HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-09-12 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O.BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272M127
10844 ELLIS,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-T818
°•+cc<o (114)962-2411
September 6, 1990
NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICTS NOS, 1, 2, 3, S, 6, 7, 11, 13 8 14
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1990 - 7:30 P.M.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Has. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of
Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and
date.
ecra ar
Tentatively-Scheduled Upcoming Meetings:
DISTRICT NO. 2 - Wednesday, September 19th, at 4: 30 p.m.
SELECTION COMMITTEE
DIRECTORS- WORKSHOP RE - Wednesday, September 19th, at 5: 30 p.m.
DEBT FINANCING
FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - Thursday, September 20th, at 5: 30 p.m.
JOINT WORKS SELECTION - Wednesday, September 26th, at 4:30 p.m.
COMMITTEE
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday, September 26th, at 5 : 30 p.m.
CONSERVATION, - Thursday, September 27th, at 5: 30 p.m.
RECLAMATION. AND REUSE
COMMITTEE
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
AI ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
I084A Ews AVENUE
VD Box 01E7 111
FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92�
(7141962-2411
JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES
Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings
September Sep 12, 1990 Sep 26 , 1990
October Oct 10, 1990 Oct 24, 1990
November Nov 14, 1990 None Scheduled
December Dec 12, 1990 None Scheduled
January Jan 09, 1991 Jan 23 , 1991
February Feb 13, 1991 Feb 27 , 1991
March Mar 13, 1991 Mar 27, 1991
April Apr 10, 1991 Apr 24, 1991
May May 08, 1991 May 29, 1991
June Jun 12, 1991 Jun 26, 1991
July Jul 10, 1991 Jul 24, 1991
August Aug 14 , 1991 None Scheduled
September Sep 11 , 1991 Sep 25 , 1991
`�LI
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanaaaon DIddets P.O. Box 8127 a 10844 Sfis Avenue
of Oranye County,CalBomlo Fountaln Valley,CA 927284127
Telephone:(714)962-2411
JOINT BOARDS
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
SEPTEMBER 12, 1990 - 7:30 P.M.
In accor ance a e requ remen s of California Government
Code section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72
hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written
materials relating to each agenda item are available for public
inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary.
In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is
proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or
action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2, or
as set forth on a supplemental agendaposted not less than 72
hours prior to the meeting date.
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll call
(3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary
(4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts
of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if
any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders)
(5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards
on specific agenda items or matters of general interest
should do so at this time. As determined by the Chairman,
speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken
for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes.
(6) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel
present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general
interest to the Directors. These reports are for
information only and require no action by the Directors.
(a) Report of Joint Chairman
(b) Report of General Manager
(c) Report of General Counsel
9/12/90
(7) EACH DISTRICT
ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the
following minutes will be deemed approved as
mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman:
District 1 - August 8, 1990 regular
District 2 - August 8, 1990 regular
District 3 - August 8, 1990 regular
District 5 - August 8, 1990 regular
District 6 - August 8, 1990 regular
District 7 - August 8, 1990 regular
District 11 - August 8, 1990 regular
District 13 - July 11, 1990 regular, and
August 8, 1990 regular
District 14 - August 8, 1990 regular
(8) ALL DISTRICTS
Con�eon of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of
claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows:
(Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will
be regarded as the same for each District represented unless
a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any
District. ) See pages "A" B. C. and "D"
7/04/90 7/18/90
DISTRICT NO. 13
(Carrie over rom 8/OB/90 Mtg. ) -0- e5.00
8/01/90 8/15/90 8/29/90
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Opera Sng Fund - $ 1,070,523.05 $ 691,508.67 $ 923,796.92
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 7,678,772.93 180,397.13 7,027, 301.19
Joint Working Capital Fund - 133,149.36 129,677.93 162,306. 31
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 196,040.66 9,792.72 12,781.28
DISTRICT NO. 1 - 34.77 -0- 1,085.63
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 217,793.46 167,018.66 8,289.84
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 216,850.54 15,729.01 594,675.17
DISTRICT WO-.5 - 694,908.69 28,569.57 250, 352.81
DISTRICT NO. 6 - 830.36 182.00 27.84
DISTRICT NO. 7 - 197,496.78 16,149.46 52,353.73
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 97.06 13,081. 38 639.09
DISTRICT NO. 13 - -0- . -0- -0-
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 127,842.12 16,659. 39 142,608.22
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 fi 6 JOINT - 3,679.87 -0- 4,901.43
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 fi 7 JOINT - 3,589.59 -0- 32.10
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 fi 14 JOINT 5,382.92 8.92 3,919.F'
$10,546,992, 6 $1,268,774.84 $9,185,070.1 J
-2-
9/12/90
(9) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 9(a) THROUGH 9(1)
All matters placed on the consent calendar are
considered as not requiring discussion or further
explanation and unless any particular item is
�a..i requested to be removed from the consent calendar by
a Director, staff member, or member of the public in
attendance, there will be no separate discussion of
these items. All items on the consent calendar will
be enacted by one action approving all motions, and
casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included
on the consent calendar. All items removed from the
consent calendar shall be considered in the regular
order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item
from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by
the chair, state their name, address and designate
by letter the item to be removed from the consent
calendar.
The Chairman will determine if any items are to be
deleted from the consent calendar.
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items
appearing on the consent calendar not specifically
removed from same, as follows:
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 1 to the plans and specifications for
Installation of Replacement Influent Meters, Job
No. J-24, authorizing an addition of $18,227. 37
to the contract with P. R. Burke Industrial
Corporation for two items of additional work.
See page "E°
(b) Consideration of the following actions relative
to Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related
Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-33:
(1) Consideration of motion approving Change
Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications
for said project, authorizing an addition of
$87,272.00 to the contract with Gust R.
Newberg Construction Company for four items
of additional work, and granting a time
extension of six calendar days for
completion of said additional work. See
page IF.
(2) Consideration of motion approving Change
Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications
for said project, authorizing an addition of
$608,121.00 (to be paid by Orange County
Water District) to the contract with Gust R.
Newberg Construction Company for one item of
additional work, and granting a time
extension of eight calendar days for
completion of said additional work. See
page "G"
-3-
9/12/90
(9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(c) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 4 to the plans and specifications for Sludge
Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1 ,
Job No. P1-34-2, authorizing an addition of
$58,066 .57 to the contract with Advanco
Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc.
for eight items of additional work. See page
"H"
(d) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection
Committee to negotiate a Professional Services
Agreement with X. P. Lindstrom, Inc. for
environmental consulting services to assist staff
on NPDES Permit activities; regulatory and
legislative liaison activities; and for technical
support for sludge management, air quality,
reclamation and conservation issues and in
connection with CEQA compliance for Master Plan
projects.
(a) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-117, approving
Professional Services Agreement with Gordon W.
Hoyt for specialized consulting engineering and
negotiating services to assist staff in
negotiating a rate structure agreement with
Southern California Edison Company in connection
with the Districts' new Central Power Generation
Systems at Plants 1 and 2, on an hourly-rate
basis, for a total fee not to exceed $50 ,000.00
plus out-of-pocket expenses. See page "I"
(f) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-118,
pertaining to the procedure for destruction of
obsolete records and repealing the inconsistent
provisions of all other resolutions previously
adopted by these Boards of Directors with respect
to destruction of obsolete records. See page
„J„
(g) Consideration of motion authorizing renewal of
membership in the Santa Ana River Flood
Protection Agency (SARFPA) for fiscal year
1990-91; and authorizing payment of membership
dues in the amount of $1,400.00.
(h) Consideration of Resolution No 90-133, amending
Classification and Compensation Resolution
No. 79-20, amended, re management and supervisory
salary range adjustments.
-4-
.H (9) DISTRICT 2 - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) 9/12/90
(i) Consideration of the following actions relative
to Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services
Agreement with Willdan Associates for design of
Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between
\� Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract
No. 2-26-3 (including City of Anaheim Street
Improvements) , and Katella Relief Sewer, between
Euclid Street and Walnut Street (Ninth) , Contract
No. 2-28, providing for additional design
services necessary to incorporate changes
recommended by CALTRANS and the Cities of Anaheim
and Fullerton, and for other miscellaneous
changes required re Contract No. 2-26-3: ..
(1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and
approve the Selection Committee Certification
of the final negotiated fee for said
additional services. See page "K"
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-128-2,
approving Addendum No. 2 to the agreement
with Willdan Associates for said additional
services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor
plus overhead, plus direct expenses and
fixed profit, for an additional amount not
to exceed $51,500.00, increasing the total
authorized compensation from $145,578.50 to
an amount not to exceed $197,078.50. See
page "L"
DISTRICT 7
(j ) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-134-7,
ordering annexation of 28.735 acres of territory
to the District in the vicinity of the northwest
corner of Santiago Canyon Road and Windes Drive
in unincorporated County territory (Annexation
No. 134 - Southwest Diversified Annexation to
County Sanitation District No. 7) . See page
"N"
(k) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-135-7,
ordering annexation of 2.50 acres of territory to
the District in the vicinity of the southeast
corner of Lemon Heights Drive and Lower Lake
Drive in unincorporated County territory
(Annexation No. 135 - Williams Annexation to
County Sanitation District No. 7) . See page
"N"
(1) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-136-7,
ordering annexation of 2.905 acres of territory
to the District in the vicinity of Cowan Heights
Drive and Overbill Drive in unincorporated County
territory (Annexation No. 138 - Gable Annexation
to County Sanitation District No. 7) . See page
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
(10) ALL DISTRICTS
�✓ Consi era ion of action on items deleted from Consent
Calendar, if any,
-5-
9/12/90
(11) ALL DISTRICTS
Consi era ion of the following actions relative, to approval
of new master-planned treatment plant construction projects:
(a) Verbal staff report
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-115, approving plans
and specifications for Central Power Generation System
at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, and authorizing the
General Manager to establish the date for receipt of
bids. See page I.P.
(c) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-116, approving plans
and specifications for Construction of Digesters
Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-3
and Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation
Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-2, and authorizing the
General Manager to establish the date for receipt of
bids. See page
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
Consi ,ration of the following actions relative to Supplement
No. 1 to Program Environmental Impact Report for Collection,
Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan re interplant
Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9: (Copy of Draft
Supplement No. 1 and Staff Report enclosed with Directors'
agenda material)
(a) Verbal staff report
(b) Consideration of motion to receive and file comments
received on the Notice of Preparation of Supplement
No. 1 to said EIR.
(c) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report
dated September 5, 1990 and Draft Supplement No. 1 to
said EIR.
(d) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager
to file a Notice of Completion of Draft Supplement No. 1
to said EIR.
(a) Consideration of motion fixing October 10, 1990, at
7:30 p.m. , at the Districts' Administrative Office, as
the date, time and place for public hearing on Draft
Supplement No. 1 to said EIR.
(f) Consideration of motion establishing October 10, 1990 as
the final date for which all comments must be received
on Draft Supplement No. 1 to said EIR.
(13) DISTRICTS 1,2 3 5,6,7 6 11
Cons era on of the following resolutions creating a
1990 Construction Fund in each respective District: See
page "R-
District Resolution No.
1 90-120-1
2 90-121-2
3 90-122-3
5 90-123-5
6 90-124-6 `a►'
7 90-125-7
11 90-126-11
-6-
• y
9/12/90
(14) ALL DISTRICTS
Closed Session: During the course of conducting the
sineu�ss sef-Torth on this agenda as a regular
meeting of the Boards, the Chairman may convene the
Boards in closed session to consider matters of
�../ pending or potential litigation, or personnel
matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9
or 54957.6.
Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real
property; (b) matters of pending or potential
litigation; (c) employee compensation; or which are
exempt from public disclosure under the California
Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards
during a permitted closed session and are not
available for public inspection. At such time as
final actions are taken by the Directors on any of
these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required
disclosures of information.
(a) Convene in closed session, if necessary
(b) Reconvene in regular session
(c) Consideration of action, if any, an matters considered
in closed session.
(15) ALL DISTRICTS
other businiss and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(16) DISTRICT 1
o er slnesa and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(17) DISTRICT 1
Con�tion of motion to adjourn
(18) DISTRICT 5
orier �s loess and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(19) DISTRICT 5
Con— s�tion of motion to adjourn
(20) DISTRICT 13
(CARRIED OVER FROM 8/08/90 BOARD MEETING DUE TO LACK OF
QUORUM IN DISTRICT 13)
Consideration of Resolution No. 90-109-13, establishing
1990-91 charges for Class I, Class II and Class III
permittees, pursuant to provisions of the uniform
ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District
Sewerage Facilities, as follows: See page "S.,
1990-91 INDUSTRIAL USER RATES
Class I 6 II Fee Class III Fee
Dist. No. Resolution No. Flow(-) S.S. (*) B.O.D. (*) Flow(*)
13 90-109-13 $430.64 $154.58 $120.98 $1,005.17
*Flow - Per million gallons of flow
*S.S. - Per thousand pounds of suspended solids
*B.O.D. - Per thousand pounds of biochemical oxygen demand
-7-
(21) DISTRICT 13 9/12/90 P _i
O er s neas and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(22) DISTRICT 13
Consi era Son of motion to adjourn 1 ,
(23) DISTRICT 2 `..�
Con�deration of the following actions relative to a Portion
of Euclid Interceptor, between Broadway and Orangethorpe
Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-3 (including City of Anaheim Street
Improvements); %atella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street
and Walnut Street (Ninth Street) , Contract No. 2-28; and
Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29:
(a) verbal staff report
(b) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for said projects clarifying
traffic requirements and bonus/penalty provisions.
(C) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-127-2, receiving and
filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding
contract for said project to Steve Bubalo Construction
Co. in the total amount of 07,953,755.00. See page
T"
(2-1) DISTRICT 2
OfEer -6 siness and communications or supplemental agenda
Stems, if any
(25) DISTRICT 2
Cone eration of motion to adjourn
(26) DISTRICTS 3 a 11
Cons era on of the following actions re master-planned
sewage system improvements:
(a) verbal staff report
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-129, approving
revised Agreement between County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 3 and 11 providing for financing, design,
construction, capacity ownership and operations of
certain master-planned sewage collection facilities for
serving Districts 3 and 11; and rescinding Resolution
No. 90-53 adopted by the Boards on May 9, 1990. See
page U.
