HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-11-14 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
ojs�x„,~,• �qh
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
^tecW'M (114)962-2411
November 7, 1990
NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 1990 - 7: 30 P.M.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of
Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and
date.
Se a arrC�
Tentatively-Scheduled Upcoming Meetings: _
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday, November 28th, at 5: 30 p.m.
CONSERVATION, - Thursday, November 29th, at 5 : 30 p.m.
RECLAMATION AND REUSE
COMMITTEE
BUILDING COMMITTEE - (Date to be determined)
JOINT WORKS SELECTION - (Date to be determined)
COMMITTEE
DISTRICTS 6 , 7 5 14 - (Date to be determined)
SELECTION COMMITTEE
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFONNIA
' 1CB<C ELLIB AVENUE
VO.BO%B127
FOUMAIN VAl1EV,CAUFO9NIA 927'
0141962-2A11
JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES
Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings
November Nov 14, 1990 • • �
December Dec 12, 1990 None Scheduled
January Jan 09, 1991 Jan 23 , 1991
February Feb 13, 1991 Feb 27 , 1991
March Mar 13, 1991 Mar 27, 1991
April Apr 10, 1991 Apr 24, 1991
May May 08, 1991 May 29, 1991
June Jun 12, 1991 Jun 26 , 1991
July Jul 10, 1991 Jul 24, 1991
August Aug 14, 1991 None Scheduled
September Sep 11, 1991 Sep 25, 1991
October Oct 09, 1991 Oct 23, 1991
November Nov 13, 1991 None Scheduled
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
PCounty Sanitation Districts P.O.Box 8127.10844 fills Avenue
of Orange County,California Fountain Valley,CA 92728.8127
Telephone: (714) 962-2411
JOINT BOARDS
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 14, 1990 - 7:30 P.M.
In accordance with a requirements of California Government
Code Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72
hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written
materials relating to each agenda item are available for public
inspection in the office of the Board Secretary.
In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is
proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or
action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2, or
as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72
hours prior to the meeting date.
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll call
( 3 ) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary
(4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts
of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if
any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders)
(5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards
on specific agenda items or matters of general interest
should do so at this time. As determined by the Chairman,
speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken
for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes.
(6 ) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel
present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general
interest to the Directors. These reports are for
information only and require no action by the Directors.
(a) Report of Joint Chairman
(b) Report of General Manager
(c) Report of General Counsel
11/14/90
(7) EACH DISTRICT
ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the
following minutes will be deemed approved as
mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman:
District 1 - October 10, 1990 regular
District 2 - October 10, 1990 regular
District 3 - October 10, 1990 regular
District 5 - October 10, 1990 regular
District 6 - October 10, 1990 regular
District 7 - October 10, 1990 regular
District 11 - October 10, 1990 regular
District 13 - October 10, 1990 regular
District 14 - October 10, 1990 regular
(8) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll callvote motion ratifying payment of
claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows:
. (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will
be regarded as the same for each District represented unless
a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any
District. ) See pages "A" and "E"
10/10/90 10/24/90
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - $ 685,624.78 $1,108,083.95
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 6,550,169 .68 991,895.60
Joint Working Capital Fund - 209,668. 37 134,683.06
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 21,063.65 6,943 . 36
DISTRICT NO. 1 - 2,251 .04 613 .58
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 21,408 .86 17,646 .23
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 683,800.42 20,687.92
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 707,187.77 264,122. 66
DISTRICT NO. 6 - 320.98 597. 30
DISTRICT NO. 7 - - 2,965.86 8,168 .91
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 6,928.62 8,286.66
DISTRICT NO. 13 - 86. 35 21.00
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 1,771.65 4,682.01
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 9 6 JOINT - 18.06 1,326 .73
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,479.85 -0-
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 24.18 5,148.88
$8,895,770.12 $2,572,907 .85
-2 `..r'
11/14/90
(9) CONSENT CALENDAR - I.TEMS 9(a) THROUGH 9(n)
All matters placed on the consent calendar are
considered as not requiring discussion or further
explanation and unless any particular item is
requested to be removed from the consent calendar by
a Director, staff member, or member of the public in
attendance, there will be no separate discussion of
these items. All items on the consent calendar will
be enacted by one action approving all motions, and
casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included
on the consent calendar. All items removed from the
consent calendar shall be considered in the regular
order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item
from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by
the chair, state their name, address and designate
by letter the item to be removed from the consent
calendar.
The Chairman will determine if any items are to be
deleted from the consent calendar.
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items
appearing on the consent calendar not specifically
removed from same, as follows:
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to
issue a purchase order to Motorola Communications
and Electronics, Inc. for Purchase of Two-way
Radio Equipment (Specification No. E-193) for
additional radio equipment compatible with the
Districts' existing Motorola Communications
System, for the negotiated amount of $86 ,591 .00
plus sales tax.
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-154, receiving
and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and
awarding contract for Purchase of Ferric
Chloride, Specification No. P-122, to Imperial
West Chemical Co. , at the unit price of $160. 11
per dry ton, plus sales tax, for a one-year
period beginning December 1, 1990, with provision
for a one-year extension (estimated annual cost
$1, 380,225.00) . See page "C"
(c) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Central
Laboratory, Job No. J-17, authorizing a net
addition of $18,709 .00 to the contract with
J. R. Roberts Corporation for seven items of
additional or deleted work. See page "D"
-3-
11/14/90
(9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(d) Consideration of motion approving Change order
No. 4 to the plans and specifications for Gas
Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1,
Job No. P1-34-1, authorizing an addition of
$37,916.00 to the contract with Ziebarth a Alper
for five items of additional work. See page
"E"
(a) Consideration of the following actions relative
to Miscellaneous Modifications and Improvements
to Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-37:
(1) Consideration of motion approving Change
Order No. 10 to the plans and specifications
for said project, authorizing a net addition
of $108,939.00 to the contract with ziebarth
6 Alper for 16 items of additional or
deleted work, and granting a time extension
of 128 calendar days for completion of said
additional work. See page F.
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-155,
accepting said project as complete,
authorizing execution of a Notice of
Completion and approving Final Closeout
Agreement. See page G.
(f) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Fuel
System Improvements at Plant No. 1, Specification
No. R-033-1 (Rebid) ; Fuel System Improvements at
Plant No. 2, Specification No. R-033-2 (Rebid) ;
Instrumentation Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-40 (Rebid) ; Wastehauler Sampling System at
Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-27-1; and Wastehauler
Pump Station at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-27-2,
authorizing an addition of $23,954.00 to the
contract with Schuler Engineering Corporation for
one item of additional work and granting a time
extension of 45 calendar days for completion of
said additional work. See page "H"
(g) Consideration of the following actions relative
to Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services
Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design
and construction services, preparation of
operations and maintenance manuals, and training
services re Secondary Treatment Improvements at
Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36, and Secondary
Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-42, providing for additional design
services to replace and realign existing 78-inch
ocean outfall and modify existing scum collection
system:
(1) consideration of motion to receive, file and
approve the Selection Committee
certification of the final negotiated fee
for said additional services. see page 1 '
"I" .n
[ITEM (9) (g) CONTINUED ON PAGE 5]
-4-
11/14/90
(9 ) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(g) (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-156,
`.,.� approving Addendum No. 1 to said agreement
with John Carollo Engineers for said
additional services, on an hourly-rate basis
for labor plus overhead, plus direct
expenses and fixed profit, for an additional
amount not to exceed $180,232.00, increasing
the total authorized compensation from
$4,997,841.00 to an amount not to exceed
$5,178,073.00. See page "J"
(h) Consideration of the following actions relative
to the Professional Services Agreement with
Ecosystems Engineering a Analyses for ecological
consulting and statistical data analyses
services:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and
approve the Selection Committee
certification of the final negotiated fee
for said services. See page "K"
(2) consideration of Resolution No. 90-157,
approving Professional Services Agreement
with Ecosystems Engineering 6 Analyses for
said services, at the rate of $65.00 per
hour, including overhead and profit, for an
amount not to exceed $84,000 .00, plus
technical and clerical staff services,
materials and supplies, and travel and
lodging, for a total amount not to exceed
$142,000.00 for a one-year period beginning
November 15, 1990. See page "L"
(i) Consideration of motion authorizing the General
Manager to employ two Laboratory Scientists at
the top step of the salary range (currently
$5,061.00 per month) for this position
classification to work in the Districts '
Technical Services Department/Laboratory
Division.
DISTRICT 3
(j ) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-174-3 ,
approving pipeline license agreement with
Southern Pacific Transportation Company (SPTC)
required in connection with construction of the
Lampson Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-24-2;
and authorizing payment to SPTC in the amount of
$510.00 for said right-of-way. See page
-5-
11/14/90
(9) DISTRICT 5 - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(k) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 1 to the plans and specifications for South
Coast Trunk Sewer, Phase I, Contract No. 5-35-1,
authorizing an addition of $26,195.00 to the
contract with W. H. Ebert Corporation for four
items of additional work, and granting a time
extension of six calendar days for completion of
said additional work. See page "N"
(1) Consideration of the following actions relative
to Improvements to Bay Bridge Pump Station,
Contract No. 5-33, and Improvements to Bayside
Drive Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-34:
(1) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to
negotiate an agreement with the City of
Newport Beach for a cooperative project to
install raised medians along Pacific Coast
Highway, requested by the City, in
conjunction with the District's construction
contract.
(2) Consideration of motion authorizing the
Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum
No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement
with Robert Bain, William Frost a Associates
for design of Contract Nos. 5-33 and 5-34 to
provide for additional design and surveying
services for abandonment of the Corona
del Mar Pump Station, installation of an
interim pump station and changes requested
by CALTRANS and the City of Newport Beach.
DISTRICTS 6 ,7 & 14
(m) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection
Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the
Professional Services Agreement with Boyle
Engineering Corporation for design of
Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to
Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A; Baker-Gisler
Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview
Road, Contract No. 14-1-1B; Baker Force Main,
from Main Street Pump Station to Bristol Street,
Contract No. 14-1-2; and Fairview Relief Sewer,
Contract No. 6-12, to provide for additional
design and construction support services required
because of needed sewer alignment modifications
and wage escalations due to delays in the final
design of Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview
Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A. 1 '
-6- ...
11/14/90
9) DISTRICT 7 - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(n) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-175-7,
ordering annexation of 1.0 acres of territory to
the District in the vicinity of Cowan Heights
Drive and Fox Spring Road in unincorporated
County territory (Annexation No: 133 - Pell
Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 ) .
See page .0.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
( 10) consideration of action on items deleted from
Consent Calendar, if any
-7-
11/14/90
(11) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of the following actions relative to - -
Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2,
Job No. P2-42-1:
(a) verbal staff report
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-158, approving plans
and specifications for Electrification of Pump Drives at
Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-1, and authorizing
the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of
bids (Tentative bid date December 18, 1990) . See page
"P"
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
Consider�n of actions relative to Final Supplement No. 1
to Program Environmental Impact Report on Collection,
Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan re Interplant
Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. 1-9:
(a) verbal report of EIR Consultant
(b) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report
and Summary dated November 5, 1990 re said Final
Supplement No. 1. See page "4=
(c) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve
Final Supplement No. 1 to Program Environmental Impact
Report on Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities
re Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job
No. I-9; and certify that said Final Supplement has been
completed in compliance with the State and Districts '
Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 , as amended
(d) Discussion
(a) Consideration of Resolution 90-159, certifying the Final
Supplement No. 1 to Program Environmental Impact Report
for the County Sanitafion Districts' Collection,
Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan re
. Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9;
making certain findings relating to significant
environmental effects identified in the Supplement No. 1
to Program Environmental Impact Report re Interplant
Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9 ( "The
Project" ) ; adopting a statement of overriding
considerations; adopting mitigation measures and
monitoring plan; and authorizing the filing of a Notice
of Determination re said project. Seepage "R"
-8-
11/14/90
(13) ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Report of the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse
Committee and consideration of motion to *receive, file
and approve the Committee's written report of the
meeting on October 25, 1990 (Copy enclosed. with
Directors' agenda material)
(b) Consideration of action on the following items
recommended by the Conservation, Reclamation and
Reuse Committee:
(1) Consideration of motion approving Phase II Sludge
Management Implementation Plan.
(2) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection
Committee to solicit proposals, in accordance with
the Boards' adopted procedures, for initial
consulting services to assist in implementation of
the Phase II Sludge Management Implementation Plan,
for consideration by the Boards.
( 3) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-160, amending
Classification and Compensation Resolution
No. 79-20, as amended, authorizing the addition
of one Principal Environmental Specialist
($3419/$4444 per month) to the conservation,
Reclamation and Reuse Division to help administer
the Districts' sludge management program.
( 14) ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of
motion to receive, file and approve the Committee's
written report of the meeting on October 24, 1990
(Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material)
(b) Consideration of action on the following items
recommended by the Executive Committee:
(1) Consideration of the following actions relative to
the Interim Discharge Permit of the Stringfellow
Waste Disposal site:
(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file
letter from the Santa Ana Watershed Project
Authority dated August 29, 1990, requesting
an extension of the interim permit to
discharge pretreated groundwater from the
Stringfellow Waste Disposal Site to the
Districts' sewerage system.,
(b) Consideration of motion to receive and file
Staff Report dated October 17, 1990 relative
to the request for Stringfellow permit
extension.
[ITEM (14 ) CONTINUED ON PAGE 10]
-9-
11/14/90
(14) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from Page 9)
(b) (1) (c) Consideration of motion authorizing and
directing the staff to authorize the
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority to
issue an extension of the interim California .
Department of Health Services (DOHS) permit
for discharge of pretreated groundwater from
the Stringfellow Waste Disposal Site to the
Districts' sewerage system from December 31,
1990 to December 31, 1993, and providing that
said extension be subject to continuing
satisfactory progress by DOHS and the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in
addressing the long-term clean-up solution
for the Stringfellow site.
(d) Consideration of motion authorizing
modification of the conditions of the
Stringfellow permit to remove duplicate
language and reorganize the sequence of
its sections; and changing the daily
inspection and monitoring requirement to
"once each time a tested-and-approved,
sealed effluent tank is discharged, or on
a daily basis, whichever is less frequent" .
(2) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection
Committee to negotiate a Professional Services
Agreement with James M. Montgomery Engineers to
prepare an emissions inventory report and health
risk assessment report in order to comply with
AS 2588, California Air Toxics "Hot Spots"
Information and Assessment Act Of 1987, for
consideration by the Boards
( 3 ) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-161, amending
Resolution No. 90-26 which amends Classification
and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended,
increasing the authorized annual expenditure for
the Engineering and Scientific Intern Program from
$60,000.00to an amount not to exceed $105,000.00,
to allow up to seven (rather than three) currently-
employed college students to work part-time during
the school year. -
(4) (NOTE: Executive Committee recommendations re
Capital Improvement Program, 1990-92 Series A
Certificates of Participation, are included
in Item 16 below)
-10-
' (15) ALL DISTRICTS 11/14/90
(a) Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee and consideration
of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee's
written report of the meeting held on October 30, 1990
�J (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material)
(b) Consideration of action on the following items
recommended by the Fiscal Policy Committee:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Annual
Audit Report submitted by (XPMG) Peat, Marwick,
Main a Company, Certified Public Accountants, for
the year ending Tune 30, 1990 (mailed to Directors
under separate cover by auditors) .
(2) (NOTE: Fiscal Policy Committee recommendations
re Capital Improvement Program, 1990-92 Series A
Certificates of Participation, are included in
Item 16 below)
(16) ALL. DISTRICTS -
Consiaer�on of the following actions re Capital Improvement
Program, 1990-92 Series ACertificates of Participation,
pursuant to the Boards' adopted long-range financial plan:
(a) Verbal report of Fiscal Policy Committee and
staff/consultant finance team
(b) Consideration of the following resolutions approving
Capital Improvement Program, 1990-92 Series A Certificates
of Particlpation,pursuant to the Boards' adopted long-range
financial plan: See page "S"
DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. COP MAXIMUM AMOUNT
1 90-162-1 $ 9,260,000
2 90-163-2 26,250,000
3 90-164-3 28,370,000
5 90-165-5 8,480,000
6 90-166-6 6,920,000
7 90-167-7 9,810,000
11 90-168-11 8,570,000
13 90-169-13 340,000
14 90-170-14 2,000,000
NOTE: Said resolutions authorize issuance of Certificates
of by each respective District in the amounts
indicated above; and:
- Approve several agreements which are on file in the
Board Secretary's Office (and available at the Board
meeting) as follows:
• Trust Agreement. . . . . . . . . . .Instructions for Trustee Bank
• Acquisition Agreement. . . . .Each District agrees to fund
project
Assignment Agreement. . . . . .Allows Trustee to pay investors
Purchase Contract. . . . . . . . .Promise by Merrill Lynch to buy
COPS
° Remarketing Agreement. . . . .Compensates Merrill Lynch for
selling COPs periodically as
interest rates and investors
change
Reimbursement Agreement. . .Terms of Letter of Credit
- Authorize execution and delivery of COPS
[ITEM (16) (b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 121
-11-
11/14/90 - ^
(16) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from Page 11)
(b) Provisions of resolutions re certificates of participation
(Continued) :
- Authorize the General Manager and General Counsel to
complete the above documents subsequent to the negotiation
process and the following limits:
• Maximum principal not to exceed $100 million
• Initial interest rate not to exceed Ssk
The Letter of Credit fee shall not exceed .30%
($3.00 per $1,000) per annum of the amount of such letter
° Term shall not exceed 25 years (August 1, 2015)
° The Underwriter's discount shall not exceed .595%
($5.95 per $1,000)
- Approve and authorize distribution of the Preliminary and
the Final Official Statement
- Appoint Texas Commerce Bank National Association as Trustee
(estimated annual fee $22,500 to $32,500)
- Appoint National Westminster Bank, PLC, as Letter of Credit
Bank (in place of the originally-recommended Industrial
Bank of Japan with which terms could not be reached)
- Authorize execution of necessary documents to effect
transactions
(17) ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Report of the Building Committee and consideration of
motion to receive, file and approve the Committee's
written report of the meeting held on October 30, 1990
(Copy enclosed with Directors- agenda material)
(b) Consideration of actions on the following items
recommended by the Building Committee:
(1) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-171, approving
Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services
Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation
relative to design of Central Laboratory, Job
No. J-17, providing for additional design services _
relative to the interior of the laboratory, on an
hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, for an
additional amount not to exceed $150,000.00,
increasing the total authorized compensation from
$491,703.00 to an amount not to exceed $641,703.00.
See page °T°
(2) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to
negotiate change orders to the plans and
specifications for Central Laboratory, Job
No. J-17, to provide for deletion of the existing
casework, modifications to the NVAC, power and
other utilities, and the substitution of new
casework, for future consideration by the Boards.
(ITEM (17) (b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 13]
-12-
11/14/90
(17) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from Page 12)
(b) (3) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to
proceed with interim existing laboratory - -
modifications; and authorizing staff to negotiate
�..►� the Purchase of Two Laboratory Trailers
(Specification No. E-194) for an amount not to
exceed $118,735.00.
' (4) Consideration of the following actions relative to
warehouse and Maintenance Building and oil Storage
and Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20:
(a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 7 to the plans and specifications for said
project, authorizing a net addition of
$204,087.60 to the contract with J. R. Roberts
Corporation for 37 items of additional or deleted
work, and granting a time extension of 145
calendar days for completion of said additional
work. See page U.
(b) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 8 to the plans and specifications for said
project, assessing liquidated damages for 115
days at $500.00 per day, for a total deduction
of $57,500.00 from the contract with
J. R. Roberts Corporation. See page "v^
(c) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 9 to the plane and specifications for said
project, authorizing an adjustment of
engineer's quantities for a total of
$32,463.So to the contract with J. R. Roberts
Corporation. See page "W.
(d) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-172,
accepting warehouse and Maintenance Building
and Oil Storage and Dispensing Improvements,
Job No. J-20, as complete, authorizing
execution of a Final Closeout Agreement and
filing of a Notice of Completion. See page
"X"
(5) Consideration of motion authorizing the General
Counsel to file a claim for professional negligence
against Pulaski and Arita, Inc. , and/or their
successor firm, and to take any other appropriate
action in pursuit of the Districts' claim, including
engagement of architectural/engineering experts for an
independent opinion and the filing of legal
proceedings.
(18) ALL DISTRICTS
ConsTd—er—aETon of the following actions relative to the Control
Center/Operations and Maintenance Building, Job No. J-23-1:
(a) Verbal staff report
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-173, approving plans and
specifications for Control Center/Operations and
Maintenance Building, Job No. J-23-1, and authorizing the
General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids
(Tentative bid date January 15, 1991) . See page
-13-
11/14/90
(19) ALL DISTRICTS
Closed Session: During the course o con uc ing t e
us Hess se orth on this agenda as aregular
meeting of the Boards, the Chairman may convene the
Boards in closed session to consider matters of
pending or potential litigation, or personnel
matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9
or 54957 .6.
Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real
property; (b) matters of pending or potential
litigation; (c) employee compensation; or which are
exempt from public disclosure under the California
Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards
during a permitted closed session and are not
available for public inspection. At such time as
final actions are taken by the Directors on any of
these sub,acts, the minutes will reflect all required
disclosures of information.
(a) Convene in closed session, if necessary
(b) Reconvene in regular session
(c) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered
in closed session.
(20) ALL DISTRICTS
Other�siness and communications or supplemental agenda items,
if any
(21) DISTRICT 1
Ot er business and communications or supplemental agenda items,
if any
(22) DISTRICT 1
consideration of motion to adjourn
(23) DISTRICT 2
Ot er usiness and communications or supplemental agenda items,
if any
(24) DISTRICT 2
CossiTtion of motion to adjourn
(25 ) DISTRICT 3
Other 5slness and communications or supplemental agenda items,
if any
(26 ) DISTRICT 3
ConsiTeratlon of motion to adjourn
(27) DISTRICT 5
Otter business and communications or supplemental agenda items,
if any
(28) DISTRICT 5
Conssi eration of motion to adjourn
-14-
12/14/90
(29 ) DISTRICT 6
OtR—e—rBdiiness and communications or supplemental agenda items,
✓ if any
( 30) DISTRICT 6 '
Consul oration of motion to adjourn
( 31) DISTRICT 13
OEhe�ness and communications or supplemental agenda items,
if any
( 32) DISTRICT 13
Considera£ion of motion to adjourn
( 33) DISTRICTS 7 6 14
Consideration Ff the following actions relative to the Baker
Force Mains, from Main Street Pump Station to Bristol Street,
Contract No. 14-1-2:
(a) Verbal staff report
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-176 , receiving and
filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding
contract for Baker Force Mains, from Main Street Pump
Station to Bristol Street, Contract No. 14-1-2, to
Mladen Buntich Construction Co. , Inc. , in the total
amount of $5,773,395.00. See page "Z"
( 34) DISTRICT 7
OtEebusiness and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
( 35) DISTRICT 7
Conssi eration of motion to adjourn
( 36 ) DISTRICT 14
O r ue—siness and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
( 37 ) DISTRICT 14
Consideration of motion to adjourn
-15-
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127. 10844 Ellis Avenue
of Orange County,California Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714) 962-2411
JOINT BOARDS
MEETING DATE
Wednesday. November 14. 1990 at 7:30 p.m.
The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine
items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise
self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material
summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting.
ALL DISTRICTS
9(a) : PURCHASE OF TWO-WAY RADIO EQUIPMENT. SPECIFICATION NO. E-193.
The Districts' two-way radio system is essential for our operations as it
provides around-the-clock communications between operations and maintenance
personnel within the expansive plant sites; and trunk sewer maintenance crews,
the source control inspectors and the construction inspection personnel in the
field. This system is especially critical in emergency situations.
The Districts' existing system is manufactured by Motorola Communications
and Electronics, Inc. and has proven to be highly reliable during both routine
operations and emergencies. The Districts presently have a maintenance
agreement with the County of Orange Communication Division to install, maintain
and repair the equipment, and the County's repair facilities and test equipment
are set up to service Motorola equipment, which is also used exclusively by the
County.
Based on added equipment required to meet expanding service requirements
and the need to replace worn out equipment, ninety-six (96) various pieces of
radio equipment are needed. Staff has negotiated a price with Motorola for 50
pagers, 37 portable "walkie-talkies", 6 vehicle radio Convert-A-Coms, 2 mobiles,
and 2 remote base stations. The unit prices on requested radio equipment are
the same as identical equipment purchased last fiscal year.
Staff requests authorization for Purchase of Two-Way Radio Equipment
(Specification No. E-193) for the Districts' communication system from Motorola
Communications and Electronics, Inc., at a negotiated price of $96,591.00, plus
sales tax. The 1990/91 equipment budget includes $105;100.00 for this
equipment. - -
v
November 14, 1996
9(b) AWARD PURCHASE OF FERRIC CHLORIDE. SPECIFICATION NO. P-122.
The Districts use ferric chloride for physical/chemical advanced primary
treatment, digester gas sulfide control and as a backup to chlorine for odor
control . The majority of the ferric chloride demand is for physical/chemical
treatment which aids in meeting our NPOES ocean discharge permit limitations.
Physical/chemical treatment is a partial alternative to constructing costly
additional secondary treatment facilities. Chemical addition enhances settling
in the primary sedimentation basins, and also reduces digester gas hydrogen
sulfide and helps meet SCAQMD requirements.
Sealed bids were received on October 2, 1990 for furnishing and
delivering ferric chloride for a one-year period, beginning December 1, 1990,
with an option for a one-year extension. Three bids were received and four
firms declined to bid. The low bid received was $160,11 per dry ton, and the
high bid was $287.22 per ton, plus applicable sales tax. The low bid represents
. a decrease of approximately 32% from the current year's contract with Imperial
West Chemical Co., which expires November 30, 1990. Based on an estimated
annual usage of 8,250 dry tons, the estimated cost is $1,380,225.00, including
sales tax.
Staff recommends award of a contract to Imperial West Chemical Co. for
Purchase of Ferric Chloride for the unit price of $160.11 per dry ton, plus
applicable sales tax, for a one-year period, with option for a one-year
extension.
9(c) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 TO CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17.
Job No. J-17, Central Laboratory, provides for the construction of a new
laboratory, upgrading of the site paving, and provisions for additional parking
at a cost of $7.1 million. Change Order No. 3 consists of seven items of work
for a net addition of $18,709.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation.
Item 1, in the amount of $10,635.00. provides for installation of cast
iron roof overflow drains in place of specified plastic roof drains. Item 2, in
the amount of $1,830.00, provides for modification of the pipe insulation on the
cold water lines for the air conditioning system. Item 3, in the amount of
$9,775.00, provides for the repair of a ruptured water line not shown on the
plans and the installation of a gate valve and anchor block. Item 4, in the
amount of $955.00, provides for the reduction in the height of a door from 8
feet 10 inches to 7 feet and changing the door butts on four doors from standard
weight to heavy duty weight.
Item 5 is a credit in the amount of $30,124.00 for various modifications
to the heating, ventilating, and air conditioning system. Item 6, in the amount
of $28,859.00, provides for the extension of the offsite chiller pipe from its
terminus northeast of the building into Room 104. Both of these changes relate
to the subsequent plan to tie these facilities to centralized utility
facilities.
Item 7 is a credit in the amount of $3,221.00 for changing the
installation of the Southern California Edison line to the laboratory.
.-2-
November 14, 1990
The above-described changes would have been included in the original
design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items are for
.i replaced work.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 3 for a net addition of
$18,709.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation. There is no time
extension associated with this change order.
9(d) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO, 4 TO GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION
PLANT NO, 1. JOB NO, P1-34-1.
Job No. P1-34-1, Gas Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1,
includes the construction of a new city water pump station, a new power
building, and a new gas compressor building at a cost of $13.1 million. The
contract also includes supplying and installing three reciprocating compressors
at Plant No. 1, and supplying three reciprocating compressors at Plant No. 2 for
future installation by others. Change Order No. 4 adds five items of work and
$37,916.00 to the contract.
Item 1, in the amount of $2,028.00, is for repairs to the existing
concrete tunnel face at Intersection F where the proposed Tunnel 4 connects with
a specified expansion joint. Item 2, in the amount of $2,365.00, is for the
boring and placement of a 4-inch pipe sleeve under the East Perimeter Road for
the installation of a 2-inch electrical manhole drain line. Item 3, in the
amount of $689.00, is for the removal of an undisclosed concrete obstruction
uncovered during the excavation of the water feed to the City•Water Pump
Station. Item 4, in the amount of $31,509.00, is for increasing the size of the
hot water piping from 6-inch diameter to 8-inch diameter. The hot water piping
will be connected to the proposed Central Generation project. The consultant
for the Central Generation project determined that the pipe size was inadequate
to serve Central Generation during the final design and recommended a size
increase. Item 5, in the amount of $1,325.00, is for the addition of equipment
drain fittings to three equipment drain lines at the Compressor Building. These
drains were designed without the fittings which are normally required for this
service.
The above-described changes would have been included in the original
design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items are for
replaced work.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 4 for an addition of
$37,916.00 to the contract with Ziebarth & Alper. There is no time extension
associated with this change order.
9(e) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 10 TO MISCELLANEOUS MODIFICATIONS AND
IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-37 AND
ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT AS COMPLETE.
The plans and specifications for this project, approved by the Directors
in September 1988, include 38 items of nonrelated rehabilitation and
correctional work. Larger items of work include replacement of the domes on
Digesters "A" and "B", replacement of two influent pumps at Headworks "C", the
installation of prepurchased barscreens at Headworks "C", replacement of grit
-3-
November 14, 1996
augers, screening conveyors, chlorine system piping and waste activated sludge
pumps, new primary influent flow meters, sheds for electric cart storage and
bypass waste activated sludge piping. Change Order No. 10 provides for sixteen
items of added or deleted work for a net addition of $108,939.00 and 128
calendar days to the contract.
(1) Change Order No. 10
Item 1, in the amount of $7,883.00, provides for the
modification of existing stainless steel foul air ductwork that
interfered with the installation of.new grit screw conveyor No. 1 to
maintain a safe working environment. The existing ductwork was not
shown on the plans nor considered in the design of the new grit
screw conveyor. Item 2, in the amount of $4,464.00, provides for
the demolition and replacement of a raised walkway and stair -
structure in the Headworks °C° grit hopper room that was not shown
on the'contract drawings but interfered with the installation of the
new grit hopper room floor drain. Item 3, in the amount of $881.00,
provides for performance of electrical testing on the new
transformer/substation considered necessary by staff but not
included in the specifications. Item 4, in the amount of $1,450.00,
provides for the reinforcement of safety handrails on removable
walkways at the barscreen roof level .
Item 5, a credit in the amount of $4,096.00, provides for the
deletion of the secondary sampler modifications. Item 6, in the
amount of $1,346.00, provides for the installation of additional
wiring to energize status signals for the belt conveyor, barscreens
and grit screw conveyors. The requirement for status light
operation was not included in specifications.
Item 7, in the amount of $15,861.00, provides for the
installation of a new 10-inch drain system at grit classifier No. 1.
The existing 6-inch drain was too small and was plugged. This
change order item also provides the contractor with a 15-calendar
day non-compensable extension of time. Item 8, in the amount of
$5,813.00, provides for relocation and added support of the two
screenings storage bin guides in the new Conveyor Building to
eliminate an interference between the bins and the overhead door
jamb. Item 9, in the amount of $24,946.00, provides for the
application of coal tar epoxy to portions of the new grit screw
conveyor units. Coating application was inadvertently omitted from
the specifications. This change order item also provides the
contractor with a 25-calendar day, non-compensable extension of
time.
Item 10, in the amount of $5,882.00, provides for the
installation, operation and maintenance of a temporary belt conveyor
to transfer grit to a hauling vehicle during the installation of new
grit screw conveyors Nos. 1 and 2. The specifications did not
-4-
November 14, 1990
address the need for a temporary conveyor. Item 11, in the amount
of $26,835.00, provides for major changes in the structure of the
�..i new Conveyor Building. Changes were required due to the existence
of major utilities that interfered with the new structure but were
not addressed in the plans. This change order item also provides
the contractor with a 60-calendar day, non-compensable extension of
time.
Item 12, a credit in the amount of $21,506.00, provides for the
deletion of the major portion of supply air and foul air ductwork in
the new Conveyor Building. A study of the air quality in the new
structure prior to the installation of the new duct systems
determined that only a limited amount of supply air duct was
required. Item 13, in the amount of $32,821.00, provides for the
reconstruction of existing drive motor bases and pump foundations
for main sewage pumps Nos. 2 and 4. The existing concrete motor
bases and pump supports could not be re-used as planned due to
differences between the plans and actual as-built conditions. This
change order item also provides the contractor with a 28-calendar
day, non-compensable extension of time.
Item 14, in the amount of $4,989.00, provides for the
application of corrosion-resistant coating on the structural steel
roof framing at the new Conveyor Building. The improved coating
system was applied as it was more suitable for the environment of
the building and would minimize future maintenance costs. Item 15,
in the amount of $510.00, reimburses the contractor for a delay
during the barscreen installations created by a failure in a
chlorine solution line in Headworks "C". Item 16, in the amount of
$860.00, provides for the repairs made by the Contractor to
Districts-furnished barscreens that were damaged by persons unknown
while stored at the site.
The above-described changes would have been included in the
original design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of
the items are for replaced work.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 10 for a net
addition of $108,939.00 to the contract with Ziebarth & Alper.
There is a 128-calendar day time extension associated with this
change order.
(2) Acceotance of Contract as Complete
Ziebarth & Alper has fulfilled all contractual obligations
within the specified and extended time. Therefore, staff recommends
adoption of the resolution attached to the agenda material ,
authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the
Final Closeout Agreement and filing of the Notice of Completion as
required. The final project cost is $5,997,956.29.
-5-
November 14, 1990�
9(f) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER N0. 1 TO D);FUEL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT
N0. 1. SPECIFICATION No. R-633-1 FUEL
FUEL SYSTEM AT PLANT
N0. 2 REBID-: INSTRUMENTATION IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-40 `/
(REBID) : WASTEHAULER SAMPLING SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-27-1:
AND. WASTEHAULER PUMP STATION AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-27-2.
In November 1989 the Directors awarded Fuel System Improvements at Plant
No. 1, Specification No. R-033-1 (Rebid); Fuel System at Plant No. 2 R-033-2
(Rebid); Instrumentation Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-40 (Rebid) ;
Wastehauler Sampling System at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-27-1; and, Wastehauler
Pump Station at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-27-2 to Schuler Engineering.Corporation.
The work includes retrofitting five existing diesel fuel storage tanks with new
tank level sensing devices, replacing four day tanks at Plant No. 2,
constructing two card-access dump ports for industrial waste and septage
discharge and constructing a new waste lift station at Plant No. 1 at a cost of
$1.6 million. Change Order No. 1 is for one item of work for an addition of
$23,954.00 and a time extension of 45 calendar days to the contract for
Wastehauler Pump Station at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-27-2.
Different soil conditions encountered required the concrete structure
walls and floor to be increased in thickness to withstand a much larger soil
pressure due to unsuitable soils encountered at the site. Additional concrete
and reinforcing steel was required for added strength and to prevent flotation.
As a result, there was also a delay of 45 calendar days caused by redesign of
the structure.
The above-described changes would have been included in the original
design if discovered or known during the design phase. None of the above work
was for replacement.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 adding $23,954.00 and a
time extension of 45 calendar days to the contract with Schuler Engineering
Corporation.
9(g) : RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND ADDENDUM
NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR
SECONDARY TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-36, AND
SECONDARY TREATMENT EXPANSION AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-42.
In October 1989, the Directors awarded a Professional Services Agreement
for preparation of plans and specifications for design and construction support
services for expansion of the secondary treatment facilities capacity to 80 mgd
at Plant No. 1 and 90 mgd at Plant No. 2, including miscellaneous support
facilities and replacement of certain existing engines with electric motors.
The plans and specifications are currently 50% complete and the first
construction job will be ready for bid the second quarter of 1991.
In the last few months of design, several additional modifications and
changes to the existing facilities have been identified as being necessary which
impact the original scope of work for this project. At Treatment Plant No. 2,
the Districts are extending the secondary clarifiers by 50 feet to increase
capacity from 75 mgd to 90 mgd. However, the existing 78-inch standby outfall
(now on standby status for emergencies) which is planned to be replaced with a
-6-
' November 14, 1990
new 120-inch outfall by the turn of the century in accordance with the 1989
Master Plan, must be moved to accommodate a new 84-inch secondary effluent pipe
which will deliver secondary effluent to the Ocean Outfall Booster Station.
Thus, instead of moving it, staff believes the 78-inch line should be replaced
with the 120-inch line as part of this project, rather than three years from now
as originally scheduled, to save money and construction activity. The work
would include the replacement of the 78-inch line just south of the plant, where
the line would join the new 120-inch section installed as part of the Pacific
Coast Highway bridge contract over the Santa Ana River, to Surge Tower No. 1.
The Operations staff has determined other needed work including
replacement of the scum collection system at the existing secondary clarifiers
to match the new clarifier design; a new field laboratory for secondary process
evaluation to be designed into the new satellite control station being
constructed; and modifications to the existing drain system have also been
identified as needed.
The Selection Committee has negotiated Addendum No. 1 to the Professional
Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for the additional services
needed to design the above-described work, on an hourly rate basis including
labor and overhead, plus direct expenses and fixed profit, for the additional
contract amount of $180,232.00, as follows:
Proposed
Existing Proposed Amended
Agreement Addn. No. 1 Agreement
Engineering services,
Including direct labor
plus overhead at 155%,
not to exceed $4,313,341 $160,921 $4,474,262
Direct expenses, at cost,
not to exceed 180,000 -0- 180,000
Fixed Profit 504,500 19,311 523,811
Total , not to exceed $4,997,841 $180,232 $5,178,073
The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection
Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above additional
work and adoption of a resolution approving Addendum No. 1 to the Professional
Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers. Copies of the certification and
resolution are attached with the agenda supporting documents.
9(h) : APPROVE AGREEMENT WITH ECOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND ANALYSES TO PERFORM
MARINE ECOSYSTEM EVALUATIONS.
During the past few years our Compliance Division staff has been
technically enhanced to play a stronger role in the NPDES marine monitoring
program. This was accomplished by adding key, highly trained and experienced
personnel , providing new monitoring tools and computers for data management,
-7
November 14, 1990
increasing the oversight and scientific interaction with our prime ocean
monitoring contractor (SAIC, Inc.), and working cooperatively with local
university experts in marine sciences. However, with ever-increasing
legislative and regulatory environmental activity, even these initiatives fall
short of what staff believes to be necessary to fully advise the Boards, state
and federal legislators and regulators, and the public on ecologically sound
choices which must be made to implement and monitor the Districts' wastewater
management program. Staff is, therefore, recommending utilization of outside
consultants with expertise in key areas of ecosystem planning and analysis.
Over the past year Dr. John Calaprice, principal of Ecosystems
Engineering and Analyses, has served the Districts as a consultant in ecological
analyses for the marine monitoring program. Dr. Calaprice is a recognized
expert in multivariate statistical studies of very large, complex data sets,
such as those collected by SAIC in our NPDES monitoring program since 1985. He
has also worked with other public agencies on problems related to wastewater
management and the environment (e.y., LA/OMA sludge project and Los Angeles
County's 301(h) waiver application) His knowledge in statistics and computer
applications was invaluable to staff in our August 1989 301(h) renewal
application. Dr. Calaprice is quite familiar with the special requirements and
opportunities presented with the Districts' utilization of treated wastewaters
and sludges.
Several specific projects aimed at improving our understanding of the
impact of waste discharge in the ocean are needed to strengthen our position
with respect to the 301(h) waiver application. They will also greatly improve '
our own capabilities to independently assess the massive data base we have
accumulated since 1970.
The Selection Committee has negotiated an agreement with Ecosystems
Engineering and Analyses for the above-described services in an amount not to
exceed $142,000, for a one-year period, as follows:
Consulting and Project Direction fees
for John Calaprice at $65.00 per
hour (includes 25% overhead and
5% profit), not to exceed $ 84,000
Fees for Projects:
1. Technical and Clerical Staff,
at cost plus 25% overhead
and 5% profit
2. Materials and Supplies at cost
Subtotal , not to exceed 55,000
Travel and Lodging at cost, not to exceed 3,000
Total Maximum Annual Cost $142,000
The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection
Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee and adoption of a
resolution approving the Professional Services Agreement with Ecosystems
Engineering and Analyses. Copies of the certification and resolution are
attached with the agenda supporting documents.
-8-
November 14, 1990
9(i) : AUTHORIZING EMPLOYMENT OF TWO SCIENTISTS AT TOP OF LABORATORY SUPERVISOR
POSITION SALARY RANGE.
The Laboratory Division is responsible for performing chemical analyses
of air, wastewater, sludge and ocean water in support of the various activities
of the Sanitation Districts. These activities include: industrial source
monitoring, influent and effluent wastewater characterization, sludge quality
monitoring for reuse purposes, and ocean water chemical and bacterial quality.
Thirty-one people are currently employed in the Laboratory. The Boards have
authorized a staffing level of 38 individuals. This additional staffing is
necessary to accommodate the additional impact of emerging regulatory
requirements on the Districts.
We have been recruiting for some time to fill key scientist positions in
the Laboratory. These positions are necessary to provide a much higher level of
technical expertise and supervisory skills to support the expanded scope of the
Laboratory's work. Two candidates have been selected for these positions based
on their education, experience, and supervisory communication skills.
The first candidate, who is currently employed as a Scientist/Engineer,
will head the Laboratory's Air Analysis section. This candidate has a Ph.D. in
Environmental Engineering, M.S. degree in Environmental Engineering, M.S. degree
in Chemical Engineering, MBA in Business Management, and a B.S. degree in
Chemical Engineering. He has worked extensively in the field of air analysis
for over 12 years and has an excellent working relationship with both the staff
and management of SCAQMD Laboratories and Engineering Divisions.
The second candidate, who is currently employed as a Senior
Scientist/Engineer, will head the Laboratory's Instrumental Analysis section.
This candidate has an MBA in Business Administration and a B.A. degree in
Mathematics. She currently supervises a number of state-of-the-art laboratories
which include analytical chemistry, environmental analysis, space physics and
mechanical testing. She has over 12 years of direct experience working with all
aspects of modern instrumental methods of analysis and chemical testing. She
also has had extensive direct project management responsibilities for developing
and implementing new environmental technologies and database tracking systems
to ensure environmental compliance. She has excellent leadership and
supervisory skills.
Both of these candidates are currently earning considerably more than the
Districts' staff is authorized to offer (mid-point of the salary range) and, in
fact, are now earning more than the top step of the Districts' Laboratory
Supervisor position. Nevertheless, they have expressed an interest in working
for the Districts and changing from an industrially-based to an environmentally-
oriented career. Staff is therefore requesting authorization to employ these
individuals as laboratory scientists at the top of the salary range (currently
$5,061 per month) of the Districts' Laboratory Supervisor classification.
-9-
November 14, 1990
DISTRICT 3
9(j) : APPROVE PIPELINE LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION
COMPANY RE LAMPSON INTERCEPTOR SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-24-2.
The Lampson Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-24-2, requires construction
of approximately 3,900 feet of 21-inch and 24-inch VCP sewer pipe. The new
sewer will cross underneath existing Southern Pacific Railroad tracks
approximately 250 feet west of Santa Rosalia Street in Lampson Avenue. The
railroad requires approval of an agreement, which will act as a permit, prior to
allowing construction of the sewer underneath the railroad tracks. Southern
Pacific will grant to District No. 3 the right to construct, reconstruct,
maintain and operate the sewer in accordance with the indenture and will charge
the District the sum of $510.00 in consideration for this right. This agreement
indemnifies and holds harmless Southern Pacific its officers, agents and
employees from all claims, damages, suits, and other liabilities arising from
the construction and placement of the sewer pipeline underneath the railroad
tracks.
Staff recommends approval of a resolution authorizing execution of said
pipeline license agreement on behalf of District No. 3 and authorizing payment
to Southern Pacific Transportation Company in the amount of $510.00.
DISTRICT 5
9(k) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOUTH
COAST TRUNK SEWER. CONTRACT NO. 5-35-1.
This $900,000.00 project is the installation of 24- and 20-inch ductile
iron pipe (DIP) and 18- and 15-inch vitrified clay pipe (VCP) gravity sewer
relief lines plus laterals. The project is the first of three contracts to
install collection facilities to serve the developing community south of the
City of Newport Beach (Corona Del Mar) . Change Order No. 1, in the amount of
$26,195.00, adds four items of work and six calendar days to the project.
Item 1, in the amount of $12,851.00, provides for protection and repair
of an undisclosed water utility vault. Item 2, in the amount of $996.00,
provides for relocation of the bore pit which interfered with an undisclosed
natural gas line. Item 3, in the amount of $827.00, is for concrete encasement
of the 15-inch VCP to protect it because of depth and widening of the trench.
Item 4, in the amount of $11,521.00, is for the removal of two undisclosed,
abandoned storm drain concrete wing walls which interfered with the new 21-inch
sewer.
The above-described changes would have been included in the original
design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items are for
replaced work.
Staff recommends approval of.Change Order No. 1, adding $26,195.00 and a
time extension of six calendar days to the contract with W. H. Ebert
Corporation.
-10-
November 14, 1990
9(1) : ACTIONS RE IMPROVEMENTS TO BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION. CONTRACT NO. 5-33,
AND IMPROVEMENTS TO BAYSIDE DRIVE TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 5-34.
Under design are projects for the rehabilitation and upgrading of the Bay
Bridge Pump Station at Pacific Coast Highway and Bayside Drive, and the design
of new sewer collection facilities within Bayside Drive and Pacific Coast
Highway extending to the southerly limits of Newport Beach. When completed,
these projects will provide capacity for the developing Newport Beach down
coast area, allow the abandonment of the existing Corona Del Mar Pump Station
and upgrade the reliability, including earthquake strengthening, of the Bay
Bridge Pump Station. The design is nearly complete under a contract approved in
May 1988 with Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates (RBF) .
(1) Cooperan ative Agreement with Newport Beach to include City-requested
medis in Pacific Coast Highway in Improvements to Bayside Drive
Trunk Sewer. Phase 3. Contract No. 5-34-3
As the Directors are aware, this project will be constructed
within Pacific Coast Highway after the opening of Pelican Hill Road
via a combination of open trench construction and tunneling. The
District has had several coordination meetings with the City of
Newport Beach and the Laguna Beach County Water District and has
learned that the City would like to include the construction of
medians with the attendant landscaping and irrigation systems as
part of our Phase 3 contract. In open cut areas this would not add
significantly to the District's contract. However, southerly of
Morning Canyon Road and extending to the City limit, the District's
construction would take place by tunneling. If the medians are
placed at the tunnel bore pits, again, significant additional costs
would not be incurred. But, if full length medians are included, as
well as landscaping and irrigation, the costs could become
substantial . Therefore, authority to negotiate a cooperative
agreement with the City of Newport Beach to reimburse the District
for this work is recommended.
(2) Addendum No. 3 to Professional Services Agreement with RBF
In addition to the above-described city-requested work, staff
is recommending that the abandonment of the Corona Del Mar Pump
Station (upon completion of the new gravity sewer) be included in
the project, as well as an interim pump station soon to be built
southerly of the City limit. (The interim pump station will be paid
for by The Irvine Company.) Additionally, late revisions to the
traffic control plans necessary for coordination with the Laguna
Beach County Water District line replacement and other changed
conditions, including additional surveying, are required. These
changes, requested by CALTRANS and the City of Newport Beach,
include preparation of traffic control plans and signage which will
aid in the joint traffic detour since the project will be
constructed concurrently with the Laguna Beach County Water District
work.
-11-
November 14, 1996
The recommended actions are to authorize Staff to negotiate with the City
of Newport Beach for the cooperative project reimbursement agreement; and to
authorize the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 3 to the
Professional Services Agreement with Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates for
the additional work. Following the negotiations, both the agreement with the
City and proposed Addendum No. 3 will be presented to the Board for
consideration.
DISTRICTS 6. 7 AND 14
9(m) : AUTHORIZE SELECTION COMMITTEE TO NEGOTIATE ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR
BAKER-GISLER INTERCEPTOR. CONTRACTS NOS. 14-1-1A AND 14-1-1B, AND BAKER
FORCE MAINS. CONTRACT NO. 14-1-2.
On July 13, 1988, the Directors approved Addendum No. 1 to the
Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design
and construction support services for Contracts Nos. 14-1-1A, 14-1-1B, 14-1-2
and 6-12. At that time, design for the four contracts was scheduled to be
completed by the spring of 1989 and construction by early 1990. Presently, the
Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road, Contract No.
14-1-1B, has been completed, and award of the contract for Baker Force Mains,
Main Street Pump Station to Bristol Street, Contract No. 14-1-2, slated for
tonight's meeting (see Agenda Item 33) .
Design and construction for Contracts 14-1-1A and 14-1-2 have now been
delayed one-and-one-half years due to right-of-way acquisition proceedings; and
the Fairview Relief Sewer, Contract No. 6-12, has been on hold due to financial
constraints.
We have procured an easement through the John Wayne Airport parking lot
from Orange County GSA. Currently, Counsel and staff are in the process of
attempting to secure easements from the Southern California Edison Company, the
Mesa Verde.Country Club and Magna Enterprises for Contract No. 14-1-1A. The
sewer alignment across the SCE and Mesa Verde Country Club has been designed as
outlined in the Project Report. It now appears that the sewer alignment through
the SCE property and the location of the Santa Ana River crossing will have to
be revised. The impact of the change in alignment may require changes to the
District No. 6 river crossing. These revisions will necessitate a hydraulic
re-analysis of this portion of the system as well as extensive revisions to the
plans resulting in the preparation of additional drawings.
Negotiations with the Mesa Verde Country Club currently call for
improvements to the golf course to be incorporated into the Districts' contract.
This will include a realigned golf cart path, regrading, sod replacement,
replanting of trees and revisions to the irrigation system for the northerly
portion of the affected fairway. This work may require Boyle Engineering
Corporation to retain a qualified golf course architect.
Staff therefore recommends that the Selection Committee be authorized to
negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle for
the above-described additional engineering services including an increase in
-12-
November 14, 1990
costs for wages and benefits, etc., brought about by the delays to Contracts
Nos. 14-1-1A and 6-12. Following the Selection Committee's negotiations with
Boyle Engineering Corporation, the proposed addendum will be presented to the
Boards for consideration.
DISTRICT 7
9(n) : ORDERING ANNEXATION NO. 133--PELL ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT NO. 7.
This 1.0-acre annexation is for one single family residence with one
additional residence proposed in the future, located in the vicinity of Cowan
Heights Drive and Fox Spring Road in the unincorporated County community of .
Cowan Heights. (Cowan Heights has about 160 acres left to be annexed to the
District.) The local sewering agency is County Sanitation District No. 7.
The proposed annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated
agreement with the County of Orange re AB 8 tax exchanges for annexing
properties.
Staff recommends approval of the resolution attached to the agenda
material ordering Annexation No. 133.
ALL DISTRICTS
11: APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS RE ELECTRIFICATION OF PUMP DRIVES
AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-42-1.
In accordance with the adopted Facilities Master Plan and permit
requirements of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) , the
Directors have authorized a series of projects to upgrade and expand existing
treatment facilities. Job No. P1-36, a $35 million secondary treatment
expansion project at Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Job No. P2-42, a $27 million
secondary treatment expansion project at Treatment Plant No. 2, are both
currently under design.
Additionally, the Central Power Generation System facilities are
currently under construction at Plant No. 2 (a $20 million contract), while bids
for the Plant No. 1 Central Power Generation System facilities, at $15.4 million
cost, were received on November 6. (The major equipment components for these
two projects were purchased under separate contracts. The total estimated cost
of the Central Power Generation Systems at both plants is $66 million.)
SCAQMD requirements include replacement of existing internal combustion
engines with electric motor drives. This project, Electrification of Pump
Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-1, will modify existing systems
to meet the requirements of the SCAQMD and allow the continuous operation of the
Central Power Generation System facilities at Plant No. 2.
In October 1989 the Directors approved an agreement with John Carollo
Engineers to prepare plans and specifications for Jobs P1-36 and P2-42. The
plans and specifications for the electrification portion at Plant No. 2 (Job No.
P2-42-1) are now complete. This job will replace existing engine drives and
-13-
November 14, 1996
obsolete motors and pumps at Headworks B and C, the Plant Effluent Pump Station,
and the Plant Water Pump Station. The replacement equipment will include high
efficiency pumps and motors, programmable logic controllers (PLCs) , and various `I
structures to enclose the new variable frequency drive equipment and
computerized controllers. The above-listed equipment to be supplied has been
restricted to a limited number of preapproved manufacturers in accordance with,
the action taken by the Boards of Directors on August 8, 1990.
Staff recommends approval of plans and specifications and authorization
for the General Manager to establish the bid date for Job No. P2-42-1. The
bid date is tentatively scheduled for December 18, 1990, based on the upcoming
debt financing program determinations. The engineer's estimate for this work is
$16,000,000.
12: CEOA ACTIONS RE SUPPLEMENT MO. 1 TO PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
FOR COLLECTION. TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES MASTER PLAN RE
INTERPLANT PIPELINE AND UTILITY CORRIDOR. JOB NO. I-9.
At the October meeting, the Directors received and filed the Draft
Supplement No. 1 to the Program Environmental Impact Report for Collection,
Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan which provides for the additional
environmental review necessary to approve the interplant pipeline and utility
corridor project, and conducted a public hearing. Following the hearing the
Boards directed staff and consultant to address the comments received during the
public comment period that closed October loth, in a Final Supplement No. 1 to
the Program Environmental Impact Report to be considered by the Boards at the
regular Board meeting in November.
The environmental consultant, K2 Environmental , has prepared the Final
Supplement No. 1 to the Program Environmental Impact Report on the Collection,
Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The Final Supplement includes
copies of all of the public commentary and the responses to the comments.
Attached to the supporting agenda material is a Staff Report and Summary
of the Final Supplement No. 1 to the Program Environmental Impact Report for
Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, addressing Interplant
Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9, along with the proposed resolutions
necessary to comply with CEQA. If any Director desires a full copy of the Final
Supplement No. 1, please contact Jean Tappan at (714) 962-2411, extension 311.
Questions concerning the Supplement or the project should be directed to Tom
Dawes, Director of Engineering.
The action items appearing on the agenda are to:
• Receive and file the Staff Report and Summary.
• Receive, file and approve Final Supplement No. 1 as being prepared
in compliance with CEQA.
• Adoption of the resolution certifying the Final Supplement No. l .as
required by CEQA; and making certain findings; adopting a statement of
overriding considerations; adopting mitigation measures and monitoring
plan; and authorizing filing of a Notice of Determination, as required
by CEQA.
-14-
November 14, 1990
13: REPORT OF THE CONSERVATION. RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE.
`../ The Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee met on October 25,
1990. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on its deliberations and
recommendations for consideration by the Boards.
14: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING.
., The Executive Committee met on October 24, 1990. Enclosed for the
Directors is a written report on its deliberations and recommendations for
consideration by the Boards.
15: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING.
The Fiscal Policy Committee met on October 30, 1990. Enclosed for the
Directors is a written report on its deliberations and recommendations for
consideration by the Boards.
16: ACTIONS RE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1990-92 SERIES A CERTIFICATES OF
PARTICIPATION ISSUE.
This item is discussed in the Report of the Executive Committee's
October 24, 1990 meeting, and the Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee's
October 30, 1990 meeting. Both reports are enclosed with the supporting agenda
material .
17: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BUILDING COMMITTEE.
The Building Committee met on October 30, 1990. Enclosed for the
Directors is a written report on its deliberations and recommendations for
consideration by the Boards.
18: APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONTROL CENTER/OPERATIONS
AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING. JOB NO. J-23-1.
On November 9, 1988, the Directors approved a professional services
agreement with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers to design a new Control
Center/Operations and Maintenance Building, Job No. J-23-1. The 25,000 square
foot building will be the hub of all maintenance and control activities and will
replace the existing outdated and undersized Control Center which has been in
operation for 39 years. The building will contain training rooms,
conference facilities, operations and maintenance division's supervisors'
offices, shower and locker rooms, lunch room, control center, computer room, and
a facilities/equipment plans and catalog library. All monitored functions in
both plants will be relayed to the new control center where the staff will
observe and control all critical aspects of the Plant's operation as well as
those of outlying pump stations. (Under separate contract the new computer
control and monitoring equipment will be installed.) The building plans and
specifications are now complete and were reviewed by the Building Committee at
their October 30th meeting.
�./ -15-
November 14, 1990
Staff recommends approval of the plans and specifications for the Control
Center/Operations and Maintenance Building, Job No. J-23-1, and authorization
for the General Manager to establish a date for receipt of bids (tentative bid
date is January 15, 1991) .
The engineer's estimate for construction of the new Control
Center/Operations and Maintenance Building is $3,200,000.00.
19: AGENDA FOR CLOSED SESSION.
From time to time it is necessary for the Boards to convene in closed
session to consider purchase and sale of real property, potential or pending
litigation, personnel matters or other matters which are exempt from public
disclosure under the California Public Records Act. In order to avoid a
situation where a closed session is needed but does not appear on the agenda,
this standing item is placed on the agenda each month providing for a closed
session at the regular meeting, if deemed necessary by the Boards.
DISTRICTS 7 AND 14
33 AWARD BAKER FORCE MAINS FROM MAIN STREET PUMP STATION TO BRISTOL
STREET. CONTRACT NO. 14-1-2.
The Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Baker Force Mains and Fairview Relief
Sewer, Contracts Nos. 14-1-1, 14-1-2 and 6-12, respectively, will serve District
No. 14 and portions of Districts 6 and 7. The projects include the construction
of force main sewers and gravity trunk sewers from the Main Street Pump Station,
located within the "clear zone' of the John Wayne Airport, to Reclamation Plant
No. 1 in Fountain Valley. A 90-inch sewer is planned between the Fountain
Valley Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Fairview Road, an 84-inch trunk sewer between
Fairview Road and Bristol Street, and dual 42-inch force mains between Bristol
Street in Baker Street and the pump station. The project will benefit all three
Districts (6, 7 and 14) by providing the lowest cost construction per unit of
capacity possible.
The first portion of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Contract No. 14-1-1B,
covering the construction of the trunk sewer between Bristol Avenue and Fairview
Road is complete. Contract No. 14-1-1A, between Reclamation Plant No. 1 and
Fairview Road, is currently awaiting acquisition of several easements necessary
for its construction.
On April 11, 1990, the Directors approved an agreement with the County
of Orange relating to the acquisition of permanent and temporary easements
through John Wayne Airport property for the construction and operation of
portions of the Baker Force Mains, Contract No. 14-1-2, which includes the force
main construction between Bristol Street and the Main Street Pump Station. The
project was designed with two force mains to minimize long-term pumping costs
while providing the reliability of a second conduit should one conduit ever
fail . Included within this two-mile long project is a tunnel under the San
Diego Freeway on the west side of airport property.
-16-
November 14, 1990
On October 23, 1990, 15 bids were received for Baker Force Mains, from
Main Street Pump Station to Bristol Street, Contract No. 14-1-2. The bids
ranged from a high of $7,999,850.00, to a low of $5,773,395.00, submitted by
Mladen Buntich Construction Co. A complete bid tabulation is attached to the
supporting agenda material .
Staff recommends award to Mladen Buntich Construction Co. for their low
bid amount of $5,773,395.00. The engineer's estimate for Contract No. 14-1-2
was $7,000,000.00.
-17-
-- .RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 13
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
d ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
1CBAA ELLIB AVENUE
F O.Box 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFOANIA 82720-8127
\� O1A1882.2A11
October 25, 1990
REPORT OF
CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: October 25, 1990 - 5:30 P.m.
COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF MEMBERS:
Present: Present:
John C. Cox J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
William D. Mahoney Charles Nichols, Conservation,
Peer A. Swan Reclamation and Reuse Manager
Edna Wilson Robert J. Ooten, Asst. Supt. ,
Grace Winchell Operations
Carolyn Bruskin, Principal
Environmental Specialist
Jo Rlak, Principal Environmental
Specialist
Absent: Others Present:
Henry W. Wedaa, Chairman Clark Ide, Assistant General
Richard B. Edgar Counsel
Carrey J. Nelson
Iry Pickler
CURRENT WATER CONSERVATION ACTIVITIES !Salmon attachment)
Using the enclosed summary of Current Water Conservation
Activities, staff reviewed the status of implementation of
interim water conservation studies and measures and development
of the District's Long-Term Water Conservation Program including:
1. Status of a prior STATE/EPA Clean Water Grant and the
water conservation element of the grant;
2. Phase I water conservation activity with the City of
Anaheim including a hotel/motel retrofit program;
3 . Phases II, III and IV for expanding the retrofit
program;
4. A summary of activities on the individuals retrofit
program.
Ift/ 1 of 4
w
Conservator, Reclamation & Reuse Committee Report
October 25, 1990. -
Staff is implementing the initial elements of the program in
accordance with existing authority and continuing to develop
final recommendations for the remaining phases of the Long-Term
Water Conservation Program for consideration by the Directors.
CURRENT SLUDGE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES (Green attachment)
Status Update
The staff reported on current sludge production and
distribution. The discussion focused on current sludge
management activities and the needs for diversity and cost-
effectiveness in types of sludge reuse and agreements.
Consideration of Phase I1 Sludge Management Implementation
Plan
At the Committee' s September 27 meeting staff reviewed the
proposed Phase II Sludge Management Implementation Plan in
considerable detail, following which the Committee directed �../
staff to finalize for the Committee's consideration, the
following:
(1) Phase II Sludge Management Implementation Plan;
(2) Anticipated consulting services requirements to
carry out the plan; and
(3) The additional in-house staffing requirements to
administer the plan.
Staff reviewed the final Phase II Sludge Management
Implementation Plan as summarized in Exhibits 8 through 12,
attached to the Current Sludge Management Activities (green)
summary and reported on the resource and scheduling needs to
fulfill the goals and objectives outlined in the Districts '
Master Plan. Staff reported on 16 ongoing and proposed new
projects and a ranking of these projects from high to low
priority.
Staff also summarized the timing and needs for proposed
added staff resources in the Conservation, Reclamation and
Reuse Division and professional consulting services
assistance required to achieve the objectives of the final
Phase II Sludge Management Implementation Plan.
2 of 4
Conservation, Reclamation & Reuse Committee Report
October 25, 1990.
Recommendation
The Committee recommends the following actions:
(1) Approval of the Phase II Sludge Management
Implementation Plan;
(2) Authorization for the Selection Committee to
solicit proposals, in accordance with the Boards
adopted procedures, for initial consulting
services to commence implementation of the Phase
II Plan for consideration by the Board;
(3) Authorization to add one Principal Environmental
Specialist ($3 ,419- $4 ,444 per month current
salary range) to the Conservation, Reclamation and
Reuse Division to provide a staff position to
administer the Districts' sludge management
program.
CURRENT WATER RECLAMATION ACTIVITIES(Blue attachment)
�../ Using the enclosed summary of Current Water Reclamation
Activities, staff presented information on a number of ongoing
water reclamation activities including: federal legislation
concerning the Southern California Water Reclamation Backbone
System; state legislation concerning Water Quality Control Plans
and Title 22 regulations for ground water recharge and surface
irrigation with reclaimed water, and proposed AB 1312 that now
has become Proposition 148 on the November ballot.
The staff also discussed the potential water reclamation
treatment plant sites in the Fullerton and Anaheim areas. Three
potential sites were reviewed including a site owned by Waste
Water Disposal Company, located in the City of Fullerton in the
vicinity of State College Boulevard and Orangethorpe Avenue, a
site known as the Crescent Basin site located in Anaheim near the
I-5 and Brookhurst Ave. , and a site owned by the Unocal
Corporation, located in Fullerton near Bastanchury Road and Brea
Boulevard. Staff developed a scope of work for a brief study to
evaluate the feasibility of these three sites, shared the scope
with the City of Fullerton staff, and expects the study costs to
be shared with the Unocal Corp.
The Boards have previously initiated the CEQA environmental
process for the Waste Water Disposal Company site in order to be
3 of 4
Conservation, Reclamation & Reuse Committee Report
October 25, 1990.
\/
prepared for continuing the site acquisition process (also
previously approved by the Boards) when action is required. A
mitigated negative declaration was prepared and circulated to
interested persons and agencies for comment and approved by the
Directors on October 10, 1990. Appraisals have been conducted
and the landowner is revising a draft purchase agreement. Staff
expects a response from the landowner in the near future.
Staff reported on the resource and schedule needs to fulfill the
goals and objectives of the Water Reclamation Program outlined in
the Districts' adopted Master Plan. Staff reported on eight
ongoing and proposed new projects and a ranking of these projects
from high to low priority.
Staff also summarized the timing and needs for proposed added
resources in the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Division.
The resource needs for the effort were presented as two
alternatives: (1) The Phased Water Reclamation Implementation
Plan; and, (2) The Accelerated Water Reclamation Implementation
Plan.
The Committee directed staff to proceed with finalization of the
Water Reclamation Implementation Plan using the phased approach _
for consideration by the Committee at its next meeting.
Next Committee Meeting
The Committee members set the next meeting for Thursday,
November 29 at 5: 30 p.m.
ref. CRR-AIR
Enclosure: Committee meeting material for 9/27/90.
4 of 4 �../
`✓ October 19, 1990
DISCUSSION OUTLINE
CONSERVATION. RECLAMATION & REUSE COMMITTEE
OCTOBER 25, 1990
I. Opening Discussion Attachments
A. Chairman's Report
II. News Clippings White
III. Current Water Conservation Activities Orange
A. State/EPA Clean Water Grant Status
B. City of Anaheim Hotel/Motel Retrofit
Program - Phase 1
C. Individuals Retrofit Program
IV. Current Sludge Management Activities Green
A. Status Update
1. Sludge Production and Distribution
B. Sludge Management Implementation Plan & Phase II
Consulting Services
1. Scope, Schedule and Budget
2 . Recommendation for CRR Committee to Consider
Approval of Implementation Plan
3 . Recommendation for CRR Committee to Consider
Approval of Selection Committee to be Formed and
Request Consultant Proposals
4 . Recommendation for CRR Committee to Consider
Approval of in-house staffing requirements for the
administration of the District's Sludge Management
Program
V. Water Reclamation Activities Followup Blue
C. Waste Water Disposal Company Site
1. Acquisition Status
B. North Service Area Reclamation Facilities
C. Report on Status of Regulations, Legislation and
Funding
D. Water Reclamation Implementation Plan
1. Scope, Schedule & Budget
VI. Other Business
VII. Next Meeting Suggested; November 29, 1990; 5: 30 pm.
Ref. CRRCOMM.RPT - --
CURRENT WATER CONSERVATION ACTIVITIES
A. PRIOR STATE/EPA CLEAN WATER GRANT- WATER CONSERVATION
ELEMENT STATUS
Several years ago the Districts were awarded a Clean Water Grant
from the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Loans and
Grants Division for a sum of $1, 046, 281 as partial funding of the
cost of construction for hydraulic reliability facilities at
Treatment Plant $2 . Part of the requirements for the grant were
to implement water conservation actions by providing a water
conservation plan and implementation schedule.
After extensive discussion with the SWRCB, we have succeeded in
defining what appears to be a satisfactory water conservation
program. Staff is preparing a response to the SWRCB to be sent
by the first of November. As a condition of the grant it may be
necessary for the Boards of Directors to adopt a resolution
implementing a Districts-wide conservation program. If
necessary, staff will forward a draft resolution for Committee
consideration at its November meeting. It should be pointed out
that this water conservation program element relates only to the
grant conditions and would not necessarily reflect the Districts '
upcoming broader water conservation programs.
v
B. CITY OF ANAHEIM HOTEL/MOTEL RETROFIT PROGRAM - PHASE 1
As part of the commercial segment of the Districts' market, staff
is working with members of the tourist industry to accomplish
water conservation. Consequently, with the City of Anaheim
having a hotel/motel room population of over 18, 000 rooms, effort
was first focused on Anaheim. Discussions with Anaheim staff
were successful, resulting in a several phase program beginning
with a pilot demonstration project.
Proposed is a cooperative agreement with the City of Anaheim, The
Metropolitan Water District (MWD) and the Disney Corporation in a
hotel/motel retrofit program to test the effectiveness of using
ultra low-flow toilets (ULFT) . The test program will meter the
water supply and effluent discharge for 300 hotel rooms
retrofitted with ULFT that use 1.6 gallons/flush or less and will
use 300 additional rooms of the same hotel with standard 5 to 7
gallons/flush tanks as a control group.
This is the first demonstration of its kind using ULFT' s in a
commercial application such as the hotel industry. We expect the
data results to show a dramatic decrease in water consumption and
therefore a decrease in sewer flows. A second part of the
demonstration will retrofit an 80-unit motel with ULFT and ultra-
low flow showerheads (ULFS) . '
The overall program design is in four phases. Phase I, described
in detail in Exhibit 1 will demonstrate the use of ULFT's and
showerheads in a hotel. The demonstration is expected to begin �...
on November 1, 1990, and the Districts portion of the expenses
are expected to be $13,700 of the total initial project costs of
$44, 720. MWD, Disney and Anaheim will share in the balance of
the expenses.
Results from Phase I will be evaluated to verify the water and
sewerage savings resulting from the toilet and showerhead
retrofit. Prior to any continuation of future project phases,
staff will determine that the retrofit program is cost-effective
for implementation by the Sanitation Districts.
Phases II, III, and IV propose expanding the retrofit program to
the full complement of 18, 000 hotel/motel rooms in Anaheim and to
Anaheim residents. Completion of all phases could require 2 to 3
years. Exhibit 2, 3 , and 4 outline these possible project
phases. We would also hope to expand the program, if successful,
to other cities.
C. INDIVIDUALS RETROFIT PROGRAM
The Districts ' water conservation policy recommends:
• Actively foster and promote water conservation;
• Develop cooperative programs with other public agencies
to provide public education, community use of water-
saving devices, amend plumbing codes, and other
appropriate changes to help reduce water usage.
To achieve the Districts's water conservation goals, eight major
steps are being taken. These steps include:
1. Survey existing water conservation programs in orange
County to determine what 's in place and where gaps
exist, Exhibit 5.
2. Survey existing water conservation programs throughout
the state and nation to determine what has been tried
and what works.
3 . Evaluate conservation devices using demonstrations,
Underwriters Laboratory Certifications, Consumer
Reports testing and other water agency experience.
4 . Evaluate political and institutional factors affecting
conservation implementation.
5. Develop information, education and media projects to
boost water conservation.
6. Evaluate water conservation alternatives for the
Districts' implementation using the attached evaluation
matrix, Exhibit 6.
7. Implement meaningful, cost-effective water conservation
measures in the Districts' service area.
S. Monitor water conservation results.
As an example of one element of a possible individuals retrofit
program, staff prepared an Action Plan for distribution of up to
10, 000 conservation kits. Exhibit 7 suggests the actions,
schedule and costs for such a pilot program that is part of the
afore mentioned construction grant conservation program element.
We are developing a procedure to do this on a pilot basis in
neighborhoods that can be monitored to enable a determination of
the effectiveness of alternative approaches.
Accomplishments to-date include completion of Task 1 and the
initiation of work on the remaining tasks. During the November
Committee meeting, staff will provide more detailed scope,
schedule and budget information to the Committee.
v
Exhibit 1
Phase )
ACTION CATEGORY SCHEDULE RESPONSIBILITIES COSTS VERIFICATION
Retrofit 300 rooms of a hotel In ULFT 10/1119_: CSDOC, Approximately 300 rooms Program representative will
Anaheim with ultra low-flow toilets Phase I Meeting with CSDOC, City of Anaheim $100 ULFT Rebate visit hotel site and inspect
(ULFT). City of Anaheim, &Disney Corporation product Installation In each
Disney Corporation and MWD. Total Program Cost= $ 30,000 room before open to the
Monitor and meter Incoming water guests.
use and outgoing sewer flow. Draw up copperative agreement.
Compare with 300 room control 10/15/90-10/22/90:
group of the same makeup. Review draft agreement by
At the and of the year, analyze councal manager and legal
results of cost savings for water and sewer fees, allons saved, � �[9Q
etc.and prepare !net report. 'K' ick-o "meeting,part to
announce the formation of a
Announce report findings to the committee to fund and support
Department of Water Resources the program. Prepare media
(DWR),other cities and water release and speaker's bureau
retailers. material.
1]LLQ:
Start of program.
Retrofit 80-unit hotel with ULFT In ULFT 10�/90:
joint retrofit hotel/motel Phase I Meeting with CSDOC, City of CSDOC. Appproximately 80 rooms Program representative will
demonstration program in Anaheim and MWD. City of Anaheim, $3.00 a showerhead visit hotel site,Inspect
cooperation with the City of Draw up cooperative agreement and MWD 1 per room- $ 240 products installed and
Anaheim, and Metropolitan Water prepare a room-by-room
District(MWD) 10/15/90-10/22/90: $100 ULFT Rebate Inventory.
Review draft agreement by 1 per room= $ 8,000
general manager and legal CSDOC,
council. City of Anaheim, Total Expense= $ 8,240
and MWD
11/i/90: Total Program Cost= $ 14,720
Kick-off meeting,party to
announce the formation o1 a CSDOC,
committee to fund and support City M Anaheim,
the program. Prepare media and MWD
releases and speaker's bureau
material.
1111/90:
Start of Program
CSDOC,
/ 0: City M Anaheim,
Complete en of Initial and MWD
demonstrationLion project.
12/1/91:
Prepare and execute
agreements between funding CSDOC, 1
participants City of Anaheim
( and MWD
1 Etc, -t 2
Phase II
ACTION CATEGORY SCHEDULE RESPONSIBILITIES COSTS VERIFICATION
Expand hotel/motel retrofit ULFT 12/1/90: CSDOC, Appproximately 1,720 rooms Program representative will
program to Include all hotels and Phase II Start of Phase II City of Anaheim, $3.00 showerheads visit hotel/motel sites and
motels in the City of Anaheim 10%retrofit program and MWD 1 per room= $ 5,160 Inspect the products Installed
and prepare a roam-by-room
Approximately 150 hotels and 12/1/90: inventory
motels Select:lighting consultant, City of Anaheim $100 ULFT Rebate
lighting contractor,toilet supplier 1 per room= $172,000
Approximately 1,720 rooms and execute any necessary
contracts Total Material Cost= $177,160
Offer retrofiting with$100 ULFT
rebates,and free showerheads for 1 5/90: Total Program Cost= $318,200
10%of their rooms. Complete the development of all GSDOC and
necessary computer models to City of Anaheim
Program is a 6-month test quanitry water,sewer,lighting,
program with Phase III t follow air conditioning and common
immediately area savings
12115/90:
Prepare and complete program CSDOC,
announcements,program fact City of Anaheim,
sheets,letter to customers,news and MWD
releases,customer agreement
forms,and inventory forms
12/15190:
Complete the development of City of Anaheim
computer models to track
Phase ll &fit of program*is.
date letter mailed to customer
and date customer responded)
112191:
Begin implementation of Phase II CSDOC,
City of Anaheim,
and MWD
Exhibit 3
Phase III
ACTION CATEGORY SCHEDULE RESPONSIBILITIES COSTS VERIFICATION
Expand hotel/motel retrofit ULFT 6r1/91: CSDOC, ApDproximate)yy16,000 rooms Program representative will
program to offer customers to Phase III Begin implementation of City of Anaheim, $3.00 shower heads visit hotel/motel sites and
retrofit rest of units by off sting Phase III and MIND 1 per room= $ 48,600 inspect the products Installed
cash incentives. and prepare a room-by-room
inventory
Approximately 150 hotels and $50 ULFT Rebate
motels 1 per room= $ 810,000
Approxlmatelyl6,000 rooms Total Expense= $ 853,600
Total Program Cost= $1,118,600
I I 1
EX( 14
Phase IV
1:
ACTION CATEGORY SCHEDULE RESPONSIBILITIES COSTS VERIFICATION
Implement an"Adopt a Showerhead 10/1/90: CSDOC and Population appproximately Customer returns
Showerhead Program"In the City Phase IV Program development City of Anaheim, 100,000,50,000 residences pre-addressed,postage pald
of Anaheim along with a genuine verification postcard back to
adoption certificate for all single 12/l/90: $3.00 showerheads the City of Anaheim with
and multi-family residences Develop an work( enuine 2 per family= $300,000 notation on card that if the
adoption certll'icatell and person does not Install the
brochures showerhead to please return
$.50/certificate It so someone else can
2/1/91: 1 per room= $ 25,000 "adopt'It
Artwork to printer
Total Expense= $325,000
4 11.
Artwork back from printer Total Proaram Cost= $325,000
4/15/91:
Prepare packages
5/1/91:
K�ickk-ofP news media release
and party of City Hall.
M5/
ism ule ion cerheate along
with adoption ceners, i to all
parks,nature centers, city and
public buildings to coincide with
Water Awareness Month
EXHIBIT 5
LIST OF COUNTY-WIDE WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAM
WNX n'£ Cs C E 4 E � •••�
tilt Mltt
ON
<n. or RARu
tul OF Ret
CITY N ...pRX
CITY .1 TOXIN ANS. y
RL COAN'..".
CITY .1 Rno.
ISY Ctl WIFX C0.1
SIII.1 FOUNTAIN XPLID SY Jvw 1.1N
CITY Or INLt.IP NAN,OpaUNXT M1Jlwee In IXe—P.
1II1 Or WWEX ROVF
1111 Or FAU IINO101 RACX 4 tp I.PITY I.IN.—,X.
CITY Or IXNIR
CIO Or IAOUNA StRX L.Wu N.N WRr Obnlei
CITY ON lA NATO
CITY ON IA NI..A �-
1111 OI lA PALM
CITY Or LOS ALANIIR Sa. C.1. V.Iv C..
CIII Of .1.1 IAC. Ik Q..Ilan
-II .I A
CITY R OXANR
SIII OI PURNIIX
CITY Or SAXIA ANA t r
CITY .1 1E.L RR. I—.-I—.
CITY OF TUSTIN * #.
CIO R VILLA PM[ } Sen.n Irtp lT-
OlRtltt
CITY Or RSINI.SIIX # �.
1111 Or raR LI10N �.
Win pT.Clts
NLo
1 1
EL POULT.
.IT .O
INPUT. . 11 01 ApEXNI ct
SOIIM [O.SI WIEX OISIpICI
IpW pilot vm m
EXHIBIT 6
CONSERVATION ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS EVALUATION MATRIX
Type of Conservation Cost Possible $/GAL Impact on Reliability Performance Community
Quantity CSDOC Acceptance
Saved Facilities
A. Municipal
1. Fire Fighting
2 . Plumbing Code
revisions
B. Residential -
. 1. Retrofit devices
- a. Ultra low-flow
toilet (ULFT)
b. Ultra low-flow
showerheads
c. Toilet tank
displacement
bags
2 . Pricing
3 . Landscape
ordinances
C. industrial
1. Waste
Minimization
Program
D. Education
1. Educational
program with
local schools
2. Educational
videos
3. Tours
4 . Speakers Bureau
5. Brochures
ref: f:wp\3530\Carolyn\ccrmtg
d._ .Olt 7
Possible Individuals Retrofit Program
ACTION CATEGORY SCHEDULE RESPONSIBILITIES COSTS VERIFICATION -
Provide water conservation kits to Conservation 12/3190- 12/10/90, CSDOC and water 10,000 kits @$7/kit Customer returns
all cities in the Sanitation Districts' kit Advertise for bids ppurveyyors,i.e. pre-addressed, postage paid
service area. MWDOC,Coastal Total Program Cost= $ 70,000 verification postcard back to
MESA Consolidated Deliver kits to water purveyors CSDOC.
Distribute through water Receive Ids
purveyors,i.e. MWDOC, Coastal Total Program Cost= $149,000
MESA Consolidated. 1/11�: for water purveyors to distribute
Submit agenda item to residences
Include in the kit:
2 ultra low-flowtank displacement
saceme t bags
Board a
2 toilet lank displacement bags Board approval
2 leak detection dye tablets
4/ /91:
Suggest each city apply fora Awara and receive materials
conservation credit with MWD to
offset cost of program 5/91:
Distribute kits during Earth Week
Initial purchase Is 10,000 kits "Water
for installation ess during
"Wafer Awareness Month
concurrent with City of
Anaheim's"Adopt a Showerhead
Program"
October 19, 1990
CURRENT SLUDGE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
A. STATUS UPDATE
During the quarter ending in September 1990, the Districts
produced 54,866 wet tons of sludge residuals. For the period,
there were an average of 37 truckloads per day, 5-days per week.
The residuals were managed by the four contractors working for
the Districts. These contractors recycled about 44 percent and
combined about 56 percent with municipal refuse in a landfill in
Los Angeles County.
At the October Board meeting, the Directors adopted an agreement
amendment to the Pima Gro contract for beneficial agriculture
reuse. Staff is implementing this change that will increase the
recycling percent to approximately 65%.
11
B. PHASE II SLUDGE MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
1. Scope. Schedule and Budget
At the Committee meeting of September 27, 1990, staff
reported on current sludge production and distribution. The
discussion focused on current sludge management activities
and the needs for diversity and cost-effectiveness in types
of sludge reuse and agreements.
Staff reported on the resource and schedule needs to fulfill
the goals and objectives outlined in the Districts' Master
Plan. Staff reported on 16 ongoing and new proposed
projects and a ranking of these projects from high to low
priority. Staff summarized the timing and needs for
proposed added resources in the conservation, Reclamation
and Reuse Division including professional services
assistance required to achieve the objectives. During the
meeting the Committee directed the staff to finalize the
Phase II Implementation Plan, the consulting service needs
and the in-house staffing requirements to administer the
program.
Staff summarized the Phase II Sludge Management
Implementation Plan into a series of exhibits. These
exhibits include:
Exhibit 8: Listing of the 16 sludge management
projects and priority,
Exhibit 9: The schedule for implementing the
projects,
Exhibit 10: The estimated capital costs to implement
the projects,
Exhibit 11: The estimated annual staff and
consultant manpower costs anticipated
over the next 5 years,
Exhibit 12: The estimated annual operating expenses
for the program, and
• Attachment 1: A summary of the Phase II consulting
service needs over the next 5 years.
2. Consideration of Phase II Sludge Management Implementation
Plan
In accordance with the Committee's request, staff has
finalized the Phase II Sludge Management Implementation
Plan. Exhibits 8, 9, 10, it and 12 constitute a summary of
this Plan. These exhibits shall be considered working
documents that may change over time as conditions warrant.
As such changes occur and for specific contract actions,
staff would expect to seek Committee approval.
Staff is recommending for approval the Phase II Sludge
Management Implementation Plan as expressed in Exhibits 8,
9, 10, 11 and 12.
3 . Consideration of Phase II Consulting Services
In accordance with the Committee's request, staff finalized
the outline summary scope of work to assist in carrying out
the Phase II Sludge Management Implementation Plan.
Attachment 1 constitutes this outline summary scope of work.
Staff will prepare appropriate detailed scope of work for
said services for the selection process in accordance with
the Boards' established procedures.
Staff is recommending for approval the Phase II Consulting
Services summary as expressed in Attachment 1.
4. Consideration of In-House Staffing Requirements
In accordance with the Committees' request, staff finalized
the in-house staffing needs for administering the Districts'
sludge management program. Staff estimates that one
additional person is needed immediately to inspect and
manage the Districts' private sludge contractors; initiate
the Districts' effort to acquire a local site; oversee the
Coyote Canyon Landfill amendment and Central Valley
agriculture fertilization projects; and begin composting and
chemical fixation demonstrations. Over time as conditions
warrant, the programs staffing requirements may change. As
A.
these changes occur, staff would expect to seek Committee
approval.
Staff is recommending for approval the Phase II In-House
Staffing by adding one full-time individual. The
recommended classification is Principal Environmental
Specialist ($3,419- $4,444 per month) . Addition of this
position would round out the near-term staffing needs of the
Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Division, as follows:
Positions Classification
1 Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse
Manager
3 Principal Environmental Specialist
1 - Sludge Management Program
1 - Water Conservation Program
1 - Water Reclamation Program
1 Secretary
5
ref: 030192.rp
V
4�
EBEIBIT Q
4
SLUDGE MANAGEMENT PROJECTS YRIOAITI2ATION p0.0p
ap�ah��
O O4 qva ?°a ;4vah �a� o pp4a2h0 ��
yv'S' j44 ? C4 A` O°04 hFaO p4�y4' �w✓
q 4, ~ i i 04 Toy 04
4 b44 4ya4'C°J;~°00y�6a�p.�04yhy
A°hF 4°'v�� ' .phG 0
4 v R h o h s v tQ ti+ppg' y1'oh ,44 i�4h3opyt
00 °°hg rho hQa�apc4 4a° ..
nAn PRIORITY -
1 Devel./Impl. a a a a z s s
Private Conti.
