within said time due to actions or inactions of the appellant, then the staff decision shall be deemed final. C. Hearinci At the hearing, the appellant shall have the opportunity to present information supporting its position concerning the Division Head's decision, action or determination. The hearing shall be conducted in accordance with procedures established by the General Manager and approved by the District's General Counsel. D. Written Determination After the conclusion of the hearing, the Department Head (or other designee) shall submit a written report to the General Manager setting forth a brief statement of facts found to be true, a determination of the issues presented, conclusions, and a'recommendationwhether to uphold, modify or reverse the Division Head's original decision, action or determination. Upon receipt of the written report, the General Manager shall make his determination and shall issue his decision and order within thirty (30) calendar days of the hearing by his designee. The written decision and order of the General Manager shall be sent by certified mail to the appellant or its legal counsel/representative at the appellant's business address. The order of the General Manager shall be final in all respects on the sixteenth (16th) day after it is mailed to the appellant unless a request for hearing is filed with the Executive Committee pursuant to Section 618, no later than 5:00 p.m. on the fifteenth day following such mailing. 62 618. APPEALS TO THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE A. General Any user, permit applicant, or permittee adversely affected by a decision, action, or determination made by the General Manager may, prior to the date that the General Manager's order becomes final, file a written request for hearing before the Executive Committee of the Joint Boards of Directors accompanied by an appeal fee in the amount established by a separate resolution of the District's Board of Directors. The request for hearing shall set forth in detail all the issues in dispute for which the appellant seeks determination and all facts supporting appellant's request. No later than sixty (60) days after receipt of the request for hearing, the Executive Committee shall either set the matter for a hearing, or deny the request for a hearing. A hearing shall be held by the Executive Committee within sixty-five (65) days from the date of determination granting a hearing, unless a later date is agreed to by the appellant and the Executive Committee. If the matter is not heard within the required time, due to actions or inactions of the appellant, the General Manager's order shall be deemed final. B. Granting Request for Hearing The Executive Committee shall grant all requests for a hearing on appeals concerning permit suspension, revocation, or denial. Whether to grant or deny the request for a hearing on appeals of other decisions of the General Manager shall be within the sole discretion of the Executive Committee. C. Appeal Fee Refund The appeal fee shall be refunded if the Executive Committee denies a hearing or reverses or modifies, in favor of the appellant, the order of. the General Manager. The .fee shall not be refunded if the Executive Committee denies the appeal. D. Written Determination After the hearing, the Executive Committee shall make a determination whether to uphold, modify, or reverse the decision, action, or determination made by the General Manager. The decision of the Executive Committee shall be set forth in writing within sixty-five (65) days after the close of the hearing and shall contain a finding of the facts found to be true, the determination of issues presented, and the conclusions. The written decision and order of the Executive Committee shall be sent by certified mail to the appellant or its legal counsel/representative at the appellant's business address. The order of the Executive Committee shall be final upon its adoption. In the event the Executive Committee fails to reverse or modify the General Manager's order, it shall be deemed affirmed. 618.1 Appeal of Charges and Fees Any user, permit applicant, or permittee affected by any decision, action, or determination by the District, relating to fiscal issues of the District in which the user, applicant, or permittee is located, including but not limited to the imposition and collection of fees, such as 63 connection charges, sewer use charges, special purpose .discharge use charges and wastehauler fees, may request that the District reconsider imposition of such fees or charges. Following review of such a request, the District shall notify the user, permit applicant, or permittee by certified mail of the Districts' decision on the reconsideration request. Any user, permit applicant, or permittee adversely affected by the District's decision on the reconsideration request may file an appeal which shall be heard by the Board of Directors of the District in which the appellant's property is located. The notice of appeal must be received by the District within thirty (30) days of the mailing of the District's decision on the reconsideration request. Notwithstanding the foregoing, appeals of non-compliance sampling fees shall be made pursuant to the appeal procedures set forth in Sections 617 and 618. 619. PAYMENT OF CHARGES A. Except as otherwise provided, all fees, charges and penalties established by this Ordinance are due and payable upon receipt of notice thereof. All such amounts are delinquent if unpaid forty-five (45) days after date of invoice. B. Any charge that becomes delinquent shall have added to it a penalty in accordance with the following: . 1. Forty-six (46) days after date of invoice, a basic penalty of ten percent (10%) of the base invoice amount, not to exceed a maximum of $1,000.00; and 2. A penalty of one and one-half percent (1.5%) per month of the base invoice amount and basic penalty shall accrue from and after the forty-sixth (46th) day after date of invoice. C. Any invoice outstanding and unpaid after ninety (90) days shall be cause for immediate initiation of permit revocation proceedings or immediate suspension of the permit. D. Penalties charged under this Section shall not accrue to those invoices successfully appealed, provided the District .receives written notification of said appeal prior to the payment due date. E. Payment of disputed charges is still required by the due date during District review of any appeal submitted by permittees. 