(c) Consideration of the following actions relative to
Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement
with John Carollo Engineers for preparation of Phase I
Preliminary Project Report for Slater Avenue Pump
Station Sewage System Improvements, providing for final
design of Contract No. 11-17 and construction support
services re said project:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and
approve the Selection Committee Certification of
the final negotiated fee for said services. See
page V.
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-130, approving
Addendum No. 1 to said Agreement with John Carollo
Engineers for said additional services, on an
hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus
direct expenses and fixed profit, for an additional
amount not to exceed $649,383.00, increasing the l
total authorized compensation from $44,730.00 to an �y
amount not to exceed $694,121,00. See page I.W.
-8-
a
9/12/90
(27) DISTRICT 3
Ofher- uussiness and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(28) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(29 ) DISTRICT 11
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
( 30) DISTRICT 11
Con ration of motion to adjourn
( 31) DISTRICTS 6 7 S 14
Cons deration of the following actions relative to the
Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1 ,
Contract No. 14-1-1A:
(a) verbal report of General Counsel
(b) Consideration of motion to receive and file Memorandum
from General Counsel dated September 5, 1990. See
page X.
(c) Consideration of motion to receive and file Petition for
Writ of Mandate and Application for Injunctive Relief,
Mesa Verde Country Club vs. County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California, Case No. 634680, relative
to compliance with CEQA requirements in connection with
Districts' approval of Supplement No. 1 to the EIR for
Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14
and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving
Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13, required to
assess the impacts resulting from the final designed
alignment of Contract Nos. 14-1-1A, 14-1-1B and 14-1-2;
and authorize the Districts' General Counsel to appear
and defend the interests of the Districts.
(d) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-131, pertaining to
setting the time and place for a public hearing on the
adoption of a Resolution of Necessity to order the
acquisition of certain property by eminent domain
required in connection with the Baker-Gisler
Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1 , Contract
No. 14-1-1A (Hearing Date: October 10, 1990, at
7 : 30 p.m. , at the Districts' Administrative Office) .
See page Y.
( 32) DISTRICT 6
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
( 33) DISTRICT 6
Con�eration of motion to adjourn
-9-
9/12/901' -'
( 34) DISTRICTS 7 6 14
Considerationof the following actions relative to the
Baker Force Mains, from Main Street Pump Station to
Bristol Street, Contract No. 14-1-2:
(a) verbal staff report
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-132, approving
plans and specifications for Baker Force Mains, from
Main Street Pump Station to Bristol Street, Contract
No. 14-1-2, and authorizing the General Manager to
establish the date for receipt of bids (tentative bid
date is October 16, 1990) . See page "Z"
( 35) DISTRICT 7
O—E eeriness and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
( 36 ) DISTRICT 7
Cons eraation of motion to adjourn
( 37) DISTRICT 14
Offer mess and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
( 38) DISTRICT 14
Con�Me—ration of motion to adjourn
-10- ,//
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127.40844 Ellis Avenue
of Orange County.California Fountain Valley.CA 92 728-81 2 7
Telephone:(714) 962-2411
JOINT BOARDS
MEETING DATE
September 12, 1990 at 7:30 a.m.
The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine
items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise
self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material
summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting.
ALL DISTRICTS
9(a) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO INSTALLATION OF REPLACEMENT INFLUENT
METERS. JOB NO. J-24.
Job No. J-24, Installation of Replacement Influent Meters, includes the
installation of twelve Districts' furnished flowmeters with associated piping,
fourteen Districts' furnished flowmeter signal converters, and two flow
monitoring computer systems with associated electrical and instrumentation
wiring, at a cost of $214,464.00. The metering equipment serves two purposes.
It allows for the calculation of flows from the respective Districts to enable
allocation of joint construction and operating costs; and also enables
calculation of our effluent mass discharges to determine compliance with our
NPDES permit requirements. Change Order No. 1 adds $18,227.37 to the contract.
Item 1, in the amount of $16,947.63, is for the replacement of two
concentric reducers and two 42-inch couplings on the Miller-Holder Trunk at
Treatment Plant No. 2. The contract documents specify that the existing
reducers and couplings are to be reused. However, after dismantling these parts
it was determined that these reducers cannot be reused without major rework,
costing as much as replacement, nor would they allow for easy removal for future
maintenance service. The new reducers and couplings will allow future removal
of the Miller-Holder meter without cutting the couplings.
Item 2, in the amount of $1,279.74, is for the installation of a
Districts' furnished computer in the existing Control Center at Plant 1. The
computer was originally to be installed in the new Control Center when it is
completed. However, construction of the new Control Center has been postponed
and is not expected to be completed until early 1992.
September 12, 1990'
The above-described changes are considered by staff to be corrections
which would have been included in the original design if discovered or known
prior to its completion. None of the items are for replaced work.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 for an addition of
$18,227.37 to the contract with P. R. Burke Industrial Corporation. There is no
time extension associated with this change order.
9(b) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDERS NOS. 4 AND 5 TO PRIMARY CLARIFIERS NOS. 6-15
AND RELATED FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-33.
Job No. P1-33, Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at
Reclamation Plant No. 1, includes the construction of a new 60 mgd primary
treatment facility and a new large diameter effluent piping network at a cost of
$39.7 million, the largest single project ever awarded by the Districts.
(1) Change Order No. 4
Change Order No. 4 adds $87,272.00 for four items of work and
adds a six-day time extension to the contract.
Item 1, in the amount of $1,955.00, is for additional supports
required at four pumps in the two temporary Waste Sidestream Pump
Stations. The added supports are necessary to stabilize pumps
during start-up and shutdown operations. These additions were
required to allow for proper pump operations and were not shown on
the contract drawings. Item 2, in the amount of $3,098.00, is for
extra costs incurred for additional conductors needed for the
two-speed scrubber fan motor. Item 3, in the amount of $56,450.00,
is for the addition of 22 precast concrete foundation piles at the
future location of Secondary Effluent Junction Box (SEJB) No. 3.
The construction of SUB No. 3 will be incorporated in a future
project and will be located directly over the two 108-inch diameter
RCP pipes installed under this project. Installation of foundation
piles at this time will eliminate the possibility of any damage to
the RCP pipeline from future pile driving operations. Item 4, in
the amount of $25,769.00, is to provide and install additional PVC
(polyvinyl chloride) liner and waterstop in the south wall sections
of the scum gallery. The outside of these walls will be an integral
part of the future clarifiers and require these additions to ensure
maximum corrosion protection and hydraulic tightness of the gallery
from future flows. This item also includes a six-day time extension
to the contract due to the additional time required to perform this
work in conjunction with the specified contract work.
The above-described changes are considered by staff to be
corrections which would have been included in the original design if
discovered or known prior to its completion. None of the items is
for replaced work.
(2) Change Order No. 5
Change Order No. 5 adds $608,121.00 (to be paid by the Orange
County Water District) for one item of work and adds eight days to V
the contract.
-2-
September 12, 1990
The original contract provided for installation of pipelines
for the Orange County Water District (OCWD) Water Facility No. 21,
under a separate reimbursable bid item. The piping relates to
servicing of OCWD relative to the cooperative program between the
Sanitation Districts and OCWD for water reclamation. OCWD has
requested piping modifications and additions to the original
contract requirements. The first of the four proposed pipelines
will carry waste brine from OCWD to the contract specified Primary
Effluent Distribution Box. The second pipeline is a replacement
gravity sewer which will extend from OCWD's research laboratories
and miscellaneous treatment plant drains to the contract specified
Waste Sidestream Pump Station. The effluent will require treatment
and flows will be monitored through a metering manhole included in
this change. Also in this item the third pipeline which is an
extension of the contract specified 48-inch supply line to OCWD and
the last proposed pipeline which is a temporary line to assist OCWD
with minimizing down time during the removal of the existing brine
line. This item also includes an eight-day time extension to the
contract due to the additional time required to perform this work.
All of the costs for the above mentioned additions and
modifications will be reimbursed to OCSD by OCWD.
Staff recommends approval of Change Orders Nos. 4 and 5 for an addition
of $695,393.00 and a 14-day time extension to the contract with Gust K. Newberg
Construction Company.
9(c) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 TO SLUDGE HANDLING FACILITIES AT
RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO, P1-34-2.
This $19.4 million project includes the construction of a new'sludge
handling and truck loading facility, a new plant water pump station and power
distribution building, the construction of a new 12 KV service center and minor
improvements to existing sludge handling facilities. Change Order No. 4 adds
eight items of work and $58,066.57 to the contract.
Item 1, in the amount of $4,187.21, provides for the fabrication of
modified standby generator area cable trench covers. Material originally
specified for the trench covers is no longer available in the industry. Item 2,
In the amount of $1,967.58, provides for the modification and relocation of an
access ladder in a utility tunnel that interfered with the installation of new
24-inch plant water piping. Item 3, in the amount of $9,952.00, provides for
additional potholing of critical areas of the site to uncover underground
utility interferences to avoid damages. Item 4, in the amount of $7,404.56,
provides for underground pipe encasement modifications at the plant water pump
station and the sludge storage facility to be tied to the building base slab to
eliminate differential settlement.
Item 5, in the amount of $6,131.90, provides for the installation of ball
valves in high pressure air lines at sludge cake transfer pump installations,
inadvertently omitted from the plan detail , to provide a means to isolate
equipment for maintenance activities. Item 6, in the amount of $18,758.11,
provides for the modification and temporary support of the existing belt press
�../ filtrate line at the new sludge storage facility. It was necessary to keep the
line in service during the construction rather than demolishing it as called out
-3-
September 12, 1990
in the original plans. Item 7, in the amount of $2,930.20, provides for the
repair of a 4-inch natural gas line in the vicinity of new junction box "B" that
was not shown on the contract drawings and was damaged by the contractor during
excavation work. Item 7 also provides for the relocation of Orange County Water
District electrical manhole in the same area (the cost of which will be billed
to the Water District) . Item 8, in the amount of $6,735.82, provides for the
change in size and quantity of flexible pipe coupling restraint rods. The size
and quantity called out in the original schedule for larger size plant water
piping was inadequate to restrain joints.
The above-described changes would have been included in the original
design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items are for
replacement work.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 4 for an addition of
$58,066.57 to the contract with Advanco Constructors. There is no time
extension associated with this change order.
9(d) : AUTHORIZING SELECTION COMMITTEE TO NEGOTIATE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH K. P. LINDSTROM. INC. RE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING
SERVICES.
Over the past several years, K. P. Lindstrom, Inc. has assisted the
Districts with many environmental issues including preparation of Environmental
Impact Reports, technical reports supporting our 301(h) ocean discharge permit
applications, preparation of the Districts' California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines Manual of Practice, and other environmental support activities
on an as-needed basis. K. P. Lindstrom, Inc. provided extensive environmental
review of our recently completed 30-year Master Plan and EIR. Staff has been
very pleased with the work the company has done for the Districts in the past.
The 1989 Master Plan has identified several projects which will require
additional environmental and technical activities in order to secure the
necessary regulatory agency permits. The Districts' ocean discharge permit
application is currently being reviewed by the EPA and K. P. Lindstrom, Inc.,
under separate authority, has been providing technical support in response to
questions posed by EPA staff, as well as acting as a liaison for regulatory and
legislative activities affecting the permit. The firm's services are also
needed to provide support on air quality, sludge management, water reclamation
and conservation issues, as well as reviewing CEQA documents supporting our
master plan projects.
Staff is, therefore, recommending that the Selection Committee be
authorized to negotiate a professional services agreement with K. P. Lindstrom,
Inc. for continuing environmental consulting services. Following the Selection
Committee's negotiations, the proposed agreement will be presented to the Boards
for consideration.
9(e) : AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT WITH GORDON W. HOYT FOR CONSULTING
ENGINEERING/NEGOTIATING SERVICES RE RATE STRUCTURE CONTRACT WITH SCE.
The Districts are in the process of installing new Central Power
Generation Systems at both treatment plants that will utilize digester gas, a
by-product of the sewage treatment process, as a fuel to generate electricity to
operate our treatment plants. The new systems will supply almost all of the
electrical .power needed to operate our facilities.
-4-
September 12, 1990
Because of the changeover from Southern California Edison (SCE) power to
self-generated power, it is necessary to negotiate a rate structure contract
with SCE. The contract may also include provisions for back-up power supply
from Edison, appropriate credits for capacity and energy produced by the Central
Power Generation Systems, and for the sale of surplus energy generated by our
systems.
Such contracts are very complex and neither staff nor the General Counsel
have the necessary background or expertise needed to negotiate such an
agreement. We have therefore solicited a proposal from Mr. Gordon W. Hoyt to
provide consulting engineering and negotiating services to assist the staff and
General Counsel in negotiating a contract with SCE, and to also assist in
presenting the Districts' position on SCE rate proceedings before the California
Public Utilities Commission, if needed. Mr. Hoyt is uniquely qualified for this
work. He recently retired after 25 years as the General Manager of the City of
Anaheim's Public Utility Department (which operates it's own electrical utility)
and his credentials are numerous.
Staff and General Counsel are recommending authorization to execute a
professional services agreement with Mr. Hoyt for the above-described services,
on an hourly-rate basis (currently $100/hour) in a total amount not to exceed
$50,000.00, plus out-of-pocket costs.
9(f) : ADOPTING RECORDS RETENTION/DESTRUCTION POLICY.
For some time the Districts' staff and General Counsel have been
reviewing and drafting a new policy pertaining to the retention of records and
the destruction of obsolete records. Attached to the supporting agenda material
is a draft resolution establishing a policy and procedures for destruction of
obsolete records and repealing any inconsistent provisions of all other
resolutions previously adopted by the Boards with respect to destruction of
records.
The policy basically allows destruction of all named records after the
time period specified; allows for immediate destruction of any original
documents after they have been microfilmed; provides for destruction of
duplicate records; and requires that records not specified in the resolution be
retained indefinitely.
Staff and General Counsel recommend adoption of the resolution.
9(g) : 1990-91 SARFPA MEMBERSHIP.
The Districts have participated as a member of the Santa Ana River Flood
Protection Agency for a number of years. The membership is made up of public
agencies in the Santa Ana River flood plain. The purpose of the organization is
to promote the improvement of flood protection facilities along the river, which
parallels our two treatment plants.
Staff recommends our continued participation. The Districts' dues for
1990-91 are $1,400.00.