Mgt. Plan
2. On-Site z z z a z z a x
Compl.
3. Devel. z z Z a z x
Coyote Canyon
Soil Amendment
4. Fed./State x a a a a
Legisl.
Liaison
"B" PRIORITY
S. Sludge Qual z a x x x a x
Quant. Monit.
6. New Options z z a a
& Technology
7. Co-Compost a z a a
In-County
S. Acquire a x a x x
Local Site
9. Central Val z z z z z
Agri. Fart.
"C" PRIORITY
10. Trans. Sys a a x
11. Mechanical a x a x
Compost System
12. Chemical a z x a
Fixation Demo.
13. Regional a x
Planning/Coord
14. In-plant a x x
Reuse
15. Waste-To- a a x ice.
Energy Bioconv
Development �as�
16. Other R&D x x x
E( 3IT 9
PROPOSED SLUDGE MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION
PLAN SUMMARY SCHEDULE
89 1 1990 1 1991 1992 1998 1994 1995 1B '
ID Name
1 Develop end Implement Private Contracts
Management Plan
2 On-Site Compliance
8 Develop Coyote Canyon Landfill Soil
Amendment
4 Federal And Stale Legislative Liaison
5 Sludge Quality & Quantity Monitoring
&Initiatives '
8 New Options & Technology
7 Co-Composting In County
8 Acquire Local Districts Site
9 Control Valley Agricultural Fertilisation
10 Transportation Systems Evaluation
11 Mechanical Composting Demonstration
12 Chemical Fixation Demonstration
18 Regional Planning & Coordination
14 In-Plant Reuse
15 Waste-to-Energy Biomass Conversion
18 Other R&D
Protect: Critical ® NoncAliral O Milestone
Dale:
EXHIBIT 10
SLUDGE MANAGEMENT ESTIMATED CAPITAL
ecEMIRD xn 2-Exlsrwo CONCFI'IMTION UY118
PRDIECf CDSIOINO WPIEYEMATON 8CNFOULE
1Etllmtlb Cam N 1Mauba of E0Wn1
OATS PRO Cl
MIX) COST FLSCAL YMR ENDWO FNEYEARWCREME12T5
W ®ENRLA
INMO MW SERV FOOU IM IN, 1PP2 1m 101)4 1005 Im 1w Im 1m 2000 m01- 2 mil- mib
may 2010 201S 20m
MINT
SLUDGE 0I54'(154
C WSTDEM STMTMPLANF Im 0.001 2.IM fl m
COMPOST FAC411Y 2002 W."') FAIO 17Aa0 LT+O
LANDAfl115DION 1000 V.000 a= -
LA MILD ELOPEMEMPMSEI m% mF00 2M 2,674 IOAIO IOA16 S.M
LANOFOLME LOPELENTPMSEO m11 lsb 12,250 5,1m
EUIPMEMMRCMSE PNA$E1 2001 0.400 a."
EOIIIPMEIN PUMMSE PMM II 2011 0150 2,150
..9 'PS1L vLva 2,700 6,300 az,000 va .,na ISO.. aa,aso aa,Yao v,aYa s,no
Y
t
EXHIBIT 11
ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL STAFF & CONSULTANT MANPOWER COSTS
(Estimated Costs in thousands of dollars)
Item of Work 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995
Staff Cons. Staff Cons. Staff Cons. Staff Cons. Staff Cons.
1. Develop and Implement Private $21 $0 $39 $0 $39 $0 $39 $0 $39 $0
Contracts Management Plan
2. On-Site Compliance 2 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0
3. Develop Coyote Canyon Landfill 14 5 12 5 6 0 4 0 4 0
Soil Amendment
4. Bederal & State Legislative 9 r 16 20 15 5 15 0 15 0
Liaison
5. Sludge Quality & Quantity 4 2 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0
Monitoring & Initiatives
6. New Options & Technology a 40 11 20 11 40 13 40 6 0
7. Co-Composting In-County 8 10 6 5 9 0 9 0 7 0
8. Acquire Local Districts' Site 8 150 44 250 44 250 44 250 44 400
9. Central Valley Agricultural 10 15 19 10 16 10 14 5 14 0
Fertilization
10. Transportation Systems Eval. 0 0 0 0 3 20 1 0 0 0 0
11. Mechanical Composting Demo. 0 0 13 70 12 30 1 9 15 12 15
12. Chemical Fixation Demonstration 0 0 0 0 7 40 7 10 0 0
13. Regional Planning & Coordination 2 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
14. In-Plant Reuse 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
15. Waste-To-Energy Biomass Convers. 2 0 2 5 3 20 5 20 8 0
16. Other R&D 0 0 1 5 1 5 5 5 4 5
TOTALS $91 $227 $173 $390 $174 $420 $172 $345 $161 $420
EXHIBIT 12
SLUDGE REUSE
ESTIMATED AVERAGE ANNUAL OPERATING EXPENSES
(Estimated Costs in thousands of dollars)
Item of Work Estimated Average
Annual Cost
1. Contract Haul & Reuse/Disposal $5,300 n
Operations
�.✓
z. Staff Manpower 154
3. Consultant Manpower 360
Total $5,814
Note: The annual contract haul and reuse/disposal operations
estimate for fiscal year 1990/91 based on sludge
quantities equal to 220, 000 wet tons of sludge. These
annual expenses are expected to increase in-line with
increasing sewage flows, treatment effectiveness and
inflation.
ATTACHMENT 1
SUMMARY OF PHASE II CONSULTING SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
1. Provide assistance related to the Coyote Canyon Landfill
Soil Amendment project including coordination with
interested entities; development of project implementation
plan; creation of contract specifications meeting needs of
MOD; and assistance with project start up, monitoring and
close out.
2. Provide assistance related to Federal and State Legislative
Liaison including analysis of EPA 503 Technical Regulations
to be issued in October 1990, May 1992 and May 1993 ; and
analysis of State studies, policies and regulations proposed
in response to AS 1820 and other legislative actions
affecting the Districts sludge management program.
3 . Provide assistance related to New Options and Technology for
sludge management including development of standardized
proposal requests/responses for vendors interested in
working with Districts; analysis of existing proposals
compared to current operations; assistance drafting the
Districts' 3-year and 10-year sludge management operations
strategy report; collecting information on summarizing and
assessing sludge management technologies; and assistance
drafting the sludge management technology annual report.
4. Provide assistance related to Co-Composting In-County
including an international survey of co-composting
technology and programs; coordination with interested
entities; and assistance with the project implementation
plan.
5. Provide assistance related to acquiring a local Districts'
site including development of siting criteria, needs,
options and concepts; site reconnaissance and availability
determination; community relations and public information;
site characterization and screening; site implementation
plans; site CEQA; site permitting; site acquisition
negotiations; and site predesign.
6. Provide assistance related to the Central Valley
Agricultural Fertilization project including site
implementation plans for demonstration and full-scale
projects; project feasibility analysis; field data
collection; project CEQA; project permitting; contract
specifications; and project start up, monitoring and
closeout.
7. Provide assistance related to EvaluatingSludge
Transportation Systems including analysis of available
options compared to current operations; and determining the
feasibility of alternative transportation technology.
S. Provide assistance related to the Mechanical Composting
Systems Demonstration including a survey of technology and
programs; coordination with interested entities; project
implementation plan; and project feasibility analysis.
9. Provide assistance related to Waste-To-Energy Biomass
Conversion including an international survey of biomass
conversion technology and programs; analysis of available
options; project feasibility analysis; and project
implementation plans for demonstration and full-scale
projects.
10. Provide assistance related to Other Research and Development
of sludge management options.
Ref. CRRCOMM.ATT
�l
October 19, 1990
CURRENT WATER RECLAMATION ACTIVITIES
The Districts' Master Plan, "2020 VISION, adopted in July of
1989, established long-term goals for water reclamation that
include:
• constructing and operating three new upstream water
reclamation plants;
• continuing to provide secondary effluent for
reclamation
• continuing cooperation with other water agencies; and
• developing new reuse markets to maximize reclamation
In total, the proposed projects would amount to 48 mgd of
additional water reclamation. These projects are summarized as
follows:
• Crescent Basin - 25 mgd
• Seal Beach - 13 mgd
• Forebay - 10 mgd
The majority of the water reclaimed by these three plants would
be injected into the groundwater either for seawater intrusion
barrier or to replenish groundwater drinking supplies.
Additionally reclaimed water would be used for landscape
irrigation and commercial/industrial applications.
A. WASTE WATER DISPOSAL COMPANY SITE
During the latter part of 1989, staff was informed of the
availability of a new potential water reclamation plant site
owned by the Waste Water Disposal Company (WWDC) . The 5.74-acre
parcel is located near the intersection of Orangethorpe and State
College Boulevard in Fullerton. Staff evaluated the feasibility
Bf this site for a water reclamation plant and compared it to the
proposed Crescent Basin project, concluding that the WWDC site
was a highly desirable site. In May of 1990 the CRR Committee
endorsed further site acquisition activities.
Since that time, the Districts have completed a real estate
appraisal for the property and .conducted preliminary purchase
negotiations. In August, 1990, the Districts received a copy of
`,/ a proposed sale agreement for the WWDC site. The agreement was
reviewed, revised and returned to WWDC for amendment. The - -
Districts expected to receive another agreement version by
October 15, 1990. The document has not been received at the time
of this writing. ,
Staff began the CEQA environmental process on behalf of the
Districts for the WWDC site in order to be prepared for
continuing the site acquisition process when action is required .
A mitigated negative declaration of significance was prepared and
circulated for comment by interested persons and agencies. At
the October 10, 1990 meeting of the Boards of Directors, the
Boards approved the projects mitigated negative declaration.
B. NORTH SERVICE AREA RECLAMATION FACILITIES
During August of 1990, the developer, Unocal, began the planning
process for a new golf course and residential development in
Fullerton near the intersection of Brea Boulevard and Bastanchury
Road. The Fullerton staff suggested that water reclamation
facilities could be a part of the development. Over the past 2
months staff has conducted meetings with the City of Fullerton,
the developer, MWD and the Orange County Water District (OCWD) .
Staff recommended to the City of Fullerton that an initial
feasibility study be performed to compare this project site to
the WWDC and Crescent Basin sites.
The City of Fullerton met with developer Unocal to discuss water
reclamation opportunities. The developer responded positively
and tentatively agreed to assist in financing the feasibility
study. A letter has been drafted to the developer to formalize
their agreement of donating approximately $10, 000 toward the
feasibility study.
C. REGULATIONS . LEGISLATION AND FUNDING STATUS
Regulations and Legislation
Guidelines governing water reclamation and reuse in
California are established by various regulatory bodies and
consider both public health and environmental issues. Water
reclamation and reuse in California is regulated primarily
by:
- California Department of Health Services (DHS)
- County Health Departments and,
- Regional Water Quality Control Boards.
Exhibit 13 is a summary of water reclamation treatment
requirements by type of reuse, while Exhibit 14 indicates �-
the current status of water reclamation legislation. .�
The Districts' staff and consultants are preparing a concise
summary of regulations and legislation pertaining to water
ad reclamation and reuse. This document entitled "CSDOC 1990
Water Reclamation Digest - Regulations, Legislation and
Funding" will appear in the November Committee package.
Funding Assistance
State, Federal and local entities are attempting to develop
funding opportunities to assist in water reclamation project
implementation. Funding mechanisms presently available to
reclaiming entities include:
- Federal Programs
- State Loans
- Local Funding Options
Exhibit 15 presents a summary of water reclamation funding
options for the Orange County area.
Federal Programs
Two Federal programs, HR. 5028 and S. 2657 were
concurrently introduced by Congressman Packard and
�./ Senator Bradley to support water reclamation in the
southwest through funding and technical services. The
full funding potential of this legislation is as yet
unknown.
Congressman Bereuter introduced HR. 4913 to provide
funding for groundwater management and water quality
control projects with an allowable estimated project
cost of up to $50 million. Emergency short term
projects could have estimated allowable project costs
of up to $2 million.
A popular Federal funding opportunity available for
water reclamation projects is the Bureau of
Reclamations ongoing program to fund flood control and
fish and wildlife/recreation projects. This program
was originally geared to predominantly agricultural
related projects. However water reclamation projects
can be eligible simply by having an agricultural
component, such as agricultural irrigation reuse.
Wetlands is currently an attractive type of project to
receive funding.
State Loans ,
Proposition 148 on the November ballot would provide
$95 million for low-interest loans for water
reclamation projects.
State Revolving Fund (SRF) is another low-interest loan
program. Roughly $150 million is available in the SRF,
basically on the first come, first serve basis. It is
expected that funds from this program will be fully
committed by mid-1991.
Local Funding Options
MWD has studied cost savings of developing local water
supplies rather than importing water to Southern
California from Northern California. MWD currently
provides a rebate to agencies sponsoring a local
project. At present this rebate is set at $154 per
acre-foot of reclaimed water used to displace a demand
on MWD water. Local water reclamation projects are
prime opportunities for MWD funding.
D. WATER RECLAMATION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
The Districts' current water reclamation activities include on-
site irrigation and ground water recharge for a seawater
intrusion barrier through OCWD that averages 9 mgd.
In July of 1989, the Board of Directors adopted a 30-year Master
Plan with long-term reclamation goals that include:
- Providing secondary effluent to OCWD for reclamation and
seawater intrusion barriers.
- Constructing three upstream water reclamation plants.
- Networking with other water agencies.
- Developing reclaimed water markets.
The Master Plan evaluated 18 possible treatment plant locations
and selected three as priority sites:
- Crescent Basin 25 MGD
- Seal Beach 13 MGD
- Forebay 10 MGD
These projects were further evaluated for their cost
effectiveness and compared to the price of water from MWD.
In total, these three projects are expected to produce 48 MGD of
reclaimed water. The water reclaimed from these facilities would
es be used primarily for groundwater recharge and seawater
intrusion. Market studies have determined other uses are
feasible such as irrigation for golf courses, parks, cemeteries .
and greenbelts.
1) SCOPE. SCHEDULE & BUDGET
Background
Reclamation of wastewater for reuse in lieu of potable water
has been studied and practiced for over 50 years in
California. During that time there have been more than 350
safe and reliable water reuse projects in California with no
known detrimental health effects. Staff concludes that well
designed and managed wastewater reuse is a safe and reliable
means of extending Southern California's water supply.
In addition to the current water reclamation use in the
Districts ' service area, excluding the Irvine Ranch Water
District (IRWD) , previous planning studies have shown there
is the likely demand for up to 62 mgd of reclaimed water.
Recent market studies indicate that the reclaimed water
market may be substantially greater than previously
estimated. Also, being in the fourth year of a drought has
focused considerable media and community attention on water
a.i issues, thereby effecting significant community and
political support for water reclamation activities. Staff
concludes that the timing for implementation of a water
reclamation program is most favorable.
Water Reclamation Priorities
To respond to the Districts' goals and the opportunity for
water reclamation implementation, staff identified eight
projects to either continue or initiate as listed in Exhibit
16. These projects were prioritized using a ratings system
of "A" , "B" and "C" . An "A" project was of immediate
priority while a "C" project, although also very important
to the Districts' , has the advantage of longer lead times to
reach completion.
The criteria used to prioritize these projects were as
follows:
• Improve Community Aesthetics
• Delay Jeopardizes Community Support
• Augment Water Supply
• Environmental Impact
• Cost Effectiveness
v • Schedule Impact
• Regulatory Constraints
• Districts Only
• Market Opportunity \/
Exhibit 16 indicates that both the Fullerton and Crescent
Basin projects are subject to schedule impact. In these
cases unless action is taken to implement the reclamation
facility, the Districts face the possibility of losing the
sites. However, by taking decisive action to implement
these projects, the Districts will be taking positive steps
toward augmenting the water supply, that in turn will effect
a positive environmental impact, improve community
aesthetics, avoid jeopardizing community support, take
advantage of market opportunities and gain program cost-
effectiveness. For these two projects it would not be
required to proceed simultaneously and over-extend the
Districts' resources.
The three level "A" projects include: 1) the Fullerton
Reclamation Plant; 2) the Crescent Basin Reclamation Plant;
and 3) the Seal Beach Reclamation Plant. Between 8 and 9 of
the 9 criteria are attributable to each of these projects.
"B" projects were identified as: 4) OCWD Water Factory 21;
5) Wetlands Enhancement; and 6) orange County Reclamation-
Implementation Task Force. The "C" projects were listed as
7) In-Plant Reclamation; and 8) New Technology and
Alternatives.
Issues
To accomplish the work outlined in the 8 projects, a project
plan was developed identifying goals, a project summary and
the expected results; it documents the major tasks needed to
complete the work; proposes a schedule and cash flow;
identifies the manpower needs in terms of staff and
consultants; and lists known issues that may potentially
influence the projects. Typical known issues are technical,
environmental/CEQA, regulations/permits, political/community
and land use.
Scheduling
During past discussions of the water reclamation
implementation program, the Committee identified the need to
evaluate two implementation approaches. The first approach,
known as the Accelerated Implementation Schedule, was
developed by staggering the three reclamation plant projects
to start at 3-year intervals. Staff believes this to be the
fastest possible and feasible approach to the major
projects. Using this approach the 3 plants would be
completed by the year 2000.
The second approach, known as the Phased Implementation
Schedule, was developed by starting the three reclamation
plant projects sequentially, one after the other. Using
this approach, the three plants would be finished by the
year 2005
Capital Costs
From the Master Plan, Volume 3, staff summarized the
estimated capital project costs. Exhibits 17 and 18
indicate that over the next 10 to 15 years the Districts
forecast costs of approximately $352 million to $391 million
for the three reclamation facilities. The lower cost is
associated with the accelerated schedule while the higher
cost is associated with the phased schedule. These cost
estimates are preliminary and subject to change depending on
further project evaluations and changes in federal and state
regulations. Exhibit 17 summarizes the accelerated
implementation project cost, while Exhibit 18 indicates
project costs for the phased plan. The cost difference of
over $39 million is due to the effect of inflation at 5% per
year over an additional 5-years.
Additional Staffing/Consulting Requests and Costs
�../ A preliminary estimate of staff and consultant manhours was
prepared for the program. These costs would be in addition
to the estimated capital costs of the reclamation plan.
Exhibit 19 is the result of detailed project planning for
each project. The estimates indicate that considerably more
manpower could be required for the Districts to evaluate,
develop and implement the reclamation projects. It was
assumed that each individual reclamation plant would require
its own project manager. Based on these preliminary
estimates it would be necessary to add, for the accelerated
implementation schedule, one new full-time staff to the CRR
division immediately followed by a second staff person in
three years. The first additional personnel would be a
project manager for the proposed reclamation facility. The
second would be an Environmental Specialist needed to work
closely with OCWD and other agencies on the Water
Reclamation Implementation Task Force, In-plant Reclamation
and the Wetlands Project.
In the case of the Phased Implementation Schedule staff
estimates it would be necessary to add one full-time staff
to the Division to assist in managing the reclamation plant
projects, water marketing and community relations and
liaison.
In addition to CRR Division Staff, consultants will be
needed to accomplish the water reclamation goals. The
majority of the consulting services will be required for the
water reclamation facilities. As much as $6 million in
consulting effort may be needed during the 15 year period
ending 2005. It is difficult to accurately forecast both
expenses and timing. Therefore it is important to note that
these are preliminary estimates to be finalized after more
detailed analyses have been completed.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The proposed water reclamation implementation plans will be
reviewed at the Committees' October 25 meeting. Following
the review and Committee discussion, it would be appropriate
for the Committee to:
1. Direct staff to finalize the Phased or Accelerated
Water Reclamation Implementation Plan for consideration
by the Committee at its next meeting.
2 . Direct staff to finalize the consulting services
request to carry out the Phase II Reclamation
Implementation Plan and to prepare appropriate scope of
work for said services for the selection process in
accordance with the Boards' established procedures.
3 . Direct staff to finalize the in-house staffing '
requirements for the administration of the Districts
reclamation program and report back to the Committee.
ref: 030190 . rp
CSDOC 1990 Water Reclamation Digest -
Regulations, Legislation and Funding
EXHIBIT 13
SUMMARY OF WATER RECLAMATION TREATMENT REQUIREMENT
BY TYPE OF REUSEt't
Bacteriological
Type of Reuse Trratmeat Requirement Quality'°)
Irrigation of Food Crops (Spray Oxidized, coagulated, coed, 21 per 100 ml
Irrigation) filleted,disinfected
litigation of Food Crops (Surface Oxidized,disinfected 22 per 100 nil
litigation)
Irrigation of Fodder, Aber and Seed Primary effluent —
Crops
Irrigation of Milking Animal Pasture Oxidized, disnfected 23 per 100 ml
Landscape Irrigatianru (Limited Oxidized,disinfected 23 per 100 ail
Public Access)
Landscape Irrigauon`O (Extensive Oxidized, coagulated, clarified, 22 per 100 nil
Public Access) filtered,disinfected
ad Recreational Impoundments (Limited Oxidized,coagulated, clarified, 2.2 per 100 nil
Body Contact) filtered,disinfected
Groundwater Recharge Cox-byr hasis case-by-cue basis
Commercial Toilet Flush Oxidized,coagulated, clarified, 21 per 100 ml
filtered, disinfected
Guidelines presented in this table are genemBy acceptable, however DHS and RWQCB may revise due
to specific ehemnsmnces.
° 7-day median values for total coliform Most Probable Number.
` Examples of limited public access are cemettries,freeway landscapes and golf courses with no adjoining
residential areas.
d Examples of extensive public access are parks,playgrounds,school yards and golf courses with adjacent
residences.
CSDOC 1990 We= Reclamation Digest -
Regulations. Legislation and Funding
EXHIBIT 14
STATUS OF WATER RECLAMATION LEGISLATION'
Legislation Issue Status
State
Proposition 148 S95 Million Bond On November ballot
(AB 1312)
SE 1765 Sunnyvale Loan Deleted from budget
ACR 106 Review of SWRCB Procedures Passed; Signed
AB 2681 DWR Office of Water Reclamation Withdrawn
AB 2217 Cahn ins Easements Passed; Signed
SB 2688 Prohibition of Source Coniml Ordinance Withdrawn
Proposition 128 California Environmental Protection Act On November ballot
Federal
HR 5028/5057 BuRec Studies Introduced
S 2657 BuRec Studies Induced
HFI 4913 Ware Beciarnation Funding Introduced
Status as of October 1990.
CSDOC 1990 Water Reclamation Digest -
Regulations. Legislation and Funding
EXHIBIT 15
SUMMARY OF WATER RECLAMATION FUNDING OPPORTU,TTIES
Entity/Opportunity Type of Funding Status
Federal
Bureau of R=L:unauon
• HR 5028/S 2657 Funding for Local Studies Proposed
• HR 4913 50 Percent Gant for Water Proposed
Reclamation Pardons of Project
• Small Project Program Loans and Grants for up to$31.1 Ongoing
Million
Clean Water Program 12-1/2 Percent Maturing Funds as Pao Ongoing
of S='s SRF -
State
SWRCB - Water Reclanmuon Low-Interest Loans for 100 Percent of Ongoing
Loan Program Design/Consnuction up to SS Million
SWRCB - Sute Revolving Fund Low-Interest Loans for up to $45 Ongoing
Million
Lod
Metropolitan Water District - Rebate of$154/acre-foot of Reclaimed Ongoing
Local Projects Program Water Used
MWD-member Wholesale Water Rebate of Avoided Costs Potential' Not Ya
Entities Proposed
WATER RECLAMATION PROJECT PRIORITY LIST
EXHIBIT ilf,
U' M ,a h E M
Na, ~ y $
E¢ yN Cy W 4 N aR U S a
UU �, A� 3R z 4 H E O
W N I
yq O W p a F
a q 7U N coT N k
a' PROJECT M O 4 fy S y a OJq
A FULLERTON X X X X X X X X X
A CRESCENT BASIN X X X X X X X X X
A SEAL BEACH X X X X X X X X
B OCWD WATER ' X X X X
FACTORY 21
B WETLANDS- X X X X -
ENHANCEMENT
PROJECTS
B ORANGE COUNTY X X X X
RECLAMATION
IMPLEMENTATION
TASK FORCE
C IN PLANT WATER X X X
RECLAMATION
C NEW TECHNOLOGY X X X
& RECLAMATION
ALTERNATIVES
• EXHIBIT IY
RECLAMATION FACILITIES ESTIMATED CAPITAL
PROJECT COSTS AND ACCELERATED IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
(Estimated Costa in thousands of dollars)
Itmw ul Ilatu 1•roject FISCAL YEAR ENDING FIVE YEAR INCREMENTS
Hurl: reyd Coat
in 0 ENRLA 1990 19,11 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1990 2000 2001 2006 2011 2016
serY 6000 2005 2010 2015 2020
k.+c l......tLm 1991 3,500 1,050 2,450
eqU i::itiwl
R�clnm..t iun 1995 62,000 620 5,580 21,700 21,200 12,400
1•Innl Ilu. I
1<ec I na.,t i„U 1997 129,810 1,949 11,035 45,440 45,440 25,966
Plant
IucL�n�+I bni uu T-o :
827 4,813 19,832 19,832 11,326
59,840 46,26J 30,999 19,832 19,832 11,326
I, 1tl6 4,gbll 20,)46 41,""/IO 97,506 65,098 45,461 30,959 32,306 19,367
Jpl Ln n.n
EXHIBIT 18
RECLAMATION FACILITIES ESTIMATED CAPITAL
PROTECT COSTS AND PHASED IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
(Estimated Coats In thousands of dollars)
Item of Date Project FISCAL YEAR ENDING FIVE YEAR INCREMENTS
Work reqd Cost
in @ ENRLA 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1990 2000 2001 2006 2011 2401(.
SerV 6000 2005 2010 2015 2028
Reclamation 1991 3,500 1,050 2,450
Plant site
Aquisition
Reclamation 1995 62,000 620 5,580 21,700 21,700 12,400
Plant No. 3
Reclamation 1997 129,830 1,949 11,035 45,440 45,440 25,966
Plant
No. 4
Reclamation 2006 56,630 56,630
Plant No. 5
Grand Total 251,960 1,050 1 3,030 1 5,580 1 21,300 1 21,700 12,400 1,949 11,035 45,440 45,440 25,966 56,630
@ 5 Percent 391,277 1,102 3,385 6,460 26,376 23,689 16,616 2,742 16,299 70,477 74,022 44,402 101,707
Inflation
I I I I J
REF: 030174.1RP
EXHIBIT 19 '
ESTIMATED MANHOUR RESOURCES
PROJECT: WATER RECLAMATION PROJECTS
NUMBER TASK DESCRIPTION STAFF CONSULT. DIRECT DESCRIPTION OF ASSUMPTIONS &
COMMENTS
1. Fullerton 8, 466 3 ,555
2 . Crescent Basin 8, 466 3 ,555
3 . Seal Beach 8 , 466 3,555
4 . OCWD Water Factory 21 1, 100 290
5. In-Plant Reclamation 3 ,460 9,730
6. Orange County Reclamation 1,955 195
Implementation Task Force
7 . Wetlands Enhancement 194 247
Project
S. New Technology & 523 816
Reclamation alternative
TOTAL 32, 630 21,943
RE: AGENDA ITEM NO, 14
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
al ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
October 24, 1990
IOBCA EWE AVENUE
AO.SO.
0127
MOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 9272E-9127
(71A19112-2411
REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: October 24, 199 - 5: 0 p.m.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: STAFF PRESENT:
Present: ,. J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
Blake Anderson, Dir. of Tech. Services
Buck Catlin Joint Chairman Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering
William Mahoney Vice Joint Chairman Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Don R. Griffin Past Joint Chairman Ed Hodges, Sr. Facilities Manager,
Richard B. Edgar Past Joint Chairman Maintenance
Norman E. Culver Past Joint Chairman Bob Ooten, Assistant Superintendent,
James Wahner Chairman, District 1 Operations
Richard Polls Chairman, District 3 Patricia Gorczyca, Financial Manager
Evelyn Hart Chairman, District 5 Jim Wybenga, Source Control Division
Ruthelyn Plummer Chairman, District 6
.Dan E. Smith Chairman, District 7/Past JC
Grace Winchell Chairman, District 11 OTHERS PRESENT:
Hank Wedaa Chairman, District 13
Peer A. Swan Chairman, District 14 Director John Cox
Roger Stanton County Supervisor Director James Neal
Clark Ide, Assistant General Counsel
Absent: Beth Jines, DOHS
Mark Leary, DOHS
Iry Pickier Chairman, District 2 Neal Cline, SAWPA
Don Roth County Supervisor Jeff Bower, Merrill Lynch
Steve Coma, Merrill Lynch
Sam Corliss, Merrill Lynch
1) Stringfellow Interim Discharge Permit Extension.
The interim Stringfellow discharge permit authorized by the Boards of
Directors and issued by the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) to the
State Department of Health Services (DOHS) and the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) expires on December 31, 1990. The permit allows a limited volume
of groundwater extracted from the Stringfellow waste disposal site in Riverside
County to be discharged through the Santa Ana River Interceptor to the Districts'
sewerage system following pretreatment and testing for compliance. A 3-year
permit was originally authorized by the Directors in 1984 and a 3-year extension
was approved in 1987. At the Committee's April 25, 1990 meeting, representatives
of DOHS, EPA and SAWPA briefed the Committee on the status of the Stringfellow
cleanup project. The permittee(s) have requested an additional 3-year extension
pending completion of the remaining studies relative to the long-tern disposal
alternatives for Stringfellow.
The staff and Committee reviewed the enclosed report (tan) on the proposed
extension of the Stringfellow interim discharge permit. Staff recommended the
requested 3-year extension with modifications to the monitoring program to
reflect the experience in administering the Stringfellow discharge to the SARI
system; and that staff be allowed to return the SARI line to Plant No. 2 to
better accommodate the Districts' operational needs.
(1 of 4)
Executive Committee Report
October 24, 1990
The Chair also recognized Beth Jines, representing DOHS, and Neil Cline,
representing SAWPA, who commented on the Stringfellow cleanup program and urged
the Directors to give favorable consideration to the requested actions regarding
the Stringfellow permit extension. Beth Jines also distributed the enclosed
"Stringfellow Update".
Recommendation: The Committee discussed at considerable length the
Stringfellow cleanup program, its goal of preserving the underground fresh
water supplies of the upper (Riverside/San Bernardino Counties) and lower
(Orange County) Santa Ana River Basin, and the role of the Districts in the
cleanup effort.
The Executive Committee recommends:
a) That the staff be authorized and directed to authorize the Santa Ana
Watershed Project Authority to issue an extension of the interim
California Department of Health Services (DOHS) permit to December 31,
1993, for discharge of pretreated groundwater from the Stringfellow
Waste Disposal Site to the Districts' sewerage system, and providing
that said extension be subject to continuing satisfactory progress
by DOHS and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in addressing
the long-term cleanup solution for Stringfellow; and,
b) That the conditions of said permit be modified as recommended by
staff and Counsel to remove duplicate language and reorganize the
sequence of its sections; and changing the inspection and monitoring
requirements from daily to once for the discharge of each tested- ,..
and-approved, sealed effluent tank is discharged, or on a daily
basis, whichever is less frequent.
The Committee also authorized and directed staff to prepare a separate
report on the proposal to return the Santa Ana River Interceptor sewer to
Plant No. I for consideration by the Committee at a future meeting.
2) Consulting Services re Preparation of Air Toxics Emissions Inventory
and Health Risk Assessment Report to CoL",Iy With AB 2588, California
Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Information and Assessment Act of 1 87.
The necessary tasks to comply with the California Air Toxics "Hot Spots"
Information and Assessment Act of 1987 are being conducted in several phases.
The Boards have previously authorized work totaling $850,000 to comply with
provisions of AB 2588. This includes the services of a consultant to prepare
the initial inventory and source testing plan and participation in the Pooled
Emission Estimation Program (PEEP) with other California POTWs for source
testing common to all wastewater treatment plants. The next phase of the
required work is preparation of an emissions inventory report and a health risk
assessment report. -
Staff reviewed the enclosed report (salmon) recommending that the
Selection Committee be authorized to negotiate a professional services agreement
with James M. Montgomery Engineers for the next phase, to prepare the required
(2 of 4)
Executive Committee Report
October 24, 1990
emissions inventory report and health risk assessment report. James M. Montgomery
Engineers is uniquely qualified to perform this work because of their ongoing
statewide project work on air toxics, including work performed for PEEP, at a
considerable cost savings. Once the agreement is negotiated it will be returned
to the Directors for consideration.
Recommendation: The Executive Committee concurs with the staff
recommendation.
3) Status Report re Industrial Waste Discharge Permit for Printed Circuit
Board Facility at 2249 South Yale Street, Santa Ana, for United
Pharmacy, Inc. , dba Universal Circuits.
As the Directors are well aware, there has been a rather protracted series
of administrative hearings and judicial proceedings concerning the Districts'
non-renewal of the Universal Circuits, Inc., (UCI) industrial waste discharge
permit for a printed circuit board manufacturing facility at 1800 Newport Circle,
Santa Ana, (which is now closed down) ; and the denial of a permit to UCI for a
new facility at 2249 South Yale Street, Santa Ana.
The South Yale Street facility has now been acquired by United Pharmacy,
Inc. , dba Universal Circuits. Staff reviewed the enclosed report (buff) on the
status of this facility and the staff's intent to issue an industrial waste
discharge permit to United Pharmacy, Inc. , the new owner.
The Assistant General Counsel also reviewed the enclosed memorandum
(goldenrod) concerning the status of litigation between the District and UCI
concerning these facilities.
Staff and Counsel advised that these reports were status updates only and
no action was required.
4) Status of Purchase of Surface Easements and Subsurface Oil and Mineral
Rights at Treatment Plant No. 2.
In July the staff reported to the Executive Committee on the need to
purchase surface easements and subsurface oil and mineral rights at Plant No. 2,
that precede the Districts' acquisition of the site, in order to proceed with
necessary master plan treatment plant expansion projects. In August, upon
recommendation of the Committee, the Boards acted to: (1) authorize the
General Manager and General Counsel to offer to purchase in the amount indicated
In appraisals, all the necessary oil facilities, leases and mineral rights; and
(2) authorize the General Counsel to institute eminent domain proceedings against
any operator or leaseholder to acquire such sites or rights, if necessary; and
(3) authorize the solicitation of proposals for the preparation of plans and
specifications for the abandonment and removal of the oil facilities. Enclosed
are Exhibits "A" (grey) and "B" (light green) depicting the sites.
(3 of 4)
Executive Committee Report
October 24, 1990
Staff reported that since the Boards' action, the crisis in the Middle East
and its impact on petroleum products has exacerbated our attempts to negotiate
an agreement for purchase of the surface easements and subsurface oil and
mineral rights and that the acquisition costs would increase substantially.
Staff and Counsel are continuing negotiations and will keep the Directors
apprised of any developments.
5) Fiscal Policy Committee Recommendations.
Fiscal Policy Committee Chairman William Mahoney reported that the
Committee met on October 17th. He reviewed the Committee's deliberations and
- recommendations which are detailed in the enclosed separate report of the Fiscal
Policy Committee, dated October 17, 1990, and its supporting documents. The
recommendations are summarized as follows:
A. Amending Engineering and Scientific Intern Program.
The Committee is recommending that Resolution No. 90-26, approving the
Engineering and Scientific Intern Program, be amended to increase the
authorized annual amount from $60,000 to $105,000, to allow additional
part-time employment of some interns during the regular school year.
B. Initial Debt Issue re 112020 VISION" Financing Program (Capital
Improvement Program, 1990-92 Series A Certificates of Partcipation).
The Committee recommends the following actions relative to the initial
debt issuance (Capital Improvement Program, 1990-92 Series A
Certificates of Participation) pursuant to the Boards' approved
long-term financing plan:
1. Approve issuance of $100 million variable rate certificates of
participation with a 25-year maturity as the first of two planned
issues in 1990-91, with the second issue to be In the spring of
1991 ($63+ million of this issue would replenish reserves for
1989-90 Capital Outlays).
2. Authorize staff and Counsel to negotiate and execute a contract
with the Industrial Bank of Japan (IBJ) , Limited, for letter of
credit (LOC) bank services. (Note: IBJ subsequently withdrew
their proposal and the Committee is recommending that National
Westminster Bank PLC be appointed - see Fiscal Policy Committee
Report of October 30, 1990 meeting).
3. Authorize staff and Counsel to negotiate and execute a contract
with Texas Commercial Bank for trustee services.
The financing team will report further on the proposed program at the
November 14 Joint Board Meeting.
JWS:sc
Enclosures
(4 of 4)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
4f ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
October 17, 1990 10 oaax 8127 L
\� REF# 091346.RP MOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728.8127
17141902-2411
STAFF REPORT
REQUEST FROM CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES
FOR STRINGFELLOW PERMIT EXTENSION
The purpose of this report is to provide the Directors background information
and the current status of the Stringfellow site, present a request by the
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) and the California Department of
Health Services (DOHS) to extend the permit for the discharge of treated
groundwater from the site until December 31, 1993, the staff's analysis of the
request, and the staff's recommendation to extend the permit for an additional
three years.
STRINGFELLOW BACKGROUND
The Stringfellow site was operated as a hazardous waste disposal facility from
1956 to 1972. It is located in the middle of a narrow box canyon one-half
mile north of Highway 60 in Riverside County near Glen Avon (see Attachment
1).
Approximately 34 million gallons of liquid industrial waste from Los Angeles,
Orange, and other surrounding counties were deposited at the site. Included
in this amount were spent acids, caustics, solvents, pesticides, cyanides, and
metal compounds. The site was eventually closed when it became apparent that
liquid waste was percolating from the waste pits into the groundwater and that
a plume of contaminated groundwater was migrating down-canyon toward the
community of Glen Avon and into the Chino Basin, endangering the underground
fresh water basin. Mitigation measures began in 1980 with the draining and
minor excavation of the open disposal pits and covering them with a clay cap.
Also included were concrete diversion channels that intercept surface flows
and divert them away from the site.
In November 1984, the Districts' Boards of Directors authorized SAWPA to issue
a three-year permit to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and OOHS for
the discharge of treated groundwater extracted from the Stringfellow hazardous
waste dump site into the Districts' sewerage system via the Santa Ana River
Interceptor (SARI) . SAWPA owns capacity in the Districts' system. The
purpose of the contaminated groundwater extraction project is to help protect
the underground fresh water supplies in both the upper (Riverside and San
Bernardino Counties) and lower (Orange County) Santa Ana River Basin.
�s
1
Discharge from the treatment plant serving the site commenced in December 1985
after the completion of the pretreatment plant and effluent storage tanks.
The Boards of Directors ordered the SARI trunkline sewer to be diverted to
Plant No. 2. to assuage any public concern that the Stringfellow treated
effluent may have any affect on the Districts' effluent from Plant No. 1,
which, in part, is used by the Orange County Water District for reclaimed
water. Daily analysis of the treated groundwater has shown that the discharge
is consistently in full compliance with the stringent limitations of the
discharge permit issued by SAWPA and authorized by the Districts. The plant
is currently operating at approximately 20,000 gallons per day. The interim
permit allows up to 187,000 gallons per day.
In 1987, the Districts authorized SAWPA to extend the permit to December 31,
1990 in anticipation that a Record of Decision (ROD) by EPA specifying the
selected long-term alternative for remediation and delineating the Districts'
proposed involvement in the cleanup would be finalized by then.
DOHS STRINGFELLOW FEASIBILITY STUDY REPORT
In June 1988, the DOHS issued a report entitled "Stringfellow Draft
Feasibility Study Report" (FS). The purpose of the DOHS report was to
formulate broad, alternative long-term remedial actions to prevent or minimize
the migration of contaminated groundwater from the Stringfellow site, and to .
prevent or minimize the impact of contaminants which have already migrated
from the site. The report screens the alternative remedial actions for
protection of human health and the environment; compliance with applicable or
relevant and appropriate requirements of State and federal laws; long-term
effectiveness and permanence; reduction of toxicity, mobility, or volume;
short-term effectiveness; implementability; cost; State acceptance; and
community acceptance. The report was termed a "working document" and was used
for discussion at community meetings involving the DOHS, EPA, and the public.
The staff provided the Directors with a summary of the report in September,
1988, and a follow-up review of the DOHS proposed alternative in April 1990.
LONG-TERM REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVE SELECTED BY DOHS
The long-term solution to the cleanup of the Stringfellow site addresses four
zones of contamination:
Zone 1: On-Site/Upper Mid-Canyon Area
The on-site/upper mid-canyon zone includes the original disposal area
consisting of approximately 17 acres in the northern area of Pyrite
Canyon southward to about 600 feet south of the subsurface barrier wall .
On-site groundwater is heavily contaminated with a large number of
organic and inorganic contaminants including heavy metals. Zone 1 has
no residential or commercial population. Contaminated groundwater from
this zone is designated as Stream A.
2
Zone 2: Mid-Canyon Area
The mid-canyon zone encompasses the portion of Pyrite Canyon that
extends from the southern edge of Zone 1 southward to the existing set
of mid-canyon extraction wells. This zone contains a moderately to
heavily contaminated groundwater plume, but no identified site-related
soil contamination. The major contaminants are water soluble consisting
primarily of mobile, volatile organics (principally ICE and chloroform)
and inorganics (nitrates and sulfates). The groundwater contains
virtually no heavy metals. Zone 2 has no residential population and
very limited commercial use. Contaminated groundwater from this zone is
designated as Stream B.
Zone 3: Lower Canyon Area
The lower canyon zone extends from the mid-canyon extraction wells
southward to the lower canyon (freeway) groundwater extraction system
that is being constructed across the plume just north of Highway 60.
This zone contains low to moderate groundwater contamination.
Contaminants primarily consist of mobile, volatile organics (principally
TCE and chloroform) and inorganic sulfate and nitrate compounds. No
surface soil or surface water contamination related to the Stringfellow
Site was found in this zone during the Remedial Investigation. Zone 3
• contains one private residence, two active business concerns (excluding
the rock quarry), and privately owned land. Contaminated groundwater
from this zone is designated as Stream C.
Zone 4: Glen Avon Community
The Glen Avon community zone includes the area from Highway 60 southward
to the southernmost edges of the plume of contaminated groundwater
stemming from the Stringfellow Site. Groundwater contamination is the
only known present impact from the site, and is restricted to law levels
of a small number of mobile, volatile organics (principally TCE and
chloroform) , and inorganics (nitrates and sulfates). Present
contamination levels are above drinking water standards, which prevents
the use of the affected portion of the aquifer as a potable water
source. Zone 4 is densely populated. Contaminated groundwater from
this zone is designated as Stream D.
Six major alternatives were identified to address these zones of
contamination. The DOHS preferred alternative is identified as Remedial
Alternative (RA) 6, and consists of the following elements:
1. Dewatering of the on-site area using surface extraction wells to remove
a significant portion of the heavily contaminated groundwater present
on-site.
2. Implementation of soil-gas extraction if field tests prove favorable, to
remove volatile organic contaminants from on-site soil .
3
3. Treatability studies to determine whether there is a feasible method for
further addressing on-site soil and bedrock contamination.
4. Continue the existing and planned groundwater management activities for
the mid-canyon, lower canyon, and community areas. This will include
the construction of reinjection systems in the mid and lower canyon
areas, and an extraction/reinjection system in the community area.
The DOHS preferred alternative meets all of the nine Superfund evaluation
criteria and was supported by the Glen Avon community at a public meeting
covering the feasibility study on September 20, 1988. The capital cost for
this alternative is $64.7 million; however, this cost does not include the
implementation of a treatment technology for on-site soils.
DOHS and EPA have prepared their Record of Decision for implementation of the
preferred alternative and it was signed September 30, 1990 by EPA. The work
will be implemented in two phases, with the first being the dewatering of the
site, soil-gas extraction, and construction of the community
extraction/reinjection system. The second phase will be implemented following
receipt of the results of the treatability studies with the final ROD
specifying which specific method will be used to clean-up the site.
DISCHARGE OF TREATED GROUNDWATER TO SARI
The contaminated groundwater extracted from the on-site area and the mid-
canyon area is treated at the Stringfellow Pretreatment Plant prior to
discharge into the SARI line. The water is pH-adjusted, the metals are
precipitated and removed, and the water is contacted with activated carbon to
remove toxic organics. The resulting treated water is then analyzed by
pretreatment plant operators and SAWPA to ensure that the water meets the
established quality criteria. The water sent to the SARI line is a brine of
consistent quality, with significant removal of metals and toxic organics
prior to discharge. The treated water meets most of the California drinking
water standards.
Since 1985, the Stringfellow Pretreatment Plant has had no permit violations
and has treated 35 million gallons of contaminated leachate. Treatment has
resulted in the removal of the following:
0 320 pounds of cadmium.
0 10,600 pounds of chromium.
0 2,300 pounds of nickel .
o 135,000 pounds of organics.
MINIMIZATION OF TREATED GROUNDWATER TO SARI
Total flow from the on-site, mid-canyon, and lower canyon areas is currently
14,000 gallons per day. Treatment of this water at the pretreatment plant
will continue for the foreseeable future. However, DOHS has done several
things to reduce the volume of contaminated water, requiring treatment and
4
subsequent disposal to the SARI line. Construction of surface water diversion
channels, completed in May 1990, should reduce the amount of contaminated
water by preventing clean water from entering the site. The water extracted
from the lower canyon area is now being treated at the pretreatment plant, but
will be diverted to a new treatment system to be located in the lower canyon.
Construction of this new pretreatment plant will begin in 1991 and coincide
with the construction of the community extraction system. Water extracted
from the community area will be treated at the lower canyon treatment facility
and then discharged to the Jurupa Community Services Districts sewer system
and will ultimately be used for reinjection to flush the contaminants from the
soil .
SAWPA/DOHS REQUEST TO EXTEND THE TREATED GROUNDWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT
The Districts' role in accepting the treated groundwater from the Stringfellow
Site is unchanged. For the zones of contamination at the site and in the
upper canyon, treatment at the Stringfellow Pretreatment Plant and discharged
to the SARI line, are in integral part of the long-term remedy. Until
treatability studies are completed for the on-site soils, DOHS and EPA cannot
estimate how long or to what extent the pretreatment facility will continue to
treat leachate from the site. However, as noted above, the agencies plan to
discharge the treated water from the lower canyon and community areas to the
Chino III Sub-basin, thus reducing the potential load on the on-site treatment
facility and discharge to the SARI line.
Until such time as the treatability studies are completed, the second and
final ROD cannot be prepared and the final disposition of the leachate cannot
be determined. The final ROD is expected to be issued before December 31,
1993.
In a letter dated August 29, 1990, SAWPA requested that OOHS be granted
another three-year extension to the Stringfellow Discharge Permit which
expires on December 31, 1990. The SAWPA Commission approved the preliminary
three-year permit extension subject to the Districts' concurrence (see
Attachment 2) .
DISTRICTS' STAFF ANALYSIS OF SAWPA/DOHS REQUEST
Because the effectiveness of the treatment plant was unknown in 1985 and the
Boards wanted to assure protection of the public health, several stringent
permit conditions were required.
The Stringfellow Pretreatment Plant has operated in 100% compliance since it
began operation in December 1985. The average wastewater flow represents less
than two-hundredths of a percent of that treated by the Districts. There have
been no adverse effects on the Districts' influent water quality, effluent,
sludge, or treatment plant operation. The quality of the water from
Stringfellow is best illustrated by comparing it to the permit limits, the
Districts' influent wastewater quality, and the Districts' ocean discharge
limits as shown in Table 1.
5 .
TABLE 1 - Stringfellow Discharge Comparison
Stringfellow Districts'
Stringfellow Discharge Districts' 6-Month
Discharge 1989-90 1989-90 Discharge
Limits Average Influent Median Limit
Constituent mg/L mp/L mg/L mg/L
Cadmium 0.064 NO 0.0041 0.02
Chromium 2.0 0.001 0.028 0.10
Copper 3.0 0.001 0.153 0.30
Lead 0.58 0.003 0.02 0.10
Nickel 3.51 0.003 0.038 0.10
Silver 0.43 ND 0.018 0.03
Zinc 0.7 0.012 0.152 0.30
ND - Non-Detectable
PROPOSED PERMIT MODIFICATIONS
Because of this five-year history of 100% compliance, staff believes it is
appropriate to consider modifications of certain permit conditions.
Inspections
The Districts' staff has inspected the plant on a daily operating basis as
required by the permit to ensure that the plant was operating correctly and
that the discharge was in compliance with the permitted limits. At the
current well -pumping rate, each 100,000 gallon effluent holding tank at the
Stringfellow site is filled approximately once per week, sealed, tested by the
permittee and SAWPA, and then discharged over a three-day period. Since the
quality of the effluent in the holding tank does not change once it has been
sealed, staff believes there is little benefit to a daily inspection unless
the tank is filled and emptied daily. The Districts' staff proposes to
inspect and monitor the plant site once during the discharge of each effluent
tank or on a daily basis, whichever is less.
SARI Diversion to Plant 2
In 1984 when the permit was first under consideration, no scientific
evaluation had been conducted on the effects of the treated groundwater on
Orange County water reclamation practices. As a result, the Boards took the
precautionary measure of diverting the SARI wastewater (which contained the
Stringfellow discharge) to Plant No. 2, which is not a source of reclaimable
water. This diversion has an impact on the hydraulics of the Districts'
treatment works and inhibits our operational flexibility and our ability to
provide reclaimed water to the Orange County Water District. The volume of
flow discharged by Stringfellow is negligible. In fact, even at a maximum
permitted flow rate of 187,000 gallons per day, the Stringfellow discharge
represents less than 0.1% of the total wastewater flow treated at the
Districts' joint facilities, and only 0.6% of SAWPA's flow allocation to SARI:
6
Because of the hydraulic needs of our Joint Treatment Works, it is becoming
necessary to divert SARI flow back into Plant No. 1, which is a source of
reclaimable water for the Orange County Water District. The staff advised EPA
+� and DOHS of their concerns and requested that they study the effect of the
Stringfellow wastewater on our potential to reclaim water. (Plant 2 is at a
capacity with no immediate plans for expansion; and Plant 1, currently under
expansion, is sometimes flow-short and we need to process more wastewater at
Plant 1.)
Based on correspondence from DOHS and our own evaluation of the consistent
quality which meets all of the stringent discharge limitations, it is not
believed that the Stringfellow wastewater will have any effect on the water
that is reclaimed by the Orange County Water District. The staff therefore
concludes that because of the hydraulic demand of operating our treatment
plants, the consistent high water quality from the Stringfellow site, and its
negligible flow contribution, that it will not adversely impact the
reclaimable water quality from Plant No. 1 nor affect the public health and
safety, nor the quality of the reclaimable water. The Districts' staff,
therefore, requests that the Boards allow staff to return the SARI flow to
Plant No. 1.
The progress made by DOHS and EPA in developing a technical solution that
meets the regulatory requirements as well as community acceptance takes into
consideration the comments and suggestions put forth by the principle
responsible parties who had disposed of waste at the Stringfellow hazardous
waste site. The progress has been slow, but has been done in a manner to
reach consensus with all parties involved rather than taking a course of
action which may later be legally challenged, further delaying any cleanup
efforts.
The operable unit ROD has now been signed allowing DOHS and EPA to proceed
with the initial pilot studies for treatment of the on-site and mid-canyon
wastes and continue with the cleanup of the lower canyon and community area.
The proposed solutions tend to minimize any wastes that must be sewered by
treating and reusing waters that will not degrade the local groundwater
quality, thereby retaining as much water as possible within the adjudicated
upper basin.
ALTERNATIVES AVAILABLE TO THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
There are basically three alternatives in considering SAWPA's request for
extension of the permit to discharge treated Stringfellow groundwater to the
SARI system.
1) Do Not Reissue the Permit - The discharge of Stringfellow wastewater to
the SARI has minimal hydraulic and essentially no impact on wastewater
quality, either in terms of reclamation or ocean disposal , nor any
adverse effect on sludge quality. However, because of its high
salinity, it cannot be disposed of in the upper basin. Consequently, if
the Districts do not agree to extend the Stringfellow permit, DOHS and
EPA would be forced to either a) truck the waste to another POTW with an
7
ocean discharge or the ability to treat brine waste; b) transport the
raw untreated waste for treatment and disposal at a hazardous landfill
at an estimated cost of $10-25 million per year for 0.02 MGD (as a point
of reference, the Districts' operating budget is approximately 50
million dollars per year for treating 270 MGD); or c) discontinue
treatment of the leachate until such time as a cost-effective solution
not involving the Districts can be developed.
The likely consequences of not renewing the permit would be to endanger
the progress already made in cleaning up the groundwater in the Glen
Avon area, and potentially threaten the underground water supplies if
the contamination were allowed to continue to migrate toward the Santa
Ana River.
2) Extend the Permit Without Modification - When the original permit was
issued in 1985, several attachments, amendments, and letters were
attached to the permit package to provide the regulating agencies an
all-encompassing document. In some cases this resulted in duplication
of certain provisions in a rather complicated document. The original
permit also includes the requirements that the Districts' staff daily
Inspect and monitor the Stringfellow site to ensure compliance with the
discharge limits and permit conditions. This alternative is to simply
extend the existing permit.
3) Amend and Extend Permit - This alternative proposes to simplify the
existing permit by removing duplicate language, reorganizing its
sections into a logical sequence, and modifying the Districts'
monitoring (inspection) requirements as an amendment to the permit as
presented in Attachment 3. ...
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
Staff recommends Alternative 3, that the Boards of Directors approve a three-
year extension to the Stringfellow site waste discharge permit, and amend the
original permit to allow Districts' staff to monitor the site, its operations,
and effluent, in a more efficient manner that will still assure effluent
quality, public health, and that the permittee is meeting all other permit
conditions.
The staff of the Districts, SAWPA, and DOHS have worked together in proposing
this amendment which, with the exception of a modification to the Districts'
monitoring requirements, does not change the regulatory elements of the
permit, including the safeguards to assure compliance with all discharge
limitations and permit conditions. It maintains as part of the permit, the
assignment of the permit to EPA, the authorization for access by SAWPA, the
agreement for third-party claims, and letters by EPA and DOHS specifying that
the treated wastewater is not hazardous.
8 �.r
It is further recommended that the staff be allowed to return the SARI line to
Plant No. 1 for treatment. This will provide greater flexibility in operating
the treatment plants and in our ability to meet the Districts' ocean discharge
standards, while providing a reliable source of reclaimable water that meets
applicable standards.
REF 8091346.RP
9
ATTAC11k.. , 1 +
NOTHERN
Stringfellow Site Plan PITAREA
MID-CANYON • 1
WELL NO. IW3
t _ • , SOUTHERN
°� _ _ • • / PITAREA
v� LOWER CANYON ' • i !
• I ``III ' YAII/Y/((I
• • --MID CANYON
•
LOWER CANYON
WELL NO. NW-17B
GLEN AVON
• ``���� PYRITE
�i CIIANNEL
COMMONITY GLEN AVON
WELL NO. fC- 211A2 `y` ELEMENTARY
SCGOOL
Iigore 3-1 . Location of Wells Selected as Representing Average Contaminant Concentrations for Mid-Canyon, Lower
Canyon, and C.unummity.
laken from Draft Report: SlringfelloW EaCility Remedial Investigation/feasibility Study; May 30, 1986; DOIIS -
ATTACHMENT 2
3600 Tykr Sheet, Suite 207, Hioaside, CaUf.. 92503 (714) 785-5411
FAX 785.7076
COMMMIONFORTHEPNO.=M ORf
S AANA W HED CWnMN HINO '�a"�"w:ENos°11c�"
ROJECT AUTH TY MbINGEfAUNNO VATY MUNICI
GIN BFANANOINO VALLEY MUNICIML VMTFA 0137NICf
WESnENN MUNICIML VGTEN OII nNIC7
GENEML�N
NEILWNE
August 29, 1990
Mr. Wayne Sylvester
General Manager
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127
Subject: Stringfellow Permit Extension
Dear Mr. Sylvester:
On December 31, 1990 the Stringfellow/CSDOC Discharge Permit
expires. The California Department of Health Services (DHS) has
requested in writing that the permit be extended, and subsequently
the SAWPA Commission approved the preliminary three (3) year permit
extension (Commission Memorandum No. 946) subject to CSDOC's review
and comment.
In recent discussions between our staffs regarding the extension,
several issues were raised regarding the Stringfellow discharge
conditions; to wit:
1. Reduction of Flow. Since the permit was issued on January
1, 1985, California has experienced a prolonged drought, with
a corresponding drop in the amount of discharge from the site.
However, due to increased flows expected from the Glen Avon
Community wells and the eventual return of normal rainfall
patterns, SAWPA's staff has concluded it would be inadvisable
to reduce the flow limit at this time.
2. Reduction of mass limits. The stringent concentration
limits in the permit already reflect the limits in SAWPA
Ordinance ,91. We do not, at this stage, recommend a reduction
in flow, therefore the mass limits should not be changed.
3 . Compliance history. Each tank as the plant effluent
accumulates is tested in rigid compliance with the sampling
program agreed upon by SAWPA and CSDOC. Since the permit was
issued in 1985, the Stringfellow discharge has at all times
been consistently under the established limits. Attached is
a summary of the monthly discharge to the SARI.
Total lVater Qualitu Sfanagement-SAWP.4's Commitment to the Cummun8u
The data verifies that the Stringfellow Plant has been successful
in treating the contaminants leaching from the site and preventing
any further contamination of the groundwater downstream from the
site. The brine nature of the processed water dictates the need
to dispose of it into SARI, and, consequently, we seek your
concurrence on the execution of this amendment.
If you or your staff have any further questions on this matter,
please call me or William Preston.
Very truly yours,
Neil M. Cline
General Manager
Attached: DHS Letters
Monthly Effluent Discharge Summary
Amendment No. 2
Amendment No. 1
Permit
Commission Memorandum No. 946
SA.\'Zi ANA :Vi iE.RSHED PROfECT.iL' -.'CR?F
Slag Or UIfCf u AIM AND M AC AGVN G(pGF 0(URMEIUN, Gs..v
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES
ro. .ox atm
9AcrA Q. a 9. a = April 16, 1990
..r (916) 323-2945
RECEIVED
Mr. Neil Cline
Santa Ana watershed Project Authority APR 2 0 1990
3600 Tyler Street, Suite 207
Riverside, CA 92503 SANTA ANA WATERSHED
PROJECT AUTHORI iY
Dear Mr. Cline:
The State of California, Department of Health Services (DNS)
currently holds a permit for the discharge of effluent from the
Stringfellow Pretreatment Facility to the Santa Ana Regional
Interceptor (SARI) . This permit will expire on December 31, 1990.
DNS would like to begin the process of renewing this permit for the
continued discharge of effluent from the plant to the SARI line.
The current permit is held by DNS and assigned to the U. S.
Environmental Protection Agency, whose contractor operates the
facility. There have been no permit violations. Since the plant
began operation in December, 1985 through December, 1989 the plant
has treated 31,446,963 gallons of contaminated water. The
treatment process has removed from the Site:
_ 318 lbs of Cadmium
10,598 lbs of Chromium
2,310 lbs of Nickel
135,000 lbs of Organic Contaminants
The Pretreatment Plant is an important and integral component of
the cleanup of the Stringfellow Hazardous Waste Site and the
protection of the groundwater resources of the Chino Basin. The
Santa Ana watershed Project Authority has been of invaluable
assistance, from construction of the highly effective Pretreatment
Facility to approval of the effluent discharge permit. DNS looks
forward to continuing this relationship through the upcoming permit
renewal cycle.
Sincerely,
f
Mark Leary, Chief
Sprcial Projects Team
cc: Ed Ekholm, Pyrite Canyon Groun
Allen Lowe, U.S. EPA
SiAm a u�no+w�t�„M um wns�ce ♦en+cx GcoxGe ttuK.wuur+. ee.a..e
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH S(E'iRVIC�7E'�S a- -
(916) 323-2916 SEP 0 4 1990
SANTA ANA WATERSHED August 31, 1990
PROJECT AUTHORITY
Mr. Neil Cline
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority
3600 Tyler Street, Suite 207
Riverside, CA 92503
Dear Mr. Cline:
Recently, representatives from the California Department of Health
Services (DRS) provided a briefing for the board members of the
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) . During the
briefing, DHS provided a status report on the Stringfellow
Hazardous Waste Site and a report on future remedial actions. In
addition, DRS representatives were asked a variety of questions by
the CSDOC board members regarding the impacts of treated water from
the Stringfellow Site on the CSDOC facilities. The following is
a brief synopsis of the CSDOC briefing and discussion.
Status Report
Since DHS' last briefing for CSDOC, several interim remedial
actions have been implemented at the Stringfellow Site:
o A new groundwater extraction system was constructed
downgradient of the existing extraction barrier, near Highway
60. With the operation of this new system, it is estimated
that 100% of the contaminated groundwater is now captured
before it leaves the Pyrite Canyon area.
o Surface water diversion channels have been built to divert
clean water from contacting contaminated soils, thereby
reducing the amount of contaminated groundwater in the Site.
In addition, predesign testing of the Glen Avon aquifer will begin
on October, 1990 and will provide information necessary for the
design of the community groundwater extraction and reinjection
system.
Remedial Alternative 6:
In the February/March issue of the "Stringfellow Update'-
newsletter, DHS and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
proposed the implementation of Remedial Alternative 6 for public
review and comment. `/
Mr. Neil Cline
August 31, 1990
Page Two
Remedial Alternative 6 consists of the following elements:
1. Dewatering of the on-site area using surface extraction wells
to remove a significant portion of the heavily contaminated
groundwater present on-site.
2. Implementation of soil-gas extraction if field tests prove
favorable, to remove volatile organic contaminants from on-
site soil.
3 . Treatability studies to determine whether there is a feasible
method for further addressing on-site sail and bedrock
contamination.
4 . continue the existing and planned groundwater management
activities for the mid-canyon, lower canyon and community
areas. This will include the construction of reinjection
systems in the mid and lower canyon areas and an
extraction/reinjection system in the community area.
Capital cost of Remedial Alternative 6: $ 64,700, 000
(This cost does not include the implementation of a treatment
technology for on-site soils. )
DHS and EPA are preparing the first Record of Decision (ROD) for
implementation of Remedial Alternative 6. The work will be
implemented in two phases. The first phase will be dewatering of
the site, soil gas extraction and construction of the community
extraction/reinjection system. The second phase will be
implemented following receipt of the results of the treatability
studies.
Discharoe of Treated water
The contaminated groundwater extracted from the on-site area and
the mid-canyon area is currently treated at the Stringfellow
Pretreatment Plant, prior to discharge into the Santa Ana Regional
Interceptor (SARI) line. The water is pHadjusted, the metals are
precipitated and removed, and the water is contacted with activated
carbon to remove toxic organics. The resulting treated water is
then analyzed by the pretreatment plant operators and SAWPA to
ensure that the water meets the established quality criteria. The .
list of elements that the treated water is analyzed for are
substantial and help to ensure the high quality of the discharge
to the SARI line. The water sent to the SARI line is a brine, of
_ consistent quality, with significant removal of metals and toxic
organics prior to discharge.
Hr. Neil Cline
August 31, 1990
Page Three
Construction of the surface water diversion channels, completed in
May, 1990, should reduce the amount of contaminated water by
preventing clean water from entering the Site. Treatment of this
water at the pretreatment plant will continue for the foreseeable
future. Total flow from the on-site, mid canyon and lower canyon
areas is currently 12 gallons per minute.
Since 1985, the Stringfellow pretreatment plant has had no permit
violations and has treated 35,000,000 gallons of contaminated
leachate. Treatment has resulted in the removal of
318 lbs Cadmium
10,598 lbs Chromium
2,310 lbs Nickel
135,000 lbs Organics
Water extracted from the lower canyon area is now treated at the
pretreatment plant, but will be diverted to a new treatment system
to be located in the lower canyon during construction of the
community extraction system. This construction will begin in 1991.
water extracted from the system in the community area will be ...r
treated at the lower canyon treatment facility as well. Treated
water will be discharged to the Jurupa Community Services District
sewer system during predesign work, and will ultimately be used for
reinjection.
CSDOC.a Role
The District's role in accepting treated groundwater from the
Stringfellow Site is unchanged. For the zones of contamination at
the site and in the upper canyon, treatment at the Stringfellow
Pretreatment Plant and discharge to the SARI line are an integral
part of the remedy. Until treatability studies are completed for
the on-site soils, DHS and EPA cannot estimate how long or to what
extent the pretreatment facility will continue to treat leachate
from the site. The Agencies plan to discharge treated water
extracted from the lower canyon and community areas to the Chino
III subbasin.
DNS and EPA expect to sign the ROD which will begin the first phase
implementation of Remedial Alternative 6 in October, 1990.
Following the ROD, the Agencies will ask the Stringfellow
Responsible Parties (RP's) to implement the work described in the
ROD. At this time, it is likely, although not absolute, that the
Agencies will request the RP's to take over operation of the
Stringfellow Pretreatment Plant. If the Agencies decide to take
this action, SAWPA and CSDOC will be notified in advance.
Mr. Neil Cline
_. August 31, 1990
Page Four
,
I hope this synopsis is helpful in the preparation of the
Stringfellow pretreatment plant permit renewal and adequately
conveys the essential role that SAWPA and CSDOC play in remediation
of this groundwater contamination.
Sincerely,
Mark Leary, Chief
Special Projects
cc: Karen Ueno, U.S. EPA
- ATTACHMENT 3
SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY (SAWPA)
300 TYLER STREET, SUITE 207
Riverside, CA 92503
Telephone: Area Code 714 - 785-5411
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO
WASTE PERMIT
STRINGFELLOW HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE
Permit No: 101
NAME: State of California PHONE: (916) 323-2916 EFFECTIVE DATE:
Deyartment of Health Services
Tonic Substances Control Division NO. OF EMPLOYEES: M/A January 1, 1991
MAILING ADDRESS: 714/744 P Street WORN DAYS/YEAR: 260 EXPIRATION DATE:
P.D. No. 942732
Sacramento, CA 94234-7320 S.I.C. NUMBER: 4953 Dec d ar 31, 1993
SERVICE ADDRESS: Stringfellow Pretreatment Facility LOCAL SEWERING AGENCY: PERMIT FEE:
3450 Pyrite
Riverside, Calif. 925N SAWPA $250.00
INDUSTRIAL CATEGORY:
Hazardous Waste landfill
\//
DEFINITIONS
1. CSDOC - County Sanitation Districts of Orange County is a Publicly Owned
Treatment Works that is responsible for the treatment and disposal of
influent wastewater from domestic, commercial, and industrial sources.
They ultimately receive the wastestream from Stringfellow via the Santa Ana
River Interceptor (SARI) line and discharge to the ocean under an NODES
permit.
2. OHS - The State of California Department of Health Services is the
permittee for the discharge agency, the Stringfellow pretreatment facility.
3. EPA - The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is a Federal Agency which
operates the pretreatment facility.
4. SARI - The SARI system is the interceptor sewer system transporting non-
reclaimable water from the upper Santa Ana River basin to the CSDOC
wastewater treatment facilities in Fountain Valley.
1
V
, I A
5. SAWPA - Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, a Joint Powers Public Agency
in charge of issuing the discharge permit to OHS. SAWPA has purchased 8
MGD and has a 30-MGD capacity right in the SARI interceptor sewer from the
Orange County line to the CSDOC treatment plant.
6. Stringfellow Hazardous Waste Site - The Stringfellow Site was operated as a
hazardous waste disposal facility from 1956 to 1972. The site was closed
when it became apparent that liquid waste disposed at the site was
percolating into the groundwater. Discharge by wastehauler trucks to the
SARI line commenced in December 1985.
7. Stringfellow Pretreatment Facility - The DHS and EPA initiated a
groundwater pumping program to minimize the spread of contaminants from the
site into the Santa Ana River, a major source of water for Orange County.
In an effort to eliminate the land disposal and reduce handling and
disposal costs, DHS with the help of SAWPA designed and constructed a
pretreatment facility capable of removing heavy metals and organics. The
facility includes equalization tanks, lime addition, clarification, sand
filtration, activated carbon adsorption, and holding tanks.
PERMIT CONDITIONS
I. POINT OF DISCHARGE LOCATION
A. Wastewater from the Stringfellow Pretreatment System will be
transported from the effluent storage tanks by truck to the SARI
system truck disposal stations (CB-1 orW-1) located at the Chino
Treatment Plant No. 2, 16400 El Prado Road, in Chino, California or
at the Truck Discharge Station, corner of Sampson and Buchanan
Streets in Riverside, California.
II. EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
A. During the period from the effective date of the permit to the
expiration date of the permit, Permittee is authorized to discharge
treated wastewater to the SARI system. The effluent discharge shall
not exceed the following effluent limitations shown in Table 1 based
on 187,000 gallons per day (gpd) of wastewater flow.
B. The discharge must at all times be in conformance with California
Radiation Control Regulations (California Administrative Cade, Title
17) as presently in effect or as hereafter amended.
C. The permit limitations as set forth in Table 1 above shall become
effective on the effective date of this Permit. The Permittee may be
permitted to discharge flows in excess of 187,000 MGD only upon
notification and concurrence of SAWPA and subsequent amendment to
this permit.
2 ..
i s
PERMIT NO. 101
TABLE 1
EFFLUENT DISCHARGE LIMITATIONS
MAXIMUM* MAXIMUM*
CONSTITUENT mgLL LBS/DAY CONSTITUENT Mg ` LBS/DAY
Arsenic 2.0 3.12 Mercury - 0.03 0.047
Cadmium 0.064 0.100 Nickel 3.51 5.47
Chromium (Total) 2.0 3.12 Silver 0.43 0.671
Copper 3.0 4.68 Zinc 0.7 1.09
Cyanide (Total) 1.2 1.87 TTO 0.58 0.905
Cyanide (Amenable) 1.0 1.56 PCB 0.01 0.016
Lead 0.58 0.905 Pesticides 0.01 0.016
PH: 6-12
* Limitations based on criteria set forth in report entitled "Waste Discharge
Interim Treatment and Disposal Program, Stringfellow Hazardous Waste Site",
California Department of Health Services, December 1984.
D. These limitations will be revised if environmental studies, EPA
Regulations, SAWPA standards, CSDOC standards, or other factors
indicate that stricter limitations are appropriate.
E. The treatment plant is designed to treat up to 130 gpm (187,000 gpd)
of contaminated groundwater from the Stringfellow site. All
groundwater to be discharged to the SARI must receive treatment.
Only groundwater from the Stringfellow site can be processed in the
treatment plant that is to be discharged to the SARI system.
Blending of discharge tanks or other sources to meet the discharge
limits will not be allowed.
III. SAMPLING LOCATION
A. Permittee shall provide SAWPA and its agents with a representative
sampling point that is separated from the domestic waste, easily
accessible, and approved by SAWPA. The location of the sampling
point shall be at the sampling valves that connect to the two
3
. individual holding tanks. Sampling is to occur prior to pumping to
trucks for disposal to SARI system.
{
j B. Each final effluent storage tank shall be individually sampled by the
Permittee and SAWPA, and approved prior to disposal in accordance
with permit limitations before being discharged to the SARI system.
Analytical results shall be available to CSDOC on request from SAWPA.
IV. MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
A. Self-monitoring Reauirement
Permittee is required to perform a self-monitoring program and the
following applies:
1. From the period beginning on January 1, 1991 and continuing
until December 31, 1993, Permittee, at its own expense, shall
monitor the effluent in accordance with a program approved by
SAWPA and CSDOC. Based on the results, the Permittee shall make
necessary adjustments/ corrections to bring the wastewater
discharge into immediate compliance with the permitted limits.
2. Samples collected for the purpose of reporting data to SAWPA
and CSDOC shall be analyzed by the testing procedures for waste
constituents and characteristics as provided by the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 40 CFR 136, and shall
be performed by a certified laboratory approved by SAWPA.
Duplicate samples shall be made available on request by SAWPA
or CSDOC.
B. Reporting Requirements
1. A written monthly operating report covering the period from the
first day of the month to the last day of the month shall be
provided to SAWPA by the Permittee. It shall be forwarded to
CSDOC by SAWPA within 15 days of the end of each reporting
period. All sampling results shall be reported in terms of
concentration, daily mass emission rate in pounds per day, 30-
day monthly average concentration, and 30-day monthly average
mass emission rate in pounds per day. The report shall also
describe the status of all unit processes on line and standby
mechanical equipment, inventory of consumable process chemicals
and materials, operational problems, and maintenance performed
during the reporting period.
2. The results of all analyses of final effluent shall be reported
to SAWPA by Permittee for forwarding to CSDOC of the treated
water for discharge to the SAWPA/CSDOC sewerage facilities.
n
4
S
V. WASTEWATER TREATMENT OPERATORS
The Permittee agrees that the on-site operation at the interim pretreatment
facilities shall be supervised and directed by a registered professional
engineer knowledgeable in wastewater and toxic waste facilities operation
to ensure competency of operation. The Permittee shall retain an
industrial wastewater treatment operator(s) to ensure proper operation and
maintenance of the pretreatment system and maintain compliance with
discharge limitations at all times.
VI. DISPOSAL FEES*
SAWPA disposal fees to the SARI line shall be as follows*:
Basic Charge: 0-625,000 gallons/mo. _ $28,750.00 plus
Excess Flaw Charge: In excess of 625,000 gallons/mo. _ $0.017/gallon plus
Excess Flow Charge: In excess of 1,250,000 gallons/mo. = $0.012/gallon
* Adopted by SAWPA July 10, 1990, effective July 1, 1990. SAWPA reserves
the right to amend the fees and charges.
VII. PERMIT NON-COMPLIANCE
A. In the event that any results indicate that the final discharge will
not meet the discharge standards, the Permittee shall notify SAWPA
and immediately cease discharge. SAWPA will notify CSDOC of the
results and the subsequent actions by Permittee and SAWPA. In no
case shall the Permittee recommence discharge until the Permittee is
provided written authorization by SAWPA and CSDOC. SAWPA and CSDOC
will provide such written notification as soon as possible.
B. Any samples taken and analyzed by SAWPA at the truck disposal
stations which are found in excess of permit limitations set forth
herein are subject to the following non-compliance fees and
penalties.
1. $300.00 per pound for each pound, or portion thereof, of heavy
metals in excess of limitations.
2. $500.00 per pound for each pound or portion thereof, of TTO in
excess of limitations.
3. Fees outlined in B.l and B.2 above are for the first or initial
violations within a 12-month period.
C. A second violation in either the heavy metals or TTO limitations
within a 12-month period, may result in addition to the fees set
forth in B.1 and 8.2 the suspension of this Permit for a period not-
to-exceed 30 days until the Permittee can demonstrate the ability to
continuously meet permit limitations.
`o
5
D. More than three violations within a 12-month period may result in
permit revocation. In the event of permit revocation, the Permittee �.✓
may reapply for a discharge permit pursuant to SAWPA's Ordinance.
Before consideration of re-issuance of a discharge permit to the SARI
system, corrective action must be taken to ensure permit compliance.
E. Determination of non-compliance by the Permittee with permit
conditions or limitations can be made by SAWPA or CSDOC
representatives. Notice of non-compliance to Permittee will be made
by SAWPA.
F. SAWPA reserves the right to suspend or revoke this Permit for any
violations or non-compliance with SAWPA's ordinances, resolutions,
regulations, or pursuant to court order governing SARI.
G. The Permittee hereby acknowledges and agrees that SAWPA has the
authority to immediately terminate the acceptance of wastewater upon
notification by SAWPA that the effluent does not meet the requirement
limitations. This termination can be effected with reasonable notice
and without hearing to the Permittee.
VIII GENERAL CONDITIONS
A. The Permittee hereby agrees to adhere to SAWPA ordinances,
resolutions, and regulations, and the CSDOC Ordinance ("Wastewater
Discharge Regulations"), and all other SAWPA and CSDOC ordinances,
resolutions, and regulations for the use and availability of the
SAWPA/CSDOC collection, treatment, and disposal systems, including
enforcement provisions for any violation of said ordinances,
resolutions, and regulations or the provisions of this permit. Any
subsequent amendments or revisions made to the ordinances,
resolutions, or regulations of either SAWPA or CSDOC will be
automatically incorporated into this permit and Permittee agrees to
be bound by all such changes that are applicable to all . Permittees.
B. The Permittee acknowledges and agrees that since the discharge
permitted hereunder will be transported to treatment facilities
operated by CSDOC, any changes made in their requirements to SAWPA
pursuant to the basic agreement dated April 12, 1972 will be
automatically incorporated into this Permit.
C. Permittee agrees to utilize waste minimization principles and
practices regarding flow, chemicals, or otherwise reduce the
discharge to SARI whenever practical .
D. This Permit may not be assigned without the prior written consent of
SAWPA and CSDOC.
E. No vested right of any kind, including the right to discharge, shall
be acquired by the issuance of this Permit.
6
IX. INSPECTION AND SAMPLING PROCEDURES
A. The Permittee hereby acknowledges and agrees that since the discharge
permitted hereunder will be transported to the treatment and disposal
facilities of SAWPA and CSDOC, that at any reasonable time without
prior notice, and at any frequency determined to be appropriate by
SAWPA or CSDOC, representatives of SAWPA and CSDOC may inspect the
interim pretreatment facilities and take wastewater samples to ensure
permit compliance as it affects their facilities. .
B. Inspection at the Stringfellow site shall be conducted each time an
effluent tank is discharged, or daily, whichever is less. Time of
arrival shall be varied so that treatment plant operating staff
cannot anticipate the time of arrival . All inspections shall include
a check that all processes are operating in a nominal manner as
prescribed by the 0 & M Manual or by posted operational directives
from the registered professional engineer supervising the operation
of the treatment plant. On-line pH and other meters that indicate
and record process parameters will be noted for conformance with
target operating parameters established by the registered
professional engineer.
C. Periodically, grab or composite samples may be taken by CSDOC to
ascertain the performance of the system and the quality of the
effluent. Samples shall be taken in conformance with CSDOC sampling
and chain-of-custody procedures outlined in the current edition of
the -"Industrial Waste Division Policies and Procedures". Samples
will be .analyzed at the CSDOC Laboratory or at a laboratory approved
by CSDOC. Sample splits shall always be offered to the Permittee.
D. Periodic inspections and sampling at the approved disposal stations
and SAWPA's county-line metering station shall be conducted by CSDOC
to verify the adequacy of the monitoring and control measures of the
Permittee, SAWPA, and CSDOC.
X. HEALTH AND SAFETY PROTOCOLS (HASP)
A. In recognition of the potential risk posed to the health and safety
of employees, agents, contractors, and other representatives as a-
result of these monitoring activities, SAWPA has agreed to adopt a
health and safety plan for monitoring of permit requirements at the
Stringfellow site. This health and safety plan incorporates certain
requirements as set forth by the EPA, and SAWPA has entered into an
agreement with EPA regarding SAWPA's health and safety plan. This
agreement and SAWPA's health and safety plan are on file with SAWPA
and CSDOC and are incorporated herein.
B. For the purpose of the HASP, CSDOC shall be an agent of SAWPA but be
solely responsible for the certification of CSDOC personnel to be
involved in the monitoring activities at the Stringfellow site. All
personnel of CSDOC must obtain SAWPA's Safety Program Manager's
clearance before commencing work at Stringfellow.
C. CSDOC shall , as an agent for SAWPA, comply with all provisions of
HASP dated June 1, 1987, or as modified in the future. �.
XI. INDEMNIFICATION
The Permittee, for itself and its successors and assigns, hereby
specifically agrees to indemnify and hold harmless SAWPA and CSDOC and
their respective officers, agents, and employees from any and all damages,
liabilities, ,judgments, the reasonable costs of litigation, but not limited
to, reasonable attorney's fees and court costs, if any, which SAWPA and/or
CSDOC may incur as a result of the use of the SARI System by the Permittee,
which system includes the treatment facilities operated by the County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County to the extent permitted by law and to
the extent funds are appropriated and available for that purpose.
8
s e
State of California
Department of Health Services
Print/Type Name Title
Signature
United States Environmental
Protection Agency
Print/Type ame Title
Signature
Santa Ana Watershed
Project Authority
Print Type Name Title
Signature
JW:lab
REF NSTRINGFE:permit.2
9
SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY
� WASTE PERMIT
STRINGFELLOW HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE
I. NAME AND ADDRESS OF DISCHARGER:
State of California - Department of Health Services
Toxic Substance Control Division
714/744 "P" Street
Sacramento, CA 95914
2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF DISCHARGE:
(A) Effective Date of Permit - January 1, 1995
(B) Location of Origin of Discharge - Stringfellow Hazardous Waste Site, Glen
Avon, Riverside County.
(C) Location of Point of Discharge to SARIS stem: At truck disposal stations
CB-I and W-1 .
(D) Nature of Permitted Discharge: Interim treatment program for extracted
contaminated groundwaters from Stringfellow.
(E) The Discharger hereby agrees to adhere to SAWPA ordinances, resolutions
and regulations and the CSDOC Ordlnace Establishing Regulations for Use
of District Sewerage Facilities and all other SAWPA and CSDOC
ordinances, resolutions and regulations for the use and availability of the
SAWPA/CSDOC collection, treatment and disposal systems, including
enforcement provisions for any violation of said ordinances, resolutions
and regulations or the provisions of this permit. Any subsequent
amendments or revisions made to the ordinances, resolutions or
regulations of either SAWPA or CSDOC will be automatically Incorporated
into this permit and Discharger agrees to be bound by all such changes that
are applicable to all Permittees.
(F) The Discharger hereby agrees to permit SAWPA, at any reasonable time
and without prior notice, to inspect and take wastewater samples.
(G) No vested right of any kind, including the right to discharge, shall be
acquired by the issuance of this Permit.
(H) The Discharger acknowledges and agrees that since the discharge
permitted hereunder will be transported to treatment facilities operated by
the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County any changes made in
their requirements to SAWPA pursuant to the basic agreement dated April
12, 1972, will be automatically incorporated into this Permit.
12/01/83 -I-
(1) . SAWPA reserves the right to suspend or revoke this Permit forty
' violations or non-compliance with SAWPA's ordinances, resolu�,,,,.4,
regulations, or pursuant to court order governing the Santa Ana Regional
Interceptor (SARI) system. and CSDOC s Santa Ana River Intercel
sewer, jointly referred to in this permit as the "SARI"
(3) The Discharger hereby acknowledges and agrees that since the discharge
permitted hereunder will be transported to the treatment and disposal
facilities of SAWPA and CSDOC, that at any reasonable time without prior
notice, and at any frequency determined to be appropriate by SAWPA or
CSDOC, representatives of SAWPA and CSDOC may inspect the interim
pretreatment facilties and take wastewater samples to insure permit
compliance as it affects their facilities.
(K) The Discharger hereby agrees that the on-site operation at the interim
pretreatment facilities shall be supervised and directed by a registered
professional engineer knowledgeable in wastewater and toxic waste
facilities operation to insure competency of operation and meeting permit
requirements. -
M This Permit may not be assigned without the prior written consent of
SAWPA.
(M) This Permit shall expire on December 31, 1987.
(N) Fees and Charges: Disposal to the SARI line shall be as followu
Cents per Gallon
Basic SAWPA Charge 0.30
Basic WMWD Charge 0.30
(or CBMWD)
SARI O h M 0.06
Capacity Lease 0_10
1.16•
•SAWPA reserves the right to amend the fees and charges pursuant to
Section 2(E)of this permit.
(0) Other Terms and Conditions: See attachment designated as "Attachment r
for permit limitations:.
REVISED: 12/19/8S Acknowledged
SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT
t�U�iT o•7sjfy`Jy� AUTHORITY
DOSS EPA A�+S WPA
Date
eDlHARCFR.
_ - Date J2�/O/27 S By: Co)
i `ram''
12/01/85 -2-
"ATTACHMENT I"
STRINGFELLOW HAZARDOUS WASTE 517E
DISCHARGE PERMIT
GENERAL CONDITIONS:
L All permit limitations must be verified by laboratory analysis at treatment
plant site prior to disposal to the SARI system by a program approved by
SAWPA.
