Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-07-17 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS / \e OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8121, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92]28-812] a, gy 10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92]08-]018 �+°ce coin (114)962-2411 July 10, 1991 NOTICE OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 WEDNESDAY, JULY 17, 1991 - 7: 30 P .M. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California An adjourned regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 , 11 , 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. ��..secretary � Tentatively-Scheduled Upcoming Meetings: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday, July 24th, at 5: 30 p.m. BUILDING COMMITTEE - Thursday, July 25th, at 5: 30 p.m. CONSERVATION, RECYLE - Thursday, August 1st, at 5: 30 p.m. AND REUSE COMMITTEE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 9f ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 108Ca ELLIS AVENUE oO.BOx 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-y—� P14I M2.241 I JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings August Aug 14, 1991 None Scheduled September Sep 11, 1991 Sep 25, 1991 October Oct 09, 1991 Oct 23, 1991 November Nov 13 , 1991 None Scheduled December Dec 11, 1991 None Scheduled January Jan 08, 1992 Jan 22, 1992 February Feb 12, 1992 Feb 26 , 1992 March Mar 11 , 1992 Mar 25, 1992 April Apr 08, 1992 Apr 22, 1992 May May 13, 1992 May 27 , 1992 June Jun 10 , 1992 Jun 24, 1992 July Jul 08, 1992 Jul 22, 1992 �.Ir' July 2, 1991 REMINDER C COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 6 14 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California `r This is to remind you of the Boards, action changing the Regular July Joint Board Meeting date from Wednesday, July 10, 1991 , at at 7: 30 p.m. , to Wednesda , Jul 17 1991 at 7 : 30 .m, , to avoid a conflict with a sta ewide conference of the League of California Cities in Monterey scheduled for July 10-12, 1991 . A regular meeting notice and agenda material will be mailed to you prior to the July 17th meeting date. S cretary BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P.O.Box 8427.10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County, California Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone; (714)962-2411 �- JOINT BOARDS AGENDA ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING JULY 17, 1991 - 7: 30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call ( 3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4 ) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) (5 ) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. (6 ) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. (a) Report of Joint Chairman (b) Report of General Manager (c) Report of General Counsel .\J (7) Annual election of Joint Chairman (Nominee: Director William D. Mahoney) (B) Annual election of vice Joint Chairman 7/17/91 (9) EACH DISTRICT + ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman: District 1 - June 12, 1991 regular District 2 - June 12, 1991 regular District 3 - June 12, 1991 regular District 5 - June 12, 1991 regular District 6 - June 12, 1991 regular District 7 - June 12, 1991 regular District 11 - June 12, 1991 regular District 13 - June 12, 1991 regular - District 14 - June 12, 1991 regular (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless ' a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District. ) See pages "A" and "e" 6/05/91 6/19/91 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 541,500.44 $ 625,594.93 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 522,264.39 4,788,020.43 Joint Working Capital Fund - 180,430.37 154,910.52 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 113,126 .96 8,336 .26 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 7,917 .12 259.83 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 1,798,115.79 6,566 .32 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 37,170.51 26,488.34 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 8,954.92 5,269.54 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 5,842.49 200.77 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 66,872.12 17,852.97 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 8,770.48 9,743 .20 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 290.49 47.87 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 1,201 ,226.07 630. 37 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 1,732.67 45.61 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 6 7 JOINT - 3,981.10 -0- DISTRICTS NOS. 7 6 14 JOINT - 3,907.67 6,850.00 $4,502,103.59 15,650,816.9I6- / -2- 7/17/91 (11 ) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 11(a) THROUGH 11(n) All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. The Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of the following resolutions authorizing and directing execution and filing of documents necessary for Federal and State Clean Water Grants and Loans under 33 U.S.C. , 1251 at seq. ; Chapters 12.5, 13, 14 and is; and Division 7 of the California Water Code, and providing certain assurances in connection with the 1991-92 Joint Works Improvements and Additions: See page "C" District No. Resolution No. 1 91-92-1 2 91-93-2 3 91-94-3 5 91-95-5 6 91-96-6 7 91-97-7 11 91-98-11 13 91-99-13 14 91-100-14 -3- 7/17/91 (11 ) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (b) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to South Coast Air Quality Management District in an amount not to exceed $318,000.00 for payment of various fees required by SCAQMD regulations, payable during fiscal year 1991-92, estimated as follows: Type of Fee Amount Annual Emissions $95,000 Annual Operating Permit and Permit Evaluation 75,000 Nonattainment Pollutants, Precursors and Toxics 25,000 Source Test Analysis 63,000 Miscellaneous 60,000 TOTAL 318 000 (c) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc. in the amount of $54,440.00 plus tax and freight, for Purchase of a SBE-9 CTD with PAR Sensor and Fluorometer (Specification No. E-201) to be used for sampling and analyses of ocean waters at Districts - offshore stations. (d) Consideration of the following actions relative to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for preparation of Wastewater Quality, Diversion and Treatment Study: (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for said services. See page "D" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 91-101, approving said agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $88,055.00. See page "E" -4- 7/17/91 (11 ) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (a) Consideration of the following actions relative to Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17, providing for additional Resident Project Engineer services: (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for said additional services. See page "F" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 91-102, approving Addendum No. 4 to said agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for said additional services, on a full-time basis through the end of the construction phase, at the rate of $80.00 per hour, including labor, overhead and profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $51,200.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $641,703.00 to an amount not to exceed $692,903.00. See page "G" (f) Consideration of the following actions relative to Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with The Project Solutions Company for �✓ specialized engineering and construction inspection services re instrumentation/process control systems included in various master-planned construction projects, providing for an extension of the term of said agreement and revision of the, hourly-rate fee schedule: (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for said additional services. See page nH" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 91-103, . approving Addendum No. 2 to said agreement with The Project Solutions Company for said services, providing for an extension of said agreement for up to three years, on an as-needed basis, from September 1, 1991 to August 31, 1994, and increasing the hourly rates as follows, plus direct expenses at cost for out-of-town travel: See page "I" Agreement Period Hourly Rate 9/01/91 - 8/31/92 $ 59.00 9/01/92 - 8/31/93 62.00 9/01/93 - 8/31/94 65.00 -5- 7/17/91 (11) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (g) Consideration of the following actions relative to Soils, Concrete and Other Materials Testing Services for various Collection System and Treatment Plant Projects, Specification No. 5-055: (1 ) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fees with the following firms for said testing services. See page "J" (2) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to award purchase order contracts to the following firms for said testing services for the period July 18, 1991 through July 17, 1992, with provision for two one-year extensions: Type and Location Annual Amount Firm of Work Not to Exceed Converse Soils, Concrete/ $ 50,000.00 Consultants Collection System Professional Soils, Concrete/ 50,000.00 Services Collection System 1 Industries, Inc. �••s� Twining Labs Full Service/Plants 100,000.00 of Southern and Collection California System Smith-Emery Full Service/Plants 100,000.00 Company (h) Consideration of the following resolutions approving the execution and delivery of the First Supplemental Trust Agreement to the Capital Improvement Program 1990-92 Series A $100 million Certificates of Participation in order to provide that the record date for the certificates in the .daily mode be changed to the last day of the month: See page "A" , District Resolution No. 1 91-104-1 2 91-105-2 3 91-106-3 5 91-107-5 6 91-108-6 ' 7 91-109-7 / 11 91-110-11 `�►� 13 91-111-13 14 91-112-14 -6- 7/17/91 i (11) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (i) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to employ Safety and Health Manager at a salary above the mid-point of the salary range (currently $4343-$5645 per month) for this position classification to head the Districts$ health, safety and security programs. (j ) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to employ Air Quality Manager at a salary above the mid-point of the salary range (currently $4342-5645 per month) for this position classification to head the new Air Quality Management Division in the Districts' Technical Services Department. DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 7 6 11 ONLY (k) Consideration of the following resolutions adopting fees, procedures and policies concerning annexations of territory to the Districts, incorporating the findings of the "2020 VISION^ Master Plan, determining that the adoption of the annexation fees is statutorily exempt under CEQA and repealing the resolutions adopted in 1982: See page "L" Repealing Acreage Fee Resolution Resolution w/Tax w/o Tax Dist. No. No. Exchange Exchange 2 91-113-2 82-136-2 $2,922 $3,908 3 91-114-3 82-137-3 $3,154 $4,139 5 91-115-5 82-138-5 $3,054 $4,084 7 91-116-7 82-139-7 $2,902 $3,883 11 91-117-11 82-140-11 $4,843 $5,830 DISTRICT 2 (1) Consideration of the following actions relative to the Professional Services Agreement with willdan Associates for preparation of a project report to evaluate alternate alignments and make recommendations for a portion of the Santa Ana River Interceptor, between Grove Street and Yorba Park, to be known as Santa Ana River Interceptor Relief Sewer, Contract No. 2-31: (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for said services. See page "M" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 91-130-2, approving said agreement with Willdan Associates for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $56,700.00. See page "N" -7- 7/17/91 (11) DISTRICT 3 - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (m) Consideration of Resolution No. 91-131-3, approving Agreement with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Alamitos and the City of Los Alamitos, electing a tax increment pass-through relative to the Los Alamitos Redevelopment Project, in accordance with District policy and pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33676 (a) (1) . See page "0" DISTRICTS 7 & 14 (n) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Baker Force Mains, from Main Street Pump Station to Bristol Street, Contract No. 14-1-2, authorizing an addition of $8,074.00 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Co. , Inc. , for two items of additional work. see page "P" END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (12) ALL DISTRICTS Considers on of items deleted from Consent Calendar if any -8- • 7/17/91 (13 )' ALL DISTRICTS (a) Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee's written report of the meeting on June 26, 1991 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) . (b) Consideration of action on items recommended by said Committee: (1 ) Individual District Budgets: (a) Staff report re proposed fiscal year 1991-92 budgets (b) DISTRICT 1 Roll approving 1991-92 fiscal year budget in the following amounts: . Operating Fund $ 18, 368,000 Capital Facilities Fund 24,828,000 Construction Fund - 1986 2,620,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 19,834,000 TOTAL $ 65,650,000 (c) DISTRICT 2 Rol— l cal vote approving 1991-92 fiscal year budget in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 49,266,000 Capital Facilities Fund 99,735,000 Construction Fund - 1986 4,690,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 57,780,000 TOTAL $211,471,000 (d) DISTRICT 3 Rom call vote approving 1991-92 fiscal year budget in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 57 ,573,000 Capital Facilities Fund 95,281,000 Construction Fund - 1986 5,085,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 51, 358,000 TOTAL $209 ,297,000 [ITEM (13 ) (b) (1 ) CONTINUED ON PAGE 10] �� -9- (13) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from Page 9) 7/17/91 (b) (1) (e) DISTRICT 5 RofI ca vote approving 1991-92 fiscal year budget in the following amounts: l ' Operating Fund $ 13,239,000 ems' Capital Facilities Fund 19,747,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 24,097,000 TOTAL $ 57,083,000 (f) DISTRICT 6 Roll cal�vote approving 1991-92 fiscal year budget in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 10,253,000 Capital Facilities Fund 13,572,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 9,262,000 TOTAL S 33,087,000 (g) DISTRICT 7 - Rol ca vote approving 1991-92 fiscal year budget in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 19 ,599 ,000 Capital Facilities Fund 39,559,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 22,793,000 ^ Bond 6 Interest Fund - 1962 228,000 TOTAL S 82,179,000 (h) DISTRICT 11 Ro ca vote approving 1991-92 fiscal year budget in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 16,174,000 Capital Facilities Fund 21,552,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 13,697,000 Bond & Interest Fund - 1958 36,000 TOTAL S 51,459,000 (i) DISTRICT 13 Ro ca vote approving 1991-92 fiscal year budget in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 1, 371,000 Capital Facilities Fund 13,079,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 91000 TOTAL $ 14,459,000 [ITEM (13) (b) (1) CONTINUED ON PAGE 111 -10- ' 7/17/91 (13) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from Page 10) (b) (1 ) (j ) DISTRICT 14 Roll—c—all—vote approving 1991-92 fiscal \� year budget in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 1,709,000 Capital Facilities Fund 9,964,000 TOTAL $ 11 ,673,000 (k) DISTRICTS 1 2 3 5 6 7 fit_ 1��1 ONLY Consi era ion of a following reesolutions selecting the annual change in California per capita personal income as the cost-of-living adjustment factor, and establishing the annual Gann Appropriations Limit for fiscal year 1991-92 for each District in accordance with the provisions of Division 9 of Title 1 of the California Government Code. See page_ DISTRICT RESO. NO. LIMITATION 1 91-118-1 $ 2,465,000 2 91-119-2 9,144,000 3 91-120-3 12,414,000 5 91-121-5 2, 316,000 6 - 91-122-6 1,466,000 �✓ 7 91-123-7 3,596,000 11 91-124-11 2,488,000 13 --- Not Applicable 14 --- Not Applicable (14) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file report and recommendation of the Fiscal Policy Committee dated June 26, 1991 , regarding 1991-92 Workers' Compensation Excess Insurance Coverage. (Copy enclosed with Directors` agenda material) . (b) Consideration of motion ratifying actibn of Fiscal Policy Committee in placing statutory Excess Workers' Compensation insurance coverage with Coast Insurance, with $250,000 self-insured retention, effective July 1, 1991, for an annual premium not to exceed $43,775.00. (15) ALL DISTRICTS Repor o e Building Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee's written report of the meeting on June 20, 1991 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) . -11- 7/17/91 (16) ALL DISTRICTS Consi ern of the following actions relative to Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9: (a) verbal staff report (b) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the gas' plans and specifications for said job, changing the bid date from April 16, 1991 to May 21, 1991, revising the number of days allowed for completion of project and the sum to be assessed for liquidated damages. (c) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said job, making miscellaneous technical clarifications eliminating certain permit requirements re Santa Ana River Channel and adding a box conduit alternative to the 120-inch pipe. (d) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 3 to the plans and specifications for said job, changing the bid date from May 21, 1991 to June 25, 1991, making additional technical clarifications. (a) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 4 to the plans and specifications for said job, including Job No. J-22-2, Replacement of Portion of Standby Ocean Outfall, in said project, making additional minor technical clarifications and transmitting revised Schedule of Prices. (f) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 5 to the plans and specifications for said job, changing the bid date from June 25, 1991 to July 2, 1991, addressing possible sales tax increases and making additional minor technical clarifications and modifications. (g) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 6 to the plans and specifications for said job, providing for contractor's use of adjacent leasehold property and modifying trench and backfill requirements. (h) Consideration of Resolution No. 91-125, receiving and - filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for said project to Colich Bros. , Inc. dba Colich and Sons, in the total amount of $21,32B,600.00. See page "R" (17) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of the following actions relative to Plant No. 1 Control Center Instrumentation, Job No. J-23-2, and Replacement of Computerized Monitoring System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-44: (See separate enclosure included with Directors' agenda material) andSee page "S., (a) verbal staff report (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated June 24, 1991. [ITEM (17) CONTINUED ON PAGE 131 -12- (17) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from Page 12) 7/17/91 (c) Consideration Of motion to receive and file General Counsel's Memoranda dated July S,' 1991 and July 9, 1991 relative to said protests. (d) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said jobs, changing the bid date from April 16, 1991 to May 21, 1991 and making miscellaneous technical clarifications. (a) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said jobs, making miscellaneous technical clarifications, providing for installation of preapproved equipment by manufacturers, and revising insurance requirements. (f) Consideration of motion to receive and file the following letters protesting award of Job Nos. J-23-2 and P2-44 to either of the two apparent low bidders on the basis that their bids did not meet the specifications: From Dated Sacks Electric Company 5/22/91 Sacks Electric Company 6/04/91 Johnson Yokogawa Corporation 6/04/91 Westinghouse Electric Corporation 6/05/91 Pacific Parts and Controls, Inc. 6/27/91 Johnson Yokogawa Corporation 7/03/91 Sacks Electric Company 7/05/91 (g) Consideration of motion to receive and file the following letters supporting award of Job Nos. J-23-2 and P2-44 to the low bidder, HBO Technology: From Dated HSQ Technology 5/30/91 EMA, Inc. 5/30/91 - Allen Bradley - 6/06/91 HBO Technology 6/07/91 HSQ Technology 6/07/92 EMA, Inc. 6/25/91 (h) Oral comments, if any (i) Consultant and staff response to comments (j ) Board consideration of said protests (k) Consideration of motion declaring the bid of JWP controls non-responsive and rejecting said bid. (1) Consideration of motion declaring bid of HBO Technology responsive to specifications and adopting Resolution No. 91-126, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for said Job NOS. J-23-2 and P2-44 to HBO Technology ln,the total amount Of $3,752,000.00. OR Consideration of motion concurring with protesters, rejecting bid of HSQ Technology and all other bids, and directing staff to readvertise and rebid said projects. -13- 7/17/91 (18) ALL DISTRICTS ConsTdera'�n of the following actions relative to monitoring services required as a condition of the Districts' - 301(h) ocean discharge permit: See page "T" (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 91-127, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contracts for Marine Monitoring Vessel for Water Quality Surveying, Specification No. S-053 (Revised) , to NBC Analytical Systems, Inc., for the period July 1, 1991 to June 30, 1992, for a total amount not to exceed $48,229.00, and to Seaventures, for the period beginning September 1, 1991 to June 30, 1992, for a total amount not to exceed $13,440.00. See pages U. and V. (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 91-128, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Marine Monitoring Vessel for Coastal Waters, Specification No. S-054 (Revised) to Enchanter, Inc. for the period July 1, 1991 to June 30, 1992, for an estimated annual cost of $105,840.00. See pages W.and X. (19) ALL DISTRICTS Consn of motion authorizing the General Manager to execute Gas Service Agreements with the Southern California Gas Company, in form approved by the General Counsel, to allow purchase of supplemental natural gas at the standard. cogeneration rate established by the California Public Utilities Commission for use in the Districts' Central Power Generation Systems at Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2 and for other plant uses. (20) ALL DISTRICTS Cons� n of Resolution No. 91-129, approving and authorizing participation in the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement creating the National Water Research Institute, between the Sanitation Districts, Irvine Ranch Water District, Orange County Water District, Municipal Water District of Orange County and San Juan Basin Authority; approving an annual contribution of $50,000 for Districts' share of the administrative budget of said Institute; and authorizing the Joint Chairman to appoint the Districts' representative to the Board of Directors of the Institute. See page "Y" (21) ALL DISTRICTS Closed Session: During the course of conducting the a ness as -forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards, the Chairman may convene the Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code sections 54956.9 or 54957.6. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employee compensation; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as final actions are taken by the Directors on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary , I (b) Reconvene in regular session (c) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session. -14- 7/17/91 (22) ALL DISTRICTS O ear u—siness and communications or supplemental agenda \J items, if any (23 ) DISTRICT 3 O he uussiness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (24 ) DISTRICT 3 Consi eration of motion to adjourn (25) DISTRICT 5 O r ups iness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (26) DISTRICT 5 fa— Cons of motion to adjourn (27 ) DISTRICT 6 Offer business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (28) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (29 ) DISTRICT 11 O er usiness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 30) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn ( 31) DISTRICT 13 Ott— e�ness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (32) DISTRICT 13 Cons deration of motion to adjourn ( 33) DISTRICT 14 O er usiness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 34) DISTRICT 14 Consider-Rion of motion to adjourn �' -15- 7/17/91 (35) DISTRICTS 1 & 2 (a) Consideration of the following actions relative to Amendment No. 1 to 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan; and supplement No. 2 to Program Environmental Impact Report on said Amendment to 1989 Master Plan: (1 ) Verbal report of staff (2) Consideration of motion to receive and file Project Report re Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30, prepared by Boyle Engineering Corporation (Copy enclosed with Directors- agenda material) ( 3) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated June 20, 1991 re Supplement No. 2 to Program Environmental Impact Report re said Amendment No. 1 to 1989 Master Plan. See page "Z" (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment relative to said Contract No. 2-30, finding that said project could have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, Supplement No. 2 to the Program Environmental Impact Report will be required. See pages "AA" and "BB" (b) 'Consideration of the following actions relative to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for preparation of Supplement No. 2 to Program Environmental Impact Report on Amendment NO. 1 to the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan; and for planning, design and construction support services re Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30: (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for said services. See page "CC" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 91-132, approving said agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $223,330.00. See page "DD" ( 36) DISTRICT 1 OFEer Tusiness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 37) DISTRICT 1 Con ration of motion to adjourn 1 _ / \a.r -16- 7/17/91 (38) DISTRICT 2 Ott er business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 39) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn (40) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of the following actions relative to Relocation of Michelson Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-2: (a) verbal report of staff (b) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said job, clarifying provisions relative to the contract documents. (c) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said job, providing for the project to include construction of a 24-inch sewer from Carlson Avenue to the new pump station and abandonment of the existing pump station and appurtenant facilities. (d) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 3 to the plans and specifications for said job, changing the bid date from June 18, 1991 to June 25, 1991, clarifying the sales tax rate, transmitting revised Schedule of Prices and including City of Irvine Encroachment Permit Standard Conditions. (a) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 4 to the plans and specifications for said job, clarifying requirements re traffic control and working hours. (f) Consideration of Resolution No. 91-133-7 , receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for said project to Mitchell Pacific Constructors, Inc. in the total amount of $1,827,136.00. See page "EE" (41) DISTRICT 7 Other uuiness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (42) DISTRICT 7 Con�eration of motion to adjourn -17- MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT �- County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8427. 10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County, California Fountain Valley, CA 9272&Bi27 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 JOINT BOARDS MEETING DATE July 17, 1991 at 7:30 P.m. The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting. ALL DISTRICTS 7 and 8: ELECTION OF JOINT CHAIRMAN AND VICE JOINT CHAIRMAN As provided in the Joint Boards' Rules of Procedures, nominations for Joint Chairman were made at the regular June meeting and the election takes place at the July regular meeting. Vice Joint Chairman William D. Mahoney has been nominated for the post of Joint Chairman. Enclosed with the supporting agenda material is a statement submitted by Joint Chairman nominee Mahoney. Nominations and election of the Vice Joint Chairman will be conducted immediately following the election of the Joint Chairman. _ For the Directors information, we have included below an excerpt from the current Rules of Procedures for meetings relative to the election of the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. "Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organiza ion. "A Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization shall be elected by a majority vote of the Districts at the regular meeting in July of each year. The nominations for Joint Chairman shall be made at a regular Board meeting in June each year . . . . "The nominations for Vice Joint Chairman shall be made at the regular Board Meeting in July each year and shall be made immediately following the election of the Joint Chairman. July 17, 1991 "The Chairman and Vice Chairman shall serve at the pleasure of a majority of the Districts. In the event the office of Vice Chairman becomes vacant due to resignation or retirement of the incumbent prior to the expiration of the regular term, the Vice Chairman shall succeed to the office of the Chairman and shall continue to serve through the remainder of the regular term unless sooner removed by action of a majority of the Districts. In the event the office of Vice Chairman becomes vacant prior to the expiration of the regular term, nominations and the election of a Director to serve in that capacity shall be conducted at the next regular Board meeting. The person so elected shall serve the balance of the regularly-scheduled term unless sooner removed as a result of action by a majority of the Districts." 11(a) AUTHORIZING APPLICATIONS FOR FEDERAL GRANTSKOANS FOR 1991-92 JOINT WORKS IMPROVEMENTS AND ADDITIONS. The routine annual action appearing in the agenda adopts resolutions for each of the Districts authorizing execution and filing of all documents necessary for state and federal construction grant and/or loan applications for 1991-92. 11(b) : AUTHORIZING PAYMENT OF SCAOMD FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 The California Clean Air Act authorizes the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) to assess and collect fees from public agencies for permit evaluation, annual operation permits, emissions, source testing and other applicable fees. While we do not expect an increase of CSDOC emissions fees, other fees may increase due to new SCAQMD regulations. The estimated maximum fees payable in fiscal year 1991-92 are as follows: Fee Amount Annual Emissions $ 95,000 Annual Operations Permit and Permit Evaluation 75,000 Nonattainment Pollutants, Precursors and Toxics 25,000 Source Testing 63,000 Miscellaneous 60,000 Total $ 318,000 Staff is requesting authorization to issue a blanket purchase order to SCAQMD, and to pay all applicable fees for the 1991-92 fiscal year in compliance with SCAQMD rules and regulations. -2- July 17, 1991 11(c) : AUTHORIZING PURCHASE OF SBE-9CTD WITH PAR SENSOR AND FLUOROMETER MARINE MONITORING INSTRUMENT PACKAGE, SPECIFICATION NO. E-201. The Laboratory Division is responsible for performing analyses of air, wastewater, and sludge, as well as certain ocean monitoring tasks in support of the various activities of the Districts. The water quality analyses of the Marine Monitoring Program are required to 1) ensure the protection of human health and the marine environment, 2) determine compliance with the 301(h)-modified National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit terms and conditions, and 3) document the effects of the wastewater discharge on receiving waters to assure protection of the beneficial use of these resources. In order to meet the NPDES permit requirements and the criteria of the California Ocean Plan, water quality samples are analyzed from 9 offshore stations monthly and 17 offshore stations quarterly. A number of these analyses are performed using a sophisticated continuously recording CTD instrument that is lowered from a boat and measures conductivity, temperature, depth (CTD); dissolved oxygen, pH, and light transmissivity. This data is essential for analyzing the effects of the wastewater plume on the ocean environment. To further enhance the Districts' ability to accurately track the plume, a photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) sensor and a fluorometer are also required. They provide the ability to monitor ambient light levels and chlorophyll-a at various depths in the water column to measure photosynthetic productivity. The Districts existing CTD is not equipped with either the PAR sensor or the fluorometer. This limits the Districts' ability to track the plume. Additionally, the existing CTD profiling unit must be serviced and calibrated by the manufacturer semi-annually. As a result, the sole CTD is not available for use approximately eight weeks out of the year. This creates a logistics problem in meeting monitoring requirements and was noted by EPA's contract auditors as a point of concern during their last audit of our program. The needed instrumentation is manufactured by Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc. and is the standard for marine monitoring. Sea-Bird is used by the City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts and the South California Coastal Water Research Project Authority. Staff therefore recommends the Purchase of a SBE-9 CTD with PAR Sensor and a Fluorometer, Specification No. E-201, from Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc. , for a total price of $54,440.00 plus tax and freight. 11(d) : RECEIVE AND FILE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING RE WASTEWATER DUALITY. DIVERSION AND TREATMENT STUDY. At the April 10, 1991 regular Board meeting, the Directors authorized the Selection Committee to solicit proposals for a wastewater quality, diversion and treatment study. �..� -3- July 17, 1991 In 1972, the Districts entered into agreements with the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) for the purpose of helping protect the underground fresh water quality in the Santa Ana River Basin. The agreements were based on mutual benefits to the upper basin (Riverside and San Bernardino Counties) and the lower basin (Orange County) water entities. One of the agreements, the "Wastewater Interceptor Capacity Agreement', provided for capacity rights in a trunk sewer known as the Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI) . The line extends from the Districts' Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley to the Orange County line. The line was built to bypass upper basin brines to the Fountain Valley Reclamation plant to protect the valuable Santa Ana River/Orange County underground water basins from extensive salt buildup. The SARI line serves portions of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 7 and 13 as well as removing non-reclaimable saline wastes from the Upper Basin. SAWPA owns SARI capacity totaling 30 mgd, and currently discharges about 8 mgd. The SARI line currently delivers about 30 mgd to Reclamation Plant No. 1. SARI capacity ranges from 30 mgd at the Riverside County line to 200 mgd at Reclamation Plant No. 1. The entire flow is currently being diverted from the Districts' Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley and is being treated at Plant No. 2 located in Huntington Beach. The quality of water discharged by the Upper Basin is regulated by SAWPA's industrial waste ordinance, which includes the provisions of the Districts industrial waste control ordinance and permits issued to SAWPA by the Districts. This influent includes discharge from several industrial sources and pretreated wastewater from the Stringfellow Waste Disposal Site located in Riverside County. Although permitted for 187,000 gallons per day, the actual \/ Stringfellow discharge has generally ranged from 15,000 to 35,000 gallons per day. The Stringfellow treatment plant is continually producing an effluent that far exceeds the removal expectations for heavy metals and organics and, in fact, almost meets California's drinking water standards. The discharge consistently meets the Districts' permit conditions. Nonetheless, the Boards have directed that the SARI flow be routed to plant No. 2. SARI discharge has heretofore always been planned for treatment at the Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant. Continued diversion of the SARI to Plant No. 2 could severely impair our operational flexibility in the future. However, planned or existing upper basin groundwater improvement projects, including the Arlington Desalter, are increasing the dissolved mineral content (salt) of the wastewater in the SARI line. Excessive dissolved minerals would lower the value of Plant No. 1 effluent for water reclamation. Staff, therefore, has proposed a study to review the present and anticipated future quality of the SARI wastewater, compare it to other trunklines, evaluate current trunkline diversion and water reclamation strategies, and recommend future trunkline diversion strategies. The goal would be to ensure a high quality Plant No. 1 effluent for reclamation and maximum flexibility in operating and managing the Districts' sewerage system. -4- July 17, 1991 Proposals were solicited from four firms and the Selection Committee has negotiated a professional services agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation to prepare the Project Study Report for an amount not to exceed $88,055.00, based on hourly rates plus overhead, plus direct expenses and fixed profit. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and adoption of a resolution approving the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the supporting agenda documents. 11(e) : RECEIVE AND FILE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND APPROVE ADDENDUM NO. 4 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION RE CENTRAL LABORATORY. JOB NO. J-17. In August 1986, the Directors approved a professional services agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design and construction support services for the new Central Laboratory. The agreement provides for, among other items, the services of a resident engineer to assist the Districts' construction management staff with the construction phase of the laboratory. Because of the delay in the completion of the laboratory, staff is recommending that Boyle Engineering Corporation's agreement be amended to provide additional resident engineer services through November 1991. The Selection Committee has negotiated Addendum No. 4 as follows: Proposed Existing Proposed Amended Agreement Addn. No. 4 Agreement Engineering services, including direct labor plus overhead at 155.5%, not to exceed $370,909 $ 0 $370,909 Direct expenses, not to exceed 5,000 0 5,000 Subconsultants Fees, not to exceed 12,750 0 12,750 Fixed profit 52,084 0 52,084 $440,743 0 $440,743 Resident Project Representative, (hourly rate including labor, overhead and profit) , at $80/hr., not to exceed $200,960 $51,200 $252,160 Totals $641,703 $51,200 $692,903 -5- July 17, 1991 The action appearing on the agenda is to approve the Selection Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above additional services and adoption of a resolution approving Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation. A copy of the Selection Committee certification and resolution are attached with the agenda supporting documents. 11(f) : RECEIVE AND FILE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND APPROVE ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS COMPANY FOR INSTRUMENTATION DESIGN AND INSPECTION SERVICES. The Directors have previously authorized the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate professional services agreements for specialty consulting services necessary to assist in the construction management of various master-planned projects. Under that authority, several consultants have been retained, individually or through firms, to assist Districts' staff in the management and inspection of the largest construction effort in the Districts' history. The Districts currently have projects totalling some $250 million under construction at the Joint Treatment Works and in the individual District's collection systems. Staff is attempting to recruit, train and develop increased dependability for this type of support "in house". However, the Districts' construction management staff resources are not yet sufficient to provide the specialized engineering and construction inspection services concerning instrumentation/process control systems. Instrumentation/process control systems are included in nearly all of the various master-planned construction projects. For the last two years the principal of The Project Solutions Company, Mr. Peter Wolfson, has provided full time instrumentation/process control support. The Selection Committee has negotiated an extension to the agreement with The Project Solutions Company, on an as-needed basis, for up to a three-year period beginning September 1, 1991, at hourly rates as follows plus direct expenses at cost for out-of-town travel : Agreement Period Hourly Rate First Year - 91/92 $59.00 Second Year - 92/93 $62.00 Third Year - 93/94 $65.00 The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for said additional work, and adoption of a resolution approving Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with The Project Solutions Company. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the supporting agenda documents. -6- `/ July 17, 1991 ..i 11(g) : RECEIVE AND FILE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND APPROVE PURCHASE ORDER CONTRACTS FOR SOILS. CONCRETE AND MATERIALS TESTING SERVICES FOR VARIOUS COLLECTION SYSTEM AND TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS, SPECIFICATION NO. 5-055. Soils, concrete and materials testing services for Districts' construction projects have most recently been provided by the private sector and, in the past, the County of Orange. Necessary services include testing of soils, concrete and asphalt; specialty testing including offsite inspection for pipe, fiberglass and other structures; and the testing of specialty material and non-ferrous materials. The Directors have previously authorized multiple soils, concrete and materials testing services contracts, all of which expired in June. Because of the large volume of collection system and treatment plant work, in May the Selection Committee was authorized to negotiate several contracts for construction materials testing on various projects. Three-year contracts with several firms, with an escalation factor, are recommended to provide materials testing services primarily consisting of soils, concrete and materials testing. Agreements with multiple firms is recommended because a firm is not always available due to either their workload or the Districts' immediate needs. It is estimated that the Districts will require approximately 5500 hours per year of crew time at an estimated cost of $40.00 per hour plus various laboratory analysis and testing services necessary for preparing test results and reports; thus, the cost would be approximately $300,000.00 annually. Seven firms submitted proposals. The Selection Committee reviewed the proposals and recommends that four purchase order contracts be issued as follows: Annual Type and Location Amount Firm of Work Not to Exceed Converse Consultants Soils and Concrete- Plants and Collection System $ 50,000 Professional Services Soils and Concrete- Industries, Inc. Collection System 50,000 Twining Labs of Full Service-Plants Southern California and Collection System 100,000 Smith-Emery Company Full Service-Plants 100,000 The Selection Committee recommends that purchase order contracts be issued to the above firms based on the terms, conditions and testing/service fees set forth in their respectful proposals in the not-to-exceed annual amounts indicated above for Soils, Concrete and Other Materials Testing Services for Various Collection System and Treatment Plant Projects, Specification No. S-055. -7- July 17, 1991 The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee certification of the fees for said services and authorization to issue purchase order contracts. A copy of the certification is attached with the supporting agenda documents. 11(h) : APPROVING FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL TRUST AGREEMENT TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1990-92 SERIES A $100 MILLION CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION Last December each of the Districts conducted their first borrowing to partially finance the facilities improvements and expansion projects set forth in the Districts 30-Year Wastewater Management Master Plan "2020 VISION". The Capital Improvement Program 1990-92 Series A Certificates of Participation borrowing was a variable rate issue of Certificates of Participation in the amount of $100 million. The Depository Trust Company (DTC), which acts as securities depository for the Certificates, has asked for an amendment to the agreement with the trustee, Texas Commerce Bank National Association, in order to provide that the record date for the certificates, while in the Daily Mode, be changed to the last day of the month. DTC desires that all certificates that they hold in the Daily Mode use the last day of the month as their record date. The Resolution and First Supplmental Trust Agreement have been reviewed by the Districts' staff and financing team, as well as Texas Commerce Bank, the Trustee, and National Westminster Bank, the Letter of Credit Bank. Once approved, this Resolution will take effect immediately. There are no costs associated with the change; it is only a record keeping convenience. Staff recommends approval of a resolution for each District authorizing the execution and delivery of the first supplemental trust agreement, and authorization for the chairman of each District and the Board Secretary to execute the agreement. 11(i) : AUTHORIZING EMPLOYMENT OF SAFETY AND HEALTH MANAGER ABOVE MID-POINT OF SALARY RANGE The Districts' Personnel Department began actively recruiting for a Safety and Health Manager in the fall of 1990 to enhance our Safety Program administration and effectiveness, and to bring that program in full compliance with the requirements of SB 198. Under that legislation, which became effective July 1, 1991, the Districts are required to: 1. Establish, implement and maintain a written Injury and Illness Prevention Program complying with numerous provisions covering an array of activities; 2. Provide health and safety training programs designed to provide employees with both general and specific instruction regarding safe and healthy work practices; -8- \/ July 17, 1991 3. Proactively communicate safety matters with employees and encourage employees to report workplace hazards; 4. Perform workplace safety and health inspections and meet specific reporting and documentation requirements. SB 198 provides for civil and criminal liability for failure to meet the requirements of the Act. The Districts have had an excellent Safety Program for many years. However, the additional demands placed upon us by this and other recent legislation, including requirements relating to the development and expansion of our laboratory related activities and our continuing priority for maintaining a safe and healthy place of employment for both our employees and the community we serve, has placed a new emphasis on our capability in the safety and health arena. In order to fully meet this challenge, the Districts need to hire a safety and health professional with extensive expertise, advanced formal education in a wide range of safety related subjects and State Certification in multiple areas. Our selection process involved the consideration of over 100 potential candidates in two rounds. The first round failed to produce an acceptable candidate and the position was readvertised. Each of the candidates who met all of the selection criteria required a �.i salary at or near the top of the existing range. We have selected the top candidate who is currently employed in a private sector and earning a salary and total compensation package in excess of the amount staff is authorized to offer (mid-point of the salary range which is currently $4342 - $5645 per month), and in fact beyond the top of that range. The candidate, however, has expressed a desire to accept this position with the Districts. Staff is therefore requesting authorization to negotiate a salary and employ the candidate at a salary above the mid-point of the salary range for the position of Safety and Health Manager. 11(j) : AUTHORIZING EMPLOYMENT OF AIR QUALITY CONTROL MANAGER ABOVE MID-POINT OF SALARY RANGE As the Directors are well aware, air quality laws and regulations are changing rapidly at the federal , state and regional level . Passage of the new federal Clean Air Act occurred in 1990. The California State Legislature and the California Air Resources Board are bringing new air quality requirements to bear on a statewide basis. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) enacted this region's air quality management plan in 1989 and is currently drafting revisions to the plan. All of these developing issues are having an increasingly larger demand on Sanitation Districts' staff time in responding to and coordinating our efforts for complying with the growing number of regulations and the increasingly stricter requirements. -9- July 17, 1991 For this reason, an Air Quality Management Division was authorized by the Boards in July 1990. Since late last year we have recruited for our Air Quality Control Manager who will have the responsibility of maintaining day-to-day supervisory oversight of the various activities of the Division, as well as providing focused response to emerging federal , state and regional laws and regulations. This position will provide the leadership necessary for the Sanitation Districts to achieve 100 percent compliance with all applicable air regulations (which is consistent with our 30-year Master Plan entitled "2020 VISION", which establishes consistent compliance with all environmental regulations as one of its key objectives) . Staff has successfully recruited an individual who has the managerial , technical and communication skills necessary to lead this new and critically important Division. Currently employed by the California State University Chancellor's Office, the candidate has overall programmatic responsibility for all of the environmental compliance programs for the CSU system's twenty campuses. This includes staff management, budgeting, long-range planning, tracking state and federal regulations and developing environmental policy for the Chancellor's Office. Holding a M.S. and B.S. in environmental engineering and previously employed by TRW in their wastewater management program, the candidate has a practical and statewide perspective on environmental issues. The candidate currently earns more than staff is authorized to offer which is the mid-point of the salary range (currently $4342 - $5645/month) for this position. Therefore, staff is requesting authorization to negotiate a salary and employ this individual at a salary above the mid-point of salary range for the District Air Quality Manager classification. DISTRICTS 2. 3. 5. 7 8 11 (ONLY) I1(k) : REVISIONS TO ANNEXATION POLICY RESOLUTIONS The Boards of Directors of Districts 2, 3, 5, 7 and 11 last revised their resolutions establishing procedures and policies concerning annexations to the District in 1982. Districts 1 and 6 have no adjacent properties which are not a part of another District. Districts 13 and 14 were formed later, incorporating their ultimate service areas. The Districts' General Counsel has advised that legislative changes and judicial decisions require that the annexation policy resolutions be amended to incorporate findings justifying the fees. The basis of the findings is the comprehensive 30-year Master Plan of Capital Facilities contained in "2020 VISION". This plan includes detailed financial and engineering reports identifying the required future development of the Districts and projections for providing sewerage service to all properties within each District's service area. The action on the agenda is to adopt separate, new resolutions for Districts 2, 3, 5, 7 and 11 which repeal the 1982 resolutions, includes the "2020 VISION" findings, declares exemption from CEQA, reaffirms the existing policies and procedures, and establishes the current rate of fees as follows: -10- July 17, 1991 Acreage Fee W/Tax W/O Tax District Exchange Exchange 2 $2,922 $3,508 3 3,154 4,139 5 3,054 4,084 7 2,902 3,883 11 4,843 5,830 DISTRICT 2 11(1) : RECEIVE AND FILE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WILLDAN ASSOCIATES FOR PREPARATION OF PROJECT REPORT RE SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-31. The Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI) was constructed between 1972 and 1976, extending from the Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant to the Orange County boundary, located just south of Prado Dam. The line increases in size from 39 inches at the County boundary to 84 inches where it enters the treatment plant. In 1986, an amendment to the County Sanitation District No. 2 master plan found the SARI line would have future deficiencies between the Riverside Freeway crossing at Grove Street northeasterly to about the mid-point of Yorba Regional Park within La Palma Avenue, all within the City of Anaheim. Both the 1986 amendment and the 1989 Master Plan recommend a parallel sewer over this 4-mile reach. There are a considerable number of development proposals ongoing just northeast of this area, generally in the area bounded by La Palma Avenue on the south, Weir Canyon Road on the northeast and property owned by the County of Orange and the City of Anaheim. Within this area the SARI line is quite deep, in fact, it is over 30 feet deep. Because La Palma Avenue was routed to its present intersection with Weir Canyon utilizing an alignment requiring high fills, the land which sits northwesterly of La Palma Avenue will require additional fill in order to be developed. Staff has reviewed various proposals which could require fills over the SARI line and its manholes that would place the SARI some 50 feet deep in this location. This is clearly unacceptable for safety reasons. Staff, therefore, believes that it would be in the District's best interest to prepare a project report on the Santa Ana River Interceptor which would include recommendations for the areas found hydraulically deficient as well as the deep portions around La Palma Avenue and Weir Canyon Road. The project report will provide a planning tool for use in future decisions. Because Willdan Associates is very familiar with the SARI project, having done earlier master plan reports for Sanitation District No. 2, and through extensive work with the City of Anaheim, the Selection Committee was -11- July 17, 1991 authorized by the Board to solicit a proposal and negotiate a professional services agreement for the preparation of the project report on Santa Ana River Interceptor Relief Sewer, Contract No. 2-31. The Selection Committee has negotiated a professional services agreement with Willdan Associates to prepare the Project Report for an amount not to exceed $56,700.00, based on hourly rates plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants fees, and fixed profit. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee's certification of the final negoitated fee for the above work and adoption of a resolution approving the Professional Services Agreement with Willdan Associates. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the supporting agenda documents. 11(m) : APPROVE TAX PASS-THROUGH AGREEMENT WITH THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS AND THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS Use of tax increment financing by Redevelopment Agencies to generate revenues for redevelopment projects freezes the District's (as well as the other taxing agencies') ad valorem tax revenues. The incremental tax revenues are then used by the Redevelopment Agency to service the debt incurred to finance the project. However, the redevelopment activities within each project area generally result in additional flow to the Districts' sewerage facilities, thus increasing the cost of sewerage service but without an attendant increase in Sanitation Districts' revenue to pay said costs. To address this problem, the Boards of Directors have previously adopted a policy of negotiating with Redevelopment Agencies for funding of Districts' services for redevelopment project areas, using a priority ranking of alternatives. The action appearing on the agenda is the consideration of a resolution approving a pass-through agreement with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Alamitos and the City of Los Alamitos providing District No. 3 with 50 percent of its property tax revenues that would have historically been allocated to the District were it not for the Redevelopment Agency financing mechanism. This agreement is consistent with previously established Board policy. DISTRICTS 7 AND -14 11(n) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO BAKER FORCE MAINS. FROM MAIN STREET PUMP STATION TO BRISTOL STREET. CONTRACT NO. 14-1-2 This $5.7 million project is for the installation of a double-barrel sewer force main, gravity interceptor and appurtenances in Baker Street, Airway Avenue, Airport Loop Drive and airport parking lot easements from east of Bristol Street, under the 405 Freeway to the Main Street Pump Station. Change Order No. 2 adds two items of work and $8,074.00 to the contract. Item 1, in the amount of $3,374.00, provides for reconstruction of two existing lateral house connections in order to connect the laterals to a new -12- July 17, 1991 Costa Mesa Sanitary District sewer. The elevation of the new sewer line was �..�' higher than that of the existing laterals. Item 2, in the amount of $4,700.00, provides for the relocation of a concrete structure to avoid existing utilities that were not located as shown in the contract documents. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 for an addition of $8,074.00 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc. There is no time extension associated with this change order. ALL DISTRICTS 13: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE. The Executive Committee met on June 26, 1991. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on its deliberations and recommendations for consederation by the Boards. 14: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE RE 1991-92 WORKERS" COMPENSATION EXCESS INSURANCE COVERAGE. The Workers' compensation excess coverage (stop-loss) insurance policy expired on July 1, 1991. At last month's meeting, it was reported that because of the way the insurance marketplace works, quotations for the 1991-92 coverage were not received in time for consideration by the Boards at the regular June meeting. Inasmuch as the coverage was scheduled to expire between the Boards' June 12th and July 17th regular meetings, the Boards authorized the Fiscal Policy Committee to evaluate proposals obtained by the Districts' insurance broker and place appropriate excess workers' compensation coverage effective July 1, 1991. The authorization provided that the action taken by the Fiscal Policy Committee would be submitted to the Joint Boards for ratification or revision at the regular meeting on July 17th. This is similar to procedures followed by the Boards in past years. Enclosed with the agenda material is the Fiscal Policy Committee's recommendation and action in placing the Worker's Compensation excess coverage insurance effective July 1, 1991 for consideration by the Boards. The items appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the report and ratify the Committee's action. 15: REPORT OF THE BUILDING COMMITTEE. The Building Committee met on June 20, 1991. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on its deliberations. 16: APPROVE ADDENDA 1. 2. 3. 4. 5 AND 6 AND AWARD INTERPLANT PIPELINE AND UTILITY CORRIDOR. JOB NO. I-9. The construction of additional treatment capacity at Reclamation Plant No. 1 which is now underway, requires a new interplant effluent pipeline and utility piping to Plant No. 2 to convey treated effluent and serve anticipated interplant utility requirements. The Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, -13- July 17, 1991 Job No. I-9, will be constructed in an approximately 30-foot wide utility corridor owned by the Districts adjacent to the westerly levee of the Santa Ana River which now contains 42-inch, 66-inch and 84-inch effluent pipes plus a digester gas line and instrumentation cable. Besides the new 120-inch diameter interplant pipeline, the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan recommended construction of a new interplant digester gas transmission main, an industrial reclaimed water line and a fiber-optic communications cable. In January 1991, the Directors approved plans and specifications for this project. Bidding has been held in abeyance pending the sale of the Series B Certificates of Participation last April . (1) Addendum No. 1 Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications changed the bid date from April 16, 1991 to May 21, 1991, extended the term of the contract and reduced the amount of liquidated damages. The relaxed requirements were possible due to the unexpected availability of Southern California Edison property for construction staging which eliminated the critical coordination which had been needed with the Santa Ana River Mainstem Project. (2) Addendum No. 2 Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for this project eliminated certain permit requirements and details related to activities in the Santa Ana River Channel , added a box conduit alternative to the 120-inch pipe and miscellaneous technical details and clarifications. (3) Addendum No. 3 Addendum No. 3 to the plans and specifications changed the bid date to June 25, 1991 and revised requirements for shoring and added miscellaneous technical details. (4) Addendum No. 4 Addendum No. 4 to the plans and specifications included clarification of construction constraints and the addition of the Replacement of Portion of Standby Ocean Outfall , Job No. J-22-2. This work is necessary prior to construction of Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2, and includes about 950 feet of 120-inch standby outfall from the surge tower within Plant No. 2 to the south side of Talbert Channel in the new Huntington Beach wetlands. Replacement now avoids future conflict with the restoration of the Huntington Beach Wetlands by the Huntington Beach Coastal Wetlands Conservancy. It is economical to include this work with the interplant pipeline job because the pipe is the same size and type and it appears possible to complete the installation before the current wetlands -14- Jully 17, 1991 restoration is complete. p (Work within the wetlands is being coordinated with the Huntington Beach Wetlands Conservancy and environmental regulatory agencies to determine any necessary mitigation measures. The anticipated mitigation is expected to cost the Districts less than $100,000 for recontouring a portion of the wetlands.) The Directors will recall that in April 1991, authority was granted to negotiate this work as an amendment to a current contract with the State of California, Department of Transportation. That negotiation stalled because of permitting problems, as yet not fully resolved. The inclusion of this work appears to be supported by all agencies; however, the bid items for this work can be deleted at a later date in the event acceptable permits cannot be obtained. (5) Addendum No. 5 Addendum No. 5 to the plans and specifications changed the bid date to July 2, 1991, addressed possible sales tax increases and included minor corrections and clarifications. (6) Addendum No. 6 Addendum No. 6 to the plans and specifications added terms for Contractor's use of three leaseholds of nurseries on Southern California Edison property and modification of trench and backfill requirements. (7) Award of Job No. I-9 On July 2, 1991, 11 bids were received for the Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9. The bids ranged from a high of $29,508,000.00, to a low of $21,328,600.00 submitted by Colich & Sons. A complete bid tabulation is attached to the agenda. Staff recommends approval of Addenda 1 through 6 and award to Colich & Sons, Gardena, for their low bid of $21,328,600.00. The engineer's estimate for this work was $30,000,000. 17: APPROVE ADDENDA NOS. 1 AND 2. DENY PROTEST AND AWARD PLANT NO. 1 CONTROL CENTER INSTRUMENTATION. JOB NO. J-23-2. AND REPLACEMENT OF COMPUTERIZED MONITORING SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-44. In March 1991, the Directors approved plans and specifications for two computerized treatment plant monitoring and control system projects, Job No. J-23-2 which will install a new system in the control center building currently under construction at Plant No. 1; and Job No. P2-44 which will replace an existing computerized monitoring system at Plant No. 2. Five manufacturers were prequalified to supply the equipment for these jobs by the Boards in August 1990. These systems will provide the Operations staff better access to information concerning the operation of the plants, produce historical data and have the ability to control all process equipment from the Operations Center at both �./ facilities. -15- July 17, 1991 The project at Plant 1 will install the necessary hardware, software and data highway in order to monitor process functions for both existing and future master-planned facilities. Ultimately the system will have the ability to provide distributed control for all plant functions from the Control Center/Operations and Maintenance Building, Job No. J-23-1, which is currently under construction. The project at Plant 2 will replace the existing computer monitoring system, which is of mid-1970 technology, with an identical system proposed for the Plant 1 facilities. The existing computer hardware is obsolete and trained service personnel are unavailable. (1) Addendum No. 1 Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications, includes delaying the bid date to May 21, 1991, adding a new, state mandated section to the Construction Agreement titled, "Resolution of Disputes", defining requirements for use of storage facilities for equipment and the clarification of miscellaneous technical details. (2) Addendum No. 2 Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications adds installation responsibilities by the preapproved equipment manufacturers to the project, and includes the upgrade of existing programmable logic \/ controllers to match new equipment, clarifies miscellaneous technical details, and adds an upgraded telephone wiring and fiber optic highway installation, and provides for a faster access to information in the new computer system. (3) Letters of Protest On May 21, 1991, four bids were received for the Plant 1 Control Center Instrumentation, Job No. J-23-2, and Replacement of Computerized Monitoring System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-44. Subsequent to the receipt of bids, the third low bidder, Sachs Electric Company filed a letter dated May 22, 1991 requesting that the low bidder, HSQ Technology, and second low bidder, JWP Controls, be disqualified and the award made to Sachs Electric. By letter dated June 4, 1991, Johnson Yokogawa Corporation, the highest of the four bidders, recommended that HSQ Technology be disqualified. Johnson Yokogawa and Sachs, as well as Sachs' supplier, Westinghouse Electric Company, allege that neither JWP Controls, nor HSQ Technology and their main supplier, Allen Bradley, meet the specifications; primarily with regard to requirements of the specification for the computer software program. Staff has determined that the bid of JWP Controls should be rejected because they have not complied with specifications. -16- July 17, 1991 The Districts have also received letters dated June 7 from HSQ Technology and June 6 from Allen Bradley stating that they can, and will, meet the requirements of the specifications. Staff, the General Counsel 's office and the Districts' design consulant, EMA, have reviewed the protest letters and the responses by the low bidder and can find no reason to recommend award to other than HSQ Technology, the low bidder. The staff report dated June 24, 1991, attached to the supporting agenda material , reviews this issue in more detail . (4) Award of Job Nos. J-23-2 and P2-44 The four bids received ranged from a high of $5,152,358.00 to a low of $3,752,000.00 submitted by HSQ Technology of South San Francisco, California. The second low bidder, JWP Controls, was non-responsive because they designated a data concentrator which had not been prequalified by the Directors. A complete bid tabulation is attached to the agenda. Staff recommends approval of Addenda 1 and 2, rejection of the bid of JWP Controls as not meeting the specifications, denial of the protests of Sachs Electric Company, Westinghouse Electric, and Johnson Yokogawa and award of Plant No. 1 Control Center Instrumentation, Job No. J-23-2 and Replacement of Conputerized Monitoring System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-44 to HSQ Technology for their low bid amount of $3,752,000.00. The engineer's estimate for this work was $6,000,000.00. v 18: CONTRACT BOAT SERVICES FOR OCEAN MONITORING AND SPECIAL STUDIES. Enclosed with the supporting agenda material is a separate staff report recommending award of contracts for MARINE MONITORING VESSEL FOR WATER QUALITY SURVEYING, SPECIFICATION NO. 5-053 (REVISED) , AND MARINE MONITORING VESSEL FOR COASTAL WATERS, SPECIFICATION NO. 5-054 (REVISED) . 19: AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AGREEMENTS WITH THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY TO PROCURE NATURAL GAS. To fully utilize the new Central Generation Facilities located at both Plant Nos. 1 and 2, the Districts will , in the initial years, need to purchase natural gas from the local utility, Southern California Gas Company. To do this, the Districts must enter into two agreements, one for each plant, with the utility company to purchase the necessary natural gas at a cogeneration rate, approximately one-half the rate charged most other users. The standard cogeneration rates are controlled by the California Public Utilities Commission and are subject to their terms. The agreements with the gas company will ensure that the Districts receive the best rates possible which will be in effect for a two-year period. After this period, new agreements will be signed by the Districts with the gas company and rates will be adjusted at that time. ..i -17- July 17, 1991 Staff recommends that the Boards authorize the General Manager to enter into agreements, in a form approved by General Counsel , with the Southern California Gas Company to procure gas for use in the Central Generation Facilities and for general plant use. 20: AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN THE JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT CREATING THE NATIONAL WATER RESEARCH INSTITUTE. As has been widely reported in the press, Joan Irvine Smith has aproached several water agencies in Orange County with an offer to fund water-related projects that would benefit Orange County's water resources. Mrs. Smith is particularly interested in funding innovative programs that will have an ongoing benefit such as desalinization, water reclamation and toxic waste management. Mrs. Smith has proposed a joint powers agreement to create an institute with the stated purpose of undertaking research, development and implementation of public water projects for the purpose of developing and conserving water and improving the quality of water, preventing or remediating degradation of water quality and efficiently using water resources in Orange County. Because such work may be of additional value on a regional , statewide and national level , the organization will be called the National Water Research Institute. The proposed Institute was previouly discussed with the Executive Committee and the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee and staff was directed to participate in its formation. Research is a major element of the Districts' 30-year Wastewater Management Action Plan, "2020 VISION" and participation in the Institute would be consistent with the Action Plan. Mrs. Smith's attorneys have prepared a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Creating the National Water Research Institute. The participating members are now the County Sanitation Districts, the Irvine Ranch Water District, the Municipal Water District of Orange County, the Orange County Water District and the San Juan Basin Authority. The bylaws to be adopted by the Institute's board of directors have also been drafted. Basically, the administrative costs of the Institute, estimated initially to be $250,000 per year, would be shared equally by the participating districts. Thus, the Sanitation Districts' share would be $50,000 per year. In addition, projects would be identified by the Institute and funded from a number of sources. Funding would not be limited to that provided by Mrs. Smith. Other sources would include both private and public (local , state and federal agencies), entities including the participating districts who may elect to provide funds for a project of particular interest to that district. Such project funding would be on a project-specifiec basis. Staff recommends that the Boards adopt the resolution included with the supporting agenda material approving participation in the Institute by the Districts and authorizing and directing the Joint Chairman to appoint the Districts' representative and alternates to the Institute's Board. 