-5-
September 12, 1990
9(h) : RESOLUTION FIXING MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISORY SALARIES.
At the regular August Joint Board Meeting, the Directors approved the
Executive Committee's recommended salary adjustments for management and
supervisory classifications. Adoption of Resolution No. 90-133 will formally
fix the previously approved salaries.
DISTRICT 2
9(i) : RECEIVE AND FILE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND APPROVE ADDENDUM
NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WILLDAN ASSOCIATES FOR
PORTION OF EUCLID INTERCEPTOR SEWER. CONTRACT NO. 2-26-3. AND KATELLA
RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-28.
In September 1988, the Directors awarded a professional services
agreement for preparation of plans and specifications for the final reach of the
new Euclid Interceptor sewer system, beginning at Broadway in the City of
Anaheim and extending northerly to Orangethorpe Avenue in the City of Fullerton.
The contract was amended in November 1989 to provide for alignment changes
requested by the City of Fullerton, the inclusion of local sewers and the
abandonment of an old sewer.
In the last few months, there were several changes which impacted the
scope of work for this project, including several alignment studies necessary
for the crossing of the Santa Ana Freeway required by CALTRANS as part of the
repair of the existing Euclid Trunk Sewer at the Santa Ana Freeway. Additional
design was also required and a considerable public information effort was
necessary to secure project concurrence. In August, the Directors authorized
negotiation of Addendum No. 2 to reflect this additional work.
The Selection Committee has negotiated Addendum No. 2 to the Professional
Services Agreement with Willdan Associates for the additional services on an
hourly-rate basis including labor and overhead, plus direct expenses and fixed
profit, for the additional contract amount of $51,500.00, as. follows:
Proposed
Existing Proposed Amended
Agreement Addn. No. 2 Agreement
Engineering services,
including direct labor plus
overhead at 170%, not to
exceed $107,580.00 $43,000.00 $150,580.00
Direct expenses, not to exceed 19,010.00 4,200.00 23,210.00
Fixed profit 18,988.50 4,300.00 23,288.50
$145,578.50 $51,500.00 $197,078.50
The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection
Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above additional
work and adoption of a resolution approving Addendum No. 2 to the Professional
Services Agreement with Willdan Associates. Copies of the certification and
resolution are attached with the agenda supporting documents.
-6-
September 12, 1990
DISTRICT 7
9(j) : ORDERING ANNEXATION 134--SOUTHWEST DIVERSIFIED ANNEXATION TO COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7.
This 28.735-acre annexation is for 30 single family residences located in
the vicinity of the northwest corner of the intersection of Santiago Canyon Road
and Windes Drive in unincorporated County territory. The local sewering agency
is the City of Orange.
The annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated
agreement with the County of Orange re AB 8 tax exchanges for annexing
properties.
Staff recommends approval of the resolution attached to the agenda
material ordering Annexation No. 134.
9(k) : ORDERING ANNEXATION 135--WILLIAMS ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT NO. 7.
This 2.50-acre annexation is for one single family residence currently
under construction, with the possibility of another in the future, located in
the vicinity of the southeast corner of the intersection of Lemon Heights Drive
and Lower Lake Drive in unincorporated County territory. The local sewering
agency is County Sanitation District No. 7.
The annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated
agreement with the County of Orange re AB 8 tax exchanges for annexing
properties.
Staff recommends approval of the resolution attached to the agenda
material ordering Annexation No. 135.
9(1) : ORDERING ANNEXATION NO. 138--GABLE ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT NO. 7.
This 2.905-acre annexation is for three single-family residences in the
vicinity of Cowan Heights Drive and Overhill Drive in unincorporated County
territory. The local sewering agency is the City of Orange.
The annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated
agreement with the County of Orange re AB 8 tax exchanges for annexing
properties.
Staff recommends approval of the resolution attached to the agenda
material ordering Annexation No. 138.
ALL DISTRICTS
11: ACTIONS RE APPROVAL OF NEW TREATMENT PLANT CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.
(a) Verbal Staff Report.
Staff will give a brief overview of the projects at the meeting.
-7-
September 12, 1990
(b) Approve Plans and Specifications for Central Power Generation System
at Plant No. 1. Job No. J-19-1.
The plans and specifications for the construction of the
Central Generation Facilities at Plant No. 1 are now complete. This
project is one of several phases of work for Central Power
Generation Systems at both treatment plants which started in 1984
with the preparation of a digester gas utilization study. Central
Power Generation Systems evolved through studies and consultations
with Directors, regulatory agencies and various consultants into a
project which will fully utilize the energy value of the Districts'
digester gas, a by-product of sewage treatment. The system will
utilize this fuel in new state-of-the-art, clean-burn internal
combustion engines used to power generators which will produce
electricity used on-site to operate the treatment plants. When
completed, the generated power will have an estimated value of about
$9 million per year and will almost fully offset purchases of power
from Southern California Edison.
The Directors have also previously approved an equipment
purchase contract for the engines and generators at a cost of $20
million providing five engine generator sets at Plant No. 2, and
three sets for Plant No. 1. A $19.7 million contract for
installation of the system at the Huntington Beach Treatment Plant
was awarded in February. This project, Job No. J-19-1, is for the
construction of the facilities to house the engines and distribute
the power and heat at the Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant.
This construction project will install the three 12-cylinder,
spark-ignited, internal combustion engines, one of which is
stand-by, each rated at 2-1/2 megawatts. Each engine weighs 250,000
pounds and is 20 feet long, 14 feet high, and 10 feet wide.
(Special equipment is used to transport these units from a railhead
located in Huntington Beach to the Districts' facilities to be
installed under this contract.) Also included in this contract is
modification of the electrical distribution system to allow the
central generation facilities to power all parts of the plant. To
enhance the efficiency of the system, the project includes recovery
of all heat from the engines in the form of steam to produce both
additional electricity as well as hot water for heating digesters.
It also includes process systems for chilled and hot water used for
heating and cooling existing and future office and laboratory
buildings.
Plans and specifications have been completed by Brown and
Caldwell for Job No. J-19-1, Central Power Generation System at
Plant No. 1, and all required permits have been received. Staff
recommends approval of plans and specifications and authorization
for the General Manager to establish the bid date for Job No.
J-19-1. The bid date will be established based on the upcoming debt
financing program determinations.
The engineer's estimate for this work is $16,000,000.
-8-
September 12, 1990
(c) Approve Plans and Specifications for Construction of Digesters Nos.
I1-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-34-3. and
Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation Plant No. 1. Job
No. P1-35-2.
As part of the master plan program to maintain and increase
treatment capacity at Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley, the Directors
have authorized a series of projects to provide additional primary
treatment (Job No. P1-33, a $39.7 million contract now under
construction); construct new sludge facilities (Job No. P1-34-2, a
$19.4 million contract also under construction); and new digester
gas facilities (Job No. P1-34-1, a $13.1 million contract also in
construction) . Additionally, four digesters have been rehabilitated
under two completed contracts. Increased secondary treatment
capacity is now under design also.
Plans and specifications for the construction of six new sludge
digesters (Job No. P1-34-3) and the rehabilitation of the two
remaining older digesters (Job No. P1-35-2) are now complete.
Because of very limited work areas and because much of the work is
similar, staff recommends combining these projects into one
contract.
(1) Job No. P1-34-3
This project is for six new 110-foot anaerobic digesters,
associated process piping, utility tunnels and a control
building. This construction will complete the original P1-34
design contract awarded to John Carollo Engineers by the Boards
of Directors in February 1988.
Currently under construction are Jobs P1-34-1 and P1-34-2, gas
and sludge handling facilities, which will upgrade the sludge
handling and storage ability and provide flexibility for
loading dried sludge onto trucks. Job No. P1-34-3 will provide
anaerobic digester space for sludge produced under Job No.
P1-33, Primary Clarifiers 6-15, as well as future expansion of
the activated sludge secondary plant.
(2) Job No. P1-35-2
This project is part of the Districts' ongoing effort to
rehabilitate and upgrade existing sludge digester facilities.
Job No. P1-35-2 will repair the digester domes and install a
PVC liner which will eliminate the fugitive emission of
digester gas through cracks in Digesters 9 and 10 at
Reclamation Plant No. 1. In addition, a high rate sludge
mixing system is to be installed which will improve the process
which produces methane digester gas (and solids decomposition)
and greatly reduce the potential for grit buildup in the
digesters.
In April 1988, the Directors approved an agreement with Brown
and Caldwell Engineers to prepare plans and specifications for
the rehabilitation of the final eleven digesters. In August
-9-
September 12, 1990
1989, the plans and specifications for this project were
approved; however, the approval was combined with a large
digester rehabilitation project at Treatment Plant No. 2. It
is resubmitted now in order to combine the work with the
construction of Job No. P1-34-3. Since rehabilitation of
digesters can take ral up to one year, the construction work has
been phased with seve jobs to minimize the impact of
reducing sludge digestion capacity and operation of both
Plants 1 and 2.
Staff recommends approval of plans and specifications and
authorization for the General Manager to establish the bid date for Jobs
Nos. P1-34-3 and P1-35-2. The bid date will be established based on the
upcoming debt financing program determinations.
The engineer's estimate for this work is $33.0 million.
12, CEQA ACTIONS RE SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 TO PROGRAM EIR FOR 1989 COLLECTION.
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES MASTER PLAN FOR INTERPLANT PIPELINE
AND UTILITY CORRIDOR. JOB NO. I-9.
In 1989 the Directors approved the updated master plan which provided for
facilities necessary to meet flow increases and regulatory discharge
requirements for the next 30 years. Also approved was an environmental impact
report which addressed most of the master-planned projects. However, a few
projects included within that document were only able to be addressed in a
general manner and were designated as needing further review and additional CEQA
documentation when the project was ready to begin the design phase. Job No.
I-9, Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, is one of those projects.
The 1989 Master Plan indicated that additional CEQA documentation would
be required for this project and, in August, the Directors initiated the process
by receiving the Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment, and
authorizing the preparation and circulation of Draft Supplement No. 1 to the
Program EIR for 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan
for the Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9, in compliance
with CEQA requirements. A Staff Summary and a copy of the Draft Supplement
No. 1 are included with the Directors' agenda material .
Following a verbal staff report at the Board meeting, the actions
appearing for consideration are to receive and file the comments received on the
Notice of Preparation, the staff report, the Draft Supplement No. 1 to the EIR;
to authorize filing of the Notice of Completion; and fix the public hearing on
the Draft Supplement No. 1 to the EIR on October 10, 1990 and the close of the
official public comment period on October 10, 1990.
If any Board member has questions regarding the Draft Supplement No. 1 to
Program EIR, please contact Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering, at 714/962-2411,
extension 310.
-10- `�
September 12, 1990
DISTRICTS 1. 2. 3. 5. 6. 7 AND 11 ONLY
13: APPROVE CREATION OF 1990 CONSTRUCTION FUNDS.
As a part of the 1990-91 budget process, Districts 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7
and 11 adopted budgets for new 1990 Construction Funds. These funds will serve
dual purposes. They will account for the proceeds of the new debt issuance now
underway, and for the construction of the debt-financed facilities. The action
on the agenda is to adopt resolutions formally creating these funds which will
allow the County Treasurer to take the necessary action.
ALL DISTRICTS
14: AGENDA FOR CLOSED SESSION.
From time to time it is necessary for the Boards to convene in closed
session to consider purchase and sale of real property, potential or pending
litigation, personnel matters or other matters which are exempt from public
disclosure under the California Public Records Act. In order to avoid a
situation where a closed session is needed but does not appear on the agenda,
this standing item is placed on the agenda each month providing for a closed
session at the regular meeting, if deemed necessary by the Boards.
DISTRICT 13
20: ESTABLISHING 1990-91 CHARGES FOR CLASS I. II AND III INDUSTRIAL WASTE
PERMITTEES.
Each year, following adoption of the annual budgets, the Directors
establish industrial user rates for the fiscal year. Rates have been calculated
in accordance with the Industrial Waste Ordinance adopted by the Boards. During
the past several years, the Districts have been redistributing the cost ratios
to more accurately reflect the higher costs for treating suspended solids (S.S.)
and biochemical oxygen demand (B.O.D.) as a result of the secondary treatment
process. This year the actual percentages are 18% to flow, 46% to S.S., and 36%
to B.O.D.
Last month, at the regular meeting on August 8th, Districts 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 11 and 14 adopted their 1990-91 rates. However, because District No. 13
did not have a quorum, this item has been carried over to this meeting.
The action appearing on the agenda is for District No. 13 to adopt a
resolution fixing its respective industrial user rates for 1990-91 as shown on
the agenda listing.
DISTRICT 2
23: APPROVAL OF ADDENDUM NO. 1 AND AWARD CONTRACT FOR PORTION OF EUCLID
INTERCEPTOR SEWER. BETWEEN BROADWAY AND ORANGETHORPE AVENUE. CONTRACT
N0. 2-P6-3, (INCLUDING CITY OF ANAHEIM STREET IMPROVEMENTS): KATELLA
RELIEF SEWER, BETWEEN EUCLID STREET AND WALNUT STREET (NINTH STREET) .
CONTRACT NO. 2-28: AND ORANGEWOOD DIVERSION SEWER: CONTRACT NO. 2-29.
u In September 1988, the Directors engaged Willdan Associates to design
Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue,
-11-
September 12, 1990,
Contract No. 2-26-3 and Katella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and Ninth
Street, Contract No. 2-28. In April 1989, the Directors engaged Willdan
Associates to design the Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29, which is
located on Orangewood Avenue between State College Boulevard and the Santa Ana
River. The projects were combined for bidding purposes for cost savings; most
of the pipe is the same size. All three of these sewers were identified in
Amendment No. 1 to the Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for Districts 2,
3 and 11, approved in 1987. Three other separate portions of the Euclid
Interceptor system have been constructed during the last three years and are in
service.
Contract No. 2-26-3 will construct an interceptor sewer beginning at
Broadway in the City of Anaheim (which was the northerly terminus of Contract
No. 2-26 completed in October 1989) and ending on Orangethorpe Avenue at
Jefferson Avenue in the City of Fullerton where it ties into the Fullerton-Brea
Interceptor Sewer which was completed in February 1988. Last December the Board
of Directors approved a cooperative agreement with the City of Anaheim for the
construction of street improvements on Euclid Street between La Palma Avenue
and the 91 Freeway, and providing for reimbursement of the cost for
construction. The City improvements will be included in District's Contract
No. 2-26-3.
