Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-06-12 u,F.°""�" •� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 6127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 y in• 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7o18 (714)982-2411 June 5, 1991 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 WEDNESDAY, JUNE 12, 1991 - 7 : 30 P.M. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. secretary Tentatively-Scheduled Upcoming Meetings: BUILDING COMMITTEE - Thursday, June 20th, at 5: 30 p.m. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday, June 26th, at 5: 30 p.m. `V COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .1 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 10844 ELLS AVENUE - PO BOX 8127 FGUWAIN VALLEY,CALWORNIA 92728-k.10, 171432822.11 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings June Jun 12, 1991 Jun 26, 1991 July Jul 24, 1991 August Aug 14, 1991 None Scheduled September Sep 11 , 1991 Sep 25, 1991 October Oct 09, 1991 Oct 23, 1991 November Nov 13, 1991 None Scheduled December Dec 11, 1991 None Scheduled January Jan 08, 1992 Jan 22, 1992 III February Feb 12, 1992 Feb 26, 1992 V March Mar 11 , 1992 Mar 25, 1992 April Apr 08, 1992 Apr 22, 1992 May May 13, 1992 May 27 , 1992 June Jun 10, 1992 Jun 24, 1992 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127.10844 Ellis Avenu of Orange County,California Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone:(714)962.2411 JOINT BOARDS AGENDA REGULAR MEETING JUNE 12, 1991 - 7:30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954 .2, this agenda is posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2 ) Roll call ( 3 ) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) (5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. (6) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. (a) Report of Joint Chairman (b) Report of General Manager 'J (c) Report of General Counsel 6/12/91 (7) EACH DISTRICT ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the V following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman: District 1 - May 8, 1991 regular District 2 - May 8, 1991 regular District 3 - May 8, 1991 regular District 5 - May 8, 1991 regular District 6 - May 8, 1991 regular District 7 - May 8, 1991 regular District 11 - May 8, 1991 regular District 13 - May 8, 1991 regular District 14 - May 8, 1991 regular (8) ALL DISTRICTS Considers ion of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District. ) See pages "A" and "B" 5/08/91 5/22/91 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $1,124,105.02 $ 681,471 . 30 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 510,411 .79 4,628,931 .50 Joint Working Capital Fund - 215,947 .91 440,380.47 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 6,260.02 116,890.09 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 195. 34 -0- DISTRICT NO. 2 - 1,826 ,003 .84 30,862 .96 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 28,851 .66 18,131.44 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 1,564.82 26,402.63 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 133 .79 686.97 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 304,301 .22 31,427.72 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 30,149. 36 6,072.70 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 35.99 -0- DISTRICT NO. 14 - 1, 337 ,418.25 9,925. 37 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 6 6 JOINT - 1,756.59 351.65 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 6 7 JOINT - 2, 352.13 -0- DISTRICTS NOS. 7 6 14 JOINT - 5,075.97 2,054.91 $5, 394,563.70 $5,993,589.71 -2- 6/12/91 ( 9 ) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 9(a) THROUGH 9(t) �i All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. The Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: ../ ALL DISTRICTS (a) (1) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding Purchase of Thirteen (13 ) Each Four-wheel Electric Cargo Carriers, Specification No. A-152, to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company for a total amount not to exceed $54,600.00 plus sales tax. See page "C" (2) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding Purchase of Five (5) Each Four-Wheel Electric Personnel Carriers, Specification No. A-153 , to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company for a total amount not to exceed $18 ,000.00 plus sales tax. See page "D" (b) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation re Purchase of One (1 ) Combination High Pressure water and vacuum Sewer Cleaning Truck, Specification No. A-154; rejecting the bid of Sancon Engineering, Inc. as not meeting the specifications; and awarding said purchase to Haaker Equipment Company for a total r..e� amount not to exceed $232,610.00 plus sales tax. See page "E" -3- 6/12/91 (9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (c) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to General Oceanics, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $25,027.00, plus freight and sales tax, for purchase of One Rosette Multi-Bottle Water Sampler (Specification No. E-200) . (d) consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications for Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17, authorizing an addition of $34, 319.00 to the contract with J.R. Roberts Corporation for five items of additional work. See page .,F., (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1 , Job No. J-19-1, authorizing an addition of $11,436.00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation for one item of additional work. See page ..G. (f) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 11 to the plans and specifications for Gas Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-1, authorizing an addition of $14,968.00 to the contract with Ziebarth 6 Alper for five items of additional work. See page IHn (g) Consideration of the following actions relative to NPDES Ocean Monitoring Program required by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Staff Report and Recommendation for NPDES Ocean Monitoring Program Year Seven (1991-92) and Selection Committee Certification of the negotiated fee for Amendment No. 8 to Agreement with Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. 5-032 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) . (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 91-80, approving Amendment No. 8 to the Agreement with SAIC for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-Inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. 5-032, extending the contract from July 1, 1991 to June 30, 1992, for an amount not to exceed $1,856,923.00 for Year Seven of said contract. See page "I" -4- 6/12/91 (9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (h) Consideration of the following actions relative to Professional Services Agreements with the following firms for Surveying Services for various Collection System and Treatment Plant Projects, Specification No. 5-051: (1) (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee with Bush & Associates Inc. for said services. See page .,J" (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 91-81, approving a Professional Services Agreement with Bush 6 Associates Inc. for said services on an hourly-rate basis for labor including overhead, direct expenses and profit, plus supplies and materials, at cost, for a total amount not to exceed $75,000.00 for a one-year period beginning June 12, 1991, with provision for up to two one-year extensions. See page "X" (2) (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee with Clifford A. Forkert, Civil Engineer, for said services. See page "L" (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 91-82, approving a Professional Services Agreement with Clifford A. Forkert, Civil Engineer, for said services on an hourly-rate basis for labor including overhead, direct expenses and profit, plus supplies and materials, at cost, for a total amount not to exceed $75,000.00 for a one-year period beginning June 12, 1991, with provision for up to two one-year extensions. See page "M" ( 3) (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee with DGA Consultants, Inc. for said services. See page "N" (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 91-83, approving a Professional Services Agreement with DGA Consultants, Inc. for said services on an hourly-rate basis for labor including overhead, direct expenses and profit, plus supplies and materials, at cost, for a total amount not to exceed $50,000.00 y,/ for a one-year period beginning June 12, 1991, with provision for up to two one-year extensions. See page "0" -5- 6/12/91 9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) _ . (i) Consideration of the following actions relative to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design, construction support services and preparation of operation and maintenance manuals for Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43: (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for said services. See page "P" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 91-84, approving said agreement with John Carollo Engineers for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $1,914,805.00. See page (j ) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Vincent Truong dated May 8, 1991, for property damages in an estimated amount of $1,300.00 and for medical costs in an undetermined amount, allegedly caused by an automobile accident involving District vehicle, and refer to the Districts, General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. (k) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to employ a Source Control Manager at a salary above the mid-point of the salary range (currently $4,766 to $6,196 per month) for this position classification to head the Source Control Division in the Districts- Technical Services Department. (1) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to designate members of the Boards and/or staff to attend and participate in various training programs, meetings, hearings, conferences facility inspections and other functions which, in his opinion, will be of value to the Districts or affect the Districts- interests, including, but not limited to, those conducted by organizations providing specific training, state and federal legislative and regulatory bodies and the California Association of Sanitation Agencies, California Water Pollution Control Association, Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, and the Water Pollution Control Federation; and authorizing reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses in accordance with existing Districts- policies and the approved annual budget for 1991-92. -6- 6/12/91 (9 ) DISTRICT 2 - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (m) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Portion `./ of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue (including City of Anaheim Street Improvements) , Contract No. 2-26-3; Katella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street (Ninth Street) , Contract No. 2-28; and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29, authorizing an addition of $143,.363.00 to the contract with Steve Bubalo Construction Co. for five items of additional work. See page "R" DISTRICT 3 (n) Consideration of Resolution No. 91-87-3, approving Agreement with the Westminster Redevelopment Agency, electing a tax increment pass-through relative to Amendment No. 4 to Westminster Commercial Redevelopment Project No. 1, in accordance with District policy and pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33676. See page "S" (o) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding Purchase of Two (2) Each Variable Frequency Drive Units, Specification No. E-199, to Emerson Industrial Controls , for a total amount not to exceed $47,188.00 plus sales tax. see page "T" DISTRICT 5 (p) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with The Keith Companies for design and construction services required for the South Coast Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-35, and the Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36, to provide for additional design services for a landscaping plan for Crystal Cove Pump Station, as required by the California Department of Fish and Game. (q) Consideration of Resolution No. 91-88-5, approving agreement with the City of Newport Beach, relative to a cooperative project to construct raised medians along Pacific Coast Highway through Corona del Mar for the City in conjunction with Districts' Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-34-3, and providing for equal sharing of +o..✓ the cost of said medians. See page "U" -7- 6/12/91 (9) DISTRICTS 7 6 14 - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (r). Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Baker Force Mains, from Main Street Pump Station to Bristol Street, Contract No. 14-1-2, authorizing an addition of $7,600.00 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Co. , Inc. , for additional costs incurred to submit a separate performance bond required by John Wayne Airport Authority. See page "A" DISTRICT 7 (s) Consideration of the following actions relative to Campus Relief Sewer, between von Karman Avenue and Jamboree Boulevard, Contract No. 7-13: (1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of $54,355.63 to the contract with Albert W. Davies, Inc. , for one item of additional work, payment of bonuses for early completion in accordance with the provisions of the specifications, and granting a time extension of ten calendar days for inclement weather. See page "B" (2) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total deduction of $696.10 from the contract with Albert W. Davies, Inc. See page C. (3) Consideration of Resolution No. 91-89-7, accepting said contract as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "D" (t) Consideration of Resolution No. 91-90-7, approving Agreement with the Orange County Flood Control District, providing for reimbursement of costs to the Flood Control District for the relocation of Districts 8-inch VCP sewer siphon, in conjunction with OCFCD improvements to the E1 Modena-Irvine Channel between Browning Avenue and Red Hill Avenue within the City of Tustin, and authorizing payment of a $40,000.00 deposit for Districts- portion of said work. See page END OF CONSENT CALENDAR .(10) ALL DISTRICTS Cons�ra ion of items deleted from Consent Calendar if any -8- 6/12/91 (11.) ALL DISTRICTS Nom naa onsfor Joint Chairman (Election to be held at regular July Board Meeting) (12) (DELETED) (13) ALL DISTRICTS Cons era on of motion to receive, file and approve staff Summary Financial Report for nine-month period ending March 31, 1991 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) (14) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Report of the Executive Committee and Fiscal Policy Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committees' actions and written report of the meeting on May 22, 1991 (copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) . (b) Consideration of action on items recommended by said Committees: (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file the Committees' report and recommendations re 1991-92 personnel requirements and joint works operating and construction budgets. (2) Consideration of actions re personnel requirements: v..� (a) Consideration of motion approving 1991-92 personnel requirements. (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 91-86, amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, re 1991-92 personnel requirements. (3) Roll call vote motion approving proposed 1991-92 Joint Operating Budget Funds, as follows: Fund Total Amount Joint Operating/Working Capital $53,131,000 Workers' Compensation Self-Insured 257,000 Self-Funded Health Plan Trust 2,177,000 Public Liability Self-Insured 336,000 (4) Roll call vote motion approving proposed 1991-92 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget (CORF Joint Works Construction) in the total amount of $114,120.00. L� [ITEM (14) (b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 101 -9- 6/12/91 (14) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from Page 9) (b) (5) Consideration of motion authorizing and directing the Fiscal Policy Committee to evaluate proposals obtained by the Districts- insurance broker and to place Excess Workers' Compensation insurance coverage effective July 1, 1991; said action to be submitted to the Joint Boards for ratification or revision at the regular meeting on July 17, 1991. (6) Consideration of motion approving, in principle, the Minicomputer Hardware System and Network Master Plan (specific hardware/software determinations to be made by the Boards as each phase of the plan is considered for implementation) . (7) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Digital Equipment Corporation, in an amount not to exceed $567,000 plus tax relative to implementation of the first phase of the Minicomputer Hardware System and Network Master Plan, for purchase of a VAX 4000, Model 300, dual-host cluster computer system with fiber optic Ethernet Network. (8) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to VG Fisions, in an amount not to exceed $249,600 plus tax, for purchase of Laboratory Information Management System software to manage the large volumes of data handled by the laboratory and help comply with applicable regulatory requirements. (9) Consideration of motion approving Memorandum of Understanding between Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) and the Districts Governing Quality Control of Wastewaters Discharged to the Santa Ana Regional Interceptor with regard to EPA-5 pretreatment requirements for applicable dischargers within the SAWPA jurisdiction. (15) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Report of the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee's actions and written report of the meeting on May 30, 1991 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) . (b) Consideration of action on the following items recommended by the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee: (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Staff Report dated May 23, 1991 relative to acquisition of Rancho del Rio property from the County of Orange for use as a wastewater residuals composting site; declaring the site not to be a viable wastewater residuals management option; and directing staff not to pursue acquisition of the site. [ITEM (15) (b) CONTINUED ON PAGE Ill �•r� -10- (15) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 30) 6/12/91 (b) ( 2) Consideration of motion amending Board authorization �J of April S, 1987 re feasibility studies pertaining to joint water reclamation projects with the Orange County Water District (OCWD) , to authorize participation with OCWD and other appropriate public and private water and wastewater agencies relative to the feasibility of joint water recycling projects, and increasing the total authorized amount from $100,000 to $250,000 for the Sanitation Districts, share of said studies. ( 3 ) Consideration of motion authorizing issuance of Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 50395 to MacDonald Stevens Engineering, increasing the maximum authorized amount from $25,000.00 to $28,000.00 for engineering services pertaining to the Crescent Basin Feasibility Study. (16 ) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion authorizing the Director of Finance to certify claims and forward to the Orange County auditor for immediate payment for expenditures incurred after June 30, 1991, and declaring that such certification shall comply with the provisions of Resolution No. 76-10 pertaining to procedures for payment of claims against the Districts until the 1991-92 budgets are adopted by the respective Districts. ( 17) ALL DISTRICTS Closed Session: During the course of conducting the usine�ss s—eT—Forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards, the Chairman may convene the Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956 .9 or 54957 .6 . Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employee compensation; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as final actions are taken by the ,Directors on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary (b) Reconvene in regular session �i (c) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session. -11- 6/12/91 (18) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (19) DISTRICT 1 other and communications or supplemental agenda items, 1f any (20) DISTRICT 1 Consi eration of motion to adjourn (21) DISTRICT 2 other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (22) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn (23) DISTRICT 3 Other and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (24) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (25) DISTRICT 5 Ott iness and communications or supplemental agenda Stems, if any (26) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (27) DISTRICT 11 OE er—business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (28) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn (29) DISTRICT 13 Ot�-gu—siness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (30) DISTRICT 13 Consieration of motion to adjourn ( 31) In 7DCCtin o6 f 1t4 he following items re acquisition of necessary right-of-way for the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Contract No. 14-1-1A. See page "AA" (a) verbal report of General Counsel. (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file General Counsel's Memorandum dated May 29, 1991. (c) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Counsel to engage the law firm of Palmieri, Tyler, Wiener, Wilhelm a Waldron as Special Counsel for said right-of-way acquisition. -12- 6/12/91 ( 32) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 33 ) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn ( 34 ) DISTRICT 7 O i eeriness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 35) DISTRICT 7 Con�tion of motion to adjourn ( 36) DISTRICT 14 O i�business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 37) DISTRICT 14 Condon of motion to adjourn -13- MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts P.O.Box 8127•10844 Ellis Avenue ` of Orange County, California Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 7elephone: (714)962.2411 JOINT BOARDS MEETING DATE June 12, 1991 at 7:30 p.m. The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting. ALL DISTRICTS *_01 9(a): AWARD PURCHASE OF THIRTEEN (13) FOUR-WHEEL ELECTRIC CARGO CARRIERS, $PECIFI ATION NO. A-152, AND FIVE 5 FOUR-WHEEL ELECTRIC PERSONNEL ARRAS,SPECIFICATION NO. A-153. The Districts' present-day motor pool consists of trucks, various pieces of heavy equipment, automobiles and electric carriers. As part of the ongoing effort of evaluating our operations to assure that we are being as efficient as possible, and our program of utilizing electric carts instead of motor vehicles where possible to help reduce air emissions, staff has studied our motor pool and determined that eighteen additional electric vehicles are needed to transport workers, equipment and tools within the confines of the treatment plants (each treatment plant site is over 100 acres in size). Accordingly, staff has prepared specifications for Thirteen (13) Electric Cargo Carriers as well as Five (5) Electric Personnel Carriers. All of these units are required due to operational and maintenance demands of the rapidly expanding treatment facilities at the two plant sites. (1) Cargo Carriers, Specification No. A-152: Two bids were received for the thirteen cargo carriers. It is recommended that the Districts award the purchase of Thirteen (13) Four-Wheel Electric Cargo Carriers, Specification No. A-152, to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company, low bidder, for their proposed amount of $54,600.00 plus sales tax. A bid tabulation is attached ..i to the supporting agenda material. The last purchase of cargo carriers for the Districts was in 1989. The price received on this bid is $62.40 per unit lower than was paid in 1989. w ! June 12. 1991 (2) Personnel Carriers, Specification No. A-153: Two bids were received for the five personnel carriers. It is recommended that the Districts award the purchase of Five (5) Four-Wheel Electric Personnel Carriers, Specification No. A-153, to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company, low bidder, for their proposed amount of $18,000.00 plus sales tax. A bid tabulation is attached to the supporting agenda material. The last purchase of personnel carriers for the Districts was in 1989. The price received on this bid is $99.00 per unit lower than was paid in 1989. The 1990-91 Fiscal Year Equipment Budget includes $94,200 to cover the purchase of electric carts. 9(b): AWARD PURCHASE OF ONE (1) EACH COMBINATION HIGH PRESSURE WATER AND VACUUM SEWER CLEANIN TRU K, PE IFIC TION NO. A-154. This type of equipment was developed in the early 1960's and is utilized by various agencies for many types of municipal cleaning functions. The combination high pressure water and vacuum sewer cleaning truck will be operated by the Collection Facilities Division of the Operations and Maintenance Department. This unique equipment will be utilized for routine cleaning of Districts' facilities such as small sewers, siphons and pump station wetwells to remove grease, debris and grit materials. In emergencies it will also be used to relieve stoppages and for street washdown and cleanup. A Maintenance Department staff engineer was assigned to investigate the `+ Districts' specific needs, review potential suppliers and current equipment capabilities, discuss experiences with other agencies and develop technical specifications. The purpose of this particular type of unit is to: 1. Reduce the need for workers to enter confined spaces to perform cleaning services. 2. Reduce the exposure of workers to explosive, poisonous or oxygen deficient gases. 3. Improve productivity by allowing maintenance tasks to be performed quicker, easier and safer. 4. Allow the workers to clean areas which were heretofore not feasible. 5. Remove grease, grit, roots and other debris from the sewers upstream of the treatment plants which will help improve plant operations. The basic combination truck is made up of a high volume vacuum air conveyance system, high pressure water pumping system, debris handling and storage, fresh water storage and recycling systems. These systems are integrated and packaged on a commercially available conventional truck chassis. �.O -2- June 12, 1991 The Collection Facilities Division, with a staff of 31, maintains 33 pump stations and approximately 825 miles of underground lines ranging in size from 6 inches to 24 inches in diameter. The need for cleaning the 6-inch and 24-inch lines and siphons necessitates the requirement for high volume, high pressure water pumping capability and high volume vacuum capability. The cleaning process entails the washing and removal of the debris from the facility or pipe being maintained. This simultaneous process is well suited to the combination truck. On May 21, five bids were received, plus one "no bid". Haaker Equipment Company submitted two bids, one with a Ford chassis and one with an International Harvester chassis. Sancon Engineering's bid does not conform to Districts' specification in the following areas: 1. The vacuum system utilizes a positive displacement exhauster instead of the two-stage centrifugal fan specified. The advantage of the fan is reliability and ease of maintenance. 2. The hose reel is rear-mounted on the Sancon unit. The specifications called for front-mount for employee safety while working in traffic. 3. Sancon's proposed water reclamation system requires the waste water to be recycled through the fresh water tanks. The Districts' specifications require bypassing of the fresh water tank because clean water is used for washdown of city streets. With the Sancon unit, the stored water and tanks would be contaminated. It is therefore recommended that the proposal from Sancon Engineering be rejected for not complying with Districts' specifications. It is further recommended that award be made to Haaker Equipment, the lowest bidder meeting specifications, for their proposed unit with the International Harvester chassis, in the amount of $232,610.00 plus sales tax. The 1990-91 Equipment Budget includes $242,000.00 for this item. However, when sales tax is included with the purchase price, the budgeted amount will be exceeded by over $7,000.00. Sufficient funds are available to cover the overage by transferring the budget savings from the electric cart purchases [Item 9(a) above]. 9(c): AUTHORIZING PURCHASE OF ONE ROSETTE MULTIBOTTLE WATER SAMPLER PECIFICATION NO. E- The Laboratory Division is responsible for performing analyses of air, wastewater, sludge and ocean samples in support of the various activities of the Sanitation Districts. These activities will now include performing the water quality tasks during Year 7 of the Marine Monitoring Program (see agenda item 9(g) below) to help ensure the protection of human health and the marine environment, determine compliance with the NPDES permit terms and conditions and document the short- and long-term effects of the discharge on receiving waters to assure the beneficial use of these resources. -3- June 12, 1991 The water quality portion of the Marine Monitoring Program requires the analysis of discrete water samples collected throughout the water column for \/ fecal coliform, total suspended solids, grease and oil , and ammonia. Quality assurance samples are analyzed for dissolved oxygen, pH and salinity to check the accuracy of the conductivity, temperature and depth (CTD) underwater profiler. The Laboratory needs to modernize its capabilities to increase sample Integrity, support both the Laboratory and Compliance Division in their research on the effects of the Districts' discharge, and improve laboratory productivity. The Rosette multi-bottle water sampler will replace old obsolete samplers and sampling methods for obtaining the discrete samples for the Marine Monitoring Program. This state-of-the-art sampler will provide enhanced sample integrity and increase the accuracy of the depths at which the water samples are collected by real time depth measurements from our CID profiler. General Oceanics Is the only manufacturer of a Rosette multi-bottle sampler which is compatible with the SEA-BIRD CID water column profiler package now owned and operated by the Districts. Additionally, the sampler will result in the following productivity improvements: 1) reduce sampling time by simultaneously obtaining CID measurements and sampling, 2) eliminate excessive repairs and machining of parts for repair of the existing obsolete sampler, 3) minimize resampling due to sampler malfunctioning, and 4) eliminate the need for additional sampling for quality assurance testing due to limited capacity of the current sampler. The Rosette multi-bottle water sampler will have an approximate payback of 1.9 years. Staff therefore recommends authorization to issue a purchase order to General Oceanics, Inc. , for purchase of One Rosette Multi-Bottle Water Sampler (Specification No. E-200) for a total price of $25,027.00-plus freight and sales tax. 9(d): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 6 TO CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17. Job No. J-17, Central Laboratory, provides for the construction of a new laboratory, upgrading of the site paving, and provisions for additional parking at a cost of $7.8 million. Change Order No. 6 consists of five items of work for an addition of $34,319.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation. Item 1, in the amount of $5,728.00, provides for the connection of a backflow preventer to the fire alarm control board. This connection is required for the fire protection of the building and was not shown on the contract plans. Item 2, in the amount of $899.00, provides for a top frame and structural tube header over the double doors at the dumpster area to provide structural stability to the doors. Item 3, in the amount of $10,275.00, is the construction of a portion of an off-site storm drain and sewer line at a depth two feet lower than shown on the contract plans because of an existing electrical conduit found in the pipe zone. This item also provides for cleaning of an existing sewer line, additional work to protect existing utilities, additional sand around the sewer line and the construction of two additional catch basins. Item 4, in the amount of $2,200.00, provides for the addition of exhaust fan filter supports above the roof to provide adequate support for the filters. Item 5, for $15,217.00, provides for the installation of aluminum thru-wall flashing over all storefront windows to prevent water leaks which Iftow could occur at the tops of the windows. -4- June 12, 1991 The above-described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items are for replaced work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 6 for an addition of $34,319.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for five items of additional work. There is no time extension associated with this change order. 9(e): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. J-19-1. Job No. J-19-1, Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, is part of the master-planned $66 million Central Power Generation Systems which are . being built under several contracts at both plants. This $15.4 million contract includes installation of three pre-purchased digester gas burning, spark-ignited, 3472 horsepower engines with generators which are each capable of producing 2500 KW of electrical power. Change Order No. 1 adds one item of work and $11,436.00 to the contract. This item, in the amount of $11,436.00, is for the addition of a new terminal box and three 36-pair cables at the Control Center Building. The new box and cables were necessary to extend existing cables that the contract drawings required to be rerouted from the Information Services Building to the Control Center Building. The existing cables were not long enough to reach the Control Center Building. The above-described change would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. This item is not for replaced work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 for an addition of $11,436.00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation. There is no time extension associated with this change order. 9(f) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 11 TO GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-1. Job No. PI-34-1, Gas Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, includes the construction of a new city water pump station, a new power building, and a new gas compressor building at a cost of $13.3 million. The contract also includes supplying and installing three reciprocating compressors at Plant No. 1, and supplying three reciprocating compressors at Plant No. 2 for future installation by others. Change Order No. 11 adds five items of work and $14,968.00 to the contract. Item 1, in the amount of $10,410.00, is for rerouting two electrical cable trays and piping in Tunnel No. 4, Tunnel No. 7 and the basement of the Gas Compressor Building. The cable trays and associated piping were rerouted to maintain a width of 36 inches in the utility tunnel for better safety and maintenance access. Item 2, in the amount of $1,613.00, is for rerouting two existing ferric chloride (FECL) lines originally routed through tunnel intersection H. These FECL lines were routed along a wall which was demolished -5- June 12, 1991 in this contract. Item 3, in the amount of $305.00, is for upgrading the electrical circuit feeding the two sump pumps in the Gas Compressor Building. The circuit shown in the contract drawings is not capable of operating both sump pumps simultaneously. Item 4, in the amount of $1,121.00, is for replacing the four type "B" fixtures shown by the contract plans in the control room of the City Water Pump Station with four fluorescent recessed type fixtures. The recessed fixtures will be installed in the room's suspended ceiling. The type "B" fixtures shown are not intended for installation in a suspended ceiling. Item 5, in the amount of $1,519.00, is for installation of condensate drains in the 12-inch high pressure air lines in Tunnels 5 and 8. These drains are not shown in the contract plans. The above-described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items are for replaced work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 11 for an addition of $14,968.00 to the contract with Ziebarth 8 Alper. There is no time extension associated with this change order. 9(g): APPROVING YEAR 7 NPDES OCEAN MONITORING AGREEMENT WITH SAIC. As a condition of the five-year NPDES modified 301(h) waiver ocean discharge permit, jointly issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) in 1985, the Districts must conduct an extensive monitoring program designed to characterize the effects of our discharge on the ocean environment. The NPDES permit expired in February 1990, however, it has been administratively extended pending a decision by EPA on the application for renewal of the 301(h) permit authorized by the Boards in 1989. In the interim, the existing monitoring program is required to be continued. In 1985 the Districts issued a Request for Proposals to provide Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for the Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall , Specification No. S-032. After evaluation of seven respondents, the Districts entered into an agreement with Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) to provide these services for the five-year life of the permit, and negotiated a fee for Year 1 (1985-86) in the amount of $916,680.00. Between the Initial contract and Year 6 (1990-91) the scope of the monitoring program was Increased significantly to comply with changing EPA requirements. The Year 6 SAIC effort is $1,821,365.00. Enclosed with the supporting agenda documents is the report and recommendation of the Selection Committee along with a detailed analysis of the SAIC proposal for Year 7 (1991-92) of the ocean monitoring program, in the amount of $1,856,923.00. The Selection Committee recommends approval of Addendum No. 8 to the agreement with SAIC, extending the ocean monitoring agreement for 1991-92. -6- June 12, 1991 9(h): RECEIVE AND FILE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATIONS AND APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS FOR SURVEYING SERVICES FOR VARIOUS COLLECTION SYSTEM AND TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS, SPECIFICATION NO. S-051. In June 1988, the Directors approved two long-term surveying services contracts to provide necessary surveying for various collection system and treatment plant projects. Those contracts are expiring and, in April , the Directors authorized the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate new long-term surveying services contracts. Proposals were solicited from five firms. In order to accommodate the large volume of collection system and treatment plant work, and to assure that surveying services will be available when needed, the Committee has negotiated new agreements with three firms, Bush and Associates, DGA Consultants and Clifford A. Forkert, Civil Engineer. The agreements provide prices for the first year and an option to renew the contracts for up to two additional years if a satisfactory price increase, within guidelines approved in the contract, can be negotiated by staff. The contracts provides hourly rates (at straight time) including profit, for requested services as follows: Bush and Clifford Forkert Associates DGA Civil Engineer Licensed Surveyor, Civil Engineer/ per hour $ 68 $ 60 $ 60 Two-Man Crew, per hour $124 $130 $110 Three-Nan Crew/per hour $164 $164 $157 Draftsman/per hour S 40 S 53 $ 36 Maximum Escalation Rate for 92/93 3% 3% 3% Maximum Escalation Rate for 93/94 3% 3% 3% Minimum Charge for Travel (each way) No Charge Included $0.00<25 miles radius $0.40>50 miles total Supplies and Materials At Cost At Cost At Cost Minimum Numbers of Hours per Call Out 1/2 hr. Actual Actual Maximum Allowed/per year $75,000 $50.000 $75,000 The total surveying requirements over the next three years are estimated to average about $200,000 per year. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated rates for providing Surveying Services, Specification No. S-051, and adoption of resolutions approving agreements with Bush and Associates, DGA Consultants and Clifford A. Forkert Civil Engineer to provide said services for 1991-92, at quoted hourly rates with option to renew for up to two years. Copies of the certifications and resolutions are attached with the supporting documents. -7- June 12, 1991 9(i) : RECEIVE AND FILE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS RE MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1 JOB Nog P,:38, AND MISCELLANEOUSIMP VEMENT T FA IL I PL NU. B N . PZ-43. As our treatment facilities age, ongoing rehabilitation and refurbishment work is necessary to keep the plants on-line and functioning properly. These jobs for miscellaneous facilities improvements at both plants will replace equipment which is obsolete or has reached the end of its useful lifespan, rehabilitate facilities which are in need of repair, and modify process elements to improve plant-wide performance. They also incorporate numerous small facilities additions that can most economically be accomplished in a single, larger contract. Staff has prepared a scope of work outlining the improvements to various plant processes at both the Huntington Beach Treatment Plant and Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant. The work includes improvements to the primary treatment facilities, sludge dewatering buildings, digestion facilities, utilities, support facilities, process improvements, building repairs and painting. There are 160 separate items of work between the two plants. The list is an accumulation of modifications deemed necessary by our Operations and Maintenance Divisions and improvements identified in the Districts' long-range Master Plan. Most of this work is on existing process equipment which will require extensive coordination to accommodate ongoing plant operations during construction. The estimated design/construction cost is $20 to $25 million. The major work elements are summarized as follows: Reclamation Plant No. 1 (Job No. P1-38) : Included in the primary sedimentation system are improvements to the sludge density metering, separation of comnon pump discharges, and increased number of points being monitored by the system's programmable logic controller. The sludge dewatering belt presses will be modified to allow for a longer retention time of solids in the machines to reduce moisture of the final cake which will reduce transportation costs. The polymer injection system will be modified to reduce the amount of chemical used and increase the cost effectiveness of using these chemicals. The foul air scrubbing system will be modified to reduce the amount of chemical usage, add new access/inspection doors and changes to duct work will be made to maximize the system flexibility. General repairs and modifications to the plant include improving the storm water drainage at various points throughout the plant, providing better access to large apparatus for easier maintenance and personnel safety, general landscaping and security improvements. Treatment Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-43) : Modifications to the plant water pump station will include removal of existing inlet strainers which are a high maintenance item and replacement by in-line discharge strainers which are self-cleaning. The wetwell level system is unreliable and uses only one valve for proper operation. The instrumentation and hardware will be modified to make the system more reliable and provide for optimum system use. An influent test meter facility will be added to the Ocean -8- June 12, 1991 Outfall Booster Station which will allow certification of influent meters at the Districts' facilities. At °C" Headworks, an .additional grit washing system will be added, deteriorated electric cable trays will be replaced, and platforms will be added to better access equipment for maintenance. A general review of the plant water system at Plant No. 2 will be undertaken to include low pressure delivery to equipment which is currently served by high pressure water. This information will allow the design of a system which will reduce operational costs, delay or eliminate the purchase of additional large pumping systems, and reduce overall maintenance costs. As the engineering design progresses, some of these projects may be dropped for operational , economic or other reasons. As part of the 1989 Master Plan, a study to evaluate the overall earthquake preparedness of the Districts' facilities was completed. The study recommended a risk reduction program including structural improvements to buildings and mechanical improvements to equipment to reduce the damaging effect of movement during a seismic episode. Separately, the Directors authorized Dames 8 Moore to conduct a study of crucial facilities and provide recommendations to reduce potential damage, set standards for future structural retrofit (not a part of this work) and equipment tie-downs and strengthening which is included as part of this work. A design allowance necessary to implement these recommendations is also included within the scope v of work for these projects. This design work, representing about 20% of the design fee (5000 hours), is based on a staff estimate. Adjustments may be necessary in the future to this amount once the Dames 8 Moore work is completed. Proposals were solicited from three firms and the Selection Committee has negotiated a professional services agreement with John Carollo Engineers to prepare the plans and specifications and provide construction support services and preparation of 08M manuals, for an amount not to exceed $1,914,805.00, based on hourly rates plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants fees, and fixed profit. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and adoption of a resolution approving the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the supporting agenda documents. 9(j): RECEIVE, FILE AND DENY CLAIM OF VINCENT TRUONG. The Districts have received a claim from the attorney for Vincent Truong dated May 8, 1991, for alleged general damages in an estimated amount of $1,300.00, plus medical damages in an unknown amount, due to an automobile accident involving a Districts' vehicle. The routine action appearing on the agenda is to receive, file and deny ..i the claim and refer it to the Districts' liability claims administrator and General Counsel for appropriate action. -9- June 12, 1991 9(k): AUTHORIZING EMPLOYMENT OF SOURCE CONTROL MANAGER ABOVE MID-POINT OF SALARY RANGE. The Source Control Division of the Technical Services Department is responsible for regulating the discharge of industrial and commercial wastes to the Districts' sewerage system. It is the front line of the Districts' program to control toxic discharges which can affect sludge quality, air quality and effluent quality. It is staffed with 43 positions that include engineers, field inspectors and clerks. In March the Districts' Source Control Manager, Richard von Langen, resigned to move to the Bay area. Since then, we have been recruiting for a replacement. A candidate has been selected based on education, technical and supervisory experience, and ability to effectively communicate in the regulatory and public arena. The selected candidate has been employed as the Source Control Manager at the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts since 1988. While their program is similar to ours, it is larger. L.A. 's manager basically has the same responsibilities as our program, but with approximately double the staff and permittees. The candidate is attracted to our program because of our philosophy and outlook. Our tradition of excellence and willingness to challenge the conventional are very appealing to her. Employed by the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts since 1977, she has worked as a project engineer and supervising engineer conducting groundwater recharge research, grant proposals, hazardous waste site studies, and a variety of source control functions. She possesses a BS and MS from the University of Texas at Austin, is a Registered Civil Engineer and resides in Orange County. The candidate is currently earning considerably more than the Districts' staff is authorized to offer (mid-point of the salary range) and, in fact, is earning more than the existing top step of the Districts' Source Control Manager position. Because this position is also pending the annual salary range adjustment, staff is requesting authorization to negotiate a salary and employ this individual at a salary above the mid-point of the salary range (currently $4,766 to $6,196 per month) for the Districts Source Control Manager classification. 9(1) : GENERAL AUTHORIZATION FOR ATTENDANCE OF PERSONNEL AND DIRECTORS AT TRAINING PROGRAMS, LEGISLATIVE, REGULATORY AND OTHER MEETINGS AND FUNCTIONS IN 1991-92. On an annual basis the General Manager is routinely authorized to designate members of the Board and/or staff to attend training programs, legislative, regulatory and other meetings and functions, conferences, etc. which he believes will be of value to the Districts. Such attendance is in accordance with existing Districts' travel and expense reimbursement policies and the approved annual budget. It is recommended that this authorization be renewed for 1991-92. Included in the 1991-92 budget is the amount of $210,000 for this work. The budget amount includes funds for staff training for treatment plant electrical , mechanical , instrumentation and other systems; supervisory and management training; attendance and participation in state and federal legislative, regulatory proceedings; participation in various wastewater management-related groups; Board committee meeting expenses, and other related expenses. -10- June 12, 1991 DISTRICT 2 9(m) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO PORTION OF EUCLID INTERCEPTOR SEWER, BETWEEN BROADWAY AND ORANGETHORPE AVENUE (INCLUDING ITY OF ANAHEIM STREET IMPROVEMENT NTRA N 2-2 - ; KA L A REL tt EWER, BETWEEN EUCLIDSTREET AND WA N TREET NINTH TREET C NTRA T NU. - 8; AND RANGEWOOD DIVER ION bLWtK, UUNTRACI NO. 2-2 . This project is the construction of a vitrified clay and two reinforced concrete gravity sewer lines and appurtenances. Contract No. 2-26-3, Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue (Including City of Anaheim Street Improvements) ; Contract No. 2-28, Katella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street; and Contract No. 2-29, Orangewood Diversion Sewer, in the total amount of $8.0 million, are located within the City of Anaheim and the City of Fullerton. Change Order No. 1 adds five items of work and $143,363.00 to the contract. Item 1, in the amount of $2,435.00, provides for additional work at Euclid Street and Broadway where leakage from a water line occurred during repair work being done by the City of Anaheim. Leakage from the line saturated the Contractor's compacted fill , thereby necessitating re-excavation and re-compaction of the area. The City of Anaheim will be billed for this cost. Item 2, in the amount of $82,971.00, provides for additional work due to undisclosed sewer laterals. Manholes were installed at each of the laterals to avoid direct connections to the sewer trunk to prevent gas migration back into the buildings serviced by the laterals. Item 3, in the amount of $10,062.00, is the addition of K-rail on Orangewood Avenue to reduce the potential of traffic ... accidents by providing a safety barrier. Item 4, in the amount of $5,538.00, provides for additional work required when undisclosed telephone cables were found on Orangewood Avenue. Item 5, in the amount of $42,357.00, provides for temporary demobilization of the project. The project was stopped when a large, undisclosed telephone duct bank was found in Orangewood Avenue and State College Boulevard; the duct was not shown on the contract drawings and the necessary contract modifications could not be completed in time to fulfill the contractual obligations with the City of Anaheim to open the street to accommodate Anaheim Stadium traffic. The work will be accomplished separately at a later date. Except for Item 1, the above-described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items are for replaced work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 for an addition of $143,363.00 to the contract with Steve Bubalo Construction. There is no time extension associated with this change order. DISTRICT 3 9(n) : APPROVE TAX PASS-THROUGH AGREEMENT WITH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY F WESTMIN TER. Use of tax increment financing by Redevelopment Agencies to generate revenues for redevelopment projects freezes the District's (as well as the other taxing agencies') ad valorem tax revenues. The incremental tax revenues are -11- June 12, 1991 then used by the Redevelopment Agency to pay off the debt incurred to finance ...� the project. However, the redevelopment activities within each project area generally result in additional flow to the Districts' sewerage facilities, thus increasing the cost of sewerage service but without an attendant increase in Sanitation Districts' revenue to pay said costs. To address this problem, the Boards of Directors have previously adapted a policy of negotiating with Redevelopment Agencies for funding of Districts' services for redevelopment project areas, using a priority ranking of alternatives. The action appearing on the agenda is the consideration of a resolution approving a pass-through agreement providing District No. 3 with 80% of its property tax revenues that would have historically been allocated to the District were it not for the Redevelopment Agency financing mechanism. This agreement is consistent with previously established Board policy. 9(o): AWARD PURCHASE OF TWO (2) EACH VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE UNITS, SPECIFICATION NO. E-199. The Districts have, as part of our energy conservation program, started replacing worn out eddy current drive units with more energy efficient variable frequency drive units throughout the plants and outlying pump stations. At our Seal Beach Pump Station, we have two of the eddy current drives for which we are having an increasingly difficult time finding adequate spare parts for repairs. These units are old and should be replaced. Staff has determined that it will cost a total of $122,172.00 to remove the existing units, install the new variable frequency drives, conduit, wiring and modify the existing instrumentation and pump control systems. This work will be done using Districts' maintenance staff. Sealed bids were opened May 14, 1991 for the variable frequency drive units. Eight bids were received, ranging from a high of $71,372.00 to a low of $47,188.00, plus sales tax. Staff recommends award of Specification No. E-199, Purchase of Two (2) Each Variable Frequency Drive Units, to Emerson Industrial Controls, c/o Power Systems Company, La Habra, the lowest responsible bidder, for a total of $47,188.00, plus sales tax. DISTRICT 5 9(p) : AUTHORIZE SELECTION COMMITTEE TO SOLICIT A PROPOSAL AND NEGOTIATE ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE KEITH COMPANIES FOR ADDITIONAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES RE CONTRACTS NOS. 5-35 AND 5-36. In May 1988, the Directors approved a professional services agreement for design and construction services with The Keith Companies relative to South Coast Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-35, and Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36. In October 1989, the Directors approved Addendum No. 1 to the agreement for changes in the scope of work initiated by The Irvine Company requiring realignment of Pacific Coast Highway and the subsequent relocation of „r the Crystal Cove Pump Station. -12- June 12, 1991 ...� The Crystal Cove Pump Station is located in an unnamed canyon considered a stream bed by the California Department of Fish and Game. A permit for construction is required from the California Department of Fish and Game and, as part of that permit, Fish and Game is requiring the District to provide a landscape plan using native species for the displaced flora due to extensive grading for the Crystal Cove Pump Station and drainage structures surrounding It. Fish and Game requires all displaced trees and shrubs be replaced with native species. This work was not included as part of professional services agreement with The Keith Companies and must now be included as part of the permit package. It 1s recommended that the Selection Committee be authorized to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the professional services agreement with The Keith Companies for additional design services providing for a landscaping plan for the Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36, in compliance with the California Department of Fish and Game requirements. Following the Selection Committee's negotiations, the proposed addendum will be presented to the Board for consideration. 9(q) : APPROVE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO BAYSIDE DRIVE TRUNK SEWER, PHASE 3, CONTRACT NO. 5-34-3. In February 1991, the Directors approved plans and specifications for Contract No. 5-34-3, Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 3. The project, which has been delayed pending the opening of Newport Coast Drive, is tentatively scheduled to bid on July 16th. The revised engineer's estimate for this work is now $4,500,000. This project is the extension of gravity sewers to serve Corona del Mar and the developing areas south of Corona del Mar. The sewers are being constructed in phases, with the southerly terminus now at the intersection of Bayside Drive and Marguerite Avenue. Contract No. 5-34-3 begins at this location and includes construction through Corona del Mar within Pacific Coast Highway by means of tunneling within the Corona del Mar commercial district, and a combination of tunneling and open excavation southerly of the commercial District to the city boundary. In addition, the contract includes abandonment of the existing Corona del Mar pump station and minor repairs to adjacent facilities. The project will connect to a previously constructed sewer south of the city limit to Crystal Cove. In November 1990, the Directors authorized staff to negotiate an agreement with the City of Newport Beach for a cooperative project to install raised medians along Pacific Coast Highway through Corona del Mar as requested by the City of Newport Beach. The medians can be constructed at little additional cost in the areas southerly of Poppy Avenue where the sewer will be installed by open excavation. However, southerly of Seaward Road, the project will be installed via tunneling, and the extra costs of medians are higher. Staffs of both the District and the City recommend that costs be shared equally between the two agencies pursuant to a reimbursement agreement which has been prepared by the District's General Counsel . Total median cost is estimated at $275,000. Staff recommends approval of the resolution authorizing the Chairman and Secretary to execute the reimbursement agreement with the City of Newport Beach in form approved by the General Counsel. -13- June 12, 1991 DISTRICTS 7 AND 14 9(r): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO BAKER FORCE MAINS FROM MAIN STREET PUMP TATION T BRI T L STREET, CONTRACT N 14-1- This $7.9 million project is for the installation of a double barrel sewer force main, gravity interceptor and appurtenances in Baker Street, Airway Avenue, Airport Loop Drive and airport parking lot easements from east of Bristol Street, under the 405 Freeway to the Main Street Pump Station. Change Order No. 1 adds one item and $7,600.00 to the contract. This change order, in the amount of $7,600.00, provides for a separate performance bond required by John Wayne Airport Authority. The bond was required because a portion of the new sewer line is being constructed within an easement in the John Wayne Airport Authority property. The bond ensures that all airport property will be restored to the airport authority's satisfaction. The Districts will reimburse the Contractor in a future change order if additional costs are incurred by the Contractor as a result of the performance bond requirements or by a possible extension of the bond. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 for an addition of $7,600.00 to the contract with Miaden Buntich Construction Co. , Inc. There is no time extension associated with this change order. DISTRICT 7 9(s): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDERS NOS. 1 AND 2 TO CAMPUS RELIEF SEWER, BETWEEN VON KARMAN AVENUE AND JAMBOREE ROAD NTRA T N . 7-1 AAND ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT AS COMPLETE. This project is the installation of a trunk sewer line and appurtenances in Campus Drive from Von Kerman Avenue east past Jamboree Boulevard to a location between Jamboree Boulevard and Carlson Avenue in the City of Irvine. (1) Change Order No. 1 Change Order No. 1 includes 3 items of work for an addition of $54,355.63 and 10 days for completion of the additional work. Item 1, in the amount of $3,355.63, provided for the connection of an undisclosed 6-inch VCP sewer lateral via a temporary bypass to maintain service of the 6-inch lateral until the 21-inch VCP pipe was laid. Item 2 provides for time extension of 10 calendar days to the contract for inclement weather beyond the contract allowance of five calendar days. Item 3, in the amount of $51,000.00, is a bonus payment on the contract for early completion of the work. The bonus is for 102 days in the contract-specified amount of $500.00 per day. (2) Change Order No. 2 Change Order No. 2, a credit in the amount of $696.10, is for an adjustment in engineer's quantities. -14- June 12, 1991 .� Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 for an addition of $54,355.63 and a time extension of 10 calendar days to the contract; and Change Order No. 2 for a net deduction of $696.10 from the contract with Albert W. Davies, Inc. (3) Acceptance of Contract as Complete Albert W. Davies, Inc. has fulfilled all contractual obligations within the specified and extended time. Therefore, staff recommends adoption of the resolution attached to the agenda material , authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the Final Closeout Agreement and filing of the Notice of Completion as required. The final project cost is $535,275.53. 9(t): APPROVE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH THE ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RE IMPROVEMENTS TO EL MODENA-IRVINE CHANNEL. County Sanitation District No. 7 operates an 8-inch VCP sewer siphon which is in conflict with Orange County Flood Control District's (OCFCD) proposed improvements to the El Modena-Irvine Channel between Browning Avenue and Red Hill Avenue, located within the City of Tustin. The District's sewer is in an easement, acquired from the County in January 1964. It requires the District to relocate its facilities at District expense upon written notice by the County. The District received a written notice to relocate on January 29, 1991. Combining the sewer work with the proposed OCFCD improvements should save money for both agencies. Staff therefore recommends that the General Manager be authorized to execute a reimbursement agreement, in a form approved by the General Counsel , and deposit $40,000 with the County which is the estimated cost of the sewer construction. The District will pay to actual cost of the bid item for the work upon completion of the project, plus 10% for inspection and contract administration. ALL DISTRICTS 11: NOMINATIONS FOR JOINT CHAIRMAN. As provided in the Joint Boards' Rules of Procedures, nominations for Joint Chairman are made at the regular June meeting and the election takes place at the July regular meeting. Nominations and election of the Vice Joint Chairman will be conducted at the July regular meeting. For new Director's information, we have included below an excerpt from the current Rules of Procedures for meetings relative to the election of the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. 118. Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administration Organization. °A Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization shall be elected by a majority vote of the Districts at the regular meeting in July of each year. The nominations for Joint -15- June 12, 1991 Chairman shall be made at the regular Board meeting in June each `r year, and the nominees may prepare a statement of not more than 100 words stating their qualifications for the office of Chairman. The statements shall be mailed to members of the Joint Boards of Directors with the agenda and other meeting material for the July regular meeting. "The nominations for Vice Joint Chairman shall be made at the regular Board meeting in July each year and shall be made immediately following the election of the Joint Chairman. "The Chairman and Vice Chairman shall serve at the pleasure of a majority of the Districts. In the event the office of Chairman becomes vacant due to resignation or retirement of the incumbent prior to the expiration of the regular term, the Vice Chairman shall automatically succeed to the office of the Chairman and shall continue to serve through the remainder of the regular term unless sooner removed by action of a majority of the Districts. In the event the office of Vice Chairman becomes vacant prior to the expiration of the regular term, nominations and the election of a Director to serve in that capacity shall be conducted at the next regular Board meeting. The person so elected shall serve the balance of the regularly scheduled term unless sooner removed as a result of action by a majority of the Districts." 13: FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE NINE-MONTH PERIOD ENDING MARCH 31, 1991. Enclosed are the budgetary financial statements for the third quarter of the fiscal year. The Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund budget statements were reviewed by the Fiscal Policy Committee on May 15, 1991. If any Director has questions pertaining to the statements, please call Gary Streed, Director of Finance, at (714) 962-2411, extension 2500. 14: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF JOINT FISCAL POLICY/EXECUTIVE COMMITTEES. The Fiscal Policy and Executive Committees met jointly on May 22, 1991. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on their deliberations and recommendations for consideration by the Boards. 15: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CONSERVATION, RECYCLE AND REUSE COMMITTEE. The Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee met on May 30, 1991. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on its discussions and recommendations for consideration by the Boards. 16: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS AFTER JUNE 30, 1991. The individual District's 1991-92 budgets will not be adopted until the July Joint Board Meeting and, therefore, it is necessary to have Board authorization for the payment of claims from July 1 to the date of adoption of next year's budgets. It is recommended that this routine action, taken �.. annually, be approved as set forth on the agenda listing. -16- June 12, 1991 17: AGENDA FOR CLOSED SESSION. From time to time it is necessary for the Boards to convene in closed session to consider purchase and sale of real property, potential or pending litigation, personnel matters or other matters which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act. In order to avoid a situation where a closed session is needed but does not appear on the agenda, this standing item is placed on the agenda each month providing for a closed session at the regular meeting, if deemed necessary by the Boards. DISTRICTS 6, 7 AND 14 31: AUTHORIZING EMPLOYMENT OF SPECIAL COUNSEL RE ACQUISTION OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY FOR BAKER-GISLER INTERCEPTOR, CONTRACT NO. 14-1-1A. Enclosed with the supporting agenda material is a memorandum from the General Counsel recommending that the Boards authorize employment of the law firm of Palmieri , Tyler, Wiener, Wilhelm & Waldron to serve as special counsel in connection with the acquisition of rights-of-way for Contract No. 14-1-1A. J W ne yl ster _ ene 1 Ma er JWS:jt -17- RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(g) (1) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .f ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA IOEAA ELLI9 AVENUE May 9 , 1991 (Revised*) RO.8Ox 919 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.0 UFORNIA 92222.9127 MIA)9622.11 STAFF REPORT Comprehensive Ocean Monitoring Program and Ocean Monitoring Contract: Amendment No. 8 (Year 7) to Contract with SAIL, Ocean Monitoring Services Specification No. S-032. BACKGROUND ON THE DISTRICTS' OCEAN MONITORING PROGRAM The Clean Water Act (CWA) of 1972 requires full secondary treatment, unless a waiver is granted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under Section 301(h) provisions amending the CWA in 1977. Section 301(h) authorizes EPA to grant waivers to publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) that discharge into deep, well mixed marine waters because Congress recognized that, under certain carefully proscribed circumstances, such discharges do no harm and there is no reason to incur the significant costs of secondary treatment along with its attendant air and land impacts. The Districts' aggressive source control program has resulted in a raw sewage influent to the treatment plant which is better than California's toxic effluent standards for ocean discharge. Subsequent treatment prior ._. to discharge produces a 50:50 mixture of advanced primary and full secondary wastewater effluent which received the recognition of EPA's 1989 Second Place National Award for Operations and Maintenance Excellence for Large Full Secondary Treatment Facilities. The Districts' 1990 Annual Report includes a special 5-year perspective (1985-1990) which concludes that the marine environment is not being significantly impacted. (An Executive Summary draft is available. ) As a condition of the existing 301(h) modified NPDES ocean Discharge Permit, jointly issued February 22, 1985 by EPA Region IX and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, the Districts must conduct extensive monitoring designed to characterize the effects of discharge on the ocean environment. In parallel with the past facilities planning, environmental review, and public testimony leading to 112020 VISION, " the Districts' Boards of Directors voted in July 1989 to reapply for extension of the waiver. THE 301(H) WAIVER A detailed five volume application for waiver was submitted on August 28, 1989, within the 180 day period prior to permit expiration authorized by statute. Originally issued for a five year period, the 301(h) permit was administratively extended in February 1990, pending EPA's decision on the 7istricts ' application for renewal. EPA has indicated that the formal evaluation leading to a Technical Review Report is underway and a Tentative Decision Document should be available before the end of 1991. Staff *Revised to reflect correction of original submittal from $1, 857,225 to $1,856,923 for Year 7. Staff Report , SAIC Contract Amendment No. 8 �... May 9, 1991 Page Two believes that the Districts' application should be favorably acted on by EPA. This contention is supported by analysis of five years of detailed monitoring data gathered in our program, which was specifically designed for 301(h) evaluation by the EPA Region IX office in 1985. The Districts' consulting experts say that the outfall related changes we have measured are not ecologically significant although they are statistically significant. over the years the portion of the program that was to provide data to allow for a better understanding of statistical effects had not been emphasized. The bulk of the effort was devoted to measuring and documenting all forms of change. We have drawn the reasonable assertion that the change we observe is not ecologically significant. It is incumbent on the Districts to prove this is the case and, therefore, we foresee a refinement of our future monitoring agenda to devote less effort and funding to measurement and description and more toward understanding and explanation. It should be pointed out that no such extensive and costly monitoring program was ever promulgated by EPA before, nor mounted by the other large southern California POTWs. The lack of complete sets of monitoring "facts" may have led, in part, to the $3 million fine incurred in San Diego's recent unsuccessful defense of a waiver, and to the court test that the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles now faces in EPA's final denial of their January 1988 revised waiver application. �..i The EPA's regulatory criteria for continuing a 301(h) waiver are very stringent. New amendments to the CWA in 1987, such as addition of "non-degradation" and "secondary equivalency for toxics" clauses, only increase the burden on POTWs to provide innovative treatment technology and extensive monitoring to assure that all requirements are being comfortably met. In January 1991, EPA published a Revised 301(h) Technical Support Document (TSD) which provides a detailed monitoring road map which must be carefully negotiated by any successful applicant. As demonstrated in San Diego's recently failed attempt, findings of changed environmental conditions - termed trivial by expert marine scientists but deemed significant by EPA - have been upheld as just cause for 301(h) denial. Therefore, staff believes that an enhanced monitoring effort, although expensive by comparison with that of other agencies, is essential to meet the necessarily strict 301(h) tests being applied by EPA. EPA's revised TSD emphasizes sophisticated understanding over simple measurement of changed conditions. This necessitates using functional rather than structural approaches to ecosystem monitoring and developing a greater regional perspective from which to weigh outfall effects. FINE-TUNING THE MARINE MONITORING PROGRAM It is an irony to Districts' staff that our present monitoring program prescribed by EPA is essentially a structural approach. EPA and the RWQCB have both acknowledged the need to modify our program in order to -� reallocate efforts to more efficiently address the functional needs of 301(h) . It is not clear at this stage that reallocation of efforts will Staff Report SAIC Contract Amendment No. 8 May 9 , 1991 Page Three cause any substantial future increase or decrease in costs. Since the data gathering component of marine monitoring is the most costly, it is quite possible that the Districts' share of future monitoring costs could be significantly reduced once a new Year 8 program is agreed upon. Since 1985, some twenty 301(h) Quarterly Monitoring Meetings have been held among all participants to discuss the District's progress. This has led to the finding that some elements of the monitoring program need fine-tuning. Although Districts ' staff has made progress on defining these needs and requesting program modifications, there is uncertainty as to how agreed upon changes can be made prior to a final decision on the pending reapplication. Therefore, staff will be recommending to the Board (for Year 7 only) additions to the existing program that are felt to be necessary to help demonstrate increased understanding of possible effects and also to strengthen acknowledged weaknesses in the existing program. OTHER ELEMENTS OF THE MARINE MONITORING STRATEGY Additionally, the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) in 1990 published the results of a detailed review of monitoring. The reports, "Monitoring Troubled Waters" and "Monitoring Southern California's Coastal Waters," cite the failure of existing programs to alleviate the public's concern about waste discharge effects. A regional monitoring approach is advocated that would help regulators, policy makers and managers make better, more timely decisions. Staff concurs and suggests that the Districts encompass recommendations of the NAS in our future program where possible and cost effective. Staff and consultants are currently involved in evaluating the NAS reports above for the impact they may have on marine monitoring, waste management, and regulatory decision-making in southern California. There is still time for mid-course correction, but all parties will need a better understanding of the system to make the right choices for both the public and the environment. Staff is recommending a full scale assessment of environmental concerns so that waste management in the coastal zone rests on a firm foundation of scientific understanding guided by well designed monitoring feed-back to the decision-making process. A final component of the Districts' strategy has been to bring aboard a staff of experts in environmental assessment. In conjunction with our planning for "2020 VISION, " this has led to an increased understanding of the interrelated issues of air, land and water and has placed our marine discharge effects properly in the context of overall coastal zone management. Staff scientists and expert consultants have also been primarily responsible for shaping our 301(h) reapplication, building a comprehensive Districts' database and computerized analytical system, and nanaging the 5-year synthesis presented in this year's annual report. Another important activity of staff scientists and expert consultants has Staff Report , SAIC Contract Amendment No. 8 May 9, 1991 Page Four focused on the NPDES monitoring contract with SAIC. This has led to stabilizing contract costs while improving the database quality and enhancing its interpretation over the past three years. THE SAIC MONITORING CONTRACT FOR YEAR 7 (July 1991-June 1992) In 1985, the Districts issued a request for proposals to provide ocean monitoring contract services for the Districts' 120-inch ocean outfall, Specification No. 5-032. After evaluation of seven respondents with bids ranging to over two million dollars, the Districts entered into an agreement with Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) to provide these services for the five-year life of the permit and negotiated a fee for Year 1 at just over one million dollars ($1, 002 ,705) after adding Addenda 2 and 3. Exhibit 1 compares the range of original bid's with the subsequent annual cost for SAIC's service's. At the time of the original contract award it was noted for the Boards' information that the requirements of this unprecedented monitoring program had been established by the EPA and that it was the first of its kind. Although the EPA had yet to fully define all of the work to be accomplished, the NPDES Permit required that the work commence immediately. Because of this, it was anticipated that as the program proceeded and the requirements were refined it would be necessary to modify the contract to provide for the changes that would be required by EPA. The total annual contract amount was changed (with contingencies) by Addenda 3 through 7 to $1, 530,486 (Year 2) , $1,707,294 (Year 3) , $1,942,265 (Year 4) , $1, 609, 570 (Year 5) , and $1,821,365 (Year 6) , respectively. Exhibit 2 provides a detailed breakdown by year for comparable cost categories. The changes for Years 2-4 included significant increases in the scope of work required to be performed to better document the environmental conditions in the vicinity of the Districts' ocean outfall. The Year 5 program reduced the measurement of currents pending additional data summary, increased analysis and reporting (the 5-Year Monitoring Summary) , and shifted some tasks from SAIC to the Districts (water quality, bioaccumulation) and to other independent contractors. The Year 6 program shifted all required NPDES tasks back to SAIC to allow Districts' staff time to develop an in-house database and to analyze the data collected. As presently specified, the Year 7 program includes a few additions over Year 6 and substantially enhances database management, computer-assisted evaluations, and graphical display of results by both SAIC and the Districts. The Year 7 option also continues the BOD and chlorophyll water samples of the previous year and adds additional trawls and chemical QA samples to the field work to better define outfall influence (Options totaling $50, 736) . Including options, the Year 7 cost of $1,856,923 is still only a modest increase over Year 6 ($35,558 or 2%) ; additionally, the�� Year 7 total is subject to a potential decrease of up to $274,767 (water quality cost + profit) as the Districts begins to execute the water Staff Report ,SAIC Contract Amendment No. 8 May 9, 1991 Page Five quality surveys as was done during Year S. It is expected that the actual amount of reduction will be less as staff anticipates the transition will take a few months to accomplish. Thus the Year 7 contract cost shall not exceed $1,856,923 and will be less, down to $1,582,156, depending on the amount of water quality survey work carried out by SAIL. Staff is preparing a separate request for the Board's consideration which would considerably enhance the water quality survey portion of the program. This may also effect the amount of total rebate. Through staff negotiations with SAIC, overall Year 5, 6 and 7 contract costs have been stabilized, even with inclusion of additional special reports, enhancement of database management and evaluation, and incorporation of new samples and chemical analyses needed to answer questions raised during continuing scientific review of the data. This results in part from program efficiencies gained by utilizing the same contractor and also by additional efforts and oceanographic capabilities added by the Districts. Overall, the present SAIC contract program is felt to be greatly enhanced with only a modest and reasonable increase in cost. Exhibits 3 and 4 provide a graphical analysis of major cost elements and overall contract costs by year. PROGRAM RE-EVALUATION AND PROPOSED MONITORING PROGRAM MODIFICATIONS It is understood by SAIC and the Districts that should EPA and the Regional Water Quality Control Board agree to implement suggested changes amounting to reductions in monitoring requirements during Year 7, every effort will be made to fairly and equitably reallocate existing contract resources in this fixed price contract with a negotiated change order. This is likely to occur as described below. Aside from the ongoing monitoring program, one of the major tasks undertaken this past year by contractors, staff, and regulatory agencies has been to re-visit the objectives and methodology of the existing monitoring program. We have had the opportunity to analyze the results of 5 years of data collection, synthesis and analysis. Both strengths and weaknesses of the present program have become evident. Staff, contractors, consultants from the Universities and from the private sector as well as regulatory agencies have been invited to submit recommendations. Our findings have been presented and discussed with EPA and the Regional Water Quality Control Board and we have been invited to submit a short list of changes which could, under the terms of the present permit, be implemented in this year's 1991-92 contract (Year 7) and, more detailed changes to be implemented in Year S. Staff assisted by Districts' consultant (Ecosystems Engineering) are at )resent completing a "short list" of suggested modifications. If accepted .rny EPA and the Regional Water Quality Control Board during Year 7, the changes proposed in this list will result in significant reductions in Staff Report SAIC Contract Amendment No. 8 May 9, 1991 Page six costs. We propose to reduce the frequency of repetitious measurements. The savings will be redirected within the contract to provide a better understanding of the functional components (productivity, food-chain transfer, and benefits of discharging nutrients into the coastal zone) . SAIC has assured us that such changes can be accommodated within the proposed fixed price budget. The short list will be followed by a more detailed list of proposed improvements. EPA has asked us to defer requests for major changes so that they have an opportunity to complete an independent review of the data presented in the waiver application and in our latest set of annual reports and 5 year summary. Staff aided by Dr. J. Calaprice of Ecosystems Engineering, have embarked on a complete reevaluation of the existing program in order to assimilate the expanded concerns enumerated in the NRC reports, EPA's TSD and in input from others. We anticipate the results will be proposed to EPA and RWQCE in time for the Year 8 program (presumably Year 1 of the second 301(h) Waiver) . Viewed in this context this year's program (Year 7) is an interim, transitory program where newer concepts and methodologies will be tested. Assuming that EPA will be able to act in a timely fashion, funding of this year's program provides a mechanism for this transition. Assimilating the comments and requirements of all concerned and molding these into a cost effective monitoring program is a significant and important task. The other contract support during Year 7 proposed Amendment No. 8 for Year 7 of the Agreement With SAIC for ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall, Specification 5-032, includes modifications to the tasks for water quality sampling and analysis, data management and reporting. Under the proposed program, staff will, through a transition period, eventually carry out the collection of water samples during the monthly and quarterly surveys. We will maintain the intent to sample the water mass within a 12 hour period to achieve a comprehensive picture of plume dynamics. To accomplish this will require the Districts to negotiate a contract providing an adequate, safe sampling platform, purchase some new water quality monitoring equipment, and provide adequate staff to carry out all NPDES required monthly and quarterly water quality monitoring activity. This will be one of a series of steps to shift the monitoring burden from outside contractors to an in-house activity utilizing our recognized expertise. Also, staff will be recommending that significant new program initiatives be added to develop a better understanding of initial dilution, plume dynamics and dispersion, and future needs for treatment or alternative discharge strategies relative to the 301(h) permit requirements. These new initiatives will be discussed separately from the SAIC contract staff report. Staff Report SAIC Contract Amendment No. 8 May 9, 1991 Page Seven SUMMARY OF YEAR 7 SAIC CONTRACT The SAIC Year 7 contract is compared with Year 6 and is summarized as follows: SAIC Contract Costs (Thousands) Increase (Decrease) Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 6 to 7 Water Quality $ 0* $ 243, 289 $ 252 ,910** $ 9, 621 Henthic 737, 267 762, 278 764 , 616 2, 338 Trawls 179, 100 188, 646 192 ,962 4 , 316 Rig Fish 54 , 236 53, 983 52 , 669 -1,414 Data Mgt/Eval. 410,567 322 ,708 360,499 37,791 Program Mgt. 89,909 62 , 692 59,482 -3, 210 Options 12,264 44 ,769 47, 691 2, 922 Profit 126,227 143 , 000 126, 194 -16, 806 Total $1, 609, 570 $1, 821, 365 $1, 856,923 $35, 558 =2% *Task was carried out by Districts' staff during Year 5 **Task will be taken over by Districts during Year 7 RECOMMENDATION: SAIC continues to provide competent ocean monitoring services to the Districts. Staff recommends that the SAIC contract be amended (Amendment No. 8) to include water quality as an option to the extent this task is not accomplished by the Districts. Staff also recommends Options 1, 2, and 3 as additions to the scope of work to enhance trawling, chemistry QA, and data integration and display. The total contract, as amended, is not to exceed $1,856, 923 . If all options are executed the total represents a slight increase of two percent over Year 6. Staff Report SAIC Contract Amendment No. 8 May 9, 1991 Page Eight The Year 7 SAIC contract may be summarized as follows: Basic Program Tasks (Labor & Other Direct Costs) $1,430, 128 Profit (Basic Program Tasks) 101,292 Water Quality Tasks (Labor & Other Direct Costs) 252,910 Profit (Water Quality Tasks) 21,857 Options - Trawl, Chem. , QA, Data Mgmt. Tasks 47, 691 Profit (Options Tasks) 3, 045 New Contract Amount $1,856,923 EXHIBIT 1 COST CONPARISOM OF SAIL CONTRACT HISTORY AND OTHER OMLIFIED VENDORS BIDDING ON INITIAL TEAR 1 CONTRACT Range of Originsl Yee. Proposele Klmetfc Lab/ Br. i Science Appllcetions Imr...a K.P. Lind tr. EM CsldoelI Internati cm Corporation (Decrease) Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 year 7 Year 6 to 7 Offshore Water S 282,078 S 672,411 S 466,181 S 136,675 S 391,225 S 394,252 S 558,704 0 S 243,289 252.910 9.621 Quality Benthic 632,001 901,157 706,465 402,297 530,798 582,342 708,199 737,267 762,278 764,616 2,338 Travis 85,352 92,121 121,778 79,328 105,922 115,576 143,746 179,100 188,646 192,%2 4,316 Rlefish 54,768 22,142 32,875 20,915 31,614 34,271 39,976 54,236 53,983 52,569 -1,414 Data Sum ary 413,670 484,402 385,804 162,634 247,075 274,578 342.680 410,567 322,708 360,499 37,791 Interpretation Additiansl 45,824 21,414 23,846 30,079 39,394 48,723 60,660 89,%9 62,692 59,482 -3,210 Services Options and 0 0 0 82,953 55,909 131,276 76,399 12,264 44,769 47,691 2,922 Contingencies Profits 0 0 0 87,824 128,549 126,276 11,901 126,227 143,000 126,194 -16.806 Prime Contract $1,513,693 $2,193,707 $1,736,949 51,002,705 $1,530,486 $1,707,294 $1,942,265 $1,609,570 S1,821,365 $1,856,923 35,558 costs. • Includes options, contingerxles eM profits NN:w REF092009M.XLS EXNISIT 2 ANNUAL SAIL CONTRACT COSTS Incresse TASK/SUBTASKS Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Decrease A. OFFSNOIE WATER QUALITY MONITORING Cent (B) Year 6-7 Family Chemical B Mysicat Sampling 66,94 123,662 126 550 tit 075 148,01 68 581 67.156 -i 425 Monthly Becterial SaMHM 12,1 8.51 9 834 43 087 23,220 Quarterly Chmical 4 Physical SampLl 25 523 SL 417 55,964 71 908 66.09 33,465 33,1 •292 Oscan Cwrent Monitoring 32,089 204 628 201,904 291.41 204,61 Colifona Sampling Charges 0 0 0 11 258 Aonual/R rt/OA-QC/PM/DM 141 243-152 571 71 328 Svb total 136,673 391,225113.7" 252 558 70f (441 949) 243.289. 252.910 9.621. Water Qualityonl 104.5 186 348 267 238 237 333 243,289 252,910 9,621 B. BENTNIC MWITOIING QuarterlySampling 26,807 51.10OS 60 501 81 528 57 959 63 682 5.723 cam rterl Renthic Inf. ldmtifiec 78,401 115 R8BA 130 485 137 148 136 829 139 364 2,535 QuarterlyChemical B Ph ical Anal 184,499 247 447513 359 354 380 2" 283,249 2a2 153 -1 W6 Seetemul BioaccuMMation 41,951 25 709399 43 229 0 4 029 4,423 394 Amin Sampling 9 791 9 740224 10 941 12 315 11,763 12 769 1.0 Anusl Benthfe lnf w Idmtifiwti 1P 476 17 320242 19 375 20 809 19,245 19.81 56 Amual Chmital and iwt Anal 411,372 64 15309t 84 314 105 223 79,770 80 993 1 223 R s/QA•QC/PM/DN 169 434 161 420 -8 014 Sub total 402 297 530 798342 70B 199 737 267 762.278 764.616, 2 338 C. TRAWLS Semiannual Trawl 16.653, 21.672, 592 25 324 31 011 23 439 26 6% S 735 Amel Nist thel Studies 10.245162.4Z? 5 436 17 933 26 608 26,679 29 934 3,255 Ansel Priority Pollutant Sampling52.4305 558 100 489 121 L81 98 048 106,0 10,025 R is/OMQC/PM/DM 40 480 28 261 -12 219 Sub total 79 3282 576 f43 7L6 179 100 188 66b 792 962 4,31 D. RIG FISNING Fish C tion 1,0717245 1 3" 1 579 1 14 1,217 70 Smismual Fish Su 6 8436 079 13 799 14 632 12,780 14,691 1,911 Smfamrl PriorityPollutant if 9,5862 15.0501 19,059 29.533 18 KS 19,694 1.249. Am st Nfet thol Studies 3,4159 i 5 774 B 492 8,740 9,612j a a./OA-QC/Px/DN 12 871 7 355 Sub total 20 91514 34 271 39 976 % 2M 53 9ffi 52 569 - Data Stora a Managemnt 97 81902 104 086 106 153 156 453 88 800 97 661Adtlitiarel Amml R rt A fraemt00 0 19 200 55 B02 0 0Pr ram Maregev t (PM)/Mo. R t. 42 622 31081Sub total 162 6S4 2L7 075 27L 578 342 680 410 567 322 708 360 499 F. AODITI DIAL SERVICES Liaison with District/Management 21.106 28.743 37.172 39 1 690 56 4117 39 672 9,354 -30 318 Quarterly Review Meeting with Distrl 7.111 10.2411 it 153 12 158 18 600 16,902 3,601 -13 301 Comers Reach, Copy of ReMrts 1 862 4101 393 0 0 0 0 CC Document Review 0 0 0 3,658 4.81 0 0 Pemit Reawlication Assistance 0 0 0 5,154 0 0 0 Contract Completion Activities 0 0 0 0 10.005 0 0 Program Mare ement (PM) 6 116 46 527 40 409 SW total 30.079 39.394 49.723. 60,660 89 909 62,692 59 482 -3 210 Equitzma,t Contingencies 0 10,300 10 300 10,223 6.132 01 0 Wssther Conti ion 0 10,3 10 300 10 225 6.1 0 0 Additional Studim B Costa Not Included 82,953 35.30 Ila 676 55 949 0 44 769 47,691 2 922 Profit 87 BM 1211,54 126.2 11 901 126 227-143 000-126 194 -16 ,806 Total with Amndmnts 8 Colloes 1,002,705 1,530,466 1 707 294 1 942 265 1 9; 570 1 821 365 1,356,923 35,55 (cmtingen:fes added) �� MM/au/REFa920095.XL7 EXHIBIT 3 SAIC PROGRAM COSTS BIATNIC N ITONIND T s 000,000 1,000,000 `..I 900,000 90D,000 800,000 g00,D00 700,000 700,000 S' WO,OOD mgigg 600,000 500,000 50D,000 400,Ono A00,000 300,000 300,000- 200,000 200,030 100,000 100,ODD 0001000 OO,COD Tmm- Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year < Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year < Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 WTFY QIALITT 6 Y3DI2ENTS DATA SIMUNY AND INTIRPNETATIOI 1.000,000 11000,003 90o,o00 900,0on 800,000 800,0Go 7OD,000 700,000 $ 6D0 000 rrwna 600,ODD 500:030 5D0,O00 i00,00o Veter 400,000 30D,0O0 300,ODD 200,000 200,000 100,ODD 100,000 000,000 000,ODD Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year A Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year G Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 ■I0 rI5N1ND ADD ITIO SERVICES 140,00o 140,ODa 12D,OOD 120,000 100,000 100,000 S 90,000 8D,000 IBM 60,000 60,000 40,000 40,00o on 20,000 2D,000 OO,000 a Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year < Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year L Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 OPTI OIS ROPI7 140,000 140,000 12D,000 12D,000 100,000 100,003 YS 80,000 80,000 60,000 60,D00 40,000 40,000 20,00D 20,000 00,000 00,00D Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 .Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year A Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 • Noce scale change for costs ,.........................._.. ..... ,se.mH u _ -- . ww - ; ,'.,,I_.••::iiifi:'n' iici!iliii=u=_::.. _ _::.. _.ae a!t:'ri= .._•: rill ... '=iiii�ii = - a - in ............................ ........................... :n:::!2E5iiiiii::FFii :,::,::::11._. ... ..... 11 Mimi !!iS .:_a::..ii... l�eF... . ... _a e ._.3....... ............:.......... ...... ....._........._........ .__. ::...:.................. ............ s:._._i_ _..._1V ---'---.....IiiF: :�slla;ti-4i! _ ,_a r : 2 — 'I' Iran x;l:i;: :iil r 1=i . I:; , :;:I a ; _ iii .. ,tiis `,:;iii e= ...................... ...... . .1. M a:a..a vi111C1:,: :4::a.C...:.L. :a::c3t..::..:i::is 'Ywnn: ..='a'i' };�1 _ _ _ -2-.....ii... i. i'!e!'uf :iii�" i�III� �111 li: ICI ; xt — w .w - N. �z 1 iiiei :_iliii;jlli�e&9J�It cill;!,i:. n�.:.."_- i ::l-:?;;:i, s` 'ii _F.iiilii[ i!ii!IiiinS!i!!a"E ...................... . . :i i!iii!ii=iiiiiie __ _ ...............:.:........ ........................... ......................_._: .i.a:::::, ; :::i?e'i �!5ieeiF 3Eja�iul; ............................ ..................... ... ................._.;; n � , 2. ..,::.L._ 1::iiiii :::ii:ii:iiiiiii:::wi i ...w::iiimi.ri_i.. .: s ' I I liiq,i::lr r. ,i lii :i i�:y::; :a ......................... m. _ I.i .. IL 77. :, ;i:!:lui; .i I :i Jn!?,,: :::I;;:,:11, :aa4.t:.. .,:.i�.;l�,i:ii;�r::ai: �i;;:rr ............................ :........................... .....i........_.a..., :........ . ii ., ............_..__ ...... ............................ ............................ ....................._ : R� I m ...... is riiiEiiii :,,:::;t!:::e::r�i;LLr. ......................_._. ,,,,Ili ...; lmmu ........................... .............:............. 1.....................k:;r .:wxi;ilil 7nry i.i.i:l: :i;irs:e':.M: .:I. ,a W- is............................ ...................... a _:::;�;_ :,::..... _ .._.9.. w w : : : :,, : : _a:�.R : sap:-3i :: ::: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA `.�• P.O.90%9127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92729-9127 10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92709-7019 (714)962-2411 May 22, 1991 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain valley, California 92708-7081 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Amendment No. 8 to Agreement with Science Application International Corporation (SAIL) for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 120-inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. S-032 In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engineering and architectural services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with Science Applications International Corporation to perform services for the seventh contract period as part of the Ocean Monitoring �..i Contract Services for the Districts' 120-inch ocean outfall in conformance with the requirements of the Environmental Protection Agency for a net amount not to exceed of $1,856,923 as follows: Contract Period 7 (1991-92 year) Preparation of equipment, conduct of field surveys, performance of data analysis and interpretations, reporting of results and recommendations: Basic Program Tasks (Labor & Other Direct Costs $1,430,128 Profit (Basic Program,.Tasks) 101,292 Water Quality Tasks (Labor & Other 252,910 Direct Costs) Profit (Water Quality Tasks) 21,857 Options - Trawl, Chem. QA, 47,691 Data Mgmt. Tasks Profit (Options Tasks) 3 .045 New Contract Amount $1.856.923• •Revised to reflect correction of original submittal from $1,857,225 to $1,856,923 for Year 7. Boards of Directors May 22, 1991 Page Two The selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the contractor. \S\ A.B. "Buck" Catlin \S\ William Mahoney A.B. "Buck" Catlin William Mahoney Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman \S\ Richard B. Edgar \S\ Don R. Griffin Richard B. Edgar Don R. Griffin Past Joint Chairman Past Joint Chairman \S\ Blake P. Anderson Blake P. Anderson Dir. of Technical Services IH:au REF1120541. 1tr -; RE : AGENDA ITEM NO . 13 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS e ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA tOBOO EWS GVENVE June 12, 1991 P.O.Box U127 FOUWWN VA¢ Y.uLIMMIA V7204127 ntn sszzan Joint Boards of Directors County S taticn Districts Los. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 of Orange County, California Subject: Summary Financial Report for Nine Months Ended March 31, 1991 Transmitted herewith is the Summary Financial Rat for nine months ended March 31, 1991. The statements EDIGOOSSr ze the fiscal activities of the joint cperatianES and the =dividUal Districts through the third quarter of the 1990-91 fiscal year and the status of each with respect to the approved budgets. The combined 1990-91 budget for all Districts is $575.0 ®.11i.ou, of whim approxiaately 63% is for Capital expenditures for facilities ia4aw®ents and additions, including reserves for said capital projects and borrowing. The tota l aL budgeted Ygeted rE aEdt Experse categories of he several Districts are set forth below. TABLE I COMPARATIVE BUDGET SUMMARY (MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) INCREASE 1990-91 REQUIREMENTS 1989-9D* 199041f (DECREASE) % OF BUDGET JOINT TREATMENT WORKS 0, M & R S 44.5 S 47.6 S 3.1 8.3% COLLECTION SYSTEM & OTHER DISTRICT O, M 8 6.9 10.8 3.9 1.9 TREATMENT PLANT CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATIONS 102.7 103.4 .7 18.0 DISTRICT SEWER CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATIONS 36.9 37.3 .4 6.5 DEBT SERVICE (G.O. & C.O.P.) 12.0 50.8 38.8 8.8 SUB-TOTAL $203.0 1249.9 S 4.6.9 43.5% CONSTRUCTION RESERVES $ 67.8 9224.4 $156.6 39.0% OTHER RESERVES 44.9 100.7 55.8 17.5 SUB-TOTAL $112.7 $325.1 $212.4 56.5% TOTAL REQUIREMENTS $315.7 S575.0 S259.3 100.G% FUNDING CARRY-OVER S 43.0 S 71.3 $ 28.3 12.4% APPROPRIATED RESERVES 169.4 101.3 (68.1) 17.6 SUB-TOTAL $212.4 S 172.6 S(39.8) 30.0% TAX ALLOCATION (i% SHARE) S 29.7 $ 32.8 S 3.1 5.7% TAX LEVY FOR BOND REDEMPTION 0.2 --- ( .2) --- CONSTRUCTION GRANTS 2.7 1.0 (1.7) .2 FEES 49.6 71.4 21.8 12.4 BORROWING --- 265.0 265.0 46.1 INTEREST & OTHER 21.1 32.2 11.1 5.6 SUB-TOTAL $103.3 $ 402.4 $299.1 70.0% TOTAL FUNDING $315.7 $ 575.0 $259.3 100.0% f ADJUSTED FOR INTER-DISTRICT TRANSACTIONS Summary Financial Report w June 12, 1991 Included in each District's statement is a summary of the above major income and expense categories and an itemization of their trunk sewer construction projects and respective share of the joint works expansion. Authorized general reserves and inter-fund transfers have been excluded from the budget column on said statements as expenditures are not charged directly against such appropriations. Summarized below are comments relative to the financial statements. The statements are presented on an accrual basis and, therefore, inter-district cash transactions for fiscal 1990-91 which were accrued in 1990-91 are not reflected in the year-to-date balances. CASH AND INVESTMENTS Earned interest generated by our continuing program of investing reserve fords (primarily capital funds accumulated for construction of required sewerage facilities) is $12.5 million through the third quarter of the year. Virtually 100% of our funds are invested in short-tero government securities or time deposits. As of March 31, 1991, 90% of cur funds were invested with the County Treasurer's commingled investment program. The ruining 10% of fords, representing the debt service reserve for the 1986 OOP issue and the unspent proceeds of the 1990-92 Series A issue, is held and invested by the trustees for each issue. JOINT OPERATING, FMD This find accounts for operations, maintenazxJe, and administrative activities relative to the Districts' jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities. The JO expenditures along with the self-funded insurance program costs are monitored by the Fiscal Policy Committee and if some unexpected expenditures are experienced they are reviewed by the Committee. Salaries and Waves - Even though we have had to add employees, there are several authorized but unfilled positions arid, thus, some payroll savings have been realized to date. Employees' Benefits - Includes Retirement., Workers' Compensation, Une ploym=t Insurance, Croup Medical Insurance and Uniforms. Charvebacks to Districts and CDRF - Payroll expenses are charged back to CM through the cost accounting system for work on the treatment plants' capital expansion program, and to individual Districts for work on Districts' collection facilities capital expansion projects as well as maintenance and repair of said systems. Source control division charges to respective Districts are also included in these chargebacks. Gasoline. Oil s Fuel - Includes all fuel for motor pool. A large portion is recovered through our e qT** billing system and included in revenue below. -2- L Smeary Financial Report. June 12, 1991 `� rnm,ranrn - Budget amount includes Board and staff out-of-county travel policy, employee fidelity, boiler, fire, earthquake and all risk insurance policies, and pro-rata cost of the self-funded Liability insurance program. Expense is in line with annual budget. Memberships - includes the cost of membership in CASA, AMSA, SAREPA, WateReuse and other organioAtions. Annual membership costs are recorded when paid. Office FSmense - This account includes various types of office supplies, stationery and related items. Chlorine and Odor Control Chemicals - Primarily for influent and sludge odor control at treatment plant sites. The main chemicals used to control odors are chlorine, ferrous chloride and hydrogen peroxide. Ferric chloride is used as a supplemental Odor control chemical , and —„stir soda is a190 used in air scrubbers throughout the plants to reduce hydrogen sulfide emissions. New air scrubbers are proving to be less costly to operate than anticipated. Chemical Coagulants - Expenditures for this item are required to dewater our sludges prior to disposal to comply with Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements. other Operating Supplies - Miscellaneous item such as solvents, cleaners, janitorial, tools, lab chemicals, etc. purchased throughout the year. Contractual Services - The major elements in this Line item are payment for grit and waste-activated sludge removal and disposal at the BRR landfill and payment for off-site sludge removal and reuse. Professional Services - Primarily consists of General Counsel's fees, audit fees, and miscellaneous consulting services. Printing and PubLications - Includes all reproduction activities in-house and with outside services. Rents and Leases - Frn,irnnnt Outside Fg ,z=.,,ent Rental - Primarily for the rental of large cranes and equipment necessary for removing and replacing major pumps, engines and other large equipment during the course of maintenance and ,epa r operations. CSDOC Equipment Rental - Reflects the charges for District-oaned eq pment used for overhead type activities. There is an offsetting credit applied through the cost allocation system for these charges. -3- N%.Ol Summary Financial Report June 12, 1991 Repairs and Maintenance - This item includes parts and supplies for repair of plant facilities. Escalating costs crontinue to have a significant impact on this item. Generally this accatuit runs close to budget each year due to the unnpredictahi7ity of major equipment failures. Research and Moni torirn - Budget includes funds for the ocean monitoring contract required by our BPDES permit. Other projects include rneratinnal research and evaluation of processes to develop optimum operating parameters, and also include the Districts' annual share of pa++__ipatim. in the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. Travel. Meetings & - Major item are authorized by specific Board actions. Expanding activities of regulatory agencies have required additional staff and Board travel. Utilities - The major item in the Utilities Expenee Account is for purchased electrical. power. Future expenses are expected to remain within the budget Limits. Other Expenses - For item not chargeable elsewhere such as freight, safety supplies, etc. Prior Year's n'.rr»*sa - This account is required by the Uniform Accounting System and represents adjustments to an operating or non-aperating account balance from the previous year or payment of charges which could not be accrued at year end. Generally, all expenses to this account are reoorded in the first quarter. Allocation to Districts and CORE - n s is an account established in connection with the cost accounting system and represents materials, supplies, and services overhead chargebacks to the individual Districts and Cam'. CAPMAL BUMM REWGVI% FUND This fund accounts for the costa of expanding and improving the Districts' jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities and represents an average of 17.9% (excluding reserves) of each District's budget requites is for 1990-91. During the first nine months, $60.2 million was expended on joint works treatment and disposal facilities improveg t and expansion projects. The pro-rats share of joint works improvement and expansion costa is reflected in the financial statements of the respective Districts. DMIVIDUAL DISTRICTS - The statements reflect the accounting transactions for the nine Districts and include each respective District's share of the Joint Operating Fund and the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund. -4- - S:amiary Financial Report June 12, 1991 �yJ Taxes: Tax revenue is allocated to two separate accounts: Tax Allocation - This account represents the anticipated allocation of the Districts' pro rate share of the „axi= 18 basic property tax allowed under Proposition 13. The Districts average a prr minutely 2.9% ($.029 for each $1.00) of the basic levy. Tlax - This account represents tax funds necessary to make voter-approved outstanding general obligation bond principal and interest payments. In accordance with the Jarvis-Gann initiative, tax levies to satisfy these obligations are not restricted. The 1990-91 levy was waived for District 7, and debt service is being financed by interest on reserve funds. Federal and State Construction Grants - EPA and SWRCB have historically funded up to 87}8 of treatment plant construction for approved projects. The budgeted amount is the outstanding balance on projects pending final EPA and SWECB review. Flees - All Districts now have an adopted, uniform sewer connection fee schedule. This account also reflects industrial waste use charges levied by seven of the nine Districts pursuant to the Uniform Industrial Waste Ordinance and the Revenue Program, and the user fees inplemented in Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 11 and 13. Annexation fee revenue is unpredictable and, thus, is not included in the budgets unless there is an existing agreement providing for payment of fees. sale of Capacity Rights - This account records inccue from sale of capacity rights to outside agencies such as SAWPA, including the capital replareuent charge. Joint Works Fquity Sale - Revenue from the annual joint facilities interdistrict equity adjustment required by the recalculation of the respective ownership percentages. Cost of this adjustment for purchasing Districts is included in each District's Share of Joint Works Construction. Share of Joint Works Construction - Represents each District's share of joint treatment and disposal facilities expansion discussed above under Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF). Bond Retirement and Interest Expense - Payment of principal and interest on outstanding general obligation bonds and certificates of participation of the respective Districts. Annual budgeted expense for all Districts is approximately $50.8 million. -5- �i� SMVary Financial Report June 12, 1991 Share of Joint Operating - Represents each District's share of operating and maintaining the jointly owned treatment and disposal facilities, and administrative activities. Costs are distributed based upon each District's respective gallonage flow (see Joint Operating Fund statement for details). District Operating and other Expenditures - Consists primarily of individual Districts' general operating expenses, industrial monitoring, operations, naintenance and repair of the respective Districts' collection systems. -6- QTR.RFTS91/QM6.12-17 . 