21: AGENDA FOR CLOSED SESSION. From time to time it is necessary for the Boards to convene in closed `/ -18- July 17, 1991 session to consider purchase and sale of real property, potential or pending \./ litigation, personnel matters or other matters which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act. In order to avoid a situation where a closed session is needed but does not appear on the agenda, this standing item is placed on the agenda each month providing for a closed session at the regular meeting, if deemed necessary by the Boards. DISTRICTS 1 AND 2 35: ACTIONS RELATIVE TO AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 1989 COLLECTION TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES MASTER PLAN AND SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 TO 1989 PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT RE MEMORY LANE INTERCEPTOR. CONTRACT NO. 2-30. The 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, as well as the earlier 1986 District No. 2 Master Plan, identified the need to parallel the Orange Subtrunk, extending from the Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI), easterly under the Santa Ana River and the Santa Ana Freeway in La Veta Avenue to the intersection of Flower Street, at an estimated cost of $330,000 (1989 dollars) . Since the master plan was completed, and particularly in the last year, newly planned large developments in both the City of Orange and the City of Santa Ana have been identified which will necessitate the construction of a larger parallel line than originally envisioned and possibly extending it east of the previously planned terminus at Flower Street. The estimated cost today would be about $800,000. The large developments include major office complexes in the Cities of Santa Ana and Orange adjacent to Main Place, and large developments both north and south of La Veta Avenue in the City of Orange. Staff has investigated the regional sewering responsibilities with the Cities of Orange and Santa Ana and all agree that a realigned joint project would best serve the needs of both cities under a negotiated cost-sharing agreement. Sanitation District No. 2 operates the Orange Subtrunk in La Veta Avenue, discussed above. That subtrunk was to have been paralleled to serve identified needs northerly of La Veta Avenue. Southerly of La Veta Avenue, primarily within the City of Santa Ana, the District operates trunk sewers in Bristol Street and Main Street which drain from north to south. Those sewers are identified as having adequate capacity to serve identified projects in Santa Ana. However, in both cities the proposed development is now substantially larger than previously anticipated. Within Santa Ana, projects include an expansion of the Bekins office building, Fidelity Federal property, a large expansion of Main Place and within the Town and Country area and Main Street Concourse. Those expansions may range to nearly 10 million square feet, including over 1200 hotel rooms. Additional large expansions are planned in Orange, both north and south of La Veta Avenue. Staff believes that while the Bristol Street and Main Street sewers, previously calculated to have adequate capacity, could still serve District No. 1 needs in the forseeable future, that capacity might be better saved for projects in the center of the City of Santa Ana to preclude the necessity of future paralleling lines in those major streets. -19- July 17, 1991 The staffs of the cities and the Districts, together with Boyle Engineering Corporation (retained under a Districts purchase order for a preliminary engineering survey) have identified an alternative to constructing the Orange Subtrunk relief and various major sewer construction projects in both the cities. That project would be the Memory Lane Interceptor at a cost of about $4.1 million dollars. The project would begin at the SARI line, extend easterly under the Santa Ana River and in Memory Lane to Parker Street and north in Parker Street to La Veta Avenue. The final terminus would be the intersec- tion of Batavia Street and La Veta Avenue where major City of Orange sewers would be intercepted, thereby eliminating the need to build sewers paralleling the Orange Subtrunk and city sewers in La Veta Avenue as well as planned City of Santa Ana sewers which would deliver water to the Districts' trunks in Main Street and Bristol Street. Staff has estimated that the cost of the Orange Subtrunk paralleling would be approximately $800,000. The staff of the City of Orange has estimated that their sewer needs would total close to $1 million, while Santa Ana sewer needs may range to $2.3 million. The estimated cost of the Memory Lane Interceptor is equivalent to the cost of other sewering alternatives. However, the benefit to the Districts would be the preservation of existing capacity in Districts' trunk sewers for future needs. In informal discussions with the staffs of the Cities, Santa Ana is expected to contribute $1.3 million with the City of Orange contributing $700,000. The remaining $2.1 million would be shared approximately equally between Districts 1 and 2. A draft cost-sharing agreement is under review by General Counsel , staff and staffs of the Cities. Items requiring action by the Directors at this time to effect these proposed changes are as follows: (1) Receive and file Project Report prepared by Boyle Engineering Corporation. (2) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated June 20, 1991 re Supplement No. 2 to 1989 Programmatic Environmental Impact Report for said project. (3) Consideration of motion to receive and file Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment relative to said Contract No. 2-30, finding that said project could have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, Supplement No. 2 to the Program Environmental Impact Report will be required; and authorizing preparation of said EIR supplement. Further, at the April Board Meeting, the Directors authorized the selection committee to negotiate a professional services agreement with Boyle -20- July 17, 1991 Engineering Corporation for preparation of Supplement No. 2 to 1989 Program Environmental Impact Report on Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan and planning, design and construction support services for Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30: The committee has negotiated an agreement for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $223,330.00. The actions appearing on the agenda for the Selection Committee are to receive and file the committee's cerfification of the final negotiated fee and adoption of a resolution approving the professional services agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation. Copies of the Project Report, Staff Report, Initial Study, Selection Committee certification and resolution are attached with the supporting agenda documents. DISTRICT 7 40: APPROVE ADDENDA 1. 2. 3 AND 4 AND AWARD RELOCATION OF MICHELSON PUMP STATION. CONTRACT NO. 7-11-2. In March 1991, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for the Relocation of the Michelson Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-2. This project ... includes the construction of a new, replacement pump station which will provide sewer service for "Park Place", the large development planned for the former Fluor site, and adjacent properties. (1) Addendum No. 1 Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications states that subsection references contained within these specifications that differ from the Districts' 1991 General Provisions, Standard Specifications and Standard Drawings are superceded by the applicable sections and subsections of the 1991 edition. (2) Addendum No. 2 Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for this project adds a short section of influent gravity sewer from Carlson Avenue to the new pump station and the abandonment of the existing pump station and appurtenant facilities. (3) Addendum No. 3 Addendum No. 3 to the plans and specifications includes adjustments to the Schedule of Prices and a statement that bids items will be based on a 6.5% sales tax. In the event the sales tax is raised, a change order -21- July 17, 1991 will be issued for additional cost. The addendum also adds the City of Irvine's Standard Conditions referred to in Encroachment Permit No. 3941 MC,; and changes the bid receipt date to June 25, 1991. (4) Addendum No. 4 Addendum No. 4 to the plans and specifications clarifies traffic control and working hour requirements contained in Section 113 of the Detailed Specifications. On June 25, 1991, eleven bids were received for Relocation of Michelson Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-2. The bids ranged from a high of $2,350,000.00, to a low of $1,827,136.00, submitted by Mitchell Pacific Constructors, Inc. A complete bid tabulation is attached to the supporting agenda material . Staff recommends award to Mitchell Pacific Constructors, Inc. for their low bid amount of $1,827,136.00. The engineer's estimate for Contract No. 7-11-2 is $3,000,000. -22- RE AGENDA 17M ry0 7 CIVIC CENTER P.O. BOX 337 T 201 E. LA HABRA BLVD. TA HABRA CA CITY a LA HABRA, CALIFORNIA90 90633-0337 �" C FTY Of 12131 905-9]00 July 8, 1991 TO: Members of the Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County I would like to thank you for your expression of confidence and trust by nominating me to serve as your Joint Chairman for the upcoming year. Please be assured that if elected as Joint Chairman, I will do my utmost to give the quality of representation and service which we have been fortunate to have had in our past Joint Chairmen. Following are some of the opportunities and challenges facing CSDOC in the future: .-� NPDES Permit Renewal This item is without question a top priority for CSDOC. We will not only continue to press the EPA for a favorable decision in regards to our 301H waiver, but will also continue our ongoing and aggressive efforts toward educating the public and our legislators in regards to the commitment of CSDOC in protecting the public and the environment. 2020 Vision Implementation We are really just beginning to implement "2020 VISION", whose key elements are ongoing. They include, but are not limited to, ocean protection; focused ocean protection and balanced cross- media environmental protection; aggressive toxics control; 100% sludge reuse; additional water reclamation; water conservation; consistent regulatory compliance; energy conservation; research to strive for improvement; expansion of public education activities; wastewater facilities improvements and expansions, including reliability; and funding. Funding Next year, we anticipate the need for a $100 million ± Series "C" COP issue, at which time we will need to consider a reserve policy. The study of a fee structure for both the community and the user will be completed, which fee structure will more equitably allocate the cost of sewerage service. Source Control Ordinance Based upon changing federal requirements, the Boards will be required to revise the uniform ...i industrial waste ordinance for controlling toxics at the source. The ordinance also addresses increased emphasis on waste minimization and safe material substitution. Air Quality Dealing with air quality issues has really replaced sludge disposal as our major challenge. With the formation of a new air quality division in our Technical Services Department, we will be better equipped to address this challenge. A manager for the division has been recruited, and with Board approval the staffing of that division should be complete in the first quarter of the fiscal year. Sludge Management Long-term sludge management continues to be a major issue. Hopefully work will be completed on a Phase II of the sludge management plan for the Boards' consideration. Water Reclamation We hope to be able to acquire a site, or sites, for water reclamation facilities and complete arrangements with the Orange County Water District for joint projects. Laboratory/Research We expect to have completed around January, 1992, a new 36,000 square-foot, state-of-the-art laboratory, which will significantly enhance our monitoring and research work which enables us to assure that we are protecting the public's health and the environment. We anticipate to become national leaders in these activities, as we are in so many others. Facilitating Legislative and Regulatory Matters Because of our past success rate, we have assumed the role of facilitator of federal, state, regional and local legislators, regulators and program operators, to work toward the concept of total environmental management. Cross-media issues are taken into consideration in establishing environmental standards to avoid conflicting laws and regulations. Computer Automation With the Boards' adoption in June of a computer automation master plan, we will make major strides toward upgrading our computer capabilities in terms of treatment plant operations, and scientific, engineering and business computer automation. In closing, may I express my appreciation at having been afforded the opportunity of serving as your Vice Joint Chairman over the past two years. I would consider it an honor to act as Joint Chairman in the upcoming year, and hope that you will consider me on July 17, 1991. Sinceerrely' ( � Will am D. Mahoney Councilmember WDM/kmg RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 13 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS AI ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA June 26, 1991 10844 ELLI6 AVENUE PU BOX BRJ 2VN,AIN VALLE..CAL609NIA W726�9127 1]14196b]411 REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Meeting Date: June 26, 1991 - 5: p.m. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Present: Director Charles E. Sylvia Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel A. B. Catlin Joint Chairman William Mahoney Vice Joint Chairman Don R. Griffin Past Joint Chairman STAFF PRESENT: Norman E. Culver Past Joint Chairman Dan Griset Chairman, District 1 J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Iry Pickler Chairman, District 2 Tan Dawes, Director of Engineering Sal A. Sapien Chairman, District 3 Gary Hasenstab, Director of Personnel Evelyn Hart Chairman, District 5 Gary Streed, Director of Finance James A. Wahner Chairman, District 6 Bob Ooten, Assistant Superintendent, Richard B. Edgar Chairman, District 7/Past JC Operations Peer A. Swan Chairman, District 14 Dan Dillon, Accounting Manager Don Roth County Supervisor Toni Hutto, Sr. Personnel Analyst Roger Stanton County Supervisor Absent: Grace Winchell Chairman, District 11 William D. Ehrle Chairman, District 13 1) 1991-92 Individual District Budget Recommendations. Summary of Budget and Fiscal Projections The Committee reviewed the staff's preliminary 1991-92 budget recommendations for the individual Districts which incorporate each District's share of the Joint Works operating and capital budgets approved by the Boards on June 12th. The budgets of the nine separate Districts, prepared pursuant to the adopted Financial Plan for the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, total $592.4 million. The total budget increase over the 1990-91 budget is $17.4 million, or 3%. Approximately 10% of the budgeted requirements is for operations, maintenance and replacement (0, M & R) and 6% for debt. Capital funds (including reserves) for construction of master planned sewerage facilities for both the individual Districts' collection systems and the joint treatment plants account for 62%, and authorized general and contingency reserves are nearly 22% of the total budget. Funding of the budget for 1991-92 is provided primarily by accumulated construction and other reserves, accounting for 58% of the total. In addition, taxes contribute 6%, fees (connection fees and user fees) 14%, and interest and �1 miscellaneous income 7%. Projected borrowing to partially fund the current and future capital requirements in accordance with the Master Plan will provide 15% of the total revenue for 1991-92. (1 of 5) Executive Committee Report June 26, 1991 Except for Districts 13 and 14, which receive no ad valorem taxes, the tax appropriations received pursuant to Proposition 13 by the other Districts are fully allocated to cover 0, M 8 R including debt service for Certificates of Participation (COPS). Districts 1, 2, 3, 59 6, 7 and 11 have adopted user fee programs to provide necessary supplemental financing of Districts' 0, M 8 R as the costs of wastewater treatment and disposal activities required by federal , state and local regulatory authorities have exceeded the ability of the ad valorem tax revenues to fund operations under Proposition 13 constraints. District No. 13 receives no appropriation from ad valorem taxes and is totally financed by fees. District No. 14 is financed by the Irvine Ranch Water District. The Districts presently treat 272 MGD of which 135 MGD (60 MGD now in service at Plant No. 1 and 75 MGD now in service at Plant No. 2) is secondary treatment. The budget projections assume renewal of the Districts' 301(h) Waiver NPDES Permit now being reviewed by the EPA and the RWQCB. Should full secondary treatment be required, the capital and 0, M 8 R costs would increase substantially. EPA and SWRCB have previously funded up to 87K of the cost of construction of advanced treatment facilities but Congress has eliminated the construction grant program and replaced it with a revolving loan program. Thus, virtually all future treatment plant improvements will be a local responsibility. The real long-term impact of federal and state requirements on Districts' fiscal planning will be on 0, M 8 R costs. While, as noted, EPA and SWRCB have funded a portion of constructing facilities for a higher degree of treatment in the past, the added ongoing operating costs have always been paid entirely by the local community. The Joint Operating budget approved June 12th increased by 5.1% for 1991-92, and two-thirds of that increase is attributed to regulatory mandates. Operating costs will continue to rise due to inflationary influences, rising flows, increased costs of sludge disposal and other regulatory requirements imposed by such organizations as the EPA, RWQCB and South Coast Air Quality Management District. Under full secondary treatment estimated costs would increase another $50 million annually (based on 1989 dollars). Capital financing for sewers and treatment and disposal facilities will be provided by accumulated construction reserves and interest earnings thereon, connection and capital replacement fees, sale of capacity rights, and, as discussed above, borrowing. User fees are also a potential source of funding a portion of capital needs for rehabilitation, replacement and treatment Improvements; and are a partial source of funds for debt repayment as well as 0, M 8 R. Staff also reviewed the 10-year fiscal projections and pointed out that the Districts' 0, M 8 R, capital and debt service needs over the next ten years total $3.0 billion. It is clear that the Districts will have to utilize a combination of increased user and connection fees and debt financing to maintain their fiscal integrity and to keep pace with the rising costs of sewage treatment and disposal and increasingly stringent public health and environmental protection standards. The proposed budgets indicate potential average annual user fee increases of $30-$15 per year for the next 10 years. (2 of 5) > Executive Committee Report June 26, 1991 �..i Adoption of Gann Initiative (Proposition 4) Annual Appropriations Limit The Gann Initiative limited state and local government appropriations of proceeds from tax sources to an amount based on changes in population and the cost of living over the 1978-79 base year, with allowances made for state and federally-mandated items. This process was modified in 1990 by the passage of Proposition 111 which provided an alternative for the cost-of-living calculation and changed the base year to 1986-87. Each year the Boards must now select the cost of living factor using the higher of the change in California per capita personal income or the change in the non-residential assessed value for the service area. Based upon information supplied by the State Department of Finance and the Orange County Assessor, staff has calculated that a higher appropriations limit for 1991-92 results from the use of the change in California per capita personal Income. This selection must be made by a vote of the governing body and is now, therefore, included in the required annual Resolution to establish or fix the annual Gann Limits. For 1991-92, the "net proceeds of taxes" are well within the appropriations limits as set forth below: 1991-92 District Net 1991-92 District No. Tax Appropriations Budget Gann Limitations 1 $ -0- $ 2,465,000 2 1,028,000 9,144,000 *� 3 3,032,000 12,414,OOD 5 1,395,000 2,316,000 6 77,000 1,466,000 7 2,017,000 3,596,000 11 908,000 2,488,000 13 Not Applicable Not Applicable 14 Not Applicable Not Applicable Committee Recommendation: The Committee recommends adoption of the proposed budgets for 1991-92, and adoption of the Gann limits. A detailed transmittal is contained in the enclosed, bound report. If any Director needs additional information, please call Gary Streed, Director of Finance, at (714) 962-2411. 2) Ctt of Fountain Va11e Conditional Use Permits for Plant No. 1 Treatment Plant Expansion an Improvements. Treatment Plant No. 1 was originally constructed at its present site in the 1920's. In 1957 the City of Fountain Valley was incorporated and the Districts' Plant No. 1 is situated in the most southeasterly corner of the City's boundaries. During the past 30 plus years the Districts and the City of Fountain Valley have had an excellent and cooperative relationship. For example, the Districts have .� allowed the City to use the treatment plant site for police and fire department training, civil defense training and supplies storage, and other similar accommodations. These have all been done informally without the need for contractual arrangements. (3 of 5) r Executive Committee Report June 26, 1991 \..i Recognizing the impact that operation of a sewage treatment facility could potentially have on the adjacent community, the Districts have always made a special attempt to be good neighbors. Several years ago, for example, the Boards approved the expenditure of millions of dollars in improvements at Plant No. 1 to construct facilities for odor and air emission controls and, further, declared a policy of enclosing all future facilities for odor control. Certain other mitigation measures have also been implemented. Extensive perimeter and interior landscaping to beautify and screen the plant (support buildings are also located to help screen the plant) and front entrance modifications to improve traffic safety and circulation along busy Ellis Avenue have either been accomplished or are underway. In addition, in 1986, in response to concerns expressed by the City over the potential extension of the Districts' service area boundaries which might trigger the need to further expand Plant No. 1 beyond what is currently envisioned, the Boards adopted a policy limiting service to those areas within the then adopted sphere of influence of the Districts, and territory then served under contract. In 1983, the Boards also discontinued consideration of a waste-to-energy co-combustion facility at Plant No. 1 in response to concerns expressed by the City. Over the years, although the Districts have regularly briefed the City on proposed treatment plant expansions and routinely submitted proposed plans for support buildings (administrative offices, laboratories, shops and warehouses) for review and approval , the Districts have never submitted plans for the .../ treatment plant facilities for approval , nor has the City requested such submittals. However, in 1987 the City formally communicated with the Districts declaring their intent to require the Districts to apply for conditional use permits for construction and operation of all treatment facilities. It is the opinion of the Districts' General Counsel that the City of Fountain Valley does not have the authority to require conditional use permits of the Districts. The City's zoning ordinances do not apply to the Districts because the legislature and the courts have determined that one municipality should not be able to defeat the exercise of power of another public agency; and that where a regional type facility such as the Sanitation Districts' treatment plant (which provides the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal services on an exclusive basis for all of the other communities in metropolitan Orange County) operates within the scope of the political authority of a larger "regional " governmental unit, the regional agency's rights are superior because its responsibilities transcend local municipal boundaries. Otherwise, for example, if the City chose to use its zoning powers to control facilities improvements and extensions at Plant No. 1, it could, in effect, preclude potential development of the other cities and the unincorporated County territory within the Districts' boundaries or spheres of influence, thus effectively usurping the land use decision making authority of the governing bodies of the other 22 cities and the County. In 1987, the Boards directed the Joint Chairman to communicate with the City's representatives to try and work out a satisfactory solution. Meetings were held and it appeared as if the issue had been resolved. However, in November 1990 the General Counsel reported to the Committee that the issue had v surfaced again. The Planning Director of the City of Fountain Valley had (4 of 5) Executive Committee Report June 26, 1991 v informed the Districts that the City was refusing to issue a building permit for construction of the Districts' new Control Center/Operations and Maintenance Building, Job No. J-23-1, unless the Districts applied for a conditional use permit under the terms of the zoning ordinance of the City. This notice and action by the City was after the Districts submitted an application, paid plan check fees and the building plans were approved by the City. Staff and Counsel reported that since November, several discussions have been held between representatives of the Districts and the City. We had agreed to prepare a memorandum of understanding for consideration by the governing bodies of the two agencies. The J-23-1 project plans and specifications were then prepared and were ready to proceed to bid. Upon advice of counsel the contract was bid and awarded and is now under construction. The City Attorney and the Districts' General Counsel were in the process of drafting the MOU when, on June 11th, the City issued a stop work order on the J-23-1 project. Because of potential litigation over this issue threatened by the City of Fountain Valley the Joint Chairman convened the Executive Committee into closed session to discuss the matter. Following the discussion the Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman were authorized to meet with the Fountain Valley Mayor and Councilmember representing the City on the Districts' Boards to see if the issue can be resolved to the satisfaction of both the City and the Districts. The aforementioned meeting has taken place and at the direction of the City Council and Districts' Board leadership the City and Districts' staff are �,.. meeting further in an attempt to see if something can be worked out. At this writing the matter remains unresolved. Enclosed is a memorandum (buff) from the General Counsel regarding the issue and the MOU (tan) drafted by Counsel . 3) Closed Session re Personnel Matters. The Joint Chairman convened the Executive Committee into closed session to discuss personnel matters. JWS:sc Enclosures (5 of 5) 2`6 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN CITY OF ey FOUNTAIN VALLEY AND COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT p1S��Q05 it�0� QJ// NOS. 1, 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGECOUNTY, CALIFORNIA, .F GeV DISTRICTS' RECLAMATION REGARDING PL G SANITATION ANTN0ANi THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING is entered into, t0 be effective the day of , 1991, by and between: CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "cityll; AND COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, for itself and on behalf of County sanitation District Nos. 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, a political subdivision of the State of California formed and existing pursuant to the County Sanitation District Act, California Health & Safety Code section 4700 at seq. , hereinafter individually referred to as "District" and collectively as "Districts" . W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, City is a general law city that has land use and zoning authority within its boundaries; and WHEREAS, Districts, and each of them, are independent special districts and political subdivisions of the State of California, organized and existing pursuant to the provisions of the County Sanitation District Act, California Health & Safety Code Section 4700; and WHEREAS, Districts jointly own and operate the Reclamation Plant No. 1 facilities pursuant to the terms and conditions of that certain Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement by �..i and among Districts, effective July 1, 1995; and DRAFT--for Staff Discussion Purposes J V L — ♦ — e a , ury o _ _ rtuu ,a ,� uu i. n u . DRAFT. For Staff Discussion Purposes Only _ WHEREAS, Districts' Reclamation Plant No. 1 is operated as a wastewater treatment plant to provide treatment and disposal of wastewater for 24 incorporated cities and unincorporated areas within the County of orange; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65401 provides that if a General Plan has been adopted by a city, the governing body of any special district whose jurisdiction lies wholly or partially within the city, whose functions include preparing plans for and constructing major public works, shall submit to the City Council a list of the proposed public works recommended for planning, initiation or construction during the ensuing fiscal year. The city is then required to list and classify all such recommendations and prepare a coordinated program of proposed public works for the ensuing fiscal year. Such coordinated program is required to then be submitted to the city planning agency for review and a report as to conformity with the adopted General Plan; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65403 provides an alternative procedure to that of Section 65401, in that each special district that constructs or maintains public facilities essential to the growth and maintenance of an urban population may prepare a five- year Capital improvement program. "Public facilities" are defined to specifically include facilities for the collection, treatment, reclamation and disposal of sewage. Before such a plan may be adopted, it must submit the program to the city's planning agency for conformity with the city's General Plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Fountain Valley is a "Responsible 2 DRAFT-Tor Staff Discussion Purposes Only DRAFT••For Staff Discussion Purposes Only Agency", as that term is defined in the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21069) with respect to major construction projects within its boundaries and does desire to offer its early comments on any District project that may have a significant effect on the environment; and WHEREAS, Government Code Sections 53090 - 53096, inclusive, contain previsions relating to the regulation of local agencies, counties and cities with respect to building and zoning ordinances; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 53091 provides that each local agency shall comply with all applicable building ordinances and zoning ordinances of the city in which it is located, except that building ordinances of a city shall not apply to the location or construction of facilities for the production, generation, storage or transmission of water or wastewater by the local agency; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 53096 provides that the governing body of a local agency, by a 4/5ths vote of its members, may render a city's zoning ordinance inapplicable to a proposed use if the local agency determines, by resolution at a noticed public hearing, that there is no feasible alternative to the proposal, and must provide notice to the city of such action so that the city may challenge that action in the Superior Court; and WHEREAS, City has adopted zoning laws, codified as Title 21 of the Fountain Valley Municipal Code, and has, by ordinance, designated that Districts' treatment plant facility located within 3 It �Rpf�S5. Foy oR�ss1oh the municipal boundaries is in the " I1 Manufacturing District"; and WHEREAS, Fountain Valley Municipal Code Chapter 21.40 describes the M-1 Manufacturing District and provides that "sewage treatment and disposal plants" are subject to the conditional use permit requirements of the Code; and WHEREAS, Fountain Valley Municipal Code Section 21.76. 095 provides that no person shall operate an activity or use for which a conditional use permit is required without a valid conditional use permit, violations of which are a misdemeanor; and WHEREAS, Districts' operation of Reclamation Plant No. 1 is regulated by the provisions contained in the Federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S. Code Section 2351 et seq. ) ; the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Act (California Water Code Section 13000 et seq. ) ; the California Ocean Plan (adopted pursuant to California Water Code Section 13000 et seq. ) ; and the California Air Resources Act (California Health & Safety Code Section 40000 et seq. ) ; and WHEREAS, Districts must secure and in fact have obtained permits for the construction and operation of all of the wastewater treatment and disposal facilities located at Reclamation Plant No. 1, said permits having been issaed for the regional service of Districts by the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") ; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Santa Ana Region ("RWQCB") ; the State Water Resources Control Board ("SWRCB") ; and the South Coast Air Quality Management District ("SCAQMD") ; and 4 oPAF<�510T O'S O��Y DRAFT -For Staff Discussion Purpcses Only WHEREAS, Districts have determined that in providing the regional wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities for the 24 communities within their services area, serving a population of greater than 2. 0 million persons, that they are not governed by the provisions of local ordinances adopted by City; and WHEREAS, Districts developed and prepared their 1989 Master Plan of Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities, including specifically all facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, and subr.,itted said Plan, prior to adoption, to City, pursuant to Government Code Section 65403; and WHEREAS, City reviewed said Master Plan and adopted a finding that it was in conformance with the General Plan of City; and WHEREAS, Districts adopted Resolution Nos. 89-101 and 89-102, certifying the Final Program EIR for the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan and making certain findings regarding said raster Plan; and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on August 9, 1989, Districts made a determination that the capital improvements/facility program for Reclamation Plant No. 1 of the Districts' Master Plan, would be in conformity with the General Plan of City; and WHEREAS, Districts have never been required and City has never issued a conditional use zoning permit for the wastewater treatment facilities at Reclamation. Plant No. 1; and V,'HEREAS, the parties hereto have determined that it is in the best interests of each party to resolve the dispute regarding the 5 Dlu slo^N'Pcses 001 DRAMT.or Staff Discussion Furpin.*a Only legal rights and responsibilities of each party without extensive litigation; and WHEREAS, the parties desire to provide a system of land use review that will protect the interests of the residents of City without requiring Districts to be subject to the discretionary review and approval process of the City's zoning ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1: In reliance upon the protections afforded in this Agreement, as well as the protections provided by other laws, City intends to amend its zoning ordinance to no longer require that Districts be subject to City's conditional use permit authority. The parties acknowledge, understand and agree that City may not have the power to contract away its zoning authority, and _ City does not intend to do so by this Agreement. City retains the right to re-enact a zoning ordinance granting to City discretionary approval authority or any other lawful authority over Districts' wastewater treatment and disposal facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1 at any time. Re-enactment of discretionary zoning approval by ordinance, resolution or other lawful authority shall, however, release Districts from any and all obligations toward City, except that the same may exist independent of this Agreement. Section 2 : Districts will continue to recognize City as a Responsible Agency under the provisions of CEQA, and will consult with city at all stages of the review process, in accordance with all applicable governing statutes, regulations and guidelines. s 6 � es Discussion u sion Out onb DRAFT--For Staff: Discussion Purport Only�, . . ,.J Section 3 : This Agreement incorporates herein the 1989 Master Plan of Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities, and specifically the Master Plan of Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. attached as Exhibit "A" hereto, together with the itemized revisions to said Reclamation Plant No. 1 Master Plan set forth on Exhibit "B", attached hereto. Districts shall, in accordance with Government Code Section 65403 , annually submit to City any proposed revisions to the Master Plan of Facilities located at Reclamation Plant No. 1. The submittal shall be made at least sixty (60) days prior to its adoption by the governing Boards of Directors of Districts. City shall have the right to review, comment and make the determination that the facilities set forth in the revisions are in conformance with the City's General Plan. T Section 4: Districts shall submit to City all plans and specifications, together with an application for building permits, for all support facilities related to the wastewater treatment and disposal facilities, located at any location within Reclamation Plant 170. 1. City shall cause said plans and specifications to be checked in accordance with the governing Uniform Building Code and other applicable technical construction Codes, and shall issue building permits upon approval of said plans and specifications as meeting all requirements of the technical Codes. For support buildings, development review shall be conducted by City to insure quality of design and aesthetics. city agrees that it will not withhold its consent and approval unreasonably. 0 t � 7 0 Ru I-o' a � • VSc51� ' ^'� -• PoS'pS DNS, DRAM-For Stall Discussion Purpose$ Only Section 5: Districts shall submit to City plans for all landscaping installations at Reclamation Plant No. 1 which are located within a distance within feet of the Districts' property line along Ellis Avenue and Ward Street. City agrees that it will not withhold its consent and approval of said landscaping unreasonably, and will review and make a determination on Districts' plans in accordance with the same standards as all other public or private developments within City. All approvals shall be made in accordance with the provisions of city building, planning and zcning ordinances, and Districts reserve the right of appeal to the City Council of any decision made by City's Staff or City's Planning Commission.. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Memorandum of Understanding is executed by each of the parties as of the date subscribed below. "CITY" CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY, a municipal Corporation By Mayor ATTEST: city Clerk ���r Slab APPROVED AS TO FORM: D1} sslon NfP05eS pnly city Attorney 8 � 1, J ,Y apc0 RAJ Kl� C6WVVLrtV � r �, "DISTRICTS" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation District Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange county, California, a political subdivision of the State of California BY Chairman, Board of Directors By Secretary, Board of Directors APPROVED AS TO FORM: THOMAS L. WOODRUFF DISTRICT COUNSEL By TLW-.pj (B12) O6/28/91 07/01/91 9 RE : AGENDA ITEM NO . 14 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS June 26, 1991 41 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 10944 ELLIS AVENUE PO BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CAUIOANIA 92728.0127 REPORT OF THE FISCAL POLICY C@FIITTEE M1419624411 Fiscal Policy C®mxittee Contacted by Phone Poll: Unavailable: William Mahoney, Cha=rnran James Evans John M. Gullixson Dan Griffin Evelyn Bart Charles E. Puckett Peer Swan James Wahner (race Winchell At the regular meeting on June 12, 1991, the Joint Boards of Directors authorized and directed the Fiscal Policy Committee to evaluate proposals and to place IDcess Workers' Compensation insurance coverage effective July 1, 1991, because proposals would not be received in time to be considered at the June Joint Board meeting. The Districts' existing coverage levels and alternatives submitted by our broker, Coast Insurance, are summarized below: Self-Insured Rate Estimated Alternative Coverage Retention (SIR1 100 Premium adHting Statutory $250,000 $.1708 $36,251 Alt A Statutory $250,000 $.1767 $43,775 Alt B Statutory $300,000 $.1484 $36,765 Alt C $10 Million $250,000 $.1564 $38,768 Alt C $10 Million $300,000 $.1281 $31,758 The estimated premiums are based upon estimated/budgeted payrolls and are adjusted to reflect actual payrolls after year end. The premium for Alternative A, a continuation of existing coverage, shows an estimated total increase of $7,524. Increased premiums are a result of benefits increased by the state and an increased salaries and wages budget. In 1985, the Excess Workers' CaRpensation coverage was expanded to include the California statutory benefits at an increased premium of approximately 7%. This extra protection was considered desirable in the event of a major incident which caild involve a group of employees and because there are no upper limits on California claims. The insurance coverage limit was raised from $10 million to unlimited coverage at that time. Report of the Fiscal Policy Comedttee Page 2 June 26, 1991 t The purpose for the purchase of Excess Loss coverage is to provide outside financial assistance in the event of a catastrophic claim or series of claims. Since the inception of the Workers' Compensation Self-Insured Fund in 1979, the Districts have paid $1.4 minnian for claims; an average of approximately $125,000 per year. In no year have we had a reason to receive an excess loss reimbursement. Our safety program has assisted in msinta ng a low level of claims for an organization of our size, ocuplexity and scope of operation. The Ccamittee has selected Alternative A, offered by General Reinsurance and Firemans Flud, for an estimated annual premium of $43,775 and reccmnends ratification of this action. The reccusexled policy is a continuation of the existing policy at a slight, less than 3.5%, inarease in premium per $100 of payroll. The 1991-92 Workers' Compensation Self-Insured Fund Budget, which was approved by the Joint Boards, includes $37,000 for excess loss coverage. The annual cost exceeding the budget allocation, could easily be covered from the reserves of $637,000. GGS:lc REF:FPC91/RFPC6.26-7 RE : AGENDA ITEM #15 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 108C<ELLIS AVENUE R D Oox 9127 FIXIMAIN VALUEY.CALIFORNIA 92)28-912) P1A1962-9A,1 June 26, 1991 REPORT OF THE BUILDING COMMITTEE Meeting Date: June 20, 1991 - 5:30 p.m. COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Present: Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering Norman E. Culver, Chairman Roger Carrillo, Bob Bell Architect Walter K. Bowman John Collins Don R. Griffin Jack Kelly Mark Schwing Charles Sylvia Absent: Fred Barrera Carrey Nelson Jim Wahner WAREHOUSE BUILDING AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. 132-35-2 AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING AT PLANT NO. 27JOB NO. P2-35-3 Exterior architectural elevations for both buildings were reviewed by Committee members. Staff presented renderings prepared by the architect supplemented by additional renderings prepared by staff. The renderings were prepared in photometric form so that the Directors could review them in the context of how the buildings would be viewed from outside the treatment plant. The Committee members decided that a common theme for both the maintenance building and the warehouse would look best and directed staff to prepare cost differentials for several architectural schemes for additional review by the Committee. In addition the Comittee gave staff specific direction on the design and landscaping. The next Building Committee meeting is tentatively scheduled for Thursday, July 25, 1991 at 5:30 p.m. TMD:bja ENG/BLDG.COMM:BCR.6.1 RE ; AGENDA ITEM NO. 17 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS RELATIVE TO PLANT NO. 1 CONTROL CENTER INSTRUMENTATION, JOB NO. J-23-2, AND REPLACEMENT OF COMPUTERIZED MONITORING SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-44 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS M ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA June 24, 1991 1O EUG AVFMIE V U BOX Div N WNN VALLEY.GIRUUNIA MM4127 Ai<1662Y 11 STAFF REPORT Recommendation Re Award of Plant I Control Center Instrumentation Job No. J-23-2 and Replacement of Computerized Monitoring System at Plant No. 2 Job No. P2-44 Background In March 1991, the Directors approved plans and specifications for the procurement and installation of computer monitoring and control system at both treatment facilities. Previously, in August 1990 the Boards had prequalified five manufacturers for supplying the equipment. The two jobs have been packaged to bid together and allow the Districts to install identical systems at both facilities that will reduce operator training, and allow standardization of spare parts and provide a simplified system to collect, store and distribute plant generating information to all divisions within the Districts. The project will provide the means to acquire existing operational data, which currently uses dozens of cables that are prone to interruption and will be expandable in the future to transmit all process information to the new Control Center as the facility grows according to Master Plan requirements. By having the ability to monitor all equipment and processes, the Operation's staff will have the tools to prevent out-of-compliance conditions on processes that operate under permits, specifically South Coast Air Quality Management District and Regional Water Quality Control Board regulatory requirements. The new computer system will consist of a dual redundant fiber optic cable routed throughout the Plants. This will provide a highway for information to be transmitted between processes and to the new Operations Center. Connected to the highway will be a device called a data concentrator. This unit will provide a means for information to be collected from field devices, namely programmable logic controllers, and transmit process information to the central computer for monitoring, storing and reporting information. The plans and specifications require that the system shall observe existing information and have the hardware and software necessary for future control of all processes associated with the treatment of wastewater. As each new process begins design or construction, or an existing facility is modified, the information necessary to control and acquire data will be added to the computer system, specifically, as the facilities grow the computer system shall have the ability to expand up to master planned requirements. On May 21, 1991, four bids were received for the Plant I Control Center Instrumentation, Job No. J-23-2, and Replacement of Computerized Monitoring ..� System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-44. The bids ranged from a high of $5,152,358.00 to a low of $3,752,000.00 submitted by HSQ Technology of South San Francisco, California. The second low bidder, JWP Controls, was non-responsive because they designated a data concentrator that had not been pre-qualified and approved by the Directors. A bid tabulation is attached. Letters of Protest Subsequent to the receipt of bids the third and fourth bidder, together with �..� their suppliers, have filed letters protesting the award to the low bidder, HSQ Technology (the second low bidder, J.W.P. Controls did not meet the specifications) . Sachs Electric and its supplier, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, as well as the fourth bidder, Johnson Yokogama, believe that HSQ Technology and its supplier, Allen Bradley, are deficient in the requirement to supply a computer program (software) which meets the specifications. The specifications say that the equipment supplier shall be responsible for the meeting the software requirement. Letters have also been received from HSQ Technology, the low bidder, and Allen Bradley, its supplier, which state that they fully intend to meet the requirements of the specifications. Staff has also received a letter from the designer, EMA, which states they believe HSQ Technology/Allen Bradley, as well as the other two responsive bidders, can in fact meet the specifications. The essence of the protests appears to be Addendum 2 which added technical clarifications including the following to Section 52-0100: "The supplier of the data concentrators shall review all shop drawings prior to the Contractor's official submittal to the Districts. The data concentrator manufacturer shall certify on the shop drawing that the equipment being supplied is completely compatible and shall be properly integrated to make a complete system and perform to the requirements of these lr/ Specifications." Addendum 2 also added the following paragraph to Section 52-0370: "The data concentrator manufacturer shall provide all operation and application software associated with the system described in these Specifications. It is the responsibility of the data concentrator supplier to provide all support services associated with the data concentrator software. The Contractor and the data concentrator manufacturer shall certify that the software has been correctly installed and configured prior to the final acceptance of the system." The purpose of adding these paragraphs was to ensure that the supplier had responsibility to make sure that the software was compatible with the Districts' needs and would, in. fact, meet the requirements of the specifications. From past experiences, Districts have had difficulties when equipment is installed by a contractor with little or no support in start-up and operational needs. These additions to the specifications were intended to make sure the supplier of the equipment and the installer had full responsibility to ensure that the equipment worked. The bid proposal nowhere indicaes a deviation from this specification. Our consultant, EMA, confirms this point. The remainder of the protest generally had to do with allegations that HSQ Technology and their supplier, Allen Bradley, could not meet the requirements of the above paragraphs. Districts' staff and the designer have no proof that this -2- is the case. HSQ Technology and Allen Bradley have both submitted letters stating they will , in fact, meet these requirements. Performance of the �..✓ equipment and software could not be determined ultimately until installed and operationally tested. Therefore, staff believes it is premature, and unsubstantiated, to claim that they cannot meet the requirements of the specifications. Attached are copies of all the letters received. Staff Recommendation Based on the letters received from the apparent low bidder, the apparent low bidder's supplier, and the Districts' designer, it appears that the apparent low bidder and the supplier can, in fact, meet the requirements of the specifications. Therefore, staff recommends that the letters of protest be received, filed and denied and that the contract be awarded to HSQ Technology in their low bid amount of $3,752,000.00. TMD:jt £NG/J123-2:SR1 Attachments: Date From Relationship May 22, 1991 Sachs Electric Third Low Bidder v May 30, 1991 HSQ Technology Low Bidder May 30, 1991 EMA Districts' Designer June 4, 1991 Sachs Electric Third Low Bidder June 4, 1991 Johnson Yokogawa High Bidder June 5, 1991 Westinghouse Elec. Suppler to Sachs Elec. June 6, 1991 Allen Bradley Supplier to HSQ Tech. June 7, 1991 HSQ Technology Low Bidder June 7, 1991 HSQ Technology Low Bidder June 25, 1991 EMA Districts' Designer July 2, 1991 Districts' Counsel Counsel July 3, 1991 Johnson Yokogawa High Bidder July 5, 1991 Sachs Electric Third Low Bidder Sachs Electric ;X{/ 1 Licenfe NumON N15C8 17177 HD RWD N6-]:ID ADELANW,CALIFORNIA 923D1 619 246.3277(FAX] May 22, 1991 Orange County Sanitation Department P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Attn: Ms. Rita Brown Re: Invitations for Bids Contract #J-23-2 and P2-" This letter is to notify you of our protest of the bids submitted by the two apparent low bidders for the reference project. Our protest is based on the following: 1. Section 52-0370 specifies a standard control system. Sachs bid includes a standard control system. The two apparent low bidders did not include a standard control system. Allen-Bradley does not manufacture a standard control system. 2. Section 52-0370 specifies custom software and custom hardware will not be accepted. The two apparent low bidders included custom software. Sachs Electric has listed a sole source supplier for the hardware and software that complies without exception to the specifications. 3. Section 68.0995.01, .02, and .05 specifies the work station's bid by the two apparent low bidders do not meet the user functions, diagnostic and test requirements. The work station bid by Sachs meets all specified requirements and in most cases exceeds the specifications. Tabulations of the bids indicate certain bidders had price advantages. These advantages were squired by not complying with the specifications. The failure of the two low bidders to comply with the specification gave them an unfair economic advantage over the other bidders. Sachs' bid meets the full intent of the request by providing a standard control system which will result in savings to the owner in the form of future expansions, maintenance and reliability. Any savings assumed by the owner comparing the proposals as submitted would not be an accurate evaluation without anticipating future costs of a system not in full compliance with the specifications. This letter serves as a formal protest of the bids of the two apparent low bidders as being non-responsive, and a request for a hearing on this protest. Please furnish us with copies of any reports prepared by staff in response to this protest. Please inform us of the date, time, and place that the district will have a hearing on this protest. We reserve our rights to include other areas of non-responsiveness by the two apparent low bidders in this protest. Sincerely, SACHS ELECTRIC COMPANY Richard � Regional Manageree ttee CSC/lkp - 114 Sachs Electric f4[enSB NUTOp,NISC6 17177 KML I D 616 246 62A PmElAN10.GLtF RNIR a2 619 2M=71FR%1 June 4, 1991 Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Attn: Thomas Dawes Re: Invitation for Bids Director of Engineering Contract AJ-23-2 and P2-44 Sachs Electric Protest dated May 22, 1991 Dear Mr. Dawes: In our letter dated May 22, 1991, we filed with you our protest of the two low bids on the above-referenced contracts. We set forth in that letter certain grounds of protest. In the last paragraph we reserved our right to include other areas of nonresponsiveness by the two apparent low bidders. The purpose of this letter is to provide you with additional data supporting our bid protest. As you know, the contract on this project must be awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder whose bid meets the requirements �./ of the specifications. The basic rule of competitive bidding on public works is that the bids must conform to the specifications, and if a bid does not conform to the specifications, it may not be accepted. The reason for this rule is that if the low bid does not conform to the specifications, it gives the low bidder an economic advantage over the other bidders. In other words, the purpose of the rule is to ensure that all the bidders are playing by the same rules. The facts in this case make it clear that the two low bids did not conform to the specifications, and therefore the two low bidders had an unfair economic advantage over Sachs by allowing them to make a lower bid from the specifications. The purpose of requiring public bodies to require competitive public bidding is to eliminate unfair bidding practices. Because of the potential for abuse arising from deviations from strict adherence to the specifications, the letting of public contracts must be closely scrutinized, and contracts that will be set aside by the courts. This is true even if the deviation from the specifications would save the public body some money. The importance of maintaining equal competitive bidding requires strict compliance with the bidding requirements. To permit the Orange County Sanitation District to allow the two low bidders to deviate from the precise specifications leaves Sachs and other bidders in the unfair position of having to guess what will satisfy the needs of the Orange County Sanitation District. Sachs and all other bidders were entitled to expect that bids which did not meet the specifications would be rejected in favor of those which did meet the specifications. As pointed out in our later dated May 22, 1991, Sachs' bid met the \� specifications in all particulars. The bid of the two low bidders did not meet the specifications as hereinafter set forth. 1. Spec section 68-2 68-0911 B and C provides that under fully loaded conditions with maximum data base, the capability to display graphics within one second of the request will be provided. Further, that specification requires that from the time the operator requests a change until the request has traveled to the data concentrator, the total travel time shall not exceed three seconds. The bid of H.S.Q. Technology will not meet these requirements in that the suppliers listed have not proven this capability. 2. Under Specification section 68-2 68-0911F, systemwide time synchronization to 1 ms resolution must be maintained. The bid of HSQ Technology will not meet this specification in that the suppliers listed have not proven this capability. 3. Under spec section 52-370 requires the data concentrators shall be provided and configure to the application software. The listed data concentrator suppliers must provide and configure all application software. HSQ Technology is not a pre-qualified supplier of a standard software system for the listed data concentrator suppliers and has not proven before bid time that this is a standard system. 1. Spec section 68-2 68-0911 B and C provides that under fully loaded conditions with maximum data base, the capability to display graphics within one second of the request will be provided. Further, that specification requires that from the time the operator requests a change until the rquest has traveled to the data concentrator, the total travel time shall not exceed three seconds. The bid of J.W.P. Controls will not meet these requirements in that the suppliers listed have not proven this capability. 2. Under specification section 68-2 68-0911F, systemwide synchronization to 1 me resolution must be maintianed. The bid of J.W.P. Controls will not meet this specification in that the suppliers listed have not proven this capability. 3. Under specification section 52-370 requires the data concentrators shall be provided and configure to the application software. The listed data concentrator suppliers must provide and configure all application software. J.W.P. Controls is not a pre-qualified supplier of a standard software system for the listed data concentrator suppliers and has not proven before bid time that this is a standard system. As a result of the foregoing analysis, it is clear that both H.S.Q. Technology and J.W.P. Controls have substantially deviated from the specifications, giving them an unfair economic advantage over Sachs. We believe their bids should be rejected and the contract be awarded to Sachs as the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Please advise us of the date, time and place of hearing on this bid protest. Sincerely, SAA'CHS ELECTRIC COMPANY Richard D. Zuroweste Regional Manager CC: Rita Brown CSC/lkp - 119 SENT VIA FAX MSL-91-160 June 4, 1991 Ms. Rita J. Brown Board Secretary Orange County Sanitation Districts 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 Dear Ms. Brown: Johnson Yokogawa Corporation is one of a few organizations that has the distinction of being an Automation Partner of the Allen-Bradley Company. In a recent conversation with members of that company we were informed that the bid submitted to you (job no. J-23-2, Plant 1 Control Center Instrumentation and job no. P244, Replacement of Computerized Monitoring System at Plant No. 2) on May 21, 1991 by HSQ contains no application software responsibility by the Allen-Bradley Company. According to Addendum 2, dated May 7, 1991, the data concentrator manufacturer shall guarantee the performance of the system and be responsible for all operation and application software. The following is an excerpt from Addendum No. 2: DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS 1. Section 52-0100 Summary of Work Add the following to paragraph D, page 52-2: 'The supplier of the data concentrators shall review all shop drawings prior to the Contractor's official submittal to the Districts. The data concentrator manufacturer shall certify on the shop drawing that the equipment being supplied is completely compatible and shall be properly integrated to make a complete system and perform to the requirements of these Specifications." Johnson Yokogawa Corporation Ms. Rita J. Brown Orange County Sanitation Districts June 4, 1991 \..� Page Two 2. Section 52-0370 Standard Control Systems Add the following to paragraph to page 52-13: '"1'he data concentrator manufacturer shall provide all operation and application software associated with the system described in these Specifications. It is the responsibility of the data concentrator supplier to provide all support services associated with the Data Concentrator software. The Contractor and the data concentrator manufacturer shall certify that the software has been correctly installed and configured prior to final acceptance of the system." Based on these requirements we believe the HSQ bid should be disqualified. Johnson Yokogawa Corporation would appreciate The District clarifying its position on this subject. Thank you for your consideration of the matter. Sincerely, J�OHNSON YOKOGAWA CORPORATION James My Account Executive JLM:ec Westinghouse Energy Systems PN COMMIDWISI n Electric Corporation 783 Pdimyrna Annue NwrSide Uiilood 92507 1714)696 9990 171a 6959808 FAX June 5, 1991 Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 Fountain valley, CA 92728-8127 Attn: Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering Re: Invitation for Bids Contract #3-23-2 and P2-44 Sachs Electric protest dated May 22, 1991 and letter dated June 4, 1991 Dear Mr. Dawes, We received today a copy of Sachs Electric's protest letter to you dated June 4, 1991 . We wish to add additional technical information in support of this letter. There are areas of the specification, particularly addendum 2, listed below which are met by Westinghouse and we feel that the HSQ bid utilizing Allen Bradley cannot meet. Westinghouse Process Control Division has interfaced WDPF to numerous Allen Bradley Programmable controllers and Networks . Our engineers have had in depth exposure to Allen Bradley equipment and systems. To date, we have not witnessed any Allen Bradley equipment and/or system that can meet the below listed Orange County Sanitation District's specified requirements: Pace Paragraph Specification 68-2 68-0911 B 9 C Under fully loaded conditions, with maximum data base, the capability to display graphics within one second of request -do not exceed three seconds from the time the operator requests a change until this request has travelled to the data 68-2 68-0911 E Under fully loaded conditions . . . .no single component failure shall - -�F--« •*.. nno�arion of another element. 68-2 68-0911 F Maintain system-wide time synchronization to 1 MS resolution. 68-66 68-0980. 02 Provide fully redundant data concentrators with auto failover and bumpless transfer. 68-67 68-0980.04 Provide diagnostics for the redundant data concentrators. . . . down to the I/O card level . Another section of the specification which is met completely by Westinghouse is section 52-370. This section requires that the data concentrator supplier must both provide and configure the applications software. Allen Bradley historically is a hardware supplier. Pie are not cognizant of Allen Bradley providing or configuring the application software for any project with this scope of supply. We do not believe that the system proposed by HSQ meets the technical requirements of your specification and can operate within the system -response time needed. We suggest that you visit an operating system that implements the standard hardware and standard software that HSQ Technology is planning to supply in this project. We reccommend that you reject the HSQ Technology and JWP Controls proposals as nonresponsive and award the contract to Sachs Electric . Westinghouse Process Control Division has an experienced Control Systems Group, specializing in controls for water and wastewater applications . We would like to work as an extension of your staff to produce the most reliable and efficient monitoring and control DCS System to manage your wastewater Reclamation Facility. we are familiar with your system and understand its needs. We understand your expectations for reliability, not only in the control system itself but in its communications with remote areas, and we are prepared to design, configure and implement a system with these and other criteria in mind. We also have an experienced service organization in our Riverside office, which will be available to service your needs locally. Westinghouse would be very pleased to meet your control system needs as a DCS supplier. If we can provide additional information or clarification do not hesitate to contact Heather Wells or the undersigned. Very truly yours, UL' /`' �U11-1 i" 2 Nick Pregibon Manager, Energy 6 Environmental Marketing Westinghouse Electric Corporation Process Control Division cc: Sachs Electric PACIFIC PARTS AND CONTROLS, INC. June 27, 1991 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Ave. Fountain Valley, CA 92728 Attn: Jim Harris Re: Problems with bid for Job No. J-23-2 and P2-44. Dear Jim, I am truly concerned with the course this bid has taken. I am afraid that the district was not presented with all of the viable choices for Data Concentrators, the specification was written in a lopsided manner, and the current low bidder clearly does not meet the specifications. Even though you may be already aware of the following problems I feel it is my obligation to make sure that these are clear as so to help the district make an informed decision. �../ 1. The specification was written with an unfair advantage towards Allen-Bradley. This is evident by the fact that they were the only programmable controller manufacturer allowed to bid versus three Distributed Control System (DCS) manufacturers. This unbalance was substantiated by the Allen-Bradley proposal being approximately 40% less than any of the DCS proposals. While at the same time the DCS proposals were within 2% of each other. 2. The open bidding process was foregone on this job by only accepting bids from prequalified suppliers. The problem here is that there was not an open selection of suppliers put though the pregt:alification process. For example, EMA had never talked to Allen-Bradley's primary competitor, Modicon, about this project. Modicon has a practical and potentially cost effective solution, but they were never even given a chance to be considered. By the time this job was made public, vendors with more competitive solutions to Allen- Bradley were already shut out. 3. The bid specifically states: "The data concentrator manufacturer shall provide all operation and application software associated with the system described in these Specifications." The proposal submitted by HSQ will use software created by HSQ. HSQ is not a prequalified data concentrator manufacturer. Additionally Allen-Bradley probably does not support HSQ's software. Since there are several software brands being used on this Allen-Bradley equipment, it can not be said that any of these combinations are a standard system. 6255 Prescott Court . Chino.California 91710 • (714)465-1174 1 Fax(714)465-1178 Besides these seemingly legal problems I believe that Allen- Bradley's Pyramid integrator (PI) would be a poor match for the District's needs. From what I understand it uses a MicroVAX that is not supported by DEC and has little or no expansion capabilities. In an article in Computer Integrated Manufacturing published by the Gartner Group, Inc. they list the PI 's Minuses as "Expensive", "Behind price/performance curve" and "Application could outgrow processor". I believe that if the District desires a true DCS Manufacturers system then the Allen-Bradley proposal should be thrown out on the basis of not mc_ting the specification. On the other hand if the District would like to consider the A-B approach, then. I feel that the District should entertain other comparable systems that would probably be more flexible and more widely supported yet still be competitively priced. Understanding that the approved system is something that will be lived with for years to come, I wish the Districts well in their decision on this project. Sincerely, PaciffiiLcc Parts & Controls, Inc. �5 Rei Re n k Sales Engineer cc: J. Vincent T. Dawes MSL-91-211 July 3, 1991 Mr. John R. Shaw General Counsel Orange County Sanitation Districts 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8128 Dear Mr. Shaw: We are in receipt of your notice on the upcoming hearings for projects J- 23-2 and P2-44. Johnson Yokogawa Corporation firmly believes that the requirements issued under the District's Addendum 2, dated May 7, 1991, should not be waived. The sales strategy pursued by this company is based on the requirement that application software programming was a part of the data concentrator manufacturer's scope of supply. Had we anticipated that the District would allow such a significant exception, our sales strategy could have been reviewed and the project pursued by our alignment with a systems integrator such as was done between HSQ and Allen-Bradley. Based on the wording of Addendum 2 to the J-23-2 and P2-44 specification, it is very clear to this firm that the data concentrator manufacturer is responsible for the application software. It is our understanding that the Allen-Bradley company does not intend to do or take responsibility for this work. We feel strongly that this violates the requirements of .the specification. A copy of our initial objection letter is attached for reference. We appreciate the opportunity to meet with the board on July 17, 1991. Sincerely, JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORPORATION mes L. Murphy Account Executive :de Sachs Electric E EMPLOYEE O.EO /Y' . L.bn//NUmMINISCN `I .\/ {f 17177 Koala Road 619246270 `�--' Atlelanto,Calibmia 92301 61924&3771(FAX) July 5, 1991 Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Attention: Ms. Rita Brown Reference: Additional Information concerning Protest to Jobs No. J-23-2 and P2-44 Dear Ms. Brown: Sachs Electric, a bidder for the above referenced projects, and having an adversely affected direct financial interest, hereby provides additional information concerning our protest of this project. Our protest concerns the apparent acceptance to date of the HSQ and JWP bids. The following is our justification for this protest. 1. The HSQ bid is in direct violation of Specification Section 52, Page 13, Item 52-0370. This section states, "The Contractor shall provide standard control systems. A standard control system is one which is available, at time of Bid, with fully tested, field proven, software and hardware, full documentation, and prepared training classes such that no development must be done beyond system configuration and application software. Custom software and custom hardware will not be accepted. . .. .... We are confident that both the HSQ (and JWP) system fail dramatically on the following: A. Standard control systems - both HSQ and JWP utilize software as part of their "systems". This same hardware and software is also utilized by others in a similar but very different structure. These systems are not "standard", but are custom configuration to meet the hardware and software requirements of any specification, depending on the equipment required. In our estimation, these are 'custom systems" which are specifically in violation of this section. B. Fully tested/field proven/full documentation/prepared training classes AT THE TIME OF BID - We are not aware of the HSQ and JWP "systems' as having these system requirements as of bid date. Along with a custom system they will also provide custom training classes based on this hardware configuration. A "custom" system such as these cannot be classified as being "standard", "field proven and fully tested" without considerable freedom of interpretation. 2. Addendum 2, Section 52-0100, Su nary of Work, states... "The Data Concentrator Manufacturer shall certify on the shop drawing that the equipment being supplied is cmpletely compatible and shall be properly integrated to make a cmplete system and perform to the requiramnts of the Specifications." It is c n market knowledge that Allen Bradley is a hardware supplier and very rarely consents to "systems" type work. Based on this, we are certain that Allen Bradley will NYf agree to meet this important Addendum and HSQ will be in violation of the Specification. 3. Addendum 2, Section 52-0370, Standard Control Systems, states, "The data concentrator manufacturer shall provide all operational and application software associated with the system described in these Specifications. It is the responsibility of the data concentrator supplier to provide all support services associated with the Data Concentrator software. The Contractor and the data concentrator manufacturer shall certify that the software has been correctly installed and configured prior to final acceptance of the system". Once again, this all refers to direct responsibility of the data concentrator manufacturer, in this case, Allen Bradley. We firmly believe that HSQ will attempt to convince the District to waive this requirement, since Allen Bradley typically refuses this type of work. Again, HSQ will be in direct violation of the Specification. 4. Addendum 2, Section 68-0911.B.1 states, "Display a graphic display within on second of request." We are not cognizant of ANY PLC system which can meet this performance requirement with all 300 system graphics fully loaded and with a full complement of I/O. This technical requirement is most important in a plant upset condition when time is most critical and operators cannot wait for a system to clear itself. Again, HSQ will be in direct violation of the Specification. 5. Addendum 2, Section 68-0911.C, states, "Under fully loaded conditions with maximm database, do not exceed one second from the instant an operator requests a control device to change status on the appropriate data concentrator......Under fully loaded conditions, update all variables at a minimum of once per second with the capability of updating critical variables every 1/10 second." Again, we are not cognizant of ANY PLC system, regardless of architecture, which can approach this performance with all 300 system graphics and a full complement of I/O. This performance is especially needed in plant upset conditions when critical information and operator actions need implementing immediately. The system should not be the bottleneck in controlling plant processes. When a plant is in an upset condition, numerous values are changing constantly and the data concentrators, workstations and highway are experiencing maximum information traffic. This is the critical time when the operators need information quickly and can control final elements immediately. The PLC architecture is not designed to handle this type of throughout with the amount of I/O and equipment that your system contains. Again, HSQ will be in direct violation of the Specification. \/ HSQ may argue that Allen Bradley was listed as a Data Concentrator supplier. The listing of equipment manufacturers as prequaiified, typically does not mean that the specification technical and performance requirements nay be overlooked and ignored. Typically the listing of manufacturers requires that each manufacturer and bidder meet the complete technical, functional and performance requirements of the Specification. The listing of a manufacturer's name does NOT refer to a "Preapproval" of the system, hardware or software. Any other handling of this procedure completely defeats the purpose of the technical and performance porticos of the Specification. The JWP bid should have been immediately disqualified due the lack of naning one of the "named" Data Concentrator mmanufuacturers. This flagrant exception to the Bid Documents should have triggered immediate disqualification. We will not waste the time and effort beyond stating this major violation but retain our right to further cement if their system is not disqualified. We strongly urge you visit a few of HSQ's installations which utilize this "standard', "field proven", and "fully tested" control system, including this hardware and software configuration. REMEDIES We ask that the following remedies be provided: 1. The HSQ bid be disqualified as non-responsive due the numerous violations of the technical and performance sections of the specification. 2. The JWP bid also be disqualified as non-responsive primarily due to the naming of a non-prequalified System Manufacturer. 3. The project be awarded to Sachs Electric. Sachs Electric Company contends that its' position in this protest supports the best interests of the aOER, Contractors, and manufacturers by providing the LOWEST, RESPONSIVE bid. We ask that you accept our arguments and provide the Remedies stated above. It is in the best financial interest of the District that they receive a control system that meets their technical and performance requirements. Anything less would shortchange the people of your District and your staff. The performance of this control system will play a major role in the overall performance of the entire plants and the Districts' perception within your service area. A decision based on short term costs has shown to cause considerable long term operational, maintenance, financial, and commmity relation problems. Sachs Electric Company intends to persue all legal avenues in order to protect our position and financial interest in this project. Sincerely, SACHS ELECTRIC COMPANY Richard Zuroweste West= Region Manager cc: Mr. T.M. Dawes RDZ:kh © © 0 TECHNOLOGY `i V Overnight Courier 1435 Huntington Avenue via Overni 4 South San Francisco, CA 94080 May 30, 1991 ' Telephone (4151952.4310 FAX (415)952-7205 Mr. Tom Dawes County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Reference: Orange County Sanitation District No. 1 Plant 1 Control Center Instrumentation, Job No. J-23-2 i Replacement of Computerized Monitoring System . at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-44 Protest By Sachs Electric Dear Mr. Dawes: We have reviewed the protest lodged by Sachs Electric for the above-referenced project. It is our opinion that the protest is without merit. The following comments will serve to substantiate this statement: 1. HSQ Technology does manufacture standard systems utilizing purchased computers from Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) and PLCs from Allen-Bradley. The HSQ MISER System is an integrated hardware and software system which has been installed in over fifty locations, serving a variety of control system applications. Please refer to the attached standard system description and Major Projects List. The Allen-Bradley PLC-5 product line is an industry standard. The Pyramid Integrator is a data concentrator implementation of the PLC-5/250, and which HSQ has integrated .into the MISER System. Please refer to the attached Allen-Bradley Software Product Profile. HSQ has provided or is under contract to provide several systems utilizing Allen-Bradley products, as shown in the attached system descriptions. The most relevant comparison is the wastewater treatment plant project for the City of Green Bay, Wisconsin. This project utilizes DEC VAX computers and VAXstation operator stations, Allen-Bradley Pyramid Integrators, Allen-Bradley PLCSs, and MISER software. An employee-owned company and an equal opportunity employer Calllornia Contractor's Lic.378393 - © © 1 TECHNOLOGY 1435 Huntington Avenue South San Francisco. CA Page 2 940eo May 30, 1991 Telephone 14151952d310 RE: Orange County sanitation District No. I FAX (415)952.7205 Projects J-23-2 i P2-44 2. Sachs can have no factual information regarding the HSQ software offering, since the bid form provided none. The facts are that HSQ complies completely and without exception to Specification Paragraph 52-0370. No custom software is proposed beyond applications software (which is specifically required by Specification Paragraph 52-0370) . 