619.1 Collection of DelinQuent Accounts Collection of delinquent accounts shall be in accordance with the District's policy resolution establishing procedures for. collection of delinquent obligations owed to the District, as amended from time to time by the Board of Directors. Any such action for collection may include an application for an injunction to prevent repeated and recurring violations of this Ordinance. 620. RECOVERY'OF COSTS INCURRED BY DISTRICT In the event permittee fails to comply with any of the terms and conditions of the District's Ordinance, a probationary order, a permit suspension or revocation, an ECSA, RCSA, or a permit issued hereunder, the District shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs which may be incurred in order 64 to enforce any of said terms and conditions, with or without filing proceedings in court. 621. FINANCIAL SECURITY/AMENDMENTS TO PERMIT A. Compliance Deposit Permittees that have been subject to enforcement and/or, collection proceedings may be required to deposit with the District an amount determined by the General Manager as necessary to guarantee payment to District of all charges, fees, penalties, costs and expenses that may be incurred in the future, before permission is granted for further discharge to the sewer. B. Delinquent Accounts The District may require an amendment to the permit of any permittee who fails to make payment in full of all fees and charges assessed by the District, including reconciliation amounts, delinquency penalties, and other costs or fees incurred by Permittee. C. Bankruptcy Every Permittee filing any legal action in any court of competent jurisdiction, including the United States Bankruptcy Court, for purposes of discharging its financial debts or obligations or seeking court -ordered, protection from its creditors, shall, within ten (10) days of filing such action, apply for and obtain the issuance of an amendment to its permit. D. Permit Amendments The District shall review and examine Permittee's account to determine whether previously incurred fees and charges have been paid in accordance with time requirements prescribed by this Ordinance. The District may thereafter issue an amendment to the User's permit in accordance with the provisions of Article 3 and Section 621(E) of this Ordinance. E. Security An amendment to a waste discharge permit issued pursuant to Sections 621(B), (C), and (D), may be conditioned upon the Permittee depositing financial security in an amount equal to the average total fees and charges for two (2) calendar quarters during the preceding year. Said deposit shall be used to guarantee payment of all fees and charges incurred for future services and facilities furnished by District and shall not be used by the District to recover outstanding fees and charges incurred prior to the Permittee filing and receiving protection from creditors in the United States Bankruptcy Court. F. Return of Security In the event the Permittee makes payment in full within the time prescribed by this Ordinance of all fees and charges incurred over a period of two (2) years following the issuance of an amendment to the permit pursuant to Sections 621(B), (C), and (D), the District shall either return the security deposit posted by the Permittee or credit their account. 65 622. JUDICIAL REVIEW `- A. Purpose and Effect Pursuant to Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, the District hereby enacts this part to limit to ninety (90) days following final decisions in adjudicatory.administrative hearings the time within which an action can be brought to review such decisions by means of administrative mandamus. B. Definitions As used in this Section, the following terms and words shall have the following meanings: 1. Decision shall mean and include adjudicatory administrative decisions that are made after hearing, or after revoking, suspending, or denying an application for a permit or a license. 2. Complete Record shall mean and include the transcript, if any exists, of the proceedings, all pleadings, all notices and orders, any proposed decision by the General Manager, the final decision, all admitted exhibits, all rejected exhibits in the possession of the District or its offices or agents, all written evidence, and any other papers in the case. 3. Party shall mean a person whose permit has been denied, suspended, or revoked. C. Time Limit for Judicial Review Judicial review of any decision of the District or its officer or agent may be made pursuant to Section 1094.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure only if the petition for writ of mandate is filed not later than the ninetieth (90th) day following the date on which the decision becomes final. If there is no provision for reconsideration in the procedures governing the proceedings or if the date is not otherwise specified, the decision is final on the date it is made. If there is provision for reconsideration, the decision is final upon the expiration of the period during which such reconsideration can be sought; provided that if reconsideration is sought pursuant to such provision the decision is final for the purposes of this Section on the date that reconsideration is rejected. D. Preparation of the Record The complete record of the proceedings shall be prepared by the District officer or agent who made the decision and shall be delivered to the petitioner within ninety (90) days after he has filed written request therefor. The District may recover from the petitioner its actual costs for transcribing or otherwise preparing the record. E. Extension If the petitioner files a request for the record within ten (10) days after the date the decision becomes final, the time within which a petition, pursuant to Section 1094.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, may be filed shall be extended to not later than the thirtieth (30th) day following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the petitioner or the petitioner's attorney of record, if appropriate. 66 F. Notice In making a final decision, the District shall provide notice to the party that the time within which judicial review must be sought is governed by Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure. G. Administrative Civil Penalties Notwithstanding the foregoing in Section 622, and pursuant to Government Code Section 54740.6, judicial review of an order of the Executive Committee imposing administrative civil penalties pursuant to Section 615.D may be made only if the petition for writ of mandate is filed not later than the thirtieth (30th) day following the day on which the order of the Executive Committee becomes final. 