The Katella Relief Sewer, Contract No. 2-28, will connect the Euclid
Interceptor Sewer to the South Anaheim Sewer extending from Euclid Street and
Katella Avenue about 1/2-mile east to Ninth Street, relieving the South Anaheim
Sewer and the downstream Newhope-Placentia Trunk Sewer.
The Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29, will also help to
relieve the Newhope-Placentia Sewer by diverting flows to the Santa Ana River
Interceptor Sewer.
(a) Verbal Staff Report
Staff will briefly review the project at the Board meeting.
(b) Addendum No. 1
Addendum No. 1 clarified traffic lane requirements in the
specifications during non-working hours on Orangethorpe Avenue at the
request of the City of Fullerton.
A bonus/penalty amount of $500 per day as an incentive for the
timely completion of Contract No. 2-29 has been added to the bid
documents. Also, the bonus/penalty for each phase of sewer construction
through the commercial areas on Euclid Street was clarified in Section
50-8 and Section 52-108 of the Detailed Specifications.
Staff recommends approval of Addendum No. 1.
(c) Contract Award
On August 21, 1990, seven bids were received for Portion of Euclid
Interceptor Sewer, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract No.
2-26-3, (including City of Anaheim Street Improvements) ; Katella Relief
Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street (Ninth Street), Contract
-12-
September 12, 1990
`i
No. 2-28; and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29. The bids
ranged from a high of $9,826,516.78 to a low of $7,953,755.00, submitted
by Steve Bubalo Construction Co. A complete bid tabulation is attached
to the agenda.
Staff recommends award to Steve Bubalo Construction Co. for their
low bid amount of $7,953,755.00. The engineer's estimate for the
combined total for these three projects was $12,000,000.00.
DISTRICTS 3 AND 11
26: ACTIONS RE MASTER-PLANNED AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS.
CONTRACT NO. 11-17.
In June 1989, the Directors approved a Professional Services Agreement
with John Carollo Engineers (JCE) for preparation of a project report for the
Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17.
Included in the Project Report, which was approved by the Directors in May 1990,
was a cost-sharing formula for financing and the respecive District's capacity
ownership for the proposed facilities, based on the anticipated annexation of
Bolsa Chica to District 11, which provided for a net payment of $630,836.00 by
District 3 to District 11. That figure must now be revised to $699,636.00
because District 3 will own a larger share of the system capacity now that the
property owners have decided not to proceed with the Bolsa Chica annexation.
The Directors are aware that the initial project was originally sized to
serve the proposed development within the Bolsa Chica area, subject to execution
of a preannexation agreement with the major property owner, Signal Bolsa
Corporation, to provide for payment of annexation fees. The developer has
elected to not enter into the agreement at this time and, therefore, the project
will be downsized from that previously anticipated. The initial project,
extending from Golden West Street to Nichols Avenue in Slater Avenue, including
the new pump station, is now estimated to cost approximately $7,220,600.00 (down
from $7,600,000.00) with District 3 paying approximately 16 percent and
District 11 paying approximately 84 percent. It will also eliminate the future
need for the Slater Avenue Relief Sewer at an estimated savings of $2.6 million
to District 11.
The June 1989 engineering services authorization also provided for the
negotiation of final design and construction support services with JCE. As
authorized by the Boards in June, the Selection Committee has met and negotiated
Addendum No. 1 to the original design contract for the pump station design as
well as influent and effluent lines, in the amount of $649,383.00, based on
hourly rates plus overhead, plus direct expenses and fixed profit, which will
increase the total authorized compensation from $44,738.00 to an amount not to
exceed $694,121.00.
-13-
September 12, 1990
Proposed
Existing Proposed Amended
Agreement Addn. No. 1 Agreement
Professional Services,
(hourly rates including
labor plus overhead at
153%), not to exceed $ 38,903 $512,088 $550,991
Direct Expenses,
not to exceed -0- 3,000 3,000
Subconsultant Fees,
not to exceed -0- 70,295 70,295
Fixed Profit 5,835 64,000 69.835
$ 44,738 $649,383 $694,121
Following a verbal staff report at the Board meeting, the actions
appearing on the agenda are to:
Adopt Resolution No. 90-129, which approves the new agreement between
Districts 3 and 11 for financing, design, construction, capacity
ownership and operations of certain master-planned sewage collection
facilities for serving Districts 3 and 11, and rescinds Resolution
No. 90-53 which originally approved the agreement last May;
Receive and file the Selection Committee's certification of the final
negotiated fee for the above described work and adopt a resolution
approving Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with John
Carollo Engineers. Copies of the certification and resolution are
attached with the supporting documents.
DISTRICTS 6. 7 AND 14
31: ACTIONS RE EIR AND RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITIONS FOR BAKER-GISLER
INTERCEPTOR. CONTRACT NO. 14-1-1A.
In July the Boards certified Supplement No. 1 to the EIR for Proposed
Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization
No. 79 Involving Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13, pertaining to the
Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Contracts Nos. 14-1-1A and 14-1-1B, and Baker Force
Mains, Contract No. 14-1-2, and approved the projects for construction. The
Supplement addressed the changes to the project since conception as well as
identifying final alignment and pipe size.
In July, staff and General Counsel advised the Directors that three
property owners had objected to the sewer alignment through their property. We
have been unable to negotiate the purchase of easements necessary from these
three property owners required for the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview
Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A. In fact, one of the property owners,
Mesa Verde Country Club, has filed a_ legal action challenging the Districts'
CEQA proceedings. Attached to the supporting agenda documents is a separate
memorandum from the General Counsel pertaining to this action. The General
Counsel has, therefore, determined that eminent domain action may be the only
recourse if continued negotiations are unsuccessful .
�7
-14-
September 12, 1990
Accordingly, the action items appearing on the agenda are to receive and
file the General Counsel 's report; authorize the General Counsel to appear and
defend the Districts interests on the lawsuit; and adoption of a resolution
setting October 10, 1990 at 7:30 p.m. in the Board Room, as the time and place
for the required public hearing on the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity to
order the acquisition of certain properties by eminent domain. The Resolution
of Necessity will be presented to the Directors as part of the October hearing
package.
DISTRICTS 7 AND 14 ..
34: APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR BAKER FORCE MAINS. CONTRACT
NO. 14-1-2.
In July 1988, the Directors approved a contract amendment with Boyle
Engineering Corporation for design and construction support for the Baker-Gisler
Interceptor, Baker Force Mains and Fairview Relief Sewer, Contract Nos. 14-1-1.
14-1-2 and 6-12. The projects include the construction of force main sewers and
gravity trunk sewers from the Main Street Pump Station located within the "clear
zone" of the John Wayne Airport to Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley.
A 90-inch sewer is planned between the Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant No. 1
and Fairview Road, an 81-inch trunk sewer between Fairview Road and Bristol
Street and dual 42-inch force mains in Baker Street between Bristol Street and
the pump station. The projects will benefit Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14 by
providing the lowest cost construction per unit of capacity possible.
The first portion of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Contract No. 14-1-lB,
covering the construction of the trunk sewer between Bristol Street and
Fairview Road is under construction and nearly complete. The second reach,
Contract No. 14-1-1A (between Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Fairview Road) , is
currently awaiting acquisition of several easements necessary for its
construction (see separate Agenda Item No. 31) .
On April 11, 1990, the Directors approved an agreement with the County
of Orange relating to the acquisition of permanent and temporary easements for
the construction and operation of the Baker Force Mains, Contract No. 14-1-2,
which includes the construction between Bristol Street and the Main Street Pump
Station. The plans and specifications are complete and the project is now ready
for bidding. The project was designed with dual force mains to minimize
long-term pumping costs while providing the reliability of a second conduit
should one conduit fail . Included within this two-mile long project is a tunnel
under the San Diego Freeway, from the west side of the John Wayne Airport
property to the pump station. The engineer's estimate for Contract No. 14-1-2
is $7,000,000.
Following a verbal staff report at the Board meeting, the agenda action
is to consider approval of the plans and specifications for the Baker Force
Mains, from Main Street Pump Station to Bristol Street, Contract No. 14-1-2,
and authorize the General Manager to establish the date of receipt of bids. A
tentative bid date of October 16, 1990 is scheduled.
-15-
RE : AGENDA ITEM NO , 12 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
d ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA
September 5, 1990 1o944 ew9 AVENUE
Pn e0%9127
W WMNVAt .0 UFaRN1492n8B8127
MMBE24411
STAFF REPORT
Summary of Draft Supplement No. 1 to
Program Environmental Impact Report .
Re
Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9
In 1989 the Directors approved the updated master plan which provided for
facilities necessary to meet flow and regulatory discharge requirements for the
next 30 years. Also approved was an Environmental Impact Report which addressed
most of the master-planned projects. However, a few projects included within
that document were only able to be addressed in a general manner and were
designated as needing further review and additional CEpA documentation when the
project was ready to begin the design phase. Job No. I-9, Interplant Pipeline
and Utility Corridor, is one of those projects.
In February the Directors approved a professional services agreement
with John Carollo Engineers to provide environmental services, preliminary and
final design and construction support services for the I-9 project. The design
calls for a new 120-inch diameter sewer line to transport treated wastewater
within a 30-foot corridor along the westerly levee of the Santa Ana River from
the Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant to the Ocean Outfall Booster Station at
Treatment Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach. The new pipeline will be
approximately 18,700 feet long and will replace an old 42-inch line which is
over 60 years old and in poor condition. Other utilities are located in the
interplant corridor and the Master Plan identified immediate and future
interplant utility requirements including new pipelines for pure oxygen,
industrial (reclaimed) water, sludge, interplant digester gas lines and
communications facilities. The estimated cost of this project is $32 million.
Located within the existing corridor are power poles which belong to
Southern California Edison which will have to be relocated per our easement
agreement of 1977. Staff, Edison and General Counsel are attempting to reach
agreement on this issue.
At Plant No. 2 there are several oil leases which have operating wells
which interfere with the construction of the pipelines and they must be
purchased, removed and abandoned. Authority was granted in August to enter into
negotiations with the leaseholders.
The Corps of Engineers in conjunction with the County of Orange have also
scheduled Santa Ana River channel improvements which could conflict with the
construction of this project and the possible impacts and scheduling constraints
must be addressed.
The Draft Supplement No. 1 provides a basis to determine the effects of
the proposed project on the environment and as a vehicle to coordinate this
project with the Orange County Water District's "Green Acres" water reclamation
project and the County of Orange/Corps of Engineers flood control improvement
project on the Santa Ana River between the river mouth and the San Diego
Freeway.
The impacts of the project are both short term caused by the construction
as well as long term after completion of the project. The long-tern effects
include the fact that this project will facilitate population and employment
increases. Those items were addressed in the 1989 Master Plan Environmental
Impact Report and are not repeated in this document.
Short-term effects include typical construction activity impacts, changes
to the property, impacts on adjacent property owners, including streets and
other public services. The Report identifies the mitigation measures to reduce
the disruption. Probably the largest disruption is to the Santa Ana River bike
trail which must be relocated when this and the adjacent (and concurrent) Santa
Ana River Mainstem project are implemented. Staff is working with the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and the County of Orange to reduce and minimize the effects
of this project. Together with the County of Orange EMA, a temporary facility
may be required as an alternate bikeway path. The report includes the
requirement that the Districts obtain encroachment permits and comply with
conditions identified with the County of Orange EMA, coordinate with the Corps
of Engineers, and obtain other necessary permits from regulatory agencies.
Permits and easements must also be obtained from Southern California Edison, the
City of Huntington Beach, the Coastal Commission, the state Department of Fish
and Game, and the Division of Industrial Safety.
TMD:jt
DRAFT SUPPLEMENT NO. 1
to
PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT
on
Collection, Treatment, and
Disposal Facilities Master Plan
Addressing
Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor Project
Joint Treatment Works Project 1-9
August 1990
'NRNi/GN
'�Z na�luac O.e�/JJ
n
NgNGE GG�Nt
_ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
r
r
DRAFT SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 (SCH # 90010580)
Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor Project
Joint Treatment Works Project I-9
PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH # 88012008)
FOR COLLECTION, TREATMENT, AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES
FOR THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
r
Originally Certified by the Board of Directors
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
July 1989
Lead Agency.-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
�- 10944 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Contact Person: Mr. Thomas Dawes
(714) 540-2910
Mailing Address:
r
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-9127
Prepared by:
r
10 Environmental
215 River Acres Drive
Sacramento, CA 95831
Contact Person: Mr. Kris Lindstrom
(916) 429-8140
August, 1"0
U.J
L
ABBREVIATIONS AND TERMS USED
CDF&G - California Department of Fish and Game
CEQA - California Environmental Quality Act
COE - Corps of Engineers (U.S. Army)
CSDOC - County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
CWPS - City Water Pump Station
dB(A) - decibels (A-weighted scale)
DEIR - Draft Environmental Impact Report
DIS - Division of Industrial Safety
EIR - Environmental Impact Report
EMA - Environmental Management Agency (County of Orange) L
EPA - Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.)
FEIR - Final Environmental Impact Report
GSA . General Services Agency (County of Orange)
ICE . John Carollo Engineers
kV - kilovolt
MWD - Metropolitan Water District L
NPDES - National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
NOP - Notice of Preparation
OCFCD - Orange County Flood Control District
OCWD - Orange County Water District
OOBS - Ocean Outfall Booster Station
RWQCB - Regional Water Quality Control Board L
SAR - Santa Ana River
SARMP - Santa Ana River Maintenance Project
SCAG - Southern California Association of Governments L
SCAQMD - South Coast Air Quality Management District
SCE - Southern California Edison
SCGC - Southern California Gas Company
SCH - State Clearinghouse
TDS - Total Dissolved Solids
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
r
t TABLE OF CONTENTS
v✓
r Section Pam
1.0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
r
1.1 PURPOSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 SCOPE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT TO THE FEIl2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
r 1.3 PROJECT HISTORY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
IA INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.5 RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.6 INTENDED USE OF THE SUPPLEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.7 AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.8 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.9 REQUIRED EASEMENTS AND PERMITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.1 LOCATION AND BOUNDARIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.2 STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.3 PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.3.1 Proposed Interplant Conduit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.3.2 Digester Gas Pipeline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.3.3 Industrial Water Pipeline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
23.4 Existing Interplant Communication Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3.0 SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND
" MITIGATION MEASURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.1 SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
r 3.2 PROJECT CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
33 AREAS OF CONTROVERSY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
4.0 RELATED PROJECTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES OF POTENTIALLY
r SIGNIFICANT ISSUES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
5.1 EARTH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
5.1.1 Environmental Setting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
_ 5.12 Project Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
5.13 Mitigation Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
5.1.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
5.2 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY SECTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
5.2.1 Environmental Setting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
r 5.2.2 Project Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
5.2.3 Mitigation Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
5.2.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
i
r
L
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(Continued)
Section Pam �.