(a) Limitations on heavy metals mutt be verified on each day of
discharge on a 24-hour flow rated composite..
(b) Limitations on total toxic organics (TTO) must be verified on a
monthly basis, however, a daily certification must be made in
accordance with Section 413.03 of the Federal Clean Water Act
as published in the Federal Register on July 15, 1983, Vol. 49,
No. 137.
2. Any samples taken and analyzed by SAWPA at the truck disposal stations
which are found in excess of permit limitations set forth herein are subject
to the following non-compliance fees and penalties:
(a) $300.00 per pound for each pound, or portion thereof of heavy
metals in excess of limiations.
(b) $500.00 per pound for each pound or portion thereof, of TTO in
excess of (Imitations.
(c) Fees outlined in 2.a and 2.b above are for the first or initial
violations within a 12-month period
(d) - A second viloation in either the heavy metals or TTO Imtations
within a 12-month period, may result in addition to the fees set
forth In 2.a and 2.b the suspension of this Permit for a period
not-to-exceed 30 days until the discharger can demonstrate the
ability to continuously meet permit limitations.
(e) More than three viooations within a 12-month period may result
In permit revocation. In the event of permit revocation, the
Discharger may reapply for a discharge permit pursuant to
SAWPA's Ordinance. Before consideration of re-issuance of a
discharge permit to the SARI system, corrective actlon must be
taken to Insure permit compliance.
3. Sampling shall be conducted daily by the Discharger in accordance with the
program approved by SAWPA as set forth in General Conditions la and lb
above. All analyses to be performed shall be in accordance with
SAWPA/CSDOC requirements. Methods of analysis shall be in accordance
12/01/35 -1-
with the most recent edition of "Environmental Protection Agenq
Regulations on-Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants" by E➢-;-,w
CFR 136) and shall be performed by a certified laboratory approl, by
SAWPA.
4. The results of all analyses of final effluent shall be reported to SAWPA by
Discharger for forwarding to CSDOC of the treated water for discharge to
the SAWPA/CSDOC sewerage facilities.
3. Determination of non-compliance by the Discharger with permit conditions
or limitations can be made by SAWPA or. CSDOC representatives. Notice
of non-compliance to Permittee will be made by SAWPA.
6. The Discharger hereby acknowledges and agrees that SAWPA has the
authority to immediately terminate the acceptance of wastewater upon
notification by SAWPA that the effluent does not meet the requirement
limitations. This termination can be effected with reasonable notice and
without hearing to the Discharger. Discharger acknowledges that SAWPA
has the authority to suspend or revoke this permit or prohibit the discharge
to SARI/CSDOC facilities upon determination of any violations or non-
compliance with the terms and conditions of the permit upon reasonable
notice to Discharger.
INDEMNIFICATIONt
The Discharger, for itself and its successors and assigns, hereby specifically agreesoto
indemnify and hold harmless the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority and the County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County their respective officers, agents and employees
from any and all damages, liabilities, judgments, the reasonable costs of litigation, but not
limited to, reasonable attorney's fees and court costs, if any, which the Santa Ana
Watershed Project Authority and/or the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
may incur as a result of the use of the SARI System by the Discharger, which system
includes the treatment facilities operated by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange
County to the extent permitted by law and to the extent funds are appropriated and
available for that purpose.
PERMIT LIMITATIONS
1. The Initial interim pretreatment facilities are to be designed to treat O.137
MGD (130 gpm). the following permit limitations are based upon a
maximum daily discharge of 0.187 MGD (130 gpm)-
Revised 12/19/85
Acknowledged \-.l
_ DOHS EPA S PA
12/01/85 -2-
Maximum
Concentration Max. Mass
Constituent Limits mell Limits lbs./day
Arsenic 2.0 3.1
... Cadmium 0.064 0.1
Chromium (total) 2.0 3.1
Copper 3.0 4.7
Cyanide (total) 1.2 1.9
Cyanide (free) 1.0 1.6
Lead 0.3E 0.9
Mercury 0.03 0.05
Nickel 3.51 5.5
Silver 0.43 0.7
Zinc 0.7 1.1
Total Toxic Organics
(TTO) excluding PCB's
k Pesticides 0.58 0.9
PCB's and Pesticides 0.02 0.03
2. The discharge must at all times be in conformace with California Radiation
Control Regulations (California Administrative Code, Title 17) as presently
in effect or as hereafter amended.
3. The permit limitations as set forth in paragraph I above shall become
effective on the effective date of this Permit. The Discharger may be
permitted to discharge flows in excess of 0.137 MGD (130 gpm) only upon
approval of SAWPA and subsequent amendment to this Permit.
4. The treatment plant Is designed to treat up to 130 gpm (187,000 gpd) of
contaminated groundwater from the Stringfellow site. All groundwater to
be discharged to the SARI system must receive treatment. Only
groundwater from the Stringfellow site can be processed in the treatment
plant that is to be discharged to the SARI system.
5. Each final effluent storage tank or each tank truck leaving the site shall be
individually sampled in accordance with a program approved by SAWPA
before discharged to the SARI system. Blending of discharge tanks or
other sources to meet the discharge limits will not be allowed. No treated
waters shall be discharged to the SARI system that fails to meet
constituent limitations of this permit.
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS:
A written 30-day operating report covering the period of each calendar month
► shall be provided to SAWPA by discharger within 15 days of the end of this
reporting period. All sampling results shall be reported in terms of
concentration, daily mass emission rate in pounds per day, 30-day monthly
average concentration and 30-day monthly average mass emission rate in pounds
per day. The report shall also describe the status of all unit processes on line
and standby mechanical equipment, inventory of consumable process chemicals
and materials, operational problems, and maintenance performed during the
_ reporting period. Revised 12/19/85
Acknowledged �f
12/01/85 -3-
Attachment B-1
August 10, 1985
. Revised September 27, 1985
Revised December 19, 1985
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
STRINGFELLOW TREATED GROUNDWATER SYSTEM
MONITORING, REPORTING AND ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES
Section 1;' Introduction
In accordance with the decision of the Joint Boards on November 14, 1984 to
concur with SAWPA's issuance of an operating permit to the California Department
of Health Services*, provided certain conditions are met, these Monitoring,
Reporting and Enforcement Procedures are to be used as partial satisfaction
of these conditions.
Section 2, General Process Description
1. The treatment plant is designed to treat up to 130 gpm (187,000 gpd) of
contaminated groundwater from the Stringfellow site. All groundwater
accepted by CSOOC for disposal must receive treatment. Only groundwater
from the Stringfellow site can be processed in the treatment plant.
California law, a resolution of the SAWPA-Board of Directors, and the terms
of the operating and discharge permit under which the treatment plant will
- be operating, specifically preclude the use of the treatment plant for any
other waste stream.
2. The treatment train includes equalization tanks, lime addition, clarifica-
tion, sand filtration, activated carbon adsorption, and holding tanks.
As part of routine daily inspections, CSDOC Industrial Waste Division
inspection staff will be required to conduct a brief walkthrough of the
treatment plant to verify nominal operation of pH controllers, clarifiers,
filters, carbon contactors, and all final effluent read-out and recording
devices. Therefore, working knowledge of the processes and .of nominal
operating parameter ranges must be familiar to all Inspectors. CSDOC
Industrial Waste Division inspection staff will read and understand "Santa
Ana Watershed Project Authority, Operation and Maintenance Manual for
Interim Treatment Facilities, Stringfellow Hazardous Waste Site" . Training
of Industrial Waste Division staff to be provided by the Permittee.
3. All treated aroundwater will be tested and approved prior to hauling and
disposal at either the Chino or Arlington approved disposal stations.
* At their regular meeting of October 16, 1985, the Boards subsequently
authorized the reassignment of the permit to the United States Environmental
Protection Agency.
Attachment B-2 '
Section 3, Permit Limitations
n
1. Discharge in excess of the following limits is prohibited: �✓
Maximum Mass Maximum Concentration
Constituent Limits lbs/day Limits, ma/l
Arsenic 3.1 2.0
Cadmium 0.1 0.064
Chromium (total) 3.1 2.0
Copper 4.7 3.0
Cyanide (total) 1.9 1:2
Cyanide (free) 1.6 1.0
Lead 0.9 0.58
Mercury 0.05 0.03
Nickel 5.5 3.51
Silver 0.7 0.43
Zinc 1.1 0.7
Total Toxic Organics (TTO)
excluding PCBs & pesticides 0.9 0.58
PCBs and Pesticides 0.03 0.02
2. The discharge must at all times be in conformance with California Radiation
Control Regulations (California Administrative Code, Title 17) as presently
in effect or as hereafter amended.
3. The treated discharge water shall be placed and held in storaae tanks prior`
to discharging into the SAWPA/CSDOC sewerage facilities. No water shall be�w
discharged to said facilities that fails to meet all constituent limitations
of the permit.
4. Additional requirements, terms and conditions are contained in the permit
issued by SAWPA appearing in Section 6 of these procedures.
5. These limitations will be revised if environmental studies, EPA Regulations,
CSOOC standards or other factors indicate that stricter limitations are
appropriate.
Section 4,. Samolinc, Monitoring and Rebdrtina Requirements
.. Each final effluent storage tank or each tank truck leaving the site snail
De individually sampled by the Permittee or SAWPA. Analyses shall be
performed and conformance with all applicable standards shall be confirmed
prior to the acceptance of the treated groundwater by SAWPA at either the
Chino or Arlington approved disposal station. The suite of analyses
per ormed shall be in accordance with the requirements of SAWPA and CSOOC.
la.r/
Attachment B-3
2. The final effluent from the treatment plant shall be Sampled using a 24-hour
composite sampler by either the Permittee or SAWPA. The analytical .results
shall be reported daily and used in conjunction with the flow meter readings
to determine the final effluent discharge in terms of concentration and mass
../ emission.
3. Methods of sampling and analyses shall be in accordance with the most recent
edition of °Envirommental Protection Agency Regulations on Test Procedures
for the Analysis of Pollutants° by EPA (40 CFR 136) and shall be performed
by a laboratory approvedby SAWPA. Duplicate samples shall be retained for
a forty-five day period by the Permittee or its agent.
4. In the event that any results indicate that the final discharge will not
meet the discharge standards, the Permittee shall notify SAWPA and
immediately cease discharge. SAWPA will notify CSDOC of the results and the
subsequent actions by the Permittee and SAWPA. In no case shall the
Permittee recommence discharge until the Permittee is provided written
authorization by SAWPA and CSDOC.
S. The results of all analyses of final effluent conducted by CSDOC, SAWPA, the
Permittee or other parties shall be reported to SAWPA for forwarding to
CSDOC. A log shall be maintained and posted at all times by CSDOC in the
Industrial Waste Office for ready reference by CSDOC staff.
6. A written monthly operating report covering the period from the first aay of
the month to the last day of the month shall be provided to SAWPA by the
Permittee. It shall be forwarded to CSDOC by� SAWPA within 15 days of the
end of each reporting period. All sampling results shall be reported in
terms of concentration, daily mass emission rate in pounds per day, 30-day .
.,� monthly .average concentration and 30-day monthly average mass emission rate
in pounds per day. The report shall also describe the status of all unit
processes on line and standby mechanical equipment, inventory of consumable
process chemicals and materials, operational problems,, and maintenance
performed during the reporting period.
Section 5. Insoection Semolina and Enforcement Procedures b CSDOC Industrial
Waste ivision nsoection Sta f.
1. Inspection and sampling at the Stringfellow site shall be conducted daily.
Time of arrival shall be varied so that treatment plant operating staff
cannot anticipate the time of arrival . All inspections shall include a tour
through the treatment plant to conduct a visual check that all processes are
operating in a nominal manner as prescribed by the 0 & M manual or by posted
operational directives from the registered professional engineer supervising
the operation of the treatment plant. On-line pH and other meters that
indicate and record process parameters will he noted for conformance with
target operating parameters established by the registered professional
engineer.
Attachment B-4 ,
2. Daily grab or composite samples shall be taken by CSDOC in conformance with
CSDOC sampling and chain of custody procedures outlined in the current ^
edition of the °Industrial Waste Division Policies and Procedures". Samples/
will be analyzed at the CSDOC Laboratory or at a laboratory approved by
CSDOC. Sample splits shall always be" offered to the Permittee. -
3. SAWPA has the authority to imnedi.ately terminate the acceptance of
wastewater upon notification that the effluent does not meet the required
limitations. This termination can be effected without prior, notice and
hearing. If-.the results of a field inspection or sampling results provide
sufficient information to the CSDOC Industrial Waste Inspector to conclude
that .effluent limit violations are actual or imninent, then the inspector
shall verbally and through a written speed memo immediately notify SAWPA.
SAWPA will then suspend or revoke the permit or prohibit the discharge to
the Chino or Arlington disposal stations. Immediately after the notification
of SAWPA has been completed, the inspector shall.-notify the CSDOC Chief of
the Industrial Waste Division. A written report of the incident shall be
completed within 24 hours and provided to the CSDOC General Manager or his
designee, and copies of the report shall tre mailed to SAWPA. In no case
shall acceptance of discharge recomnenca until the Permittee is provided
written authorization by SAWPA and CSDOC.
4. The Permittee has agreed to adhere to the CSDOC Ordinance Establishing
Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities and all other SAWPA and
CSDOC ordinances, resolutions and regulations for the use and availability
of the SAWPA/CSDOC collection, treatment and disposal systems, including
enforcement provisions for any violation of said ordinances; resolutions any
regulations or the-provisions of the permit. In addition, SAWPA has reservl,i
the right to suspend or revoke this permit for any violations or non-
compliance with ordinances, resolutions, or regulations governing the
SAWPA/CSDOC facilities and operations or the provisions of this permit.
Therefore, the inspector must carefully evaluate all field observations and
sampling resu]ts that come to his/her attention. The CSDOC Joint Boards of
Directors will expect strict conformance win the conditions of the permit
and will expect CSDOC staff to immediately notify SAWPA so that swift action
can take place.
S. Periodic inspections and sampling at the approved disposal stations and
SAWPA's county-line metering station shall be conducted to verify the
adequacy of the monitoring and control measures of the Permittee, SAWPA and
CSDOC.
6. All activities pursuant to these activities shall be logged daily by the
CSDOC inspector in accordance with standard practice, and the carbon copies
submitted weekly to the CSDOC file. A Complete monthly report of the
inspection and sampling activities, including sampling results, shall be
-provided to SAWPA and to the CSDOC Board Secretary for submittal to the
Joint Boards.
Section 6, Stringfellow Permit
nconorated herein by reference.
AGREEMENT TO ASSIGN WASTE rERMIT
FOR STRINGFELLOW HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE
This AGREEMENT is made this 12th day of December 1985, by and between the STATE
OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES ("DEPARTMENT') and the UNITED STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( "EPA").
RECITALS:
A. Effective January 1, 1985, the SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY
( "SWAPA") issued a Waste Permit to the DEPARTMENT permitting the discharge of
pretreated wastewater from the Stringfellow Hazardous Waste Site into the Santa
Ana Regional Interceptor System ("SARI Systemu) . A true and correct copy of the
said Waste Permit is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by
this reference (hereafter "Waste Permit') .
B. Since the time of the issuance of the Waste. Permit, the DEPARTMENT and
� EPA have agreed that EPA would assume the responsibility of operating and'
maintaining certain pretreatment facilities located at the Stringfellow
Hazardous Waste Site, which pretreatment facilities are the subject of the Waste
Permit.
C. Pursuant to Paragraph 2(L) of the Waste Permit, the DEPARTMENT desires
to assign to EPA the right to discharge pretreated wastewater into the SARI
System, and EPA desires to accept that assionment, in accordance with the
following terms and conditions:
-1-
COVENANTS:
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL COVENANTS OF THE PARTIES, THE
PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: ^
1. The DEPARTMENT hereby assigns to EPA its right to discharge pretreated
wastewater into the SARI System in accordance with all of the terms and
conditions of the Waste Permit, which Waste Permit is attached hereto as Exhibit
"A" and incorporated herein by this reference. The DEPARTMENT hereby expressly
agrees that it shall assure compliance with EPA with all of the terms and
conditions of the Waste Permit, with the exception of indemnification
requirement, and that it shall remain liable to indemmify and hold SAWPA and the
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY (°CSDOC") harmless as provided for
in the indemnification provision of the Waste Permit, to the extent permitted by
California law and to the extent State funds are appropriated and available for
that purpose.
2. EPA hereby accepts the said assignment, subject to all of the terms an&.
conditions of this Assignment Agreement and the Waste Permit, with the exception
of the indemnification requirement: EPA cannot provide an explicit
indemnification to SAWPA and/or CSDOC in connection with the discharge of the
Stringfellow pretreatment plant effluent to the CSOOC/SAWPA system. EPA agrees
that EPA or its agents will make all payments of fees and charges levied
pursuant to the Permit directly to SAWPA. In the event that EEPA' s agents fail
to tender payment to SAWPA in a timely fashion, EPA will take action to assure
prompt payment to SAWPA. In the event that the DEPARTMENT hereafter assumes
responsibility from EPA for the operation of the pretreatment facility and/or
-2-
the discharge of wa n rrom the Stringfellow Hazar is waste Site, EPA shall no
longer be liable to SAWPA for any fees or charges arising under the Waste Permit
and incurred after the effective date of such assumption by the DEPARTMENT, or
for assuring the Discharger's compliance with the terms and conditions of the
Waste Permit. EPA agrees that EPA will remain liable for all payments of fees
and charges incurred by EPA prior to such reassignment to the DEPARTMENT.
In WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day and
year first written above.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES
By
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY
By
-3-
Attachment C-6 '
CONSENT TO ASSIGNMENT
The SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY, By and through its Manager
J. Andrew Schlange, hereby consents to the foregoing Assignment.
SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY
By
ndrew ch ange, enera Manager
Attachment D-1
A=OR22ATZON FOR ACCSS
This Authorization for Access is granted by the
Califer::ia State Department of Health Services on behalf of the
State of California (hereinafter referred to as GRANTOR) , to the
Santa Ana watershed Project Authority (hereinafter referred to as
SAWPA) .
WHEREAS, SAWPA seeps access to GRANTOR'S Property
in order to install, maintain and operate a mini-'lab for
monitoring for Compliance by the Stringfellow groundwater
treatment facility with the ta-rms of the permit to dis-=ba_�e t..
SAWPA-S Santa Ana Regional 2nterCemtor line:
A) GRANTOR'S grant unto SAWPA, its successors, assigns
and transferees, pe_=mission to conduct the !ollowinq activities
`./
upon GRANTCR-S property (hereinafter referred to as PROPMT?)
within Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 6 West, San. Be_—ma_t``re
Meridian in the County of Riverside, State of Ca'_iforaia as
outlined in green an the at`-ached map designated as r_shibit "A":
1) Establish a mini-lab at the location shown in red in
'xi.b "A". The lab is to be equipped with:
-10' X 32' t^ailar with six condi-ion_tg
^refriga-ration for sample storage
-telephone communication
-analytical equipment to analyzer indicaar C==ai-.mans
^laboratory glassware and reagamms as rscr_Qd
.work bench, tables and chairs -
-PC=-able to—at facil pies
2) UndaY-aka t_Icse act_v_t_es aecessa-: pc =a_-ta_.- a-❑
Attachment D-2
operate the mini-lab referenced in sub-pa_—agraph (A) (1) above.
H) Persons entitled to access to the PROPERTY by this
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, their
authorization include SAAPA, /L= officers, agents, employees ,
contractors and subcontractors.
-
C) Persons entering the PROPERTY to perform any of the
tasks set forth in this authorization may be asked by GR:' __OR,
, ts officers, agents, employees, contractors or subcontractors
to produce appropriate identification. Anyone without such
identification may be excluded from the PROPERTY.
D) SAAPA and its officers, agents , employees ,
cant-acters and subcom= ctars shall not use the PROPERTY in any
manner that would interfere with or cause harm to the water
treatment facility or its operation or to any other activity
be'_ng under-taken by any other person on the PROPERTY.
E) GRANTOR'S authorization of SAWPA'S access to the
PROPERTY shall not be construed as a release of any claims,
causes of action, or demands in law or equity the Department may
have against SAAPA, its employees, office-s, agents, ccn^=actcrs,
subcont_-actors, representatives, heirs, assignees or transferees
-r any liabil.y they may have arising out of cr relating to toe
_:stal_aticn, maintenance or operation of the m'ti-'tab reference=
_n ?aragraph (A) .
F) By accenting this Authorization far Access, SAAPA
ag_ees to indemnify the GRANTOR from liahi y for env -.;•--y t_
persons ar property proximately caused. by the acts of SAWFA cr
a } c___car, agent, employee, eantractar or stb co tra ct ar a.
Snw?> arising out of or relating to the installatiaa, aaintanance �J
cr cperat_on of the m'ni-lab referenced -. ?aracaph (A) .
2
Attachment D-3 -
G) By accepting this Authorization for Access , SAWPA
agrees that it and all of its officers, agents, employees .
contractors and subcort= cars will comply with all terms of the
^Interim Health amd Safety for Pretreatment Plant Operation a=.d
Maintenance at Stringfellow Site, Riverside, Cali=ornia" dated .
September 6, 1SSS. -
H) SAWPA agrees that they are solely responsible for
taking those actions necessary to install, maintain azd ope_-ate
the miti-lab referenced in paragraph (A) .
I) This Airthorizaticn for Access may be revoked by the
GRANTOR at any time alter bavimq provided SAWPA with t!! -y (30)
days notice. If the GRANTOR revokes SAW?A's Authorization f..r
Access, SAWPA reserves the right to terminate GRANTOR' s waste
diseha-�-ge permit.
Santa Ana Watershed Califormia State
?rojeet Authority Depa-went of 3ea1-=, Services
3y: By:
3
Attachment E-1
AGREEMENT RE THIRD PARTY CLAIMS
The Environmental Protection Agency (°EPA°), the Santa Ana Watershed
Project Authority (°SAWPA•), and the County Sanitation Districts of Drange
County, California ("CSDOC°), hereby agree as follows:
1. SAWPA and/or CSDOC may be subject to third party claims and litigation
arising out of their acceptance of effluent into the Santa Ana Regional
Interceptor/Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer .system, hereinafter °SARI System",
discharged from the Stringfellow pretreatment facility while it is operated by
EPA under a Waste Permit issued by SAWPA. The costs incurred by SAWPA and/or
CSDOC to defend against such claims and litigation are an operating cost of the
wastewater treatment system for the Stringfellow facility.
2. SAWPA may include in the monthly user charge to EPA, an amount to
offset anticipated defense costs for SAWPA and/or CSDOC.' The total amount to be
collected and kept, on deposit for this purpose shall not exceed Two Hundred
Thousand (S200,000.00) Dollars, and shall be collected as follows: One Hundred
Thousand (S100,000.00) Dollars in the first month of the operation, and Ten
Thousand ($10,000.00) Dollars each month for each of the following ten (10)
months, provided, however, that in the event of such claim and the reimbursement
payment of said costs to SAWPA and/or CSDOC, SAWPA may include in its succeeding
monthly user charoes to -EPA, a sum equal to that necessary to return the oalance
on aeposit to the same amount as prior to making payments or to the sum of Two
Hundred Thousand ($200,000.00) Dollars, whichever is greater.
3. SAWPA shall deposit the sums collected and administered (pursuant to
?araaraph 2 in an account identified as a "defense account"), separate from its
-1-
u wwwcu� .-s
other operating fur. Said account shall be an i zrest-bearing account and
shall be dedicated to and available only .for defense costs as set forth below.
4. SAWPA shall maintain the defense account funds on deposit for a period
of one (1) year after the expiration of. this Agreement. Said funds may be used
during said period for any claim or complaint filed against SAWPA and/or CSDOC
during the one (1) year period following expiration. In the event of such claim
or complaint being filed and still being actively pursued after the expiration
period, the entire sum of funds on deposit can be utilized by SAWPA and/or CSDOC
as required and in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.
One (1) year after the expiration of this Agreement, SAWPA shall return to
EPA or its designee, any funds, including interest earned, that remain in the
defense account, except as provided.above for the payment of continued defense
costs relating to existing claims or complaints.
5. SAWPA and/or CSDOC shall notify each other and EPA within five (5) day,
of the receipt of a third party claim and complaint seeking damages or other
remedies as a result of the discharge into the SARI System from the Stringfellow
pretreatment facility while such facility is being operated by EPA, its
contractors or assignees.
Within ten (10) days of receipt of such notice, the recipient shall inform
the notifying party of its interest, if any, in ,coining the suit as a defendant
or in participating in the defense of the suit.
Use of funds from the defense account is contingent on timely notice to the
other parties to this Agreement.
-2
6. SAWPA and/..,- CSDOC may use funds from the Defense account for
attorney's .fees; direct costs incurred by SAWPA and/or CSDOC personnel in
preparing for or participating in the suit, including but not limited to
responding to discovery, particpating in depositions or testifying at trials,
expert witness fees, transcript costs and other administrative costs directly
associated with the claim or litigation.
SAWPA and/or CSDOC shall incur costs and make payments to be reimbursed
From the defense account in accordance with applicable state and local laws,
ordinances and regulations.
7. SAWPA and/or CSDOC shall not use funds from the defense account to pay
any judgments awarded against them or any settlements of third party claims.
8. SAWPA and/or CSDOC shall maintain records on the use of funds from the
defense account in accordance with standard accounting practices. Such records
shall be retained for three (3) years after the expiration of this Agreement.
At -CPA's request, SAWPA and/or CSDOC shall provide such records to the EPA or
its designee--or audit.
9. This Agreement shall remain in affect for the period in which EPA, its
contractors or assignees, operates the pretreatment facility at Strinafellow
under a Waste Permit issued by SAWPA, and the statutory period for which claims
may be filed.
-3-
December 4 , 1985
Wayne Sylvester
County Sanitation Districts of- Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Andrew Schlange
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority
3600 Tyler Street, Suite 207
Riverside, California 92503
Dear Messieurs Sylvester and Schlange: .
I am writing in order to address your concerns about the
potential legal and financial risks which I understand you
feel the county Sanitation Districts of Orange County ( CSDOC)
and the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority ( SAWPA) may be
exposed to by accepting treated. water effluent from the
. Stringfellow pre-treatment plant.
EPA recognizes that CSDOC and SAWPA have voluntarily come
forward to assist EPA and DOHS in cleaning up the Stringfellow
site. EPA further recognizes that CSDOC and SAWPA assert that .
they have no present legal obligation to accept treated water
effluent from the Stringfellow pre-treatment plant even though
it will meet or be under the effluent contaminant levels esta-
blished or adopted by your agencies.
As we have discussed , EPA cannot -provide you with an ex-
plicit indemnification against claims by third parties in con-
nection with the discharge of the Stringfellow ore-treatment
plant effluent to the CSDOC/SAWPA system. However , should
CSDOC or SAWPA be subject to such claims or judgments , DOES
nas agreed to provide you with limited indemnification, as
see forth in the Waste Permit. In addition, you are free
to pursue your remedy at law with EPA for such claims under
the Federal Tort Claims Act. I£ and when EPA is authorized
by future legislative or administrative action to provide a
ssatement of indemnity to CSDOC and SAWPA, we would be
. willing to do so.
In addition, EPA agrees to establish a mechanism for
attorproviding funds to CSDOC and/or SAWPA for reasonable
-neys fees and litigation-related expenses , up to an amount
to be agreed upon, which you may incur in defending against -
r third party claims resulting from EPA' s discharge of effluent
from the Stringfellow pre-treatment facility into the CSDOC/
SAWPA system.
As my staff has indicated to you, several existing factors
make it unlikely that EPA would have cause to bring administra-
tive or judicial enforcement actions against CSDOC or SAWPA in
connection with your acceptance of effluent from the String-
fellow pre-treatment plant. First, numerous safeguards have
been enacted in the sampling and monitoring process to prevent
the discharge of effluent that does not meet the prescribed
standards to the CSDOC/SAWPA system. Second, the quantity
. of both effluent and contaminants in the discharge from the
Stringfellow plant will be very small compared to the present
flow and contaminant levels in the CSDOC/SAWPA system from
other sources. Finally, when treated to the established dis-
charge standards and discharged to a POTW, the water effluent
from the Stringfellow pre-treatment plant will not pose a
threat to public health and the environment. The discharge
of this effluent is consistent with other environmental
statutes.
In view of the above facts, we believe that it is un-
likely that pre-treatment of the Stringfellow waste in accord-
ance with the appropriate discharge standards would subject
CSDOC and SAWPA to possible enforcement action by EPA.
I hope that this letter satisfies your concerns re-
garding these issues. I appreciate your continued coopera-
tion in regard to our efforts, to obtain a discharge permit
for the Stringfellow pre-treatment facility.
�.s
Sincerely,
John Wise
Deputy Regional Administrator
- 2 -
A a
Aj�i
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION 1%
215 Fmmont Street
San Francisco. Ca. 94105
December 16 , 1985
Andrew Schlange
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority
3600 Tyler Street, Suite 207
Riverside, California 92503
Dear Mr. Schlange:
As you know, treated effluent from the Stringfellow
pretreatment plant in compliance with the permit limitations
will be transported to the Santa Ana Regional Interceptor
for disposal via truck. Effluent from the pretreatment plant
which meets the permit limitations is not a hazardous waste as
da£ined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) ;
therefore , it will not be necessary to prepare hazardous waste
manifests for the treated effluent.
Your agency , as well as _members of the public, have
expressed the desire to have a mechanism which would ensure
that trucks leaving the Stringfellow site could not pick up
waste water. from other sources -prior to disposal at the drop
point. - In order to address this concern, as well as to provida
a means of tracking the effluent for cost and reporting purposes ,
EPA' s contractor, Camo, Dresser s McKee, has developed the
attached "Treated Effluent Hauling Record" . Please note that
this form provides a place for SAWPA to approve of the effluent
for disposal. Thus, this form will also serve as a record of.
SAWPA' s approval of the effluent to be discharged.
If you have any questions regarding this matter , please
contact Keith Takata at (415 ) 974-8910 .
Sincerely,
. l Ha4':'y Se raydarian
� , , Director
TOxics & Waste Management Divis.on
Attachment
cc: Wayne Sylvester, CSDOC
A 3 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
: f
4 REGION I% ,
215 Fremont Street
San Francisco. Ca. 94106
VIA EXPEDITED ELECTRONIC MAIL
.. December 19, 1985 -
Andrew Schlange
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority
3600 Tyler Street, Suite 207
Riverside, California 92503
Dear Mr. Schlange:
In compliance with General Condition no. 3 of the String-
fellow Hazardous Waste Site Discharge Permit , we are requesting
your approval of the following program:
- sampling will be conducted daily
- each effluent tank will be sampled
- each sample will receive full priority pollutant analysis
- analytical results will be submitted to SAWPA for approval
- discharge will commence upon receipt of SAWPA ' s approval
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
call me at ( 415 ) 974-7460 .
Sincerely,
411/
` f
Harry Seraydarian
Director
Toxi Cs 6 Waste Management Division
cc: Wayne Sylvester, CSDOC
`r/
SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY
`./ AMENDMENT NO. I TO
WASTE PERMIT
STRINGFELLOW HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE
Paragraph (M) of the waste permit is hereby amended to read as follows:
"2 (M) This permit shall expire on December 31, 1990."
SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT
AUTHORITY:
1� Date
D SCHHAARRGGER:
By<GL ate /7 19 — if
California State Dept f
Health Services
By �L/`GrK� Date
Waehvironmental
ection Agency
\/
SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
AUTHORIZATION FOR ACCESS
STRINGFELLOW HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE
Paragraph "G" of the Authorization for Access granted by the California State
Department of Health. Services on behalf of the State of California, to the Santa
Ana Watershed Project Authority, dated February 13, 1987, is hereby amended to
read as follows:
" Gj By accepting this Authorization of Access SAWPA agrees that it and
all of its officers, agents, employees, contractors and subcontractors will
comply with all terms of the following reports:
1. "Site Access and Security Plan for the Operation and Maintenance of
Stringfellow Groundwater Pretreatment Plant", dated February 13, 1987.
2. "Safety, Health and Emergency Response Plan for the Operation and
Maintenance of Stringfellow Groundwater Pretreatment Plant", Volumes 1 and
2, dated February 13, 1987."
Santa Ana Watershed California State
Project Authority Department of Health Services
B ! L By:
e12 c� Date: / 7 12g,_ 1:2
1i1 f
_ ear 'sxaP_-n2s Boa
*acres 'zaxuags.Aeg •a
oocso 't-a5:-£T aoA _wet,-o;; .00
oaro=g roTTsa5ss, S
---�;aSecEYi 'RnE � pa
/JJ
•066Z-FZc (976) we SSu,r q.aE :D2¢ueo E52a Td 'suocsenn
rus aneq no4 a_ q uD= :�Xau no3 q_,n 5t,2aac CZ P=£M30g %DDT =
•arts aq� u-ES2z TT-x e_-
e- 1US=BT5%V -.T=vP a5z2gD5Tp curl :%Vs bu:tsn:a
cz uO,Sta_:e zzar C." 2 e%TT PTnoM C-jQ 'S L'rE15
=not, >o S=aq=az n,r: 5=,asas LE61 'ZZ star at,t 3E pessaDET? sr
'FT:ZIICJ aStE=Q =0 STO: STQ 'L'CT1£:�,L'E$ FaaC'
SD s=a_s7 paTog aq^t D-4 ssar.,b aq T-,pi StTgaTzc a 'to,q,ppe
atTp 5u-,,,csc D,T„nd a:ET=3ozddz
tz gS,TC:£Csa •r:z2 572TOTrvo % =D, a5me=0 C: pas=5z toatnE
•aP,s=an,g L. 4E67 'TZ ATnr =c> bt,q.aaa D,TCcLi ==odag
:pyE _C> CST2 527 �IIa^=2 a',] 'v�y •uasogo a=a Suo-m e
T£,parez .2_,p a._ 8=-— q buT-168= D.Tgnd 2 Pt2 Po,=e? =ss0 DD
oTT^�d az.isuensa t2 aq TT WA a=zJa •'3od6g Sl a%7', 70 B52aTaz
=E3I sT �D pua - nq zzodag (53) �Pn+S i.t,Trq,sae:
et*e:DO C7 MDeJ:a PUM =Dd9E tD.=ES,tSHAVI TE,pacat
.. --zr5_:=_g a - DanasdcCD i.Tgtaoa= 5Eq i.q::eSF toTlOeq.=c T2ata'a
�eqo. p=v (S3Q) sso,z.¢a>^ �4Tr ,-o e41
:u0s=apue P_e aStzTgDS •S=SSSv area
LZTE-EZ!Z6 iJ 'Aa772A L',£gincg
anuez•B 577TZ "EOT
LZ-E x02 c
i:n_ncD 65r=p gD
I'DT_
uzs'apLy el;-eT- ar
tosz6
L02r -'sezas =e:l , 009t
Zny =oa'c=g pagS=a_ey euy- _tes
a5-2TgDS ra=puB 'r *--K
rT6z-czc
c_:)IAFBS N1TY?H d0 lNgWloyc3O
.v.w"� 'wr:TNrec MY'd� t�w]Cr iur.•an, owr w�ra�-riwua�•ir. t� c:rai -
STAN OF CAUFMNIAIEµM AND WEUARE AGENCf GEDRGE DEURMUTAN, Ge.�ws
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES
714/7. P STREET
T@AMENTG. G gW14 `A:Y
(916) 323-2913
October 21, 1987
.� Mr. J. Andrew Schlange
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority
3600 Tyler Street, Suite 207
Riverside, CA 92503
Mr. Blake Anderson
county sanitation Districts of Orange County
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 -
Gentleman:
During our August 18, 1987 meeting, a great deal of discussion
revolved around the schedule for completion of the Stringfellow
Hazardous Waste Site Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study
(RI/FS) and the commitment of the 'State to complete these
studies. The purpose of this letter is to reiterate the State's
commitment to the development of a cleanup solution for the
Stringfellow Site and to provide the projected schedule for a
decision on the cleanup solution.
The State of California, Department of Health Services (DHS) has
lead responsibility for the completion of the Stringfellow RI/Ps.
DEB works in close conjunction with the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) in all aspects of the RI/FS. DEB and EPA released
the draft Stringfellow Remedial Investigation (RI) Report on June
1, 1987 and conducted public meetings to discuss the report in
Glen Avon and Fountain Valley.
The Feasibility Study (FS) has been ongoing during the
development of the RI. - A draft FS is scheduled to be released
for public review in mid 1988. The construction of the
Stringfellow extraction system network and pretreatment plant are
interim actions which were initiated before completion of the FS
because of their necessity. Cleanup of the Stringfellow Site
will involve a combination of a number of components which will
address the contaminated soil found in the on-site area,
contaminated bedrock below the site, contaminated groundwater
below the on-site area, contaminated groundwater in the canyon
area and the less contaminated groundwater in the community of
Glen Avon.
Mr. J. Andrew Schlange
Mr. Blake Anderson
October 21, 1987
Page two
As you requested, I have included a schedule for completion of
the Feasibility Study and estimates for completion of activities
prior to the implementation of the final remedial actions. As
you know, it is our understanding that neither this letter, nor
the attached schedule, will become a term or condition of, or be
attached to, the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA)
permit for the Stringfellowpretreatment plant effluent disposal.
This information is being provided in the interests of
coordination and cooperation between our two agencies, not for
the purposes of regulation or permitting by SAWPA or the County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) . If this is
contrary to your intentions, please notify us immediately in
writing.
Feasibility Study The purpose of the Feasibility Study is to identify and
assess remedial alternatives appropriate to the Stringfellow
Site. The FS process involves three phases. These phases
are: Phase one, the development of alternatives; Phase Two,
the initial screening of alternatives based on -health and
environmental protection, institutional requirements,
technical feasibility, and cost effectiveness; and Phase
Three, the detailed evaluation of alternatives, followed by
a recommendation of a final site closure alternative and
development of a preliminary conceptual design. Phases one
and two of the Stringfellow FS were completed concurrently
with the RI. Phase 3, detailed analysis, is underway and is
scheduled for completion in June, 1988. Treatability
studies to determine the specific effectiveness of treatment
technologies for the Stringfellow Site are being conducted.
Results of these studies will be incorporated into the FS.
Alternate Water
The Alternate Water Program is funded by the Department of
Health Services and will provide approximately 500 Glen Avon
residences previously relying on domestic wells, with a
hookup to the Jurupa Community Services District. The
hookups are 88% complete and will be finished by May, 1988.
ter.
Mr. J. Andrew Schlange
Mr. Blake Anderson
October 21, 1987
Page Three
Site Drainage Channels
The site drainage channels are early implementation items,
designed to carry clean surface water around the Site, in
order to prevent infiltration into the Site .and eventual
contamination of this clean water. The channels are
currently in design, which is scheduled to be completed by
12-1-87. Following the design, DHS will competitively
procure a construction contractor for construction of the
channels. This procurement must comply with the
requirements of the State Administrative Manual, Section
1200 et seq. , as well as federal procurement regulations
stated in 40 CFR. State . and federal procurement
requirements are extensive and are designed to conserve the
financial interests of the State and federal fund sources
and to prevent improvident acts and expenditures. The
procurement process involves detailed descriptions, of the
work, extensive Agency reviews of procurement packages,
advertisement of procurements, review of bids received and
the eventual award of contracts. The average DHS
procurement, with EPA review, takes between four months and
two years, depending upon the complexity of the proposed
r./ project and number of contractors to be procured. This site
drainage project represents a significant capital investment
and because of the nature of the work will require a seven
month procurement timeframe. Construction of the channels
will take approximately nine months.
Freeway Extraction wells
The freeway extraction wells are an early implementation
item and will be designed to provide complete capture of the
contaminant plume. Currently, contaminated groundwater is
extracted from the on-site area, below the barrier dam and
in the mid-canyon area, south of the pretreatment plant.
The design of this system will entail a pipeline to the
pretreatment plant, storage tanks, eductor well system,
extraction wells and monitoring wells and access roads. The
design, which was begun in August, 1987, is expected to take
seven months to complete because of the number of items to
be designed.
v.
� t
Mr. J. Andrew Schlange
Mr. Blake Anderson
October 21, 1987
Page Four
In addition, EPA and DHS have sent a notice letter regarding
construction of this system to the Responsible Parties, who
are participating in the design review process. This notice
letter is not expected to impact the overall project
schedule. The Community Technical Advisor, Environ, is
reviewing design documents at the 35% and 90% design
completion points and are providing comments for the
community as well.
Procurement is expected to take seven months and will be
carried out as described in the Site Drainage Channels.
The extraction system will take 12 months to construct and
startup. During construction, exact placement of each
monitoring well will be dependant upon the data obtained
during construction of the previous well. This well
placement process will involve EPA, DHS, responsible party
and community technical input.
FS Public Comment
Upon release of the Draft FS Report, a three month public
comment period will begin. The Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986 incorporates the
community relations process into the selection of remedies.
In recognition of this requirement, EPA and DHS plan to have
a three month public comment period in which the Governments
receive and consider the opinion and recommendations of the
public regarding the FS and the recommended remedial
alternative. Public meetings will be held in Riverside and
Orange Counties.
Record of Decision
The Record of Decision (ROD) is the formalization of the
remedy selection process. The ROD contains an accurate and
complete summary of the site, the threat it poses and the
selected remedy. In addition, the ROD describes the
justification of the final decision. The ROD is required by
the EPA National Contingency Plan and complies with the
State Remedial Action Plan requirement in Title 22, Chapter
6.8, Article 5, Section 25356.1 of the Health and Safety
Code. Because the ROD documents the final remedy selection
which will include public comment and input, the ROD cannot
be effectively started until the completion of the FS public
comment period. The ROD will take approximately eight
months to complete.
"f
s
Mr. J. Andrew Schlange
Mr. Blake Anderson
October 21, 1987
Page Five
Special Notice
The Special Notice is required by the comprehensive
Environmental Response Compensation Liability Act (CERCLA)
Section 122(e) , 42 U.S.C. Subsection 9622(e) . as amended by
the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986
- (SARA) , P.L. 99-499. The Notice encourages the Responsible
Parties to voluntarily perform or finance the response
activities described in the Record of Decision. The Special
Notice will be concurrent to the ROD, with an additional two
month period for negotiation of the Responsible Party's
participation after the documentation of the final cleanup
remedy is complete.
Design Contract Procurement , Engineering Design,
Construction Contract Procurement. Construction/Shakedown
After a final remedial alternative is selected and
documented in the ROD, the necessary plans and
specifications are outlined and a bid package is prepared
for each element of the remedial alternative. It is
anticipated that the remedial alternative designed to
_mitigate contamination in the community will be an
extraction system, which will take less time to design,
procure and construct than the more complicated remedial
alternatives for the canyon and on-site areas. Therefore,
the two schedule tracks, "Community" and "All other" are
shown.
All procurement must be in compliance with regulations set
forth in the State Administrative Manual, Section 1200 et
seq. , and federal procurement requirements.
The community engineering design will involve the design of
a well system for contaminated groundwater extraction, a
pipeline to a treatment or reinjection location, disposal of
the treated groundwater or brine and a plan for ten-year
restoration of the Glen Avon sub-basin. It is estimated to
take ten months to complete this design.
v✓
Mr. J. Andrew Schlange
Mr. Blake Anderson
October 21 , 1987
Page six
A design schedule for the remaining remedial alternatives is
difficult to estimate at this time, because the final remedy
is yet to be selected. Items still in consideration include
dewatering of the on-site area through extraction wells or
an adit system, excavation and treatment or isolation of the
contaminated soil below the barrier dam, isolation or
treatment of the on-site soils, flushing or de-watering of
the canyon areas. The design, procurement and construction
of these items will be more lengthy than the time estimated
for the community extraction system. Our best estimates at
this time are:
Design Contract Procurement 1 year
Engineering Design 1.5 years
Construction Contract Procurement 1 year
Construction/Shakedown 6 years
DHS has received funding for a majority of the FS from the EPA's
Superfund program. DHS has State funds allocated for the design
of the early implementation items. DHS has submitted a request
to EPA for funding sufficient to complete the FS, and fund the
construction of the freeway extraction system and site drainage
channels. EPA has awarded these funds to the State. In
addition, DRS has sufficient State funds to complete the
alternate water project and finance its share of ongoing project
expenses. A substantial additional amount of State funds has
been set aside to be used as the State's 10% share of the cost of
the final .remedy in the event the responsible parties do not come
forward to implement the site closure plan.
DHS is cognizant of, and sincerely appreciates the participation
of CSDOC and SAWPA in addressing the cleanup of one of the
Nation's best-known hazardous waste cleanup sites. Disposal of
the Stringfellow Pretreatment Plant effluent to the Santa Ana
Regional Interceptor sewer line is essential to the current
efforts to cleanup Stringfellow, and to mitigate further
contamination of the Glen Avon Sub-basin. I hope the information
provided herein sufficiently covers the major activities and the
Government's commitment to their implementation. If you have any
questions, please contact Beth Jines, of my staff, at (916) 323-
2990.
S inc el.yl;, /d
T Rauh, Manager
Stringfellow Project
cc: Keith Takata, EPA
SIEINFELM Ns2et00U8 Ie9tE 911E Q9FDUSE
1967 1906 1909 1990 1991 1992 1993 ,
9 12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 3. 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12
6-30-66
eealbllity Stud/ > •••«•••••••• e
5-1-66
ttermte Wter > •MM«M e
Opim 9recva Cmetruat
12-1-67 7.1-60 3-1.09
its Drmrope f1.16 > •« p «•«« • O. .««« p
Owl" • 9racws Cotetrtet/Sheteden
2+1•M 9.1-E0 9.1-09
-ee my Eetreetim Yells > .««. . «««« a .«nn«.«.«n e .
6.30-M 9-30-M
9WIIa Caeaeet o ••• o
9-30-Y 6-1-09
word of Declaim a•••••••••• e
11.1-69 6.1.09
valet Motive o ••••••••• e
nim Cmtrct 9roatremtt 6.1.09 3.1.90 '
Comtelty a«««....« p
ell Other 6.1-89 6.1-90
. . ««.««.... . .
glreerltq Dnim 3-1-90 1-1-91
C.itY
At Other - 6.1.90 12-1-91
eett.1 im Centro 9ractYemmt 1-1-91 10-1.91
Conasetity 0 n«nn..e. 0
At Other 12-1-91 12-1.92
.........n«... O .
atrmtlan/Shesedset 10-1-91 7.1-92
CaeoetltY
12.1.92 12.1-96
All Other e• ••«...«.««« >
STRINGFELLOW
UPDATE
PUBLISHED BY THE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SECTION
TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL PROGRAM, STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES
SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER1990
Community Well Testing Starts Soon
Well test project paves the way for ground water cleanup
The planned ground water cleanup which will, among other things,provide there by mid-October.They will drill one
is drawing closer as drilling rigs prepare the information necessary to appropri- extraction well and seven observation
to move Into the Glen Avon community. ately design the cleanup system. wells. The drilling project should last
Workcrews should begin drilling the test Short-Tenn Tests about one month, followed by a 3 1/2
wells by mid-October. These wells will The well testing project will begin week pump test (see figure 5). During
be placed in two locations. One will be with the installation of eight wells at the the pump test, workers will measure
nexttothe First Southem Baptist Church, northern well test area located on the both the pumping rate andthe volume of
which is located nearthe intersection of church property (see figure 1 for drill
Pyrite and Stonewood Streets.Theother sites). Contractors plan to begin drilling (Please see Community, page 2)
well location will be at Galena and Lone
Trail. H
Currently,there is a plume of ground
water contamination that extends ap- r
proximately two miles from the original
N.w6hort-term test drill-
ing to start near
First Southern Baptist
Church in October.
—
disposalareaattheStringfellowsite(see
figure 4) into the Glen Avon community. s�unr=wuau ; •�
Chloroform, TCE, nitrates and sulfates
are the principle Stringfellow related con- I
tarninants of ooncem inthe groundwater.
At present,this ground water is no(being
used as a source for drinking water. w
The California Department of Health un�er+n
Services (Department) and the Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency (EPA)
havedeveloped atwo-phased approach
to address the ground water contami- '
nationfromthe Stringfellow site.The first +saes.
phase involved the installation of wells ^ +
that intercept contaminated ground wa-
ter before it leaves the canyon. These
wells are all operating north of Highway up roe
60.The second phase of the projectwill o vmp•ae•cumrq w.0
,ail cleaning the contaminant plume • e•�•nrce wen
`death the Glen Avon community.The
well test program will set the stage for
that cleanup. The test project will con-
sist of short and long-term well tests Figure/.Reference wells w be monitored Curing rest program.
t
GommunHy(from page 1)
water being pumped. These data will scheduled to begin next summer.Work- connected to the Jurupa Community Ser-
h elp them decide whether the wells are ers will then begin to construct perm- vices District sewer line,where the water
suitable for the longer three month test. nent facilities at the well locations. Each will be discharged afterthe contaminants
Workers will then move to the will consist of a small underground vault have been removed.
southern site on Galena near Lone with a manhole to allow access to the Goals
Trail(see figure 3) and repast the pro- pump (see figure 2). In addition, the The goal ofthe ground watercleanup
cedure.Residents should notethatthis contractor will install a pipellne that will project in the community area is to
drilling site is located immediately ad- connect the two well saes with the stor- cleanup the site-related corltaminantsto
Jacent to the road, and will, at times, age tanks located at the lower canyon acceptable levels. The agencies esti-
probabfy block a portion of the south well site just north of Highway 60. The mate that the cleanup will take between
lane of traffic during the two month pipeline will convey thewaterto thetanks, 25 and 75 years to complete.The shorter
drilling and testing operation, thus replacing the tanker trucks used for estimate assumes that treated water in-
As the water is removed from the the short-term tests. jelled back into the fringe of the plume
wells,awlllbe pumped into storage tanks The agencies anticipate that the will aid the cleanup process.Reinjection
wells may begin pumping water for the is preferred by the agencies because it
AS .Rgasl. second stage of tests early in 1992. is expected to hasten the cleanup and
wr Onceagain,the twowell siteewill operate will keep the water in the ground water
in succession, with the northern she basin.Datafromthe shoe and long-term
pumping first. Each well pump will op- tests will help determine whether
erate for three months during this test, reinjection is feasible.
that will be temporarily located near bringingthe secondtest stage to an end Responsible Parties Conduct Tests
the wells. Tanker trucks will periodi- by Fall, 1992. Should the wells perform The community Parwell lest program
tally emptythe tanks and transport the efficiently,they may eventually be used p 9
waterto the treatment plant at the site. during the long-term cleanup project. will be performed by a number of the
This first stage of the well testing JCSD Sewers Take Treated Water companies found responsible for the
program is scheduled to end by Febru- contamination at the Stringfellow site,
ary, 1991. Following the tests, workers During the long-term test, the con- although all of thework will be supervised
will cap the wells and remove all of the tractor will treat the water at the lower by the Department and the EPA. The
equipment from the sites. canyon well site instead of transporting Responsible Parties JRPs) have con-
the water to the treatment plant at the ducted other Stringfellow related work--
Long-Term Tests site. This will take place at a temporary including the construction of the to
If the snort-term tests are success- treatment plant that will be assembled at canyon well complex and last summe?V
ful, the second stage of well tests is the lower canyon she. The plant will be geophysical survey in the community.
Figure 2.Propowd pump and cowol acc=vaue(typical). Figure 3.layout of South well for ren program.
2
1 Stringfellow Site Plan .�YY•Y ,� a e..ww
L�M\•MOWnnY� � w` \
• a�CG•N.P.aKVYw•T• \
onv��• •h�` � �rwaYNr efwf r .
♦ . .•..0 ♦wNNr sn
p os...e.•c..n. u �•b . \;
ar�u •bn +,' � ,f•• ,c�•riary i l°MEi
to %.t a, �nf. i•ra nnoe•ffa anovs°wNTfn fel1Ya11aY
M°MIYECiIOY WELL fYSIFY
y � My G • puNYl ��
M^xFx N4` - GLfxNwv t ° - �
-- • fffYfNT1.\T
CNN(
c
'< n ✓r
o-�
Figwei.The Lvgernpfhavatheplwwofcommnbuudgrowdw tAaoromUfrmrhe S&ineeL°w Site LY°GLmAw marit�gand®adimwe0.
andthe d1JJa,atgwgrapAlcraYrofthar .Almaho azAe armwhe AeLawca�yw Gro dWm Enr EJ Syttonhw been cm xaei.The
•Yrp sha.spanibk bcaflc•Y of®aciat w Urthatmay e°nrpirc the C&.%w,dy Groud Water Fxractlar Syo m myth ctHighwoy 6O u,GLa,Awn.
GLOSSARY ROD Signed
Ground water:The supply of water found beneath the Earth's surface.
Plume:A visible or measurable discharge of a contamiront from a given prim The U.S. Environmental Protection
of origin. Agency and the California Department
of Heath Services have signed a Record
Record of Decision: A decision document that explains the actions to be of Decision (ROD) which will move the
taken at a Superfund site. .-Stringfellow project into the next stage
of cleanup activities. In brief, the re-
SHORT-TERM TEST sponse actions In the ROD include the
Oct Nov Dec Jan following activities:
i • Cleanup of the site-related plume
Drill North Wells of contaminated ground water in
the community.
Pump North Wells
Dewatering of the site.
Drill south Wells
• On-cite soil vapor extraction tests,
Pump South Wells -- . A field ir"of reinjection in the
LONG-TERMTEST - _ "The agendas are preparing a fact
1 '1991 :-1ggp m It
which will describe the ROD in
- ' ore detail,and will be distributed in
Construct Permanent Faciites 'Me Coming weeks. In addition, the
JI --agencies plan to host a public meeting
Pump Second Stage Wets !n the future to discuss this milestone.
-71he meeting will be advertised by mail
fFq.J.Sched kgAcw fie - -.rdin local newspapers.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
.1 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
IOBm ELU6 AVENUE
_ PO 90.0127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92729.912➢
171419624411
October 18 , 1990
STAFF REPORT
Proposed Agreement with James M. Montgomery
Engineers to Perform Air Toxics Emissions
Inventory and Health Risk Assessment
Report to Comply with AS 2588
Background
The California Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Information and Assessment
Act of 1987 (AB 2588) mandates the development of a state-wide
emissions inventory of toxic air pollutants. The Districts - two
treatment plants are subject to the requirements of the Act and,
accordingly, must prepare inventory plans, conduct field testing,
calculate emissions estimates and conduct human health risk
assessments as previously reported to the Directors.
Tasks Completed to Date
The Boards have previously authorized work totaling $850, 000, to
prepare the initial inventory and source testing plan, to
participate in a cooperative joint powers source testing
agreement with several other California wastewater treatment
plants (POTWs) , and to conduct our own source testing as required
by AB 2588. This included an authorization of $100, 000 to
Malcolm Pirnie Engineers, to prepare the initial inventory and
source testing plan, and $750, 000 for the source testing
conducted under the joint powers agreement called PEEP (Pooled
Emissions Estimation Program) . This field testing, conducted
under the cooperative PEEP Program for emissions common to all
POTWs, as well as some of the special testing conducted for our
own sources, has been conducted by James M. Montgomery Engineers
(JMM) as the primary contractor for the PEEP Program.
The final work is now in progress for completing the source
testing to obtain toxic emission data from the various unit
processes within our treatment facilities. This part of the
AB 2588 work should be completed by the end of this calendar
year. The source testing data will provide the Sanitation
Districts with the concentrations of air toxics (if present)
.r contained in our various air streams.
Required Additional Tasks
As required by AS 2588 and the South Coast Air Quality Management
District (SCAQMD) , the Sanitation Districts must now complete a
pounds-per-day emissions estimate for each compound, in
accordance with SCAQMD guidelines. All the field data,
calculation results, facility diagrams and facility plot plans
will be combined into an "emissions inventory report. " The
report is scheduled to be submitted to the SCAQMD and the
California Air Resources Board (CARB) in early 1991. Also, a
human health risk assessment report must be conducted for each of
our two plants and submitted to SCAQMD no later than May 1, 1991.
In a September 20, 1990 staff report to the Executive Committee, _
Sanitation Districts' staff estimated that the emissions
inventory report and the health risk assessment report would each
cost approximately $250,000 to produce, or a total of an
additional $500,000. We noted, however, that there was a
possibility that incorporating the emissions inventory report and
the health risk assessment report under one contract could
streamline the effort of producing this information and save the
Sanitation Districts money.
In recent discussions with JMM, the principle contractor for the
PEEP project, the Sanitation Districts' staff developed a scope of work that would comply with the two last remaining tasks as
required under AB 2588, the inventory report and health risk
assessment report. Staff has conducted preliminary discussions
with JMM and believe the work can be completed for $398, 000.
The work would include:
1) Compilation of all field data.
2) Develop emission estimates for each compound in
accordance with procedures set forth in appropriate
SCAQMD guidelines.
3) Calculate specific emission factors based on the daily
mass emission rate, annual average emission rate and
maximum hourly emission rate.
4) Develop a data base for estimating emissions from each
source, using software packages compatible with
Sanitation Districts' equipment and protocols. The data
would also allow the input and extraction of relevant
data and presentation of graphics and statistical
analysis for the high degree of accuracy required.
5) Complete separate toxic inventory reports for Plants 1 &
2, following SCAQMD and CARB reporting forms. The -
reports would also include detailed facility plot plans,
facility description, process flow diagrams and other r..
relevant information.
6) Develop facilities modeling to be used for modeling the
source emissions and the meteorological and receptor
locations specific to each treatment plant.
7) Estimate the population within the zone of impact.
8) Perform a health risk assessment in accordance with
SCAQMD's protocols. The health risk assessment would
include maximum individual cancer risk and excess cancer
burden of the surrounding population, as well as on-site
employees. Health risk assessment would also include,
in the form of technical memoranda, prioritization of
sources within our facilities; and a listing of target
compounds of concern and possible process control
strategies to help us plan an emissions reduction
program.
9) Complete the emissions inventory report by February
11, 1991, and the health risk assessment report by
April 7 , 1991, to provide sufficient time to meet the
May 1, 1991 deadline imposed by AB 2588.
Recommendation
Sanitation Districts' staff believes that JMM is uniquely
qualified to perform this work because of their ongoing, state-
wide work on air toxics. They have performed the field testing
competently and have an excellent ongoing rapport with staff at
the SCAQMD.
Staff, therefore, recommends that the Selection Committee be
authorized to negotiate a professional services contract with
James M. Montgomery Engineers to complete the inventory report
and health risk assessment report tasks required under AB 2588
for Treatment Plants 1 & 2.
BPA:dms
REF #010135.RP
F - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
10BCC ELLIS AVENUE
o O.Box 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 8272E-8127
October 18, 1990 n1AI 9ee-2A11
REF 8091347.RP
STATUS REPORT
PERMIT ISSUANCE
FOR UNITED PHARMACY, INC.
PERMIT NO. 1-1-344
(FACILITY FORMERLY OWNED BY UNIVERSAL CIRCUITS)
The staff is preparing to issue a one-year Industrial Wastewater Discharge
Permit to United Pharmacy, Inc. , dba Universal Circuits, for a business
located in District No. I at 2249 South Yale Street, Santa Ana, California.
The facility at this location was previously owned, though never operated, by
Universal Circuits, Inc. UCI had been denied a renewal of a pre-existing
permit at an old facility on Newport Circle in Santa Ana (District No. 1) by
the Boards of Directors. The UCI application for their new facility on South
Yale Street had also been denied by the Districts' General Manager.
BACKGROUND
Based on sampling conducted in early 1989, the Districts' staff recommended
that the permit for UCI for their facility at 1800 Newport Circle, Santa Ana,
not be renewed. Downstream sampling showed 22 violations, including
discharges exceeding 118 milligrams per liter of copper for nearly 40 times
the allowable limit, and up to 13.75 pounds per day over their maximum daily
limit. The Districts' General Counsel also filed a suit against UCI seeking
civil penalties for their illegal discharges. Following administrative
hearings by the staff, UCI appealed the decision not to renew their permit to
the Executive Committee of the Boards of Directors in October, 1989. The
Executive Committee upheld the staff decision; however, UCI filed a suit in
Orange County Superior Court to prevent the District from terminating the
discharge at this facility.
UCI was also constructing a new facility at 2249 South Yale Street in Santa
Ana. Prior to consideration of issuing a permit to the new facility,
Universal was required to submit, as are all other permit applicants, a
complete permit application, reports, and drawings. The staff reviewed the
technical aspects of the wastewater characterization, spill containment, and
the pretreatment system proposed by Universal . The staff concluded that it
was reasonable to believe that if the system was constructed and installed in
accordance with the plans, design, and performance representations of UCI and
Memtek (the equipment supplier for the pollution control equipment) , and the
California Registered Engineers, Daniel Elliot and Will Lindsay (employed by
UCI to review the treatment system), and properly operated and maintained by
responsible management and qualified operators, compliance with the Districts'
regulations and permit conditions should be achieved.
d
UCI attempted to and succeeded in finding a buyer for their new facility. The
sale of the facility was made by United Pharmacy, Inc. (UPI) subject to
several conditions, some of which included that the performance of the
pretreatment system at full production would provide 100% compliance with the
District's discharge limitations and that the buyer, UPI could successfully
obtain a one-year permit from the District.
CURRENT STATUS
The Districts' staff and General Counsel prepared an interim permit for UPI
and included the standard conditions and limitations afforded all new Class I
industrial permittees, and a provision that County Sanitation District No. I
and UPI agree that neither UCI nor any of UCI's officers, directors, or
management employees shall in any manner be involved in the operation nor have-
financial interest in the printed circuit board facility on South Yale Street.
The Districts and UPI agreed that UCI's former General Manager could be
retained for a limited period of time to help in the transition of starting up
the new shop.
The Districts' staff has inspected UPI on a bi-weekly basis and collected
samples to determine the compliance with the discharge limitations contained
in the Class I permit 1-1-344. Five composite samples were collected and
found in compliance with the discharge limitations. UPI has also submitted
the information required by their permit condition and, as stipulated, they
have ceased to use UCI's former General Manager as of September 18, 1990.
�r
PERMIT ISSUANCE TO UPI
Because UPI has complied with the Districts' requests, and has been in
compliance with their discharge limitations and permit conditions, the staff
intends to issue a one-year Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit to UPI (see
Attachment A) .
RVL:cros
REF @091347.RP
2 v:
' hNttarrog COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
INDUSTRIAL WASTE DIVISION
•4ti�v 108" Ellis Awnue, Fountain Valley, California 92708 NO, 1-1-344
Telephones: Ares Code714-5403910-98b2411
"1 a DATE: 11-1-90
CLASS I PERMIT
�0 FOR DISCHARGE OF WASTEWATER
ISSUED BY
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.1
TO
NAME _ PHONE;.,; I�„�'.� SI* NUMBER Nrn =m
UNITED BHARMACY. .INC. 540—'3936 "3672
MAILING ADDRESS , NUMBER DAYS WORKEDIYEAR PERMIT FEE
xt y;3249„S. -Yale Street,-;Santa 9na;i,.CA 92704'?t.:- - 250
SERW 41ODRER$" .•�_y1 `e'-' R ."J . LOCAL SEWE R I NU AGE N CY NO.EMPLOYEES
�'<$` ,, '�`.-City :oY$arita?ADa.- •^109
FLOW MEASUREMENT BASED ON CONSUMPTION LESS �_ MILLION GALLONS/YEAR EXPIRATION DATE
Is Loss +'-.:10130191
AS REPORTED BY PERMITTEE
.METAL FINISHING, PENS PERMIT LIMITATIONS
M[4ApX7{ NTl�,y BASED ON 092MOD FLOW
CONSTITUENT LIWDay 10gIX MAX• MONTHLY AVG. MAX.
MO AVELONSTITUENT Lba/DaY N00C CONSTITUENT Lba/Dav MG/L
Arsenic 1.54 Lead 0,529 11-330 *ITO 0,445
Cadmium 0.084 0.054 Marl _O23
1.54 1.312 3eO5 1_83
lromiumlTmall— Niebl
Copper 2.30 1.59 silver 0.330 0_184
Lyenide(Totel) 3.84 27nc 2.00 1_14
DAILY MAX. MONTHLY AIG.
Cysnide(Fres) 0.761 HOD **CYANIDE (mg/L) n /L
(Total)
Oil or Ghana, —_ _ TES 1.20 0:65'
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
® Prior to Expanding Wet Process,the Districts Shell be Notified in Writing.
❑ Company is Required to Submit Self Monitoring Reports.
® Copies of Water and Tex Bills to be Submitted as Obtained.
*ITO — Total Toxic Organics. **Cyanide concentration limits apply at end of process
Limitation for PH; 6-12. Additional requirements are shown on Attachment "A".
Permit Issued Pursuant to the Wastewater Discharge Regulations.
THE NAMED PARTY IS HEREBY GRANTED PERMISSION TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER INTO THE SEWERAGE FACILITIES OF THE COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY. FEES, REQUIREMENTS, LIMITATIONS OR CONDITIONS IMPOSED BY THIS PERMITON DISCHARGE
OF WASTEWATER ARE AS LISTED ABOVE AND AS FOUND ON ANY ADDITIONAL ATTACHED PAGES.
I have rwiewad the permit in in entirety aid I underhand and agree to all parmh conditions
AIVCEDE WSEO and limitation,
vIwIG wte Invmce rvo.
X
AUMofiw Company OH/clot T/tle
fbn"al Na. Data Palo Che[k NO.
1— 41.15 Source Control Mgr.
AVMonzod QSD.O.0 SpnaOrn Titls
t
PER!AIT'T=_E I
INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER DISCHARGE
ATTACHMENT A TO PERMIT NO. 1-1-344
UNITED PHARMACY, INCORPORATED
This ATTACHMENT is a condition of PERMIT NO. 1-1-344 and the permittee is
required to comply with all the requirements set forth below:
SECTION 1: SELF-MONITORING
Permittee shall conduct self-monitoring of wastewater effluent on a weekly
basis to determine status of compliance/non-compliance with permitted limits.
Composite samples shall be taken from the sampling point authorized by the
Districts and analyzed for copper, lead, and pH. Based on the results,
permittee shall make all the necessary adjustments/corrections to bring the
wastewater discharge into immediate compliance. Self-monitoring shall be
conducted in accordance with the Districts' requirements specified below and
shall commence upon start-up of the wet manufacturing processes and the
pretreatment facility.
Requirements
The following are the self-monitoring specific requirements:
1. The permittee shall collect and analyze a sample of the wastewater
effluent (self-monitor) a minimum of 4 sampling days per month (once a
week). The sampling day shall be rotated to the successively different
plant operational day during each week of monitoring.
2. All effluent sampling must be conducted using an automatic sampling
device which is capable of collecting samples at a minimum of 15-minute
intervals during all hours of discharge at the sample point designated
by the Districts. The composite sample shall be analyzed for pH,
copper, lead, and any other heavy metal constituent known to be in the
discharge.
3. All wastewater samples shall be analyzed in accordance with the
appropriate procedures contained in 40 CFR 136 or the most current
edition of "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and
Wastewater". Wastewater analysis shall be performed by a laboratory
certified by the State of California for performing the analysis on the
required constituents, or by a laboratory approved by the Source Control
Manager. Upon the Districts' request, the laboratory shall furnish
information on the test methods or equipment used, including quality
assurance/quality control information, laboratory personnel conducting
and verifying the tests, and other information deemed necessary by the
Districts to determine the adequacy, accuracy, and precision of the
result.
1
4. The findings and the results of laboratory analysis shall be recorded in �..i
the wastewater treatment system log.
5. The permittee shall submit a monthly Self-Monitoring Report (SMR) due on
the 20th day of the following month. The attached SMR form shall be
completely filled out with copies of all laboratory results attached.
6. Prior to submittal of the SMR to the Districts, the results shall be
verified and signed by an authorized company official as defined by 40
CFR 403 under penalty of perjury.
The Districts shall not invoice non-compliance fees for discharge violations
based on self-monitoring, but may use the information to issue a notice of
violation or take other enforcement actions as necessary.
SECTION 2: OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (O/M) MANUAL
Permittee shall provide and maintain a copy of the Operation and Maintenance
(0/M) Manual to the Districts to ensure proper operation and maintenance of
the pretreatment system at all times. The 0/M Manual shall provide proper
guidance to the operator and shall be prepared in accordance with the
Districts' guidelines and submittal requirements.
SECTION 3: INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT OPERATOR
Permittee shall retain an industrial wastewater treatment operator(s) during
all operating hours to ensure proper operation and maintenance of the
pretreatment system and maintain compliance with discharge limits at all
times. The operator must meet the Districts' required qualifications
specified below.
Requirements
The primary responsibilities of the wastewater treatment operator shall be:
1. Operation of the continuous pretreatment system including maintenance of
equipment, calibration of measuring instruments such as pH and ORP
meters, preparation of chemicals and inventory control, maintenance of
operation logs to monitor pretreatment system performance, and
operations troubleshooting.
2. Operation of batch treatment system to treat spent chemicals and
dragouts accordingly, including wastehauling of sludges and non-
treatable wastes.
3. Take samples for laboratory analysis and prepare Self-Monitoring
Reports.
2
Any one of the following minimum qualifications for an industrial wastewater
treatment operator are considered acceptable by the Districts:
B.S. in Engineering or Chemistry
■ A.A. degree in chemistry and one year experience in wastewater
treatment
■ Two semesters of college chemistry and two years of experience in
wastewater treatment
■ Industrial Wastewater Treatment Operator Certificate from the
California Water Pollution Control Federation Association (CWPCA)
■ Train an individual in industrial wastewater treatment operations
who shall obtain a CWPCA Certification within a nine-month period.
Permittee shall be given a nine-month grace period to obtain a
certified operator. If no certified operator is obtained at the
end of the nine-month period, permittee shall be required to hire
a wastewater treatment operator with one of the other
qualifications mentioned above.
Upon the Districts' request, permittee shall submit a report stating the
qualifying experience and providing a copy of the Certificate/Diploma or a
list of the qualified operator's experience and education.
Failure to comply with Districts' requirement of retaining an operator who
meets the Districts' requirements is a violation of your permit.
The Districts shall be notified in writing immediately of a qualified
operator's termination of employment and the permittee shall have 45 days from
date of termination to employ another qualified operator. Failure to comply
with this requirement is a violation of your permit.
SECTION 4• LOG BOOK
Permittee must maintain a log book to record the pertinent operating
parameters and other maintenance work of the pretreatment equipment, the
volume of spent chemicals and sludge hauled off-site, the volume of spent
chemicals treated, and any analysis data for heavy metals and pH. The log
book shall begin with the first day of operation. The log book must be made
available for the Districts' review upon request.
SECTION 5: OTHER REQUIREMENTS
County Sanitation Districts No. 1 of Orange County, California and United
Pharmacy, Inc. agree that neither Universal Circuits, Inc. ("Universal ") nor
any of its former or current officers, directors, or its General Managers
shall in any manner be involved in the operation of nor have any financial
interest in the printed circuit board facility located at 2249 South Yale
�./ Street, Santa Ana.
3
J .
Upon discovery that Universal or any of its former or current directors,
officers, or General Manager are participating in the operation of or have any
financial interest in the printed circuit board facility located at 2249 South
Yale Street, Santa Ana, the parties hereto agree that this industrial
wastewater discharge permit shall be terminated immediately without notice and
hearing by the Districts' Board of Directors.
Authorized Company Signature Authorized CSDOC Signature
Title Title
Date Date
MT:tn
REF #ATT-A.MT
4
00
�4 KARALES
TANK FARM ® n'
Dai ® aW
v o;ti /'aa a
tR W
KARALES
D.W. ELLIOT /�� WELL ft 2
WELL * I
D.W. ELLIOT
WELL a 3ES
WELLL# I \
�Alt,
O.W. ELLIOT , ¢ W�LL«�
WELL % 4
KARALES
WELLS x i
9 F
WELLL*l2T¢ nit asas _�d4'rJW ¢
�I p
ni
} - —F/f — — BANNING -- -- AVVVEENNUE
a N/ rr�p5
_.f
z m n�' �� e
vit
y g��
Fit
W n��
11 °
�h
mOR1'i 8A*IT8S20/ OIeS/ICS/ O}
_ MASTER PLAN AND
OIL WELL INTERFERENCE PLAN
? EXHIBIT A
nium N.T.S.
aa® �wv
� o
jLL ` KARALE
TANK FARM
WY 606
GF ® mf
`( u
II +
D.W ELLIOT w KARALWELL E2
WELL *
O.W. ELLIOT ce y
WELL # 3
¢ I
W KARALES
/ ASPS \KARALE WELL R I
WELL R9
D.W. ELLIOT ARALES
WELL # 4 WELL
WE KARL S /
WELLLk I2T
---Nil/----- - - -------_ z
BANNING AVENUE
% y SECONDARY CLARIFIERS
RELATED FACILITIES
WOULD REQUIRE TOTAL
REDESIGN.
ti 0r
PROPOSED ROUTE IF OIL
n 0If ! �E WELLS ARE NOT ACQUIRED
pp ! WHICH WOULD FORCE
CHANGES IN THE MASTER
PLAN LAYOUT.
If SCALE- N.T.S.
NlN TATXON DlsS =s OT
a 0..NNN =v , Cl
MASTER PLAN AND
OIL WELL INTERFERENCE PLAN
EXHIBIT B 1
w .
October 17, 1990 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
.f ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
1e EWe AVENUE
Pn eon elV
REEN= OF THE FISCAL POLICY CCMMMEE wueruN VLL .CA FCN 9272"121
Meetin4 Date: October 17, 1990 0141e6e.e411
FISCAL POLICY COMhD.T=: OTHERS PRESENT:
Present: Director Evelyn Hart
Director Ruthelyn Plummer
William Mahoney, Chairman Director Grace Winchell
Don R. (Tiffin, Director Jeff Bower, Merrill Lynch
James Neal, Director Steve Coma, Merrill Lynch .
Peer Swan, Director Sam Corliss, Merrill Lynch
James Wahner, Director Thomas Woodruff, General Counsel
Absent: - STAFF PRESENT:
Wayne Silzel, Director J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
Wayne Wedin, Director Blake Anderson, Director of Technical Services
Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering
Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Ed Hodges, Senior Facilities Manager Maintenance
Bob Oaten, Assistant Director of Operations
Patricia Gorczyca, Financial Manager
1. ENGINEERING RM SCTEt=C IDYn 4 PROGRAM.
In March 1990, the Fiscal Policy Committee reviewed and recommended the
implementation of an Engineering and Scientific Intern Program to provide for
the hiring of college students part-time to help on specific projects and to
serve as a basis for helping to recruit future engineers and scientists to
work full-time for the Districts.
The program was approved by the Executive Committee and the Joint Boards, and
during this past summer nine engineering interns were hired from local
schools. The interns worked in the Operations and Maintenance office, the
Compliance Division, the Source Control Division and in Construction
Management and were quite productive and useful.
The original program authorization was for nine students to be employed
during the summer months for an estimated $50,000 and for three students to
work part-tine during the school year for an estimated $10,000 (see enclosed
pink staff report dated March 5, 1990).
Seven of the nine interns are available and willing to continue to work
part-time during the school year. All seven can be productively utilized by .
existing work requirements and properly supervised by existing staff.
(1 of 3)
Fiscal Policy Cammttee Report - -
October 17, 1990
Letter of Credit Bank
The use of variable interest rate COP's will require a letter of credit bank
to provide liquidity and assurance to the financial market that there will be
a buyer for their investments.
The Committee reviewed the proposals from eight letter of credit banks. All
of the banks contacted respoixted with proposa.la that reflect the quality of ..
.the proposed issue. After considsrinng the price of the service, the credit
strength of the banks, the terms of the proposal., and the imgaect of the
financial market's perception of the banks on trading and interest rates, the
Committee selected the Industrial Bask of Japan, Limited, to provide letter of
credit service.
Trustee Bank
The trustee bxanik makes payments to the COP holders when principal and interest
payments are due and maintains the records of ownership. The trustee bank
selection is less complex than the letter of credit bank and is based mainly
on the price proposed and the experience of the bank. Because this issue is
proposed to be a variable rate issue with daily trading, experience with this
mode was very important. The Committee selected Texas (Ymmarro Bank from the
nine banks that submitted proposals for trustee services.
R ccuuendation
In summery, the Fiscal Policy Committee recommends the following actions
relative to the initial 1990-91 borrowing:
1. Approve issuance of $100 million variable rate certificates of
participation with a 25 year maturity as the first phase of a
,long-term financial plan.
2. Authorize staff and counsel to negotiate and execute a contract with
the huT,ntrial Bank of Japan, Limited, for letter of credit bank
services.
3. Authorize staff and counsel to negotiate and execute a contract with
Texas C®erce Bank for trustee services.
lr/
(3 of 3)
. Fiscal Policy Ca mittee Report
October 17, 1990
The staff therefore recommended that Resolution No. 90-26 approvi ig the
Hng neerirxf and Scientific Intern Program be amended to increase the
authorized anm,al coat from $60,000 to $105,000 to allow IlIDre utilization of
the interne daring the school year.
Reconmiendation
The C®ittee ccncuxa with the staff recommandatiotn.
2. DE9T FINATC NG PROGRAM rTiTmrnr. ISSUE RI IDATIDr6.
Initial Offering and Terms
The financial team of staff and consultants reviewed the financial plan
proposed in the "2020 VISION" Master Plan, progress to date and the calendar
of remaining events. The financing efforts are on schedule in accordance with
the previous Beard approvals and attached (blue) calendar and schedule and
will culminate approximately November 20, 1990, with the final pricing and
sale.
The Committee and the financial team reviewed the enclosed information book
which outlines the recce initial issue. The recommended $100 million
initial issue will be the first step to implement a three-fold reserve policy
to provide funding for future projects, to max;m;xe interest earning, and to
stabilize and minimize user fees. A large portion, $63 million, Of the first
�J issue is proposed to replenish beginning capital reserves for progress made
daring the financing process. The $37 million balance would partially finance
ongoing master-plaiined capital Projects.
The initial issue is proposed to be the first of two in 1990-91, with a
subsequent issue next spring. Two issues are recommended because the
Districts are not yet well known in the financial market; and too large of an
initial issue would present more risk exposure to the rating agencies, the
banks and the Districts. After our reputation and presence are established,
future borrowing will be easier and more economical . Split or sequential
issues also provide an opportunity to alter the mix of the overall borrowing
structures and the ratio of fixed and variable debt to take advantage of
Current market conditions and economic trends.
The structure and to ms of the initial issue, mmmari zed on the attached Term
Of Proposed Issuance (green), were presented by the financial team. The
initial issue is proposed to be a $100 million certificate of participation
offering for 25 years. These COP's are recaomended to be issued with a
variable interest rate, since this results in a lower total cost and allows
the Districts to maximize interest earnings during the construction period.
The Districts are protected from significant increases in the interest rate by
the investment of offsetting reserve funds.
(2 of 3)
March 5, 1990
STAFF REPORT
ENGINEERING AND SCIENTIFIC INTERN PROGRAM
The purpose of this report is to request authorization for an Engineering and
Scientific Intern Program. The Districts are finding it hard to adequately
staff all of our positions because technical talent is becoming increasingly
difficult to find and attract to this area. Staff is therefore proposing this
program for the Engineering, Technical Services and the Operations and
Maintenance Departments to hire engineering and science students to work at the
Districts during the summer and during the school year. Work at the Districts
as an intern will acquaint potentially employable students with the Districts
and provide the Districts with an opportunity to evaluate prospects for future
engineering and science positions.
The authorization is being requested at this time to allow the Districts to
participate ,in the local college work programs and take advantage of summer
availability of engineering and science students. The work to be performed by
.the interns will consist of engineering field work, treatment plant process
evaluation, literature search, research, ocean monitoring field work, water
conservation, reclamation and sludge management projects.
Staff contacted other wastewater agencies and consulting firms to assess what
level of pay would be compatible for Engineering Interns. Based an our survey
it is proposed that a sliding scale be used for interns based on years of
schooling. The schedule would be as follows:
Maximum
Class Hourly Rate
Sophomore $ 9.00
Junior $10.00
Senior $11.00
Post Graduate $16.00
Anticipated annual costs for wages for nine part-time engineering and scientific
intern positions are estimated to be less than $60,000. The costs are estimated
based on $50,000 for nine students employed twelve weeks each during the summer,
and $10,000 for students working part-time through the school year.
The interns will be assigned as follows:
Number
Department of Positions
Operations and Maintenance 3
Technical Services 4
Engineering 2
Total Number of Positions 9
In summary, staff is requesting authorization to hire Engineering and Scientific
Interns to provide a pool of technical talent that will do productive short term
projects, and are likely to consider working for the Districts in the future.
/or
As of October 4, 1990
October 1990 November 1990
Ll 2 4 5 6 S M 13M T 2 3
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 29 30
Date Event Responsibilities
10/10/90 -Documents meeting(9:00 a.m.) All Parties
-LOC Bank selected by Finance Team for presentation CSDOC
to Board
-Board meeting(no action) All Parties
10/11/90 -Legal documents distributed All Parties
-Draft of Preliminary Official Statement(P.O.S.)circulated MLCM,UC
10/17/90 -Financing recommendations&rating agency presentation CSDOC,MLCM,GC,BC
outline presented to Fiscal Policy Committee
10/22/90 -Documents meeting(9:00 a.m.) All Parties
-Draft rating agency presentation reviewed A0 Parties
-Printer selected CSDOC,MLCM
10/24/90 -Fiscal Policy Committee presents Financing recommendations
to Executive Committee;P.O.S.Approval
err/ 10/26/90 -Revised documents circulated MLCM,BC,UC
10/29/90 - Rating agency presentation dress rehearsal(9:00 a.m.) All Parties
11/01/90 -Presentation to Moodys All Parries
11/06/90 -Presentation to Standard&Pcoes All Parties
11/12/90 -Ratings received MLCM
-P.O.S.to printer MLCM,UC
11/13/90 -P.OS.available to underwriter for distribution MLCM
-Premarketing of issue commences MLCM
11/14/90 -Board Meeting
-Approve legal documents
-Preliminary Pricing(Pricing call) CSDOC,MLCM
11/20/90 -Final Pricing and Sale(Fixed or Variable Rate) CSDOC,MLCM
-Closing(Variable Rate)
11/26/90 -Preclosing(Fixed Rate)
11/27/90 -Closing(Fixed Rate)
CSDOC County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Board: CSDOC Board of Ditecton
BC Rourkeand woodruff UC Orrick Herrington
BC Mudge Rose T. Trustee
MLCM: Merrill Lynch Capital Marken
`/
As of October 4, 1990
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
1990 Financing
Financing Schedule
Augast 1990 September 1990 October 1990
S M r 3m T E S SMIWIEE S M T W T E g
1 2 3 4 1 1 2 3 4 5 6
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 7 8 9 30 11 12 13
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 28 29 30 31
30
Date Event Responsibilities
Completed -Selection of Underwriter Finance Committee
Completed -Board approves Underwriter&Counsel Board
Completed -Initial meeting and tour of facilities All Parties
Completed -Meeting to review structure&financial alternatives All Parties
Completed -Review of cashflow timing CSDOC,MLCM
Completed -Board meeting
�s
Completed -Financing alternatives evaluated by Finance Team&preliminary CSDOC, MLCM
structure determined
Completed -Finalize Board workshop presentation CSDOC,MLCM
Completed -Preliminary meeting with Rating Agencies CSDOC,MLCM
Completed -Board workshop All Panics
Completed -Strategic Overview presented to Fiscal Policy CSDOC,MLCM
Committee
Completed -Initial documents meeting All Parties
- Finance team sets date for review by Rating Agencies
for early November
Completed -Letter of Credit (LOC) RFP sent out MLCM
-Trustee RFP sent out
Completed -Executive Committee meeting CSDOC, MLCM
Completed -Drafts of legal documents distributed MLCM,BC,UC
-Preparation for Rating Agency presentations begins CSDOC,MLCM
Completed -Documents meeting All Parties
10/05/90 -LOC RFPs due back and evaluated MLCM
-Trustee RFYs due back and evaluated
Terms of Proposed Issuance
i Mssral Policy Committee
October 17,1990
Sizing Characteristics:
Size of Issue: $100,000,000
Final Maturity. 2015
Interest Rate: Variable(Daily Mode)
Capitalized Interest: NO
Uses of Funds:
Net Deposit to Construction Fund' $35,160,47050
Debt Service Reserve Requirement 0.00
Costs of Iu u mce/Underwriters'Discom t 1,300,000.00
Reserves Replenished 63,538,000.00
Rounding Amount L529.50
Total Uses $100,000,000.00
•See breakdown of Construction Projects on following page.