3. The workstation proposed is the DEC VAXstation 3100 which not only meets, but exceeds the specified requirements (68- 0975.03) . Each VAXstation will be furnished with 12MB of RAM (SMB specified) ; 104MB disk (80MB specified) ; 19 inch, 256 color display with 1024 x 864 resolution (32 colors, 640 x 480 specified) ; and all other specified features, including the DEC TZ30 cartridge tape which, I do not believe, is supported by anyone but DEC. Any offering which does not include the DEC TZ30, therefore, will not meet the specifications. Sections 68-0995.01 and 68-0995. 02 specify user functionality for the operator station. The VAXstation 3100 and MISER will fully meet all specified functionality. Section 68-0995. 05 specifies diagnostic and test requirements which are met through error messages and reports from standard diagnostics provided by DEC and HSQ. Please let me know if you require any further information or assistance. Very truly yours, HSQ TECHNOLOGY J mes . MacMillan, V eg", esident - Marketing & Sales JIM/sjc Attachments: Major Projects List; Generic System Description; Pyramid Integrator Description; Project Fact Sheets - Green Bay, Henrico, San Diego, Tampa An employeeowneo company and an equal opportunity employer California Contractor's Lic.378393 Excellence m Mancged Amomonon 4400 Eci; 6 oay nmiE 304 Tucwn AZ 85711 3517 May 30, 1991 602/B81 2988 Fax CO2,/8813722 Mr.Tom Dawes County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O.Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Subject: Projects J-23-2 and P2-44 Protest of Bids Dear Mr. Dawes: We have received a copy of Sachs Electric's May 22nd letter,which protests the bids submitted by the two apparent low bidders. In response to the specific items noted,we have the following comments: 1. After further review of Specification Section 52.0370 and Addenda,we see no reason that Allen-Bradley would not meet the intent of the specification. 2. Based on the information that we have on the bids,we can find no basis for the comment that"..low bidders included custom software." 3. The information that we have on the bids also provides no basis that we can understand for the comments related to Specification Section 68.0995. This section discusses workstation requirements: Paragraph 01 details submittal requirements and radiation limits. This information will be submitted at the beginning of the project. W Paragraph 02- User functions-No indication that bidders cannot provide specified functions based on bid. Paragraph 05-Diagnostics and Test-No indication that bidders cannot provide specified functions based on bid. Based on the information that we have at this time,we are not able to determine that any bidder is not complying with the specification sections listed above. The Allen-Bradley with Pyramid Integrator,was evaluated previously and designated as an acceptable data concentrator. We believe their submitted bid meets the intent of the specSmtion and will satisfy the District's current needs and future expansion requirements,as specified. If there are any further questions, please contact us. Very truly yours, EMA Services,Inc. `� 4,� Rod W. Graupmann, P. E. oc: Jim Harris/CSDOC tfl// Project Manager Joe Hirte/EMA Tom Streed/EMA RWG/jag File 5108.030-222 10810a1/W1/05-29?91 = ' Minmopolis-SI. Paul Philadelphia Tucson Orlando ALLEN-BRADLEY 500 GOVERNMENT BUSINESS DIVISION 5lm Elm Grove Road 3122 ' ARGCKWELL INTERNATIONAL COMPANY Elm Grove.WI 53122 USA Telephone 414/796-1200 " FAX:414/796­0354 June 6, 1991 063232CA Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Ave. Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Attention: Ms. Rita J. Brown Board Secretary Subject: Orange County Sanitation District Jobs Nos. J-23-2/P2-44 Reference: Proposal by HSQ Technology The Allen-Bradley Company wishes to clarify our role and commitment with respect to Section 52-0100, paragraph D, page 52-2 and 52-0370, Page 52.13, of the subject project as amended by Addendum No. 2. In regard to those requirements Allen-Bradley affirms the following: A) The addition to Section 52-0100 requires that 'the data concentrator manufacturer shall certify on the shop drawing that the equipment being supplied is completely compatible and shall be properly integrated to make a complete system and perform to the requirements of these Specifications." Allen-Bradley has agreed to review the drawings provided by the data concentrator supplier, HSO Technology, and will provide the required certifications. B) The Addendum to Section 52-0370 states 'The data concentrator manufacturer shall provide all operation and application software associated with the system described in these Specifications.". Allen-Bradley will work closely and cooperatively with the data concentrator supplier, HSQ Technology, to provide standard commercial software which meets the project requirements. Allen-Bradley will also be conducting in-process design reviews with HSQ during performance of the Contract. C) The Addendum to Section 52-0370 further requires that the "Contractor (HSQ) and the data concentrator manufacturer (Allen-Bradley) shall certify that the software has been correctly installed and configured prior to final acceptance of the system." In order to fulfill this requirement, in addition to the in-process design reviews, Allen-Bradley will conduct a pre-certification factory witnessed test of the system at the HSQ Technology plant and thereafter provide the required certification. Helping our customers become globally competitive through control and information technologies. June 6, 1991 063232CA pagetwo The affirmations presented herein demonstrate compliance with the Project requirements. Allen-Bradley appreciates this opportunity to clarify our responsibilities and commitments on the Orange County Sanitation Project. If there are further questions or comments please contact the undersigned at the letterhead address, or by telephone at (414)796-3701. Sincerely, Donald A. Wiederecht Director, Operations and Engineering pens pr•Aerox ieiecopier ruau o— o—ai 1o•4u 410aO414VO^ iiYaeLOa+� • TECHNOLOGY 1436 HuntlnBten Avenue SWh 3en Frencleoe, CA 94080 Via Facsimile TOlophona µ1619624310 PAX (415)962-7MO June 7, 1991 Mr. Tom Dawes County sanitation Districts of orange county, California 10844 Ellie Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Referanee: Orange County sanitation District No. 1 Plant 1 Control Canter Instrumentation, Job No. J-23-2 4 Replacement of Computerized Monitoring system at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-44 Protest By sacbs Electric Dear Mr. Dawes: This letter is in response to the protest of Johnson Yokogawa Corporation with regard to the above-referenced project. In response, the attached letter from Allen-Bradley explains their contribution to the subject project. As pointed out previously, HSQ Technology has worked with Allen- Bradley in the past with great success, and are in an equal position, if not greater than, to Johnson Yokogawa with regard to our relationship with Allen-Bradley. Very truly yours, HSSQQ�TECHNOLOGY J me CCM nn Vice Pros dent - Marketing & Sales JIM/sjc Attachment a/e An employee-owned company and an eouel opieonantiv emo!ovar Callfornie Cnnfn,Mn0m I o- 170101 beryl dr+xerox ielecop ter Tutu , o— o—ni 1G:al a+onoziauo- »non,o.. . , JUN-IOb-1`Jtl1 13+1.5 FROM RL.LEN-HRRDLEY GBD TO 141595272a6 P.02 �I fbW eomof Nreu9+N[aaomaroN ALLEN-13RA13LEY No A RDCKWELL INTERNATIONAL[OMpANv ElmW QEl titan row.WI 51+22 U8.4 T1141*'fxbn14/7ea120g PAX.n1nl796.IX354 June S, 1991 063232CA Ora is County Sanitation District 10843 Ellie Ave, Fountain Valley, CA 92728.8127 Attention: Ms. Rita J. Brown Board Secretary Subject: orange County Sanitation District Jobs Nos. J-23.2/P2.44 Reference: Proposal by HSO Technology The Allen-Bradley Company wishes to clarity our role and commitment with respect to Section 52-0100, pare ra D, page 52-2 and 52-0370, Page 52.13, of the subject project as amended by Addendum No. 2. In regard to those requirements Allen-Bradley affirms the following: A) The addition to Section 52VOO requires that "the data concentrator manufacturer shall certify on the shop drawing that the equipment being supplied 1s completely campatlble and shall be.properiy integrated to make a complete$ ystem and perform to the requirements of these Specifications.' Allen-Bradley has agreed to review the drawings provided by the data II supplier, HSO Technology, and will provide the required certifications. B) The Addendum to Section 52.0370 states 'The data concentrator manufacturer shell provide all operation and application software associated with the system described in these SpecNfoat+ons.". Allen-8radleyy will work closely and cooperative y with the date concentrator supplier, HBO Technology, to provide standard commercial software which meets the project requirements. Alien-Bradley will also be conducting in-process design reviews with HSO during performance of the Contract. C) The Addendum to Section 52-0370 further requires that the "Contractor (HSO) and the data concentrator manufacturer (Allen-Bradley) shall certify rot the software has been correctly installed and conFlgurerl prior to final acceptance of the system.` In order to fulfill this requlrement, in addition to the in-process design reviews, Allen-Bradley will conduct a pre-certification factory witnessed test of the system at the HBO Technology' plant and thereafter Provide the required oertification. FniplOP Wr CIWi um become g/obdly c Pvls ry through C frol and inlorma0on f"11601091sa aeni or•naru>< ieia.opiar ,uau o-_o-aLJ1*•4& •ioaoereuo- ..... . � .aa.�e,,.,. . GJ June a 1991 083-432CA page two The etfirmatlons presented herein demonstrate compliance with the Project requirements. Allen-Bradley appreciates this opportunity to olarEy, our responsibilities and commitments on the Orange County Sanitation Project. H there are further questions or comments please contact the undersigned at the letterhead address, or by telephone at (414)796-3701. 6lncerety, Donald A. WiedereCht Director, Operations and Engineering e Allen-Bradley '] Pyramid Solutions Software Program HSQ Technology 01P MISER ' ...�.._.. _`J Software Product Profile Control and Monitoring of HSQ's MISER applications software,running under DECTM's VMS Weter/Wastewatar Operating System,offers supervisory control for water/wastewater Applications operations,process industries and electric power distribution. Operators control and monitor the system equipment using the MISERview color graphics subsystem,running in the DECwmdows (X-windows standard)environment. MISERview is an easy-to-operate,mouse-driven windowing system designed to take full advantage of the DEC VAXstationTM 3100,8-plane graphics capability and 1024 x 864 pixel screen. PC-ATTW graphics platforms are also supported through X-windows, Connectivity Capabilities Host computers,operator stations,and remote devices are interconnected through MISERnet,a LAN protocol using DECnet TM. Interface to Allen-Bradley's Data Highway network is accomplished by integrating the Pyramid IntegratorTM Information Processor into the MISERnet network as a distributed MISER host. Real-Time Operator Interface Dynamic graphic displays show real-time status changes using both numeric and graphic indicators(i.e.,blinking color coding,reverse video, changing symbols,etc.). Operators can also use the graphic displays in conjunction with a mouse or trackball,keyboard or special function keys to; a acknowledge alarms ■ configure new process variables and report variables a retrieve data for reporting,trending,and listing a generate current alarm and other summery displays a issue supervisory control commands The MISER System includes complete on-tine display and report generation facilities. The MISERdraw program provides all of the necessary utilities for constructing alphanumeric,tabular and graphic displays. The Report Definition Utility(RDU)can be run from any system CRT. Historical Data Storage MISER also includes a comprehensive historical subsystem that can be used to maintain records of equipment ran-time totals,as well as alarm and status change histories. Analog change records can be used to generate detailed trends,plots and bar chart displays. • JGt, D' -Atf uA ,at ei,pH a1 tV,v , p— J—a , 9 ,J.cc 4,p9JL rte4^ „rJru e.+.. `/ For More Informetlon For more information about HSQ Technology or MISER software,contact your local Allen-Bradley sales representative. Allen-Bradley believes the infcmlation in this publication is accurate as of its publications date. such information is subject to change without notice. Allen-Bradley is not responsible for any inadvertent errors and does not sell or support HSQ Technology software. MISER,MISERview, MISERnet and MISERdraw are all copyright products of HSQ Technology, Incorporated. DEC, VAXstation, and DECnet arc trademarks of Digital Equipment Corporation. PC-AT is a trademark of International Business Machine Corporation. Pyramid Integrator is a trademark of Allen-Bradley Company Incorporated. ALLEN•BRADLEY tier.bipw erRakwe111mevtleW am oRM werld'x lugeum hnelog A RDCKWELLNTERNATICNALCJMPA%Y corpmo,—AuernandNy menu todq''s coolengen uftnauftrW wtRNaon v'iih over 85 years of pricnul plant floor ezpeden:e.More then 13,0t o employees throughout the world busigtl,tMrlufa9fY:e end apply wide ridge of xftnl alld autemufon praducu and wpporung"wino w help our Lvatomen conanuoufly Improve 9wlity,produandty and time in maikel Tree product,utd wnlea not oily conaol Indlndual machine,but Inrtgna the menufurinng proses,while providing accent to W plant floor daw true With offices In mij or cities worldwide can he ured roeuppon decworv. Xldng avoughuut the enterytlre WORLD EUROPE/MrDDLE ASIATACIFIC CANADA LATIN AMERICA HEADQUARTERS EASTIAFRICA HEADQUARTERS HEADQUARTERS HEADQUARTERS 1201 South Second Street HEADQUARTERS AlbmBniley H.,Kocg) AlurnllruluO Canada 1201 South Second StTs: Milwaukee,'Al 02N L'SA Allon Rredley Eumpa BY United United Milwaukee,WI 532M USA U:(414)3g1.r000 AmeteMamneweB lS 2901 Omit Pyle Center 135 Durdv Suitt 7k1:(4lA)382-2000 Tvex:41311016 IA2?ACUirsoorn DHuhotrr Rnd hmbrldge.Ontano N:R nut:4311016 FAX:(414)_M2J444 The NettnlaMn O.P.O.Box 9797 5Xt FAX:(414U82-2400 Tel:UI)2975I60611 wartclui.Hong Kcng Caruda Telex:(goa)I80,12 Tl1:(952)5A39391 Rk(519A23..1810 FAX:(3U297516D= DIex.(780)64347 Telex:(069)59317 FAX:(852)51E365162 FAX(519)623.8930 Publltttlon 5000-1.13.19•Deurttber 19k M,W 1,uan .]Cn �. ♦c .n is c...... vc_ ..— .'. . . . , ...c.t.. ........ .• . TECHNOLOGY 1435 Huntlnpron Awnlla South son Frencaco. CA 94050 Via Facz;mile Telephone (415)9524310 FAX (415)952.720e June 1 , 1991 Mr. Tom Dawes County sanitation Districts of orange County, California 1C044 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Raferencel orange County sanitation District No, i Plant i Control Canter Instrumentation, Job No. J-23-2 i Replacement of Computerised Monitoring System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-44 Protest By Sachs Electric Dear N'x. Dawes: HSQ Technology has reviewed the latest allegations of Sachs Electric and Westinghouse Electric. The two letters are essentially the same. The following comments apply: 1. They allege that the HSQ system will not meet the response time specified under Section 68-9011B and C, for operator actions. The allegation is false. HSQ will meet the specified requirements without exception. 2. They also allege that the system proposed by HSQ will not be able to meet the required time synchronization of lms resolution, per paragraph 68-0911F. All clocks within the system will maintain a resolution of at least Ins. HSQ takes no exception to the specification. 3. They allege that we do not meet Section 52-0370 regarding responsibility for operational and application software. They also claim that we (HSQ) are not a prequalified supplier of standard software. As to this latter point, there is no requirement for software system prequali- fication. With regard to the former point, please refer to the attached letter from the Allen-Bradley company. An* cvovae neo company and an eoual onpomnh-employer Covornia Conlrecmre Lie 37111343 i1 A. vA G G.a. • v r � ♦. r � .vJalLv• Iiw.LCJ:p.rw J TECHNOLOGY 1436 Xunun9lon Avows South San Frsuclsco, CA 24080 Tolophona (4161952.4310 Page 2 FAX (415)952.7206 June 6, 1991 RE. Protest By snobs ilaotria orange County saaitation District No. 1 Job NO. J-23-2 i Job No. P2-44 4 . They allege that the equipment will not meet paragraph 68- 0911E, with regard to component failure. This is false. 5. They allege that the equipment will not meet paragraph 68- 0980.04 regarding diagnostics. This is false. In summary, I repeat the position stated in my previous letter on this subject. These protests are entirely without merit. The protestors are making irresponsible allegations based on conjecture. There is no factual information available to them on which to base these claims. Why a company such as Westinghouse would demean themselves to such an extent is beyond belief. Please let me know if we can provide any further information. Very truly yours, HHSj///0 TECHNOLOGY Jamesn" I.My!:Millan, Vice President - Marketing & Sales JIM/s j c Enclosure a/e An amnioyerowcad camosw a^e en eeue 0000•tu^N amninve• (`cmnmi.r^^....r ...... JUN 26 '91 04:42PP1 LMH, iM Ence4ence!n Managed Auromc,on 4400 Eco 5,00dwov _'cue 304 Tvcaav, AZ 8 5711-35 1 7 602/881 2988 Faz602/881.3722 June 25, 1991 Mr.Tom Dawes County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728.8127 Subject: Projects J-23-1 and P2-44 Protest of Bids Sachs letter of 06/04/91 Johnson Yokagawa letter of 06/04/91 Westinghouse letter of 06/05/91 Dear Mr. Dawes: We have received copies of the above letters and have the following conunenu. 1. Sachs'letter of June 4, 1991. a. The HSQ/Allen-Bradlev bid did not take exception to any specified items. b. There is no indication from the submitted bid that HSQ/Allcn•Bmdley has deviated from the Specifications. 2. Johnson Yokagawa's letter of June 4, 1991. a. The HSO/Allen-Bradley bid did not take exception to any specified items. 3. Westinghouse's letter of June 5, 1991. a. The HSQ/Allen-Bradley bid did not take exception to any specified items. Each letter alleges that HSQ/Allen-Bradley cannot meet the specification requirements based on previous experience or other information that the protesters may have.. Bid documents received from HSQ/Allen-Bradley do not take exception to any specified item, nor do they indicate any deviation from the specification, Rejecting or disqualifying the HSQ/Allen-Bradley bid based an the information currently available does not seem reasonable. %006,13/1/06254I mnr opolsSl. Pcul Philadelahc Tuacn Orlando J JIY CC "ll l'Ja:4J11'I U'h, i1N, r .� Mr.Tom Dawes "- June 2.5. 1991 Page 2 We recommend that the Districts request written assurance from HSQ/Allen-Bradley that they do indeed meet the specified requirements. Given this further commitment, we me no basis for not awarding them the contract Please call me at(612) 639-5600 if you have any questions Very truly yours, EMA Services,Inc Vice President RWG/jag m: Jim Harris/CSDOC Ice Hirte/EMA Tom Streed/EMA File S 108.030-222 taesws/t/�uat RESOLUTION NO. 91-126 AWARDING JOB NOS. J-23-2 AND P2-44 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PLANT NO. 1 CONTROL CENTER INSTRUMENTATION, JOB NO. J-23-2, AND REPLACEMENT OF COMPUTERIZED MONITORING SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-44 t f f f f f f i t t i f f i i The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the proposed construction contract is for a project which is a portion of the previously-approved 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The project is to be constructed as per the Master Plan approval. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and Section 15090 of the Districts' Guidelines, the Program Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan covering this project was approved by the Boards of Directors on July 19, 1989; and, Section 2. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Director of Engineering that award of contract be made to HSQ Technology for Plant No. 1 Control Center Instrumentation, Job No. J-23-2, and Replacement of Computerized Monitoring System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-44, and bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That the contract for Plant No. 1 Control Center Instrumentation, Jab No. J-23-2, and Replacement of Computerized Monitoring System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-44, be awarded to HSQ Technology, in the total amount of $3,752,000.00 in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel ; and, Section 5. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held July 17, 1991. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS W ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA May 21, 1991 1DOXXELLiSAVENUE 11:00 a.m. PO BOx 8127 2 ADDENDA FOUNTAIN VAUEV.uuroRNiA 2926.8127 ti• T I.IBS2.2An B I D T A B U L A T I O N S H E E T JOB NO. J-23-2 and P2-44 PROJECT TITLE Plant No. 1 Control Center Instrumentation, Job No. J-23-2, and Replacement of Computerized Monitoring System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-44 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Furnish and install computerized monitoring system at both plants. BUDGET J-23-2:$ 1,000,000.00 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $6,000,000.00 AMOUNTS P2-44: $ 4,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID -------------------- 1. HSQ Technology, South San Francisco, CA $3,752,000.00 2. JWP Controls, Concord, CA $3,843,000.00* 3. Sachs Electric Company, Adelanto, CA $5,096,500.00 4. Johnson Yokogawa Corp. , Carrollton, TX $5,152,358.00 *Non-responsive. Quoted other than prequalified equipment. I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I , therefore, recommend award to HSQ Technology of South San Francisco, California in the bid amount of $3,752,000.00 as the lowest and best bid. ZoM. Dawes Director of Engineering .r RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS JULY 17, 1991 - 7:30 P.M. n F FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5129191 PACE 1 REPORT NUMBLY A►43 L DUST AIMSA NITAT 061 OLSIBI EIS_OF-DR ATE 06OONTY.________.___.._______.___. _ CLAIMS NE PAID 06/OS/93 POSTING GATE D6/OS/91 WIGRAtl7..NQ....._.__....._... .... ......_..VEMDDR.__.-___..__._-_._ _ASaUSI- -__-DLSCRIEII ON I14703 AT A 7 $1.192.11 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICE ..._111709.._.....___ . LINCOLN. CARPETS 6_.ItliLRI QflS._.._.—__—�105.11.-___-_—____BUILDING.MATERIALS___ 114705 AIK PRODUCTS 6 CHEMICAL IN $16.174.00 OAK AGREEMENT-OEY GBN. SYST. H.O.8-9-89 114706 ALPHAGAZ $451.41 SPECIALTY GASES _1147.17___..__.AWtlItlUN_PBEGISI Otl 61.91302_ _9EFUMD-USER_PEB._OUREPAYNeum 114708 AMERICAN FLEET PARTS $44.60 TRUCK PARTS 114709 AMERICAN MEDIA INC 1207.95 VIDEO RENTAL _114730_ . .. _.._...ARAMEIH GENERAL. N9SPI7AL__.._...____._ ..___.__._iBai9.1.15-_.___-_.. ._........REFUND USER_EEE..OVERPAYMENT__ ITT ANAHEIM MEDICAL ARTS SLOG $1,951.28 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT z 114712 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO $595.72 BUILDING MATERIALS p -114..713-___.. PLABE__P__ANDERSON_ _— _$620.35_ _-__SRAVSLs_MEBTIMG-EEPEN$E D 114714 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $4.311.94 NOTICES A ADS 114715 ARENS INDUSTRIES INC $544.34 INSTRUMENT PARTS ARM_.iECMNQLQ61E5__._____...._.__—____66ES.OB__.-___-_.__COMPHTEA90FTNABSSSR][ICEs ITI 114717 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING $2.374.60 .SOIL TESTING H.0.4-11-90 $ 1I4718 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $59•970.94 RESIDUALS REMOVALS M.0.7-13-88 2 _114714..._._.__. _..BAOC OCR-DISPLAY-PRODUCTS. Itl33aS!l..19 _ _REFUND-USER_FEZ�Mf ...YNENT CJ 114720 BACNFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE $64.00 BACKFLON TESTING 114721 BAKER PLYWOOD CO INC $1.691.33 BUILDING MATERIALS ..119722._._. .____.BALZLOS_7GQL COATIVG______._ $31A.69 __. HeeutlELU3BLFES�VEePAYMExm f-' 114723 BARBARY COAST CABARET $151.10 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT C3 114724 BARTER DIAGNOSTICS INC 92.772.66 LAB SUPPLIES _.BESt_YESTERtl 1NN_._.__..__ fP._92 RRMNG,_DaRR FIR MIRRPAVNRNT 114726 ROBERT BILOTT1 SI.1DO.00 LIABILITY CLAIM 114727 BOOT BARN $101.07 SAFETY SHOES r __111720.___ _... __DRENNERrf IEDLER- L._.ASSOC- $15.63—.___._tlECMANICAL_PAHTS_-- 114729 INC INC $210.36 INSTRUMENT REPAIR t7 114730 BROWN S CALDWELL $175.00 LAB SERVICES Cn -BRDYN_.L_CALDYELL.CQNSULTIMS $Sl.A22.S7 RdGIHEeBING�68YICes_Y-19�It-35.o2-39 -i 114732 STEVE BUBALO CONSTRUCTION CO $1.757.159.19 CONSTRUCTION 2-26-3,2-28.2-29 114733 BUDGET INN $674.15 REFUND USER. FEE OVERPAYMENT .-I _1lRi3L........ .. .. BUILOCK 5_..EMPORIUM _..._. 114735 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE $75.96 PUBLICATION Ln 114736 GARY 6 $TREED $410.34 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 114730 7 615.56 __TSAINING_SBGISTSSTIQN ..-. 114739 CS PAC COMPANY $353.54 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 114739 CAL-PAC INC ..HCO INC 1311.54 CHEMICALS ._114741..._. ._ ._ CALIFOR IN .... __.AT ..... ., _._._.___._._... $111.1!__-.__._. INSTSUNBAGREEMPLISS_—._ 114742 CANNON NIA AUTOMATIC GAT[ f2$168.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 114742 CANNON EQUIPMENT WEST INC f/B8.o0 REFUND USER FEB OVERPAYMENT JOHN . CAROLLQ.. ENGINEERS....... __.. $213.131.97ENGINEERIN"ERVICES_PL_34.P1-20.P1-11_ 114744 CENTRE BRANDS INC. $1.153.10 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 114745 CENTURY SAFETY 14ST A SUPP $56.08 SAFETY SUPPLIES .119796_........,. . ._.CHEVRON REA._INC 114747 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $1,251.30 FITTINGS 114740 COMPUTER BAY $154.36 COMPUTER SOVYWARE D F+ x a a FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/29/91 FARE 2 N REPORT NUMBER AP43 a __.-_ .. ._. .... . .._..... .__.._ ._......_.._.._... _..._ COUNTY .SANITATION. 5/STRILiS_OF_DRAEE.COUNTY _...____._..__.__.____— CLAIMS PAID 06/05/91 POSTING DATE 0616/03/91 . _.__._..DESCALPT ON____ 164749 CONARD-S PHOTOGRAPHY 1223.65 PHOTO SERVICES .114TS0_._. . __.CONNELL.. BN._ PARTS_..L_. DIY. __..__. ___—_...__._.f 330.64-..._.. .._..____.. _ TRUCX.PARTS_. __.__..____.—__ 114751 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $9.296.65 ELECTRIC PARTS 114752 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC S4.359.70 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES __111153_.__...._. CRANE_ VE log-tone- _.3159.83—_ -.-_ BUILDING.NATERIALB_. 114754 CA EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 662.70 REFUND USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT 114755 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $160.00 ANNEXATION PROCESSING FEE a 114756. .__. DAILY PILOT __._.____. ..____._156.00_-___-___ _ __ NOTICESB T 114757 DAMES S MOORE $31.711.31 CONSULTING BEAU. - EARTHQUAKE PRBPARSONSSS Z 114758 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE A1.467.59 TIRES p SIlI54__... _ ._. .DATAPRO_.RESEARCM.._L OR2____._ ..______ _Ala O4B.O0-__...__._____.._.__PUBLICATIONS_- a 114765 GLEN E DAVIDSON f90.61 TRAINING EXPENSE �--i 214761 ALBERT V DAVIES INC $40,920.07 CONSTRUCTION 7-13 --f _.1147A2__— ._. DEPT__DE.._f ISM... ...GAXE__..____ __f220.00.__.. _._ ___. APPLICBTION_ESER m 114763 DEZURIK AND/OR CS CO $4,123.02 VALVS PARTS 3 114764 DOR400 ENTERPRISES INC R71.409.96 PLANT MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS Z DOVER.ZLEVATOR.COMPANY.___.___. _295.00—_._. -_.-_ SERVSCE_AGREKHENT _ O 114766 DUNKEL BROS MACH MOVING $1.590.52 SPACE RENTAL J-19A 114767 DUNN EDWARDS CORP $48.78 PAINT SUPPLIES 21a221.11 ______VAL E 214769 EASTMAN INC $2.66D.89 OFFICE SUPPLIES 124770 EBERHARD EQUIPMENT $68.37 TRUCK PARTS 1 .__ELECIRON_PLAIIHfi11___ 6115.2E—..-- BRAUNO_118ER_FSE_.OSB... ae 114772 ENCHANTER INC 17.000.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.3-14-90 r 114773 ENGINEERS SALES-SERVICE CO $40.22 PUMP PARTS JOHN_5.._F.ALKENSTEIH�.__._ 31.20].00--.— -.___CONSTEUCTION_SERVICES-J-1-4 114775 FAX PRESS $53.65 OFFICE SUPPLIES p 114776 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP $130.75 AIR FREIGHT -SUPPLY CO____—___—_ 154Ad. CHTARTHATIOH PARTS _ 11477E FISCHER S PORTER CD $16.026.46 CHLORINATION PARTS �y 114770 FLO-SYSTEMS 11.969.65 PUMP PARTS FLUID... HANDLING.. SYSTEMS . _ ._ - -_ __ 11i275.24. ._ __PUMP_FARTS___— .._ 114781 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY 14.338.48 WATER USE 4 114762 FOXBORO CO / NAG SYSTEMS $2,902.05 VALVES Cm _.114783—. ._._ ._f.ULLERI ON-FOODS .___.__._._ ____.____- 131L26 RErUMI -USSSSS5.OVERPAYMENT - 114784 GNF SOUND INC S297.04 COMMUNICATIONS SUPPLIES 114785 GANAHL LUMBER CO $71.32 HARDWARE/LUMBER .. d6-- TILEPMONH.ERRVICES—_-.- 1147B7 GEORGE LEECH S ASSOCIATES $1.199.96 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 1147Se 6IERLICH.MITCHELL INC $14.757.35 MECHANICAL PARTS NN_.GR61NGEB_...INC __—._—_ &saws_ MRTsa 114790 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS S1.621.89 FILM 114791 DON GREEN S ASSOCIATES S24.947.50 SURVEYING SERVICES RES 88-72 TYPE 4.0RAP.MI.CR_------__-__. _621.76- _-PRINTING 114793 HACH COMPANY f1.676.42 LAB SUPPLIES 114794 HALVORSEN-STRIP SHOPPING CNT SIS3.54 REFUND USSR FAR OVERPAYMENT ri FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST MORNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5129/91 PAGE 0 W REPORT NUMBED Avq coCNTY LAI S F430 IDN_PI$1p14I$_QE_DDARQE_EQ05191..__.. CLAIMS PAID 16/05/91 IOSTIN6 DATE 06/OS/91 WARRANT NO._.__ .. .... _- ... .-_ .....VENDO_R 11179E HARBOR INN TRAVELOOGE $2,165.27 REFUND USSR FEZ OVERPAYMENT 114796 MATCH 6 KIRK INC 61124 B MECHANICAL-PARTS.--,,,-__,-_.___ _ 114797- PL HANN CO -INC - _ - - - - ------- $1.598.76 - _ - -FILTERS 114796 MEWLETT PACKARD COMPANY $205.42 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 214799 _ HORIZON MI6X-REACH $9A13 80 J..T. XORYATN { _SO _ .11 ,,-TRUE . S2,900.00 —.._ CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, J-7-4 114001 MOUSE OF BATTERIES $152.04 BATTERIBS n -114002 _,..- MOWELL AVENUE _ ENTERPRISES ,._____-.__-__,__al}311.51 _- __,__ _. _ ,- RBFUNO U86,R. FEE HT m ii4aas Ri HUSHES DO INC $236.26 PAINT SUPPLIES 114804 RODNEY HUNT CO $14.056.61 PUMP PARTS a „114805 . __ HUNTINGTON BEACH.__RU$QER_ST�.- 1 I16O6 NUNTiN6 TON SUPPLY 67B3.B4 HARDWARE 114807 HYOPOTEK INC S8.139.56 OIL -11440$.-..-__..._ _.INQ .. I NDUSTRI_C S..._ .. ..________{¢10eZi—____.-._.__..-QLBCTRIC`SUPPLIE$._-.-_-_ m 111609 ITT CANNON ELECTRIC f9N.S0 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT g 114910 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $33.791.11 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.4-11-90 _ --114811 AjRNUEST ENVIRONMENTAL_CQA �109IE n__ _-----MECHANICAL CJ 1i4812 MOUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $920.05 CONNECTORS 114013 INGRAM PAPER $2.911.51 OFFICE SUPPLIES _11e814 ,, , , -..INTERNATION46_. EN$INE}E__N45NJ—.— —S3$}JL _-- __—Lrory9uTEA PARTS____--._—_— ~O 114519 YILUAM M JACKSON $56.30 MEETING S%PBN86 114816 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SU►/ $812.68 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES AF„ .JONNSQN. SQMP.ANT_.._. _-_-_.__- S2R2.27 __LAB SUPPLIES 114als KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITAL $9.315.82 REFUND USER P66 OVERPAYMENT 114819 KALLEEN.S COMPUTER PRODUCTS S710.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES r .RAWER .COMPAN I', __ 2913.44_-__-.-_--BVILOI,NG.MATERIALS 114821 THE NEITH COMPANIES $1,179.80 BMGINEBRINC SERVICES 5-36 C 114022 KING BEARING INC $2.545.09 MACHINE SUPPLIES N11A0R]__.-..___.­A IRS T,_PUMP_.A,_MAC NINE.-.Y QRR B-- $5,297.85 PUMP PARTS 1 114624 MARTIN BORDICK Sp 22.063.22 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 14-1-2, I-9 A 114B29 LAB SUPPORT S2.162.51 TEMPORARY SERVICES 71482E LAUNDRALANQ. OF QRAREE._..........._...___ $252-9—__-_---. REFUND_USBR-TEE OUR PATH m 114627 LAUNDRO RAT $100.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 4 114920 LE ROY CRANDALL L ASSOC $220.00 GEMECHNICAL SERVICES - DIGESTERS I PLT 2 En _11482? _ . _ LIEDEPT_ASSOCIATES . 2F„ 98,l12,00 -_-INST,RUMENT_PART _ Him JOHN LISFE PUMPS INC 6S1l.RT PUMP PARTS 314831 LOCAL AGENCY 9250.00 LAFCO ANNEX PROCESSING FEE 114832-._ _ COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES . }TQ32Q PURCUASE.-AGIISEEMNT,-__,_________--__ L14833 MPS - - $968.23 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 114634 MACOONALD-S7EPMEMS LAB $480.00 TEST EQUIPMENT 1I4 ESE RACOMCO,_____ _tlli.2A _86AVIC8-AGR66HBNT 11165E M161C CARPET M01[L 61.515.65 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMBNT - 114837 MAGIC LAMP MOTEL SS28.23 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT MARV4C _ ELECTRUK NS �L,L•I A_--_ - IN__ ETRUM6RT_BURIM-8 _ 114839 MATT - CHLOR INC 1927.69 CHLORINATION PARTS 114840 SOUTH STAR 619.69 PHOTO SBRVICBS ri w D I FUND NO 9199 - JT DIET WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/29/91 PAGE 9 NUM r REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06105/91 POSTING DATE 06/45/9 1 Almr __-DESCRIPTIO1L_.____ _ 214841 MCKENNA ENOR f EQUIP $283.09 PUMP PARTS 114842_____ _.RCKINLEj JACK_____-.-__. 114843 NCMASTER-CARS SUPPLY . CO $72.79 OFFICE SUPPLIES 114844 MECHANICAL DRIVE SYSTEMS 1S6.14 INSTRUMENT PARTS 114845N€S._0-HRARY_______-_-_.__.-. _$19 .929.14____ _MECHAHICAL..PARTS_ -. 114846 CROMPTON METERMASTER INC S248.68 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 114847 WINO MICROGRAPHICS $37.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES D 114849 _ MISCO, -17Y0.59 __.__._ OFFICE- SUPPLIES--a) 114850 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES l959.22 HARDWARE Z 114850 MITCMELL INTERNATIONAL INC lS9.22 PUBLICATION C7 114851__. __ ___JAMES __gUMT IC"ONTG ERNS[RQC714N.____�L$37.929.fi0.____-.___-ENGINEERINGN_19v1_-2_- D 214953 JARES M CELLULAR t37$235.05 ENGINEERING TELEPHONE I IIB53 NOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICES f235.05 CELLULAR TBLEPIIONE SERVICES NEAL OR SL.MESTM INSTER�ARR--_-. j@$498.03-__ LETTER ENT SUPPLIES=1990 SERIES A f7l 314856 HEAL SUPPLY NE CO f496.05 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 3 11185E CITY OF NEVPORT BEACH f6.05 HATER U36 _111857 _.. _. _CNSRLE£_NICNOLS_ A621.81 TpgygL3JIESTIHFigXP_57788 ZO 114858 NORTH SUPPLY $425.83 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT _ 114059 NORTHWEST MOTOR WELDING INC 564.19 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT _11486401_ CQRPQR Sj1QN_________-_._____E i2n153.25 _.LA@54QEPlLBNT114.1-9-91___ I--' 114861 U-BRIEN ENERGY SYSTEMS 916.346.49 INTERIM POWER GENES. SYST. M.0.3-8-89 ED 114862 ON SYSTEMS CO 223.662.91 CHLORINE H.0.2-14-90 i _114861. 4LTNPIE_SllER1EBL_C9RPANr _ A73A.I8 CHEMICALS 114664 ON-LINE ELECTRONICS SI01.17 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES D 114865 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPL $94.64 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES r _ 114866_._ __... QRAND[-COUN7C,SiNCNICAL_C4__._ _ 14.D73.9L _ _HTPROCH49RjE-AOID r - 114067 ORANGE VALVE f FITTING CO. f1.747.48 VALVES/FITTINGS tp I14068 OXYGEN SERVICE S1.861.05 SPECIALTY GABES COUNTY_OF_ oRPMGE.J�A1R€1IRP4_- Au.z95AQ CQNnR7OTlQg1<ASENExx 114070 CSDOC SELF-FUNDED MEDICAL I f100.00D.00 PREMIUM ADVANCE 114671 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT S2015.16 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FUND _114872__. _ COUNTY. OF.-ORANGE .�.ENA J14S QOQ.40 PERMITS Eb 114577 PCL PACKAGING S379.50 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT N114874 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY 91,143.34 PUMP PARTS _114875 PACIFIC__N_OB s32j.Q4 TRAILER MUSLIM IC 114876 PACIF PARTS i1.591.80 INSTRUMENT PARTS 114877 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO $531.11 SAFETY SUPPLIES 11487B __,____ ___PACIFlt_gt 1., HTLLR_CRClECR_Q1 - 21.23-__ -_.__RHFlUGD_USER_FSE OVERPAYMENT 1/4879 PACIFIC BELL $936.67 TELEPHONE SSERVICES 114880 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $202.82 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS PEERLESS_ _YIP.1N6__MAjERIALS_L. S1Q16 95_ _JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 114BB2 P17NEY BONES S191.9D POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 114883 POLYMETRICS. INC. f459.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 114884 _...... .__ PQLYPURE _INC - _315,975..19 ._ CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-87 _ 114885' POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO S120.98 ELECTRIC PARTS 114886 PRECISION CONTROLS INC S999.77 MECHANICAL PARTS n N FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5129191 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP\S COCLAI_.SANI TAT.0610519T11CIS_ING DATE[. "CQ 05/9____.._._--______ CLAIMS P\ID D6/03/9l POSTING DATE 06/OS/9l WAR a ART-N0, YBRQ4B A4O➢Ni JIESCAIPIIDN— - 114087 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $56.90 ICE _114888: .._ __ TNI PROJECT.SQLV{I4N G..EQ..___-.___--_—____15.0lDJ0__._—____—__INSTRUMENTATION.IHSESCTION1Lp,11-8-00 111989 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS 1111.9911.24 ELECTRIC MOTORS 114890 RADIO SNACK $1.559.43 RADIO SUPPLIES __1ISY1__ PSCC SQALa_HEDLIMG.—aT _._ s9AD.00 PAVED_.AREA-3WSEEIHG 114892 RA REED ELECTRIC $394.99 MOTOR REPAIR 114893 REEVES REF/E METATE INC $31.54 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT ---__TBMPORARY_SSRYICSS—..__— 'n 114999 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO f2.032.E1 PLUIOIING SUPPLIES m 2 114096 J R ROBERTS CORP 624.384.60 CONSTRUCTION J-23-1 C _11489L___.._..__ROTE-RQDTIUNILOYIEE.DILBRB1 Na $149.44 __ _INSTRUNG_38RARTSS n 1149 JOSEMOU N7/UNILRS .552.40 INSTRUMENT PARTS 114699 J03EPN 7 RTERSON f SON IN f2.332.4E HARDWARE y _1119Q0__... ___,_SAFETi DKLEEN .SOAP._._._.__.__._ EL9.SB__.__—_— - _ PARTS-CLEANER---.--- m 114901 SAFETY SUPPLY OF AMERICA 9931.27 SAFETY SUPPLIES 3 114902 - SANTA FE SAG CO $211.62 BUILDING MATERIALS Z _114903.__._ _SANK A. C7 114904 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES INC fSS7.37 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 114905 SEA COAST DESIGNS $1.639.72 OFFICE FURNITURE �+ _111206 ____. - _.CITY _➢F.._SEAL_. BEACH.______ 114907 SEARS ROEBUCK f CO $78.22 TRUCK PARTS 114908 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $9,119.99 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 1 _119202.._.____ __SLIDE_RASTER_.__ 2143.3, PHBSENTATION_AIDS D 114910 SMITH-EMERY CO $6,351.00. SOIL TESTING M.C.6-I4-89 r 114911 SOFA FACTORY INC f70.06 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT F- 111912..__ _. . . CONPUSA.- INC. 114913 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO $213.046.49 POWER O 114914 30 CAL GAS CO $13.322.51 NATURAL GAS " _ 11f415-__ ___.SOUTHERN__000NTI CS__D1L_.CD__ —L1A.92D.A9 DIB8EL-ML.— n 114916 SOUTHWEST DIVERSIFIED INC f1.713.B1 SETTING USSR ]FAR OVERPAYMENT .'O 114911 SOUVENIR PHOTO f14.92 PHOTO 58RVIC88 n _..11491e_ __._ . - . ._STAR LQI__I4C ._..________._. 4.61. _—_- --I 114920 STAR TOOL f SUPPLY CO S11 95.46 RTCOLS EFUND � 11992E STEVENS METAL FINISHING ff9S.16 RBFVND USER P86 OVBRPAYNBM'P 114922 4 SUPELCOROVERtl.$195ANITORIAL 114923 SUPER CONTINENTAL PRODUCTS TOOL .157.64 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES I1f92] ACCQ IEN7AL AIR TOOL INC 35.1E T•6f TOOLS _114929.._._ . _ ACCQ ASSOCIATES _.. _.. __. _ N90.2� OFEISE REPAEMB 11f925 TCM ASSOCIATES 4790.9E LIKE SUPPLIES 114926 TRY INFORMATION SERVICES fI.573.86 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT _1192 ._ _ TA Y R ELECTRONICS 14929 TAYLOR-DUNK MIG COMPANY $3422..422 __.ELRBECSTORRTIC_CART RETB 124929 TATLOR INDUSTRIAL SOFTWARE f1.300.0E COMPUTER SOFTWARE - .11A910._.._- . _. ..TEMRAR_. COMPANY.. . __—_. 4112.11--____-__GAB_SUEELIES- - 114931 THLO-TELLO-BUSCM INC $979.89 CABLE 214932 THOMAS FISH COMPANY f2Si.00 LAB SUPPLIES 3� VT D 1 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST YORKIN6 CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/29/91 PAGE 6 O] i REPORT NUOBEi AP 43 —__LOI_SAYi.I►IlO Y_D113LICIS_ A EECT_ CLAIMS PAID 96/95/91 POSTING DATE _6/90/91 , WARRANT_tl0. _______—_._.____VENDOR._..__._—__---. _ IMm..T _ __._11ESCRIRTION- 114933 THOMASON MECHANICAL COOP f1.664.90 FITTINGS 114934__ - _. THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL.SUPPLT_.._______..______._f36f d9--_..-.____.____. MARDYAOE _. 114935 THORPE INSULATION $69.5? BUILDING MATERIALS 114936 TIME MOTION TOOLS $139.54 COMPUTER PARTS -_ 114937-___ -IONY!S.- LUCK .4__SAEE__$EAU ICE --- ----i1.71f.34----.--__- ---LOCK-REPAIRS.-. -_ 114538 TRANSMATION INC 9213.63 PUMP PART 114939 TRAVEL TRAVEL f186.80 TRAVEL SERVICES M.O.6-13-90 n 114940 __ _. . __ NO _TRERICE_--CO ---- __. ...__._..._.. -_-__-3216./9._____ __-__. -_.-_ .___INSTRUNE .SUPPLIES--.-__. G-1 114941 IS TRIPP fO75.89 WINDOW CLEANING 114942 TRUCK 6 AUTO SUPPLY INC $525.96 TRUCK PARTS z _114943_ . J6__TNCKER--I SOtl-1YL--_____- _-5654.1E--- INST811N6NT.SUPPLIES G n 114944 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $225.93 PARCEL SERVICES _ 114945 VAR SCIENTIFIC f1.032.74 LAB 9UPPLIBS m _. 11494E ____._-___ROSEMOUNT TIES ._SUPPLY_-_CO-__.__ .__�5.353.72-----_-- PSUMBING_SUPPLILI fTl 114948 V401ANUAN INC $2,622.36 MECNANICALPLI SUPPLIES 3 114949 TIRING AN ALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS SA 622.3E LAB SUPPLIES 1149R9__-_-.._WEATHE__ I SOU MIND INSTRUMENTS .------ —__i $156.51--- ��-_--SAFETY_SUPPLIES- � 114951 VEST 1 YTER TERMINALS $180.00 SAFETY SUPPLIMACHINE 114951 PEST COAST S CHERI CA INC f180.00 OFFICE MACHINE REPAIR 114952 ..... ._.__6ESTERN.STATESDRUFF C1L--SUPPL T-_ 951.f0--.-------.LEGATIC_SOIA_M-D-0-8-90.. C3 114954 AERRKE 1 WOODRUFF f$3.794.75 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.30-30-90 114954 XEROX CORP f3.794.75 COPIER LEASES 1 _.114955_- _.. -_EVERETT TAROLEI' CO_________. •605.86 VALVE_-- 114956 EY CRETT H TORK CO ------6 MECHANICAL PARTS r r . _ - - --- -- -- ----- ----- ------------- -------- - ----------_. TOTAL CLA IDS ►AtD 06/OS/9l . f4a 50b 103.39 _..-SUMMARY- AMOUNP c- - #2 OPER FUND 91 --1 #2 OP6R FUND $26771,220.88 #2 CAP FAC FUND $1,7]1,"A 00 Cn __43..OPER_FUND_ _ -.._..- _ .___ ..-__._ __.-_-__.-�$7,77n 1. _ #5 OPER FUND $1,179.12 80 #5 CAP FAC FUND i1,179.80 --#6 OPEN FUND 1 7 OPER FUND $27,393.87 #7 CAP FAC FUND - 549,478470.25 ._ ._#Il-OPER.FUND_ . . .. __. _. _. _.__ ._.. __-.__ #13 OPER FUND f290.49 014 OPER FUND $4.451.65 -._#14 CAP FAC FUND. - - -..- . _.-_ - _._...._ ._._._..-___-.f1.196,77L9i__._._-.___-_.______-_ _. _ #566 OPER FUND $2,732.67 #667 OPER FUND $3,981.10 .._._#7614.OPBR FUND 902_b7- JT OPER FUND $542,500.44 - CORF $522,264.39 3? _.. SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS -- -- ------------- 6113.1265E - TING CAPITAL O,430.37 v =!vvzve=v / 1 FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST VOPKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6113191 PAGE 1 F REPORT NUMBER 4P41 -. _. _ _.__-- _._ .._£4PNTY CLAIMSAPAID INN DISTE ICTSPOS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 16/19/91 POSTING DATE 06/19/9l _ VAR H ANT.NQ.._._._____ VEHQOR_ .-..__ ._ _._J9OUNT_. . _. ._ DESCRIPTION 114966 'AEC ENERGY BOOKS f41T.40 PUBLICATION __Rl9947____ -_ ... _ . . i60/.90 PUMP VIBRATION TESTING ._ _. ._ ._..._.. 11498E ADAMSON UNIFORM L EQUIP S3.951.11 LAB SUPPLIES 114989 THE ADVANCE GROUP $77.84 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES __l19490__.._-_APYBS9C.4BETRUSI9BS_1BC.. _. _.. . _ - $1.176.662.40 CONSTRUCTION P1-34T2.6.3. 114991 AIR COLD SUPPLY INC 346.22 AIR CONDITIONING PARTS 114992 AIR PRODUCTS L CHEMICAL IN S16.IF4.00 06M AREEMENT-OKY GEN SYBT M.0.0-9-89 n IIA991 _ .. ._, ALHAMBRA_FOVUPRI__CO__L12 _ .. S9.452.50 MANHOLE COVERS T 214994 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT $24.25 ASPHALT Z 114995 AMERICAN CABLING A COMM $222.60 COMMUNICATIONS SUPPLIES rj _ ..514996__________.ROBSC_IHC_fL4H A ERICAIL.SEALS._._. .. _._ $2.255.35. FITTINGS _ n 114998 AMERICAN VATER WORKS NSTR ASSOC. 255.00 PUBLICATION 11499E AMAMEIM SENOR CONSTRUCTION UC - f1$797.25 EMERGENCY TRAVEL REPAIRS EXPENS DIET 5 _ /1A999 . ___ _ .GLARE P ANQEPSOH___.__- . __. ... _ _. .. . _. _ ;707.25 MEETING 6 TRAVEL EEP_6_N_S_B_8 m 115000 ANINTER - DISTRIBUTION S832•D2 COMPUTER PARTS 3 115001 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $1.253.80 NOTICES 6 ADS Z ._.115002.,____._.__.ARA7£R�E_RYLEE�_14C _ _ _ 41.552.89 _ UNIFORM RENTALS_ 115063 ARIZONA INSTRUMENTS CORP f1.952.25 METER 115904 ASSOC. ADNINIS. 8 CDNSULTANTS $50.00 MEDICAL CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR ._..115045 _ DENIAL_J_NSVH.AMCESVLLL _ _ f12.00. _. CONSULTING SERVICES - DENTAL_ MS F- 115006 AREA $1.095.90 TRAINING REGISTRATION 115007 AUTOCON INDUSTRIES INC 52027.29 ELECTRIC PARTS __. 115O9B___ FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE -.S1L2.9B3.20___.__ _ __RESIDUALS REMOVAL Ny0.7-13-88 115010 BANK IA BAL UT t1$969.25 TEMPORARY 38RVICEB I13010 BANK OF AXER ICA f969.25 BANK CARTS _ __33.380.00 _ CONSTRUCTION PI-34-263�_J-21_. _ .. .. .__ ES 115413 BASHAT f1$595.00 DEFERRED CO SBRVICRI t7 115917 B BA7EMAN f395.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION ROBERT BEIMRWILLIA $183.23 SUPPLIES _ 115015 ROBERT BEEN NILLIAM FROST {$39.62 PNSIN68RINC SSRVICS9 5-3�' A 11591E BELL PIPE L SUPPLY CO f39.62 PIPE �. 35417 _ _ ._Ri4A Rc . . . . _. .. 5116.39 TRUCK TS 11541E 8OLSA RADIATOR SERVICE S396.32 RADIATOR REPAIRS 115919 BON-A-RUES $211.68 TRUCK PARTS 115020. .___. . __.BOOT BARL�_EPUIP-INC ._. _. .. . ;4A$95.00 SAFETY CRAMSCSRTIFIGTION 1/5021 BOOT BARN 185.09 SAFETY SNOBS - --- �- �--�- -----_ 115022 - BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP $31.552.P4 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-17, 7-11 _ 115924__ 491HPE454N_EPPR__ _.6661,171.00 _ CONSTRUCTION J-19-2 115024 BRISTOLITE SKYLIGHTS - 3491.04 _ - -- - 9KYLITB - GOOF RSPAIRB-- -�---�- - __ 115025 BUILDER-S EMPORIUM $137.67 HARDWARE __l1502fi ___.. ONRHE-EHCIR£LING__� 9915.7fi-- _ _ _ ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 115027 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES INC $9.702.09 SURVEYING SERVICES ftlY 89=71'" 115028 CARY 6 STREED f949.08 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT ._ 115029 _._ ._-BOILER_�A2EHP OMeA_NY __. __..._._. .__. 3963.9E OFFICE SUPPLI.ES 1153 CAM CORPORATION .02 . LAB SUPPLIES 115931 CAL-6L455 FOR RESEARCH INC. 11 d23.4646 LAB 9UPPLI68 !b N FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/13/91 CAGE 2 N REPORT NUMBER AP43 .. ... _._.. -.- . _-._.._..-__.-....__ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY __.. CLAIMS PAID U6/19/91 POSTING DATE 06/19191 Y.AR RANT,NOS............_.__.._-.___YEtlRRfl-_-_ -__._ _ __ _ ._ _.ABOuNE_...-_ . DESCIIPTION 115032 CALTROL INC $4.767.77 INSTRUMENT PARTS 315033._... -.._. _.-JOMtl...d.__CAL APP.ICL_PXB....__. .. -._ . 122.197.61 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.1-14-90 115034 CALIFORNIA PANEL S VENEER $363.38 BUILDING MATERIALS 115035 CARLETON ENGINEERS $250.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.C.5-9-90 . 11503A_,_., -----CENTURY_PAINT ___.__. _._ _ _._ _ .-. .. _ _.__I121.09 PAINT SUPPLIES 115037 CHEVRON USA INC $7.187.71 OIL 6 GREASE 115030 CHROME CRANKSHAFT INC S360.01 MECHANICAL REPAIRS ➢ 115039_ ... ... .__..CONPBESSOB-.CORPONEN78-_Of.._CA .. . . . S702.90 MECHANICAL PARTS C1 115040 CONNELL GM PARTS / DIY $212.63 TRUCK PARTS f+7 115041 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $5.500.11 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES z 115042.. .__. _ ._..CONT INERtAL_-CMENICAL_.CL__. ..... ➢ . .1 NH 11504 CONTINENTAL LAB PRODUCTS 11391.10 LAB SUPPL IES II5014 CONTRACTOR'3 BOOK STOP[ $139.17 --- ---- _---- - PUBLICATIONS .-1159§1046 ..-_..-..CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 __.._......... .... .. .. _ S197.955.27 ELECTRIC LUPPLI89 m 115016 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 C f2.49S.22 SOIL NV 3 115017 CONVEYOR COMPONENTS CO f3S202.62 ELECTRICRIC SU TUPPLIEB z .._.1150AB.___...__COSTA_.NLTAJALE ELEP.LY____..___. .. $369.53 TRUELECTRIC IC it CJ 115050 COUNTY C WHOLESALE ELECTRIC .416.76 ELECTRIC LDPPL128 _ IIS050 CHEMICAL PROCESSORS INC $2.136.76 TRUCK BUPPLIBB 115052 _ ____COST.9RLY NELL066EUN.I LQIN2._ .._..._..... . ._.... ._ ._ .. ._ l703.79 TRUCK PARTS 1-' 115053 CAL POLY REL4064 UNIT 339199.00 OCEAN MONITORING INSTRUMENT $12053 DAILY PILOT. f189.00 NOTICES 6 ADS i _.115055 __...___. DANI.E_.$ TIRE__-..-___._-._. .__...__.__ ..._.A 91.518.82._ . - .... . . ._ TIRESCDMSU -_ - 88RVIC68__eM71 UA1� PREP____ 215056 DANI EDA TIRE SERVICE 11$562.50 TEAS$ _ ➢ I130S6 TOM DAMES $151.00 EQUIPMENT 6 TRAVEL BkPBNS¢8 .......4,526.25 ET RENTAL r DC-eN2d__S.OBPOBd1[RE-_-- .____ 113058 OCCRA-TREND f1.S16.25 PAINT SUP0LI89 - - - - ----� --� -- - tj 115059 BE GUELLE S SONS GLASS CO $436.32 GLASS __TOOL Cn 115061 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $1.349.72 PRINTING SERVICE AGREEMENT 115062 DOYEP ELEVATOR COMPANY $95.00 .. __ 115063____...___.DUNNE6_BARDS COtl__N➢YI MR.... _.. _. -_ _... _. .-.$6il20.93 _. SPACE RENSUPPAL LIES A -1 115065 OUNN EO YARDS COPP 36i$35.11 PAINT SUPPLIES -"1 IIS06S DAYALS SALES i54.11 OFFICE NJim. FACILITIES _..._ 60,664.30.85 -__ OFFICE SUPPLIBB 115060 FACILITIES SUPPORT CO $134.98 FITTINGS 115068 M41 INSTRUMENTS f CONTROL f131.96 INSTRUMENT C REPAIRS 115070_. _. . ..__.JOHN A8 FALKEEEB___._. ..-.... ..... - .._... ._.._ _93,200.02._ .. _ . _ _ CONSTRUCTION COMP DISTRISERVICES 115071 FEDERAL 4 EXPRESS ►[ f3$159.25 AIR FREIGHT 96RVIbES J-7=4 115071 FEDERAL CRPRCSS CORPCD l663.15 AIR FREIGHT .__._.FISCHEROAS —____.._---._-__—_. KLOS._ _ _ _ INSTPROPRUMENT 115074 FISHER i SCIENTIFIC CO f1.250.90 INSTRUMENT PARTS I15071 FISHER SC IC Ni1FIC CO i359.97 LAB SUPPLIES . 115075._. ..... .-FLAT---A ..YCfl L.CAL__GDtlCEETE.-_.__ .._ ._. ___.6143.50. coxcak98 CUTTING _. .- 1507 FLUID HANDLING STATERS 96. PUMP PARTS 115077 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA 97 fi6.4919 FILM Pa bU W FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CA-ITAL PROCESSING DATE 6113/91 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER 4Pe3 __-----_--COUNTY SANITAT 6tl DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY U 0 CLAIMS PAID 6/19/91 POSTING GATE 06/19/9l WARRANT.NO. _.—___YEtlDBt _.._ A93UNT - - OESCRI?TtDN __ _.....__..._— . . 115078 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY f9.294.19 WATER USE 115079 _ . _ .. FOUNTAIN. .YALLEY._PAINT . __ ._. _ S2.136.75 PAINT SUPPLIES 115080 FOX ENTERPRISES f1.825.00 SAFETY CONSULTANT 115081 FREDSON RV SUPPLY SS2.38 TRUCK PARTS _115202._.. .__.__FREEY6L..IBULB_eAItTs ___ _. _ ___. _ . _..5911.99 TRUCK PARTS 115083 ARBENE FREY $71.16 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 115084 CITY OF FULLERTON l60.40 WATER USE D 11504%_. ..-. .. _ _654PNL_-LUMBER_CO______ ... _ S115.47 HARDWARE/LUMBER m 115U86 GARDEN GROVE SANITARY DISTR 32.949.00 KONA SETTLEMENT DISTRIBUTION - - - TIT 118087 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY f3.249.11 CHEMICALS tv _. 1150011... ..__ .—_5CM-D-u rc _PLSllC LtOfl! _ - ....-. __._..... 1299.10 PAItIT 3UPPLI83 :c. 125089 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO S1r137.11 TELEPHONE SERVICES 115990 GEORGE LEECH L ASSOCIATES $010.60 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 115091.._. ._.____ION. BERL1tlGEfl .__.___._._ - _... S541.70 TRAINING EXPENSES_ REIMBURSEMENT m 115092 GOLDEN[H-MITCNESA INC s96.292.62 MECHANICAL PARTS 3 115093 GOLDEN COAST SAWDUST PROD t6.119.50 SAWDUSPUBLICATIONS 115095... ______GRAPY C DONLE�UTORS SJSSOC. __. ___._ _ .._ __ 730.91 PUBLICATIONS z 115095 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS f730.91 CAMERA 6 FILM 11509E FgEO A HARPER f1.460.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 11509T...__..._. 9RIL_ KDUIIfl1AL PL1ST1 _ _ _____. - _ _ ._ f509.28 _ INSTRUMENT PART - -. 115099 HATCH f MIRK INC $1,297.35 MECHANICAL PARTS 115101 PL HAWN CO INC f1r297.35 FILTERS -. 115200_. _......._NILTf INCACOAfln eo9PANr _.... _ . _-.9276.90 - _ .. _ .. COMPUTER SOFTWARE 115201 Ol HILTI I —�---�—� s278.90 TOOLS - — — - 115102 HINES UNOLESALE NURSERIES $949.66 GROUND COVER _. .115103.. _._MI_SIANDABD-AUTOtlOTIYL_ .._._.__._. ._ _-_ f972.88 - TRUCK PARTS r 1 15104 HOERRIBER CVS CALIF INC $1.485.11 MfiCNANICAL PARTS - CJ 315105 DONALD D HONDMICHL f300.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 11510E _.....___J.LJIOflYAIM_LJSSOC.� _32.405.00__ _ CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-11_ J-7 4 115108 MOUSE OF BATTERIES INC .05$341.15 SAFETY BATTERIES SUPPLIES I15100 RS MOGMES CO INC 77.951.15 CONSTRUCTION J-19-1 115110 . . _. ._...NUMIEB_F HUNTINGR--__. _ _. .3177.$15.47 _ _ ._ _.. .._____. . .. _--- - - _ HATER USE NCl 115113 CITY OF NUVALLEYON BEACH f15.97 115111 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHWINN C f195.78 BICYCLE PARTS 12521T ._ _.._..__IEEE NACOMP SERVICE—CENTER CE._t_..L4Z.. .- .. _.__ _. . _ .. ._ .944.96.. PUBLICATCOMPUTER MS HARDWARE 115114 INAC OMP COMPUTER CENTERS f6.952.50 COMPUTER HARUMANB - 115114 ISCD INC f20.852.53 HANDLER EQUIPMENT . 115116 _.INDUSTRI_NETHREAD CHEMICAL. _ _ _. _ _. . 5509664.02 FERROUS CHLORIDE M.0.4-11-90 11511E INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS .664.6E MMECTORS AG Iimle INFO RTERT SYSTEM- INC. $5.515.63 SERVICE AGREEMENT 115119 .. _ INER _PANEL.___._ _ _ _.iZ.$99.00 _ JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 115120 INTERNATIONAL UNIONOF TIME RECORDER f99.00 SERVICB AGREEMENT 115121 INIL UNION OF OPERATING-DISTRICT f2.$31.95 WASETTLEMENT, CASE 566658 115122 IRVItlE__LANLM_.MATEfl_.O13TRICT. _ 111.95 WATER USE 115122 JLA CREDIT CORP f113.32 MICAOFICNfi READER [BASE - - - 315123 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP $1,091.05 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES bd FUND NO 9199 - JT DIRT MORNING CAPITAL r PROCESSING 067E 6/11/91 vAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER fio63 .._ ..-.. _.__._...-.__... COUNTY SANITATION 915TRICT3 OF ORANGE 6COUNTY /19/9 CLAIMS PAID 06/19/91 POST IN6 GATE 06/19/91 _ VAR RANT.A O.. _._ ____. _PESO OR_._ --___-.__ _ _.. _ .._ ... . ARDUNT DESCRIPTION- - 215124 JAYS CATERING f795.75 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSES 115125.. ._ _ HALLEENIS_COMPUTER PRODUCTS .. iP3.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 115126 RAWER COMPANY $515.70 HARDWARE 115127 HAS SAFETY PRODUCTS SS7.09 SAFETY SHOES 9128.00 - SUBSCRIPTION 115129 HANG BEARING INC 38.299.3E MACHINE BUPPLIE3 11513030 RLEINFELDER $2.651.26 GEOTECHNICCONSTRUCTION SERVICES m ._ 115131.._... ... .._ RA6T.IN__SOROICH._SER_. ._. ...__.. - . 32.641.2E CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 19-1-2, _I-9_ fll 115132 LIFECON-SAFETY SERVICE SUPPL $440.45 SAFETY REPAIRS z 115133 NDS f153.21 METER REPAIRS C7 -115138- ..._ _...___MPS _-_-_...__ _ . ._ _.._ _ .. . _.i928.89 -. PHOTO SERVICES M 115136 MACOMCO 128.00 SERVTCE EPAIEM¢NT - 115136 MARSUALI JUDUS REPAIR CO. INC 330.907.31 BOILER REPAIRS m .. 115137_ _..__-_ M►BStlLLL-.INORS I RIALTECN .._ ._ . .. _ SIG9.90 VIDEO RENTAL FTl 11513E MATT - CHLRR INC f$61.30 CHLORINATION PARTS 3 115139 MCMASTEIIENT SUPPLY CO 265.75 HARDWARE Z -_ 11519➢.___ .__-tlE1 SIIRENENI_CONTBOL_.SY S__lNL- ..._._ ..._ _.._. _ - 5265.T3 INSTRUMENT PARTS- p 115141 CEOMPTDN METERNASTER INC f859.93 INSTRUMENT PARTS - -- 115192 PILLAR ELEVATOR BEEVICE f9/2.66 SERVICE AGREEMENT ..__115183_.. _.-----..MILMAIIHEE-ELEETBIr_s00L_COR _.. _ . ._. .. ._ . -_ f25.12 ... - TOOL REPAIR 115199 MINE SAFETY AFPLIANCES CO S5.592.51 SAFETY SUPPLIES 115145 MISCO 9115.78 OFFICE SUPPLIES I .115146__ _-_JIISSION ARRASIYC_SUPPLIES_.____._..__._...__ __. __ . __f1A2.38___ - .. HARDWARE n 115147 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL INC 2110.76 PUBLICATION -- - - -- ----- _-- - _ r 11510B MONITOR PUBLISHING CO 952.00 PUBLICATION F- 115149 _.. ..JAMES_.N_J10NTGONERI_-_.-... .. .... 17.922.05 - ENGINEERING SERVICES_ 115150 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES $630.00 LAB SERVICES - - - - b 115151 MICHAEL D MOTOE 5553.29 TRAINING 6 MEETING EXPENSES In __115152._....__._J18TJ.ON-IHOUSTB IES..JJIL____ _ _i283.33.._ .-._._ .. MECHANICAL PARTS 115153 MOTOR INC f1.6 RADIO-PARTS INFORMATION 16 .� 115159 NEC INFORMATION SYSTEMS S61.65 COMPUTER SOFTWARE -4 . 115155 . . ._ NATIONAL-PLANTM1SERVI.DATA - C. S34.90 PUBLICATION - cn 11515E NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES AMC f7.190.00 VACUUM AGCX SERVICES In 115157 NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPLY 3215.5E JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 115159 __ GUST.__M ELECTRONICS CO _. 3L336 J26.22. _ _ CONSTRUCTION P1-33 11516D NU-MES ELECTRONICS f16.53 COMPUTER PART - - 115160 OFFICET FABRICATION f719.93 PIPS SUPPLIES 115162 __.. OFFICIA P MINORITY RE8 ._. .f 1.OB5.53 OFFICE FURNITURE 115163 OFFICIAL MINORITY REVIEW ,729.91 CHLORIN 6 AOB 115163 DR SYSTEMS CO f99.936.91 CHLORINE M.0.2-19-90 115165 .. __ORANGE COAST EL._COBCAY T _ _ .__. .__._-1S•988.73 _. _ __ CHCMICALS_ 115165 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPL 323.59 ELECTRIC SUPPLIBS 11516E ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C f323.20 MUCHYDK PARTS .115167 ..._ .___._ORANGE _COUNTY_.FARM AL_20 ... _ ... - ... __. __. _31.619.20 _. .. JANITORIAL SCHLORIC ACID _ 115169 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY C f051.83 JANITORIAL BUPPLICB 115169 ORANGE VALVE 0 FITTING CO. f99.A3 LAB SUPPLIBS bU FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST VORRING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/I3/91 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER 4PA1 .. _ _. .___ .—..._... COUNTY CLAI SANITATION 061 DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 6119/9 CLAIMS PAID D6/19/9l POSTING DATE 06/19/91 LEN➢➢fl_____._____.____ .ASOUNT . . _. . ._ . . _. . _. DESCRIPTION 315179 OXYGEN SERVICE S3.90S.28 SPECIALTY GASES SISITI . .___. _._ L➢UMTI_�f.._➢R2tl6C__. . __.. _ ... . $3.469.00 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES ._ 115372 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT S7.333.21 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCB 115173 PSSI fTS0.00 T.V SEWER SERVICES .f1.563.95 . . SAFETY SUPPLIES 115175 PACTEL CELLULAR $97.67 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 115176 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $1.642.92 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS Gnl 115177 _ ,. MLMIEEI LTY6LE I. VICNER.. ..... $1,777.30 LEGAL SERVICES - OIL WELLS M.0.12_12-90 IT IIU170 ►ATiCN CORP/ TAYLOR TWISTS 3330.06 CHARTS Z 115179 PEAT MARWICK MAIN 6 CO S1.478.00 AUDITING SERVICES C7 . .145309 .. _. ._ _SILYE_PELLC IICB.____ _.... ..... . _. _. $950.61 REPLACEMENT WARRANT 3. 115181 ROT PCNDCRGRAFT S950.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 115182 PICKWICK PAPER $274.05 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES --I 11 SS 85,_ _ ,._.__..PTNA_5H➢_3T3T[BS.JN4.____._. .. . . 665.891.13 RESIDUALS REMOVAL IT1 115184 PLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE i166.15 HARDWARE 3 115185 POLYPURE INC S17.170.46 CATIONIC POLYMER H.0.3-11-57 1ISIOR—__ __._P.4SLIJYE_E➢flMJ1LAT➢EL_INC.—_._.__...__.. ___.... __4352.70 GROUNDSKEEPINO SUP_PLIEB 2 115187 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO $53.86 ELECTRIC SUPPLIEE 11518E MAROLD PRIMROSE ICE 6133.0J ICE .115109_.. ...___.iNE .eBQ.JELI_ S9lLLIlONS_L0. ._... . . . .... 54.400.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTI.ON IT 0.8-8-88 �-' I15198 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO $1.1}1.90 TRASH REMOVAL O 115191 RECTO INC f62.916.17 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.C.7-I1-90 1 __..11il92_._._._._eBLGs➢8e...I EULINLSNL__..__.. . —__SIB D.OD._._ _ _ STREET SWEEPING 115193 RED VALVE CD INC 3212.62 FREIGHT - - -- — -- - D 115199 RED WING SHOES $190.54 SAFETY SHOES r 115195_ .. ......._E!._.HEL➢__ELEClBIG . ..69.EET•09 .. . ELECTRIC REPAIRS 115196 REGAIN ._. ._ ... _... .. . 3S 79.A0SERVICES CONSULTING O 115197 REMEDY TEMP 91.245.51 TEMPORARY SERVICES IISIXI . .._.._ _BEH➢IEJIEILB�[SLi_UNQ_.(O STET __._63.080.00_.. _ _ POSTAGE 115199 ADRIANA RENESCU _ $79.67 MEETING LTWVBL E%PBNGEO A 115200 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO $1.049.15 PLUMBING SUPPLIES �-+ CONSTRUCTION J-17 115202 �! 8B➢ TCO $216.005.40 � . .. . .. . . - CONSTRUCTION J-23-1 _.... . _______... .. 115203 J R GEE ROBERTSROB RTSO f216$307.00 Cn 915203 6EDRGC RO BERTSON f307.00 TWINING 6 MEETING EXPENSES .115209... .._..._._.MICHAE➢N_E.EEil41LEH . LO. ..__ _. . ._. _. f892.66. . MEMICALTRAINING _ _ TWINING 6' M6ETING a%PEWEES II5205 MICHAEL R02[N6URT spol$525.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION II5Y06 PEGGT SUP► f525.00 115207._.. .... ._._SAFETY-KLEEW .. ,. . _ _ _ S3$199.20 PUMP PARTS 1I5209 SAFETY-SLEEN CORP 3199.20 PARTS CLEANER IISY09 SAFETY BUFFET OF ANFRICA 31.196.99 SAFETY SUPPLIES _.11521Q..... . ..._.__DOUG➢I SARVI SNEEE IN➢......I tlG___ ... . ._ _._.._3A$350.30 ENGINEERING EERVICES TING*V IISPlI DOUG SAR VIS f3S0.70 TRAINING L MEETING E8PEN8Eb ---��� -- 115212 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT.L $34.942.20 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-13-90 ._ 115213 ........... .. . UPTT. C➢MPAIM._ .._.___......._.. .. ._ ._ .. ... $12,203.00 LAB TRAILER SET-UP M.0.11-10-90 11521/ WENDY T SEVENAMOT S260.01 TWINING 6 MEETING EXPENSES'- " 115215 SHAMROCK SUPPLY f9.6I6.43 HARDWARE/TOOLS OU td FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/I3/91 PAGE 6 T COUNTY NU Xfl Ei 4P43 SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 96/19/9l POSTING DATE 06/19/91 VARRPNT NO,_ _-. _.,.___YERQDfl_.___._-._._.__- .- ... _. AMOUNT. .. DESCRIPTION 115216 SHEPHERD MACHINERY CO t138.58 TRUCK PARTS 115217 .. .SHURELUCS_.SALES-------. .._ .. _. - . $350.56 TOOLS 115218 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO $60.86 CHEMICALS - 115219 SKYLINE DISPLAYS $5,329.26 BUILDING MATERIALS .__115220.._—..__SXl2ARM HALM-TU MEDICAL111_..._._._ .. __. __._170.00. -. _ PHYSICAL EXAMS 115222 SO OIL• $146.06 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 115222 SO IBEAN BOILER, INC S757.85 BOILER REPAIRS 3.m .__ 115224 _._ .. _..—SOVI CALN_CALIF_EOISOM_t0_.__._.. .. NSLL91.9! POWER T 115229 SO CAL GAS CO $1.519.39 NATURAL GAS - Z 115225 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO S1.256.44 DIESEL FUEL t p 115726... __..--34UY.EtlIH_PMO T9—__—_-.___...__ __ _-... . - 946.66 PHOTO SERVICES D 115227 SPARKLETTS DRINKTYG PATER 92.419.54 HATER/COOLER RENTALS - _ 115228 STAMEN 2 SPASSDFF PE $3.720.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-34-2 115229__.._..___VE$TALLQL'_INC __._._-.__ _. _ . _, - .i59b66 WELDING SUPPLIES 115230 SPIRAL BINDING CO INC $237.17 OFFICE SUPPLIES - - "- 3 115231 JAMES STANFILL CONSTRUCTION 210.200.00 CONSTRUCTION MODIFICATION - J-7-4 5693.73 TOOLS ZO - . .. . . ART SUPPLIES.. 115234 SUNNIIN6 ART 773.02 115245 SUMMIT STEEL $774.09 METAL ..-215235.._ ._._.._ _.COPER_.NTAL AIRC TOOL INC _. .- 3I23.20 PAINT SUPPLI88 CD 115237 CONTINENTAL AIR i00L INC 14.493.65 TOOLS 1152I7 SWIFT JEEP EAGLE f14.739.09 AUTOMOBILE 1 __1152A0.__.--_TA749Re11DOMPANV _LGNP►0I_....__... _ _._- _ ._ __.843.05.. _ . _ ELECTRIC CART PARTS__ 115279 7EKM AR COMPANY t5.B41.05 LAB SUPPLIES - - -- - ---"----'_-- D 11524D TEKTRONIX INC $2.707.50 VIDEO REPAIRS ___f521.02 INSTRUMENT PARTS _. _ 115242 TNDMPSDN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $142.26 HARDWARE ty 115243 TONY S LOCK 1 SAFE SERVICE S136.30 LOCK REKEYING MATE CO ._J15244__._._.._TRl—IC CORIAL ... S14B.32... _ _ _. _ BUILDING MATERIALS 115246 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE INC $2.697.00 TRAVEL SERVICES CES H.O. 6DI3T 2 115746 TRAVEL TRAVEL f. 1194.71 TRAVEL ARTYICE9 M.0.6-13-90 n 11529E .. __. -TRUCK R A1lIO_S1fP.PLT.._iNL __ - _ . . . . . $131.96 TRUCK PARTS f-4 115249 UNOCAL 9215.35 UNLEADED GASOLINE L' 115949 THE UNISOURCE CORP $175.85 OFFICE SUPPLISERVICES .._.11525v.._ _._..__...UNI7SDESTINSEL_EFRYILE_.___. ... _ i195.95 PARCEL ONS TEST ES 115252 VOC TESTING .154.02 LAB SSIONS TESTING — _ - /15252 YYR SCIENTIFIC f5.1l4.02 PLU SUPPLIES 11525r1 .... .._ _.VALLEY _-INTIES_.SYPP LI _SIO - . . fL41492$1.066.02 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 115255 VERTEX INSTRUMENT OIYISION f1.B66.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS - -'- -- 1I5255 VERTEX SYSTEMS 26.307.50 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 115256 . ...... _V IKI4._ILDUSIRIAL---SUPPLC_.... ._. . .- ..__.._ _._. ._.3672.01 . . _ PAINT SUPPLIES 115250 CAR WADE AR i2$911.05 RON - DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL-• 11525E CAUL YARPCX R CO $175.73 INSURANCE CLAIMB ADMINISTRATOR 115259_. ._,.,. -._ YESTATESDMCARBONE.-.—...-. __.. . _. 4I75.00 _ RENTAL EQUIPMENT 115261 VESTETCS CARBON INC $4.366.50 CHEMICALS - 115261 YESTEgN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY 529r 259.51 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-8-90 CC (71 to V FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/13/91 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP93 .. .._ ._ . . . . ._.............—.—.__—__.__._..COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY . ._._... CLAIMS PAID 06/19/99/9l POSTING DATE 06/19/91 WARBAHT_MO�__�. WINRDR .___._._.__. _.._ _AROUNI_._. . . _. _. DESCRIPTION_ _. 115262 WILCON IND S1P6.87 INSTRUMENT.PART 115263 .... ... WILLUA7L._ASSOCIATES........._ .._, .... .. _ 500.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 115264. R-TREE CO ,036.81 COPIER L SOFTWARE 115265 XEROX COMP $S r036.10 COPIER LBA969 ...._1152fii._.__.__.__...➢OBE.6YOUNG ROOFING ._ _. 9.332.50 VALVE 115260 BOB YOUNG ROOFING 89r532.50 ROOFING TIPAIAS 115268 ZI EB ARTM 0 AL PFR/C.8. AL PEP $108.159.00 CONSTRUCTION P2-92-1 ....___...RICHARD _AN B_ALP.EB.__....._._. . .. fl0B$200.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-39-1 � ...115261 .... -- DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION f7'1 115270 RICH ARD B EDGAR 8200.00 C ..........__ _...____.__.___D TOTAL CLAIMS PAID..0..6/1.9l. .._._.._85r550_r.B16.96 r,,,� eaasasaaaa==za=s_ f11 3 SUMMARY__.— X1 OPER FUND $259.83 ..._12..OPER FUdfL—_—._ _...._. ..__ _ _... 03,676.72 X2 CAP PAC FUND $2,690.00 13 OPER FUND $21,670.80 I _._1.3S8P FAC..IUND. X5 OPER FUND S5,086.31 r X5 CAP FAC FUND $183.23 F- /6. OPER FUND__.... —_ _ _ _ _ . .4200.77 .._.._ ..... . 87 OPER POO X12,197.05 C X7 CAP FAC FUND $5,659.89 N ..._ .611 DPER FUND__.______ III CAP FAC FUND $3,050.29 X13 OPER FUND $47.87 134 OPEN FUND_ _ .. .._...._ _ _ 27.02 _ .__......_. .. . f"t R14 CAP FAC FUND $602.95 4566 OPER FUND $45.61 N' .... 17619.OPER FUNS _. . _. ..16,050.00,__. JT OPER FUND ,700,020.43 CORD j9�7BB,G2G.93 SELF FUNDlD INJURANOS. FDN43__—__.....__..._.. . .. _.._.. ..._ _. l8,336.26 JT WORKING CAPITAL 1154,910.52 ------------------- __ ... ... . .. ._._....._..____'__—.___..._ _.__..__._.... ....... .... . ._.... .0,6S0,816.96 . . x bo RESOLUTION NO. 91-92-1 AUTHORIZING FILING FOR FEDERAL AND STATE CLEAN WATER GRANTS AND LOANS - 1991-92 JOINT WORKS IMPROVEMENTS AND ADDITIONS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE EXECUTION AND FILING OF DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDERAL AND STATE CLEAN WATER GRANTS AND LOANS UNDER 33 U.S.C. , 1251 ET SEQ. ; AND CHAPTERS 12.5, 13, 14 AND 15; DIVISION 7 OF THE CALIFORNIA WATER CODE ON BEHALF OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AND PROVIDING CERTAIN ASSURANCES f f k f f k k k f f k f k k k k The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT: Section 1: An Act of Congress known as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (also known as the Clean Water Act and the Water Quality `...� Act of 1987) (33 U.S.C. , 1251 et seq.) provides for federal grants and loans for construction of sewage treatment works. Section 2: The State Clean Water Bond Laws of 1970, 1974, 1978 and 1984 and implementing statutes authorize the State Water Resources Control Board to enter into contracts with public agencies for State grants and loans for construction of sewage treatment works. Section 3: County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County is a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3, Division 5, of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California, for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk sewer system for the collection of sewage from the cities and other local sewering agencies, and has joined with other County Sanitation Districts - namely, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, in constructing, operating and "C-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-1" maintaining joint sewage treatment plants and disposal facilities under an agreement dated July 1, 1985, known as the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement. Section 4: In accordance with the terms of said Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement, County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California acts for itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, each organized for similar purposes and serving different territories, all in Orange County, California, for the purpose of constructing and operating said joint sewage - treatment plants and disposal facilities. Section 5: By means of this Resolution and of the Resolutions set forth below by number, the following County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California have authorized the filing of applications for grants and loans under said Acts of Congress and said Clean Water Bond Laws and have authorized County Sanitation District No. 1 to file said applications on their behalf: DISTRICT NO. RESOLUTION NO. 2 91-93-2 3 91-94-3 5 91-95-5 6 91-96-6 7 91-97-7 11 91-98-11 13 91-99-13 14 91-100-14 Section 6: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, is hereby authorized and directed to sign and file for and on behalf of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, acting for itself and as agent for County "C-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-2" Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, I California, Application for a Federal Grant and/or Loan for Sewage Treatment Works under 33 U.S.C., 1251 at seq., and a State Grant and/or Loan for Clean Water under the Clean Water Bond Laws of 1970, 1974, 1978 and 1984, for a joint project generally described as follows: 1991-92 Joint Works Improvements and Additions Section 7: District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, hereby agrees and further does authorize the aforementioned representative to certify that if a federal grant or loan for its project is made pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C., 1251 at seq.) , it will pay the remaining cost of the approved project; it will provide proper and efficient operation and maintenance of the approved project after completion of construction thereof; it will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (F.L. 88-352) and the regulations issued pursuant thereto and state that the assurance and compliance with such regulations attached to the application for federal grant or loan applies to this project; and it will comply with requirements of Executive Order 11246 pertaining to equal employment opportunity in federally-assisted construction contracts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held July 17, 1991. "C-3" AGENDA ITEM #11(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ` P O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 4 109"ELLIS.FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714)962-2411 June 26, 1991 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Professional Consulting Services with Boyle Engineering Corporation in Connection with Wastewater Quality, Diversion and Treatment Study In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional consulting services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with Boyle Engineering Corporation for the preparation of Wastewater Quality, Diversion and Treatment Study, on an hourly-rate basis including labor plus overhead, and direct expenses and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed $88,055. `..� Professional Services, (hourly rates including labor plus overhead at 153%). not to exceed $71,160 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 8,000 Fixed Profit 8,895 TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed $88,055 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /a/A. B. Catlin /s/William Mahone A. B. Catlin William ahoney Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Thomas M. Dawes Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering Selection Committee "D" AGENDA ITEM #11(d)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "D" RESOLUTION NO. 91-101 t APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR PREPARATION OF WASTEWATER QUALITY, DIVERSION AND TREATMENT STUDY A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR PREPARATION OF WASTEWATER QUALITY, DIVERSION AND TREATMENT STUDY WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 and 14 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures, an agreement has been negotiated with Boyle Engineering Corporation for preparation of a Wastewater Quality, Diversion and Treatment Study; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Board of Directors on April 10, 1991, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has certified the final negotiated fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Professional Services Agreement dated July 17, 1991, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and as contracting agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and Boyle Engineering Corporation, for preparation of a Wastewater Quality, Diversion and Treatment Study, is hereby approved and accepted; and, -1° AGENDA ITEM N11(d) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS -1" Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows: Professional Services at hourly rates for labor, plus overhead at 153%, not to exceed $ 71,160.00 Dixect Expenses at cost, not to exceed 8,000.00 Fixed Profit 8,895.00 TOTAL, not to exceed $ 88,055.00 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and as contracting agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held July 17, 1991. "E-2" AGENDA ITEM411(d)(2) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS.FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 June 26, 1991 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation in Connection with Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17 In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee for Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for the design of the Central Laboratory, Jab No. J-17, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct costs, subconsultants, and profit, in an amount not to exceed $51,200.00 as follows: Existing Change per Amended Agreement Addn. No. 4 Agreement Professional Services, (hourly rates including labor plus overhead at 155.5%), not to exceed $370,909 $ -0- $370,909 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 5,000 -0- 5,000 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 129750 -0- 12,750 Fixed Profit 52,084 -0- 52,084 $440,743 $ -0- $440,743 Resident Project Representative, (hourly rate including labor, overhead and profit), at $80 per hour, not t0 exceed $200,960 $ 51,200 $252,160 TOTAL CONTRACT $6419703 $ 51,200 $692,903 "F-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(e)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS AT ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Boards of Directors 1084A ELLIS AVENUE June 26, 1991 PO Bo.8127 Page Two FOUNTAIN VALLEY..UAUFO9NiA 92728-8127 n141962-2411 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/A. B. Catlin /s/William Mahoney A. B. Catlin William Mahoney Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Thomas M. Dawes Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering Selection Committee "F-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(e) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-2" RESOLUTION NO. 91-102 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 4 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES _ AGREEMENT WITH 80YLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR DESIGN OF JOB NO. J-17 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 4 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR DESIGN OF CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17, PROVIDING FOR ADDITIONAL RESIDENT PROJECT ENGINEER SERVICES z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into a Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 provided for additional engineering services to accommodate proposed change in the location of the site of the laboratory and other design and scope of work changes; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 2 provided for wage escalations due to delays in the project plus construction management/inspection services; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 3 provided for additional design services relative to the interior of the laboratory to accommodate changing needs and to handle the expanded scope of work and increased demands placed on the Laboratory; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend the agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation to provide for additional Resident Project Engineer services because of the delay in the completion of the laboratory; and, WHEREAS, the Selection Committee has negotiated and certified a fee for said additional services in accordance with established procedures for the selection of professional services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: "G-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(e) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-1" Section 1. That Addendum No. 4 dated July 17, 1991, to that certain agreement dated August 13, 1986, by and between County Sanitation Districts `...� Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 and .Boyle Engineering Corporation, for design of Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17, providing for additional Resident Project Engineer services, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased by an amount not to exceed $51,200.00, as follows, which increases the total authorized compensation from $641,703.00 to an amount not to exceed $692,903.00: Existing Change per Amended Agreement Addendum No. 4 Agreement Professional Services, at hourly rates for labor plus overhead at 155.5%. not to exceed $370,909 $ -0- $370,909 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 5,000 -0- 5,000 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 12,750 -0- 12.750 Fixed Profit 52,084 -0- 52,084 SUBTOTALS $440,743 $ -0- $440,743 Resident Project Engineer Services, at hourly rates for labor including overhead and profit ($80/hour), not to exceed $200,960 $51,200 $252,160 TOTALS $641,703 $51,200 $692,903 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 4 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held July 17, 1991. G-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(e)(2) - ALL DISTRICTS ""G-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS c � "a OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA " P.O.BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 y� 10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 ��4cc cW (714)962-2411 June 26, 1991 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum No. 2 to Consulting Services Agreement with The Project Solutions Company for Specialized Instrumentation Design and Inspection Services required for Various Master-Planned Construction Projects In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee for Addendum No. 2 to the consulting services agreement with The Project Solutions Company for an extension to the agreement to provide specialized engineering, inspection and construction management services on master-planned construction projects, at hourly rates on an as-needed basis, for a period of three years beginning September 1, 1991, as follows: Instrumentation Design and Inspection Services, at hourly rates, as follows: $59.00 per hour, September 1, 1991 through August 31, 1992 $62.00 per hour, September 1, 1992 through August 31, 1993 $65.00 per hour, September 1, 1993 through August 31, 1994 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/A. B. Catlin /s/William Mahoney A. B. Catlin William Mahoney Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Thomas M. Dawes homas M. Dawes Director of Engineering Selection Committee „H„ AGENDA ITEM #11(f)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "H" RESOLUTION NO. 91-103 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT H THE T L TI N MPAN A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS COMPANY FOR SPECIALIZED ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SERVICES RE INSTRUMENTATION/PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEMS IN VARIOUS MASTER-PLANNED CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS, PROVIDING FOR AN EXTENSION OF THE TERM OF SAID AGREEMENT AND REVISION OF HOURLY-RATE FEE SCHEDULE WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with The Project Solutions Company for specialized engineering and construction inspection services re instrumentation/process control systems included in various master-planned construction projects; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. I provided for a three-year extension of the term of said agreement and revision of the hourly-rate fee schedule; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend the agreement with The Project Solutions Company to provide an extension of the term of said agreement for up to three years and revision of the hourly-rate fee schedule; and, WHEREAS, the Selection Committee has negotiated and certified the fees for said additional services, in accordance with established procedures for selection of professional services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: - Section 1. That Addendum No. 2 dated July 17, 1991, to that certain Professional Services Agreement dated September 9, 1987, by and between County "I-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(f) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-1" Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 and The Project Solutions Company, for specialized engineering and construction inspection services re instrumentation/process control systems included in various master-planned construction projects, providing for an extension of the term of said agreement for up to three years from September 1, 1991 to August 31, 1994 and revision of the hourly-rate fee schedule, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the contract provision for fees for said services, on an as-needed basis, be increased, as follows, plus direct expenses at cost for out-of-town travel : Contract Period Hourly Rate September 1, 1991 through August 31, 1992 $59.00 September 1, 1992 through August 31, 1993 $62.00 September 1, 1993 through August 31, 1994 $65.00 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 2 on behalf of itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held July 17, 1991. "I-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(f) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA un P P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9270 7018 �/ 46E w4 (714)962-2411 June 26, 1991 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 Subject: Certification of Purchase Orders for Soils, Concrete and Materials Testing Services for Various Collection System and Treatment Plant Projects, Specification No. S-055 In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional services, the Selection Committee has negotiated purchase orders for testing services with four firms on master-planned construction projects, at per test and hourly rates on an as-needed basis, for a period of three years, as follows: Type and Location Annual Finn of Work Amount Converse Consultants Soils and Concrete-Plants and $ 50,000 Collection System Professional Service Soils and Concrete-Collection $ 50,000 Industries, Inc. System Twining Labs of Southern Full Service-Plants and Collection $100,000 California System Smith-Emery Company Full Service-Plants $100,000 The Selection Committee recommends that purchase orders be issued to these four firms in the maximum amount indicated, per year for the testing services indicated. B. Catlin /s/William Mahoney A. B. "Buck" Catlin William Mahoney Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee h/Thomas M. Dawes Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering Selection Committee J" AGENDA ITEM #11(g) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "J" RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF THE FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL TRUST AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of this County Sanitation District of Orange County, California (the "District") has previously authorized the execution and delivery of a Trust Agreement, dated as of November 1, 1990, by and among County Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California (collectively, the "Districts" ) and Texas Commerce Bank National Association, as Trustee (the "Trustee" ) (the "Trust Agreement") with respect to the execution and delivery of $100,000,000 aggregate principal amount of the Districts' Certificates of Participation (Capital Improvement Program, 1990-92 Series A) (the "Certificates" ) ; and WHEREAS, in order to provide that the Record Date for the Certificates in the Daily Mode be changed to the last day of the month, an amendment to the Trust Agreement is desirable and in the best interests of the parties to the Trust Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Districts and the Trustee desire to execute and deliver the First Supplemental Trust Agreement, dated as of June 1, 1991 by and among the Districts and the Trustee (the "First Supplemental Agreement") the proposed form of which has been presented to this Board of Directors, to accomplish such amendment to the Trust Agreement; and WHEREAS, Section 9.02 of the Trust Agreement provides that the Trust Agreement may be amended at any time by a supplemental trust agreement, entered into among the Trustee and the Districts, with the written consent of the owners of Outstanding Certificates representing at least two-thirds in aggregate unpaid Principal Component at the time such consent is given, and the written consent of National Westminster Bank PLC, San Francisco Overseas Branch (the "Bank" ) ; and NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the District does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That the First Supplemental Trust Agreement, in the form presented to this Board of Directors, is hereby approved. The Chairman or Chairman pro tempore and the Board l I "K-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(h) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-1" Secretary or Deputy Board Secretary are authorized and directed for 4� and in the name of the District to execute and deliver said agreement. The First Supplemental Trust Agreement shall be executed and delivered in the form hereby approved, with such additions thereto and changes therein as are recommended or approved by Special Counsel to the Districts and approved by such officers, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery thereof. SECTION 2z The Chairman, Chairman pro tempore, Board Secretary and any other officer, official or member of the staff of the District is each authorized and directed, jointly and severally, to do any and all things and to execute and deliver any and all documents which they may deem necessary and advisable in order to effectuate the purposes of this Resolution, and such actions previously taken by such officers are hereby ratified and confirmed. SECTION 3: This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held July 17, 1991. 2 "K-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(h) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-2" RESOLUTION NO. ADOPTING FEES, PROCEDURES AND POLICIES CONCERNING ANNEXATIONS OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. AND MINUTE ORDERS IN CONFLICT HEREWITH A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING FEES PROCEDURES AND POLICIES CONCERNING ANNEXATIONS OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 82- AND MINUTE ORDERS IN CONFLICT HEREWITH x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. the Board of Directors established a revised annexation policy which provides for acreage fees that are authorized to be adjusted each year by the General Manager to reflect the increase in the Engineering News Record (ENR) Construction Cost Index for the preceding March to the bass of 383 (March 1982 Index, 1967 - 100) ; and, WHEREAS, the General Manager has carried out the provisions of said Resolution each year since the adoption of Resolution No. and, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has reviewed a management report, including financial needs of the District and wishes to reaffirm the policy of imposing annexation fees when new territory is annexed to the District, and to adopt findings supporting the amount of the fees adopted pursuant to this Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No._ of Orange County, California, -1- "L-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(k) - DISTRICTS 2,3,5,7&11 "L-1" DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1 : Findings. The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No._ of Orange County, California does hereby find: A. That a comprehensive- 30-year Master Plan of Capital Facilities entitled, "Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan - 1989, " hereinafter the "Master Plan, " which includes detailed financial and engineering reports, has been prepared, approved and adopted by the Board of Directors identifying the required future development of District and jointly-owned facilities, including the financial projections for providing sewer service to all properties within the District' s service areas; and B. That the financial and engineering reports of the Master Plan have been made available to the public and have been subject to noticed public hearings, all in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 54992 and other provisions of law; and C. That the revenues derived under the provisions of Resolution No._, hereinafter repealed, and the provisions of this Resolution, have been and will continue to be used for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance and operation of the sewage collection facilities, wastewater treatment and disposal facilities of the District; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments or to repay federal or state loans for the construction and reconstruction of said sewerage facilities, together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserves; and -2- "L-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(k) - DISTRICTS 2,3,5,7&11 "L-2" D. That the properties upon which the fees established by this Resolution are levied, will discharge wastewater to the District's collection, treatment and disposal facilities; that the costs of operating and maintaining said facilities has constantly increased due in part to increased regulatory requirements to upgrade the treatment process; and that said costs will exceed the amounts of any ad valorem tax revenues derived from said property; and E. That the District will not receive any tax exchange from said annexed properties because of an agreement with the County of orange under which there is no tax exchange for newly annexed property; and F. That the annexation fees imposed by authority of this Resolution do not exceed the estimated amount required to provide the sewer service for which the fee is levied, as provided in Government Code Sections 54991 and 54992; and G. That the fees confirmed by this Resolution will not necessarily result in an expansion of facilities to provide for growth outside the existing service area. The confirmation of these annexation fees will not result in any specific project and will not result in a direct physical change in the environment; and H. That the fees adopted by this Resolution are a reenactment of fees previously adopted by authority of Resolution No. , and are established upon a rational basis between the fees charged each property that is annexing and the service and facilities provided to each annexed property by the District; and -3- "L-3" AGENDA ITEM #11(k) - DISTRICTS 2,3,5,7811 "L-3" I. That the adoption of this Resolution is statutorily exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act from further environmental assessment pursuant to the provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 21080(b) (8) , and 14 California Code of Regulations Section 15273(a) . Section 2: Purpose. A purpose of this Resolution is to confirm the fees that have been previously established pursuant to the procedure set forth in Resolution No. 82 _ for the annexation of property to the District. Revenues derived under the provisions of Resolution No. 82 -_ shall be used for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance and operation of the sewage collection facilities, wastewater treatment and disposal facilities of the District; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments; or to repay federal or state loans issued for the construction and reconstruction for said sewerage facilities, together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserves. Section 3: Confirmation of Prior Fees. .The annexation fees previously established by the General manager on an annual adjustment basis, pursuant to Resolution No. 82 _ are hereby confirmed. Section 4: That the proponents of any application for annexation of any territory to the District shall, as a condition to securing approval of the Board of Directors of the District to such annexation, comply with the following requirements: A. Payment of all costs incurred in processing the annexation. V� -4- "L-4" AGENDA ITEM #11(k) - DISTRICTS 2,3,5,7&11 "L-4" B. Payment of annexation acreage fees as follows: (1) Properties for which there is a negotiated tax exchange. Beginning July 1 , 1991, the sum to be paid for annexation of territory to the District for which a tax exchange is negotiated between all affected agencies is hereby fixed at per acre. Said acreage shall remain in effect until modified by action of this Board of Directors or adjusted in accordance with Subsection (c) herein. The minimum charge shall be the rate applicable for a parcel of one (1 ) acre. Prior to the completion of proceedings for such annexations of territory, an agreement shall be negotiated between affected agencies to provide for an exchange of property tax revenues between County Sanitation District No.—and all other affected taxing agencies, pursuant to the provisions of Division 1, Part 0.5, Chapter 6 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code (Sections 95 at seg. ) . (2) Property for which there is no negotiated tax exchange. Beginning July 1 , 1991, the sum to be paid for annexation of territory to the District for which no tax exchange is negotiated between all affected agencies is hereby fixed at per acre. Said acreage fee shall remain in effect until modified by action of this Board of Directors or adjusted in accordance with Subsection (c) herein. The minimum charge shall be the rate applicable for a parcel of one (1) acre. ( 3) The annexation acreage fee in effect at the time of payment shall govern the amount of the fee due. -5- "L-5" AGENDA ITEM #11(k) - DISTRICTS 2,3,5,7&11 "L-5" C. Beginning July 1, 1991, and annually thereafter, the annexation acreage- fees herelnabove set forth in Subsection (b) are to be adjusted to reflect the increase in the Engineering News Record (ENR) Construction Cost index for the preceding March to a base of 491.51 (March 1991 index; 1967 = 100) . D. The annexed territory shall be subject to the terms and conditions of all ordinances and resolutions pertaining to fees for connection to the District's facilities and use of said facilities including, but not limited to, industrial discharge permit fees, connection charges and user/service fees. E. The annexed territory shall be annexed into an appropriate local sewering agency, or obtain the written approval of the designated local sewering agency, such as a city, for the purpose of maintaining and operating the local sewer system, including pumping stations and force mains. .,/ F. The territory, upon annexation, shall be subject to all ad valorem taxes required for the retirement of the existing and future bonds of the the District and all other applicable ad valorem taxes of the District. G. Any area within the territory annexed shall be concurrently withdrawn from any Special District which has levied ad valorem taxes or other charges for the same services within the territory to be annexed that County Sanitation District No, will provide following annexation, to avoid an overlapping taxing entity. Section 5: The General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to establish procedures and fees for processing annexation of territory to the District. Said procedures may -6- "L-6" AGENDA ITEM #11(k) - DISTRICTS 2,3,5,7811 "L-6" include provisions for collection by the District of fees charged _ by other local and state agencies involved in the annexation process for submittal to said agencies by the District on behalf �..✓ of the annexation proponent. The District's staff is hereby directed to provide the proponents of any proposed annexation a copy of procedures and fee schedules established pursuant to the authority of this Section. Section 6: That the staff be directed to transmit to the Local Agency Formation Commission a certified copy of this Resolution. Section 7 : That the provisions of this Resolution shall become effective July 1, 1991, and shall apply to all annexations to the District on or after said date. Section 8: If any of the provisions of this Resolution or the application to any person or circumstance are held invalid by order of Court, the remainder of this Resolution or the application of such provision to other persons or other circumstances shall not be affected. Section 9: That Resolution No. 82- and all other Resolutions or Minute Orders in conflict herewith are hereby repealed and made of no further effect. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held July 17, 1991. (BS/RES91/RAN5.1-5) -7- "L-7" AGENDA ITEM #11(k) - DISTRICTS 2,3,5,7911 "L-7" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS a OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728-e127 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92706-7016 (714)962-2411 June 26, 1991 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 2 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Professional Engineering Services with Willdan Associates in Connection with Preparation of a Project Report on Santa Ana River Interceptor Relief Sewer, Contract No. 2-31 In accordance with the District's procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with Willdan Associates for the preparation of a project report for Santa Ana River Interceptor Relief Sewer, Contract No. 2-31, on an hourly-rate basis including labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed $56,700, as follows: Professional Services, (hourly rates including labor plus overhead at 167.5%) , not to exceed $ 34,300 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 18,300 Fixed Profit 4,100 TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed $ 56,700 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/Iry Pickler /s/John Collins Iry Fickler John Collins Chairman, District No. 2 Chairman pro tem, District No. 2 Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Thomas M. Dawes Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering Selection Committee "M" AGENDA ITEM #110 ) (1) - DISTRICT 2 "M" RESOLUTION NO. 91-130-2 APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ems' WILLDAN ASSOCIATES FOR PRE ARAT N F A PROJECT REPORT RE CONTRACT N . 2-3 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WILLDAN ASSOCIATES FOR PREPARATION OF A PROJECT REPORT TO EVALUATE ALIGNMENTS AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR A PORTION OF THE SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR, BETWEEN GROVE STREET AND YORBA PARK, TO BE KNOWN AS SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-31 k k k k k k k k k k k k k k WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with Willdan Associates for preparation of a project report to evaluate alternate alignments and make recommendations for a portion of the Santa Ana River Interceptor, between Grove Street and Yorba Park, to be known as Santa Ana River Interceptor Relief Sewer, Contract No. 2-31; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Board of Directors on May 8, 1991, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has negotiated and certified the final negotiated fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the proposed Professional Services Agreement is for a project which is a portion of the previously-approved 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The project is to be designed as per the Master Plan approval. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality "N-1" AGENDA ITEM #110 )(2) - DISTRICT 2 "N-1" Act of 1970, as amended, and Section 15163 of the Districts' Guidelines, a Final Program Environmental Impact Report on the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan covering this project was approved by the Districts' Boards of Directors on July 19, 1989; and, Section 2. That the certain Professional Services Agreement dated July 17, 1991. by and between County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County and Willdan Associates, for preparation of a project report to evaluate alternate alignments and make recommendations for a portion of the Santa Ana River Interceptor, between Grove Street and Yorba Park, to be known as Santa Ana River Interceptor Relief Sewer, Contract No. 2-31, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 3. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows: `✓ Professional Services, at hourly rates for labor plus overhead at 167.5%, not to exceed $ 34,300.00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 18,300.00 Fixed Profit 4,100.00 TOTAL, not to exceed $ 56,700.00 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held July 17, 1991. "N-2" AGENDA ITEM #110 ) (2) - DISTRICT 2 "N-2" RESOLUTION NO. 91-131-3 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS AND THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH THE LOS ALAMITOS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RE PAYMENT OF PROPORTIONAL ANNUAL TAX INCREMENT TO DISTRICT FOR SEWERAGE SERVICES WHEREAS, the City of Los Alamitos and the Redevelopment Agency of the City ' of Los Alamitos have proposed to adopt the Los Alamitos Redevelopment Project; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Community Redevelopment Law, California Health and Safety Code Sections 33000 et sec . , the Sanitation District's ad valorem taxes in the redevelopment project area will be frozen at the 1990-91 base year levy; all subsequent annual tax increments accruing to the redevelopment agency during 1 1 its life; and, WHEREAS, because the Sanitation District partially relies on ad valorem taxes to finance the cost of sewerage services which are escalating due to federally mandated requirements, energy impacts and inflationary trends; and, WHEREAS, recognizing that the freezing of taxes may result in inadequate ad valorem tax revenues to cover the cost of providing sewerage service to the redevelopment project areas, representatives of the City of Los Alamitos and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Alamitos have agreed to pay the District fifty percent (50%) of its historical proportional share of the annual tax increment accruing to the agency to defray the cost of said service, on the same basis as other properties in the District. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, 110-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(m) - DISTRICT 3 "0-1" DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Agreement dated July 17, 1991, by and between County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County and the City of Los Alamitos and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Alamitos, providing for payment to the District of fifty percent (50%) of its historical proportional share of the annual tax increment from property in the Los Alamitos Redevelopment Project to pay for escalating costs of sewerage service on the same basis as other properties in the District, be, and is hereby, approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of District No. 3 in form approved by the General Counsel. - PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held July 17, 1991. "0-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(m) - DISTRICT 3 "0-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY " P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION CO. . DATE_ July 17, 1991 INC. JOB: BAKER FORCE MAINS. FROM MAIN STREET PUMP STATION TO BRISTOL STREET, CONTRACT NO. 14-1-2 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 8,074.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - ADVERSE GRADE OF LATERAL HOUSE CONNECTION The Contractor was directed to excavate and reinstall two existing lateral house connections back to the property line in order to connect into the new Costa Mesa Sanitary District 8-inch VCP sewer at Stations Nos. 252+98 and 255+38 `r✓ (Sheet 7) . The new sewer line is at a higher elevation than the existing laterals which were not shown in profile on the plans. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,374.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - DUCT BANKS NOT AS SHOWN The Contractor was directed to relocate the 6-foot by 12-foot concrete structure from Station No. 288+95 to Station No. 288+93 (Sheet 11) because of telephone and electrical ducts crossing the trench at the location of the new structure. The utilities were not located as shown in the contract documents. Also, the bottom of the ducts were lower than shown which required adjusting the 42-inch DIP grade to pass under the stacked utility conduits. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. -ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,700.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days 11P-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(n) - DISTRICTS 7 & 14 "P-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY \� P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. N0. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION CO. . DATE July 17, 1991 INC. JOB: BAKER FORCE MAINS. FROM MAIN STREET PUMP STATION TO BRISTOL STREET. CONTRACT NO. 14-1-2 TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 8,074.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date January 28, 1991 Original Contract Time 360 Calendar Days Original Completion Date January 23, 1992 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time Not Applicable Revised Final Completion Due Date Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 5,773,395.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 7,600.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 8,074.00 Amended Contract Price $ 5,789,069.00 "P-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(n) - DISTRICTS 7 & 14 "P-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. N0. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION CO.. DATE July 17, 1991 INC. JOB: BAKER FORCE MAINS. FROM MAIN STREET PUMP STATION TO BRISTOL STREET, CONTRACT NO. 14-1-2 Board Authorization Date: July 17, 1991 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED BY: RECOMMENDED BY: ,p 8 f -� 6-/9-9/ �• 6 to-/9 9/ � Engineer Date Co struction Manager Date APPR D Y: APPROVED AS TO FORM: rector of Engineering Date General Counsel Date MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION CO., INC ACCEPTED BY: G Da e/ "P-3" AGENDA ITEM #11(n) - DISTRICTS 7 & 14 "P-3" RESOLUTION NO. 91- - `..�� ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCALYEAR 1991-92 FOR THE DISTRICT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF Uffi—M­N-7 OF TITLE 1 OF THE F R IA GOVERNMENT CODE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 FOR THE DISTRICT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF DIVISION 9 OF TITLE 1 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE R t t t f f t t t t R t t t WHEREAS., Article XIII B of the Constitution of the State of California as proposed by the Initiative Measure approved by the people at the special statewide election held on November 6, 1979, provides that the total annual appropriations subject to limitation of each local government shall not exceed the appropriations limit of such entity for the prior year adjusted for changes in the cost of living and population except as otherwise specifically provided for in said Article; and, WHEREAS, the State Legislature added Division 9 (commencing with Section 7900) to Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California to implement Article XIII B of the California Constitution; and, WHEREAS, Section 7910 of the Government Code provides that each year the governing body of each local jurisdiction shall , by resolution, establish Its appropriations limit for the following fiscal year pursuant to Article XIII B at a regularly-scheduled meeting or a noticed special meeting and that fifteen (15) days prior to such meeting, documentation used in the determination of the appropriations limit shall be available to the public; and, WHEREAS, Section 7902 (b) of the Government Code sets forth the method for determining the appropriations limit for each local ,jurisdiction for the 1991-92 fiscal year; and, "�-1" AGENDA ITEM #13(b)(1) (k) - DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7E11 110-11, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors wish to establish the appropriations limit ' for fiscal year 1991-92 for the District. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. _ of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER: Section 1: That it is hereby found and determined that the documentation used in the determination of the appropriations limit for County Sanitation District No. _ of Orange County, California, for fiscal year 1991-92, was available to the public in the Finance Department of said District at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date. Section 2: That the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. of Orange County, California, has determined that the percent change in California per capita personal income from the preceding year would be the cost of living factor to be used in calculating the County Sanitation District No. _ of Orange County, California's appropriations limit for the Fiscal Year 1991-92. Section 3: That the appropriations limit for fiscal year 1991-92 for County Sanitation District No. _ of Orange County, California, as established in accordance with Section 7902(b) of the California Government Code is $ which sum is within the maximum authorized spending limitation for fiscal year 1991-92. Section 4: The determination of the appropriation limit is based upon the best and most complete information available at this time. The District reserves the right to review and re-establish a new and different limit in the event that it subsequently determines that a modification of the limitation amount is appropriate. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held July 17, 1991. "0-2" AGENDA ITEM #13(b)(1)(k) - DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7&11 "Q-2" RESOLUTION NO. 91-125 AWARDING JOB NO. I-9 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR INTERPLANT PIPELINE AND UTILITY CORRIDOR, JOB NO. I-9 k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the proposed construction contract is for a project which is a portion of the Supplement No. 1 to Program Environmental Impact Report on the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The project Is to be constructed as per the Master Plan approval . In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and Section 15090 of the Districts' Guidelines, the Supplement to Program Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan covering this project was approved by the Boards of Directors on November 14, 1990; and, Section 2. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Director of Engineering that award of contract be made to Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich and Sons for Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9, and bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That the contract for Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9, be awarded to Colich Bros. , Inc. dba Colich and Sons, in the total amount of $21,328,600.00 in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of.District No. 1, acting for "R-1" AGENDA ITEM #16(h) - ALL DISTRICTS "R-1" itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel ; and, Section 5. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 17, 1991. "R-2" AGENDA ITEM #16(h) - ALL DISTRICTS "R-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS July 2, 1991 W ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA 11:00 a.m. 6 ADDENDA +0944 EWS AVENUE J Ag.GOA 012, FWNEAiN VALLEY.LALJMMA 92M.0127 B I D T A B U L A T I O N SHEET JOB NO. I-9 PROJECT TITLE Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor (I-9) PROJECT DESCRIPTION Installation of 120-inch effluent. 18-inch digester gas. 18-inch industrial water and fiber-optic interplant utilities and a portion of replacement outfall . ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $30,000.000 BUDGET AMOUNT $44,000,000 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. Colich & Sons, Gardena, CA $21,328,600.00 2. Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn $23,229,700.00 Constructors, Inc., Upland, CA 3. Steve Bubalo Construction, Monrovia, CA $23,840,000.00 4. Steve P. Rados, Santa Ana, CA $24,050,500.00 5. Kiewit Pacific, Santa Fe Springs, CA $24,599,000.00 6. Morris Knudson, Costa Mesa, CA $25,021,947.00 7. John Artukovich, Inc., Tempe, AZ $25,500.000.00 8. ARB, Long Beach, CA $26,186,459.00 9. KEC, Corona, CA $26,433,166.00* 10. McCarthy/Murray, Irvine, CA $26,770,795.00* 11. Las Vegas Paving, Las Vegas, NV $29,508,000.00 *Corrected Bid Results I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore recommend award to Colich & Sons, Inc. of Gardena, California in the bidZhoma/sM. $21 600.00 as the lowest and best bid. Dawes 0 Director of Engineering "R-3" AGENDA ITEM #16(h) - ALL DISTRICTS "R-3N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .1 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA July 10, 1991 IQI44 EW6<VENUE PO CUMRN FOUNTAIN VGIIFY,CALIFORNIA 2M 9212&fi127 STAFF REPORT CONTRACT BOAT SERVICES FOR OCEAN MONITORING AND SPECIAL STUDIES BID SPECIFICATION S-053 (REVISED) and BID SPECIFICATION S-054 (REVISED) SUMMARY The Districts are obligated to perform certain ocean monitoring tasks as a condition of our 301(h) modified NPDES ocean discharge permit. The Districts also electively conduct special studies to characterize our effect on the ocean environment. Staff recently advertised for contract boat services for supplemental ocean monitoring and special studies under: 1) "Marine Monitoring Vessel for Water Quality Surveying, Specification S-053 (REVISED)"; and 2) "Marine Monitoring Vessel for Coastal Waters, Specification S-054 `.J (REVISED)' Staff is recommending an award of Bid Specification S-053-R to MEC Analytical Systems, Inc.,for a not-to-exceed cost of$48,229 and to Seaventures for a not-to-exceed cost of $13,440. Staff is recommending an award of Bid Specification S-054-R to Enchanter, Inc., for $490.00/day for an estimated annual cost of $105,840 (based on an estimated 18 days of work per month for 12 months). BACKGROUND To comply with our NPDES ocean discharge permit and the California Ocean Plan, the Districts are required to monitor the County's coastal waters to ensure the protection of human health and the marine environment. In addition, many research projects are conducted annually by Districts' staff to better ensure that the quality of the receiving water and the County's beaches are being protected. These programs require the services of ocean research vessels and personnel with extensive knowledge of coastal environmental monitoring and the Districts' monitoring programs to conduct the work knowledgeably and safely. "T-1" AGENDA ITEM #18 - ALL DISTRICTS "T-I Since 1985 the Districts have used the professional contract services of Science Applications Intemational Corporation (SAIC) of La Jolla, California to perform the majority of tasks required by our permit. Water quality, sediment chemistry, benthic organisms, trawl and rig fishing, and fish histopathology are the principal field monitoring tasks that have been performed by SAIC. The Boards, at their June meeting, awarded a$1,856,923 contract to SAIC for year seven of the monitoring program for the monitoring year July 1, 1991, to June 30, 1992. In addition to the ongoing work by SAIC, Districts' staff, with the support of the contract ocean vessel "Enchanter IV" have been conducting special water quality studies, precise navigation to deploy sampling location marker buoys, nearshore bacterial sampling and back-up to SAIC during certain monitoring events. The existing contract with Enchanter Corporation is $4,800 per month for up to 13 days of work each month, plus $440 per day for work in excess of 13 days with a total maximum of $7,000 per month. Our team of ocean monitoring professionals has been put together to adequately characterize our effect on the marine environment and to support our continuing waiver from full secondary treatment. The changing conditions we face require that we re- evaluate our approach to monitoring from time-to-time. As described in the staff report last month supporting the SAIC contract amendment, Districts' staff will take over the water quality monitoring task from SAIC during SAIC's year seven contract. This is being ^ done to provide closer oversight and control of this important monitoring task, to take l.r� advantage of the flexibility that a Districts'-conducted program will imply, and to provide close supervision by Districts' staff to the changes that are anticipated to occur in water quality monitoring as a result of our ongoing negotiations with EPA to amend and improve the ocean monitoring program. In addition, our experience in conducting the water quality monitoring tasks will help us to decide if we should take on more elements of the ocean monitoring program. Staff's preliminary thinking is that this may be a good idea for the sake of cost effectiveness, tighter quality control and flexibility. But until we complete the year seven water quality monitoring tasks, we will not be in a position to complete our evaluation. Beyond the change in the SAIC contract, staff anticipates an increased need for special studies during 1991 and 1992. EPA's review of our 1989 Ocean Discharge Permit renewal application will likely be completed during this time frame. Also, staff has reviewed the National Research Council Report "Monitoring Southern California's Coastal Waters" released in October, 1990. Based on this, R appears to be prudent to electively conduct additional special studies and monitoring tasks to confirm and support our original decision to apply for a second 5-year EPA waiver from full secondary treatment. It is for these reasons that Districts' staff advertised for two service contracts for supplemental ocean monitoring and special studies. "T-2" AGENDA ITEM #18 - ALL DISTRICTS "T-2" DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION RE MARINE MONITORING VESSEL FOR WATER QUALITY SURVEYING, SPECIFICATION NO. 5-053 (REVISED). As discussed above, the water quality monitoring tasks required by our ocean discharge permit are to be conducted by the Districts instead of SAIC beginning in year seven of the contract with SAIC for ocean monitoring (Monitoring year July 1, 1991 to June 30, 1992). The water quality monitoring program documents water quality in the vicinity of the Zone of Initial Dilution (ZID) boundary of our ocean outfall, at areas beyond the ZID where discharge impacts might reasonably be expected, and at control stations outside the influence of the outfall. To accomplish this task, nine stations are analyzed monthly and seventeen stations analyzed quarterly, taking one day to sample all stations. Direct measurement of some parameters and in-lab analysis of other parameters are conducted at all stations. Because of the large size of the instrumentation and sampler, the crew size, and the volume of samples collected, we must deploy a vessel large enough to handle the task safely and effectively. During quarterly water quality sampling days when the task is very large, 17 stations, two vessels are required to accomplish all of the sampling in one day. Our oceanographers believe it is desirable to obtain all samples on the same day so that we have a "snapshot" of the conditions on that day at all 17 stations. Bids were solicited from four companies to provide this service. The companies were asked for quotes for 1) price-per-day for vessel, water quality sampling crew and operating crew and training; and 2) price-per-day for a vessel, water quality sampling crew and operating crew; and 3) price-per-day for vessel and operating crew only. The crew-only option was requested because in three months, the Districts' staff will be able to perform the water quality sampling collection with its own water quality equipment and sampling crew. Two companies, MEC and Seaventures responded with the following bids: Cost per Day (1) (2) (3) Vessel, operating Vessel, operating, Vessel & crew, sampling crew & sampling operating crew & training crew crew only Seaventures Not qualified $4,282.00 $1,120.00 for training MEC $6,583.00 $5,696.00 $3,350.00 "T-3" AGENDA ITEM #18 - ALL DISTRICTS "T-3" Bids were requested from four companies with two responding: Seaventures and Enchanter, Inc. The companies were asked to bid total price per day including the vessel and the operating crew. The bids were: Seaventures $1,120.00/day Enchanter, Inc. $ 490.00/day Enchanter complied with all the bid specifications. Seaventures lacked the precision navigational equipment specified in Section IV of Technical Specification #4 and which is required by the EPA to achieve accurate positioning of the vessel when taking samples. Enchanter's vessel has proven to be adequate for the sampling performed in prior years. The Enchanter's skipper has extensive knowledge of environmental sampling and the Districts' monitoring programs. Seaventures has informally protested award of the contract to Enchanter, alleging that Enchanter does not comply with all Coast Guard requirements. The General Counsel's office has reviewed this allegation and found Enchanter to be in compliance with all necessary requirements. A copy of the General Counsel's Memorandum is attached hereto. Staff recommends the contract be awarded to Enchanter, Inc., the low bidder, at a cost of$490.00 per day, meeting all the specifications, for an estimated annual cost of $105,840 based on an estimated 18 days of work per month for 12 months. This includes managerial assistance for the contractors under Specification No. s-054 (Revised) . V� "T-5" AGENDA ITEM #18 - ALL DISTRICTS "T-5" RESOLUTION NO. 91-127 AWARDING CONTRACTS FOR MARINE MONITORING VESSEL FOR WATERQUALITY SURVEYING, SP�FIC;YA 1UN NU. Z)-U53 REVISED A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACTS FOR MARINE MONITORING VESSEL FOR WATER QUALITY SURVEYING, SPECIFICATION NO. 5-053 (REVISED) TO NEC ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS, INC. AND SEAVENTURES f f t x � x x ■ x a : � x x s * e The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Laboratory Manager that award of contracts be made to NEC Analytical Systems, Inc. and Seaventures for Marine Monitoring Vessel for Water Quality Surveying, Specification No. 5-053 (Revised), and the bid tabulation and recommendation, and proposals submitted for said specification are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That said contracts for Marine Monitoring Vessel for Water Quality Surveying, Specification No. 5-053 (Revised), be awarded at the following costs per day, to NEC Analytical Systems, Inc. for the period July 1, 1991 to June 30, 1992, for a total amount not to exceed $54,812.00; and to Seaventures for the period beginning September 1, 1991 to June 30, 1992, for a total amount not to exceed $13,440.00, in accordance with the terms and conditions of said specification and the bid proposals therefor: COST PER DAY Vessel , operating Vessel , operating Vessel crew, sampling crew crew 8 sampling operating crew 8 training crew only NEC $6,583.00 5,696.00 3,350.00 Seaventures Not qualified $4,282.00 $1,120.00 for training "U-1" AGENDA ITEM #1II(2) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-1" Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said contracts, in form approved by the General Counsel ; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said specification are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held July 17, 1991. "U-2" AGENDA ITEM #18(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS A ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA 10W EWx AVEWE v0 BOX BW1 1-ft.ry FouEnuN VAwir.uuromu exree.nxr 01.18E2.xA11 BID TABULATION RE: SPECIFICATION NO. S-053 (Revised) , Marine Monitoring Vessel for Water Quality Surveying BID OPENING: 11 :00 a.m. , June 11, 1991 COST PER DAY vessel, operating vessel, operating vessel a crew, sampling crew crew a sampling operating crew & training crew only Seaventures Not qualified $4,282.00 $1,120.00 for training MEC $6,583.00 5,696 .00 3, 350.00 It is hereby recommended that award of contract for Marine Monitoring Vessel for Water Quality Surveying, Specification No. S-053 (Revised) , be made to MEC Analytical Systems, Inc. for the period July 1, 1991 to June 30, 1992, for a total amount not to exceed $48,229.00; and to Seaventures for the period beginning September 1, 1991 to June 30, 1992, for a total amount not to exceed $13,440.00. Lo 18'8ngermano Laboratory Manager "V" AGENDA ITEM #18(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "V" RESOLUTION NO. 91-128 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR MARINE MONITORING VESSEL FOR COASTAL WATERS, SPECIFICATION ` NO. S-054 REVISED A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR MARINE MONITORING VESSEL FOR COASTAL WATERS, SPECIFICATION NO. S-054 (REVISED) TO ENCHANTER, INC. * k k k k k * * k * * k * k k * * k The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Laboratory Manager that award of contract be made to Enchanter, Inc. for Marine Monitoring Vessel for Coastal Waters, Specification No. S-054 (Revised) , and the bid tabulation and recommendation, and proposals submitted for said specification are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That said contract for Marine Monitoring Vessel for Coastal - Waters, Specification No. S-054 (Revised) , be awarded to The Enchanter, Inc. at a cost Of $490.00 per day, for the period July 1, 1991 to June 30, 1992, for an estimated annual cast of $105,840.00, in accordance with the terns and conditions of said specification and the bid proposal therefor; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said contract, in form approved by the General Counsel ; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said specification are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held July 17, 1991. "W" AGENDA ITEM #18 - ALL DISTRICTS "W" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS M ORANGE COUNTY, CAUEONNIA 1a awsAWNM � / Go.Bw 8127 �I f08MAMVAYFY.GLIF0188A 82Y2&8127 0101822R 11 BID TABULATION RE: SPECIFICATION NO. 5-054 (Revised) , Marine Monitoring Vessel for Coastal Waters BID OPENING: 11:00 a.m. , June 11, 1991 Cost per daV Enchanter, Inc. S 490.00 �J Seaventures 1,120.00 It is hereby recommended that award of contract for Marine Monitoring Vessel for Coastal Waters, Specification No. 5-054 (Revised) , be made to Enchanter, Inc. for the period July 1, 1991 to June 30, 1992, for an estimated annual cost of $105,840.00. Lo/ui geatf rmano Laboratory Manager "X" AGENDA ITEM #18(b) - ALL DISTRICTS ""X" RESOLUTION NO. 91-129 AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN NATIONAL WATER RESEARCH INSTITUTE `a►� A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN THE JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT CREATING THE NATIONAL WATER RESEARCH INSTITUTE, BETWEEN THE SANITATION DISTRICTS. IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT, ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY AND SAN JUAN BASIN AUTHORITY z z z z z z z z z z z z z z WHEREAS, a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement has been proposed which would create an entity known as the National Water Research Institute; and, WHEREAS, the purpose of said National Water Research Institute is to undertake research, development and implementation of public water projects for the purpose of developing and conserving water and improving the quality of water, preventing or remediating degredation of water quality and efficiently using water resources in Orange County, all of which may be of additional benefit on a regional , state-wide and national level ; and, WHEREAS, the parties to such agreement include County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Irvine Ranch Water District, Municipal Water District of Orange County, Orange County Water District and San Juan Basin Authority, such agencies having the power to establish such an institute; and, WHEREAS, funding for the work of said National Water Research Institute is anticipated to be provided by both private and public entities interested in the work of the institute; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County have determined that participation in the National Water Research Institute is in the best interest of the Districts "Y-1" AGENDA ITEM #20 - ALL DISTRICTS "Y 1" and citizens of Orange County, and 1s consistent with the Districts' 30-Year Wastewater Management Action Plan, "2020 VISION". \/ NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement creating an entity known as the National Water Research Institute, dated June 24, 1991, by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, Irvine Ranch Water District, Municipal Water District of Orange County, Orange County Water District and San Juan Basin Authority, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment of an amount not to exceed $50,000.00 per year, as the Districts' equal share of the National Water Research Institute's administrative budget, be, and is hereby, authorized; and, Section 3. That funding participation by the Districts in specific projects of the National Water Research Institute shall be approved by the Boards of Directors on a project-specific basis; and, Section 4. That the Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County be, and is hereby, authorized and directed to appoint the Districts' representative and alternates to the Board of Directors of the National Water Research Institute; and, Section 5. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for Itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel . PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held July 17, 1991. Y-2" AGENDA ITEM #20 - ALL DISTRICTS "Y-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS, .1 ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA INITIAL STUDY ,aea.riusAv[Bu2 Po Box 6+n (To Be Completed by Lead Agency) rcunTM VAueT.f MFMRABP)2B-B 127 n,A s822a„ I. Background A. Name of Proponent County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 and 2 B. Address and Phone Number of Proponent 10844 Ellis Avenue Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California (714) 962-2411 C. Contact Person Jean Tappan (714) 962-2411 Ext. 5001 D. Title and Location of Project Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30 Construction of a sewer line to serve the Cities of Santa Ana --� and Orange in the area bordered by LaVeta Avenue on the north Parker Street on the east, Memory Garden on the south and the Santa Ana Freeway and the Santa Ana River on the West E. Description of Project This project is a realignment of the Orange Sub Trunk Relief Sewer, identified in the Districts' 1986 and 1989 Master Plans and Master Plan EIRs. The Orange Sub Trunk, planned to constructed in La Veta Avenue, will be deleted in favor of this larger project in Memory Lane (ext.). Also eliminated will be City of Orange planned sewers in La Vets and the City of Santa Ana planned sewers in Memory Lane. This joint project would result in (1) less net sewer construction, and (2) less cast. All work is in public streets or alleys. - -1- "AA-1- AGENDA ITEM #35(a)(4) - DISTRICTS 1 E 2 "AA-1" II. Guidelines A. Does the proposed activity qualify as a project as defined in Section 28. Yes X No (If activity does not qualify as project, do not complete remainder of form). B. Does the project qualify as: 1. Ministerial (Section 6) Yes _ No X 2. Emergency (Section 13) Yes _ No X 3. A feasibility or planning study (Section 33) Yes _ No X 4. Categorically exempt pursuant to Article 8 of the State Guidelines (Section 40) Yes _ No X 5. Involves another agency which constitutes the lead agency (Section 36) Yes _ No X If yes, identify lead agency: (If yes has been checked for any of the above, an Environmental Impact Assessment/Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration need not be prepared). III. Environmental Impacts (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe' answers are required on attached sheets). Yes Maybe No A. Earth. Will the proposal result in: 1. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X 2. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? X 3. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X 4. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X 5. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X -2- "AA-2" AGENDA ITEM #35(2)(4) - DISTRICTS 1 & 2 "AA-2" Yes Maybe No 6. Changes in desposition or erosion of beach sands or changes in silation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X 7. Exposure of people or property to geological hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure or similar hazard? X B. Air. Will the proposal result in: 1. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X 2. The creation of objectionable odors? X 3. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X C. Water. Will the proposal result in: _ 1. Change in currents or the course of 'direction of water movements in either marine or fresh water? X 2. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns or the rate and amount of surface runoff? X 3. Alterations to the course of flow of flood waters? X 4. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X 5. Discharge into surface waters or in any alteration of surface water quality, including, but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X 6. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? _ _ X 7. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X 3"AA-3" AGENDA ITEM #35(a)(4) - DISTRICTS 1 & 2 "AA-3" Yes Maybe No 8. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X 9. Exposure of people or property to related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? X D. Plant Life. Will proposal result in: 1. Change in the diversity of species or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops and aquatic plants)? X 2. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? X 3. Introduction of new species of plants into an area or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X 4. Reduction in acreage of any agriculture crop? X E. Animal Life. Will proposal result in: 1. Change in the diversity of species or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects? X 2. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? X 3. Introduction of new species of animals into an area or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? X 4. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X F. Noise. Will the proposal result in: 1. Increase in existing noise levels? X 2. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X G. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce light or glare? X "AA-4" AGENDA ITEM a35(a)(4) - DISTRICTS 1 & 2 "AA.-4" -4- Yes Maybe No `a✓ H. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X I. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: 1. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X 2. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X J. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: 1. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X 2. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? X K. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the human population of an area? X L. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? X M. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: 1. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X 2. Effects on existing parking facilities or demand for new parking? X 3. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? X 4. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X 5. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X "AA-5" AGENDA ITEM #35(a)5(4) - DISTRICTS 1 & 2 "AA-5" Yes Maybe No 6. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X N. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: 1. Fire protection? x 2. Police protection? x 3. Schools? x 4. Parks or other recreational facilities? X S. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X 6. Other governmental service? X 0. Energy. Will the proposal result in: 1. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X 2. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy or require the development of new sources of energy? X P. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to the following utilities: 1. Power or natural gas? X 2. Communications systems? x 3. Water? X 4. Sewer or septic tanks? x 5. Storm water drainage? x 6. Solids waste and disposal? X Q. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: 1. Creation of any health hazard or potential \/ health hazard (excluding mental health?) - X "AA-G" AGENDA ITEM #35(a) (4) - DISTRICTS i 6 2 "AA-6 -6- Yes Maybe No `..� 2. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? X R. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to the public view? X S. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an Impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X T. Cultural Resources. 1. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archeaological site? X 2. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? X 3. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? X 4. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? X U. Mandatory Findings of Significance. 1. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal , or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? x "AA-7" AGENDA ITEM #35(a) (4) - DISTRICTS 1 & 2 "AA-7" -7- Yes Maybe No 2. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of �./ long-term, environmental goals? (A short- term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time, while long-term impacts will endure well into the future). X 3. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited but cumulative considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant). X 4. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X IV. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation See attached sheet. V. Discussion of Zoning Compatibility See attached sheet VI. Determination (To be completed by Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. X Date: June 20, 1991 COU ITATION DISTRICTS OF 0 NGE �NTYYnn 40masM. Dawes Director of Engineering "AA-8" AGENDA ITEM #35(E) (4) - DISTRICTS I & 2 "AA-8" EXPLANATIONS OF "YES" AND "MAYBE" ANSWERS ON INITIAL STUDY Environmental Impacts: A.2. The sewer will be installed underground within trenches generally in streets requiring displacements and recompaction of soil. A.6 . This project will require the construction of sewer underneath the existing Santa Ana River channel. C.4. Throughout the construction period, surface drainage may be diverted, temporarily. Within the Santa Ana River, the work will be done in the dry season. H. This project will provide sewer capacity for planned developments within the Cities of Orange and Santa Ana. K. This project will provide sewage capacity for proposed developments within the Cities of Orange and Santa Ana. L. The project will serve proposed developments in the Cities of Orange and Santa Ana which may include provisions for �..� additional housing. N. 3 . This project will serve planned new development in the Cities of Orange and Santa Ana which may include new housing necessitating additional need for schools. N.S. This project will serve planned new development in the Cities of Orange and Santa Ana which may include new housing necessitating planned temporary detours of roads. P.I . The project will provide sewer capacity for proposed and developments in the Cities of Orange and Santa Ana. P.4 . U. 3. This project will provide sewer capacity for proposed new developments in the Cities of Orange and Santa Ana. The cities have determined that these projects are compatible with city master plans. "AA-9" AGENDA ITEM #35(a) (4) - DISTRICTS 1 & 2 "AA-9" ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Name of Project: Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30 Location: Within the Cities of Orange and Santa Ana, generally bounded by LaVeta on the north, Parker on the east, Memory Gardens on the south and the Santa Ana Freeway and Santa Ana River on the west Entity or Person Undertaking Project: A. District County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 and 2 B. Other Staff Determination: The Districts' staff, having undertaken and completed an Initial Study of this project in accordance with Section 15063 of the Amendments to the California Environmental Quality Act, for the purpose of ascertaining whether the proposed project might have significant effect an the environment, has reached the following conclusion: _ 1. The project will not have a significant long term effect on the environment because of the mitigation measures incorporated; therefore, a Negative Declaration can be prepared. X 2. The project could have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, an EIR will be required. June 20 1991 � Tate omas awes Director of Engineering "BB" AGENDA ITEM #35(a) (4) - DISTRICTS 1 & 2 "BB" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS M ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA June 20, 1991 Ip ELL15AVENUE fla.6ox 612J WUNIAiN VALLEY FCRMA 92926 Ot<19622a11 STAFF REPORT Supplement No. 2 to 1989 Programmatic Environmental Impact Report Re Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30 DISTRICTS 1 AND 2 This project is proposed as a joint project between Districts 1 and 2, together with the Cities of Santa Ana and Orange. The 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, as well as the earlier 1986 District No. 2 Master Plan, identified the need to parallel the Orange Subtrunk, extending from the Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI) , easterly under the Santa Ana River and the Santa Ana Freeway in La Veta Avenue to the intersection of Flower Street, at an estimated cost of $330,000 (1989 dollars) . Since the master plan was completed, and particularly in the last year, newly-planned large developments in both the City of Orange and the City of Santa Ana have been identified which will necessitate the construction of a larger parallel line than originally envisioned, possibly extending it east of the previously planned terminus at Flower Street. The large developments include major office complexes in the cities of Santa Ana and Orange adjacent to Main Place, and large developments both north and south of La Veta Avenue in the City of Orange. Staff has investigated the regional sewering responsibilities with the Cities of Orange and Santa Ana and all agree that a realigned joint project would best serve the needs of both cities under a negotiated cost-sharing agreement. Sanitation District No. 2 operates the Orange Subtrunk in La Veta Avenue, discussed above. That subtrunk was to have been paralleled to serve identified needs northerly of La Veta Avenue. Southerly of La Veta Avenue, primarily within the City of Santa Ana, District No. 1 operates trunk sewers in Bristol Street and Main Street which drain from north to south. Those sewers are identified as having adequate capacity to serve identified projects in Santa Ana. However, in both cities the proposed development is now substantially larger than previously anticipated in the 1986 and 1989 Master Plans. Within Santa Ana, projects include an expansion of the Bekins office building, Fidelity Federal property, a large expansion of Main Place and within the Town and Country area and Main Street Concourse. Those expansions may range to nearly 10 million square feet, including over 1200 hotel rooms. Additional large expansions are planned in Orange, both north and south of La Veta Avenue. Staff believes that while the Bristol Street and Main Street sewers, previously calculated to have adequate capacity, could still serve District No. 1 needs, that capacity might be better saved for future projects in the center of the City of Santa Ana to preclude the necessity of paralleling lines in those major streets. "Z-1" AGENDA ITEM #35(a) (3) - DISTRICTS 1 & 2 "Z-1" Staff Report June 20, 1991 Page Two `%./ The staffs of the Cities and the Districts have identified an alternative to constructing the Orange Subtrunk relief and various major sewer construction projects in both of the cities. That project would be the Memory Lane Interceptor which would begin at the SARI line, extend easterly under the Santa Ana River, easterly in Memory Lane to Parker Street and north in Parker Street to La Veta Avenue. The final terminus would be the intersection of Batavia Street and La Veta Avenue where major City of Orange sewers would be intercepted, thereby eliminating the need to build sewers paralleling the Orange Subtrunk and city sewers in La Veta Avenue as well as planned City of Santa Ana sewers which would deliver water to the District's trunks in Main Street and Bristol Street. Staff has estimated that the cost of the Orange Subtrunk paralleling would be approximately $800,000. The staff of the City of Orange has estimated that their sewer needs would total close to $1 million, while Santa Ana sewer needs may range to above $2 million. The estimated cost of the Memory Lane Interceptor is about $4.1 million, equivalent to the cost of other sewering alternatives. However, the benefit to the District would be the preservation of existing capacity in District 1 trunk sewers for future needs. Subject to approval of the City Councils, City staffs are recommending that Orange contribute $700,000 and Santa Ana $1,300,000 to the project. The remaining funding would be divided between Districts I and 2, each paying half. This appears to be an equitable division. The project would have to be started soon so that portions of the project could be constructed prior to major street work, primarily in Santa Ana. It is anticipated that the project would be constructed in phases over the next couple of years. Because the proposed project alignment differs from that included in the 1989 Master Plan, a supplement to the 1989 Environmental Impact Report analyzing the new alignment is necesary. If approved by the Directors, a subsequent amendment to the Master Plan would follow. TMD:sjl ENG/D2:SR.1.1-2 Z-2" AGENDA ITEM #35(a) (3) - DISTRICTS 1 8 2 "Z-2" " COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 1�/ \ OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 l I 10844 ELLIS.FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 m"4'cf cW"� (714)962-2411 June 26, 1991 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 and 2 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Professional Environmental and Engineering Services with Boyle Engineering Corporation in Connection with Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30 In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with Boyle Engineering Corporation for the preparation of CEQA documentation, design, engineering and construction support services for Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30, on an hourly-rate basis including labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants fee and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed $223,330.00. Professional Services, (hourly rates including labor plus overhead at 156%), not to exceed $137,100 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 1,900 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 67,180 Fixed Profit. 17,150 TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed 3, 30 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/Dan Griset /s/Charles E. Puckett Dan Griset, Chairman Charles E. Puckett, Chairman pro tem District No. 1 District No. 1 Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Iry Pickler /s/John Collins Iry Pickler, Chairman John Collins, hairman pro em District No. 2 District No. 2 Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Thomas M. Dawes Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering Selection Committee "CC" AGENDA ITEM #35(b) (1) - DISTRICTS 1 & 2 "CC" RESOLUTION NO. 91-132 APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BOY BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR PREPARATIO OF SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 TO EIR ON AMENDMENT N . 1 TO 1989 MASTER PLAN AND FOR DESIGN AND ONSTRUC- N SUPPORT SERVICES RE CO TRA N0. 2- A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 AND 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR PREPARATION OF SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 TO PROGRAM EIR ON AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 1989 COLLECTION, TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES MASTER PLAN, AND FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES RE MEMORY LANE INTERCEPTOR, CONTRACT NO. 2-30 * * k k k t k * k t t * t t t k * * WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 and 2 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures, an agreement has been negotiated with Boyle Engineering Corporation for preparation of Supplement No. 2 to the Program Environmental Impact Report on Amendment No. 1 to the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, and for planning, design and construction support services re Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of Directors on April 10, 1991, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has certified the final negotiated fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 and 2 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Professional Services Agreement dated July 17, 1991, by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 and 2 and Boyle "DD-1" AGENDA ITEM, #35(b) (2) - DISTRICTS 1 8 2 "DD-1" Engineering Corporation, for preparation of Supplement No. 2 to the Program Environmental Impact Report on Amendment No. 1 to the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, and for planning, design and construction support services re Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract N. 2-30, Is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows: Professional Services, at hourly rates for labor plus overhead at 156%, not to exceed $137,100.00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 1,900.00 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 67,180.00 Fixed Profit 17,150.00 TOTAL, not to exceed $223,330.00 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for District No. 2, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel . PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held July 17, 1991. "DD-2" AGENDA ITEM #35(b)(2) - DISTRICTS 1 & 2 "DD-2" RESOLUTION NO. 91-133-7 \� AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 7-11-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR RELOCATION OF MICHELSON PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 7-11-2 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. In accordance with the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, the Board of Directors, on March 13, 1991, authorized filing a Notice of Exemption for Relocation of Michelson Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-2; and, Section 2. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the `../ Board of Directors by the Districts' Director of Engineering that award of contract be made to Mitchell Pacific Constructors, Inc. for Relocation of Michelson Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-2, and bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section .3. That the contract for Relocation of Michelson Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-2, be awarded to Mitchell Pacific Constructors, Inc. in the total amount of $1,827,136.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, In form approved by the General Counsel ; and, Section 5. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. `✓ PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held July 17, 1991. "EE-l " AGENDA ITEM #40(f) - DISTRICT 7 "EE-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS, W ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA June 25, 1991 1 B EUIS AVENUE 11:00 a.m. ?C.eox E+27 4 ADDENDA FOUNTAIN VAUEY.CAUFOANHA 2272 e v,A�sea.aan BID TABULATION 5 H E E T CONTRACT NO. 7-11-2 PROJECT TITLE Relocation of Michelson Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Construction of new lift station and appurtenant facilities, plus abandonment of old lift station. ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $3,000,000.00 BUDGET AMOUNT $2,600,000.00 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. Mitchell Pacific Constructors, Inc. $1,827,136.00 Palm Springs, CA 2. Advanco Constructors, Divison of Zurn $1,862,442.00 Constructors, Inc., Upland, CA 3. Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, Ontario, Ca $1,903,454.00 4. Scott Company of California, Gardena, CA $2,081,652.00 5. BFI Constructors, Santa Ana, CA - $2,133,185.00 6. Colich & Sons, Gardena, CA $2,137,368.00 7. Schuler Engineering Corp. , Riverside, CA $2,232,878.00 8. Amelco Mechanical , Gardena, CA $2,239,899.00 9. Channel Constructors, Inc., Irwindale, CA $2,243,495,00 10. Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Sunland, CA $2,282,195.00 11. Bernards Bros., Inc. , San Fernando, CA $2,350,000.00 I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Mitchell Pacific Constructors, Inc. of Palm Springs, California in the bid amount of $1,827,136.00 as the lowest and best bid. /// �/,1 ` homas M. Dawes Director of Engineering "EE-2" AGENDA ITEM #40(f) - DISTRICT 7 "EE-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 39 59 69 7, 119 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON JUNE 129 1991 PNRATIpN i5we°lu.e p°psJ 'SMx 188t p�AGE C� ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on June 12. 1991, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for i - Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S. 