Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-10-10 +6'M\ThTIOh / 0 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA R.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 oeh,N 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 "�mecW� (714)962-2411 October 3, 1990 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 10, 1990 - 7:30 P.M. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6 , 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. �rryetary -- Tentatively-Scheduled Tentatively-Scheduled UpcomingMeetingss: FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - Wednesday, October 17th, at 5: 30 p.m. JOINT WORKS SELECTION - Wednesday, October 24th, at 4 : 30 p.m. COMMITTEE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday, October 24th, at 5 : 30 p.m. CONSERVATION, - Thursday, October 25th, at 5: 30 p.m. RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE BUILDING COMMITTEE - Tuesday, October 30th, at 5 : 30 p.m. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Af ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1�0L115 AVEME _ 00 50%B1D Fg1 VG LE .ML IA 927 ntm 952.2n1 - JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings October Oct 10, 1990 Oct 24, 1990 November Nov 14, 1990 None Scheduled December Dec 12, 1990 None Scheduled January Jan 09, 1991 Jan 23, 1991 February Feb 13, 1991 Feb 27, 1991 March Mar 13, 1991 Mar 27, 1991 April Apr 10, 1991 Apr 24, 1991 May May 08, 1991 May 29, 1991 June Jun 12, 1991 Jun 26, 1991 July Jul 10, 1991 Jul 24, 1991 August Aug 14, 1991 None Scheduled September Sep 11, 1991 Sep 25, 1991 October Oct 09, 1991 Oct 23, 1991 BGIARDS Of DIRECTORS County Sanllatlon Districts P.O. Box 8127. 10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County, California Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 JOINT BOARDS AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 10, 1990 - 7: 30 P .M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954. 2, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call ( 3 ) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) (5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. ( 6) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors . (a) Report of Joint Chairman (b) Report of General Manager (c) Report of General Counsel 10/10/90 ' (7) EACH DISTRICT ACTION: if no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman: District 1 - September 12, 1990 regular District 2 - September 12, 1990 regular District 3 - September 12, 1990 regular District 5 - September 12, 1990 regular District 6 - September 12, 1990 regular District 7 - September 12, 1990 regular District 11 - September 12, 1990 regular District 13 - September 12, 1990 regular. District 14 - September 12, 1990 regular (8 ) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District. ) See pages "A" and "B" 9/12/90 9/26/90 ALL DISTRICTS Joinoperating Fund - $ 591,412•.70 $1;209, 348. 62 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 279,608.30 521,753. 37 Joint Working Capital Fund - 128,898.79 228,322.97 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 100,224.16 20,230.52 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 2,891 .06 970 .53- DISTRICT NO. 2 - 10,593 .50 481,683.16 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 13,705 . 35 29,449.66 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 41, 354. 39 19,056. 60 DISTRICT NO. 6 - -0- 784 .75 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 13 ,839 . 30 41,065 . 66 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 746 .83 11,048 . 64 I DISTRICT NO. 13 - -0- 123.12 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 892.37 3 ,384 .80 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 8 6 JOINT - 20.27 18,388 .62 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 6 7 JOINT - 3, 359 .07 -0- DISTRICTS NOS. 7 6 14 JOINT - 9 .03 4,543 .65 11,187 ,555 .12 $2,590,154.67 -2- . � (9 ) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 9(a) THROUGH 9(t) 10/10/90 1 matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by `...� a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. The Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase order contract for Purchase of Microcomputer Hardware, Software and Associated Peripherals, ' Specification No. E-191, for 23 systems, for a total amount not to exceed $82,515.35 plus sales tax, as follows: See page "C" Category Vendor Amount Hardware Action Software $ 5,241.00 Software CoastTech Computer 2,923 .00 Hdwr/Sftwr Computer Bay 7,823 .00 Hdwr/Sftwr Inacomp Computer Centers 8,694.00 Hdwr/Sftwr Kalleen's Computer Supply 9,440.00 Hdwr/Sftwr LB & Associated 5,898 . 35 Hdwr/Sftwr Microage (Fountain Valley) 41,476 .00 Hdwr/Sftwr Microage (Santa Ana) 5 420.00 8 515. 35 (b) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase order contract for Blueprinting, Photocopying and Related Services, Specification No. 5-046 (Revised) , to Banana Blueprint, Inc. `..i for a one-year period beginning October 15, 1990, for a gross annual amount not to exceed $118,060.56 plus sales tax, with provision for four one-year extensions. See page "D" -3- 10/10 90 (9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (c) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue Change Order No. 2 to Purchase Order No. 34691 issued to Office Pavilion/Interior Resources for Purchase and Installation of Administration Building Interior Office Partitioning Systems and Furnishings, Job No. J-7-5, increasing the total authorized amount from $966,855.53 plus sales tax to an amount not to exceed $1,005,427.60 plus sales tax, for added storage and transport costs re interior office partitioning systems and furnishings pending completion of new Districts' facilities. (d) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-19-2, authorizing an addition of $30,183.44 to the contract with Brinderson Corporation for five items of additional work. See page "E" (a) Consideration of the following actions relative to Installation of Replacement Influent Meters, Job No. J-24: (1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing a net addition of $3,503.44 to the contract with P. R. Burke Industrial Corporation for four items of additional work or deletions, and granting a time extension of 20 calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page "F" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-137, accepting said project as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. See page "G^ - (f) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications for Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33, authorizing an addition of $23,000.00 to the contract with Gust R. Newberg Construction Company for one item of additional work. See page H. (g) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specification for Gas Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-1, authorizing a net addition of $9 ,644.00 to the contract with Ziebarth 6 Alper for three items of additional work or deletions. See page I. -4- 10/10/90 s (9 ) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (h) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-2, authorizing an addition of $32,309.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. for one item of additional work. See page "J" (i) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design and construction services, preparation of operations and maintenance manuals, and training services re Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1 , Job No. P1-36, and Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42, to provide for additional design services necessary to replace and realign existing 78-inch ocean outfall and modify existing scum collection system. (] ) Consideration of the following actions relative to the Professional Services Agreement with J. T. Horvath s Associates for specialized construction management and inspection services re various master-planned construction projects: (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for said services. See page "x" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-139 , approving said agreement with J. T. Horvath 6 Associates for said services, on an as-needed basis, for a two-year period beginning October 11 , 1990, at the following hourly rates, plus direct expenses at cost: See page "L" Agreement Period Hourly Rate 10/11/90 - 10/10/91 $ 35 .00 10/11/91 - 10/10/92 37 . 50 (k) Consideration of the following actions relative to the Professional Services Agreement with R. P. Lindstrom, Inc. for environmental consulting services to assist staff on NPDES Permit activities; regulatory and legislative liaison activities; and for technical support for sludge management, air quality, reclamation and conservation issues and in connection with CEQA compliance for Master Plan projects: (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for said services. See page "M" (ITEM (9 ) (k) CONTINUED ON PAGE 6] -5- 10/10/9-0 (9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (k) (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-140, approving said agreement with K. P. Lindstrom, Inc. for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor including overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $164,500.00. See page N. (1) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate a Professional Services Agreement with Ecosystems Engineering a Analyses for ecological consulting and statistical data analyses services. (m) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-141, approving and authorizing execution of a Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison Company for right-of-way required to. operate and maintain Southern California Edison's equipment which will provide electrical power to the new Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17, now under construction and the new Control Center/Operations and Maintenance Building, Job No. J-23-1, now under design. See page ^0^ (n) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-142, approving and authorizing execution of an agreement with the City of Newport Beach granting an easement to the City required in connection with construction of and access to a 30-inch City water line through Treatment Plant No. 2 from the Santa Ana River property line to Brookhurst Street, in exchange for a Quitclaim Deed from the City to the Districts, quitclaiming the City-s interest in a previous water line easement which also crosses Plant No. 2. See page "P^ DISTRICT 2 (a) Consideration of the following actions relative to the Professional Services Agreement with Nilldan Associates for preparation of a Project Report for Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-Rl: (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for said services. See page Q. (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-146-2, approving Professional Services Agreement with willdan Associates for preparation of a Project Report for Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1, - on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus , 1 overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $35 ,080.00. See page ^R^ -6- 10/10/90 (9) DISTRICT 3 - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (p) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Manholes on Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-33R, authorizing a net addition of $21,067.00 to the contract with Sancon Engineering, Inc. for three items of additional work or deletions. See page S. DISTRICTS 5 H 6 (q) Consideration of the following actions relative to Application for Leave to File Late Claim dated September 10, 1990 submitted by Comcast Cablevision for alleged damages in connection With Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Force Main and Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 5-29 : (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file General Counsel's Memorandum dated September 18, 1990, recommending denial of said Application for Leave to File Late Claim. See page "T" (2) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny said Application for Leave to File Late Claim. DISTRICTS 6, 7 6 14 (r) Consideration of the following actions relative to Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road, Contract No. 14-1-1B: (1 ) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for said project authorizing an addition of $90,319.00 to the contract with Steve Bubalo Construction Co. for four items of additional work, and granting a time extension of 13 calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page 'lull (2) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for said project authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities resulting in a net deduction of $28,641 .00 from the contract with Steve Bubalo Construction Co. See page .V. ( 3) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-147, accepting said project as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout �i Agreement. See page W. -7- 10/10/90 ( 9 ) DISTRICT 7 - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (s) Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Annexation No. 125 - Tract No. 9608 to County Sanitation District No. 7: (1) Consideration of motion rescinding the Board's action on May 13, 1987 authorizing the General Manager to enter into an agreement between the property owner/developer, County Sanitation District No. 7, the Orange County Harbors, Beaches and Parks District, and the City of Orange, setting forth the terms and conditions of proposed Annexation No. 125 (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-149-7 , approving Sewer Service Agreement with Crawford Hills Associates providing for deferred payment of annexation acreage fees for a portion of the territory contained in proposed Annexation No. 125. See page "X" ( 3) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-150-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex 182 acres of territory to the District located in the vicinity of Chapman Avenue and Crawford Canyon Road in the City of Orange, proposed Annexation No. 125 - Tract No. 9608 to County Sanitation District No. 7, and rescinding Resolution No. 87-39-7 See page "Y" (t) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-151-7 , accepting Grant of Easement from Mr. & Mrs. 'Albert B. Schilling for right-of-way required in connection with Abandonment of Nine District No. 7 Pump Stations, Contract No. 7-14; and authorizing payment in the amount of $1 ,000.00 for said right-of-way. See page "2" END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any -8- 10/10/90 (11) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of the following actions relative to the Professional Services Agreement with Dames 6 Moore to conduct Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-3, and Seismic Study `..� Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-2: (a) Verbal staff report (b) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for said services. See page — AA-(c) Consideration of Resolution No. 90--138, approving said agreement with Dames H Moore for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $460,000.00. See page "BB" (12) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Report of the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee' s written report of the meeting on September 27, 1990 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) (b) Consideration of action on the following items recommended by the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee: (1 ) Consideration of motion approving Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement for Removal and Disposal/Reuse of Districts' Residual Solids with Pima Gro Systems, Inc. , providing for an increase in volume and a reduction in cost from $33.50 per wet ton to $28.75 per wet ton; and authorizing the General Manager to execute said Amendment in form approved by the General Counsel. (2) Consideration of motion approving Amendment No. 4 to Agreement for Removal, Processing and Disposal of Sewage Solids with Recyc, Inc. , providing for a change in the method of computing the cost for said services to "dollars per wet ton of solids residuals removed" , and establishing said cost at $23 .00 per wet ton. `.. -9- 10/10/90 (13) ALL DISTRICTS , COns�r—aU6-n of the following actions relative to Supplement No. 1 to Program Environmental Impact Report for Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan re Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9: See page "CC. (a) verbal staff report (b) Public hearing on said Draft Supplement No. 1: (1) Open hearing (2) Consideration of motion to receive and file written comments relative to Draft Supplement No. 1 to said SIR, if any (3) Oral public comments (4) Close hearing (c) Consideration of motion directing the consultant to address any written or oral comments received on the Draft Supplement No. 1 to said EIR and to prepare the Final Supplement No. 1 to Program Environmental Impact Report for Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan re Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9, after the close of public comment period on October 10, 1990. (14) ALL DISTRICTS ConsiTeiaFi—o-n of the following actions relative to the Mitigated Negative Declaration re Purchase of a Site for a Wastewater Reclamation Plant in the City of Fullerton (See package enclosed with the Directors' agenda material) : (a) verbal staff report (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated September 19, 1990 re Mitigated Negative Declaration for said- project. (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file Initial. Study and Environmental Impact Assessment (d) Consideration of motion to receive and file the following written comments received on said project: City/Agency Dated State of California, Office of Planning and Research September 10, 1990 State of California, August 24, 1990 Department of Transportation, District 12 City of Tustin August 16, 1990 (a) Discussion/Oral comments (f) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-145, approving the �...� Mitigated Negative Declaration and authorizing filing of . a Notice of Determination. -10- 10/10/90 (15) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committees `../ written report of the meeting on September 26, 1990 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) (b) Consideration of action on the following items recommended by the Executive Committee: (1 ) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to participate with resentatives of other affected local public entities, including cities, special districts and the County, to obtain information pertaining to the County's Property Tax Administration Fee proposed to be implemented pursuant to SB 2557. (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-143, opposing Proposition 128: The California Environmental Protection Agt of 1990 on the November 1990 ballot; and directing the staff to distribute the resolution and information on the impact of Proposition 128 to the Districts and their ratepayers, to the media, including newspapers ads, public agencies in Orange County and others, as deemed appropriate and allowable under applicable statutes. See page "DD" ( 3) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to negotiate with Orange County suppliers of equipment compatible with the Districts ' telephone system and issue a purchase order contract to the Northern Telecom supplier with the lowest cost proposal for compatible equipment for Replacement/Upgrade of Northern Telecom Telephone System Switch Equipment (Specification No. E-192) , in an amount not to exceed $126 ,200.00 plus tax. (4) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to issue a purchase order contract for video Production Services, Specification No. 5-047 , to The Premium Group for a total amount not to exceed $32,925.00, to produce a new public information video on the Districts' wastewater management program. (5) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-144, approving Amendment No. 11 to Agreement for Employment of General Counsel. See page "EE" \� -11- 10/10/90 (16) ALL DISTRICTS Closed Session: During the course of conducting the siness set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards, the Chairman may convene the Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956 .9 or 54957.6 . Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employee compensation; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as final actions are taken by the Directors on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary (b) Reconvene in regular session (c) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session. (17 ) ALL DISTRICTS Ot ee—ass and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 18) DISTRICT 1 Ot—Fier business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (19) DISTRICT 1 Con ration of motion to adjourn (20) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21 ) DISTRICT 2 Consi eration of motion to adjourn ( 22) DISTRICT 3 Other uussiness and communicationsor supplemental agenda items, if any ( 23 ) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn . ( 24 ) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (25) DISTRICT 5 Consi eration of motion to adjourn -12- 10/10/90 • (26 ) DISTRICT 11 O er usiness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (27) DISTRICT 11 Considerion of motion to adjourn (28 ) DISTRICT 13 Other siness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (29 ) DISTRICT 13 Conga ion of motion to adjourn ( 30) DISTRICTS 6 7 6 14 Cons idara ion o he following actions relative to the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity to acquire right-of-way for the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A: (a) Verbal report of General Counsel (b) Public Hearing (1 ) Open hearing (2) Consideration of motion to receive and file written report of General Counsel dated September 18, 1990. See page "FF" ( 3) Consideration of motion to receive and file Proof of Service by Mail of Notice of Hearing to property owners dated September 25, 1990 (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file written comments from property owners, if any ( 5) Oral presentation by staff (6) Oral testimony by property owners and others (7) Close public hearing (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-148, describing a certain project; making statement of the public use for which certain property is to be taken in reference to statutory authority to acquire said property by eminent domain; describing general location and extent of said property to be taken; declaring findings and determinations on public interests and necessity for said property; authorizing and directing eminent domain proceedings to be commenced in Superior Court to acquire said property, including application for possession of said property prior to judgment; and _ making other determinations required in connection L✓ with the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1 , Contract No. 14-1-1A. See page "GG" -13- 10/1OL90 . _ (31) DISTRICT 6 Otter business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 32) DISTRICT 6 Conside—ration of motion to adjourn ( 33 ) DISTRICT 7 Oti— a siness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 34) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn ( 35) DISTRICT 14 Ottbusiness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 36 ) DISTRICT 14 Consideration of motion to adjourn -14- MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127. 408" Ellis Avenue of Orange County,California Fountain Valley, CA 92728.8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 JOINT BOARDS MEETING DATE October 10. 1990 at 7:30 p.m. The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting. ALL DISTRICTS 9(a) : AWARD PURCHASE OF MICROCOMPUTER HARDWARE. SOFTWARE AND ASSOCIATED PERIPHERALS, SPECIFICATION NO. E-191. The Districts utilize microcomputers (also known as personal computers or "PCs") for a wide variety of applications technically and administratively within each department and at each of the two treatment plants. Uses include word processing; spread sheets for data analysis and reporting; data base management for data collection, analysis, manipulation and storage; data acquisition for laboratory instruments; data modeling and statistical analysis; graphical data representation for analysis; and many more. The necessary growth of Districts activities and staff to keep pace with growing system demands and the attendant need for more sophisticated management and operational "tools" requires periodic purchases of additional microcomputer systems with related hardware, software and peripheral equipment. A total of 23 new systems are needed, together with related peripherals and equipment, and two existing systems are being reassigned. Three existing units (Alloy "slave" terminals) located in Operations at Treatment Plant No. 1 will be retired as a result of the purchase of three new systems. The retirement is due to age and obsolescence of the Alloy units. As a result, the net increase in the Districts' inventory will be 20. Assigned use of the new systems will be as follows: October 10, 1990- Ouantity cost Use 1 $ 2,016.81 Public Information Office 1 8,712.81 Graphics Coordinator/Information Services/Replacement Parts 1 6,025.81 Financial Manager 2 8,053.50 Purchasing: to complete a new Local Area Network 5 12,478.75 Operations and Maintenance Office: Additions to existing Local Area Network Support Staff: 2 units for clerical and 3 units for Engineers 4 14,582.11 Operations Center: new Local Area Network for Plant No. 2 3 9,229.41 Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse: Support Staff: 1 for Secretary and 2 for Principal Environmental Specialists 2 8,346.94 Laboratory: I for new Lab Manager and 1 for data acquisition 4 13,069.21 Source Control : Inspectors and Engineers 23 $82,515.35 Plus Sales Tax Bids were opened September 18, 1990. Nine bids were received. A comparison of the individual bids by line item shows that by considering the lowest bid item in each category, the Districts will save approximately $7,000.00. This savings is based upon the alternative of awarding the purchase to the single lowest bidder based upon the total of all items bid by that supplier. One bidder, Photo & Sound of Santa Ana, was eliminated because they did not submit the required Non-Collusion Affidavit. An analysis was performed comparing the lowest bid items from Photo & Sound with the second-lowest bid for the same categories. This analysis showed that the total difference was about $20. This is less than it would cost the Purchasing Division in administrative costs to cut a purchase order to another vendor, reinforcing our decision to not pursue Photo & Sound's Non-Collusion Affidavit. This action leaves eight different vendors to share the total order of all hardware, software and peripherals. Staff recommends award of Specification No. E-191, Purchase of Microcomputer Hardware, Software and Associated Peripherals, to eight bidders as itemized on the agenda listing, in a combined total amount of $82,515.35 plus sales tax. A bid tabulation is attached to the supporting agenda material . 9(b) : AWARD BLUEPRINTING. PHOTOCOPYING AND RELATED SERVICES. SPECIFICATION NO. 5-046 (REVISED) . Outside blueprinting, photocopying and related services are used for the purposes of high-volume reproduction of engineering construction project plans for bidding, and various reports and binding services required during the year -2- October 10, 1990 that cannot be performed as economically with the Districts' copying equipment. Consolidating purchase of copy services and awarding an annual contract to a ..r single vendor through the formal bidding process has resulted in a reduction of staff time and paperwork in individual ordering and invoice processing for payment of these services each time they are required. Three bids were received September 11, 1990 for a one-year period beginning October 15, 1990, with an option for four, one-year extensions. A summary bid tabulation is attached to the agenda supporting documents. Based on the estimated volume of expected future usage, the adjusted gross annual bid amounts ranged from a low of $118,060.56 to a high of $128,021.52, plus sales tax. All bidders offered a payment discount, ranging between 12% and 15%. Banana Blueprint, which affords the Districts a 15% discount on all invoices paid within 30 days, is the overall low bidder with an estimated net bid of $118,060.56, an approximate 8.07% lower cost than the current contract, based on items common to both years' usage. Staff recommends award to Banana Blueprint for a one-year contract, for the gross annual amount not to exceed $118,060.56, plus sales tax, for all services bid under this specification, with an option to renew up to four, one-year extensions. 9(c) : APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO PURCHASE ORDER NO. 34691 WITH OFFICE PAVILION/INTERIOR RESOURCES FOR PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING INTERIOR OFFICE PARTITIONING SYSTEMS AND FURNISHINGS. JOB NO. J-7-5. Job No. J-7-5 is with Office Pavilion/Interior Resources for the installation of all interior office space systems (partitions and furniture) for both the new and remodeled sections of the Administration Building at Reclamation Plant No. 1. The new administrative office addition and the rehabilitation of the old office building were designed several years ago but project construction has been delayed for various reasons. Because of the delayed construction, staff requested that Interior Resources store the partitioning systems and furniture in their warehouse until the new warehouse addition at Plant No. 1 was completed and the partitioning and furniture could then be stored in the Districts' warehouse. The Districts' warehouse is now complete and we can relocate the partitioning and furniture to the new warehouse area. The purpose of this change order is to pay Interior Resources the added cost of storing the partitioning and furniture from January 1990 through August 1990 and the cost to transport the partitioning to the Districts' warehouse. This change order adds $38,572.16 plus tax to the amount previously authorized. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 in the amount of $38,572.16, increasing the authorized maximum amount of the purchase order contract with Office Pavilion/Interior Resources from $966,855.53 to $1,005,427.60. N./ -3- October 10, 1990 . 9(d) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. J-19-2. Job No. J-19-2 at Plant No. 2 is part of the new $66 million master-planned Central Power Generation System which is being built under several contracts at both plants. It includes five digester gas-burning, spark-ignited 4167 HP engines with generators that are each capable of producing 3000 KW of electrical power at Plant No. 2. Change Order No. 1 adds $30,183.44 to the contract for five items of work. Item 1 is the emergency repair of a broken 8-inch interplant digester gas line at a cost of $2,812.44. Item 2 is the addition of two ground connections to the basement cable tray at a cost of $403.00. Item 3 is the addition of electrical power and controls inadvertently omitted from design drawings for a generator recirculation pump at a cost of $4,204.00. Item 4 is the addition of four valves and drainage piping to better isolate the system to accommodate future maintenance and operation activities at a cost of $21,918.00. Item 5 is for additional grounding connections to five generators at a cost of $846.00. The above-described changes are considered by staff to be corrections which would have been included in the original design if discovered or known prior to its completion. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 adding $30,183.44 to the contract with Brinderson Corporation. There is no time extension associated with this change order. 9(e) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO INSTALLATION OF REPLACEMENT INFLUENT METERS JOB NO. J-24 AND ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT AS COMPLETE. Job No. J-24, Installation of Replacement Influent Meters, includes the installation of twelve Districts' furnished flowmeters with associated piping, fourteen Districts' furnished flowmeter signal converters, and two flow monitoring computer systems with associated electrical and instrumentation wiring. The metering equipment serves two purposes. It allows for the calculation of flows from the respective Districts to enable allocation of joint construction and operating costs; and also enables calculation of our effluent mass ocean discharges to determine compliance with our NPDES permit requirements. The contract is now complete. (1) Change Order No. 2 Change Order No. 2, in the amount of $3,503.44, adds four items of work to the contract. Item 1, in the amount of $2,080.44, is for the electrical grounding of the two Knott Interceptor meters and the Coast Highway Trunk meter, located in the westerly (P2-11-1) meter vault to an existing ground rod in the easterly P2-11 meter vault. There were no provisions for grounding these meters in the P2-11-1 meter vault. Item 2, in the amount of $6,437.00 and 20 calendar days, is reimbursement for lost time incurred in three unsuccessful attempts to seat existing slide and sluice gates to isolate Plant No. 1 -4- ` October 10, 1990 Diversion Meter for installation of a new meter. It was finally determined that the work cannot be completed under this contract and �..i the meter will be installed under a separate contract when the slide gates are repaired and flow can be isolated from the meter. Accordingly, Item 3, a deduction of $2,000.00, is for the deletion of the installation of the Plant 1 Diversion meter from the contract. Item 4, a deduction of $3,014.00, is for the deletion of the programming requirements for the multi-channel computational devices supplied under the contract. New programming needs have now been identified because of evolving projects and programming will be performed by others under separate procurement procedures. The above-described changes would have been provided for in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items are for replaced work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 for a net addition of $3,503.44 and 20 calendar days to the contract with P. R. Burke Industrial Corp. (2) Acceptance of Contract as Complete P. R. Burke Industrial Corp. has fulfilled all contractual obligations within the specified and extended time. Therefore, staff recommends adoption of the resolution attached to the agenda material , authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the Final Closeout Agreement and filing the Notice of Completion as required. The final project cost is $236,194.81. 9(f) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 6 TO PRIMARY CLARIFIERS NOS. 6-15 AND RELATED FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-33. Job No. P1-33, Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, includes the construction of a new 60 mgd primary treatment facility and a new large diameter effluent piping network at a cost of $40.5 million, the largest single project ever awarded by the Districts. Change Order No. 6 adds $23,000.00 to the contract for one item of additional work. Item 1, in the amount of $23,000.00, provides for additional walls for the east and west ramp areas at the primary clarifiers to support the soil backfill ground elevations as shown on the contract plans. Also included in this item is the addition of a rustication strip to the concrete fluting of the north, east and west exterior walls of the primary clarifiers. The strip was not shown on the contract plans and is needed to conceal a required structural construction joint and to enhance the architectural finish of the fluted surfaces. The above-described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items are for replaced work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 6 for an addition of \/ $23,000.00 to the contract with Gust K. Newberg Construction Co. There is no time extension associated with this change order. -5- October 10, 1990- 9(g) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 TO GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-34-1. Job No. P1-34-1, Gas Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, includes the construction of a new city water pump station, a new power building, and a new gas compressor building at a cost of $13.1 million. The contract also includes supplying and installing three reciprocating compressors at Plant No. 1, and supplying three reciprocating compressors at Plant No. 2 for future installation by others. Change Order No. 3 adds three items of work and $9,644.00 to the contract. ., Item 1, in the amount of $5,500.00, is for the rerouting and modification of the area paving drain at the new asphalt paving east of the Metering and Diversion (M & D) Structure. The contract documents show the proposed drain flowing into an existing drain box. Field investigations have revealed that the existing catch basin drain was abandoned, requiring design of a new drainage system. Item 2, in the amount of $14,106.00, is for revisions to the pile caps at the Gas Compressor Building. The proposed piles were relocated and additional piles driven to avoid conflicts with existing old piles that were not disclosed in the contract documents. The relocation of piles required that the°pile caps also be redesigned. Item 3, a deduction of $9,962.00, is for rerouting of a proposed electrical duct bank from the City Water Pump Station to the existing M & D Structure. This item provides for connecting into and using an existing abandoned duct bank that is routed by the City Water Pump Station to the M & D Structure, in lieu of constructing a new one as shown on the plans. The above-described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items are for replaced work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 3 for an addition of $9,644.00 to the contract with Ziebarth & Alper. There is no time extension associated with this change order. 9(h) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 TO SLUDGE HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-34-2. This $19.4 million project includes the construction of a new sludge handling and truck loading facility, a new plant water pump station and power distribution building, the construction of a new 12 KV service center and minor improvements to existing sludge handling facilities. Change Order No. 5 adds one item of work and $32,309.00 to the contract. This change order provides for the installation of a temporary 84-inch steel bulkhead and pillow plug at an existing junction box on the 84-inch plant effluent line adjacent to the East Perimeter Road at Plant No. 1. The steel bulkhead and pillow plug were installed to allow diversion of all Plant No. 1 effluent flows to the 66-inch interplant sewer during the construction of the new Effluent Junction Box being built by the P1-33 contractor. (Removal of the bulkhead and plug will be paid for under a future change order to this contract.) The P1-33 contract documents did not include this work. Advanco Constructors were selected for this work because they had successfully performed this specific work on a previous contract and had the same supervision, work force and equipment to do so again. The work was also within their job site area. -6- October 10, 1990 The above-described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items are for replacement work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 5 for an addition of $32,309.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors. There is no time extension associated with this change order. 9(i) : AUTHORIZE SELECTION COMMITTEE TO NEGOTIATE ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS RE SECONDARY TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-36, AND SECONDARY TREATMENT EXPANSION AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-42. In October 1989, the Directors awarded a Professional Services Agreement for preparation of plans and specifications for design and construction support services for expansion of the secondary treatment facilities capacity at Plant No. 1 from 46 to 80 million gallons per day (mgd) ,. and from 75 to 90 mgd at Plant No. 2, including miscellaneous support facilities and replacement of certain existing engines with electric motors. The plans and specifications are currently 50% complete and the first construction job will be ready for bid the second quarter of 1991. In the last few months of design, several additional modifications and changes to existing facilities have been identified as being necessary which impact the original scope of work for this project. At Treatment Plant No. 2, the Districts are extending the secondary clarifiers by 50 feet to increase capacity from 75 mgd to 90 mgd. However, the existing old 78-i6ch outfall (now on standby status for emergencies) which is planned to be replaced by a new 120-inch outfall by the turn of the century in accordance with the 1989 Master Plan, must be moved to accommodate a new 84-inch secondary effluent pipe which will deliver secondary effluent to the Ocean Outfall Booster Station. Thus, instead of moving it, staff believes the 78-inch line should be replaced with the 120-inch line as part of this project, rather than three years from now as originally scheduled, to save money and construction activity. At the time this design contract was negotiated, the interference problem was not known. Staff therefore recommends that Addendum No. 1 include the replacement of the 78-inch line from just south of the plant, where the line would join the new 120-inch section installed as part of the Pacific Coast Highway bridge contract over the Santa Ana River, to Surge Tower No. 1. The Operations staff has determined other needed work including replacement of the scum collection system at the existing secondary clarifiers to match the new clarifier design; a new field laboratory for secondary process evaluation to be designed into the new satellite control station being constructed; and modifications to the existing drain system have also been identified as needed. Staff is therefore recommending that the Selection Committee be authorized to negotiate an addendum for the additional professional services for the design of Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36, and Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42. Following the Selection �./ Committee's negotiations, the proposed addendum will be presented to the Boards for consideration. -7- 1 October 10, 1990 9(j) : RECEIVE AND FILE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH J. T. HORVATH & ASSOCIATES FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION SERVICES. The Directors have previously authorized the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate professional services agreements for speciality consulting services necessary to assist in the construction management of various master-planned projects. Under that authority, several consultants have been retained, individually or through firms, to assist staff in the management and inspection of the largest construction effort in the Districts' history. The Districts currently have projects totalling some $150 million under construction at the Joint Treatment Works and in the individual District's collection systems. The workload of the concurrent projects has strained the Districts construction management resources and, therefore, staff has requested a proposal from J. T. Horvath & Associates to provide additional construction support services. Mr. Horvath will be assigned the construction management duties for the Control Center/Operations and Maintenance Building and the new Personnel Building, both at Plant No. 1. The Selection Committee has negotiated a professional services agreement with J. T. Horvath & Associates for a two-year period on an as-needed basis, at the following rates: First year - $35.00 per hour; second year $37.50 per hour. The agreement also includes reimbursement of direct expenses at cost. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee certification of the negotiated hourly rates, and adoption of a resolution approving the professional services agreement with J. T. Horvath & Associates. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the supporting agenda documents. 9(k) : RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH K. P. LINDSTROM, INC. FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES. Over the past several years, K. P. Lindstrom, Inc. has assisted the Districts with many environmental issues including preparation of Environmental Impact Reports, technical reports supporting our 301(h) ocean discharge permit applications, preparation of the Districts' California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Manual of Practice, and other environmental support activities on an as-needed basis. K. P. Lindstrom, Inc. provided extensive environmental review of our recently completed 30-year Master Plan and EIR. Staff and Directors have been very pleased with the work the company has done for the Districts in the past. The 1989 Master Plan has identified several projects which will require additional environmental and technical activities in order to secure the necessary regulatory agency permits. The Districts' ocean discharge permit application is currently being reviewed by the EPA and K. P. Lindstrom, Inc. , under separate authority, has been providing technical support in response to questions posed by EPA staff, as well as acting as a liaison for regulatory and -8- October 10, 1990 legislative activities affecting the permit. The firm's services are also needed to provide support on air quality, sludge management, water reclamation and conservation issues, as well as reviewing CEQA documents supporting our master plan projects. The Selection Committee solicited a proposal from K. P. Lindstrom and has negotiated a professional services agreement to provide environmental and technical support services for a two-year period for an amount not to exceed $164,500.00, based on hourly rates including overhead and profit, plus subconsultants fees and direct expenses. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above services and adoption of a resolution approving the Professional Services Agreement with K. P. Lindstrom, Inc. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the supporting agenda documents. 9(1) : AUTHORIZE SELECTION COMMITTEE TO NEGOTIATE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ECOSYSTEM ENGINEERING AND ANALYSES RE ECOLOGICAL CONSULTING AND STATISTICAL DATA ANALYSES. During the past few years our Compliance Division staff was technically enhanced to play a stronger role in the NPDES marine monitoring program. This was accomplished by adding key, highly trained and experienced personnel , providing new monitoring tools and computers for data management, increasing the oversight and scientific interaction with our prime ocean monitoring contractor (SAIC, Inc.) , and working cooperatively with local university experts in marine sciences. However, with ever-increasing environmental legislative and regulatory activity, even these initiatives fall short of what staff believes to be necessary to fully advise the Boards, state and federal legislators and regulators and the public on ecologically sound choices which must be made to implement and monitor the Districts' wastewater management program. Staff is, therefore, recommending utilization of outside consultants with expertise in key areas of ecosystem planning and analysis. The principal of Ecosystem Engineering and Analyses is Dr. John Calaprice, an expert in fisheries, multivariate statistical analyses, and planning and engineering of large scale ecological projects involving societal interaction with nature. Dr. Calaprice has previously worked with sanitation districts, including Los Angeles and Orange County, and with related projects such as the LA/OMA sludge program, and he is quite familiar with the special requirements and opportunities presented with the environmental utilization of wastewaters and sludges. Staff therefore recommends that the Boards authorize the Selection Committee to negotiate a contract for the needed consulting services of Dr. Calaprice. Following the Selection Committee's negotiations, the proposed agreement will be presented to the Boards for consideration. 9(m) : APPROVING GRANT OF EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON RE SERVICE FOR CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17. In December 1989, the Directors awarded a contract for the construction �./ of a Central Laboratory Building at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-17. This project includes a new electrical service transformer which will also serve the new Operations and Control Building now under design. -9- October 10, 1990 The service transformer receives a 12,000 volt power service from Southern California Edison (SCE) via an underground duct bank which enters the Plant No. 1 site just north of the Vehicle Maintenance Shop, heading in a southerly direction through the Vehicle Maintenance Shop parking lot to the Central Laboratory Building. The new duct bank and transformer will be owned by SCE which requires an operating easement for repair and maintenance of the incoming electric service. Staff therefore recommends approval of the resolution granting the easement to Southern California Edison. The form of easement has been approved by General Counsel . 9(n) : APPROVING AGREEMENT GRANTING EASEMENT AND OUITCLAIM DEED WITH THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH. The City of Newport Beach, having recently annexed to the Orange County Water District, is constructing a water transmission line to deliver groundwater to the City's water distribution system. As part of that effort, the City has requested permission to cross the Huntington Beach treatment plant site along the alignment of the proposed Banning Avenue/19th Street crossing. The line would be buried within Plant No. 2's northerly property and continue southeasterly under the Santa Ana River.` In the event a bridge is ever built to connect Banning Avenue with 19th Street, the line would be relocated by the City. The General Counsel has drafted an agreement that will grant the water line easement to the City. It also provides for the City to quitclaim to the Districts an older, inadequately referenced water line easement now owned by the City which crosses the plant diagonally. The proposed exchange of easements is at no cost to either party. The action appearing on the agenda is to approve the water line agreement between the Districts and the City of Newport Beach and to authorize the granting of the easement to the City in exchange for the City quitclaiming an old easement to the Districts. Staff recommends approval . DISTRICT 2 9(o) : RECEIVE, FILE AND APPROVE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WILLDAN ASSOCIATES FOR PREPARATION OF A PROJECT REPORT RE REHABILITATION OF CYPRESS AVENUE SUBTRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-9-R1. The Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9, was completed in February 1961 from Yorba Linda Boulevard to Imperial Highway following the natural drainage pattern of the area. The pipe, installed in the low-lying area of the drainage course, is an 18-inch V.C.P. in the lower reach and 15-inch V.C.P. in the upper reach. The original plans show little development adjacent to the pipe encasements at that time. However, because of encroaching development in this area, the lower-lying areas of the drainage course are slowly being filled-in which causes overburden on the existing pipe. As a result, the existing vitrified clay line is cracked and broken, and may require the line to be replaced and relocated in places. The Directors will recall that a recent repair was authorized and completed just west of the Orange Freeway crossing. Maintenance access is also limited, both by development and by lack of access easements. -10- October 10, 1990 In August the Directors authorized the Selection Committee to negotiate for the preparation of a project report to review the status of the line. The project report would include aerial maps to be used in preparing a new plan and profile, a review of access to the line at all locations to determine need for improved manhole access or relocation, a review of sewer interior video tapes to delineate areas where repairs are needed, recommendations on the methods of repair, a review of existing and proposed development with the developers and the applicable public planning departments, a review of the 1989 master plan flow projections for the line, required rights-of-way and easements and cost estimates. Proposals were solicited from four firms, three of which responded. The Selection Committee has negotiated a professional services agreement with Willdan Associates to prepare the Project Report for an amount not to $35,080.00, based on hourly rates plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants fees, and fixed profit. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and adopption of a resolution approving the Professional Services Agreement with Willdan Associates. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the supporting agenda documents. DISTRICT 3 9(p) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE REHABILITATION OF MANHOLES ON MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER. CONTRACT ON 3-33R This project, the last of four contracts for the rehabilitation of manholes on the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, was awarded in May 1990 in the original amount of $2,253,300.00. The work is located within the Cities of Cypress, Westminster, Huntington Beach, Garden Grove, La Mirada, Buena Park, La Palma, La Habra and Fullerton. Change Order No. 1, in the amount of $21,067.00, adds three items of work to the contract. Item 1, in the amount of $1,481.00, is for extra charges associated with removal of the top of Manhole 37 caused by an undisclosed City of Huntington Beach manhole located in close proximity to Manhole 37. Item 2, in the amount of $3,586.00, is for additional saw cutting to remove the top on Manhole 35 which was 6 inches thicker than that shown on the plans. Item 3, in the amount of $16,000.00, is for the rehabilitation of Manhole 93 in lieu of complete replacement. Manhole 93 is located in the interchange of the 91 Freeway and Valley View Street and replacement would have required extensive traffic interruption because of the deep excavation and removal of eight trees. The original bid cost for removal of the manhole is $41,000.00, which will be credited on the final change order (adjustment of Engineer's Quantities) for this job. Thus, the District will realize a net reduction of $25,000.00 for this change upon final project acceptance. The above-described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items are for replaced work. -11- October 10, 1990 Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1, adding $21,067.00 to the contract with Sancon Engineering, Inc. There is no time extension associated with this change order. DISTRICTS 5 AND 6 9(q) : RECEIVE. FILE AND DENY APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE LATE CLAIM SUBMITTED BY COMCAST CABLEVISION. The Districts have received an Application for Leave to File Late Claim from Comcast Cablevision dated September 10, 1990, for conduits allegedly damaged in the amount of $28,026.24 in connection with construction of Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Force Main and Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 5-29. The routine action appearing on the agenda is to receive, file and deny the Application for Leave to File Late Claim as recommended by the Districts' General Counsel . DISTRICT 6. 7 AND 14 9(r) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NOS. 3 AND 4 TO THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE BAKER-GISLER INTERCEPTOR FROM BRISTOL STREET TO FAIRVIEW ROAD. CONTRACT NO. 14-1-1B AND ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT AS COMPLETE. This $5.5 million project is the installation of vitrified clay and reinforced concrete gravity sewer lines located within the City of Costa Mesa in Baker Street from Fairview Road to Bristol Street. The contract, which also includes reimbursable street work for the City of Costa Mesa, is now complete. (1) Change Order No. 3 Change Order No. 3, in the amount $90,319.00, adds nine items of work and 13 calendar days to the contract. Items 1, 5, 6, and a portion of 9 will be reimbursed by the City of Costa Mesa. Item 4 will be reimbursed by the Mesa Consolidated Water District. Item 1, in the amount of $3,198.00, is for the installation of larger traffic detection loops, a change requested by the City. Item 2, in the amount of $2,156.00, is for added work caused by undisclosed water and gas lines. Item 3, in the amount of $9,472.00, is for the installation of permanent 10-inch sewer line bypasses around two Edison vaults. The vaults were not as shown on the plans. Item 4, in the amount of $2,527.00, is for replacement of backfill and paving for the 84-inch sewer line damaged by a leaking Mesa Consolidated Water District water line. Item 5, in the amount of $2,200.00, is for repair of a traffic conduit on the north side of Baker Street between Stations 72+50 and 72+30. Item 6, in the amount of $3.266.00, is for striping around a median island in the CALTRANS right-of-way per CALTRANS specifications. -12- October 10, 1990 Item 7, in the amount of $67,500.00, is a bonus payment for 135 days early completion of the project. The contract included a $500/day bonus/penalty provision. Item 8, at no cost, is for the substitution of 84-inch RCP in lieu of 81-inch RCP. Item 9 grants a ten calendar day time extension to the project. The above-described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items are for replaced work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 3 for an-addition of $90,319.00 and 13 calendar days to the contract with Steve Bubalo Construction Company. (2) Change Order No. 4 Change Order No. 4 is a net deduction of $28,641.00 which consists of one item for an adjustment of engineer's quantities for said project. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 4 to the contract for a net deduction of 128,641.00. (3) Acceptance of Contract as Complete Steve Bubalo Construction Company has fulfilled all contractual obligations within the specified and extended time. Therefore, staff recommends adoption of the resolution attached to the agenda material , authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the Final Closeout Agreement and filing the Notice of Completion as required. The final project cost is $5,544,470.30. DISTRICT 7 9(s) : RESCINDING PRIOR ACTIONS RE ANNEXATION NO. 125, APPROVING SEWER SERVICE AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS TO ANNEX TRACT NO. 9608 TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7. In March 1987 the Directors of District No. 7 received a request from Crawford Hills Development- Company to annex 292± acres in Tract No. 9608 located in the City of Orange near Chapman Avenue and Crawford Canyon Road to the District. In May 1987 the Directors authorized execution of an agreement providing for deferral of annexation fees on 110+ acres of dedicated park lands, established interest payment conditions for unpaid annexation fees; and adopted Resolution No. 87-39-7 authorizing the initiation of annexation proceedings, subject to execution of the agreement by the developer and other affected public agencies. Since then the developer has had the project on hold and, thus, the agreement has not been executed nor has the annexation been initiated with LAFCO. The developer is now ready to proceed with the annexation and has now requested approval of an agreement which provides for phased payment of the annexation fees and the exclusion of the park lands. (Large portions of the -13- October 10, d990 = tract have subsequently been dedicated to, or previously owned by, public agencies for park lands or open space, and those portions of the tract, totaling approximately 113 acres, are not included within the proposed annexation and sewer service agreement.) The annexation proposed now includes Lots 1 and 2 of Tract No. 9608. The lots total 182± acres on which are planned the construction of 381 single family residences. The annexation would be in accordance with the terms of the negotiated AB tax exchange for annexing properties. The developer has also now requested provision for the deferral of a portion of the annexation fees. The developer proposes to pay annexation fees for the first phase of tract development, about 123 acres ($466,785.00) , concurrent with execution of the agreement. The balance, covering approximately 59 acres ($283,905.00), would be paid upon the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy on developer's property. The deferred payment would accrue interest at prime rate plus 2.5%, subject to statutory limits. Because of the elimination of the park acreage from the annexation, and the phased payment request, approval of a new agreement and new authority to initiate proceedings is necessary. The General Counsel 's recommended actions are: (1) Rescind May 13, 1987 actions approving and authorizing execution of Agreement for Deferred Payment of Annexation Fees re Proposed Annexation No. 125. (2) Adopt Resolution No. 90-149-7, approving Sewer Service Agreement with Crawford Hills Associates providing for annexation and deferred payment of annexation acreage fees for a portion of the territory . contained in proposed Annexation No. 125. (3) Adopt Resolution No. 90-150-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex 182 acres of territory to the District located in the vicinity of Chapman Avenue and Crawford Canyon Road in the City of Orange, proposed Annexation No. 125 - Tract No. 9608 to County Sanitation Dfstrict No.7, and rescinding Resolution No. 87-39-7. Copies of the resolutions are attached to the supporting agenda material . ALL DISTRICTS 11: RECEIVE AND FILE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES WITH DAMES & MOORE FOR SEISMIC STUDY ELEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-38-3. AND SEISMIC STUDY ELEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-42-2. The Directors have previously authorized the Selection Committee to solicit proposals for design of miscellaneous improvements to facilities at both plants, Jobs Nos. P1-38 and P2-43. The work includes the rehabilitation or improvements to various plant facilities and processes, replacement of obsolete equipment and landscaping and security projects. The work originally included seismic studies of older treatment structures as well . The seismic studies were included to determine modifications that would reduce potential damage to joint works treatment plant and pipeline facilities in the event of an earthquake. v -14- October 10, 1990 After further review of the project, the Directors approved separating the seismic study from the rest of the work and authorized the Selection Committee to negotiate with Dames & Moore for this portion of the project. The scope of work provides for investigation of the Districts' existing structures to provide recommendations for rehabilitation based on economic and risk management criteria. Any design retrofit services found necessary would be negotiated separately at a later date. The Selection Committee has negotiated a fee with Dames & Moore, based on hourly rates for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed $460,000.00. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and adoption of a resolution approving a professional services agreement with Dames & Moore to provide engineering services for the Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. PI=38-3, and Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-2. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the agenda supporting documents. ALL DISTRICTS 12: REPORT OF THE CONSERVATION. RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE. The Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee met on September 27, 1990. Enclosed for the Directors is the Committee's written report and recommendations. 13: CEOA ACTIONS RE SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 TO PROGRAM EIR FOR COLLECTION. TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES MASTER PLAN RE INTERPLANT PIPELINE AND UTILITY CORRIDOR. JOB NO. I-9. In 1989 the Directors approved the comprehensive, updated Districts' wastewater management program master plan which provided for facilities necessary to meet flow increases and regulatory discharge requirements for the next 30 years. Also approved was a program environmental impact report (EIR) which addressed most of the master-planned projects. However, a few master-planned projects were only able to be addressed in a general manner in the-EIR and were designated as needing further review and additional CEQA documentation when they were ready to begin the design phase. Job No. I-9, Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, is one of those projects. In August, the Directors initiated the process by receiving the Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment, and authorizing the preparation and circulation of Draft Supplement No. 1 to the Program EIR for Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan for the Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9, in compliance with CEQA requirements. In September, the Directors set a public hearing and established the close of. comment period a5 October 10, 1990. Following a verbal staff report at the October loth Board meeting, the actions appearing on the agenda for consideration are to receive and file any .additional comments received on the Draft Supplement No. 1 to the EIR, and hold -15- } October 10, 1990 the public hearing. Following the hearing, the consultant should be directed to address any oral comments and any written comments received, and to prepare Final Supplement No. 1 to Program EIR for Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan re Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9, incorporating the comments and responses therein. A Staff Report and a copy of the Draft Supplement No. 1 were included with the September agenda material . The Staff Report is included again in this month's agenda attachments. If additional copies of the Draft Supplement No. 1 are desired, please contact Jean Tappan at 714/962-2411, extension 311. If any Board member has questions regarding the Draft Supplement No. 1 to Program EIR, please contact Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering, at extension 310. 14: CEOA ACTIONS RELATIVE TO MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION RE PURCHASE OF SITE FOR -A WASTEWATER RECLAMATION PLANT IN THE CITY OF FULLERTON. The 1989 Master Plan and Program Environmental Impact Report included a "Potential Water Reclamation Plants Reconnaissance Report". Eighteen sites were reviewed and prioritized. The most promising of these included sites at Crescent Basin, Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station and the Anaheim Forebay. The purpose of the reclamation plants would be the production of water almost comparable in quality to potable water systems for use in supplying certain industrial needs, landscape irrigation, and groundwater recharge. The Executive Committee, and most recently the new Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee, reviewed proposals for the purchase of a new site, a 5-3/4-acre parcel in the City of Fullerton on State College Boulevard just south of Orangethorpe Avenue, which was not one of the 18 parcels originally identified in the Master Plan. It is now the top-rated site. If the site is acquired and ultimately developed into a reclamation plant, it would substitute for the Crescent Basin site. In order to prepare a purchase agreement for consideration by the Directors, various onsite and offsite studies must be conducted, including a geotechnical analysis of the site with emphasis on possible underground contamination. The Waste Water Disposal Company (owners of the site) and the Directors both feel that a prepurchase agreement, outlining the conditions of sale including price, should be agreed to before additional funds are expended for the onsite investigation. The agreement will provide that should contamination be found it will be cleaned up to the satisfaction of the applicable agencies with all cleanup costs borne by the seller. Since the results of the geotechnical studies are necessary to prepare a complete program environmental impact report, a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared to allow the Districts to proceed with the preparation of a purchase agreement in accordance with CEQA. The Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment and the Mitigated Negative Declaration have been noticed and circulated as required by CEQA Guidelines. The enclosed Staff Report dated September 19, 1990 summarizes the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Staff is recommending that the Directors receive and file the Staff Report dated September 19, 1990, as well as the Initial Study and Environmental Assessment re the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project; receive and -16- October 10, 1990 file written comments received from the State of California, Office of Planning and Research, the Department of Transportation and the City of Tustin; and consideration of the resolution approving the Mitigated Negative Declaration. i 15: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF IXECUTIVE COMMITTEE. The Executive Committee met on September 26, 1990. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on its deliberations and recommendations for consideration by the Boards. 16: AGENDA FOR CLOSED SESSION. From time to time it is necessary for the Boards to convene in closed session to consider purchase and sale of real property, potential or pending litigation, personnel matters or other matters which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act. In order to avoid a situation where a closed session is needed but does not appear on the agenda, this standing item is placed on the agenda each month providing for a closed session at the regular meeting, if deemed necessary by the Boards. DISTRICTS 6 7 AND 14 30: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY TO ACQUIRE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR BAKER- GISLER INTERCEPTOR. CONTRACT NO. 14-1-1A. At the last meeting, the Boards adopted'Resolution No. 90-131 pertaining to setting October 10, 1990 at 7:30 p.m. in the Districts' offices for a public hearing on the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity to order the acquisition of certain property by eminent domain for the Baker-Gisler Interceptor from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A. As discussed at the last meeting, three property owners have objected to the routing of the sewer line through their property. We have been unable to negotiate the purchase of the required easements necessary from these three property owners. One of the property owners, Mesa Verde Country Club, has filed a legal action challenging the Districts' CEQA proceedings. It therefore appears that eminent domain action may be the only recourse if continued negotiations are unsuccessful . The other property owners are Southern California Edison Co. , and the lessee of property owned by Sanwa Bank. Accordingly, the General Counsel is recommending the action items appearing on the agenda to open a hearing, receive and file a report of the General Counsel , receive and file a proof of service of notice of the hearing, receive and file written comments from the property owners, close the hearing and adopt the Resolution of Necessity so that General Counsel can proceed to bring an eminent domain action if negotiations for purchase of the easements are unsuccessful . -17- RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 12 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .1 ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFONNIA ,oeaa Ew6 AVEMlE PO BOX 8127 FOUMUN VAtLv.0 FORMA 9272"12? O1AI%22AH September 27 , 1990 REPORT OF CONSERVATION. RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE Meeting Date: September 27 , 1990 - 5:30 p.m. COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF MEMBERS: Present: Present: Henry W. Wedaa, Chairman J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager John C. Cox Blake P. Anderson, Director of Richard B. Edgar Tech. Sery William D. Mahoney Charles Nichols, Conservation, Iry Pickler Reclamation and Reuse Manager Peer A. Swan Tom M. Dawes, Director of Grace Winchell Engineering Robert J. Ooten, Asst. Supt. , Operations Carolyn Bruskin, Principal Environmental Spec. Absent: Others Present: Edna Wilson Clark Ide, Assistant General Carrey J. Nelson Counsel Staffing Update In December 1989 upon recommendation of this Committee, the Board approved additional staff for the Conservation, Reclamation, and Reuse Division to help carry out the ambitious goals of the Districts- 30-year Action Plan adopted by the Directors last July. In the division there were a total of four positions authorized, including manager, secretary, and two principal environmental specialists. Charles Nichols, the division manager, reported that all four of the positions have now been filled. Water Reclamation Activities Staff presented information on a number of water reclamation activities including; federal legislation concerning the Southern California Water Reclamation Backbone System; state legislation concerning Water Quality Control Plans and Title 22 regulations for ground water recharge and surface irrigation with reclaimed water, proposed AB 1312 that now has become Proposition 148 on the November ballot, the Bay Delta water rights hearings and the District's participation in the Water Reclamation Sub-work Group; local activities including the Water 2000 Symposium and the District's sponsored Urban Water Management Plan one-day workshop. The staff discussed the potential water reclamation treatment plant sites in the Fullerton and Anaheim areas. Three potential sites were reviewed including a site owned by Waste Water Disposal Company, located in the City of Fullerton in the vicinity of State College Boulevard and Orangethorpe Avenue, a site known as the Crescent Basin site located in Anaheim near the I-5 and Brookhurst Ave. , and a site owned by the Unocal Corporation, located in Fullerton near Bastanchury Road and Brea Boulevard. Staff developed a scope of work for a brief study to evaluate the feasibility of these three sites, shared the scope with the City of Fullerton staff and expects the study costs to be shared with the Unocal Corp. Staff has begun the CEQA environmental process for the Waste - Water Disposal Company site in order to be prepared for continuing the site acquisition process (previously approved by the Boards) when action is required. A mitigated negative declaration was prepared and circulated to interested persons and agencies for comment. Appraisals have been conducted and the landowner is revising a draft purchase agreement. Staff expects the landowner to respond to the Districts by mid-October. Sludge Management Activities A. AMENDING AGREEMENT WITH PIMA GRO SYSTEMS INC.FOR REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL/REUSE OF DISTRICTS RESIDUAL SOLIDS In 1988 the Boards entered into a three-year agreement with Pima Gro Systems, Inc. (Pima Gro) to remove and reuse residual solids for beneficial agricultural use. This agreement was executed and included a cost of $33 .50 per wet ton and a guaranteed minimum quantity of sludge equal to five loads per day. Over the past two years, Pima Gro has . consistently performed its work in accordance with the contract terms and conditions. Among many contract provisions, there exists the opportunity to adjust the amount of sludge provided to Pima Gro from the Districts; to adjust the cost of sludge management, up or down, based upon the consumer price index for the greater Los Angeles/Orange County area for the previous year; or to adjust the cost down corresponding to increasing sludge quantities managed by Pima Gro. Pima Gro desires to increase the quantities of residual solids handled within this contract and to adjust downward the compensation per ton of sludge. Staff is recommending that the agreement, with Pima Gro Systems, Inc. for removal and agricultural use of Districts' dewatered sewage sludge be amended providing for a reduction in unit cost when Pima Gro removes an average of 260 wet tons per day (approximately 10 loads) . The cost for this level of service is established through joint negotiations, at $28.75 per wet ton of dewatered sewage sludge removed. Pima Gro is capable of reducing the unit cost to the Districts because the company will be able to double the tractor and trailer daily productivity. Presently, Pima Gro receives 5 loads per day of Districts' sludge from Plant No. 2. To deliver the sludge to land application sites, Pima Gro uses 5 separate tractor trailer units. Each unit operates only between 8 and 10 hours per day. By doubling the amount of Districts' sludge supplied to Pima Gro, the company will be able to use the same 5 units to remove twice as much sludge from the Districts. Pima Gro will hire 5 new drivers to accomplish this work. The additional 5 loads per day of sludge being provided to Pima Gro was formerly being delivered to the Coyote Canyon Landfill. With this revision, the Districts ' sludge reuse percentage will increase to an average of 65% compared to the current of 50%. Recommendation: The Committee recommends approving Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement for Removal and Disposal/Reuse of Districts' Residual Solids with Pima Gro Systems, Inc. , providing for an increase in volume and a reduction in cost from $33 .50 per wet ton to $28.75 per wet ton. B. AMENDING AGREEMENT WITH RECYC, INC. FOR REMOVAL, PROCESSING AND DISPOSAL/REUSE OF SEWAGE SLUDGE In 1988, the Boards first entered into a one-year contract with Recyc, Inc. , to remove sewage solids for processing into a compost material at a cost of $380.00 per truck load. Subsequently, the Boards amended the Recyc contract, in 1989 and 1990- extending its term for an additional year in each case. Recyc presently receives about ten loads per day out of the Districts' total production of 39 loads per day. Recyc presently removes sludge from Plant No. 1 only and is likely to only remove sludge from Plant No. 1 over the terms of any amended contract. Staff is recommending that the agreement with Recyc, Inc. be amended in two ways. The first amendment provides for a change in the method of computing compensation based on dollars Per wet ton removed as compared to past agreement language based on dollars Per truck load removed. This method of measurement is available now at Plant No. 1 and is more accurate than the previous method. Staff also recommends establishing the price for the removal, compost processing and disposal of the solids residuals at $23.00 per wet ton of solids residuals removed. This rate is 21% higher than the computed average for solids residuals management using the existing compensation method for past work. This increase is justifiable and warranted because Recyc has designed, permitted and constructed a new, upgraded compost facility in Riverside County that is farther away requiring added transportation expenses. Staff has compared this new rate with other Districts sludge management projects and other sludge management services available and found this proposal to be a very competitive rates. The previous compost facility in San Bernardino became unavailable due to local regulatory constraints. The new compost facility is located in the Temescal Canyon vicinity. It has been especially difficult for Recyc to obtain the final permit due to involvement with the endangered species, Stephens kangaroo rat. Agreements have now been reached on the habitat preservation in Riverside and San Bernardino counties allowing the permitting of many projects, including Recyc's new compost facility. Recommendation The Committee recommends approving Amendment No. 4 to Agreement for Removal, Processing and Disposal of Sewage Solids with Recyc, Inc. , providing for a change in the method of computing the cost for said services to "dollars per wet ton of solids residuals removed", and establishing said cost at $23.00 per wet ton. C. Phase II Sludge Management Implementation Plan The staff reported on current sludge production and distribution. .The discussion focused on current sludge management activities and the needs for diversity and cost- effectiveness in types of sludge reuse and agreements. `� Staff reported on the resource and schedule needs to fulfill the goals and objectives outlined in the Districts' Master Plan. Staff reported on 16 ongoing and new proposed projects and a ranking of these projects from high to low priority. Staff summarized the timing and needs for proposed added resources in the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Division including professional services assistance required to achieve the objectives. At the next meeting of the Committee staff will provide a finalized Phase II Sludge Management Implementation Plan for consideration by the Committee. Next Committee Meeting The Committee members set the next meeting for Thursday, October 25 at 5: 30 p.m. ref. 030146.rp Enclosure: Committee meeting material for 9/27/90. 1%W1 September 21, 1990 DISCUSSION OUTLINE CONSERVATION. RECLAMATION & REUSE COMMITTEE SEPTEMBER 27, 1990 I. opening Discussion Attachments A. Chairman's Report II. Staffing Update for Conservation, Goldenrod Reclamation and Reuse Division III. Water Reclamation Activities Followup A. Waste Water Disposal Company Site 1. Acquisition Status B. North Service Area Reclamation Facilities IV. Current Sludge Management Activities Beige A. Status Update 1. Sludge Production and Distribution a. , PIMA GRO Agricultural Land Application and Recommendation to Authorize Contract Revision Increasing Quantities and Reducing Unit Costs b. RECYC Composting and Recommendation to Authorize Contract Revision Increasing Unit Costs for Composting at New Site B. Sludge Management Implementation Plan & Phase II Consulting Services 1. Scope, Schedule and Budget 2. Recommendation for CRR Committee to Consider Approval of Implementation Plan 3. Recommendation for CRR Committee to Consider Approval of Selection Committee to be Formed and Request Consultant Proposals V. Other Business VI. Next Meeting Suggested; October 25, 1990; 5:30 pm. 2 September 21, 1990 STAFFING UPDATE FOR NEW CONSERVATION RECLAMATION AND REUSE DIVISION In mid-December of 1989, the Districts' Board of Directors approved a staffing plan for the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse (CRR) Division which authorized the addition of two professional staff members to focus on water reclamation and conservation issues. Immediately after that authorization, working with the Personnel Division, we posted .the notice for the two positions and advertised in local newspapers. As reported previously, the Districts had some difficulty recruiting qualified candidates to fill the principal environmental specialists slots. After interviewing more than 20 candidates, the two positions are now filled. The new staff members will be in attendance and introduced at the Committee meeting. 3 September 21, 1990 STAFF REPORT SLUDGE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM A. CURRENT STATUS The Districts are presently disposing of residual solids (dewatered sludge) by recycling portions of the sludge or by combining them with municipal refuse in a landfill in Los Angeles County. Our current production is about 39 loads per day. Each load averages 23 tons. About 50% of the sludge solids are disposed of at the landfill and 50% processed and recycled as a compost material or directly applied to agricultural land for beneficial reuse. Because of the difficulty of disposing of sludge and the tenuous nature of disposal alternatives, the Boards have adopted a policy of practicing multiple disposal options. Accordingly, the Districts have entered into contracts with four separate firms for sludge disposal and/or reuse under varying terms. The amendments discussed below are proposed for two of the contractors. 1) AMENDING AGREEMENT WITH PIMA GRO SYSTEMS INC. In 1988 the Boards entered into a three-year agreement with Pima Gro Systems, Inc. (Pima Gro) to remove and reuse residual solids for beneficial agricultural use. This agreement was executed and included a cost of $33 .50 per wet ton and a guaranteed minimum quantity of sludge equal to five loads per day. Over the past two years,, Pima Gro has consistently performed its work in accordance with the contract terms and conditions. Among many contract provisions, there exists the opportunity to adjust the amount of sludge provided to Pima Gro from the Districts; to adjust the cost of sludge management, up or down, based upon the consumer price index for the greater Los Angeles/Orange County area for the previous year; or to adjust the cost down corresponding to increasing sludge quantities managed by Pima Gro. Pima Gro desires to increase the quantities of residual solids handled within this contract and to adjust downward the compensation per ton of sludge. Staff is recommending that the agreement, with Pima Gro Systems, Inc. for removal and agricultural use of Districts ' dewatered sewage sludge be amended providing for a reduction in unit cost when Pima Gro removes an average of 260 wet tons per day (approximately 10 loads) . The cost for this level of service is established through joint negotiations, at $28.75 per wet 4 September 21, 1990 ton of dewatered sewage sludge removed. Pima Gro is capable of reducing the unit cost to the Districts because the company will be able to double the tractor and trailer daily productivity. Presently, Pima Gro receives 5 loads per day of Districts' sludge from Plant No. 2. To deliver the sludge to land application sites, Pima Gro uses 5 separate tractor trailer units. Each unit operates only between 8 and 10 hours per day. By doubling the amount of Districts' sludge supplied to Pima Gro, the company will be able to use the same 5 units to remove twice as much sludge from the Districts. Pima Gro will hire 5 new drivers to accomplish this work. The additional 5 loads per day of sludge being provided to Pima Gro was formerly being delivered to the Coyote Canyon Landfill. With this revision, the Districts' sludge reuse percentage will increase to an average of 65% compared to the current of 50%. 2) AMENDING AGREEMENT WITH RECYC. INC. In 1988, the Boards first entered into a one-year contract with Recyc, Inc. , to remove sewage solids for processing into a compost material at a cost of $380.00 per truck load. Subsequently, the Boards amended the Recyc contract, in 1989 and 1990 extending its term for an additional year in each case. Recyc presently receives about ten loads per day out of the Districts' total production of 39 loads per day. Recyc presently removes sludge from Plant No. 1 only and is likely to only remove sludge from Plant No. 1 over the terms of any amended contract. Staff is recommending that the agreement with Recyc, Inc. be amended in 2 ways. The first amendment provides for a change in the method of computing compensation based on dollars per wet ton removed as compared to past agreement language based on dollars per truck load removed. This method of measurement is available now at Plant No. 1 and is more accurate than the previous method. Staff also recommends establishing the price for the removal, compost processing and disposal of the solids residuals at $23 .00 per wet ton of solids residuals removed. This rate is 21% higher than the computed average for solids residuals management using the existing compensation method for past work. This increase is justifiable and warranted because Recyc has designed, permitted and constructed a new, upgraded compost facility in Riverside County that is farther away requiring added transportation expenses. Staff has compared this new rate with other Districts sludge 5 September 21, 1990 management projects and other sludge management services available and found this proposal to be a very competitive rate. The previous compost facility in San Bernardino became unavailable due to local regulatory constraints. The new compost facility is located in the Temescal Canyon vicinity. It has been especially difficult for Recyc to obtain the final permit due to involvement with the endangered species, Stephens kangaroo rat. Agreements have now been reached on the habitat preservation in Riverside and San Bernardino counties allowing the permitting of many projects, including Recyc's new compost facility. - B) PRELIMINARY REPORT ON SLUDGE MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN & PHASE II CONSULTING SERVICES In July of 1989, the Boards of Directors adopted a 30-year Master Plan for the facilities and services needed to protect public health and the environment of Orange County through a balanced, technically sound program of wastewater management. A part of this program included adoption of policies for the management of wastewater residual solids or sludge. The Boards current sludge management policies follow: • Implement multiple, sludge management options, under suitable separate and various contracts, to maximize interim and long-term residuals recycling while maintaining reliability. • Strive for 100% sludge recycling. . • Maintain at least one in - county land management option as a backup. • Plan cooperative sludge management programs as a lead agency or a member of a joint powers or other suitable arrangements. • Pursue and evaluate sludge management options for Board consideration. In addition to these goals focused on sludge management, the Boards adopted other policies, providing important guidance to the staff. A summary of these policies includes minimizing cross-media impacts; monitoring the environment to assure the effectiveness of programs; aggressively minimize and control toxics at their source; maintain compliance with all applicable laws, regulations and guidelines; conduct aggressive research and demonstration 6 September 21, 1990 programs in sludge composting and reuse; and conduct public education and community outreach on current issues. The staff has attempted to incorporate the features of all of these policies while creating the proposed sludge management implementation plan. The proposed plan is first founded in the Boards' policies; builds from the Districts' sludge quantities, sludge quality and experience to-date; identifies needed projects and activities; and concludes by summarizing the proposed plans' scope, schedule, budget and manpower resources. This proposed sludge management implementation plan concludes with staff's recommendation that the CRR Committee approve the plan and request the Selection Committee be authorized to request proposals from prequalified professional services firms to assist staff in completing this aggressive sludge management program. 1) SCOPE. SCHEDULE & BUDGET Background Integral building blocks for the Districts' proposed plan are it's sludge quantity and quality. Over the past 5 years as the Districts' sewage flows and treatment level increased, sludge quantities grew from about 120,000 wet tons of sludge in fiscal year 1985-86 to about 218,000 wet tons of sludge during fiscal year 1989-90. The Master Plan projected continuing increases in sludge quantities that correspond to the eventual treatment of 400 million gallons per day (mgd) of flow as compared to the present average of 268 mgd. This proposed implementation plan assumes the continuation of the Districts' NPDES permit providing a waiver from full secondary treatment. Sludge Management Program Priorities While the Districts' sludge quantities increased, over the past 5 years sludge quality has improved dramatically. Aggressive implementation of the Districts' toxics minimization and source control program has obviously paid dividends. Continuing implementation of the toxics control program, will assure the Districts' sludge quality is maintained and improved. Such an effort will add flexibility to the sludge management program and allow the Districts to be responsive to the changing regulatory scene. V� September 21, 1990 To accommodate unknowns in the evolution of federal and ... state sludge management regulations, staff has measured the current and near-term regulatory climate and carefully integrated this information into the proposed implementation plan. Over the next 3 years, staff anticipates substantial changes in regulations at both the federal and state levels. These changes will occur through EPA's 503 Technical Sludge Regulations, anticipated for promulgation in May 1992, and through California's response to the new Integrated Solid Waste Management Act pursuant to Assembly Bills 939 and 1820, that among other things focuses interest on solids recycling. Within this framework of sludge quantity, quality and regulations, staff has identified 16 needed projects to either continue or initiate. With this large number of projects needing attention, staff developed a prioritizing system to be certain the Districts' resources were focused on the proper projects. The prioritizing system uses "A", "B" and "C" levels with an A-project of immediate high priority while a C- project although also very important to the Districts' , has the advantage of long lead-times to reach completion. Staff developed 10 criteria to use in the prioritizing system. The criteria are itemized as follows: • Unavoidable Public Health Impact, • Unavoidable Environmental Impact, • Narrowing Window of Opportunity, • Gain in Cost-Effectiveness, • Only Agency Capable of Doing Work, • Considerable Advance in Reliability, • Will Rid Us of Complex or Difficult Task, • Will Improve Community Aesthetics; A Delay Jeopardizes Community Support, • Enhances Self-Sufficiency, • Mandated by Legal or Regulatory Requirements. 8 September 21, 1990 As an example, in Exhibit 1, the reader will note that unless action is taken to develop and implement a program to manage the Districts- private sludge contracts, the Districts face the real possibility of unavoidable impact to the public health and/or the environment. Furthermore by taking actions to implement this project the Districts are likely to gain program cost-effectiveness, build program reliability, avoid jeopardizing community support and be responsive to regulatory requirements. Shown in Exhibit 1, staff identified four projects as level "A" priority. These projects were: 1. to develop and implement a program of private contracts management; 2 . monitoring on-site sludge treatment compliance; 3 . developing the Coyote Canyon Landfill soil amendment project; and 4. providing federal and state legislative liaison. Between 5 and 7 checks of the 10 criteria are attributable to each of these projects. Staff identified five level "B" priority projects. These projects include: 5. maintaining sludge quality and tracking sludge quantity; 6. evaluating new optionsand sludge technology; 7. developing co-composting in Orange County; S. acquiring a local, District site; and 9. developing an agricultural fertilization project in the Central Valley. Each of these projects received between 4 and 7 of the 10 criteria were applicable. 9 EZEISIT L $4`` SLUDGE FDMGENENT PROTECTS PRIORITIZATION Gt JJ4 •� S�44 4 0 "I v J�yyJ h�4 49T� GOe¢ h�;ti G0 OTyyJ SS •4 •¢''1.�Sb 4' O y�4G.t ,`y qS�.F�JF�eQ i ¢4 y°j•y`S JJ .C�.1.•Q4 4yy ;Q�vG O,q�h;440 $S24h0�6�?�O$O'?w, T0 SO SGO aJryO .1�y2Glb �p* JOSF JOS40 Oq$;SGSq TpS$hO yt 444 h gG Oh ,qh S ;toy ;4 S O T 4a �044i SyyOS;4 ,�y'4SjjOOyT J,bL 0.1 O$4 c 04 GOSH' @04 SOq W JJ NQ4, "A" PRIORITY 1 Devel./Impl. a x z z z x x Private Contr. Mgt. Plan 2. On-Site a a a a a z z z Compl. 3. Devel. z z z a a a Coyote Canyon Soil Amendment a. Fed./State z a a a z Legisl. Liaison "S" PRIORITY S. Sludge Qual 8 a z a z s x Quant. Monit. 