1 fOWI OAIIIA714 Oinllnt Of OWn Cmu OMIT ngW Onu7nG21021110 WITH n1014He Will 9 4 l Wlo 1111191 Ali APPnpto Omti iHe-4-4t1 HWu04 HAFng-oAH 1990-11 WWnms 14W HeP le ........ ........... .......... .........--- IRWIN, Into 6limits .......................... hlhies I will, 21,221,000 14,927,010 6,101,150 61.151 Psnell haeflth 5,051,04 1,612,65E 1,121,301 71.111 ............ ............ ............ ............ T"A PAHHL 16,116,Oa 31,160,502 7,025,111 70.111 RON: Harpoon to FISH I nH 11,000,0001 15,002jal 11,H7,041 71AII ............ ............ ............ ............ ILO loin OP1411RO PAfngLL 19,206,000 13.457,536 5.121,464 69.711 -------'--. ............ ............ ............ unWLl, IUPPLIIA I111Nit11 .............................. Wallow. all 6 alone 250,00E 1161161 113,031 55.17E Norio,, 600.000 151,171 1161129 15.11E leWeratlpe 50,00E 19,617 10,161 65.16% Offln hpoH 105,000 175145 1.195 95.011 Catarina I OOor Cartel 11105,000 1,574,613 11721,327 (7.705 neatcil CalaLOth 2.170.000 1,16f,526 1.293,171 19.22% Other Operating lopplle, 61L000 "FAIR II51560 12.61E Cootrlllotl Fennel, 7,911,000 1,611.999 1,211,a1 59.IIt Professional Benin, 1,271,000 760,205 506,711 60.16E Printing I Publication )50,000 211,11E 111,60E 61.11E Iltipsat Rental 215,100 1591221 15,771 61.99E UNIT,I NI011aene 1,195,Ooa 2,211,115 I,510,665 60.101 leleerca 1 haltering 2,611,500 1,110,165 161,015 11.411 trnel, Noting t ffiaho 175,00E nS,171 59,221 60.411 Oncollotuble Accents 1,00E 0 I'm 0.001 Utilities 6,115,no 1,501,01E 2,116,96E 55.291 Other Inner, 61L00 111,196 211,10E 64.68% Prior fan hpmte $0,000 110,00E In,0001 120,00E 1 j toe mrstlq Iryaus 11=000 17.666 -n.6661 105.121 `V inn 4n11ALl i limits 10,921,00E 16,001,119 12,911,111 51.11E Use! ALLOCATION 7O OIIf61 ten 1600,000E 251,19E 185I.H11 111.9211 ............ ............ ............ ............ Ot lom out Wilule I Helene 10,121,On 11120427 12,060,311 10.21E ----........ ............ ............ ............ inAL loin OPlufin 4FIn11 0,607,00E 31,711,163 17,011,137 61.91E ............ ............ ............ ........---- uHeHe lenaau 11,0051001 12,131,127) 111,827 106.721 hat: All ntia to 0rift I may S,u0 6,65E 11,657E 11E.141 ............ ............ ............ ......------ W BOIn Opening Hume 12,000,000E 12,121,1701 11E,170 101.66E ............ ............ ............ ............ ui l01n n14911G Willis 17,601,0H E9,501,991 11,022,007 62,11E 011=1 life N.C. I IN HARRIS ..................................... ............................................. aI41ICT mm 10 4n pnW 70 4n ........ ............ ............ ............ ............ 1 10.1E1 7,71E I,ISI,an 2,915,al 1 11,171 21.0E 14,931,000 9,172,07E E 11.517 21,10E 15,096,000 9,229,115 f 1,161 1,59E 21316,000 1,111,20E 6 5.174 1,1E 2'vo'000 1,09,75o 7 7,662 5,61E 11HO,He 1,21,529 II 6,211 1,611 1,975,000 1,159.210 Il 642 Its Io1,000 169,5I5 11 1,119 1,96E 718.000 712,471 `�✓ ............ ------------ ............ ............ 99,291 71,207 17,607,C00 n,511,19E CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SUMMARY OF JOINT NORMS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS SCHEDULE B-1 FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 9 MONTHS ENDED 3/3119L Page I of 4 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) YOA3 ( ) ESTIMATED REQUIRED ACCUMULATED ; CURRENT YEAR ; COMPLETED JOBS ; PROJECT UNEXPENDED ONOER ( ( PR04ECT BUDGET i COST i OUTLAT i TRANSFER TO COST BIAM EI ( i TOTAL i 1990-91 i E 6130/90 TO 3/31191'( FIXED ASSETS ; TO DATE ( 1 - 3 _.._...._ i i------------- ) ------------ ------------ ------------ i -------------- i ............ i ----._------ i 1. New and Rebudgeted Major Projects A. Reclamation Plant 1 1. Headworks No.2 B Plant No.l, PI-20/P1-31 53702-0/51993.0 ; ; 39,268,126 ; $00,000 ; 39,892,057 92,037 ; 0 ; 39,984,894 ; 407,163 ) 2. Nastehauler Disposal 6 Sample Stn PI.27-112/3 519424,8 1 1 3,040,423 ; 500,000 857,373 518,929 ( 0 ) 1,376,342 ( (18,929) ) 3. Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15. PI-33 53709-0 ( ( 41,789,972 ; 11,000,000 17,05B,948 16,591,034 i 0 ; 33,649,982 ; 40B,966 ) 4. Gas Handling Facilities, PI-34-1 S3110-A ) ( 14,416,910 ; 7,000,000 ; 2,686,096 ; 6,571,973 ) 0 ) 9,258,969 ( 428,027 5. Sludge Handling Facilities, P1-34-2 $3710-8 ( ( 20,821,504 ; 8,000,000 ; 9,593,516 10,142,748 ; 0 ; 19,736,264 1 (2,142,748) ; 6. Digesters 11-16, PI-34-3 53110-C (.( 32,001,665 ; 7,000,000 1,457,753 744,986 ( 0 ; 2,202,739 ; 6,255,014 ; 7. Rehabilitation of Digesters 7 6 8, PI-35-1 52044.0 ( ; 2,347,809 50,000 2,828,857 B8,082 ; 0 ; 2,916,939 ; (39,082) A. Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 6 10, PI.35-2 52044-A ; ; 3,500,000 ; 0 0 300,119 ; 0 ; 300,119 ; (300,119) ; 9. Secondary Trot Expansion to 80 NGD, PI-36 53717.0 ; ( 31,164,015 600,000 ! 794,693 1,568,713 ( 0 ; 2,363,406 ) (968,113) ; 10. Primary Treatment 12 NGD Expansion, P1-37 53719-0 ; ) 34,000,000 1,000,000 1,199 ; 1,439,506 ( 0 ; 1,440,705 (439,506) ; 11. Rise. Modification, PI-38 52108-A ; ) 10,003,211 1,000,000 18,108 24,387 ) 0 ; 42,495 975,613 ; 12. Security 6 Landscaping, P1-38-1 ) ) 1.800,000 ; 500,000 0 0 ( 0 ; 0 500,000 ; 13. Earthquake Mork, PI-38-2 ( ; 1,900,000 ; 400,000 0 0 ; 0 ; 0 400,000 ; 14. Seismic Upgrading 6 Structural Nark, PI-38-3 52125-B ( ( 3,000,000 ; 700,000 0 47,885 ) 0 ; 47,085 652,115 ; 15. Fuel System Improvements, R-033-1 51962.0 ( ( 222,931 200,000 103,668 115,302 ( 0 i 210,970 04,698 16. 40 MGD Oxygen Activated Sludge 6 DAF's ; ( 66,000,000 0 0 0 ( 0 ; 0 0 ; 17. Belt Presses (4 Units) i i 15,500,000 1 0 i 0 0 1 0 0 ) 0 19. Solids Storage (4 Bins) ; ; 11,000,000 ; 0 0 0 ) 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 19. Digesters: 2 1 110' Diameter ; ; 9,200,000 ; 0 0 0 ( 0 ; 0 ; 0 20. Standby Power Generation ; ( 7,735,000 ; 0 0 1 ; 0 ; 0 1 0 ; 21. 12kv Electrical Power Distribution ( ; 2,800,000 0 0 / ; 0 ; 0 0 ; 22. Electrification Project i i 2,250,000 200.000 0 ; .0 ( 0 ( 0 200,000 23. Raw Sewage Emergency Bypass ( ( 2,000,000 0 0 ; 0 ; 0 1 - 0 ; 0 24. Remove Trickling Filters 1 6 3 i i 1,300,000 ; 0 0 ) 0 ( 0 ; 0 ) 0 ; 25. Central Air Compressor Station ; ; 250,000 1 0 ; 0 ( 0 ) 0 ) 1 i 0 i 26. Misc. Projects (See Schedule C) i i 10,250,000 1,000,000 ) 71,481 ( 57,103 ( 0 ( 120,664 i 942,817 ----------- ---------- ) -•-------- ( ---------- ( ---------- , ---------- i .---..----- , SUB-TOTAL - RECLAMATION PLANT 1 1 :367,501,566 ) 45,650.000 75,364,549 ( 38,303,684 i 0 )113,668,233 ( 7,346,316 i ii ----------- ---------- i ---------- i •--------- i ---------- 1 .......... i ----------- i CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS SCIEDULE 8.1 FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 9 MONTHS ENDED 3/31/91 Page 2 Of 4 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) WORK i ESTIMATED ( REQUIRED ( ACCUMULATED CURRENT YEAR COMPLETED JOBS i PROJECT i UNEXPENDED ORDER PR03ECT ( BUDGET COST OUTLAY TRANSFER TO COST ( SUDNET ( ; TOTAL 1990-91 i 1 6/30/90 TO 3/31/91 ( FIRED ASSETS TO DATE ( 1 - 3 ..._..... ( (------------- i ------------ i ------------ i ------------ i -------------- i -----------• i ------------ 0. Treatment Plant 2 1. Support Facilities and Site Improvements 0 ( a. Operations Building, P2-23-5-1 S3715-0 i 3,625,000 100,000 13,102 i 43,651 0 56,75S 56,349 b. Warehouse Building, P2-35-2 51813-H ( ( 5,264,000 250,000 2,354 i 12,295 i 0 14,639 i 237.715 c. Maintenance Building , P2.35-3 51813-F ; ; 5,264,000 250,000 2,354 ; 11,351 ( 0 ; 13.705 ; 238,649 ; d. Construction Management Office, P2.35.4 51813-4 ; 1,302,000 0 ; 2,354 ; 8,435 ; 0 ; 10,799 ; (8,435) ; e. Phase 11 Site and Security Improvements, P2.35-5 51613-E ; ; 2,305,000 ; 100,000 ; 3,033 ; 8,615 ; 0 ; 11,640 ; 91,385 ; 2. Misc Nod. 6 Improvements to Facilities, P2-37 51979.0 ; ; 8,158,000 1,000.000 7,556,322 ; 302,621 ; 0 ; 7.858.943 ; 697,379 J. Rehab Digester I, J, K, P2.39-1 (P2-39 Design Only) S2045.0 i 3,387,000 ; 1,500,000 194,970 ; 18,023 ; 0 412,993 i 1,401,977 ; 4. Rehab Digester L, M, P2-39-2 i 31000,000 0 0 0 i 0 i 0 i S. Rehab Digester N, 0, P2-19.3 ; ; 4,000.000 ; 0 0 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 6. Process Control Improvements, P2-40 51868-1 431,000 250,000 106,21D 150,540 0 ) 256,750 i 99,460 7. Primary Treatment 24 NOD Expansion, P2-41 53114.0 i i 15,000,000 0 ; 0 0 0 0 ; 0 ; 8. Secondary Treataent Expansion, P2-42 $3718-0 ; ( 21,214,000 2,000,000 359,935 674,228 0 ; 1,034,163 ; 1,325,772 Transfer t0 Project Below ; ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; P2-42.2A Furnish aM Install Secondary Clarifier ( i I i 0 0 Sludge Collection Equipment S3718-1 ; ; 2.018.000 0 ; 0 ; 0 0 9. Electrification Project, P2.42.1 S37I8-A ; ; 14,000,000 1,000,000 1,921 i 11,409 0 ; 21,330 ; 980,591 10. Misc. Modifications, P2-43-1 52108-2 ; ; 3,509,000 ; 500,000 16,971 ( 17,695 ; 0 ; 34,666 ; 482,305 ; 11. Earthquake Work, P2.43-2 52106-C ; ; 3,000,000 500,000 ; 0 ; 77.524 0 77,524 ; 422,476 ; 12. Seismic Upgrading 6 Structural Work, P2.43-1 ( i 4,305,000 ; 705,000 ; 0 ; 0 0 ; 0 i 705,000 13. Monitoring/Control System, P2-44 52094.0 ( i 4,010,000 ; 2,000,000 ; 54,056 ; 20,322 0 ; 74.378 i 1,979,678 ; 14. Fuel System Improvements, R-033-2 51962-N ; ; 263,000 150,000 34.480 i 133,646 0 ; 168,126 ; 16,354 ; 15. Standby Power Generation ( ( 9,200,000 0 0 0 0 0 ; 0 16. Solids Storage: 2 gins ; ; 5,200,000 ; i 0 0 I 0 ; 0 ; 17. Additional 105 Foot Digester ( ( 4,000,000 ( 0 0 ( 0 0 18. Potable Water Distribution System ( 3,800,000 0 0 ( 0 0 ( 0 0 19. Plant Water Pump Station ; ; 1,200,000 ; ; i 0 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 20. Misc. Projects (See Schedule 0) ( ( 10,400,000 1,000,000 $12,493 ( 409,753 0 722,246 i 590,247 SUB-TOTAL - TREATMENT PLANT 2 ( :137,035,000 11,305,000 6,860,5S5 i 1'"0.098 0 ) I0,169,653 ( 9,396,902 ii ------•---- ---------- ---------- ---------- i .......... i ---------- i ----------- i CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SMAAY Of JOINT NOW(CONTRACTION REYUiMMMt aNEME B-1 FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 9 MINS UNDID 3131/91 Has 3 a1 a (1) (!) (3) (6) (5) (6) MR I WNW I MUIM i MMUHIm I C SM 1 Mpu m Jobs I PMmt I "Immu, I no I I WANC I Mn CEOT I AN Y 1 M OTO TO ME i M6EI I { rout i IfN9l i 1 6W/90 i m 3131191 i rim MMM I ID M[ I 1.3 I C.ASim Whi IHnI Sim ---^ -"•"^ 1.Sim Mtvlsllian i MM,M i S.M.M t { ' i S,M.M I , { { 3.HAWmiRO/lmt 3 MN-A 1 {61.0111,0110 i Im,M I 1 1 IN,M { a i ------ i (Saul) I M-TOTAL- AECIAMTHA PLANTS { {",M.M i 5.1110,001, i 0 i Iss'M I 0 i WITH i 1.915.2113 I _.......... i.........^ D. Intarollot$a DOING fuililiu 1. Interplant Fallita, 1-9 WIN i i mom" i 0 i HIM ' WITH i O { 431.231 i (553451) i A. I20-InmrpllAl It. I i 11,015,041) i A.M.M ; 0 j 0 { 0 ' 0 4.000,000 A. INHulal Utility CHAR 16.60,M I I.M.M I 0 1 0 ; 0 1 0 I.M.M I a. IMostrlAl Voter Lim i 3.MIM i I'M.M 0 0 0 I 0 I I.MMM A.Digester GUN Lim i 1,000,M M,M 0 0 0 0 500,000 A.CAanialiom Col. 1m,m0 Ho,M 0 0 0 0 Im.M g.almrt fuililiu ad Site laresenats i i { 0- 0 { 0 0 0 A.moo.ONI]Oiq[man.A bash.,3-7-4,J-I-5 SIM-0II i { SIRu,M ' I,M,M 5,015.M i I.M.M ' 0 i 6.Su,M i (M,M) I T.f.,to Plaint BUT. I (RIM i 0 ' ' (6,222) i M Solf hma.Tumury Ca nap$ 511371 SIM i SIM I H.uB { 0 1 14,03 I TRIALS) i A.HMO/tons[at Lab H Offim at Pit I.J-11.1 MM-0 1 i 601,M i 0 i JIM i 9.10 0 i IMM i (9110) I A.unlnl IAAamHFI,1-17 small i ' 1,319,418 1 a.M,M { 1,574.7541 i NITRATIONS I 0 i 4,166,01/ i 1,401,735 i A. Wreasse/IMinleuae lid, 6 Oil DM, 3-20 S19W0 i{ l,R51,Su i M,M i J,mT,mf i tu.310 { 0 i 41357I47 i (l56,u0) I A. Dpenflam/Conlml limo J-N-P1 M112IM I I a,H9,0CD i I,M,OM i AS,AM i 12.02 { 0 i 41.720 i 1.411.1,4611 i I."nand WISH,At Pit 1. J-26 51116-0 i i I.M.M i I00.M i 5.237 i 10.16 { 0 i GRIND! AMMS i I.D000lilim of WPPlrt lail6lm Al Plat A,$11 Sam-0 i SI'ml i 2.3% i 1.0 { 0 i 10.07 I (BIM) i a.CROWD Innatian FoUlt, a 1 0 1 0 I 0 1 a I A. Euiplad PaprChom. )-IRO N -E i i 20.0i'M ' SIM,M 16,909,M ; 3.440.M { 0 i 20,30.773 i 1.M.E55 I A. uiulen Wa0as6. J-190 SARI-AIB i 13du,M i 3.M.M i 0 { O J 3,M,M i 0 i coo plat 1 FASHION.J-191 SMR-a i i 16.12S.I22 I f,M,M 1,461,211'3 i M.ml ' 0 i J,Iu,M MINION i 0. Plot failiV.J-19-2 SNM-1 i i m.HB,ri1 i B,M.M i 1,400,071 i T."i'N I 0 ' H.tM,311 i 15.757 ; 1.1.1 to IaaJM Bel. I II,040.0001 I I U,aaD,Ml I EpHaias MMI ter NW te.Mmy",am. 531m1 11,00,00 i l,mo.m in { 753 1.011,247 i a.NUH Hs]lame,Jdl,J-21A MO-0 ; ?".All { M.M 1 30Mam i 93.4" { 0 1 3111,3941 I Su,M i S.Wall I BMHr ANON$Hilo. 0 { 0 i 0 i 0 1 0 1 O I A.HFIWHnt H m'WAIT Auer.J-22-1 (IM) SMI-0 I i I.M,M i I'M.M i 2,II0.I1s6 { !.M ' 0 i 2.112.10 i 91171W 1 A.Repine talfatl to. 1 HM Hatla,J-m-! l,M,M { 0 { 0 i 0 1 0 i 0 i 0 i A.No.Sn'"T.er H. 1.J-22-3 a,M,M ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 A.loop LIJ Station for Wtlall No. 1 ?,M.M 0 0 E I 0 0 0 e.hand DmAhArgp super MS'L- a.M,M 0 0 ' 0 I 0 ' 0 0 I. WAIT TO, H map liter with IRO'WtfM 10,00D,M { 0 a 0 { 0 0 i 0 i f.lnlloeot flweNr M mt frt5lityd-24/31A/348 520WO 5I4.0 { WITH { M.M 229,2I11 { 0 SM.113 { FINISH i 1.Promotion of Utility Atlas.J-25 582164 i i J.M.M i M.M { 0 I ]MIA 1 0 1 11,1311 1 64,162 i B.Te1mAOAA/Telentq/HniHriq Erm"I" 1 3.M.M { M.M { 0 ' 0 ' 0 i 0 1 M,M 3 9.W UWNM NAa.tOnt Hmater Has. M.M MIM 0 I 0 I 0 0 M.M 10.B.MrO lGorplut Front Aeplam.t ; uIM,M a 0 0 ; O O 0 13.[]atrial Pool SlItM HINGAilitam SHOIu a,M,M 0.0 0 0 O 0 M,M N. $loop Miami From" i t 0 0 1 A 6 0 0 A.MOM O nstmHRO Plat { 9100,11011 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 A. LAM AmuHilian ' i 23,040,00 ' 0 0 0 ( O 0 0 a.LAWflll HAAlo.mt PAW 1 i 25.640.01" ! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.(Wan Fullity 1 H.M.M ' 0 0 0 0 0 H.Ilia P.Hda,(tee WWHIA E) i i 10.10.M I I.M.M { ll$.96 i 119.1M i -----— ;--m,lfa i M.HR I M-IM '3APIIH 1 JOINT ;IN9.u3-M1 i P.M.M ; 1l,MM ; m= .1--- --0 1....51,M` ;-9.M.... ' M-TART u mM[tif { 910 fm M n,M M :INSTITUTIONS I m, 0 iM,M.M a1,N1,M CAP LOILAY REVOLVING FUND l SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS SCHEDULE B-1 FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 9 MONTHS ENDED 3/31191 Page 4 of 4 (1) (2) (3). (4) (5) (6) WORK ESTIMATED 1 REQUIRED ACCUMULATED I CURRENT YEAR ( COMPLETED JOBS PROJECT UNEXPENDED ; ORDER i PROJECT 1 BUDGET COST OUTLAY ) TRANSFER TO i COST BUDGET ( ( TOTAL 1 1990.91 0 6130190 TO 3/31/91 ( FIXED ASSETS 10 DATE I - 3 2. Special Projects, Studies 6 Research i i i i i 0 A. Action Plan - AIDES Permit Application 582094 ; ; 276,000 ; 75,000 ; 167,666 ; 51,914 0 ( 219,580 ; 23,086 ; j i i i i i 0 i S. Solids Treatment and Disposal Projects 0 ; 1. Sludge Disposal Projects ; ; 680,000 ; 25,000 ;� 0 ; 0 ( 0 (� 0 ) 25,000 Transfer to Projects Below i i 0 ) 0 ( �� Solids Disposal Phase III- Landfill Option SB201-A ; 15,611 ; 0 ) 0 15,611 0 Sludge Disposal Related Projects 58214.0 ; 162,000 102,655 92,742 ( 0 ; 195,397 (92,742) 2. Sludge Reuse Projects ( I 600,000 25,000 0 0 ) 0 ) 0 25.000 C. peep Ocean Disposal Evaluation 51759-0 2,229,000 50,000 ; 578,529 0 ; 0 ( 518,529 50,000 ) j i i i i 0 i 0 i D. Air Quality Control Program ; ; 3,224,000 ; ; 0 ; 0 ; 1. Air Tonics Inventory (AB2588 a/ PEEP) 50218-0 ; ; 1,975,000 ; 925,000 ; 150,238 ; 559,414 ; 0 709.652 365,586 ; Transfer to Project Below ; (423,142) ; ; ( 0 ; (423,142) ; Air Tonics Emissions Inventory Report (REIN) and Health Risk Assessment (HRA) 58218-A ; ; 423,142 ; 423,142 ( 0 ; 0 ; 423,142 2. VOC/ROQ BACT Demonstration Program ( ( 600,000 ; 50,000 0 ( 0 ; 0 ) 0 50,000 3. Future Projects i i 3,500,000 i ( 0 0 E. Chemical Handling and Control Improvements ( ' 100.000 10.000 0 ( 0 j 0 0 10,000 i F. Central Laboratory Development Program 55,000 ; 25,000 ; 0 000,25 0 0 0 ; ; � i ; i i i i i i 0 i 0 G. Hater Conservation Projects 1,220,000 ( 70.000 0 0 0 0 70,000 ( 0 0 H. Hater Reclamation R&D and Spec Projects ; ; 900,000 ( 100,000 0 ; 0 0 ) 0 100,000 SUB-IOIAL - SPECIAL PROJECTS ---------- ; 1,355,--- ( 1,014,--- ; 704,070 0 1,718, 650,93--- - 3. Equipment Rees i ; 39,224---- = --------- ------- ; 964,35- (954,4--- 561,12- ---1,297, r , SUBTOTAL • JOINT WORKS COASTRUCTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS :965,8.38,222 :103,422,000 :128,445,516 ; 60,142,335 (954,466) :181,623,385 1 43,289,665 i CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS COMPLETED AT 6/30/90 SCHEDULE F ; ; ; 57.819,064 ; 82,631 ; (26,387,893) 31,513,802 (82,631) ; TOTAL JOINT WORKS CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS I :965,938,222 :103,422,000 :186.264.580 60,214,966 (27,342,359) :219,137,187 ) 43.207,034 T mnILIN omen is 1 c loam a I3/11/91 Gilt 9 IDme IncN 3/11/91 NNn Bnin - ......... \� ID90.91 lentou/ leer-U-Date Bodget leer-TG-Date Bo/pet 1 INtided . ....... ............ ......... ............ Iololo road eel....., J.17 1 IB,ON,701 IIp110I0: In 1m [Bond Radio) Gall) 0 I,133 13.11i1 D.ON Tti Alleerttwe/IobnabloDs labile Of 111 7,063,00E 1,110,731 957,264 51.111 Indent Bad Store CGestnatln Great 100,000 11130 93,570 6.431 Correction in, 456.000 300 155,700 0.071 Otter Nee 11645,000 I,193,1n 1,752,116 61.191 Bell of Capacity lights 1,061,000 11,617 1,012.173 iJil teleran B Aln. Receipts 11177,000 1,546,559 (69,069) 104.71% Other 511,ND 1 511,000 O.ODI ............ ............ ............ ............ Total meet, 10,313,000 5,607,NB 4,725,192 51.18% ..... ............ _....:_::_:: ............ Patel mein B Bpinnlag silence, 21.611,109 ............ mmITW9: IOant of Joint Witte Tat. Plot a Interval 1119561P00 610091371 12,916161I 20.751 District truck Bever(Pntr I Instinct 11359.010 17,783 11716,217 1.071 Boni Robinson Gail tourist INeae 6,071,000 11011,256 51060,741 16.651 share of JoFat Ron$Operating bpna, 6n1.000 2.915,607 1,911,313 60.41% Iranian for Itloaatleat Aneeveuu 0 0 0 0.001 District Operating a Other Npodltaae MAN 251,)39 301,661 I1.I51 ............ ............ ............ ............ total nnodltarn 11.611,000 10,770,363 31,473,637 11.511 ............ _...... radial Brad prince, 17,391,111 UICUNNS mAmN �✓ ................................................................................................................................................... Balance Illusion, transfer TO Baltic, IIIlso a Addition. find",at, 3/31/91 ....... ........... ............ ....... [E/n10t}IOA 1B PBNII6B: ........................ 1-I6 IA/Dyer N?red Indtfleatln, 1,031 12,711 14,771 ............ ............ ............ ............ Fah-Total 1,930 11,703 0 11,131 ............ ............ ............ ............ Thane of Joan gore 11,5u.601 6,OD9,371 II17001339) 21,676.740 ............ ............ ............ ............ IGb-Tet l 11,567,601 6,009,176 1711001I391 11.8761710 ............ ............ ............ ............ NnLmD fMIm, PM I IQDIP: .................................. Lead and Property stght, 81,398 21,316 collection its.. ad tap area. 51779,133 1,779,133 Treatoon Facilities O 0 Disposal Facilities 11,513 t1,593 central Plot and again. Beall. 35,316 35,156 INlty it Joint aeaaal leell. 35,791,619 1110,5041 717001139 39.397,114 Other bleb at Cost Loll ANrt. 31,165 112.3111 19,153 ............ ............ ............ ............ Total Property Plat a yelp. 60,306,061 5,199,765 0 66,205,406 > am @n111N DinlhT RA. 1 mklT 00@lell n@ew awn 9 am MM 1131191 ................................................................................................... 600@ IIUW ..._..........._............_......._._.._. I910-it M1101M IM-70-111te Idot Twr-h-0eM Fillet A BepnFld Beginning Ford Baltic,,, July 1 121.1311.310 I19IIOIl: Fee toy (Bad hedpl alyl 0 0 n D.Det 1n Alladlns/Fihlatiea phut of 111 B,w.nO 5.547,161 3.261,231 52.991 Pedal] w SUIT mutnniaa grain 106,000 11,166 261,534 6.461 Waterloo fete 1,959,000 1.711.131 3,211,111 15.09t Other Iese 17,117,00E 11,313,641 5,113,35E Will Pelt of Castle,tights 3,317,000 139.1N 3,117,61E I.201 Interest I We. geaelpts 1,101,000 I,nE.@ 111,261 Mile Ocher 617,n0 0 697,@ D.nt ............ ......._... ....._..... ............ fail lever" 311111,DOD 12,112.135 17,265,063 56.161 :: -•":hill lerenoe I Beginning 3.1...ea :.::...:._,. 143,157,525 • i --..---.---- ........... I@tln@B: Shut of Joint Sark,Tnt. flat 6/esenes 11,901.000 17,I51,n1 n,651,616 18.761 0lutlea trunk Met war I leserees 16,233,00D 011,1S3 15,311,547 5.661 Bad letlresat ad Intent Intake IS,161,00 1.9011111 13,155,@ 11.511 Mae of MIT Bale Operatio9 Upeaa 11,931,000 1.In,n1 3,751,@ 61.41% Provided for lellhmnat fornicate / 1 0 CAR District operrtge0 I other Intaditara 1161S,ON 1,I52,211 ni,@ 61.611 _......... hill lntevdlgeree 139,911,M 30.311,993 Itl,3N,tli 21.67% .-MU... ending Ind Adnnk I13,111,533 ............................................._....... __._....._.........._........__..................__—__.... ___... Wow tliotoage Trusfub Wow inldo 1 Amw liked Maw 3131n1 "MUCO TO ....................... 1-30 U life lellel BOOST 1,297 1.397 Wi tees]IsLLcala no Alen flow 5,012 51001 i-S-E Otes9e/oliv!!]hunts Mdif I Be STOP 61E In 11119 Flefloar PIS grave 1.367 1 10,3671 0 i-E!orn0esuad Dlvetegen $4.91 03,230 WAS? 1-11 Well, seat loend-level n,@ 32,547 0,511 MCI ful0a PIS hlnetry 5,60 0 15,6731 0 Plitt to. 3 -Ptlllaway Btodia ad 0 Peudlllti few I1,556 (11,1561 0 E-11.31. Beach Filling Bill,Belief EMT ad ns I1n,1601 1@,@I 56 league PwphE ciplcltP at Stiffener 0 Diversion Reagan 0 left Uteaeptor Flat Flu @t to Olivetti 2-6-2 6 141 0 2-26-1. 2-E6.1, 1-16-1 build IDtercator level 11,111.135 311.541 111,119,5341 313.115 Put Richfield htat pur 1-22 0.616 0 I2316"] 0 1.11$0. 3ade11 Belief Ma 131,tl1 52T.M 1050.1NI 0 We,09 IF Closed 5.0. 00111-0 A 00171.0 17 1171 0 ....._..�. _� ............ Uh-Fitt] IS,fLL,@ !n,@ II6,NI,IIS) 6E11060 shut of Joint Sorge $3.321,116 I7.2n,1n 11,161.@I 62,613,90 Sd-Total 53,311,111 11,@,lit n,IN,@I 6t,113,ln =MID Ptlptln, PM I ND1P: �•_••••• _••--A•^ --- _—_T ............................... Bel ad Property leqhge SI/,01 $11.694 Collatio Liars rid f0ep Stan tl,lfl,@ 16.111.115 1E11066761 Trelteat facilities 0 1 Olepoll Tallith 33,173 33.112 Ooertl Flat Old MOST Fail 69.113 61190 equity In Joint lgaeat gtll - $5,111,531 1317,337) I,@,@ 102,161,n1 Other Motu at Fist it,,Mart III,N7 151,131) 11,3tl hall Property Flat B equip n11107,1n 17,@,I0 �1 i11.911,110 CdITl f AnO DISTRICT N. I 641m1!Nmml y® u Au 9 1 ow]Illnl • 6Nm imp 1, 111041 lemdmhl ixr ishte mlel Bea hu milt IlgeoNl Regional had Slleeru, Jody 1 —•__ UMBRIA t SAW Len (Bond Ioodle) oalfl 0 I11919 11111191 1.101, 1n A]1nA{looayvysmtlsA (Share of I91 ILISLNO 1,01511311 4.1111.767 61.11% Federal And State Construction Creou 311,100 111115 tR,165 6.431 Connection Fee. 2,IN.000 1,108,711 u1,N1 56.511 Oder 1., 16,13,1.000 MISS= 3101.617 66.161 Bile o9 Capacity Riots 1,11/,000 151.152 I,llW,m 1.57% Interest 6 Rise. Receipts I,Iu100 1,141I,114 2,221,0/6 N.BII other I'm 0 I,m 1.011 Seta lesson 39,511.010 23.11911" 16,IN,No 9.191 motel amoae S BniRalag I11"0, •sass--... 149,6i9,967 Rana.:.. ... ....... ............. Shan of Joint loth Sent. Plat A llnnn f7.I61.N1 11.116,911 79104I.00 19.71% District ttml lent Con.lr 6leaenn II, MAN (125,1101 11.63711114 -0.661 Band lotduett And Mlered Beattie 16,114111 2.101,111 I/,145,02 Ii.at Share of Jold ports Opeentlag allows 15,m.ou f,329,lu S,7N,113 91.101 Prorlded for leibenust Agreeienn 1 0 0 0.001 District petering A Oder aurdlural /,m,NO 1,151.311 1,609.09 65.511 total lueadide" 152,181.911 11,I11,1114 119,507,IR —••-91.111 hdIO Word kluu, -a= 116,419.751 ...................................................__..................................................................._................ RC6Rm mma ...................................................__....._.._-.._..._........--............................................................... lamee Nlen rest, t...far to alma 11In4 6Addltlaa fixed Assets 3131111 .......... ........... ....._. .... .......... ml=MIOI a PIMSS: ......................... Beneath Rotor octal Clr Bell 1,695 1,195 lutdde Its Rotor 45.611 1.135 (46,9161 0 3-0-11 Contractor 112,1191 a 11,129 0 11-17 fitter P/i Opgeede, -1 A 11 19,165 11,921 53,966 1-111-1 killer-Bolder Tagil Rehab 6,116 (R1,071 111,637 0 7d14 Wp.s]nteaeptor Ines 51,910 it.IN 69,611 Orage,lestes Wtral South 1-15 11,016 Ulm 19,699 lestolde P/A opirlde N IN) 0 Non CBS to Closed Dialect 11Q9 gable m11 IINI W 0 1-21-11 We Alullol Bled, Phu.In 11 IRI 0 We IS,to Closed?select 1 111 0 Bay-total IN.tl1 I1R.IN1 —IN,1N ---•175.103 Slue of Joint Snake 511,1111,413 IIJ16,146 11117616311 66,I01131 Sd-Saul $0,140,OR u.d16.N1 II.IN,mI 61,IN,111 aaMPIORM, PUP 6 NnP: _......_.. .._._.._ ��_. ._.___. .................................. Lord ad Property lights JI0,1J1 2N,231 Colleetla tins And long$lee 60,130,621 1160,3501 61,190,2" Treatment 9Aellltlel 91977 11911 Disposed 1a111R.s 11,111 Adju Werel Plant ad Basic fall 151,715 161.135 Ncitt In Joyce freluett hcil 101,511,139 (]16,DI51 1,1761139 III,647,910 Other fAleh it Belt bell Mort. 14,014 127,7701 rota Prpuly Plot A Ialp 217,111,136 11,311,975 -•-- 8 211,I29,911 Y COM SABITAII01 DISTRICT 10. 5 Seeking eoITIRIT olUCIAL MUST 9 BOmm men 3/111% ...........»....................................................................................................... B lmim ...._............._......................._._......._......_.._.__....._......_._............................................ 1910-11 lemming Tau-To-Bete °oon,", Indent leer- ate Budget I Defended .._.�... ._._...... ....... ............ Beginning fond suntan.Jeff 1 33,3161310 .......... Home: In Len(Band food),) only) 0 1,01 (1.0111 0.00% To Allocetlmellotrmttas Ignore of Ill 2,546,0O 1,673,116 02,921 63.71% federal Bad State Intellection Want, 41,000 3,003 44907 6.111 Conned!"fees 312,00 420,211 (87.2711 125.521 Otter fen 1,594,000 1,081,719 9111655 67.811 Sale of Capacity Eight, $10,010 23,33E 416,661 4.511 Interest P sine. Unlike 1,414,0th SIO,N6 903,154 39.11E Otter 2,015,000 A 2.00,00 BAB ........... ._._...... _......... ............ Rotfl fueled 1,60,000 7,191,061 f,116,l76 11.05E Total touch I fogldtng Returns 37,10.76E IoiNINms: _•^••^•Y store of Joint work,lml. Platt I Beason, 19,516,no 2,011,282 16,657,716 11.791 District Unit$net Constr a Reserve 2.714,000 2.317.By 402,113 85.59E Bad letlrunt and Interest Imene 3,026,351 100,999 2,917,359 3.601 Stan of Joint fork, Operating Britain 2,376,010 11134.200 941,1" 60.361 Prooded for lenhansmat Ignescent, 0 0 0 C.001 District Operating 6 Other loudltures 666,000 311,330 30f,170 55.591 ............ ....__. ............ ............ Total lmeadltares 20,126.338 7,102,638 21,223,720 25.21E ._.....__ ............ ..........:: tiding fond Balance, 29,905,729 .................................................................................................................. . WIL"HS WWI" ....................... ....... ........�................................................................................_......�. `mil Bala" Idlestmnm Em,fer 9e Bllmce i/1190 I Aultlml find basis 3131/91 MMNRim it?I=$$: ........................ We 0o to Clued Project 59 1T 5-40 Car Oil her PIS 1,0E 1,01E lltt It III Bob,I g.1.0.Upgrade IRISH 12,951 Corr Rocky it pretty 63 2 65 Rehab Inn Tyne -A- It. PIS IRS Study Balboa?talk A 53 31 II 5-30 Regain at Proposed Creole,of W Is. 0 of sib Street 5 6 6 - I,450 $1116 6.m1 5-39 plot, 566 alphas 6 the Sm Sithon/Pit 2 4,717 MISS 21,071 Bitter It P/B Telmetn Liles Reltetn US 621 0 624 5.37-2 inspection of PO Pill 401 Sam,5 6 6 991111 4,512 104.123 inooNlne Odor I Cnuallon stuff 5 16 21,/10 1,275 24,363 5.29 rout lace Raja bpiaccout 14 6 36,410 36.00 Replace Lido force Ilia 5-26 12,319E (2,3191 Cant Tmek Pen, 1 2,033 2,033 5-27 Balboa Trask Serer Lido PIS A V It PIS 165 0 161 5-32 Bitter PC A Rocky Pt PIS Pis for 5 16 22,0E 61751 29,119 5-31 Sa01de Or Block Baker inpr Pound 1,2 6 3 ],im,l0 1,153,376 21mi,371 5-33 Bay Bridge PIS pipe 66,0E 51.179 113,971 5-35 10. Cent Ttmk Beeer-loel Pbues 112 122,450 1,03,07 1,197,497 5.36 Costal Cole PIS 45,561 7.907 53,I75 ............ «....... ........... Bub-fonl 2,011,551 1,311,117 0 4,497,111 ............ ._•___.. _—._._. ............ thus of Joint Barks 1,930,30 21101117 (11299,713) 10,529,879 Bab-Tatei 619301309 2,10,lIi (11290,7131 10,529,171 ........... ..........» .......... ............ =BUD PRolln, PM I IOU": ................................. �," ,� Land and Property lights 6,231 6,231 saBm." Collulloa Line,and Imp its, 19,723,231 19,723,234 Tmfinmt pullitlal 1,347 I,Le1 Disposal Utilities 1,115 7.115 General Plat ud Send boll 24,851 34,051 Unity it Joint yrousenl 1ec11 13,714,670 (53,149) 1,290,713 14,111,231 .other Asset, It rot San Berl. 0 0 0 _.......... ............ ............ ........ Total Property Plant I pain 41,93,346 5,221,960 0 19,761,301 WARS 6a1tI11D1 lima? 04E91r family Imuclu Badly 1 finds mm 1/31M ........................................................................................................................................................ 1C061t helm ............................................................................................................................................._......... 1190.51 uulsol fae-7641t, Road leer-71-114te adml 1 Shadow .......... ............ ......... ............ halides had W.".. Jet, 1 16,706,715 ............ llvmRe: 7a Way Ilsed ta611) hall) D 0 0 0.001 In llladlen/lanetlns [she'.o6 Id 1,111,000 171.163 511,m 61.71% Federal sad state faatnc,d Green 53,000 3.434 II,S16 6.11% Countat lee, 229.000 111,E37 111,767 50AR near leer 1,75/,000 1,115'al f1J.111 65.01% 1.11 of Capacity liplts $67,000 n.117 $41,0/3 1.57% literati I else. haipte I,Oa,m In.R! $10,118 11.I41 0t0es 1 0 0 0.a1 total lend, f,RE,00/ 3.31E,a0 i,i11,SIC 51.31% tetel Moore I halmlt0 Islas... vov�tia„ •20,011,E05 ••�••••••,�� film Main:Shia.1.6 Jhlet fail,Mr. Plat I Mine, 11,596,Om 3,m,117 11,386,513 hest District had fair CmAr I lateral 3,1011000 E7,211 31371,729 0.101 load left...at ad Initial$mate 11150,000 fi.m 2,111,311 MCI There of Joint lark,Cpeattill Biased, 2,170,000 I.m,m 1,0a.25D 61,411 provided for lelaakeesat Instant; 0 1 0 MOP detain tacel5ap I sear mpadiam 151,Om 70,710 111,210 19.991 ............ ............ ............ ............ Total take editor,. 23,277,0D S,011.11E 11,21,110 11.551 Wag had Ballad, ._..ran.,.. .... ..... 1,315 ...................................................................._...._..............................Y....._.............................. 114111Mm mmI01 ........................................................._.............................................._ __..__............_......_....._.. aside, Alluded, messes d laluu 7/1190 1 Addition Md uuu WIM .......... ........... �Y... ..._.... WImm110a II PIMIS: ......................... Ithr rep to eland pal"t S1 n S-31$false at Proposed needs,of W te. of 1d Street 5 6 6 2661 11,716 15.114 S-39 Old, $66 11p0d I the IF llphn/Ilt 1 151 910 1.111 Bitter at PIS telaetR nest leluatln 5 6 6 2I1 0 E19 WI-2 InRtt,e felt pin 101 ,eat 5 6 6 11,97D 1,136 26,116 TruilLee Did I females Rely 5 6 6 11,015 I,276 20.361 6-I2 taint"Iellef 51,Si7 D S1,m 5-11 coast 1.11,Led effluent f 11 11920 I'm 5{I Bitter it 11.11 It F/I fur S 1 6 7,610 2,169 11.549 I4-1-1 1 6 I dslor lot., d-19 War Star"t / face Ida. Districts 6, 1 6 If 170,161 5,141 m,ni 1st-foal 294.347 Ef,m 1 520,611 Share of Joist ens, 9.116,361 3,E11.117 (I.m.m3 11.6111.111 fah-fatal �I,11f,m 3,m.117 111161,6611 11,611.117 COMMI)PWPIM, PM I SIDS!: -^•-••_- _�� —•_•W ^�— .................................. Sad all Intent 1100 162 m dulctim Slake ad rip au 1,717.611 I,m,11I ttadnt Facilities I'm E,m _ \ :top esl7 Facilities item Item Grand Not ad Basin hall 11.76E II,m fealty It islet trill at tall 15.262.565 159,01f1 I,m,m I6,161,113 Oder Leas, at lot this wort. 9,701 11,9111 I.Im total hand?Piet I lalp n,317,633 3,In71 y 1 31.537,361 eannsaa saun,aln .area"". d"""m. toof7l I iol giTQA M. 7 SUMT DMMU 711Mn111/i1 • 9 My)$My)3/31191 Mill .............._........_........._................._......._........._......._................................................... psi ......-_........................._.............................................................................................. y 19Pa-l1 lmbbl leuM egte Idiot Telr+ta-Olte ks/pt 1IgiW lalnning rood Balances, Ja1T 1 53.617,162 MIME: __...._.. •••fie Eery (Bald acdls) only) 0 0 0 0.001 ?u MlloatlessIblavenllons looses of III 1,571,00D 2,646.055 1.677,91S 61.191 federal and Stare Conservation Blab 15,00 4,164 70,156 Mit Coanectite In, 1,121,000 611.621 1,177,110 15.161 Other lees 610,1a 710,216 Ip,1161 314.56% me of Capacity light, 101.M 36,711 7651719 4.591 Interest 6111c. Ralph, 2,677.000 1,901,530 111,/70 91.781 Other 0 0 1 1.0/1 ........... ........... ......._... ........... Total Mena 9.722,0" $1013,226 3,701,771 61.151 w.••• fetal Mace I Bepinle0 Baltic's n nw m 59.656.111 n.u..n ......w•.•. ........... IIPIIOIMII: (here of,Joint forks lat. Plat 6 Aeaerne 27,611,000 1,116.177 71.Oa0.117 HIM District Task Beret asset 6 lees... 14,111,001 Ip,159 13,112.01 5.511 Bud letlruut Aid Interest hostile 1,91S.110 101,111 3,078,011 1.711 Shire of Jnlat mire Operation Sealants 1,61D.M 1,211,121 1,136.171 60.91% Padded for lelaarlenet Apreneatr 0 0 0 0.001 District Opernleg I Other Irpadlraret Id!l,001 I29,680 695,170 51.411 ........... _.......... ......... ............ vital Irpldltoree 51,198,140 8,571,119 12,964,601 16.571 Radial Ind Illinois ••wnn•.w 31.117,131 •weec....w .-_.--..-... ................................._........_.........................._.........._.............._.......»................................ WIRITll mmHg .................................._........_.........-......................._ ....._........_._.._._._...._._...................... ,t•Sr $time ilosteuks ballu To lattice 711190 i Hurt"$ fins/Aaceks 7/71191 .......... ..._..... ......... aNITIpTii if"Mile: ......................... 7.16 lesson lelghts Ines 151 In 7-I5 Clifford Cable 11,011 12,011 7-11-7 I11-bpcl echtroal Sellef fever I.il 1101/ Agrat 1/mete Neva to felnln looting Met I6,113 MISS Su Nice I luertot adu Boob 0 1,671 INS 7-11 Ancient 9 FIT O 50.696 50,614 Jaestlan Age Ilpuacut 0 MST 1,151 7.6.1.1 liflosor Sat 121 11,611 15,119 7.17 cap,Idiot Inset KOH 176,492 155,151 Dist 7➢ "red properties Stall I4,I71 0 71,111 7.1 laterite BOOlral SII sit 7-11-1,1,1 Aoadomat lid With of?IS 1,311,672 If1,611 1,503,266 City of Drugs InsteliNnsa ID,477 10.6n Mistake Adj. to Drugs ay. Anne. 101,627 0 101.127 lab Street Pit 1-1-1 165 10,611 10.917 11.1.1 A A I Bitter Ile., 11.1-I llksT Ilrit 0 Ines Note DletriM 6. 11 It 1,579,168 I/I,95 1,171,311 Baser Design for list Baltic$Pacific IOU 17.799 17,701 teconsbact siphon a A.D. p $1117 1.111 6 .._._..... ............ ....... ..__..... soh-rota 1.in,111 106,919 0 31961,410 Share at Joint Sorb 14,016,615 I'lu,In 11,075.1011 16,117,103 la-latal 11.016,632 /,541,171 11,075,7121 1115171163 MIMD PMIM, pap I SgM: _......._. _.«..»... .«_._.._ ....»...... .................................. Sid ad Property ligtti 176,/9 776,at Collection Uu,led Pup$roe 24,i6,616 11,116,616 `Ue" Tretbat facilities 0 0 Dbpal facilities 10,711 10,717 Morel Plat ad lab full 17,917 17.1" Salty 10 solve?resister Iail 11,6t9.510 (11,591) 1,07S,701 23.611,191 Other ilab at art tell hart. 0 0 0 ._._._. Total Property Plead I IgolP 61,ln,501 5,711,Si1 0 0.111,116 ems th11TAT1O1 DISTRICT AD. 11 BPAAAI/ QUITIRLI ?nA M nPORT 9 IOmS mID 3/31/11 ........................................................................................................................................................ BODGCT Rmn ......... 1910-91 Wtlning tear-70-Date Budget leer-To-Date Budget 1 Intended .......... ............ ...».... ............ Begisnlnt/nod Balances, July i 36,109,D15 ............ Imme: Its Len food landpl only) 14,000 0,957 5,0/3 61.98t US Allocation/hheaallnes Mile of 112 2,467,000 11372,585 091,415 65.111 Federal red State Construction Greats 66,000 1,252 61,111 6.111 onmeatloa has 1,710,000 109,114 1.600,m 6.10% Other lean 2,963,000 I1I91796 I,m,202 62.131 Sale of Capacity lights 1.352,000 32,0/1 1,319,907 2.371 Internet 6IIan. Receipts 21021,000 617,905 1,376.095 31.01% Other 1.312,005 0 1,392,000 SAM ............ ............ ........«.. ............ Total lessen, 11,161,000 l,IS1,001 7,133,996 34.91% ....mn Total Rescue 1 Defining 311oces ••••_--�{-_- 40,313.019 ... ...:.._.__.. ............ mmnml: Shoe of Jalet forks Tret. Plot 1 Reserve, II,370,000 3,971,138 11,395,062 17.771 District Troei Seer finite 1 Separate 6,111,000 171,150 6,104,242 i.oi land letlr sent aid Interest Irpeoas 3,766,350 99,795 3,666,555 2.651 there of Joist lorks Operating lip Dill 2,975,000 1,S59,230 1,115,170 62.501 Provided for lelahareeaet Agreeteati 0 0 0 D.Dot District Operating I Other Iepeedltatee 715,000 239,221 515,778 30.111 .........--. ............ ............ ............ Total tapeeditares 36,779,350 1,351,143 ID,128,ID0 17.211 Indian Teed Balances 33,99i'm �av� ........................................................................................................................................................ IACImIIS II111SIO1 ........................................................................................................................................................ Balance Rd7apt0neks Trmfer To palace 7/1190 1 l etle$ /lard WAS 3131191 .......... __...... ._..- .......... COImoR101 n nomad: ......................... 11-11 Slater ?to Beene BP tapomette 13,511 171,151 222,213 500 IF liergmy Werator it Slater PIT 11,670 D 91,670 Clo legalre hats For Coast Trash 0 I Bob&thief 3,575 3,575 lab-Total 111,760 I71,751 0 317,311 Share of Joist lone 12,279,175 «3,971,131 11,771,4231 11,111.1" Iand01:11 12,271.175 3,971,131 11,711,4231 O,p1,01 elOmn PROnm, PWT I loon: r-«---« --- «-- .................................. Lod Ind Property Riots 146,116 116,916 Collection Liles fed Pup Saba 19,2/1,126 19,211,426 Treament necilltiel 0 0 D11p0111 Fapllitles 3,053 3,053 General Plot Ind Win Yell 11.161 ie,161 equity In Joint Treatment?fell 11,191,121 17310711 1,771,423 20.597,166 Other"sets It Cast less Mort. 1,610 11,1551 2,921 Total Property Plat 6 equip 9.717m 1,1//,m 0 ...n....... ...m..nn ......___.:: __...:...._ �s� .......... .... ..... county SANITATION DISTRICT 10. 13 SMIT guATRai rumour L MM 9 AOaIS Ing0 3/31/01 .............._..............................................................._......._.........._................._..._......_........... V6 leaf Paris _.-_•............................................................................................................................................ 1990.91 Remaining Yearfo-Date Budget lea-To-rate ldat I ceded .......... ......._... ........ ............ beginning Intl alone", July 1 9,1531I1S ........... RUM$: fa Nag land Indlel all) 0 0 0 0.00 Tex allocatioulublatisn length of III 0 0 0 0.00% Federal ad state coatactin Create 3,000 He 2,032 5.601 emactiom Fees 21200,00D 101,750 2.171,256 Idiot Other Pan 401,000 319.601 115,315 10.041 Sale 0f capacity Riots 25,000 1,265 26.735 1.521 Interat I Slow. Receipts 156,000 649,235 106,765 05.511 Other 0 0 0 O.ai ............ . ............ ......._... ............ Total Issues 3,552,000 1,092,099 2,439,901 10.751 =_:«««...-- ..... Total Revenue 6 beginiag balances 10,945,171 SIPIbOR011S: Stare Of Joint forte Prat. Plant I Stearns 1./al.000 156,557 71264,443 2.111 District Truk Sewer Caatr I Reserves 1,993,08 1 4,953,000 0.01 bad Retirement ad Interest Signals 0 31125 (3,325) 0.001 Short of Joint fora Operating upenn 307,00 169,515 117,415 61.731 Provided for belsbornmat Agceeweote 0 0 0 0.001 District Operating 6 Other liandltaes 230,00 16,317 213.613 1.091 _ _ Total 11pemdlnree 12,151,000 365,711 12.515.286 2.12% «=ssvv«._ -- boding tied aloncee -__«------- II,S79,160 ----- ----- ........................................................................_.............?_......................................._......_.......... F016IT11s NWION ....................................................._....._....................._........................................_......_............ Salomon ldjunua Trailer TO Selene 7/1190 I Idditien Plead Assets 3/31191 .......... ........_. ..._.._... .......... a96TROCT10R II PICHISs: ........................ Share of Joint forte 113,725 156,151 1/1,7111 561,571 sub-fatal -..-103,725 156,5S7 .--.170,7111 561,572 ....._..... ............ ..._....... .._........ COSP31TID PROAITi, PLAIT 6 IQW: .............................. Lead sea Property lights 0 0 collection Lines ad Pup Site 0 0 Treatment Facilities 0 0 Disposal /acilitles 0 0 General Plat ad 0vin Pail 0 0 laity In Joint Treatat lath 744,I17 12,0191 71,711 820,319 Other Raters at net Lae Sort $2,071 120.3741 31,700 ......_.... ._..-._... ....._..... ........... Total Property Plat A Sgmlp 1,200,290 133130 0 1,413.5" ,%me am mITHIOe DISTRICT No. It MORAIT ODAITIaT rIrAACIAL IRPA@ ..............................................9 ...- into ......1 ` I Rae► BODDIT tulle .........................................................'--'..................................-.................................................... 1990.91 Remaining Ivor."ate Budget 1ee1-To-0ate Budget 1 ImpeeMd .......... ............ ......... ............ listening Paid Beleacee, Sul? 1 20.536,309 ............ IIVINIS: Ter Levy (Bond India) amlyl 0 0 0 0.011 M Allaeetlnas/Sabieetloie ($Rare of lop 0 0 0 I'D$% federal mad State OOnatroctlo0 Great$ 56,00o 315" 52,111 6.111 1190 fees IO,147,000 3,015,861 1,111,139 21.251 Other fees 0 3,713 (31793) 0.011 Sale of Capacity lights 592,000 27,081 56016 /.51% Interest L Vise. Receipts 1901060 111,31E 15,s2l 75.91% Other $55,000 0 355,000 0.001 ........... ............ ............ ............ Total Revenue 12,210,010 3.254,119 9,023,301 21.50% ou.......... ............ an..ana. nunu.n. Total leseaue 1 Beginning Sellers lJ,I!],EII ............ IIPIIDITOIIB: Skate of Joint Rorke Test. Pleat S Reserves 5,761,000 3,351,931 2,407,061 $0.221 District Stock Barer coostr 6 leeer,es 1,722,000 911.630 6,733,370 12.10% Bud Retirement no Interest lassoes 0 11,561 11115111 0.001 there of Joint Works Operating lassoes 711,000 712,171 (64,1711 101.911 Provided for leidareeeeat Agreements 1 0 0 0.001 District Operating L Other Ispsdltures 301,op0 ",too . 111,116 21.111 Total lipeidituree H,fOf,000 ••SIM Sao 9,215,12o _ 36.07% ,sn..a.... .....a...... ..a......... Indlop food Selectee ...... ... ..................................................................................................................................................... 1217=I mm101 .................................................................................................._................................................ Neste Adlostmste hramla To Mime 711190 a Additions filed AM is 3131111 .......... ........... ......«.... .......... COWJT,O@I01 Im Imo": ......................... Kate It lint Ladles 6 catwalk lomtall 11030 11030 Ilse CBS to Closed Project 3 5 114.1 A 6 1 Dialer let., I4-1-2 Baker Street 0 Porte Kato, Districts 6, 7 11t I,6I7,501 919.161 5,571162 Isle it. Pump Station rep"Malts 7.7-1 1,411 S,IA 27,927 ............ ............ ........... ........... Jab-70tal 4,614,914 911,630 0 5,603,624 ............ ..«........ ............ ........... Mote of Joint Inks 10,162,100 3,JS3,131 (1,103,39) 12,113,15E ............ ............ ............ ............ sub.-Total 10,16E,110 1,1f7,931 I1,f03,1f11 12,213,1f1 ............ ............ ......_.... ............ Comemmo PIO1117T, pun 6 gonp: ................................ Land ad Property lights 0 0 Collection Line and Pump$tie 7,01,201 7,103,201 Tteakmst facilities 0 0 Disposal raellltlea 1 0 amoral Plat and we Pall 6,747 6,111 Staidly In Joint treeMat ?Bell I6,023,121 161.6731 1,503.351 17,465,513 Other Assets at Coot tees Mart. 36,173 122.0111 34,375 - ............ ............ ............ ............ Total Property Plat L Rgulp 11,661,110 /,lfl,if0 Ii,126,f20 \. .....we...., . .......... ............O ...........' `V' RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA May 22, 1991 101M ELLIS AVENUE A .Box 6127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728.0127 M41662.2411 REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE/FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEES Meeting Date: May ZZ, 1991 - 5:30 p.m. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE: Present: Present: Buck Catlin Joint Chairman William Mahoney, Chairman William Mahoney Vice Joint Chairman James Evans Don R. Griffin Past Joint Chairman Don Griffin Norman E. Culver Past Joint Chairman Evelyn Hart Dan Griset Chairman, District 1 Charles E. Puckett Iry Pickler Chairman, District 2 James Wanner Evelyn Hart Chairman, District 5 Grace Winchell James A. Wahner Chairman, District 6 Richard B. Edgar Chairman, District 7/Past JC Absent: Grace Winchell Chairman, District 11 William D. Ehrle Chairman, District 13 John Gullixson Roger Stanton County Supervisor Peer Swan Absent: STAFF PRESENT: Sal A. Sapien Chairman, District 3 J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager .� Peer Swan Chairman, District 14 Blake Anderson, Dir. Technical Svcs. Don Roth County Supervisor Tan Dawes, Director of Engineering Gary Streed, Director of Finance OTHERS PRESENT: Ed Hodges, Sr. Facilities Manager, Maintenance Director Phil Sansone Steve Hovey, Information Services Director Mark Schwing Manager Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Louis Sangermano, Laboratory Manager 1) Fiscal Policy Committee Recommendations. The Fiscal Policy Committee met on May 15th and considered several items of business. Enclosed is a copy of the Committee's report and recommendations, summarized as follows: A. 1991-92 Joint Works Budgets. Fiscal Policy Chairman Mahoney reported that the Committee had met several times over the past few months to consider the 1991-92 Joint Works Budgets. He reviewed the enclosed booklet containing the following budgetary recommendations: (1) Personnel Recommendations (blue): Twenty-seven new positions are recommended to provide staffing to operate and maintain the facilities �..i required by major treatment plant expansions and to support related activities and new program implementation to comply with changing regulatory requirements. (1 of 7) Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees' Report May 22, 1991 During a discussion of staffing requirements it was pointed out that this year our various departments requested 60 new positions. The General Manager and the Fiscal Policy Committee have reviewed those requests with the Department Heads and are recommending only 27 new positions for 1991-92. Many of these positions will not be filled until later in the year, and some may not be filled at all in 1991-92 if completion of construction projects is delayed. Seven of the 27 positions are to replace consultants or part-time positions being deleted. Summary of Proposed Additional Staffing Program/System Positions Professional Technical Skilled Clerical Management Board Secretary & Support 1 1 Management Support 1 1 Finance Purchasing/Warehouse 1 1 \� Information Services 3 3 Operations & Maintenance General Plant and Equipment Maintenance 7 4 3 Technical Services Regulatory Compliance (Air, Land Water) 4 2 1 1 Source Control Program 3 1 3 (1> Process Monitoring and Laboratory 7 7 TOTAL 27 4 18 3 2 The proposed new positions would raise the authorized staffing level from 643 to 670 at an added maximum annual salary cost of $1,155,928. , an increase of approximately 5.2%. Employee benefits add approximately 27% to the cost. (2 of 7) Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees' Report May 22, 1991 (2) Joint Operating Fund (green): The net cost of administering the Joint Distric s activities and operating and maintaining the Joint Treatment Works for 1991-92 is estimated at $53.1 million. Revenues and other offsets in the amount of $3.1 million will reduce the net Joint Operations requirements to $50 million, up 5.1% from the 1990-91 budget. Of this, 1.8% (a little more than one-third) of the Increase is due to inflation and plant expansion, and 2.6% (a little less than two-thirds) is the result of regulatory mandates. (3) Self-Funded Insurances: Included in the Joint Operating Budget, the following self-funded insurance budgets are consistent with the Boards' past actions relative to these plans: 1. Workers' Compensation (pink) $ 257,000 2. Self-Funded Health Plan (goldenrod) 2,177,000 3. Liability (salmon) 336,000 (4) CORF Joint Works Construction (yellow): The CORF budget sets forth a $114.1 million treatment plant expansion and improvement construction program for 1991-92 in accordance with the 30-year Master Plan adopted by the Boards in 1989. The Committees recommend approval of the proposed 1991-92 personnel '—� requirements and Joint Works Operating and Construction Budgets. B. Computer Automation Master Plan. Past Joint Chairman Griffin, acting Fiscal Policy Committee Chairman at the May 15th meeting, reported that staff has prepared a Minicomputer Hardware System and Network Master Plan designed to serve as the Districts' computer automation planning document for the next three to five years, and briefly reviewed the plan. (During the Fiscal Policy Committee's review staff was asked to prepare additional information which is attached to the enclosed computer master plan.) Following a review and discussion of the computer master plan the Committees recommend the following actions: 1. Approve in principle the Minicomputer Hardware System and Network Master Plan. Specific hardware/software determinations will be made by the Boards as each phase of the plan is considered for Implementation. 2. Authorize purchase from Digital Equipment Corporation of a VAX 4000, Model 300 dual host cluster computer system with fiber optic Ethernet Network, in an amount not to exceed $567,000 plus tax for the first phase of the Minicomputer Hardware System and Network �..i Master Plan implementation. (3 of 7) Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees' Report May 22, 1991 C. Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS). The Committee recommends authorization to purchase Laboratory Information Management System software from VG Fisons in an amount not to exceed $249,600 plus tax to manage the large volumes of data handled by the laboratory and help comply with applicable regulatory requirements. 2) Authorizin Fiscal Polic Committee to Place Districts' 1991-92 Workers ompensat on Excess Insurance overage. Staff reported that the current workers' compensation excess coverage insurance policy expires on July 1, 1991. The Districts' present policy for statutory workers' compensation coverage (unlimited benefits) with an annual self-insured retention level of $250,000 carries an annual premium of $36,257. Because of the way the insurance marketplace works, we may not have quotations for the 1991-92 coverage in time for consideration by the Boards at the regular June meeting. Inasmuch as the current coverage will expire between the Boards' June 12th and July loth regular meetings, staff is recommending that the Fiscal Policy Committee be authorized and directed to evaluate proposals obtained by the Districts' insurance broker and place appropriate excess workers' compensation coverage effective July 1, 1991; and that the actions taken by the Fiscal Policy Committee be submitted to the Joint Boards for ratification or revision at the regular meeting on July loth. This is similar to the procedure followed by the Boards in past years. (If our broker is able to obtain quotations in time for the regular June Board meeting, the matter will be submitted directly to the Joint Boards for consideration on June 12th.) Recommendation: The Committees concur with the staff's recommendation to authorize the ill Policy Committee to place the workers' compensation excess coverage insurance effective July 1, 1991, subject to ratification by the Boards. 3) Interagency Agreement with SAWPA re Pretreatment Program. In 1972 an agreement was executed between the Districts and the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) wherein SAWPA acquired a 30 mgd capacity right in the Districts' sewerage system. The intent of the agreement is to help protect the underground fresh water supplies of both the upper Santa Ana River basin (Riverside and San Bernardino County) and the lower basin (Orange County) by allowing diversion of up to 30 mgd of non-reclaimable industrial and brine wastewater from the SAWPA area to the Districts for treatment and ocean disposal. SAWPA has acquired the full 30 mgd capacity in the Santa Ana River Interceptor system to deliver the wastewater to the Districts' joint treatment works and, to date, has purchased 8 mgd capacity in the Joint Treatment Works and Disposal System. (4 of 7) Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees' Report May 22, 1991 Because the Districts are the holder of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit which sets forth the conditions of treated wastewater disposal through the Districts' ocean outfall , including the SAWPA flows processed through our plants, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires that there be a separate interagency agreement pertaining to the administration of EPA's pretreatment requirements for applicable dischargers within the SAWPA jurisdiction and area. The Districts and SAWPA have been working on such an agreement for over a year. Basically, the agreement requires that dischargers within the SAWPA territory comply with the same requirements established by ordinance of the Districts' Boards of Directors for dischargers in Orange County and gives the Districts the right to monitor SAWPA area dischargers and take enforcement action for non-compliance if SAWPA fails to do so. Enclosed is a copy of the agreement (gray) along with a memorandum from the General Counsel 's office pertaining to said agreement. Recommendation: The Committees recommend authorization for the Chairman of Dis roc Flo.1 to execute the interagency agreement with SAWPA on behalf of the Sanitation Districts. 4) Stringfellow Advisory Commission. The Stringfellow Advisory Committee was established by the California Department of Health Services in September, 1983, to provide community input and participation in the plan to clean up the Stringfellow Toxic Waste Site in Riverside County, to receive information, ask questions and provide input on the interim treatment plan and long-term cleanup plan for the site. Membership is comprised of representatives from the following agencies: Department of Health Services, Orange County League of Cities, Orange County Hazardous Waste Materials Program, Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, Parents of Jurupa, Riverside County Health Department, League of Women Voters, Environmental Protection Agency and Concerned Neighbors in Action. The treated wastewater from the Stringfellow site is ultimately discharged to the Sanitation Districts sewerage system pursuant to the 1972 agreement (see item 3 above). Joint Chairman Catlin observed that there has not been active League representation on the Commission for some time. Accordingly, he has discussed this with members of the League and inasmuch as the Orange County cities affected by the Stringfellow program are represented on the Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County; and since the treated Stringfellow wastewater is ultimately disposed of through the Sanitation Districts' system, he suggested that it might be appropriate for the Sanitation Districts to appoint a representative to the Commission in lieu of an appointment by the Orange County League of Cities. Following a brief discussion the Committees' members concurred with the Joint Chairman's recommendation that he submit the suggested change in representation on the Stringfellow Advisory Commission to the California Department of Health Services for consideration. (5 of 7) Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees' Report May 22, 1991 v 5) Status Re ort on SCAQMD Permit far Air Pollution Control S stems for tandby Generation Equipment, pecificati on No. E-109-1. At the May Joint Board meeting staff reported that the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) had ruled that the Districts' five 1300 KW emergency standby mobile (trailer-mounted) generator sets are "stationary sources° rather than mobile sources, and therefore subject to Regulation XIII, which requires 'best available control technology' (BACT). This ruling effectively means that emission control equipment, estimated to cost $1 million would be required on these units, otherwise SCAQMD would not permit them to operate more than 56 hours per year, which could effectively render them useless if they had to be pressed into emergency service in the event of a failure of other power sources. Board Members expressed considerable concern over this requirement and referred the matter back to staff and the Executive Committee to determine if and how it might be appropriate to get SCAQMD to reconsider their ruling. Staff reported that based on discussions with several Board Members, Yorba Linda Council Member Hank Wedaa, who is the Orange County League of Cities representative on the SCAQMD Board, has intervened and SCAQMD was reviewing the matter. Mr. Wedaa, a past Sanitation District Board Member/District Chairman has been extremely helpful to the Districts in the past by facilitating dialog between the Air District and not only our Districts, but all publicly-owned treatment works (POTWs) in the South Coast Air Basin, concerning the uniqueness of the services that POTWs provide in an attempt to bring more reason to SCAQMD regulations and rulings. POTWs provide non-discretionary public service in managing wastewater to protect public health and the environment, and, as such, need to be considered differently than other, discretionary, sources of air emissions. The Director of Engineering reported that the issues that we have discussed with SCAQMD in the past two weeks since the Board meeting have revolved around various combinations of reduced generator set exercise time (currently four hours per month per generator) and longer running times without emission control devices. He advised that today, however, in a discussion with the Assistant Director of the SCAQMD, SCAQMD said that it cannot allow the engines to run more than the 56 hours per year without emission control devices added. Their original position regarding the installation of these devices still stands. They believe they are bound under the Clean Air Act to proceed in this manner. They did, however, give several suggestions for consideration by staff and the Directors. First of all , they suggested purchasing only one catalytic converter and installing a manifold system whereby each engine could be exercised through the same catalytic converter, one after another. In the event of a power outage, one of the engines could be run through the converter and the other four could be run up to 56 hours in any one year. By the same token, we could purchase two converters providing a greater degree of reliability. One could be stationary for inplant exercise, the second mobile for movement between pump stations. These ideas, and any variation of them, would save initial capital cost, but all of them would produce less reliability than purchasing five catalytic converters in mobile units. (6 of 7) Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees' Report May 22, 1991 v Following a general discussion of these options and others, including the possibility of seeking legislative relief, the staff was directed to further study the alternatives and report back to the Executive Committee. 6) Update on Proposed Orange County Water Research Institute (to be Funded by Joan Irvine Smith). Last month it was reported that Joan Irvine Smith had approached several water agencies in Orange County with an offer to fund water related projects that would benefit Orange County's water resources. Mrs. Smith is particularly interested in funding innovative programs that will have an ongoing benefit, such as desalinization, water reclamation and toxic waste management. The Committee authorized and directed staff to work with the Irvine Ranch Water District to draft a joint proposal for consideration by Mrs. Smith. At a meeting held in Irvine on May 13th, Mrs. Smith proposed a joint exercise of powers agreement to create the Orange County Water Research Institute with the stated purpose of undertaking research, development and implementation of public water projects for the purpose of developing, conserving and efficiently using water resources in Orange County. At the meeting Mrs. Smith also expressed an interest in ocean issues. The draft proposal now includes the Irvine Ranch Water District, the Orange County Water District, the Municipal Water District of Orange County, the San Juan Basin Authority and the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County as the members of the joint powers agency. The proposal is still in the formulative stages and considerable work remains to be done before any such institute could come to fruition. Staff briefly reviewed the proposed institute, and the projects submitted by the Districts (summarized on enclosed (buff) page.) Staff reported that the next meeting is scheduled for June 4th and staff members will attend to represent the Districts' interests. JWS:sc Enclosures (7 of 7) May 15, 1991 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 1 0 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 108AA ELLIS AVENUE REPOTU OF THE FISCAL POLICY COMI'7 MEE Ro BOX 8127 / FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 22"B-8121 �/ Meetin4 Date: Mav 15, 1991 n1A1982.2An FISCAL POLICY COAm•IITl : OTHERS PRESENT: Present: .Thorax L. Woodruff, General Counsel Don Griffin, Acting Chairman STA2F PRPSENr: James V. Evans Evelyn Hart J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Charles E. Puckett Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance Peer Swan Tom M. Dawes, Director of Engineering James Wahner Ed E. Hodges, Assistant Director of Grace Winchell Maintenance Bob Ooten, Assistant Director of Absent: Operations Steve Hovey, Information Services William Mahoney, Chairman Manager John Gullixson Imis Sangeoano, Laboratory Manager Irwin Haydock, Compliance Manager 1. NINE I+MH 1990-91 BUDGET REVIEW. The Committee reviewed the enclosed summary statements of the Joint Works operating costs (JO); the Joint Works capital improvement program (=); and the costs of the workers, compensation, public liability and health plan self-insurance funds for the first nine months of fiscal year 1990-91. With three quarters of the year gone, 62.14% of the net joint operating budget has been expended. Net costs are up $3,031,965, or 11.42% cured with the same period last year. This cost increase i primarily due to additional staffing and related salary and benefit costs totaling $1,979,491; and increased professional and contractual services totaling $800,071 consisting primarily of sludge disposal, hazardous waste disposal, legal services and a new line item for the private operations and maintenance of the oxygen plant. Sale offsetting operational savings have been realized from decreases in chlorine and odor control chemical costs and reduced use of chemical coagulants. Increases in other categories make up the balance of net cost increases. Joint Works construction projects for the first nine months are running at 58% of the 1990-91 budget. The Additional Primary Clarifiers at Plant No. 1, P1-33; Gas Handling Facilities, P1-34-1; Sludge Handling Facilities, P1-34-2; and various J-19 Central Power Generation jobs account for $44.7 million of the $60.2 million outlay through three quarters of the budget year. 2. 1991-92 JOINT WORKS B=. Over the past several months, the Committee has reviewed the staff recommendations for various portions of the Joint Works Budgets. The personnel changes and corresponding organizational changes and charts were reviewed and approved March 20, 1991. Twenty-seven new positions were Report to the Fiscal Policy Ca mittee Page 2 May 15, 1991 y approved for new or expanding programs, treatment plant processes and equipment. These additions are included in the projections for 1991-92 in the enclosed 1991-92 Joint Works Budget Reco mendation of the Fiscal Policy Committee; and are discussed in detail in the blue section, followed by gold colored organizational charts. The green section of the booklet contains the total Joint Operating budget and line item discussion. The rec®mended budget total is $50.031 million, an increase of 5.1% over the current year budget. In 1979, the Fiscal Policy Committee recommended, and the Joint Boards approved, a self-insurance program for the Districts. The following self-insurennCe fund budgets (included in the above Joint Operating budget) are also contained in the recc mteeled budget book: a) Workers' Coopensation (pink) b) Self-Funded Health Plan (goldenrod) c) Public Liability (salmon) The recommended Joint Works Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (COAT) construction budget for 1991-92 is $114.120 million. The recommendation and the projections through 2020 are included in two reports: a) Joint Works CORF Budget (yellow) b) Classification of Budgeted Projects by Revenue �..✓ Program Category (blue) Recommended Action The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends approval of the 1991-92 Joint Works Budget Reccamendation for consideration by the Joint Boards of Directors on June 12, 1991. 3. MINICOMPUTER HARDWARE SYS'1'1 M AND NETWORK MASTER PLAN. Current computerization of the Districts consists of a number of personal or desktop computers, most of which are on local area networks (IAN); a dedicated word processing network; a financial/aocounting miniccu,ter; a dual-host process monitoring minicomputer system at Plant No. 2; and various security and co mnudmtion systems. Several projects have been approved by the Board to advance this crnguterization, including process controllers in merry of the new facilities. The Districts' Information Services Division has reviewed the current situation and our plans and requirements for the future and has prepared an analysis and Minicomputer Bardordre System and Network Master Plan staff report (tan) which was reviewed at length by the Committee. This report will serve as a planning document for the next three to five years. It includes background information on the cuter industry and trends in general, as well as the standards in place at the District. l ; Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 3 May 15, 1991 Recommended Action ad The Committee recommends implementation of the first phase of the Minicomputer Hardware System and Network Master Plan with the purchase of a Digital Equipment Corporation VAX 4000, Model 300, final host cluster computer system with a fiber optic Ethernet network to serve as a backbone platform for future inprovenents. The total cost of this hardware package will not exceed $567,000 plus tax. Future hardware selection will be reviewed by the Committee as implementation of the specific systems are considered. This platform will support the Laboratory Information Management System (LIPS) which was considered as the next agenda item, provide a fail-safe backup system in the event of hardware problems, and provide the central processor kernel for the next non-financial applications to be implemented. The proposed hardware configuration to support both of these applications includes a savings of approximately $150,000 over the hardware costs for these two proposed applications, if their hardware were to be Purchased and configured individually. 4. LABORATORY ItUUMMON M4MMMENr SYSTEM (LIPS). For several years, the Laboratory management has been evaluating and reviewing laboratory information management systems (L'AS). A LIPS is a computerized system to handle, manipulate, report and store the large data ,irement„ of a laboratory. Attached (gray) is a copy of an article from the Communicator, the trade publication of EMA, Inc., one of the Districts' consultants. Although this article discusses the need for and use of a I.JM in the context of the Safe Drinking Water Act, it is a very goal summary and nay prove to be interesting and informative to the Executive Committee. The Committee and staff reviewed the enclosed staff report (fin) prepared by the Laboratory Division detailing our specific needs and applications. The report includes alternatives and "pay-back analysis," as well as the staff re c mendatdmn. Recommended Action The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends the purchase of LIM software from VG Fiscns utilizing relational data base technology and the fourth generation Structured Query Language (SQL) in conforaonce with Districts' standards. Those standards will allow for simplified fied interface with planned future applications for other Divisions. The total software cost will not exceed $249,600 plus tax. Productivity cost savings are estimated at $190,136 per year when the LIDS is fully operational, providing for a pay-back of total hardware and software costs in 3.2 years. GGS:M:lc ref.FPC91/RFPC5.15-17 Attachments 511619-i JOINT OPERATING FUND BUDGET RE.EW& SUMMARY COMPARISON OF BUDGETED&ACTUAL EXPENDITURES FISCAL YEAR TO DATE 1990-91 (A) IB) ICI (D) (E) (F) (G) Budget Expenditures Expenditures Increase % Increase % Budget Remaining 1990-91 through through or (Decrease) Expended Budget 3/31/91 3/31/90 (Decrease) 1. Net Salaries, Wages & Benefits. $19,286,000 $13,457,536 $11,478,045 $1,979,491 17.25 % 69.78 % $5,828,464 2. Odor Control & Chemical Coagulants. 5,670,000 2,743,199 3,257,184 (513,985) (15.78)% 48.38 % 2,926,801 3. Professional & Contract Services. 9,194,000 5,452,208 4,652,137 800,071 17.20 % 59.30 % 3,741,792 4. Equipment Charges. 245,000 159,229 154,337 4,892 3.17 % 64.99 % 85,771 S. Repair& Maintenance Materials & Services. 3,795,000 2,284,335 2,131,467 152,868 7.17 % 60.19 % 1,510,665 6. Research & Monitoring. 2,694,000 1,710,165 1,423,544 286,621 20.13 % 63.48 % 983,835 7. Utilities. 6,345,000 3,508,037 3,775,212 (267,175) (7.081% 55.29 % 2,836,963 8. Other Materials, Supplies & Outside Services. 2,978,000 2,403,454 1,441,814 961,640 66.70 % 80.71 % 574,546 S. Total Joint Operating Expenses. $50,207,000 $31,718,163 $28,313,740 $3,404,423 12.02 % 63.17 % $18,488,837 10. Revenues & Offsets. (2,600,0001 (2,133,170) (1,760,712) (372,458) 21.15 % 82.05 % (466,830) 11. NET JOINT OPERATING $47,607,000 $29,584,993 $26,553,028 $3,031,965 11.42 % 1 62.14 % 1 $18,022,007 72. Gaftwaga Charge !S's/MG) $478.99 $398.82 $361.53 $37.29 10.31 % 83.26 % 680.17 FPCRPT.XLS JOINT OPERATING FUND&WORKING CAPITAL FUND SUMMARY BUDGET REVIEW 6/10/91 9 MONTHS ENDED 3-31-91 PAGE 1 8 @ & P F. E EXP EXP %EXP INCR INCR / BUDGET THRU BUDGET THRU THRU REMAINING (DECR) (DECR) `DESCRIPTION 1989-90 3.31-90 1990-91 3.31-91 3-31-91 BUDGET 3 % SALARIES.WAGES.&BENEFITS 1 SALARIES&WAGES 1 e 530 000 12.538.433 21,229,000 14,827,810 69.86 6,401,190 2,289,377 18.26 2 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS: 3 RETIREMENT 3,384,000 1,694,952 3,036,000 1,898,346 62.55 1,136,654 203,394 12.00 4 WORKERS COMP 155,000 113,268 155,000 113,271 73.08 41,729 3 0.00 5 UNEMPLOYMENT INS 25,000 16,570 26,000 11,812 47.25 13,188 (4,768) (28.71) 6 GROUP INSURANCE 1,609,000 1,203,183 1,758,000 1,555,641 88.49 202,359 352,458 29.29 7 UNIFORM RENTAL 84000 52364 84000 53622 63.84 30378 1,258 2.40 8 TOTAL BENEFITS 5.157.000 3,080 337 5,057,000 3,832.692 71.83 1.424.308 652 355 17.93 9 SALARIES,WAGES,&BENEFITS 23,687,000 15 818 770 26,286,000 18,460,502 70.23 7.825.498 2.841.732 18.19 10 W.O.SALARIES&BEN.ALLOC. 11 DIRECT CHARGES-CORF/DIST (3,500,000) (2,306,629) 44,000,000) (2,702,347) 67.56 11,297,653) (395.718) 17.18 12 COST ALLOC-CORF/DIST 12.500000 (1834098) (3000000) (2300,619) 78.89 (698381) (466,523) 25.44 13 W.O.SALARIES&BENEFITS 16000,000) (4,140,725) (7000000) (50029661 71.47 (1997034) (882241) 20.82 14 NET J.O.PAYROLL 17,697,000 11,478.045 19,286,000 13,457,536 69.78 5,928.46 1 978 491 17.25 MATL. SUPPLY.&SERVICES i6 GASOLINE,DIESEL&OIL 250,000 120,034 250.000 136,167 54.47 113,833 16,133 13.44 18 INSURANCE 600,000 449,742 600,000 451,871 75.31 148,129 2,129 0.47 MEMBERSHIPS 30,000 14,874 30,000 19,637 65.46 10,363 4,763 32.02 J OFFICE EXPENSE-SUPPLIES 110,000 78,615 120,000 107,225 89.35 12.776 28,610 36.39 �4 -OTHER 56,000 60,686 66,000 68,580 105.51 13,580) 7,894 13.01 20 OPERATING SUPPLIES 21 CHLORINE&0009 CONTROL 2,100,000 1,330,501 2,400,000 1,210,882 50.45 1,189,118 (119,619) MAIM 22 SULFIDE CONTROL 1,000,000 477,200 900,000 365,791 40.64 534,209 (111.409) (23.35) 23 CHEMICAL COAGULENTS 2,587,000 1,449,483 2,370,000 1,166.526 49.22 1,203,474 (282,957) (19.521 24 LAB CHEMICALS&SUPPLIES 140,000 137,535 1861000 160,239 86.15 25.761 22,704 16.51 25 TOOLS 86,000 62,393 96,000 70,972 74.71 24,028 18,579 35.46 26 SOLV, PAINTS,&JAN.SUPPLIES 160,000 81,533 160,000 108,168 72.11 41,832 26,635 32.67 27 OTHER OPERATING SUPPLIES 300,000 170.498 215,000 131,061 60.96 83.939 (39,437) (23.13) 28 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 29 GROUNDSKEEPING 100,000 48,811 125,000 30,871 24.70 94,129 (17,940) (36.75) 30 OUTSIDE LAB SERVICES 400,000 68,429 404,000 84,574 20.93 319,426 10,145 23.59 31 SOLIDS REMOVAL&GATE FEE 5,500,000 3,812,698 6,000,000 3,736,964 62.26 2,263,046 (75,744) 11.99) 32 OTHER WASTE DISPOSAL 185,000 1,594 190,000 133,866 70.35 58,336 132,071 8,286.51 33 OXYGEN PLANT OPER& MTCE 0 0 420,000 250,982 59.73 169,119 250,882 100.00 34 OTHER 635,000 210,021 778,000 447,053 67.40 330,947 237,032 112.66 35 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 38 GENERAL,SPECIAL&LABOR CNSL 275,000 307,116 650,000 494,553 70.09 155,447 187,437 61.03 37 AUDIT&ACCOUNTING 25,000 19,628 27,000 20,884 77.35 6,116 1,256 6.40 38 ENGINEERING 50,000 18,048 75,000 92,015 122.89 117,015) 73,967 409.83 39 OTHER 180,000 166,792 525,000 160,757 30.62 364.243 (5,035) (3.04) 40 PRINTING &PUBLICATION 41 REPRO4N-HOUSE 100,000 86,643 140.000 79,142 56.53 60,058 (6,401) (7.481 PRINTING-OUTSIDE 60,000 46,332 100,000 47,584 47.58 52,416 1,252 2.70 PHOTO PROCESSING 20,000 16,815 25,000 18,648 74.69 6,352 1,833 10.90 4 -/ NOTICES&ADS 75,000 40,912 85,000 72.024 84.73 . 12,976 23,112 47.25 45 RENTS&LEASES 46 OUTSIDE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 100,000 67,186 120,000 72,450 60.38 47.650 5,264 7.83 47 DISTRICT EQUIPMENT RENTAL 100,000 87,151 125,000 86,779 89.42 38,221 (3721 (0.43) JOINT OPERATING FUND&WORKING CAPITAL FUND SUMMARY BUDGET REVIEW 5/10191 9 MONTHS ENDED 3-31-91 PAGE 2 A C $ $ F G y EXP EXP %EXP INCH INCR / BUDGET THOU BUDGET THRU THRU REMAINING (DECRI (DECK) DESCRIPTION 1989-90 3-31-90 1990-91 3.31-91 3.31-91 BUDGET 8 % 48 REPAIRS&MAINTENANCE 49 MATERIALS 3.600,000 2,025,988 3,600,000 2,174,468 60.40 1,425,532 148.480 7.33 50 CONTRACTS 165,000 105,479 195.000 109,867 56.34 85,133 4,388 4.16 51 RESEARCH&MONITORING 52 OCEAN SAMPLEIMONITORING 1,700,000 1.247,154 2,104,000 1,415,329 67.27 688,671 168,175 13.48 53 OCEAN RESEARCHR.W./OPER 370.000 176,390 590,000 294,836 49.97 295.164 119,446 67.15 S4 TRAVEL TRAINING&MEETINGS 125,000 68,406 175,000 105,776 W." 69,224 37,370 54.63 55 UNCOLLECTABLE ACCOUNTS 2.000 241 2.000 0 0.00 2,000 (241) (100.001 56 UTILITIES 57 DIESEL FOR GENERATORS 200,000 681130 200.000 143,921 71.96 56,079 75,791 111.24 58 POWER 6,600.000 3,487,720 6,700,000 3,031,760 53.19 2,668,250 (455,970) (13.07) 59 NATURAL GAS 25g000 54,180 175,000 133,993 76.51 41,107 79,713 147.13 60 TELEPHONE 120,000 70,421 120,000 79,976 66.65 40,024 8,555 13.57 61 WATER 150,000 94,761 150,000 118,497 79.00 31,503 23,736 25.05 62 OTHER EXPENSES 63 FREIGHT 40.000 29,950 45,000 27,286 60.59 17,734 (2.684) 48.981 64 GENERAL 225,G00 2151606 300,000 247,887 82.63 52,113 32,281 14.97 65 AGMD OPERATING FEES 250,000 158,690 300,000 142,043 47.35 157,957 (16,647) (10.49) 66 PRIOR YEARS EXPENSE 50,000 28,231 60,000 110,000 220.00 (60,000) 81,769 289.64 67 OTHER NON-OPER EXPENSE 45,000 27,444 45,000 47,666 105.92 (2,666) 20,222 73.68 TOTAL MATLS,BUFF,&SERV 28 894000 17,285.961 30,921,000 18,009,129 58.24 12 911,871 723,168 4.18 l-leCOST ALLOC-CORF&OTHER (350,000) (450 2661 (600,000) 251,498 41.92) (851,498) 701,764 (166.86) 70 NET J.O:MATLS. SUPP,&SERV. 28,544,000 16,836,695 30,321 000 18,260,627 60.22 12,060,373 1,424,932 8.46 71 TOTAL J. 0.REQUIREMENTS 48,231 000 28,313,7410 49,607,000 31,718,163 03.94 17 888,837 3.404.423 12.02 72 LESS: REVENUE (1,706.000) (1,762,927) (2,006,000) (2,139,827) 106.72 134.827 1376,900) 21.38 COST ALLOCATION 73 -CORF,DISTRICTS.&OTHER 5,000 2,215 5,000 6,857 133.14 (1,SS7)1 4,442 200.64 74 NET REVENUE (1700000) (1760712) (2000000) (2133170) 106.66 133170 (372458) 21.15 75 NET J.O.EXPENDITURES 44 531,000 26,553,028 47,607,000 29,584,993 62.14 18,022,007 3,031,905 11.42 FPD CSDOC 30INT OPERATING HCRN ORDER SUETIPRY 9 M THS EHOED 3/31/91 E i INCR/(OECR) INCR/(DECR) 3/89 3/90 3/91 FROM PR. YEAR FRfl1 PR. YEAR COLL, DIVER. 6 INTERPLANT 94,742 163.663 120.359 (43.304) (26.46) HEADI40A(S 8591869 %I.341 1,305,6Y) 124.286 12.66 PRIMARY TREATMENT 3.T 4,841 3,575.920 3,831.675 255.755 7.15 SECOND(YRY TREATMENT 2.849,051 2.339.140 2.141.744 (19'1,996) (8.46) SOLIDS HANDLING 5,584.19J 5,963,988 5,304.= (659,211) (11.05) EFFLUENT DISINFECTION 81,133 8 ,621 150,016 62.395 71.21 EFFLUENT DISPOSAL b 3.214 1,2]0,033 941.693 (328.340) (25.85) SLPERVISORV C TROL 1.063.326 1.258.459 1.390.938 132.429 30.53 UTILITY SYSTEMS 1,12'l,BB6 1,121.386 1,561,530 4401144 39.25 GENERAL PLANT C LIX 2,206.254 2,041,152 5.063,143 3,021,991 146.05 COOR CONTROL 3,632.531 3,J61,152 3,380,176 (400.9')6) (10.60) GENERAL ENGINEERING 4J .933 767 691.233 (92,534) (11.81) INDUSTRIAL W TE 285.242 368.846 504.S% 135.752 36.W LA3QUITORIES 6 RESEPRCR 2.439,693 2,38),763 2,901.83T9 520.076 21.M MOTOR POOL NET CHARGES 157,062 192.991 2 .517 35,526 18.41 ELECTRIC CARTS 81.�1 106,264 106.3 115 0.11 PORTABLE 02JIPMENT 152.184 128.942 154,749 25,607 20.01 TOTAL J. 0. E1 MSE E25.584.889 E26.553.028 E29.584.993 E3.031,965 11.42 5l10191 QUARTERLY WORKERS' COMPENSATION SELF-INSURED FUND BUDGET REVIEW 9 MONTHS ENDED 3-31-91 A B C D E F 6 EXPENDITURES X EXPENDED REMAINING EXPENDITURES TO DATE 1990-91 THROUGH THROUGH 1990-91 THROUGH INCREASE FROM EXPENDITURES BUDGET 3-31-91 3-31-91 BUDGET 3-31-50 [DECREASE) 7-1-79 ________ ____________ _________ _______ __________ __________ ---------- I Salaries 17,ODO 3,519 20.70 13,4B1 11.156 (7,6371 151,570 2 Claims 110,ODO 108,115 98.29 1,BB5 80,61E 27,497 1,412,249 3 Contractual Services 16,000 16,101 100.63 (101) 12.650 3,451 11B,319 4 Legal Services 3,006 0 0.00 3,000 0 0 0 5 Professional Services 30,ODO 19,688 65.63 10,312 22,337 (2,649) 173,421 6 Supplies S Other 7,000 8,485 121.21 (1,485) 4,753 3,732 16,369 7 Sub Total 183,000 I55,906 85.20 27,092 13I,514 24,394 I,B71,928 8 Excess Loss Policy 35,000 36,259 103.60 11,259) 32,113 4,146 309,413 ________ _________ -------- ________ -------- --------- __________ 9 Total Expenditures 216,000 192,167 88.15 25,833 163,627 2B,540 2,IB1,341 ________ _________ ________ ________ ________ _________ __________ REVENUES 1 RESERVES 10 In-Lieu Premiums 155,000 113,269 73.08 41,731 113,269 0 1,567,280 11 Interest 4 Other 63,000 53,829 05.44 9,171 46,7B7 7,042 762,320 12 Total Revenues 218,000 167,048 76.65 50,902 160,056 7,042 2,329,60U ________ _________ ________ ________ ________ ------__ __________ 13 Excess Revenue (Expense) 0 (25,069) 25,069 (3,571) 121,498) 143,259 _________ ___ ____ 14 Beginning Reserves 696,000 423,328 610,626 0 15 Transfers 0 0 0 250,000 ________ _________ ________ __________ 16 Ending Reserves 696,000 398,259 607,057 398,259 sAccrued 6130/90 WCQB391.XL5 12:33 PM 5110/91 QUARTERLY SELF-FUNDED HEALTH PLAN BUDGET REVIEW `i 9 MONTHS ENDED 3-31-91 A B C B E F G EXPENDITURES Y EXPENDED REMAINING EXPENDITURES TO DATE 1990-91 THROUGH THROUGH 1990-91 THROUGH INCREASE FROM EXPENDITURES BUDGET 3-31-91 3-31-91 BUDGET 3-31-90 (DECREASE) 7-1-79 1 Claims - Medical 946,000 1,374,OB4 145.25 (428,084) 585,036 789,049 6,749,953 2 - Disability* 0 0 0.00 0 6,009 (6,009) 106,671 3 - L.T.D:sability* 0 0 0.00 0 11,806 (11,806) 66,786 4 - Dental 170,000 196,859 115.80 (26,859) 115,690 81,169 1,057,797 5 - Sub-Total 1,116,000 1,570,943 140.77 (454,9431 718,541 852,402 7,98!,207 6 Contractual Services 48,000 41,592 B6.65 6,40E 32,94E 8,644 305,790 7 Stop Loss Insurance 100,000 76,651 76.65 23,349 60,776 15,875 563,144 __________ __________ _________ ________ _________ _________ --------- 0 Total Expenditures 1,264,000 1,689,186 133.64 (425,106) 812,265 876,921 8,851,141 __________ __________ _________ ________ _________ _________ _________ REVENUES Q RESERVES 9 In-Lieu Premiums From - CSDOC 792,000 570,194 71.99 221,906 517,220 52,974 5,192,929 10 - Employe 190,000 154,998 61.59 35,002 117,105 37,893 962,361 _____ ___ ________ ________ _________ ___ ____ _________ 11 - Sub-Tot 982,000 725,I92 73.85 256,S06 634,325 90,867 6,055,290 __________ __________ ________ ________ _________ _________ _________ 12 Reimh from Stop Loss Insurance 0 122,488 1122,4B81 25�229 97,259 332,167 13 Other 0 3,739 (3,939) 1,604 2,331 142,570 14 Total Revenues 982,000 851,619 B6.12 130,301 661,15E 190,461 6,530,027 __________ ________ ________ _________ IS Excess Revenue (Expense) 1282,000) 1837,5671 555,567 1151,1011 (606,460) 12,321,114) 16 Cash and Carry-over Reserves 156,000 142,524 18,552 17 Transfers 282,000 027,050 717,782 2,455,121 __________ __________ _________ -------___ 18 Ending Reserves 156.000 134,007 IB5,227 134,007 *Disability insurance has been purchased rather than self-funded since December 1989 SFQB391.IL9 12:17 PM 5/10/91 D'JAATEALy PUBLIC LIABILITY SELF-INSURED FUND BUDGET REVIEN 3 MONTHS ENDED 3-31-51 A B C D E F 6 EXPENDITURE'S T EXPENDED R-EMAINING EXPENDITURES TO PATE 1990-91 THROUGH THROUGH 1990-91 THROUGH INCREASE FROM EXPENDITURES BUDGET 3-31-91 3-31-91 BUDGET 3-31-90 (DECREASE) 7-1-79 I Salaries 1,000 0 0.00 1,000 0 0 :,715 2 Claims 20,00J 626 3.14 19,372 3,582 (2,954) 30E,263 3 Contractual Services 7,000 3,825 54.64 3,175 3,581 244 60,492 4 Legal Services 33,000 28,665 86.86 4,335 21,2b4 7,401 217,167 5 Professional Services I,006 0 0.00 1,000 0 0 260 6 Supplies 4 Other 2,000 0 0.00 2,000 0 0 0 __________ ____________ __________ ___----- __________ ___________ _________ 7 Suh Total 64,000 33,116 51.75 30,B82 25,427 4,691 5B7,BB7 B Excess Loss Policy* 265,000 0 0.00 265,000 0 0 405,217 __________ ____________ __________ _________ __________ ___________ ------__ 9 Total Expenditures 329.000 33,11E IJ.07 295,BB2 2B,427 4,691 9K,104 REVENUES b RESERVES 10 In-Lieu Preaiums 258,000 173,500 75.00 64,500 193,500 0 1,069,009 It Interest b Otter 140,000 131,064 93.62 8,936 110,959 20,105 1,009,487 12 Allocation to Other funds 0 0 0 0 0 123,929 13 Reia6urseaent from Stop Loss 0 0 0 0 12,004 __________ ---_-------______________ _________ __________ __________ _________ l4 Total Revenues 398,000 324,564 81.55 73,436 304,459 20,105 3,015,229 15 Excess Revenue (Expenses 69,000 291,446 (212,446) 276,032 15.414 2,022,125 _________ ___________ _________ ___________ le Beginning Reserves 1,903,060 1,990,679 1,650,640 17 Transfers 0 0 250,000 __________ ---_------- __________ _________ 18 Ending Reserves 1,972,000 2,272,125 1,526,672 2,272,125 0istncts Entirely Self-Insured for Liability Claies Since duly 1986 PLOE391.X1.5 12:27 PM CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS SCHEDULE 8-1 FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 9 MONTHS ENDED 3/31/91 Page I of (1) (2) (3) (4) Is) (6) WORN ESTIMATED REQUIRED ACCUMULATED ; CURRENT YEAR ; COMPLETED JOBS 1 PROJECT ; UNEXPENDED ORDER ) ; PROJECT BUDGET COST ; OUTLAY ; TRANSFER TO COST BUDGET ( TOTAL 1990-91 ! ! 6/30/90 TO 3/31/91 ; FIXED ASSETS TO DATE 1 - 3 ; 1_____________ i ------------ , ------------ , ------------ ( ______________ i ____________ i _____-____-_ , 1. New and Rebudgeled Major Projects i A. Reclamation Plant 1 1. Xeadworks No.2 ! Plant Xo.l, PI-20/Pl-3I 53702.0/51993-0 ; ( 39,208,126 ( 500,000 i 79,892,057 ; 92,837 0 ; 39,981,891 1 107,163 ) 2. Wastehauler Disposal 1 Sample SIN PI-27.1/2/3 519/2-A,B 1 1 3,040,423 ; 500,000 ; 857,373 ; 518,929 ; 0 ; 1,376,302 ; (18,929) ; 3. Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15, P1-33 53709-0 1 1 41,789,972 ; 17,000,000 ; 17,050,948 ; 16.591,034 ; 0 ; 33,649,982 ; 408,966 ; /. Gas Handling Facilities, PI-34-1 53710-A ; 14,416.910 ; 7,000,000 ; 2,606.896 ; 6,571,973 ; 0 ; 9.258,869 ; 428,021 ; 5. Sludge Handling Facilities, PI-34-2 53710-8 1 20,021,504 ( 8,000.000 9,593,516 10,142.748 0 ; 19,736,261 ; (2,112,718) 6. Digesters 11-16, PI.34-3 53710•C 32,001,665 7,000,000 1,457.753 711,986 0 2,202,739 ( 6,255.014 7. Rehabilitation of Digesters 7 18, 91-35-1 52011-0 ; ; 2,347,809 ; 50.000 ; 2,828,857 ; 88,082 0 ; 2.916.939 ; (38,082) ; B. Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 / 10, PI-35-2 52011-4 ; ; 3,500,000 ; 0 ; 0 300,119 ; 0 ; 300,119 ; (300,119) ; 9. Secondary Trot Expansion to 80 MGD, PI-36 53717-0 ; 31,164.015 600,000 794.693 1,568,713 0 ; 2,363,406 (968,713) 10. Primary Treatment 72 MOD Expansion, PI-37 53719.0 34,000.000 1,000.000 1.199 i 1,139,506 ( 0 1,110,705 (439,506) 11. Rise. Modification, PI-38 52108-A 10,003.211 1,000.000 18.108 24,397 ( 0 42,495 975,613 12. Security 6 Landscaping, PI-38-1 ; ; 1,800,000 500,000 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 500,000 ; 13. Earthquake Work, PI-SB-2 ; ; 1,900,000 400,000 ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 0 ; 400,000 ; 14. Seismic Upgrading 1 Structural Work, PI-38-3 57125-0 ; ; 3,000,000 700.000 ; 0 ; 47,885 ; 0 1 47,895 ; 652,115 ; 15. Fuel System Improvements, A-033-1 51962-G ; ; 222.931 ; 200,000 ; 103,660 ; 115,302 ( 0 218,970 ; 81,690 ; 16. /0 RED Oxygen Activated Sludge 1 DAF's ; ; 66.000,000 ; 0 ; 0 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 17. Belt Presses (1 Units) ; ; 15,500,000 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 10. Solids Storage (/ Bins) ; 11,000,000 0 0 0 ( 0 0 0 19. Digesters: 2 ! 110' Diameter ; ; 9,200,000 0 ; 0 ; 0 ( 0 0 ; 0 ; 20. Standby Power Generation ; ; 7,735,000 0 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 0 21. 12kv Electrical Power Distribution ; 2.800.000 ( 0 0 0 ( 0 0 0 22. Electrification Project ; ; 2,250.000 ; 200,000 ; 0 ; 0 ) 0 ; 0 ; 200,000 ; 23. Raw Sewage Emergency Bypass ; ; 2,000.000 ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 24. Remove Trickling Filters I 1 3 ; ; 1,300,000 ; 0 ; 0 i 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 25. Central Air Compressor Station 250,000 0 0 0 ( 0 0 1 0 26. Misc. Projects (See Schedule C) ; ; 10,250,000 1 1.000.000 ; 71,481 ; 57,183 i 0 1 128,664 ; 942,817 ; ___________ _ __________ _ __________ _ __________ _ __________ _ __________ _ ___________ _ SUBTOTAL • RECLAMATION PLANT 1 ; :367.501,566 1 45,650.000 75,364,549 ; 30,303,684 1 0 1113.668,233 7,346,316 ___________ _ __________ , __________ , __________ , __________ , ---------- , ___________ , CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS SCHEDULE B-I FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 9 ROBINS ENDED 3/31/91 Page 2 of 6 (I) (2) (3) (6) (5) (6) WORK ; ; ESTIMATED REQUIRED ACCUMULATED 1 CURRENT YEAR COMPLETED JOBS ; PROJECT ; UNEXPENDED ORDER PROJECT i BUDGET COST 1 OUTLAY TRANSFER TO COST BUDGET TOTAL i 1990.91 i B 6/30/90 i TO 3/31/91 i FIRED ASSETS ; TO DATE i 1 - 3 ; i------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ i -------------- i ------------ i _-_____----- , B. Treatment Plant 2 1. Support Facilities and Site Improvements ( ; 0 a. Operations Building, P2-23-5-1 53715-0 ( 3,625,000 100.000 13,102 ( 43.651 0 56,753 $6,349 b. Warehouse Building, P2-35-2 SI613-H ; ; 5,264,000 250,000 2.354 ; 12.285 ; 0 16,639 ; 237.715 ; c. Maintenance Building , P2-35-3 51813-F ; ; 5,264,000 ; 250,000 2,356 ; 11,351 ; 0 ; 13,705 238,649 ' , d. Construction Management Office, P2-35-4 51813-C ; ; 1.302,000 0 2,356 ; 8,435 ; 0 10,789 (8,635) i e. Phase 11 Site and Security Improvements, P2-35.5 51813-E ; ; 2,305,000 100.000 3,033 8,615 ; 0 ; 11,668 ; 91,385 ; 2. Rise Mod. A Improvements to Facilities, P2-37 51979.0 ; ; 8,158,000 1,000,000 ; 7,556,322 302,621 ; 0 ; 7,850,143 ; 697,379 ; 3. Rehab Digester I, J, A. P2-39-1 (P2.39 Design Only) 52045-0 ; ; 3,381,000 ; 1,500,000 194,970 ; 18.023 ; 0 ; 412,913 ; 1,481,977 ; W. Rehab Digester L, M, P2.39.2 i i 3,000,000 0 ; 0 0 0 0 ; 5. Rehab Digester N, 0, P2-39-3 ; ; 4,000,000 ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 0 0 6. Process Control Improvements, P2.60 51068-B ; ; 431.000 '; 250,000 106.210 150,540 ; 0 ; 256,750 ! 99,660 ; 7. Primary Treatment 26 MOD Expansion, P2-4I 53714-0 ; ; 15,000.000 ; 0 ; 0 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 B. Secondary Treatment Expansion, P2-62 $3718.0 ( ; 21,214,000 ; 2,000,000 359,935 674,228 0 1,034,163 ; 1,325,772 Transfer to Project Below ( 0 ; ( ; 0 0 P2-62-2A Furnish and Install Secondary Clarifier ; ; ; ; ; 0 0 ; Sludge Collection Equipment 53718-8 i ; 2,018,000 ; 0 0 ; ; 0 0 ; 9. Electrification Project, P2-42-1 53718-A 14,000.000 1.000,000 11921 i 19,409 0 21,330 990,591 10. Rise. Modifications, P2.63-1 52108-8 ; ; 3,509,000 500,000 ; 16,971 ; 17,695 ; 0 ; 36,666 ; 482,305 11. Earthquake Work, P2-43-2 52108-C ) ; 3,000.000 500,000 0 77,524 0 77,526 ( 622,476 ; 12. Seismic Upgrading 6 Structural Work, P2-63-3 ; ; 4,305,000 705,000 ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 705,000 ; 13. Monitoring/Control System, P2.66 52094-0 ; ; 4,010,000 ; 2.000,000 ; 56,056 ; 20,322 ; 0 76,378 ; 1,979,67B ; 16. Fuel System Improvements, P-033.2 $1962-H ; ; 263.000 ; 150,000 ; 36,680 133,646 0 ; 168,126 ; 16,356 15. Standby Power Generation ; ; 9,200,000 0 ; 0 0 0 0 0 16. Solids Storage: 2 Bins ; ; 5,200.000 ; ; 0 ; 0 0 ; 0 17. Additional 105 Foot Digester ; ; 4,000,000 ; ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 18. Potable Water Distribution System i i 3,800,000 0 0 0 i 0 0 i 0 i 19. Plant Water Pump Station ; ; 1,200.000 ; ; ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 20. Misc. Projects (See Schedule D) i i 10,400,000 1,000,000 312,493 409,753 0 ; 722,246 ; 590,247 ___________ _ __________ _ __________ _ __________ ---------- i ---------- -----______ i 9,396,102 SUB-TOTAL - TREATMENT PLANT 2 i i1---------- 1 1 --------- --------- --------- 0 i --------- --------- i Evua anAs"romxl rM SnneAr Or lOwl M55 LMIMIIN I[NIA{APIf scxNOt[11 RICK IM IwF11 •MINSNs Mro 3I311% PM].l A (1) (I) I]) (1) (f) (6) N9 ; [SIInA1E0 A[NIM A .". ; issur"K ;!wolf",1N! ; ma. I N[IS[NN I MN ; I IAw[Ll I000E1 MI MNy ; IAMf[A 9 ; Ml MET { ; IOTA Me-11 ; 6 61N/K 113131191 ; HIM ME" ; 10 Mf ' 1 -3 C. IWIAMIM that Sim , , MAMA... MAMA......_.. MAMA...---MAMA.. : ............ _------------ MAMA...._._I_.......... , 1.51te utionlAl ; I,M.M : S,M,M 1 l,HI i.Ed rtiw u olnl! UIUi ;61,M,M ----M I IN,W • ----_ (Kd") ; =-TOTAL- AILLMIIN ALLOWS ; ; ".M.M i 5.110.0111 ; 0 ; lux { 0 1 W.M : 61945,1111 ; ,MAMA----------- - ------MAMA..-. I ........... , ----------- I MAMA_..-_MAMA... I_-----_--- {----_.--- , 0. Inte,plut M hint facilities 1. lawrolNt .loll., 1.1 31111.0 ; SEE ISLAS i I HIM M,M 0 MIM (M.M) A. IN' 4wrtlwt IT. ; 21.01$.M 16.M,M a 1 1 I 1 6.M,M A. Im"Int allip Lane ; 6,60.M I,M,M 0 1 1 I : I,M,M C. SNwtrlal N.la if" ; S,wO,M I,M,M a 1 0 1 { I,M,M A. OIS.cI , SAN if. ; I.NO,M M.M a 1 0 1 { M.M I A. usn"Icl11AIn Cable I2a.M IM.M 0 1 A I IN,M 2. Swwrl faclll.la Aw Sit.Iyrar.aIll a 6 a 1 1 A. Main. wilding Inn. 6 wine.. 3-1-4.1{-5 511314.11 ; 5,756,155 1 SIM ON ; 5,07SI911 1 I,M,W ; 1 : 6.M.19 { (6w.W) ; Iranbr to Prelacl gain I { 1 (SIM) ; I i (4221) ; NL&Rehr.TrMrary Ltu,pn STOP A : I'm : &.in ; 16.0 I 6 { HIM ; (LM) ; A. Aab.b/tons Ent lab to Office it Pit 1, J-11-1 SMS4 ; ; 1,451.115 ; 1 i 2.0 ; 9.14 ; 1 { HIM ; (1.111) ; I. C ntr l laboratory, 3-17 UM-• ; ; 1,91,111 1 6,M,M 11,91.70 2,99I,213 ; 1 ; COLLINS ; I,M.IU i d. ErPrIu/Naht.w.11M. A III MI J-N SIM4 ; ; 2,151,5141 ; M,M i 3,91I,131 ; W.W ; 1 ; 1,91,K1 ; (M.W) ; a. Operation/central Enter, 3-23-1-2 WIt-A,1{ ; AIMS" ; I,M,M ; Mim ; KIM ; 1 : Ki.M 1,111,M ; 1. Wrenn] NUAlel at Olt 1, J-K WIH : I I.M.M 1 1K,M I SIM ; iff" I I { I5,&1 ; P.M ; 1. 01aolitian of Most kiln at Ploal 1.J." S2N14 : 1 51,1411 1 TIME I $.an ; 1 { JI,M I 11,W) ; J. Lenlnl Wraralla.owllit2 I I 1 • 1 A. [Plpnnt Ar.actuN,1-M UNIT ; N.I01,M S.M.M i 16.M,M ; 3,110'"1 1 N,M,"J ; I,M,M A. Minn.Persian. MAP W11•A.1; ; 3,123,830 3,09,M 1 6 3.M.M A. Plant 1 facility,J-I9-1 UNIJ { ; 16,I25.IN ; 6.M,M 1,161,213 KS,"/ I / I T,IKIM ; S,SAM A. Pint I SANWA,,J-19-2 UNIT ; ; N,w1.151 ; I,M.M 7,408,011 ; 1.96,2U ; a ; 15,M,316 1 25,757 ; iawfac to Project&IN 111,010.M) ; I (I,W,M) ; [.left.Iwtnl In ISM[wrPwl Wooten 913F1 { ; I.M.M 1.040.M 0 i M ; M ; I,M.211 ; 1.wet.in r1AIn, 1-21. 1.210 5N { 70,113 ; M,M M."1 ; "IM : 0 M.M : UAW ; S. Elfall 1 I.ter Pan Station 0 0 ; I I 6 i 1 { O 1 A.wKlt....I of IN'&1f.11 Maser. J-22-1 (teal UITW .I I SIMILAR I,M,M ; 2,110,2E ; SIM 1 6 1 2,19,W I M,M I A. Replace Defall w. 1 Ew Sactian, J-22-2 I ; 2,500,0N ; 1 ; 0 ; A I 6 ; 5 ; 0 ; 0. we MIT. I.,U. 1, 1-22-3 I 11.000.0" I a I a ; A I 1 I 0 { a I A. Trip L"".Sion for 00411 No. ] 2.NO.M { a f A ; A ; 1 ; 1 { 0 ; A. Sarin OtacAarP look,MS 'L' ; ""O.He a I A 1 1 1 I. Eaton n' to NAN later Alto IN'&VALE ; 40.wo,M 1 A 0 1 a A 1. Wheat il.ater M?set AtlIIN,J-24I20/20 SM5.1 11 534,601 1 M,M I SI ; VI I 6 ; M,1" ; 2111,115 ; y.A..wnthe of utlllp Attu, J-N 9216.0 ; ; 2.500.M ; M,M { • ; 9,M I I I 9,M ; INITIAL ; A. te epa n.p.tentry/A.l Loring Ewnlo. ; 3.000,M I M,M 1 • 1 • I 6 I 0 i M.M ; 1. PAIRMAaco&mPwnt AMter Srrtw 9001000 MIM ' 0 ; 1 I 1 I 1 ; M.M It. Mature ]MAINTAIN link 5aplac.n t SO.00o,Ow 0 A ; 6 1 I I I I a l it. Electrical over Srnw3 haabillut1K Stedin .,Ioo,M ; MIM I A ; 1 ; 6 I AT I M.M ; 1t. Slid,.timeni NI.Jwt. 1 I A 1 6 1 a. Lc.MI MINIMUM steel ; 9.NO,M a 0 6 1 0 1 A. Tom APtaltien ; 23.000,M 1 0 1 I 0 1 c. UNIT]] wveMnnt Phase I ; 10.600,Ow 1 a I I 1 1 1 1 A. tampon facility I ; 50,100,0w A 1 1 5 6 1 11. Otac project,(a..Aweel.[) ; ; 10.100.000 ; I.M,M I 115.1% ; 111.M ; 5 ; M,19 1 MIST/ { { ------....... I_._------- ]MAMA.-MAMA----- I ----------- WINTER. - INTERPLANT A"III { :W.111.511 ; 31.1K,M 1 62,M,IN ; N,M.M I 1 ;".m.geS I I1,W,A1 { i------------ {_._------- I__._. I _..�.� I-._-------- I ............ I ............ I M-IOTA[ - KM PMEL15 { 1115,610M 1 ",M.M ;IN,I11,M ; U.M.M 1 6 ;19.SA3.M 111.NI.M i CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SUMMARY OF JOINT MORNS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS SCHEDULE 0-1 FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 9 MONTHS ENDED 3/31191 Page 1 of / (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) MORN ( ( ESTIMATED REQUIRED ACCUMULATED CURRENT YEAR ; COMPLETED JOBS 1 PROJECT UNEXPENDED ORDER ' PROJECT BUDGET COST OUTLAY TRANSFER TO COST BUDGET ( ' TOTAL ) 1990-91 0 6/30/90 j TO 3/31191 ( FIXED ASSETS TO DATE I - 3 2. Special Projects, Studies 6 Research ii 0 ( i A. Action Plan - AIDES Permit Application 58208f 276,000 ; 15,000 167,666 51,91/ 0 219,580 ; 23,086 0 B. Solids Treatment and Disposal Projects ) ( ( 0 1. Sludge Disposal Projects ) ( 600,000 25,000 0 0 ;� 0 0 ;� 25,000 Transfer to Projects Below ( ( 0 0 Solids Disposal Phase III- Landfill Option SB207-A ; ; ; 15,611 ( 0 0 ! 15,611 0 ; Sludge Disposal Related Projects 58214-0 ' 162,000 102,655 ( 92.742 0 195,397 (92,742) 2. Sludge Reuse Projects 600,000 ; 25,000 0 ( 0 0 0 25.000 i C. Deep Ocean Disposal Evaluation 51159-0 ; 2,229,000 50,000 ( 578,529 0 0 578,52 50,000 0 ) ( � 0 0 D. Air Quality Control Program ; i 3,224,000 ; 0 0 ; 1. Air Tonics Inventory (A82588 N/ PEEP) 58218-0 ( 1,975,000 ) 925,000 ( IS0,238 559.414 0 709,652 ; 365,SB6 ; Transfer to Project Below ( ; (123,1/2) ; 0 ; (423,142) ; Air Towicf Emissions Inventory Report (HEIR) and Health Risk Assessment (NAP) . 58218-A ' ; 423,142 423,142 ( 0 i 0 423,142 2. VOC/ROG RACY Demonstration Program ( 600,000 ) S0,000 ( 0 0 0 0 50,000 S. Future Projects i i 3,500,000 ( ( 0 0 E. Chemical Handling and Control Improvements 100,000 ( 10,000 0 0 0 0 10,000 F. Central Laboratory Development Program 55,000 ( 25,000 0 0 0 0 25,000 ) ' ( 0 0 G. Rate, Conservation Projects i 1,220,000 ) 70,000 ; 0 0 0 0 70,000 ( ' ) 0 0 0. Water Reclamation R&D and Spec Projects 900.000 100,000 1 0 0 0 0 100,000 SUB-TOTAL - SPECIAL PROJECTS 15,944,142 1,355,000 1,01/,699 704,070 0 1.718.769 650,930 3. Equipment Items 39.224,000 ; 2.262,000 551,237 964,357 (954,466) 561,128 ; 1,297,643 ; SUBTOTAL - JOINT NORMS CONSTRUCIRUCTION REQUIREMENTS 1 :965,030,222 :103.422,000 :128,115,516 60,132,3S5 (954.466) :187,623,3B5 ) /3,289,665 ) CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS COMPLETED AT 6/30/90 SCHEDULE F : ) ) 57,819,061 ) $2,631 (26,387.893) 31,513.802 (82.631) TOTAL JOINT NORMS CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS :965,838,222 i103,122,000 1186,264.580 60,214,966 (27,342,359) :219,137,187 43,207,034 , , COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA May9, 1991 IOM4 ELLIS AVENUE FO.BOX 0127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFOMIA 92728.8127 STAFF REPORT. U141992.2411 MINICOMPUTER HARDWARE SYSTEM AND NETWORK MASTER PLAN SUMMARY The growth of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County has resulted in the increased need of more sophisticated computer applications than can be adequately provided by the existing computer resources at the Districts. A new minicomputer system is needed to support a Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) and a Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS). The need for the LIMS is immediate, whereas the CMMS is still being studied at this writing. The details regarding the need and selection of the LIMS and CMMS will be given in separate reports. The report on the LIMS from Dr. Louis Sangermano is dated May 9, 1991. The report on the CMMS is still in preparation at this writing. The following report outlines the Information Services Division's Computerization Plan for the next 3 to 5 years. It reports the Districts' present state of computerization and report of projects in progress. The report concludes with a proposed plan for supporting the planned computer applications for the next 3 to 5 years. The Information Services Division is proposing the purchase of a VAX 4000 model 300 dual host cluster computer system with an fiber-optic Ethernet network for a cost not to exceed $567,000 plus tax. This purchase will provide for phase 1 of the Information Services Computerization Plan as outlined in the attached report. This combined system will save the Districts approximately$150,000 over the cost of providing an adequate system for LIMS and CMMS separately. Details regarding the choice and selection of the computer hardware platform are outlined in the following report. PURPOSE: The purpose of this report is to document the plan for the continuing implementation of computer automation at CSDOC over the next 3 to 5 years. Supporting data will be presented on the present state of automation, work in progress, current industry trends in computer hardware and software, and standards that have been implemented already at the Districts. Finally, a detailed proposal will be presented for approval of the implementation of the first phase of this plan. The proposed implementation will fully support one application—a Laboratory Information Management System and the majority of the hardware necessary for a second application — Computerized Maintenance Management System. 1 May 9, 1991 PRESENT STATUS: Attachment A gives a detailed account of the computers in use within each Department at CSDOC and each Division within each Department. In summary there are at the present time: 1. IBM or IBM-compatible personal computers (PCs): quantity 145. These computers are used throughout the Districts for the following major applications: Word Processing Spreadsheets Database Management Communications Graphics Numerous special purpose functions such as instrument data acquisition, modeling, mathematical and statistical analysis, etc. The majority (115) of these computers are linked together in Local Area Networks (LANs). LANs allow the computers that are linked together to share the data and software that reside on common "file server"computers. At present, the Districts have PCs on each of the 8 LANs listed in Attachment B. Five of the LAN file servers are "bridged" to allow the transfer of files across LAN "boundaries". Three of the above are not bridged. Personnel is not bridged for security reasons; Operations, Plant 2 for reasons of distance; and Purchasing due to lack of a practical cable pathway at present. These will all be bridged when the limitations mentioned can be mastered. 2. ODS/CPT computers: quantity 16. These computers were originally designed as dedicated word processors and are based upon 10 year old technology. The more recent models (CPT 9000) are "based upon"the IBM PC/AT architecture but are Mt IBM compatible. These form a ODS/CPT network. The continued use of these systems should be evaluated and compared to replacing them with more modern IBM-compatible systems. 3. Data General Eclipse minicomputer: auantily 1. This is a very antiquated computer which, by Data General's own admission, has reached the end of its technological fife cycle. Additionally, the Districts have outgrown this computer's capacity to expand. The software system is one-of-a-kind and extremely difficult to maintain. The financial and accounting software lacks 2 May 9, 1991 flexibility, ad hoc report capability, and the power that more modern software systems have enjoyed for many years. 4. CDC Cyber 1820 computers: auantity 2. These computers are installed in the Operations Center at Plant No. 2 and function as process monitors for the treatment processes at that plant. The two computers operate in tandem as a tail safe" feature. Their replacement is being designed as part of Job No. J-23-2, which is in progress. 5. Rusco Card Entry MAC 544 Micro Access Controller: quantity 1. This is a special-purpose microcomputer for controlling the card-key entry access system at Plant No. 1. It is dedicated to this one function and cannot be utilized for any other purpose. 6. Rusco 525 Fuel Access Systems: quantity 2 This is a special-purpose microcomputer for controlling and monitoring the access to the gasoline pumps at both plants, respectively. They are dedicated to this one function and cannot be utilized for any other purpose. 7. Motorola Entrac 2000 Telemetry System: quantity 1. This is a special- purpose computer system for polling and collecting radio telemetry from our _ various pump stations. This system is due to be replaced with a new system, which is being studied at the present time. The present system's specialized design prevents the system from being placed in use for any other purpose. Although the Districts have obtained an appreciable amount of computer resources over the last 3 to 5 years, we are still in the genesis of developing the integrated information network necessary for the optimum functioning of a wasterwater treatment operation of our size. This is discussed in greater detail in the section titled Analysis. WORK IN PROGRESS At the present time there are three computer-related projects in progress: 1. Job No. J-23-2: Plant 1 Control Center Instrumentation and Replacement of Computerized Montorina System at Plant No. 2. Job No. 132-44. This job will include the replacement of the antiquated process monitoring computers at Plant No. 2 with modern computers to enhance process monitoring and control. Similarly, an identical system will be installed at Plant No. 1 where no such system has existed previously. At this writing, this contract is out to bid; the bid opening scheduled May 21, 1991. "' 3 May 9, 1991 2. Job No. 1-9: Interplant Pipeline and Utilities. One of the tasks involved in this project is the installation of a fiberoptic voice and data link between Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2. This connection will enable the transmission of telephone, telemetry and data between the two plants with greater speed, reliability, efficiency and lower cost than is now possible. At this writing, this project is out to bid; the bid opening is scheduled for May 21, 1991. 