67 ARTICLE 7 CONNECTION PERMITS/CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES 701. INTRODUCTION — ALL DISTRICTS A. Connection permits may be required of dwelling units, buildings and developments connecting directly or indirectly to District's sewerage facilities. Included are the connections of laterals to local municipal sewerage facilities and the connection of local municipal sewerage facilities and laterals to District's facilities. B. No permit shall be valid unless the real property to be served by use of the permit is included within the boundaries of the District and within the boundaries of a local sewering agency authorized to maintain public sewering facilities. However, a permit may be issued for property to be served outside the boundaries of a local sewering agency if a local sewering agency makes application for the issuance of such,permit. C. Except as may be provided by an individual District, there will be no capital facilities connection charges assessed to local government agencies for connecting directly or indirectly to District's sewerage facilities; however, a connection permit must be obtained. D. Payment of capital facilities connection charges for connection to District's sewerage facilities shall be required at the time of issuance of the building permit for all construction within the District, excepting in the case of a building legally exempt from the requirement of obtaining a building permit. The payment of the sewer capital facilities connection charge for such buildings will be required at the time of and prior to the issuing of a plumbing connection permit for any construction within the territorial limits of the District. E. A schedule of charges specified herein will be on file in the office of the Secretary of the District and in the Building Department of each City within the District. 68 702. DISTRICT NO. 1 CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES A. District Connection Permit RegL. uired No application for a permit for a connection to a District sewerage facility or to any sewerage facility which discharges into a District sewerage facility shall be considered until a District capital facilities connection charge is paid by the applicant. No connection permit shall be issued unless there is an established use of the property to be served or a valid building permit issued which establishes the use of said property. B. District Connection Charge Amounts (1) Capital facilities connection charge for new construction, dwelling buildings: For each new dwelling unit constructed, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $1,500 per dwelling unit. (2) Capital facilities connection charge for existing dwelling buildings: For the connection of each existing dwelling unit, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $1,500 per dwelling unit. (3) Capital facilities connection charge for new construction and existing structures, other than dwelling buildings: For all other new construction, including, but not limited to, commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels and public buildings, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $300 per 1,000 square feet of floor area contained within such construction, provided that the minimum capital facilities connection charge for such new construction shall be $1,500. (4) Capital facilities connection charge for replacement buildings: For new construction replacing former buildings, the capital facilities connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in paragraphs (A) and (C) above. If such replacement construction is commenced within two (2) years after demolition or destruction of the former building, a credit against such charge shall be allowed and shall be the equivalent capital facilities connection charge for the building being demolished or destroyed, calculated on the basis of current charges for new construction. In no case shall such credit exceed the capital facilities connection charges. (5) Capital facilities connection charges for additions or alterations of existing buildings: In the case of structures where further new construction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of family dwelling buildings or the area of buildings to be used for other than family dwelling buildings, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $1,500 for each dwelling unit added or created, and, in the case of new construction other than family dwelling buildings, it shall be $300 per 1,000 square 69 feet. of additional floor area contained within such new construction, provided such new construction shall contain additional plumbing fixture units. 70 702. DISTRICT -NO. 2 CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES A. District Connection Permit Reauired No application for a permit for a connection to a District sewerage facility or to any sewerage facility which discharges into a District sewerage facility shall be considered until a District capital facilities connection charge is paid by the applicant. No connection permit shall be issued unless there is an established use of the property to be served or a valid building permit issued which establishes the use of said property. B. District Connection Charge Amounts (1) Capital facilities connection charge for new construction, dwelling buildings: For each new dwelling unit constructed, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $1,500 per dwelling unit. (2) Capital facilities connection charge for existing dwelling buildings: - For the connection of each existing dwelling building, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $1,500 per dwelling unit. (3) Capital facilities connection charge for new construction and existing structures, other than dwelling buildings: For all other new construction, including, but not limited to, commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels and public buildings, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $300 per 1,000 square feet of floor area contained within such construction, provided that the minimum capital facilities connection charge for such new construction shall be $1,500. (4) Capital facilities connection charge for replacement buildings: For new construction replacing former buildings, the capital facilities connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in paragraphs (A) and (C) above. If such replacement construction is commenced within two (2) years after demolition or destruction of the former building, a credit against such charge shall be allowed and shall be the equivalent capital facilities connection charge for the building being demolished or destroyed, calculated on the basis of current charges for new construction. In no case shall such credit exceed, the capital facilities connection charges. (5) Capital facilities connection charges for additions or alterations of existing buildings: In the case of structures where further new construction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of dwelling buildings or the area of buildings to be used for other than dwelling buildings, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $1,500 for each dwelling unit added or created, and, in the case of new construction other than family dwelling buildings, it shall be $300 per 1,000 square feet of additional floor area contained within such new construction, 71 provided .such new construction shall contain additional plumbing fixture units. 72 702 kl-S-T-RI-CT N0. -2CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES A. District Connection Permit Recruired No application for a permit for a connection to a District sewerage facility or to any sewerage facility which discharges into a District sewerage facility shall be considered until a District capital facilities connection charge is paid by the applicant. No connection permit shall be issued unless there is an established use of the property to be served or a valid building permit issued which establishes the use of said property. B. District Connection Charge Amounts (1) Capital facilities connection charge for new construction dwelling buildings: For each new dwelling unit constructed, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $1,500 per dwelling unit. (2) Capital facilities connection charge for existing dwelling buildings: For the connection of each existing dwelling unit, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $1,500 per dwelling unit. (3) Capital facilities connection charge for new construction and existing structures, other than dwelling buildings: For all other new construction, including, but not limited to, commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels and public buildings, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $300 per 1,000 square feet of floor area contained within such construction, provided that the minimum capital facilities connection charge for such new construction shall be $1,500. (4) Capital facilities connection charge for replacement buildings: For new construction replacing former buildings, the capital facilities connection charge shall be ndcalculated abon thf such basis as provided in paragraphs (A) replacement construction is commenced within two (2) years after demolition or destruction of the former building, a credit against such charge shall be allowed and shall be the equivalent capital facilities connection charge for the building being demolished or destroyed, calculated on the basis of current charges for new construction. In no case shall such credit exceed the capital facilities connection charges. (5) Capital facilities connection charges for additions or alterations of existing buildings: In the case of structures where further new construction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of dwelling buildings or the area of buildings to be used for other than dwelling buildings, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $1,500 for each dwelling unit added or created, and, in the case of new construction other than family dwelling 73 buildings, it shall be $300 per l► 00o square feA Ot additional floor area contained within such new construction, Provided such new construction shall contain additional plumbing fixture units. 74 702. DISTRICT NO. 5 CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES A. District Connection Permit Reguired No application for a permit for a connection to a District sewerage facility or to any sewerage facility which discharges into a District sewerage facility shall be considered until a District capital facilities connection charge is paid by the applicant. No connection permit shall be issued unless there is an established use of the property to be served or a valid building permit issued which establishes the use of said property. B. District Connection Charge Amounts (1) Capital facilities connection charges for new construction, dwelling buildings: For each new dwelling unit constructed, the capital facilities connection charges shall be $1,500 per dwelling unit. (2) Capital facilities connection charge for existing dwelling buildings: For the connection of each existing dwelling unit, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $1,500 per dwelling unit. (3) Capital facilities connection charge for new construction and existing structures, other than dwelling units: For all other new construction, including, but not limited to, commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels and public buildings, the capital facilities connection charges shall be $300 per 1,000 square feet of floor area contained within such construction, provided that the minimum capital facilities connection charge for such new construction shall be $1,500. (4) Capital facilities connection charges for replacement buildings: For new construction replacing former buildings, the capital facilities connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in paragraphs (A) and (C) above. If such replacement construction is commenced within two (2) years after demolition or destruction of the former building, a credit against such charge shall be allowed, calculated on the basis of the current capital facilities connection charge applicable for the new construction of the building demolished or destroyed. In no case shall such credit exceed the capital facilities connection charge. (5) Capital facilities connection charges for additions or alterations of existing buildings: In the case of structures where further new construction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of dwelling buildings or the area of buildings to be used for other than dwelling buildings, the capital facilities connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in paragraphs (A) and (C) above for each dwelling unit added or created or each 1,000 square feet of additional floor area 75 contained within such new construction, provided that new construction shall contain additional plumbing fixture units. (6) Payment of capital facilities connection charges shall be required at the time of issuance of the building permit for all construction within the District, excepting in the case of a building legally exempt from the requirement of obtaining a building permit in the City of Newport Beach. The payment of the capital facilities connection charge for such exempt buildings will be required at the time of, or prior to, the issuance of a plumbing connection permit for any construction within the District. 