5. New Options a a S a & Technology 7. Co-Compost a a a a In-County 8. Acquire a z a x x Local Site 9. Central Val a a x z x Agri. Pert. "C" PRIORITY 10. Trans. Sys x x x 11. Mechanical x x x x Compost System 12. Chemical s z x x Fixation Demo. -13. Regional x x Planning/Coord 14. In-plant . x x x Reuse 15. Waste-To- a x x \� Energy Bioconv Development 16. Other R&D x x l I x September 21, 1990 The sludge quality and quantity project was not labeled as an "A"-level project even thought it received 7 checks. Staff concluded that existing, in-place staff and systems do an effective job of assuring the Districts meets the project needs. However, monitoring sludge quality and quantity and initiatives to improve sludge quality will remain a very important staff activity. Staff identified seven "C"-level priority projects. These projects include: 10. evaluating sludge transportation systems; 11. demonstrating and evaluating mechanical sludge composting technology; 12. demonstrating and evaluating sludge chemical fixation technology; 13. regional planning and coordination; 14. reuse of sludge or sludge-products in-plant; 15. development of waste-to-energy biomass conversion systems; and 16. other research and development of sludge management systems. Each of these projects were assigned between 2 and 4 of the 10 criteria. Issues To accomplish the work outlined in the 16 projects, staff developed a plan for each project. Each project plan identifies goals, a summary of the project and the expected results; documents the major tasks needed to complete the work; proposes a schedule and cash flow; identifies the manpower needs of staff and consultants; and lists known issues that potentially influence the project. Typical known issues are technical, environmental/CEQA, regulations/permits, political/community and land use. Scheduling Because the project plan information for all projects is voluminous (literally hundreds of pages) , staff summarized the information for this report. The list of projects is summarized in Exhibit 1. For each project, staff developed a calendar listing the tasks and their duration. These calendars will be available at the Committee meeting. Capital Costs From the Master Plan, staff summarized the estimated capital project costs over the 30-year, 1-2020 Vision" planning period. As shown in Exhibit 2, during that time period the Districts forecast project costs exceeding $137,000,000 for land acquisition, a compost facility, a landfill facility and support equipment. Staff cautions 11 `� EXHIBIT z SLUDGE HANAGEHENT ESTIHATED CAPITAL SCENE pp N4 3-E3EINN COICEI'FPfI W N LONiB PROIECTCOBEB ANO YaP1EYFMAl10110gIFO1RE IEMInWGCOW h WutlEMtlM0e4n) DATE PIIDECF REDO COST FWAE YEAR ENOWO ENE YEAR WCREEEWS W &ENIKA IIENOEY IIN SEIIY 6000 IEOY IWI Iffi Ie0) IOW IOW IOW IOW sm Ifef lOJ0 3001- 300E )011- Wif. 300f 0010 2016 3030 pu11 SIUDGE DISPO]µ WIAPOST DENCYIS)MlY]11 PlANl 2W2 CIO)AN 3.)00 E.IaO FACK 3003 fOd00 f.010 V3N 3),>M IAIf]Ah DE5 ]N Ie00 33.000 R.000 LAIIOPYLDEYEt OPEYENIHIASEI 3011 3LW0 3Y t,na IOp10 IOL10 f.)30 Eµ WWlITVEIOPEEE tHMSEI 3WI 15000 13.100 3.14 EMIal.t NT PUIICINSE ROSE 300I L1m E,WO FDIN'L@NI PUIILIUSE PINSE II 30I1 3.150 i.IFO tl LUOU[ )11)u ln,afo a.aea [doo is aoa aaa a.D1 a4eEa a),ue 1a.E10 la.lao tl,a)o September 21, 1990 - that these cost estimates are preliminary and subject to substantial change depending on further phase II determinations and many other factors but most importantly, federal and state regulations. The capital cash flow estimated in Exhibit 2 was incorporated into the Districts' bond capital needs assessment. Additional Staffing/Consulting Requests and Costs In addition to the estimated capital costs of the sludge management implementation plan, staff has prepared a preliminary estimate of the annual staff and consultant manpower staff and consultant manpower expenses summarized in Exhibit 3 . The manpower estimates shown in Exhibit 3 were derived from staff's detailed project plan for each project. The estimates assume a substantial manpower effort will be needed for the Districts to acquire, permit and develop a local site. Furthermore, based on staff' s best estimates of the work at this time, the manpower estimates include addition of up to two new full-time staff to the CRR Division over the next two years for sludge management related activities. The two additional personnel would be one for the site acquisition project and one to act as the private contracts inspector and manager. The latter would also be the reuse program's lead field person on such projects as the Coyote Canyon Landfill, the Central Valley agricultural fertilization, the composting demonstrations and the chemical fixation demonstration. As summarized in Exhibit 3 , staff estimated the consultant needs to accomplish this work. As much as $1.8 million in consulting services may be needed during the 5 year period ending in 1995. The bulk of these funds, $1. 3 million or 72%, was forecast for the Districts' site acquisition project. In the case of this particular project, it is difficult to accurately forecast both the expenses and timing. A preliminary summary of the proposed Phase II consulting services is shown in Attachment 1. 13 t EXHIBIT 3 PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL STAFF & CONSULTANT MANPOWER COOTS (Estimated Costs in thousands of dollars) Item of Work 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 Staff Cons. Staff Cons. Staff Cons. Staff Cons. Staff Cone. 1. Develop and Implement Private $21 $0 $39 $0 $39 $0 $39 $0 $39 $0 Contracts Management Plan 2. On-Site Compliance 2 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3. Develop Coyote Canyon Landfill 14 5 12 5 6 0 4 0 4 0 Soil Amendment 4. Federal & State Legislative 9 5 16 20 15 5 15 0 15 0 Liaison r 5. Sludge Quality & Quantity 4 2 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 Monitoring & Initiatives 6. New Options & Technology B 40 11 20 11 40 13 40 6 0 7. Co-Composting In-County a 10 6 5 9 0 9 0 7 0 B. Acquire Local Districts' Site S 150 44 250 44 250 44 250 44 400 9. Central Valley Agricultural 10 15 19 10 16 10 14 5 14 0 _ Fertilization io. Transportation Systems Eval. 0 0 0 0 3 20 0 0 0 0 11. Mechanical Composting Demo. 0 0 13 70 1 12 30 1 9 15 12 15 12. Chemical Fixation Demonstration 0 0 0 0 7 40 7 10 0 0 13. Regional Planning & Coordination 2 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 14 . III-Plant Reuse 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 15. Wl ste-To-Energy hiomass Convers. 2 0 2 5 3 20 5 20 A 0 16. Other H&,D 0 0 1 5 1 5 5 5 4 5 TOTALS $91 $227 $173 $390 $174 $420 1172 $345 $161 $420 September 21, 1990 Operating Costs In addition to the capital, staff and consultant expenses forecast for this period, the Districts' annual operating cost for sludge contract hauling, reuse and disposal is expected to equal $5.3 million based in fiscal year 1990-91. The annual expense for contract operations are expected to increase in-line with increasing sewage flows, treatment effectiveness and inflation. Staff added to the contract operating costs the estimated average annual expenses for staff labor and consultant labor to determine that the estimated average annual operating expense for sludge reuse and disposal would equal $5.814 million. Of this total, 91.2% equals direct operating costs while 8.8% equals manpower for program management and development. This information is summarized in Exhibit 4 . Recomendations: Staff will review the proposed Phase II Sludge Management Implementation Plan at the Committee's September 27 meeting. Following the review and Committee discussion, it would be appropriate for the Committee to: a. Direct staff to finalize the Phase II Sludge Management Implementation Plan for consideration by the Committee at its next meeting. b. Direct staff to finalize the consulting services request to carry out the Phase II Sludge Management Implementation Plan and to prepare appropriate scope of work for said services for the selection process in accordance with the Boards' established procedures. C. Direct staff to finalize the in-house staffing requirements for the administration of the Districts' sludge management program and report back to the Committee. 15 EXHIBIT 4 SLUDGE REUSE ESTIMATED AVERAGE ANNUAL OPERATING EXPENSES (Estimated costs in thousands of dollars) Item of Work Estimated Average Annual Cost 1. Contract Haul & Reuse/Disposal $5, 300 Operations 2. Staff Manpower 154 3 . Consultant Mannower 360 Total $5, 314 Note: The annual contract haul and reuse/disposal operations estimate for fiscal year 1990/91 based on sludge quantities equal to 220, 000 wet tons of sludge. These annual expenses are expected to increase in-line with increasing sewage flows, treatment effectiveness and inflation. -' 16 ATTACHMENT 1 PRELIMINARY SUMMARY OF PHASE II CONSULTING SERVICE REQUIREMENTS 1. Provide assistance related to the Coyote Canyon Landfill Soil Amendment project. including coordination with interested entities; development of project implementation plan; creation of contract specifications meeting needs of MOD; and assistance with project startup, monitoring and close out. _ 2. Provide assistance related to Federal and State Legislative Liaison including analysis of EPA 503 Technical Regulations to be issued in October 1990, May 1992 and May 1993 ; and analysis of State studies, policies and regulations proposed in response to AB 1820 and other legislative actions affecting the Districts sludge management program. 3 . Provide assistance related to New Options and Technology for sludge management including development of standardized proposal requests/responses for vendors interested in working with Districts; analysis of existing proposals compared to current operations; assistance drafting the Districts' 3-year and 10-year sludge management operations strategy report; collecting information on summarizing and assessing sludge management technologies; and assistance drafting the sludge management technology annual report. 4. Provide assistance related to Co-Composting In-County including an international survey of cc-composting technology and programs; coordination with interested entities; and assistance with the project implementation plan. 5. Provide assistance related to acquiring a local Districts' site including development of siting criteria, needs, options and concepts; site reconnaissance and availability determination; community relations and public information; site characterization and screening; site implementation plans; site CEQA; site permitting; site acquisition negotiations; and site predesign. - 6. Provide assistance related to the Central Valley Agricultural Fertilization project including site implementation plans for demonstration and full-scale projects; project feasibility analysis; field data collection; project CEQA; project permitting; contract specifications; and project startup, monitoring and closeout. 7 . Provide assistance .related to Evaluating Sludge Transportation Systems including analysis of available options compared to current operations; and determining the _ feasibility of alternative transportation technology. " Vwl 17 8 . Provide assistance related to the Mechanical Composting Systems Demonstration including a survey of technology and programs; coordination with interested entities; project implementation plan; and project feasibility analysis. 9. Provide assistance related to Waste-To-Energy Biomass Conversion including an international survey of biomass conversion technology and programs; analysis of available options; project feasibility analysis; and project implementation plans fordemonstration and full-scale projects. 10. Provide assistance related to Other Research and Development of sludge management options. CGN:ms ref: 030146.rp Attachment v 18 e RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14 �r MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION RE PURCHASE OF SITE FOR WASTEWATER RECLAMATION PLANT IN THE CITY OF FULLERTON ATTACHMENT COLOR - Staff Report Yellow - Initial Study and Environmental White Impact Assessment - Mitigated Negative Declaration Tan - Resolution No. 90-145 approving Light Green Mitigated Negative Declaration T E COUNTY SANRATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COONIY. CAUFORNIA September 19, 1990 108C ELLS AVENUE PO BOX 8127 fOUMAIN VA Y.CALIFORNIA WM4121 n1Ale62-2a11 STAFF REPORT Mitigated Negative Declaration re Purchase of Site for Wastewater Reclamation Plant in the City of Fullerton As part of the 1989 Master Plan and Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR), the Districts evaluated eighteen different sites for possible siting of wastewater reclamation facilities. The Program EIR recommended that additional supplemental environmental studies be performed for any proposed wastewater reclamation facilities once site-specific planning was initiated. The site identified in this Mitigated Negative Declaration was not one of the eighteen sites originally identified as a candidate due to its historical use, location and availability. The site is 5.74 acres of industrially zoned land located in the City of Fullerton at 1321 South State College Boulevard, about 1/4-mile north of the 91 Freeway and 1/2-mile west of the 57 Freeway and about 70 feet north of the border with the City of Anaheim. The Districts have elected to fulfill the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in a step or program manner prior to undertaking the project (including the purchase of the property and eventual construction and operation of the proposed wastewater reclamation facilities) . The first step is to complete onsite investigations and prepare a Program EIR addressing the impacts from using the site for a wastewater reclamation facility. The purchase of the property is an initial stage of a potential "project" and will be conditioned upon the Districts' Boards of Directors being satisfied with the information resulting from the onsite investigations and completion of a Program EIR. The proposed site is a prime candidate for a wastewater reclamation facility. As mentioned above, more detailed studies are required before further planning and design can proceed. Such studies will include the testing of the subsurface soils and groundwater. The purchase of the property is proceeding in advance of any detailed planning and engineering for the proposed wastewater facility due to its immediate availability and the above-mentioned need to do further studies onsite. The general area has been recommended for many years as a favorable site for a reclamation facility for tributary domestic wastewaters with subsequent industrial reuse, irrigation uses and groundwater recharge. The proposed project would involve property acquisition only. Due to the fact that the only "changes" resulting from the proposed project (purchase of the property) would be a change in ownership, the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment. However, the purchase would represent the first stage of a much larger "project", consisting of the construction and operation of a wastewater reclamation plant assuming that the site is deemed by the Districts' Boards of Directors to be suitable for such a use after �/ completion of onsite testing and further environmental and engineering r evaluations. Such evaluations will be summarized in a Program Environmental Impact Report prior to the finalization of purchase of the site. If there is unacceptable onsite contamination or the environmental impacts associated with �.s the project are unacceptable, then the project may not proceed as planned. However, such a determination can only be made after these studies are completed and sufficient information is available to make informed decisions. While there are no significant impacts associated with the purchase, the acquisition would lead to a larger "project", thus mitigation measures consisting of onsite testing and environmental studies and preparation of a Program Environmental Impact Report are recommended before close of escrow on purchase of the site. Onsite testing should be done to determine environmental conditions at the site (particularly focuses on potential water and soil contamination that would have to be mitigated) are compatible with its use as a wastewater reclamation plant site. Also, prior to finalizing the acquisition of the site, the Districts should complete a Program EIR for the planned project to build a wastewater reclamation facility. During this time, it is anticipated that the Waste Water Disposal Company would continue its present operations. Results of the onsite testing would be presented in the Program EIR. The potential purchase of the site and transfer of ownership will have no significant adverse impacts on the environment as long as a full environmental impact report is prepared and certified (including appropriate mitigation measures) prior to the close of escrow. Prior to purchase, the areas of soil and water quality will be adequately evaluated through adopted mitigation measures consisting of the completion of detailed geotechnical and hydrological studies which will evaluate soil and water quality. Other environmental impacts associated with possible use of the site as a wastewater reclamation facility will be addressed in a Program EIR prior to making any final decision by the Districts' Boards of Directors to purchase the property. To date, two comments have been received on the Notice of Preparation of Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment, as follows: " State of California, Department of Transportation, District 12 (August 24, 1990) : No comment other than an encroachment permit would be required should any portion of the project cross over or infringe on state facilities. " State of California, Office of Planning and Research (September 10, 1990) : Acknowledging compliance with State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental documents and stating that none of the state agencies have comments. Staff is recommending that the actions listed on the agenda be approved. INITIAL STUDY AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT RE: PURCHASE OF WASTE WATER DISPOSAL CO. PROPERTY LOCATED IN FULLERTON, CALIFORNIA FOR POTENTIAL USE FOR A WASTEWATER RECLAMATION FACILITY AUGUST 1990 LEAD AGENCY: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY POST OFFICE BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92728-8127 (714 ) 962-2411 CONTACT PERSON: Thomas M. Dawes SCH NUMBER: 90010777 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION Page 1 SUMMARY OF INITIAL STUDY AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION FINDINGS Page 2 INITIAL STUDY Page 6 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County will act as Lead Agency for the purchase of a vacant 5.74 acre parcel located in the City of Fullerton for possible use as a site for a wastewater reclamation facility. The site is currently owned by the Waste Water Disposal Company and is zoned for General Industrial use and is so designated in the City's General Plan. Studies of potential sites for constructing satellite wastewater reclamation plants throughout the Sanitation Districts' service area have shown that sites . are rather limited for an ideally located facility near all the required services and at a location where wastewater reuse can be optimized. As part of a 1989 Master Plan and Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) , the Sanitation Districts evaluated eighteen different sites for possible siting of wastewater reclamation facilities. The Program EIR recommended that additional supplemental environmental studies be performed for any proposed wastewater reclamation facilities once site-specific planning was initiated. The Waste Water Disposal Company site was not specifically addressed in the Master Plan Program EIR, but has been identified as a prime candidate due to its historical use, location, and availability. The Sanitation Districts has elected to fulfill the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act in a step-wise manner prior to undertaking the project (including the purchase of the property and eventual construction and operation of the proposed wastewater reclamation facilities) . The first stage is to complete on-site investigations and prepare a Program EIR addressing the impacts from using the site for a wastewater reclamation facility. The former two activities were recommended as mitigation measures during the preparation of this Negative Declaration to fulfill the requirements of CEQA for the potential purchase of the property. Purchase of the property is an initial stage of a potential "project" and will be conditioned upon the Sanitation Districts' Board of Directors being satisfied with the information resulting from the on-site investigations and completion of a Program EIR. The proposed site is a prime candidate for a wastewater - reclamation facility. As mentioned above, more detailed studies are required before further planning and design can proceed. Such studies will include the testing of the subsurface soils and groundwater. The purchase of the property is proceeding in advance of any detailed planning and engineering for the proposed wastewater reclamation facility due to its immediate availability and the above mentioned need to do further studies on-site. The general area has been recommended for many years as a favorable site for a reclamation facility for tributary domestic wastewaters with subsequent industrial reuse, irrigation uses and groundwater recharge. i This Mitigated Negative Declaration addresses the environmental impacts associated with the purchase of the proposed site and eventual use for construction of a wastewater reclamation plant. It recommends additional site-specific studies and a Program EIR addressing the specific impacts associated with the possible construction and operation of the wastewater treatment and reclamation facilities proposed for the site before close of escrow on the purchase. SUMMARY OF INITIAL STUDY AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION FINDINGS Title: PROPERTY ACQUISITION APN: 073-131-12 Location: (See attached Maps) The site (APN 073-131-12) is located at 1321 South State College Boulevard in the City of Fullerton, California (Figure 1) . Fullerton is located in northern Orange County, bounded by the cities of Buena Park, La Habra, Brea, Placentia and Anaheim. Description: The property is located at 1321 S. State College Boulevard in the City of Fullerton, California near the intersection of State College Boulevard and Orangethorpe Avenue. It Consists of a 5.74 acre site designated as Orange County APN 073-131-12 which has been designated and zoned by the City of Fullerton for industrial uses. It is presently owned by the Waste Water Disposal Co. and has been historically used for treating oil processing wastewaters. Purpose: The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County propose the purchase of this property for use as a. wastewater reclamation plant site as part of a cooperative effort with the Orange County Water District. Before any purchase is completed, the Sanitation Districts will obtain permission from the property owner to perform certain on-site testing to determine if there is any soil or groundwater contamination. These and other studies will be used in the preparation of 'a Program EIR addressing the impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed wastewater reclamation facilities. Entity or Person Undertakinc Proiect: county sanitation Districts of Orange County Administrative Offices: 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Mailing Address: (P.O. Box 8127) Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone Number: (714) 962-2411 2 Initial Study Summary: The conventional Initial study forms normally used for the assessment of environmental impacts are difficult to apply to the acquisition of property which is simply a change in ownership. �i However, the subsequent proposed use of the property for a wastewater reclamation plant will result in impacts which must be assessed as part of a separate CEQA document (Program EIR) which is proposed as a mitigation measure to be completed before the acquisition process is finalized. The potential .purchase of the site and transfer of ownership will have no significant adverse 'impacts on the environment as long as a full environmental impact report is prepared and certified (including appropriate mitigation measures) prior to the close of escrow. Prior to purchase, the areas of soil and water quality will be adequately evaluated through adopted mitigation measures consisting of the completion of detailed geotechnical and hydrological studies which will evaluate soil and water quality. Other environmental impacts associated with possible use of the site as a wastewater reclamation facility will be addressed in a Program EIR prior to making any final decision by the Sanitation Districts ' Boards of Directors to purchase the property. 3 EN71RORKENTAL REVIEW - CEQA INITIAL STUDY `..� County sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue (P.O. Box 8127) Fountain valley, CA 92728-8127 (714) 962-2411 In accordance with the Guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines adopted by the County Sanitation Districts in January 1988 and revised in June 1988, this document, combined with any attachments, constitutes the INITIAL STUDY of the below listed project. This INITIAL STUDY provides the basis for the determination whether the project may have a significant effect on the environment. I. PROJECT DATA A. Title: PROPERTY ACQUISITION APN: 073-131-12 8: Location: (See attached Maps, Figures 1 and 2) The site (APN 073-131-12) is located at 1321 South State College Boulevard in the City of Fullerton, California (Figure 1) . Fullerton is located in northern Orange County, bounded by the cities of Buena Park, La Habra, Brea, Placentia and Anaheim. C: Description: The property is located at 1321 S. State College Boulevard in the City of Fullerton, California near the intersection of State College Boulevard and Orangethorpe Avenue. It consists of a 5.74 acre site designated as Orange County APN 073-131-12 which has been designated and zoned by the City of Fullerton forindustrial uses. It is presently owned by the Waste Water Disposal Co. and has been historically used for treating oil processing waste waters. The site has unrestricted legal access to State College Boulevard; offsite improvements include asphalt street paving, concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street lighting. All standard utilities (electrical, natural gas, water and sewer) are in place and operational at the site. Existing structures . present at the site consist of stucco buildings housing administrative offices. workshop facilities, a large above ground tank, three large concrete- `/ 4 lined excavated basins which extend some 10-12 feet below the ground level which are used for treating oil field brines, piping, pumping equipment and equipment storage areas. D: Purpose., The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County propose the purchase of this property for use as a wastewater reclamation plant site as part of a cooperative effort with the Orange County Water District. Before any purchase is completed, the Sanitation Districts will obtain permission from the property owner to perform certain on-site testing to determine if there is any soil or groundwater contamination. These and other studies will be used in the preparation of a Program Environmental Impact Report addressing the impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed wastewater reclamation facilities. E. Entity or Person Undertakinc Protect: County Sanitation Districts of orange county Administrative Offices: 10844 Ellis Avenue ° Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Mailing Address: (P.O. Box 8127) Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone Number: (714) 962-2411 II. DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The climate of this area is profoundly influenced by the Pacific Ocean and its semi-permanent pressure systems that result in warm, dry summers and cool, wet winters. The project area has mean temperatures ranging from about 55 degrees Fahrenheit in January to 70 degrees F in August. However, during the summer the maximum temperatures reach as high as 100 degrees. Rainfall varies from year to year; however, the annual average is about 12 inches occurring primarily from November through April. Air quality standards are often exceeded in the area and it is a designated nonattainment area for several pollutants. The topography of the site is basically level except for the excavated ponds and berms on which landscaping has been planted around the perimeter on three sides. Soils on the site are sandy spoils of the Metz series and are poor for agriculture. They have been highly modified through years of use as an industrial site for processing petroleum wastewaters. 5 The project site is located in an area whose land uses are mainly industrial and commercial. The area is at the border between the Cities of Fullerton and Anaheim and adjoins a major flood control channel. The City of Fullerton General Plan designation for the parcel is industrial with the current zoning being MG, "General Industrial" . The area is a mix of commercial uses (primarily in Fullerton) and commercial/retail uses (primarily in Anaheim) . Surrounding uses include U. S . Rentals, "Fullerton Medical Center", self-storage facilities and multi-tenant retail uses (Figure 2) . To the south lies a flood control channel which leads to a large spreading basin located to the west of State College Boulevard. Transportation access to the site is via State College Boulevard with the site being located approximately 1/4 mile north of the 91 Freeway and 1/2-mile west of the 57 Freeway in the southeastern corner of the City of Fullerton, just 70 feet north of the City of Anaheim boundary. The site is now owned by the Waste Water Disposal Company, Inc. which operated a pre-treatment facility designed to treat oil field operating wastewaters. The facilities at the site are used to separate residual oil from highly saline waters (brines) before they are discharged to the Orange County Sanitation Districts ' local sewer system for conveyance and treatment at regional wastewater treatment facilities. The oil field brines from various oil companies are collected through an independent collection system consisting of two major pipelines which extend to Brea, Olinda and Yorba Linda. The site usage is dominated by three large concrete-lined treatment ponds used for separating oil from the waters received. There is a berm around portions of the site which has been landscaped to help screen the site from view. There are a few large trees on the site. Vegetation at the site consists of several large willow trees and other large shrubs and bushes planted around the perimeter on a berm to help screen the site. Security fencing surrounds the entire site and it has large gates to permit vehicle access. No known wildlife other than perhaps common birds, reptiles and small animals are found in the area. No known threatened, rare or endangered plants or animals exist at the site. There are no known archaeological , historical or cultural resources present at the site. 6 Electrical power for the area is provided by the Southern California Edison Company. Potable water for the area is provided by the City of Fullerton. Wastewater service is provided by the county Sanitation Districts of Orange County, District No. 2. Natural gas service is provided by the Southern California Gas Company. III. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS CHECKLIST (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) NOTE: THE CHECKLIST ANSWERS TO ALL OF THE QUESTIONS FOR THE SIMPLE PURCHASE OF THE PROPERTY AND TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP ARE ALL "No". THE ANSWERS WHICH FOLLOW ARE RELATED TO THE POSSIBLE FUTURE USE OF THE SITE AS A WASTEWATER RECLAMATION FACILITY WHICH WILL BE THE SUBJECT OF A PROGRAM EIR. Yes Maybe No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geological substructures? _X_ b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or uncovering of the soil? _X_ c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X d. The destruction, covering or modifica- tion of any unique geologic or physical features? X e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X 7 Yes Maybe No f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the �i bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? X 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterior- ation of ambient air quality? - _X_ b. The creation of objectionable odors? _X_ c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? _X_ 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? X C. Alteration to the course or flow of flood waters? X d. Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water? _X_ e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, in- cluding but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? _X_ f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of groundwaters? _X_ g. Change in the quantity of groundwaters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? _X_ V� 8 S Yes Maybe No h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? - _x_ i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? X 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in diversity of species, or num- ber of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants? _X_ b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? _X_ d. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the nor- mal replenishment of existing species? _X_ d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? _X_ 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects) ? _X_ b. Reduction of the numbers or any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? _X_ c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? _X_ d. Deterioration to existing fish or wild- life habitat? X 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? _X_ _ b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? x 9 Yes Maybe No 1%W1 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce light or glare? _X_ S. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? _X_ 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any na- tural resources? X 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? _X_ b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? _X_ 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? _X_ 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect exist- ing housing, or create a demand for addi- tional housing? _X_ 13. Transportation/circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? _X_ c. Substantial impact upon existing trans- portation systems? _X_ d. Alterations to present patterns of cir- culation or movement of people and/or goods? ,. _X_ e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? 10 Yes Maybe No �+�✓ f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? _X_ 14. Public services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? _X_ b. Police protection? _X_ c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X e. Maintenance of public facilities, in- cluding roads? _X_ f. Other governmental services? _X_ 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? _X_ b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? _X_ la. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alter- ations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? _X_ b. Communications systems? _ _ _X_ c. Water? X d. Sewer or septic tanks? _ _X_ e. Storm water drainage? _X_ f. Solid waste and disposal? _x 11 Yes Maybe No 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or poten- tial health hazard (excluding mental health) ? _X_ b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? X is. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? _X_ 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? _X_ 20. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the alter- ation of or the destruction of a pre- historic or historic archaeological site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a pre- historic or historic building, structure, or object? _X_ c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? _ _ _x_ d. Will the proposal restrict existing re- ligious or sacred uses with the potential impact area? X_ 21. Mandatory Findings of significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal 12 Yes Maybe No or eliminate important examples of California history or prehistory? _X_ �.� b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well into the future.) X c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) X d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? _X_ Iv. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation (Narrative description of environmental impacts. ) The proposed project would involve property acquisition only. Due to the fact that the only "changes" resulting from the proposed project (purchase of the property) would be a change in ownership, the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment. However, the purchase would represent the first stage of a much larger "project" , consisting of the construction and operation of a wastewater reclamation plant assuming that the site is deemed by the Sanitation Districts' Boards of Directors to be suitable for such a use after completion of on-site testing and further environmental and engineering evaluations. Such evaluations will be summarized in a Program Environmental Impact Report prior to the finalization of purchase of the site. If there is unacceptable on-site contamination or the environmental impacts associated with the project are unacceptable, then the project may not proceed as planned. However, such a determination can only be made after these studies are completed and sufficient information is available to make informed decisions. While there are no significant impacts associated with the purchase, the acquisition would lead to a larger "project", thus mitigation measures consisting of on-site testing and environmental studies and preparation of a Program Environmental Impact Report are recommended before close of escrow on purchase of the site. On-site testing should be done to determine if the 13 environmental conditions at the site (particularly focuses on potential water and soil contamination that would be to be mitigated) are compatible with its use as a wastewater reclamation plant site. Also, prior to finalizing the acquisition of the site, the Sanitation Districts should complete a Program Environmental Impact Report for the planned project to build a wastewater reclamation facility. During this time, it is anticipated that the Waste Water Disposal Company would continue its present operations. Results of the on-site testing would be presented in the Program EIR. 14 VI. Determination On the basis on this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a Sig- nificant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the miti- gation measures described below have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED (With SPECIFIED MITIGATION MEASURES) _X_ I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an EWIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. 'r * (fed 04 �. Dam omas M. Dawes Director of Engineering County Sanitation Districts of Orange County SPECIFIED MITIGATION MEASURES: 1) Completion of on-site studies to assess soil and water quality at the proposed property to be purchased. 2) Preparation of a Program Environmental Impact Report addressing the impacts associated with use of the property as a site for a wastewater reclamation facility to be certified by the Sanitation- Districts Boards of Directors before the close of escrow for the purchase of the proposed property. 15 EXPLANATION OF COMMENTS IN ITEM III OF INITIAL STUDY III. Environmental Impacts lb: Will the proposal result in disruptions, displacements, compaction or uncovering of the soil? YES Soil testing alongside and beneath the existing concrete-lined basins will be performed to determine soil quality and any need for excavation and removal. Eventual removal and construction activities will change the existing soil profiles and uncover soils. lc: Change in topography or ground surface relief features? MAYBE The degree to which the existing site must be modified to accommodate the proposed wastewater reclamation plant has not yet been determine, but changes in ground surface relief can be anticipated. is: Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? MAYBE Future proposed demolition and construction may increase wind erosion of soils. 2b: The creation of objectionable .odors? MAYBE The types of odor control facilities to be constructed has not yet been determined. 3b: Will the proposal result in changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? MAYBE The degree to which the site will be altered or paved has not yet been determined. 3d: Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water? MAYBE The existing basins will be removed and new facilities constructed if the proposed project is implemented. Reclaimed waste water from the proposed treatment plant could be stored in open ponds or basins. 6a: Increase in noise levels? YES There will be an increase in noise over existing levels during demolition and construction, but there is not likely to be any long-term impacts associated with the construction of a wastewater reclamation plant at the `J site based on past experience with similar facilities. 16 7: Will the proposal produce light or glare? MAYBE Security lighting and lighting for workers to view facilities is likely to increase if a reclamation plant �i is constructed in the future. No information is presently available, but this must be evaluated. 9: Will the proposal result in increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? YES Advanced wastewater treatment will use large amounts of energy and chemicals which will constitute an increase in the rate of use natural resources over conventional treatment. 15a: Will the proposal result in use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES Energy use will be substantially higher than existing uses at the site if a wastewater reclamation facility is constructed. 16a: Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the power or natural gas utilities? MAYBE The extent to which utility services would need to be modified to serve the needs of a wastewater reclamation plant have not yet been determined. 17 SANITATION DISTRICTS' SERVICE AREA a.Na u x..N. PROJECTD SITE • roNs� LOS uNw •• 3 B � oN.N" 1 / I aumoi aBBVB 7 i \ av�cx i MESA INVINI Bf�CM i I ll� Iwn.n. uue TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 V..�.ww. HUNTINGTON BEACH r RECLAMATION PLANT NO. I FOUNTAIN VALLEY viciB�x •nr F I GURE I u REGIONAL LOCATION MAP PARCEL MAP LEGEND IMIZN NIGH REACH EWUIPRENT B STEINY A CGAPANT 12 VASTEVATER DISMSAL CO. SPECTRUM SUN BELT O HARDENS WILDING SUPPLY IB HIGHWAY SAFETY. INC. O EuLLERTCN AEDICAL RENTER `J 11 U.S. RENTALS STOMM SPACE GRANDErHMPE AVE. I.9 ACRES — ! ! i--- ----------------! II 1.0 ACRES I ! a I m o 41 ACESI VASTEVATER DISPOSAL CDAPANT SITE �I 4.9 ACRES ! u W U90' I 143 .61 ' - -- T--- 1- ----J 994 PROPOSED SITE TO BE STUDIED & PURCHASED 1321 S. STATE COLLEGE BLVD. FULLERTON, CA. FIGURE 2 LOCATION MAP OF PROPOSED WASTEWATER RECLAMATION PLANT SITE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Lead Agency and Proiect Proponent: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Administrative Offices: 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Mailing Address: (P.O. Box 8127) Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone Number: (714)* 962-2411 Name or Description of Proiect: Proposed Property Acquisition of some 5.74 acres known as ' Assessors Parcel Number (APN) 073-131-12 , located in City of Fullerton, Orange County, California for use as a wastewater reclamation facility site. The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County propose the purchase of this property for use as a wastewater reclamation plant site as part of a cooperative effort with the Orange County Water District. Before any purchase is completed, the Sanitation Districts will obtain permission from the property owner to perform certain on-site testing to determine if there is any soil or groundwater contamination. These and other studies will be used in the preparation of a Program Environmental Impact Report addressing the impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed wastewater reclamation facilities. Proiect Location: The site (APN 073-131-12) is located at 1321 South State College Boulevard in the City of Fullerton, California (Figure 1) . Fullerton is located in northern orange County, bounded by the cities of Buena Park, La Habra, Brea, Placentia and Anaheim. Description of the Property: The property is located at 1321 South State College Boulevard in the City of Fullerton, California near the intersection of State College Boulevard and Orangethorpe Avenue. It consists of a 5. 74-acre site, designated as Orange County APN 073-131-12 , which has been designated and zoned by the City of Fullerton for industrial uses. It is presently owned by the Waste Water Disposal Co. and has been historically used for treating oil processing wastewaters. v The site has unrestricted legal access to State College Boulevard; offsite improvements include asphalt street paving, concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street lighting. All standard utilities (electrical, natural gas, water and sewer) are in place and operational at the site. Existing structures present at the site consist of stucco buildings housing administrative offices. workshop facilities, a large above ground tank, three large concrete-lined excavated basins which extend some 10-12 feet below the ground level which are used for treating oil field brines, piping, pumping equipment and equipment storage areas. Land Use Designation and Zoninc: The City of Fullerton General Plan designation for this area is industrial. The current zoning is MG, "General Industrial". Environmental Settinc: The site is a 5.74-acre parcel located along a primarily commercial thoroughfare (State College Boulevard) approximately 1/4-mile north of the 91 Freeway and 1/2-mile west of the 57 Freeway in the southeastern corner of the City of Fullerton, just 70 feet north of the City of Anaheim boundary. The area is a mix of commercial uses (primarily in Fullerton) and commercial/retail uses (primarily in Anaheim) . Surrounding uses include U. S. Rentals, "Fullerton Medical Center", self-storage facilities and multi-tenant retail uses (Figure 2) . To the south lies a flood control channel which leads to a large spreading basin located to the west of State College Boulevard. The site is now owned by the Waste Water Disposal Company, Inc. which operated a pre-treatment facility designed to treat oil field operating wastewaters. The facilities at the site are used to separate residual oil from highly saline waters (brines) before they are discharged to the Orange County Sanitation Districts local sewer system for conveyance and treatment at regional wastewater treatment facilities. The oil field brines from various oil companies are collected through an independent collection system consisting of two major pipelines which extend to Brea, Olinda and Yorba Linda. The site usage is dominated by three large concrete-lined treatment ponds used for separating oil from the waters received. There is a berm around portions of the site which has been landscaped to help screen the site from view. There are a few large trees on the site. There are no rare, threatened or endangered species of plants or animals know to exist at the site. -2- There are no known archaeological, cultural or historical resources known to exist at the site. Initial Study Summary: The conventional Initial Study forms normally used for the assessment of environmental impacts are difficult to apply to the acquisition of property which is simply a change ownership. However, the subsequent proposed use of the property for a wastewater reclamation plant will result in impacts which must be assessed as part of a separate CEQA document (Program EIR) which is proposed as a mitigation measure to be completed before the acquisition process is finalized. -3- RESOLUTION NO. 90-145 APPROVING MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION RE PURCHASE OF SITE FOR WASTEWATER RECLAMATION '�..� PLANT IN THE CITY OF FULLERTON A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION RE PURCHASE OF WASTEWATER RECLAMATION PLANT IN THE CITY OF FULLERTON, PROVIDING FOR NOTICE THEREOF AND DIRECTING FILING OF A NOTICE OF DETERMINATION • f > � f f ! S Y f � R t t ! t The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the project for which this determination is made is the PURCHASE OF A SITE FOR A WASTEWATER RECLAMATION PLANT IN THE CITY OF FULLERTON. The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County is the "Lead Agency" as defined by CEQA; and, Section 2. That an Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment, which said assessment is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" , of the environmental effects of said project have been undertaken and completed by the Districts, and the results thereof have been reviewed by these Boards; and, Section 3. Based on the findings of the Initial Study, these .Boards determine that the proposed project could have an effect on the environment,- but there will not be a significant effect because of the mitigation measures described within the Mitigated Negative Declaration which is attached hereto; and, Section 4. That said Mitigated Negative Declaration has been circulated for public review for a period from August 10, 1990 to October 10, 1990, during which time the following comments were received on the document: A. State of California, Office of Plannin and Research September 10, 1990 Acknowledging compliance with State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental documents and stating that none of the state agencies have comments. B. State of Calif en f Transportation, m District 12 August e990too comment other Than an encroachment permit would be required should any portion of the project cross over or infringe on state facilities. C. City of Tustin, (August 16, 1990): No comment Section 5. That these Boards hereby note all comments received on the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Purchase of a Site for a Wastewater Reclamation Plant in the City of Fullerton; and, Section 6. That, for reasons set forth in said Exhibit "A" and in accordance with the migitation measures incorporated therein and by this Resolution, it is hereby found that said project will not have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the Boards hereby approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration regarding the environmental impacts of said project; and, Section 7. That the Secretary be, and is hereby, authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution, the aforesaid Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment and the Mitigated Negative Declaration at the Districts' office to be available for public inspection and copying; and, Section B. That the Secretary be, and is hereby, authorized and directed to file a Notice of Determination in accordance with the Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1990. RE: AGENDA ITEM N0, 15 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 0 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA September 26, 1990 101344 ELL18 AVENUE 90 Box 8127 WUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 82728.8127 9141882.2411 REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Meeting Date: September 26, 1 - 5:30 p.m. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Present: Director Edward Allen Director Charles Sylvia William Mahoney Vice Joint Chairman Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Don R. Griffin Past Joint Chairman Richard B. Edgar Past Joint Chairman Norman E. Culver Past Joint Chairman STAFF PRESENT: James Wahner Chairman, District 1 Richard Polls Chairman, District 3 J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Evelyn Hart Chairman, District 5 Blake Anderson, Dir. of Tech. Services Ruthelyn Plummer Chairman, District 6 Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering Don E. Smith Chairman, District 7/Past JC Gary Streed, Director of Finance Grace Winchell Chairman, District it Ed Hodges, Sr. Facilities Manager, Hank Wades Chairman, District 13 Maintenance Peer A. Swan Chairman, District 14 Bob Ooten, Assistant Superintendent, Don Roth County Supervisor Operations Roger Stanton County Supervisor Patricia Gorzyca, Financial Manager Pat McNelly, Sr. Admin. Assistant Absent: Corinne Clawson, Public Info. Officer Buck Catlin Joint Chairman Iry Pickler Chairman, District 2 1) Fiscal Policy Committee Items. A. SB 2557 re Property Tax Administration Fee At the September Joint Board meeting the staff was asked to assess the impact of SB 2557 on the Districts. SB 2557 was part of the last-minute 1990-91 budget-balancing agreement between the Governor and the Legislature. Among many other unrelated provisions, SB 2557 allows counties to charge cities, schools and special districts for the costs of property tax administration, assessment, collection and allocation. The enclosed (pink) letter from the Orange County Auditor-Controller indicates his intent to charge the Sanitation Districts a 1.25% property tax administration fee in accordance with SB 2557. The current fee of .25% is assessed on each District's tax allocation from the basic levy and on our user fees that are collected on the tax bill . If the maximum fee is imposed, total tax collection expenses will increase from approximately $180,000 to approxi- mately $892,000 for the eight Sanitation Districts (District No. 14 is not �./ affected). The 1990 budget has already been adopted but the increased expense could be funded from existing reserves. (1 of 5) w Executive Committee Report September 26, 199b Recommendation: Fiscal Policy Committee Chairman Mahoney reported that its members discussed this issue at considerable length at their September 20th meeting. Because of the significant fiscal impact, the Committee recommended that the staff be authorized to participate with representatives of other affected local entities, including cities, special districts and the County, to obtain information and evaluate equitable resolutions pertaining to the County's Property Tax Administration Fee proposed to be implemented pursuant to SB 7557. The Executive Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee recommendation. B. Debt Financing Program Chairman Mahoney reported that on September 19th the finance team of Districts' staff members and consultants conducted a Directors' Workshop on Debt Financing which was well received by the 22 Directors in attendance. He further reported that over the next two months there will be considerable time and attention focused on our financing program as we proceed with the first debt issue. The Fiscal Policy Committee met Thursday evening, September 20th to continue its work with the finance team in developing the Districts' financing program and recommendations for the first issue. The enclosed (salmon) Preliminary Outline and Debt Financing Program Strategic Overview(s) , and Schedule, sets forth the Committee's deliberative process and time schedule. v Chairman Mahoney stated that this was an informational item only at this point. The Committee will meet again on October 17th to finalize its report and recommendations, which will be presented to the Executive Committee at their regular October meeting, and to the Joint Boards in November. 2) Air Quality Issues Status Report. The Committee members are well aware of the significant impact of emerging Air Quality legislation and regulations on the Districts' activities. We continue to work on numerous air quality Issues. Enclosed is a separate (grey) staff report on the status of three of the more currently relevant matters: the Federal Clean Air Act; the Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) for the South Coast Air Basin; and the status of the Districts' air toxics testing and evaluation in accordance with the requirements of the Toxics "Hot Spots" Information Act (AB 2588). Staff reviewed the enclosed status report on air quality issues utilizing the outlines attached to the report, and advised the Committee that they would keep the Directors apprised of further developments. (2 of 5) Executive Committee Report September 26, 1990 3) Proposition 128: The California Environmental Protection Act of 1990. Proposition 128 has qualified for the November 1990 ballot. If it passes there are several provisions that could have a direct and significant impact on the Districts. Staff has prepared the enclosed (green tint) report which summarizes those provisions of the Proposition that could potentially affect the Districts, with particular attention on those measures that could have the greatest impact on our programs. The enclosed news article was also circulated at the meeting. Staff reported that while its analysis attempts to provide a reasoned and succinct review, because of the complexities and ambiguities of the Proposition, it is extremely difficult to fully evaluate. The conventional wisdom is that if Proposition 128 does pass, it will undergo legal challenges. Nonetheless, given the "worst-case" scenario implied by the several pertinent sections of the initiative, the possible bottom line annual cost to the Districts could be in excess of $50,000,000 per year, as discussed in the staff report. Recommendation: After considerable discussion of Proposition 128's impacts, the Committee concluded that although it was a well-intended measure, as drafted, it contains many provisions that are extremely complex and technical , covers several unrelated subjects, is ill-suited for the initiative process, could cause major economic and water resource impacts and gives no real consideration to balancing economic, public health, environmental and resource ..� needs of California's citizens. The Committee therefore recommends that the Boards adopt a resolution opposing Proposition 128; and that staff be directed to distribute the resolution and information on its impacts on the Districts and their ratepayers to the media, including newspaper ads, Orange County public agencies and others as deemed appropriate and allowable under applicable statutes. Staff was also asked to investigate the feasibility of direct informational mailings to the Districts' constituents. (NOTE: During its review the Committee briefly discussed California statutes and judicial decisions that restrict public agency officials' activities and expenditure of public funds relative to ballot measures. Accordingly, subsequent to the meeting, the General Counsel prepared the enclosed (goldenrod) memorandum to the Board Members pertaining to the permissible level of District activity relating to the Proposition 128 ballot measure.) 4) Authorization to Negotiate for Replacement/Upgrade of Northern Telecom Telephone Systemwitch Equipment, Specification No. E-192. In 1985 the Districts installed a new telephone system for our internal use. Since that time there have been several organizational changes and staffing increases, in addition to growing requirements for computer and fax communications, that have caused the current system to reach its capacity. (3 of 5) w Executive Committee Report September 26, 1990 Staff reviewed the attached separate (buff) report recommending authorization to negotiate with Centel Business Systems, the supplier of our existing Northern Telecom system for upgrades to provide the needed capacity expansion and technological enhancements to accommodate future telecommunication needs, in an amount not to exceed $126,200 plus tax. Director Swan indicated that he believed that there were several Orange County suppliers who could possibly furnish the needed Northern Telecom System equipment upgrades and expansion. Recommendation: The Committee recommends that staff be authorized to negot ate w�ith range County suppliers of equipment compatible with the Districts' telephone system and issue a purchase order contract to the Northern Telecom supplier with the lowest cost proposal for compatible equipment for Replacement/Upgrade of Northern Telecom Telephone System Switch Equipment (Specification No. E-192) , in an amount not to exceed $126,200.00, plus tax. 5) Authorization to En a e The Premium Grou to Produce New Public nformation Video Video Production ervtces, pecification No. 5-047). As part of our ongoing "2020 VISION" public information program, the staff is proposing to produce a new public information video on the Districts' wastewater management program. Enclosed is a separate (ivory) staff report on the proposed new public information video, an analysis of the firms considered for the production, and a recommendation that staff be authorized to enter into an agreement with The Premium Group to produce the video, in an amount not to exceed $32,925.00 for Video Production Services, Specification No. S-047. Recommendation: The Executive Committee concurs with staff's recommendation. 6) Review of General Counsel 's Compensation. The Committee considered the enclosed request (tan) from the Districts' General Counsel for an increase in compensation proposed to take effect November 1, 1990. The last review was performed in June, 1989. The General Manager had previously advised the Committee that from his perspective, Mr. Woodruff continues to provide excellent legal services for the Districts. He considers him one of the top wastewater agency legal counsels in the nation. Mr. Woodruff has been very active in both AMSA and CASA. He is a past chair of both the CASA and AMSA attorneys' committees. Mr. Woodruff represents the Districts in a superior manner in legal matters bath inside and outside the agency. He has a very good relationship with Districts' staff members and continues to exhibit enthusiasm and energy in his representation of our interests. (4 of 5) Executive Committee Report September 26, 1990 Recommendation: The Committee reviewed the request in closed session and recommends approval of an amendment to the Agreement for Employment of General Counsel , incorporating increases in compensation in accordance with Mr. Woodruff's proposal , effective November 1, 1990. 7) Closed Session re Litigation and Personnel Matters. The Joint Chairman convened the Committee into closed session for a discussion of personnel matters and pending litigation. The General Counsel will report on the matter of litigation in closed- session at the Board meeting. Enclosed is a separate confidential report and recommendation on the personnel matter. JWS:sc Enclosures (5 of 5) aTEyEN E. AU OITOR{ONTRO ROLLA LLER G O U NTY O F FINANCE BUILDING E]0 NORTH ,ROADWAY Z 1 P. Aas, 9ANTA PNP,CA.93)03456) 5 RAN G E TELEPHONE: ,]4-3460 AREA CODE 714 OFFICE OF AUDITOR-CONTROLLER August 15, 1990 TO: All Orange County Property Taxing Agencies Attn: Finance Director/Business Manager SUBJECT: (1) Property Tax Administration Fee - Senate Bill 2557 (2) Cable Television Property Tax Appeals Property Tax Administration Fee - Senate Bill 2557 As part of the Staters last-minute budget-balancing process, Senate Bill 2557 was passed. This legislation, among many other unrelated provisions, allows counties to charge cities, schools, and special districts for the costs of property tax administration, assessment, collection, and allocation. This bill was hastily drafted and is subject to further legal interpretation, and possibly future clean-up legislation. Until I.s we receive further direction on this legislation, we are advising you to budget around 1. 25% of your total basic levy property taxes - the total of your current secured, public utility secured, current unsecured and homeowners subvention - for this administration charge. This estimate is based on a total property tax administration cost of $24 million, offset by around $4 million in revenues already collected for supplemental tax roll administration, special district 1/4% collection fee, and other property tax- related revenues, for a net chargeable cost of $20 million. These costs include applicable costs of the County Assessor, Treasurer-Tax Collector, and Auditor-Controller, and related overhead, as allowed by SB 2557. SB 2557 is not effective until January 1, 1991 , so no charges will be made until after that date . As provided in the legislation, cities will be charged by a direct deduction from their property tax allocations . Schools and special districts will receive invoices for their share of the costs. The costs will be allocated based on each agency ' s property tax share compared to the total property tax amount for all agencies in the County. ,i�F0132-]6 August 15, 1990 '- • Page 2 At this time, we do not anticipate charging bond interest and redemption funds directly for this new administration fee due to other statutory restrictions on these funds. However, the share of costs related to these funds will be spread over all other funds in the County. This cost is included in the 1.25% factor. The new legislation is not clear on whether the fee is to be charged to community redevelopment agencies. We will need a legal interpretation or clean-up legislation to determine this. We anticipate that the new property tax administration fee will replace the existing 1/4t collection fee which is currently charged only to special districts under Government Code Section 29142 . Therefore, special districts should plan to budget only the new charge. The share of costs allocated to the County General Fund , approximately $3 million, will not be recovered from other agencies. The County will absorb this share of the costs. Costs allocated to special districts under the control of the County Board of Supervisors, such as the County Fire Department and the Orange County Flood Control District, will be charged to those funds. Cable Television Assessment Anneals As you may have read in the local news , most of the cable television companies in orange County have appealed their property tax assessments to the Assessment Appeals Board. At issue is the Assessor's method of assessing these companies based on franchise market value considerations as opposed to cost valuation. Although we do not have firm estimates, a rough estimate of the total amount of taxes which may have to be refunded if the cable companies prevail is around $14 million. one case was recently decided in favor of one of the cable companies by the Assessment Appeals Board. Unfortunately, with this recent decision against the County on one of the appeals, we will be forced to impound taxes paid by the cable television companies pending ultimate resolution of all of the appeals . Because these cases will probably end up in court, it is likely that these taxes will be impounded for the foreseeable future. The cable television property taxes are paid on the unsecured roll . However, for purposes of estimating the impact of these impounds on your revenue, the amount can be estimated by taking 1. 1% of your current secured tax revenue estimate. This is the approximate amount that will be withheld from your unsecured tax -- allocations this year. �../ August 15, 1990 Page 3 The impact of this impound on bond interest and redemption funds for which tax rates are computed by this office has been allowed for in the delinquency rate used in calculating bond tax rates. ..s Agencies which compute their own bond tax rates - cities and some special districts - should plan to allow for this impound in computing their bond tax rates. L know this information is reaching you late in your budget process. However, this data was not available before now. Please call Chuck Krueger at 834-2722 or Neal Gruber at 834-4437 if you have any questions on the property tax administration fee or the cable television issue. Steven E. Lewis Auditor-Controller JMM:jr TaxFee/TMM V ' County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Fiscal Policy Committee Preliminary Outline Debt Financing Program Strategic Overview September 20, 1990 I. Brief Review of Goals of Finance Program A. Klement Capital Projects B. Stabilize User Fees C. Maintain or Drove Districts, Financial Health II. Klementatcn of Debt Financing Program A. Policy Concerns 1. Reserve Levels and Structure a. Current Reserve Levels 1. Operating Reserves by District 2. Capital Project Reserves by District No spending on Capital Projects b. Recommended Reserve Levels and Structure -- 1. operating Reserves by District 2. Capital Project Reserves by District 3. Contingency Reserve for Full Secondary Treatment 4. Fee Stabilization Fund 5. Pooled Reserve for Debt Service 2. General Strategic Initiatives a. Bond for Capital Projects in first part of implementation (first five years) b. Bond to replenish reserve monies expended in fiscal 1989-90 (to date) from reserves 3. Project Klementation a. Joint Projects Construction Fund Draws b. District Trunk Line Construction Fund Draws 4. User Fees a. 90-91: Budget Numbers are baseline assumption b. Future years: Budget Numbers are baseline assumption, with sensitivity analysis for range Page 2 - III. Method of Implementation A. Use Certificates of Participation Structure (Installment Sale) for Long-Term Debt B. Use Cash Flow Financing (Revenue Anticipation Notes) for each District C. Use Variable Rate Debt in an amount corresponding to reserve levels (total reserves) D. Use Fixed Rate Debt (long-term or intermediate term) for all other capital needs in excess of Variable rate debt capacity E. Invest Reserves in short-terns, high quality investments F. Investigate other opportunities to further reduce rates 1. Interest Rate Exchanges (swaps) 2. Investment Agreements 3. Forward Agreements UN90/PODFPSO9.2 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Fiscal Policy Committee Preliminary outline Debt Financing Initial Issue October 17, 1990 IV. Initial Issuance(s) A. Recommended Size of Initial Debt Program 1. Amount to be Reimbursed 2. Amount of Expenditures reasonably expected to be expended in 24 months 3. All Projects included in 24-month calculation B. Recommended Timing of Issuance 1. Be prepared by early November for both a fixed rate and floating rate issuance C. Fixed/Variable Rate Mix 1. All replenishment amounts would be replenished with variable rate debt 2. New capital expenditures financed with mix 3. Mix determined by market rates at time of issuance (and maximum variable rate debt capacity, per reserve level) v V. Specific Credit Denis of Issuance(s) A. Fixed Rate Debt as Senior Lien Considered 1. 1.25 coverage considered 2. Common Reserve pool considered 3. Rate Covenant considered 4. Pdditional Bonds test considered B. Floating Rate Debt as Subordinate Lien Considered 1. Coverage would be 1:1 2. Letter or line of credit 3. Rate Covenant considered VI. Other Areas of Interest A. Indenture could be structured to allow for individual districts to choose, within the same financing, either a long-term fixed rate structure, a floating rate structure, or an intermediate term rate B. Bond for future amounts is attractive interest rate environments (beyond 2-year rag=ements) UW90/PODFII10.1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS AI ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1O EW6 AVENUE V.0.EO%E127 September 13, 1990 O WMN VALLEY.cAUF %WM41n ,J 91412E2RA11 Financial Management Program Overview Develop Financial Management Policies To review policies regarding o Operating budgets o Capital Improve ent Budgets o Debt o Revenues o Reserves o Investment Practices o Accounting, Auditing and Financial Reports To implement policies regarding o Debt and Pay As-You Go Usage o Debt Structure Alternatives o Fixed and Variable Rate Debt o Short-Tern, Intermediate and Long-Terns Debt `/ O Credit Enhancement o Senior and Subordinated Debt o Method of Sale Establish Debt Management Program o Districts' Credit Rating Management To upgrade current ratings of Districts 1, 2, 3, 7 and 11 To achieve "A" or better ratings for remaining Districts To maintain or upgrade District ratings and to establish ongoing communications with the rating agencies o Long-Range Financial Management Policies and Practices To develop and maintain a 10-year cash flow model for bonding analysis purposes To develop a 5-year schedule of debt financings and user fee increase requirements Financial Management Program Overview - Page Two September 13, 1990 7b establish debt ratio Caps per District Establish Reserves Requiteeats per District o ongoing Pond Administration Establish haaelinu Trustee reports and administration reqiirmrorrtc Establish internal administration practices Develop an Asset Management Program 7b examine the Districts' current land utilization 7b explore potential revenue generation opportunities on Districts' lands Ongoing Redevelopment Agency Pass-Through Agreement Negotiation 7b identify past projected property tax revenue losses to Redevelopment Agencies. _ Rb develop a nnre proactive approach towards negotiating pass-through agreements with agencies. Develop Short-Perm Borrowing Program 7b establish a tax and revenue borrowing program 7b examine the use of following short-term financing techniques o Ccmnar^ial Paper o Bond Anticipated Notes o Bond Bank 2/PG.FM September 13, 1990 County Sanitation Districts of orange County 1990 Financing Preliminary Financing Schedule August 1990 September 19911 October 1990 S M T w T E S S M T w T E S S M T w T E s 1 2 3 4 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 5 6 7 8 9 10 it 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 28 29 30 31 30 Date Event Responsibilities Completed -Selection of Underwriter Finance Committee CompLeted -Board approves Underwriter B Counsel Board Completed -InitiaL meeting and tour of facilities ALL Parties Completed -Meeting to review structure B financial alternatives ALL Parties alternatives CompLeted -Review of cash flow timing CSDOC, MLCM 09/12/90 -Board meeting 09/14/90 -Financing alternatives evaluated by Finance team and CSDOC, MLCM preLiminary structure determined 09/17/90 -Finalize Board workshop presentation CSOOC, MLCM 09/18/90 -Preliminary meeting with Rating Agencies CSDOC, MLCM 09/19/90 -Board workshop ALL Parties 09/20/90 -Strategic Overview presented to FiscaL Policy Committee CSDOC, MLCM 09/20/90 -Initial documents meeting ALL Parties -Finance team sets date for review by Rating Agencies for mid-October 09/24/90 -Letter of Credit RFP (LOC) sent out MLCM -Trustee RFP sent out 09/25/90 -Drafts of LegaL documents circulated MLCM, BC, UC -Draft of Pre Liminary OfficiaL Statement (P.O.S.) circulated MLCM, UC -Preparation for Rating Agency presentations begins CSDOC, MLCM 09/26/90 -Esecutive Committee Meeting CSDOC, MLCM October 1990 Na mber 1990 S M I E I E S S M I a I E S 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 21 22 23 ZL 25 26 27 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 �.. 28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 Date Event Resoonsibilities 10/03/90 -LOC RFP's due beck and evaluated MLCM -Trustee RFP's due back and evaluated 10/04/90 -Documents meeting All Parties -LOC Bank selected by Finance Team for presentation CSDOC to Board 10/08/90 -Documents distributed All Parties 10/10/90 -Board meeting All Parties 10/17/90 -Financing recommendations presented to Fiscal Policy CSDOC, MLCM, GC, BC Coo ittee 10/19/90 -Documents meeting All Parties 10/22/90 -Printer selected CSDOC, MLCM 10/24/90 -Fiscal Policy Committee presents Financing recommendations to Executive Committee; P.O.S. Approval 10/26/90 -Revised documents circulated MLCM, BC, UC .... 10/30/90 -Ratings received MLCM 10/31/90 -P.O.S. to Printer MLCM, UC 11/01/90 -P.O.S. availab Le to uMder.rite, for distribution MLCM -Premarketing of issue commences MLCM -Obtain Committee on Uniform Security identification MLCM Procedures (CUSIP) numbers 11/14/90 -Board meeting -Approve legal Documents -Preliminary Pricing (Pricing call) CSDOC, MLCM 11/15/90 -Final Pricing and Sete (Fixed Or Variable Rate) CSDOC, MLCM -Closing (Variable Rate) 11/26/90 -Preclosing (Fixed Rate) 11/27/90 -Closing (Fixed Rate) CSDOC: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Board: CSDOC Board of Directors GC: _ GC: Rourke and Uoodruff UC: Orrick Herrington MLCM: Merrill Lynch Capital Markets T: Trustee \/ SC: Mudge Rose j? COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Y A ORANGE COUNY, CALIFORNIA 1MW MuS AVENUE PA.am 9127 MWMN VALLEY.CAUMANIA U720AIZZ 014) 2RA11 September 20, 1990 STAFF REPORT AIR QUALITY ISSUES UPDATE The purpose of this Staff Report is to provide the Directors with updates on the Federal Clean Air Act status, EPA's draft Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) for the South Coast Air Basin; and the status of the Sanitation Districts' air toxics testing and evaluation of our facilities in accordance with the requirements of the Toxics "Hot Spot" Information Act of 1987, AB 2588. Federal Clean Air Act The House and Senate have each passed their own versions of the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA) . Reconciliation of their differences in now occurring in the conference committee that has been meeting in earnest during September. Presently, the Congress is scheduled for an October 12 election recess with a \/ lame- duck session expected to begin in mid-November. This means that passage of the CAA is dependent upon quick agreement on a large number of very technical and politically-charged issues. If the conference committee is successful in reaching agreement, the Bill then goes to the President. President Bush has already indicated that he won't sign a bill that coats 10 percent more than the compromise hammered out by the White House and the Senate in the spring. This "standard" may have already been breached by the first major agreement reached by the conferees. During the second week of September, the conferees agreed on the first major piece of the CAA, namely, the 300 pages of Title I dealing with air quality non- attainment areas. The House version, which White House analysts believe is more expensive than the Senate/Administration version, was agreed to by the conferees. Title I, which establishes federal requirements for reducing ozone, carbon monoxide, oxides of nitrogen and fine particulates, will become far more restrictive on a national basis. Compliance schedules are designed to provide industrial sources with sufficient time to meet the new requirements. As now required under the old CAA, the responsibility for developing and enforcing air quality management plans are delegated to the states and their regional air districts. However, if a state or regional plan fails to achieve federal standards, then the EPA must develop an PIP. o./ 1 COUNTY SANITATION .DI§%ICTS 21 ORANGE COUNTY, CAOFORNIA iD W ELUB AVENUE v.aeoz819 _ FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 82728X 0191882$011 We are, of course, in a non-attainment area. However, for this air basin, the effects of these Title I federal provisions are minimal because the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) already has the most restrictive standards in the nation. We do not expect that the standards that the Sanitation Districts now most, or are scheduled to meet, will be significantly more restrictive as a result of the new CAA. There is one feature of the compromise version of Title I that is of particular importance to Southern California. It will continue existing requirements and court orders in effect at the time that the CAA becomes law. For Southern California, EPA has recently issued a draft PIP which will be finalized February 28, 1991 (see PIP analysis following) . Because it results from a court order pre-dating the CAA, it appears that the PIP may be saved and will remain in effect. Bargaining on the other titles of the CAA is now underway by the conferees. The conferees were discussing Mobile Sources (Title II) during this writing. Sanitation Districts' staff anticipates that California will have an easier time with any version of Title II because our mobile source standards are already more stringent than existing federal standards. However, there will be new standards on engine performance, evaporative emissions and gasoline characteristics that will be more restrictive for this air basin than are presently in force (again, see the following section on the PIP) . Title III, Air Toxics, is expected to be addressed before the election recess. The air toxics provisions of the CAA have been a major concern of the Sanitation Districts' staff for the last year-and-a-half. Staff has alerted Congressional and EPA staffers that a unified effort for understanding and controlling air toxic emissions from wastewater treatment plants. is essential. Sanitation Districts' staff has said that it will take a national five-year cooperative R&D effort to accomplish this goal. The Senate version of Title III delays wastewater treatment pollutant air toxics emission standards for five years and provides EPA the discretion to pursue cooperative studies with wastewater treatment agencies. The House version is silent on both counts. We have hoped that the EPA would be re'euired to participate in a five-year cooperative study program for wastewater treatment plant air toxics. We have provided our advise to House and Senate staffers as recently as mid-August. Now it's up to the conference committee. Federal Implementation Plan YFIP) On July 31, 1990, EPA Region IX issued the draft PIP for the South Coast Air Basin. EPA conducted a very informal workshop they called an -open house" on September 18. A formal public hearing is scheduled for October 22 at the Hyatt Regency Hotel in downtown Los Angeles. The close of formal comments is November 30. In accordance with a 1988 federal court order that found the original PIP to be inadequate, EPA must formalize this FIP by February 28, 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFONNIA 10 EWS AVENUE P.Q.MA 8127 PoIlN1AIN VALLEY,GUPoRNIA 92T2&812) U141882-'N11 1990. While many features of the draft PIP do not have direct impacts on the Sanitation Districts, there is one feature that will have a potentially significant adverse impact on our ability to construct new facilities in accordance with the needs identified in out 30-year Master Plan. This feature is wastewater treatment plant conformity with the Air Quality Management Plan. The FIP has four major components. They are: 1. EPA approval of the "commitment" to clean air reflected in the control measures contained in the AQMP, 2. EPA disapproval or request for changes for a few of the control measures contained in the AQMP, 3. Federal "core measures" that go into effect now and in the immediate future, and 4. Federal "backstop measures" that go into effect beginning in 1994 and beyond, if SCAQMD's Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) fails to achieve a four percent per year reduction in ozone and carbon monoxide. EPA's approval of the region's "commitment" to clean air is a. rather tenuous `/ concept and probably open to serious legal challenge. The problem is most measures of the AQMP are only in the form of a "plan" today. Only if a proposed action is enforceable can EPA count it as an effective clean air tool. SCAQMD or a local government must adopt a rule, ordinance or MOU to make a measure enforceable. And so, the AQMP is relatively weak according to EPA's own guidelines because most of it is still only a collection of unenforceable measures. The Federal Court has already agreed with the Clean Air Coalition law suit finalized in 1988 that to be adequate an FIP must demonstrate that future clean air success is likely. In the absence of enforceability, this FIP may lack this criterion. EPA's approval of the region's clean air commitment also includes endorsement of the two tests of conformity for wastewater treatment plants. They are: 1. Facilities construction must be staged according to the population projection of the regional growth management plan (which the Sanitation Districts do) and, 2. All local governments served by the wastewater treatment plant must conform to the AQMP (which Orange County and its cities do not) or the wastewater treatment plant in conjunction with EPA, CRWQCB, SCAQMD, SCAG and the local governments must adopt an approved mitigation plan (which the Sanitation Districts have not) . `�� 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS M ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA IMW ELUS AVENUE P.O.BOX 8127 I WMN VALLEY.CAUFORMA 82728f \ ' Ot418823Att �/ Sanitation Districts' staff has advocated for over a year that the second test is unachieveable, unenforceable and may seriously hinder our ability to construct water pollution control facilities. We are happy to report that our pleas have finally been heard by SCAG and SCAQMD staff. We are hopeful that ' the 1991 AQMP will reflect this regional change-of-heart by removing the second test of conformity for wastewater treatment plants. Unfortunately, the PIP, if adopted in its present form, may not tolerate removing the second test of wastewater treatment plant conformity resulting from regional public policy consensus. Thus, it could be that the FIP won't give us the flexibility to adjust the AQMP when we learn from our cutting-edge regional experiences. This feature of the FIP, if true, will be absolutely devastating to the notion of a living, flexible and responsive AQMP. The PIP may prevent the Sanitation Districts from building new water pollution control facilities. According to the PIP, the requirements of the AQMP for local governments to achieve job/housing targets are necessary. Also, the FIP says "indirect impacts of wastewater treatment facility expansion must not circumvent progress in achieving air quality standards" and that the provisions of the AQMP "requiring mitigation plans are adequate so long as they are implemented to fully offset the air quality impact of the non- conformity (local government) jurisdictions. Mitigation plans failing to meet this criteria would be disapproved by EPA." Without EPA approval, we will lose our ability to obtain permits for construct and operation activities. Our permits to construct issued by the SCAQMD and our ocean discharge permit issued by EPA and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) are subject to a test of conformity. If we fail to receive EPA approval then we will not receive SCAQMD or RWQCB permits. Without the permits we can not construct new facilities. Without new facilities we will eventually fail to meet our NPDES permit requirements (the proverbial "Catch 22") and we will be forced to consider a sewer moratorium that would reduce but not eliminate NPDES permit violations. EPA's disapproval or request for changes of certain features of the AQMP cover a limited but wide-ranging list of issues. The most important does not relate to the Sanitation Districts but it is so significant to the highway improvements in Orange County that it bears at least brief mention here. The Regional Mobility Plan (RMP) was adopted by SCAG last year. When taken into consideration with the Growth. Management Plan and Transportation Demand Management Measures, it will improve air quality in the basin even though more vehicles will be accommodated in the future. The basic tenet of the RMP is that if you reduce congestion and increase average vehicle speed you will reduce net emissions per mile travelled. This tenet works if you can evaluate 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS d ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA tosm nus Avows P.e6e%et" rmtxrux vnusr.uuwawa szrzeata `� ntn sezxn the air quality impacts of the RMP on a region-wide basis. But the FIF says transportation authorities can't use this macro project approach. Instead, the FIP insists that each transportation segment or corridor most stand on its own environmental merits. Sanitation Districts' staff understands, through conversations with several transportation authority staffers, that if this feature of the PIP remains as written, many transportation corridors identified in the RMP are doomed because they will show a net air pollution increase. The federal "core measures" deal with mobile sources. They require decreased gasoline volatility, oxygenated gasoline, reformulated gasoline, vapor recovery for marine vessels, new evaporative emissions controls on vehicles and new carbon monoxide emission standards for vehicles operating under cold weather conditions. These measures are designed to augment the existing AQMP measures and SCAQMD rules by significantly decreasing mobile source contributions to the carbon monoxide and ozone problems in this air basin. The federal "backstop measures" impact mobile and stationary sources. They automatically go into effect in 1994 unless EPA cancels them one-by-one because EPA is convinced that ozone and carbon monoxide are being reduced four percent per year. This, incidentally, is the federal standard of success. The AW requires a five percent per year reduction. The backstop measures include the reduction of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from all public and private facilities that discharge these compounds to the atmosphere. There is no minimum cut-off level. Operations that result in VOCs will have to be curtailed or control technology installed. The production, storage, use and disposal of commonly used organic compounds would be affected. The list of organic compounds range from cooking oils to high- strength industrial solvents. For the Sanitation Districts, VOC controls for most of our new facilities are already required by SCAQMD Rule 1401. VOC controls for existing facilities are contemplated under SCAQMD Proposed Rule 1179. The federal backstop measures also include emission standards for off-highway vehicles and mobile equipment, ultra-clean motor vehicles, and curtailment of rail, ship and aircraft operations. For Orange County, this could mean, for instance, limited commercial airline traffic at Sohn Wayne Airport and severe restrictions on diesel-powered rail traffic. Other measures include restrictions on pesticide use, commercial food preparation and petroleum use and storage. The backstop measure that has received the most media attention is the requirement that every vehicle would be banned from highway use one day per week. \i 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS N ONANGE COUNTY. CAUFONNIA 10W ftn61VEWE O.O.BOX 8127 fp WNVP .G WA82T�8127 EPA admits all of these backstop measures are extremely disruptive and draconian. But they characterize them as the "gorilla-in-the-closet" that is necessary to keep this air basin on a continuing path toward federal air quality standards attainment. Sanitation Districts' staff will continue to evaluate the FIP and will provide oral and written testimony to EPA according to EPA's schedule. The FIP is a very complex document numbering over 600 pages with serious implications on how Southern California will conduct both work and leisure activities in the future. Input from the Sanitation Districts and all impacted public agencies is essential for improving the FIP prior to its February 28, 1991 EPA adoption. Air Toxics Testing and Evaluation Status The California Air Toxics "Mot Spots" Information and Assessment Act of 1987 (AB 2588) mandates the development of a statewide emissions inventory of toxic air pollutants. Major stationary sources of air pollutants must submit updated air toxic emission inventories every two years. Certain stationary sources of toxic air pollutants are also subject to determining the theoretical human health risks associated with their operations. Both of the Sanitation Districts' wastewater treatment plants are subject to these requirements. The SCAQMD is responsible for administering this program in this air basin. -The Boards have previously authorized staff to hire consultants to prepare an inventory and source testing plan, participate in a cooperative joint powers source testing agreement consisting of a group of several California wastewater treatment plants, and to conduct our own source testing, as required by AS 2588. The Boards' authorization for this work now totals $850,000. The Sanitation Districts are in the process of completing the source testing to obtain toxic emission data from the various unit processes within our treatment facilities. This part of the AB 2588 work should be completed by the end of this calendar year. This source testing data will provide the Sanitation Districts with the concentrations of air toxicants (if any) contained in our various air streams. Once the source testing is completed, a pounds-per-day emissions estimate will be developed for each compound, in accordance with SCAQMD guidelines. Emission rates will be calculated based on the source testing results. All of the field data, calculation results, facility diagrams and facility plot plans will be combined into an "emissions inventory report". The report is scheduled to be submitted to the SCAQMD and the California Air Resources Board (CARE) in early 1991. Staff estimates that this portion of the work will cost an additional $250,000. 6 �• CouNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS A OMNSE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA 1WW an6 AVEMIE on eox ein fWMNNVA ..CAt1WebA22"",V a1419Wv 11 The final stage of the AS 2588 work will be the preparation of a "health risk assessment report". This report must include the preparation of a risk contour map for each of our plants and establishment theoretical zone of impact within which the health risk assessment is calculated using a computer model. At this time, the California State Department of Health Services requires that a very wide zone of impact, representing a one-in-a-ten-million risk contour, be used. However, SCAQMD specifies only a one-in-a-one-million contour. This is a much smaller area and the magnitude of the risk assessment work could also be smaller. Until this difference is sorted out, the magnitude of the required work is difficult to estimate. The health risk assessment for our facilities must include an air quality model, a meteorological data set, and complete census track information with significant receptors identified (day-care centers, hospitals, senior centers and schools) within the zone of impact. Taking all these factors into consideration, the health risk assessment most be performed in accordance with SCAQMD and CARS guidelines. Our health risk assessment must be completed by May 1991 and submitted to SCAQMD for review and approval. The Sanitation Districts' staff estimates that the cost of producing the health risk assessment report will also be another $250,000. There is a possibility that incorporating the emissions inventory report and the health risk assessment report into one document will streamline the effort of producing this information and save the Sanitation Districts money. This \� issue is presently under discussion with the Sanitation Districts' existing consultant on this project, J. M. Montgomery, Engineers, who are conducting our work, and that under the statewide pooled emissions estimation program (PEEP) mentioned above. Staff is continuing to evaluate this matter and will submit a recommendation to the Directors at a future meeting on how to proceed on the emission ' inventory and risk assessment portions of the work. BPA/ahh REP #010119.RP `/ 7 AIR TOXICS "HOT SPOTS" ACT • WHAT'S OUT THERE? WHERE IS IT? i WHAT'S HUMAN HEALTH IMPACTS? • INDUSTRIES, LARGE POTWS • 30 STATE POTWS, 6 LOCAL, 2 OURS • STEPS FOR COMPLETION 1 . WE SUBMIT TEST PLAN ($100k) 2. SCAQMD APPROVES TEST PLAN 3. WE CONDUCT TEST ($750k) 4. WE CALCULATE POUNDS PER DAY & REPORT ($250k) 5. SCAQMD DETERMINES RISK PRIORITY 6. WE CONDUCT RISK ASSESSMENT ($250k) 7. SCAQMD & STATE DECIDE "WHAT'S NEXT?" TOP - DOWN REQUIREMENTS FEDERAL CLEAN AIR ACT CALIFORNIA CLEAN AIR ACT Isi P AQMP BOTTOM - UP EVOLUTION FIP SIP AQMP AQMP (AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN) • TIES IN WITH RMP, GMP & RHNA 3/89 FINAL ADOPTION BY SCAG/SCAQMD • OVER 100 MEASURES ALTERNATE WORK & TRUCK SCHEDULES FREEWAY IMPROVEMENTS - ELECTRIC RAIL - ELECTRIC VEHICLES - GROWTH MANAGEMENT CONTROLS ON STATIONARY SOURCES • THREE TIERS I. NOW, CURRENT TECH II . 6-20 YEARS, EMERGING TECH NEW LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY III. FUTURE TECHNOLOGY & AUTHORITY • WASTEWATER CONFORMITY:OUCH ! FIP (FED. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN) • 1988 FEDERAL COURT DECISION • 7/31 /90 DRAFT BY EPA (S.F./D.C.) • 10/22/90 EPA HEARING • 11 /30/90 PUBLIC COMMENTS END • 2/28/91 EPA PROMULGATION • FOUR MAJOR ELEMENTS 1 . APPROVAL OF "COMMITMENT" OF SIP/AQMP 2. DISAPPROVAL OF SOME SIP/AQMP FEATURES 3. FEDERAL "CORE" MEASURES 4. FEDERAL "BACKSTOP" MEASURES L. SIP (STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN) 6/89 CAL. AIR RESOURCES BOARD ADOPTION • APPROVES/EMBODIES THE AQMP • 7/89 TO EPA FOR APPROVAL • SUBSEQUENT CHANGES TO AQMP WILL REQUIRE SIP CHANGES CAA (CLEAN AIR ACT) • 1970 AND 1977 VERSIONS • 1990 VERSION IN CONGRESSIONAL CONFERENCE COMMITTEE • 600 PAGES LONG • MAJOR FEATURES NON-ATTAINMENT AREAS PERMITS OZONE DEPLETION MOBILE SOURCES AIR TOXI CS ACID RAIN ENFORCEMENT • COST 9 FIP "SAVER" PROVISION COUNTY SANrrnnoN Dimas of ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFONNIA September 20, 1990 t Pinsaxel MLSA � u FOUNfAUI V<aEY,ULIiOPNa 82T!