Credit Characteristics:
Lien: Subordinate
LOC Rank Enhanced: YES
Debt Service Reserve Fund NO
Debt Service Coverage: 1:1
Rate Covenant YES—Covenant to Levy Charges
Equal to Debt Service
,'wool
Revised 11/07/90
Breakdown by District of
Use of Construction Proceeds and Reimbursements
Estimated
Project Average
Funding Annual
Requirements Debt service
District Projects (R Million)* (R)
1 Percentage of Joint works and 9.26 775,000
Reserve Reimbursement
2 -Percentage of Joint Works and 26.25 2,195,000
Reserve Reimbursement
3 Percentage of Joint Works and 28.37 2,375,000
Reserve Reimbursement
5 Percentage of Joint Yorke and 8.48 710,000
Reserve Reimbursement and
5-34, 5-34-1, 5-34-2, and
5-34-3
6 Percentage of Joint Works and 6.92 580,000
Reserve Reimbursement
7 Percentage of Joint Works and 9.81 820,000
Reserve Reimbursement
11 Percentage of Joint Works and 8.57 715,000
Reserve Reimbursement
13 Percentage of Joint Works 0.34 30,000
14 Percentage of Joint Works 2.00 165,00D
tlnitiat Issuance for 2n4 and 3rd quarters of FY 90/91 and Reimbursement
2/GGs10.17.4
/1
_ l 1
Presentation to
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
%l to*
A
�Nna co�"t+
Fiscal Policy Committee
October 17, 1990
Merrill Lync>)Capital Markets
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
CSDOC Reserve Policy
Revenues
Reserve Requirements:
Goal Current
Renewal &
Replacement: $100 MM $53 MM
Renewal & Capital Environmental
Replacement Projects Requirements Capital
(Current Policy) (2 yrs of funding) (All Expected Req.) Projects: $200 MM $162 MM*
Environmental
Requirements: $100 MM $0
Subtotal: $400 MM $235 MM
Fee Stab.Fund: $0 $ 0
Grand Total: $400 MM $235 MM
Fee Stabilization * Includes$119 MM Current
Fund + $63 MM Reimbursed
(unfunded)
resentation to Fiscal Policy Committee e 1
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Initial Issuances
. Two Phases
. Fall Issuance Will Be Approximately
$100 million
. Subsequent Issuance(s) to Finance Remainder
of FY 90-91/FY 91-92 Capital Needs
resentalion to Fiscal Policy Committee �e 2
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Two-Phased Issuance
300 iI $292 MM
_'Trunk Sewer
250t Projects
II $ 198 MM
200
;:,ital Cosl.s
i, mange 150 } .doinL Works
I \. ii , 1 > , u $Millions) I Projects
$100 MM
100 f C01
50 � Reserves
Reimbursed
0 ' - -+- - --- - - t- -'-
F'Y90 91 /91 92 Full 1990 Subsequent.
Capilai Needs issuance 1991
issuance
Presentation io Fiscal Policy Committee Pa 3
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Components of Fall Issuance
$100 MM K;osl- of I��uanc o
-
uu
90 . runk Sewer Pro'ects
Ho
oint Works Pro'ect
70
Capital Costs 60
to Finance
(Arms in $Millions) 50
40 --
Reserves Reimbursed
:in k
i
zo }
�0 i
Fall 1990
issuance
\Presentation to Fiscal Policy Committee Pag•
1
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Rationale For Fall Issuance
. CSDOC's First Issuance In 4 Years
. Prudent Size For Rating Agencies
. Prudent Size For LOC Banks
resentation to Fiscal Policy Committee Page 5
l
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Credit Terms Of Fall Issuance
. Variable Rate
. LOC Bank Enhanced
. Final Maturity of 2015
. Subordinate Lien
. No Capitalized Interest
. No Debt Service Reserve Fund
. Debt Service Coverage of 1:1
. Covenant To Levy Charges To Equal Debt Service
-1'resentalion to Fiscal Policy Committee P 6
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Rationale For Subsequent Issuances)
. Meet Project Funding Requirements
. Take Advantage of Arbitrage Opportunities
. Take Advantage of any Interest Rate
Opportunities
. Utilize Enhanced Market Presence
resenlation to Fiscal Policy Committee Pa_
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Arbitrage Advantage
Arbitrage Mules Allow Present Value Debt Service Savings
140 1
$ 131 MM
130
l '2 h Vl M
Present Value
)ebt Service`
(a) 10% t'LO
( Ainis In $Millions)
io
1001-- - -
Separate PY Issuances One time ( 1 ) Issuance
• Assumes Slbn Million Issuance.
Pmsentalion to Fiscal Policy Committee Pa 8
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Interest Rate Fluctuation
historical Tax—Exempt Rates
January 1986 to Present
11
Long-Term (Fixed)
to Tax-Exempt Rate
Maxlmurrl = 9. 17
95"Average
e
Weekly JAverage
Yields
5 (Variable )
mpt. Rate.m - 7 75
4m :3.56
Average = h 47
01/02/e6 12/04/ee 11/06/07 10/ae/ee 09/07/e9 011i2oi9c
Presentation to Fiscal Policy Committee Page9
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Fixed/Variable Rate Mix
Longer Maturities Generally have higher Yields
7.5 r
i
Yield for 7.0 t I Short—Term
Maturity I Rates
in a /
IndiccaLeted 65
6.0 } I InLermediaLe I Long 'I'errn
Term Rates I Rates
5.5
0 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 r9
Year of Maturity,
(Shown as Years from Issue Dale)
Presentation to Fiscal Policy Committee Page100
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Variable Rate Capacity
Total Reserves vs. FY 90-91/FY 91 -92 Bonding Needs
too
90
60
70 Variable
--Rate
60 Debt
(Amts in $Millions) 50
' 'i Xcd
40 To to 1
30 Reservr-
20
r
10 - -1
1 2 3 5 6 7 11 1 :1 ' '1
District
Presentation to Fiscal Policy Committee l Page 11
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Credit Terms of Subsequent Sr. Lien
Issuance(s)
Option 1 Oration 2 Option 3
Obligation Type COPs COPS COPs
Coverage Ratio 1.00 1.25 1.25
Additional
Bonds Test None Yes Yes
Rate Covenant Yes Yes Yes
Reserve Fund Yes Yes Yes*
* Covenant to replenish by all Districts.
resenlallon to Fiscal Policy Comminee _ 12
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Rating Agency Presentation Outline
. Presentation Team
. Overview of CSDOC
. CSDOC Goals and Policies
. CSDOC Organizational Structure
. Summary of Current Facilities
. Summary of 20/20 Vision Plan
. Financial Summary
. Issuance in FY 90-91
Presentalion to Fiscal Policy Committee [3
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
LOC Bank Selection Criteria
. Price
. Credit Strength
. Term
resenlation to Fiscal Policy Commillee _ _ 14
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
LOC Bank Recommendation
Credit Uppfront Annual
Bank Rating Fee(s) Term Fee
The Fuji Aa1/AA Legal Fees 5 Years 20 25
Bank, & Expenses or 20 30
Limited 10 Years 20 We
25 2-9)
25 35
National Aaa/AA+ Legal Fees 10 Years 30 b.p.
Westminster & Expenses
Bank PLC Capped at
$43,000
Industrial Aaa/AAA Legal Fees 10 Years 30 b.p.
Bank of & Expenses
Japan, Capped at
Limited $40,000
•esenlalion to Fiscal Policy Commillee
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Trustee Bank Selection Criteria
. Price
. Experience
rresentalion to Fiscal Policy Committee 16
_
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Trustee Bank Recommendation
Acceptance Annual
Bank Fee Fee
Security Pacific $5,300 $79500
National Bank
Texas $79500 $79500
Commerce Bank
resenlation to Fiscal Policy Committee ___ 17
RE; AGENDA ITEM NO. 15 COUNTY SANITATION DISTFUCTS
of ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA
1O EL AWNM
October 30, 1990 P.M mmz 91"
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,C KMNIAp8% QIV
91QM1 11
REPORT OF THE FISCAL POLICY CCY4.IITrEE
Meetinn Date: October 30, 1990
FISCAL POLICY CmII=: OTHERS PRI TP:
Present: Thomas Woodruff, General Counsel
William Mahoney, chairman STAFF PFIB E •
Don R. Griffin, Director
James Neal, Director Tom Dames, Director of Engineering
Peer San, Director Gary Streed, Director of Finance
James Wahner, Director Patricia Gorczyca, Financial Manager
Dan Dillon, Accounting Manager
Absent: Bob Geggie, Accountant
Wayne Silzel, Director
Wayne Wedin, Director
1. ANNUAL AUDIT REPORT AM MANAGMW LE77.'ER EM YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1990.
Staff reviewed the draft Audit Report for the year ended June 30, 1990 and
noted that once again the auditor's opinion expressed no defects in procedures
or control. The Cc m ttee reviewed the notes to the Report and significant
changes since last year.
Peggy McBride, the audit partner from Peat Marwick, then delivered the firm's
Audit Report to the Audit CoRuittee in accordance with SAS 61 and discussed
the three comments in the management letter (gray) and staff's response
(white). She noted that these were not major concerns but were areas of
recommended policy changes that the Directors should be aware of.
The Conaittee approved the draft Audit Report and requested the auditor to
mail it directly to the Board Members for consideration at the November
regular. meeting.
2. DEBT FINAW NG PROGRAM INMUAL ISSUE.
For several months the Fiscal Policy Committee has been working to implement
the debt financing provisions of the Districts' long-range financial plan
approved aster p the �s ed 1989 as part of the 30-year wastewater 2020 VISIICN." The Directors tutors will recall thatthe
"2020 VISION" Financial Plan recommended a change from pay- ycu-go
(ccnnecti.on fee) financing) to a combination of pay- you-go and debt
financing for capital improvements.
Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee `. - - .•
Page 2
October 30, 1990
The Committee has submitted several recommendations which the Executive
Committee has endorsed and which have been adopted by the Boards. These
actions include:
. Addition of a Financial Manager to staff in lieu of using a consultant
financial advisor.
. Determination to negotiate the debt issue transactions.
• Selection of Merrill Lynch as Senior Underwriter.
. Selection of Mx1ge Rose as Co-Special Counsel with Rourke and
Woodruff.
In addition, the Committee has expanded its membership to include
representatives from each District when discussing debt issues; and has
sponsored a Directors debt financing workshop which was attended by
twenty-five Board members,
At the October 17th meeting, the Fiscal Policy Committee considered the
specific size and terms of the initial borrowing scheduled for November 1990.
The Committee's ration was forwarded to the Executive Committee and
can be found in that Committee's October 24, 1989 report to the Boards, but is
summarized as:
. $100 Million Certificates of Participation (Capital Improvement
Program, 1990-92 Series A):
District No. Amount
1 $ 9,260,000
2 26,250,000
3 - 28,370,000
5 8,480,000
6 6,920,000
7 9,810,000
11 8,570,000
13 340,000
14 2,000,000
$100,000,000
- Variable Interest Rate
- 25-Year Maturity
. Reimburse Reserves for 1989-90 Capital Outlay.
. Subsequmrt 1990-91 Issue in the Spring 1991.
. Use industrial Bank of Japan (1w) for Letter of Credit.
(Note: I8J subsequently requested a reserve clause which the financial
team believes is unwarranted and thus the Committee is r'econoending
National Westminster Bank - see below.) -
. Use Texas Commerce Bank as Trustee for an annual administration fee of
$7,500 plus annual transaction fees estimated to range between $15,000
- $25,000.
Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee
Page 3
October 30, 1990
Resolutions have been prepared for consideration by each District (see
enclosed pink sample) to implement the recommendations. There are several
actions included in the resolution which are necessary fora variable interest
rate transaction and which delegate SQL authority within parameters set by
the Hoards. They include:
. Approve several agreements which are on file in the Board Secretary's
office and will be available at the Board meeting:
- Trust Agreement - Instructions for Trustee Bank.
- Acquisition Agreement - Each District agrees to fund project.
- Assignment Agreement - Allows Trustee to pay investors.
- Purchase Contract - Promise by Merrill Lynch to buy COPS.
- Remarketing Agreement - Compensates Merrill Lynch for selling
COPS periodically as interest rates and investors change.
- PRimburcmront Agreement - Terms of letter of Credit.
. Authorize execution and delivery of COPS.
. Authorize the General Manager and Counsel to complete the above
documents subsequent to the negotiation process and the following
limits:
- Maximum principal not to exceed $100 million.
- Initial interest rate not to exceed 8%.
- The Underwriter's discount shall not exceed .595% ($5.95 per $1,000
see attached blue report).
- The letter of Credit Hank fee shall not exceed -.30% ($3.00 per
$1,000) per annum of the amount of such letter.
- Term shall not exceed 25 years (August 1, 2015).
. Approve and authorize distribution of the Preliminary Official
Statement.
. Approve and authorize distribution of the Preliminary and the Final
Official Statement.
. Appoint Texas Commerce Bank National Association as Trustee.
. Appoint National Westminster Bank, PLC as Letter of Credit Bank (in
place of the originally recc,me,aed industrial Bank of Japan with which
term could not be reached) .
• Auth.,rizes execution of necessary docents to effect the transactions.
Although this sees to be a very complex Resolution with numerous actions,
approvals old authorizations, it wraps up the Board actions into one package and
is the final action required. .
Upon approval by the respective Hoards, the financial team will proceed to take
the initial issue to market for inplementation of the long-range capital and
�I financial plans included in the "2020 VISION" Master Plan. A report on the
marketing will be made to the full Boards at the December meeting.
FIN/HC.IUM/BC11.14.3
COUNTY SANRATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA
10E00 EWE Av M
one 8121
October 30, 1990 MW.NVAu ..o Mw azn 'V
a141M44n
MEMORANDUM
To: Fiscal Policy Committee
From: Gary- Streed, Director of Finance -
Subject: EPMG - Peat Marwick Audit Management Letter
Enclosed herewith is the annual management letter submitted by
the auditors as a part of the 1989-90 audit. We are pleased to
report that KPMG noted no matters of material weakness involving
internal control during their audit for the year ended June 30,
1990.
One of the auditor's responsibilities is to comment upon and make
recommendations that may improve internal control or other phases
of financial operations. The management letter makes some
recommendations regarding Fixed Asset, Bad Debt and 1986
.`, Certificate of Participation procedures. Accordingly, the
purpose of this memo is to advise the Committee of the actions
that staff is taking to implement KPMG's recommendations.
I. Fixed Assets - Construction in Progress ICU) - Review
C.I.P. on a regular basis for transfer to fixed assets in
order to record depreciation expense in the proper period.
This is a carryover from last year and we will still expect
to achieve KPMG's recommendations as agreed to previously by
the end of fiscal year 1990-91. A review follows:
Fixed Asset Close Out: Construction projects of the last
decade have been significant both in number and dollars.
Even when a major construction contract is complete all of
the costs related to the project have not necessarily been
incurred and therefore, the project is not always ready to
be immediately capitalized. There are finishing costs not
related to the original contract, inspection labor and other
costs that lag after completion. All of these are a part of
the costs of placing the asset in service and should be
capitalized. Once a project- is deemed to be complete, the
analysis which enables a transfer to fixed assets begins. A
large project often has hundreds of components that need to _
be capitalized as separate units or processes. The analysis
i
Fiscal Policy Committee
Page 2
- October 30, 1990
associated with capitalizing these units is very time
consuming and an additional position was approved in the
1990-91 personnel budget to assist the Fixed Asset
Accountant with these duties. The position was filled and
has had a very positive impact toward the recommendations
made by RPMG. At this time, we are expecting to be in
compliance by the end of March 1991.
Depreciation: The Districts do not fund depreciation as a
matter of policy. That is, during the budget process no
monies are allocated for this purpose and set aside in a
reserve fund. Rather, through long-range financial planning
and action we provide the necessary resources to finance our
facilities construction program.
We do, however, record depreciation on all fixed assets in
the fixed assets sub-ledger. The summary amount of Joint
and District depreciation is reported in the general ledger
for financial statement presentation.
When C.I.P. is not transferred to fixed assets in the period
it is deemed complete, depreciation is understated for that
period. Likewise, when C.I.P. from a previous period is
transferred to fixed assets, the depreciation in that period
is from the date of completion and is overstated for the
period. In all subsequent periods depreciation on that
asset is reported correctly. The overall impact on the
financial statements for the two periods is nominal.
II. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts - Establish an allowance for
doubtful accounts. The Districts' current bad debt policy
does not provide for an allowance for doubtful accounts, but
rather establishes very specific procedures to be followed
in administering and collecting outstanding accounts
receivable. Staff will implement EPMG's recommendation to
establish an allowance for doubtful accounts.
III. Certificates of Participation - Installment payments are
made to the trustee twice annually as called for in the
agreement. Staff has consistently treated each installment
payment in accordance with the level-debt amortization
schedule provided which indicates an amount to be applied to .
principal with each payment. However, the reality is that
principal is only paid once annually by the trustee and the
Fiscal Policy Committee
Page 3
October 30, 1990
installment is held as a deposit until the debt service
date. KPMG's recommendation is to record the first
installment as a deposit and to subsequently reduce this
deposit when the second installment, and the payment to bond
holders, is made on the debt service date. This treatment
will avoid understating C.O.P. 's payable and also recognizes
our deposit with the trustee even though the funds could not
be recovered by the Districts. Staff will implement this
recommendation although the books will look the same at
year-end.
The Committee can be assured that we remain committed to strong
internal control and to improving financial operating
efficiencies. We take KPMG's recommendations seriously and will
endeavor to make changes as deemed appropriate.
GS:DD:lc
G SCOS.FP[
`r/
October 15, 1990
comPTOmwTTAL
The Board of Directors
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain valley, California 92728
near Board Members:
we have audited the combined financial statements of the County Sanitation
Districts of Orange County (the "Districts") for the year ended June 30, 1990
and have issued our report thereon dated September 28, 1990. In planning and
performing our audit of the financial statements of the Districts we
considered its internal control structure in order to determine our auditing
procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial
statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control structure. We
have not considered the internal control structure since the date of our
report.
We noted no matters involving the internal control structure and its operation
that we consider to be material weaknesses defined as follows. A material
weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of the specific
internal control structure elements does not reduce to a relatively low level
the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts that would be material in
relation to the financial statements being audited may occur and not be
detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of
performing their assigned functions. Our consideration of the internal
control structure would not necessarily disclose all matters in the internal
control structure that might be material weaknesses under standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
During our audit, we noted certain matters involving the internal control
structure and other operational matters that are presented for your
consideration. We would like to stress that these comments are critical in
nature and do not include comments on the many internal control features
present in the Districts' operations. These comments and recommendations, all
of which have been discussed with the appropriate members of management, are
intended to improve the internal control structure or result in other
operating efficiencies and are summarized in the remainder of this letter.
Observation
Although improvement was noted from prior year, the construction in. progress
\/ account was not reviewed on a regular basis to identify, completed assets
placed in service which should have been reclassified to their appropriate
fixed asset category. Additionally, once the assets were properly
The Hoard of Directors DRAFT
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
October 15, 1990
Page 2 r
classified to the appropriate fixed asset category, the associated accumulated
depreciation expense was recorded as of the transfer date rather than the date
the asset was placed in service. The effect of this treatment is to record
depreciation from asset completion to the transfer date all in one year
thereby overstating depreciation in the current period.
R o� nendatin
Construction in progress account activity, including additions and transfers
to appropriate fixed asset accounts, should be analyzed and reviewed on a
monthly basis. Depreciation expense should be recorded beginning the first
year the asset is placed in service in order to properly match the current
year expense against the current year asset usage.
g nefi
Monthly review of the construction in progress account will ensure the
accounting records are maintained on a basis consistent with generally
accepted accounting principles. This procedure will also minimize the
potential for year-end adjustments and improve financial reporting.
ALLOWAVC6 FOR DOR9TFRL ACCOIIwTa
nba rva ion
The Districts do not have a formal bad debt policy covering an allowance for
doubtful accounts.
R romm
There are several methods the Districts can implement for estimating bad _
debts:
• Income statement method--based on a percentage of the dollar volume
of operating revenues.
• Accounts receivable method--based on a percentage of the aged
accounts receivable; or
• Specific account method--based on specifically identified
uncollectible accounts plus a general allowance based on a past
write-off history.
Due to the nature of the Districts' operations we recommend the use of the
specific account method; however, once implemented, this method should be
reviewed periodically to determine its adequacy in light of actual District
experience. When an account is determined to be uncollectible, it should be
approved by the Accounting Manager and then written off directly to the
allowance account. A detail listing of accounts written off should be
maintained to assist in further collection efforts and to provide a "track
record- for District bad debt history.
The Board of Directors
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
October 15, 1990 DRAFT
Page 3
Benefit
The implementation of these procedures would result in better matching of
revenues with the related costs of producing those revenues; and, in addition,
provide better control over potential problem receivables.
CERTSFffiaTES OF PARTTCIDATSON
Dhaecvation
The certificates of participation trust agreement requires Districts Nos. 11
2, and 3 to deposit one-half of the subsequent years annual principal
installment in a separate "installment payment-principal- account with Bank of
America, the trustee. During our testwork, we noted that these funds
deposited with Bank of America were not recorded as cash in the general ledger
but were accounted for as if the installment payment had already been made.
As a result, cash and certificates of participation ,payable were understated
at June 30, 1990.
Recommendation
Although the funds deposited with Bank of America represent restricted cash to
be used for the certificates of participation annual principal installment
payment, it should not be recorded in the general ledger until the required
principal installment is actually made by the trustee in accordance with the
trust agreement.
Ben.fit
Recording cash deposited in the "installment payment-principal" account in the
general ledger will ensure the Districts' financial position is accurately
presented.
We welcome the opportunity to discuss this letter with you at your
convenience. we would like to take this opportunity to express our gratitude
for the courtesy and cooperation extended to us during this year's
examination.
Very truly yours,
RESOLUTION NO. 90- -
APPROVING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, 1990-92 SERIES A
CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION PURSUANT TO ADOPTED LONG-RANGE
FINANCIAL PLAN
A uw UTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT NO. _ OF ORANGE COUNTY, CAL]TWU A, AUMMUZING
THE PREPARATION, EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF NOT TO
$100,000,000 AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMRAIP OF CERTIFICATES OF
PARTICIPATION (Capital Improvement Program, 1990-92 Series A);
APPROVING A TRUST AGREEMENT, AGREEMNT FOR ACQUISITION AND
CONSTRUCTION, ASSIM ENT AG[a_MENT, PURCHASE CONTRACT,
RM-1ARMPIIiG AG MvENT, REIFIBURSEMENT AGREEMENT, PREMMUaRY
OFFICIAL STATEMENT AND THE DISTRIBUTION THEREOF, AND CERTAIN
ACTIONS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; AND APPOINTING NATIONAL
WBDM61ER HANK PIC, SAN FRANCISCO OVERSEAS BRANCH AS IMMM
OF CREDIT BANK AND TEXAS CMEWE HANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS
TRUSTEE
WHEREAS, this Cauaty Sanitation District of Orange County, California
(the "District") proposes to acquire, construct and install certain iuprOVe01P.nts
to joint facilities and certain other public improvements (the "Projects"); and
WAS, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California
(the "Districts") propose to finance the acquisition, construction and
installation of the Projects; and
WHEREAS, it has been proposed that the District acquire, construct and
install the Projects pursuant to an Agreement for Acquisition and Construction,
dated as of November 1, 1990, by and among the Districts (the "Acquisition
Agreement"), the proposed farm of which has been presented to this Board of
Directors, pursuant to which the Districts will agree to make certain
installment payments (the "Installment Payments") in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, it has been proposed that the District grant, assign and
transfer all of its rights to receive the Installment Payments to Texas
C„mmenoe Bank National Association, as trustee (the "Trustee") pursuant to an
Assignment Agreement, dated as of November 1, 1990, by and among the Districts
and the Trustee (the "Assignment Agreement"), the proposed form of which has
been presented to this Board of Directors; and
WAS, the Districts have determined that it would be in the best
interest of the Districts and the residents within the Districts to authorize,
pursuant to the Trost Agreement, dated as of November 1, 1990, among the Trustee
and the Districts (the "Trust Agreement"), the proposed form of which has been
presented to this Hoard of Directors, the preparation, execution and delivery by
the Trustee of Certificates of Participation (Capital Improvement Program,
1990-92 Series A) in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $100,000,000
(the "Certificates"), which Certificates evidence and represent direct and
proportionate interests in the Principal Copmnents and Interest Components of
the Installment Payments; and
-1-
Section 2: That this Board of Directors hereby authorizes the
preparation, execution and delivery of the Certificates in accordance with
the tenml9 and provisions of the Trust Agreement (as executed and delivered).
Section 3: The agreements referred to in Section 1 of this ...
Resolution shall, when executed and delivered pursuant to Section 1 of this
Resolution, contain such additions and changes as shall have been approved
by the General Manager of the Districts (or, in the absence of the General
Manager, the Director of Finance) (the "Manager"), subject to the following
limitations:
(a) the aggregate principal amount of the Certificates shall not
exceed $100,000,000, and the aggregate principal amount of
the Installment Payments of the District shall not exceed
the amount set forth with respect to the District in the
following schedule:
District No. Principal Amoumt
1 . . . . . . . . $ 9,260,000
2 . . . . . . . . $26,250,000
3 . . . . . . . . $28,370,000
5 . . . . . . . . $ 8,480,000
6 . . . . . . . . $ 6,920,000
7 . . . . . . . . $ 9,810,000
11 . . . . . . . . $ 8,570,000
13 . . . . . . . . $ 340,000
14 . . . . . . . . $ 2,000,000
(b) the initial interest rate with respect to the Certificates ..�
shall not exceed 8.00%;
(c) the annual fee to the Bank not exceed 0.30% per anrnmn of the
stated amount of such letter of Credit;
(d) the final Installment Payment of the District under the
Acgnisition Agreement shall be due and payable not later
than August 1, 2015; and
(e) the Underwriter's discount (excluding-any original issue
discount) under the Purchase Contract shall not exceed .595%
of the aggregate principal amount of the Certificates.
Section 4: The Preliminary Official Statement presented to
this Board of Directors is hereby approved, and the distribution of said
Preliminary Official Statement (with such additions and changes as are
consistent with this Resolution and the limits prescribed herein and
approved by the Manager) to prospective purchasers of the Certificates is
hereby approved.
-3-
WHEREAS, in order to secure the payment of principal and interest
with respect to the Certificates, it has been proposed that the Districts
obtain a Letter of Credit to be issued by National Westminster Hank PLC,
San Francisco Overseas Branch (the "Bank") p„ranant to the terns and
conditions set forth in the Reinburaament Agreement, dated as of November
1, 1990, among the Districts and the Bank (the "Ret mhnraement Agreement"),
the proposed form of which has been presented to this Hoard of Directors;
and
WHEREAS, it has been proposed that Merrill Lynch & Co. (the
"Underwriter") purchase the Certificates pursuant to a Certificate Purchase
Agreement among the Underwriter and the Districts (the 'Purchase
Contract"), the proposed form of which has been presented to this Board of
Directors; and
WHEREAS, to facilitate the retarketing of the Certificates, it
has been proposed that the Districts enter into a Remarketing Agreement,
dated as of November 1, 1990 by and among the Districts and Merrill Lynch &
Co. as Remarketing Agent (the "Remarketing Agreeent") the proposed form of
which has been presented to this Board of Directors; and
WHEREAS, there has been presented to this Board of Directors a
Preliminary Official Statement relating to the Certificates (the
"Preliminary official Statement"); and
WHEREAS, it is proposed that the terms of the financing
contemplated by the foregoing shall be subject to the limitations set forth
herein; and
WHEREAS, this District has dete=dned that it is in the best
interest of this District and the residents within the District to approve
the Preliminary Official Statement and authorize and approve the
transactions contemplated thereby; and
NOW, THEREFORE, the Heard of Directors of the District does
hereby resolve as follows:
Section 1: That the Trust Agreement, the Acquisition Agreement,
the Assignment Agreement, the Purchase Contract, the Remarketing Agreement,
and the Reimbursement Agreement, in the forms presented to his Board of
Directors, are hereby approved. The Chairman or chairman pro tempro and
the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary are authorized and directed for and
in the name of the District to execute and deliver said agreements. The
agreements shall be executed in the forms hereby approved, with such
additions thereto and changes therein as are (i) approved in accordance
with Section 3 hereof, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the
execution and delivery thereof or (a) recommended or approved by Special
Counsel to the Districts and approved by such officers, such approval to be
conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery thereof.
-2-
Section 5: ' The Chairman or Chairman pro tempore is authorized
and directed to execute and deliver a final Official Statement in
accordance with the Purchase Contract in substantially the form of the
Preliminary official Statement, and such additions thereto and changes
therein as are consistent with this Resolution and the limits prescribed
herein and recommnded or approved by Special Counsel to the Districts and
approved by such officers and employees, such approval to be conclusively
evidenced by the execution and delivery thereof.
Section 6: That this Board of Directors hereby appoints Texas
Commerce Bank National Association as the Trustee under the Trust
Agreement.
Section 7: That this Board of Directors hereby appoints
National Westminster Bank PLC, San Francisco Overseas Branch as the Letter
of Credit bank.
Section 8• The Chairman, Chairman pro tempore, Secretary and
any other officer, official or member of the staff of the District is each
authorized and directed, jointly and severally, to do any and all things
and to execute and deliver any and all documents which they may deer
necessary and advisable in order to effectuate the purposes of this
Resolution, and such actions previously taken by.such officers are hereby
ratified and confined.
Section 9: This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon
its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 14, 1990.
-4- —
F_ : AGENDA ITEM NO. 17 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
October 30 1990 1OBAX Ews AVENUE
A BOX 8127
fIXMIAINVAUlY.CAUMANIA 82J2"12)
0192624411
REPORT OF
BUILDING COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: October 30, 1990 -- 5:30 p.m.
COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF MEMBERS:
Present: Present:
Norman E. Culver, Chairman Tom Dawes, Director of
Roland Bigonger Engineering
Don R. Griffin Dr. Louis Sangermano,
William D. Mahoney Laboratory Manager
James Neal
Charles Sylvia
Jim Wahner
Absent: Others Present:
Wes Bannister Thomas L. Woodruff, General
Carrey Nelson Counsel
J. R. "Bob" Siefen
Grace Winchell
1. PROPOSED CENTRAL LABORATORY MODIFICATIONS AND UPGRADES,
JOB NO. J-17
The Directors were briefed on a proposed major change to
the interior of the new laboratory by Dr. Lou Sangermano,
the Districts' new Laboratory Manager, who reviewed the
enclosed Staff Report on Proposed Central Laboratory
Modifications and Upgrades (green) outlining
recommendations to change the building interior based on
his review of the Districts' future needs. These needs
havechanged substantially from that identified in the
original preliminary work and subsequent design of the
laboratory now under construction. Staff has recommended
that the laboratory interior be redesigned to provide for
repositioning of casework, new casework and provide for
additional laboratory equipment and facilities.
v
The changes were carefully reviewed by the Committee and
approved, subject to refinement of costs and subsequent
approval of certain interior changes.
Staff has estimated the cost of the changes at $750,000
with project completion delayed about four months.
Following extensive deliberations, the Building Committee
recommended that the Boards of Directors approve the
following actions:
A. Authorize Addendum No. 3 to the Professional
Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering
Corporation providing for the additional design
services for the interior laboratory to accommodate
the new configuration, in an amount not to exceed
$150,000. The addendum will increase the current
agreement with Boyle from an authorized amount of
$491,703 to $641,703.
B. Authorize staff to negotiate change orders providing
for new casework, deletion of existing casework and
necessary modifications to HVAC, power and other
utilities. The change orders will be subject to
future Building Committee review and approval by the
Boards.
The Committee also authorized staff to issue notices to
the contractor to stop work in the interior until such
time as revised plans are prepared.
2. PROPOSED INTERIM MODIFICATIONS TO THE EXISTING LABORATORY
AND PURCHASE OF .LABORATORY TRAILERS (SPECIFICATION
NO. E-194)
In response to current needs of the new Laboratory, the
Committee reviewed a proposal to modify the existing
laboratories and to purchase two trailers and outfit them
with laboratory equipment at an estimated cost of
approximately $118,735. (See enclosed Staff Report on
Proposed Interim Modifications to the Existing Laboratory
and Purchase of Laboratory Trailers [yellow] . ) The
trailers would be outfitted with benches which would be
reused in the new Central Laboratory. The trailers
themselves would be reused by the Engineering Department
for Construction Management personnel once the new
laboratory is completed.
After considerable discussion, the Building Committee
recommends that staff be authorized to proceed with
interim existing laboratory facilities modifications and
the acquisition of trailers, benches, and installation of
same, at an estimated cost of $118,735.
-2-
3. ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB
NO. J-7-4
Staff updated the Building Committee on the progress of
the administration building addition. In general, work
is proceeding according to the schedule and estimated
costs outlined at the July 26, 1990 Building Committee
meeting.
4 . WAREHOUSE AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING, AND OIL STORAGE AND
DISPENSING IMPROVEMENTS. JOB NO. J-20
At the previous Building Committee meeting, staff briefed
the Committee members on the status of the warehouse
project, including problems experienced by poor design
plans and contractor difficulties. The project is
complete and staff recommended that the Committee review
the enclosed proposed Change Orders Nos. 7, 8 and 9
(salmon) negotiated with the contractor to close out the
job.
The Committee reviewed the final closeout change orders,
including an analysis prepared by staff of the reasons
for the change orders, and made the following
recommendations regarding the contract with J. R. Roberts
Corporation:
.r A. Approve Change Order No. 7 adding $204,087.67 and
145 calendar days to the project for 37 items of
additional or deleted work.
B. Approve Change Order No. 8 assessing a penalty in
the amount of $57,500.00 against the contractor.
C. Approve Change. Order No. 9 adjusting the engineer's
final quantities in the amount of $32,463.50.
D. Approve the Closeout Agreement and authorize filing
of a Notice of Completion.
5. AUTHORIZING FILING OF CLAIM FOR PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE
AGAINST ARCHITECT RE JOBS J-7-4 AND J-20
The General Counsel reviewed his enclosed memorandum
(buff) recommending that the Districts file a notice of
claim against Pulaski and Arita, Inc. , architects for
Administration Building Addition at Plant 1, Job No.
J-7-4, and Warehouse and Maintenance Building and Oil
Storage -and Dispensing Improvements, Job No: J-20, for
professional negligence pertaining to the design of said
jobs.
v
-3-
Following a discussion the Committee recommends that
General Counsel be authorized to file such a claim �.
against the architect and to take any other appropriate
actions in pursuit of the Districts, claim including
engagement of architectural/engineering experts for an
independent opinion and the filing of legal proceedings.
6. CONTROL CENTER/OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING, JOB
NO. J-23-1
Staff advised the Committee members that the plans and
specifications for the new Control Center/Operations and
Maintenance Building, Job No. J-23-1, are now complete
and will be presented to the full Boards for approval at
the November 14, 1990 regular meeting. The estimated
cost of the 25,000 square foot building is $3,200,000.
Bids are expected to be received in January 1991.
TMD:jt
-4-
October 23, 1990
STAFF REPORT
PROPOSED CENTRAL LABORATORY MODIFICATIONS AND UPGRADES
(JOB No. J-17)
Since the original design of the Central Laboratory, the Laboratory Division
has undergone dramatic changes in scope and direction. These changes are
being driven by a variety of different requirements. The laboratory needs to
modernize its capabilities to handle an ever-increasing workload in its
traditional type of support analyses (i.e. , industrial source control,
wastewater, process control, etc.) , and provide new areas of research and
technical support in air analysis, virology, and enhanced ocean monitoring
programs. The laboratory must utilize new state-of-the-art analytical
instrumentation techniques to provide high quality, quantitative analyses at
ultra-low (parts-per-billion and parts-per-trillion) concentration levels.
(To put this in perspective, one part per trillion would be roughly equivalent
to a pinhead in a two-lane transcontinental highway between Los Angeles and
New York.
The laboratory is rapidly moving forward to develop cutting-edge technologies
to critically examine aspects of the Districts' process interaction effects
with the environment that will make the Districts' laboratory one of the
leading environmental labs in the nation. These changes require the
development and utilization of modern instrumental methods of analysis,
enhancing the technical level of expertise in the organization, and facilities
which are specifically designed to support these efforts.
As part of our move to upgrading and modernize the function and capabilities
of our laboratory, after a lengthy search we have successfully recruited a new
Laboratory Manager, Dr. Louis Sangermano. He comes to us with over 15 years
of high-level laboratory management experience, primarily in aerospace with
its demands of high quality and rapidly changing technology. He has built
over a dozen analytical laboratories (some in the hundreds-of-millions-of-
dollar range) and developed the technical, scientific and management staffs to
run them. One of his first tasks as our Laboratory Manager has been to
evaluate the operation of our existing laboratory and to review the drawings
of the Central Laboratory with a particular focus on our needs for the next 10
to 20 years.
\ai .
His examination of the J-17 building drawings indicates that the current
design does need some upgrading and modification to most effectively address
our new and changed requirements.
Examples of the proposed upgrades to the current design include:
• Providing dedicated, clean, uninterrupted power sources to key
computer driven instrumentation
• The installation of biosafety cabinets as opposed to fume hoods in the
microbiology/virology laboratories
• The installation of dishwashers (for laboratory glassware) , drains,
sinks and dsionized water at critical locations
• Emergency notification alarm systems in each laboratory room.
• Additional ultra-pure water systems to provide high-quality water for
ultra-low concentration organic and inorganic analyses
• Adding computer terminals and telephones for the laboratory
information systems' rapid transfer of data
• More drawer apace to meet storage needs throughout the
laboratories
Examples of the proposed modifications needed to the current design include:
• Provide more.open layout of the work areas that would enhance
efficiency and safety
• Move fume hoods away from high-cost instrumentation where high
concentrations of acids and solvents are used and which would,
otherwise, impact analytical accuracy
• Delete some bench rows of cabinets where large, "showcase" ,
stand-alone instrumentation will be located
• Eliminate long tubing runs to supply ultra-pure gases to
instrumentation where the smallest leak will induce errors in the
analyses
• Provide more wall space to accommodate hanging cabinets for adequate
storage capabilities in Microbiology
• Eliminate unnecessary, two-foot-wide work spaces behind adjacent
2
r= -
cabinet rows and provide more aisle space and benchtop working areas
a Separate highly sensitive analytical instrumentation from areas where
they may "pick up" high background contamination levels
a Modify the microbiology/virology laboratory, which is currently
designed as an instrumentation laboratory, to meet the newly emerging
needs of Microbiology/Virology work activities
By addressing these requirements now, the laboratory will avoid more costly
retrofits later, will avoid the large-scale work interruptions that will
result from such retrofits and, most importantly, provide us with a state-of-
the-art laboratory needed to meet regulatory and analytical demands well into
the 21st century.
�' 3
�.d October 23, 1990
STAFF REPORT
PROPOSED INTERIM MODIFICATIONS
TO THE EXISTING LABORATORY
AND
PURCHASE OF LABORATORY TRAILERS
The existing laboratory at Plant No. 1 is approximately 20 years old. Since
it was built, its work load has dramatically increased. It is currently being
used by twice the number of personnel for which it was originally designed.
As an example, in the last nine years the number of industrial waste samples
analyzed by the laboratory has nearly quadrupled from 6,000 per year to 21,000
per year. This has resulted in extremely overcrowded and unsafe working
conditions which can also affect the integrity of the sampling and analytical
activities.
The laboratory also has a potential contamination problem from dust in the
environment. The HVAC system and instrument-venting systems have deteriorated
to the point that rust and corrosion from the duct work are a potential source
of air contamination. While this contamination does not constitute a health
v hazard for our employees, it can cause sample contamination problems. The
laboratory performs analyses of trace constituents for regulatory compliance
and source control permit enforcement. We typically sample for pares-per-
billion concentrations, therefore, need to ensure that we have an
uncontaminated laboratory environment.
Because of space constraints, the laboratory has no room to house modern,
high-efficiency analytical equipment which it is currently purchasing, and can
not provide sufficient work space for the additional high-level technical
staff that we are now hiring.
To correct this situation, staff is proposing the following interim
modifications:
1. Relocate the heavy metal analytical instrumentation to the newer
laboratory at Plant No. 2 where the laboratory air is clean and there is
adequate floor space. The bench space liberated by this move at Plant
No. 1 would allow for the expansion of the Toxic Organics Analysis
section.
2. Relocate the Microbiology laboratory to a new trailer to be located
behind the existing Plant No. 1 laboratory. This would provide an
increase of work space from the existing 330 square feet to 800 square
*./ 1
feet. The amount of storage space for this laboratory would also
double. This move would allow us to begin virology work and additional
bacterial sampling to confirm that we are adequately protecting the
beach-going public. Also, our offshore bacteriological monitoring,
currently under contract to SAIC, could be performed in-house. This
would provide considerable cost savings and produce a high level of
quality control.
3. By moving the Microbiology laboratory to a new trailer, provide
additional working space for the Wet Chemistry section at Plant No. 1.
This additional space is required to relieve the overcrowding that has
resulted in employees having to work off carts and the edges of bench
tops.
4. Purchase second trailer to provide the required office space for key
personnel that are now being hired.
These modifications would allow for the continued growth and upgrade of the
laboratory division staff while waiting for completion of the new Central
laboratory facility which is some 12 to 18 months away.
The proposed interim modifications to the existing laboratory will cost an
estimated $118,735. A breakdown of the costs are as follows:
A. Two trailers (bacteriology and office) $ 38,500
B. Modifications to existing laboratories 23,000
C. New benches, sinks and hoods to be
installed in bacteriology trailer 57,235
Total 5118.735
Fortunately, many of the interim modifications that staff is suggesting would
be transferred into the Central laboratory or to other Districts, usage,
thereby representing an offsetting cost savings. Upon the completion of the
Central laboratory, the two trailers would be transferred to the Engineering
Department for use in construction management. The facility modifications at
Plant No. 2 would remain after completion of the work, and the benches, sinks
and hoods would be moved to the new Central laboratory. Therefore, with the
exception of approximately $20,000, all of the cost for the interim
modifications would be offset by other future uses.
BPA/ahh
REF #010141.RP
2 \oo,
C OLD= SANITATION DISTRICTS OF C RANGE CC II= Page 1 of 15
P. O. BOX M7 - 10844 EL,T,TR AVENGE
FOCIIMIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
_ CHANCE ORDER
C. 0. No. Seven (7)
CCUrRA 1Of¢: J. R. Rcberts Corporation DATE November 14, 1990
JOB: WJUUK= AND WJN1'ELIANCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING
II11ROVEMENTS, JOB NO. J-20
Am t of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct_) $ 204,087.60
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as ccapensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 - ELEVATOR VENTIIA OR AND SHEET METAL ADDITION
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install 18 gauge sheet metal plugs for
existing Shop B wall openings where they abut Building 3 and a roof ventilator
for the elevator equip nt room in Building 6. These additions were not shown on
the Contract Drawings nor included in the Contract Specifications. This item of
work was acco pLished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section
10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: FM 31)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 780.00
TI1+E EXTENSION TfIIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days
Item 2 - LIGHTING FIXTURE CHANCES IN BUILDINGS 5 AND 6
The Contractor was directed to perform the following electrical changes and
modifications:
A. Due to the change from a suspended ceiling to drywall ceiling, delete the
Contract specified Type D lighting fixtures in Building 6 men's and wmen's
bathroom lavatories and outer foyer and add surface mount Type G.
B. Install two receptacles for drinking fountains on the second floor of
Building 6.
C. Install a circuit for Ventilation Fan EF-2 in Building 6.
D. Change specified Type G to Type R recessed light fixture in Stair E in
Building 5 due to space Limitations. The above work was not shown on the
Contract Drawings or Contract Specifications.
These items of work were accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to
Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO S20)
ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,640.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 4 Calendar Days
COUNTY SANITsTTCN DIE7II2ICTS OF CHANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 15
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 MIT AVENUE
FUMnM N VALIEY, C;U=CRNIA 92708
. CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Seven (7)
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE Novenber 14, 1990
JOB: F7AREH(X1SE AND NiAINrE NCE BUILDING AND OII. STORE ACID DISPENSING
IN1PfX7VEMEN15. JOB NO. J-20
Item 3 - KITCHEN] APFLLA CE CIRCUITRY FOR BLUMDING 6
The Contractor was directed to provide circuitry, conduit and wiring in the
kitchen of Building 6 for installation of a refrigerator, oven, cocktop, range
hood fan and garbage disposal. These electrical additions were not shown on the
Contract Drawings nor includei in the Contract Specifications. This item of work
was accrngl3shed by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of
the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 423)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,513.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITZ•'l9: 4 Calendar Days
Item 4 - ND:S('Rr.rANEC tc ELE=CAL CIRCUITRY FOR BUILDING 6
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install conduits and wiring to provide
circuits for an air dryer, hot water circulation pimp and hot water heater
electric gas igniter. Also included in this item is the furnishing and
installation of two additional thermostat control boxes and conduit in Roam 102A
and 103A of Bunning 5. The above work was not shown on the Contract Drawings nor
included in the Contract Specifications. These items of work were acccuplished by
Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General
Provisions. (Reference: PCH 27)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,626.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 5 Calendar Days
Item 5 - FIRE ALARM SYSTEM AND TELEPHONE COND= ADDITION FOR BUILDING 6
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install a fire sprinkler alarm for
Buildings 5 and 6. This work involved installing additional conduit and wiring
from the fire sprinkler floe switch and ta„par switches on the east side of
Building 6 to the new fire alarm control panel located in the Administration
Building. Also included in this item is the furnishing and installation of two
additional 2-inch telephone conduits from Building 4 to Building 6; installation
of two additional telephone outlets in Rooms 101 and 201 of Building 6; addition
of a card reader on the exterior of door No. 1 in Building 6; addition of two low
profile light fixtures in Stairways B and C. These electrical additions were not
shown on the Contract Drawings nor included in the Contract Specifications. This
item of work was acccopLished.by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section
10-6(b) (2)B of the General Pmisions. (Reference: PCH 21 and PCH 24)
ADDED '(1ST THIS CHANGE CRDER =: $ 12,626.00
TIME EXTENSION TRIS CHANGE ORDER ITE74: 7 Calendar Days
COMM enurMIGN D7SMCTS OF CHANGE COUNIR Page 3 of 15
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 HIT AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CAL'UTIOUM 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Seven (7)
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE November 14. 1990
JOB: VMREHOCSE AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING AND OM STORAGE AND DISPENSING
1144 VEME[T1S, JOB NO. J-20
Item 6 - Ia: VaL OF UNSUl'MM SOIL UNDER BUILDING 6 ELEVATOR PIT
The r.,.rtractor was directed to rove and dispose a of an additional 4 feet of
unsuitable oversaturated clay soil material from under the elevator pit in
w"tdin 6, and pads of Buildings 5 and 6. The removal res directed by the
Districts' Soil Consultant in order to provide a stable pad for construction of
the building elevator pit because the elevation is 4 feet below floor level.
Contract plans and specifications did not include the above additional cork. This
item of cork was aocmglished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section
10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisicns. (Reference: FCO 9)
�. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE CRDER ITEM $ 4,942.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 5 Calendar Days
Item 7 - BUILDING 8 FOUIIDAT'ION REINFORCING STEEL ADDITION
The Contractor was directed to add reinforcing steel daels at 18 inches on center
along the rear foundation of Building 8 to tie the building concrete floor slab to
the footing along Plan Reference Lines C and S. This was donne at the direction of
the project structural engineer in order to provide foundation stability and as an
alternative to avere:=avation and reccepacti-cn of existing soils six feet beyond
the rear foundation into Fuentes Drive. Overexcavation and rec^i+action was
required in the project geotech nical report but was never included in the Contract
Plans or Specifications. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force
account pursuant to-Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference:
PCB 3)
ADDED COST THIS CHARGE ORDER ITEM: $ 919.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANCE ORM ITEM: 2 Calendar Days
OM M SANITATION 11Q3Ricrs OP ORANGE C0(WZ Page 4 of 15
P. o. BOX 8127 - 10844 PTT AVENUE
FOnnAIN VALTEY, CALIPORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER --�
C. O. NO. Seven (7)
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE November 44. 1990
JOB: WAREHIXSE ACID dAIMENANCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE ACID DISPENSING
II4F . JOB NO. J-20
Item 8 - ELEVATOR SHAFT AND EQUIF' MV ROOM CHANGES
The Contractor was directed to construct a separate wall between the elevator
shaft and equipment room in Building 6. The exposed roof drain inside the
elevator equipment room in Building 6 was also required to be walled in. The wall
consisted of 2 x 6 studs 10 feet wide by 25 feet high, covered with drywall and
painted. Drywall was also added to the ceilings in both areas. Included in this
item were several electrical additions consisting of a light fixture, receptacle
and switch mounted in the elevator emergency pit and emergency telephone for the
elevator car. The above additional work was not included in the Contract and is
reeq=ed by the California Division of IzAiutrial Safety Elevator Section. This
item of work was aa:oplished on a time-and-materials basis pursuant to Section
10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER r1EM: $ 13,146.00
TIM EXTENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 10 Calendar Days
Item 9 - BUILDING 6.BATHROOM DOOR ADDIT.ICN
The Contractor was directed to add two privacy doors to separate the men's and
we men's bathroom lavatory area from the main entrance foyer in Building 6. The
work consisted of furnishing and installing two 3-foot x 6-foot 8-inch doors,
frames and panic hardware, exit signs and painting, which was not included in the
Contract. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account
pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCB 26)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER PPEM: $ 3,252.00
ME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 3 Calendar Days
Item 10 - FRAMING ADDITICNS TO BUIIAINGS 5 & 6
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install additional woad framing in a
mmmber of different locations inside Buildings 5 and 6. The additional work
consisted of ceiling framing inside gilding 6 am's and women's bathroom area,
framing the underside of Stairway Landings B and C in da,il.ding 6, adding skylight
shaft framing for eight skylights inside Buildings 5 and 6, framing a folding door
pit inside Building 6, Room 207, miscellaneous furring and framing to conceal
piping, and ductwork and structural steel in Buildings 5 and 6. The above
additions were not shown on the Contract Drawings nor included in the Contract
specifications. These items of work were accoplished by Contractor's force
account pursuant to to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. r►
(Reference: EM 32)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 18,312.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 31 Calendar Days
COUNTY SANITATION DISNICIS OF ORANGE COUNW Page 5 of 15
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 RET,T.n. AVENUE
EOipMUN VALLEY, alllFCRNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. Seven (7)
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE Novenher 14. 1990
JOB: WAREHOUSE AND MA=NANCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING
II3PROVEMENTS, JOB NO. J-20
Item 11 - LAVATORY DRYWALL CEILING - BUILDING 6
The Contractor was directed to delete the contract-specified reflected ceiling and
furnish, install and finish a drywall ceiling in the men's and wonen's lavatory area
of Building 6. This change was made because the moist ennvirocmient of the
lavatories is inconpatible with a reflected ceiling installation. A credit of
$500.00 was received fran the Contractor for deletion of the reflected ceiling.
This item of work was accrnplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to
Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: POO 34)
ADDED COST THIS ORANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 307.00
TIME EXTENSION IBIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: - 2 Calendar Days
ILItem 12 - DRYWALL DOOR POCKET - BUII:AING 6 - ROOM 207
The Contractor was directed to furnish, install and finish drywall enclosing an
additional folding door pocket -in Roan 207 of Building 6. The additional door
pocket had to be added when it was discovered that the total length of the folding
door in the open position was twice as long as shown on the Contract Drawings.
This item of work was accoaplished on a time-and-material basis pursuant to
Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: ECO #34)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 700.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days
Item 13 - DRYWALL UNDER STAIRWAYS C ABED D - BUILDING 6
The Contractor was directed to furnish, install and finish firestop drywall on the
underside of floor joists supporting Stairways C and D in Building 6. This was
required by the Uniform Building Code to meet fire resistive requirarents where
the envelope of the lower st�ll did not cover the second floor stairwell.
This additional drywall was not shown on the Contract Drawings nor included in the
Contract Specifications. This item of work was aoacuplished by Contractor's force
account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. . (Reference
ECO 34)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,020.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 5 Calendar Days
OMMTY SMW=CN DISTRICTS OF CHANCE OMMY Page 6 of 15
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 FTT•TC AVENGE
FaWrftm VALLEY, CALUMRM 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Seven (7)
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE Nove:rber 44. 1990
JOB: WAREBOCISE AND MAINTENANCE BUILMG AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING
114T VVE[ENTS, JOB NO. J-20
Item 14 - BUILDING 4 WAIL HEIGHT INCREASE
The Contractor was directed to increase the height of all Building 4 tilt-up
concrete wa11 panels by two feet 5� inches. This was done in order to increase
the height of Building 4 to match the parapet of the abutting existing warehouse
building. Different parapet elevations were shown on the Contract Drawings for
each bmld ng which prevented the building F matching architecturally. Work
included in this item consisted of carpentry and form lumber required in
lengthening wall panel casting beds and the costs of additional concrete. This
item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force amount pursuant to Section
10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED CISr THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,560.00
TIME EXTE SICK THIS CHANGE CFMER ITEM: 14 Calendar Days
Item 15 - AUTO SHOP SPRUMER READ REFIACEMENr
The Contractor was directed to replace 78 fire sprinkler heads previously
installed in the .er� Vehicle Maintenance Building. The heads had
inadvertently been painted by the Districts maintenance staff during repainting of
the building ceiling, reducing the ability of the heads to function properly. The
City of F=ta;n Valley Fire Department i nerrrrt..r required that they be replaced.
This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's farce account pursuant to
Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 36)
ADDED CST THIS CRANE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,293.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER TM: 2 Calendar Days
Item 16 - BUIMINCS 4 AND 7 FENCING ADDITICN
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install 50 linear feet of 8-foot high
fencing at &al i„g 4 aid 15 linear feet of 6-foot high fencing with 3-foat wide
gate at Building 7. The additional fencing was requested by the Districts to
provide better security around the buildings and was not shown on the Contract
Drawings. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force amount
pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 15)
ADDED C%YiT THIS CHANGE ORDER rTEM: $ 2,820.00
TIME E=1SICN THIS CHANCE CROER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
COMM emrmaTTON DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COMM Page 7 of 15
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 Erl AVENUE
FU NTAIN VALM, CAInUUM 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. seven (7)
CSBTTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE November 14. 1990
JOB: WAREHOUSE AND EAITT== BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING
IMPROVEMENTS, JOB NO. J-20
Item 17 - PERSMNEL ANNEX EMM cpurnmIM DELETION
The Contractor was not required to furnish and install a new fire sprinkler system
in the existing temporary trailers housing the Personnel Annex as shown on the
Contract Drawings. As these buildings am of a temporary nature, the City of
Fountain Valley Fire Department waived the requirement for installation of a fire
sprinkler systm. This it® of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant
to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference PCH 15)
(T�DIT THIS CHANGE; ORDER ITEM: $ (2,310.00)
TIME EXTENSION T8L5 CHANGE ORDER IIEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 18 - BUILDING 7 FIREST0P DRYWALL
The Contractor was directed to furnish, install and finish two layers of 5/8-inch
firestcp drywall on the underside of the roof of Building 7 and 25 feet into
adjacent buildings. This was a requirement of the City of Fountain Valley
Building Department not included in the Contract. The justification for this
additional work was fireproofing the wood ceiling and roof structure in and around
the oil storage area. This item of work was ammpLished by Contractor's force
amount pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions.
(Reference: PCH 15)
ADDED CYST TffiS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 23,487.00
TZME EXTENSION T19T CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 14 Calendar Days
Item 19 - BUILDING 4 REINFORCING STEEI ADDITION
The Contract= was directed to add additional vertical and horizontal reinforcing
steel due to the increase in height of the tilt-up concrete wall panels in
Building 4 by 2 feet 5' inches. This was done in order to increase the height of
wilding 4 to match the parapet of the abutting existing Warehouse Building.
Different parapet elevations were shown on the Contract Drawings for each building
which prevented the building from matching architecturally. Work included in this
item consisted of furnishing, cutting and placement of the additional reinforcing
steel. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force amount pursuant
to section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 12)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,625.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days
COUNTY SA4¢TA CN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 8 of 15
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 EITDE AVENUE
EOlWaN VALLEY, CAL'1 IM IA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Seven (7)
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE November 14, 1990
JOB: NAREHWSE AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING
IMPROVEMENTS, JOB No. J-20
Item 20 - DELETION OF BUILDING 7 ROLLING SERVICE DOORS
The Contractor was directed to delete three rolling service doors enclosed in the
front of Building 7 which were included in the Contract. The doors were deleted
when the Districts decided to modify the design of the building, leaving the front
open. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section
10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 15)
CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (9,000.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CFI ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 21 - STRUCTURAL STEEL MODIFICATIONS
The Contractor was directed to make a number of nnditirations to the structural
steel nEnbers in Buildings 1, 2, 6, and 7. These changes included shortening the
steel columns in Buildings 1 and 2 in order to match the parapet height of
fisting Building 77 modifying the s aiTwny supports in Building 6 due to
revisions by the project architect and deleting four steel columns supporting
Building 7 exterior doors which were deleted. Included in this item are
additional costs =erred by the steel fabricator in revising the structural steel
shop drawings. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to
Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 8, PCH 10 and
PCH 15)
ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,088.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 5 Calendar Days
Item 22 - PLUMBING DRAIN ADDITION FOR BUILDINGS 1, 2, AND 7
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install a roof drainage system for -
Buildings 1 and 2 and a waste oil sump drainage system for the oil dock in
Building 7. Also included are rerouting of existing roof drains in Building 7 and
lowering of two site catch basin drain covers due to changes in paving grades.
This item includes a credit of $1,140.00 for deletion of one shower and one urinal
in the men's bathroom in Building 6. The above work was not shown on the Contract
Drawings nor included in the Contract Specifications. This item of work was
accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the
General Provisions.- (Reference: PCH 15)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 20,165.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 7 Calendar Days
CaPIrL SANITATION DISTRICTS OF CHANGE COUNTY Page 9 of 1.5
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 EI,T,TF AVENUE
FU NPAIN VALLEY, CAI IFORNIn 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. Seven (71
COTI'RACICR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE November 14, 1990
JOB: WAREHOUSE ACID MAINTENANCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING
INnYROVE2,1ENIS, JOB NO. J-20
Item 23 - PAINTING OF ROOF DRAIN PIPING IN BUILDINGS 1 ACID 2
The Contractor was directed to paint roof drain piping installed in Buildings 1
and 2. Painting of the added roof drains (Item 22) was not included in the
Contract. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account
pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: FOR 15)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 960.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 24 - HARDWARE REVISIONS EM BUILDING 6
The Contractor was directed to make the following hardware revisions to
Building 6:
A. (flange the exit devices to fire-rated type.
B. Add closers at Docrs 31 and 32 to comply with label requirements.
C. Change hinges to ball bearing type.
D. Add closer and Broke seal to Door 48 to ccuply with label requirements.
The above changes were requested by the Districts and not included in the
Contract. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to
Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 15)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,257.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 25 - BUILDINGS 7 LIGHTING UPGRADE
The Contractor was directed to remove and replace the existing light fixtures in
Building 7 in order to install the new fire resistant drywall ceiling. It was
also necessary to upgrade the fixtures, conduit and connectors to meet code for an
explosion-proof installation, as required by the City of Fountain Valley Building
Depa,tmant, This additional work was not covered in the Contract and was
accomplished by Contractor's force arccount pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the
General Provisions.
ADDED COST TBIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 11,216.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 10 Calendar Days
COUNTY SANIMIION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COOCIIY Page 10 of 15
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 Ff,T,TC AVENUE
FU2nAIN VALLEY, CUZFM41A 92708
CHARGE ORDER
C. O. NO. Seven (7)
CCNTRPCIOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE November 14, 1990
JOB: FiPJrf'I3COSE ARID RiAIITTENANCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE ARID DISPENSING
RJP%JVEME , JOB NO. J-20
Item 26 - HOOF TILE ARID CARPET ADDITION FOR B=I% 6
The Contractor was directed to add vinyl flooring in the men's shv room
entrance hallway and carpet in the hallway adjacent to the library. The finish
schedule on the Contract Drawings did not designate numbers or finishes for these
hallway areas in Building 6. This item of work was accruplished by Contractor's
force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions.
(Reference PCH 15)
ADDED CST THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: $ 982.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 27 - FITCHEN CABINET ADDITIONS FOR BUILDING 6
The Contractor was directed to increase the depth of the cabinets and add a soffit
in the kitchen in Building 6. The depth of the cabinets were increased from 24
inches to 26k inches in order to provide enough clearance for the sink and range
top. A 6-inch high soffit was required to fill in the area between the top of the
cabinets and the kitchen ceiling. The Contract Drawings specified 24-inch deep
cabinets with no provisions for a soffit. This item of work was accomplished by
Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General
Provisions. (Reference: PCH 15)
ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,743.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Day
Item 28 - REDESIGN OF SUSPENDED CEIIZNGi IN BUILDING 5
The Contractor was directed to change the light fixture layout in Roam 103 of
Building 5 in ordp to avoid interference between the light fixtures and the fire
sprinkler piping. The suspended ceiling framing had to be reworked in order to
reposition the light fixtures. The Contract Drawings did not show the
interference. This item of work was acca p] ished by Contractor's force account
pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 15)
ADDED COST THIS CH= ORDER ITEM: $ 101.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER =1: 0 Calendaz Days
C xwr SA1UMMCH DISTRICTS OF MNGH COUNTY Page 11 of 15
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELT AVENUE
FCUTAIIi VAISSY, CNHISaMM 92708
CHANGE CRDER
C. O. NO. Seven (7)
CONIRP=: J. R. Roberts Corporation DAM November 44. 1990
JCB: [FUSE AND MAIINIEN= BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING
Ug4UA N MS, JOB NO. J-20
Item 29 - EXTENCED OVERHEAD
The Contractor has submitted a claim to the Districts for its costs of extended
overhead due to delays in contract construction progress caused by errors and
omissions in the contract documents. Contractor has claimed costs of $534.48 per
day for 196 days for a total of $104,758.08. Districts' staff has negotiated for
an agreed amount of $534.48 per day for 145 days for a total of $77,499.60.
Included in the daily overhead costs aze salaries for Contractor supervisory
personnel and secretary, vehicle expenses, office trailer and equipment rental,
Office supplies, telephone, chemical toilet rental , disposal hins and in.uranro.
This its of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section
10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST TffiS CHANGE ORDER MEN: $ 77,499.60
TIME EXTENSION T1315 CHANGE CRDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 30 - ELEVATOR GUIDE RAIL SUPPORT BFFL[a:15
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install eight elevator guide rail
sport brackets for Building 6 in order to attach the two elevator guide rails
to the concrete tilt-up walls inside the elevator shaft. Details on the brackets
were not shown on the Contract structural drawings and it was necessary for the
project structural engineer to prepare additional drawings in order for the
Contractor to have the steel brackets fabricated. This item of work was
accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the
General Provisions. (Reference: IG8 14)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE CRDER MEM: $ 4,505.00
TIME EXTENSIM THIS CHANGE CHEER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days
Item 31 - GAS SUPPLY AND DRAIN C@II+M TICN ECR BUILDING 4
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install a 3/4-inch gas supply and
1-inch condensation drain line to serve the air conditioning system installed on
the roof of Building 4. This work consisted of connecting the 3/4-inch gas line
to the Districts existing 3-inch lee pressure gas line adjacent to the building
and extending the 1-inch condensate drain line into a new 12-inch x 12-inch
concrete drain box installed on the south side of the building. The gas line
connection and drain box were not shaman on the Contract Drawings or included in
the Contract Specifications. This item of work was accouplished by Contractor's
force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions.
(Reference: FM 36)
AD® COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,654.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE CRLIER PIR•:bd: 0 Calendar Days
COMP SANITATICH DISIItICLS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 12 of 15 -
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 RE-1 AVENUE
EUUNTAIN VALTZY, CALIECRY 1 92708
CHANCE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Seven (7)
OONMACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE Noveirber 14. 1990
JOB: WAREHOUSE AND NAINIENANCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING
n4YRUVEMENTS, JOB NO. J-20
Item 32 - AIR I TO BUILDING 5
The Contractor was directed to install an additional 2-inch cmm*P=sad air line
from shop Buildinj. B to Building 5. This change consisted of excavating,
furnishing and installing black iron pipe and fittings, wrapping, bac1 ,cF'l 1 i ng and
pressure tasting. The new air line was requested by the Districts and was not
included in the contract. This item of work was acxaupli.shed by Contractor's
force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(B) of the General Provisions.
(Reference: EOO 33)
AD® 0.'1ST THIS CHANCE ORDER Pffi4: $ 1,689.00
TIME EXTENSION TffiS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days
Item 33 - ADDITIONAL PAVING AT BUILDING 4
The Contractor was directed to add an additional 4,228 square feet of asphalt
paving and aggregate base adjacent to Building 4. This was required in order to
replace badly deteriorated existing asphalt paving around the new building. The
Contract Drawings did not show these additional areas as receiving new asphalt
paving. A credit was **roi•ed for 2,569 square feet of new, paving deleted
adjacent to Buildings 2 and 6. The costs of an additional move-in for the paving
crew to pave around Building 8 are also included in this item. This item of Murk
was accomplished by.Ccntractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of
the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: $ 8,043.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 3 Calendar Days
Item 34 - BUILDINGS 5 AND 6 STAIR PAN ADDITION
The Contractor was directed to fabricate and install a 16gauge galvanized metal
stair pan at the top of sevan stairways in Buildings 5 and 6. The stair pans were
necessary in order to contain the poured-in-place concrete second floor where it
meets the top of each stair. No detail was provided in the Contract Drawings for
this condition. This item of work was acccaplished by Contractor's force account
pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: EI:O 35)
ADDED COST THIS CHANCE OR M ITEM: $ 2,013.00
TIME EXT]ENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Gay
COUNTY GarnnmTICN DISIRICLS CF CRANE COUNTY Page 13 of 15
P. 0. SCC 8127 - 10844 ELT AVENUE
EOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA[ZECIaIIA 92708
CHANGE CIRCER
C. O. NO. Seven (7)
CanAAC M: J. R. Roberts Corporation I]A77: Novmber 14, 1990
JOB: S4A=USE AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING AND OM S'IC RAGE: AND DISPENSING
nAPROVEMENMS. JOB NO. J-20
Item 35 - FIFO; SPRUWM PIPING PAINTING CREDIT
The Districts agreed to accept 'a credit to the Contract in exchange for the
Contractor not being required to paint the fire sprinkler piping in Bulrling 4,
existing Shop Buildings A, B and Vehicle Maintenance Shop. The Contract
Specifications required all pipi to be painted. Painting deleted is for fire
sprinkler piping installed on the interior of enclosed buildings and not subject
to exterior corrosion. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor
pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions.
DEDNCIED COST THIS CHANCE CRDER TIM: ($ 8,086.00)
TINE EXOENSION THIS C EMM .CEDER. ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 36 - CREDIT EM W RKEENCHES AND S1CXII.S
The Districts agreed to accept a credit to the Contract in exchange for the
Contractor not being required to furnish workbenches and stools for Building 6 as
regrind by the Contract Specifications. The Districts will purchase the
workbenches and stools directly F the manufacturer in order to obtain specified
features not available from the Contractor's supplier. This item of work was
negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General
Provisions.
CREDIT THIS CMNCE OMMR TIEM: ($ 12,000.00)
TIME EXTEIISICN THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 37 - LEGAL EXPENSE
the
Contractor was required to cospensate the Districts for legal fees charged by
the D1QfTfrt9 for review and processing of the excessive amount of stop notices
filed against the project. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor
pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions.
CREDIT THIS CHANCE C RUM MEM: ($ 2,000.00)
TIME EXTENSIC N TFrT CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
COMM Sa***'m'n'm'*ON DI=CTS OF ORANM CO= Page 14 of 15
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 M-1 AVENUE
EL MnUN VA=, CALIEaUM 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. Seven (7)
CCLIMAL.'lOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE November 14. 1990
JOB: MMIOUSE AND NA\INMUNCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING
IMPFDVEMERrS, JOB NO. J-20
TOM ADDID COST THIS CBANGE ORDER: $ 204,087.60
TOPAZ TIME EXnWICN THIS CBANGE ORDER: 145 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract andaery extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore m b ally agreed that 145 days' extension
of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no
direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or
damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted
and approved by this Change Order.
SUH,%M OF CQUIRALT TII�
Original Contract Date February 27, 1989
Original Contract Time 240 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date October 24, 1989
Time zxtension this C.O. 145 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 196 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 436 Calendar Days
Revised Final Coopletion Due Date May 8, 1990
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not AppliAhle
Actual Final Coppletion Date Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 3,266,000.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 267,824.34
This Change (Add) (Dadu=) $ 204,087.60
Amended Contract Price $ 3,737,911.94
(DUNrY SANITATGCN DISMCTS OF ORANGH CO2 Y Page 15 of 15
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 FrT.TC AVENUE
FD BMUN VA=, Q¢aEaam1 92708
CBANCE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Seven (7)
CPC=: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE November 44. 1990
JOB: NAREBOUSE AND MlTl ENANCE BUILDING AND OM STORAGE AND DISPENSING
RMPROVEMENrS, JOB NO. J-20
Board Authorization Date: November 14, 1990
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORAsm 00 wY, GUaEZXNM
SUMMED BY: RECOMffi6IIED BY:
/a RQ/o "%2 p"
ineer Date Construction Manager Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
of Engineering to General Counsel Date
J. R. CORPORATION
/G Q c7
Contractor Da
COLMY SAtD.=CN DIS KILTS OF CHANCE COONTY Page 1 of 2
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ECT.TC AVENUE
FOMMLIN VALLEY, CAIXE0RMM 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. Eight (81
C(NMALTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE November 14. 1990
JOB: NAREHCDSE AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING
II FROVIIffiNTS, JOB NO. J-20
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ (57,500.001
In accotdanoe with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
folla+ing additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 - LIQUIDATED Dnnmrsc
The Contractor is assessed liquidated damages in the contract-specified mount of
$500.00 per day for the total mmber of days work that the contract was crnpletsi
beyond the contract-specified time of coupletion. The time subject to liquidated
damages is 115 calendar days, assessed pursuant to Section 6-6 of the General
Provisions.
DEDUCTED (DST TBLS CHANGE ORDER ITIIM: $ (57,500.00)
TIME EXMZION THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL DEDUCTED (DST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ (57,500.00)
TOTAL T1IE EXTENSILE] THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
SUMMARY OF CCUIRACT TIM
Original Contract Date February 27, 1989
Original Contract Time 240 Calendar Days
Original Coupletion Date October 24, 1989
Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Tire Extension 196 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 436 Calendar Days
Revised Final Coupletion We Date May 8, 1990
Time Subject to Liquidated Danages 115 Calendar Days
Actual Final Ccupletion Date August 31, 1990
CDMTY SAN TATICN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 2
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 FELTS AVENOB
FONDUN VALLEY, allJFUUTIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. Eight (8)
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE November 14. 1990
JOB: .6E AND W.INIENANCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING
D1FRCVEM=, JOB NO. J-20
Original Contract Price $ 3,266,000.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 471,911.94
This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ (57,500.001
Amend Contract Price $ 3,680,411.94
Board Authorization Date: November 14, 1990
COLRM SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CA11FU NIA
SMUTTED BY: REMMENIDED BY:
Engineer Late Construction Manager Date
APPROVED BY: APPROVED PS TO FORM:
Director of Engineering Date General Counsel Date
J. R. RCE= CORPORATION
ACCEPTED BY:
Contractor Date
COUNTY SAKI aN DISTRICTS OF ORAL COUNTY Page 1 of 2
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELiJS AVENUE
Euummm VALLEY, CALIF0Ru.LA 92708
CBANC£ ORDER
C.O. NO. Nine (9)
OaBRI%=: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE November 14, 1990
JOB: N UMUSE AND I9,IITMMNCB BUIIDnU, AND OM STOR M AND DISPENSING
IMPROVEMENTS, JOB NO. J-20
Amount of this Change Order (Add)(Da:3Act) $ 32,463.50
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to the contract price are hereby approved.
AMI STMENr OF ENGINEERS'S OUAWITIES
ADD:
Change in
Item uantity _
No. Unit Description From To Difference
A C.Y. Crushed Rock 0 1,007 1,007 @ $14.50 - $ 14,601.50
B C.Y. Crushed Rock 0 1,007 1,007 @ $16.00 - 16,112.00
C C.Y. Crushed Rock 0 100 100 @ $17.50 - 1,750.00
S BTOML _ $ 32,463.50
ADDED COST TBIS CBANGE ORDER ITE74: $ 32,463.50
TIME EXTENSION TBIS CBANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
SUMgIRY OF CONIEACr TINE
Original Contract Date EYbruary 27, 1989
Original Contract Time 240 Calendar Days
Original Completion DateOctober 24, 1989
Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 196 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 436 Calendar Days
Revised Find. Completion an Date Nay 8, 1990
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages 115 Calendar Days
Actual Final Ccmpletim Date August 31, 1990
CCU1M SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 2
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 EDITS AVENGE
Fa211.= VALLEY, CALIEMlIA 92708
CHANCE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Nine (9)
C@71RACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE Novak-- 44, 1990
JOB: 4YAM1OUSE AND NdS1=MNCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING
1� JOB No. J-20
Original Contract Price $ 3,266,000.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 414,411.94
This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 32,463.50
Amended Contract Price $ 3,712,875.44
Board Authorization Date: Novenber 14, 1990
COU= SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
SUBML= BY: RECOM+lE[1DED BY:
Engineer Gate Construction Manager Date
APPROVED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Director of Engineering Date General Counsel
J. R. FC= CMUU1SCN
ACCEPTED BY:
Contractor Date
�i
RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 1990 - 7:30 P.M.
j FUND NO 9399 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1310314C PAGE 1 >I
REPORT NUMBER AP43 )
COUNTY SANITATInx n15T 41CIS nE n9"
CLAIMS PAID ID/LO/90 POSTING DATE 10/10/90
WARRANT
109756 A-1 FENCE CO.. INC. $1.408.00 FENCING i �)
10975 ACI CONVENTIONon _IN.TWTWQ
30975E AGS 'COR PO RATION FEa
sgI99:50' GAUGE
109759 ADVANCED COMPUTER PROOUCYSCINC '.$54.09 COMPUTER HARDWARE - )
109761 AIM MANAGEMENT $619.04 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
n 109762 AIR COLD SUPPLY INC. S31.68 ELECTRICAL PART e ')
109 3 AIR OD . GE S
I17 109769 LEASING ASSOCIATES/ALLSTATE 325.00 LBAEE VBIIICLS CNARG88"
10917 5 ALLERGAN PHARMACEUTICAL $3'1}63.69, REPUNp USBA FEE OVERPAYMENT
109767 AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY S65.86 BATTERIES
109768 BLAME P. ANDERSON SSO.29 NESTING EXPENSE v -)
109769 AP L CORP VALUE ART
3 109770 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $8,356.71 NOTICES G ADS
- 309771 ARATEM SERVICES. INC. S5R998.56 UNIFORM RENTALS )
A R
OO 209773 - AMSA - CONF. OF COASTAL AGENCY 1 $90.00 REGISTRATION ee
109779 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $61,366.12 GRIT REMOVAL N.U.7-13-88 )Y
11 R a SAFETY SUPPLIES N
109T76 SANK:gF AMER ICA-C.A.S.C. f BSI A.}3 .: R G COUP A80 RSi' C.O.P.
1097Ti P.W. BAR07T1' ANp AS SOL. S jlS7.50 ,- CONOTRUCTBAXTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS SON BS#VECSq P1-34-2,P2-37rr . )
Cy .109779 BAYLESS STATIONERS 5171.12 OFFICE SUPPLIES
109780 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $56.00 RADIATOR REPAIR )In 109781a - TRUCE
PARTS
109782 THE BONG BUYER ,' .$150.00 SUBSCRIPTION
.-. 109783 BORLAND INTERNATIONAL ,1,, � $158.95 COMPUTBR 00PPNAR8 .)
RVICKSJ-1
—I 109785 BRENNER-FIEDLER 6 ASSOC.. INC. S496.13 MECHANICAL PARTS
(A 1097B6 BRITHINEE ELECTRIC $1,078.93 ELECTRIC MCTOR .
1097E N 6 CALDWELL $5,973.80 LAB SERVICES
109788 BROWN G CALDWELL CBS SULTINPL STS.729.33 IMIRSERING BBRVICES J-19,P2-37
109789 THE BUREAU Of NATIONAL Aff{IRS L^ �S1.013.2n - PUBLICATION
109790 n F i�`.. ELECTRIC
209791 BUTIER ENGINEERING. INC. - S65.000.60 SETTLEMENT M.O. 10-10-90
109792 GARY G. STREEO $1,140.99 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
109793 C.O. A MEMBERSHIP FEES
10979A CS COMPANY i ' S8I913.0I ,: VALVE PARTS'.
109795 CAL FLE} INC. INC, q.500.00 7 BIOIPUSERB FEE OVERPAYMENT :1 J
209796 UL-ELA9 FOR FPL
109797 CALTROL . INC. a $1,767.26 INSTRUMBNT PARTS
10979E CA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY S4.692.60 OCEAN MONITORING - BIOASSAY STUDISS
10,79 9 CAL FORK P LIC NAN SUBSCRIPTION - PROFESIONAL JOURNAL
109800 SWRCB ACCOUNTING OFFICE -' $2,300.00 SNRCR EEe `""
109801 CALIFORNIA TAXPAYERS- ASS OC. $49.00 SUBSCRIPTIONS- TECHNICAL JOURNAL p
n )
n ,
N FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WDNKING CAPITAL PROCCSSING DATE 10/33/9W PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43 )
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OR NOE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 10/117 0 POSTIN{ GATE 30/19/94
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
3090D2 CAROLLO-SOYLE ENGINEERS $1.952.02 ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 89-125
109803 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS f19 910.4 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-15
109004 CENT CENTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM $1,421.47. P 481E
109805 CENTURY SAFETY INST., i'{UPP. 6.21: SAFETY SUPPLIES • )
109806 YARDLEY INSTRUMENTS f{N* fg0.26 INSTRUMENT PARTS
109807 CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC. f13.215.74 DIBSSL FUEL
109808 CHROME CRANKSHAFT. INC. $1.280.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
109009 CLEAN-EX JANITORIAL SUPPLY f JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
m 9 C ESSO R COMPONENTSOF CALIF"' f3R05.00.
MECHANICAL PARTS
Z 109811 COMPUTER BAY i1,852.82. COMPUTER HARDWARE �� )
_C7 109812 COMPUSERVE 117.59 COMPUTER SERVICES.
109813 DON-WAY WESTERN EXPRESS $73.61 FREIGHT
199814 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. f0.957.1♦ ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
ry 109815 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO $5,669.50 CHLORINE M.0.30-11-89 9
3 309816 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS' S1A#929.57 DEP'RIfmTNQ
1 D9B17 COOPER INDUSTRIES. INC. . {929. RNGINE PARTS
109ECOUNTY WHOLESALERLECTRIC SUPPLIES D'
00 109819 CRANE VEYOR CORP. f2.613.67 1
109820 CHEMICAL PROCESSORS. INC. f1.165.72 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES )G
109821 CRYSTAL CLEAR WINDOW MAINT. t WINDOW CLEANING v
09822 CALIFORNIA CHAMBER Of COMMERCE
r 109823 DANIEL$ TIRE SERVICE ' i26.54 TIRE§
r 109824 N.A. OA COMPANY 1. $357.24 TRUCK PARTS
109825 TOM DAMES f49.37 MKKT V,
O 109826 DETAILS. INC. 92.683.20 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT yy
109627 DEW-PAR SALES 6 SERVICE 0. MANHOLE COVERS
UR D/OR CS CO. i220.66 PRINTING
A 1g9B21 DIFILI/PO ASSOCIATES,'. y 6757.57
'-� 109830 016ITAL EQUIPMENT CORP.' f145.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT a,
T' 109531 DORADO ENTERPRISES. INC. f6H5U.00 �ATNTENAACS-6'-REPATR
O�jl 109332 DORR-OLIVES. INC. $Lg57.91 MECHANICAL PARTS )
109833 DUNKEL BROS. MACH MOVING SPACE RENTAL J-19A
109834 DURq TECH PROCESSES ". i122.96 REFUND UsElt, run OVERFAYM...
-
1G9835 - D-VALS SALES ' , $190.81 PISTINGB . )
109836 E I ' INSTRUMENTS, ELECTRIC PARTS
109837 CIM CO/NSS SUPPLY $1.636.25 ROMeN
109638 ENSECO-CRL $1.200.00 OCEAN SAMPLING :) !
109819 EAST NAN INC. 1623.14 OFFICE eUPPLIEB
109890 Y. X. EBERT CORP. f?5{.579.00 - -
1098g1 ENCHANTER. INC. �pq.BB O.Op OCEAN MONITORING ICES 30-90
109042 ERNST i YOUNO :t3.415.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES .�
109643 FMC CORP. $100.00 T
109844 FARR SALES 6 SERVICE $1,172.79 FILTERS
109895 FEDERAL EXPRES CORP. AIR FREIGHT
109846 - FERRELL6A5 - f22.95rROPANs
. 109B47 FILTER SUPPLY CO. ''�� f839.09 ENGINE PARTS ) R
n a
a
v
-r
W FUND NO 9199 — JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSIND DATE 10103/9G PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CLAIMS PAID 10/10/90 POSTING DATE 10/10/90 )
WARRANT NO YENOOR AN
109848 FIRE MASTER $1.153.50 SAFETY SUPPLIES r
109Bg9 iISCHER t PORTER CO. CHLORINATION PARTS
109850 ISME0. SCI NTIFIC CO. ',�i1}7.31 CONCRETE C177TING
109851 FLAT 6 VERTICAL CONCRETE }143*521 - WATER U88
309832 CIT Of FOUNTAIN VALLEY INBTRUMBNT PART
109853 HC F KRDRO CO. tB 6.4E HAAINMAR81LU1�BR ' `�
101854 64N4XL LUNGES CO. 91,644.52 OFFICE MACHINE
109855 GENERAL BINDIH6 CORP. NSTRUMEN PART
r, 10985E 6E NERAL EL[CTft IC. CO. t2271gY.91 TELEPHONE SERVICES
Z 109857 GENERAL TELEPHONE CD. - i21:1.39, MECHANICAL PARTS
C7 10985E SURVEYING DSRVICES RED 8
109859 DON GREEK t ASSOCIATES S14.2i2.9S V"V's )
109860 GRINNCLL CORPORATION 5251.1E LAB SUPPLIES
—1 109861 MACH COMPANY TAUCB
F 109E 62 HAP IN6 TON INOUS7 RIA4 PLASTICS 15.69 j
3 1O9B63 HATCH t KIRK. INC. S2.ODS.50 ENGINE PARTS,
109869 XAULAVAT CONTAINERS _ BIN RENTALS S
00 1098fi5 P.L. MAWN CO.. INC. f233.3fi FILTER )P
10986E IS WIN HAYDOCK � �q 594.00 MEETING EXPENSE
109867 NOERBIBFR O Y S GLii Y"fi�'—'F'T-- MECHANICAL PARTS
y 199868 HOUSE'DE BATTERIES 31D2.90` — LEGAALRSERVICES + OXFORD CASUALTIES
F'- 109869 HOUSTON AND WILSON 465.43 PAINT SUPPLIES '^ P.
r 309810 R HUGHES CO IN
109871 .HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCMYINN CTCL f2.519.40 BI ANIS )
1098T2 ISED. INC. S356.55 MECHANICAL PARTS „Y
.-� 109873 IMPERIAL WEST CHE MICA FERMONO`
OUS/FERRIC CHLOR M.O.4-11-90,11-08-89
109879 IN I4L TNREpBEO PRODUCTS S226.21 BCTOR • )
A 309875 INFILCD OEGREMONT. INC. f1.60q•27 MECHANICAL PARTS
r.H N6 JANITORIAL BUPPLIB9
..H 309BTT INSIDE E.P.A. VC EKLT REPORT f53.25 PUBLICATION
Cr) 109875 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT t30.84 WATER USE
109E T9 J.L.A. CREDIT YOR P. LEASE AGRBEMHNT — MICROFICHE MACHINE
098fl0 t3TD.85 WESTIN0 BYPBN98 . ' e1
109881 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY?1 � $474.29 ELECTRIC PARTS
109882 KALLEE •S COMPUTER SUPPLIES $713.46 PRINT SUPPLIES
109883 KAMAN BEARINIS 6 SUPPLY f206.27 FITTINGS •• .,,
109B84 KA TZ. HOL LI3. CDREN t -ASSOC. 6300.00 PUBLICATION
109E BS KEEN AN 6 ASSDCI AT FS WORKERS COMP ADMINISTRATIVE FEE
109686 THE NE I TA COMP6RIES TEMPORARY
_ 1
1 A 90B7 KELLY SERVICCS,;j:. $;,3890.78. MNBTAARY SERVICES
CONBTRUCIIOM 5-34-2 — RETENTION RELEASE
109889 KSNNERLE BRO3.. INC.• PUMP
109890 NINE BEARING. INC. i11.94 S.OS MECHANICAL PARTS 7
109091 AK IE 7 KLEEN�LI JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
UN
109892 NOR. MARSH. JOKES t DO RAN R27.23 LEGAL DBR IC — UN R C ,,
10989] KNOK INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES — Q t%22.86 T0008
x ' :JP
.1
f
ri
D FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/35/90 PAGE G
REPORT NUMBER AP43 )
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 0 10 90 POSTING DATE 10 30 90
WARRANT ND. VENDDR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
109894 VLADIMIR K069N $44.12 MILEAGE REINBURSEMENT
209895 MARTIN KOROICK. SR $1.505.03 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 5-35-1
09896 LEEDS f NORTHRUP 6372.0E
109897 HOWARD LEMBRE - $62.49 MEETING EXPENSE
109898 JOHN LISEE PUMPS. INC. $140.06 PUMP PARTS
109899 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 02 $1.100.07 DMPU•PER�IIP'I9i ::.
n 10990E DON LUCCHESI $475.00 PERMIT REFUND
G-1 10990t NDT BIOLOGIC COMPANY f23q.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
Z 1 9902 MPS SERVICES
109903 MACONCO i=87.20- 9ERVIC6 AGRESMBNT _ )
10..0' MARINE 6 VALVE SUPPLY i931.19 CNLORINATION SUPPLIES p
109905 .MARVAC ELECTRONICS $31.19 f'FR-UNENf�UFPLIEB
309906 MATT - CHLOR. INC. St.987.92 CHLORINATION FRUITS
-1 109907 MAXWELL COLORS - $7.87 PHOTO PROCESSING
10990E MCKINLEY EQUIPMENT CORP f399.31
109909 MICRO MOTION *449.10 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1
St 109910 MICROAGE COMPUTER �f0.117.09 COMPUTER HARDIMUE v .