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: Dan Griset, Chairmen x Robert Richardson x Charles E. Puckett, Chairman pro tem Richard B. Edgar x Fred Barrera —Gene Beyer x Roger Stanton —Don R. Roth _James A. Wenner _James Ferryman DISTRICT NO. 2: x Iry Pickler, Chairman _Fred Hunter =John Collins, Chairman pro tem George Scott x Fred Barrera —Gene Beyer x Bob Bell Barry Denes x A.B. -Buck- Catlin __Chris Harty x William D. Mahoney _James H. Flora x Robert H. Main Norman Culver —Carrey J. Nelson x Glenn Parker :Arthur G. Newton _Carol Downey a Niguel Pulido _Dan Griset x Mark Schwing John M. Gullixson z Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 3: x Sal A. Sapien, Chairman _Harry M. Dotson x Peter Green, Chai rlmn pro tem _Earle Robitaille x Walter K. Bowman Cecilia L. Age x A.B. -Buck- Catlin _Chris Herby x John Collins _George Scott x Norman Culver _Robert H. Main 7--Burnie Dunlap _Garrey J. Nelson x James V. Evans Margie L. Rice x James H. Flora --William D. Mahoney z Don R. Griffin _Rhonda J. McCune z Pat McGuigan _Robert Richardson x Keith A. Nelson _Eva G. Miner z Iry Pickier Fred Hunter z Roger Stanton —Don R. Roth z Charles Sylvia —Alice Jempsa Edna Wilson x Frank Laszlo DISTRICT NO. 5: x Evelyn Hart, Chairmen mm—John Pluer x Phil Sansone, Chairman pro tem John C. Cox, Jr. X Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 6: x James A. Wahner, Chairman _Dick Sherrick z Ruthelyn Plummer, Chai mn pro tem Evelyn Hart z Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 7: x Richard B. Edgar, Chair mn Charles E. Puckett x James A. Wenner, Chairman pro ten —Nate Reade z Fred Barrera —Gene Beyer x John C. Cox, Jr. —Ruthelyn Plummer z Robert Richardson _Miguel Pulido 7--Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton _Sally Anne Sheridan _Barry Hammond DISTRICT NO. 11: x Grace Winchell, Chairman Linda Moulton-Patterson x Jack Kelly, Chairman pro tem —Jim Silva x Roger Stanton —Don R. Roth • DISTRICT NO. 13: a William D. Earle, Chairman Fred Hunter z Fred Barrera, Chai roan pro tem —Gene Beyer z John M. Gullixson —Mark Schwing z Glenn Parker —Burnie Dunlap xbon R. Roth —Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chairman _Darryl Miller x Sally Anne Sheridan, Chaimmn pro tem Barry Hammond x Fred Barrera —Gene Beyer x Leslie A. Pontious Richard B. Edgar x Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton -2- O6/12/91 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: - J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, 1 ' Rita J. Brown, Board Secretary, Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Corinne Clawson, Patti Gorczyka, Gary Hasenstab, Ed Hodges, Penny Kyle, Irwin Haydock, Steve Hovey, Charles Nichols, Bob ooten, Adriana Renescu, Lou Sangermano, Jack Vincent, Mark Esquer, John Dettle, Chuck Winsor OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel , Betty Mrgudish, Jamel Oemir, Walt Howard, Bill Knopf, Phil Stone, Margie Rice Y Y ► Y f Y Y Y Y Y Y Y t ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman reviewed a letter Report of the Joint Chairman he had sent to the State Department of Health Services proposing that the Sanitation Districts appoint one of their Board members to the States. Stringfellow Advisory Commission in lieu of a representative from the California League of Cities. Mr. Catlin reported that he had discussed this with the League, and there appeared to be a consensus that inasmuch as the Orange County cities affected by the Stringfellow program are represented on the Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County; and since the treated Stringfellow wastewater is ultimately disposed of through the Sanitation Districts' system, it might be more appropriate for the Sanitation Districts to appoint a representative to this Commission. The Joint Chairman also reported on a proposed resolution submitted to the League of Cities opposing legislation establishing costly and unnecessary requirements for ocean discharge of treated wastewater. He advised that a resolution had previously been drafted and submitted to the Resolutions Committee of the League of California Cities in opposition to AB 854, the California Coastal Sanctuary Act of 1991. However, that legislation was subsequently revised to eliminate the provision prohibiting treated wastewater below the secondary level after the year 2004. Therefore, a revised draft resolution was prepared to be more generic and oppose all future legislation requiring full secondary treatment. A copy of the new draft resolution was included in the Directors' meeting folders. He noted that this resolution would be introduced the following evening at the League meeting. The Joint Chairman then announced that the Building Committee was scheduled to meet on Thursday, June 20th, at 5:30 p.m. Chairman Catlin also called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, June 26th, at 5:30 p.m. , and invited Directors Sally Anne t / Sheridan and Charles Sylvia to attend and participate in the discussions. �✓ -3- 06/12/91 The Joint Chairman reminded Directors that the regular July Board Meeting had been rescheduled from July 10th to July 17th at 7:30 p.m. due to the League of California Cities' Conference in Monterey conflicting with the regularlyscheduled Board Meeting date. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported on the Report of the General Manager Districts' 1990, four-volume Annual Report. He advised that this report is required as one of the conditions of the the Districts' NPDES Permit issued jointly by the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Mr. Sylvester further reported that this was the first year that a summary of the four-volume report had been prepared and noted that a copy was included in the Directors' meeting folders. He reviewed several of the key pages of the Executive Summary with particular attention to Page 5 which shows the results of the Districts' five-year monitoring program relative to the impacts of wastewater discharge on the ocean. The findings indicate that there are negligible, if any, _ impacts on the ocean. The General Manager advised that additional copies of the Executive Summary of the 1990 Annual Report were available at the Directors' request. Mr. Sylvester then commented on current budget deliberations in Sacramento relative to funding the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) , which is one of the many agencies that regulate the Districts' activities. Heretofore, the SWRCB has been essentially funded out of General Fund monies by the State. In recent years they have started levying fees, and, currently, about 10% of their $44 million budget is funded by fees levied �..J against POTWs like the Districts. He advised that the Governor and the Legislature have agreed to totally remove the SWRCB from the General Fund and require that they be fully funded by user fees levied against the dischargers. Accordingly, a fee has been proposed of $9.25 per 1.000 gallons per day of volume discharged, which would increase the Districts' annual fee from the current amount of $3,100 to $2.5 million. Through the California Association of Sanitation Agencies, dischargers are trying to obtain some equitability in the assessment of the proposed fees by the SWRCB. It is felt that there should be some relationship between the fee charged and the service provided. The larger dischargers don't believe they would receive service equal to the high charges they would be assessed under the proposed schedule. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 8, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 8, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. • DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the `.../ regular meeting held May B, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -4- 06/12/91 DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or l / Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 8, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 8, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 8, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 31 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 8, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 8, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 8, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and individual Vistrictla ms That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 5/08/91 5/22/91 ALL DISTRICTS ToTEF- p—erating Fund - $1,124,105.02 $ 681,471.30 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 510,411.79 4,628,931.50 Joint Working Capital Fund - 215,947.91 440,380.47 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 6,260.02 116,890.09 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 195.34 -0- I N0. - 1,826,003.84 30,862.96 WTkTC7-F 3 - 28,851.66 18,131.44 1FITTUMM-5 - 1,564.82 26,402.63 19 - 133.79 686.97 UrFTNTff_9ff'._7 - 304,3D1.22 31,427.72 bI9TffYCT F6-I1 - 30,149.36 6,072.70 T I - 35.99 -0- 1 T 9 - 1,337,418.25 9,925.37 Ib�T PfTFFdS­._S 8 6 JOINT - 1,756.59 351.65 DISTRICTS 7 - 2,352.13 -0- T N 14 JOINT - 5 075.97 2 054.91 Director Frank Laszlo requested that his abstention from voting be made a matter of record. -5- O6/12/91 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase of Thir een 315 Four-Wheel Electr c ar o That the bid tabulation and arrters Sec fica ion No. A-15 , recommendation re award of Purchase to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company of Thirteen (13) Each Four-Wheel Electric Cargo Carriers, Specification No. A-152, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company for a total amount not to exceed $54,600.00 plus sales tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awa rtling Purchase of Five 5 Each Four-Wheel E ectriC Personnel That the bid tabulation and Carriers, Specification No. A-15 , recommendation re award of Purchase oTaylor-Dunn Manufacturing of Five (5) Each Four-Wheel Electric Company Personnel Carriers, Specification No. A-153, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company for a total amount not to exceed $18,000.00 plus sales tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase of OneIII ombination i Pressure Water and That the bid tabulation and Vacuum Sewer Cleaning Truck, recommendation re Purchase of One (1) pecf ication No. A-1 4, to Haaker Combination High Pressure Water and Equipment Company Vacuum Sewer Cleaning Truck, Specification No. A-154, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the bid of Sancon Engineering, Inc. be, and is hereby, rejected as not meeting the specifications; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Haaker Equipment Company for a total amount not to exceed $232,610.00 plus sales tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizin staff to issue a urchase order to General Ocean cs That staff be, and is hereby, Inc. for urchase of Une Rosette authorized to issue a purchase order multi-Bottle Water am ler to General Oceanics, Inc. in an S ecifica on No. E-2o amount not to exceed $25,027.00, plus freight and sales tax, for purchase of One Rosette Multi-Bottle Water Sampler (Specification No. E-200). ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 6 to the plans and sgecificat ons for That Change Order No. 6 to the plans Job No. J-177 and specifications for Central \./ Laboratory, Job No. J-17, authorizing an addition of $34,319.00 to the contract with J.R. Roberts Corporation for five items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. -6- 06/12/91 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 1 to the plans Job No. J-19-1 and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1 , authorizing an addition of $11,436.00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation for one item of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 11 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 11 to the plans Job No. P1-34-1 and specifications for Gas Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-1, authorizing an addition of $14,968.00 to the contract with Ziebarth 8 Alper for five items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re NPDES Ocean Monitoring Program required by EPA Receive, file and approve Staff Moved, seconded and duly carried: Report and Recommendation for NPDES Ocean Monitorin Pro ram Year Seven That the Staff Report and 1991-91 and Selection Committee Recommendation for NPDES Ocean Certification re Amendment No. 8 to Monitoring Program Year Seven Agreement with SAIL re (1991-92) and Selection Committee �a✓ Specification No. S-032 Certification of the negotiated fee for Amendment No. 8 to Agreement with Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall , Specification No. S-032, be, and are hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. Approving Amendment No. 8 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: A reement with SAIC re Specification No. S-03 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 91-80, approving Amendment No. 8 to the Agreement with SAIC for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-Inch Ocean Outfall , Specification No. S-032, extending the contract from July 1, 1991 to June 30, 1992, for an amount not to exceed $1,856,923.00 for Year Seven of said contract. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Professional Services Agreement with Bush 8 Associates, That the Selection Committee Inc. for Surveying Services for certification of the final negotiated Various Collection System and fee relative to the Professional Treatment Plant Projects, Services Agreement with Bush 8 - Specification No. 5-051 Associates, Inc. for Surveying Services for Various Collection System and Treatment Plant Projects, Specification No. S-051, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, -7- 06/12/91 FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 91-81, approving said agreement with Bush & Associates, Inc. for said services on an hourly-rate basis for labor including overhead, direct expenses and profit, plus supplies and materials, at cost, for a total • amount not to exceed $75,000.00 for a one-year period beginning June 12, 1991, with provision for up to two one-year extensions. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin Professional Services A reement w h ortl A. torKerm, That the Selection Committee ulvil Engineer for burveying certification of the final negotiated Services for Various Collection fee relative to the Professional System and Treatment Plant Services Agreement with Clifford Projects, 5pecification No. S- 51 A. Forkert, Civil Engineer, for Surveying Services for Various Collection System and Treatment Plant Projects, Specification No. S-051, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 91-82, approving said agreement with Clifford A. Forkert, Civil Engineer, for said services on an hourly-rate basis for labor including overhead, direct expenses and profit, plus supplies and materials, at cost, for a total amount not to exceed $75,000.00 for a one-year period beginning June 12, 1991, with provision for up to two one-year extensions. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rov n ra ess ono ery ces Agri with OGA onsultants I That the Selection Committee inc. for burve ingServices for certification of the final negotiated arious Collection System and fee relative to the Professional reatment Plant Protects. Services Agreement with DGA Spec f ca'E o— f-b�l Consultants, Inc. for Surveying Services for Various Collection System and Treatment Plant Projects, Specification No. S-051, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 91-83, approving said agreement with DGA Consultants, Inc. for said services on an hourly-rate basis for labor including overhead, direct expenses and profit, plus supplies and materials, at cost, for a total amount not to exceed $50,000.00 for a one-year period beginning June 12, 1991, with provision for up to two one-year extensions. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: pproving Professional ervices Agreement with ohn arollo That the Selection Committee Engineers for des gn, cons rust on certification of the final negotiated support services and preparation of fee relative to the Professional operation ano maintenance manuals Services Agreement with John Carollo Tor Job Nos. P1-38and P�3 Engineers for design, construction support services and preparation of operation and maintenance manuals for Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. I, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, -8- 06/12/91 FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 91-84, approving said agreement with John Carollo Engineers for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $1,914,805.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Fnc Receive fon ile and den claim of en Trug That the claim of Vincent Truong dated May 8, 1991, for property damages in an estimated amount of $1,300.00 and for medical costs in an - undetermined amount, allegedly caused by an automobile accident involving a District vehicle, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the Districts' General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the General Manager to employ a Source Control Manager at That the General Manager be, and is a salary above the mid-point of the hereby, authorized to employ a Source current range Control Manager at a salary above the mid-point of the salary range (currently $4,766 to $6,196 per month) for this position classification to head the Source Control Division in the Districts' Technical Services Department. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Aut orizin the eneral In er to Isi nate members of t e Boards That the General Manager be, and is antl or staff to attend and partici- hereby, authorized to designate pate in meetings, hearings, members of the Boards and/or staff to conferences, facit tyty ins attend and participate in various and other functions training programs, meetings, hearings, conferences, facility inspections and other functions which, in his opinion, will be of value to the Districts or affect the Districts' interests, including, but not limited to, those conducted by organizations providing specific training, state and federal legislative and regulatory bodies and the California Association of Sanitation Agencies, California Water Pollution Control Association, Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, and the Water Pollution Control Federation; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursementfor travel , meals, lodging and incidental expenses be, and is hereby, authorized in accordance with existing Districts' policies and the approved annual budget for 1991-92. -9- 06/12/91 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Annual nomination for Chairman of the Joint Administrative The General Counsel briefly reviewed Organization the provisions of the Districts' Rules of Procedure relating to nomination and election of the Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman. This being the annual meeting fixed by the Boards at which nominations are to be made for the office of Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization, the Secretary then declared the nominations open. Director William D. Mahoney was nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. It was pointed out that nominations would remain open until the regular July Board meeting. The Secretary then reported that the election would be held at said July meeting in accordance with the Boards' Rules of Procedures for the Conduct of Business of the Districts. Nominations and election of a Vice Joint Chairman will also be held at the regular July meeting. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: ece ve file and a rove staff ummary financial Report Tor nine- That the staff Summary Financial month period ending March 31, 1 91 Report for nine-month period ending March 31, 1991. be, and is hereby, `../ received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive file and approve written - re ort of e Exetive Committee That the written report of the joint and Fiscal thPo icycu ommittee meeting of the Executive Committee and the Fiscal Policy Committee held on May 22, 1991, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Re ort of the Execu ive Committee and Fiscal That the report and recommendations of Policy Committee re 1991-92 the Executive Committee and Fiscal personnel requirements and joint Policy Committee re 1991-92 personnel works budge ts requirements and joint works operating and construction budgets, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving 1991-92 personnel re ui rements antl ending That the 1991-92 personnel • las sification and Compensation requirements be, and are hereby, Resolution No. 79-20, as amentled approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 91-86, amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, re 1991-92 personnel requirements. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -10- O6/12/91 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried by A rovin the 1 - 2 Joint the following roll call vote: perating u%R AYES: Fred Barrera, Bob Bell , Walter K. Bowman, A. B. "Buck" Catlin, John Collins, John C. Cox, Jr., Norman E. Culver, Richard B. Edgar, James V. Evans, James H. Flora, Peter Green, Don R. Griffin, John M. Gullixson, Evelyn Hart, Jack Kelly, Frank Laszlo, William D. Mahoney, Robert H. Main, Pat McGuigan, Keith A. Nelson, Arthur G. Newton, Glenn Parker, Iry Pickler, Ruthelyn Plummer, Leslie A. Pontious, Charles E. Puckett, Robert Richardson, Don R. Roth, Phil Sansone, Sal A. Sapien, Mark Schwing, Sally Anne Sheridan, Roger R. Stanton, Peer A. Swan, Charles E. Sylvia, James A. Wahner, Grace H. Winchell NOES: None ABSENT: Burnie Dunlap, William D. Ehrle, Miguel Pulido That the proposed Joint Operating Budget Funds of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 for the 1991-92 fiscal year, be, and are hereby, approved and adapted as follows: Fund Total Amount Joint Operating/Working Capital $53,131,000 Workers' Compensation Self-Insured 257,000 Self-Funded Health Plan Trust 2,177,000 Public Liability Self-Insured 336,000 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried by Approving the 1991-92 Capitalthe following roll call vote: Outlay Revolving Fund Budget AYES: Fred Barrera, Bob Bell , Walter K. Bowman, A. B. "Buck" Catlin, John Collins, John C. Cox, Jr., Norman E. Culver, Richard B. Edgar, James V. Evans, James H. Flora, Peter Green, Don R. Griffin, John M. Gullixson, Evelyn Hart, Jack Kelly, Frank Laszlo, William D. Mahoney, Robert H. Main, Pat McGuigan, Keith A. Nelson, Arthur G. Newton, Glenn Parker, Iry Pickler, Ruthelyn Plummer, Leslie A. Pontious, Charles E. Puckett, Robert Richardson, Don R. Roth, Phil Sansone, Sal A. Sapien, Mark Schwing, Sally Anne Sheridan, Roger R. Stanton, Peer A. Swan, Charles E. Sylvia, James A. Wahner, Grace H. Winchell NOES: None ABSENT: Burnie Dunlap, William D. Ehrle, Miguel Pulido _ That the proposed 1991-92 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget (CORF Joint Works Construction) of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, Si6, 7, `..✓ 11, 13 and 14, be, and is hereby, approved and adopted in the total amount of $114,120,000.00. -I1- 06/12/91 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Fiscal Policy Committee to evaluate proposals That the Fiscal Policy Committee be, and to place Excess Workers' and is hereby, authorized and directed Com ensation insurance coverage to evaluate proposals obtained by the effective July 1. M11 Districts' insurance broker and to place Excess Workers' Compensation insurance coverage effective July 1, 1991; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said action shall be submitted to the Joint Boards for ratification or revision at the regular meeting on July 17, 1991. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin in r nci le, the Min computer Hardware System and That the Minicomputer Hardware System Network Master Plan and Network Master Plan, be, and is hereby, approved, in principle. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to v1gi al Equi Amen That staff be, and is hereby, corporation authorized to issue a purchase order to Digital Equipment Corporation, in an amount not to exceed $567,000 plus tax relative to implementation of the first phase of the Minicomputer Hardware System and Network Master Plan, for purchase of a VAX 4000, Model 300, dual-host cluster computer system with fiber optic Ethernet Network. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizin staff to issue a purc ase order.to Fisons That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to VG Fisons, in an amount not to exceed $249,600 plus tax, for purchase of Laboratory Information Management System software to manage the large volumes of data handled by the laboratory and help comply with applicable regulatory requirements. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin Memorandum of Unders an in a ween bAWFA and the That the Memorandum of Understanding Is r c s uoverning Qualityon ro between Santa Ana Watershed Project of Wastewaters DISChar ed or to the Authority (SAWPA) and the Districts Santa Ana Regional Intercep re Governing Quality Control of EPA's pretreatment requirements Wastewaters Discharged to the Santa Ana Regional Interceptor with regard to EPA's pretreatment requirements for applicable dischargers within the SAWPA jurisdiction, be, and is hereby, approved. • ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: eceive, file an approve written re ort of the Conservation Rec cle That the written report of the and Reuse uommittee Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee's meeting on May 30, 1991, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. -12- 06/12/91 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve Staff Re ort re ac ui sition of Rancho del That the Staff Report dated May 23, Rio property an declar ng a site 1991 relative to acquisition of not to be a viable wastewater Rancho del Rio property from the residuals management option County of Orange for use as a wastewater residuals composting site, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors do hereby declare that the site is not a viable wastewater residuals management option, and that the staff be directed not to pursue acquisition of the site. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amending Board authorization of April B, IN re feasibility That the Board action of April B, studies IN to joint water 1987 re feasibility Studies reclamation projects with OCWO to pertaining to joint water reclamation include . oint water recycl ng projects with the Orange County Water projects with ULWD an other District (OCWD), be, and is hereby, agencies amended to authorize participation with OCWD and other appropriate public and private water and wastewater agencies relative to the feaslbility of joint water recycling projects, and increasing the total authorized amount from $100,000 to $250,000 for the Sanitation Districts- share of said studies. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizf ng Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 55395 to That Change Order No.-1 to Purchase MacDonald-Stevens Engineers Inc. Order No. 50395 to MacDonald-Stevens re Crescent Basin Feasibility Study Engineers, Inc. increasing the maximum authorized amount from $25,000.OD to $28,000.00 for engineering services pertaining to the Crescent Basin Feasibility Study, be, and is hereby, authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Director of Finance o certify claims and forward to That the Director of Finance be, and Count Auditor for payment is hereby, authorized to certify claims and forward to the Orange County auditor for immediate payment for expenditures incurred after June 30, 1991, and that he declare that such certification shall comply with the provisions of Resolution No. 76-ID pertaining to procedures for payment of claims against the Districts until the 1991-92 budgets are adopted by the respective Districts. _ ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: OnN in [lased Session pursuant to Government Cotle Sections 54956.9 The Boards convened in closed session and 54957.6 at 7:53 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9 and 54957.6. ALL DISTRICTS At 8:04 p.m. the Boards reconvened in econvene in regular sess pn regular session. ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel reported that the Actions re claims an ding Boards of Directors, in the course of iti at on en t etl overnment the closed session held pursuant to at al. v. Montrose Lnemicai Government Code Section 54956.9, Corporation, at al. reviewed the claims and pending litigation entitled U.S. Government et al. v. Montrose Chemical Cor oration et al. He further repg�ed than _ the Boards authorized t e tlefense and ndemn fication of the LOS Alamitos County Water District and the Yorba Linda Water District in connection with 1 , said litigation, subject to the same terms and conditions as all other �•r� member agencies. -13- O6/12/91 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving MO Us with Eng near ng antl Confidential Employee Units That Memoranda of Understanding with the Engineering Employee Unit and the Confidential Employee Unit, for a three-year period, be, and are hereby, approved for the period November 30, 1990 through November 25, 1993, in accordance with the action taken by the Boards in closed session on June 12, 1991. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 7 - 0 That the Boards of Directors hereby as amendetl antl Terms an adopt Resolution No. 91-91, amending Conditions of Em o en Reso Otion Classification and Compensation No.-. as amendetl, re changes Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, and In salaries and benefits for Terms and Conditions of Employment Engineering and Confidential Resolution No. 79-21, as amended, Employee units incorporating changes in salaries and benefits for Districts' Engineering Employee Unit and the Confidential Employee Unit, effective as provided in the Memoranda of Understanding with said units. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT I Moved, seconded and duly carried: A journment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , July 17, 1991. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:05 p.m., June 12, 1991. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: 811,211,1 n han a rder No. t o e tas n s eci ficaions for That Change Order No. 1 to the plans Contract Nos. 2- - and -2 and specifications for Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue (including City of Anaheim Street Improvements), Contract No. 2-26-3; Katella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street (Ninth Street), Contract No. 2-28; and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29, authorizing an addition of $143,363.00 to the contract with Steve Bubalo Construction Co. for five items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: AdJournmen That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , July 17, 1991. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:05 p.m., June 12, 1991. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving reement with the Westminster meaevelopment Agency re That the Board of Directors hereby Amendment No.4 to Westminster er adopts Resolution No. 91-87-3, Comnercia Redevelopment Project approving Agreement with the No. F Westminster Redevelopment Agency, electing a tax increment pass-through relative to Amendment No. 4 to Westminster Commercial Redevelopment Project No. 1, in accordance with District policy and pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33676. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -14- 06/12/91 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: warding Purchase of Two Each - -- ant 1e 7e uenc Drive Units That the bid tabulation and ecification No. h-199, to recommendation re award of Purchase Emerson industrial rontros of Two (2) Each Variable Frequency Drive Units, Specification No. E-199, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Emerson Industrial Controls, for a total amount not to exceed $47,188.00 plus sales tax. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., July 17, 1991. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:05 p.m., June 12, 1991. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: ut or zjn the a ect on omm ee to ne o is a ddendum No. 2 to the That the Selection Committee be, and Professional Services reement is hereby, authorized to negotiate with he Keith Companies for design Addendum No. 2 to the Professional and construction services required Services Agreement with The Keith for Contract Nos. - 5 an 5-36 Companies for design and construction services required for the South Coast Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-35, and the Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract , No. 5-36, to provide for additional design services for a landscaping plan for Crystal Cove Pump Station, as required by the California Department of Fish and Game. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin a reement wi t o t of New ort Beach for a coo era ve That the Board of Directors hereby project to construct raised medians adopts Resolution No. 91-88-5, along ac fjc Coastwa t gq F approving agreement with the City of orona del Mar in con unction with Newport Beach, relative to a Contract No. b-34-3 cooperative project to construct raised medians along Pacific Coast Highway through Corona del Mar for the City in conjunction with Districts' Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-34-3, and providing for equal sharing of the cost of said medians. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: djournmen That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., July 17, 1991. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:05 p.m., June 12, 1991. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., July 17, 1991. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:05 p.m., June 12, 1991. -15- 06/12/91 DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , July 17, 1991. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:05 p.m. , June 12, 1991. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. t to the Tans and specifications for That Change Order No. 1 to the plans contract NO. and specifications for Campus Relief Sewer, between Von Karmen Avenue and Jamboree Boulevard, Contract No. 7-13, authorizing an addition of $54,355.63 to the contract with Albert W. Davies, Inc., for one item of additional work, payment of bonuses for early completion in accordance with the provisions of the specifications, and granting a time extension of ten calendar days for inclement weather, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: rov n Cane Order No. o e ons an specifications for That Change Order No. 2 to the plans contract No. 7-1J and specifications for Campus Relief Sewer, between Von Kaman Avenue and Jamboree Boulevard, Contract No. 7-13, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total deduction of $696.10 from the contract with Albert W. Davies, Inc., be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accectinq Contracto. -1 as complete That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 91-89-7, accepting Campus Relief Sewer, between Von Karman Avenue and Jamboree Boulevard, Contract No. 7-13, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovtn A reement wi a Oran e oun o0 on ro s r ct or That the Board of Directors hereby re ocat on Of s r c o. sewer adopts Resolution No. 91-90-7, siphon in conjunction with O approving Agreement with the Orange improvements to the E1 Modena- County Flood Control District, Irvine Channel providing for reimbursement of costs to the Flood Control District for the relocation of District's 8-inch VCP sewer siphon, in conjunction with OCFCD improvements to the El Modena-Irvine Channel between Browning Avenue and Red Hill Avenue within the City of Tustin, and authorizing payment of a $40,000.00 deposit for Districts' portion of said work. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 7 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the tans and specifications for That Change Order No. 1 to the plans contract NO. 14-1-Z and specifications for Baker Force Mains, from Main Street Pump Station to Bristol Street, Contract No. 14-1-2, authorizing an addition of $7,600.00 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Co. , Inc., for additional costs incurred to submit a separate performance bond required by John Wayne Airport Authority, be, and is hereby, approved. -16- 06/12/91 DISTRICTS 6, 7 & 14 Authorizing General Counsel to engage Palmieri , Tyler, Wiener, Wilhelm & Waldron as Special Counsel for right-of-way required for Contract No. 14-1-1A Verbal report of General Counsel The Districts' General Counsel ' reviewed previous actions taken by the Boards to acquire right-of-way needed for construction of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Contract No. 14-1-1A, by eminent domain proceedings. He also advised that there has been little progress made in negotiations with the Mesa Verde Country Club over the past several months to obtain right-of-way required through a portion of their property, and it appeared litigation was imminent. Mr. Woodruff also noted that the Mesa Verde Country Club had filed a legal challenge to the CEQA proceedings completed by the Districts relative to this project. He advised that the matter was scheduled for hearing the following day. The General Counsel recommended that the Districts retain special legal counsel to proceed with eminent domain proceedings in connection with the Mesa Verde Country Club right-of-way and to assist in acquiring other easements, as required, for construction of Contract No. 14-1-1A. He added that the Mesa Verde Country Club matter may require a jury trial for final adjudication which would also be handled by the special legal counsel . Mr. Woodruff recommended that the firm of Palmieri , Tyler, Wiener, �.../ Wilhelm 8 Waldron be engaged as said special legal counsel inasmuch as they specialize in eminent domain proceedings. He noted that the firm is one of the most capable in the County for handling matters on behalf of public agencies. They are presently retained by the Districts in connection with acquisition of oil interests at Treatment Plant No. 2. Receive and file General Counsel 's Moved, seconded and duly carried: Memorandum That the General Counsel 's Memorandum dated May 29, 1991, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Authorizing the General Counsel to Moved, seconded and duly carried: engage the law firm of Palmieri , Tyler, Wiener, Wilhelm & Waldron as That the General Counsel be, and Special Counsel is hereby, authorized to engage the law firm of Palmieri , Tyler, Wiener, Wilhelm & Waldron as Special Counsel for acquisition of necessary right-of-way for the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Contract No. 14-1-1A. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of - Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , July 17, 1991. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 6:07 p.m. , June 12, 1991. -17- 06/12/91 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , July 17, 1991. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:07 p.m. , June 12, 1991. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , July 17, 1991. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:07 p.m., June 12, 1991. becretary of t e Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 119 13 and 14 -18- NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/1?/91 P4GE I' RE-Oat NURSER 4003 ' COUNTY SAN CLAIMS PAID 05/08/91 POSTING DATE 95/9B/91 WARRANT NO, VENDOR 1 NT 114052 A S A DEBURRIMG S TUMBLING 1475.96 REFUND USSR PEE OVERPAYMENT 114053 CA Ai R AIJA NESs CAMPAIGN 1335_oa NATER_CONSERVATION MATERIALS____._ 114050 RAG SYSTEMS S19D.65 INSTRUMENT PARTS - 114059 AT S 1 $1.525.59 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES LA@ BUPPLIB$ 114057 AIR PRODUCTS 0 CHEMICAL IN 516.174.00 OAR AGREENBNT-OBY. GEN. BY". H.O.0--9-09 114058 AIRBORNE SYSTEMS. INC. 15,ODO.00 AERIAL MAP - RANCHO DEL RIO COMMIT" SITE 114059 AIRWAY S2DI.I0 TRUCK SCALE REPAIR _ 314060 AL NIE10 COMPANY 156.73 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 114061 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT $24.74 ASPHALT 114062 ALPHAGA) A•R216a60 _INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 114063 AMERICAN CABLING 1 COHN SIST.43 COMMUNIGTIOM SUPPLIER 214064 AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY $299.00 SUBSCRIPTION 114015 40 AMERICAN 14 PUMP PARTS 114066 /KETEMA S396.99 MECHANICAL PARTS 114067 CITY OF ANAHEIM $8.039.74 CONSTRUCTION 2-26 11481A ANAHEIM EXTRUSION CO INC f53 72 REFUND_USER_FEE_OVERPAYMENT 114069 ANAHEIM MOTEL $30.68 REFUND USER FEB OVERPAYMENT 114070 ANAHEIM SAW SHOP INC $145.75 TOOL REPAIR TWIT ANCIENT MARINER RFNtAHNAVY 110.00 REFUND USER FEB OVERPAYMENT ITT I 114073 AND TER - DISTRIBUTION S515.06 —CABLE FEE OV ------ X 114073 AND D.RRT 1515.86 REFUND USER P86 OVERPAYMENT .Z-. u10)1 •-PLUe CYST EMS f9.o42.ST NOTICES 6 ADS 114075 AQUATIC SIOSYSTEMS, 14C SI40.15 LAB SUPPLI68 114076 ABATER SERVICES INC 93.330.20 UNIFORM RENTALS y 114077 ASSOC, ADMINI3. 6 U A MEDICAL CLAIMS ADMINI_STRATOR__ 11401E AVONGARD PRODUCTS USA9 LTD $151.08 MONITORINGBp02PMENT n 114079 FALCON OISP OSAL SEPYICE 1159.066.92 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.7-13-00 P... N BACRPLOM TESTING 114081 BAKER PLYWOOD CO INC $1.392.02 BUILDING SUPPLIES 124082 BANCROFT-WHITNEY CO 9453.01 PUBLICATION 114003 PV BAROTTI AND ASSOC 15,200.00 CONSTRUCTION S_E_R_VIC_E_S_Pl-_34_-_263,J-21 114084 BAKTER DIAGNOSTICS INC 91.213.60 LANPLIES I HOBS BEACH-LIN PLAZA 8431:13 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYNEIR 4086 A TRAVEL 6 MEETING SBPENBE 114087 816 CANTON COUNTRY CLUB S1.055.10 RIF-UR-D ITER-YER-MRRPATMW----- 1140PB BLUE DIAMOND MATERIALS $399.82 CONCRETE 111089 THE BONG BUYER 536.38 TECHNICAL PUBLICAT_I_ON 11409D BOOT BARN $99.99 -5FFETT-9H0S3 I11091 BPOO NNURST SHOPPING CENTER 1316.93 REFUND USER FEB OVERPAYMENT 4 92 S N M 1 .59 INSTRUMENT PART _ 114093 BROWN 9 CALDWELL $3.999.10 LAB 714094 STEVE BUBAL0 CONSTRUCTION CO 13.787.421.06 CONSTRUCTION 2-26-3,2-20,2-29 114095 BUILDER. ENPORIUR - SIV9.91 MARDWARE/LU118ER i 114096 BU/LOINS NEWS 'INC SS/0.99 Toud"1ow - _ 114097 BURKE ENGINEERING CO $30.29 REGULATOR PARTS FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORK196 CAPITAL P43CESSING DATE 5/02192 FASE 2 REFORT NUMBE4 AMOS COUNTY OICT4TC" OF DRAYSP [DUNIY CLAIMS PAID 05/08/91 POSTING DATE 05/08/91 WARRANT NO, YFNDDRA 309IPIIDR II4099 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES INC f2.509.00 SURVEY SERVICES RES 08-71 y. PBT2Y CASH REIMBURSENBNT.________ 114100 BUTLER PAPER COMPANY 547.85 OF1'ICB 80PPLIE9 114102 CEN CORPORATION $3.443.19 LAB SUPPLIES " 96RVICB AGRBSMENT 119103 - CS GLASSCOMPANY f6$421.05 PLULAB SING SUPPLI88 1 H]O4 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. . .05 MEC 9UPPLIEB MCRAN9ICAL,NI PARTS 11410E CJOHNALL fl CALAPRICE POD f$2.307.43 OCEAN MONITORING M.O. 1-90 IIIIOT CILLAYAT CHEMICAL CO f2.l41.13 ANIONIC POLYMER M.0.8-0-90 R MNCMANICAL PARTS 1141 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS f2 .5 . RSEBRING_86RV ICR9 114110 CHEVRON USA INC $3r410.50 GREAEL 6 OIL TEFUND USER FEE R TRAINING B8_P8N86 _ 124213 CINCO t139.30 REFUND USER F88 OVERPAYMENT 1/1113 - COAST FIR[ ExDIPAEN fS6d0 FIRE EQUIPMENT SERVICE 1141 COAST TxCuAGENCY RARTN U INSURANCE M.O. 3-13-91 114115 COASTAL COMMUNITIES f999.85 REFUND USER USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 14116 7 COMMERCIAL ON CENTER COMPONENTS f2A05.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 2 e PUMP PARTS ITC 114110 CONNELL GM PARTS / DIY $79.55 TRUCK PARTS X 114119 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL GIST 93.589.47 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 2 PUOLICIITION9 l37 11*122 COOPEOLCO i1$350.12 RIA—FITTIid NGS FARTS � 1141P2 COOPER INDUSTRIES INC 335/.12 FITTINGS B ELECTRIC RENTAL D 111121 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC f4B1.00 RESIDUALS SUPPLIES 1 311128 LARNT DU RTI TR UCN 6 [OUMMM $23.942.99 RESIDUALS REMOVAL X.O.7-I3-90 N q.RD PUBLICATION CONSULTING 114128 ALBER S MOO RE $150,316.59 CONSULTING SR RV. - BARTNQ�AR6-FREPARHiiQE 114128 ALBE RT Y OAV ICE INC f292 d51.04 CONSTRUCTION I-13 BUILDING REPAIRS 11413 DEL MAR WINDOW COYERIN6S f1. 9 .0 REFUND US ER FEE OVERPAYMENT 114131 OELEC $15.90 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 2 1s2 VALVE PARTS 11413 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES f171.90 PRIUTING . __. i 114134 OI3C0 PRINT COMPANY - .121.9E OFFICE SUPPLIES 5 i 11 TOOL REPAIR __ 11413E DOCTORS ENTERPRISES OF SANTA AMI 99.495.00 PLAJMD VEER FEE oVERPAYMIRT 114138 OORA00 ENTF RPRIS ES INC f9.495.00 PLANT RENTAL 0 REPAIR 11413E DUNKEL WARD MACH MQy IM6 f3.141.01 SPACE RENTAL J-19A 110119 OU NN [DYARD$ CORP tl•615.1T PAXW-9UPPLI89-- --- - - - _- -— _ 114140 D'YALS SALES 2212.40 FITTINGS 111I11 [R[ EN M LAB SERVICES 114142 EASTMAN INC $1.623.62 OFFICE ZPPLI-B� 114143 ENCHANTER INC $7.300.00 CK3UM HORITORINS M.O.3-14-90 NO 9199 JI DIST WORRIED CAPITAL ` PiOCESSIN6 DATE 5102191 PAGC 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 - tll• CLAIRE ►4I0 05/09/9l P33TING DATE DS/88/91 Wu qxt MR. v n.. 114111 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC 11,241.80 LAB SERVICES ERRAT r.WTnN ils REFUND USER PEE OVERPATUNT 114146 JOHN 9 FALKENSTEIN PE $3.218.18 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-1 --" 1/1147 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 6123.00 AIR FREIGHT PROPANE _ 114149 FILTER SUPPLY CO $233.73 MECHANICAL PARTS 114158 FISCHER L PORTER CO $14.043.01 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 114152 FLO-SYSTEMS {1A23.60 PUMP PARTS 114153 FLUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $29.36 PUMP PARTS HARDWARE 114155 FOXBORO CO / HAS SYSTEMS 51.339.19 INSTRUMENT PARTS 114156 FRANKLIN COMPUTER CORP. ST50.11 PUBLICATION 31{_va PAINT SUPPLIER 114158 GMT SOUND INC 9342.20 SAFETY SUPPLIER 114159 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO 12.235.02 TELEPHONE SERVICES REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 11161 GIERLICN-M ITCNELL INC 927 . RUMP PART 114161 61ENHAV[N MOB ILOD 6[ 91 t114,242A REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT •1416+ _ G. RDON . .vry l.a_9 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT__ ITI 1111E GRAND INCTER S2.130.95 2 OFFICE SUPPLIES . _ = 111165 BRAND CENTER {14.92 REFUND USER F68 IESRPAYMBWI' •1As67 GRAPHIC RAPHIr DISTRIBUTORS x< .009�80 POLAIN ROID BUPPLIEB ISO 11A160 6RAP NGR DISTRIBUTORS {5.006.50 SURVEY SERVICES US N 11116E DON GREEN 6 1SSOCIATES f17r191.50 SURVEY USER FEE RE8 06-72 1 REFUND USER FEE OV6RPAYN6M7' n 114170 HALTOM RECOGNITION INC {I13.62 RECOGNITION AWARDS 111171 HATCH 8 KIRK INC {8.193.06 ENGINE PARTS W ......... TRASH REMOVAL ___ 114173 S A MEALY CO 56.561.57 FEWER REPAIRS_DIET I " 114174 HODGSON ELECTRIC 91,490.80 RADIO TONER INSTALLATION .ulfa xoo rql sly t_1• TRUCK PARTS 114276 J.T. HORVATH A ASSOC. $2.000.00 CONSTRUCTION sUvlcm.T-2J-z,.U-T-O•—-" 111177 HOUSE OF BATTERIES {670.51 BATTERIES 61A17q a xn6xee re 1Ne sl.•Av_vr SAFETY SUPPLIES 111179 BOON ET HUNT CO $4.913.73 EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT 1111870 MUNIIN6TOE BE ACM RUBBER STA 1$0.27 OFFICE SUPPLIES ...... HUNTTue1Rx Gunn r 131.12 HARDWARE 114102 IBM CORP f100.i1 REFUND UBBR FEE-0 OVERPAYMENT 1I1103 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL S33 dSS.f1 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O. 11-16-90 114224 IN6q.M n6nrR 41 ST q..e JANITORIAL SUPPLIER 114105 INSIDE WASTE C/O CAP RE►OR $275.00 PUBLICATION 114106 INT4 UNION OF OPERATING E t2.500.00 SETTLEMENT, CARE 56665E I1A157 te..x0 ogEie S{y•e PUBLICATIIXI 114140 J 6 W SCIENTIFIC S49.82 LAB SUPPLIES 114189 JAL MANUFACTURING 82 $96.41 REFUND USSR PER 0VBRPAVMBIOP FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL Pl OCESSING GATE 9/02/91 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBEi APU ^ Nl1 'MIAILON_DUSTDIrl"F DAANGC-101MIl CLAIMS PAID D5/D9/91 POStIVG DATE 35/18191 ueeeeut YI1. xEpO Do •rn uT - ---.UES CRI PTION__ ___ . . _.. . __ 114190 YILLIA4 H JACKSON $5.90 MEETING EXPENSE ESSEA N-_SANLJiAV SUPP .6}0.i0 3AR3JQRIAL.SUPPLIES_____ 111192 JAT.S CATERING 6371.42 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSE 114193 JT LEE INVESTMENT $163.51 REFUND USE FEE OVERPAYMENT 41419A rJDIU TONE--- WPLS -294 D0 Z6$O•TRIC PARTS 114195 THE KEITH COMPANIES $973.32 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-35 8 5-36 114196 MELLY SPRINGFIELD TIRE COMP $290.42 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 11A1°T NENNEDV--COURT REJIORTre tL15.00 --SSIIYRT REPORTER_SERV._- NBUTRON_PLITIMG 114198 KENSINGTON GARDENS MOBILENOME $2.234.81 REFUND VEER FEE OVERPAYMENT 114199 KERR CLASS 116.937.1/ REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 114202 KING SEARING LLM INC f1.192.55 MACHINOFFICER SUPPLIES 119202 NDML1$ HALLMARK CENTER f1.332.19 OFFICE SUPPLI89 114204 KRAFTx FOOD LCNS° _ 15092.50 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES Ifi-1-2.I_9___ 114205 MRAFT FDOD $1.T92.58 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT 111P05 LA LAKPARA MOBIIMOME PARK ft.9D].17 REFUND USER ME OVERPAYMENT 11Ja0' LAB MOIrr rurrrTC A1�P°OOUCIS •919.13 —_ TEMPORARY SERVICES _._._..___._._ 114208 LAB SUPPORT t2.$50.30 TEMPORARY 86RVICOB 11120E LAN-PLATE TEEN f60.30 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 114210 LIDO nw MARINA LAve 1_q5 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT X 114211 LIDO MARINA VILLAGE fl•111.1E REFUND ETIN USER TFEE RAINING EXPENSE Z ...... YILLIAM J LL,G. ft0.10 MEETING 6 TWINING EXPENSE Ed 114213 COUNTY OF L rnee ee3.25.--- .—_roMPUTSR SOFTWARAGREEMENT Ul 114214 COUNTY OF HOTEL AN 6[L ES f1$230.06 REFUND U AGREEMENT 114111 LUCKY 1 MOTEL 5250.0E REFUND USER FEB OVERPAYMENT -1 151 16 PHOTOGRAPHIC AGREEMENT 1 114217 NACOECD $225.20 TRRVICEANSFORMER MER¢REPAI � 1I121T KA6NE TECI INC f2i3.00 TRANBFORMBR REPAIR G 114219 MARTEN a$19.6 ELECTRICS SUPPLIES 114220 MARVAC ELECTRONICS f19.69 PUMP CTSUPPLIBS ...... MATT - CNL OR INC 11/6.i6 PUMP PARTS INSTRUMENT PARTS_ 114222 MESA TECHNOLOGY $93.50 REFUND USER WHOMOVERPAYNEW 114223 CROMPTON MCTERMASTER INC $212.35 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES n APPA M1[E tw[ aI.SyOe _ REFUND USER F88 OVERPAYMENT_ __ 114225 MICROASE COMPUTER 12,249.32 COMPUTER SOFTWARE/HARDWARE- ' 114226 MICROASE COMPUTER STORES 91,315.36 COMPUTER SOFTWARE/HARDWARE 114,27 MT111PORE AND/OR—YAIERR 129A 19P LAB SUPPLIES 114228 SERPENTIX AND/ '$3.470.2, MECHARICAL PARTS-- - - --- - -- 114229 MISSION LINEN SUPPLY 24.502.78 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT t1 A230 BLAME IU¢3EJ1_LO_gSIAUCIID° S,L.1 as A33e Tn CONSTRUCTION 16-1-2 111231 MOX TGDM ERS LABORATORIES $1.639.74 LAB 88RVICks PL 1 111232 NONTROT SUPPLY CO 5112 0. 4 OFFICE SUPPLIES 114234 NABISC a rnlnuR yRW VEe i2663A CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES __ __ 114235 NATIONA t92.751.80 RECUND TRUCK FEB OVERPAYMENT' 111235 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES INC t2•]SI.BB VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES R .. NO 9199 JT GIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5102191 PAGE 5 RE-ORT NU09ER 4P15 _E ANIT All ON DISTRICTS Of ORANGE COUNTY CLIIMS PAID 04109/91 POSTING DATE 091O6191 WARRANT NO, [NQOR AMOWST _ DESCAILEION 11/236 NATIONAL VISUAL SYSTEMS 91039.30 SIGNS 114237 CITY OF EXPORT BEACH 11.0o WATER USE II4230 O-BRIEN ENERGY SYSTEMS 351 r502 7G INTERIM POWER GENER SYST M.O 3=B=E9_ 114239 DM SYSTEMS CO 129r56/..71 CHLORINE M.0.2-19-90 COAST114249 ORANGE 6B.3R ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 11/241 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY C $632.92 —CROUNOSKEEPING SUPPLIES - - - — - 16/2/9 ORANGE VALVE f FITTING CO. $623.35 FITTINGS a XYGEN SERVICE 5?12.53 SPECIALTY GASES ll AY/1 COUNTY OF ORANGE $2.609.00 15ATR PROCESSINC-SERVICES ---- -- 1/42/5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $5.///.8/ REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE G INC. 1115,.90 COMPUTER SOFTWARE __ _. 11/247 PSSI 9250.15 —CHEMICALS - ' _ -"'- IIA210 PACIFIC PUBLISHERS 955.99 PUBLICATION 114249 PACIFIC SAFETY1i.7B SAFETY SUPPLIES 11/230 PACIFIC BELL f6B/.// _-'TELEPHONE"SERVICES "'- 111251 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING C $60.40 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CELLULAR 92.3..E1—_ _ — __ CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 11/253 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS 92055.39 'TELEPHONE' OVSTEM HODIFICATIDNS" 114251 PAK WEST $1.317.41 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES X 850.00 LEGAL SERVICES - OIL WELL CONDENSATION SAFSTV SUPPLIES_. __..... ._.....__.._._.._ . 11125E P AMBDW 1182.6/ AUDITING SERVICES = 11/257 PEAT MAR WICK MAIINCN t CO 1670.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT -Allto 111259 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS INC 9125033.5P RE9IDUAL3 RENOVAG M.0.5=11=EB-""--"' ,--� 11/260 POLYPURE INC 216.052.70 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-07 '{ 114261 PORTRAIT WORLD INCREFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT D 11/262 POSTMASTER ill 1 --R..... USER-FEE-OVERPAYMENT'-""" 1 11/16, POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO $10.55 ELECTRIC PART In 11126/ WARDED PRINRO EE TOE 27XD0 ICE 91/265 PRINCESS MOTEL $125.99 REFUND"USSR F68 DOeRPATMEHT" 21/266 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. 14r916.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O. 0-0-00 II4267 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS 1399.51 ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR I14260 RATNIN INSTRUMENT CO., INC i1.321.30 SUPPLIES 11/269 RECYC INC 141.611.19 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.O.7-11-90 II1270 REMEDY TEMP 11_C373.23 TBMPOMRY SERVICES —PUBTALR'_..__ 11/272 REMOTE METER RESETTING STET 11.006.42 PLUMBING SUPPLIES L14273 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO 11.916.42 t U213 R[NO Lo IWCA 111 r1� MECHANICAL PARTS 11927E ROBINWOOD HOTEL $276.06 RSFUNQ USER FEE TRAINITMENT 11/275 ROSCMOUNT ANALYTICAL 1600.00 OXYGEN ANALYZER TWINING 214276 S t C OIL CORP A$ 7.01 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT I14277 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP $66./9 ---PARTS_CLEANER -" 11927E 34NTA ANA ELECTPIC MOTORS $136.00 ELECTRIC MOTOR PART CONSTRUCTION RETENTION PMNT 14-1-2 111200 SCIENTIFIC SPRAT FINISHERS $165.94 __ ..._REFURUVSER FEE UVERPAIHENT --'_-"-- I1/201 SEA COAST DESIGNS 9369.56 OFFICE MACHINE FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST SOARING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5102191 PAGE 6 1Eq ORT MONICA 4115 COUNTY SANITATION ]ISTRT[IS OF DRINK' COUNTY 'LATHS I410 05/03/91 POSTING DATE 05/06/91 WARRANT no, yrumnR - n0uxr nESCRiPIION_ I14282 SEAL BLACK $132.51 ASPHALT ypy 2e SECURITY SYSTEM PARTS 111284 7/12 MOTEL 6 RV PARK $423.65 EEFUND-U529 PRE HVERPAPRERT ------ 111285 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $708.24 SAFETY SUPPLIES R KAI Ft 2pp.p PREERNTATIOX 11A287 SLIDE MASTER 9165.17 - --- - R RIGS -- 114280 SMITH-EMERY CO 93,418.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.6-10-89 COMPUTER NARDMARS/SOFTMARS 114290 SONNENSCHEIN MAIN 6 ROSENTH i3.599.25 LEGAL SERVICES - PERSONNEL 114291 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY SS21.if PERMIT FEES ff ugP snnru I...T NA TrR Slit.,. REFUND USCR F88 OVERPAYMENT_ _ I14293 SO CALIF COASTAL WATER 27.209.00 OCEAN MONITORING- . 114294 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO $155.612.77 "HER gg2.qP DIESEL FUEL 114296 SDUVEMIN PHOTO 232.64 FILM PROCESSING 111297 STAMEN 2 SPASSOFF ►E $2.510.10 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-70-1.J-25 .0 MELDING SUPPLIES 114299 SPECTRUM-NUMAN RESOURCE SYS $31.640.44 COMPUTER SOFTWARE A.O:11-IZ--90 114300 AT EDNA CONVALESCEVT CENTER i2S8.06 REFUND USSR PRE OVERPAYMENT UxnRr tg e_aa REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT fTl 314302 STAR TOOL f SV►/lY CO $298.14 TOOLB--_-_- _.._._—_. . x 11N05 STERLING ART NL 76 ART SUPPLZEB 2 TRAVEL, MEETING 6 TRAINING EXPENSE a —_._ _.. _ _ 114306 SUMMIT STEEL ,762.75 STEEL 11130E SUNTI [HEM CORP f7S2-a, PAINT SUPPLIES fI4316 SYNERGY CIRCUITS ITP TOOI TM[ tP.Vf_Ra TOOLS 111309 SYNCRMY CIRCUITS INC 351.55 —REFUND USSR Fil PRE OVERPAYMENT C 111309 TAGLjRI WISDOM .. MOB....MF PA f711.SS REFUND ARTS PEG OVBRPAYMBNT CTI 124311 Tuine_-E ANALYTICAL [e Hs txr 343.ta TRUER PARTS 114312 TELEDYNE STEMSiIL f313.1p INSTRUMENT PARTS ...... TMERMCO SYSTEMS INCN tt.216.60 MEAN USER FEE OVERPAYMENT II4]u THOMPSON I _ _ - _,271.➢q_ OCEAN MONITORING__ 114315 GEORIE M. INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY t19100.00 REGISTRATION S 111315 GEOR GC R• ICAL f100•DO LAS SUPPLIES ff Mfa .Tfa TROPICAL FIRM LAB SUPPLIES L439.SZ ._-_— —.._- IN317 TONAL TADVERTISERS N.7$9.30 MEEITYI�- 11131f JANE TRAM yq.Sp MEETING EXPENSE g vfe TRsyn nne[ TIFFANY INx sAgLeO REFUND USER FEE OVORM7NEIR 114320 TRAVEL TRAVEL $3.505.50 -CRAVAT C2SGI:3.b=37-9V ' 114321 IS TRIPP SS15.00 CARPET CLEARING ff 1tP1 TA n[N a ...In SUPPLY INr TRUER PARTS 111323 J6 TUCKER 6 SON INC 910.799.18 IPeTTRURBRT PAR79- - - 111321 TVINING LABORATORIES OF $4.657.50 SOIL TESTING .1.1.4 OK POSTAL erOy lfF 291.S3 RSPUNU USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 114326 UNION FOODS $2,191.57 NE-6-U9GASOLI-bVBRPAYRBRT--—— 111327 UNOCAL y132.g6 UNLEADED GASOLINE I I �.. .J NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL IROCESSING DATE S/Ol/91 PAGE I REPORT NUNBEI AP43 CLAIMS PAID 15/06/91 POSTING GATE 09IOB/91 yp�_ urunns •u nYui _OESCALPTION .__._...__. 214328 UNION OIL CO/OBA UNOCAL $923.22 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT rn SAFETY SUPPLIES___ 11A331 UNITED ENTERPRISES SERVICE .539.90 PARCEL BRRVICEU 11A331 V.F. ENTERPRISES $1.519.90 TRUCE REPAIRS "AAR2 NBC sTINENTI •3.004.49 ___RBGISTMTIES 114333 VAR SCIENTIFIC f3.009.99 LAB SUPPLIUP ...... VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO f1.9R 4.91 PLUMBING SUPPLIES .53 BBFONO USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 11R337 VARIER ANALYTICAL ROD INSTRUMENTS f9$159.95 LAB SUPPLIES hall% WARNER READINESS PRODUCTS t139.95 EMERGENCY WATER tlEMSR ya00�50___,___._ COMPUTER SUPPLIES _ _ I14339 VERTEX INDUSTRIAL tl6151.41 COMPUTER LATE SUPPORT 114340 VIKING ..LUSTRIRL SUPPLY 11S1.R1 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ife & COrunxr q.3.18 REFUND VEER PEE OVERPAYMENT 114312 CALL WARREN L C f16 S.ltl ENCURARCB CLAIMS ALMINISTRATOR 114343 VATtR POLLUTION CONTROL $179.35 PUBLICATION ry srenxeCEB .11 . WATER SAVINGS PACKAGE 214349 WEAVER l NOLA f3S.30 REFVND USSR FSB LVRRFATNSNT 114346 WEAVER f NOLA $200.35 REFUND USER F88 OVERPAYMENT ITT .309.30 REFUND USER PBS OVBRPAYPBNT,_____,. 114349 VCETATES CARBON INC 20.311.90 CHEMICALS 2 114349 WEST COAST ANALYTICAL SRN f235.00 LAB SERVICES .-. r.TrRM ""'Al .....r r. IN 87L SL OU < CAUSTTIC 80UA M.O.S-R-Sb .,y II US! WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY f19.319.6a REFUND USER F88 OVERPAYMENT ...I 114352 WHIRLPOOL CORP t13l.PS n 19 . <n.. ..r ..-.n PUBLICATION D 114354 WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES INC $54.2? REFUND USER F88 OVERPAYMENT 119399 WILLOAN ASSOCIATES Sa.322.90 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-9-RI V u yRSa a[sns Cage aA2....... COPIER LEASES 113 YELLOWY NR COMPANY 192.81 PUMP PARTS 114356 SB YELLOW FREIGHT ONT SPSTCN9 Slll.lt REFIGHT PN rxr a sl.Tac_RS REFUND USER F68 OVERPAYMENT 114360 RICHARD YOUNG PROD 171.52 —gI.3C'TRSd SUPPLIES ................. TOTAL CLAIMS P#10 05/08/91 f5r191.SS 3.TO ssva...sassas..v_ FUND NO 9199 - JT DIET WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/02/91 PAGE 8 ER P COUNTY CLA SANITATION 0IBTRICTE OP ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/O0/91 POSTING DATE O5/O9/91 RI OPER FUND 4195.34 42 CAP PAC FUND _ $11813,289.30 43 OPER FUND =22,519.12 32-54'- -..-__. . 45 OPER FUND $694.32 45 CAP PAC FUND $870.50 9 47 OPER FUND $9,060.19 47 CAP PAC FUND $295,241.03 9 e 411 CAP PAC POND $29,923.56 413 OPRR FUND $35.99 4566 OPEN FUND $1,756.59 4667 OPEN POND $2,352.13 rn "7-- -- x JT OPER FUND $1,124,105.02 = CORP $510,421.79 JT DIRT NORRING CAPITAL POND $215,947.91 -4 -------------- n C6 J Fu 9199 - JT GIST BURNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5116/91 PIS[ 1 A E30RT NUMBER APt3 COUNTY N A ON2231 i Of 0 AN6 COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 9S/ /91 PO STIRS OA IC 05I22/91 —VARIANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT 114779 ASR ANALYSIS NALY313 65711.00 PUMP VIBRATION TESTING 111300 AP ROAMS COMPANY $216 IB 114381 ADVANCO CONSTRU CTDRS INC 11.231.917.90 CONSTRUCTION PI-34-2 Il1l82 AIR PRODUCTS 6 CHEMICAL IN lI5.1 N.00 O&M AGREEMENT-08Y. DEN. BYST. M.O.8-9-89 i 114383 ALTA SALES INC - f326.Y5 _ ____INSTRUMENT.PART_.____._..,___,_. 114384 AMERICAN CABLING 9 COMM t773.70 CABLE/TOOL I I143BS AMERICAN ICAN FL EEI PARTS f99.20 TRUCK PARTS i 114396 AMERICAN MEDIA INC It4387 ROSCO INC &/OR AMERICAN SEALS 99.S31.E8 GASKETS/SEALS i 11.388 AM AMEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $22,007.98 SENOR REPAIRS DIST 2 & 7 114389 BLAME P ANDENSON $7, DEFERRED_9PUP_WITNDRAYAL_.,________ 114390 ANT"ONY-S NEC" & MACHINE. INC. $579.80 MACHINE REPAIRS 1 114391 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $2.317.21 NOTICES & ADS 114392 ARATEN SERVICES INC $4,197.73 UNIFORM RENTALS _ 1 114393 NICHOLAS ARHONTES $94.80 MEETING. TRAVKL & TRAINING EXPENSE 114394 ARI2UNA '"'IR UMEMT $1.362.25 INBTRUMENT PART 114395 ASSOCt.TED CONCRETE PROD I lL20.62 EUILDING_NATEAIBLS __ 114396 ASSOCIATED SOILS EMGINECRIN6 91.SS4.00 SOIL TESTING H.0.4-11-90 1 114397 ASSO C. AD MINIS. 8 CONSUL IA tlil.OJ MEDICAL CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR f+'I t 23L32 _ . PARTS X 1140 AUTO SHOP SUIPMEET CO 125.62 TRUCK PARTS 114400 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 6108 .701.44 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.7-13-80 to,511.60 _..__. SNAINR NVING H.O.10K_-.9I1•_NS7.L8___... DU I14403 BANANA BLUE PRINT f3.911.00 BLUEPRINTING RGES -10-90 "-� 11440 BARN OF AXERICA f1.693.50 BANK CARD CHASERS 114404 00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES-P1-39-2&3. P1-95-2 to 114405 B BATEMAN f595.00 DRFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 1 114406 ANTHONY BAXTER $27.76 MEETING & TRAINING EXPENSE 1144pi BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS11A",i8 LAB_BUPPLIES_ ______ 114408 BY BILLARD INC t199.45 TRUCK PARTS 114449. BLACK BOX CORP $146.44 ELECTRIC PART 114410 9OLSA 0401ATOR SERVICE ____RADIATOR REPAIR 114411 BOOT BARN 1212.4R4 SAFETY SHOES 134412 BOYER ENGINEERING 9505.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES - DETOUR PLAN 114413 BOYLEN IN P 941.669.0o ?_17__ 114414 BRENNER-FIEDLER { ASS9C IN f102.61 XECHANICAL PARTS 114415 9AI4DERSOM CORP 91.156.491.00 CONSTRUCTION J-19-2 314416 SROVN { CALDWELL �1Q.0� LAB SERVICES 111417 BROWN & CALO YELL CONSULTING. $52.524.29 ENGINEERING SERVICES KEe-AR� 11441E CAROLYN A BRUSMIN $144.15 MEBTING EXPENSE 11.419 C. J. BRUYN >,31.5.00 LAB SUPPLIES ____._._ . 114420 BUILDERS EMPORIUM U1.03 IUTDWAREjLISIBER 114422 BUILDING NEWS INC $120.58 PUBLICATION 114422 BURKE ENGINEERING CO f1 j2T jZ_ _ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 114473 BUS" AND ASSOCIATES INC 99.735.00 SURVEY-fipRVICRA A88-nz7T—_ —� 114424 CARY G STREED $2.956.61 PE7TY CASH REIMBURSEMENT FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/IS/91 P43C 2 REPORT NUMBER API7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT& OF ORSPISE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/22/91 POSIIMS DATE 15122"1 WARMAN1 RD 116625 PUTLER PAPER COMPANY $0.132.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES CQI"MUNICATIONB BUPPLIEB__ 116127 CS CDRPANY $1.755.27 PLUMBING SUPPLIER 114120 CT MEETING PLANNERS. INC. $605.10 TRAINING REGISTRATION nlua tA.Tpm rxt a9.ac9.EB _.____.INSTRUMRNT_SUPPLIBS_ 124438 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION INC $1.238.04 TRUCK PARTS - - - —---- 111131 CALLAWAY CHEMICAL CO $2.410.76 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-8-90 • •91_____..._ _.cAMEM_IMAIR_ 111633 CARLETON ENGINEERS $1.390.00 ENGINEERING Siff—ICES B-9-SO 111634 CENTURY SAFETY JUST 6 SUPP f740.33 SAFETY SUPPLIES f f1AAN nlex t[P FM ut 599.0I_.. _ _ _ _ TRUCK..PARTB_ 11113 CHROME CRANKSHAFT INC 6 . 0 MASHING REPAIRS 111137 CORI NNE CL AYSDN $1 3155.7G MEETING 6 TRAINING E1IPeNE[ 11A439 C.I.E. . INC. S166.?5 MAP DERV;GEE._-__ 114439 COMPRES. CO• INC• S156.75 PUMP PAST 111/10 COMP pCSSOR COMPONENTS Of CA f310.08 COMPRESSOR PARTS 11AAA1 CONARD-S VT 9223.65 PHOTO 111112 CONNELLS IT PARTS t223.63 PHOTO PARTS 11/615 CONRELL 6E PARTS / DIY tm.9D TRUCK PARTS 69229.65 ELCIQRIC SUPPLIER X 111113 COXT RAC TOR•S BOON STORC f229.65 T6CXNICA1 PUBLICATION 116116 CONY[PSG CONSULTANTS 0 C $6,056.48 SOIL SAMPLING •=i L.111.41 _ _TRUCE_PMTE W 116119 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC f997.20 ELECTRIC PARTS "-� 111699 JA.IES COWAN 671.50 MILEAGE EXPENSE 11449e rRn9RY A nMEI1OU ip.T66a80_---__.. ENGINEERING_ SERVICES DIST 5ISO _ 116651 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $250.09 ANNEXATION FEE 7-171 11 116652 STATE OF CALIFORNIA f656.89 HAZARDOUS WASTE FEES N ulaxl •u lF ae apn pF Fenn l7 aTIDx A116.13____._.__. _____ HAZARDOUS WASTE TAX______._____ II445/ DANIELS TIRE SERVICE SsIt.11 TRUCE PASTS 11/159 DE AREA CORPORATION $133.30 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 9.2 - TRUCK PARTS _-- --_-_ 111137 DISCO PRINT COMPANY 2 . 6 23 MA OFFICE BUPPL bIEB 111150 OORADO ENTERPRISES INC fi 29098.2J PLANT INTENANCE 6 REPAIRS_ 11115E DUMV"nEDWAR INC f903.2Z _ PRINT PARTS i 111161 DUNA COWARDS CORP S5.90.29 PAINT GUpPLIEE - 411661 Of VALE SALES f1.0T9.67 FITTINGS 311.31___.___ E 114463 CN4 SERVICES INC f863 d RUGIME R ENGINEERING SERVICES P2-34 J-13=f 114164 EASTMAN INC f1.835.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 t1165 Fou[ATIONAL—DEVELGPMFNT sPFt Ayp�j.J] "THINK EARTH" PROGRAM 111166 ENGINEERING NEWS RECORD $97.00 PUBLICATION 111167 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC A2.70 LAB SERVICES .96 INSTRUMENT PART _ 116169 MARSHALL FAIRRES $173.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 114471 JOHN 9 FALKENSTEIN PE $3.219.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 3-7-/ f F J 9199J- JT OISi WORKING CAPITAL Pi OCESSIRTE 5/IS/91 PAGE a i` REPORT NUMBER XBEi AP17 COUNTY fnx111ilnN nlafY 7[Ig GF BRAN G1_EfDIN7Y CLAIMS PAID 05/22/91 POSTING OATE 05/22/91 .ARRANT M. A 11/671 FARR SALES 6 SERVICE f8.209.75 FILTERS .2% AIR 111173 FERRELLOAS $97.83 PROPANE 119471 FISCHER 6 PORTER CO f699.22 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES .119.92 _4Ax_BQPPLIR3 __... 319/76 FLAT A VERTICAL CONCRETE $164.00 CONCRETE GUSTING 11/477 FLO-SYSTEMS $1.632.96 PUMP PART .20.70 PUMP I14979 FORCE NFG CO.. INC f69.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES 114100 FORD TRUCK SALVAGE 979.SS TRUCK PARTS It"Al Fnnxn lx n1I Fr nMna f39.96 FILM_ 111182 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $160.27 PAINT SUPPLIES II1963 FOX ENTERPRISES $1.925.00 SAFETY CONSULTANT IIAA85 Txf FnrRMYn rn S2$133.29__.-___INRTRUMART_§NPFL146___-- _. 1L1185 FREESDN MY SUPPLY f$71.16 TRUCE PARTS 114406 AR6C NE TREY f/l•16 DEFERRED COMP OIBRRIBURION f 936..00 WATVB_PARTB__ 1IN89 CITY OF FULLER TON Sl6.D0 HATER USE /HA I1.... DANAHL LUMBER CO f398.99 WATERR/NMRDNARE I. aA T COMP PER SERVICE .uf_ aa.71a_.0 _INSTR-CEN98RVATION PNaIQTIOx MARERIALB ,_ frt 111199 BE COMPUTER SERVICE 759.69 INSTRUMENT X ...I.. BCBER RL TELEPHONE CO 75.791.69 TELEPHONE 1196ga TYRONE C.N&IVAN lur tc a$52.5L___ MEETING IICAL PARTS 1A IIA195 TYRDNE C. GIVAN 752.50 MEETING 6 TRAINING EXPENSE 111195 60pDON.S INC 71.i91.l6 SUPPLIESOFFICE SURVEYING SERVICES RES 80-72 111497 19 TYPE S GRAPHICS S102.lp PRINTING 112 111198 M.F. SCIENTIFIC $130.69 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES LA 12A.2+ ______ CHEMICALS _ 11/500 FREO A HARPER 71./60.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 119501 H0.TCH 6 KI RN INC f2.957.92 MECHANICAL PARTS HIULAUAVCONTA,NrRR a2311.X0 CONTAINER RENTALS _ 111503 OAV10 NE INI 950.00 MEETING 6 TRAINING EXPENSE 119904 MIPORTRONICS $159.41 INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION .uanR uY CTAunaun A.,... vF aXL9.R1 114506 HOERSIGER CYS CALIF INC $697.63 MECHANICAL PARTS 114507 HONEYWELL INC 2167.73 CHARTS n.ann nnxa.. n .....vxi aail.�n DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION - i 114509 J.Y. HORVATH 6 ASSOC. 72.SDO.OD CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1 114510 MOUSE OF BATTERIES S1/I.60 BATTERIES .uu• _6DpDOAi-v xnn t1a899.9B -_ --..-- ENGINEERING_SBR_V_ICEB Na0.9-12-90 114512 AS HUGHES CO INC 93.362.14 PAINT SUPPLIES 114513 HUNTER CORPORATION f163.759.70 CONSTRUCTION J-19-1 n Aa.A Cl rr nc unNIINL.TDDL9EAru a.6.Li 0•B0.__-..-...____- WATER U96_ /3/535 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STA S199.60 OFFICE SUPPLIES 114516 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $57.360.59 FERRIC CHLORIDE N.O.0-11-90 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CA°ITAL PROCESSING DATE 9IIS/91 PAGE A REPORT NUMSE9 AFAR rn •'LY--S6NIIATI ON I S I C 1CIS_OF_D dNGC-COUM .C- T -. -- CLAIMS PAID D5/22/91 POSTING DATE 09/22/91 u...... .. VLNn" •YOUNT 114517 AIPOUEST ENVIRONMENTAL CO. f3.719.75 OFFICE MACHINE 114519 PAPER nrn •556_P. —_—_. .-OFFICETSUP--. .__.. 114525 INGRLM PRPER .799.71 OPTICS SUPPLIES 1IA920 INI•L DIVING SERVICES f9.799.71 OUTFACE INSPECTION SERVICES •`•e'—�.I— IRVINE RANCH WATLOR--4STR -- •'.9N.96--- . .___._IATERUUSNT__-__....-___ _ 114523 IRVI NE RANCH WATER DISTRICT 142.32 WATER ICH ...... JLA CREDIT CORP 111S.32 MICROFICHE READER LEASE 11052E jACKGREAT R STERN —209.80----------TOOL_RRIAIR_______... 11R526 GREET CATERING SANITARY SUFP $906.09 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES MEETING 119526 JAWS LANTERNS f906.S9 DIRECTORS' MEETING eAP8N8E 119007 •ru•rN--1NSiSION S3 •n •1y 139.9i----"---..... __._TRUCK PART aueeLxss 114529 JIM•STSUSPENSION SERVICE 233.00 TRUCK PARTS I19529 JOHNS . SUPPLY f2l9.9A ELECTRIC PARTS 68.1 _HURLS 11A532 WAS PRODUCTS l299.91 SAFETY S 114532 WAS SAFETY PRODUCTS f65.94 SAFETY SHOES vM$ EA .0 .MACT8_.OIS REMOVAL___._ ._. 124535 MINT REARING INC 93.064.00 MACHINE SUPPLIES 119935 MARTIN -H"m WOpDICK ,U. !l.069.00 CONSTRUCTION 38RVIC8B 19-1-2, I-9 31.29 __TRUTRUMART_PARTB__ T'T1 114538 L L C TIP[ SERVICE $201.29 TRUCE PARTS x 119539 LAB SUPPORT f9.099.38 TEMPORARY SERVICES 119590 LAN-AIR f69.90 ELECTRIC PARTS 11R991 KIMANN. T. LE f56.50 MILEAGE -I 29 nR __Rtl43tlReRING_sERILEs PI-33 -, 114543 LIMITORAUE CORP $296.65 MECHANICAL REPAIRS tI 114544 MP LINDSTROM INC f9.T12.95 CONSULTING SERVICES - EwimNNENTAL r i-Ian GAL a•3J.A2—_.__.__.___...._OPF3U8_SUPPLIER__ i 114546 AJ LYNCH CO 61.4)1.29 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 114547 NOS NUCLEAR INC f2.153.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 12RHRR NAGS...........ua ......... _____@ITB�VALYA"�IQNJIRNSILQ DS4 RIO ,_. 110549 MANLEY•$ BOILER REPAIR CO. INC $604.19 BOILER REPAIRS 114550 MARTEN SIT2.21 GROUNDSKEEPINO SUPPLIES I 1145552 NRRa RRSHA LLR. INDUSTRIAL NDUSTRIAL TECH f999.00 VIDEO RENTAL-- ----- � -- ---�- 114553 MALT CHLOR INC $2.399.53 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 165.29._— 114556 MCMESNA ENSR 6 EQUIP f1.209.20 PUMP PARTS 119956 MCRR 4TI..CRRR SUPPLY CO 5991.2E MRCMRNICAL SUPPLIES u4556 MICRO .PA.r 1TE --f67.39__.__. _._.___ ._.-COMPUTERNTPAHTS__ __-.._. II ASSB X/CR GAGE COMPUTER il.J21.39 COMPUTER EOFTRRRB - �--����� 114559 MILLAP ELEVATOR SERVICE f972.66 SERVICE AGREEMENT 11.4.E *1 • INC—- •2.19 L.IO—_.-._._. . _. INSTRUMENT 114561 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CC 36.112.52 INSTRUMENT PARTS 114562 JAMES M MONTGOMERY 65.396.5T ENGINERRING SERVICES F( A 1199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL ` PROCESSING DATE 5/IS/91 PAGE i %EPORT NUMBER 4P43 COUNTY ANLIA1104 0ISTIIC7S OFQIJj1N6E LQDM7E ___ CLAIMS P410 15/22/9L POSTING DATE 8585/22/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR • OIYT OF Sc9IP719M.._._. _ 114563 NORTON SALT ANO/04 5454.01 SALT 214594 MOTOROLA INC COMMUNICATIONS PARTS _ 114565 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES INC $1.125.90 VACUON TRUCK SERVIMS 214566 GUST R NEWBERG CONEY CO $1,050.659.34 CONSTRUCTION P1-33 f6Yr3p__—_ OFFICE SUPPLIES_ 114568 RJ NOBLE COMPANY $6.080.08 EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIR DIST-r__ 114569 NORCAL CONTROLS INC fSSO.52 COMPRESSOR PARTS II'%7A OCCUPATIONAL VISION SrPVIcrsi3.I2 _ SAFETY GLASSES 114571 OFFICE PAVILION/INTERIOR RES 998.039.80 - _- - OFFICE FUR UR NITE __ - -- 114572 OR SYSTEMS CO $34.667.21 CHLORINE M.C.2-14-90 114471 ROBERT J BUYER 11LSL MEETING A TRAINING_EXPRESS_.__ _. 114574 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPL $390.37 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 114575 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C $239.51 TRUCE PARTS VALVES 114577 OXYGEN SERVICE $1.430.41 - -- - _- SPECIALTY GASES -- - 114578 CSDOC SELF-FUNDED MEDICAL 1 1100.090.08 PREMIUM ADVANCE 114579 COUNTY SANITATION nISTRICT64516.p6 _ REIMBURSE_WOR_KERS COMP_IN_S_URANCE FUND 114569 COUNTY OF ORANGE - INA $229.60 PERMITS 11"BT PSSI S5.105.44 TV SEWER SERVICES •• AERIAL PHOTOS TT1 114583 PACIFIC PARTS $237.75 OFFICE SUPPLIES __ X 114584 PACO PUMPS $335.89 PUMP PARTS = ilO _ EQUIPMENT RENTAL _ 114586 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS fi12.93 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS W 134587 P46E NET $53.06 EQUIPMENT RENTAL —1 11 45RP oARis uNL IM1TED i77jy1 _ TRUCK PARTS _ OU 114589 PEAT MARWICK MAIN 6 CO $10.010J8 AUDITING SERVICES 1 i14S90 NOT PENDERBRAFT $452.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION Vl I 114592 PIMA ORO SYSTEMS INC S66.23I.56 RESIDUALS REMOVAL 114593. PLAINS TRUE VALUE NAR DUANE f79.29 HARDWARE 1319, 2 = SAFETY SUPPLIES 114595 POLYPURE INC 215.262.87 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O. - 114596 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO $931.63 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES S 26e0/__—- _ INSTRUMENT PARTS 114598 PREMIUM CONM OF AMERICA 116.462.90 VIDEO PROD. 202E V3SIO-TrA310FSl-90__ 114599 PRESENTATION PRODUCTS 121B.P8 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1146ma HAROln PRIMROSE ICEF1L43L .--._—ICE 114601 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. S4.236.00 INBTRUMBNTATION INBPEC13D7TM3HTBB- 114602 PUBLISH $29.95 PUBLICATION 114603 0 SA s1ae2L3!96__ __— _._.-__.._EARTHQUAKE SAFETFN0LD00WN_S ! 114684 R41400M DISPOSAL CO 1I./11.9p TRASH REMOVAL---_ - ' 214695 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO.. INC 199.13 LAB SUPPLIES 11460E RECYC INC 18446,13 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.7-11-90 114607 P9CC CORD A REDLINE ENT $1.149.10 ---- _-- STREET 3PBEp1NU---— 114608 RED VALVE CO INC $74.05 VALVES FUND NO 1119 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL -ACCESSING 067E 5116191 PADS 6 RE-ORT NUMBER APES COUNTY SANITATIONPTR eESEA79DLC➢USTr CLAIMS PAID 3512279E POSTING DATE 05/22/91 1I4609 RED WING SHOES $104.26 SAFETY SHOES 5 _COURIER 86RVICH _ 116611 REMEDY TEPP S3r762.58 TEMPORARY SERVICES 119612 REMOVE PETER RESETTING SYS7 13,030.00 POSTAGE - 231a16 _.........PLUMING 8UPPLIEO 114614 REMOLD INC. . f137.80 MECHANICAL PARTS 114615 J R ROBERTS CORP 642.467.00 CONSTRUCTION J-23-1 fuu- .1 R RnAFRTG e6ea.Dgl.SO _. CONSTRUCTION J-7-0 114617 J R ROBERTS S7.055.79 CONSTRUCTION d-17 116618 GEORGE ROBERTSON 6669.05 MEETING d TRAVEL EXPENSE 1141M RDSLMG jai Axn rn rvi ali6a 8S. ._. .__ _ INSTRUMENT PART 114620 PEGGY RUPP $525.00 DEFERRED COMP DIeTRIBUTIDN 116621 RUTLAND TOOL 6 SUPPLY 165.34 MACHINE REPAIRS 13a➢6___.._ __ STEEL _ 114623 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP $152.90 PARTS CLBABS11 11662E SAFETY SUPPLY OF AMERICA 6467.02 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 11a90➢..111_.___._ ..__..—MANHOLE COATING. DI8T 7 114626 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $1.159.27 ELECTRIC MOTOR 114627 DOUG SARVIS SSS9.00 MEETING 6 TRAINING EXPENSE n•afa rvnx Nr cnxu aR t210•tR __ ___ME8TIN0 d TMINING EXPENSE X 114629 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT•L S84.B10.17 OCEAN MONITORING M.6.9ZIS---W = 116630 SEA COAST DESIGNS 62.107.20 OFFICE FURNITURE 111M11 Rr NRmrx INT a1",89 _ _ INSTRUMENT_SUPPLIER _ 116632 SHAMROCK SUPPLY 12.30S.99 HARDWARE --1 116633 SHURELUCK SALES S1.959.71 TOOLS lxD9 PHYSICAL EXAMS 1 116635 SLIDE MASTER $99.46 PRGSENTATIDN AIDS QY 114636 SPITH-EMERY CO S220.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.6-10-09 j.fe TMINING, REGISTRATION II463B SOFT WARCHOUSE/WESTCAN REDID Vargas COMPUTER SOFTWARE I14639 SONNENSCHEIN MATH 6 ROSENTH $1.752.73 LEGAL SERVICES - PERSONNEL i'414ft SOUTH COAST .1. .00 PERMIT FEES 114641 SO CALIF COASTAL WATER $26R.082.00 S CARPk CURS-F 0-"-Sr 114642 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO 625.027.96' POWER If 66AR SO 1.1 GA9 Co q...313.30_._...._—._.._._ _ NATURAL GAB___ 214644 SO CALIF WATER CO $32.49 WATER USE 114645 SOUVENIR PHOTO 6235.2E PHOTO SERVICES iIIL.i5 ___ DRZNRING MATBR/COOLBR RENTALS 114647 STAPEN Z SPASSOFF PE $1.430.00 "2RGINEERYNS 9ERUSCEE-PI=3G='1- - I14648 NESTALLOY INC $933.28 WELDING SUPPLIES 21.421.2L_____..___.. ._ TOOLS 116690 STERLING ART 951.09 AAT SUmuff 114651 SUMMIT STEEL S1.019.55 STEEL 114652 s11N.Pril .6$1.0a CONTRACT GROUNDIREEPING M.O.6-9-09 116653 SUNSET FORD $39.76 -TAUCR PARTS" 114654 SUPER CHEM CORP f1.523.60 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES F 11e- -,D 9199`- JT MET WORKING CAPITOL ` PROCESSING DATE 5/16191 PAGE T {� REPORT NUMBER 4P43 CLAIMS PAID 15/22/91 POSTING 00.7E O5/2222/9l WARRANT Mn I14650 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL INC 50.694.17 TOOLS PRINTING 114657 RANIN TALEBI f31.01 MEETING 6 TRAINING EXPENSE 114650 TAUBER ELECTRONICS $311.21 BATTERIES .192.62______ _____-_TRUCK_PARTS________._ I14660 TECHNICAL PRODUCTS 0 CTRLS $2.229.07 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 124661 CHARLES E THOMAS $904.51 TRUCK PARTS 1 SECURITY LACKS 114663 TOTAL PREVENTION SYSTEMS f1.000.06 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-27-1 114664 TOWNE ADVERTISERS $40.97 PRINTING _fy 4ecc .R lu rl Faun tl.SlL _TRAVEL SERVICES M.0_6_19-90 I14666 NO TRERLCE CO $211.81 INSTRUMENT PARTS- ' 114661 IS TRI PP S1.135.00 WINDOW CLEANING XHPPLv mr 13,32R.17 TRUCK PARTS 134669 JG TUCKER G SON INC 5978.32 INSTRUMENT PMTS 114670 TWINING LABORATORIES OF $5.498.09 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89 .lA o4 11.... .... en a9Isa90 _.