&atYl ntnttman ' M E M O R A N D U M T0: Rxecutive Committee. RE: Analysis of Proposition 128 The California Environmental Protection Act of 1990 AEA "Big Green" (YES on 128) AKA "The Hayden Initiative" (NO on 128) Proposition 128 on the November 1990 ballot is a complex and very lengthy (39 pages and about 16,000 words) proposition that is called the Environmental Protection Act of 1990. It contains nine separate sections or titles: I. Title II. Findings and Declarations III. Food safety and pesticides; worker safety IV. Greenhouse Gas Reduction, Stratospheric Ozone Layer Protection; Commercial and Residential Tree Planting; Ancient Redwood Forest Preservation and Reforestation Fund; Recycled Paper V. Bay, Estuarine and Ocean Water Protection VI. Office of Environmental Advocate VII. Rnforcement of the Act VIII. Governor's Responsibility IX. Technical Matters INTRODUCTION If passed by the voters of California on November 6, 1990 there are several provisions of Proposition 128 that will have a direct impact on the Districts in terms of both operations and finances. This staff report stmtmarizes only those provisions of Proposition 128 that could be construed in any way as affecting the Districts in general or any aspect of our operations in particular. It pays particular attention to those provisions of the proposition that could have the greatest potential impact on the Districts. This analysis of Proposition 128 is organized sequentially by Title and Section as they are denoted in the proposition and includes the specific item of concern, the Districts' staff analysis and cost impact. Since the people cannot vote for just those portions of the initiative that they agree on, opposition to any one section would mean opposition to the �� 1 o whole. Conversely, support of any one section would not necessary mean support of the whole. While this analysis attempts to provide a reasoned and succinct review of the proposition, because of the complexity and ambiguity of the numerous issues covered, the potential impacts faced by the Districts if 128 passes are difficult to assess. Therefore, the discussion that follows does not necessarily reflect the actual costs or impacts that the passage of. Proposition 128 will in fact bring to our agency, but is based on the opinions and expertise of several staff members who have contributed to this report. DISCUSSION Perhaps the most significant provision of the Act (to the Districts) is that the one that implies that full secondary treatment of all wastewater discharged into the ocean will be required by this Act and that all waivers from such treatment levels will be prohibited. Title 5, Section 21 of the Act states that, "On and after January 1. 2000, no publicly owned treatment work shall discharge pollutants to the waters of the Sanctuary (the ocean waters of the State of California) without at least secondary treatment, as defined in the federal Clean Water Act. No state aaencv or official shall approve, remDrove or concur in a waiver of such a secondary treatment requirement which would allow the discharge, after January 1. 2000, of pollutants to the waters of the sanctuary, without at least secondary treatment." (emphasis added In spite of the potentially wide-ranging impact of the above statement on the, Districts, the ballot summary of the proposition only mentions provisions that "Establish water quality criteria, monitoring plans" and makes no mention of the secondary treatment issue. Because many voters only read the ballot summary of propositions, it may not be clear to a majority that Proposition 128 calls for full secondary treatment by January 1, 2000. As a result, moat voters in the Districts' service areas may not be aware that a "YES" vote on 128 could mean long-term increases in' local sewer fees to fund the construction, operation and maintenance costs of such a program (not to mention the cost impacts of the other provisions of the proposition). Not specifically mentioning the secondary treatment requirement of Title 5 in the ballot summary could be construed as a purposeful oversight on the part of Attorney General John Van de Ramp who was a co-author of Proposition 128 along with State Assemblyman Tom Hayden, Bob Mulholland of the Sierra Club, Al Meyerhof£ of the Natural Resource Defense Council, Michael Picker and Carl Pope. The Districts are one of three wastewater treatment plants in California who currently operate with a 301(h) waiver. In addition, recent activity in San Diego indicates that they may renew their bid for a 301(h) waiver; and L.A. County Sanitation Districts are also still pursuing a waiver. Therefore the effect or potential effect on coastal dischargers could be significant. •In 2 6 DIY the case of the Districts, the added costs of providing full secondary treatment would be at least $1.4 billion. When we consider how such a large sum of public money could be otherwise be spent for the public good, this amount is equivalent to the cost of bringing all the public buildings in California to full earthquake standards. It is also difficult to estimate how passionately the average voter feels about this specific issue (full secondary treatment and its associated costs and benefits) and whether it behooves the Districts to provide updated public information about what a "YES" vote could mean economically and what environmental impacts such a vote would imply, i.e., increased sludge production and disposal/recycling costs, potential effects on growth, increased air quality impacts, and higher energy demands. Finally, pertaining to the issue of the waiver prohibition, Districts' Counsel has previously determined that it does not apply to our outfall because we discharge beyond the state waters (3-mile limit) into federal waters. TITLE 1 This simply says that the Act shall be known as the Environmental Protection Act of 1990. STAFF ANALYSIS None. TITLE 2 - Findings and Declarations The language of this section of greatest interest states, 'bur health, natural environment and quality of life are threatened by chemical pollution of the food which nourishes us, the air we breath and our ocean waters," and that, "These environmental problems arise from a common cause, our production of and dependence on toxic chemicals in all aspects of the economy." It goes on to claim that, "These problems are urgent issues requiring solutions now. Our state and federal governments have failed to resolve them, and have not adequately protected our health and environment. The public's trust has been compromised by special interests, and public confidence has been weakened by government's failure to act. It is therefore necessary to act by way of initiative to make the necessary changes in law." Toxics entering the ocean are discussed in terms of their effects on marine environment, ocean resources, water quality, and public safety. The last sentence of this section says that it is necessary to pass this Act, "To safeguard the People from toxic contamination by chemical poisons in the ' food supply, to reduce chemical pollution which contributes to global warming and the depletion of the ozone layer, to protect and increase the number of trees in the State thereby decreasing the production of chemicals and waste 3 gases which contribute to global warming and depletion of the ozone layer, and to protect California's marine resources and coastline from oil spills and pollution by toxic chemicals." 1 STAFF ANALYSIS `as' It is clear that much of the language in this section is intentionally virulent and filled with hyperbole, and is designed to engender fear in the minds of the voters. In the Orange County instance of protecting "California's marine resources and coastline from pollution by.toxic chemicals", the Districts have maintained a vigilant effort to keep toxics from entering the ocean through our aggressive source control program and have been a leader when it comes to ocean monitoring and protection of marine resources, pollution and odor abatement, air quality monitoring, reduction of emissions, and balanced environmental management. Cost Impact: None. TITLE THREE This section deals with changes to the Health and Safety Code concerning Food Safety and Pesticides. STAFF ANALYSIS Staff could find no part of this section that directly affects the Districts. There is the indirect and very limited effect that in further regulating pesticides, fewer pesticides would eventually enter the sewer through illegal disposal or other means. Cost Impact: None. TITLE FOUR ' SECTION 14. Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan Section 44390 calls for the creation of a plan by the Energy Resources Conservation Development Commission by January 1, 1993 that will reduce annual emissions of any gases which may contribute, directly or indirectly, to global warming. This plan also would provide for the maximum feasible net effective reduction in the global warming potential of these gases. The Act calls for a net reduction of 20% of carbon dioxide emissions by the year 2000 and 40% by 2010. Gases that must be reduced include but are not limited to carbon dioxide, CFCs, halons, nitrous oxide and methane, weighted to reflect their respective contributions to global warming. Carbon dioxide emitted from the production r. 4 of electricity consumed in California (but generated outside of California) is considered part of California's emissions. Section 44391 (a) requires that the provisions of the plan specified by Section 44390 related to energy conservation and development of electrical power generation shall be prepared and implemented by the Commission. The Commission shall consult with affected air quality districts in preparing and implementing the provisions of the Plan to ensure that those provisions will not interfere with the attainment or maintenance of state or federal ambient air quality standards. The.Air Resources Board shall be responsible for administering the provisions of the plan for stationary sources, area-wide sources, and may implement rules more effective in reducing emissions than measures contained in the plan. The plan provisions prepared by the Air Resources Board and any district shall be submitted to the Commission by June 30, 1992. All state and local agencies shall adopt any necessary regulations to implement the plan prepared and adopted pursuant to Section 44390, and shall not take any action inconsistent witH that Plan. STAFF ANALYSIS The proposition assumes that "Global Warming" is a proven and universally accepted scientific fact. It is neither. The scientific community and specialists are deeply divided on this issue. For example, NASA recently issued a report that global warming cannot be demonstrated through satellite- based data acquisition. Europe has just experienced two back-to-back record setting cold winters, and many scientists believe that the earth is actually experiencing a period between two ice ages. There is no technical basis that we are aware of for the 20% and 40% reduction figures required in Section 44390. This "micro-management" feature of the proposition may seriously impact its ability to respond to real-world experiences that regulations like these would eventually imply. Our digester gas is approximately one-third carbon dioxide. Therefore we will have to manage our digester gas for carbon dioxide at a significant cost. Very expensive monitors, carbon dioxide converters and inspection fees would be implied. No known technology of this kind is now used on digester gas. Cost Impact: Estimate $100,000 to $1,000,000 per year. SECTION 15: Stratospheric Ozone Layer Protection Section 44451 (a) (1) requires that by January 1, 1993, listed ozone depleting chemicals must be recovered and recycled to the maximum feasible extent during - the servicing or disposal of any air conditioning and refrigeration systems and appliances, including vehicular air conditioners, and during the disposal of building and appliance insulation. `/ 5 44451 (b) requires the reduction by 90% by January 1, 1993 of listed ozone depleting chemicals used by a person as solvents, blowing agents, defluxers, degreasers or any other industrial manufacturing purpose from the levels emitted by such person in 1988. 44452 (a) requires that no product that contains a listed ozone depleting chemical can be offered for sale or use as an aerosol product after January 1, 1992. 44453 (a) allows for the continued use or resale of an individual article which contains a listed chemical if such product was originally manufactured, sold or offered for sale or use before any applicable deadline in Sections 44451 and 44452. 44453 (b) allows the maintenance or service of any product containing a listed chemical, provided that after January 1, 1997, only recovered and recycled listed ozone depleting chemicals are used for such purposes. STAFF ANALYSIS The proposition assumes the existence of stratospheric ozone layer depletion. There is considerable international debate on this issue. While some research confirms this phenomenon, data does not consistently support its existence. For instance, only a minority of special scientific groups participating in a recent international expedition in Antarctica reported holes in the ozone layer over the southern polar cap, contrary to other widely reported scientific findings. The preliminary program of the World Ozone Meeting (March 3-15, 1990, in Monaco) indicates no consensus among international specialists. This part of the proposition basically repeats the provisions of the Montreal Protocol of 1987 and the London Protocol Agreement of 1990. These international agreements have established the regulatory trend at the federal, state and local level. A corresponding EPA rule (40 CFR Part 82) was promulgated on August 12, 198E and amended June 15, 1990. SCAQMD adopted a policy in April 1990 and strengthened it on July 23, 1990, by adopting a policy that reflects both Protocols. Therefore, international, federal and local regulations already exist to implement stratospheric ozone layer protection measures. However, they are more specific and take into consideration such factors as costs for consumers, adverse effects on competition, employment and ability to compete with foreign enterprises. The Districts would be required to'purchase ozone depleting chemical recycling equipment as part of our vehicle maintenance activities. Maintenance of the Districts' building and facility air-conditioning systems would require the same type of recovery equipment. Cost Impact: Estimate less than $50,000 per year. 6 �a„/ SECTION 16: Commercial and Residential Planting Section 65592 (a) requires that by December 1, 1991, the Resources Agency shall adopt regulations requiring that any person who constructs a project plant one tree for each five-hundred (500) square feet of such project. Section 65592 (b) requires that the trees selected must maximise air quality benefits (including absorption of gases that may contribute directly or indirectly to atmospheric warming) and energy conservation, and appropriate long-term maintenance of trees planted. Section 65592 (c) requires that such tree planting shall be done, in the following order of priority: on the site of the project; on private property, or along private streets, within five miles of the site of the new development; on public or private land, or along public streets, within the same geographic area. Section 65592 (d) requires that the regulations .shall establish procedures for payment of an appropriate fee to a locally designated agency, or other agency determined by the Resources Agency, in lieu of planting and maintenance, to be used solely for the planting and maintenance of trees. Section 65592 states that the regulations shall exempt any project of less than 500 square feet of construction, and projects involving the remodeling or replacement of a single family home. STAFF ANALYSIS a� The Districts have an ongoing program of tree planting for both aesthetic and environmental purposes. Specific tree selection for future landscaping projects may be limited by the proposition. It is not clear whether the 500 square feet provision applies to the entire acreage of the project or just the area encompassed by buildings. If it applies just to buildings, than the Districts' tree planting program already exceeds this requirement. Cost Impact: The coats to the Districts are unknown at this time but would be expected to be nominal. TITLE 5 SECTION 21: Bay, Marine and Ocean Protection Section 37010 states that "A Marine Resources Sanctuary is hereby created which includes all state marine bay, estuarine and ocean waters." (emphasis added) Section 37010 (b) states that, "On and after January 1, 2000, no publicly owned treatment work shall discharge pollutants to the waters of the Sanctuary without at least secondary treatment, as defined by the federal Clean Water V 7 Act. No state agency of official shall approve, reapprove or concur in a waiver of such a secondary treatment requirement which would allow the �.., discharge after January 1 2000 of pollutants to the waters of the Sanctuary, without at least secondary treatment." emphasis added) Section 37010 (c) states, "Where necessary to maintain, protect or enhance the quality of the waters of the Sanctuary or its resources, the State Lands Commission or the California Coastal Commission may issue cease and desist orders pursuant to the procedures of Government Code Sections 66637 through 66641 with respect to any permit, lease, license or other approval or authorization for any activity requiring a permit, lease, license or other approval or authorization. and may Levy administrative civil fines pursuant to procedures and limitatis of Government Code Sections 66641.5 through 66641.9. The on maximum. liability for any violation of an such cease and desist order shall not exceed $25,000 per day." emphasis added STAFF ANALYSIS - This Section could have a significant impact on our operations, budget, and construction activities if "the waters of the Sanctuary or its resources" is ultimately ruled to refer to the area where Our discharge occurs, which is actually in federal waters, nearly five miles off Orange County's coast, beyond the 3-mile limit of state waters. Also, there could be an argument made that this State initiative cannot supersede the provisions of the Federal Clean Water Act which specifically permits waivers from full secondary for those dischargers, such as the Districts, who can demonstrate a lack of significant environmental impact. It is likely that this entire matter could be subject to litigation. The proposition does not define what a 'Marine Sanctuary" is or what can be done with it. Newport Bay would become a marine sanctuary. What would this change mean to the boating, fishing, residential and commercial activities in and around the Bay? Districts' staff has no idea. The marine sanctuary created by the initiative for bays, estuaries and ocean waters does not clearly state what the limits of the "Sanctuary" would be, but since state waters are currently defined as being within a 3-mile limit of the shore, it could be assumed that this is what the authors meant. Some analysts of this proposition (including our counsel) argue that since we discharge our treated effluent more than three miles off shore into federal waters, the secondary treatment provision would not apply to us. EPA has in the past, deferred to the State on matters of water quality standards. Nonetheless, the fiscal impacts to comply with the proposition are greater than those of implementing Scenario 3 (full secondary, treatment) of the Action Plan for Wastewater Management (2020 VISION) because of the accelerated construction and funding schedule that would have to take place during the next 9 years. The Districts could not be operating at full secondary by January 1, 2000 because it is simply impossible to plan, design, obtain permits and construct such facilities in such a short period of time. Our Master Plan evaluation 8 1r. concluded that it would take 15 years to construct the facilities needed to achieve full secondary treatment. `.d Implementing Scenario 3 would cost the Districts' rate-payers more than $1.4 billion over the next 30 years as compared to maintaining the current level of treatment which is slightly more than one-half secondary treatment. If the Districts are required to implement this Section but are unable to do so by January 1, 2000, we could face fines up to $25,000 per day according to the proposition. Subject to legal determinations, this Section could have the greatest effect on the Districts. The Districts have demonstrated that full secondary treatment of all wastewater discharged into ocean waters off Orange County through our 5-mile, 200-foot deep ocean outfall is not necessary to meat the requirements of the Clean Water Act or protect the environment and public health. Following five years of operating with our 301(h) waiver, and the extensive ocean monitoring program we have conducted, staff has found no indication that increased treatment to full secondary would result in a significantly "cleaner" environment to an extent that would justify the public expense necessary to provide such a level of service. Actually the reverse is true. Going to full secondary will increase our energy demand by 47% and significantly increase the amount of chemicals, sludge, land and staff associated with our operations, an interesting contradiction of other sections of the proposition. Cost Impact: $48,000,000 per year or greater than $1.4 billion over the next 30-years. SECTION 26: Water Quality Protection Section 13397 adopts the water quality criteria for toxic pollutants developed by the EPA pursuant to Section 304(a) of the federal Clean Water Act as state water quality standards except where the EPA approves a standard submitted by the State pursuant to Section 303 of the Clean Water Act, or where the State has adopted a more stringent standard. Section 13397.5 requires that by January 1, 1993, sediment quality objectives for toxic pollutants shall be adopted as water quality standards for the state's bay, estuarine and coastal waters. Those standards shall ensure the full protection (emphasis added) of public health and recreational values, and the full protection (emphasis added) and propagation of fish, shellfish and their habitat. Section 13397.6 (a) requires that the state board shall develop a statewide monitoring program to assess water and sediment quality and biological health of marine bay, estuarine, and coastal waters. Section 13397.6 (b) requires that each regional board shall develop specific plans for full protection (emphasis added) of public health and recreational values, and for the full protection (emphasis added) and propagation of fish, shellfish and their habitat in the state's marine bay, estuarine and ocean `r, 9 waters. Pull public participation by all affected persons and agencies shall be ensured. Section 13397.7 (a) requires that by June 1, 1992, unless earlier required by federal or state law, the regional boards and the (state) board shall establish total maximum daily loads, load allocations, and waste load allocations, as required by the federal Clean Water Act, for toxic pollutants which address all point and nonpoint industrial, municipal, agricultural, and other sources of discharge into any marine bay, estuarine or ocean waters. By 6/l/94, the regional boards shall implement such total maximum daily loads, load allocations, and waste load allocations, through the issuance or amendment or waste discharge requirements. The requirements shall include specific discharge limits sufficient to satisfy the load allocations and waste load allocations, and shall also include an adequate margin of safety that reflects any lack of knowledge about pollutant sources and attainment of water quality standards and policies. The regional board shall periodically revise such limits. Section 13397.7 (b) requires that if the water quality standards for any toxic pollutants are not met for any marine bay, estuarine, or ocean waters, and if the regional boards have not implemented the total daily maximum loads, load allocations, and waste load allocations within the required deadlines, then the regional boards shall be prohibited from issuing or amending any waste discharge requirement that increases the discharge of that pollutant into such water. Section 13397.8 requires that the state board shall require each coastal county to develop and submit, by January 1, 1994, for state board approval, a comprehensive stormwater management and control plan for existing and new �a✓ development. The plan shall include implementation, funding and enforcement components designed to minimise runoff to bay, estuarine and ocean waters. - Section 13398 requires that certain industrial firms shall submit a pollution prevention audit for review by the Regional Water Quality ControlBoard. Section 13398.5 requires that POTWs shall establish technical assistance programs to assist their industrial dischargers in the development of pollution prevention audits. STAFF ANALYSIS Many portions of this Section are redundant and unnecessary because the federal Clean Water Act and the California Ocean Plan already contain provisions that achieve the same environmental objectives. Districts' staff (and the staff of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board) believe that the time schedule for the state to adopt sediment quality objectives is very short for an area of regulation where there is insufficient background information and research to develop scientifically supportable limitations. 10 ..✓ The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) staff analysis of the time frame to establish waste load allocations for toxic pollutants concluded that \/ it "cannot be met". The technical assistance program for industrial dischargers required by this Section is presently underway, but to a lesser degree, by the Districts. The concept is a good one and so staff will evaluate it for further incorporation into our existing source control program. The SWRCB staff estimates that their annual costs will increase by $10 to $20 million dollars per year, and capital improvements for coastal dischargers are projected atseveral billions of dollars, far beyond the capacity of the State Revolving Fund. The requirement of full protection is contrary to the State's Porter-Cologne Clean Water Act which requires balancing economic and technical feasibility with all water quality objectives. If fish are to be fully protected in San Francisco Bay, does this imply, by way of example, that no water can be delivered from the Delta to Central and Southern California? In the view of many analysts, a strict reading of Proposition 128 would lead to this conclusion. Cost Impact: Unknown, but potentially in the millions, or billions statewide. SECTION 27; Marine Resources and Human Health Standards �f Section 427.10 requires that the State Department of Health Services take all necessary actions to identify threats to public health from contaminated fish and from waters that pose a public health threat to swimmers or beach users, and shall take all necessary steps to warn and protect the public from such threats to public health. Section 427.11 (a) mandates that by December 31, 1991, the Director (it is not clear who is meant by the word "Director") shall adopt, by regulation, based on clear and convincing evidence, health based standards for poisonous and deleterious substances, as defined in Section 26520, including, but not limited to (emphasis added), aldrin, dieldrin, benzine hexachloride, chlordane, DDT, endrin, heptachlor and heptachlor epoxide, PCBs, heavy metals, mercury, dioxins, copper, lead, zinc, toxaphene, and bacterial and viral contaminants, in fish and shellfish and other marine life used for food, in accordance with the standards specified for pesticides in Section 26906(b). If, however, the presence of pervasive, unavoidable environmental contaminants exceeds those standards, the consequences of the application of those standards on the availability of an adequate, wholesome, and economic marine food supply shall be considered, and those standards shall be modified accordingly; provided that, this exception shall be strictly construed to protect public health, while recognizing the uncontrollable nature of the presence of those contaminants. Section 427.12 (a) requires that by January 1, 1992, the Department, in cooperation with the State Water Resources Control Board, shall develop and 11 adopt safe statewide water quality standards for swimmers and beach users for marine bay, estuarine, and coastal waters utilizing both coliform bacterium and enterococci bacterium as indicators. In developing standards, the Department shall also consider the protection of children and the risks associated with viruses. Sections 427.12 (b) and (c) apply to posting of beaches and the requirements necessary to identify an area as chronically contaminated. STAFF ANALYSIS Everything in this Section is already available to the California Department of Health Services (DHS). Beach closures already occur when the IRS or a county health department determines that a public health threat exists. For several years, the DRS, in cooperation with the California Department of Fish and Game has notified sports fishermen about unsafe fisheries throughout the state. Bacterial standards for public bathing beaches and shell fishing have existed for over 50 years. Permanent posting of beaches because of chronic contamination has occurred whenever DRS or a county health department found it advisable to do so. Cost Impact: Unknown TITLE SIX SECTION 28. Creates the Office of Environmental Advocate. _ This is an elected office to be filled in the General Election of 1992 for an initial term of two years, and thereafter for a term of four years. The Office of the Environmental Advocate shall have all the proper powers of a Department of the executive branch. The Environmental Advocate shall advocate the proper implementation of Proposition 128 '(The Environmental Protection Act of 1990) and the full and complete enforcement of all the laws of the State of California relating to environmental protection and public health. (emphasis added) The California Council on Environmental Quality is created under this Section as part of the Office of Environmental Advocate. The council (6 members) shall be appointed by the Governor and serve without compensation (except for meeting stipends). The Council shall issue periodic reports on the state of the environment and shall evaluate the state's progress in meeting the goals of the Environmental Protection Act of 1990. The Council shall have several other purposes including, administering a competitive grants program for an applied R & D program to comply with Titles 4 & 5 of the Act and for methods of source reduction of toxic chemicals in the State. All public agencies in the State shall cooperate with the Advocate and provide information upon request necessary to carry out his or her duties. The Advocate is authorized to bring or intervene in any legal or other proceeding to ensure compliance with the Act or other laws enacted to protect the environment and public 12 �/ health. $40.000,000 is continuously appropriated from the General Fund. without regard to fiscal years, (emphasis added) to fund the grants programs specified in the Act. STAFF ANALYSIS California already has an effective (and sometimes overlapping, redundant and contradictory) regulatory system in place which protects all environmental media (air, land and water). California has led the nation and the world in all important environmental protection objectives. It is difficult for staff to identify any advantages of superimposing an Environmental Advocate and a California Council on Environmental Quality with authority in all environmental laws on this existing regulatory system. "Advocacy" is a dangerous word to be applied to a position with such unlimited discretion and wide-ranging duties. Current laws already establish responsibility and authority and this will confuse the issues of who, in fact, ultimate authority rests with. Cost Impact: Will depend on how the state raises the funding. TITLE SEVEN SECTION 29: Enforcement of the Environmental Protection Act of 1990 This Section deals with enforcement and legal action allowed to enforce the Act. 4/ Section 21180 (a) requires that any person, including any governmental agency, who has violated, is violating, or is threatening to violate any such provision of the Act may be enjoined, and a civil penalty may be imposed, in any court of competent jurisdiction. Section 21180 (b) requires that an action may be brought to the Attorney General in the name of the People of the State of California, or by any district attorney, or by any city attorney of a city or city and county having a population in excess of 750,000, or with the consent of the district attorney by any city attorney or city prosecutor. Section 21180 (c) requires that an action may be brought by any person acting in the public interest if: (1) the action is commenced more than 60 days after the person has given written notice of the violation which is the subject of the action to the Attorney General and the district attorney and any city attorney in whose jurisdiction the violation is alleged to occur, and to the alleged violator; and (2) none of such public officials has commenced and is diligently prosecuting the action against such violation. The limitations specified in this subsection do not a 1 to an action brought against a governmental aaencv or official. ampbasis added) Section 21180 (d) requires that if a public official undertakes a prosecution pursuant to the written notice described in 21180 (c)(1), before the noticing party brings an action under subdivision (c), the person who gave the notice O.r° 13 v shall be be permitted to intervene in the action on such terms as the court finds appropriate. _ Section 21180 (a) requires that the Legislature shall establish appropriate penalties, civil and criminal, for violations of the provisions of the Act for which a penalty is not specified. Section 21181 requires that all laws and regulations of the State designed to protect the food supply or environment, including this Act, shall be liberally construed (emphasis added) to achieve those purposes. STAFF ANALYSIS While Proposition 128 creates (in most cases) an entirely new set of rules and regulations dealing with several environmental issues, staff believes that there already exists sufficient statutory authority at the federal, state and local levels to prosecute polluters and enforce environmental regulations. Cost Impact: None, unless legal action is brought against the Districts as a result of this section. TITLE EIGHT Section 30. Defines the Governor's responsibility and makes the Governor accountable to the People of the State of California for the complete, timely and effective implementation of this Act. STAFF ANALYSIS None. TITLE NINE Section 31: Technical Matters. This Section requires that this Act shall be liberally construed and applied (emphasis added) in order to fully promote its underlying purposes, so that if more than one construction of a particular provision is possible, the one which more fully accomplishes the purposes of this Act shall be applicable. STAFF ANALYSIS None. „THE BOTTOM LINE" Because of the complexities, ambiguities and conflicting provisions of Proposition 128, it remains difficult to assess the full impact that this Act will have on the Districts, much less the State of California. However, given . the "worst-case" scenario implied by the several pertinent sections of the initiative, the possible annual cost to the Districts could be in excess of $50,000,000 per year. 14 FINAL TEXT �./ ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT OF 1990 INITIATIVE MEASURE TO BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO THE VOTERS The Attorney General of California has prepared the following title and summary of the chief purposes and points of the proposed measure: (Here set forth the title and summary prepared by the Attorney General. This title and summary must also be printed across the top of each page of the petition whereon signatures are to appear.) TO THE HONORABLE SECRETARY OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA We, the undersigned, registered, qualified voters of California, residents of County (or City and County) , hereby propose amendments to the Fish and Game, Food and Agricultural, Government, Health and Safety, Labor, Public Contract, Public Resources, and Water Codes relating to health and the environment, and petition the Secretary of State to submit the same to the voters of California for their adoption or rejection at the next succeeding general election or at any special statewide election held prior to the general election or otherwise provided by law. The proposed statutory amendments read as follows: \.r/ TITLE ONE SECTION 1. Short Title This Act shall be known as the Environmental Protection Act of 1990. TITLE TWO SECTION 2. Findings and Declarations We, the People of the State of California, do find and declare: A. Our health, natural environment and quality of life are threatened by chemical pollution of the food which nourishes us, the air we breathe and our ocean waters. B. These environmental problems arise from a common cause, our production of and dependence on toxic chemicals in all aspects of the economy. C. These prcblems are urgent issues requiring solutions, now. Our State and federal governments have failed to resolve .them, and have not adequately protected our health and environment. The public's trust has been compromised by special interests, and public confidence has been weakened by government's ,% / failure to act. It is therefore necessary to act by way of initiative to make the necessary changes in law. 1 k V We hereby further find and declare: 1) Each year, millions of pounds of pesticides are used in California, and eventually contaminate the food chain, drinking water supply, ocean, air, soil and ecosystem. Many of these pesticides pose clear hazards to human Life and health. 2) Our children are more vulnerable than adults to the toxic effects of pesticides because of their immature physiological systems and special susceptibility to cancer-causing substances. 3) Neither the state nor federal government has adequately protected the People of the State of California from hazardous pesticides, is the food chain, in the fields. and elsewhere in the environment, placing adults and especially children in serious jeopardy. As a result of this governmental failure, consumers and agricultural workers are exposed daily through work and food to hazardous pesticides. 4) The public health and environment will be best protected by the regulatory measures set forth in this Act, by conferring responsibility on the California Department of Health Services to control the use of pesticides, and by providing State funds for the development of safe alternatives while phasing out cancer causing and other hazardous pesticides. We also further find and declare: 1) As a result of California's rapid economic and population growth, the People of the State consume vast amounts of fossil fuels and other chemical `.✓ substances through transportation, heating and cooling, manufacturing, and in the production of electricity. That consumption creates tens of millions of tons of waste gases and pollutants every year, including carbon dioxide from combustion of fossil fuels, chloroflurpcarbous and halons from industry, and nitrous oxides from motor vehicles. 2) There is increasing and substantial scientific evidence that global temperatures are gradually being raised by the cumulative effect of the emissions of these gases released into the atmosphere by human and industrial activity. 3) In addition to the emissions of these gases, global warming is increased by the depletion of our forests and urban trees. Between 1977 and 1986 alone, California lost over 700,000 acres of its forests to agricultural use and urban expansion. - 4) California's old growth redwoods are an irreplaceable national and international resource, but exist only as a fragment of an ancient temperate rain forest ecosystem which once comprised approximately 2 million acres. Their continued destruction contributes to the loss of our forests and to global warming, and their cutting and harvesting, especially through clear cutting, contributes to erosion, pollution of water courses, and destruction of fishery and animal resources. Because of their extremely high biomass per acre, preservation of ancient redwood stands is significant in counteracting global warming, and provides an example of the actions that should be taken on a global scale. 2 b 5) There is also increasing and substantial scientific evidence that �J chemical substances are contributing to the destruction of the stratospheric ozone layer which shields the earth's surface from dangerous solar radiation. The continued destruction of the ozone layer could result in enormous increases in skin cancer cases, decreased yields of food crops, and adversely affect the health and welfare of the People of the State of California. 6) If these emissions continue unabated, and if the loss of trees in the State continues, global warming could have substantial adverse impacts on the State, including a reduction in water deliveries from the State Water Project to agricultural and urban areas, an expansion of San Francisco Bay caused by rising ocean levels, decreased crop yields due to higher temperatures and lower precipitation, increased temperatures, and increased energy usage to cool residences and workplaces. 7) As a result, the People of the State of California declare that the State must take the steps described in this Act to reduce toxic contamination of our air, to reduce its emission of waste gases which warm the atmosphere, to reduce and eliminate its use of chemicals which destroy the stratospheric ozone layer, and to protect and restore trees in the state. Finally, We find and declare: 1) Over one million barrels of oil are imported into California each day by oil tankers and from offshore oil platforms. In addition, current law permits oil development in state waters within three mules of the State's beaches and shores. 2) The transportation and unloading of this oil from oil tankers to shore facilities, and from offshore oil production platforms in both state and federal waters, seriously threatens the State's fishery resources, the marine food chain, coastline and beaches with oil pollution in the event of an oil spill. 3) The recent oil spill in Alaska demonstrates that current oil spill prevention practices and cleanup techniques are completely incapable of protecting the State's fishery resources, marine food chain, coastline and beaches in the event of a major oil spill. With current practices, the transportation of, and exploration and development for, oil cannot be conducted in a manner which adequately protects marine and coastal resources. 4) In addition, past muaicipal, industrial and agricultural discharges •into the State's bay, estuarine and ocean waters, discharges into waters that - flow into those waters, urban storm runoff, dredging activities, and past legal and illegal dumping of toxic wastes, have all had a serious adverse effect on the marine environment, ocean resources and water quality and therefore on public health and safety. 5) Toxic substances continue to pollute the ocean environment, fishery resources, and the marine food chain. 6) Therefore, the People of the State of California declare that the State must take the actions included is this Act, in order to protect the quality of our marine bay, estuarine and ocean waters. 3 w ; i Accordingly, We, the People of the State of California, do hereby enact the Environmental Protection Act of 1990, to safeguard the People from toxic contamination by chemical poisons in the food supply, to reduce y' chemical pollution which contributes to global warming and depletion of the ozone layer, to protect and increase the number of trees in the State thereby decreasing the production of chemicals and waste gases which contribute to global warming and depletion of the ozone layer, and to protect California's marine resources and coastline from oil spills and pollution by toxic chemicals. TITLE THREE SECTION 3. Chapter 9 is added to Division 21 of the Health and Safety Code, to read: Chapter 9. Food Safety and Pesticides I{ Article 1 26901. (a) The registration of any pesticide containing i. an active ingredient known to cause cancer or reproductive harm, which is registered for use on food or for which a tolerance exists as of the effective date of this Chapter, shall be cancelled and applicable tolerances revoked by January 1, 1996. 4 (b) The registration of any pesticide containing an active ingredient, registered for use on food, or for which a tolerance exists, which is determined after the effective date of this Chapter to cause (^ cancer or reproductive harm, shall be cancelled and applicable tolerances revoked an or before five years from the date of the determination. (c) No pesticide containing an active ingredient known to cause cancer or reproductive harm may be registered, or any tolerance adopted, for any new use on food after the effective date of this Chapter. (d) No pesticide for which the health effects studies required by Section 13123(c) of the Food and Agricultural Code are missing or inadequate shall be registered for any new use on food. 26902. (a) Nothwithstanding Section Z6901(a) and (b) , the Director of Health Services my, by regulation, extend the registration and tolerance of a i pesticide subject thereto for a period not to exceed three years, if the registrant demonstrates for each use of the pesticide for which an extension is sought: - - - (1) Cancellation of the pesticide will cause severe economic hardship to the state's agricultural industry; and (2) No known alternative pest control or management practice can be used effectively; and (3) The tolerance adopted meets the requirements of this Chapter, including Sections 26905 and 26906; and (4) The quantity of the pesticide used in this state has been reduced 4 by at least an average of IOZ per year over the five year period from base period use in this State. (b) A statement as to the basis upon which the proposed regulation is then predicated, and the record then available to the Director shall be made available when notice is issued pursuant to Government Code Section 11346.5. (c) During any extension authorized pursuant to subdivision (a) : (1) The pesticide shall be a restricted material, subject to Section 14006.5 of the road and Agricultural Cade; and (2) The Director shall restrict uses and revoke tolerances of the pesticide as necessary in order to reduce the quantity of the pesticide used each year by an average of an additional 1OZ per year over the extension period from the base period use in this state. Article 2 26903. (a) The registrant of any high hazard pesticide registered for use on food, or any person an whose behalf a tolerance has been established, may, before November 7, 1994, petition the Director pursuant to Government Code Section 11347 for a determination that the pesticide does not cause cancer. The registrant of any pesticide registered for use on food which is identified after the effective date of this Chanter as a high hazard pesticide, or any person on whose behalf a tolerance for such pesticide has been established, may petition the ➢irector within four years after the identification for a determination that the pesticide does not cause cancer. (b) Upon the filing of nay such petition, the Director shall determine, in accordance with the standards of this Chapter and based an complete and adequate scientific data, whether it has been demonstrated that the pesticide is not known to cause cancer. The criteria for this determination shall be those utilized for classification of a pesticide known to cause cancer as specified in Section 26914(1)(1) . (c) If the Director does not adapt a regulation granting a petition filed pursuant to subdivision (a) within one year after filing, or a petition has not been filed regarding a high hazard pesticide pursuant to subdivision (a) , the pesticide shall be known to cause cancer within the meaning of this Chapter, and shall be subject to Section 26901(b) if the pesticide is highly hazardous due to its active ingredient, or shall be subject to Section 26904(a) if the pesticide is highly hazardous because of its inert ingredient. (d) The Council on Environmental Quality, established by Government Code Section 12260, shall give priority to developing alternatives to the pesticides subject to Sections 26901 and this Section. 26904. (a) No pesticide containing an inert ingredient known to cause - cancer or reproductive harm =7 be registered,. nor may a tolerance be established, for a new use on food. Existing registrations for use an food of a pest cide containing an inert ingredient known to cause cancer or reproductive hares shall be cancelled and applicable tolerances revoked within two years of the effective date of this Chanter, or for those subsequently 5 determined to cause cancer or reproductive harm, within two years of such subsequent determination. (b) The Director shall not permit the use of any inert ingredient in the formulation of a pesticide registered for use on food unless the inert ingredient presents no significant risk. Article 3 26905. (a) For any pesticide registered for use on food, the Director shall evaluate the tolerance prescribed or exemption from tolerance, or any other standard permitting pesticide residues of the active ingredient in food, to determine whether the tolerance, ezemption or standard complies with the standards specified by this Chapter, including the standard specified by Section 26906. Such evaluations shall be completed: (1) for pesticides subject to Section 26901, by January 1, 1993; (2) for high hazard pesticides, by January 1, 1995; and (3) for all other pesticides, by January 1, 1997. If the data are insufficient for this determination, the Director shall require the registrant to submit additional data as deemed necessary by the Director, but in no case shall the dates herein be extended. - (b) If, pursuant to the evaluation, the Director determines that the pesticide residue fails to meet the requirements of Section 26906, the Director shall, within one year thereafter, revoke or revise the anolicable tolerance, exemption, or standard, by regulation, to meet such requirements. If the requirements of Section 26906 cannot be met within the time allowed in this Section, the Director shall establish a zero tolerance. (c) No pesticide shall be registered for a new use on food without the establishment of a tolerance in accordance with this Section or Section 26906. (d) Tolerances shall be established based on the total risk of the active ingredient contained in the pesticide, including its metabolites, contaminants and degradation products, but excluding inert ingredients. 26906. (a) A pesticide residue may be permitted in food only if it is demonstrated that the pesticide residue presents no significant risk to human health, including the health of identifiable population groups (particularly infants and children) with special food consumption patterns. The Director shall adopt appropriate tolerances for all pesticides used on food that meet this requirement. In getting tolerances, the Director shall give appropriate consideration to the other ways in which the consumer may be affected by the same pesticide or by related substances that are poisonous or deleterious. (b) For purposes of this Chapter, the term 'no significant risk' means: (1) for pesticides that are known carcinogens or highly hazardous, the level at which the residue will not cause or contribute to -a risk of human cancer in the exposed population which exceeds a rate of one in a million, utilizing the moat conservative risk assessment model that is generally accepted to be scientifically valid, and which .complies with the criteria of Section 12703(a) of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations. The standard specified in this subparagraph shall also apply to other adverse human health effects of any pesticide as to which there is no generally accepted scientifically valid threshold below which exposure is safe; and (2) 6 1 . for all pesticides not subject to subparagraph (1) , the level at which the pesticide residue will not cause or contribute to any known or potential adverse human health effects, including as ample margin of safety. A margin \../ of safety is not ample unless human exposure per unit of body measurement is at least 1000 times less than the no observable effect Level in animals or humans on which the pesticide residue was tested, except that the Director may determine that a lower margin of safety is ample. but in no event Lower than 100 times the no observable effect level, and only if there is complete and reliable exposure and toxicity data. 26907. No later than 30 days after the Director issues a proposed regulation revising a tolerance for a food use pesticide, the registrant or any person on whose behalf a tolerance has been established shall submit data to the Director and the Director of Food and Agriculture demonstrating the appropriate mazinm, application rates and preharvest intervals necessary to assure that no tolerance is exceeded, and that no worker will suffer impairment of health or functional capacity within the meaning of Section.26950. 26908, The Director shall not grant any new tolerance, and shall not continue, revise or renew an existing tolerance beyond January 1, 1997, unless the registrant, or a person on whose behalf a tolerance has been established, demonstrates that there are practical analytical methods available to monitor the residues of pesticide in food, which methods can reliably, routinely, and efficiently quantify the level of the residue with sensitivity sufficient to enforce all applicable tolerances. 26909. The burden of proof shall, at all times, be on the registrant or the person an whose behalf a tolerance has been established to demonstrate that use of a pesticide conforms to the requirements of Title Three of the Environmental Protection Act of 1990. 26910. In order to protect the health of the People of the State of California, food produced outside of this state, foreign or domestic, which contains a residue of a pesticide which has been cancelled or cannot be registered in this state because of Sections 26901 or 26903, or which is in excess of the amount permitted by Sections 26905 and 26906, is adulterated and unsafe. Article 4 26911. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, effective July 1. 1991, all of the following functions, authority, and responsibilities are transferred from the Department of Food and Agriculture to the Department of Health Services: (1) Evaluation of the health risks of pesticide exposure in food, air, water, the workplace and the environment; (2) Establishment and implementation of specific criteria to evaluate the health risks of pesticides and environmental contaminants and of programs to require that tests be conducted by registrants of pesticides tc determine health risks; (3) Review and evaluation of the validity, adequacy, and completeness 7 of pesticide test data; (4) Development and setting of pesticide residue tolerances and -- permissible amounts of environmental contaminants; (5) Development and setting of workplace health standards; and (6) Any other authority necessary to protect public health and the environment from the hazards of pesticides. (b) The Governor shall take all steps necessary to effectuate the transfer of authority required by subdivision (a) , including the transfer of all records, equipment, supplies, personnel positions and funding related to such functions, and if necessary, the submission of a reorganization plan pursuant to Government Cade Section 12080.2. 26912. (a) If the Director determines that a pesticide poses a threat of adverse human health effects, the Director may, by regulation, prohibit or restrict the distribution, sale, or use of the pesticide as necessary. (b) Nothwithstanding any other provision of Law, the Director of Food and Agriculture may not register, reregister, or otherwise permit the use of any pesticide inconsistent with a regulation adopted by the Director of Health Services pursuant to this Chapter, and no person may distribute, sell or use a pesticide in this state in violation of a regulation adopted by the Director of Health Services pursuant to this Chapter. 26913. (a) Notwithstanding Sections 26901 and 26903, a pesticide _ may be used in an eradication effort undertaken during a state of emergency declared pursuant to Section 8558 of the Government Code and subject to Chanter 1.5 of Division 4 of the Food and Agricultural Code, if there is no other alternative means of eradication, if the Director concurs in the necessity and safety of the use of the pesticide, and if the use complies with any restrictions deemed necessary by the Director. (b) Notwithstanding Sections 26901 and 26903. a pesticide may be used to control Africanized bees, mosquitoes, or other human or animal disease vectors pursuant to Chapter 5 of Division 3 or Section 402. Article 5 26914. The definitions in this section govern the construction of Title 3 of the Environmental Protection Act of 1990, and Chapter 1 of Division 7 of the Food and Agricultural Code: (a) -Active ingredient' means a pesticide, excluding its inert - ingredients, but including its metabolites, contaminants, and degradation product. (b) "Adverse human health effect" means illness resulting in premature death or severe debilitation. (c) 'Base period use" means the lesser amount reported sold in 1989 or used in 1990. 1 - V.r 8 (d) *Cause or contribute' means the extent to Which the pesticide adversely affects human health. (a) -Classification- by the United States Environmental Protection , Agency means inclusion on a list, report, or memorandum, or identified in a Final document, which is used as a basis for regulatory action, and including, but not limited to, publication in the Federal Register or otherwise made known to the public by any means. (£) •Contaminant' means a constituent of a registered pesticide which is-unavoidably produced during the manufacture of the active ingredient. (g) -Degradation product- ==a the result of the biotransformation or breakdown of the parent compound by food processing or environmental factors including but not limited to air, sunlight or water. (h) -Demonstrate- means to meet the burden of proof or establish by clear and convincing evidence. (i) -Food- is defined by Section 26012. (j) -High hazard pesticide- means any pesticide containing an active or inert ingredient which is (1) classified by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as a Group C carcinogen pursuant to the guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment published is 51 Federal Register 33992, or a comparable classification based on equivalent criteria under any successor guidelines, including, at a m,^+^^an, each pesticide identified as a Group C carcinogen listed in 53 Federal Register 41118; or (2) determined by the �../ Director to create such risk, utilizing the same or similar criteria. (k) 'Inert ingredient- means an ingredient that is not active, as defined in Section 2(m) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act and including any contaminant therein or any substance which is the result of metabolism or other degradation of the inert ingredient. (1) "Known to cause cancer* means (1) classification by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as a Group A or Group B carcinogen pursuant to the guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment published in 51 Federal Register 33992, or a comparable classification based on equivalent criteria under any successor guidelines, and including at a minfmim each pesticide identified as a Group A or Group B carcinogen and listed in 53 Federal Register 41118; or (2) Listing of a chemical by the Governor as )mown to the state to cause cancer pursuant to Section 25249.8; or (3) a ' determination by the Director utilizing the same or similar criteria as _ used is subparagraphs (1) and (2). (m) 'Known to cause reproductive harm• means a listing of a chemical by the Governor as known to cause reproductive toxicity pursuant to Section 25249.8. (a) •Metabolite• means the result of,hiotransformation or breakdown of the parent compound by a Living organism. (0) "No observable effect Level' is the level of exposure which reliable experimental data derived from exposing humans or animals shows 9 that a pesticide induces no adverse effect. (p) 'Pesticide' or 'pesticide chemical' means any substance which alone, in chemical combination, or in formulation with one or more substances, is an 'economic poison' as defined by Section 12753 of the Food and Agricultural Code or a pesticide as defined in Section 2(u) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticids Act, but including the active ingredient, metabolites, contaminants, degradation product, or inert ingredient, and which is used in the production, storage, or transportation of any food. (q) 'Processed food' means any food other than a raw agricultural commodity, and includes any raw agricultural commodity which has been subject to processing, including canning, cooking, freezing, dehydration, or milling. (r) 'Produce' means any food in its raw or natural state which is in such form as to indicate that it is intended for consumer use with or without any or further processing. (s) 'Raw agricultural commodity' is defined by Section 26029. (t) 'Residue' means a residue of any pesticide in any, food or any other substance that is present in, or results from, metabolism or other degradation process of the pesticide. (u) 'Toxicity category' means a category established pursuant to Part 162.10(h) (1) of Title 40 of the Cade of Federal Regulations. 26915. Nothing in Title Three of the Environmental Protection Act of 1990 shall be construed to remove or diminish the obligations of any person under Chanter 6.6 of Division 20 with regard to any substance to which Title Three applies. Article 6 26916. (a) No person shall advertise, make any representation or sell any raw agricultural commodity with a representation that the commodity is certified as having 'no detected pesticide residue' or any other similar claim, unless all of the following requirements are met: (1) Documentation providing full disclosure of all pesticides used during any phase of production is submitted to the Department of Health . Services and provided with the product to retail sellers; (2) Laboratory tests for all pesticides used, and commonly used, an the commodity have been conducted for each field lot by a laboratory accredited for such tests by the Department of Health Services, with results of such tests submitted to the Department prior to retail sale; (3) No pesticide known to cause cancer or reproductive harm, no high hazard pesticide, and no pesticide for which there is no practical analytical method of detection, has been used during any phase of production of the commodity; and (4) Any residue does not exceed practical detection limits as �J 10 determined by the Department or exceed 50 parts per billion, whichever is lower. (b) the requirements of this Section apply only to raw agricultural , commodities advertised, represented, or sold with a representation that the commodity is certified as having -no detected pesticide residue- or other similar claim, and shall not apply to organic and other agricultural commodities defined by Section 26569.11. (c) This Section shall be effective only until November 7, 1998. SECTION 4. Sections 13127.1 and 13150.1 are added to the Food and Agricultural Code, to read: 13127.1. 'As soon as possible,' as used in Section 13127(d)(1) means no later than February 13, 1991. 13150.1. The director may allow the continued registration. sale, and use of an economic poison which meets any one of the conditions specified in Section 13149, only if the Director of Health Services concurs with the findings of the subcommittee and the director pursuant to Section 13150 (c) and (d) . SECTION 5. Section 21080.6 of the Public Resources Code is added, to read: 21080.6 Except as to pesticide use permits, the certification of the pesticide regulatory program pursuant to Section 21080.5 shall expire an July 1, 1992. The Secretary shall not recertify the program unless, in determining whether the program meets the criteria for certification under Section 21080.3, the Secretary determines that the public reports issued by the Departments of Food and Agriculture and Health Services to implement the program satisfy the criteria of Section 21080.5. Public reports issued in making pesticide registration, renewal, and reevaluation decisions shall contain a sufficient explanation and analysis of any significant adverse environmental effects, why any effects are determined not to be significant, and mitigation measures and alternatives, in order to provide sufficient information to the public and department to make an informed decision. Adverse environmental effects discussed shall include the impact on health of humans, plants and animals, and contamination of air, soil, and water. SECTION 6. Chapter 10 is added to Division 21 of the Health and - Safety Code, to read: Chapter 10. Agricultural Worker Safety 26950. The Director shall develop and implement a worker protection program to prevent or reduce exposure to pesticides to the lowest achievable levels necessary to ensure that no exposed worker will suffer impairment of health or functional capacity, assuming lifetime occupational exposure at such levels. Any standard of general applicability shall be adopted by `..r� regulation. 11 26951. The Director shall require registrants to submit all data necessary to perform his or her duties, including California use condition data, and shall have access to all applicable data. including pesticide use records maintained by the Department of Food and Agriculture or county agricultural . commissioners. 26952. No pesticide may be registered, or reregistered, by the Director of Food and Agriculture, unless the Director of Health Services has determined that the pesticide complies with Title Three of the Environmental Protection Act of 1990. Z6953. (a) Article 1 (commencing with Section 6700) of Group 3 of Subchapter 3 of Chapter 6 of Title 3 of the California Code of Regulations shall be deemed adopted as standards by the Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board. The Board shall revise such standards by January 1, 1992, to conform to the requirements of this Chapter. (b) The Standards Board, based on recommendations from the Director, shall adopt regulations which, supported by clear and convincing evidence, shall: (1) For each crop in this State, prescribe quarantine periods, after pesticide applications to a worksite, during which the entry of workers is prohibited, which periods will prevent the impairment of health or functional capacity of workers; (2) Require posting of written notices that warn persons to avoid . entering pesticide treated areas during such periods, which warnings shall ' be in addition to any other warnings required by law; (3) Require county agricultural commissioners to retain all pesticide use records for a period of time sufficient to evaluate chronic health effects of exposure; and (4) Protect the health and functional capacity of workers and prevent or reduce exposure, as provided in Section 26950. (c) After January 1, 1992, unless a registrant demonstrates that a shorter quarantine period is safe, the m ^ period for Toxicity Category I is 72 hours; for Category II, 48 hours; for Category III, 24 hours: and for pesticides subject to Sections 26901 or 26903, 7 days, or other generic quarantine periods that the Board, by regulation, determines, based an clear and convincing evidence and the recommendations of the Director, will fulfill the purposes of Section 26950. 26934. The Department shall, as lead agency, and with the assistance of the Departments of Industrial Relations and Food and Agriculture, develop a program to ensure the investigation and abatement of any condition where a health hazard from pesticides exists. Investigation and abatement of individual incidents shall be directly supervised by the Department when the Director determines that such sucervision is warranted. SECTION 7. Sections 50.8, 144.7, 144.8, 6393.1 and 6382.1 are added to the Labor Code, to read: 12 50.8. Chapter 6.6 of Division 20 of the Health and Safety Code, is a provision of state law governing occupational safety and health within the meaning of Section 50.7(a) , and the pertinent parts of such Chapter, including Sections 25192 and 25249.7, shall be promptly incorporated into the State Plan. 144.7. The Board shall, by January, 1,. 1992, adopt regulations -providing agricultural workers with rights at least as protective as the rights provided to other workers pursuant to Chapter 2.5, of Part 1 of Division 5. Such regulations shall include all registered pesticides as hazardous substances within the meaning of Section 6382 and shall permit workers, their physicians and representatives appropriate access to material safety data sheets prepared pursuant to Section 6390, and to pesticide use records. 144.8. Nothing in this Code, is the Health and Safety Code, or in the Food and Agricultural Code, shall be construed to limit the authority of the Board to adopt, and the Division to enforce, pesticide safety standards in agricultural employment in this state. 6382.1 -Substances- as used in Section 638Z(b) (4) includes all pesticides registered in this state. 6393.1 The term 'if the product is labeled pursuant to the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Bodenticide Act, as amended, ' as used in Sections 6393 and 6397(c) , shall not be interpreted to relieve any person, otherwise subject thereto, from the duty to provide an MSDS to a specific purchaser of a pesticide registered in this state. SECTION 8. Health and Safety Code Sections 26205, 26Z06, 26801, and 26802 are repealed. SECTION 9. Labor Code Section 6399.1 is repealed. SECTION 10. Food and Agricultural Code Sections 12501, 12502, 12503, 12504, 12505, 12561, 12562. 12563, 1Z555, 12582, 12608.5, 12671, 12980. 12981. 12982, 12985, 12986, 12998, and 13000 are repealed. SECTION 11. Sections 25249.71, 25Z49.81, 26205 and 26801 are added to the Health and Safety Code, to read: - 25249.71. Any person who has given notice in accordance with Section 25249.7(d) shall be permitted to intervene in any action brought pursuant to Section 25249.7 by the Attorney General, a district attorney, or a city attorney, on such terms as the court finds appropriate. 25249.81. The state's qualified experts identified and consulted pursuant to Section 25249.8(b) and (d) shall be subject to Chanter 7 of Title 9 of the Government Code. 26205. All pesticide and food additive regulations and any amendments adopted thereto pursuant to the federal act, the Health and Safety Code or the 13 Food and Agricultural Code, which are in effect on November 7, 1990, are the pesticide and food additive regulations in this state unless they are established, revised or revoked pursuant to Sections Z6901, 26905 or Z6906. The Department may, by regulation, prescribe conditions under which a food �as� additive may be used in this state, whether or not such conditions are in accordance with the regulations adopted pursuant to the federal act. 26801. Any person who violates any provision of this Division or any regulation adopted pursuant to this Division shall be subject to the terms of imprisonment and fines provided by Section 12996 of the Food and Agricultural Code, or to a civil penalty in the amount and subject to the procedures set forth in Section 12998 of the Food and Agricultural Code. SECTION 12. Sections 12533.5. 12536, 12616, and 12998 are added to the Food and Agricultural Code, to read: 12535.5. The director shall maintain programs to monitor raw agricultural commodities for pesticide residues and other contaminants, using pesticide use and other data, and shall enforce tolerances and other standards for raw agricultural commodities. Monitoring shall emphasize pesticides which pose the greatest health risks, including those which are subject to Sections 26901 and 26903 of the Health and Safety Code, and which pose greater risks to children and infants and other sensitive population subgroups. The director shall also give emphasis to monitoring food imported into California and shall, at least annually, report the results of the programs to the Legislature. 12536. The director shall establish and implement a collection program under which, upon request of an agricultural pesticide user and without cost to the user, the Department shall collect and safely dispose, or arrange for collection and safe disposal, of any pesticide subject to Section 26901 of the Health and Safety Code. 12616. The provisions of this Chapter that apply to produce found to contain pesticide residues or other deleterious ingredients in excess of any maximum quantity or permissible tolerance established pursuant to this Chapter shall also apply to any processed food found to contain pesticide residues or other deleterious ingredients in excess of any maximum quantity or permissible tolerance, and shall also apply to any pesticide residue or other deleterious ingredient in excess of any maximum quantity or tolerances • established pursuant to the Health and Safety Code, including Sections _ 26905 and 26906. However. Section 26901 shall not apply to food that was -processed prior to November 7, 1990, or to food which bears a residue of any pesticides subsequently determined to be subject to Section 26901. by -operation of Section 26903, that was processed before that subsequent - determination. In addition, food processed prior to the revision of any tolerance pursuant to Section Z6905 shall not be deemed adulterated. 12998. (a) Any person who violates any provision of this Division. or any regulation adopted pursuant to this Division relating to pesticides, shall be liable for a civil penalty, without regard to intent or negligence, not to exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000) , 'or for intentional, negligent ^ or repeated violations, not to exceed twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) , for each separate violation, or, for continuing violations, for each day that 14 the violation continues. (b) Liability under this Section may be imposed in a civil action or in an administrative proceeding governed by the procedures set forth in Health and Safety Code section Z5189.3 or any other provision of law. (c) Any action brought pursuant to this Division relating to pesticides shall be commenced within three years of the occurrence of the violation or discovery of the facts constituting the grounds for commencing the action. SECTION 13. Sections 2605Z and 25504 of the Health and Safety Code are amended, to read: 26052. The provisions of this division shall be so construed as to not be in conflict with: (1) the provisions of Title 3 of the Environmental Protection Act of 1990 or the Food and Agricultural Code aE-ahia-ecaaar and the rules and regulations adooted pursuant thereto, but if there is an actual or apparent conflict. Title 3 of the Environmental Protection Act of 1990 shall prevail: oq (2) with the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, Division 9 (commencing with Section 23000) of the Business and Professions Code, and the rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. 26504. Any added poisonous or deleterious substance, or any food additive, pesticide chemical, active ingredient as defined in Section 26914(a) , preservative, or color additive, shall be considered unsafe for use with respect to any food, as defined in Section 26914(1) . and such food is `�►' therefore adulterated, unless there is in effect a regulation adopted pursuant to Sections 26205,-26296,06-26207, 26905 or 26906 which limits the quantity and the use, or intended use, of such substance to the terms prescribed by such regulation. and the quantity of residue is within the limits of that regulation. TITLE FOUR SECTION 14. Part 7 is added to Division 26 of the Health 6 Safety Code, to read: , PART 7. GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION PLAN 44390. By January 1, 1993, the Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission shall adopt and implement a plan to reduce annual emissions of any gases which may contribute, directly or indirectly, to global warming. The plan shall provide for the maximum feasible net effective reduction in the global warming potential of these gases. The plan shall also require a net reduction in carbon dioxide emissions of twenty percent (20Z) by January 1, 2000, measured from 1988 levels, and forty percent (402) by January 1, 2010. These percentages shall be adjusted, if necessary, by a correction factor which reflects any difference between the projected rate of population growth in California, and the projected rate for the United States. For purposes of this Part, -net effective reduction in global warming potential' means a reduction, based on the best evidence available, of 15 those air contaminants which contribute directly or indirectly to atmospheric warming, including but not limited to carbon dioxide, chlorofluorocarbons. halons, nitrous oxide and methane, weighted to reflect their respective contributions to global warming. Carbon dioxide emitted from the generation of electricity which is consumed within California shall be considered a part of Cali£oroia's emissions, regardless of where the electricity is generated. 44391. (a) The provisions of the plan specified by Section 44390 related to energy conservation and development and electrical power generation shall be prepared and implemented by the Commission. In preparing and implementing those provisions, the Commission shall consult with affected Districts to ensure that those provisions will not interfere with the attainment or maintenance of state or federal ambient air quality standards. (b) The provisions of the plan related to emissions from vehicular sources and motor vehicle fuels shall be prepared and implemented by the Air . Resources Board. That Board shall also prepare and implement provisions relating to any greenhouse gas emissions not specified by subdivision (a) or (c). (c) The provisions of the plan related to stationary sources, indirect sources, area wide sources and transportation system use in a particular district may be prepared by the air pollution control district or air quality management district, at the district's option. If prepared by a district, the provisions shall be submitted to the Board which shall, after public hearing, approve or revise the submission. Districts shall adopt regulations to implement the measures in the plan relating to emissions from stationary sources, indirect sources, area wide sources and transportation system use, provided that districts may adopt and enforce regulations more effective in reducing emissions than measures contained in the plan. (d) The plan provisions prepared by the Board and any district shall be submitted to the Commission by June 30, 1992. 44392. all state and local agencies shall adopt any necessary regulations to implement the plan prepared and adopted pursuant to Section 44390, and shall not take any action inconsistent with that Plan. SECTION 15. Part 8 is added to Division 26 of the. Health and Safety Code, to read: PART 8. STRATOSPHERIC OZONE LATER PROTECTION 44450. For purposes of this Part: (a) 'Group I chemical' means chlorofluorocarbon-11, chlarofluorocarbou-12, chlorofluorocarbon-113, chlorafluarocarbon-114, chlarofluorocarban-115, halos-1211, halon-1301, halos-2402, carbon tetrachloride, methyl chloroform, and any mixture containing one or more such chemical. (b) 'Group II chemical' means any hydrochlorofluoroca:'on (ECFC) and any other chemical determined by the air Resources Board to have the potential to deplete stratospheric ozone, and any mixture containing one 16 or more such chemical. 44451. (a) No later than January 1, 1993: (1) The maximum feasible recovery and recycling of Group I chemicals shall be conducted during the servicing or disposal of any air conditioning and refrigeration systems and appliances, including vehicular air conditioners, and during the disposal of building and appliance insulation; (2) Any person shall be prohibited from manufacturing, selling, or offering for sale or use any Group I chemical in a container which contains less than 15 pounds of such chemical (except for specific pharmaceutical applications and fire extinguishing applications for which the Hoard, after a public hearing, has determined there is no commercially available adequate alternative) ; (3) Any person shall be prohibited from manufacturing, selling, or offering for sale or use any packaging material which contains or was manufactured with a Group I chemical; and (4) The Hoard shall adopt regulations to ensure that any substitute or replacement for a Group I chemical does not endanger human health. (b) Any person who uses a Group I chemical as a foam blowing agent, as a solvent for industrial cleaning, defluxing, or degreasing, or for any other industrial manufacturing purpose, shall reduce the atmospheric emissions of such chemical, by January 1, 1993, by at least ninety (90) percent from the amount emitted by such person in 1988. (c) No later than January 1, 1995: (1) Any person shall he prohibited from manufacturing, selling, or offering for sale or use any new motor vehicle, as defined in Sections 39042 and 43155, whether passenger or commercial, if such vehicle contains a vehicular air conditioner which uses a Group I chemical; and (2) Any person shall be prohibited from manufacturing, selling, or offering for sale or use any insulating material, rigid foam material, or soft foam product containing a Group I chemical. (d) No later than December 31, 1996, any person shall be prohibited from manufacturing, selling, or offering for sale or use any Group I chemical . or any product containing, assembled or manufactured with such chemical, and from using any such chemical in any manufacturing, assembly, or packaging process. 44452. (a) Any person shall be prohibited from producing, assembling, packaging, selling, or offering for sale or use nay aerosol product (other than a pharmaceutical product) containing a Group II chemical by January 1, 1992 or any foam product (other than insulating materials) containing or manufactured with a Group I1 chemical by January 1, 1994. (b) Group II chemicals shall be subject to all of the requirements of Section 44451(a)(1) . ♦../ (c) Any person shall be prohibited from manufacturing, selling, or 17 offering for sale or use any Group II chemical or product containing, assembled or manufactured with such chemical, and from using any such chemical in any _ . manufacturing, assembly, or packaging process after January 1, 2020. 44453. (a) Sections 44431 and 44452 shall not be construed to prohibit the continued use or resale of an individual article which contains a Group I or Group II chemical if such product was manufactured, sold or offered for sale or use before any applicable deadline therein. (b) Section 44451 shall not be construed to prohibit the maintenance or service of any product with a Group I chemical, provided that after January 1, 1997, only recovered and recycled Group I chemicals are used for such purposes. (c) The Air Resources Board shall adapt regulations as necessary to implement the requirements of this Part, including any additional measures, such as intermediate deadlines, necessary to achieve the purposes of Section 44452(c) . (d) The Board shall adopt regulations under which any person may petition, no later than one year prior to the applicable deadline, for an extension of a deadline established under Sections 44451 or 44452. The Board may grant, by regulation, up to three extensions of not more than two years each, provided the petitioner has demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that: (1) The petitioner has thoroughly and fairly considered all alternative chemicals, products, or processes that potentially would achieve compliance with the applicable deadline, or which would result in a lower Level of ozone depletion; (2) No such alternative is available for the petitioner's particular application; (3) If the deadline is extended, the petitioner will implement all commercially available means to prevent the emission of Group I or Group II chemicals to the atmosphere; and (4) The extension is necessary to avoid substantial and widespread economic and social hardships to the general public. (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision (d) , the Board may grant an extension or extensions of an applicable deadline as necessary for basic research purposes or for medical purposes. 44454. By regulation, the Board shall alter any deadline established pursuant to Sections 44451 or 44452, in order to establish an earlier deadline, if it finds that feasible and commercially practicable alternatives to specific uses of Group I or Group II chemicals are earlier available. 44453. (a) By January 1, 1993, the Bureau of Automotive Repair shall establish and administer a program mandating the installation and proper use of approved refrigerant recycling equipment by -any person who services vehicular air conditioners, and enforcing the use of that equipment. (b) As used in this Section and in Section 44451: is (1) 'Approved refrigerant recycling equipment' means equipment that is approved by the Air Resources Board, in consultation with the Bureau of Automotive Repair which will minimize the amount of Group I chemicals released to the atmosphere; and , (2) 'Vehicular air conditioner' means mechanical vapor compression refrigeration equipment used to cool the driver's or passenger compartment of any motor vehicle, or the refrigerated compartment of a commercial vehicle. 44456. Nothing in Part 7 or Part 8 of Division 26 shall be construed to remove or diminish the obligations of any person under Chapter 6.6 of Division 20 with regard to any substance to which Part 7 or Part 8 applies. SECTION 16. Article 10.8 is added to Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Gave rnmeat Code, to read: ARTICLE 10.8. COM(RCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL TREE PLANTING 65592. (a) By December 1, 1991, the Resources Agency shall adopt regulations requiring that any person who constructs a project plant one tree for each five hundred (500) square feet of such project. (b) Such regulations shall provide for appropriate tree selection that maximizes air quality benefits (including absorption of gases that may contribute directly or indirectly to atmospheric warping) , energy conservation, and appropriate long term maintenance of the trees planted. (a) The regulations shall also provide that tree planting shall be done, in the following order of priority: (1) On the site of the project; (Z) On private property, or along public streets, vithia five miles of the site of the new development; or (3) On public or private land, or along public streets, within the same geographical area. (d) The regulations shall further establish procedures for payment of an appropriate fee to a locally designated agency, or other agency determined by the Resources Agency, in lieu of planting and maintenance, to be used solely for the planting and maintenance of trees. (e) The regulations shall exempt any project of less than five hundred (500) square feet of construction, and any project which involves remodeling or replacement of a single family home, from the requirements of this Section. SECTION 17. Chanters 5.- 6 and 7 are added to Part 2.5 of Division 4 of the Public Resources Code, to read: Chapter 5 ♦ / Article 1 19 4801. As used is Chapters 5, 6 and 7 of this Part, 'stand of ancient redwood- means means a forested area containing at least six trees per acre of the � species Sequoia sempervireas greater than 32 inches diameter at breast height or greater than 175 years old. Article 2 4802. The Ancient Redwood Forest and Reforestation Fund is hereby created. 4803. (a) Notwithstanding Section 13340 of the Government Code, all money deposited in the Ancient Redwood Forest and Reforestation Fund is hereby continuously appropriated to the Wildlife Conservation Board, without regard to fiscal years, for (1) acquisition of stands of ancient redwood: (2) for grants to itself and to other public agencies, public land trusts or nonprofit organizations, for urban forestry projects, as defined by Section 4799.09, and for their maintenance, or to establish, rehabilitate, maintain or restore forest lands by reforestation, or for public planting or maintenance or other appropriate rural forest resource improvement projects; and (3) for associated administrative costs of the Board or other agency in carrying out these programs. The Secretary of the Resources Agency may select a Department within the Resources Agency, other than the Wildlife Conservation Board, to administer the program established by subparagraph (2) . (b) No later than August 15, 1991, the Wildlife Conservation Board shall establish, after public hearing, a priority list of stands of ancient redwood which should be acquired by the State of California. In establishing that list, the Board shall consider, but not be limited to, whether the possible acquisition is threatened by lagging, would preserve an undisturbed stand of ancient redwood, provide a representative example of the coastal redwood forest which previously existed, provide critical habitat to plants and animals, provide opportunities for public access, and whether it could be effectively managed to preserve its values. The Board shall give highest priority to acquisition of the largest remaining stands of ancient redwood (measured alone or in conjunction with other contiguous acquisitions) never previously subject to timber harvesting. As promptly as feasible after the establishment of the priority list, but no later than November 7, 1991, the Board shall begin acquisition of the stands of ancient redwood, with an aggregate market value of two hundred million dollars ($200,000,000) , by entering into binding agreements for purchase or by initiating condemnation proceedings. Upon acquisition, the stands shall be managed in perpetuity to preserve their integrity and value as ancient redwood forest, free from logging, and the Secretary of the Resources Agency may designated such stands as ecological preserves within the meaning of Section 1580 of the Fish and Game Code, notwithstanding the provisions of Section 1582. (c) Where the owner of a stand of ancient redwood designated for acquisitdon is unwilling to sell voluntarily, the Board shall utilize the eminent domain authority of the State of California to accuire the property by eminent domain. In any case where the stand of ancient redwood designated for acquisition is threatened by logging. and where the owner is unwilling to sell voluntarily, the Board shall utilize the procedures far possession prior 20 to judgment specified in Article 3 of Chapter 6 of Title 7 of Part 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure. (d) In exercising such authority, the Board shall consider alternatives to acquisition in fee, including easements, development rights, life estates, leases and leaseback arrangements, to the extent that they may result in acquisition of a greater amount of ancient redwood, but in all cases the stand of ancient redwood shall be preserved and shall not be subject to timber harvesting. Reference in Chapter 5 or Chapter 6 to the acquisition of stands of ancient redwood means acquisition of fee simple title or of lesser interests under this subsection. Chapter 6 4804. Bonds in the total amount of three hundred million dollars ($300,000,000), exclusive of refunding bonds, or so much thereof as is necessary, may be issued and sold to be used for carrying out the purposes expressed in Section 4803 and to be used to reimburse the General Obligation Bond Expense Revolving Fund pursuant to Section 16724.5 of the Government Code. The bonds, when sold, shall be and constitute a valid and binding obligation of the State of California, and the full faith and credit of the State of California is hereby pledged for the punctual payment of both principal and interest as they become due and payable. 4805. The proceeds of bonds and notes issued and sold pursuant to this Chapter shall be deposited in the Ancient Redwood Forest and Reforestation Fund created by Section 4802. Two hundred million dollars ($200,000,000) shall be allocated for the purposes of acquiring stands of ancient redwood, and one hundred million dollars ($100,000,000) shall be allocated for the remaining purposes specified by section 4803. 4806. The bonds authorized by this Chapter shall be prepared, executed, issued, sold, paid, and redeemed as provided in the State General Obligation Bond Law (Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 167201 of Part 3 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code) , and all provisions of that law shall apply to the bonds and are hereby incorporated in this Chapter as though set forth in full in this Chapter. 4807. (a) Solely for the purpose of authorizing the issuance and sale, pursuant to the State General Obligation Bond Law, of the bonds authorized by this Chapter, the Ancient Redwood Forest and Reforestation Finance Committee is hereby created, and for purposes of this Chapter is 'the committee' as that term is used in the State General Obligation Bond Law. The committee shall consist of the Controller, the Director of Finance, and the Treasurer, or their designated representatives. The Treasurer shall serve as chairperson of the committee. A majority of the committee may act for the committee. (b) For purposes of this Chapter and the State General Obligation Bond Law, the 'Wildlife Conservation Board is hereby designated as 'the board.' 4808. The committee shall act as expeditiously as is consistent with generally accepted principles of fiscal prudence to enable the board to carry out the purposes of Chapter 5. In so doing, the committee shall determine when it is necessary or desirable to issue bonds authorized pursuant to this Chapter in order to carry out the purposes of Chapter 5, and the amount of 21 bonds to be issued and sold. Successive issues of bonds may be authorized and _ sold to carry out those purposes progressively, and it is not necessary that all of the bonds authorized to be issued be sold at any one time. 4809. There shall be collected annually in the same manner and at the same time as other state revenue is collected, in addition to the ordinary revenues of the state, a sum in an amount required to pay the principal of, and interest on, the bands each year. It is the duty of all officers charged by law with any duty in regard to the collection of the revenue to do and perform each and every act which is necessary to collect that additional sum. 4810. Notwithstanding Section 13340 of the Government Code, there is hereby appropriated from the General Fund, for the purposes of Chapter 5, an amount that will equal the total of the following: (a) The sum annually necessary to pay the principal of, and interest on, bonds issued and sold pursuant to this Chapter, as the principal and interest become due and payable. (b) The sum which is necessary to carry out Section 4809, appropriated without regard to fiscal years. 4811. For the purpose of carrying out Chapter 5, the Director of Finance may authorize the withdrawal from the General Fund of an amount or amounts not to exceed the smart of unsold bonds which have been authorized by the committee to be sold for the purposes of carrying out those provisions. Any amounts withdrawn shall be deposited in the. fund created by Section 4802. Any money made available under this section shall be returned to the General Fond from money received from the sale of bonds which would otherwise be deposited in the fund created by Section 4802. 4812. The board may request the Pooled Money Investment Board to make a loan from the Pooled Money Investment Account in the General Fund, in accordance with Section 16312 of the Gave rnmant Code, to carry out Chapter 5. The amount of the loan shall not exceed the amount of the unsold bonds which the committee has, by resolution, authorized to be sold for the purposes of Chapter 5. The board shall execute any documents as required by the Pooled Money Investment Board to obtain and repay the loan. Any amounts loaned shall be deposited in the fund to be allocated in accordance with Chapters 5 and 6. 4813. All money derived from premium and accrued interest an bonds sold shall be reserved and shall be available for transfer to the General Fund as a credit to expenditures for bond interest. 4814. Any bonds issued or sold pursuant to this Chapter may be refunded by the issuance of refunding bonds in accordance with Article 6 (commencing with Section 16780) of Chapter 4 of Part 3 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code. Approval by the electors of the state for the issuance of the bonds shall include approval of the issuance of any bonds issued to refund any bonds originally issued or any previously issued refunding bonds. 4815. (a) Notwithstanding Section 16312 of the Government Code and Section 4812, the interest on any loans made from the Pooled Money Investment ^ Account to the fund in order to carry out the purposes of Chapter 5 shall be paid from the General Fund. 22 f (b) Notwithstanding Section 13340 of the Government Code, the amounts required to be paid pursuant to subdivision (a) are hereby continuously appropriated from the General Fund. (c) The appropriations for interest payments pursuant to subdivision (b) are appropriations for debt service, as defined in Section 8 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution, and are therefore exempt from the appropriations -limit set by that Article. _ 4816. The People of the State of California hereby find and declare that, since the proceeds from the sale of bonds authorized by this Part are not 'proceeds of taxes' as that term is used in Article XIII B of the California Constitution, the disbursement of these proceeds .is not subject to the limitation imposed by that Article. 