76 702. DISTRICT NO. 6 CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES A. District Connection Permit Rectuired No application for a permit for a connection to a District sewerage facility or to any sewerage facility which discharges into a District sewerage facility shall be considered until a District capital facilities connection charge is paid by the applicant. No connection permit shall be issued unless there is an established use of the property to be served or a valid building permit issued which establishes the use of said property. B. District Connection Charge Amounts (1) Capital facilities connection charge for new construction, dwelling buildings: For each new dwelling unit constructed, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $1,500 per dwelling unit. (2) Capital facilities connection charge for existing dwelling buildings: For the connection of each existing dwelling building, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $1,500 per dwelling unit. (3) Capital facilities connection charge for new construction and existing structures, other than dwelling buildings: For all other new construction, including, but not limited to, commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels and public buildings, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $300 per 1,000 square feet of floor area contained within such construction, provided that the minimum capital facilities connection charge for such new construction shall be $1,500. (4) Capital facilities connection charge for replacement buildings: For new construction replacing former buildings, the capital facilities connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in paragraphs (A) and(C) above. If such replacement construction is commenced within two (2) years after demolition or destruction of the former building, a credit against such charge shall be allowed and shall be the equivalent capital facilities connection charge for the building being demolished or destroyed, calculated on the basis of current charges for new construction. In no case shall such credit exceed the capital facilities connection charges. (5) Capital facilities connection charges for additions or alterations of buildings: In the case of structures where further new construction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of family dwelling buildings or the area of buildings to be used for other than family dwelling buildings, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $1,500 for dwelling unit added or created, and, in the case of new construction other than 77 family dwelling buildings, it shall be $300 per 1,000 square feet of additional floor area contained within such new construction, provided such new construction shall contain additional plumbing fixture units. 78 702. DISTRICT NO. 7 CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES A. District Connection Permit Required No application for a permit for a connection to a District sewerage facility or to any sewerage facility which discharges into a District sewerage facility shall be considered until a District capital facilities connection charge is paid by the applicant. No connection permit shall be issued unless there is an established use of the property to be served or a valid building permit issued which establishes the use of said property. B. District Connection Charge Amounts (1) Capital facilities connection charge for new construction, dwelling buildings: For each new dwelling unit constructed, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $1,500 per dwelling unit. (2) Capital facilities connection charge for existing dwelling buildings: For the connection of each. existing dwelling building, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $1,500 per dwelling unit. (3) Capital facilities connection charge for new construction and existing structures, other than dwelling buildings: For all other new construction, including but not limited to, commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels and public buildings, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $300 per 1,000 square feet of floor area contained within such construction, provided that the minimum capital facilities connection charge for such new construction shall be $1,500. (4) Capital facilities connection charge for replacement buildings: For new construction replacing former buildings, the capital facilities connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in paragraphs(A) and (C) above. If such replacement construction is commenced within two (2) years after demolition or destruction of the former building, a credit against such charge shall be allowed and shall be the equivalent capital facilities connection charge for the building being demolished or destroyed, calculated on the basis of current charges for new construction. In no case shall such credit exceed the capital facilities connection charges. (5) Capital facilities connection charges for additions or alterations of existing buildings: In the case of structures where further new construction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of dwelling buildings or the area of buildings to be used for other than dwelling buildings, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $1,500 for each dwelling unit added or created, and, in the case of new construction other than dwelling buildings, it shall be $300 per 1,000 square feet of additional floor 79 area contained within such new construction, provided such new construction shall contain additional plumbing fixture units. (6) Trunk capital facilities connection charge, residential uses: Family dwelling unit: $6 per front foot for the real property fronting on and connecting to a trunk sewer, provided that no such