53 BIOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
5.3.1 Environmental Setting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 L.
5.3.2 Project Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
5.3.3 Mitigation Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
5.3.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 L
5.4 NOISE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
5.4.1 Environmental Setting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
5.4.2 Project Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
5A.2.1 Construction Related Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
5.4.2.2 Operational Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
5.4.3 Mitigation Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
5.4.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
5.5 LAND USE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
5.5.1 Environmental Setting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 16„
5.5.2 Project Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
55.3 Mitigation Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
5.5.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 L
5.6 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
5.6.1 Environmental Setting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
5.6.2 Project Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 L
5.6.3 Mitigation Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
5.6.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
5.7 AIR QUALITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
5.7.1 Environmental Setting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
5.72 Project Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
5.73 Mitigation Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
5.8 RECREATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
5.8.1 Environmental Setting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
5.8.2 Project Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 L
5.8.3 Mitigation Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
5.8.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
5.9 UTILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 L
5.9.1 Electricity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
5.9.1.1 Environmental Setting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
5.9.1.2 Project Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
5.9.1.3 Mitigation Measures 43 6"
5.9.1.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
5.9.2 Natural Gas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 L
5.92.1 Environmental Setting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
5.92.2 Project Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
5.92.3 Mitigation Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
5.9.2.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
�L
u L
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(Continued)
r Section Page
5.93 Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
5.9.3.1 Environmental Setting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
5.932 Project Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
5.933 Mitigation Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
r 5.93.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
5.9.4 Sewers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
5.9.4.1 Environmental Setting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
5.9.42 Project Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
5.9.43 Mitigation Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
5.9.4.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
r 5.95 Telephone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
5.95.1 Environmental Setting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
5.952 Project Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
5.9.5.3 Mitigation Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
' 5.95.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
5.9.6 Oil Wells and Related Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
5.9.6.1 Environmental Setting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
5.9.62 Project Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
5.9.63 Mitigation Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
5.9.6.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
5.10 HEALTH AND SAFETY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
5.10.1 Environmental Setting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
5.10.2 Project Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
`r 5.103 Mitigation Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
5.10A Unavoidable Adverse Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
5.11 AESTHETICS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
5.11.1 Environmental Setting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
5.112 Project Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
5.113 Mitigation Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
5.11.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
6.0 GROWTH-INDUCING IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED ACTION . . . . . . 52
r
7.0 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
r 7.1 ALTERNATIVE 1: NO PROJECT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
72 ALTERNATIVE 2: ALTERNATIVE PIPELINE ROUTE . . . . . . . . . . 53
73 ALTERNATIVE 3: ALTERNATIVE CONDUIT SIZES . . . . . . . . . . . 54
r 73.1 Alternative Conduit No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
_ 73.2 Alternative Conduit No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
733 Alternative Conduit No. 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
73A Lining Alternatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
iu
r
L
TABLE OF CONTENTS �d
(Continued) /
Section Page L
7A SUMMARY OF CAPACITY ALTERNATIVES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
7.5 INDUSTRIAL WATER PIPELINE ALTERNATIVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 L
7.6 FIBER OPTIC CABLE ALTERNATIVES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
7.6.1. Plan 2 - Dual Cables in Same Conduit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
7.6.2 Plan 3 - Dual Conduit Alternative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 L
8.0 THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOCAL SHORT-TERM USES
OF MAN'S ENVIRONMENT AND THE MAINTENANCE AND L
ENHANCEMENT OF LONG-TERM PRODUCTIVITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
9.0 ANY SIGNIFICANT IRREVERSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES i
6.
WHICH WOULD BE INVOLVED IN THE PROPOSED ACTION
SHOULD IT BE IMPLEMENTED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
10.0 AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS CONTACTED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 L•
11.0 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
iv L
r
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
r
1 Summary of Environmental Impacts and Proposed Mitigation Measures . 12
r 2 Typical Sources of Community Noise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
3 Typical Construction Noise Sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
r
4 Average Emission Factors for Heavy Construction Equipment . . . . . . . . . 38
,y 5 Emissions Associated with Demolition and Excavation and
Hauling of Materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
6 Summary of Hydraulic Capacity of Interplant Pipeline Alternatives . . . . . 56
7 Surcharged Capacities of Various Pipeline and Conduit Alternatives . . . . 56
8 Cost Comparison for Alternative Conduits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
r
9 Environmental Comparison of Conduit Alternatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r /
v
r
I
V
LIST OF FIGURES
After
Figure Page
1 Regional Location Map for Proposed Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 L
2 Proposed Project Site-Specific Location Map Showing Construction
Easements and Key Facilities and Land Uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 L
3 Specific Location Maps Showing CSDOC Right-of-Way and Pipe-
lines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
L
4 Project Map Depicting Proposed Utility Lines (Interplant Gas Line,
Industrial Water Line, and Communications line) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
V
5 Map Showing Existing Pipeline Alignments North and South of Adams
Avenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
6 Typical Cross Section North and South of Adams Avenue for 120-inch L
Pipeline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
7 Typical Cross Section North and South of Adams Avenue for Box
Conduit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
i
8 Map Showing Location of Proposed Industrial Water Pipeline v
Alternatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
9 Proposed Construction Schedule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
10 Location of Utilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 L
11 Schematic Depicting Conceptual Use of the 84-inch Pipe as a Utility
Corridor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 L
V
I�
L
L
vl
1.0 INTRODUCTION
�J
�+ 1.1 PURPOSE
r This document is a supplement to a previously certified Program EIR which
described the proposed project (Jones and Stokes, Inc., 1989). In July 1989 the Program
EIR was certified for a thirty-year Master Plan for Collection, Treatment and Disposal
r Facilities (Master Plan) to serve the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
(Districts).
.. Pursuant to Section 15163 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the Lead Agency, the
Districts have chosen to prepare a supplement to the previously certified EIR. A supple-
ment is the appropriate format because no major conceptual changes in the project have
r been proposed by the Districts and the focus is the site-specific impacts. Proposed changes
were anticipated as part of the on-going planning and preliminary and final design as more
information became available as stated on page 5-19 of the EIR as follows:
r
"The Sanitation Districts own an interplant utility corridor, which consists
of a 4-mile-long, 30-foot-wide strip of land adjacent to the Santa Ana River
between Plant No. I and Plant No. 2 The corridor is used for pipelines and
utilities between the two plants. A new interplant connection,consisting of a 120-
inch-diameter pipeline and new utility lines, will be added to the interplant
r corridor as pan of the master plan
(NOTE. See Figure Ion the following page for the location and regional
setting of proposed project)
A county-maintained bike path runs along the river on top of the levee.
The bike path starts near the Orange County/Riverside County border and crosses
the river several times before reaching the beach. in the vicinity of the project,
the bike path runs along the east side of the river north of Adams Avenue in
Huntington Beach lust south ofAdams Avenue, it crosses to the west side of the
" river and extends south to the coast.
Construction methods and strategies forplacing the 10 fool-diameter pipe
within the already crowded easement are as yet undefined A supplemental EIR
would be required to evaluate specific impacts of the interplant pipeline. General
impact discussions are presented below.
r
Construction of the interplant connection pipeline will take place within
rights-of-way owned by the Sanitation Districts between the two plants. No
significant traffic generation or hazards are expected to occur during construction
of the pipeline. No road or lane closures orparEngproblents would occur during
construction Construction would not affect levee stability. Heavy truck traffic
will traverse the easement to convey excavated sod,pipe, and backfilf material to
allow work within the 30 foot easement. Noise,dust, and din would be generated
J by construction activity. Some temporary aesthetic impacts would occur.
1
r
�• OO R1.7
• YORB1 1\� JIJ
9 E �, �• Lvdt.. � '�./I
YPpE99 n I V1
P
3 9T0bu •GR V pILTMCTM
B �.MLRH O!
T {
YGX
•I d
L
T e NVME
IE^MMRT y
LEWI -
Txe.nexr A U
xuxTuarox seex J
:6CLIYxTIv: rIAMT x0.1 I THE .IY
OVYTgX ILEY ,•
;�� 41E, L
4
� oar
�iYr%11•
L
r�
- L
� .IYt Mi
\ '
REGIONAL LOCATION MAP
FIGURE 1
L
Construction activities would require temporary relocation of the bike
trail It is anticipated that the trail could be relocated to the other side of the
river with placement of a temporary bridge and new paving."
This EIR Supplement reflects the latest proposed changes.
This supplement has been prepared in accordance with the California Environ-
mental Quality Act(CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., and Administra-
tive Code Section 15000 et seq., as amended. The Districts is the Lead Agency for this
supplement,and is the public agency with principal responsibility for approving the required
entitlements of the proposed project and implementing construction and environmental
impact mitigation. The latter will be achieved through adoption of a resolution adopting
a final EIR and various mitigation measures to be implemented through a mitigation
monitoring program. (See Section 1.8 for details.)
1.2 SCOPE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT TO THE FEIR
Pursuant to Section 15163(b) of the State CEQA Guidelines, '"I'he supplement to the
EIR need contain only the information necessary to make the previous EIR adequate for
the project as revised."
The Lead Agency (Districts) prepared an Initial Study on the revised project, and
circulated it as part of the Notice of Preparation (NOP). These are included as
Appendix A. The Initial Study, combined with the responses to the NOP,provide the basis
for determining the environmental issues that will be evaluated in this supplement. The
environmental issues to be evaluated in this supplement include:
o Earth
o Hydrology and Water Quality
o Biota
o Noise
o Land Use
o Transportation/Circulation
o Air Quality
o Recreation
o Electricity
o Natural Gas
o Water
o Sewers
o Telephone
o Human Health
o Aesthetics
The other environmental issues such as projected flows, water quality from the joint
treatment works, growth inducement of wastewater facilities, regional air quality impacts,
and other growth-related and secondary impacts were discussed in the previously certified
2
1
Master Plan Program FEIR were not considered potentially significant in the Initial Study +
prepared for this supplement or in the responses to the NOP.
L
1.3 PROJECT HISTORY
LL
In July 1989 a Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified on the
Master Plan which addressed the long-term wastewater collection, treatment and disposal
needs of the Districts until the year 2020. Included in the project description and EIR was
an interplant pipeline and utility corridor project. The adopted FEIR stated that:
"Wastewater treated at Plant No. 1 is conveyed to the outfall booster pump station L
at Plant No. 2 via the 66-inch and 84-inch interplant effluent lines adjacent to the Santa
Ana River. The combined capacity of these two lines is 171 mgd,which could be exceeded
by peak wet weather flows as soon as the Pi-33 primary sedimentation basins are opera-
tional in 1990. The capacity of these two lines can be increased to about 335 mgd, however,
by pressurizing them to a maximum of 50 feet of head. This, however,will not provide for
the projected 2020 peak flow requirement of 408 mgd. Therefore, it is anticipated that an "
additional 120-inch interplant effluent line for use in combination with the existing 66- and
84-inch tines for Plant No. 1 effluent will be constructed in the near future."
In June 1990 the Districts issued a Notice of Preparation (NOP) indicating that a ~
supplement (SCH. #90010580) would be prepared which would analyze the potential
environmental impacts resulting from the proposed project. The NOP, which includes the
Initial Study, is provided as Appendix A. The responses received to the NOP are provided
in Appendix B. This supplement addresses the final alignment, sizing and design of the
proposed sewage effluent conveyance facilities and interplant utility lines associated with L
this project.
1A INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Lr
The State CEQA Guidelines allow environmental impact reports and negative L
declarations to incorporate by reference all or portions of other documents that are a
matter of public record. Where all or a portion of another document is incorporated by
reference, the incorporated language shall be considered to be set forth in full as part of
the text of the environmental impact report or negative declaration.
The information contained in this EIR is based, in part, upon prior environmental L
documentation and focused environmental inquiry which includes the project. These
documents, incorporated by reference, include the following: L
o Draft Environmental Impact Report on Collection, Treatment, and Disposal
Facilities Master Plan (State Clearinghouse Nos. 88012008 and 88010306),
March, 1989.
3 L
o Final Environmental Impact Report on Collection, Treatment, and Disposal
Facilities Master Plan (State Clearinghouse Nos. 88012008 and 88010306),
July 1989.
Copies of these documents are available for review at the office of the County
,. Sanitation Districts of Orange County (10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, CA) during
regular business hours.
.. 1.5 RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES
.. The State Clearinghouse, located within the Office of Planning and Research (OPR)
a branch of the Governor's Office, received a copy of the NOP from the Lead Agency and
transmitted copies of that NOP to those state agencies which OPR identified as potentially
responsible. The project has been assigned State Clearinghouse Number 90010580.
Other responsible agencies who have received a copy of the NOP from the Districts
include the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, California Department of Transportation
(Caltrans), California Department of Fish and Game (CDF&G), South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD), Southern California Association of Governments
(SCAG), County of Orange, cities of Costa Mesa, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, and
Irvine; and the Southern California Edison Company (SCE).
r
1.6 INTENDED USE OF THE SUPPLEMENT
r
The intent of this document is two-fold. First, it is to provide an environmental
basis for the decision-making process through the identification of those direct and indirect
environmental effects which may result from the proposed construction of the project. A
second purpose is to develop appropriate mitigation measures which can be incorporated
into any subsequent discretionary actions on the project to minimize potential environmental
impacts associated therewith. Appropriate mitigation measures will be incorporated into
the Findings and Mitigation Monitoring Plan (see Section 1.8 below) adopted by the
Districts' Boards of Directors. Subsequently, they will be incorporated into any design
specifications for the approved project.
The Initial Study(Appendix A) contains evaluations of all 'des"and"maybe" answers
and does not provide evaluation of "no" responses, in accordance to CEQA Guidelines
which state "Explanations of all'yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets"
(CEQA, Appendix I, page 288).