3. Job No J-25: Utility Mapping. This project will involve digitizing the numerous 'as built' drawings of facilities and utility lines throughout Plants 1 and 2, utilizing AutoCAD. This will enable the Districts to more efficiently and effectively plan for new installations and make modifications to existing facilities with less error and rework. This will also allow the Districts to more easily coordinate design work with the Districts' many consulting engineering firms which have had such technology for years. At this writing, this project has been approved by the Board of Directors and the scope of work is being prepared. PLANNED ADDITIONS In addition to the work in progress mentioned above, there are four major applications which are in various stages of preparation at this time: 1. Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS). This system is required by our Laboratory to enable it to retain certification. This system will enable automatic identification and tracking of laboratory samples and reporting of test results. It will also automate the data collection from the digital output of numerous test instruments in use in the Laboratory. The LIMS requirements of a Laboratory operation of our size, complexity and needs preclude the use of a PC-based solution. Further details are found in Dr. Louis Sangermano's Staff Report on the LIMS, dated May 9, 1991. 2. Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS). This system will automate our work order processing and documentation, preventive, corrective and emergency maintenance scheduling, and provide a means of coordinating all data relative to the functioning of Districts' equipment to track performance and repair history. Additional extensions to the system will allow the Districts to display facilities maps, CAD drawings, utility atlases, and detailed schematics on display screens to assist Districts personnel in performing maintenance and repair activities. The Districts received a federal grant for the construction of new facilities many years ago, administered by the State Water Resources Control Board. The final funding of this grant(approximately$1.1 million) has been held up contingent upon 4 May 9, 1991 CSDOC implementing a Computerized Maintenance Management System. Numerous proposals have been investigated over the last several years. The Maintenance Department has been actively investigating several proposed solutions and is nearing the completion of their study. A final proposal should be forthcoming in the next few months. Throughout the study of various CMM solutions, it has been evident in each instance that a PC LAN based solution would not suffice for the Districts' needs. 3. Purchasing and Inventory Management. The Districts' present system for purchasing and inventory management is antiquated and becoming increasingly cost ineffective. Numerous small programs have been written and are being written to work around the failings of the present system, creating a total 'patchwork" system. The system has outlived its usefulness and now requires an inordinate amount of staffing to manage the paper generated by what should be a 'paperless" or nearly paperless system. All of the major vendors which our Purchasing Division deals with have progressed to modern Transaction Processing Systems which our present systems can only deal with on a very rudimentary basis. Additionally, costly errors may result from the duplications, lost paperwork, missfilings, and other clerical errors possible under this system. The Purchasing Division has submitted a budget request for fiscal 1991-92 for a new system to overcome these and many other failings of the present system. A new system will allow for on-line Purchase Requisition and Purchase Order processing, tie-in with Warehouse inventory to determine stock on-hand,automated inventory verification, ad-hoc reporting, and many other functions identified by Purchasing staff. 4. Finance. Accounting and Payroll. The Districts' present system, hosted an the Data General Eclipse computer, is also feeling its age. The computer hardware is out of production and it is increasingly difficult to find repair parts. We have also outgrown the physical capacity of the hardware and are unable to expand as needed. Greater concern is placed upon the software: the operating system is not proprietary to Data General and,therefore, is unsupported by them. The operating system and the application software are customized. Except for the operating system, this is not necessarily "bad". However, the application software is truly "one-of-a-kind" with no other company, agency or entity of any kind is still using it. We have been fortunate to be able to obtain the support that we have from independent vendors. However, we are functioning in a very tenuous situation. The Finance Department is engaged at this time in investigating numerous alternatives for new hardware and software systems. A proposal is expected sometime in fiscal 1991-92. 5 May 9, 1991 COMPUTER HARDWARE TRENDS Historically, the use of computers in the business environment began in the 1960's with what is referred to as computer "main frames". These large, monolithic computers still exist today but the capacities of yesterday's "main frames" are now found in minicomputers and microcomputers (otherwise known as PCs). Large-scale computers of today are normally used for large batch-oriented processing. This type of processing is not typical of any of our operations at CSDOC at this time, nor is expected to be at any time in the future. The 1980s began the age of the PC (microcomputers). CSDOC, as evidenced by the present status of computerization given at the beginning of this report, is one of the beneficiaries of this new era of computerization. As powerful as these new microcomputers might be,the users of these computers have an increased need to share data. Additionally, cost savings are demonstrable for sharing of programs. This has led to the introduction of "file servers" and Local Area Networks (LANs). Bridging the gap between large-scale main frame computers and the PC are the "minicomputers". These computers possess much greater power than the PC and enable many users to share a single computer at the same time. However, their cost is a mere fraction of the cost of a main frame computer. Within the business world,the trend in computerization is away from centralized computer processing and towards decentralization. This is evidenced by the turn toward the use of PCs and LANs. However, as "departmental computing"has reached fruition, it has also been realized that too often little "islands' of technology have resulted within an organization when data sharing across organizational boundaries has not been facilitated. Merely "bridging" LANs has not proved to be satisfactory. Additionally, the computing needs of some organizations have shown that LANs are not the "magic" solution they once were assumed to be and that LANs have limitations on what can be expected of them. In this instance, enhanced networking is needed, introducing more computing power to the total network. The latest trend is to introduce minicomputers into the total network environment, utilizing multivendor support and a peer-to-peer relationship between each element of the network (as opposed to a master-slave relationship). This enriched network configuration will expand and magnify the capabilities of the existing hardware and networks, extending their usefulness for many more years. SOFIWARE TRENDS It has long been recognized that the high cost of original software development increases the importance of utilizing off-the-shelf software as much as possible. Systems for all facets of wastewater treatment and support activities are being produced in increasing 6 ... May 9, 1991 numbers. The software industry trend is toward the use of relational data base management systems (DBMS) and, in particular, toward the use of a DBMS that utilizes the Structured Query Language interface (SOL). Concurrently, the use of programming languages have followed similar trends away from 3rd generation languages such as COBOL and Fortran and towards 4th generation languages, where such programming languages are necessary. As most applications are data base-intensive, the SQL-based languages utilized in most new DBMS systems today come complete with their own application generation tools, making traditional programming languages unnecessary. SANITATION DISTRICTS STANDARDS Existing The CSDOC Collection, Treatment, and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, "2020 Vision", outlines the standards recommended for the automated process monitoring and control activities for the Districts. This is found in "Computer Control, Monitoring and Data Handling Systems, Volume 5" on pages 1.2-1.3 and pages 4.10-4.11. This document states that 'the capability of the SCSs (satellite control stations) and the CCSs (central control stations) to communicate via a high-speed network is a critical consideration in the selection of computer system hardware and software." The Master Plan then specifies that the best solution is the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 802.3 network standard. As of this writing, this recommendation is still the best solution available. The Master Plan goes on to state that the "computer and network products by Digital Equipment Corporation are particularly well suited to control applications, are fully compliant with this network standard, and are therefore recommended for CSDOC's consideration..." Recently completed projects have been in compliance with the recommendations of the Master Plan. The Ocean Outfall Booster Station control room computers supplied by Fischer-Porter are all comprised of components and operating system software produced by Digital Equipment Corporation (hereafter termed DEC) and compliant with the IEEE 802.3 standard. Work in progress is also following the guidelines of the Master Plan. The detailed specifications and plans for Plant 1 Control Center Instrumentation Job. No. J-23-2 and Replacement of Computerized Monitoring Systems at Plant No. 2 Job. No. P2-44 call for computers and networks supplied by Digital Equipment Corporation, to be supplied by the vendor who will be awarded the contract for the project. All of the vendors who will be bidding, have designed and installed such process monitoring and control systems. They have long-recognized that their customized application software is best served by adhering to the IEEE 802.3 standard and that the equipment and network products of DEC provide the most reliable platform upon which to base their application. �. 7 May 9, 1991 Future Extensions New industry standards are emerging, each worth consideration of adoption by the Districts. One such standard is the Open Systems Interconnect standard or OSI. This standard provides common interfaces to allow software systems from dissimilar systems and manufacturers to not only share data, but actually be able to share processing. Another standard that is being developed by the Department of Defense for all federal applications is known as Portable Operating System Interchange or POSIX. This standard addresses the issue of allowing a system to not only process electronic data, but also electronic imaging of pictures and documents. A third standard that has been developed is Document Data Interchange Format or DDIF. This standard addresses the unique needs of handling FAX imaging data interchange and Email systems standardization. Other standards being developed recognize the growing importance of the 'endows" environment and the Graphical User Interface (GUI). Attachment C shows relevant information processing services and the applicable standards that meet the services listed. ANALYSIS It is the goal of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County to protect the environment by providing a state-of-the-art wastewater management program. This is done by striving to achieve the best effluent quality possible based on scientifically based ... appropriate treatment levels, within the constraints of all applicable regulatory oversight and at the lowest cost to the people served by the Districts. The responsibility of the Districts extends to prudent planning to anticipate growth in the County as well as ever- changing areas of environmental concern. The CSDOC Master Plan, adopted by the Boards in 1989, provides for a 30 year "road map" based upon exhaustive planning and input from numerous sources. However, to be a Master Plan should address computerized automation of the management, administrative and other support activities as well as plant operations. This Master Plan for Information Services is admittedly limited to a view of applications, hardware, and software over a relatively short period of time. However, a much broader view can and should be focused upon these broader issues. As these concerns are addressed, a more definitive Information Services Master Plan can be developed to address the information needs of administration and management over the 30 year span being addressed. Such information needs can be projected, even if the supporting technology changes rapidly every 3 to 5 years. Attachment D illustrates six stages of data processing growth (or maturity) according to Richard L. Nolan, as reprinted from Harvard Business Review. CSDOC has progressed through stages I, II and III. We now stand on the brink of crossing over from stage III to _ v 8 May 9, 1991 �. stage IV -- the integration of data processing systems. We have an increased need to retrofit existing applications using newer, more efficient data base technology. As an organization, Information Services has served the various divisions and departments as an internal 'consultant" and cost-cutting "watchdog" to prevent rampant overrun of computer-related activities. That role needs to change to one of fostering interchange between divisions and departments on the effective sharing of data resources. Individual computer users must begin to learn accountability for their own data resource integrity and stewardship. The changes proposed in Information Services general recommendations below, will move CSDOC fully into stage IV and, by the end of the anticipated 3 to 5 year plan, into stage V. All future planning should make effective use of as much of the Districts' existing computer technology as possible. This will serve to conserve the Districts' investment, extend the effective fife span and not relegate existing computers to premature obsolescence. No industry-wide standard addresses this problem but numerous manufacturers have sought to approach it in various ways. The Information Services Division is sensitive to the issues that could be raised by a public agency recommending the computer hardware and network products of a single manufacturer. However, we feel that the Districts will best serve the public good and guard the investment of public funds by establishing a standard for future computer hardware and networking for the following reasons: 1. Compatibility with existing systems. The systems mentioned previously, such as COBS, together with the work in progress noted, all are DEC based systems. Although we have been fortunate so far that the bidders who have been awarded the contracts for these projects have chosen to bid DEC equipment, the specifications have, in some instances, only stipulated that the solutions be "DEC compatible". In the PC world, an 'IBM compatible" PC is sometimes referred to as a "clone". Only in the rarest of circumstances are such systems found to be incompatible. However, the size and complexity of the systems being planned for the future at the Districts cannot use the same analogy to assure compatibility of systems. At a PC level, small differences can be sorted out with relative ease. However, if numerous vendors with various hardware and network products, all claiming "DEC compatibility" are involved in the Districts' future, an integration and support nightmare of biblical proportions is virtually assured. 2. IEEE 802.3 standard compliance. Although other manufacturers have adopted this standard, this standard was written by DEC, in conjunction with Intel and Xerox. (The name for DEC's product for this standard is known as Ethernet. Their software protocol for Ethernet is called DECnet.) DEC is more conversant in the IEEE 802.3 standard implementation than any other manufacturer. 9 May 9, 1991 3. OSI standard compliance. DEC's hardware and network systems are fully compliant with the new OSI standard for compatibility. 4. Compliance with other relevant standards. DEC is fully compliant with all standards listed in Attachment B, those listed above, as well as DDIF. With the release of DECnet Phase V later this spring, DEC will possess the first proprietary operating system compliant with POSIX. (DECnet is DEC's software protocol for IEEE 802.3 compliance.) No other computer manufacturer has even announced progress toward achieving POSIX compliance. 5. Network Application Support (NAS). DEC is the only manufacturer to fully address the integration of multivendor technologies in a common network architecture using industry standard network protocols. NAS means that a graphic created on an Apple, the spreadsheet done using MS-DOS on a PC, the design drawn on a UNIX workstation,the documentation generated on a VAX system, and the data stored on an IBM mainframe can be exchanged among applications and even combined to work within the same application. (VAX is a trademark of Digital Equipment Corporation,) This will serve the Districts' needs, not only for the present, but it will also provide for future operating systems to be implemented (such as UNIX) if the Districts finds it advantageous to do so. NAS will allow the Districts to retain their existing LANs and PCs and simply integrate them in to the global network. This network will allow minicomputers and PCs alike to �.. communicate, share data and devices in a true "peer-to-peer" relationship. The basic structure of NAS is illustrated in Attachment E. 6. Compound Document Architecture. DEC has implemented a standard for allowing the processing of document, imaging and windows environment within the context of the NAS technology. This will support the enhanced features planned for the Districts' CMM System. 7. Clustering of CPUs. DEC is the only minicomputer manufacturer that has implemented a "cluster" architecture for its computer products to enable two or more CPUs to function in a synergistic processing relationship. The existing computer systems at Plant No. 2 are installed in such a manner that if one of them fails, the other continues processing data instantly while the failed computer undergoes repairs. The detailed specifications and plans for Plant 1 Control Center Instrumentation Job. No. J-23-2 and Replacement of Computerized Monitoring Systems at Plant No. 2 Job. No. P2-44 call for the same arrangement in the new systems at both plants. DEC's clustering concept automatically provides for this ''fail over" feature with reduced cost on both hardware and systems software. However, instead of one CPU sitting idle waiting for the other to fail, DEC utilizes the processing power of both CPUs in a synergistic processing 10 May 9, 1991 environment. This clustered environment also provides for"disk shadowing"which enables data to be stored on more than one disk at a time. This way, if a disk drive fails, no on-line data is lost. This provides even greater protection than backup tapes alone — all at a relatively low cost. This is discussed in more detail in Attachment G. 8. Flexibility and Scalability - DEC products allow the Districts to apply computing power in centralized or distributed arrangements with no change to application software. Additionally, DEC processors can be "scaled", meaning that no expensive software changes are required as faster or newer processor technology is introduced, offering excellent investment protection. 9. Software Availability - There are more than 8,500 applications written for the VAX/VMS platform. (VAX is DEC's standard line of minicomputer and VMS is the proprietary operating system for the VAX line.) Most importantly, DEC has made a major commitment to work with quality third party applications covering the State and Loral Government marketplace. The solutions range from Finance, Maintenance, to Process Control. This assures our ability to add and integrate the solutions we require on one architecture. RECOMMENDATIONS Computer Automation Policy Recommendation: 1. For the reasons stated above, it is the recommendation of the Information Services Division that all future computer applications involving multiprocessors (minicomputers and main frames — not PCs) be products of the Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC). These can be supplied by the vendor (or bidder if a contractual structure is followed) or purchased directly by CSDOC, whichever is deemed most appropriate for the circumstances involved. 2. It is proposed that the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County begin its automation plan for the next 3 to 5 years by the adoption of the following network configuration: Phase 1 The installation of a dual-host minicomputer system provided by Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) on an Ethernet network backbone. This system will fully support the LIMS with network connections to all Laboratory facilities at both Plant 1 and Plant 2, together with the existing Local Area Networks for Technical Services. The hardware configuration will also 11 May 9, 1991 provide the majority of the computing hardware needed for Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) to be implemented in Phase 2. The figure of $567,000 is a net cost. A cost savings of $75,000 is realized for each application, LIMS and CMMS, by unifying the configuration into one system, instead of configuring each system separately. $567,000 plus tax; budgeted in 91-92 Phase 2 The extension of the Ethernet backbone already installed in Phase 1, together with any necessary network peripheral equipment and software. This will be in support of CMMS. This will add Operations & Maintenance LANs located at Plant 1 and Plant 2 to the Ethernet network. (The budgeted amount shown is the total for all hardware and software.) $900,000 budgeted 90-91 and rebudgeted for 91-92 Additional Phases (exact sequence is undetermined at this point): 3. Additional dual-host minicomputer system from DEC and extension of the Ethernet network to include the existing LAN in Purchasing. Nodes added to the network will include the Warehouse facilities at Plant 1 and Plant 2, as well as Finance, Accounting and Personnel. This will provide a new working platform for new application software for the following functions: A. Purchasing and Warehouse Inventory $421,000 budgeted 91-92 B. Finance, Payroll and Accounting $500,000 budgeted 91-92 (GL, AP, AR, etc.) C. LAN upgrades to conned to Ethernet $200,000 budgeted 91-92 backbone D. Network linkages to Personnel and $150,000 budgeted 91-92 other existing systems 4. Conned the computer systems provided for in Job No.s J-23-2 and P2-44 into the Ethernet backbone. Provide a software interface to enable summary data to be transferred directly from Operations process monitoring and control computers into the Administrative network. This will eliminate costly and error-prone duplicate data entry, as well as provide more accurate and timely reporting. $1,500,000 budgeted through 92-93 12 May 9, 1991 5. Full implementation of Job No. J-25 will provide a means of accessing CAD drawings on-line showing plant facilities and structures, utility lines within the plant, "as built" drawings of plant structures, electrical schematics, sewer trunk lines and feeders, as well as possible tie-ins to Orange County's GIS system. Additional modifications will be made to the network to make these resources available to all nodes of the Administrative network. Additional modifications will enable these resources to be fully utilized within the CMMS, as well as technical drawings, exploded views of machine parts, and such diverse features as video excerpts from sewer line investigative studies for Collection Facilities. (Only a small portion of this will be actual computer hardware and software) $2,500,000 budgeted through 93-94 6. The addition of the Co-generation monitoring system, the Ocean Outfall Booster System, and other diverse operating systems to the Administrative network for summary data collection. $50,000 preliminary estimate; Not yet budgeted at this time 7. Integration of the fiber-optic path made available as a result of Job No. 1-9. This will eliminate the need for the costly leased lines to communicate data between Plant 1 and Plant 2. Greater efficiency and speed of processing will be realized. $100,000 preliminary estimate; Not yet budgeted at this time 8. As the need is found, other applications can be added to the Administrative network. These include Electronic Mail, and an Executive Information System to tie together all of the data available from all of the diverse systems throughout the plant to provide top management with appropriate summary data on-line. No estimate available; Not yet budgeted at this time 9. Future technology can be introduced as the need is identified and the resources and costs are shown to be prudent. These include the integration of voice with data, the processing of FAX, image, and video data -- all on the Administrative network. No estimate available; Not yet budgeted at this time An illustration depicting the Administrative network concept is shown as Attachment F. 13 May 9, 1991 Initial Hardware Acquisition Recommendation: The Information Services Division recommends purchase of a DEC VAX 4000 model 300 dual host cluster computer system with an fiberoptic Ethernet network for a cost not to exceed $567,000 plus tax. This includes all DEC proprietary operating system software and licenses, networking hardware and service, cables, delivery, and Installation. A systems configuration is proposed that will provide redundancy, power to drive sophisticated applications, an office environment footprint (minimizing the need for sophisticated computer rooms),and file manager services for networked desktop devices. This building block for the future will be based upon DEC's latest VAX technology, utilizing systems management capabilities found only in large mainframe class VAXcluster installations. This system, as Phase 1, is intended to provide a working platform for the Laboratory Information Management System. (It will coincidentally provide most of the configuration necessary for the Computerized Maintenance Management System. At this writing, the design of the CMMS is still being finalized. Additions necessary for the CMMS will involve extending the Ethernet backbone in "Phase 2".) It is critical that Phase 1 be approved prior to or in conjunction with the LIMS to provide a working platform for the LIMS. The common VAXcluster system will provide computing capacity for both LIMS and CMMS at a cost savings of approximately $150,000 over providing individual computer systems for each application, alone. Systems Configuration - The core of the solution quoted by DEC is two VAX 4000 Model 300 Central Processing Units (CPU) combining for a total of 16 million instructions per second performance with in-cabinet upgrades available in the future, as the need arises. Each CPU is configured with 64 Megabytes of Main Memory expandable up to 128 Megabytes in each CPU. There are 3.8 Gigabytes of disk storage clustered between the two CPUs. This is expandable up to 28 Gigabytes of storage. A 296 Megabyte cartridge tape drive is utilized as the load device. A 1600 BPI Tape subsystem is also configured for Disk backup. There is a slot in the CPU cabinet to handle the new 4 millimeter tape technology, as well. A detailed list of the benefits of the VAX 4000 is shown as Attachment G. Systems Software - Both systems will run full function VAX/VMS operating systems (O/S). The VAXcluster option within the O/S will also be activated providing for powerful CPU failover. Additionally, Volume Shadowing software has been quoted to build in additional redundancy between disk drives. DECnet networking software will be installed to complete the cluster configuration to give Terminal server users and Desk devices dynamic access to information in the VAXcluster disk farm. Some of this information will be directly related to applications executing on the cluster. Additional data will be remote virtual disks activated by a variety of remote desktop devices. 14 ... May 9, 1991 Fiber Network - A 10 Megabit fiber-optic network has been designed to act as a foundation for a `campus" backbone. This approach offers the Districts excellent expansion for future considerations such as 100 Megabyte FDDI (a new fiber-optic industry-wide standard being developed). Bridging from the backbone are twisted pair Ethernet repeaters utilized to support Desktop Integration as well as Terminal Server connection to local and remote devices. Included with the network is a bridge to some of our key Novell LANs adding additional access to isolated environments. Connection to additional existing and future LANs can be easily added later. An illustration of this campus backbone for Phase 1 is shown as Attachment H. It is important to note that all existing PCs in the Laboratory will be fully utilized in the new LIMS via the fiber network. Merging of Voice and Data Technologies At the present time, Information Services Division's range of activities include telecommunications and graphics services (desktop publishing) in addition to computer hardware and software. The plan outlined in this report does not address these activities. However, the merging of voice and data technologies is becoming more prevalent in the United States and the world in general. This merging will undoubtedly become part of future plans at the Districts. The predominant implementation of this merging at the present time is Integrated Services Digital Network or ISDN. Many details have yet to be resolved with the new ISDN standard. Additionally, ISDN has not yet been implemented in our local access and transport area (GTE). Finally, ISDN offers transmission speeds far inferior to those already in use at the Districts. Therefore, it is our opinion that ISDN is not expected to yield any appreciable benefit to the Districts for at least 3 years at the earliest and probably not for 5 years. 15 PC AND CPT INVENTORY BY DIVISION / DEPARTMENT Department/Division PC Count CPT Count 2150 - General Manager 0 2 2160 - Board Secretary 0 3 2170 - Management Support 2 1 2180 - Personnel & Safety 13 0 2210 - Director of Finance 4 1 2220 - Accounting 7 0 2230 - Purchasing 5 1 2240 - Information Services 16 0 3310 - Director of Operations & Maintenance 11 0 3330 - Plant Maintenance 0 0 3340 - Collection Facilities 0 0 3350 - Mechanical Maintenance 1 0 3360 - Electrical Maintenance 0 0 3370 - Instrumentation 8 0 3380 - Operations (Plant No. 1) 4 0 3380 - Operations (Plant No. 2) 8 1 3510 - Director of Technical Services 5 0 3520 - Compliance 9 0 3530 - Conservation, Reclamation & Reuse 5 0 _ 3580 - Laboratory 18 1 3590 - Source Control 16 0 3710 - Director of Engineering 0 1 3720 - Planning & Design 9 2 3790 - Construction Management 4 3 TOTALS 145 16 Attachment A CSDOC Local Area Networks `..� PC Count Local Area Network as Technical Services 9 Compliance 12 Information Services 13 Personnel 15 Operations & Maintenance, Plant 1 8 Operations, Plant 2 9 Engineering (being installed) 5 Purchasing 115 TOTAL All other computers (30) are not networked at this time Attachment 8 Computer Industry Standards Service Relevant Standards Application Access Windowing Services X Wmdow System (endorsed by X/Open;ANSI X3113.6 in process) OSF/Motif(IEEE IM1 in process) Forms Services Form Interface Management System (ISO SC22/WG18) Terminal Services ANSI X3.64 Graphics Services ISO 7942,ANSI X3.124, ANSI X3.144 Application Control Services Emerging. Remote Procedure Call (NCS/RPC, OSF RFT, ECMA 127,ISO DIS 10148,ANSI X3T5); IEEE 1003A IEEE 1003.8 Communications Messaging Services CCI T X.400 EDI Services ANSI X12, EDIFACf Information/Resource Sharing Compound Document Services ODA/ODIF(ISO 8613) SGML(ANSI X3.143, ISO 8979) Abstract Syntax Notation (ASN.1-ANSI X3T2, ISO 8824-5) Data Access Services SOL (ISO,ANSI X3.135) Repository/Dictionary Services Emerging. Information Resource Dictionary Services (ANSI X3.138, ISO TC97) File Sharing Services Network He System (de facto; IEEE 1003.8 in process) Print Services ECMA/ISO Print Systems Interconnect PostScript (de facto) OSF/Motif is a trademark of the Open Software Foundation. X Window System is a trademark of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. ANSI is the American National Standards Institute. IEEE is the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. ISO is the International Organization for Standardization. CCITT is the International Telegraph and Telephone Consultative Committee(International Telegraph Union member). `� Attachment C SIX STAGES OF DATA PROCESSING GROWTH STAGES I If III IV V VI Growth Initiation Contagion Control Integration Data Maturity Processes Admin. Application Functional Proliferation Upgrade Retrofitting Organization Application Portfolio cost documentation existing integration integration reduction & restructure applications of "mirrors" applications existing using applications information applications Data Base Rows technology DP Specialize- User- Middle Establish Data Data Organization tion for oriented management computer administration resource technologi- programmers utility and management cal learning user account teams DP Planning fax More In Formalized Tailored Shared Data & Control planning& planning& data & resource control control common strategic systems systems planning User "Hands off" Superficially Arbitrarily Accountability Effectively Acceptance Awareness enthusiastic held learning accountable of joint accountable user and Data Processing accountability Reprinted by permission of Harvard Business Revicw. An exhibit from "Managing the Crisis in Data Processing,"by Richard L.Nolan, March/April 1979. Copyright 1979 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College; all rights reserved. Attachment D Other OSI SYSTEM Vendors RESOURCE IBM (VAX) 7 91:1 • . - MS-DOS VMS UNIX OS/2 Macintosh Terminals Attachment E OPERATIONS TECHNICAL INFORMATION & SERVICES COMPLIANCE SERVICES PERSONNEL MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING PURCHASING FS FS FS FS FS FS FS FUTURE _______ ETHERNET FIBER OPTIC BACKBONE FUTURE PHASE2 PLANT INSTRUMENTATION COLLECTION ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL MAINT FACILITIES MAINT MAINT MUX SERVER LEASED LINE (FUTURE FIBER OPTIC) LABORATORY FUTURE PLANTI VA% VAX CLUSTER CLUSTER PHASE2 OPERATIONS DEC 8 MUX MAINTENANCE PLANT Y DISK �— DISK FS FARM FARM APPLICATIONS APPLICATIONS -CMMS -GL -LIMB -AP LABORATORY -AR PLANT2 -FINANCE -PAYROLL FUTURE APPLICATIONS: -PURCHASING -Email -INVENTORY -GIS FUTURE CONNECTIONS TO: -UUllty Mapping -Plant Operations Monitoring -EIS -CoGen Operations Monitoring-Master System -County of Orange Email FS =LAN File Server Attech/m/ont F 1 1 VAX 4000 BENEFITS -CPU performance 10 time a MicroVAX II -Expansion up to 28 Gigabytes of storage - Expansion up to 128 Megabytes of memory - RISC processors embedded in the DSSI disk adapters & Ethernet adapter, greatly enhancing throughput - Overall performance in excess of VAX 6000-410 - Robust VMS operating system and industry leading standards based networking technology with DECnet. FUTURE DIRECTIONS The VAX 4000 system is configured today to take advantage of tomorrow's expansion technology. For example, when 4-Megabyte DRAMS become economically available, the VAX 4000 will be ready to expand out to 512 Megabytes. When a faster CMOS-baud VAX CPU is made available,the VAX 4000 will be able to swap out CPU's for higher performance alternatives. DUAL HOST CLUSTER BENEFITS - Volume Shadowing - Digital's Volume Shadowing phase U software provides even more data availability by duplicating multiple copies on up to three disks of the same size in a dual host configuration. These copies are called a'shadow set'. If the disk,the media,or the controller used to access a member within the shadow set fails, disk 1/0 continues on the remaining members of the shadow set without any interruption. The failed unit can then be isolated and repaired while other units in the shadow set continue. - Fallover- As multi-user systems -When timesharing terminals are attached to dual-hosted systems by v terminal servers, users logged on to a system that fails can simply log on to the other systems to continue. The same is we for Pathworks integrated Personal Computers accessing the system as timesharing terminals or as a Personal Computer utilizing a virtual disk. Summary - Failover when the application is running on the Satellite node - Higher availability to data for satellites and timesharing users -Ability to run any VMS application - Growth path from a single VAX 4000-300 - Future upgrades and enhancements - Configuration can act as a Server,Timesharing, and Batch engine. Attachment G DEC MUX �NOVELL MUX SERVER F.O.T. F.O.T. VI'•� I PLANT N0. 2 PB �� ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION 024 PHASE 1 24 FIBER Z::— FIBER BACKBONE MICRO TRAILER El PB LAB ADMINISTRATION IDF CLOSET 24 FIBER WIC F.O.7.� 012 F.O.T. DETPR - if 12 FIBER = F.O.T. DETPR = 2 FIBER JUMPER WIC = r024 W UTP STAR PATCH J PANEL LO.T.I [F.I.T_I .-12 FIBER 1CAX LED OFFICE TRAILER SPLICE ENCLOSURE A' 'hmort 11 s COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA May 21, 1991 IOW ELLIS AVENUE oo.Box 8127 SUPPLEMENTAL STAFF REPORT POONTAIN VAULM CALIFORNIA 927284127 (RE: PROPOSED MINICOMPUTER HARDWARE SYSTEM AND NETWORK) "14les24A++ LIMS/CMMS MINICOMPUTER SYSTEM CORRELATION WITH ENGINEERING CAD SYSTEM INTRODUCTION During the May 15th meeting of the Fiscal Policy Committee, a question was raised as to the capacity and capability of the minicomputer system proposed for the implementation of the Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) and the Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS). Specifically, the question related to the design work currently proceeding by the Engineering Department for Job No. J-25, "Computerized Facilities' Records and Drawing System and Power Studies", and its relation to Computerized Maintenance Management System. The Engineering Department presently has an 8 node Local Area Network (LAN) of PCs. These PCs run a variety of applications, including the product AutoCAD. Some confusion may have occurred during the meeting of May 15, 1991 in relation to this system. This is not the system that would meet the needs being investigated for Job No. J-25. AutoCAD is the most heavily used Computer Aided Drafting (CAD) product on personal computers but it does not meet the needs that are being addressed by this project. It will , however, also be added to the Ethernet network so that data can be shared between systems and applications. CMMS is not an extension of CAD nor vice versa. They are separate and distinct products with different purposes. A good CMMS can be made better by the ability to link its database contents with digital drawings and geo-based maps within a CAD system. However, such functionality and connectivity are not dependent upon both applications running within the same CPU. One of the most important features of the proposed Minicomputer Hardware System and Network is, in fact, the network. This high-speed Ethernet network will facilitate the transmission of the above-mentioned documents to wherever they are needed throughout the network. The device in question may be a PC residing on a LAN running with Novell Netware. The CAD product to address the needs of Job No. J-25 has not been chosen and will not be for some time. Absolute assurance that such a system will run on the VAX computer being proposed for the LIMS and CMMS cannot be given, but may not be necessary for the reasons stated above and further clarified in the detailed report which follows. CLARIFICATION OF TERMS The original question can best be answered by elaborating on the various applications. The purpose of this report is to: 1. Clarify terms and definitions for Computerized Maintenance Management Systems (CMMS) -- what it is and what it is not. �,/ 1 May 21, 1991 2. Clarify terms and definitions related to Computer Aided Design and �✓ Drafting (CAD). 3. Clarify the scope of Job No. J-25 as it is at this writing. 4. Introduce a new term, Image Processing, and how it relates to all three topics. 5. Finally, the question of integrating the proposed minicomputer system for LIMS and CMMS with CAD will be addressed. 1. COMPUTERIZED MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS Briefly, a CMMS is intended to automate the critical record keeping tasks related to the maintenance and repair of equipment associated with the wastewater treatment process at the Districts. A CMMS facilitates Work Order Processing in all of its myriad applications. Such Work Orders can involve Preventive Maintenance, Repair, Scheduled Maintenance, Emergency Work Orders, and many others. The record keeping function also involves the compilation and cross- referencing of historical data related to repair and maintenance on each and every traceable part and component. In this manner, detailed records can be used to document the performance of different makes and models of equipment, pumps, valves, and other components to guide the Districts in future planning, repairs and purchases. Compliance with manufacturers' recommended maintenance schedules _ can also be facilitated. These are the prime functions of a CMMS. All other features that are desired are only helpful attachments but should not diminish the importance of the previously stated functions. A more complete description of the goals and features of the specific CMMS being proposed by the Districts' Maintenance Department will be forthcoming in a separate report. The purpose of this report is merely to clarify what has been and is being studied as a CMMS to differentiate it from the other issues raised in the meeting. Not many CMMS possess the ability to link database elements with digital maps or CAD drawings (terms clarified in the next section) . However, some do exist. It is such a system that will be brought to the Board for approval to purchase. However, it should be understood that NO CAD product has CMMS as an integral part of itself. CMMS is a separate and distinct product which can be designed to work "with" (not "within") a CAD product. 2. COMPUTER AIDED DRAFTING (CAD) Computer Aided Design and Drafting (CADD) is the formal generic term which has most often been shorted to the acronym "CAD", which is used in this report. Often it is erroneously used synonymously with a specific product known as AutoCAD. AutoCAD is a trademarked product of AutoDesk, Incorporated. It is the major PC-based CAD product in the marketplace, and is used by the Districts and our consulting engineers. However, it is not the only product on the market and should not be confused with the generic term. 2 �,./ May 21, 1991 CAD systems are normally associated with automated drafting of architectural drawings for physical structures, flow diagrams of processes, schematic illustrations, and detailed engineering drawings related to civil , mechanical , electrical and other engineering specialties. However, although generic CAD products once sought to cover all of these applications, large users of CAD systems (including major engineering firms) have recognized that no one CAD product can adequately cover all "bases" without special add-on packages or additional software and hardware. Consequently, it is important that any enterprise which intends to adopt CAD resources carefully study the exact nature of their needs and focus on those products and services which will best meet those needs. That is precisely what the Districts' Engineering Department staff is doing at this time for Job No. J-25. CAD, at present, is a very broad term covering many functions which have acquired their own definitions to further distinguish their uniqueness. One such term is "geo-based systems", also referred to as "Computer Mapping", "Geographic Information Systems (GIS)", and other such terms. These systems, although they originally grew from the common source of CAD systems, have now specialized and are unique in their ability to electronically represent spatial and topographical relationships. It is such a system that is being investigated for use in Job No. J-25. One of the two largest vendors in geo-based systems is ESRI of Redlands, California and their product is known as ArcInfo. This product is well suited to the Utility Mapping portion of the Job No. J-25. Staff's investigation of `./ ArcInfo has revealed that this product will run very well on many platforms including the dual host VAX cluster proposed for LIMS and CMMS. This also includes full compliance with IEEE 802.3 standards (Ethernet) . However, experience has shown that geo-based systems (like Arc Info) work best on their own stand-alone CAD-type workstations, centering the computing power in the workstation itself, not in a minicomputer. A minicomputer (or mainframe, if one is used) serves a better purpose as a greatly expanded file server and a driver for a wide area network for the porting of geo-based data to less sophisticated computers and workstations. ArcInfo, if selected, will work well on the proposed Ethernet network. However, it is not planned to host the actual operation of ArcInfo on a VAX. The other of the two largest vendors in geo-based systems is Intergraph. Their product is fully compliant with IEEE 802.3 standards (Ethernet) and the digital maps produced by their product would be able to be transmitted over the Ethernet network proposed for the LIMS and CMMS systems. However, Intergraph will not run on a DEC VAX, IBM or any other major computer manufacturer's platform. Their product will only run on their own proprietary equipment which is custom-made for running Intergraph. This is not necessarily seen as a disadvantage since, as stated above, geo-based systems are usually run on stand-alone workstations that, at most, are only connected to other computers to facilitate file storage/retrieval and networking. However, this product's unique isolation from standard computer products does cause staff to view this choice with caution. \.a 3 May 21, 1991 Although AutoCAD possesses the ability to draw maps, it does not enjoy the richness of features that are unique to the two products mentioned above. These features are specific to geo-based systems and include the enhanced ability to link foreign databases to discrete points on a digital map. 3. JOB NO. J-25, COMPUTERIZED FACILITIES' RECORDS AND DRAWING SYSTEM AND POWER STUDIES. The purpose of this project is to provide a Facility Atlas for CSDOC of both plants and a geo-based map of the Districts' collection system. This project will be a considerable undertaking and will involve two separate tasks. The Scope of Work, dated April 17, 1991, describes this as follows: "The first task will be to initiate a plan and work with the District staff to develop a computer generated master set of facility drawings of Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley, Treatment Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach and all interconnecting utilities to show all plant processes, utilities, and structures. The second task will be to implement a facilities mapping, land use mapping and hydraulic modeling computer system portraying the Districts service area of Orange County.. ." Information Services has been working closely with the staff of the Engineering Department to assure that whatever systems are identified as the best to accomplish the above will be compatible with other existing or proposed systems at the Districts. As described in the section on CAD systems above, the systems which will best meet the needs of Job No. J-25 will not necessarily be best suited to run on an IBM, DEC VAX or any other standard platform. As far as the needs of a CMMS are concerned, the only real importance is that the drawing, illustration or map be available to the CMMS user when they need it and where they need it. The Minicomputer Hardware System and Network requested for the LIMS and CMMS will be able to accomplish this. 4. IMAGE PROCESSING A common denominator to the entire issue is represented by the concept of "images". Simply put, geo-based (or GIS) systems are used to create automated maps. CAD systems create drawings. Scanned images constitute a third type of electronic data that can be used to show maps or drawings. These scanned images can be maps, drawings, illustrations, photographs or virtually any two- dimensional object that is placed upon the glass plate of a scanning machine and "scanned" in a similar fashion to what a photocopy machine does to a document to make copies. However, instead of printing a copy, a scanning device captures the electronic "image" to allow it to be filed, stored, displayed, manipulated, indexed, or printed. The point of this discussion is the similarity of these three types of images -- geo-based, CAD and scanned. All of these applications produce an "image", in a generic sense. The system that is proposed for LIMS/CMMS supports the full use of all three types of images over the entire network. Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) 4 `a.r� May 21, 1991 `✓ terms this as Network Application Support (NAS) . Numerous leading imaging companies are fully compliant with the NAS standard, including ABB and Excalibur. Similarly, most leading companies with geo-based products and CAD products are also NAS compliant. This includes companies such as ESRI (ArcInfo), AutoCAD, McDonnell-Douglas, AutoTrol, and Synercom. This means that as long as the CMMS is also NAS compliant, it can integrate any CAD, geo-based or scanned images into its functions so that, to the user, it would not matter whether the CMMS seemed to be a "part" of the geo-based systems or CAD system or vice versa. As long as the data can be transparently shared between applications, the functionality is maximized to the fullest. S. INTEGRATING COMPUTER SYSTEMS FOR LIMS, CMMS AND CAD. Will the CAD system run on the VAX being requested for LIMS/CMMS? If "CAD" is meant to infer the system which will eventually be proposed for Job No. J-25, then the answer is "Probably not, but it shouldn't matter." Will the CMMS provide the ability to call up exploded-view drawings of pumps and other equipment, as well as maps of the facilities showing location of the same? The answer to this vital question is "Yes, that is what we will submit for approval . The system will have the ability to retrieve this data from the CAD system, based on the information we have so far." The last question would be "Will the CAD system chosen for Job No. J-25 provide these drawings and maps and will this hardware system provide a means for these to be called up by the CMMS?" The answer for this question will also be "Yes". All products being considered have a compatible format for use by the CMMS software which will be proposed and, more importantly, the CAD systems will be able to utilize the high-speed Ethernet network to get the drawings or maps where they need to be, when they are needed. `/ 5 G Jim LIMS-GOOD REGULATIONS PARTNER The Safe Drinking Water Act(SDWA) LIMS manages large amounts of test variances and exemptions—and what Amendments have removed any linger- dam quickly and reliably. With Capabil- it all means for their City. ing hope that providing dean,safe ities including statistics,graphics and SDWA Has Broad Impact drinking water will be inexpensive or word processing,LIMS provides: Key responsibilities of the Amendments easy.Capital expenditures for water ■Sample cracking include: treatment needed to comply with SDWA AN Instrument scheduling and analysis ■Filtration of surface water is estimated anywhere from$535 mil. assignment ■Disinfection of all public wafer lion to billion per year during the ■Automatic dam envy from supplies 199f1s. Recent estimates from EPA indi- instruments ■Ban on lead pipes,solder and flux Cate that Phase D rule Compliance Costs ■Sample results reports ■Public notice when systems violate alone will be$88 million. ■Backlog reports and ad hoc reports smndards Congress and the EPA have aggres- ■QA/QC control ■Best Available Technology(BAT)for sively tackled increased regulation of SDWA Overview drinking water—responding to the each regulation Contaminant The 1986 SD\VA Amendments includes public's demand for no-risk drinking What Is Best Anmilable Technology? water—with a short time frame. Water tales on Volatile Organic Chemicals, The U.S. EPA is specifying the Surface Water Treatment, Tom] utilities are facing major challenges to Coliform, Inorganic Chemicals, technology or ue amen techniques improve their treatment facilities, install Synthetic Organic Chemicals Pesticides recommended for each Maximum , new technologies or both. Contaminant Level(MCL). It is not (Phase II),Lead,Copper and Corrosion mandator that the suggested method LIMS Evens Up Odds Against Control and Radionuclides. y Regulations As portions of the SDWA become be used;any "appropriate technology" A Laboratory Information Management effective(Table 1),day-today operations that is acceptable to the state and System(LIMS)meets the efficiency for water treatment plants will change results in compliance with the MCL challenge head-ran by providing the substantially. City Water Departments is satisfacrory. tools necessary in keep up with SDWA are scrambling for an understandable Latest Actions and other regulations. LIMS is a interpretation of this regulation—ifs To-dare,60 contaminants have Federally Computer system which collects,stores numerous phases,changing dates, enforceable standards. Michael Cook, \� and analyzes laboratory dam(Figure 1). raw UMS Computer SWaa' (Mipo w Mini) PC Wa tnons NCM1WBI SWaW (]II 011 011 III 011 DI abe Pnnter Repots Prirrter tAW Area NaMnrk E:1I [I ® Invnneat Servers eseo e s une To instruments 00er Compmers Fgtor I. LL1IS uses a computer for data acquisition,pmrewott, t el dissemination. 9 I Director of U.S. EPAs Office of TABLE 1 Drinking Water,estimates that by the SDWA DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE year 2000 there will be standards for Rule Statue Effective 185 contaminants. FlYorida Final 10/87 The latest phase of the regulations Lead Ban(SDWA 1417) Final alas was promulgated on December 31,1990. Phase I Valatlle Organics Phil 1189 The Phase II synthetic organic and Public Notiflcalm Phil 4189 inorganic chemicals Rule Covers 27 Surface We1st TreaMent Rule Fire! 12/90 additional contaminants,which become Total Custom Rule Fruit 12190 effective July 1992. It also proposes LeadlCopper 1991 Phase II 100s and SOCs Pro�possed 1992 revised standards for five conmminants. Phase III Radbnuctides To be proposed 1993 Approximately 3,3M of the cou ays Phase N Disinfection To be proposed 1994 80,000 water systems will have w treat I Phase V IOCs end S(K5 Proposed 1992 their water to Control one or more of the Notes:All dates alter December 1990 era tunnelled Phase II contaminants according to the I Some effective deals ere pulsed In by system size. U.S.EPA. LIMS Is Means to An End customer Complaint samples ran be Surface water veavnent and total quickly and accurately referenced when coliform rules became effective LIMS Minimizes Labor Costs December 31, 1990.Surface water The biggest problem Moore sees for labs a customer calls.An additional related veamnent regulations cover filtration, without LIMS is the difficulty of benefit of an automated laboratory is disinfection,turbidity,Giardia lumblia, reacting to situations;accumulating meeting the EPA requirement that data viruses,Legionefla and heterotrophic information rather than assessing it. be kept for ten years.Test results are bacteria. That's why she anticipates that when easily and Compactly scored on The more challenging of the two may their new lab is built some time within magnetic ups. be the total Coliform requirements with the next year, they will instill LIMS. Planning is Practical Benefit repetitive sampling requirements based The current lab will be unable to mat Joe Glicker,Water Quality Director, on system sire. For example,systems their needs and keep up with processing Portland Water Bureau,thinks that analyzing less than 40 samples per due to number of team required,quality LIMS'primary benefit is the ability to month can have no more than one control,and mandated test methods. help plan for future regulations.For positive sample per month.There are LIMS should make it unnecessary to example,Glicker bas tried out the also specific public notices that must be hire three or four more people. different limits proposed by U.S. EPA made if standards aren t met. Report Generation Another Key Benefit for lead.It helps determine if it will mean buying new equipment and how Compliance Won't it Cheap h Elisabeth Central Ocin Lab Supervisor for ion P What forced effect will this have on South Crshtral Connecticut Regional the location of the ample affects the consumers'pocket books?It's anyone's Weser Authority in New Hawn, results.Glicker says it's also much easier guess.Wade Miller,Executive Director, Connecticut,has worked with a LIMS to manipulate dam,organize historical Association of State Drinking Water since 1987.The latest SDWA regulations dam,rack repeat samples and flag Administrators,made an observation. have required only a few modifications potential problems. "Everyone's water rates will at least to the programs to change detection LIMS is Key to Regulation Survival double over the next five years. And,if limits.With reports on 150,000 results As utilities across the Country begin to the water needs to be sealed for three or every year,Pahmba says that the main encounter affects of the SDWA four contaminants,costs could easily benefit is each sample is logged in only regulations,many are turning to triple. But,there are so many once and then tracked throughout the automation as they plan how to meet contributing factors—each water system process.By entering sample number, monitoring and reporting requirements. is site-spedfic,"Miller explained. she can gel all the information she now who have already automated Jean Moore,FL Wayne,Indiana's needs. their laboratories are reaping greater Water Resources Assistant Director of Washington Suburban Sanitary overall efficiency including significantly Research and Development,agreed Commission(WSSC)Laboratory faster report preparation with less saying, "There are so many variables, Director for the Water Operations paperwork, improved turnaround time, from amount of lab equipment already Division,Brad Fisher,agrees that ease of sample tracking and archiving, owned, to site of the plant,to foresight generation of the monthly reporm for improved customer response time,and of City staff to stay on top of new the Suite of Maryland and management enhanced planning to determine the regulations:'Moore says that FL of 2,000 team per month is much easier impact of upcoming regulations. Wayne's recent 20.4%water rate increase with LIMS. Dam is fed directly from Facing the certainly of more and was well accepted.She credits this to a insnitmenm to the LIMS,eliminating more stringent regulations and limited year-long publicity program which the chance of human error. resources to Comply with them,LIMS is educated the public and invited them to Fisher is currently trying to get the a proven technology that makes the tour the plant. Unfortunately,many State to accept the reports electronically. formidable information management other cities are not going to be in this This would help both WSSC and the task tolerable. position when it becomes necessary to State since dam is reentered at State For more information about LIMS or seek significant rate increases to comply offices. information services,please check the with regulations. One customer service benefit is that appropriate box on the reader reply 10 card. 0 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS at ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 10114 ELLIS AVENUE 00.BOX S127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALFORNIA 92728.8127 01A1982-2a11 May 9, 1991 STAFF REPORT REQUEST FOR THE PURCHASE OF LABORATORY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (LIMS) SOFTWARE SUMMARY The Laboratory Division is proposing purchase of a Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS). The Laboratory sample analysis workload has increased to the point that non-automated data management is inefficient and threatens the security and defendability of the results generated by the Laboratory. To provide for a more productive and efficient data management system and to ensure the integrity of the analytical results, the Laboratory Division is proposing LIMS software utilizing a relational database technology and fourth generation Structured Query Language from VG Fisons. The hardware portion of this system is described in the May 9, 1991 Staff Report by the Information Services Division. The hardware costs for the LIMS is $358,500 plus tax and delivery. The software costs for the LIMS is $249,600 plus tax. The total price of the system is $608,100 plus tax and delivery. The productivity cost savings are estimated to be $190,136 per year. This provides a payback period of approximately 3.2 years. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The Laboratory uses a wide variety of computer spreadsheets, computer databases, hand written spreadsheets and written forms. This requires multiple manual entry of the same data to perform calculations, analyses, and other data reduction functions. The Laboratory does not have a centralized electronic database system which is capable of performing the required functions for sample tracking and data management. Currently, the Laboratory logs in and tracks samples using handwritten notebooks. Each section of the Laboratory maintains a number of different notebooks which are based on the different types of samples (i.e. industrial source control, influent and effluent wastewater, sludge, and marine water) received for analysis. Because this is a manual system, the information on each sample must be entered by hand multiple times during the analysis process. This is a time consuming and redundant process that increases record keeping errors and does not provide the capability to track and status samples quickly and efficiently but does provide an opportunity for errors to enter the process. 1 The number of samples that the Laboratory receives has increased to a point that manually maintaining the sample tracking records poses a threat to the integrity of the sample's chain of custody. This represents a very real potential for problems which could severely affect the ability of the Laboratory to report results for permit compliance and could result in the loss of litigation regarding industrial source control samples. The lack of an automated system to manage the results of these analyses efficiently introduces a high-risk-potential for the loss of data and leads to extended delays in reporting sample results. The consequences for the loss of analytical data for a sample are extensive. For example, the loss of data for a source control sample would require a source control inspector to return to the industrial source stream and collect another 24-hour composite sample. The sample would then be analyzed again by the Laboratory. In addition to the cost and time required for resampling and reanalysis, it is possible to compromise the outcome of an enforcement action due to the Laboratory's inability to provide adequate sample handling techniques. Problems in adequate data management may also affect the ability to adequately monitor requirements to demonstrate compliance with the Districts' NPDES permit requirements. Because a single sample may require analysis by a number of different Sections of the Laboratory or at a contract laboratory, assembling all of the test results requires manual re-entry of the data into the report format. These independent and separate systems make it difficult to validate all of the various test results and associated quality control requirements for a sample and summarize them into the final report. Delays in reporting data can be attributed to the time required for calculation and validation of the results of the analyses. The ability to meet the report deadlines established by the Districts' discharge permit is being severely jeopardized by the synergistic effects of the expanding workload, the number of analyses, and the outdated procedures currently utilized for the calculation, validation and reporting of data. The impact of the backlog of results is further compounded because many other Divisions rely on this data for report generation, decision making, plant operation and regulation of industrial discharge permitees. The Districts rely on contract laboratories to perform some analyses. Similar to the in- house analyses process,the sample chain-of-custody reports for samples shipped to the contract laboratories are maintained in bound notebooks. The lack of a central database requires that all data generated by these laboratories be manually reviewed, validated, and transcribed into the Districts' report format by senior members of the laboratory staff. This practice is labor intensive and provides additional sources for data entry errors. The LIMS would provide a means to transfer data electronically from the contract laboratories to the Districts' LIMS database. Having all Laboratory data in a centralized electronic database is recommended by a number of regulatory agencies such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2 Multiple locations of data within the Laboratory affect data handling and reporting practices throughout the Districts. Currently, a printout of a Laboratory data file is sent to and users of the data in other Divisions. After distribution of the printed data, other Divisions that received the printed report have to manually reenter the data into their own report format. This practice is inefficient and provides another source for data entry errors to occur. Once data in the LIMS database has been verged for use, it will be available to all approved users, eliminating the need for them to key the data for a second time. Reports will be generated utilizing automated report writing routines contained in the LIMS. The Laboratory is rapidly introducing state-of-the-art analytical instrumentation that can perform analyses much more efficiently and effectively with higher levels of accuracy and precision at ultra low concentrations (part-per-billion and part-per-trillion). The mode of data acquisition from this latest generation of instruments is controlled by computer software. By using the LIMS/instrumentation interfaces, it will be possible to transfer raw data from the instrumentation directly into the LIMS database. From that location, the automated data handling routines specific to the type of analytical data will be performed by the LIMS. In summary, the purchase of a Laboratory Information Management System will provide an efficient means to log-in, track, and determine the status of samples, and to effectively manage and report information. BENEFITS OBTAINED FROM THE LIMS Sample Log-in and Tracking: The sample log-in feature of the LIMS will allow the Laboratory to build a custom log-in procedure for all sample types. Customized analysis request menus will also be available.This will assure that all necessary sample information is recorded before the sample is distributed for analysis. The log-in process performs cross checks for the accuracy of the provided sample information. This ensures that all of the critical information associated with a sample is provided at the sample log-in step. During both manual and automatic log-in, the LIMS assigns a unique lab number to each sample and subsample. These numbers are used for rapid sample identification throughout the analysis cycle of the sample in the Laboratory. Additional efficiency and accuracy is provided by using barcode identification of the samples. During log-in, barcode labels of the sample ID number are generated and applied to all sample containers and laboratory work sheets. Another benefit of using barcode is the barcode/LIMS interface. This capability will further diminish errors in reporting and provide a cost effective means to apply automated data acquisition techniques to non computer driven Laboratory instruments. 3 After the sample is logged-in, subsamples are issued to various Sections of the Laboratory as indicated by the analysis required list. The LIMS will determine which subsamples are to be analyzed in-house and which will be sent to a contract laboratory. The sample tracking feature of the LIMS provides electronic evidence of the chain of custody. Chain of custody can become a critical issue during any type of legal matter regarding the sample results. Sample tracking also will alert the staff when a sample is reaching the end of its holding time for a particular analysis. This function of sample tracking provides for additional records of sample integrity. Besides tighter sample integrity, sample tracking reports can be issued to indicate if any backlogs of samples awaiting analysis exist or if delays in the reporting of data occur. Backlog reports will be automatically produced and ready for Laboratory management. This data will be employed to optimize scheduling of staff and instrumentation. It also will be a tool for long term budget planning of capital equipment and projecting future staffing requirements. Entry of Results into the Database: The LIMS will accommodate both manual and automatic entry of results. Routines can be written that will allow calculations to be performed on raw data to yield a result. This provision will aid in limiting the number of human errors associated with data calculation. Review of the worklist versus the result lists will guarantee that all the requested work has been accomplished. Warning flags can be established to alert staff of any result that does not comply with a set of predetermined specifications or statistical process control limits. Appropriate action will be taken based an this early warning system. Connectivity to the Analytical Instrumentation: The LIMS will allow direct communication with any Laboratory instrumentation which is capable of transmitting a signal. The workstations of the advanced analysis instrumentation will be interfaced with the LIMS. Automatic data entry will provide more efficient use of staff time by eliminating the time required for manual data entry. Automation will remove the potential for the human errors associated with data entry. This will contribute to limiting the number of revisions to the database due to incorrectly entered data. LIMS Security,Audit Trail,and Multiple Data Verification Routines:The LIMS software will enhance data integrity by providing multiple levels of user access to the database. Through user ID's and passwords, data access and management will be controlled for all users of the LIMS. These restrictions are required to ensure the security of the system. This is a critical concern to regulatory agencies. Multiple security levels will prevent unauthorized modifications to the database. A LIMS audit trail further augments data security. An audit trail provides a means to trace the history of the data set. User security levels will limit access to the audit trail portion of the database. The audit Vail also audits its own configuration by maintaining a record of when it is interrupted or prompted and the specific reason for the action. 4 `-' The Laboratory produces data requiring different levels of approval prior to release. The LIMS will provide various data verification routines to be assigned depending on the origin of the data. During validation, a member of the Laboratory staff, with the proper security level, will perform a set of predetermined tasks to verify the validity of the results. If all validation criteria are met during the review, they will be passed to the database containing verified data. Once the data have been verified, they will be available for utilization by all approved system users and report formats. Automated data transfer to other databases also will be performed after successful completion of the automated validation routines. In addition,various combinations of manual and automated validation can be applied to the data. Most of the data reported by the Laboratory will utilize this method of approval. The various validation schemes provide an efficient means to guarantee the quality of the data generated by the Laboratory. Quality Control Software: The LIMS will automatically perform statistical quality control calculations and graphics that are now performed manually by the Laboratory staff. These calculations determine the ultimate fate of the results. If the data do not successfully satisfy the established quality control parameters, they are not released for use. The statistical control software also will allow automated trending of data and graphical/statistical analysis of the data. Automation of this vital but time consuming task will provide a higher degree of sample integrity and will allow the utilization of staff members for other analytical duties. The software also will increase quality by utilizing real-time graphical displays of the data in several formats. Report Generation Software: One of the primary goals of analyses is to provide information. This task cannot be accomplished without a means to report the data in a concise fashion. The LIMS will provide the tools to report verified data in several manners. The LIMS report generator software will be employed to produce the majority of the custom reports. Versatility of report publication will be a powerful feature of the LIMS that will assist all users of the system. Another feature will be the ability to produce reports during off hours. This will allow utilization of the computer processing power for analytical purposes. Off-hour report generation will allow the printers within the Laboratory to be utilized for generation of charts, graphs and preliminary analytical reports necessary for data reduction and validation. Automated Transfer of Data to Other Districts' Systems: Through the use of the Process Lab Analysis Solution System (PLASS) software, information can be shared between systems. This will provide automated real time data transfer from the Laboratory computer to any other system in the Districts that is utilizing the Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) communication protocol. This configuration will also be used for automated sample requests. Sample requests can also be electronically transferred from another system to the LIMS. Because the LIMS will have prior knowledge of the sample's arrival, the analysis can be scheduled before the physical receipt of the sample. This also will provide an electronic record of the sample's chain of custody during transport to the Laboratory. 5 User-triendliness: The LIMS will provide accessibility to the software functions via menu driven prompts. These are very effective and require minimal training for all users of the routine LIMS functions. Through these customized menus, users can readily operate the LIMS in a manner tailored to their individual needs at their prescribed security levels. Additional assistance will be furnished by on-line help menus. Central Database: As opposed to the current multiple locations and formats of the sample tracking information and analysis results, the LIMS will store all information in a single location. Storage of information in this fashion maximizes the potential to store, search, review, verify, analyze, and report data. Ad hoc reporting is a powerful feature of LIMS software. With the relational database's SOL, an unlimited variety of data searching strategies can be performed. SOL allows the LIMS user to devise rapid search criteria and report generation formats without the need to understand complicated database programming. In order to continually provide the ability to quickly and efficiently manage data from the active database, data which is no longer being utilized can be moved to the historical portion of the database. Data located in the historical database can be quickly transferred to the active database if required. At a point in time when the data will no longer be required for any near-term reporting requirements, it can be transferred to magnetic tape for long term storage that conforms to the Districts' record storage policy using the archive function of the LIMS system. LIMS SOFTWARE SELECTION The selection of the VG Fisons LIMS software system is based on the following criteria: 1. The Laboratory has been reviewing LIMS produced by different manufacturers for the last two years. From this review, the Laboratory recognizes the need to purchase a LIMS from a manufacturer that has been a major supplier of systems for at least five years. In terms of continual and future support of the system, the LIMS should be purchased from a manufacturer who will be in the LIMS business for the next ten year period. This led to an assessment of the current market share. This evaluation indicates that four LIMS suppliers (Perkin Elmer/Nelson Systems, Inc.; VG Fisons, Ltd.; Hewlett-Packard Company; and Beckman Instruments) account for over 90 percent of all current sales. VG Fisons has the largest market share with over 50 percent of all current sales. The reasons these companies dominate the market are: they are all major laboratory instrument manufacturers and know LIMS/Instrument interface technology, laboratory sample and data handling requirements, and understand the laboratory analysis process from initial sample receiving to final report generation. 6 2. Both Information Services and the Laboratory believe that it is essential that the LIMS software utilize a relational, nonproprietary database. This ensures flexibility in the LIMS database design and allows unrestricted future growth of the system. This also optimizes the ability to take advantage of third-party software support. These requirements limit the selection to Perkin Elmer/Nelson and VG Fisons. 3. Because Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) hardware has been determined to be the best standard platform for all high-level computer systems interactions, it is critical that the LIMS supplier have an in-depth knowledge and working relationship with DEC. Only Perkin Elmer/Nelson Systems and VG Fisons are Corporate Marketing Partners (CMP) with DEC. This is a formal business agreement between DEC and the CMP which provides a means for joint research by DEC and the LIMS manufacturer. The CMP agreement also allows for joint selling of the DEC/LIMS product line and joint market ventures. 4. The VG Fisons quote is for licensing of 20 simultaneous users. The Perkin Elmer/Nelson quote is for 15 simultaneous users. Advantage: VG Fisons 5. VG Fisons LIMS has been in the field for a number of years and has gone through many iterations. The Perkin Elmer/Nelson system is a newer system. Features such as the audit trail and ad hoc reporting are recent additions to the Perkin Elmer/Nelson software and do not have a long history of use in the field. Advantage: VG Fisons 6. The initial cost for Perkin Elmer/Nelson to interface three smart (computer controlled) non-chromatographic instruments is $15,900. Interfacing of these instruments by VG Fisons would be $3,600. During the initial interface installations, the VG Fisons analysts will instruct Laboratory personnel in this procedure. This will allow installation of the interface to be performed in-house. Staff believes that VG Fisons LIMS possesses a superior and less costly mode of instrument interfacing. Advantage: VG Fisons 7. VG Fisons LIMS provides for context sensitive help. This is a time saving device and limits help information to be specific to the operation that is being performed. Advantage: VG Fisons 7 8. The total quoted cost for the VG Fisons system software is $249,600 and the quoted cost for the Perkin Elmer/Nelson system software is $310,600. The VG Fisons system is $61,000 less than the price of the Perkin Elmer/Nelson system. The two systems require slightly different hardware configurations. The configuration for VG Fisons provides additional cost savings. Advantage: VG Fisons 9. The first year support services costs are included in the price of the VG Fisons LIMS software price. Perkin Elmer/Nelson cost for these warranties is $25,000. Advantage: VG Fisons 10. Each system operates using a different database management system. VG Fisons LIMS uses Rdb and Perkin Elmer/Nelson uses Oracle. After reviewing performance reports of the two database management systems, Staff believes that Rdb outperforms Oracle. Performance coupled with the other issues listed indicate that the VG Fisons LIMS better suits the requirements of the Districts. Performance superiority of Rdb is based on the following characteristics: a. Rdb has been rated as the only database management system which offers full support for clustering in the DEC VAX environment. b. The pricing structure for Rdb is lower. The costs associated with annual maintenance and updates will be lower. This is a factor when considering the long lifetime of the system. c. Rdb was rated as the most suited of sic tested databases, including Oracle, to handle high volume transaction processing applications with over 30 users. d. The ability to store rules and procedures in the database is a powerful aid to productivity that a database management system can provide. The functionality of Rdb is rated very high. Oracle is rated very low in this capability. e. Oracle consumes a considerable amount of the central processing unit. Much of this usage comes from extensive memory searches and conversions between host hardware datatypes and the Oracle datatypes. In systems where arithmetic operations are common and complex, this factor can degrade performance by an order of magnitude. Advantage: VG Fisons 11. Through the use of their "Browse` and "Hot-key" functions, VG Fisons offers more flexibility to the user. Advantage: VG Fisons 8 COST SAVINGS ANALYSIS AND PAYBACK The primary benefits of a LIMS are in the ability to track samples, ensure their integrity, and manage data more quickly and effectively with a very high level of system security. However, the LIMS can also provide substantial cost savings in the area of increased productivity. A detailed cost saving analysis associated with increased productivity appears in Attachment 1: Cost Savings Analysis and Payback. From this analysis, the Laboratory will gain an estimated $190,136 a year in productivity. The hardware costs for the LIMS is $358,500 plus tax and delivery and the software costs is $249,600 plus tax. The total LIMS system price is $608,100 plus tax and delivery. The payback period, for this system, will be approximately 3.2 years based on the current number of samples and data handling methods used by the Laboratory. As the Laboratory expands into new technologies (i.e., Virology and Air Analysis), adds to its sampling requirements, and modernizes Its instrumental capabilities to meet the Districts' needs, these costs savings will rapidly increase, and the payback period will be actually less than 3.2 years. RECOMMENDATION For the reasons described above, staff recommends the purchase of Laboratory Information Management System software from VG Fisons for a total of$249,600 plus tax. 9 Attachment 1 Cost Savings Analysis and Payback Attachment 1 : Cost Savings Analysis and Payback o. Old Method New Method Subtotalota Task of Cost Cost Cost Analyses Time, Labor Outside Final Time, Labor Outside Final Savings,$ Savings,$ Savings,$ Payback, Per Year Hrs. Rate Costs,$ Costs,$ Hrs. Rate Costs,$ Costs,$ Per Year Per Year Per Year Years Organics UIJIMUZ Analyses Analyze sample Login Laboratory - ogin Urganic Log i in-wor s eet Questionable sample nter name Write response factor rite in bound book Calculation oo Verification of data ing l Attachment 1 : Cost Savings Analysis and Payback (Continued) o. Old Me hod New Method Subtotalota Task of Cost Cost Cost Analyses Time, Labor Outside Final Time, Labor Outside Final Savings,$ Savings,$ Savings,$ Payback, Per Year Hrs. Rate Costs,$ Costs,$ Hrs. Rate Costs,$ Costs,$ Per Year Per Year Per Year Years ource on ro Enter spikes In computer QA Login Book Compound spreadsheet HOU over process control c a pr n out Wastewater Enter spikes In computer CA Login Book —Mg- Compound sprea s ee Roll over process ontro c a pant ou Attachment 1 : Cost Savings Analysis and Payback (Continued) No. Old Method New Method Subtotal Total Task of Cost Cost Cost Analyses Time, Labor Outside Final Time, Labor Outside Final Savings,$ Savings,$ Savings,$ Payback, Per Year Hrs. Rate Costs,$ Costs,$ Hrs. Rate Costs,$ Costs,$ Per Year Per Year Per Year Years 604 Analyses Analyze sample Login Laboratory 225 0.016 29 0 109 0.033 29 0 218 -109 Login Organic Log 225 0.016 29 0 109 0 29 0 0 109 Fillin-worksheet 225 0.010 29. 0 68 0 29 0 0 68 Questionable sample 5 0.166 29 0 24 0.008 29 0 1 23 Enter name 225 0.008 29 0 64 0 29 0 0 54 Write response factor 225 0.012 29 0 82 0 29 0 0 82 Write in bound book 225 0.031 29 0 204 0 29 0 0 204 Calculation book 225 0.041 29 0 272 0 29 0 0 272 Verification of data 225 0.166 29 0 1083 0.083 29 0 544 540 Filing 225 0.016 29 0 108 0.016 29 0 108 0 1 Attachment 1 : Cost Savings Analysis and Payback (Continued) o. Old Method New MethodSubtotal ota Task of cost Cost Cost Analyses Time, Labor Outside Final Time, Labor Outside Final Savings,$ Savings,$ Savings,$ Payback, Per Year His. Rate Costs,$ Costs,$ Hrs. Rate Costs,$ Costs,$ Per Year Per Year Per Year Years source ontro nter spikes in computer QA Login Book L;ompouna spreadsheet Roll over process Control chart/print out Wastewater nter spikes in computer CA Login Book t;ompound spreadsheet Roll over process Control chart/print out Attachment 1 : Cost Savings Analysis and Payback (Continued) No. Old Method New Method Subtotal Total Task of Cost Cost Cost Analyses Time, Labor Outside Final Time, Labor Outside Final Savings,$ Savings,$ Savings,$ Payback, Per Year Hrs. Rate Costs,$ Costs,$ Hrs. Rate Costs,$ Costs,$ Per Year Per Year Per Year Years 606 Analyses Analyze sample Login Laboratory 88 0.016 29 0 43 0.033 29 0 85 -43 Login Organic Log 88 0.016 29 0 43 0 29 0 0 43 Fillin-worksheet 88 0.010 29 0 27 0 29 0 0 27 Questionable sample 5 0.166 29 0 24 0.008 29 0 1 23 Enter name 88 0.008 29 0 21 0 29 0 0 21 Write response factor 88 0.012 29 0 32 0 29 0 0 32 Write in bound book 88 0.031 29 0 80 0 29 0 0 80 Calculation book 88 0.041 29 0 106 0 29 0 0 106 Verification of data 88 0.166 29 0 424 0.083 29 0 213 211 Filing 88 0.016 29 0 42 0.016 29 0 42 0 ( l Attachment 1 : Cost Savings Analysis and Payback (Continued) o. Old Method New Method SubtotalTotal Task of Cost Cost Cost Analyses Time, Labor Outside Final Time, Labor Outside Final Savings,$ Savings,$ Savings,$ Payback, Per Year Hrs. Rate Costs,$ Costs,$ His. Rate Costs,$ Costs,$ Per Year Per Year Per Year Years uAIuC Source Control nter spi es in computer QA Login Book ompoun spree s eet Holl over process Control chart/print out Wastewater nter spikes in computer uA Login UOOK ompoun spree s eat Roll over process ontro c a print out Attachment 1 : Cost Savings Analysis and Payback (Continued) No. Old Method New Method Subtotal Total Task of Cost Cost Cost Analyses Time, Labor Outside Final Time, Labor Outside Final Savings,$ Savings,$ Savings,$ Payback, Per Year Hrs. Rate Costs,$ Costs,$ His. Rate Costs,$ Costs,$ Per Year Per Year Per Year Years 608 Analyses Analyze sample Login Laboratory 775 0.016 29 0 375 0.033 29 0 749 -375 Login Organic Log 775 0.016 29 0 375 0 29 0 0 375 Fillin-worksheet 775 0.010 29 0 234 0 29 0 0 234 Questionable sample 5 0.166 29 0 24 0.008 29 0 1 23 Enter name 775 0.008 29 0 187 0 29 0 0 187 Write response factor 775 0.012 29 0 281 0 29 0 0 281 Write in bound book 775 0.031 29 0 702 0 29 0 0 702 Calculation book 775 0.041 29 0 936 0 29 0 0 936 verification of data 775 0.166 29 0 3731 0.083 29 0 1872 1859 Filing 775 0.016 29 0 373 0.016 29 0 373 0 1 ( Attachment 1 : Cost Savings Analysis and Payback (Continued) o. Old Method New Method Subtotalote Task of Cost Cost Cost Analyses Time, Labor Outside Final Time, Labor Outside Final Savings,$ Savings,$ Savings,$ Payback, Per Year His. Rate Costs,$ Costs,$ His. Rate Costs,$ Costs,$ Per Year Per Year Per Year Years Source Control nter Spikes in computer CA Login Book Loompouna spreadsheet Roll over process Control chart/print out - Wastewater nter spikes in computer CA Login Book Compound spreadsheet Roll over process —(F�—2F--(F--WS-5--2T ontro c a print out Attachment 1 : Cost Savings Analysis and Payback (Continued) NO. Old MeI od We—wlg-elffi-oa SubtotalTotal Task of Cost Cost Cost Analyses Time, Labor Outside Final Time, Labor Outside Final Savings,$ Savings,$ Savings,$ Payback, Per Year Hrs. Rate Costs,$ Costs,$ His. Rate Costs,$ Costs,$ Per Year Per Year Per Year Years , and monthly input from rgamcs Input from Inorganics Input from Bacteriology nput I rom UeneraTC1757istry Check or data entry error Data Entry for Calculate a ians flublication o orms Final assembly of report Summary of Detection Summary o 76004 eta entry by other msrons. TY- Attachment 1 : Cost Savings Analysis and Payback (Continued) o. Old MethodNew Method SubtotalTotal Task of Cost Cost Cost Analyses Time, Labor Outside Final Time, Labor Outside Final Savings,$ Savings,$ Savings,$ Payback, Per Year Hrs. Rate Costs,$ Costs,$ Hrs. Rate Costs,$ Costs,$ Per Year Per Year Per Year Years norganics Login Laboratory Bring green s ee s o ra er og n greens eats Print work sheets Take to General Chemistry Look thru refrigerator Log In heavy me a iges on Write label for igesl on Remove label to test tube Enter sample Id&checks Labelampe Log results on green sheet Paradox ng oil Attachment 1: Cost Savings Analysis and Payback(Continued) No. Old Method New Method Subtotal Total Task of Cost Cost Cost Analyses Time, Labor Outside Final Time, Labor Outside Final Savings,$ Savings,$ Savings,$ Payback, Per Year Hrs. Rate Costs,$ Costs,$ Hrs. Rate Costs,$ Costs,$ Per Year Per Year Per Year Years Control charts 260 0.5 29 0 3770 0.083 29 0 628 3142 ERA 12 3.5 29 0 1218 0.5 29 0 174 10" Control charts 260 0.5 29 0 3770 0.083 29 0 628 3142 ERA 12 3.5 29 0 1218 0.5 29 0 174 1044 31229 Statistical calculations 12 20 29 0 6960 3 29 0 1044 5916 Control charts-Plant 2 52 5 29 0 7540 0.5 29 0 754 6786 Control charts-Plant 1 52 6 29 0 7540 0.5 29 0 754 6786 19488 190136 Payback m 608,1001190.136 3.2 years 3.2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 1991 -92 JOINT WORKS BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE PIAITATION to?olitan Or QIs �el p,9a U `Since 1951, .t SINGE Coo�� MAY 2291991 _ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 1991 -92 JOINT WORKS BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE PN�TATION topolitaa O OIST ` tp 9 � J ra P(0 C� 0 U w o N c. (7 = J 1 K \r ''GE COO MAY 22, 1991 COUNTY SANTTANON DISTRICTS A ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA May 22, 1991 1 eu SAa UE r P.O.BO%8127 FOUNfmt V1LLLEY.CaL60fmu 9Q]28.812] mn sazx++ r MEMORANDUM To: Boards of Directors From: Executive Committee Subject: Summary Report and Recommendations re 1991-92 Joint Works .. Budgets (Personnel, Joint Operating Fund and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund) .. Recommendation The Executive Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee's recommendation to adopt the enclosed 1991-92 Joint Works Personnel, Operating and Construction Budgets. Summary Report The accompanying budget documents provide detailed information concerning the proposed Joint Works budgets. The following discussion highlights and summarizes the recommendations for the three elements of the Joint Works budgets. r PERSONNEL (See Blue/Gold Report) New Positions r - Summarv: Staff has previously advised the Directors that major treatment plant expansion underway and new program implementation necessary to comply with changing regulatory ` requirements would require significant staffing increases to operate and maintain the new facilities and to support related activities and other required programs. We currently have $204.5 million in new treatment plant facilities and $16.9 million in individual District facilities ,. under construction. An additional $169.5 million in treatment facilities and $54.1 million in collection facilities are being designed and will be constructed and placed into service over the next several years, and another $112 million worth of projects are in the planning stages. The 30-year Action Plan Master Plan adopted by the Boards in August 1989 projects capital improvements totaling $1.48 billion (in 1989 dollars) r under current NPDES permit conditions. r I . W Summary Report and Recommendations Page 2 May 22, 1991 66 V This year our various departments requested 60 new positions. li The General Manager and the Fiscal Policy Committee have Ir reviewed those requests with the Department Heads and are recommending 27 new positions for 1991-92 . Many of these I � positions will not be filled until later in the year, and some may not be filled at all in 1991-92 if completion of construction projects is delayed. Seven of the 27 positions are to replace consultants or part-time positions being deleted. ) v Summary of Proposed Additional Staffing Program/System Position y Management I � Board Secretary & Support 1 Management Support 1 � I Finance Purchasing/warehouse 1 - ) i Information Services 3 y Operations and Maintenance I � General Plant and Equipment Maintenance 7 V Technical Services I . it Regulatory Compliance (Air, Land, Water) 4 Source Control Program 3 Process Monitoring and Laboratory 7 y Total 27 it 6J The proposed new positions would raise the authorized staffing level from 643 to 670, an increase of approximately 4.2%. V Annual Cost Based upon the anticipated need to fill the proposed new positions ids over the course of the next year, the recommendations would add $1, 155,928 or approximately 5.2%, to the estimated fiscal year � f 1991-92 salary budget. Employee benefits paid by the Districts including retirement, health, life, disability, workers, V compensation and unemployment insurance and uniforms would add approximately 27% to the salary totals. 1 ; U V 4 Summary Report and Recommendations Page 3 May 22, 1991 Memoranda of Understanding Salary Adjustments As the Directors are aware, the three-year Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) with the Districts' employee groups are currently being reconsidered by the groups and management. A new three year MOD was authorized by the Board on May 8, 1991 with Operations and Maintenance Employees. Meetings with other groups have not yet resulted in tentative agreements. Salary ranges specified in the personnel report and recommendations are those in effect at the conclusion of the last three-year MOD period. Therefore, any position classifications and salary ranges authorized by the Boards herein shall be adjusted in an amount equal to any adjustments authorized by the Boards of Directors, pursuant to approved Memoranda of Understanding at the conclusion of that process. For Operations and Maintenance Employees, represented by the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 501, those adjustments are 58 effective May 3, 1991, and 5.5% effective November 29, 1991. An allowance for similar adjustments for the other employee units has been included in the salaries and wages portion of the Joint Operating budget (green) . Proiected Total Payroll Cost The full employment payroll estimate is $33.6 million, but we expect to realize a payroll budget savings of approximately 10% due to personnel turnover, delays in filling new positions, tight control over hiring activities, temporary adjustments in plant operation schedules and procedures to minimize staffing, and delays in major construction schedules. Our total payroll cost is therefore targeted at $30.3 million. Net payroll and benefits, after chargeouts to CORF and the Districts, account for approximately 45% of the total budgeted Joint Operating costs. The actual payroll budget savings may be affected by pending classification studies and the meet-and-confer process underway since the current three year Memoranda of Understanding expired. There are provisions in the proposed budget for changes similar to those approved May 8th for the O&M Employees. Any proposed changes will be considered by the full Board prior to implementation. JOINT OPERATING BUDGET - JO (See Green Reportl The $50 million Joint Operating budget finances the operating and maintenance costs of the joint treatment works and the joint administrative activities. The major factors that are causing increases in our Joint Works operating and maintenance costs include: Summary Report and Recommendations v Page 4 May 22, 1991 II b - Regulatory Requirements: More stringent air pollution control requirements mandated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) for control and reduction of hydrogen sulfide (B2S) , oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and oxides of sulfur (SOx) emissions, resulting in higher operational costs to remove pollutants from the digester gas produced in our treatment plants and control emissions from our digester gas fired engines. � I L+ - Increased costs for engineering, monitoring, enforcement, outside and in-house laboratory services and special project I � activities carried out by the Compliance, Laboratory and Source V Control staffs to comply with the ocean monitoring and pretreatment program provisions of our NPDES permit as well as our AQMD permit requirements. f - Increased costs for use of higher volumes of chemicals such as �r ferric chloride and anionic polymer used in our physical/ chemical treatment systems to improve solids removal rr efficiencies as required to maintain compliance with the discharge limits set forth in our NPDES permit. 1 , - Sludge Disposal: The closure of the Coyote Canyon landfill with no replacement for sludge disposal, as well as increased cost for hauling and disposal in a private landfill of waste L+ activated sludge and grit and screenings which the Regional Water Quality Control Board has determined cannot be disposed of at a municipal landfill; and higher costs for private reuse I � alternatives to landfill disposal. Li - Odor Control: Increased chemical usage for expanded odor II control program including 20 new foul air scrubbers as well as Lr increases in the unit cost of caustic soda. - Repairs and Maintenance: Increased maintenance and repair activities throughout the Districts' expanded and upgraded v treatment facilities. i Comparison with 1990-91 Budget: The accompanying excerpt from Schedule A of the Joint Operating Budget (Green Report) highlights the comparisons between the proposed 1991-92 budget and last year's II budget and also summarizes the reasons for the increases (and it decreases) by major budget category. Increase Over 1990-91 Budget: The $2.4 million increase is 5.1% ! I over the 1990-91 budget. Of this, 3.2% (or nearly 64% of the �+ increase) is directly attributable to regulatory mandates such as improved wastewater treatment and AQMD regulations requiring li significant improvements in control of air emissions, and increased VI costs for chemicals, as well as the ocean monitoring, pretreatment I V 11 60 r Summary Report and Recommendations Page 5 May 22, 1991 r and toxics control requirements set forth in our NPDES permit. The .. remaining portion of the increase, or about 1.9% (36% of the increase) is due to inflation related increases in the costs of operating and maintaining expanded facilities and to accommodate additional flows into our treatment facilities. SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE PLANS The Districts have been self insured for several types of coverage for the past several years as a result of Fiscal Policy Committee recommendations that were implemented by the Joint Boards of Directors. Workers' Compensation and Public Liability r - The Workers' Compensation and Public Liability plans have been in existence since 1979. - The savings realized through these self insured plans plus in-lieu premiums deposited and interest earnings on the reserves in these funds have resulted in a current reserve level of $2.9 million, compared to the original $500,000 reserve level set by the Boards when the plans were established. The Committee recommends that the reserve level proposed for 1991-92 for the Workers' Compensation fund and the fully self-insured Public Liability Fund be maintained at the current levels. -� - An appropriation of $180,000 for in-lieu premium contributions by the Districts is recommended in the Workers' Compensation Fund to maintain the existing reserve level at $637, 000. - A $265,000 appropriation has been included in the Public Liability Fund for excess loss insurance in the event the availability of this coverage makes it desirable to the Directors. - The Fiscal Policy Committee is again recommending that the r Boards of the individual Districts continue the practice of setting aside reserve funds to partially cover deductible levels for the Districts' all-risk property insurance coverage. The reserves are recommended to be maintained at the $5 million level for 1991-92. Health Plan - The self-funded Employee Health Plan has also been in existence since 1979. Our claims experience in 1990-91 r appears to indicate that the cost containment provisions enacted in 1984, which included both increased deductible requirements and co-payment levels, have become somewhat r �. Summary Report and Recommendations Page 6 May 22, 1991 1 � V ineffective in helping to stabilize our claims levels on a per-employee basis. Total costs have increased in response to u continuing increases in the total numbers of active employees, their dependents, and retired employees participating in the plan, and the cost per employee covered has also increased. However, there are several large losses being paid this year which are not expected to be repeated in 1991-92. li These increased total medical care costs required transfers �w into this fund during the past year over and above the anticipated premiums. However, we have partially recovered ji some of these expenditures from increased premiums paid by y employees for family coverage, and stop loss insurance. Recently approved three-year MOO with Operations and Maintenance Employees include increased contributions by employees for family members for each of the next three years. At the end of the MOO period, the self-funded and HMO plans will be approximately the same cost for an employee. j ! V CORF BUDGET (See Yellow Report) The $114 .1 million Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF) Budget y finances the construction of the Joint Treatment Works Facilities. It includes major and minor projects which have generally been previously presented to the Boards for review as part of the Master i ( Plan and/or agenda process. Any project under $15,000 requires informal bidding. Projects over $15,000 require formal bidding, and any projects over $25,000 require Board approval in accordance j ! with District procurement regulations. The budget is prepared 60 under assumptions included in the 30-year Master Plan approved last July by the Directors. - Source of Funds: The budget will be financed from existing v capital funds accumulated in the individual Districts, Capital Facilities Funds, new connection fees, and from new borrowing to be approved by the Directors, and recommended in the "2020 v VISION" Master Plan. ii - Master-Planned Projects: The 1991-92 CORF requirements total u $114, 120,000, an increase of $10,698,000 over 1990-91. The budget includes funds for several major master-planned I , projects, including completing the construction of the central L power generation facilities at both plants, additional primary treatment and sludge handling facilities at Plant 1, a 120" interplant line, a new operations/control center and the completion of a new central laboratory. bw j ' v V Summary Report and Recommendations Page 7 May 22, 1991 y - Project Categorization: Schedule B-2 (blue) entitled Classification of Budgeted Projects by Revenue Program Categories classifies all the proposed 1991-92 capital outlay projects into three categories to assist the Directors in evaluating the need for the proposed levels of expenditures. Total planned improvements through 2020 are also categorized. These categories are: - Replacement/Reconstruction Projects - These projects are required to replace or rehabilitate aging or deteriorated equipment or structures. - Improvement/Upgrade Projects - These projects are mandated by various regulatory agencies, including the EPA, State Regional Water Quality Control Boards, South Coast Air Quality Management District, and other local agencies. - Additional Capacity/Increased Hydraulic Requirements Projects - These projects are required to accommodate increase hydraulic requirements (additional flows) that the Joint Works facilities must process and dispose of over the next five to ten years, as identified in the latest Joint Works Master Plan. The $114, 120,000 in proposed CORF projects is allocated to these three categories as follows: Project Category 1991-92 Budget Allocation Replacement/Reconstruction $ 31,289,300 Improvement/Upgrade 17,417,250 Increased Hydraulic Requirements 65,413,450 Total 1991-92 CORF Budget $114, 120,000 The staff is available to answer any questions from the Directors. If you desire additional information before the meeting, please .. contact Wayne Sylvester or Gary Streed at (714 ) 962-2411. GGS:WS:lc '� REF:BUDGET91/JBJOFD. 