OO 109911 MICROAGE COMPUTER STORES f740.19 COMPUTER
109912 MIDLAND MFG. CORP. $79.85 CHLDRINATION PARTS ')C
209913 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. 661.0E ELECTRIC SUPPLIES -
109914 JAMES M. MONTGOMERYEffallimmsmltvi-BXRUICXS ..6'173 9 -
r- 109915 MOORE PRODUCTS CO. .F - f759.5E VALVE PARTS ) .
r ]09916 NORTON SALT AND/OR ! BALT
109917 MOTION INDUSTRIES. INC. i92.00 MARTIN.. w
209918 MOTOROLA INC. $4.339.98 COl01UNICATIONS EQUIPMENT )g
309919 MURPNY SAFETY SWITCH f1601.91 ELECTRIC PARTS
9 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES. INC. '. i390.00
109921 GUST K. NEWBERG CONEY. CO., 33. 63.966.69 CONSTRUCTION P1-33 )
�' 109922 NEWARK ELECTRONICS i195.g2 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
119123 NORTHGATE COMPUTER SYSTEMS 5136.0E COMPUINK'Pwr
(A 209924 OFFICE PAVILION/INTERIOR RES. 51.030.41 OFFICE FURNITURE J-7-0
109925 DX SYSTEMS CO. 512522.92 CHLORINE M.O. 2-10-90
109926 ORANGE BEARING. -14C. - f160.25
109927 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY 671.72 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
10992E ORANGE COUNTY L CO. CHEMICALS -
209929 ORANGE VALVE f FITTING CO. 61.043.73 INGO ,y
109930 OSCAR•S LOCK S SAFE $97.63 KEYS
109931 OVERSPRAY REMOVAL SYSTEMS SZ,kZg.oQ OVERSPRAY REMOVAL CN'
19932 OXYGEN SERVICE f98 B.79UPS.ALTY GAMI. {;}
109933 COUNTY OF QRANGE " iT 028.0E DATA PROCESSING PER
10993q COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT lb•640•gl RSIMBUIRER WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FUND
PSSC i2.204.15 S Elt-VI6$�E81[VIC
109936 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $3.571.48 SAFETY SUPPLIES
109937 PACIFIC BELL S01.9i TELEPHONE SERVICES " A
109938 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING CO. S68.g0 'DOE
209939 PACTEL CELLULAR i69.20 CELLULAR TELEPHONE 86RVICBB
4
U; FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 13/05/90 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CLAIMS PAID 10/10/90 POSTING DATE 10/10/90 c )
WARRANT N0. V N OR
109940 PAGENET $64.94 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
109941 PpNp NA JOE•S/RED ONION $736.03 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT ,
309992 PA OpP. T TLOR IN$iR• 13,/57.99 INSTRUMENT PART
109943 PlNAGRO SYS7 EMSTINCr 390�S09.J0: SLUOGB REMOVAL N.O.5-11-88
1099N POLYPURE INE $13 ,59T 02 POLYMERS M.O.1-10-90 8-9-89
10999E PORTER SAILER S_eh
VICE, INC. $83.D0 FITTINGS
n 209946 POWER SYSTEMS $72.69 MECHANICAL PARTS
109947 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE 1144.00 ICE
Z i F J Is SOLUTION c se161e ao xxsTRlf-NR-N3APYbFTLNe
C7 109949 PUMP ENGINEERING CO. S1T9.72. PUMP PARTS
109950 "j"TRAR PRYOR RESOURCES 659 00 REGISTRATION, TRAINING
191,51 $UALI7T HYDRAULICS 192.14 PUMP PARTS
109952 R.P.M. ELECTRIC MOTORS i542.81 GENERATOR REPAIR )
09953 R. • VIDEO $979,76 INSTRUMENT REPAIR u
3 309959 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. '11.050.61 TRASH BIN REMOVAL
109955 RECRUITMENT.SFECIALTS74 IN7•Lp. )', iT90.00 REGISTRATION, TRAINING
99 E '.:; VALVE '..
W 109957 RED WING SHOES . $244.72 9AFST SHOES )
10995E THE REGISTER $929.67 NOTICED 6 ADS
]09959 REMOTE METED ESE tN6 S EM D POSTAGE
�- 109960 Tn. REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO♦ fi . - ." 24527.01
F` 109961 M3 L70N AI VERA $488.86 ' MEETING, EXPENSE, INSPECTION P2-92-1 f 8Q 'jg
fT 1D9962 1. R' RDBEPTB '� t- 3 CONSTRUCTION J-17 S
CJ 109963 J. p. ROBERTS $49.549.75 CONSTRUCTS 11 -
RO 6
.--i 109964 BINSON FERTILIZER CO. 96,195.75 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES )
(n 104965 ROS NON' N 3 TRANSMITTER
109966 RUTAN 1 7UCNER - 6 1,578.92 L D
F
109967 JOSE PH T, RYERSON & SOW, C�`'{ `. 1y 697.1g BASIN REPAIR$,-' , )
109268 ." EN._..,r , . r PUBLICATIONS
—I 109969 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. 1132.80 PARTS CLEANER
CO 109970 SALES TECHNOLOGY $495.00 REGISTRATION, TRAINING ;]L
109971 SANCON ENGINEERING INC, CONSTRUCTION 3-33R
109972 SANT{�.:.ANA RIVER FLOOD 1,9D0.00 NSMBTRRIIIP F888, - -
109973 DRUG .'ARVIS .. 'S350.00 REGISTRATION, TRAINING,' ,
1099 H 90N ..E - CONSTRUCTION P2-40,P1-27-1R2
109975 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT•L 1191.465.26 OCEAN MONITORING N.O. - -
109976 SEARS, ROEBUCK 6 CO. $745.44 FREEZER J
109977 S.F [ NESTING EXPENSE, INSPECTION P1-34-2
10997E SHAMROCK $UPP LY 1 519.71 TOOLS "-
309979 MICHAEL 'S[LV ERSTEI N' f208.93 _ MEETING, SYPIN86, TRAINING`
099D 1 .50 SOIL TESTING
109981 SOFT YAREMOUSE/WESTERN REGION- $264.68 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
109982 S01L 6 PLANT LABORATORY $451.00 BOIL EVALUATION '] ,
109 83 WATER USE
109989 . SOUTHERN CALIF• EOISON C0.' 1,933.51 "" POWER '*`+
109985 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO• j'J,A03.1B- OIL 5 GREASE
I
t
ri
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE IV/63/9C PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43 /
_ COUYTY SpNIT AiION_Q 18TRICT3 F GRAN¢E_COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID lU%10/90 ,POSTING DATE 10/10/90
WARRANT N0. VENDOR 440UNT DESCRIPTION
109966 STAMEN Z. SPASSOFF. P.E. $720.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-34-2 )
209987 YESTALLOY INC. 51.266.65 WELDING SUPPLIES a
---= S 8 AR 0 6 S PPLY CO. $2.065.vs-TwurL;
109989 MANFRED STOPPER 6260.29 MEETING EXPENSE, INSPECTION P1-33
109990 STRATEGIC MATERIALS CORP. $968.00 PUMP PART i
-�a9 9-�1 SUNNIT STEEL $150.77 eTEEt-
n 109992 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL. INC. $6.495.69 TOOLS
109993 T 6 C INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS INC $558.04 ELECTRIC PARTS ��A
fTl 94
T YNE ANRLTTICAL - .. $256.63 INSTRUMENT '
Z 109995 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD $3.729.36 TRUCK PARTS )
d 309996 THERMO ENVTL INST. INC. _ $339.51 INSTRUMENT REPAIR
999i ONY•S LOCK 6 SAFE SERVICE $162.24 RE48-
109999 TOTAL TECHNICAL SERVICES *257.75 WELDING INSPECTION SERVICE9 )
--1 209999 TRAVEL TRAVEL $q.012.00 TRAVEL SERVICES M.O.6-13-90 _��, _q.:
3 F0�— TRU K L AUTO SUPPLY. INC. _t1.228.29 —9'RUCR�ARTB '- rJ;+>y.
111,20091 TRUCKUARE $2.351.30 TRUCK PARTS .r )
l 110008 4L6. TUCKER t SON. INC. (77.96 INSTRUMENT PARTS $1
'
00 11Fra3 UNOCAL SI38.63 UNLEADED-OAS0LTN9--" L fi
110004 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE S109.35 PARCEL SERVICES )TL
110005 VUR SCIENTIFIC _ 62 395.63 LAB SUPPLIES ;.
00 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. 5.551.88 FLDIIDI'RG-SUPP -
r 110007 ROSEMOUNT/VAREC DIVISION 1.738.75 MECHANICAL PARTS �^ 1
T- 13000E VARIAN INSTRUMENT GROUP _ 2.114.37 LAB SUPPLIES _
110009 VEIFTEY SYSTEMS $1.040.00 OMP`UTER�ATA-NA71NTSNANC1--
___
110010 'VICI METRONICS $276.47 INSTRUMENT PART
110011 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY f73.99 SAFETY SUPPLIES KK y
100 HAfl rAN V61GTS $i S.lg MILSAGI -1..RBEMER. S
PO 110013 RICHARD Y. VON LANGEN $I5B.IS MEETING EXPENSE: )_
i-a 110014 LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES INC. ]j 0.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Y . OORN LA NT. NC. f108.98 -PUBLYCATIb7� n
CN 110016 WEST COAST TERMINALS, INC. S3.001.51 OFFICE URCHINS )'
110017 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY AIt.105.09 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-8-90
ASSOCIATES 6507.04 ENCIA6BRIMC JBAVIC ...... F�
110019 XEROX CORP. 3.123.76 COPIER LEASES ')
110020 GEORGE YARDLEY COMPANY. $399.69 VALVES _
y rIIFFf— JOHNSON TOK GAYA CORP S217.99 --�N�'Y1lUHENT-PARY'
110022 ZIEBARTN AND ALPER _ 6 I69106.73 CONSTRUCTION P2-37 )
101728 BRINDERSON CORP. $400.273.00 CONSTRUCTION J-19-2 •
-__ ----- ---- ,
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 20/10/90 $8,895.770.12
v vvvvvv 4'
S 1i^
n X
V -
FUND NO 9199 - JT DSST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 09/20/ PAGE 7
REPORT NUMB%A Ap4349
COUNTY MANITATI DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 20 )
CLAIMS PAID 10/10/90 POSTING DATE 30/10/90
SUMMARY AMOUNT
M R1 OPER FUND $468.65
zn' 91 OONST FUND ,779.28
92 OPER FUND f$2,432.82 I
p tl2 CAP FAC FUND - fI 196.76
42 CONBT FUND 3336.66
tl3 OPER POND f680,396.69
tl3 CONST FUND .3463.76
M 45 OPER FUND $3,398.27
3 tl5 CAP FAC FUND 4703,789.50
86 OPER FUND f320.9B /
tl7 0PER FUND $2,490.86
CO 47 CAP FAC FUND f475.00
I #11 OPER FUND $6,928.62
#13 OPER FUND $86.35
D R14 OPEN FOND $24.77
tl19 CAP FAC FUND $1,746.88
tl566 OPER FOND $18.06
CJ 8667 0PER FOND 2479.85 )
'--� 07614 OPER FOND $24.18
JT OPER FOND $685,624.78
M CORF $6,550,169.68
.. SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FUND $21,063.65
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND _ $209_668 37-
$0,895,770.12
7
n )
I
v �
1>y •
1
~ FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST YOPKINO CAPITAL P30CESSING DATE 1:/17"1 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43 1
COUNTY SANITATION 01 Y
CLAIMS PAID 10/24/90 POSTING DATE 30/24/90
VENDOR R • DESCRIPTION
116041 AT 6 7 $273.59 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICE
a SAFETY SUPPLIES
210043 ADVANCE INDUSTRIAL $36.87 ELECTRIC PARTS
110049 AIRWAY SCALE COMPANY S575.62 SCALE MAINTENANCE /
110045 _ LEASING ASSOCIATESIALLSTATE 9305,CR AUTO REPAIRS .
11C046 ALPHA6AZ $634.82 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
D I1G49i ALTA SALES INC $376.21 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
0AMER SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENAR $30.00 ADVERTISING
m 110049 BOSCO INC R/OR AMERICAN BE S10.954.33 HARDWARE
2 110050 AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY $2.085.11 POLAROID FILM t )
L7 110051 COPIER LEASE
a 110052 ANAHEIM SEVER CONSTRUCTION $2,972.06 SEVER REPAIRS DIST 7
,--i 110053 APCO VALVE 6 PRIMER CORP S335.80 VALVE PARTS . )
-PLUS SYSTEMS f 9 NOTICES 6 ADS
3 11005E 4R120NA INSTRUMENT $1,925.44 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS
11005E ARK TECHNOLOGIES �600.00 CONSULTING - USSR FEE PROGRAM
FALCON DISPOSAL SERVT&r GRIT REMOVAL M.O. 7-13-86
A 114058 SABSON 6 SHEPPARD S1491S.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES - OIL WELLS m
110059 DISPLAYS om
BACKFLOY PREVENTION DEVICE $405.00 BACKFL TESTING )R
D 116061 BANK OF AMERICA f98.00 - BANE CARDS
r 110062 PW BAROTTI AND ASSOC f5�q;12.50 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES P1-34-2,P2-32 ' )
f- LAB SUPPLIES
116064 8 BATEMAN $595.00 DBFHRA80 COMP DISTRIBUTION
C I1OC65 BARTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS f5.194.91 LAB SUPPLIES )$
97ST.09 OFFICE 9UPPLI89
S
110067 R09ERT BEIN WILLIAM FROST f1 02.9E ENGINERRING SERVICES 5-34
_ HT'
11006E BESTYAY TRANSPORTATION 87.94 FREIGHT' )
DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
07
--I 1140 BORLAND INTERNATIONAL $1.030.36 COMPUTER SOFTWARE Y
Cn 110071 BRINDERSON CORP S594.317.16 CONSTRUCTION J-19-2 )
LAB SERVICES
110073 BROWN {^ CALOYELL CONSULTING fl 22.76 ENGINEERING SERVICES P2-23-5,P2-35-2,3,4,
110674 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE 3R.23 PUBLICATION
n eeTS P SURVEYING SERVICES AGE 88-71
11Y076 GARY G STREED 4574.1E PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
I10077 PAL-CHER SALES $966.41 HAROWARE
INSTRUMENT PART
110079 CALIFORNIA FILTRATION >�'�41.06 MECHANICAL PARTS
110080 CALLAWAY� CHEMICAL CO S39T 74.12 POLYMER W.O. 8-8-90 ;)
TRAINING
110082 CAPITAL WESTWARD $2.496.23 GAUGE
110083 JOHN CAROLLD EN014EERS 4325.331.34 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-36,P2-42,P1-34 .�
TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
110085 CENTURY SAFETY INST 6 SUPP }192.42 SAFETY SUPPLIES
110086 CERTIFIED APPLIANCE COINC 42.00 LAB REPAIRS
GO
PN4
PJ FUND NO 9199 - JT )1ST VOPMING CAPITAL Pi OCESSING DATE 10/27/90 P46E 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43 1
CLAIMS PAID 10/24/90 . POSTING DATE 10/24/90
If00Bl AN CH ESTERTON LA $1.62 MECHAHICAL PARTS )
n rpRp necY cYor r FIRS a UIPMBNT MAINTBRANCE
110089 COMPRC5800. COMPONENTS OF CA ifr 927.91 PUMP PARTS
110090 COMPUTER BAT '' 399.81 OFFICE SUPPLIES ., )
WORKS HE" REPAIR
110092 CONNELL GM PARTS / DIV $34.35 TRUCK PARTS
y 11009! CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL GIST 34.094.87 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES )
HARDWARE
FPi 110095 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS 4,399.29 SLURPRINTING
a 130096 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 C flDj G62.11 -
C7 SOIL TESTING
INIC
MECHANICAL REPAIRS
3)0498 COSTA .MESA AUTO SUPPLY $552.39 TRUCK PARTS
.� 110099 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 33.83 ELECTRIC PARTS . )
MILEAGE EXPENSE
3 110141 CRANE VEYOR CORP -''.3331.01 PAINT SUPPLIES
110102 LARRY CURTI TRUCK 0 EOUIPM 321i660.00 - SLUDGE REMOVAL M.O.7-11-90 )
IESEL USE TAX A
W "0'04 STATE BOARD OF EOUALIZAT ION •• f60.15 HAZARDOUS WASTE TM
110105 CALIF STATE WA TER RESOURCES f5.029.00 REFUND GRANT OVERPAYMENT )f
STORAGE CLEAN-UP F
130107 GAILY PILOT 9/0.51I ADVERTISING
110108 DATAPRO RESEARCH CORP ;, 356.00 SUBSCRIPTION, TECH JOURNAL )
TRAFFIC COWBOY, SIMS -9
110110 DE ANZA CORPORATION 9150.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
110111 DE GUELLE 3 SONS GLASS CO $534.99 BUILDING REPAIRS )j
nisen PRINT COMPANY OFFICE FURNITURE - FILING SYSTEM ffiF}}
110113 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC f10 999.49 PLANT REPAIRS -S MAINTENANCE
A 110114 JOSEPH S DUDOR PE �1720.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES • )
PAINTPPLIES
—1 116116 ENSECO-CRL $1.200.00 DORM SAMPLING
Cn 110117 EASTMAN INC $1,416.37 OFFICE SUPPLIES )�
RENTAL UI ME
110119 ENCHANTER INC f 200.00 "OCEAN MONITORING M.O. 3-14-90
110128 MARSHALL FAIRRES 178.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION . )
I. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES M.O. 12-13-8
110122 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP $615.00 AIR FREIGHT PARTS )110123 FISCHER A PORTER CO $4,352.39
LAB SUPPLIES
118125 FLAT 6 VERTICAL CONCRETE )123.00 CONCRETE CUTTING
110126 FLO-SYSTEMS f505.18 PIPE )
^.Pt P RT8
11C128 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $77.53 FILM
11Y129 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $2,934.78 PAINT SUPPLIES
f SAFETY CONSULTANT
110131 AROENE FRET f105.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
110132 CITY OF FULLERTON Af 110.13 WATER USE J
C17
1
i
CO '
W FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE IC/17/96 PACE 3
R=PORT NUMBER APA3COUNTY SANITATION )ISTRICTS OF ORANGE t;UNTY
)
CLAIMS PAID 10/24/90 POSTING DATE 10/24/90
WARRANT R AMOUNT DESC IP ION
130133 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO 06.243.S2 TELEPHONE SERVICES 7
110134 GEORGE LEECH t ASSOCIATES $52.75 FITTINGS
110135 GIERLICH-MITCHELL INC SS.897.79 NECIUNICAL PARTS
110136 GORDON-S INC ra175.74 OFFICE SUPPLIES • )
STREET SWEEPING SERVICES
11013E DON SREEK 6 ASSOCIATES $19.636.25 SURVEYING SERVICES RES 88-72
D 3101}9 GRINNELL CORPORATION f1.847.20 VALVE � ' '{:•
FRED A HARPER S1,495.10 DEFENDED COMP DISTRIBUTION
F11 I16111 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLANTE "$376.14 HARDWARE
Z IlO1gY HARRIS ADACOM -f239.63 COMPRESSOR REPAIR )
t7 ENGINE PARTS
11Y111 HAULANAY CONTAINERS $1.593.00 CONTAINER RENTAL
110145 HILTI INC SB47.51 HARDWARE )ti HOERBIGKR CVS CALIF INC $1,96B.34 MECHANICAL PARTS
3 110117 DONALD D NOMOMICHL y'6300.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
110110 MOUSE OF BATTERIES ':f519.49 BATTERIES
TRAVEL EXPENSES
00 110250 AS HUGHES CO INC •6471.86 HARDWARE
1I0131 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SI7.42 WATER USE )
HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBERA 599.51 RUBBER STAMPS b
118153 IEEE SERVICE CENTER - CET'/ fS6.91 PUBLICATION
r 118154 IRS INDUSTRIES 233.53 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
-
r - FERRIC CHLORIDE N.D.11-8-89
C 110156 INDUSTRIAL RESOURCES $250.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
110157 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1.201.69 CONNRCTORS )6
92 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES S"
-1 116159 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. 193.64 TRUCK PARTS
Itel60 INTERNATIONAL INS INC p0.15 - HARDWARE )
LAB SUPPLIES C
--1 110162 JLA CREDIT CORP - $145.32 MICROFICHE LEASH
f/) 110163 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP 91,413.44 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
MEETING EXPENSES .
110165 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 526.55 ELECTRIC PARTS
118166 KAMAN BEARINGS i SUPPLY - f9I.2B FITTINGS
TOOL
110168 KELLY SERVICES $150.69 TEMPORARY SERVICES
116169 KENKO INC S243.761.90 CONSTRUCTION 5-34-2
110110 KING BEARING INC MACHINE SUPPLIES
110171 KROMNE AMERICA INC t 9S1.A0 INSTRMENT PART
110172 L 6 C TIRE SERVICE - fT 6.q0 TRUCK PARTS :)
ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-33
114174 LEEDS 6 NORTHRUP S1.565.75 INSTRUMENT PARTS
110175 LEVIS PUBLISHERS INC S35.00 PUBLICATION
MECHANICAL PARTS
110177 KP LINDSTROM INC 769.01 CONSULTING - HIS COMPLIANCE
STOTTS LORAIN PRODUCTS 116.22 INSTRUNHtNT PART
b0
�N
A
i.
y
n FUND NO 919R - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 11117191 PAGE A
REPORT NUMBER AP43 )
CLAIMS PAID 10/24/90 POSTING DATEr 10/24090 )
I10179 AJ LYNCH CO 31.912.80 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES r ')
PHOTCHRMPHIC SERVICES
110181 - MARVAC ELECTRONICS 0S76.65 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
130182 MATT CHLOR INC S1J256.66 CHLORINATION PARTS .,
PHOTO PROCESSING
111184 XCKENNA ENGR 6 EQUIP SIO.1S1.75 PUMP PARTS
y 130165 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO $60.07 BUILDING NATBRIAL9 e j
MILEAGE RB INBUR9BMENT
Z 130187 XE RCN A CO JNC P_ $35.90 PUBLICATION
C 1IJ188 METER CRAFT INC , ,- SBq.72 ELECTRIC REPAIRS ' )
INSTRUMENT
110190 MILLAR ELEVATOR SERVICE $4-72.66 SERVICE AGREEMENT
21.1191 MILLTRONICS $2,155.25 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES )
SAFETY SUPPLIES 6k
3 110193 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES i .756.40 LAB SERVICES 4�
110194 MORTON SALT AND/OR @: 53.25 SALT' )
E FITTINGS
ON 11C196 MOTOROLA INC 575.00 RADIO REPAIRS i
I I019] MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICES $83.42 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES )S
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES FF
r110199 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM 556.18 FEINTING
110200 -CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $A.00 WATER USE
TRASH BINS '
p 110202 OFFICIAL AIRLINE GUIDES $360.00 PUBLICATION 9
i--i 110203 OX SYSTEMS CO 531.729.57 CHLORINE M.O. 2-14-90
TRAVEL EXPENSE
110205 ORANGE BEARING INC g45.27 MECHANICAL PARTS
..y 130206 ORANGE COAST- ELECTRIC SUPPL f 5S4.35 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES )
PRINTING
y I10208 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO $1,325.78 CHBMIGLB N
I1J209 ORANGE VALVE A FITTING CO. $506.05 FITTINGS
KEYS
110211 OXYGEN SERVICE - 327.29 SPECIA GA LTY RBS
12.0212 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT f. .429.36 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP SFI )
SAFETY SUPPLIES
l IU214 PACIFIC BELL $28.98 TELEPHONE SERVICES
116215 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING C $60.40 RENTAL EQUIPMENT '� )
TRUCI PARTS
110217 PATTER CORP/ TAYLOR INSTR jG476.65 INSTRUMENT PART
11021E PEARSONS LAWNMOWER CENTER - 221.89 TOOL REPAIR )
AUDITING SERVICES N.C. 3-9-89
110220 ROT PENDERGRAFT $g95.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
11U221 PHOTO 6 SOUND CO $749.69 COMPUTER PART :7
SLUDGE REMOVAL
110223 PITNEY BOWES 1T3.31 POSTAGE METER RENTAL
110224 PLAINS TRUEYALUE HARDWARE ' 325.47 - HARDWARE -)
lb
I
FUND KO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1.117190 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43 )
COUNTY SANITATION DISTJICTS OF ORANGE
CLAIMS PAID 10/21/90 POSTING DATE 10124190
VARRANT NO, w[NDOR AMOUNT OESCRIPTIOAJ
110225 POLYPURE INC a20.655.54 POLYMERS M.O.1-10-90,8-B-8 )
11026 PORTER 301LER SrRYrCf INC a2 1.25 BUILDING MATERIAL
110227. POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO $192.31 ELECTRIC BVPPLIeB
110228 POWER SYSTEMS - $197.56 ELECTRIC REPAIRS.
110229 D PRIMROSE ICE $72.00 ICE
110232 PRI14CETON TYPESETTING $29.53 PRINTING
n 110231 PROFESSIONAL PUBLICATIONS IN $5.99 FREIGHT )
THE P a INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O.8-10-88
M 110233 PULSAFELOIN $897.50 PUMP PARTS
Z 114231 PUMP ENGINEERING CO $4.934.47 PUMP PARTS : )
CPROTO-TEL, INC 115R.3% COMPRESSOR PARTS
110236 REGISTRAR PRIOR RESOURCES S99.90 TRAINING
.-1 110237 QUALITY HYDRAULICS 91.025.55 PUMP PARTS )
ENGINEERING SERVICES
3 114239 RECYC INC f1j.5B3.74 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.O. 5-11-88
11421E RED WING SHOES - f715.12 SAFETY SNOBS )
A REED ELECTRIC °f ELECTRIC REPAIRS
OO 1102.2 REMEDY TEMP $9,339.95 TEMPORARY SERVICES
1 I1C213 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO a1.114.05 FITTINGS )�
TRUCKWRECKING f TRUCK REPAIRS
n 110245 RDONET-HUNT CO - 627.94 MACHINE PARTS
r 110246 ROSEMOUNTAURILOC ti 390.53 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES )
r LEGAL SERVICES - BEATRICE HUNT WESSON
C 11021E RYCOK INSTRUMENTS INC $197.27 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS
110249 SANCON ENGINEERING INC f16.155.04 PAINT SUPPLIES �g
• BLUE PRINT to 1 1.00PRINTING 4
110251 MR. 8 MRS. ALBERT B. SCHILLING f 000.00 BASEMENT M.O. 10-10-90
110252 THE SCHOOLER CO f 000.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES , )
�"•� f+nPM OFFICE MACHINES
IA 110254 SEA DYN INC 95.447.00 OCR" MONITORING M�
W 110255 CITY OF SEAL BEACH $139.50 WATER USE �)r
APPLIANCES
110237 SHAMROCK SUPPLY a75.11 TOOLS
11025E SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLI f15.00 PHYSICAL KRAIS .
SOIL TESTING M.O. 6-24-89
110260 SMITH PIPE 6 SUPPLY INC $103.52 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
116261 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP $205.86 TOOLS -�
IIP962 COMPUTBR SOFTWARE
110263 SOFTWARE PUBLISHING CORP iBS.l9 CONFUTER SOFTWARE
110264 SOLAR TURBINES INCORPORATED d#316.42 TURBINE PART )
PERMIT FEE
110266 SOUTH COAST DODGE $11.99 TRUCK PARTS
LIC267 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO N40.196.34 POWER
++r PAR eo CA+ NATURAL GAS
110269 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO f11j191.32 DIESEL FUEL
110270 SOUTHWEST MATERIAL HANDLING 3338.67 - TRUCE PARTS ,)
CD1 )
CkFUND NO 9194 - JT DIST WORKING CAPI7AL PADCESS146 DATE 1//I7/91 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43 )
CLAIMS PAID 10/24/90 POSTING DATE 10/24/90
s
110272 SPARKLE7TS DRINKING WATER $1,417.53 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTAL )
11.11. WELDING SUPPLIES
110273 STAR TOOL b SUPPLY CO f870,06 TOOLS
110274 STERLING ART "G240.6E: AR SU T SUPPLIES CT LANDSCAPING )
l IC276 SUNSET FORD 5109.40 .TRUCK PARTS
y 110277 SUPER CHEW CORP f1.363.B9 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
TOOLS
T 110279 TAYLOR-DUNN MF0 COMPANY '". 291.31 TRUCE PARTS
Z it.... TH EO-TE LLO�BUECN INC fE.296.31
C7 CRANE INSPECTION : )
LAB BUPPLIEB
12112 TRAVEL TRAVEL i19 .50 TRAVEL SERVICES
r--i 11410... TRUCK b AUTOUTO $3
SUPPLY INC f392.BR TRUCK PARTS '
TRUIKUAgr TOOL BOX �Y
110286 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT ;1.f190.00 ANNUAL SERVICE PEE Q3
I10286 THE UN IS OUPCE CORP d'{y32.9A. OPPICE SUPPLIES )
PARCEL SERVICES
CIO 1162BB VATA VAULT USE AFE DEPOSIT CO $1.1 .00 COMPUTER SACK-UP STORAGE
1 11 J2B9 VVR SCIENTIFIC $1.19797.43 LAB BUPPLIEB )I
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
110291 pGSENDWNT/WARE[ DIVISION P927.78 MECHANICAL SUPPLIER
110292 VARIAN INSTRUMENT GROUP S �956.30 LAB SUPPLIES
)�
f— yrgTryqwXyrm-A DATA UPPORT
110294 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $515.62 SAFETY SUPPLIES
110295 VILLAGE NURSERIES f90.50 LANDSCAPING BUPPLIEB )�
WATER11422" SOFTENER
130297 CARL WARREN b CO FSSOG.OD INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR
11029E WATER POLLUTION CONTROL 11390.00 REGISTRATION Fl CAUSTIC
--1 113300 ROURKE f WOODRUFF 939.017.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.6-4-89
CO 110301 XEROX CORP S2.517.09 COPIER LEASES )�
VALVE PARTS
110303 EYERETT H YORK CO 6B1.09 ENGINE PARTS
]1OS09 RICHARD B EDGAR S2D0,JO DEFERRED COMP D28TRIBUTION
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 10/29/90 f2.372.9J7.55
j
J
bo �
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST HORNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/ 19/90 PAGE 7
_ ___ REPORT NIMBEk AP43 _
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY — lp '
CLAIMS PAID 10/24/90 POSTING DATE 10/24/00
:RY _ ._AMOUNT
i1 OPER FUND $121.58
--#1-CAP-FAC FLOD) . - -. _ ASQ2.00
i2 OPER FUND $9,865.01
3> i2 CAP FAC FUND $8,781.22
C0.-p9-.OBER.ETINO_ _.. _— —_..__-.—.111,215.29
m p3 CAP PAC FUND $2,432.63
C p5 OPER FUND t2$4,597.39
p6 OPER FUND $129.30
p6 CAP FAC FUND $668.00
�-#.7-.OPER-FUND. _66.-15P_ak--__
3 47 CAP PAC FUND $2,009.53
p11 OPRE FUND $7,954.66 )qq
3L} • 0 00 623 OPER FUND $8.00
, #23 CRP FAC FUND $13.00 )S
---U34-0RE8_rn.m ___..
D 414 CAP FAC FUND $1,772.51
r p5G6 OPER FUND $1,138.47
7c¢8 nee nnm SIRA-26 F,
p 47 614 OPER
FUND $5,148.881 yyy
JT OPER POND i1,308,083083.9595
A SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FUND $6,943.36
,--, JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $134,683.06
_ ______________ C
--A $2, 07u
(A ..............
- J
- 0 pp4
+ RESOLUTION NO. 90-154
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF FERRIC
CHLORIDE, SPECIFICATION NO. P-122
\..✓ A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND
14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR
PURCHASE OF FERRIC CHLORIDE, SPECIFICATION NO. P-122,
TO IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL CO.
The Boards of Directors of County.Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the
Boards of Directors by the Districts' Purchasing Manager that award of purchase
contract be made to Imperial West Chemical Co. for Purchase of Ferric Chloride,
Specification No. P-122, and the bid tabulation and recommendation, and proposal
submitted for said specification are hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That said purchase contract for Specification No. P-122 be
awarded to Imperial West Chemical Co. at the unit price of $160.11 per dry ton
plus sales tax, furnished and delivered in accordance with the terms and
conditions of said specification and the bid proposal therefor; and,
Section 3: That the Chairman and Secretary of County Sanitation District
No. 1, on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are
hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a purchase contract with
said supplier to supply ferric chloride pursuant to the specifications and
purchase contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel ;
and,
Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby
rejected. _
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 14, 1990.
"C-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(b) - ALL DISTRICTS 11C-1"
COUNTY SAMTA'm Dimas
October 3, 1990 of ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA '
lines eus avenue
yEgE.=pg ppg Pa BOX 8197
Po WMNVAMY.MUWMA92T ')
IllelB&t-0etl
TO: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
FROM: Katherine Yarosh, Buyer _
RE: PURCHASE OF FERRIC CHLORIDE, SPECIFICATION NO P-122
Sealed bids were opened Tuesday, October 2, 1990 for the
purchase and delivery of Ferric Chloride for a one year period
beginning December 1, 1990.
Tabulation of Bids as follows:
Vendor Cost Per Dry Ton
1. Imperial West Chemical Co. $160.11
Antioch, CA
2. Chemwest Industries 164.09
San Francisco, CA
3. Great Western Chemical 287.22
Santa Fe Springs, CA
4. Eaglebrook, Inc. NO BID
Schererville, IN
5. Ashland Chemical Co. NO BID
Santa Fe Springs, CA
6. Commerce Chemical Co. NO BID
City of Industry, CA
7. Western States Chemical Supply Corp. NO BID
Orange, CA
It is recommended the award be made to Imperial West Chemical
Co. , the lowest bidder, for a one year contract period, starting
December 1, 1990. The total estimated annual cost of $1,320,907.50,
plus applicable sales tax, is based on furnishing 8,25G. tons, at a unit
price of $160.11 per dry ton. The new bid price is lower than the
existing contract with Imperial Chemical Co. by $73 .79 per dry ton.
Provisions are in the specifications for a one year contract extension.
Respectfully submitted:
�0. LAJUlYL1U OJY &S
Katherine Yarosh,
Buyer
"C-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-2"
�.r
We hereby concur with the foregoing recommendation:
Ted Hof fm n
Purchasing Xqhager ( /
ry G/ treed,
direc of Finance
Robert Ooten,
Assistant Superintendent, Operations
ICY:by
cc:Rita Brown, Boards Secretary
"C-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Three (3)
CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE November 14. 1990
JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO, J-17
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 18,709.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item I - SUBSTITUTION OF ROOF AND OVERFLOW DRAINS
The Contractor was directed to change the roof and overflow drains from ASS type
as shown on the construction drawings to cast iron Zurn type (Model No. 2-100
REC) per RFI Nos. 90 and 133. The design consultant recommended the change
because this roof is supported by a metal deck covered with a light weight
insulating type concrete and ASS drains cannot be used in this type of roof
system. There are a total of 11 drains and 11 overflows. This item of work was
negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions.
(Reference: RFI's 90 and 133, OCSD letter dated September 18, 1990, and FCO 6)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 10,635.00.
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 - OFFSITE CHILLER SERVICE AND RETURN LINE SPACERS WITH INSULATION
INSIDE THE CONDUIT
The Contractor was directed to install insulating spacers on the 4-inch cold
water service line to prevent the line from coming in contact with the cold
water return line and to insulate the inside of the conduit during the
construction of the offsite chiller lines to the Control Center. The pipe
insulation had to be trimmed to jack the pipes through this conduit. This item
of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section
10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 7)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,830.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: _ 0 Calendar Days
"D-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-1"
Y 1
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 4
P. O- BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Three (3)
CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE November 14. 1990
JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY. JOB NO. J-17
Item 3 - REPAIRS TO BROKEN WATER LINE, INSTALLATION OF GATE VALVE AND
CONSTRUCTION OF CONCRETE ANCHOR BLOCK
The Contractor was directed to repair a ruptured water line broken while
excavating for the offsite chiller pipe. The line was a stub from a tee and was
not shown on the drawings. The Contractor was directed to remove the saturated
soil and install a 6-inch gate valve and anchor block in the line. This work
was necessary in order to stop the flooding caused by the broken water line.
This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to
Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 9,775.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 4 - REDUCE HEIGHT OF DOOR 62 AND ADDITION OF HARDWARE TO DOORS 3 AND 8
The Contractor was directed to reduce the height of Door 62 to 7 feet because
the 8-feet 10-inches-high door would be too high for the hallway to work
properly. The Contractor was also directed to change the butts on Doors 3 and 8
(each 8 feet 10 inches high) from standard weight to heavy duty weight per the
underwriter's hinge requirements. This affected 16, butts. This item of work
was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions.
(Reference: RFI 125 and 129 FCO 9)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 955.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 5 - MODIFICATIONS TO EVAPORATING COOLING SYSTEM
The Contractor was directed to delete the indirect evaporating cooling system,
provide a lockout of the direct evaporating cooling units and an override of the
evaporating cooling lockout from the humidification control and reduce all
8-inch chilled water piping to 6-inch. This was a direct result from the plan to
hook this building up with the Central Generation facilities for heating and
cooling. Providing these changes will utilize the energy savings realized from
the Central Generation plant. This item was negotiated pursuant to Section
10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: OCSD letter dated
August 28, 1990 and FCO 11)
DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($ 30,124.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"D-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Three (31
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE November 14. 1990
JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY. JOB NO. J-17
ITEM 6 - EXTEND OFFSITE CHILLER PIPE INTO ROOM 104
The Contractor was directed to extend the offsite chiller pipe from its terminus
northeast of the building into Room 104. This resulted from the future plan to
have this building served for heating and cooling from the Central Chiller
Building. This work is required in order to complete the link of the offsite
chiller pipe into this building. This item of the work was negotiated pursuant
to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: Plan Change
No. 6 and FCO 12)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 28,859.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 7 - MODIFICATIONS TO OFFSITE EDISON LINE
The Contractor was directed to construct the offsite Edison line so that the
line could easily be extended to the new Control Center planned for the south
side of the North Perimeter Road. This was necessary for the overall good
planning for the entire plant facilities. This item of work was negotiated with
the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions.
(Reference: PCH 3, revised OCSD letter of September 27, 1990, and FCO 15)
DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($ 3,221.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 18,709.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental
to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any
extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change
Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this
Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs,
expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except
as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order.
"D-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-3"
r
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Three (3)
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE November 14, 1990
JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date March 1, 1990
Original Contract Time 420 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date April 24, 1991
Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 7 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 427 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date May 1, 1991
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 7,090,000.00
Prev.Auth. Changes $ 80,254.31
This Change (Add) (Oedust) $ 18,709.00
Amended Contract Price $ 7,188,963.31
Board Authorization Date: November 14, 1990
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
SUBMITTED BY: REC DED BY:
Engineer Dat Co truction Manager Date
APP V D BY: Q AP VED AS TO F I:
�/YI1Qa
Dir c or of Engineering Date General CoCou sel . Date
J. R. L ROBERTS CORPORATIOON
D / p
AC (tiM1vW{'I
Cont actoCr./ D to
"D-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-4"
CODNIY CANITATICN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNW Page 1 of 4
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 Ell AVENUE
ECUMMAIN VALLEY, CALIFURTLIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. Four (4)
CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH & ALPER DATE Novenber 14. 1990
JOB: GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION P= NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-1
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 37,916.00
In accordance with contract prxerisiona, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are herby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additives to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 - EXPANSION JOINT REPAIRS AT InmRSECTION F
The proposed Tunnel 4 ties into the existing Tunnel Intersection F with an
expansion joint. The excavation of the existing Intersection F revealed that
the face of the existing concrete had rebar dowels at the posed expansion
joint location. Dowels were also discovered in the existing tunnel deck when
Ong 'may Plug was removed. The Contractor was instructed to remove the
dowels since they cannot be used at expansion joints. The dowels were cut off
one inch behind the face of concrete and then the face of the concrete was
repaired with epoxy grout. This item of work was aoccq)L shed by Contractor's
force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions.
(Reference ECO 5)
ADDED COST IBIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,028.00
TTME EXPANSION TRIS CMM ORDER PPEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 - BORING AMID CASING UNDER EAST PRauIAF:ER ROAD FOR EIBC :ICAL MANHOLE
DRAIN
The Contractor was directed to bore under the East Perimeter Road and place a
4-inch PVC pipe sleeve. The pipe sleeve was needed for the installation of the
2-inch drain for Electrical Manhole 4-25 (shown on 1Y04) . The drawings show
Installing the drain in an existing pipe sleeve adjacent to an electrical duct
bank. The existing sleeve maid not be located by potholing operations. This
item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force amount pursuant to Section
10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 7)
ADDED COST THIS C ME ORDER ITEM: $ 2,365.00
TIME EOCLENSIOI THIS CHANGE ORDER rl'IIii: 0 Calendar Days
"E-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-1"
C0NTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 4
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ETT AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, allJFMUEA 92708
ORANGE ORDER
CX. NO. Farr (4)
CMIRACTOR: ZIEBARTH 6 ALPER DATE November 14. 1990
J08: GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB No. P1-34-1
Item 3 - DEMOIITICN OF UNDTSCWST?n CITE 0BSTRUCTION AT CITY WATER
PUMP STATION
This item is for the demolition andremmval of an undisclosed concrete slab
uncovered during the excavation for the 10-inch city crater feed shown just north
of the City Water Pump Station on Plan Sheet 1Y04. This item of work was
accompli.shed by Contractor's force ac=nrt pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of
the General. Provisions. (Reference: ECO 8)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 689.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CBANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 4 - HOT WATER PIPM REVISIT
The piping for the hot water system shown on Plan Sheets 1Y22, 1Y24, 1Y25, 1Y27,
1Y28, Q101 and 6M04 is called out to be six inches in diameter, A Brown and
Caldwell Engineer's study of the hat water loop at Plant No. 1 rrrormended that
this pipe should be increased to eight inches in diameter. The 8-inch pipe is
required to increase the capacity of the proposed system to cool the Central
Generation engines and heat all future digesters. The added cost for this item
includes cost for restocking the 6-inch pipe already delivered to the jobsite,
added cost for purchasing and installing the 8-inch pipe, and also added cost
for insulating the 8-inch pipe. This item of work was negotiated with the
Contractor 'pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions.
(Reference: PCH 014)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 31,509.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS ORANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 5 - GAS cY dW-SSCR BUILDING EQUIPI-1ENT DRAM
This item is for the addition of equipment drain fittings, per Detail 440, to
three equipment drain lines shown on Section E on Plan Sheet 6M01 of the
contract plans. These drain Lines are shown without the fittings which are
normally required for this service. This item of work was negotiated with the
Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions.
(Reference: PCH 019)
ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER Iffid: $ 1,325.00
TIME E7C E SIDN THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calez a Days
"E-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 PET.Tc AVENUE t
EOUNTAM VALLEY, (`nT.T MENIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. Four (4)
CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH 6 ALPER DATE November 14, 1990
JOB: CAS FACI*.TTIpc AT RECIAMMON PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-34-1
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER: $ 37,916.00
TOTAL TINE EXTENSICN THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and acry extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required
for this Change order, and no direct or indirect,. incidental or consequential
costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor,
except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order.
SUMIMM OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date February 27, 1990
Original Contract Tim 730 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date February 26, 1992
Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Time Extension 0 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 730 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date February 26, 1992
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 13,098,000.00
Prey. Auth. Changes $ 98.001.00
This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 37,916.00
Amended Contract Price $ 13.233.917.00
"E-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-3"
COUNTY SA*TT'^ TION DISTRICTS OF CRANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 RT.TR AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, allaKRNTA 92708
CHANGE OADffi2
C.O. NO. Ebur (4)
CONTRPC : ZIEAARPR S ALPER DATE November 14. 1990
JOB: GAS BANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMMCN PIANP NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-1
Board Authorization Date: November 14, 1990
COUNTY SANTTATICN DISTRICTS OF
amm COUNTY, CALIFO mm
SUBMITTED BY: R90014MEED BY:
�0-A A0 '�&- to-ryo
Enid Date Cam' Manager Date
APPR OM AS TO EOPM:
o
n++ectcr-of Encp*+sar+g Date General Cbunsel Date
ZIIE SAR H 6 ALPER
ADCEPIBD BY:
Cmdzaabcr Date
"E-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS -E-4-
COEMW SANITnMON DIMUC1S CF CRANGE COMM Page 1 of 9
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 &[S IS AVENUE
FOMWLM VALLEY, =ZFCmUA 92708
CHANCE ORDER
C. O. NO. Ten (10)
CONIRACXR: ZIEBAR'TE 6 ALPER DATE November 14, 1990
JCB: M2S(ELSANECUS NODIFICATICM AND IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILu'= AT TREATMENT
PIANP NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-37
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Da3iu t) $ 108,939.00
In axordance with contract provisions, the fallowing changes in the contract
and/or contrast wok axe hereby authorized and as ocape1,sation therefor, the
following additions to or a3arl=tirma from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 - FOUL AIR DDCTWORR CHANGES AT HEMMOM "C"
The drive section of new grit screw conveyor No. 1 is located at the interior of
Headsorks "C" over the grit hopper roan. Existing stainless steel foul air
ductwork that serviced the grit hopper room interfered with the new grit screw
conveyor drive. The interfering portions of the stainless steel ductwork were
removed during the grit screw conveyor installation. Consideration was given to
eliminating the interfering ductwork. The absence of the duct work, however,
created a safety problem in the grit hopper room as the fail air emitted by the
grit handling process was not being removed. To maintain a safe working
environment in the hopper ram and eliminate the interference at the conveyor
drive, the Contractor was instructed to furnish and install new stainless steel
ductwork and route sane around the new conveyor drive section. The cost of this
extra work item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section
10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE CRDER r=: $ 7,883.00
ME MEMNiICN THIS CHANGE CRDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 - GRIT HOPPER ROM SEAM STRUCTURE AND WBMAT Y RIMILACD=
The plans for the P2-37 project provided for the installation of a new floor
drain and drain piping in the existing hopper room. The plans also provided for
the demolition of the floor in the room to accomplish the new drain work. The
plans did not, however, show the existing raised ,wallaay around the room or the
concrete stair structure, both of which had to be dsmolished along with the
existing floor to acconplish the new drain work. This change order item
provides for the additional demolition work to remove the raised walkAmy and
stair structure and for the re-construction of same after the new floor drain
system was installed. This item of work was performed by Contractor's force
account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER rTEM: $ 4,464.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CE794M ORDER MEN: 0 Calendar Days
"F-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-1"
070NTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 9
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 Rf.1.TC AVENIDE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA1=URN A 92708
CHANGE ORDER
\/
C. O. N0. Ten (10)
CONTRACTOR: ZIEBAATH S ALPER DATE November 14, 1990
JOB: hDDIF'ICATICNS AMID IbTR(7.194ENT5 TO FACILITIES AT TREATMENT
PLANT NO. 2, JOB AU. P2-37
Item 3 - ADDITIONAL ELECTRICAL TESTING - RAW SEMM PMER BUILDING
In addition to the electrical testing required for new equiiprent in the Raw
Sewage Power Building, the Districts required the Contractor to perform
electrical tests ca the new transformer/substation. Testing of this electrical
equipment was not addressed in the project specifications. This change order
item provides for electrical testing as stated above and performed in accordance
with the requirements of the National Elecrtr;cal Testing Association (WIN).
Work was performed by Contractor's force acaamt pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B
of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER MEN: $ 881.00
TINE EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 4 - HANDRAIL IITRO/E+1EM - Y047 M WALKWAYS AT BARSCREENS
Removable walkmys with handrails instal-led at the roof level of the hararrvens
were fabricated with "Gripstrut", a Patented preformed wallway, according to
details provided by the Districts. Handrails fastened to the vertical side
rails of the preformed walkway deflected when leaned on by OCSD personnel during
maintenance work on the barscreen drives. This change order item provides for
the installation of stiffeners between the side rails of the walkways at each
handrail mount location to support the hanrira;l and prevent Same from
deflecting. Cost of this item of work was negot ted with Contractor pursuant
to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,450.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 5 - DELETION OF SECCNDARY C ARTFTF.Ii EPFTAENT METER
Details for the installation of the new secondary clarifier effluent sampler at
the southwest corner of the secondary clarifiers located the new sample pump in
the roadway. To relocate the sample pump to a safe position out of the roadway,
a change order would be required. A review of this item by staff, in light of
the added change order, future contract work, ales the condition of the existing
sampler system, determined that the installation should be deleted. This item
of deleted work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section
10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions.
DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (4,096.00)
�►� TIME P ION THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: - 0 Calendar Days
"F-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(e)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "F.2"
OM M SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE OIXARY Page 3 of 9
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 RTT•TR AVENGE
F[ DMUN VALLEY, CAIJFCRNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Ten (10)
CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH & ALPER DATE November 14. 1990
JOB: MISCECIANEOU4 h10DIFICATIONS AND IITROVENRNTS TO FACIIXTIES AT TREATMENT
PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-37
Item 6 - SnUW SIGNAIS FOR SCREW CONVEYORS, nr7r CMWEYOR AND BARSCREEN
OPERATION
Wiring details for the new screw conveyors, belt conveyor, and barscceens did
not include provisions for the connection of status lights for said new
equipment. This change order item provides for the installation of additional
wiring for status signal operation, Work Was performed by Contractor's force
account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER TIE+I: $ 1,346.00
TIME IDCffidSION THIS CHANGE ORDER Maf: 0 Calendar Days
Item 7 - CLASSIFIER DRAIN 17T
The existing 6-inch drain for grit classifier No. 1 Was plugged and could
not be made serviceable by Districts personnel. Whenever the screw conveyor in
grit classifier No. 1 had to be serviced or repaired the classifier had to be
pumped out using a vacuum truck. During the installation of new grit screw
conveyor No. 1, the classifier was drained, cleaned and was to be out of service
for a prolonged period of time. Staff determined that it would be in the
Districts' interest to install a new drain system for grit classifier No. 1 at
this time. This change order item provides for the excavation and shoring Work
required to remove the existing 6-inch drain for classifier No. 1 and for the
installation of a new 10-inch drain system. This work was performed by
Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)H of the General
Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: $ 15,861.00
TIME EIIMION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 15 Calendar Days
Item 8 - CHANCE LOCATION OF SCREENING BIN FLOM RAIIS
Two stainless steel rails were provided per contract for installati(n1 at the new
screening conveyor facility to provide a level surface for rolling screenings
collection bins. The floor rails also served as guides to position the rolling
bins in the proper location under the screening conveyor. The floor in the
conveyor ram was sloped to provide drainage. To provide a means to level the
floor rails, support legs of varying lengths Were welded to the rails and Were
anchored to the floor. The original position selected for the rail installation
would have allowed the screenings bin to hit the overhead door jamb. To prevent
"F-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(e)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-3"
COUNTY CnnIPTMCN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 9
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
POUl71'AIN VALLEY, CALIEM11A 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. Ten (10)
CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH 6 ALPER DATE November 14, 1990
JOB: 141SCELIANHOf1.5 NODIPTCATIONS AM IMPROVEM NTS TO FACILITIES AT TREATMENT
PIANT NO. 2, JOB N0. P2-37
damage to the stuccoed door jamb and overhead door guide the position of the
floor rails was changed. The change in rail location resulted in the need to
modify all support legs to conform to the floor to rail dimension at the new
rail location. Work was performed by Contractor's force account pursuant to
Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,813.00
TB E EXTENSION THIS CHANGE CRIER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Itemm 9 - ADDITIONAL COATING - HEA04ORKS "C" GRIT SCREW CONVEYORS
The three new screw, conveyors were furnished according to the plans and
specifications and shipped to the job site as assembled units. Prior to
installation of the units staff inspected them and found the coatings system to
be inadequate, although the units were coated according to the specifications.
The interior of each trough assembly should have been coal tar epoxy coated;
specifications called for trough exterior only to be coated. The screw conveyor
flights should have been coated with coal tar epoxy; specifications did not
address or call for flights to be coated. Supplier furnished standard factory
finish on flights. -Although the three grit screw conveyors met the Limited
coatings requirements called for in the specifications, coal tar epoxy would
have to be applied to the interior of the three trough assemblies. In order to
coat the troughs and flights with the required 40 mils of coal tar all three
conveyor assemblies had to be dismantled to allow for sandblasting and applying
coal tar epoxy to each unit of fabrication. This change order item provides for
sandblasting and coating of appropriate fabrications and for the installation of
gaskets in each trough joint. Work was performed by Contractor's force account
pursuant to SeaUcii 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 24,946.00
TINE EXTENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 25 Calendar Days
Item 10 - USE OF TEMPORARY BELT CONVEYOR DURING REPLACEMENT OF GRIT SCREW
CONVEYORS 1 AND 2
There are three screw conveyors utilized in the handling of grit at the two grit
classifiers located south of Headworks "C". Grit screw, conveyor No. 1 carries
grit from classifier No. 1 directly to the grit hopper room. Grit screw conveyor
No. 3 carries grit from classifier No. 2. Number 2 conveyor discharges grit
`...� collected from No. 3 grit screw, to a grit hauling vehicle or to grit screw No. 1.
"F-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-4"
CC= SANr=CN DISTRICTS OF CRATE COUNW Page 5 of 9
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 Ell AVENUE
POMMIN VALLEY, CALL ENE 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Ten C101
CalnZA=: ZIEBAHIR & ALPER DATE November 14, 1990
JOB: hIISCELIANEOUS MDMCATIONS AND n4 ROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT TRP.AMEM
PLANH NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-37
The specified sequence for the replacement of the three existing grit screws
required the Contractor to remove grit screws No. 1 and M. 2 and leave
remaining grit screw No. 3 in operation for the duration of the No. 1 and No. 2
grit screw work. This first phase of the grit screw replacement would shut down
the grit hopper roam for floor drain replacement and rely on grit screw conveyor
No. 3 to carry all grit collected to a grit hauling vehicle. The specifications
did not, however, consider that grit screw conveyor No. 3 was too short to reach
the grit kk"ping vehicle and was teo low to add a chute to extend the conveyor.
To overcome this inconsistency in the plans the Contractor was instructed to
provide a temporary belt conveyor to carry grit fram grit screw No. 3 to the
grit hauling vehicle. Work was performed by a Contractor's forte account
pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE CRDM PIEM: $ 5,882.00
TIM E1C'nWICN THIS CHANGE CRT)ER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 11 - SdRX1%nM CHANGES TO NEW CONVEYCR B=nr.
The design of the new Conveyor ta,i7di included consideration for existing foul
air ductwork passing over the new building and for existing primary influent
distribution piping passing under the new building. The actual location of the
existing 36-inch by 72-inch foul air ductwork placed it within the upper portion
of the new building at roof level. The top of the existing 84-itch primary
influent distribution line interfered with the construction of new foundations
for the building.
To overcome the interference between the existing ductwork and the new roof the
roof elevation was increased to maximum allowable height and the roof framing
details were modi_fierl to allow for the existing ductwork. As the fiberglass
ductwork would now pass through the masonry walls of the building instead of
over the roof of the building, channel iron wall sleeves were installed
requiring the details for wall reinforcing steel to be changed. As the roof
elevation changed the details for roof flashing had to be changed.
To eliminate the interference between the existing underground 84-inch primary
influent distribution line and the new foundation, the foundation was
redesigned. This change order item provides for changes outlined above to
overcome ixconsistences in the original building design. Work was performed
by Corttr-actor's forte accamt pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General
Provisions.
ADM) COST MIS CHANGE CADER ITEM: $ 26,835.00
TIME EXTENSICN THIS CHANM CRIM r M: 60 Calendar Days
"F-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-5"
COLWY SANTIMO.0 D317T RIOTS OF CHANGE COUNTY Page 6 of 9
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 Er-T AVENUE
FOC NDUN VALTEY, C21L1»UTA 92708
CHANCE ORDER
C. O. NO. Ten (10 1
CONTRACTOR: 2IEBARTH S ALPER DATE November 14, 1990
JOB: MISCEIdA M S NDDIFICATIOiS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO FAC=71Ea AT TREATMENT
PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-37
Item 12 - DELETE FOOL AIR AND SUPPLY AIR U. ]CTW0RR AT NEW CONVEYOR HU11DING
Plans for the new Conveyor Building included a system of foul air ductwork and a
system of supply air ductwork to edition the atmosphere within the new facility.
After the building was completed and closed-in, and prior to the installation of
the two duct systems, an odor study was made at the conveyor facility to review
the foul air removal and fresh air supply requirements. It was determined from
the results of the study that only a minimum quan+ity of fresh air bad to be
supplied to the facility. The fresh air supply system was reduced and the foul
air system was deleted. This change order item was negotiated with the
Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions.
ANDUNP OF CREDIT IBIS CHANGE ORDER MEM: $ (21,506.00)
TIME E7TENSIOJ TEIS CBANGE CRUER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 13 - MDIFICPMC S TO MIIOR.AND POMP BASES - MAIN SE MM PumPS 2 AND 4
Plans for the installation of new 36-inch main sewage pumps (ASP) 2 and 4
indicated that the existing pump suction piping was 36-inch. When the existing
pumps were removed the existing suction connection waa found to be-actually
30 inches in diameter. The concrete embedded suction fittings were 36-inch by
30-inch reducers that had to be removed and replaced with new 36-inch suction
fittings. In the case of ASP 2, the concrete encased suction elbow was not
level and the new 36-inch suction fitting had to be machined to correct the
out-of-level condition. As a portion of each of the existing 30-inch by 36-inch
suction fitting was embedded in the pump base concrete it was necessary to
demolish the existing pump bases to gain access to the flange bolts at the lase
of the existing suction fittings.
The original drive shafts for ASP 2 and 4 were of the two-section,"D-joint"
type, having a support bearing at mid length of shaft, and the support hearing
mounted to an opening in the mezzanine floor. The new drive shafts were a
single unit without a center support hearing. The concrete floor at the
mezzanine level interfered with the alignment of the new single unit shaft and
had to be cut back and patched.
The new reinforced concrete MP motor bases were to be constructed over the
existing motor bases, the intent being the elimination of demolishing the
existing bases. The existing horizontal I+SP drive motors were different in
base configuration than the new vertical ASP drive units. The existing ASP
motor base extended beyond the limits of the new ASP motor base and was in
deteriorated edition. Therefore, the existing motor bases had to be
demolished and the floor patched.
F-6" AGENDA ITEM #9(e)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-6"
COUNTY SANPPATICN DISTRICTS OF 0RANGE COUNTY Page 7 of 9
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLLS AVENUE
FUMMLIN VALLEY, 011MERKM 92706
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Ten (101
CONTRACT0R: ZIERARTH & ALPER DATE Navemtx:r 14. 1990
JOB: NHSCELIANEDU5 MODIFICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT TREAmmnm
PIAW NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-37
This change order item provides for the demolition and re-construction of
reinforced concrete main sewage pump bases, the removal., replacement and
machining of 36-inch main sewage pimp auction fittings, the modification of the
mezzanine level floor to clear the new pimp drive shaft and for the removal of
the two existing NSP drive motor bases. Cost of this change order item was
negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General
Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE 0RDER ITEM: $ 32,821.00
ME ELISION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 28 Calendar Days
Item 14 - CHANGE IN STRUCTURAL STEEL C0AM G SYSTEM - CONVEYOR BUIIJDING ROOF
The coating system specified for the interior of the new roof decking and
structural steel roof framing is alkyd enamel. Due to the anticipation of a
corrosive moisture laden environment developing in the Conveyor Building the
detailed specification for the new steel roof deck was to be fabricated with
galvanized steel and be coated with a corrosion resistant epoxy material. The
structural steel roof framing and the support for the coated steel roof decking
were to be exposed to the same envimrment. Staff reccumanded that the
structural steel be sandblasted and coated with the same corrosion resistant
epoxy material applied to the new roof deck instead of the alkyd enamel. Cost
of this change order item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section
10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,989.00
T.INJE EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 15 - DELAY IN BARSCREEN INSuar.ramrOU
During the installation of the new harscreens at Headworku; "C" the Contractor
was directed to stop work at the barm� area to allow the Districts' work
farce to repair a chlorine solution line that failed. This change order item
reimburses the Contractor for the additional costs experienced by him during the
standby period. Cost of this change order item was negotiated with the
Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER Imo; $ 510.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CEANGE ORDER rTEM: 0 Calendar Days
7-7" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-7"
COMIY SANr=CN DISiRIC1S OF CHANGE CO= Page 8 of 9
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 WT.TS AVENGE
EO@ITAIN VALTM, GALIEaoaA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Ten (101
CCNIRACIUR: ZIE&1HIR S ALPER DATE November 14, 1990
JOB: MISCEUANEOUS WDIFICATIONS AND 1ITROVED=S TO FACILITIES AT TREATMENP
PLANP NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-37
Item 16 - REPAIR OF DISIRICPS-EWUSHED BARSCRIMNS
The Districts pre-pucbased the five new bra-.r e.,a for installation at
admork—n "C" by the P2-37 Contractor. During the period prior to the start of
the P2-37 contract portions of two barscxeens were damaged by vehicles driven by
an un)a v party. This change ordeL item provides for the repair of the damaged
portions of two twrscree., units. The cost of this extra work item was
negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General
Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 860.00
TIME EXBENSICN THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHAIM ORDER: $ 108,939.00
TOM T7M EXTENSICN THIS CHANGE ORDER: 128 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 128-days, extension
of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no
direct or indirect, incidental or ocnse uen iwl costs, expenses, losses Or
damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted
and approved by this Change Order.
SUb ARY OF DIGESTER Mi7.pSminm TINE
Original Activity Start Date November 2, 1988
Original Activity Duration 300 Calendar Days
Original Activity Ccupletion Date August 28, 1989
Adjustment Milestone Time This Change Order 0 Calendar Days
Total Adjustment Milestone Time 6 Calendar Days
Revised Activity Duration 306 Calendar Days
Revised Milestone Date Septmd)er 3, 1989
"F-8" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-8"
COONTY SANr=CN DL9MCTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 9 of 9
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 HULLS AVENUE
PNANTAIN VALLEY, CALLIORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORCER
C. O. NO. Ten (10)
CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH & ALPER DATE November 14, 1990
JOB: MISCELLANEOUS MMIFTCATTONS AND INPROVEMEN15 TO FArILTTIES AT TREP.4'=
PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-37
S@2MRY OF CONTRACT TINE
Original Contract Date November 2, 1988
Original Contract Time 425 C&Iandar Days
Original Completion Date December 31, 1989
Time Extension this C.O. 128 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 257 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 682 Calendar Lays
Revised Final Completion Due Date September 14, 1990
Actual Final Completion Late September 14, 1990
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 5,395,000.00
Prev. Guth. Changes $ 494,017.29
This Change (Add) (D ) $ 108,939.00
Amended Contract Price $ 5,997,956.29
Hoard Authorization Date: November 14, 1990
COMM SANIM mrON DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CAdXMRT0l
Samrro HY:/ d �Il1LD BY:
G �l f0 eo la-B-
eer Late clop Manager Date
A ID By.
APPRd VEp AS TO FOW:
/ /'
c
Director of Engineering 'Date General Counsel. Date.
ZIEBARffi & ALPER
ACCEPTED BY:
Con Date
"F-9" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) ( 1) ALL DISTRICTS "F-9"
RESOLUTION NO. 90-155
ACCEPTING JOB NO. P2-37 AS COMPLETE
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
ACCEPTING MISCELLANEOUS MODIFICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS
TO FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-37,
AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, Ziebarth 8 Alper, has completed the
construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Miscellaneous
Modifications and Improvements to Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-37, on August 10, 1990; and,
Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Director of Engineering has
recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the
terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered
filed; and,
Section 3. That Miscellaneous Modifications and Improvements to Facilities
at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-37, is hereby accepted as completed in
accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated November 2, 1988; and,
Section 4. That the Districts' Director of Engineering is hereby
authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Ziebarth 8 Alper,
setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Miscellaneous
Modifications and Improvements to Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-37, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General
Counsel ; and,
"G-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(e)(2) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-1"
Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting fot
itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 14, 1990.
"G-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(e)(2) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-2"
C>;R M SANi=CN DISTRICTS OF CHANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 2
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 RILT AVENUE
FOUNULD1 VALLEY, CALIFORNTA 92708
CHANGE CRDER
C. 0. NO. One (11
CONTRACTOR: Schuler EYuaineermcr Corporation DATE November 14, 1990
JOB: FUEL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1, SPECIFICATION NO. R-033-1 (REEMI;
FOE[. SYSTEM IIWROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 2, SPECIFICATION NO. R-033-2 (MM)
nUTHIEIENIATION II4PROVEMM AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-40 (REM)
NASTEBALII.ER SAFIPLMG SYSTEM, AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-27-1; AND,
pmarm; UMER FM4P STATION AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-27-2.
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Dedne6) $ 23,954.00
In accordance with contract *pz�, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract wvdc are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or dFwb=t m from the contract price are hereby approved.
Job No. P1-27-2
Item 1 - STRUCTURAL-CHANGES FOR PW STATION DUE TO CHANGES IN SOIL CONDITIONS
During excavation for the pump station, the Contractor encountered poor soil
conditions. The design of the structure, a part of the contract required thicker
invert and walls than shown in the contract documents. This change provided for
additional concrete and reinforcing steel over and above that shown on the
original contract plans. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account
pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED C06T THIS CHANGE ORDER =: $ 23,954.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 45 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED CST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 23,954.00
TOTAL TIME EXTECNSIOI THIS CHANGE ORDER: 45 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prise work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 45 days' extension
of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no
direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or
damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted
and approved by this Change Order.
"H-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-1"
CMMY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF CRANGE COMM Page 2 of 2
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 FRT.TA AVENGE
FOUNTAIN VALTBY, CAL1FnUM 92708
CHANGE ORDER �ao�
C. 0. NO. One (1)
IX NTRACIOR: Schuler Encineerina Corporation DATE November 14, 1990
JOB: FUEL SYSTEM IME)FOVEME M AT PLANT NO. 1, SPECIFICATION NO. R-033-1 (REBID1;
FOE). SYSTEM II+IPX%)VFS'I US AT PTANT NO. 2, SPECIFICATION NO. R-033-2 (REBID);
n0nUMENTATION IML� AT PTANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-40 (REBID);
F� SAI PTIING SYSTEM AT PTANr NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-27-1; AND,
PAASrEMAIII,ER PUMP STATION AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-27-2.
SUMMPM CF Ocmn LT T.Ihffi
Original Contract Date November 29, 1989
Original Contract Time 240 Calendar Days
Original Ccmpletum Date July 26, 1990
Time Extension this C.O. 45 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 45 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 285 Calendar Days
Revised Final. Completion Due Date September 9, 1990
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 1,622,447.00
Prev. Ruth. Changes $ 0.00
This Change (Add) (dam) $ 23,954.00
Amer Contract Price $ 1,646,401.00
Board Authorization Date: November 14, 1990
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
MANM COMTY, CALUIMU A
BY: U
4/11
Er. Date donst=tion Manager Date
Al APPROVED AS 1O FL)HM: , /
Director of E T; eer ng ' Date General Counsel
SCBULSR ==umRING 03RPCRATICN
BY:
Date
"H-2° AGENDA ITEM #9(f) — ALL DISTRICTS "H-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
�j
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O.BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 9272E-0127
10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
(71 )92'2611
�ll.{II FA%ptq 902-0358
October 24, 1990
Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County, California
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018
Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum No. 1 to the Professional
Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers in Connection with
Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36, and
Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42
In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional
engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee
for Addendum No. 1 to the agreement with John Carollo Engineers for additional
design and services for Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No.
P1-36, and Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42, on an
hourly-rate basis including labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, and fixed
profit, in an amount not to exceed $180,232.00.
Existing Change Per Amended
Agreement Addn. No. 1 Agreement
Engineering Services, (hourly
rates including labor plus
overhead at 155%),
not to exceed $4,313,341 $160,921 $4,474,262
Direct Expenses, not to exceed 180,000 0 180,000
Fixed Profit 504,500 19,311 523.811
TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed 4,997,841 $180,232 $52178,073
The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee
as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not
result in excessive profits for the consultant.
/s/A. B. Catlin /s/William Mahoney
A. B. Catlin William Mahoney
Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman
Selection Committee Selection Committee
Qomas M. Dawes
Thomas M. Dawes
Director of Engineering
Selection Committee
"I" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "I"
RESOLUTION NO. 90-156 '
APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN
OF JOB NOS. P1-36 AND P2-42
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN OF SECONDARY
TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-36,
AND SECONDARY TREATMENT EXPANSION AT PLANT NO. 2,
JOB NO. P2-42, PROVIDING FOR ADDITIONAL DESIGN SERVICES
TO REPLACE AND REALIGN EXISTING 78-INCH OCEAN OUTFALL
AND MODIFY EXISTING SCUM COLLECTION SYSTEM
WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with John
Carollo Engineers for design and construction services, preparation of
operations and maintenance manuals, and training services required relative to
Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. PI-36, and Secondary
Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42; and,
WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to amend the agreement with John
Carollo Engineers to provide for additional design services to replace and
realign existing 78-inch ocean outfall and modify existing scum collection
system; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of Directors on October 10,
1990, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has
certified the final negotiated fee for said services.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Addendum No. 1 dated November 14, 1990, to that certain
Professional Services Agreement dated October 11, 1989, by and between County
Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2,
"J 1" AGENDA IT`M tJ9(9) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-1"
:3; S. 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and John Caroilo Engineers, for design and
construction services, preparation of operations and maintenance manuals, and
training services required relative to Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant
No. 1, Job No. P1-36, and Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-42, providing for additional design services to replace and realign
existing 78-inch ocean outfall and modify existing scum collection system, is
hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased by an amount
not to exceed $180,232.00, as follows, which increases the total authorized
compensation from $4,997,841.00 to an amount not to exceed $5,178,073.00:
Existing Change per Amended
Agreement Addendum No. 1 Agreement
Professional Services
(hourly rates for labor
plus overhead at 155%),
not to exceed ............. $4,313,341.00 $160,921.00 $4,474,262.00
Direct Expenses,
not to exceed ............... 180,000.00 -0- 180,000.00
Fixed Profit ................. 504,500.00 19,311.00 523,811.00
TOTAL AUTHORIZED
COMPENSATION..............$4,997,841.00 $180,232.00 $5,178,073.00
Section' 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for
itself and on behalf of District Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. I in form approved by the
General Counsel .
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 14, 1990.
"J-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O.8OX$127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 9272"127
°�xra.LyuN 10804 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92709-7019
p14)992-2411 �
October 24, 1990
Board of Directors -
County Sanitation Districts
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018
Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Engineering
Services in Connection with Marine Ecosystem
Evaluations.
In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of
professional services, the Selection Committee met on October 24,
1990 and has negotiated the following fee with Ecosystems
Engineering and Analysis for evaluation of coastal waste
management strategies and statistical data analyses, on an
hourly-rate basis including labor and overhead, plus direct
costs, technical and clerical assistance, materials, and profit,
in an amount not to exceed $142,000 for a one year period
beginning November 15, 1990.
Professional Services, including .
labor at $65 hr (includes 25%
overhead and 5% profit) $ 84, 000.00
Technical and clerical staff
(at cost + 25% overhead and
5% profit) and materials and
supplies, at cost, not to
exceed $ 55,000.00
Travel and lodging, at cost, not
to exceed $ 3, 000.00
Maximum annual cost $142, 000.00
"K-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-1"
Board of Directors
October 24, 1990
Page Two
The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final
negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and
that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the
consultant.
/s/A.B. "Buck" Catlin /s/William D. Mahoney
A.B. "Buck" Catlin William D. Mahoney
Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman
Selection Committee Selection Committee
/s/Thomas M. Dawes
Thomas M. Dawes
Director of Engineering
Selection Committee
"K-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(h)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 90-157
APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH ECOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING & ANALYSES FOR
ECOLOGICAL CONSULTING AND STATISTICAL DATA
ANALYSES R
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH ECOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING &
ANALYSES FOR ECOLOGICAL CONSULTING AND
STATISTICAL DATA ANALYSES SERVICES
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2,
3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy
establishing procedures for the selection of professional engineering and
architectural services; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with
Ecosystems Engineering & Analyses for ecological consulting and statistical data
analyses services; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of Directors on
October 10, 1990, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said
procedures, has negotiated and certified the final negotiated fee for said
services.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 59 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Professional Services Agreement dated
November 14, 1990, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for
itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, S. 6, 7, 11. 13 and 14, and
Ecosystems Engineering & Analyses, for ecological consulting and statistical
data analyses services for a one-year period beginning November 15, 1990, is
"L-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-1"
hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in
accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows:
Professional Services of
Dr. John R. Calaprice,
at the rate of $65.00 per hour, -
including 25% overhead and
5% profit, not to exceed $ 84,000.00
Technical and clerical staff
services, at cost, plus 25%
overhead and 5% profit; plus
materials and supplies, at
cost, not to exceed 55,000.00
Travel and lodging, at cost,
not to exceed 3,000.00
MAXIMUM TOTAL ANNUAL COST $142,000.00
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for
itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the
General .
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1990.
"L-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(h)(2) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 90-174-3
APPROVING PIPELINE LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH
SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY RE
CONTRACT NO. 3- 4-2
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PIPELINE
LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISON COMPANY IN CONNECTION WITH CONSTRUCTION
OF LAMPSON INTERCEPTOR SEWER, CONTRACT
NO. 3-24-2
* * * * t t t t * t * t * * * * t *
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain pipeline license agreement dated
September 19, 1990, wherein the Southern Pacific Transportation Company (SPTC)
grants to County Sanitation District No. 3 right-of-way to cross under existing
SPTC railroad tracks approximately 250 feet west of Santa Rosalia Street in
Lampson Avenue in order to construct, reconstruct, operate and maintain the
Lampson Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-24-2, is hereby approved and accepted;
and,
Section 2. That the real property over which said right-of-way is granted
Is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached
hereto and made a part of this resolution; and,
Section 3. That payment in the amount of $510.00 for said right-of-way is
hereby authorized; and,
Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the
General Counsel .
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 14, 1990.
"M" AGENDA ITEM #9( J ) - DISTRICT 3 """
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. One (1)
CONTRACTOR: W. H. Ebert Corp. DATE_ November 14. 1990
JOB: South Coast Trunk Sewer. Phase 1. Contract No. 5-35-1
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Badact) $ 26 195.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 - UNDISCLOSED UTILITIES
The Contractor encountered undisclosed concrete metering vaults at Stations
Nos. 105+20 and 120+90 while excavating for the new sewer line. The Contractor
was directed to investigate the undisclosed vaults. The concrete vaults were
evidently part of the abandoned water line. The Contractor was directed to remove
and dispose of the old concrete. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force
account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 12,851.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 3 Calendar Days
Item 2 - RELOCATE BORE PIT
The Contractor was directed to relocate the bore pit from Station No. 132+05.73 to
Station No. 127+00.73 because of an undisclosed gas line which interfered with the
excavation. The Contractor encountered the gas line when excavating for the
borepit. The cost of this item includes potholing to survey the location of a gas
line in the vicinity of the relocated bore pit. This item was accomplished by
Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General
Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 996.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 3 - CONCRETE ENCASEMENT OVER 15-INCH VCP
The Contractor was directed to encase the 15-inch VCP between Manhole A and
Manhole 0 because of the depth of the pipe (approximately 32 feet) , and because of
flooding of the trench, caused by construction adjacent to the site. The
Contractor had to remove the saturated soil at the bottom of the excavation caused
by the flooding. This caused an overwidth condition which required concrete
encasement. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to
Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 827.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"N-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(k) - DISTRICT 5 "N-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. One (1)
CONTRACTOR: W. H. Ebert Corp. DATE_ November 14, 1990
JOB: South Coast Trunk Sewer. Phase 1. Contract No. 5-35-1
Item 4 - UNDISCLOSED CONCRETE WING WALLS
The Contractor encountered two undisclosed concrete wing walls (part of an
abandoned storm drain buried seven feet deep) which crossed the excavation for the
21-inch DIP at Station No. 115+25. The Contractor was directed to remove and
dispose of the wing walls which were in direct conflict with the placement of the
new 21-inch sewer line. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account
pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 11,521.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 3 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 26,195.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 6 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 6 days' extension
of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no
direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or
damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted
and approved by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date June 18, 1990
Original Contract Time 180 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date December 4, 1990
Time Extension this C.O. 6 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 6 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 186 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date December 10, 1990
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
"N-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(k) - DISTRICT 5 "N-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. One (1)
CONTRACTOR: W. H. Ebert Corp. DATE November 14. 1990
JOB: South Coast Trunk Sewer Phase 1
Original Contract Price $ 880,066.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00
This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 26,195.00
Amended Contract Price $ 906,261.00
Board Authorization Date: November 14, 1990
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
SUBMITTED BY: RECOMMENDED BY:
g ✓/G-Yo
Eingineer Date Co struction Manager Date
APPRQV BY: APP VED AS TO FORM:
erector of Engineering Date General counsel Date
W. H. EBERT CORP.
ACCEPTE BY:
C it factor Date
`ter/
"N-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(k) - DISTRICT 5 "N-3"
RESOLUTION NO. 90-175-7
ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO._7 (ANNEXATION NO. 133 -
PELL ANNEXATION
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY
TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 133 - PELL
ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7)
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That a request has heretofore been made to County Sanitation
District No. 7 for annexation of territory to the District by means of a
petition filed by the property owners, Lawrence Pell and Robert J. Zinngrabe;
and,
Section 2. That the designation assigned by the District to the territory
proposed to be annexed is "Annexation No. 133 - Pell Annexation to County
Sanitation District No. 7", the exterior boundaries of which are described on
Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by reference made a
part of this resolution; and,
Section 3. That pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government
Reorganization Act of 1965, Division 3, commencing with Section 56000 of the
California Government Code, application has heretofore been made by District
No. 7 to the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation of said territory
to County Sanitation District No. 7, by means of Resolution No. 89-187-7, filed
with said Commission by said District; and,
Section 4. That the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of
Orange adopted its Resolution No. 90-24 on September 12, 1990, making
determinations and approving proposed Annexation No. 133 to County Sanitation
District No. 7 of Orange County, California, without notice ar hearing and
without election; and,
110-11, AGENDA ITEM #9(n) - DISTRICT 7 "0-1"
Section S. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is uninhabited;
and,
Section 6. That the reason for annexing said territory is to obtain and
provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory; and,
Section 7. That payment of annexation acreage fees in the amount of
$3,781.00 has been made and all terms and conditions specified by the Local
Agency Formation Commission have been satisfied; and,
Section 8. That the District has agreed, pursuant to Section 99(h)(1) of
the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its ad valorem property tax allocation
exchange with other affected taxing agencies; and,
Section 9. That the regular County assessment roll is utilized by this
District; and,
Section 10. That the affected territory will be taxed for the existing
bonded indebtedness of District No. 7; and,
Section 11. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency .
Formation Commission pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government
Reorganization Act of 1985, Division 3, Section 56837 of the California
Government Code, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described
hereinabove, be, and is hereby, ordered annexed to County Sanitation District
No. 7 without notice or hearing and without election; and,
Section 12. That the Secretary of District No. 7 transmit a certified copy
of this resolution, with applicable fees required by Section 54902.5 of the
Government Code, to the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation
Commission of Orange County.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 14, 1990.
"0-2" AGENDA. ITEM #9(n) - DISTRICT 7 ""0-2^
RESOLUTION NO. 90-158
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR JOB NO. P2-42-1
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ELECTRIFICATION OF PUMP
DRIVES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-42-1
* k k k * * k k k k k k k k k
WHEREAS, John Carollo Engineers, Districts' engineers, have completed
preparation of the plans and specifications for Electrification of Pump Drives
at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-1.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the proposed project for Electrification of Pump Drives
at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-1, is hereby approved. Said project was
included in the Program Environmental Impact Report on the 1989 Collection,
Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan approved on July 19, 1989. A
Notice of Determination was filed by the Secretary on July 20, 1989, in
accordance with the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and,
Section 2. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents
this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by John Carollo Engineers,
Districts' engineers, for Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant
No. 2, Jab No. P2-42-1, are hereby approved and adopted; and,
Section 3. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for
bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Public Contracts Code of
the State of California; and,
Section 4. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date
"P-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "P-1"
and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and,
Section 5. That the Secretary and the Districts' Director of Engineering
�.J or his designee be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of
Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 14, 1990.
"P-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "P-2"
COUNTY SANITATION OISfRICTS
d ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
November 5, 1990 Ip2Y2 SAVENUE
O.O.EO%8127
MMMN VLL .WUMRMA 92728410
p1A19B2 11
STAFF REPORT AND SUMMARY OF
Final Supplement No. 1 to
Program Environmental Impact Report
Re
Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9
Background
In 1989 the Directors approved the updated master plan which provided for
facilities necessary to meet flow and regulatory discharge requirements for the
next 30 years. Also approved was an Environmental Impact Report which addressed
most of the master-planned projects. However, three projects included within
that document were only able to be addressed in a general manner and were
designated as needing further review and additional CEQA documentation when the
project was ready to begin the design phase. Job No. I-9, Interplant Pipeline
and Utility Corridor, is one of those projects.