4
L
1.7 AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATION
i
The following agencies and organizations are associated with this project: {.+
Lead Agency Applicant: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue V'
(Post Office Box 8127)
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
(714) 962-2411 y
Environmental Consultant: IV Environmental
215 River Acres Drive
Sacramento, CA 95831
(916) 429-8140
L
Engineering Consultant: John Carollo Engineers (JCE)
3100 South Harbor Boulevard, Suite 200
Santa Ana, CA 92704
(714) 540.4300
i
1.8 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING L'
State legislation (Assembly Bill 3180), codified as Section 21081.6 of the Public r
Resource Code, requires public agencies to set up monitoring and reporting programs for
the purpose of ensuring compliance with those mitigation measures adopted as conditions
of Project approval. This is designed to avoid significant environmental effects identified
in environmental impact reports and negative declarations,and require that they be adopted
as conditions of Project approval. The statutes states:
When making the findings required by subdivision (a) of Section 21081 or
when adopting a negative declaration pursuant to paragraph(2) of subdivision
(c) of Section 21080, the public agency shall adopt a reporting or monitoring
program for the changes to the project which it has adopted or made a
condition of project approval in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects
on the environment. The reporting or monitoring program shall be designed
to ensure compliance during project implementation. For those changes
which have been required or incorporated into the project at the request of
an agency having jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by this
project, that agency shall, if so requested by the lead or responsible agency,
prepare and submit a proposed reporting or monitoring program.
Pursuant to this requirement, the Lead Agency and/or applicable Responsible
Agencies are obligated by statute to establish and monitor project compliance with those
mitigation measures adopted as conditions of approval for the purpose of mitigating L
significant environmental effects. The manner in which compliance with this requirement
is normally established by the Districts is to contract with the Districts' environmental
5
consultant, to review all Plans and Specifications prior to approval by the Boards of
Directors to ensure that adopted mitigation measures have been incorporated into project
design and construction specifications.
1.9 REQUIRED EASEMENTS AND PERMITS
Various federal, state, and local agencies were contacted by JCE and W in order to
identify needed permits, approvals, easements, and entry rights for project implementation.
The permits identified include the following.
Agency Permit
Army Corp of Engineers 404 Permit
California Department of Fish and Game Streambed Alteration Permit
`+ California Coastal Commission Coastal Development Permit
Regional Water Quality Control Board Dewatering Permit
California Department of Conservation
r
Division of Oil and Gas Notice of Intention to Abandon Well
Environmental Management Agency Encroachment Permit
Southern California Edison Temporary Entry Permit or
Easement Permit
City of Huntington Beach Encroachment Permit
City Construction Permit
^� Division of Industrial Safety Contractor's Permit for Shoring
Work
.d
The proposed alignment will not require procurement of any additional permanent
casements from public or private owners. Some temporary construction easements will be
required to facilitate bringing materials and equipment to the job site, stockpiling materials,
and to facilitate construction. Easement locations are depicted on Figure 2.
A construction permit will be required from Orange County EMA to use the Santa
Ana River channel and levee.
The SAR will be under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Array Corps of Engineers (COE)
and will require compliance to measures identified by that agency and the County of Orange
6
PLANT NO. 1 9 L Lj
rr
EASEMENT REQUESTED FROM SCE \ t
r
SCE SUBSTATION
i LNURSERIES LEASED FROM BCE
:3 .a:rs:i.7i
EASEMENT FROM CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH REOUESTEO-� R
NURSERIES LEASED FROM SCSI
aJL=
EASEMENT REQUESTED,
FROM OCEMA
SCE RIGHT—OF—WAY J ;II •� L�
A;
EASEMENT REQUES �"=�'� /
FROM SCE - / RW® SINEPATN f
u
SCE BUBSTAII-1 I %
L
EASEMENT FROM CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUESTED
PROPOSED PROJECT SITE-SPECIFlC
PLANT NO. 2 LOCATION MAP CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS
I!! AND KEY FACILITIES AND LAND USES
"' FIGURE 2 LI
which has agreed to serve as the Lead Agency for local flood control improvements (see
Section 4.0 for further discussion).
A utilities encroachment permit will be required by the County of Orange and the
City of Huntington Beach to construct and maintain facilities under local surface streets.
Temporary easement rights or entry permit will also be required from Southern
California Edison (SCE) along a portion of the pipeline route as shown in Figure 2.
Additional permits for construction of the sewage conveyance facilities will be
required from Division of Industrial Safety (DIS), California Regional Water Quality
Control Board, Region 8 (RWQCB), California Department of Fish and Game (CDF&G),
and California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil and Gas, for abandonment of
the oil and gas wells at Plant No. 2.
All tunneled or jacked casing installations will require that the contractor obtain a
permit from DIS to expedite this process, and "underground classification"will be obtained
during the final design phase from DIS for each tunnel or jacked casing installation, and
included in the specification. These will include Adams and Hamilton Avenues in
Huntington Beach.
The RWQCB requires a permit for the discharge of dewatering effluent from any of
the construction activities.
The Districts' blanket NPDES dewatering permit covering the requirements for such
construction activities will be included in the contract specifications and the Districts will
supervise and oversee these operations to ensure compliance and assist as necessary to
fulfill compliance. This can include accepting dewatering waters into local sewer lines via
local manhole access lines.
The City of Huntington Beach requires a permit for construction activities to be
exempted from provisions of the local noise ordinance.
A Coastal Development Permit is required from the California Coastal Commission
for work in the coastal zone.
2.0 PROJECT DESCREMON
The project is to be constructed within the boundaries of the City of Huntington
Beach in Orange County, California, within the service area of the County Sanitation
Districts of Orange County (Figure 1).
7
.d
L
2.1 LOCATION AND BOUNDARIES
The project consists of replacement of an existing deteriorated 42-inch diameter b
elliptical effluent pipeline which was once used to convey treated effluent from Reclamation
Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley to Treatment Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach along an
existing right-of-way owned by County of Orange and the Sanitation Districts which is
parallel to the Santa Ana River (Figure 3). The pipeline will occupy a narrow corridor
within the existing 30-foot-wide easement and extend a total distance of four miles. L
In addition to the interplant pipeline, three utility lines will be installed in the
Districts' right-of-way. These include a new 18-inch diameter interplant digester gas
pipeline, a 16-inch industrial water line, and a fiber optic communications network to y
replace existing copper communication cables (Figure 4).
2.2 STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES
The new pipeline is required to provide additional capacity for interplant flow L
between Plant No. 1 and the Ocean Outfall Booster Station (GOBS) at Plant No. 2 which
the previously adopted Master Plan projected to reach 408 mgd by 2020 and 450 mgd under u
peak flow conditions.
2.3 PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS L
The project characteristics, detailed evaluation of alternatives and their costs and 6W
technical merits and other details involved in the planning and selection of the proposed
project were documented in a series of Design Memoranda prepared for the Districts by Lr
John Carollo Engineers (JCE). These were used as a basis for defining the project
characteristics and evaluating various alternatives.
23.1 Proposed Interplant Conduit
I
This project would involve placement of a new 120-inch, PVC-lined pipeline or
equivalent box conduit (9.5 feet wide by 9.0 feet high) having a capacity of 278 mgd. It
would operate in parallel with the existing 66-inch and the existing 84-inch pipelines. An ;
existing(very old) 42-inch pipeline would be removed. The existing 66-inch and the existing
84-inch pipelines would still be available for service, providing capacities of 45 mgd and
97 mgd, respectively, yielding a total capacity of 420 mgd. These existing 66-inch and I
84-inch pipelines could be lined in the future to improve their interior surfaces and to
decrease the roughness of the pipe thereby increasing their capacities to 56 mgd and
114 mgd, respectively. Total resulting capacity would be 448 mgd at an estimated cost of
$1.4 million and $1.8 million, respectively. 6'
�L
8 L
e 3dnow
S3Nn3dld (INV
AVM-d0-1H°JIH OOOSO
DNIMOHS dVW NOUVOOI OId133dS e'er
m
-IT' J9r
p -
AVM-do-imili o006o
T
.AvM-do-.tmiu OOGSO
DIGESTER GAS LINE - 18 INCH STEEL PIPE
WITH FUSION BONDED EPDXY COATING FIBER.-OFTIL CABLE .TRENCH DE TAIL
Z4' MINIMUM COVER
INDUSTRIAL WATER LINE - 18 INCH DUCTIVE IRON PIPE - "'I"" �]IL LAP
FIBER OPTIC CABLE - 4 INCH PVC PIPE ENCASED IN CONCRETE .g—�
ur.l
-IL"CONLI:I`
r
W
J
POWEIh PALE W 5
F
3 9
3
a
VW1 0 3 Y 4
6 ? rcu u
30
1
20 1
10 '
II
N �
0
00 6 D 0 20 0 20 40
PROPOSED UTILITY LINES(INTERPLANT
INTERPLANT UTILITY CORRIDOR GAS LINE, INDUSTRIAL WATER LINE,
120E INTERPLANT PIPELINE AND COMMUNICATIONS LINE
FIGURE 4
[- r C" f- f_ _ C r _ [ f- f-- f-- f_ f-_ C - j- f-- a-(L f-
S3Nn3dld UNV
AVM-d0-1NDIH OOOSO
DNIMONS dVW NOI1VOOl 3IjI33dS e`er
V,
f ^
AYM—d0-1NDItl OOOBO
J ^
i
F-�
is 9
..AVM—d0-1HDI II 001390 �\\\\\\\\ ��
DIGESTER GAS LINE — 18 INCH STEEL PIPE —)) A 1
WITH FUSION BONDED EPDXY COATING F16ER-E+- mi mumCAB TRENCH LE�TFI�
L4' MINIMNM [DYER
INDUSTRIAL WATER LINE — 18 INCH DUCTIVE IRON PIPE -- I,'I"r -,+L CAF
FIBER OPTIC CABLE — 4 INCH PVC PIPE ENCASED IN CONCRETE 00 -
�Ir3" FVC—� EFLPSJ6E+:T
e_ma
w
J
POWER POLE- \ cc 5
2
i3 g
V+ J
is 3
J W Q
N N
viO o q
30
I
20 1
10 -
o � 1
41
N 4
BO 63 4 20 0 1 vo 40
PROPOSED UTILITY LINES(INTERPLANT
INTERPLANT UTILITY CORRIDOR GAS LINE, INDUSTRIAL WATER LINE,
1201NTERPLANT PIPELINE AND COMMUNICATIONS LINE
FIGURE 4
The project has an estimated construction cost of about $25-$26 million depending
upon its final configuration (a pipeline or a box conduit) exclusive of the cost of lining the
two existing pipelines.
Installation of a 120-inch interplant pipeline (or equivalent box conduit) would
require removal of only the existing 42-incb pipeline. From the P1-33 junction box (near
Garfield Avenue), a distance of approximately 5,000 feet, the pipe would run between the
66-inch and 84-incb lines. At this point, the 42-inch pipeline siphons underneath the
- 66-inch. For the remainder of the run the 66-inch line is between the 84-inch and 42-inch
e (see Figure 5). The 120-inch line would have to follow the course of the 42-inch pipeline
and change positions with the 66-inch line. This arrangement would require a siphon
structure. From the siphon structure to Plant No. 2, the 120-inch line would run within the
westerly portion of the Districts' right-of way (see Figure 5). Cross sections for the 120-
inch pipe and equivalent box conduit, north and south of Adams Avenue, are shown on
Figures 6 and 7, respectively. The effluent junction box currently under construction has
been designed for connection to a 120-inch interplant pipeline. An option with this
alternative is to line the 66-inch pipeline.
The interplant utility corridor has many restrictions and obstructions,both above and
below ground. Power poles, street crossings, a limited 30-foot right-of-way, crossing of
existing and future utility lines, and existing buried pipelines all contribute to the difficulty
in constructing an interplant corridor. Obstructions and restrictions below grade will present
similar problems to both the cast-in-place box conduit and pipeline designs. The cast-in-
place box conduit design presents a more flexible approach to construction above ground
and may make restrictions imposed by the limited right-of-way and overhead power lines
more manageable. A final decision on which alternatives will be chosen will be based on
costs and environmental considerations. A constant slope resulting in a 6-foot grade
difference is proposed resulting in the pipe being installed above grade south of Adams
Avenue, requiring a 2-to 3-foot terrace and import of cover material to provide up to 5 feet
of fill. This terrace adjacent to the river levee will reinforce the levee.
2.3.2 Digester Gas Pipeline
Digester gas is collected from the digester at each plant and piped to compressor
stations. The compressed gas is used as the prime fuel source for boilers, aeration blowers,
gas compressors, and engine-driven pumps. With the completion of a new 17-MW central
generation facilities, the digester gas will be used as fuel to generate electricity for use at
the treatment plants. Each plant has a 51,000 cubic foot, high pressure digester gas storage
sphere. The spheres are interconnected with approximately 20,000 linear feet of 6-inch
polyethylene pipeline constructed in 1974 which replaced an older 4-inch ABS plastic
pipeline which was abandoned in place. The interplant digester gas pipeline allows digester
gas from Reclamation Plant No. 1 to be used at Plant No. 2 (or vice versa) to balance the
�— supply and demand, resulting in more efficient digester gas utilization.
The existing interplant digester gas pipeline does not have sufficient capacity to
handle the increased gas flow and must be replaced by a larger line. A new 18-inch steel
pipeline is proposed to transport the master-planned capacity of digester gas production at
Plant No. 1 with a maximum pressure drop of approximately 5 psig. Such a pipeline has an
9
POWER POLE
POWER POLE K
U
u j
30 709C 30
FENCE
i
20
20
0
1 O 10
1 I
V
0
BO 60 4 O 0 20 40
BO GO 40 20 0 20 40 - TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
CROSS SECTION(230OFT NORTH OF ADAMS AVE) (SOUTH OF -DAMS AVE)
FIGURE 2.2 3
FROM JOB NOS. 1-6-1, I-4R
FIGURE 2.2-2
LEGEND
p li GAS
T COMM. CABLE
• (ABANDONED)
NURSERY
13 PLANTS EXISTING PIPELINE ALIGNMENTS
NORTH AND SOUTH OF ADAMS AVENUE
FIGURES
L-T
u-
u C_ C _ i` _ C . r r t- F- U r T-
r
_ N2Wen pq.E.
w
1 n
r � (
0p o A
.r 50
20
+ I .