1-7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY _ PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS Ptk%TATlo V yeio4°litan O 40 ro o C� `S+nce 1954 GggNGE C001PP 1991-1992 FISCAL YEAR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS on ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA May 22, 1991 1 B ELLIS AVENUE A.BOM E12, FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92729-8127 MEMORANDUM 71GI2I12.2AH TO: Boards of Directors FROM: Executive Committee SUBJECT: Proposed Personnel and Organizational Changes for Fiscal Year 1991-92 BTPICGROUMID During the annual budget preparation process, the staff evaluates personnel regmix Snents for the upcoming and future fiscal years. This review, of staffing needs takes into consideration programs set forth in the Boards' 30-year wastewater management action plan, "2020 VISION," adopted by the Directors in 1989; and anticipated new or expanded regulations and programmatic changes, the start up of new facilities and the ongoing malnTenen ce and operation of the existing Joint Works Treatment Facilities and the individual Districts' collections systems. Staff recommendations for the 1991-92 fiscal year are contained in this report. SUMMRY OF RECOMMENDATIONS The Committee has previously been advised that major treatment plant expansion underway, and new programs being ialplenented to comply with changing regulatory req,irenents, would require significant staffing increases to operate and maintain the facilities and to provide support for related activities and other �. required programs. Virtually all Districts' activities are dictated by regulatory authorities. For example, at the federal level, the U.S. E nvironm atal Protection Agency; at the state level, the Water Quality Control Board; and at the local level, the South Coast Air Quality Management District and the Health Deparbrent. With our sewerage facilities expanding at the rate of about $100 million a year, and the regulatory authorities imposing stricter requirements, we have little choice but to provide the staffing necessary to operate and maintain the plants and carry out the programmatic needs. Very few of our projects or programs are discretionary. Despite the ongoing growth in facilities and program requirements at the Sanitation Districts, we understand that not all agencies are graving today. Governmental agencies in Orange County, throughout the state, and even nationally are experiencing financial problems. Many are finding it necessary to freeze hiring, lay off employees and cut programs. Although mach of this is a reflection of the current economic downturn in the ration, the log-term outlook for governmental agencies funding has never been more bleak. Proposed Personnel and Organizational ' Page Two May 22, 1991 In response to these current economic concerns, the General Manager has directed staff to take the following precautionary measures: - 1. Inplement a hiring freeze. Exceptions will be considered when an urgent need can be justified. 2. Develop a contingency plan in the event staffing cutbacks became necessary. 3. Identify work or projects that can be contracted or privatized. 4. Identify prograns that can be reduced or eliminated. This year our various departrnesnts requested 60 new positions. The General Manager has reviewed those requests in detail with the Departirent Heads and is recomerxiing that the Directors consider authorizing 27 new positions for - 1991-92. Mannyy of these positions will not be filled until later in the year, and sore may not be filled at all in 1991-92 if canpletion of construction projects is delayed. Seven of the 27 positions are to replace consultants or _ part-time positions being deleted. Sumltary of Proposed Additional Staffing Program/System Positions Management - Board Secretary 1 Management Support 1 _ Finance Purchasing/Warehouse 1 ' Information Services 3 Operations and Maintenance General Plant and Equipment Maintenance 7 Technical Services Regulatory Conpliance 4 Source Control Program 3 '- Process YSonritoring 7 TOTAL ADDITIONS 27 - The proposed new positions would raise the authorized staffing level from 643 to _ 670, an inncrease of approximtely 4.2%. Proposed Personnel and Organizational Changes Page Three May 22, 1991 ANNUAL COST Based upon the anticipated need to fill the proposed new positions only when needed over the course of the next year, the recon endations would add $1,155,928 or approximately 5.2% to the estimated fiscal year 1991-92 salary budget. The maximum salary cost of the proposed organizational changes detailed in this report for both next year and future years when all positions are eventually filled, assuming top of the range salaries, is summarized on a department basis as follows: MAXIMUM SALARY COST OF CHANGES Deoarbnent 1991-92 Full Emmolovment Management $ 96,492 $ 96,492 Finance 175,237 227,136 Operations & Maintenance 254,550 289,320 Technical Services 633,435 664,920 Engineering (3,786) 20,172 TDfA2, $1,155,928 $1,298,040 Out-of-pccket employee benefits paid by the Districts, including retirement, health, life, disability, workers' compensation and unemployment insurance and uniforms, would add approximately 27% to the above salary totals. QrHER PENDING MID-YEAR ORGANIC AL CHANGES Reports on the following organizational changes were submitted to the Fiscal Policy and Executive Committees in February, because of the need to be considered prior to the completion of the 1991-92 budget process, and were approved by the Joint Boards in March 1991. Engineering/Scientific Intern Procram: Last year the Fiscal Policy Committee recamanded and the Boards approved the implementation of an Engineering/Scientific Intern Program authorizing employment of nine college students part-time to help on specific projects and to serve as a basis for recruitment of future engineers and scientists to work full-time for the Districts. The initial year of the program proved to be highly successful. The interns have made valuable contributions and many would be considered for employment upon graduation. Staff recommended an increase in authorized interns from 9 to 18 for 1991-92 to do construction shop drawing review, engineering field work, engineering design work, research projects, literature review, project assistance and to relieve operators scheduled for training. This organizational change was recamended in advance of the budget process to allow the Districts to participate in the college recruitment process and to take advantage of the summer vacation availability of engineering and science students prior to the July start of the fiscal year. Proposed Personnel and Organizational Changes + Page Four May 22, 1991 laboratory Division: A net increase of four additional staff menbers were recomended in the Laboratory Division to support new regulatory ., and health ,eqn;renents and other programmatic needs. These additions were requested because of new requirements by the: 1) Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 2) Department of Health services Laboratory Certification Program, 3) increased source control sanpling, 4) expwded programs to monitor ocean waters for bacteria and viruses, 5) new, laboratory ;nstzu,nentation requirenents, and 6) new air quality requirements. To meet these many needs, the addition of one Laboratory Supervisor, three Scientists and two Principal laboratory and Research Analysts were recommended. These additions were partially offset by the elimination of two Part-time Assistant positions. An unbudgeted classification of Assistant Laboratory Manager was also deleted. Source Control Division: New U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations make it necessary for the Districts' Source Control Division to increase its enforcement efforts against industries for even the slightest violation of their pennits. These regulations will increase the number of monies requiring significant staff attention by seven times. To respond to these increased needs and to comply with the EPA/State Water Resources Control Hoard/California Regional Water Quality Control Board audit recommendations, two Associate Engineers wire recommended to be added to the Enforceirent Section. Engineering Denartnent: Instrumentation, control and electrical parer e. engineering needs have grown to be dispr port ,note to other technical disciplines in recent years. The master plan calls for on-site generation of electrical power, now being inplemented by the $66 + million Central Power Generation Systems projects, full baclmp with Southern California Edison power, and a third source of k ado parer via energency standby generation equi ne„t. All evicting, older electric motors are being replaced with high-efficiency variable frequency drives. All process equipment is being monitored and, in sane cases, controlled by a distributed control system which utilizes on-site couputers with central monitoring. High technology sanpling and monitoring instruments are now required on most procesess to ensure continuous couplian:e with South Coast Air Qnal ity Manageent District(SCAOM) requirements and With full plant electrification required by the SCAlQM, electrical and control needs will stay at high levels. An opportunity to recruit an experienced, high-level engineer with expertise in electrical, as well as control and instrumntation system design and construction, led to the reco mendation for one Senior Engineer to head up a section to meet our expanding needs. + Proposed Personnel. and Organization Changes Page Five May 22, 1991 The above proposals and recommendations are reflected in the existing authorized personnel numbers and organizational charts in this report. MEMDFANDA OF UNDERSTANDING SAiARY ADJUSiMM As the Directors are aware, the three-year Memoranda of Understanding (MA1) with the Districts' employee groups are currently being reconsidered by the groups and management. Although a tentative agreement has been reached with the representatives of the operations and Maintenance Employees, that agreement has yet to be ratified. Meetings with other groups have not yet resulted in tentative agreements. Salary ranges specified in this report and recommendations are those in effect at the conclusion of the last three-year MJU period. Therefore, any position classifications and salary ranges authorized by the Boards herein shall be adjusted in an amount equal to any adjustments authorized by the Boards of _ Directors, pursuant to approved Memoranda of Understanding at the conclusion of that process. DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED 1991-92 STAFFING CHANGES The following discussion provides a summary explanation of the proposed staff changes for 1991-92. The salary cost and position changes are summarized in Exhibit A by Department and Division, and in Exhibit B by position classification. Organization charts incorporating the proposed changes are also included. F1AIUYaNENP DEPAI3NP ~ The Management Department includes the General Manager's office, the Board Secretary's office, the Public Information office, the Management Support office and the Personnel and Safety/Security office. Twenty-five full-time and 12 part-time positions are currently authorized in this department. 2150- General Manager's Office Test year a consulting firm conducted a classification study of administrative and clerical positions which resulted in recommended changes that were adopted by the Boards. At the time the study was conducted, the General Manager did not have a designated secretary and was sharing two management secretaries. since then, several organizational changes have been made resulting in secretarial reassignments. Accordingly, it is recommended that the position of Secretary to the General Manager be established at a salary range of $2,561 - $3,185 per month to recognize the responsibilities of the person now performing that role. Concurrently, it is recommended that one Administrative Secretary position ($2,343 - $2,914) be deleted. Proposed Personnel and Organizational Changes Page Six May 22, 1991 2160 Board Secretary's Office There have been no staffing additions to the Board Secretary's office since the early 1970's. We have been able to accommodate the increase in workload by implementing office automation and the fact that there has been no turnover in the office for the past eight years. Over the last several years, two new Districts have been formed and the Boards have adopted an ambitious new wastewater management program of expanded and new, facilities and programs which require considerable ongoing Hoard activity. To address the added demand placed on the Board Secretary's office from these activities, coupled with evolving legal record keeping and reporting requirements, and anticipated future organizational changes, it is now appropriate to establish the new position of Assistant Secretary to the Board of Directors at a salary range of $2,819 - $3,506 per month. 2170 Management Surnxut The Management Support office currently has two Office Aides ($1,806 - $2,246) that perform routine general office duties including mail room activities, reproduction, collaring, sorting and filing work, courier duties and light housekeeping, including preparation, serving and cleaning up of meals served at Directors' committee meetings. As the entire organization continues to grow to respond to increasing regulatory and wastewater treatment demands, so does the need for this type of support work. Staff is, therefore, recommending that one office aide be added in the new classification of Senior Office Aide at the salary of $1,961 - $2,438 per month. 2180 - Personnel and Safety/Security A title change is recommnded for the authorized but vacant position of Risk and Safety Manager ($4,342 - $5,645). Changes in OSHA regulations and District needs have caused a need to refocus the principal duties of this position, which is expected to be filled in the very near future, which are better reflected in the title of Safety and Health Manager. No change in salary is proposed. The structure of the personnel side of the Division is proposed to be revised to better reflect job duties and different levels of responsibility and to standardize job titles. A new position of Personnel Supervisor ($3,444 - $4,477) is proposed to provide supervision of day-today activities. A new position of Senior Personnel Analyst ($3,001-$3,901) is proposed at the salary level of the existing Personnel Analyst position which is proposed to be reduced to $2,561 - $3,185 per month. The salary level for the existing positions of Personnel Assistant ($2,425 - $3,015) is also recommended to be reduced, to $2,343 - $2,914 and two positions will be eliminated. A new position of Personnel Aide ($2,057 - $2,558) is proposed to provide general assistance and clerical support to the Personnel office staff. Proposed Personnel and Organizational Changes Page Seven May 22, 1991 The Senior Security GHans] ($1,811 - $2,255) position is recommended to be eliminated as the security staff can be adequately supervised by other positions after the above changes are completed. Four of the 12 Part-time Security (bard ($7.00/hr. max.) positions are proposed to be eliminated and replaced by four Security Guard ($1,118 - $1,390) positions on a full-time basis to improve the services provided. FINANCE DEPARTMENT The Finance Department includes the Director of Finance's office, the Accounting Division, the Purchasing and Warehouse Division and the Information Services; Division. A total of 56 positions are currently authorized in this Department. 2210 - Director of Finance's Office No changes ante proposed in this office. 2220 - Pccountinc Division No changes are proposed in this division. 2230 - Purchasing Division An additional Buyer ($2,561 - $3,185) position is recommended to provide a position to allow the hiring and training of a Buyer to replace a retiring employee prior to the actual retirement. Except for the period of overlap, no 9ncre9Oe in actual staffing level is proposed. 2240 - Information Services Division This evolving Division was added during the 1989-90 budget process to coordinate, implement and maximize the utilization of computers of all types in all departments. The retiting of one existing Information Services Specialist ($3,987 - $5,183) to Software Specialist, at no change in salary, is proposed to better reflect the duties and expertise of the incumbent and the organization of the division. Three Programmer/Analyst ($3,472 - $4,513) positions are proposed to replace two Programmer ($21743 - $3,4ll) positions, a net increase of one position. These _ more highly skilled positions are required to support planned mini-ccuputer applications and systems for computerized maintenance management, laboratory information management, finance and accounting, the central generation facilities and for monitoring the plant processes. Two positions in a new classification of Information Services Analyst ($3,472 - $4,513) are proposed to be responsible for the interface between the Districts' several local area networks (LAN) of personal computers and the anticipated mini-cmputer systems and the increasers demands of the IAN's and the telecommunications systems. Proposed Personnel and Organizational Changes Page Eight May 22, 1991 OPERATIONS AND I+ INIENANCE DEPARMENr The Operations and Maintenance Department is responsible for the day-to-day Operations and maintenance of Joint Works Treatment Facilities and the individual Districts' collection systems. There are 364 authorized positions in this Department which is organized into 7 Divisions. 3310 - Director of Operations and Maintenance Office The addition of one Secretary ($2,057 - $2,558) position and the deletion of one Senior Clerk ($1,806 - $2,246) position is proposed to recognize the level of work and qualifications required for the Operations Division Secretary. 3330 - Plant Maintenance The Plant Maintenance Division is responsible for digester cleaning, gas maintenance, painting, plying, carpentry, janitorial services and general labor assignments throughout the plants. Fifty-six positions are currently authorized for this Division. Three additional Painter ($2,120 - $2,640) positions are recommended in order to respond to the increased needs at both plants and at the spray booth. One Equipment Operator ($2,399 - $2,987) position is proposed to be deleted from this Division and transferred to the Mechanical Maintenance Division (see below). 3340 - Collection Facilities Division 3340 is responsible for maintenance of the Districts' more than 800 miles of trunkline sewers, outlying pump stations, in-plant side stream pump stations and the trunk serer caustic soda injection program for odor control. There are 31 authorized positions in this Division, and no changes are proposed. 3350 - Mechanical Maintenance The Mechanical Maintenance Division includes 69 authorized positions. This Division is responsible for naintaining a wide variety of mechanical equipment throughout the two treatment plants, including stationary engines, Amps, hydraulic systems and belt filter presses, as well as the vehicle fleet and the portable/emergency equipment. An additional Equipment Operator ($2,399 - $2,987) position is proposed to be transferred from the Plant Maintenance Division (see above) to accommodate current work assignments. Proposed Personnel and Organizational Changes Page Nine May 22, 1991 3360 - Electrical Maintenance The Electrical Maintenance Division is responsible for all electrical equipment including motors, switchgear, lights, pumps, substations and cabling within the plants and at the pump stations. Twenty-six Positions are authorized within the Division. No changes are proposed. 3370 - instrumentation Maintenance Division 3370, which has 27 authorized positions, is responsible for the installation, maintenance and repair of thousands of meters, controls, programmable logic controllers, transmitters and other instrumentation throughout the plants and at outlying pump stations. These components provide vital information for monitoring plant processes to help ensure that they are operating properly and that the Districts comply with our ocean discharge and air quality emissions requirements. All of the new facilities under construction, as well as those recently completed, have extensive programmable logic controllers and other scpbisticated instruments. As the projects are completed the essential preventive maintenance and repair work becomes the responsibility of the instrumentation Division. In order for staffing to keep pace with the expanding responsibilities, one additional Lead Instmmrentation Tech ($2,906 - $3,618), two additional Inst„ mentation Tech II ($2,751 - $3,425) and one additional Instrumentation Tech I ($2,334 - $2,906) are proposed; a total increase of four positions. 3380 - Plant O�eratione The 126 authorized positions in the Plant Operations Division are responsible for operating the sewage treatment and disposal processes at both plants and for meeting the Districts' NPDES ocean discharge permit requirments. These responsibilities require staffing at the plants 24 hours per day, seven days per week. m proximately 75% of the time this is the only Division with staff on site. An additional Pump Power Operator ($2,658 - $3,310) position is recommended to add depth to this technical specialty to enable around-the-clock operation of the central generation facilities and the production of electricity for in-plant use. Three additional Plant Operator ($2,318 - $2,886) positions are requested in place of four Operator-In-Training ($1,900 - $2,366) positions to reflect the need for more highly trained staff to operate the plants 24 hours each day. Proposed Personnel and Organizational Changes Page Ten May 22, 1991 TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARIME The Technical Services Department is responsible for the Districts' industrial tcocics sauce control program; the conservation, recycling and reuse program; testing and analysis of samples to monitor treatment plant processes andT industrial discharges; coupliance with env5rcrmcntal standards; administration of the $2 million per year ocean monitoring program; and the Districts' liaison efforts on a wide variety of air, land and water laws and regulations which govern cur operations. There are currently 114 authorized positions in five Divisions. 3510 - Director of Technical Services Office Air quality laws and regulations continue to change at the federal, state and regional level. The federal Clean Air Act, California State Legislature and the California Air Resources Board are bringing new air quality requirements on a statewide basis. On the basis of the South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD) air quality management plan and other considerations, the SCAQM continues to place increasingly stringent peruit requirements on the Districts. All of these developing issues create an increasing demand for Districts' staff time for responses and for coordination of the efforts of various Districts' personnel working in the Technical Services, Engineering, and Operations and Mauitenance Departments. Our ability to maintain agency,-wide coordination and effective responsiveness in this rapidly changing and growing regulatory arena is being challenged. last year, in response to these increasing air quality issues and demands, the Directors approved a new Air Quality Manager ($4,342 - $5,645) position to be responsible for the day-to-day oversight of these activities from the Director of Technical Services' ,. office. At this time, it is appropriate to create a new Air Quality Management Division and to transfer this position into that new Division (see discussion below under Air Quality Management). 3520 - Cmpliance The Compliance Division consists of 14 full-time staff and utilizes several consultants in their quality assurance/quality control section, the marine monitoring/marine science section and the air quality section. �. The Air Quality Section, consisting of one Engineer ($3,893 - $5j061) position and the incumbent, are proposed to be transferred to the new Air Quality Ma nagmwnt Division to continue the work on rules assessment, planning and pemnit administration (see discussion below under Air Quality Management). Proposers Personnel and Reorganizational Changes Page Eleven May 22, 1991 Two Principal Hrvircrmental Specialist ($3,419 - $4,444) positions are proposer) to replace one Senior Environmantan Specialist ($2,978 - $3,703) and one Environmental Specialist II ($2,669 - $3,319) to more properly reflect the level of expertise and the qualifications for the work required. A new Clerk ($1,618 - $2,013) position is recammended to provide computer data input support for professional staff in order to better utilize their productive time. 3530 - Conservation. Reclamation and Reuse Division The Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Division is responsible for the Districts' water conservation program both within the plants and within the community, wastewater recycling and wastewater treatment residuals reuse. No changes are proposed for this Division which has five authorized positions. 3540 - Air Quality Management In response to the increasing importance of air quality matters previously described for the Director of Technical Services' office and to provide a more focused monitoring, administration and response to the emerging federal, state and regional laws and regulations, the formation of a new Air Quality Management: Division is proposed. This Division will provide the leadership and analysis necessary for the Districts to achieve compliance with all applicable air regulations, consistent with our 30-year Master Plan, "2020 VISION," which establishes shes consistent cmpliance with all environmental regulations as one of its key objectives. This Division is proposed to be created with five authorized positions, two of which will be transferred from other Divisions. The Air Quality Manager ($4,342 - $5,645) position is proposed to be transferrer) from the Director of Technical Services' office to provide day-to-day oversight of the Division's workload and to focus cur activities (see above discussion under Director of Technical Services and Compliance). Two Engineer ($3,893 - $5,061) positions are proposed to provide rules assessment and evaluation, planning and permit administration. One of these Engineer positions, as wall as the existing employee, is proposed to be transferred from the Compliance Division. A new Scientist ($3,776 - $4,909) position is recaonended to be responsible for special projects and research. One Secretary ($2057 - $2,558) position is proposed to provide clerical support to this new Division. Proposed Personnel and Organizational Changes Page Twelve May 22, 1991 3580 - Ialwratory The Laboratory Division performs analysis of samples from the various industrial waste pevnittees, from the treatment plant processes and from the ocean monitoring program, to determine cc pliane with regulatory reg+irements and the effectiveness of plant operations, and to determ;ne our effects on public health and the environment. There are 42 positions authorized in this Division. Three Principal Laboratory and Research Analyst ($2,900 - $3,770) positions are proposed to provide support to the recently approved Scientists in developing advanced procedures and performing research and development activities in the virology and instrumental areas. Concurrently, the deletion of all three Laboratory Specialist ($2,838 - $3,530) positions is proposed to realign the organization of the Division to better reflect work assignments, reporting relationships and levels of responsibility. Eight additional Senior Laboratory Analyst ($2,669 - $3,319) positions are proposed to meet additional workload requirements from changing regulations and to perform specialized analyses and data reduction and validation in the source control, virology, marine monitoring, air _ guality, instrumental and general chemistry sections. One Lab Analyst ($2,280-$2,835) position is proposed to be deleted to provide a better mix of classifications within the Division to accommodate the work load level. 3590 - Source Control The 43 position Source Control Division is the front line of the Districts' program to control toxic discharges to the sewerage system to protect our envircrmient and to ensure our ability to comply with IIDES permit effluent requirements. A new Senior Engineer ($4,342 - $5,645) position is proposed to be .. responsible for the Enforcement Section which is expanding and reorganizing in response to new EPA regulations and increased ram,;rements. One additional Engineer ($3,893 - $5,061) position is recommended to provide additional engineering up rv:ed.on and technical oversight to the Permit Section. This addition will be offset by the deletion of one Assistant Engineer ($2,881 - $3,746) position. Proposed Personnel and Organizational Changes Page Thirteen May 22, 1991 The Source Control field staff is proposed to be expanded by the addition of two Sauce Control Inspector II ($2,458 - $3,057) and one Source Control Inspector I ($2,188 - $2,721) positions. This expansion is required to meet new EPA regulations which make it necessary to increase our enforcement efforts and which redefine those industries which will require additional monitoring and technical assistance. The Senior Accounting Clerk ($1,961 - $2,438) position is proposed to be deleted as the job responsibilities have been assumed by the Accounting Division. This position is proposed to be replaced by an additional Senior Clerk ($1,806 - $2,246) position. One additional Clerk ($1,618 - $2,013) position is proposed to replace two part-time Assistant ($8.80/hr. max.) positions to provide full-time support for the technical staff. ENGINEERING DEPAF MW The three Divisions of the Engineering Department include 72 authorized positions. Additionally, nine temporary construction inspectors (who receive no benefits) are currently employed and consultants are utilized to assist in construction management activities through professional services contracts. The Department is responsible for planning and managing the Districts' facilities expansion and improvement projects. The recanTended new facilities in the "2020 VISION" Master Plan total $1.48 billion over the next 30 years in 1989 dollars. 3510 - Director of Engineering All of the secretarial and clerical staff for the ffingineering Department is authorized in the Director's office, although some are utilized in the other Divisions. One additional Senior Clerk ($1,806 - $2,246) position is reccume ded to replace one Clerk ($1,618 - $2,013) position in order to provide a higher level of support appropriate to the work requirements. 3720 - Planning and Deeionn The deletion of one Assistant Engineer ($2,881 - $3,746) position is proposed in this Division. 3750 - Electrical. Instrumentation and Control This new Division was created mid-year to provide specialized technical expertise in the fields of electrical, instrumentation and control in support of the work done in the Planing and Design and the Construction Management Divisions. The Associate Engineer ($3,419 - $4,444) position is proposed to be deleted and replaced by an Engineer ($3,893 - $5,061) position and incumbent which will be transferred from the Construction Management Division to better utilize existing staff. Proposed Personnel and Organization changes Page Fourteen May 22, 1991 A Senior Engineering Associate ($3,211 - $3,993) position is proposed to replace an outside consultant currently performing this function. One Senior Construction Inspector ($3,061 - $3,806) position and two Construction Inspector ($2,800 - $3,482) positions) and all three incumbent employees are proposed to be transferrer) from the Construction Management Division to better reflect the reporting relationship and the specialized nature of the inspection services required The vacant Engineering Aide I ($2,043 - $2,541) position is also proposed to be transferred from the Construction Management Division to provide support for the professional staff. 3790 - Construction Management One additional Senior Engineer ($4,342 - $5,645) position is proposed to be added mid-year to supervise the increasing construction activities at Plant No. 1. A new position of Chief Construction Inspector ($3,615 - $4,699) is proposed as a reclassification for an existing Principal Engineering Associate ($3,615 - $4,699) position, at no change in salary level, to more properly reflect the nature of the work and supervision performed. As a part of the £ormtion and development of the new Electrical, Instrwrentation and Control Division, it is now appropriate to transfer several existing positions from this Division into the new Division to properly reflect the work being done and the reporting relationships. Accordingly, the following transfers are proposed: one Engineer ($3,893 - $5,061) position, one Senior Construction _ Inspector ($3,061 - $3,806) position, two Construction Inspector ($2,800 - $3,482) positions and one Engineering Aide I ($2,043 - $2,541) position. GGS:lc DMM5.22-35 t I t B fl 'COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ' 8 EXIST NGWIM1' [ SUMMARY ORGANIZATIONAL CHART AFTER MIDYEAR CHANGES aoure of ouserow vncurnE wEcsu wu�rt+eE wsEmnEc OEXE0.LL w WXWEa i 1 E 5 4LY OP E O E p 6EtY 101 6'Y OIIQCIOaR Wlpm� MFO EUNO11f -EFgMT' -P1YadL � /9iRYR EafEIY RM1SdOIB se aw n YNRENVICE BR2Y9 pgRYOPOi OINEOIq+OF OAKRONOF ppECl011 vwawE orvwirowa ncxxrx ov •ux+auett EEaxEee EwniEwxo +a YYuOF o of ¢C WIMWH ErowEG OIaAE OF eM' WiFAw YMYOw �9Ecv �M Rw nvvea PIOLIaEa sxwae+ +e a m ss a w x a s a u a a a -IEY NCs -Ml9E OPEA FK' la aeCW1.REV9E c0.. sOF9ox eP1aR IpVf u—uwn =.A oI a Fiuwwa wriu�Ea vi�waaw Fiiwinw vi+wiaw wxuFn a aE+ieE �o^ 9� m 9 1 1 t 1 d 1 t 1 1 I I I 1 I ( 1 1 1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY PAGE 1 SUMMARY ORGANIZATIONAL CHART 101-02 PwPOSm BOlape mRecmRe ewcume eeeDva YYIREE COMMRKK eM ..IRWNWER e i BECY OF E OFFICE COUNCIL BOMO CHI" .I. *NY KgpHHp. OOY pigEt]OP A44eigIR IHIO OVPPoRi 9ECURTI I.YROLL PRIHCIPIL RRINGPFI MILLM! KRBOHM6 gDMIN ROMIN WAY WPEgIIBOR YIHgER DAYAox NOe] eB WINIE"NCE BERNCW DIRECTOR OIRfCIOROf ?KCTOq OI pIRECfoq 01 OPEW1gHB! p ECMHIC/L O FlN.WC! I.WMCINNCL BERVICA ENOIXCCRIXO m e f u Y] ] B N%ggr KCIY YM'/-0Eq 11KC.OMB KCY IMERX9 FINMEEq DIR fO Of Bf INIWIB KCY INIFAHB le A >0 B 1e ]f e -qEV BVCB -WWC OPG YTCP I.IC RII..RCUK COXTRCL OVILIY •OEBgX ...R YOYTK COAMBONmIb!l�bER YNXbRCLR OETBUONIbE• C„LbRIES f�bbK OA.W ON R.10!] fYFN.NCR fMRxtllR 0M0.XNC PEgbWb FAV OA]1B4 HPblIt�bE ROV ER �w0A0UGH PbCIO YINbER N1 2 I W1A2 w oFNEnr ------------- 1 M ' w o IFIF rE IFE TOR IN w w BECV OExEWI Iaulx�ss w�.Xa I wr w RIN Y 1 Mr 'Yrt RN, w w RRT. M¢ alo r. WN 6fcPAMY 181 w ERR roue � rs 727 w CtEIU NOE CIFAN i:w iosfi iyEi RON aEnx amx euuu w Iw aXMD E A_ 1.0]mn INXNC NORN3ENMCE EERY . NE RI lir^NOi OPONigW iECxNKY � E FNNICE BEPVIC[H IXEEPI OX PIO OX P.WE. ON PILE I3 OM PI.OE IE Y{ r xu]cL PAQE3 oerulr4wr ]YYi-03 a _ OIRCCiOR01 - IIHYICL 1 ]a0 R e ttERKN IIN.WC! KCOYNfIHO GgNCG .WO RIMIU! Y9E VL 4WxOw COMRyLp1 ...WR L= GI! ]000YMI � MWROER MC wPORW BPECNL LFANLtleK IMO OENCRLL I GG Eln Reure wwu 4CCOVMNM wOORW4w IHPO WIV O r1 WILYR IN]LYR Ia] 1 Ma 4p cop eLNpR U ICCOYM.IM ILC OYMNR OYMNT NT NT NT CCouM ILCOYMYII Ixroevice 1 uoe 1 ]ea mooR.w4w iecxx ] ] uxloR eNc ]III oew NII eurw R.. � NRRNN I as Plx.N1 � O0.VNCe T[CXMICNN WYw COOROWxiOR ] � I Mq IENIOR EO41N. RORINIEEIER � KCRE]IAY ] ]O IMO Me alo I al iE<nxpYx T.cxxpux e um 1 TECNNpNxI OgYxpe iCCXNpNX IECRRIRY M!E e �r M.]{C .ICCiO M./.CRO aG ! aCN I cLIRX !tteRx CLERK Oae I ] RL! 21 4aE WINCR aN E N /LCOYMINO RCCOVMIM aNpR ttwx aw« ttwx� amx _ ] I aEI 1 Wf L LW 4EE ] � awx awx 0 a1P oREeXEEnNo NARRM rtReR o lo]rvxR e e4xR OPERATIONS a PAGE 4 MAINTENANCE IW1-82 Oil DIRECTOR OF OPEfl d MTCE + )eB6 12) "1 A551 p110F A TMR OF OPERATIONS YNNTENPHCE eaw e4Ba SRFN RR1 9 Y HAAER 0 BeeB PLWT oFm e a v ee at ro zs a+ TE PIANf WLLL9188 NO.1 NO3 TRVNINO CIERCAL W]ER1S BIIPPoIif YNNTENANLE FACLRIES YEOWIIGL EIKIflCNE E E IHSfg1YENf MIIEi d11EF TRNNINO N)MIN INTEPNB SP FAQ FADL FA0. FN% FMA OPERATOfl OPERATOR 8UPN1 8E4Y ENOR YOR YOR (ij YOR MOO DETAI SWPAOEE DE]NLSOMPME6 DETA4SON PAGE] OP7dASrE— PAGES MAINTENANCE I99I-62 0]1 I OPER a MTCE ]1B5 12J 21] ASS A I OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE 1 1 e0B0 8383 B A A CLERICAL INTERNS SUPPORT SENIOR G ENGINEER PREPAR COORD 5815 Se45 ENGINEER I _ we1 ASSOCIATE IN I AL ENGINEER ENVIRON SPEC t 1 MM «M A A ENGINEER SECY 2Tae 1 1091D n14 ENGINEER AIDE 11 1O80G 2816 INTERNS SECRETARY B t 16.00IHR MAX AIDEI 10511A 2559 1 1058 2611 SE NIOR CLERK 2 1056F 221e CLERK 2 1051E 2013 PAOEB MAINTENANCE twt-B2 3>1 OPER d MTCE 1 � TAB5 2T 21T 28 �LEKIUAUINILKNb OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE 4TECH SUPPORT 1 1 830.9 83p3 ♦ 5 128 OPERATIONS O) 73 B PIT NO.1 NO.2 CH EF C RP OPERATOR OPERATOR 5019 611p A I SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR 8 p 0234 0230 42U SENIORUMP POW PLANT OPER PLANT OPER OPERATOR PLANT OPER 12 1< 2 2081D 331D 2081D 3910 2081D W10 20810 3910 ti PUNT PLANT OPER OPER OPER 16 20 3 2088 2888 20" 2888 2088 2888 (8 OPERATOR IN TRAINING IN TRAINING w 2 B 2055C 2388 2055C 2388 QNTRL ENTER CLERK CLERK 6 0 2060D 2268 206/D 2255 y PIT CONT w CENTERCLERK 0 B.=HR iIT o -� a _i I - a C� uux�ENnNce PAGE[ tYYt-Y3 A m or MewNc A u a N m YWNER IK YYYOG IKYOb YµIpLR IK YWNER IK YY4pLR q/ML YKE YLCNINK.IL CMLLCiaN [LLCIRpII NRRVYGi1iaN 1 I fpf ORKIONIb!) OL)W OXIb[L OLi.W ONIbf10 O IKEII a u fu Rw rfxo wRLwN � LINE KMMM YIC[ CLENWO IIVYIR w 1 LEN COLL LMCOLLIK WOR G a ! M[f M COLLEC)ION KW4 M® • 9N r co .Mm rb wumaNrK WORNGY WORNIR II ) %YE SON ANL 9W ECLLWNON IK WORNGI WONEIRl OOON 4 IlW iOON I I)EO Yux[xuK( PAGE 6 1M1A2 ENNCE 1 � iRfKYOF9 L KW qWR qYR Mt! <[LLECOOx YECwMLM 6ECiRKM WIRWEM 310 OAYIOx OAW Ox DA.LL90N Iq(Ilx urt04g1 qYY xO] UEC fRp MlfpN [.DYA[T/ E>A E>A (oR(iY.x fORFWX vFYYRv SECOxpMv OWRCOMR0. pEwx]ERMi RAVI➢ Y80N0 WYgv [OMPX OLVRIWND lAD . lGD I LFq Lfq YLCwxt YKxfMC YE[WMC YF[xgC Y[CNYq Y[CxYwC YECwYt YLCxWK KCXfM YE[xWK Ne]o] xNm ma ]iafof v]a DID YEC YEC]MNK fR Yf<xWK M.YL<xxNC M.YECxY1K w¢➢EN MYLCxYF -I-- K IEC RYE[WXK 9P KCxxxK DR YECiuN SOSSI' 30i } SNSf ]W> iN[i' 1tl} 333fi idl ]93f' 0(LRx}OR ]ONE i 1fA YEC]YMC YK]YNK YfCLUYC 11EbYN0 YLCxRxK YLtwlt YECwK K Y[[IYNC YE6YN[ ]41ED ]]M 30W 9N ]JNO E[} ]OLO >5}3 ]%[0 aE3 14•IO ]'E[Y ]N[0 LP uxxlEx4icE PAGE rO r W r-GP s 217 Y4MAM/SE X X70 11 iuxtlE iNC4r4B uwW XNxtlF � M<IXIECfpx aERPi[4. M Y W9INWEMNMN 1 6�O 1 6�0 YA490xIME1 OA4BOX1 � [9FRNK4 6FCiWLµ iFyDNLvxpR irt10 EVMxYOR MurtxO] iOPEIUN iOREIYN {ONEYIN iL0 1 VXE16 4F.N 4E90 C CTT 6£Ci C. aLCf1LCX flt Cri EC" M Lo9r.. 1 reu xov. 1 rnE � TMHi TECH rE' — xm., r ria rev.. r r.a rov.9 r.r, remn r.a EI T..1 Ll£CfxC4 aECrXC4 re<x� r 9 row am m». rve m aERxc4 ¢LRxc4 YNXICI4NCE 4W ENYCEIYN XuxfExWCE WN 1 r61G 1 %M Melt 1 _ s -� nnn TECHNICAL PAGE 12 SERVICES 1991-92 128 DIRECTOROF TECH SERVICES 1 7495 2 9 CLERICAL INTERNS PIT INTERNS _ S ADMINISTRATIVE 1S W/HR MAX SECRETARY 1 IWID 201a SENIOR CLERK 1 1058F 2208 CLERK 0 r 1050E 2013 1A 5 5 09 OS COMPLIANCE CONSERVATION, AIR LABORATORY SOURCE RECLAIM S REUSE QUALITY CONTROL COMPLIANCE CONSV,RECLAM AIR QUALITY LABORATORY SOURCE CTRL �. MANAGER AREUSE ADMIN MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER 1 1 1 1 t SIBS 580E 5865 5910 5198 OETAILSON DETAILSON DETAILSON DETAILSON DETAILS ON PAGE t3 PAGE to PAGE t] PAGE tS PAGE16 TELNRIUL PAGE 19 SERVICES INI-92 e gRELTOR OF 1E01pERVIL44 e 6 6 p e C C4NSEWATJON, Nfl WAYfY LCYPLWILE UBpNTgry 80URCE WEM 6 YIfEW19 RELLW 6 MUSE YNIALFYFM LORIflOt CIX18V.flECWA Nfl WKRV CLYPLWILE IABpUTOIry BCURCE CSflL $REUSE ADtlIN MNNOER MANAGE. YNNOEfl MNUOEfl 1 I $M$ Wb pIPo N1� plpp OETNL9 LR CFfNL5IX1 YETNIH dI OESNLSOX UEfNL90N PNIE Ip PNSE 11 PNlE fi PNSE t6 PNSE IS WNIry E CLEPoCK >39CIWKE SCIENCE COYPLWICE LOYPLURLE wPERNSOP wPERNSOfl I ueI ON, %YNLIPµ PwxGPAI A94 -E ENVNBPEC ERNR SPEC ERGIREER MM M4 SE M E—RSPEC t IS160 1. FNNR8PEC 11 E SPEE. IpeJG Alp IMW S]Ip EXVIfl9PECl _ 1 1pRG ]p5> SECREf — IpbpA 15Y SEM CIERK f lbElF yVe CLER( tpYP I AI] Y rECXYIGI PAGE]a SFT9LES IYY]-az Im pfl W CF TECH SEPNLES t ]gym LiOYCN. cpIRW10E IT .W101UL1]V CONSFINAT . UBOINTOM SOUgCE I IWEP MN MWEW PECLAM Amum EprtPOL t CWRMMCE NN WµT' CONSV.PECLAY• UBgNTOR/ 8 MECM YNIIOQI YNIMEfl fl MAWIWWRATOfl YNUOEfl YNIMFA t !im I W6 I 6M6 I YII� t IIW OETNLe p1 pETNLSON OETNL80N GETNL90H pE]NLBq! PME I] PME t] PMF Il PM3E 16 PAOE tt PNNLIPA, E RSPEC 1 ] 4N BECPEfNiY mIYA t 'AS! 1 7 7 1 T � T S PAGE 16 T a u - o � TECNxICAL PAGE 17 MINI 101-92 Im DIIIEDTO MEN IN II _ 1 1AE6 L 6 6 E N CLEWEN. COYRWILEI WNSFINATMMI. /J MEN UBpNTOT' SWflCE A VrtENNB NECUY>NEVBE 4NIMEYEM COMIpI COMPLIANCE I CCNW.RECLNA•1 fld RY LI.BdN— WEREECIeL YNNOEfl PEVBEADMIN MN GER MNIMEfl YNUOEN t E�W t 6M6 t 5'I] 1 YIN I LIM DETNLBCN BEINLB ON 8EfM80N DETNL80x pETNL80N PME R PACE O PAOE D ME 16 PNiE 1G 1 1 1 CLERM WLE8A9 "T PERMIT PEBEANGI• U/PNNING ADYIN VEG RKL ENGINEER ENGINEER K!1 RLt MENRV I WP ,TBBoc AuoC vwxavrl ExDINEER ENGINEER ENWION BPEC D o a A4T ANA YM BECPETMV IDEW t 35Y ENGINEERING PAGE IB 1221—p2 n DIREarofl of ENOINEEWNO iW6 � a a z• e o CLERICAL INTERNSPIAXNMO ElEOT.IN81fl CON NNI a DE81DH 6LONTROL MANAOEMGEMEM ENOINEEPINO DETNL8 ON DETNL8 ON MNIAO ER PMEIp PApE Ip � 6pp6 m a x TREATMEM LdL S)MEM8 OFFICE NROUKR ENNR PUXfB •PERMRB ENOINEENNO AOMWINOB REVIEW BENIOfl e� ENOINEEfl 1 Li EM6 ENGINEER ENGINEER EM EER 1 e0el eppl WI PRNCIPAL PRINCIPAL PPoXCIPK ENGR A89pL ENGR A88OC ENORA880C I I 4M •eW A8p .TE A49OCNTE ENGINEER ENOINEEA x 9 EWR YN ASSOCIATE ENOINEERNG IATE I IATE Iowa ]pp] A86 1.0 me SENIOR BER ENGR NDE ENOflMDE tOGF x•e2 t0e•F Met _ ENOINE£RNO ENOINEERNO ENOINEERNO EHGIXEERNO NDE III NGE III NDEIII NGE I11 6 p 10aPE a0p0 tOexE ]OW 1082E ]OR IORE a0W H M1NE SECRE ECRETNIV FNGINEEWNO FIgINEERNG E NGINEERING ENGINEERING I PR NDE II NOE II NOE II _ IOeID AN IMEPNB 0 IaFpG Ale lae]OAle1e.00MAMN{eECRE AmEEI IOfiA 26M NDEI 2FI OlE1X _ 2 tO6eF YN8 CIER( � 0 PR 1061E Ali A8818iMT e.e01NR ENOWEEFINO PAGE IB pEvurtuFM 1VB1-ex n owEcron of EHOIXEOYXO I N•6 • N 6 .PPOR PVHNWO El CC].WSTM MNAGMENT E BUPPOflf 10E8pN 6CON]PoL MNUOEMFM _ OETNl80N OETNLB pI CONSfIpCfpX PMEIe PN3EU WNAOEN eIN I• to INSPECTXW LOMTIMCT NMIW 6 6 NO,' NO3 INCH M 9ENOFI SENWfl ENOIXEEA ENGINEER ENGINEER 6M6 t 6M6 .6 ENGINEER ENGINEER ENGINEER 3 CHIEF ] Cqt C0NS]W6P qpl 5p61 mNCCONST % CONZ mNCCONR SP INEROR WS OR PECIOR --ECT I 6 ENGR ,V60cWTE . I top)B mn 9R GON6T GII LONG! GRCOKB 6NC . Ix6PEClaa WBPECTg1 WEPECIOR W6PECTOR I p Ioepc 66W IOMC eeoe Ioeec t aeae toeec 6ea6 COXSF COIL4f CCNbT CON4T INSPECTOR WBPECTOR WfiPECTOR W:iECTOR _ x O 3 1WF .2 1061E N62 I.F .2 t6NF • 9Nx Prt CONE( INSPECTOR ENGINEEWNO NN NOE m xt.o. .. x _ HHOE Nw A!IW OONW W6PEC OR 0 ENGWEEWNO FNOMEEWHO 10R0 60]6 NOE II NGE II FNOINEEWNO tOMO t Nt0 t0600 I WIp NGEI Iou I zslt Prt A6MerNrt e.wMRu6x r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY r JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGETS PNLTATION 5e topolitan p OIST'k f o 9e I U a ay N r S+ace 1954 O�gNGE COUP r 1991-1992 FISCAL YEAR r r [ 1 1 I l [ ( f 1 1 [ 1 f 1 1 1 l 1 l 1991-92 Io1R 019.110E IM. UNIT NRILLp 01 IRIYTIOU!XPI.11 Otees ded.M. ...T 11019"1016 BUIDULp R OI (Ol (c) f9) 115 (r) [prod-VI Inv. 0u. To Incr. Cue To Toll n.for OYEpa 1990-9, 0vno. mn.lmn/ le,.w., .-riled Mlar Ir. en. Fur 4ww.M.O [.twat Budget R...seemed to,..Hen OlMao Incr.... a/O.erw 1. Ya Llwlo, sake. t all,2001m t22,109,ow M,{%.0.0 H,600,m0 43"O,OW - OWpebO Costumes lrv.l utnt.LxO no 90 91 Ci.t4p.utMrin!peltlMu T Omellb od"Il.n.l geltlon. All 0.9M1mCE In ores, he Fen p,I.nit, p rappers In.,... ,e*ulot., 9ppll.n9.ptivltl. end ml%.Misdeal, news<tY Intel lld t end Color dust I wn11e1041 eputpwne. 2. Oder fenl-L t m..InL S,Om,LW p,Im,000 (so,=) (SWIM) (S"'wid) - —It— t0 Cment 1.al.rub, cp.r. dust Ieorm.sd alteetq: coagulant I....... lurqu/4uM For Meel..l (Door....I fncr..n/I...I....) t0t9rm. i 013,011113) I—L Y.., n.ml Ill.door..... iW.tm loG %e,o0O Cold In fool .o- CUNdL.eon tnml Lin.s to wntreL e,dpiws wtilde Wild,. Formss Chloride u,00O Central. sulfide* In dig..,.,go. (IWO Auto Ul.t). 1.111. Mission IQ',00O 1M.lut/tm.lcet Ontpnt ter CMancw rise,, olrtlflo grlorvng.. Also ue.d for aulfla, oentml. Hlgsn (20,M) OeUO In ..lid. nmr.L. lLSS0,0gO S. "or...Ion.L 511%,000 2.890.OW 1296,000) 129a.M0) - p0n11.1 .1 .11 <oal.. one cnem9t unl... 1. "ttd. ....I 6,000,00o S,20o'cona 12C0,00O (200,M) - mgn.aed .11.0n, of pen, Cow dl.p.et mnlrwb. .M ll.gwt S. Igulq.% Georges 2O,ow %o,ow "M 5,000 - 1ngn..ld In Fe.e1 Cue, egulgM<. O. lep.ir./RaInl.n .nil I'M o00 S,%o,OW SSS,00o ISS,000 - erosion 1r.,of, ulne*nave.eon respire In MgMM one upgndld 1.ouul.. end 8.mc.a12u9pli.. Cow omr Control pulposnt. 2. 1....rm eon Raliterin, 2,O{,OW 313S3.000 all. 091M - Cddlttwal rep mnitertp muirld. - "IF to, grails, done, 2. utilities 6,uS,000 5,OO,aw 070,000) W,%0 (so wit) - Cesar....Me 1e.11 Feet us.; C.grimg.else use .gulpnnq I.I.H. o sn...11. ". sent. 9. Otnm satellite, wpLln a,III WD 5406.0t, 20,000 21e,030 In,= . Inar.... 1. w9prt planned LL.If W enulpsmt eddlllM.. S Out old. Imtm - Bdul.pn.ttb. and ogrn4p to... 10. Teel hint OFentIM $50,M,000 S3,111,and, 8110731OW t1,%9.N0 12,%4,WO [lows... 11. ...Co. eon Off..,. 12. Oat Joint Writing f{2,cO,000 %0,O1,a00 t OS,OW It,S{9.W0 t2,{L,D]0 [ [ [ [ [ ! JOINT OPERATING FUND BUDGET REVIEW & SUMMARY COMPARISON OF BUDGETED & ACTUAL EXPENDITURES & ESTIMATED CARRY-OVER SCHEDULE I FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 5/9/91 A B C D E F G Budget Recommended Increase Expenditures Estimated Increase EeYd Carry- 1990-91 Budget or 1989-90 Expenditures or Over to Fiscal - 1991-92 Decrease 1990-91 Decrease Year 1991-92 1 Net Salaries, Wages & Benefits $19,286,000 $22,469,000 $3,183,000 $15,845,000 $19,186,000 $3,341,000 $100,000 2 Odor Control & Chemical Coagulants 5,670,000 5,120,000 ($5501000) 4,554,000 4,020,000 ($534,000) $1,650,000 3 Professional & Contract Services 9,194,000 8,698,000 ($496,000) 7,109,000 7,251,000 $142,000 $1,943,000 4 Equipment Charges 245,000 250,000 $5,000 209,000 225,000 $16,000 $20,000 5 Repair & Maintenance Material & Services 3,796,000 3,950,000 $155,000 3,111,000 3,150,000 $39,000 $645,000 6 Research & Monitoring 2,694,000 3,333,000 $639,000 1,902,000 2,378,000 $476,000 $316,000 7 Utilities 6,345,000 5,805,000 ($540,000) 4,950,000 5,100,000 $150,000 $1,245,000 8 Other Materials, Supplies & Outside Services 2,978,000 3,506,000 $528 000 2,655,000 2 873 ODO $216 000 $105 000 9 Total Joint Operating Expenses $50,207,000 $53,131,000 $2,924,000 $40,335,ODO $44,183,000 $3,848,000 $6,024,000 10 Revenue and Offsets 2,600,000 3.100.000 $500 000 2t995.000 2,768,000 $227 000 168 000 11 Net Joint Operating $47 607 000 $50 031 000 $2 424 000 11 $37 340 000 $41 415 000 $4 075 000 $6 192 ODO Schedule II BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 5/9/91 JOINT OPERATING FUND Fiscal Year 1991-92 ALLOCATION OF JOINT OPERATING EXPENDITURES A B C D E F G H I J GALLONAGE FLOWS 1991-92 Funding 1990-91 COMPARISON 1990-91 Estimated Estimated District Flows Estimated 1991-92 Percent District Estimated Required District Required No. Past Yearl Increase Flows of Total Contribution Carryover Funding Contribution Funding 1 9,856.07 MG 280.00 MG 10,135.07 MG 10.10% $ 5,051,000 $ 625,100 $ 4,425,900 $ 4,854,000 $ 4,169,100 2 30,611.49 600.00 31,211.49 31.09% 15,555,000 1,925,200 13,629,800 14,931,000 12,824,100 3 31,504.40 300.00 31,804.40 31.68% 15,851,000 1,961,700 13,889,300 15,096,000 12,965,700 5 4,814.85 100.00 4,914.85 4.89% 2,450,000 303,200 2,146,800 2,376,000 2,040,700 6 5,422.76 50.00 5,472.76 5.45% 2,728,000 337,600 2,390,400 2,670,000 2,293,200 7 7,706.74 0.00 7,705.74 7.68% 3,840,000 475,300 3,364,700 3,680,000 3,160,700 11 6,301.33 0.00 6,301.33 6.28% 3,140,000 388,700 2,761,300 2,975,000 2,555,200 13 640.13 0.00 640.13 0.64% 319,000 39,500 279,500 307,000 263,600 14 2,200.79 0.00 2,200.79 2.19% 1,097,000 135,700 961,300 718,000 616,700 TOTALS 99 056.56 MG 1,330.00 MG 100 386.56 MG IO0.fflE_jL$ 50 031 000 6 192 000 $ 43,839.000 $ 47,607,000 $ 40,889,000 r JOINT WORKS OPERATING BLOGET SCHEDULE III JOINT OPERATING 6 WOR4KINO CAPITAL FCNOS 5/6/91 1991- FISCAL YEAR 1988-89 1989-90 199P91 199 1 1991-92 r ACTUAL ACTUAL PRDOECTBO BUDGET RECOINEND 1. SALARIES 5 WAGES 14,574.663 17.344,316 20.962,000 21.229.ODO 23,996.O00 (a) "^ 2. RETIREMENT 1,961.706 2.370,89T 2,464.000 3,035.ODO 3.513.000 (a) 3. WORKERS CAT 134.000 155.000 15S.000 155.000 180,000 (a) 4. UNElPl.OR1ENT INAF6NCE 6.155 21.295 25.000 2S,OOD 30.000 (a) S. CROP INSURANCE 1,193.644 1.637,345 - 1,924.00O 1,758.000 2,460.000 (a) S. UNIFORM RENTAL 69.191 71.946 84,000 84.000 90,000 (a) 7. TOTAL BENEFITS 3.364.596 4.266,483 4,652.ODO 5.057.000 6.2FJ.000 (a) B. SALARIES. WAGES, 6 BENEFITS 17.939,259 21.600,799 26.614,ODO 26.286.000 30.259.000 r 9. DIRECT CHARGES-CORF/DIST (2.6S2.3BD) (3.271.131)(3,615.000) (4.000.000) (4,300,000) 10. DUST ALLOC-CORF/DIST (1.832.420) (2.484.310)(2,813.000) (3.000.000) (3,500,000) II. N.O. SALARIES 6 BENEFITS (4,4UM.600) (5,755.441)(6,428.000) (7.000.000) (7.80D.000) (b) r 12. NET J.O. PAYROLL 13.454.459 15.845.358 19,186,000 19,286.000 22.469,000 (e) r 13. MATERIALS. SUPPLIES. 6 SERVICES 14. GASOLINE. DIESEL 6 OIL 220.292 177.OB4 200.000 250.000 250.000 (6) r 15. INSURNCE 553,131 586,029 588.000 600.000 60D.000 (¢) 16. MEMBERSHIPS 15.3190 17.B 20.000 30.000 30.000 M r 17. OFFICE EXPENSE r 18. SPPLIES 92.067 11019W 140.000 120.000 165.000 (9) 19. DINER 62,795 791920 91.000 65.000 110.000 (9) r 20. OPERATING SUPPLIES 21. CHLORINE 5 DOOR CONTROL 1.956.235 1.759,940 1,700.000 2,400.000 2.300.000 (h) r 22. SULFIDE CONTROL 555.403 618.067 720.000 9DO.ODO 690.000 (h) r 23. CHEMICAL COAGULANTS 2.062.6413 2.175.649 1.600.000 -2.370.000 1.930.000 M 24, LAB CHEMICALS 6 SUPPLIES 138.529 1931255 210.000 16610DO 294.OD0 Cj) r 25. TOOLS B2.419 DO.595 95.000 95.000 115.000 U) M. SOLVENTS, PAINTS. 6 344. SU.PPLIE 99.S1B 118,490 140.000 150.000 170.000 (j) r V. Of11ER OPERATING SUPPLIES 163.105 2D4.217 184.000 215.000 215.000 Cj) r W JOINT WORKS OPERATING BLOGET SCHEDULE III JOINT OPERATING & k ING CAPITAL FINDS 5/6/91 1WI1 FISCAL YEAR 60 1988-89 1989-90 MO 1990-91 1991- ACIURL ACTLAL PROJECTED 0 ET RECL14'END W M. CCITRACTU4L SERVICES y 29. GROLMO51(EEPING 44.618 57.202 62.000 125.000 IOO.OW (k) 30. OUTSIDE LAB SERVICES 115.711 89.754 - 117.000 404,000 160.000 (k) W 31. SOLIDS RE OVAL AND DISPOSAL 4.653.932 5.696.353 5,200,000 6.000.000 5.800.000 (k) W M. OTHER WASTE DISPOSAL 25.23E 3.968 180,000 190.000 250.000 (k) M. ONYGBR PLANT OPER 8 MICE 0 0 400.000 420,000 459.000 (k) 4Y 34. OTHER 273,394 4FA.480 360.000 778.000 7SO,ODD (k) M. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES W W. GENERAL. LABOR & SPECIAL COUNSEL 326.028 SSI.485 60D.000 650.000 650.000 (1) I � W 37. RIAIT & ACCOUNTING 22.621 24.628 25.000 27.000 53.000 (1) M. ENGINEERING 8.231 22.713 62.000 75.000 75.000 (1) j 39. OTHER 175.6% 192.2E3 225.000 525,000 410,000 (1) y 40. PRINTING & P18LICATION W 41. REPRO-IN� 95.683 116.882 II0,000 140.ODD 150.000 (m) 42. PRINTING TSIDE 29.247 63.373 70.000 100.000 100.000 (m) W 43. PHOTO PROCESSING SS.B 26.347 26.000 25.000 30.000 (m) 1 W M. NOTICR & A% 59.284 78.781 95.000 85.000 110.000 (m) 45. RENTS & LEASES W 46. OUTSIDE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 71.237 93,232 105.000 120,000 120,000 (n) 47. DISTRICT EQUIPMENT RENTAL 113.972 135.442 120,000 125,000 130,000 (n) W 48. REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE Ii 49. MATERIALS 3,24I.500 2,948.428 3.000,000 3.600.000 3.700.000 (0) W SO. CONTRACTS 71,767 362.590 150.000 1%,000 250.000 (0) V 51. RESEARCH & MONITORING i 52. OCEAN MONITORING 2,314.126 1.667,061 2.000.000 2.104,000 1.970.000 (P) V i 60 JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUOGET SCHEDULE III JOINT OPERATING 6 WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS 5/6/91 1991-92 FISCAL YEAR r _ 198�89 I989-90 199p)1 199 1 1991- AC)WL ACTUAL PROJECTED BUDGET RECOMMEND W. OCEAN/I.W./OPER RESEARCH 196,524 234.634 378,000 590.000 1.363.000 (P) r U. TRAINING. MEETINGS, 6 TRAVEL G2,074 102.065 ]55.000 175.000 210.000 (4) �. S5. tMCOLLECTABLE ACJOUNTS 257 241 0 2.OD0 2,000 (Y) W. UTILITIES r 57. DIESEL FOR GENERATORS 107,911 104.661 200.000 200.000 200,000 (g) Se. POWER 4,446.142 4.S38.S88 4,440,000 5.700.000 5,000,000 (e) r 59. NATURAL GAS 123,930 66.834 2DO.000 17S,0D0 300.000 (97 re SO. TELEPHONE 103.351 3031OD4 IOO,DOD 120.000 125.000 (e) 61. WATER 102.ISO 136.708 160.OD0 150.000 I80.OD0 (9) rr 62. OTHER EXPENSES 63. FREIGHT 41.283 38,973 35.000 45.000 45.000 M r 64. GENERAL 271.927 296,436 3301000 300,000 350.000 M .65. AGAR OPERATING FEES 67,33D 176,334 210.000 3001000 3501000 M 66. PRIOR YEARS EXPENSE 250.618 14S,2D9 125.000 50.OD0 15010D0 (U) '67. OTHER NON-0PERATING EXPENSE 46,411 40,688 S0.0D0 46.000 60.000 Cv) 60. TOTAL MATL, SUPPLIES, 6 SERVICES 23,S02.855 24.486.726 24.997,000 MIMI.= 30.6621000 r 69. COST ALLOCATION-OORF 6 OTHER (359.096) (615,502) (SOO.0007 (6001000) (600.000) (W) .70. NET J.O. MAT'L, SUPPLIES, 6 SEA 23.144.757 23,873.234 24,497,000 30.3211000 30.062.000 Cx) 71. REVENUE (2,103.397) (2.3 .468)(2,268,000) (2,ODO,000) (2.500.000) (Y) .72. NET 3.0. EXPENOITURES 34,495.829 37,339.114 41,416,000 47,607,000 50.031.000 (1) r r r r r r May 15, 1991 SCHEDULE IV r NOTES TO JOINT OPERATING FUND BUDGET 1991-92 FISCAL YEAR r (a) Salaries. Waves and Benefits - See attached Schedule V for ,r 1991-92 salaries and benefits estimates and projected payroll savings. Estimated 1990-91 salaries and benefits are below budget primarily because delayed construction schedules allowed positions to remain vacant. (b) Cost Allocations and Direct Chargebacks to CORP and Individual Districts - Represents direct labor and benefits chargebacks and cost allocation to the appropriate fund for which the work is actually performed (CORF for work on treatment plants' capital expansion; respective Capital Facilities funds for work on individual District's collection facilities capital expansion; and Operating funds for ..� maintenance and repair) . Also reflects administrative time chargeable to self-funded insurance programs; and Source Control Division and Laboratory Division charges to respective r Districts for industrial waste monitoring and enforcement program. (c) Net JO Payroll - This line item represents the net salaries, r wages and benefits chargeable to Joint Operating Fund for administration and maintenance/operation of the joint works facilities, after chargebacks to other funds for services performed by the labor pool described above in (b) . (d) Gasoline. Oil and Fuel - This account includes gasoline, oil and diesel fuel required to operate stationary treatment plant equipment as well as approximately 300 pieces of major mobile equipment such as vehicles, cranes, etc. .„ (a) Insurance - Includes Board and staff out-of-county travel policy, employee fidelity bond, all-risk (earthquake and flood) policy, fire, boiler and machinery policies. The major elements of this account are $326,000 for $35 million in coverage provided by the comprehensive all-risk policy and $258,000 for in-lieu premiums to increase the reserve levels in the self-insured public liability fund pursuant to the Boards' decision to fully self-insure liability risk. (f) Memberships - Districts' memberships in Association of ,r Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) , California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA) , Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency (SARFPA) , Long Beach Safety Council and r WateReuse. (g) Office Expense - This account includes supplies, forms, small office equipment, drafting materials; technical journals and .. postage for all departments. r r Schedule IV Page 2 r (h) Chlorine S Odor Control Chemicals - The Districts presently use chlorine, and sodium hydroxide (caustic soda) as primary odor control chemicals in the treatment plants. Usage of ` chlorine is expected to remain at 1990-91 levels during the year but unit prices are budgeted to increase at the next bid date. Caustic soda use in the foul air scrubbers at both r plants however, is expected to increase over 25% as new scrubbers have been placed into service. Caustic soda is also added to trunklines to control hydrogen sulfide in the lines, and $280,000 has been added to the chemical budget for the Joint Works' share of this expense for the in plant odor control benefits. r Ferrous chloride use, required to control hydrogen sulfide levels in our digester gas as required by AQMD Rule 431. 1, will decrease slightly, partially as a result of increased +r ferric chloride for physical/chemical treatment. During the course of this year, we will experiment to optimize use of the various odor control chemicals, but expect our •+ overall usage levels and budget requirements to remain high as we maintain compliance with increasingly stringent air quality regulations. However, as we gain more experience with new systems and covered facilities, we have been able to reduce the budget levels by decreasing our allowances for contingencies. r (i) Chemical Coaculants - We expect that the increased cationic polymer usage levels in 1991-92 will result in an increase of $60,000 for the material. Polymer is added to the influent r wastewater along with ferric chloride via the physical/ chemical treatment systems at both plants to improve solids � . removal efficiencies in the primary clarifier basins. It is r also added to digested sludge prior to dewatering to cause the sludge to coagulate to improve the sludge and water separation process. r Ferric chloride is used as a backup chemical in the event the primary chemical distribution systems are out of service for repairs or maintenance, but primarily for enhanced primary physical/chemical clarifier performance. Physical/chemical r treatment systems were fully installed and operational at both plants this past year, and we expect to increase our actual use of ferric chloride in these systems by 20%. A portion of ferric chloride costs are included in the odor control chemical category to account for this additional benefit from its use. r Anionic polymers are used in conjunction with the ferric chloride for advanced physical/chemical treatment. The actual use of this chemical is expected to increase 30% next year, to ` provide longer operating hours for this process. r r Schedule IV Page 3 (j ) Other Ooerating Suoolies - Miscellaneous items such as scrubber acids, activated carbon, solvents, cleaners, hardware, janitorial supplies, tools, laboratory supplies, etc. required to operate and maintain existing and expanding facilities. $100,000 of the budget increase is to provide chemicals and supplies for the new laboratory to be completed in 1991-92. (k) Contractual Services - The major component of this category is sludge removal and disposal. Contracts have been executed _. with Recyc Inc. , Pima Gro and Curti Enterprise for agricultural reuse of residual solids. Since the closure of the Coyote Canyon landfill, no replacement site for sludge disposal has yet been approved within the county. A total of $5.8 million has been budgeted for solids removal and disposal. This account also includes appropriations for groundskeeping services, toxics removal services, outside laboratory services, trash pickup, plant site sweeping, data processing system maintenance and support services, temporary help to level out periodic increases in staff workload and staffing levels, a maintenance and operations contract for the Plant 2 oxygen generation plant, and the Districts' share of the costs of the county's household and small business toxic disposal center. r (1) Professional Services - Includes General Counsel, special labor counsel, CPA audit and miscellaneous accounting, data processing, engineering and other consulting services. (m) Printing and Publications - Budget allows for in-house and outside reproduction costs and reflects expanded management information system and increasingly complex administrative requirements, as well as continuing demand by public and regulatory agencies for information on Districts' activities. .+ The continuing efforts of our Public Information Program to improve our public education program on Districts' activities is also reflected in the increased budget for this line item. This account also includes costs of advertisements and notices in our continuing effort to recruit quality staff to meet master planned objectives. (n) Rents and Leases - This account includes cost accounting system charges to the Joint Operating Fund for Districts-owned equipment, and outside equipment rental for major equipment used for emergency repairs. The 1991-92 allocation has been increased slightly to reflect the increased usage levels of large equipment required over the past several years to support major repairs and maintenance in our upgraded and expanded facilities. r Y.I Schedule IV Page 4 to (o) Repairs and Maintenance - This item, which is for parts and services for repair of plant facilities, reflects an authorization to allow for routine equipment maintenance. w Should this level of allocation prove to be insufficient in the event of major unexpected equipment failures and/or repairs, a transfer from the unappropriated reserves of the 6.0 individual Districts would be necessary to meet the increased obligation. (p) Research and Monitoring - $1.8 million in this account is for contract services to carry out the extensive ocean monitoring program required by EPA Region IX under the provisions of the Districts' NPDES permit, which became effective April 1, 1985. r The account also includes the Districts' contribution to the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) being conducted under a joint powers agreement with other Southern California municipal dischargers, and also provides 40 for some operational research and evaluation to develop optimum operating parameters in the treatment plants. r (q) Training. Meetings and Travel - Expanding activities of regulatory agencies have required increased Board member and staff travel in recent years. It is expected that r considerable travel will continue to be required in connection with our continued efforts to obtain an extension of our NPDES permit conditions. Also includes ongoing technical l training and materials for staff, expansion of our supervisory ho training program to help provide supervisors with the necessary training to more effectively manage their Divisional groups, and required training for new computerized control •r systems, Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) and other "high tech" equipment, processes and systems. (r) Uncollectible Accounts - For miscellaneous joint Districts' 41 accounts that are determined by the General Counsel and Director of Finance to be uncollectible. ; ; r (a) Utilities - The $5.0 million allocation for purchased power in this item reflects a decrease from 1990-91 budgeted levels due ii to lower than anticipated requirements of additional air ' ' scrubbers, electric motors at the new Ocean Outfall Booster `r Station, and avoidance of peak-demand hours for electrical equipment, and includes the payments to the operator of our ) interim co-generation facilities. r' (t) Other Operating Expenses - Expenses not chargeable elsewhere, such as freight and miscellaneous items, and annual permit renewal fees and penalties assessed by the SCAQMD. r Schedule IV Page 5 ..r (u) Expenses Applicable to Prior Years - Represents adjustments to an operating or non-operating account balance from previous years. (v) Other Non-Operating Expenses - Miscellaneous items not chargeable elsewhere. (w) Cost Allocation and Direct Chargebacks to CORF and Individual Districts - For materials, supplies and services cost allocation and chargebacks for same purposes as described above under (b) . (x) Net JO Materials. Supplies and Services - This line item represents the net materials, supplies and services chargeable to the Joint Operating Fund for administration and maintenance and operation of the Joint Works Facilities, after chargebacks to other funds. (y) Net Revenues - Budget amount is for sales of various sewage treatment process by-products, revenues from the wastehauler disposal facilities at Plant No. 1, sampling chargebacks to individual Districts, and miscellaneous items. (z) Net JO Requirements - This line item represents the net Joint Operating Requirements after reduction of the Total Joint Operating Requirements by the revenues generated from sale of by-products, charges to other agencies, and other miscellaneous operating revenues. V ref:BUDGET91/JONOTE91. 1-5 .r r r SCBE•DEME V May 1, 1991 JOINT OPEPATIIIG FUND (ARD WOMUM CAPITAL REVOLVING FUMID) PFME)CTED SALARIES & ARNRFTIC 1991-92 A B C m Maaimim Anticipated At Full "Paymll Rarramended Employffent Eklclqet Savinqs" Budget SALARIES & WAGES 26,662,000 2,666,000 23,996.000 ve RRNEFTfS: 1. Retirement 3,903,000 390,000 3,513,000 "tl 2. Workers' Compensation 180,000 0 180,000 3. Uneuployment Insurance 30,000 0 30,000 4. Group Medical - Self-Funded (includes transfers) 2,195,000 219,000 1,976,000 - BND 392,000 39,000 353,000 - Disability 83,000 8,000 75,000 - Life 62,000 6,000 56,000 5. Uniforms 100,000 10,000 90,000 6. Total Benefits 6,945.000 672,000 6,273,000 TOTAL SALARIES, WAGS & BENEFITS 33,607,000 3,338,000 30,269,000 NOTES: 1) Salaries & Wanes - The full omploysent projection is based on the assumption that all 670 authorized permanent positions and the 37 Sumer Work Program positions are filled as set forth in the personnel recce uendations. Because of our ability to sometimes tenporarily mininuze staffing by adjusting plant .+ operational Andes, personnel turnover and strict controls on filling vacancies, we have targeted our payroll cost at $30.3 million next year which reflects a "payroll budget savings" of $3,338,000. If, however, turnover and vacancies are lower than anticipated, it may be necessary to allocate additional funds from the unappropriated reserve accounts of the individual Districts. S� v 1 ! 16 Page 2 L 2) Benefits - The remarks above under Salaries and Wages regarding full — employment of authorized positions also apply to benefits. (a) uat'i,�.o^r - The Districts' employees axe mmrbers of the Orange County W Employees Betirea :nt System pursuant to our MlU's. The current contribution rate is 15.31%, which includes 4.50% of the individual's contribution in accordance with the meet-and-cunfer process in lieu of yl a salary adjustment. (b) Workers' Compensation - Includes total estimated expenditures for the workers' compensation program set forth in detail in the enclosed Workers' Covpensation Self-Insured Fund Budget on Schedule VI. An appropriation of $180,000 is recommended for 1991-92 to maintain the I � current level of accumulated reserves, as the number of employees and v potential claims increase, (c) Unemployment Insurance - The Districts are on an actual claim haaie r.1 which results in an overall lower cost because of favorable claims L history. Because claims are beginning to rise, a smell increase in the appropriation is reccumended. I (d) Gtam Med;ral - Includes the Districts' share of employee medical plan L benefits for the prepaid BED plans, the estimated portion of the total costs of the self-funded itdmpity plan not paid for by employees, and L the life and disability insurance premiums. Schedule ViI details the expected costs of the self-funded plan. The recommended budget increase reflects on- increased staffing level as well as increased costs. b (a) Uniforms - This budget projection is for uniforms provided cur field 'y and lab employees in accordance with employee "Is. We have again been able to obtain favorable bids for uniform rental, and the unit costs of uniform service have net increased for several years. I � r IV L L' ref:FM/BUDGM1/JOFSM.V-1 L I L JOINT �S OPERATING MOGET WOWERS' �ENSATION SELF-1NSURED FUND SCHEDULE VI I"l-W FISOAL YEM �fty�l 1�1 lwl� 1�1 ESTIMATED RSOOMMENDED PJOGET EWENOITURES 1. Salari". ft� wd �vfiU 17,000 4,M 101000 2. 110.000 1�.IS3 14S,OOO 3. �tr-� &I Servi� 16,000 21.� M,OOO 4. L�l Sarvi� 3,000 0 3,000 S. Prof�i..l S�rvi. =1000 �1251 20.000 6. Wppli" & Other 7.000 11,313 12,000 7. Sub-T�l M,OOO W7,� mo,000 8. E� � �licy 35.CDO W.259 �,000 9. T�l Ex�ditu,. 2181000 244,136 257,000 REVENUES & RESERVES 10. ln-Li� Prmium m.000 ISS.000 1w,000 11. ln�r� & mi�llm�ua 6�31000 7i'm 77.� 12. T�l P�v. 218,000 257.� 13. E. ��. (E.�ditur.) 0 (17,�) 0 14. �,i�.in, �r� �,000 664.366 W7.00O IS. End.�q �r. �,000 6W.M 637,000 JOINT 1.OPo(S OPERATING EAMET SELF-FUNDED HEALTH PLAN TRUST FUND SCHEDULE VII 1991-92 FISCAL YEAR 9-May-91 - 1%0-91 1991-92 EST. 91-W 1991-92 1990-91 ESTIMATED AT FULL PAYROLL RECOMMENDED EXPENDITURES 9 ET EXPENDITURES EMPLOYMENT SAVINGS E'LOGET 1. Claims - Medical 946.000 1.&52,112 1,962.000 1%.000 1,284,000 2. - Dental I70,000 262,479 275.()00 M.000 241.000 3. Su Total 1,116,000 2,094.591 2.257.M) 2 .000 2.031.000 4. Contractual Services 46,000 55.456 W.000 5.000 45,000 5. SWp Lose Insurance 100.0(D0 76,661 112.000 ll.000 101.000 6. Total Expenditures 11 264.000 2,226,6% 2,419,000 242.000 211n,M) REVENUES & RESERVES 7. In-Lieu Premiums Fran - CSDOC �2.000 760.259 66 W) E6,000 779,000 - Employee 1901000 206.664 224.000 23.000 201.000 O. Interest & Miscellanews 0 5,252 0 0 0 9. ReimWrse fr. Stop Loss Ins. 0 12 AW 0 O 0 30. Total Revenue %2,00D 1,094,663 1.OE* W) 1091000 9R0.000 11. EX m Revenue (EXpendiWres) (262.000) (2,132.035) (I. ODD) (1331000) (1,197.OX 12. Transfers 282.000 1,100,ODD 1,3J0.000 1331000 111W.000 13. E inning Reserves 1%.000 142.524 110.000 0 110.000 14. Ending Reserves 156.M) 110,489 110.000 0 110.000 SFBlA91.%LS-5/9/9I JOINT aOR(S OPERATING BUDGET P LIC LIABILITY SELF-INSLRED FWD SC LE VIII 1991-92 FISCAL YSM 9 Y-91 1990-91 1991-92 1990-91 ESTIMATED RECOMENDED E SNDITL ES B ET E SNDIT ES 6LOGET 1. Salaries. Wages and Benefits 11000 0 1,000 2. Benefits/Claims 20.000 837 20,000 3. Contractual Services 7,000 5,100 7,M) 4. Legal Services 33.000 381220 40,000 S. Profeesimal Services 1,000 0 1,=I 6. Supplies 5 Other 2,000 0 21000 7. Sub Total 64,M) 44,157 71,000 S. Excess Lov Policy 2S5,000 0 265,000 9. Total Expenditures 329,000 44,157 3361000 REVE14U_ES_6. RESEWES 10. In-Lieu Premiums 258.000 256,000 2681000 _ 11. Interest B Miscellaneous 140,000 174,752 190,000 12. Alloeaticn to Dther Funds 0 0 0 13. Total Revenues 3%,000 432,752 446,000 14. Excess Revenue (Expenditures) 69,000 388.595 112,000 IS. Reeervee and Transfers 1,%3,000 1,905.467 2.294,000 16. Ending RePerves 1,9T2.000 Z.Z14,062 2,406,000 PLBlA91.%LS-5/9/91 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY JOINT WORKS CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND PNtTAT/ON olitan 9 � h � K 'S'nce 1954 O�gNGE COVN 1991-1992 FISCAL YEAR ( 1 1 ( 1 1 41 1 ( I ( 1 ( 1 CORF 92A.XLS May-10-91 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SCHEDULE A SUMMARY OF DISTRICT'S REQUIREMENTS AND COMPARISON TO LAST YEAR A B -Q D € 6/30/91 1991-92 BUDGET 1990-91 PRELIMINARY COMPARABLE DISTRICT EQUITY BUDGET BEGINNING BUDGET PERCENT REQUIREMENTS RESERVES REQUIREMENTS 1 9.73% 11,103,000 15,997,000 10,321,000 2 28.59% 32,627,000 73,557,000 29,641,000 3 31.36% 35,788,000 64,070,000 32,330,000 5 4,71% 5,375,000 18,972,000 4,964,000 6 5.57% 6,356,000 8,514,000 5,512,000 7 7.73% 8,821,000 29,408,000 7,798,000 11 6.35% 7,247,000 11,423,000 6,826,000 13 0,44% 602,000 9,796,000 269,000 14 5.52% 6,299,000 (a) 616,000 5,761,000 TOTAL 100.00% 114,120,000 232,353,000 103,422,000 (a) Funds will be provided by required deposits from IRWD CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SCHEDULE 61 SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Pape 1 1991.1992 TO 3000 2001 A 9 C G E F 0 H I J K L MSTRPLAN REVISED TOTAL ESTIMATED REQUIRED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED FIVE E9TIMATEG TEN CGET TO OR B8.90 PROJECT EST C.LP. SUOGET BUDGET SJOOfT BUDGET BUDGET YFAR 9VDGET YEAR C.MEREfE ORIG EST 1981.92 SUNNI 189192 199293 1993-94 1994-95 1995-99 TOTAL 1990.ml TOTAL PROJECTS 1.Now arq flsl J,slaG Major Nolacts A.ReWamW en Rent 1 1.Wdolaolar wap 66amp1e So. PIQT1124 2.1201000 2.0)D,WO E0.000 50.000 So.000 2.Primary Clarflan No..6-1 S.PI 33 40.611.000 45.)00,000 38.200,C0D 4.000.000 600.000 4.500.Wa 4.1141 S.Oas HeMllW FslllUas.A d4.1 13.930.000 14.B50,000 10A6o,0DO 4,000.000 4W.000 4.400.000 4.400.000 4.SIWOa Heralllrr9 Fadfid...Pld42 22500.000 33.000.0D0 30.900,W0 I.100.000 1.100.000 1.100.000 6.DI9aslara 11.10.11 343 35,840,000 26,600.000 3.00D000 12.000.000 6.000.000 3.600.000 33.600,M0 53.500,000 6.FaraA of Dl9eeun 9 A 10,PId5-2 3.6o0.W0 3.900,000 B00,000 3.000.000 1.000.000 100.000 3,1woda 3.100,000 ).=rdaryTmm Exodamon to 60 MGD.PI.36 2I,817. 0 ".80%OOD 2.267,000 3.000.000 I1.000.000 11.000,000 11.533,000 4.000.ODO 37.533,000 37,633.000 9.Ptlmary Traemvnl)2 MOO Expander,Pl d) 35,E00.000 34,100,00D I.N1,e00 1.000.000 10.000.000 10,000.00D Ifl0 '000 559,000 33.059,OW 33.oW,000 B.Mac.Ma619vadan.P1-38 II.OSO,o00 a8,000 600.000 I.OW.000 4.000.000 I,Ml= 9S2.00D ).NEIGGO 3,OW.MO IG,88x000 I0 .6-dW B lardRein.P1 38-1 1.510.000 10,000 6W.000 I'M. 00 1,600,OM I.S00.000 11.EanlpeNs W.*,P1.aB.1 4.920.000 M 2e. D 400.000 2JOG0000 3.000.000 SW.WO 4,900.= 4,SW.000 IS.SNamIC UPOrgIrq S SWet Work.PI 383 2.wO000 ls.lWA00 1001000 1.000.001 4,000.000 4.001 8,000.00O 1,000.000 16.000,WD 15,000,000 13.FuM SWH_lrryrowmanta,R-033 1 17O.00O 86.000 10.000 35.000 36,000 26,000 14.40 MGD Ory9an Act-nail SIW9aS OAPs 65.463.= )OOGOJOOD 5,000.OW 5.000.000 651000A00 16.BNt Pmsaa 14 Until 14,300,Oo0 16.=.= 600.000 2.000.000 B.o00.000 4.500.000 16,OGD,000 I6.000.000 16.Salma.H: 2 Ilo- 10.nL000 11AW.a00 8.000.000 6.000.00D 5.000.00D 1 T.w8aatsn: 2o 110'wsn.Mr 6.100.Oo0 B.SCO.000 1.W0.000 3.300.000 3.200.000 ).400,000 I.sW.WD 8.300.000 19.SUM6y Power Garwrsaan ).)36.00e B,a00,000 2,300.000 6,000.000 9.300,000 8.300.000 20.12ke RamrlaNPew.r w.Ulewlen 3An.aaO a.500p00 loo'coof i.OM.a00 1.600.000 xa00.000 ].9DO.aW xo.Elsvlrincnlon Prolaot 2.100.OW 2.000.00p 600.000 2.000.000 6W.OW 3.000.000 a.OW.oW 21.Rew Sawapa Emalood,By9saa 1.992,e00 x00lm 2.000,000 5.000.000 .No—Trladln6 Flood 1 A 3 1.a00,000 I,e00.000 1.000.000 1,MO.o00 1.000.000 23.Carol All Comprasaol all 350.000 3E0.0O0 SDA00 500.000 150.000 260p00 54.66ao.Project. 10.000A00 10.3W.000 25000D 1.000.000 I.000.Oeo I.M. W 1.000A00 1.000.000 S.M.000 S.M." 10,000.000 SS.OtMr Mnt.r Ran Pnlaals a Morrlmtlrr9 S Co.,.S VIN.,1992 SJ07000D 5,070.000 6,0701000 E.Hsa6wmke No.l Rabald.2W3 14,BW,000 14,BW.000 M,950.000 a.'Nalworka Ne.2 lmpellerMmp Slraa0.2016 2,6W,000 2,M.= 2.M.= 6.Ramow Trlckllno Rlre..254.2W) tAW W,000 1.30DO IAW.. a.40 Mw Oryyen Aol'tl SIUJB.6DAF.W17 14,000.000 34.000.000 34.000.000 1.110 Tt 01 ......SW]63012 111,300,000 1B.2W.0W 18.200.000 9.4 Bell Rems.3004 10.920,000 10.920.000 10,930.000 8.11 KV%war Ofdrlold.,SW 1-2012 1.099,000 Ip99.000 11089.000 L Standby Power Ganeratlon,2005 A 2016 4,914,000 4,914.000 4,614.000 1.TS Mpl Mmaro Tnaannam.2W4 B 2012 225Wo0D 2360HOWD 2350H000 SU6TOTAL RECLAMATION PLANT I 41]385000 4))11S11O00 79 Wa WD 30929 W0 43100000 39600000 N331000 13341000 1))988000 348W 000 SOS)990W 19555]000 CORF9A93.KLS 11 N5 AM SALE, CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND 9CNEOINE EMI SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTON REQUIREMENTS 14 S IEEI-I392 TO MO-2001 A B C D E F O N J R L MSTR PUN RENSEO TOTAL ESTIMATES REQUIRES ESTIMATED fSIINATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED FlVE ESTIMATED TEN COST TO 0R 99" PROJECT EST C.I,P. BUDGET BIpfET BUDGET WDOET BUDGET YEAR E000ET YEAR CdRI6TE ORIO EST 1991.2 S..l 1991-E1 1112-23 1863-94 I..L95 199599 TOTAL 1»0.20S1 TOTAL PROJECTS B,Tuerm.nt 09-12 1...oI F-to-eM SIN,Illo 1. o.Op.,.....&iMI..P1'23'PY1 2,135,OW 2.)SO.ORD WOOD I.500.000 Ip00,000 200,000 2.700.000 2.ro0.00O B E.W.r.Mr.. iTry,PI.]Sl A,950.00D A.0ZOOD 75.000 6W.. S.M.000 SOLOW 5.000.000 4.OW.000 e.MNtt-ne.Build,PSJS] 11W.OW ].5)S.WD 75.000 I,OW.000 2.00O.0W SC0.OW 3.6W.OW ].500.OW S.Comwctien M.rr.9wrxm 0Mc..P23" 1,299,OW 515,000 35,000 300.000 SW.OW WO.OW ..PIw.II SN.S.-INY[Yo..PS 255 3.2W.00O 2]Ob.WO 5.000 IW.WO 1,]W,000 9W,WO S.M= 2.2W.000 t ho... B bp-to P.efum.AS 37 ).162.WO 8.159,W0 8.109.000 60.00D 6O.W0 50AW ].ReM O-::I.J.R.P1.29.1 2.OWAW 5.]WW p1.O {I2.000 A. 0.OW BB9.00O A.9BB.OW A.E89.OW A....d9..ter L.M,IS 392 2.O00000 5.000.00O I,0O0.O0" 4.O00.000 S,WDAW S.OW.WO S.At.dpmNr N.0,113393 S.OW.OW S.O0I 1.O00.O00 4.O00.000 5.O0010O0 S.O0D000 O.To,T-R-no 24 MGDEy AIM,I.P5 11 14.300A00 15.O00.000 I,OW,000 1.000.000 1410.ro,O00 I5.000.000 ).S.co,o.,TI-Roo.E.pxron,13-42.2 10.400.000 S5.2W.000 W 1,000.000 B.O .000 WW 6 IO.O .O .2WW P S.OWW. D 25.2WW.O 25,2W,OW B.EAWpment Prporclo...P2.2-3A 3.000.000 W].O .000 W.. 2.000.000 W 260.O 260.OW SECTOR tow,000 ;eW00 A S.D.ctrikotion Proj.cL P2-A2T 6.60",OW 1I.M.WO I.... 6AW.WD 4.O01S,000 10.000.0,30 IO.WO.OW IO.S-nl....S1N..0 ..Woh.F2�. -I S.O15.W0 31.000 6W.000 1,5000M oiI T'NAW 2.99.,OW 11. min%,UIN,00u,,B Slmct.Woh,P243.2 A.M.= IS.OW000 ISDOW I,000.00O 6.OW.000 5.000.000 2.OW.WO WOODS IA,NDAOO N,9W,OW I2.....Mofiflntiom B O...W...12.3-3 ].520.000 2O.00O I,%O.000 2.O00.O00 a.m.= ].SWAW 1],Monm,tConva snt.m.12.44ISn J 53.11 S,3m WW n.000 A,O , O .00O 2.6WA00 ASSAM twom 2,559.W0 1...1 SW.�n Yrp...mnu.R4332 Iro.000 n5,000 155.000 W,000 WA00 W,WO 1 b.sl.Mbr P..r.r.-Ation 9.200.000 9.500,000 6.2O0,000 8,200.OW 1 S.E...NNNe: 211am 5.200.O00 S.M.000 .WAw 2.40OA00 LAWpW 5.200.000 S.IOO,OW 17....I.o.IOS Fool Pp.nv 3.965.OW W A.O .OW 0 tooto 2.0O0.00 ZOOQ wQ 1 S.P.I.I.WN.r P.InWoon Eya- Z909,000 4,350,0O0 WOOD, 1EMAW 000.00) 3.500.O00 ..]WAW ..3W.W0 19.Pi...Wn..Pomp S.... 1.17O.O0) I.200,000 1.IDOA0" I.100.O00 20.Misc.Pmocts IO.OW.WO IO..W.OW ADD. 1.O00.00O 1,000.OW 1.900.O00 1,000.00G 1,000.O00 600,00ADO S.WOAO0 to.000A00 21..1.1 SAMA,Pen P,.,t. ..Overnow Pump S1.1i,1990 3W.000 2W.W0 1W.000 E.Replx.Pn-,Room.A.B.C.2006 11,700.000 11.70DOW 1I,M COO o.St..,P-r G.mmien.EMS 12016 I6.110.000 16.12DOD0 I6.I20.W0 R.NAN.-,.M Comrtl Sy.Iwn.MR 520 W0 650 W0 52G,Ow SU&T0TAL -TRUT6YHT RANTI 13)6N000 1)8S36W0 10647000 S.)WWO 22957 16S44,000 1].WWO 94WWD 1O7OS1000 21b0000 138451000 3021O0W C0RF2A92.%LS 11 A6 AM SUNNI I 1 4 1 1 / 1 C 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CAPITAL OUTLAY RfVOLYF G FUND SCHEDULE Bl SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Pp ] IN1.1 BBS TO NOKLM1 A B C D f F G N 1 J K L RbTRMAN REWSEDTOTAL ESTIMATED REWIRED ESTIMATED E6TIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED -4 ESTIMATED RN COSTTO 0R 38W PROJECT EST C.I.P. WOOET NDGIT WDGFT WDGET BUDGET YEAR BUDGET YEAR COMPLfTE 0RIG F6T 1BB1-B3 B9091 1911.9] 19939] 1ppY9A 199L95 IB9SBB TOTAL 1880.]001 TOTAL PROJECTS C.flwlmuen Am.Sion I.Site Acwiwnon 15.000.000 5.000.000 6.000.OM Sporn' J 5.000.000 ].RWN-ga Pomi B].000.OW o1.00O.000 IMAXOD 100,000 ],8]0,000 18,000A00 ]6.000.000 fApB6,W0 EO,SS6,W0 p0,p55.000 SUISTOYAL RECLAMATION PLANTS »000000 BB 000 O00 1A3000 6100000 2W0 1B0J0000 35000000 I41155000 661155000 B5155W0 O.IN.1-1 N1 JdM FM4tln L InYM.m FmIIbL 49 o.IN'Im.rd.n[Bm Ii.BW.000 N.BOO,OW 600.O00 14.=,000 IO.M'000 2A00.000 ]BAOO.WO N.000.000 B.Inurd.m UWUY CNn a.IMUMN IN..,Ur+ BWp00 S]0.000 50.000 500.0D0 300.W0 B00.Om EOO,0J0 O.gB.n.r G..Um NO 1.0]O.Om ]0.0.'V Bm.000 W0.000 1.Om.mO I.ci ..CamuNo.Ij..CAN. 130.000 130.m0 MOOD IOO.ON A.Om 11o.m0 IN= 3.SWpml F.nIiWUM SIo.Mare ..AbNn.Mg.Emil.B R.t...1.7.155 S.7b.000 7.500.000 7.100,001 400.000 W.mO mm.cm O.C.nu.n E..l l.b 100MIc.41PI.J'11 1 INAm 2,061.000 I2.000 50.O00 150,0O0 I.750.000 2ASQSOO 2.01110.000 a.CMoIm Llornorv,J li 7.775.000 9.00O.00O 5.]N.N0 3.300,00O M.. ].M.NJ 3.700.00O G.Op.ntlomlCoeotol C.mo.J 2.1 4,575.000 3,515.0100 NS.ON 3.1 zQo00 3.I30.000 3,13L000 ..Co,te,Ewbm.nl.Jd]1(R.. N AT AAI 1,]m.000 "O DOO ]N.NO SOO.N cO0 O 3N. I.P.r..nml BuiMlry.1 Ro 1,J 15 SECOND, 1.410.000 IS.. ]N.00D WO,ON ADD,NO 1,IN.mO 1,1N.000 B.O.rMiOan elW Conlyd Gnrn /W.ON M. IN.000 ASO,000 AN.NO A.Ome30.n cl 5uppon BMB.6P3.}]T W.00O ]0.N0 W.NO W.NO 50.000 1.dmr/G.mmtlon F.cllioy ..Epiprn.m Pr. mltg .J.1BA 21. NON 24.351.000 20.351.¢0 3.000.000 6N.N0 500.000 SWIM SOONG 4,000.001) 500.000 A.M,= b.DN....WrcN...11BB 3AW.000 IJ3A.N0 3.714,000 a.N-l'Mo iry.J-19.1 15.300.000 15.IOO,NO 2.1N.000 10.400,00O MODAN IN.000 13.600.000 13.5N,Om S.PI.n13 Foodily,J 19d 35JBB.000 3].3W.000 H.6W.N0 T.ON.000 1.000.000 BNp00 9.5001000 6.600.N0 A.W..I.G.R.rn.J 21.J31A 161.N0 11,141.000 NS.N0 3W,N0 3 W,m0 350.000 5.a da B so,, Ur FUND su5.m ..S.M-78•ad.B S.-.J.]].I ILMI ].0]9.No 3.111.000 ].11].000 I.ONON 1.9N.N0 1.No.NO b.R.d.Ou11.11 No.I I.M S.ctlw„I` 3 ].HB,NO 2.000.000 BOO,NO 1.500.000 2,m0A00 ].NO,ON ..N..Surp.To..,Mo.1.J 23-8 I.W0.000 3.M.NO iN.ON 3,N0,000 IN.NO 3.3OO.M 3.300,000 ..T.np 01 SUrbn/or prUi No.1 3.000.000 2.600AN 21.1 O 3.5N.N0 ..SnoM O it.1-im,M.M.r MS'C' 3.8WAN A.gJAm AOO.ON 1.000.000 I.400.000 ],mO,mO 4.N0.000 I.E.I.I.-to D.N Wdn W930'WVAS 36.289.00O W.ONAN I.ODOA00 I.NOAN 39.000.000 49.O00.00O IO...000 6.built-Ilo-ut,0 TMI FW..JSUA9 500.000 300.000 GW.= W,000 W.No WAm 1.Pr.F.r.A.n c1 Utility Atln.l25 ],]OO." 15.000 5N,000 I.M.000 I.Ompm 600.000 265.000 3.u5.000 3.295.00O 6.TY.pMn.?N.m.oryBAON1o6w Ep.rWon BN.000 200.0O0 3N.000 200.00O 200.000 1N.000 9N.N0 B.W.A.N Im.M.nI TnM R.dw.nr.nl 35.370.000 31.00D.GC0 "No'. 6.000.000 IS.000.00O Io.000.000 31.50O.NO l,... 33.00F,00O 10.Dnvic.I I.-SnUm.R.A.8.5tWin N].O .000 1,Om.mO 2.000.000 2.c00.N0 CORF3AS3.%LS 11:A5 AM 6991 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SCHEDULE&1 SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Part, 1991 A 992 T020003001 A 0 C 0 F F G H 1 J K L MET KAN REVISED TOTAL ESTIMATED REQUIRED fSTMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED FIVE ESTIMATED TEN COST TO OR 80-80 PROJECT EST C.LP. BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET YEAR - BUDGET YEAR COMPLETE OFUG EST 188L82 O1a091 100 .2 188b03 15939A t90L06 199596 TOTAL 199&3001 TOTAL PROJECTS 11.Slud..depaeel Propane e.Campwt Oermnnreeon fleet 9.0.U.OW 9.W0,000 2.)OO.0.0 0.]OO.OW B4OW,000 6000000 O.L.rtl Aa "N"' x2.MU.000 2s.W0.000 1:.:ow 1:M GOD I'"M 1.000:000 21.000.000 2A,MO000 A.Landfill 0.wlapmere Free.1 20,e00,000 20,900,000 1a,W,WO 11.W0.000 15.600.Oro e.Caron poetry GOOOD.W0 60.3WOW S,aW.aaa a O. As.ae0.000 12.01.14.1 Inlormenlon Man...mem Nnwnr4 ..MAN tonne 0 Opee M9mnt CompUNY 59enem WaGow OOO,N'0 WOOOJ WOODS 0.1e61n1omu0nn Merup.mem Syelam 7W.M )5O000 TWOOD 750,000 e,Purclutlrp0nv.nlary C'"U"S". 421'000 421:000 421.0M Ax1AC0 e.aaaunMMilHmankl lnfemxtion System GOO.000 W. 600.0p0 a.EcpanS LAN Gntem UP9nee. 20GIOW 2O0,0OO SIX1,0.ro 200.OW 1.NetwoM1 LlNu9e Paalle.. IN OW ISD,0.ro I50,ND IW.ODO ' EMNone Conpepa]MW Errer9 G.rwmore IZ:000 )OO,0.ro EW,000 I.2M,W8 1,300,0.W t A....Preleau 5,000,000 10.200,000 2M1000 11000.000 1'..000 1...000 1,W0.. 1.... 6'... 6,OOD000 tO,OW.0.ro 15.DIM,Mae,.,Man M1olecu ..Replee.70'OUNW with I20'2WO 20.280.000 20,300.000 20,300,N0 6 E.pe OO 'C'b No412010 27.125,000 2),12.0GO .7.125,W0 e. m O� Slue9e Deep."Mall PM.112011 is.... 16AW,000 M.M.WO e.KIWIS,Ott.Equip Mass I&112001 115500.V 115500.Y' 1155OWO SU&TOTAL .INTENPLANTB JOINT 388.263,0001 42e,100,CW 58,O47,000 49.001,000 21,e10,000 15g50,000 2B,p00,CW 14,885p00 I]D506,000 8S"ODOCb 22],606.000 145.515,000 SU&TOTAL ' MAJOR PROJECTS IO16543000 1151764000 108646000 109426000 100627000 100e04 O00 109783000 7LS 00 1.9]MCOD 6]1� — TOTAL0 ])14000OO 2.Gp.el.l Pmpau,9n"n 6...... A.Action flan: 1.NPOES Pem01 Apyivaan S2pM 265,000 3x0,M0 a5,000 00 0 2.InFlememarlon.TOM SO000 3CO,000 200.000 IW,000 00 B.Scald.T—OrYorn.Dlyo.l.M bu.. 196.01 1.130,0" 169'. IOg000 IDD,WO II,000 00 )EDOOO wC.Deep Ocean Diatoms ErNUNon 5e0.000 1.529.0.M 5)9,CW SOp00 GOODS NOW SOON Got. )C0,000 AIr Quelily Cannel Pit.,— ],EOOpOS ],50O000 01.AIr Totln 1—mory 1AS2500 wJ PEEPI IOOOCO 1.242.000 )10,000 20 .. x00.0.V 1]2.ODJ 00 O2.VOCMOG BACT D.monstratien R.O— 2W.. 55D000 SOO.0.0 15D000 INGDO WOOD W E.W.rer Cons msrlon am Realmsaon RBD Projects ]150000 .M 0.ro 6OD 000 AW ON wo'. 5W hroW 0 WOW OSU&TOTAL SPECIAL PROJECTS 1115000 11101 OW IA50W0 9500W tOWOOS )Aa 000 W00.M SWWOW 60W000 0a.FOulpment lterm ]35W W0 AI018000 3W CW a)AA 000 15W W0 16W000 1515WW0W T6W 000 10 3T 225000 TOTAL JOINT WORKS CAPITAL RED IOW.22T OW 120T 6H 000 151 a5]OW IHA00 IWaDE .3I S)D00 11166a 0.M 035]IOW0 102000 W0 BS0 J9t O1a 0W TOTAL WITH 6%ANNUAL ENR LA CONST COST ADJ 1.661,565A]) 151,453.O0O II4,120.GW 113,910.018 119.393.070 135,994.450 79,807,065 503.233,610 229.339.529 792,573,O3, 7I7,539.400 CORF3A82.XL5 11:46 AM Wital / ! 1 4 1 1 4 4 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 512/91 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY BONED C CORF EQUIPMENT BUDGET 5/2/91 1991-92 8:28 AM TRUCKS& OTHER MACHINE COMMUN INSTRTrEST SAFETY& OFFICE COMPUTER DIV VEHICLES MOBILE EQ. EQ&TOOLS EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT TRAFFIC EQ FIX& EQ EQUIPMENT TOTAL NO. DEPARTMENT 55581-N 55562-N 55563-N 55564-N 55566-N 55567-N 55568-N 55569-N BUDGEr 21W Management Office 12,000 12.000 21W Board Secretary SO,D00 50,000 2170 Management Support 12,000 12,000 2180 Personnel 10.000 10.000 20,000 2210 Director of Finance 14.757 14.757 2220 Accounting 5,190 44,400 49,590 2230 Purchasing/Wamhousing 48.450 6,000 54.450 2240 Information Systems 25,000 400 38,425 3.500 31.895 43,300 142,620 3310 Dir.of Oper.&Mice. 12,500 6,925 10,000 17,400 20,000 66.825 3330 Plant Maintenance 1,300 16.979 375 5,000 300 23.954 3340 Collection Facilities 165,000 6.000 15,950 4,800 81,000 3.750 276,500 33SO Mechanical Maintenance 148,140 12,000 17,750 3,000 33,500 9,000 223,390 33W Electrical Maintenance 19,500 13,350 10,440 2,770 46,060 3370 Instrument.Maintenance 12,000 23,400 4,300 25,300 15,605 80,605 3380 Treatment Plant Door. 12,000 19,200 17,025 3.750 1,525 11,300 5,845 7.000 77,645 3510 Dir. of Technical Serv. 1,200 16,700 17,900 3520 Compliance 25,000 4.600 80.900 34,970 146.470 3530 Consv.,Rod.&Reuse 17,000 3,550 2,000 3,000 25,550 3540 Air Quality 50,000 2.000 16,fi00 68,600 3580 Laboratory 20,000 1,544,829 3.120 93,300 1.661.249 3590 Source Control 91,000 5,200 3,000 13.275 101,950 34,200 3,450 21,600 273,675 3710 Director of Engineering 3720 Planning and Design 78,350 78,350 37W Elect.,lnatr.&Control 3790 Construction Management 52.000 20,660 3,600 47,650 199,000 322810 TOTAL 91.92 REQUESTS 579,840 67,500 90.204 96,350 1,874,6041 160,705 261 370 613 627 3,744,000 CORF_92C.XLS 1 1 1 1 1 1 ( 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND CLASSINCATIOEI OF BUDGETED PROJECTS BY REVENUE PROGRAM CATEGORIES SCHEDULE WE Smmi FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 Pwo1 R P Y N REMCEMNT So OVID ADORIONAL REOUIREO REMCEMM IMTOVED ADOMONAL REVTOTAL REPLACEMNT IMMOVEO ADDITIONAL i TREATMENR CAPACT' 9VOOET i TREATMENT CAPACITY RAW ES EST i TREATMENT. CVACT' RECONSTR 199193 RECONSTR TO WEE RECONSTR 1.11-And ROMM11M MO.,helwly A.R-1-non Rom 1 I.Wrlolulw IS. p w i Swre Sin PI 27-112M 50A % SiS WOOD 35.. MOOD 2.130.000 I,e60.00 1.OM.= i R4rry C.A..NSA 6-15.P1 ]] 100.D]% 4000.000 ..000'000 42,700,000 42.700.000 ].GASNeNlirp FwiOJee,Pl.]L I 20.M% 8e.00% e.000.000 9W.00e 3,20O.OD0 IA.950.000 2.97e.000 I1.SS0.00e /.SIWOe XerWq iwWJn.PIJ42 50.00% W.00% 1".. W SWORD SERS'. 33,000.000 1'.00e.000 11.000.0ve 5.d0owom 11-16.P1 JN 100.ee% I2.000'. 1210"0.000 MISS).000 2A.500.OW 6.ReRtl of DIPNom B S 10.P1-]5.3 I00.00% 2.W0,000 2,000.. A 9W.000 2,SOe,000 T.Swertlory Trml ENontlen to OG MOD.FI]6 AS..% Ei 2.000.000 I.EOD.000 I.BOe.000 29,500.000 15.420.000 2].BBO.Ove 6.PM1rry Treeenwl 72 MGD EgwIvn.PI 37 100.00% I,WO000 I,OO].000 ]A.1CO. 2A,ICQWJ Mv0floom .11 39 100.00% 600.000 SDD,Oee 11.0410.000 11.020.000 10.9wunhiLertlocylp.P1JL1 100.00% SW,000 EOO,OW 11510.000 1,510.000 11,EenRWOLO Wert.P1.19.3 ISfi AW.000 400.000 A.920.000 4.920.000 IS,So..U"mdlp i Srwn Woh,1130.3 1W.W% I.W.000 1.000.000 IS.tOO.OW I6,1W,OW 13.FAW SYv,-9rprouwnonn,RL]]-1 1W.W% 25,OW 25.00e MA00 65A00 IA,AO MD Ovypn AVMneC SNCpo i DARR 100.00% 70,000.000 70.0W,W0 16..1 Pnno IA UNOI 100A0% 15,W0,000 'S'ocO W 16.ScliOv Smre9e M®wl 1 W.CO% I I.WO.000 I I,We.000 1T.DIpomm: 2 O 110'dwrxur IW.W% B.2W,000 9.2WW,O 19,SIortl6Y Poww 0emroJon IW.W% 9.200.000 6.2W.W0 19.12kY El-vol Pow.,DNL WJen 1 W.W% 3.900.OW 14W,W0 20.NwIXficotivn Prelwl IW.W% ].000.000 2.000.00O 21.Aow E-AR,Emerpo,Oypm IW.W% 3.000.000 210.V.O00 .R-TrkMp RUN.1 i] 1 W.W% 1,000,OOO I,OA,OW 23.0.nn/Air Carpmow 6Y40n 50.00% 50.00% WOOD, 25.000 25.000 SWAW 125.W0 I251OW 34.Mw.RNwY 60.00% 20m% 2e.00% I.p00.00e 600.000 200.000 2001. I0,214%. 6.160.000 3.050.000 2.050.OW 25.Olbr Meww Ran ReMele e.WSA.W p 0 CvgM Spam,1922 1 W.W% 5.070.000 5.070,¢O 9.Xetlwerte No.l neprltl.]W] 50.W% EO00% 4,9..000 ].4]5,000 TAT5,W0 v.NOMwoN Nc.3 Npgn/Rwp Spetl.2016 SEi Se.W% 3.... 1,]W.000 1.300100O C.Rwrw»TrINIry FWAm 2 i A.HMI] W00% 60.W% I.]W.OW 6W.SOO 6SO.000 A. AO M.Ovygn Avf05WCq&OAF,2017 IW.W% KORS000 34.000.000 3,110 N Oimrm,=3 i=12 1 W.W% M200.000 IS.SW.WO O.A 9Ni Provow W.20 50.W% 50.W% 0 I920.000 5.460.000 6.400.000 6.12 AV Po-De1MNlon.2W 1-2013 1 W.W% I,W9.000 1.099.OW LSioM6V1oww0enrn -HXI5i 3e15 1W.W% A.SH.000 A.61APW L 13 Mpf MmvY Trwrmenl.3W41 ED 12 1W.W% ]15W000 ]]SW.OW SULTOTAL -RECLAMATION PLLNTI ]06350W SWe.¢O 3935 W0 316W.000 A]]9560W A91M 000 ti 356 W0 ]b 5A1000 CORf4A93.RL5 11:62 AM 52T1 CAPRAL OUTLAY REVOLVING"NO Boni CLASSIFICATION OF BUDGETED PROJECTS BY REVENUE PROGRAM CATEGORIES SCHEDULE 63 FISCAL YEAR 1991.92 Ppv 3 Rc I n I YEAR RDu H REPLACEMNT IMMOVEO ADDTIONAL REQUIRED RF 991-92 IMPROVED ADDITIONAL REV TOTAL RFPLACEMXT IMPROVED ADDTIONAL • TREATMENT CAPACT' BUDGET L TREATMENT CAPACT' PROJECT EST l TREATMENT CAPACMY RECONSTR 199192 RECONSTR T02020 R'CON9TR B.Tr.almem Pant 2 1.SUPoon Fatal..ntl Site 8gnwnume e.Dotal- 133]31 100.DJ% 1.500,NO 1.500,0.0 3.)W,WO 2.)SO,000 e.WuelNum WNEM,P2dS3 IN.W% 500,N'0 SOO,000 t.0)SOM A.0)5.0N v.NAARI. -WWIry.P2-]S] IN.N% 1.0001. "OW.000 ],5)9.CCO ].b)5,N0 G.Comwetion FNrrapwmm gfiae.P2-35-4 1N.N% 638,0.ro 635.Qt0 e.N,-11 Site 4 S-ItY 9rq.,P23" 1N.N% IN.COD IN.000 2.SO:= 3.305p20 3.Atiev..•Arprov,to FMlitlm,P]37 1N.N% NA00 N,000 B.ISB,NO B.IbS,NO 3.ReluA Oipestm I.J.R,PS391 IN.N% A.ON.ON a,ON.NO S.]OO.NO fi,]N.ON A.A .M::.,..M.Pf 39] ISO 1,ON,ON I,000.000 6,N0,ON 6.0.ro,ON 6.ReNb gpmer N.O.P3d9-2 1N,N% S.00 . N S.ON,ON rArwYnmu B.Pmm lA MGO EgWvn.%al IN.N% 15,000.ON 16.000, O ).SmuWuy T-orns.Eavaawo,P2-421 JS.N% 33.NX 1,0 '. JN,000 350. 35.... 18,9N.000 v.]N,NO e.Ectopulnt PepuraMee,P2422A J6.N% 00 IS.N% 2.ODO.NO 1.500.000 ROD SIMOO 2.M.ND MIND B.EIeluffi- m P,Mac,'P NN N 242-1 I . % 6.000A e.D01= I1.000.000 11.ON,ON 10.I cafe,Afrc.1.•Ouhe 11.PS 421 60.N% N.NY Hat NO M.. I... 2,025.gM 1,$121. 1.513.500 11.SYUNa Upptllrq 6 Strout.Won.P2-R1�2 60.N% N.N% I.000.NO 600.0.^O 6N.000 IS.ON,NO J,625 NO ).625M 13.Nam.Mv6h.tlen B MA.Woh.P2-Cl3 fioQ.% N.N% I.N0.000 )N.000 )1O1 ].530.0.'V 1.)6o.N9 1.JN.000 13,MvriadlBACvmN 9MuM1 PS-H NAO% 50.N% S.EO0,000 t,JN,000 1.JN.000 A,Ow,DN 2.'02.,O00 2.010,O0" IA.Nal Start-Avpro Ra.K0332 IOO.N% SO.NO SOpb IJ6,N0 1)5,N0 16.HANSEy Power O...... M.N% 9.3N,N0 S.SN,000 16.1111,Stvreps: 21 IN,N% 6,3N.000 1 J.A0EItlarul lOS Fmt genur INAfO% 1.COD.3,3N.ON CN A,ON,NO I B.PateNe Wnu gnrlbutlon SNrun 1NA0% !.]N.NO A.350.0.V 18.Pmt W.Or Nmp Statlon IN.N% I,311ON0 1.300.000 SO "No Prolema W.N% 30.N% 30.N% 1.000.ON 6NN N W0N.0 2 ,N0 SN.000 10, 0. B.2W,ON 3.OSO.ON 2.O0.NO 21.OIMr Mmmr Pm Projects ..Ovemaw Zu Station.1990 IM00% MON 2N,N0 b.R.qm.Farm,W.-A.R.C. MS J6.N% 36.N% II,JN.IN a,JJS.ON 2A.S.Ob a.SWWbY Powar Gerwam,3ME B 2015 M. % I6,1M.OM 18.130.OM E.M.NtonN and Con UM SyaMn.3M5 N.N% NQN% 5= 250.00D 160000 SUISTOTAL -TRERNURTMAM3 SaJM 000 IO650000 18N.0.tl Io 2N 000 17983BON 56665.500 42811 AN U47.00O CORFA93.%LS 1152 AM son, / 4 1 i 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 cAPRAL OI]]IAv n6voLWlc Fuxo C10k331PG]ION OF&IOOETED PROJEC)3 BY REVENUE PROGRAM CA)EGOPIEs 5[XEDVIF 63 ROM MCALYFAR 199193 Pp 3 A P c P F E P y 1 l 6 PER(ENTAGE ALLOCA RON 1991-9 BOOG V AR TXROWX 030 PEMUE IMPROVED AOd110XAL PEOUIRED REM1ACEMM IMPROVED ADDRIOXAL RFV TOTAL REPLAfFAWf IMPROVED ADDITIONAL 8 TREATMENT CAPACITY BUOGET a TREATMNN] CAPAC MOJECTM i TREATMENT CAPACITY RECONSTR 1991-93 PECONSTR TO 3030 RECOXSTR C.An ,,n bn mom sit" I.Z.Aeptlltlen W.WY W.CO% 5.W0.000 1.500.000 3.500.000 5.000.WO 3.SD3.W3J.� 2.Pntlmtlnn A.3 6O.O3% 60.COx 10D000 60.000 50.000 e1.000.M0 30.500.0.roSUB-TOTAL- PECUMATON M1ANTS 5100000 2650.OW 5550000 66000P00 3.ZW ;FNilie..`RNR`C10.00% .. % lA.M0.000 I.AOO.NO 1S.e00.000 36.600.000 3.6EO.000 itiir U- W.G0% W.D3xMWN,I W.ler llll. 50.G0% W.00% $ OOD 350,DO0 350.000 Bx0,000 AI0.0000G.dy.tn-d Ulw 50.00% SO.00% SOO.000 350,W 350.000 1,030,W0 510,000 0.. FeNN - WSW 50.00x so.00x lao.aao 50.aM SO.o00 130.000 es.aOO 3.sliPPon F '. v4 SN .5A i^ d19.Eay.n.a R. @1`}]yys W.00% 1o.00x 60.c0% .W.oao N.000 W.000 a25.000 ].SOO.. ]SOA00 )60.0000 N.Ce'"" .t 4.im alh.@P1.}1t-t E0.00x 53.00% 6o.oa0 36,aW x5.000 x.oe1,000 I,oa1.o00 1.031,000 a Gmr.ILWr.mry.Fl) 100,W% 3.130.ala. a.300.Od1 9.000,CU0 1.000.00O J.OP cw Ecipamrx Gm.r.}1]-1 SO.WY 50.00% ].130.0.V 1.58s.W0 1,686,000 3A]s,OJO I,B]],500 1,63],6W ..Canpuw Epip Rn �23.2'"' 1O0.c0% 100.OM ac0.000 1.a00.W0 1.IODf00 1.Pn.nm.I 0OW RI 1.}le ICO.00% TIO.00J x00.NO 1.11O.N3 1.I IO.Ni 9.Gnu65en W S Ca MGmrt 100.00% A50.000 A$0.OW .0�nitl.n nI o.Fitt 9J0.@P3.}3] IOO.CO% BO.DJ3 BO.000 a.Gmra G.n.mlion FHiry ..Epvgnnt PrapurtM1e..}19A 50.00% W.W% 3.000.000 1.000.0.V 1.000.000 1..851.0.V 11135.500 IIASS,SW 6.Erri.eon Nrtnn..F19B W.00% W.00x ].em..' 1.002.000 I,9eS,W0 e.R.mIFSYW.191 W. % W.00% t0.000.OW 5.3W.. 6.SW.WO Is.3WOOO ).eW.0c0 7.800.000 J.R.nt aNt P. .J Y3 W.W% W.00Y ).000.0G0 a.s00.W0 3.500.000 1].SW.GW Il.e]5.000 Ii,e]5,000 L Wmm Or N' JQ1.J31A 100.00% aW.000 ]W,¢O eH.OM 6b.0.11 5.Cm1i 6 78'........224 Rvp..tiem 6.iN0'mit.Ot]. ,..I S. S.-} 22-2 WO.W% 1.000.. 1,Mall ].III.PTO ].II1.PU 6.Np Dmli Ne.l l.IW 3stlm133-1 1W.W% 500.000 EOO.WO 1,000.0J3 1.D:IO.WO e.N.w 302Suiu .rwNOO1a IW.W% ],aW,000 ].3W.dU e.Sec d33t.oa lw Omti No.' 1W.W% 1,e00.0W 1.600.dW I.Bwwd d..FVO.H.W.R' o- C' ]O.W% 00.W% .A00.000 3,OBO.00D 1.00O.000 E.OR.)B'it D.q,.. ..O241 1W.W% W.000.000 W.dW.000 6.IMWemi-...Mir Ti.T. F�i.J.3t/AA IW.W% W.o.. W.000 )W.OTO ]W.WO ).Prggr.Ym et UtiFtV Ativ.}25 IW.W% M.CN SW.000 a.3C0.000 ],3W.WO 6.W.P6m.?N.nwtT..m RiN4 Fan1 WAD% W.W% ZW.000 IW.000 IW.OTO BW.000 b . W .W.O:O 9.Bu.NmIm.M.m Trvli Regsamem 60.W% 20.W% 32... 0 36.N0.000 6.WO.WO I D.DwIIietl Pow.r S].Imv P.M6.sMi.. IW.W% 3.WO,OW 3,00o.000 COPF40,92.Xls 1"I. Will CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLWNG FUND SCHEDULE bt SAA1 CLASSIFICATION Of BUDGETED PROJECTS BY REVENUE PROGRAM CATEGORIES Pp./ FISCAL YEAR 1991.9E A II 4 F 9 E SL a 1 1 5 X REMCFMXT IMPROVED ADMOONAL MOURNED RERACEMNT IMPROVED ADOMONAL REV TOTAL REMCEMpT IMPROVED ADDITIONAL i TREATMENT CAPACITY BUDGET • TREATMENT CAPACITY PROJECT EST i TREATMENT CAPACITY RECONSTR 199L93 RECONSTS T03W0 RECONSTR 11.SW W DlpoOil P...0 a Curgwl Dwmrmod-Rou W.CO% EO.00% B.GV.WO /.SO%OW 4.SW.000 B.L.rtl AaRUwfl. EO.00% EO.GO% .000:000 15.000.000 1].GDO 000 n.LrMMI D.Mgrwm Ru..l 5O.Do% 50.00% 28.W GOD 1/.300.00D 1/.300.OW e.C.t IWO, W.W% W.00% SDaeO.dro 35.180.000 35.190.000 12 dntlq IMamuOon Wnop-O WY,l o.M.imono A OR-MORI Cwryulor-w- 100.00% M. 900.000 8M.000 900.M0 e.L lnTomutlon M.nponwm SYNorn 1DO.00% TW.= 760 )60.OW )5 Z e.wrclwirynnr.nlw ConuN SYNxn 50.00% S5.a0% S5.WX /I1.OD0 31O,500 IS= 105.550 u1.OW 21..SDO 105.S50 1as.3s0 e.Aenwnury/Flnolelol lnlomwlon sntun 50.00% 55.00% SSAOX SOO:OOD SEG.00o 125,000 IS5.000 6N.0W SSO.. I2s.000 1]S.OGS e.Etlolirq tAN SYNnn UppoOn 100.00% 100.000 100.GOD 3M.ON' ]00.000 J.Not_A U.rt F&M.. IGI IE0000 I50,ODO 1.,Oro 160,000 1].EM.iom Coln Al]MW Emory G-.- s0.GI SO.00% ZOOO 360000 3s0.000 I,SWPW 500.000 WO.WO 1/..-,.to Wm% 20.00% 20.00% L000. 800.000 I00.000 200.. 1o.ISO.OW 6.120.0.0 I.Ob,000 I2.Ob,OW 15.OlbrMASON Rm Ropou RW-.)8'OHO MM I20'IW9 SO GO W.W% 20,I.O O,I. W 'C' e H.nR iD19 W.M % lO6B. q00 ) W 661.sO0 o 0Wp o130I WO% ).BW,0.0 )BW.00D J.SWO OP. MM I..1;X1 50.00% 5000% 1155OOW 5))5000 6))60W SU&TOTAL INTERRAHTSJOINT /e,001.000 1/,990.500 6,27O,250 ]9]4D,350 /28.1MOW 1/1.919.000 I9,6/5,I50 I35,503]W 6UWTOTAL ` MAJOR MOJECTs IDe428 GOO 30.50500 1/s95150 6/3903W 11s176/OW 35563/500 ]08513)W 6856117W 3.SPedOI Pr�.Srvtl.O•R-h A.A..R.n: I.NMI SS P.mil AFKA .n IOD.M% /5.000 /5.000 265.000 3..GOD i.IrrRN-nl...n-TOM 1M.W% 24WS ]W.WO 5M.000 SW.Ooo B.SWM.Tnolm.M.N.W..FRI.. 100.W% IW.000 IW.WO 1,I30.OW I.t30.W0 C. Do W.-DANI EVOM.6on 10O.D3% WORD WOOD 1,639p00 I.s39,0.0 D.Alr OUaRY Cont.PO,R- 3.500.000 I.AIr Tomes fi-O"V 1A035..wl PEER MODS6 300.000 IW.000 1,3/3.000 1,S/].00D S.VOCMOG SALT O.rmnv.Uon Pro9r.m 1W.W% IW.000 300.OW 5W,ODD sSO.ODO E.W.I.,C-VAS.n.W R.dmtlon R&D R.N.0 IOO,W% /00 COO ADDOro SAW. 316GWO SU6TOTALL SPECIAL PROJECTS BW WO BW OW 11101 OW )W1 WG 3.EWigmnt lunwo ]0.W% W.W% 30.00% ])4 WO )/.9W I97I IXp I1331W 4619000 BB6D BW 33/D95W 1345.)W TOTAL JOINT WORKS CAPITAL AEG II.I MOOG 31388300 17/172W .5/l3/W I]0)../DOo Se656.3W 3395333W CORFA93.XU5 11:53 AM smal 1 4 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY AND COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY GOVERNING QUALITY CONTROL OF WASTEWATERS DISCHARGED TO THE SANTA ANA REGIONAL INTERCEPTOR -----------------------------------------------------"'-------- THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING is made and entered into, to be effective the 1st day of April, 1991, by and between: SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY, hereinafter referred to as "SAWPA"; AND COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, for itself and as agent for COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOS. 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7 , 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, hereinafter referred to as "CSDOC" . RECITALS WHEREAS, CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT and CSDOC entered into an Agreement on 12th day of April, 1972, entitled "Waste Water Treatment and Disposal Agreement", a copy of which is attached hereto as Attachment No. 1 and incorporated herein by this reference, whereby CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, also referred to as "Upper District", was granted the right by CSDOC to purchase up to 30 million gallons per day of treatment and disposal rights for purpose of ocean disposal of non-reclaimable wastewaters in the Santa Ana River Watershed upstream from CSDOC service area, hereinafter sometimes referred to as "Upper Basin"; and WHEREAS, said Agreement between CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT and CSDOC was subsequently assigned to SAWPA on November 13, 1974, which assignment included all rights, title, and interest in and to said Agreement; and WHEREAS, said Agreement does set forth certain quality criteria of the waste water discharged by Upper District and stipulated that a quality monitoring program for said waste water from Upper District, acceptable to all parties, shall be established and all costs thereof shall be borne by Upper District; and o.i' 1 r i WHEREAS, subsequent to execution of the 1972 Agreement, CSDOC, pursuant to applicable laws, regulations and permits, including statues and regulations of the United States Environmental Protection Agency [EPA] and the State Water Resources Control Board [SWRCB] , is required to promulgate and enforce industrial source controls through an approved pretreatment program; and WHEREAS, CSDOC, the owner and operator of the wastewater treatment system and the holder of the NPDES permit, did on September 8, 1989, adopt a revised regulation in the form of an Ordinance entitled "Wastewater Discharge Regulations" which sets forth certain quality requirements which must be met by all dischargers of wastewater tributary to the treatment and disposal facilities of CSDOC, including the wastewaters originating in the Upper Basin, in order to protect the sewerage system, the marine environment, to meet the Districts' NPDES permit requirements of EPA, Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB] and the SWRCB, and to comply with all other applicable provisions of law; and WHEREAS, SAWPA did on June 12, 1990, adopt Ordinance No. 1 (Revised) entitled "An Ordinance Regulating the Availability and Use of the Santa Ana Regional Interceptor". This Ordinance No. 1 contains similar provisions as CSDOC's Ordinance setting forth the same quality requirements which must be met by all dischargers of _ wastewaters in the Upper Basin which are tributary to the treatment " and disposal facilities of CSDOC. SAWPA's Ordinance No. 1 has been reviewed by CSDOC which has determined that it meets, when implemented, administered and enforced, the intent of administering the Quality Criteria provisions contained in Paragraph 5 of the aforementioned Agreement between SAWPA and CSDOC. NOW, THEREFORE, SAWPA and CSDOC, in consideration of the mutual promises contained in this Memorandum of Understanding, do hereby agree as follows: GENERAL Section 1: Retention of Powers. A. CSDOC is regulated by several agencies of the United States Government and the State of California pursuant to the provisions of Federal and State Law. Federal and State Laws grant to CSDOC the authority to regulate and/or prohibit, by the adoption of ordinances or resolutions, and by issuance of discharge permits, the discharge of any waste, directly or indirectly, to CSDOC's sewerage facilities. Said authority includes the right to establish limits, conditions, and prohibitions; —� to establish flow rates or prohibit flows discharged to 2 CSDOC-s sewerage facilities; to require the development of compliance schedules for the installation of equipment systems and materials by all users; and to take all actions necessary to enforce its authority, whether within or outside CSDOC's boundaries, including those users that are tributary to CSDOC or within areas for which CSDOC has contracted to provide sewerage services. B. Neither SAWPA nor CSDOC, by entering into this Memorandum of Understanding, relinquishes to the other, any of its independent statutory or other powers and responsibilities relative to the provisions of sewer service; promulgation, administration and enforcement of waste discharge requirements; or operation of its publicly-owned sewer facilities, nor by entering into this Memorandum of Understanding, does either party recognize any changes or modifications in the aforementioned "Waste Water Treatment and Disposal Agreement. " However, by entering into this Memorandum of Understanding, the Parties do agree to the cooperative implementation of required powers and responsibilities for insuring the quality of wastewaters tributary from the Upper Basin to the treatment and disposal facilities of CSDOC. C. CSDOC and SAWPA further acknowledge and agree that changes in the laws and regulations to which CSDOC and `Rey` SAWPA are bound, which have occurred subsequent to the Agreement, require changes in the continuing operational aspects of wastewater collection, treatment and disposal, most notably the implementation of a comprehensive industrial wastewater pretreatment program. D. Neither the 1972 Agreements nor this Memorandum of Understanding contemplates nor shall it be authorization for any discharge by any user, to the sewer system of SAWPA or CSDOC, of any waste which is subject to regulation or prohibition under the terms of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980; Toxic Substances Control Act; California Hazardous Substances Act; or the California Hazardous Waste Control Law. The parties acknowledge the existence of a separate agreement between them authorizing and regulating the discharge of wastewaters to CSDOC facilities from the Stringfellow Pretreatment Facility. Those discharges are governed by that agreement and are not subject to this agreement. 1%01' 3 V E. Except as hereinafter provided, SAWPA shall continue to exercise jurisdiction and control, as outlined in the aforementioned "Waste Water Treatment and Disposal Agreement", over all discharges located within SAWPA's territorial boundaries in the Upper Basin that are tributary and discharge to CSDOC's facilities. In addition, SAWPA shall have: 1] The responsibility to issue Wastewater Discharge Permits ("Permits") and to enforce violations of Permit requirements; 2] The responsibility to monitor wastewater flows and perform inspections at SAWPA's expense; 3] The responsibility to collect any non-compliance fines, fees, user charges, taxes, capital recovery fees, and other lawful charges as levied by SAWPA. 4] The responsibility to prepare and submit appropriate Quarterly and Annual Reports pertaining to the administration of Ordinance No. 1 and this Memorandum of Understanding to the Environmental Protection Agency, the Regional Water Control Board, and CSDOC. PERMITTING PROCESS Section 2 : Permitting Procedures A. All direct and indirect dischargers seeking Santa Ana Regional Interceptor (SARI) service from SAWPA in the Upper Basin shall file with SAWPA a permit application as set forth in SAWPA Ordinance No. 1. After SAWPA has determined that the application is complete, SAWPA shall develop the permit requirements and forward the permit information and the permit to CSDOC for its review. The permit will not be issued to the proposed discharger by SAWPA until after CSDOC has reviewed the permit application, the proposed permit requirements, and given written concurrence to SAWPA. Said concurrence shall be delivered to SAWPA within ten (10) business days after receipt of the application by CSDOC. Such concurrence shall not be unreasonably withheld by CSDOC. 4 If additional data or information is required by CSDOC, or should CSDOC take exceptions to any of the proposed permit conditions, or wish to include any additional limitations or provisions, SAWPA shall be notified within said ten (10) day period. CSDOC will provide its concurrence or refusal within five (5) business days after receiving SAWPA's response to CSDOC's request. Special meetings between SAWPA and CSDOC, or SAWPA, CSDOC and the proposed discharger may be necessary during the permit review process. Such meetings can be requested by any party, but shall be arranged by SAWPA. Requests for additional data and/or information by CSDOC shall be made by SAWPA to the discharge applicant. B. SAWPA shall notify all existing holders of permits issued by SAWPA of the conditions of their Ordinance No. 1 and this Memorandum of Understanding, that they will be required to replace such existing permits with Permits issued in accordance with the provisions and procedures established in Ordinance No. 1 and this Memorandum of Understanding. C. Any dischargers that are discharging to the SARI system without a valid permit issued by SAWPA shall be required to obtain a Permit under SAWPA's Ordinance No. 1. The same procedures for the issuance of these Permits shall • be as set forth above in Section 2A above. Within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this Memorandum of Understanding, SAWPA shall notify all such known dischargers of this requirement and demand compliance within thirty (30) days thereafter. D. SAWPA's and CSDOC's Ordinances provide each agency with the authority to modify and change Permit conditions and terms during the life of the Permit. Where Permit terms and conditions are proposed to be modified and/or changed, the Party proposing the change shall promptly notify the other Party. SAWPA may elect to impose discharge requirements more stringent than those of CSDOC. E. The same procedure as set forth in Section 2A above, shall apply to renewal, modification or changes in terms or conditions of permits. Copies of all permits, renewed permits and modified permits, signed by SAWPA, shall be forwarded to CSDOC within fifteen (15) days of issuance. 