4817. It is the intent of the People of the State of California in enacting Chapters 5 and 6 that the bond funds authorized by Chapter 6 shall not be used to displace any existing sources of funds for the purposes authorized by Section 4803. Chapter 7 4818. Between November 7, 1990 and November 7, 1991. to the extent constitutionally permissible, no logging shall occur, and no timber harvesting plan authorizing such Logging shall be approved, within any stand of ancient redwood which, alone or in conjunction with any contiguous stand under public ownership, measures ten (10) or more acres and which has never previously been subject to timber harvesting. 4819. Any stand of ancient redwood may be logged only by using the selection method. For purposes of this Section, 'selection methad' means a silvicultural system in which continuous forest cover remains following - completion of logging operations, and in which the stand is at all times composed of trees of various ages and sizes. SECTION 18. Public Contract Code Section 12161 is repealed. SECTION 19. Section 12161 is added to the Public Contract Code, to read: 12161. For the purpose of this Article, -recycled paper product- means all paper and woodpulp products containing postconsumer waste and secondary waste materials as defined in this Section. 'Postcoasumer waste' means a finished material which would normally be disposed of as solid waste, having completed its life cycle as a consumer item. 'Secondary waste' means fragments of finished products or finished products of a manufacturing process which has converted a virgin resource into a commodity of real economic value and includes pastconsumer waste, but does not include fibrous waste generated during the manufacturing process such as fibers recovered from waste water or trimmings of paper machine rolls (mill broke) , wad slabs, chips, sawdust or other wad residue from a manufacturing process. 'Recycled paper product' means a paper product with not less than fifty percent of its total weight consisting 23 q � of secondary and postconsumer waste with not less than ten percent of its total weight consisting of postconsumer waste. -- SECTION 20. Sections 12162, 12163, and 12168 of the Public Contract Code are amended, to read: 12162. (a) The department and other state agencies, in consultation with the board, shall revise its their procedures and specifications for state purchases of paper products, to give preferencev-where-€easiblev to the purchase of paper products containing recycled paper as defined pursuant to Section 12161. (b) The department and other state agencies shall give preference to the suppliers of recycled paper products as defined pursuant to Section 12161. This preference shall be up-te-S 10 percent of the Lowest bid or price quoted by suppliers offering nonrecycled paper products. In bids in which the state has reserved the right.to make multiple awards, the recycled paper preference cost shall be applied, to the extent possible, so as to maximize the dollar participation of recycled business in the contract award. Fea--Iba-esWblAed-a®exa€-A€-pFe€aF68ae-granted-pxFBxaRa-as-this seamen-and-nay-ashes-previe lea-ef-law-eha11-sea-exaaed-eat-bandred-theueaAd dellare-ES 100v000a. Fda--Neswlahsaandiag-exbdivisiea-Fb9v-gad-cxbdivielea-Fan-a€-Seat}en 12168v-the-Faeysled-paper-bidder-pre€eFense-shall-not-exaaed-€i€sy-theasaad dellace-FSSBv000E-1€-a-pro€arenee-exceeding-6bat-ameuac-would-preelude-an-awaFd ae-a-small-bxe iAeae-6ha'e-9E€er6-AfiAFeayeled-papeF-pF edY6a8-aAd-ifi-qxa}i€ied in-aa6ardaaae-w(E)1-6aetiaa-1G838-aF-6}ia-CBYBFHa1eAE-Cade.--ihie-6xadkpi6ieR �/ 6hal}_aealy_eAly_wh6a-the-saaala-bxe ilea o-i e-the-lewe of-Fe opens ih}e-biddsv-BF ie-aliga, ;or-a aaaraet-award-on-the-basi e-of-appl i6aaioa-of-the-S-aove9At eau}}_bx64aesa-pre:"ereaae. Fed (c)_ To encourage the use of postcowsumer waste, the deeartmeat•s specifications of the department and other state agencies shall require recycled paper product contracts to be awarded to the bidder whose paper contains the greater percentage of postconsumer waste if the fitness and quality and price meet the requirements in Sections 12161 and 12162. F€> JAI The depactaena procuring agencies shall set the following goals for the purchasing of recycled paper products: (1) By January 1, 1992, at least 35 percent of the total dollar amount of paper products purchased or procured by the depasameaa procuring agencies shall be purchased as a recycled paper product. (2) By January 1, 1994, at least 40 percent of the total dollar amount of paper products purchased or procured by the department procuring agencies shall be purchased as a recycled paper product. (3) By January 1, 1996, at least 50 percent of the total dollar amount of paper products purchased or procured by the deparvena procuring agencies shall be purchased as a recycled paper product. Egg (e) Procuring agencies shall report to the department an their 24 progress in meeting the goals and shall submit to the department a detailed plan to meet the goals. The department shall develop a uniform reporting procedure by which agencies procuring products shall abide. If at any time a goal has not been met, the department, in consultation with the board, shall review procurement policies and shall make recommendations for immediate revision to ensure that each goal is met. Reviaiena-imladev-bmt-asa 8a6-;38f;<bed-CBy-E8;ei8g-6hB-paF8h8eing-pEe€BFaa6a-end-a;fieFiag-6hB-gBel a-€0F all-aF-0agh-Faeyoled-produa 6.--The-depart80Rs'-la-a BRaultatien-with-the-beard. shall-pre Bent-its-aonalaa ions-and-Fee emendations-en-these-Eavi6;a86-ei psaexsemea6-pe}ieia a-to-the-lagis latuEe-iR-the-department=6-asaaal-Eepeat passxaafi-69-gestien-;322g. 12163. (a) The director, in consultation with the board, shall review the procurement specifications currently used by the department and other state agencies in order to eliminate,-wheEever-ecaaem;cally feasible. discrimination against the procurement of recycled paper products. (b) The director, in consultation with the board, shall review the recycled paper product content specifications at least annually to consider increasing the percentage of recycled paper product in paper and woodpulp product purchases. The director shall include his or her conclusions and recommendations in the department's annual report pursuant to Section 12225. (a) When contracting with the department for the sale of material subject to this article, the contractor shall certify in writing to the contracting officer or his or her representative that the material offered contains the minimum percentage of recycled paper required by Section 12161 and shall specify the minimum, if not exact, percentage of secondary and -`/ postcansumer waste in the paper products. The certification shall be furnished under penalty of perjury. (d) The department, in consultation with the board, shall establish purchasing practices which, to the maximum extent economically feasible, assure purchase of materials which may be recycled or reused when discarded. (a) The department shall make every effort to eliminate purchases of paper products deemed potential contaminants to the state's recycling program pursuant to Section 12165. 12168. (a) Notwithstanding Sections 41074 and 41374 of the Public Resources Code. Fitness fitness and quality being f=ctionally aqua; adecuate, all local and-state-pxhlie-ageaeiae-shall-pusehase-sesysled-papeE-psedxcfis .ins toad-a€-aeasaeyeled-papeE-pEsdasfie-wheaeveF-avai}able-aE-ae-3lese-than-the Casa;-seat-a£-aeaceayaled-papas-psedaete.--All legal-pabiia agencies shall may give preference to the suppliers of recycled paper products., including but not Limited to printed recycled oaner products purchased or contracted for through commercial printers. This nrefere^.ce shall be at least 10 percent of the lowest bid or price auoted by suppliers offering nonrecvc'_ed oaner products. For the purnose of this section. *local agencies' means every city. county. city and ccunty. school district, and community college. All-;seal-�xblie-ageRaiac-nay-define-the-aaeua:-ef this-ace€e sense. In bids in which the local agency state has reserved the right to make multiple awards, the recycled paper preference cost shall be applied, to the extent possible, so as to maximize the dollar participation If firms offering recycled paper in the contract award. 25 Ekj--:xe-aemb#aed-aaeaxH-e€-pse€eseneae-granted-paceaane-ae-kh#e saetien-and-nay-other-psevie#sae-a€-law-eha;1-net-exeaed-sae-hvadcad-thousand de}lase-fS30py0004. fe4--Wetwiehetanding-subdivision-Ea4t-and-subdivision-Eb4-of Sea k#en-}236gr-t$e-caeys;ed-papas-bidder-pceEesenae-steal;-net-exsaed-€iEty kheseand-6e};ass-ES go,9094-i€-a-pse€erssea-exeeeding-that-ameuat-weuld prealuda-aa-award-ke-a-small-bueine a 0-that-a€Ease-weaseaya;ed-popes-psedue to and-16-qaa}#E#ed-ia-aesesdanae-with-Saesiea-;4838-aE-stet-CevesnmeaH-Cade. Th#e-psev#e#en-eha;;-apply-enly-when-the-seal}-bus inesa-ia-the-low et caepeae ib;a-b3ddac-ec-#e-a}#gib}e-€es-aenksaet-award-en-khe-bee#e-aE app;#eat#ea-aE-she-S-peseans-bueiaaae-pse€esenea. (b) If a local agency can demonstrate that existing levels of service have been or will be reduced because of financial obligations imposed by this Section, thev shall be entitled to receive reimbursement and may _ aonly for reimbursement from the Integrated Waste Management Account for the costs associated with this Section which are above those costs ordinarily incurred for the procurement of pacer products. TITLE FIVE SECTION 21. Division 27 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read: DIVISION V. BAY, ESTUARINE AND OCEAN WATER PROTECTION Chapter 1.. Marine Resources Sanctuary 37010. A Marine Resources Sanctuary is hereby created which includes all state marine bay, estuarine and ocean waters. To protect the Sanctuary and its resources: a) No state agency or official shall enter into any, lease for the extraction of oil or gas therefrom, unless the President of the United States has found a severe energy supply interruption and has ordered distribution of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve pursuant to 42 D. S. C. Section 6241(d) , and the Governor of California finds that the energy, resources of the Sanctuary will contribute significantly to the alleviation thereof. b) On and after January 1, 2000, no publicly owned treatment work shall discharge pollutants to the waters of the Sanctuary without at least secondary treatment, as defined by the federal Clean Water Act. No state agency or official shall approve, reapprove or concur in a waiver of such a secondary treatment requirement which would allow the discharge, after January 1, 2000, of pollutants to the craters of the -Sanctuary, without at least secondary treatment. 37011. Where necessary to maintain, protect or enhance the quality of the waters of the Sanctuary or its resources, the State Lands Commission or the California Coastal Commission may issue-cease and desist orders pursuant to the procedures of Government Code Sections 66637 through 66641. \ with respect to any permit, lease, license or other approval or authorization for any activity requiring a permit, lease, license or other approval or 26 authorization, and may levy administrative civil fines pursuant to the procedures and limitations of Government Code Sections 66641.5 through 66641.9. The maximum liability for violation of any such cease and desist order shall not exceed B25,000 per day. Any monies recovered hereunder by the State Lands Commission shall be deposited in the Land Bank Fund created by Section 8610, and any monies recovered hereunder by the California Coastal Commission shall be subject to Section 30823. Chapter Z. Oil Spill Prevention and Cleanup 37020. A State Oil Spill Coordinating Committee is hereby created, composed of the chairpersons of the California Coastal Commission and State Lands Commission, and the Director of the Department of Fish and Game, or their designees, to coordinate compliance with this Chapter. 37021. After January 1, 1992, no lease shall be issued or renewed for a potential source of oil spills, which source is located on granted or ungranted tidelands, unless the State Lands Commission has adopted, by regulation, the State Oil Spill Prevention Plan. The Plan shall: a) Be applicable to all potential sources of oil spills which may affect the Sanctuary and its resources; b) Be implemented through regulatory and land use actions by all agencies with jurisdiction over prevention measures identified is the Plan for potential sources of oil spills not within the jurisdiction of the State Lands Commission; c) Specify the prevention measures applicable to potential sources of oil spills including, but not limited to, requirements for the use of tugboat escorts for tankers, establishment of emergency stations for disabled tankers, and periodic inspections of potential sources of oil spills; and d) Include requirements for financial responsibility, applicable to potential sources of oil spills operating in or adjacent to the Sanctuary. 37022. (a) 37 January 1, 1992, the California Coastal Commission, in consultation with the State Lands Commission and the Department of Fish and Game, shall specify requirements for oil spill contingency plans for all potential sources of oil spills which may affect the Sanctuary established by Chanter 1, to the extent not preempted or prohibited . by federal law. (b) After January, 1, 1992, no permit or approval required by state or federal law from the California Coastal Commission or the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission, for any development or activity which may involve a potential source of an oil spill, shall be approved . unless an oil spill contingency plan has been approved by the appropriate Commission. (c) The requirements specified by the Commission pursuant to subdivision (a) shall ensure that each oil spill contingency plan incorporates the best available containment and cleanup technology and provides for maximum passible protection of the Sanctuary and its resources. 27 37023. By January 1, 1992. the California Coastal Commission shall adopt regulations for the preparation of local government and port oil spill contingency plans which shall be submitted to the Commission for certification and which shall be incorporated into certified local coastal programs and port �ar� master plans pursuant to the procedures of Chapters 6 and 8 of Division 20. SECTION- 22. Article 7 is added to Chapter 3 of Division 2 of the Fish and Game Code, to read: ARTICLE 7. OIL SPILL PREVENTION AND RESPONSE 1250. The Office of Oil Spill Response is hereby created in the Department of Fish and Game which shall be responsible for, and direct, all activities relating to oil spill response, including interagency coordination, oil spill contingency training and implementation of oil spill contingency plans. A Deputy Director of the Department of Fish and Game shall serve as Administrator of the Office. a) In the event of an oil spill into the waters of the state, the Administrator is authorized to expend from the Fund created by Public Resources Coda Section 6230, such moneys as he or she deems necessary to respond to the spill, assess the damage from the spill, restore the affected resources, and make emergency loans to victims of the spill. b) Any person responsible for the spilling or discharging of oil into the waters of the state, and each of their agents or employees, shall comply with directions of the Administrator regarding oil spill response, containment, and .- cleanup, subject to the overriding authority of the United States Coast Guard. Failure to comply with any such directions shall result in civil liability of the responsible party to the State of California of not less than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than two hundred fifty thousand dollars (S250,000) per day. c) The Administrator shall have sole state authority over the use of dispersants and any oil spill clean up agents in connection with an oil spill or discharge, consistent with the regulations adopted pursuant to Water Code Section 13169. d) The Administrator, in coordination with the California Coastal Commission, State Lands Commission and the United States Coast Guard shall carry out periodic announced and unannounced oil spill drills which shall ensure compliance with, and ability to implement, oil spill contingency plans and state interagency plans adopted pursuant to Government Code Section 8574.1. SECTION M. Section 8574.1 of the Government Code is amended, to read: 8574.1. in-addisien-se-nay-efi$ea-aaQhesisy-aeR'assed-open-she-6evesaes 6y-6)136-6hapses�-Qke-6evecnes-Hay-a sfia§lie`h-a-c:ase-ai:-spil:-seRfiLHgency-plaa paSBYaAfi-fie-fihe-9EBV39 iBHa-6-a-Q�dl9-a6QY6�d� The Govenor shall establish a State Interagency Oil Soil., Continency Plan nursuant to the orovisions of this Article. Division 7.3 of the Public Resources Cote. and Division 2 of Chanter 3 of Article 7 of the Fish and Game Code. The Plan shall be reviewed every two vears and modified as aonronriate. 28 SECTION 24. Chapter 3.5 of Part 1 0£ Division 6 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read: Chapter 3.3. Oil Spill Prevention and Response Fund _ 6230. The Oil Spill Prevention and Response Fund is hereby created. All money collected pursuant to Section 6232 shall be deposited in the Fund. 6231. (a) Notwithstanding Section 13340 of the Government Code, all money deposited in the Oil Spill Prevention and Response Fund is hereby continuously appropriated to the Office of Oil Spill Response and the Administrator thereof, without regard to fiscal years, for the purposes specified by Fish and Game Code section 1250(a) . The Legislature shall appropriate monies in the Fund, only as follows: (1) The State Lands Commission, the California Coastal Commission. and the Department of Fish and Game, shall each receive five percent (5Z) of the Fund in the first year in which mcaies become available for expenditure from the Fund, four percent (4Z) of the Fund in the second year, three percent . (3Z) of the Fund in the third year, two percent (2Z) of the Fund in the fourth year, and one percent (1Z) of the Fund in the fifth and each succeeding year thereafter, to be used as necessary to develop, implement and administer the responsibilities imposed by Chapter 2 of Division 27 of the Public Resources Code, by Article 7 of Chapter 3 of Division 2 of the Fish and Game Code, and by this Chapter. (2) The amount appropriated to each agency pursuant to subdivision (a) (1) shall not exceed two and one-half million dollars ($2,500,O00) annually, .unless the Legislature determines otherwise. (3) Monies in the Fund shall not be reap ropriated. (4) All amounts appropriated pursuant to this Section which are not encumbered within the period prescribed by law shall revert to the Fund. (b) Any appropriations made pursuant to this Section shall be used only for the purposes expressed, shall be used to supplement current levels of funding, and shall not be used to displace any existing sources of funds for the purposes authorized. 6232. The State Lands Commission shall be responsible for collecting and administering the Oil Spill Prevention and Response Fund. _ a) The Commission shall impose an oil spill prevention and response _ fee on each barrel of oil delivered to marine terminals by tanker, or through pipeline across, through or under state waters. That fee shall be commensurate with the oil spill risk posed by the method of transportation and volume of ail transported, but shall not is any case exceed twenty-five cents ($0.25) per barrel. No fee shall be imposed on any oil owned by a public entity. b) The fee shall be assessed at a rate sufficient for the Fend to reach five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000) within six (6) years, at which point it shall be considered fully funded and equivalent to the oil spill 29 r . risks posed. The fee shall be adjusted annually to ensure that the Fund remains within 1SZ of its fully funded level. Any and all interest collected shall be retained in the Fund. c) The Attorney General shall bring appropriate actions to recover from responsible parties expenditures from the Fund, and is successful proceedings shall be entitled to costs and attorney's fees. d) The State Lands Commission is authorized to reduce the size of the Fund required by subdivision (b) to a level it determines appropriate, if federal or state legislation enacted after October 10, 1989, establishes a similar fund, and if the Commission finds, after public hearing, that the federal or state legislation and fund are sufficient to provide at least the level of protection for marine resources and the People of the State of California required by state law. 6233. For purposes of this Chapter, Division 27 of this Code, and Section 1250 of the Fish and Game Code: (a) -Potential source of oil spills- means any facility of any kind, other than a tanker, which is or can be used for the purpose of exploring for, drilling for, producing, storing, handling, transferring, processing, refining or transporting oil including, but not limited to, marine terminals used for transferring oil to or from tankers, offshore pipelines, offshore oil exploration rigs and platforms, and development and production rigs and platforms. (b) -Oil- means any kind of petroleum, liquid hydrocarbons, or petroleum products or any fraction or residues therefrom. (c) 'Operator' has the same meaning as -responsible person' as defined in Harbors and Navigation Code Section 294(g) (7) (B) . (d) 'Responsible person- has the same meaning as in Harbors and Navigation Code Section 294(g)(7) . (a) 'Tanker' means a vessel, including but not limited to, oilers and barges, whether or not self-propelled, constructed or adapted for the carriage of oil in bulk or in commercial quantities as cargo. 6234. The People of the State of California hereby find and declare that, since the oil spill prevention and response fee imposed pursuant to this Chanter is a fee which is directly related to and will not exceed the costs which the State will reasonably bear in responding to and preventing oil spills, the disbursement of the proceeds of the fee in the manner specified is not subject to the limitation imposed by Article %III B of the California Constitution. SECTION 25. Section 30Z3Z.5 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read: 302'32.5. Notwithstanding Sect::ca 30Z50, oil shall be transported by land pipeline unless the applicant establishes and the Commission finds: 30 a) Transportation by pipeline is not feasible, or will act be feasible within a reasonable period of time because of pipeline unavailability, inadequate capacity, or unreasonable tariffs; b) Pipeline transportation has greater adverse environmental effects; - c) All alternative pipeline routes and methods have been considered; d) The environmental impacts of the alternative transportation mode are mitigated to the maximum extent feasible; and e) The applicant has made an enforceable commitment to use a' pipeline as soon as operational and available. SECTION 26. Chapter 5.7 is added to the Water Code, to read: Chapter 5.7. Water Quality Protection 13397. The most protective water quality criteria for toxic pollutants developed by the Environmental Protection Agency, pursuant to Section 304(a) of the federal Clean Water Act are hereby adopted as water quality objectives, except where the Environmental Protection Agency approves a standard submitted by the State pursuant to Section 303 of the Clean Water Act, or where the State has adopted a more stringent standard pursuant to this Division. 13397.5. By January 1, 1993, sediment quality objectives, as defined by Section 13391.5(d) , for toxic pollutants specified by Section 13392.5(a) , shall be adopted as water quality standards for the state's marine bay, estuarine and coastal waters. Those standards shall ensure the full protection of public health and recreational values, and the full protection and propagation of fish, shellfish and their habitat. 13397.6. (a) The state board shall develop a statewide monitoring program to assess water and sediment quality and the biological health of marine bay, estuarine and ocean waters. The Board shall report biennially to the Governor and the legislature on the water and sediment quality of such waters, and the health of marine resources. Each such report shall provide a descriptive and numerical comparative analysis of each bay, estuarine, and coastal water area from the status at the time of the prior report. (b) Each regional board shall develop specific plans for full • protection of public health and recreational values, and for the full protection and propagation of fish, shellfish and their habitat in the state's marine bay, estuarine and ocean waters. In developing such plans, the regional boards shall ensure full public participation of ali interested parties. 13397.7. (a) By June 1, 1992, unless earlier required by federal or state law, the regional boards and the board shall establish total maximum daily loads, load allocations, and waste load allocations, as required by the federal Clean Water Act, for toxic pollutants which address all point and nonpoint industrial, municipal, agricultural, and other sources of discharge into any marine hay, estuarine or ocean waters. By June 1, 1994, unless earlier required by federal or other state law. the regional boards shall implement 31 f such total maximum daily loads, load allocations and waste load allocations, through the issuance or amendment of waste discharge requirements. The requirements shall include specific discharge limits sufficient to satisfy the load allocations and waste load allocations, and shall also include an adequate margin of safety that reflects any lack of knowledge about pollutant sources and attainment of water quality standards and policies. The regional boards shall periodically revise such limits. (b) If the water quality standards for any toxic pollutant are not met for any marine bay, estuarine, or ocean waters, and if the regional boards have not implemented the total maximum daily loads, load allocations, and waste Load allocations within the required deadlines, then the regional boards shall be prohibited from issuing or amending any waste discharge requirement that increases the discharge of that pollutant into any such water. 13397.8. The state board shall require each coastal county to develop and submit, by January 1, 1994, for state hoard approval a comprehensive stormwater management and control plan for existing and new development. The plan shall include implementation, funding and enforcement components designed to minimize runoff to bay, estuarine and ocean waters. 13398. (a) On and after January 1, 1992, a permittee shall submit a pollution prevention audit for review by the appropriate regional board prior to the issuance or renewal of: (1) Any local waste water discharge permit to an industrial user discharging 25,000 gallons or more daily into a publicly owned treatment works; (2) Such permits for users with a lesser discharge as required by the State Board or a regional board: or (3) A permit issued pursuant to Chapter 3.5 of the Water Code, exceot one issued to a publicly owned treatment works. (b) The board shall, in consultation with other appropriate agencies, determine whether the audit contains the information required by this Section and whether it demonstrates by clear and convincing evidence that a reasonable effort is being made to prevent pollution, and the board shall require any necessary revisions. (c) Progress towards implementation of the audit shall be an enforceable condition of any permit specified in subdivision (a). (d) Each such audit shall: (1) Identify all routinely discharged pollutants suspected of contributing to water quality degradation, standards violations, or adverse impacts on beneficial uses, and all in-plant activities, processes or operations which are the sources thereof; and (Z) Include for each such pollutant all of the following: (a) An estimata of the mass quantity discharged from each source identified in (d) (1) and the amount entering and exiting each treatment unit within the plant; 32 (b) An evaluation of the pollution prevention measures available \'.W1 and in-plant recycling and the degree to which each will prevent pollution and is technically feasible and economically practicable; (c) Based thereon. a specification of the measures that will be implemented by the discharger, and a factual showing, based on clear and convicting evidence, why any available measure was not implemented; and (d) A schedule for implementation. (a) For purposes of this Section, *pollution prevention measures' means input changes, product reformulation, process operations improvements, process equipment improvements, and in-process recycling. (f) The regional board and any, other agency reviewing such an audit shall protect from public disclosure any audit information which is a trade secret within the meaning of Section 6254.7(d) of the Government Code, providing that (1) a claim of confidentiality is made at the time the audit is submitted and (2) accepting the Claim of confidentiality would not be inconsistent with the requirements for state programs or publicly owed treatment works pragrams implementing the federal Clean Vacer Act or acts which amend or supplement that Act. 13398.5. Publicly owned treatment works shall establish technical assistance programs to assist their industrial dischargers that discharge Less than 25,000 gallons daily, in the development of pollution prevention audits consistent with the requirements of Section 13398. Publicly owed \%.011 treatment works may revise their industrial discharge fees to fund such programs. 13399. The state board shall adjust and increase its schedule of permit fees applicable to all direct and indirect industrial and commercial dischargers, which are assessed and collected annually. The schedule of fees, as adjusted, shall be increased in an amount sufficient to fund the responsibilities of the board and regional boards under this Chanter and the responsibilities of the Department of Health Services pursuant to Article 10.1 of Chapter 2 of Part 1 of Division 1 of the Health and Safety Code, shall create incentives to reduce pollutant discharge, and shall be based on the total number of dischargers assessed fees, the relative amount and toxicity of pollutants discharged, and such other factors that the Board finds necessary; provided, however, that the increase in the amount of fees required by this Section shall not exceed two million dollars. SECTION V. Article 10.1 is added to Chapter 2 of Part 1 of Division 1 of the Health and Safety Code, to read: ARTICLE 10.1. MARINE RESOURCES AND HUMAN HEALTH STANDARDS 427.10. The State Department of Health Services shall take all necessary actions to identify threats to public health from contaminated fish, and from waters that pose a public health threat to swimmers or beach users, and shall take all necessary steps to warn and protect the public from such threats to public health. 33 427.11. (a) By December 31, 1991. the Director shall adopt, by _ regulation, based on clear and convincing evidence, health based standards for poisonous or deleterious substances, as defined in Section 26520, including, but not limited to, aldrin, dieldrim, benzine hexachloride, chlordane, DDT, endrin, heptachlor and heptachlor epoxide. PCBs, heavy metals, mercury, dioxins, copper, lead, zinc. toxaphene, and bacterial and viral contaminants, in fish and shellfish, and other marine Life used for food, in accordance with the standards specified for pesticides in Section 26906(b). If, however, the presence of pervasive, unavoidable environmental contaminants exceeds those standards, the consequences of the application of those standards on the availability of an adequate, wholesome, and economical marine food supply shall be considered, and those standards shall be modified accordingly; provided that, this exception shall be strictly construed to protect the public health, while recognizing the uncontrollable mature of the presence of those contaminants. (b) The Department shall, in cooperation with the Department of Fish and Game, exercise all powers available under Division 21 of this Code, and shall take all appropriate actions to prevent human consumption of fish containing substances in excess of the standards established by subsection (a) , including the closure of specific areas or the prohibition of the taking of species within specific areas in sport or caomiercial fishing. (c) The standards adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) shall be valid for no longer than seven years from the date of adoption.. All those standards shall be reviewed by the Director five years following the date of adoption to determine if there has been a reduction, or increase, in the persistence or pervasiveness of each environmental contaminant. All standards shall be - .. revised accordingly. Proposed regulations revising or continuing the standards shall be promulgated six months prior to the expiration date of any applicable standards. Each revision or continuation of a standard shall be supported by clear and convincing evidence. 427.12. (a) By January 1, 1992, the Department, in cooperation with the State Water Resources Control Board, shall develop and adopt safe statewide water quality standards for swimmers and beach users for marine bay, estuarine, . and coastal waters utilizing both coliform bacterium and enterococci bacterium as indicators. In developing standards, the Department shall also consider the protection of children and the risks associated with viruses. (b) Any body of water found to exceed such standards shall, in -addition to the requirements of Section 427.5, immediately be posted with a public health warming by the public health official having jurisdiction over such area. The area shall remain posted until such time as the standard is complied with. _ (a) If any body of water exceeds these standards for thirty (30) or more days per year, the public health official having jurisdiction over such area shall post a permanent health warning notifying the public of the chronic contamination. The public health official shall report chronic contamination postings to the regional water quality control board in whose jurisdiction the body of water is located. The warnings may be removed only when the body of water experiences less thaw thirty (30) days per year of chrani_ contamination. 34 427.13. Nothing in this Article shall be construed to remove or diminish the obligations of any person under Chapter 6.6 of Division 20 with regard to any substance to which this Article applies. . TITLE SIX SECTION 25. Chapter 3.5 is added to Title 2 of the Government Code, to read: Chapter 3.5 Environmental Advocate 12260. (a) The Office of the Environmental Advocate is hereby created. There is in state government as Environmental Advocate, who shall administer the Office of the Environmental Advocate. The Environmental Advocate shall be elected in the General Election of 1992 in the same manner as the Governor, for a term of two years, and thereafter for a term of four years. (b) The Office of the Environmental Advocate shall have all the proper powers of a Department of the executive branch. (c) The Environmental Advocate shall advocate the proper implementation of the Environmental Protection Act of 1990, and the full and complete enforcement of all the laws of the State of California relating to environmental protection and public health. The Environmental Advocate shall conduct oversight investigations, studies and any other analyses appropriate to ensure compliance with such laws. The Environmental Advocate shall also recommend to private parties, the Governor, the Legislature, the United States Congress and all appropriate agencies policies and actions to ensure environmental protection and public health. (d) The California Council on Environmental Quality is hereby created, as part of the Office of the Environmental Advocate. The Governor shall appoint six members to the Council, subject to Senate confirmation, each for a term ending January 1. 1993, and the Director of the Department of Health Services shall serve as chairperson until that data. Upon election of the Environmental Advocate, the Advocate shall appoint six members to the Council, subject to Senate confirmation, for two year terms, and the Advocate shall serve as chairperson. Each member of the Council shall have significant expertise on questions of environmental protection and public health, and the Council shall include representatives of the University of California and the California State Universities. Each member shall serve without compensation• but shall be reimbursed for actual and necessary expenses incurred in the performance of his or her duties to the extent that reimbursement is not otherwise provided by another public agency or agencies, and shall also receive one hundred dollars ($100) for each full day of attending meetings of the Council. Each member of the Council shall be subject to Chapter 7 of Title 9 of the Government Code. (e) The Council shall issue periodic reports on the state of the environment and shall evaluate the state'; progress towards meeting the requirements of the Environmental Protection Act of 1990. 35 (£) She Council shall also: (1) Administer a competitive grants program for applied research and extension on alternatives to pesticides in agriculture, including interdisciplinary projects on alternative farming systems, methods, processes and technologies; (2) Administer a Competitive grants program for applied research on development of alternatives and other methods for compliance with Titles 4 and 5 0£ the Environmental Protection Act of 1990, and for methods of source reduction of toxic chemicals in the State. (g) All public agencies of the State of California shall cooperate with the Environmental Advocate and shall provide information to the Environmental Advocate upon request necessary to carry out his or her duties. (h) The Legislature may assign additional responsibilities to the Environmental Advocate, consistent with this Section. The Governor and Legislature shall appropriate funds and provide personnel to the Office of the Environmental Advocate sufficient for the Environmental Advocate to - meet the requirements of this Section. (i) The Advocate, in his or her name, is authorized to bring or intervene in any legal or other proceeding to ensure compliance with the Environmental Protection Act of 1990 or other laws enacted to protect the environment and public health. Before undertaking any such action, the Advocate shall initiate all appropriate means to resolve the matter informally, by conferring with all the affected parties. To the extent the Attorney General also has the authority to take such action, the Advocate shall give sixty (60) days notice of theproposed action, and may proceed thereafter only �ar� if the Attorney General declines to proceed. If the Attorney General elects to initiate, or intervene in, the proposed proceeding, the Advocate may thereafter intervene therein, as a matter of right. However, the requirement for a sixty (60) day notice shall be inapplicable in situations where earlier action is necessary to achieve compliance, but in all such cases the Advocate shall confer with the Attorney General prior to filing. (j) The salary of the Environmental Advocate shall be as specified and determined by Government Code Section 11552.3. (k) Notwithstanding Section 13340 of the Government Code, the sum of seven hundred fifty thousand dollars ($750,000) is hereby appropriated from the General Fund to the Office of the Environmental Advocate for operations during fiscal year 1992-1993. (1) Notwithstanding Section 13340 of the Government Code, the sum of forty million dollars ($40,000,000) is continuously appropriated from the General Fund to the Office of the Environmental Advocate, without regard to fiscal years, for the grants programs specified in subdivision (f) , to be allocated equally between the purposes specified in subdivision (f)(1) and those specified in subdivision (f)(2). Until the Environnental Advocate is elected, no more than twenty five percent (25Z) of such grant funds may be awarded. 36 TITLE SEVEN SECTION 29. Division 13.2 is added to the PublicResources Code, to read: DIVISION 13.2. ENFORCEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT OF 1990 21180. (a) In addition to any other remedy available at Law or in equity, any provision of the Environmental Protection Act of 1990 that requires or forbids a private party to take or refrain from action directly affecting the environment or human health may be enforced pursuant to this section. Any ., person. including any governmental agency, who has violated, is violating, or is threatening to violate any such provision may be enjoined, and a Civil Penalty may be imposed, in any court of competent jurisdiction. (b) An action pursuant to this section may be brought by the Attorney General in the name of the People of the State of California, or by any district attorney, or by any city attorney of a city or city and county having a population in excess of 750,000, or with the consent of the district attorney by any city attorney or city prosecutor. (c) An action pursuant to this 'section may be brought by any person acting in the public interest if: (1) the action is commenced more than sixty days after the person has given written notice of the violation which is the subject of the action to the Attorney General and the district attorney and any city attorney in whose jurisdiction the violation is alleged to occur, and to the alleged violator; and (2) none of such public officials has commenced and is diligently prosecuting an action against such violation. The limitations specified in this subsection do not apply to an action brought against a governmental agency or official. (d) If a public official undertakes a prosecution pursuant to the written notice described in subdivision (c)(1) , before the noticing party brings an action under subdivision (c), the person who gave the notice shall be permitted to intervene in the action on such terms as the court finds appropriate. (a) The Legislature shall establish appropriate penalties, civil and criminal, for violations of the provisions of the Act for which a penalty is not specified. These penalties need not be uniform. These penalties shall provide that in any civil action brought pursuant to subdivision (c) any prevailing plaintiff and intervenor shall be entitled to share in an appropriate portion of any civil penalty imposed, as well as appropriate attorney's fees authorized by any other provision of law. An intervenor may receive attorneys fees upon a finding by the court that the efforts of the intervenor substantially assisted the court in reaching a just resolution of the case. In such event, the court shall divide the portion of civil penalties awarded, and shall award attorney's fees, taking into account the respective contributions of the parties to the success of the action and the need for intervention. 21181. All laws and regulations of this State designed to protect the food supply or environment, including this Act, shall be Ui erally construed to achieve those purposes. . �/ 37 TITLE EIGHT . SECTION 30. Governor's Responsibility The Governor is accountable to the People of the State of California for the complete, timely and effective implementation of this Act. The Governor shall therefore annually report to the People on the status of implementation, beginning October 13, 1991. TITLE HINE SECTION 31. Technical Matters (a) If any provision of this Act, or the application of that provision to any person or circumstances, is held invalid, the remainder of this Act, to the ma4m„m extent it can be given effect, or the application of that provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to Which it is held invalid, shall not be affected thereby, and to this end the provisions of this Act are severable. (b) This Act shall be liberally construed and applied in order to fully promote its underlying purposes, so that if more than one construction of a particular provision is possible, the one Which more fully accomplishes the purposes of this Act shall be applicable. (c) No provision of this Act shall be amended by the Legislature, except to further its purposes by a statute passed by each house by roll call vote entered in the journal With too-thirds of each membership concurring, if at least fourteen days prior to passage in each house the bill is in its final form, or by a statute that becomes effective only When approved by the electorate. (d) Any regulation adopted by an agency, department or official charged With enforcing any provision of this Act is not subject to Article 6 of Chapter 3.3 of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code. Any such regulation shall include a statement as to the basis upon Which it is predicated. (a) All references to statutes or regulations in this Act are to the text thereof in effect October 10, 1989, unless changes to those statutes or . regulations further the purpose of this Act. In that event, this Act shall be interpreted to refer to the amended statute or regulation. (£) Nothing in this Act shall diminish any legal obligation otherwise imposed by common law, statute or regulation, nor enlarge any defense in any action to enforce that legal obligation. Any penalties or sanctions imposed under this Act shall be in addition to any penalties or sanctions otherwise prescribed by law. (g) For purposes of this Act, •person•. shall have the same meaning as in Section 26024 of the Health and Safety Code, and shall also include the Un_-:d States, and its agencies and officials to the extent caast'_=utionally permissible. 38 .. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS -R i e6 Name of Paper Section Papa Date e Sub,90 Re lq- &r K l `1'23-90atMe7a a osrfioyt /z$ Under the surface, the Hayden initiative is an exercise in hysteria based on bad science and worse economics By Warren T. Brookes Wildaysky.attributes those healthy environments year ago in July, the world was to our risk"-taking system: "The secret of safety lies transformed by the sight of a in danger.Bypursuing a vigorous program of trial- lonely Chinese student in Tianan- and-error technological development,.Western na- r ' men Square standing in front of tions have.indeed incurred risks stemming from the lead tank in a column,tempo- these opportunities. But the benefits have out- tartly blocking its destructive as- weighed the harm." sault on China's incipient democ. Sadly, Americans have either forgotten that les- racy movement. son, or never fully,learned it, as this nation now While that movement was crushed,the peoples of seems more willing than ever to give up big benefits Eastern Europe were emboldened to break their to control either imaginary or infinitesimal risks. own shackles with similarly risky demonstrations Yet if we are not careful to separate fact from by modern Joshuas circling socialism's walls with hysteria, the inevitable result of such controls will nothing more than shouted praise for individual be to decrease our standard of living,and increase liberty. poverty, which is the greatest health threat of all. Americans held their breath waiting for those Even as Eastern Europe turns to the risky busi- risk-taking ventures to fail. Instead,the wails came ness of self-government and market capitalism, tumbling down in one country after another as com- Americans are being led in part by a dangerously munism and statism collapsed. shallow media press to engage in the reckless regu- These last heady months should serve as a timely latory pursuit of zero risk,and a Flat-Earth assault reminder of our own nation's heritage, Forged as it on science and technology. was by men and women who literally risked their When-Columbus set sail for the New World, he lives in the pursuit of life and liberty,leaving behind was warned he would sail off the edge into an un- both the security and shackles of statist systems. known abyss.I and convinced that one of those at the While many failed and paid the ultimate sacrifice, dock trying to get him to change his mind was the results of that vast experiment in risk-taking Stanford biologist Paul Ehrlich's ancestor Pablo. known as America have far exceeded the wildest Fortunately, Columbus decided the potential dreams of humanity,not only in economic prosper:- benefits of his science far outweighed the risks in ty and human development but in human health. Pablo's superstitions, and he opened mankind's As Berkeley's own Aaron Wildaysky asks, mental and physical horizons forever. "Would you rather have the health and safety and - Unfortunately. Pablo's descendant, Paul, still environmental records of socialist or capitalist thinks Columbus should never have made the trip. countries?The only known instances of substantial While we now laugh at literal "flat-Earthers," we declines in longevity occur in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe,while countries with private prop- Please see BIG GREENIK6 erty and market-price systems like the European democracies.the United States,and Japan all show steadily improving health rates." Mr. Brookes is an economist and syndicated columnist. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CUPPINGS z c Name of Pager Sectlal PaageSuh;tax BIG GREEN: The initiative's scientific premises are weak its economic implications, grim FROM Kt routinely pay reverent homage and attention tb their cultural descendants whose underlying pre- cides and food safety;and the second is contained mice is, as Jaquefine Faziin points out in her re, in Title IY,coveringgreenhouse-gas reduction and markable book, The War Against Population, lacking up the ancient forests. Both titles in turn "pollution is primarily caused by too many pen- ate reinforced by Title Six,which sets up the elec- ple." five Office of Environmental Advocate,who may As the nation's tap boor so environmentalists put have more power over the economy than the 91 it in their 1977 Unfinished Agenda, "population ernor... stabilization is the only possible long-term solution 4 : What is troubling about both aspects of this ve- to environmental problems. Increasing food pro- markably draconian and costly initiative is how duction will certainly be necessary in the Short - weak are its scientific premises,particularly food term,but it should be considered the least davit. safety.Indeed the scientific rase for global warm- able...... ing,as flimsy as it is,is finitely less so than that In his 1968 book,The Population Bomb,Ehrlich on agricultural chemicals. said "the battle to feed humanity is over. In the in fact most,if not all,top food toxicologists are 19703, the world will undergo famines...a mini- emaciated at the apparently growing consumer mum of 10 million people, most of them children, paranoia on pesticides. But than that paranoia will starve to death during each year of the 191 may ant be that great,after all.Two months ago, and the world population would "die back" to 1.5 the Sacramento food chain Raley's Markets billion by 1995. scaled back organic produce sections in all 43 Unfortunately from Erhlich's perspective,since stores. The reason? "We can't afford to keep 1974 the world's average yield of wheat has in, throwing it away,"said Charles Collings,Raley's creased 36 partial. World rice yields have in. president. "We thought the interest was higher creased 38 percent.Coarse grain yields have risen than it's proven to be." 30percent.These yield gains have far outran popu. The real reason for this lack of interest is that lation and helped convert the world's two most organic foods cost as much as 3050 percent more, populous nations,China and India,from food am- and,for the most part,do not look or tame as goad potters to food exporters. as conventionally grown produce. (The best kept Indeed,our entire experience since 1970 puts the secret is they are probably not as safe either.) So lie to the"limits to growth"theses first spelled out Raley's,one of the first to capitalize on the nation. by the Club of Rome in 191 which said resources wide score over Alar(a scare in part orchestrated were running out and urged the pursuit of"global by the organic foods industry)was the first to face equilibrium,"which they described as happening consumer reality: Polls show up to 84 percent when"population and capital are essentially sta- might prefer organic foods,but only if they didn't ble.with the forces tending to increase or decrease have to pay any more for it. them in a carefully controlled balance." So if they won't buy them voluntarily,bring on They didn't tell us who would "control" that Hayden.The literal effect of that initiative would balance,but they laid out the conditions for what be to raise the nationwide prices of fruits and they called a "steady state" society that sounds vegetables by at least 30 percent and probably suspiciously like the Soviet Union and Eastern more—and if this idea were to catch on nation- Europe before communism's collapse. wide, the total cost in higher food prices alone Today these same folks,having failed to make would easily exceed$40-60 billion. the economic or scientific case that resources will If interpreted strictly, Hayden would force the limit our growth,have shifted their approach into banning of perhaps two-thirds of all pesticides now two new and different directions,both of which are used in a state that now produces So percent of all embodied in the so-called Hayden Initiative, or US fresh vegetables and fruit. "Environmental Protection Act of 191 which is That is because it would ban any pesticide that an insult toresponsible environmentalism,as well has been shown to have caused cancer in rodent as.science and economics. tests,regardless of the tolerances now allowed by Some are calling it the Big Green.I would call it FDA and EPA. Bear in mind these are all chemi- Charlie Brown's Great Killer Watermelon—dark cals that have already been shown to cause no green on the outside, red on the inside—less to harm to animals at from 1,000 to 10,000 times the denote its political agenda than its likely result in levels of maximum allowable human exposure. diminished economic prosperity. While Big Green retains that already mammoth Its two thrusts are: First, to slow down our margin of safety, it adds a new bright-line stan- resource capacity to feed and clothe ourselves; dard of'Significant risk"as anything contributing and second,to limit the level at which we use those --to a risk of cancer in the exposed population resources, thus forcing population stabilization which exceeds the rate of one in a million,utilizing and decline. The first is contained in an all-out the most conservative risk assessment model." assault on the nation's largest and healthiest agri- I As any biologist or statitistician could tell you,1 ' culture industry,contained in Title Three on and. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS 3 6 Naltte of P;W7 sealan I Paa3 Data I subject d� its synthesized derivative UDMH in apple juice constitutBit a major cancer risk for children of in a million is biologically zetarisk.The risk of an from 240 to 910 per million. airplane failing out of the sky and killing you is Although NRDS's risk estimates were 20 times about 3 in a million.Even so,itmay surprise one to as high as those of the EPA and over 100 times as know that virtually all of the prospectively banned high as even the state of California,CBS got EPA's chemicals could easily pass that one in 1 million Dr. Jack Moore to admit on camera that if the standard,were it not that the"most conservative industry were to apply now for a tolerance on risk assessment model" assumes thousands of dammozide, it would be denied, but the law times higher levels of chemical exposure than ac. stopped him from immediately withdrawing Afar, really take place. because Uniroyal world sue EPA. You would never know this from the petition's The entire CBSNRDC report was based on one hysterical language: "Each year millions of discredited,1M bicassay on daminozide,conduct- pounds of pesticides are used in California and ed by Nebraska cancer researcher Bela Toth who eventually contaminate the food chain, drinking found both daminoxide and its synthesized deriva- water supply, ocean, air, still, and ecosystem. tive known as UDMH produced rumors in mice. Many of these pesticides present clear hazards to Since several similar daminoxide studies had human life and health." sboam no cancers,his findings were immediately If that is really the case, why have all of the mom.In 1978,a National Cancer Institute Study major tumors associated with these chemicals an 344 lab mice-and rals showed no increases in been declining not only here,but in Europe where tumors.they use four times as much of these chemicals as In 1985, a federal Scientific Advisory Panel --- — - (SAP) reviewed the L077 Toth data and found he we do per acre? And why are California consum- had fed the animals far more than the maximum. ers so reluctant to put their green money where tolerated dosage,some 266,000 times human expo- their green mouth is? Are they just foolish risk- sure.Asa result,the SAP concluded that the entire taken,or are they making a rational risk-benefit Toth study was"useless for assessing carcinogen- assessment? is risk from Alar,and provided no basis forcancel- The nation's top food-safety official, Harvard ing its registration." microbiologist Dr. Robert Scheuplem of the Food Even so, in 1986 EPA ordered Uniroyal to con- and Drug Administration,thinks they are perfect- duct additional studies. When those studies also ly rational. He has studied this issue for 2D years failed to produce any cancers at the modeled toler- and concluded that the effective cancer risk from ated (20 ppm) dosage levels, they ordered the V pesticide residues was 0.0000076. dosages to be boosted to 40 ppm (with no effects) When I asked him at the Hudson Institute Con- and than to 80 ppm, when toxicity was killing 80 ference last April what that meant as a percentage percent of the animals prematurely.At that level, of all 500,000 cancer deaths,he said"Oh,about.01 they finally produced the First female mouse tu- percent."I said, "You mean less than 50, nation, mor at four times the legal tolerance — some wide?" "Oh,much less than that" he said. "Less 22,000 times higher than the maximum exposure than40?"I pressed."Oh,much less thanthat,"he for children. No rat rumors were ever produced. said. "Well give me a number," I pushed. From this incredible result, the EPA then con- "No,I won't,"he said,"because I don't honestly cluded that Alar might cause 45 cancers per mil- believe anyone has ever died of ingesting pesti- Bon in humans,and therefore ultimately had to be cide residues on food!" removed from the market, even though its sus- Sadly,the EPA estimates the riskat up to 3,000 pected carcinogenicity is about half that of San deaths a year.Basedon that,it is-now carrying out Francisco tap water. a systematic cancellation of some 22,5W agrl- This kind of insanity has even the government's chemicals. The USDA estimates that some 4,.S00 top toxicologists muttering.Last March,Dr.Ron- specific applications will be lost. About 1,000 of ald Hart,director of the National Center for Toxi- those are considered "essential." cological Research, told me, "Our animal bless- Only last February, the National Research say risk models are based on at least 50 assump- Council concluded that one of the best ways to now, none of which have been scientifically fight cancer and all other chronic diseases was to demonstrated."More important, the high-caloric increase our consumption of fresh fruits and vege- feeding rate itself may be caacer-causmg. Said tables.Not only that,the MRC report specifically Dr.Hart, "We feed rodents'all you can eat'buf- argued the benefits of such increased consumption fets every day,yet we know that caloric intake is infinitely outweighed the small risks of the chemi- the single greatest contributing cause of cancer.In cals used to produce them. It was a decided and fact,we found you can modify the cancer-causing implicit indictment of pesticide-mania, organic impact of one of the most potent carcinogens from farming, and the EPA. 90 percent down to less than 3 percent, just by Sadly, that NRC report was preempted by the cutting caloric intake 20 percent.This means ani- Natural Resources Defense Council, which three mal tests increase cancer susceptibility and skew nights before,on Feb.26,used CBS's"60 Minutes" the results." to reach 30 million viewers with a report called These biased results are then extrapolated in a "Intolerable Risk: Pesticides in our Childrm's straight line down tozero exposure on the assuinp- Food." tion that there is no safe threshold of risk below �? That "study." which was never peer-reviewed which there are no adverse health effects — a for nbolarly publication, said not only was the violation of the basic rule of toxicology that "the product Alar,'a trade name for daminmide, a dose makes the poison."Indeed,virtually all bio- "known carcinogen"but that its an on apples and assays show decided thresholds of risk. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Nano of Paper Sedum Page Dam Subject In January m,CDC's director of Envtronmen- tal Health,Dr. Veron Houk,told an Atlanta envf- That means, according to Berkeley's Bruce rinmental symposium, "Risk assessment policy Ames, "99.99 percent of a6 pesticide carcinogens that relies solely on screening bioassay [animal now ingested by humans are natural — that is, test]results from the most sensitive species,is not generated as defense mechanisms within the based on scientific principles.Neither is it credible plants themselves." It was this discovery that led or reliable... ...He said these tests"have general- ly overpredicted the incidence of cancer in ex- posed populations." He had every reason to know what he was talk- ing about.He was the one who caused the evacm- tion of Times Beach,Mo.,over the dioxin scare,an evacuation he now readily admits was probably _ unnecessary.Unfortunately,the animal bioassays on dioxin showed it to be an exquisitely toxic sub- stance. Yet now,human epidemiology shows that 'U even the most exposed humans with levels of dioxin in their blood up to 1,000 times background _ -r.- show no increase in cancers. Houk told us "it - - ' turns out that humans just are not as susceptible to tip ` dioxin as guinea pigs." ` Not only do those bioassays wildly overestimate human toxic risk, the EPA then applies exposure models that furiously exaggerate even that num- her. In fact,most chemicals that test positive be- - ' "— come"dangerous"only because EPA's risk mod- el assumes every producer uses every chemical to pg the maximum legal limit,and residues are alwaysat maximum allowable levels. But every annual q. FDA study shows 70 percent of all fruit and vegeta- ble product ties no residues at all. _ In October 1989,a published study by Dr.Sandra Archibald of of the Stanford University Food Re- ' >� search Institute and Dr.Carl Winter of the Uaiver- sity of California at Riverside found that those c-. r assumptions overstate actual exposure and risk by 21,000 times on apples,2,600 times on tomatoes, and nearly 300 times on lettuce. For example, instead of the NRC's estimated cancer risk of 1,762per million from pesticides on apples, Stanford - found only 0.07 per million. Archibald and Winter found that instead of the NRC's 1987 calculation of the current risk for all Tom Hayden registered food chemicals of nearly 6,000 cancer risks in a million,the most likely actual number is - Ames,who had sounded the original alarm about probably less than 30, which incidentally is the pesticide dangers, to effectively mm that alarm number given by Sir Richard Doll and Richard down. Peto, Oxford's world renowned epidemiologists But Vernon Houk agrees: ".Ames is absolutely who called pesticide residue risks "trivial." right oft this issue. The risk models on pesticides Dr.Sanford Miller,dean of the Graduate School are vastly overdrawn." Or as Sanford Miller put of Biomedical Science at the Univiversity of Texas it, "If we applied 'Delaney' to all food we would Health Science Center, told us, "The biological never get to die of cancer. We would all starve to risk of pesticide residues to consumers is effec- death first bemuse we'd have to ban all the foods tively zero." That was also the conclusion of a we now eat! In fact, just to equal the NBC and conference report representing 100,000 food toxi- EPA's assumptions.on exposure, ,you'd have eat cologists across the nation on Aug. 29-30. 1989, over 20 pounds of fruit and vegetables every day!" which said the health risks of 'trace amounts of Yet it was that biased exposure model that un- pesticides is negligible or nonexistent." derlay last Deminber's decision by EPA Adminis- But such common-sense findings are still con- trator William Reilly to phase out the use of ail travened by the "Delaney Clause" of the federal major EDBCs,the most widely used fungicides,at Food.Drug,and Cosmetic Act,which forces what a cost in higher prices and lost commodities of amounts to a"no-risk"standard for any chemical over$2 billion a year. which tests positive for cancer in rodents. Worse,said Winter and Archibald."Elimination y Given the biased nature of such animal biros- of specific fungicides...could decrease the safety says,it is not surprising over half of all pesticides of the food supply by allowing the production of tested turn out to be rodent carcinogens. More greater levels of fungal carcinogens," which intriguing, the same tests show nearly half of all Miller says"are perhaps the most potent carcino- the natural plant pesticides thus far tested are gees in nature." rodent carcinogens. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATICN DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS - S 6 Nana of Paper Settle! per. pyte Subject Unfortunate!➢. when Agriculture 3mretary Clayton Yuerter announced his ping to reform th e Delaney Amendment and begin weighing such risks against benefits, some environmentalists want ballistic.NRDC lawyer Jane[Hethaway said "allowing EPA to consider the cominued use of a chemical whenever the benefits outweigh the risks is absolutely anathema to the environmental coca• munity." e from on of the wholedfamda on of medicine, in an absurd k ghuman life Dr. Alvin Young, �' head of the USDA's office of flatio that kind of absolutism inPone[ed one,i the, n ar says the coats r such a outra- nation-foremost advocate of Icw-pesticide,rote "B a nn°� could be bigger than we think: grated-pest management n We farmthg, Steve that we have tthish�°faed on the Presumption Woods. an apple grower in West Lebanon, NH. H surplus and we can Right after NRDC's attack an Afar, he invited. afford fait back production. But that surplus amage doesn't eaiat any mare. if we wipe out pesticide to come back up and nee the d she'd done. use we wu8 slash US food output by at least 40 "We showed her one packing house after anoth. percent. and raise toad prices by a like amount. erjammed to the rafters with unsold fruit,and one is fact,the USDA estimated that a ban on just farmer after mother wiped out by the'6o Minutes' three chemicals—tnaane herbicides on com and Program.She was dearly very,distressed at what alachiur and memlachlor on soybeans — could she saw." But it was not Hathaway's fast trip, cost US consumers over$16 billion in crop lasses Woods told us he met with her repeatedly over a and higher prices.Said Young: "Organic farming Period of nearly a year showing her how Also,was is fine for age or tw"r even lPacre plats,but for used primarily to strengthen stem growth and commercial,low-labor input hutting we couldn't Prevent much harsher insect spraying: "Six provide the food for this country's needs.The pho� weeks before the '60 Mnutes'shag we met with his about food chemicals could easily be discs- ___._ - .. _- trous to our entire food production industry." Hathaway,Meryl Steep,and her group, and the What really worries Dr.Hart"is how rapidly we CBS producer, David Gelber, and told them not are increasing our ability to identify ever smaller only about Alar's critical role in lowering pesticide Ievelsofrisk.Take the recent withdrawal of Perri- use, but the 1977 Nosegay on Alec had been din- er bemuse they fond 35 parrs per billion of ban. credited. They told us in effect go jump in the une.Fifteen years ago we couldn't even detect 35 `/ lake." parts per billion.Now we identify 10 to the mmus- 15. That's one pan per quadrillion. That's the Wood charges that"this t make less s cal equivalent of filling the entire Grant Lakes, St. removal . the EPA will just make fond less safe, (mace Riven,and Bay of Fundy with gin and not more. For example, EDBCs ere absolutely putting a single drop of vermouth in it"With such essential[o us a9 an agent against early seas. n exquisite measurements,ram has become a van- taking away, the ED infinitesimal, where till windups an ishing concept We will find some risk—however ing no.-existent m c i moreei itens we will windup Mein infinitesimal—in everything. inn to use much more intense mite environmental p later i- Canadian scientist William Clark likened this aeriong comid season.It elssoundeNRDC and other process to the Inquisition, which "became the agement compinUy.The NRDC and other groups growth industry of its day,offering exciting work, are forcing as hell-bent in the wrong direction." rapid advancement, and wide recognition to its They are also driving Secretary Yueter to un- Professional and technical workers. Its creative characteristic levels of frustration: It's all so and energetic efforts to create a witch-free world stupid.But we have been doing it to ourselves for unearthed dangers in the most unlikely places;the years while the rest of the world watches. The rates of witch identification, assessment, and British have decided not to ban EDBCs because evaluation soared.By the dawn of the Enlighten- they found there was really no health risk in. meat,witches had virtually been eliminated from volved.British science is at lean as sophisticated Europe and North America. Crop failures. din as ease.and general misfortune had not. And more Thaatt is by the British don t even try to write than half a million people had been burned at the "bright lute standards" into the law, on As sense,"De stake largely for'crimes they committed in some,s Dr."but allow far regulatory common A Dr.Ronald}Ian warns,'•There is scadam one else's dreams.' en- '•The harder the Inquisition looked, the bigger tat incompatibility between writing law and doing its any, the stronger its motivation, the more science.Blacksmman law deals in absolutes and witches it discovered.In witch hunting,acctsation in definitions. But science is an evolving beast, was tantacaount to conviction. The principal tool constantly changing as new knowledge is an. for identifying witches was torture. The inquisi- goired. Unless You make laws compatible with tars justified a would a stringent rely dan a the science, a rime Big gGrem.di society is doomed." grounds that rt would bee defectively dangerous Yet the care another. Green is one,bright-line regulators stun- for a real witch to escape detection. gird after another. The only way,ragWcultu can •'lion today?What is not risk with a parts-per- save their necks y to put Calg us in oagriculture at trillion ten can always Th exposed to a partsle is risk. It is already hurting e ui Congress. billion examination-...The act stopping role is Even now,Sen.Edwaon do Reanedfully t write the discovery investigator an-for his funds. Many of the Bush administration down successfully it write a of the investigator cedu his funds. Many of the bright-line ligbl standard on pesticides that will define risk-assessment procedures used today are logi- ineglumifrisk"as no more rhea me st la million in - tally indistinguishable from those used by the In- un temrn for language preempting Pate iniga- quisitum." rives like Bug Green. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS , &/ 'Y"�- Name of Pager Secdcm Page Oam Subject There is,and can be, only one purpose for such regulatory overkill: Deliberately to shut down the US economy, and force a halt to economic and human development as we know it. H you think this extreme, consider the keynote speaker picked by Sen.Albert.Gom to address his April Imerparliamentary Conference on Climate Change.It was Bratil's Secretary of the Eoviron- ment Jose Antonio Lutm aberger. who told an en. thusiastic audience that"The worst and most dan. gerous aspect of our modem economic thinking is the dogma of the necessity for continuous econom. ic growth.Even the idea of sustainable growth is a contradiction in terms." He said the "socalled developed couctries are really overdeveloped," and because it is impossible to extend ourway of life to the undeveloped countries, "then there is something basically wrong with that way of life." The enthamastic applause he received m that ballroom of Washington's J.W.Marnot Hotel from an audience of people now making policy for you and me for generations to come should t8ake us all up to the dominating agenda of flat-Earth environ- mentalism which ties at the heatt of California's --� Big Green Killer Watermelon. Everyone,including Californians,likes to laugh at the cultural zaniness of this state. But if Big Green passes, the rest of the nation will pay a fearsome price for their own fruits and nuts and everything else in between, and the biggest costs will be paid by average- and lowerAncome citi. zens. That cost might be worth it if the dangers they address were real and well documented.Sad- ly, they are neither. - _ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .1 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 1e 2w9 AVENUE September 12, 1990 Meoxelzl i MN V4 V.C MRNM 921M4127 nln 9ez-zm Staff Remwrt Replacement/Upnrade of Northern Talecomm Phone Switch Fauiruent In mid-1984, the Joint Boards approved the purchase of Northern Telecoom phone equipment to replace the phone ccnpany cyst® then used by the Districts. This reconmeldation was made after an extensive survey conducted by an independent telephone consultant. For many reasons, this system now needs to be replaced or upgraded. When the system was installed in 1985, there was a 75% growth factor allowed. That growth has already been realized with addition of personnel plus required phone capacity dedicated to cenputer miles and fax machines. In addition to the fact that our exieting system is at capacity, there are other technological shortcomings. For example, we are not currently able to accommodate an integrated voice mail and automated attendant package. These features would save staff time lost to "phone tag," would increase the speed with which incoming rolls are handled, and would improve personal operator assistance when that -is required. A study of third-party add-on packages showed - ' that objectionable and unavoidable implementation problems would result from any system not fully integrated with the Northern Telecom equipment. one of the benefits of the Northern Telecomm system is a feature called "least-cost-routing." This allows the PBX/switch to automatically search to find the least costly option for outgoing calls from a selection of WATTS lines and other routes, thereby optimizing our telephone circuitry and reducing our costs. We have reached the maximum number of circuits for this feature and, thus, many of our calls do not receive this benefit. Specifically, none of our fax or modem lines are eligible for this savings, as they are all on direct lines outside of the PBX/switch. A feature of newer equipment which would allow the use of "least-cost-routing" with fax and modem lines is direct-inward-dialing (DID). This world allow callers to reach fax machines and modes without going through the operator, thereby continuing to make automated incoming cells possible. outgoing calls, however, would now go through the PBX/switch and would he able to take advantage of "least-cost-routing." Use of the PBX/switch for these outgoing calls would also enable us to include them in our can accounting and monitoring process. Another potential use for DID is to assign individual phone numbers to certain employees or locations so that calls to these numbers do not go through the operator. Again, outgoing calls from these numbers would still enjoy the benefit of least-call-routing and be subject to the call accounting and monitoring process. Replacement/Upgrade of Northern Telecom Phone Switch Equipment Page 2 �► September 12, 1990 A final, and future, benefit of new equipment concerns phone service to Plant No. 2. The two plants are currently connected by General Telephone Company (GM) lines. These GfE lines have been a sauce of m uW problems in the past stemming front the need to coordinate installation and repairs,, the quality of the Lines and the capacity of the system. For example, operating the recently completed Ccean Cutfall Booster Station was delayed for months after the completion date because telephone Lines were not available. Interplant communications are becoming more and more critical as computerized monitoring and information systems require data Lines between the plants. New eg iprent will allow us to use future fiber optic lines to be installed in the Interplant Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9, when they are available, with the purchase of some additional equipment at that time. Job No. I-9 is currently under desgin with nm,str,untirn projected to begin in April 1991. After marry discussions and considerable analysis and review, staff has solicited a proposal from Northern Telecom to modify our equipment to provide increased capacity, added features, and to also allow for future improvement of the interplant communications. The proposed upgrade would utilize much of our existing system, including the individual phones, thus preserving our investment and minimizing disruption and training requirements and would add a nodular equipmentsystem allowing incremental increases in � future. The proposed maximum initial price forrequired the package reired tomeetD.istrict needs, including phone voice nail and automated attendant, and to allow for future expansion, is $126,200 plus tax (see Exhibit 1). Additional costs will be incurred in the future as more lines are required and as the interplant cm,m,nirations prcbl® is able to be corrected. Preliminary negotiations indicate that the initial pricing may be reduced by as much as 20% once staff has authority to act and to close a purchase. EC.RP18/EC1.09.01 9/12/90 E}0D".BIT 1 NOEUMB I TMECOM OPTION 61 UPGRADE FOR SL-1 MS QUMTiCN FOR CSDOC Item Description Price 1. - NP Option 61 Upgrade for Slrl $ 84,500.00 M switch including Voice Message and Autcmted Attendant 2. Intelligent Peripheral Module $ 16,300.00 (to house item 3 below) 3. "2500" card sets, quantity 2 $ 10,000.00 and Digital card sets, quantity 2 (This will allow an immediate addition of 64 lines. ) 4. Digital Trunk Interface $ 7,400.00 (This wi11 allow us to install T-1 will enable us to handle 24 trunks per card. Our present Analog Trunk Interface only allows us to handle 2 trunks per card.) 5. Power converter and backup $ 4,500.00 power supply 6. Call Accounting/System Upgrade $ 3,500.00 Total Maxmm= Cost Before Tax $126,200.00 < COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS EI ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA I WAA ELUS AVENUE Pa BOX$127 FMWAiN VALLEY.pUEaRNia 92728.8121 01M%2.xu September 20, 1990 STAFF REPORT New Public Information Video Background "2020 VISION," our 30-year plan of action for wastewater management outlines the Districts' public health and environmental protection program to the year 2020. It integrates research, facilities planning, environmental analysis, toxics control , water conservation and reclamation, sludge reuse, other innovative programs, and financial planning into a single, unified approach. Planning for the successful implementation of any program has to include public support, which can best be achieved through information and public education efforts. Our relevant goals, as outlined in 112020 VISION," are to continue community outreach activities that include emphasis on marine monitoring, sludge reuse, water reclamation, water conservation, and waste minimization. Our plan that was developed to implement the public education goals of 1-2020 VISION" includes new brochures, a speaker's bureau, tours, presentations, and production of a new video on the Districts. The video would be shown to all �./ those who visit the treatment plant sites for a tour or presentation; it would be available for presentations to community and special interest groups; and it would be provided to all of the local cable television stations. It would also be used in our presentations to legislators and regulatory authorities. The video should have a three-to-five year life. Selecting Consultants to Produce the Video We began planning for the new video production by advertising for two weeks for qualified video producers. We also sent letters to known video producers soliciting information on their qualifications. We received four responses to our direct mailing. Of those four, three were considered qualified, and were sent requests for proposals (RFPS), a copy of which is attached. The RFPs requested information for a 13-15 minute video that met the following objectives: --We want our constituency to know who we are and how their wastewater program is being managed. --We want to assure the public we are doing an effective and efficient job of managing their wastewater while protecting public health and keeping ocean waters safe for swimming and fishing. -1- t � " --While our primary focus is on protecting water quality, we also want to communicate our concern with air quality, land resources and energy conservation. Therefore, we want to convey a holistic environmental awareness that influences all that we do. --We also want to communicate that we are environmentally sensitive by directing our efforts toward reclamation, reuse and cross-media protection of all environmental resources. --We want to assure the public that we responsibly plan for future service needs to continue providing reliable and dependable service for existing and future residents, and for meeting increasingly stringent environmental standards.All RFPs were sent with the Districts' recent brochure, "Wastewater and Environmental Management," and a basic outline of the- information to be communicated in the video. We provided as much specific information as possible to enable a fair comparison. The three bids we received were very close: Video Pioneers Corporation (VPC) of Santa Ana $28,950 The Premium Group of Irvine, 32,925 PIX Productions of Santa Ana 33,425 +� Staff Analysis Due to the creative nature of a video production, it is very difficult to outline all of our expectations and specify all variables in order to make an objective point-by-point comparison between companies. Therefore, by necessity, a certain amount of subjective evaluation enters into the analysis of the proposals. For example, the RFP outlined the need for aerial video footage of the treatment plants. VPC budgeted $1,300 for two-and-one-half hours of helicopter rental and use of a stabilizer lens (to keep video footage from "jumping" around). The Premium Group, however, budgeted $2,475 for four hours of helicopter time and use of a Tyler mount (another instrument to stabilize video footage), as well as costs for required permit fees, (VPC did not intend to acquire a permit), and equipment. Thus, The Premium Group's budget for aerials is $1,175 higher because they planned on getting a permit, they estimated needing more time (although in staff's estimation they probably wouldn't use more than two hours, which would result in a credit to the Districts) and also because the Tyler mount is the more expensive, higher quality instrument. -2- `/ The two production companies work differently in acquiring their support crews. VPC does everything in-house. They have their own camera crews, computer graphic artist, editing equipment and personnel. In-house support results in lower costs for VPC, which is probably why their production costs are $1,600 less than The Premium Group's. The down-side of having in-house support is, in a world of rapidly advancing technolegy, VPC's capabilities become limited to using the equipment they have invested thousands of dollars on. They are also limited to using their in-house talents no matter what the project. The Premium Group, on the other hand, contracts out for all its support talent, except producers and directors. They are able to hire the best writers, camera crew, computer graphic support and editors using the latest in video technology, depending on the needs of any particular project. Because the quality is higher, the costs are also somewhat higher. The companies were also asked to propose the best approach for achieving the Districts" stated objectives. VPC submitted a simple proposal recommending a "video brochure." They suggested doing an off-camera narration and writing the script using the text from the Districts' recently released brochure "Wastewater and Environmental Management" and adapting it to a video narrative. Staff believes this suggestion lacks the creativity needed to tell the Districts' story in an innovative and interesting presentation, The Premium Group submitted a proposal that was more comprehensive outlining the intended goals and methods. They suggested a title or theme, 112020 VISION ... Clearly the Best Solution." In describing their approach, The Premium Group appears to have captured the Districts' sense of direction, quality and high expectations in focusing on the 112020 VISION" theme. They suggest using an on- camera talent to visually reinforce the message. PIX submitted a proposal that focused on interviewing employees as they tell the story of wastewater. Pix is well qualified to produce a high quality video, but was eliminated as the high bidder. RECOMMENDATION Staff has concluded from their analysis of the firms that The Premium Group has the superior proposal. Although, their cost is potentially $3,975 greater than the low bidder, it is clear that it will be more than offset by a much higher caliber video production that would better reflect the Districts' tradition and commitment to excellence. Staff, therefore, recommends authorization to contract with The Premium Group to produce a new video about the Districts in an amount not to exceed $32,925. CC/CC -3- A F COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS W ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 1O 4ELLIS AVENUE A0.60%912, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92]2&912) (7141962-2411 August 24, 1990 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL VIDEO PRODUCTION GOAL Our goal is to have a 13-15 minute narrated video production that communi- cates the image of our agency, which is conservative but responsive and responsible. The production is to look clean and professional, but not commercially flashy. OBJECTIVE We want our constituency to know who we are and how their wastewater is being managed. We want to assure the public we are doing an effective and effi- cient job of managing the county's wastewater while protecting public health and keeping ocean waters safe for swimming and fishing. While our primary focus is on protecting water quality, we also want to communicate our concern with air quality, land quality and energy conservation. Therefore, we want to convey a holistic environmental awareness that influences all that we do. We also want to communicate that we are environmentally sensitive by directing our efforts toward reclamation, reuse and protection of environmental resources. We want to assure the public that we responsibly plan for future service needs to continue providing reliable and dependable service. JOB REQUIREMENTS We require someone to write, film, direct, and edit the video with close oversight from our Pubic Information Office. About 30 percent of the required video footage is already available, the work will include searching through about 15 hours of available footage on VHS and 3/4-inch format. The production is to be shot on Beta Cam SP and be edited to a one-inch master. Camera work will require some on-site shooting of the treatment process and construction activities, aerial video footage of the two plants, and some off-site shooting of general community activites affected by our operation; sludge reuse (may require travel to Riverside and San Bernardino Counties); water reclamation activity (requires travel to Irvine or Long Beach); and marine monitoring tasks (may require two full-day shoots on a boat.) We would like the narration to be professionally produced. Background music should be acquired from available sound tracks, no original scores are necessary. The production will also require some computer graphic special effects. -1- �.s VENDOR SELECTION PROCESS & TIMELINE Our staff will be happy to meet with you to answer questions and do whatever we can to help you submit the best proposal possible. Proposals should be delivered to 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley; or mailed to P.O. Box 8127, Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127. Deadline for submitting proposals is Monday, September 10th at 5:00 p.m.. The proposal should include an explanation of your concept and overall approach, timetable, and cost breakdown. Attached you will find our latest general information brochure and a pro- posed outline of what we wish to have included in this video. If you have any questions or need additional information please call our Public Information Officer, Corinne Clawson at (714) 962-2411 ext. 213. CC/CC -2- COUNTY SANITATION DIMICTS AI ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA 10 EW2 AVEM V.QR"81V 1 W AN VALLEY.CMIWPNIA E2) 127 �/ mm22x.2An Outline for General Information Video I General Information A. Purpose B. Organization C. Funding D. Statistical Facts II History III Source Control A. Permitting B. Monitoring C. Enforcing D. Success of Program IV Treatment A. Preliminary B. Primary C. Secondary D. Quality Control E. Solids Handling/Disposal F. Ocean Disposal V Ocean Monitoring A. Water quality B. Benthic C. Trawling D. Rig fishing E. Results VI Water Reclamation A. Current Activities VII Conserving Energy _ A. Central Generation B. Heat Recovery VIII Protecting Air Quality A. Scrubbers/Domes � -1- X Future Direction A. 2020 VISION PLAN 1. Source Control a. materials substitution b. waste minimization 2. Water Reclamation a. increased activities . 3. Water Conservation a. public education 4. Sludge Reuse a. maintain quality b. research new reuse activities 5. Facilities Planning a. master planning b. serve communities needs c. meet environmental standards B. 2020 VISION SUMMARY CC/CC has/ -2- RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 10, 1990 - 7:30 P.M. D FUND 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE ' 9106/95 PAGE 1 , REPORT NUMBER AP43 1 _OW lTY fI0N RIRFR.*BFS OF GRANG9 cRuNfV / r CLAIMS PAID 09/L2/90 P03T7N6 DATE 09119190 WAP.LNT-NO-. VESIDOR RMBUNT AEBCA344tON -- 109208 A 6 6 INDUSTRIES 510.354.06 SCRUBBER TAN INLET INSTALLATION —SL6769 ABC+ALN 2M" ROAB�,m{YNG. 109210 NAG SYSTEMS -':4942.68 IHSTRIUffiMT PART 109211 ASR ANALYSIS $578.25 MECHANICAL TESTING —14%214 11I 108.0E REGISFXATION - L09213 ACTION-MARTIN SL60.65 HARDWARE 1C9214 AIR ACCESSORIES CO. $1.851.85 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES —40-9215--- A R-PNOT0­SCRVUES - 9" IA AERIAL PHOTOS FOR-DTS�ALOY-SORVHT 109216 ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY CO.. LTD. " .$15,424.31 MANHOLE COVERS 3> 109217 SAFETY SUPPLY AMERICA t1.e36.62 - SATRTY SUPPLIES m m —IBP218----ALPHAGAC "82.57 SPEOIAIRY-GASES, Z 1092 BOSCO INC. t/OR ALE RICAN SEALS $4.895.00 SEALS A GASKETS n 109220 4MERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY $277.12 CAMERA/FILM VALVE LVCONER CORPO 7i.44 VALVE N6Y�-661iER-RePAiAS-DIET-7-6-2 109223 APCO SYSTEMS A PR iNER CP - iL$808.84 VALVE --1 184223 A-PLUS SYSTEMS .BO8.B4 NOTICES 6 ADS 3 —109225 APPLE-ONE "'.93 74 TOOL ARV-SERVICES- 109225 ARUANET ICE 572.20 TOOL co 10922E AAATER SERVICES. INC. tl.572.20 DNIPO9M RENTALS Co —409228 RANDOLPH-AUSTIN CO. t$i6A8 LAU SUPPLIES 109229 AUTOOSHO AUSTIN C - ' f57.00 LAB SUPPLIES 109230 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CO. 'S510.00 TRUGR PAST r- —109231 0 9 TAHYDRTWINS-FGONTROv6-GO S159.Bl MECHANICAL PAR 'LC9232 B S T HYDRAULICS .633.05 GRIT RICAL PARTS r 1C9252 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $4U.633.95 GRIT REMOVAL L.O.10-29-90 d —109234 SACKFLOW PREPPhRDVENTION `189.00 MCMOMTESTINGIC6S 109235 BACKFLRY PREVENTION DEVICE - f$55.00 BRAKINGN TESTING (n 409736 BACKSTREET GALLERY f55.57 NSTRG p ---109237 BAXTEBA SCIENTIFIC PROG� M6.562_50 LAB P1-34-2,P1-17,P2-13-6— �„� 109239 BARTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS f3.5U2.39 LAB SUPPLIES -1 189268 BEOTAILE HUNT VESSON t3.d4B.02 REFUND USER AE¢ OVERPAYMENT 1 —199248 GOEATBETTER BUILD SCALE PRO057�-AR ib 6S650.00 LAW EQUIPMENT VICe6-6-31,5-]4- 109241 BETTE0.BOX SCALE PROD. 2145.00 LAB COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 109241 BLACK BOR COOP 5145.61 RAD UTEH HARDWARE —109242——BONA-NAOMTOR-SERVICE- $214.07 TRUCK PAPAIR- RTS . 109244 BON-N-RUES t214.07 TRUCK PART! 109249 BROWN f CALDYELL 94.804.25 LAB SCRVICES —109246 THE BU4-GALDMPL6--60M8U4L1NG-- "rS99.14 ELFINRIC SL68IVIC8S-P2-13-5-L,P2-33-3,1,45-�- 109246 THE BORNE NEERINT 320.1/ ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 109247 BUR NE ENGIN EERING CO. fl.l20.19 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES —109240----CAL-CHER TREE $146.75 PBTTY-OPLIES NBURSEIEN'1' --- 109249 CAL-CMEM SALES $510.00 LAB SUPPLIES IP9250 CALIF. ASSOC. OF SANITATION i510.00 REGISTRATIDN —1092 'AN BPC A . .. . 1 9252 R AROLLD ENGINEERS S4 .268.5 ENGINEERING SSSERVICES E-0V8S YAI-YH9 109253 CHISTINE I. CARp 91.134.80 COlE0T64 INPUT SERVICES BNT riFUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/06/90 PAGE 2 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 N "'V--SAULTAJ-LQN-044444CTLOF-ORANGE COUNTY rn CLAIMS PAID 09/12/90 POSTING DATE 09/12/90 JIABRA r NO- VENDOR 9Y_ ..CRZ VTLN 109254 CMARLES W. CARTER CO. $515.17 PUMP PART 2.. rr9rrl rn9M--N1CA-UO-- 9rcTrN e225.89 —TELBPBON6iYSTEN-MODIYICATIONS 109256 CHAMPION FENCE CO. '. $1.626.00 FENCING' 109257 CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC. - $568.40 PAINT SUPPLIES —14R252_ CHROME-CA ANKSH"T.-INC. .2"55 00 IBCIWN£CA1,-PARTS-RBPAIR-- ---- 109259 COAST AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION $53.18 TRUCK PARTS 109260 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT 2121.13 SAFETY SUPPLIES S37.540 MECHAN£CAL-88PA1R8 109262 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF $6.375.00. PUMP PARTS 3, 109263 CONNELL G.M. PARTS / DIV. f212.12 MUM PARTS m —109261 CONSOLIDATED--ELECT67CAL-DISTr— •11.406.A7 BLBCPRICSiIPYLIeS--- z 109269 CONTAINERIZED CHEMICAL DISPOSAL 1350.00 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL Cy 209266 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS $1.923.18 BLURPRINTING n 9aT rnnoDlNATEp_COU1R.-00. ilYf f3S O.OD— EQUPYNBNH63T;N: 109268 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $72.98 MUM PARTS 109269 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 1415.18 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES m --4682'0 ' ARRY-LURXLTRUCK-6-EQUIRNEUT------------------ 25.080.40 6LIIDUB-RSIBIVAL-M.0.7-11-90- 3 109271 DME. INC. f846.08 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 109272 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE $517.06 TIME 00 109271 ^•VIE IN rRUME1LTS. _lll n. LVSTRUMESM-PARTS 109274 DELTA fOAM PRODUCTS •''f 170.95 LAX SUPPLIES - 1 109275 DICKSONS $847.88 AIR CONDITIONER —4S9276-- ^ORAOO-ENJERRRISES.-IN C D . S92S r9A PWMY-NAINTBNANCE 6-HEYAIBB— -- r 109277 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $1.148.89 PAINT SUPPLIES r 169278 E.I.L. INSTRUMENTS. INC. f1.879.8T ELECTRIC PARTS —IOA279 EASINAN.-IN^ `n.35T+88 QFRCK-S Full C7 109268 EL TORO COMPUTER SOLUTIONS $25.00 COMPUTER REPAIRS 109281 ENCHANTER. INC. S9.600.00 OMAN MONITORING M.0J-I4-90 —109282-- -0006E-CONSTRU"ION-NEWS ----- S76.00-- AOVeRTLBBtOU1T -- .� 109283 LEEDS S NORTHRUP S997.25 INSTR ONE BY SUPPLIES 109284 JOHN B. FALKENSTEIN P.E. $3.699.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-6. 1-20 �9245 -€E06RAIrEKPRESS-COR.-. `166.00 eR-FREIGST C/0 109286 FERRELLOAS S22.95 PROPANE 109287 FILTER SUPPLY CO. I'S PUMP PARTS —409288- - --iINDLEY-AOHESIYE-S - -- '9.521.32---- -REFUND USSR ME OVERPAYMENT ---------- 109289 FISCHER 0 PORTER CO. $3.579.94 CELORINATION PARTS . 