charge shall be less than $400, plus the applicable regular capital facilities connection charge for dwelling units hereinabove specified. (7) Trunk capital facilities connection charge, commercial or industrial establishments: $10 per front foot for the real property fronting on and connecting to a trunk sewer, provided that no such front foot charge shall be less than $500.00 plus the applicable regular capital facilities connection charge for new construction and existing structures other than dwelling buildings hereinabove specified. (8) Capital facilities connection charge, off -site sewers not a part of Master Plan relative to reimbursement agreements: The charges for connections to off -site sewers which are not included as part of the District Master Plan and for which a Non -Master Plan Reimbursement Agreement has been entered into between the District and the property owner shall be in the amount provided for in said Agreement. The amount set forth in said Agreement shall be the amount due whether the original Agreement is still in force, has been extended, or has expired. These capital facilities connection charges shall be in addition to any other charges hereinabove established for the property connecting to said facilities. (9) Assessment District capital facilities connection charge: The regular capital facilities connection charges provided in the preceding subsections of this section, plus a sum of money equal to the assessment charge without interest, or Treasurer's charge which would have been made against the real property on which said improvements are located had said real property been assessed within the, Assessment District which constructed or acquired the Assessment District sewer to which connection is made. 80 702. DISTRICT NO. 11 CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES A. District Connection Permit Recxuired No application for a permit for a connection to a District sewerage facility or to any sewerage facility which discharges into a District sewerage facility shall be considered until a District capital facilities connection charge is paid by the applicant. No connection permit shall be issued unless there is an established use of the property to be served or a valid building permit issued which establishes the use of said property. B. District Connection Charge Amounts (1) Capital facilities connection charge for new construction, dwelling buildings: For each new dwelling unit constructed, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $1,500 per dwelling unit. (2) Capital facilities connection charge for existing dwelling buildings: For the connection of each existing dwelling building, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $1,500 per dwelling unit. (3) Capital facilities connection charge for new construction and existing structures, other than dwelling buildings: For all other new construction, including, but not limited to, commercial and industrial buildings, hotels and motels and public buildings, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $300 per 1,000 square feet of floor area contained within such construction, provided that the minimum capital facilities connection charge for such new construction shall be $1,500. (4) Capital facilities connection charge for replacement buildings: For new construction replacing former buildings, the capital facilities connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in paragraphs (A) and (C) above. If such replacement construction is commenced within two (2) years after demolition or destruction of the former building, a credit against such charge shall be allowed and shall be the equivalent capital facilities connection charge for the building being demolished or destroyed, calculated on the basis of current charges for new construction. In no case shall such credit exceed the capital facilities connection charges. (5) Capital facilities connection charges for additions or alterations of existing buildings: In the case of structures where further new construction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of family dwelling buildings or the area of buildings to be used for other than family dwelling buildings, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $1,500 for each dwelling unit added or created, and, in the case of new construction other than family dwelling buildings, it shall be $300 per 1,000 square 81 feet. of additional floor area contained within such new construction, provided such new construction shall contain additional plumbing fixture units. 82 702. DISTRICT NO. 13 CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES A. District Connection Permit Required No application for a permit for a connection to a District sewerage facility or to any sewerage facility which discharges into a District sewerage facility shall be considered until a District capital facilities connection charge is paid by the applicant. No connection permit shall be issued unless there is an established use of the property to be served or a valid building permit issued which establishes the use of said property. B. District Connection Charoe Amounts (1) Capital facilities connection charge for new construction, dwelling buildings: For each new dwelling unit constructed, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $1,500 per dwelling unit. (2) Capital facilities connection charge for existing dwelling buildings: For the connection of each existing dwelling unit, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $1,500 per dwelling unit. (3) Capital. facilities connection charge for new construction and existing structures, other than dwelling buildings: For all other new construction, including but not limited to, commercial and industrial buildings, hotel and motels and buildings, the capital facilities connection charge shall be $300 per 1,000 square feet of floor area contained within such construction, provided that the minimum capital facilities connection charge for such new construction shall be $1,500. (4) Capital facilities connection charge for replacement buildings: For new construction replacing former buildings, the capital facilities connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in Paragraphs (A) and (C) above. If such replacement construction is commenced within two (2) years after demolition or destruction of the former building, a credit against such charge shall be allowed and shall be the equivalent capital facilities connection charge for the building being demolished or destroyed, calculated on the basis of current charges for new construction. In no case shall such credit exceed the capital facilities connection charges. (5) Capital facilities connection charges for additions or alterations to existing buildings: In the case of structures where further new construction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy of dwelling buildings, the capital facilities connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in Paragraphs (A) and (C) above for each dwelling unit added or created, or each 1,000 square feet of additional floor area contained within such new construction, provided such new construction shall contain additional plumbing fixture units. 