5 MONITORING, INSPECTION AND REPORTING PROCESS Section 3 : Monitoring A. SAWPA shall have the primary responsibility for scheduled and unscheduled monitoring of all direct and indirect dischargers tributary to the SARI system. The responsibility of SAWPA maintaining an adequate monitoring program does not preclude CSDOC from obtaining data through their own monitoring efforts. Should CSDOC require specific wastewater quality data, CSDOC shall first request the information from SAWPA. B. SAWPA may request a self-monitoring program by the discharger. Any such self-monitoring program shall be set forth in the Permit requirements as established by SAWPA and approved by CSDOC. SAWPA shall provide CSDOC with copies of such discharger's self-monitoring results. C. Each party shall provide the other with copies of reports for all monitoring, sampling or laboratory testing which it performs on dischargers in the Upper Basin, and agrees to exchange all information as obtained. D. Except in an emergency, any monitoring efforts to be performed by CSDOC on any discharger in the Upper Basin shall only be performed upon notification, as soon as possible, to SAWPA, but not less than twenty-four (24) hours in advance, in order to afford SAWPA an opportunity to have a representative present. Such notice may be given by telephone, confirmed in writing or by electronic telecommunication (FAX) . Section 4: Inspection A. Inspection of each discharger to the SARI system shall be the responsibility of SAWPA. SAWPA shall maintain and implement an inspection program and shall document the inspections with a written report. The inspections shall be in accordance with the "State of California Pretreatment Program Implementation Guidance" manual. B. SAWPA shall immediately notify CSDOC of any discharge which presents an imminent danger to the public health, safety or welfare, or which threatens to interfere with the operation of the CSDOC sewerage system. Similarly, CSDOC shall immediately notify SAWPA of any discharge entering the CSDOC sewerage system from SAWPA which is determined to present an imminent danger to the public 6 health, safety or welfare, or to the local environment, or which threatens to interfere with the operations of the CSDOC sewerage system. C. The number and timing of inspections will depend upon the volume of the discharge, the nature of the discharge, status of compliance, etc. CSDOC will, at its option, participate, with SAWPA, in any inspection. such joint routine inspections should be done on a frequency to be determined by SAWPA depending on the necessity of the inspection to insure the quality of the discharge, but in no event shall the inspections of each discharger be done less than twice annually or less than the minimum number required by Federal regulation. D. Should CSDOC wish to initiate an inspection of any discharger in the Upper Basin, it may do so as CSDOC may deem necessary. Except in an emergency, CSDOC shall notify SAWPA of its intent, as soon as possible, but not less than twenty-four (24) hours in advance in order to afford SAWPA an opportunity to have a representative present during the inspection. such notice may be given by telephone, confirmed in writing or by electronic telecommunication (FAX) . Section 5: Reporting A good communication and information exchange between SAWPA and CSDOC is essential to promote and sustain a successful, effective and efficient working relationship. It shall be the practice that all data on all point sources relating to discharge, quality, and other information produced as a result of monitoring, inspection and enforcement conducted or received by SAWPA on the Upper Basin dischargers shall be communicated to CSDOC. Specifically, SAWPA will make available to CSDOC the following reports: A] Monthly activity report detailing the number and identification of new and existing permittees, inspections, enforcement actions, and monitoring data, B] Copies of Enforcement Correspondence, C] Monthly flow and quality data for the discharge to the CSDOC system at the monitoring station located near the Orange County boundary line. D] Quarterly Report and Annual Report of summary of items (A) , (B) , and (C) , above. ``-� 7 r CSDOC shall advise SAWPA of any changes in the CSDOC ` pretreatment requirements which will affect SAWPA. ENFORCEMENT Section 6: Primary Responsibility A. SAWPA through its Ordinance No. 1 shall have the primary responsibility for enforcing all SAWPA's waste discharge policies and procedures relative to all Permit terms and conditions. B. SAWPA shall inform CSDOC of all dischargers who are in non-compliance with any of the provisions of their discharge permit or the SAWPA Ordinance No. 1 and what action is to be taken by SAWPA to enforce the provisions of SAWPA's Ordinance No. 1. C. SAWPA acknowledges that it and each of its member agencies has the responsibility to develop, implement and enforce an industrial pretreatment program and assume all obligations set forth in Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 403 which includes notification to all affected industrial users of pertinent categorical standards and monitoring and reporting requirements contained in 40 CFR 403 .12 or included as part of the categorical standard. SAWPA shall require all of its member agencies and all other agencies who discharge to the SARI system to enter into an interjurisdictional agreement with SAWPA, setting forth the respective obligations to develop and implement a pretreatment program. SAWPA agrees that in the event of amendment(s) to applicable Federal statutes or regulations, it will amend its Ordinance to comply with the new Federal requirements. CSDOC shall advise SAWPA of any changes in the CSDOC pretreatment requirements which will affect SAWPA. D. CSDOC shall review SAWPA's Ordinance and amendments thereto, and any interjurisdictional agreements concerning discharge of waste to SARI for conformance with 40 CFR Part 403. To ensure inclusion of all other legal provisions mandated by law and this Agreement, CSDOC shall periodically review the enforcement efforts of SAWPA, any member agency thereof, and any other agency having discharge rights to the SARI system pursuant to contract with SAWPA to ascertain whether pretreatment requirements are being diligently enforced. 8 To the extent SAWPA chooses to administer its own pretreatment program, CSDOC may periodically review SAWPA's pretreatment program activities to ensure that SAWPA, any member agency thereof, and any other agency having discharge rights to the SARI system pursuant to contract with SAWPA is adequately administering its pretreatment program in conformance with the Federal Pretreatment Regulations (40 CFR 403) ,and all CSDOC requirements. If CSDOC determines that SAWPA, any of its member agencies, or any of its contract agencies has failed or has refused to fulfill any pretreatment requirements, CSDOC may develop and issue a remedial plan containing a description of the nature of the pretreatment deficiencies, an enumeration of steps to be taken by SAWPA, and a time schedule for attaining compliance with all pretreatment requirements. Where SAWPA fails to satisfy the terms of the remedial plan, CSDOC may, upon thirty (30) days written notice, suspend all or part of SAWPA's use of CSDOC facilities until such time as SAWPA satisfies the terms of the remedial plan. In addition to the actions above, CSDOC may seek injunctive relief against SAWPA, any member agency thereof, any agency having discharge rights to the SARI system pursuant to contract with SAWPA and/or any user contributing to the \1eW' failure to comply with the remedial plan, and/or may pursue other self-help remedies. Section 7: Enforcement Process by CSDOC A. If SAWPA staff is unwilling or does not take appropriate enforcement action against a discharger acceptable to CSDOC, CSDOC with notification to SAWPA may cause enforcement actions as follows: 1] CSDOC shall send written notice to SAWPA, signed by its General Manager or his designee, specifying that a violation has or is occurring with respect to a particular discharger in the Upper Basin. The notice shall contain sufficient information to substantiate the contention of CSDOC as to the nature of the violation and to the inappropriate enforcement action taken by SAWPA. 23 If the General Manager of SAWPA agrees with CSDOC, then he shall forthwith undertake proceedings under Article 6 of SAWPA's Ordinance No. 1. �/ 9 l 3] If the General Manager of SAWPA disagrees with CSDOC, he shall forthwith cause a hearing to be held not more than 10 days after notice is received from CSDOC. Said hearing shall be conducted by the SAWPA Commission to determine whether a violation has or is occurring and shall make findings and direct such remedial action as it deems appropriate. 4] I£ CSDOC disagrees with the findings or the enforcement/remedial action of SAWPA's Commission, CSDOC may pursue such remedies as provided by law or regulations. 5] Joint enforcement action against any discharger violating its permit conditions may be taken when agreed to by SAWPA and CSDOC. B. Where a discharge to the CSDOC sewerage system reasonably appears to present an imminent danger to the public health, safety, or welfare, or presents or may present an imminent danger to the environment, or threatens to interfere with the operation of the CSDOC sewerage system, CSDOC may immediately initiate steps to identify the source of the discharge, and to halt and prevent said discharge. In the event this is unable to be effected successfully, CSDOC may suspend all or part of SAWPA' s i use of CSDOC facilities as provided in paragraph 6 of *� said "Waste Water Treatment and Disposal Agreement" until such time as the danger has been abated. In addition to the actions above, CSDOC may seek injunctive relief against SAWPA, any member agency thereof, any agency having discharge rights to the SARI system pursuant to contract with SAWPA and/or any user contributing to the emergency condition, and/or may pursue other self-help remedies. Section 8: Indemnity SAWPA shall indemnify CSDOC for all damages, fines, and costs incurred by CSDOC imposed by a regulatory agency or a court of competent jurisdiction as a result of waste discharge from SAWPA, its member agencies or contract agencies. Said amounts for indemnification shall include, but not be limited to fines, fees, penalties, charges, or costs resulting from injury to CSDOC personnel, damages to CSDOC facilities, disruption of treatment processes or operations, degradation of sludge quality, NPDES permit violations, and other air, water, and sludge quality violations. 10 1 CSDOC shall indemnify SAWPA for all damages, fines, and costs incurred by SAWPA imposed by a regulatory agency or a court of competent jurisdiction as a result of waste discharge from CSDOC, its member agencies or contract agencies. Said amounts for indemnification shall include, but not be limited to fines, fees, penalties, charges, or costs resulting from injury to SAWPA personnel, damages to SAWPA facilities, disruption of treatment processes or operations, degradation of sludge quality, NPDES permit violations, and other air, water, and sludge quality violations. AMENDMENTS AND MODIFICATIONS Section 9: Amendments and Modifications The terms of this Memorandum of Understanding may be amended only by written agreement by both parties. This Memorandum of Understanding shall be reviewed, and revised, if necessary, at least every three years from the effective date. This Memorandum of Understanding along with SAWPA's Ordinance No. 1 establishes procedures for the quality monitoring program as set forth in paragraph 5, "Quality Criteria" of the aforementioned April, 1972 Agreement. NOTICE Section 10: Notice Except as otherwise provided herein, all notices and other communications required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing, shall be delivered in person, by electronic telecommunication or sent by registered mail or certified mail, return receipt requested, and shall be deemed received upon personal delivery or seventy-two (72) hours after deposit in the mail of the United States Postal Service in Orange or Riverside Counties, which ever is appropriate, postage prepaid and addressed as follows: TO SAWPA: SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY ATTENTION: GENERAL MANAGER 3600 TYLER STREET - SUITE 207 RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92503 1�w' 11 TO CSDOC: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY �J ATTENTION: GENERAL MANAGER P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SAWPA and CSDOC have executed this Memorandum of Understanding as of the day and year first above written. , SANTA^ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY (By "� g Y\" "'^"�' Chairma SAWPA ommission COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation District Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of orange County, California By Chairman, Board of Directors By Secretary, Board of Directors APPROVED AS TO FORM: THOMAS L. WOODRUFF, DISTRICTS COUNSEL By TFN:tw:R:3/7/91(1801N.SM) 12 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ~ PROPOSED PROJECTS FOR UNDERSTANDING AND IMPROVING THE ORANGE COUNTY ENVIRONMENT POLLUTANT FATE AND CONTROL PROGRAMS -Microbial detection research -Disinfection research to find better alternatives to use of chlorine -Food chain contamination research -Research on alternatives to use of pesticides and herbicides POLICY AND REGULATORY ISSUES -Comprehensive watershed management planning -Nonpoint source water quality impact project RESEARCH FOUNDATIONS AND INSTITUTIONAL ENDOWMENTS -Facilities for SCCWRP on the UCI Campus -Establish a regional water quality data evaluation center -Endowment of National Academy of Sciences -Endowment of USC Catalina Island Marine Science Institute -Endowment of a Graduate Fellowship at Kerchoff Marine Laboratory -Endowment for U.C. Irvine School of Social Ecology PUBLIC INFORMATION AND EDUCATION PROGRAMS -Projects to identify and promote alternatives to use of hazardous household products ' RE : AGENDA ITEM NO. 15 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 21 ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA 108AL ELLIBAVENUE R.0 Box 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 \/ mn 9623 1I May 30, 1991 REPORT OF THE CONSERVATION. RECYCLE & REUSE COMMITTEE Meeting Date: May 30. 1991 - 5:30 p.m. CONSERVATION. RECYCLE & REUSE COMMITTEE Present: Staff Present: John C. Cox Jr. , Chairman J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Richard B. Edgar Charles Nichols, Conservation, William D. Mahoney Recycle & Reuse Manager Carrey Nelson Blake P. Anderson, Director of Iry Pickler Technical Services Leslie A. Pontious Mike Moore, Principal Environmental Phil Sansone Specialist �..i Peer Swan Edna Wilson Grace Winchell Absent: Others Present: Burnie Dunlap Betty Mrgudich, General Counsel 's Arthur G. Newton Office Glenn Parker David MacDonald, MacDonald-Stephens Sal Sapien Engineers 1) Water Conservation a. State/EPA Clean Water Grant Status Staff advised the Committee that the Districts received a letter dated May 13, 1991, from the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) concerning the Clean Water Grant No. C-06-1073-150 for the Hydraulic Reliability Project. The SWRCB has approved the Districts' Water Conservation Program and Implementation Plan and found that all elements of the grant were fulfilled. This preserves the Districts' $1, 046,281 grant. Conservation„ Recycle and Reuse Committee Report May 30, 1991 `1 b. Phase I - Part 1 Hotel/Motel Retrofit Proaram Staff reported that the agreement between the Metropolitan Water Districts of Southern California (MWD) , City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department, the Disney Corporation and the Districts, for joint participation in the demonstration retrofit project of the Disneyland Hotel, has been signed by all parties. The Disney Corporation's renovation of the hotel has started with the first floor to be finished by July 1, 1991. Flow meters are currently being evaluated by Anaheim and the Districts and will be placed in operation in the latter part of June. C. Water conservation Programs with Other Cities Staff reported that the Districts have received two additional requests for participation in water conservation programs from the City of Buena Park and the Hyatt Hotel in the City of Newport Beach. Buena Park requested joint participation between the City, the Districts, and MWD in purchasing 4,000 low-cost water conservation kits through MWD and making them available for customer pick-up at local city buildings and libraries, similar to the joint program currently underway with the City of Anaheim. The Hyatt Hotel in the City of Newport Beach is interested in retrofitting the hotel with water conservation devices similar to the Disney Hotel demonstration project. The Buena Park proposal is similar to the Costa Mesa demonstration project. Results from these demonstration projects are expected over the next 9 to 12 months. Staff reviewed preliminary project cost estimates (Districts' share) equalling $5, 000 for the Buena Park proposal and $14,000 for the Hyatt Newporter Hotel proposal. Staff advised that we also expect greater interest from the Districts' member cities, agencies, and commercial establishments responding to the continuing drought conditions. As awareness of the Districts' demonstration projects increases, we expect more requests similar to those discussed. Accordingly, the staff sought policy guidance on the management of these and potential future water conservation and plumbing retrofit proposals. After a brief discussion by the Committee, it was the consensus that such projects are in the best interests of the Districts and the communities we serve. Staff was directed to review the requests with the City of Buena Park and the City of Newport Beach/Hyatt Newporter Hotel for consideration of their 2 _ `� Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee Report May 30, 1991 water conservation proposals. Staff will maximize the data gathering aspects of the projects, analyzing performance to document water conservation's cost-effectiveness and report to the Committee later with proposed joint projects for consideration by the Directors. 2) RESIDUAL SOLIDS MANAGEMENT a. Alternative Sites Development Staff reported that in July 1989 the Boards of Directors adopted a 30-year Master Plan for the facilities and services needed to protect public health and the environment of Orange County through a balanced, technically sound program of wastewater management. A part of this program included adoption of policies for the management of wastewater residual solids, or sludge. The Boards' current sludge management policies can be summarized as follows: • Implement multiple, sludge management options under �..i suitable separate and various contracts to maximize interim and long-term residuals recycling while maintaining reliability. • Strive for 100% sludge recycling. • Maintain at least one in - county land management option as a backup. Implementing the last of these three policies will require an extensive effort by the Districts and consultants assisting the Districts. The -expected results of the effort will be to acquire the fee simple ownership of a site or the long-term unequivocal use rights to a property. With the site under Districts' control the Districts would proceed to design, construct, operate, maintain, monitor, and eventually close the residuals management site. A summary of the tasks and schedule associated with implementing this project is shown in Exhibit 1 and indicates successful completion is at least a five year effort. There are five residual management opportunities being considered at this time as follows: - 3 - Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee Report May 30, 1991 (1) Windrow composting of residuals with the flexibility to co-compost with yard waste material to assist achieving goals of AS 939 - the California Integrated Waste Management Act, which requires 25% and 50% reductions in landfilled waste by 1995 and 2000, respectively. (Approximately 40% of our sludge is now processed in this manner by private contractors. ) (2) Mechanical composting of residuals with the flexibility to co-compost with yard waste material. This system is typified by operating in an enclosed structure that uses less land than windrow composting, offering greater control over potential odor generation at a higher cost than windrow systems. The higher construction cost is usually somewhat offset by lower transportation costs since the mechanical composter can be located closer to the treatment plant. (3) Dedicated land application of residuals generating crops such as cotton for sale into the market. (Approximately 20% of our sludge is now managed in this manner by private contractors. ) (4) Dedicated land application of residuals generating high biomass crops such as corn or sugar beets that can be converted into alternative fuels including' methanol and ethanol. These fuels could be used in the Districts flexible fuel vehicle fleet and sold into the market. (5) Monofill system where residuals are placed in a residuals only landfill. In accordance with the Boards' recently approved Phase II Sludge Management Implementation Program, in the near future staff will issue an RFP for consulting assistance with this program. b. Potential Sludge Composting Site - Rancho del Rio As previously authorized by the Directors, the Districts' staff has monitored the proposed sale of the County's 214 acre parcel known as Rancho del Rio. Rancho del Rio is a property in South Orange County acquired by the County through a narcotics forfeiture in 1987. The potential of this site for a composting facility was first reviewed with the Committee in February. Since that time, staff has completed a project feasibility assessment. 4 `� Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee Report May 30, 1991 Staff and Mr. David MacDonald, principal of MacDonald- Stephens Engineers, the Districts' consultant, summarized a separate, enclosed (goldenrod) staff report and the consultant's Rancho del Rio Compost Site Feasibility Study pertaining to the viability of the Ranch del Rio site for residuals processing. Based on an overall assessment of the site, it was concluded that it does not appear to be an attractive option warranting further consideration. Committee Recommendation: The Committee recommends that the Rancho del Rio site not be pursued as a potential sludge composting facility based upon the edaluation and conclusions of the consulting engineer and staff. 3) WATER RECYCLING a. Southern California Waste Water Reclamation Backbone System Staff updated the Committee on Congressional action for Senate Bill 485. The legislation, to develop a regional (Southern California) reclaimed wastewater transportation network, introduced by Senator Bill Bradley of New Jersey, is �..i known as the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study Act. The bill was originally introduced in Congress as 5.2657 in 1990. 5.485 has been referred to the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. The prospects for adoption of the legislation appear slim as controversy exists over the role of the Bureau of Reclamation in this legislation. b. Funding of Joint Water Reclamation Projects with Orange County Water District and Other Agencies The staff reported that the Districts, in cooperation with the Orange County Water District (OCWD) , have performed several water recycling evaluations towards the Master Plan goal of constructing up to three new upstream water recycling plants. Funding support for these projects was authorized by the Boards in April 1987 in an amount up to $100, 000 as the Districts' share of joint projects with OCWD. Since then work has proceeded on several projects and with the completion of the Crescent Basin Feasibility Study, (Item 7 below) , the Districts authorization will be exhausted. The following table summarizes the projects and expenditures since 1987: \� 5 - Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee Report May 30, 1991 Prolect Description Total Districts' Cost Share (1) Green Acres Water $ 4,950 $ 2 ,475 Factory 21 Expansion Evaluation (2) Crescent Basin 29,924 14, 962 Recycling Plant Study (3) Waste Water Disposal 19,950 9,975 Company Initial Site Study (4) Areawide Recycle Water 100,000 50, 000 Marketing Master Plan (5) Unocal Feasibility Study 25,000 8, 333 (6) Waste Water Disposal 20,000 10, 000 Company Feasibility Study SUBTOTAL $199,824 $95,745 (7) Crescent Basin 28, 000 14,000 Feasibility Study (to be completed June 1991) TOTAL $227,824 $109,745 To complete the Crescent Basin Feasibility Study, (Item 7 above) additional work is required of the consultant, MacDonald- Stephens Engineers, costing more than the previously authorized contract of $25,000. To finalize the project cost estimates and expanded market assessment staff requested an additional $3,000, bringing the total authorized amount to $28,000. Staff further reported that in the near future the Districts and OCWD expect to jointly issue an RFP for an initial feasibility study on the Seal Beach Water Recycling Plant. This project will research alternative treatment plant locations, assess their feasibility, and better define the recycled water market in the vicinity. The study is expected to cost about $100, 000. The Districts share would be $50, 000. 6 - `� Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee Report May 30, 1991 The Committee discussed water recycling sites and alternatives, including possible joint projects with the Irvine . Ranch Water District (IRWD) and the city of Tustin, which could be located at the Tustin Marine Corps Lighter Than Air Station. It was the consensus of the members that the authority for conducting studies on potential feasibility and siting of joint water reclamation projects should be increased and expanded to include other agencies. Recommendation: The Committee recommends the following actions: (1) Amending April 1987 Board authorization re feasibility studies pertaining to joint water reclamation projects with the orange County Water District to authorize participation with OCWD and other appropriate public and private water and wastewater agencies relative to the feasibility of joint water recycling projects, and increasing the total authorized amount from $100,000 to $250, 000 for the Districts' share of said studies. (2) Authorizing issuance of Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 50395 to MacDonald-Stephens Engineering, increasing the `{ maximum authorized amount from $25, 000 to $28,000 for engineering services pertaining to the Crescent Basin Feasibility Study. C. Green Acres Phase II Funding Status In response to a Committee member's inquiry, staff reported that it had researched the status of State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) funding for the Orange County Water Districts' (OCWD) Green Acres Phase II Water Recycling Project. According to the OCWD staff, an acceptable agreement is being negotiated at this time with the Department of Fish and Game. Successful resolution of the controversy is expected soon, thereby allowing the SWRCB to approve the State Revolving Fund (SRF) loan in a timely manner. 4) Proposed Orange County Water Research Institute to be funded by Joan Irvine Smith) Director Swan advised that plans to form the proposed Orange County Water Research Institute were proceeding on track, and the next meeting was scheduled for June 4 at Irvine Ranch Water District headquarters. - 7 Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee Report May 30, 1991 Joan Irvine Smith has approached several water agencies in Orange County with an offer to fund water related projects that would benefit Orange County's water resources. Mrs. Smith is particularly interested in funding innovative programs that will have an ongoing benefit, such as desalinization, water reclamation, and toxic waste management. The Committee authorized and directed staff to work with the Irvine Ranch Water District to draft a joint proposal for consideration by Mrs. Smith. At a meeting held in Irvine on May 13 Mrs. Smith proposed a joint exercise of powers agreement to create the Orange County Water Research Institute with the stated purpose of undertaking research, development, and implementation of public water projects for the purpose of developing, conserving, and efficiently using water resources in Orange County. At the meeting Mrs. Smith also expressed an interest in ocean issues. The draft proposal includes the Irvine Ranch Water District, the Orange County Water District, the Municipal Water Districts of Orange County, the San Juan Basin Authority, and the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County as the members of the joint powers agency. Director Swan stated that the Institute would also be seeking financial participation by the member agencies. Staff reported that research is a major element of the Districts 30-year Wastewater Management Action Plan, 112020 VISION", and participation by the Districts in such a program for the purpose of developing, conserving, and improving water quality; preventing or remediating degradation of water quality; and protecting the beneficial uses of water resources for the benefit of Orange county's citizens was consistent with the Action Plan. Staff will represent the Districts at the June 4 meeting. 5) The next meeting of the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse. Committee is scheduled for August 1, 1991, at 5: 30 p.m. CGN:gab ref #130365.rp _ 8 _ `� ERRIS I y ACQUISITION OF IACAL DISTRICT SITES PROJECT SUMMARY TASKS ID Name 1 Select Consultant 2 Derme Site Requirements, Option, and Conceptual Design _ 8 Site Reconnaissance 4 Site Availability Analysis _ 6 Community Relations and Public Inrormation Program 6 Screen and Prioritize Site , 7 Recommend Candidate Sites 8 Develop Site Implementation Plans 0 Complete CEQA Process 10 Complete Permitting Process — 11 Complete Acquisition Negotiation 12 Site Predesign 18 Site Design — 14 Site Construction 16 Site Operation 11/16/06 Project: Milestone Date:0/26NO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS AI ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1 CBA14 ELLIE AVENUE F0 BOA 9127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92128-8127 _ May 23, 1991 I71AI962.2411 STAFF REPORT POTENTIAL SLUDGE COMPOSTING SITE Rancho del Rio BACKGROUND The Boards' adopted 30-year Master Plan, 112020 VISION" includes policies for the management of wastewater residual solids, or sludge. The Boards' current sludge management policies can be summarized as follows: • Implementation of multiple sludge management options, under suitable separate and various contracts, to maximize interim and long-term residuals recycling while maintaining reliability. • strive for loot sludge recycling. • Maintain at least one-in county land management option as a backup. In addressing the third of these policies, staff has monitored the proposed sale of the County's (Sheriff) 214 acre parcel known as Rancho del Rio. In order to keep the Districts options open, while evaluating the site, staff forwarded a letter to the County GSA Real Estate Division on behalf of the Sanitation Districts expressing potential interest in acquiring it as a possible site for sludge composting. The property has potential as a site for recycling wastewater sludge for beneficial reuse. Green waste could be directed from landfills to the site and composted with sludge to produce a soil amendment. Such a program would not only fit the Districts' overall wastewater management and environmental goals, but could also benefit the County and cities by helping to comply with the AB 939 recycling mandates. Rancho del Rio is a property in south Orange County acquired by the County through a narcotics forfeiture in 1987. Exhibit 1 is a vicinity map showing the property's general location, east of Ortega Highway and northeast of San Juan Capistrano. Exhibit 2 shows a more detailed site map of the rectangular parcel. The County's contract with the federal government stipulated that the property be utilized as a law enforcement training center within three years of the contract or be surplused. The County Supervisors have determined that a training center is not Staff Report Potential Composting Site - Rancho del Rio May 23, 1991 feasible, declared the property surplus, and have authorized the sale. The County has appraised the property at a minimum value of $1.54 million. Prior to sending the letter of interest to GSA, staff reviewed a site assessment report prepared for the County. Without the benefit of field reconnaissance, staff estimated that the property had potential for a Districts' composting facility and therefore warranted the letter of interest to the County. Over the past three months, staff has briefed the Committee on the results of preliminary field investigations, the preliminary assessment of advantages and disadvantages of the site, the acquisition process and the CEQA schedule. Staff was authorized by the Boards to conduct a more detailed feasibility assessment of the proposed composting site to determine if it warrants continued interest by the Districts and if so, at what purchase price? Staff has completed evaluations of engineering, environmental, regulatory, legal and other factors affecting the feasibility of this project and they are reported herein. PROJECT EVALUATION Overview The Rancho del Rio site is located 33.5 miles south of Fountain Valley in Southeast Orange County and is land locked with a single access off Ortega Highway. The single-lane dirt and gravel access road is entered through a locked gate at Verdugo Canyon and winds 3.5 miles through O'Neill Cattle Ranch property. The site and surrounding area is basically native chaparral used primarily for cattle grazing with a few isolated single family residences and small ranches. The relatively flat, approximately 50 acre central valley, contains numerous structures and improvements. The valley with rocky stream flora and fauna gives way easterly to steep canyon slopes and rolling chaparral hill tops. To determine the feasibility of the Rancho del Rio site as a composting facility for the Districts' residual solids, staff undertook a variety of tasks assisted by McDonald-Stephens Engineers (MSE) , K.P. Lindstrom Inc. (KPL) (environmental) and Rourke & Woodruff (R&W) General Counsel. 2 _ . . Staff Report Potential Composting Site - Rancho del Rio May 23, 1991 The technical engineering aspects were evaluated by MSE. The firm prepared an indepth report attached, Rancho del Rio. Compost Site Feasibility Study. May 1991. The emphasis of the work was to complete preliminary compost design calculations, equipment needs and site layouts for a facility at 500 wet tons per day and 1000 wet tons per day of residual solids. Additionally, MSE evaluated the potential access routes to the site, performed preliminary road design and developed initial project costs. This effort responded to needs for flood protection, regulatory permitting, utilities and the o¢erations and maintenance effort required of the Districts to operate such a site. The site capacities of 500 and 1, 000 wet tons per day of residual solids were chosen to reflect an initial project phase and the ultimate site capacity. These values compare to the Districts current average residual solids production of 875 wet tons per day. MBE completed preliminary dssiQn information for s windrow composting operation. In this case, no buildings were planned to enclose the operation. The evaluation included use of woodchips, sawdust and green/yard waste. Exhibit 3 diagrams the residual solids composting process. The results of the MSE evaluation concluded that the Rancho del Rio site is technically suitable for a windrow composting facility of residual wastewater solids up to 1,000 wet tons per day. A site layout for the operation is shown in Exhibit 4. Site Preparation To accomplish this amount of composting, approximately 50 acres of nearly flat land is required. At this site, to achieve the Districts' composting goals and provide storm water drainage, the 50 acres of flat land would be created from a cut and fill earthwork operation on the site using 2,500, 000 cubic yards of soil. This would result in a fill depth ranging from 5 feet to 80 feet over the valley portion of the site. As a result, all buildings on the valley bottom would need to be razed including the original ranch house. A total of 10 residences and buildings would be destroyed. only about one- fourth of the 214 acres would be usable. Also as a result of the cut earthworks about eight acres of potential habitat for the California gnat catcher would be eliminated. 3 Staff Report Potential Composting Site - Rancho del Rio May 23 , 1991 r..r Site Access MSE evaluated access to the site from Ortega Highway. The existing road is a single-lane unimproved dirt road over 3 .5 miles of Rancho Mission Viejo, managed by the Santa Margarita Company. As a part of the effort, MSE estimated that minimum safe access to and from the site for the Districts vehicles, local residents and ranch workers would require improvement of the road to a two-way, paved military road. This road type does not meet Orange County standards but would not need to as long as it was maintained as a private access easement. The main advantage of this road type is that the traveled way is only 23-feet wide compared to the county standard for a rural road with the traveled way equalling 36-feet. Speed of traffic on this road could not exceed 15 to 25 miles per hour (mph) depending on the location. An important factor of the military road is that it can be constructed within the existing 40-foot easement provided with this property. The easement width consideration is especially important given the response of the easement owner to inquiries regarding easement modification, expansion or purchase. Exhibit 5, attached, is a letter to the Districts from the Santa Margarita Company, the easement owner. The letter strongly states that the Districts intended use is incompatible, unacceptable and the ..i owner would not cooperate with the Districts in negotiating easement changes. According to the Districts' General Counsel, the Districts could well prevail in legal proceedings associated with this easement, assuming the issue proceeded that far, although it could be a costly and lengthy struggle. Proiect Costs In completing its work, MSE estimated the project costs associated with the construction improvements described herein. Exhibit 6, attached summarizes the construction, engineering, legal, administrative, land, operation and maintenance (O&M) costs expected for this project. The capital costs estimate equalled $32.4 million based on the minimum appraised land value established by the County. Combining the capital costs with annual O&M costs, the total unit cost estimate for the project ranged from $38.75 per wet ton for a 1000 tons/day facility to $57. 15 per wet ton for a 500 tons/day facility. The highest unit cost was for the smaller capacity project while the lowest unit cost was for the largest capacity project thereby showing the results of economy of scale for the project. The unit costs portrayed in the MSE report were determined using larger residual solids quantities than above. The larger - 4 - v Staff Report Potential Composting Site - Rancho del Rio May 23, 1991 quantities used by MSE assumed that residuals from south county treatment agencies would be absorbed into the facility as part of being a good neighbor. So as to not understate the true Districts' costs, the unit costs shown in this staff report reflect only the Districts' residual solids contributions. Comparison of Proiect Costs With Other Options Staff compared the costs of accomplishing the Rancho del Rio project to the Districts current practices and evaluations made in the Master Plan. The comparable current cost of the Districts' residual solids management is a weighted average of $27. 08 per wet ton. This value is conservatively high as it assumes no revenue credit from Pima Gro, a new contract provision recently approved by the Districts Board of Directors. Comparing Rancho del Rio cost estimates to current costs, it is evident that Rancho del Rio may be $11.67 to $30.07 per wet ton more costly than present practices. Over a 20-year project life, if conditions remained as they are presently, these additional expenses could cost the District $60.7 million to $78.2 million in todays dollars. .� Environmental Considerations Environmental considerations were evaluated by R.P. Lindstrom, Inc. To comply with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements for the potential purchase of this property, the Districts prepared an Initial Study and Negative Declaration of Significance. This document was publicly noticed and circulated per Districts procedures. The public comment period closed May 15, 1991. To date the Districts have received three comments. All three commentors were concerned about the District's proposal conflicting with site access over the existing road. Two commentors were concerned for the potential odors emitting from a compost facility while one commentor was concerned for groundwater contamination, bacterial and viral diseases associated with composting and vectors such as insects and rodents associated with composting. The environmental character of the Rancho del Rio site and access road is challenging for the Districts' potential composting facility. The site contains some sensitive wildlife habitat and is surrounded by zones of sensitive habitat. Although no known endangered species inhabit the site, a number of acres of the site are typical habitat for the California gnat catcher. This bird has caused extensive discussion and 5 - Staff Report Potential Composting Site - Rancho del Rio May 23, 1991 �. negotiation in the state as further development of Orange County is anticipated that may erode the limited habitat for the bird. The potential compost facility envisioned in the analyses could eliminate as much as eight acres of this typical habitat. Along the access road, the Districts suggested improvements would encounter small groves of old live oaks, San Juan Creek, Gabino Creek and other sensitive areas. Along Ortega Highway, within the city limits of San Juan Capistrano, live a number of citizens likely to be unfavorably impacted by increased truck traffic. Returning to the Rancho del Rio site, as discussed above under Site Preparation, the Districts proposed compost facility would require extensive soil filling of the La Paz Canyon Valley to achieve the relatively flat slopes needed for composting. This fill would cause the loss of all existing structures on the valley floor and significantly change the character of this portion of the La Paz Canyon. Regulatory and permitting needs for the project were developed through consultation with the Regional Water Quality Control Board, California Integrated Waste Management Board and Orange County Environmental Management Agency. A number of regulatory requirements were identified, all of which could be accommodated in the Districts site development. The most important constraint required a nearly impervious surface for the composting and storage areas. This criteria was achieved through the use of a bituminous asphalt pad. Research of zoning issues related to the site found that the site and vicinity is zoned agricultural and that a composting operation could be allowable. The County may require a use permit for the facility. FEASIBILITY CONSIDERATIONS A review of the potential project's advantages and disadvantages follows: ADVANTAGES 1) Relative remoteness suitable Verified for windrow composting operations 2) Adjacent properties agricultural Zoning verified Compatible; may require special use permit 6 - Staff Report Potential Composting Site - Rancho del Rio May 23, 1991 3) Property visible by few Verified 4) Impact to the few neighbors Verified would be minimal 5) Relatively close to the Districts' Verified in Orange facilities County, 33 .5 miles one way 6) Low cost of Land Verified when compared to north county land although on a useable land basis more expensive than projected in the Master Plan 7) No known endangered species on-site None observed though thorough site assessment not yet performed; habitat for sensitive wildlife (california gnat catcher) does exist onsite and would be affected 8) No development likely in Verified surrounding area for 10 to 20 years 9) Green waste diversion from Prima Feasible Descheca landfill and local nursery DISADVANTAGES 1) Most usable area in flood plain Manageable although requires costly earthwork of 2 .5 million cubic yards Only one-fourth of 214 acres is usable 2) Major flood protection facilities Manageable with needed concrete channels, pipes and storage 3) Some of the existing buildings and All buildings in risparian canyon habitat would be canyon and all destroyed to maximize site canyon habitat destroyed - 7 - Staff Report Potential Composting Site - Rancho del Ric May 23 , 1991 �.- 4) Access from Ortega Highway limited Manageable although with changes to gated entrance need to remove 30 large, old oaks 5) Long haul access road over narrow Difficult challenge; steep terrain on private property with Easement owner on limited easement record not in favor of any easement changes; Project infeasible unless road improvements made 6) Sensitive wildlife habitat Strong awareness of surrounds site vicinity by well organized environmental groups including Sea & Sage 7) Possible zoning change Not likely although County use permit probably needed 8) Acceptance by adjacant Problematic; Santa property owners Margarita Co. strongly negative 9) Truck traffic on Ortega Highway Some increased traffic 10) Parties interested in site for other Verified uses. The evaluation of overall project feasibility is not simply a matter of dollars and cents, especially when considering solids residuals projects. Given the sometimestenuous nature of residual management contracts and projects, under certain circumstances it may be desirable for the Districts to invest more than current costs would seem to justify. Of course such an investment would have other intangible benefits that could be very important to the Districts. The assessment of intangibles was conducted using a comparison of advantages and disadvantages previously reported for the project. Assessing intangibles was accomplished using a matrix of key factors. The table below summarizes staff judgements concerning nine intangible factors. - 8 - Staff Report Potential Composting Site - Rancho del Rio May 23 , 1991 ASSESSING RANCHO DEL RIO INTANGIBLES KEY FACTORS RATING 1) Ability to Implement Poor 2) Public Health & Environmental Good/Poor Risk 3) Flexibility to Adapt to Changing Fair Regulatory Requirements 4) Political Sensitivity Poor 5) General Public Acceptance Fair 6) Adjacent Public Acceptance Poor 7) Technical Feasibility Good 8) Districts Self-Sufficiency Good 9) Implementation Costs Poor Conclusions From the assessment of intangibles and a review of the potential project's advantages and disadvantages, several conclusions were drawn: (1) The proposal would face significant environmental impact on several issues including earthworks and sensitive wildlife habitat loss, (2) Access to the site is a difficult challenge and the project would be infeasible unless substantial road improvements are achieved, (3) Acceptance by adjacent property owners and site access easement owners not likely, (4) Projected costs one third to twice as costly as present methods of residuals management. Based upon the work completed on Rancho del Rio the potential composting site does not appear feasible at this time for the reasons enumerated above. CGN:mjs ref#130348.rp - 9 - EXHIBIT 1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY RANCHO DEL RIO COMPOST SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY Vicinity Map W WF 51'.VL 7y F J c�. � vwlmax 1 91 u m 55 vmx¢ 0 FRSi WK " 5 swu DISTRICTS ` C so Bucx 2 w RECLAMATION \ Cm rBuxrxx PLANT NO. 1 / M 0 M� xuxmw7o BF 74 DISTRICTS 41$510N x_m TREATMENT 5 mmullPLANT N0. 2 1 RANCHO DEL RIO PROPERTY sw wx I.AA cwstaww IVERSIDE CO. SAN DIECO 0. Owu vavrt Mc MBCDONALO-STEPNENS •7 ENGINEERS, INC. EXHIBIT 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY RANCHO DEL RIO COMPOST SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY Site Plan . 92 n- = I Q , _ R i MSF7 MacDONALO-STEPHENS ENGINEERS. INC. EXHIBIT 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY RANCHO DEL RIO COMPOST SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY Materials Flow Diagram Tub Grinder Amendment flDffsitel Delivery (i Residual Delivery Amendment Residual Loading Loading m m W indrow Construction o: I Windrow Mixing Windrow Removal Compost Storage Compost & Market Delivery Mc MacDONALD-STEPHENS i7 ENGINEERS, INC. EXHIBIT 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY RANCHO DEL RIO COMPOST SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY Site Layout ?^ 9t 0 GFNiFA C � ♦ _ "- V �NANiF1U110E SXEO / /♦ -- MIAN�OF VCO - XCIDMt•tlL — - __ _ MSF M.cOONALO-STEPHENS ENGINEERS, INC. EXHIBIT 5 SANTA MARC'�RITA COMPANY Es ' mEM,dIEEElE�ONYRMO1 ECIfIIVE Oii6En May Ma 13, 1991 Mr. Charles Nichols, Manager Conservation, Recycle and Reuse County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 SUBJECT: Potential Property Purchase Dear Mr. Nichols: Thank you for your April 23 note and the information relative to the proposal by the County Sanitation Districts to acquire the Rancho Del Rio property for use as a wastewater residuals composting facility. As you may be aware, Santa Margarita Company manages the portion of Rancho Mission Viejo over which the access easement to Rancho Del Rio crosses. Consequently, it is important that I respond. Please know that the purpose of the existing easement is to provide a convenient access route from Ortega Highway to a few isolated private residences and that, based on discussions with you and your consultants, we have evaluated to the extent possible given the information available, the potential impacts to ranch land. We and the landowners have strong reservations and concerns . regarding your proposed use. You indicated that you had not yet traveled the road that provides access to the site. I 'm sure that, once you have, it will become readily apparent to you that the increased use of this road by heavy trucks is impractical and unfeasible in its current condition. The road is narrow, winding, and unsuitable as a high use thoroughfare. Therefore, reconstruction of the road would be required to accommodate the intended use and would undoubtedly create unacceptable impacts to the land. 28811 ORTEGA HIGHWAY • P.O.BOX 9 • SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO,CA 92693 • (714)831-6450 The expansion and improvement of the road - as well as the resultant increase in traffic flow - is well beyond the level of use contemplated under the existing easement. Although the easement contemplates some increased usage, it was never the intention of the landowners that the use be increased to accommodate a commercial enterprise. For the record, now and in the future, Santa Margarita Company and the owners of the property, encumbered by the access easement, will not cooperate in any program to use the access road for any purpose beyond limited, private residential access. Very truly yours, ARM/ss cc: Richard J. O'Neill Alice O'Neill Avery v EXHIBIT 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY RANCHO DEL RIO COMPOST SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS Capital Costs Ultimate Phase I (1000 wet tons/day) (500 wet tons/day) construction Cost Subtotal (a) $26,841,000 $26,841,000 Engineering, Legal Administrative @ 15% 4,026,200 4,026,200 Land Acquisition (b) 1,540,000 1,540,000 Subtotal $32,407,200 $32,407,000 Total Annual Costs Amortized Capital Costs (c) $3,300,700 $3,300,700 Annual O 6 M Costs 6,773,800 4,128,300 Total Annual Costs $10,074,500 $7,429,000 Compost Unit Costs (d) $/ton (wet) $38.75/wet ton $57 . 15/wet ton (a) ENR - CCI = 5,930. (b) Minimum bid. (c) Capital Recovery Factor of 0.10185 for i = 8% and n = 20 years (d) Unit costs based on 1000 and 500 wet tons per day, 5-days per week, consistent with Districts current and projected residuals production. Ref. g130349.rp RANCHO del RIO COMPOST SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY PREPARED FOR 9�tT�TIQy�' C� �f £b f � CCC Oq ,. wry, MAY 1991 MSF MacDONALD-STEPNENS .r,�l ENGN ENS, INC. MacDonald-Stephens, Engineers, Inc. A CIVIL ENGINEERING COMPANY May 17, 1991 Mr. Charles G. Nichols Manager of Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92718-8128 SUBJECT: Rancho del Rio Compost Site Feasibility Study Dear Mr. Nichols: MacDonald-Stephens, Engineers, Inc. is pleased to transmit this report on the technical feasibility of developing a windrow composting facility on the Rancho del Rio property. This report addresses compost design criteria, site layout and site development, preliminary access route, geotechnical feasibility evaluation, and estimated project costs. The proposed project conforms with RWQCB criteria that have been required of similar composting facilities. The study has found that the Rancho del Rio property is technically suitable for a compost project, provided certain modifications are made to the site and the access road. The site can support up to 1000 wet tons per day (seven days per week). This includes the Districts' current residual solids production estimate of 1000 wet tone per day (five days per week), while allowing for potential changes in the secondary treatment requirements and/or providing for local participation by other agencies in the south Orange County area. The proposed access road improvements can limit the residual solids capacity. Based on a brief traffic flow analysis, it was concluded that a "military type" road, within the existing 40 foot wide easement, could support the estimated 1000 wet tone per day (seven days per week). With minimal road improvements (turnouts, slope work and culvert modifications),the capacity is approximately one-half, or 500 wet tons per day(seven days per week). These recommendations address the engineering aspects only, and certainly the legal and ownership issues related to the access road may be significant and require further analysis. The estimated project costs are summarized in Table No. I-1 and in all cases include full development of the site. These costs do not include the market value of the compost material. The 1000 wet tons per day operation is estimated at $27.60/wet ton. The 715 wet tons per day operation is estimated at$31.67/wet ton. The 500 wet tone per day operation is estimated at $40.71/wet ton. 26921 Crown Vaiiey Park Way Sune 200. Mission Viejo. California 92691 17141 582 9425 FAX 17141 562-8705 Mr. Charles Nichols May 17, 1991 Page 2 As noted in this report, there are other issues that should be addressed that were beyond the scope of this work. In addition to the access route easement, the other issues include: residual solids quality, marketing of the final product, availability of amendment, regulations and permits, and the environmental concerns. We hope this investigation will be helpful to the Districts in planning their residual solids projects and that we can be of service again in the near future. Sincerely, MacDONALD-STEPHENS ENGINEERS, INC. Ib) k.h .0 Da}r�d MacDonald Patty ➢fee .... PIJsp End. RANCHO DEL RIO COMPOST SITE FEASIHHITY STUDY May 1991 Prepared for County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Prepared by MacDonald-Stephens, Engineers, Inc. 26921 Crown Valley Parkway, Suite 200 Mission Viejo, California 92691 (714) 582.9425 ABBREVIATIONS ac acres cfs cubic feet per second cyld cubic yards per day dt/day dry tone per day FS Fixed Solids Ibs/cf or pcf pounds per cubic facet MPH miles per hour tons/day tons per day TS Total Solids VS Volatile Solids W ratio Mass ratio of water to organics (degraded) wUday wet tons per day RANCHO DEL RIO COMPOST SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I - 1 CHAPTER II INTRODUCTION II - 1 Background II - 1 Rancho del Rio II - 2 Purpose II - 2 Acknowledgements II - 3 CHAPTER III COMPOSTING FACILITIES III - 1 General III - 1 Process Components III - 1 Process Layout III - 4 Equipment Needs III - 6 Ultimate Conditions III - 8 Phase II Conditions 111 - 8 Phase I Conditions III - 9 Earthwork, Grading & Paving III - 11 Drainage and Flood Control III - 12 Other Site Considerations III - 13 Recommended Additional Work III - 13 CHAPTER IV TRANSPORTATION/UTILITY ACCESS IV - 1 General IV - 1 Potential Route Requirements IV - 6 Pavement Design IV - 7 Grading Design IV - 7 Structures IV - 7 Utilities IV - 7 Easements IV - 8 Conclusion IV - 8 CHAPTER V ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS V - 1 General V - 1 Basis of Cost Estimates V - 1 Construction Costs V - 1 Annual Operation & Maintenance Costs V - 2 Project Costs V - 3 910305 3 May 1991 LIST OF TABLES No. Description Pape I - 1 Project Costs 1 - 3 III - 1 Process Criteria III - 2 III - 2 Area Requirements III - 5 III - 3 Round Trip Travel Times III - 7 III - 4 Estimated Equipment Needs III - 10 IV - 1 Verdugo Access Road Alternatives IV - 3 IV - 2 Truck Trips (1000 wet tons/day) IV - 4 IV - 3 Truck Trips (500 wet tons/day) IV - 5 V - 1 Estimated Construction Costs V - 5 V - 2 Estimated Operation and Maintenance Costs V - 6 V - 3 Estimated Project Costs V - 7 V - 4 Estimated Unit Costs V - 8 LIST OF FIGURES II - 1 Vicinity Map II - 2 Site Plan III - 1 Windrow Sludge Composting Process Flow Diagram III - 2 Material Balance (with Wood Chip Amendment) III - 3 Material Balance (with Recycle Compost) in - 4 Materials Flow Diagram III - 5 Site Layout 1II - 6 Operations Building III - 7 Operations Area ill - 8 Earthwork, Grading and Paving III - 9 Drainage and Flood Control IV - 1 Transportation Access Alternatives IV - 2 Verdugo Route IV - 3 Verdugo Route IV - 4 Typical Road Section 910305 4 May 1991 APPENDIX Geologic/Geotechnical Evaluation 910305 5 May 1991 CHAPTERI MSF Executive Summary CHAPTERI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Rancho del Rio property, which is located in south Orange County off of Ortega Highway, is technically suitable for a 1000 wet tons per day windrow composting project, provided the appropriate improvements are made to the access roads and the site. The compost facility consists of windrow composting digested, dewatered waste- water treatment solids with a 20 to 22 percent solids content. The investigation included wood clips, sawdust, and compost recycle as amendments. It is antici- pated that in actual practice, a combination of amendments may be used or different amendments may be used during different seasons of the year. The compost operations included trucking of the dewatered wastewater solids from Districts' Plants No. 1 and 2 to the Rancho del Rio Compost Facility, as well as processing and trucking amendment from the Prima Deshecha Landfill. The final product will be suitable as soil amendment, with product delivery by others. Land requirements were estimated based on winter conditions and consist of emergency sludge storage, amendment storage, material mixing area, composting area, compost storage area, drainage retention area, maintenance shed, and the Operations Center. Approximately 46-68 acres are required for the processing of 1000 wet tons per day (seven day work schedule), depending on the amendment used and the processing of wood chips. The available area at the site is 51 acres. This investigation includes three alternatives: Ultimate 1000 wet tons per day, Phase H 715 wet tons per day,and Phase 1500 wet tons per day (based on a seven days per week production). The ultimate condition results in full development of the existing site and would allow other locally produced residual solids to be processed. Additionally, the ultimate project would allow for any changes in the future residual solids estimates, i.e. if additional secondary treatment is required. The Phase II project is the Districts' current estimate of year 2010 residual solids production and is equivalent to 1000 wet tons per day on a five days per week basis. The Phase I project is an estimate of the operations in the initial years. For all of these alternatives, the Rancho del Rio property was fully developed to the proposed 51 acre working pad. Incoming trucks shall deposit residual solids and amendment to separate storage areas. From these storage areas, the solids and amendment will be mixed and constructed into rows of compost. The compost process includes periodic turning of the piles. Upon completion of the composting, the finished product will be stored on site, with sufficient area for up to six months product storage. A screening facility is provided for wood chip recycling. This product is either trucked off-site for marketing/reuse or use as recycle compost amendment. 910305 May 1991 The Operations Center consists of the administration/operations building, diesel fueling facility, truck scales, truck washdown facilities, diesel generator, septage system, and parking. The operations building includes an administration office, lunch room, toilets and showers. The truck scales are a dual truck design for weighing materials as the trucks enter and leave the facility, as well as to assist in material balancing and proportioning. The utilities for the site include power, telephone, and water. Both the electric and telephone lines should be provided via the access road, with service from Ortega Highway. Standby generation of electrical power is also provided. The water supply consists of bottled drinking water, well water for in-building use, and retained surface water runoff for dust control and truck washdowns. An on-site septic tank/leach field system is provided for the building's wastewater. The capacity of the site is limited by the design of the access road. Improvements to the Verdugo access road are required to permit safe use of the road for a 1000 wet ton per day composting facility. If improvements are not made to the Verdugo access road, traffic flow would be reduced and the capacity of the site would be limited to 500 wet tons per day under closely controlled escorted operations. For purposes of this study, it was assumed that the road would be improved within its existing easement limits. The estimated construction cost (LA ENR Cost Index 5930) for this proposed project is approximately $26.8 million. Annual operations and maintenance estimates were $6.77 million, $4.96 million, and $4.13 million for the ultimate .� 1000 wt/day, Phase II 715 wt/day, and Phase 1500 wt/day projects, respectively. Project costs included construction, annual O & M, indirect services, and land acquisition (site and access road easement upgrades). For the ultimate 1000 wt/day project, the amortized total annual cost is $10,070,100, which is equal to $27.60 per wet ton at 20% solids. The Phase II 715 wt/day project is $8,265,000 total annual cost or equal to $31.67 per wet ton at 20% solids. The Phase 1500 wt/day project is $7,429,000 total annual cost or equal to $40.71 per wet ton at 20% solids. Table No. I-1 provides a summary of the estimated project costs. In addition to the engineering related elements that were addressed in this study, it is suggested that subsequent studies be directed to product marketing, amend- ment supply, contract deliveries versus Districts operated hauling, road easement upgrade, sludge quality and regulations, additional permits, environmental issues and legal concerns. 910305 1 - 2 May 1991 TABLE NO. I - 1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY RANCHO DEL RIO COMPOST SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY PROJECT COSTS Capital O & M Cost Cost Annual Cost (d) Element (a) 1000 ($1.0001YR(c) 1000/YR /Wet Ton Ultimate - 32,407 6,774 10,075 27.60 1000 wet tons/day Phase II - 715 wet/tona/day 32,407 4,964 8,265 31.67 Phase I - 500 wet/tons/day 32,407 4,128 7,429 40.71 (a) Seven days per week production. (b) Includes minimum bid ($1.5M) and estimated additional easement ($40,000). (c) Does not include product marketing. (d) Capital Recovery at 8% per year, 20 years (0.10185). 910305 1 - 3 May 1991 CHAPTER II M$F Introduction CHAPTER II M$F Introduction CHAPTER M MSF Composting Facilities CHAPTER II INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts) has accumulated over 35 years of experience managing the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal needs of the metropolitan Orange County area. Currently, the two District-owned and operated regional wastewater treatment plants process over 260 million gallons per day of wastewater and 875 wet tons per day (5 days per week) of wastewater residual solids. In 1989, the Districts' Boards of Directors adopted their 30 year Master Plan, known as "2020 Vision." This Master Plan identifies residuals management as a primary objective, and Board policies were established to: • Implement multiple sludge management options to maumize interim and long-term residuals recycling, while maintaining reliability. • Work towards a goal of 100 percent residual solids recycling. • Develop an in-County land management option. In implementing these policies, the Districts identified the Rancho del Rio (RDR) property as a potential compost site. Districts' staff has monitored the proposed sale of this property owned by the County of Orange (County). A Letter of Interest from the Districts was forwarded to the Real Estate Division of the County of Orange General Services Agency (GSA-RE), which is handling the sale of the property. Rancho del Rio is a property in south Orange County just south of Verdugo Canyon and Ortega Highway. It was acquired by the County of Orange through a narcotics forfeiture in 1987. Figure No. 11-1 is a vicinity map showing the property's general location, and Figure No. 13-2 shows a more detailed site map of the property. As part of the acquisition contract with the federal government, the County agreed to utilize the property as a law enforcement training center within the first three years of acquisition or otherwise sell the property as surplus real estate. The training center was determined to be not feasible, and therefore the property was declared surplus and is available for purchase. GSA-RE staff has indicated that a sales contract could be consummated by the end of 1991. The Districts' Conservation Recycle, Reuse (CRR) staff completed preliminary field and aerial inspections, and performed a preliminary evaluation of the RDR site for 910305 11 - 1 May 1991 a composting project. It was determined that a composting operation on this property appears to be viable and further site evaluation was deemed appropriate. The CRR Committee of the Board of Directors authorized further site investigations during its February meeting. RANCHO DEL RIO The Rancho del Rio property is a remote 213 acre parcel located southeast of Ortega Highway adjacent to the boundaries of Orange, Riverside and San Diego Counties. The site is located 33.5 miles from Districts' Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant No. 1 (Plant No. 1) in southeast Orange County and is land locked with several potential access roads. The present access is a dirt and gravel road that is entered through a locked gate at Verdugo Canyon and winds 3.5 miles through ONeil Cattle Ranch property. Refer to Figures No. II-1 and II-2 for location and site plan. The Rancho del Rio site and surrounding area is basically native chaparral used primarily for cattle grazing with few isolated single family residences and small ranches. As shown in Figure No. II-2, the relatively flat, approximately 30 acre valley area contains several structures and improvements. The valley with rocky stream flora and fauna gives way to steep canyon slopes and rolling chaparral hill tops. If the site proves feasible, wood waste could be directed from the local landfill to the site and composted with the residual solids to produce a soil amendment. Such a program could not only fit the District's overall wastewater management and environmental goals, but could also benefit the Counties and Cities by helping to comply with the AB 939 recycling mandates. PURPOSE The purpose of this report is to complete a technical feasibility study for the proposed composting project on the Rancho del Rio property. The primary emphasis of this work is to complete a preliminary layout of the compost facilities to process 1000 tons/day (wet) residual solids of 20-22% solids, based on five days per week. Composting design concepts and equipment requirements are to be developed, and a brief site assessment prepared. Potential access routes and preliminary road design are to be evaluated. Preliminary project costs are to be prepared. The technical approach to this reconnaissance-level study includes the following tasks: 1) Prepare a preliminary composting site layout and design criteria. 910305 II - 2 May 1991 2) Evaluate site improvements related to earthwork and drainagelflood control. 3) Identify transportation and utility access to the site from Ortega Highway. 4) Develop preliminary cost estimates for construction, operations and maintenance, and project costs. This study additionally investigated the marimum capacity of the RDR site, if fully developed, and a Phase 1500 wet tons per day project. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In conducting this study and preparing this report, this firm has been assisted by several individuals. Much of the information, on which this report is based, has been developed with the assistance of staff members from the Districts, County of Orange GSA-RE, and RWQCB. The study team wishes to aclmowledge their valuable assistance and cooperation. 910305 U - 3 May 1991 FIGURE NO. II-1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY RANCHO DEL RIO COMPOST SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY Vicinity Map xm is svac 5 \�Yp �i NLLERiOx C\ l 91 N EY 55 coRoxx PERR6 Eouc " "1 v�Ru DISTRICTS \\ OSUN euUx z """111 uu RECLAMATION \ cm cm �Eamux PLANT N0. 1 / Vu U l.J.� xUMVVON em. 74 DISTRICTS uissiox TREATMENT "R �' 1 5 ecw RANCHO DEL RIO PLANT NO. 2 / rRIVERSIDE PROPERTY sxuWISTRR10 CO. SAN DIEGO 0. pxW FpM Mti M•7 MacDONALD-STEPHENS ENGINEERS, INC. -ONI 'S833NION3 c'w, SN3Hd31S-OIVNOQO-N SW _ n ' r. m . m ueId 9P3 Aaf11S A111181SUA 311S 1SOdW00 Old 13a OHONba AiNnOO 39080 10 SiOldiS14 N011dlINVS AiNf100 a-u 'ON 7neiA CHAPTER M MSF Composting Facilities CHAPTER III COMPOSTING FACILITIES GENERAL The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts) operates and maintains two major wastewater treatment plants in Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach, California. The combined flow of these plants is approximately 260 mgd. The wastewater treatment process produces a residual solid material that is processed for stabilization by anaerobic digestion and dewatered by belt presses. The digestion process reduces the volatile solids content and biodegradable portion of the solids, thus producing a more stable and less putres©ble material. The belt presses remove excess extracellular water and produce a material cake with a 20 to 22 percent solids content. The Districts' wastewater treatment plants presently produces about 875 tonslday (wet) of residual solids (5 days per week). The amount is expected to increase to an ultimate volume of 1000 tons/day (wet) for five days per week For several centuries, residual material from wastewater has been converted to soil fertilizer and conditioner. The science of conversion by composting has advanced in recent decades. Due to the decreasing availability of landfill space for disposal of residual solids, greater emphasis is now being placed on recycling this material through the process of composting and the use as a soil conditioner. The purpose of this study is to determine the land requirements and technical feasibility of using the Rancho del Rio site as a composting facility for processing up to 1000 tona/day (wet) of residual wastewater treatment solids. The design criteria was based on a 1000 wet tons per day capacity (7 days per week). As later discussed, this is the maximum or ultimate capacity of this site, if fully developed. Phase lI and I conditions were also investigated and correspond to 715 wet tons per day and 500 wet tons per day, respectively. The 715 wet tons per day, seven days per week residual solids production is equivalent to the Districts' 1000 wet tons per day, five days per week residual solids estimates. The Phase I project is based on 500 wet tons per day, seven days per week. These three alternatives are all based on full development of the RDR property. PROCESS COMPONENTS To estimate the land requirements for this project, the composting process can be categorized into several subprocesses consisting of emergency sludge storage, amendment storage, material mi�nv area, composting area, compost storage area, drainage retention area, and the Operations Center. A general flow diagram for the windrow composting process is shown in Figure No. III-1. The process criteria, used in the study, are outlined in Table No. III-1. 910305 III - 1 May 1991 TABLE NO. III-1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY RANCHO DEL RIO COMPOST SITE PROCESS CRITERIA Sludge Production Daily Volume 1000 tons/day (wet) Moisture 80% Volatile Content 65% Density 68 pcf Emergency Storage Time 3 days Hours of Operation 7 days per week Amendment Type Compost Wood chips Dry Weight Ratio (amendment:sohda) 3:1 2.5:1 Daily Requirement (dry) 600 tons/day 500 tons/day Density 55 pcf 20 pcf Moisture 40% 30% Volatile Content 40% 95% Storage Time 3 days 3 days Compost Mixture Daily Volume (dry) 800 tons/day 700 tons/day Density 63 pcf 34 pcf Moisture 40% 41% Volatile Content 46% 86% W ratio (a) 16 3.5 Composting Time (winter) 35 days 28 days Compost Product Daily Production (dry) 110 tons/day 500 tons/day Density 55 pcf 55 pcf Moisture 61% 60% Storage Time 180 days 180 days (a) XC(1 - SC) + XAU - SA) + XB(1 - SB) + XR(1 - SR) W = XCSCVCkC + XASAVAkA + XBSBVBkB + XRSRVRkR 910305 1II - 2 May 1991 Because the processing of wastewater treatment residuals involves several unit processes (digestion, dewatering, and composting), each unit process operation should be scheduled to provide a coordinated flow of materials between unit processes. It is anticipated that solids and amendment deliveries would be on a five days per week basis. The composting operation, however, should be on a seven day schedule, and an area should be allocated for emergency storage of residual solids. Routine storage of residuals should be avoided since this practice could lead to the generation of malodorous gases. An area should also be provided for onsite storage of amendments. Amendments are used in composting as bullring agents to increase the initial solids content to a minimum of 40 percent, provide sufficient porosity to ensure adequate oxygen penetration into the compost pile and to maintain structural stability. Materials which are commonly used as amendments include (1) recycled compost, (2) sawdust and (3) wood chips. "Green" wastes (lawn clippings and vegetation) are sometimes added to the composting process. The type of amendment can impact the processing time. For example, sawdust will increase the carbon content in the pile, thus producing accelerated biological activity and early high temperatures. The potential for odors is also greater with sawdust than recycled compost. In actual practice, a combination of amendments may be used or different amendments may be used during different seasons of the year. For example, recycled compost may be used in the hot, dry summer months to minimi a the potential for odors and sawdust may be used during the cool, wet winter months to maintain the proper temperature and accelerate the composting process. Yard waste or "green" waste, which consists mostly of grass and leaves has been used as amendment in the composting process. Grass is a ready source of nitrogen that can lead to the release of ammonia under aerobic conditions or the amine compounds under anaerobic conditions. Grass and leaves are readily biodegradable and increase the demand for oxygen in the compost pile. This condition can lead to anaerobic conditions and the release of malodorous amine compounds. Upon decomposition, green wastes can produce a fine material which clogs the pores of the compost pile, thus reducing air flow and structural stability. A final compost product with a high percentage of fines is often undesirable. The composted green waste does not perform well as a bullring agent. Composting of green wastes and wastewater treatment residuals can be accomplished under proper management, if disposal of the green wastes is a primary goal; however the green waste is not a desirable bullring agent when other types of amendments are available. The area required for composting will depend upon the initial moisture content of the wastewater treatment residuals, the type of amendment, design of the windrow piles, and the ambient weather conditions. The residuals and amendment are mixed in the proper ratio to produce an initial moisture concentration in the compost pile of 60 percent or less. Higher moisture contents will result in low porosity of the pile with resultant low rate of temperature rise 910305 III - 3 May 1991 and anaerobic conditions. Recycled compost has a higher density than wood chips or sawdust; therefore, the initial compost piles will require less space. The composting area requirement for this project was estimated based upon the use of the Scarab 18 composting machine. This machine can mix large windrows with 18 foot bottom width and 7 foot height at a maximum rate of 3,000 tons/clay. An eight foot space between piles should be provided for equipment passage. The use of large windrows and large composting machines makes it possible to compost more residuals on a given unit area of land because the larger windrows have a lower surface to volume ratio. It has also been found that a lower surface to volume ratio will have a lower potential for the emission of malodorous gases. The weather conditions have a significant impact on the drying rate of the compost piles. Heavy rains will cool the windrows, thus reducing the rate of drying and the effectiveness of high temperature disinfection. The rain may also fill the air voids creating anaerobic conditions within the pile. Excessive rain can cause the windrows to slump, making it difficult to mix with the compost machine. The cool winter temperature reduces the biological activity of the compost pile, thereby increasing the drying time and making less land available for constructing new windrows. In this study, the land requirements were estimated based on winter conditions. A process material balance using wood chip and recycled compost amendments is shown in Figures No. III-2 and 1II-3, respectively. PROCESS LAYOUT Figure No. III-4 illustrates the proposed materials handling scheme for the Rancho del Rio Composting Facility. The proposed site plan for this facility is shown in Figure No. 111-5. The wastewater treatment residuals and composting amendments will be delivered to the site and temporarily stored at the amendment storage area and the emergency residual storage area. It is anticipated that wood chips and sawdust can be diverted from the Prima Deahecha County Landfill and delivered to the composting operation in sufficient volume to meet the process requirements. It may be beneficial to locate a tub grinder at the landfill to process the wood amendment and thus reduce the transportation needs between the landfill and compost facility. The public can continue to deliver yard waste and tree trimmings to the landfill and the material can be ground to sawdust or chips, as necessary, and diverted to the compost facility. This approach should be discussed further with the County of Orange Integrated Waste Management Department. The storage and mixing of the wastewater treatment residuals and amendments and the composting of these materials takes place in the main canyon, which is graded to an elevation of approximately 900 feet. The mixing is accomplished by loading the residuals and amendment into the truck trailer in the proper proportions and hauling the material to the windrow for placement and additional mixing. Following the compost period, the windrows are removed with a majority 910305 III - 4 May 1991 of the composted material being recycled to the amendment storage area and the remaining compost being hauled to the finished compost storage area. From this storage area, the finished product is either loaded for delivery to the market retailers or back to the storage area as recycle compost. The storage of the compost will take place in the easterly side canyon, which is also graded to an elevation of approximately 900 feet. Because the use of compost as a soil conditioner or fertilizer additive has a seasonal demand, the compost storage area should have sufficient space to stockpile a six month production of compost. The total area of the working pad, which is available for composting and compost storage, is 51 acres. The use of wood chips or sawdust as an amendment will add significantly to the volume of material to be handled. Considerably more product is generated using sawdust and/or wood chips, therefore, the stockpile area requirements are greater as shown in Table No. 1II-2. This area requirement can be reduced by screening and recycling the wood chips, however, the recycling of the sawdust would not be feasible. As indicated in Table No. III-2, the area requirements for the ultimate 1000 wet tons per day project (seven days per week) are 46.0 acres and 68.0 acres for compost recycle amendment and wood chips/sawdust amendment, respectively. As discussed, the actual operations will use a combination of amendments and, therefore, the area requirements will fall within the 46.0-68.0 acres range. Several earthwork grading plans were developed to attempt to maximize development of this site for composting. The selected grading plan provides 51 acres of working area and resulted in a balanced cut and fill entirely confined to the RDR property. Therefore, it can be concluded that the maximum or ultimate capacity of this site, if fully developed, is approximately 1000 wet tons per day. TABLE NO. III-2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY RANCHO DEL RIO COMPOSTING PROJECT AREA REQUIREMENTS (a) Compost Wood chips/ Recycle Sawdust Emergency Residual Storage 1.0 1.0 Amendment Storage and Mixing 1.0 2.0 Composting Area 30.0 36.0 Compost Storage 5.0 20.0 Drainage Ponds 5.0 5.0 Operations Center 4.0 4.0 46.0 ac 68.0 ac (a) Based on winter conditions. 910305 III - 5 May 1991 To the south of the composting area and compost storage area are the maintenance shed, the site drainage ponds, and the Operations Center. The Operations Center includes a building with a reception area/mud room, administration office, lunch room, toilets and showers. A floor plan of the Operations Building is shown in Figure No. 1II-6. The Operations Center will also include a refueling station, truck washdown station and two truck scales for weighing materials as the trucks enter and leave the facility. Due to the remote location of this facility, a standby electrical power generator is also included in the project. An overall site plan of the proposed Operations Center is illustrated in Figure No. III-7. EQUIPMENT NEEDS As indicated in Figure No. D7-4, the composting operation is equipment intensive. Equipment needs include truck hauling of residual solids from Districts Plant Nos. 1 and 2; processing of tree trimmings and green wastes by tub grinders; delivering amendment; loadmg/mixmg of residual solids and amendment into trucks; constructing the windrows by dumping the solids/amendment mixture; further mixmg/turningg of the compost piles; removing the finished compost to the storage/curing area; and loading and delivering the compost to the market retailers. These activities require tractor trailers for hauling and transporting, front end loaders to load the trailers, composters to mix and turn the compost piles, road graders for site maintenance, water trucks for dust control, tub grinders for processing the tree trimmings to sawdust and wood chips, and general service vehicles for the site. Equipment needs are dependent on the hours of operations and estimated travel time. The composting operation was developed for seven days per week and an eight hour daytime shift. For the purposes of this report, residual solids and amendment deliveries were based on five days per week and an eight hour daytime shift. Travel times were estimated on a round trip basis for residual solids and amendment deliveries. Table No. III-3 summarizes the estimated times for loading, hauling, unloading, and return trips. On average, it is anticipated that two round trip residual solids deliveries can be made for an eight-hour daytime shift per tractor-trailer. The amendment deliveries total four round trips per eight-hour daytime shift per tractor-trailer. Should the hours of operations, including hours per day and days per week, differ, the estimated number of vehicles will be impacted. In particular, it should be pointed out that the amendment delivery equipment estimates are dependent on the type and amount of amendments used. This work was based on wood chips used year-round. 910305 III - 6 May 1991 TABLE NO. I11-3 -- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY RANCHO DEL RIO COMPOSTING PROJECT ROUND TRIP TRAVEL TIMES Residual Deliveries Load Trucks at Districts Plants 15 minutes Haul to Ortega Hwy. and Verdugo Canyon Road 60 minutes Haul on Access Road 15 minutes Unload at Compost Site 15 minutes Return on Access Road 15 minutes Return to Districts Plants 60 minutes Drivers Rest 15 minutes TOTAL 195 minutes or 3Y4 hours For 8 Hour Shift 2 trips/day per truck Amendment Deliveries Load Trucks at Prima Deshecha 30 minutes Haul to Ortega Hwy & Verdugo Canyon Road 20 minutes Haul on Access Road 15 minutes Unload at Compost Site 15 minutes Return on Access Road 15 minutes Return to Prima Deshecha 20 minutes TOTAL 115 minutes or 2 hours For 8 Hour Shift 4 trips/day per truck 910305 ID - 7 May 1991 Ultimate Conditions (1000 wet tons ner day) Table No. III-3 summarizes the estimated equipment needs for the ultimate 1000 wet tons per day operation. Delivery of the residual solids would require 19 tractor trailers, with one standby. The amendment deliveries would involve 23 tractor trailers. On site, there would be two tractor trailers for the compost mix and transfer operation and two trucks for windrow removal; this would allow for one truck to be filling while the other one is being loaded. Additional tractor trailers will be involved with the removal of the finished compost product from the site to the market retailers. Because of their intermittent use, these trucks would be leased on an as-needed basis, or existing units could be used in a backhaul mode. Five front loaders are projected for the project. There would be two loaders for loading/mixing the residual solids and amendment into the trucks. One loader would be used in windrow removal and one for loading the compost recycle and/or finished compost. One unit would be standby. Additional loaders may be required to load the amendment and residual solids delivery trucks, but was not included in this estimate. The composters were estimated based on the Scarab 18 and included one standby unit. The road grader would be used for site maintenance. The two water trucks would be for dust control and for additional water as needed on the compost piles. The tub grinders would be located at the Prima Deshecha Landfill and were included as a capital expenditure. Seven portable screening devices, including one standby, were included for product processing. Three service vehicles were included. The total equipment needs include 48 tractor-trailers, five front loaders, four composters, one road grader, two water trucks, two tub grinders, seven product screeners, and three service vehicles. The Districts own nine tractors, eight trailers, and two composters. The tractor trailers are 8-10 years old, however, they may be serviceable for on-site transport of solids. The two composters are several years old and are smaller size units than the Scarab 18. While not usable at the ultimate 1000 wet tons per day capacity, these composters may be utilized in the early years. Phase D Conditions (715 wet tons/day) The equipment needs for the Phase 11 conditions are 36 tractor-trailers, four front loaders, three composters, one road grader, one water truck, two tub grinders, five screeners, and two service vehicles. Again, the Districts existing tractor-trailers and smaller composters could be used in the initial years. 910305 III - 8 May 1991 Phase I Conditions (500 wet tons/day) As shown in Table No. 111-3, the equipment needs are less for the Phase I opera- tion. Delivery trucks and product screeners are about one-half that required for the ultimate operation. There is one less front loader and one less composter. Of the three composters required, it is estimated that the District could purchase a new Scarab 18 and use the existing two smaller compost units in the initial years. 910305 III - 9 May 1991 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY RANCHO DEL RIO COMPOST SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY TABLE NO. III - 4 Estimated Equipment Needs Ultimate Phase II Phase I (1000 wet (715 wet (500 wet Item tons/day) tons/de tons/day) Tractor Trailer (40 cy) Residual Solids Delivery 20 15 10 Amendment Delivery (a) 24 17 12 Compost Mix/Transfer (b) 2 2 12 Windrow Removal (b) 2 2 2 Compost Market Delivery (c) (C) LCI 48 36 26 Front Loaders (5 cy) 5 4 4 Composters 4 3 3 Road Grader 1 1 1 Water Truck 2 1 1 Tub Grinder (d) 2 2 2 Product Screeners (e) 7 5 4 Service Vehicles 3 2 2 (a) Based on year-round use of woodchips. (b) Can use existing units. (c) Leased as needed or use existing units (backhaul only). (d) Offsite (e) Portable units 910305 III - 10 May 1991 EARTHWORK GRADING AND PAVING Figure III-8 shows the general grading plan for the composting site. Earthwork will begin with the removal of alluvium in the bottom of the two canyons. Material unsuitable for use in the fill will be removed from the site. The remain- der of alluvial material could be stockpiled for blending with other excavated material for use in the fill blanket. A fill blanket of 2.5 million cubic yards (which tapers from 80 feet to 5 feet thick) will be constructed in the existing canyon bottoms toward the north and the east. Material for the fill blanket will be obtained from the east ridge and the southwest MR. Fill slopes will be constructed at a 2:1 slope. Ten foot wide benches will be placed every 25 feet of height of the fill slope. The benches will contain gunite runoff- collection ditches in accordance with Orange County grading standards. The net effective slope from toe-of-bench to toe-of-bench will be 2.5:1 which the fill materi- al can safely sustain. Cut material for use in the fill blanket will also be graded with 2:1 slopes, ten foot wide benches and gunite runoff-collection ditches, as above. The resulting composting pad will be smooth, covering 51 acres, and having a uniform general slope of two percent downward from the northeast toward the southwest. About two-thirds of the pad will be underlain by fill material; the rem++—n n third will be graded directly on native material at the bottoms of the two cut zones. Two runoff water storage ponds will be cut into the south portion of the pad. One pond will have a capacity of 10 acre-feet, the other will contain 50 acre-feet. On- site runoff from the composting pad will be directed to these ponds as described in the next subsection. Pavement considerations will be based on requirements originating from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. The composting pad and ponds will have impermeable surfaces. The composting pad will require a four inch thick asphalt concrete surface placed over a 60 mil HDPE (plastic) liner designed to achieve the RWQCB maximum permeability requirements. A sandwiches layer of sand or other insulation will be required to prevent the hot asphalt from melting the HDPE liner. The ponds will be similarly constructed, but these may be required to achieve a more strin- gent permeability requirement. The perimeter of the entire composting pad will also be thickened with six inches of asphalt concrete, 40 feet wide, for a truck and trailer corridor and turning zone. 910305 III - 11 May 1991 This truck lane will also have to be underlain by sand and HDPE liner to achieve the required permeability requirement. DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL The California Regional Water Quality Control Board has required similar facility design to retain all runoff, including precipitation, within the stockpiling and compost areas that results from a 24-hour, 25-year frequency storm. Additionally, the site must be designed to prevent inundation from a 24-hour, 100 year frequen- cy storm. Both of these conditions can be met at the Rancho del Rio site. Rancho del Rio lies at the confluence of two small canyons. Toward the north is a watershed of about 1,600 acres in La Paz Canyon. Toward the east is a smaller watershed of about 500 acres in an unnamed canyon. There is also a small 120 acre draw to the northeast of the site which joins the La Paz Canyon watershed. A 100-year storm frequency hydrology was performed, using Riverside County Flood Control data and methods. The north watershed can be expected to peak at 1,100 cis (cubic feet per second) of storm water through the site during a 100-year storm. The east watershed can be expected to pass 400 cfs through the site. The northeast draw will add about 100 cfs to the north watershed runoff. Runoff from the La Paz Canyon watershed will be directed to the north collection point where it will be conveyed in a fourteen foot wide by seven foot deep concrete channel. This channel will flow along the west side of the site as shown on Figure III-9. No runoff from the composting area will be allowed to enter this channel. Runoff from the northeast draw will be directed to the northeast collection point where it will be conveyed under the composting area in a 48" diameter pipeline to the concrete channel. Hillside runoff(which is not to pass across the composting facility) will also be directed to the northeast collection point. Runoff from the east watershed will be directed to the east collection point where it will be conveyed in an 8 foot wide channel along the southeast side of the site. This will become a buried 8' x 5' concrete boa culvert as it passes under the composting facility. Hillside runoff will also be directed to the east collection point. Two chute-spillways will be constructed down the west embankment. The north spillway will be fourteen feet wide and the east spillway will be eight feet wide. The water energy will be dissipated at the bottom of each spillway, then these will join and discharge from the property at or near the presently existing creek bed. Facility on-site runoff will consist of. (1) process water draining from the composting and storage beds; and (2) all precipitation runoff draining across the facility. These combined runoffs will be kept on-site and directed to a 10 acre-foot pond which will accept the runoff. This pond will be designed to overflow to a 50 910305 lII - 12 May 1991 acre-foot storage and overflow pond. Water from the larger pond can be re-used for summertime composting process water. A portion of the hillside runoff just east of the ponds can be directed to the larger pond for storage in a dry year, or off-site in a wet year. All of the 100 year, 24 hour runoff can pass by or under the facility without inundating the site. The 25-year, 24-hour site runoff is approximately 28 acre- feet, which can be safely contained within the two ponds (60 acre-feet total) with an ample margin of safety. OTHER SITE CONSIDERATIONS The northeast slopes of east-west running canyons constitute the breeding and nesting habitat of the California gnat catcher. Although there has been no known sighting of this bird on the site to date, this indigenous bird is of considerable concern in southern California. About eight acres of potential habitat will be eliminated by the cut and fill of the canyons and hills. Approximately another eight acres of undisturbed habitat would lie within 300 feet of the proposed composting operations, although this undisturbed acreage may not be suitable for California gnat catcher nesting. This is an environmental matter which is not further addressed in this report. No reliable source of large quantities of industrial water for composting has been discovered on the site. Such a water source, if located on-site, could measurably reduce the anticipated cost of operations and during construction, the cost of earthwork. An adjacent landowner to the east lives in a large ranch home on the hill overlook- ing the site. The view from this home could result in an unobstructed view of a portion of the composting operations, which may be considered by the owner to be objectionable. RECOMMENDED ADDITIONAL WORK During the progress of this study, it became apparent that there were additional issues, beyond the scope of this work, that would require analysis. Certainly a key factor in the success of any composting project is the development of a dependable market for the compost product. The local ranches in this south Orange County area may have an interest in using this product. Additionally, it is our understanding that a major fertilizer/soil amendment supplier is in need of additional material. The inquiries made as a part of the study are cursory at best and require additional study. The development of a wood chipping/sawdust operation at Prima Deshecha will require additional discussions with the County of Orange Integrated Waste 910305 lII - 13 May 1991 cost amendment supply. Quantities and seasonal fluctuations would have to be confirmed, and a backup supply should be investigated. The Districts, in their experience of providing truck hauling of residual solids in- house, has found that hauling is more cost effective when contracted. Such contracts for residual solids, amendment, or product deliveries, were not investi- gated as a part of this work. The Regional Water Quality Control Board was consulted during this study. Their criteria for permeabilities, runoff and storm containment, and dustlodor control were used in the development of this project. Additional requirements, in particu- lar the "sludge regulations" as they relate to sludge quality characteristics and other permits, were not a part of this work The environmental issues were not specifically addressed in this report. 910305 lII - 14 May 1991 I I I FIGURE NO. M-1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY RANCHO Del RIO COMPOST SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY Windrow Sludge Composting Process Flow Diagram Amendment i STORAGE Compost Recycle 3 days Gas to Atmosphere I 1 I i i Residual EMERGENCY / Material STORAGE MIXING �L/ ` STOCKPILE Compost 20% Solids 3 days � j- 180 days Product WINDROWS 1 I Oxygen ,Supplied by Turning and Natural Ventilation Mr MacDONALD-STE'HENS •7 ENGINEERS, NO. FIGURE NO. M-2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY RANCHO Del RIO COMPOST SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY Material Balance (with Woodchip Amendment) COMPOSTING LOSS 880 tons/day 200tons/day. Vs 680 tons/day, H2O RESIDUAL SOLIDS COMPOST MIX PRODUCT iMlons7day, 20%T8 1710 tons/day, 41%TS 830 tons/day, 80RTS 2001ons/day, (dry) 700 tons/day, (dry) 500 tons/day, Idry1 865% v 86 8 tons/day, Hz0 1 tons/day, Hz0 301ons/day, H20 85X 9 88L Vs 01. V9 130 tons/day vs 605 tons/day vs 405 tons/day vs 70 tons/day is 95 tons/day Is 951ona/day Is 681bs/cl 34 bs/cf WINDROWS 551bs/cf 1090 cy/d 3730 cy/d 1 1120 cy/d I I 02 (WOOD CHIPS) 7101ons/dey, 70%TS 500 tons/day, Idryl 210 tons/day, H2O 95% vs 475tons/dey vs 25tons/day fs 20bs/cl 2840 cy/d M! MecDONALD-9TEPHENS •l ENGINEERS,(' l , , FIGURE NO. m-3 - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY RANCHO Del RIO COMPOST SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY Windrow Sludge Composting Material Balance (with Recycle Compost) COMPOSTING LOSS 820 tons/day 901ons/day, vs 730 tons/day, H2O RESIDUAL SOLIDS COMPOST MIX FINISHED COMPOST PRODUCT 10001ons/day, 20%TS 2000tons/day, 40%TS 1180 tons/day, 80%TS 180tons/day, 80%TS 200 tons/day, (dry) 800tons/day, (dry) 710tons/day, Idry) 110tons/day, (dry) BOO tons/day, H2O 1200 tons/day, H2O k470tons/daY. H 701ons/deY. H2O 85% vs 48% vs r- , - 40% vs 40% vs 130 tons/day vs 370tons/dey vs 280tons/dey vs 401ons/dey vs 70tons/day Is 4301ons/day is WINDROWS 430tons/day Is 70tons/day Is 88 bs/cf 83bs/cl 55IWO 55 bs/cf 1090 cy/d 2350 cy/d 1690 cy/d 242 cy/d I OZ (Air) RECYCLE 1000 tons/day, 50%TS 600 tons/day, (dry) 400 tons/day, H2O 40% vs 240 tons/day vs 380tons/day is 55 bs/cf 1315 cy/d M4r MecDONALD-STEPHENS •7 ENGINEERS, MC. FIGURE NO. M-4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY RANCHO DEL RIO COMPOST SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY Materials Flow Diagram Tub Grinder Amendment lOffsitel Delivery Residual Delivery Amendment Residual Loading �y Loading m T m WindrowConstruction Windrow Mixing Windrow Removal Compost Storage Compost & Market Delivery Mr MacDONALD-STEPNENS •7 ENGINEERS. INC. FIGURE NO. M-5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY RANCHO DEL RIO COMPOST SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY Site Layout - II^Ih 1 HTgU\8E� E —AY.0AA1ENf I A 1 eTOPAeE - - U � ♦ LOMPO6T - _ OVFAATpNB GENiEA D / - MSV MecDONALD'STEPHENS ENGINEERS. INC. FIGURE NO. M-6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY _ RANCHO DEL RIO COMPOST SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY Operations Building Approximate Area - 1200 sf 30'-0" scut ve- r-o MENS SHOWERS RECORDS / i 0 ADMINISTRATION MEN 0 I v MUD ROOM WOMEN LUNCH ROOM WO O❑ SHOWERS Mc MacDONALD-STEPNENS •l ENGINEERS, INC. COUNTY SANITATION DI; RANCH COMPOST SITE Opera 3 I \ � c O IESm Ol OPERATIONS BUILDING - - 4 02 STAFF PARIONG - - - O3 DIESEL FUEL FACILITY 40 DUAL TRUCK SCALES (100- LONG) 05 TRUCK WASHDOMN (100- LONG) © GENERATOR BLDG. (SFANDB1) 07 LEACH FIELD ,O. ti a ..ill?QIYNDGa.� _ O O L II � I II laanlro miarre II + II I I I w� sc a as a I Beiv SVi �l Aanis A1PII81m 0lu Ma AMOO 30NYHO to 81018 L3 'ON MnOW FIGURE NO. M-8 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY RANCHO DEL RIO COMPOST SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY Earthwork Grading & Paving FlLL BLAH(Ef Bl FLL BIANNEi fLL OPE CryT / POND MSF M.cDONALD-STEPHENS ENGINEERS. INC. FIGURE NO. M-9 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY RANCHO DEL RIO COMPOST SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY Drainage & Flood Control I •- �� ,.•wce a.rrt logos--i' _ ___= -- \ eauwar aua+ry oux� s e r m AVIt BZOBM.EO�:/ �wuos - ,owFi:ow; �yF . aosioaaoc - oa aware _ - maam - - evrQ MS MaCDONALD-STEPHENS ENGINEERS, INC. CHAPTER M MSF Transportation/Utility Access CHAPTER N 'TRANSPORTATION AND UTILITY ACCESS GENERAL At present, the Rancho del Rio site is accessible from the Ortega Highway along a 3-V2 mile dirt road known as the Verdugo route. Alternative access comes from the intersection of Christianitos Road and Avenida Pico near San Clemente along a 5 mile dirt road known as the Gambino route (see Figure IV-1). Both dirt roads are secured by gates at their beginnings. The shorter Verdugo route access road has been closely studied for this report. The longer Gambino route access road has been only generally studied Figures W-2 and IV-3 show the alignment and general terrain along the Verdugo route to the site. The present access road is graded earth, 15-20 feet wide for most of its length. Two shallow fords occur in the Gambino Canyon and the La Paz Canyon. The first 4,900 feet of this route pass through several oak tree groves while ascending gently at 2.5% grade. The neat 3,100 feet rise steeper at 8% grade, while also following the south face of a narrow canyon. Several pipe culverts pass under this portion of the road to prevent washout. The road crosses over a saddle in a gentle crest vertical curve for the next 500 feet. The following 3,400 feet of the road roll and curve gently downward at 3% to 5% grade until it ..r crosses the Gambino Canyon Creek ford, which is a shallow narrow crossing. After crossing the creek the road grade ascends rapidly for the neat 2,800 feet at an average slope of 10 percent. (The last 200 feet of this grade are the steepest along this route, at 18% slope). The top of this grade occurs abruptly in a 50' crest vertical curve having virtually no sight distance. For the next 2,650 feet the road meanders and descends at grades ranging from 3% to 10% until it crosses the La Paz Canyon Creek ford, which is a shallow, wide crossing. The last 600 feet of this route rise gently at 2.5% to the entrance of Rancho del Rio. While the Verdugo route had been most closely studied for this report, the Gambino route was studied and profiled from a USGS topographic map. This route begins near the proposed off-ramp of the Foothill Corridor (anticipated completion about 2001). Its grade averages 2% from Avenida Pico to the Rancho del Rio site. The terrain is gentler than the Verdugo route, generally paralleling the streambed of Gambino Canyon, then branching into the La Paz Canyon where it also parallels that stream. The Gambino route, while 50% longer than the Verdugo route, appears to be a much easier location to construct a new access road. It may be considered to be nearly economically equal to the Verdugo route for construction cost. 910305 IV - I May 1991 Before the construction of the Foothill Corridor, the Gambino route would be accessible only from Avenida Pico, which runs through the City of San Clemente, or from Christianitos Road, which is privately owned by Rancho Mission Viejo. . . These established paved roads may be limited in their accessibility to additional traffic. Special easements or permission may be required to use either of them. Whichever route is selected, the considerations of the adjacent landowners will be very important. The proposed traffic will be predominantly heavy trucks running continuously during normal daily working hours. The effects of this traffic upon the present land use and local environment will bring up issues which would greatly influence the route selection. This report does not address those environmental issues. There are three options to improving the Verdugo access route as summarized in Table No. IV-1. These options were based on the estimated frequency of truck trips. Table Nos. 1V-2 and IV-3 summarize the estimated truckloads per hour during the summer, winter, and spring/fall periods for the ultimate 1000 wet tons/day and Phase 1500 wet/tons/day projects. Based on an eight hour daytime shift and a five day per week delivery schedule, it is apparent that the ultimate 1000 wet tons per day operations would require access road improvements. The Phase 1500 wet tons/day project could be managed with minimal road improvements, provided the trucks were escorted into and out of the site and turnouts were provided. This cursory traffic flow analysis indicates the impact of the access road improvements to the capacity of the composting operations. The beet approach is to secure an additional easement width for a minimum 50 foot easement. This approach will allow the construction of a rural road to minimum county standards. This type of access would allow safe travel at a posted speeds of 30 and 35 mph. The second approach would be to improve the travel lanes of the existing road within the limit of the present 40 foot easement. This approach will permit a minimum military-type two-way road. The travel speed would be posted at 15 and 25 mph, depending on the location and line of sight distances. The third option would be to use the existing road in its present condition, without improvements. This third approach will require the shepherding or escorting of the truck traffic along the access road and would reduce accessibility of the site for full efficient use. For purposes of this study, we have assumed that the second approach, minimum improvements within the existing easement, can be implemented along the Verdugo route. 