In February the Directors approved a professional services agreement
with John Carollo Engineers to provide environmental services, preliminary and
final design and construction support services for the I-9 project. The design
calls for a new 120-inch diameter sewer line to transport treated wastewater
within a 30-foot corridor along the westerly levee of the Santa Ana River from
the Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant to the Ocean Outfall Booster Station at
Treatment Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach. The new pipeline will be
approximately 18,700 feet long and will replace an old 42-inch line which is
over 60 years old and in poor condition. Other utilities are located in the
interplant corridor and the Master Plan identified immediate and future
interplant utility requirements including new pipelines for pure oxygen,
industrial (reclaimed) water, sludge, interplant digester gas lines and
communications facilities. The estimated cost of this project is $32 million.
Located within the existing corridor are power poles which belong to
Southern California Edison which will have to be relocated per our easement
agreement of 1977. Staff, Edison and General Counsel are attempting to reach
agreement on this issue; however, as of this writing, legal action may be
required.
At Plant No. 2 there are several oil leases which have operating wells
which interfere with the construction of the pipelines and they must be
purchased, removed and abandoned. Authority was granted in August to enter into
negotiations with the leaseholders and negotiations are in progress.
The Corps of Engineers in conjunction with the County of Orange have also
scheduled Santa Ana River channel improvements which could conflict with the
construction of this project and the possible impacts and scheduling constraints
must be addressed.
"�-1" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-1"
Final Supplement No. 1
The Final Supplement No. 1 provides a basis to determine the effects of
the proposed project on the environment and as a vehicle to coordinate this
project with the Orange County Water District's "Green Acres" water reclamation
project and the County of Orange/Corps of Engineers flood control improvement
project on the Santa Ana River between the river mouth and the San Diego
Freeway.
On October 10, 1990, the comment period on the Draft Supplement No. 1
ended and a public hearing was held. No oral comments were received. All
written comments received in response to the Notice of Preparation were
addressed in the Draft Supplement No. 1, provided to the Directors in October,
and are not summarized herein. In many cases, a final EIR consists solely of
addressing comments received in response to the draft EIR. In this case, the
Draft EIR was rewritten to include in the appropriate sections information
received or changes deemed necessary as a result of the comments received. This
was done, in part, because so few comments were received. The comments on Draft
Supplement No. 1 are summarized below:
Respondent Comments
State of California, Office Notice that State Clearinghouse
of Planning and Research requirements have been met.
State of California, Department Permit notification.
of Transportation
State Water Resources Control Technical clarification; questions
Board regarding operations and
maintenance; accident procedures/
precautions.
Mesa Consolidated Water District Utility Information.
County of Orange, Environmental Bike trail concerns; oil well
Management Agency abandonment; schedules; levee
stability; contractors equipment;
staging and scheduling of
construction.
Pro.iected Impacts
The impacts of the project are both short term caused by the construction
as well as long term after completion of the project. The long-term effects
include the fact that this project will facilitate population and employment
increases. Those items were addressed in the 1989 Master Plan Environmental
Impact Report and are not repeated in this document.
Short-term effects include typical construction activity impacts,.changes
to the property, impacts on adjacent property owners, including streets and
other public services. The Report identifies the mitigation measures to reduce
..✓ the disruption. Probably the largest disruption is to the Santa Ana River bike
"0-2" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "Q-2"
trail which must be relocated when this and the adjacent (and concurrent) Santa
Ana River Mainstem project are implemented. Staff is working with the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and the County of Orange to reduce and minimize the effects
of this project. Together with the County of Orange EMA, a temporary facility
may be required as an alternate bikeway path. The report includes the
requirement that the Districts obtain encroachment permits and comply with
conditions identified by the County of Orange EMA, coordinate with the Corps of
Engineers, and obtain other necessary permits from appropriate regulatory
agencies. Permits and easements must also be obtained from Southern California
Edison, the City of Huntington Beach, the Coastal Commission, the State
Department of Fish and Game, and the Division of Industrial Safety.
The Final Supplement No. 1 addresses all concerns received. The recommended
actions are to receive this report; receive and file and approve the Final
Supplement No. 1 and adopt a resolution certifying same; and adopt a resolution
making certain findings and a statement of overriding considerations; and,
lastly, authorizing filing a Notice of Determination.
TMD:jt
ENG/1/9:SR4
�d
"0-3" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-3
RESOLUTION NO. 90-159
CERTIFYING FINAL SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 TO PROGRAM EIR
FOR COLLECTION. TRUTMENT AND DI A ILITIE
MAb[ER PLAN - 1 E ERP NT PIPELINE AND
UTILITY CORRIDOR. B N . I-9 E "PROJEC •
%WrffG CE— R�I�FINOITURE� NG T I NIFICANT
�JENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTSIDENTIFIED N PPLEME T
NO. I TO PROGRAM EIR: ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF
E IDIN N E N ; A0 PTING MITI ATI
MEASURES AND M NITORINU PLAN; AND AU HORIZING T E
FI I G OF X OTICE OF DETERMINATION RE 5AIU
PROJECT
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
CERTIFYING THE FINAL SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 TO PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR COLLECTION,
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES MASTER PLAN -
'1989 RE INTERPLANT PIPELINE AND UTILITY CORRIDOR,
JOB NO. I-9 (THE "PROJECT"); MAKING CERTAIN
FINDINGS RELATING TO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL
EFFECTS IDENTIFIED IN SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 TO PROGRAM
EIR; ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERA-
TIONS; ADOPTING MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING
PLAN: AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
DETERMINATION RE SAID PROJECT
* t t t t * R * * * t * * * t
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California ("Districts") ,
certified the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for Collection,
Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan ("EIR") in July 1989; and,
WHEREAS, the Districts are the Lead Agency for the preparation and
consideration of environmental documents for the projects contained with the
1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, ("CEQA") , the State of
California CEQA Guidelines and the Districts' CEQA procedures; and,
WHEREAS, the Districts are presently considering the approval of
project, described as the Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9
"R-1" AGENDA ITEM t112(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "R-1"
(the "Project") ; and,
WHEREAS, Districts have determined additional environmental studies
are required before proceeding with the Project, described as Supplement No. 1
("Supplement") ; and,
WHEREAS, to assess the Project's environmental impacts objectively,
the Districts have caused to have prepared a Draft Supplement No. 1 to Program
Environmental Impact Report for Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities
Master Plan ("Draft") to assess the significant environmental impacts,
mitigation measures, and alternatives associated with the Project; and,
WHEREAS, the Districts have consulted with other public agencies and
the general public, giving them an opportunity to comment on the Draft as
required by CEQA; and,
WHEREAS, on October 10, 1990, the Boards of Directors of the Districts
held a duly-noticed public hearing to provide a further opportunity for the
general public to comment on and respond to the Draft; and,
WHEREAS, the Districts have objectively evaluated the comments from
public agencies and persons who reviewed the Draft; and
WHEREAS, the comments and recommendations received on the Draft,
either in full or in summary, togethgr with the Districts' responses to
significant environmental concerns raised in the review and consultation
process, have been included in the Final Supplement No. 1 to Program
Environmental Impact Report for Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities
Master Plan re Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9,
("Supplement"); and,
WHEREAS said Supplement has been presented to the members of the
Boards of Directors of the Districts for review and consideration prior to the
final approval of, and commitment to, the Project.
"R-2" AGENDA ITEM #12(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "R-2"
NOW, THEREFORE, THE Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
�..J Section 1: That the Boards of Directors do hereby certify that the
Final Supplement No. 1 to EIR has been completed in compliance with CEQA, the
State CEQA Guidelines, and the Districts' CEQA procedures, and that the Boards
of Directors have reviewed and considered the information contained in the Final
Supplement prior to approval of, or commitment to, the Project. The Final
Supplement No. 1 consists of the following two documents:
A. "Draft Supplement No.- 1 to Program Environmental Impact Report on
Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan addressing Interplant
Pipeline and Utility Corridor Project, Joint Treatment Works Project I-911, dated
August 1990; and,
B. "Final Supplement No. 1 to Program Environmental Impact Report on
Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan addressing Interplant
Pipeline and Utility Corridor Project, Joint Treatment Works Project I-911, dated
September 1990.
Section 2: That the Master Plan and the Final Supplement No. 1 to the
Program EIR have fully and adequately addressed all expressed environmental
concerns resulting from the proposed construction of the Project.
Section 3: That the proposed Project will create a number of significant
or potentially significant environmental effects. These impacts are identified
in Table 1 of the Final Supplement No. 1 to Final Program EIR, that are appended
to this Resolution as Attachment A.
Section 4: That the Boards of Directors of DISTRICTS do further find
that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
proposed Project which avoid or substantially lessen significant environmental
'r..d
"R-3" AGENDA ITEM #12(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "R-3"
effects, as identified in the Final Supplement No. 1 to Final Program EIR.
Section 5: Significant impacts identified in the Final Supplement No. 1
to Final Program EIR will be mitigated to less-than-significant levels by the �..✓
DISTRICTS as specified in Attachment A to this Resolution.
Section 6: The DISTRICTS will implement mitigation measures for impacts
Identified as less than significant in the Final Supplement No. 1 as specified
in Attachment A to this Resolution.
Section 7: The DISTRICTS hereby adopt the following monitoring and
reporting program to ensure implementation of the mitigation measures described
In Sections 5 and 6.
A. Within 30 days following adoption of this Resolution, the
General Manager, or his designee, shall appoint an Environmental Monitor
responsible for coordinating mitigation monitoring and reporting activities.
B. The Environmental Monitor shall review the design of the Project
and certify that the facility design complies with Final Supplement No. 1
mitigation measures, or recommend to the Director of Engineering design
modifications necessary to achieve such compliance. In addition, prior to the
DISTRICTS obtaining bids for construction, the Environmental Monitor shall
review the bid documents and certify compliance with applicable mitigation
measures.
C. Within 60 days of the adoption of this Resolution, the
Environmental Monitor shall design a checklist to demonstrate compliance with
mitigation measures in the field during construction of the Project. The
Director of Engineering shall assign staff responsibilities for completing this
checklist, and certify compliance with mitigation measures during and after
construction of the Project.
D. The Director of Engineering shall prepare reports to the General
"R-4" AGENDA ITEM #12(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "R-4"
Manager of the status of mitigation measure implementation.
Section 8: The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, have balanced
the benefits of the Project against its unavoidable environmental risks in
determining whether to approve the Project. The Boards hereby find that the
occurrence of the unavoidable significant environmental effects identified in
the Final Supplement No. 1 to the Final Program EIR and set forth in Attachment
A attached hereto is acceptable for the following reason:
A. The Project is necessary to ensure continued conveyance of the
Plant No. 1 effluent to the ocean outfall as well as upgrading interplant
communications, providing a reclaimed water line for in-plant use, and
Installation of a digester gas line which will allow use of the digester gas at
either treatment facility.
Section 9: The Project described in Final Supplement No. 1 is the
preferred alternative and is hereby approved.
Section 10: That the Board Secretary is authorized and directed to file
the Notice of Determination and any other documents in accordance with the
requirements of CEQA and the DISTRICTS' CEQA procedures.
PASSED AND ADOPTED AT THE REGULAR MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 14, 1990.
11R-5" AGENDA ITEM #12(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "R-5"
RESOLUTION NO. 90- -
APPFOVING CAPITAL IMPROM1IENP PROGRAM, 1990-92 SERIES A
CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION PURSUANT TO ADOPTED LONG-RANGE �a✓
FINANCIAL PLAN
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT NO. OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING
THE PREPARATION, EXECUTION AMID DELIVERY CF NOT TO EXCEED
$100,000,000 AGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF CERTIFICATES OF
PARTICIPATION (Capital 1uprrovement Program, 1990-92 Series A);
APPROVING A TRUST AGRE M , AGUMENi 1' FOR ACQUISITION AMID
CO757RUC1'ICN, ASSIGNMENT AGEM ENT, PURCHASE CONTRACT,
RE-1fRKE.TING AQ E 4EN1', REDIBURSEMW AG2EEM4ENT, PREIMUNARY
OFFICIAL STAMMNT AND THE DISTRIBUTION THEREOF, AND CERTAIN
ACTIONS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; AMID APPOINTING NATIONAL
WESUiUZIER BANK PLC, SAN FRANCISCO OVERSEAS BRANCH AS LETTER
OF CREDIT BANK AMID THNIAS COWERCE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS
TRUSTEE
WHEREAS, this County Sanitation District of Orange County, California
(the "District") proposes to acquire, construct and install certain improveaents
to joint facilities and certain other public improvements (the "Projects"); and
WHEREAS, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California
(the "Districts") propose to finance the acquisition, construction and
installation of the Projects; and
WHEREAS, it has been proposed that the District acquire, construct and
install the Projects pursuant to an Agreement for Acquisition and Construction,
dated as of November 1, 1990, by and among the Districts (the "Acquisition
Agreement"), the proposed form of which has been presented to this Hoard of
Directors, pursuant to which the Districts will agree to make certain
installment payments (the "Installment Payments") in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, it has been proposed that the District grant, assign and
transfer all of its rights to receive the Installment Payments to Texas
Co=exce Bank National Association, as trustee (the "Trustee") pursuant to an
Assignment Agreement, dated as of November 1, 1990, by and among the Districts
and the Trustee (the "Assignment Agreement"), the proposed form of which has
been presented to this Board of Directors; and
waEREAS, the Districts have determined that it would be in the best
interest of the Districts and the residents within the Districts to authorize,
pursuant to the Trust Agreement, dated as of Novedoer 1, 1990, among the Trustee
and the Districts (the "Trust Agreement"), the proposed form of which has been
presented to this Board of Directors, the Preparation, execution and delivery by
the Trustee of Certificates of Participation (Capital Improvement Program,
1990-92 Series A) in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $100,000,000
(the "Certificates"), which Certificates evidence and represent direct and
proportionate interests in the Principal Components and Interest Components of the Installment Payments; and 1
"S-1" AGENDA ITEM #16(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "S-1"
WHERBAS, in order to secure the payment of principal and interest
with respect to the certificates, it has been proposed that the Districts
obtain a Letter of Credit to be issued by National Westminster Bank PIC,
San Francisco Overseas Branch (the "Bank") pursuant to the terms and
conditions set forth in the Reimbursement Agreement, dated as of November
1, 1990, among the Districts and the Bank (the "Beimbursenw.nt Agreement"),
the proposed form of which has been presented to this Board of Directors;
and
WBEI :AS, it has been proposed that Merrill Lynch & Co. (the
"Underwriter") purchase the Certificates pursuant to a Certificate Purchase
Agreement among the Underwriter and the Districts (the "Purchase
Contract"), the proposed form of which has been presented to this Board of
Directors; and
WHEMAS, to facilitate the remarketing of the Certificates, it.
has been proposed that the Districts enter into a Remarketing Agreement,
dated as of November 1, 1990 by and among the Districts and Merrill Lynch &
Co. as Remarketing Agent (the "Remarketing Agreement") the proposed form of
which has been presented to this Board of Directors; and
WBEREAS, there has been presented to this Board of Directors a
Preliminary Official Statement relating to the Certificates (the
"Preliminary Official Statement"); and
WffiiEAS, it is proposed that the terms of the financing
contemplated by the foregoing shall be subject to the limitations set forth
herein; and
WaEREAS, this District has determined that it is in the best
interest of this District and the residents within the District to approve
the Preliminary Official Statement and authorize and approve the
transactions contemplated thereby; and
NOW, THEFaTORE, the Board of Directors of the District does
hereby resolve as follows:
Section 1: That the Trust Agreement, the Acquisition Agreement,
the Assignment Agreement, the Purchase Contract, the Remarketing Agreement,
and the Reimbursement Agreement, in the fora presented to his Board of
Directors, are hereby approved. The Chai�n or Chairman pro tempore and
the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary are authorized and directed for and
in the name of the District to execute and deliver said agreements. The
agreements shall be executed in the forms hereby approved, with such
additions thereto and changes therein as are (i) approved in accordance
with Section 3 hereof, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the
execution and delivery thereof or (ii) recommended or approved by Special
Counsel to the Districts and approved by such officers, such approval to be
conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery thereof.
S-2" AGENDA ITEM #16(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "S-2"
Section 2: That this Hoard of Directors hereby authorizes the
preparation, execution and delivery of the Certificates in accordance with
the terms and provisions of the Trust Agreement (as executed and delivered) .
Section 3: The agreements referred to in Section 1 of this
Resolution shall, vhen executed and delivered pursuant to Section 1 of this
Resolution, contain such additions and changes as shall have been approved
by the General Manager of the Districts (or, in the absence of the General
Manager, the Director of Finance) (the "Manager"), subject to the following
limitations:
(a) the aggregate principal amount of the certificates shall not
exceed $100,000,000, and the aggregate principal amount of
the Installment Paynents of the District shall not excess
the amount set forth with respect to the District in the
following schedule:
District No. Principal A[rount
1 . . . . . . . . $ 9,260,000
2 . . . . . . . . $26,250,000
3 . . . . . . . . $28,370,000
5 . . . . . . . . $ 8,480,000
6 . . . . . . . . $ 6,920,000
7 . . . . . . . . $ 9,810,000
11 . . . . . . . . $ 8,570,000
13 . . . . . . . . $ 340,000
14 . . . . . . . . $ 2,000,000
(b) the initial interest rate with respect to the Certificates
shall not excess 8.00%;
(c) the annual fee to the Bank not exceed 0.30% per annum of the
stated amount of such Letter of Credit;
(d) the final Installment Payment of the District under the
Acquisition Agreement shall be due and payable not later
than August 1, 2015; and
(e) the Underwriter's discount (excluding any original issue
discount) under the Purchase Contract shall not exceed .595%
of the aggregate principal amount of the Certificates.
Section 4: The Preliminary Official Statement presented to
this Board of Directors is hereby approved, and the distribution of said
Preliminary Official Statement (with such additions and changes as are
consistent with this Resolution and the limits prescribed herein and
approved by the Manager) to prospective purchasers of the Certificates is
hereby approved•
"S-3" AGENDA ITEM #16(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "S-3"
Section 5: The Chairman or Chairman pro tore is authorized
and directed to execute and deliver a final Official Statement in
accordance with the Purchase Contract in substantially the form of the
Preliminary Official Statement, and such additions thereto and changes
therein as are consistent with this Resolution and the limits prescribed
herein and recotmended or approved by Special Counsel to the Districts and
approved by such officers and employees, such approval to be conclusively
evidenced by the execution and delivery thereof.
Section 6: That this Hoard of Directors hereby appoints Texas
Commerce Bank National Association as the Trustee under the Trust
Agreement.
Section 7: That this Board of Directors hereby appoints
National Westminster Bank PLC, San Francisco Overseas Branch as the letter
of Credit bank.
Section 8• The Chairman, Chairman pro to pore, Secretary and
any other officer, official or member of the staff of the District is each
authorized and directed, jointly and severally, to do any and all things
and to execute and deliver any and all documents which they nay deem
necessary and advisable in order to effectuate the purposes of this
Resolution, and such actions previously taken by such officers are hereby
ratified and confirmed.
section 9: This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon
its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 14, 1990.
"S-4" AGENDA ITEM #16(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "S-4"
RESOLUTION NO. 90-171
APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERINGCORPORATION FOR
DESIGN OF JOB N -17
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR DESIGN OF
CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17, PROVIDING FOR
ADDITIONAL DESIGN SERVICES RELATIVE TO THE INTERIOR
OF THE LABORATORY
WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into a Professional
Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of Central
Laboratory, Job No. J-17; and,
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 provided for additional engineering services to
accommodate proposed change in the location of the site of the laboratory and
other design and scope of work changes; and,
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 2 provided for wage escalations due to delays in the
project plus construction management/inspection services; and,
WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend the agreement with
Boyle Engineering Corporation to provide for additional design services relative
to the interior of the laboratory to accommodate changing needs and to handle
the expanded scope of work and increased demands placed on the Laboratory; and,
WHEREAS, the Building Committee has recommended approval of Addendum No. 3
to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for
design of the Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17, and has negotiated a fee for
said additional design services.
NOV. THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Addendum No. 3 dated November 14, 1990, to that certain
"T-1" AGENDA ITEM #17(b)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "T-1"
"agreement dated August 13, 1986, by and between County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 and Boyle Engineering Corporation, for
design of Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17, providing for additional design
�✓ services relative to the interior of the laboratory, is hereby approved and
accepted; and,
Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased by an amount
not to exceed $150,000.00, as follows, which increases the total authorized
compensation from $491,703.00 to an amount not to exceed $641,703.00:
Existing Change per Amended
Agreement Addendum No. 3 Agreement
Professional Services, at
hourly rates for labor
plus overhead at 155.5%.
not to exceed $277,398 $ 93,511 $370,909
Direct Expenses,
not to exceed 5,000 -0- 5,000
Subconsultant Fees,
not to exceed 12,750 -0- 12,750
Fixed Profit 40,395 11,689 52,084
SUBTOTALS $335,543 $105,200 $440,743
Resident Project
Representative, at
hourly rates for labor
including overhead and
profit ($80/hour) , -
not to exceed $156,160 44,900 $200,960
TOTALS $491,703 $150,000 $641,703
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for
itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 3 in form approved by the
General Counsel . -
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 14, 1990.
"T-2" AGENDA ITEM k17(b) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "T-2"
OMM SANITAT CN DISTRICTS OF CHANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 15
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 T;TT.TC AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, alLIIMUelrA 92708
CHANCE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Seven (7)
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE November 14. 1990
JOB: YAREH( E AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING
IWROVEMENIS, JOB NO. J-20
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 204,087.60
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract cork are hereby autharized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions front the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 - Er.m ATOR VENTILATOR AND SHEET METAL ADDITION
The Contractor was directed to furnish and inst&U 18 gauge sheet metal plugs for
existing Shop B wall openings where they abut Building 3 and a roof ventilator
for the elevator equipment roan in Building 6. These additions were not shown on
the Contract Drawings nor included in the Contract Specifications. This item of
work was ar,-, %A j sa_Mei by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section
10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: FC0 31)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 780.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: - 2 Calendar Days
Item 2 - LI E•1'ING FI}CI M CHANGES IN B=INGS 5 AND 6
The Contractor was directed to perform the following electrical changes and
modifications:
A. Due to the change from a suspended ceiLulg to drywall ceiling, delete the
Contract specified Type D lighting fixtures in Building 6 men's and women's
bathrooms lavatories and outer foyer and add surface mount Type G.
B. Install two receptacles for drinking fountains on the second floor of
R,iini n 6.
C. Install a circuit for Ventilation Fan EF-2 in Building 6.
D. Change specified Type G to Type X recessed light fixture in Stair E in
Building 5 due to space limitations. The above work was not shown on the
Contract Drawings or Contract Specifications.
These it of work were aa.cupLished by Contractor's force amount pursuant to
Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO #20)
A.DDEO COST MW CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,640.00
TIML SaHNICB THIS CHANCE ORDER TIFM: 4 Calendar Days
11U-111 AGENDA ITEM #17(b)(4)(a) - ALL DISTRICTS 11U-1"
CCEZ17Y SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 15
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 2CS.TS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANCE ORDER
...�
C. 0. NO. Sever !71
CCN`rRPCTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE November 14, 1990
JOB: WAREHOUSE AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING
IMPROVIIffiNTS, JOB NO. J-20
Item 3 - KITCHEN APPLIANCE CIRCUITRY FUR BUILDING 6
The Contractor was directed to provide circuitry, conduit and wiring in the
kitchen of Building-6 for installation of a refrigerator, oven, cooktap, range
hood fan and garbage disposal. These electrical additions were not shown on the
Contract Drawings nor included in the Contract Specifications. This item of work
was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of
the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH #23)
ADDED COST THI CHANGE CHEER rIEM: $ 4,513.00
TINE EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 4 Calendar Days
Item 4 - MISCELTANEOUS ELECTRICAL CIRCUITRY FOR B=ING 6
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install conduits and wiring to provide
circuits for an air dryer, hot water circulation pump and hot water heater
electric gas igniter. Also included in this item is the furnishing and
installation of two additional thermostat control boxes and cmxhut in Ronk 102A
and 103A of Building 5. The above work was not shown on the Contract Drawings nor
included in the Contract Specifications. These items of work were accomplished by
Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General
Provisions. (Reference: PCH 27)
ADDED COST TFrT CHANCE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,626.00
TIME EOTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 5 Calendar Days
Item 5 - FIRE ALARM SYSTEM AND TELEPHONE CONDUIT ADDITION FOR BUILDING 6
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install a fire sprinkler alarm for
Buildings 5 and 6. This work involved installing additional condL t and wiring
from the fire sprinkler flow switch and tanper switches on the —at side of
wilding 6 to the new fire alarm control panel located in the Administration
Building. Also included in this item is the furnishing and installation of two
additional 2-inch telephone conduits from Building 4 to Building 6; installation
of two additional telephone outlets in Rooms 101 and 201 of Building 6; addition
of a card reader on the exterior of door No. 1 in Building 6; addition of two low
Profile light fixtures in Stairways B and C. These electrical additions were not
shown on the Contract Drawings nor included in the Contract Specifications. This
item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section
10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 21 and PCH 24)
ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: $ 12,626.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CH]NNGE ORDER ITEM: 7 Calendar Days
"U-2" AGENDA ITEM #17(b)(4)(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-2"
COUNTY m m cm DIBTRICTs aF ORANGE COUNW Page 3 of 15
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 EGLTS AVENUE
POnWON VALLEY, [`aT.TFaRUA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Seven (7)
CON77RA=: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE Novenber 14, 1990
JOB: NAHEHWSE AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING
IMPROVEMENTS, JOB N0. J-20
Item 6 - REMOVAL OF U11SUT2ABI.E SOM UNDER BUMDING 6 ELEVATOR PIT
The Contractor was directed to remove and dispose of an additional 4 feet of
unsuitable oversaturated clay soil material from under the elevator pit in
Building 6, and pads of Buildings 5 and 6. The removal was directed by the
Districts' Soil Consultant in order to provide a stable pad for construction of
the building elevator pit because the elevation is 4 feet below floor level.
Contract plans and specifications did not include the above additional work. This
item of cork was acccuplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section
10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: YCO 9)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER =: $ 4,942.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 5 Calendar Days
Item 7 - BUILDING 8 FICLMATION REUUCRCING STEEL ADDITION
The Contractor was directed to add reinforcing steel daaels at 18 inches on center
along the rear foundation of Building 8 to tie the building concrete floor slab to
the footing along Plan Reference Lines C and 5. This was done at the direction of
the project structural engineer in order to provide foundation stability and as an
alternative to overexcmvation and recovtoaction of evicting soils six feet beyond
the rear foundation into Fuentes Drive. Oversxcavation and recompaction was
*mired. in the project geotechnical report but was never included in the Contract
Plans or Specifications. This item of work was acccuplished by Contractor's force
account pursuant to'Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference:
PCH 3)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER TIEM: $ 919.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER Pffi4: 2 Calendar Days
"U-3" AGENDA ITEM #17(b) (4) (a) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-3"
C=?TY SAHITATIM DISMCTS OF CHANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 15
P. O. BCX 8127 - 10844 P.TT.TR AVENUE
FaRnAIN VALTEY, allZE 1 UEA 92708
CHANCE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Seven (7)
CONOP=R: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE November 14, 1990
JOB: MUKBCkM AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING AND OM STORAGE AND DISPENSING
IDPRWIIE'N15, JOB NO. J-20
Item 8 - ELEVATOR SHAFT AND E(A nMV ROM CHANGES
The Contractor was directed to construct a separate wall between the elevator
shaft and equipment roam in Building 6. The exposed roof drain inside the
elevator ems,=rnent room in Building 6 was also required to be walled in. The wall
consisted of 2 x 6 studs 10 feet wide by 25 feet high, covered with drywall and
painted. Drywall was also added to the ceilings in both areas. Included in this
item were several electrical additions consisting of a light fixture, receptacle
and switch mounted in the elevator emergency pit and emergency telephone for the
elevator car. The above additional work was not included in the Contract and is
_,;red by the California Division of Industrial Safety Elevator Section. This
item of work was accomplished on a tine-and-materials basis pursuant to Section
10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE CRDER ITEM: $ 13,146.00
TIME EK=ICN TBIS CHAR ORDER 1T@d: 10 Calendar Days
Item 9 - BUILDING 6.BATffiXOCM DOOR ADDITICN
The Contractor was directed to add two privacy doors to separate the men's and
wo en's bathroom lavatory area from the main entrance foyer in Building 6. The
work consisted of furnishing and installing two 3-foot x 6-foot 8-inch doors,
frames and panic hardware, exit signs and painting, which was not included in the
Contract. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account
pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 26)
ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER Tlad: $ 3,252.00
TIME EXTENSIC N THIS CHANGE CRDER Tl'F3d: 3 Calendar Days
Item 10 - ERAmnr. ADDITIONS TO BUILDINGS 5 & 6
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install additional wood framing in a
numdxr of different locations inside Buildings 5 and 6. The additional work
consisted of ceiling g framing inside Building 6 men's and women's bathroom area,
framing the underside of Stairway Landings B and C in Building 6, adding skylight
shaft framing for eight skylights inside Buildings 5 and 6, framing a folding door
pocket inside Bing 6, Room 207, misa ous fusing and framing to conceal
piping, and ductwork and structural steel in Buildings 5 and 6. The above
additions were not shown on the Contract Drawings nor included in the Contract
Specifications. These items of work were accomplished by Contractor's force
amount pursuant to to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions.
(Reference: ETD 32)
ADDED COST IBIS CHANGE CRDER IT M: $ 18,312.00
TIME EXTENSIC N THIS CHANGE C RDER rM: 31 Calendar Days
"U 4" AGENDA ITEM #17(b)(4)(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-4"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF CHANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 15
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 EIT.TC AVENUE
FIXIDITAIN VALLEY, CALIECR1ZIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. Seven (7)
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE November 14. 1990
JOB: VAREHOUSE AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING
IIMPROVE1.1ENIS. JOB N0. J-20
Item 11 - LAVATORY DRYNALL CEIII G - BUILDING 6
The Contractor was directed to delete the contract-specified reflected ceiling and
furnish, install and finish a drywall Ceiling in the men's and w®wn's lavatory area
of Building 6. This change was made because the moist environment of the
lavatories is incompatible with a reflected ceiling installation. A credit of
$500.00 was received from the Contractor for deletion of the reflected ceiling.
This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to
Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: ECO 34)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 307.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days
Item 12 - DR7lIQM DOOR POCKET - BUILDING 6 - ROOM 207
The Contractor was directed to furnish, install and finish drywall enclosing an
additional folding door pocket -in Room 207 of Building 6. The additional door
pocket had to be added when it was discovered that the total length of the folding
door in the open position was twice as long as shown on the Contract Drawings.
This item of work was acconplished on a time-and-material basis pursuant to
Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: POO #34)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 700.00
TIM EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days
Item 13 - DRYwTAI.L UNDER STAn;N*WS C AND D - BUILDING 6
The Contractor was directed to furnish, install and finish firestop drywall on the
underside of floor joists supporting Stairways C and D in A,ildi 6. This was
required by the Uniform Building Code to meet fire resistive requirements where
the envelope of the lower stairwell did not cover the second floor stairwell.
This additional drywall was not shown an the Contract Drawings nor included in the
Contract Specifications. This item of work was aoamplished by Contractor's force
account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference
POD 34)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,020.00
TIME EXTENSICN THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 5 Calendar Days
"U-5" AGENDA ITEM #17(b)(4)(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-5"
COUNTY SANrnemrON DISTRICTS OF 0RANGE COUNTY Page 6 of 15
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELISS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VAIM, alllFrr UUA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Seven (7)
CIXBgPCICR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE November 44. 1990
JCB: WAREHOUSE AND MINPENANCE BUILDING AND OM STORAGE AND DISPENSING;
IMPROVEMENTS, JOB NO. J-20
Item 14 - BUILDING 4 WALL HEIGHT INCREASE
The Contractor was directed to increase the height of all Building 4 tilt-up
concrete wall panels by two feet 5y inches. This was done in order to increase
the height of Building 4 to match the parapet of the abutting existing warehouse
building. Different parapet elevations were shown on the Contract Drawings for
each hulling which prevented the building fry matching architecturally. Work
included in this item consisted of carpentry and form lumber required in
lengthening wall panel casting beds and the costs of additional concrete. This
item of work was -,c plished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section
10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,560.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER TTEM: 14 Calendar Days
Item 15 - AUTO SHOP SPRINKLER HEAD REPLACEMENT
The Contractor was directed to replace 78 fire sprinkler heads previously
installed in the eYl..ri n� Vehi.cle Maintenance Building. The heads had
inadvertently been painted by the Districts maintenance staff during repainting of
the building ceiling, reducing the ability of the heads to function properly. The
City of Fountain Valley Fire Department inspector required that they be replaced.
This itm of work was acccoplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to
Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Prwisions. (Reference: ECO 36)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER TTEM: $ 1,293.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days
Item I - BUILDINGS 4 AND 7 FENCING ADDITICN
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install 50 linear feet of 8-foot high
fencing at Building 4 and 15 linear feet of 6-foot high fencing with 3-foot wide
gate at Building 7. The additional fencing was requested by the Districts to
provide better security around the buildings and was not shown on the Contract
Drawings. This item of cork was accomplished by Contractor's force account
pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 15)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,820.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER P&24: 0 Calendar Days
"U-6" AGENDA ITEM #17(b)(4)(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-6
COUNTY sn*mv CN DISIRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 7 of 15
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 SLT.IS AVENUE
EUuNn N VALLEY, CALIFCM41A 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. Seven !7)
CONIRA=: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE November 14. 1990
JOB: WAREHOUSE AND b%DnEWOCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING
IIW)ROVEMENPS, JOB NO. J-20
Item 17 - PERSONNEL ANNEX FIRE SPRINKE R DE=ON
The Contractor was not required to furnish and install a new fire sprinkler system
in the existing temporary trailers housing the Personnel Annex as shown on the
Contract Drawings. As these buildings are of a temporary nature, the City of
Fountain Valley Fire Department waived the requirement for installation of a fire
sprinkler system. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant
to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference PCH 15)
CREDIT THIS CHANGE. ORDER ITEM: $ (2,310.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER r1EM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 18 - BUILDING 7 FTRESTW DRYWALL
The Contractor was directed to furnish, install and finish two layers of 5/8-inch
firestop drywall on the underside of the roof of Building 7 and 25 feet into
adjacent buildings. This was a requirement of the City of Fountain Valley
Building Department not included in the Contract. The justification for this
additional work was fireproofing the wood ceiling and roof structure in and around
the oil storage area. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force
account pnrs,ant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions.
(Reference: PCH 15)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 23,487.00
TIME EOFMISION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 14 Calendar Days
Item 19 - BUILDING 4 REIMICRCING STEEL. ADDITION
The Contractor was directed to add additional vertical and horizontal reinforcing
steel due to the increase in height of the tilt-up concrete wall panels in
Building 4 by 2 feet Sh inches. This was done in order to increase the height of
Building 4 to match the parapet of the abutting existing Warehouse Building.
Different parapet elevations were shown on the Contract Drawings for each building
which prevented the building from matching architecturally. Work included in this
item consisted of furnishing, cutting and placement of the additional reinforcing
steel. This item of work was accouplished by Contractor's force account pursuant
to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 12)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,625.00
TIME EMINSION THIS CHANGE ORDER rl'EM: 2 Calendar Days
"U-7" AGENDA ITEM #17(b)(4)(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-7"
COUNTY SANITAT M DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 8 of 15
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 FJ-1-1S AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALT.EY, CALIEUR IIA 92708
`►
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. Seven (7)
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE Nwmber 14. 1990
JOB: WARE[T(A15E AND NW3I7TENAXE BUILDING AND OIL 67CRA(E AND DISPENSING
IMPROVEMENTS, JOB NO. J-20 ..
Item 20 - ➢ELETIM OF BUILDING 7 ROILING SEWICE DOORS
The Contractor was directed to delete three rolling serviCe doors enclosed in the
front of Building 7 which were included in the Contract. The doors were deleted
when the Districts decided to modify the design of the b ildi„ leaving the front
open. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section
10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 15)
CREDIT TRT CHANCE CRUM ITEM: $ (9,000.00)
TIME EM21SICN THIS CM111 E ORDER TIEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 21 - STRUCTURAL STEEL FDDIFICATICNS
The Contractor was directed to make a nudrr of modifications to the structural
steel members in aiildings 1, 2, 6, and 7. These changes included shortening the
steel columns in Buildings 1 and 2 in order to match the parapet height of
existing ng Building rli ng 7; mmUfythg the stairway supports in Building 6 due to
revisions by the project architect and deleting four steel columms supporting
a,ilaing 7 exterior doors which were deleted. included in this item are
additional costs inn,-red by the steel fabricator in revising the structural steel
shop drawings. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to
Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 8, PCH 10 and
PCH 15)
ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,088.00
THE EX'ffi1SI0N THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 5 Calendar Days
. Item 22 - PLiAf= MAIN ADDITION FOR BUILDINGS 1, 2, AND 7
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install a roof drainage system for
Buildings 1 and 2 and a waste oil suvg drainage system for the oil dock in
Building 7. Also included are rerouting of existing roof drains in Building g 7 and
lowering of two site catch basin drain covers due to changes in paving grades.
This item includes a credit of $1,140.00 for deletion of one shower and one urinal
in the men's bathroom in Building 6. The above work was not shown on the Contract
Drawings nor included in the Contract Specifications. This item of work was
accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the
General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 15)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER rnm: $ 20,165.00
TD+rE EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 7 Calendar Days
"U-R" AGENDA ITEM #17(h)(4)(2) - ALL DISTRICTS U-R"
COUNTY SAN TATICH DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 9 of 15
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 FTT.TC AVENUE
ECUN AIN VALTZY, CA1aFMKM 92708
CHANCE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Seven (7)
CQTIRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE November 14, 1990
JOB: FIAREHQUSE AND NAIIPMMNZE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING
IMTO h1ENTS. JOB NO. J-20
Item 23 - PAINTING OF HOOF DRAIN PIPING IN BUII.DINGS 1 AND 2
The Contractor was directed to paint roof drain piping installed in Building Buildinge 1
and 2. Painting of the added roof drains (Item 22) was riot i.nclvded in the
Contract. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force aocwnt
pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 15)
ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: $ 960.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Itm 24 - HAMaRE REWSIM FOR BUILDING 6
The Contractor was directed to make the following hardware revisions to
Building 6:
A. Change the exit devices to fire-rated type.
B. Add closers at Doors 31 and 32 to comply with label requirements.
C. Change hinges to ball bearing type-
D. Add closer and smr8ce seal to Door 48 to comply with label req=emnts.
The above changes were requested by the Districts and not included in the
Contract. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor Pursuant to
Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 15)
ADDED COST THIS CHANCE CROER ITEM: $ 1,257.00
TIME EXTEISICN THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
It= 25 - BUILDINGS 7 LIC$lING UPGRADE
The Contractor was directed to remove and replace the existing light fixtures in
Building 7 in order to install the new fire resistant drywall ceiling. It was
also necessary to upgrade the fixtures, conduit and connectors to meet code for an
explosion-proof installation, as required by the City of Fountain Valley w"l,t'
Department. This additional work was not covered in the Contract and was
accomplished by Contractor's force account Pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the
General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: - $ 11,216.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 10 Calendar Days
11U-9" AGENDA ITEM #17(b) (4) (a) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-9"
COUNTY SANITATION DI=CTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 10 of 15
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 EI.I.TC AVENUE
FaINIAIN VALLEY, CALMI OUA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Seven (7)
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberta Corporation DATE November 14, 1990
JOB: FMIUMCX S AND MAETPE[vT.NG E BUILDING AND OII. STORAGE AND DISPENSING
II VEMEPIIS. .TCB NO. J-20
Item 26 - FLOOR TILE AND CARPET ADDITION FM BUILDING 6
The Contractor was directed to add vinyl flooring in the iron's shower room
entrance hallway and carpet in the hallway adjacent to the library. The finish
schedule on the Contract Drawings did not designate numbers or finishes for these
hallway areas in Building 6. This item of work was acconpL shed by Contractor's
force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions.
(Reference PCH 15)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 982.00
TIME EXTENSION TEES CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 27 - KITCHEN CABINET ADDITIONS FOR BUILDING 6
The Contractor was directed to increase the depth of the cabinets and add a soffit
in the kitchen in Building 6. The depth of the cabinets were increased from 24
inches to 2R inches in order to provide enough clearance for the sink and range
top. A 6-inch high soffit was required to fill in the area between the top of the
cabinets and the kitchen ceiling. The Contract Drawings specified 24-inch deep
cabinets with no provisions for a soffit. This item of work was accomplished by
Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General
. Provisions. (Reference: PCH 15)
ADDED COED THIS CHANGE ORDER IM: $ 1,743.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 17EM: 1 Calendar Day
Item 28 - REDESIGN OF SUSPENDED ( MIN c IN BUILDING 5
The Contractor was directed to change the light fixture layout in Roan 103 of
Building 5 in order to avoid interference between the light fixtures and the fire
sprinkler piping. The suspended ceiling framing had to be reworked in order to
reposition the light fixtures. The Contract Drawings did not show the
interference. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account
pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 15)
ADDED COST THIS CM-XE ORDER ITEM: $ 101.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER IT04; 0 Calendar Days
"U-l0" AGENDV ITEM #17(b)(4)(a) - ALL DISTRICTS
UJIP71Y SAPDIAT UN DISIMUUIS OF' UKPIfZ CUfNIrY Yage 11 or 1]
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 Er-1.1a AVENUE
FLXN7l1IIN VALLEY, CALIFO A 92708 -
CHANGE ORDER
- C. O. NO. Seven (7)
ccanvL.IOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE November 14. 1990 ems'
JOB: SOkRKHIXISE AND NQmIIPPE[@1 rE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING
IMPRCVEMT , JOB NO. J-20
Its 29 - EXTENDED OVERHEAD
The Contractor has submitted a claim to the Districts for its costs of extended
overhead due to delays in contract construction progress caused by errors and
omission in the contract documents. C retractor has claimed costs of $534.48 per
day for 196 days for a total of $104,758.08. Districts' staff has negotiated for
an agreed amount of $534.48 per day for 145 days for a total of $77,499.60.
Included in the daily overhead costs are salaries for Contractor supervisory
personnel and secretary, vehicle expenses, office trailer and equipment rental,
office supplies, telephone, chemical toilet rental, disposal bins and insurance.
Shia item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section
10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST IBIS CHANGE ORDER ISPM: $ 77,499.60
ME EXSENSION ME CHANGE ORDER rM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 30 - ELEVATOR GLIDE RAIL SUPPORT BRACKETS
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install eight elevator guide rail
support brackets for Building 6 in order to attach the two elevator guide rails
to the concrete tilt-up walls inside the elevator shaft. Details on the brackets
were not shown on the Contract structural drawings and it was necessary for the
project structural engineer to prepare additional drawings in order for the
Contractor to have the steel brackets fabricated. This item of work was
accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the
General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 14)
ADDED COST' THIS CHANGE CRUM =: $ 4,505.00
TINE EX'ffiLSION THIS CHANGE ORDER I'1BM: 2 Calendar Days
Item 31 - GAS SUPPLY AND DRAIN CONNECTION FOR BUILDING 4
The Contractor was directed to furnish and .install a 3/4-inch gas supply and
1-inch condensation drain line to serve the air conditioning system installed on
the roof of Huilding 4. This work consisted of connecting the 3/4-itch gas line
to the Districts existing 3-inch law, pressure gas line adjacent to the building
and extending the 1-inch coadeasate drain line into a new 12-inch x 12-inch
concrete drain box installed on the south side of the building. The gas line
connection and drain box were not shown on the Contract Drmangs or included in
the Contract Specifications. This item of work was aacceplished by Contractor's
force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions.
(Reference: FC0 36) _
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE CRDEER ITEM: $ 2,654.00
ME EXS7 NSION THIS CHANGE ORDER rMl 0 Calendar Days
"U-11" AGENDA ITEM #17(b)(4)(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "U 11
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 12 of 15
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 FXT.TR AVENM
BOuuNIAIN VALLEY, allXEC RM 92708
CHANCE ORDER
C. O. NO. Seven (7)
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE Novenber 14. 1990
JOB:—WAREHOUSE AND NIIiIIN UNM BMDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING
IMPEDVEMENM, JOB NO. J-20
Item 32 - AIR IJ1E TO BUILDING 5
The Contractor was directed to install an additional 2-inch compressed air line
from shop Building B to Building 5. This change consisted of excavating,
furnishing and install;g black iron pipe and fittings, wrapping, back filling and
pressure testing. The new air line was requested by the Districts and was not
included in the contract. This item of work was accauplished by Contractor's
force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(B) of the General Provisions.
(Reference: BOO 33)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,689.00
TIME EXTELSICN THIS CHANGE CIDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days
Item 33 - ADDITICNAL PAVING AT BUILDING 4
The Contractor was directed to add an additional 4,228 square feet of asphalt
paving and aggregate base adjacent to Building 4. This was required in order to
replace badly deteriorated wasting asphalt paving around the new, building. The
Contract Drawings did not show these additional areas as receiving new asphalt
paving. A credit was received fc : 2,569 square feet of new paving deleted
adjacent to Pnilrlinge 2 and 6. The costs of an additional move-in for the paving
crew to pave around Building 8 are also included in this item. This item of work
was ac=qlished by_Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of
the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: $ 8,043.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 3 Calendar Days
Iten 34 - BUILDINGS 5 AND 6 STAIR PAN ADDITION
The Contractor was directed to fabricate and install a 16-gauge galvanized metal
stair pan at the top of seven stairways in B'ildi g 5 and 6. The stair pans ware
necessary in order to contain the poured-in-place concrete second floor where it
meets the top of each stair. No detail was provided in the Contract Drawings for
this condition. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force aocount
pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: FM 35)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE CODER T M: $ 2,013.00
TIME EXT.T3NSION THIS CHANCE ORDER IT E14: 1 Calendar Day
"U-12" AGENDA ITEM #17(b)(4)(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-12"
COUNW SANTTATICN DISTRICTS OF CHANGE COUNTY Page 13 of 15
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 RUN AVENUE �J
FO[IIdtAIN VALLEY, allZEaUUA 92708
CHANGE CIDER
C. O. NO. Seven (7)
CONrRACTCR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE November 14. 1990
.. JOB: WAREHO SE AND NPM1TEMNCE SUING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING
IIEF,OVEMUM, JOB N0. J-20
Item 35 - FIRE SPRINiMER PIPING PAINTING CREDIT
The Districts agreed to accepts credit to the Contract in exchange for the
Contractor not being required to Paint the fire sprinkler piping in Building 4,
existing Shop Buildings A, B and Vehicle Maintenance Shop. The Contract
Specifications required all piping to be painted. Painting deleted is for fire
sprinkler piping installed on the interior of enclosed buildings and not subject
to exterior corrosion. This item of cork was negotiated with the Contractor
pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions.
DEDU= CC1S'T THIS CHATS ORDER ITEM: ($ 8,086.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 36 - CREDIT FCR WORF ENCBCS AND STOOLS
The Districts -creed to accept a credit to the Contract in exchange for the
Contractor not being required to furnish workbenches and stools for Building 6 as
required by the Contract SpecLficatirms. The Districts will purchase the
workbenches and stools directly from the manufactures in order to obtain specified
features not available from the Contractor's supplier. This item of work was
negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General
Provisions.
CREDIT TEES CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($ 12,000.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calmidar Days
Item 37 - ILL EXPENSE
The contractor was required to compensate the Districts for legal fees charged by
the Districts for review and processing of the excessive amount of stop notices
filed against the project. This it® of work was negotiated with the Contractor
pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions.
CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($ 2,000.00)
TIME EXTENSIC THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"U-13" AGENDA ITEM #17(b) (4) (a) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-13"
COUNTY SANrnkTICN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COMITY Page 14 of 15
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 n?f,T,TS AVENUE
FOUNnUN VALLEY, CALIECRaA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Seven (7)
CGTITRACiOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE Novenber 14. 1990
JOB: VW('HOUSE AND MINIENANCE BUILDING AND O= S10RAGE AND DISPENSING
II4REDVfiMM, JOB NO. J-20
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 204,087.60
TOML TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE CREEK: 145 Calendar Days
The additional work container) within this Change Order can be perfonmed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 145 days' extension
of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no
direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or
damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted
and approved by this Chanute Order.
SlID -PM OF SALT TIM
Original Contract Date February 27, 1989
Original Contract Time 240 Calendar Days
Original Conpletion Date October 24, 1989
Time Extension this C.O. 145 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 196 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 1436 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date May 8, 1990
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 3.266.000.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 267,824.34
This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 204,087.60
Amended Contract Price $ 3,737,911.94
"U-14" AGENDA ITEM #17(b)(4)(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-14"
COM72Y SAMnMCN Dismicr5 CF ORANM COUNTY. Page 15 of.15..
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 SGLIS AVENUE 1
Fa NnUn VALLEY, aMUXRM 92708 �a.r
CHANGE SEDER
C. O. NO. Seven (7)
CCNIRFY.TOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE November 14. 1990
JOB: WARE== AND MAIUMMNCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING
nVROVE ENTS. JCB NO. J-20
Board Authorization Date: November 14, 1990
COUNTY SANPIIITICN DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE amurY, CA7.TFCFUUA
SU@IITI'ED BY: FdXX244K= BY:
/o RR/90 �• � /o-u-yo
ineer Date Construction Manager Date
APPFDVM AS TO FORM:
2a:Engineering to General Counsel Date
J. R. OORPORATT@1
Contractor Date
11U-15" AGENDA ITEM #17(b) (4) (a) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-15"
CO[ M SAWTATICN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 0£ 2
P. O. Box 8127 - 10844 ELL IS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIECRM 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Eight (81
CONPFP.CTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE November 14, 1990
JOB: WARffiiDI1SE AND KkINTENANM BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING
IMPROVEMENTS, JOB W. J-20
Amount of this Change Order (Acid) (Deduct) $ (57,500.001
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or cm,ti:are work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 - LIQm'D= DAMAGES
The Contractor is assessed liquidated damages in the contract-specified amount of
$500.00 per day for the total number of days work that the contract csas completed
beyond the contract-specified time of completion. The time subject to liquidated
damages is 115 calendar days, assessed pursuant to Section 6-6 of the General
Provisions.
DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (57,500.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ (57,500.00)
TOM TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
SU*1ARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date February 27, 1989
Original Contract Time 240 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date October 24, 1989
Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 196 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 436 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date May 8, 1990
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages 115 Calendar Days
Actual Final Completion Date August 31, 1990
"V-1" AGENDA ITEM #17(b)(4)(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "V-1"
COUNTY SA*Ti' MCN DISPRICTS OF CRARM 00 ?rY Page 2 of 2
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 FLUB AVMM
PalWaN VALLEY, t2r.TmrmMA 92708
CERM ORDER
C. O. NO. Right (8)
C@IT AMM: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE November 14, 1990
JOB: WAPEB = AND MAn=MNCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AMID DISPERSING
IMPROVEMENTS, JOB NO. J-20
Original Contract Price $ 3,266,000.00
Prev. ADth. Changes $ 471,911.94
This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ (57,500.001
Amended Contract Price $ 3,680,411.94
Board-Authorization Date: November 14, 1990
DLtA41GB COSNIR, CALZZIMA.
SUBMPPl'ED BY: ROC911MMM BY:
�, a 2R 90 A. lo_u_Pe
to C&struction Manager Date
APPROVED AS 10 F0M:
2J f
of Engineering Date General Counsel Date
J. R. : W C�y/MCN
�( '��
Contractor Date
"V-2" AGENDA ITEM #17(b) (4)(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "V-2"
CWNTY SANrrnmrCN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COMM Page 1 of 2
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FO[AQ= VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. Nine (91
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE November 14, 1990
JOB: {ERCUSE AND MAIN1'IIMNCE BMDDNGG, AND OIL STOFAM AND DISPENSING
IMPROVEMENTS, JM No. J-20
Anount of this Change Order (Add) (Asduet) $ 32,463.50
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby anrV.rn;oaa and as ccupensation therefor, the
following additions to the contract price are hereby approved.
ADJUSTMEM OF ENGU ERR I S ODUTFITIES
ADD:
Change in
Item ntity
No. Unit Description F= To Difference
A C.Y. Crushed Rock 0 1,007 1,007 @ $14.50 = $ 14,601.50
B C.Y. Crushed Rock 0 1,007 1,007 @ $16.00 = 16,112.00
C C.Y. Crushed Rock 0 100 100 @ $17.50 = 1,750.00
SUB'IOM = $ 32,463.50
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 32,463.50
TIMB EXMMICN TffiS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
SUMMARY OF CONTR#.T TIME
Original Contract Date February 27, 1989
Original Contract Time 240 Calendar Days
Original Cwgletion Date October 24, 1989
Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Tice Extension 196 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 436 Calendar Days
Revised Final Coupletion Due Date May 8, 1990
Time Subject to Iaquidated Damages 115 Calendar Days
Actual Final CaTletion Date August 31, 1990
W-1" AGENDA ITEM #17(b)(4)(C) - ALL DISTRICTS "W-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 2
P. O. HOX 8127 - 10844 811rc AVENUE
FOMWaN VALLEY, CALUKRUA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Nine (91
CONTRACTOR. J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE Nwenber 14, 1990
JOB: NARMO SE AND DAUNT= BUILDING AND OIL SIORMM AND DISPENSING
IMPROVEMENTS, JOB NO. J-20
Original Contract Price $ 3,266,000.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 414,411.94
This Change (Add) (Tladuct) $ 32,463.50
AmgrxlBd Contract Price S_3,712,875.44
Board Authorization Date: Noveuixer 14, 1990
COUNTY sn+*Tn'n'ATION DISTRICTS OF
cpmGz COIPIPY, CALM
SOEMPTTED BY: RECOMMENDED BY:
eer to 'Canstru d w Manager Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
zL 9J
Director Of 15ato General Counsel
J. R. RaMM COREKW=CN
SY J�Contractor Dike
"W-z" AGENDA ITEM #17(b)(4) (C) - ALL DISTRICTS "W-p^
RESOLUTION NO. 90-172
ACCEPTING JOB NO. J-20 AS COMPLETE
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
ACCEPTING WAREHOUSE AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING AND
OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING IMPROVEMENTS, JOB
NO. J-20, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL
CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO 'HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That, except as set forth in Section 5 hereof, the contractor,
J. R. Roberts Corporation, has completed the construction in accordance with the
terms of the contract for Warehouse and Maintenance Building and Oil Storage and
Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20, on August 31, 1990; and,
Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Director of Engineering has
recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with
the terms of the contract, except as set forth in Section 5 hereof, which said
recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 3. That Warehouse and Maintenance Building and oil Storage and
Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20, is hereby accepted as completed in
accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated February 27, 1989,
except as set forth in Section 5 hereof; and,
Section 4. That the Districts' Director of Engineering is hereby
authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with J. R. Roberts
Corporation, setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Warehouses
and Maintenance Building and Oil Storage and Dispensing Improvements, Job
"X-1" AGENDA ITEM #17(b) (4)(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "X-1"
No. J-20, and assessing the contractor for liquidated damages for 115 days from
May 8, 1990, the contractual completion date, to August 31, 1990, the actual
date of completion of work by the contractor, in the amount of $500.00 per day, l` -
for the total amount of $57,500, as provided in the plans and specifications for
said contract, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General
Counsel ; and,
Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for
itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 14, 1990.
"X72" AGENDA ITEM #17(b) (4) (d) - ALL DISTRICTS "X-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 9D-173
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR JOB NO. J-2 -1
`..►� A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S. 6, 7,
11. 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTROL CENTER/OPERATIONS
AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING, JOB NO. J-23-1
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers, Districts' engineers,
have completed preparation of the plans and specifications for construction of
Control Center/Operations and Maintenance Building, Job No. J-23-1.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the proposed project for construction of Control
Center/Operations and, Maintenance Building, Job No. J-23-1, is hereby approved.
Said project was included in the Program Environmental Impact Report on the
1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan approved on
July 19, 1989. A Notice of Determination was filed by the Secretary on July 20,
1989, in accordance with the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and,
Section 2. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents
this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by Brown and Caldwell Consulting
Engineers, Districts' engineers, for construction of Control Center/Operations
and Maintenance Building, Job No. J-23-1, are hereby approved and adopted; and,
Section 3. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for
bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Public Contracts Code of
the State of California; and,
Section 4. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date
"Y-1" AGENDA ITEM #18(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "Y-1"
and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and,
Section 5. That the Secretary and the Districts' Director of Engineering
or his designee be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of
Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 14, 1990.
"Y-2" AGENDA ITEM M10)(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "Y-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 90-176
AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 14-1-2
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NOS. 7 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
�i CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR BAKER FORCE MAINS,
FROM MAIN STREET PUMP STATION TO BRISTOL STREET,
CONTRACT NO. 14-1-2
* * k * * * * * k * k k k k k
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 7 and 14 of
Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the proposed construction contract is for a project which
Is included in the Supplement No. 1 to the Environmental Impact Report for
Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed
Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13. In
accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended,
and Section 15090 of the Districts' Guidelines, the Final Supplement No. 1 to
the Environmental Impact Report was approved on July 11, 1990; and,
Section 2. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the
Boards of Directors by the Districts' Director of Engineering that award of
contract be made to Mladen Buntich Construction Co. , Inc. for Baker Force Mains,
from Main Street Pump Station to Bristol Street, Contract No. 14-1-2, and bid
tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered
filed; and,
Section 3. That the contract for Baker Force Mains, from Main Street Pump
Station to Bristol Street, Contract No. 14-1-2, be awarded to Mladen Buntich
Construction Co. , Inc. in the total amount of $5,773,395.00, in accordance with
the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and,
Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 14, acting for
"Z-1" AGENDA ITEM #33(b) - DISTRICTS 7 & 14 "Z-1"
itself and as agent for District No. 7, are hereby authorized and directed to '
enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work, pursuant to
-the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the
General Counsel ; and,
Section 5. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 14, 1990.
"Z-2" AGENDA ITEM #33(b) - DISTRICTS 7 & 14 "Z-2"
October 23, 1990 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
u 11:00 a.m. of ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA
NO ADDENDA
n.a ear e127
B I D T A B U L A T I O N w„Md„�, Y.eu 9e7Pe�61 e7
S H E E T n.aeeesn,
CONTRACT NO. 14-1-2
PROJECT TITLE Baker Force Mains. from Main Street Pump Station to Bristol St.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Construction of dual 42-inch force mains
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $7.OM 1990-1991 $4.OM - District 14
BUDGET AMOUNT $1.5M - District 7
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
1. Mladen Buntich Const. Co., Inc., Sunland, CA $5,773,395.00*
2. S. A. Healy Co. & Assoc., Azusa, CA $5,840,000.00
3. W. H. Ebert Corp., San Jose, CA $5,997,210.00
4. Silveri & LeBouef JV, Anaheim, CA $6,104,669.00
5. Hood Corporation, Whittier, CA $6,323,000.00
6. Colich & Sons (JV), Gardena, CA $6,345,591.00
7. Peter C. David Co., Inc., Laguna Hills, CA $6,349,000.00
8. Kenko Inc., dba McGrand & Assoc., Calimesa, CA $6,390,190.00
9. K.E.C. Company, Corona, CA $6,455,766.00
10. Mike Prlich & Sons, South El Monte, CA $6,524,983.00
11. Cornish Construction Company, Inc. , Glen Avon, CA $6,700,000.00
12. Steve Bubalo Const. Co., Monrovia, CA $6,755,755.00
13. Aman Bros., Inc., Covina, CA $7,336,676.00
14. Steve P. Rados, Inc. , Santa Ana, CA $7,504,028.00
15. BRH-Garver, Inc., Houston, TX $7,999,850.00
*Corrected total, mathematical error.
I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the
low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Mladen Buntich
Const. Co., Inc. in the bid amount of $5,77 95.00 the lowest and best bid.
6o&mas M. Dawes
Director of Enaineerino
"Z-3- AGENDA ITEM #33(b) - DISTRICTS 7 & 14 "Z-3"
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 39 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
ON
OCTOBER 10, 1990
y 51�elWe pie Oly
Slear ISSN .
oR9Nce co �
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, S. 6. 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on October 10, 1990,
at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of
Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present
for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as fallows:
ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
DISTRICT N0. 1: x James A. . Puck, Chairman RGrossich Crank
=Charles E. Puckett. Chairmen pro tam —Richard B. Edgar
-7--Dan Griset —Dan Young
=Roger Stanton —Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 2: a Iry Pickier, Chairman Fred Hunter
x James Neal, Chai me pro ten —George Scott
Roland E. Biganger 7--Henry W. Wedaa
=A.B. -Buck- Catlin _Chris Herby
-7--Dan Griset _Dan Young
=Willi am D. Mahoney _Beth Graham
=Robert H. Main Norman Culver
Carrey Nelson x_Wayne Wedin
=Arthur G. Newton _Norman Z. Eckenrode
xWayne Siizel - Harold Saldarini
=Don E. Smith —Fred Barrera
=Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 3: x Richard Polis, Chai moan _Eva G. Miner
=J.R. -Bob- Siefen, Chai man pro ten _Dewey Wiles
-7--Edward L. Allen David J. Shawver
7--Margaret M. Arnold —Cecilia L. Age
Wes Bannister x_Peter Green
7--A.B. -Buck' Catlin Chris Norby
=Norman Culver --Robert H. Main
7--Beth Graham _William D. Mahoney
-7—Don R. Griffin Donna L. Chessen
xOan Griset —_Dan Young
x James Neal George Scott
Carrey Nelson =Mayne Wedin
a Iry Pickier Fred Hunter
7--Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
z Charles Sylvia _Robert Wahlstrom
=Edna Wilson Frank Laszlo
DISTRICT NO. 5: Evelyn Hart, Chairman x Ruthelyn Plummer
=Phil Sansone, Chairman pro ten x John C. Cox, Jr.
=Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 6: x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman _Evelyn Hart
A James A. Wahner, Chairman pro tem James M. Ferryman
z Don R. Roth —Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 7: x Don E. Smith, Chairman Fred Barrera
=Richard Edgar, Chairman pro tam —_Charles E. Puckett
%John C. Cox, Jr. Ruthelyn Plummer
=Dan Griset —Dan Young
=Don R. Roth —Roger Stanton
=Sally Anne Sheridan Barry Hammond
z James A. Wahner _Harry Green
DISTRICT NO. 11: Grace Winchell, Chairman x Peter Green
a Tom Mays, Chairmen pro tam —Jim Silva
x Roger Stanton —Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 13: x Henry W. Media, Chairmen _Roland E. Bigonger
x Wayne Wedin, Chairman pro tam Carrey Nelson
a Iry Pickier —Fred Hunter
x Don R. Roth —Roger Stanton
x Don E. Smith _Fred Barrera
DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chairman _Darryl Miller
xSally Anne Sheridan, Chairman pro tem Barry Hammond
-7—Leslie A. Pontious —Richard B. Edgar
�✓ =Dan R. Roth —Roger Stanton
=Don E. Smith _Fred Barrera
-2
10/10/90
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager,
Rita J. Brown, Board Secretary, Thomas
M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Corinne
Clawson, Penny Kyle, Ed Hodges, Jahn
Linder, Charles Nichols, Jack Vincent,
Chuck Winsor, Patti Gorczyca, Gary
Hasenstab, Irwin Haydock, Steve Hovey,
Jo Klak, Mark Esquer, Chloe Dao
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel ,
Clark Ide, Jim Kennedy, Bill
Dobberpuhl , Wayne Milner, Donna
Rovero, John Masek, Charles W. Parret,
Allan Porush, Udarp Patil , Carol
Herrera, Charles Wilson, Duane Jensen,
Larry H. Allsup, Dennis Wood, Mary
Lee, Ran Eguchi , Jan Decker, Mark
Briggs, Arshud Mahmood, Greg Salzano,
Tom Lane, Tom Richardson
x x x x x x x x x x x x x
ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Catlin reported that
Report of the Joint Chairman the Fiscal Policy Comnittee was
scheduled to meet on Wednesday,
October 17th, at 5:30 p.m.
He also noted that a Joint Works Selection Committee was scheduled to meet
on Wednesday, October 24th, at 4:30 p.m. �✓
The Joint Chairman then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for
Wednesday, October 24th, at 5:30 p.m. , and invited Director John C. Cox, Jr.
to attend and participate in the discussions.
Chairman Catlin also reported that the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse
Committee was scheduled to meet on Thursday, October 25th, at 5:30 p.m.
Mr. Catlin added that the Building Comnittee was scheduled to meet on
Tuesday, October 30th, at 5:30 p.m.
ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager commented on a
Report of the General Manager cotton tote bag included in the
Directors' folders from Pima Gro
Systems, a firm currently contracting with the Districts for removal and
disposal of the Districts' sludge. He noted that Pima Gro applies the
sludge directly to agricultural land used for growing crops such as cotton.
Mr. Sylvester also called the Directors' attention to a letter he wrote to
"Earth Alert! ", an environmental organization, in response to an inaccurate
article published in their Spring 1990 Bulletin containing rather blatant
misrepresentations regarding the County Sanitation Districts of Orange
County wastewater management program. _
-3-
10/10/90
ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel announced that
Report of the General counsel later in the meeting the Boards would
be adjourning to a closed session
relative to personnel matters and matters of litigation at which time he
would report further on certain items.
Mr. Woodruff then reviewed his Annual Report to the Boards of Directors
relative to the status of pending litigation. He noted that many of the
claims and cases listed in the report are several years old, and many were
defended by various construction contractors. Consequently, the Districts
were not required to become too involved in these claims. He commented
that, historically, the Districts have experienced a very nominal amount of
litigation, and, in fact, this low frequency is much better than average for
public agencies.
DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held September 12,
1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held September 12,
1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held September 12,
1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held September 12, _
1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held September 12,
1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held September 12,
1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held September 12,
1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held September 12,
1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
�/ -4-
10/10/90
DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held September 12,
1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratification of payment of Joint
and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual
District claims set forth on pages
"A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized
below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts
so indicated.
9/12/90 9/26/90
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - $ 591,412.70 $1,209,348.62
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 279,608.30 521,753.37 -
Joint Working Capital Fund - 128,898.79 228,322.97
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 100,224.16 20,230.52
DISTRICT NO. 1 - 2,891.06 970.53
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 10,593.50 481,683.16
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 13,705.35 29,449.66
DI TRI— C� - 41,354.39 19,056.60
DISTRICT NO. - -0- 784.75
DISTRICT NO. 7 - 13,839.30 41,065.66
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 746.83 11,048.64
DIDI TRIG - -0- 123.12
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 892.37 3,384.80
DISTRICT NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 20.27 13,388.62
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 3,359.07 -0-
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 9.03 4,543.65
1,187,555.12 2,590,154.67
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awarding Purchase of Microcomputer
Hardware, Software and Associated That the bid tabulation and
Peripherals, .Specification recommendation re award of purchase
No. E-191, to various firms order contracts for Purchase of
Microcomputer Hardware, Software and
Associated Peripherals, Specification No. E-191, be, and is hereby, received
and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase order contracts for 23 systems be, and
are hereby, awarded to the following vendors, for a total amount not to _
exceed $82,515.35 plus sales tax:
Category Vendor Amount
Hardware Action Software $ 5,241.00
Software CoastTech Computer 2,523.00
Hdwr/Sftwr - Computer Bay 7,823.00
Hdwr/Sftwr Inacomp Computer Centers 8,694.00
Hdwr/Sftwr Kalleen' s Computer Products, Inc. 5,440.00
Hdwr/Sftwr LB & Associates 5,898.35
Hdwr/Sftwr Microage - Fountain Valley 41,476.00
Hdwr/Sftwr Microage Computer Center 5,420.00
(Santa Ana) $82,515.35
-5-
10/10/90
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awardin -Blue rintin Photocopying
an Related Services S 2cification That the bid tabulation and
No. 5-046 Revised to Banana recommendation re award of purchase
u Blueprint, Inc. order contract for Blueprinting,
Photocopying and Related Services,
Specification No. 5-046 (Revised) , be, and is hereby, received and ordered
filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase order contract be, and is hereby, awarded
to Banana Blueprint, Inc. for a one-year period beginning October 15, 1990,
for a gross annual amount not to exceed $118,060.56 plus sales tax, with
provision for four one-year extensions.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 2 to
Purchase Order No. 34691 issued to That staff be, and is hereby,
Office Pavilion Interior Resources authorized to issue Change Order
Fe Job-No. J-7-5 No. 2 to Purchase Order No. 34691
Issued to Office Pavilion/Interior
Resources for Purchase and Installation of Administration Building Interior
Office Partitioning Systems and Furnishings, Job No. J-7-5, increasing the
total authorized amount from $966,855.53 plus sales tax to an amount not to
exceed $1,005,427.60 plus sales tax, for added storage and transport costs
re interior office partitioning systems and furnishings pending completion
of new Districts' facilities.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving hange Order No. 1 to the
laps and s ecifications for That Change Order No. 1 to the plans
Job No. J-19- and specifications for Central Power
Generation System at Treatment Plant
No. 2, Job No. J-19-2, authorizing an addition of $30,183.44 to the contract
with Brinderson Corporation for five items of additional work, be, and is
hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 2 to the
plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 2 to the plans
Jab No. J-24 and specifications for Installation
of Replacement Influent Meters, Job
No. J-24, authorizing a net addition of $3,503.44 to the contract with
P. R. Burke Industrial Corporation for four items of additional work or
deletions, and granting a time extension of 20 calendar days for completion
of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Accepting Job No. J-24 as complete
That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 90-137, accepting Installation of Replacement Influent
Meters, Jab No. J-24, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of
Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
-6-
10/10/90
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 6 to the
plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 6 to the plans
Job No. P1-33 and specifications for Primary
Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related
Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33, authorizing an
addition of $23,000.00 to the contract with Gust K. Newberg Construction
Company for one item of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
ADproving hange Drder No. 3 t0 the
plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 3 to the plans
Job No. P1-44-1 and specifications for Gas Handling
Facilities at Reclamation Plant
No. 1, Job No. P1-34-1, authorizing a net addition of $9,644.00 to the
contract with Ziebarth & Alper for three items of additional work or _
deletions, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 5 to the
plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 5 to the plans
Job No. P1-34-2 and specifications for Sludge
Handling Facilities at Reclamation
Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-2, authorizing an addition of $32,309.00 to the
contract with Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. for
one Item of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the Selection Committee
to ne otiate Adtlentlum No. 1 to the That the Selection Committee be, and
Professional ervices Agreement is hereby, authorized to negotiate
with John Carollo En sneers re Addendum No. 1 to the Professional
design of ab Nos. P1-3 and P2-4 Services Agreement with John Carollo
Engineers for design and
construction services, preparation of operations and maintenance manuals,
and training services re Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1,
Job No. P1-36, and Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-42, to provide for additional design services necessary to replace
and realign existing 78-inchocean outfall and modify existing scum
collection system.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Profsnal Services
Agreement wites
h J. Tio. Horvath & That the Selection Committee
Associates for specialized certification of the final
construction management and negotiated fee relative to the
Inspection services re various Professional Services Agreement with
master-planned construction J. T. Horvath & Associates for
projects specialized construction management
and inspection services re various
master-planned construction projects, be, and is hereby, received, ordered
filed and approved; and,
-7-
10/10/90
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution
No. 90-139, approving said agreement with J. T. Horvath 8 Associates for
said services, on an as-needed basis, for a two-year period beginning
October 11, 1990, at the following hourly rates, plus direct expenses at
cost:
Agreement Period Hourly Rate
10/11/90 - 10/10/91 $ 35.00
10/11/91 - 10/10/92 37.50
Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Professional Services
Agreement with K. P. Lindstrom, That the Selection Committee
Inc. for environmental consulting certification of the final
services negotiated fee relative to the
Professional Services Agreement with
K. P. Lindstrom, Inc. for environmental consulting services to assist staff
on NPDES Permit activities; regulatory and legislative liaison activities;
and for technical support for sludge management, air quality, reclamation
and conservation issues and in connection with CEQA compliance for Master
Plan projects, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution
No. 90-140, approving said agreement with K. P. Lindstrom, Inc. for said
services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor including overhead and profit
plus direct expenses and subconsultant fees, for a total amount not to
exceed $164,500.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a
part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Author zing the Selection Commit ee
to negotiate a Professional That the Selection Committee be, and
Services A reement wi Ecos stems is hereby, authorized to negotiate a
En ineer n Anal sesth for Professional Services Agreement with
ecolo Ica consulting and Ecosystems Engineering 8 Analyses
s a stical a a analyses services for ecological consulting and
statistical data analyses services.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing Grant of Easement to
Southern Ca fornia Edison Company That the Boards of Directors hereby
for right-of-way required to adopt Resolution No. 90-141,
operate and maintain electrical approving and authorizing execution
equipment providing electrical of a Grant of Easement to Southern
power to Job Nos. Jos. J�23-1 California Edison Company for
right-of-way required to operate and
maintain Southern California Edison's equipment which will provide
electrical power to the new Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17, now under
construction and the new Control Center/Operations and Maintenance Building,
Job No. J-23-1, now under design. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is
hereby made a part of these minutes.
-8-
10/10/90
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
pproving agreement w th ity of
Newport Beach granting an easement That the Boards of Directors hereby
to the City re City water line adopt Resolution No. 90-142,
through Treatment Plant No. 2 approving and authorizing execution
of an agreement with the City of
Newport Beach granting an easement to the City required in connection with
construction of and access to a 30-inch City water line through Treatment
Plant No. 2 from the Santa Ana River property line to Brookhurst Street, in
exchange for a Quitclaim Deed from the City to the Districts, quitclaiming
the City's interest in a previous water line easement which also crosses
Plant No. 2. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of
these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re Professional Services
Agreement with Dames 8 Moore to
conduct 51Ismic Stud em
P Elent of
Job Nos. P1- 8- and -43-2
Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering
briefly reviewed the scope of
work to be included in the proposed seismic study. He noted that the
consultant would investigate the Districts' existing structures and
provide recommendations for rehabilitation based on economic and risk
management criteria to reduce potential damage to the treatment plant
and pipeline facilities in the event of an earthquake. He also
advised that a full earthquake preparedness training program would be
Included in this proposed contract. Mr. Dawes noted that the Selection --
Committee had negotiated a fee for the studies in the amount of
$460,000.00 and that staff concurred with their recommendation.
The Joint Chairman referred to problems encountered in other areas
within the state and expressed his support of the Districts' plan to
move ahead in a positive direction to protect the treatment plants and
prepare for such an emergency.
Approving Professional Services Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Agreement
That the Selection Committee
certification of the final negotiated fee relative to the Professional
Services Agreement with Dames 8 Moore to conduct Seismic Study Element
of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job
No. PI-38-3, and Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to
Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-2, be, and is hereby,
received, ordered filed and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution -
No. 90-138, approving said agreement with Dames 8 Moore for said
services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct
expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not
to exceed $460,000.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby
made a part of these minutes.
../
-9-
10/10/90
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive file an a rove wr en
re art of he on se rvatian That the written report of the
Reclamation and Reuse Committee Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse
\.r Committee's meeting on September 27,
1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Amendment No. 1 to the
Agreement for Removal and Disposal That Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement
Reuse of Distrt cts' Residual So i s .for Removal and Disposal/Reuse of
with Pima Gro Systems, Inc. Districts' Residual Solids with Pima
Gro Systems, Inc. , providing for an
Increase 1n volume and a reduction in cost from $33.50 per wet ton to $28.75
per wet tan, be, and is hereby, approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to
execute said Amendment In form approved by the General Counsel .
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Amendment No. 4 to the
Agreement far Removal , Processing That Amendment No. 4 to the Agreement
and Disposal of Sewa�eolig with for Removal , Processing and Disposal
Recyc, Inc. of Sewage Solids with Recyc, Inc. ,
providing for a change in the method
of computing the cost for said services to "dollars per wet ton of solids
residuals removed", and establishing said cost at $23.00 per wet ton, be,
and is hereby, approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and .is hereby, authorized to
execute said Amendment in farm approved by the General Counsel .
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re Supplement No. 1 to
Program EIR for Collection,
Treatment and Disposal Facilities
Master Plan re Interplant Pipeline
and Utility Corridor, Job No. 1-9
Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering
reported that in 1989 the Boards
approved the updated Master Plan which provided for facilities
necessary to meet flow increases and regulatory discharge requirements
for the next 30 years. Also approved was an Environmental Impact
Report which addressed most of the master-planned projects. However,
three projects included in that document were only able to be addressed
in a general manner and were designated as needing further review and
additional CEQA documentation when the project was ready to begin the
design phase. The Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job
No. I-9. is one of those projects.
The project includes a new 120-inch sewer outfall that will deliver
treated effluent from Plant No. 1 to the ocean outfall booster stations
at Plant No. 2. Also included is utility piping and communication
cables. The cost of the project is estimated at $32 million.
-SO-
10/10/90
Mr. Dawes then reviewed the actions taken thus far with regard to CEQA
requirements. He advised that comments on the Draft Supplement No. 1
had been received from the State Water Resources Control Board, the
State of California Department of Transportation, County of Orange,
Mesa Consolidated Water District and the City of Tustin. These
comments have been addressed in the Final Supplement.
Public Hearing The Joint Chairman announced that
this was the time and place fixed
by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 for a public hearing on Draft Supplement No. 1
to Program EIR for Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master
Plan re Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9.
Open Public Hearing The Chairman declared the
hearing open at 7:55 p.m. -
Receive and file written comments Moved, seconded and duly
re Draft Supplement No. 1 to EIR carried:
That the written comments relative to Draft Supplement No. 1 to
EIR for Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan
re Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor,. Job No. I-9, be, and
are hereby, received and ordered filed.
Close hearing There being no oral public
comments, the Chairman
declared the hearing closed at 7:56 p.m.
Directin consultant to address Moved, seconded and duly carried:
written comments rice ved on Draft
Supplement No. 1 to EIR and prepare That the consultant be, and is
Final Su lenient No. 1 after close hereby, directed to address any
of the comment period on written or oral comments received
ctober 10, 1990 on the Draft Supplement No. 1 to
said EIR and to prepare the Final
Supplement No. 1 to Program Environmental Impact Report for Collection,
Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan re Interplant Pipeline
and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9, after the close of public comment
period on October 10, 1990.
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re Mitigated Negative
Declaration re Purchase of a Site
for a Wastewater Reclamation Plant
in the City of Fullerton
Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering
recalled that the 1989 Master
Plan and Program Environmental Impact Report included a "Potential
Water Reclamation Plants Reconnaissance Report". It reviewed 18 sites
and found three sites to be the most promising--Crescent Basin, Seal
Beach Naval Weapons Station and the Anaheim Forebay. The purpose of
the reclamation plants would be the production of water almost
comparable in quality to potable water systems for use in supplying
-11-
10/10/90
certain industrial needs, landscape irrigation, and groundwater
recharge. Mr. Dawes pointed out that the 5-3/4 acre parcel in the City
of Fullerton currently being considered is easterly of the Crescent
Basin site and is not one of the 18 parcels originally identified as it
became potentially available after the Master Plan was completed.
However, it is now the top-rated site. The Executive Committee and the
Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee have reviewed proposals
for the purchase of this site.
Staff reported that in order to prepare a purchase agreement for
consideration by the Directors, various onsite and offsite studies must
be conducted, including a geotechnical analysis with emphasis on
possible underground contamination. Mr. Dawes advised that Waste Water
Disposal Company (owners of the site) and the members of the Executive
Committee and Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee all agree
that a prepurchase agreement, outlining the conditions of sale,
Including price, should be entered into before additional funds are
expended for the onsite investigation. He noted the agreement will
provide that should contamination be found, it will be cleaned up to
the satisfaction of the applicable agencies with all cleanup costs born
by the seller.
It was further noted that since the results of the geotechnical studies
are necessary to prepare a complete program environmental impact
report, a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in
accordance with CEQA guidelines to allow the Districts to proceed with
the preparation of a prepurchase agreement. The Director of
Engineering advised that an Initial Study, Environmental Impact
Assessment and the Mitigated Negative Declaration have been noticed and
circulated, as required by CEQA guidelines. Comments were received
from the State of California Office of Planning and Research and the
Department of Transportation, and the City of Tustin.
Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Staff Report dated September 19, 1990 re Mitigated Negative
Declaration for said project, be, and is hereby, received and ordered
filed.
Receive and file Initial Study and Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Environmental Impact Assessment
That the Initial Study and
Environmental Impact Assessment be, and is hereby, received and ordered
filed.
/ -12-
10/10/90
Receive and file written comments Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the following written comments on said project be, and are hereby,
received and ordered filed:
City/Agency Dated
State of California, Office
of Planning and Research September 10, 1990
State of California, August 24, 1990
Department of Transportation,
District 12
City of Tustin August 16, 1990
Discussion/oral comments Directors discussed the proposed
site and expressed their concern
regarding any possible cleanup costs. Mr. Dawes assured the Boards
that the Districts had clearly specified that any cleanup required
would be the owner's responsibiity.
There were no oral public comments.
Approving Mitigated Negative Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Declaration and authorizing filing
of a Notice of Determination That the Boards of Directors
hereby adopt Resolution
No. 90-145, approving the Mitigated Negative Declaration and
authorizing filing of a Notice of Determination. Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and approve written
report of the Executive Committee That the written report of the
Executive Committee's meeting on
September 26, 1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing staff to participate
with representatives of other That staff be, and is hereby,
affected local public entities to authorized to participate with
obtain information re County's representatives of other affected
Pro ert Tax Administration Fee local public entities, including
proposed to a im lemented pursuant cities, special districts and the
to 56 557 County, to obtain information
- pertaining to the County's Property
Tax Administration Fee proposed to be implemented pursuant to SB 2557.
-13-
I., L.,..
ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel reviewed his
Opposing Proposi ion 1 8: The Memorandum to the Boards mailed with
allfornia nvi ronmental rotection the Directors' agenda material
Act of 1990 on the November 199 relative to Proposition 128. He
ballot reported that the Executive Committee
discussed this initiative at length
making several comments and suggestions relative to the Districts' position
recommended by the Executive Committee on the initiative and what actions
should be taken to Inform the public of the reasons for whatever position
the Boards might take. He then pointed out the legal limitations of public
agencies regarding expenditures of public monies re ballot measures.
Mr. Woodruff stated that it was certainly permissible to take a position on
this proposition, but the Districts could not expend public monies to
promote or publish materials that urge voters to take the same position as
the Districts' official position. However, information could be prepared
and disseminated simply itemizing the facts and findings of the Boards. He
reiterated. that the critical question was whether there is an expenditure of
public funds, and if so, the information provided must be absolutely
unbiased and not urge a particular action.
Directors then entered into a discussion relative to Proposition 128 and the
possible ways to inform the public of the Districts' position recommended by
the Executive Committee and the reasons therefor. It was pointed out that
although the Proposition is well-intended, it contains many provisions that
are extremely complex and technical and covers several unrelated subjects
which make it ill-suited for the initiative process. Many of the initiative
measures are not scientifically-based and are contradictory to existing
laws. If passed, the initiativb could cost the Districts' ratepayers
$50,000,000 per year which would more than double sewer rates.
Director Peter Green stated that he would like to go on record as supporting
Proposition 128 for a number of features it contained which, in his view,
outweighed the Districts' concerns.
The General Manager outlined the following public information program
discussed by the Executive Committee:
- Forward a copy of the Staff Report and Resolution No. 90-143, if
adopted, to appropriate cities and special districts within the County,
and the County of Orange
- Issue a press release
- Place newspaper ads
The Directors further discussed the issue and suggested voting separately
regarding the action to appose Proposition 128 and the proposed public
information program relative to any Districts' official position on said
proposition.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried by roll call vote:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-143, opposing
Proposition 128: The California Environmental Protection Act of 1990 on the
November 1990 ballot. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made
a part of these minutes.
Director Peter Green requested that his apposition to the motion be made a
matter of record.
-14-
10/10/90
FURTHER MOVED, seconded and duly carried by roll call vote:
That the Boards of Directors do hereby authorize and direct the staff to
distribute a copy of Resolution No. 90-143 and Information on the impact of �../
Proposition 128 to the Districts and their ratepayers, to the media,
including newspaper ads, public agencies in Orange County and others, as
deemed appropriate and allowable under applicable statutes.