10
r
q � I
r DO
6 a 20 0 •0
INTERPLANT UTILITY CORRIDOR
r 12011HTERPLANT PIPELINE
rIWEE No.2.2-•
POWER rom y
111 d 3
W 6 2
N Z
r 3 I c a 4
o � �
SO
r
I
1
20
r
10
w
9-1O 6 •0 20 0 a0
r '
INTERPLANT UTILITY CORRIDOR
'-- 120-INTERPLANT PI-ELINE
r1 (SOUTH OF ADAMS AVE)
HBIwE�0.2Y6
yw
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
NORTH AND SOUTH OF ADANIS AVENUE
FOR 1261NCH PIPELINE
FIGURE 6
r
L
w I
POw Ery PoLE\ W
a
w 3 S O
l7 a� p Z 4
30 Z U u
t�
20
I U
10
I
II L
0
40 20 0
0 40
i
INTXRPLA NT UTILITY CORRIDOR
9�-6(W)% g=d(H) CONDUIT
(EQUIVALENT TO 120" PIPE) L
FOWEP. POLE\ < L
w ¢ Z ¢ V
f-
o E q
30
Z V L
L
20
y
10 '
^I N
m
0
4'0 20 0 O 4.0 L
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
INTERPLANT UTILITY CORRIDOR NORTN AND SOUTN OF ADAMS AVENUE
120°INTERPLANT PIPELINE FOR BOX CONDUIT
(SOUTH OF ADAMS AVE) FIGURE?
estimated construction cost of $1,450,000. Because the central generation engines require
�.J higher fuel pressure than the pressure rating of the existing storage spheres, these spheres
would not be able to be used as storage after the startup of the central generation facilities.
The size of the pipeline may be reduced under roadways to facilitate installation.
2.3.3 Industrial Water Pipeline
Plant No. 2 presently does not have a piping system strictly dedicated for distributing
industrial water. A new industrial water system is needed to service applications which are
presently being served by either the city or plant water system. These applications include
seal water, chemical mixing water, landscape irrigation, wash down water, odor scrubber
make-up water, etc.
Direct service of the Green Acres water to the Plant No. 2 industrial water pipe
network may not meet the Districts' needs if insufficient pressure exists as now proposed
during daytime hours. Presently, the Orange County Water District (OCWD) intends to
provide its users with at least 20 psi of pressure provided during the daytime hours and
65 psi during the nighttime hours. Although the pressure at Plant No. 2 may be slightly
higher,the operating pressure would still be well below the 85 psi required working pressure
in Plant No. 2's city water distribution system.
A new 16-inch industrial water pipeline size is proposed. The size is based on the
available pressure from the Green Acres project and the projected industrial water demands
for Plant No. 2 of 4.186 mgd peak flow and 1.04 mgd of continuous flow under master
planned conditions at an influent of 240 mgd.
The pipeline could be installed within the Districts' right-of-way from the Green
Acres pipeline just south of Adams Avenue to the City Water Pump Station (CWPS) at
Plant No. 2(Figure 8). An alternative is to obtain water directly from Water Factory 21 via
a connection at Reclamation Plant No. 1 and construct a new line directly between Plant
No. 1 and Plant No. 2 which would provide the pressures needed and reliability needed for
wastewater plant uses (Figure 8).
The proposed project would divert a portion of the Green Acres flow through the
CSDOC right-of-way to the existing CWPS on the west portion of Plant No. 2 (see
Figure 8). There the flow would be air gapped and pumped into the new industrial water
piping network An industrial water pump station and distribution network would have to
be constructed at Plant No. 2. The estimated construction cost for this alternative is
$2,280,000. This includes the 16-inch transmission pipeline, an industrial water pump station
at Plant No. 2.
2.3.4 Existing Interplant Communication Facilities
Transmission of data between Plants No. 1 and No. 2 is currently achieved through
two copper (twisted-pair) communications cables. These cables, which are directly buried
in the interplant corridor, meet today's requirements for minimal exchange of data between
J plants. With the process expansions at both plants and a planned control and monitoring
r
10
FOUNTAIN VALLEY \ FOUNTAIN VALLEY
aue AyE Due
TIP
VILA.'
w GDOC NO.1 PLANT NOA
OMialU U.RiIIID
S
iq
HUNTINGTON HUNTINGTON
BEACH BEACH
Q GREEN AGES
PIPELINE
.OtW .Y.Yt
COSTA MESA S o a•INDUETIIIAL
WATER PIPELINE COSTA MESA
ls'INDUSTRIAL Z s g
WATER PIPELINE
vxrar. vcralu
xMRmx .Y¢rox
eatWA
WATER -` e
PEN Csooc
PLANT NO.s
GDOCHcsoocwt,, LOCATION OF PROPOSED
OEENNIYBIOR.Y^_ DEEWNYNtlRANdYI NO e l
ALTERNATIVE I ALTERNATIVE 0 INDUSTRIAL WATER PIPLENE
MOE al FIDIIIIE42 ALTERNATIVES
FIGURE 8
C-_" 11 C I"_ I C_ [, C C"_. C IL C— t-- C
system to transmit all operational information between Plant No. 2 and Plant No. 1, a much
greater transmission capacity and speed is needed.
,. It is proposed to place one fiber optic cable, containing 12 fiber strands between the
plant control centers of both plants with a total length of 24,500 feet and place one
intraplant fiber optic cable from each control center to its associated central generation
facility. The fiber optic cable between the plants would be pre-loaded in a 1-inch inner duct
and placed below ground in a new conduit system to be constructed within the interplant
corridor. At the treatment plants, the cables will be routed through existing utility tunnels,
,. and few additional on-site facilities will be needed.
This proposed project provides flexibility with reasonable safeguards, along with the
lowest initial first cost ($96,694) and minimal installation impacts.
3.0 SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT'S
AND MITIGATION MEASURES
3.1 SUMMARY
Table 1, "Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures," has been
provided to facilitate the certification process of this supplement. The mitigation measures
shown are recommended for adoption and which may require either project modification
or the fulfillment of specific conditions in order to satisfy statutory obligations for the
requisite components of an environmental impact report.
32 PROJECT CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
Two different preliminary construction schedules for the proposed project are shown
in Figure 9. These schedules are subject to change depending upon the contractor's
proposed method of installation. The schedule is based on either a one-year or a two-year
mobilization starting at Plant No. 2 and extending easterly towards Reclamation Plant No.1
and completing the segment from Plant No. 2 to Adams between June and October of 1991.
Work would resume from Adams Avenue to Reclamation Plant No. 1 the following April
and be completed by the fall. The work has been carefully scheduled to provide for
- compatibility and lack of conflicts with EMA's SARMP which has been carefully planned
.. through a series of monthly coordination meetings.
33 AREAS OF CONTROVERSY
w
The proposed alignment is close to residential areas and will have some significant
adverse impacts of a short-term duration during the construction period.
11
Table 1. Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Page 1 of 4
Impact
Impact Significance
Impact Category Environmental Impacts Significance Mitigation Measures After Mitigation
Land Use In general, temporary (short-term) reduced PS Scheduling of construction during off- NS
access to private and public properties,localized peak traffic horns, as feasible. Com-
noise and fugitive dust increases during con- pliance with all applicable noise
struction. ordinances. Cover dump trucks and
spray down dirt piles.
Property owners adjacent to affected portion of PS Advance notification of construction NS
the Santa Ana River would suffer construction routing and scheduling.
impacts during construction of the interplant
pipeline.
to Population and Proposed improvementswould facilitate popula- S Land use planning, growth manage- S
Housing lion and employment increases, in accordance ment, and environmental protection
with adopted local general plans,CSDOC 1989 measures are the responsibility of
Master Plan and Regional Air Quality Manage- other agencies.
meat Plan. Secondary effects on air quality,
water quality, transportation, biological
resources, cultural resources, utilities, public
services, energy, natural resources, noise, and
solid waste management would result from such
growth.
Transportation/ The Santa Ana River bikeway will be tem- PS Traffic control plans will be prepared NS
Circulation porarily disrupted during construction activities. for the project to determine the most
Also local businesses will be impacted for short effective combination of alignment,
periods of time. scheduling, warnings, detouring, etc.,
that will maintain maximum access
throughout construction activities.
Close coordination with the City of
Huntington Beach and all local
agencies responsible for the affected
circulation routes will occur in the
preparation of these plans.
r U( 't'- U- r._ r- t- V U_ U_ U- I- E_ c- U- U- rJ_ � �
Table 1. Continued
Page 2 of 4
Impact
Impact Significance
Impact Category Environmental Impacts Significance Mitigation Measures After Mitigation
Utilities Numerous underground and overhead facilities PS The Sanitation Districts have coor- NS
could be disturbed or rerouted during construe- dinated project design with the
tion involving trenching or other excavation. Underground Service Alert of
Such disturbances are not expected to result in Southern California and all local utility
temporary loss of service to utility customers. purveyors to determine the precise
locations of all potentially affected
utility facilities. Plans for alternate
service, if needed, have been devel-
oped. Facilities that must be rerouted
will be done at CSDOCs expense if
the particular utility purveyor has prior
rights.
Public Services Temporary (short-term) access restrictions PS Preparation of traffic control plan prior NS
during project construction could increase to construction. Provide advance noti- S (Growth Induced)
emergency response times for police, fire, and fication of construction schedule to
paramedic services. Secondary impacts due to emergency service providers.
increased population,housing,and employment
will include need to expand public services
(schools,fire,police,medical,library,transpor-
tation, solid waste management, water and air
quality management, general government).
Plant and Animal Construction of temporary road in the Santa NS Replace existing landscaping destroyed NS
Life Ana River bed and along vegetated portions of during construction.
the river levee would destroy existing vegeta-
tion, resulting in destruction of local wildlife
habitat and temporarily disrupting birds and
mammals in thou areas. No rare or
endangered species are found in any project
area.
Table 1. Continued
Page 3 of 4
Impact
Impact Significance
Impact Category Environmental Impacts Significance Mitigation Measures After Mitigation
Hydrology/ A few drainage facilities will be crossed or he in PS Scheduling sewer construction during NS
Water Quality dose proximity to proposed sewer improve- drymonths. Coordinationwith Orange
ments. Stormwater control could be impeded County Flood Control District and City
if such facilities are disturbed during the rainy of Huntington Beach to protect under-
seasons. Open trenches and tunnels may be ground facilities, determine best
subject to groundwater infiltration, which will scheduling. Groundwater will be
need to be discharged properly. pumped and discharged pursuant to
the Sanitation Districts' NPDES per-
mit.
Excavated soil materials could degrade quality PS Prepare an Erosion Control Plan. PS
�.., of downstream waters if stockpiles are washed Adherence to standard sewer design
A off by stormwaters into nearby catch basins. and construction practices will mini-
Line rupture or blown manholes resulting from mize potential spills due to line rupture
seismic events could result in discharge of or manhole blowout
treated wastewater into underground or down-
stream waters.
Natural Minor and insignificant consumption of earth NS No mitigation proposed. NS
Resources and energy resources to manufacture pipeline
materials, operate machinery and equipment
during construction.
Geology, Soils, Project area is seismically sensitive. Severe PS Adherence to standard engineering and PS
and Seismicity ground shaking and unstable soil conditions sewer construction practices will mini-
could result in pipeline rupture or manhole mize potential damage to sewer faci-
breakage with discharge of treated effluent Mies during a seismic event.
underground or along ground surface and
possibly into downstream waters.
C IC_-- C- [-- t-- U_ r--, r- r- T-- t- r- c I--- r- U_( - C-
f t I , ► i
Table 1. Continued
Page 4 of 4
Impact
Impact Significance
Impact Category Environmental Impacts Significance Mitigation Measures After Mitigation
Cultural The proposed improvements follow previously PS Work will be halted if unusual mate- NS
Resources disturbed alignments. No effects on cultural rials found. Qualified professional will
resources are anticipated. be retained to examine materials,
record findings, and properly curate
any significant artifacts discovered.
Recreation Construction will temporarily disrupt the bike PS The Sanitation Districts will attempt to NS
trail along the Santa Ana River. design and construct the interplant
pipeline to include an alternate bike
trail routed around the construction
activities. The Sanitation Districts will
consult with the Orange County EMA
to develop the most acceptable
approach.
NS = No Significant Impact
PS = Potentially Significant Adverse Impact (Temporary)
S = Significant Adverse Impact
C.S.D.O.C., 1 -9 C.S.D.O.C., 1 - I
Oee CmmRlbp InomR lYro C..Wm Iladiry
CnnmeOm &5�
IMl IMJ --- IMI
Nu_ - _.__. I N A N�� A S _ N D P N A N L A S O NamA J I N A AI J J, A S O N D PIN A N # Ti—Fsr
ENDING — ♦DIMNO ------
ACrmi¢LV Dim _.......................................... ......................................... AGaWIm MNm ..............._........_.....................
. ....... .................................
Cmoan AwurJ ................................................. . ............................ ..........................._.._.......... ...... ..,,.... .... ......... ...
♦ ........ C.Awmn
SnapDrvwiRf _...... ..................................... ......................................... SNq Drvwi f
Rpe NanWunme Npe Ahnufanury —
MSTAM IW MCII PIPE ......................................_........ ..._......._....._.._................ ................................................. ....... .................................
OSIALL I301NC11 PIPE
................................................ ..... ................................... P ................................................. .........................................
OO6S Pwp 5WJm ♦ OOnS Pun Slntian
Crew,. ]ENO.. n-Im) ................................................. ..... ................—.......... Crew 3, 3800 M1.. 70'I&1 ...................................... ... ...............................,.........
MW 2ftm ................................................. ..............................I......... ...................................._........... ..._... ..........................
......
9 _. ...._ Pfmf 10ouumn
C ilw.4,n.. Gov mr •.......... .. cmr L f60o n.. ANIGq ..
Ilumillon Mmue
♦ C.I.n lon..
Crawl, IIW M1.. 60'/m .. ...___._.__ ............... Y ..................- ...._..._.. . . .. ........._.... .. .. ..._.,..
> .. Cmrl, IINR, 6o'Im
Ibmllbn Subfamn ................................................ ........................................ ........................................._.._.. ........ ....._._._._................
♦ Ilamilfm Sumfoum
........................._.............. ........................................ Y .........................—............ .........................................