910305 IV - 2 May 1991 1 1 I TABLE NO. IV - 1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY RANCHO DEL RIO COMPOST SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY VERDUGO ACCESS ROAD ALTERNATIVES Overall Pavement Posted Access Road Alternative Width Speed Travel Time Comments Capacity County Rural Road 36' 30-35 MPH 10 minutes - Passing Allowed 1000 wt/day Military Road 23' 15-20 MPH 15 minutes - Passing Allowed 1000 wUday W wide gravel shoulders) Existing Road 15'-20' 10-15 MPH 20 minutes - Turnout required 500 wt/day (unpaved) - Minimum oncoming trucks - Shepherd required 910305 IV - 3 May 1991 TABLE NO. IV - 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY RANCHO DEL RIO COMPOST SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY TRUCK TRIPS 1000 wettona/day Residual 4-5 loads/hr Amendment 12loada/hr Compost Removal 30 loads/hr w/chips (seasonal) 6 loads/hr/w/o chips Summer 5 loads/hr Winter 17 loada/hr Spring/Fall 23 to 47 loads/hr requires mad improvements 8 hra/day, 5 days/week 910305 IV - 4 May 1991 TABLE NO. IV - 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY RANCHO DEL RIO COMPOST SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY TRUCK TRIPS 500 wet tons/day Residual 2 loads/hr Amendment Iload/hr Compost Removal 3 loads/hr (seasonal) Summer 2 loads/hr Winter 3 loads/hr Spring/Fall 6 loads/hr requires no road improvements 8 hrs/day, 5 days/week requires truck shepherding, one pass per trip (winter) 910305 IV - 5 May 1991 POTENTIAL ROUTE REQUIREMENTS. Both potential routes would have the same requirements, as follows: 1. The route must be capable of handling a high number of loaded and empty large vehicles daily. The large vehicles would be a combination of 40 cubic yard aemi-trailers, dump trucks with trailers, along with water trucks and fuel trucks. 2. The route should have a design speed of not less than 15 miles per hour, nor more than 25 mph. An average passage on the Verdugo route would take 15-20 minutes. The Gambino route would take 20-25 minutes travel time. 3. The route should be available as a utility corridor for overhead or buried power and telecommunication lines. As a consequence of the first requirement, a military-type two-way road using double course construction has been selected for its 31' wide roadbed (which should be contained within the existing 40' wide easement). Two travel lanes will occur in the 23' wide paved traveled way, while two 4' wide aggregate shoulders will also be used. See Figure VI-4 for a typical section view. This roadbed will accommodate all reasonable heavy vehicle traffic at design speed. The required pavement structural section would be tentatively a 4" thick asphalt concrete _ pavement over a 12" thick aggregate base. As a consequence of the second requirement, horizontal sight distance will be a minimum of 100 feet. The minimum radius of curvature is 150 feet without superelevation, or 100 feet with 2% superelevation. The steepest crest on the Verdugo route would require a 100 foot crest vertical curve, and a little earthwork. It should also be noted that the two steep grades on the "Verdugo" route will slow loaded trucks to about 8 mph within 2,000 feet past the point at which the grade exceeds 4%. The third requirement appears to have little technical impact upon the route design. Overhead poles or buried conduits for power and telephone could be installed on either side of the access route within the road easement. It should be noted that there may be local concerns regarding access for the utilities; the County of Orange Sheriffs Department indicated that there was considerable comments by local residents when temporary telephone cables were laid for President Bush's visit to the site. Local issues were not specifically addressed in this report. 910305 IV - 6 May 1991 PAVEMENT DESIGN The pavement for the access route must be designed for the predominantly truck loading it will sustain. The Geotechnical Feasibility Evaluation (see Appendix) recommends using a 4" thick asphalt concrete pavement placed over 12 inches of aggregate base. The asphalt concrete could be supplied from any of the plants in Orange County. The aggregate base could be economically manufactured on the Rancho del Rio site from in-situ rock at a temporary onsite rock crushing (aggregate) plant, specially brought in for this purpose. GRADING DESIGN Most of the route grading is intended to be done within the 40' easement along the existing roadbed. However, along the Verdugo route some slope grading outside of the easement will be required. Applicable slope easements will be required along these stretches of the Verdugo route. Route profile grades would generally match those of the existing dirt road, except for the 100' long crest vertical curve required on the Verdugo route. STRUCTURES In lieu of some slope work, retaining walls could be considered along portions of the Verdugo route. These would be ten to twenty feet high, placed on either side or both sides of the pavement. Culvert structures crossing under the pavement will be required at those locations where longitudinal storm water flow exceeds the capacity of the maximum size ditch which can be constructed wholly within the easement. No bridge structures will be required at any creek crossing. Concrete paved fords will be constructed instead; in keeping with a rural ranch style environment. UTILITIES Power and telecommunications could be brought into the site on an overhead pole line or buried conduit within the route right-of-way. Water service along the Verdugo route would be very difficult to install. The elevation differential from the Ortega Highway to the Rancho del Rio site is 400 feet; but the highest point on this route is 600 feet above the Ortega Highway. At least two pump stations (or possibly three) will be required to deliver any large enough quantity of water at a usable pressure to the site from the vicinity of the Ortega Highway. 910305 IV - 7 May 1991 Similarly, along the Gambino route from Avenida Pico to the site is a differential elevation of 520 feet. One or two pump stations would be required along this route alignment. For the foreseeable future, potable water will have to be trucked into the site. Industrial quality well water may be located within the project site. If so, this could be utilized for onsite needs such as toilets and showers. Pond storage, onsite, along with an onsite nonpotable well, could serve as a ready reservoir of industrial water for dust control and equipment washdown. Sewage lines are not a practical consideration. The site is remote, and a good quality septic system and leach field will be adequate for the sewage needs. EASEMENTS The Verdugo and Gambino routes pass through the O Neill Cattle Ranch and Rancho Mission Viejo property. (They may also pass through isolated other ranches.) At present the Verdugo route is contained within a forty foot wide non- exclusive easement. The Gambino route easement width is not known, but may be similar to the Verdugo route. The alignment of the paved access road would follow the existing dirt road easement. While keeping within the existing 40' wide easement, the road may also be required to weave between existing oak trees. Some special slope easements may be required along 3,000 to 4,000 feet of the Verdugo route. Permission to use the easements for heavy truck traffic may be required from the landowner. Access to the improved roadway along with other improvement benefits such as barb wire fences, gates, short driveway accesses, cattle guards, cattle crossing, and reseeding slopes, could be provided. It is also possible that a landowner may require financial consideration for expanded use of the easements as well. The cost estimate assumes approximately $2,000 per acre of easement for this possibility. The proposed easement or right-of--way was not within the scope of this work, however, it is an important consideration and requires additional work. CONCLUSION As far as transportation and utility access are concerned, the Verdugo route and the Gambino route appear equally attractive. What the Verdugo route sacrifices in complexity of construction is compensated for in the ease of construction of the longer Gambino route. The fact that the future Foothill Corridor is not scheduled for completion for another ten years makes the Gambino route slightly less attractive. An additional use easement would have to be obtained from Rancho Mission Viejo for use of its 910305 IV - 8 May 1991 paved Christianitos Road. Alternatively, a special use permit may be required from the City of San Clemente for using Avenida Pico. Either route could be utilized, for similar costs. Such factors as land ownership and environmental considerations will affect the final route selection. The road easement and/or right-of--way issue is an important consideration and may require a detailed traffic flow analysis. However, for the purpose of the cost estimate in the next section, the construction cost of the Verdugo route improvements has been used. Although the site can be developed for a 1000 wet ton per day composting facility, the practical capacity of the site will be determined by the design of the access road. For a 1000 wet ton per day facility, the minimum standards for a rural county road in Orange County is preferred. The 1000 wet ton per day capacity could be maintained with a narrower military type road, as assumed in the study. However, this type of road design would not provide the same level of safety as the county road and would be posted at reduced travel speeds. If the exiating Verdugo route is used, without improvement, the truck traffic should be escorted or shepherded from the entrance gate to the compost site and in the reverse direction. This approach would be necessary to maintain safe traffic conditions and would limit the delivery of material to the site. It has been estimated that with shepherded traffic to and from the site, the maximum capacity of the site during the winter condition (minimum amendment delivery) is 500 wet tons/day. 910305 IV - 9 May 1991 FIGURE NO. M-1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY - RANCHO DEL RIO COMPOST SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY Transportation Access Alternatives .) �� . !• ,. .. ';C'{/} ohs. 1l 1 VEROUOO ROUTE � i i1 l�4)(~CyyW``�1� L 1NR` MILES on `� SI N 11 {.I MMBINO ROUTE to „ 1� R a T 1 I •''I ."� . V L y fy 1 ' 1 V.11 11 `I Y J WWI! I� S• 51N', , MS M&CDONALD-STEPNENS R ENGINEERS, INC. COUNTY SANITATION DI RANCI COMPOST SITE Verd ORTEGA o 1fGIMAGHWAY O OAK GROVES (TYPICAL) NACCES8 ROAD W 8% GRADE o FIGURE NO. 12-2 >TRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY 0 DEL RIO FEASIBILITY STUDY ico Route �o N J w 8% GRADE ALONG CANYON WALL '4 pox GRADE � GAMB81O CANYON CREEK (SHALLOW FORD) M i C • �' � • �� c� � ���_ - �� �; � � � 1� ,, �1 �� �� ��� ��% !�� ��� ����, :1;,, , f `/;� , �- � . . . - . ,,,J I I FIGURE NO. IY-4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY RANCHO DEL RIO COMPOST SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY Typical Road_ Section 12" THICK BASE COURSE 31' ROADBED 4' 23' TRAVELED WAY 4' 4" THICK BASE 4" THICK AC COURSE SHOULDER SHOULDER in SURFACE COURSE SLOPED 1/2" PER FT. TWO-WAY MILITARY TYPE ROAD USING DOUBLE COURSE CONSTRUCTION. SCOURCE: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FIELD MANUAL FM 5-34 (1969) MSF MacDGNALD-STEPHENS ENGINEERS, MC. CHAPTER Y MSF Estimated Project Costs These construction costs were developed based on prevailing unit costs in the local area. The following unit costs were assumed: Site Earthwork (including water) $3.90/cy Sand Backfill $20/cy Asphalt $40/ton 60 mil HDPE Liner $0.60/SF Structural Concrete $350/cy Aggregate Base $30/cy Road Earthwork $3/cy Road Utilities $100,000/mile Irrigation Well $300/LF 8" Water Pipeline $56/LF Building $125/SF Easement Upgrade $2,000/acre As indicated, the estimated construction cost for the compost facility, access road, and appurtenances is $26.8 million. ANNUAL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS Operation and maintenance costs for the composting facilities include equipment, power, labor, and material and supply costs. Phase I, Phase II, and ultimate conditions were analyzed. The equipment costs for the ultimate, Phase II and Phase I projects are separately delineated in Table No. V-2, and were based on the estimated equipment needs developed in Chapter III. The estimated number of units is provided in parenthe- ses. This equipment is assumed to have a 10 year service life. The equipment costs were developed from discussions with local suppliers. Because of the large quantity of tractors and trailers, a preliminary bid quote was obtained. The remaining equipment costs were based on list prices. The following unit prices were assumed: Tractor $70,000 Trailer (40cy) $35,000 Front Loader (5 cy) $178,000 Composter (Scarab 18) $190,000 Road Grader $168,000 Water Truck $90,000 Screener $140,000 Service Vehicles $30,000 Bulking agent costs were determined using the quantities anticipated for the compost operation. This estimate does not include purchased costs, but rather 910305 V - 2 May 1991 CHAPTER V ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS GENERAL Preliminary cost estimates for the proposed composting project and access road are presented in this chapter. An itemized summary of both capital costs, operation and maintenance costs, and project costs have been developed for the three alternative projects. BASIS OF COST ESTIMATES Based upon the preliminary design criteria, layout of the compost facilities, preliminary alignment and design of the access road, and the Operations Center facilities, project costs have been developed. The cost estimates for completing the various proposed facilities assume that all construction work is performed in accordance with standard construction practices and competitive bidding. Esti- mated unit costs for construction items are based upon first-quarter 1991 price levels in Southern California (LA ENR 5930). Unit costs include materials, labor, overhead and profit, but do not include other indirect costs such as engineering, legal, and administrative or contingency costs. An additional 20 percent of the estimated construction cost is allotted for construction contingencies which are unforseen at this time. Contractor overhead and profit is considered to be 15 percent of the construction cost. The construction cost estimates presented in this feasibility report are based upon incomplete design and field information and are, therefore, preliminary and subject to change following the completion of field studies and final design. In particular, due to the extensive earthwork involved at the site and the access road, the overall project costs could vary considerably depending on the actual geotechnical conditions. CONSTRUCTION COSTS The construction cost estimate for the compost facility and access road are presented in Table No. VI-1. Construction costs are delineated into the major units of work for both the site and the access road. Demolition, site earthwork, concrete, and asphalt are included. The drainage pond, flood control structures and the nonpotable well system are delineated. Also included are the offsite wood chip facilities, Operations Center, road and appurtenances, security/access gate, and the revegetation work. 910305 V - 1 May 1991 assume tub grinding facilities owned and operated by Districts and located at the Prima Deshecha Landfill. It is anticipated that a lease agreement between the County of Orange Integrated Waste Management Department and Districts would provide a site at the landfill in exchange for disposing of tree trimmings and green wastes. Labor costs are based upon an estimated number of manhours required to maintain and operate the composting process and to deliver the residual solids and amendment to the project site. A labor rate of$30/hr including benefits was assumed for calculating labor costs. It was assumed that the ultimate plant staffing would consist of one plant supervisor, 15 on-site equipment operators, 42 truck drivers, two off-site grinder personnel, and three maintenance technicians. The Phase II project includes one plant supervisor, 11 on-site equipment opera- tors, 30 truck drivers, one off-site grinder personnel and two maintenance techni- cians. The Phase I project would have one plant supervisor, 11 on-site equipment operators, 21 truck drivers, one off-site grinder personnel, and two maintenance technicians. The facility would be maintained on an eight-hour basis with one shift per day and seven days per week. Truck deliveries would be on an eight- hour shift and five days per week. Thus, a total of approximately 2866, 2047, and 1686 man-hours per week would be required to operate the ultimate, Phase II, and Phase I projects, respectively. Power costs included electrical and diesel fuel consumption. Diesel fuel costs were estimated at $1.00 per gallon. Materials and supplies include those items necessary to the operation and maintenance of process equipment such as motor lubricants, belts, etc. Replacement of major equipment or facilities is not included in this cost estimate. The operation and maintenance costs for the compost facilities are presented in Table No. VI-4. The annual 0 & M costs are estimated at $6,773,800, $4,964,300, and $4,128,300 for the ultimate, Phase II, and Phase I projects, respectively. PROJECT COSTS Project costs have been developed for both the compost site and access road. Capital costs are obtained from adding the estimated constructions costs, indirect project costs and land acquisition. Indirect project costs include a 15 percent allowance of the estimated construction costs for engineering, legal, and adminis- trative services. This may include special investigations, geologic investigation, detailed design, contract specifications, construction staking, as well as contract administration and on-site inspection. For the purpose of this report, site acquisi- tion (minimum bid) and access road easement modifications were included. Capital costs are amortized over a 20 year period at an interest rate of 8 percent. The total project costs are presented in Table No. VI-5. As indicated, total annual costs are estimated at $10,074,500, $8,265,000, and $7,429,000 for the ultimate, 910305 V - 3 May 1991 Phase 11, and Phase I projects, respectively. It should be noted that the entire capital costs were attributed to all of the project alternatives. These project coats were divided into unit costs (dollars per wet ton). Unit costs were developed for the capital costs, annual operations and maintenance, and hauling (residuals and amendment) costs. As summarized in Table No. V-4, the ultimate, Phase 11, and Phase I projects result in unit costs of$27.60/wt, $31.67/wt, and $40.71/wt, respectively. It should be pointed out that these costs do not include the revenue potential of the finished compost product or the removal of this finished product from the site. 910306 V - 4 May 1991 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY RANCHO DEL RIO COMPOST SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY TABLE NO. V-1 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS (Ultimate 1000 wet tons per day) Item Total Demolition/Clearing 200,000 Site Earthwork 9,750,000 HDPE Liner and Sand Backfill 700,000 Site Asphalt 4,100,000 Drainage Pond & Appurtenances 500,000 Flood Control Structures 300,000 Nonpotable Well and Distribution System 200,000 Operations Center (a) 700,000 Access Road Paving and Grading 1,300,000 Access Road Structures and Bridges 250,000 Access Road Utilities 350,000 Security/Access Gate 100,000 Wood Chip Facilities (b) 500,000 Revegetation Work (c) 500,000 Subtotal 19,450,000 Contingencies ® 20% 3,890,000 Subtotal 23,340,000 Contractor's Overhead & Profit ® 15% 3,501,000 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS $26,841,000 (a) Operations Building, Diesel Fueling Station, Dual Truck Scales, Washdown Facility, Diesel Generator, Septage System, Paving and Grading. (b) Off Site (c) Site and Road 910305 V - 5 May 1991 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY RANCHO DEL RIO COMPOST SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY TABLE NO. V-2 ESTIMATED OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE COSTS Ultimate Phase D Phase I (1000 wet (715 wet (500 wet Eouinment Needs tons/day) tons/day tons/day) Tractors 3,360,000(48) 2,520,000(36) 1,820,000(26) Trailers 1,680,000(48) 1,260,000(36) 910,000(26) Composters 760,000(4) 712,000(4) 570,000(3) Front Loaders 890,000(5) 570,000(3) 712,000(4) Motor Grader 168,000(1) 168,000(1) 168,000(1) Water Truck 180,000(2) 901000(1) 90,000(1) Product Screeners 980,000(7) 700,000(5) 560,000(4) Service Vehicles 90 000 3 60 000 2 60,000(2) TOTAL $8,108,000 $6,080,000 $4,890,000 Amortized Costs (a) $1,208,300 $906,100 $728,800 Operations and Maintenance Amendment (b) 0 0 0 Labor 4,470,500 3,193,200 2,629,500 Material & Supplies 405,000 305,000 250,000 Power/Fuel 690,000 560,000 520,000 ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL O&M COSTS $6,773,800 $4,964,300 $4,128,300 (a) Capital Recovery Factor of i = 8% and n = 10 years (0.14903). (b) Assumes wood amendment produced at Prima Deshecha Landfill. Purchased amendment would cost approximately $9.50/cy. 910305 V - 6 May 1991 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY RANCHO DEL RIO COMPOST SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY TABLE NO. V-3 ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS Ultimate Phase B Phase I (1000 wet (715 wet (500 wet Capital Costs tons/day) tons/day tona/da Construction Cost Subtotal 26,841,000 26,841,000 26,841,000 Engineering, Legal, Administrative ® 15% 4,026,200 4,026,200 4,026,200 Land Acquisition (a) 1,540,000 1,540,000 1,540,000 Subtotal $32,407,200 $32,407,200 $32,407,200 Total Annual Costs Amortized Capital Costs (b) $3,300,700 $3,300,700 $3,300,700 Annual 0&M Costs 6,773,800 4,964,300 4,128,300 Total Annual Costs $10,074,500 $8,265,000 $7,429,000 Compost Unit Costs $/ton (dry) $27.60 $31.67 $40.71 (a) Minimum bid and estimated additional easement cost. (b) Capital Recovery Factor of i = 8% and n = 20 years (0.10185). 910305 V - 7 May 1991 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY RANCHO DEL RIO COMPOST SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY TABLE NO. V-4 ESTIMATED UNIT COSTS Ultimate Phase II Phase I (1000 wet (715 wet (500 wet tons/day) tons/day tons/day) Amortized Capital Costs $9.05 $12.65 $18.09 Annual 0 & M Costs (b) 8.27 8.67 12.16 Annual Hauling Costs (c) 10_28 10_35 10_46 $27.60/wt $31.67/wt $40.71/wt (a) Based on residual solids 7 days per week production. (b) Does not include market revenues. (c) Residual solids and amendment deliveries. 910305 V - 8 May 1991 MSF Appendix 10-M May 15, 1991 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc 26921 Crown Valley Parkway Suite 200 Mission Viejo, California 92691 Attention: Ms. Patty Lee Subject: Geologic and Geotechnical Feasibility Evaluation, and Recommendations for Additional Investigation Proposed Rancho del Rio Composting Site Orange County, California Gentlemen: 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 GENERAL This report presents the results of a geologic and geotechnical feasibility investigation of the proposed Rancho del Rio Composting Site in the La Paz Canyon area of southern Orange County. This study was performed for the Orange County Sanitation District as authorized by MacDonald-Stephen Engineers, Inc. (MSE). The objectives of this evaluation were to provide preliminary characterization of geologic and geotechnical conditions which may affect development of a composting facility at the subject site, and develop preliminary geotechnical recommendations for conceptual design. 12 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The project site is located approximately nine miles east of the City of San Juan Capistrano in the Santa Ana Mountains. The site is located within a portion of Orange County that was recently annexed from Riverside County. Access to the site is via dirt roads from California State Highway 74. The location of the site access road is presented on Figure 1. -1- MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc. May 15, 1991 10-083 Natural topography of the site is characterized by the north-south trending La Paz Canyon. The western ridgeline parallels La Paz Canyon, descends at a 2:1x (Horizon- tal:Vertical) inclination to the canyon bottom and is generally unbroken by drainage courses. The eastern side of La Paz Canyon consists of east-west trending dissected ridges bounded by major tributary channels of La Paz Canyon. Vegetation consists of moderately thick brush on the upper slopes with heavy brush and oak trees on the lower slopes. Various cabins and associated outbuildings are located throughout the site. 13 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Current feasibility-level planning indicates that the site will be developed by conventional cut and fill grading to construct a pad of 50 to 70 acres suitable for use as a composting facility. The pad will likely be paved with asphalt or soil cement. The proposed grading also includes an access road which may follow a route similar to the existing access road from the Verdugo Canyon Gate. 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES The scope of services for this investigation was established in the subcontract agreement with MSE dated April 8, 1991 and included the following: Evaluation of pertinent existing geologic literature and stereographic aerial photographs. Site reconnaissance to preliminarily assess relevant exposed conditions. Preparation of a report addressing the above listed topics and objectives. 3.0 GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS 3.1 GENERAL The subject site is located within the western portion of the Santa Ana Mountains within the Peninsular Range Geomorphic Province of southern California. The proposed com- posting facility is underlain mainly by the nomnarine Trabuco Formation, and generally consists of conglomerate. The access road is generally underlain by marine sandstones of the Williams Formation. 3.2 GEOLOGIC UNITS Geologic units located within the project area include undocumented artificial fill, allu- vium, slopewash and bedrock of the Cretaceous-age Trabuco and Williams formations. -2. MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc. May 15, 1991 10-083 as Approximate geologic contacts based upon previous investigations are presented on Figures 2a and 2b - Reconnaissance Geologic Map. General descriptions of the various geologic units within the site are presented below. 3.2.1 Surlcial Units Surficial units within the project area consist of alluvium, slopewash and undocumented artificial fill. Alluvium and slopewash were also found along the proposed access road alignment with limited amounts of undocumented artificial road fill. 3.2.1.1 Alluvium road • Alluvium occupies the major tributary stream channels and blankets the floor of La Paz Canyon. Alluvial materials generally consist of crudely stra- tified,sand,gravel, cobbles and boulders in a fine-to coarse-grained sand matrix. Depth to bedrock within the alluvial channels is largely unknown,but may range from 40 to 80 feet below existing ground surface. 3.2.1.2 Stopewash (Osw) - Slopewash generally consists of weathered bedrock materials transported downslope largely aided by uncontrolled surface drainage. Slopewash mate- rials mainly consist of clayey sands with abundant cobbles. Accumulations of slopewash are thickest at the base of slopes. Thickness of slopewash materials is generally unknown but is assumed to be as thick as 15 to 20 feet along the eastern side of La Paz Canyon. .... 3.2.13 Artificial Fill (af) - A limited amount of artificial fill is present adjacent to exis- ting buildings and roads. Fill materials appear to be uncompacted and consist of surficial and bedrock materials derived from building pad and road excavations. 3.2.2 Bedrock Units 3.22.1 Trabuco Formation (Kt) - The project area is underlain almost entirely by bed- rock of late Cretaceous-age Trabuco Formation. This unit consists almost entirely of thickly-bedded to massive, non-marine conglomerate. Rounded cobble-to boulder-size clasts occur in a coarse, silty sand matrix. The clasts consist mostly of granodiorite, and metasedimentary and metavolcanic rocks derived from older bedrock formations now exposed at higher elevations of the Santa Ana Mountains. Natural exposures are rare due to the highly erodible,weakly cemented nature of these materials. Fracturing is poorly expressed. 3222 Williams Formation - Schutz Ranch Member (Kws) - The Williams Formation underlies the southwestern portion of the project area and a majority of the proposed access road alignment. It generally consists of thickly bedded, fine-to coarse-grained, hard, moderately friable, slightly fractured, sandstone with scattered gravels and cobbles. Limited siltstone beds are present within the lower portions of this formation. -3- MacDonald-Stephens Engineers,Inc. May 15, 1991 10-083 3.3 GEOLOGIC STRUCTURE The regional strike of undisturbed bedding is generally north-south and dips westerly at low angles (5 to 15 degrees). Geologic structure within the Trabuco and Williams forma- tions tends to be poorly expressed due to the thickly bedded to massive nature of these materials. 3.4 LANDSLIDES No deep-seated landslides were confirmed within the project area or along the access road alignment. A possible large slide may be located near the mid-point of the access road alignment (see Figure 2b, identified as Qls). This questionable slide appears to be com- posed of materials derived from the Williams Formation. Realignment of the access road to the southwest may be all that is necessary to mitigate its potential effects on the roadway. Small shallow landslides are prevalent within the Trabuco and Williams formations. The slides generally form near the head of canyons during periods of heavy precipitation. Shallow landslides were observed within the project area and along the access road ahp- ment, but are generally too small to be mapped at the present map scale. Subsurface exploration should be performed to evaluate the limits and extent of these landslides during future investigations. 3.5 FAULTING The northerly-trending Cristianitos fault, which is located five miles southwest of the sub- ject site, is the closest major fault Although the Cristianitos fault is known to extend for at least 25 miles, numerous investigations indicate that it is not active (USNRC, 1980). The major active faults considered capable of inducing significant ground motion at the proposed site are the Newport-Inglewood, Whittier-Elsinore, San Jacinto and San Andreas fault zones. No active faults were observed within the project area or access road alignment during this study or previous investigations. 3.6 GROUNDWATER Groundwater is expected to be present within the alluvium of La Paz Canyon and may be subject to considerable fluctuations based on seasonal precipitation amounts. The groundwater is probably of marginal quality, is expected to be unsuitable for domestic use, and portions may be subject to contamination from onsite sewage systems. Depth to groundwater could not be evaluated within the scope of this study. -4- MacDonald-Stephens Engineers,Inc. May 15, 1991 10-093 Based on experience in similar hydrologic conditions it is anticipated that only a limited amount of water is available within the alluvial sediments. Comprehensive hydrogeologic investigation should be performed during the geotechnical investigation, if groundwater is to be used for construction purposes or during operation of the composting facility. 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 GENERAL Based on the results of this evaluation, it is our opinion the site geotechnical conditions would likely permit development of the proposed composting operations. No apparent geotechnical/geologic "fatal flaws" were observed. The above opinions are preliminary, consistent with the scope of services, and should be confirmed by additional investigation. The following sections discuss specific geotechnical conditions that require consideration during feasibility level design and additional investigation in the future. 4.2 SLOPE STABILITY Based on experience with similar cut slopes in similar materials with favorable geologic conditions, slopes excavated within bedrock materials of the Trabuco and Williams for- mations, are in general expected to be grossly stable when excavated at a 2:1 (Horizon- tal:Vertical) inclination. The possibility of gross instability may exist if unsupported geologic planes (e.g. bedding) are exposed. This may necessitate the construction of a buttress fill to support the slope. Subsurface exploration adjacent to proposed cut slopes and slope stability analysis should be performed to evaluate the possible presence of adverse geologic conditions and stability of the slope. Fill slopes constructed of materials derived from bedrock formations are also expected to be grossly stable when graded at a 2:1 (H:V) inclination. This is based upon experience with similar fill slopes and should be confirmed with laboratory testing of fill materials and slope stability analysis. Surficial stability of cut and fill slopes should be considered in future investigations due to the potential for severe erosion during periods of heavy precipitation. To mitigate this potential, all slopes should be designed with at least UBC-type benches and planted with deep-rooted light-weight vegetation as soon as possible following construction. Adequate drainage facilities should also be designed to direct runoff away from the slope face. 43 REMOVALS Materials unsuitable for fill support underlying planned fill areas should be removed prior to fill placement. The anticipated materials that should be removed include undocumented artificial fill, residual soil, portions of the alluvium, slopewash and weath- ered bedrock. -5- MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc. May 15, 1991 10-083 Thicknesses of unsuitable materials are unknown due to a lack of subsurface exploration data. Preliminary estimates based on field observations and experience with similar material types on nearby projects follow. Undocumented Artificial fill .............................................................. 1 to 15 feet Residual Soil overlying bedrock ......................................................... 3 to 5 feet Alluvium ................................................................................................ 5 to 10 feet Slopewash .............................................................................................. 5 to 20 feet Subsurface exploration should be performed to further evaluate removal depths and limits. 4.4 EXCAVATION CHARACTERISTICS Based on our observations and experience with similar materials, most rock and soil units exposed at the subject site are expected to be excavatable by conventional equipment used in normal grading (based on Caterpillar D-9 or equivalent). Difficult ripping may be encountered in localized areas of cemented sandstone or concentrations of boulders. The need for blasting appears unlikely, but cannot be precluded at this time. Gravel to boulder-size materials excavated from the Trabuco Formation and alluvium may be suitable as base materials for the access road upon crushing. Subsurface exploration and laboratory testing will be necessary to evaluate the potential quantity and quality of material available. 4.5 FILL MATERIALS Fill materials excavated from the subject site and access road are expected to be suitable for use as compacted fill. Due to the sandy nature of site materials substantial moisture conditioning may be necessary during compacted fill placement operations. The materials excavated and used for compacted fill will either occupy greater or lesser volume after compaction depending on their in-situ density and the actual degree of compaction achieved. Based on previous experience with similar mass grading operations, we suggest the following values for preliminary gross estimating purposes. Trabuco and Williams Formations Conglomerate and Sandstone .................. on the order of 5 percent bulkage to 5 percent shrinkage Alluvium ...................................................... on the order of 5 to 15 percent shrinkage Slopewash .................................................... on the order of 5 to 15 percent shrinkage -6. MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc. May 15, 1991 10-083 Additional subsurface exploration and laboratory analysis should be performed to ade- quately characterize fill materials. 4.6 CLAY LINER MATERIALS The potential for clay liner materials probably exists within the project area. Deeply weathered slopewasb and surficial landslide debris materials appear to have the greatest potential for use as clay liner materials. The volume of available materials may be limited. Another potential source of clay liner materials may be the clay beds of the Silverado Formation. Numerous mines producing clays for commercial purposes are located approximately four to six miles southwest of the project area in Cristianitos Canyon. Activity level of the mines was not verified for this study. Evaluation of clay liner materials should consist of laboratory and field permeability testing in conjunction with an assessment of availability. 4.7 ACCESS ROAD PAVEMENT DESIGN The design of pavement sections will depend on the support characteristics of the sup- porting subgrade soils and the expected traffic volume. For preliminary gross estimating .� purposes, four inches of asphaltic concrete over 12 inches of aggregate base materials appears to be an adequate pavement section as based on potential traffic volumes by MSE. The final pavement design should be based on the results of R-value testing per- formed on representative samples of specific subgrade soils exposed. 4.8 CORROSION POTENTIAL The corrosion potential of the organic materials to be composted at the site should be evaluated. This is an important consideration when designing the type of pavement and pipelines to be used on the subject pad. 4.9 ADDITIONAL EXPLORATION Additional exploration should consist of the following: Detailed geologic mapping of the project site and access road alignment. Excavation of bucket-auger borings to observe subsurface geologic condition adjacent to proposed cut slopes. ' Drilling of borings in alluvial areas to be covered by fill to evaluate liquefaction potential (if applicable) and removal depths. -7- MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc. May 15, 1991 10-083 Excavation of backhoe test pits to further characterize near-surface geologic conditions and evaluate removal depths. Laboratory testing to evaluate the engineering properties of site materials. Testing of gravel to boulder-sized clasts to evaluate suitability as a source of aggregate base materials for the proposed access road. Engineering analysis and preparation of a geotechnical report. 5.0 CLOSURE Our conclusions, recommendations and opinions presented herein are (1) based upon a review of findings of previous investigations of the site performed by others, (2) based upon interpolation of soil and rock conditions between, and extrapolation beyond obser- vation points, (3) subject to confirmation of the actual conditions encountered during exploration, and (4) based on the assumption that sufficient exploration will be provided by SDA. If there is a substantial lapse of time between the submission of our report and the geo- technical exploration of the site, or if conditions change due to natural causes or con- struction operations at or adjacent to the site, we urge that SDA be retained to evaluate the applicability of the conclusions and recommendations presented in this report considering the changed conditions and time lapsed. -8- MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc. May 15, 1991 10-083 Professional opinions presented in this report are based on evaluations of the technical information gathered, on our understanding the proposed construction as described above, and on our general experience in the geotechnical field. Our services were per- formed in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession providing similar services at the same time under similar conditions and locality. Accordingly, no warranty either express or implied is made con- cerning the performance of the project. If you have any questions concerning the infor- mation or recommendations contained in this report, please contact us. Respectfully submitted, SCHAE�FER/DIXON / ASSOCIATES, INC. Michael A. Cox �Jrt Lynn Senior Geologist Principal Geologist CEG #1488 CEG #727 MAC:RJL:kb\tooa3.noc .... Distribution: (5) Addressee wi .g. MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc. May 15, 1991 10-083 REFERENCES Morton, P.K, 1974, Geology and engineering geologic aspects of the south half of the Canada Gobernadora quadrangle, Orange County, California: California Div. Mines and Geology, Special Rept. 111. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1980, Safety evaluation report (geologic and seismic aspects) related to the operation of San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3, Docket Nos. 50.361 and 50-362, NUREG-0712. AERIAL.PHOTOGRAPHS REVIEWED DATE FLIGHT FRAMES APPROXIMATE SOURCE SCALE 12/14/52 AXK-4K 45.47 75-77 1" = 166T U.S.D.A 104-105 5/19/71 AXK-1MM 165-167 1"=1667' U.S.D.A 172-174 L aaldd deyy 11wl369w'l 1661 AVN alga £80-OL °' 1" d 31VOS 1334 OOOZI 000E 000► a NINON 3-MNVSaenb (E96I) VIMI03IT43 \\\NNNJJJ 'vmv vim 3NNIX 09r0E 5950 WM! dVW 3SV8 :310N •? a,� 1N3WN9Iltl avaa - ao w - SS 3] 3! XONddtl z OIltllal WTI ��'� _ n £%f'f�"' -- �� 1 C � � 5�r I rYa...'s �� c`/ _ .uvr1•C � r ago mrr�ovt vv v u X •evaa �n a uti nYs r+.w.v wir.w r.Y MY w�YyYY �, MAY 'lls'1�•1 Y���iY•Y Y w�Yw.Y ti wr wry Y.w+v o X X � X 4� X X X A \ M) S I^n \� x x x // xl III x � x / sM� / Ms OO � Ie0 M s x X 13 X W J W k H 2 w k X�* w w x X X X X-1A X X SEE FIGURE 2a FOR EXPLANATION x 11 asw Gy s� x Rai 1��� x C, X \ QS x Kw 1 \ ` � \ RECONNAISSANCE GEOLOGY Oal NAP PROPOSED RANCHO DEL RIC X COMPOSTING SITE k WS Associates Schaefer Dixon x PROJECT N0. 10-11 x DATE: MAY 1991 C_I FIGURE 2b s, Associates Schaefer Dixon I J Kt Kws \+ Kw� o \ W � w VJ \\ z as s EXPLANATION— w Surficial Units D8F ALLUVIRRG `+ Qsw SLOPDASN _ ,s QIS LANDSLIDE DEBRIS + + _Kws / Bedrock Units Ws NILLUM FOOMTIOO Kt TRAMUCO FORMATION Symbols aSw GEOLOGIC CONTACT. approximately 100114o. pal queried whem inferred. LAImSLIOE DEMRIS/1MITERIAL, arrows indicate 1 44 i direction of Probable movement, queried whom inferred. ( RELATIVELY SHALLOW LANDSLIDE OR CREEP ..i/ AFFECTED MEOPOCK, generally less than 10 feet thick. + + wr��r rr r r-um..r a�Y1G1 ! i r tM.m anO, R Y�yn IVrm I1 Ot in rq nAm Yll. NOTE: GEOLOGY MODIFIED FROM MINTON. 1974. iE -f= MOO It 4- y� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 39 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON MAY 89 1991 �/ 4 P. VATIO A •`mpeluae O IST GRgA'GE`COVN` ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S. 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held an May 8, 1991, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a guormn present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S. 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: x Dan Griset, Chairman Robert Richardson Charles E. Puckett, ChaiMR pro ten -7--Richard B. Edgar -7--Fred Barrera Gene Beyer 7--Roger Stanton —Don R. Roth x James A. Wahner _James Ferryman DISTRICT NO. 2: x Iry Pickler, Choi man Fred Hunter z John Collins, Chairman pro tem —George Scott =Fred Barrera —Gene Beyer =Bob Bell —Barry Denes 7—A.B. "Buck" Catlin —Chris Norby =William 0. Mahoney —James H. Flora -7—Robert H. Main —Norman Culver =Carrey J. Nelson —Glenn Parker z Arthur G. Newton _Carol Downey =Miguel Pulido Dan Griset =Mark Schwing —John M. Gullixson =Roger Stanton —Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 3: x Sal A. Sapien, Chairman Harry M. Dotson -7--Peter Green, Chai man pro tan —Earle Robitaille 7—Walter K. Bowman —Cecilia L. Age =A.B. "Buck" Catlin Chris Norby 7—John Collins —_George Scott =Noman Culver Robert H. Main x Burnie Dunlap —Carrey J. Nelson x James V. Evans _—Margie L. Rice =James H. Flora William 0. Mahoney x Don R. Griffin —Rhonda J. McCune -7—Pat McGuigan —_Robert Richardson =Keith A. Nelson Eva G. Miner `/ a Iry Pickler —_Fred Hunter =Roger Stanton Don R. Roth 7-Charles Sylvia —Alice Jempsa =Edna Wilson —Frank Laszlo DISTRICT NO. 5: x Evelyn Hart, Chai man Ruthelyn Plummer x Phil Sansone, Chaiman pro tem —John C. Cox, Jr. =Don R. Roth - _Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 6: x James A. Weimer, Chairman _Dick Sherrick =Ruthelyn Plummer, Chaiman pro tem Evelyn Hart =Don R. Roth —Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 7: x Richard B. Edgar, Chairman _Charles E. Puckett =James A. Wilmer, Chai man pro in _Nate Reade =Fred Barrera _Gene Beyer x John C. Cox, Jr. —Miguel Plummer =Robert Richardson Miguel Pulido =Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton =Sally Anne Sheridan _Barry Hammond DISTRICT NO. 11: x Grace Winchell, Chairman _Linda Moulton-Patterson a Jack Kelly, Chairman pro tern Jim Silva x Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth • DISTRICT NO. 13: x William D. Ehrle, Chairman Fred Hunter =Fred Barrera, Chaiman pro tem —Gene Beyer 7—John M. Gullixson Mark Schwing Glenn Parker =Burnie Dunlap =Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton DISTRICT RD. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chairman _Darryl Miller =Sally Anne Sheridan, Chai man pro ten _Barry Hammond =Fred Barrera Gene Beyer =Leslie A. Pontious —Richard B. Edgar z Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton -2- 05/08/91 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita J. Brown, Board Secretary, Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Corinne Clawson, Patti ' Gorczyka, Gary Hasenstab, Ed Hodges, Penny Kyle, John Linder, Charles Nichols, Bob Ooten, Jack Vincent, Kent C. Nelson, Catherine Biele OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel , Jamel Demir, Walt Howard, Bill Knopf, Mary Lee, Phil Stone, John R. Shaw x x x x x x x x x x x x x DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3 8 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and accept resignation of Mayor Dan Young of the City of That the letter from Mayor Dan Young Santa Ana and seating first and resigning from the Boards of Directors second alternates to the Mayor of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 7, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the following first and second alternates to the mayor be seated as members of the Boards: District Active Director Alternate Director 1 Dan Griset Robert Richardson 2 Miguel Pulido Dan Griset 3 Pat McGuigan Robert Richardson 7 Robert Richardson Miguel Pulido DISTRICT 1 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1. It was then moved: That Director Dan Griset be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Griset as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Charles E. Puckett be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Puckett as Chairman pro tem. -3- 05/08/91 DISTRICT 2 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2. It was then moved: That Director Iry Pickler be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Pickler as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director John Collins be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Collins as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 3 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3. It was then moved: That Director Sal A. Sapien be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Sapien as Chairman. �./ It was further moved: That Director Peter Green be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Green as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 5 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5. It was then moved: That Director Evelyn Hart be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Hart as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Phil Sansone be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Sansone as Chairman pro tem. -4- 05/08/91 DISTRICT 6 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6. It was then moved: That Director James A. Wahner be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Wahner as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Ruthelyn Plummer be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Plummer as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 7 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7. It was then moved: That Director Richard B. Edgar be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Edgar as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director James A. Wahner be nominated for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Wahner as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 11 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11. It was then moved: That Director Grace Winchell be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Winchell as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Jack Kelly be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Kelly as Chairman pro tem. -5- 05/08/91 DISTRICT 13 This being the annual meeting at which Annual a ec ion of Chai man an elections are to be held for Chairman Chaff man pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the \ri Boards of Directors, the Secretary • declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13. It was then moved: That Director William D. Ehrle be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chai man. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Ehrle as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Fred Barrera be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Barrera as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 14 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chal man and elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14. It was then moved: That Director Peer A. Swan be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Swan as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Sally Anne Sheridan be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Sheridan as Chairman pro tem. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman welcomed Presentation of District pin to new recently-seated Director Miguel Director Pulido Pulido. He then presented a pin bearing the Districts' logo to Director Pulido, who was absent from previous Board meetings when pins were given out to each Director. The pins are similar to the service pins given to employees and recognize the Directors for their service on the Board of the Sanitation Districts. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman reported on the Report of the Joint Chairman status of AB 854, the California Coastal Sanctuary Act of 1991. He advised that a draft resolution opposing the bill had been prepared for submittal to the League of Cities, and it would be introduced the following evening. Mr. Catlin also noted that the bill had been recently modified by its author, Assemblyman Lempert, and the provision that was of major concern to the Sanitation Districts, prohibiting treated wastewater below the secondary level after the year 2004, had been removed. He expressed the Boards' appreciation to the Districts' consultant, Kris Lindstrom, for his work with Assemblyman Lempert in order to get that provision removed from the bill . �./ The Joint Chairman also expressed appreciation to all of the Directors for their support and assistance in writing letters to the Assembly Ways and Means Committee Urging rejection of this provision of the bill . -6- 05/08/91 The Joint Chairman then announced that the Fiscal Policy Committee was scheduled to meet on Wednesday, May 15th, at 5:30 p.m. He also reported that the Joint Works Selection Committee was scheduled to meet on Wednesday, May 22nd, at 4:30 p.m., immediately preceding the Executive Committee meeting. Chairman Catlin then calleda meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, May 22nd, at 5:30 p.m. , and invited Directors Phil Sansone and Mark Schwing to attend and participate in the discussions. The Joint Chairman further reported that the Building Committee was scheduled to meet on Wednesday, May 29th, at 5:30 p.m. He also noted that the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee was scheduled to meet on Thursday, May 30th, at 5:30 p.m. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 10, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 10, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 10, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 10, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 10, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 10, 1991, nor the adjourned regular meeeting held April 18, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 10, 1991, the Chai man ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 10, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -7- 05/08/91 DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 10, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 4/10191 4/24/91 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 621,985.97 $ 843,603.17 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund 2,008,268.42 7,142,059.60 Joint Working Capital Fund - 183,639.90 177,775.07 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 222,305.90 14,533.50 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 1,913.09 2,313.61 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 11,916.94 42,954.09 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 33,894.58 11,943.64 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 134,790.24 33,319.08 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 182.15 14,586.97 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 145,662.01 140,516.92 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 37,907.58 13,327.14 D STRI T N . 13 - 46.26 9.13 IST I T NO. 14 - 725,139.85 37,579.95 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 8 6 JOINT - 4,117.94 4,966.01 ISTRICTS NOS. 6 6 T JOINT - 6,333.80 602.84 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 8 14 JOINT - 21.86 -0- 4,138,126.49 ,480,090.72 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Microcomputer Hardware, Software and Associated Per% herals, That the bid tabulation and Specification No. E-198, to fcroAge recommendation re award of purchase order contract for Microcomputer Hardware, Software and Associated Peripherals, Specification No. E-198, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase order contract be, and is hereby, awarded to MicroAge for a total amount not to exceed $30,876.00 plus sales tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Laboratory Services Contract for Analyses of Wastewater That the bid tabulation and and Sludge, Specification No. -050, recommendation re award of Laboratory to Montgomery Labs Services Contract for Analyses of Wastewater and Sludge, Specification No. S-050, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the bid of BC Analytical for Category II Organics, Metals, Nutrients in Sludge and the bid of MacDonald-Stephens Laboratories, Inc. for Category III Metals in Source Control Wastewater, be, and are hereby, rejected for non-compliance with the specifications; and, -8- 05/08/91 FURTHER MOVED: That purchase order contracts be, and are hereby, awarded for the period June 15, 1991 through June 30, 1992, with provision for a one-year extension, as follows: Estimated Amount During Contract Category Award To Period I Priority Pollutants Montgomery Labs $ 65,880 III Metals in Source Montgomery Labs 36,665 Control Wastewater $102,545 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change OEger No. 11 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 11 to the plans Job No. P1-33 and specifications for Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33, authorizing a net addition of $98,124.83 to the contract with Gust K. Newberg Construction Co. for ten items of additional or deleted work, and granting a time extension of nine calendar days for inclement weather, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Mer No. 10 to the ans and s ecifications for That Change Order No. 10 to the plans Job No. P1- 4-1 and specifications for Gas Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-1, authorizing an addition of $6,255.00 to the contract with Ziebarth 8 Alper for two items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 1 to the plans Nos. P1-34-3, P1-35-2 and J-21 and specifications for Construction of Digesters Nos. I1-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-3; Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-2; and Installation of Waste Digester Gas Flare Facilities at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-21, authorizing an addition of $151,460.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. for removal of an additional 1,630 cubic yeards of material from Digester 10, and granting a time extension of 28 calendar days to the milestone completion (bonus/penalty clause) date for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 1 to the That the Selection Committee be, and Professional Services A reement is hereby, authorized to negotiate with Dames Moore to conduct Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Seismic Study Elements of Job Services Agreement with Dames 8 Moore Nos. 1-38-3 and P2-43-2 to conduct Seismic Study Element of , Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-3, and Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-2, to provide for an expanded scope of work to include preparation of plans and specifications for Seismic Retrofitting of Headworks B and C at Plant No. 2. -9- 05/08/91 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit ro osals and negotiate That the Selection Committee be, and agreements for so 15, concrete and is hereby, authorized to solicit other materials testing services proposals and negotiate agreements for various collection system and for soils, concrete and other treatment plant projects materials testing services for various collection system and treatment plant projects to be constructed over the next few years. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement That the Selection Committee with Brown and Caldwell Consulting certification of the final negotiated Engineers for planning, design and fee relative to Addendum No. 1 to the construction services in connection Professional Services Agreement with with master-planned support Brown and Caldwell Consulting facilities at Plants 1 and 2 Engineers for planning, design and construction services in connection with master-planned support facilities at Plants 1 and 2 (includes Job Nos. J-11-1, J-26, J-27, P2-23-5-1, P2-35-2, P2-35-3, P2-35-4 and P2-35-5) providing for additional design services, cost escalations, deletions and changes to the original scope of work, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 91-65, approving Addendum No. 1 to said agreement with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for said additional services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $24,224.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $865,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $889,224.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Replacement of Judge Truck Scale at Treatment Plant That the bid tabulation and No. 2 Specification No. R-037 to recommendation re award of purchase Scott Co. order contract for Replacement of Sludge Truck Scale at Treatment Plant No. 2 (Specification No. R-037) , be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase order contract be, and is hereby, awarded to Scott Co. for the total amount of $61,300.00. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Author zing the Negotiated Sale of Surplus Digester Gas-Fueled Engines That the Negotiated Sale of Surplus pecification No. 5-052 Digester Gas-Fueled Engines (Specification No. S-052) , be, and is hereby, authorized, as recommended by the Purchasing Manager and Assistant Director of Maintenance; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute necessary agreements/documents in connection therewith, in form approved by the General Counsel . -10- 05/08/91 ALL DISTRICTS The staff reported that the South Referring matter re 5CAQ D Permit Coast Air Quality Management District for Air Pollution Control Systems (5CAQMD) had ruled that the for Standby Generation Equipment, Districts' five 1300 kw emergency Specification No. E-17 -1, back to standby mobile (trailer-mounted) staff and Executive Committee for generator sets are "stationary further study and recommendation sources" rather than mobile sources, and, therefore, subject to Regulation XIII, which requires "best available control technology" (BACT). This ruling effectively means that emission control equipment, estimated to cost $1 million, would be required on these units; otherwise, SCAQMD would not permit them to operate more than 56 hours per year, which could effectively render them useless if they had to be pressed into emergency service in the event of a failure of other power sources. Staff noted that the proposed agenda item requesting authorization to solicit a proposal and negotiate a Professional Service Agreement with Carleton Engineers and Consultants, Inc. for preparation of specifications, construction support services and permitting assistance re Air Pollution Control Systems for Standby Generation Equipment, Specification No. E-179-1, was being presented for the Boards' consideration now to provide for timely completion of the project in order to ensure compliance with said SCAQMD regulation. Following a lengthy discussion, during which the Board members expressed considerable concern over the SCAQMD requirement, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the matter relative to the South Coast Air Quality Management District " Permit for Air Pollution Control Systems for Standby Generation Equipment, Specification No. E-179-1, Including authorization to solicit a proposal and negotiate a Professional Service Agreement with Carleton Engineers and Consultants, Inc. for preparation of specifications, construction support services and permitting assistance re said standby equipment, be, and is hereby, referred back to staff and the Executive Committee for further study to determine if and how it might be appropriate to get SCAQMD to reconsider their ruling. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written report of the Executive Committee That the written report of the Executive Committee's meeting on April 24, 1991, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS The Chairman of the Fiscal Policy Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee reviewed the outcome of the Committee and finance team on the sale on April 17th of the Series B 1990-92 Series B Certificates of Certificates of Participation Issue Participation Sale approved by the Boards at the April loth Board meeting. He reported that the interest rate was 6.86% for the $117,555,000 issue. The Director of Finance further reviewed the terns of the Series B transaction, summarized in the Pricing Book which had been provided to the Directors that evening. 'Mr. Streed noted that copies of the Official Statement had also been provided for the Directors' information. He indicated that he would be available to answer any questions the Directors might have concerning these complicated transactions and agreements. -11- 05/08/91 4� ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Pendin lassif cation and mpensation Resolution No. 79-2 That the Boards of Directors hereby as amended, establishing a 1 91 adopt Resolution No. 91-66, Amending Summer Work Program Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, establishing a 1991 Summer Work Program for painting, grounds maintenance and pump station maintenance work. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving First Amendment to the Second Amended Joint Powers That the Boards of Directors hereby Agreement Confirming the Creation adopt Resolution No. 91-67, approving of an Agency Known as the Southern First Amendment to the Second Amended California Coastal Water Research Joint Powers Agreement Confirming the Project Authority SCCWRPA Creation of an Agency Known as the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority (SCCWRPA) , providing for continuation of SCCWRPA for three years, from July 1, 1991 through June 30, 1994. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving documents relative to a trio ements with Southern That the following documents be, and alifornia Edison Company for are hereby, approved, relative to parallel operation of power necessary arrangements with Southern generating facilit es and for California Edison Company for purchase and sale of excess power parallel operation of power in connection with the new Central generating facilities and for Power Generation 5 stem at purchase and sale of excess power in reatment Plant No. 2 connection with the Districts' new Central Power Generation System at Treatment Plant No. 2: (a) Application and Contract for Added Facilities for metering changes (estimated monthly cost is $9,401.00) (b) Uniform Standard Offer 1, As-Available Capacity and Energy Power Purchase Agreement (refundable deposit in the amount of $60,000.00 required as a project security fee) (c) Uniform Standard Offer 1, Interconnection Facilities Agreement (Appendix G to As-Available Capacity and Energy Power Purchase Agreement) for additional facilities (estimated monthly cost is $10,795.00 to commence after start-up of Central Power Generation System) (d) Application and Contract for Electric Service to provide standby power when needed by the Districts (estimated monthly cost is $2,375.00 for standby service, plus cost of power actually used) ; and, L FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute said documents, in form approved by the General Counsel . -12- 05/08/91 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: kEng the regular July 1991 meetig of the Joint Boards of That the regular July 1991 meeting of Directors from July 1u, 1991 to the Joint Boards of Directors, be, July 172 1991 and is hereby, changed from July 10, 1991 to July 17, 1991 to avoid a conflict with a statewide conference of the League of California Cities in Monterey scheduled for July 10-12, 1991.ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written report of the Conservation, That the written report of the Recycle and Reuse Committee Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee's meeting on April 25, 1991, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement for Remova and u1sposall That Amendment ND. 2 to the Agreement Reuse of Districts' Residual Solids for Removal and Disposal/Reuse of with Pima Gro Districts' Residual Solids with Pima Gro Systems, Inc. , providing for a two-year extension of the term of the agreement from June 1, 1991 through May 31, 1993, with option for up to three additional one-year renewals, subject to CPI increase limits, establishing the cost based on a variable rate ranging from $27.00 to $30.60 per wet ton, depending upon the quantity of solids removed, providing for inclusion of provisions in the agreement to implement a cost recovery or revenue fo rtmula to provide the Districts with a percentage of the revenue earned by Pima Gro from the sale of the Districts' residual solids after fixed costs are recovered, and to allow the Districts or Pima Gro to seek contract cost adjustments in the face of extraordinary price increases or decreases, be, and is hereby, approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute said Amendment to form approved by the General Counsel. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: ecelve, file and approve written report of the Building Committee That the written report of the Building Committee's meeting on April 30, 1991, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 5. 6, 11 8 13 Public hear nq and adoption of ordinances increasing sanitary sewer service charges Public Hearing The Joint Chai man announced that this was the time and place fixed by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 11 and 13 for a public hearing on the following proposed Ordinances, Amending Ordinances Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: Amending Repealing District Ordinance No. Ordinance No. Ordinance No. 1 118 109 116 2 213 210 N/A 3 316 309 314 5 525 516 523 6 619 609 617 11 1115 1108 1113 13 1310 1303 1308 -13- 05/08/91 Open Public Hearing The Chairman declared the hearing open at 8:18 p.m. Verbal report of General Counsel The Districts' General Counsel reported that the proposed ordinances, providing for adjustments to the sanitary sewer service charges, were introduced for first reading at the April Board meeting. He stated that no changes had been made. If adopted, the ordinances will take effect July 1, 1991. Close hearing The Chairman declared the hearing closed at 8:20 p.m. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 118 That proposed Ordinance No. 118, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 109 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 116, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 118 by title only. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried by Adopting Ordinance No. 118 the following roll call vote: AYES: Dan Griset, Chairman, Fred Barrera, Richard B. Edgar, Roger R. Stanton, James A. Wahner NOES: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 118, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 109 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 116, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 213 That proposed Ordinance No. 213, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 210 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 213 by title only. -14- 05/08/91 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried by Adopting Ordinance No. 213 the following roll call vote: � - AYES: Iry Pickler, Chairman, Fred Barrera, Bob Bell , A. B. "Buck" Catlin, ' John Collins, William D. Mahoney, Robert H. Main, Carrey J. Nelson, Arthur G. Newton, Miguel Pulido, Mark Schwing, Roger R. Stanton NOES: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 213, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 210 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 316 That proposed Ordinance No. 316, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 309 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 314, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 316 by _ title only. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried by Adopting Ordinance No. 316 the following roll call vote: AYES: Sal A. Sapien, Chairman, A. B. "Buck" Catlin, John Collins, Norman E. Culver, Burnie Dunlap, James V. Evans, James H. Flora, Peter Green, Don R. Griffin, Pat McGuigan, Keith A. Nelson, Iry Pickler, Roger R. Stanton, Charles E. Sylvia, Edna Wilson NOES: None ABSENT: Walter K. Bowman That Ordinance No. 316, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 309 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 314, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 525 That proposed Ordinance No. 525, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 523, be read by title only; and, , FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 525 by title only. -15- 05/08/91 DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried by Adopting Ordinance No. 525 the following roll call vote: AYES: Evelyn Hart, Chairman, Phil Sansone, Don R. Roth NOES: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 525, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 523, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 619 That proposed Ordinance No. 619, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 617, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 619 by title only. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried by Adopting Ordinance No. 619 the following roll call vote: AYES: James A. Wahner, Chairman, Ruthelyn Plummer, Don R. Roth NOES: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 619, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 617, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 1115 That proposed Ordinance No. 1115, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. it of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1108 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1113, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 1115 by title only. -16- 05/08/91 DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried by ,Adopting Ordinance No. 1115 the following roll call vote: AYES: Grace H. Winchell , Chairman, Jack Kelly, Roger R. Stanton NOES: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 1115, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1108 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1113, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: econtl Read in of Pro osed Or inance No. 131 That proposed Ordinance No. 1310, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1303 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1308, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 1310 by title only. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried by Adopting r inance No. 1 10 the following roll call vote: AYES: William D. Ehrle, Chairman, Fred Barrera, Burnie Dunlap, John M. Gullixson, Don R. Roth NOES: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 1310, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1303 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1308, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICTS 1 2 3 5, 6 11 8 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Direct n t e Count Auditor- on rol er o Include sewer sery ce That the Boards of Directors hereby charges on property taxIlls adopt the following resolutions Commencing with 1 91-9 fisc� directing the County of service charges on the property tax bt Auditor-Controller to include sewer Sanitati on Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 11 and u 13tofoOrangeances County, County 9 commencing with the 1991- 2 fiscal year: District Resolution No. Ordinance No. 1 91-68-1 I18 2 91-69-2 213 3 91-70-3 316 5 91-71-5 525 6 91-72-6 619 ' 11 91-73-I1 Ills 13 91-74-13 1310 Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. -17- 05/08/91 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Convene in closed Se H2 pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9 The Boards convened in closed session and 54957.6 at 8:25 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9 and 54957.6. ALL DISTRICTS At 9:07 p.m. the Boards reconvened in Reconvene in regular session regular session. ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel reported that the Actions re claims and pending Boards of Directors, in the course of litigation entitled U.5. Government, the closed session held pursuant to at al . v. Montrose Chemical Government Code Section 54956.9, Corporation, at al . reviewed the claims and pending litigation entitled U.S. Government, et al. v. Montrose Chemical Corporation, et al . He further reported that the Boards determined, during closed session at their meeting of March 13, 1991: (1) to provide the full cost of legal defense for each of its 25 member agencies on the condition that the liability was related to sewer discharges as distinguished from other sources of possible damage which may develop in the litigation; provided (2) that the member agencies fully cooperate, including providing information relating to a tender of defense to any and all insurance carriers; and (3) to enter into a mutual agreement to withhold filing cross-complaints against each other and to reserve the right to adjudicate any disputes subsequent to the conslusion of the present litigation or by settlement and dismissal of all member agencies. Mr. Woodruff also advised that during closed session that evening, the Boards of Directors approved the Districts Indemnifying each of their 25 member agencies for any losses relating to this litigation, subject to the same conditions previously established when approval of the legal defense was adopted. He noted that the action of the Boards in closed session provided for this defense through the legal firm of Rourke 8 Woodruff, which has been designated to provide the defense for the Sanitation Districts. In the event any member agency chooses to provide its own defense, the Districts will not be responsible for payment of any fees or costs incurred. ALL DISTRICTS Upon return from closed session, the Authorizing settlement of Workers' General Counsel reported out the Compensation Claim of June Steffen action taken by the Boards relative to settlement of a Workers' Compensation claim filed by a former District employee, June Steffen. He advised that the Districts' outside Special Counsel had negotiated a proposed settlement in the amount of $12,000.00, less the credit for advances against permanent disability already received. The Directors, during closed session, `../ concurred with that recommendation and authorized said payment. -18- 05/08/91 Ali ALL DISTRICTS - - Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving MDU with Operations and Maintenance Employee Unit That Memorandum of Understanding with Operations and Maintenance Employee Unit, represented by the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 501, ALF-CIO, for a three-year period, be, and is hereby, approved for the period November 30, 1990 through November 25, 1993, in accordance with the action taken by the Boards in closed session on May 8, 1991. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, That the Boards of Directors hereby as amended, and Terms and adopt Resolution No. 91-79, amending Condition of Employment Resolution Classification and Compensation No. 79-21, as amended, re changes Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, and in salaries and benefits for Terms and Conditions of Employment Operations and Maintenance Resolution No. 79-21, as amended, Employee Unit incorporating changes in salaries and benefits for Districts' Operations and Maintenance Employee Unit effective as provided in the Memoradum of Understanding with said unit. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:07 p.m. , May 8, 1991. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate a Professional That the Selection Committee be, and Services Agreement with Willd is hereby, authorized to solicit a Associates for preparation oan f proposal and negotiate a Professional Project Report re portion of Services Agreement with Willdan Contracts 2-14-3 and 2-14-4 Associates for preparation of a Project Report on Portion of Santa Ana River Interceptor, between Grove Street and Yorba Park (Contracts 2-14-3 and 2-14-4) , to evaluate alternatives for accommodating planned development. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file request for annexation and authorizing That the petition from Merel Sexton initiation of proceedings re requesting annexation of 1.01 acres proposed Annexation No. 71 - (two single-family homes) of Sexton An territory to the District in the vicinity of Timkin Lane and Coyote Lane in the City of Anaheim, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 91-75-2, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District (proposed Annexation No. 71 - Sexton Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -19- 05/08/91 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 72 - Trider y. Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 91-76-2, ordering annexation of 6.687 acres (10 single-family homes) of territory to the District in the vicinity of Sycamore Street and Santiago Boulevard in the City of Villa Park (Annexation No. 72 - Trider Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2) . Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman - then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:07 p.m. , May 8, 1991. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications for Contract No. 3-24-2 That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 91-77-3, approving plans and specifications for Lampson Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-24-2, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and deny claim of John Leyendecker That the claim of John Leyendecker dated March 18, 1991, in the amount of $1,100.33 for damage to his vehicle allegedly caused by an open District manhole in Imperial Highway, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the District's General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:07 p.m. , May 8, 1991. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:07 p.m. , May 8, 1991. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:07 p.m. , May 8, 1991. -20- 05/08/91 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering That the Selection Committee Corporation for design of Contract certification of the final negotiated No. 7-16 fee relative to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle . Engineering Corporation for preparation of drainage studies and design of Lemon Heights Sewer System, Contract No. 7-16, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 91-78-7, approving said agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $33,560.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:07 p.m. , May 8, 1991. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of _ Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:07 p.m. , May 8, 1991. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:07 p.m. , May 8, 1991. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:07 p.m. , May 8, 1991. �W Secretary of WE Boartls of Directors of County Sanitation Districts ' Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 � -21- F.q 9199 JT DIST VOPKING CAPITAL ( RE PORTSNING UMBEATE g4103191 PAGE 1 \\\` COUNTY SANITATION 31ST41-TS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/10/91 POSTIN2 DATE 04/10/91 WARRANT NO. VENDOR A53UN1 DESCRIPTION 113467 AARON OP014ERS ART MARTS 119.42 FRAMING SERVICES 113469 AIR COLD SUPPLY INC S36I.25 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 113469 41ROUEST ENVIRPMENTAL CO. $153.10 TRAINING REGISTRATION 113410 AMERICAN DISTRICT TELEGRAFH 5210.89 SECURITT SYSTEM PARTS 113471 AMERICAN LOCK 0 SUPPLY INC 1679.25 BUILDING MATERIALS 113972 BLAKL P ANDERSON t1.931.35 - TRAVEL 6 MEETING EXPENSES 113473 CVIRLES E. ANOERSOV S2.319.30 FIRE HYDRANT CLSANING 113474 ASSOC. ADMINIS. 6 CONSULTANTS $229.53 MEDICAL CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR IIS475 ANSA 1365.19 TRAINING REGISTRATION 113476 RALPH V ATKINSON C719.23 PUMP PARTS 113477 NANDOLPH AUSTIV CO 93,315.57 LAE SUPPLIES I1341R AUTODESK 410A GENERIC fIl.t1T.99 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 113479 FALCON DISPOSAL SEPVICE f61.R11.In GRIT REMOVAL M.0.7-13-88 II3480 BABSON B SMEPPAPD f695.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES - OIL WELLS II3481 BAKER PLYWOOD CO INC $371.52 BUILDING MATERIALS 113982 BANANA BLUE PRINT _ $10.995.02 BLUEPRINTING SERVICES It3493 BANK OF AMERICA-CASC f7.937.11 C.O.P. ADMINISTRATION 113494 OV PARDITI AND ASSOC f5.330.0g CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PI-30-162,PI-35-1 113485 PARR COMMERCIAL DOOq S457.06 BUILDING REPAIRS 1334S6 BARTER DIAGNOSTICS INC $971.65 LAB SUPPLIES m 113481 BENNETT-BOVEN $244.76 HARDWARE X 113488 9EN2 ENGINEERING INC 1193.28 COMPRESSOR PARTS = 113489 SgENNER-FIEDLER 0 ASSOC IN $993.00 HECHANCIAL PARTS I13490 FROWN B CALDWELL 950R9.00 LAB SERVICES tb 113,91 BROWN E CALOUCLL CONSULTING $103.111.99 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-35,P2-39,J-19 113492 TAN.IIE BROWN Ig19.23 LIABILITT CWIM 113493 BUILDERS EMPORIUM $30.90 HARDWARE/LUMBER 113494 BUILDING NEWS INC t0.10 PUBLICATION 1 113495 BURKE ENGINEERING CO 1439.50 REGULATOR PARTS �-' 113496 BURKE SCAFFOLDING f3,123.00 SCAFFOLDING RENTALS 113497 GARY G STREEO $329.62 PETTY GSH RBIKBURESMENT 313498 C M 1 9I50.91 INSTRUMENT II3499 SUMMIT SOLUTIONS, INC t5/5.30 COMPUTER HARDWARE/SOFTWARE 313500 CACTUS MAT MFG CO $1.933.97 NINE 123502 CALTROL INC $9.345.22 INSTRUMENT PARTS 313502 JOHN R CALAPRICE PHO t9.554.1R OCEAN MONITORING H.O.11-10-90 113503 CALLAUAY CHEMICAL CO /2.652.54 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-8-90 1135P4 JOHV CARDLLO ENGIVEERS S253.195.59 ENGINEERING SERVICES I-9.P1-30,PI-20,11-17 113505 CH84LES V CARTER CO 9155.50 CYLINDER REPAIRS 113506 CASE -OVER B EQUIPMENT $47.15 TRUCK PARTS 113507 MARK CASTILLO - SV3.75 TRAVEL EXPENSE 113508 CENTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYST/R N2.9A - TELEPHONE SYSTEM RODIFICATIOM 113509 CENTURY SAFETY IVST A $OFF 5616.SR SAFETY SUPPLIES 113510 CMESSELL CORP S/OR f2L9.03 INSTRUMENT PART 113511 AN CHESTERTON - LA 9935.96 OIL 113512 CHEVRON USA INC A223.09 OIL 6 GREASE FUND NO 9191 • JT nlSt WORK114S CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE m3191 PAGE 2 4E-ORT NUM%E4 4063 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 14/15/91 -ISTING DATE 1!4/11/91 WARRANT I10. VENDOR A4)UVI 3ESCgl PTI7V 113533 COAST AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION $954.91 TRUCK PARTS 113514 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT 5177.55 SAFETY SUPPLIES 113515 CONDENSER 6 CHILLER SERVICE $967.01 MECHANICAL PARTS 111S16 CINVELL GM FARTS / DIV 1190.92 TRUCK PARTS 113517 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL PIFT 616.4?3.54 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 113418 CONTAINERIZED CHEMICAL DISPO f17.2l1.1" TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL 11351P CONTINENTAL GRVFICS $361.37 OFFICE SUPPLIES 113S20 COPTROLCO f1.IS9.4P ELECTRIC PARTS 113921 COUPTV WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 1413.27 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 113522 CREDIT MARKETS T515.70 SUBSCRIPTION 323523 LARRY CUPTI TRUCK S EOUIF'M S25.141.0C GRIT REMOVAL M.0.7-I1-90 113F24 FIAT[ PUA41) OF EQUILIIATION 54R7.41 UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE FEE 213525 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 4413.PF TIRES 113526 ALGERT V DAVIES INC /143.6f4.5S CONSTRUCTION 7-13 113527 TOM DAMES 121.3- MEETING EXPENSE 11352P )EPT OF FIRM L GAME 6273.43 - PERMIT FEES 113529 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES 1419.69 PRINTING 113531 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP f379.39 SERVICE AGREEMENT 113531 CORINNE DILLON 524.543." DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL I'll 213532 DANNY L DILLON 524.563.c; DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL X 113533 DISCO PRINT COMP44Y 6425.5g WORK BENCH •=r 313534 DORADO ELATE-PRISES INC f2.311.74 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS 113535 004R-OLIVEP INC 9121.20 MECHANICAL PARTS ...� 113536 DUNN [GUARDS CORP f1.23R.65 PAINT SUPPLIES 4 113537 O-V4LS SALES $166.31 FITTINGS D 113939 EIL INSTRUMENTS INC $259.17 ELECTRIC PARTS 1 113539 EMA SERVICES INC f2.273.33 ENGINEERING SERVICES P2-44 fJ 113540 ERC ENVIRONMENTAL AND S1.512.0t LAB SERVICES 113543 EAGLE ENTERPRISES f713.3R J-TUBE PART 113542 EASTMAN ' INC 9g51.64 OFFICE SUPPLIES 113543 EBERHARD EQUIPMENT $519.51 TRUCK PARTS 113544 EVCMANIER INC 57. 311.OL OCEAN MONITORING M.0.3-14-90 I1l545 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE AgFOC 31.316.7.i LAB SERVICES 113546 JOHN 9 FALRE"TEI" 1'C IS•21J•P' CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-4 123547 FA7 PRESS 1119.26 OFFICE SUPPLIES 11354R FEDERAL EYPFEFS .CUP" $155.7. AIR FREIGHT 113549 FEP.RELLGAS 637.R5 PROPANE 113550 CHEMWEST INC Sg42.54 PLASTIC CLIPS 113551 FILTER SUPPLY CO $1,557.61 FILTERS 113552 FISCHF4 A PP-TFR CO 97.714.52 CHLORINATION PARTS 11.1"3 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO f2.54R.21 LAB SUPPLIES 113554 FLUID MAVL'L1NF. SY4 TEMF 42.142•gP PUMP PARTS 113555 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY 15.43S.4F WATER USE 113556 FOUVT/IN VALLEY PAINT 62.444.R4 PAINT SUPPLIES 113557 THE FOKKnRO CO f2.195.23 INSTRUMENTS 11395A CITY OF FULL!-TON $57.31 WATER USE F� D • 919V JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/O1191 PAGE •3( 'l FERO.II VU9pER APt3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 14/10/91 POSTING )AIE 64/10/91 WARRANT NO. VENDOR A43UNT OESCRIPTIO4 113559 GANAHL LUMPER CD 4929.22 HARDWARE/LUMBER 113563 GARPATT-CALLANAM COMPANY 545.4P CHEMICALS 113561 GENERAL TELEPHON7, CO $1.536.74 TELEPHONE SERVICES 113562 GIERLICH-PITCHELL INC $11.194.25 MECHANICAL PARTS 113503 CORDON-S INC 13.346.26 OFFICE SUPPLIES 113964 GRAPHIC DISTPIRUTORS 5249.44 FILM 113565 GREAT PACIFIC EQUIPMENT CO. 5773.14 TRUCE REPAIRS 113566 SON GREER S tSROCIATES slj.551.PII SURVEY SERVICES RES 88-72 113567 MR TYPE L GRAPHICS A1T3.95 PRINTING 113568 MATCH A KIRK INC $936.44 ELECTRIC PARTS 113569 PIKE HERRERA 1222.6E COMPUTER SOFTWARE 113570 HILTI INC $1,234.17 STEEL 113571 NOEROIGER CVS CALIF INC 41.799.s. COMPRESSOR PARTS 113572 HORIZON 0104-PEACH 9204.64 TRUCK PARTS 113573 J.T. HORVATH R ASSDC. S2.9JJ.9O CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1,J-7-4 113974 HOUSE OF BATTERIES 4110.46 BATTERIES 113575 NU64 DAVIS C34PAVY S1.477.5: ENGINE PARTS 113576 R9 HUGHES CO INC 4511.33 HARDWARE 113577 . HUNTINGTON BEACH RU9MEP STA 1279.52 RUBBER STAMPS 113578 HUNTINGTON SUPPLY '439.6 HARDWARE fTl 113579 I40 INDUSTRIES 5747.37 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES X 1139PO IMPERIAL VEST CHEMICAL SSI.L60.39 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.4-1-90 .=i 113SP1 AIROUCSI ENVIRDVMEVIAL CO. sl.369.5C MECHANICAL PARTS t0 I115A2 INDUSTRIAL PETAL SUPPLY CO. IRS5.21 METAL 113503 INDUSTRIAL THREADED P400UCTS $1,151.45 CONNECTORS 11SSP4 INGRAM PAPER $1.424.64 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES y 1135P5 J 6 W SCIENTIFIC $416.52 LAB SUPPLIES I 113586 SPEAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP $1.642.47 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES W 1135B7 JAYS CATFRINC 5415.33 DIRECTORS MEETING EXPENSES 1135PR JIM.R SUSPENSION RERVICE 1115.OP TRUCK PARTS 113989 JOHNSON POWER OF NO.A4ERICA tl1.OlD.C" SHAFT REPAIRS 113590 MALLEEN.S COMPUTFP PRODUCTS 42.110.73 OFFICE SUPPLIES 113591 KAMAN HEARINGS I SUPPLY 574.2^ FITTINGS 113592 KAREN COMPANY IRAs." TOOLS 113593 KAA PRODUCTS 1312.37 PUMP PARTS 113594 NEENAH S ASSOCIATES 53.919.75 WORKERS COMP ADMINISTRATION FEB 113595 KENKO INC SI 37.1^1.iP CONSTRUCTION 5-34-2 113596 KING BEARING INC $1.5'p.19 MACHINE SUPPLIES 111597 MARTIN KORDICK St 42.638.30 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES P1-33, 14-1-2 913994 L. S. INNOVATORS. INC. $59.61 OFFICE SUPPLIES I13594 LAD SAFETY SUPPLY CO 453.43 SAFETY SIGNS 113600 LCAGIIE OF CALIF CITIES 995.10 WORKSHOP REGISTRATION 113611 LTC 9 NO COKSULTIMG ENCR 46.124.UC ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-33 117FI4 LNSTPE-CAL M0.46 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1135n3 NBC APFLIEO ENVIRONMENTAL 11111.91 OCEAN SAMPLING 1136C4 4PS 519.94 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES FUND NO 9194 JT P1ST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4133/91 PAGE A REPORT NUMAER AP43 COUNTY SAVIIATIO4 DISTRICTS OF OR6401 C3VVTY CLAIMS PAID 34/13/91 POSTINSS )OF WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 113605 MAPDE4 SUSCO $224.51 VALVES 113606 MARINE S VALVE SUPPLY SRFI.SI VALVE/PUMP PARTS 11.3607 MAPYAC ELECTRONICS S122.3P INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 113E48 MATT - CHLOR INC S2.1P4.116 CHLORINATION PARTS 1136P9 MAYWELL COLORS $41.62 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 113610 MCKENNA ENSP 6 ERUIF $5,691.6` PUMP PARTS 115611 MCPASTER-CAPR SUPPLY CU t934.18 TOOLS I13612 4.ICPOAGE COMPUTER 52.315.61 COMPUTER HARDWARE 113613 MILLAP ELEVATE- SFPVICL S519.1^ ELEVATOR REPAIRS 113614 WILTO4 ROY COMPANY $1.215.P^ INSTRUMENT PARTS 113615 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO $4.734.44 SAFETY SUPPLIES 113616 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO S95.F9 METER 113617 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL INC $133.39 PUBLICATION 11361E PLIOEN BVNTICH CONSTRUCTION SS45.219.5A CONSTRUCTION 14-1-2 133619 JAMES N MONTGOMERY t5.131.15 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.0.6-13-90 113420 MOTOROLA INC t91.91 FREIGHT 213621 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL S67.69 PUBLICATION 113622 NATIONAL SAM17ARY SUPPLY LI^I..? JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 113623 NELARK ELECTPO4ICS 5139.56 INSTRUMENT PARTS rn 113624 NIAGARA CONSERVATION CORP. S341.39 CONSERVATION KITS 113625 OCR REPROGRAPHICS INC TJ 2.7P OFFICE SUPPLIES = 113626 O^9PIE11 ENERGY SYSTEMS 113.9TI.RP INTERIM POWER GINNER. SYST. M.0.3-0-89 113627 OCCUPATIONAL VISIO'1 SCRVICES $979.05 SAFETY GLASSES 113628 OFFICE PAVILION/INTERIOR RES 13.497.7E OFFICE FURNITURE 133629 OFFICIAL AIRLINE GUIDES t77.01 SUBSCRIPTION 113630 DC SYSTC45 'CO $6.795.97 CHLORINE H.0.2-I4-90 n 123631 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SIICFL 5761.45 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 1 113632 CPA461 VLVE L FITY14C CC. $4,162.53 PLUMBING SUPPLIES r 113E 33 OS CAPS LAO CM 6 SAFE S91.?L' OPEN LOCK 113634 OXYGEN SERVICE S610.75 SPECIALTY GASSES 113655 COUNTY OF ORANGE. t3.313.31 DATA PROCESSING FEES 113634 CSOOC SELF-FUNDED MEDICAL I 12'N.060."' PREMIUM ADVANCE 133937 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 111.CT9.7N REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSUMNCE 113638 PSOCFPOOL SUPFLY OF OC1 SA3.94 CHEMICALS 31361.9 PSSI S372.95 T.V SEWER SERVICES 113640 PACIFIC DATA COM SYSTEMS 11.73A.54 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 113641 PACIFIC MFCNAWICAL SUPPLY S277.76 TOOLS 133642 PACIFIC SAFETY E9JIPMENT CO 11.07.93 SAFETY SUPPLIES 113643 PACIFIC BELL 1719.54 TELEPHONE SERVICES 113644 PACIFIC 4A7ER CONDITIOMIN6 C ISO.4- RENTAL EQUIPMENT IL3645 PACTEL CELLULAR /71.16 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 113646 PACTEL HERICIAN SYSTEMS I5.15%.P4 TELEPHONE SYSTEM SERVICE AGREEEMNT 113647 PARTS UNLINITE9 t2R5.43 TRUCK PARTS 113648 - PHOTO t SOUND CO S269.61 OFFICE FURNITURE 113649 PIP.A FRO SYSTEMS INC 15P.391.50 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88 113656 PTTMEY RAVES 5192.A5 POSTAGE METER RENTAL F( 0 9199 - JT OIST WORKING CAPITAL PA2CESSINS DATE V1S/91 PAGE ,5 ` 9C-ORT NUMBER APRS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/12/91 POSTING DATE P411V191 WARRANT NO. VCNOOR 443U4T )ESCRI-TIDN 113651 POLY ENTERPRt9FS ANC t31V.R6 SAFETY SUPPLIES 113652 POLYMETRICS, INC. 5639.3U RENTAL EQUIPMENT 113653 POLYPURE INC 613.73R.25 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-07 113654 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE 496.00 ICE 113655 PROCESS EQUIRMERT COMPANY 3322.12 PUMP PARTS 313656 PROFET•S104AL SERVICE IND. $1.429.31 MECHANICAL PARTS 113657 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. tR.991.^.t INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O.S-0-88 133658 PUULIC TELEFHONL SISS.EI TELEPHONE PARTS 131659 PYILMEISTEP INC $7.709.37 PUMP PARTS I13660 RYPAMIO FENCE CBVPANY SAI1.7Q FENCING RENTAL 113661 RED WING SHOES S21S.22 SAFETY SHOES 113662 AA RICO ELECTRIC 12.964.32 PUMP REPAIR 113663 REGAI9 1366.60 COMPUTER SERVICES 113664 REMEDY TCNP $5.315.12 TEMPORARY SERVICES 113665 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO 11.124.15 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 135666 J R ROBERTS f1.132.50 CONSTRUCTION J-20 113667 ROTO-POOTER SERVICE R PLUNKING SIP5.01 PLUMBING SERVICES I1366A RUTAN 0 TUCKER 115R.0', LEGAL SERVICES - BEATRICE HURT-WESSON 115669 JOSEFM T RYERSON A SON IN 33S9.43 FLARE PARTS 113670 94C WEST 5412.33 LAB SUPPLIES fTl 113671 SAFETY-NLEEN CORE 4/3/.R2 PARTS CLEANER X 133672 SAFETY SUPPLY MP AMERICA 9339.64 SAFETY SUPPLIES �2. 123673 SANCON ENGINEERING INC 49.910.O11 MANHOLE COATING CO 113674 SA9TS AMR ELECTRIC MOTORS S1.S93.13 ELECTRIC MOTOR 133675 SANWA RANK 171.5R5.3C RETENTION PAYMENT 16-1-2 113676 DOUG SARVIS 5530.3E FIRST AID 6 CPR TRAINING 1I3677 SCHULER FNGINEERIVG CORP S94.999.11 CONSTRUCTION P1-27-162 113678 SCOTT SPECIALTY RASES ITT $591.49 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 11367- SEA COAST DESIGNS SSBR.119 OFFICE MACHINES 113680 CITY OF SEAL PEACH $59.5, WATER USE 1336P1 SHAMROCK SUPPLY f1.159.4i SAFETY SUPPLIES 113682 SKVPARS WALK-IN IEDICAL CLI tt03.99 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EVANS 1136P3 SL19E MASTER 1166.34 PRESENTATION AIDS 113684 SMITH-EMERY CO $2.451.69 SOIL TESTING M.O.6-10-89 113685 SMITH PIPE R SUPPLY INC SR5.33 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 113686 SOUTH COAST AIR PUALITY f139.99 P6RHIT FEES HAGS? SO COAST Alp QUALITY 463R.DP PERMIT FEES 113GP4 SOUTH COAST WATER $31.50 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 113GR9 SOUTNEAM CALIF EIISON CP 9ns.929.29 POWER 113690 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO A15.375.32 DIESEL/UNLEADED FUEL 113691 SOUVENIR FMOTI 5133.91 FILM PROCESSING 113692 SPACESAVEA SYSTf MS INC ISS1.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES 113693 WESTALLOY INC 1565.41 WELDING SUPPLIES 113694 STAR TOOL 9 SUFPLV CO f23!.S7 TOOLS 113695 STEMPEPS TREE SERVICE 11.717.9t TREE TRIMMING SERVICES 113696 MANFRED STOFFER 9312.63 TRAVEL EXPENSES FUND NO 9191 JT DIST VORMING CAPI70L PR3CCSSING DATE 4103/91 FAG! 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION 31STRI.TS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 00/10/91 POSTING DATE 04/10/91 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AIDUNT IrS.41-TION 113697 SUMMIT STEEL 12.713.42 STEEL 31369E SUPCLCO INC $30.99 TOOL 113699 US GOUT PRINTING OFFICE 531509 PUBLICATION 113700 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL INC %2.150.40 SAFETY SUPPLIES/TOOLS 11?ICI SUR-LITE COPPORATIDN 1941.92 MECHANICAL PARTS 113702 TCM ASSOCIATES 5102.21 FREIGHT 113703 TAYLOR-TUN.I MFG COMPANY 1661.94 TRUCK PARTS 113794 TECHNICAL PRODUCTS 6 CTPLS $939.47 INSTRUMENT PARTS 113719 TEMMAR COMPANY 9829.97 LAB SUPPLIES 113706 TMA/NNOCAL 980.1•G OCEAN SAMPLING 113707 THERMO ENVTL INST INC 1923.3E INSTRUMENT PARTS I137GP THOMA$ MIRE MAPS 1117.66 MAPS 113709 TONY-$ LOCK 6 SAFE SERVICE $72.42 LOCK 113730 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE INC 52.690.R7 LANE CLOSURE SERVICES DIST 2 113711 TRAVEL TRAVEL 13MR." TRAVEL SERVICES 113712 TRUCK A AUTO SUPPLY INC 1747.74 TRUCK PARTS 113713 TRUCKVARE 5552.10 TRUCK PARTS 113714 US AUTO GLASS CENTERS 1121.33 TRUCK PARTS 133719 UNDERGROUND $HOPING SPLCIALIS7 $2.815.36 TOOLS 113716 UNOCAL 5199.31 UNLEADED GASOLINE rn X 113717 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 1229.22 PARCEL SERVICES = 113718 US DEPT OF C04MEPCE WTI 933.00 PUBLICATION ..y 113719 VOC TESTING 11.265.00 AIR SAMPLING SERVICES C10 I1372U VWB SCIENTIFIC 94.212.93 LAB SUPPLIES 113721 VALIN CORFORATION $432.01 MECHANICAL PARTS 113722 VALLFT CITIES SUPPLY CO 19.375.21 MECHANICAL PARTS D 113723 VALLEY DETROIT DIESEL S3.555.07 MECHANICAL PARTS 1 113724 VERTEX SYSTEMS 15?1.30 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT C77 113725 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY S?1E.S5 SAFETY SUPPLIES 113726 VILLAGE NURSERIES $52.1. LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 213727 CARL WARREN M CD $253.11 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 113728 WARREN GRPMAM 9 LAMONT INC $217.51 SUBSCRIPTION 113729 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL 5159.00 PUBLICATION 113730 WEATHER C MIND IVSTRUMENTS F295.50 SAFETY SUPPLIES 113731 WESTERN CORPORATE. IMAGES 91.557.76 OFFICE FURNITURE 11373P VESTEPN STATE CNFMICAL SURF 931.335.9R CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-8-90 113733 WESTAUX INTERNATIONAL $97.46 TRUCK PARTS 11-734 VMIRLMIRD TRESS 9100.9E PRINTING 113735 VILLDAI ASSOCIATES s960.03 ENGINEERING SERVICES 113736 ROURKE L WOODRUFF 1I7.519.54 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.30-30-90 123737 VENTURI SOFTWARE INC. 9?92.19 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 11374A XEROX CORD 93.329.4-! COPIER LEASES 113139 YORK INTERNATIONAL 1162.00 COMPUTER TECH SUPPORT 313740 2IEBARTH 0 ALPER/C30PEP 11.349.439.75 CONSTRUCTION P1-30-1 ----------------- TOTAL CL.1MS PAID +4/1P/91 S4.I3P.125.49 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 04/03/91 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/10/91 POSTING DATE 04/10/91 SUMMARY AMOUNT S1 OPER FUND 5264.44 SI CONSTR FUND $1,648.65 R2 OPER FUND $1,501.79 - 42 CAP FAC FORD $7,458.26 92 CONSTR FUND $2,956.89 43 OPER FUND $23,756.33 R3 CAP FAC FUND $6,934.38 S3 CONSTR FOND $3,203.87 45 OPER FUND $712.87 45 CAP FAC FUND $134,077.37 66 OPER FUND $182.25 47 OPER FUND $3,747.08 f71 S7 CAP FAC FUND $141,914.93 X 411 OPER FUND $842.09 2 811 CAP FAC FUND 537,065.49 013 OPER FUND $46.26 Co 414 OPER FUND $1,126.10 S14 CAP FAC FUND $724,013.75 4566 OPER FUND $4,117.94 y 5667 OPER FUND $6,333.80 i 47614 OPEN FUND $21.86 V JT OPEN FUND $621,985.97 CORP $2,008.268.42 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $222,305.90 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $183,639.90 ______________ $4,138.126.49 FLING NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/I9/91 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER APRS COUNTY SAVI l AT 104 01 SIR I CIS OF ORANGE C3UVTY CLAIMS PAID )4/24/91 POSTIVS DATE C4/74/91 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIRIIDN 11375A AGM CORPORATION 1528.80 GAUGE 113759 AN NEST COMPANY 13R.25 PUBLICATION 113760 LIH^.OLN CARPETS L INTERIORS $257.12 BUILDING MATERIALS 113761 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS INC $1.545.273.06 CONSTRUCTION PI-39-3.PI-35-2,J-21 113162 AIR COLD SUPPLY INC 3193.27 HARDWARE 115763 AIR FRUPUCTS S CHEMICAL 1N 916.174.00 OSK AGREEMENT-OXY, GEN. SYST. M.O.8-9-69 I13764 ALADVIN HOUSE 13.775.61 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 113765 ALLIEO ELECTRONICS 1151.BU INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 113766 ALTA SALES INC $521.65 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 113767 BOSCO INC S/OR AMERICAN SEALS 59.539.7M HARDWARE 113768 BLAME P ANDERSON 1211.69 CELLULAR TELEPHONE EXPENSES 113769 CHARLES E. ANDERSOV 11.555.16 HARDWARE 113771 ANTHONY'S MECM L MACHINE. INC. $335.75 PUMP PARTS 113771 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $4.952.02 NOTICES 6 ADS 113772 ARAIEX SERVICES INC 171957.94 UNIFORM RENTALS 113773 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT 11.4S2.25 INSTRUMENT PARTS M 113774 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGIVIEPING 12.355.90 SOIL TESTING X 1137T5 ASSOC. ADMINIS. 1 :ONSULTANTS 11)5.00 MEDICAL CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR = 113776 AMSA $365.30 TRAINING REGISTRATION 113777 RALPH W - ATKINSON 11.277.9T PUMP PARTS 113778 BC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC $332.84 TRUCK PARTS 113779 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE S1U5.376.62 GRIT REMOVAL M.0.7-13-88 tz 115TOD BANANA RLUF PRINT $1,749.27 BLUEPRINTING M.0.30-10-90 1 IIJ1B1 1 ACLATS LAW PUBLISHERS 1432.00 PUBLICATION F. 113782 PW BAROTTI AND AS SOC 15.000.30 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PI-30-2i3,P1-35-2 113783 B BATEMAN $595.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 113784 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS INC 13,215.69 LAB SUPPLIES 113785 ROBERT REIN WILLIAM FROST 125.56S.71 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-33 i 5-30 113796 SOILA RADIATOR SERVICE 959.00 TRUCK REPAIR 1137RT SON-A-RUES 1121.90 TRUCK PARTS 113780 HOOT BARN 194.69 SAFETY SHOES 113789 BOYLE ENGIP.EIRING CORP 1151.255.91 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-30,10-1,6-12,7-7-1 113740 PRINDERS011 CORP 51.515.D04.00 CONSTRUCTION J-19-2 113793 BROOMS INSTRUMENT DIV $559.12 INSTRUMENT PART 113792 BROWN L CALDWELL 22,710.10 LAB SERVICES 113793 BROWN 6 CALDWELL CONSULTING 937,156.63 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-29 113794 RUILRER•S EMPDRIUM 199N.42 HARDWARE 113795 BUILDING NEWS INC $551.82 PUBLICATION 123796 THE PUREAU OF NATIONAL AFF 1945.20 PUBLICATION 113791 THE. hURMC COMPANY 195R.00 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 113799 BURME ENGINCERING CO 1125.55 REGULATOR PARTS 113799 RUSH AND ASSOCIATES AFC 110010.00 SURVEYING SERVICES RES 88-71 113860 GARY G PTNEEO $52.30 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT I13801 IS COMPANY 1531.51 VALVES I13802 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC.. S4.313.56 LAB SUPPLIES 113903 CALTNDL INC 11IU.O0 MECHANICAL PARTS fU 9199�• JI GIST VORµiNR CAPITAL P40CESSINO 041C 4/Ig/91 PASC 2 REPORT RUMBEi AP43 CnULTY SANITATION OISIRICTS OF ORANGE COJNTY CL414S P413 34/21/91 P3STI4G DATE 14/24/91 WARRANT NO. VENDOR 44)UIT )ES'alaTl]4 113AP4 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC O7.iF $264.14 (LATE REPAIRS 1136PS CALLAWAY CHEMICAL CD 132,337.69 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-8-90 II1AP6 CA4LETD4 ENOINEERS $5.511.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.0.5-9-90 117PC1 CART aURf.O 57.632.79 SECURITY SYSTEM PARTS 113PUP CF.471'RY SAFETY TNST A SUrF 1879.63 SAFETY SUPPLIES 115949 CHEYFOH USA 14C 16.174.68 OIL & GREASE 213PIC COLE-PARMLR INSTRUMENT CO f147.93 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 113RI1 COI.ICH AND SONS 165,214.03 CONSTRUCTION 7-11-1&3 113PI2 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA 13.943.25 PUMP PARTS 113813 COMPURFRVC $261.52 COMPUTER SERVICES I13P14 C0.1DfN9ER 9 CMILLCN SERVICC $1,130.33 AIR CONDITIONER REPAIRS I13P15 CONNLLL GM PARTS / DIV 19R.A2 TRUCK PARTS 113P16 04301.10ATE0 ELECTRICAL GIST $4,199.29 ELECTRIC PARTS 113917 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO 15.355.65 CHLORINE 113019 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICP 912.625.53 PRINTING IIMP19 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 C $947.46 SOIL SAMPLING 113P2.1 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY f393.13 TRUCK PARTS ll?P21 CO04TY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 1697.5E ELECTRIC PARTS 11302R CHEMICAL PROCESS44S INC $1.556.77 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 113N23 L&RTY CURTI TRUCK I I.OUIPM 122.600.G1 SLUDGE REMOVAL H.O.7-11-90 X 113P24 CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMC 160.60 PUBLICATION = 113P28 EMPLOYMENT OEVELOFMFNT DEFT 16.505.09 STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE o--. 