Director Peter Green requested that his opposition to the motion be made a
matter of record.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the General Manager to
negotiate and issue a purchase That the General Manager be, and is
order contract for hereby, authorized to negotiate with
Replacement Upgrade of Northern Orange County suppliers of equipment
Telecom Telephone System Switch compatible with the Districts'
Equipment Specification No. E-1 2 telephone system and issue a purchase
order contract to the Northern
Telecom supplier with the lowest cost proposal for compatible equipment for
Replacement/Upgrade of Northern Telecom Telephone System Switch Equipment
(Specification No. E-192) , in an amount not to exceed $126,200.00 plus tax.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the General Manager to
issue apurchase order contract for That the General Manager be, and is
Video Production Services, hereby, authorized to issue a
Specification No. 5-047, to The purchase order contract for Video �.✓
Premium Group Production Services, Specification
No. 5-047, to The Premium Group for a
total amount not to exceed $32,925.00, to produce a new public information
video on the Districts' wastewater management program.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Amendment No. 11 to
Agreement for Employment of That the Boards of Directors hereby
General Counsel adopt Resolution No. 90-144,
approving Amendment No. 11 to
Agreement for Employment of General Counsel . Said resolution, by reference
hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Convene in closed session pursuant
To Government Code Sections 54956.9 The Boards convened in closed session
and 54957.6 at 8:16 p.m. pursuant to Government
Code Sections 54956.9 and 54957.6.
ALL DISTRICTS At 9:10 p.m. the Boards reconvened in
Reconvene in regular session regular session.
-15-
10/10/90
ALL DISTRICTS Upon return from closed session, it
Amendin lassif ca on an was reported by the Joint Chairman
om ensation Resolution No. 79-ZU, that it was appropriate to consider
as amended, re tieneral Manager's adoption of Resolution No. 90-152
salary regarding the General Manager's
salary.
Whereupon it was moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-152, amending
Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, re General
Manager's salary. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a
part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Upon return from closed session, the
A ravin settlement of case General Counsel reported on the action
No. X6048 , Butler Engineering, of the Boards of Directors in the
Inc. vs. county Sanitation matter of litigation entitled Butler
Districts of Orange county Engineering, Inc. vs. County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County,
Orange County Superior Court Case No. X604838, as follows:
It was moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the settlement of the litigation entitled Butler Engineering, Inc. vs.
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court
Case No. X604838, by the payment of the sum of $65,000 by the Districts to
Butler Engineering, Inc. in exchange for a Dismissal of Prejudice of the
pending litigation and agreement of the parties of no finding nor
acknowledgement of fault or responsibility by the Districts, be, and is
hereby, approved.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:12 p.m. , October 10, 1990.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Professional Services
Agreement with Willdan Associates That the Selection Committee
re project report for Contract certification of the final negotiated
No. 2-9-R1 fee relative to the Professional
Services Agreement with Willdan
Associates for preparation of a Project Report for Rehabilitation of Cypress
Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1, be, and is hereby, received,
ordered filed and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution
No. 90-146-2, approving said Professional Services Agreement with Willdan
Associates for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus
overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a
total amount not to exceed $35,080.00. Said resolution, by reference
hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
-16-
10/10/90
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:12 p.m. , October 10, 1990.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. to the
plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 1 to the plans
Contract NO. 3-3JR and specifications for Rehabilitation
of Manholes an Miller-Holder Trunk
Sewer, Contract No. 3-33R, authorizing a net addition of $21,067.00 to the
contract with Sancon Engineering, Inc. for three items of additional work or
deletions, be, and is hereby, approved.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:12 p.m., October 10, 1990.
DISTRICTS 5 & 6
Actions re Application for Leave to
File Late !aim submitted D
Comcast Ca levision re ontract
No. 5-29
Receive and file General Counsel 's Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Memorandum
That the General Counsel 's
Memorandum dated September 18, 1990, recommending denial of Application
for Leave to File Late Claim dated September 10, 1990 submitted by
Comcast Cablevision for alleged damages in connection with Replacement
of Portions of Coast Highway Force Main and Gravity Sewer, Contract
No. 5-29, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
Receive file and den A !ication Moved, seconded and duly carried:
for Leave to Ile Late Claim
That the Application for Leave to
File Late Claim dated September 10, 1990 submitted by Comcast
Cablevision for alleged damages in connection with Replacement of
Portions of Coast Highway Force Main and Gravity Sewer, Contract
No. 5-29, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chai man
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:12 p.m., October 10, 1990.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:12 p.m. , October 10, 1990.
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of Via✓
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:12 p.m. , October 10, 1990.
-17-
10/10/90
DISTRICTS 6, 7 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving ange Order No. 3 o he
l ans and s ec f ca ions re That Change Order No. 3 to the plans
ontrac No. 14-1-113 and specifications for Baker-Gisler
Interceptor, from Bristol Street to
Fairview Road, Contract No. 14-1-1B, authorizing an addition of $90.319.00
to the contract with Steve Bubalo Construction Co. for four items of
additional work, and granting a time extension of 13 calendar days for
completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. -
DISTRICTS 6, 7 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Chan a rder o. 4 o the
plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 4 to the plans
Contract No. 14-1-1B and specifications for Baker-Gisler
Interceptor, from Bristol Street to
Fairview Road, Contract No. 14-1-10, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's
quantities resulting in a net deduction of $28,641.00 from the contract with
Steve Bubalo Construction Co., be, and is hereby, approved.
DISTRICTS 6 7 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Accepting Con rac o. 14-1-1B as
complete That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 90-147,
accepting Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road,
Contract No. 14-1-1B, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of
Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICTS 6 1
7 8 14
Actions re adopt on of Resolution
`..r of Necessity to acquire ri ht-of-
way by eminent domain for on roc
No. 14-1-1A
Verbal report of General Counsel The Assistant General Counsel
recalled that at the September
Board meeting the Directors had adopted a resolution setting a public
hearing for October 10, 1990, relative to adoption of a Resolution of
Necessity to acquire right-of-way by eminent domain in order to
construct the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant
No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A. He briefly outlined the actions listed on
the agenda that evening. Mr. Ide advised that the owners of the
property proposed to be taken by eminent domain would have an
opportunity to address the Boards. He noted that fallowing the close
of the public hearing, the Directors would consider adoption of the
proposed Resolution of Necessity.
Public Hearing The Chairman announced that this
was the time and place fixed by
the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14
for a public hearing relative to adoption of a Resolution of Necessity
to acquire right-of-way by eminent domain for construction of the
Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract
No. 14-1-1A.
� -18-
10/10/90
Open public hearing The Chairman declared the
hearing open at 9:15 p.m.
Receive and file written report of Moved, seconded and duly
General Counsel carried:
That the written report of General Counsel dated September 18,
1990, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
Receive and file Proof of Service Moved, seconded and duly
by Mail of Notice of edri ng carried:
That the Proof df Service by Mail of Notice of Hearing to property
owners dated September 25, 1990, be, and is hereby, received and
ordered filed.
Receive and file written comments Moved, seconded and duly
from property owners carried:
That the following comments from, or on behalf of, property owners
be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed:
From Dated
- Drummy Garrett King & Harrison October 1, 1990
(on behalf of Mesa Verde Country Club)
- Southern California Edison Company October 5, 1990
- Sullivan, Workman & Dee October 9, 1990
(on behalf of Magna Enterprises, Inc.)
- Carlsmith Ball Wichman Murray Case October 10, 1990
Mukai & Ichiki (on behalf of Harbor
Mesa Trust)
Oral presentation by staff The Director of Engineering
reviewed the recommended
alignment of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to
Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A, and pointed out that in
accordance with the requirements of the City of Costa Mesa, the
sewer could not go up Harbor Boulevard. He advised that three
property owners had objected to the proposed sewer alignment
through their property. Staff and General Counsel have been
unable to negotiate the purchase of easements necessary from these
three property owners, Mesa Verde Country Club, Southern
California Edison Co. and Magna Enterprises, Inc./Harbor Mesa
Trust, required for construction of Contract No. 14-1-1A.
Mr. Dawes reviewed other alignments considered and explained why
they were not chosen as the best alternatives.
With regard to the section of the pipe going through a parking lot
owned by Magna Enterprises, he noted that the work would be
completed within two weeks, and the Districts would refurbish the -
parking lot after the pipe was installed.
-19-
10/10/90
Staff also advised that in choosing the best alignment through the
golf course and Edison properties they had to take into
consideration a bridge over the Santa Ana River planned to be
built in the future by the County of Orange, and the alignment
selected will accommodate this bridge.
Mr. Dawes indicated that the Districts would replace whatever
trees had to be removed from the Mesa Verde Golf Course during the
course of construction. He noted that the sewer would be placed
at a higher elevation than the golf course but that it would be
designed to blend into the course.
Oral testimony by property The Chairman recognized the
owners and others fallowing persons who
addressed the Boards
regarding their objections to the alignment of Contract
No. 14-1-1A:
- Carol Herrera, Harbor Mesa Trust
Ms. Herrera stated that she was the Property Manager for the
property owned by Magna Enterprises. She questioned the length of
time to complete the section of the sewer within the parking lot
used by their tenants and indicated that previously she had been
told it would be considerably longer than the two weeks now
quoted. Ms. Herrera also expressed concern relative to the
inconvenience of those persons using the parking lot during
construction and later if the sewer needed maintenance work.
Districts' staff assured her that concrete gravity sewers such as
this rarely have any problems and that there would not be a
manhole in the parking lot. Therefore, they should not expect to
be inconvenienced in the future. Ms. Herrera advised that the
property owner is strongly opposed to this alignment and he did
not wish to discuss the Issue or alternatives with staff.
- Jim Kennedy, Southern California Edison Company
Mr. Kennedy stated that the Edison Company has the same concerns
as the Sanitation Districts in that they must be prepared to meet
the increased demand placed on their facilities. They are
concerned because the right-of-way requested by the Sanitation
Districts passes through one of the most encumbered corridors they
have which contains lines that serve approximately 60% of SCEC
customers in Orange County. Mr. Kennedy stated that the corridor
is only 75 feet wide. He added that should they ever be required
to move their 220,000 volt line over If the Santa Ana River
Channel is widened by the Carps of Engineers, there would be very
little roam if the Sanitation Districts acquires the proposed
20-foot easement. He also noted that they may have to place the
six 66,000 volt lines currently in this same corridor underground
at some time in the future, and SCEC would then need the easement
area to do so.
Mr. Kennedy requested a 30-day delay in considering the Resolution
of Necessity in order to allow more time to discuss other possible
alternatives. He indicated SCEC wished to cooperate with the
Sanitation Districts but would like a little more time to find a
mutually-agreeable location for the Districts' line.
-20-
10/10/90
Staff responded that a 30-day continuance could prevent
construction from beginning in January which was crucial . Even if
the resolution is adopted, staff noted that they would continue to
negotiate with all the property owners to attempt to reach a
mutual agreement.
- Charles W. Parret attorney for Mesa Verde Country Club & Country
ub member
Mr. Parret indicated that the Mesa Verde Country Club strongly
opposed the Resolution of Necessity. He stated that they believe
the sewer line will be extremely injurious to the Country Club.
He also expressed concern because the elevation of the sewer would
create a barrier on the northern boundary of the Club. Mr. Parret
advised that the County Club is in the process of redesigning the
course to create championship facilities and to encourage the LPGA
to add the course to its tour, and he observed that berm would
effectively prevent them from designing the hole in this area as a
championship hole.
He stated that he had consulted with other agencies that believed
this pipeline could be placed underground. Mr. Parret noted that
It was his understanding that the Country Club was originally
Informed that the plans were for an underground sewer rather than
an above-ground structure. He also stated his belief that the
County would not build the proposed bridge over the Santa Ana
River from Garfield to Gisler. Therefore, in his view, several
other alternative alignments should be possible.
The Districts' Director of Engineering responded to Mr. Parret's
comments. He explained that if the sewer were to be placed
underground, it would have to be a siphon, which is a 66-inch
pipe. It would also need to be 600 feet long, which far exceeds
the length the Districts' staff recommends for a siphon because of
maintenance problems. Mr. Dawes also advised that the highest
point of the sewer along the golf course would be four feet. He
stated that there would be no structure built on the site.
Mr. Dawes reiterated that many alternative alignments were
studied. Several of the choices were so disruptive to traffic on
very busy streets that they were unacceptable. With regard to
the County's proposed bridge to connect Garfield and Gisler, the
Districts' staff cannot recommend a project to the Board that may
have to be relocated in a few years. He pointed out that the
Districts must design this sewer to allow for the planned bridge.
Mr. Parret's opinion on whether it would ever be built was just
that, an opinion.
Several Directors agreed with Mr. Parret's concerns relative to
the importance of the design of each hole and reassured him that
the Districts would strive to cooperate with the County Club to
arrive at an agreeable solution to the problem. It was suggested
that a golf course architect might possibly be consulted. The
width of the fairway in the location of the proposed sewer line
was discussed. It was pointed out that because it is quite wide
in this area, the elevation on the north end should pose no
problem for golfers.
-21-
10/10/90
Staff reiterated that notwithstanding the proposed Resolution of
Necessity, they would continue to attempt to negotiate an
acceptable agreement with the Club.
`..� Close hearing There being no further
public comments, the
Chairman closed the hearing at 10:25 p.m.
Adopting Resolution of Necessity Directors expressed their desire
re at uisition of ro ert b to continue to address the
eminent domain concerns of each of the property
owners in an attempt to reach an
acceptable solution in each case. They also noted the importance of
moving forward with the proposed project and did not wish to delay it.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-148,
describing a certain project; making statement of the public use for
which certain property is to be taken in reference to statutory
authority to acquire said property by eminent domain; describing
general location and extent of said property to be taken; declaring
findings and determinations on public interests and necessity for said
property; authorizing and directing eminent domain proceedings to be
commenced in Superior Court to acquire said property, including
application for possession of said property prior to judgment; and
making other determinations required in connection with the
Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract
No. 14-1-1A. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a
part of these minutes.
`..s' DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:27 p.m. , October 10, 1990.
DISTRICT
Actions re Annexation No. 125 -
Tract No. 9608
Rescindin Board' s action on Moved, seconded and duly carried:
May 1 1987 au horiz ng the
General Manager to enter into an That the Board's action on
a reement between the ro 2rt May 13, 1987 authorizing the
owner developer, Orange County General Manager to. enter into an
Harbors, Beaches and Parks District agreement between the property
and the City of Orange re said owner/developer, County
annexation Sanitation District No. 7, the
Orange County Harbors, Beaches
and Parks District, and the City of Orange, setting forth the terms and
conditions of proposed Annexation No. 125, be, and is hereby,
rescinded.
-22-
10/10/90
App roving Sewer Service Agreement Moved, seconded and duly carried:
with Crawford Hills Associates
That the Board of Directors
hereby adopts Resolution No. 90-149-7, approving Sewer Service ^
Agreement with Crawford Hills Associates providing for deferred payment
of annexation acreage fees for a portion of the territory contained in
proposed Annexation No. 125. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is
hereby made a part of these minutes.
Authorizing initiation of Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Fceedin Tras re ro osed Annexation
N 1 5 - ct No. 9bUtJ That the Board of Directors
hereby adopts Resolution
No. 90-150-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex 182 acres
of territory to the District located in the vicinity of Chapman Avenue
and Crawford Canyon Road in the City of Orange, proposed Annexation
No. 125 - Tract No. 9608 to County Sanitation District No. 7, and
rescinding Resolution No. 87-39-7. Said resolution, by reference
hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Accepting Grant of Easement from
Mr. 8 Mrs. Albert B. Schilling for That the Board of Directors hereby
right-of-way required re adopts Resolution No. 90-151-7,
Contract No. 7-14 accepting Grant of Easement from
Mr. and Mrs. Albert B. Schilling for
right-of-way required in connection with Abandonment of Nine District No. 7
Pump Stations, Contract No. 7-14, and authorizing payment in the amount of
$1,000.00 for said right-of-way. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is
hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:27 p.m. , October 10, 1990.
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:27 p.m. , October 10, 1990.
Secretary oft Boards of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14
-23_
FUNCI 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL ` PROCESSING DATE - 9106190 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
69UN' BRAMSE
CLAIMS PAT 09/12/9Nj OGSTING DATE 09/12/90 .
JIARP ANT NB 1CN0A
109208 A S 6 INDUSTRIES S10.354.06 SCRUBBER PAN INLET INSTALLATION
4442 9 ARC PA: '! 0B �189B flTR}PRl6
109210 MAG .SYS TE NS S :{942.08 'INSTRUMENT PART
109221 ASS ANALYSIS 5571.25 MECHANICAL TESTING
9212 AURA „.`{i06.SY `SBQIvis-ION
109213 ACTIDN-MARTIN $150.65 HARDWARE
109214 AIR ACCESSORIES CO. $1.951.85 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
—kD84'5 `•R PHoj0-SGRV4C" �.-t9}9.d9----;— 'AERIAL PUOTOS FGS-0}84-FLBiF80RYB[
109216 ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY CO.. LTD. $15.424.31 ;•,_ , 3 7YYRDIE`COVERS -
109217 SAFETY SUPPLY AMERICA $1.836.62 - SAFBTT SUPPLIES -
._} $244S— ALONA p2 "582.67 SPEBIA6.—rGASno
109219 ROBC0 INC. A/OR AMERICAN SEALS $4.895.80 SEALS 6 RABBETS
209220 AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY $297.12 CA IFLLH
.N.u.I-
}8922} SEVER-60NSiRU6H0 AIRS-DIFF-7 d-2
109222 APCO -VALVE S PRIMER CORP $1.498.99 VALVE
109223 - A-PLUS SYSTEMS $898.64 ,NOTICES d ADS
—109224 APPLE ONE SAW-BE89}68S
109225 AQUANETICS $98.74 POOL
FTY 109226 ARATEK SERVICES, INC. S3.572.20 UNIFORM RESTAL5 ,
x --i09227RALPH 11 ATKIPSDII. .-s376 98 P01@ PAR^6
109228 RANDOLPH AUSTIN CO.. - S57.80 UB SUPP6IRS
pp 109229 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT. CO. f510.00 ;,TNOGE PART
—I 9230 AUTOMAZ764-1IHNA A CONTROLS GO s4
109231 B S T HYDRAULICS $559.87 MECHANICAL PARTS
n 109232 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $40,653.95 GRIT REKDVAL M.0.10-29-90
444233 "SON-i-SNEPPARB S82i.iA ENQ}N880.'N^o+`ea.CeS
1-' 109234 SACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE <: $189.50 BAC[PWN TESTING
109235 BACKSTREET GALLERY . 555.57 FRAMING
—144236 P 96,56,2�50 ^^`BTBM40N-MVICES-PI-34-2.P2-37.R2-234-
109237 BANTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $3,502.39 LAB SUPPLIES
109238 BEATRICE HUNT WESSON $3.148.02 REFUND USES FEE OVERPAYMESY
—109239------------.^.OBE.A.S-8E}N.1FlkLiAR '^A" AS Sx&r502.3^ RtKiMeBe;;:P-EQV}CE65-33.3 34
109240 BETTER BUILD SCALE PROD. S650.00 LIS EQUIPMENT
109241 - BLACK BOX CORP $145.81 - COI@OTBR HARDWARE
—109242--R06SA-NADFATGR-4ESViCE L14A Tg HAOIATOS-mA}R
109243 BON-A-AUES $214.07 TRUCK PARTS
109244 BROWN A CALDWELL 34.904.25 LAS SERVICES
—i09245 6ROYN-6-6ALDYELl 90NGUL-HOG— m q AN WGINRRSING-8E8V}CES-P2-23-3-1.R2-35-1.3.4.5---
109246 THE BURKE COMPANY S98.14 . ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
109247 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $1.320.14 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
—10924A 6A BY Gr-64REED- $513h USH-REIMBURSEKEWT
109249 CAL-CHEH SALES $148.75 LAB SUPPLIES
109250 CALIF. ASSOC. OF SANITATION S510.00 REGISTRATION
—15925: -GA.'16RG-MANUFACi R-iS 88-R88-OPERPAYIBN}
109252 - JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $43.269.51 ENGINEERING SERVICES I-9
109253 CHRISTINE T. CARR f1.134.00 COMPUTER INPUT SERVICES
FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE - 9/06/90 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
Dtg;a
rNCLAIMS PAID 09/12/90 i pOS-ISTING.OAYE 09/12/90
YARR u NEND ...°TEAM
109254 CHARLES W. CARTER CO. $515.17 PUMP PART
25.89 TRLBPRBBB-BYbTEM-MODIFECATIOMS
109256 CHAMPION FENCE CO. $1,628.00" PBMcm,
10925T CHEVRON U.S.A.• INC. $568.40 PAINT,RUEPLIES
ROKE--CRANIt3 HAEi.-INC. .2..184.60 ME[IRANfCAb YARSB-RffiA7A
109259 COAST AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION 153.16 TRUCE PARTS
109260 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $121.13 SAFETY SUPPLIES
" IS Al°°
109262 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF S6.375.00..:, . PUMP PARTS '
109263 CONNELL G.M. PARTS / DIV. $212.12 MUM PARTS
LO-9269 ONTAINFR-SEE-ELELTICAL DISPOSAL $50 9T TOXIC WO-0EPDISPO
109266 CONTINENTALED CHEMICAL DISPOSAL •1.923.16 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL
10926E CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS $1.923.18 BLUEPRINTING
nn • A. r0 UIPI®1'T T88TING
309268 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $72.90 TRUCK PARTS
109269 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 8115.1E ELBC1U C SUPPLIES
'°R.X_CUR.i.LTRUCK--"GUTAMENT °. " -A_0 66DOQFR&109A6-MA.7-1h90-
m 109272 ONE, INC. $846.48 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
X 109272 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE $517.06 TIRES
_ •°J'273 nAult INrT°UKERT° ".-]"-°° IMSTRWORYB-PARTS
109274 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS SI70.95 LAB SUPPLIES
109275 DICKSONS $847.88 'AIR W lTIOMHA
—4."976 NOAA00-EN7ERFA SES.-iNC. - L925.A4 PLANT-MAINTENANCE-6-REPAIRS
109277 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $1,148.89 PAINT SUPPLIES
n 109278 E.I.L. INSTRUMENTS, INC. $1.879.87 ELECTRIC PARTS
�.092ie LASiRAN.--I11C. 12 1-7-O9 —.CESUPP128E
fJ 109280 EL TORO COMPUTER SOLUTIONS $25.80 COMPUTER REPAIRS
109281 ENCHANTER, INC. S4.8DO.00 OCEAN MIDNITORING M.O.3-14-90
—109282 DODGE-CONSTRUCT-IOWMEWS ----L7b.OB- ADVERTISEMENT-- —
109283 LEEDS 8 NORTHRUP S907.25 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
1092B0 JOHN S. FALKENSTEIN P.E. $3,690.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-4. J-20
--4692S8 -&EOERAL-EXPRESS-CORP. -166.80 .IR-PREIGIIT
199286 FERRELLGAS $22.95 PROPANE
109267 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $96.19 PUMP PARTS
—109288 — VISA PEE-OVERPAYMENT109289 FISCHER A PORTER CO. 53.579.94 CHLOAIMATION PARTS
109290 FLUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $1.799.61 PUMP PARTS
—109292 —FOUNTAIN VALLEY-CANE 0.A •48.52 PAIN
109292 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $248.52 PAINT 80PPLIAB
109293 THE FOABORO CO. t2.653.26 INSTIHOUNT PARTS
3115.00- -WATBB-USE
109295 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $263.71 BUILDING MATERIALS
109296 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY S1.338.75 CHEMICALS
—189297 --GAPES-F4EERLLASS-4NST"I ERE i40A" FIBRIQLA6S-PABRIGMTON
109298 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. S175.31 TBLBPBONB SBRVIC88
109299 GEORGE LEECH R ASSOCIATES S192.08 PIPE
FUND. 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL `. PROCESSING DATE ' 9106/90 PAGE 5
REPORT'NUMBER AP43
"""NFY-BANlf AflGI 03-FRZG{S-W--N06NB F60-NIV
CLAIMS PAID 09/12/90 POSTING DATE 09/12/90.
J/dip_wT " IZAIDO. AMOUNT
109392 SEA COAST DESIGNS $2,213.78 OFFICE FURNITURE
�„ SNANROCK-SUPPLT 4 1.220 B7 TOO&O
109394 PACIFIC EXCHANGER B MACHINE _. '5,10.359.38 _ VAPORIZEY`
109395 SMITH-EMERY CO. `62s123.50. BOIL IRS PER O M.0.6-14-89
—404301 SOFT ,•^EHOUSEA"SRN-RE& 54 SON- 69 li "'PITUARa
109397 SOLAR TURBINES INCORPORATED S816.47 MECHANICAL PARTS
109398 SO. COAST AIR QUALITY $260.00 PERMIT ME
—10959E ^WN-COASZ--Is -Uf' TVAs An -BouRGE—ma—mg
109400 SOUTH COAST DODGE $76.50 STRUCK.FARTS `.
109401 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. E9.108.53 POYBQ
—209402---SOrCALT GAS CO. •A,595."8 pfilso ti 868
109403 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. 68.299.01 DIESEL FOE.
109404 STAMEN Z. SPASSOFF. P.E. $4.520.80 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-34-2
—i"^•^�.-..�YESiALWT--ENC. ...421 as I I6S
109406 STAR TOOL B SUPPLY CO. $766.29 TOOLS
109407 STIRRERS TREE SERVICE %, $925.00 TUBE TREEING SERVICES
—40940B- STERL446-AR: .7t^.9N - GRAPH• -SVPPMES
109409 SUMMIT STEEL S1.793.81 STEEL
m 109410 SUPELCO. INC. $848.28 LAB SUPPLIES
. X ---iO84L3 •^N73N6NFAl.-A-IR-T40L IN' 80.+.26 SS mcm i.e...
._-. 109412 SYMANTEC CORP. $57.06 COMPUTER SOPINARE
CG 109413 IS SCIENTIFIC GLASS $1.792.97 TEST TUBES
—y 3G9414--TA Y LOR-WNN-MFG.-SOMPANY •5,, 363GTREG-86R"MTS
109415 TEKMAR COMPANY S407.16 LAB SUPPLIES
n 109416 THEO-TELLO-SUSCH. INC. $384.00 INSPECT CRANE
I -4108447 TMAANORCAI MB-"oHAVIG6
W 109418 THUMB B ASSOC. $2.950.00 CONBULTIE6 BRBPICES
189419 -ITS TROPICAL FISH $1,072.59 MUM SAMPLING SUPPLIER
—109420 TRAVEL-4RAVEL •`.DBi+00
109421 H.O. TRERICE CO. $1.193.87 INSTRUMM PARTS
109422 TRUCK A AUTO SUPPLY. INC. $857.82 TRUCK PARTS
—109425 .6. T CKSX- SON.-INC --51.247-21 89RE¢MY-P&RIS
109424 UNOCAL $168.35 OABOLIRR
109425 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 353.70 PARCEL SERVICES
—1d94F6--YGR-dGSENi-IFTC Bd�S99Ab- WB-SOPPRRS
10942T VALIN CORPORATION $128.43 REGULATOR PARTS
109428 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. S6098.48 HARDWARE
—.-9429 ERTSX-SYSTENB 66.242.58 GQPUI'Ba-W7A-SOPPORT-- -
109430 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY S549.51 SATBTY SUPPLIES
109431 VILLAGE NURSERIES $314.77 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
—1G9432------CARL-WARREN-A-CO --S224.I6 'NBORANC60LATM8-ADfIMISVRATOR -
109433 WEST COAST ANALYTICAL SAY. $510.00 LAB SERVICES
109434 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY 343.877.47 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-9-89
—t8-.-.3�—AEROX-GORP. -^11-84 cop 0-6BA82S
-----------------
------TOTAL-C6AINS-PA4"4112/90 H.28T.555"2- --------------
_________________
FUND NO 919% - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 910090 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CLAIMS PAID 09/12190_ POSTING DATE 09/12190'
NA881SI�10. xEA00A ANOUN T- ^rernl•TION
109346 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. $1,656.22 SAFETY SUPPLIES
.n93A
109348 MICROAGE COMPUTER STORES - $79.69 'COMPUTER SOFTVABE - -
109349 MICROSOFT ,i- $222.89 - PUBLICATION
�09350 -MILLAA�LE.YATOILBE",— .170.0! B6HVA.�B-lL1INTeNSdG•
109351 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $604.00 ELECTRIC PARTS
109352 MITCHELL INTERNAT
eONAL. INC, f92.10 PUPILCATTOd
n naca xn ur cnx ro. i egllRArx 7L 7A! 23 LAB C&TIO•= -
109354 MOTOROLA, INC. $236.41 INSTRUMENT PARTS -
109355 WEAL SUPPLY CO. $311.30 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
-109356 "ELZO3 OOUCTS tB.311.38 RBFOND-B6RR-Fed-OVSRPAYI&NT----
109357 NEWARK ELECTRONICS f133.19 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
109356 OR SYSTEMS CO. 929.940.82 CHIMING M.0.2-14-90
109360 ORANGE BEARING. INC. '> $91.90 BABOWASS
109361 ORANGE VALVE 6 FITTING CO. $1.150.55 FITTTNCS
I093GB OR'WEA-SERV.ME - =415dt - SPBC•..,LTr_QQASES
m 109363 CSDOC SELF-FUNDED MEDICAL INS 5100.000.00 PREMIUM ADVANCE
X 109364 PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF $30.00 SUBSCRIPTION
Z �0.365 nere EgALERENr C^ =1 3.5.8E SAFETY SOEPLIES
109366 PACIFIC BELL $14.09 TELEP000E SEBNICES
UO 189367 PACTEL CELLULAR $51.29 CElDAB TELEPHONE SERVICES
-10V368 •A06ET7+-TNOMRSON. 6125.00 ^•^IBTBATIOR
109369 PARTS UNLIMITED $37.75 TRUCK PARTS
b 109370 PIMA 610 SYSTEMS. INC. $45.096.03 SLUDGE RNDVAL M.0.5-11-88
1 -L0937L POLAA030 CORRORAS-ION1. as CANS. APTA• -.
A 109372 POLY ENTERPRISES. INC. $309.19 SAEKTT SUPPLIES
109373 POLYPURE♦ INC. 513.173.7E POLYe®-S M.0.1-10-90.8-9-89
109374 SORTER-.BOILER_SERVICE,-INC.--- •468.03 HLECTRIC-FARTe.----
109375 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE f118.00 ICE
109376 PRODUCTION PLATING f250.00 REFUND USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT
-1483i7 I E-BROJECTS-SOwswN-Co L21969.O8 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION H.0.0-10-88
109376 QMS. INC. 2346.62 COMPRESSOR PARTS
109379 QUEST INTERNATIONAL INC. $158.13 INSTRUlERY PARTS
-109300----NANCHOS TIAO"OLLEGE - -4350.10 _REGISTRATION__---- ---
109381 RED VINE SHOES 5203.92 SAFBIY SHOES
109382 R.A. REED ELECTRIC $2.836.41 ELECTRIC REPAIRS
____40 3B3 •EIEOV--TEMP 04 SI8.09 TEO`ORARR-SeRVICeS-__
109384 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. $3.565.21 GAIIGe/BAeDNABE
199395 DETECTOR ELECTRONICS CORP. $283.19 INSTRUMENT PARTS
109386 R9SEMOUNTIUNILOC ----61.65➢.81--- ----INSTBOIffiIT SUPPLIES---- -
149387 RUTAN L TUCKER f5.271.91 LECAL SERVICES BEATRICE/SOdT-VBSSON
IC9388 RYAN-NERCO $333.39 HARDWARE
-...... .S.A.€.--IMCN3DIERT-EM6.r-7"• M3Lr60 NECRAMICAL-REPAIRS
109390 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. $132.88 PARTS CLEANER
109391 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT•L f200.960.11 OCEAN MOSITOBING M.0.6-13-90
FUNDS.- 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL �- PROCESSING DATE 9/05/90 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
'""NTY--6AN;iAY-10�0*6*`}GTBRAND
CLAIMS PAID 09/12/90 '� ISTING DATE 09/32/90'
J/ARRANT-N^. YE-MOOR .:• s N ..
109300 61 ERLICH-MITCHELL. INC. $3.345.36 PUMP PARTS
—10-9304 :P.EAS-WESSSA N-RECLAN .. KG SSB➢IfRS
109302 DON SEE S ASSOC IATE3. 'Y2.617.50 'EdCINBEBING-58RVTC85
109303 MACH COMPANY $32.92 - I.AE SUPPLIES
-408309 •K INOZON--INDUSTRIAL PIAST7C5 "f90d.P6 ®p06
109305 HATCH S KIRK INC. f1.106.42 MGM PARTS
I a 9306 S. A. MEALY CO. $126.505 60 CONSTRUCTION PI-35-1
—iO .30 al .:.... ➢AfS SUPFLI➢S
109308 HIGH VOLTAGE ELECTRIC - `f1.350.00 , ..ELECTRICAL PARTS
109309 HILTI• INC. $416.32 KARDBA"
—1403AA .. ERBa6ER-G.V-A G"IF'-.-ING� f]64 05 MECHANICAL PARTS
109311 HOUSE OF BATTERIES f1.010.91 BATTERIES -
109312 P.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. 54.043.51 PAINT SUPPLIES
109314 IND INDUSTRIES - - ' $559.85 ,INSTRUMENT PART'
109115 TWA ENGINEERS 51.980.00 BEGIN " XG SERVICES P1-27-2
—N1.1. PER-IAL�EST--GHE 4 4A 524.97 �RiDE4I.O.A-I1-90
109317 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1,460.21 COMMECID"
m 109318 INGRAM PAPER S40BO.33 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
X —13933� I:TERNATIONAL-SENSOR-TECH. S _
... �. .. .
109320 IRVINE RA NCM YATEP DISTRICT ' S3B3.52' `'WATER U8E-
Ib L09321 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP. $767.69 ]ANITORIAL SUPPLIES
2 A.F.-JOHNSON-COMPANY .412.-.y —IiF..."'-'LIES
109323 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $195.03 ELECTRIC PAHT3
109324 KANER COMPANY $2.204.90 ELECTRIC PARTS
I —10832` "LY-SERY;CGS .5-386 99
1C9326 KINMERLE OROS., INC. 568.94 - GASMIll -
109327 KING BEARING. INC. $2.656.78 - HACIUME SUPPLIES
—IP93'B HIIA PP.-MARSH.-JONE6-6-DORAN 5316.50 "^VIC68—DNIYBRSAI�C2RCOLTB-
109329 KNOT INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $1,453.25 TOOLS
109330 VLADIMIR KOGAN $50.35 MILEAGE EXPENSE
—1893a1 CART-IN-NORDILK.--6R ma AS wM6OPNCTiOY-SBBVIGE8-S-35-�
169332 LEAGUE OF CALIF. CITIES •P$200.00 MEN ERSBIP DUGS
1D9333 LEE 0 RO CONSULTING ENGR• $61,013.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-33
—189334 --LE-ROY-CRANOALL-L-ASSO6. 53.960.-11PII6-0PIPCNF6HRYICES-
109335 LEYCO ELECTRIC CO. 5505.20 TRUCK REPAIRS
109536 LINITOROUE CORP. $821.35 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
—1O93i7 --0. LOOK 'b2# O-USBPrP�OVEe➢AYIffi7I-
19338 A.J.J. JANETI11 LYNCH CO. f418.20 ]AIRTO8 SUPPLIES
169339 MPS f37.19 Y90TOGRAPGRC SERVICES
—309341 --MAGOMCOLCOLM CIGIL,864.77 ENRVICB-ING SERVICES
109342 MALCOLM EPIRNIELECTRONICS
. INC. f1$319.90 INCIRUMENT SERVICES N.O.]-12-89
109342 MARVAC ELECTRONICS f318.90 INSTRUMENT PARTS
9343 R ER r- NC- 53.30
10934 DON MAUR .30 . MEAN
MONITORING CONSULTANT
109345 NCNENNA ENGR• S EQUIP. $6,409.16
POlB PARTS '
POND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCRSSING DATE 09/06/90
RRPORT NUMM M43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
s_s"�D-DS(32L90--BORILIL➢°TB 09/li/RO
SONNARY ANOUNT
91 OPER POND - 3 2.891.06
92 OPEN FUND 10,408.50
93 OPER FUND 13.705.35
95 OPER FOND 360.94
P7 GPM FUND 13.179.95
Y7 CAP YAC POND 659.35 -
914 OPER FUND- 62 _--_
P14 DYER POND 843.75
/14 CAP PAC POND B43.75
9647 OPEN POND 3.359.07 -
h614 OPEN FUND 9.03
�ERFUNU.
CORM 279.608.30
m S.P RPALTR INS./ S.P. LIAR INS. FUNDS 100,224.16
X
f 1.187.555.12
tij
1
m
Fut. .J 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL ` PROCESSING DATE 912819U PAGE 1 `.
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CLAIMS PAID 09/26/90 POSTING'DATE 09/26/90''
NARRAIIT NO VENDOR AMOUNT DES CB28.Tr^"
109453 AALRBR $95.00 REGISTRATION
i09464-.-0.8
`189455 AT L T $484.80'. •'. ,.S#dING DI9TANCB-TELEPHONE SERVICe
109456 AERO TECH SURVEYS, INC. $2,205.46 FYNOTo. BIIRVBYING
i0949T AIR COLO SUPPLYING 3
3
189458 AIR PRODUCTS 6 CHEMICAL INC. 111.198.80 O&M AGREEMENT-OEY. GEN SINT. H.0.8-9-89
109459 SAFETY SUPPLY AMERICA $13.08 SAFETY SUPPLIES
7
109461 BOSCO INC.. 9/OR AMERICAN SEALS f13,098.13 -� �.OWIDGAA6° -� ,.
109462 AXER IT ECM f97.J$ '«`C:DPIBR: LBA8B8
0941, 'XWE1 L-CORROAAFION-
109464 CITY OF ANAHEIM f425.598.37 ENGINEERING SERVICES H.C.12-10-86
109465 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $23.256.00 SEWER REPAIRS DIET 7
. . PPLIRS
109467 APPLE. ONE $1.663.24 TSHPORART SERVICES
109468 ARATEN SERVICES, INC. - S21T52.93 UNIFORM.RENTALS
}09469— ARROCIATgnI 'CHINA ;RATORS-6 `74.64 E ®MMO -' DENTAL3118.�IOMINISTAATOpB-
109470 AURORA/HYOROMATIC PUMP CO. •7$518.26 PUMP PART
ITI 109471 AYARDSSTROPHIES $21.09 NAME PLAQUES
_ . . �_..
.-. r109473 BANK OFRAMERI CA rf3.IS2.17- BANK RUCTI %°R r
W 109974 P.N. BAROTTI AND ASSOC. f6.197.59 CONSTRUCTION 88AV. -P1-34-2.P2-37•P2-23-6
—109476 BARTER SCIENTIFIC
`92.52 LABBSUPPLI0NP-DIBPAIBUTIOIi
to 109477 BEATER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS 51.050.00 LAB WASH TICKETS
109477 BEACON BAT ENTERPRISES, INC. flr D50.00 CAR NABN TICR@T8
I� 109419 BOL P-0SSTREBUTSON
H 109480 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $498.38 'RADIATOR NIC REPAIR
109980 BRENN ER-FTEOLEP f ASSOC.. INC. t498.]B IECNANICAL PARTS
109482 -BROWN-B:-DALDWELL t1.600.60 LAB�ERING
109482 BROWN A LASSOCIA CONSULTING s$6.744.46 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19
109483 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES. INC. ..r T94.04 SURVEYING SERVICES EMI 09-71
109485 C.O.--..--P.C`SO Fl$187 REGISTRATION ZMBURBBNBNP
109486 C.O.CORP..A.CO SUMMIT
SYS f$95.04 COMPUTER CLASS
109486 CPT CO / SUMMIT SOLUTIONS f95.00 COMPUTER CLA88 R8OI8TAATION
10948E CAL- LVPLA CONFERENCE
ARC t134.39 LABCONFERENCE PLI REGISTRATION
1U9480 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH. INC. !39.39 LAB SUPPLIES
109492 CJOHNHRI TINECAROLLO
I. CARINEERS f3B76515.08 ENGINEERING SERVICES I-9,P1-38• J-15
109492 CHRISTINE T. CApR f315.00 COMPUTER INPUT 98AVIC63
—IS9494 CENTURY PAINT Ai;ON 6-iY4Tf" C72.98 PAINPHBNB-LY8TEM-MODIFICATIONe
ID9495 CENTURY PAINT $372.9E PAINT SUPPLIES
ID9495 CHEVFON U.S.A.. INC. flr flq .19 PAINT SUPPLIES/GREASE i OIL
189490 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT STRUME $63.25 PIRB EQUIPMENT RSPAIRB
' 10999E LOLE-PARNER INSTRUMENT CO. SN.35 LAB SUPPLIES '
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/20/90 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP63
CLAIMS PAID 09/26/90 POSTIN6 GATE 09/26/90',
J1A
109499 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF $2,741.25 MECHANICAL PARRS
...... I.....rovr tlz OA BWIPRKOIR RSRVT ON
109591 CONARD.S PHOTOGRAPHY t723.13 PHOTOGRAPHIC:SERVICES
109502 CONNELL G.N. PARTS / DIY. $236.85 'TRUCE PARTS
ec 03 ^ -•LICTRIC" 01'c- ...... 6T eS60PAIvvSpp a
169504 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO $3.378.75 CHLORINE M.0.10-17-87
109505 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS $594.08 BLUEPRINTING
`09506 r^^a m NA191-111IR.1n__ .Nr. .acn AA ------B--- --- S11BLg
109507 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $955.90 •.::.TRIIC6 PARTS -
109508 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $2,790.20 SLEC2RIC SUPPLIES
-�D0609 . `80.Y-- P'Y --TAWC" ' E..... NT •36 2t0 60- BL,000B-RRM VAL_N.,0-7-"-90-
109510 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $160.00 7-235 $BI ANNEX PER
109511 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $250.30 7-134 SEE ANNEX PER
STATE 0. CAI IFIIRN IA "-nn 7 02R GONE.A11O76S pan
109513 ORE. INC. . . f1.716.69 HAEDyBSS
109514 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE f915.93 'TIRES +a
—49"tG ^r-ANFA-41"04AIIOW ....... BQSiPMR---4U NPALB
109516 DECO $249.10 TOOLS
m 109517 OEZURIK AND/OR CS CO. t1.340.69 VALVE PARTS
X ...... nlr.l loan ...PRI R0 BRINGING
ti L09519 SYCON CORP.c t69.51 : IRBTROXOR PART
CO 109520 DISCO PRINT COMPANY $136.19 HARDWARE _
c e2,l n.9E0Se e' E N•S*r tvglrN3 Tur_ e..aansG in STR'..9."^,,,R'"
--1 109522 DORADO ENTERPRISES. INC. f16.627.74 PLANT MAIIITS9W2CE A REPAIRS
CA 109523 GUNNEL BROS. MACH MOVING t1.630.00 SPACE RENTAL J-19A
I LO BS iA ^NNN ^
o UA^^. ^^010 ...9 .. _ PAMMA SUPPLIES
N 109525 E.I.L. INSTRUMENTS. INC. f300.42 ELECTRIC IPARTB
109526 EMA SERVICES. INC. t2.5t7.06 RIRIIMEBR171G SERVICES P2-64, J-23-2 ,
--109527SLCO.CR4 'L+20D-DO gQSAR..SANpLIRO.___..
109528 EASTMAN. INC. f1.591.19 OFFICE SUPPLIES
109529 ECOANALYSIS. INC. f925.90 OCEAN MONITORING
189600 'ALASHimemmeA& PART
109531 ENCHANTER. INC. f2.200.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.3-16-90
109532 ENGINEERS SALES-SERVICE CO. $56.88 PUMP PARTS
�ft"S3- ERNS-T-�MINNEYPROPBSBIONAL-BBRVICEB-------
109539 MARSHALL FAIRRES i1TS.68 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
109535 JOHN B. FALKENSTEIN P.E. $5,225.60 CONSTRUCTION SIRV. J-7-0, J-20, J-17
109536 `ALES-A-SSR CORP.109538 FEDERAL EMPRESS COR f$34.00 AIR ANEIOIPP
109538 FERRELL6AS f3A.A3 PROPANE
--109859 FIRE MASTER i-CO ,526&333.74 SAFETY 1ATIOR-pppTg— -—
109599 FIRE MASTER $2,990.00 TITRTP SUPPLIES
109541 FIRST AMEX ICAN TITLE INSURANCE f2.990.00 TITLI LITIGATION GUARANTEE
169543 FLEXIBLE
8
109543 FLEXIBLE SYSTEMS S455.61 TRUCE PARTS
109599 FL ICKINGER CO. tB0 T.73 VALVE '
FUNL. .,0 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL � . PROCESSING DATE 9/20190 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
f°'IWTT OANITA"II. O.GT RRCTS-04-OR AMGL-COYNiY
4LAINSPAID 09/26/9 O PO STIN6 GATE 09/26/99:
ii
—RRANT NO
Y EVIDOR 4WD UNT 'nrenn TprTnu t='S
109505 PONE SOROS COMPANY $282.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES
S232 nY F idl 7
109547 FOUNTAIN PALLET PAINT^ S9AOYt7 INT SUPPLIES i
109548 .FOX ENTERPRISES ,OIV B25.04 "STY, CWisDLTANT
109551 FRANCE COMPRESSOR PRODUCT $4.785.12 MmCHANICRL PARTS
109551 A.F. FRET 11105.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
—nq 02 6AIVA XI kV11t6R 60 .11, .. 1 RARE
109553 - GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. - ffi YA03.96 < .,BTELEPNDNE SERVICES".I. _
109554 GEORGE LEECH G ASSOCIATES S3Y026.19 'INSTRUMENT74ART9
i09558 "'GM-60MPAMY i60 03 EM!
109556 FRED A. HARPER 3]Y095.00 p8P8RRBD COMP DISTRIBUTION
109557 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $671.04 DRUGS
..e..
—�- _ -. B.PRMRE
109560 P.L.AHAH CONTAINERS
NC. - f2$906.10 "CONTAINER RENTALS '
109560 P.L HAWN CO., INC. 5906.10 'MILTING Eji
109 56} INC.A f96. 00 MEETING
109563 HILTIY INC. $247.94 CONNECTORS
ITl- 309563 Hi-PAY SAFETY RENTALS INC. $i•077 25 SAFETY EQUIPMENT
TO RENTAL
X '""6 67A25
s 109565 DONALD' 0. HONOMICHL "5300.00 '
BATTERIESCOMP DISTRIBUTION '" �`'
309567 MOUSE OF BATTERIES 5333.58 PATTHRIRB'
iog
A NT-9tIIFtIES
to 109569 HUNTINGTON
DUST BEACH RUBBED STAND 559.85 INSTRUMENT
ENTSTAMPS
109569 IMO INDUSTRIES f559.85 INGINEERIN PART
CO __
1N 109571 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL 955.859.23 ENGINEERING IC CHLRS
109572 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $722.76 CONNECTORS
CNLOR. N.O.O-11-90.11-t-B9
CONNBOTORS
—1095�74 —INGRAM-EM PIPER
IR •• 122 `7 TRUCK PART--eCPPt389
1895.75 INLAND EMPIRE SENSOR EQUIPMENT TE CO. i322.13 TRUCK PARTS
1095 T5 INTERNATIONAL SENSOR TECH. f2Y319.13 INSTRUMBMT SUPPLIHS
=.39s:6 `"E6T-WEE;MAN-SANIidRY-SYP0. •'.'o•-"e
INSTRUMENT PARPBTBB
109578 JENS EN HNSTNB NEWTS CO. f015.70 INSTRUMENT PARTS
109578 A.F. JOHNSON COMPANY f35.37 LAB SUPPLIES
--109580 KAMAN BEARINGS
50-7 30 INSTRUMEN PAR
2RTS
09581 KANAN BEARINGS 8 SUPPLY 39$560.61 HARDWARE
PARTS
309581 X4NER CA PANT f560.61 MAR➢WARB
109583 'ICES#TiG 536.82 TEMPORARYSE-ADMIN38MRIOt�F88
109584 KELLY FARING. $1,457.26 TEMPORARY SERVICES
109589 KING BEARING. INC. f1.037.2b MECHANICAL PARTS
169566 THE-T KNOX CO `r-078.-13 SAFETY
SUPPLIES
UPP ESRVICBS
109587 THE INOX COMPANY f78.13 CONSTRUCTION
CTION SE
109588 MARTIN NBE SGR• SG 32 Y202.11 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 5-35-1
109568--T6-S-'IME-6 RU PARTS
M
109590 LEEOS R NORTHRUP ,094.60 .INSTRUMENT PARTS 8
109590 LIMITOROVE CORP.LO f1Y099.60 MBCNANICAL PARTS
FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST VORKI09 CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/24/90 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CLAIMS PAID 09/26/90 . POSTING.DATE 09/26/99`' -
Enrq,AT.rinu
109591 K.P. LINDSTROM. INC. $7.113.57 CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.10-14-87
109593. LORAIN PRODUCTS - $328.00 "-SERVICE: AGREENEUT
109594 NBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL. $3.919.22 :'OCSAN SAMPLING'
—i MENT R-BBRVfOSB
109597 MAINFRAME SERVICE INC. $490.30 INSTRUMENT REPAIR
30959] MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS* INC. 5371.89 HATER REST KIT
RlfUe
�109599 MARVAC ELECTRONICS *154.87 S7'RUMeESUPPLIES
109600 MATT CH LOP. INC. '.48.328.78 ,VALVES/CU ORINATION PARTS
408601 "•"rLL-COLORS rat-B1 pgifP0IliO
109602 MCKENNA ENGP. i EQUIP. $8.453.84 PUMP PARTS
109603 MCMASTER-CARP SUPPLY CO. 11.122.23 BUILDING MATERIALS
109605 AICROAGE COMPUTER - %:S2.fi39.72 ' C0lEIITEH' PAATB
149606 HICROAGE COMPUTER STORES i952.62> COMPUTER SOFTWARE
--3-09607 "•"' AND "FG.-CORPRPHATI0N-PARTS '
109608 MILLAR ELEVATOR SERVICE G3011.66 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS
ITT 109639 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO. $3.012.63 SAFETY SUPPLIES
X IG PARTS
n2. 109611 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES '$4.095.00
to 109612 MOORE PRODUCTS CO. $152.69 `INS 8UMVIC88
�D961! canner ..E INSTRUMENT PARRS
109614 MORGANe CRANE CO.. INC. $1,493.75 NE GENIMA-BEgt{i�B
CRANE RENTAL
tc1 109615 MOTION INDUSTRIES. INC. 11.892.39 RECHANICAL PARTS
I L0S 636 un.nom ._ .0 °
J: 109611 MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICES $89.45 : 'CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES
109618 MUTOH AMERICA♦ INC. 188.63 OFFICE. MACHM REPAIRS. "
--189619 MA=ION6L-COACH-CORRDN AIS!•u !1 YAIi--ra.::PO0r
109620 NATIONAL LUMBER a•�-9137.29 HARDWARE
109621 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES. INC. 47.437.50 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICE
912.2 tL53 SA ili8TA1NENP-BUPPL.IRB
109623 NEVARR ELECTRONICS $10.70 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
109624 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $7.10 WATER USEAGE
NTROLS.-7N" 4.146.22 1EGNANICAL-PARTS— _
109626 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES 5403.32 SAFETY GLASSES
IC9627 THE OHMART CORP. 559.65 INSTRUMENT
t G9618 RI.Ns-,....aa-14 °
109629 ORANGE BEARING. INC. SBl e.31 MECHANICAL PARTS
109630 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY 5403.06 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
�0963t— "°4NGF.COU NTY-ALLTO-0.Ae•° • - --.- SLi6-2• TRUCK-PARTS _-
109632 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO.n $971.61 HYDROCHLORIC ACID
109633 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY CO. 5118.58 GROUMECOVER
9
109635 ORANGE OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY 1644.75 . DOOR REPAIR
109636 OXYGEN SERVICE 1778.09 SPECIALTY GASSES
F� . 0 9199 - JT 'DIST WORKING CAPITAL _ PROCESSING DATE 9120190 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CLAIMS MIMS NA PAID 09/26/90 POSTING,PATE N%/26/90
—11A...AST NO "EADO
199637 COUNTY OF ORANGE 13.742.00 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES
}006i0 ^^UNT" S••.T•T "�A-===7°-yCI ° 81 .-••--- WORKERS
3096l9. PSSI 't$4.705.RT 'MAI7IiDLB-INSPBCTI0N 31 �
109640 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY f3.073.08 ".,.pump`PARTB,
—109642 PACIFIC
109642 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. 3179.1E SAFETY SUPPLIES
109643 PACIFY. BELL f13.55 TELEPHONE BBRVECBB
}09699 ^'"" "" """ 17 TDI1O1 PASTE
109645' PEAT. MARWICK.^MAIN i CO. ! iS.000.00 . irJUOETENG SERVICES MlO.3-9-SB
109646 ROY PENOERGRAFT f495.00 DEFERRED-CE/P DISTRIBUTION
}89647 PH &VtA4+S-OE4 LEU
109648 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS. INC. 944.953.65 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88
109649 PLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE $659.61 HARDWARE
109651 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. _ i6S B.22 "7' ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
109652 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE t180.00 , ICE ;'�;� ,j
—10966d---...sPROJEGIE-SOLUT70N CO t6 019 00 - p '.*-amIpBeTl0N-M.8 S !a as
109654 PUMP ENGINEERING CO. $321.61 PUMP PARTS
m 109655 QUALITY BUILDING SUPPLY $116.93 BUILDING MATERIALS
X ..... 0 0 F ASS"..AYES11 121 11 BI'18EIDNIR597O saime6a
s . RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. i1r050.b1109657 TRAGR`DISPOSA
109650 RATTRAY AND ASSOCIATES( INC. ' $1.900.00 PHOTO' SURVEYING DIET 7
—k09659RG INS. An,r990.00 BRUBS8�0-88-
-1 109660 R.A. REED ELECTRIC t746.19 ELECTRIC PARTS
109661 REMEDY TEMP $3,153.77 TSMPORARY SERVICES
V'I 109663 REMOLD^POWER TRANSMISSION 189.6E HRCRRNECAL PARTS
109664 RICHARDS. WATSON G GERSHON $16.732.68 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.4-6-87
�0966'�-R06Ei10UNT-ANALIfi61 NT-RBPAI
189666 ROSEMOUNT/UNILOC $520.63 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
109667 ROYCE INSTRUMENT $215.62 INSTRUMENT PART
--1996fis AVUER--TRUER-REi:f46 INS. Ia_#nR.60 VA*-RlUffM --BUKHBRe W
109669 S t Y DIESEL $60.53 TRUCK PARTS
109670 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. $265.60 'PARTS CLEANER
3@961i AAMfA I A- 6EGTA;E-M07 DPE -g OTp
159672 DOUG SARVIS 5353.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
Ia9673 SEA COAST DESIGNS 5837.67 OFFICE SUPPLIES
TDRINO
109675 SEARS. ROEBUCK f CO. f120.48 TOOL
109676 SENSOREY. INC. $363.39 INSTRUMENT PART
—009677 SHAMROGK--SUPPLY ilJ 4A4---�p00
169678 SHEPHERD MACHINERY CO. $545.29 ENGINE PARTS
109679 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC f2.125.00 PHYSICAL EXAMS
—1996e8 iTA EMERY 0. IS-`22.SO EDFp-TROT;N0-1r0;O-}•-89--
109681 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. 52,769.04 TOOLS
109682 SOFT WAREHOUSE/WESTERN REGION- $513.11 CONFUTER BOYI'NARS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/20190 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CLAIMS PAID 09/26/90 : POSTING DATE 0 f'26/90 `
109683 SONNENSCHEIN, MAIN 1 ROSENTHAL $45,668.11 LEGAL SERVICES M.D.6-13-90
en_ J
r^e.r e I. n e •.r .a.A.nn l*aptn PNNS
109695 SOUTH COAST O04LITY $260.00 . pORMIT,pggg
109686 SOUTH COAST WATER 997.00 .;RENTAL EQUIPMENT
'O7 "ERry__gp
209668 SO.e CALIF. EDISON CO. $9.454.30 REPAIR DAMAGED POWER EQUIPMENT 5-29
109689 SO. CAL. GAS CO. $354.03 NATURAL GAR
309690 `^ "'ERA-CALLFti-t•S CO SO,,, ^2 -8BI-2 2?
10969L SO'. CALIF. WATER CO. _ 340.74 WATER'VORAGB
109692 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $610.09
309693 `^UZN4IEST-0.LYFRS I1I888LaPVL R '
33 91PUNB-SEERTER/COVBRPAYMBNT
109695 SPARKLE TTS PRINKING WATER f1.893.00 DRINKING WATER/COOLERS
SERVICESAB
109695 STAMEN I. SPAS50F F. P.E. f2.640.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-34-2
109697 STERLING ARTc $5.05 GRAPHIC SUPPLIER
109698 SUMMIT STEEL f1.277.41
�v96-99 "'N.06LI-1AN .47.g0 - �71 0UNDSRBBFLMG-*IG.8-9-89
109700 SUPER CHEM CORP $1.846.75 3A7ITOAin SUPPLIES
m 109701 SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS f221.00 PUBLICATION
X Weals
... ,.
_ 109703 MAHIN TALERI "" i153.22 •
209704 TAUBER ELECTRONICS - 123.L3 MEETING' REIGHT
EEPENBE
—1.0930b - °N-MFG.-20NRANY e. +2 I FREIGHT
109706 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD 45,057.52 VEHICLE
HG-GAAT-PARTB
-I TITLE INSURANCE LURA - CARGO VANE
w 1C9707 TRCOR TITLE INSURANCE f600.00 TITLE US
p� 109709 N.O. TRERICE CO. ._ 12.00068, US
-
109710 T.S. TRIPP - f325.00 CARPET CLEANING
9712 •U7-0-CSON. INC. $356.19- TRVCR-PART
109713 J.G.°TUCKER f SON. INC. f356.00 SOIL TESTING
PART
1-9713 TWINING LABORATORIES OF f1.967.00 SOIL TESTING N.O.6-19-89
.":19 .NITEM0YN-T-ANALTRVCAE 632E 31 PARCEL UNITED PARCEL SERVICE f324.90 PARCEL SERVICE
10971E VWR SCIENTIFIC fl♦324.90 LAB EflaSUPPLIES
—10971E VALLEY-INSTRUMENT GROUP
`?.323 R7 LAB SNgg- -
209719 VEHICL INSTRUMENT GROUP 5240.09 LAB SUPPLIES
109719 VEHICLE SPRING SERVICE s50.DO TRUCK REPAIR
109?21 RICHA�-SUB 8
109722 ARD
WEATHER V. VONWIND
LANGEN $234.50 MINTING BPPLRSE
IES
109722 WEATHER f WINO INSTRUMENTS f502.32 8RUST SUPPLIES
—109724 ROURKEII9 WOODRUFF
&g9.87S.03 LEGAL SERVICES ROURKE f VOOD0.UFF l$1,342.48 LEGAL eLERSES6 M.O.6-4-89
304125 XEROX CORP. t1.392.98 COPIER LBAB68
109126--30MHARD BTRSIEI COMP D
10972T RICH aRO B. EDG AA $220.00 DSPEAABD COMP DI8TR131UTION
.................
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 09/26/96 S2.59S.159.67
1 9199 - JT.DIST •WORKING CAPITAL ` PROCESSING DATE 09/20/90 PAGE 7 ! -
I{�utl REPORT NUM6BR AP43
COUNTY SANITAT DISTRICTS OP ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAIR 70 POSIXNa Opp0 26 90
SUMMARY AMOUNT
*I OPER Em 970.53'
92 OPER FUND ._ 4
p2 -OnP YAC FUND i -i 1 lha47T @6 $' r j
03 CAP FAC FUND $1,935.61 .
f5 OPER FUND $6,017.05
C 13 039.55
'06'OPBR PUND
06. CAP PAC FUND
47 OPER moanci23.503'1'dk..xs it l
07 CAP PAC FUND f19,562.50
011 OPER FUND $7,890.53
C 3 158.11
013 OPSA POND pa -
014 OPER:FUND v f2 422 QO: 'ivy ,' .X�Y,7' ♦ u r 13 ry31'%.
414 PA l 'f96? 8Q FG x} J
0566 OPER FUND $4,707.43
m 0546 CAP PAC FUND $13,681.19
4 543 65
x
2 JT OPER. FUND - + .xk : Y fT}209 3 9 nt
CORF i }521 759¢�a7.('+'a
FUNDED WORKBAG CONPINSOAANCB 611ND f20 290
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND f228,322.97
-------------
CO 2 590 154 67
=ir 1 pi r a ly,3.,
REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN
NOVEMBER 14, 1990
1 ) ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS OF APPRECIATION FOR
RETIRING DIRECTORS.
AS YOU KNOW, SEVERAL OF OUR CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS
WILL BE RETIRING FROM THEIR CITY COUNCILS THIS MONTH.
OVER THE YEARS, THESE DIRECTORS HAVE NOT ONLY
PERFORMED THEIR DUTIES AS CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS WITH A
HIGH DEGREE OF PROFESSIONALISM AND DEDICATION, BUT
THEY HAVE ALSO BEEN EQUALLY INVOLVED IN THE WASTEWATER
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OF THE SANITATION DISTRICTS .
I WOULD THEREFORE LIKE TO INTRODUCE FOR THE BOARDS'
CONSIDERATION, ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS EXPRESSING OUR
APPRECIATION TO THESE RETIRING DIRECTORS AND RECOGNIZING
THEIR OUTSTANDING CONTRIBUTIONS AND DEDICATION TO
PUBLIC SERVICE.
ACTIVE DIRECTORS
DIRECTOR'S NAME CITY DISTRICT(S) ON BOARD
DON E. SMITH ORANGE 2, 7, 13 & 14 22
JAMES NEAL FOUNTAIN VALLEY 2 & 3 6
TOM MAYS HUNTINGTON BEACH 11 4
ROLAND BIGONGER YORBA LINDA 2 4
WAYNE SILZEL VILLA PARK 2 4
ED ALLEN STANTON 3 2
WES BANNISTER HUNTINGTON BEACH 3 2
MARGARET ARNOLD CYPRESS 3 1
WE WILL HAVE PLAQUES PREPARED AND ASK EACH OF YOU
TO RETURN AT A FUTURE MEETING FOR A FORMAL PRESENTATION.
- ITEM 2 ON NEXT PAGE -
-1-
2) UPCOMING MEETINGS
A . EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE IS
SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY , NOVEMBER 28TH
AT 5:30 P . M .
(INVITE THE FOLLOWING DIRECTOR TO ATTEND:)
BETH GRAHAM
B . CONSERVATION , RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE - THE
CONSERVATION , RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE IS
SCHEDULED TO MEET ON THURSDAY , NOVEMBER 29TH
AT 5:30 P . M.
C . BUILDING COMMITTEE - THE BUILDING COMMITTEE WILL
MEET AT THE CALL OF THE CHAIRMAN. - +p• "I aq- v-&t- +
D. JOINT WORKS SELECTION COMMITTEE - THE JOINT WORKS
SELECTION COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON
fo 7 '-oo #.W .
%4
E . DISTRICTS 6 , 7 & T1. SELECTION COMMITTEE - THE
�y
SELECTION COMMITTEE FOR DISTRICTS 6, 7 & 141
IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON W ao$ �Q �q6i
- END OF REPORT -
-,NEE-- .GDATE November 14, 1990 TIME 7:30 P.M. DISTWCTS 1 .2.3.5.6.7, 11 , 13 6 14
DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS
(CRNN) ........WAHNER .......he — (SHAMER) .................ALLEN ........ _
IEGGAP) ........NTBIRT......� (AGE) ......................ARNOLD ......J _
NOUNG) ........amse .......JL IGPEENI....................WNBTER ... _
17...........STANTON .....Jle_ fWEDAAI ............ S C Nw I O
(NOR SY)....................CATLW ....... 1
9161RICT 2 (MUNNER) .................COX .......... J�l _
MINTER) .......PICKER ......]iN MAN)......................COVER ......JC
(Scom.........REAL ......... (PUCKETn..................EDBAR ....... Jr
IWEGAA) .. SC NW N1G. ..Zk — tmAmwEYI .................aRIJMM...... JA.f
IN01®YI ........CATLN........L ICHESSEM .................ORFFN....... J!
(YOUNG) ........GRISET ....... S✓ (YOUNG) ............- ...GP6EF ....... JC
(GRAHALII.......NAI101FY.....JC_ (PLUMIER) .................HART......... -le _
(CMVER) .......I.WN ......... AI — (GRAMMI ..................NAgNET.....Jr—
(WEDIM.........NELSON.......JrC (CULVEH)...................MAN .........�/
(ECKENROGE) ...NEWTOH ....... (SLVN.....................NAYS......... LL —
(S.LLDMNB .....SUEL......... (SCOrG ....................NEAL ......... JC
MAPREMI ......SUR" ........JC DYEDWII ..........••.•••••..NELSON ......JC
IROTHI........-STANTON ..... .A - (ECNENRGOE)...............NEWTON...... N/
MINTERI...................PIOGER ...... . _
DISTRICT 3 (HART) .....................KGNUER..... -&;� _
IMNEPI .........POLLS.........JC (MWEP) ....................POLIS ........ Je,
(WLES) .........SIEFEN ....... -AC IEGGAHI....................FONTIOUS .... V _
(NNAWVEM......ALLEN ........ 4L IEDGAR)....................iIYNIIR.....
(AGE) ...........ARNOLD ...... JT! (STANTON) .................ROTH......... JC
(GREEN ........BANISTER.... (COX) ......................SANSONE ..... Jf
MOPBY) ........CATLN........ Se MMLIDNDI.................SHERIDAN .... ✓^
(NAN) ..........CULWR......._LL (WLES) ....................SIEFEN .......
MAgNEYT......GRAINY ....... (SALDARN9.................S.3EL........ .
(CHESSEM ......GNFFN....... . — (BAFREPA) .................SATIN ........-se,
(YOGMN) ........GMSET ....... JL (ROTH) .....................SUNTON ..... .
(SCOTT).........REAL ......... -AL MLLEPI....................SWAN ........JL
(WED US.........NELSON....... yam_ (WALSTPOLR ..............SAW ....... .
MINTER) .......PWMER ..... ICRANWFERRYNANGREEM ..WANED......JC
(ROTM..........STANTOR ..... J� RNfiDNRFRI ................WBNM .......
DVALSTROR ...mvm........ JL MELSWI...................NEON........ —
MSnOI........MLSON ...... JC MSMM ...................MILSON....... JC
(GREEM....................
DISTRICT5
IRUNI.IER)......HART ......... ✓
(CON...........SANSONE .....
(STANTON) ......ROTH.........
DMTRICT6 STAFF OTHERS
MART)..........PLI ..... / SnvESTER......... ✓ woomu F ... JC
(FERRYMAN).....WANER......JFI! BRONN ............ IDE ............
(STANTON) ......ROTH.........✓ ANGERSON..........JC ANWAR .......
CLAWeON ........ OEASR ........
DISTRICT T DAWES............. JC FLEMNG......
IBANHEHA) ......SMITH ........L HOOOE8 ........... N/ HOHENER.....JC
IPUCKETT) ......EDGAR........JC MILE............... JC HOUGH .......
(PLUIMEM......COK .......... L CINDER.............1 HOWANU......
(VONG) ........GRLRET ....... L NELSON............ HUNT.........
(STANTON) ......R
OTH......... NICHGLS ...........JAB KNOPF........ ✓
( ON HMYD) .....SHERIDAN..... OOTEN.............Je- LINDSTRW ... -SC
(GREEN) ........WANNER ...... BTREED ............✓ LYNON........
VMENT ........... STORE........JC
DISTRICT11 VORLANGEN ........AI/ wAsoN .......
(GREEN) ........WNCm. ..... _ [�WN-SS�OANR�......A......_ Y���AAAO Nq .. .....
(SLVA)..........NAYS......... Qiy,rL GJ • ,.al 44Z
(ROTH)..........STANTON ..... a
DISTRICT 13 ►N� NNA+`"'P`�
SIMNDEM ..SeNwlul...JC Q JANMtti IY
(NELSON) .......NEON........JC— v^^
(HINTER) .......FICKLER ...... .96w
(STAMCN) ......ROTH .........r
(BAPRERA) ......SMITH ........
'.STRICT I4
--ALLEM ........SWAN.........
(RAMIOND) .....SIERMAN..... _
(EGGARI ........F JOUS..... .1.
(STAMcFR ......ROTH....... . J'C/
(BAPRESUM) ......SUM ........ y�
SS1GB/Po
an�AWv,aNGDATE November 14, 7990 Tun7.30 P.N. DIS'DIM 1,2.3.5.6.7. 11. 13 6 14�
DISTRICT S JOINT BOARDS
(CRW9 ........WANNER...... ✓ (SHAWNER).................MIEN ........ ✓ _
(EDGARI ........NICKER......_ (AGE) ......................AHNOLD ...... —
(YOIINO) ........GRISET ....... (GREEN)....................BMONBTER ... JL _�
�(I�OTHH)I.........STANTON ..... ✓ CARMAA) ...................SKNTNI6R ....
(NORSV)....................eg- w ....... .
(PLUMMER) .................OCK.......... . —
(WRIER) .......PIDMER ......— MAM................... CULVER ......
(PUCKErr).....................EDSAfl ....... —
\ GEIt.... /— MANONEVI .................GIEIIIAY...... —
d (NDRen ........am" .................
(YOUHG) ........MAHON Y..... (YOIIIKT) ...................RAW. ....... _
(GRAHAM)......."N ......... (GRAHAMAtumme .................HAM......... _
WEDINR) .......NEM N.......JG (GRAHAM ..................WIIDIQ:Y..... _
DVENM.........NELSON....... (OMMER)...................MAW .........= —
(ECKENPODE) ...NEWTON ......_ (SBVA).....................MAYS.........
.s.�
(SALGARNS .....SUM........ ✓ MOTO ....................MEAL ......... .a _
(BARREN) ......SMITH ........✓ (WEDIM ....................
(ROT"..........STANTON ... (ECKENRODE)...............
DISTRICT (HUNTER)...................PICKLEN ...... _—
(HART) .....................PLUMMER.....
M ..PO INER)....... LIS.........✓ MWER) ....................POETS ........ —_
( MES) .........9IEFEN ...
..,. ✓ PWGAR).........6......... P GUS .... —_
(SHAMES)......AU.EN ........ ✓_ Roam.................6.6 mum ...... —
IAGE)...........ARNOIO ...... (n"nA�MON) .................ROIH.........7 _—
(GREEN) ........EAMNIBTER.... (COX) ......................9MNSONE .....
(mown ........CATMN........ MAMlIOND).................NHERIDAN .... � -
OAAPQ ..........ONVER....... (SALES) ....................mEFEN .,..... —
MAHa+Ev)......GNHAM ...... ✓ (SN.DARWA.................SUM........✓ —
(CHESSmN) ......GRIFFN.......✓ (SARHERA) .................SMITH ......... —
(YOUNG)........GAMET .......JG MD......................STANTON .....M Ii
(SCOT)).........NEu ......... ✓ MSLER)....................SWAN ........? —(WED .........NELSGN.......�G (WASTROLQ ..............SYLVIA ....... —
(HUNTER) .......PI am ...... (CflrW WFEgNY1MNGREB'N) ..WAMVER...... . _
(BOTH..........8TAMON .....JG (BIGONBEAT...............YIEBMc.SYr:.
(WMSSTflOM) ...mm........ MELSCNI /
...................WEDIN........
ryasuq........NiLscF1 .......41 — — (LAsaq ...................Wasav.......
DISTRICTS (GREEN).................... —
(PLMMM R)......FMNT.........--4z—
(COLT...........SASONE ..... ✓ —
(STANTON) ......ROTH..........
DISTRICTS STA OTHERS
(HART) ..........PLt O .....� SYLVESTER......... / WOODRUFF ... L./(FERRYMM-0.....WMBN:R......— BROWN ............ IDE...........
(STANTON) ......Rom.........JL ANDERSON .........— ANWAR .......—
DISTPRCT Q WSON ..........— DEM I ........—
DAWE9.............= MEMDM....... �
(BARREN) ......sMm ........ ✓ HDDSES ...........j HOHmNEfl....._�'
(PUCKETT) ......EIXiM........ KYLE............... ✓ HOUGH .......
(PLUMMER)......COX .......... UNDER.............✓ HOWARD......
(YOUNG) ........MMET .....,.J` NELSON............ HUM.........(STANTON) ......MOTH......... NmANNB KNOPF........ L
(HAMMOND) .....SHERIDAN....._ _ GOTEN!.............JG LINDSRIOI ...yi
(GREEN) ........WANNER...... .. STREED............ LYNCH........—
DISTWCTII VWCBif ........... STONE........
VONLMNGD! ....... ✓ WASOI .......��
(GREEN ........MAYS..VAMCHLL..... wr............. .� YOUNR .......__
(SKVN..........MAYS.........(ROTH)..........STANTON!AMON ......1_� —
DISMI
B CT13 d T `
(SomeER - YM . . ...
(NELSON) .......WEON........
( A ) .......
MM ......
(STANTON) ......BOTH......
( ANRERA ...... H ........
:2�✓��—_ Cf
—
blSTRICTSI
\v%(MUER) ........SwAN.........
DMMAONOI .....SNERIDAN..... —
(M)GAR) ........PONT31U9....,ly _
(STANTON) ......Rom....... .
(NARRERW ......9MTm ........-(G —
osa9No
11/14/90 JOINT MEETING NOTES
#6(a) - Report of the Joint Chairman
Adoption of resolutions of appreciation for retiring Directors and then
Joint Chairman Catlin called various meetings. SEE ATTACHED REPORT.
Following adoption of resolutions of appreciation, Director Don Smith addressed
the Board. He said he had certainly enjoyed being on the the Sanitation
Districts Board the most of all his commissions. He noted that Director Culver
and he were old-timers on the Board. He said, it has really been a pleasure to
work with this Board and staff and he was going to miss it.
Director Neal agreed with Don Smith. He said this was the most excellent staff
he has ever worked with and the finest Board. It has been a great pleasure.
Thank you for the many hours.
Director Silzel stated he had only served 8 years but shared Don's remark re the
quality of this Board. The Districts have received major recognitions and
awards. It is a pleasure to work with this Board.
Director Arnold said she had been here a very short time, but it has been an
honor and pleasure. She advised that she was relocating and therefore could not
be on the Cypress council any longer.
Director Allen added that this has been one terrific organization to belong to.
He commented that he didn't work as hard during this election and it showed up.
Hoped he would be back in 2 years.
The Chairman announced that plaques would be presented to these Directors at a
later meeting.
#6(b) - Report of the General Manager
No report.
#6(c) - Report of the General Counsel
The General Counsel referred to two memoranda in Directors' folders but had
nothing to add to them. He said he would report during closed session on a few
matters including items of litigation.
#11(a) - Staff report re Job No. P2-42-1
Tom Dawes reported that this project included replacement of 12 drives and
motors with new motors and 10 new pumps. This was required because of AQMD
electrification rule. He showed a few slides with regard to the project. The
new motors are 300-350 hp. They will also allow us to make full use of energy
produced by the central power generation project. The estimated cost of the
project is $16 million. Staff recommended approval of the plans and
specifications.
/12(a) - Report of EIR consultant re Final Supplement No. 1 (re Job No. I-9)
Kris Lindstrom addressed the Board. He advised that they were considering
`. Supplement No. 1 to the Program EIR which addressed the Interplant Pipeline and
Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9. This consists of a new 120-inch pipeline between
Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2 along side the Santa Ana River
levy and through a narrow corridor along the Flood Control Channel. We must
coordinate this project with the County and the Flood Control District. The
project has gone very smoothly with no controversy. He gave a brief slide
presentation. He added that the most important element was mitigation measures
relative to the bike trail along the river. We will construct a temporary bike
trail down the center of the river. We will continue to work with the County
and different agencies for permitting. He said we expect it to go smoothly.
Director Polis asked how much the modification of the bike trail would cost?
Mr. Lindstrom replied $200,000. Polis then asked how long this would take.
Kris advised about 1-1H years; during one dry season but it could extend for
another year.
#13 - Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee
The General Manager reported that the CRR Committee has been working very
closely with staff for over a year to implement those projects of the Wastewater
Management Action Plan adopted by the Boards in 1989. He noted that they had
some express assignments re water conservation, water reclamation and slude
re-use. This is Phase II Sludge Management Implementation Plan.
N14(b)(1)(c) - Extension of interim permit for Stringfellow
Supervisor Roger Stanton requested that his vote in opposition to the motion be
made a matter of record.
#16 - FPC 8 Staff Report re Capital Improvement Program, 1990-92 Series A, COPS
Vice Chairman Mahoney reported that over the past several months the Boards have
been entering into bond issue certificates of participation to finance capital
improvements for the Districts. The Fiscal Policy Committee is making some
recommendations. He said they have met several times and were recommending to
the Board that there be an initial issuance of $100 million in COPS. Referred
to breakdown per District listed on agenda. We are probably going to be going
Into a couple of issuances. It will probably be better to go in for an initial
$100 million rather than borrowing everything now that we will need in the long
run. It will be much better for the Districts. The FPC made three
recommendations: (1) $100 million initial issuance and that it be a variable
rate basis over a 25-year fixed term, (2) Appoint National Westminster Bank PLC
as Letter of Credit Bank; and (3) Appoint Texas Commerce Bank National
Association as Trustee.
The Director of Finance then reported that the actions that evening were the
last official steps to adopt recommendations in Action Plan. One step was to
bring on a Financial Manager. The Boards decided to use Merrill Lynch as the
Senior Underwriter and hired Mudge Rose and Rourke and Woodruff re legal advice.
Have had several committee meetings and a workshop on debt financing which was
attended by 25 Directors. The construction financial plan is 50% borrowing and
50% pay-as-you-go. The FPC feels the Districts have excellent borrowing
potential. He referred to the FPC reports from the two meetings in October. On
-2-
October 17th the FPC discussed the size of the initial issue and terms of the
issue. The Districts published a calendar of events and presentation booklet.
He said they would run through the booklet that night for the Directors. The
October 30th FPC report summarizes the issues and actions to be taken that
evening. Discussed resolutions for each District that will be considered that
night. The resolutions approve several agreements and actions listed in the
agenda (read list).
He then recognized Patti Gorczyca, Financial Manager; Steve Cana, Merrill Lynch
Capital Markets; and Ed Long of Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander & Ferdon.
Patti Gorczyca then addressed the Board. She reported that during the last
three months the Districts' staff and financial team have been developing this
financial program. She expressed their appreciation to the Board for their
support and attendance at a number of meetings. A slide presentation was given
along with her talk which included a summary of the financial program
recommended.
Steve Coma then reviewed the rationale for the fall issue and for future issues.
Patti commented on presentations made to the rating agencies. She said we had
received some positive feeback from them. She also reviewed the selection
criteria used for the Letter of Credit bank. Considered three top-rated banks:
Fuji , National Westminster, and Industrial Bank of Japan. Initial
recommendation was Industrial Bank of Japan but they were going to require the
Districts to establish a special reserve fund. If we agreed to that, that would
be yield restrictive. Therefore, we began discussions with National Westminster
Bank about two weeks ago. She said discussions would conclude tomorrow.
She also reviewed selection criteria for Trustee Bank. Considered Security
Pacific and Texas Commercial. Security Pacific was a little bit less but they
did not have dailies experience and Texas Commercial had considerable
experience.
Patti then recapped recommendations and provisions included in the various
resolutions being considered by each District approving certificates of
participation.
Joint Chairman Catlin commented that he was greatly impressed with staff's
presentation as far as planning is concerned.
Director Swan asked if we were going to issue bonds before next month? Patti
advised that they will be priced on 11/27 or early December. He then asked,
what if we haven't concluded with Westminster Bank? If negotiations do not work
out, as long as you maintain the same quality and approximate pricing should
give this latitude to staff. Asked, do you think that would be a wise idea?
Catlin agreed that they should allow staff the flexibility to pick something
out with the same standards. Directors agreed that the the resolutions be
amended to include this authority if the Districts do not come to an agreement
with National Westminster Bank.
Wedin added that it seems our schedule shows that the Official Statement has
been printed. I assume any Director could look at it if it is available. Gary
Streed advised that it was not back from the printer yet but will be sending one
to Directors.
-3-
Each District then moved and seconded that its appropriate resolution approving
Capital Improvement Program, 1990-92 Series A Certificates of Participation, be
adopted, as amended to provide that, at the direction of the Manager, the
o..� District may substitute for National Westminster Bank PLC, San Francisco
Overseas Bank, an alternate Letter of Credit bank and enter into an agreement
with such alternate bank provided that such alternate bank has credit ratings
similar to or better than National Westminster Bank PLC, and the annual fee
shall not exceed the amount authorized by Section 3(c) of said resolution. Each
resolution was unanimously adopted by the respective District.
#17 - Building Committee
The Director of Engineering reported that the Building Committee reviewed staff
recommendations regarding the laboratory now under construction. They are
requesting to increase the design contract with Boyle Engineering.
The Committee also reviewed the closeout documents for the large warehouse
project. There are some eight buildings. There are a series of change orders
recommended by the Building Committee. Staff concurred with the Committee's
recommendations.
#17 b 5 :
The eneral Counsel reported on his memorandum to the general Manager. He
advised that the Building Committee had been reviewing this for several months.
They have concluded that the professional services of Pulaski 8 Arita fall so
far short of expected level of professional service in this community, and have
caused the Districts a great deal of money. The Building Committee previously
recommended that no action be taken pending hopeful rehabilitation of architect.
It started out favorably and then completely stopped, and we have discovered
more and more errors. Mr. Woodruff recommended that we file notice to the
architect. This recommendation is supported by the Building Committee. No
questions.
Moved, seconded and duly carried to do so.
#18 - Re Job No. J-23-1
Tom Dawes reported that this project is a part of the continuing development of
support facilities for treatment plant expansion. It will sit across the road
from this administration building. It is a two-story structure and will include
25,000 sq. ft. Will house much computer equipment that will monitory treatment
plants and 35 pump stations. Will also have conference roams, training rom,
and has a basement with lockers and showers, etc. The estimated cost of the
project is $3.2 million. Staff recommended approval of the plans and
specifications.
Directors asked if that included furnishings? Tom replied, it includes
partitioning.
#33 - DISTRICTS 7 8 14 re Contract No. 14-1-2
The Director of Engineering reported that this contract is for a double barrel ,
42-inch diameter force main from Bristol Street to Baker. We received 15 bids
in October. The engineer's estimate was $7 million. Bids ranged from $5.7 to
$8 million. Recommended award to Mladen Buntich, the low bidder.
-4-
REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN
NOVEMBER 14 , 1990
1 ) ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS OF APPRECIATION FOR
RETIRING DIRECTORS .
AS YOU KNOW. SEVERAL OF OUR CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS
WILL BE RETIRING FROM THEIR CITY COUNCILS THIS MONTH .
OVER THE YEARS , THESE DIRECTORS HAVE NOT ONLY
PERFORMED THEIR DUTIES AS CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS WITH A
HIGH DEGREE OF PROFESSIONALISM AND DEDICATION , BUT
THEY HAVE ALSO BEEN EQUALLY INVOLVED IN THE WASTEWATER
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OF THE SANITATION DISTRICTS .
I WOULD THEREFORE LIKE TO INTRODUCE FOR THE BOARDS'
CONSIDERATION , ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS EXPRESSING OUR
APPRECIATION TO THESE RETIRING DIRECTORS AND RECOGNIZING
THEIR OUTSTANDING CONTRIBUTIONS AND DEDICATION TO
PUBLIC SERVICE.
ACTIVE DIRECTORS
DIRECTOR'S NAME CITY DISTRICTS) ON BOARD
DON E. SMITH ORANGE 2, 7, 13 & 14 22
JAMES NEAL FOUNTAIN VALLEY 2 & 3 6
TOM MAYS HUNTINGTON BEACH 11 4
ROLAND BIGONGER YORBA LINDA 2 4
WAYNE SILZEL VILLA PARK 2 4
ED ALIEN STANTON 3 2
WES BANNISTER HUNTINGTON BEACH 3 2
MARGARET ARNOLD CYPRESS 3 1
WE WILL HAVE PLAQUES PREPARED AND ASK EACH OF YOU
TO RETURN AT A FUTURE MEETING FOR A FORMAL PRESENTATION.