__SAFETY SUPPLIES 114672 THE UNISOURCE CORP $114.97 PAGER 114673 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE f169.70 PARCEL SERVICES n 4c 7. vnP aa7.ur a..Sl e_nn LAB SERVICES X 114675 VWR SCIENTIFIC f2.357.74 LAB SUPPLIES = 114676 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO SG.605.59 PLUI®ING SUPPLIES p _TRUCK PARTS LTl 114670 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 9494.05 SAFETY SUPPLIES 114679 VILLAGE NURSERIES SU.37 GROUND COVER I LIAR. INSURANCE CUIMS ADMINISTRATOR Ll7 114681 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY 541.2re.B9 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-E--95- 1 114682 CHARLES WHITE f1D0.36 MEETING 6 TRAINING EXPENSES V _ OFFICE SUPPLIES 114694 WILLOAN ASSOCIATES $2.735.01 ENGINEERING 9ERVIC2-26-3 II4685 XEROX CORP S1.413.24 COPIER LEASES VALVES 114607 EVERETT H YORK CO fl{4.60 ENGINE PARTS 114608 RICHARD YOUNG PROD $1.356.83 OFFICE SUPPLIES y514.17 _ CONSTRUCTION P2-42-1 114690 RICHARD B EDGAR 5200.00 6EPEREED CORP WRTIBUTISF2 ----------------- TOTAL CLAIMS PAID OS/22/91 $5.993,559.71 I FUND NO 9199 - IT DIET WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/16/91 PACE 8 REPORT NUMBER AP43 MV-01fA�RZ9ppTY CLAIMS PAID 05/22/91 POSTING DATE 05/22/91 SUMMARY AMOUNT A2 OPEN FUND $10,706.62 A2 CAP PAC FUND $20,156.34 J OPER PGNO -116,122.77...____. A3 CAP PAC FUND MAT 15 OPER FUND $26,100.21 5-CAP FAC FUND -4294.42--.___.___-_ #6 OPEN FUND $606.97 A7 OPER FUND $27,062.26 7 CAP PAC FUND -_--i4.355.54-_.._ All OPER FUND 46.072.70 114 OPER FUND $92.14 014 GP PAC FUND • 3333-.___..__.____.___.__ A566 OPER FUND 4342.4E A566 CAP PAC FUND $9.27 OPER D -A27054.91__..._..._.._.-._ JT OPER FUND $601,472.30 CORP. $4,628,931.50 fTlSELF FIYNDED INSURANCE FUNDS II91-89D:19 ----- x JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $440,380.47 _ ______________ OO OO BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P.O.Box 8127• 10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County, Callfornia Fountain Valley.CA 9 2 7 28-81 2 7 Telephone:(71,l)962-2411 JOINT BOARDS AGENDA WEDNESDAY, JULY 17, 1991 - 7 :30 P.M. RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 Minute excerpts have been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item No. 4, it is appropriate to receive and file said excerpts: (4) (a) DISTRICT 3 Consicle—ration of motion to receive and file minute excerpt from the City of Seal Beach re election of mayor and appointment of alternate Director, as follows: (*Mayor) District Active Director Alternate Director 3 Frank Laszlo* Edna Wilson (1) DISTRICTS 1, 7 6 14 Consi eration o motion to receive and file minute excerpt from the City of Tustin re election of mayor and appointment of alternate Directors, as follows: (*Mayor) District Active Director Alternate Director 1 Charles Puckett* Richard Edgar 7 Richard Edgar Charles Puckett* 14 Leslie Pontious Richard Edgar RE ; AGENDA ITEM #6(a) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS EI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA July 17, 1991 I CB04 ALLIS AVENUE V.O.BO%B127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92928-8127 vl MAI 932-2411 MEMORANDUM TO: All Board Members RE: 1990-91 Milestones As I conclude my term as Joint Chairman, I want to convey my thanks to you for all of your support and to briefly review our major accomplishments during the past year. I think our 1990-91 milestones can be summarized as follows: 1. Permit Com Hance: First and foremost we achieved our principal o ec ive w c s consistent compliance with conditions of our NPDES ocean discharge permit. 2. Facilities Expansion and Improvements: The major emphasis in 1990-91 was placed on implementing the facilities master plan element of 112020 VISION". We administered 51 consulting design contracts for projects with a total value of $326 million; and 35 construction `% / contracts with a total project value of approximately $230 million. 3. Water Conservation/Reclamation and Sludge Reuse: A. Adopted Water Conservation Implementation Plan. B. Adopted Phased Water Reclamation Implementation Plan. C. Adopted Phase II Sludge Implementation Plan. 4. Source Control : Continued aggressive toxic source control program with -enforcement orcement actions. Toxics entering the plants were further reduced by 10% in 1990-91. 5. Le islative/Re ulator ti Acvities: Succeeded in turning back or modifying several proposed regu ations or laws not in the best interests of the Districts or their constituents; some that would cost our ratepayers $50 million per year. 6. Organizational : Experienced a 51% turnover in Board membership, largest in recent memory. A. Prepared and distributed updated and expanded General Information Book for Board Members. B. Conducted new Directors' orientation and treatment plant tour. C. Conducted two municipal debt financing workshops for Board Members. All Board Members 1990-91 Milestones July 17, 1991 Page Two of Two 7. Financial : A. Commenced implementation of 112020 VISION° debt financing program for funding a portion of Districts' facilities requirements. Achieved a bond rating upgrade from A to A+ to AA. Issued $217 million in certificates of participation. B. District No. 7 adopted a user fee program, the last District to do so. 8. Public Information/Community Relations: A. Published new General Information Brochure; published first Annual Report Executive Summary; and produced new public information video on Districts' activities. B. Districts stepped forward to defend and indemnify member agencies re Montrose/Potlach Santa Monica Bay lawsuit. 9. Wastewater Management Plan Acknowledgments: Received five awards of excellence recognizing the Districts' accomplishments. Once again, I would like to thank each of you for your support and assistance during my term as Joint Chairman. A dedicated, progressive and involved Board of Directors is the hallmark of the Orange County Sanitation Districts and key to the national leadership role that our Districts enjoy. I look forward to continuing to work with each of you in the future toward maintaining that tradition of excellence. 54/f/—, A. B. Catlin Joint Chairman ABC:sc REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN JULY 17. 1991 ,./I ) REVIEW OF 1990-91 ACCOMPLISHMENTS 2) EMPLOYEE SERVICE PINS (A) BOB OOTEN - 10 YEARS 'HEADS UP OUR OPERATIONS DIVISION THAT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OPERATING THE PLANTS AROUND-THE-CLOCK . "THE OPERATIONS DIVISION IS ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH OUR NPDES PERMIT. *BOB DOES AN OUTSTANDING JOB. (B) ED HODGES - 5 YEARS 'HEADS UP OUR MAINTENANCE DIVISION THAT KEEPS OUR $1 BILLION WORTH OF SEWERAGE FACILITIES RUNNING. "THIS INCLUDES THE TWO TREATMENT PLANTS, OVER 850 MILES OF LARGE TRUNK SEWERS AND 30 PUMPING STATIONS . ./ 'ED ALSO DOES AN EXCELLENT JOB. 3) UPCOMING MEETINGS A. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY, JULY 24TH AT 5:30 P. M. (INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS TO ATTEND:) SALLY ANNE SHERIDAN AND FRED BARRERA - OR - (BOB BELL) B . BUILDING COMMITTEE - THE BUILDING COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON THURSDAY , JULY 25TH AT 5:30 P. M. C . CONSERVATION, RECYCLE AND REUSE COMMITTEE - THE CONSERVATION, RECYCLE AND REUSE COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON THURSDAY, AUGUST 1ST AT 5:30 P . M. - END OF REPORT - MEETINGDATE July 17, 1991 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICT'S 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 & 14 DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS (RICHARDSom...GNSET ....... Qi (BEYERI ....................BARREN ..... _ (EDGAR) ........PUCKETT...... ✓ (DENESI....................BELL ......... ✓ _ (BEYER).........BARREM ..... (/ (AGE) ......................BONAMN ..... (FERRYMAN.....WAHNER ...... ✓ (HOMY)....................CABIN .......i — \� MOTH)..........STANTON ..... ✓— (SCOTT) ....................CoLL n; ......JC DISTRICT 2 (RUMMER).................COX .........._y/ — IMAM......................CULVER ......i HUNTER) .......PICKLER ...... Ll. (NELSON.C.)................DUNLAP ...... — (SCOTT).........CCLLINS ...... ✓ (PUMETT)..................EDGAR ....... N ✓ ✓ (BEYER).........BARRE ..... (HUNTER)...................BASLE........ ✓ _ (DENES) ........BOK.......... (RICE)......................EVMS......... (NOMY) ........CATLN........T (MAHONEY).................FLOM........ (FLOM).........MAHONEY..... ✓ (RCBRNLLE)................GREEN ....... (CARVER .......MAIN ......... ✓ (McCUNE)...................GRIFFIN....... (PARKER) .......NELSON.C..... JC (RICMRD80N ..............SRISET ....... L� _ (DOMTEY).......NEWTON ...... ✓ (SCH Va) .................GULLIXSCN ... ✓ (GRMET) ........PUIDO ....... . (PLUMMER) .................HART......... . (GULLUSOM ....SCHWMO ..... ✓ (SILVA) .....................KELLY ........ ..0 _ (ROT............STANTON ...... _ (A%SON ...................LAS .......�G IFLOM) ....................MAHONEY..... DISTRICT 3 y/ (CULVER)...................WIN ........._.. (DOTSON) .......SAPIEN ....... ✓_ (RICMRDSWJI ..............M[GUIGMI (ROBRAILLE) ....OREM........_(� _ (PARKER)._................NELSON.C..... M (AGE) ...........BOV ...... ✓ (MINER) ....................NELSON.K..... ✓ (NORBY) ........URN........✓/ DOWNEY)...................NEWTON...... .. —_ (SCOTT).........COLLM ......JG (CMIAP)...................PARKER ...... ✓ (MAN) ..........CULVER.......�� (HUNTER...................PICKLER ....... (NNELSON.C.) ....WMAP....... ✓ MART) .....................PLUMMER..... _� (RICE) ......-....VMS........." (EDGAR)....................PONIpUS .... JC (MANONEY)......MOM........ . (EWAR)....................PUCKETT ..... _ (McC(ME) .......GRIFFIN....... ✓ (SUBSET) ...................PULIW ....... (WLSOR........US>LO .......y/ (PULIW) ...................RICMRDSOPI MICIUROSCM...M UiCAN .... ✓ (STANTON .................AOAf........._ — WNER) .........NELSON.K..... (COX) ......................SANSONE ..... (HURER) .......PIMER ...... (DOTSON) ..................SAPIEN .......JC — (ROTN..........STAMON .....J. (GULLUSON................SCINANG ..... (JEMPSA) .......SYLVU........y_� _ (HAMMOND).................SHERIDAN DISTRICT S (ROTR .....................STANTON ...... (MILLER....................SWAN ........ ✓ _ IPLUMAERI......SAMT......... ✓ (JEMPSA) ....................SYLVIA ....... (COX)...........9ANSpi5 .....� (FERRYMdWSHERRICKREADE) .YVAINER...... LG _ (aTANTON .......ft A ........ ✓ (MOUTON-PATTERSCN .....WNCHELL .... JC DISTRICT6 — (SHERRICR .....WANNER ...... ✓ (HART)..........RUMMER..... ✓ (STAMON) ......RWN....... ✓ DISTRICT] STAFF OTHER$ SYLVESTER......... ✓ WOODRUFF ... �— (PUCKEM ......EDGAR........J.. BROM ............ ✓ ANWAR ....... (RMDE) ........WAHNER ...... ✓ ANMRSON ......... DEMIR........ (BEYER).........BARREM ..... ✓_ CLAWSON .......... REMING...... (PLUMMEBI......COX .......... ✓ DAWES............. ✓ HOPUMER..... (PULIW) ........RICHARDSON- GORCZYU......... NOWH ....... (STANTON) ......RBNP......... V HASENSTAB ........ . HOWARD...... (HAMMOND) .....SHERIDAN..... HOMES ........... ✓ HUNT......... DISTRICT 11 KYLE............... KNOPF........ ✓ LINDER............. LEE .........._✓ (MOUTON- NELLOR ............ LINDS>RDM ... PATTERSON)......WINCMELL...... NELSON............_ LYNCH........ (SILVA)..........KELLY ........ ✓_ NICHOLS ..........._ SHAW ........ T/ (ROT............STANTON ..... ✓_ OOTEN............. ✓ STONE........ J� RMUCU .......... ✓ WASON ....... DISTRICT 13 STREED............JG YOUNG ....... _ (HUNTER .......EHRLE........ ✓ VINCENT ........... ✓ `l_ � � n � ^ (BEYER).........N M RRE ..... ✓— WNSOR............_dam�` IL1� (SUN ILANG) ......PARKER.......T✓-_ (RUNUP) .......PARKER....... ` (STANTMI ......'RCTFT......... DISTRICT.. IA (MILLER (HAMMOND) .....SHERIDAN....._f� (SEYEH).........BARBERA ..... ✓ Zu+WGY�A-� (EDGAR) ........PONTIOUS..... (/ (STANTON) ......Refl ......... ✓ CX.LI+].0( O KLM'T >S)91 REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE AWD 1FEYTT07. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE �..i SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION AND REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES.DATE: -7 - l -7` Ic� I AGENDA ITEM NO. - ���J NAME: (PLEASE PRINT) &IJIA/ lnl64s HOME ADDRESS: ll�r+a C4 92631 ITY ZIP2D TELEPHONE: 7 �4 - q"SS- II7-I nn REPRESENTING: P4'r-S"c p" 't 4- (�orf�ro �S Inc, SELF OR NAME UF RGANIZATI N F28A REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARS I€f�- AS DETERMINED BY THE HAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION AND REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. '7 DATE: 7- / — AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (PLEASE PRINT) c..//f/NCS A'coowc( ✓ f'•47 vh. HOME ADDRESS: .2 l/O GUi �o(/-/gee bl/✓e Tk h hT Lein/S�//// TY • 7SU Lo7 If ZIP D TELEPHONE: - , L( Z &S Z / REPRESENTING: c� A( So A) rL0&o9AtUi4 CA 441�} (SELF U"Aft Ut UKUPPILAIIUN) F28A REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE B ARD-MEETING- A DETERMINED BY THE HAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION AND REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: -�/�/� AGENDA ITEM NO. x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x NAME: (PLEASE PRINT) w- RM, HOME ADDRESS: 49 n� (NUMLLRR/$HRLET ITYTZIP CODE) TELEPHONE: /7��1 c/ /59V—Y?94 REPRESENTING: l IdI co- (SELF ELF OR NAME OF RGANIZATION F28A REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETIN(F.- AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION AND REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: 7�/7/Qj AGENDA ITEM NO. F NAME: (PLEASE PRINT) 7s-oE HOME ADDRESS: Z/O /3Td S- �I N�UMBER S�TREE�Ta, CITY IP CODE TELEPHONE: C71Q S-14 --42• 2c �(REPRESENTING: / UD/GOrJ .lam —� SELF R NA`ME OF R ANIZATI N F28A REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE B ARD�MEETIN( .7- l../ AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION AND REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: 'I - 7 - AGENDA ITEM NO. I NAME: (PLEASE PRINT) LA41yG, ROIiSELL- HOME ADDRESS: 4o,4 69161i6 �i/(� M Thy LA c Zesten/ra C A `i L q- ITY ZIP CODE TELEPHONE: $I 7-+ - <{ V REPRESENTING: SALI'Is CL-I:C.T"rzl<� ( Ory '/}/✓�/ (SELF ORNAME OF ORGANIZATION F28A REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. ..i AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION AND REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES.DATE: ::2— I7— 1 AGENDA ITEM NO. 17 4-P 2 it A4. NAME: (PLEASE PRINT) rL (c H /9-A / ZL120WF.$'Tff— g NI P'A4' HOME ADDRESS: w�- CO Iv UMBER ST EET CITY ZIP CODE TELEPHONE: (.( 9 — 2 ^'_7 Vo (_ REPRESENTING: S6-CffS -�c�i(�^ 2.0 � (SELF OR NAME OF ORGANIZATION F28A PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY July 17. 1991 BOARD MEETING NAME - ORGANIZATION/FIRM Please Print Please Print �821e A, �C' & . JOINT BOARD MEETING - July 17, 1991 #6(a) - Report of the Joint Chairman V SEE ATTACHED REPORT. The Joint Chairman presented employees Bob Ooten and Ed Hodges with service pins for 10 years and 5 years respectively. Chairman Catlin then reported on the upcoming meetings. #6(b) - Report of the General Manager The General Manager reported that Treatment Plants 1 and 2 received the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies "Gold Award" for 1990. The award says "in recognition of its complete and consistent national pollutant discharge elimination system permit compliance during the calendar year 1990". Bob Ooten and Ed Hodges played a major role in our ability to achieve this award. He also reported that the Orange County Fair opened today and as part of our public outreach program the Districts have a booth at the Fair. We are actually sharing space with the Orange County Water District and the Municipal Water District of Orange County. There are several items being handed out to the public. One of the items is the new abbreviated brochure of our 112020 Vision" Master Plan which is in Directors' folders tonight. It is titled "Planning with Vision" which also happens to be the title of the new video on the Districts' wastewater management program that we have produced and was just completed yesterday. This video will be playing around the clock continuously at the fair grounds. We'd like to take time right now to show the video to the Directors. The video is available in 314 inch or cable as well as 14 inch that can be used for community service groups and home viewing. If any Directors would like to borrow a copy or would like staff to make a presentation to some group, please let me know or Corrine Clawson, public information officer. #7 - Annual election of Joint Chairman Procedures were reviewed and that nominations were made last month but that nominations were still opened. There was one nomination for Bill Mahoney. He was then elected unanimously. Outgoing Chairman Catlin made a few comments about serving with Director Mahoney for the last iif years and accomplishments that were met. Director Mahoney thanked the Boards for the confidence and trust placed in him to serve as the Joint Chairman. He pledged to do his best to try and fill the shoes of Buck Catlin. #8 - Annual election of Vice Joint Chairman Director Norm Culver nominated Evelyn Hart to be Vice Joint Chairman. She was then elected unanimously. Vice Joint Chairman Hart commented that she would try to live up to the comments made by Norm Culver. She concurred with Director Mahoney's goals and would try to be the best right hand possible. �J Due to the vacancy by Evelyn Hart of Chairman of District 5, nominations were opened with Phil Sansone being nominated and elected as Chairman. Director Don Roth was then nominated 8 elected Chairman pro tem of District S. /8 (Continued) The Chairman advised that the election of Evelyn Hart as Vice Joint Chairman left the Chairmanship of District No. 5 vacant. Nominations were opened. Phil Sansone was nominated and elected Chairman of District No. 5. Director Don Roth was then nominated and elected as Chairman pro tem for District 5. N16 - ALL DISTRICTS re Job No. I-9 Staff Report by Tam Dawes: Directors have been working on this project for about 1Si years. This is the construction of our new interplant utility corridor between our Fountain Valley plant and the outfall stationed at the Huntington Beach plant. Previously you have taken action to certify an EIR for the Supplement to our 1989 Master Plan. The work itself was called for in the 1989 Master Plan and it includes the construction of a new 120-inch diameter, that's a 10-foot diameter pipeline, between the plants, an 18-inch reclaimed water line which would provide water, reclaimed water, to the plant in Huntington Beach as well as an adjacent school yard and a park. It includes an 18-inch diameter digester gas line so that we can transfer our digester gas between plants for our Central Generation project, and a fiber-optics communication cable. Prior to this you also acted on a staff request to negotiate a change order to build a short section of our ocean outfall . This is the rebuilding of the old 78-inch outfall with a new 120-inch pipe. We ask that you give us authority to complete that short section under a change order with Ca1TRANS so that we could get this in prior to the full establishment of the Huntington Beach Wetlands. This short section extends through the wetlands and into the plant. The actual outfall won't be built until after the year 2000, but we didn't want to have to dig up the wetlands. We got into some permitting delays so we had to put that off. We issued an addendum to attach that little project to this big project. That project was about $1 million and our engineer's estimate for the main work was $30 million. The 1989 master plan estimated this work at $38 million. The good news is on July 2nd we received eleven bids for this work. While the estimate was $30 million, the low bid was $21,200,000+. We recommend for you to accept and approve 6 addenda that were issued for a variety of reasons and to award the contract to the low bidder, Colch 8 Sons. A question was posed as to the size of the water line being sufficient for future use. Mr. Dawes responded that this pipe would accommodate a number of projects that have been identified with a little extra for some that haven't been identified. I neglected to mention that the 18-inch water line we are building as a part of this project but we're going to be reimbursed for that line by the Orange County Water District. That's another $400,000 which will come back to the Districts. Another question was asked about why engineer's estimate was so far off from what was quoted. Mr. Dawes said the 1989 Master Plan pegged it at $37 million. When we first prepared our plans in January, we lowered it to $30 million as the climate has been excellent for receiving bids. In the addendum we did a couple of things that we think really brought the price down. When we saw some higher prices coming for the 120-inch pipe, we concrete box section. We think that had a great effect in bringing down the pipe price. We did get a pipe for the job but a number of things all went favorable to the Districts and we wound out with an excellent price and a good contractor. -2- Item #35 - DISTRICTS 1 & 2 re MP/EIR re Contract No. 2-30 Staff Report by Tom Dawes. Mr. Dawes reported that the large development includes places around Main Place in Santa Ana, Town & Country development and a ,V. large schamoozi project which is south of Town & Country. The city of Santa Ana was undertaking a large project to build sewers to serve all of this area and drain it to the west to the Districts' Bristol Trunk which goes south and then Into Plant 1. The city of Orange was planning a major project to extend the line along LaVeta to serve its new areas which are adjacent to LaVeta and includes some of Town & Country and developing areas north of LaVeta. All in all those two agencies were prepared to spend out $3.6 million to do this work. The Districts deficiency is another $500,000 to $600,000 so it started to look like some real money so we called some meeting with Orange and Santa Ana and said should we get together and do a joint project and nearly everybody feels the answer is yes. The joint project would be the construction of a District sewer south of the Orange Subtrunk which would generally follow Memory Lane in Santa Ana, across under the 5 Freeway, and go in Owens Drive in Santa Ana. And then it would go north in Parker Street and the west to Batavia Street where it would intercept large city of Orange sewers which drain in Batavia and in LaVeta. That would divert most of the drainage area that would be tributary from the Orange Subtrunk and would take away the need to parallel that subtrunk. It would also eliminate the need for the city of Santa Ana sewers and it would have the added benefit of not loading up these existing sewers in Santa Ana with the flow. So we've worked with the cities' staff and we believe that this is the most economical reason maintain sewers of this size easily. This is going to be 33", nearly 31 diameter sewer. The actions tonight are to award an engineering services contract. You could get this work, which will include an EIR Supplement. We need an EIR Supplement for this routing because it is different from the Master Plan that was adopted in 1989. After the Directors ultimately approve this action the city of Santa Ana will contribute $1.3 million to the project. The city of Orange will contribute $700,000. Those two cities will save just over $2 million between them. The Districts would put in $2 million and would have the benefits of eliminating the need to build this parallel sewer and retain capacity in Santa Ana. We' re worried that in the future there will be more redevelopment areas in Santa Ana which will need that capacity and we need to work in either Main Street or Bristol Street to build a parallel sewer. So the actions tonight are to start the environmental work to receive and file the Districts' initial study and environmental assessment, and receive the Districts' staff report, receive the project report which was mailed to you, receive the Selection Committee certification of the engineering services agreement and to approve the agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation in the amount of $223,330.00 for the engineering and environmental services. That completes my report. A question was posed by a Director of the time frame of the project in Orange. Mr. Dawes responded that we would start immediately with the EIR work and expect to have the EIR work completed by the first of the year and would be able to go to bid early after that work. The real push on the project is to complete the work in Owens Drive on the east side of Main Street. That is going to be part of rerouting of traffic while the Main Street Bridge over the Santa Ana Freeway Is taken out by CalTRANS as part of the widening and there will be no bridge for a period of time there. So we want to get in and get this work done ahead of that. We're well ahead of the developments scheduled in Orange or Santa Ana. The key to scheduling is this Cd1TRANS taking the bridge out of Main Street. -3- Item #40 - District 7 Staff report by Tom Dawes. The Directors have been working on this project for a number of years. This project is the replacement of the Michelson Pump Station. The existing Michelson Pump Station was built to serve the The new pump station that we are proposing that you award tonight wil sere Park Place development and adjacent line development and Holden (?) development. Its' a much larger pump station than the existing pump station. This is an artist's rendering of the pump station which is larger in full but it is not a big building. The building is about it feet high and will be built within the Park Place property on a sight that the Directors previously accepted at no cost from Trammell-Crow, the developers of Park Place. The station has been designed in an architectural mode approved by Trammell-Crow. The landscaping around the station will be done by Trammell-Crow so it will all fit in. The actions for tonight are to approve the four addenda and to award the contract to the lowest of 11 bids, which is Mitchell Pacific, in the amount of $1,827,136.00. The engineer's estimate was $3 million. This was another tremendously low bid. That completes my report. �../ -4- REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN JULY 17, 1991 mil ) REVIEW OF 1990-91 ACCOMPLISHMENTS 2) EMPLOYEE SERVICE PINS (A) BOB OOTEN - 10 YEARS "HEADS UP OUR OPERATIONS DIVISION THAT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OPERATING THE PLANTS AROUND-THE-CLOCK . `THE OPERATIONS DIVISION IS ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH OUR NPDES PERMIT. `BOB DOES AN OUTSTANDING JOB. (B) ED HODGES - 5 YEARS 'HEADS UP OUR MAINTENANCE DIVISION THAT KEEPS OUR $1 BILLION WORTH OF SEWERAGE FACILITIES RUNNING. `THIS INCLUDES THE TWO TREATMENT PLANTS, OVER 850 MILES OF LARGE TRUNK SEWERS AND 30 PUMPING STATIONS. 'ED ALSO DOES AN EXCELLENT JOB. 3) UPCOMING MEETINGS A. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY, JULY 24TH AT 5:30 P. M . (INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS TO ATTEND:) SALLY ANNE SHERIDAN AND FRED BARRERA - OR - (BOB BELL) B. BUILDING COMMITTEE - THE BUILDING COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON THURSDAY , JULY 25TH AT 5:30 P . M. C. CONSERVATION , RECYCLE AND REUSE COMMITTEE - THE `.. CONSERVATION, RECYCLE AND REUSE COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON THURSDAY, AUGUST 1ST AT 5:30 P. M. - END OF REPORT - 'RE: AGENDA ITEM #6(a) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 0 GRANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA July 17, 1991 1O96 ELLIS AVENUE J l no Box 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92128-8127 71A1e82-2N1 M E M O R A N D U M TO: All Board Members RE: 1990-91 Milestones As I conclude my term as Joint Chairman, I want to convey my thanks to you for all of your support and to briefly review our major accomplishments during- the past year. I think our 1990-91 milestones can be summarized as follows: 1. Permit Compliance: First and foremost we achieved our principal objective which is consistent compliance with conditions of our NPDES ocean discharge permit. 2. Facilities Expansion and Improvements: The major emphasis in 1990-91 was placed on implementing the facilities master plan element of 112020 VISION". We administered 51 consulting design contracts for projects with a total value of $326 million; and 35 construction `...� contracts with a total project value of approximately $230 million. 3. Water Conservation/Reclamation and Sludge Reuse: A. Adopted Water Conservation Implementation Plan. B. Adopted Phased Water Reclamation Implementation Plan. C. Adopted Phase II Sludge Implementation Plan. 4. Source Control : Continued aggressive toxic source control program with 90 enforcement actions. Toxics entering the plants were further reduced by 10% in 1990-91. I. Legislative/Regulatory Activities: Succeeded in turning back or modifying several proposed regulations or laws not in the best interests of the Districts or their constituents; some that would cost our ratepayers $50 million per year. 6. Organizational : Experienced a 51% turnover in Board membership, largest in recent memory. A. Prepared and distributed updated and expanded General Information Book for Board Members. B. Conducted new Directors' orientation and treatment plant tour. C. Conducted two municipal debt financing workshops for Board Members. All Board Members 1990-91 Milestones July 17, 1991 Page Two of Two 7. Financial : A. Commenced implementation of "2020 VISION" debt financing program for funding a portion of Districts' facilities requirements. Achieved a bond rating upgrade from A to A+ to AA. Issued $217 million in certificates of participation. B. District No. 7 adopted a user fee program, the last District to do so. B. Public Information/Community Relations: A. Published new General Information Brochure; published first Annual Report Executive Summary; and produced new public information video on Districts' activities. B. Districts stepped forward to defend and indemnify member agencies re Montrose/Potlach Santa Monica Bay lawsuit. 9. Wastewater Mana ement Plan Acknowled ments: Received five awards of excellence recogniz ng the Districts accomplishments. Once again, I would like to thank each of you for your support and assistance `✓ during my term as Joint Chairman. A dedicated, progressive and involved Board of Directors is the hallmark of the Orange County Sanitation Districts and key to the national leadership role that our Districts enjoy. I look forward to continuing to work with each of you in the future toward maintaining that tradition of excellence. A. B. Catlin Joint Chairman ABC:sc JULY 17, 1991 ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING #17 - ALL DISTRICTS - Re protest & award of Job Nos. J-23-2/P2-44 Tom Dawes gave a staff report on this project. Said that this was also a master-planned project. It includes the award of a contract for a new computer system for both of our treatment plants. Today we have a computer system in our Huntington Beach plant which receives data and massages data a little bit. At this plant we have no computers in place. We have warning lights and signals which we receive in our control center. This project will install a new ? control center at both plants and this will be quite a bit different than our existing system. Our operators will have a greatly enhanced ability to receive data, to massage data and to use it at any of a number of systems. Briefly, the distributed-control system includes central computers at our Control Building at Plant 1 and Plant 2. It includes a dual fiber-optic system throughout the plants which is connected to data concentrators and each of the major processes in the plant. For instance, to primary sedimentation, our headworks data, our dewatering of facilities' digester, central generation and our secondary treatment facilities. All of these will have distributed computer controls and monitoring functions at the site, although they will be received and operated back at the Control Center. On the last item you awarded the Interplant Line, that included the fiber optics plate between the two plants so that all of the data can be received from Plant 2 at Plant 1 and all of the data from Plant i at Plant 2. Plant 2 will have the same dual fiber-optics system which will go around to all the processes. This will give us a great deal of flexibility. Our existing computer control system at Plant 2, is an old, out-dated system which the manufacturer no longer provides service or parts. As part of this work, the 1989 Master Plan recognized this and called for this computer system, and subsequently you awarded a contract to EMA to prepare the plans and specifications for this work. A year ago in August of 1990, upon EMA's recommendation, you accepted their recommendation to limit the supply of the computer equipment to five firms. Ultimately, four firms were included in the specifications; the fifth firm had been giving the Districts very poor service and they were eliminated from the documents. Four bids were received in May for this work. They ranged from the low bid of $3.75 million by HSQ Technology, which is supplying approved Allen-Bradley equipment, to a high bid of $5.15 million. Tonight you have protests that you'll have to act on. These protests have been filed by some of the other equipment suppliers and installers, and they are filing protests on the basis that they believe that the low bid contractor and its supplier, Allen-Bradley, did not fully comply with the plans and specifications. You will also hear from the designer, EMA, and from staff, that we believe that they can comply, and we have no reason to recommend to you any other action other than to award to the low bid. As we get into this, the first actions on your agenda are to approve the addenda we sent out. Addendum No. 2 is one of the issues that you'll be hearing about from the other manufacturers. Addendum 2 calls for a marriage between the installer and the supplier. The issue there is we want to make sure that the equipment manufacturer have a direct hand in making sure that in furnishing and start-up and making sure that the software, which is the heart of the project, is compatible with the equipment and that the system will work. Allen-Bradley, the supplier, and our contractor, have given us letters saying that they can, in fact, comply 100% with the requirements of the addenda and the plans and specifications. �.J r. Chairman, I would recommend that you receive and file the letters and approve the addenda, and then open the public hearing. ITEMS (17) (b,c,d,e,f &g) It was then moved and seconded to receive and file documents and letters received. The motion carried by unanimous ballot. Director Culver then asked when Addendum No. 2 sent to the bidders. Mr. Dawes responded the bids were received on the 20th or 21st of May. Addendum No. 2 went out about two weeks ahead of that. Joint Chairman Mahoney then opened the floor for public comments after setting �./ down ground rules of 10 minutes per company. Six individuals. Two people from Sachs - total 10 minutes. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Sachs Electric Com an - Richard Zuroweste, Regional Manager: Sachs Electric ompany is a nationa electrical contractor with a sales volume in excess of $65,000,000 per year. Our sales market is focused basically on industrial customers such as the Orange County Sanitation Districts. Representing us here tonight are Nick Pregibon of Westinghouse and Heather Wells of Westinghouse, Craig Rossell of Hunt-Ortman of Pasadena and Mr. Sam Clarke of Sachs Electric who is sitting in the back. At this time I would like to turn over our presentation to our counsel , Mr. Craig Rossell. Craig Rossell: I don't know if it's possible to add to the agenda in ad hoc fashion a motion or motions to have the contract awarded to Sachs Electric and have the two lower bids set aside but if it's possible to bring that before the Boards tonight, we would like to do that. Sachs Electric is the lowest responsive bidder on this contract. I want to show you some language from some of the specifications which clearly demonstrate this. Because our time is so limited, it really does not permit any type of concrete or complete analysis of what we find happening here. But I'd like to begin by having you refer to Section 52.0370 of the specifications which provides, in part, that the contractor shall provide standard control systems. A standard control system is one which is available at time of bid with fully-tested, field-proven software and hardware, full documentation and prepared training classes such that no development must be done beyond system configuration and application software. And the part I have marked in green is "custom software and custom hardware will not be accepted". As was just explained to you on May 7 of this year Addendum No. 2 to the bid invitation was sent out and I have excerpted a portion of the addendum to provide you with this language, "Add the following to Section 52.0370 standard control systems...The data concentrator manufacturer shall provide all operation and application software associated with the system described in these specifications". In deference to what Mr. Dawes stated just a moment ago, this language does not appear to simply give the manufacturer a hand in the creation of application and operation of software. It states that the data concentrator manufacturer shall provide all operation and specification software. The key elements of Sachs' system are displayed here. The four essential elements of the system are hardware, software, application software which, as we just read, is to be provided by the data concentrator manufacturer. That's part of the hardware. And operations maintenance. In Sachs' case each of these key elements of the system are provided by Westinghouse. As the specifications provide, Westinghouse is a prequalified data concentrator manufacturer with a proven record in the field of the standard system it wants to provide as part of this contract. I don't think that either of the two lower bidders can make a comparable claim, and such a claim is required as I read the specifications, as part of the bid package. I want to show you just briefly part of a letter that we, Sachs, received from Westinghouse in the middle of May. It gives you some idea about what Westinghouse is prepared to offer. I 'm just going to read portions of what I have highlighted. "All equipment and services will be our standard product offering." And then it goes on to state that certain training will be provided at the Riverside, California facility. We will perform all engineering necessary in order to furnish, to supervise -2- installation and to place into operation all distributed control equipment as defined herein. We will assume responsibility for the functional operation of the system we provide." That's quite a contrast to the documentation you'll find in your package from Allen-Bradley. Sachs' system is $1.4 million below budget and yet it meets every specification in the bid invitation. One of the key elements of what the District requires is future expansion and modification. It's critical in our view that a manufacturer like Westinghouse provide this because when changes need to be made in the system in the future, you'll have one source of support, one source of responsibility; whereas, you'll see in a moment that responsibility is divided in at least one other case, the lowest bidder, in violation of the specifications. Let me show you what you get with HSQ's bid. You get hardware provided by Allen-Bradley, you get software provided by Allen-Bradley. But, contrary to what the specifications require, the application software is not provided by the data concentrator manufacturer. It is provided by HSQ, the contractor. Similarly for operations and maintenance there seems to be a combination of HSQ and/or Allen-Bradley, so that when the contractor has installed the system and the parts and the District is left with the equipment suppliers' responsibility for what happens next is going to be a combination of whatever Allen-Bradley or HSQ is prepared to provide at that point. With regard to JWP, this is the second lowest bid. But just one comment, although JWP provides all of the key elements of its system, it is not a pre-qualified data concentrator manufacturer. On that ground alone that bid is non-responsive. I'd like to speak for a moment about Public Contract Law in California. I believe the Districts are legally bound to award this contract to the lowest responsive bidder. I want to refer you briefly to a 1988 4th District case called Konica Business Systems vs. Regents of the University of California. In that case the court considered the application of Public Contract Law to a request for quotation which was prepared by the University for a charge-per-page �-/ contract for copying. The lowest bidder was a company called Copy Line. Copy Line was awarded the contract. There was an objection. There was a lawsuit filed and on appeal. The Court of Appeals found that certain items of equipment listed in Copy Line's bid were inferior to what was called out in the specifications. Specifically, Category 5 machine was supposed to provide you with at least 40 pages of copying per minute and other features; a Category 6 machine was to provide 55 pages of copying per minute and other features. In each case, Copy Line could not deliver. The court, on the other hand, found that Konica could either meet or exceed every specification in the bid package. In ruling for Konica the Court of Appeals rules the following. The University must award contracts for goods, materials and services to the lowest responsible bidder meeting specifications. Meeting specifications is italicized. The court goes on to state, "neither Copy Line nor the University directly dispute the fact that strict adherence to the specifications would have resulted in an increased bid for Copy Line. The sole claims are that Copy Line equipment is acceptable to the University in spite of its lack of capacity and specialized features and that Konica has not shown it would have made a lower bid if it had deviated from the specifications. Regardless of what Konica might have bid had it also deviated, the record is clear that Copy Line, by deviating from the specifications, obtained a competitive advantage by not meeting the minimum capabilities specified. We conclude the request for quotation can only be Interpreted as setting minimum performance specifications for the copier with which bidders were required to strictly comply. To permit the University to allow deviation from precise specifications in its public call for bids leaves bidders in the unfair position of having to guess what will satisfy the University's needs. Bidders were entitled to expect bids which did not meet the �../ specifications would be rejected in favor of those which did, or the contract would be rebid. -3- Finally, we conclude that the contract must be set aside since the deviations from the specifications gave Copy Line a competitive advantage and the RFQ did not clearly notify bidders they could bid on machines not meeting the listed specifications. Just one other item. One of the letters that has been received into evidence tonight is a June 6th, 1991 letter from Allen-Bradley to the District. Commenting there on certain issues which are the subject of our protest, Allen-Bradley refers to the addendum being held there to my right. And quoting the first sentence of that, Allen-Bradley states, "the data concentrator manufacturer shall provide all operation and application software associated with the system described in the specifications." Then, the following, "Allen-Bradley will work closely and cooperatively with the data concentrator supplier, HSQ Technology, to provide standard commercial software which meets the project requirements." There is a very clear indication that Allen-Bradley is not providing that software. It is simply working with the contractor who is providing it. In talking this over, we have given thought to why the specifications were prepared and written in the way that they were, and we have concluded that they were written this way to ensure that when the contractor steps out because the system is in place, and the equipment suppliers step in for servicing and maintenance and modifications to an elaborate computer system, there will be one single source of support, one single source of responsibility. With HSQ, the lowest bidder, that source is either HSQ or Allen-Bradley and you don't know which. The sum of the letters that have been received in evidence have also commented on Sachs contention that HSQ's system 1s technically inferior to Sachs. Now, it sounds to me as though all is well with the District because HSQ has somewhat glibly stated that it takes no exceptions to the specifications. I urge the District to not take that quite so lightly. More time needs to be devoted to those issues. I think it will pay off in the long run if they are because the system that HSQ offers is going to provide certainly logistic problems, at the least, down the road. Chairman Mahoney: One more minute, Mr. Rossell , please. Craig Rossell : Let me just ask the Districts to consider their duty under applicable California law. There is a duty in public contracting to award the contract to the lowest responsive bidder. In this case the lowest responsive bidder is also responsible. Sachs Electric and Westinghouse provide a great team for this contract and we urge you to set aside the two lower bids and accept the bid of Sachs Electric. Thank you. Chairman Mahoney: The next speaker we have is Modicon, Inc. There are two gentlemen, I understand, who wish to speak on this matter, Joe Melton and Ken Jennings. Please come forward and give your presentation. You are limited to 10 minutes total between the two of you. Modicon Inc. - Our presentation is very brief and without props but, I think, ver� . We believe that the specification has been written, unfortunately, with an unfair advantage to Allen-Bradley. AB was the only PLC vendor allowed to bid vs. 3 DCS vendors. It is quite a different technology and it provides an unfair economic advantage. It is evidenced by the fact that their bid was 26% less than the DCS bids, while the DCS bids were 1% apart. We believe that the open bidding process was forgone. PLCs were not allowed to bid when we asked about our eligibility to participate in the project. We were told that PLCs were not allowed, that DCS was the preferred technology. PLCs, however, now are being considered. The reason for our concerns are that we believe that we can save the Districts considerable sums of money, and we believe we can do that because we have a communications system that is 50 times faster than the one that is being considered right now, which can dramatically -4- reduce the number of data concentrators all together, if not maybe even eliminate them. So if you are looking at 10 redundant systems taken down to a very minimal amount, we are looking at well in excess of one-half million dollars of savings to the Districts by doing that. That is not even to mention �..i installation costs, training costs, engineering costs and maintenance costs that further savings can be made. Again, along the lines of expandability and flexibility, your future is because we are using a standard, existing product line. Your future expandibility and flexibility is built in and your future maintenance and engineering costs, as well as training costs, because you have a considerable amount of existing hardware that we have already provided to the Districts. Overall , we are looking at, we believe, a savings, if you relook and do allow PLC vendors, we would like to get back into the system and we believe that we could save anywhere from one-half to one million dollars over the existing consideration. Chairman Mahoney: Thank you. The next speaker is Johnson Yokogawa Company, Mr. James Murphy. Johnson Yokogawa Corporation - James Murphy: Thank you. I 'm James Murphy with Johnson Yokogawa. We are a distributing control system manufacturer principally in the water and wastewater treatment market place. I don't have much to say tonight. I think Sachs Electric put it very well and pretty much our protest concurs with theirs. We believe that the HSQ/Allen-Bradley bid to you would be non-responsive. Our company has an affiliation with Allen-Bradley that is quite high up and it is our understanding that Allen-Bradley does not, is not, prepared to accept any responsibility for any of the software to be provided as was indicated by the quote on conmerically-available software. Also, there is the issue of if this was an acceptable bid, then perhaps some of the companies involved in the bidding process would have realigned themselves if they knew that this type of alliance was acceptable. I think that we would have looked at the possibility with aligning ourselves with somebody such as an HSQ and supply only hardware for this project, had we known that would have been allowable. We believe that the specifications' intent was that it would not be allowable; that you wanted a single source of supply; that you wanted the person who supplied your system to be able to support it after it was installed and for the expansions that you have coming up. That is all I really have to say. I hope you'll take that into consideration and deny this award to HSQ and Allen-Bradley. Thank you. Chairman Mahoney: Thank you, Mr. Murphy. The last speaker we have is Kevin Renek and he is with Pacific Parts and Controls, Inc. Pacific Parts and Controls, Inc. - Kevin Renek: One other thing that Allen-Bratll ey and HS have said in their defense is the factual claim that they can meet any of the specifications. Basically, they are saying we don't have to prove it and our competition doesn't have any proof because they don't have any documentation and basically we can't get documentation from them so we can't prove that. In this one letter. June 7th from HSQ, in the back of that there is what seems to be a copy of documentation. It looks like a brochure type of thing from Allen-Bradley describing the HSQ Technology Miser Software. At the very end of the software, or at that thing, it says that Allen-Bradley is not responsible for any inadvertent errors and does not sell or support HSQ Technology software. So, basically, in their own documentation they are saying, and this is from a letter dated June 7, so I don't things have changed too far, they are saying that they do not support the software. As Sachs pointed out, it was specifically stated that the software should be supplied by the data ..i concentrator manufacturer and HSQ is not the data concentrator manufacturer. -5- They are the systems analyst, and the data concentrator manufacturer that we will work closely with and cooperatively with, but they haven't said we will support the software outright, and seeing how other software can be used on their hardware, I don't see how they could support everybody's software. They are basically a hardware manufacturer and, as generally is Modicon, but we also have software that we sell and support through a 24-hour 800 hotline. For that reason we agree with them that this doesn't meet the specifications and if they are going to be accepted, being a PLC manufacturer, we do believe the District can do much better with a more flexible system, a better performance system and, in addition, save money from Modicon or possibly another vendor, if they were allowed to bid or knew they were going to be accepted past these verbal interpretations. Thank you. Chairman Mahoney: Thank you. Allright, I believe that concludes all of the parties that wish to address the Board on this item. We will now move on to consultant and staff responses to the comments we have just heard. Tom.... Tom Dawes: Mr. Chairman, the comments you heard from the other bidders starting with Sachs and their supplier, Westinghouse, which was the third bidder and Johnson which was the fourth bidder, we are prepared to respond to those in detail . But, before we do that I just want to say that the basic issue here is not how good Westinghouse is. Westinghouse was qualified by ?? to do this job and we take no exception to all of the things that they said about Westinghouse and how they could do the job. The issue is only "can the low bidder, Allen-Bradley, do the job?" Can Allen-Bradley supply the hardware and can Allen-Bradley supply the software in team with HSQ and do this job and meet the letter and the law of these plans and specifications as they were amended by the addendum. Now, and we believe the answer is yes, we believe there is really no way that we could say that they cannot meet them. What I would like to do now is to ask our designer, Joe Herti of ERA, (EMA is in Arizona and they have prepared the plans and specifications and made the recommendations regarding this equipment) and I would like Mr. Herti to respond to you on these issues. Joe Herti , EMA: Thank you, Tom. Basically, what we have been hearing tonight from Westinghouse isn't anything different from what we have heard or seen in the letters submitted already. Our response to that was that we didn't see any reason why HSQ/AllenBradley could not supply the system as specified. They are not taking any exceptions, and I have not changed my mind due to anything I have heard here tonight. Relative to comments made by Modicon, this is something new that I haven't heard. However, I'd like to say at the time we did the bidding, PLCs were not the issue. It had to do with the system. At that time, Modicon did not have a system that met our requirements. Since then, they have developed their system. They have an excellent system now which could work well but at the time the specifications were put together, it did not exist. Director Sheridan: Excuse me, Mr. Chairman. I understand that this issue is highly technical in nature and since this issue is rather unusual that the Boards of Directors would have these types of issues, I wonder if it might be appropriate, and I'm asking for your counsel , if we could have ?? type of committee to help the Directors understand the technical issues and make a recommendation for those of us ?? Chairman Mahoney: Well , I think. I don't know that we really need to get involved in the technicalities. I think what we are basically looking at is �..i whether or not we have complied with the bid requirements and, in fact, bids were received and acted upon properly. The bidders did, in fact, fulfill the -6- requirements of the bid specifications. I think what we're hearing here is ,lust a rebuttal to the facts that they are indicating that there is a difference in the technology. I'm not altogether as concerned about that myself, in that I think we have a contractor here that has said he will provide a product. The question is whether or not he provided his bid in accordance with the bid �..i specifications. We're listening to that now. They are indicating that they did not and, in fact, they cannot. They are indicating that the bids, that the bid was not submitted in accordance with the specifications. I think what we' re hearing here is rebuttal to that. I will reserve that question to later because I was going to ask counsel afterwards what are options are in dealing with this matter. And certainly once we hear from our consultant I would entertain that as a consideration but, if we could... Director Sheridan: My point is that we review ?? Chairman Mahoney: I understand that and certainly what we are here to do this evening is to listen to what we have. If we feel at that time, Director Sheridan, that we are not ready to do this, I totally agree with what your position is. Continue Mr. Herti. Joe Herti : Thank you. I really don't have much more to say other than that at this point my mind hasn't changed based on the letter that EMA has provided already to the Districts. We still believe that HSQ/Allen-Bradley can provide the system. Chairman Mahoney: Alright. Questions? Director ? : A wide variation in the bids seem to be that the low bidder's ?? and the other bidders ?? . Can you explain the disadvantages ?? . Obviously, a pr�Fi ice is a great deal less and I understand the programming part of it but is there any disadvantage to the dcs �..i system? Mr. Herti: No disadvantage to the DCS system. All the bidders knew up front that Allen-Bradley was one of the qualified bidders on this project so it didn't come as a surprise or shock to any of them who have the PLCs. Director Catlin: Is there an issue on whether the contractor has to buy the equipment or can he use another contractor? Westinghouse seems to be saying that they can provide all of their subparts whereas Allen Bradley/HSQ can just subcontract pieces ?? Chairman Mahoney: I think we would have to defer that to legal counsel because I think you're getting into the legal area in this particular case, Buck. John Shaw: Yes. Our answer to that is that, in fact, the protestors are defining the word "provide" the way best benefits them. We do not see the word "provide" as designating that here Allen-Bradley must produce its own kind of software. They would be left to their own means to present it to the District and, in fact, the District would go forward in an award-of-contract situation here, and legally require that the specs be met by way of contract provisions that would need to be entered into. Also, another key point on this again that was pointed out earlier is that Allen-Bradley was designated up front as one of the eligible bidders and the staff report indicates that the intent of the staff language in the bid specs, Including the addenda, was to make sure that in the end, this concentrator-manufacturer be responsible. So, I think it would be contradictory to say that on one hand we wanted Allen-Bradley as an eligible bidder and then to put out an addendum and pull them back. -7- Chairman Mahoney: Director Edgar. Director Edgar: One of the questions I think that with complex material like that, we have typically had pre-bidder conferences where people convene and ask questions to understand some of the issues. Was such a pre-bidder conference held? Joe Herti: Yes. We held a pre-bid conference, questions were generated and the answers to those questions and the questions were issued with Addendum No. 2. Director Edgar: So basically what you are saying is that there was a pre-bidder conference, everybody who showed for the bids came to the conference and had an opportunity to ask any questions that they chose to and presumably they had a full understanding of the options before they left. Director Collins: I appreciate the legal counsel 's legal opinion. From a standpoint of application of the bid process, and as you've seen it over the years, and you've obviously experienced it personally, is it reasonable to assume that the language in the bid was misleading? Can it be reasonably construed to be misleading because that is the contention that I hear--that, gee, if we had only known and that language hadn't said that, yeah, maybe ? is qualified because of ? Joe Herti: That question was raised I believe in the pre-bid conference. We could refer to the minutes from that, but I believe that question was specifically ? whether or not you had ? directly with v? Director Collins: Which is the implementation of the ?? misconception ?? Is that correct? �./ Joe Herti: Yes Director Collins: I have one question for legal counsel , if I could, and you could respond to it. Do we have a surety and performance bond for this? John Shaw: Yes, we do. Director Norman Culver: Mr. Chairman, is this a joint venture between HSQ and Allen-Bradley? John Shaw: No, it is not. Our contract will be with HSQ and then HSQ, in turn, will have a subcontract with Allen-Bradley. Director Culver: I 'm a little bit disturbed, the last gentleman who spoke read the letter and I couldn't find it. Something that Allen-Bradley said they couldn't complete the ? or something to ?? . They wouldn't be responsible. Alright, Mr. Chairman, 1 got t here, it says that Allen-Bradley was not responsible for any inadvertent errors ?? for HSQ Technology software. What does that mean, Mr. Shaw? John Shaw: You' re reading from what document? Director Culver: This letter is sent out by Allen-Bradley on the Director ? : Could we have HSQ and Allen-Bradley respond to that? Chairman Mahoney: Let me give legal counsel a moment. Yes, let's have them speak to it. -8- Tom Dawes: Jim McLellan from HSQ is here. Jim, why don't you come up and respond to that question, and someone from Allen-Bradley. Director Robert Main: Mr. Chairman, I'm getting more buried in technical things. I have a computer of my own and know where the on and off switch is. But this is way beyond me. I think that the speaker over here, Director Sheridan, I like what she had to say about having somebody study this because my feeling is I'm not going to grasp it, especially when I read what this says. I understand when they say they are not responsible. Chairman Mahoney: Okay, fine. Frank. Director Frank Laszlo: This sounds like it could be potential litigation. My experience is ? . Should we throw everybody out and ask for ? and so I want to raise that question ? John Shaw: We haven't had any threats of litigation per se. I don't think closed session would be appropriate at this point. In the staff report we do point out that after considering all the information, you have one option available which is, in fact, to reject all bids. Director Evans: The speaker who came up and said he was not permitted to bid on this ? but had improved technology and equipment that would do the same job and possibly even save the Districts somewhere between one half and one million dollars, I think we ought to go back to the drawing board with this and see if tyhat is true and let's have some ? bids ? Director Stanton: Mr. Chairman, if this bid process is without fault. If it is done according to ? in the professional manner that our staff has always shown in the past, then I would say to reject anything at this point or to backtrack at this point is to say that this is flawed. I don't believe it ..i was. I think it was ?? and I don't know if ?? but I certainly would be willing to accept the bid sheet and go ahead and award the contract to the low bidder. Seconded by one of the Directors. Chairman Mahoney: Alright. We have a motion and a second before us. John Shaw: I've had an opportunity to look at this document and I think it is appropriate that Allen-Bradley be given the chance to speak to this, but this document that you read from is a standard form they had in 1990 as an attachment. Again, talking about the bid package submitted to the District, there is nothing on the face of the bid package, of which this not a part, indicating deviation from our requirements and, secondly, again, when we go to execute the contracts, guarantees would be required from HSQ and Allen-Bradley as to the responsibility of the software. Would you want to add anything to that? Chairman Mahoney: We'll allow you a couple of minutes to address it. We have a motion and a second. We will hold....yes, Mr. Culver. Director Culver: Can I call the question? I don't know why Roger wants to railroad this thing but I think ? has a very good idea to hold We have subcommittees on other things that weren't quite clear. It would only take maybe a couple of meetings with a subcommittee of people that understand this ?? and design, ? Mr. Edgar. With these people who understand ?? I'm not saying that these people's equipment is better than the one we're thinking about putting in but we don't know at this point. I think we need to have a subcommittee to look at it. -9- Chairman Mahoney: Thank you. What I 'm going to do right now is let these two gentlemen speak briefly to address this issue and then we' ll take up what action we are going to take. HSQ Technology - James McMillan: My name is James McMillan. I am with HSQ �..i Technology. The gentleman on my left is Lou Cline with Allen-Bradley Company. First of all , let me state that that cut sheet that the gentleman was referring to is a standard catalog data sheet and was published some time ago. It was attached to my letter to the Board and it was attached strictly as an illustration that, in fact, HSQ and Allen-Bradley have worked together in the past and have a cooperative arrangement. Allen-Bradley does not sell off-the-shelf HSQ software. That's true. And in that sense that comment was taken completely out of context. The other thing that was completely taken out of context was the quote from Allen-Bradley's letter where a rather vague reference was made to standing behind or supporting HSQ and working closely with. That was taken out of context. If the entire letter had been read, it would have been an unequivicable statement by Allen-Bradley that they stand by and will support, will check and review our designs and guarantee the software and will be there through the duration of the contract. Lou, do you have anything to add to that? Lou Cline: No. I would just like to clear up a couple other things that I think were taken out of context. I have heard on at least one occasion that Allen-Bradley is only a hardware supplier. My title with Allen-Bradley is the Manager of the Program Management Group. I have profit-and-loss responsibility for the systems business that we do within the government arena. As part of that we have got a number of fine engineering organizations. We routinely take on systems projects. At times we do the work ourselves, and others we subcontract. We are more than just an equipment supplier. We are a systems supplier. What we endeavored to do on your requirements here was work with HSQ to develop a system solution. We have done that. We have developed a solution which meets all of the specifications which we, the Allen-Bradley Company, stand behind and assume responsibility for, and we will certify that. So we feel we are 100% compliant. James McMillan: One more comment, please? At this present time the Alien-Bradley Company and HSQ are also jointly putting together a system for the City of Greenbay wastewater treatment plant with similar architecture using similar hardware and software. Chairman Mahoney: Thank you. Buck, you had a question? Director Catlin: I'm going to speak in favor of Roger's motion for the following reasons. ? at the Executive Board and I have never seen a more complicated set of plans and state of the art. Now, I myself am an electrical engineer in computer technology but it is extremely difficult for me to follow this. That is why we hired professionals to evaluate it. I would say that ?? that is where we should address it, but as far as I'm concerned ?? I think we should proceed. Chairman Mahoney: Alright, thank you. We have called for the question. We will take a...how should we do this? I guess we will take a voice vote. All in favor signify by saying aye. (Ayes) Opposed? (Nays). Alright, it sounds like the motion carries to award the contract, or to basically deny the opposition and to award the contract. We are also going to have to pass Item (k) which is a rejection of a bid of JWP Controls as being non-responsive. It was then moved, seconded and carried with no opposition. -10- Chairman Mahoney: By majority on the prior. On (1) we made a majority vote, correct. I'm advised that we are going to have to move Resolution No. 91-126 awarding Job Nos. J-23-2 and P2-44. I will need a motion and a second. (So moved and seconded). I will ask for...is there any opposition? Alright, all in ..� favor signify by saying aye. (Ayes) Opposed? (Nays) Motion carries by unanimous consent, excuse me, by majority vote. I 'm sorry. I have that all the time. The teeth, you know! -11- JULY 17, 1991 ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING #17 - ALL DISTRICTS - Re protest & award of Job Nos. J-23-2/P2-44 Tom Dawes gave a staff report on this project. Said that this was also a master-planned project. It includes the award of a contract for a new computer system for both of our treatment plants. Today we have a computer system in our Huntington Beach plant which receives data and massages data a little bit. At this plant we have no computers in place. We have warning lights and signals which we receive in our control center. This project will install a new ? control center at both plants and this will be quite a bit different than our existing system. Our operators will have a greatly enhanced ability to receive data, to massage data and to use it at any of a number of systems. Briefly, the distributed-control system includes central computers at our Control Building at Plant 1 and Plant 2. It includes a dual fiber-optic system throughout the plants which is connected to data concentrators and each of the major processes in the plant. For instance, to primary sedimentation, our headworks data, our dewatering of facilities' digester, central generation and our secondary treatment facilities. All of these will have distributed computer controls and monitoring functions at the site, although they will be received and operated back at the Control Center. ( led the fiber optics p �-y 'eceived from fvA-o� 2. Plant 2 will h / _ /i n o all the p 'iVIA✓L[gwVl Ui, ur existing c em which the m • e this work, the 1 � �J,a,�,Q Se-�"-C� system, and s S ns and sl w��j � A upon EMA's r; �P a supply of the s �v-�n-�'� ��.� ,, {�.�y _1 �,—°-- included in the sl 1 u ��� rece poor service ai 'i��ca.>,.,e.v� C,� � �eceived in May for — j �e o4s is t� ISO Technology, wl �d�" i bid of $5.15 mi Tonight you have protests that you' ll have to act on. These protests have been filed by some of the other equipment suppliers and Installers, and they are filing protests on the basis that they believe that the low bid contractor and its supplier, Allen-Bradley, did not fully comply with the plans and specifications. You will also hear from the designer, ERA, and from staff, that we believe that they can comply, and we have no reason to recommend to you any other action other than to award to the low bid. As we get Into this, the first actions on your agenda are to approve the addenda we sent out. Addendum No. 2 is one of the issues that you' ll be hearing about from the other manufacturers. Addendum 2 calls for a marriage between the installer and the supplier. The Issue there is we want to make sure that the equipment manufacturer have a direct hand in making sure that in furnishing and start-up and making sure that the software, which is the heart of the project, is compatible with the equipment and that the system will work. Allen-Bradley, the supplier, and our contractor, have given us letters saying that they can, in fact, comply 100% with the requirements of the addenda and the plans and specifications. Mr. Chairman, I would recommend that you receive and file the letters and approve the addenda, and then open the public hearing. ITEMS (17) (b,c,d,e,f &9) It was then moved and seconded to receive and file documents and letters received. The motion carried by unanimous ballot. Director Culver then asked when Addendum No. 2 sent to the bidders. Mr. Dawes responded the bids were received on the 20th or 21st of May. Addendum No. 2 went out about two weeks ahead of that. Joint Chairman Mahoney then opened the floor for public comments after setting down ground rules of 10 minutes per company. Six individuals. Two people from Sachs - total 10 minutes. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Sachs Electric Company - Richard Zuroweste, Regional Manager: Sachs Electric Company is a national electrical contractor with a sales volume in excess of $65,000,000 per year. Our sales market is focused basically on industrial customers such as the Orange County Sanitation Districts. Representing us here tonight are Nick Pregibon of Westinghouse and Heather Wells of Westinghouse, Craig Rossell of Hunt-Ortman of Pasadena and Mr. Sam Clarke of Sachs Electric who is sitting in the back. At this time I would like to turn over our presentation to our counsel , Mr. Craig Rossell. Craig Rossell : I don't know if it's possible to add to the agenda in ad hoc fashion a motion or motions to have the contract awarded to Sachs Electric and have the two lower bids set aside but if it's possible to bring that before the Boards tonight, we would like to do that. Sachs Electric is the lowest responsive bidder on this contract. I want to show you some language from some of the specifications which clearly demonstrate this. Because our time is 50 limited, it really does not permit any type of concrete or complete analysis of what we find happening here. But I'd like to begin by having you refer to Section 52.0370 of the specifications which provides, in part, that the contractor shall provide standard control systems. A standard control system is one which is available at time of bid with fully-tested, field-proven software and hardware, full documentation and prepared training classes such that no ... development must be done beyond system configuration and application software. And the part I have marked in green is "custom software and custom hardware will not be accepted". As was Just explained to you on May 7 of this year Addendum No. 2 to the bid invitation was sent out and I have excerpted a portion of the addendum to provide you with this language, "Add the following to Section 52.0370 standard control systems...The data concentrator manufacturer shall provide all operation and application software associated with the system described in these specifications•. In deference to what Mr. Dawes stated Just a moment ago, this language does not appear to simply give the manufacturer a hand in the creation of application and operation of software. It states that the data concentrator manufacturer shall provide all operation and specification software. The key elements of Sachs' system are displayed here. The four essential elements of the system are hardware, software, application software which, as we just read, is to be provided by the data concentrator manufacturer. That's part of the hardware. And operations maintenance. In Sachs' case each of these key elements of the system are provided by Westinghouse. As the specifications provide, Westinghouse is a prequalified data concentrator manufacturer with a proven record in the field of the standard system it wants to provide as part of this contract. I don't think that either of the two lower bidders can make a comparable claim, and such a claim is required as I read the specifications, as part of the bid package. I want to show you just briefly part of a letter that we, Sachs, received from Westinghouse in the middle of May. It gives you some idea about what Westinghouse is prepared to offer. I'm just going to read portions of what I have highlighted. 'All equipment and services will be our standard product offering." And then it goes on to state that certain training will be provided at the Riverside. California facility. °We will perform all engineering necessary in order to furnish, to supervise -2- installation and to place into operation all distributed control equipment as defined herein. We will assume responsibility for the functional operation of the system we provide." That's quite a contrast to the documentation you'll find In your package from Allen-Bradley. Sachs' system is $1.4 million below budget and yet it meets every specification in the bid invitation. One of the key elements of what the District requires is future expansion and modification. It's critical in our view that a manufacturer like Westinghouse provide this because when changes need to be made in the system in the future, you'll have one source of support, one source of responsibility; whereas, you'll see in a moment that responsibility is divided in at least one other case, the lowest bidder, in violation of the specifications. Let me show you what you get with HSQ's bid. You get hardware provided by Allen-Bradley, you get software provided by Allen-Bradley. But, contrary to what the specifications require, the application software is not provided by the data concentrator manufacturer. It is provided by HSQ, the contractor. Similarly for operations and maintenance there seems to be a combination of HSQ and/or Allen-Bradley, so that when the contractor has installed the system and the parts and the District is left with the equipment suppliers' responsibility for what happens next is going to be a combination of whatever Allen-Bradley or HSQ is prepared to provide at that point. With regard to JWP, this is the second lowest bid. But just one comment, although JWP provides all of the key elements of its system, it is not a pre-qualified data concentrator manufacturer. On that ground alone that bid is non-responsive. I'd like to speak for a moment about Public Contract Law in California. 1 believe the Districts are legally bound to award this contract to the lowest responsive bidder. I want to refer you briefly to a 1988 4th District case called Konica Business Systems vs. Regents of the University of California. In that case the court considered the application of Public Contract Law to a r, request for quotation which was prepared by the University for a charge-per-page contract for copying. The lowest bidder was a company called Copy Line. Copy Line was awarded the contract. There was an objection. There was a lawsuit filed and on appeal. The Court of Appeals found that certain items of equipment listed in Copy Line's bid were inferior to what was called out in the specifications. Specifically, Category 5 machine was supposed to provide you with at least 40 pages of copying per minute and other features; a Category 6 machine was to provide 55 pages of copying per minute and other features. In each case, Copy Line could not deliver. The court, on the other hand, found that Konica could either meet or exceed every specification in the bid package. In ruling for Konica the Court of Appeals rules the following. The University must award contracts for goods, materials and services to the lowest responsible bidder meeting specifications. Meeting specifications is italicized. The court goes on to state, "neither Copy Line nor the University directly dispute the fact that strict adherence to the specifications would have resulted in an increased bid for Copy Line. The sole claims are that Copy Line equipment is acceptable to the University in spite of its lack of capacity and specialized features and that Konica has not shown it would have made a lower bid if it had deviated from the specifications. Regardless of what Konica might have bid had it also deviated, the record is clear that Copy Line, by deviating from the specifications, obtained a competitive advantage by not meeting the minimum capabilities specified. We conclude the request for quotation can only be interpreted as setting minimum performance specifications for the copier with which bidders were required to strictly comply. To permit the University to allow deviation from precise specifications in its public call for bids leaves bidders in the unfair position of having to guess what will satisfy the .