113826 STATE OF CALIFORVIA $227.99 DIESEL USE TAX CXI 113927 04C TVC 11.222.65 ENGINE PARTS 113P24 DAILY PILnT 116.9' NOTICES & ADS 11SM29 DATArRO ' RESEARCH CORD S1♦?4 q.3A PUBLICATION EO 113830 DE A47A C0POPATION f150.40 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 1 113031 DEAVER MAMIIFACTUPIMO CO. f1.1S9.74 TRUCK PARTS N 113832 DEZUR14 AND/OR CS CO $675.42 VALVE PARTS ISSg33 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES 22.3S4.14 PRINTING 1131,34. DISCO 'PINT COMFAVV ISSR.S. WORK BENCH 113A35 DORADA CMTLRFP2SFS IIIC 12.645.30 PLANT MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS 113AS6 ROVER ELCVATOM COMPANY 995.31 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE ASPS? OUN4 EDWARDS CAPF 1351.92 PAINT SUPPLIES 113034 D•VALS SALEP - 11.214.24 FITTINGS - Ill89P EStTM49 INC 64.632.23 OFFICE SUPPLIES 113P44 CNGINECRS SALF.S•gLRVICI CA 13R.34 PUMP PARTS 11)P41 ENVIRONMENTAL LAO S45.3C SUBSCRIPTION IINP42 EVYIRUIMfNTAL RESOURCE ARgOC f77.in LAB SERVICES IISP4. FMM COPIFP PROPUCT3 $151.31 PAINT SUPPLIES 113644 PST SANG AND GP4VFL 14C 5249.J3 ROAD BASE MATERIALS 213045 091 INS1411HENTS R CONTROL 11.347.IA INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES Il!P4A DAnHALL FAIPOC9 9173.VP DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 113047 J309 FALKENg1EIN IT: N.27 fP01 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-4 IIFP49 f'OC µAL F.PRFgt CMgP 111q.T3 AIR FREIGHT 315949 e•a,rLLOIS 511.14 PROPANE FUND NO 91^9 . Jt 911T YJPNINC CAPITOL P90CESSINS DATE 4114Y91 PA-s- RE13RT 4UN8EA 4043 CPUNTY SANITATION )ISTRICTS OF ORANS[ COUNTY CLAIMS FRIG .44/74/91 POSTING )ATE 04/14/91 WARRANT NO. VFNLOR AMOUNT DESCII-TIDN II3P50 FILTFP SUPPLY CO $157.16 CHLORINATION PARTS 113931 FISCHEI R POPT[P CO 111001.44 CHLORINATION PARTS II3P5R FLAT A WASHING SYSTEMS CONCRI TC IXq2.NQ CONCRETE CUTTING 113053 PLEfT STEMINF SYSTL Y.S INC 16.954.64 JANITORIAL SUPPLIBS 113PSs FLU-SYSTEMS MV f16.335.52 PULP PARTS 113pq5 FOUNTAIN VAULTY CAMEPA VALLEY f3S5.31 FILM 113935 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLLY 65 .1P HATER USE 113P97 FOY EVTF PPP iSE3 f1. 3641.4C SAFETY CONSULTANT 113850 FOANURO CO / HAG SYSTEMS f2.993.9R I T II3P99 U1NE14 COMPUTER CORP. 693.09 PUBLICATION 113P50 ARSCNE FPFY {T1.16 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION IIPA2 CITY OF FULLF.OTDV 171.44 WATER USE 11SP61 GEORGE TFLCPMONC CO f1.239.41 ELECTRIC SERVICES ES IIIA63 6CORSC LEECH L ASSOCIATES {11256.75 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 113065 SIEPLICN.M INCH CLU INC f1Y.045.13 MECHANICAL PARTS 113966 SRAOHIJC3 INC l2.915.43 OFFICE SUPPLI83 113R66 GRAPIC CONTROLS f455,50 INST0.1138NT SDPPLIR$ 1139AT GRAPHICO 09 EIS T RIB UT003 µ.931.25 FILM 113p6n DON G4 F.[N L A9N0CIe T[S f16.931.tS DEFERRED SERVICES IRESBU 38-72 T1l 113A 69 FRLU A MHARPERIND f1.358.R9 DEFERRED COUP DISTRIBUTION X ]13N711 NLPp HAWN INDUSTRIAL YU STI 31.118.03 LAB SUPPLIES/VALOR = 113R71 PU PAWN CO INC S4.I17.13 MECHANICAL ..-r 113P72 D04AL FF.0 COS CALIF INC f1.107.53 MECHANICAL PARTS b�0 I13074 DOVALp O NONO4IC9L {SJR.II CONSTRUCTION IONP SERVICES J-23 113P74 J.T. HOOF B L ER50C. t2.9J9.0J CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1.J-]-1 133076 HOUSE OF BATTERIES .224.21 ENGINEERING W 11]876 SOPD UN V MOYT IS.LP9.tt ENGINEERING 98RVIC68 M.O.9-12-90 I13877 PS NU6 LES CO INC f1.930.57 PAINT CONSTRUCTION W 113879 IVNT[P COPPORATtON 5531.113.7ft CONSTRUCTION J-19-1 113P79 CITY OF MVNTINSTOh PEACH fISA S6 WATER USE IINPPO 1041 IHUTTO VgL[r SCNY7NN C {1.$46.95 TRAVEL 113RP1 /0Y1 hUTTO f15.45 - TRAVEL 6 MEETING EXPENSE 113RP1 IMFFPTAL VEST CNIPILA 6 , 1 . FERRIC CHLORIDE L.0.4-1-90 11393 AJPFOLST ENYTPDNPLVTAE CO. 11.343.36 ENGINE PARTS 1139P4 INDUST41AL TNP[RDEO oROPUCTS s143.44 HARDWARE 113PA6 INOANINLE-PANG ERUII Op1P 14O.4P TRUCK PARTS 1I3PP6 INLAND [-PIPE EVUII ME NT CO. t130.31 ITRUCKNSTRUMENT PARTS 113AP7 IVVEPNATI SNAL SC NSOP IICF 1427.17 ILECTRIC T SUPPLIES 1134M IVVENT[R SYSTEMS TrlEPDISTRICT fb$21.33 ELECTRIC PARTY 113493 14YI4C RANCH N4TI4 OISiPiCI 111.32 WATER USE ICH 113A93 JL9 CP C)JT CFPP {113.51 MICROFICHE READER LEASE 113A92 SfAAT VESTCPN SANIIAPY SUFP {114.1A JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 113N91 JANUS IMP, $431.21 LAB SUPPLI83 113094 JAY-4 CA TERIN4 .112.32 DIRECTORS L86TING EXPENSES 113894 IrVN9TD NI SINCLY fl•110.3P ELECTRIC PARTS 113945 NCV•S OIL INC t711.73 WASTE OIL REMOVAL FU� 93'I^^- JT NISI LORE ING CAPITAL REPCF531MG DOTE 9/14/91 NGP 4 REPORT /lV MRIi O943 Cf'U4TY SA N110T IOU DISTRICTS ORAEE C]UNiT CLAIMS R4I0 14/24/9I 03STt4S ]RTC GV N/91 WARRANT No. VFNDOP ARIUNT DESCRIPTION 112896 41MIEPLE 6ROS INC t277.53 CYLINDER REPAIR 113097 RING dC00.1N0 INC 13.1/2.to MACHINE SUPPLIES 113890 MARTIN KOPOICM SR $2.543.21 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 14-1-2,I-9 113894 LAOOPATORV EPECIOLIRIS. INC. t215.L4 LAS SERVICES 113900 LAP RAFCIY SUPPLY CO S14.2P 111901 LAP SUPPORT 14,142.54 TEMPOSAFETY SIGN 113902 LEE A RO CONSULTING CRAP 57.637.^3 ENGINEERING SERVICES ENGINEERING 98RVIC68 R89 90-301 1139n1 CPC T•aE44 INC. 1117.95 PUBLICATION 113904 RP LINOSTROM INC S22.130.G7 CONSULTING SERVICES - ENVIRONMENTAL 1134115 L!ICIL OOVEPNMENT CONNTSSION 1143.19 REGISTRATION 113906 LOPATM PRODUCTS S1.257.24 SERVICE AGREEMENT 1139ni 401 RIOLOGIC COMPANY S231.0.1 SERVICE AGREEMENT 113R"R MPS 1237.57 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 3139C9 /ACIIMNALM.9TCPHFNS S129.4'1 SITE EVALUATION - REFUSE SITE 11391K MACONCO F137.2A MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 113911 NAVLFY•S BOILER REPAIR CO. 114C SIP.517.33 BOILER REPAIRS 113912 MtAVAC CLECTROVICS 5129.74 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 113913 MATT - CHLOP INC 56.711.79 CHLORINATION PARTS 113914 MCMENNR ENGR S EOCIP 45.956.4^ PUMP PARTS 113919 MCHASICP•CAMR SUPPLY CO $764.15 ELECTRIC PARTS X 113916 PFCHANICAL DRIVE SYSTEMS S55.P5 INSTRUMENT PARTS 113P17 CP04F'TDN MLTERNASTER INC 5936.35 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES fi 113411 41CROAGE COMPUTEP 1I19.156.12 COMPUTER SOFTWARE/HAROAARE M.0.2-13-91 CA I13M19 KELLAR ELEVATOR SERVICE 5472.66 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 113920 SCRPFNTIY AND/ SI.494.23 MECHNAICAL PARTS 113n21 JAMES M M047GOMCRY $6.575.16 ENGINEERING SERVICES Cp 113922 N34TG.OYERY LABORAInRIES t4.I53.75 LAB SERVICES I 113423 YnRGAN CRANE CO INC S4.193.59 CRANE REPAIRS r 133924 44TIONtL ACADEMY PRCSR $27.95 PUBLICATION 313925 NATIONAL FIFE PROTECTION Al f194.44 PUBLICATION 113926 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICR IA f, S2.33n.1, VACUUM TRUCK SERVICE 113927 NATIONAL SANITAPY SUPPLY 521J.34 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 113920 OUST 4 NEVBLRG C3.IRi CO 11.711.191,06 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PI-33 113924 NIAGARA CONSERVATION CORP. 9111.94 HARDWARE 11393P NORC4L CONTROLS INC fiS i.65 COMPRESSOR PARTS 113"1 NORTM SUFFLY L12R.U5 COMMUNICATION SUPPLIES 115932 NOVELL AMP 11.063.n.1 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 113933 OCCUPATIONAL VISIO4 SFP9ICLS S456.5i SAFETY GLASSES 115934 OR SYSTEMS CO 151.599.14 CHLORINE M.O.2-14-90 1134Y5 ORANGE COAST E1.GCTPIC SUPIt SIll.25 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 113R36 CNANGE COUNTY AU" PRAYS C 1226.90 TRUCK PARTS 113437 09440E VALVE 1 FITTING. P.O. 11.19907 VALVES 11.9.K OSCAR•$ LOCK L SAFf $55.65 KEYS 113939 ORYGYW SEPVICI 11.217.5o SPECIALTY GASSES 113140 PSSI 11.456.5: T.V. SEWER LINES DIST 2 6 7 t13441 o4rifiC DATA CON SYSTLNS $11.31 FREIGHT FUND NO 9/99 JT DIST VORNING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/13/gl PAGE 3 IECOMT NUNBEA A-43 COUNTY SANITATIOY DISTRICTS 3F ORANGE C3USTY CLA14S P419 14/24/91 POSEIN3 781E 44/24/91 WARRANT N0. VFNOOR 443UNT DEscgl,TION 11?942 PACIFIC FARTS f5.7a9.31 INSTRUMENT PARTS 113943 PACIFIC SAFETY FOUIPMENT CO 1311.7. SAFETY SUPPLIES 113544 PACIFI: PELL 912.27 TELEPHONE IONSSERVICES SYSTEM 11394E PACrNE MERIDIAN SVSTEPC f97.37t.R1 COMMUNICATIONS SYSTfiM X.O.10-10-90 113947 PA6r MMI fS3.45 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 11394J n6v. NEST f1i?.43 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 113948 FALNIEP.1. TYLFF, VIENEM. IS.S11.51 SERVICES - OIL WELLS 113949 P4P.9SO4 t5306 SEALS 1139% cAPTS UNLIMITED 41.4W 3.41 TRUCK PARTS 113951 PATTED COPP/ TAYLOR TOSTM t773.24 TRUCK PARTS 113952 ROY FCYOrRGRAFT S451.Pa DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION Ili", PLAIkS TRUEVALUE NAPOWAPE t19.23 HARDWARE 134954 POLIVAC CORVGgATIOV t25S.1a LAB SUPPLIES 113-55 POLYNETPICS. 14C. ft)t.93 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 113956 POLYPURE INC 115.152.39 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.11-3-87 113957 FOWEP ELrCTRO SUPFLY TO fIS1.9P ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 11355b POWER SYSTEMS 1331.11. ENGINE PARTS 11395- 4APOLD PRIMROSE ICE fi S.3M ICE 113960 THE r9OJECT SOLUTIONS CO. 1A.915.i. INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O.8-8-88 113961 )U.L11Y REFRIGERATION f635.95 GAUGE fTl 1139R2 RAINPOV DISPOSAL CO t].pq.?s TRASH REMOVAL X 113963 RAIYPOW RUT t BOLT IVC. 1594.48 CONNECTORS 2 t" 113964 RE SY4tCM8 INC .7 9.t9 HARDWARE Ctf 133965 IMF. R UTEPP9LI f1.139.65 TEMPORARY SERVICES 113966 THE 9EPU9LIC SUPPLY CO t5.325.71 PLUHBING SUPPLIES 113067 J p tN` PTS t369S711.17 INSTRUMENT J-IT I 11396R POIANIUu PP ODUC TS CO t291.3R INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES t 11397; PEE6Y 9UPV t325.5G EDEFERREDLECTRIC COMP DISTRIBUTION 113971 SAP WIFE INC t1.711.33 ELECTRIC PARTS 133972 SAFETY•NLErN COOT f1.g94.9i PARTS CLEANER 333973 SAFETY SBVFLY nF s3T91[l f95C.6` SAFETY SUPPLIES 11397J DUOG SHOOTS . 1e..1A FIRST EAIDNGINEERING 6 CPR TRAINING 111975 THESCI SCNO OLEO CO 27. 1)P.1] OCEAN SERVRING M85 113975 SCIIMCE AVPLITATIOYS INTO t127$733.17 OCEAN MONITORING-M.0.6-1J-90 I13976 5CA C04$t INCf•NS f751.A- OFFICE FURNITURE SERVICES 11397T SFa OCR C 12.4 6.6S CONSULTING SERVIC88 - OCEAN MONITORING 11397E Shl-POCK SUPPLY f215.2S HARDWARE 111979 SISMILIICR SALTS t31i.75 TOOLS 113991 SIGNS CHEMICAL ES - S21.73 CHEMICALS 1139111 SLIDE MASTER f132.99 PRESENTATION AIDS 1139P2 SOFT W60FNOWSE/WP3 TE 9U P.LGIp .55 COMPUTER S NB I139P3 SOUNCNSCO ARTY A ROTLNTN f1.27q.12 LEGAL SERVICE - PERSONNEL 113OP4 SOO7V COAST 34S OUf IT f$59.`1 TRUCK FEES 1139A5 f4PERS SO U CJAST 3006E f33.21 TRUER PARTS II49Rc SOUL CALIFCALIFfEDS C91 SON CO R25.3SS.a4 POWER II?9RT S9 f.. I C7150N :O 9112.1t9.9P POWER FACILITIES RELOCATION M.0.1-9-91 F U4, 9119 �^ JT $)III WORMING CAPITAL II oyOCESSIN'u SATE 9/19/97 e-3- 5 RF-ORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION 7TSTIICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID O4/P4/91 -DSTIVG DATE 44/24/91 WARRANT N0. VENDOR AN3UN1 OESCIT-TION 1339SR SR CAL GAS CO S21.355.92 NATURAL GAS 113989 SOUTNERM COUNTIES OIL CO 16.832.45 DIESEL 6 PROCESSING FUEL 113990 SOUVEI(ET PHOTO 37.39 WPHOTOATER PROCESSING 113992 SPSRALCTTS DRINMTNG VATC(. SI.$44.53 WATER/COOLER RENTAL 113992 VESTALTOO INC 551.53 WELDING SUPPLIES 1I3494 STAR TOOL R SUPPLY CO t1.551.9A ART 133915 STEQLTNG ART SI53.S3 ART SUPPLIES 113995 SUVSCT FORD 5771.63 TRUCK PARTS 113995 SJPELCO INC i929.17 LAB SUPPLISS 113997 SVPFR CNEN CORP $798.75 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 113999 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL 14C $3.IIJ.97 TOOLS 213599 T C INDUSTRIAL COVTROLS. t9).59 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 1I90PA TIPS INTER PRINT. INC. F119,19 PRINTING 114OOI T4LIf1 TIRE INC SL952.59 TIRES 114L'92 TAYL9R-OUHN MFG COMPANY $159.96 TRUCK PARTS 114C13 T1104SON TECHNOLO6V. INC. 5147.57 TRUCK PARTS 1340b9 IDLED(' SCALE CORP. 1P9.252.93 TRUCK SCALE 114015 TRRVFL TRAVEL {2r239.19 TRAVEL SERVICES 114Gf•6 TRUCK L AUTO SUP-Ly INC $735.45 TRUCK PARTS m 119607 JG TUCKCR R SON INC t1.150.94 FILTERS X I14900 US PENTALS $247.53 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 2 114089 TMF UVISOURCE CORP $514.92 PAPER 134019 UNIT(0 PUS CORP. SS31.45 VAN RENTAL tz 114911 UNJIL0 PARCEL SFIVICY S231.50 PARCEL SERVICES -1 114912 V.F. F(ITERPRISES 11.699.1f TRUCK REPAIRS DU 114.13 AWN SCIENTIFIC 17.553.?f LAB SUPPLIES 1 114014 VALIM CONPORATION S151.9P REGULATOR IIe0 15 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO 912.319.72 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 11,016 VyIERMSN SVooLT ..7.09 LAB SUPPLIES 119J17 VEST COAST TERMINALS INC 52.539.7. OFFICE SUPPLIES 114-JIA WESTCPN STATE Cl,LMICAL SUPP 39.955.94 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-8-90 114519 VELTkNF INTERNATIONAL $44.65 TRUCK PARTS 114020 NILLUAV ASSOCIATES 512.539.7R ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-9-R1 114021 ROURKE A WOODRUFF 562.939.30 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.10-10-90 3141.22 YFROY FOPF t5.150.6P COPIER LEASES 114N23 GEORGE YARDLEY COMF ANY SARI.97 VALVE PARTS 1141,24 7I(EAPIM END ALTER f9i;r9?A.75 CONSTRUCTION P2-42-1,P1-34-1 119525 RICNAFD N FDIAR 12,1.9R DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION ................. TOTAL CLAIMS FATD '.9/24/91 190MJ03J.72 FUND NO 9299 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 04/18/91 PAGE 7 REPORT WONDER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAINB PAID 04/24/91 POSTING DATE 04/24/91 SUMMARY AMOUNT WI OPEN FUND $248.63 41 CAP FAC FUND $2,064.98 82 OVER FUND - $17,635.30 42 CAP FAC FUND $25,318.71 43 OPEN FUND $20,954.43 R3 CAP FAC FUND $989.21 45 OPER FUND $7,752.37 45 CAP FAC FUND $25,566.71 86 OPER FUND - f185.80 46 CAP FAC FUND $14,401.17 47 OPER FUND $2,612.44 47 CAP PAC FUND $137,904.48 411 OPEN FUND $13,327.14 R13 OPER FUND $9.13 414 OPER FOND $6,406.73 414 CAP FAC FUND $31,173.22 rn 4566 OPEN FUND $036.03 X 4566 CAP FAC FOND $4,129.98 = 4667 OPEN FUND f602.84 JT OPER FUND $643,603.17 to COST $7,142,059.60 -4 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $14,533.50 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $177,775.07 w -------------- V f8_980,090.72- ' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Ef ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA • P.0.BOX 6127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 82728.0129 V 'ORAL FLUB AVENUE FOUNfA1N VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92MB-MIO Q141 MO-2910 CIA)8BR2411 RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS JUNE 12, 1991 - 7:30 P.M. F� 0 9199 JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL \ 40CESSING DATE 5/57/91 PAGE I( ` RE-OAT NUN9Ei AP.S COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NP GRANGE CO➢R IY _ 1 CLAIMS PAID 05/08/91 POSTING DATE 05/06/91 1 >: YAARAYT M0, TEN00R A98 T 114052 A A A DEBURRING 8 TUMBLING $476.96 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 114114A CA WATER AWARENESS CAMPAIGN5.➢0 NAgSR CONSERVATION MATERIALS_.__.___ 114054 NAB SYSTEMS $170.65 INSTRUMENT PARTS 114055 AT S T S10T4.59 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE 98RVICSS 114057 AIR PRODUCTS 6 CHEMICAL IN $16.174.00 OAK AGREEMENT-OXY. GEN. BYST. II.0.8-9-09 124058 AIRBORNE SYSTEMS. INC. S5.0DO.00 AERIAL MAP - RANCHO DEL RIO COMPOST SITE 9 S 09..LO_____TRUCg_9C71L6 REPAIR.... ____ 114060 AL NIETO COMPANY S65.10 REFUND USER PER OVERPAYMBNT 114061 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT tN.1R ASPHALT D 114092 ALPNABA2 saa21E.60____ _INSTRUMENT SUPPLI68 _ _._ .__ 114063 AMERICAN CABLING A CORN 1197.41 COMMUNICATION SUPPLIES rn 114064 AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY S289.00 SUBSCRIPTION = 1.51 PUMP PARTS _ n 114066 IKETEMA f996.99 MECHANICAL PARTS -'-" 114067 CITY OF ANAHEIM f8.609.74 CONSTRUCTION 2-26 i.y 114G6R ANAHEIM EXTRUSION DD INC ty;a}2- RBPUND_USER P8B OVERPAYMENT___ 1 114069 ANAHEIM HOTEL S90.66 REFUND USES F86 OVEAPAIlIBNT 3 114070 ANAHEIM SAW SHOP INC $106.75 TOOL REPAIR f14o71 ANCIENT MARINER RESTAURANT a111.no REFUND USER FEE OVSRPAYMBHT 114072 ANIKTER - DISTRIBUTION f415.96 CABLE " O 114071 ANO D'ART 9114.96 REFUND USER FBI OVERPAYMENT f 1AAT1 A-PLUS STATERS s9.SA 2.NT NOTICES 6 ADS 075 AOVATIC BIOSYSTEMS• IMC f140.15 LAB 9UPPLISS00 " 111144 016 CRATER SERVICES INC $3.951.20 UNIFORM RENTALS 1 ft1077 ASSOC. AOMINIS, A CDNAULTANIS 148.00 MEDICAL CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR I11078 AVONSARD PRODUCTS USA. LTD $151.00 MONITORING BQUIPME TT ---' 114079 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 1159.066.02 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.7-I3-80 r1140ah AACKFLOU PRrVENTIG4 Dryler 1192,an BACKFLOH TESTING__ 114081 BAKER PLYWOOD CO INC $1.592.41 BUILDING SUPPLIER C PUBLICATION 111082 BANE ROBBITTIT AND CO fIS4.00 4 II/G83 PV ERR BABBITT AND ASSOC $1.213.60 CONSTRUCTION S8_R_VICB_S_P1-39-280rJ-11 114095 BEATER DIAGNOSTICS CS INC f1$432.60 D USERS-" 111085 BEACH-L IN PLAZA 1429.78 TRAVEL USER FEN OVERPAYMENT 11608E JAHES NYON A02A.18 TRAVEL 6 NESTING SKP8N8B t"f REFUND-IrRi<PE0.a11B0.PA7MEN4''____" 1IIiB7 BIG CANYON COUNTRY CLUB f1.047.30 CCn 11/009 BLUE DIAMOND MATERIALS f790.82 CONCRETE 111089 THE BOND BUYER f1L in TECHNICAL PUBLICATION i 111090 BOOT BARN /99.99 -BAFEW4MHSEB- 114091 BROOKHUNST SHOPPING CENTER 9S16.90 REFUND USER FEB OVERPAYMENT 11109P BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV $792.59 INSTRUMENT PART 111093 BROWN f CALOVELL $3,950.00 -- j 114094 STEVE BUBALD CONSTRUCTION CO SI.787.421.06 CONSTRUCTION 2-26-1.2-2B.2-29 I1909B BUit DER•S EMPORi S199.91 HARDWARE/LUMBER 11909E BUILDING NEWS INCUM $519.98 �01ZY YbFT- 114097 BURKE ENGINEERING CO $50.29 REGULATOR PARTS a z FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PR3CES31NG DATE 5/02/91 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER 043 7> aUN}V N CLAIMS PAID 05/00/91 POSTING DATE 05108191 V AP0.ANT NO. YEMOORAMOUNT OESC31SLON..__ ..__.. ,�._,_..... II4099 9USN AND ASSOCIATES INC $2.509.00 SURVEY SERVICES RES 08-71 +I.oeg naa• x .een t1N !+ PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT,______.,__ 1I4100 BUTLER PAPER COMPANY $0.85 OFFICE lummuN 114101 CEN CORPORATION $5.143.19 LAB SUPPLIES _ — lufn. SUBMIT SOLUTIONS. SERVICE AGREEMENT 114103 CS COMPANY i61421.05 LAB SUNG SUPPLIES 111/01 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. It11-1. LAB SUPPLIES 8 I+1f Oa [ e 1 OCEAN MECHANICAL PARTS _ 114186 JOHN R CALAPRICE PRO f12r733.62 OCEAN MONITORING M.O. I-17'-90 111107 CALLAWAY CHEMICAL CO t2.5f7.43 ANIONIC POLYMER M.0.0-0-90 n 3, MECKANICAL PARTS C7 111109 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $290.579.96 ENGINEERING SERVICBE P1-3f i3-$b.PI-36 Z 114110 CHEVRON USA INC 23,510.50 GREASE 6 OIL C TRAVEL, MEETING 6 TRAINING EXPENSE D 111112 CIMCO t/97.00 REFUND USER FE OVERPAYMENT 111113 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT 936.00 PIRG EQUIPMENT SERVICE �--I 1f Nf• roFeT INenpAN[E AGEHEY S127.ann.on EARTM UAKE INSURANCE M.O. 9-I_3_-91 _ _ �I—__— ___.—._____.. f71 114115 COASTAL COMMUNITIES 9999.85 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT g 114116 COMMERCIAL CENTER DEVELOP. $2.195.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT G NIS OF CA PUMP PARTS 11/118 CONNELL ON PARTS' / DIV 979.55 TRUCK PARTS 114119 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST 93.559.4T ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 11 PUBLICATIONS 00 1I4121 CONTROLCO r $1.249.53 ELECTRIC PARTS 1 1111P2 COOPER INDUSTRIES INC i370.12 FITTINGS y EQUIPMENT RENTAL D 114124 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $491.94 ELECTRIC SUPPLIER' r 11112E LARRY CURTI TRUCK L EOUIPM $23,940.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.7-11-90 F— flat,. CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF [ONMF 299,1111 PUBLICATION 11412? DAMES i MOORE $150,526.59 CON9ULTPT NRG eEN7—EARTHQUARE-PAEPARBDNE d 111128 ALBERT U DAVIES INC $292,153.41 CONSTRUCTION 7-13 1 BUILDING REPAIRS 114130 DEL PAR WINDOW COVERINGS $1.207.0 U-USEA�'EB�OERPA4UEPT -- '� 114131 DCLEC $15.90 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT n 1�4.2A VALVE PARTS 1 I14133 DIFILIPPD ASSOCIATES F471.20 PRINTING N I 124234 DISCO PRINT COMPANY f101.91 OFFICE SUPPLIES 114135 JYC ENV IP nNNCNIIL f..19M_75 TOOL REPAIR 114136 DOCTORS HOSPITAL OF SANTA ANA 21.400.1 R PE UN-6 U9Ek i'EE OUERPA411EMT`---- 114137 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC $9.495.00 PLANT HAINTENENCE S REPAIR Italia OUNKEL BROS MACH MOVING 13.I4I.04 SPACE RENTAL J--19A 1139 DUNN CDWARDS CORP f11 . ITIUPPL38_ 214110 D•YALS SALES l212.40 FITTINGS 11A11f ER[ ENVIRONMENTAL AND '"'fla-ftfi LAB BERVICEB _ ' 111112 EASTNAN INC fl d2l.62 62 OF ICE EUPPLYEE-'--""'-'- 111It3 ENCHANTER INC $7,200.09 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.3-1/-90 a f0 10 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL ( PROCESSING DATE 5/02/91 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP03 D COUNTY SANII rou ntc Tx vrc n n UNlT � CLAIMS PAID OS/09/9l POSTING DATE O5/O8/91 W ' YARPANT NA. vFNOnR An.xHT a 31_P11DN— __.., 114190 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC 11t2N.110 LAB SERVICES tfafaR F.Te Tt nF URGE-LAM REFUND USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT 1141,06 JOHN 9 FALKENSTEIN PE $3,201.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-4 114107 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 1125.00 AIR FREIGHT PROPANE 119199 FILTER SUPPLY CO f233.13 MRWMICNL PARTS -- --- 110150 FISCHER 9 PORTER CO $14.005.91 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 1.0 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMBNT 110153 FLUIDTS TENS f19$29.36 PUMP PARTS 119153 FLUID HANDLING SYSTEMS f29.I6 PUMP PARTS m I10156 FOANKLO CO / HAS SYSTEMS $1.339.19 INSTRUMENT PARTS - fTl 11015E FRANELIN COMPUTER CORP. 1930.11 PUBLICATION Z 3a 1_.p PAINT SUPPLI69 CSAFE__ _______.___._._. y I10159 GMF SOUND INC 3 0. SAFETY SUPPLIES 110159 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO f2.21S.02 TELEPHONE SERVICES PBA PSB OVERPAYMENT 110161 GIERLICH-MITCHELL INC $2.039.62 PUMP PAT m 114162 GLENHAVEN MOBILODGE $174.24 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 3 8 REFUND USER FEZ OVERPAYMENT Z 114164 GORDON•S INC 22.150.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES C3 114165 GRAND CENTER /00.02 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT COMET aann.3M IN THUMB" SUPPLIES__._ 00 114167 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS 12.000.80 POLAROID CAMERAS/FILM DON � 6REEN S ASSOCIATES t179197.50SURVEY 1 319168 RB FUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT D 114170 HALTOM RECOGNITION INC f197.62 RECOGNITION AWARDS r 114171 HATCH 9 KIRK INC $9.193.06 ENGINE PARTS LAWAY CONTAINERS a.ane.+n _TRASH_RBMOVAL 114173 S A HEALY CO $6.561.57 SEWER REPAIRS DIST 2- ------ - d 110170 HODGSON ELECTRIC $1.100.00 RADIO TONER INSTALLATION TRUCK PARTS 114176 J.T. HORVATH 9 ASSOC. 92,900.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1-.J-'!-L__ ti 119177 MOUSE OF BATTERIES f00.51 EATTBRIES 1111TA R. xtr xFe rn THE � I 110179 RODNEY HUNT CO 99.99E 73 EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT - - CA IU180 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STA $30.27 OFFICE SUPPLI69 .aR HARDWARE 110102 IDM CORP $130.57 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 110183 IMPERIAL VEST CHEMICAL $33.155.91 PSRRIC CHLORIDE M.O. 11-14-90 119t94 INGRAM PAPFR sl•a7 a.Pn SANITORIAL SUPPLIES __.____._ 119I85 INSIDE WASTE CIO CAP REPOR 9275.00 PUBLICATION ! 114186 INT-L UNION OF OPERATING E $2.530.00 SETTLEMENT. CASE 56665E 1141BI SAS, 15 PUBLICATION 114288 J 9 V SCIENTIFIC $09.92 LAB SUPPLIES -- -- -- --- 119189 JML MANUFACTURING R2 $96.47 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT D W FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL .PROCESSING DATE 5/02/91 RAG! t R REPORT BURNET AP13 n NAIMS PN1AI CLA D 15/09/91 POSTINS DATE 35/0019/ � - r .....I xn_ WEND.. ••0UY7 ^ESCXIPTION_ 114190 UILLIA9 N JACKSON 15.60 MEETING EXPENSE ES194u a .... .... Hn 14 TAMZT4RIAL_9VPPLYBS____ 114192 JAYS CATERING $311.42 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSE 114193 JT LEE INVESTMENT $163.51 REFUND ONE FOR OVERPAYMENT 19N9• JOMN3TOME--S IIO^LT 93q.6. 848CfRIC PARTS - _ 114195 TOE KEITH COMPANIES $219.57 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-35 6.5-36 114196 BELLY SPRINGFIELD TIRE COMP 52f9.92 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT I t.Io7 vEeYEOr pnpRr elan.r E• S363 60 COURT RBPOR'TER aARV._ _M6UTRON_P_W_T_IN0 114198 KENSINGTON GARDEN$ MOBILENOHE 12.234.61 REFUND USER FBI OVERPAYMENT 114299 KERR GLASS $6,937.14 REFUND USER PER OVRRPATHENT D nun. rtve Te ur W aa..IWr y,.,2y, _._GBARS _-___ CD I14201 NINE SEARING INC $1.112.55 MACHINE SUPPLIES Z 114202 BOML•S HALLMARK CENTER 11.312.99 OFFICE SUPPLIES C MDICv a7.._u CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 11-1_21I-9 D 114204 KRAFT FOOD $5.792.58 REFUND USER PEE OVERPA7M�Ml'- 11A205 LA LAMPARX ROBILMORE PARK $1,913.47 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT Iti Iu2pc • M.ITE CNE111C•L 9^DLCT9 .L53.p4 CIIBMICALS . . _. -4 114207 LAD SUPPORT 12.975.13 TEMPORARY SERVICES rn 3 114208 LAN-PLATE TECH $68.30 REFUND USER FEE OVERPATMBNT FT .... ........ REFUND USER F8E_OVBRPAYMBNT ME 114210 LIDO MARINA VILLAGE 111.011.98 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT C3 114211 WILLIAM J LLOYD f6G.41 MEETING 6 TRAINING EXPENSE 11,91.2. InTim ^Ell[.i LOSS .c3-2. COMP ER 89FTWAR _ _8 00 114213 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES f1r220.00 PURCMA36 AGREEMENT 114214 LUCK.T 7 MOTEL $250.06 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT I11.11. PNDTOGW_1PNIC SERVICES_____._ _ 114216 RACOMCO $197.20 BERUT" AGREEMENT r 114217 NAGNETEC. INC $225.90 TRRNBFORMER REPAIR I"" n Atta x•xr ra ....... JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 1142 MART AC ELECTRONICS 11 . ELECTRIC SUPPLIES O 111t20 20 RATi - CHLOR INC f11 6.26 t6 PUMP PARTS N INST0.UM_BNT PARTS -1 314222 NESS TECHNOLOST $93.50 REFUND USER PEE-OVEPPAYMBNP A 116223 CROMPTON METERRASTER INC $212.35 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES .f Afs• nrn rxr eg•sn'_na ,_ REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT__ -I 114225 MICROAGE COMPUTER 12.211P.32 COMPUTER SOFTWARE%NIRDHARB Cn 314226 FICROAGE COMPUTER STORES 91,305.36 COMPUTER SOFTWARE/HARDWARE 114227 m,L IRnyr •EO/n. un[M. uen.y LAWS SUPPLIED 114228 SERPENTIX AND/ 't3.T 70.00 MECDANIGL PUTTS 110229 MISSION LINEN SUPPLY $4.302.10 REFUND USER FEE OVERPATIINT n.93M M AOEJLBUE110L.-COTSISUCUAN •I.L31J35.I! _—sounRUCTION R-1-2 114232 MONTGOM ERY LABORATORIES $1.659.74 LASOFF SERVICES 11A232 MONTROT SUPPLY CO f152AO-51 OFFICE SUPPLIES 114P33 Meroe OlA r w •M SnVILrc /Pyp.3• CELLULAR USER E [EB TELEPHONE SERVICRS D i 114234 NABISCO NN.297.77 -� o66RPAYAERI _ 114235 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES INC 52.151.08 VACUUM TRUCK SXRVIC68 D q ID 9199 - JT DIST VORRING CAP17AL PROCESSING DATE 5/02/93 P66E REPORT NUMILI 045 COUNTY SANITATION OISIR ILT3 OF OApNGC CD'JNIY r CLA14S PAID 09/09/91 POSTING DATE 03100191 tr WARRANTNO, VENDOR AMDUNT ESCAIPTION 114236 NATIONAL VISUAL SISTERS 14.173.3D SIGNS BEACH114237 CITY OF NEWPORT WATER USE 114238 O-BRIEN ENERGY SYSTEMS 13t.502.T8 IRTERIR POWER USHER SYST NCR 114239 OR SYSTEMS CO $29.954.71 CHLORINE M.0.2-14-90 114240 ORANGE COASTC ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 114241 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY C $632.92 --cROUNDORESPINU-SUPPLIE9 - "--"'---'-- 114242 ORANGE VALVE S FITTING CO. 9623.55 FITTINGS 114243 OXYGENSERVICE 1110.41 SPECIALTY GASES 114244 COUNTY OF ORANGE 92.603.00 DATA-PROCE99IHG-SERVIC89- 114245 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $5,444.64 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE n 8.90 COMPUTER SOFTWARE . 114247 PSSI $230.15 CRERICAL9— - - - T 114248 PACIFIC PUBLISHERS $55.99 PUBLICATION Z114249 PACIFIC SAFETY11.TB SAFETY SUPPLIES W 114250 PACIFIC BELL 1694.47 --'TSLEPRONS"9E1TVICE9 - - '-'-_-'-'-' 114251 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING C $69.40 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CELLULAR S.U.By CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES T114253 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $2.756.39 TELEPHONE 9Y9TBR MODIFICATIONS"'--" 3 114254 PAR WEST $1.317.41 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES LEGAL SERVICES - OIL WELL CONDEMNATION Z 114256 PRESSOR 2132.64 -SAFETY--BUPPLIBS " C3 114257 PEAT MARWICK MAIN 6 CD 16T8.00 AUDITING SERVICES .BAD,71 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT OO 114259 PIMA ORO SYSTEMS INC $1211033.90 R69IDUALS-RERMAr H:0:5=11=8E----- I14260 POLYPURE INC 116.092.70 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-87 I 114261 PORTRAIT WORLD INC f1.dt 6.63 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT n 124262 POSTMASTER I174.11 -R8FUIW-USER FEE-OVERPAYMENT-"'- r 11,4263 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO A70.59 ELECTRIC PART r ICE 11t265 PRINCESS MOTEL 3125.9E --REFUND-USER FEB OVERPAYMENT 114266 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. 94.816.09 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O. B-B-BB 114267 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS 9599.31 ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR —V 1126 REININ INSTRUMENT CO.. INC 1. .18 ZA£9UPPLIES.__.._...._.. .. ..____.. A 114469 RCC 1C INC 641.641.18 41.6t 641 1.IB BLUDOB REMOVAL M.0.7-11-90 "° 114470 REMEDY TEMP 91,.ST l.l3 TEMPORARY SBRVICEB t1 II4271 REMOTE METER RESETTING STET !3.008.00 PUBTAUE"'-- N 114272 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO 11.916.42 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 114273 REMOLD INC. SIT it MECHANICAL PARTS 114274 ROBINMOOD MOTCL /276.06 RETTIND-U3E EE-OVERPAYMENT"' -' 114275 ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL $600.00 OXYGEN ANALYZER TRAINING 114276 S 9 C OIL CORP 310T.01 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 114277 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP A66.49 PARTS-CLEAHER-"""- -- "' - ""--""- IN27B SANTA ANA ELECTPIC MOTORS 9156.04 ELECTRIC MOTOR PART 1142T9 SANWA BANK 9133.276.30 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION PMNT 14-1-2 114280 SCIENTIFIC SPRAY FINISHERS 3165.,4 REPORT)-MRFEE OVERPRINTS"--- 114281 SEA COAST DESIGNS 1369.56 OFFICE MACHINE FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5102/91 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 k CLAIMS PAID 05/09/91 POSTING GATE 05/OBI91 WARRANT MR. ESCR1PI101L__ 114282 SEAL BLACK {19P.51 ASPHALT SECURITY SYSTEM PARTS I19204 7/11 HOTEL B BY PARK t923.65 BFVND USER FEE oVBAPAVARflT----_.._ 11.265 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $740.24 SAFETY SUPPLIES TOOLS 11/287 SLIDE MASTER - S1S3.17 PRESENTATION AIDS 114288 SMITH-EMERY CO $3.908.00 BOIL TESTING M.O.6-14-09 41.1. SOFT COMPUTER HARDWARE/SOFTWARE 114290 SONNENSCHEIR NATM B ROSENTH $3.599.25 LEGAL SERVICES - PER80-7tR EL - 119291 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY SSI0.30 PERMIT FEES n REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT G7 I14293 SO CALIF COASTAL WATER f1.209.00 OCEAN MONITORING Z 114294 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO $155.612.77 POWER SOUTHERN COANTIrq nil CA DI89EL FUEL C7 114296 SOUVENIR PHOTO $32.64 FILM PROC E3IN3 n 114297 STAMEN I SPASSOFF PE $2.540.00 ]ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-30-1,J-25 J..l3i-t. ___WELDING SUPPLIES T 119219 SPECTRUM-HUMAN RESOURCE SYS $31.640.99 CONPUTBR SOFTRAIl6 R:o:1z=lz�a STANTON COTM LA 3 119300 $T EDNA CONVALESCEVT CENTER $269.06 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT UNORY see.c. REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT Z II4302 STAR TOOL t SUPPLY CO S290.L9 TOOLS O 114303 STERLING ART $92.76 ART SUPPLIES TRAVEL, MEETING 6 TRAINING EXPENSE 00 114309 SUMMIT STEEL 11115.79 STEEL 1 119306 SUPER CHEM CORP ti52.59 PAINT TOOLS SUPPLIES D I1930I SYNERGY CIRCUITS INC t9I.B9 REFUND UReR�-3VERPAVRRRT - F' 119309 1A0 G IN. YAG60N No BILHOME PA is 31.35 REFUND USER PER OVERPAYMENT f- - TRUCK PARTS 139321 TELEDYNE ANALYTICAL $343.40 INSTRUMENT PARTS - - O 11.312 THEE MC0 SYSTEMS INC $2.216.69 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT CA OCEAN MONITORING__ --I 119314 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 91,211.34 I -PARTS 114315 GEORGE M. THURO f100.00 REGISTRATION �'" n.su .ne twn olrn ncx L3yg.0 LAB SUPPLIES -�-1 131317 TOWNE ADVERTISERS $4,959.90 -�1 RIFTIA� y 114318 JANE TRAN $9.90 MEETING EXPENSE it.i1. r ....EtnwRE tiFFANy iwN S.9 REFUND USER FES OVERPAYMENT 114320 TRAVEL TRAVEL 93,965.50 AVITE".O.15=13=90- 119321 TS TRIPP 1635.00 CARPET CLEANING 1 t.il, i.wC. a AUto euoou ixr in t2.Rq _ _ _TRUCK PARTS 114323 JG TUCKER B SON INC $10,799.10 INSPRURERT- PRAT$_ 114324 TWINING LABORATORIES OF {9.657.50 SOIL TESTING 114325 US POSE II_ SERVICE i9 c..J�REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 114326 UNION FOODS $2,291.57 Rg��R-FEE�ERPAYRERT 119327 UNOCAL S152.96 UNLEADED GASOLINE m 00 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/0l/91 PAGE 1` ' \\\ REPORT NUMBER AP43 D xaT-9LN�a•a•nu pl cao rriiOLORAyGE�lU4 LY _ _ V CLAIMS PAID S5/00/91 POSTING DATE 05/08/91 114328 UNION OIL CO/DBA UNOCAL 1923.22 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT • SAFETY SUPPLIES 114330 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE H42.06 PARCEL SERVICES 114331 V.F. ENTERPRISES $2.959.90 TRUCE REPAIRS .p eaeP unr arua.... •14gpn-nD REGISTRATION 114333 VWR SCIENTIFIC 13.009.49 LAB SUPPLIES - -------- 114334 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO $1.945.91 PLUMBING SUPPLIES S.Is _ REFUND USER_FB8 OVERPAYMENT 11433E VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $4.207.53 LAB SUPPLIES 114337 VARNER READINESS PRODUCTS $159.95 EMERGENCY WATER DVrANr-S PI 11MBIxr. a PLUMBING SUPPLIES. 1+512.DO .._. _ m 114340 VERTEX IKING SYSTEMS U.312.50 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT Z 1I4390 VIXING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 1131.91 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES d 4.4c REFUND USER FEE FEE OVERPAYMENT _. D 114342 CARL WARREN 0 CO $765.18 INOUPARCE CLAIMS AONINISTRATUR 114343 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL $179.35 PUBLICATION '--' qTArr ul,rg prtn"rre agyZ9 _HATER SAVINGS PACKAGE TT '114345 WEAVER 6 NOLA SS5.30 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT _' -- -- 3 114346 WEAVER 0 MOLA t200.35 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT g�9p REFUND USER_FEE OVERPAYMENT 114349 YESTATES CARBON INC 14.391.90 CHEMICALS 114349 WEST COAST ANALYTICAL SAP 1235.00 LAB SERVICES YA,_PRnnup.. .x aB7l !L SIGNS ....__.—__._... OO 114351 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY ft9.91S.64 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.B-E-SO 1 114312 YM IR LPOUL CORP f171.35 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT PUBLICATION D 114354 WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES INC 154.27 REFUND USER FEE OVBR6AYMEPT r— 114355 WILLOAN ASSOCIATES $4.522.90 BNGINERRINO SERVICES 2-9-R1 r 1141%, trROv CARP u2.32.q•nn COPIER LEASES pj 214358 YELLOW FREIGHT COMPANY 992.91 PNMF PARTS 11439E YELLOW FREI OHT SYSTEMS t111.11 FREIGHT —4 114360 RIx RDD[R nrer PROD e1 iR.$71.52 __REFUND USER PER OVERPAYMENT S 119J60 RICH ARO YOUNG PROD f-1.62 ELECTR72--SEA@PLIES ----------------- N TOTAL CLAIMS Pe10 05/OR/9I ---f5.3 99=567-70- D 1 31 FM NO 9199 - JT DIRT WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/02/91 PAGE 8 00 ER-APt9 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/00/91 POSTING DATE 05/08/91 41 OPER PUND $195.34 .,N- _._.._.._... ._-. __ 42 CAP FAC FUND $1,013,289.30 43 OPEN FUND t22,519.12 . 6 45 OPER FOND $694.32 D 45 CAP PAC FUND $870.90 G1 y9 ----'---"- '-- -- -- m 47 OPEN FOND $9,060.19 Z 47 CAP FAC FUND $295,241.03 D 225.80- ---__ All CAP FAC FOND $29,923.56 813 OPER FOND $35.99 3T;438:25- 3 4566 OPER FOND $2,756.59 4667 OPER FOND $2,352.13 Z JT OPEN FUND $1,224,105.02 CORE $510,411.79 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FORD $215_947 91_ r N o--i -4 I/1 00 FUN( 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5116191 P42E 1 `- • ` REPORT NUMBER AP43 t" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PRIG 95/22/91 POSTING DATE 05/22/91 F� WARRANT A40UNT 114379 ASA ANALYSIS f571.00 PUMP VIBRATION TESTING 114380 RP ADAMS COMPANY $296.18 114381 AOYANCO CONSTRUCTORS INC SI,231.917.90 CONSTRUCTION PI-34-2 114382 AIR PRODUCTS A CHEMICAL IN f15.114.OD DAN AGREEMENT-OKY. GEN. SYET. N.O.8-9-89 83 ALTA SALES INC $326.25 __INSTRUNENi.P.ARZ.____ _ 114384 AMERICAN CABLING 6 COMM f713.70 CABLE/TOOL 114305 AMERICAN FLEET PARTS 199.20 TRUCK PARTS 314306 AMERICAN MEDIA INC $121.00 I14307 ROBCO INC 6/OR AMERICAN SEALS f9.S31.68 GASEETS/SEALS - 114308 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION f22.007.98 SEWER REPAIRS DIST 2 A 7 n 9 BLAKE P AN D S7 0 �A D8Y8RRED COMP WITBDRAWAL m 214390 ANTHONYAS MECH 6 MACHINE. INC. f579.80 MACHINE REPAIRS m 114391 A-PLUS SYSTEMS 12.317.21 NOTICES A ADS Z114392 ANATEN SERVICES INC s/ 1 .73 UNIFORM RENTALS _ E7 114393 NIC40LRS ANHONTES 994.90 MEETING, TRAVEL A TRAINING =PBN8R n 114394 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT 51.362.25 INSTRUMENT PART 114395 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE P 23-91.62 BUILD_ING_NATRRI8LS f17 114396 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING s1.534.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.4-11-90 3 I14397 ASSOC. ADMINIS. 6 CDNSULTANTS ft7l.OJ MEDICAL CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 1 a 62 ___ TRUCK_PART9 _ m 114399 AUTO SHOP EGUIPPERT CO 1125.62 TRUCK PARTS 114480 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $106.703.44 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.7-13-88 9.1,00 ENGINEERING SERVICES - OIL N61LS _ 00 i 114482 SAMARA BLUE PRINT $3,911.00 BLUEPRINTING H.O.10-10-90 1 114403 BANK OF AMERICA f1.533.30 BANK CARD CHARGES 114404 PU BAROTTIASSOC95,202.2D CONSTRUCTION SERVICES P1-34-263. PI-35-2 114405 B BATEMAN f595.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION r i 114406 ANTHONY BANTER f27.76 MEETING A TRAINING EXPENSE T- 114407 BAXTERS ,010.76 _LAB SDPPLIBS tv 114408 WT DILLARD INC f139.45 TRUCK PARTS 114409 BLACK 901 CORP 9115.44 ELECTRIC PART Co + 114410 90LSA RADIATOR SERVICE SIS6.87 RADIATOR REPAIR _ 114411 BOOT BARN 1212.4R SAFETY SHOES 124412 BOYER ENGINEERING $505.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES - DETOUR PLAN 111411 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP f/ .00 ENGINEERING 96AVIC89 J_17 111419 BR FN NER�F IEOLER 6 AS52C IN - $202.61 MECHANICAL PARTS 114415 PRINDERSON CORP $1.156.491.06 CONSTRUCTION J-19-2 114416 BROWN 6 CALDWELL $251.00 __._LAB SERVICES 114417 BROWN 6 CALDWELL CONSULTING $52.524.29 ENGINEERING SERVICES RE8119-43- 114410 CAROLYN A BRUSKIN %144.15 MEETING EXPENSE 114429 C. J. BRUYN - 2255.00 LAB SUPPLIES 116420 BUILDER-S EMPORIUM f31.D3 HARDNAR6�UMBER 114421 BUILDING NEWS INC $120.50 PUBLICATION 114422 BURKE ENGINEERING CO $1,927.12 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 114423 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES INC f9.735.00 SNRV6Y 9ERVICE3 REB�B�� 114424 GARY G STREET) S2.956.69 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT GU H FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5115191 P43E 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 to 2 � CLAIMS PAID OS/22/91 POSTING pert 05/22/92/91 N —WARRANT 114425 SUTLER PAPER COMPANY $Bd32.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES .-44MNUN7.CATxQRS_BQPPLIRB 114427 CS COMPANY $1,755.27 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 114428 CT MEETING PLANNERS. INC. SS91.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION tt AAsg PA. YRn1 INn +1.159.28 _3N8TRUMBMT_SUPPLI BO 114430 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION INC $1.256.04 TRUCK PARTS 114431 CALLAWAY CHEMICAL CO $2.414.76 ANIONIC POLYMER H.0.8-8-90 ItA421 CAR • ]1.]1_____.... .._.__. _CAt1ERA_REPAIR___ 114433 CARLETON ENGINEERS $L390.00 ENGINEEAIN6 SERVICES 8-9-90 114434 CENTURY SAFETY INST 8 BURP $700.33 SAFETY SUPPLIES TRU_CB„ PABTE_____.__, a) 114436 CHROME CRANKSHAFT INC 1640.00 MACHINE REPAIRS 7T1 114437 CORINNE CLAWSON f169.78 MEETING 8 TRAINING EXPENSE C 114439 C.I.C.S. CO. INC. 5I156 73 - -- --_PUMPS PARTS—�---- -- - D 114440 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA 3370.00 COMPRESSOR PARTS ma 114442 CONPDMFSVF $223.Y9__—...—...__. PHOTOTSRRIRVAC01!_____._.-- 11 NO2 CON NED•S PHOTOGRAPHY $254.90 TRUCK PARVIC68 g 1IH 43 CONN ELL 6N DARTS / OIV $331.90 TRUCK PARTS S I9.A _P�ECTRIC SUP�LIBS _- 2 114445 CONTRACTORS BOOK STORE 9229.65 TECHNICAL PUBLICATION 114446 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 C $6.056.40 BOIL SAMPLING 1A,Alt_u TRUCR_PARTB 00 11144E COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 3997.2E ELECTRIC PARTS i14499 JAMES IOWAN f71.30 MILEAGE EXPENSE 00 _ENGINEERING SERVICED DIST 5 n 114991 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 150.00 ANNEXATION FEE 7-234 1— 119952 3T A TE OF CAL IF OENIA :456.69 HAZARDOUS WASTE FEES r nn45 llir13—___._____—__ HAZARDOUS WASTE TAX____ 114454 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE $52/.31 TRUCE-PANTS d 114455 DE ARTA CORPORATION 1156.30 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CA 4]3 TRUCK-PARTS 114457 DISCO PRINT COMPANY $215.26 OFFICE SUPPLIES a 11445E DORADO ENTERPRISES INC. $30,290.23 PLANT MAINTENANCE It RePAIRB 114919 OORR-m lVrR INC 114460 OUNV EDWARDS CDRP f3.957.29 PAINT SUPPLIED CA 114461 O-VALS SALES $1.319.43 FITTINGS u 4462 rt"tn PRACFBR FOUIP Cn AS+.111.]1______HARDWARE 114463 EMA SERVICES INC $865.49 ENGINEERINGG SERVR1gt'Wf3=T(-73T�— i 114464 EASTMAN INC 1I.835.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES 114465 1042.13 _____ "THINK EARTH" PROGRAM__ 114466 ENGINEERING NEWS RECORD $97.00 PUBLICATION 114467 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC 372.70 LAB SERVICES llqqfiB 6 INSTRUMENT PART 114469 MARSHALL FAIRIES 2173.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 114470 JOHN B FALKENSTEIN PE 13.200.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-4 b0 N FUr� 9199 - JT GIST VORKING CAPITAL C PiOCESSIN3 DATE O51I3r91 P46! S , S O 4 OF GRAxrf_EDUNli I CLAIMS PAID 05/22/91 POSTING DATE 05/22/91 -- W a JI66Rlx• Mx. VFunnR AMeuxT ______,DE3211 PELDN__.____.._ _,_, 111171 FARR SALES 6 SERVICE $8,208.75 FILTERS 111173 FERRELLOAS $57.93 PROPANeIG_NT 116111 FISCHER 6 PORTER CO f698.22 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES I3.9a32____ __ .LAB_SUPCLI6II—___.___._ 1111T6 FLAT A VERTICAL CONCRETE 2164.00 CONCRETE CUTTING 1111T7 FLO-SYSTEMS $1.692.96 PUMP PART __— .PUNLCARR9___.—. 114179 FORCE MPG CO.. INC $69.75 OFFICE SUPPLIES 116/90 FORD TRUCK SALVAGE $19..68 TRUCK PARTS n 11440 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAIFIA 168PAIN_.______ 111103 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT f168.27 PAINT SUPPLIES T 11.... FOR ENTERPRISES fI.919.00 SAFETY CONSULTANT 2C7 IIA11A THE PevR ele In ta.191.99 a _ _ I T 9UPPLI8 _ 1H8 FREESEN RV SUPPLY f111.19 TRUCK PARTS 1IA106 _ AR6ENC FRET f/l.li DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION WALVB_PARTe_—____ m LUH 111189 CITY OF FULL CR TON 136.00 BR 3 GANAHL LUMBER CO 3398•91 LUHB9R/H/IU AROWAR6 A..... USE 999.00 _.INSTRSON90HVATIQN PAOMOT]ON IMTBRIAL3 Z 111192 BE COMPUTER SERVICE 19t.00 INSTRUMENT O ...... GENERAL TELEPHONE CO f9r 791.69 TELEPHONE Ira, L$52.5�__.—____—NESTINICAL PARTS _ OO TAOS TYRONE C. GIYAN f92.56 OFFICE 6 SUPPLIES EXPENSE 111190 GORDON-3 INC f1r 791•!6 OFFICE SUPPLI88 1 BUAVBYINO 88RVIC68 RE8 88-72 _ 1t4197 N9 TYPE 6 GRAPHICS 1162.3R PRINTING r 114498 N.F. SCIENTIFIC 9150.69 INSTRUMENT BUPPLI68 I— .uuR MACH COMPANY sla R.a5 CHRMIG18tzp _ 114500 FRED A HARPER $1,460.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 114501 HATCH 6 KIRK INC 32.967.92 MECHANICAL PARTS a$56.00 CONTAINER TRAINING _ 1 I 114503 VAV10 HEIN2 159.00 INSTRUMENT N TRAINING EXPENSE ...... HIP STANDARD 1199.11 INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION �••� 2.R.a1 _____TRUCK PARTS_ _ � 114506 NOCRBt6 ER CVS CALIF INC f091.63 MBCMANICAL PARTS Cc/0 I 114907 HONEYWELL INC $467.73 CHARTS a.SD — .,AREA n... O D .....vH sRI _DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 114509 J.T. HORVATH 6 ASSOC. $2.500.00 CONSTRUCTION 88RVIC68 J-23-1, J-7-1 114910 HOUSE OF BATTERIES $141.00 BATTERIES' .IAR.A 1.ORDDSL—u HnVT sL39LB8_..___.______ BBOINBBRINO SER_V_ICED H.O.9-12=90 _ 110512 AS HUGHES CO INC 63.362.19 PAINT SUPPLI88 114513 HUNTER CORPORATION fI63.159.10 CONSTRUCTION J-19-1 u Aau •.TY nF uONn ur.muJI EACH .Ie.L90.A0.--__—___.WATER T/BE I14515 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STA 1194.66 OFFICE SUPPLIBS 114516 IMPERIAL VEST CHEMICAL $57.360.39 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.6-21-90 a UO W a FUND NO 9194 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/I5/91 PAGE R REPORT NUM9CR 4P63 to NIl— tl_444N"1SLi1GI3�E�RANOC.-COYNiY___. CLAIMS PAID 05/2219l POSTING DATE O8/22/91 114517 AIROUEST ENVIRONMENTAL CO. 13r717.75 OFFICE MACHINE i 16SL0 IN....... YP nnYC1S 1Sa6.0A ___.. ._CONNECTORS_______ 114319 INGRAM PAPER $555.21 OFFICE SUPPLIES 114520 INT.L DIVING SERVICES 19r779.71 OUTFALL INSPECTION BBRVICSS 114922 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT {1d22ATERUUSNT__.____. 114523 TRVI NE RANCH WATER OISiA/CT 127.4E MICRR U88 116505 JLA CREDIT CORP f165.30 TOOL. RIPAI READER LEADS 114525 IACA A WESTERN 209.10 _._--TOOL_RRIAIR___. 114506 GREAT CATERIN SANITARY SUPP $906.99 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 116506 JAYS CATERING fl06.99 INSTRUMENT- SUPPING EXPENSE `Li0Y.J0--- ---------2NSTRUMART_BUPPLI89. m 114529 JOHNS SUSPENSION SERVICE S59.00 TRUCK PARTS TT1 w... JOHN.T0 NE SUPPLY f276.l6 ELECTRIC PARTS Z .!0 TOOLS_ _ 11650E KAR PRODUCTS 3698.6E SARONARB 114532 AA SAFETY PRODUCTS f65.9Y eAFeTY SHOPS n-� 00.00-----------NASTE..OIL_RSMOVAL . T 114534 KING SEARING INC 92.735.25 MACHINE SUPPLIES $ 114535 MARTIN KORDICK SR 63,064.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 14-1-2, I-9 .70. _INBTRUHUNT-PARTB ME 114537 L 9 C TIRE SERVICE f201.29 TRUCK PARTS O 114930 LAS SUPPORT $4.099.38 TEMPORARY SERVICES 00 114540 LAN-AIR $66.40 ELECTRIC PARTS 114941 KINANH. T. LE f78.5G MILEAGE 1 Se..00 _ BdGIdRRBENG_8R6Y3CR9 P1-33 _ 114543 LINITOROUE CORP 1216.65 MECHANICAL REPAIRS r 114544 KP L140STROR INC $4.732.45 CONSULTING SERVICES - BIIVIRORNENTAL f— 411.25—_._...__. SUPP____ C 114547 AJ LYNCH CO 92.165.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 8 a. 114517 HDS NUCLEAR INC flr155.00 SBRVICB AGREEMENT Cn OILER REPATIQN—NlId$H.Q � 116550 MARTEY•S BOILER REPAIR CO. INC $604.19 BOILER REPAIRS IIr450 MARTEN f216.21 OROUNDBRBBPING BVPPLI86 DUS I 114552 MARSHALL INDUSTRIAL TECH $649..800L VIDEO REEN_TA-_L C INC fIIr!l9.53 CHLORINATION B_V_PPLIEB155 ., : .18_--.—.-- _ RBYIS65_ —_ i 116555 MCMENNA t COVIP $1.295297.66 PUMP PUMP PARTS 116446 NCMA6 T[II....CARN SUPPLY CO 1497.I8 McCNRNICAL SUPPLIES 114559 MILLAR6E COMPUTER 919061.76 SERVICES GREEMENT 114559 HILL AR ELEVATOR SERVICE H10.66 SERVICE AGREEMENT 6.112.49__.._.—.__.__. INPT_RUMENT 11956E NINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO . 6.6 INSTRUMENT PARTS 114562 J6M[S N MOMTGO60M CRY $5 13r595l eNO2NBBRINO 86RVIC89 S CU r R PIP 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL ( PROCESSING DATE 5/l5/91 PAGE i REVORT NUMBER AP43 WCOUNTY_SA.LLTAIION DISTRICT& OF ORANGE CtQVTT --__ 1 CLAIMS -AID 15/22191 POSTING (ATE 15122191 WARRANT MR. VENDOR gOUNT _ _Brml-IL(N_ _ 114563 NORTON SALT AND/OR $454.01 SALT CONIRHTIGTION9 PARTS 134965 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES INC fl•125.00 VACUUM TRUCK BERVICCES -- 114566 GUST K NEWBERG CONST CO $1.059,659.34 CONSTRUCTION P1-33 114541 NEWPORT STATTQREPt (65.96 __ ____OYFICB_SUPPLIES _ 114560 RJ NOBLE COMPANY $6.800.60 EMERGENCY SEVER REPAIR DIST 5 114569 NORCAL CONTROLS IVC t650.52 COMPRESSOR PARTS 114572 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SEPVICFS tt _ _______ SAFETY GLASSES 214571 OFFICE PAVILION/INTERIOR RES t90.839.BB OFFICE. FURNITURE 114372 DR SYSTEMS CO $34.667.21 CHLORINE M.0.2-14-90 j__ MEETING i TRAINING_88PBN38_ _ ITT 114575 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPL 23?9.37 ELECTRIC PARTS m 214475 ORANGE COUNTY AU TD INGT! C t234.S1 TRUCK PARTS Z 25 VALVES t=p114577 OXYGEN SERVICE $1.458.47 SPSCIALT9 CASES 11457E CSOOC SELF-FUNDED MEDICAL I f100.900.00 PREMIUM ADVANCE 214579 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT6�330i(� __ REIO®UR98 WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FUND ITT114580 COUNTY OF ORANGE - EMA 2229.60 PERMITS 3 114591 PSSI f5.195.44 TV SEWER SERVICES ,4A40 AERIAL PHOTOS Z 114583 PACIFIC PARTS $257.75 OFFICE SUPPLIES 114564 PACO PUMPS f355.B9 PUMP PARTS 0 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 00 114586 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS tlll.93 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 114587 PAGENET $33.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL I T 45R6 PASTA UNLIMITEDf.EIIy51 TRUCK PARTS n 116589 PEAT MARWICK MAIN 0 CO f10.000.00 AUDITING SERVIC .T—Tf f- 114598 ROT PENDERGRAFT $450.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION f- _ 1. 229.04 _ ELECTRIC PARTS 114592 PIMA -6R0 SYSTEMS TE MS INC 466.2S1.50 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.S3;� 114593 PLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE 179.20 HARDWARE N 09.92 _ SAFETY SUPPLIES - I 114595 POLYPURE INC 215.282.07 CATIONIC POLYMER H.O.3-11-07 A 114596 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO 9931.63 RLECTRIC SUPPLIES l"ftt4R97 PDMrR SYSTEMS IS f 26+06 _._INSTRUMENT PARTS _ --I 11459E PREMIUM COMM OF AMERICA f16.OS2.50 VIM PROD. "�VIl_§Mw-A$7ff_r§= 0 N 114599 PRESENTATION PRODUCTS $219.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES ___LlsAu Hull D PRIMPOSE Ter 1114.00 ICE _ 114601 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. $4.256.00 IESTRUMB AT—NT ION IN&P CT - -5r 114602 PUBLISH 529.95 PUBLICATION 2fA60S 0 SALES - EARTNQUAE SAFETY f1gjA4.34 EARTHQUAKE SAFETY HOLDDOWNS 114604 RAIM(OY DISPOSAL CO fId74.90 ------TR118N kEMOVA-G------ -- I146 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO.. INC l99.13 LAB 9UPPLIR3 1146960E PECYC INC t$1.6II.}�_--_._ RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.7-11-00 114600 RED CORPVALVE ( REDLINE ENT f1 A40.80 IltVALVES SWEePiRff — 11460E R[D YALYE CO INC tH.80 VALVES FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORMING CAPITAL RRDCESSINO DATE 3/I6/91 RABE 6 A REPORT NUMBER AP43 RLME CQUNTV I CLAIRS PAID 35/22/91 PDSTING DATE 05/22/91 ITT WARRANT NO, VENDOR AMOUNT SLB.0 3I PLLD.N___ 114609 RED KING SHOES $104.26 SAFETY SHOES 11a610 REDI EAPRESS A32.35 COURIEM SSkVICB —_ 1I1611 REMEDY TEMP 13.742.58 TEMPORARY SERVICES L14612 REMOTE METER RESETTING SYST 15.030.00 POSTAGE 114613 THE RrP11BL 1[ Rtippi E [n t .]6 LUMBING BUPPLI68 ss7 -- - MECHAN-- -ARTS----- - 11161a RCN OLO ROBERTSINC. $I37.00 MECHANICAL PARTS 13/615 J R OBER CORP !WHET.00 CONSTRUCTION J-23-1 a0 _ CONSTRUCTION J-7-9 314617 J R ROBERTS $5.455.79 CONSTRUCTION J-27 I14618 GEORGE ROBERTSON 1661.05 MEETING 6 TRAVEL EXPENSE .AIB INSTRUMENT PART C7 171690 PEGGY RUPP 1525.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION m 11/621 RUTLAND TOOL A SUPPLY $I8.34 MACHINE REPAIRS _____ STEEL n 114623 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP 1172.10 PARTS CLEANER 114624 SAFETY SUPPLY OF AMERICA 8167./2 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 114"A RANCOR ENGINEERING IN, L3DD.0B MANHOLE COATING DEBT m 11/626 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $1.159.27 ELECTRIC MOTOR 3 III627 DOU6 SAR Y15 1530.00 MEETING 6 TRAINING EXPENSE 21 n.Re _ MEETING 6 TMINING EXPENSE 110629 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT-L 881.810.17 OCEAN MONITORING R.O.fi-IS- 114630 SEA COAST DESIGNS $2,107.20 OFFICE FURNITURE SDIAD9 „___INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES _ 00 12463E SHAMROCK SUPPLY 12.306.99 HARDWARE 1 114633 SHURELUCK SALES 11.939.21 TOOLS 1AILU'le __ PHYSICAL EXAMS _ r11R635 SLIDE MASTER 199.1E FNESENTATIORAID r 114636 SMITH-EMERY CO $220.00 SOIL TESTING H.0.6-14-89 31.1R TRAINING_REGISTRATION Il/6!8 SOFT WAREHOUSE/WESTERN REDID 1270.98 COMPUTER 9Orw 114639 SORRENSCHEIR NATH 6 ROSENTH $1,752.75 LEGAL SERVICES - PERSONNEL In 114640 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY0.60 PERMIT FEES A 116661 SO CALIF COASTAL WATER 826B.OB 0.00 CCNRPR IEEE ur 114642 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO 125.027.16 POWE.R (•I A1AA69 ED CAL GAS CO al..1j +SO— NATIONAL GAS .,._ 1214644 SO -CALIF WATER CO $32.I8 —AATEATi9E In 1166/5 SOUVENIR PHOTO $235.26 PHOTO SERVICES DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS 114647 STAMEN 2 SPASSOFF RE 11.130.00 . Nye RFNO--S6W4ECgS7I=30-7 114648 WESTALLOY INC $913.28 MELDING SUPPLIES 114,49 STAR TOOL L SUPPLY CO sm uL rL_---_------TOOL S I14650 STERLING ART 15L.59 RRT 86P�EY88 114651 SUMMIT STEEL 11.019.55 STBBL 691.00 _ CONTRACT GROUNDSKESPING M.0.8-9-89 114693 SUNSET FORD 139.76 --'ERUC7f-R TW- 114634 SUPER CHEM CORP $1.529.60 — — — JANITORIAL SUPPLIES OU a 1 i a F UU( 9199 JT PAST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DRTE 5116191 PAGE 7 ' REPORT NUM BCR APR1 I - CLAIMS PAID 75122/91 POSTING DATE OS/22/91 V —WARRANT IN. VFNOnR LSDUwy 114655 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL INC S8.614.17 TOOLS PRINTING I1,4657 NAMIN TALEBI $51.00 H86TING i TRAINING EAPB SB 6 114658 TAUBER ELECTRONICS $971.21 BATTERIES 192.62______. 114660 TECHNICAL PRODUCTS S CTRLS 02.229.07 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES ` 114661 CMAPLES E THOMAS $900.51 TRUCK PARTS .21 SECURITY LOCKS _ 114663 TOTAL PREVENTION SYSTEMS 91,000.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-27-1 114664 TOWNE ADVERTISERS $40.97 PRINTING n .uc6N TRAV FL TR Avn 51.50I.1.0__________. _._TRAVEL SERVICES H.0.6-13-90 m 114666 NO TREPICE CO $211.01 INSTRUMENT PARTS m 114667 IS TRIPP 91.159.00 WINDOW CLEANING ZTRUCK I AUTO qUPPiViftn.&T _TRUCK PARTS y 114669 JG TUCKER f SON INC 5919.52 INBTRUMENT PARTS 114670 TWINING LABORATORIES OF 15.490.00 SOIL TESTING H.0.6-14-09 .uv. uION SIGN rn SSL5.11e SAFETY SUPPLIER m 114672 THE UNISOURCE CORP i114.97 PAGER m 114673 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $169.72 PARCEL SERVICES .g1e_ee LAB SERVICES Z 114675 VWR SCIENTIFIC 52.357.74 LAB SUPPLIES 114676 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO $9.605.39 PLUMBING SUPPLIES W 114670 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY f991.OS SAFETY SUPPLI68 U 114679 VILLAGE NURSERIES S16.57 GROUND NSURR Sl.l3_ LIAR. IINSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 114681 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $41.210.89 CAUSTIC SODA N.o.S-B-90 r 11466E CHARLES WHITE $100.36 MEETING i TRAINING EXPENSES f— e1 ___ OFFICE SUPPLIES _ U7 114604 YILLDAN ASSOCIATES 12.735.04 -ENGINEERING SERVICES - - .r 114685 XEROX CORP $1.013.29 COPIHR LEASES fn -Bg_ VALVES "0 114607 EVERETT H YORK CO 5114.60 ENCINN-FA— RTS .'O H 11468E 21rRAR YOUN6 PP00 f1.346.03 OFFICE SUPPLI68 lrP en T ix AND II orR IIS5ag54.1T _ CONSTRUCTION P2-92-1 -n1 114690 RICHARD B EDGAR 1200.00 -BBFEARS6 Cif plsbg S�TROT=lSA Cn ----------------- TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 05/22/91 15.993.599.71 UU V a FUND NO 9199 - JT DI6T WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE O5/16/91 PAGE 8 by REPORT NUMBER APES ICOUNTY SANITATION3FOE"ZbONTF--- _ 00 CLAIMS PAID 05/22/91 POSTING DATE 05/22/91 SUMMARY AMOUNT 62 OPER FUND $10,706.62 —_ -- - 62 CAP PAC I= 620,156.3E 3 OP6R POND --M,122-77--__— E3 CAP PAC FUND $8.67 65 OP6PA FUND $26,108.21 C PAC FOND 629ET1— 96 OPER FUND $606.97 n 7 OPBR 6271062.1E GP FAC Fn UND 4E',3bS.56 m 611 OPER FUND $6,072.70 C K1E OPER FUND 692.1E n PAC FUND#24 CAP 9566 OPER FUND 63E2.E8 r-i 9586 CAP PAC FUND $9.17 TD .03"r__.___._. 3 JT OPER FUND $681,471.30 CORF $4,626,932.50 2 SELF FUNDED iNsURANcz Funus 9116;U".., O JT DIET WORKING CAPITAL FVNO 6EE0,380.47 -----i--�7-- CO vuweu...... tV r r .. Fn --1 N bl QO C , COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA IMAA ELY9 AVENUE P.O.IWX 0127 MUNTMN VALLEY,CALIWPNM 0272 0127 May 21, 1991 11 U143982.2411 i MEMORANDUM TO: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager FM: Ted Hoffman, Purchasing Manager RE: Purchase of Thirteen (13) Four Wheel Electric Cargo Carriers, Specification No. A-152 Sealed bids were opened on Tuesday, May 14, 1991 for the purchase of Thirteen (13) Each Four-Wheel Electric Cargo Carriers. Tabulation of bids is as follows: VENDOR UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE 1. Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing, Co. $4,200.00 $ 54,600.00 Anaheim, CA 2. Southwest Material Handling, Inc. 4,487. 00 58,331.00 Anaheim, CA It is recommended the award be made to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company, 'Anaheim, low bidder, for a total of 54,600.00 plus sales tax. Res so uyiy Submitted, Ted Hof fma , Purchasing Manager We hereby c r with the foregoing recommendation: G ry Str ed, Edwin E. Hodges Director of Finance Assistant Director of Maintenance TH:mn "C" AGENDA ITEM NO, 9(a)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "C" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CAEIFORNIA 1p EWE AVENUE May 21, 1991 as 8=812E wuNruN vsuEr.cwwNNu exrleeln MEMORANDUM n1419524A11 TO: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager FM: Ted Hoffman, Purchasing Manager RE: Purchase of Five (5) Each Four Wheel Electric Personnel Carriers, Specification No. A-153 Sealed bids were opened on Tuesday, May 14, 1991 for the purchase of Five (5) Each Four-Wheel Electric Personnel Carriers. Tabulation of bids is as follows: VENDOR UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE 1. Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing, Co. $3, 600.00 $ 18,000.00 Anaheim, CA 2. Southwest Material Handling, Inc. 3,879.00 19,395.00 1 I Anaheim, CA v.r� It is recommended the award be made to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company, Anaheim, low bidder, for a total of 18,000.00 plus sales tax. Respeq filly Submitted, Ted 'Ho • an, Purchasing Manager We ereby concur with the foregoing recommendation: n C . ary Str ed, Edwin E. Hodgesy Director of Finance Assistant Director of Maintenance TH:mn "D" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(a)(2) - ALL DISTRICTS "D" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS AI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA May 21, 1991 10 Ews AVEWE " 80.e@l �� MEMORANDIIM EOYMNN VA Y.f FORMA 927284+27 mneazsAn To: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager From: Ted Hoffman, Purchasing Manager Re: Purchase of One (1) Combination High Pressure rater And vacuum sewer Cleaning Truck, Specification No. A-154 Sealed bids were opened on Tuesday, May 21, 1991, for the purchase of One (1) Combination High Pressure Water and Vacuum Sewer Cleaning Truck. Tabulation of bids received is as follows: Bidder Base Price *Option A Total 1. Haaker Equipment Co. $219,610. $13 , 000. $232 , 610. Pomona (I.H.C. Chassis) IA. Masker Equipment Co. 220, 560. 13 , 000. 233 ,560. Pomona (Ford Chassis) 2. Westrux Int'1, Inc. 220,296. 13, 000. 233 ,296. Cypress (I.H.C. Chassis) 3 . Balar Equipment Co. 239, 000. 13, 000. 253 , 000. Phoenix (I.H.C. Chassis) 4. Sancon Engineering, Inc. 226,000. 3 ,500. 229,500.- Santa Ana (I.H.C. Chassis) 5. Dew-Par Sales No-Bid No-Bid No-Bid Mission Viejo + Option A represents a water reclamation system. Sancon Engineering, the apparent low bidder, including Option A, does nut Lueet the Districts' specifications. It is recommended their bd be rejected. It is further recommended the award be made to H8akAr Equipment Company, lowest responsible bidder for their Proposal No. 1 with the International Harvester Chassis, for an amount of *232, 610.00, plus sales tax. Heaps-:.'Zolyly Submitted, Ted H ff'Arfiry Purchasing Manager We hereby Concyr with the foregoing recommendation: ary St eed, Edwin E. Hodges, Directdt of Finance Assistant Director of Maintenance "E" AGENDA ITEM NO. 0(b) - ALL DISTRICTS ^� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Six (6) CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE June 12. 1991 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 34,319.00 In accordance with contract provisions', the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - CONNECT BACKFLOW PREVENTER TO THE FIRE ALARM CONTROL BOARD The Contractor was directed to install conduit and connections from the 6-inch backflow preventer outside the building to the Fire Alarm Control Panel inside the building in Room 124 per Plan Change No. 9. This item of work is required for the fire protection of the building. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 9, FCO 24) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,728.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - PROVIDE FRAME FOR DOUBLE DOORS AT DUMPSTER AREA The Contractor was directed to provide a top frame and structural tube header over the double doors at the dumpster area (Door No. 46) . These additional supports were needed to provide structural stability to these large double doors. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2 i B of the General Provisions. (Reference: RFI 207R, FCO 27 ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 899.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "F-1" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(6) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Six (6) CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE June 12, 1991 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY. JOB NO. J-17 Item 3 - ADD DEPTH TO STORM DRAIN, CATCH BASINS AND SEWER LINES The Contractor was directed to construct 190 feet of the off-site storm drain and 300 feet of sewer line two feet deeper than shown. The added excavation was required when an existing electrical conduit was found to be in the pipe zone. The Contractor was also directed to clean out an existing sewer line that was being connected to these facilities. The Contractor was further directed to place concrete slurry around the sewer and storm drain manhole to protect other existing utilities; add sand around the sewer line due to unsuitable backfill material and to construct two additional catch basins per Plan Change No. 6. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: Plan Change No. 6 and RFI No. 144, FCO No. 31) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 10,275.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 - EXHAUST FAN FILTER SUPPORTS ABOVE ROOF The Contractor was directed to add 3 x 10 redwood intermediate supports and hangers between the wideflange beams under the exhaust fan filters. The filters are not designed to be solely supported by the wideflange beams. This item of work is required to provide adequate support for the filters. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: RFI 194, FCO 32) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,200.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "F-2" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS ""F-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Six (6) CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE June 12, 1991 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 Item 5 - PROVIDE FLASHING OVER ALL STOREFRONT WINDOWS The Contractor was directed to install aluminum thru-wall flashing over all storefront window heads and have all exposed edges painted. This item of work is required to prevent potential water leaks which could occur at the tops of the windows. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 33, Letter from architect dated May 16, 1991) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 15,217.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 34,319.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date March 1, 1990 Original Contract Time 420 Calendar Days Original Completion Date April 24, 1991 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 251 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 671 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date December 31, 1991 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 7,090,000.00 Prev. Auth. Chan es $ 702 702.31 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 34,319.00 Amended Contract Price $ 7,827,021.31 "F-3" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE `..� FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Six (6) CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE June 12. 1991 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 Board Authorization Date: June 12, 1991 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED BY: RECOMMENDED BY: Engineer Zate Co9ftruction Manager Date APPRO Y: APPROVED ASS�T-O/ FORM: 11frector of Engineering Date G eral Counsel Date I/ J J. R. ROBERTS CORPORATION ACCEPTED BY: jj� Q �7c L 4"�k Contractor Date "F-4" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 2 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE June 12, 1991 JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 11,436.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - ADD NEW TERMINAL BOX AND PAIR CABLES AT CONTROL CENTER BUILDING Contract Drawing 5I01 (Note 7) requires that the Contractor reroute three existing 36-pair cables, currently routed to the Information Services Building, into the Control Center Building. However, field investigations determined that there was not a sufficient length of cable to reach the Control Center Building. This plan change adds a new terminal box in Power Building IA. The existing cable was routed to this new terminal box and three new 36-pair cables were routed from the new terminal box into the Control Center Building. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 30-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 11,436.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 11,436.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. "G-1" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 2 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 -ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE June 12, 1991 JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1. Job No. J-19-1 SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date February 21, 1991 Original Contract Time 600 Calendar Days Original Completion Date October 12, 1992 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time Not Applicable Revised Final Completion Due Date Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 15,410,855.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 11,436.00 Amended Contract Price $ 15,422,291.00 Board Authorization Date: June 12, 1991 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUB IT D B REVODED BY, Engineer Date C nstruction Manager Date APPR BY: AP VED AS TO FO Director of Engineering Date General Co nsel Date HUNTER CORPORATION ACCEPT BY: S-zi-9i Contractor Date "G-2" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-2" COUNTY SANITATIIii DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 4 - P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 `ash CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Eleven (11) CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH & ALPER DATE June 12, 1991 JOB: GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-34-1 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 14,968.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item I - REROUTE OF CABLE TRAYS This item provides for rerouting two cable trays in Tunnel No. 4 and Tunnel No. 7 to allow a 36-inch wide walkway through these tunnels. Contract drawings show these two cable trays routed side by side down the tunnels and into the basement of the Gas Compressor Building (Reference: Drawings 1E04, 1E05) . This side by side routing only allows a 27-inch walkway between the cable trays and the pipe racks on the opposite wall of the tunnels (OSHA requires 30-inch minimum width aisles) . The reroute of the cable trays also required the reroute of the high pressure digester gas line, drain line, heating water supply and return lines, digester cleaning lines and adjustment of pipe racks in the basement of the Gas Compressor Building. This item of work was negotiated with the .Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH P1341-031) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 10,410.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - REROUTE TWO EXISTING FERRIC CHLORIDE LINES This item is for the rerouting of two existing ferric chloride (FECL) lines routed through Intersection H. The contract drawings show the north half of this tunnel intersection being demolished to facilitate the connection of the proposed new construction of Tunnel No. 6 (Reference: Drawing 1Y14) . The two existing FECL lines were routed along the wall to be demolished and also down the existing portion of Tunnel No. 6 to an existing FECL facility. The FECL lines were rerouted to avoid the reconstruction of Intersection H and related pipe systems. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,613.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "H-1" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Eleven (11) CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH & ALPER DATE June 12, 1991 JOB: GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-34-1 Item 3 - UPGRADE ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT This item provides for the upgrading of electrical circuit No. GCA402A which feeds power to the Gas Compressor Building sump pumps (Reference: Drawing 3EO3) . The circuit shown in the contract drawings is not capable of providing power to both sump pumps operating simultaneously. This item upgrades circuit No. GCA402A to provide a 3-pole, 30-ampere trip circuit breaker and four No. 10 AWG conductors in a 1-inch conduit which will be capable of operating both sump pumps at the same time. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 305.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 - LIGHTING FIXTURES IN THE CONTROL ROOM This item is for the installation of four type "A" lighting fixtures in the control room of the City Water Pump Station instead of the type "B" fixtures shown on Contract Drawing 4E01. The type "A" fixtures are 2-foot by 4-foot fluorescent recessed type which are suitable for installation with the suspended ceiling system proposed in the control room of the City Water Pump Station (Reference: Drawing 4SO2, 66-0803) . The four type "B" fixtures required by the original contract drawings are to be turned over to District personnel . This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH P1341-029) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,121.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 5 - INSTALLATION OF CONDENSATE DRAINS AT TUNNEL NO. 5 This item provides for the installation of condensate drains at the low point of each section of 12-inch high pressure air (HPA) lines in Tunnel No. 5 and Tunnel No. 8. These condensate drains are not shown in the contract drawings (Reference: Drawings 1Y19, 1Y23, 1Y29 and 1Y25) . Each drain assembly includes a 2-inch thread-o-let welded to the bottom of the 12-inch HPA line, 2-inch schedule 40 steel pipe per Division 65, screwed fittings, and one 2-inch ball valve per Division 65. Each drain shall be routed to the nearest tunnel drainage groove. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH P1341-032) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,519.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "H-2" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 4 _-- P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Eleven (11) CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH & ALPER DATE June 12. 1991 JOB: GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-34-1 TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 14,968.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time extension is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME - Original Contract Date February 27, 1990 Original Contract Time 730 Calendar Days Original Completion Date February 26, 1992 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 730 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date February 26, 1992 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 13,098,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 244,119.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 14.968.00 _ Amended Contract Price $ 13,357,087.00 "H-3- AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE .� FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Eleven (11) CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH 8 ALPER DATE June 12, 1991 JOB: GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-34-1 Board Authorization Date: June 12, 1991 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED BY: RECOMMENDED BY: Engineer Date C nstruction Manager Date APPROVED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Director of Engineering Date General Counsel Date ZIEBARTH 8 ALPER ACCEPTED BY: ' Q�-")".. 5- I -q ) Cont c 4 r` r Date "H-4" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-4" RESOLUTION NO. 91-80 ' APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 8 TO AGREEMENT WITH SAIC FOR OCEAN MONITORING CONTRACT SERVICES FOR CSDOC 120-INCH OCEAN OUTFALL, SPECIFICATION NO. S-032 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 8 TO AGREEMENT WITH SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION (SAIC) FOR OCEAN MONITORING CONTRACT SERVICES FOR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 120-INCH OCEAN OUTFALL, SPECIFICATION NO. S-032, EXTENDING CONTRACT FROM JULY 1, 1991 TO JUNE 30, 1992 WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 120-Inch Ocean Outfall , Specification No. S-032; and, WHEREAS, Amendment No. 1 provided for the acquisition of additional laboratory instrumentation and authorized additional laboratory work to perform analyses on ocean sediments for trace constituents to comply with additional requirements imposed by the Environmental Protection Agency; and, WHEREAS, Amendment No. 2 provided for modifications to the Current Monitoring Program required by EPA; and. WHEREAS, Amendment No. 3 extended the contract from July 1, 1986, to June 30, 1987; and, WHEREAS, Amendment No. 4 extended the contract from July 1, 1987 to June 30, 1988; and, WHEREAS, Amendment No. 5 extended the contract from July 1, 1988 to June 30, 1989 and provided for program modifications for the contract period from July 1, 1987 through June 30, 1988 as well as the fourth year of said contract, July 1, 1988 through June 30, 1989; and provided for a reduction in fees to be negotiated for years one, two and three of said contract; and, "I-1" AGENDA ITEM NO . 9(9) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-1" WHEREAS, Amendment No. 6 extended the contract from July 1 , 1989 to June 30, 1990; and, WHEREAS, Amendment No. 7 extended the contract from July 1, 1990 to June 30, 1991; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend the agreement to extend the existing contract from July 1, 1991 to June 30, 1992; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with the established procedures for selection of professional services, the Selection Committee has negotiated and certified a fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Amendment No. 8 dated July 1, 1991, to that certain agreement dated August 7, 1985, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 120-Inch Ocean Outfall , Specification No. 5-032, providing for extension of the existing contract from July 1, 1991 through June 30, 1992 (Contract Period Seven), is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased by $1,856,923.00 for the seventh year of said contract, increasing the total authorized compensation from $9,660,458.00 to $11,517,381.00; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for Itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Amendment No. 8 in form approved by the General Counsel . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 12, 1991. "I-2" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(g) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ` P.O. BOX 6127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS.FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 '°ee eW (714)962-2411 May 22, 1991 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California . 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Rates for Professional Survey Services with Bush 8 Associates in Connection with Survey Services for Various Collection System and Treatment Plant Projects, Specification No. S-051 In accordance with the District's procedures for selection of professional services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following rates with Bush 8 Associates for surveying and associated services, on an hourly-rate basis including labor, overhead, direct expenses and profit, as follows: Licensed Surveyor $ 6B.00/Hour Two-Man Crew $124.00/Hour Three-Man Crew $164.00/Hour Draftsperson $ 40.00/Hour Supplies and Materials At Cost Maximum Escalation Rate 92/93 3.0% Maximum Escalation Rate 93/94 3.0% Minimum Hours Billed per Callout 0.50 Hrs. Minimum Charge for Travel $ 0.00 "J-1" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(h)(1) (a) - ALL DISTRICTS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA Boards of Directors ,ueaA ELLIS AVENUE May 22, 1991 Eo eoxx,xs Page Two FWWMN VALEEr.CLLIFMMA xx72x9,27 maeaz.x.n The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/A. B. Catlin /s/William Mahone A. . atlin iam Mahoney Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Richard B. Ed ar /s/Don R. Griffin Richard B. Edgar on R. Griffin Past Joint Chairman Past Joint Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Thomas M. Dawes Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering Selection Committee "J-2" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(h) (1) (a) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-2"" RESOLUTION NO. 91-81 APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BUSH 8 ASSOCIATES INC. FOR SURVEYING- SERVICES FOR VARIOUS COLLECTION SYSTEM AND TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS, SPECIFICATION NO. 5-051 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11. 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BUSH 8 ASSOCIATES INC. FOR SURVEYING SERVICES FOR VARIOUS COLLECTION SYSTEM AND TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS, SPECIFICATION NO. S-051 WHEREAS, the Boards of Drectors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with Bush 8 Associates Inc. for Surveying Services for Various Collection System and Treatment Plant Projects, Specification No. S-051; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of Directors on April 10, 1991, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has negotiated and certified the final negotiated fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Professional Services Agreement dated June 12, 1991, by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County and Bush 8 Associates Inc. for Surveying Services for Various Collection System and Treatment Plant Projects, Specification No. S-051, is hereby approved and accepted; and. Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in "K-1" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(h) (1) (b) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-1" accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, on an hourly-rate basis for labor including overhead, direct expenses and profit, for a total amount not to exceed $75,000.00 for a one-year period beginning June 12, 1991, as follows: Licensed Surveyor $ 68.00/Hour Two-Man Crew 124.00/Hour Three-Man Crew 164.00/Hour Draftsperson 40.00/Hour Supplies and Materials At Cost Maximum Escalation Rate 91/92 3.0% Maximum Escalation Rate 92/93 3.0% Minimum Hours Billed per Callout 0.50 Hours Minimum Charge for Travel 0.00 Section 3. That the Lhairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for `./ itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 12, 1991. "K-2" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(h) (1 ) (b) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 wc.F 106N.ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714)962-2411 May 22, 1991 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Rates for Professional Survey Services with Clifford A. Forkert Civil Engineer in Connection with Survey Services for Various Collection System and Treatment Plant Projects, Specification No. S-051 In accordance with the District's procedures for selection of professional services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following rates with - Clifford A. Forkert Civil Engineer for surveying and associated services, on an hourly-rate basis including labor, overhead, direct expenses and profit, as follows: Licensed Surveyor-Civil Engineer $ 60.00/Hour Field Surveyor $ 50.00/Hour Two-Man Crew $110.00/Hour Three-Man Crew $157.00/Hour Draftsperson $ 36.00/Hour Supplies and Materials At Cost Maximum Escalation Rate 92/93 3.0% Maximum Escalation Rate 93/94 3.0% Minimum Hours Billed per Callout 0 Minimum Charge for Travel $ 0.00<25 miles radius $ 0.40>50 miles total , "L-1" AGENDA ITEM NO, 9(h)(2)(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA Boards of Directors 1a E.'s AVENUE May 22, 1991 ea EO%8127 Page Two EOUMYN VAUEY.MIMRMA W7MO127 olnwp ,, The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/A. B. Catlin /s/William Mahone A. B. Catlin William ahoney Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Richard B. Ed ar /s/Don R. Griffin Richard B. dgar on R. Griffin Past Joint Chairman Past Joint Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee Lr1 /s/Thomas M. Dawes Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering Selection Committee "L-2" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(h)(2)(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-2" RESOLUTION NO. 91-82 APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH LIFFORD A. FORKERT, CIVIL ENGINEER , I FOR SURVEYING SERVICES FOR VARIOUS COLLECTION SYSTEM AND TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS, SPECIFICATION NO. 5-051 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS , OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CLIFFORD A. FORKERT, CIVIL ENGINEER, FOR SURVEYING SERVICES FOR VARIOUS COLLECTION SYSTEM AND TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS, SPECIFICATION NO. 5-051 WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional services; and. WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with Clifford A. Forkert, Civil Engineer, for Surveying Services for Various Collection System and Treatment Plant Projects, Specification No. 5-051; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of Directors on April 10, 1991, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has negotiated and certified the final negotiated fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Professional Services Agreement dated June 12, 1991, by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County and Clifford A. Forkert, Civil Engineer, for Surveying Services for Various Collection System and Treatment Plant Projects, Specification No. 5-051, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in "M-1" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(h) (2)(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "M-1" accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, on an hourly-rate basis for labor including overhead, direct expenses and profit, for a total �.../ amount not to exceed $75,000.00 for a one-year period beginning June 12, 1991, as follows: Licensed Surveyor-Civil Engineer $ 60.00/Hour Field Surveyor 50.00/Hour Two-Man Crew 110.00/Hour Three-Man Crew 157.00/Hour Draftsperson 36.00/Hour Supplies and Materials At Cost Maximum Escalation Rate 91/92 3.0% Maximum Escalation Rate 92/93 3.0% Minimum Hours Billed per Callout 0 Minimum Charge for Travel 0.00<25 mile radius 0.40>50 miles total o..d Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 12, 1991. "M-2" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(h)(2) (b) - ALL DISTRICTS "M-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA -n. P.O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 yk, Y 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 l 4v°,cW (714)962-2411 �✓ May 22, 1991 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Rates for Professional Survey Services with DGA Consultants in Connection with Survey Services for Various Collection System and Treatment Plant Projects, Specification No. S-051 In accordance with the District's procedures for selection of professional services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following rates with DGA Consultants for surveying and associated services, on an hourly-rate basis including labor, overhead, direct expenses and profit, as follows: Licensed Surveyor E 60.00/Hour Two-Man Crew E130.00/Hour Three-Man Crew E164.00/Hour Draftsperson E 53.00/Hour Supplies and Materials At Cost Maximum Escalation Rate 92/93 3.0% Maximum Escalation Rate 93/94 3.0% Minimum Hours Billed per Callout 0 Minimum Charge for Travel Included "N-1'" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(h) (3) (a) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA Boards of Directors ICBM ELLIS AVENUE May 22. 1991 on Box 8127 `..� Page Two ECUNIAIW VALLEY.CALIFORNIA9Blze.e127 7I110002AII The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/A. B. Catlin /s/William Mahone A. atlin i 1 am ahoney Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Richard B. Ed ar /s/Don R. Griffin Richard B. Edgar on R. Griffin Past Joint Chairman Past Joint Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Thomas M. Dawes Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering Selection Committee "N-2" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(h) (3) (a) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-2" RESOLUTION NO. 91-83 APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH DGA CONSULTANT INC. , FOR SURVEYING SERVICES FOR VARIOUS COLLEC ION SYSTEM AND TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS, SPECIFICATION N0. 5-051 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH DGA CONSULTANTS, INC. , FOR SURVEYING SERVICES FOR VARIOUS COLLECTION SYSTEM AND TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS, SPECIFICATION NO. S-051 t k k k k k k f k k f f f f k f k WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with DGA Consultants, Inc. , for Surveying Services for Various Collection System and Treatment Plant Projects, Specification No. S-051; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of Directors on April 10, 1991, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has negotiated and certified the final negotiated fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 59 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Professional Services Agreement dated June 12, 1991, by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County and DGA Consultants, Inc. , for Surveying Services for Various Collection System and Treatment Plant Projects, Specification No. S-051, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in `a✓ 110-11, AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(h) (3) (b) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-1" accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, on an hourly-rate basis for labor including overhead, direct expenses and profit, plus out-of-pocket expenses at cost, as follows: Licensed Surveyor b 60.00/Hour Two-Man Crew 130.00/Hour Three-Man Crew 164.00/Hour Draftsperson 53.00/Hour Supplies and Materials At Cost Maximum Escalation Rate 91/92 3.0% Maximum Escalation Rate 92/93 3.0% Minimum Hours Billed per Callout -0- Minimum Charge for Travel Included Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 12, 1991. "0-2" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(h)(3) (b) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272MI27 x 10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708.7018 m°+aec� (714)962-2411 May 22, 1991 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 927.08-7018 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Professional Engineering Services with John Carollo Engineers in Connection with Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43 In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with John Carollo Engineers for the preparation of design, plans and specifications, and construction support services for Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. PI-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43, on an hourly-rate basis including �,,,✓ labor plus overhead, direct expenses, subconsultants, and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed $1,914,805.00. Engineering Services, (hourly rates including labor plus overhead at 156%), not to exceed $1,359,589.20 Construction Support Services and Preparation of 08M Manuals, (hourly rates including labor plus overhead at 160%) , not to exceed 223,425.80 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 67,990.00 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 34,200.00 Fixed Profit 229,600.00 TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed $1.914,605.00 "P-1" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9( i ) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "P-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Boards of Directors 1DBM Ews AVENUE May 22, 1991 Fo.SOX 0127 / Page Two MOUNTAIN VAU.Er."UFDBMA 92720.0127 �I nulseam++ The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/A. B. Catlin /s/William Mahone A. B. Catlin William ahoney Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Richard B. Edgar /s/Don R. Griffin Richard B. Edgar Don R. Griffin Past Joint Chairman Past Joint Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Thomas M. Dawes Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering Selection Committee "P-2" AGENDA ITEM NO, 9( 1 > (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "P-2" RESOLUTION NO. 91-84 APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH J OHN AROLLO ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES RE JOB NOS. P1-38 AND P2-43 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES FOR MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-38, AND MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-43 WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with John Carollo Engineers for design and construction support services for Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of Directors on November 8, 1989, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has negotiated and certified the final negotiated fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts . Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the proposed Professional Services Agreement is for a project which is a portion of the previously-approved 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The project is to be designed as per the Master Plan approval . In accordance with the California Environmental Quality "0 1" AGENDA ITEM NO . 90 ) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "0 1" Act of 1970, as amended, and Section 15163 of the Districts' Guidelines, a Final Program Environmental Impact Report on the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan covering this project was approved by the Districts' Boards of Directors on July 19, 1989; and, Section 2. That the certain Professional Services Agreement dated June 12, 1991, by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County and John Carollo Engineers, for design and construction support services for Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 3. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows: Professional Services, at hourly rates for labor plus overhead at 156%, not to exceed E1,359,589.20 Construction Support Services and Preparation of O&M Manuals, at hourly rates for labor plus overhead at 160%, not to exceed 223,425.80 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 67,990.00 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 34,200.00 Fixed Profit 229,600.00 TOTAL, not to exceed $1,914,805.00 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, S. 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 12, 1991. "0-2" AGENDA ITEM NO. 010 ) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction DATE June 12, 1991 JOB: Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer. between Broadwav and Orangethoroe Avenue (including City of Anaheim Street Improvements). Contract No. 2-26-3: Katella Relief Sewer. between Euclid Street and Walnut Street (Ninth Street) Contract No. 2-28: and Orangewood Diversion Sewer. Contract No. 2-29 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 143,363.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Contract No. 2-26-3 Item 1 - ADDITIONAL WORK FOR WATER LINE LEAKAGE The City of Anaheim made repairs to a 2-inch water line at Station No. 12+50 on Euclid Street north of Broadway. The City crew's reconnection of the line subsequently leaked over several days of attempted repairs, wetting the Contractor's compacted fill . The leakage made it necessary for the Contractor to re-excavate and recompact the area in order to meet the job specifications. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,435.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - UNDISCLOSED SEWER LATERALS The Contractor encountered four undisclosed sewer laterals at the stations shown below. In order to construct the sewer trunk in comformance with OCSD specifications it was necessary to add a manhole at each of these laterals to avoid direct connections of laterals to the sewer trunk thus preventing sewer gas migration back into the building serviced by referenced laterals. Costs include temporary bypass at each location. Station No. Amount 19+90 $19,273.00 26+50 $21,463.00 30+64 $19,560.00 37+28 $22,675.00 $82,971.00 This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 82,971.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "R-1" AGENDA ITEM NO, 9(m) - DISTRICT 2 "R-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE `./ FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction DATE June 12, 1991 JOB: Port'on of Euclid Interceptor Sewer. between Broadwayand Oran ethor e Avenue including City of Anaheim Street Improvements), Contract No. 2-26-3 Katella Relief Sewer. between Euclid Street and Walnut Street (Ninth Street Contract No. 2-28: and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29 Contract No. 2-29 Item 3 - ADDITIONAL K-RAIL ON ORANGEWOOD AVENUE The proximity of the pipeline trench to the shoulder of the nearest traffic lane on Orangewood Avenue caused the City of Anaheim, in conjunction with OCSO, to require K-railing alongside the trench. The K-rail reduces the potential of a serious accident by providing a safety barrier on this busy street. This work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 10,062.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 - UNDISCLOSED UTILITIES The Contractor encountered an undisclosed telephone cable at Station No. 18+28, on Orangewood Avenue just west of Dupont Drive while excavating for the new sewer line. There was a job delay while the telephone company was brought in to deter- mine the relocation plan and effect of same with the Contractor's work force. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,538.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 5 - TEMPORARY PROJECT DEMOBILIZATION The Contractor encountered an undisclosed utility, a large telephone duct bank at Station No. 10+06, Orangewood Avenue and State College Boulevard not shown on the contract drawings at the depth required for pipelay. The size of the duct bank and work required to relocate same, coupled with contractual obligations with the City of Anaheim to open the street by a specified date to accommodate Anaheim Stadium traffic, required that the project be demobilized and that unlaid pipe be purchased and stored by OCSD. Another change order will be initiated at a later date to reactivate this project. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 42,357.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "R-2- AGENDA ITEM NO, 9(m) - DISTRICT 2 "R-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction DATE June 12, 1991 JOB: Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Broadway and Oran ethor e Avenue including City of Anaheim Street Improvements) , Contract No. 2-26-3: Katella Relief Sewer. between Euclid Street and Walnut Street (Ninth Street; Contract No. 2-28: and Orangewood Diversion Sewer. Contract No. 2-29 TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 143,363.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date December 31, 1990 Original Contract Time 400 Calendar Days Original Completion Date February 3, 1992 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 400 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date February 3, 1992 Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 7,953,755.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 143,363.00 Amended Contract Price $ 8.097.118.00 "R-3" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(m) - DISTRICT 2 "R-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE \/ FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (I) CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction DATE June 12. 1991 JOB: Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer. between Broadway and Oran ethor e Avenue including City of Anaheim Street Improvements) . Contract Katella Relief Sewer. between Euclid Street and Walnut Street (Ninth Street) Contract No. 2-28: and Orangewood Diversion Sewer. Contract No. 2-29 Board Authorization Date: June 12, 1991 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED BY: RECOMMENDED BY: p- S/3- 9/ gyp- 4-4 t-/J-9/ E gineer Date C nstruction Manager Date APP V Y: APqQOVED AS TO FORM: Director of En ineering ate Gen ral Counsel Date STEVE BUBALO CONSTRUCTION ACCEPTED BY: � s isI i ( ntractor Date "R-4" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(m) - DISTRICT 2 "R-4" RESOLUTION NO. 91-87-3 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH THE WESTMINSTER REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH THE WESTMINSTER REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RE PAYMENT OF PROPORTIONAL ANNUAL TAX INCREMENT TO DISTRICT FOR SEWERAGE SERVICES WHEREAS, the Westminster Redevelopment Agency has proposed Amendment No. 4 to the Westminster Commerical Redevelopment Project No. 1; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Community Redevelopment Law, California Health and Safety Code Sections 33000 et sec . , the Sanitation District's ad valorem taxes in the redevelopment project area will be frozen at the 1990-91 base year levy; all subsequent annual tax increments accruing to the redevelopment agency during its life; and, WHEREAS, because the Sanitation District partially relies on ad valorem taxes to finance the cost of sewerage services which are escalating due to federally mandated requirements, energy impacts and inflationary trends; and, WHEREAS, recognizing that the freezing of taxes may result in inadequate ad valorem tax revenues to cover the cast of providing sewerage service to the redevelopment project areas, representatives of the Westminster Redevelopment Agency have agreed to pay the District eighty percent (80%) of its historical proportional share of the annual tax increment accruing to the agency to defray the cost of said service, on the same basis as other properties in the District. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Agreement dated June 12, 1991, by and between "S-1" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(n) - DISTRICT 3 "S-1" County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County and the Westminster Redevelopment Agency, providing for payment to the District of eighty percent (80%) of its historical proportional share of the annual tax increment from property in the Amendment No. 4 to Westminster Comercial Redevelopment Project No. 1 to pay for escalating costs of sewerage service on the same basis as other properties in the District, be, and is hereby, approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of District No. 3 in form approved by the General Counsel . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 12, 1991. `J "S-2" AGENDA ITEM NO . 9(n) - DISTRICT 3 „S-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS May 21, 1991 of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 10 SwS AVENUE MEMORANDUM ?a Sox nx7 N Aft VA Y.CSUI Aea7x 1 To: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager PMQWs411 From: Ted Hoffman, Purchasing Manager Re: Purchase of Two (2) Each Variable Frequency Drive Units, Specification No. E-199 Sealed bids were opened on Tuesday, May 14, 1991 for the purchase of Two (2) Each Variable Frequency Drive Units. Tabulation of bids is as follows: VENDOR PRICE 1. Emerson Industrial Controls, $47,188.00 c/o Power Systems Co. , La Habra 2. Industrial Systems, Inc. , South Gate $51,910.00 3 . Romac Supply, Los Angeles $55,796.00 4. R.A. Reed Electric Company, Los Angeles $55,810.00 5. Impact Equipment Company, Garden Grove $59,905.00 6. CED, Inc. , Costa Mesa $66,070.00 7. Kaman Industrial Technologies, Santa Ana $67,350.00 S. Rosen's Electrical Equipment Co. , $71,372.00 =- Montebello It is recommended that the award be made to Emerson Industrial Controls, c/o Power Systems Company, the lowest responsible bidder, for a total of $47,188.00 plus sales tax. Respectfully Submitted, Katherine Yarosh, Buyer We here y concur with the foregoing recommendation: 1 f Ted Hoffm any eed, Purchasing manager Directok of Finance C . Edwin E. Hodges, Assistant Director of Maintenance - - KY:mn "T" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(0) - DISTRICT 3 "T" RESOLUTION NO. 91-88-5 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH FOR A COOPERATIVE PROJECT TO INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION OF RAISED MEDIANS WITHIN PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY THROUGH CORONA DEL MAR IN DISTRICT'S— CONTRACT NO. 5-34-3 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH RELATIVE TO A COOPERATIVE PROJECT TO INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION OF RAISED MEDIANS WITHIN A PORTION OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY THROUGH CORONA DEL MAR IN DISTRICT'S PROJECT FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO BAYSIDE DRIVE TRUNK SEWER, PHASE 3, CONTRACT NO. 5-34-3, AND PROVIDING FOR EQUAL SHARING OF THE COST OF SAID MEDIANS Y Y k Y Y k Y k k k k k k Y Y Y WHEREAS, the City of Newport Beach desires to construct raised medians within a portion of Pacific Coast Highway through Corona del Mar; and, WHEREAS, the Sanitation District proposes to extend the gravity sewers to serve Corona del Mar and the developing areas south of Corona del Mar which will be accomplished in the project known as Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk V Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-34-3; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors, on November 14, 1990, determined that it was in the best interests of the District and the City to combine said work, and authorized staff to negotiate an agreement with the City of Newport Beach for a cooperative project to install said raised medians in conjunction with the District's project to construct Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-34-3, in order to minimize costs and construction impacts. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Agreement dated June 12, 1991, by and between County Sanitation District No. 5 and the City of Newport Beach, "U-1" AGENDA ITEM N0, 4(0) - DISTRICT 5 11U-1" providing for the District to construct raised medians within a portion of Pacific Coast Highway through Corona del Mar in con,juction with Improvements to Bayside Trunk Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-34-3, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the cost of construction of said raised medians (estimated to be $275,000.00) shall be shared equally by the District and the City of Newport Beach, pursuant to the terms and conditions of said agreement; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 12, 1991. "U-2,. AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(q) - DISTRICT 5 „U-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 2 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE �..� FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION CO. . DATE June 12, 1991 INC. JOB: BAKER FORCE MAINS. FROM MAIN STREET PUMP STATION TO BRISTOL STREET. CONTRACT NO. 14-1-2 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 7,600.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - ADDITIONAL BOND SUBMITTAL TO JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT AUTHORITY The Contractor was directed to submit a separate performance bond to the John Wayne Airport authority in addition to the bond required by the contract. This bond insures all airport property will be restored to the airport authority's satisfaction. The new sewer line is being constructed in part within an easement in the Jahn Wayne Airport authority property. Other costs might be incurred by the Contractor as a result of the requirements of this bond or by a possible extension of the bond. The District will reimburse the Contractor by a future change order if additional costs are incurred by the Contractor. This item caused an increase in the Contractor's cost to perform the contract work. An equitable adjustment shall be made per General Provisions Section 10-7. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 7,600.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 7,600.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time extension is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. "V-1" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(r) - DISTRICTS 7 & 14 "V-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 2 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: NLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION CO.. DATE June 12, 1991 INC. JOB: BAKER FORCE MAINS, FROM MAIN STREET PUMP STATION TO BRISTOL STREET, CONTRACT NO. 14-1-2 SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date January 28, 1991 Original Contract Time 360 Calendar Days Original Completion Date January 23, 1992 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time Not Applicable Revised Final Completion Due Date Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 5,773,395.00 , Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 7,600.00 Amended Contract Price $ 5,780,955.00 Board Authorization Date: June 12, 1991 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SITED BY: RE NDED BY- 9/ E ineer Date 5ohstruction Manager Date APP V BY: APPRO TO FQ ,M: 6 Director of-Engineering Date Gen6rel VCounsel Date MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION CO., INC ACCEP V S �9/ � ontractor a e "V-2" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(r) - DISTRICTS 7 & 14 "V-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE \./ FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: ALBERT W. DAVIES. INC. DATE June 12. 