83 (b). Capital facilities connection charges will be assessed to local government agencies for connecting directly or indirectly to the Districts' sewerage facilities. 84 703. ANNUAL SUPPLEMENTAL SANITARY SEWER USE CHARGE Every parcel of real property located within the District which is improved with structures designed for residential, commercial, or industrial use, and connected to the District's system, may be subject to an annual supplemental sanitary sewer use charge in an amount adopted by the Board of Directors by separate Ordinance. 704. EXCEPTIONS Except as expressly provided in Sections 308 and 705 hereof, relating to exemptions from the payment of charges, the provisions of this Ordinance shall apply to all properties within the District, including those properties otherwise deemed exempt from payment of taxes or assessments by provisions of the State Constitution or statute, including properties owned by other public agencies or tax exempt organizations. 705. EXEMPTIONS AND APPEALS In recognition that certain legal parcels of real property exist within the District which are not connected to the District system, it is the intent of the District that said parcels be exempt totally or in part from the payment of charges as prescribed herein. Any property owner may appeal the assessment of the charges and submit a claim for rebate to the District on the forms prescribed and provided by the District, within one hundred twenty (120) days after the annual bill is mailed. All applications for rebate of the annual sewer service charge will be determined by the General Manager of the District, who may grant a partial or full rebate or adjustment of the charge based on receiving satisfactory proof than an inequity exists between the amount charged and the amount of wastewater discharged to the District's systems. Such inequities may include, but are not limited to the following instances: A. The use of parcel differs from the use indicated by the charge. B. No service connection to the District's system exists for the parcel charged. C. The principal water use is agricultural. D. Any other use wherein the amount of wastewater discharged to the District's system is significantly less on a regular basis than the amount that would normally be expected to be discharged by the class of property in question. 706. CREDIT FOR INDUSTRIAL PERMITTEES A credit shall be allowed to all dischargers permitted pursuant to Article 3 of this Ordinance in an amount equal to the annual supplemental sanitary sewer service charge. Said credit shall be made in the same manner as credit is allowed for ad valorem taxes pursuant to Section 302.6, 303.6, and 304.6(B)(4) above. 85 ARTICLE 8 SEVERABILITY 801. SEVERABILITY If any provision of these regulations or the application to any or circumstances is held invalid, the remainder of the regulations or the application of such provision to other persons or other circumstances shall not be affected. 86 ARTICLE 9 REPEAL 901. REPEAL The following Ordinances are hereby repealed on the effective date hereof and all Ordinance or parts of Ordinances inconsistent with this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent that they are inconsistent with the -provisions of this Ordinance: District No. 1 - Ordinance No. 113 District No. 2 - Ordinance No. 208 District No. 3 - Ordinance No. 311 District No. 5 - Ordinance No. 520 District'No. 6 - Ordinance No. 614 District No. 7 - Ordinance No. 722 District No. 11 - Ordinance No. 1110 District No. 13 - Ordinance No. 1305 District No. 14 - Ordinance No. 1402 87 Section II: The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the District as required by law. Said Ordinance shall become effective February 7, 1992 after its adoption by the Board of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, at a regular meeting held January 8, 1992. s8 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING SOURCE CONTROL FEES, ADMINISTRATIVE FEES, NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES, AND MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES ******************** The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. of Orange County, California ("District") does hereby find: A. That the District is required by federal and state law, including the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251, et sea.) and the General Pretreatment Regulations (40 C.F.R. 403) to implement and enforce a program for the regulation of wastewater discharges to the District's sewers; and B. That the District is required by federal, state, and local law to meet applicable standards of treatment plant effluent quality; and C. That pursuant to these requirements, the Board of Directors adopted Ordinance No. , establishing wastewater discharge regulations; and D. That the District incurs additional costs in conducting non-compliance sampling of those industrial wastewater dischargers who violate the District's industrial wastewater discharge regulations; and 1 E. That Ordinance No. provides that the Board of Directors is to establish various fees and charges to recover those costs to the District which are made necessary by industrial wastewater dischargers who violate the District's industrial wastewater discharge regulations; and F. That the adoption of the proposed fees and charges will provide revenue to assist in the payment of the costs incurred by the District in enforcing its industrial wastewater discharge regulations; and G. That the fees and charges hereby established by this Ordinance do not exceed the estimated reasonable costs to the District for the administration and implementation of non-compliance sampling associated with the industrial waste control program; and H. That the