� University's needs. Bidders were entitled to expect bids which did not meet the specifications would be rejected in favor of those which did, or the contract would be rebid. -3- Finally, we conclude that the contract must be set aside since the deviations from the specifications gave Copy Line a competitive advantage and the RFQ did not clearly notify bidders they could bid on machines not meeting the listed specifications. Just one other item. One of the letters that has been received into evidence tonight is a June 6th, 1991 letter from Allen-Bradley to the District. Commenting there on certain issues which are the subject of our protest, Allen-Bradley refers to the addendum being held there to my right. And quoting the first sentence of that, Allen-Bradley states, °the data concentrator manufacturer shall provide all operation and application software associated with the system described in the specifications." Then, the following, "Allen-Bradley will work closely and cooperatively with the data concentrator supplier, HSQ Technology, to provide standard commercial software which meets the project requirements." There is a very clear indication that Allen-Bradley Is not providing that software. It is simply working with the contractor who is providing it. In talking this over, we have given thought to why the specifications were prepared and written in the way that they were, and we have concluded that they were written this way to ensure that when the contractor steps out because the system is in place, and the equipment suppliers step in for servicing and maintenance and modifications to an elaborate computer system, there will be one single source of support, one single source of responsibility. With HSQ, the lowest bidder, that source is either HSQ or Allen-Bradley and you don't know which. The sum of the letters that have been received in evidence have also commented on Sachs contention that HSQ's system is technically inferior to Sachs. Now, it sounds to me as though all is well with the District because HSQ has somewhat glibly stated that it takes no exceptions to the specifications. I urge the District to not take that quite so lightly. More time needs to be devoted to those issues. I think it will pay off in the long run if they are because the system that HSQ offers is going to provide certainly logistic problems, at the least, down the road. Chairman Mahoney: One more minute, Mr. Rossell , please. Craig Rossell : Let me just ask the Districts to consider their duty under applicable California law. There is a duty in public contracting to award the contract to the lowest responsive bidder. In this case the lowest responsive bidder is also responsible. Sachs Electric and Westinghouse provide a great team for this contract and we urge you to set aside the two lower bids and accept the bid of Sachs Electric. Thank you. Chairman Mahoney: The next speaker we have is Modicon, Inc. There are two gentlemen, I understand, who wish to speak on this matter, Joe Melton and Ken Jennings. Please come forward and give your presentation. You are limited to 10 minutes total between the two of you. Modicon, Inc. - Our presentation is very brief and without props but, I think, very dramatic. We believe that the specification has been written, unfortunately, with an unfair advantage to Allen-Bradley. AB was the only PLC vendor allowed to bid vs. 3 DCS vendors. It is quite a different technology and it provides an unfair economic advantage. It is evidenced by the fact that their bid was 26% less than the DCS bids, while the DCS bids were 1% apart. We believe that the open bidding process was forgone. PLCs were not allowed to bid when we asked about our eligibility to participate in the project. We were told that PLCs were not allowed, that DCS was the preferred technology. PLCs, however, now are being considered. The reason for our concerns are that we believe that we can save the Districts considerable sums of money, and we believe we can do that because we have a communications system that is 50 times faster than the one that is being considered right now, which can dramatically -4- reduce the number of data concentrators all together, if not maybe even eliminate them. So if you are looking at 10 redundant systems taken down to a very minimal amount, we are looking at well to excess of one-half million �.r dollars of savings to the Districts by doing that. That is not even to mention Installation costs, training costs, engineering costs and maintenance costs that further savings can be made. Again, along the lines of expandability and flexibility, your future is because we are using a standard, existing product line. Your future expandibility and flexibility is built in and your future maintenance and engineering costs, as well as training costs, because you have a considerable amount of existing hardware that we have already provided to the Districts. Overall , we are looking at, we believe, a savings, If you relook and do allow PLC vendors, we would like to get back into the system and we believe that we could save anywhere from one-half to one million dollars over the existing consideration. Chairman Mahoney: Thank you. The next speaker is Johnson Yokogawa Company, Mr. James Murphy. Johnson Yoko awa Cor oration - James Murphy: Thank you. I'm James Murphy with ohnson Yokogawa. We are a distributing control system manufacturer principally in the water and wastewater treatment market place. I don't have much to say tonight. I think Sachs Electric put it very well and pretty much our protest concurs with theirs. We believe that the HSQ/Allen-Bradley bid to you would be non-responsive. Our company has an affiliation with Allen-Bradley that is quite high up and it is our understanding that Allen-Bradley does not, is not, prepared to accept any responsibility for any of the software to be provided as was indicated by the quote on comnerically-available software. Also, there is the issue of if this was an acceptable bid, then perhaps some of the companies involved in the bidding process would have realigned themselves if they knew or that this type of alliance was acceptable. I think that we would have looked at the possibility with aligning ourselves with somebody such as an HSQ and supply only hardware for this project, had we known that would have been allowable. We believe that the specifications' intent was that it would not be allowable; that you wanted a single source of supply; that you wanted the person who supplied your system to be able to support it after it was installed and for the expansions that you have coming up. That is all I really have to say. I hope you' ll take that into consideration and deny this award to HSQ and Allen-Bradley. Thank you. Chairman Mahoney: Thank you, Mr. Murphy. The last speaker we have Is Kevin Renek and he is with Pacific Parts and Controls, Inc. Pacific Parts and Controls Inc. - Kevin Renek: One other thing that en-Ira ey antl ave said 1n their defense is the factual claim that they can meet any of the specifications. Basically, they are saying we don't have to prove it and our competition doesn't have any proof because they don't have any documentation and basically we can't get documentation from them so we can't prove that. In this one letter, June 7th from HSQ, in the back of that there is what seems to be a copy of documentation. It looks like a brochure type of thing from Allen-Bradley describing the HSQ Technology Miser Software. At the very end of the software, or at that thing, it says that Allen-Bradley is not responsible for any inadvertent errors and does not sell or support HSQ Technology software. So, basically, in their own documentation they are saying, and this is from a letter dated June 7, so I don't things have changed too far, they are saying that they do not support the software. As Sachs pointed out, it �.. was specifically stated that the software should be supplied by the data concentrator manufacturer and HSQ is not the data concentrator manufacturer. -5- They are the systems analyst, and the data concentrator manufacturer that we will work closely with and cooperatively with, but they haven't said we will support the software outright, and seeing how other software can be used on their hardware, I don't see how they could support everybody's software. They ... are basically a hardware manufacturer and, as generally is Modicon, but we also have software that we sell and support through a 24-hour 800 hotline. For that reason we agree with them that this doesn't meet the specifications and if they are going to be accepted, being a PLC manufacturer, we do believe the District can do much better with a more flexible system, a better performance system and, In addition, save money from Modicon or possibly another vendor, if they were allowed to bid or knew they were going to be accepted past these verbal Interpretations. Thank you. Chairman Mahoney: Thank you. Allright, I believe that concludes all of the parties that wish to address the Board on this item. We will now move on to consultant and staff responses to the comments we have just heard. Tom.... Tom Dawes: Mr. Chairman, the comments you heard from the other bidders starting with Sachs and their supplier, Westinghouse, which was the third bidder and Johnson which was the fourth bidder, we are prepared to respond to those inak s e �� detail . But, before we do that I just want to say that the basic i not how good Westinghouse is. Westinghouse was qualified to do this job and we take no exception to all of the things that they smut Westinghouse and how they could do the job. The issue is only "can the low bidder, Allen-Bradley, do the job?" Can Allen-Bradley supply the hardware and can Allen-Bradley supply the software in team with HSQ and do this job and meet the letter and the law of these plans and specifications as they were amended by the addendum. Now, and we believe the answer is yes, we believe there is really no way that we could say that they cannot meet them. What I would like to do now is to ask our designer, Joe Herti of EMA, (EMA is in Arizona and they have `..� prepared the plans and specifications and made the recommendations regarding this equipment) and I would like Mr. Herti to respond to you on these issues. Joe Herti EMA: Thank you, Tom. Basically, what we have been hearing tonight from est nghouse isn't anything different from what we have heard or seen in the letters submitted already. Our response to that was that we didn't see any reason why HSQ/AllenBradley could not supply the system as specified. They are not taking any exceptions, and I have not changed my mind due to anything I have heard here tonight. Relative to comments made by Modicon, this is something new that I haven't heard. However, I'd like to say at the time we did the bidding, PLCs were not the issue. It had to do with the system. At that time, Modicon did not have a system that met our requirements. Since then, they have developed their system. They have an excellent system now which could work well but at the time the specifications were put together, it did not exist. Director Sheridan: Excuse me, Mr. Chairman. I understand that this issue is highly technical in nature and since this issue is rather unusual that the Boards of Directors would have these types of issues, I wonder if itIm�i.g9ht b� e appropriate, and I 'm asking for your counsel , if we could have SIb�'+7hvi type of committee to help the Directors understand the technical issues and make a recommendation for those of us �(Z ggv Chairman Mahoney: Well , I think. I don't know that we really need to get Involved in the technicalities. I think what we are basically looking at is ... whether or not we have complied with the bid requirements and, in fact, bids were received and acted upon properly. The bidders did, in fact, fulfill the -6- requirements of the bid specifications. I think what we're hearing here is just a rebuttal to the facts that they are indicating that there is a difference in the technology. I'm not altogether as concerned about that myself, in that I think we have a contractor here that has said he will provide a product. The question is whether or not he provided his bid in accordance with the bid specifications. We're listening to that now. They are indicating that they did not and, in fact, they cannot. They are indicating that the bids, that the bid was not submitted in accordance with the specifications. I think what we're hearing here is rebuttal to that. I will reserve that question to later because I was going to ask counsel afterwards what are options are in dealing with this matter. And certainly once we hear from our consultant I would entertain that as a consideration but, if we could... Director Sheridan: My point is that we review ?? Chairman Mahoney: I understand that and certainly what we are here to do this evening is to listen to what we have. If we feel at that time, Director Sheridan, that we are not ready to do this, I totally agree with what your position is. Continue Mr. Herti. Joe Herti: Thank you. I really don't have much more to say other than that at this point my mind hasn't changed based on the letter that EMA has provided already to the Districts. We stilt believe that HSQ/Allen-Bradley can provide the system. Chairman Mahoney: Alright. Questions? Director ? : A wide variation in the bids seem to be that the low bidder's ?? and the other bidders ?? . Can you explain the disadvantages ?? . Obviously, the price is a great deal less and I ..� understand the programming part of it but is there any disadvantage to the dcs System? Mr. Herti : No disadvantage to the DCS system. All the bidders knew up front that Allen-Bradley was one of the qualified bidders on this project so it didn't come as a surprise or shock to any of them who have the PLCs. Director Catlin: Is there an issue on whether the contractor has to buy the equipment or can he use another contractor? Westinghouse seems to be saying that they can provide all of their subparts whereas Allen Bradley/HSQ can just subcontract pieces ?? Chairman Mahoney: I think we would have to defer that to legal counsel because I think you're getting into the legal area in this particular case, Buck. John Shaw: Yes. Our answer to that is that, In fact, the protestors are defining the word "provide" the way best benefits them. We do not see the word "provide" as designating that here Allen-Bradley must produce its awn kind of software. They would be left to their own means to present it to the District and, in fact, the District would go forward in an award-of-contract situation here, and legally require that the specs be met by way of contract provisions that would need to be entered into. Also, another key point on this again that was pointed out earlier is that Allen-Bradley was designated up front as one of the eligible bidders and the staff report indicates that the intent of the staff language in the bid specs, Including the addenda, was to make sure that in the end, this concentrator-manufacturer be responsible. So, I think it would be contradictory to say that on one hand we wanted Allen-Bradley as an eligible bidder and then to put out an addendum and pull them back. -7- Chairman Mahoney: Director Edgar. Director Edgar: One of the questions I think that with complex material like that, we have typically had pre-bidder conferences where people convene and ask questions to understand some of the issues. Was such a pre-bidder conference held? Joe Herti: Yes. We held a pre-bid conference, questions were generated and the answers to those questions and the questions were issued with Addendum No. 2. Director Edgar: So basically what you are saying is that there was a pre-bidder conference, everybody who showed for the bids came to the conference and had an opportunity to ask any questions that they chose to and presumably they had a full understanding of the options before they left. Director Collins: I appreciate the legal counsel 's legal opinion. From a standpoint of application of the bid process, and as you've seen it over the years, and you've obviously experienced it personally, is it reasonable to assume that the language in the bid was misleading? Can it be reasonably construed to be misleading because that is the contention that I hear--that, gee, if we had only known and that language hadn't said that, yeah, maybe ? is qualified because of ? Joe Herti: That question was raised I believe in the pre-bid conference. We could refer to the minut from that, but I believe that question was specifically ( whether Qr n yez ri-c4l *e. a� via ti u 1 ..z. 4bw �f, Director Colli Which i t e implementation of the a, X0q r 4 ns: misconception t-so Is hat correct � �. � 7 Joe Herti: Yes Director Collins: I have one question for legal counsel , if I could, and you could respond to it. Do we have a surety and performance bond for this? John Shaw: Yes, we do. Director Norman Culver: Mr. Chairman, is this a ,point venture between HSQ and Allen-Bradley? John Shaw: No, it is not. Our contract will be with HSQ and then HSQ, in turn, will have a subcontract with Allen-Bradley. Director Culver: I 'm a little bit disturbed, the last gentleman who spoke read the letter and I couldn't find it. Something that Allen-Bradley said they couldn't complete the ? or something to ?? . They wouldn't be responsible. Alright, Mr. Chairman, r got it here, it says that Allen-Bradley was not responsible for any inadvertent errors ?? for HSQ Technology software. What does that mean, Mr. Shaw? John Shaw: You're reading from what document? Director Culver: This letter is sent out by Allen-Bradley on the Director t : Could we have HSQ and Allen-Bradley respond to that? v Chairman Mahoney: Let me give legal counsel a moment. Yes, let's have them speak to it. -B- Tom Dawes: Jim McLellan from HSQ is here. Jim, why don't you come up and respond to that question, and someone from Allen-Bradley. Director Robert Main: Mr. Chairman, I 'm getting more buried in technical things. I have a computer of my own and know where the on and off switch is. But this is way beyond me. I think that the speaker over here, Director Sheridan, I like what she had to say about having somebody study this because my feeling is I 'm not going to grasp it, especially when I read what this says. I understand when they say they are not responsible. Chairman Mahoney: Okay, fine. Frank. Director Frank Laszlo: This sounds like it could be potential litigatMIA—'Ind o My experience is ? hould we throw ey�rybody out and ask for ? In d and so I wan t�to r ise t ueq stion �tcn�t. (iJ-(- Gann John Shaw: We haven't had any threats of litigation per se. I don't think 74 closed session would be appropriate at this point. In the staff report we do point out that after considering all the information, you have one option available which is, in fact, to reject all bids. Director Evans: The speaker who came up and said he was not permitted to bid on this ? but had improved technology and equipment that would do the same jab and possibly even save the Districts somewhere between one half and one million dollars, I think we ought to go back to the drawing board with this and see if tyhat is true and let's have some ? bids ? Director Stanton: Mr. Chairman, if this bid process is without fault. If it is done according to ? in the professional manner that our staff has always shown in the past, then I would say to reject anything at this point or to backtrack at this point is to say that this is flawed. I don't believe it was. I think it was ?? and I don't know if ?? but I certainly would be willing to accept the bid sheet and go ahead and award the contract to the low bidder. Seconded by one of the Directors. Chairman Mahoney: Alright. We have a motion and a second before us. John Shaw: I 've had an opportunity to look at this document and I think it is appropriate that Allen-Bradley be given the chance to speak to this, but this document that you read from is a standard form they had in 1990 as an attachment. Again, talking about the bid package submitted to the District, there is nothing on the face of the bid package, of which this not a part, indicating deviation from our requirements and, secondly, again, when we go to execute the contracts, guarantees would be required from HSQ and Allen-Bradley as to the responsibility of the software. Would you want to add anything to that? Chairman Mahoney: We' ll allow you a couple of minutes to address it. We have a motion and a second. We will hold....yes, Mr. Culver. Director Culver: Can I call the question? I don't know why Roger wants to railroad this thing but I think ? has a very good idea to hold ? We have subcommittees on other things that weren't quite clear. It would only take maybe a couple of meetings with a subcommittee of people that understand -.- this ?? and design, ? Mr. Edgar. With these people who understand ?? I'm not saying that these people's equipment is better than the one we' re thinking about putting in but we don't know at this Point. I think we need to have a subcommittee to look at it. -9- Chairman Mahoney: Thank you. What I 'm going to do right now is let these two gentlemen speak briefly to address this issue and then we' ll take up what action we are going to take. HS Technolo - James McMillan: My name is James McMillan. I am with HSQ echno ogy. The gentleman on my left is Lou Cline with Allen-Bradley Company. First of all , let me state that that cut sheet that the gentleman was referring to is a standard catalog data sheet and was published some time ago. It was attached to my letter to the Board and it was attached strictly as an illustration that, in fact, HSQ and Allen-Bradley have worked together in the past and have a cooperative arrangement. Allen-Bradley does not sell off-the-shelf HSQ software. That's true. And in that sense that comment was taken completely out of context. The other thing that was completely taken out of context was the quote from Allen-Bradley's letter where a rather vague reference was made to standing behind or supporting HSQ and working closely with. That was taken out of context. If the entire letter had been read, it would have been an unequivicable statement by Allen-Bradley that they stand by and will support, will check and review our designs and guarantee the software and will be there through the duration of the contract. Lou, do you have anything to add to that? Lou Cline: No. I would just like to clear up a couple other things that I think were taken out of context. I have heard on at least one occasion that Allen-Bradley is only a hardware supplier. My title with Allen-Bradley is the Manager of the Program Management Group. I have profit-and-loss responsibility for the systems business that we do within the government arena. As part of that we have got a number of fine engineering organizations. We routinely take on systems projects. At times we do the work ourselves, and others we subcontract. We are more than just an equipment supplier. We are a systems supplier. What we endeavored to do on your requirements here was work with HSQ to develop a system solution. We have done that. We have developed a solution which meets all of the specifications which we, the Allen-Bradley Company, stand behind and assume responsibility for, and we will certify that. So we feel we are 100% compliant. James McMillan: One more comment, please? At this present time the Allen-Bradley Company and HSQ are also jointly putting together a system for the City of Greenbay wastewater treatment plant with similar architecture using similar hardware and software. Chairman Mahoney: Thank you. Buck, you had a question? Director Catlin: I'm going to speak in favor of Roger's motion for the following reasons. ? at the Executive Board and I have never seen a more complicated set of plans and state of the art. Now, I myself am an electrical engineer in computer technology but it is extremely difficult for me to follow this. That is why we hired professionals to evaluate it. I would say that ?? that is where we should address it, but as far as I'm concerned I think we should proceed. Chairman Mahoney: Alright, thank you. We have called for the question. We will take a...how should we do this? I guess we will take a voice vote. All in favor signify by saying aye. (Ayes) Opposed? (Nays). Alright, it sounds like the motion carries to award the contract, or to basically deny the opposition and to award the contract. ... We are also going to have to pass Item (k) which is a rejection of a bid of JWP Controls as being non-responsive. It was then moved, seconded and carried with no opposition. -10- Chairman Mahoney: By majority on the prior. On (1) we made a majority vote, correct. I'm advised that we are going to have to move Resolution No. 91-126 awarding Job Nos. J-23-2 and P2-44. I will need a motion and a second. (So moved and seconded). I will ask for...is there any opposition? Alright, all in favor signify by saying aye. (Ayes) Opposed? (Nays) Motion carries by unanimous consent, excuse me, by majority vote. I 'm sorry. I have that all the time. The teeth, you knowl -11- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FAX TRANSMITTAL FORM TO: LwI 41*- ` DATE: 8 O(o q TIME: Organization: FAX No.: ( ) Total number�of pages being transmitted (including this transmittal form): SUBJECT: 11 1 -yV u PRIORITY: Urgent UT01PPer Your RequestO FYIQoCther� '1-Wi+ ..r. _ ^ 4" SPECIAL NOTES: 1� Ow FROM: � Ext :_�S Transmitting Operator. Ext NOTE: If you encounter any difficulty in receiving the total number of pages indicated above, PLEASE CALL BACK AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AT(714)962.2411 AND ASK FOR THE TRANSMITTING OPERATOR. F P.O.Box 8127 aL Fountain Valley,California 92728-8127 CSDOC FAX No.: (714)962-0356 cicphtrne:(714)962-2411 JULY 17 1991 ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING /17(a) Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering reported that in March 1991 the Directors approved plans and specifications for two computerized treatment plant monitoring and control system projects, Job No. J-23-2, which will install a new system in the control center building currently under construction at Plant No. 1; and Job No. P2-44, which will replace an existing computerized monitoring system at Plant No. 2. Mr. Dawes advised that five manufacturers were prequalified to supply the equipment for these jobs by the Boards in August 1990. He noted that these systems will provide the Operations staff better access to information concerning the operation of the plants, produce historical data and have the ability to control all process equipment from the Operations Centers at both facilities. He further reported that the project at Plant No. 1 will install the ... necessary hardware, software and data highway to order to monitor process functions for both existing and future master-planned facilities. Ultimately, the system will have the ability to provide distributed control for all plant functions from the Control Center/Operations and Maintenance Building, Job No. J-23-1, which is currently under construction. The project at Plant No 2 will replace the existing computer monitoring system, which is of mid-1970's technology, with an identical system proposed for Plant No. 1 facilities. The existing computer hardware is obsolete and trained service personnel are unavailable. -1- Mr. Dawes advised that four bids were received in May for this work (which was bid as a single contract), ranging from $3.75 million to $5.15 million. The Districts have received protests from some of the bidders and equipment suppliers relative to award to the apparent first and second low bidders on the basis that their bids do not fully comply with the plans and specifications. Staff agreed that the bid of JWP, the second low bidder, was non-responsive and recommended that this bid be rejected. The designer, EMA, Inc. , and staff believe that the HSQ/Allen-Bradley bid does comply, and that there is no reason to recommend any other action other than to award to the low bidder. Mr. Dawes stated that Addendum No. 2 is one of the issues that the Board will be hearing about from the other manufacturers. Addendum No. 2 calls for a marriage between the installer and the supplier. The issue there is to ensure that the equipment manufacturer has a direct hand in furnishing and start-up and to make sure �..� that the software, which is the heart of the project, is compatible with the equipment and that the system will work. The protesters are contending that the low bidders cannot meet the requirements of Addendum No. 2. Mr. Dawes advised that HSQ Technology, the first low bidder, which is supplying approved Allen-Bradley equipment, has stated in various letters that they can, in fact, comply 100% with the requirements of the specifications and addenda. Allen-Bradley has also assured the Districts in writing of their ability to comply with the specifications. The Director of Engineering recommended that the Boards approve the addenda, receive and file the Staff Report and various letters received in connection with the -2- bid provided for the hardware, software, application software and operations maintenance to be provided by Westinghouse. With regard to the bid of HSQ, he further asserted his belief that Allen-Bradley would provide the hardware and software but that they would not be providing the application software. Mr. Rossell then asserted that the award of Job Nos. J-23-2 and P2-44 should not be made to HSQ based on the findings of a 1988 4th District Case, Konica Business Systems vs. Regents of the University of California, which he, in summary, claimed a similar situation set aside a contract for copying services because the low bidder deviated from the specifications resulting In a competitive advantage. Mr. Rossell also questioned wording in a June 6, 1991 letter submitted by Allen-Bradley which, he asserted, seemed to indicate that they would not be providing the software, but, rather, would only be working with the contractor (HSQ) to provide it; which he further asserted was contrary to the specifications. He reiterated his request that the Boards set aside the first and second low bids and award the contract to Sachs Electric. Modicon, Inc. Joe Melton and Ken Jennings representing Modicon, Inc. (an equipment supplier that was not prequalified) then addressed the Boards. Mr. Melton asserted that the specifications were written with an unfair advantage to Allen-Bradley. He further asserted that Allen-Bradley was the only PLC vendor that was prequalified to bid versus three DCS vendors, and that they were quite different technologies and, therefore, provided an unfair economic advantage to Allen-Bradley. -4- protest and award of this project, and open the floor for oral public comments. `/ p17(b) ,(c) ,(d) ,(e) ,(f) & (g) - STANDARD ITEMS TO RECEIVE & FILE & APPROVE ADDENDA M17(h) Oral comments Sachs Electric The Chairman recognized Mr. Richard Zuroweste, Regional Manager for Sachs Electric (the third low bidder), who had submitted a written protest. He stated that his company was a national electrical contractor and that their market is focused on industrial customers. Mr. Zuroweste advised that Nick Pregibon and Heather Wells, both representing Westinghouse (a prequalified equipment supplier) , were present that evening. He then introduced Mr. Craig Rossell , counsel for Sachs Electric. Mr. Rossell addressed the Boards and suggested that they add to their agenda a motion to set aside the apparent first and second low bidders as being non-responsive and award the contract for Jobs Nos. J-23-2 and P244 to Sachs Electric. He stated his belief that Sachs Electric was the lowest responsive bidder. He asserted that the specifications called for standard control systems and that the data concentrator manufacturer shall provide all operation and application software associated with the system described in the specifications. He also asserted that the bid submitted by HSQ did not comply with these specifications. Mr. Rossell noted Sachs Electric-s -3- They also asserted that their system was much faster than the one being considered and alleged that they could save the Districts a considerable amount of money. Johnson Yokogawa Corporation Mr. James Murphy, representing Johnson Yokogawa Corporation (a prequalified equipment supplier and the fourth low bidder) , stated that his firm was a distributing control system manufacturer, principally in the water and wastewater treatment market place. Johnson Yokogama had submitted a written protest. He concurred with Sachs Electric's assertion that the HSQ/Allen-Bradley bid was non-responsive. He expressed his belief that Allen Bradley would not accept responsibility for the software. He further commented that it was his belief that the Districts wanted a single source of supply and that the supplier must be able to support the system for future expansion, and asserted that HSQ would not meet those qualifications. Mr. Murphy urged the Boards to deny the award to HSQ/Allen-Bradley. Pacific Parts and Controls, Inc. Mr. Kevin Renek, representing Pacific Parts and Controls, Inc. (neither a bidder nor a prequalified equipment supplier who had submitted a written protest) , then addressed the Boards. He reiterated what Sachs Electric had asserted that the software should be supplied by the data concentrator manufacturer. It was his contention that HSQ is not the data concentrator manufacturer, and alleged that Allen-Bradley had disclaimed support of the software system. Mr. Renek noted that his firm both sold the software and would support it. He asserted that the Districts could get a better and -5- more flexible system and save money if they chose a system such as Modicon or others offered. #17(1) Consultant and Staff response to comments The Director of Engineering pointed out to Directors that the issue was not how good Sachs, Westinghouse or other unsuccessful bidders were, but whether the low bidder, HSQ/Allen-Bradley, could meet the specifications and perform the work. He noted that Westinghouse was prequalified and staff did not dispute whether they could provide the equipment and service. Mr. Dawes stated that the staff and consultant believe that Allen-Bradley can, in fact, supply the hardware and the software in team with HSQ and meet the specifications, as amended by Addendum No. 2, and that no information had been presented to demonstrate that they cannot meet them. �✓ The Chair then recognized Mr. Joe Herti , of EMA, Inc. , the Districts' consultant who prepared the plans and specifications for these projects. Mr. Herti stated that he had not seen or heard anything different that evening that changed his mind with regard to HSQ's ability to meet the specifications. He noted that HSQ and Allen-Bradley have not taken any exceptions to the specifications. With regard to comments made by Modicon, Mr. Herti acknowledged that at the specifications were prepared, PLCs were not the issue. Modicon did not have a system that would meet the Districts' requirements at that time. Since then, however, they have developed a system that would work well , but it did -6- not exist when the other suppliers were prequalified. Mr. Herti reiterated that he and the Districts' staff believe that HSQ/Allen-Bradley can provide the system specified. #17(j) Denying request of protesters to declare the apparent low bid of HSQ Technology non-responsive and to reject said bid Directors entered into a lengthy discussion relative to the protests of Sachs Electric, Modicon, Johnson Yokogawa Corporation, Westinghouse Electric Corporation and Pacific Parts and Controls, Inc. relative to award of Job Nos. J-23-2 and P2-44 to either the first or second apparent low bidders on the basis that their bids did not meet the specifications. They considered referring the matter to a special committee of Directors for further study. `..,d However, it was pointed out that because the systems were very complicated and highly technical , the Boards had initially realized the need for an outside consultant on this matter and had employed EMA, Inc. to prepare the specifications. EMA has also reviewed all of the material submitted by the protesters and has submitted their recommendation to award to the apparent low bidder, HSQ Technology. Directors commented that it would be very difficult even for those who were engineers to understand and address these issues, and the Board should focus their attention on whether the bid requirements and process were properly followed. Directors questioned the advantages and disadvantages of the two types of computer systems. Districts' consultant, Mr. Herti , stated his belief that -7- there was no advantage to the DSC system. He pointed out that there was a pre-bid conference held for all bidders where they were given an opportunity to ask questions and clarify the technical specifications. Accordingly, all bidders knew that Allen-Bradley was one of the prequalified bidders. The Assistant General Counsel commented that the protesters had defined the word "provide" in the specifications as best benefited them. He reiterated that Allen-Bradley had been designated up front as one of the eligible bidders. He agreed that it was the Districts' intent that the concentrator-manufacturer be responsible for the software. Allen-Bradley has assured the Districts that they assume full responsibility for their system. Mr. Shaw added that written guarantees would be required from HSQ and Allen-Bradley at the time the contract is executed. In response to inquiries from Directors relative to whether this was a ,point venture between HSQ and Allen-Bradley and whether surety and performance bonds are required on this contract, Mr. Shaw responded that the Districts' contract would be with HSQ. HSQ would then have a subcontract with Allen- Bradley. He also advised that surety and performance bonds were required. Directors further discussed their options, including rebidding the project and the potential additional cost or cost savings associated with each alternative. It was pointed out by Directors that if the low bidder submitted its bid in accordance with the proper bidding procedures, states that the specifications will be met and the staff and consultant agree that he can meet the specifications, there was no reason to reject the bid and backtrack at this point. -8- It was then moved and seconded that the requests of Sachs Electric, Johnson Yokogawa Corporation, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Pacific Parts and Controls, Inc. and Modicon, Inc., to reject the apparent low bid of HSQ Technology on the basis that their bid did not meet the specifications, be denied. During further discussion by Directors, Mr. James McMillan, representing HSQ Technology, and Mr. Lou Cline, representing Allen-Bradley, responded to the assertions by the protesters that Allen-Bradley would not support their software. They pointed out that the statement mentioned earlier--that Allen-Bradley does not sell or support HSQ Technology software--was taken from a standard catalog sheet that was published some time ago. It was attached to the letter of HSQ Technology only to show that they had worked together 1n the past. He stated that it is true that Allen-Bradley does not sell off-the-shelf HSQ Technology but that statement was taken completely out of context when mentioned previously. He pointed out another statement taken out of context was the quote from Allen-Bradley's letter regarding standing behind or supporting HSQ. Mr. McMillan stressed that if the entire letter had been read, it unequlvacabiy states that Allen-Bradley stands behind and will support and guarantee the software and will be there through the duration of the contract. Mr. Cline, Manager of the Program Management Group of Allen-Bradley, refuted the comments that they are only a hardware supplier. He added that he is responsible for the systems business they do within the government arena. He advised that Allen-Bradley routinely takes on systems projects. Sometimes they do the work themselves and sometimes they subcontract the -9- • work. He firmly stated that they were more than just a equipment supplier; they are a systems supplier. Mr. Cline advised that what they endeavored to do with regard to the Districts' requirements was to work with HSQ to L� develop a systems solution which meets all of the specifications. On behalf of Allen-Bradley, he certified that they will assume responsibility for this system and are 100% compliant with the specifications. Following a call for the question, the following motion was duly carried by voice vote: That the Boards of Directors do hereby deny the requests of Sachs Electric, Johnson Yokogawa Corporation, Westinghouse Electric Corporation. Pacific Parts and Controls, Inc. and Modicon, Inc. to reject the low bid of HSQ Technology on the basis that it does not meet the specifications. #17(k) Declaring the bid of JWP Controls �✓ as non-responsive and rejecting said bid Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the bid of JWP Controls is hereby declared as non-responsive; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said bid be, and is hereby, rejected. #17(1) Declaring bid of HSQ Technology responsive to specifications and -10- awarding Job Nos. J-23-2 & P2-44 to HSQ Technology Lr Moved, seconded and duly carried by voice vote: That the bid of HSQ Technology be, and is hereby, declared as responsive to the specifications; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 91-126, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Plant No. 1 Control Center Instrumentation, Job No. J-23-2, and Replacement of Computerized Monitoring System ast Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-44, HSQ Technology in the total amount of $3,752,000.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -11- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 39 5, 69 79 119 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING ON JULY 17, 1991 PHj'ATfON .... 2-49 \,WIA.. oe FIST J e ( C V y e N Sion. 195 OggNGE COON ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL An adjourned regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held om July 17, 1991, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts- Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a �k quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: a Dan Griset, Chai man _Robert Richardson x Charles E. Puckett, Chairman pro tem _Richard B. Edgar =Fred Barrera _Gene Beyer =Roger Stanton Don R. Roth =James A. Wahner _James Ferryman DISTRICT NO. 2: a Iry Pickier, Chairman _Fred Hunter =John Collins, Chairman pro tan _George Scott =Fretl Barrera _Gene Beyer =Bob Bell Barry Denes _ =A.B. -Buck- Catlin _Chris Norby =William D. Mahoney _James H. Flora =Robert H. Main _Not man Culver =Carrey J. Nelson _Glenn Parker =Arthur G. Newton _Carol Downey 7--Miguel Pulido _Dan Griset x Mark Schwing John M. Gullixson =Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 3: x Sal A. Sapien, Chairman _Harry M. Dotson =Peter Green, Chairman pro tem _Earle Robitaille _ x Walter K. Bowman Cecilia L. Age_ - =A.B. -Buck- Catlin ' _Chris Herby =John Collins _George Scott man Culver Robert H. Main =Burnie Dunlap —_Carrey J. Nelson =James V. Evans _Margie L. Rice x James H. Flora William D. Mahoney x Don R. Griffin —_Rhonda J. McCune =Frank Laszlo Edna Wilson =Pat McGuigan —Robert Richardson x Keith A. Nelson _Eva G. Miner a Iry Pickier Fred Hunter xRoger Stanton _Don R. Roth _Charles Sylvia _Alice Jempsa DISTRICT NO. 5: x Phil Sansone, Chai man John C. Cox, Jr. =Don R. Roth, Chairman pro tan _Roger Stanton . =Evelyn Hart _Ruthelyn Plummer DISTRICT NO. 6: x James A. Wahner, Chai man Dick Sherrick x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman pro tan —Evelyn Hart _Don R. Roth =Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 7: x Richard B. Edgar, Chai man Charles E. Puckett =James A. Wanner, Chai man pro in —Nate Reade =Fred Barrera —Gene Beyer x Jahn C. Cox, Jr. —Ruthelyn Plummer a Robert Richardson —Miguel Pulido Don R. Roth xRoger Stanton =Sally Anne Sheridan =Barry Hammond DISTRICT NO. 11: x Grace Winchell, Chai man Linda Moulton-Patterson x Jack Kelly, Chaiman pro tom —Jim Silva =Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth a ` DISTRICT NO. 13: x William 0. Ehrle, Chairman Fred Hunter =Fred Barrera, Chai man pro tan —Gene Beyer =John M. Gullixson - —_Mark Schwing =Glenn Parker Burnie Dunlap _Don R. Roth x Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chairman Darryl Miller x Sally Anne Sheridan, Chairman pro tam —Barry Hammond =Fretl Barrera —Gene Beyer =Leslie A. Pontious —Richard B. Edgar —Don R. R6th xRoger Stanton -2 07/17/91 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Mayne Sylvester, General Manager, , - Rita J. Brown, Board Secretary, Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Corinne Clawson, Patti Gorczyka, Gary Hasenstab, Ed Hodges, Penny Kyle, John Linder, Charles Nichols, Bob Ooten, Adriana Renescu, Jack Vincent, Chuck Winsor, Jim Harris, Mark Esquer OTHERS PRESENT: John R. Shaw, Assistant General Counsel , Bill Knopf, Mary Lee, Phil Stone, Bill Clarke, Kevin Renek, James Murphy, Ken Jennings, Joe Melton, Craig Rossell , Richard Zuroweste, Jerry A. King DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file minute excerpt re Board Appointment That the minute excerpt from the City of Seal Beach re election of mayor and appointment of alternate Director, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows: (*Mayor) District Active Director Alternate Director 3 Frank Laszlo* Edna Wilson DISTRICTS 1 7 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and fi e8 m mute excer t re Board Appointment That the minute excerpt from the City of Tustin re election of mayor and appointment of alternate Directors, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows: (*Mayor) District Active Director Alternate Director 1 Charles Puckett* Richard Edgar 7 Richard Edgar Charles Puckett* 14 Leslie Pontious Richard Edgar ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Catlin recognized Bob Presentation of service_ p ns to ODten for 10 years of outstanding District-employees Bob Uoten and service to the Districts. Bob heads d Hodges up the Districts' Operations Division and is responsible for operating the plants around the clock. He noted that the Operations Division is also responsible for complying with the Districts' NPDES Permit. He then presented Bob with a 10-year service pin. The Joint Chai man also recognized Ed Hodges for the excellent job he has e been doing for the Districts for the last 5 years. Ed heads up the Districts' Maintenance Division that keeps the E1 billion worth of sewerage facilities running. This includes two treatment plants, over 850 miles of large trunk sewers and 30 pumping stations. Chai man Catlin then presented Ed with a 5-year service pin. -3- 07/17/91 ALL DISTRICTS Outgoing Joint Chairman Catlin Report of the Joint Chairman conveyed his thanks to Directors for their support during his term and briefly reviewed the Districts' major accomplishments during the 1990-91 fiscal year, which were summarized to his memorandum to the Directors Included in their meeting folders. Chairman Catlin then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, July 24th, at 5:30 p.m. , and invited Directors Fred Barrera and Bob Bell to attend and participate in the discussions. The Joint Chairman also announced that the Building Committee was scheduled to meet on Thursday, July 25th, at 5:30 p.m. He added that the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee was scheduled to meet on Thursday, August 1st, at 5:30 p.m. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that the Report of the General Manager Districts' Treatment Plants 1 and 2 had received the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies' "Gold Award" for 1990. The award states, "In recognition of its complete and consistent National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit compliance during the calendar year 1990." He added that staff members Bob Oaten and Ed Hodges, recognized earlier by the Joint Chairman for their service, played a major role in the Districts' ability to achieve this award. Mr. Sylvester also reported that the Orange County Fair had opened that day and as part of the Districts' public outreach program, a booth had been set up at the fair. We are sharing space with the Municipal Water District of Orange County and the Mesa Consolidated Water District. The General Manager called the Directors' attention to a new abbreviated brochure on the Districts' 112020 Vision" Action Plan, titled "Planning with Vision", included in their folders which was also being handed out at the fair. He further reported that a new video on the Districts' wastewater management program had just been completed the previous day and was being played continuously at the fair. The 20-minute video was then presented for the Directors. Mr. Sylvester advised that the video would be made available for any of the Directors or their staffs to borrow, or the Districts' staff would be happy to make a presentation to community service groups. ALL DISTRICTS This being the annual meeting fixed by Annual Election of Joint ha rman the Boards of Directors for the election of the Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization, the Secretary stated that William D. Mahoney had been nominated at the regular meeting of the Joint Boards on June 12, 1991, in accordance with established procedures. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director William D. Mahoney as Joint Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. -4- 07/17/91 ALL DISTRICTS This being the annual meeting fixed by Annual Election of Vice Joint the Boards of Directors for the Chairman election of the Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization, nominations were then called for the post of Vice Joint Chairman, whereupon Evelyn Hart was nominated. There being no other nominations, the vote was then polled, and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Evelyn Hart as Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. Vice Joint Chairman Hart then thanked the Directors for electing her to the post. DISTRICT 5 The Joint Chairman announced that the Election of Chairman and Chairman office of Chairman of County pro tem Sanitation District No. 5 had been vacated by the election of Director Evelyn Hart to the post of Vice Joint Chairman and that election of a new Chairman would, therefore, be in order. Director Phil Sansone was then duly nominated and elected Chairman of District No. 5. Joint Chairman Mahoney then reported that the election of Director Sansone as Chairman of District No. 5 created a vacancy in the post of Chairman pro tem and declared nominations in order to fill the vacant position. t� Director Don R. Roth was then duly nominated and elected Chairman pro tem of District No. 5. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 12, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 12, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 12, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the , regular meeting held June 12, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 12, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -5- 07/17/91 DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 12, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 12, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 12, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or Approval of minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 12, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of Dayme nt of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 6/05/91 6/19/91 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 541,500.44 $ 625,594.93 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 522,264.39 4,788,020.43 Joint Working Capital Fund - 180,430.37 154,910.52 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 113,126.96 8,336.26 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 7,917.12 259.83 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 1,798,115.79 6,566.32 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 37,170.51 26,488.34 DISTRICT - 8,954.92 5,269.54 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 5,842.49 200.77 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 66,872.12 17,852.97 DIDI TRI�1 - 8,770.48 9,743.20 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 290.49 47.87 DISTRICT­N0. 14 - 1,201,226.07 630.37 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 8 6 JOINT - 1,732.67 45.61 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 8 7 JOINT - 3,981.10 -0- DISTRICT NOS. 7 8 14 OINT - 3,907.67 6,850.00 4,502'103.5 5,650,816.96 -6- 07/17/91 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing and directing execution and filing of documents necessary That the following resolutions for Federal and State Grants for authorizing and directing execution the 1991-92 Joint Works Improve- and filing of documents necessary for ments and Additions Federal and State Clean Water Grants and Loans under 33 U.S.C. , 1251 et seq. ; Chapters 12.5, 13, 14 and 15; and Division 7 of the California Water Code, and providing certain assurances in connection with the 1991-92 Joint Works Improvements and Additions, be, and are hereby, adopted by the respective Boards of Directors: District No. Resolution No. 1 91-92-1 2 91-93-2 3 91-94-3 5 91-95-5 6 91-96-6 7 91-97-7 11 91-98-11 13 91-99-13 14 91-100-14 Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizin staff to issue a purchase order to outh Coast Air That staff be, and is hereby, Quality Management Dis ri ct for authorized to issue a purchase order payment of various fees during to South Coast Air Quality Management fiscal year 1991-92 District in an amount not to exceed $318,000.00 for payment of various fees required by SCAQMD regulations, payable during fiscal year 1991-92, estimated as follows: Type of Fee Amount Annual Emissions $95,000 Annual Operating Permit and Permit Evaluation 75,000 Nonattainment Pollutants, Precursors and Toxics 25,000 Source Test Analysis 63,000 Miscellaneous 60,000 TOTAL $318,000 -7- 07/17/91 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to 5ea-Bird That staff be, and is hereby, El ectronicsl Inc. for purchase of a authorized to issue a purchase order ' SBE-9 CTD with PAR Sensor and to Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc. in the Fluorometer Specification amount of $54,440.00 plus tax and No. -201 freight, for Purchase of a SBE-9 CID with PAR Sensor and Fluorometer (Specification No. E-201) to be used for sampling and analyses of ocean waters at Districts' offshore stations. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Professional 5ervlces Agreement with Boyle Engineering That the Selection Committee Corporation for preparation of certification of the final negotiated wastewater Quality, Diversion and fee relative to the Professional Treatment Study Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for preparation of wastewater Quality, Diversion and Treatment Study, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 91-101, approving said agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $88,055.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services em A reent That the Selection Committee with Bo le En ineerin or oration certification of the final negotiated for design of entral Laboratory, fee relative to Addendum No. 4 to the Job No. J-17 Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17, providing for additional Resident Project Engineer services, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 91-102, approving Addendum No. 4 to said agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for said additional services, on a full-time basis through the end of the construction phase, at the rate of $80.00 per hour, including labor, overhead and profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $51,200.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $641,703.00 to an amount not to exceed $692,903.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 2 to the • Professi�ervices A reement That the Selection Committee with The Project So utions Company certification of the final negotiated for specia ized engineering and fee relative to Addendum No. 2 to the construction inspection services Professional Services Agreement with The Project Solutions Company for specialized engineering and construction inspection services re instrumentation/process control systems included in various master-planned construction projects, providing for an extension of the term of said agreement and revision of the hourly-rate fee schedule, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, -8- 07/17/91 FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution - No. 91-103, approving Addendum No. 2 to said agreement with The Project Solutions Company for said services, providing for an extension of said agreement for up to three years, on an as-needed basis, from September 1, 1991 to August 31, 1994, and increasing the hourly rates as follows, plus direct expenses at cost for out-of-town travel : Agreement Period Hourly Rate 9/01/91 - 8/31192 $ 59.00 9/01/92 - 8/31/93 62.00 9/01/93 - 8/31/94 65.00 Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizin staff to award urchase order contracts relative to oils That the Selection Committee Concrete and Other Materials certification of the final negotiated Testin Services for Various fees with the following firms Collection stem and Treatment relative to Soils, Concrete and Other Plant Projects, Specification Materials Testing Services for No. - 55 Various Collection System and Treatment Plant Projects, Specification No. 5-055, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to award purchase order contracts to the following firms for said testing services for the period July 18, 1991 through July 17, 1992, with provision for two one-year extensions: Type and Location Annual Amount Firm of Work Not to Exceed Converse Soils, Concrete/ $ 50,000.00 Consultants Collection System Professional Soils, Concrete/ 50,000.00 Services Collection System Industries, Inc. Twining Labs Full Service/Plants 100,000.00 of Southern and Collection California System Smith-Emery Full Service/Plants 160,000.00 Company -9- 07/17/91 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving execution and delivery Of the First Supplemental Trust That the Boards of Directors hereby Agreement to the Ca ital IT prove- adopt the following resolutions Tent Program 1990-92 Series A 100 approving the execution and delivery million Certificates of of the First Supplemental Trust Participation Agreement to the Capital Improvement Program 1990-92 Series A $100 million Certificates of Participation in order to provide that the record date for the certificates in the daily mode be changed to the last day of the month: District Resolution No. 1 91-104-1 2 91-105-2 3 91-106-3 5 91-107-5 6 91-108-6 7 91-109-7 11 91-110-11 13 91-111-13 14 91-112-14 Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. `✓ ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the General Manager to employ a Safety and Health Manager That the General Manager be, and is at a salary above the mid-point of hereby, authorized to employ Safety the current range and Health Manager at a salary above the mid-point of the salary range (currently $4343-$5645 per month) for this position classification to head the Districts' health, safety and security programs. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the General Manager to employ an Air Quality Manager at a That the General Manager be, and is salary above the mid-point of the hereby, authorized to employ Air current range Quality Manager at a salary above the mid-point of the salary range (currently $4342-5645 per month) for this position classification to head the new Air Quality Management Division in the Districts' Technical Services Department. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written report of the Executive Committee That the written report of the Executive Committee meeting held on June 26, 1991, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. -10- 07/17/91 DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and unanimously - Approving 1991-92 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1991-92 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 18,368,000 Capital Facilities Fund 24,828,000 Construction Fund - 1986 2,620,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 19,834,000 TOTAL $ 65,650,000 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 1991-92 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1991-92 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 49,266,000 Capital Facilities Fund 99,735,000 Construction Fund - 1986 4,690,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 57,780,000 TOTAL $211,471,000 lam_ DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 1991-92 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1991-92 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received,.. ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 57,573,000 Capital Facilities Fund 95,281,000 Construction Fund - 1986 5,085,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 51,358,000 TOTAL $209,297,000 DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 1991-92 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1991-92 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 13,239,000 Capital Facilities Fund 19,747,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 24,097,000 TOTAL $ 57,083,000 -11- 07/17/91 DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 1991-92 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1991-92 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 10,253,000 Capital Facilities Fund 13,572,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 9,262,000 TOTAL $ 33,OB7,000 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 1991-92 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1991-92 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund E 19,599,000 Capital Facilities Fund 39,559,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 22,793,000 Bond & Interest Fund - 1962 228,000 TOTAL S 82,179,000 DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 1 91- 2 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1991-92 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 16,174,000 Capital Facilities Fund 21,552,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 13,697,000 Bond & Interest Fund - 1958 36,000 TOTAL $ 51,459,000 DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 1991- 2 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1991-92 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the • following amounts: Operating Fund $ 1,371,000 Capital Facilities Fund 13,079,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 9,000 TOTAL $ 14,459,000 -12- 07/17/91 DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 1991-92 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget _ That the District's 1991-92 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund E 1,709,000 Capital Facilities Fund 9,964,000 TOTAL S 11,673,000 DISTRICTS 1,25,6,7 8 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Establishing the annual Gann appropriations limit for fiscal That the following resolutions year 1991-92 selecting the annual change in California per capita personal income as the cost-of-living adjustment factor, and establishing the. annual Gann appropriations limit for fiscal year 1991-92 for each District in accordance with the provisions of Division 9 of Title 1 of the California Government Code, be, and are hereby, adopted by the respective Boards of Directors: DISTRICT RESO. NO. LIMITATION 1 91-118-1 $ 2,465,000 2 91-119-2 9,144,000 3 91-120-3 12,414,000 5 91-121-5 2,316,000 6 91-122-6 1,466,000 7 91-123-7 3,596,000 �'- 11 91-124-11 2,488,000 13 --- Not Applicable 14 --- Not Applicable Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Race ve antl file repot of the Fiscal Policy Caroni ttee regarding That the report and recommendation of 1991-92 Workers' Compensation the Fiscal Policy Committee dated Excess Insurance Coverage June 26, 1991, regarding 1991-92 Workers' Compensation Excess Insurance Coverage, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried; Rao f in action of Fiscal Policy Committee in acin statutor That the action of the Fiscal Policy xcess Workers, Compensation committee in placing statutory Insurance coverage effective Excess Workers' Compensation July 1, 1991 insurance coverage, with $250,000 self-insured retention, effective July 1, 1991, for an annual premium not to exceed $43,775.00, be, and is hereby, ratified. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: �. Receive, file and approve wr tten report of the Building Committee That the written report of the \r/ Building Committee's meeting on June 20, 1991, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. -13- 07/17/91 ALL DISTRICTS Actions relative to Interplant `./ Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9 Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering reported that construction of additional treatment capacity at Reclamation Plant No. 1, which is now underway, requires a new interplant effluent pipeline and utility piping to Plant No. 2 to convey treated effluent and serve anticipated Interplant utility requirements. The Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9, will be constructed in an approximately 30-foot wide utility corridor owned by the Districts adjacent to the westerly levee of the Santa Ana River. The 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan recommended construction of this new 120-inch interplant pipeline as well as a new interplant digester gas transmission main to transfer digester gas between the two plants for the Central Generation Facilities project; an 18-inch reclaimed water line, which would provide reclaimed water to the plant in Huntington Beach as well as other users; and a fiber-optic communications cable. Mr. Dawes reported that the 1989 Master Plan estimated this project at $38 million. The Engineer's estimate was $30 million. Eleven bids were received with a low bid of $21.2 million. Staff credited the low bid partially to the currently excellent climate for receiving bids, and also because of a change in the specifications regarding the type �..� of pipe required. The Director of Engineering recommended approval of the addenda and award of the contract to the low bidder, Colich Bros. , Inc. dba Colich and Sons. Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: plans and specifications That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said job, changing the bid date from April 16, 1991 to May 21, 1991, revising the number of days allowed for completion of project and the sum to be assessed for liquidated damages, be, and is hereby, approved. Approving Addendum No. 2 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: plans and specifications That Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said job, making miscellaneous technical clarifications eliminating certain permit requirements re Santa Ana River Channel and adding a box conduit alternative to the 120-inch pipe, be, and is hereby, approved. Approving Addendum No. 3 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: plans and specifications That Addendum No. 3 to the plans and specifications for said job, changing the bid date from May 21, 1991 to June 25, 1991, making additional technical clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved. -14 07/17/91 Approving Addendum No. 4 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: plans and specifications That Addendum No. 4 to the plans and specifications for said job, including Job No. J-22-2, Replacement of Portion of Standby Ocean outfall , in said project, making additional minor technical clarifications and transmitting revised Schedule of Prices, be, and is hereby, approved. Approving Addendum No. 5 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: plans and specifications That Addendum No. 5 to the plans and specifications for said job, changing the bid date from June 25, 1991 to July 2, 1991, addressing possible sales tax increases and making additional minor technical clarifications and modifications, be, and is hereby, approved. Approving Addendum No. 6 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: plans and specifications That Addendum No. 6 to the plans and specifications for said job, providing for contractor's use of adjacent leasehold property and modifying trench and backfill requirements, be, and is hereby, approved. Awarding Job No. I-9 to Colich Moved, seconded and duly carried: Bros. , Inc. dba Colich and Sons That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 91-125, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9, to Colich Bros. , Inc. dba Colich and Sons, in the total amount of $21,328,600.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Plant No. 1 Control Center Instrumentation, Job No. J-23-2, and Re lacement of Computerized Monitoring ystem at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-44 Verbal Staff Report The Director of Engineering reported that in March 1991 the Directors approved plans and specifications for two computerized treatment plant monitoring and control system projects, Job No. J-23-2, which will install a new system in the control center building currently under construction at Plant No. 1; and Job No. P2-44, which will replace an existing computerized monitoring system at Plant No. 2. Mr. Dawes advised that five manufacturers were prequalified by the Boards in August 1990, including the low bidder, HSQ Technology/Allen-Bradley, to supply the equipment for these jobs. He noted that these systems will give the Operations staff better access to information concerning the operation of the plants, produce . historical data and have the ability to control all process equipment from the Operations Centers at both facilities. -15- 07/17/91 He further reported that the project at Plant No. 1 will install the necessary hardware, software and data highway in order to monitor `✓ process functions for both existing and future master-planned facilities. Ultimately, the system will have the ability to provide distributed control for all plant functions from the Plant No. 1 Control Center/Operations and Maintenance Building, Job No. J-23-1, which is currently under construction. The project at Plant No 2 will replace the existing computer monitoring system, which is of mid-1970's technology, with an identical system proposed for Plant No. 1 facilities. The existing computer hardware is obsolete and trained service personnel are unavailable. Mr. Dawes advised that four bids were received in May for this work (which was bid as a single contract), ranging from $3.75 million to $5.15 million. The Districts have received protests from two bidders. Staff agreed that the bid of JWP, the second low bidder, was non-responsive and recommended that this bid be rejected. The Districts' expert consultant who drew up the plans and specifications from EMA. Inc. , was present. Mr. Joe Hirte, of EMA, was prepared to testify that he has reviewed the protests and that nothing has been presented to show that the HSQ Technology bid deviates from the plans and specifications. The EMA representative was present to answer questions and amplify on EMA's letter of June 25, 1991. Mr. Dawes explained that the interpretation of Addendum No. 2 was one issue. Staff's intent under Addendum No. 2 was to make the manufacturer of the data concentrators responsible for the software as well. Mr. Dawes advised that HSQ Technology, the first low bidder, which is supplying approved Allen-Bradley equipment, has stated in various letters that they can, in fact, comply 100% with the requirements of the specifications and addenda. Allen-Bradley has also assured the Districts in writing of their ability to comply with the specifications. The Director of Engineering recommended that the Boards approve the addenda, receive and file the Staff Report and various letters received in connection with the protest and award of this project, and open the floor for oral public comments. Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried: dated June 24, 1991 That the Staff Report dated June 24, 1991, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file General Counsel 's Moved, seconded and duly carried: Memoranda dated July 5 1 91 and July B, 1991 That the General Counsel 's Memoranda dated July 5, 1991 and July B, 1991, relative to the protests received re award of Job Nos. J-23-2 and P2-44 to either of the two apparent low bidders, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: plans and specifications That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said jobs, changing the bid date from April 16, 1991 to May 21, 1991 and making miscellaneous technical clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved. -16- 07/17/91 Approving Addendum No. 2 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: plans and specifications That Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said Jobs, making miscellaneous technical clarifications, providing for installation of preapproved equipment by manufacturers, and revising insurance requirements, be, and is hereby, approved. Receive and file letters rotestin Moved, seconded and duly carried: award of said Jobs to either of he two apparent low bidders That the following letters protesting award of Job Nos. J-23-2 and P2-44 to either of the two apparent low bidders on the basis that their bids did not meet the specifications, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed: From Dated Sachs Electric Company 5/22/91 Sachs Electric Company 6/04/91 Johnson Yokogawa Corporation 6/04/91 Westinghouse Electric Corporation 6/05/91 Pacific Parts and Controls, Inc. 6/27191 Johnson Yokogawa Corporation 7/03/91 Sachs Electric Company 7/05/91 l -- _ Receive and file letters supporting Moved, seconded and duly carried: award of Job Nos. J-23-2 and P2-44 to low bidder That the following letters supporting award of Job Nos. J-23-2 and P2-44 to the low bidder, HSQ Technology, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed: From Dated HSQ Technology 5/30/91 EMA, Inc. 5/30/91 Allen Bradley 6/06/91 HSQ Technology - 6/07/91 _ HSQ Technology 6/07/91 EMA, Inc. 6/25/91 Oral comments Sachs Electric The Chairman recognized Mr. Richard Zuroweste, Regional Manager for Sachs Electric (the third low bidder) , who had submitted a written protest. He stated that his company was a national electrical contractor and that their market is focused on industrial customers. Mr. Zuroweste advised that Nick Pregibon and Heather Wells, both representing Westinghouse (a prequalified equipment supplier) , were present that evening. He then introduced Mr. Craig Rossell , counsel for Sachs Electric. -17- 07/17/91 Mr. Rossell addressed the Boards and suggested that they add to their agenda a motion to set aside the apparent first and second low bidders as being non-responsive and award the contract for Jobs Nos. J-23-2 and P2-44 to Sachs Electric. He stated his belief that Sachs Electric was the lowest responsive bidder. He asserted that the specifications called for standard control systems and that the data concentrator manufacturer shall provide all operation and application software associated with the system described in the specifications. He also asserted that the bid submitted by HSQ did not comply with these specifications. Mr. Rossell noted Sachs Electric's bid provided for the hardware, software, application software and operations maintenance to be provided by Westinghouse. With regard to the bid of HSQ he further asserted his belief that Allen-Bradley would provide the hardware and software but that they would not be providing the application software. Mr. Rossell then asserted that the award of Job Nos. J-23-2 and P2-44 should not be made to HSQ based on the findings of a 1988 4th District Case, Konica Business Systems vs. Regents of the University of California, whicn he, in sumna ry, claimed in a similar situation set Ts-idea contract for copying services because the low bidder deviated from the specifications resulting in a competitive advantage. Mr. Rossell also questioned wording in a June 6, 1991 letter submitted by Allen-Bradley which, he asserted, seemed to indicate that they would not be providing the software, but, rather, would only be working with the contractor (HSQ) to provide it; which he further asserted was contrary to the specifications. He reiterated his request that the Boards set aside the first and second low bids and award the contract to Sachs Electric. Modicon, Inc. Joe Melton and Ken Jennings representing Modicon, Inc. (an equipment supplier that was not prequalified) then addressed the Boards. Mr. Melton asserted that the specifications were written with an unfair advantage to Allen-Bradley. He further asserted that Allen-Bradley was the only PLC vendor that was prequalified to bid versus three DCS vendors, and that they were quite different technologies and, therefore, provided an unfair economic advantage to Allen-Bradley. They also asserted that their system was much faster than the one being considered and alleged that they could save the Districts a considerable amount of money. Johnson Yokogawa Corporation Mr. James Murphy, . representing Johnson Yokogawa Corporation (a prequalified equipment supplier and the fourth low bidder) stated that his firm was a distributed control system manufacturer, principally in the water and wastewater treatment market place. Johnson Yokogama had submitted a written protest. He concurred with Sachs Electric's assertion that the HSQ/Allen-Bradley bid was non-responsive. He expressed his belief that Allen Bradley would not accept responsibility for the software. He further commented that it was his belief that the Districts wanted a single source of supply and that the supplier must be able to support the system for future expansion, and asserted that HSQ would not meet those qualifications. Mr. Murphy urged the Boards to deny the award to HSQ/Allen-Bradley. -18- 07/17/91 Pacific Parts and Controls, Inc. �-- Mr. Kevin Renek, representing Pacific Parts and Controls, Inc. (neither a bidder nor a prequalified equipment supplier, who had submitted a written protest) , then addressed the Boards. He reiterated what Sachs Electric had asserted that the software should be supplied by the data concentrator manufacturer. It was his contention that HSQ is not the data concentrator manufacturer, and alleged that Allen-Bradley had disclaimed support of the software system. Mr. Renek noted that his firm both sold the software and would support it. He asserted that the Districts could get a better and more flexible system and save money if they chose a system such as Modicon or others offered. Consultant and Staff response to The Director of Engineering comments pointed out to Directors that the issue was not how good Sachs/ Westinghouse or other unsuccessful bidders were, but whether the low bidder, HSQ/Allen-Bradley, could meet the specifications and perform the work. He noted that Westinghouse was prequalified and staff did not dispute whether they could provide the equipment and service. Mr. Dawes stated that the staff and consultant believe that Allen-Bradley can, in fact, supply the hardware and the software in team with HSQ and meet the specifications, as amended by Addendum No. 2, and that no information had been presented to demonstrate that they cannot meet them. The Chair then recognized Mr. Joe Hirte, of EMA, Inc. , the Districts' 1 / consultant who prepared the plans and specifications for these �•r� projects. Mr. Hirte stated that he had not seen or heard anything different that evening that changed his mind with regard to HSQ's ability to meet the specifications. He noted that HSQ and Allen-Bradley have not taken any exceptions to the specifications in their bid proposal. - With regard to comments made by Modicon, Mr. Hirte acknowledged that at the time specifications were prepared, PLCs were not the issue. Modicon did not have a system that would.meet the Districts' requirements at that time. Since then, however, they have developed a system that would work well , but it did not exist when the other suppliers were prequalified. Mr. Hirte reiterated that he and the Districts' staff believe that HSQ/Allen-Bradley can provide the system specified. Denying request of protesters Directors entered into a to declare the apparent low b d discussion relative to the of HSQ Technology non-responsive protests of Sachs Electric, and to reject said bid Modicon, Johnson Yokogawa Corporation, Westinghouse Electric Corporation and Pacific Parts and Controls, Inc. relative to award of Job Nos. J-23-2 and P2-44 to either the first or second apparent low bidders on the basis that their bids did not meet the specifications. They considered referring the matter to a special committee of Directors. -19- 07/17/91 Directors questioned the advantages and disadvantages of the two types of computer systems. Districts' consultant, Mr. Hirte, stated his belief that there was no advantage to the DCS system. He pointed out that there was a pre-bid conference held for all bidders where they were given an opportunity to ask questions and clarify the technical specifications. Accordingly, all bidders knew that Allen-Bradley was one of the prequalified bidders. The Assistant General Counsel commented that the protesters had defined the word "provide" in the specifications as best benefited them. He reiterated that Allen-Bradley had been designated up front as one of the eligible bidders. He pointed out that the Staff Report notes what Addendum No. 2 was intended to do and that EMA and Allen-Bradley staffs confirmed that the bid proposal meets the intent of this addendum, and has assured the Districts that they assume full responsibility for their system. Mr. Shaw added that written guarantees would be required at the time the contract is executed. In response to inquiries from Directors relative to whether this was a joint venture between HSQ and Allen-Bradley and whether surety and performance bonds are required on this contract, Mr. Shaw responded that the Districts' contract would be with HSQ. HSQ would then have a subcontract with AllenBradley. He also advised that surety and performance bonds were required. Directors further discussed their options, including rebidding the project and the potential additional cost or cost savings associated with each alternative. \./ It was pointed out by Directors that if the low bidder submitted its bid in accordance with the proper bidding procedures, states that the specifications will be met, and the staff and consultant agree that the bidder can meet the specifications, there was no reason to reject the bid and backtrack at this point. It was then moved and seconded that the requests of Sachs Electric, Johnson Yokogawa Corporation, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Pacific Parts and Controls, Inc. and Modicon, Inc. , to reject the apparent low bid of HSQ Technology on the basis that their bid did not meet the specifications, be denied. During further discussion by Directors, Mr. James McMillan, representing HSQ Technology, and Mr. Lou Cline, representing Allen-Bradley, responded to the assertions by the protesters that Allen-Bradley would not support their software. They pointed out that the statement mentioned earlier--that Allen-Bradley does not sell or support HSQ Technology software--was taken from a standard catalog sheet that was published some time ago. It was attached to the letter of HSQ Technology only to show that they had worked together in the past. He stated that it is true that Allen-Bradley does not sell off-the-shelf HSQ Technology but that statement was taken completely out of context when mentioned previously. He pointed out another statement taken out of context was the quote from Allen-Bradley's letter regarding standing behind or supporting HSQ. Mr. McMillan stressed that if the entire letter had been read, it unequivacably states that Allen-Bradley stands behind and will support and guarantee the software and will be there through the duration of the contract. -20- 07/17/91 Mr. Cline, Manager of the Program Management Group of Allen-Bradley, refuted the comments that they are only a hardware supplier. He added that he is responsible for the systems business they do within the government arena. He advised that Allen-Bradley routinely takes on systems projects. Sometimes they do the work themselves and sometimes they subcontract the work. He firmly stated that they were more than just an equipment supplier--they are a systems supplier. Mr. Cline advised that what they endeavored to do with regard to the Districts' requirements was to work with HSQ to develop a systems solution which meets all of the specifications. On behalf of Allen-Bradley, he certified that they willassume responsibility for this system and are 100% compliant with the specifications. Following a call for the question, the following motion was duly carried by voice vote: That the Boards of Directors do hereby deny the requests of Sachs Electric, Johnson Yokogawa Corporation, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Pacific Parts and Controls, Inc. and Modicon, Inc. to reject the low bid of HSQ Technology on the basis that it does not meet the specifications. Declaring the bid of JWP Controls Moved, seconded and duly carried: as non-responsive and rejecting said bid That the bid of JWP Controls is hereby declared as non-responsive; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said bid be, and is hereby, rejected. —.. Declar bitd f e chology Moved, seconded and duly carried: o Qce re5 onli s HTos and awarding Job Nos. J- 3-2 and P2-44 That the bid of HSQ Technology, to H echnology be, and is hereby, declared as responsive to the plans and specifications; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 91-126, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Plant No. 1 Control Center Instrumentation, Job No. J-23-2, and Replacement of Computerized Monitoring System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P244, to HSQ Technology in the total amount of $3,752,000.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awa rtlin contracts for marine onitoring Vessel for water uality That the Boards of Directors hereby k Surve in ecificat on No. b7 adopt Resolution No. 91-127, Revised to ME Analytical receiving and filing bid tabulation 5vstems, Inc. and to eaven ures and recommendation and awarding contracts for Marine Monitoring Vessel for Water Quality Surveying, Specification No. S-053 (Revised) , to MEC Analytical Systems, Inc., for the period July 1, 1991 to June 30, 1992, for a total amount not to exceed $48,229.00, and to Seaventures, for the period beginning September 1, 1991 to June 30, 1992, for a total amount not to exceed $13,440.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ��.✓ -21- 07/17/91 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding contract for Marine `✓ Monito rin Vessel for Coastal That the Boards of Directors hereby Waters, ec f cation No. -054 adopt Resolution No. 91-128, [Revised2 to Encnanter, inc. receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Marine Monitoring Vessel for Coastal Waters, Specification No. S-054 (Revised) to Enchanter, Inc. for the period July 1, 1991 to June 30, 1992, for an estimated annual cost of $105,840.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authurizin the General ana er to execute Gas ervice Agreements with That the General Manager be, and is the Southern California ties Company hereby, authorized to execute Gas Service Agreements with the Southern California Gas Company, in form approved by the General Counsel , to allow purchase of supplemental natural gas at the standard cogeneration rate established by the California Public Utilities Commission for use in the Districts' Central Power Generation Systems at Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2 and for other plant uses. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing parjlcipa ion in the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement That the Boards of Directors hereby with rvine Ranch Water u1strict, adopt Resolution No. 91-129, Oran a ount Water District, approving and authorizing Munict al Water D strict of Orange participation in the Joint Exercise County and an Juan tsasin Authority, of Powers Agreement creating the �i creating the National Water National Water Research Institute, Research institute between the Sanitation Districts, Irvine Ranch Water District, Orange County Water District, Municipal Water District of Orange County and San Juan Basin Authority; approving an annual contribution of $50,000 for Districts' share of the administrative budget of said Institute; and authorizing the Joint Chairman to appoint the Districts' representative to the Board of Directors of the Institute. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Convene in closed session pursuan to overnment ode Sections b49bb.9 The Boards convened in closed session and 54957.6 at 9:12 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9 and 54957.6. ALL DISTRICTS At 9:20 p.m. the Boards reconvened in Reconvene in regular session regular session. ALL DISTRICTS Upon return from closed session, the Author zin sett ement of Workers Assistant General Counsel reported out ompensat on aim of R20ard nge the action taken by the Boards relative to settlement of a Workers' Compensation claim filed by a former District employee, Richard Engel. He advised that the Districts' outside Special Counsel had negotiated a proposed settlement in the amount of $21,000.00, less approved attorneys' fees and credit for advances against permanent disability already received. The Directors, during closed session, concurred with that recommendation and authorized said payment. -22- 07/17/91 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: �..✓ A royln MOUs with Administrative and lerical Employee Unit and That Memoranda of Understanding with Technical Services Employee Unit Administrative and Clerical Employee Unit and the Technical Services Employee Unit, for a three-year period, be, and are hereby, approved for the period November 30, 1990 through November 25, 1993, in accordance with the action taken by the Boards in closed session on July 17, 1991. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amendin Classification and Comp a n satjon Resolution No. 7 -20, That the Boards of Directors hereby as amendetl, and Terms and adopt Resolution No. 91-134, amending Conditions of Employment Resolution Classification and Compensation No. 79-21, as amended, re changes Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, and in salaries and benefits for Terms and Conditions of Employment Administrative and Clerical Resolution No. 79-21, as amended, Employee Unit and Technical incorporating changes in salaries and Services Employee Unit benefits for Districts' Administrative and Clerical Employee Unit and Technical Services Employee Unit effective as provided in the Memorada of Understanding with said units. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 7 8 it Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adopting fees, procedures and policies concerning annexations of That the Boards of Directors hereby territory to the Districts adopt the following resolutions adapting fees, procedures and policies concerning annexations of territory to the Districts, incorporating the findings of the n202O VISION" Master Plan, determining that the adoption of the annexation fees is statutorily exempt under CEQA and repealing the resolutions adapted in 1982: Repealing Acrea a Fee Resolution Resolution w Tax w o Tax Dist. No. No. Exchange Exchange 2 91-113-2 82-136-2 $29922 $3,908 3 91-114-3 82-137-3 $3,154 $4,139. 5 91-115-5 82-138-5 $3,054 $4,084 7 91-116-7 82-139-7 $2,902 $3,883 11 91-117-11 82-140-11 $4,843 $5,830 Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:20 p.m. , July 17, 1991. -23- 07/17/91 DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:20 p.m., July 17, 1991. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:20 p.m., July 17, 1991. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:20 p.m. , July 17, 1991. DISTRICT 3. Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin A regiment with the Redeve10 ment enc of the it of That the Board of Directors hereby Los Alamitos and the City of Los adopts Resolution No. 91-131-3, Alamitos approving Agreement with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Alamitos and the City of Los Alamitos, electing tax increment pass-through relative to the Las Alamitos Redevelopment Project, in accordance with District policy and pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33676(a)(1). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 - . Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:20 p.m. , July 17, 1991. DISTRICTS 7 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin Change rder No. 2 0 e ans and s eclfications for That Change Order No. 2 to the plans contract No. 14-1-Z and specifications for Baker Force Mains, from Main Street Pump Station to Bristol Street, Contract No. 14-1-2, authorizing an addition of $8,074.00 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc., for two items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 14 - Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:20 p.m. , July 17, 1991. -24- 07/17/91 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: - Approving Professional rvices Agreement with Willdan Associates That the Selection Committee for preparation of a project report certification of the final negotiated re Santa Ana River Interceptor fee relative to the Professional Relief Sewer, Contract No. 2-31 . Services Agreement with Willdan Associates for preparation of a project report to evaluate alternate alignments and make recommendations for a portion of the Santa Ana River Interceptor, between Grove Street and Yorba Park, to be known as Santa Ana River Interceptor Relief Sewer, Contract No. 2-31, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 91-130-2, approving said agreement with Willdan Associates for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit., for a total amount not to exceed $56,700.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 1 8 2 Actions relative to Amendment No. 1 to 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan; and Supplement No. 2 to Program Environmental Impact Report on said Amendment Verbal report of staff The Director of Engineering reported that the 1989 �✓ Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, as well as the earlier 1986 District No. 2 Master Plan, identified the need to parallel the Orange Subtrunk, extending from the Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI) , easterly under the Santa Ana River and the Santa Ana Freeway in La Veta Avenue to the intersection of Flower Street, at an estimated cost of $330,000 (1989 dollars). Since the Master Plan was completed, and particularly in the last year, newly-planned large developments in both the City of Orange and the City of Santa Ana have been identified which will necessitate the construction of a larger parallel line than originally envisioned and possibly extending it east of the previously. planned terminus at Flower Street. The estimated cost today would be about $800,000. Mr. Dawes further reported that the large developments include major office complexes in the Cities of Santa Ana and Orange adjacent to Main Place, and large developments both north and south of La Vets Avenue in the City of Orange. Staff has investigated the regional sewering responsibilities with the Cities of Orange and Santa Ana and all agree that a realigned, joint project would best serve the needs of both cities under a negotiated cost-sharing agreement. He advised that Sanitation District No. 2 operates the Orange Subtrunk in La Veta Avenue mentioned above. That subtrunk was to have been paralleled to serve identified needs northerly of La Veta Avenue. Southerly of La Veta Avenue, primarily within the City of Santa Ana, the District operates trunk sewers in Bristol Street and Main Street which drain from north to south. Those sewers are identified as having -25- 07/17/91 adequate capacity to serve identified projects in Santa Ana. Mr. Dawes pointed out, however, that in both cities the proposed development is now substantially larger than previously anticipated. Within Santa Ana, projects include an expansion of the Bekins office building, Fidelity Federal property, a large expansion of Main Place and within the Town and Country area and Main Street Concourse. Those expansions may range to nearly 10 million square feet, including over 1200 hotel rooms. Additional large expansions are planned in Orange, both north and south of La Vets Avenue. The Director of Engineering noted that staff believes that while the Bristol Street and Main Street sewers, previously calculated to have adequate capacity, could still serve District No. 1 needs in the forseeable future, that capacity might be better saved for projects in the center of the City of Santa Ana to preclude the necessity of future paralleling of lines in those major streets. The staffs of the cities and the Districts, together with Districts' consultant, Boyle Engineering Corporation, have identified an alternative to constructing the Orange Subtrunk relief and various major sewer construction projects in both the cities. That project would be the Memory Lane Interceptor at a cost of about $4.1 million dollars. The project would begin at the SARI line, extend easterly under the Santa Ana River and in Memory Lane to Parker Street and north in Parker Street to La Veta Avenue. The final terminus would be the intersection of Batavia Street and La Vets Avenue where major City of Orange sewers would be intercepted, thereby eliminating the need to build sewers paralleling the Orange Subtrunk and city sewers in La Veta Avenue as well as planned City of Santa Ana sewers which would deliver water to the Districts' trunks in Main Street and Bristol Street. Districts' staff estimated that the cost of the Orange Subtrunk paralleling would be approximately $800,000. The staff of the City of Orange has estimated that their sewer needs would total close to $1 million, while Santa Ana sewer needs may range to $2.3 million. The estimated cost of the Memory Lane Interceptor is equivalent to the cost of other sewering alternatives. However, the benefit to the Districts would be the preservation of existing capacity in existing Districts' trunk sewers for future needs. Mr. Dawes noted that in informal discussions with the staffs of the Cities, Santa Ana is expected to contribute $1.3 million with the City of Orange contributing $700,000. The remaining $2.1 million would be shared approximately equally between Districts 1 and 2. A draft cost-sharing agreement is under review by General Counsel , staff and staffs of the Cities. He pointed out that the actions that evening were to authorize staff and consultants to comnence the environmental work on the change to the Master Plan, and an amendment to the Master Plan. Staff recommended approval of the Project Report and agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for the engineering and environmental studies. Mr. Dawes advised that they would proceed with the work immediately and should be -26- 07/17/91 ready to bid the first part of next year. He indicated the Districts �-- want to complete the work in Owens Drive on the east side of Main Street prior to commencement of CALTRANS' project to widen the Santa Ana Freeway in that area because they will be removing the Main Street Bridge over the freeway. Receive and file Project Report re Moved, seconded and duly carried: Memory Lane Interceptor, Con rat No. 2-30 That the Project Report re Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30, prepared by Boyle Engineering Corporation be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file Staff Report re Moved, seconded and duly carried: Supplement No. 2 to Program Environmental Impact Report That the Staff Report dated June 20, 1991 re Supplement No. 2 to Program Environmental Impact Report re said Amendment No. 1 to 1989 Master Plan, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file Initial Study and Moved, seconded and duly carried: Environmental Impact Assessment re Contract No. 2-30 That the Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment relative to said Contract No. 2-30, finding that said project could have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, Supplement No. 2 to the Program Environmental Impact Report will be required, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICTS 1 8 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering That the Selection Committee Corporation for preparation of certification of the final negotiated Amendment No. 1 to 1989 Collection, fee relative to the Professional Treatment and sa Dis 01 Faciies Services Agreement with Boyle Master Plan; upplement lit No. 2 to Engineering Corporation for Program Environmental Impact Report preparation of Amendment No. 1 to the on said Amendment No. 1 to the 1989 1989 Collection, Treatment and Master Plan; and design of Contract Disposal Facilities Master Plan No. 2-30 relative to the Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30; Supplement No. 2 to Program Environmental Impact Report on said Amendment No. 1 to the 1989 Master Plan; and for planning, design and construction support services re Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 91-132, approving said agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for said services, on an hourly-rate basis forlabor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $223,330.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -27- 07/17/91 DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:27 p.m., July 17, 1991. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:27 p.m., July 17, 1991. DISTRICT 7 Actions re Relocation of iche son Pump Station, Contract No. -11-2 Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering reported that in March 1991 the Directors approved the plans and specifications for the Relocation of the Michelson Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-2. This project includes the construction of a new, replacement pump station which will provide sewer service for "Park Place", the large development planned for the former Fluor site, and adjacent properties. The Districts' staff and General Counsel have worked with the developers of "Park Place", Crow Winthrop Development, and they have approved the design of the pump station as it will be built on their property. They will be responsible for the landscaping around the pump station. Mr. Dawes advised that 11 bids had been received, and he recommended approval of the addenda and award of a contract to the low bidder, Mitchell Pacific Constructors, Inc., in the amount of $1,827,136.00 which was well under the engineer's estimate of $3,000,000.00. A rovtn Addendum No. 1 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: plans antl specif No. ons That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said job, clarifying provisions relative to the contract documents, be, and is hereby, approved. Approving Addendum No. 2 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: plans and specifications That Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said job, providing for the project to include construction of a 24-inch sewer from Carlson Avenue to the new pump station and abandonment of the existing pump station and appurtenant facilities, be, and is hereby, approved. Approving Addendum No. 3 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: plans and specifications That Addendum No. 3 to the plans and specifications for said job, changing the bid date from June 18, 1991 to June 25, 1991, clarifying the sales tax rate, transmitting revised Schedule of Prices and including City of Irvine Encroachment �./ Permit Standard Conditions, be, and is hereby, approved. -P8- 07/17/91 Approving Addendum No. 4 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: �- plans and specifications That Addendum No. 4 t0 the plans and specifications for said job, clarifying requirements re traffic control and working hours, be, and is hereby, approved. Awarding Contract No. 7-11-2 to Moved, seconded and duly carried: Mitchell Pacific Constructors, Inc. That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 91-133-7, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding Relocation of Michelson Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-2, to Mitchell Pacific Constructors, Inc. in the total amount of $1,827,136.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:28 p.m. , July 17, 1991. 5ecretary of he Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 29 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 29- FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/29/91 PAGE I REPORT NUMBE4 AP43 _ _ COUNTY_SANITATION DISTRICTS GF. ORANGE CD U NIT CLAIMS PAID 06/05/91 POSTING DATE 06105/91 VARIANT NO....._. . . ._... . . . ..... VENDOR ... __.__.._...__.. — _AA0UNI_— _____ _DESCRIPTION.. .._. 114703 AT It T $1.092.11 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICE ._111104._. . _ LINCOLN CARPETS L .INTER I GAS.____.._ _— __u05.4fBUILDING MATERIALS_____._ ___.___ 114T05 AIR PRODUCTS f CHEMICAL IN $16.114.00 DAM AGREEMENT-OXY GEN. EYST. M.O.8-9-09 124706 ALPHAGAZ 9151.41 SPECIALTY GASES tL.213.72____EEEUND.USER_FEE_OVERPAYMENT- 114700 AMERICAN FLEET PARTS $44.60 TRUCK PARTS 114789 AMERICAN MEDIA INC $207.95 VIDEO RENTAL _. 114730_ . . _ .....ANAHEIM GENERAL. HOSPITAL_... ._...____._ __— _.__ _J 9.S31.11—_._.___..__._.. . REFUND USER-FEE OVERPAYMENT__.______ 114711 ANAHEIM MEDICAL ARTS OLDS i1.951.28 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 114712 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO $595.72 BUILDING MATERIALS BLANL..P__ANDERSOR_-- —_. _f62■.55_ _.__._-TRAVEL..A_MEBTIMG. EXPENSE_— —. 114714 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $4.311.94 NOTICES A ADS 114715 ARENS INDUSTRIES INC 9544.3/ INSTRUMENT PARTS APN__TECHNOLOGIES.__._ —. ._—_. _____f bf O.OD—_.___ —_ _.COMPUTER.SOMAR6_SERVICES_. 114717 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING f2.374.60 SOIL TESTING H.O.4-11-90 114718 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $59.678.94 RESIDUALS REMOVALS H.O.7-13-88 BABCOCS.DISPLAY.PRODUCTS. IN _—__ __IL Sfi.14______._._ REFUND USER FEB..OVERFAYMENC = IU 720 BACKFLON PREVENTION DEVICE f64.00 BACKFLON TESTING 114721 BAKER PLYWOOD CO INC $1,691.33 BUILDING MATERIALS to 115722__..._..... BALZEPS_TOOL_COATIJG_--_____ 1510.11_ ___._._ REFUND_USER..ESE OVERPAYMENT_ 114723 BARBARY COAST CABARET ill1.10 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 114724 BAKTER DIAGNOSTICS INC f2.772.66 LAB SUPPLIES 311AT25___.. __ ..BESE_WESTEBX /XY._._.._—.._ 12S.S'L__ _RRFUUD.USSR_FELOVERPAYNEUP 1 114726 ROBERT BILOTTI f1,100.90 LIABILITY CLAIM �-' 114727 BOOT BARN 11101.07 SAFETY SHOES .._BRENNER-FIEDLER_ 6._.ASSOC._.ltl.___._.__—_. ASS.a9_.__—____.NBCHANICAL_PARTS.__ 114729 AVC INC $211.30 INSTRUMENT REPAIR 114730 BROWN t CALDWELL {275.00 LAB SERVICES CALDVELL_..CONSULTING 251.112.117 _2NGIMEERING-BERVICEO_Oe1"1-35.P2-39 114732 STEVE RONALD CONSTRUCTION CO $1.757,159.39 CONSTRUCTION 2-26-3,2-28,2-29 114733 BUDGET INN $674.15 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT _114734. .. BUILDER-$ . EMPORIUM 114735 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE $75.96 PUBLICATION 114736 GARY 0 STREET) $410.34 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT _111737—._—..__ .CQSIPA ..... .. _. . ._. .__ ._....___ ._. _____tfR.DO—.__--___ .TRAINING REGISTRATION.__._ 114736 CS COMPANY $915.56 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 114739 CAL-PAC CHEMICAL CO INC $393.54 CHEMICALS 111790 : ._ C44TRQL INC. .. _.. . .. . _ {31.f.1L _.INSTRUMENT SUPPLIED____ _ 114742 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC BAT[ f2$128.00 SERVICE USER 114713 CANNON EQUIPMENT VEST INC fI8B.00 REFUND USB0. PER OVERPAYMENT 114744 JOHNCENT _CBRANDS INC.6INCER} . . _.. .. ..—___}2$1,153.1L___. REFUND USER FEE OVES_P1-34.P1�29. 114744 CENTRE BRANDS IN il•$58.06 SAFETY USER FES OVERPAYMENT 111745 CENTURY SAFETY 198T 6 SUPP ISBN OB SAFETY SUPPLIES .114746_.. .. .. CHEVRON VSA ..IRD _. _ _ __Ifl9d5____._..—... ._..._OIL 114747 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $1.251.50 FITTINGS 1/4748 COMPUTER BAY $134.56 COMPUTER SOFTWARE FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5129/91 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP63 COUNTY .SANITATION-D1STR1CT5_OF_➢RAMSE.000NTIL____.- CLAIMS PAID 46/05/91 POSTING DATE 06/85/91 WARRANLND....... ...__ -._-_.__.__VESDOR .___._-_ _.____. •SODNT ___ __ DESCRIP.TION_____--_-_._ _ 114749 CONARD•S PH➢TOGRA+HY $223.65 PHOTO SERVICES 111IT5e .._ CONNELL. 6N .. PARTS-1- DIY ._..__ __-_____ - ___S338.69- _. TRUCK PARTS .-_._.._ 111751 CONSOLIDATED ALELTELECT DIST 19.236.6E ELECTRIC PARTS 11415E COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 31.359.10 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES _119.754 __._ _..__. CRANE-EMPLOYMENT DP_ __-__._._..._... ._ _._-_- J799.BS-____... ___ REFUND G USER FEE OVERPAYMENT - 114755 CA EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 160.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT' 11175E DSTATEAILY OF CALIFORNIA 3160.00 NOTICES PROCE9SING FEE 119756. .__- . _ .. DARES..PILOT. ____.___ ________ ______s78.00__.__...-._.__ _. _._ CONSULT 6 ADS______. 114759 DARESS MTIRE f3l0fil.31 CONSULTING BERG. - BARTIgVAR6 PREPAREDNESS 11A75B DANIELSAP TIRE SERVICE f1.697.53 TIRES .114754__-_. . ._. . GLEN DAVIDSON._LOR[__.__._ _.__.___ .�1.390.00-_..__..____. TRAINING EXB_._ 11176E BLEW E DAVIDSON 920.07 TRAINING EXPENSE 111761 DALBERTEPT.- Y ISHTES INC f68.920.07 CONSTRUCTION 7-13 ..11976E ..� _._-DEPT.._QE_ND/OR _..6LNE__—__ -__,123.00-_-_-- - --__ VALOR ATIOtl_FE88_-__-___ _ I11763 DORADO AND/OR CS CO 23.439.96 VALVE MAINTENANCE 111766 DOVER. ENTERPRISES INC fE1.1e9.96 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 RBPAIRB =T7H 114765_ .__.-_OUNKEL LBROS OI_ACHCOM MOVING PACE RENTAL J-19 116767 OUNNEL WARD MACH MOVING 91.590.92 78 SPACE RENTAL J-19A .,.. 111767 OUNN EONAS-- CORD t60.T8 PAINT SUPPLIfi9 N. t14760__._____._EIS_ COLNBS_3U[PLY_..-. ______ $2,680.09 _ VALVE_.__.- 1147TO EBERHAR INC f2.600.89 OFFICE 9UPPLI65 � 1117T0 ENERNRRO EQUIPMENT $68.3? TRUCK PARTS n_114771..-...-._ENCHANTE_PL INCCM611___ .000.00 OCEAN _ONITOREE_GH.O.3-ISENT 1 114773 ENCHANTER I f/.000.22 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.J-19-90 N 111173 ENGINEERS SALES-SERVICE CO 949.22 POMP PARTS 4775 _....__FAWN PRESSF.LLR[NS1E1111E_-. +9.253.65_- __-_OFFICETSUPON_EERYICE]_1r7n9_- 114776 FAX PRESS 130.75 AIR SUPPLIES 111776 FEDERAL PRES! CARP $130.7E AIR FREIGHT _114777.-.._____.FISCHE -SUPPLY . ER-____ +Y6.L6 CHLORINATION_PARTS _ 114779 FISCHES S PORTER CO f91.969.65 CHLORINATION PARTS 119700 PLO-SYSTEMS 11.969.6E PUMP PARTS _114781 __.FLUID--- F FOUNT SYSTEMS..ALVE___-._ - - $4.339.46 --PUMP PARTS _ 114782 FOXT OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $2.922.05 WATER U58 1167e2 FULLER➢ CO / HAS SYSTEMS f2.l02.OS VALVES -.FMLLERTON_fD INCf COMMUN_U96R_FS SUPPLIES 1167e1 GGMFAN SOUND I f$11.32 COMMUNICATIONS SUPPLIES 11178E iANAHL LUMBER CO f71.l2 HARDWARE/LUMBER EOCRRL...tEIEPHOME..CO___ .__. .119.66 -TELEPHONE_SERVICES G --_-._ 131787 EOR LEECH L ASSOCIATES $1 f1.13e.3 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 11410 61ERLILICHELL INCfU1797.35 MECHANICAL PARTS AINGER 11791 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS51.62/.09 FILM 114 DON OX 6R EEK L ASSOCIATES IATES 9E6.917.50 SURVEYING 98RVIC88 RES 68-72 He TYPE L .ORAPHILS_..__......__.___--_ _. 116793 HACH COMPANY $1,616.42 LAB 9UPPLIES 114794 HALVORSEN-STRIP SMOPPIMS CRT $163.54 REFUND USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT FUND NO 9199 - JI GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5120191 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBEI AP43 _. . _ COUNTY SANIT/TION_QISTRj;j3 OF_ORPNOE_COUNTY.._ CLAIMS PAID 06/05/91 POSIINB DATE D6/D5/91 WARRANT AIO. , . .YENOORAND M7 _._ DES CAI PT 191,0 __.________-. 114795 HARBOR INN TRAVELODGE $2.863.27 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 114 796 MATCH A KIRK INC 1739 IB_ MECHANICAL PARTS. 114797 PL HARM co IN2 - 31rSI8.T6 --_ _ - - -- - FILTERS 114798 HEWLETT PACMARD COMPANY 1285.42 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 114799 _ HORIZON HIGH-REACH 9600 - J.T. $41li.T _ HURYAM6 ASSOE. TRUCR_PARTS_.__ ...-_____ _ .__.__ .. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, J-7-9 114801 HOUSE OF BATTERIES S/S2.09 BATTERIES - 114009 MOWELL AVENUE ENTERPRISES _ _f19931.51 _- ._. _.._ _ REFUND USER FBS_OVERPAYMENT_ 11ib89 p5 MUGNES co* III: f236.26 PAINT SUPPLIES 114084 ROONEY HUNT CO 110.856.61 PUMP PARTS _ 114845 ___HUNTINGTON,__BEACNRUB_B_E_R._S7A, _f;5.}jOFFICE_SUPPLIES IIO ___ HUNTINGTON SUPPLY $793.99 HARDWARE 119807 HIGH DIE INC $8.119.36 OIL _115808 _ INR , INDUSTRIES_ _ ____,_,_,._-_ls_ID.75_. . _ . ELECTRIC_SUPPLIES II iS 9 IlT , _„GAMMON ELECTRIC $944.50 REFUND USER FEE.OVERPAYMENT 114010 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL 333.791.11 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.6-11-90 fIl ..119811 _ _ 1 pNUESi ENVIRONMENTAL A_L. CO_, flr}1;.@g _._ _ _ MECHANICAL PARTS- _,___ = IIA612 - INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS /920.05 CONNECTORS 114813 INGRAN PAPER 92011.31 OFFICE SUPPLIES w _ ISM! _. INTERNATIONAL.. 6USIN955__MA51f1f}}9.15 _.COMPUTER..PARTS_.__._. .___ .- 119615 WILLIAM H JACKSON f56.30 MEETING EXPENSE --1 119816 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUP► $612.66 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 11981T_ . _.__.__.AF. .49MNSON_ COMPANY_. ... _-_._.__- _________-7;04.27 _.___LA9 SUPPLIES_________ n 114519 KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITAL $9.315.B2 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 1 W 114919 KALLEL N COMPUTER PRODUCTS 3700.i9 OFFICE SUPPLIES gO 114E29. .. . . . .TAXER„CTNPAMY. .._ .___.-____ . .- .. _ .._. _._.---.-.1}9•6i BUILDINMATERIALS SERVICES 219B22 THE NBEAR COMPANIES $2.545.09 ENGINEERING SRRVIC6S 5-36 119822 MINE BEARING INC i2r595.09 MACHINE SUPPLIES T__►UMP_ t _ NRSNINF $5,257,65 PUMP PARTS 1482i MARTIN K60DICK SR $2.963.22 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 19-1-2, I-�- 114825 LAB SUPPORT $2.562.51 TEMPORARY SERVICES 114826 _ LAUNORALANO OF 0 ANG E,- -__ f;S;.9Q _._ - REFUND U9BR.FEE OUR PATMENT uoii DRo "AT .N. - - -- 3100.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT ------ 119828 LE ROY CRANDALL L ASSOC S220.00 GEOTECMHICAL SERVICES - DIGESTERS 0 PLT 2 .-114829 . . _ __LIEBERT_,ASSOCIATES OF_ _._ 10A 12;�44_---_...... INSTRUMENT_PART -__ 119S3O JOHN LISC[ PUMPS INC S631.27 PUMP PARTS 114831 LOCAL AGENCY $250.00 LAFCO ANNEX PROCESSING FEE 114832_ COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ,. _ _ _ _ __,_. __. _,_fTQ.;g__, ____ PURCHASE,AGREEBEMT _ _ 11i8A MPS $969.23 -- -- PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVIOE9 ---- 119834 MACDONALD-SIEPHENS LAB - $400.00 TEST EQUIPMENT 119815 „ _ NACOMCO, _ - . -_, 919120 -REFUND AGREEMENT . IlA6]6 MAGIC CARPET MOTEL fIr11 M.SS REFUND USER PER OVERP__AYMENT 114837 MAGIC LIMP MOTEL f52B.23 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT _114638. _ MARVAC ELECTRONICS 512.3N - INSTRUMENT_SUPPLIBS___. HMO MATT - CHLOR INC $921.69 CHLORINATION PARTS 114840 SOUTH STAR S19.59 PHOTO SERVICES FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/29/93 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP03 COUNTY.SANITATION_DIS[AICT.S_QF_DBAUUE_000NTV-.,_____ ______ __..._. CLAIMS PAID 06/05/91 PDSTIN6 DATE 06/05/91 WARRANT tl0i_.__ VENDOR._._____-_.__._.__-. ABDUNF __ _----_DESC RIPTIDN 114841 RCMENNA ENGR 6 EQUIP 1283.09 PUMP PARTS 114042- __.RCNINLEY EQYI►MENT__ CORP_ 1}2fie4Q-_..________ PALLET JACA.___ _-...____..._.._-_.__-. 114843 MECHANICALHCHASTER-C SUPPLY CO S12$66.14 IOFFICENSTRUMENT` SUPPLIES 111041 MECN ANICAL DRIVE $V57ENE tS6.14 IECHANICAL PARTS __4€3_..TONP ANT___._______._.._.-.._.__ _I1L248.14____ __._ELECTRIC 114847 NINO MICROGRAPHICS METERMAGRAPHICSTCR INC f$57.28 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES I14040 MIND RICR 06R 1PMICS 437.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES „1146}8 ,,,_ _. _ MI SS I 3. OFFICE.$OPPLI E9 1148 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $15 .10 HARDWARE 1HB50 NITCWELL INTERATIONAL INC 15 9.22 PUBLICATION 111851,__, __ __._MLADEN,__SUNTISN .CONSTRNCTIDR._.__.__--_21.052.4T4.60.-_____ ._-__.___CONSTRUCTIDN_39-1c2_._...._.__. _. 114851 JAMES N MONTGOMERY f37.217.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES 114853 MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICES $235.05 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES __114851 __.. __. . __NATIONAL.RSsT.RIN4TER_DANR_—_-----�7Ba1[6.4}—_.____--_LATTER 4F.SRCOIT_FRE =1990. SERIES-A __ 114855 NEAL SUPPLY CO $498.00 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 214656 CI7T OF NEWPORT BEACH $6.05 WATER USE m 114e57..________eNAR LES_._RIENDL;..._ __ —J621.P __—TRAVELI._NSETING_STUDER = 114859 NORTH SUPPLY ft25.03 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT H 114859 NORTHWEST MOTOR WELDING INC $60.19 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT bU_.111660__. _ __ DI_ CORPORAT ION. Y/2.355.13 _____ LAB-EQUIPMENT_I-9.1-9-91.._....___ . 114661 O-BRIEN ENERGY SYSTEMS $16.346.49 INTERIM POWER GREEN. DIST. M.0.3-8-09 114062 ON SYSTEMS CO $13.661.91 CHLORINE M.0.2-14-90 n_1149LINE__ELECTRONICS SSRP-ANY _ 613➢.LB _ ELECTRIC _ 1 114665 ON-LINE ELECTRONICS 1103.17 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES r 114863 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPL f94.61 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES FITTING C HYDROCHLORIC-ACID 114960 OXYGEN VALVE L FI T71M6 CO. $1.861.05 VALVES/FITTINGS 114B6B OXYGEN SERVICE 41.861.05 SPECIALTY GA988 COUNTY 1F_ 214.225.20 _ _SON2TRQCT79N_RASENBNT- 114570 CSOOC SELF-FUNDED MEDICAL I $100.000.09 PREMIUM ADVANCE 1I41171 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $2.719.16 REIMBURSE WOREERS COMP INSURANCE FUND ..114E it COUNTY IF .ORANGE T. ERA J.l Q.Q40.QQ_._._._ PERMITS__.__-_____._.__ 114973 PCL PACKAGING $379.50 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 314074 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY 11.143.34 PUMP PARTS PACIFIC___M061LE._OFEICES_____.._,____ A332.04_. ___TR$116R__LBVELING_ __ 110676 PACIFIC PARTS fl•S91.BO INSTRUMENT PARTS 114877 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO $531.11 SAFETY SUPPLIES _11}678 _._ . ....PACIFIC .SCL.HTLLAER-.TECH 01_.. ..._._ 321 a23 RSPDND_USER_FEE_OVERPAYMENT 114879 PACIFIC BELL $956.67 TELEPHONE SERVICES 114680 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $202.82 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS ,.jl46Bl.._.... _._ . PEEBLES3_ .YIPIN6,_MATERIA6S-_C. ______1619.23_ —_JANTTORIAL SUPPLIES _ 114882 PITNEY BOWES 9191.90 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 314003 POLYMETRICS. INC. $469.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLYPURE INC__ _ .-. ,_____ .__,____-. 15.075.19__— _.._.FATIONIC_POLYMER M.0.3-11- 77 II4885' POWER ELECTRO SU_PPLY CO $120.98 ELECTRIC PARTS 114806 PRECISION CONTROLS INC 9599.71 MECHANICAL PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5129/91 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY. $ANITATIOH.QIST91C1S_OF_ORAN6E COUNTY .__._._-_.._... [LAIRS PAID 06/OS/91 POSTING DATE 06/05/9I 114997 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE 136.0D ICE TNE.PRDJECT SOLUTION$.CO. _. . ..__...__...._ -_.___3 Sr Of 0.00 .._..__. INSTRUMENTATION INSPECT;4H.1l,.4.S_:B�B_-. 114889 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS 111050.24 ELECTRIC MOTORS 114090 R4010 SNACK $1r559./3 RADIO SUPPLIES f900.00_._ --__-PAVSB.AREA_SBEBPINCI-___ 214992 RA REED ELECTRIC f394.99 MOTOR REPAIR I14893 REEVES REF/E METATE INC $31.54 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT Ilia?!_....__ . . .. .REM.EDT_ TEMP __.._ _.... ...._._.__.._ _ __ $1.372.15 ____-_TSMPORARY.SERVICES_- .-__._ 114895 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO $2.052.81 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 1If096 J R ROBERTS CORP f24.384.60 CONSTRUCTION J-23-1 NOTO-ROOTER SERVICLI3LUNDING ____6120.00 ___-.PLUHBING.SEBVICBB_.___ 114699 ROSEMOUNT/UNILOC $149.44 INSTRUMENT PARTS 114999 JOSEPH T RYERSON ■ SON IN $2.352.40 HARDWARE _111200__._. ..__. SAFETY-WEN _„G49L„ __.___._.__.._.__._fI9.lB____ - . -__._._.__. PARTS_CLEANER.._ 114991 SAFETY SUPPLY OF AMERICA $951.27 SAFETY SUPPLIES 114902 SANTA Ft BAG CO $211.62 BUILDING MATERIALS X . 111294 __. . . _ . . .5ANWO SANK__. = 114904 SCOT? SPECIALTY BASES INC 1597.37 RENTAL EQUIPMENT .+ 114905 SEA COAST OESIONS 51.659.12 OFFICE FURNITURE to ._111P0! .. ___. . __.CITY ..OF .SEAL BEACH..____.____ 114907 SEARS ROEBUCK S CO $78.22 TRUCK PARTS 114900 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $2,119.99 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES n _319204.___._.. _.__SLIDE _NASTEE__._.__. 1153.36__--_ _PRESENTATION AIDS._____ In 114910 SMITH-EMERY CO 16.191.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-31-09 114911 SOFA FACTORY INC STO.06 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 111212.._.. .. COMPUS6. _ INC. _._.. .... ._...._....__.__________f3lt.l4—.______..___. ..... COMPUTBR._SQFTNARE___._._,. 114913 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO 8213,846.49 POWER 114914 SO CAL GAS CO $13,321.51 NATURAL GAS _ 119214_.__ ___.SOUTHERN._COUNTIES__D1L_.CO-__--.-f1L320.l9 __JSISSBL_FUSL.__ _ 114916 SOUTHWEST DIVERSIFIED INC $4,733.01 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 114927 SOUVENIR PHOTO $14.92 PHOTO SERVICES ...119219 _. WESTALLOY _INC _.._.__...______....._ _.JB33.66___._._.._ 114919 STAR TOOL A SUPPLY CO - $1,414.91 TOOLS 114920 STEVENS METAL FINISHING $495.46 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT ._111121_ . _____.. SUPELCO .INC 114922 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $195.96 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 114923 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL INC $5.157.64 TOOLS _171921.. . . . #CEO SN19L.IRc . .. . . ...... . ....._. .._.. .. . ._-----_-$12.2L_____-...._.._-._.OFFICE 114925 TCN ASSOCIATES $790.98 LAB SUPPLIES 114926 TRW INFORMATION SERVICES 11.31`9.86 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT . I1192T ._ . . TANBER .ELECTRONICS __. . .. .. . . ..___..._._ .._ 92/7.12___._.__-__.___.__. FREIGHT_..__-_._---..__ 114928 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG COMPANY 11342.f2 ELECTRIC CART PARTS '1t4929 TAYLOR INDUSTRIAL SOFTWARE $3,500.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE .111930 _. . _ ARMAN_. COMPANY.. . 114931 THLD-TELLO-SUSCH INC f9F4.89 CABLE 114932 THOMAS FISH COMPANY 11235.00 LAB SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/29/91 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBEI AP43 .... ._..COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF. OR/NGE_COUNTT-___ . ___.. CLAIMS PAID 06/05/91 POSTING DATE 06/05/91 _.VENDOR._. ___._ _____._-. . 162UNT--.__._--_.__.- __DESCRIPTION 114933 THOMASON MECHANICAL CORP 91.664.00 FITTINGS . 119934 .. .. THOMPSON INOUSTRIAL.EUPPIT_....... .___ _....._.___-.-._f16f.79.______.___.. _.._ HARDWARE . 3493 FINE PC INSULATION 565. BUILDING MATERIALS 134936 TINE MOTION TOOLS fIS0.5451 MMPVTER REP PARTS ._31493L___.. ___TRANSH. LOCK . 6._SIEL.SERVICE ..-_ --__-__._f1$243J1_._...--- __ _. ..__POMP REPAIRS- __.. 114939 TRAMSYA T TRI INC $196.80 PUMP PART 114944 TRAVEL ICE_TRAVELCO - f146.00 TRAVEL EERUICPS M.0.6-13-90 314941 __ .. . . .. NO . TRIL[.. C ... .... .... . .... .-_._.. .._ ___._ __S216.19 __._ ._._. -. . IINDOW TN`ECLEARING RIPPLIEB. ...._. . . 114942 TE TRUCK TRIPPI f075.00 WINDOW CLEANING 114942 TRUCK 6 AUTO SUPPLY INC f321.46 TRUCK PARTS _114947__. ._-. . JP_.TUCKER.. .I-.s01._ _ ___1 .16- - - -INSTRUMENT SUPP LI88__ 11494 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 225. PARCEL SERUIC¢8 114945 YYR SCIENTIFIC f1.282.14 LAS SUPPLIES _-114946----.----- -..VALLEY_.CI TI E8 _.EUPILY_ CO__ ____.__--_..--.-f5.395.70---._-_--- .__---PLUMBING SUPPLI83.__ _.-- 114947 ROSEMOUNT MT INC $2.622.56 MCCHANIPLI SUPPLI88 In 114940 VIKING ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS f2.621.16 LAB SUPPLIES 114949_._.._....__ WEATHER INOUSTRD INSTRUMENTS ._-_- _.-._.---.-51.604.51.----.--. -.--SAFETY SUPPLI83.__— CC 114930 VEST S WINO INSTRUMENTS f150.61 SAFETY SUPPLIER i-r 116952 YES7 COSTA TERMINALS INC f1B0.00 OFFICE .ACHING REPAIR 114953 ..... .. _ROURKE .9 WOODRTES MEtlICAL.-SUPILT__. _ -_._S31.95b60---.-----__ LEGAL C.SERVICES 0.6-9e90 __________-. 114954 ROURM[ 0 WOODRUFF f62.937.75 LOGAL. SERVICES M.O.10-10-90 114954 GEORG CORP f3.T9/.75 COPIER LEASES C .114955._._ -... --_.6EERETT TARO LEY CO--_.. 69501.-- 1 iN l56 W[R[7T N TORK CO ----06 MECHANICAL PARTS --- TOTAL CLAIMS P610 06103/91 64.502.103.S9 Lf II6 9 SUMMARY AMOUNT - --41 OPCR FUND .. . _ __.. ._..__. .._._ __.__.. _ .-f7,917-12_.__ .___..__-_.. __-_.-__. 42 OPER FUND $26,994.91 42 CAP FAC FUND - $1.771,120.88 .__43..OPER FWD - -. ...._-_._ __ $37...17031 45 OPER FUND $7,775.22 05 CAP FAC FUND $1,179.80 -. .46 OPER FUND 47 OPER FUND $17,393.87 47 CAP FAC FUND $49,470.25 ._--411 OPEN FUND. 013 OPER FUND $290.49 014 OPER FUND $4,452.65 . .414 CAP FAC FUND 0566 OPER FUND $1,732.67 4667 OPER FUND $3,901.10 - - 07614 OPER FUND _. _ _.. ._-_.-_ ___j3,9O7.62_.._-______._____ __..- JT OPER FUND $541,500.44 CORF $522,264.39 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS _ _. - _ . .__. ... ____-...__._.__0113,126.96-.____-____._____...____.__.. .__—__.___._ ___ JT RKING CAPITAL-- ---- Q,470 499II to C. ( . FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST VOPKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/13/91 PAGE I REPORT NUMBER AP.3 .. _ . .... ._.___ _ .. .. . .. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY . . . CLAIMS P410 06/19/91 POSTING DATE 06119/91 NMAANT.NP.._......._._......__VENDOR._-__._._ . . . . _.A43UNT- . DESCRIPTION ..._ ____.. 214986 AEE ENERGY BOOKS 5927.90 PUBLICATION $600.00 PUMP VIBRATION TESTING .. .. . 114988 ADAMSON UNIFORM A EQUIP 51.931.11 LAB SUPPLIES 214989 THE ADVANCE GROUP $77.84 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES ._11A99 Q_ _ - .... .__AOVA yCQ_COyi TAUS i9A5__1 NC_ _ S1,116.662.40 CONSTRUCTION P1-34-2 A 3 ___ ...._... 114991 AIR COLA SUPPLY INC S46.21 AIR CONDITIONING PARTS 114992 AIR PRODUCTS A CHEMICAL IN $16,174.00 O&H AREEMENT-OXY GEN SYST M.O.0-9-89 114993 _ ALHAMBRA__FOUNDPL_f0.._LTD ;8.112.y0 MANHOLE COVERS 11A999 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 224.25 ASPHALT 114995 AMERICAN CABLING A COMM $222.60 COMMUNICATIONS SUPPLIES 11.4996 _SEALS._ _ .82.255.35 FITTINGS 119997 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOC. , S16.95 PUBLICATION 114998 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION 91.233.40 EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIRS DIST 5 111999 . ._. _ _ 3LA5E_P__ANDER so"_ _. _ . . ;707.2i MEETING & TRAVEL EXPENSES 115000 ANll7Ep - DISTRIBUTION $832.02 COMPUTER PARTS 115001 A-PLUS SYSTEMS S1.233.80 NOTICES & ADS X _...115002. ._ _. _._.A9p[EA S€PYISE3.__1yG___. . {A SS 2.B4. . UNIFORM RENTALS 116003 ARIZONI INSTRUMENTS CORP it•362.25 METER r=. 315004 ASSOC. ADMIN15. A CONSULTANTS $60.00 MEDICAL CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR W .._l10005 . DENTAL_LNSumcc Co SULLA_..-.._. . _. _.. . . _ $12.0D __ CONSULTING SERVICES - DENTAL INS 115006 AREA $1.095.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 115007 - AUTOCON INDUSTRIES INC S2.227.29 ELECTRIC PARTS CAI—- 1151191_._._ FAL0Mf --aISP.QSRL-SERVILE-.____.-___._.__...__. SI12.993.20. __ __ . _. RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.7-13-08 1 115009 GLORIA BALUT $1.200.00 TEMPORARY SERVICES 115030 BANK OF AMERICA 5969.25 BANK CARDS 315913.._. .. "... . PY__9AA4TLLAND_ASSQ4-__ ._ _ . .. _..;3.380.00 . CONSTRUCTION PI-3M-2&3, J-21, 115012 BASMAW $1.000.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 115013 B BATEMAN $555.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION ._115014 _. .._ -.BAAIEB_QIA6MQSIIGS..LNG J2.513.82._- .___ _ __ _ _ _ LAB SUPPLIES_._ 115015 ROBERT BEIM WILLIAM FROST 2193.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-74 115016 BELL PIPE A SUPPLY CO 239.62 PIPE 145017 YT. .BILLARO-ING"_.._.__. . ... S116.39 TRUCK PARTS ... .. __ . 115UIS BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $396.32 RADIATOR REPAIRS 115019 BON-A-RUES 2211.88 TRUCK PARTS 1150to _ ._. B0NNEYILLE__E9UIP lNC-.___... .. ..;4.599.00 CRANE CERTIFICATION 115021 BOOT BARN $95.09 SAFETY SHOES 115022 - BOYLE ENGINEERING COOP $31.552.P4 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-17, 7-11 115023.. @RINDEp19N_ CORP_.. __ _ . . $661,171.00 CONSTRUCTION J-19-2 115024 BRISTOLITC SKYLIGHTS S451.04 SKYLITE - ROOF REPAIRS _ 115025 BUILDERS EMPORIUM SISY.B7 HARDWARE .._115026 ._ _. _. BURKE.._ENGIN€ERIN9__59__.. .__. ._ .. _. _ .. _ S93S.76 _. _ ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 115027 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES INC $9.702.08 SURVEYING SERVICES-REB 86-71 --' 125028 GARY G STREED $949.08 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 115029 _ 0Y[LBRRAACfl_ .COMPANY._._...._._..... _ ._.. S963.98 OFFICE SUPPLIES _ 115030 CEM CORPORATION $119.04 LAB SUPPLIES 115031 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. - $1.023.46 LAB SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - J7 DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/13/91 PAGE 2 REPOR ._ . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGECOUNTY NUMBEi 4v93 CLAIMS PAID 06/19/9l POSTING DATE 067I9I91 WARRANT,.NOY ._.. . _. YLNQLR__ .. _ AMOUNT._ . _. OESCSI-TION 115032 CALTROL INC S4.767.77 INSTRUMENT PARTS 115 D33.._ ._.. .-.._JOHN..-R__CALAPRICE--END-__.- .. . _ 922.197.61 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.1-14-90 115034 CALIFORNIA PANEL f VENEER $363.38 BUILDING MATERIALS 115035 CARLETON ENGINEERS S230.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.0.5-9-90 _ . If5036.___.__.__.CENTURY_PAIYI__---_.__. _.._ ___-__ _--_.._ _..__f121.B9 PAINT SUPPLIES 115037 CHEVRON USA INC $7.197.71 OIL 6 GREASE 115038 CHROME. CRANKSHAFT INC 1360.01 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 115934 . ... ... .._..COMPRESSOR_COMPONENTS._.OF...CA . . S702.90 MECHANICAL PARTS _ 115040 CONNELL GM PARTS T DIV S212.63 TRUCK PARTS - 115041 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $5.589.11 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES I15092. .. ._. . ....CONTINENTAL_.CHEMICAL-CO_.. ...._ $8.466.15 CHLORINE 115043 CONTINENTAL LAB PRODUCTS $1.311.10 LAB SUPPLIES - 115094 CONTRACTORS BOOK STORE $139.17 PUBLICATIONS ..115095 ..__. -_.CONTROL_..OESI6N�UPPLT..__-...._.._... _-. .. 1157.00 _ ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 115046 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 C S2.095.27 SOIL SAMPLING - _ -- 115097 CONVEYOR COMPONENTS CO f5-,232.92 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES m115Q9L_--._..._-GDE TA-.tlLAA_AVID-SU[PL T.-___-_. _- ... __._._...._1111.18 TRUCK PARTS I1504q COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $360.53 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES ►=i 115050 CHEMICAL PROCESSORS INC S2.996.76 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES CC 115001 .. . .__GUST.OM,_TUBW -REBUILDING._ -.- -. .. _. f713.79 TRUCK PARTS 115052 CAL POLY KELLOGG UNIT $5.000.10) OCEAN MONITORING INSTRUMENT - I150S3 DA 1L 1' PILOT, S199.00 NOTICES 6 ADS 115059 ._ ....-._ DAME5_911QORE___..-,.__.- ... ._. _...._ __$18.506.00 - CONSULTING SERVICES - EARTHQUAKE 1 115055 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE S1.518.07 TIRES N 115056 TON DAWES $562.50 MEETING 6 TRAVEL EXPENSES 115057.._ DF_l029__SOBP.98 ATIO TI___-._. -__.... -_ -_.. .. _. $156.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 115050 DECRA.TRENO $4,526.25 PAINT SUPPLIES 115059 DE GUELLE 6 SONS GLASS CO $036.32 GLASS .-_115069 -_,-_JIEW_PAR-3ALE3_L_SIRYICE__--_ -_._ _._..- _ .61.115.28._ ..._ TOOL 115061 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES 21.349.72 - --- PRINTING- � --- - - - -- --- - ---- 115062 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $95.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 115067_.. . . . -- --_DUNRE6_.BR43._J1A Ctl__MQYI N6... -. - . . ... $322.92 . _ SPACE RENTAL J-19A 115064 BUSH EDWARDS COPP S6.120.93 PAINT SUPPLIES - 115065 OVALS SALES S55.11 FITTINGS ._ 110006. -. _ ._. LA6iM6tl-1MC--.._-.__._ _. _ _ _. ._. $4.664.30 ._. OFFICE SUPPLIES 115067 FACILITIES SUPPORT CO $250.65 FITTINGS 115069 HOT INSTRUMENTS f CONTROL 9134.90 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 115769 _ MRRSNRLL._FA 18996. .. . _ .JI73.98 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION _ 115070 JOHN B FALKENSTEIN PE $3.201.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-9 115071 FEDERAL EMPRESS CORP S1S9.25 AIR FREIGHT __11597$ ...-. __...-FLRRSLLGAS____ -.__-______-__. ___ -..___ $63.15-. . PROPANE 115073 FISCHER S PORTER CO S4.200.98 INSTRUMENT PARTS 115071 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO $359.97 LAB SUPPLIES 115075 . ,. . FLAT.-.1 - VERTICAL- CONCRETE_._- . .. _. ._.. 5143.50. _ CONCRETE CUTTING 115076 FLUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $136.66 PUMP PARTS - - 115077 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA ST6.99 FILM FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/15/91 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 .. _ _._ .._.._ _COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06119/91 POSTING DATE 06/19191 WARRANT NO. ..._ .. - VENDOfl__._____ .-. . . _ . .. A43UNT . DESCRIPTION . ._ 115078 CITY OF FOUNTAIN PALLET 19.2T1.19 WATER USE 115079 FOUNTAIN_ . VALLEY. PAINT . 82.136.75 PAINT SUPPLIES 115080 FOR ENTERPRISES 51.825.00 SAFETY CONSULTANT - 115081 FREDSON RV SUPPLY SS2.38 TRUCK PARTS 115262 _.FREEWAY_. IRUCK__PARES ._ -...._. _ .. _ 5911.99 TRUCK PARTS 115083 ARGENE FREY $71.16 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 115084 CITY OF FULLERTON - 160.19 WATER USE 115085 _ _GANAHL_.LUMBER f195.47 HARDWARE/LUMBER _ 115086 GARDEN GROVE SANITARY BIRTH 12.919.00 KONA SETTLEMENT DISTRIBUTION 115087 GARRATT-CALLANAN COMPANY 93,249.11 CHEMICALS . II5088 __ .. .__.GCN�OK IiE .PL1511C5-COEP_.___.. . ._. .. S249.10 PAINT SUPPLIES 115090 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO $1,137.31 INSTRUMENT SERVICES 115090 IONGEORGE LEECH I. ASSOCIATES $541.70 IRAINING EXPENSES SUPPLIER 11SD92 . _ ___._GIE _ICH-RITCfl .____. __. .. ,393.01 TRAINING ARTSREIMBURSEMENT_ _ 115092 G]CR Lit N-MITCNELL INC S10 J9].0] NBCHANICAL PARTS 115093 GOLDEN COAST SAWDUST PROD $6.272.82 SAWDUST X .. 115099_. _. _.___._.BOV:Sl EINANCE_OFEICE¢SJSSOC..___ __ .. ._. . .. ... .. 575.50 PUBLICATIONS = 115095 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $730.91 CAMERA 6 FILM I I15096 FRED A HARPER 51.960.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION _ . 115991 .._ _. __-HARRINGTON-INOUSTRIAL_PLASTI_. _. _ 5589.25 INSTRUMENT PART _ 315098 HATCH A KIRK INC 56.182.98 MECHANICAL PARTS IISU99 PL MAYN CO INC $1.297.35 FILTERS CO 115I00 _ .. ...___MEYLEV_J'ALK 1flO1OMPANY_. _.____ _ _ _ _ .1231.69 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 115101 MILT] INC $276.90 TOOLS - W 115102 MINES WHOLESALE NURSERIES 1949.60 GROUND COVER 115103 ._ HI_.STANDARD_AUTOMOTIVE. . _ 1972.80 TRUCK PARTS II5109 NOERRIGER CVS CALIF INC 51.995.11 MECMIUNICAL PARTS 115105 ODNALD 0 NONONICHL 9300.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION I15106 _ _._._U.7._RDRVAIM_A_ASSOC­ __.___. __.._ __ 52.95S.D0 _ CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-2I 1, J-7_-9__ 115107 HOUSE OF BATTERIES $311.29 BATTERIES - - - 115108 AS HUGHES CO INC 35.851.15 SAFETY SUPPLIES I15109 . .HUNTER_CORPORATION ___. _ . - .. 6177.596.10 CONSTRUCTION J-i9-I 115110 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH - $15.47 WATER USE 115111 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCMWINN C $135.78 BICYCLE PARTS 115112 .__ IEEE._SERVICE__CENIER _._Cfli.. . 5595.96. PUBLICATIONS 115113 INACOMP COMPUTER CENTERS A6.999.50 COMPUTER HARDWARE 115114 ISCD INC 120.8S2.53 SAMPLER EQUIPMENT : 115115 . IMPERIAL_ WEST.._ CHEMICAL .. _ S58.137.79 _ FERROUS CHLORIDE M.0.4-11-90 315116 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $664.02 CONNECTORS 115117 INFORTENT SYSTEMS. INC. $5,515.63 SERVICE AGREEMENT . 11511E INGRAM. PAPER -- _ _ _ ._ .. 97.374.71 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 115120 INTERNATIONAL TIME RECORDER NORS 500.00 SERVICE AGRNT, EMENT CASE 1151,21 IRTL UNION OF OPERATING DISTRICT $2.SOO.PO SETTLEMENT, CASE 566658 115122 IRVI NCREDITCH. RATER ..DISTRICT 535.95 HATER USE 115123 JLA CREDIT CORP ,071.95 MICROFICHE READER LEASE 115123 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP lIr091.05 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCCSSING DATE 6115191 P46E . REPORT NUMBER APRS ._. .. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06119/91 POSTING DATE 06/19/91 WARRANT .NO. ____.__..___VE SO 0 R_._ _. .. __ ._. . .. _ . . AMOUNT OESCAIPTION 115124 JAYS CATERING 1745.75 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSES 115125 .. XALLEEN•S COMPUTER PRODUCTS 9823.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 115126 KANER COMPANY S319.70 HARDWARE 115127 RAS SAFETY PRODUCTS fS I.OA SAFETY SHOES .1151211__. _ .. ___XELLEY_-BLUE-SOOX--_--_ - S124.00 SUBSCRIPTION 315129 KING REARING INC SR.291.38 MACHINE SUPPLIES 115330 KLEINFELDER 19.919.83 GEOTSCHNICAL SERVICES _ 115131 MARTIN._KORDICX._.SR $2.651.26 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 19-1-2, I-9. 115132 LIFECOX-SAFETY SERVICE SUPPL f940.45 SAFETY SUPPLIES 115133 MDS 5233.21 METER REPAIRS 115139 __ ._ ._MPS .._-_..--___.__ .. _ 9121.99 PHOTO SERVICES 115135 NACOMCO 520.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 215136 MANLEY•$ BOILER REPAIR CO. INC 110.907.31 BOILER REPAIRS 115137 _ _-_-_ MARSBALI JNDUSIRIAL_TECM _ . _ $709.00 VIDEO RENTAL 115130 MATT - CHLOR INC 1157.91 CHLORINATION PARTS !T1 115139 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 961.30 HARDWARE X .. 115190._. --BGSUREREN7._COMTROL-.SFS__INC . . _ .. . ._ 2265.75 INSTRUMENT PARTS _ _ _ __ ____ = 115141 CROMPTON METERMASTER INC 1839.43 INSTRUMENT PARTS 115142 MILLAR ELEVATOR SERVICE 19T2.S6 SERVICE AGREEMENT to__.115143 ._. .. SILVAUKEE_ELECTRIC-_TOOL- CDR .. . . _ . . . R4.12 _ TOOL REPAIR 115199 MINE SAFETY AFPLIANCES CO 15.5A2.51 SAFETY SUPPLIES 115145 NISCO $115.79 OFFICE SUPPLIES C" .115196 ._ _ __._RISSIONJSRASIYLSUPPLIES_._ __ - -_. _ _ _. _. _ 3162.39 _. . HARDWARE 1/5147 NI TCHELL INTERNATIONAL INC $110.76 PUBLICATION F 115190 MONITOR PURL ISNING CO 592.00 PUBLICATION 115149 . .JAMES- N_JIONTGONERY___-. .. . . 17.B22.93 - ENGINEERING SERVICES _ 115150 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES $650.00 LAB SERVICES 115151 MICHAEL 0 MOORE 1553.29 TRAINING 6 MEETING EXPENSES 115152._. -._. _NOTION..-ISOUSTEIES._1NC____._.__.. ._ . . __ .__. 2293.53 ._ _. __ MECHANICAL PARTS 115153 MOTOROLA INF INC 1951.69 RADIO PARTS 115155 NEC NATIONAL- NATION SYSTEMS f61.90 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 115156 - NATIONAL-INFORMATION._ OAIA C 191.00 PUBLICATION 115156 NATIONAL SANITARY SERVICES INC $72215.56 VACUUM TRUCK 36RVICES 115156 NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPLY 1 . JANITORIAL SUPPLIE9 115159 NOUSTEWA _.N_ELECTRONICS _CONS L. CO 21.336.313.22$2653 CONSTRUCTION P1-33 115160 NCVARS [FABRICA77O SY6.53 COMPUTER PART 115161 NU-WEST AVILIONIINT .005.53 PIPE SUPPLIE9 315162 OFFICE. P MINORITYI NTERIOR RES 11.005.53 OFFICE FURNITVRB 115163 OFFICIAL MINORITY REVIEW 1395.00 NOTICES 6 ADS I1516] DR SYSTEMS CO 199•i29.91 CNLORINB M.0.2-19-90 . 115164 _.QLYRPIC__TERhIRAL.. COMPANY _ _.15.934.13 CHEMICALS 115165 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPL f34.4R ELECTRIC SUPPLIE9 115166 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C $323.59 TRUCK PARTS 115167 _ _ ORANGE COUNTY._.CHEMICAL ._CO _ _.. _. 11.631.20 .. HYDROCHLORIC ACID _ IIS160 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY C 5151.77 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 115269 ORANGE VALVE 9 FITTING CO. $49.83 LAB SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - J7 DIST WORKING CAPIIAL PROCESSING DATE 6113/91 PACE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY _ CLAIMS PAID 06/19/91 POSTING DATE 06/19/41 .WARRANT. NO*._.._ ___-...____.YENQDR_-------..__._...."..." ". AMOUNT .. . .. . DESCRIPTION 115170 OXYGEN SERVICE S1.905.28 SPECIALTY OASES 1151T1 ..__ .._. COUNiI__DE.,..QPeRGC.____. . "_.. _.... $3.469.00 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES 115172 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $7.553.21 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE 315173 PSSI 9738.00' T.V SEWER SERVICES __PACIFU SAFETY._S9QIPRENL.."CQ.. .61,563.95 SAFETY SUPPLIES 115175 PACTEL CELLULAR S97.67 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES - - 115176 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $1.642.92 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS MIT? ,", PALMIE9IR_T ILCM S_.VIENLRA. ..., t11ITT.1Q LEGAL SERVICES - OIL WELLS M.O.12-12-90 119175 PATTEN C04PI TAYLOR INSTR S330.06 CHARTS 119179 PEAT MARWICK MAIN S CO 91,478.40 AUDITING SERVICES . 415100 ". __._. "SIEVE-PCLL[[ICR.__.. _.._ _ . . . _. .... H50.61 REPLACEMENT WARRANT 115101 ROT PENDERGRAFT $450.90 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION ' 115182 PICKWICK PAPER $274.05 JAT{ITORIAL SUPPLIES 210383... ....... ...PIOA__.6BO_SYSTEOQ"JNC._.__._.. ._. . . S69.692.13 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88 115104 PLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE $166.15 HARDWARE 115395 PGLYPUPE INC $17,175.48 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-87 ITT>c 115106._____Pool LYE_EDRRULATQBSA_INC._.._.___.__ . SSS2.I0 GROUNDS KEEPING SUPPLIES 2 .. ..._..._. . . .. 115187 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO $53.96 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES o--i 115188 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE 9133.04 ICE NE .PROJEET. EOL UIlORS_C Q. -"_. _. ._ .. - . . . . HA9B0.01) INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O._8-8-88 113190 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO $1.174.90 TRASH REMOVAL --"- "'- 115191 RECTC INC 842.914.17 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.7-11-90 W.....115192_...........PBC"DRP_1 RECLINE_TNT —_..-____. _.___. __4186.00._." _... STREET SWEEPING 1 11519 RED CO INC 51I2.62 FREIGHT N 118194 WING RED WING SHOES $190.54 SAFETY SHOES 115195_ ......._RA REGAIN 0._..CLCC TA IC.__._. . .__ . _ .. ..... . . N$374.40 .. ELECTRIC REPAIRS SERVI II5196 REGAIN {3H•f0 CONSULTING SERVICES 115197 REMEDY TEMP $1,245.81 TEMPORARY SERVICES 115190 ..._.._.".ACMQIC__NETEB-RESCITING_ SYSt - . _. .. ... ._.. ._."t71000.00_- - POSTAGE 115199 ADRIANA RF.NESCU {Y9.67 MEETING S TRAVEL EXPENSED_ 115200 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO 91,049.15 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 1152P1 J--R__RQBERT S...._____. . .._. .__ ._ tR0R172T.Q0. CONSTRUCTION J-17 _ 115202 J R ROBERTS CORP $216,605.40 CONSTRUCTION J-23-3 " 115203 GEORGE ROBERTSON 0597.00 TRAINING 6 MEETING EXPENSES . III52Qf .. .._.AQBIRSDR-6ERTIL ILCR " EQ" .. _.. __ . . .. {192.36 _ CHEMICALS ' - TRAINING MEETING EXPENSES IIS206 RICHACL POIENGUR7 $5A1.00 119Y06 PE44T RUPP {515.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 115207 . 139 . PARTSPUMP 11520 SAFETY-MLEEN CORP $199.90 PARTS CLEANER 1152 9 SAFETY SUPPLY 0i AMFRICA {1,{36.99 SAFETY SUPPLIES .15230, . . . _ _ ," REER IRA...INC_: ENGINEERING SERVICES 115211 DOUG BARYIS 1330•20 TPAININC A MEETING EXPENSES . ...._.".. . 115212 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT•L S34.942.20 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-13-90 _ 1155I3 ._ .. .. . SCOTT CQBPANY._. -_._..__...._ " . t121206.110 LAB TRAILER SET-UP M.O.11-I4-90 115214 WENDY T SEVENANOT $200.01 TRAINING A MEETING EXPENSES 115215 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $4.616.43 HARDWARE/TOOLS FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/I 3/91 PAGE 6 REPORT NUHREI AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY - CLAIMS PAID 96/19/91 ►OSIIN6 DATE 06119/91 WARRANT N0. ._.. _ YCtlQOR _ _ _. AMOUNT. . DESCRIPTION 115216 SHEPHERD MACHINERY CO 9139.56 TRUCK PARTS 115217 SHURELUCK_-.SALCS_____ __ 1359.56 TOOLS 115210 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO $60.86 CHEMICALS 115219 SKYLINE DISPLAYS $5.329.26 BUILDING MATERIALS _.115220. $70.00 _ PHYSICAL EXAMS _ 115221 COMPUSA. INC. $146.06 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 115222 SO CALIF BOILER. IYC $757.99 BOILER REPAIRS 115223— ...__-SOU7HERN__CAL3E_EOISON-..CO___ _ 13S.I87.93 POWER _ 115224 $0 CAL GAS CO $1.519.39 NATURAL GAS 115225 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO 61.256.91 DIESEL FUEL _.. 115P26.. .__..—_.29UVENIR_PIID.TO —.__ ___. _.. __. __ _. 596.66 PHOTO SERVICES 115227 SPARKLETTS DRINKIVG WATER 12.J79.59 WATER/COOLER RENTALS 115228 STAMEN 2 SPASSOFF PE 15.120.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-34-2 _. 115229_. .__ ---NESTALLOY_INC - $534.66 WELDING SUPPLIES 11523 SPIRAL BINDING CO INC 12 . OFFICE SUPPLIES 115231 JAMCS STA NFILL CONSTRUCTION f10.260P0.8000 CONSTRVCTION MODIFICATION - J-7-0 ITT _,115272... STAB__J QOL—R_SOPP.LIL_EO._ - . S693.73 TOOLS X 115233 STERLING ART $45.02 ART SUPPLIES rv=-I 125234 SUMMIT STEEL 9773.99 METAL Cif . .115235._ _...-__ _.SUAER_.CHEN_C 48E____._. .. ... . - _ . -$124.20 PAINT SUPPLIES 115236 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL INC $4.493.65 TOOLS ---� 115231 SWIFT JEEP EAGLE $14.738.00 AUTOMOBILE py -_115230.._._—_TAILOe CDV tltl_-11E6—C➢MPAtlY__.—__ _ . . .- _.__ __9315.66.. ELECTRIC CART PARTS_ I 115239 TEKMRR COMPANY . 1 . 0 LAB SUPPLI68 ON 1132q $2 IEKTRONI7 INC f29101.32 - VIDEO REPAIRS . .THOMPSON INDUSTRIATA L.______. __.$142.26 _ INSTRUMENT PARTS 115243 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 9156.35 LOCK HARDWARE 115203 TONY.S LOCK 1 SAFE SERVICE 5116.30 BUILDING ING YING MATE -__ RIALS J15245.__ ..--TRAFFIC INDUSTRIAL--- __..... . _. 1198.32__ . _ BUILDINGMATBERVIC 1157M5 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE INC 62.N9.09 TRAVEL SERVICES UIST 2 IISP A6 TRAVEL TRAVEL s2.127.00 TRAVEL SERVICES M.O.6-13-90 115291 ,.. -TRVCtl__S_AUIO_SUP.PLT-._INC . . . $091.72 TRUCK PARTS 115248 UNOCAL f131.96 UNLEADED GASOLINE 115249 THE UNISOURCE CORP _ $215.35 OFFICE SUPPLIES _ .. 11525A.-.. __. UNITEO._PARCCL_S[RY.lGE.__ _... _. .. ,.._ - _—f175.65 . . PARCEL SERVICES 115251 VOC TESTING $773.P0 EMMISSIONS TESTING 115252 VYR SCIENTIFIC S5.139.02 LAB SUPPLIES 115253 YALLET__C I TIES_ SUPPLY . CO $14.914.92 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 115256 VARIAN INSTRUMENT DIVISION 11.066.02 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 115255 VERTEX SYSTEMS $6,307.50 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 115256 _ . _ -WINING _INOUSER.IAL--SUPPLY._. .. __. .___..$612.01 __ PAINT SUPPLIES 115257 PON WADE 12035.62 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL - -- 115258 CARL WARREN A CO 1911.95 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 115259 VEIOH,TR9MI23..INC,. —.... . -_. - $175.13 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 115260 WESTAICS CARBON INC $4,366.80 CHEMICALS - 115261 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY 120.259.51 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-8-90 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPI7AL PROCESSING DATE 6/13/92 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 _._.COUNTY SANITATION DIS TS ICIS OF OS AN BE COUNTY CLAIMS P4ID 06/19/91 POSTING DATE 06/19/91 WARRANT.NO. __--_ VENDOR ___..__.__. ..._ --AMOUNT.-. . _ _ ... DESCRIPTION .._ 115262 WILCON IND S195.87 INSTRUMENT.PART 115263 .... ... WILLOAN_._ASSOCIATES..._—_ _ __ .... -- _ ... 110.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 115264 K-TREE CO $148.40 COMPUTER SOFTWARE - 115265 XEROX CORP 15.036.01 COPIER LEASES - ._ 115266_ .____.__...BEOMSE__Y1ROLEY10 _-__ __-. _—_ _._._ ._ _.. . 1940.4a VALVE 115267 BOB YOUNG ROOFING 19.352.50 ROOFING REPAIRS - 115268 2IEBARTH S ALPFR/C.S. ALPER S538.550.00 CONSTRUCTION P2-42-1 . 115261 ._ ..21ESARTN_AMO_ALP.ER._—. ..._._ _... 1100.159.04 CONSTRUCTION P1-34-1 115270 _ RICHARD B EDGAR 1200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION - ----------------- TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 0611/19/!1 15,650,615.96 3 m SUHHARI x r--, pl OPER FUND f259.83 02.OPER. FUND____. .$2,474•az 03 CAP FAC FUND ,60.00 � p3 OPER FUND i2121,670.80 bD__p3SAP. FAC.FUNO _—__. __.___.__...._._f4,il?.•49 . _.._ NS OPER FUND $5,086.31 -- - - - - --- ---- ---- - - V p5 CAP FAC FUND $103.23 16 OPER FUND___.._—.___ _--_..______ ._ .. .. _ . . _ . _4290.77 p7 OPER TOO $12,193.69 - - N7 CAP FAC FUND $5,659.80 .Mll 4PER WHO..__..___ _.46 692,91 All CAP FAC FUND - $3,050.29 - 413 OPER FUND $47.87 914 OPER FUND. . __—..._. . ... $27.42 _ #14 CAP FAC FUND $602.95 p566 OPER FUND $45.61 ' ._ 97614.9PER FUNO . .__..46.050.00_ .. . . _ _ _ .......__._.__—... JT OPER FUND $625,594.93 CORE $4,768,020.43 SELF.FUNDED IN$URANS6. !'UN-DS_____ . ..... ..._ . . . - _ _._ .. .18,336.26 - ... __.___.._ _.... JT WORKING CAPITAL $154,916.52 - ------------------- EXCERPT FROM THE MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA An adjourned regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m. , July 17. 1991, at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing participation in the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement That the Boards of Directors hereby creating the National Water adopt Resolution No. 91-129, approving Research Institute and authorizing participation in the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement creating the National Water Research Institute, between the Sanitation Districts, Irvine Ranch Water District, Orange County Water District, Municipal Water District of Orange County and San Juan Basin Authority; approving an annual contribution of $50,000 for Districts' share of the administrative budget of said Institute; and authorizing the Joint Chairman to appoint the Districts' representative to the Board of Directors of the �✓ Institute. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, RITA J. BROWN, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 60 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be a full , true and correct copy of minute entries of the meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 17th day of July, 1991. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 17th day of July, 1991. <Z;Ak�. Secretary of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 � b EXCERPT FROM THE MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA An adjourned regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m., July 17, 1991, at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 1991-9Z fiscalyear carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1991-92 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 18,368,000 Capital Facilities Fund 24,828,000 Construction Fund - 1986 2,620,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 19,834,000 TOTAL $ 65,650,000 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and unanimously FA rovin 1 1- fiscal year carried by roll call vote: udge That the District's 1991-92 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 49,266,000 Capital Facilities Fund 99,735,000 Construction Fund - 1986 4,690,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 57,780,000 TOTAL $211,471,000 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 1991-92 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1991-92 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 57,573,000 Capital Facilities Fund 95,281,000 Construction Fund - 1986 5,085,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 51,358,000 TOTAL $209,297,000 -1- 07/17/91 DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and unanimously A rovin 1991- year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1991-92 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in t1 following amounts: Operating Fund $ 13,239,000 Capital Facilities Fund 19,747,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 24,097,000 TOTAL $ 57,083,000 DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and unanimously pprovino 1991-92 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: . budget That the District's 1991-92 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: operating Fund $ 10,253,000 Capital Facilities Fund 13,572,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 9,262,000 TOTAL $ 33,087,000 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and unanimously ..� roving 91-92 fiscal .year carried by roll call vote: Mugger That the District's 1991-92 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 19,599,000 Capital Facilities Fund 39,559,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 22,793,000 Bond 8 Interest Fund - 1962 228,000 TOTAL $ 82,179,000 DISTRICT IS 11- fisca year Moved, seconded and unanimously roving budge carried by roil call vote: That the year budget be, and is hereby, received, Orderedfiled, 9 andapp ovedsinithe following amounts: Operating Fund Capital Facilities Fund $ 16,174,000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 13,697,000 Bond 8 Interest Fund - 1958 13,697,0oo 36' - TOTAL $ 51,459 000 -2- 07117191 DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 1 - 2 fisca year carried by roll call vote: +✓ butlget That the District's 1991-92 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in following amounts: Operating Fund $ 1,371,000 Capital Facilities Fund 13,079.000 Construction Fund - 1990-92 9,000 TOTAL $ 14,459,000 DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 1991-9z fiscal year carried by roll call vote: butlget That the District's 1991-92 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in i following amounts: Operating Fund $ 1,709,000 Capital Facilities Fund 9,964,000 TOTAL $ 11,673,000 ✓ STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, RITA J. BROWN, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S. 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of.Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be a full , true and correct Copy of minute entries of the meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 17th day of July, 1991. . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my. hand this 17th day of July, 1991. ecre$— tart' of he Boards of Directors Of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 -3- STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Adjourned Regular Board Meeting of Districts Nos. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 held on 191 was duly posted for public inspection at the main lobby of the Districts' offices on 19 '?/ . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this BAt day of 194L. Rita J. Hrown, Secretary o each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos . 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 of Orange County, California t o.w.I