109290 FLUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $1.799.61 PUMP PARTS 1— 0929 --FOUNTAIN-VALLEY-CAKER` `9d. PALM — 09292 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT ,650.595E PAINT SUPPLIESPAR 109293 THE FORBDRO CO. f2.653.26 INSTRUMENTPARTS —L0929A -----GILT-AF-FULLERTON--- -----��-���---�-�-----s1S5.00 --WATER-0SE38 -- - 109295 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $263.71 BUILDING MATERIALS 109296 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $1.338.75 CHEMICALS —ID92AT `Aids-i-ISER6LAG5-1NSSALLEAS S46B.00 14BBRGW68-PABRICATIOK 109290 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $175.31 TELEPROME SERVICES 109299 GEORGE LEECH B ASSOCIATES $191.68 PIPE I N A FUND 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING GATE ' 9/GS/90 PAGE 3 \ r REPORT NUMBER AP43 GOUMTY-66 'ITAT-FGN-MISTR&STS-OF OR AGE GOVNTY _ A W _ CLAWS PAID 09/12/90 POSTING GATE 09/12/90 -{{ARRANT--N O. VENDOR ""T ^"'OII 109300 GIERLICH-MITCHELL, INC. S3.345.36 PTOB PARTS -1-9303 `-BEAT-WESTERN-REGLANAU N i2.800.8.0 -STREET-.WBPING-SERVICES , 109302 DON GREEK S ASSOCIATES $2,617.50 'ENGINEERING SERVICES 109303 HACH COMPANY 532.92 - LAB SUPPLIES -M930_ NARK-IN6T-0N-IODUSTRIAJrR4ASTiGS -903.0, GAUGE 109305 MATCH S KIRK. INC. $1.106.42 ENGINE PARTS 109306 S. A. HEALY CO. $126.305.60 CONSTRUCTION PI-35-I _409367---------44 C" ITT-PACKARD 338." BRRILB-SOPRLIBS 109309 HIGH VOLTAGE ELECTRIC $1.350.00 ELECfRICA1 PARTS 109349 HIL71. INC. $476.32 HARDWARE ITT --109310— MECHANICAL PARTS ,. Z 109311 HOUSE OF BATTERIES 51.010.91 BATTERIES C7 109312 R.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. $4.043.51 PAINT SUPPLIES n --10R313 TIT* OF-HUNT-IRGFO"FACH 02} 777 59 NA=_USE 109314 IND INDUSTRIES : S559.85 _ INSTRDTffi1'T HART 109315 TWA ENGINEERS $1,990.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-27-2 ITT -1093{6 -IMPEAd A4-WEN-CHEMTGAL 50% 97 ,'E.^oU3-9DARIDEJI.O.A-lAAO 3 109317 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS •$1,460.21 CONNECTORS # 109310 INGRAM PAPER $4.789.33 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES CO '09319----------4WZ%NA-TIUNA"ENSOR-TC 109320 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT - $301.52 WATER USE 109321 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP. S767.69 JANITORL SUPPLIES 309322 '.F.-JOHNSON-COMPANY •2 02 LAB &URPLI85 r 109323 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $195.03 ELECTRIC PARTS I- 109324 KANEN COMPANY 32.204.90 ELECTRIC PARTS d -LB9325 NEL.L4-SERVICES 51386 94 TFJSORARILSERVICES IC9326 HIMMERLE BROS.. INC. 568.94 GASKETS (q 189327 MING BEARING. INC. S2.656.78 RAISING SUPPLIES --j -109320 --MNAPP.--MAPSH,-JONES-b-DORAN 331-6A4 LEGAL n ICES-ONIVERSAL-CIRCUITS 109329 KNOB INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES S1.J53.25 TOOLS n 109330 VLADIMIR KOGAN 3SO.35 RILEAGE MUSE -i -1-09331--MARTIN-K0RDI6Mr-SR y2.560 B6 CONSFRTI=QWO SERVICES-5-35-" Cn 109332 LEAGUE OF CALIF. CITIES I S200.00 MEMEERSRIP DUES 199333 LEE A AD CONSULTING INGE. S61.0I9.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-33 -109339----LE-ROY- GAAN0ALL-2r ASSOC--S.966.-16 BIL8-0RTVLY"UnCES - 109335 LEWCO ELECTRIC CO. S5D5.20 TRUCE REPAIRS 109336 LIMITOROUE CORP. $821.35 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES -109337 --�,DDI-DOOR- i1�2�F1 REPTIND-USER-P6B-OV6RPAYMEO 109338 A.J. LYNCH CO. 341S.2D JANITORLAL SUPPLIES 109339 MPS S37.19 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES -109348- --"ADOMCO----- --- i10T.20 SERVICE-AGREEMENT---- - 109341 MALCOLM PIRNIE . INC. $1.860.77 ENGINEERING SERVICES H.0.7-12-89 109342 MARVAC ELECTRONICS S318.96 INSTRUMENT PARTS -'09343 -A�GHL-ORr-3ND. I F 353.-38 G LORINAFION-PARTS 109344 DON MAURER $2.350.00 OCEAN MONITORING CONSULTANT 109345 MCKENNA [NOR. A EQUIP. 66.409.16 PUT@ PARTS W FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/06190 PAGE 4 y REPORT NUMBER RP43 I NA4A04-OlSE4LAGTB-0f ORANGE COUNTY r (^CLAIMS PAID 09/1219O POSTING GATE 09112/90 OARRANT_N °ENDOS ----AMDA T-- raCBLRLIOM 109346 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. $1,606.22 SAFELY SUPPLIES .note urm ru r wem a rn- a06r- VALVE 109348 MICROAGE^COMPUTER STORES _ f79.69 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 109349 MICROSOFT f222.00 PUBLICATION .c^350 -NILLA LCV4LO"ERVSCE 173.00 ELEVATOR-XAINT¢NENCE 109351 - MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. s6R 4.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 109352 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL. INC. $92.44 PUBLICATION 10 OMUDHERY.I AAnR170R1FS tlr-T40 25 LAB sm1c 5 - 109354 MOTOROLA, INC. f296.41 INSTRUMENT PARTS _ n 109355 HEAL SUPPLY CO. %571.30 INSTRIDOUTI SUPPLIES 4l -IS9356 NELC0.RA000CTS 51.311.59 RBPUND-p68R-FEE-OVERPAYMERT--- - -- Fq 109357 NEWARK ELECTRONICS 1133.19 INSTRNBN! SUPPLIES Z 109358 Olt SYSTEMS CO. f29.944.82 CHLORINE M.0.2-14-90 3. icg -. .uE�J.......... t202 1` r�`CTRIr SUPPLIES y nE nw 109360 ORANGE BEARING• INC. 191.90 HARDMM 109361 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO, $1,150.55 FITTINGS -109362-- CSDOCM-SERY.FUN s415.94 PREMIUM AD .- 3 109364 CSDOC SELF-FUNDED RADICAL INS f100.030.00 PREMIUM ADVANCE 109364 PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF f30.00 SIESCRIPTION #I SAF11tES172NEN' ^- 9F R ER a 10936 PACIFIC BELL $ .09 TELEPRONE SERVICES 109367 PACTEL CELLULAR 951.29 CELLDAR TELEPHONE SRRVTC86 D -109368- -PA0MNOHRSON i125.O0 _ TRUISTBATION- ---.------ r 109569 PARTSTS UNLIMITED ' fJ 7.78 TRUCK PUTSr' 109370 PIMA SRO SYSTEMS. INC. $45.096.33 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.D.5-11-88 -y0937I POLAROID-CORPORAL T IN `30.1.4 CN1FM.8TTPLI - C 109373 POLY ENTERPRISES. INC. S369.19 SAFETY SUPPLIES N 109373 POLYPURE. INC. i13.173.T8 POLYM¢R9 N.0.1-I0-90.8-9-89 --109374 -FGRTER-BOILER-SERVICE.--INC.- 6468.OS-----BLBCIRIC-PARtB - - z• 109375 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE 5198.00 ICE 109376 PRODUCTION PLATING $250.00 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT �OPSI7 S"EJ+R OJEOTS-tOLUi30N-00. •O.86B.0O INSTRUHENTATION INSPEMON M.0.8-10-BB (/1 109378 OHS. INC. f346.62 COMPRESSOR PARTS 109379 QUEST INTERNATIONAL INC. f15B.13 INSTRUTENT PARTS -109580 --- ---RANCHO-SAOTTAGO-COLLEGC -.--- -f340.D 6- REGIST&3TION- ----- 109381 RED WING SHOES $203.92 SAFETY SHOES 109382 R.A. REED ELECTRIC f2.836.01 nECTRIC REPAIRS -10B3S1 EEMEOT-TEMP -4c318.a. THOORARY�ERVICES- 109384 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. $3.565.11 GAUGE/HARDWARE 109385 DETECTOR ELECTRONICS CORP. $283.19 INSTRUUUTC PARTS -109386 -----MOSEMOUNT/UNTLOC--- ---- ---H.659.81 - - - --INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES --- - ----------- 1093A7 RUTAN A TUCKER f5.271.91 LEGAL SERVICES BEATRICE/BUNE-WISSON 209388 RYAN-HCRCO f333.39 HARDWARE -109390 CORP. $150.0O MECBANIfA4ERPAiE` 1D9391 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. f132.80 PARSE CGENMER 109391 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTO f200.96 B.11 OCEAN MONITORING N.O.6-13-90 n F / 4 FUND 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/06/90 PAGE 5 ~ D REPORT NUMBER AP43 "ITS-0E-ORaNGE--68UN T V ^• CLAIMS-PAID 09/12/90 POSTING DATE 09/12/90 - LARA AN7 • VENDOR 4KM1Ul— D1SC.--7-IDM 109392 SEA COAST DESIGNS S2.2L3.78 OFFICE FURNITURE —109593 SMAMROCN-SURP4T i1..220 ST NGLR 109394 PACIFIC EXCHANGER 0 MACHINE 910,359.38 VAPORIM 109395 SMITH-EMERY CO. $2.123.50 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89 —IDSS06 `OFT "ARENGUSEJWESTERN-AEGUN- - --G.-.. OOfuv SGFTYARE- 109397 SOLAR TURBINES INCORPORATED 3816.47 IBCYARICAL PARTS 109398 SO. COAST AIR QUALITY $250.00 PERMIT PEES —30939` SOLLTJI-COAST-AIA-0UAL-I-TJ' Hy563.00 GBNR66 TGBT-FES"o 209400 SOUTH COAST DODGE $76.58 - mum PARTS 109401 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. $9.188.53 FOYER —/409402-- `O CAL---GAS CO -3r505.25 NATURAL CAS TTT 109403 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $8,299.01 DIESEL FUEL Z 109404 STAMEN 2, SPASSOFF. P.E. $4,320.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-34-2 d —1-9405, YF-WALLA%-INC. ".42i I. NSIAIA^PG:.:PKSG D 109406 STAR TOOL S SUPPLY CO. S786.29 . TOOLS - 109407 SICKNESS TREE SERVICE f925.00 TREE TRIIQRING SERVICES Ed -109400- ERL406-AAi 02.ON GRAFHIFB9PP6IR5 3 109409 SUMMIT STEEL $1.793.81 STEEL 109410 SUPELCO. INC. S848.25 LAB SUPPLIES 7t �541I lANT4NENT-A- AU- 430L.--1NC. -H.226.53- TOOLS W 109412 SYMANTEC CORP. $57.06 COMPUTER SOFTVABE 109413 TO SCIENTIFIC GLASS $1.792.97 TEST TUBES —109414--.- TAYLOR-WNN-MFG.-COMPANY 3586.51 ^BCFRIG-CART PAASS D 109415 TEKHAR COMPANY S497.16 LAB SUPPLIES 109416 THEO-TELLO-BUSCH. INC. $384.00 INSPECT CRANE r —1D941T XA4NGACAL 3i6-00 6A&SERVICE- p 109418 THURO L ASSOC. $2,958.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 109419 -ITS TROPICAL FISH f1.0T2.59 OCEAN SAMPLING SUPPLIES N —109420 —TRAVEL-TRAVEL '3.081.90 TRAVEL-SRRYICES- A 109421 H.O. TRERICE CO. S1.193.87 INSTRUMENT PARTS it9421 TRUCK B AUTO SUPPLY. INC. $857.82 TRUCK PARTS /7 —209424 UNOCALU CNE{t-6-SON.-FNG —F1.24T.2i GASOLINE �PABT 109425 UNOCAL f168.35 GASOLINE N 109426 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE i53.70 PARCEL SERVICES —109426--- VMR-SGIORPORAT 3.39907 LAB-SDPPLIPA 109428 VALLE CORPORATION 5328.48 REGULATOR PARTS 109428 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. f6.398.48 IIARDYARE —109430 —VERTEX-SYSTEMS -i4$549.51 OMPUTSAFETY -- 109431 VILLAG INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $314.77 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 109431 VILLAGE NURSERIES 4224 47 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES —309912 �----CAPL-Y0.RREN i-CO. ---5224.36 -�N6URAHCE-GLAINS-ADIfIdIBTBATOR-- 109433 WEST COAST ANALYTICAL SKY. 6510.00 LAB SERVICES 149434 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY $439677.47 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-9-89 —1654d0 YEROX-GORP. 81-1.84 GOP EO-L8A6E- ----------------- --7OIAL-CLA IN S-PAID-09/12/00--s9d9i.535_i 2-- ----- ' D � I i VI i FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 09/06/90 REPORT NUMBER AP43 y COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY errs-eelR„pp/,x2(,9^ ^eT• 09/12/9O (n SUMMARY ANGwT Ol OPER FUND 9 2.891.06 02 OPEN FUND 10.408.50 lea 00 — . 03 OPEN FUND _ 13.705.35 05 OPEN FOND 360.94 a•yga as 07 OPEN FUND 13,179.95 y 07 CAP PAC FUND 659.35 OPER-FUND- •a ----_ G01414 OPER FUND 48.62 0 /lf CAP PAC FUND $0.7375 _ /667 OPEN FORD^T 3,359.07 -- �"' 07614 OPEN FUND 9.03 m 1S-OPea-FDNO °•L.U2.70 3 CORY 279.608.30 S.F EBAI.TE INS./ S.F. LIAR INS. FUNDS 100.224.16 naa, n. ne•a,a. wG .,a_a9B ,• CO � i L1B7,sss.lx r r v FUND( 9199 - JT DIST YORKINN CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/20/9U PAGE 1 py REPORT NUMBER AP43 "GE "^UNIT F� '^CLAIMS PAID 09/26/90 POSTING DATE 09/21/10 �IMR4Ni-ND� VENDOR-- NT ^°SORT°TIOq - 109453 AALR&R i95.00 REGISTRATION kB9-054 AB- I -"ER ORR "B S6 BLISLDING-NATSRSALS 109455 AT S T - $484.58 ..`LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICE 109456 AERO TECH SURVEYS. INC. $2.205.46 '. PHOTO SURVEYING �57-- A:.R GO- D UPP" INC "04.b' �VACUUM-Pump 10945E AIR PRODUCTS S CHEMICAL INC. $45.898.00 06M AGREEMENT-OEY. GEN SYST. H.0.8-9-89 109459 SAFETY SUPPLY AMERICA t13.06 SAFETY SUPPLIES —10946bALdLO-SERVILE . . . . BTBR-REPAIR 109461 NORCO INC. &/OR AMERICAN SEALS 113,098.13 =.HARDWARE 109462 AMERITECH $97.75 <.:COPIER LEASES m —iR9463— A•"•-9LL-CORPORAN-0N 7-695... -BASIN-PARTS •71 IC9464 CITY Of ANAHEIM 3425.598.37 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.0.12-30-86 2 109465 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION 123.256.J0 SEWER REPAIRS DIST 7 7 •^^ 88J9 ALUF03ZNG-SUBRLEES n 109467 APPLE ONE 31.663.24 - TEMPORARY SERVICES 109468 ARATEK SERVICES. INC. - $2,792.93 "UNIFORM RENTALS T 109469 'SSOGFAT-I-0IY&OMEI148 TM'TO R6 6 T3 676.6E EB 4AL$DBNTAL-INS—AOMINISTMTORS 3 109470 AURORA/HYOROMATIC PUMP CO. $518.26 PUMP PART 109471 AYARDS&TROPHIES $21.09 NAME PLAQUES 3E — iA9472 :4LG.^N-^�BFOSAL-SERV.---- 12741 785.6E .^.I1'--REMOVAL-NA.30-28-90 00 109473 BANK OF AMERICA 53.152.17 SANE CARDS - 1 109474 P.Y. BAROTTI AND ASSOC. f6.197.50 CONSTRUCTION SERV. P1-34-2,P2-37,P2-23-6 1094-75- 8.-B ATEMAN R85.BO DBFBRRED­GOHP-DISTRIBUTION —- n 109476 BARTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS 12.492.52 LAB SUPPLIES r 109477 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES, INC. St.050.00 CAR WASH TICKETS r —309430 NOYAAO-0LBViNS t7GJ ]L DBSERRBD-COMP-0ISTRIBUTION C7 109479 SOLER RADIATOR SERVICE f215.66 RADIATOR REPAIR N 109480 BRENNER-FIEDLER & ASSOC.. INC. $499.38 MECHANICAL PARTS —109CH- .BROWN-"9ALOYELL •-.60"U E,AB„ERVICSS - A 109482 BROWN & CALDWELL CONSULTING S4U.491.72 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19 -� 109463 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES. INC. S6.744. )0 SURVEYING SERVICES RES 88-71 109404 GARY G IT O Ef.D ".229 2' PET�H-REIMBURSEMENT 109485 C.O.S.R.A.COMPLIANCE SYS - &I8T.00 REGISTRATION Cn 109486 CPT CORP.. / SUMMIT SOLUTIONS $95.00 COMPUTER CLASS REGISTRATION —i99 87— S comPJh Y 6494.-94 PPBIONT 109488 1990 CYPCA CONFERENCE S530.06 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 109489 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH. INC. $54.39 LAB SUPPLIES io9i90 S U+O'.....A-F-'.L-TRITION SN.Jfi��LTSRS 109491 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $561.509.68 ENGINEERING SERVICES I-9,P3-34, J-15 109492 CHRISTINE T. CARR S315.50 COMPUTER INPUT SERVICES —iO949}— OEN4EL-EOMNUNICkTIONS-GVSi64- "84.4I "618PHONE- SYSTBH-MODIFICATION&-- 159494 CENTURY PAINT $172.98 PAINT SUPPLIES ' i O9495 CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC. f1.378.14 PAINT SUPPLIES/GREASE 6 OIL -- -_— ID9495 CHngtft EVRON U.S.A.. Ir11.6. 328.40 MBGHAti1OAI.-RSPAIAB 169497 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT •&63.25 FIRE EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 139498 COLE-PORNER INSTRUMENT CO. S44.35 LAB SUPPLIES t✓ FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST MORNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/20/90 PAGE 2 �y REPORT NUMBER AP43 N CLAIMS PAID 09/26/90 POSTING DATE 09/26/90 vF uD Y ♦Y'I IUT - nFSf CTPTT ON 109499 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF $2.741.25 MECHANICAL PARTS PUT R-SSRVICBS 109501 CONARO-S PHOTOGRAPHY $223.13 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 109502 CONNELL B.M. PARTS / DIV. $236.85 TRUCK PARTS eegy enLi314TE0.TLEHTRICAI AI-T `9w968.3] gL6@lW;E�UPPLI86 169504 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO 53.378.75 CHLORINE M.O.10-17-87 109505 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS 1594.08 BLUEPRINTING —Sy3506 nnRII1N0.TE0-E0U1R.--CD- INC <3en-'n 64UIFN8NT�SSSNBGY - 109507 COSTA" MESA AUTO SUPPLY $955.90 - " TRUCE PARTS y 109508 COUNTY YNOLESALE ELECTRIC - '52.790.20 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES [D —10E569 -'O0.V-LUR-T-I-TR UCS-t-FALLIR MEAT '24.22D.Il^_ 'BLUDGS-REMOVAL-M.O_7-1-I-90- �' 109510 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $260.00 7-135 SURE ANNEX FEE Z 109511 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 5250.30 7-134 9Hg ARNBX FEE y —1095 8 8B8 ANNEX 8EE__ 109513 ONE. INC. 51.716.69 HARDNARB - 209514 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE $415.93 ' TIRES ---149516-- -ANEA-{ORRO0.AS•nu <lyg 0,R_ E4U;PMBN9L-RBNTALB -. 3 109516 OECD $244.10 TOOLS 109517 DEZURIK AND/OR CS CO. $1,340.09 VALVE PARTS 9! eayS n.PTL m°n .SSDLL FN4'ING « 109519 SYCON CORP. 969.51 INSTRUMENT PART I 109529 DISCO PRINT COMPANY 5136.19 HARDWARE _109521 ^TSROSABLEJIAS.TE 4YSTEAS.--INC- <..can_Sc ;n`STRUNBNT . IC9522 DORADO ENTERPRISES. INC. $16.627.74 PLANT MAINTENANCE R REPAIRS f- 109523 OUNMEL BROS. MACH MOVING $1.610.00 SPACE RENTAL J-19A ---952i- ^"AAD3-CU ° �117..7T PA;NT-SUPPLF88 C 109525 E.I.L. INSTRUMENTS. INC. $310.42 ELECTRIC PARTS 109526 ENA SERVICES. INC. 52.547.04 ENGINEERING SERV;CHS P2-44, J-23-2 109528 EASTMAN. 4 `1.591.00- —OFFICE SUPPING--------- .Z�l 209529 EASTNAN. INC. 51.591.19 OFFICE SUPPLIES 309529 ELGANALYSIS. INC. f425.90 OCEAN MONITORING -- 531 CHANTER, 801 INC. ••00.-00-- OCKAANIGAITORIN - T�jl 209531 ENCHANTER. ALES f2 s256.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.3-14-90 ]09532 ENGINEERS SALES-SERVICE CO. S56.BB PUMP PARTS —109533---E4RSHALL FAIRRE - ---SST$178.00 DEFERRED CO P DISTRIBUTION --- 109534 MARSH ALL ALKENSS .225.00 DEFERRED CONP ERG. J-7-I, I D9535 JOLN B. FALSENETEIX P.E. T3.it`00 CONSTRUCTION BERG. J-7-4, J-20, J-17 e.6- •DERAL EXPRESERY7-` 00 £IRRBRS 109530 FEDERAL EMPRESS CORP. f$34.40 AIR FREIGHT 10953P. FERRELL6AS 319.93 PROPANE —149559--FIRE MASTERLY-COS — -- -,528-86--- SAFEWNAT;ON-PARTB-- ---- -— 109540 FIRE MASTER 51.528.94 SAFETY SUPPLIES 109541 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE l2.990.00 TITLE LITIGATION GUARANTEE --L69543 -FLEXIBLE S K PARTS FLEXIBLE SYSTEMS $455.82 TRUCE PARTS 109544 FLICRIM6ER CO. i807.73 VALVE FUN( 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/20/90 PAGE 3 fA REPORT NUMBER AP43 I W CLAIMS PAID 09/26/90 POSTING D0.TE 09/26190. LIAR RANT--NO VENDOR 109545 FUME GOADS COMPANY $252.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES 10954T FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $940.87 - PAINT SUPPLIES 109548 FOX ENTERPRISES $1,825.00 SAFETY CONSULTANT - �&49 '"OROGO , N', R*R*rMS S656-75 INSTRUMENT 109556 FRANCE COMPRESSOR PRODUCT $4.785.12 - HECHANICAL PARTS 109551 A.F. FREY s105.00 DEFERRED COHP DISTRIBUTION —.00582 G:.I7AN1r6,iNS Nme 109553 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. 56.493146 - `TELEPHONE SERVICES D 109554 GEORGE LEECH 6 ASSOCIATES $1.026.19 INSTRUMENT PARTS m —109655 HAS GOMPA IV 86" "3 --TICME m 109556 FRED A. HARPER s1.495.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION z 169557 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS f671.04 GAUGE C7 a —14 a IN 109559 MAULAWAY CDNTAINERS ,'$2.340.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 109560 P.L. HAWK CO.. INC. $906.10 FILTERS m a99561 MIME-A RRE•A t06 00 MEE�NS . 3 109562 HILTI. INC. $247.94 CONNECTORS 109563 HI-YAY SAFETY RENTALS INC. $1.496.00 SAFETY EQUIPMENT RENTAL 00 '^"864----.-^ERW4" fi" ^ iuCHANZCA7rPART IOSS65 DONALD D. MONOMICHL 5300.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 1 109566 HOUSE OF BATTERIES $233.58 BATTERIES n —;-09so R.SrNUSKES-CO..--ING. '207 R2 PAINT- ... F- 109568 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STAMP f27.64 RUBBER STAMPS I- 109569 IND INDUSTRIES $559.85 INSTRUMENT PART —.v96i0 {�A- LL:T.EE OINEERii aB RVICBS C7 109571 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $55,899.23 FERROUS/FERRIC CHLOR. M.O.4-11-90r11-8-89 N 189572 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS s722.76 CONNECTORS ---"9573 -1 GA&M-PAPER •'T002.92�ANITCAIAI SUPPLIES A 109574 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. 6122.57 TRUCK PARTS 1C9575 INTERNATIONAL SENSOR TECH. $2.339.13 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES cGOs:6 -MCI; WEi-T[Ru "`.�- :R�-e..,.-. 42.3LJ" 0ANTTORTA*—SUPPLIES Intl 149577 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. . s915.70 INSTRUMENT PARTS 109578 A.F. JOHNSON COMPANY s35.37 LAS SUPPLIES —189579 ..OHNS40ME-SUPPLY ELE�S - 109580 KAMAN BEARINGS 6 SUPPLY $9.559.30 INSTRUMENT PARTS 109581 KAMER COMPANY s560.61 HARDWARE 169582 NEG..AN A ASS0CIATES ".049.-76 UORKBRB�BMP-ADMINISRATION-Ess 109583 KELLY SERVICES $1.596.82 TEMPORARY SERVICES 109504 KING BEARING. INC. s1.437.26 MECHANICAL PARTS 109566 —THEEKNOX CO 'S.-09d.i2-- GEOTECHNICAL-ESRVIC88 109-87 THE INOX COMPANY f78.13 CONSTRUCTION SUPPLIES 109587 MARTIN KOROICK. SR 32r242.11 CONSTRUCTION SHRVICEe 5-35-1 —109588 cA �-IRERTHRU• •- L.25 -INSTRU ART- 109589 LEEOS L NORTHRUP .094.60 MECHANICAL SUPPLIBS 109590 LIMITOROUE CORP. f1r099.60 MECHANICAL PARTS to _ W FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST VORK106 CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9126/90 PAGE 4 REPORT MONGER AP15 t CLAIMS PAID 09/26/90 POSTING GATE 09/26/90 - u0 uEN .' . 109591 K.P. LINDSTROM, INC. S7.713.57 CONSULTING SERVICES H.0.10-14-87 iDd`+ - P-PARTS 109593 LORAIN PRODUCTS $320.00 SERVICR AGREEMBHT 109594 NBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL - $3,919.22 OCEAN SAMPLING W9 4 >-� PHOTOGRAPHZL BEAVIEBS - 209596 MAINFRAME SERVICE INC. $480.20 INSTRUMENT REPAIR 109597 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS. INC. 9371.89 WATER TEST KIT LOBS VAC ELECTRONICS 54.07 INSTRUMENTSUP 109600 MATT - ELECTRONICS i154.B7 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES n 109600 MATT - CHLOP. INC. iB r.11 7G VALVES/CHLORINATION PARTS G1 _109601 •OLORS •31 de PU14P TINr PAR fYl 109603 MCKENNA ENGR. 6 EQUIP. st.933.04 PUMP PARTS z 109603 MCMASTER-C pRR SUPPLY CO. f1.122.23 BUILDING MATERIALS Y7 n SNOMAS R NFI TON `>'>-'^ BNPLOY86-MI-LRAGH m 10960 MICROAGE COMPUTER $2,659.72 COMPUTER PARTS - 109606 MICA OA6E COMPUTER STORES $962 - f952.62 - COMPUTER 80Pf91ARR •^667 u•^""^ uEG.-CO^..P�. SL.05) 30 SftL BR-ItUTION-PAAT6--- 3 109608 MILLAR ELEVATOR SERVICE 53.911.66 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS # 109629 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO. $3,012.63 SAFETY SUPPLIES n R RRMENT C0 ..A-B^ g6B6T -Rl PARTS oo 189611 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES $4,095.00 LAB SERVICES I 109612 MOORE PRODUCTS CO. $152.69 INSTRUMENT PARTS ^^613 ROORE�TABER NG >-aOD.00 EINSBRIIW1 BRVICRS n 1096" MORGAN CRANE CO.. I4C. `S1.493.75 CRANE RENTAL r 109615 MOTION INDUSTRIES. INC. 63r892.39 MECHANICAL PARTS ELL.0 ec89.45 CELLULARCHARGERS 109617 NOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICES t86.63 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES N 109618 MUTON AMERICA, INC. t8B.63 OFFICE MACMINE "PAI" —I —104619 _41"IONAL-COACH-CORPORATION '.262.33 VAN----VANPOGL- ---------- .� IG9620 NATIONAL LUM9ER > S137.29 HARDWARE 109621 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES. INC. $7.437.50 VACUUM TRUCE SERVICE •4^`22 0&AL-SURBI4--CO.— "33-6^ 11:STRUMRNT-SUPPLIES----- ,[/0 109623 NENARK ELECTRONICS f10.70 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 109624 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 6T.10 WATER USEAGE —109625-- 1'ORCAL_CO4TAOLS>-TNC+ `1.146.21 MECHANICAL-PARTS --- --- 109626 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES f403.32 SAFETY GLASSES 109627 THE ONMART CORP. S59.65 INSTRUMENT •>0 UK-- E11S CO --------------4.q 7, CHLORINE-M-G.2-14-9D 109629 ORANGE BEARING. INC. $819.31 MECHANICAL PARTS 199630 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY $403.06 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES •10—19632 $971 963 ^RANGE-COUNTY-AWOICARIS-CO«- ------ . TRUCK-PARTS- -------- ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. 6911.6161 HYORIC ACID 109633 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY CO. 5118.58 GROUNDCOVUNDCOVBR 109635 ^RANGE-OVERHEAD DOOR 189636 ORANGE SERVICE DOOR COMPANY $778.09 DOOR REPAIR 109636 OXYGEN SERVICE f778.09 BpBCL1LTF 0A88E8 FUN O■ 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/20/90 PAGE 5 - py ` REPORT NUMBER 043 I "CLAIMS PAID 09/26/9040STING PATE 09/26/90 �4ARRnN T-M6� "FNMA +^UN.T nrs�e�e�rnu 109657 COUNTY OF ORANGE $3.742.00 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES —1 VISA A, UR86-WBRNBRB-OBMPiNBUAANCB 109639 PEST S4.705.43-. MANHOLE INSPECTION DIST 11 10964U PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY 53.075.08 PUMP PARTS —50964i MAI RIC- RTC T.L.OSB BB INSTRUMENT-PARE 109642 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. f479.18 SAFETY SUPPLIES 209643 PACIFIC BELL $13.55 TELEPHONE SERVICES _149644 P,R41 UA41Nii In .;.1 .7 TRU2IFPARTB 109645 PEATY MARYICN. MAIN 0 CO. $5,009.00 AUDITING SERVICES M.0.3-9-80' y 109646 ROY PENOERGRAFT t445.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION GI —1"644 PHYSIC!AN+ -DGSK­RSFFRHNCE t0122� -EvuMCATIO m 109648 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS. INC. S44.953.65 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88 109649 PLAINS TRUEVALUE MARDVAAE 9639.61 HARDWARE n 109651 POWER ELECTED SUPPLY CO. $658.22 ELECTRIC SE SUPPLIES���-8� 189652 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $189.00 . ICE m P09688 Tll4e MOJE47b-SOLWii4N CO ......... YNSTRUNOTPATION-INBPBCTION-5h 9:B-k0-BB- 3 109654 PUMP ENGINEERING CO. f321•W1 PUMP PARTS 109655 QUALITY BUILDING SUPPLY $116.93 BUILDING MATERIALS Ki6 . ._c_ S Sen..� ENSINSERING-OBED 00 109657 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $1.950.61 TAKEN DISPOSAL I 109658 RATTRAP AND ASSOCIATES. INC. $1.991.04 ' PHOTO SURVEYING DIST 7 --S09659 EGVG INC 3,0 40.00 SLUDGE-REMVAIrM:0-2-10-B8 r 109669 R.A. REED ELECTRIC 9746.19 ELECTRIC PARTS r 109661 REMEDY TEMP $3.233.77 TEMPORARY SERVICES —i49662 THE_M&...•"•-FG-SU t7 109663 REMOLD POWER TRANSMISSION $99.66 MECHANICAL PARTS 109664 RICHARDS. WATSON S GERSHON $46,732.60 LEGAL SERVICES H.0.4-8-87 y —!09665 ROSEMOUNT--ANAL4+HAI -64I+92 'INSTRUMENT-REPAIR PC 109666 ROSEMOUNT/UNILOC S520.63 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 109667 ROYCE INSTRUMENT $245.62 INSTRUMENT PART --i8966a - " fR GA-A EhTAL INS. '"+0 OR.85 VAM-RBNTALr BUMMER-CREH Cn 109669 SS'V DIESEL $50.53 - TRUCE PARTS 109670 SAFETY-BLEEN CORP. $265.60 PARTS CLEANER 1096-71 `ANTA AKA-BLEC*RIG-N4TOP8 RS"5— ffLECTRIC CAAT-MOTOR- 109672 DOUG YARVIS 1,353.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 199673 SEA COAST DESIGNS $837.67 OFFICE SUPPLIES 3d9G?% 6—A--BYN }NG� -"88.2" _ OCEAN-MONITORINO 109675 SEARS. ROEBUCK S CO. •`f120.48 TOOL 109676 SENSOREK. INC. $363.39 INSTRUMENT. PART —1-09697— SMAMROGK-6UPPL-Y "1,313-B4-----TOOLS 109678 SHEPHERD MACHINERY CO. $545.29 ENGINE PARTS 109679 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC 52.125.0C PHYSICAL SEAMS —i996as !IT I ENEMY-G0• - " 00 BOIL�PB9TIN0-M:Oc6-19-89 169681 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $2,769.04 TOOLS 109682 SOFT WAREHOUSE/VEStERN REGIDN- $513.11 COMPUTER SOFTWARE b0 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/20/90 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP03 C31 CLAIMS PAID 09/26/9D POSTING DATE 09/26/90 . ` JYRRAN7 u eBDOBT DF9FRTPTTON 109683 SONNENSCHEIN. NATH S ROSENTHAL 545.688.11 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.6-13-90 !-09 a TTT eaTn_Tn PBRIIPT FBBG 109605 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY $260.09 PERMIT FEES 1096BG SOUTH COAST WATER 597.00 `.RENTAL'RQUIPMENT - 687 UERN LIX--EWSON-CO- e.309244_9s POWER - 109688 SO. CALIF. EDISON CO. $9,054.30 REPAIR DAMAGED POWER EQUIPMENT 5-29 109689 SO. CAL. GAS CO. $354.03 NATURAL GAS —309690 ens u LOOATB-GRB-LFNee-M:^..gym-�..; 2 27 109691 - SO. CALIF. WATER CO. $48.74 , :,WATER USEAGE n 109692 "SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. 5610.09 DIESEL FUEL G1 % TuWENT D-IW£RS[HJED INC `4 73S el RE PUNK I9ER-PSE�VERPAYNENT m 109694 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER 51.893.00 DRINKING WATER/COOLERS z 109695 STAMEN Z. SPASSOFF. P.E. $2,640.00 l7 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-34-2 n —�09696 eel TOOLS .. 969 APHIC STERLING ART - - 46.05 GR SUPPLIES 109698 09698 SUMMIT STEEL - SL2T7.41 STEEL ITT149699 "'N�'E=7-+."N NTRA�GROUNDS%68PING-IF.BrB-9-89 3 109760 SUPER CHEM CORP $1.046.75 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 109701 SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS $221.00 PUBLICATION # L69J02 ^^Mi1NEWTA6-AT LB W 109703 MA NIN TALEBI $553.22 MEETING EXPENSE - 1 209704 TAUBER ELECTRONICS 923.13 FREIGHT —I09305 NY 'a9-L 12 BLE._.___ _-.T-PARTS r 109706 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD S5.U97.52 VEHICLE LEASES - CARGO VANS r - 209787 TICOR TITLE INSURANCE 5600.00 TITLE INSURANCE lO4T TRAY EI —WE' a.Pnc_an TRAVBL-fl6RVBSES p 109709 N.O. TRERICE CO. $2.000.85 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES - 10971B T.S. TRIPP $525.00 CARPET CLEANING cn —I09nI _ Te' CA. AUTO-SUPPI.i.-JNC 183.1.19--- ---�PAUCE- TS _ 199712 J.G. TUCKER B SON. INC. $356.94 INSTRUMENT PART 109713 TWINING LABORATORIES OF 51.967.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89 0"7 ..^T ..^ee. UNT NALVTII" T32B.SL TIISTRUMBNT-PART— [n 309715 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $123.02 PARCEL BERVICE 109716 VWR SCIENTIFIC $1.324.90 LAB SUPPLIES —1WTI 7 VAL-6E-Y-G-FT4"-SUFP6"0. 'T.323.87 —PITPIMGS- 109718 VARIAN INSTRUMENT GROUP $246.09 LAB SUPPLIES 109719 VEHICLE SPRING SERVICE 450.00 TRUCK REPAIR 109722 •"6-ZNOUS4ALI -SURP6T `..' 19 SAPETI`-OUPPLIES 109721 RICHARD W. VON LARSEN $234.30 MEETING EXPENSE 109722 WEATHER L WIND INSTRUMENTS 5542.32 SAFETY SUPPLIES —109723 VCSYER"TATE-CHEMICAL-SUPPLE 49;.668.23 ------CAUSTIC dODA-M.O.-B-8-90-- 109724 ROURKE 1 VOODRUFF $49.072.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.6-4-89 109725 XEROX CORP. 51.342.4E COPIER LEASES —198726 "^USIAIE4.-INC `-9a 1118TRUHRM• -PART 109727 RICHARD B. EDGAR 5290.00 DEFERRED COHP DISTRIBUTION --------------- TOTAL CLAIMS PAID •39/26/9G 52.59J.154.67 W I FOND 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 09/20/90 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMRBR AP43 m COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTT l` CLA17 PAID 0 9 E I 0 0 i r. :� SUMMY AMOUNT #1 OPEN FUND $970.53 02 OPER FUND 02 CAP PAC FUND {477 B6T 54 f j .. Ya oPeA .. } ,-4S 5144 OS 03 CAP FAC FUND $1,935.61 05 OPER FUND $6,017.05 AS CAP FAC FUND 13 039.55 '#0 OPER FUND 06 CAP FAC FUND �" {67 70 ^„nj 47 OPER FUND $21.503'i.16 fry 07 CAP FAC FUND $19,562.50 Z 011 OPER FUND $7,890.53 C D 3 15B 11 n 013 OPER FUND 014 OPER-FUND _ "' t r $2 42: TA14 CAP PAC FUND g 0566 OPER FUND f4 70743 0566 CAP FAC FUND i13:682:19 67614 OF 9 543.65 00 JT OPER FORD y - CORE $521 743 37 AEP miNpBD N0A�H9-COMP ZNSORANCE FIND $20.230152 r. 3. JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $22B_322 97_ cn 2 590 144.67 Cl CO V COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS M ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFONNIA 109AA EW9 AVENUE October 3, 1990 - 20 BOX 9127 WUN1uN v1 .0 FOWA92T{ , 014,9922A11 �/ MEMORANDUM To: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager From: Ted Hoffman, Purchasing Manager Re: Purchase of Microcomputer Hardware, Software and Associated Peripherals, Specification No. E-191 Nine sealed bids were opened Tuesday, September 18, 1990, for the Purchase of Microcomputer Hardware, Software and Associated Peripherals. Photo & Sound Company was disqualified due to failure to submit the signed copy of the Non-Collusion Affidavit, a part of the Bid Specifications required submittal. A comparison of the individual bids by line item shows that by considering the lowest bid item from each supplier in each category, approximately $7,000.00 savings is realized. It is recommended that the award be made to the eight low-item bidders in an total combined amount of $82,515.35, plus sales tax as follows: Vendor Price Action Software, Anaheim $5,241.00 - CoastTech Computers, Irvine 2,523. 00 Computer Bay, Huntington Beach 7,823 .00 Inacomp Computer Center, Garden Grove 8, 694. 00 Kalleen's Computer Products, San Rafael 5,440.00 LB & Associates, Orange 5, 898.35 Microage, Fountain Valley 41,476.00 Microage, Santa Ana 5,420.00 Total $82,515.35 Respectfully Submitted; l� Liz L4rn- coley, Senior ruye "C-11, I AGENDA ITEM #9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-1" We hereby concur with the foregoing recommendation: Ted Hoffman,.' Purchasing Manager Steve Hovey, _ Informational SSeerviic Manager G. treed, Directoil of Finance LL-D,bp -2_ "C-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-Z" „.;i- + ��t�n�tJC,u1�+L„'^''*.,.,1” �-�L^1:.u+^7�G^_;;�t7�n:V•1na�CTZ'3Ya•L"•�''3':1• �4'7�11.^ailed'i1�i73�lIIt:u"'f�IL7d1:W"7�it71Ni�'S7�u'41•I��:t71��93at�' �:171� KW.'��:�FaaiJF:S:ID�'Y[dl�'va:r:QtL[GlQiffa:+.©i!�©41��Ptib7oFLta:lEk3cJ�}Ytd:;�Pl&1�:] !Ltif��f>•:�5:9�t'i12[��I'fZ��Si����ssa47u:ltac7©u�©C��IEJ��:I�rt:aJQ45Z��1tEJ�FLd:7 . 1...'.Il��1lTtYEi9l:4YL^:fI3IDE4S3'LGIfII'}E'�t'IIfiEiI©I.'�©F:�ELIIJfI':7R.')lIySIJfZYA:IEl'F}E'iI .. ��1�:d17t3�:a41�};d�E})PE'��'Fkds9�E4]©Fl��'k}311EFt1L��:}i1t1Qu1111d41�:'}1;��FE':lt'P}}EVI r(ii1�+^'I ��7t'4E':11)1di1��7]lSift':t314111�II'd11t'II&]"!eYfPJ'�SFS'itJPd:9l/FSllStlFaD�S114111HiC'I<�d:7f'SFSs'1 imna•:avmllfID Dili.7Li7iFACl�II41�ldil�lTd:7fI:E�fD[i1Q3J�3EJlIlCfIIti1�H'JftldJ�197�k7[411�3� - r ��Y]�1Eii�ldJ�IFG7�fA71�IIdJ�.]�FIS9rfIIli:�lA:tlfllkd{9t4d�P1�']lt �.]filM��41�'dB �i1�3J�&IYE��/dJlvE:ti�i1��Gtd:9EFdJ�ld71t}t11�Q'1'u�dJ�II:l�dtiit3'L:1 r:nr+n�rrn1n'+rn.n�F 41I-��ilid]lEffi:1t:5S1t:3L�t}4E}]t•}Yd1,©L��Id�©u��P:&]iGE:]WRENQLE7] ,Dy'�; 1! >r. �an�HillC�ElIL'l ItiFE.1mss rl)i np MjUAM EQMMGWlLIQEl ..MIU . ..MET1.1fffE�EHE:]Wt :ItfIEel 4i!."41•imStilSll.Ld6..d mill!II:7�l.:EJlfFE:7lQ�1lHLd�JlFI6J�td:1l.3E'.1�111&�ilHEUIQd�➢lYlE��'i.E:Il�E.1�'Eti9 IS:9U'7t"RiII 1•�rl^t"'>m�t rrm^'U "a9��llEiifL:9�lFStIlLCJ�T�fIIiE.1©li�l]IEJ�IFII:;l<:i}7!'&lCP]�t1:L7lFHf:Illld:llf} [L�(Tie11",Sar l•'�n"+rfl'rrt•IR76...�1t•rr.•-irm��E1fi11S:]EF}Fdtl�lfF&Af)LfE��kF.E�IIL'E.1©ll��!_:SJFlllisGl3A�lfI3iL'1lC.d.]lm. ,d:lflft'E:7!}};du W EII.Im: Ell}:E.l^E:IIIIE:II+Fd.711}d:1�1L:1©i1pNKMJNM .dFllQf�lF137�E.)l:FE.It[ii�dJ a!•r.-rn�nrlr• ��t116E:1lLiFS.1fFE�f111d�J�E9FIfLE:1ILi.7Fl1t&Id:l�:d•.lE'fLLJtYL'JI.A.f�/[:llff6:9 'ice" ^�''^ ���lislil�F'f�:IpYiE�tI01E:111[E:7lII:d47�1}i6�1}}I£JIIfE.I[.fS:1�F:ll]�4fE:J�ISkE.]Lli.E:IldSdJtiIldJ ��lFFd:]lII:llYid.Jlt}Z'7lfiLL:]i}15:7�Id.1�]TJl1IdJEIIds�1lIFEk1l13F}1lkdJ�:E:1�}E:,�FT.7 y. �irrn lrmlQII7[4"J' LL:::F>•fAll}Z7l7FF&IlF{ieli4:d:11hE:1QBE:1©l:�©u'�©u'�llkdJ�F.FE.]lBE:]fIII� r�crrno �il:nmlII ^J' LL!i[tlt•1WILK."lll'&lmju.Imon,M;)leM,m, lid©u�©u�etEJlfiE}ImAl.p�'Eil LL:4i}1l1lYi6S�1MUNEllllia:IlFI�l.M INIn :]©L'�©k.�©L'ml.1dJl_E:1lni-:1)lES7 .. .. iIICdl:Ffd:sild:7�:�d�i;lYM�J�[Ild41©L:? ©G��,7!'I�.YLu�SkLJl4a41�43� r �11�':diJ�d41�iE:1lUdJ�dJl1II:1liRS.9�I:�JIFYE:iQlidilll7t11t{gl{glfku�E:7lFM011Il'E:9 r�. .m^..^mrernrrc^.`s,'��r�r-��71:6J11'Evil 'E9lal"'immo mi.)mn 9�11M71[4]k:�E3�fdi9li'E:71f16:1 mr'�•'.'rt.... _. LR}tG7�11}YE:1lF�li}E:]f34di9lFiLGlyM21!}M471f1d:91Md47lliE4ll}Mai]lMdi7l1Yd411lFEJl1�M�lt�iE{7 ram. .,... .. L�:7C:111�FE:1�l E:;IF}E47 }EC9litE:s'�l4'.d011fI641R;fEi.I�EV1�6E:9=*uMwLlm."X, LLJl:1'Ei1�Pr'4S7 .. .. 1:1:t3ie1�117E:91::E��tE411[F'E:1�'3::�'SJlkLL'.9i}LSi�l}M41E}}�lY7lF1l}id}7l{EdJlLkd�tF}Ei7�:'E:� nl`illatYllirn.'I'aT•'l ;, ��1133d§7l'3ID.91F3d4Jifid'.Sl'Y$41lkLL'.'ll.F'E'ill:Pd':Il:td:'1ES4d'il?'}dit+3k})i6MJt135R11:':dG1l7:IiV L5:7F:i7t:1a7�1i141�i1�11i111L'il�il'S1��PLf7lGliu"9�:4i�141i'L3�:u�7lfJi'LTl�h7l9�L33i�i,.'filQ:u^7 !}l�ii')1�Iffi'J�FE4ilF&EJIS'}E9�64&SI�iL�'d}7©G:�lS'}7tl.Id' ➢lSlJl➢d4'1�]6'J�lr. . •�. t �ElELFFE:9�'FLd'J�FMu!)kPdiu�}}E'JIFII'd:'iitfl'E?9�:7!}}d'u�IIE'::�F}}Ll7l7tlH9li'L3J�i:IL{'1�1'3di1llF:d:9 ... '.. ��ltM4lldFE:1lIIE:1lffi'Jl'II'd'}ItII'E:71'ffdJt3.�)C1114di7t3.'d'Jl4IIJlPd4111k1411S1'dL7llid'ill'4d:') M7,1 illi'}LI:g �Itt�Bi9f}yNyglfl'E:i!➢'M:711M'iRIIL��✓l:i�ltFEJISL:H}7l'1pdJl5II'&:IfFFldJf'LFI'd:�l ��114E:71.FE:7lYid1lltid: !}id�©��lil6:7lMd'11��i�1�l.F"IJ leEJ � IMPS]!i'IIE{9ll'MYIfYIEE'JlLpdti7EUFEi'1ll'ISJR}FdJ�JI.'�lii4;7fidiLi'1©G�1i16JE70dG') . . .. ��lFM.lFi'i�:9l1PE5111I'd:9lFids9lEFEJIILLJQ4dJlII'Ei9EII'd'Jli!}]l:'REklllfid4lllfl'i]lII'E71�F1'J . .... Ellt}EvilSIdJll•4d:lEI:E:913'YLIIl}d[9]!!16'Jim'di]llt'd:�lE}LE{9lLdF1l}4&511LGd41�1'EJlkdJlII'EJ ...' ". . .. �111u'Etllkids'llrBE'JI:lE41lLgLul}l[Jil'13JlYkdull:dOlf}:d41l1tdJl}:'E�:IlL4d�J�I'Etiliyd'ulll'EJ . , . .. .. ... �Eiil}:'d:9�:'d':IlWE:7l.[QG7lFkdJii:�dUlll1L41t7LF�ltldlllH':d9]flfid:ifff#EEI�/:•'iffl'd41�Eh1lii3:1 �f}Jtfdv]lLG7�dv]llld4lt}dJ�l'd!'1�1d41�FiilDifE:i�1L'u�'EG�i6e11:'l9�IL'E71!}E:7�F1['E:'i.. ��11:'d'J�d179�':E.]iF:'I:7�Yd:7l6d.lid'J�'J�.ry�lk}FFI�'i"1k:lt1L:11:'I'fi7�{'d411:'M'i] ��©L�ll:'E:'Il'11'!:]"lMLf7liYl4J©L�IIldQiill'E::©L�14:'E511'L41111'1491'LI'&'i �:7C!Ql�F:GL':ll�Efd4:fM:'e}E:�<4E:1tf6�tidJ©t:�ild:Il/E::�Iti��Yd:]�tSJt}d�t;du E+•^-eraT'cr+„n �I"��rrnr�n � .�11:".,1���1©�i�13}'dJl4d:]11:3�11fd:1©��l1tE:7l:FIJ�.7G�lMd:l!}M:11�'E:116E7 ASP;�:7lFld:;l3fG7lIIE!7lr�lI:d:1fII41�1S.1E1&}]13:di7©fl�lt3�l:�iIDfP,&7 4. .. " •. ' ���dd:9�llslQ'Evl�Fd'.:ltF3S�'Fd:7�d21�1ld �Lld41ff4EJ©[l��'iT�'�E9lEid4lEkd� 4trne"'rr•m:r•�e+mre+r,-... �11�'via�Rr+ltidJlt•.rra�lemalll��G��tiS��G)©L�IkYEVIl3M01ltLa49l1M� COUNTY SANITATION Dimas September 18, 1990 m ORANGE COUMY. CAUFONNIA 1® EWE AV E GO.EON 919 MEMORANDUM WUMAINvA .G111FO "92M-91V OtY1su2 " TO: J. Wayne Sylvester RE: Blueprinting, Photocopying and Related Services Specification No. S-046 (Revised) Sealed bids were opened Tuesday, September 11, 1990 for outside Blueprinting, Photocopying and Related Services, for a period of one year, beginning October 15, 1990. They are as follows: Banana Blueprint, Irvine Consolidated Reprographics, Costa Mesa Continental Graphics, Irvine Overall costs for the one year contract period are based on an estimated projection as summarized on the attached tabulation sheets. Taking these projections into consideration, the adjusted gross annual bid amounts range from a low of $118,060.56 to a high of $128,021.52, plus sales tax. Banana Blueprint is the overall low bidder based on estimated quantity, unit costs and invoice discount. Based on expected usage, the new overall contract prices represent an approximate 8.07% lower cost than the current contract agreement, for items common to both years usage. It is recommended the award be made to Banana Blueprint for a one-year contract, for the gross annual amount not to exceed $118,060.50, plus sales tax, for all services bid under this specification, with option to renew up to four, one-year extensions. !—RRees-ppeectfully submitted, L. Lea -Dooley, o Senior Buyer "D-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-1" We hereby concur with the foregoing recommendation: l Ted Hoff a Purchasing D nager a. Dawes, Director of Engineering 1 , ry G St eed, Direct of Finance LL:bp cc: Gary G. Streed Rita Brown -2- "D-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 FTT.rs AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, allMUIOTIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: BRIIIDERSON CORPORATION DATE October 10. 1990 JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PTANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-19-2 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduot) $ 30,183.44 In accordance with contract provisions; the follawing changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authcxi ed and as compensat= therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - RUAIR DIGESTER GAS T The 8-inch PVC digester gas line located near the southwest corner of the new Central Power Generation Burl ;.,g is „rxlerg inn at a depth of five feet. At the point where it intersects the 108-inch effluent line, the digester gas line was required to be routed up and over the 108-inch line bringing the digester gas line very close to the surface before returning to the original depth. This condition was unknown to the Contractor and when operating his crawler crane in the area of the gas line, the line was ruptured. The Contractor was directed to excavate the Pipe and make the repair with a new section of pipe and encase in concrete on an emergency basis. The work was acconpli.shed by Contractor's force accent pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCR 04) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,812.44 TIME: EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Its - ADDITIONAL GROUNDING FOR CABLE TRAYS Two electrical grounds for the cable trays just below the first floor level on Column Lines 3 and 6 had been anitted from the contract drawings. The Contractor was directed to install the grounding cable and plate. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 5) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 403.00 T071L TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ION: 0 Calendar Days . "E-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-1" COMM SAKMMCN DISTRICTS OF CEMNGE COUNTY Page 2 of 4 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLLS AVENUE IdX•ID71'l.IN VALM, allaBMMUA 92708 1.) CHANCE ORDER C. O. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: BRINDERSON COMIC RATION DATE October 10. 1990 .NCB: CENTRAL POKER GEML *ON SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-19-2 Item 3 - ADD POKER AND CONTROLS FOR POMP The electrical power and controls to the generator recirculatiai pump located in the east end of basement level elevation -5 were not shown on the contract drawings even though the pump was specified in Section 64-2000 of the contract specifications. The contractor was directed to provide the necessary materials and labor on a limp sum basis negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 6) ADDED COST THT CHANCE ORDER MM: $ 4,204.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 - ADDITIONAL HOT WATER LOOP VALUES In order to facilitate operations and maintenance operations to isolate and drain Lines on the hot water loop piing that is interconnected to all the digesters, it was determined that the addition of four 10-inch gate valves and 2h-inch drain valves with piping would provide the flexibility needed. The utility piping is located in various utility tunnels throughout the plant. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 8) AD® COST THIS CHANCE ORDER 11.04: $ 21,918.00 TIME EXTENISIO] THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 5 - ELECTRICAL GROUNDING OF GENERATORS The Districts supplied five generators and exciters as manufactured by Cooper Energy Services. Each generator requires two electrical ground terminations, but only one was shown on the contract drawings. The Contractor was directed to provide theadditional five grounds. This work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 11) ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: $ 846.00 TIME ESffiiSIO] THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 30,183.44 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days "E-2" AGENDA ITEM, #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-2" COUNTY SAN1=CN DIS1RICM OF CRANC3: CCU= Page 3 0£ 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 En,T•TC AVENUE ECUMMIN VALIBY, allMFCRbMA 92708 CBANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (1) CONMU C1OR• BRINDERSON CORPORATION DATE October 10, 1990 JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-19-2 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed identaM to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incur-red by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SU144W OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date March 19, 1990 Original Contract Time 730 Calendar Days Original Completion Date March 19, 1992 Tice Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 730 Calendar Days Revised Final CcKpletion Due Date March 18, 1992 Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 19,753,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00 Thus Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 30,183.44 Amended Contract Price $ 19,783,183.44 \.WIWI "E-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-3" OOMM SANI TTON DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COMM Page 4 of 4 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 Ell S AVENUE EOUNMN VA=, CALnU NIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: BRDWERSON CORPORATION DATE 0 .NB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO, J-19-2 Board Authorization Date: October 10, 1990 CO WY SANrl!P CN M9MCIS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIPMMA RMOOMMENDED BY: Eng' Date Cgffstnmticn Manager Date BY: 7,171i PPAf AS TO PPEW - y g/ ;m Directtor of r ,;rwor;m Date Geieral Co B.1 Date • ACCEPTED BY, �t/' cmitcaator r "E-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUM9C Page 1 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 FrrT S AVENUE �wd FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIEORMA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: P. R. BURKE INDUSTRIAL CORP. DATE October 10, 1990 JOB: Tnm:zrTATION OF REPLACEMENT INFLUENT METERS, JOB NO. J-24 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 3,503.44 In accordance with contract provisions, the follawing changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as ccupeaeatian therefor, the following additions to or deductions frcm the ca:tract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - >•' ECTRTCAL GROUNDING OF METERS IN P2-11-1 METER VAULT AT PLANT NO. 2 This item is for the electrical grounding of the Knott Interceptor Trunk Meter, the District Three Trunk Meter, and the Coast Highway Trunk Meter in the P2-11-1 Meter Vault to an existing ground rod in the adjacent P2-11 Meter Vault. In general, the meters are being ground using the flaw meter grounding systems that are existing in the metering structures. There is no ground rod existing in the P2-11-1 Meter Vault and the old meters in this vault were ground to a cable tray. There are no details provided in the contract doc ments for electrical grounding of the flow meters being installed in this contract. This item of work was acccuplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: EOO 1) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,080.44 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - PLANT 1 DIVERSION WIER TN.CTAL=O N The Contractor could not perform contract work on three scheduled occasions resulting in domtime because the Plant 1 Diversion Meter could not be isolated. The volume of leakage through the slide gate guides and over the gates used to isolate the meter was tco great to allow the meter installation on all occasions. The work was required to be perfon ed on a Sunday night at a period of la west flew. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,437.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 20 Calendar Days "F-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 FILLS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 �as� CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: P. R. BURKE INDUSTRIAL CORP. DATE October 10, 1990 JOB: INSIAT.LATION OF REPLACEMENT INFLUENT METERS, JOB NO. J-24 Item 3 - DELETION OF PLANT 1 DIVERSION METER INSTALLATION The installation of the Plant 1 Diversion Meter is being deleted from: the contract. The installation of this Districts-furnished meter is the only item of contract work left to be completed but cannot be performed because the Districts' is unable to adequately isolate flow from the meter. The Districts will have to repair the slide gates that are used to isolate the meter before the installation can be performed. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. DEDUCTED Cow THIS CRANGE ORDER TTEM: ($ 2,000.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 - DELETE PROGRAbWNG OF MULTI-CHANNEL. COMPUTATIONAL DEVICES This item is for the deletion of the programming of the Nn:l.ti-Channel Computational Devices as described in Section 54-802 of the specifications. New programming needs have been identified and the programming for these devices will be provided by a purchase order separate from this contract. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. DEDUCTED OXST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($ 3,014.00) TIME ]LION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE CRDER: $ 3,503.44 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 20 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all Previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 20 days' extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. "F-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(e)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLLS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALFCRNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. No. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: P. R. BURXE INDUSTRIAL CORP. DATE October 10, 1990 JOB: INSTALLATION OF REPLACIZENT INFLUENT METERS, CONTRACT NO. J-24 SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date February 27, 1990 Original Contract Time 180 Calendar Days Original Completion Date August 25, 1990 Time Extension this C.O. 20 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 20 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 200 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date September 13, 1990 Actual Final Completion Date September 13, 1990 Tine Subject to Liquidated Damages None Original Contract Price $ 214,464.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 18,227.37 This Change (Add) (Deduct) .$ 3,503.44 Amended Contract Price $ 236,194.81 Board Authorization Date: O tober 10, 1990 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALINTAWIA BY 'MEU BY: Engineer Date Codstruation Manager Date BY: APPROVED AS TO{/��M �lJlaai of Engineering Date GeDeral Cdansel. �a P. R. BURRS INDUSTRIAL CORP. \� ACCEPTED BY: Contractor "F-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-3" RESOLUTION NO. 90-137 ACCEPTING JOB NO. J-24 AS COMPLETE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING JOB NO. J-24 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING �✓ FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, P. R. Burke Industrial Corporation, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Installation of Replacement Influent Meters, Job No. J-24, on September 15, 1990; and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Director of Engineering has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Installation of Replacement Influent Meters, Job No. J-24, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated February 27, 1990; and, Section 4. That the Districts' Director of Engineering is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with P. R. Burke Industrial Corporation, setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Installation of Replacement Influent Meters, Jab No. J-24, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel ; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for Itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1990. "G AGENDA ITEM #9(e) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "G" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 2 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 PET AVENUE V� FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Six (6) CONTRACTOR: Gust R. Newberg Construction Co. DATE October 10, 1990 JOB: PRNMARY CLARIFIERS NOS. 6-15 AND RELATED FM'.Tr.r= AT RECCADMON PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-33 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Aaduet) $ 23,000.00 in aoca¢dance with contract p_r�, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby autharized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or doductuins from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - ADDITIONAL RETAINM WALIS AND CONCRETE FLf!MrU NODIFICATIONS The Contractor was directed to add retaining walls to the east and west ramp areas at the primary clarifiers. These walls were added to support the soil backfill ground elevations as shown on the contract plans. Also included in this item is the addition of a rustication strip at the horizontal construction joints on the fluted surfaces of the north, east and west exterior walls of the primary clarifiers. These walls are highly visible from the new main roadway that is included in this project. The added rustication strip will enhance the architectural finish of the fluted surface and conceal the required structural construction joint. The rustication strip was not shown on the contract plans. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #18, RFI #84 GK N #370-30) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 23,000.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOM ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 23,000.00 TOTAL TINE EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change order. "H-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-1" COUNTY SANITP.TION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 2 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 FIT SS AVENUE FZA BUN VALLEY, CALIFOENIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Six (6) CONTRACTOR: Gust E. Newberg Construction Co. DATE October 10, 1990 JOB: PRUPM CLARIFIERS NOS. 6-15 AND RELATED FAC77.rrrFc AT RKMA MOM PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-33 SM9MY OF CONTRPLT TINE Original Contract Date November 2, 1989 Original Contract Time 800 Calendar Days Original Completion Date January 11, 1992 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 22 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 814 Calendar Days Revised Final Cmpletion Due Date January 25, 1992 Actual Final Completion Date January 25, 1992 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 39,657,000.00 Prey. Auth. Changes $ 783,356.00 This Change (Add) (&sdu�) $ 23,000.00 Amended Contract Price $ 40,463,356.00 Board Authorization Date: October 10, 1990 COUHI7 SANr'a' CN DLSMCTS OF amm waRr C, alla &d71A REKwip // BY: , n Date Construction Mp6ger Date BY: AP AS 70 E0I7N: In w 6y17¢� �u ' 9�`�%C or of ;rig to General Co sal Date GIST R. NUEM 0O STRUMON COMPANY BY: Cdntf- t O actor jWate "H-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORMIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Three (31 CONTRACTOR: zIEBARTH & ALPER DATE October 10, 1990 JOB: GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECEAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-1 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Daduek.) $ 9,644.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as cca eneation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - YARD PAVING DRAIN REVISIONS EAST OF M & D STRUCTURE The contract plans show the proposed drain running from a new floor sink into an existing drain box (DWG: 1Y07) . Field investigations revealed that the existing drain box sewer had been previously plugged with concrete. The area drain was rerouted to an existing 6-inch PVC sewer line located to the north of the demolished Ferric Chloride Facility. A P-Trap was added to the drain to control odors from the sewer. The invert of the 6-inch PVC sewer is above the invert of the proposed floor sink. A new precast catch basin was used to replace the floor sink. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference PCH O10) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,500.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - PILE CAP REVISIONS AT GAS COMPRESSOR BUILDING Existing piles were discovered to be too close to the location of proposed piles at the Gas Compressor Building. Five piles were required to be relocated - because the existing piles were too close to allow the full development of the proposed piles capacity. The pile caps at these locations were redesigned to accommodate the relocated piles. Three other piles met refusal before being driven to grade. These piles were replaced. The replacement piles were predrilled to a lower elevation to facilitate driving them to grade. The pile caps were redesigned to accommodate the new layout of the piles at these locations. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference PCH 012) These changes were recommended by the Districts' soils and foundations consultants. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 14,106.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "I-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 MIS.IS AVENUE FOUNDkIN VAISEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Three (3) CONTRACTOR: 21EBART'H S ALPER DATE October 10. 1990 JOB: GAS HASIDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION FLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-1 Item 3 - M 5 D E'IBCTRICAL DUCT BANK REVISIONS The plans and specifications show an electrical duct bank to be installed from the proposed City Water P:np Station to the existing M 6 D Structure. This proposed duct bank is sham on the plan sheet 1E02. An existing electrial duct bank was constructed during the P1-20 contract that can be used in lieu of constructing the proposed ductbank between the M 6 D Structure and Manhole 4-23. This change requires the relocation of Manhole 4-23 onto the existing ductbank. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCB 004) DEDUUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (9,962.00) TIM EaENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER $ 9,644.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSICN THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change order, and ::o direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costa, expenses, losses or damages have been our will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date February 27, 1990 Origioal Contract Tice 730 Calendar Days Original Completion Date February 26, 1992 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 730 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date February 26, 1992 Actual Final. Completion Date Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 13,098,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 88,357.00 This Change (Add) (DoduQt-) $ 9,644.00 Amended Contract Price $ 13.196.001.00 "I-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-2" COUWY SANI ON DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELL IS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CAIMURNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Three (3) CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH & ALPER DATE October 10, 1990 JOB: GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. Pl-34-1 Board Authorization Date: October 10, 1990 COUNTY SANITATICN DISTRICTS OF amm Comm, CALnumm SUMS= BY: q-d-m mmL .9114112, Engineer Date ger Date HY: APPR� AS TO "RF1: xftQ- ti 9- 9d t977�oi f2 y�!-%G uector of Engineering Date General Co eel prate ZIEBARTH & ALPER ACCWIED sY: CcntzaL-tbf- Date "I-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "1-3" COUNTY SAMEATION DISTRICTS OF ORANE COUNTY Page 1 of 2 P. O. BOX 8127 - 108*4 ELLIS AVENUE POMMIN VALLEY, waT•IECRNra 92708 CHANCE ORDER C. 0. NO. Five f51 CONTRA ROR: Pdvanco Constructors. Division of DATE October 10. 1990 Zurn Constructors, Inc. JOB: SLUDGE HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB No. P1-34-2. Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 32,309.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the folloing changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as cospeoeation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - INSTALLATION OF 84-INCH STEEL BULRBEAAD AND PIIdOW PLUG In order to permit the P1-33 Contractor to construct the new Effluent Junction Box on the 84-inch plan effluent line, Pdvanco Constructors installed a tesporary 84-inch steel bulkhead and pillow, plug in the line to isolate awed reroute flows at the new structure. The P1-34-2 Contractor was selected to perform the work to assist the Districts in rerouting the plant effluent because the ca%=W had performed the work successfully on a previous contract and had the experience to do so again. The bulkhead and pillow will be removed after the P1-33 Contractor completes the new Effluent Junction Boot work. Payment for the removals will be provided by a future change order. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: - $ 32,309.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER: $ 32,309.00 TOTAL TIME EXTEIw14ION THIS CB}1NGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. "J-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 2 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 Er-T AVENUE F00WLtN VALLEY, CUMFURNfa 92708 CHANGE ORDER . C. O. NO. Five (5) CMMAMOR: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE October 10, 1990 turn Constrictors. Inc. JOB: SLUDGE HANDLnr_ FACILITIES AT RECIA =ON PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-29 SUMb= OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date Angust 1, 1989 Original Contract Tive 600 Calendar Days Original Completion Date March 23, 1991 Time Extension This C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 600 Calendar Days Revised Ccupletion Date March 23, 1991 Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 19,085,600.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 328,021.74 This Change (Arid) (edict) $ 32,309.00 Amended Contract Price $ 19,445,930.74 Hoard Authorization Date: October 10, 1990 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF amm Comm, CAL'Ihi4um BY: @ ED 9-i -90 1 9 Engineer Date stiuctioh ager Date AT trector Y: APPROVED AS TO f Engineering Date General Counsel Date ADD= CCNSTFmCmm, DIVISIIX7 OF ZURN Commmmas, INC. BY: 4�IN-�U Cdp� r Date "J-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ' OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 1 / (714)asz-tan September 25, 1990 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Professional Services Tint with J. T. Horvath & Associates for Specialized Construction Management Services in Connection with Construction of Various Master-Planned Projects In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with J. T. Horvath & Associates for specialized construction management and inspection services on master-planned construction projects, at hourly rates, plus direct expenses at cost, for a two-year period beginning October 11, 1990. Construction Management Services, at the hourly rate of $35.00 for the first year $37.50 for the second year The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/A. B. Catlin /s/William Mahoney A. B. Catlin William Mahoney Joint Chairman Vice Joint chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Thomas M. Dawes Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering _ Selection Committee "K" AGENDA ITEM #9( J ) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "K" RESOLUTION NO. 90-139 APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH `J J. I. HORVATH & ASSOCIATES FOR PE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMEN AND INSPECTION SERVICES A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH J. T. HORVATH & ASSOCIATES FOR SPECIALIZED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH VARIOUS MASTER-PLANNED CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with J. T. Horvath & Associates for specialized construction management and inspection services in connection with various master-planned construction projects; and, WHEREAS, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has negotiated and certified the final negotiated fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND. ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Professional Services Agreement dated October 10, 1990, by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County and J. T. Horvath & Associates, for specialized construction management and inspection services, on an as-needed basis, for a two-year period beginning October 11, 1990, in connection with various master-planned construction projects, is hereby approved and accepted; ``W/ and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized at the "L-1" AGENDA ITEM #9( i ) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-1" following hourly rates in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement: Agreement Period Hourly Rate 10/11/90 - 10/10/91 $35.00 10/11/91 - 10/10/92 37.50 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1990. "L-2" AG9NDA ITEM #9( 1 ) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ' OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 oy w.iM 10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714(962-2411 September 25, 1990 Boards of Directors county Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10044 Ellis Avenue Fointain Valley, California 92708-7018 subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Professional Services Agreement with E. P. Lindstrom, Inc. in Connection with Providing Technical and Environmental Consulting Services In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fees with E. P. Ididstrcm, Inc. for professional eoVironmlental and technical consulting services necessary for supporting NPDES permit application and cEQA program, an an hourly-rate basis for labor including overhead and profit, plus subconsultants fees and direct expenses, in an total mount not exceed $164,500.00, as follows: Professional consulting services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor including overhead and - profit, not to exceed $142,500.00 Suhconsultants fees, at cost, not to exceed 10,000.00 Direct expenses, not to exceed 12,000.00 Total contract amount, not to exceed $164,500.00 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/A. B. Catlin /s/william Mahoney A. B. Catlin William Mahoney Joint Cbi=n Vice Joint Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Thamlas M. Daces This M. Dawes Director of Engineering - Selection Committee "M" AGENDA ITEM #9(k)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS I'M" RESOLUTION NO. 90-140 APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH K. P. LIND TROM, IN . FOR ENVIRONMENTAL NSULTING SERVICES A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH K. P. LINDSTROM, INC. FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with K. P. Lindstrom, Inc. for environmental consulting services to assist staff on NPOES Permit activities, regulatory and legislative liaison activities; and for technical support for sludge management, air quality, reclamation and conservation issues and in connection with CEQA compliance for Master Plan projects; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of Directors on September 12, 1990, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has negotiated and certified the final negotiated fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Professional Services Agreement dated October 10, 1990, by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County and K. P. Lindstrom, Inc., for environmental "N-1" AGENDA. ITEM #9(k) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-1" consulting services to assist staff on NPDES Permit activities, regulatory and legislative liaison activities; and for technical support for sludge management, air quality, reclamation and conservation issues and in connection with CEQA compliance for Master Plan projects, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows: Professional Services, at hourly rates for direct labor, including overhead and profit, not to exceed $142,500.00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 12,000.00 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 10,000.00 TOTAL AMOUNT, not to exceed $164,500.00 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel . . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1990. "N-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(k) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-2" RESOLUTION NO. 90-141 APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF ANT OF EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF GRANT OF EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN SCEC EQUIPMENT WHICH WILL PROVIDE POWER TO THE NEW CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17, AND CONTROL CENTER/OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING, JOB NO. J-23-1 The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated September 11, 1990, wherein the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County grant a service easement to the Southern California Edison Company (SCEC) to operate and maintain SCEC equipment in the vicinity north of the Auto Repair Shop and the northeast corner of the new Central Laboratory building, in the City of Fountain Valley, which will provide power to the new Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17, now under construction, and the Control Center/Operations and Maintenance Building, Job No. J-23-1, now under design, is hereby approved; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said easement is granted to Southern California Edison Company for maintenance and repair of the incoming underground duct bank and transformer equipment which will provide electrical power to the Districts' - "0-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(m) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-1" Central Laboratory and Control Center/Operations and Maintenance Building; and. V� Section 4. That said easement is granted at no cost to Southern California Edison Company; and, Section S. That the Chairman and Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Grant of Easement in form approved by the General Counsel . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1990. "0-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(m) - ALL DISTRICTS ^0-2" RESOLUTION NO. 90-142 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH RANTING AN EASEMENT TO CITY IN EXCHANGE FOR QUITCLAIM DEED TO DISTRICTS RE PREVIOUS �✓ EASEMENT AT PLANT NO. 2 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AUTHORIZING GRANT OF EASEMENT TO CITY FOR ACCESS TO A CITY WATER LINE THROUGH TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 IN EXCHANGE FOR A QUITCLAIM DEED FROM CITY RE PREVIOUS WATER LINE EASEMENT ALSO CROSSING TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 : x z x � x � e z • : e e x x The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Agreement dated October 10, 1990, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and the City of Newport Beach, providing for execution of a Grant of Easement to the City of Newport Beach for right-of-way to access and maintain a City water line crossing through Treatment Plant No. 2 in exchange for a Quitclaim Deed quitclaiming the City's interest in a previous water line easement also crossing through Treatment Plant No. 2, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the certain Grant of Easement dated October 10, 1990, wherein a 10-foot wide perpetual easement and right-of-way through Districts' Treatment Plant No. 2 is granted to the City of Newport Beach, is hereby approved; and, Section 3. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly shown and described on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, - 11P-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(n) - ALL DISTRICTS "P-1" Section 4. That said Grant of Easement is hereby granted at no cost to V� the City; and, Section S. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for Itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Grant of Easement in forth approved by the General Counsel ; and, Section 6. That the certain Quitclaim Deed dated September 19, 1990, wherein the City of Newport Beach quitclaims to the County Sanitation Districts the City's interest in a previous water line easement through Treatment Plant No. 2, is hereby accepted; and, Section 7. That the real property to be deeded is more particularly shown and described on Exhibits "A" and "C" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 8. That said Quitclaim Deed is granted at no cost to the Districts; and, Section 9. That the Secretary of the Board is hereby authorized and directed to record said Quitclaim Deed in the Official Records of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1990. "P-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(n) - ALL DISTRICTS "P-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 IOW ELLIS.FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92709•7018 (714(W8 2411 September 19, 1990 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 2 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Professional Services Agreement with Willdan Associates for Preparation of Project Report in Connection with Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1 In accordance with the District's procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with Willdan Associates for the preparation of a Project Report in connection with Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-111, on an hourly-rate basis including labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants fees and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed $35,080.00, as follows: Professional Services, (hourly rates including labor plus overhead at 175%) , not to exceed $26,822.00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 1,000.00 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 3,500.00 Fixed Profit 3,758.00 TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed $35,080.00 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. VIry Pickler VJames Neal Iry Pickler, Chairman James Neal , Chairman pro tem District No. 2 District No. 2 Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Thomas M. Dawes Thomas M. Dawes �...� Director of Engineering Selection Committee "0" AGENDA ITEM #9(o) (1) - DISTRICT 2 "p^ RESOLUTION NO. 90-146-2 APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WILLDAN ASSOCIATES FOR PREPARTITURTF PROJECT REPORT RE CONTRACTNO. -R1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WILLDAN ASSOCIATES FOR PREPARATION OF A PROJECT REPORT FOR REHABILITATION OF CYPRESS AVENUE SUBTRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-9-RI t ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * ! t * * t * * 4 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with Willdan Associates for preparation of a Project Report for Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-941; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Board of Directors on August 8, 1990, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has negotiated and certified the final negotiated fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Professional Services Agreement dated October 10, 1990, by and between County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County and Willdan Associates, for preparation of a Project Report for Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows: "R-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(o)(2) - DISTRICT 2 "R-I" Professional Services, at hourly rates for direct labor, including overhead at 175%, not to exceed $26,822.00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 1,000.00 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 3,500.00 Fixed Profit 3,758.00 TOTAL AMOUNT, not to exceed $35,080.00 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 2 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel . - PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1990. "R-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(0) (2) - DISTRICT 2 "R-2" COITiTY 'UW=ON DISTRICIS CF ORANGE COLMY Page 1 of 4 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 F7.T.TF AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CATZECRTTn 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: SANCON cav-,•."==G, INC. . DATE October 10, 1990 JOB: R11ABILT=CN OF MANECI.LS ON MI=-HOLDER TRUNK MM, CONTRACT NO. 3-33R Amount of this Change Order (Add) (DsdQ t) $ 21,067.00 In accordance with cent act rmnrinions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as cation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Iten 1 - CITY OF H@IEMMON BEACH MANHOLE NOT SWKN ON PLANS The Contractor encountered a City of Huntington Beach manhole within two feet of the structure wall of Manhole No. 37 (Station No. 435+2667, see Sheet 10 of the contract plans), which was not shown on the plans. The Contractor was directed to make additional saw cuts as necessary to remove the top of the structure and to prevent damage to the city manhole. This iten was aoccapLished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,481.00 TIM EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days item 2 - MANH= NOT AS SWM ON PLANS The Contractor discovered that the top of Structure No. 35 (Station No. 414+47.35, see Sheet 10 of the contract plans), was 6 inches thicker than that shown on the plans. The Contractor was directed to make additional saw cuts as necessary to remove the top of the structure. This item was aoccupl9whed by Contractor's force account in accordance with Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER I'iRM: $ 3,586.00 ME FXTENLSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: - 0 Calendar Days "S-1" AGENDA ITEM #90) - DISTRICT 3 "S-1" COUNTY SANr CN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE CMM Page 2 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 EIT TC AVENUE FOIIDIPAIIi VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (1) CONIRACIOR: SANCON ENGINEERING, INC. . DATE October 10, 1990 JOB: RIUMI .1=0N OF MANHOLES ON lv d -HOLDER TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-33R Item 3 - RRHABI T=ON OF MANHOIZ NO. 93 The method of repair for Manhole No. 93 (Station 1002+02.80, see Sheet 13 of the oontract.plans) was changed from complete replacement to interior rebuilding to avoid extensive site work which would impact traffic and rewire removal of landscaping, including eight trees and shrubs. Complete replacement would also have required extensive shoring of a 40-foot, 2:1 slope. In lieu of the work specified the Contractor was directed to water blast the manhole shaft, cone and grade rings, apply gunite, and coat with a nund+=+m thickness of 250 millimeters of polyurethane coating. This item includes the cost for all labor, materials, and equipment. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. Items 9a and 9b will be deleted from the schedule of prices in a future change order for adjustment of engineers' quantities as follows: DE= UNIT ]?RICE Item 9a $31,000.00 Item 9b $10,000.00 . Subtotal - $41,000.00 ADDITION This item $16,000.00 Net Deduction = $25,000.00 This results in a net deduction to the contract of $25,000.00. ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: $ 16,000.00 TIME EXTEPSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 21,067.00 '1'0PAT TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days "S-2" AGENDA ITEM #90) - DISTRICT 3 "S-2" =BUy SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OPAL COUNTY Page 3 of 4 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENGE EaBWkIN VALLEY, CAL FURNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. One fll CGNII2ACTOR: SANCON ENGMMING, INC., DATE October 12, 1990 JOB: REHABILITATION OF MANHOLES ON MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SE4AER, CONTRACT NO. 3-33R The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions of the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMPIIPM OF CONTRACT TINE Original Contract Date May 21, 1990 Original Contract Time 360 Calendar Days Original Carpletion Date May 15, 1991 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time No Change Revised Final Carpletion Due Date No Change Actual Final Carpletion Date Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 2,253,300.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (act) $ 21,067.00 Amended Contract Price $ 2,274,367.00 "S-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(p) - DISTRICT 3 "S-3" CMM SANr=CN DISIRIC1'S OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 4 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 EDLIS AVENUE FCXREAM VALiEY, OUJFORCIIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER �•r� C. O. NO. One (II CONLRA=: SANCON ENGIDffi2ING, INC. . QATE October 12, 1990 ..JOB: REBABTT.a=CN OF HANECMS ON N.ILLER-HOIDER TRUNK SEWER, OONI'RACr NO. 3-33R Board Authorization Date: October 10, 1990 CO7NN cnnrmmmrON D1=C15 OF ORIiT M COOTII'Y, Cars UOUA SUBMITTED BY: RECOEMENDED B✓ �r l2n J .)0,2 a 9-14-90 9 b Date n ger Date A7tB,Y: APPROVBD AS TO ECM: IlIq Director of &4umering Date General Counsel Date SANCCN MM E RING, INC. ACCEMDDBB�Y: fT2 / ,".9 y-90 Contractor Date "S-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(p) - DISTRICT 3 "S-4" COUNTY SANrf MCN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 5 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 V-1-1 AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Three (31 CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction Co. DATE October 10, 1990 JOB: Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road Contract No. 14-1-1B Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Daduat) $ 90,319.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as coupensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - INSTALL LARGER TRAFFIC SIGNAL DETECTION LOOPS The Contractor was directed to install larger traffic signal inductive detection loops at the intersections of Baker Street and Bear Street, Milbro Street and Baker Street and Baker Street and Bristol Street (see Sheets 7, 8 and 11 of the contract plans) . The inspector for the City of Costa Mesa provided direction to the OCSD inspector for this item. This is a reimbursable item by the City of Costa Mesa. This item was acconplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 1D-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,198.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - UNDISCLOSED UTILITIES The Contractor encauntereM undisclosed utilities at various locations while excavating the new 84-inch sewer line. The Contractor was directed to investigate and excavate around the undisclosed utilities and to make the necessary repairs. Following is a tabulation of the additional. work: Location (Station No. ) Sheet No. Utility Amount 212+04 11 1-inch water line 212+04 11 1-inch gas line $1,078.00 212+99 11 1-inch water line 213+50 11 1/2-inch gas line 1,078.00 This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,156.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "U-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(r)(1) - DISTRICTS 6,7 & 14 11U-1" COUNTY SANIM01ON DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 FUT S AVENUE �i FOIIITPP.'N VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Three (3) CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction Co. DATE October 10, 1990 JOB: Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road Contract No. 14-1-IB Item 3 - EXISTING EDISON VAULTS NOT AS SHOWN ON PLANS The Contractor encountered two Edison electric vaults which encroached into the limits of the excavation of the proposed 10-inch sewer. The Contractor was directed to install permanent 10-inch sewer line bypasses around the vaults from Station No. 203+20 to 203+55 and from Station No. 210+00 to 210+55 (see Sheet 11 of the contract plans). This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 9,472.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days Item 4 - REPAIRS DUE TO LEAF Mr. 16-1NM WATER LINE The mesa Consolidated Water District had a 16-inch water line which leaked into the excavation area after the 84-inch sewer line was installed, saturating the trench and buckling the asphalt at Station No. 215+00 (see Sheet 11 of the contract plans) . The Contractor was directed to excavate the wet material from the trench, recount the backfill and repave the surface. .The inspector for the Mesa Consolidated Water District provided direction to the OCSD inspector for this item. This is a reimbursable item by the Mesa Consolidated Water District. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force amount pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. AUK COST THIS CHANGE CRDER ITEM: $ 2,527.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Days Item 5 - REIACP.1'E TRAFFIC CONDUIT The Contractor was directed to relocate the traffic conduit which was removed during the widening of Baker Street, on the north side of Baker Street from Station No. 72+50 to 75+30 (see Sheet 9 of the contract plans) . The inspector for the City of Costa Mesa provided direction to the OCSD inspector for this item. This is a reimbursable item by the City of Costa Mesa. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force amount pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,200.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "U-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(r) (1) - DISTRICTS 6,7 & 14 "U-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 5 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 EfT.TA AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIEOUTA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Three (3) CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction Co. DATE October 10, 1990 JOB: Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road Contract No. 14-1-1B Item 6 - STRIPING A MO D MEDIAN ISLAND The Contractor was directed to install double yellow striping conforming to CALTRANS standards around the median island on Baker Street in the CALTRANS right-of-way. The striping was changed from that shown on the contract plans at the request of the City of Costa Mesa and CALTRANS. The inspector for the City of Costa Mesa provided direction to the OCSD inspector for this item. This is a reimbursable item by the City of Costa Mesa. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2(B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,266.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 7 - BONUS PAYMENT The contract specified 360 days for contract ccupletion with provisions including liquidated damages of $500.00 per day for each day of delay past the 360 days and bonus payments of $500.00 per day for each day of ccupletion prior to November 17, 1990, excluding the holiday season of November 18, 1989 through January 7, 1990 (Reference: Detailed Specifications, Section 50-8) , and including the time extension on Item 9. Revised Actual Days' Bonus Completion Date Completion Date (w/holiday timeI Bonus/Dav Bonus November 17, 1990 July 5, 1990 135 $500.00 $ 67,500.00 ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: $ 67,500.00 Tim EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "U-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(r) (1) - DISTRICTS 6,7 & 14 "U-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 5 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 Ei.LIS AVENUE �i FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIECRNIA 92708 CHANCE ORDER C. O. NO. Three (3) CONTRAMCR: Steve Bubalo Construction Co. DATE October 10, 1990 JOB: Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road Contract No. 14-1-1B Item 8 - SUBSTITUTE 84-INCH HOP IN LIEU OF 81-INCH RCP The Contractor elected to substitute 84-inch RCP in Lieu of the 81-inch RCP, per Part III, Section 115 of the Detailed Specifications and as shown on the contract plans, and Items 1, 2, 3 and 10 of the Schedule of Prices. This substitution was made with no change to the unit bid price for these items. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 9 - TIME EXTENSION The Contractor was directed to remove unsuitable subgrade material prior to placement of the new road surface. The inspector for the City of Costa Mesa provided direction to the OCSD inspector for this. (The Contractor is granted a time extension of six days for the additional City of Costa Mesa road work. This will result in an additional six days of bonus payment of $500.00 per day equaling a total of $3,000.00 which is reimbursable by the City of Costa Mesa.) This item also resolves a claim for time extension for delays because of undisclosed utilities and utilities not sham on plans by granting a four calendar day time extension. In accordance with Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions, the Contractor is granted a total of ten calendar days. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 10 Calendar Days TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 90,319.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 13 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 13 days' extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Ord "U-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(r)(1) - DISTRICTS 6,7 & 14 "U-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 0£ 5 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 TNT S AVENUE EOUN1'AIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Three (3) CONTRACIOR: Steve Buba.lo Construction Co. DATE October 10, 1990 JOB: Baker-Gisler Interceptor. from Bristol Street to Fairview Road Contract No. 14-1-JB Sf 090Y OF CONTRACT TINE Original Contract Date September 20, 1989 Original Contract Time 360 Calendar Days" Original Coupletion Date November 4, 1990 Time Extension this C.O. 13 Calendar Days Total Tine Extension 13 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 373 Calendar Days Revised CCmPletion Date _ Novarber 17, 1990 Tine Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Coupletion Date Not Applicable Excluding November 18, 1989 through January 7, 1990 Original Contract Price $ 5,345,523.30 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 137,269.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 90,319.00 Amended Contract Price $ 5,573,111.30 Board Authorization Date: October 10, 1990 Cry SAMIATION DISTRICTS OF Omim COUNTY, CUXFCMA SOBFIITTED BY: BY: le1rcR 17'c ncn 6/ /��o Engineer Date CArtruction Manager Date BY: APPROVED AS TO >URM: erector of Engindaring Date General Counsel Date SIM BUBALO CONSTROCTION CO. ACCEPTED BY: /Contractor Dane "U-5" AGENDA ITEM x9(r) (1) - DISTU CTS S,7 & 1_T1 "U-5" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 PIET S AVENUE FOUNnUV VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Four (4) CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction Co. DATE October 10, 1990 JOB: Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road Contract No. 14-1-1B Amount of this Change Order (ADD) (DEDUCT) ($ 28,641.00) In mocordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby autlrm wed and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions f= the contract price are hereby approved. ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES ADD: Change in Item - Quantity No. Unit Description Fran To Difference 1 L.F. 81-inch RCP 853 854 1 @ $520.00 = $ 520.00 2 L.F. 81-inch RCP 5,698 5,707 9 @ $490.00 = 4,410.00 15 V.F. 60-inch M.H. 48 64.16 16.16 @ $612.00 = 9,890.00 16 V.F. 48-inch M.H. 77 95.60 18.60 @ $360.00 = 6,696.00 SUBTOTAL = $ 21,516.00 Schedule I.E., 6 Ton Asphaltic Concrete 4,779 5,489 710 @ $ 32.00 = $ 22,720.00 7 S.F. 4-inch PCC Sidewalk 1,169 1,330 161 @ $ 4.00 = 644.00 12 EA. Adjust M.H. 22 24 2 @ $200.00 = 400.00 17 EA. Pavement Markers 9 12 3 @ $ 15.00 = 45.00 19 EA. Pavement Markers 453 508 55 @ $ 4.00 = 220.00 20 EA. Pavement Markers 368 433 65 @ $ 4.00 = 260.00 21 EA. Traffic Signal Loops 40 71 31 @ $300.00 = 9,300.00 SUBTOM = $ 33,589.00 TOTAL = $ 55,105.00 "V-1" AGENDA ITEM #9( r) (2) - DISTRICTS 6, 7 & 14 "V-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELL IS AVENUE FODNTAIN VALLEY, CALIEORNIA 92708 �. CHANGE ORDER v.r� C. O. NO. Four (4) CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction Co. DATE October 10, 1990 JOS: Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road Contract No. 14-1-IB DEDUCT: Change in Item Quantity No. Unit Description From To Difference 4 L.F. 60-inch RCP 112 190 22 @ $685.00 = ($15,070.00) 8 L.F. 10-inch VCP 271 269 2 @ $ 83.00 = ($ 166.00) SUHIOTAL = ($15,236.00) Schedule "B" 5 Ton Asphaltic Concrete 24,666 22,669 1,997 @ $ 30.00 = ($59,910.00) 8 L.F. Curb & Otter 293 190 103 @ 16.00 = ( 1,648.00) 9 S.F. 6" PCC Driveway 882 567 315 @ 6.00 = ( 1,890.00) 13 EA Adjust Valve 51 39 12 @ 150.00 = ( 1,800.00) 16 - S.F. Pavement Markers 3,356 2,218 1,118 @ 2.80 = ( 3,130.00) 18 EA Pavement Markers 80 36 44 @ 3.00 - ( 132.00) SUBMM = ($68,510.00) TOTAL = ($83,746.00) TOM DEDUCPED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: ($28,641.00) TOM TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 calendar Clays The additional work contained within this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore nnitually agreed that no time is required for this change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. "V-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(r) (2) - DISTRICTS 6, 7 & 14 "V-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 FrT S AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CAi MMIA 92708 \� CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Four (4) CONl'RAC10R: Steve Bubalo Construction Co. DATE October 10, 1990 JOB: Baker-Gisler Interceptor, fran Bristol Street to Fairview, Road Contract No. 14-1-1B SUM MU OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date September 20, 1989 Original Contract Tire 360 Calendar Days" Original Carpletion Date Novenber 4, 1990 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 13 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 373 Calendar Days Revised Crngletion Date November 17, 1990 Tice Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Coupletion Date July 5, 1990 Excluding November 18, 1989 through January 7, 1990 Original Contract Price $ 5,345,523.30 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 227,588.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ (28,641.00) Amended Contract Price $ 5.544,470.30 Board Authorization Date: October 10, 1990 COMY SANIMATICN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CAIJI7SA SUMMED BY: NIED BY: 4 Fr Eng' L( Date Cdnstruction Manager Date APPROVED PS TO FORM: Director of Engineering Date General Counsel Date ST'EVE BUHAiD CCNSITBCFICN CO. ACCEPTED BY: C �J��QQ, ,. 1 Contractor gat: "�'-z" AF-.NDA IT--M M9(r)(2) - DISTRICTS 5, 7 & 1L "V-3" RESOLUTION NO. 90-147 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 14-1-1B AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 6, 7 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 14-1-1B AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT k * * k * f * f f * f * * f * * The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Steve Bubalo Construction Co. , has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road, Contract No. 14-1-18, on July 5, 1990; and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Director of Engineering has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road, Contract No. 14-1-1B, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated September 20, 1989; and, Section 4. That the Districts' Director of Engineering is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section S. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Steve Bubalo Construction Co. , setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road, Contract No. 14-1-1B, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel ; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 6, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 7 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1990. "41" AGENDA ITEM #9(r) (71) - DISTRICTS 6, 7 & 14 "W" RESOLUTION NO. 90-149-7 APPROVING SEWER SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH CRAWFORD ITILLS ASSOCIATES RE ANNEXATION N0. 12-TO DISTRICT NO. 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SEWER SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH CRAWFORD HILLS ASSOCIATES PROVIDING FOR DEFERRED PAYMENT OF ANNEXATION ACREAGE FEES RE ANNEXATION NO. 125 - TRACT NO. 9608 TO DISTRICT NO. 7 x x x x x x x x x x x x The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, . DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Sewer Service Agreement dated October 10, 1990, by and between County Sanitation District No. 7 and Crawford Hills Associates, a California general partnership, providing for payment of annexation acreage fees by owner/developer of 182 acres of real property included in proposed Annexation No. 125 - Tract No. 9608 to County Sanitation District No. 7 in two installments, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the owner/developer shall pay annexation acreage fees for 123+ acres at the current rate of $3,795 per acre upon execution of said Sewer Service Agreement; and shall pay the balance of the annexation acreage fee due, plus interest on such balance from the date of execution of said Sewer Service Agreement at prime rate (Bank of America, San Francisco) plus 2.5 percent, for approximately 59+ acres upon the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy on developer' s property at the annexation acreage fee then currently in effect; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the. District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Sewer Service Agreement in form approved by the General Counsel . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1990. "X" AGENDA ITEM #O(s) (2) - DISTRICT 7 "X" RESOLUTION NO. 89-150-7 AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS AND FILING OF APPLICATION TO LAFCO RE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO DISTRICT NO. 7 (ANNEXATION NO. 125 - TRACT NO. 9608 ANNEXATION) AND REbUINUINU RE L T N0. 7-39-7 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS AND REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION TO THE DISTRICT OF TERRITORY KNOWN AS ANNEXATION NO. 125 - TRACT NO. 9608 ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 87-39-7 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That proceedings are hereby authorized to be initiated by District No. 7, and the Local Agency Formation Commission of Orange County is hereby requested to take proceedings for the annexation of territory designated as "Annexation No. 125 - Tract No. 9608 Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 711, the boundaries of which are more particularly described and delineated on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution, according to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth to this resolution in the manner provided by the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985; and, Section 2. That this proposal is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Division 3, commencing with Section 56000 of the California Government Code; and, Section 3. That this application is for the purpose of annexing approximately 182 acres of territory to District No. 7 in the vicinity of Chapman Avenue and Crawford Canyon Road in the City of Orange, to provide 11Y-1_" AGENDA ITEM #9(s) (3) -' DISTRICT 7 "Y-1" sanitary sewer service to said territory, which said service is not now provided by any public agency, as requested by Crawford Hills Development Co. , owner of said property; and, Section 4. That the territory to be annexed is uninhabited; and, Section 5. That this proposal is consistent with the adopted sphere of influence of the affected District; and, Section 6. That proposed Annexation No. 125 - Tract No. 9608 Annexation shall be subject to the condition that all fees required to be paid to the District must be satisfied prior to completion of the annexation proceedings; and, Section 7. That the District hereby agrees, pursuant to Section 99(h)(1) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other affected taxing agencies. Section 8. That Resolution No. 87-39-7, adopted May 13, 1987, authorizing initiation of annexation proceedings for proposed Annexation No. 125 - Tract No. 9608 to County Sanitation District No. 7, is hereby rescinded and made of no further effect. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1990. "Y-2" AGENDA ITEM M9(s) (3) - DISTRICT 7 "Y-2" RESOLUTION NO. 90-151-7 ACCEPTING GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM MR. AND MRS. ALBERT B. SCHILLING RE CONTRACT NO. 7-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ACCEPTING GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM MR. AND MRS. ALBERT B. SCHILLING IN CONNECTION WITH ABANDONMENT OF NINE DISTRICT NO. 7 PUMP STATIONS, CONTRACT NO. 7-14 k t i i t t i i t t t i i t t k t t t The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated September 10, 1990, wherein a -10-foot wide permanent ingress and egress easement through Lot No. 23 of Tract No. 3883 in the City of Santa Ana is granted to County Sanitation District No. 7 for right-of-way required in connection with Abandonment of Nine District No. 7 Pump Stations, Contract No. 7-14, is hereby accepted from Mr. and Mrs. Albert S. Schilling; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said permanent easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That payment in the amount of $1,000.00 for said right-of-way Is hereby authorized; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors is hereby authorized and directed to record said permanent Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1990. "Z" AGENDA. ITEM #°(t) - DISTRICT 7 "Z" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS `= OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA F.O. BOX 0127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92720.0127 „y 108"ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714)962-2411 September 25, 1990 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Professional Services Agreement with Dames & Moore in Connection with Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvemeents to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-3, and Miscellaneous improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P243-2 in accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee With Dames & Moore for the preparation of Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-3, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P243-2, on an hourly-rate basis including labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, suhconsultant fees and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed $460,000.00. Base Plus oral Tr Total Consultant Services, (hourly rates includuig labor plus overhead at 1808), not to exceed $305,000 $32,000 $337,000 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 5,000 5,000 n+Mons+ntant Fees, not to exceed 80,000 80,000 Fixed Profit 35,000 3,000 38,000 TOTAL COIMACP, not to exceed $425,000 $35,000 $460,000 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reascmable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/A. B. Catlin /s/William Mahoney A. B. Catlin William Mahoney Joint Chairman Vice Joint airman Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Thrnes M. Dawes Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering Selection Committee "AA" AGENDA ITEM #11(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "AA" RESOLUTION NO. 90-138 APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH DAMES & MOORE TO CONDUCT SEISMIC STUDY ELEMENT 5F JOB NOS. P1-3 -3 AND P2-43-2 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, - CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH DAMES & MOORE TO CONDUCT SEISMIC STUDY ELEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-38-3, AND SEISMIC STUDY ELEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-43-2 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with Dames & Moore to conduct Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. PI-38-2, and Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-2; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of Directors on January 10, 1990, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has negotiated and certified the final negotiated fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Professional Services Agreement dated October 10, 1990, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and Dames & l - "BB-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(r,) - ALL DISTRICTS "BB-1" Moore, to conduct Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-2, and Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-2, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows: Professional Services, at hourly rates for labor plus overhead at 180%, not to exceed $337,000.00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 5,000.00 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 80,000.00 Fixed Profit 38,000.00 TOTAL AMOUNT, not to exceed $460,000.00 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1990. "AB 2" AGENDA ITEM t111(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "BB-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA September 5, 1990 IM"EWSAVENUE P.O.Box 8127 FOUNTAIN VAMP.CAEIFORMA am `7 g1n 88¢.xa„ STAFF REPORT Summary of Draft Supplement No. 1 to Program Environmental Impact Report Re Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9 In 1989 the Directors approved the updated master plan which provided for facilities necessary to meet flow and regulatory discharge requirements for the next 30 years. Also approved was an Environmental Impact Report which addressed most of the master-planned projects. However, a few projects included within that document were only able to be addressed in a general manner and were designated as needing further review and additional CEQA documentation when the project was ready to begin the design phase. Job No. I-9, Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, is one of those projects. In February the Directors approved a professional services agreement with John Carollo Engineers to provide environmental services, preliminary and final design and construction support services for the I-9 project. The design calls for a new 120-inch diameter sewer line to transport treated wastewater within a 30-foot corridor along the westerly levee of the Santa Ana River from the Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant to the Ocean Outfall Booster Station at Treatment Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach. The new pipeline will be approximately 18,700 feet long and will replace an old 42-inch line which is over 60 years old and in poor condition. Other utilities are located in the interplant corridor and the Master Plan identified immediate and future interplant utility requirements including new pipelines for pure oxygen, industrial (reclaimed) water, sludge, interplant digester gas lines and communications facilities. The estimated cost of this project is $32 million. Located within the existing corridor are power poles which belong to Southern California Edison which will have to be relocated per our easement agreement of 1977. Staff, Edison and General Counsel are attempting to reach agreement on this issue. At Plant No. 2 there are several oil leases which have operating wells which interfere with the construction of the pipelines and they must be purchased, removed and abandoned. Authority was granted in August to enter into negotiations with the leaseholders. The Corps of Engineers in conjunction with the County of Orange have also scheduled Santa Ana River channel improvements which could conflict with the construction of this project and the possible impacts and scheduling constraints must be addressed. "CC-1" AGENDA ITEM #13 - ALL DISTRICTS "CC-1" The Draft Supplement No. 1 provides a basis to determine the effects of the proposed project on the environment and as a vehicle to coordinate this ... project with the Orange County Water District's "Green Acres" water reclamation project and the County of Orange/Corps of Engineers flood control improvement project on the Santa Ana River between the river mouth and the San Diego Freeway. The impacts of the project. are both short term caused by the construction as well as long term after completion of the project. The long-term effects include the fact that this project will facilitate population and employment increases. Those items were addressed in the 1989 Master Plan Environmental Impact Report and are not repeated in this document. Short-term effects include typical construction activity impacts, changes to the property, impacts on adjacent property owners, including streets and other public services. The Report identifies the mitigation measures to reduce the disruption. Probably the largest disruption is to the Santa Ana River bike trail which must be relocated when this and the adjacent (and concurrent) Santa Ana River Mainstem project are implemented. Staff is working with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the County of Orange to reduce and minimize the effects of this project. Together with the County of Orange EMA, a temporary facility may be required as an alternate bikeway path. The report includes the requirement that the Districts obtain encroachment permits and comply with conditions identified with the County of Orange ERA, coordinate with the Corps of Engineers, and obtain other necessary permits from regulatory agencies. Permits and easements must also be obtained from Southern California Edison, the City of Huntington Beach, the Coastal Commission, the state Department of Fish and Game, and the Division of Industrial Safety. TMD:jt a� "CC-2" AGENDA ITEM #13 - ALL DISTRICTS "CC-2" RESOLUTION NO. 90-143 OPPOSING PROPOSITION 128 -. A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS �as� OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, OPPOSING PROPOSITION 128 ON THE NOVEMBER 1990 BALLOT WHEREAS, Proposition 128, The Environmental Protection Act of 1990 (also known as the "Big Green" Initiative or the "Hayden" Initiative) on the November 1990 general election ballot is a well-intended environmental measure but, as drafted, contains many provisions that are extremely complex and technical , covers several unrelated subjects and is ill-suited for the initiative process; and, WHEREAS, Proposition 128 would, without adequate scientific basis, establish certain conditions that would significantly impact the County Sanitation Districts' programs of wastewater management, environmental and public health protection, including, but not limited to, the requirements pertaining to: • Measures relating to reducing the production of methane and carbon dioxide gas to achieve questionable global results with technology that does not currently exist, to halt so-called "Global Warmingu at a considerable annual cost; and, • Possible implementation of at least full secondary treatment of all wastewaters discharged into the marine sanctuary created by the Act (the ocean waters of the State of California) after January 1, 2000, at significant cost with no discernible benefit; and, WHEREAS, Proposition 128, because of its prescriptive requirements and its inflexibility with regard to site-specific cross-media (land, water and air) "DD-1" AGENDA ITEM #15(b) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "DD-1" needs, will impede the County Sanitation Districts' program of balanced environmental protection; and, WHEREAS, such measures could cost the County Sanitation Districts sewerage service ratepayers in excess of $50,000,000 per year with little, if any, measurable benefit to the overall environment or public health; and, WHEREAS, Proposition 128 may preclude the use of reclaimed water for landscape and agricultural irrigation, thereby freeing an equivalent amount of potable water for human consumption, an extremely important consideration in drought-ravaged California; and, WHEREAS, Proposition 128 significantly impairs effective management of California's water resources in accordance with the State's Porter-Cologne Clean Water Act which requires balancing economic and technical feasibility with all water quality objectives; and, WHEREAS, Proposition 128 creates a costly bureaucracy under the Office of the Environmental Advocate that would have broad-ranging, overlapping and contradictory powers which do not take into account the authority of existing government agencies; and would create a situation of uncertainty in terms of ultimate responsibility for enforcing environmental and public health laws; and, WHEREAS, many portions of the Proposition are redundant and unnecessary because of existing federal and state environmental regulations that already contain provisions to achieve the same environmental objectives. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED: That for the reasons hereinabove enumerated, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, oppose Proposition 128 as a costly, unnecessary and counterproductive imposition of requirements with questionable benefits that give no real consideration to balancing the economic, public health, "DD-2" AGENDA ITEM #15(b)(2) - ALL DISTRICTS "DD-2" • - f environmental and water resource needs of the citizens of California; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the State Legislature be urged to convene various scientific and technical experts to address the issues of balanced, cross-media environmental protection to determine if new legislation or changes to existing laws should be enacted to ensure that appropriate, scientifically-based, public health and environmental protection laws are passed that give due consideration to technical feasibility, economic considerations and cross-program coordination. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1990. "DD-3" AGENDA ITEM #15(b) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "DD-3" RESOLUTION NO. 90-144 APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 11 TO AGREEMENT FOR EMPLOYMENT OF GENERAL COUNSEL `.d A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AMENDMENT NO. 11 TO AGREEMENT FOR EMPLOYMENT OF GENERAL COUNSEL x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Amendment No. 11 to that certain Agreement for Employment of General Counsel dated May 1, 1975, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, and Thomas L. Woodruff, Attorney at Law, providing for an adjustment of the fee schedule for legal services performed as General Counsel for said Districts, as indicated on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution, effective November 1, 1990, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said amendment on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1990. "EE-1" AGENDA ITEM #15(b) (5) - ALL DISTRICTS "EE-1" FEE SCHEDULE FOR LEGAL SERVICES PERFORMED BY THOMAS L. WOODRUFF AS GENERAL COUNSEL EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 1, 1990 Thomas L. Woodruff - $150.00/hour Other Principals of Firm - 150.00/hour Associate Attorneys - 125.00/hour Paralegals - 65.00/hour Appearance by Counsel at conferences or meetings - 400.00/day (or $150.00/hour whichever is less) EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 90-144 "EE-2" AGENDA. ITEM #15(b) (5) - ALL DISTRICTS "EE-2" RESOLUTION NO. 90- 148 DESCRIBING A CERTAIN PROJECT, MAKING STATEMENT OF THE PUBLIC USE FOR WHICH CERTAIN PROPERTY IS TO BE TAKEN IN REFERENCE TO STATUTORY AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE SAID PROPERTY BY EMINENT DOMAIN; DESCRIBING GENERAL LOCATION AND EXTENT OF SAID PROPERTY TO BE TAKEN; DECLARING FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS ON PUBLIC INTERESTS AND NECESSITY FOR SAID PROPERTY; AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS TO BE COMMENCED IN SUPERIOR COURT TO ACQUIRE . SAID PROPERTY. INCLUDING APPLICATION FOR POSSESSION OF SAID PROPERTY PRIOR TO JUDGMENT, AND MAKING OTHER DETERMINATIONS A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 6, 7 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBING A CERTAIN PROJECT; MAKING STATEMENT OF THE PUBLIC USE FOR WHICH CERTAIN PROPERTY IS TO BE TAKEN IN REFERENCE TO STATUTORY AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE SAID PROPERTY BY EMINENT DOMAIN; DESCRIBING GENERAL LOCATION AND EXTENT OF SAID PROPERTY TO BE TAKEN; DECLARING FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS ON PUBLIC INTERESTS AND NECESSITY FOR SAID PROPERTY; AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS TO BE COMMENCED IN SUPERIOR COURT TO ACQUIRE SAID PROPERTY, INCLUDING APPLICATION FOR POSSESSION OF SAID PROPERTY PRIOR TO JUDGMENT; AND MAKING OTHER DETERMINATIONS WHEREAS, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14 of Orange County, California, are public entities organized and existing under and pursuant to the laws of the State of California and are vested with statutory authority to exercise the power of eminent domain to acquire property for public purposes; and WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors intend to undertake a certain project for public purposes; and WHEREAS, in order to accomplish the Project, the Boards of 1 "GG-1" AGENDA ITEM #30(c) - DISTRICTS 6, 7 & 14 "GG-1" Directors believe that it is necessary to acquire by eminent domain \%WWI certain property, including the right of temporary occupancy of adjacent lands for construction purposes, hereinafter collectively called "Subject Property" ; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the Code of Civil Procedure, these Boards of Directors have fixed a time and place for public hearing on the matters referred to in Section 1240. 030 of the Code of Civil Procedure; and WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors have given each person who owns or claims a right in the subject property proposed to be acquired by eminent domain whose name and address appears on the last equalized county Assessment Roll notice and a reasonable opportunity to be heard in the time, farm and manner required by Section 1245.235 of the Code of Civil Procedure; and WHEREAS, at the public hearing, the Boards of Directors did hear and consider all testimony, written and oral, to the matters referred to in Section 1240.030 of the Code of Civil Procedure. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the above Recitals are all true and correct. Section 2 . That the Subject Property to be taken by eminent domain is for a public use, to-wit: Construction of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A hereinafter referred to as the "Project" . 2 "GG-2" AGENDA ITEM #30(c) - DISTRICTS 6, 7 & 14 "GG-2" Section 3. That the Districts are authorized and empowered to commence eminent domain proceedings to acquire the Subject Property pursuant to the statutes specified as follows: (a) Sections 4740 and 4741 of the Health and Safety Code; and (b) Eminent Domain Law, being Title 7, Part III of the Code of Civil Procedure. Section 4 . That a description of the general location and extent of the Subject Property to be taken by eminent domain is set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 5. That these Boards of Directors do hereby find, determine and declare as follows: (a) That, to the extent acquisition of the Subject Property results in a remnant, such remnant shall be acquired by eminent domain herein, pursuant to Section 1230.410 of the Code of Civil Procedure; _ (b) That, to the extent. the Subject Property or interest therein is already appropriated to a public use, the use proposed herein will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it presently exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, pursuant to Section 1240.510 of the Code of Civil Procedure; and (c) That, to the extent the Subject Property or interest therein is already appropriated to a public use, the use proposed herein is a more necessary public use than the use to which the Subject Property is presently appropriated, pursuant to Section 1240. 610 of the Code of Civil procedure, or, in the .alternative, �- 3 "GG-3" AGENDA ITEM #30(c) - DISTRICTS 5, 7 & 14 "GG-3" the use proposed herein is a compatible public use which will not \� unreasonably interfere with the continuance of the existing public use, pursuant to Section 1240. 630 (a) of the Code of Civil Procedure. Section 6. The Boards of Directors further find, determine and declare as follows: (a) That the public interest and necessity require the Project; (b) That the Project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; (c) That the Subject Property sought to be acquired is necessary for said Project; and (d) That a written offer of just compensation has been made to the owners of record of the Subject Property in the time, form and manner required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code. Section 7. That Rourke & Woodruff, General Counsel for the Districts, are hereby authorized and directed to commence an action in the Superior Court of the State of California, for the County of Orange, in the name and on behalf of one or more of the Districts, against those persons who appear of record or who are known to have a claim or interest in the Subject Property described in Exhibit "A" for the purpose of acquiring the Subject Property by eminent domain for the public use described herein and to make application for possession of the Subject Property prior to judgment. 4 "GG-4" AGENDA ITEM #30(c) - DISTRICTS 6, 7 & 14 "GG-4" ♦ a q Section 8. That the officers of the Districts are hereby authorized and directed to withdraw necessary sums to deposit with the Superior Court as the probable amount of compensation that will be awarded in the eminent domain proceedings to acquire the Subject Property described in Exhibit "A" . Section 9. That the officers of the Districts are hereby authorized and directed to take any appropriate action consistent with the purposes of this Resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held October 10, 1990. (q\547.cj*) 5 "GG-5" AGENDA ITEM #30(c) - DISTRICTS 5, 7 & 14 "GG-5" ^ s , �I EXHIBIT "A" DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY "GG-6" AGENDA ITEM #30(c) - DISTRICTS 6, 7 R 14 "GG-6" Parcel 1-1 A permanent sewer easement over property described as follows: That portion of Parcel 3 in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange, State of California, as shown on a map filed in Book 68, Page 50 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, together with that portion of Parcel 2 as shown on a map filed in Book 89, Page 50 of Parcel Maps in said county records office described as follows: The easterly 25.00 feet of the westerly 43.00 feet of said Parcels 3 .and 2, the westerly line of which bears North 0 degrees 40 feet 3 inches West a distance of 478.50 feet. EXHIBIT A-1 "GG-7" AGENDA ITEM #30(c) - DISTRICTS G, 7 & 14 "GG-7" Parcel 1-2 A temporary construction easement over property described as follows: That portion of Parcel 3 in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange, state of California, as shown on a map filed in Book 68, Page 50 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, together with that portion of Parcel 2 as shown on a map filed in Book 89, Page 50 of Parcel Maps in said county records office described as follows: The westerly 18.00 feet of said Parcels 3 and 2, the westerly line of which bears North 0 degrees 40 feet 03 inches West a distance of 478. 5 feet and; the easterly 25.53 feet of said Parcel 3 and; the easterly 17. 00 feet of the westerly 60.00 feet of said Parcel 2. AGENDA ITEM #30(c) - DISTRICTS 6, 7 & 14 "GG-8" EXHIBIT A-2 Parcel 2-1 A permanent sewer easement over property described as follows: That portion of Parcel "C" within Sections 4 and 5 of Township 6 South, Range 10 West in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange, State of California, as described in a deed recorded in Book 11536, Page 46, Official Records of said County described as follows: Beginning at a point on the centerline of Gisler Avenue, said point being the most northwesterly corner of Tract No. 3363, as shown on a map recorded in Book 112, page. 37 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the County Recorder of said County; thence South 0.00-23" east 35.00 along the westerly line of said tract to a point on the southerly right-of-way line of Gisler Avenue being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 75.58 -13" West 103.80 feet; thence North 89.59-37" West 648.78 feet; thence North 83.55116" West 236.33 feet to a point on said southerly line of Gisler Avenue; thence South 89.59137" East 983.78 feet along said southerly line to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. "6G-9" AGENDA ITEM #30(c) - DISTRICTS 6. 7 & 14 "GG-9" E88IBIT A-3 b � � Parcel 2-2 A temporary construction easement over property described as follows: That portion of Parcel "C" within Sections 4 and 5 of Township 6 South Range 10 West, in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange, State of California, as described in a deed recorded in Book 11536, Page 46, Official Records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the centerline of Gisler Avenue, said point being the most northwesterly corner of Tract No. 3363, as shown on a map recorded in Book 112, Page 37 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the County Recorder of said County; thence South 0.00123" West 25. 00 feet along said westerly tract line; thence South 75.58113" West 103.08 feet; thence North 89.59137" West 648.78 feet; thence North 77.58 - 56" West 240.26 feet to a point on said southerly line Of Gisler Avenue; thence South 83.55116" East 286.33 feet; thence South 89.59137" east 648.78 feet along a line parallel with and distant 25.00 feet southerly from said southerly line of Gisler Avenue; thence North 78.58113" east 103 .08 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. "GG-10" AGENDA ITEM #30(C) - DISTRICTS 6, 7 & 14 "GG-10" EXHIBIT A-4 Parcel 3 A permanent sewer easement over property described as follows: Those portions in the Southeast quarter of Section 32 and the Southwest quarter of Section 33, in Township 5 South, Range 10 West, in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows: Parcel A A strip of land, 20 feet in width, the Easterly line of which is described- as follows: Beginning at the Southwesterly corner of Tract Map No. 6693, said corner being a point on the centerline of Gisler Avenue distant 331.00 feet due West thereon from the intersection . with the centerline of Iowa Street as shown on said Tract map, said point also being on the common boundary with the Easterly line of the land of the Southern California Edison Company (SCE) as described in a deed recorded in Book 3588, Page 491, Official Records of said County; thence Northeasterly along said common boundary and along a curve concave Southeasterly of radius 22,668.30 feet through a central angle of 03.40'2l" and a distance of 1,452.98 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING to which a radial line bears North 64.36-42" West; thence continuing along said common boundary North 28.56156" East 621.33 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as "POINT All. Parcel B Beginning at point "A" described hereinabove; thence leaving said common boundary North 61.03104" West 75.00 feet to a point on the Westerly line of said SCE property, said line being the common boundary with the land of the Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) as described in a deed recorded in Book 1690, Page 408, Official Records of said County; thence continuing along said common boundary North 28.56156" East 150.00 feet; thence leaving said common boundary South 61.03104" East 75.00 feet to a point on said common boundary of the Easterly line of the land of SCE with Tract Map No. 6693, said point being hereinafter referred to as "POINT B" ; thence along said Easterly SCE line South 28.56'56" "GG-11" AGENDA ITEM p30(c) - DISTRICTS 6, 7 & 14 "GG-11" EXHIBIT A-5 West 150. 00 feet to the Point of Beginning. Parcel C A strip of land, 15 feet in width, the Easterly line of which is described as follows: Beginning at point "B" described hereinabove; .. thence along said common boundary between the land of SCE and tract Map No. 6693 North 28.56156" East 482 feet to the Northwesterly corner of lot 37 as shown on said Tract Map, said point also being on the Southerly line of an Easement to the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) as described in a deed recorded in Book 1151, Page 216, Official Records of said County'. The Westerly sideline of said parcel shall be prolonged, continued, or shortened at the northwesterly terminus so as to terminate on the Southerly line of said CSDOC Easement. Parcel D Beginning at the intersection of the Easterly boundary of the land granted to the Southern California Edison Company in a deed recorded in Book 3588, Page 491, Official Records of said County and the centerline of Gisler Avenue, said intersection point being distant 331.00 feet due west of the centerline intersection of Gisler Avenue and Iowa Street; thence Northeasterly along said Easterly boundary 44.29 feet along a curve concave Southeasterly of radius 22,668.30 feet through a central angle of 00.06143" to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence due west 50. 00 feet; thence North 24.00100" East 80. 00 feet; thence North 49.00100" East 119. 16 feet to a point on the Easterly boundary of said Edison land; thence Southwesterly along said Easterly boundary 167.73 feet along a curve concave Southeasterly of radius 22, 668.30 feet through a central angle of 00.25 '26" to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. V� "GG-12" AGENDA ITEM #30(C) - DISTRICTS 5, 7 & 14 "Gf,-.l2" EXHIBIT A-6 COUNTY SANITATION ` DISTRICTS NOS. 19 2, 39 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON SEPTEMBER 12, 1990 PN1 10* Y 6 µoV°tlWy O S O 9n I �' na O y I ORq 'GE tsb COV ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ;.r ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on September 12, 1990, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: x James A. Wahner, Chairman Dram Crank Charles E. Puckett, Chai neon pro tan xRichard B. Edgar 7—Dan Griset Dan Young x Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 2: x Iry Pickler, Chairman Fred Hunter z James Neal, Chairman pro tem —George Scott x Roland E. Bigonger —Henry W. Wedaa z A.B. -Buck- Catlin —Chris Norby 7—Dan Griset —_Dan Young x William D. Mahoney _Beth Graham =Robert H. Main Norman Culver x Carrey Nelson Wayne Wedin x Arthur G. Newton _Norman Z. Eckenrode a Wayne Silzel _Harold Saldarini =Don E. Smith Fred Barrera x Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 3: x Richard Polls, Chairman _Eva G. Miner xJ.R. -Bob- Siefen, Chairman pro tem _Dewey Wiles x Edward L. Allen David J. Shawver x Margaret M. Arnold _Cecilia L. Age x Wes Bannister Peter Green x A.B. "Buck" _ Catlin _Chris Norby x Norman Culver _Robert H. Main x Beth Graham _William 0. Mahoney x Don R. Griffin _Donna L. Chessen 7—Dan Griset _Dan Young x James Neal _George Scott x Carrey Nelson Mayne Wedin x _ lry Pickler _Fred Hunter x Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth x Charles Sylvia _Robert Wahlstrom x Edna Wilson Frank Laszlo ' DISTRICT NO. 5: x Evelyn Hart, Chairman Ruthelyn Plummer Phil Sansone, Chairman pro tem -7—John C. Cox. Jr. 7—Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton DISTRICT N0. 6: x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman _Evelyn Hart =James Wahner, Chairman pro tan James M. Ferryman 7--Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 7: x Don E. Smith, Chairman _Fred Barrera x Richard Edgar, Chairman pro tem —Charles meCharles E. Puckett x John C. Cox, Jr. Ruthelyn PI unr = _ Dan Griset Dan Young x Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton x Sally Anne Sheridan Barry Hammond x James Wahner _Harry Green DISTRICT NO. 11: Grace Winchell, Chairman x Peter Green x Tam Mays, Chairman pro tan Jim Silva x Roger Stanton _Don R. Rath DISTRICT NO. 13: x Henry W. Wedaa, Chairman Roland E. Bigonger _Wayne Wedin, Chairman pro tam =Carrey Nelson x Iry Pickler Fred Hunter -7--Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton x Don E. Smith Fred Barrera `../ DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chairman _Darryl Miller -7-Sally Anne Sheridan, Chairman pro tan Barry Hammond -7—Leslie A. Pontious —Richard B. Edgar 7—Don R. Roth —Roger Stanton -7—Don E. Smith _Fred Barrera 2 09/12/90 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita J. Brown, Board Secretary, Blake P. Anderson, Thomas 'M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Corinne Clawson, Penny Kyle, Charles Nichols, Jack Vincent, Patti Gorczyca, Gary Hasenstab, �✓ Adriana Renescu, Jo Klak OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel , Clark Ide, Jamel Demir, Wait Howard, Bill Knopf, Kris Lindstrom, Phil Stone, Tom Richardson, J. A. Catalano x x x x x x x x x x x x x ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman reported that a Report of he Joint Chairman District 2 Selection Committee was scheduled to meet on Wednesday, September 19th, at 4:30 p.m. He announced that a Directors' Workshop on Debt Financing would be held on Wednesday, September 19th, at 5:30 p.m. Mr. Catlin advised that the Fiscal Policy Committee was scheduled to meet on Thursday, September 20th, at 5:30 p.m. He also noted that a Joint Works Selection Committee was scheduled to meet on Tuesday, September 25th, at 11:30 a.m. The Joint Chairman then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, September 26th, at 5:30 p.m. , and invited Directors Wayne Silzel and Edward Allen to attend and participate in the discussions. Chairman Catlin also reported that the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee was scheduled to meet on Thursday, September 27th, at 5:30 p.m. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that in Report of the General Manager response to Directors' requests for additional information on municipal debt financing, a workshop on debt financing had been scheduled for Wednesday, September 19th, at 5:30 p.m. He advised that staff and representatives of the underwriters and bond counsel would be making presentations and would be available for questions. Mr. Sylvester requested that Directors complete the form included in their meeting folders indicating whether or not they planned to attend this workshop. Mr. Sylvester also commented on a letter included in the Directors' meeting folders from the Regional Water Quality Control Board expressing appreciation to the Districts for their cooperation and assistance in ' connection with the cleanup of a spill of asphalt sealing material into the East Garden Grove - Wintersburg Channel in July. He pointed out that the . services provided by staff were in keeping with the Districts' policy of cooperating with all state and local agencies in environmental matters. -3- 09/12/90 The General Manager then called the Directors' attention to a newspaper article which was published in the San Diego Union in connection with the ongoing controversy relative to the appropriate level of treatment of wastewater to be discharged into the ocean in the San Diego area. He noted V that the City of San Diego had applied for a waiver from secondary treatment requirements pursuant to Section 301(h) of the Federal Water Clean Water Act, but had subsequently withdrawn their application. There has been considerable press on the issue recently including testimony from several scientists that expressed their belief that full secondary treatment was unnecessary and a waste of public funds. The article indicated that the City was reconsidering the waiver and that the County of San Diego had joined in support of renewing the application. The Federal Court will be reconsidering the consent decree between the City, the State of California and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency that requires full secondary treatment. Mr. Sylvester added a relevant note that a committee has been established by the National Research Council to study the impact of wastewater management activities in coastal urban areas, and advised that the Districts' Director of Technical Services has been appointed to this committee. Mr. Sylvester then advised that he was pleased to report that the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) had presented the Districts with the 1989 "Gold" award for their consistent compliance with all terms and conditions of their wastewater discharge requirements. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that a Receive and file letter from communication had been received from Orange County Tax Collector- the Orange County Treasurer-Tax . Treasurer re interest earned on Collector on the investment of Districts' investments durin reserve funds which indicated that Pascal year 1 the total interest earned on their investments of the Districts' funds for fiscal year 1989-90 was $19.7 million, a net yield of 9.02%. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the letter from the County Treasurer-Tax Collector, dated August 10, 1990, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 8, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 8, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or Approval of nu es amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 8, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or �..r Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 8, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -4- UVI LZIYU DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or pproval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 8, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 8, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 8, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meetings held July 11, 1990 and August 8, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 8, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of a ent of Joint an In v duo istrict aims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A", "B", "C" and "D" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 7/04/90 7/18/90 DISTRICT NO. 13 (Carried over from 8/08/90 Mtg.) -0- $ 85.00 8/01/90 8/15/90 8/29/90 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 1,070,523.05 $ 691,508.67 $ 923,796.52 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 7,678,772.93 180,397.13 7,027,301.19 Joint Working Capital Fund - 133,149.36 129,677.93 162,306.31 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 196,040.66 9,792.72 12,781.28 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 34.77 -0- 1,085.63 DI RIS�CT N!2 - 217,793.46 167,018.66 8,289.84 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 216,850.54 15,729.01 594,675.17 DISI� T - 694,908.69 28,569.57 250,352.81 DISTRICT NU—. 6 - 830.36 182.00 27.84 DISTRICT - 197,496.78 16,149.46 52,353.73 DISTRDISTR—I�1 - 97.06 13,081.38 639.09 DISTRICT N� - -0- -0- -0- DISTR� - 127,842.12 16,659.39 142,608.22 DISTRICTS-NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 3,679.87 -0- 4,901.43 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 3,589.59 -0- 32.10 DISTRICT NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 5,382.92 8.92 3,919.69 10,546,992.16 1,268,774.84 9,185,07 .85 -5- 9112/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin Chao a rder No. 1 to the plans an specifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans Jab Na. J-24 and specifications for Installation of Replacement Influent Meters, Job No. J-24, authorizing an addition of $18,227.37 to the contract with P. R. Burke Industrial Corporation for two items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 4 to the plans Job No. P1-33 and specifications for Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33, authorizing an addition of $87,272.00 to the contract with Gust K. Newberg Construction Company for four items of additional work, and granting a time extension of six calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 5 to the tans and specifications re That Change Order No. 5 to the plans Job No. PI- 3 and specifications for Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33, authorizing an addition of $608,121.00 (to be paid by Orange County Water District) to the contract with Gust K. Newberg Construction Company for one item of additional work, and granting a time extension of eight calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin Change Order No. 4 to the p ans and specifications re That Change Order No. 4 to the plans Job No. P1-34-2 and specifications for Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-2, authorizing an addition of $58,066.57 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. for eight items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate a Professional That the Selection Committee be, and Services Agreement with K. P. is hereby, authorized to negotiate a Lindstrom, Inc. for environmental Professional Services Agreement with consulting services K. P. Lindstrom, Inc. for environmental consulting services to assist staff on NPDES Permit activities; regulatory and legislative liaison activities; and for technical support for sludge management, air quality, reclamation and conservation issues and in connection with CEQA compliance for Master Plan projects. -6- 09/12/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin Professiona Services A regiment w Gordon W. Hot or That the Boards of Directors hereby specialized consultin en ineerin adopt Resolution No. 90-117, approving services re ne otiat n a rate Professional Services Agreement with structure agreement with 5CEC Gordon w. Hoyt for specialized consulting engineering and negotiating services to assist staff in negotiating a rate structure agreement with Southern California Edison Company in connection with the Districts' new Central Power Generation Systems at Plants 1 and 2, on an hourly-rate basis, for a total fee not to exceed $50,000.00 plus out-of-pocket expenses. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adopting procedure for destruction of obsolete records That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-118, pertaining to the procedure for destruction of obsolete records and repealing the. inconsistent provisions of all other resolutions previously adopted by these Boards of Directors with respect to destruction of obsolete records. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing renewal ,of membership in the Santa Ana River Flood That renewal of membership in the Protection Agency SARFPA Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency (SARFPA) for fiscal year 1990-91, be, and is hereby, authorized; and, FURTHER MOVED: That payment of membership dues in the amount of $1,400.00, be, and is hereby, authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amending Classification an Compensation Resolution No. 7 - That the Boards of Directors hereby as amended, re mana ement and adopt Resolution No. 90-133, amending sa ary rang supervisory e Classification and Compensation adjustments Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, re management and supervisory salary range adjustments. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Actions relative to approval of new master-planned treatment plant construction projects Job Nos. J-19-1, P1-34-3 & P1-35-2F Verbal staff report The Districts' Director of Engineering gave a brief overview . of three upcoming treatment plant construction projects. Central Generation Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-19-1, is one of several phases of work for central power generation systems at both �. -7- 09/12/90 treatment plants which started in 1984 with the preparation of a digester gas utilization study. This project evolved through studies and consultations with Directors, regulatory agencies and various consultants. When complete, these facilities will fully utilize the energy value of the Districts' digester gas, a by-product of sewage `./ treatment, by using it as fuel in new state-of-the-art, clean-burn internal combustion engines to power generators which will produce electricity to operate the treatment plants. The generated power will have an estimated value of about $9 million per year and will almost fully offset purchases of power from Southern California Edison. He noted that the engineer's estimate for this work is $16 million. Mr. Dawes further reviewed the status of projects authorized by the Directors as part of the Master Plan program to maintain and increase treatment capacity at Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley. The projects now ready for approval include construction of six new sludge digesters (Job No. P1-34-3) and the rehabilitation of the two remaining older digesters (Job No. P1-35-2) , to provide the added facilities necessary to process increasing sludge volumes. It was pointed out that the engineer's estimate for these two projects is $33 million. A rovin tans and specifications Moved, seconded and duly carried: or o No. J-1 -1 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-115, approving plans and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. `../ A rovin tans and s ecifications Moved, seconded and duly carried: for 05 Nos. 1-34-3 and P1-35-2 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-116, approving plans and specifications for Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-3, and Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-2, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re upplemen No. 1 to Pro ram Environmental Im act Report for Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan re Job No. I-9 Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering reported that 1n 1989 the Directors approved the updated Master Plan which provided for facilities necessary to meet flow increases and regulatory discharge requirements for the next 30 years. Also approved was an Environmental Impact Report which addressed most of the master-planned projects. However, three projects included in that document were only able to be addressed in a general manner and were designated as needing further review and additional CEQA documentation when the project was ready to begin the design phase. The Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9, is one of those projects. -8- 09/12/90 The project includes a new 120-inch sewer outfaii that will deliver treated effluent from Plant No. 1 to the ocean outfail booster stations at Plant No. 2. Also included is utility piping and communication cables. Mr. Dawes reviewed the actions taken thus far with regard to CEQA requirements. He advised that the Draft Supplement No. 1 addresses both the short-term construction effects and the long-term effects of the project. He noted that of one item of concern that would be addressed was keeping the bicycle trail open along the Santa Ana River levee during construction of this project. He further advised that a public hearing was scheduled for October 10, 1990 relative to said Draft Supplement No. 1. Receive and file comments received Moved, seconded and.duly carried: on the Notice of Pre oration of Supplement No. 1 to said E R That the comments received on the Notice of Preparation of Supplement No. 1 to said EIR be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file Staff Re ort and Moved, seconded and duly carried: Draft upp ement No. 1 to UK That the Staff Report dated September 5, 1990 and Draft Supplement No. 1 to said EIR be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. Authorizing the General Manager to Moved, seconded and duly carried: file a Notice of Com let ton of Draft Supplement No. 1 to UX That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to file a Notice of Completion of Draft Supplement No. 1 to said EIR. Fixin the date time and lace for Moved, seconded and duly carried: u is hearin on Draf Sup u lenient No. 1 to E R That October 10, 1990, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Office, be, and are hereby, fixed as the date, time and place for public hearing on Draft Supplement No. 1 to said EIR. Establishing October 30, 1990 as Moved, seconded and duly carried: the final tlate for receipt of comments on Draft upplement No. 1 That October 10, 1990, be, and is To EIR hereby, established as the final date for which all comments must be received on Draft Supplement No. 1 to said EIR. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Creating 1990 Construction Funds That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt the following Resolutions creating a 1990 Construction Fund in each respective District: District Resolution No. , 1 90-120-1 2 90-121-2 3 90-122-3 5 90-123-5 6 90-124-6 7 _ 90-125-7 11 . 90-126-I1 Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. -9- 9/12/90 ALL DISTRICTS Staff was requested to assess the Requesting staff o assess the impact of SB 2557, adopted as part of impact or Su 2557 re Pro ert ax the last=minute 1990-91 Administration ee budget-balancing agreement between the Governor and the legislature that `..� would allow counties to charge other local governments for the costs of property tax administration, and report back to the Boards. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Atl ournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:59 p.m., September 12, 1990. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ad ournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:59 p.m., September 12, 1990. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: stablishin 1 - 1 char es for Class lass II antl Class 1II That the Board of Directors hereby Industrial Waste oermittees adopts Resolution No. 90-109-13, establishing 1990-91 charges for Class I, Class II and Class III permittees, pursuant to provisions of the uniform Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, as follows: 1990-91 INDUSTRIAL USER RATES Class I 8 II Fee Class III Fee low * * .D. * low $430.64 $154.58 $120.98 $1,005.17 *Flow - Per million gallons of flow *S.S. - Per thousand pounds of suspended solids *B.O.O. - Per thousand pounds of biochemical oxygen demand Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:00 p.m., September 12, 1990. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin um Addend o. to he rofessiona ervice2 Agreement That the Selection Committee wlth Willdan Associates far design certification of the final negotiated and construction services re ui red fee relative to Addendum No. 2 to the re ontract Nos. - 6-3 and 2- Professional Services Agreement with Willdan Associates for design of Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-3 (including City of Anaheim Street Improvements), and Katella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street (Ninth) , Contract No. 2-28, providing for additional design services necessary to `.� incorporate changes recommended by CALTRANS and the Cities of Anaheim and - Fullerton, and for other miscellaneous changes required re Contract No. 2-26-3, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, -10- 09/12/90 FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 90-128-2, approving Addendum No. 2 to the agreement with Willdan Associates for said additional services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses and fixed profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $51,500.00, increasing the total authorized —� compensation from $145,578.50 to an amount not to exceed $197,078.50. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Director Don R. Roth requested that his abstention from voting on these motions be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 2 Actions re approval of addendum to tans and s ecifications and award of ontract Nos. 2-26-3 -28 and T-797-og'Feve Bu alo Construction Co. Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering gave an overview of the District 2 master-planned facilities which have been under design and construction for a number of years. He pointed out on aerial maps the projects completed thus far and the proposed alignments of Contract Nos. 2-26-3, 2-28 and 2-29. Mr. Dawes explained that the projects were combined for bidding purposes to realize cost savings inasmuch as most of the pipe Is the same size. Contract No. 2-26-3, Portion of Euclid Interceptor between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue, will include City of Anaheim street improvements on Euclid Street between La Palma Avenue and the 91 Freeway, in accordance with a cooperative agreement with the City. The Katella Relief Sewer, Contract No. 2-28, will connect the Euclid Interceptor Sewer to the South Anaheim Sewer extending from Euclid Street and Katella Avenue about one-half mile east to Ninth Street, relieving the South Anaheim Sewer and the downstream Newhope-Placentia Trunk Sewer. Mr. Dawes added that the Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29, will also help to relieve the Newhope-Placentia Sewer in State College Boulevard by diverting flows to the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer. The Director of Engineering reported that seven bids had been received and recommended award to the low bidder in the amount of $7,953,755.00. Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: lams and s ecifications re ontract os. 2-26-3, -28 and 2-29 That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Portion of Euclid Interceptor, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-3 (including City of Anaheim Street Improvements) ; Katella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street (Ninth Street) , Contract No. 2-28; and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29, clarifying traffic requirements and bonus/penalty provisions, be, and is hereby, approved. -11- �/ 09/12/90 Awardin Contract Nos. 2-26-3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: antl - o eve Buba o Construction Co. That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 90-127-2, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Portion of Euclid Interceptor, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-3 (including City of Anaheim Street Improvements) ; Katella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street (Ninth Street), Contract No. 2-28; and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29, to Steve Bubalo Construction Co. in the total amount of $7,953,755.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:07 p.m. , September 12, 1990. DISTRICTS 3 & 11 Actions re agreements between Districts 7 and 11 and with .John Carollo Engineers for financing an design of master-planned sewage system improvements Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering reported that in June 1989 the Directors approved a Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for preparation of a Project Report relative to Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17. The current system is at capacity and improvements have been held in abeyance pending the outcome of discussions with property owners of the Bolsa Chica area concerning annexation of the area to District No. 11. The owners have apparently decided not to annex at this time. Included in the Project Report, which was approved by the Boards in May 1990, was a cost-sharing formula for financing and provisions establishing each District's capacity ownership of the proposed facilities, based on anticipated annexation of the Bolsa Chica area to District 11. Originally, the cost-sharing agreement provided for a net payment of $630.836.00 by District 3 to District 11. However, Mr. Dawes further reported that inasmuch as the property owners of Bolsa Chica have decided not to proceed with annexation to the District, District 3 will own a larger share of the system capacity now, and, therefore, the payment amount to District 11 must be revised to $699,636.00. He noted that the revised agreement listed on the agenda provided for this change in capacity ownership of the respective Districts. Directors questioned whether there was a possibility the new landowners of the Bolsa Chica area would change their mind regarding annexation to the District. Staff advised that for months they had attempted to meet with the new owners to resolve the question of annexation but that they had been totally unresponsive. However, a meeting had finally been set for the following day, September 13th. He stated that there would be no advantage to deferring the recommended actions listed on the agenda until after that meeting because the project is urgently needed. However, Mr. Dawes stated that if the staff's recommendations change after the meeting, the matter would be returned to the Boards for further action, if necessary. -12- 09/12/90 The Director of Engineering also reported that the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for preparation of a Project Report relative to Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements provided for negotiations with the consultant for design and construction support services relative to the Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17. He pointed out that this work is included in proposed Addendum No. 1 to the Agreement for preparation of the Project Report, but in many ways it is a complete new project including design, preparation of plans and specifications, surveying and other construction support services which is the reason for the large adjustment. Mr. Dawes recommended approval of said addendum. A rovin rd Agreement between Moved, seconded and duly carried: Districts andevise 11 proviaing for fina nc n desi n construction That the Boards of Directors ca act ownersh and 05 eration of hereby adopt Resolution certain sewage collection No. 90-129, approving revised facilities Agreement between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 3 and 11 providing for financing, design, construction, capacity ownership and operation of certain master-planned sewage collection facilities for serving Districts 3 and 11; and rescinding Resolution No. 90-53 adopted by the Boards on May 9, 1990. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. A rovin Addendum No. 1 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: Professional ervices A regiment with John Carollo Engineers for That the Selection Committee pre rration�of Pro act Re ort re certification of the final ontra� cf it-1 providing or negotiated fee relative to design of said project Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for preparation of Phase 1 Preliminary Project Report for Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, providing for final design of Contract No. 11-17 and construction support services re said project, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-130, approving Addendum No. 1 to said Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for said additional services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses and fixed profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $649,383.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $44,738.00 to an amount not to exceed $694,121.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m. , September 12, 1990. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m. , September 12, 1990. -13- 09/12/90 DISTRICTS 6 7 8 14 Actions re Ba er- sler In erce or from Fairview Road to Plant o. Contract No. 14-1-IA Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering reported that in July 1990 the Boards certified Supplement No. 1 to the EIR for Proposed Formation of District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13, pertaining to the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Contract Nos. 14-1-1A and 14-1-1B, and Baker Force Mains, Contract No. 14-1-2, and approved the projects for construction. The Supplement addressed the changes to the project since conception, as well as identifying final alignment and pipe size. Mr. Dawes reviewed the recommended alignment of Contract No. 14-1-2 and pointed out that in accordance with the requirements of the City of Costa Mesa, the sewer could not go through Harbor Boulevard. He advised that three property owners had objected to the proposed sewer alignment through their property. Staff and General Counsel have been unable to negotiate the purchase of easements necessary from these three property owners required for construction of Contract No. 14-1-1A. Mr. Dawes added that one of the property owners, the Mesa Verde Country Club, had filed a legal action against the Districts challenging the Districts' actions relative to compliance with CEQA requirements re aproval of Supplement No. 1 to said EIR. He pointed out that the two actions listed on the agenda were independent of each other even though they both pertain to Contract No. 14-1-1A. Mr. Dawes reported that the General Counsel had determined that eminent `../ domain action may be the only recourse if continued negotiations were unsuccessful. Receive and file Memorandum from Moved, seconded and duly carried: General Counsel That the Memorandum from General Counsel dated September 5, 1990, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file Petition for Writ Moved, seconded and duly carried: of Mandate and Application for Injunctive Relief, Mesa Verde That the Petition for Writ of Coun try b vs. ounty Sanitation Mandate and Application for Districts of Orange ount Injunctive Relief, Mesa Verde California, case No. 634660 Country Club vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, Case No. 634680, relative to compliance with CEQA requirements in connection with Districts' approval of Supplement No. 1 to the EIR for Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13, required to assess the impacts resulting from the final designed alignment of Contract Nos. 14-1-1A, 14-1-1B and 14-1-2, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. -14- 09/12/90 Fixin the date time and lace Moved, seconded and duly carried: or u c earn on the adoption of a Reso ution of Necessity re That the Boards of Directors acquisi on of property by eminent hereby adopt Resolution domain No. 90-131, pertaining to setting the time and place for a public hearing on the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity to order the acquisition of certain property by eminent domain required in connection with the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A. (Hearing Date: October 10, 1990, at 7:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative Office). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: iournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:20 p.m., September 12, 1990. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 134 - ou hwest uiversirled Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 90-134-7, ordering annexation of 28.735 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the northwest corner of Santiago Canyon Road and Windes Drive in unincorporated County territory (Annexation No. 134 - Southwest Diversified Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 135 - Williams Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 90-135-7, ordering annexation of 2.50 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the southeast corner of Lemon Heights Drive and Lower Lake Drive in unincorporated County territory (Annexation No. 135 - Williams Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 1 Gable Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 90-136-7, ordering annexation of 2.805 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Cowan Heights Drive and Overhill Drive in unincorporated County territory (Annexation No. 138 - Gable Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 7 A 14 Actions relative to approval o_f —fans and s ecifications for ont ract 14-1- Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering reported that the Board had previously awarded a contract for a portion of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, between Bristol Street and Fairview Road, Contract No. 14-1-1B, which was nearly complete. The second reach, Contract No. 14-1-1A (between Fairview Road and Reclamation Plant No. 1) is currently awaiting acquisition of several easements necessary for construction. -15- 09/12/90 He further reported that in April 1990 Directors approved an agreement with the County of Orange relating to the acquisition of permanent and temporary easements in the Jahn Wayne Airport Main Street parking lot for construction and operation of the Baker Force Mains, from Main Street Pump Station to Bristol Street, Contract No. 14-1-2. The project was designed with dual force mains to minimize long-term pumping costs while providing the reliability of a second conduit should one fail . Included within this two-mile long project is a tunnel under the San Diego Freeway from the west side of John Wayne Airport property to the pump station. Mr. Dawes advised that the engineer's estimate for this work is $7 million. Approving plans and specifications Moved, seconded and duly carried: far Contract No. 14-1-2 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-132, approving plans and specifications for Baker Force Mains, from Main Street Pump Station to Bristol Street, Contract No. 14-1-2, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:23 p.m., September 12, 1990. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:23 p.m., September 12, 1990. Secretary of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 v./ -16- FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKINS CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/12/96 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OFAN6F COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 67/18/90 POSTING DATE 07/18/90 WARRANT NO. V NQ OP AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 1GP317 WATERMAN SUPPLY S39R.44 CHAIN _.__14Fi18-_ YEIR OIL CO. 8241119 BHPIIND UkER FEE OVERPAYMENT _ 108319 - WESTERN PACIFIC EQUIPMENT CO. $451.84 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 158329 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY $37,536.37 CAUSTIC SODA N.O. 8-9-89 .._._109121. ______._..YEHG9_ i.24.6.R6. ELECTRIC PABT 10A322 REROR COPF. $7.192.36 COPIER LEASES 168323 GEORGE YARDLEY COMPANY $397.30 VALVE PARTS ___aAE12i —EYER ETT N._T-QPK CO. f',lj_2 5A ENGINE PARTS _ 108325 LUCY ZAHRAN. INC. S5,250.00 1/17 RACK-UP CLAIM TOTAL CLAIMS FAID -.7/18/90 S6,5J4.635.51 SUMMARY - -- AMOUNT m= F1 OPEN FUND _ $ 750.00 !1 OONST FUND _ --- -- - ---- 1,075,501.41 Co_ 72 OPER FUND 12.054.87 02 CAP FAC FUND _ 441.43 02 CONST POND ----- 1,928,951.05 _ 03 OPER FUND 14.049.63 03 CAP_FAC FUND _2,045_74 _ !3 CONST FUND 2,090,662.65 F5 OPEN FUND 4,382.56 05 CAP FAC FUND 4,364.12 .---i6 OPEN FUND -- � ---- 525.75 P7 OPEN FOND 11.173.64 _07.CAP FAC FUND 42.237.95 --- 1,573.51 113 OPEN FUND 85.01) 14. OPER FUND 2 . _ _ i14 CAP FAC FUND - -- - --- ------ 3.850.46 0566 OPER FUND 5.537.99 JT OPER FORD 729,738.03 _- SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FUND 17,122.96 _ JT DIST WORKING, CAPITAL FUND 191,899.56 S 6,504,635.51 FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/26/9G PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 108344 4019SON UNIFORM 1 EQUIP. $2.451.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES 106345 ADVANCED COMPUTER PRODUCTS.IKC SBE6.43 COMPUTER HARDWARE ----lT.�T�BI rTalf "ODNST0.DCfIDN"F1=3A=� 108347 AIR PRODUCTS R CHEMICAL INC. $30,728.34 DAN AGREEMENT - OXYGEN GEN SYSTEM M.0.8-9-69 108348 LEASING ASSOCIATES/ALLSTATE $1.333.32 AUTO LEASES _ . r------------------TASTR-AMENT PART 108359 ANEMICAN CRANE INSTITUTE S2.800.00 TRAINING CLASS 1011351 AMERICAN FLEET PARTS $22.25 TRUCK PARTS SE7ES'---_. _—�zi 39839— '[�CR6RICAt�A0.T 108353 AMER. SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLGT $65.80 MEIRIERSHIP Bag 105354 AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY $758.56 FILM _ A 1411356 ARCO VALVE G PRIMER CORP S945.63 VALVE 108357 APPLE ONE S1.119.20 TEMPORARY SERVICES 17G­__ —351�.000CBAN-SAMPLING 108359 ARI20NA INSTRUMENT $154.90 INSTRUMENT REPAIR 108360 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CO. 16.250.84 TRUCK PARTS fTl 198362 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $119.922.96 GRIT REMOVAL M.0.7-13-88 X IOB36] BRY SAFETY 0 SUPPLY $1,646.68 SAFETY SUPPLIES py 108365 SANCROFT-WHITNEY CO. 301.66 PUBLICATION 108366 P.Y. BAROTTI AND ASSOC• 16.562.50 CONSTRUCTION PI-34-2,P2-37 - w 108368 BAXTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $2.653.15 LAS SUPPLIES - 1 108369 BAYLESS STATIONERS $75.57 OFFICE SUPPLIES --- bENGINE 108372 .HOVARO BLEVINS $200.80 DEFERRM COMP DISTRIBUTION 108372 BLUE DIAMOND MATERIALS S396.67 CONCRETE OFFICE 108314 90YLE ENGINEERING CORP 182.377.40 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-14,14-1-162 108375 BREA PRINTING S1.347.25 PRINTING �TiZ7BQ— �NSTROCT - -_ 108377 BROWN i CA LOVELL SI.595.08 LAB SERVICES 108378 BROWN i CALDWELL CONSULTING $134.798.73 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19 lu"31v SYCVE SUBALO ! CO, $176TUM.TF—CON—STRUCTION - - 1UB380 F.R. BURKE INDUSTRIAL CORP. $76.813.26 CONSTRUCTION J-24 198381 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES. INC. SI3.590.00 SURVEYING SERVICES US 88-71 —.._--_—3"673:16--- ETTY-cm-uIPmuRS I06383 BY-PRODUCTS MANAGEMENT. INC. $349.95 FERROUS CHLORIDE M.0.4-12-89 108384 CS COMPANY $5.163.76 VALVES 108385 1991 CWpCAR N .W GISTRATION IDA386 CAL-CHEM SALES 6241.93 HARDWARE 108387 CALTROL . INC. $21,100.00 REGULATOR PARTS Illeass CAL TT�E OFFICE - NEWITFIFIRINT9MCF— I08399 CARLETON ENGINEERS $7.611.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES M.0.5-9-90 - C ( ( . FUND NO 919S - JT DIST WORKING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE .7126190 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNT? CLAIMSA 0 WARRANT NO. VENDOR 440UNT DESCRIPTION IOB390 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS f503.469.95 ENGINEERING SERUMS 1-9.P1-20.P1-34 108392 CENTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM 91.666.48 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATION 109392 CHALLENGE BEARING D• L i3 UAROWARE I OB393 CNEypopN-U•S•4•• INC• izz♦665,96 UNLEADED GASOLINE 8394 DALE CXRIS IAN C. E G 31. 10.00 eNCINEERIMC SERVICES ]-7-4 GP 95 Xq K C A KSNA 1• II f .0 MACHINE "PAIR 106396 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT 51.301.2U MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 0 100397 COAST INSURANCE AGENCY i38.5B6.00 INSURANCE -�1-D390 C 6' __----f 8. R•T2 -- CUHGTR CI - - 6 108399 C.I•C.S• • CO. . INC. $2,216.34 MACHINE REPAIRS 108400 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF $5,507.13 MECHANICAL PARTS _ 1084P1 COMPUTER WORLD 3 .99 SUBSCRIPTION , ) + IOA402 COMPUSERVE $9.37 COMPUTER SERVICES IOP403 CONAPP.S PHOTOGRAPHY $672.31 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 10 .- i3 u. TR—fiCc�FA—RT . 1 OB903 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. $6,149.03 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES X H. 108406 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTYAYS 967.74 mien - I OB401 33. CHLORINE M.O. 2 + 30P 40P CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS 94.026.35 BLUEPRINTING M.G.1-10-90 1084C9 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS VEST i115.00 CONSULTING - GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES 10 410 EL SOPPLIE -3 108412 CRANE VEYOR CORP. 9399.90 PIPE 100412 CREDIT MARKETS s525.00 PUBLICATION CA a LARKT PTI TRUCK EQUIPMENT 2 . 9 . SLUDGE REYOV M.O. - - + 1014 CY 8 ERE 52.25G.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT IV M, 1O1115 STATE OF CALIFORNIA f117.54 DIESEL USE TAR �El�i 2'f 1-S�MCGAxlC PAR 8 100417 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE $993.14 TIRES 1U841R DE ARIA CORPORATION s150.00 STORAGE 108419 DEIUR.IK AND/0 CS CP. 39 .P VALVE ...n 108420 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $3.034.04 PRINTING +4 108421 DOLLINGER CORP. 61.978.27 _ MECHANICAL PARTS EDORADO ENTERPRISES. INC. — PLANTlPxIMWARM A REPAIRS -- 108423 DUNKEL 0009. MACH MOVING $1.452.10 SPACE eUR'E•AL 3-19A n•I 10p424 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. i1r792.62 PAINT SUPPLIES A g'F$ [ ST AA. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 108426 Y. H. C9EPT CORP• $125,039.00 CONSTRUCTION 5-35-1 100427 ECOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING 6 ATIALY 36.325.00 OCEAN MONITORING F.—' .42EFFECTIVE—"ML1W"rlIl— ---- ---ifi JL2S---'- PRE98MTAiION D .6% 108429 ELECTRONIC BALANCING CO. 3390.00 IMPRLLER REPAIR n� 108430 ENCHANTER. INC. _ i4•500.0U _ OCP.1N MONITORING M.0.3-14-90 IUP431 ERNST, COYLE 6 LA CH OL•1[7 f5.1IM.0Y LEM SERVICES - OXFORD PROPERTY 140432 MARSHALL FAIRRES $178.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 1CA433 FARR SALCS R SEHVICE $252.92 FILTERS *�1 4 e4 o L Why— ---- so39.Ga'-- - - AIa PREIGBS 6Lt 108435 FERPELLGAS $34.g3 PROPANE Y4 j et FUND ND 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CALITAL PROCESSING DATE 7126/96 PACE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CCUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID TL77775r -PTT9MG-TTM • WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION • 1011436 FISCHER L PORTER CO. $3.315.59 MECHANICAL PARTS . 100437 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $1.195.31 LAB SUPPLIES CONCRETE CRETINS 109439 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $21.78 FILM 108440 FOUNTAIN VALLEY TRANSIT MIN $321.94 CONCRE3E INSTRUMENT PART 106442 FOXBORO CO. / HAS SYSTEMS $1.509.31 INSTRUMENT 100443 FOABORO/JOROAN. INC $1.198.33 INSTRUMENT PARS .-- CIA"2—' --.rRacR P 108445 A•F. FRET $105•00 DEFERRED CURE DISTRIBUTION 108446 FRICTION INCORPORATED $668.03 REFUND USER FEE OVER PAYlENT GANAHL LUMBER CO. $059.0p BUILDING MATERIALS 10844E GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,910.96 TELEPHONE 109449 GIERLICH-MITCHELL, INC. SA.963.20 PUMP PARTS e4so TEL: 3'E59=oa'—'--- RAPETr Es 108451 GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION S3.000.00 STREET SWEEPING 108452 DON GREEK S ASSOCIATES S690.00 SURVEYING SERVICES RES 88-72 m A. • MECHANICAL PARTS X 108454 FA EO A. HpR PER $1.495.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION • 106455 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PL AETICS $667.43 GAUGE b0 • 1 $57.21 ENCINB PARTS H7 109457 S. A. HEALY CO. $182.044.19 CONSTRUCTION PI-35-1 108458 DONALD D• NONOMICHL . $300.00 DEFERRED CONT DISTRIBUTION },b1UP45, "UU5L Ur VAPILKiLb $1.697.21 BATTERIES ' 1 108460 R.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. $1.394.13 SAFETY SUPPLIES W 108461 HUNTINGTON BEACH RU2BEP. STAMP $3.72 RUBBER STAMP • 111 ENCLNEMVG SERVICES 108963 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $137.581.66 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.II-08-89 108464 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS 91.950.05 CONNECTORS JANITORIAL SUPPLIES JOG 466 14 VI NE R4 NCH WATER. DISTRICT 11D3.45 WATER USEACE 108467 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $596.52 _ INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES TS.0 ELECTRIC PARTS 10B469 KALLEEN•S COMPUTER SUPPLIES S870.21 PAINT SUPPLIES 108470 KAMAN BEARINGS L SUPPLY $533.59 FITTINGS T 9L"KUI EFL: ♦ar.1u-CONSTRUCTION 5-3 - 10F472 KEN•S OIL. INC. 1102.51 WASTE OIL DISPOSAL fi 108473 KING BEARING. INC, S4.177.71 MACHINE SUPPLIES lEOT --16i O':a➢ --..__� ..euBCMslxc CONSULTANT I084T5 MARTIN KORDICK. SR 62.BD4.40 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 14-1-13 108476 'LEEDS L NORTHRUP $930.69 INSTRUMENT ASSOC. . .SS ENGINEERING SERVICES - GEOTEMICAL INSPECTION In 1OP478 LEWCC ELECIR IC CO. $97•IC RADIO • 10N479 K.I. LINDSTROM, INC. 02.261.58 MASTER PLAN SERVICES M.O.10-14-90 HAS --- ---— -------—i290.D6-...- - PNOTOGRAPBIC SERVICES 108401 MALCOLM PIRATE . INC. S6•104.57 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.O.7-12-89 FUND NO ?199 - JT UIST VORVING CAPI7AL PROCESSING DATE 7/26/9D PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY C A MS FTi 1T1 4STLJVO POSn NG DATE 0010E WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 108482 MARVAC ELECTRONICS %189.64 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES IDE483 HATT - CHLOR. INC. ___ $099.08 _ CBLORINATION PARTS 84 ON N OR R 44.050.00 CONSULTING - OCEAS STUDY 108085 MAXWELL COLORS $18.38 PHOTO ➢EVELOPING 1088486 MCMA STER-CARR SUPPLY CO. S426.65 TOOLS 108487 PAT ICM MC MELL $18.87 MILEAGE EEPENSE - IOR4B8 MES COMPANY $13,740.51 MECHANICAL REPAIRS ID0489 MICRO MOTION $379.17 _ METER REPAIR loa490 —i' COMPUTER HARDWARE SOFTYAM -- 108492 M/LLTPONICS S2.258.05 INSTRUI4NT 108492 MOORE 5 TABER t21.350.00 EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIRS DIST 7 80 g3 MOTION INDUSTRIES, INC. 1729.63 MECHANICAL PARTS 200494 MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICES $102.29 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 108495 MULTIVIRE DIVISION $576.39 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYlBNT I"39b NRT 0 NT S E5�I17—C. -- -CSBL.Sa-- -— PACNIM TRUCK SERVICES -- 108497 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $121.13 LOBE OIL m - 108498 GUST K. NEWBERG COMET. CO. 51.923.647.20 CONSTRUCTION PI-33 — Y4RN ELE[ RD ITI[S $124.27 INSTRUMENT PART I08500 CITY DF NEVPORT BEACH 57.88 WATER DSEAG¢ FF 10850E N00.1H SUPPLY $117.56 _ TELEPHONE PART k, 100502 OCCUPATIONALTSP.17-- SAPEIY CLASSES 108503 OR SYSTEMS CO. S28.503.83 CHLORINE M.O.2-14-90 ® 200504 ORANGE BEARING. INC. 5100.16 MECHANICAL PARTS peg-1T�575 OXYGEN SERVICE S5 '9.68 SPECIALTY GASES r IOP.506 CSDOC SELF-FUNDED MEDICAL INS $154,000.00 PREMIUM ADVANCE 108507 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 62.196.01 REIMBURSE WORREIIS COMP INSURANCE PUMP PARTS 108509 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $331.29 SAFETY SUPPLIES - 108510 PACIFIC BELL $654.63 TELEPHONE 0 L L C ULAR t .6 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE _ IOP512 PAN VEST $734.40 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 100513 PARTS UNLIMITED 51.750.3E VEHICLE PARTS Y12$ - S4.009.61 CYLINDER REPAIR b^ 108515 PEAT. MARWICK, MAIN A CO. $5.000.00 AUDITING SERVICES N.0.3-9-88 108516 ROY FENOERSRAFT $445.00 DEFEBR® COMP DISIRIEUTION 08511 PIMA GAO SYSTEMS. INC. 544.970.4E SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-I1-88 108518 PIINEY HOWES S1T2.13 POSTAGE HEM RENTAL .:I 108519 POLYPUPE. INC, $38.464.49 POLYMERS M.0.1-10-90,8-9-89 _ 108521 FOYER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. SIE8.?$ ELECERIC SUPPLIES ke 108522 POWER SYSTEMS 3163.1E ENGINE PARTS 10P523 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE S312.00 ICE M%{ 1OP524 THE FRGJECTS SOLUTION CO. 52.540.0E INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.8-10-88 P, 108525 PEP WING SHOES 5157.21 SAFETY SHOES 18 0 2E 5 R.E.D.I. . ._ ._ .-..__. - _ 3938.3 FJ___._. __ — INDEE65 --_ 208527 REDI CYPRESS $40.00 DELIVERY CHARGES �I FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WOPPING CAPITOL PROCESSING DATE 7/26/90 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER. AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OPANGE COUNTY CLAIMS :6/➢179G—PIIfTIDe�R17E—D8 -- WARRANT 90. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 108528 P.A. REED ELECTRIC S5.145.32 PUMPS 108529 REMEDY TEMP $2.637.83 TEMPORARY SERVICES 108531 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. S2.135.15 GAUGE 108532 J. R. ROBERTS CORP. 5104.747.52 CONSTRUCTION J-7-4 _ $219.486-.Ug CONSTRUCTION J- 7 109534 J. P. ROBERTS S158.367.04 CONSTRUCTION J-20 106535 ROSEMOUNT/UNILOC $1.662.95 INSTRUMENT PART —I ORP "__---�5.T.4➢'—�AR'iS CI:EANSB _—_-_ 108537 SANCON ENGINEERING A INC. $184.410.00 CONSTRUCTION 3-33R 106538 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $463.76 ELECTRIC MOTOR r1..Ti S" ENGINEERING SERVICES DISI S b7 _ 108540 SCHULER ENGINEERING CORP. $227.539.76 CONSTRUCTION PI-27-162 108541 SEA COAST DESIGNS $138.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES ..uz4z SEARS. ROEBUCK A CO. 108543 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1,373.55 TOOL 108544 SLIDE MASTER $114.75 PRESENTATION AIDS 108545 • ..IT- SOIL TESTING M.O. -14-89 m 109546 SOFT WAREHOUSE $146.14 COMPUTER SOFTWARE X 108547 SOLAR TURBINES INC. $2.334.31 TURBINE REPAIR 2 8 OPERATING TIES TSl 108549 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY 31.572.00 SOURCE MST 108550 SOUTH COAST WATER S281.50 EOUIPNPAT RENTAL IDH557SDO1TE N C"ALIF.E015ON 71-5 POWER CO 208552 SO. CAL. GAS CO. $262.67 NATURAL GAS 108553 $0. CALIF. WATER CO. 1102.50 WATER USEAGE �LI.I93. DIESEL FUEL 108555 SPACESAVER SYSTEMS. INC.• f6.490.52 FILING SYSTEM FARMS 108556 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $1,182.01 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS • F.E. 94'J91.ca ENGINEERING SERVICES J-20,P1-34-1 108558 WESTALLOY INC. $39.12 WELDING SUPPLIES 108559 STAR TOOL A SUPPLY CO. 81.157.26 TOOLS 108560 SUMMIT STEEL STEEL 108561 SUN-BELT LANDSCAPE R MAINT. $3.847.00 CONTRACT GR00NDSKRUING M.O.8-9-69 109562 SUNSET FORD S112.67 Mum PARTS L7 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 108561 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL. INC. S3.323.60 TOOLS 108565 SWEETLAND CO. 1377.55 FITTINGS .--r➢BS •"TDr.--__._.___.57337➢i ELBCiRIC602PLI _ __ 108567 TCH ASSOCIATES $752.38 1,1u8 SUPPLIES 108568 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD $5.057.52 VAR LBASES —III PUBLICATION 108570 TONY•S LOCK A SAFE SERVICE S72.19 KITS 108571 TRAVEL TRAVEL $656.60 TRAVEL SERVICES INC, T1Y3:7S — TRUCE Pun 108573 J.G. TUCKER 6 SON. INC. $2.L42.91 INSTRUMENT PARTS FUND rv0 9199 - Ji DI ST YOPKINF CAP ITAL PROCESSING GATE 1/26/90 PAGE E REPORTEPORT NUM NUMB[R AP 43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY cte tM5 lrllE-6675L79r—FH9TTWG—oR TE BM 9 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 300574 TWINING LABORATORIES Of $5,204.25 BOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89 IoRS]5 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 879.60 PARCEL SBRVIC86 108576 UNITED PUMPING SERVICE 024.50 VACUUM TRUCK BeHVICE 108577 VMS (VISUAL HGMT. SYSTEMS) $1.003.12 I1157RU!MENE MAJOR • 108578 VWR SCIENTIFIC $3.115.98 LAB SUPPLIES FIG O • MECHANICAL PARTS I08580 VALLEY CITIES SUPFLY CO. 86.057.23 FITTINGS 108591 CARL WARREN 8 CO- 6874.61 INSURANCE DIATOMS ADMINISTRATOR luebez 9rWTEFff-2YX7r-CFfrmICALY • .90— -- - - CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-9-89 108563 WOODRIDGE PRESS 820.953.56 BROCHURE 1OB584 ROURKE R WOODRUFF 644.559.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.6-14-89 _ XEROX CORP. 6 • 6. COPIER LEASES 1�+ 108586 GEORGE YARDLEY COMPANY 8111.96 VALVE IOP.5E7 21EBAR7N AND ALPER "1'.549.05 CONSTRUCTION P2-37 _ 5E8 Do— DEFERRED COMP DISTBIBOYlOA TOTAL.m MS FAI 5F ----_---r992_ X _ lA R�1lEfAR — _ 1� 01 OPER FUND / 34.77 _ 1 ER FUND 84.33s m 02 OAP PAC FUND 16,850.54 /3 OPER FUND 216,850.54 .5� /5 CAP FAC FOND 600,856.19 /6 OPBR PUNT 98.00 06 CAP FAC FUND 732.36 _ 07 OPER FUND 24.207.14 07 CAP FAC FUND 173,209.64 III OPIR FUND 37:06- 114 OPER FORD 966.00 114 CAP PAC FUND 126.876.12 0566 OPER TOND 3.970-3 1667 OPER FUND 3,589.59 6: 97614 OPER FOND 5.382.92 �.' JT-OPER p — — -r,070;523:05-_.--- - G; DORF 7,678,772.93 SFI/WURKERS COMP INSURANCE FUNDS 196.040.66 JT WORKING CAPITAL FOND �33.Ii5.78-- T 10,546,992.16 Y) �4, FUND NO 9109 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0109/90 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 ________LDIALY SABIIA7.1.4N_D15TBICTS QF_QRANGE_COUNIh— CLAIMS PAID 06/15/99 POSTING DATE 08/15/90 WARRANT NO, ___VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 108614 HAG SYSTEMS 9379.44 INSTRUMENT PART 14e A1� ASP. ANPL.T.F.15 sP94..45 PUMP NJGRAx10N_ANAL7sIB _— _ 106616 AT A 7 $468.35 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICE _ 108617 ACCU - SLU06C f499.11 LAB SUPPLIES 121610 _.LIN40LN..CAN2ESiA-111TERIORs s3c0NA4._—__-- TLLe1EeelRs _ I04,619 AIR ACCESSORIES CO. t293.06 COMPRESSOR PARTS 108620 ALPHAGAZ 51.019.8E INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 65H7402. _ 108622 AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY $541.97 CAMERAS _ 108623 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $3.786.58 ROAD REPAIRS DIST 7 _ 100,624 SLAKE P. ANDERSON 1765.1p MEMO MENSE _ I01,625 ANIRTER - WIRE t CABLE $149.30 CABLE _ 10b626 AN7HONY'S MECH. t MACHINE. INC $322.00 MECHANICAL PARTS . ...106627..—.._. P-PL OS. ST STEBB_ _.__..—.._ $2,49T.71 108620 APPLE ONE $090.96 TEMPORARY SERVICES 108629 ARATEN SERVICES. INC. $8.925.49 UNIFORM RENTALS FMl " IIB63.0 .ARIZONAINSLmEB7 14.975,20—_ --------- I11MUBENE-REPAIR X _ 108631 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CO. - $266.95 TRUCK PARTS _ 108632 R R T HYDRAULICS $1.127.03 PUMP PARTS Do" 1DB633 _ FALCON_DISPOSAL_SERVICE. _ 1179.430SB8._.. . _ _GRIT_R¢M4VAL.U.Ot7_I3-B0__—__ 108634 P.Y. RAROTTI AND ASSOC. $6.562.50 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PI-34-2.P2-37 —I ' 108635 BANTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS 62.051.36 LAB SUPPLIES f"1 11163f BAIL ES,LSIAl1BNEfls— lJLAm.9fi .. OFFICE SUPPLIES _ IOB637 RO BERT BEIN.YILLIAN FPO ST L AS S22.383.35 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-33.3-34 f+ 1. 638 BOL TRON IN DATA MA IN7EN AMC SI90.S0 COMPUTER DISK MAINTENANCE .: --14463p—_..__.. ..EOM-A.BVES_..__.___.___._ f71•S6.__ _. ._.TROGR__PAR'CL..__- 208640 BRENNER-FIEDLEP R ASSOC., INC. $745.73 COMPRESSOR PARTS - 108641 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. $1.157.24 CHLORINE METER I AB"2 BROWN_A_CALOWELL to•713,.8➢.—___— LAE SERYICes 108643 BUREAU OF BUSINESS FP/[TILE 11.416.90 PUBLICATION 108644 GRAY G. STREED 31.769.50 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT _108645... _.__.CS COMPANY .—.. ....__— ..__._ S222.16 ... ., .. _._._ _ VALVE__ 186646 CAL-FAC CHEMICAL CO.. INC. $186.90 CHEMICALS . I111,607 CALTROL . INC. $1.024.97 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 148648___— .AMER.ICOPL.SISKA —. t3.623.34.. ....... . LAB_SUPPLIER 108649 CHRISTINE T. CARR 3726.OP COMPUTER INPUT SERVICES 108650 CHARLES Y. CARTER CO. S657.19 HYDRAULIC CYLINDER .. 1173 10665L _ . .. CENTURY PAINT __— .0E . ..__ . PAINT SUPPLIES__ ____... ._ .._.__. I06652 CENTURY SAFETY INST.INC. A BUFF. $628.06 SAFETY U) SUPPLIES ._ 10fl 653 CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC. t3.092.95 REFUND GASOLINE CHEVRON_U.Sd4A_T, INC. _._ 12A2P0.91___._.. ....._.-_._.-_ REPHNO.USER FEE DVERPAYHENT 106656 CHROME CRANKSHAFT. INC. 1$89.50 MECHANICAL PART 106E56 CHURCH AUTOMATIC. TRANSMISSION_ INC. 3tl9.50 ENGINEERING TS SERVICES 7-13 10865T. . .. . 'COAST AUTON ATIC. TRANSRISSIDN—. _.. 1.160.25 _ . _ __ - TRUER YARNS 100659 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT t1$451.56 PIE¢ELECTRIC PARTSHERS 100659 COILS UNLIMITED f451.56 8L8CTRIC PARTS FUND NO 9119 - JT GIST VORHINP CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8108/90 PAGE 2 - REPORT NUMBER AP43 ..___-__.10U2L1 SAS.ISAL10N1115Tnu•TR OF OR ANSE_CRUNTIL--.- CLAIMS PAID 06/15/90 POSTING DATE 00/15/90 Y\RPIYi NA- _ ,{EDpeR AMOUNT _._.__..._ Bl3LAIBY ION • I08660 COLICM AND SONS f80.203.35 CONB'EROCTION 2-11-1 866L__-_COMPUTER AOa_A_INC• st 16➢. ri._ . .-.___.___REUDILAL_R ___1 866 COMPUTER AUTOMATION 9163.9 BRFWNU USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 30 8663 CONARDSS PHOT06RAPHY $904.19 BROCHUIIE AA'11i0RR I➢➢561 _COMNELLGaM.3ARTS / etv f3O.O6____.----TBDCE.3ABTS- 106665 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. 911.592.91 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 108666 CONSUL IDATEO FREIGMTYAYS S99.36 FREIGHT __.10S667--CONTAINERIZED. CHEMICAL M=KASTE DISPOSAL__.. ..__ IA8669 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO S2.290.75 CHLORINE M.0.10-11-89 168669 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS $9.991.15 BLUEPRINTING 'I . enx eiNF .11e.,6➢__- ,_----MNmR 16i I0B171 COSTA MCSA AUTO SUPPLY 3231.01 TRUCE PARTS • ) loe672 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $1.396.32 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES SMARTS____. CHMILALPR➢CESSORS..111C- -----------------------------eI.212...01...__. __._ _._ _ . . .JAIN7(elA1-3fPPLIES.__._. 100674 CAL STATE UNIV. FULLERTON $495.00 REGISTRATION _ 108675 DANIEL9 TIRE SERVICE 1870.19 TIRES m I.RAT6 _DECO 261e.AE __..-SLECERIC.SOLTLIE9__ .1C 108677 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $42.50 BUSINESS CARDS _ 108676 DONALD CALLENDAR FAMILY TRUST SB3.31 RAIVNo USER ESE OVERPAYMENT 108680__. OUNN_CN.A IN310RP_._- aa.Bae.9e _._ ._ PAINT_SSUPPLIE_._ 10B6B0 EASTNANO INC. f1$327.52 OEFICL SUPPLIES �•I" 108681 ECDANALY3IS. INC. f627.52 OCEAN IIDNETDRING f") arj .n6 ya rniir aTtnuei nrvn OBtlf xi tart, un.aen,&,__ CONTBIBU7IION -_Y0117H.EDIIGTIOLPBOORAN ac REGISTRATION 1 106B6 EGGHEAD UNIVERSITY f199.OG OCEAN MONITORING M.OJ-Ib-90 N - IO66P1 ENCHANTER. INC. fB00.00 _infis, -_.-.�OHN_B._FALKENSTEZV0.L._ tx_cnn.bp,_„_.. . _ _. __-CONEIHOCIIONSERVICC6l-7cb. Je20.J-12__. Y 108686 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. 962.25 AIR FREIGHT 'I 108697 FERRELLBAS $11.48 PROPANE US IAAABa CMEursx, INC- ae•nna.00--_ SUPPLIES_- 10N689 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $137.30 CHLORINATION PARTS 108690 FISCHCR 6 PORTER CO. $7.065.23 CHLORIMATION PARTS 108691-....... FISHER SCIENTIEIC_CO._._._ -_._.__._--S129.25__ _.__. LAB SUPPLIES_ .__.. 108692 FLAT B VERTICAL CONCRETE $135.95 CONCRETE CUTTING 108693 FLUID TECH $416.46 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES I DH694 __ELUORMUCS._1Yr_ _ aB.I.22_. _ .-_._._ ._-_[ffiCRANILALSUPPISES_- 108695 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $247.35 FILM 108696 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY 69.136.19 WATER USPAGE -__..108697 ._._. FOF. ENTERPRISES._ 51.025.00. . _ SAFEM CONSULTANT'_ _..... 108698 THE FOXBOROFUL ERTONCOMPANY f9R.30 CHARTS - IO8f 99 CITY OF FVLLERTON f113.30 WATER OSRAGB 108701 .__..GENERAL TELEPHONE _ f$73.78._...._. .-.._.._ _..TELEPHONE BERM. 106702 GEORGE TELEPHONE CO. f73.61 TELEPHONE SUPPLIES 108703 HARBOUR LEECH S ASSOCIATES t1.296.65 ELECTRIC SDPPLPL9 _.108704 -. . _ HARBOUR KIRK. INC.NE TOOT _. . ._______115.$449.61 .. ENGINEIPAR SUPPLIES 108705 HATCH f NIRN. IC $698.73 ENGINE PARTS _ 108705 M{LTI. INC. � 3690.7J HARDWARE FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST VORAING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATC 6100190 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP63 CLAIMS 0D/25/90$ILOSTING DATE 081 CLAINS PAID OP/IS/99 POSTING DATE OBI75/90 1'I WARRANT NO, VENDOR AMOUNT USSCR IPTON ! 10P706 HOERNIGER C.V.S. CALIF. . INC. 5457.28 MECHANICAL PARTS ° Hum-__H.QUE_Of_1BLTGBJES— —31��IJ.2A—_. 100708 R.S. HUGHES CO.. INC.. S1.614.49 PAINT SUPPLIES • '� 100709 IND INDUSTRIES 13.129.00 ELEMIC SUPPLIES 1CS721 ISCDJ_1 fit- f61:9g_.-_.._._.___---LAD. SIMIES _ 108711 I.S.I. VEST S1.194.96 INSTRUMENT 106712 IMPERIAL VEST CHEMICAL 156.965.09 FERRIC/FERROUS CHLORIDE M.O.I1-06-89 ;___J0B>1! 1NOUS1 R 16L.T HA U_D.EO_.I!R 0011CYX- 91100.15 _. ._.._. _. _- CONNECTORS.__..__.._._____._ 108716 INGRAM PAPER $2.146.01 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 100715 1RVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $129.52 WATER USBAGE __MOB T16 JAxU3. INC -111,12_____.— !^^ SOPPLIES 10871T JAY-S CATERING $154.75 MEETING MUSE i" 106718 JOETS WATCR TRUCKS $576.0v WATER TRUCK RENTAL DIST 5 __.__..1.6471L__JONNSTONC..SUPPLI _ }3g Q2_.__ ELECIRIC..BU2PLIES_..______, LOOTED THE KEITH COMPANIES S1.236.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-3565-36 108721 KING BEARING. INC. 1662.18 MACHINE SUPPLIES m P' IBA". M,r. M CBS 1511.50_ TEMPOMRY SERVICES 3K _ 106723 MARTIN KORDICK. SP S2.322.20 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 5-35-1 108724 LAN SUPPORT GROUP S159.00 BINDING SERVICES '-� 10BT25 ._..__LASER SUP P.LIES_-6_SELYICL $769.68___ _ .. ____.PRINLSVPPLIES___�_ _ ' 108726 LAUNDERLAND 557.1E REFUND USER TES OVBMAYBMMI' r._• 108727 LIESERT CORPORATION S129.63 ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT O. IDATPR x.P. LINDSTROM. INC. $2,349,50_ MABTER_PLAN_EIR - CONRDUI1NQ_ fl �• 100729 LORAIN PRODUCTS 51.256.29 RELIANCE POWER MAINTENANCE 108730 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 92 $131,376.00 POOLED EMISSONS ESTIMATING PROGRAM W _SOB7S7 __..MAC APPL LED_ENY1RONJIIEN.T91.. sz),2BIBR.. — TAB SERVICES_—._._ 108732 MOT BIOLOGIC COMPANY $393.57 LAB SUPPLIES 100733 HAS $132.18 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES IAATIA MACBMCO AE65AAj—.._ SFBPICE_AOvenrvul' . �- 106735 MARINE A VALVE SUPPLY $166.93 VALVE 106736 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $60.53 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES :.___108I37__._____. NCBAIR INSTRUMENTS_ A33A.00- .___. __ - — LAB_MAINEENASCE__.._—__—_. 206736 NCNASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. $676.99 SAFETY SUPPLIES 108739 MEASUPERENT CONTROL SYS. INC. $1.996.93 BEARINGS ^glAe' .HrOLIN1BNK(U.".0._ AITB.IS_ - _PLUMBING..SMYLIES 1OFT61 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO. 561136.111 SAFE" SUPPLIES I00742 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL. INC. $167.811 PUBLICATION ._._ .MONITOR PUBLISHING IDR766 MONTGOPERY LABORATORIES $1.601.25 LAB SERVICES 108745 . MOTOROLA. INC. t358.06 RADIO PAGER _&OBISe )IATIONAL-GOVEBNORM-ASSOL. _ A1SL0.0., PUBLICATION_____ 10R767 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES. INC. t1.722.50 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 308768 NORTH SUPPLY 955.2E TELEPHONE BELL _.. _..108799..—_._ OCCUPATIONAL VISION_SERVICCS_ ...___--S232.66 ...._ ._.. -.. .... ..MEET CLASSES-_.- 106750 OR SYSTEI13 CO. $52,257.91 CHLORINE M.0.2-16-90 100751 CYNTHIA O.NEIL $50.66 MILEAGE MUSS FUND NO 91QQ _ JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/08/9C PAGE A REPORT NUMBER AP43 _..____ _.._. _ .__..__—.—L➢➢t1IY—SLN17ait➢IL.O I.T OF_ORANGE.COUNTY L CLAIMS PAID OR115/90 POSTING DATE 08/15/90 1 +' ARRANI NO, ___...VENDDB__ eMOuxT _._.___ n[scflI CIIDTL_ _ +_. IORT52 OPERATION TECHNOLOGY INC. $1.062.50 SERVICE AGREEMENT °j I.GEI33_._. ORANGE.BEABIUD._IML. sa.NT.,3.L...__._—_.._ .. MECHANICAL_PART IO0759 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $900.75 TRUCK PARTS 108755 ORANGE COUNTY INDUSTRIAL $2,976.56 FIBERGLASS r 102156___._ORAN GE_VALV.E_LEI R7.R15.DD.___ FIMHGA_—_ 100757 OXYGEN SERVICE $1,100.97 SPECIALTY CASES 100756 COUNTY OF ORANGE $302.40 MAPPING SERVICES • _.___..108754.__ ... . ORANGE COUNT.7_MARSHALL.__.__ __._.__1829.3b... __. ..._ .___.P/R DED_-CBA9E2__...— .._-. 108760 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $6,146.06 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP IN80MMCA 108761 PR VEST ENTERPRISES $66.15 LAMMINATION SHEETS 1097.1 P.r1..r Pee re 13A3AS..AO_.___— IBHTHV!@NLPABis IOS763 FACIFIC SAFETY EOUIPMLNT CO. $2,766.23 SAFETY SUPPLIES • 1O0760 PACIFIC SEVER MAINTENANCE CORP 89.321.00 SEWER ROOT CONTROL TREATMENT DIST 7 • ___-108I65..... ..... .. .PACIFIC.9ELL ..._.__..._—____— •16.23._... _____--_. TELEPHONE__ __.___. 105766 PACIFIC BELL $21,155.22 REPAIR PAC. BELL EQUIPMENT 100767 PARTS ENGINEERING COMPANY $252.39 COMPRESSOR PARTS n Iep7.A _PJAr_UMLI81Trn sf99_bL._____ ._—.TRUCC3AR7p 2X.. 108769 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS. INC. $45.201.55 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88 ' 100770 PLAINS 7RUEVALUE HARDWARE 567.39 HARDWARE �"�•' 10AE71.___. . POLYPURE ..I_INC. �;: 108772 PORTER BOILER SERVICE. INC. $776.O9 ELECTRIC PART IOB773 POWER TRACK. INC. $70.35 ROSE 1 na))• P PPMI111LE11NNrritNa POINT l.RP.AA OPFICE_EQOIPHRxV Rp)slve C-)u 108775 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE A1R9.D0 ICE 1 x 10A776 PROFESSIONAL PUBLICATIONS. INC $73.53 PUBLICATION r6 1Rfl72i--__.__THE_PROJECTS.SOLLLII➢ILCO.__._ ----SAi1.52.DG.. ._ ._..-___._. INRTRUIOffITATI02.]NSPECTION1f.p.B-30-8fl._--. 10877E PULSAFEEDEP S46.71 METER -- 106779 ONE. INC. $13.000.84 COMPUTER SUPPLIES/PRIMER ➢fl7RA A,UALSI]LREER1GE8671Dx ... 13 _ _1Wv)ornmrrr vDovr 7ae 108781 RADIOLOGICAL TRAINING SERVICES $150.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT •�' 100782 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $1.050.61 TRAIN BIN REMOVAL L.__.1O8783 R.0_.STSTEMS..INC.. __.___. 2169.6'd.._. ..._.......__ ..PRINTEH.REPAIA__..—._. ._..._. .__.____--... 308789 RECVC. INC. $67,640.00 SLUDGE REMOVAL H.0.2-10-88 108785 REDI EXPRESS $39.00 LAS SUPPLIES ^ 1RA7Ac- ._IIIE_REG.LSIEn .__ PpSM.55_ _H0TICE9_6 An 108787 REMEDY TEMP $619.20 TEMPORARY SERVICES 10878E THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. $294.99 CONNECTORS _ _._.108789. .. ._ ._ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL__ _.._. _ ______.— $555.38 _ - INSTRUMENT . . 106790 ROSEMOUNT/UNILOC $357.02 FITTINGS • 108791 JOSEPH T. RYERSON A SON. INC. 3466.13 STEEL _.—_l08392—_.._._._$KC.WES I. .._____.__..__.._.___ __BASS•N1. ..._. .. . ._. .. .. HARDWARE—_..__.__.--_—___ 13R793 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $326.61 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS • .. 108794 SANDS-POC $375.30 REGISTRATION _..__ 128725_..__ .. DOUG GARVIS _... . . _ _. ..__..._._ .___3350.00 ... .__. . REGISTRATION_._..._.__ .__.—__. _ ...._. _... 108796 REGISTRATION- SCIENCE APPLICATIONS ICA]IONS TNT•L 942.253.27 OCEAR MONITORING M.0.6-13-90 I00797 SCOTT SPECIALTY BASES. IMC $517.94 SPECIALTY GASES J: FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITOL PPOCESSING DATE 8109/90 PAGE 5 REPORT NUNBE4 AP43 .-___-CDIMi.LE..S6R1IAI145_IRIRICT3 OF ORANGE COUNTY-_,..