administrative reports upon which the fees are based have been made available to the public and have been presented to the Board of Directors at a public meeting, in accordance with applicable provisions of law; and That Ordinance No. provided for the Board of Directors to establish various rates of fees and charges to recover the costs to the District of implementing its Source Control program in addition to the non-compliance sampling fees: and J. That the adoption of the proposed fees and charges will provide revenue to assist in the payment of costs to the District to provide sewerage collection, treatment and disposal service, together with conducting all regulatory and administrative services related to the industrial dischargers/users of the District's systems; and 2 K. That an administrative report, including financial analysis and an engineering report has been prepared by the District setting forth and identifying the needs and costs of implementing the District's source control program; and L. That the administrative and engineering reports have been made available to the public and have been presented to the Board at a public meeting, all in accordance with applicable provisions of law; and M. That the new and revised fees and charges established by this Ordinance do not exceed the estimated amount required to provide the sewerage service and administration, for which the fee is levied. N. That the adoption of this Ordinance is statutorily exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to the provisions of Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) and California Code of Regulations Section 15273(a). NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. of Orange County, California, does hereby ORDAIN as follows: Section 1: Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to recover those costs incurred by the District when performing non-compliance sampling of industrial wastewater dischargers who have violated the Districts' industrial wastewater discharge regulations. The fees and charges hereby established are to be paid by the violating industrial wastewater discharger who has caused the District to perform the non-compliance sampling. Revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance shall be used to defray the costs incurred by the District in performing the non-compliance sampling and 3 costs incurred by the District in performing the non-compliance sampling and subsequent laboratory analysis. The purpose of this Ordinance is also to consolidate existing fees and charges with the proposed non-compliance fees as discussed in Section 2 into one Ordinance. The existing fees and charges are shown in Table A. Section 2: Non -Compliance Sampling Fees. Commencing February 7, 1992, any industrial wastewater discharger who violates the District's industrial wastewater discharge regulations and causes the District to conduct non-compliance sampling of that industry's wastewater shall pay a non-compliance sampling fee in the sum or sums set forth in Table B. Section 3: Severability. If any provisions of this Ordinance or the application to any person or circumstance is held invalid by order of court, the remainder of the Ordinance or the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected. Section 4: Effective Date. These fees shall become effective February 7, 1992. Section 5: Certification. The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the District as required by law. 4 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the affirmative vote of greater than two-thirds of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. of Orange County, California, at a regular meeting held , 1992. ATTEST: Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. of Orange County, California Chairman of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. of Orange County, California 5 TABLE "A" SOURCE CONTROL FEES, ADMINISTRATIVE FEES, AND MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES Permit Fees: Class I Permit $250.00/Year (Ord. No. , Sec. 302.3) Class II Permit $100.00/3 Years (Ord. No. , Sec. 303.3) Class III Permit $ 75.00/3 Years (Ord. No. , Sec. 304.3) Special Purpose Discharge Permit $250.00/Year (Ord. No. , Sec. 305.3) Wastehauler Discharge Permit $ 75.00/Year (Ord. No. , Sec. 306.3) Wastehauler Discharge Permittee Decal: Initial Issue $25.00 Replacement $50.00 Wastehauler Discharge Permittee Entry Card: Initial Issue $ 50.00 Replacement $100.00 Wastehauler Discharge Permittee - Charge for Use: Waste originating within District Waste originating outside District Transportable Treatment Unit Discharge Permit Fees (Ord. No. , Sec. 307.3) $0.02/gallon of truck capacity $0.04/gallon of truck capacity $250.00/Year TABLE "A" (CONTINUED) SOURCE CONTROL FEES, ADMINISTRATIVE FEES, AND MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES Administrative/Processing Fees: District Collection of Tax Data $100.00/Permit (Ord. No. , Sec. 302.6(c), 303.6(c), 304.6(c)) District Collection of Water Consumption Data $100.00/Permit (Ord. No. , Sec. 302.6(d), 303.6(d), 304.6(d)) Appeal Hearing Filing Fee $400.00 (Ord. No. , Sec. 618) TABLE "B° NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES 1. Total Cost of Processing and Sampling a Minor Violation $200.00/per occurrence 2. Total Cost of Processing and Sampling a Major Violation a $455.00/per occurrence 3. Additional Costs for Specific Analyses as Required A. Heavy Metals Analysis $ 16.00 (This price includes analysis of all the following:) Cadmium Chromium Copper Nickel Lead Silver Zinc B. Arsenic Analysis $ 16.00 C. Mercury Analysis $130.00 D. 601 /602 Analysis $ 84.00 E. 604 Analysis $153.00 F. 606 Analysis $180.00 G. 608 Analysis $193.00 H. 624 Analysis $225.00 I. 625 Analysis $375.00 J. Ammonia Analysis as Nitrogen $ 24.00 K. Biochemical Demand (BOD) Analysis $ 24.00 TABLE "B" (CONTINUED) NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES L. BOD and Suspended Solids Analysis $ 30.00 M. Chemical Oxygen Demand Analysis $ 12.00 N. Conductivity Analysis $ 6.00 O. Cyanide (Amenable) Analysis $ 48.00 P. Cyanide (Total) Analysis $ 30.00 Q. Dissolved Mineral Solids Analysis $ 12.00 R. Grease and Oil (Hexane Soluble Matter) Analysis $ 73.00 S. Grease and Oil (Mineral Partition) Analysis $ 73.00 T. Total Organic Nitrogen Analysis $ 24.00 U. pH Analysis $ 73.00 V. Phenol Analysis $ 73.00 W. Suspended Solids (Total Only) Analysis $ 6.00 X. Suspended Solids (Total and Volatile) Analysis $ 12.00