1991 JOB: CAMPUS RELIEF SEWER, BETWEEN VON KARMAN AVENUE AND JAMBOREE BOULEVARD. CONTRACT NO. 7-13 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 54,355.63 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item I - UNDISCLOSED UTILITY An undisclosed 6-inch VCP sewer lateral was found at Station No. 24+75. The Contractor was directed to connect a temporary bypass to maintain service until 21-inch VCP was laid and the shield moved, then restore permanent sewer lateral pipe. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,355.63 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - WEATHER DELAY DAYS The contract included an allowance of 5 calendar days for inclement weather. The Contractor was delayed 15 days because of rain; therefore, the Contractor is allowed a time extension of 10 calendar days. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 10 Calendar Days "W-1" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(s) (1) - DISTRICT 7 "W-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: ALBERT W. DAVIES. INC. DATE June 12. 1991 JOB: CAMPUS RELIEF SEWER, BETWEEN VON KARMAN AVENUE AND JAMBOREE BOULEVARD, CONTRACT NO. 7-13 Item 3 - BONUS PAYMENT The contract specified 150 days for contract completion including 5 calendar days for inclement weather, and liquidated damages of $500.00 per day for each day of delay past the 150 days or a bonus payment of $500.00 per day for each day of completion prior to August 4, 1991. Revised Final Actual Bonus Completion Date Completion Date Days Bonus/Day Bonus - August 4, 1991 April 24, 1991 102 $500.00 $ 51,000.00 ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 51,000.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 54,355.63 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 10 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 10 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date February 26, 1991 Original Contract Time 150 Calendar Days Original Completion Date July 25, 1991 Time Extension this C.O. 10 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 10 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 160 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date August 4, 1991 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 481,616.00 �..� Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 54,355.63 Amended Contract Price $ 535,971.63 "W-2" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(s) (1) - DISTRICT 7 ^W-2^ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: ALBERT W. DAVIES. INC. DATE June 12. 1991 JOB: CAMPUS RELIEF SEWER BETWEEN VON KARMAN AVENUE AND JAMBOREE BOULEVARD, CONTRACT NO. 7-13 Board Authorization Date: June 12, 1991 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED BY: RECOMMENDED BY: �� � '- z - y- yea- Engineer Date Construction Manager Date APPRO BY:: AP OVEO A/\S/S TOO FORM: b-ir-ector of Cngineering Date Gen al Counsel Date ALBERT W. DAVIES, INC.. ACCEPTED BY: L Contractor Date "W-3" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(s) (1) - DISTRICT 7 "W-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. N0. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: ALBERT W. DAVIES, INC. DATE June 12 1991 JOB: CAMPUS RELIEF SEWER. BETWEEN VON KARMAN AVENUE AND JAMBOREE BOULEVARD, CONTRACT NO. 7-13 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $( 696.10) In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES ADD: Change in Item Quantity No. Unit Description From To Difference 1 LF . 21-inch VCP 2,729.00 2,730.30 1.3@ $137.00 = $ 178.10 3 VF 60-inch ID MH 57.00 58.10 1.1@ 494.00 = 543.40 5 VF 60-inch ID MH 16.00 16.60 0.6@ 440.00 = 264.00 6 VF 60-inch ID MH 9.00 9.20 0.2@ 782.00 = 156.40 SUBTOTAL $ 1,141.90 DEDUCT: Change in Item Ouantity No. Unit Description From To Difference 7 EA Concrete Utility Beam 3.0 2.0 1.0@ $919.00 = $( 919.00) 8 EA Concrete Support Wells 3.0 2.0 1.0@ 919.00 = ( 919.00) SUBTOTAL ( 1,838.00) TOTAL $( 696.10) TOTAL DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $( 696.10) .— TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days "X-1" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(s) (2) - DISTRICT 7 "X-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: ALBERT W. DAVIES, INC. DATE June 12, 1991 JOB: CAMPUS RELIEF SEWER. BETWEEN VON KARMAN AVENUE AND JAMBOREE BOULEVARD, CONTRACT NO. 7-13 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Ordcer, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date February 26, 1991 Original Contract Time 150 Calendar Days Original Completion Date July 25, 1991 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 10 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 160 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date August 4, 1991 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date August 4, 1991 Original Contract Price $ 481,616.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 54 355.63 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ ( 696.10) Amended Contract Price $ 535,275.53 "X-2" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(S) (2) - DISTRICT 7 "X-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: ALBERT W. DAVIES. INC. DATE June 12, 1991 JOB: CAMPUS RELIEF SEWER, BETWEEN VON KARMAN AVENUE AND JAMBOREE BOULEVARD, CONTRACT NO. 7-13 Board Authorization Date: June 12, 1991 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED BY: RECOMMENDED BY: Eq9ineer Date nstruction Manager Date APPR VE BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: rS,-f-.fz QAI= it ctor of Engineering Date Genera Counsel Date ALBERT W. DAVIES, INC. ACCEPTED BY: Contractor�7 Date 11X-3" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(s)(2) - DISTRICT 7 11X-3" RESOLUTION NO. 91-89-7 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 7-13 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CAMPUS RELIEF SEWER, BETWEEN VON KARMAN AVENUE AND JAMBOREE BOULEVARD, CONTRACT NO. 7-13, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT k k k k f f k f f k f f f k f f The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Albert W. Davies, Inc. , has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Campus Relief Sewer, between Von Karmen Avenue and Jamboree Boulevard, Contract No. 7-13, on April 24, 1991; and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Director of Engineering has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Campus Relief Sewer, between Von Karmen Avenue and Jamboree Boulevard, Contract No. 7-13, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated February 26, 1991; and, Section 4. That the Districts' Director of Engineering is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Albert W. Davies, Inc. setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Campus Relief Sewer, between Von Kamoan Avenue and Jamboree Boulevard, Contract No. 7-13, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel ; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 7 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 12, 1991. "Y" AGENDA ITEM N0, 9(s) (3) - DISTRICT 7 "Y" RESOLUTION NO. 91-90-7 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS FOR RELOCATION OF DISTRICT B-INCH VCP SEWER SIPHON IN CONJUNCTION WITH OCFCD IMPROVEMENTS TO EL MODENA-IRVINE rH ANNEL A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS TO FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FOR RELOCATION OF DISTRICT 8-INCH VCP SEWER SIPHON IN CONJUNCTION WITH OCFCD IMPROVEMENTS TO THE EL MODENA-IRVINE CHANNEL BETWEEN BROWNING AVENUE AND RED HILL AVENUE IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS, the Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) proposes to reconstruct the El Modena-Irvine Channel from Browning Avenue to Red Hill Avenue in the City of Tustin; and, WHEREAS, the District operates an 8-inch VCP sewer siphon crossing OCFCO's right-of-way which is in conflict with OCFCD's proposed improvements to the El Modena-Irvine Channel ; and, WHEREAS, District acquired an easement from OCFCD for said sewer siphon on � January 23, 1964 which requires the District to relocate its facilities at District expense upon written notice by OCFCD, which said notice was received on January 29, 1991; and, WHEREAS, public inconvenience can be minimized and a cost savings can be realized by the District and OCFCD by relocation of the District's 8-inch VCP sewer siphon by the OCFCD in conjunction with their improvements to the E1 Modena-Irvine Channel . NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Agreement dated June 12, 1991, by and between "Z-1" AGENDA ITEM NO . 9(t) - DISTRICT 7 "Z-1" County Sanitation District No. 7 and the Orange County Flood Control District, providing for relocation of the District's 8-inch VCP sewer siphon by OCFCD in conjunction with OCFCD improvements to El Modena-Irvine Channel between Browning Avenue and Red Hill Avenue, in the City of Tustin, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That District No. 7 shall pay for the actual cost of said relocation plus 10% for inspection and administration, and shall deposit the sum of $40,000.00 (estimated cost) with County's Environmental Management Agency, in accordance with the terms and conditions of said agreement; and, Section 3. That the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 12, 1991. "Z-2" AGENDA ITEM NO. 9(t) - DISTRICT 7 "Z-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .1 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA May 14, 1991 VIA FAX 108A4 ELLIS AVENUE vo.eOX 0127 MOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92729 8127 I71..362-2tl1 M E M O R A N D U M TO: A. B. Catlin, Joint Chairman RE: Secondary Treatment for Water Reclamation Summary The Districts presently provide advanced primary treatment to all of the wastewater flaws plus secondary treatment to one-half of the flows. This wastewater management program has demonstrated that it protects the marine ecosystem and the beneficial uses of the ocean off Orange County's coast, and also allows for water reclamation. The question of the Districts increasing the amount of secondary treatment and marketing the water for reclamation has been posed. The Districts' 30-year wastewater management action plan "2020 VISION" , adopted by the Boards of Directors in 1989, provides for incremental additions of secondary treatment that can be used for expanded water reclamation. Discussion The Districts have proposed to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and California State Water Resources Control Board, renewal of our existing NPDES 301(h) treated wastewater ocean discharge permit based on our existing program of advanced primary treatment to all of our flows plus secondary treatment to one-half of the flows. This decision was made only after extensive scientific and environmental studies conducted by a team of both staff and independent consulting experts demonstrated that our program protects the marine ecosystem and the beneficial uses of the ocean off Orange County' s coastline, at a savings of $1.5 billion under what full secondary treatment would cost. A major programmatic element of "2020 VISION" is to increase current water reclamation capability from the existing level of around 8 million gallons per day (mgd) to about 60 mgd by building up to three new upstream water recycling plants, if the market exists. However, the demand is not unlimited. Our current volume of secondary treated water is 141 mgd and will increase to over 200 mgd by the year 2020. Thus, additional secondary treatment for water reclamation should only be considered if a market for the recycled water is forthcoming. The Districts' "2020 VISION" master plan is, by design, flexible so as to allow the Districts to incrementally add secondary treatment and reclamation facilities if there is a demand for more recycled water and the cost-benefit considerations prove to be f arable. yn S venter e al M ger JWS:sc A RESOLUTION OF THE ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES OPPOSING LEGISLATION ESTABLISHING COSTLY AND UNNECESSARY REQUIREMENTS FOR ..� OCEAN DISCHARGE OF TREATED WASTEWATER WHEREAS, legislative proposals have been introduced from time to time in the California Legislature pertaining to the level of treatment for ocean discharge of treated wastewater; and such proposed legislation may be introduced in the future; and, WHEREAS, such legislative proposals would generally preclude the discharge of less than full secondary treated wastewater to marine waters as allowed by Section 301(h) of the Federal Clean Water Act, and, WHEREAS, such legislative mandates pertaining to the level of wastewater treatment would cost the taxpayers of Orange County $1.5 billion, with no discernible environmental improvement to the marine ecosystem; and, WHEREAS, Proposition 128 which included similar provisions, was resoundingly defeated by the electorate in November, 1990; and, WHEREAS, Section 301(h) of the Federal Clean Water Act was enacted by the U.S. Congress because of a recognition of the wastefulness of requiring full secondary treatment for certain marine discharges, but requires removal of toxic materials to attain secondary equivalency to fully protect the beneficial uses of marine waters; and, WHEREAS, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, which provide wastewater management services to the overwhelming majority of the citizens within the member cities of the Orange County Division, League of California Cities; Has engaged experts and conducted comprehensive environmental , public health, scientific and engineering studies that have concluded that a high quality but less than full secondary treated water protects the marine ecosystem and the beneficial uses of the ocean; and, Has demonstrated that its program of aggressive toxics source control coupled with partial secondary treatment more than adequately protects the ocean waters. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Orange County Division, League of California Cities, does hereby take a position in opposition to the imposition of legislative requirements that are inconsistent with the provisions of Section 301(h) of the Federal Clean Water Act. PASSED AND ADOPTED, THIS THIRTEENTH DAY OF JUNE 1991. RONALD BATES RHONDA MCCUNE President Chair, Resolutions Committee Mayor Pro Tern Councilmember City of LOS ALAMITOS City of BUENA PARK WILLIAM E. H D E Executive Director REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN JUNE 12, 1991 �✓1 ) STRINGFELLOW ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENT ON PROPOSAL TO APPOINT DISTRICT BOARD MEMBER TO STRINGFELLOW ADVISORY COMMITTEE (SEE ENCLOSED LAVENDER COPY OF LETTER INCLUDED IN BOARD MEMBERS' FOLDERS) . 2) ADDITIONAL SECONDARY TREATMENT FOR WATER RECLAMATION COMMENT ON QUESTION POSED TO YOU BY DIRECTOR(S) RE ADDITIONAL SECONDARY TREATMENT FOR WATER RECLAMATION (SEE ENCLOSED GRAY COPY OF MEMORANDUM INCLUDED IN DIRECTORS' MEETING FOLDERS) . 3) LEAGUE OF CITIES PROPOSED RESOLUTION RE FULL SECONDARY TREATMENT COMMENT ON PROPOSED LEAGUE OF CITIES RESOLUTION OPPOSING LEGISLATION ESTABLISHING COSTLY AND UNNECESSARY '---'REQUIREMENTS FOR OCEAN DISCHARGE OF TREATED WASTEWATER (PINK COPY OF RESOLUTION DRAFT INCLUDED IN DIRECTORS' MEETING FOLDER) . THIS WAS PREVIOUSLY DRAFTED AS A RESOLUTION IN OPPOSITION TO AB 854 WHICH WOULD HAVE PRECLUDED OUR 301 (h) WAIVER AS AUTHORIZED BY THE FEDERAL CLEAN WATER ACT . THIS RESOLUTION WAS ORIGINALLY SUBMITTED TO THE LEAGUE LAST MONTH TO SPECIFICALLY OPPOSE AB 854. HOWEVER , SINCE THE SECONDARY TREATMENT LANGUAGE HAS SINCE BEEN REMOVED FROM AB 854, THE RESOLUTION HAS BEEN REVISED TO BE MORE GENERIC SINCE WE EXPECT SIMILAR BILLS TO BE THROWN INTO THE HOPPER IN THE FUTURE. ITEM 4 ON NEXT PAGE - -1- 4) UPCOMING MEETINGS A. BUILDING COMMITTEE - THE BUILDING COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON THURSDAY , JUNE 20TH AT 5:30 P. M . C. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY , JUNE 26TH AT 5:30 P . M. (INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS TO ATTEND:) SALLY ANNE SHERIDAN AND CHARLES E . SYLVIA - OR - (FRED BARRERA) 5) JULY BOARD MEETING A REMINDER THAT THE JULY BOARD MEETING HAS BEEN RESCHEDULED FOR JULY 17TH AT 7:30 P . M . DUE TO THE LEAGUE OF 'ITIES CONFERENCE CONFLICTING WITH THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED `tlOARD MEETING DATE . - END OF REPORT - -2- MEETING DATE .tune 12, 1991 TIME 7:30 P.M. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7, 11 , 13 S 14 DISTRICT , JOINT BOARDS AMFTL=D CORF (R CHAMMIOM...DRISBF....... 40,. (BEYER) ....................BARAIM .....N � - (EDGAR) ........PUCKETT...... Mamas)..........._.......BBC .........�G (SEVER).........BMREM ..... _/-- _ (AGE) ......................BOWMAN .....aG L (FERRYMAN.....WAHNER ...... A/ MORBY)....................CAIDN ....... L (ROTM..........STANTON ..... ✓_ ISCORI ....................COLLW ...... DISTRICTS / (MUMMER) .................ODE..........� y_ MWIER) .......POQER ......JL MELBCN.O4................DUMN ...... (SCOTT).........COLLDLS ...... _✓ (PUCWM..................EDOWI ....... (BEYEM.........IMRREM ..... . (HUNTER)...................wPLE........ _ (DENES) ........BELL.......... ✓ (RICE)......................EVANS........7 (NOR BY) ........CA......... _/ (MAHONEY).................ROM........,/ _ (FLORA).........I NOIIY..... . (RORRARLE)................GREEN ....... ✓ L (CULVN) .......MAN .........JL WM UNE)...................ORI FIRM....... ✓_ �. (PARKER) ......TMR'BBR)M....y� IRICKARDSOM..............ORMD#....... (DOWNEY).......NBWION...... (SCHWINO) .................OUML(BON ...� (ORME) ........PMIDD ....... (� (KUMMER) .................HART.........IL IOULLBSOTC ....SCHMAND .....JC (SILVA) .....................KELLY........LG (ROTM..........STANION ..... . ,l (ROM) ....................MANgRY..... ✓ -yD— ODiTIRICT3 ICULVEM...................MAN ......... J— (RK:HAROSOC..............MMIUMAN ....�� (DOTSdO am........SAPIEN .......�� (PARKER)...................N .... (ROBRA)LLE) ....GREEN........J� (SANER) ....................NBBW,K..... � 'L (AOE) ...........BWMWL......JLC (DOWNEY)..................NsWTON......Jr MDRSYT ........DAMN........ (DUNLAP)...................PARNWI ...... t (scorn.........OOILM ......� (HUNTER)...................PICMER ...... V MAN) ..........CULVER.......111TTT✓• MART) .....................KUMMER..... (NELSON.C.) ....DNAAP....... (BOOM....................POMIDUE ....LG (RICE) ..........WARS........ (EOWD....................PULER ..... MA ONEY)......ROM......... (ORMET) ...................PULmO ....... MWUNE) .......GRIFFIN.......�( (PULE)R ...................RNA)ApsON.. A! IRICIWIDBON)...MNiUBNI ....�� (STANTON) .................ROM......... Jd � Jy WNER).........NB.80N.K..... J� (CO:() ......................SANSOIE..... AG P SAUNTER) ....... ER ......�c/y (DOTS ..................SAPIEN ....... AL (ROA)..........STANTON .....✓ (OLUD,.I................sGTMN] ..... .f DEMPSA) .......SVLVM........JC (HAMNOND).................amERiDM! .... O.AS3D)........MNBNF ...... ✓� (ROAR.....................BTANiOJ ..... ,! V PWMICTS (muu)....................SWAN ........ JG (JWPM)...................mm .......'r 10 IKUMMER)......HART ......... (FERf1VMANLNEMKXAFADO) MANNER IcDL)...........sANSOIE ..... . RASILD) ..................SWEIMw (STANTON, ......ROM.......... E O TONiATTERSOR .....WNDNIl ....AL DISTRICTe ISHERRICID .....WANNER ...... ✓ (HART)..........RUMMER..... ✓ (4 ANTON) ......ROTA).........JC _ DISTRICT 7 STAFFonm SYLVEsIER.........Y WOOMM ...J� (PUCKER) ......EDGAR........ ✓ BROINN ............Je ANWAR ....... MEADEI ........WANNER ......L/ _ ANDERSON .........�L 09BR........J� '..M.........BARREM ..... CIAWLdJ ..........Jl O .......... RHpO...... (KUMMER).. A "MOM..... (PU4DO) ........NMMRDBW.. Jew OORMCA .........y MOM ....... ISTANTC. ......ROTH......... . HASENSTAB ........Jl NOWMD...... (HAMIOID) .....SHERIDAN..... . HODGES ...........JC NWT......... KYLE...............Je MWF........ DISTRICT II CINDER............. = .......... NOIILTON. NELSON............� LINDSTROM ... PATTERSOTR......WNCN91..... ✓ NICMOLS ...........J,e LYNO1........ (SILVA)..........EBLY ........J� OOTEN.............y NNW ........� (RO...........STANTON .....�_ REAESOU ..........Jge $TONE......... 5TIIFm ............Je WARN....... DISTRICT 13 AA� WNCEHT ........... YOUNS ....... (HUNTER) .......EHRLE........T wNSOR............ (SEYEM.........BARREN .....5.� ,�RyIAoN¢aT� (SCNIMNM ......CULLE NM ...... R. UAO) . BATE........... (STANTON) ......R011l.........JC—_ —_ lyL e;�'•I,-.�.',�-`_P `I7 DL4TRICT to (AMIFJR ........SWAN......... ✓ CCY RIAAYIOIq .....SHERIDAN..... — (BEYER).........NIRREM ..... J� — IEDDAR) ........PONTIOUs..... JC _ (STANTON) ......ROM......... im91 6/12/91 JOINT MEETING NOTES #6(a) - Report of the Joint Chairman SEE ATTACHED REPORT. At the last League of California Cities meeting I volunteered to ask the League to let the Sanitation Districts represent that membership on there. You have a letter in your file there that will show you that I have passed this through all of the people who are interested and I think it will go through. At a later time I' ll make an appointment to this. I think it will be a big help to the League as we are the ones that are actually involved. If there are any objections to that, let me know, otherwise, I am looking for a volunteer. Applications are on the back table. Please put your resume on the resume so that we can make sure that we have the best representative to the Stringfellow. Chairman Catlin also reported on AB 854, California Marine Sanctuary Act (Big Green). Last month this bill was proposing to put on full secondary treatment for any of the waters that the state had control of. I introduced into the Resolutions Committee a Resolution 7-91. It's before you now to be considered. However, since that time the legislation has been changed. What I am proposing, and I will do that tomorrow at the League meeting of the Resolution Committee, a generic type of a legislation which says that we don't really need to do that. We would like to take a position opposing full secondary treatment so that Resolution will be changed and a new one introduced. I have put in the packet a proposed resolution that 1 will introduce tomorrow and there will be no waiver of the 30-day rule. It will go right through the regular process. He then reported on the upcoming meetings. �... Chairman Catlin polled the Directors to see how many would be attending the League of Cities Conference in Monterey. The Directors decided to reschedule the July board meeting from July 10 to July 17. #6(b) - Report of the General Manager The General Manager referred to a copy of the report, "1990 Annual Report". As one of the conditions of our NPDES discharge permit issued ,jointly by the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the US Environmental Protection Agency, we are required to submit an annual report on our activities to the EPA and the State Board. This is the full 1990 report. It takes four volumes to print it. This year for the first time we tried to summarize the essence of that four-volume report in the document that is before you. The focus which is really in the later half of the booklet is on the results of our five-year monitoring program on the impacts of our wastewater discharge on the ocean. As you know from our discussions in the past, there is negligible if any impact out there. Please look at Page 5 as the essence of the report is summarized on this page. The graph - blue line shows our annual flow and as that has been increased during the same period of time our heavy metal discharge, both heavy metals coming in to our treatment plants, has decreased as a result of our aggressive source control efforts. And, of course, we take additional metals out as part of the treatment process so our total effluent into the ocean has decreased as well. On the bottom of the page in the form of test tubes you'll see how successful the program really has been. The blue indicates the total that we are allowed to discharge by EPA and the Regional Board as part of our permit. The yellow is the actual discharge so you can see we beat the standards In all of these constituents. In fact, in DDT and PCB, we cannot even detect any. If you have any questions, please give us a call . Additional copies are available. The General Manager commented on the impact of the budget deliberations going on in Sacramento. The State Water Resources Control Board is one of many agencies that regulate our activities. Heretofore, they have been essentially funded out of general fund monies by the state. In recent years they did start levying fees. Currently about 10% of their $44 million budget is funded by fees levied against POTWs like ourselves. The governor and the legislature have agreed to kick the State Board totally off the general fund and require that they be fully funded by user fees levied against the dischargers. What that means to us is they are proposing is a $9.25 per thousand gallon/day of volume discharge. What that means to the Sanitation Districts is that our annual fee would go from about $3100 today to $2.5 million. I guess we resigned ourselves the fact that they are going to be off the general fund. What we are trying to do through CASA is argue for some equitability in how they assess that fee. It should be assessed based upon the service if you can call it a service that the State Board provides. The large dischargers don't believe that they are getting that value from their efforts. Question fielded from a Director??? q8 - Warrants: Director Laszlo abstained from voting on Warrants. #11 - Nominations for Joint Chairman: William Mahoney was nominated. Nominations will be open to the July board meeting. A31 - Districts 6, 7 8 14/Right-of-way re Contract No. 14-1-lA: TLW reported that we are all aware of the major project that is being undertaken for the construction of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor and the Board has previously taken action in a couple of regards, one of which is to authorize the filing of eminent domain proceedings to acquire certain portions of right-of-way that we have been unable to successfully negotiate by purchase. Those include specifically a strip of land along Gisler Street that is owned by the Mesa Verde Country Club and a small portion through a parking lot a few blocks away just west of Harbor Boulevard. It's an office building parking lot. Efforts have been made by staff and my office relative with major emphasis being on the Mesa Verde Country Club for the past several months and it appears as though we are not making any acceptable progress in getting it negotiated. We think that the difference in valuation of the land is so far apart that we will not succeed by negotiating. The golf club is asking outrageous sums to us that are nearly three times the value applied to it by our appraiser. Litigation is imminent. My office did prepare the complaints and we held them pending our last ditch effort to settle it. TLW stated in his opinion that it will not settle, at least not short of filing the litigation. There is a CEQA lawsuit challenge that has been filed by the country club and that matter is scheduled for hearing in superior court tomorrow. Unfortunately, I cannot tell you what will happen tomorrow. That may have a lot of bearing on this. But in any event it is our recommendation that because of the complexity of this and the major diversions that the Districts authorize retaining special counsel . It's the same counsel that we are using for the acquisition of the oil interests and royalty interests at Treatment Plant No. 2, and that's the Palmieri law firm. I have reviewed it with them, determined that they would have no conflicts. It is a very large defendant list on the eminent domain because of various small percentage ownerships, etc. They are able to do so. I certainly highly recommend them. They have done a superb job for us to date on the oil interest case and they are recognized as probably one of the best if not the best eminent domain firm in the county. -2- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 3, 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON JUNE 129 1991 PNTnTto* y °a°Pellmn O I GRq 'GE COVti` ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA u ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on June 12, 1991, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance �✓ and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11. 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS s DISTRICT NO. 1: Dan Griset, Chairman x Robert Richardson 7—Charles E. Puckett, Chai nnen pro tam -Richard B. Edgar =Fred B —_Gene Beyer x StantonRoger Stanto _Don R. Roth 7--James A. Nahner _James Ferryman DISTRICT NO. 2: x Iry Pickier, Chairman _Fred Hunter 7—John Collins, Chairman pro tem _George Scott =Fred Barrera _Gene Beyer a Bob Bell _Barry Danes x A.B. "Buck" Catlin _Chris Norby x William D. Mahoney _James H. Flora x Robert H. Main Norman Culver Carrey J. Nelson x Glenn Parker x Arthur G. Newton _Carol Downey =Miguel Pulido _Dan Griset =M ark Schwing John M. Gullixson =Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT MO. 3: x Sal A. Sapien, Chairman _Harry M. Dotson x Peter Green, Chai man pro tem _Earle Robitaille =Walter K. Bowman _Cecilia L. Age =A.B. "Buck" Catlin Chris Norby =John Collins —_George Scott xNor an Culver _Robert H. Main a Burnie Dunlap Carrey J. Nelson x James V. Evans _Margie L. Rice x James H. Flora William D. Mahoney =Don R. Griffin --Rhonda J. McCune x Pat McGuigan _Robert Richardson =Keith A. Nelson _Eva G. Miner =Iry Pickier Fred Hunter =Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth =_Charles Sylvia Alice Jempsa Edna Wilson =Frank Laszlo DISTRICT NO. 5: x Evelyn Hart, Chairman Ruthelyn Plummer x Phil Sansone, Chairman pro tem John C. Cox, Jr. =Don R. Roth —Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 6: x James A. Wahner, Chairman Dick Sherrick =Ruthelyn Plummer, Chai moan pro tem —Evelyn Hart =Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 7: x Richard B. Edgar, Chai man _Charles E. Puckett x James A. Wahner, Chairman pro tem _Nate Reade =Fred Barrera Gene Beyer x John C. Cox, Jr. —_Ruthelyn Plummer x Robert Richardson Miguel Pulitlo =Don R. Roth =Roger Stanton z Sally Anne Sheridan _Barry Hammond DISTRICT NO. 11: x Grace Winchell, Chai man Linda Moulton-Patterson xJack Kelly, Chairman pro tem —Jim Silva =Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 13: a William D. Ehrle, Chairman Fred Hunter =Fred Barrera, Chai man pro tem _—Gene Beyer x John M. Gullixson Mark Schwing x Glenn Parker =Burnie Dunlap =Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chai man _Darryl Miller =Sally Anne Sheridan, Chai man pro tem Barry Hammond =Fred Barrera —Gene Beyer =Leslie A. Pontious —Richard B. Edgar =Don R. Rath _Roger Stanton -2- 06/12/91 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita J. Brown, Board Secretary, Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary , G. Streed, Corinne Clawson, Patti Gorczyka, Gary Hasenstab, Ed Hodges, Penny Kyle, Irwin Haydock, Steve Hovey, Charles Nichols, Bob Ooten, - Adriana Renescu, Lou Sangermano, Jack Vincent, Mark Esquer, John Dettle, Chuck Winsor OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel , Betty Mrgudish, Jamel Demir, Walt Howard, Bill Knopf, Phil Stone, Margie Rice Y f Y Y Y Y Y Y Y k k Y Y ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman reviewed a letter Report of the Joint Chairman he had sent to the State Department of Health Services proposing that the Sanitation Districts appoint one of their Board members to the State's Stringfellow Advisory Commission in lieu of a representative from the California League of Cities. Mr. Catlin reported that he had discussed this with the League, and there appeared to be a consensus that inasmuch as the Orange County cities affected by the Stringfellow program are represented on the Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County; and since the treated Stringfellow wastewater is ultimately disposed of through the Sanitation Districts' system, it might be more appropriate for the Sanitation Districts to appoint a representative to this Commission. The Joint Chairman also reported on a proposed resolution submitted to the League of Cities opposing legislation establishing costly and unnecessary requirements for ocean discharge of treated wastewater. He advised that a resolution had previously been drafted and submitted to the Resolutions Committee of the League of California Cities in opposition to AB 854, the California Coastal Sanctuary Act of 1991. However, that legislation was subsequently revised to eliminate the provision prohibiting treated wastewater below the secondary level after the year 2004. Therefore, a revised draft resolution was prepared to be more generic and oppose all future legislation requiring full secondary treatment. A copy of the new draft resolution was included in the Directors' meeting folders. He noted that this resolution would be introduced the following evening at the League meeting. The Joint Chairman then announced that the Building Committee was scheduled ' to meet on Thursday, June 20th, at 5:30 p.m. Chaff man Catlin also called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, June 26th, at 5:30 p.m., and invited Directors Sally Anne Sheridan and Charles Sylvia to attend and participate in the discussions. -3- 06/12/91 The Joint Chairman reminded Directors that the regular July Board Meeting �✓ had been rescheduled from July loth to July 17th at 7:30 p.m. due to the League of California Cities' Conference in Monterey conflicting with the regularlyscheduled Board Meeting date. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported on the Report of the General Manager Districts' 1990, four-volume Annual Report. He advised that this report is required as one of the conditions of the the Districts' NPDES Permit issued jointly by the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Mr. Sylvester further reported that this was the first year that a summary of the four-volume report had been prepared and noted that a copy was included in the Directors' meeting folders. He reviewed several of the key pages of the Executive Summary with particular attention to Page 5 which shows the results of the Districts' five-year monitoring program relative to the impacts of wastewater discharge on the ocean. The findings indicate that there are negligible, if any, Impacts on the ocean. The General Manager advised that additional copies of the Executive Summary of the 1990 Annual Report were available at the Directors' request. Mr. Sylvester then commented on current budget deliberations in Sacramento relative to funding the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), which is one of the many agencies that regulate the Districts' activities. Heretofore, the SWRCB has been essentially funded out of General Fund monies by the State. In recent years they have started levying fees, and, currently, about 10% of their $44 million budget is funded by fees levied \/ against POTWs like the Districts. He advised that the Governor and the Legislature have agreed to totally remove the SWRCB from the General Fund and require that they be fully funded by user fees levied against the dischargers. Accordingly, a fee has been proposed of $9.25 per 1,000 gallons per day of volume discharged, which would increase the Districts' annual fee from the current amount of $3,100 to $2.5 million. Through the California Association of Sanitation Agencies, dischargers are trying to obtain some equitability in the assessment of the proposed fees by the SWRCB. It is felt that there should be some relationship between the fee charged and the service provided. The larger dischargers don't believe they would receive service equal to the high charges they would be assessed under the proposed schedule. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or _Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 8, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 8, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or Approval of minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 8, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -4- 06/12/91 DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or Approval of minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 8, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 8, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 89 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or pproval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 8, 1991, the Chai man ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 8, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 8, 1991, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. --- ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and individual District Walms That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages °A" and n8" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 5/08/91 5/22/91 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $1,124,105.02 $ 681,471.30 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 510,411.79 4,628,931.50 Joint Working Capital Fund - 215,947.91 440,380.47 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 69260.02 116,890.09 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 195.34 -0- TRICT NO. 2 - 1,826,003.84 30,862.96 STRICT O.7 - 28,851.66 18,131.44 ISTRICT N : 5 - 1,564.82 26,402.63 TRb73'T10. 6- - 133.79 686.97 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 304,301.22 31,427.72 I N0. 11 - 30,149.35 6,072.70 [STRICT O. - 35.99 -0- D STRIA NO.14 - 1,337,418.25 9,925.37 ' DD TR15 & 6 JOINT - 1,756.59 351.65 DISTRICTS NO J INT - 2,352.13 -0- DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 5 075.97 2 054.91 5,994,5 .7 Director Frank Laszlo requested that his abstention from voting be made a matter of record. -5- 06/12/91 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase of Thirteen 1 Each Four-Wheel Electric ar o That the bid tabulation and Carriers, Specification NO. A-1 recommendation re award of Purchase to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing company of Thirteen (13) Each Four-Wheel Electric Cargo Carriers, Specification No. A-152, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company for a total amount not to exceed $54,600.00 plus sales tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Award ng Purchase of ve Each Four-Wheel Electric ersonne That the bid tabulation and Carriers, pec f ca ion No. A-15 , recommendation re award of Purchase to Taylor Dunn Manufacturing of Five (5) Each Four-Wheel Electric Company Personnel Carriers, Specification No. A-153, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company for a total amount not to exceed $18,000.00 plus sales tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase of One 1 Combinat on i h Pressure Water and That the bid .tabulation and vacuum Sewer Meanin Truck, recommendation re Purchase of One (1) S ecification No. 16 Haa er Combination High Pressure Water and qu pment Company Vacuum Sewer Cleaning Truck, Specification No. A-154, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the bid of Sancon Engineering, Inc. be, and is hereby, rejected as not meeting the specifications; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is he rebY awarded to Weaker Equipment Company for a total amount not to exceed $232,610.00 plus sales tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizin staff o issue a urchase order to General ceanics That staff be, and is hereby, Inc. for urc ase of One Rosette authorized to issue a purchase order Multi-Bottle Water am ler to General Oceanics, Inc. in an Specifica ion No. E- amount not to exceed $25,027.00, plus freight and sales tax, for purchase of One Rosette Multi-Bottle Water Sampler (Specification No. E-200). ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Mange r er o. to e As and specifications for That Change Order No. 6 to the plans Job No. J-17 and specifications for Central Laboratory, Jab No. J-17, authorizing an addition of $34,319.00 to the contract with J.R. Roberts Corporation for five items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. -6- 06/12/91 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: 1 ADDrovinq Change Order No. I to the �..✓ tans and speciticationS for That Change Order No. 1 to the plans Job NO. J-19-1 and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, authorizing an addition of $11,436.00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation for one item of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Chan a Order No. 11 to he gians ana speciTicationS for That Change Order No. 11 to the plans Job NO. PI- -1 and specifications for Gas Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. 01-34-1, authorizing an addition of $14,968.00 to the contract with Ziebarth 8 Alper for five items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re NPDES Ocean Monitor n Program required y Receive, file and a rove Staff Moved, seconded and duly carried: Re ort and Recommendation for NPDE Ocean Monitorin ro ram ear even That the Staff Report and 1-91 and elec on ommittee Recommendation for NPDES Ocean Certification reAmendmentNo.�to Monitoring Program Year Seven PA reef wit 58 1 re (1991-92) and Selection Committee pec fica on o. -032 Certification of the negotiated fee for Amendment No. 8 to Agreement with Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall , Specification No. S-032, be, and are hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. A rovin Amendment No. 8 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: A reement w I re Specification NO. That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 91-80, approving Amendment No. 8 to the Agreement with SAIC for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-Inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. S-032, extending the contract from July 1, 1991 to June 30, 1992, for an amount not to exceed $1,856,923.00 for Year Seven of said contract. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approvin Professional Serg ces A reemen with Bush & ASSptia es That the Selection Committee Inc. for urge n ervices for certification of the final negotiated Various ollection ys em and fee relative to the Professional Treatment Plant Pro, egcts, Services Agreement with Bush 8 pecl 3 16n o. - 51 Associates, Inc. for Surveying Services for Various Collection System and Treatment Plant Projects, Specification No. S-051, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, 7 06/12/91 FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 91-81, approving said agreement with Bush 8 Associates, Inc. for said services on an hourly-rate basis for labor including overhead, direct expenses and profit, plus supplies and materials, at cost, for a total amount not to exceed $75,000.00 for a one-year period beginning June 12, 1991. with provision for up to two one-year extensions. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Professions Services A reement with L11TtorG A. rorkert, That the Selection Committee Civil Engineer for burveying certification of the final negotiated ervices for Various Collection fee relative to the Professional S stem antl Treatmen Plant Services Agreement with Clifford P roJects, pec;fication No. - 51 A. Forkert, Civil Engineer, for Surveying Services for Various Collection System and Treatment Plant Projects, Specification No. S-051, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 91-82, approving said agreement with Clifford A. Forkert, Civil Engineer, for said services on an hourly-rate basis for labor including overhead, direct expenses and profit, plus supplies and materials, at cost, for a total amount not to exceed $75,000.00 for a one-year period beginning June 12, 1991, with provision for up to two one-year extensions. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approvin Professional Services A reement With DGA Consultants. That the Selection Committee Inc. for burveyin ervices for certification of the final negotiated various collection 5ystem and fee relative to the Professional Treatment Plant Prol acts, Services Agreement with DGA Spec f cation No. S- 51 Consultants, Inc. for Surveying Services for Various Collection System and Treatment Plant Projects, Specification No. S-051, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 91-83, approving said agreement with DGA Consultants, Inc. for said services on an hourly-rate basis for labor including overhead, direct expenses and profit, plus supplies and materials, at cost, for a total amount not to exceed $50,000.00 for a one-year period beginning June 12, 1991, with provision for up to two one-year extensions. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin rofess ono Services A reement with John Uarollo That the Selection Committee Engineers tor design, constructs an certification of the final negotiated su ort services and re oration of lee relative to the Professional operat on an maintenance manuals Services Agreement with John Carollo for Job Nos. P1-, and F -4J Engineers for design, construction support services and preparation of operation and maintenance manuals for Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, -8- 06/12/91 FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 91-84, approving said agreement with John Carollo Engineers for said , services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $1,914,805.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made _ a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: R Five file and en claim of ent Truong That the Claim of Vincent Truong dated May 8, 1991, for property damages in an estimated amount of $1,300.00 and for medical costs in an undetermined amount, allegedly caused by an automobile accident involving a District vehicle, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the Districts' General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Genera Manager to employ a Source uontroi Manager at That the General Manager be, and is a salary above the mid-point of the hereby, authorized to employ a Source current range Control Manager at a salary above the mid-point of the salary range (currently $4,766 to $6,196 per month) for this position classification to head the Source Control Division in the Districts' Technical Services Department. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizin the eneral Mana er to desi pate members of a Boar s That the General Manager be, and is and or staff to attend and art c - hereby, authorized to designate ate in meetin s, earin s members of the Boards and/or staff to conferences, Tacill ty inspections attend and participate in various and other functions training programs, meetings, hearings, conferences, facility inspections and other functions which, in his opinion, will be of value to the Districts or affect the Districts' interests, including, but not limited to, those conducted by organizations providing specific training, state and federal legislative and regulatory bodies and the California Association of Sanitation Agencies, California Water Pollution Control Association, Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, and the Water Pollution Control Federation; and, ' FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for travel , meals, lodging and incidental expenses be, and is hereby, authorized in accordance with existing Districts' policies and the approved annual budget for 1991-92. -9- 06/12/91 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Annual nomination for Chairman of t e Joint Administrative The General Counsel briefly reviewed Organization the provisions of the Districts' Rules of Procedure relating to nomination and election of the Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman. This being the annual meeting fixed by the Boards at which nominations are to be made for the office of Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization, the Secretary then declared the nominations open. Director William D. Mahoney was nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. It was pointed out that nominations would remain open until the regular July Board meeting. The Secretary then reported that the election would be held at said July meeting in accordance with the Boards' Rules of Procedures for the Conduct of Business of the Districts. Nominations and election of a Vice Joint Chairman will also be held at the regular July meeting. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and a rove staff ummary Financial Report for nine- That the staff Summary Financial month period ending March 31, 1991 Report for nine-month period ending March 31, 1991, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written re ort of the Executive Committee That the written report of the joint and Fiscal Policy uommittee meeting of the Executive Committee and the Fiscal Policy Committee held on May 22, 1991, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Report of the Executive Committee and Fiscal That the report and recommendations of Policy Committee re 1991-92 the Executive Committee and Fiscal personnel requirements and join Policy Committee re 1991-92 personnel works budgets requirements and joint works operating and construction budgets, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving 1991-92 personnel - requirements and amending That the 1991-92 personnel Classification and Compensation requirements be, and are hereby, Resolution No. 79-20, as amended approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 91-86, amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, re 1991-92 personnel requirements. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -10- 06/12/91 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried by A rov n t e 1 1- 2 Joint the following roll call vote: l� Operat ng Budge AYES: Fred Barrera, Bob Bell , Walter K. Bowman, A. B. "Buck" Catlin, John Collins, John C. Cox, Jr., Norman E. Culver, Richard B. Edgar, James V. Evans, James H. Flora, Peter Green, Don R. Griffin, John M. Gullixson, Evelyn Hart, Jack Kelly, Frank Laszlo, William D. Mahoney, Robert H. Main, Pat McGuigan, Keith A. Nelson, Arthur G. Newton, Glenn Parker, Iry Pickler, Ruthelyn Plummer, Leslie A. Pontious, Charles E. Puckett, Robert Richardson, Don R. Roth, Phil Sansone, Sal A. Sapien, Mark Schwing, Sally Anne Sheridan, Roger R. Stanton, Peer A. Swan, Charles E. Sylvia, James A. Wahner, Grace H. Winchell NOES: None ABSENT: Burnie Dunlap, William D. Ehrle, Miguel Pulido That the proposed Joint Operating Budget Funds of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 for the 1991-92 fiscal year, be, and are hereby, approved and adopted as follows: Fund Total Amount Joint Operating/Working Capital $53,131,000 Workers' Compensation Self-Insured 257,000 Self-Funded Health Plan Trust 2,177,000 Public Liability Self-Insured 336,000 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried by A rov in th 1991- Capital the following roll call vote: Outlay evolye ng Fund Budget AYES: Fred Barrera, Bob Bell , Walter K. Bowman, A. B. "Buck" Catlin, John Collins, John C. Cox, Jr. , Norman E. Culver, Richard B. Edgar, James V. Evans, James H. Flora, Peter Green, Don R. Griffin, John M. Gullixson, Evelyn Hart, Jack Kelly, Frank Laszlo, William D. Mahoney, Robert H. Main, Pat McGuigan, Keith A. Nelson, Arthur G. Newton, Glenn Parker, Iry Pickler, Ruthelyn Plummer, Leslie A. Pontious, Charles E. Puckett, Robert Richardson, Don R. Roth, Phil Sansone, Sal A. Sapien, Mark Schwing, Sally Anne Sheridan, Roger R. Stanton, Peer A. Swan, Charles E. Sylvia, James A. Wahner, Grace H. Winchell NOES: None ' ABSENT: Burnie Dunlap, William D. Ehrle, Miguel Pulido That the proposed 1991-92 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget (CORF Joint Works Construction) of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, be, and is hereby, approved and adopted in the total amount of $114,120,000.00. -11- 06/12/91 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: V.n� Authorizin the Fisca o c omm tree o eva uate ro osals That the Fiscal Policy Committee be, an o ace xcess workers' and is hereby, authorized and directed om ensa on nsurance coverage to evaluate proposals obtained by the effective juiy 1, lug, Districts' insurance broker and to place Excess Workers' Compensation Insurance coverage effective July 1, 1991; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said action shall be submitted to the Joint Boards for ratification or revision at the regular meeting on July 17, 1991. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin n rind le, the Minicom uter Hardware stem and That the Minicomputer Hardware System Network master Plan and Network Master Plan, be, and is hereby, approved, in principle. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Aut or zin s aff o issue a urchase order to i ital tguipment That staff be, and is hereby, orporation authorized to issue a purchase order to Digital Equipment Corporation, in an amount not to exceed $567,000 plus tax relative to implementation of the first phase of the Minicomputer Hardware System and Network Master Plan, for purchase of a VAX 4000, Model 300, dual-host cluster computer system with fiber optic Ethernet Network. dry ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to vu Fisons That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to VG Fisons, in an amount not to exceed $249,600 plus tax, for purchase of Laboratory Information Management System software to manage the large volumes of data handled by the laboratory and help comply with applicable regulatory requirements. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Memorandum of Understan din' between SA PA an t e That the Memorandum of Understanding Districts overni ng uali yCon ro between Santa Ana Watershed Project of Wastewaters Discharged to the Authority (SAWPA) and the Districts Santa Ana Re tonal Interce for re Governing Quality Control of EPA's pre t reatmen requirements Wastewaters Discharged to the Santa Ana Regional Interceptor with regard to EPA's pretreatment requirements for applicable dischargers within the SAWPA ,jurisdiction, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive file and a rove written re or of he Conservat on ec cla That the written report of the and Reuse Committee Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee's meeting on May 30, 1991, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. -12- 06/12/91 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve Staff Report re acquisition of KancFo-reT That the Staff Report dated May 23, _ o property ana oeciarinQe s to 1991 relative to acquisition of not to be a viable wastewater Rancho del Rio property from the residuals management option County of Orange for use as a wastewater residuals composting site, ' be, and 1s hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors do hereby declare that the site , is not a viable wastewater residuals management option, and that the staff be directed not to pursue acquisition of the site. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amen ng oar au or zation o r 1 re tu eas i That the Board action of April 8, sdies er a n ng o n wa er 19B7 re feasibility studies recce on projects with UL Dlo pertaining to joint water reclamation include Joint waterrec cl I ng projects with the Orange County Water projects w 0 Web a�f i District (OCWD), be, and is hereby, agencies amended to authorize participation with OCWD and other appropriate public and private water and wastewater agencies relative to the feasibility of joint water recycling projects, and increasing the total authorized amount from $100,000 to $250.000 for the Sanitation Districts' share of said studies. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: AuthorizingChange Order No. 1 to Purchase uraer No. bujvD to That change Order No. 1 to Purchase Macbonald-Stevens tnqineers nc. Order No. 50395 to MacDonald-Stevens re Lrescent uasin reasloitity EUU Engineers, Inc. Increasing the maximum authorized amount from $25,000.00 to $28,000.00 for engineering services pertaining to the Crescent - Basin Feasibility Study, be, and is hereby, authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the irec or of Finance o certif claims and forward to That the Director of Finance be, and oun Y Auditor for paymenF is hereby, authorized to certify claims and forward to the Orange County auditor for immediate payment for expenditures Incurred after June 30, 1991, and that he declare that such certification shall comply with the provisions of Resolution No. 76-10 pertaining to procedures for payment of claims against the Districts until the 1991-92 budgets are adopted by the respective Districts. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Convene in closed sess on ursuan To--Co-v-e-rn-m-e-nF-Eo-Ue--Te-ctions 54956.9 The Boards convened in closed session and 54957.6 at 7:53 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9 and 54957.6. ALL DISTRICTS At 8:04 p.m. the Boards reconvened in - Reconvene in requ ar sess on regular session. ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel reported that the Actions re claims and ending Boards of Directors, in the course of t a on entitled overnmen the closed session held pursuant to e al. v. Montrose unemicai Government code Section 54956.9, Corporation, at al. reviewed the claims and pending litigation entitled U.S. Government et al. v. Montrose Chemical Car oration et al. He further reported - he oar s au or ze he de ense and n emn fication of the Los Alamitos County Water District and the Yorba Linda Water District 1n connection with said litigation, subject to the same terms and conditions as all other �a✓ member agencies. -13- O6/12/91 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin MOus w h En ineerin and onfidential Employee Units That Memoranda of Understanding with the Engineering Employee Unit and the Confidential Employee Unit, for a three-year period, be, and are hereby, approved for the period November 30, 1990 through November 25, 1993, in accordance with the action taken by the Boards in closed session on June 12, 1991. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 7 - 0, That the Boards of Directorshereby as amended, and Terms and adopt Resolution No. 91-91, amending Condi ons of Em to ent Resolution Classification and Compensation No. 7 - 1 as amen a re c an es Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, and In salaries and benetlts for Terms and Conditions of Employment Engineering and Confidential Resolution No. 79-21, as amended, Employee Units incorporating changes in salaries and benefits for Districts' Engineering Employee Unit and the Confidential Employee Unit, effective as provided in the Memoranda of Understanding with said units. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., July 17, 1991. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:05 p.m. , June 12, 1991. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the Tans and specifications for That Change Order No. 1 to the plans - contract Nos. 2- 6-3, 2-28 and 2-29 and specifications for Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue (including City of Anaheim Street Improvements), Contract No. 2-26-3; Katella .Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street (Ninth Street), Contract No. 2-28; and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29, authorizing an addition of $143,363.00 to the contract with Steve Bubalo Construction Co. for five items of additional work, be, and 1s hereby, approved. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., July 17, 1991. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:05 p.m., June 12, 1991. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin A reNOV with he Westmins er edevelo ment Agency re That the Board of Directors hereby Amendment No. 4 to Westminster adopts Resolution No. 91-87-3, Comnerc al Redevelopment Project approving Agreement with the No. Westminster Redevelopment Agency, electing a tax increment pass-through relative to Amendment No. 4 to Westminster Comnercial Redevelopment Project No. 1, in accordance with District policy and pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33676. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -14- 06/12/91 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: warding Pu rc ase o w0 ach , amiable Fre uenc rive n t1�1 s. That the bid tabulation and bpecitication o. -1 to recommendation re award of Purchase merson n us r a on ro s of Two (2) Each Variable Frequency Drive Units, Specification No. E-199, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Emerson Industrial Controls, for a total amount not to exceed $47,188.00 plus sales tax. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , July 17, 1991. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:05 p.m., June 12, 1991. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizin e e ec on omm ee to R ate endum No. 2 to the That the Selection Committee be, and Profes�ervices A reement is hereby, authorized to negotiate wi The Keith Companies for es7 n Addendum No. 2 to the Professional an —construction services required Services Agreement with The Keith for ContracNOS. 5- 5 and 5-36 Companies for design and construction services required for the South Coast Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-35, and the Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36, to provide for additional design services for a landscaping plan " for Crystal Cove Pump Station, as required by the California Department of Fish and Game. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving agreement with the it of New ort Beach for a coo era ive That the Board of Directors hereby proJec to construct raised medians adopts Resolution No. 91-88-5, along acif c 0asl�t Hi w� rt�ou F approving agreement with the City of corona del Mar n con unc on wl th Newport Beach, relative to a ontra�b-34-J cooperative project to construct raised medians along Pacific Coast Highway through Corona del Mar for the City in conjunction with Districts' Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-34-3, and providing for equal sharing of the cost of said medians. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., July 17, 1991. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:05 p.m. , June 12, 1991. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: A ournment That this meeting of the Board of �— Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., July 17, 1991. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:05 p.m., June 12, 1991. -15- 06/12/91 DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , July 17, 1991. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:05 p.m. , June 12, 1991. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving hange r er o. 1 to the laps and s eciftcat ons for That Change Order No. 1 to the plans contract NO. 7-13 and specifications for Campus Relief Sewer, between Von Karman Avenue and Jamboree Boulevard, Contract No. 7-13, authorizing an addition of $54,355.63 to the contract with Albert W. Davies, Inc., for one item of additional work, payment of bonuses for early completion in accordance with the provisions of the specifications, and granting a time extension of ten calendar days for inclement weather, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin han e r er o. o he ans and s eci cationS Tor That Change Order No. 2 to the plans contract NO. /-IJ and specifications for Campus Relief Sewer, between Van Karman Avenue and Jamboree Boulevard, Contract No. 7-13, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total deduction of $696.10 from the contract with Albert W. Davies, Inc., be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Acce n ontract No. 7-1 as cam0 e e That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 91-89-7, accepting Campus Relief Sewer, between Von Karman Avenue and Jamboree Boulevard, Contract No. 7-13, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: A nryi noA eemen wi th t ane Cou o on rolDs r c r That the Board of Directors hereby relocation of District No-.- 7- sewer adopts Resolution No. 91-90-7, siphon to conjunction with F D approving Agreement with the Orange tm rovements to the E1 Modena- County Flood Control District, Irvine hannel providing for reimbursement of costs to the Flood Control District for the relocation of District's 8-inch VCP sewer siphon, in conjunction with OCFCD improvements to the E1 Modena-Irvine Channel between Browning Avenue and Red Hill Avenue within the City of Tustin, and authorizing payment of a $40,,000.00 deposit for Districts' portion of said work. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 7 d 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: rov n Change Order o. 3 0 e ons and s eciftcat ons for That Change Order No. 1 to the plans contract No. 14-1-2 and specifications for Baker Force Mains, from Main Street Pump Station to Bristol Street, Contract No. 14-1-2, authorizing an addition of $7,600.00 `..� to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Co. , Inc., for additional costs incurred to submit a separate performance bond required by John Wayne Airport Authority, be, and is hereby, approved. -16- 06/12/91 DISTRICTS 6 7 8 14 In enera Counsel to mrT no en ler Wiener Wilhelm 8 waldron as Special ounsel for rignt-ot-way required forCon-tract No. 1 -1-1A Verbal report of General Counsel The Districts' General Counsel reviewed previous actions taken by the Boards to acquire right-of-way needed for construction of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Contract No. 14-1-1A, by eminent domain proceedings. He also advised that there has been little progress made In negotiations with the Mesa Verde Country Club over the past several months to obtain right-Df-way required through a portion of their property, and it appeared litigation was imminent. Mr. Woodruff also noted that the Mesa Verde Country Club had filed a legal challenge to the CEQA proceedings completed by the Districts relative to this project. He advised that the matter was scheduled for hearing the following day. The General Counsel recommended that the Districts retain special legal counsel to proceed with eminent domain proceedings in connection with the Mesa Verde Country Club right-of-way and to assist in acquiring other easements, as required, for construction of Contract No. 14-1-1A. He added that the Mesa Verde Country Club matter may require a jury trial for final adjudication which would also be handled by the special legal counsel . l - Mr. Woodruff recommended that the firm of Palmieri , Tyler, Wiener, V,✓ Wilhelm 8 Waldron be engaged as said special legal counsel inasmuch as they specialize in eminent domain proceedings. He noted that the firm is one of the most capable in the County for handling matters on behalf of public agencies. They are presently retained by the Districts in connection with acquisition of oil interests at Treatment Plant No. 2. Receive and file General Counsel 's Moved, seconded and duly carried: emorandum That the General Counsel 's Memorandum dated May 29, 1991, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Authorizing the General Counsel to Moved, seconded and duly carried: engage the law firm of Pa mier, T ler, iener ilhelm Waldron as That the General Counsel be, and pec al ounsel is hereby, authorized to engage the law firm of Palmieri, Tyler, Wiener, Wilhelm 8 Waldron as Special Counsel for acquisition of necessary right-of-way for the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Contract No. 14-1-1A. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: journment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., July 17, 1991. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:07 p.m. , June 12, 1991. -17- 06/12/91 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., July 17, 1991. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:07 p.m., June 12, 1991. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m. , July 17, 1991. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:07 p.m. , June 12, 1991. Secretary ot tne Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 -18- l MO 9199 JT DIST MORNING CAPITAL PROCESSING OSTE 5/92191 PAGE 1 ` RE^D3T NUM9ER AP93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTi1CTc QF ORANGE [O INTT CLAIMS PAID 05/08/91 POSTING DATE 05/08/91 3__. I34052 A 5 A DEBUNKING 6 TUMBLING $476.96 REFUND USSR PEE OVBRPA7MRIPP ll.� CA WATER AWARFNCSq CAMPAIGN W TER CONSERVATION MATERIALS_____ 114054 RAS SYSTEMS $190.65 INSTRUMENT PARTS 113055 AT 8 T f1.375.59 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICRS 11P4&;Bs —. .._ 114057 AIR PRODUCTS 0 CHEMICAL IN 216.174.00 06M AGREEMENT-DIY. GEN. BTR'f. M.0.8-9-89 114058 AIRBORNE SYSTEMS. INC. $5.000.00 AERIAL MAP - RANCHO DEL RIO COMPOST SITE 114059 AIRWAY SCALE COMPANYf TRUCK SCALE REPAIR 119060 AL NIETO COMPANY 566A5 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAINRNI' 114061 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT f24.79 ASPHALT INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 114063 AMERICAN CABLING 6 COMN $187.91 COMMUNICATION SUPPLIES 114064 AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY $289.00 SUBSCRIPTION AMERICAN114065 ROBED INC UOR PUMP PARTS 114066 /KETEMA 5396.09 MECHANICAL PARTS 114067 CITY OF ANAHEIM 98.939.74 CONSTRUCTION 2-26 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT__ i 114069 ANAHEIM HOTEL 590.6E REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT -- 119070 AMANIIR SAD SHOP INC 1196.75 TOOL REPAIR ANCIENT MARINER RESTAURANT .11M.Ma REFUND USER FEE OVBRPATMBNT m 119072 ANIKTER - DISTRIBUTION $515.86 CABLE X 114073 AND D'ART $310.96 REFUND USER US OVERPAYMENT = NOTICES 6 ADS____ I14075 AQUATIC SIOSYSTEMS. TICto t100.i5 LAB SUPPLIES I 114076 ARATEK SERVICES INC f!•T50.20 UNIFORM RENTALS y i 7 ASSOC, MEDICAL CUING ADMINISTRATOR 114078 AVONGAND PRODUCTS USA. LTD $151.00 MONITORING EQUIPMENT ]a 119079 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 5159.066.02 RESIDUALS ARMORIAL M.0.7-13-06 BACKFLOW TESTING _ H BUILDING SUPPLIES i 114082 BAKER CR T-WHITNEY CO INC 91.352.42 114082 PI ROFT-VHITAND CO SSSl.90 PUBLICATION i 11A00! PI BANOTTI DIAL AND ASSOC $1.213.60 CONBTRUCTION SERVIC88 P1-30_283.J-21 I19004 BEATER DIAGNOSTICS CS INC 3112I3.60 N PPLii� 110035 BEACH-L IN PLAZA f932.33 TRAVEL USER PEN OVERPAYMENT IIAOB6 JAH[S BE"IE t326.78 TRAVEL 6 MEETING EXPENSE 114007 BIG CANYON COUNTRY CLUB 91.055.10 RNFUND 17§IA-FEE-bVERFAYN8N5' 119098 BLUE DIAMOND MATERIALS 9350.82 CONCRETE j 113089 THE BOND BUYER 539.5E TECHNICAL PUBLICATION 11A090 BOOT BARN 599.99 SAFETY SHOES --------- IIR091 :0100 HUR ST SHOPPING CENTER tSI5.93 REFUND USER PER OVERPAYMENT 114892 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV A62.59 INSTRUMENT PART _ 114093 BROWN 6 CALDWELL 53.990.00 LAB SN V-1TES __. 114094 STEVE BUBALO CONSTRUCTION CO $1.787.421.06 CONSTRUCTION 2-26-3,2-28,2-29 I A14095 BUILDER-S EMPORIUM 6199.91 HARDWARE/LUMBER 114096 BUILDING NEWS INC f3V0.9B PUB Z T—-L CA MR 11A097 BUNKE ENGINEERING CO S30.29 REGULATOR PARTS FUND NO 9199 JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PRDCESSING DATE 5102/92 PAGE 2 REPORT NUNBEI 013 CLAIMS PAID 05/08/91 POSTING DATE 05/00/91 WARRANT NO- VENDOR SC3.I9EIDN-._ .--_----._ _._---"- 114099 9US4 AND ASSOCIATES INC $2,509.00 SURVEY'SERVICES RES 88-71 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 114100 BUTLER PAPER COMPANY S4T.05 OFFICE BSPPLIEB 114101 CEN CORPORATION $3.443.19 LAB SUPPLIES 11.1.1 SERVICE AGREEMENT 114103 CS COMPANY $6,959.09 PLUMBING SUPPLIES I14204 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. S421.05 LAB SUPPLIES MECHANICAL PARTS 114106 JOHN R CALAPRICE PHD 112.3$3.62 OCEAN MONITORING M.O. 1-24-90 114107 CALLAVAY CHEMICAL CO $2.517.13 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-8-90 MECHANICAL PARTS _ I14109 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS l290.579.96 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-34,P140,P1-36 114110 CHEVRON USA INC $3.510.50 GREASE & OIL TRAVEL, MEETING & TMINING EXPENSE 114112 CINCO f993.50 REFUND USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT 114113 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT 136.00 FIRE EQUIPMENT SERVICE EARTH UAKE INSURANCE M.O. 3-_13_-91___ 114115 COASTAL COMMUNITIES 5979.85 REFUND USER PER OVERPAYMENT - 114116 COMMERCIAL CENTER DEVELOP. 12.195.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT PUMP PARTS rn X 114118 CONNELL GH PARTS / DIV $79.55 TRUCK PARTS 119119 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL GIST $3.559.47 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 2 TURF10 PUBLICATIONS b0 11412 CDNTROLLO • f1.259.55 ELECTRIC PARTS .-I 119322 COOPER INDUSTRIES INC ....... FITTINGS NUIPMENT RENTAL _ _ 119124 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC .940.00 ELECTRIC BEMMOVAL -- 1 114125 LARRY CVRTI TRUCK 8 ECOIPM 123.149.08 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.7-11-90 N PUBLICATION 114118 DAMES f NOORE $292,1._9.41 CONSULTING TRUCTI N EG.7-2 Y4TNQU KL-FRTPARE3NE 114119 ALBERT Y 04VIE3 INC {292rIS3.0 CONBUILDING REP 7-19 BUILDING REPAIRS 11413 DEL MAR WINDOW COVERINGS f1r297.01 B SER- E OVERPAYMENT'- 119131 DELEC 195.90 VALVE USER FEE 0VBRPAYMBNT — VALVS PARTS 114133 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $451.20 PRINTING 114134 DISCO PRINT COMPANY $121.94 OFFICE SUPPLIES 13A,TA&._14 TOOL REPAIR 114136 DOCTORS HOSPITAL OF SANTA ANA 11.408.75 PUN _339ERTER0VBRPAYNBNT 114137 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC $9.495.00 PLANT MAINTENSNCE & REPAIR 11411R OUNKEL ARDS BACK MOVING 11.1&1'9& SPACE RENTAL J-19_A_____ _ 114139 DUNN EDWARDS CORP 11.645.17 P I SUPPLY.. 214140 OVALS SALES 5212.40 FITTINGS 114141 ERC ENVIRONMENTAL AND S1.500.00 LAB SERVICES 114242 EASTMAN INC $1.923.62 OFFICE SUPPLIES 114143 ENCHANTER INC $7.300.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.8-14-90 ( 1 NO 9199 — JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL ` "OCESIIN6 067E 1102101 PACE 3 REP 041 NUMBE4 AP43 CLAIMS P410 0510919l P73IIN6 DATE 05/85/91 PI10N--____—___. 114144 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE AS50C f1.214.0f LAB SERVICES I. rnR6r rex r6H aln n.n4 REFUND USER FEE OVBRPAYMm 11414E JOHN 9 FALKCNSTEIN PE f3a201.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-4 114147 FEDERAL EAR EIS CO RP f@5.00 AIR FREIGHT 11414R PERRY, PROPANE 114149 FILTER SUPPLY CO f273.73 MECHANICAL PARTS ----- --- 111150 FISCHER 6 PORTER CO $14.045.01 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES FjAAATaNrNO,riREFUIE USER FEE OVERPAYMENT _ _ 11 152 FLO-STSTENS 14,121:63 PUMP PARTS 114353 FLUID HANULINO 815TEN3 f29.36 PUMP PARTS EONBORaqHARDWARE 114156 FRANKLI CO / RHAGSVS TENS f]$950.11 INSTRUMENT PARTS 11415E FRgNKEIN COMPUTER CORP.0 f910•I1 PUBLICATION SUPPLIES PAINT BVPPLIEO 11415E GON,ENERAL SOUND INC .238.00 SAFETY NUPPLI88 - 114159 6ENER AL TELEPHONE CO f2123I.02 REFUND USES SERVICES REFUND USER PEE 0V8RPAYMBNT __ 114I62 6IERLICN-M]TCOELL MOO INC f2.039.62 FOP FART 114162 6l EN HAVEN MOBIL006E fI T4.20 RE = U98R FEE OVERPAYMENT IATEX REFUND USER FEZ OVBRPAYMBNT _ m 114164 60RDON•S INC f2.130.95 OFFICE SUPPLIEe _ >C 114165 6RANO CENTER i44.92 REFUND U96A FEB OVERPAYMENT _ _]6 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES to 214167 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS f2.DOB•80 POWROID CAMERAS/FILM W 11416E DON . 6pCEN 6 ASSOCIATES f171191.50 REFUND USSR FEE ORESVERPAYMENT 88-72 —� REFUND USSR FEE OVERPAYMB_Nl' _ n 114178 HALTOM RECOGNITION INC f193.62 ROM ITIM AWARDS 1 114171 HATCH 6 KIRK INC $6.193.06 ENGINE PARTS Ill TMSN REMOVAL 334173 SODA NEAEL CO f6.551.57 SEWER REPAIRS DIET 2 - - - 114114 NODOSON ELECTRIC fN;7_10 RJU)IO TOWER INSTALLATION — 114175 J.T.n! $l.taf_u TRUER PARTS UMIO _ 11411E J.T MORVATH 6 ASSOC. f2.600.1O CONSTRUCTION 88RVIC6B J=T-�-- 114111 NOUSC OF 6ATTCRlE3 i670.51 ATRIE9 SAFETY SUPPLIES _ 114179 RODNEY HUNT CO 54.913.73 EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT 114180 HUXT INSION BEACH RUBBER STA $50.27 OFFICE SUPPLIES HARDWARE 114182 IBM CORP 11I0457 REFUND USER FEE 0VERPAYf1ER 114183 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL 133,155.91 FERRIC CHLORIDE N.O. 11-14-90 PAVE, JANITORIAL 9UPPLI88 I illn INSIDE WASTE C/O CAP REPOA RT5.Be PUBLICATION 114186 INT•L VN 104 OF OPERgT IN6 C f2.S30.10 SETTLEMENT, CASE 56665E PUBLICATION 11418E J 6 W SCIENTIFIC f4S.B2 LAB SUPPLIES 1 14189 JKL MANUFACTUR INO 02 f96.47 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROC'-SSINS DATE 3102191 P46E 4 REPORT NUNBEA ■P45 CLAIMS P410 05/09/91 POSDS TING DATE )5/011/91 WARRANT Nn_ vry.DnA •+nORT ^rSCt1PT10N—__.__ 114190 WILLIAN H JACKSON $5.99 METING EXPENSE L eoe.. ure.CRN fAN1TARY SURF t180 0. J xA ITORIAL__SNPPL268__ ________ 114192 JAY-S CATERING f371.42 DIRECTORS' HERTING EXPENSE 114193 JT LEE INVESTMENT $163.51 REFUND USE FEE OVERPAYMENT 1L194 JpNN$70KE---SUPEIX •090 04 EmomIt_PSRTS 114195 THE KEITH COMPANIES $375.57 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-35 6 5-34 114196 BELLY SPRINGFIELD TIRE CORP $200.42 REFUND USSR FEE OVERPATHBHT COURT REPORTER SBRV. - MITTRCM_ PL_ATE_NO 114198 KENSINGTON GARDENS MOBILEHOME 92.234.81 REFUND USER PER OVERPAYMENT 114199 KERR GLASS 96.957.14 REFUND USER FeR OVERPAYMENT n Wen rsrs rnpE—Yu ve fyyle;y MARS 114201 KING SEARING INC $1.132.55 MACHINE SUPPLIES 114202 KOHL•S HALLMARK CENTER $1.312.44 OFFICE SUPPLIES CONSTRUCTION 88NVICES_14-1-211-9_.__ 114204 KRAFT FOOD $5.792.58 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 114205 LA LAMPARA MOSILMOME PARK $1.903.47 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 11A1AA . .�n*TE CNCMJ CAL ^r000CTS SLR. 88 CMEMICALS 114207 LAB SUPPORT 112.078.13 TEMPORARY SERVICES 114208 LAN-PLATE TECH 560.30 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 1141.9 I .VTON SOFT UATEA aRa._4y REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT X 114210 LIDO MARINA VILLAGE fl.0N.18 REFUND USER FEES OVERPAIM" = 114211 NILLIAR J LLOYD $62.40 HEATING 6 TRAINING EXPENSE .y ..ea1R I,nn.A nrvn rnov es c_85_ COMPUTER_SOMA" . . UU 214214 COUNTY OF MOTEL AN6ELES f1.220.00 PURCNSE U ERAGREEMENT 11.21. LUCKY 1 MOTEL 6250.06 REFUND USER F88 OVERPAYMENT 11421.16 NPe $197_20 SERVIPHOTOCE 11421E NAC DM CD i197.20 88RVIC8 NER REPAI n 1/1217 MAGNETEC. INC 1115 . JANITORIAL SOPPLIBS 114219 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $19.69 ELECTRIC SUPPLIRB 114220 MATT - CHLOR INC $176.26 PUMP PARTS INSTRUMENT PARTS _ 124222 RESA TECHNOLOGY $93.50 REFUND USER FIVE OVERPAYMENT 114223 CROMPT04 METERRASTER INC $232.35 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 11.114 M11 . 1.t .a....... REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT_ 114225 HICROAGE COMPUTER $2.249.32 COMPUTER SOFTWARS)IIARRRARB 114226 HICROAGE COMPUTER STORES $1.T05.36 COMPUTER SOFTWARE/HARDWARE ...... KLLIPORF AROTn! Wn ElS a.9n_A. LAB SUPPLIES 114228 SERPENTIK AND/ 'f S.471.00 HSCNANICAL PARTS 114229 HISSIOR LINEN SUPPLY $4.502.79 REFUND USER F88 OVERPATMENT .3.23E Mu nrx RnxTltx rnN87Rn[r mx a..f aa_.,1yp-rR CONSTRUCTION 14-1-2 114232 MONT60M ERT LAY OR ATOR IES $1.659.74 LAB CERVIC89 110232 Mnl..ni SUPPLY CO f1. .-M. OFFICE R TELEES PHONE 114234 NABISCLA [EL WLAR MEIYI[F9 — _ p271.71 CELLULAR TBLEPNONB SERVICES 119231 MAB[S[p i18.29 T•77 REFUND USER FEE OVeRPAYABNF---- - 114235 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES INC 92,151.98 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES ( J NO 9199 JT DIET MORNING CAPITAL PiOCESSING DATE 5/02/91 PAGE 5 RE-ORT NUR9Ci 043 CLAIMS PAID 05/09/91 POSTING DATE OB/BB/91 WARRANT NO, wFNDOR AMOUNCi1EIION___.__ 119236 NATIONAL VISUAL SYSTEMS f9.)9B.50 SIGNS 114231 CITY OF NEWPORT REACHWATER USE 114238 O-BRIEN ENERGY SYSTEMS f34.912.78 xIMRrR POWER-GEHER STEP M. I14239 ON SYSTEMS CO f29.939.71 CHLORINE H.0.2-14-90 9 9 L ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 114241 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY C t632.92 GRWR153RERPIW SUPPLIES 114242 ORANGE VALVE E FITTING CO. $623.35 SITTINGS. 4243 S N if R { SPECIALTY GASES 114244 COUNTY 01 ORANGE $2.699.00 A-FROCESSII7G-9ERVICBS - ' ---'-- 114245 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT {5.999.B4 REIMOURBE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE COMPUTER SOFTWARE 114247 FIST $250.15 CNBNICALB �- - 114240 PACIFIC PUBLISHERS $55.99 PUBLICATION PACIFIC114249 A SAFETY SUPPLIES 114250 PACIFIC BELL $694.47 BLBPNONB-SERVICBE 114251 PACIFIC MAZER CONDITIONING C 168.40 - EQUIPMENT RENTAL CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE8 114253 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $2.936.30 --MZPRDNS-SYSTER RODIFICATIORE----" 114254 PAN WEST 51.317.41 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES LEGAL SERVICES - OIL WELL CONDINGRATIOM X 11945E PlRN30N f132.69 OPFLIEB-- -- ----'---"""- Z 11945T PEAT NAME= MAIM E CO f679.90 AUDITING SERVICES 119258 PMARR-PALORAR INC 11,910.71 REFUND USER PER OVERPAYMEMT CO 114259 PIMA SRO SYSTEMS INC $128.733.98 IDUALS"REMOVAL M.0.5=11=EE---"' 114260 POLYPURE INC f16.052.70 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-87 114261 PORTRAIT WORLD INC fI.D46.63 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 114262 POSTMASTER t179.11 I5-OBEA"FEE-OVRRPAfMENf -' -" - 119263 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO 670.58 ELECTRIC PART V F ICE 119465 PRINCESS MOTEL $125.90 --MrUW OUR EN UVZRPAYMERT'---""-"'-" 114266 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. f9.916.99 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION N.O. 9-8-00 114267 RPM ELECTAT MOTORS $399,Sl ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR 114269 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO.. INC 91.521.38 LAS 5UrrLITS­______ 114269 RECYC INC f91.641.1B SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.7-11-90 114276 REMEDY MP $1,573.23 TEMPORARY SERVICES_ 114271 REMOTE METER RESETTING SYST t3•800.00POSTAGE 114272 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO f1.916.92 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 114271 REMOLD INC. fll.3A MECHANICAL PARTS 114974 ROSINH000 MOTEL $276.06 RETOHD-O9EI S7OVERPXTMKPT 114275 ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL 9600.06 OXYGEN ANALYZER TRAINING REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 114270 SAFETY-ALE[N CORP 156.07 PARTS-CLEAEER- 114279 SAMTA ANK EL[CTPIC MOTORS .274.30 ELECTRIC MOTOR PANT 124280 SEA BANK fl3]$165.94 CONSTRUCTION FEW EHTION PINT 16-1-4 114281 SCIENTIFICE SPRAY FINISHERS $369.56 EFICE CTSERMACH TEE-OV6RPATMERI' toast SEA COAST DESIGNS f3S9.36 OFFICE MACHINE FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5162191 PAGE 6 4EPORT NUMBEN 4P43 COUNTY R&HIT&TIOM 1lE?Al2?n OF BRING' COUNTY CLAIMS P4I0 05/09/91 POSTING DATE 05/08/91 WARRANT NO, [SCIIPT I DN_ _ 114282 SEAL BLACK 5132.31 ASPHALT SECURITY SYSTEM PARTS 114294 7/11 MOTEL 6 RV PARK Mtl•63 BEYOND USER F88 OV6RPATFIRNT 1142B3 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $746.2% SAFETY SUPPLIES TOOLS 114287 SLIDE MASTER SIS5.17 PRESENTATION AIDS - - 114280 SMITH-EMERY CO $3.400.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.6-14-89 COMPUTER HARDWARE/8OFTWARE I14290 SONNENSCHEIN MAIN 4 ABSINTH $3.599.25 LEGAL SERVICES - PERSONNEL 114291 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY 5529.JO PERMIT FEES RBEUND USSR IRA 0VERPAYMENT 114293 E0 CALIF COASTAL WATER $7,209.00 OCEAN MONITORING 114294 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO $155,612.77 POWER 11.19% KITUTMERN—Co IL IN DIESEL FUEL 114296 SOUVENIR PHOTO 532.54 FILM PROCESSING 114297 STAMEN i SPASSOFF ►E 52,340.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-34-I,J-25 WELDING SUPPLIES 114299 SPECTRUM-HUMAN RESOURCE STS 531.640.4E CDMPUT99 WA SOFTRE 114300 AT EDNA CONVALESCEVT CENTER 3269.06 REFUND USER FBA OVERPAYMENT .....1 - 141.6E REFUND USER PER OVERPAYMENT m 114302 STAR TOOL t SUPPLY CO 5298.IE TOOLS X 114303 STERLING ART 542.76 ART SUPPLI89 = TRAVEL, MEETING 6 TRAINING EXPENSE r, _.._ CO L14305 SUMMIT STEEL 9445.7E STEAL 114306 SUPER CNEM COMP - 9162.5E PAINT SUPPLI89 � T0O18 y 11430E SYNERGY CIRCUITS INC 541.0E REFUND USER FEE OVBRFATRHNT 1 114309 TAGGIN• VISION MDSILEOME PA 5351.55 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT pY TRUCK PARTS 114311 TELEDYNE ANALYTICAL $343.40 INSTRUMENT— RTS 114312 THERMCO SYSTEMS INC t2.216.68 REFUND USER FES 0VARPAYMCM OCEAN MONITORING 114314 THOPPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY SL271.34 ME ARTS- 114319 GEORGE M. TNURO $101.10 REGISTRATION LAB SUPPLIES /14317 TOWNE ADVERTISERS $0,605.90 PRINTING 114318 JANE TRAM 99.90 MEETING EXPENSE REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 111520 TRAVEL TRAVEL $3.903.30 OA.u— J=90— 114321 IS TRIPP SS35.00 CARPET CLEANING ...... TRUCK t ADTD e37PVLv TMR _ _ .Mn... TRUCK PARTS 114323 JG TUCKER S SON INC $19.799.18 3NSTRUMEWPART3— -- 114324 TUINING LAOORA70RIES OF t4.647.50 SOIL TESTING REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 114326 UNION FOODS 92.251.57 PTiN UsEFP6E-3V6RPAYMeRT 114327 UNOCAL $132.46 UNLEROED GASOLINE < .O NO 9199 JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING 067E 5102191 PAGE 7� REPORT NUMBER AP43 *T CLAIMS PAID 15/99/91 POSTIMS DATE 05/96/91 1lIION__.___ 11432E UNION OIL CO/DSA UNOCAL S923.22 RETUND USER "S OVERPAYMENT SAFETY SUPPLIES 114338 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE t3R2.06 PARCEL SERVICES 214331 Y.F. ENTERPRISES $1.539.90 TRUCK REPAIRS REGISTRA_TI_ON_ 114333 VYR SCIENTIFIC S3.004.49 LAB SUPPLIES 114334 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO 51.915.91 PLUMBING SUPPLIES REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT _ 114336 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS 24.207.53 LAB SUPPLIES 114337 VARNER READINESS PRODUCTS $159.95 EMERGENCY WATER • py eye PLUMBING SUPPLIES_.__ 114339 VERTEX SYSTEMS $3.312.50 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 114340 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 9151.01 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES REFUND USER FEB OVERPAYMENT 114342 CARL WARREN L CO S765.18 - INSURANCE CLAIMS ADNMINISTAATOR 114343 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL $179.35 PUBLICATION HATER SAVINGS PACRAGS__ 110345 WEAVER 6 MOLA $55.3.1 REFUND USER PRE OVERPAYMENT- _ 11131E WEAVER 6 NOLA $200.35 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT fYl REFUND USER FEE OVBRPAYMBM'______.___ 114349 RESTATES CARBON INC 11.711.90 CHEMICALS 2 114349 WEST COAST ANALYTICAL SRV $235.00 LAS SERVICES -SI'a HISSIGNS 11,11,335510 WESTERN STATES CMERICAL SUPPLY $19.519.61 CAUSTIC SODA M.C.b-90 111752 WHIRLPOOL CORP $131.95 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT PUBLICATION I14354 WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES INC 155.27 REFUNO USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 111353 YILLDAN ASSOCIATES 14.522.90 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-9-RI V 5uR9c RERI.R ro9P Aaa.oK.no COPIER LEASES 114350 YELLOW FREIGHT COMPANY TE 552.91 PUMP PARTS 111350 YELLOW FREIONT SYSTEMS tlll.11 FREIGHT REECHO USSR FEE OVBRPAYMBNT I14360 RICH ARD YOUNG PROD 171.32 ELECTRIC FLIES --------------- TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 05/08/91 S5.391.563.70 ------ -- - —-- ---- POND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/02/91 PAGE 8 ER—NP49-- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT$ OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAINS PAID 05/08/91 POSTING DATE 05/08/91 #1 OPER POND $195.34 62 CAP PAC FUND $1,813,289.30 03 OPER FUND $'22,519.12 32.54 P5 OPER FUND $694.32 AS CAP PAC FM $070.50 ♦7 OPER FUND $9,060.19 P7 CAP PAC FUND $295,241.03 011 CAP PAC FOND $29,923.56 P13 OPER FOND $35.99 97,4.19:25 6566 OPER FUND $1,756.59 5667 OPER FUND $2,352.13 m - X JT OPER FUND $1,124,109.02 = CORY $510,412.79 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $215,947.91 -------------- I ..........eves GG F( .0 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/16/91 PAGE I .� REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTYN DISTRICTS OF ORANGECOUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/22/91 POSTING DATE 05/22/91 WARRANT N0, VENDOR A90UN7 114379 ASR ANALYSIS 5511.00 PUMP VIBRATION TEBTINO 113 RP AQA MS COMPANY f216. _.pBEImIT_ _ 114361 ADYANCO CONSTRUCTORS INC fIr231.917.90 90 CONSTRUCTION PI-34-2 t14362 AIR PRODUCTS 6 CHEMICAL IN 116.1iA.00 OAK AGREEMENT-OEY. GEN. BEAT. N.O.0-9-09 j A f 8�____.._._.__INBTRVRfBNR_.PARL___,___, 114384 AMERICAN CABLING 6 COMM S773.70 CABLE/TOOL 1143PS ARE R ICAN FLEET PARTS $99.20 TRUCK PARTS 4396 AM AN MEDIA INC $121.90 _VI08R_RENT4__ _ 114387 ROBCO INC 6/OR AMERICAN SEALS $9,651.65 GASKETS/SEALS _...... "- II9380 AN AMEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $22.007.98 SEWER REPAIRS DIET 2 B 7 SLAKE _DEFBHRCD_COMP_NL�, ___ 114390 ANTNONY•S NECH 6 MACHINE. INC. $579.00 HACKING REPAIRS j 114391 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $2,317.21 NOTICES 6 ADS 114392 ARATEX SERVICESINC ___UNIFORM RENTALS _ j 114393 NICHOLAS ARHONTES 194.90 MECTING. TRAVEL B TRAINING EXPENSE 114394 AR120NA INSTRUMENT SIr3S2.25 INSTRUMENT PART 124395 ASS a CIATEDSTPIA64 114396 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING $1.554.00 FOIL TESTING M.O.0-I1-90 j 114397 ASSOC. ADMINIS. A CONSULTANTS $171.03 MSDICAL CLAIMS ADNINISTRATOR 1T7 .12 __-.__TRUCK ?ARTS —_ X 1144389 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CO $125.62 TRUCK PARTS = 119400 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE f100r703.RR RESIDUALS REMOVAL N.0.7-13-00 3P.20.—_._—__.__..BNGINEERINSr_eHRy3DE8�434 Nj_LL8 _ CU II4902 BANANA BLUE PRINT $3.911.00 BLUEPRINTING M.O.10-10-90 119903 BANN OF AMERICA $1,655.50 BANK CARD CRARGBS BAROTTI AND 43SOC $5,202.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PI-00-2S0. V-35-2 1R7 - 114405 9 BATEMAN $595.00 D8F8RRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 1 119906 ANTHONY BATTER f27.16 MEETING 6 TRAINING EXPENSE �-' 114407 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS78 LA SUPPLIES 119908 WT BILLARD INC $159.45 TRUCK PARTS 119909 BLACK BOX CORP f115.9R ELECTRIC PART 134410 30LSA R401ATOR SERVICE Sisk-a? __ RADIATOR REPAIR 119911 BOOT BARN $212.49 SAFETY SHOES 119912 BOYER ENGINEERING 5505.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES - DBTOUR PLAN 114413 BOYLE ENGINEERINGf rO5 Gr30 ENGINEERING_SERVICES J_17 EC 119914 BRENNER-FIEDLER f ASSDC IN 9102.61 MHANICAL PARTS 119915 9RTNDERSON CORP $2,156.451.00 CONSTRUCTION J-19-2 114416 BROWN 6 CALDVELL $250.00 ___LAB SERVICES _ 114417 BROWN 6 CALDVELL CONSULTING, 152r52R.29 ENGINEERING SERVICES RVB bD-7�—' 119918 CAROLYN A BRUSKIN S194.t5 ' MEETING EXPENSE 114419 C, J. BRUIN $255.00 _ LAS SUPPLIES 11992D BUILDEP.S EMPORIUM $51.05 HARDWARE/LUMBER 119921 BUILDING NEWS INC f170.58 PUBLICATION 114429 BURKEN6 7 __ ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 114423 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES INC $9,755.00 SURVEY BERVIC68 0E-7f 114424 GARY 0 STAKES $2,956.61 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5115191 PRSE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CLAIMS PAID 05/22/91 POSTING DATE 05/22/91 ZSC31111BN 114425 PUTLER PAPER COMPANY 2B.IO2.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES COMhIMIGT;0 BUPPLISS 114427 CS COMPANY $1.755.97 PLUNGING BUPPLI88 114428 CT MEETING PLANNERS. INC. 5693.80 TRAINING REGISTRATION INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 11443 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION INC 51.210.04 TRUCK PARTS 11. 1 CALLAWLAYAY CHEMICAL CO f2.118.76 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.E-8-90 to.... CANTORS, .91 CAMERA REPAIR I14434 CENTURYN SAFETY f1$748.00_ ENGINEERING IERVIC88 5-9-90 1114J4 CENTURY SAF CTT IMST 6 SUPP f..8.3J SAFETY SUPPLIES Jam._ - TRUCR_E RTS_—___—____._ .. 114437 CHROME CRANKSHAFT INC S640.08 MACHINE REPAIRS 114137 CORI NNE CLAYSON f169.7G M86TING fi TRAINING EXPENSE MAP 58RVIC88 _ 114N9 COMPRES. CO. OMC. stsfi.75 POMP PARR 111110 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA fI70.08 COMPRESSOR PARTS CHOTOTSR VICESSERVICES 114 CONNELL PHOTOGRAPHY/ S223.55 PHOTO PARTS 114443 CONSOLE GE PARTS /ELECTRICAL- f214.99 TRUCK PARTS DIST 329.65 ELECTR"CINNIIC SUPPLIES fn 114446 CONTRACTOR-SCON BOOM STORE f229.65 TECHNICAL PNBLIGTION X 111416 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 C S6.05 6.10 TOIL -PARTING t TRUCB_PPRTB o _ fJ 11441E COUNTY VHDLESALE ELECTRIC 3997.2E ELECTRIC PARTS --1 114149 JAMES COVRN f11.30 HiLEAGE EXPENSE OVERTONENGINEERING SERVICES DIST 5 114451 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2250.00 ANNEXATION FEE 7-234 �I 114452 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $456.69 HAZARDOUS WASTE FEES N Il a.•L ___. _ HAZARDOUS WASTE TAX_ _.. 114454 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE $621.31 TRUCK PARTS 114459 DE AMEA CORPORATION 915 O.80 EQUIPMENT RENTAL TRUCK PARTS 111137 Df GCO PRINT CO MPRNY 9215.96 OFFICE SUPPLIES 114458 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC $31.290.23 — -- PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS .27 MBCHANCIAL PARTS_ 114466 OUNV EDWARDS CORP S3.857.29 PAINT SUPPLIES 114461 D•VALS SALES $1J/9.43 FITTINGS HARDWARE 114463 EMA SERVICES INC 3065.48 ENGINEERING SBRVICBS P - , J- - IIN64 EASTMAN INC f1.033.25 - OFFICE BUPPLI88 _ "THINK EARTH' PROGRAM _ 114466 ENGINEERING NEWS RECORD $97.98 PUBLICATION 114467 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC 042.76 LAB SERVICES INSTRUMENT PART _ 114469 MARSHALL FAIRRES St13.89 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 114476 JOHN 9 FALKENSTEIN PE $5.211.09 COITBTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-4 1� 10 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITOL _ PROCESSIN3 DOTE 5/IS/91 FREE 3 ^�- REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY sim,ilTing nitTgirT� OF ORANGE CLAIMS PAID 89/22/91 POSTING DATE 05/22/91 .DESL31LTLON 111171 FARR SALCS 6 SERVICE S8.209.75 FILTERS R FREI_GH_T II4173 FERRELLSAS $37.83 PROPANE 114474 FISCHER 6 PORTER CO 9639.22 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 11,714.91 LAB 4UPPLI88 211176 FLAT R VERTICAL CONCRETE $164.00 CONCRETE CUTTING 111177 FLO-SYSTEMS $1.632.96 PUMP PART PRI P PARTS /I4179 - FORCE MFE CO.. INC - $69.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES - 111180 FORD TRUCK SALVAGE S79.B8 TRUCK PARTS 114482 FOUNTAIN PRISES FAINT f168.27 PAINT SUPPLIES 214403 1NB3 FOX ENTERPRISES f1.925.00 SAFETY ENTCONSMIANTSUPPLIES 99 INSTRTRUCK PENT ____BB 111186 FREDSON RV SUPPLY f$71.16 TRUCK PARTS 11118E AR6C ME FPEYr 371.1E DEFERRED COMP DIBTRIBUTION - VALVE PARTS _ 119198 CITY OF FULL ER TON f56.0090 WATER U38 111189 6A NA HL LUMBER CO . LUMBER/HARDWARE......... HATER CONSERVATION PR ION MATERIALS X 11119 GE COMP UI TELEPHONE SERVICE SS9.60 INSTRTELEPHMENT ONE = 114492 GENERAL TEL EPNOXE CO far 79t.69 TELEPHONE I aim MECHANICAL PAR78 LT1 111494 TYRONE C. 61VAN $32.50 MEETING 6 TRAINING MAKES y .1 1141 60 ROOp•S INC fl.T9..36SUPPLIES SURVEYINGSCRVICES RES 88-72 tz 111197 N9 TYPE 6 GRAPHICS $182.39 PRINTING 11 211498 M.F. SCIENTIFIC f158.69 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES W _ CHEMICALS _ 114500 FRED A HARPER $1.460.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 11,4501 HATCH A KIRK INC 92,957.52 MSCHANICAL PARTS CONTAINER RENTALS 114503 DAVID HEINI 856.00 MEETING 6 TRAINING EXPENSE 114504 HIPORTRONICS 9159.41 INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION TRUCK PARTS _ 114506 HOERBIGER CVS CALF INC SB97.63 MECHANICAL PARTS 111597 HONEYWELL INC S95T.73 CHARTS I4A9A8 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 111569 J.T. HURVATH B AS SAC. $2.590.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, 3-7-1 111SIf HOUSE OF BATTERIES 1141.00 BATTERIES ENGINEERING SERVICES M.O.9-12-90 114512 AS HUGHES CO INC 13.362.14 PAINT SUPPLIES 114523 HUNTER CORPORATION SIS3039.76 CONSTRUCTION 3-19-1 11-R• NATBR U86 _ 11951E HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER SIR S191.68 OFFICE SUPPLIES 114516 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $57.360.59 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.C.6-11-90 FUND NO 9199 JT DIST HORNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/IS/91 PAGE 4 REPORT NUM9ER AP43 iSIR1C2$_OE�AJWGCIOUN*• CLAIMS PAID 05/22/91 POSTING DATE 05/22/91 114517 AIROUEST ENVIRONMENTAL CO. $3.119.75 OFFICE MACHINE 1Ig510 *u^USER LAL TNR EA DED RR ODLIC TS S03S 20 -__CONNECTORS_ _ 114519 INGRAM PAPER 5555.21 OFFICE SUPPLIES 114520 INT•L DIVING SERVICES 19,795.71 OUTFALL INSPECTION SERVICES I3491, TXTIRL'AUDNII—SCNSOA—TICI1 SSY9F7.9S — ---INSTRIP.RHT - ___ . - 114522 IRVINE RANCH HATER DISTRICT $22.41 WATER USE 114523 JLA CREDIT CORP $145.32 MICROFICHE READER LEASE — 114525 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY BUFF $208.10 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 114526 JAYS CATERING SS06.09 DIRECTORS' MEETING REPBNSE 1-144�JEMSSM-1gSTR YNfi.T. CD Rl J09.SS-----------INSTRUKBNT_EUPPLLBS..__ _. 114528 JIM•S SUSPENSION SERVICE 130.00 TRUCK PARTS 114529 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $234.94 ELECTRIC PARTS TODLS ____. .. 114531 MAR PRODUCTS $299.41 HARDWARE 114532 RAS SAFETY PRODUCTS $65.92 SAFETY SHOES 114534 MINT SEARING INC $2.735.25 MACHINE SUPPLIES 33 I14535 MARTIN MORDICM SR 53.064064.0000 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 14-1-2, I-9 IRUCRVMRNT_PARTB X 114538 L S C TIRE SEP YI CE ,039.38 TRUCE PARTS X 11053E LAB SUPPORT f4.0I, 38 TEMPORARY SERVICES ti — ELECTRIC_ _ bU I 119510 LAN-AIR f64.40 ELECTRIC PARTS 114541 MIMANH, T. LE 538.5E MILEAGE S 045A1 LLE t Ra COBS U1 ".. eP....... _ RVU]WGEBING SHBYICES P1-33 _ 314543 LINITORGUE CORP $296.65 MECHANICAL REPAIRS �I 114544 NP LINDSTROM INC $4,752.45 CONSULTING SERVICES - ENVIRONMENTAL .42 —..___0.YETSe_3UPP1•TE9___ 114546 AJ LYNCH CO S1N11.25 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 114547 NDS NUCLEAR INC $2.165.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT MALD-ST AN SET"VALUATION - RANCHO DBL RIC 114549 HANLEY?S BOILER REPAIR CO. INC S60b19 BOILER 88PAIR6 114550 RANTER $272.21 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES •'AS9S PeP°CT 0�•e °E+P.Ctlt _—SAINTING________ 114552 MARSHALL INDUSTRIAL TECH S949.00 VIDEO RENTAL 114553 MATT CHLOR INC $2.399.53 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES .c5.29 _____---FH0T9_SERVICBS 114555 MCNERNA ENGR t EQUIP ST.205.44 PUMP PARTS 114556 MCMASTER.CARR SUPPLY CD 5992.2E MECHANICAL SUPPLIES i6J.19—__.... ___—__.__INSTRUMENT PARTS 114558 MICROAGE CONPUTCA 11.021.34 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 234559 MILLAR ELEVATOR SERVICE 5472.66 SERVICE AGREEMENT S2-TA —_—. INSTRINE ___ 114561 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO $6.112.52 INSTRUMENT PARTS 114562 JANES M MONTGOMERY 53.39S.S7 ENGINEERING SERVICES AO • 9199 JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5115/91 PAGE 5 ^�- %EPORT NUMBER AP45 Q CLAIMS PAID 95/22/91 POSTING DATE RS/22 22/9/91 MIGRANT NO, VEND "GUNT F.L[9/2i10N 114563 MORTON SALT ANO/OR $450.21 SALT COMMUNICATIONS PARTS 214965 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES INC $1.125.88 VA MUCKSERVICES -- 114566 GUST N NEWBERG CORSI CO $1.050.659.34 CONSTRUCTION P1-33 NEWPORT STATION— f69.96 OPFICE_SUPPLIES____ 124568 RJ NOBLE COMPANY $6.809.01 EMERGENCY SEVER REPAIR-DISK 5 114569 NORCAL CONTROLS IOC $650.52 COMPRESSOR PARTS 89.12 _ SAFETY GLASSES ___ 114571 OFFICE PAVILION/INTERIOR RES S90.539.58 OFFICE FURNITURE 114572 ON SYSTEMS CO t34.66T.21 CHLORINE M.O.2-14-90 MEETING 6 TRAINIMO EKPENSE 114574 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPL SSP0.3T ELECTRIC SOPPLI148 114575 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C 5259.51 TRUCK PARTS 2. VALVES 114577 OXYGEN SERVICE 91.438.47 SPECIALTY SURE 114578 CSDOC SELF-FUNDED MEDICAL I S180.000.00 PREMIUM ADVANCE COUNTY SANTTAT'n- 6.4lrul� RBIMBUR88 WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FUR® 114589 COUNTY OF ORANGE - EMA $229.66 - PERMITS 114591 PSSI S5.135.44 TV SEWER SERVICES PACIFIC AEROGRA AERIAL PHOTOS ITT 114583 PACIFIC PARTS 2257.75 OFFICE SUPPLIES X 110584 PACO PUMPS 5335.89 PUMP PARTS = D EQUIPMENT RENTAL by 114586 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS t112.91 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 114567 PAGEMET $53.90 EQUIPMENT RENTAL -1 TRUCK PARTS 114589 PEAT MINNICK MAIN f CO $10.000.00 AUDITID SER IC e . .3--J�-- 1 bcp 114590 ROY PENOERORAFT 9450.00 DEFBRRBD COMP DISTRIBUTION In I .....94 ELECTRIC PARTS I1A 592 PIMA GAS SYSTEMS INC 966.251.50 RESIDUALS- REMO�V L M.O.S-11-88 114593 PL41NS TR OE VALUE HARDWARE $79.20 HARDWARE 4%96 POLY ENTERPRISES INC 309.92 SAFETY SUPPLIES 114595 POLYPURE - INC $15.282.67 CATIONIC POLYMER K.O.3-11-87 114596 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO $931.63 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 114S97 POUFR SYSTEMS CO 14 24 00 _____INSTRUNONT PARTS _ 114598 PREMIUM COMM OF AMERICA $16.452.50 VIDEO PROD. 20Zb-VISYON^-R.67SSIf=90 114599 PRESENTATION PRODUCTS $218.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES 14,11a ICE 114601 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. S4.756.00 INBTR ATION fFSFk�'1'1bF!-NO- 114602 PUBLISH 529.95 PUBLICATION j A L115.96 ._— _EARTHQUAKE SAFEIR MOLDDOWNS 114604 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO 51.174.99 TRASH REMOVAL 114605 RAININ IN31RUMENT CO.. INC $19.13 LAB SUPPLIES 114606 RECTC INC $14,677.13 RESIDUALS REMOVAL N.0.7-11-90 11460T P3CC CORP 9 REDLINE ENT s1.149.90 —8TR661-SVEEPIN� 114608 RED VALVE CO INC t74.N9 VALVES FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL a1UCESSINO DATE S/IS/91 P49E -6 REPORT NUMBER AP45 RANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 35122/91 POSTING DATE 05122191 EACMP119K _ 114669 RED WING SHOES $194.26 SAFETY SHOES COURIER SERVICE 114611 REMEDY TEMP $3.742.58 TEMPORARY SERVICES 114612 REMOTE METER RESETTING GIST 13.031.00 POSTAGE 0 7.76 PLUMBING SUPPLIES _ 114614 REMOLD INC. SI5T.80 MECHANICAL PARTS 114615 J R ROBERTS CORP 142,467.00 CONSTRUCTION J-23-1 5D CONSTRUCTION J-7-4 1 114617 J R ROBERTS $5.439.79 CONSTRUCTION J-27 114610 GEORGE ROBERTSON $664.05 M68TING 6 TRAVEL EXPENSE .a9 _ INSTRUMENT PART _ 114620 PEGGY RUPP S525.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 114621 RUTLAND TOOL 6 SUPPLY $48.34 MACHINE REPAIRS _ STEEL 114623 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP 1112.80 PARTS CLEANER 114624 SAFETY SUPPLY OF AMERICA .167.02 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES DB.08 __MANHOLE COATING DIST 7 114626 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $1.159.27 ELECTRIC MOTOR 114627 DOUG SARVIS $339.00 MEETING 6 TRAINING EXPENSE fTl .7A _ MEETING 6 TRAINING EXPENSE >C 114629 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT4L 964.910.17 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-13--90 = 114630 SEA COAST 'DESIGNS $2.107.20 OFFICE FURNITURE to...I RENEWED INC ._ INSTRUMENT_SUPPLIES CC 114632 SHAMROCK SUPPLY S2.306.99 HARDWARE -4 114633 SHURELUCK SALES $1.935.21 TOOLS PHYSICAL EXAMS 11463E SLIDE MASTER 959.46 PRESENTATION AIDS Q3 11463E SAITH_EMER♦ CO $220.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89 j.18 TRAINING REGISTRATION 11463E SOFT VAREHOUSE/WESTERN REDID f270.90 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 114639 SONNENSCNEIN NAT" 6 RODENT" $1.752.75 LEGAL SERVICES - PERSONNEL i114640 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY1290.0ft PERMIT FEES 314641 SO CALIF COASTAL WATER $260.083.00 SCCNRPA DUESK.0.5-9-TF 114642 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO $25.927.46 POWER 414, SO CAL GAS ED 43.14 RA GA —NATUL S .... 314644 SO CALIF VOTER CO f32.40 WATER-US6 114645 SOUVENIR PHOTO $235.26 PHOTO SERVICES WATERDRINKING WATER/COOLER RB ALS 111617 STAMEN Z SPASSOFF PE $1.430.00 ENGINE - 11461E WEST ALLOT INC $933.28 WELDING SUPPLIES 27.22 TOOLS 114650 STERLING ART $51.89 ART SUPPLIES 114651 SUMMIT STEEL $1,819.55 STEEL CONTRACT GROUIBSEESPING M.O.6-9-09 114653 SUNSET FORD 939.76 7PEUCRPARTS 114654 SUPER CHEM CORP $1.529.60 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES e F( AO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5116191 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER 4P43 CLAIMS P41D 15/22/91 POSTING DATE 15/22/91 WARRANT NO SIPTIDtl __ 11R653 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL INC S8.699.17 TOOLS PRINTING 114657 MANIN TALEBI $51.00 MEETING 6 TMINING EKPENSE 114650 TAUBER ELECTRONICS 9911.21 BATTERIES .LAAA62 ___ TRUCK PARTS 114660 TECHNICAL PRODUCTS L CTRLS 12,228.07 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 114661 CHARLES E THOMAS $904.51 TRUCK PARTS 1 SECURITY LOCKS 114663 TOTAL PREVENTION SYSTEMS 11.000.68 ENGINEERING SERVICBB 1--. 114664 TONNE ADVERTISERS 1/0.97 PRINTING •FAUN iy\V Ff v\Y59 \1.51.1612_ __ TMVEL SERVICE8 M.O.6-13-90 _ 114666 NO TRERICE CO $211.81 INSTRUMENT PARTS 114667 IS TRIPP $1,155.06 WINDOW CLEANING J'R.S7 TRUCK PARTS 114669 JG TUCKER L SON INC S976.32 INSTRUMENT PARTS 114670 TWINING LABORATORIES OF S5.49R.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.6-16-09 7R.ov SAFETY SUPPLIES_ 114672 THE UNISOURCE CORP S114.97 PRIER 119673 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 9169.72 PARCEL SERVICES LAB SERVICES fr 114675 VWR SCIENTIFIC $2.357.74 LAB SUPPLIES = 114676 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO 98.605.59 PLUMBING SUPPLIES .-. 2 TRUCK PARTS to I14670 PINING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY S494.05 SAFETY SUPPLIES I11679 PILLAGE NURSCRIFS f16.51 GROUND COVER LIAEINSIIPANCE CLAMS ADMINISTRATOR 0U 114681 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY 19/.270.69 CAUSTIC SODA M.O. - -9 1 114682 CHARLES WHITE $120.36 MEETING 6 TMINING EXPENSES V OFFICE SUPPLIES 114684 WILLIAM ASSOCIATES S2.735.04 ENGINEERING SERVICES2-26-3 111685 XEROX CORP $1.413.24. COPIER LEASES f.AiR& NFNR Ri Y\RDLFi [G _ fS21.B9 VALVED I14687 EVERETT H YORK ..0 1114.60 ENGINE PARTS 114690 RICHARD YOUNG PROD $1,356.53 - OFFICE SUPPLIES CONSTRUCTION P2-02-1 114690 RICHARD 0 EDGAR $210.00 --b—EM T)-UmDISTIBUTION ----------------- TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 05/22/91 $5.993,591.71 I FOND NO 9199 - J'P DIST UORKINO CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/16/92 PAGE 8 REPORT MURDER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION CLAIMS PAID 05/22/91 POSTMG DATE 05/22/91 _ SUMMARY AMOUNT 42 OPER FUND $10,706.62 42 CAP PAC FUND $20,156.34 OPER FUND �18,12F.77____ 03 CAP PAC FUND $8.67 A5 OPER FUND $26,108.21 5 CAP PAC FUND 6294T2- 86 OPER FUND $606.97 47 OPER FUND $27,062.16 47 CAP FAC FUND 77,3653�- -------- 411 OPER FUND $6,072.70 414 OPER FUND $92.14 _ CAP PAC FUND , 33Z3 6566 OPER FUND $342.48 4586 CAP PAC FUND $9.17 #7&14 OPER FUND JT OPER FUND $681,471.30 CORE $4,628,931.50 e X JT DIET WORKING CAPITAL FUND. 3440,380.47 2 -------------- _ bU 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting on I 19Q1 was duly posted for public inspection at the main lobby of the Districts ' offices on �p 19Q I . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this (p day of 19011 . Rita��ecret`Brown,- Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 , 11, 13 & 14 of Orange County, California d