__,_. CLAIMS PAID 08/15/90 POSTING DATE 08/15/90 ,T. ' WARRANT N0. �EBDOR AMOUNT IOB798 SEA-910D ELECTRONICS. INC. 6980.00 LAB SUPPLIES 19.fl.242—_ ___4E4 CQA3LOt51.IN3 P462�LB_.......... .._.__..._.DPFICE_FORNITOE_._.-- r` losses CITY OF SEAL BEACH 9210.50 VATKR USEAGR 10seol $ETON NAME PLATE CORP. SO11.66 TARS � 101802 _SNAM.ROCK_flVPP.Lr a4e7..yi__ ._._. _..._— TQOEE_-- 10R803 SHEPHERD PACMINERY CO. $629.76 TRUCK PARTS 108804 SMITH-EMERY CO. 91.120.50 SOIL TESTING H.0.6-14-89 SOFI_YKRFNQUSE - _.._____._— 19a.3S_.... .. _ . __ . CEEUTER..SQFTVABE._. _ 108806 SOLAR TURBINES INC. $313.92 FREICB'I _ loose? SO. COAST AIR QUALITY. $5.593.00 PERMIT FEES _ 108808 Spy]_y_J,DASI-MAIFR s97.Op__—__. RENTAI-EQUEPNCNI_ 100809 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISDN CO. 517.943.6? POWER 106e1O 30. CAL. OAS CO. ' 13.336.40 NATGML GM _ IQAgll_, SOUTHERN .CALIFA_.QAS..COL_ f20.2,1j.§5,,, ,, _,___,.__, ._ ,. GASOLINE.MPWCEKENr__,___- . 108822 SOUTHERN COUNTIES DAL CO. $11,192.68 DIESEL FUd 1OGel3 STAMEN Z. SPASSOFF. P.C. 54.000.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-14-10-19-10 13 ITT a. .ORRI• WLSIALLDILIN9 a5e9.Rp ,_____tOIW[NC_SOPPLIEs X _ 108015 STAR TOOL 6 SUPPLY CO. $975.63 TOOLS JUPR16 SUNMIT STEEL 93.546.90 STEEL SUNSET-FO.RD_._ ._—..- - f70.le..... ... . ._._._..TRUCK.PARER-..._._ � • 108816 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL, INC. 36.033.35 TOOLS .y 108919 SWEETLAND CO. $762.84 FITTINGS ~a, 1DeREe *6YLOfltDVl7IL a]4e.BA TAUCK_PARTS n E 108821 TMA/NNOCAL $220.90 LAB SERVICRS 1 ar 108622 TOTAL TECHNICAL SERVICES i714.50 CONTMCI' SERVICES PI-34-2 IOAB23_--..IRAFFIC_CQNTROL.SEAVICL• INK. S33.a31 .—TRUCK PARTS—.— °i 108024 TRAVEL TRAVEL $1,978.00 TRAVEL SERVICES '! 108825 H.O. TREMICE CO. 5698.66 INSTRUENT SUPPLIES :> feRR2c �AIILRJ_SUID3UPPLY4IR RDCR3ART8 _ 10B027 J.G. TUCKER L SON. INC. $1.949.07 INSTRUMENT PARTS 108828 U.S. AUTO CLASS CENTER.IMC. 5190.00 TRUCK PARTS 1 nfl629 ___ .U.S. WATER NEWS._ ___ __._._-._-- ASS..fG,__.....__. .__. SORSCRIPTION,_ 108830 UNOCAL 5270.71 ONLE.IDED GASOLINE 108831 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $143.92 PARCEL SERVICES 1BB832- YYP..SC1CtlIlElC_ SUFPLIES _ 10OR33 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO 93,002.61 FITTINGS 108834 VAREC DIVISION 5396.28 INSTRUMENT REPAIR 108835-.. ....... .C. K. VARNER_.CO.. INC. ...__.._._ - 939.3.76.. __. .__ _ _ BUILDING MATERIALS_.____.____ 100836 VERTEX SYSTEMS 1975.00 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 108637 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $513.33 SAM" SUPPLIES ACROSS CARL.WARREIL i_CCA___ S27J..lI ___._._.... .. _INSURANCE_CLAIMSADJUSTER___- 108839 WESTERN CORPORATE IMAGES $932.90 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 108840 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY 933,014.48 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-9-89 VILLDAN ASSOCIALES ,. 96.0AB61n71-. __.._. ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-26-2.2-17 -_.__._ 100842 ROURKE S WOODRUFF $39,625.73 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.6-4-89 108643 WORDPERFECT CORP. S1T6.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE FUNC NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE $164190 PACE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 . __ .__ .-.. _LLDNTI_SANI TC TI ON III SIR ICIS DE-OBANGE_COUNSP. �. CLAIMS PAID 08/15/90 POSTING DATE 06/15/94 VAGRANT No. �E6noR AMOUNT PESSAtp ON ID0044 XE40X CORP. 13,696.75 C0 m LEASES 9A95_____.____.OE.ORGE_1N8DLELSONP.A NY_. Av86.2t -__-.---_r__-_ a --__._-_3 1Me D1AL_CLA Pero a6n R/vo v.Pa6.77A.8R__.. eeece=eevvveecvee SUN"" A10N[ _ /2 OPER TUN0 6 3.959.28 ----�- - /2 CAP PAC FUND 163.059.38 __t3 D?U FRRD.__. .. __ - _..-15.729..01 IRS OPBR PURR - _- _.___.___.._ —_ 217.36 /5 CAP FAC FUND 28.332.21 T X _ /7 OPER POND 10.657.61 /7 CAP PAC PUND 5.691.65 t,* _. 011 OPER_FVHD .. _- _._ .. _ --.-_-13.961.38_ 170_- _ /Id OPER . -�Ib- Ild CAP PAC AC P FORD 15.916916.9292 761/ 4 OPPR _FORD .9_ 82 1 _ JT OPER FUND 691.508.67 Ck CORD 180.397.13 '_8ae 1''UBDEp.NORKISPS_C0 RA P IN60NCB - JT DIST BOREIPG CAPITAL TONS 129.677.93 - 9 1.268.774.84 T. J FUND NO 9199 JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/23/90 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 ' - CLAIMS PAID 08/29/90 POSTING DATE 00/29/90 . 108904 ABC PAINT STRIPING SERVICE 11.990.00 PAINT SUPPLIES 108906 MAS SYSTEMS 5379.44 INSTRUMENT. 1 0 108907 AT S T $590.70 7012FHONE SERVICE 7. 108909 ACTION-MARTIN S930.75 IDOL CII¢Si 108910 ADAMSON UNIFORM 1 EQUIP. S1.0AB.69 LAB SUPPLIES 108912 AIR ACCESSORIES Co. S533.48 COMPRESSOR PARTS 108913 AIR PRODUCTS 6 CHEMICAL INC. $15,296.00 O6M AGREEMENT - UKICEI GENERATION SYSTEM M.O. 8-9- 'e 108915 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT $29.97 ASPHALT 108916 LEASING ASSOC IATES/ILLSTATE $249.31 AUTOMOBILE LEASES -:. 108918 ALPHAGA2 9437.20 PROPANE X 108919 BOSCO INC. S/OR AMERICAN SEALS 21.725.60 HARDWARE I 108921 AMERITECH S97.75 COPIER LEASES Ib 1U0922 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $3,500.00 SEWER REPAIRS DIST 3 4. 10E924 ANINTER WIRE R CABLE S592.07 CONFUTER PARpI- 100925 ANTHONY•$ MECN. R MACHINE. INC $1.634.25 PUlE PARTO � _ _A� I H 108927 AQUATIC CENTER S400.00 AIR CAROB i 108928 AAATEI SERVICES. INC. $4.109.22 UNIFORM RENTALS 108930'. FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 3167.463.08 GRIT GENOVA N.O: 10-29-96 t 108981' BACKSTREET GALLERY S1t9.21 - ' YRAlf[110 BERVICRS 1OB933 P.Y. SAROTTI AND ASSOC. S6.125.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PI-34-2.P2-37.P2-23-6 100934 0. BATEMAN $555.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION I,ni I, I AS 6UPPbIBfi 108936 BAYLESS STATIONERS 1 $99.91 OFFICE SUPPLIES` - 106937 BEARINGS B DRIVES. INC. $2,040.85 HARDWARE ' OY 0 BBPERRES-BBIg21 PAY UPEE 108939 SOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE S162.00 RADIATOR REPAIR 108940 90N-A-RUES $515.01 TRUCK PARTS 6T#06i 108942 BROWN 0 CALDUELL $1.990.00 LAB SERVICES 108943 STEVE BUBALO CONSTRUCTION CO. $2 91.390.22 CONSTRUCTION 14-l-IB UE-.lAIWUSlR3dLC0RP 24 H9TRU8PION-3 109945 THE BURKE COMPANY $99.59 INSTRUMENT PART IOP946 BURKE, ENGINEERING CO. $561.57 E.¢CTRIC SUPPLIES BRViff EIYEBES NO-B 106948 GARY G. STREED $873.46 PETIT CASH "MBORS== 108949 BUTLER PAPER COMPANY 1221.53 OFFICE SUPPLIES J ' � J FUND NO 9109 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/23/9C PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CLAIMS PAID 08/29/90 POSTING DATE 08/29/90 ' 208950 CPT COPP. / SUMMIT SOLUTIONS 94,076.10 SERVICE AGREEMENTS 106952 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH, INC. f31T.69 US SUPPLIES. 108953 CAL-PAC CHEMICAL CO., INC. $358.34 CHEIUEMS 108955 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS 2318.900.62 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-36,P2-42,P1-34 I0E956 CHRISTINE I. CARR S630.00 COMPUTER INPUT SERVICES F 08958 - CENTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM S5sD15.60 TELBPEONS SYSTEM MOUIFICAIIOBS 00959 CHAMPION FENCE CO• f6.557.00 PENDING C8961 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT . fS6B.51 SAPE17 SUPPLIES 08962 COAST INSURANCE AGENCY f691.00 INSURANCE 08964 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF $1.406.25 SHAFTOB9d5 - CONARD°S PHOTOGRAPHY $223.13 PHOTOGRAPHIC Slum 69mX0896T CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. $9.026.59 ELECTRICAL SORLIEI08968 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS $1.114.53 BLUEPRINEIMG ii;.; 108970 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC - f2.511.34 E.ECIEIC SUPPLIES —11 108971 DAVID WILLIAM CRAPNELL - f16B.S0 BROCHRRE SLID,Im O 109973 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 9716.39 TINES I N ° I08974 TOM OAYCS f39.58 MEETING EEPEHSE >: 1089T6 DECO i '7L{::; {3.80 - ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 308977 DEZURIN AND/DR,CS CO. ,{4 -f7B 9.Oi REMID SUPPLIES I J ' IOE979 GUNNEL BROS. MACH MOVING $1.599.52 SPACE RENTAL J-19A 10898D DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $1.313.09 PARRT SUPPLIES - 108982 U.-M• EBERT.CORP. - - f996109.00 CONSTRUCTION 5-354 q ji5 ' 108983 ELECTRO-TEST. INC. $975.00 ELECTRIC REPAIRS IP8985 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. f551.1lD LAB SAMPLES 10R986 JOSEPH EVANS flOs DOD.OC DEFERRED COMP EMERGENCY W/D MSE 108980 DODGE CONSTRUCTIDW NEWS S119.00 ADV8RE8ING - ID8989 FACILITIES SUPPORT CO. $577.74 ELECTRIC PARTS en 1111E u Fe e..R_ 108991 JOHN B. FALKENSTEIN P.C. f3,609.0D CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-4, J-20,J-17 100992 FAPP SALES 6 SERVICE $806.38 ELECTRIC PARTS 108994 FERRELLGAS $51.36 PROPANE . . 108995 CHEMWEST, INC. f158.95 MECBARICAL SUPPLIES - J FUND NO 4159 - JT DIST YOPKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0/23/9C PACE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CLAIMS PAID 08/29/90 POSTING DATE 08/29/90 I08996 FISHER CONSTRUCTION CO. S330.00 PUBLICATION 108998. FOUNTAIN VALLEY CARER& f1.019.60 CAMSRA/YELN 108999 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT f357.43 SAPEIT SUPPLIES ° 5 ---•M I&TR GNPP6EIM 109001 CITY OF FRESNO S515.39 FETING "INSURSEVEN' 109002 A.F. PREY $105.00 DEFERRED COHY DISMBOTIOM a 109004 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $7.412 60 'TELEPE0116 SERVICES' 109005 GEOFON. INC. $6.310:09 ERCIHE6RINC SERVICES DIST 5 ° 10900T DON GREEK 6 ASSOCIATES $4.342.50 SURVEY SERVICES US BO-72- I' 109008 HACH COMPANY $1.952.12 LAB SUPPLIES ° N f3T�1096 10 HARR INOTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 9028.73 :; PLOlmIK6 PLLtO 109011 - HATCH f KIRK. INC. $2.602.82 NECSAHICA6 PARTS m ' X ° 109013 HILT7. INC. S9.392.76 HARD M 109014 DONALD D. HONOMPCHL $300.00 DEFERRER COMP DISTRIBUTION HOUSE OF BATTERIES• . f2.001.23 Mti®IBB 'F. -J 10901� R.S. XU6NE5 Co.. INC. t31 S.YS 's PAINT 80PPLi88 • ' .t " ^t` C7 109019 HUNTINGTON SUPPLY $9.54 HARDNARE 1 W 109020 TMO INDUSTRIES t112 INSTRUMENT PARTS$4 *63 109022 '1,-P... IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL ,.f0E�79 A.IJ 19SBIIOUS cmm" M.0.6-11-90 109023 : INDUSTRIAL THREADED. PRODUCTS i1.Y01.2A comm" ' 109025 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $4.262.81 EQUIPMENT RENTAL -� 109026 INSIDE E.P.A. WEEKLY REPORT $56.25 PUBLICATPON d 109022# %jJ;, GREAT WESTERN SANITARY BURP. flr176.70 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 109029 JAYS CATERING 9949.S6 IIERTIEC MUSE 109031 JOYCE OFFICE PRODUCTS S172.13 OFFICE SUPPLIES 109032 KALLEEN°S COMPUTER SUPPLIES 3849.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES 109039. KAMER COMPANY $1.333.20 TOOLS 209035' - KELLY SERVICES f5.1BO.13 TEMPORARY SERVICES KO.--I— "R- 233.90 BORSTR00£i0R-5 ' 109037 KIMMEALE BROS., INC. 9523.71 SEALS IP9P30 KING BEARING, INC. $5.393.63 MACHINE SUPPLIES 109040 HEL KOEHN 31.567.50 TEMPORARY SERVICES 109041 MARTIN KORDICK. 5A . $3.024.95 CONSTROCTION SERVICES 5-35-1 FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8125/99 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CLAIMS PAID OS/29/90 POSTING DATE 06/29/90 1F 09042 L 6 C TIRE SERVICE $63.33 TRUCK PARTS 309044 LEERS 6 NORTHRUP 13.756.97 MECHANICAL PARTS _ 109045 LEWCO ELECTRIC CO. - fU0.95 iROCR PARTS' - a 209047 JOHN LISEE PUMPS, INC. 33,722.65 PIRG' PARTS 109040 LOCAL AGENCY $750.00 LAFCO FCE , 209050 "PS - $1,622.18 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES ° 109051 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS, INC. - $455.90 MECHANICAL PARTB 10 109053 DON MAURER S4,000.00 OCEAN STUDY 1 109054 MAXWELL COLORS SIS.32 PHOTO PROCESSING 109056 NCKENN4 ENGR. R EQUIP. $6.494.06 FUIR PAM i 109057 MCMASTER-CARP SUPPLY CO. 1141.47 HARDWARE m X 109C59 MERLIN CONROLS CO. f90.5B PLUMBING SUPPLIES ._-. 109060 TROMPS R. MELTON 5286.37 MILEAGE MUSE W 109962 : MILLAR ELEVATOR SERVICE -...$479.66 ELEVATOR NAIMIENEMGB - " 109063 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO. ". 5331.T8 SA!6ET SUPPLIES, C7 1 109065 MONTROY SUPPLY CO. $41.56 HARDWARE t 109066 MOTION INDUSTRIES, INC. 91.535.66 HARDWARE 109068 MOTOR OLA CELLULAR SERVICES -f9T.71 CZLLUAR TELEPEONE e8RHC6 119,19 . NATIONAL LUMBER 3390.42 RARDNME u. 109071 GUST K. NEWBERG COMET. CO. S2.054,463.62 CONSTRUCTION PI-33 109072 NEWARK ELECTRONICS S24.16 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 109074 r-' O.M.E./SOLAG DISPOSAL CO $4.165.00 TRASH BINS 109075 DX SYSTEMS CO. f6B.721.93 CB.ORINH M.0.2-14-90 109P77 ORANGE BEARING, INC. 9937.15 MECHANICAL PARTS 109078 ORANGE COAST HARDWOOD 6 $412.63 BUILDING MATERIALS 109000 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. 11,696.02 C®BCALS 109081 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY CO. $174.88 GROUD COVER 9DRP _ORANGE VALVE A FITTING SO- 1531.31 PTWTynv 109003 OXYGEN SERVICE $993.76 SPECIALTY CASES 109084 COUNTY OF ORANGE f450.00 MAPPING SERVICES NTT 9lNLLAtJD 10908E ROBERT L. CITRON $150.00 DEPERED DUMP - PICK1.Bfl. 109087 P.J. RADCLIFFE K SONS . $280.00 CONSOTLING SERVICES J , FUND NO 9199 - J7 DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE R/25/90 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP93 CLAIMS PAID 08/29/90 POSTING DATE O8/29/90 ° IO9088 PSI S205.36 TRUCK PARTS 109090 PSSI f27].SS TV SERVICE ° 109091 PACIFIC PARTS t1.16T.3B INSTRIDOUM' FARTO . e S 109093 PACIFIC BELL S677.59 TELEPHONE SERVICE ' 109094 PACIFIC TRUCK EQUIPMENT S206.01 TRUCK PART ° 109096 PEAT, MARWICK, MAIN S CO, $5.000.00 AUDITING BEK9ICE8 M.0.3-9-BB ' 109097 ROY PENOERGRAFT S409.00 DBPERRRB COMP DISIRIBBTION ° 109099 POLYPURE. INC. t23.701.44 POLYMERS M.0.1-10-90.8-9-89 1 ' 199100 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. $501.82 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 309IO2 ' POWER TRAIN INDUSTRIES $727.69 SAnn SUPPLIES ' 109103 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $344.00 ICE ' m X1 109105 PUBLIC TELEPHONE 125D.98 TELEPHONE SYSTEM = 109106 DNS, INC. S117B0.00 COMPUTER SUPPLIES °�.;.109108 .. REMEDY TEMP 62.AY6.98 TEVORART:SBR71CB8 '.1". �I 109109 REMOTE METER RESETTING SYSTEM $3.000.00 rotv BTAGE 1 209111 TNC PCP US LIC SUPPLY CO. :S62.20 PLUNGING SUPPLIES L71 109112 ROACH WATER TECHNOLOGY, INC. t2S1.18 BOILER PART commumm- 119114.. J. R. ROBERTS SS86,021.31 CONSTRVCTIONJ ll t .ji1 7r;Y•?}, „ 109115 J. R. ROBERTS . .. .S19,915.69 CONSTRUCTION J-20 109137 ROSEMOUNTIUNILOC 92R7.97 IN9TRERNT SUPPLIES 209118 MICHAEL ROZENGURT S1,116.44 MEETING EXPENSE 109120 SANCDN ENGINEERING , INC. $533.272.58 CONSTRUCTION S-33R • '.i t y1y'>• '�' 109121 SCHULER ENGINEERING CORP. - 8273.611.44 CONSTRUCTION P1-27-162 BP bum 109123 SEWER EQUIP. CO. OF AMERICA f169.90 Main PARTS 109124 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $390.92 TGOLS 109126 SLIDE MASTER $216.50 BLUES 109127 SMITH-EMERY CO. 12,570.00 BOIL TESTING M.0.6-16-89 7 PLUMBING-8UPP6108 209129 SOFT WAREHOUSE, WESTERN REGION S3R9.56 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 109130 SOFT WAREHOUSE fI,6.76 COMPUTER SOFTWARE saRDa•••�^ sl.sao 0MAINTENANCE �om 109132 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. 2119.715.91 POWER 109133 SO. CAL. GAS CO. $1.334.27 RATURAL GAS 1 , FUND O 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING GATE 8123799 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER 4P43 d:b CLAIMS PAID 08/2919D POSTING DATE 06/29/9S e ' 109134 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. 116.391 .55 DIESEL FUEL a M . 109136 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO..INC• - 1292.J0 INSTR01@RP PART 199137 STAMEN Z. SPASSOFF. P.E. s3•890.00 ENGIHCERINO SERVICES PE-36 2 43, 80 199139 STAR TOOL S SUPPLY CO. $161.12 TOOLS 109140 STERLING ART 1195.8E ART SUPPLIES 109142 SUN-BELT LANDSCAPE 6 MAINT. 11.B47.1 CONTRACT GRODNDEEEEPING tl 0.8-9-69 - 109143 SUNSET FORD f93.55 TRUCK PARTS 109145 SUPER CHEM CORP 9371.R7 CHEMICALS 109146 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL. INC. $2.281.27 TOOLS ;f 1093A8 TAUBER ELECTRONICS 1470.05 EAlP EB i<. 1091 R9 TAYLOR-DUNN S139.82 ELECTRIC CART PARTS m 109151 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD S5.057.52 N6NTAL EQUIm" x 109152 TMA/NORCAL f946.00 LAM SERVICES sPnwmn CU1 18.)154 TILLINGHAST pf1J239.00 CON6ULTENC SERVICES § RISE ANALYSIS -A ?' 269155 TONY•$ LOCK 6 SAFE SERVICE 9196.23 EEY9 C7 109157 TRUCK 6 AUTO SUPPLY. INC. 11.611.75 TRUCK PARTS 109158 TRUCKWARE $327.25 TROT PARTS .': 109160 UNION SIGN CO. '3182.36 SIGNS T 109161 UNITED CONCRETE COMPANIES 1961.70 CONCRETE ,.•, 109163 VWR SCIENTIFIC l3.632:67 LAB SUPPLIES 109164 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. f1.72066 PIPE 6 FITTINGS VAN LEEUWEN PIPE 6 TUBE '"$823.66 PIPE 309161 VAREC DIVISION '$1,393.59 MECHANICAL PARTS Y' ' 1a.-+s 2RUR-PSPAIRS 109169 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY AVIS.26 SAFETY SUPPLIES 109170 CARL WARREN 6 CO. 620B.95 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 109172' WELLS FARGO GUARD SERVICE S2.310.81 SECURITY SERVICES ' 109373 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY $63,256.08 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.B-8-89 R 109175 WILCON IND. $193.41 INSTRUMENT PART I09I76 VILLDAN ASSOCIATES S1.498.97 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-26 109118 K-TREE CO. - 3159.38 CE@UT1E SOFIVARE 109179 XEROX CORP. $2,550.00 COPIER LEASES - FUND NO 9199 — JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/23/90 PAGE T REPORT NUMBER AP43 CLAIMS PAID OB/29/90 POSTING DATE 08/29/96 ° 109100 GEORGE YARDLEY COMPANY 9805.16 PALP83 109102 IIEBARTN AND ALPER S572°009.15 CONSTBUMOO P2-37 1 0 109153 RICMRAD S. EDGAR- $200.00 DEFER= COMP DISITUBMON ° TOTAL CLAIMS FAID DA129/90 39,185,070.85 AMOUNT PI CAP PAC FUND O 1,085.63 e F3 CAP PAC FORA - - 2,221.65 T 93 OP6R PBMD 575,869.37 05 OPER FUND 5.721.55 OS CAP PAC FUND 244.631.26 /1 OPBR POND 1,335:04 i• _ iy �t..^f WCAP PAC FOND - 50,998.69 P14 CAP PAC FUND 142,608.22 /566 OPER FOND 2.483.93 #661'OPER POND.. P7616 OPT FUND3.919.69 CORP 7,027,301.19 SELF FUNDED WORRORS COMP INSUmCB 12,781.28 = 9.185.070.85 ------------ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA '= P.O.BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 9272MI27 105"ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 �I (710)962.2411 September 27, 1990 Mr. Barry McPhee Editor, Earth Alert! P.O. Box 69193 West Hollywood, CA 90069 Subject: Orange County Sanitation Districts' Balanced, Total Environmental Management Program It was with considerable dismay that I read your Spring 1990 "Earth Alert! Bulletin" article on the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Sanitation Districts) . We certainly encourage and welcome dialogue and comment on our wastewater management program because we believe that straightforward, open `../ and factual communication goes a long way in identifying, addressing and resolving the issues. But your article contains so many inaccuracies that you have done a real disservice to any ecologically-minded citizen or organization with a sincere interest and dedication to responsible, overall environmental. protection. It was irresponsible to publish it without getting all your facts straight. For example, after reading your article, one could be led to the misguided conclusion that the Sanitation Districts are not concerned with preserving the marine ecology. Nothing could be further from the truth! The Directors and staff of the Sanitation Districts take great pride in our accomplishments. We are recognized as one of the leading wastewater management agencies in the country. The success of our programs in protecting the beneficial uses of the ocean resources off orange County's coastline and providing balanced, total environmental management is supported by the results of our ongoing ocean monitoring program in which we invest more than $2,000,000 each year; and is exemplified by the numerous federal, state and regional awards we have received. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUN". CAUFOANIA +UEAA Ews AVENUE ?o.eaz 8127 Mr. Bar McPhee Barry iOUN,MM vEl1FY.GUEUII 92n94+27 September 27, 1990 01A+eez2.1 1 What is particularly disturbing is that to the best of my knowledge you have not visited the Sanitation Districts in person to see our operations first-hand and to discuss and fully acquaint yourself with our wastewater management program. I will, therefore, give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that the inaccurate and misleading statements in your article are a result of a lack of information and understanding about our commitment and our programs, rather than an intentional distortion of the facts. Our staff has worked closely with other Earth Alert! representatives in the past to provide accurate and updated information on our wastewater management program and the improved conditions of the marine environment off Orange County's coast. Unfortunately, you have not accurately portrayed this information to your readers. Your article fails to recognize the truly responsible environmental protection programs we conduct. We would, therefore, like to take this opportunity to set the record straight. When the article mentions our application for renewal Of our National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for ocean discharge of treated wastewater issued under the provisions of Section 301(h) of the Clean Water Act, it incorrectly states the Sanitation Districts dump partially treated sewage offshore. This is not true. We provide a blend of 53% full secondary treatment and 47% advanced primary treatment to produce a high quality wastewater effluent which meets all California state requirements and those established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under the provisions of Section 301(h) of the Clean Water Act. Section 301(h) provides for a high-quality but less than full secondary ocean discharge for only those POTW's that can prove their discharge will not adversely impact marine water quality. We consistently achieve all of the water quality criteria of the California Ocean Plan and EPA's Gold Book. Contrary to the misstatement in the article, the EPA's and State of California's issuance of our modified NPDES permit has eD�v S allowed the dumping of untreated sewage into coastal waters. In terms of placing any ocean impacts into perspective, you need to understand that if equivalent volumes of pure drinking water were pumped through our outfall, the marine ecosystem would also be impacted. The effects would be somewhat different, but, overall, the changes would not be that discernable. Your statement regarding our preference to having sludge trucked to landfills over recycling is inaccurate and has no basis in fact. The Sanitation Districts have made every effort to maximize the reuse of sludge through production of soil 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 01 ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFOPNIA 109 EW AVENUE 00.80.819 Mr. Barry McPhee EOUNfA01 VAUEV.csuw Ez�zea+zE September 27, 1990 91.9E 1+ amendments or direct land application. We have contracts with three private firms to accomplish this. The Sanitation Districts have no desire to have sludge landfilled if there are other uses and options readily available and the sludge quantities produced can be safely recycled. The policy of the Sanitation Districts is to seek 100% recycling of all of our sludge. Two years ago, all of our sludge went to landfills. Today, well over half of it is recycled. Before the end of this year, we expect to be recycling two-thirds of our sludge. As you can see, we are actively involved in a well- planned, systematic expansion of our program to achieve 100% recycle. However, there are regulatory and environmental facts- of-life we must consider. For instance, we place volume restrictions on our commercial composters and reusers based on regulatory requirements and the capacity of the firm to safely and effectively utilize the sludge, and ensure ongoing disposal reliability. This reflects our concern for proper environmental . management. Our policy is to have several sludge management options to maintain maximum operational flexibility and - reliability and to minimize environmental impacts. Another blatant misrepresentation is in your "Statement of `.� Purpose+' wherein you state that the Sanitation Districts intend to dump raw sludge into the ocean off Huntington Beach. This is untrue. Nearly ten years ago, the Sanitation Districts proposed and received sponsorship from the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to evaluate the feasibility of discharging preconditioned, treated sludge into deep ocean waters (in excess of 1,000 feet deep) through a proposed submarine outfall. A research plan was completed by the California Institute of Technology with the help of over 20 scientists and regulators representing various agencies and institutions. The Clean Water Act was amended in 1987 to allow for the Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to issue a five-year research permit for such a project, only if and when deemed appropriate. However, before a determination would be made on whether such a project could proceed, there would be a lengthy and complex study, review, and approval process. It would include feasibility studies, pre-application environmental studies, an extensive application to the Administrator of EPA, detailed review by EPA, public workshops and hearings, a final determination by EPA, and extensive monitoring evaluated by an independent scientific panel. only after the environmental concerns raised by qualified scientists were satisfied would a J 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .1 ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFOXNIA 1p EW8 AVENUE Mr. Barr McPhee ?' .Eo%E1xJ y iWMMN VILLEY.WUFOHNII 9272E.E tdJ September 27, 1990 n+al xex.aAn permit be issued to conduct such a research project. If a permit was issued, we would be obligated by the Clean Water Act to maintain alternative sludge reuse or disposal methods so that we could return to those other land-based methods if adverse effects were encountered during the research project. Sanitation Districts' staff and Directors are committed to do everything to ensure that no adverse impacts occur if the project were ever to move forward. It is important for you to understand that the Sanitation Districts are committed to evaluating all possible means of wastewater and wastewater solids disposal and reuse. In fact, we have a rather aggressive program toward that end. Available options of all types were studied as part of our 30-year Wastewater Master Plan completed in July of 1989 . This comprehensive study included preparation of an Environmental Impact Report which evaluated three different levels of treatment and over 40 sludge disposal/reuse options. Wastewater reclamation was also examined as an important option. As a result of this study, the Sanitation Districts have embarked on a number of new projects and directions which are continually being reevaluated as we move ahead with our programs. We are `./ implementing wastewater reclamation to supplement the existing programs in Orange County which are already the most progressive in the State of California. Industrial source control of toxics is the cornerstone of our program of environmental and public health protection. Through our 15-year-old program, (which preceded EPA's standards for industrial categorical limits by seven years) , we. have successfully controlled the discharge of pollutants to levels that are so low that the raw sewage entering our wastewater treatment facilities is actually better than the effluent discharge standards for full secondary treatment imposed by the EPA and the State of California on our ocean discharge. Over the last 15 years we have reduced toxic heavy metals by 80% and have eliminated detectable levels of DDT, PCB, and most pesticides from our wastewater. Our accomplishments in industrial source control speak for themselves and have shifted the costs of treatment to where it belongs - at the industry - and have saved the rate-paying public millions of construction and operating dollars for sewerage service. As noted above, we continue to perform one of the most extensive ocean monitoring programs in the country and are continuously 4 " COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS el ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFOPNIA +mm aLs avExuz Mr. Barry McPhee •n.ew nz, uuranws 92rn.e+27 \011 September 27, 1990 nuiee:.zu+ evaluating the data of this unprecedented program to determine if any short-term or long-term adverse trends are evident. The Sanitation Districts will further amend our industrial source control program and wastewater .treatment plan if environmental monitoring results ever indicate a need for change. I might also add that the Sanitation Districts have an ongoing wastewater treatment facilities construction program that is well planned and adequately financed. Despite what your article implied, during the next 30 years we will spend more than $1.5 billion for facilities expansions and improvements to ensure that we can continue to accommodate the increasing sewerage service demands placed on our system and meet the stringent environmental and public health standards of both state and federal regulations. This effort is quite independent of the question of full secondary treatment. We are confident from direct monitoring evidence that our existing wastewater treatment program is protecting the marine environment. We believe that the $1.4 billion in savings attributable to the 301(h) provision of the Clean Water Act over the next 30 years is an important consideration along with the significant adverse environmental impacts which would result from implementing full secondary treatment. These include more impacts to land from sludge disposal, greater energy use, much greater use of natural resources, and greater air emissions. We believe that by evaluating our impacts on all of the environmental media (land, air, and water) and implementing a balanced, efficient and effective wastewater management program we have minimized the overall environmental effects of our operations. We have taken this approach rather than simply meeting an arbitrary level of treatment without regard to impacts on air, land, energy, and economic resources. Virtually every societal activity has an impact on the environment. Our job, yours and mine, as environmentalists, is to manage and balance those impacts so that their effects are minimized and public health and the environment are protected. Our record demonstrates that we are successfully accomplishing this mission. We would hope that Earth Alert! would share our concern and interest in providing for net overall benefits to the environment, and we hope to continue our dialogue. Enclosed for your information are booklets which summarize in more detail our 5 t COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 21 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 1 B EWE EWE Mr. Bar McPhee oo,2o%ERJ Barry fOUNIMN V4P0 BOXa12CALIMNiG E2722-019 September 27, 1990 9141SM4411 recently adopted 30-year plan of action for wastewater management and environmental protection, along with a general information brochure on the Sanitation Districts. I would encourage you to contact me to arrange for a visit to our operations and to discuss your concerns with our scientific and technical staff regarding our programs. We hope that you are receptive to making a balanced presentation of our programs to your readers in the future. Since y, J ne S JWS:dms ger REF #030143.1tr Enclosures CC: Board Members, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Patrick Wall, Earth Alert! Daniel McGovern, Regional Administrator, EPA Region 9 Gerald Thibeault, Executive Officer, California RWQCB #8 Doug Rogers, Sierra Club 6 J 1 DRUMMY GARRETT KING & HARRISON A COPPORARDN ATTORNEYS AT LAW .NNR 2 NAI PICIM YOxPO 2200 PARK CENTER O TWLLRY FIAOR AREA COD. 11 xx opWII2R ✓LNL P1V6 TELEPHONE EEO YA 1800 \_rJ1�Y COSTA MESA. CA LIFO RNIA BEB2B R.x/.WgOx u!/.A ETYxMI DIRECT ALL MAIL TO:0.O. BOX 6080 T.LLCOPIER OHI 050 .800 AP�y q� Imi.. �EOilxo COSTA MESA. CALIFORNIA 02620 AERsw L0 6431.002 APARTND,IIR,..A PPYx) I...aP.wawa Y.. .E. xNP�� .DXII. OO..EIK .ER.E.RA Imn.moEw Txe:r E.mrrw MAY October 1, 1990 .P.YIP..wD.� oPuoIPPLIAMMIP. w.E..w Lwxw.x .M.NME.L=. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 re: Construction of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-lA; Public Bearing, 10-10-90 Gentlemen: This letter shall serve as notice that Mesa Verde Country Club intends to appear at the hearing in the matter of the adoption of a Proposed Resolution of Necessity to Acquire Mesa Verde Country Club's property by eminent domain on October 10, 1990, at 7:30 P.M. , at the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County's Board Room, and requests to be heard on the matter of the adoption of the Resolution of Necessity. Very truly yours, CHARLES W. PARRET for DRUMMY GARRETT RING & HARRISON CWP:dv Southern California Edison Company P.O.BOX Goo 32GC WALNUT GRO ...UE ROBEMEgO.ONUI N W 91T 0 WlLL E.p BBERPUNL uw cevwmME,rt TElevrone •E9A9 CWNNi 1a1 e1]"3. oe2 October 5, 1990 BY FEDERAL EXPRESS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. Boa 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 Re: NOTICE OF NEARING IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF A PROPOSED RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY TO ACQUIRE PROPERTY BY EMINENT DOMAIN FOR A PUBLIC P13RPOSE DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 1990 Ladies and Gentlemen: Southern California Edison Company ("Edison") hereby files this written request to appear and be heard at the public hearing of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 6, 7, and 14 of Orange County, California currently scheduled for Wednesday, October 10, 1990 at 7:30 p.m. , regarding construction of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A. The spokesperson appearing on behalf of Edison at the hearing will be Mr. Jim Kennedy. This request to appear and be heard is made pursuant to the provisions of Section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure and related sections . Any questions regarding Edison' s request to appear and be heard may be addressed to the undersigned. Very truly yours, . WED:hs:218 -- LAW OFFICES JAMES F. SLACKSTOOK' SULLIVAN, WORKMAN & DEE MAUINO ADDRESS CNARLEE F.CALLANAN POST OFF ICE EOK 110E CNARLEE D. CUMMI NOS LOEANOELEA QIEOOITOEOY JOxx J. OEE TWELFTH FLOOR JOeLPX e. D21 DA P•UL C. EPBTEIN 800 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET TELECOPI6R(ElEI 03LHE0 p ARY•. KOVACIO JON NE. MACKELIII LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90017-2621 ERIEAT E. SANCHEZ TELEPHONE(213) 624-6644 MOLLY A. BELL.A. PLEABEREFERTO ARTXUR A.SMALL II OUR FILE NQ ROGER M.SULLIVAN* NENRV IL WORKMAN ••==0....ION•L...PAR•T... 11522.0011 October 9, 1990 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS County Sanitation Districts Nos. 6, 7, and 14 of Orange County CA 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Re: Public Hearin Re Resolution of Necessity Wednesday. October 10. 1990 at 7:30 P.M. Gentlemen: This letter is submitted on behalf of Magna Enterprises, Inc. ("Magna" hereafter) , leases of the premises at 1520 Nutmeg Place, Costa Mesa CA. We object to the proposed Resolution of Necessity relating to the construction of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A. our objection is based on the fact the project as now proposed constitutes an unnecessary and improper use of the power of eminent domain. It is undisputed by your own staff that construction of the proposed sewer line is feasible within Harbor Boulevard. Thus it is possible to construct the project without using eminent domain and taking private property. Sound public policy, we submit, dictates that public agencies should avoid taking private property whenever a reasonable alternative is available. It is only common sense that the sewer line should be placed in Harbor Boulevard where the public already has easement rights. There is no need to spend public money to acquire new easement rights and there is no need to take property from private owners. A realignment of the project is the appropriate solution. For the agencies to insist on using eminent domain is arbitrary, capricious and unconscionable. We refer to, and by this reference, repeat again the objections to the proposed alignment which are made in our �� letters to you of November 17, 1989 and March 14, 1990. L A W OFFI C E S SULLIVAN, WORKMAN & DEE Gentlemen October 9, 1990 Page 2 No personal appearance will be made at the hearing of October 10, 1990. We ask that this letter of objection be brought to the attention of the respective agency members and be made a part of the record of the hearing. Additionally, we associate ourselves with whatever - objections which. may be made by Harbor Mesa Trust, our landlord, at the hearing. Very truly yours, Ernest E. Sanchez SULLIVAN, WORKMAN & DEE cc: Mr. Joseph Magna ... . .. —0ZT'3B-r9ff-3deg1 CAFFLSHITFI P.2 OARLSMITH BALL WICHMAN MURRAY OAS$ MUBAI & ICHIBI ATTORNEYS AT LAW HONOLULU OFFICE APART NLIICMIPINCLYDI NO".CORPORATIONS .160 OFFICE TELEPHONE local auaaOO 30I EAST OCEAN BOULEVARD,SUITS 700 TELEPHONE Iw09ae•ae.. FAX Ia0a1 5E3•0ey FAX local a3a-0a7a LONG BEACH,CALIFORNIA 9080E-4e26 LOa ANGELEa•COWNTCWN OFFICE NONA OFFICC TELEPHONE OEM Eaa•1200 TELEPHONE 16011319 a.a. FAX.IC1910EY009E TELEPHONC lo121<Oa•a601 FAX loon au•"aa FAX IEIOI a0TJ7a0 LOa ANOELEE•WNAHloCOFPICE Iola,aa0•HTl NAVI OFFICE TELEPHONE 40 037•0000 TELEPHONE 16001 Ey.aaa FNI NIIa1 W E•Olai rAN u00¢4.07. GUAM OFFICE EAIPAN OFFICE TE1.EPNONEHI711A71-Gal3 October 10, 1990 TELEPHONE(670)08D0.a0 FAX FAX l0101333•3308 Coe Reference N0.1 Orange County Sanitation District PLiASN_e No. 6, 7 and 14 10844 Ellis ,Avenue mountain Valley, CA 92708 Res Resolution of Necessity for the Baker-Gisler Interceptor Dear Orange County Sanitation Districts This letter is submitted on behalf of Harbor Mesa Trust, owner of the property commonly described as 1520 Nutmeg Place, Costa Mesa, California. We join in the objection of Magna Enterprises, Inc. to the proposed Resolution of Necessity relating to the construction of the Baker-Gislar Interceptor. Magna Enterprises, Inc. is our tenant, The District proposes to condemn a 25 foot sewer easement along the westerly boundary of our property. The property is presently used as a parking lot. The proposed construction will displace parking used by our customers and cause business interference for a period of uncertain duration. District staff has given us time estimates ranging from one week to five months . We feel that this constitutes unreasonable interference with both our property rights and our businesses. The District has an option which is both less burdensome to us and lase costly to taxpayers. This option is to route the interceptor along Harbor Boulevard where public right-of-way already exists. This alternative does not seem to have been discussed in the SIR for this project. However, in order to make the findings that our property is necessary for this project and that the project as planned results in the "least private OCT 10 '90 14:51 CRRLSMITH HALL. LONG p,3 � Orange County Sanitation District No. 6, 7 and 14 October 10, 1990 Page 2 injury", you still have a duty to consider alternatives, even if they weren't discussed in the SIR. We also object to the findings set forth in your September 25, 2990 Notice of Hearing because they merely parrot the statutory language without giving any clue as to how they relate to the facts of this project. We object to Findings No. 2 and No. 3 because they are not supported by the evidence in the record. Harbor Mesa Trust will be represented at the hearing by Carol Herrera. We request that this letter be made a part of the record of theme proceedings. Respectfully submitted, G;M 44ti R . G�.. CYNTHIA R. GRACE CRG:br B9000840.CRG cc: Harbor Mesa Trust Attention: Carol Herrera REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN OCTOBER 10, 1990 1 ) UPCOMING MEETINGS u A. FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY. OCTOBER 17TH, AT 5:30 P.M. B. JOINT WORKS SELECTION COMMITTEE - THE JOINT WORKS SELECTION COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 24TH, AT 4:30 P.M. C. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 24TH AT 5:30 P. M. (INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS TO ATTEND:) MARGARET M. ARNOLD AND WES BANNISTER - OR - (ROLAND E. BIGONGER) - OR - (JOHN C. COX, JR . ) D. CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE - THE CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON THURSDAY, OCTOBER 25TH AT 5:30 P.M. E. BUILDING COMMITTEE - THE BUILDING COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON TUESDAY. OCTOBER 30TH AT 5:30 P. M. - END OF REPORT - - MEERNGDATE Occober .10, 1990 7111E 7 :30 P.M. OtMCM I ,2,3,5,6,7, 11 , 13 d 14 DISTRICT/ JOWBOARDS 1=4. 'II. \S(bl(A) (CPA.�u ........wNwEA...... -- (EDGAR ........PUO(ETT...... IBHAWVEIp.................ALLB! ........ ✓ O ........G (AGE) .............. IG ........ARTLLD ......ZC Or .. RLIET ....... (A{1�)....................OWMFR ... }� (BODq..........STANION ..... GYEDAN ................... — �,�QMTRICr MOieD..............:.....GRM .......J� /AL (MIMEO .................cOY.......... ✓ MUNipq ...•...PYAGHI ......` — MAIM......................CLLVER ......JC 19CO1T).........NEU. ......... JC allcwm..................EDGAR .......� (Ram" ........lAd1YG�..... 1� — MANG..................DPNMM......JC MNNORsIM ........GTIM.........bL — — (CHE99@♦) ......:..........Gam.......J� � (YcvNyra� ......-Gms9 .......JIC — (YOUNG) ......—..........W6ET ....... 1/ y_ (GRMMYI.......IAMIDIEN'.....JC — IMUS4MEr4.................NSR......... (CULVER) .......NOW .........Jr — — (GR~ ..................MANCPR:Y..... fWEDW)-.......1GYiL.......A IDuvFA)...................MAN ......... (ECLENIOW ...NEWTON......JC — — (BLV1q .....................W.Ye,........ r ar (WLLDARNq .....9118........,c mCOm ....................REAL.........— (94NREILA)......9MTT1 .........Jc tW»M ....................GQ1oN...... — MOGq..........BTAHfON .....JC McKe ROGq............... DISIRICT3 MVN9q................... PMRD .....................R.TRaPEN...... — MWETq.........PAL4.......... r (MINER .............•.......PODS ........ IYYLES) .........9EFEN ........ (EDGIM....................PONnOUS .... (9wtVNER1......AL191 ........ b/ (®(PATS....................PUCIfETT .....Sf Y (ME) ...........ARR0.0 ......� — (9FANIOI) .................ROIH.........}C WM (GflEB-0 ........IYLGm1�Y...: 1CWq ......................9AN9WE .....�tC . MN ........GIIN........ — MuA�YeuIOND).................91EPIGx .... MA. ..........CIILVEA........ (VEESI ....................91I0$I .......r MAHONEY)......GRAHAM ......JIG — — (9A.EeDARPM.................9D.28........JC L (CHESS@!)......GMF .......JIC mAR— ` RERA) .................MUM ........Y (YOUNG) ........GWSET .......JIC — (BOTH).....................nAUTCN ......y/ (9DOYI).........HEAL .........JL — (MLLEM....................9WAN ........JL (WED.........JaBB11e...... — -� (WAIl.4TROm) ..............9ttVU .......Jl J MUM. ....... (CPAMU HYMMLGRE@q ..WAHM....... .Y IROD)..........9YANTp! ...... (PIGONGEW ................V/EL4A .......JG (WAHL9Ni01q...9YLvw........ ` MELSCl11...........I.......WEDW........J" y (TA93y0/'........WIL40N ....... /— RAsAq ...................vn 9 ........ DISTRICTS IGREET4....................VONSHUL ...._ — (MULMER)......90W..... .... — Jam)...........9AN9ONE.....�✓ — — (9TAMON) ......POd.........✓ .� DISTRICTS STAFF OTHERS MART)..........KumumR ..... MvEnER..........I't, WOODRUFF ...J� (FFRfl m".....WANNER ....... GPO'M! ............� IDE...........Jam' (9TAM Q ......POYPP.........Tr�— ANDE)ISQI.......... ANWAR ....... DISTFHCTI CUWeON ..........-..C DEMUR ........ GwF:9.............�C RHWR3...... ......ELGIN .........I� IFuac(Mckrm ETN ......®GAn........JG ...............L OWAR....... W(0.uEfl1......OOY .......... ..e -� LUIDER............. OWAM....... RI _ (YOUNG) ........G9ET ....... NB.AYP............— H HIM.........— (9TAMONI ...... smERam .......�f 00H ............... ...........— J� IWGPF........ — MAEEN) .. .....WAkNER......�, DOEEH.............� LINOHB... ... — (GBFEN) ........WANNEII......J.C— SIPEFD ............K LYNCN........ DISTRICT 11 v ENT ........... .. STONE........ _ VONLANGEN ..I....— WAGON ....... (GREEN) ......... 1EEOPE=.....�T{.�� VYN90R............Jl YOUNG ....... (SMVA)..........IMYs......... DISTRICT 12 ( Eiq .....WEDAA NaWX MTANTCq .......HEO,.fl ...... — (MRRM q ......BWH.......... — (BARfltA.H ......SINII ........-�6 DISTRICT I4 �i MLLEM ........9WM1.........JL— (HAMMOND) .....SHERIDAN.....1Ag��� (CO3 Am ........PVRDUS.....JL— — (VANTCN) ......RUM.........Y— (BARREM) ......ePOM ........J,l— oemar9P PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY OCTOBER 10, 1990 BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM Please Print Please Print F Mll d <'o CAL E b i nl 1D,,J na Z, vC,� o o C�4E� Mo Q r36, ec o� if UE— / oz vwv s "ices — Ar�/1 v C J J G q'^GS u ^^nn ^ � '' ✓. /V� nMazK I�GGS 1b0'/tC PiUl6 Cwtp. GV'e \�S1Z0. no Joh4rA h L c50 65 A,E/i94 Co. d/� 1� .bnirl 6iv7Tr�� 10/10/90 JOINT MEETING NOTES #6(a) - Report of the Joint Chairman v Joint Chairman Catlin called various meetings. SEE ATTACHED REPORT. #6(b) - Report of the General Manager The General Counsel reported that one of the agenda items was approval of an amendment to the agreement with Pimo Gro, one of the Districts' sludge reuse contractors. They apply it directly to agricultural land including cotton. He advised that the bags included in the Directors' folders were from Pimo Gro. Mr. Sylvester also noted that Earth Alert, an environmental organization, had recently made some blatant misrepresentations about the Districts. He noted that a copy of a letter from the Districts to Earth Alert was included in the Directors' folders for their information. #6(c) - Report of the General Counsel The General Counsel reported that there would be a closed session for four items later in the agenda, two of which were items of litigation. He then advised that the Directors had received with their agenda package an annual report from his office. Mr. Woodruff said the Districts can be proud that they don't have a lot of litigation but he did emphasize that while the report seems very comprehensive, many of the claims were very old. A great number of them did not require the Districts to get too involved. Some were Stop Notices and were defended by contractors. As a rule, most of them are not really major nor significant. He added that if any Director wished additional information, to see him after the meeting or give him a call . #11 - Agreement with Dames & Moore The Director of Engineering reported that the Districts had previously adopted a Disaster Plan included in the Districts' Master Plan. Future actions will include a design contract to tie down facilities such as electrical equipment, pumps, etc. Listed on the agenda that evening was an agreement for seismic studies relative to the structures themselves. Will start with a risk assessment. Many structures are new and would do well in an earthquake. Some structures are 30 years old and designed to different standards than today. We want to look at the structures and determine which ones we should fix and to what level we should fix them. Will try to categorize everything and will report back to the Board. They expressed concern re liquifaction, which is an increase in the water pressure in the soil and turns solid soil to quicksand. The Districts will go through a full earthquake training schedule and will have a simulated earthquake. He advised that the Selection Committee had negotiated a fee of $460,000 for this work. Joint Chairman Catlin commented that he had attended a meeting of WACO and saw a presentation of the problems in the Delta. We are way ahead. Said he was glad we were moving a positive direction. 10/10/90 JOINT MEETING NOTES #6(a) - Report of the Joint Chairman Joint Chairman Catlin called various meetings. SEE ATTACHED REPORT. #6(b) - Report of the General Manager The General Counsel reported that one of the agenda items was approval of an amendment to the agreement with Pimo Gro, one of the Districts' sludge reuse contractors. They apply it directly to agricultural land including cotton. He advised that the bags included in the Directors' folders were from Pimo Gro. Mr. Sylvester also noted that Earth Alert, an environmental organization, had recently made some blatant misrepresentations about the Districts. He noted that a copy of a letter from the Districts to Earth Alert was included in the Directors' folders for their information. #6(c) - Report of the General Counsel The General Counsel reported that there would be a closed session for four items later in the agenda, two of which were items of litigation. He then advised that the Directors had received with their agenda package an annual report from his office. Mr. Woodruff said the Districts can be proud that they don't have a lot of litigation but he did emphasize that while the report seems very comprehensive, many of the claims were very old. A great number of them did not require the Districts to get too involved. Some were Stop Notices and were defended by contractors. As a rule, most of them are not really major nor significant. He added that if any Director wished additional information, to see him after the meeting or give him a call . #11 - Agreement with Dames & Moore The Director of Engineering reported that the Districts had previously adopted a Disaster Plan included in the Districts' Master Plan. Future actions will Include a design contract to tie down facilities such as electrical equipment, pumps, etc. Listed on the agenda that evening was an agreement for seismic studies relative to the structures themselves. Will start with a risk assessment. Many structures are new and would do well in an earthquake. Some structures are 30 years old and designed to different standards than today. We want to look at the structures and determine which ones we should fix and to what level we should fix them. Will try to categorize everything and will report back to the Board. They expressed concern re liquifaction, which is an increase in the water pressure in the soil and turns solid soil to quicksand. The Districts will go through a full earthquake training schedule and will have a simulated earthquake. He advised that the Selection Committee had negotiated a fee of $460,000 for this work. Joint Chairman Catlin commented that he had attended a meeting of WACO and saw a presentation of the problems in the Delta. We are way ahead. Said he was glad we were moving a positive direction. 813 - Supplement No. 1 to EIR re Job No. I-9 Tom Dawes reported that the project included in Supplement No. 1 was an interplant corridor between Plant No. 1 and the outfall booster station at Plant No. 2. An EIR was done on the Districts' Master Plan but there were three projects not included in the EIR--the interplant pipeline, sludge reclamation plant and water reclamation plant. This project includes a 4K-mile, 120-inch interplant pipe, digester gas line, fiber-optic communication cable and reclamation line. Estimated cost of this project is $32 million. The Director of Engineering advised that in August the Board authorized preparation of a Draft Supplement EIR. That was prepared and circulated and we have received comments from several agencies: SWRCB, Department of Transportation, County of Orange, Mesa Consolidated Water District and City of Tustin. He then showed slides of area where right-of-way will be required and noted that in July the Boards had authorized the Districts to take possession of oil wells in this area. 814 - Re Mitigated Negative Declaration re Wastewater Reclamation Plant The Director of Engineering recalled that the 1989 Master Plan included a recommendation regarding a water reclamation plant. It sited three areas. This site is none of those three but it is adjacent to one of them. We learned about it after the Master Plan was adopted. There is a wastewater plant to the north and a lumber and stone company on the site. In order to get a plant going, need to look for on-site pollution and in order to do borings, we have to negotiate with the owner. The Districts need to approve a Negative Declaration first. It has one mitigation measure before we can buy, we have to do a full EIR. This Mitigated Negative Declaration is so we can do investigations in order to buy the property and then will do an EIR. Silzel said we should specify ??? Tom indicated that we have made it clear that if there is any cleanup to be done, it is their responsibility, not ours. N15(b)(2) - Opposing Proposition 128 The General Counsel stated that the Directors had received a memo from him on Proposition 128 and noted that many of them were at the Executive Committee meeting when this was discussed. During the course of discussion, there were a great number of comments, suggestions, etc. He said he felt at the time that we got quite a good drift of what the Board members wanted but there were some things that were not quite clear. He advised that after the Executive Committee meeting, the General Manager and he spent considerable time looking at this. The purpose of his memorandum was to note some of the limitations of public agencies re expenditure of public monies re ballot measures. It is certainly permissible to take a position on this Proposition. Is okay to distribute resolution but if the document urges people to vote in the same manner as a public agency, we may not expend public monies for this. We want to prepare a notice that doesn't cross the lines and doesn't urge anyone to vote a certain way. It is not all without some risk. 2 REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BB ARD�tr DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION AND REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: k0 -1 O - 9 O AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 0 x x x x x x x x x x x xnn x\ x x x x x x x x x x x x x x NAME: (PLEASE PRINT) l=�narl�s I_ 1nef HOME ADDRESS: 2"1 So A MBER TREET �J' J1asa (CITY/ZIP DE TELEPHONE: - I$w REPRESENTING: 'Mae4Ve,rdA + Cl (SELF R NAME OF RGANIZAION F28A REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION AND REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: G <. '� u AGENDA ITEM NO. 5 C-' i i i 3 3 3 i i 3 4 4 i i 4 4 4 4 4 4 i t 4 4 4 4 4 i NAME: (PLEASE PRINT) �' 'h � 1'��c 1) 1 HOME ADDRESS: C'- NU BLR/STREET c nc ?tea c z clv (CITY/Lip DE TELEPHONE: -� -y� s 'J, - REPRESENTING: /'�/vi/4 (Ll7 'Jvr� SELF OR NAME OF RGANIZATI N 5�� F28A REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BB ARD-MEETING? AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE �..i SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION AND REMARKS NAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: P 0 AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (PLEASE PRINT) f})cc, c- ��C'e HOME ADDRESS: S `' L V� UMBER TREET i ✓1 c '-- r JGSG J ITY ZIP DE TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: I >,� /1'Ii� �SELF�AM R-gANY A F28A Director Green said he appreciated the staff's report but would like to go on record supporting Proposition 128 for a number of good features that it has. It does regulate pesticides and has the Department of Health participate in the decisions. It does establish certain criteria in other areas. May not be applicable here. Don't know if it has a strong impact on this District. Said he thought the good in the Proposition outweighs the concern. Director Wedaa asked what the suggested action was. Staff advised, to consider a resolution opposing the Proposition and distribute information, etc. Director Main asked if this would cost $50 million a year? If so, we should do all we can to defeat Prop. 128. Staff replied yes. The General Manager added that $50 million/year equals $1.4 billion over 30 years which is the cost difference between our current Master Plan program and going to full secondary treatment. Wedaa questioned if they voted for the motion, would they be voting yes or no on the Proposition. Also, what was their position relative to educating the public. It was then MOVED 8 SECONDED to approve Resolution No. 90-143 opposing Proposition 128. The General Counsel pointed out that the resolution did not contain any language relative to publishing it. Director Swan stated that the Districts are not going to be able to support water reclamation under Proposition 128. Will impact this plant and new plant. Will be really difficult in bringing water down from northern California. This area is going to have real serious problems. Wedaa asked, what are we going to do re public information program? The General Manager replied that the discussion the Executive Committee centered around was: (1) Forward a copy of the Staff Report and Resolution to all of the cities, County of Orange, special districts and governmental agencies in Orange Co. (2) Issue a press release (3) Newspaper ads (the most difficult one) Siefen commented that special districts' participation aren't supposed to be in the bill . Thought this should get changed re special districts. ROLL CALL VOTE taken on adoption of resolution. MOTION CARRIED. (Y-29, N-1, A-3) ROLL CALL VOTE taken on public information program. MOTION CARRIED. (SAME) A16(c) - ACTIONS TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION The Joint Chairman announced that it was appropriate for the Boards to consider Resolution No. 90-152 establishing General Manager's salary, as discussed and recommended in closed session. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried to adopt said resolution. The General Manager expressed his appreciation to the Board for their continued support. -3- #30 - DISTRICTS 6, 7 8 14 re Resolution of Necessity re Contract 14-1-1A (a) - Report of General Counsel The Assistant General Counsel , Clark Ide, addressed the Boards. He stated that �. at the last Board meeting, they adopted a resolution setting a hearing for that evening. He briefly reviewed the agenda to be followed. He noted that the property owners will have an opportunity to speak to Directors concerning their feelings on this. After the hearing, Directors will consider adoption of a resolution determining the necessity to acquire said property by eminent domain. (b)(5) - Oral presentation by staff The Districts' Director of Engineering reported that the Boards had previously taken actions relative to the Baker-Gisler Interceptor on several occasions. When completed, it will deliver water to this reclamation plant from Irvine and Costa Mesa. Will cost a total of $24 million. The Boards have approved Contract No. 14-1-1B from Brookhurst to Fairview. We had a cooperative project with Costa Mesa on that section. We are currently advertising the Contract 14-1-2, dual 42-inch force mains from Main Street Pump Station to approximately Bristol Street ($8 million). Bids will be received in two weeks. Right-of-way for this project between Fairview and the treatment plant is what is being discussed that evening. He referred to a slide map and pointed out the proposed alignment. He noted that the issues that night were acquisition of three easements from: (1) Magna Enterprises (2) Mesa Verde Country Club (3) Southern California Edison Company We want to avoid construction in Harbor Boulevard. The property owners would prefer that we build this in right-of-way of Harbor Boulevard. He further reviewed the proposed alignment and problems with other alignments considered. With regard to Magna Enterprises, they suggested we go through Harbor Blvd. or in local streets to the west rather than in their parking lot. The local streets are very narrow with four-plexes. We would take the whole street. We would much prefer to be in the parking lot. Director Sheridan asked how long we would be in the parking lot? Tom Dawes replied, two weeks. We would refurbish the parking lot and guarantee the results. With regard to the golf course, we would bring the sewer around the golf course property and bring it over to the westerly end and make a diagnol cut under Greenville-Banning Channel to get into two channels. That alignment was set to accommodate a future bridge over the Santa Ana River by the County of Orange. That bridge will be quite high and we have laid our sewer to accommodate that future bridge. He added that we would take out five trees on the golf course. The sewer will be higher in elevation than the golf course. We propose to replace trees. With regard to the SCEC site, it is between the Greenville-Banning Channel and Santa Ana River. The sewer will go up to the houses in the area. This is not a deep sewer. Won't be a great excavation. Edison is very concerned about encroaching on their right-of-way. The sewer crosses under the river and picks up some old sewers and combines them into one line. -4- REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN OCTOBER 10, 1990 1 ) UPCOMING MEETINGS A. FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 17TH, AT 5:30 P. M. B. JOINT WORKS SELECTION COMMITTEE - THE JOINT WORKS SELECTION COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 24TH, AT 4:30 P. M. C. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 24TH AT 5:30 P.M. (INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS TO ATTEND:) MARGARET M. ARNOLD AND WES BANNISTER - - OR - (ROLAND E. BIGONGER) - OR - (JOHN C. COX, JR. ) D. CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE - THE CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON THURSDAY, OCTOBER 25TH AT 5:30 P.M. E. BUILDING COMMITTEE - THE BUILDING COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 30TH AT 5:30 P. M. - END OF REPORT - /'\ �,.,�- � n4,qu,,,Y ���3/ya. '1 PUBLIC HEARING \o\la 4t0 CONTRACT NO. 14-1-1A Carol Herrera Harbor Mesa Trust: I'm the property manager for the property . where the Magna asement is. There have been several questions we have been asking and I'm not sure we really are getting an answer. I guess the first question is you are saying now you could do it in two weeks? The in and out of the construction in two weeks? Because we were given one week and we were given five months and I'm not sure which one it is. Chairman: I believe two weeks from pavement to pavement was the response given bye. C. Herrera: My question is the two weeks that would close down all of this parking ere and the parking on the other side, correct? Because it is going from one end to the other? TWO: We would be happy to do half of that, pave it and do the other half and pave it. It would take us a few days longer probably but that would be no big deal . C. Herrera: Let me ask this question, then. If it's two weeks then why can't Harbor �l evard be used? If that's the only down time. TMD: It's two weeks gust through your very short reach of parking lot. This black area is the easement we are talking about. If we were to go into Harbor Boulevard, we would be in this full reach through here a very long distance. It would take us a lot longer. We would probably have to do the work at night and it would be a horrible ,fob. C. Herrera: I don't know. We've gust got some real problems on knowing where we're to relocate the tenants. Where are we going to put them to park them? Because the other side of this parking lot, not this one. This one is where all the office building people are coming in but on the other side we have RB Furniture and the office building sharing a parking lot and there are easements between the office building and RB Furniture. So these cars would then be taking up parking where the RB Furniture is. And RB Furniture has their delivery trucks that maneuver in there daily and I'm not sure how we are going to get around that. Don Roth: Didn't you have the opportunity to talk with staff here about your problem. Is this the first time you've had to talk about it? C. Herrera: Well , no. We've talked back and forth with Tom Dawes and Ed ErTf—, minly Ed Elliot. Don Roth: Same questions? C. Herrera: Same questions. Don Roth: You havent' got the answers yet? C. Herrera: Well , we keep getting different answers. Don Roth: Well , how about the gentleman right here? Have you talked with him? C. Herrera: Right, I've talked to him. Don Roth: You get a different answer each time you talk to him? C. Herrera: My perfect example is the amount of time the construction time. Don Roth: It seems to me that _ the question because you could discuss at en�Fh—with staff \WW,� C. Herrera: Well , a part of our problem is the office building user is dead-set against this at all . He doesnt even want to really talk to anybody. He just says we don't want it, I'm going to lose my parking, etc. Don Roth: I'm not talking to him. I'm talking to you, young lady, about asking these questions and these answers. Tonight. So you get different answers each time you ask the questions? C. Herrera: Right. I guess I'm still not sure where everybody is going to park. Chairman: Tom, could you review again exactly what will happen if we use that area in terms of time? TMD: We have been going out there several times over the last year to look at parking and we just don't see this as a major problem. This is half of their parking lot. This was taken this morning and there is nobody in it. We've talked with Carol and their attorney and we have talked with the lessee and I think there has been a communication problem that nobody has ever sat down together and talked over these items. We are glad to do that and we can make this thing work with very little impact. We know how to do this. We have done it all over the County. So I believe we can solve their parking problems. We can schedule our work to work in phases in their parking lot. We can do any number of things. We have'nt had all the opportunity to talk over these things. Dir. Sheridan: It seems we could certainly parking for these people. It doesn't seem to be a b g problem other than the property owner. It would also seem quite beneficial , looking at the condition of that parking lot, if you know anything about pavement management it would be appropriate to have a new parking lot and certainly a new paved parking lot would be an improvement. TMD: First of all we have offered valet parking. We have offered off-site parking. We have done that to the tenant. The tenant simply does not want to discuss it with anybody and when we rebuild that parking lot it will be better than it is today in terms of structural strength of that thing. It will last a long time. We are happy to meet with the tenant and Ms. Herrera at any time. We can take care of those problems. The real issue here that I've seen over the last Ill years is the tenant who has a 50-year tenancy just doesn't want to talk. Chairman: Any more questions, Ms. Herrera? C. Herrera: You've already got the letter from Mr. Magna that his attorney subm�F? Chairman: It has been received and filed. C. Herrera: Okay. Again, a lot of the questions and things weren't gone over because the tenant, just to reconfirm, did not want the easement to go through here. And, so a lot of things were not discussed and I did bring up some of the questions because these are questions that I have because we are at the point now where it looks like this is going to go through whether we want it or not and these questions weren't raised by the tenant so I am trying to find out for myself of how things are going to work. -2- Chairman: Well , I hope you would continue to try to communicate to draw these two parties together because, as you see, the District is trying to cooperate and trying to find a good solution. C. Herrera: Okay. Let me ask one other question. Once the line goes in haw sral upf5ve, how much maintenance will it be once the line is in, the upkeep on the line? There will be periods of time where it will be opened up and the parking lot closed off while different maintenance is done. TMD: We are going to build manholes in the public right-of-way on each side of the parking lot property. We are not going to have a manhole within that parking lot. We have to go to the manholes periodically to clean the line. We are not going to enter the parking lot again to do that. As far as that sewer, It's a gravity sewer. It's a large diameter gravity sewer quite deep. Our gravity sewers don't give us much trouble. We just have an excellent history. This will be a pvc-coated concrete pipeline and would expect to not ever go in and dig that line up. You know that sometimes force mains have given trouble in the past, but these concrete sewer lines we haven't had them fail. C. Herrera: One last comment. We did just put this parking lot in last year. It is a brand new parking lot with a rock base, slurry and the restripe. Everything was done last year so it is a matter of opening up a brand new parking lot to do this and we have just had some problems with this parking lot with the high water table. So if it is opened up, it is going to need a lot of rock base and make sure it's compacted, etc. That is all I have. Chairman: Thank you, Ms. Herrera. We appreciate your testimony. Is Jim Kennedy from Southern California Edison in the audience and please come forward. J. Kennedy: Jim Kennedy of Southern California Edison. (Requested first slide of Edison line.) One thing to remember is the fact that all of this property that is in this catch here is not Edison property. Edison property starts about right here. One of our big concerns, and of course we have the same concerns that the sanitation district has, in meeting the new load that's created for your facilities. We serve the same customers so, therefore, we have need for future loads the same as you do. Unfortunately the particular line or right-of-way that you want to get into is only 75 feet wide. It is the most encumbered line with Edison facilities and we have in our transmission line facilities. On this line or this right-of-way are two 220,000 volt lines that came from San Onofre. These lines go to an Ellis substation which is adjacent to your property. In addition to those 220 volt lines, which are on your left, there are 6 66,000 volt circuits on the same corridor. This is all within 75 feet. The load that goes through or the customers that are served from this facility, this right-of-way is almost 60% of our customers that are in Orange County so you can see why we try to protect our property the best that we can. If we were forced to move our transmission line, our chances of finding another location to our Ellis substation are pretty remote. Now, we recognize that your needs and our needs are the same. We've got to protect ourselves and also look for the future. We have met with Mr. Dawes on numerous occasions and Tom is very good to work with. We have tried to look for solutions. We have tried even up until yesterday to see if there was another possibility of something that would be acceptable to Edison and also to the Sanitation District. I would like you to take a look at a couple of pictures that I have that also kind of show what Tom has on the slides (pictures passed around). Now one of the major concerns that we have that should the channel be required to be widened and we be forced to move the 220,000 volt line over, you can see there is very little -3- room to do that. Unfortunately, with the channel widening that is going on right now, it will come right up to the edge of our 220,000 volt line but it won't have to be moved. If it did have to be moved, though, the only alternative that we would have would be to put the 66,000 volt lines underground. This would mean that we would need the entire right-of-way to put `�. those lines underground if, in fact, we ever had to move. Your proposed project is really not compatible with out present or future needs. However, we are requesting a 30-day delay to give us an opportunity to see if there is any other acceptable locations that might be worked out. One thing that we have looked at is the possibility of maybe the Sanitation District lines be installed across the river in this bank on the other side of the channel. I would like to pass this picture around. Now we have suggested this to Tom. The thing that we really have to sit down and look at is if, in fact, there is any room on that side of the bank that might be acceptable for the new line. But our primary request is for a 30-day delay to see if we can work together because golly, we are in the same business, we serve the same customers and we certainly want to cooperate to the fullest that we can. We also want to find the best acceptable solution to the installation. I would be happy to respond to any questions that you may have. Chairman: Mr. Kennedy, have you discussed this before? Or how long have you known they were doing this? How much time between the time you knew it and now? SanionJ. Kennedy: I would imagine we probably had the first request from the District probably six months ago. It went through our normal process of a corporation to go to our corporate office to see if it was acceptable. It came back as no, it was not acceptable. At that time the Sanitation District came back with a proposed purchase price of the property and, of course, at that time our response was basically the same. I think serious negotiations really didn't start until probably a couple of weeks ago when it was very apparent that you had a need and we had a desire to protect our property. However, I reiterate the fact we want to cooperate to the fullest. Yet, we require at least a 30-day time frame to work with Tom to see if there is any other alternative. Dir. Roth: I'm not just clear and that is in the proposal that is outline-rby the Districts here is to reroute those lines? TWO: No. We will not reroute those lines. Dir. Roth: Mr. Kennedy's testimony is all hypothetical on moving lines and that' big problem. Is that correct? J. Kennedy: That's right. In other words we are looking for the future in case that should happen, where do we go. Dir. Roth: the proposal from the District doesn't require the moving of he�fn—e--$. Dir. Sheridan: Maybe it is a question of capacity is it not? You would like to have the capacity to look to the future. inst�J. Kenned : What we do is look for future. In other words, if we had to y, we got 6 66 circuits here and we had to install another one for future load, that would not be available. .r� -4- Dir. Sheridan: What is the possibility of that happening? What are your long-range projections for that particular area? J. Kennedy: As I indicated, probably 60% of Orange County load goes through that corridor. We certainly know it is not going to decrease because. To give you just an example of some of the circuits that are in there of the areas that it serves. Dir. Sheridan: What are your future projections for the next 10 years? You must have future projections. J. Kennedy: Well , let me give you an idea of what area we are going to serve so you can get an idea of the growth. These circuits serve Santa Ana, Newport, Costa Mesa and part of Orange County in the southern portion. So basically there is growth in those cities. The load is not going to go down. You know that. It is going to increase. Dir. Sheridan: Tom Dawes, what would be the benefit of waiting 30 days? Is this project time sensitive? TMD: Yes. I want to answer that in a couple of parts. 30 days is probably not crucial but it is time sensitive in that we are meeting the counties and the Corp of Engineers' schedule to get this work done. So it is very significant. If I may, I would like to respond to the issue about moving Edison poles. Edison is very concerned that some day they may have to move the poles. We do not require any movement of the pales. We will not harm or touch their poles. The County of Orange and the Corp of Engineers do not require that the poles be relocated for the Santa Ana River project. Edison has a concern that at some day in the future if that flood control channel is enlarged after the Corp builds it this time, that they would have to move and not have enough right-of-way. The County has tried to assure them that that is not an issue. But their concern that if they had to enlarge the new Corp of Engineer channel then they wouldn't have enough room. J. Kennedy: I think there were three poles, weren't there, Tom, that might have to be protected in place but not necessarily relocated. TMD: We will be digging next to three sets of those poles. We'll go by them, but, again, we are not very deep and we're some 20 feet away from them, from the center line of our sewer and we will protect them. Dir. Roth: I 'm inclined to support the 30-day continuance as requested because I think that once the Edison Company is able to work with Mr. Zahn and the County of Orange assures us they are not going to widen the channel and due to the fact that there is no request for removal of any of the lines, I see no reason why there can't be a good, satisfactory compromise because if we take the other alternative, which is eminent domain, we will be in litigation for the next year. So I think a 30-day continuance is certainly proper and certainly with many county employees Dir. Sheridan: Mr. Chairman, some reasonable solution would be worked out in that time it would b— a mum beneficial ? Chairman: Tom, would you like to respond to that? -5- TLW: Yes, I might. And Clark can also comment. But as far as the 30 days, Tom Dawes will advise you that we really need to start construction on this project in January. We will absolutely continue to negotiate with all three of these property owners as we have. The Edison Company was first advised of this in September, 1989. I don't like to correct you overbearingly, Jim, but the first letter of offer was September of 1989. The 30-day continuance just slows up. We've got some time problems in the court house to get these things going. Even if we get an order for immediate possession. But the simple initiating of proceedings doesn't stop the negotiations. We were meeting as recently as yesterday, Clark and Tom. And I'm sure they will continue to do so. We want, obviously, to negotiate and resolve it. They'll be receiving our settlement offers and I think they can go concurrently. Taking 30 days away from the litigation possibility calendar, however, does put a crimp on proceeding from that aspect alone. And it doesn't necessarily expedite any negotiating because we will be negotiating tomorrow and the next day and the next day immediately. Chairman: So what you are saying is negotiations and the legal proceedings can Fe concurrent. TLW: Absolutely. Dir. Swan: In your presentation, Tam, you were talking about that go under Me river and that those are going to have to be replaced in the not too distant future. And what you are doing is you are combining those all into one . If you did what Southern California Edison asked, we would be putting a new casing and siphon underneath the river way down river and then we would have to back up river and replace those that are already there somewhere else and bring them back down to the exact same Edison easement to connect to our cross in here. TMD: You have exactly described the situation. You are 100% correct. This is the right-of-way map. The yellow is the Edison right-of-way and as we mentioned, we are going to be in the Apollo right-of-way. We've already bought over most of this area. That's the green. When we get up by the houses, we cross into the Edison right-of-way and we are looking for a 20-foot easement from Edison to build this pipe. Again, our blue sewer is in this brown area that would be the Edison easement. We want to bring it to a common point where we can build one new siphon under the Santa Ana River into our plant. Then we're asking Edison for another easement to intercept sewers that serve Santa Ana and bring that down to that point and then have a common sewer. The alternatives that we have looked at and that Edison would prefer are to build down by Garfield and come in or build someplace else and come in. And we would have more siphons. Siphon is li million dollars, so combining is not a small issue. Coming across into this side into our plant is very prohibitive. You'll recall earlier in the evening we looked at that right-of-way and all of the pipes we have to deliver to Huntington Beach. They encumber that right-of-way and are in the way of bringing a gravity line to the north. Dir. Edgar: We have already approved going into that $32 million project and it seems to me that it is completely incompatible to go to the other side because they would have to TMD: That's absolutely correct. If we went to the other side we would come up in our Apollo easement as close as we could and then try to negotiate some other spot. Unless we can get this easement over this length, it means more than one siphon and that is the long and the short of it. -6- J. Kenned • One important fact is with a 220,000 volt circuit, and we have two, Ad th, 66,000-v01t circuit, the normal right-of-way required for that from Edison Company is 300 feet. We have compacted this all into 75 feet and that is the reason we are jealously protecting what we have left. So I would urge you to at least give us the 30 days to continue negotiations with Tom, to see if there might be an acceptable solution to both of us. Chairman: And that is your suggestion to the alternative that he was just describing? J. Kend : Well , Tom really didn't respond exactly how much of that bank acrossnea river is actually encumbered with lines. The statement is it is encumbered with lines but in comparison how much is encumbered? Is that a solution? That is, I think, something we have to look at. Chairman: Well , we'll see what happens. We appreciate your testimony. Any other questions for Mr. Kennedy at this point? Alright, Charles Parrot representing Mesa Verde Country Club. Would you give your name and address for the record. C. Parr t: Good evening, Mr. Chairman and members of the Boards. My name is Charles Parrot. I am a member of the Mesa Verde Country Club and its' attorney. Mesa Verde Country Club is strongly opposed to the Resolution of Necessity requested today. MVCC strongly feels that its country club is not necessary for the project and the design, as the plan imposes, is extremely injurious to the club. Tom, if you could please put up the photo. Though this photo doesn't really show the true extent of the intended take, the property as planned takes up about 25 feet of the fairway of the country club and an elevation of at least 6 feet. To the base of the fairway the elevation is planned to be 10 feet above the fairway. The result of the planned sewer pipe or box sewer is to essentially create a barrier on the northern boundary of the country club and blocking all of access along the country club to Gisler property except for a gate that s panned to be put in here. The project as planned and presented to the club also mentioned the installation of a large, above-ground structure. At no time has the club been informed what that structure is. The proposal will create, the facilities will constitute a continuing impact to the club, will effectively terminate forever our ability to design this hole in a way to effectively permit a championship hole for this club which is in a period of creating a championship course. We have had five or six holes that have been redesigned only the last year to create the championship facilities that we are hoping to have at that club and to encourage LPGA and, hopefully, some senior events at the club. The alternatives that have been presented by the District have been discussed with Mr. Dawes. We are fortunate to have at our club a number of engineers. We have lawyers, doctors. We even have a member of one of the Los Angeles sewer districts who has given me some guidance with respect to this project. Contrary to the statement of Mr. Dawes, it is my understanding that this project is doable underground. In fact, the presentation of the District up to within the last year was that this project would be in an underground pipeline. All offers to the club representatives would be an underground pipeline. The proposed alternative to the sewer line going through the country club has always been, among others, to go down Gisler. There is no reason, according to several members of the club who have different professional backgrounds that can lend some expertise at this hearing, why this project can't be designed to go underground, why it can't be designed to go underground on the street side of Gisler as they do in Los Angeles County or would in Los Angeles County. Mr. Dawes indicated in fairly strong language that they are going to build a bridge across this Gisler to Garfield. I don't think that's the case. -7- I know it's part of the plan of the County. However, the City of Costa Mesa in the April 18th hearing has deleted that connection with Garfield as part of its City plan. I feel there is an alternative, several alternatives. One is to go underground through the club if necessary but we hope not. Another alternative is to go on the street side. We have been somewhat restricted in comment because we had not received full comment from the District in connection with out request pertaining to the EIR, and that is another subject which is presently in litigation, but if we got full comment we may have more things to say at this hearing today. Thank you. (Tape turned over - lost some testimony) C. Parrot: It really limits our ability to design that hole and effectively in the language of golfers it will be a crummy hole. Chairman: The other question to you is have you brought these subjects up to and talked with them individually before this time or are these new to him? C. Parrot: No, I have talked to the right-of-way agent, I have talked to Mr. Dawes and I have certainly talked to Counsel. Chairman: Tom, would you want to respond to those? TMD: Yes. There are several issues there so I will try to hit them all . The issue about the elevation, I reported to you earlier that we had to build a siphon and I think that this gentleman is referring to the siphon as the underground part. Why don't we extend that underground part longer, build a longer siphon? As the siphon now is to get under the future bridge and to get the abutment of the bridge and to get under the Greenbelt/Banning Channel , it is 600 feet long. A siphon is 66-inch pipe. We don't like longer siphons. Our maintenance people feel very strongly about the length of the siphon. This is something that they have to get a tire, a type of a donut up there and pull it through the siphon to drag out the sand and they don't like longer siphons. Now, I have talked to Chuck Carrey, the LACSD General Manager and Chief Engineer. They do build longer siphons in LA. We have never built a siphon as long as they have built in LA. I asked him how he cleans them. He told me paint blank they don't. We're not LA and we don't design like LA. It is simply an issue that we will not recommend to you such a siphon, such a long siphon. The second thing is the discussions with the golf course. They have been ongoing for a 114 years. In fact, the golf course approved the whole plan about a year ago. They thought it was a goad plan when we showed them how we are going to landscape, build a golf cart on top. Subsequently, and I think this gentleman can comment much better on it, they let the manager go who approved it and I guess that's a sign that maybe they didn't like it. They have a new board of directors. The new board of directors has taken a different position than the old board of directors. Third, this pipe on their golf course, in order to keep that profile as low as possible, it is a six foot high box partially buried in the ground and partially buried above the ground. At its highest point it is about four feet above that existing grade about where that first palm tree is and there is no question that that is going to be a burden but that's not 10 feet, that's 4 feet. There is no structure. We have never shown you a structure at the end where the box terminates and the siphon starts down deeply, there will simply be some plates, some diamond aluminum plates on the top that we can remove at that point in order to insert the cleaning equipment for the siphon. So there isn't any giant structure. The other issue I would like to comment on are alignments. We have looked long and hard at all kinds of alignments because we recognize that this is a tough issue. We have -8- studied for both the golf course and for Edison alignments where we could go through city streets in Costa Mesa. They were so disruptive to get into these other streets that we just found it unacceptable to propose that to you. It was more expensive, but more than that it was very disruptive to these streets. As far as building it in Gisler, that causes tremendous problems to Gisler. Because of that hydraulic gradeline, we would have to raise Gisler about four feet. That hits every back yard. You can just see how that starts multiplying. We have to bring the street up, the water lines, the sewer lines in the street. And we have to redesign all of these entrance streets to this track. As far as the proposed bridge over the Santa Ana River, we would not design a structure and bring it to you that didn't meet the criteria for this bridge. We can't predict if it is going to be built or if it is not going to be built. But we are not going to design a structure and recommend it to you that in three years or five years or ten years has to be relocated. So we have kept that structure in mind. The County has it on their master plan of bridges, their master plan of arterial highways, and at least the County thinks they are going to build it. They just did the first steps last year. They approved a project report on that bridge. It would be a high bridge connecting Garfield to Gisler and it would have a high abutment. The abutment will actually be so high, that this street won't be able to access Gisler. They are going to build a cut de sac and take out a couple of homes as I understand it. That's a big fill and if we had built in the street, we would have to deal with that fill . Again, it would require a much longer siphon for us. Mr. Chairman, I hope I responded to all of your.... Chairman: Yes. The question that I have is how much time for full comment did they have on this? TMD: I would estimate that they have been working on this for a couple of years with us. They gave us comments on the Draft EIR in this last year. We met with their staff I believe in the Fall of 89, so it's more like a year and a-half, possibly two years. Chairman: Mr. Parrot, would you like to respond to that? C. Parrot: Yes I would. With respect to the comments there was meetings in the Fall of 89. There was an offer made based on an underground structure. There was certainly a positive attitude at that point in time. When the designs were given to the club that showed an above-ground structure and gave the elevation which, again, to the base of the fairway there is an elevation slope up four feet. With a structure up here we are talking an elevation of six feet. At that point in time we did receive an EIR, asked for comments. The comments were given to us after the EIR was finally approved. We've had discussions with attorneys regarding things like the above-ground structure which is described in the project as this item that Mr. Dawes now tells us is a couple of plates. It's described in the project designated in the EIR as a large, above-ground structure. If that's a couple of plates, why didn't he tell us? With respect to the future bridge, I don't know if it's going in. I don't know if Mr. Dawes knows it's going in. There is no reason why this district can't plan or coordinate this pipe to work with that future bridge. With respect to the discussions that Mr. Dawes had with Mr. Carrey, they were sometime ago and I have had recent discussions with council and invited council to ask Mr. Dawes to talk with Mr. Carrey further on the alternative of making, designing the pipeline along Gisler or under Gisler. Apparently those discussions haven't taken place. All I know is they' re designing similar project is Los Angeles County. They are going underground. They are not breaking through into golf courses, homes, stores. With respect to maintenance it is not a problem in LA, or if it is I think it would be designed around. I don't think there has been enough discussion by this district so that it can make any conclusion that the alternative going down Gisler isn't certainly as good and certainly it would not be near as injurious as to the Mesa Verde Country Club. -9- Chairman: One comment. The staff has advised our Directors that notwithstanding what they would do in Los Angeles engineering-wise, they would not recommend a siphon of that length. So here we have an engineering difference. But it seems to me the District is one of much more conservative maintenance viewpoint. C. Parrot: I understand that. doesn't necessarily mean that it is correct from an engineering view and that there isn't a middle ground between the conservatives and maybe the liberal that would work under these circumstances not to impose the burdens it will have on the club as well as the surrounding community. Chairman: Thank you. Questions? Dir. Swan: If there is something that happens to this pipe and it shuts down, you are shutting down all of Costa Mesa, parts of Santa Ana, Irvine and Tustin. Now if that's more or less important than the golfing of your club, I would like to know about that. C. Parrot: Well , I think that is an alarmist comment as there is always a post on to say, but what if this fails? I hope that there is a conservative middle ground that can be reached to solve your extreme probelm so that it won't happen. But it doesn't have to happen, at least according to professionals at the club and to a member, I would feel this District should respect, in Los Angeles District, sanitation district. He's not worried about these items. I understand that Orange County is more conservative and I'm glad they are. But, I'm not, if Chuck Carrey is telling me that he's not going to have a problem with it, then I believe Chuck Carrey. Chairman: Who is Chuck Carrey, sir? C. Parrot: Mr. Dawes, maybe you could give his title? TMD: Chuck Carrey is the Chief Engineer of the LA County Sanitation Districts Ind the General Manager. C. Ida: Mr. Chairman, I would like to comment on one thing. I believe that maLA County has gone through some golf courses. I think Mr. Carrey provided you with an example of an appraisal on a golf course they had gone through. Isn't that true, Mr. Dawes? TMD: Yes. I 've talked with Mr. Carrey about this as recently as three or four weeks ago and he is not concerned about extending a siphon as Mr. Parrot has mentioned. He also didn't see any problem about going on a golf course site which I didn't care to mention that because it's ,just what he told me. He do t see a problem either way. Dir. Wahner: You are not hurting fairway or t-box. You are out of the fairway. hamper the t-box at this end? You wouldn't harm the green at this end ec� you'd be pulling away from . There is a flat plateau which drops off and that's where your fairway star F. Dir. Sheridan: I can certainly understand going through a parking lot. However, golf courses and golfers, being what they are, . Has golf course contractor or landscape architect golf cosign. how this particular can be measured would not impair t e design of the hole Is there an alternative for moving it five feet or six feet in one direction that a golf course designer might be designing that hole. -10- C. Parrot: We have retained a golf course architect to look at that. As I TF-dicae3 we have redesigned many holes to put them up to a very high standard. Mr. Dawes will make a presentation, these are the design that was forwarded by Boyle Engineers. I wish they were golfers but their proposal is unworkable. The design that would have to be made if this course would be saddled with this six foot barrier on top of a four foot slope would be having to go dog-legged, � what is called a dog-leg right, and then into the hole like this. This will affect other holes here where you are going to have balls sprayed in and is not a desirable hole alternative but it is a suggestion that we have looked at. Dir. Sheridan: Is there an alternate optimum situation n gore design that would make this particular problem less ? C. Parrot: I think the real problem is the elevation of the planned sewer s r� through the course. The elevation as required, at least under the conservative use of Mr. Dawes, puts the course, elevates the course at least six feet from the four-foot slope that is presently in place. And because we've got a slope that will effectively create a fairway that is slanted and unplayable, it just makes it real tough on Dir. Sheridan: There is no way that one could entire landscape with and grading to make it more palatable, Mr. Dawes? TMD: I really don't know enough about golf courses to answer. Dir. Sheridan: I think if we are tearing them up we need to TMD: I'm not a golfer and I really know that they are very concerned about this. The location of the sewer in relation with the trees was chosen with on the golf course about a year and a-half ago. They were very concerned about losing the Cypress . So the sewer was put into the golf course a little bit more to avoid taking those trees. After the sewer moved closer to the road on either side of those trees, we would kill the trees. If we put it on the road side of the trees, we would kill them. If we put them on the golf course side of the trees we would kill them. The sewer could be located very correctly towards Gisler some distance. The Sanitation District has no opinion on that. We would build it anywhere in that area that the golf course would Dir. Sheridan: If in fact we could get out of that line design a crummy hole could not that be some way to this problem with an appropriate ? C. Parrot: As I understand, the suggestion would be to move the sewer line closer to the line of the present trees toward Gisler. Our problem is this is the playability of this area so that would be an alternative which certainly is a better one than the one that would place the sewer line through . The important thing about the trees, if I may mention, we've got a subdivision here that for both purposes there is a need for privacy and protection. The trees also serve as a sound barrier with the San Diego freeway only 3 or 4 blocks away. Those trees are valuable trees to the course and we would want to insure that they would remain to serve those purposes. Dir. Sheridan: It would seem to me that it might be meaningful to v -11- TMD: Sanitation Districts' position from day one has been we would do anything tTiat we could to minimize this on the golf course. And that is still the position of this staff. The issues as to elevations and location in Gisler are issues that we are recommending against going into Gisler but anywhere else we simply would do whatever you suggest in that area. Dir. Mahoney: Could I ask a question? Haw wide is the fairway where those trees are? C. Parrot: I really cannot comment. I don't know. I can ..... Dir. Mahoney: Well , you can certainly give me a guesstimate. Is it as wide as this room. Is it wider than the room? Is it the width of a football field? C. Parrot: The distance of the fairway from here to the tree line over here? Dir. Mahoney: No, from the palm tree over, what is the width? C. Parrot: I would say the width drops off about four feet, slopes down about 6 to 7 feet beyond the palm tree, about _ foot and that is where the fairway starts. Dir. Mahoney: So basically the fairway is lower than this elevation right here? TMD: That is correct. C. Parrot: The fairway starts a gentle slope here and is kind of swelling right erg e. would estimate, and this is a tough estimate, that the fairway from this tree to the other trees is maybe 2 times the width of this room or a little bit more. Dir. Mahoney: Well , you know I play. I'm a golfer, all right. And I've got to tell you I've got a problem with the problem that you folks have. I've played golf courses that are very tight. I've played golf courses, Industry Hills being one, that you talk about rough and problems on a fairway, and a very narrow fairway. As far as I'm concerned I don't see the problem here with a little bit of rough. And looking at the drawings that we have I don't know why we can't meld in, if that's possibly acceptable to you folks, a little bit better so that you have a. . . I notice on this it comes to kind of a sharp point and drops. I don't know why we can't have some kind of a meld a little better on your fairway so you, you know today they don't build golf courses flat. I mean, the character of a golf course is you get a little bit of roll on, you know, a little angulation here and there. I just don't think. . . C. Parrot: I understand your comments and if I could speak to them for a second. As you are a golfer you must appreciate the culture that each golf course has and the integrity of the golf course. Holes are not designed so that you have a Disneyland here and a sloping up and down course hole on the next hole. This course is designed in a traditional style. The alternative that you are suggesting, sir, would be result in basically having a whole different culture be put into this one hole and the rest of the holes being of a different source. That's not what the Mesa Verde Country Club wants and that's not what It should have. If there are alternatives that would better, that would serve both the club and the Districts. One other comment, with respect to your comment on the fairway. If this sewer pipe would be put in, I 'm about 6 feet tall , a little more, you' re talking about a 10 foot elevation. `....