- ITEM 2 ON NEXT PAGE -
-1-
2) UPCOMING MEETINGS
A . EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE IS
SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 28TH
AT 5:30 P . M.
(INVITE THE FOLLOWING DIRECTOR TO ATTEND:)
BETH GRAHAM
B. CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE - THE
CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE IS
SCHEDULED TO MEET ON THURSDAY , NOVEMBER 29TH
AT 5:30 P. M.
C. BUILDING COMMITTEE - THE BUILDING COMMITTEE WILL
MEET AT THE CALL OF THE CHAIRMAN . - "I aq- vwew
D . JOINT WORKS SELECTION COMMITTEE - THE JOINT WORKS
SELECTION COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON
7:00 #.M .
%4
E . DISTRICTS 6, 7 & t . SELECTION COMMITTEE - THE
�4
SELECTION COMMITTEE FOR DISTRICTS 6, 7 & t`l.
IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON W APO It Q /q D
u
- END OF REPORT -
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 3, 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
ON
NOVEMBER 14, 1990
PptTeiroh
ray 4+,ap.m. o eg�r9
ri m
ORgNGE CO
-t,
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
u
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11. 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was hold on November 14, 1990,
at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts- Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of
Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present
for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11. 13 and 14 as follows:
ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO. 1: x James A. Wahner, Chairman Orma Crank
Charles E. Puckett, Chairman pro tam x Richard B. Edgar
'x Dan Griset —Dan Young
x Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 2: a Iry Pickler, Chairman Fred Hunter
=James Neal, Chairman pro
turn —George—Henry Scott
=Mark Schwing _ W. Medea
x A.B. -Buck- Catlin _Chris Norby
_ x Dan Griset _Dan Young
x William D. Mahoney _Beth Graham
v� x Robert H. Main Norman Culver
x Carrey Nelson __Wayne Wedin
=Arthur G. Newton Norman Z. Eckenrode
x Wayne Silzel —Harold Saldarinl
=Don E. Smith Fred Barrera
x Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 3: x Richard Polls, Chai roan _Eva G. Miner
xJ.R. "Bob° Siefen, Chai man pro two _Dewey Wiles
=Edward L. Allen _David J. Shawver
7—Margaret M. Arnold _Cecilia L. Age
=Wes Bannister Peter Green
=A.B. °Buck• Catlin —_Chris Norby
=Norman Culver Robert H. Main
=Beth Grab= —_William D. Mahoney
x Don R. Griffin _Donna L. Chessen
x Dan Griset Dan Young
=James Neal —_George Scott
x Carrey Nelson _Wayne Wedin
=Iry Pickier _Fred Hunter
x Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
=Charles Sylvia _Robert Wahlstrom
x Edna Wilson Frank Laszlo
DISTRICT NO. 5: x Evelyn Hart, Chai roan Ruthelyn Plummer
x Phil Sansone, Chairman pro tan John C. Cox, Jr.
z Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 6: x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman _Evelyn Hart
x James A. Wanner, Chairman pro tem James M. Ferryman
=Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 7: x Don E. Smith, Chairman Fred Barrera
x Richard Edgar, Chairman pro ten —_Charles E. Puckett
=John C. Cox, Jr. Ruthelyn Plummer
= _
Dan Griset Dan Young
-7--Don R. Roth —Roger Stanton
a Sally Anne Sheridan Barry Hammond
xJames A. Wanner _Harry Green
DISTRICT NO. 11: z Grace Winchell, Chairman Peter Green
a Tom Mays, Chairman pro tan —Jim Silva
xRoger Stanton _Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 13: x Mark Schwing _Roland E. Bigonger
=Wayne Wedin, Chairman pro tem —Fred
Nelson
a Iry Pickler Fred Hunter
x Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
z Don E. Smith. _Fred Barrera
DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chat man _Darryl Miller
v..✓ -a-Sally Anne Sheridan, Chairman pro tem mm_Barry Haond
=Leslie A. Puntious Richard B. Edgar
=Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
=Don E. Smith Fred Barrera
-2-
11/14/90
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager,
Rita J. Brown, Board Secretary, Blake
P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary
G. Streed, Corinne Clawson, Penny
Kyle, Ed Hodges, John Linder, Charles
Nichols, Bob Ooten, Jack Vincent,
Richard von Langen, Chuck Winsor,
Patti Gorczyca, Gary Hasenstab,
Adriana Renescu
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel ,
Clark Ide, Conrad Hohener, Bill Knopf, '
Kris Lindstrom, Phil Stone, Mary Lee,
Bill Fleming, Ed Long, Stephen Coma -0v
} k f 3 * Y f f f t f } k
DISTRICTS 2 & 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file minute excerpt
from the City of Yorba Linda re That the minute excerpt from the City
Board appointments of Yorba Linda appointing Mark
Schwing as alternate Director for the
November 14, 1990 meeting only, be, and is hereby, received and ordered
filed, as follows:
District Active Director Alternate Director
2 Roland E. Bigonger Mark Schwing
13 Henry W. Wedaa Mark Schwing
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman announced that
Adoption of resolutions of several of the current Board members
appreciation for retiring Directors would be retiring from their City
councils this month.
Joint Chairman Catlin then introduced resolutions expressing the Boards'
appreciation to these retiring Directors. s
It was moved, seconded and carried by unanimous acclamation:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt the following resolutions
expressing their appreciation to the retiring Directors and recognizing
their outstanding contributions and dedication to public service:
-3-
11/14/90
Resolution No. Director City District(s)
90-153 Don E. smith Orange 2, 7, 13 & 14
90-177 James Neal Fountain Valley 2 & 3
90-178 Tom Mays Huntington Beach 11
90-179 Roland E. Bigonger Yorba Linda 2
90-180 Wayne Silzel Villa Park 2
90-181 Edward L. Allen Stanton 3
90-182 Wes Bannister Huntington Beach 3
90-183 Margaret Arnold Cypress 3
Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these
minutes.
Retiring Directors Smith, Neal , Silzel , Allen, Bannister and Arnold then
briefly addressed the Boards reflecting fondly on their association with the
Directors and staff.
Joint Chairman Catlin added that plaques were being prepared and would be
formally presented to each of these Directors at a future meeting.
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman reported that a
Report of the Joint Chairman Joint Works Selection Committee was
scheduled to meet on Monday,
November 26th, at 7:00 a.m.
Chairman Catlin then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for
Wednesday, November 28th, at 5:30 p.m. , and invited Director Beth Graham to
attend and participate in the discussions.
He further advised that a Selection Committee meeting for Districts 6, 7 and
14 had also been scheduled for Wednesday, November 28th, immediately
following the Executive Committee meeting.
Mr. Catlin also reported that the Building Committee Chairman had scheduled
a meeting for Thursday, November 29th, at 11:30 a.m.
_ The Joint Chairman added that the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse
Committee was also scheduled to meet on Thursday, November 29th, at
5:30 p.m.
ALL DISTRICTS The Districts' General Counsel
Report of the General Counsel briefly commented on his memoranda
included in the Directors' meeting
folders relative to the status of pending litigation involving
Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. and Universal Circuits, Inc.
Vei -4-
11/14/90
DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held October 10, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ��
DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held October 10, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held October 10, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held October 10, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held October 10, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held October 10, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held October 10, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held October 10, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held October 10, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
11/14/90
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratif cation of
ppa_yymme�nt of o n
and Individua 1� laii That payment of Joint and individual
�. District claims set forth on pages
"A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized
below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts
so indicated.
10/10/90 10/24/90
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint p�erating Fund - $ 685,624.78 $1,108,083.95
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 6,550,169.68 991,895.60
Joint Working Capital Fund - 209,668.37 134,683.06
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 21,063.65 6,943.36
DISTRICT NO. 1 - 2,251.04 613.58
DI TRIS C1 N(72 - 21,408.86 17,646.23
DISTRICT N� - 683,800.42 20,687.92
DISTRICT NO. - 707,187.77 264,122.66
DISTRICT N076 - 320.98 597.30
D IS Ik CT 90-77 - 2,965.86 8,168.91
DI TRIG CT NO. 11 - 6,928.62 8,286.66
DI TRICT NO. 13 - 86.35 21.00
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 1,771.65 4,682.01
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 8 6 JOINT - 18.06 1,326.73
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 8 7 JOIN - 2,479.85 -0-
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 8 14 JOINT - 24.18 5,148.88
8, 5,770.12 2,572,907.85
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing staff to issue a
purchase order to Motorola That staff be, and is hereby,
Communications and Electronic 51
authorized to issue a purchase order
Inc. (Specification No. E-1931 to Motorola Communications and
Electronics, Inc. for Purchase of
Two-Way Radio Equipment (Specification No. E-193) for additional radio
equipment compatible with the Districts' existing Motorola Communications
System, for the negotiated amount of $86,591.00 plus sales tax.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awarding Specification o. P-122 to
Imperial West Chemical Co. That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 90-154,
receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract
for Purchase Of Ferric Chloride, Specification No. P-122, to Imperial West
Chemical Co., at the unit price of $160.11 per dry ton, plus sales tax, for
a one-year period beginning December 1, 1990, with provision for a one-year
extension (estimated annual cost $1,380,225.00). Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
-6-
11/14/90
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 3 to the
plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 3 to the plans
Job No. J-17 and specifications for Central
Laboratory, Job No. J-17, authorizing
a net addition of $18,709.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation
for seven items of additional or deleted work, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 4 to the
plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 4 to the plans
Job No. P1-34-1 and specifications for Gas Handling
Facilities at Reclamation Plant -.
No. 1, Job No. P1-34-1, authorizing an addition of $37,916.00 to the
contract with Ziebarth 8 Alper for five items of additional work, be, and is
hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change rder No. 10 to
the plan and s ecifications for That Change Order No. 10 to the plans
Job No. 1'2- 7 and specifications for Miscellaneous
Modifications and Improvements to
Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Jab No. P2-37, authorizing a net
addition of $108,939.00 to the contract with Ziebarth 8 Alper for 16 items
of additional or deleted work, and granting a time extension of 128 calendar
days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Accepting Job No. PZ- 7 as
complete That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 90-155,
accepting Miscellaneous Modifications and Improvements to Facilities at
Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-37, as complete, authorizing execution of
a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said
resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 1 to the
fans and s ecifications for That Change Order No. 1 to the plans
S ecification Nps. R-033-1 Rebid and specifications for Fuel System
R-033-2 Rebid Job Nos. PZ-40 Improvements at Plant No. 1,
Rebid P1- 7-1 and P1-27-2 Specification No. R-033-1 (Rebid) ;
Fuel System Improvements at Plant
No. 2, Specification No. R-033-2 (Rebid) ; Instrumentation Improvements at _.
Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-40 (Rebid) ; Wastehauler Sampling System at Plant
No. 1, Job No. P1-27-1; and Wastehauler Pump Station at Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-27-2, authorizing an addition of $23,954.00 to the contract with
Schuler Engineering Corporation for one item of additional work and granting
a time extension of 45 calendar days for completion of said additional work,
be, and is hereby, approved.
-7-
11/14/90
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Addendum No. 1 to the
Professional Services Agreement That the Selection Committee
with John Carollo Engineers for certification of the. final negotiated
�..J desi n and construction services fee relative to Addendum No. 1 to the
re Job Nos. PS- and PT-_4F Professional Services Agreement with
John Carollo Engineers for design and
construction services, preparation of operations and maintenance manuals,
and training services re Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1,
Job No. P1-36, and Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Jab
No. P2-42, providing for additional design services to replace and realign
existing 78-inch ocean outfall and modify existing scum collection system,
be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution
No. 90-156, approving Addendum No. 1 to said agreement with John Carollo
Engineers for said additional services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor
plus overhead, plus direct expenses and fixed profit, for an additional
amount not to exceed $180,232.00, increasing the total authorized
compensation from $4,997,841.00 to an amount not to exceed $5,178,073.00.
Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Professional Services
Agreement with Ecosystems That the Selection Committee
Engineering 8 Analyses for certification of the final negotiated
ecological consulting and fee relative to the Professional
statistical data analyses services Services Agreement with Ecosystems
Engineering 8 Analyses for ecological
consulting and statistical data analyses services, be, and is hereby,
received, ordered filed and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution
No. 90-157, approving Professional Services Agreement with Ecosystems
Engineering 8 Analyses for said services, at the rate of $65.00 per hour,
including overhead and profit, for an amount not to exceed $84,000.00, plus
technical and clerical staff services, materials and supplies, and travel
and lodging, for a total amount not to exceed $142,000.00 for a one-year
period beginning November 15, 1990. Said resolution, by reference hereto,
is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the General Manager to
employ two Laboratory Scientists at That the General Manager be, and is
the top step of the salar ran a to hereby, authorized to employ two
work in the Technical Services Laboratory Scientists at the top step
Laboratory Division of the salary range (currently
$5,061.00 per month) for this
position classification to work in the Districts' Technical Services
Department/Laboratory Division.
11/14/90
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re Electrification of Pump
Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2,
Job No. P2-42-1
Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering �..�
reported that South Coast Air
Quality Management District (SCAQMD) regulations require replacement of
existing internal combustion engines with electric motor drives. He
briefly reviewed the proposed project for Electrification of Pump
Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P242-1, that will modify
existing systems to meet the requirements of SCAQMD and allow the
continuous operation of the Central Power Generation System facilities
at Plant No. 2, currently under construction.
Approving plans and specifications Moved, seconded and duly carried:
for
Jab No. P2-42-1
That the Boards of Directors
hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-158, approving plans and specifications
for Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-42-1, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date
for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby
made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re approval of Final
upplement No. 1 to Program EIR On
Collection, Treatment and Disposal
Facilities Master Plan re
Interplant Pipeline and Utility
Corridor, Job No. I-9
Verbal report of EIR consultant The Chair recognized Kris
Lindstrom, EIR consulant, who
reported that Supplement No. 1 to the Program EIR on the Collection,
Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan addressed the impacts of
the Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9. This
project consists of a new 120-inch diameter pipeline between
Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2 which runs along the
Santa Ana River levy and through a narrow corridor along the flood
control channel . He stated that the Districts are coordinating the
project with the County of Orange and the Orange County Flood Control
District because of the impending project to widen the Santa Ana River.
It was pointed Out that there had been no controversy thus far with
regard to the proposed project.
Mr. Lindstrom stated that the most important element of the
Supplemental EIR was the adoption of mitigation measures in connection
with the bicycle trail along the Santa Ana River. The Districts will
construct a temporary bicycle trail down the center of the river to be
used until completion of Job No. I-9, which he estimated would be
approximately one to one and one-half years. The approximate cost of
the temporary bicycle trail is $200,000.
The consultant reviewed prior actions taken by the Boards in connection
with Supplement No. 1 in compliance with CEQA requirements and listed
the actions appearing on the agenda that evening which included
approval of Final Supplement No. 1 to said EIR.
-9-
11/14/90
Receive and file Staff Re ort and Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Summary re Final upplement No. 1
to Program EIR That the Staff Report and Summary
dated November 5, 1990 re Final
Supplement No. 1 to Program Environmental Impact Report on Collection,
Treatment and Disposal Facilities re Interplant Pipeline and Utility
Corridor, Job No. I-9, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
Receive, file and a rove Final Moved, seconded and duly carried:
upplemen No. 1 to Program EIR
That the Final Supplement No. 1
to Program Environmental Impact Report on Collection, Treatment and
_ Disposal Facilities re Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job
No. I-9, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors do hereby certify that
said Final Supplement No. 1 to Program Environmental Impact Report has
been completed in compliance with the State and Districts' Guidelines
Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as
amended.
Certifying Final Supplement No. 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
to Program EIR
That the Boards of Directors
hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-159, certifying said Final Supplement
No. 1 to Program Environmental Impact Report; making certain findings
relating to significant environmental effects identified in the
Supplement; adapting a statement of overriding considerations; adopting
mitigation measures and monitoring plan; and authorizing the filing of
a Notice of Determination re said project. Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and approve written
report of the Conservation, That. the written report of the
Reclamation and Reuse Committee Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse
Committee's meeting on October 25,
1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Phase II Sludge
Management Implementation Plan That the Phase II Sludge Management
Implementation Plan be, and is
hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the Selection Committee
to solicit proposals for initial That the Selection Committee be, and
consultin services to assist in is hereby, authorized to solicit
implementation of Phase II Judge proposals, in accordance with the
Management Implementation Plan Boards' adopted procedures, for
initial consulting services to assist
in implementation of the Phase II Sludge Management Implementation Plan.
-10-
11/14/90
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Amending lassification and
Comoensat on Resolution No. 7 - 0, That the Boards of Directors hereby
as amended, authorizing addition of adopt Resolution No. 90-160, amending
one Principal Environmental Classification and Compensation
Specialist Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, �✓
authorizing the addition of one
Principal Environmental Specialist ($3419/$4444 per month) to the
Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Division to help administer the
Districts' sludge management program. Said resolution, by reference hereto,
Is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and approve written
report of the Executive Committee That the written report of the
Executive Committee's meeting on
October 24, 1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re Interim Discharge Permit
for the StringfeHow Waste Disposal
site
Receive and file letter from the Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Santa Ana WatershedProject
Authority re extension of interim That the letter from the Santa
permit for Strin fellow Waste Ana Watershed Project Authority
Disposal ite dated August 29, 1990, requesting
an extension of the interim
permit to discharge pretreated groundwater from the Stringfellow Waste
Disposal Site to the Districts' sewerage system, be, and is hereby,
received and ordered filed.
Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Staff Report dated October 17, 1990 relative to the request
for Stringfellow permit extension, be, and is hereby, received and
ordered filed.
Directing staff to authorize the Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Santa Ana Watershed Project
Authority to issue an extension of That the staff be, and is hereby,
the interim California Department authorized and directed to
of Health Services permit for authorize the Santa Ana Watershed
Stringfellow Waste Disposal Site Project Authority to issue an
extension of the interim
California Department of Health Services (DOHS) permit for discharge of
pretreated groundwater from the Stringfellow Waste Disposal Site to the . .
Districts' sewerage system from December 31, 1990 to December 31, 1993,
and providing that said extension be subject to continuing satisfactory
progress by OOHS and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in
addressing the long-term clean-up solution for the Stringfellow site.
Supervisor Roger R. Stanton requested that his vote in apposition to
the motion be made a matter of record.
-11-
11/14/90
Autho rig
ln modification of the Moved, seconded and duly carried:
con ions of the Stringfellow
permit That the Boards of Directors do
hereby authorize modification of
the conditions of the Stringfellow permit to remove duplicate language
and reorganize the sequence of its sections and changing the daily
Inspection and monitoring requirement to "once each time a
tested-and-approved, sealed effluent tank is discharged, or on a daily
basis, whichever is less frequent".
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Aut orizing he elec ion ommi ttee
to negotiate a rofessional That the Selection Committee be, and
Services Agreement with James M. is hereby, authorized to negotiate a
Montgomery En sneers to prepare an Professional Services Agreement with
emissions inventory report and James M. Montgomery Engineers to
health risk assessment re or re prepare an emissions inventory report
AB 2588 aliforn a it Toxics and health risk assessment report in
"Hot Spots' Information and order to comply with AB 2588,
Assessment Act of 1987 California Air Toxics "Hot Spots"
Information and Assessment Act
of 1987, for consideration by the Boards.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Amendin Resolution No. 90-26
re lassificat on ano Compensation That the Boards of Directors hereby
Resolu ion No. 79-20, as amended, adopt Resolution No. 90-161, amending
re Engineering and Scientific Resolution No. 90-26 which amends
Intern Program Classification and Compensation
Resolution No. 79-20, as amended,
Increasing the authorized annual expenditure for the Engineering and
Scientific Intern Program from $60,000.00 to an amount not to exceed
$105,000.00, to allow up to seven currently-employed college students to
work part-time during the school year. Said resolution, by reference
hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and approve written
report of the Fiscal Policy That the written report of the Fiscal
Committee Policy Committee's meeting on October 30,
1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered
filed and approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file Annual Audit
Report submitted by KPMG Peat, That the Annual Audit Report
Marwick, Main & Company, Certified submitted by (KPMG) Peat, Marwick,
Public Accountants Main & Company, Certified Public
Accountants, for the year ending
June 30, 1990, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
-12-
11/14/90
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re Capita ' Nov
Pra ram 199� Series A
Certifica es of Participa ion
Verbal r ad o aiscol slic Director William Mahoney,
omitt sfFf caPtant Chairman of the Fiscal Policy
finance team Committee, reported that the
Committee had been working for
the last several months with the Districts' staff/consultant finance
team and the Boards regarding the issuance of certificates of
participation to help finance the Districts' capital improvements in
accordance with the debt financing provisions of the Districts'
long-range financial plan approved by the Boards in 1989 as part of the
30-year wastewater management action/Master Plan called "2020 VISION".
He then briefly reviewed the actions that had been taken to date and
the Committee' s recommendations on the Series A issue.
The Director of Finance further reported on the debt financing program
initial issue. Mr. Streed noted that the "2020 VISION" Financial Plan
recommended a change from pay-as-you-go (connection fee) financing to a
combination of pay-as-you-go and debt financing for capital
improvements.
He advised that the Fiscal Policy Committee had submitted several
recommendations which the Executive Committee had endorsed and which
have been adopted by the Boards. These actions include:
. Addition of a Financial Manager to staff in lieu of using a
consultant financial advisor
• Determination to negotiate the debt issue transactions
. Selection of Merrill Lynch Capital Markets as Manager/Senior
Underwriter
. Selection of Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander and Ferdon as
co-Bond Counsel with Rourke & Woodruff
In addition, the Committee expanded its membership to include
representatives from each District when discussing debt issues; and
sponsored a Directors' debt financing workshop which was attended by 25
Board members.
The Director of Finance reiterated that at their October 17th meeting,
the Fiscal Policy Committee considered the specific size and terms of
the initial borrowing scheduled for November 1990. The Committee's . .
recommendation was forwarded to the Executive Committee and was
Included in that Committee's October 24, 1990 report to the Boards.
The Committee also met on October 30, 1990 to consider the final
actions pertaining to the issue which are set forth in the Committee's
report.
-13-
11/14/90
Mr. Streed then introduced Patti Gorczyca, the Districts' Financial
Manager; Steve Coma, of Merrill Lynch Capital Markets; and Ed Long of
Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander 8 Ferdon which, along with other members
of staff and the General Counsel 's office, comprise the Districts'
staff/consultant finance team. Utilizing slides members of the finance
team then reviewed the proposed debt financing program and the initial
"Capital Improvement Program, 1990-92 Series A Certificates of
Participation" issue as outlined in the material included with the
Executive Committee's report of October 24, 1990, previously provided
to Directors, and summarized as follows:
- $100 Million Certificates of Participation (Capital Improvement
Program, 1990-92 Series A):
District No. Amount
1 $ 9,260,000
2 26,250,000
3 28,370,000
5 8,480,000
6 6,920,000
7 9,810,000
11 6,570,000
13 340,000
14 2 000,000
100,000,000
- Variable Interest Rate
- 25-Year Maturity
- Reimburse Reserves for 1989-90 Capital Outlay
- Subsequent 1990-91 Issue in the Spring 1991
- Use Industrial Bank of Japan (IBJ) for Letter of Credit bank.
IBJ subsequently requested a reserve clause which the financial
team believes is unwarranted and thus the Committee is now
recommending National Westminster Bank.
- Use Texas Commerce Bank as Trustee for an annual administration
fee of $7,500 plus annual transaction fees estimated to range
between $15,000 and $25,000.
Resolutions have been prepared for consideration by each District to
implement the recommendations. There are several actions included in
the resolutions which were necessary for a variable interest rate
transaction and which delegate some authority within parameters set by
the Boards. They include:
`„i -14-
11/14/90
- Approve several agreements which are on Fite in the
Board Secretary's Office, as follows:
° Trust Agreement...... .... .Instructions for Trustee Bank
° Acquisition Agreement.... .Each District agrees to fund project
° Assignment Agreement......Allows Trustee to pay investors
° Purchase Contract....... ..Promise by Merrill Lynch to buy COPS
• Remarketing Agreement.....Compensates Merrill Lynch for selling
COPS periodically as interest rates
and investors change
° Reimbursement Agreement...Terms of Letter of Credit
- Authorize execution and delivery of COPS
- Authorize the General Manager and General Counsel to complete the
above documents subsequent to the negotiation process and the
following limits:
° Maximum principal not to exceed $100 million
• Initial interest rate not to exceed 8%
' The Letter of Credit fee shall not exceed .30%
($3.00 per $1,000) per annum of the amount of such letter
° Term shall not exceed 25 years (August 1, 2015)
° The Underwriter' s discount shall not exceed .595%
($5.95 per $1.000)
- Approve and authorize distribution of the Preliminary and the
Final Official Statement
- Appoint Texas Commerce Bank National Association as Trustee
(estimated annual fee $22,500 to $32,500)
- Appoint National Westminster Bank, PLC, as Letter of Credit Bank
(in place of the originally-recommended Industrial Bank of Japan
with which terms could not be reached)
- Authorize execution of necessary documents to effect transactions
The Director of Finance added that upon approval by the respective
Boards, the financial team will proceed to take the initial issue to
market for implementation of the long-range capital and financial plans
included in the "2020 VISION" Master Plan. A report on the marketing
will be made to the full Boards at the December meeting.
The Directors then entered into a general discussion of the proposed
certificates of participation issue during which several items were
clarified and questions answered.
It was reiterated that originally the Industrial Bank of Japan had been
selected as the Letter of Credit bank. However, they advised that they
would require the Districts to establish a special reserve fund. Staff
noted that this is unwarranted and would be yield restrictive to the
Districts and, therefore, began discussions with National Westminster
Bank around the first of November. Ms. Gorczyca advised that a
decision regarding appointment of National Westminster Bank as Letter
of Credit bank was scheduled to be made the following day.
-15- �1.
11/14/90
In order to adhere to the schedule for issuance of the COPS, Directors
suggested that staff be given the authority to select an alternate
Letter of Credit bank If an agreement was not reached with National
Westminster Bank, as long as the same criteria and standards were used
to select the alternate bank. It was agreed that the section of the
resolutions appointing the Letter of Credit bank be revised to reflect
this authority.
EACH DISTRICT Moved, seconded and duly carried
Approving Capital mprovement by each respective District:
Program, 1990-92 Series A
Certificates of Participation That its Board of Directors does
hereby adopt the following
resolution approving the Capital Improvement Program, 1990-92 Series A
Certificates of Participation, pursuant to the Boards ' adopted
long-range financial plan, as amended to provide that, at the direction
of the Manager, the District may substitute for National Westminster
Bank PLC, San Francisco Overseas Bank, an alternate Letter of Credit
bank and enter into an agreement with such alternate bank provided that
such alternate bank has credit ratings similar to or better than
National Westminster Bank PLC, and the annual fee shall not exceed the
amount authorized by Section 3(c) of said resolutions:
DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. COP MAXIMUM AMOUNT
1 90-162-1 $ 9,260,000
2 90-163-2 26,250,000
3 90-164-3 28,370,000
5 90-165-5 8,480,000
6 90-166-6 6,920,000
7 90-167-7 9,810,000
11 90-168-11 8,570,000
13 90-169-13 340,000
14 90-170-14 2,000,000
Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these
minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive file and a rove written
report of the Build Committee That the written report of the
Building Committee's meeting on
October 30, 1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
MR
Addendum No. 3 to the
Professional Services Agreement That the Boards of Directors hereby
with Boyle Engineering Corporation adopt Resolution No. 90-171,
re design of Job No. J-17 approving Addendum No. 3 to the
Professional Services Agreement with
Boyle Engineering Corporation relative to design of Central Laboratory, Job
No. J-17, providing for additional design services relative to the interior
of the laboratory, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, for an
additional amount not to exceed $150,000.00, increasing the total authorized
compensation from $491,703.00 to an amount not to exceed $641,703.00. Said
resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
-16-
11/14/90
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing staff to negotiate
change orders to re the plans and That staff be, and is hereby,
ns specificatio Job No. J-i7 authorized to negotiate change orders
to the plans and specifications for
Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17, to provide for deletion of the existing
casework, modifications to the HVAC, power and other utilities, and the
substitution of new casework, for future consideration by the Boards.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing staff to proceed with
interim existing laboratory That staff be, and is hereby,
modifications and negotiate authorized to proceed with interim
Purchase of Twa Labo rotor Trailers existing laboratory modifications and ' .
Specification No. E-194 to negotiate the Purchase of Two
Laboratory Trailers (Specification
No. E-194) for an amount not to exceed $118,735.00.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
AoDroy ng Change Order No. 7 to the
plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 7 to the plans
Job No. J-20 and specifications for Warehouse and
Maintenance Building and Oil Storage
and Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20, authorizing a net addition of
$204,087.60 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for 37 items of
additional or deleted work, and granting a time extension of 145 calendar
days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 8 to the
plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 8 to the plans
Job No. J-20 and specifications for Warehouse and
Maintenance Building and Oil Storage
and Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20, assessing liquidated damages for
115 days at $500.00 per day, for a total deduction of $57,500.00 from the
contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 9 to the
plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 9 to the plans
Job No. J-20 and specifications for Warehouse and
Maintenance Building and Oil Storage
and Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20, authorizing an adjustment of
engineer' s quantities for a total of $32,463.50 to the contract with
J. R. Roberts Corporation, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Accepting Jab No. J-20 as complete . .
That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 90-172, accepting Warehouse and Maintenance Building
and Oil Storage and Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20, as complete,
authorizing execution of a Final Closeout Agreement and filing of a Notice
of Completion. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part
of these minutes.
17
11/14/90
ALL DISTRICTS Following a brief report by the
Authorizing the ene ral aunsel to General Counsel on the problems
file a claim for professional encountered with the architectural
negligence against Pulaski and design of Jab Nos. J-7-4 and J-20, it
Arita, Inc., architects for Job was moved, seconded and duly carried:
No J-7-4 and J-20
That the General Counsel be, and is
hereby, authorized to file a claim for professional negligence against
Pulaski and Arita, Inc., and/or their successor firm, pertaining to the
design of the Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4, and Warehouse
and Maintenance Building and Oil Storage and Dispensing Improvements, Job
No. J-20; and to take any other appropriate action in pursuit of the
Districts' claim including engagement of architectural/engineering experts
for an independent opinion and the filing of legal proceedings.
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re Control Center/Operations
and Maintenance Building, Job
No. J-23-1
Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering
reported that the Control
Center/Operations and Maintenance Building is part of the continuing
development of support facilities for the treatment plant expansion.
The 25,000 square foot building will be the hub of all maintenance and
control activities and will replace the existing outdated and
undersized Control Center which has been in operation for 39 years.
The building will contain training rooms, conference facilities,
Operations and Maintenance Division's supervisors' offices, shower and
locker roams, lunch room, control center, computer room, and a
facilities/equipment plans and catalog library. All monitored
functions in both plants will be relayed to the new control center
where staff will observe and control all critical aspects of the
Plant's operation as well as those of outlying pump stations.
Mr. Dawes advised that the Building Committee reviewed the plans and
specifications at their meeting on October 30th. The estimated Cost of
the project is $3.2 million. Staff recommended approval of the plans
and specifications.
Following a question about the estimated square footage Cost of the
proposed Job No. J-23-1 project, the Joint Chairman requested that the
Building Committee review the cost estimate.
Approving plans and specifications Moved, seconded and duly carried:
for Job No. J-23-1
That the Boards of Directors
hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-173, approving plans and specifications
for Control Center/Operations and Maintenance Building, Job No. J-23-1,
and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt
of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part
of these minutes.
.,� -18-
11/14/90
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
onvene in close session pursuan
to Government ode Sections 5495 The Boards convened in closed session
and 54957. at 8:40 p.m. pursuant to Government
Code Sections 54956.9 and 54957.6.
ALL DISTRICTS At 9:23 p.m. the Boards reconvened in
Reconvene in regular session regular session.
ALL DISTRICTS In closed session, the General Manager
A rovin settlement of case and General Counsel reported on the
No. 4 9264 I.U.O.E Local 501 settlement of litigation entitled
AFL-CIO, vs uaunty. ,anitation I.U.O.E. , Local 501 AFL-CIO, vs.
Districts of Orange County re County anitation Districts of Orange
Alan Gandall Count 'ran'
ran a Count Superior Court
ase No. 489264, re Alan Gandall , -
wherein the Districts were represented by Attorney Lee Paterson of the firm
of Sonnenschein, Nath 8 Rosenthal . The substance of the settlement, wherein
the Districts, after an arbitration hearing, were found to be in breach of
their Memorandum of Understanding with the Employees' Union, was that the
Districts would be responsible to respond in damages to the individual
employee.
Specifically, the Boards approved the Settlement Agreement, as recommended
by Counsel .
DISTRICT 2 In closed session, the General
Approving settlement of Case Counsel reported on the settlement of
No. 53-77-90, County Sanitation litigation entitled County Sanitation
District N0. 2 vs. Southern District No. 2 vs. Southern California
California Gas company, at al . Gas Company, at al . , Orange County
and authorizing the General Counsel Superior Court Case No. 53-77-90.
to seek recovery of Districts' He reported that in accordance with
losses from design engineer, BSI prior reviews to the Executive
Committee and the Boards, he had
achieved a settlement of the District' s claim against its general
contractor, the subcontractor and the Gas Company by the acceptance of the
sums of $9,000 from Mladen Buntich Construction Co. and $12,500 from Elmore
Pipejacking, and he had just received an offer from the Southern California
Gas Company of $10,000.
Counsel recommended approval of the settlement with Southern California Gas
Company, and further reported on his discussions with the District's
consulting design engineer, BSI. He indicated that in accordance with prior
actions, BSI had not been brought into the lawsuit, but the discovery of
recent evidence establishes some apparent responsibility on the part of the
design engineer. General Counsel recommended that he be authorized to
negotiate with BSI to effect a settlement prior to naming them as a party to
the litigation.
After a brief discussion, it was approved the the General Counsel was to
seek the recovery of all outstanding differences between the amount of
District loss and the amounts received in settlement from other parties,
from the design engineer, BSI.
-19
11/14/90
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:23 p.m., November 14, 1990.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:23 p.m. , November 14, 1990.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving pipeline license
a reemspent with Southern Pacific That the Board of Directors hereby
Tranortation ompany SPTC re adapts Resolution No. 90-174-3,
Contract No. 3-24-2 approving pipeline license agreement
with Southern Pacific Transportation
Company (SPTC) required in connection with construction of the Lampson
Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-24-2; and authorizing payment to SPTC in
the amount of $510.00 for said right-of-way. Said resolution, by reference
hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:23 p.m. , November 14, 1990.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 1 to the plans
Contract No. 5-35-1 and specifications for South Coast
Trunk Sewer, Phase I , Contract
No. 5-35-1, authorizing an addition of $26,195.00 to the contract with
W. H. Ebert Corporation for four items of additional work, and granting a
time extension of six calendar days for completion of said additional work,
be, and is hereby, approved.
DISTRICT 5
Actions re Contract No. 5- 3 and
Contract No. 5-34
Authorizing staff to negotiate an Moved, seconded and duly carried:
- agreement with the City of Newport
Beach re cooperative project for That staff be, and is hereby,
construction of City improvements authorized to negotiate an
in District's contract agreement with the City of
Newport Beach for a cooperative
project to install raised medians along Pacific Coast Highway,
requested by the City, In conjunction with the District's construction
contract for Improvements to Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract
No. 5-33, and Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Contract
No. 5-34.
-20-
11/14/90
Authorizin the Select ion Committee Moved, seconded and duly carried:
to negotiate Addendum o. to the
Professional Services Agreement That the Selection Committee be,
with Robert Bein William Frost & and 1s hereby, authorized to
Associa te s for desi n of Contract negotiate Addendum No. 3 to the
Nos. 5-33 and 5- 4 Professional Services Agreement
with Robert Bein, William Frost &
Associates for design of Improvements to Bay Bridge Pump Station,
Contract No. 5-33, and Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer,
Contract No. 5-34, to provide for additional design and surveying
services for abandonment of the Corona del Mar Pump Station,
Installation of an interim pump station and changes requested by
CALTRANS and the City of Newport Beach.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of .
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:23 p.m. , November 14, 1990.
DISTRICTS 6 7 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the elec ion ommittee
to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the That the Selection Committee be, and
Professional Services Agreement is hereby, authorized to negotiate
with Boyle Engineering Corporation Addendum No. 2 to the Professional
re design of Contract Nos. 14-1-1A, Services Agreement with Boyle
14-1-1B, 14-1-2 and 6-12 Engineering Corporation for design of
Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from
Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A; Baker-Gisler
Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road, Contract No. 14-1-1B;
Baker Force Mains, from Main Street Pump Station to Bristol Street, Contract
No. 14-1-2; and Fairview Relief Sewer, Contract No. 6-12, to provide for
additional design and construction support services required because of
needed sewer alignment modifications and wage escalations due to delays in
the final design of Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant
No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:23 p.m. , November 14, 1990.
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:23 p.m. , November 14, 1990.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ordering Annexation No. 133 - Pell
Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby
adopts Resolution No. 90-175-7,
ordering annexation of 1.0 acres of territory to the District in the
vicinity of Cowan Heights Drive and Fox Spring Road in unincorporated County
territory (Annexation No. 133 - Pell Annexation to County Sanitation
District No. 7). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a
part of these minutes.
-21-
11/14/90
DISTRICTS 7 & 14
Actions re Baker Farce mains from
Main Street Pum tation to Bristol
treet, Contract No. 14-1-2
`J
Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering
briefly reviewed the project for
construction of dual 42-1nch diameter force mains between Bristol
Street and the Main Street Pump Station. The project was designed with
two force mains to minimize long-tern pumping costs while providing the
reliability of a second conduit should one conduit ever fail . Included
In this two-mile long project is a tunnel under the San Diego Freeway
on the west side of the John Wayne Airport property.
Mr. Dawes advised that 15 bids were received ranging from $5.7 million
to $8 million. Staff recommended award to the low bidder, Mladen
Buntich Contruction Co. , Inc.
Awardin Contract No. 14-1-2 to Moved, seconded and duly carried:
M a en Buntich Construction o.,
Inc. That the Boards of Directors
hereby adopt Resolution
No. 90-176, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and
awarding contract for Baker Farce Mains, from Main Street Pump Station
to Bristol Street, Contract No. 14-1-2, to Mladen Buntich Construction
Co., Inc. , in the total amount of $5,773,395.00. Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:25 p.m. , November 14, 1990.
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:25 p.m. , November 14, 1990.
Secretary of a Boards of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14
-22-
f
FUND NO 9199 — JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/03/90 PAGE I
REPORT NUMBER AP43 )
COUNTY SANITATION UISIRICVR OF DRIEST
CLAIMS PAID 10/10/90 PQ$TIN6 DATE 10/18/90
WARRANT
109756 A-1 FENCE CO.. INC. $1.488.00 FENCING
109757 ACIA
10975E A CORPORATION Q;19H 59' ORUGB "<'
109759 ADVANCED
ANCES COMPU7ERPR OOUCTSr).ND aSO.Oq COMPUTER NARONAAB
109761 AIR MANAGEMENT $619.04 REFUND USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT
109762 AIR COLD SUPPLY INC. S31.118 ELECTRICAL PART
109763 AIR PRODUCTS0 —O S le
109764 LEASING ASSOC IATES/ALLSTA TE "' $25.00 LEASE VBXICLR CNARGB:
109765 ALLERGAN PHARMACEUTICAL Y3S463.6 p. REFUNp UBBRY66DVeRPAYNBNT
109767 AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY $65.88 BATTERIES "ua ,:
10976E BLAKE P. ANDERSON $50.29 MEETING EXPENSE
09769 AP CO VALVE 6 PRIMER CO VA VB P
109770 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $E�3S6 71 NOTICBS G as ,
109771 ARATEN SERVICES, INC. t'.(2908 58 1 UNIFORM RENTALS
INSTR ENT
109773 AMSA - CORP. OF COASTAL AGENCY $98.00 REOIBTRATION
m 1O977A FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $61.366.12 GRIT REMOVAL M.0.7-13-88 P
109775 SAFETY SUPPLIES
_ 1097T6 BA NN;Q� ANER CAC eA.S C t �51♦e 3„ 801G1 3 COUP RBG RET. C.O.P
'99,
109777 P.Y, BAROTTI AND A230BARTER SCIENTIFIC C. F }B7.00. CONBTRUC7I0N,SS • CE' P1-S{ 2 P2
r,.. .t R
109779 RAYLESS STATIONERS $171.12 OFFICE SUPPLIES
n 109780 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $56.00 RADIATOR REPAIR
09 - TRUCK PARTS
109782 ' TXE BOND BUYER `5150.00 OCESCRIPTIDN "
109783 BORLAND. INTERNATIONIL i158.95 COMPUTER NO"LEPTYARE: .)1,
CIA - _ c
109785 BRENNER-FIEDLER S ASSOC.. INC. t996.13 MMCMANICAL PARTS
109786 BRITHINEE ELECTRIC 51.075.93 X16CTRIC MOTOR �S
109TB B OYH 6 CAL L LAB S VIC68
109708 BROWN A CALDWELL CONSULT � RrT3.729.33 ENGINEERING SSRy4gp J-39.P3 3T m
109789 THE BUREAU OF NATIDNAL AF IAS109790 ... .�
fr {1.013.20 PUBLICATION a e ,
C ayppLxijl
109791 BUTIER ENGINEERING, INC. 365.000.00 SETTLEMENT N.O. 1 -20-90
109792 6ARY G. STREEU $1.1A0.A9 PETTY CABN REIMBURSEMENT
09 MEMBERSHIP FEES <
119794 CS COMPANY SBt9t3.01 ,. VALVE PAATAI.
109793
CAL FLEM ;NC. 2.500.00 AXTUND USER PBS OV 1 '
BA�AYMBNT +Ih
r ' SUPPLIES_.. .
109797 CALTROL . INC. $1.767.26 INSTRUMENT PARTS
10919E CA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY $4,692.60 OCEAN MONITORING - BIOASSAY STUDIES
109799 PUBLICSUBSCRIPTION - PROFESIONAL JOURNAL
109800 SYRED ACCOUNTINS OFFICE '' {2130 D.00 SMA® FEES
109 1 C40LIFORNIA TAXPAYERS- ASSOC. '. �.,°' S9B.00 SUBSCRIPTION - TECNGXCRL JOURNAL
a
FUND NO 9299 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 20/35/90 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP.3 )
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 10/10/90 POSTING DATE 10/10/90
WARRANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
109802 CAROLLO-BOYLE ENGINEERS $1.952.02 ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 09-125
109803 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS il9 9I0.S7 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-15
A CENT CENTEL COMMUNICAT ONS SYSTEM f1.N2 p.17
109805 CENTURY SAFETY JUST.. ►'BUPP. fAR 6.23 EAFBTY HOPPLIEO� • )
109806 YARDLEY INSTRUMENTS S40,26 INSTRUMENT PARTS
109807 CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC. $13.215.74 0 SHL
10980E CHROME CRANKSHAFT. INC. $1.280.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
109809 CLEAN-EX JANITORIAL SUPPLY t 0 .30 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
98 COMPRESSOR COMPONENT OF CALIF f1.305.06 -
109911 COMPUTER BAY $1,032.62. COMPUTER HARDWARE )
109812 COMPUSERVE $17.59 COMPUTER SERVICES.
209813 CON-WAY WESTERN EMPRESS f73.61I'VEIGENT
109814 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. t1.957.1% BLECTRICAL SUPPLIES
109815 CONTINENTAL CMERI GL CO $5,669.50 CHLORINE M.O.10-11-89
109816 CONTINENTAL 6RAPHIr • S1A.009.73 �L08F'7[SNT'IN -
109817 COOPER INDUSTRIES. INC'. - F929.57 ENGINE PARTS .
109218 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC - S1.590.Be ELECTRIC SUPPLING
109829 CRANE VEYOR CORP. 52.613.67
pxpr-
109820 CHEMICAL PROCESSORS. INC. $1.165.72 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
f7l 109821 CRYSTAL CLEAR YINOOY MA WINDOW CLEANING
Z 09822 CALIFORNIA CHAMBER Of COMMERCE i'- 889.0 -
109823 RANI ELS TIRE SERVICE " S $26.54 TIMES
trJ ]0982A N.A. O-ARCT COMPANY F: $151.24 TRUCE: PARTS
-i 709825 TOM DAMES S49.37 MEET NO
109826 DETAILS. INC. t2.663.20 g8PIOND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT )�
309827 DEN-PAR SALES S SERVICE tl 360.5 HANHOLE COVERS
i 10982E D 2UgIK AND OR CS CD. - b ` i22p.6AVALVES
N 199929 OIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES:. ( f157.07 PRINTING
109830 D161TAL EQUIPMENT CORP. " f3A5.e8 SERVICE AGREEMENT
109931 DDRADO ENTERPRISES. INC. $6.950.00 �I
109832 DORR-OLIVER. INC. f1.957.91 MECHANICAL PARTS )�
109833 DUNKEL BROS. MACH MOVING St,590.51 SPACE RENTAL J-29A
109834 DURA TECH PROCESSES - ' i122.96CURB F,
109835 O-VALS SALES cc� $190.81 FITTINGS
PARTS
)
_1098 6 E iINSTRUMENTS, 2! 3965.13 ST:M1If/ENT.7TS
109837 EIN CD/NSS SUPPLY t1.636.25 G IN . '.)
109839 ENSECO-CRL $1.200.00 OFFICE OCEAN SAMPLING
109839 EASTMAN. INC. $623.10
10981 W. H. EBERT CORP. - $749.574.90 LMNUTHV�11014 D-J - -
109841 ENCHANTER. INC. iiA.B00.00 OCEAN MONITORING H.0.3-10-90
109842 ERNST i YOUNG �33.U5.Op PROP680IONAL SERVICES
109843 FMC CORP. SI00.00 TmuC.-
1098A. FARR SALES i SERVICE $1.272.79 FILTERS
109B45 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. S AIR FREIGHT
t 98A6 FERRELLGAS - ." f22.96 Pwr -
369697 FILTER SUPPLY CO. Ti S039.09 ENGINE PARTS
� t
' FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/03/96 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRTrTs OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 10/10/90 POSTING DATE 10/10/90 „R
WARRANT N0, VENDOR AM .
109848 FIRE MASTER $1,153.58 SAFETY SUPPLIES
109849 F SC MCR t PORTER CO. CHLORINATION PARTS
109fl50 F SMER SCIENTIFIC VD. i"S#11.3# ' SUPPLIES
119851 FLAT l VERTICAL CONCRETE 4143.50 . CONCRETE CUTT11jI3 y<r? )
109852 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $6.636.49 WATER USE
101853 FOMRORO CO. $56.46 INSTRUMENT PART
1098854 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $1.644.52 HARDWARE/LUMBER � .)
109E 55
6ENERAL BIND INS CORP. OFFICE MACHINE
109856 GENERAL ELECTRIC CQ. f227#'#9.9# INS PART
( �,•j'"
109857 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. ) 621
961.39. '" TELEPHONE S88VICHE )
10985E ' MECHANICAL PART6
109859 DON GREEK E ASSOCIATES $14.202.45 SURVEYING BURVICeB REB -
109860 GRINNELL CORPORATION $931.16 VALVE )
109861 MACH COMP AN LAB SUPPLIES
109B62 NARRIN6 TON INDU8TRIAL PLASTIC - ". 'iS.69 OAVOB '
I09863 HATCH { NIP%. INC. {{EOBB.SO ENGINE PARTS )
109B6A HAULA AY CO $' DIN RENTALS'=.
109865 F.L. MAYN I INC. 1213.56 FILTER
f37 109866 IRWIN HAYDOCK fA4.00 MEETING EXPENSE )
10986i HOERE GER.0 S. A MECHANICAL PARTS
= 109068 MOUSE OF BATTERIES � '{ 92.90 HATTeRI6 Y-r,- r <;
109E 69 'M OUBTON AND WILE ON: ;�.}}¢3dY LEGAL BHgVI OZ2URD CANA4146 ";� ,Mi
1 9670 Ire HICYCLESP L "'.•1 i T,
109871 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCNWINN CYCL $2,519.46
a 309872 ISCO. INC. $356.55 MECHANICAL PARTS )b
109873 IMPERIAL WEST CHERIA FERROUS/FERRIC CHLOR N.D.{-11-90.11-08-99 S
W 109874 INDUSTq BL TMR EAQE9 PRODUCTS '' '".a22¢.21 CO S - '
IQ9875 'INFI LCO DEGREMQNT T. INC., %"F¢0 .2T MECHANICAL PARTS )
109E : .t. ¢ JANITORIAL SUPPLIES c
109677 INSIDE E.P.A. WEEKLY REPORT $53.25 PUBLICATION
109878 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $30.84 WATER USE ')y
109879 J.L.A. CREDIT CORP. LEABE AGREEMENT - MICROFICHE MACHINE
21,
09860 JAY 13 C TERING / ." $470.50 ME$245HTIN XF8N8E
109881 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY$^,,. "[ #971.29'. ELECTRIC PARTS . �)
209682 HALL EE •9 CO PU SUP S PRINT SUPPLIER
109083 KAMAN BEARINGS L SUPPLY fP96.2T FITTINGS
109BBA KATZ. HOLLIS, CORER t ASSOC. $300.00 PUBLICATION (� j
1098845 KEENAN B ASSOCIATES 9 g WORKERS COMP ADMINISTRATIVE FEE
10988E THE KEITH COMP#HIES - {2075.00 ENGINEBRIN E C R..
109BB7 KELLY SERVICES ;; }; $610.75. TBMPOMARY 86AVZCBB
9B CURITY PACIFIC NAT-L BANK CONSTRUCTION 5-34-2 RETENTION RELEASE:
109889 KT XMEBLE BROS.. INC. $991.31 I MF
109890 KING BEARING. INC. $13.948.05 MECHANICAL PARTS
109891 YA%I / NLCEN-L IN JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
309B92 RN XAPSH. JONCS 6 DORAN $27.25 - - LE SERVICE - UNIVERSAL
109893 KNO% INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 8922.86 TOOLS )
I!
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/J3/90 PAGE . 1
REPORT NUMBER ,AP13 )
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 0 T N, DATE 10 30/90 ; )
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT- DESCRIPTION .
109894 VLADIMIR KOGAN f11.12 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 7
109095 MARTIN KORDICK. SR fl 306.0! CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 5-35-1
VARTO
10989E LEEOS f NORTHRUP 0772.00 MEETING EXPENSE
109897 HOWARD LEMBKE $62.19
109898 JOHN LISEE PUMPS. INC. $140.66 PUMP PARTS
109899 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 02 S1.100.07 COi7MUR-BLPTNAA
109900 DON LUCCHESI 5175.00 PERMIT REFUND
ID9901 MDT BIOLOGIC COMPANY f231. SERVICE AGREEMENT
109902 MPS -'rf36.1!00 'NCPrb71iLAI,AIc BERVICHU
109903 MACOMCO 0187.28.. SERVICE AGREEMENT )
109904 MARINE S VALVE SUPPLY $431.19 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
109905 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $31.19 IFIIVPRVN8A3'SVPPLI
109906 MATT - COLOR. INC. 51.967.92 CHLORINATION PARTS
109907 MAXYELL COLORS $7.87 PHOTO PROCESSING oft
INN MCKINLET EQUIPMENT CORP f399.31
109909 MICRO MOTION 0119.10 INSTRUMENT PARTS
109910 NICROAGE COMPUTER 51:117.09 COMPUTER HARDWARE
109911 MICROAGE COMPUTER STORES - $740.19 CORMS ".
Fri 109912 MIDLAND MFG. CORP. S79.85 CHLORINATION PARTS ):
X 109913 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. i ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
209914 JAME$ M. MONTGOMERY yf3�092.OS
W 109915 MOORE PRODUCTS CO. 1 - y FT39.51 - VALVE TARTS )3
109916 MOTTON SALT ANO/OR 1V AB96.S2 SALT
. IuV917 MOTION INDUSTRIES. INC. 892.00 WAR�-
Oa 10991E MpTOR OLA INC. f1.339.98 COMMUNICATIONB EQUIPMENT u )�
109919 MURP HT SAFETY SWITCH i 61.97 ELECTRIC PARTS
r 9 0 NATIONAL PLANT SE PVICE • NC• 'p3390.00 r
f3.a6]7 966.6G -33
NEYARN ELECTRONICS f195.12 INSTRUMENT SUPPSUET K. NEYOERG COryj . CDj109921 NLIES109922
109923 NORTHGATE COMPUTER SYSTEMS 9136.00 convu,an"Y7IRT'-`� `
109924 OFFICE PAVILION/INTERIOR RES. $1.030.41 OYPICB FUIINITUBS J-7-8 )'
109925 OR SYSTEMS CO. 157,529.82 CHLORINE M.O. 2-10-90
109926 ORANGE BEARING,IRC'.1 $160.25 �(
109927 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY 671.72 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES . )
10992E ORANGE COUNTY CHERICAL C0.' .f3.513.51 - CHEMICALS
IBM! ORANGE VALVE S FITTING CO. $1.043.73 TTTINGB
109930 OSCAR•S LOCK S SAFE f97.63 KEYS
109931 OVCR SPE AT EEMOVA ST TEM f OVBRSPRAY REMOVAL
1 99]2 OX YSEN SERVICE ' "` f9BB.79 PECI7dri uwNcso - 9
109933 COUNTY OF ORANGE `' f 7.02B.00 DATA PROCESSING PIE
109931 COUN IT SANITATION DISTRICT 16.650.17 R8D®URSB'WORRRRS COMP INSURANCE TURD l;
109345 FIF $2,204.15 SE Sl-VMO SERVICES
10993E PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $3.571.48 SAFETY SUPPLIES <)
109937 PACIFIC BELL $671.94 TELEPHONE SERVICES
309938 PA C WATER CONDITIONING CO. - 368.10 LAm SERVICES
109939 PACTEL CELLULAR. 069.28 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES :�
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 13/05/90 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43 )
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLA4MS PAID 10/13/90 PORTING DATE 10/10/95 )
VARIANT no. VENDOR AADUNT�l DESCRIPTION
109940 PAGENET $64.94 RENTAL EQUIPMENT • ,
109941 PANAMA JOE•S/RED ONION $736.03 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
109942 . LOP I7NSTRI:, p A40107.94 INBTRNIRNT PART
109943 INC SLGS REMVL M.0.5-11-68
0 A j .O PO .0.1-10-90.E-9-89PONAP6R0
1944 INC. )
109945 PORTER BOILER SERVICE, INC. $03.00 FITTINGS
119946 POKER SYSTEMS ST2.69 MBCRANICAL PARTS
109947 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE U1.00 ICE
10994E T PO JE ARE"
J} ^�!^
109999 PUMP EN67NCEP IN6 CO � 'e; i ;. {aT1.7$ PUMP PART t )
109950 RE6I5 RIR 0 E C .i _ RBGIBTRAT�ON �TMIN
109951 QUALITY HYDRAULICS $92.14 PUMP PARTS
109952 R•P•M. EIECTR i[ MOTORS f112.B1 GENERATOR REPAIR .)
0995] R. OU O INSTRUMENT REPAIR
109954 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. " 31rp50.61 TARS Brq REMOVAL
109955 ,R ECPUITMENT $PECIALI{7§ }N7�L�j'.i . }T90.00 " REGISTRATION, TAINING `
995 VALVE ': ,", R
10,95, PED KING SHOES $244.72 SAFETY SHOES QE
rn 10995E THE PE6'STER S929.67 NOTICED 6 ADS )ti X 109959 REMOTE ME Ep E E POSTAGE 99
�' 109960 7ME REP UBLTC $ p 7 p • 2 t32Sa 04 N f+i' V "'
109"1 MILTON RIVE
RA y7P 3-?1 �3R4Bp.B4 y M88TINQ 86PBN06 IMBPBC'j}ON P2-02-} )
109962 J ROBEA
T
S CONBTRUCTTON
-� 119963 J. R. ROBERTS • $49,549.75 CONSTRUCT -
n 309964 ROBIN50N FER7ILIIER CO. $6,193.75 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIESJ, 4-2
) .
109264 :OSEMOUNT IN TRANSMITTER
cn 109966 RUTAN S TUCKER ° 'qI - 1107B.9II 0 e .MIT
10996T JOSEPN T. RYERSON 4. SONI INL44 rf9L 10 BASIN RBPAZR$ '99 .. b, �: PUBLICATIO -. ��..109969 SAFETY-KLEIN CORP. tI M.80 PARTS CLEANER
309970SALES TECHNOLOGY i193.00 REGISTRATION, TRAINING1099 AN 0 N0 6 N[ CONSTRUCTION 3-33R
109972 SANTp.1NA ;R}7Ep FLOOD 1�100.0, HEMD$$BHIP BS, - -
109973 OOUS SARYI{ 30.$p RBc;BgpA.TxoN. TRAININGCONBTM CTIO P2-40P1-27-162109975 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT.L i191.465.26 OCEAN NONITORING M.O. - -
I09976SEARS. ROEBUCK S CO. t745.44 FREEZER99 S.F S AN INO MEETING BIP8N86, INSPECTION 10997E SHAMROCK SUPPLY1�S3b71TOOLS 109979 MICHAEL SILrER37E1N' 70298.93 MERTIMQ EXPENSE, TRAINING9 SOIL TESTING109981 SOFT VAREHOUSE/NESTERN REGIDN- f264.68 COMPUTER SOFTWARR109982 SOIL S PLANT LABOR4 TOPT t4S1.00 SOIL EVALUATION •,� y
099 ] 0 OA WATER USE a
119984 . SOUTHERN CAL}P, EDISON C0 ' - 11933.51 POWER
109985 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL. CO. }bt 901.I0 OIL G GREASE
1
M'
L -
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 15/63/90 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43 )
COUNTY SANILATION DISTlICTS OF SPA fig-COUNTY
CEAIMS PAID ID/13/9D POSTING DATE 10/10/94
i )
WARRANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT DVSCRIPjIDN
109906 STAMEN 2. SP.ASSOFF. P.E. $720.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-30-2 )
109987 YESTALLOY INC. $1,26e.65 WELDING SUPPLIES
Id498STAR T60L A SUPPLY CO. t2F065.65 TKOIS •�
109989 MANFRED STOPPER - $260.29 MEETING EXPENSE, INSPECTION PI-33
109990 STRATEGIC MATERIALS CORP. 9966.00 PUMP FART
_161F991 -----VUNMIT STEEL _ $150.77 STBE17-
109992 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL. INC. 56.995.69 TOOLS )
109993 T t C INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS. INC $538.01 ELECTRIC PARTS—Z39f� 7 L DYNE ANALYTICAL $256.63 --—INBTRUHEN'7_ _
109995 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD f3.729.70 TRUCK PARTS
109996 THERMO ENVTL INST. INC. _ f719.S1 INSTRUMENT REPAIR
99 0- NOON t SAFE SERVICE CC ti62.2/ KkV�
109999 TOTAL TECHNICAL SERVICES S237.75 WELDING INSPECTION SERVICES
109999 TRAVEL TRAVEL _ _ H.472.00 TRAVEL SERVICES M.O.6-13-90
II0Of UCK L AUTO SUPPLY. INC. 41.228.29
I10001 TRUCKWARE i2.351.30 TRUCK PARTS
I10002 J.G. TUCKER t SON. INC. _ R)7T./6 INSTRUMENT PRATE
-�O pS7 UNOCAL tiS9.61 U.N.E.0ASOLINK- of
f7l 110009 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 5109.35 PARCEL SERVICES ){
110005 VYR SCIENTIFIC 92 395.63 LAID SUPPLIES
2 atuoub VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. S.S31.BB PLlIRB2NG-BUFF
110007 ROSEMOUNT/VAREC DIVISION 1.}lB.75 MECHANICAL PARTS
11000B VARIAN INSTRUMENT GROUP 2 0/.37 LAD SUPPLIES -
.....{ 110009 VERTEX SYSTEMS - $1.040.00 �COMPUTER-DATA NAMHNANCT�'----SSTO0 S
110010 VICE METRONICS $276.47 INSTRUMENT PART P );
3. 110011 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 57.4 99 SAFETY SUPPLIES
• ARL ANV O TUT,
NS.l9 AG- ATlINBURRBMeAT
110013 RICHARD Y. VON LANGEN Sl}5.15 MEETING EXPENSE L"'! �A
11001/ LARRT WALKER ASSOCIATES INC. ij50.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Y OIu KEN.'bUPNA t LA ONT. INC. J $105.98 UOBYEATITi1T u
118016 VEST COAST TERMINALS. INC. 13,011.11 OFFICE MACHINE )
I10017 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY 19.105.09 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-8-90
6517.0/ XMi7IA881(IRi>� EBROICBE-7=2 -
110019 XEROX CORP. 3,123.76 COPIER LEASES ' )
110020 BEGRIME YARDLEY COKPANY $399.69 VALVES
1 _
OU2 J HNS N YOKOGAVA CORF 5217.9/ INSTRUMENT PART —�!cyr
1011728 21EEA8TH AND RLPER _ 3 001173'73 CONSTRUCTION J-19- T-,'A•)
109728 HRIND6PSON CORP, t40-,------ CONeTRUCTION J-19-2
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 20/10/90 c$6,895_770.122�
x ,
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 09/20/90 PAGE 7
REPORT NINSER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 20/10/90 POSTING DATE 10/10/90
SUMMARY AMOUNT
pl OPER FUND j06&.65 _p
01 CONST FUND 1782.39
42 OPER FUND $16,779.28 N
92 CAP FAC FUND $1,432.82
p2 COURT FOND 3296.76
p3 OPER FUND $680,336.64
p3 CONST FUND 3463.78
p5 OPER FUND $3,398.27
05 CAP FAC FUND $703,789.50 /
p6 OPER FUND $320.98
Y7 OPER FUND $2,490.86
m 17 CAP FAC FUND $475.00
X #11 OPER FUND $6,928.62
Z p13 OPER FUND j86.35
p14 OPER FUND $24.77
024 CAP FAC FUND $1,746.88
p5&6 OPEN FUND $16.06
p6&7 OPER FUND 2479.85
n p7&14 OPER FUND $24.18
JT OPER FUND $685,624.78
V CORP $6,550,169.68 .�
SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FUND $21,063.65
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $209,668.37
-------------
$6,895,770 12
Q
FUND NO 914. - JT DIST UOPKING CAPITAL PiOCESSING DATE 1./17/90 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT& Of CIRANSE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 18/24190 POSTING DATE 10/24/90 ;
WARRANT NO, VENDOR Aq3uNT DESCRIPTION
110041 AT A 7 $273.59 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICE
110041 ADAMSON UNIFORM 9 EQUIP $127.34 SAFETY SUPPLIES
110043 ADVANCE INDUSTRIAL $36.87 ELECTRIC PARTS
11RC44 AIRWAY SCALE COMPANY $575.62 8CALE MAINTENANCH
IIDn45 LEASING A AUTO REPAIRS
IICO46 ALPMAGA2 $654.02 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIED
11OL47 ALTA SALES INC $376.21 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES ; c)
110648 AMEN SOCIETY OF CIVIL INGO $90.00 ADVERTISING
110049 ROBCO INC 4/OR AMERICAN BE 510.954.33 HARDWARE
110050 AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY 521055.11 POLAROID FILM
COPIER ABASE .:
110052 ANAMEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION 52.972.0E HEWER REPAIRS DIET 7
110053 APCO VALVE L PRIMER CDRP $355.60 VALVE PARTS. )
SYSTEMS1 45 ' NOTICES 6 ADS
110055 ARI20NA INSTRUMENT 91,925.44 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS Q)'
116056 ARK TECHNOLOGIES 600.00 CONSULTING b USER PEE PROGRAM
"L.MX FALCON DISPQSAl SERVICE GRIT REMOVAL N.O. 7-13-88
LILD58 BABSON L SHEPPARD 52.915.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES - OIL WELLS
11D059 BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE 9445.08 RACKPLOW TESTING �S
IlakkiBACKSTREET GALLERY $23227.fi5 DISPLAYS f
110061 BANK OF AMERICA 9B•00 - ]BASS CARDS. ..
bO 110062 PH BAROTTI AND ASSOC $517712.50 CONSTRUCTION BERVIC98 PI-34-F,P2-32 )
LAB SUPPLIER $
a-, 1116064 B BATEMAN 9595.00 DEFERRED COHP DISTRIBUTION
l'IJ 11OC65 BARTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $5.194.91 LAB SUPPLIES )j
BAYLESS STATIONERS STIT.D9 OFFICE SUPPLIES IS
110067 ROBERT BEIN WILLIAM FROST sitpol.98 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-34
11006E BESTWAY TRANSPORTATION J157.94 FREIGHT ' )
DEFERRED COHP DISTRIBUTION
110370 BORLAND INTERNATIONAL $1.033.36 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
110071 BRINDERSON CORP 5594.317.7E CONSTRUCTION J-19-2 7�
LAS SERVICES
110073 BROWN 4 CALDWELL CONSULTING 63 22.78 ENGINEERING SSRVICER P2-23- ,P2-35- ,414r
110074 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE 59.23 PUBLICATION, . J
a nR79 USIL__AB0__&ESOClAYFS INC AN 0.00 SURVEYING SERVICED US 68-71
IIU076 GARY 6 STREED $574.18 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
110077 CAL-CHEM SALES $966.41 HARDWARE
INSTRUMENT PART
110079 CALIFORNIA FILTRATION iF41.06 MECRIUICAL PARTS
118080 CALLAWAY CHEMICAL CO 539.;14.12 POLYMER M.0, 8-8-90 :7
TRAINING
110682 CAPITAL WESTWARD 52.4B8.23 GAUGE
IIUD83 JOHN CAROLLD ENGINEERS $325.557.10 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-36,P2-42,P1-34 J
..ni.oe [ruin eaxM �x lC AT'DNS SYSTEM 14,617,%R TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
110685 CENTURY SAFETY INST 6 SUPP {i92.42 SAFETY SUPPLIS
110086 CERTIFIED APPLIANCE COINC f42.00 LAB REPAIRS - ')
FUND NO 9159 - JT ]IST VOPKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10 17/90 P45E 2
REPORT NUMBER AP45 )
CLAIMS PAID 10/24/9D POSTING DATE 10124/90
WARRANT Ne, Vf
110087 AN CHESTERTON - LA 51.62 MECHANICAL PALATE )
11nr.RR COACT FIRF F FIRE 8 UIPMENT MAINTENANCE .
110889 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA 1{T 927.9 PUMP PARTS
110090 COMPUTER SAY - ;.609.4� OFFICE SUPPLIES )
WORKS HARD REPAIR
110092 CONNELL GM PARTS / DIV $34.35 TRUCK PARTS
110093 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $4.494.07 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES a ,)
NAUDWARE
110095 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS $1?399j9 BLUEPRINTING _
116096 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C IT I062.11 SOIL TESTING : )
MECHANICAL RNPALIRS
110698 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $552.39 TRUCK PARTS
110099 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC S3.83 BLBCTRIC PARTS : )
MILEAGE EXPENSE
110161 CRANE VEYOR CORP SSS1.Yl PAINT SUPPLIES
110102 LARRY CURTI TRUCK A EQUIPM f2?9660.00 ILLIOI REMOVAL M.0.7-11-90 )
n ESE ueE
I101n4 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 560.45 RAZAADDUS WASTE TAX
IT1 1IJ105 CALIF STATE WATER RESOURCES SS.a29.00 REPLIED, GRANT OVBRPAYNCEW )F
AWARDS CLB - P �c�c
110107 DAILY PILOT 340.5E ADVERTISING
pU 110108 DA7APRO RESEARCH CORP E356.00 - SUBSCRIPTION. TSCN JOURHBL )
C CO L SIGNS
-i Iloilo DE ARTA CORPORATION $150.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
I10111 DE GUELLE 6 SONS GLASS CO 2534.99 BUILDING REPAIRSt" OISrA PRINT COMPANY )v
OFFICE FURNITURE - FILING SY9TEM
N 110113 DORADO ENTERPRISES INL - i1 a0999.49 PLANT REPAIRS 8 MAINTENANCE
116114 JOSEPH S DUOOR PE )y720.00 NNGINEERING SERVICES )
..q nuuu nu ARn, Fe.P tlme-.. PAINT 811 I
I1e116 ENSECO-CAL SI.200.00 OCEAN SAMPLING
110117 EASTMAN INC $1.416.37 OFFICE SUPPLIES )}
RENTAL EQUIPMENT
110119 ENCHANTER INC $23200.00 'OCEAN MONITORING N.D. 3-14-90
110120 MARSMALL FAIRRES 7178.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION )
JOHN R LA.rrNS iclu or 2 CONSTRUCTIONNSERUED S N.C. 1 -13-99-
110122 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP f615.OB AIR FREIGHT
116123 FISCHER L PORTER CO 94.552.35 CHLORINATION PARTS e
LAB SUPPLIES
110125 FLAT L VERTICAL CONCRETE - 123.00 CONCRETE CUTTING
110126 FLO-SYSTEMS 0505.18 PIPE
F.uZR uA Nm IY PUMP PARTS
12 L128 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $77.53 FILM
116129 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $2.934.78 PAINT SUPPLIES
1111`n Fn, IYTr RPRI eeC ySAFETY CONSULTANT
110131 ARGENE FRET ;105.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
110132 CITY OF FULLERTON 6110.13 WATER USE - )
0
° � i
FUND NO 9199 JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE IP/17/9G PAGE 3 I
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION UNTY
CLAIMS PAID 10/24/90 POSTING DATE ID/24/9Q
WARRANT NO. VENDOR A40UNT DESCIIPTION
110133 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO $6,243.62 TELEPHONE SERVICES 7
210134 GEORGE LEECH L ASSOCIATES IS2.76 FITTINGS
118135 6IERLICM-MITCHELL INC 5.097.79 MECHANICAL-PARTS
110136 GORDONAS INC ti175.7� OFFICE SUPPLIEO )
IldlaT GREAT WESTERN RECLANAT10N STREET SN6EPING SERVICES
110130 DON GREEN 6 ASSOCIATES 110.696.25 SURVEYING SERVICES US 88-72
110139 GRINNELL CORPORATION 11d17.28 VALVE
H DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
118141 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTI �9376.}1 HARDWARE
110142 HARRIS AOACOM :1299.63 COMPRESSOR REPAIR )
ENGINE PARTS'
1101414 HAULAW6Y CONTAINERS $1.594.00 CONTAINER RENTAL
110145 HILTI INC $847.51 HARDWARE ' )
116141 HOERBIGER C 69 MECHANICAL PARTS
110147 DONALD 0 HONOMICHL -FS300.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
110148 HOUSE OF BATTERIES BATTERIES
TRAVEL EXPENSES j
110150 AS HUGHES CO INC •3971.06 HARDWARE
R1 130151 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $17.42 WATER USE )�
X lialaz HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER S A $99 RUBBER STAMPS
11 B151 IEEE SER YItE CENTER - C87 - 36.N9 PUBLICATION `
dU 1I015A IND INDB3TRIES 233.53T ELECTRIC SUPPLIED )1
118155 • A - FERRIC CHLORIDE H.O.11-8-89 S
-i 118156 INDUSTRIAL RESOURCES $250.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
....57 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS a1.201.69 CONNECTORS )I
PAPER11115ATNGqAM JANITORIAL SUPPLIER
W 11815, INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. - 183.65. TRUCK PARTS
118160 INTERNATIONAL INS INC AS0.15 HARDWARE )
LAB SUPPLIES
110362 JLA CREDIT CORP 31/5.32 MICROFICHE LEASE
110163 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP 31.A13.A4 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
—1 MEETING EXPENSES
110165 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 1 526.55 - ELECTRIC PARTS
110166 MAHAN BEARINGS 8 SUPPLY 691.28 FITTING$ �` 1 3
11,167 KANEN rGHPANY TOOL' .
110160 BELLY SERVICES $130.69 TEMPORARY SERVICES
115169 XENYO INC $243.764.98 CONSTIRIMION 5-30-2
lint,. N NACMING SUPPLIES
116171 KROHNE AMERICA INC a 931.A0 INSTRUMENT PART
110172 L 6 C TIRE SERVICE 1T6.A0 TRUCE PARTS J
Y1.71, OFF . An L.NRWIT,NR FNP. a ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-33
118174 LEEDS 1 NORTHRUP 11.865.75 INSTRUMENT PARTS
110175 LEVIS PUBLISHERS INC $95.00 PUBLICATION �
CONSULTING
PARTS
Balls KP LIN OSTROM INC -'j716.00 CONSULTING - EIR COMPLIANCE
I IB178 LORAIN PRODUCTS #116.22 INSTRUMENT PART / 1
Y �c'L
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12/I7190 PACE A
REPORT NUMBER APA3
CLAIMS PAID 10/24/90 POSTING DATE 1612,190 )
110179 AJ LYNCH CO $1.432.90 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES . ')
PNOM14PNXC 0SRVICXG
110181 MARVAC ELECTRONICS ;i iF'{76.Dy INBTRUHNNT SUPPLIES
110182 MATT - CNLOR INC 6,64 .'i� CHLORINATION PARTS.
ttaua RerWFPHOTO PROCEARXIGG,
11118E MCKENNA EMIR L EQUIP f10.151.75 PUMP PARTS
116185 MCHASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO $60.07 BUILDING NRTERIALS
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
116187 MERCK L CO INC '. 635.Q0 PUBLICATION
11318E METER CRAFT INC R38�.72 '< ELECTRIC REPAIRS )
n et Ra mitgn KnTinu no INSTRUMENT
11419D MILLAR ELEVATOR SERVICE S412.56 SERVICE AGREEMENT
I1-1191 MILLTRONICS $2,155.25 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES )
6
11193 MOT ERA LABORATORIES { .756.50 I SERVICES
116194 MORTON ON SALT AND/Op $3.22 - SALTFITTINGS
)
I1G196 MOTOROLA INC 973.00 RADIO REPAIRS
FTI 110197 MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICES - 3e3.92 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES )
X J IN TINGBUP I s
1I1O99 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM 556.10
110200 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH {{.00 WATBE
NM$
110202 OFFICIAL AIRLINE GUIDES 9363.60 PUBLICATION
110205 OR SYSTEMS CO $31.724.57 CHLORINE N.O. 2-11-90
ROMP
BYP NB
D 110205 ORANGE BEARING INC 945.27 10CNANI P PARTS
110206 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPL { 059.55 SLECTRIC BUPPLI88
PRXNTING
110208 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO $1,325.78 CHEMICALS
IIJ209 ORANGE VALVE A FITTING CO. $506.05 ,FITTINGS
SETS
110211 DANGER SERVICE 327.29 SPECIALTY 0A868
110212 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT t. •029.56 REIMBURBS WORKERS CORP BPI
tnP1T .."A— cAPPrr T, GAYETY SUPPLIER ' t
IlU219 PACIFIC BELL f28.98 TELSPHONS SERVICES
IIu215 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING C f60.40 RENTAL EQUIPMENT ')
"c", PA
110217 PATTER CORP/ TAILOR INSTp R76.6S INBTRUIBNT PART
I10218 PEARSONS LAWNMOWER CENTER221.B9 TOOL RBPAIp J)
". PC -
210220 ROY PENOERGRAFT 9945.00 DBFBRRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
I1J221 PHOTO S SOUND CO 4749.69 COMPUTER PART
110223 PITNEY BOWES Ii S.5
1 POSTAGE METER RENTAL _
110224 PLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE 1325.17 HARDWARE .�
O
FUND ND 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CLPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1:111120 PARE 5
REPORT NUNBEN APA3 )
COUNTY a
CLAIMS PAID 10/24/90 POSTING DATE 14/24/90 ; )
DESCRIPTIONWARRANT NO, VENDOR
110225 POLYPURE INC $20.656.54 POLYMERS N.0.1-30-90,E-8-8
PORTER BOILER SERVICE BUILDING MATERIAL
118227 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO ".4102.31 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
110228 POWER SYSTEMS .1'.$187.56. _ ELECTRIC "PA3RS •� )
ICE
110930 PRINCETON TYPESETTING • S29.53 PRINTING
110231 PROFESSIONAL PUBLICATIONS IN 15.99 FREIGHT : �)
110232 THE PROJECTS SOLUTION CO INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O.8-10-98
01 110233 PULSAFEEDER 97.119 POMP PARTS
116234 PUMP ENGINEERING CO S4.934.4? PUNIF PARTS 1
COMPRESSOR PARTS
110236 REGISTRAR PRYOR RESOURCES ' 809.00 TRAINING
110237 QUALITY HYDRAULICS 91,925.55 PUMP PARTS )
lla23A RAF &qqaCTATFtENGINEERING SERVICES �y
116239 RECYC INC S0J$513.79 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.O. 5-11-BB �}I
IIE240 RED WING SHOES ,,FS7I5.92 SAFETY SHOOS )
ELECTRIC REPAIRS
310242 REMEDY TEMP 58.311.93 T6MPORAKY SERVICES
M lIC243 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY IS $1,114.05 FITTINGS )
X lia244 ROCCOOSG TRUCK REPAIRS
110245 RODNEY-HUNT CO 627.9R MACHINE PARTS
�. 110246 ROSEMOUNT/UNILOC l9S.SS INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES )
1102 WN LEGAL SERVICES - BEATRICE iT NESSON
l 1
u248 RYCOM INSTRUMENTS INC $137.27 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS
...249 SANCON ENGINEERING INC 116.155.00 PAINT SUPPLIES )
IlA2ZISANTA A PRINTING
l/l 110251 MR. S MRS. ALBERT S. SCHILLING s TDD 0.00 EASEMENT M.O. 10-10-90 "rf
110252 THE SCHOOLER CO i 000.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES )
n O29 OFFICE MACHINES
110254 SEA SYS INC $5,4.17.00 OCEAN MONITORING
110255 CITY OF SEAL BEACH $159.50 WATER USE )'
_ APPLIANCES
11u257 SHAMROCK SUPPLY 875.41 TOOLS
110258 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLI i35.00 PHYSICAL EXAMS - e
113 - BOIL TESTING N.O. 6-19-59
Ilu260 SMITH PIPE A SUPPLY INC $103.52 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
110261 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP S205.96 TOOLS
11c211 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
110263 SOFTWARE PUBLISHINS CORP 69S.19 COMPUTER SOPI'MME
110264 SOLAR TURBINES INCORPORATED f3l S.42 TURBINE PANT
n n06M _BDIIIWCDAS7 AIR 0 tTv ir. PERMIT PRO
114266 SOUTH COAST DODGE $11.99 TRUCK PARTS
110267 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO A44D.196.34 POWER .�
11[268 SO fAL NATURAL GAB
110269 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO S19i989.32 DIESEL FUEL
116276 SOUTHWEST MATERIAL HANDLING i338.67 TRUCK PARTS .)
1 I
a A
FUND NO 9154 _ JT DIST WOMKING CAPITAL PROCESS]%& DATE IT I17/91 PAGE 6
R:POH7 NUM3ER AP45 )
CLAIMS PAID 10/24/9D POSTING DATE`10/21/90
wrun�o A.
119271 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $I.4L1.35 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTAL )
WELDING I
110273 STAR TOOL 6 SUPPLY CO $076 06 TOOLS '
119274 STERLING ART s'�i249.6} ART SUPPLIES - • )
118275 c CONIPACT LRNP4CAPINGM.0,0-9-09
lIC276 SUNSET FORD $109.48 .TRUCK PARTS
110277 SUPER CHEM CORP $1.064.99 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
11627A CONTINENT.1 AIR T... IN, TOOLE
110279 TAYLOR-DUN" MFG COMPANY TRUCK PARTS
110280 THEO-TELLO-AUSCM INC i¢.27iT 71 CRANE INSPECTION )
LAB SUPPLIES
110202 TRAVEL TRAVEL $1.297.50 TRAVEL SERVICES
11&263 TRUCK $ AUTO SUPPLY INC $591.50 TRUCK PARTS �)
TOOL BOX
1102B5 UNDE06ROUNO SERVICE ALERT TyTS1B0.60 ANIMAL SERVICE FOR
110286 THE UNISOURCE CORP T$642.94 ORIFICE SUPPLIES )
.y noa7 ...TFn nAAP tPARCEL SERVICNIG
I1G268 DATAVAULT USSAFE DEPOSIT CO $9,280.00 COMPUTER BACK-UP STORAGE
I77 1u289 VWR SCIENTIFIC $1,197.53 LAB SUPPLIES
0 UP PLIES
191 ROSENOYYT/YAREC DIVISION NC AL SUPPLING )III 17U , 111212 VARIAN INSTRUMENT GROUP - E 956.30 LAB SUPPLIES )T
PATA SUPPORT
110294 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY S515.62 SAFETY SUPPLIES
IA 11D295 VILLAGE NURSERIES $30.50 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES )i
WATER SOFTENER
m 110297 CARL WARREN $ CO 300.00 IMMIANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR
110298 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL 390.00 REGISTRATION - )
urqTrmmmrATFO
117300 ROURKE A WOODRUFF $59.817.80 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.6-4-89
119301 XEROX CORP &2.517.49 COPIER LEASES )�
P VALVE PARTS
lIB303 - EVERETT H YORK CO ' s6B 1.09 ENGINE PARTS
11030E RICHARD B EDGAR �$200.D0 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION )
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 10/24/90 $2,572.907.85
FUND NO 9199 - !T DIST HORNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/17/90 PAGE 7
_ __ REPORT NRYRFR AP49
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 10/24/90 POSTING DATE 10/24/90
r
—8lI1MARY —e�^�
RI OPER FUND $211.58 u
—4L-CAP-FAC FUN➢ 15G200
42 OVER FUND $8,865.01 ;; •�
42 CAP FAC FUND 48,781.22
—_f3. OVER FUND- _. _—_ —_ _- .—____-.__ilfl,t45,E9_
93 CAP FAC FUND $2,432.63
95 OPER FUND - $4,597.39 )
Af-CAY-FAf— _ 1259.
f6 OVER FUND $129.30
06 CAP FAC FUND $468.00
—f1.OPER-PURO.
97 CAP PAC FUND $2,009.53
411 OVER FUND $7,954.66
2111-00
413 OVER FUND $8.00 ,
R1 413 CAP PAC FUND $13.00
>.y14-02ER_EUND .1,.90
U14 CAP FAC FUND $1,772.51
to U566 OPBR FUND $2,136.47 '7
�.—f566-CEP men n,un —__ 618E 26I
47614 OPER FUND $5,140.88
JT OPER FUND $1,108,083.95
to MI.
V SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FORD $6,943.36 =' )
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FOND $134,683.06
907.85
uvvevv......
I :�
/ EXCERPT FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR
JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIREC70RS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S. 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held at the
hour of 7:30 p.m. , November 14, 1990, at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley,
California.
The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order
at 7:30 p.m.
The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present.
! t t t t 3 t ,t • t • t R R • R
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
rov n a a Movement
Pro ram, - 2 er es A That the following resolutions for
Cert f cotes of Participation Capital Improvement Program, 1990-92
Series A Certificates of Participation,
pursuant to the Boards' adopted long-range financial plan, be and are hereby,
approved:
DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. COP MAXIMUM AMOUNT
1 90-162-1 $ 99260,000
2 90-163-2 26,250,000
3 90-164-3 28,370,000
5 90-165-5 8,480,000
6 90-166-6 6,9209000
7 90-167-7 99810,000
11 90-168-11 8,570,000
13 90-169-13 340,000
14 90-170-14 2,000,000
Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I. PENNY KYLE, Deputy Board Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 39 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,
California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be a full , true and
correct copy of minute entries of the meeting of said Boards of Directors on the
14th day of November, 1990.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 14th day of November,
1990.
Deputy Board cu t of the Boards
of Director Cou y Sanitation
Districts N 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11,
13 and 14
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2,
I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting
on '� ,,y.Qv.AaL� i 4 , 199 O was duly posted for public ,inspection
at the main lobby of the Districts ' offices on y1.�a.«xwn g
19Qo .
IN WITNESS WHE�REOF, I have hereunto set my hand this
day of 1990
Rita, Secretary of
each of the Boards of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts
Nos . 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 , 11 , 13 6
14 of Orange County, California
vim'