� -12- Dir. Mahoney: This thing keeps growing. I thought we started out one way and now its 10 feet. C. Parrot: From the fairway. From the fairway we are talking about a 10 foot elevation to the fairway. You don't play golf, maybe Industry Hills, but not at Mesa Verde. You don't play on that kind of slope on a side hill line. Dir. Cox: I think we have heard a lot of testimony tonight between the two parties involved. I don't think it's our job to sit here and . I think that this agency has gone through a lot of trouble in the last 12, 16, 18 months to try to work out the arrangements. And now we are down to the wire where we have to create some action here and apparently we got their attention. I think it is unfortunate that we have a new board of directors at the country club that don't agree with the design that the other board . I think we have demonstrated a repoire and a committee with ability to cooperate in all areas to try and get the job done. There is nothing sacred about that particular design and you've got to do it. I think, as Tom mentioned, we are up against a deadline here, a timing situation. Personally I propose that and make a recommendation that the staff continue to work with all three parties to solve the issues that have to do with design have to do with policy. To work it out like it is suggested here and at the same time let Tom Woodruff continue to work on the legal issues because we have a time deadline. We just can't talk about this for another 18 months. We have to resolve it in the next 30 days and so that is my motion. C. Parrot: May Ijust...correct. Two things Mr. Cox said. Chairman: I 'll give you one more response and then I think we are going to close. C. Parrot: That's all I want. The board of Mesa Verde never approved this project. Secondly, this project has totally changed from the first discussions that Mesa Verde had. This was presented as a below ground structure. Chairman: All right. At this particular point I'm going to close the public hearing. I think we have heard enough discussion on this. I appreciate your frank discussion and I'm going to turn it back over to the Directors for your comment. Dir. Edgar: I'm going to make the motion to approve 90-148 with all the probable activity be taken to with I think the message has to be clear that it is-! necessity for moving sewage in Tustin, Irvine and Costa Mesa, it is the responsibility of every one sitting here So we are going to give our legal peoplke to move and at the same time if there is any possible accommodations that can be made with the issue of parking lot more palatable, the Edison more palatable, the golf course more palatable, we are anxious to do that but not to the detriment of moving forth at this time. Chairman: We have a motion and a second on Resolution 90-148 to proceed as recommended by staff. Is there any further discussion? Dir. Sheridan: I will support the motion as it is made with one of the golf course that staff make every attempt to higher a profess o nal golf course landscape architect so that the sensitivities of each particular element "Chairman: I believe that was implicit in the motion and the second by Director Edgar, here. Any further discussion? Dir. Swan: Call for the question. -13- COUNTY SANITATION `-' DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 3, 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON OCTOBER 10, 1990 4 E PNITATIG , gym.° GRgNGE 1CAVti` ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held an October to, 1990, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts- Administrative Offices. Fallowing the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS `�.►� DISTRICT NO. 1: x James A. Wahner, Chai man Orme Crank x Charles E. Puckett, Chai man pro two —Richard B. Edgar xban Griset Dan Young =Roger Stanton ---Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 2: a Iry Pickler, Chairman Fred Hunter x James Neal, Chairman pro tan George Scott Roland E. Bigonger 7—Henry W. Medan =A.B. -Buck- Catlin Chris Herby -=Dan Griset _Dan Young =William 0. Mahoney ' Beth Graham =Robert H. Main —Norman Culver Currey Nelson 7—Wayne Wedin =Arthur G. Newton —Norman Z. Eckenrode =Wayne Silzel —Harold Saldarini _ =Don E. Smith Fred Barrera =Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 3: x Richard Polls, Chai man _Eva G. Miner x J.R. -Bob- Siefen, Chai man pro tan Dewey Wiles =Edward L. Allen —David J. Shower a Margaret M. Arnold —Cecilia L. Age dWes Bannister 7--Peter Green =A.B. -Buck- Catlin _Chris Herby =Nomah Culver Robert H. Main =Beth Graham William 0. Mahoney =Don R. Griffin _Donna L. Chessen =Dan Griset Dan Young = _ _James Neal George Scott Carrey Nelson =_Wayne Wedin a Iry Pickler Fred Hunter =Roger Stanton —_Don R. Roth =Charles Sylvia _Robert Wahlstrom =Edna Wilson Frank Laszlo DISTRICT MO. 5: Evelyn Hart, Chairman x Ruthelyn Plummer =Phil Sansone, Chairman pro tan =John C. Cox, Jr. z Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 6: x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chai man _Evelyn Hart x James A. Wahner, Chairman pro tan James M. Ferryman =Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 7: x Don E. Smith, Chairman Fred Barrera = _ Richard Edgar, Chai pro tem _Charles E. Puckett =John C. Cox, Jr. Ruthelyn Plummer_ =Dan Griset —RogerDan Young =Don R. Rath Stanton 7—Sally Anne Sheridan Barry Hammond -7--James A. Wahner _Harry Green DISTRICT NO. 11: Grace Winchell, Chai man x Peter Green a Tom Mays, Chairman pro in Jim Silva z Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 13: x Henry W. Medea, Chairman Roland E. Bigonger x Wayne Media, Chai man pro too —Carrey Nelson a.Iry Pickler —Fred Hunter x Don R. Rath _Roger Stanton =Dan E. Smith Fred Barrera DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chat man Darryl Miller =Sally Anne Sheridan, Chairman pro tem _—Barry Hammond =Leslie A. Pontious Richard B. Edgar �i x Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton =Don E. Smith Fred Barrera -2- 10/10/90 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita J. Brown, Board Secretary, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Corinne Clawson, Penny Kyle, Ed Hodges, John Linder, Charles Nichols, Jack Vincent, Chuck Winsor, Patti Gorczyca, Gary Hasenstab, Irwin Haydock, Steve Hovey, Jo Klak, Mark Esquer, Chloe Dao OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel , Clark Ide, Jim Kennedy, Bill Dobberpuhl , Wayne Milner, Donna Rovero, John Masek, Charles W. Parret, Allan Porush, Udarp Patil , Carol ` Herrera, Charles Wilson, Duane Jensen, Larry H. Allsup, Dennis Wood, Mary Lee, Ron Eguchi , Jan Decker, Mark Briggs, Arshud Mahmood, Greg Salzano, Tom Lane, Tom Richardson x x x x x x x x x x x x x ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Catlin reported that Report of the Joint Chairman the Fiscal Policy Committee was scheduled to meet on Wednesday, October 17th, at 5:30 p.m. He also noted that a Joint Works Selection Committee was scheduled to meet on Wednesday, October 24th, at 4:30 p.m. The Joint Chairman then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, October 24th, at 5:30 p.m. , and invited Director John C. Cox, Jr. to attend and participate in the discussions. Chairman Catlin also reported that the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee was scheduled to meet on Thursday, October 25th, at 5:30 p.m. Mr. Catlin added that the Building Committee was scheduled to meet on Tuesday, October 30th, at 5:30 p.m. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager commented on a Report of the General Manager cotton tote bag included in the Directors' folders from Pima Gro Systems, a firm currently contracting with the Districts for removal and disposal of the Districts' sludge. He noted that Pima Gro applies the sludge directly to agricultural land used for growing crops such as cotton. ' Mr. Sylvester also called the Directors' attention to a letter he wrote to "Earth Alertl ", an environmental organization, in response to an inaccurate article published in their Spring 1990 Bulletin containing rather blatant misrepresentations regarding the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County wastewater management program. -3- 10/10/90 ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel announced that Report of the General Counsellater in the meeting the Boards would be adjourning to a closed session relative to personnel matters and matters of litigation at which time he would report further on certain items. Mr. Woodruff then reviewed his Annual Report to the Boards of Directors relative to the status of pending litigation. He noted that many of the claims and cases listed in the report are several years old, and many were defended by various construction contractors. Consequently, the Districts were not required to become too involved in these claims. He commented that, historically, the Districts have experienced a very nominal amount of litigation, and, in fact, this low frequency is much better than average for public agencies. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 12, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 12, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 12, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 12, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 12, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 12, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 12, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 12, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. `r -4- iuliu/vu DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or Approval of minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 12, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ra ification of payment of Join _ and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 9/12/90 9/26/90 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 591,412.70 $1,209,348.62 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 279,608.30 521,753.37 Joint Working Capital Fund - 128,898.79 228,322.97 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 100,224.16 20,230.52 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 2,891.06 970.53 DISTRICT N0. Z - 10,593.50 481,683.16 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 13,705.35 29,449.66 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 41,354.39 19,056.60 DISTRICT NO. 6 - -0- 784.75 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 13,839.30 41,065.66 DIDI TRI�1 - 746.83 11,048.64 DISTRICT NO. 13 - -0- 123.12 DISTRICT­N0. 14 - 892.37 3,384.80 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 8 6 JOINT - 20.27 18,388.62 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 8 7 JOINT - 3,359.07 -0- DISTRICTS NOS. 7 8 14 JOI T - 9.03 4 543.65 1,187,555.12 2,5 0,154.E ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase of Microcomputer Hardware, Software and Associated That the bid tabulation and Peripherals, Specification recommendation re award of purchase No. E-191, to various firms order contracts for Purchase of Microcomputer Hardware, Software and Associated Peripherals, Specification No. E-191, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase order contracts for 23 systems be, and are hereby, awarded to the following vendors, for a total amount not to exceed $82,515.35 plus sales tax: Category Vendor Amount Hardware Action Software $ 5,241.00 _ Software CoastTech Computer 2,523.00 Hdwr/Sftwr Computer Bay 7,823.00 Hdwr/Sftwr Inacomp Computer Centers 8,694.00 Hdwr/Sftwr Kalleen's Computer Products, Inc. 5,440.00 Hdwr/Sftwr LB 8 Associates 5,898.35 Hdwr/Sftwr Microage - Fountain Valley 41,476.00 Hdwr/Sftwr Microage Computer Center 5,420.00 (Santa Ana) 82,515.35 -5- 10/10/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Blueprinting, Photocopying and Related Services S ecification That the bid tabulation and No. -64-r Revisea) , to Banana recommendation re award of purchase Blueprint, Inc. order contract for Blueprinting, Photocopying and Related Services, Specification No. S-046 (Revised) , be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, ' FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase order contract be, and is hereby, awarded to Banana Blueprint, Inc. for a one-year period beginning October 15, 1990, for a gross annual amount not to exceed $118,060.56 plus sales tax, with provision for four one-year extensions. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: _ Approving han a Order No. 2 to Purchase Order NO. J4bVi issuea to That staff be, and is hereby, Office Pavilion Interior Resources authorized to issue Change Order re Job No. J-7-5 No. 2 to Purchase Order NO. 34691 issued to Office Pavilion/Interior Resources for Purchase and Installation of Administration Building Interior Office Partitioning Systems and Furnishings, Job No. J-7-5, increasing the total authorized amount from $966,855.53 plus sales tax to an amount not to exceed $1,005,427.60 plus sales tax, for added storage and transport costs re interior office partitioning systems and furnishings pending completion of new Districts' facilities. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 tO the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 1 to the plans Job No. J-19-2 and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-19-2, authorizing an addition of $30,183.44 to the contract with Brinderson Corporation for five items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specificationsfor That Change Order No. 2 to the plans Job No. J-24 and specifications for Installation of Replacement Influent Meters, Job -No. J-24, authorizing a net addition of $3,503.44 to the contract with P. R. Burke Industrial Corporation for four items of additional work or deletions, and granting a time extension of 20 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Job No. J- 4 as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-137, accepting Installation of Replacement Influent Meters, Job No. J-24, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. �s� -6- 10/10/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Chan a Order No. 6 to the tans and seecilTications for That Change Order No. 6 to the plans Job No. PI-33 and specifications for Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PI-33, authorizing an �,✓ addition of $23,000.00 to the contract with Gust K. Newberg Construction Company for one item of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Chan a Order No. 3 to the plans and seecif cations for That Change Order No. 3 to the plans Job No. PI- 4-1 and specifications for Gas Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-1, authorizing a net addition of $9,644.00 to the contract with Ziebarth & Alper for three items of additional work or deletions, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Chan a Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 5 to the plans Job No. P1-34-2 and specifications for Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-2, authorizing an addition of $32,309.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. for one item of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Author zin t e elec on omni tee to negotiate Addendum o. 1 to he That the Selection Committee be, and Professional 5ervices reemen is hereby, authorized to negotiate o wi h n Caro to En lneers re Addendum No. 1 to the Professional design of JOD Nos. PS- and P -4 Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design and construction services, preparation of operations and maintenance manuals, and training services re Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36, and Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42, to provide for additional design services necessary to replace and realign existing 78-inch ocean outfall and modify existing scum collection system. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: PA rov n Professions Services greement with J. Horvath & That the Selection Cortmittee Associates for specialized certification of the final construe on mama ement and negotiated fee relative to the ns ectt0n services re various Professional Services Agreement with master- anned construction J. T. Horvath 8 Associates for projects specialized construction management and inspection services re various master-planned construction projects, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, -7- �,/ 10/10/90 FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-139, approving said agreement with J. T. Horvath & Associates for said services, on an as-needed basis, for a two-year period beginning October 11, 1990, at the following hourly rates, plus direct expenses at cost: Agreement Period Hourly Rate 10/11/90 - 10/10/91 $ 35.00 10/11/91 - 10/10/92 37.50 Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Professional Services Agreement with K. P. Lindstrom, That the Selection Committee Inc. for environmental consulting certification of the final services negotiated fee relative to the Professional Services Agreement with K. P. Lindstrom, Inc. for environmental consulting services to assist staff on NPOES Permit activities; regulatory and legislative liaison activities; and for technical support for sludge management, air quality, reclamation and conservation issues and in connection with CEQA compliance for Master Plan projects, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-140, approving said agreement with K. P. Lindstrom, Inc. for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor including overhead and profit plus direct expenses and subconsultant fees, for a total amount not to exceed $164,500.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate a Professional That the Selection Committee be, and .Services Agreement with Ecosystems is hereby, authorized to negotiate a Engineering & Analyses for Professional Services Agreement with ecological consulting and Ecosystems Engineering & Analyses statistical data analyses services for ecological consulting and statistical data analyses services. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison Company That the Boards of Directors hereby for right-of-way required to adopt Resolution No. 90-141, . operate and maintain electrical approving and authorizing execution equipment rovidin electrical of a Grant of Easement to Southern power to Job Nos. J-17 and J-2 -1 California Edison Company for right-of-way required to operate and maintain Southern California Edison's equipment which will provide electrical power to the new Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17, now under construction and the new Control Center/Operations and Maintenance Building, Job No. J-23-1, now under design. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. 10/10/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving agreement WithCity of New ort Beach ranting an easement That the Boards of Directors hereby to theCity re City water line adapt Resolution No. 90-142, through Treatment Plant No. 2 approving and authorizing execution of an agreement with the City of Newport Beach granting an easement to the City required in connection with construction of and access to a 30-inch City water line through Treatment Plant No. 2 from the Santa Ana River property line to Brookhurst Street, in exchange for a Quitclaim Deed from the City to the Districts, quitclaiming the City's interest in a previous water line easement which also crosses Plant No. 2. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Professional Services _ A reement with Dames 2, Moore to conduct iesmicToy o Element of Job Nos. P1- -3 and P2-43- Verbal staff report- The Director of Engineering briefly reviewed the scope of work to be included in the proposed seismic study. He noted that the consultant would investigate the Districts' existing structures and provide recommendations for rehabilitation based on economic and risk management criteria to reduce potential damage to the treatment plant and pipeline facilities in the event of an earthquake. He also advised that a full earthquake preparedness training program would be Included in this proposed contract. Mr. Dawes noted that the Selection Committee had negotiated a fee for the studies in the amount of $460,000.00 and that staff concurred with their recommendation. The Joint Chairman referred to problems encountered in other areas within the state and expressed his support of the Districts' plan to move ahead in a positive direction to protect the treatment plants and prepare for such an emergency. Approving Professional Services Moved, seconded and duly carried: Agreement That the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee relative to the Professional Services Agreement with Dames 8 Moore to conduct Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-3, and Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-2, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adapt Resolution No. 90-138, approving said agreement with Dames 8 Moore for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct _ expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $460,000.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. g- 10/10/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve writ en report of tnI onservation That the written report of the Reclamation and Reuse Conmi ee Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee's meeting on September 27, �...� 1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Amendment No. 1 to e Agreement for Removal and Disposal/ That Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement Reuse oP is rtcts' Residua I Sow for Removal and Disposal/Reuse of w t Pima Gro systems, Inc. Districts' Residual Solids with Pima Gro Systems, Inc. , providing for an increase in volume and a reduction in cost from $33.50 per wet ton to $28.75 per wet ton, be, and is hereby, approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute said Amendment in form approved by the General Counsel . ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Amendment No. 4 to he A reement for Remova rock e g That Amendment No. 4 to the Agreement and Disposal of Sewage Solids with for Removal , Processing and Disposal Recyc, Inc. of Sewage Solids with Recyc, Inc. , providing for a change in the method of computing the cost for said services to "dollars per wet ton of solids residuals removed", and establishing said cost at $23.00 per wet ton, be, and is hereby, approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute said Amendment in form approved by the General Counsel . ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Supplement No. 1 to Program EIR for Collection Treatment and Disposal Ficilities Master Plan re Inter lant Pi eline and Ut ty Corr dor, Job No. I-9 Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering reported that in 1989 the Boards approved the updated Master Plan which provided for facilities necessary to meet flow increases and regulatory discharge requirements for the next 30 years. Also approved was an Environmental Impact Report which addressed most of the master-planned projects. However, three projects included in that document were only able to be addressed in a general manner and were designated as needing further review and additional CEQA documentation when the project was ready to begin the design phase. The Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9, is one of those projects. The project includes a new 120-inch sewer outfall that will deliver treated effluent from Plant No. 1 to the ocean outfall booster stations at Plant No. 2. Also included is utility piping and communication cables. The cost of the project is estimated at $32 million. `...' -10- 10/10/90 Mr. Dawes then reviewed the actions taken thus far with regard to CEQA requirements. He advised that comments on the Draft Supplement No. 1 had been received from the State Water Resources Control Board, the State of California Department of Transportation, County of Orange, Mesa Consolidated Water District and the City of Tustin. These comments have been addressed in the Final Supplement. Public Hearing The Joint Chairman announced that this was the time and place fixed by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 for a public hearing on Draft Supplement No. 1 to Program EIR for Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan re Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9. Open Public Hearing The Chairman declared the hearing open at 7:55 p.m. Receive and file written comments Moved, seconded and duly re Draft upplement No. 1 to EIR carried: That the written comments relative to Draft Supplement No. 1 to EIR for Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan re Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. Close hearing There being no oral public comments, the Chairman declared the hearing closed at 7:56 p.m. Directing consultant to address Moved, seconded and duly carried: written comments received on Draft Supplement No. 1 to EIR and prepare That the consultant be, and is Final Supplement No. 1 after close hereby, directed to address any of the comment eriod on written or oral comments received ctober 10, 199 on the Draft Supplement No. 1 to said EIR and to prepare the Final Supplement No. 1 to Program Environmental Impact Report for Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan re Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9, after the close of public comment period on October 10, 1990. ALL DISTRICTS _ Actions re Mitigated Negative Declaration re Purchase of a Site for a Wastewater Reclamation Plant in the City of Fullerton Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering recalled that the 1989 Master Plan and Program Environmental Impact Report included a "Potential Water Reclamation Plants Reconnaissance Report". It reviewed 18 sites and found three sites to be the most promising--Crescent Basin, Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station and the Anaheim Forebay. The purpose of the reclamation plants would be the production of water almost comparable in quality to potable water systems for use in supplying 10/10/90 certain industrial needs, landscape irrigation, and groundwater recharge. Mr. Dawes pointed out that the 5-3/4 acre parcel in the City of Fullerton currently being considered is easterly of the Crescent Basin site and is not one of the 18 parcels originally identified as it became potentially available after the Master Plan was completed. However, it is now the top-rated site. The Executive Committee and the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee have reviewed proposals for the purchase of this site. Staff reported that in order to prepare a purchase agreement for consideration by the Directors, various onsite and offsite studies must be conducted, including a geotechnical analysis with emphasis on - possible underground contamination. Mr. Dawes advised that Waste Water Disposal Company (owners of the site) and the members of the Executive Committee and Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee all agree that a prepurchase agreement, outlining the conditions of sale, including price, should be entered into before additional funds are expended for the onsite investigation. He noted the agreement will provide that should contamination be found, it will be cleaned up to the satisfaction of the applicable agencies with all cleanup costs born by the seller. It was further noted that since the results of the geotechnical studies are necessary to prepare a complete program environmental impact report, a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with CEQA guidelines to allow the Districts to proceed with the preparation of a prepurchase agreement. The Director of Engineering advised that an Initial Study, Environmental Impact Assessment and the Mitigated Negative Declaration have been noticed and circulated, as required by CEQA guidelines. Comments were received from the State of California Office of Planning and Research and the Department of Transportation, and the City of Tustin. Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Staff Report dated September 19, 1990 re Mitigated Negative Declaration for said project, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file Initial Study and Moved, seconded and duly carried: Environmental Impact Assessment That the Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment be, and is hereby, received and ordered. filed. `„ -12- 10/10/90 Receive and file written comments Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the following written comments on said project be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed: City/Agency - Dated State of California, Office of Planning and Research September 10, 1990 State of California, August 24, 1990 Department of Transportation, District 12 City of Tustin August 16, 1990 Discussion/oral comments Directors discussed the proposed site and expressed their concern regarding any passible cleanup costs. Mr. Dawes assured the Boards that the Districts had clearly specified that any cleanup required would be the owner's responsibiity. There were no oral public comments. A rovin Miti ated Ne ative Moved, seconded and duly carried: Declaration and authorizing f ling of a Notice of Determination That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-145, approving the Mitigated Negative Declaration and authorizing filing of a Notice of Determination. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written report of the Executive Committee That the written report of the Executive Committee's meeting on September 26, 1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to participate with representatives of other That staff be, and is hereby, affected local public entities to authorized to participate with obtain information re County's representatives of other affected Property Tax Administration Fee local public entities, including proposed to be implemented pursuant cities, special districts and the to SB 2557 County, to obtain information pertaining to the County's Property Tax Administration Fee proposed to be implemented pursuant to SB 2557. -13- .. V1 I.,i. ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel reviewed his Opposing Proposition 1 : The Memorandum to the Boards mailed with California Environmental Protection the Directors' agenda material Act of 1990 on the November 1990 relative to Proposition 128. He ballot reported that the Executive Committee discussed this initiative at length .� making several comments and suggestions relative to the Districts' position recommended by the Executive Committee on the initiative and what actions should be taken to inform the public of the reasons for whatever position the Boards might take. He then pointed out the legal limitations of public agencies regarding expenditures of public monies re ballot measures. Mr. Woodruff stated that it was certainly permissible to take a position on this proposition, but the Districts could not expend public monies to promote or publish materials that urge voters to take the same position as the Districts' official position. However, information could be prepared and disseminated simply itemizing the facts and findings of the Boards. He reiterated that the critical question was whether there is an expenditure of public funds, and if so, the information provided must be absolutely unbiased and not urge a particular action. Directors then entered into a discussion relative to Proposition 128 and the possible ways to inform the public of the Districts' position recommended by the Executive Committee and the reasons therefor. It was pointed out that although the Proposition is well-intended, it contains many provisions that are extremely complex and technical and covers several unrelated subjects which make it ill-suited for the initiative process. Many of the initiative measures are not scientifically-based and are contradictory to existing laws. If passed, the initiative could cost the Districts' ratepayers $50,000,000 per year which would more than double sewer rates. Director Peter Green stated that he would like to go on record as supporting Proposition 128 for a number of features it contained which, in his view, outweighed the Districts' concerns. The General Manager outlined the following public Information program discussed by the Executive Committee: - Forward a copy of the Staff Report and Resolution No. 90-143, if adopted, to appropriate cities and special districts within the County, and the County of Orange - Issue a press release - Place newspaper ads - The Directors further discussed the issue and suggested voting separately regarding the action to oppose Proposition 128 and the proposed public information program relative to any Districts' officia.l position on said proposition. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried by roll call vote: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-143, opposing Proposition 128: The California Environmental Protection Act of 1990 on the November 1990 ballot. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Director Peter Green requested that his opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. -14- 10/10/90 FURTHER MOVED, seconded and duly carried by roll call vote: That the Boards of Directors do hereby authorize and direct the staff to distribute a copy of Resolution No. 90-143 and information on the impact of Proposition 128 to the Districts and their ratepayers, to the media, Including newspaper ads, public agencies in Orange County and others, as deemed appropriate and allowable under applicable statutes. Director Peter Green requested that his opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Aut orizin the General ana er to negotiate an issue a purchase That the General Manager be, and is order contract for hereby, authorized to negotiate with Replacement U rade of Northern Orange County suppliers of equipment Telecom Tel e hone s em Switch compatible with the Districts' Equipment j5pecification No. E-19 telephone system and issue a purchase order contract to the Northern Telecom supplier with the lowest cost proposal for compatible equipment for Replacement/Upgrade of Northern Telecom Telephone System Switch Equipment (Specification No. E-192), in an amount not to exceed $126,200.00 plus tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the General Manager to Issue a purchase order contract for That the General Manager be, and is Video Production Services hereby, authorized to issue a Specific an No. S-047, to The purchase order contract for Video Premium Group Production Services, Specification No. S-047, to The Premium Group for a total amount not to exceed $32,925.00, to produce a new public information video on the Districts' wastewater management program. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Amendment No. 11 to Agreement for Employment of That the Boards of Directors hereby General Counsel adopt Resolution No. 90-144, approving Amendment No. 11 to Agreement for Employment of General Counsel. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Convene in closed session pursuant to overnment Code Sections 54956.9 The Boards convened in closed session and 54957.6 at 8:16 p.m. pursuant to Government _ Code Sections 54956.9 and 54957.6. ALL DISTRICTS At 9:10 p.m. the Boards reconvened in Reconvene in regular session regular session. -15- 10/10/90 ALL DISTRICTS Upon return from closed session, it Amen n ass fi ca on an was reported by the Joint Chairman Com ensati 0n Resa utian No. 7 -20 that it was appropriate to consider as amended, re GeneraI Manager s adoption of Resolution No. 90-152 salary regarding the General Manager's salary. Whereupon it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-152, amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, re General Manager's salary. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Upon return from closed session, the A rovin settlement of Case General Counsel reported on the action No. 0483 , Butler Engineering, of the Boards of Directors in the Inc. vs. uounty Sanitation matter of litigation entitled Butler Districts of Orange County Engineering, Inc. vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. X604838, as follows: It was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the settlement of the litigation entitled Butler Engineering, Inc. vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. X604838, by the payment of the sum of $65,000 by the Districts to Butter Engineering, Inc. in exchange for a Dismissal of Prejudice of the pending litigation and agreement of the parties of no finding nor acknowledgement of fault or responsibility by the Districts, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:12 p.m. , October 10, 1990. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin Professional Services Agreement wi h ill dan Associates That the Selection Committee re project report far Contract certification of the final negotiated No. 2-9-RS fee relative to the Professional Services Agreement with Willdan Associates for preparation of a Project Report for Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 90-146-2, approving said Professional Services Agreement with Willdan Associates for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $35,080.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -16- 10/10/90 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: iournmen That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:12 p.m. , October 10, 1990. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. o the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 1 to the plans Contract No. 3-33R and specifications for Rehabilitation of Manholes on Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-33R, authorizing a net addition of $21,067.00 to the contract with Sancon Engineering, Inc. for three items of additional work or deletions, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 3 - Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:12 p.m., October 10, 1990. DISTRICTS 5 8 6 Actions re Application for Leave to File Late Claim submitted b omcast Cablevision re Contract To. 5-29 Receive and file General Counsel 's Moved, seconded and duly carried: Memorandum That the General Counsel 's Memorandum dated September 18, 1990, recommending denial of Application for Leave to File Late Claim dated September 10, 1990 submitted by Comcast Cablevision for alleged damages in connection with Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Force Main and Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 5-29, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive file antl den A lication Moved, seconded and duly carried: for Leave to File Late Cla m That the Application for Leave to File Late Claim dated September 10, 1990 submitted by Comcast Cablevision for alleged damages in connection with Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Forte Main and Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 5-29, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:12 p.m., October 10, 1990. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:12 p.m., October 10, 1990. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:12 p.m. , October 10, 1990. -17- 10/10/90 DISTRICTS 6 7 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: APprovIn Chanqe Order No. 3 to the plans and specitications re ThatChange Order No. 3 to the plans Cow o. 14-1-IB and specifications for Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to `.,.' Fairview Road, Contract No. 14-1-18, authorizing an addition of $90,319.00 to the contract with Steve Bubalo Construction Co. for four items of additional work, and granting a time extension of 13 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby,approved. DISTRICTS 6 1 7 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving hange rder No. 4 to the plans and specifications re _ That Change Order No. 4 to the plans Contract o. 14-1-18 and specifications for Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road, Contract No. 14-1-18, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities resulting in a net deduction of $28,641.00 from the contract with Steve Bubalo Construction Co. , be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICTS 6 7 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Con ract No. 1 -1-18 as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-147, accepting Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road, Contract No. 14-1-18, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 6 7 8 14 Actions re a opt on of Resolution of Necessity to acquire right-of- way by em nent domain for Contract No. 14-1-1A Verbal report of General Counsel The Assistant General Counsel recalled that at the September Board meeting the Directors had adopted a resolution setting a public hearing for October 10, 1990, relative to adoption of a Resolution of Necessity to acquire right-of-way by eminent domain in order to construct the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A. He briefly outlined the actions listed on the agenda that evening. Mr. Ide advised that the owners of the property proposed to be taken by eminent domain would have an opportunity to address the Boards. He noted that following the close of the public hearing, the Directors would consider adoption of the proposed Resolution of Necessity. Public Hearing The Chairman announced that this was the time and place fixed by the .Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14 for a public hearing relative to adoption of a Resolution of Necessity to acquire right-of-way by eminent domain for construction of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A. �.✓ -18- 10/10/90 Open public hearing The Chairman declared the hearing open at 9:15 p.m. Receive and file written report of Moved, seconded and duly eneral Counsel carried: That the written report of General Counsel dated September 18, 1990, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file Proof of Service Moved, seconded and duly by Mail of Notice of Hearing carried: That the Proof of Service by Mail of Notice of Hearing to property owners dated September 25, 1990, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file written comments Moved, seconded and duly from property owners carried: That the following comments from, or on behalf of, property owners be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed: From Dated - Drummy Garrett King 8 Harrison October 1, 1990 (on behalf of Mesa Verde Country Club) - Southern California Edison Company October 5, 1990 - Sullivan, Workman 8 Dee October 9, 1990 (on behalf of Magna Enterprises, Inc.) - Carlsmith Ball Wichman Murray Case October 10, 1990 Mukai 8 Ichiki (on behalf of Harbor Mesa Trust) Oral presentation by staff The Director of Engineering reviewed the recommended alignment of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A, and pointed out that in accordance with the requirements of the City of Costa Mesa, the sewer could not go up Harbor Boulevard. He advised that three property owners had objected to the proposed sewer alignment through their property. Staff and General Counsel have been unable to negotiate the purchase of easements necessary from these three property owners, Mesa Verde Country Club, Southern California Edison Co. and Magna Enterprises, Inc./Harbor Mesa Trust, required for construction of Contract No. 14-1-1A. Mr. Dawes reviewed other alignments considered and explained why they were not chosen as the best alternatives. With regard to the section of the pipe going through a parking lot owned by Magna Enterprises, he noted that the work would be completed within two weeks., and the Districts would refurbish the parking lot after the pipe was installed. _19_ 10/10/90 Staff also advised that in choosing the best alignment through the golf course 'and Edison properties they had to take into consideration a bridge over the Santa Ana River planned to be built in the future by the County of Orange, and the alignment llft�, selected will accommodate this bridge. Mr. Dawes indicated that the Districts would replace whatever trees had to be removed from the Mesa Verde Golf Course during the course of construction. He noted that the sewer would be placed at a higher elevation than the golf course but that it would be designed to blend into the course. Oral testimony by property The Chairman recognized the owners and others following persons who addressed the Boards regarding their objections to the alignment of Contract No. 14-1-1A: - Carol Herrera, Harbor Mesa Trust Ms. Herrera stated that she was the Property Manager for the property owned by Magna Enterprises. She questioned the length of time to complete the section of the sewer within the parking lot used by their tenants and indicated that previously she had been told it would be considerably longer than the two weeks now quoted. Ms. Herrera also expressed concern relative to the inconvenience of those persons using the parking lot during construction and later if the sewer needed maintenance work. Districts' staff assured her that concrete gravity sewers such as this rarely have any problems and that there would not be a manhole to the parking lot. Therefore, they should not expect to be inconvenienced in the future. Ms. Herrera advised that the property owner is strongly opposed to this alignment and he did not wish to discuss the issue or alternatives with staff. - Jim Kennedy, Southern California Edison Company Mr. Kennedy stated that the Edison Company has the same concerns as the Sanitation Districts in that they must be prepared to meet the increased demand placed on their facilities. They are concerned because the right-of-way requested by the Sanitation Districts passes through one of the most encumbered corridors they have which contains lines that serve approximately 60% of SCEC customers in Orange County. Mr. Kennedy stated that the corridor Is only 75 feet wide. He added that should they ever be required to move their 220,000 volt line over if the Santa Ana River Channel is widened by the Corps of Engineers, there would be very little room if the Sanitation Districts acquires the proposed 20-foot easement. He also noted that they may have to place the six 66,000 volt lines currently in this same corridor underground at some time in the future, and SCEC would then need the easement area to do so. Mr. Kennedy requested a 30-day delay in considering the Resolution of Necessity in order to allow more time to discuss other passible alternatives. He indicated SCEC wished to cooperate with the Sanitation Districts but would like a little more time to find a mutually-agreeable location for the Districts' line. -20- 10/10/90 Staff responded that a 30-day continuance could prevent construction from beginning in January which was crucial . Even if the resolution is adopted, staff noted that they would continue to negotiate with all the property owners to attempt to reach a mutual agreement. �..✓ - Charles W. Parret attorney for Mesa Verde Country Club & Country lu member Mr. Parret indicated that the Mesa Verde Country Club strongly opposed the Resolution of Necessity. He stated that they believe the sewer line will be extremely injurious to the Country Club. He also expressed concern because the elevation of the sewer would create a barrier on the northern boundary of the Club. Mr. Parret advised that the County Club is in the process of redesigning the course to create championship facilities and to encourage the LPGA to add the course to its tour, and he observed that berm would effectively prevent them from designing the hole in this area as a championship hole. He stated that he had consulted with other agencies that believed this pipeline could be placed underground. Mr. Parret noted that it was his understanding that the Country Club was originally Informed that the plans were for an underground sewer rather than an above-ground structure. He also stated his belief that the County would not build the proposed bridge over the Santa Ana River from Garfield to Gisler. Therefore, in his view, several other alternative alignments should be possible. The Districts' Director of Engineering responded to Mr. Parret's comments. He explained that if the sewer were to be placed underground, it would have to be a siphon, which is a 66-inch pipe. It would also need to be 600 feet long, which far exceeds the length the Districts' staff recommends for a siphon because of maintenance problems. Mr. Dawes also advised that the highest point of the sewer along the golf course would be four feet. He stated that there would be no structure built on the site. Mr. Dawes reiterated that many alternative alignments were studied. Several of the choices were so disruptive to traffic on very busy streets that they were unacceptable. With regard to the County's proposed bridge to connect Garfield and Gisler, the Districts' staff cannot recommend a project to the Board that may have to be relocated in a few years. He pointed out that the Districts must design this sewer to allow for the planned bridge. Mr. Parret's opinion on whether it would ever be built was just that, an opinion. Several Directors agreed with Mr. Parret's concerns relative to the importance of the design of each hale and reassured him that the Districts would strive to cooperate with the County Club to arrive at an agreeable solution to the problem. It was suggested that a golf course architect might possibly be consulted. The width of the fairway in the location of the proposed sewer line was discussed. It was pointed out that because it is quite wide in this area, the elevation on the north end should pose no problem for golfers. -21- 10/10/90 Staff reiterated that notwithstanding the proposed Resolution of Necessity, they would continue to attempt to negotiate an acceptable agreement with the Club. Close hearing There being no further public comments, the Chairman closed the hearing at 10:25 p.m. Adopting Resolution of Necessity Directors expressed their desire re acquisition Of property by to continue to address the eminent domain concerns Of each Of the property owners in an attempt to reach an acceptable solution in each case. They also noted the importance of moving forward with the proposed project and did not wish to delay it. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards Of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-148, describing a certain project; making statement of the public use for which certain property is to be taken in reference to statutory authority to acquire said property by eminent domain; describing general location and extent of said property to be taken; declaring findings and determinations on public interests and necessity for said property; authorizing and directing eminent domain proceedings to be commenced in Superior Court to acquire said property, including application for possession of said property prior to judgment; and making other determinations required in connection with the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:27 p.m. , October 10, 1990. DISTRICT 7 Actions re Annexation No. 125 - Tract No. 9608 Rescinding Board' s action on Moved, seconded and duly carried: th May 13, 1987 auorizing the General Manager to enter into an That the Board's action on a reement between the ro ert May 13, 1987 authorizing the owner developer, Or COUnty General Manager t0 enter into an Harbors Beaes antl rks District agreement between the property and the ity ochf OrangePa re said owner/developer, County annexation Sanitation District No. 7, the Orange County Harbors, Beaches and Parks District, and the City of Orange, setting forth the terms and conditions of proposed Annexation No. 125, be, and is hereby, rescinded. `, -22 10/10/90 A rovin Sewer Service A reement Moved, seconded and duly carried: with rawford Hills Associates That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 90-149-7, approving Sewer Service Agreement with Crawford Hills Associates providing for deferred payment Of annexation acreage fees for a portion of the territory contained in proposed Annexation No. 125. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Authorizing initiation of Moved, seconded and duly carried: roceedin s re ro osed Annexation No. 1 5 - Trac No. Vbud That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 90-150-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex 182 acres of territory to the District located to the vicinity of Chapman Avenue and Crawford Canyon Road in the City of Orange, proposed Annexation No. 125 - Tract No. 9608 to County Sanitation District No. 7, and rescinding Resolution No. 87-39-7. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Grant of Easement from Mr. & Mrs. Albert B. Schilling for That the Board of Directors hereby right-of-way required re adopts Resolution No. 90-151-7, Contract No. 7-14 accepting Grant of Easement from Mr. and Mrs. Albert B. Schilling for right-of-way required in connection with Abandonment of Nine District No. 7 Pump Stations, Contract No. 7-14, and authorizing payment in the amount of $1,000.00 for said right-of-way. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:27 p.m.., October 10, 1990. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:27 p.m. , October 10, 1990. Secretary of t Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 -23- Fd� 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE '•9106/90 PAGE 1( REPORT NUMBER AP43 •.••TY-SAN!;A+IA 6 Bi6iA#Gi8-0 CLAIMS PAID 09/12/90 -POSTING DATE SWUM ) � - JPh •NT- NO "`MOOR -ES SR{PTTON 169208 A 6 6 INDUSTRIES $10.554.06 SCRUBBER PAN INLET INSTALLATION o".9 A" P-M7--9iRi _ 109210 MAD .SYSTEMS �i9.2.00 INeTBDN¢Rl'.PART - 109211 ASR ANALYSIS 5570.25 ..MECHANICAL TESTING SCO2R2 A-M, "..'il Bc ^^:...� HHBEO..iaTiBN 109213 ACTION-MARTIN $150.65 HARDWM 109214 AIR ACCESSORIES CO. 91.851.85 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 44V.2TO-St"4t[S 8989 {9. .:.. .ABflIA1 PHOTOS FOfl-DIET-flAN-BOHVR4 , 109216 ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY CO.. LTD. -� i15.924.31 )MMU COVERS 109211 SAFETY SUPPLY AMERICA i1.N36.62 SAFETY SlUmIES —1682L8--�5o9NA^•-AZ FA2.87 ... BPBGEALTF""SEE 109219 ROBCD INC. s/OR AMERICAN SEALS S4.895.80 SEALS 6 GASKETS 109220 AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY $291.12 CAMM/PITH 09221 SETIEp-GON6TNUCi1-0N -"ICED ,.MMRGMGV ioR-BePAieb-BlfiT-7 6-2 109222 APCO VALVE S PRIMER CORP - $1.498.44 VALVE 109223 A-PLUS SYSTEMS '' 8808.84 - 0=ICES 6 ADS o'. E A —1" . 4 APPLE ONE •- •" 3 4EIEOR/HT-BH MwEs.. 109225 AOUANETICS $98.74 TOOL PIT 109226 ARATEV SERVICES. INC. $3.572.20 UNITURN RENTALS X R09227 'A'S ON •376 98 PQlE PAOSS ti 209228 RANDOLPH AUSTIN CO. ' S57.80 LAB SUPPLIES w 109229 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CO. , $510.80- TRUCE.PAST —1 9230 •Ui0MA446-T-WIND A caN ROLFDO i14m 4, H68D'016'PPART 109231 B R T HYDRAULICS 9359.67 MECHANICAL PARTS n 109232 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE S40.633.95 IT REMOVAL M.0.10-29-90 00D23S GR A':AM "UEP"RO "2`.-Oa amo88IRGo:.VICHS 1--' 109234 SACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE - i189.00 TESTING 109235 BACKSTREET GALLERY 255.57 FRAMING ,. —409236 P S-.Y•-RAOOT*T-ANG-#SBOG. ".562t50 --GO 7RWTiEF -3 BERVICES-PI-34-2.P27,F2-23-6— 109237 BARTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $3.502.39 LAB SUPPLIES 109238 BEATRICE HUNT WESSON $3.345.02 REFUND USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT —109239 "EiN.YILLFAN-F110GT--S .P�—sib e6D2.b. vaGINReBRNG-6®V20ES-5-33.5-74 109240 BETTER BUILD SCALE PROD. $650.00 LAB EQHIPMENI' 109241 BLACK BON CORP $145.81 COMBDTSB HARDWIRE —099242--"- GOL4A-MDFATQA-SERVICE I1 *8 RADIATOR-w"B 109243 BON-A-RUES $214.07 TRUCK PUTS 109244 BROWN 6 CIALDWELL $4.804.25 LAB SERVICES 10924E BROWN-4-CALDWELL-G0"UL-TiN6-- .., 84.8` ®6FN68RINF8EeV;C66-F2-2I-5-1�R2-E5�1.3.4.3-- 109246 THE BURKE COMPANY 298.14 . ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 109247 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. f1.320.24 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES —109248 GARY-4-GTREED- 951-3.46 P@E1P-OABH-RBiNSORBBN®1'I' — 309249 CAL-CHEM SALES $148.75 LAB SUPPLIES 309250 CALIF. ASSOC. OF SANITATION S510.00 REGISTRATION —kG9256 C BAD-MANUFAGitlR4N64A 01B AYN6:: 109252 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS 943.268.51 ENGINEERING SERVICES I-9 109253 CHRISTINE T: CARR S1.134.00 COMPUTER INPUT SERVICES FUND NO 9199 JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/06/90 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 '^CLAIMS^PAID 01/12/90 ,p OSTIN6. DATF 99/12/90 W...... an_ vEnma AMOUNT - ' . ..TaTID° 109254 CHARLES W. CARTER CO. s51a.17 PUMP PART .a_ae TFLRPEONE 0Y8X8M MODIFICATIONS 109256 CHAMPION FENCE CO. 01.628.00 VENCING' 109257 CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC. 5568.40 PAINT SUPPLIES .cg uentlE-CRAMNSHIET INC t2.1°-°..�0^' MEGRANFf. FARTS-REPAIR-- 109259 COAST AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION S53.1e TRUCE PARTS 109260 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $121.13 SAFETY SUPPLIES 109061 - - •0.--r- AIRS - 109262 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF $6,375.00.,.,: PUMP PARTS - 109263 CONNELL O.M.-PARTS / DIY. $212.12 ' TBUCE PARTS -IOA26� ^OMSOL{.OA-T[D-ELEGTN{dIrDISt -�..9a406.4-i BLECFRIOiUPPLE86 - 109265 CONTAINERIZED CHEMICAL DISPOSAL S350.00 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL 109266 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS S1.923.18 BLUEPRINTING `09267 0°mu..ED_ .0 N6 109268 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $72.96 TRUCE PARTS 109269 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC ' $415.18 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES _--&49=4 LARRX- URZI--TAUCK-4-ZQUIPNEN7 `nso-080.00 66UD66-REMOVAL-M.O.T-N-90- _ m 109271 ORE. INC. $846.40 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 309272 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE $517.06 TIRES = 109273 nAFT^ TURTawrmyq . 1ZX.02 81STBUIBtiG-0ABTS 109274 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS `. $170.95 LAB SUPPLIES ' _ 109275 DICKSONS SB47.88 AIR CONDITIONER -M%276 DORADO-EN{ERPJCI4ES.-IAC A925-%4 PLANT-MRFN7HNANCE 6-R8PAI116 109277 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $2,148.89 PAINT SUPPLIES 10927E E.I.L. INSTRUMENTS. INC. $1.879.ST ELECTRIC PARTS N -109279 &ASZMAU.-{HC ^.M3 .. BFPiCBSIWPIIBB 109280 EL TORO COMPUTER SOLUTIONS $25.00 COMPUTER REPAIRS 109281 ENCHANTER. INC. $4,800.00 OCEAN MONITORING H.0.3-14-90 -109282-- DODGE-CONSTRUCTION-NEYS - ---674.00 ADVERTISEMENT-- 109283 LEEDS 6 NORTHRUP S937.25 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 1092B4 JOHN S. FALKENSTEIN P.E. 63.600.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-4. J-20 --4-O92A8 -FEDERAL--EXPRESS-COR 166.BY AIR-FREIf8T 109286 FERRELLGAS 922.95 PROPANE 109287 FILTER SUPPLY CO. 996.19 PUMP PARTS -109288---FMDLET-AOHES4VES -59.524.32-REFUND USER-FEB-OVEMtPATI�Ii- 109289 FISCHER 6 PORTER CO. $3.579.94 CHLORINATION PARTS 109290 FLUID HANDLING SYSTEMS S1.169.61 PUMP PARTS -1-09281 -FOUN44101-VALLEY-CAMERA- `08." ^ILM - 109292 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $240.52 PAINT SUPPLIES 1D9293 THE FOXBORO CO. $2,653.26 INSTRUMENT PARTS -30.9290 _C7-tT-OF-FULLER;ON-- --- ---SI55.00- - NATER-06H ---------------- 109295 GANAHL LUMBER CO. 9263.71 BUILDING MATERIALS 109296 GARRATT•CALLAHAN COMPANY $1,330.75 CHEMICALS -109297 GA4ES-94BEROLASS-146-TAL`_E.^^ .... .. BSRGLA6G-FABRIGATION- 109298 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $175.31 TELEPHONE SERVICES 109299 GEORGE LEECH 9 ASSDCIATES 6192.88 PIPS FUN( 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/56/90 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 GO 'MTV BANITATi0 CLAIMS PAID 09/12/90PDSTING DATE. 09/12/90 JMRR ANIJID "ENDS. DCSCRIPTiON 109392 SEA COAST DESIGNS S2r213.78 OFFICE FURNITURE 309583 `NAHAACK-SURR41 01,230 57 - M@RLR 109394 PACIFIC EXCHANGER R MACHINE ,. "0.359.38 VAPORIZER� 109396 SMITH-EMERY CO. S2,123.50 SOIL TESTING tl.0.6-14-89 �00396- u - A^ENOUSELWES7SRN-RE67ON 0IB6.i' ^^F1yd0E 209397 SOLAR TURBINES INCORPORATED $816.47 - MECHANICAL PARTS 109398 SO. COAST AIR QUALITY 9260.00 PERMIT FEES -10039 A-0UAL17" iir5 _ 109400 SOUTH COAST DODGE $76.50 TRRCR PABTO 109401 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. �$9.108.53 - .POWER -109408- ^AL GAS-CO. 031r595.26 NA1'0RA6 GAS 109403 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $8.299.91 DIESEL FUEL 109404 STAMEN Z. SPASSOFF. P.E. $4.320.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-34-2 109406 9 STARd' ^ ••$786.2I 109407 STAR TOOL SUPPLY CO. 'p-$925.00 TREE R 109407 2STEMMERS AL-MG TREE SERVICE CE ? f925.00 - `TREE TRIlDQB6 SERVIC83 -R09408- S;ERL-INSTARS f93.81 STEF0:.-RBPP6FBS 109410 SUMMIT STEEL f1$848.28 LABS fTl 109910 SUPELCO• INC. t898.28 LAB SUPPLIES X - 1494;1 l0IA INLNFALf.IR_TOGL,,INC 06.226 HE 109412 SYMANTEC CORP. , $57.06 - CWRPPBH SOFTWARE w 109413 TG SCIENTIFIC GLASS t1.792.97 TEST TUBES -i"414 ---4-04'L OR-OUNN-MFG.-60NPANY 586.85 EI.BBF m�Fn.:o 109415 TEKMAR COMPANY S407.16 LAB SUPPLIES D 109416 THEO-TELLO-BUSCH. INC. S384.00 INSPECT CRANE I -5094LT 9"AAIORCAL R16_00 66R-GMANAGING .. W 10941E THURO R ASSOC. f2.930.00 COtlSOLT1EG SERVICES 109419 -ITS TROPICAL FISH S1.072.59 OCEAN SAMP3m SUPPLIES -109420 7RAVE1 1RAWEL ".481 80 TRAV0U62O:aCES 109421 H.O. TRERICE CO. $1.193.87 INSTRUMENT PARTS 109422 TRUCK R AUTO SUPPLY. INC. $B5T.S2 TRUCE PARTS -109423- '.6--TUGKSIH-SONlI-ND -i141-7 2i- iiiBT9U1BNFiAeFO 109424 UNOCAL $168.35 C1 Dun 109425 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $53.78 PARm SBRVLCES -109426---VARINCCORPORAT f3.S99A3 66B-BUIYLh 10942B VALIN CORPORATION i128.43 HARDWARE PARTS 109428 VALLEY SETTEE SUPPLY CO. .1r998.48 HARDWARE 109431 VILLAG (NURSERIES SUPPLY - $549.51 SAFETY SUFPLIBS 109431 VILLAGE NURSERIES i314.77 ' LANDBUAPING SOPPLIRS -109432------C AST-COASEN-R-GO -5224.0 O .BURING6CLAIIfS-ADMNIB'CRATOR- 109433 WEST COAST ANALYTICAL CHEMICA SRV. 5510.00 CAUSTIC SBRVLCES 109434 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY S-4 8T T.47 CAUSTIC SODA tl.O.8-9-89 --i6945D YGPOK-60Ri. `Lb.B4 .:,PLBR-6HAeSS ---------------- CLAIMS-PAIa09/12/9O 4.19i.535.-12- ----------- FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9106190 PAGE I REPORT NUMBCR AP43 CLAIMS PAID 09/12/90 POSTING DATE 09/12/90' WARRANT -0- vCND.. AMOUNT- D&SCA424ZOX 109346 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. S1.606.22 SAPETI SUPPLIES .nnvn 61 a VALVE 109348 MICROIGE COMPUTER STORES $79.69 ' C01@IIfAR SOPIVARE 109349 MICROSOFT $222.00 PUBLICATION -409350 -M1LLAp-ZLE-ArN ERVUZ 517E g0 8LN0ATOL1AIMENERINC&- 109351 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. S604.00 - ELECTRIC PARTS 199352 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL. INC. f92.49 - PUBLICATION .nn.cv Nn.IUMr"• i egpgA7nn.re f1..7°8 25 " 109354 MOTOROLA. INC. 4276.91 INSTRUMENTPARTS 109355 NEAL SUPPLY CO. f371.30 INSTRUMENT BUPPLI66 j19356 "ELCO-RROOU.SS tia310.39 NBWRD-0888-F88-0P01AAYNEN'F---- 109357 NEWARK ELECTRONICS f133.19 IMST101IDR SUPPLIES 10935E ON SYSTEMS CO. 629.999.82 CHU04I311 M.0.2-I4-90 -1" 10936 ORANGE BEARING. INC. . BATTING$ 109361 ORANGE VALVE A FITTING CO. f1.150150.5555 PITCIpGB -109363 CSDOCNSELF-FUN •OIS.BA " BEBCIUMADVANCE _-- fTl 109365 CSDOC SELF-FUNDED MEDICAL INS f100.$30.00 PNBIURM ON X 109369 PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF f30.00 80BSCNIP[IOq Z -169365 oer.c.r a 'Tv ecEy. r •l SAS 83 eAR8T4 °"^ Avg 109366 PACIFIC BELL $10.09 - TELEPHON[ SERVICES- ICU 109367 PACTEL CELLULAR $51.29 CELLUAR T6EPRONB SERVICES -109360----RADGETS TNOMRSON- 109369 PARTS UNLIMITED $37.78 TRUCE PARTS 109370 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS. INC. $45.0S6.03 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.3-11-88 -109372 BOLA NOL0.CORISES,ION 309.19 SAFET"Y-3•A:• - r 109373 POLY ERE. PRISES♦ INC. .173.78 BAP8T6 SUPPLIES 109373 POLYEURE. INC. f13 d73.7B OOLYMC M.0.1.10-90.E-V-89 0937P--RORTER--BOLLER AVICEr-INC.-- •198.00 IL$C7RUC-PNGTS------- 109375 HAROLD ION PLAY ICE $250.00 ICE 309376 PRODUCTION PLATING f250.00 NGPORI 08AR PEN OVERPAYMENT -109378 THE, INC.JELFS-BYWTSON�^ 02$346.62 IN81RUlDOf7l'ATION INSPECTION M.0.8-10-80 10937E ENS. I $158.13 INSTRUMENT PARTS 189380 QUEST INTERNATIONAL INC. 5158.13 IT8T8IQENlT PARTS -109380- --RANCHO-BANTiA60�OL LE GE ' .-------- 109381 RED WING SHOES $203.92 SAPETT SENEB 109382 R.A. REED ELECTRIC $2,836.01 ELECTRIC N$PAIRS -109383 RENE DT-LEN. 318A9 '1WD'OTANT-E nczs---- . 109384 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. $3.565.11 GANCB/NANDIIR$ 109385 DETECTOR ELECTRONICS CORP. 9203.19 llflll M08'T PARTS 109386— A SEMOU#T/UNILOC - - --fl•659.81- -------IMBTTUIDUl1'SUPPLIEB ----- ------ 109381 RUTAN L TUCKER $5.271.91 IBM SRVICBS BGTBICE/NON'l-UEBSON 109388 RTAN-HERCO $333.39 HARDWARE -S.A.R.-MACNENERT�NG�1"• E954.00 109390 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. SI32.110 PARTS"CL61NBfl 109391 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT•L $200,969.11 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-13-90 FUN( 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/45/90 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 '••Ni*-&A*i+"+GN DiSfRJETS OF 0RANCE G@uNfV , CLAIMS PAID 09/12/90 ;POSTING DATE 09112/90. J ARMA!!T-N0. VENDOR 1. 109300 GIERLICH-MITCHELLr INC. $3,345.36 PUMP PARTS —iA9301 `OEA3-Yf.SiCRN�tEC6ANPI3ON .42r800 00 BSPiRT SNSJ➢'NO-BRRIfi^^° 109302 DON GREEK 6 ASSOCIATES i $2.617.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES 109303 HACH COMPANY S32.92 LAB BDPPTLEB ? —309389 .ARR-{N;4ON-INDUSSR2 . P- .RT;CS i^AA 11 ENGIN ' 109305 HATCH 6 ALYN. INC. 25,505.60 CONSTRUCTION PARTS 109306 Sr A. NEA LT AND f125 s303.60 CONSTRUCTION PI-75-1 —iO9307 °e.,, r.. °e.NA 109308 HIGH VOLTAGE ELECTRIC $1,550.80 , ; Kl.¢CTR PARTS 109309 HILTI. INC. S976.32 HARDWARE �8931- —NO ERBiGEN--G.Y.S.--CAbiF.--r{NG—G769..6 NBCRANICRL PASTS 109311 HOUSE OF BATTERIES $1,019.91 BATTERIES 109312 R.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. S4.043.51 PAINT SUPPLIES 109314 INO INDUSTRIES 9559.86 bINeTB100Q1R Y1BT - 109315 INA ENGINEERS t1.980.09 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-27-2 iMPEM4AL--WEST-061HH6AU S6T.52i.97 PSRR008-CBt:OR2DE-N.0.A-11-9^ 109317 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1.460.21 CONNECTORS m 109318 INGRAM PAPER $9.783.33 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES m •"°•—.�.-.o19 St::SRNAi-IONAI.-SEN50 _ _2 .._. .. ...-_ 109320 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT - S381.52 ' WATER USE b0 109321 GREAT WESTERN SAN17ANY SUPP. S767.69 JANITORIAL'SUPPLIES —109.322 X. —JONNSON-COMPANY 912.82 LAEAU°.9USE 109323 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY S195.03 ELECTRIC PARTS ➢ 109329 KANER COMPANY f2.204.90 SLECTRIC PARTS —IC9326 KIMMESERBROS. -SS6.-94 GASIO°ee. V'I IP9326 KINMERLE BROS.. INC. 656.78 MCNET8 109327 KING BEARING. INC. f 2.656.78 WCEitlE 80PPLI88 —1-0 9 32 9---- KNAX INDUSTRIAL 831 G.90 -UNIVERBAIfCERCULTS- 109329 VLAD INDUKOGAN SUPPLIES ilr$30.35 TOOLS 109330 YLADIMIP KOGAN f30.35 tlILPAGB EXPENSE —109332 LEAGUE OF CALIF. 69.06 00 MEBERSOTIODUBRVICR6-5-SS-` 109333 LEAGUE OF CAL CITIES 629019.00 MEMBERSHIP DSE6 19%333 LEE 0 RO CONSULTING ENGR. f61r 919.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-33 —i09335 LE-ROT-GECTRIC CO.rA088G. id 9505.1.r 9I4m REFAIRSBBRVICES- 109335 LEWCB ELECTRICC 9821.35 TRUCE REPAIRS 109336 LIMITOpOUE CORP.Op i821.35 EL¢CTeIC SNPPLIE9 —199337--�^.DI-D000 ` 18.9E JANITORIAR4�ER-OVBRBAYIDSM' 109339 A.J. LYNCH CO. t$37.19 JANITORIAL CSELIES 109339 MPS $37.19 PHOTOGRAPHIC 6ERVIC63 199391 MALCOLN EPIRNIELECTRONICS . INC. f1.860.77 INSTRUMENT 58RVICE3 M.0.7-12-E9 109392 MATT EL FOR 4NG f319.90 INSSRU!ffiTf PARTS —i09344 DO.. RER iNG�. 2r353.70 OCEANSHARON PARTS 1093A9 DON NNA ER S2.100.00 OCEAN MONITORING CONSULTANT 109345 MCKENNA ENGfl. 6 EQUIP. 36.409.I6 PUMP PARTS ' POND NO 9199 - 1T DIST WORKING WIT" PROCESSING DATE 09/06/90 REPORT HOHBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ^+"sNS-Yt1D-OiF11L9o—YOSTIN0."T. nnllal90 SUNHART WORT OI OPEN FUND 3LN91,06 02 OPER FUND 10,406.30 03 OPEN FUND 13,705.35 P5 OPEN FUND 360.94 I7 OPEN FUND 13.179.95 07 GAP FAC FUND 659.35 - -/11-OPEN-WIND. 014 OPER POND 49.62 914 CAP PAC POND 43.7575 OS a DIP ve 70 0667 OPER POND 3.359.0707 R 7AI4 OPER FUND 9.03 O WIND CORP - CP 100,224.16 IT1 S.P eEkTH" RO INS./ S.Y. LIRE INS. PU101S 100.224.16 X v^BRINr r•vim 2 W �' f.1B7.333.12 T F( 0 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING-DATE ' 9/20/9u PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 CLAIMS PAID09/26/90 - ST POIN6' D ATE 09/2.6/90 - IIA ODI NT IIB MEN 109453 AALNAR $95.00 REGISTRATION 409464 A86 LUMBER CORP. $214-0`.—r. � ,,�AWZL^-.LNCNATSRIALS 109455 AT 6 T $484.88 TANG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICE 109456 AERO TECH SURVEYS. INC. t2.205.46 'IPERTO SURVEYING i0946T -YPPLV INC• f301.0• VABUON-— 109458 AIR PRODUCTS 6 CHEMICAL INC. S45.898.00 - OEM AGREEMENT-OKY. GEN 9YST. H.O.8-9-09 109459 SAFETY SUPPLY AMERICA $13.08 SAFETY SUPPLIES _____4G9qAfi A, , ... ...v... AIR 109461 '' ROSCO INC. E/OR AMERICAN SEALS - $13.090.13 RARDWARR 109462 AMERITECH S97.74 tCOPIER LEASES —4-0946b '1Wc" CORPORATION 97 695 00 'eASIM-PARTe O 209464 CITY OF ANANEIP S425.598.37 ENGINEERING SERVICES H.0.12-10-06 109465 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION t23.256.00 SEWER REPAIRS DIST 7 —:{0;5 FPLIBS 109467 APPLE. ONE $1.863.24 - TEMPORARY SERVICES 109468 ARATEY SERVICES, INC. $2.792.93 " UNIFORM RENTALS —169469 RMSOCIATIO 76.66 -MEDIC.AL--6-DBNTAL-INB.--AOHINISTRATORS­ 109470 AURORA/HYOROMATIC PUMP CO. $516.26 PUMP PART ITI 109471 AWARDSBTROPHIES $21.09 NAME PLAQUES X 1694T2 F16CON OIRFO&Al RRAV1 MOVA]6 NM_Q 1D-23-O0 _ r109473 BANK OF AMERICA " f3.IS2.0 'BANK CAROB UO 309474 P.Y. BAROTTI AND ASSOC. f6.1B7.5D CONSTRUCTION BERV. P1-34-2,P2-3],P2-23-6 —1094a5-- BrBER CI ,492.52 LAS SUED-OOMP-DI64'AISUTION 10947E BEATER SCIENTIFIC PPODUC TB $1,050.00 CAR SUPPLIES 109477 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES. INC. f1.050.00 CAR NABN TICRETS 109419 NOWARO-ODIATOR $215 66 RADIATOR REPAIR TRIBUTSON _ �-' 109480 BOLSARENN RADIATOR SERVICE ' $498.39 MECHANIC REPAIR 109480 BRENNER-PIEDLER 6 ASSOC., INC. f498.30 MECHANICAL PARTS -�D9482 BROWN ERIGBS 109483 BNOWN 6 LASSOCIA CONSULTING $40.491.72 ENGINEERING SERVICES SERVICES J-19 I09483 BUSH ANO R,6E CIATES. INC. t6.744.26 SURVEYING -RMMBUR RE9 88-71 —109488 C.OY--6.-A.COMD N�181.00 REGISTRATION 109486 C.O.B.R.A.COMPLIANCE SYS f187.00 COMPUTER CLASS 10948E CPT CORP. / SUMMIT SOLUTIONS f95.00 COMPUTER CLA98 REGISTRATION —109486 06 t990 CPANV cles$550.06 PARCORPS NCR 10948E CAL- CYPCA CONFERENCE f$34.59 1" SRBNCB REGISTRATION 109909 CAL-GRABS FOR RESEARCH, INC. f34.39 LAB 9UPPLIE9 109492 CJOHNHRI TINE T. ENOINECRS f387$515.00 ENGINEERING IN UTSERVICES SERVICES I-9,P7-39r J-15 109493 CHRISTINE T. CARR f315.00 COMPUTER INPUT SBRVIC88 —149494 CENTER-OOMMUNA CA44ONE-4Y 6if" $172.98 PAINT SUPPLIES CENTURY PAINT 1372.9E PAINT SUPPLI88 10949E CNEVP ON U.S.A.. INC. fI.326•19 PAINT SUPPLI83/GREASB 6 OIL —.69*97 COAST fiFIRE EQUIPMENT SS63.25 ESTEERS 149498 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $44.25 FIRS EQUIPMENT REPAIRS ' 10949E CORE-TERMER INSTRUMENT CO. i44.JS LAB SUPPLIES ' FUND NO 9199, - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/20/90 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CLAIMS PAID 09/26/99 POSTINS DATE 09/06/99". nrsrgypTinm 109499 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF S2.741.25 MECHANICAL PARTS n eg pp n4R1.e e.7-n" $BI@U9ER E8p{ILfBe 109501 CONARD•S PHOTOGRAPHY G223.13 ' PNOTO6RA08ICRRRVICEB 109502 CONNELL G.M. PARTS / DIV. G236.85 "TRQC[ORp PARTS o Lpy n� rn.T40�L�iRLCA1 DTeT- ...... 6i '`BLBiv:RpLFBB' 109504 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO $3.378.75 CHLORINE N.0.30-17-87 209505 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS 5594.08 BLUEPRINTING 309506 "nnRJLTSALEO-EGU1R VSPIOLI{T-AeeB101L]f 109507 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $955.90 ,TRUCK PARTS , 9, . 109508 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 52.790.20 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES ip950 RA-Y�URi-L--iA YGK-6 EOUTAMEOT f26 224 ^0 - 86UDG6-RBMOVALrM.O.2-31�90- 109518 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $160.40 7-135 SEE ANNEX FEE 109511 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $250.30 7-134 OBE ANNIE FEE .. gas son- EE P8B 109513 ONE. INC. $1.716.69 NARONARB 109514 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 3415.93 TIAEe ` ;'. —3�5Lo�^.E-AN2A�ORAORA7l0lL AID.-.. T 209516 DECO S244.10 —TOOLS-tAl-RBNTIILB TOOLS ITI 109517 DE2URIN AND/OR CS CO. 1.390.89 VALVE PARTS x Lo � L . earxmallG = 109519 STCON CORP. - 136. 9 109520 DISCO PRINT COMPANY fS6.1 INBTROI�RT PART 049. I1T ST.44 LR LURDNARB SAOSAALE �e g.r ev�EMS IIIC- 0. 3NBTANMBIIP .• L09522 DORA00 ENTERPRISES. INC. $16.627.74 PLANT MAINTENANCE 5 REPAIRS W 309523 OUNKEL BROS. MACH MOVING $1.650.08 SPACE RENTAL J-19A ..e524 nn N 109525 E.I.L. INSTRUMENTS. INC. $300.42 BLECTRIC PARTS 209526 EMA SERVICES. INC. $2.547.04 RHOIN88RIEG SERVICES P2-44. J-23-2 —i.R0627 -CRL e1.202 00 0CBAN.BIURLING----- 309528 EASTMAN. INC. 61,591.19 OPPIC1 SUPPLIES 109529 ECOANALYSIS. INC. $425.90 OCEAN MONITORING loo Rr0 " SAi- n0 ME ART 109531 ENCHANTER. INC. $2.200.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.3-14-90 _ 109532 ENGINEERS SALES-SERVICE CO. $56.88 PUMP PARTS —1-09533 "NET-"HIMNEY .7,731." PROPBBBIONAL-SERVICBS------ 109534 MARSHALL FAIRRES $178.68 DEPIDRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 109535 JOHN B. FALKENSTEIN P.E. $3.225.00 CONSTRUCTION SERV. J-7-4, J-20. .7-17 L09836OADO `"LEE-LSERKL: FZwSRB 109537 FEDERAL EMPRESS CORP. $250.00' AIR PRBIGNT 109538 FERRELLGAS S34.43 PROPANE 1 —5 88.8" GNLDRI ATION-PARTS -- 109540 FIRE MASTER s1.52B.94 SAFETY SUPPLIES 109541 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE $2.990.00 TITLE LITIGATION GUARANTEE 109642 RiMATiON-PARTS 109543 FLEXIBLE SYSTEMS $455.81 TRUCK PARTS 109544 FLICKINGER CO. SBO7.73 VALVE F\ 0 9199 •. JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING GATE • 9/26190 PAGE ■ \\\. REPORT NUMBER AP43 CLAIMS PAID 09/26/98 POSTINR,DATE 09/26tiH) OVC, nrtrgtprxnN 109545 FOME BIROS COMPANY $282.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES 'OUN`g1NJIAI ET CAMERA 219 63 T 109547- FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT ` 5940.87 _ . c R � pAINT SUPPLIES 109548 FOR ENTERPRISES 'f{1r825.00 +.k RAFeTY..CONSUA3'ANT i99549 FOXBORO4 / .IAG SYSTEMS f6S6 75 818TRtl}fE11T 189550 FRANCE COMPRESSOR PRODUCT $4.785.12 MECHANICAL PARTS 109551 A.F. FREY f105.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION —1o�BS2 . ,,nga In -109553 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO'. `. f6r40l.4fi / ',TRIBPNONB SERVICES' 109554 GEORGE LEECH A ASSOCIATES 51.026.19 ;INSTRUMZNT"PARTS i89555 mOM-ODMP# 169556 FRED A. HARPER $1,495.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 109557 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 5671.04 GAUGE ^`6PARTS 1D9559 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS .$2.340.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 109560 P.L. "AWN CO.. INC. f906.10' 109562 HILTI. INC. $247.94 CONNECTORS IT1 109563 MI-WAY SAFETY RENTALS INC. $1.496.00 SAFETY EQUIPMENT RENTAL x — 14"64 :.0- CA r V S CA62F 11-C .i6T7 2S IIeC1tr'd1F8AB Pi1RF8 ti 109565 DONALD D. HONOMICHL f300.D0 ' 109566 HOUSE OF BATTERIES -. f133.SB BBEATTZRIES' ; i, DISTRIBUTION C& AMCATMT-SU 109568 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STAMP $27.84 RUBBER STAMPS to 109569 IMO INDUSTRIES 5559.85 INSTRUMENT PART W 109571 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL l55.869.23 PERROU8/FERRIC CIU.OR. M.O.4-11-90.11-8-89 109572 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS t 902.76 0WPFD bpg 109574 INLAND PAPER - `2-- -- TRl}ITORTAI`BUPPLi'B9 109579 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. •'f122.5T TRUCE PARTS 109575 INTERNATIONAL SENSOR TECH. $2.339.13 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES GREAT O%Miwormp�UPPI3E8 199577. JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. f415.70 INSTRUMENT PARTS 109579 A.F. JOHNSON COMPANY $35.37 LAS SUPPLIES 109ST% OMNSTONP-SU"L* ` 49-- —BLECpRIC-TARTS 109580 KAMAN BEARINGS 6 SUPPLY 59.559.30 INSTRUMENT PARTS IG9581 KANER COMPANY $560.61 HARDWARE 6..AN A A654 RKERS-EBMP-ADMI*ISRATION-FBE 109583 KELLY SERVICES $1.596.82 TEMPORARY SERVICES 109584 KING BEARING. INC. 51.457.26 MECHANICAL PARTS —599585 I"INFK-0ER q D" -72 GE0TECHNTCRL-86RVIC88 109586 THE KNOK COMPANY $78.13 SAFETY SUPPLIES 109587 MARTIN KOROICK. SR $29242,11 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 5-35-1 i G'>SB8—A ;IRE-bcoyi ne 1A61.-54 .RueIf FARTS 109589 LEEDS f NORTHRUP $451.25 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES . 109590 LIMITOROUE CORP. $1,094.60 MECHANICAL PARTS FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9120190 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 MT, CLAIMS^"'°••AT ION OiSTRiCTS OF OR 3NGC C01{1° CLAIMS PAID 09/26/90 POSTING DATE 09/20/90 _Y.00.u. u VE 309591 N.P. LINDSTROM. INC. $7,713.57 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.30-14-07 PARTS 109593 LORAIN PRODUCTS $320.00 'SERVICE AGREEMENT 109594 NBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL. S3W919.22. „`OCEAN ARMPLING' OTDORAPNIC-SERVEGEg 109596 MAINFRAME SERVICE INC. 6480.00 INBTRUMBNT REPAIR 20959T MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS. INC. 5371.89 WATER TEST SIT 109599 MARVACELECTS 15a 87 ,RENBTRUN OCT SUPPLIES ' MATT - ELECTRONICS ,.. .328.8T �UALVER/CHLORnaTION 109600 MATT CN LOR. INC. `$8.328.78 ".;VALVES/U'U.ORINATION PARTS —L0860. ...rur •nLORS e37.^f . .PR01PPI71G 109602 MCKENNA ENSP. S EQUIP. 58.433.84 PUMP PARTS 109603 MCHASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. 51.122.23 BUILDING MATERIALS 309605 MICROABE COMPUTER $2.659. CO_COMPUTBR PARTS 72. PLOV86 PARTS 10960E MI CR OA6E COMPUTER STORES $962.62 COMPUTER SOETWARt .:9607 ANO-IFG --CORP Sl R53-3^ "(NEWS, 7GTiON ARGB 199608 MILLAR ELEVATOR SERVICE $3,911.66 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS ETI 109639 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO. $3.012.83 SAFETY SUPPLIER X IMBGTRi8 PARTS 109611 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES. - '.$4.095.00 .. "INS RUMENT P 00 Z09612 MOORE PRODUCTS CO. $152.69 ,INGTNSEREN PARTS B9614 MORGA RAN RANE RENNG-88RYi8E8 109615 MOTION•INDUS CO.. INC. S1,493.75 MECHANICAL I ATR1 pU 109615 NOTION INDUSTRIES. INC. t3.B92.39 MECNARICAL PARTS 305E46 •u C. .oe. RATTZRO-GR45 CZLLULARTELEPHO J= 109618 MOTOROAM CELLULAR SERVICES $08.63 'CELLULAR CHINE REP SERVICES 10961E MOTOR AME RICA. INC. _. SB8.6, . I OFFICEVAN---. MACHINE REPAIRS --149619ENATIONAL LUMBER CORPORA TJ ON 137.29 HAIL WARE Oy 109620 NATIONAL LUMBER "$137.29 HARDWARE 109621 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES. INC. S7.437.50 VACUUM TRUCE SERVICE 100124 NZAI-S-RRLY IO. X,-,TRRGN NP-BUPFIT , 109623 NEWARK ELECTRONICS �$10.70 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 109624 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $7.10 WATER UBRAGE —109625----------NORCAI.-CONTRO"..-M •.I46.22 MECHANICAL-PARTS- 109626 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES 5403.32 SAFETY GLASSES '109627 THE OHMART CORP. 559.65 INSTRUMENT .eg1. MILMRINE-H,0,2-44-40 109629 ORANGE BEARINO. INC. SBIS.31 HHCHANICAL PARTS 109630 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY 5403.06 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 10963� ORANGE--COUNT"UTO-RARIS- - TRUCK-PARTS -- 109632 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. $971.61 HYDROCHLORIC ACID 109633 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY CO. $118.58 GROUNDCOVER 109635 ORANGE OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY •644.75 DOOR REPAIR 109636 OXYGEN SERVICE S776.09 SPECIALTY GASSES F� 0 9299 JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE* 9120190 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 ZS OR'^CLAIMS PAID 09/26/90 POSTING GATE GRAND-9�/S6/90 BAR RAILT'•• -"DQR AMOUNT nrero.o T.n 109637 COUNTY OF ORANGE SlL742.00 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES REIMBURSES WO 9. PSSI 89.70E HEAD E6 P 1 8URANCB 30963 4 8 . MANHOLE INSPECTION DIET 11 109640 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY Q3.07B.80 r PmP PARTS -.-9640 PACIFIC PARTir TL -.9 AR INSY RUHBHT-P 109642 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. S479.18 - SAFETY SUPPLIES. 109643 PACIFIC BELL $13.55 TELEPHONE SERVICES L09641 PARTS UNLIMITEDuvro 109645 ' PEAT. MAR WICK. MAIN 6C0. - - 15.000{q0 AUDITING SERVICES"N:O'.3-9-00• ' 199646 ROY PENOERGRAFT - "$405.80 DEFERRED COMP .OT8T81BUTIOH }0960 PNYG263AN-0-BE6if REFEAENGE .54.13- FOR LICA 30964E PIMA GAS SYSTEMS. INC. $44,953.65 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-BB 109649 PLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE S639.61 HARDWARE 3006fiQ e-� .o••er .� 109651 . POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. Sbi B.22 ''ELECTRIC SUPPLIES > 109652 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $190.90 . ICE ---`a'i683--THE-^TRQJE6IS--80 TRFIMBWFATION-IS PBCTMON-NAB 10 00- 109654 PUMP ENGINEERING CO. f321.41 PUMP PARTS m 109655 QUALITY BUILDING SUPPLY S116.93 BUILDING MATERIALS BNGli BBRVIOEB _ 109657 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. �''� $ 1.08O.6 Y� TRANS ABH'DI DISPOSAL ' .109658 RATTRAP AND ASSOCIATES. INC. 'S1.9Q0.00 PHOTO SURVEYING GIST 7 i9409 RESYS ZINC "04040•^"9 BLUBOH-REMOVAL-MrB-2-10-SB -I 109660 P.A. REED ELECTRIC $746.19 ELECTRIC PARTS 109661 REMEDY TEMP $3.153.77 TEMPORARY SERVICES -6096 .. In 109663 RENULD POWER TRANSMISSION $99.68 MECHANICAL PARTS 109664 RICHARDS, WATSON 6. GERSHON �S161732.68 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.4-8-87 --109665 ROSEMONT•-ANALVi3EAL iibi aft INSTRUMENT-REPAIR 109666 ROSEMOUNT/UNILOC $526.63 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 109667 ROYCE INSTRUMENT $245.62 INSTRUMENT PART S0966B----RY'DER TA 81 RENTAk t -CREW 109669 S L Y DIESEL $80.53 TRUCK. PARTS 109670 SAFETY-NLEEN CORP. $265.68 PARTS CLEANER }09b?!' FA-ANA-BL{s gii-MOi0P8- 0050 ` BLBCTREC-CAR'tMOTOR 109672 DOUG SARVIS SSS0.06 TRAINING REGISTRATION 109673 SEA COAST DESIGNS $837.67 OFFICE SUPPLIES BAN-NONITORINO 109675 SEARS, ROEBUCK 6 CO. 5120.4E SPOOL 109676 SENSOREY. INC. $363.39 INSTRUMENT PART -I 96T7 0HAMR00R--SUPPLY "y3.43.84- TOOL 109678 SHEPHERD MACHINERY CO. S543.29 ENGINE PARTS 109679 SKYPARK VALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC S2.125.0C PHYSICAL EXAMS t8968i ---------- E*ERV 00 42-'22 In SD11rTRSTlN0-M-:9:E-14-89-- 109681 SNAP-ON TOOL! CORP. S2.769.04 TOOLS 109682 SOFT WAREHOUSE/WESTERN REGION- $513.11 COMPUTER SOFTWARE FUND NO 9199 - J7 DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/20/90 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CLAIMS PAID 09/26/90 POSTING DAT[ 09/26/9S:' nrR CRYPT in m 109683 SONNENSCHEIN. NATH S ROSENTHAL $45.688.11 LEGAL SERVICES N.0.6-13-90 1416.4 en rne.T ere W e� rrr evn_nn pamew EBAB 109685 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY - $260.00 PERMIT, EQUI 109606 SOUTH COAST WATER S97.00 , 1-00607 `.. -".CRN-CA j',MENTAy. EQUIPMENT 109688 SO. CALIF. EDISON CO. t9.054.30 REPAIR DAMAGED POWER EQUIPMENT 5-29 109689 SO. CAL. GAS CO. $554.03 NATURAL GAS 109691. S0. CALIF. ..-- CO. — 79 3 BABE-EENB^-"�"`�&r'B,a 2T ATE109692 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO.. S610.09 ,i WATSR'USSAGE A8869Y ^^UONW"T-4DI4ER946 - '➢IBA84-F0EL 1L 109694 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER t1.893.00 8WATERBCOOLERS MBN4 209695 STAMEN I. SPASSOFF. P.E. $2,640.00 DRINKING NATSERVICESR8 449"' STIR '^OL L SWRRLY C^ i -3 9 'Tee BRING SERVICES P1-30-2 ' 109697 .STERLING ART rf 5"05 fiRAPNIC WPPLI:EB 109698 SUMMIT STEEL J1.277.41 BTSBL =?SUP i99699 ^••N-tE1.T-6ANOSCARCJ •-�1.: t3.g iT 0" ESNPIW10T6ROUNDSRBBPING-11 G.8 9-09 109700 SUPER CHEM CORP $1,848.75 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES m 109701 SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS $221.00 PUBLICATION X .. _.. Z • 109703 MANIN TALESI $533.22 ]MEETING EXPENSE 109704 TAUBER ELECTRONICS $23.13 pRg=SNT ` OMf ANT eta'-11 'B'vBeniE-PJWT-PARTe . -{ 109706 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD i5.U57.52 VEHICLE LBABEB - CARGO VANS 109707 TICOR TITLE INSURANCE $600.00 TITLE INSURANCE OD RAVEL-BBWEDES 109709 H.O. TRERICE CO. $2.000.85 - INSTRUMENT NUPPLIEB CA 109710 T.S. TRIPP S525.00 - CARPETPETCLEANING —.-972i "G. TUCKER INC.'.^- 356.i9_ --TRUCRUPARTS MM 109712 J.G. TUCKER B SON. INC .967.00 SOIL PART 10971E TWINING LABORATORIES IFS OF $7.967.00 80IL TESTING N.0.6-10-89 5 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $320 Si PARCELS SERVICE 109715 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE .324.90 PASSEL PLRVICB 309716 VWR SCIENTIFIC t1.324"90 - LAB SUPPLIES —10971a VARIAN INSTRUMENT PGROUPLA CO NS2%6.09 LAB SNU 109719 VEHICL INSTRUMENT GROUP [240.09 LAB SUPPLIES 109719 VEHICLE SPRING SERVICE t50.00 TRUCK REPAIR 1.9727� VICHARD Y. VON LAL-SUN DEFENSE 109722 WEATHER W. VON LANGENINSTRUMENTS $502.32 SAFETY URILIES 109722 WEATHER 6 WINO INSTRUMENT$ t502.32 BAFBTF SUPPLIES 109724 ROURKE -6-WOOF-CHENICAIrSWPRI.: 149.872.00 LEGALISEROSE-N'.U�B-BiO-9 109725 ROURKE 8 WOODRUFF s&1.342.48 LEGAL eLRVICRB N.0.6-0-89 109T25 XEROX CORP. t1.342"48 CAST- ygpggg 97 1026 STR- PAR 109727 RICH AR One. EOG AR i - DEFERRED RED CO COMP DISTRIBUTION ----- TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 99/26/9G s2.59W.154.67 7-- .._ _.__. ._..._. _.._. .__._-__.._. i .. a Ff� �O 9199 ST,DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING BATS 49/20/90 PAGE 7 L REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAIq 26 90 POSTING PA 0 6190 SUMWARY . AMOUNT 970.53- @2,OPER FIINO t = ' gs2 SnP PAC Bucm }5ga47T '!R 'OaRR PlDln 'WfS'-S.. S' :'3.P27.514�L ` '' .S'' ` •. 5 ^. is t�;� P3 CAP FAC FUND $1,935.61 . 95 OPEN FUND $6,017.05 113,039.55 97'4 CAP FAC FUND x zt } i "'"j{21 S83 T cL B .° �t�t'_ GP R FUND q7 CAP PAC FUND i , .50 $7 qll OPER FUND i7,890890.43 C 3 1SB.11 ' 813 OPER FUND Y Viz"`' 7 •:? +. P c. 'f4t'7 r,, c 414 oezA.eulm �zzrpD . , �' Rwt1 014 P FAC FUND 37 } s f962 802 & 4566 OPER FUND $4,707.43 m g566 CAP FAC FUND $13,681.19 4 543.65 2T OPBA PUNO " to i1;209 348: CORF $52I ,743.3Tj� to SEEP FUNDED WORKERS COMP INBURANCA PONp - .920.2305'$2.'. w —i 3T DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND i228,312.97 -------------- t" L2,590,254.67 Al '77- : :^Y. '-. EXCERPT FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m. , October 10, 1990, at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present. * k Y f f 1 f t t Y ! < t rt • t �� �� ALL DISTRICTS Upon return from closed session, the Approving settlement of Case General Counsel reported on the action No. X604838, Butler Engineering, of the Boards of Directors in the Inc. vs. Count Sanitation matter of litigation entitled Butler Districts of range ounty Engineering, Inc. vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. X604838, as follows: It was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the settlement of the litigation entitled Butler Engineering, Inc. vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. X604838, by the payment of the sum of $65,000 by the Districts to Butler Engineering, Inc. in exchange for a Dismissal of Prejudice of the pending litigation and agreement of the parties of no finding nor acknowledgement of fault or responsibility by the Districts, be, and is hereby, approved. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, RITA J. BROWN, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be a full , true and correct copy of minute entries of the meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 10th day of October, 1990. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 15th day of October, 1990. Secretary of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts �/ Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 PARTIAL MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, REGARDING A CLOSED SESSION HELD ON October 9 1990 . The Board of Directors of County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California: 1. Declares that it has read (or had read to it) and discussed a cc nfidential memorandum of the General Counsel, dated October 9, 1990 submitted pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8 or 54956.9. - 2 . Finds the memorandum of the General Counsel and the facts and circumstances on which it is based to be adequate for the purpose of holding a closed session of the Board of Directors. THEREFORE, by motion duly made and seconded in open session, the Board of Directors orders that: A closed session of the Board of Directors be held for the purpose of discussing and, if necessary, taking action on the subject matter set forth in said memorandum of the General Counsel pursuant to: Government Code Section 54956.9(a). (A complaint, claim, petition for writ of mandate, or other pleading before a court, administrative body, or arbitrator, by or against the District has been filed. ) /—xx/ a. The title of the pending litigation is: County Sanitation District No. 1 y lJnivprqnl Cir nirc Tnr , Orangp Cnim t• Superior Lour[ No 599967 or b. Identifying the pending litigation would jeop- ardize the ability to effectuate service of pro- cess or would jeopardize the ability to advan- tageously conclude existing settlement negotia- tions. 2. Government Code Section 54956 .9 (b) . (In the reasonable opinion of the Board of Directors based on an existing set of specific facts and circum- stances, the threat of litigation against the District is likely or would be likely if discussed in an open and public meeting.) 3 . Government Code Section 54956 .8. (The Board of Directors may hold a closed session with its negotiator prior to or during negotiations concerning the purchase, sale, exchange, or lease of real property by or for the District to give instructions to its negotiator regarding the price and terms of payment for the purchase, sale, ex- change, or lease.) The real property or real properties which the negotiations may concern and. the person or persons with whom its negotiator may negotiate are as follows: The negotiator may also negotiate with the attorney or other representatives of the person or persons set forth above. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 19 9O, at Fountain Valley, California. CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF DIRECTORS SECRETARY, BOARD OF DIRECTORS PARTIAL MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, REGARDING A CLOSED SESSION HELD ON October 9 1990_. The Board of Directors of County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California : 1. Declares that it has read (or had read to it) and discussed a confidential memorandum of the General Counsel, dated October 9. 1990 , submitted pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8 or 54956.9. 2. Finds the memorandum of the General Counsel and the facts and circumstances on which it is based to be adequate for the purpose of holding a closed session of the Board of Directors. THEREFORE, by motion duly made and seconded in open session, the Board of Directors orders that: A closed session of the Board of Directors be held for the purpose of discussing and, if necessary, taking action on the subject matter set forth in said memorandum of the General Counsel pursuant to: 1. Government Code Section 54956.9(a). (A complaint, claim, petition for writ of mandate, or other pleading before a court, administrative body, or arbitrator, by or against the District has been f it ad. ) /-M/ a. The title of the pending litigation is: Burg E ineeri Inc. v. Count Sanitation Districts actGe unty Superior Court No. AbU46m ; or b. Identifying the pending litigation would jeop- ardize the ability to effectuate service of pro- cess or would jeopardize the ability to advan- tageously conclude existing settlement negotia- tions. 2. Government Code Section 54956 .9 (b ) . (In the reasonable opinion of the Board of Directors based on an existing set of specific facts and circum- stances, the threat of litigation against the District is likely or would be likely if discussed in an open and public meeting.) 3. Government Code Section 54956 .8. (The Board of Directors may hold a closed session with its negotiator prior to or during negotiations �✓ concerning the purchase, sale, exchange, or lease of real property by or for the District to give instructions to its negotiator regarding the price and terms of payment for the purchase , sale, ex- change, or lease.) The real property or real properties which the negotiations may concern and the person or persons with whom its negotiator may negotiate are as follows: The negotiator may also negotiate with the attorney or other representatives of the person or persons set forth above. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 19 90 , at Fountain Valley, California. CRAIRNAN, BOARD OF DIRECTORS SECRETARY, BOARD OF DIRECTORS a STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954 .2, I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting on O , 19 CIO was duly posted for public inspection at the main lobby of the Districts - offices on y 190. IN WITNESS '' WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 4 day of PACV-A-J� 1990 . Rita�w�n, Secretary each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 , 11 , 13 6 14 of Orange County, California ti./