Cmr I, JIDo M1., N'/m> Crew I, J)00 M1., ro'I m
NndeedA% ..... ......................... ............. ......................................... aknls nd ..................................... ...... ............................,...
.................................. ....... ......................................... Y ....................................—.... ...._._.......... .....................
Cm 1, ,..M1., N'/mY A I. JNo M1., rOVm
Ambf A.mue Ammf bmm
Am A,..CrvWm Am AremeCmwiry
Adam Armm Ammf Armm
C.. Ala 0., N'/mY ............... ■ Cm 3, AN h., N'Imr ■
cmm�.mswnp,e crvrm.n arvnnn
1. IS00 M1., MVm1 ................................................. . crew J, ISm O., lo'Imr
N.ft
N. mmar nrsAml .. .................._.......................... ' N.mnmm,'dsanml
x 1, Rao a., mr c N'I —................. mr . J300 n.. ID
E.J •I mr
—
E. maOnn D.. ♦ e.Jn�nim m
................................................ . .. .............. ................................................. ...............I....I....................
IMIIRR CONSI'RIICTION .... ........... fRIIER CONSTRUCTION
ILnm Pon Rdmtlm Powe Pole Rdmmn —
................................................. ........................................ ................................................. .........................................
MI Wtll Renoral 04 WdIRwortl
................................................. ......................................... ................................................. ........ ................................
CORM OF ENGWEERS CORrs OP RB
SumAm R.Ruml .......................................................................................... Sum Am.R.R.R.eAl ................................................. .........................................
Am R.Rmm 1 Am i
........................................................................................ ................................................. .........................................
Sum Sopfo 0.Raan
_c� AWubm
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
FIGURE 9
C- t C t- [- t-. t- . t-. t- Z __ t- t-- t i C i_ f
Carl's Jr. and a gasoline service station at Hamilton Avenue and Brookhmst will be
impacted.
The Southern California Edison Company will have to relocate a number of electrical
transmission poles.
4.0 RELATED PROJECTS
w
A related project which will be occurring in the same time frame as the proposed
interplant pipeline and utility project is the Santa Ana River Mainstem Project (SARMP),
a major regional flood protection project which has been in the planning and design stages
for the past 26 years. This project is now in the final design stages and is scheduled for
construction beginning in April 1991 in the portion known as Reach 1 which is from Pacific
Coast Highway to approximately 200 feet south of Adams Avenue (See Figure 3). Reach
2, extending from 200 feet south of Adams Avenue to the San Diego Freeway is scheduled
for construction in July 1992. These projects will involve construction in the vicinity of many
d of the Districts' existing trunk sewer lines which lie buried beneath the SAR at various
crossing points. Also, the Districts have had to work closely with the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (COE) to avoid construction conflicts with the construction of new sewer lines
such as the Baker-Gisler Interceptor (Ultrasystems, January 1990).
The project involves numerous project elements including construction of the Lower
Santa Ana River Channel to provided 190-year level flood protection (protects against the
worst storm envisioned to occur in one-in-one hundred ninety years). The various project
elements have undergone both federal and state environmental review processes and
w approvals and a Record of Decision for the project was signed by the U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers (COE) on June 2, 1989.
A CEQA Statement of Findings and Facts in Support of Findings for the SARMP
was adopted by the County of Orange Board of Supervisors by Resolution F89-25 on
December 12, 1989. At the same time the County entered a Memorandum of Agreement
between the COE and the Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) to assume
responsibility for constructing those portions of the project within Orange County.
The OCFCD is acting as the local lead agency for the SARMP. The focus of the
CEQA assessment and Finding and Facts which are of interest to the proposed Sanitation
Districts project are the construction of the Lower Santa Ana River Channel to provide 190-
year level flood protection.
11
Features of the SARMP include the following:
o Eighty-four acres of enhancement lands for wildlife resources at the mouth of
the Santa Ana River(SAR)providing wetland habitat for migrating waterfowl
and the California least tern, a federally listed endangered species.
m
o Eight acres of wildlife mitigation lands at the mouth of the SAR.
16
.d
L
o Bicycle/hiking and equestrian trails along the Lower SAR Channel. t
Effects found to be insignificant in the Lower SAR include the impact on ground-
water, land use/recreation/social concerns, agricultural lands, paleontological resources,
aesthetics, and air quality/construction equipment emissions.
Effects determined to be mitigable to a level of insignificance include the following: 6,
o Sedimentation and water quality impacts from erosion.
H
o There have been erosion control measures and slope stabilization measures
incorporated into the project which include construction methods and t
reseeding. All necessary state and federal water quality permits will be y
obtained by the contractor constructing the project for dewatering activities.
o Dust suppression will include adequate watering (especially of haul routes)
and use of biodegradable dust suppressants.
Significant Effects Which Cannot Be Avoided include the following:
o Impacts on traffic. Haul trucks and other construction equipment moving up
and down the Lower River Channel shall be confined to the SAR Channel
right-of-way. Construction roads will be within the streambed.
o Bicycle trails along the lower river will be taken out of service. The vs
environmental commitment includes no mitigation, except for rerouting of
trails "as is possible" during construction. I
M
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES OF POTENTIALLY
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
b+
5.1 EARTH
5.1.1 Environmental Setting L
The project corridor which is some 18,370 feet in length is situated on the Orange
County Coast Plain which consists of a structural depression filled with rocks and alluvium
from the SAR which have been modified by differential subsidence and uplifting (Yerkes,
et al 1965). Sediment overlies bedrock which ranges in thickness from hundreds to
thousands of feet.
The area is underlain by soil of the Bolsa-Hueneme Association which include the
Hueneme, Metz, and Bolsa soils at the site. Properties of these soils are listed in Orange L
County's 1978 Soil Survey (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1978). None of the qualities -of these three soil types pose a limiting factor to construction of the proposed facilities.
17
u
The Plant No. 2 site lies adjacent to the mouth of the SAR at an elevation of about
nine feet above sea level. The site is relatively flat except for man-made structures which
include levees and walls for flood protection and drainage, landscaped mounds for visual
.; screening of facilities, and excavated sludge drying beds.
The undisturbed surface soils at the site are primarily Bolsa soils, which are a silt or
silty clay loam ranging in depth to 69 inches. Tidal flats and peat bogs historically covered
the site and were eventually covered over with alluvium of the SAR. Soils at Plant No. 2
have been extensively modified by ongoing construction and on-site burial of screenings and
grit. Soils in the area overlie what was originally peat bog, thus construction has required
extensive foundation work under some structures.
,2 Quaternary alluvial, colluvial and non-marine terrace deposits are found throughout
the Coastal Plain. During the last two or three million years these deposits have resulted
in accumulation of sediments in the lower SAR. Surface deposits consist of fine sand, silt
and clay underlain by permeable coarse sand and gravel.
No unique geological features have been identified along the route of the proposed
sewer project.
There are two existing oil leases (Karales Lease and the Channel Lease located on
land owned by the Districts at Treatment Plant No. 2 which are held by two operating
entities, Pacific Energy Resources (PER) and D.W. Elliott (DWE) respectively.
PER has a total of nine wells of which two are reported to be presently in operation.
DWE has a total of four wells, three of which are working. Production by these wells is
relatively low with the DWE lease producing approximately 31 barrels per day and the
Pacific Energy Resources producing an estimated 60 barrels per day.
These leases have been in effect for over 35 years and the lease agreements date
back to the early days of the Joint Outfall Sewer (JOS) system which was the predecessor
® of the existing County Sanitation Districts.
The Channel lease consists of two portions, a subsurface lease underlying the Santa
River Channel and a combined surface and subsurface lease on the joint outfall sewer
easement of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. The River Channel lease
was obtained from the County of Orange in 1942 and requires payment of a royalty of
16.667%. The lease on the Orange County joint outfall sewer easement was obtained in
1945 and requires a payment of a royalty of 20.5% of production from the subsurface of the
lease, or a "rental royalty" of 4.0% on the value of production from any adjacent area (i.e.,
the River Channel lease) underlying the sewer easement. Since the Elliott 'channel' wells
are all directionally drilled to produce from under the river channel, the effective royalty is
considered to be the sum of these two or 20.6667%. The royalties on the Karales lease are
d" reported to be 19.0767% and their assignments of royalties to a number of lessor interests
and overriding royalty interests which are included in this total. This discussion of royalty
interest is importance since it will be necessary to compensate the holders of these interests
for loss of future income if, and when, the operational interests are required and production
is terminated.
18
G
The Channel Lease has had four production oil wells completed during its history. J
Three of these, nos. 1, 3, and 4, are still in production. Well no. 2 is reported to have last
produced some natural gas in December 1994 and the last report of oil production was in
July 1979. Present owner (leasehold) (I)WE) has indicated a potential for developing y'
production at deeper sands underlying the Channel lease.
The Karales has only two wells presently in production. These are wells no. 5 and L
9. Well no. 1 has been shut down since 1989. Well no. 4 has not produced in more than
10 years and is currently in a "suspended status"with unknown mechanical problems. Well
no. 2 is currently idle but is understood to be waiting an opportunity for the operator to
complete a remedial program for running a replacement line, casing and subsurface pump
before being returned to production.
Seismicity. The project area has one local active fault zone. The Newport-Inglewood y
structural zone extends from forty miles offshore near Dana Point, inland through the City
of Newport Beach to the Cheviot Hills in Los Angeles County. The Newport-Inglewood
fault zone has displaced all rock older than the alluvial and littoral deposits and created a
barrier to the movement of groundwater(Poland, 1959).Another potentially active fault line
extends along the coast just north of Plant No. 2. L
The project area is located in a seismically active region. Major fault zones capable
of inducing seismic hazards in the project area include: the San Andreas Fault Zone
approximately 30 miles to the northeast; the San Jacinto Fault Zone; the Whittier-Elsinore
Fault Zone; and the Newport-Inglewood Fault Zone on the southerly edge of the study area
adjacent to the coastal areas between Laguna Beach and Corona Del Mar. With the
exception of the Whittier-Elsinore Fault,all of these major fault zones have been evaluated
as active and designated as Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones. However, the Newport-
Inglewood Special Study Zone extends only as far south as Huntington Beach, about seven
miles northwest of the Santa Ana River (California Division of Mines and Geology, 1976).
Other potentially active fault zones located within 60 miles of the study area include the San
Gabriel-Sierra Madre and the El Modino-Norwalk Fault Zones (Plocssel et al, 1972).
h
5.1.2 Project Impacts 4
The Sanitation Districts require the purchase and termination of production of these
facilities because they conflict with future needs identified in the adopted July 1989
Wastewater Master Plan which identified long-term expansion of Treatment Plant No. 2.
Oil and gas leases in California normally require the lessee to properly abandon all
wells and return the surface of the property to its pre-leasing state. In the case of
acquisition of the lease and mineral rights interests through condemnation, as proposed by
the Districts, this burden falls upon the acquiring parry. Originally the Districts did not L desire to acquire the mineral rights underlying the subject properties, but since the owners
of the mineral rights to the Karales lease are apparently the holders of title to several
surface well sites,it will be necessary for the Districts to acquire the mineral rights to obtain
full access to the surface. There will be costs associated with abandonment of the wells and V
lease lines and facilities the Districts would incur.
19 L
Abandonment of wells of a depth similar to those found in those of the Channel and
Karales (1,000 to 2,281 feet) have been estimated to cost $20,000 each if all the work were
accomplished at one time and no unusual problems were encountered (Babson and
.-., Sheppard, 1990). If any problems are encountered with the wells, the cost of meeting the
abandonment requirements of the California Division of Oil and Gas could easily rise to as
much as $100,000.
". There is obvious spillage of petroleum hydrocarbons which may have contaminated
the soils surrounding some of the facilities. Dismantling and removing the lease tankage,
flow lines, and other similar equipment will entail a contractor specializing in the disposal
of"hazardous materials." These removal operations will include the treatment and removal
of contaminated soil and can be handled through the usual bidding process once the wells
are abandoned and facility removal can be completed. Average value of the equipment is
minimal other than as scrap iron.
At its August 8, 1990 meeting,the Sanitation Districts' Board of Directors authorized
the General Manager and General Counsel to offer to purchase oil facilities, leases, and
- mineral rights at the appraisal prices from the following parties:
o D. W. Elliott
o County of Orange
0 Pacific Energy Resources (Karales Lease)
o Lessor Group
o Overriding Royalty Owners
m The General Counsel was authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings against
operators or leaseholders, if necessary, and staff was directed to solicit proposals for the
preparation of plans and specifications for abandonment and removal of the oil facilities at
Treatment Plant No. 2.
Pipeline and utility construction in general results in impacts that are short tern in
nature and are a function of the grading, excavation and compaction. The most significant
impacts to geologic and soils formations are related to whether materials are appropriately
replaced and compacted to form a stable base for the river levees and to support roadways
" which may overlie certain installed pipeline sections, such as bridge crossings, where the
pipeline will be installed by "jacking." Normally, once construction is completed, a
construction easement can be restored to its pre-construction condition.
The shore trench method, open cut method, jacking method and tunneling method
are the construction methods most likely to be utilized for the emplacement of pipelines.
The shore trench method is normally utilized when pipelines follow roadways. The
ultimate size of the pipelines determines the dimensions of the trench when considered with
the depth below the surface that the pipeline is placed. The crossing of major corridors,
such as Adams Avenue and Hamilton Avenue, normally employs the jacking method. The
use of jacking methods for construction does not disturb the ground surface significantly, but
is exceptionally expensive precluding its use for all but the most difficult applications. Open
cut and tunneling methods are generally utilized where excavation occurs on unimproved
portions of the corridor. The open cut method would create a wide swatch of excavation
20
L
along the pipeline routes, resulting in the greatest amount of disturbance to earth resources. J
Tunneling is another method which does not disturb the ground surface; however, it is the
most expensive method used for construction of a pipeline. The tunneling method will be
used where the pipeline crosses these major streets.
Pipeline interface with storm drain channels is detailed under the Hydrology Section.
Excavation and construction phases normally result in some erosion and salutation,
particularly when materials have been stockpiled. The resulting sedimentation and siltation
problems in adjacent streams and storm drains maybe expected in conjunction with
construction activities. It is contemplated that the majority of construction activities would
occur during dry periods and consequently would not be significantly impacted nor would
extensive erosion and sediments result. The requirement along the segments of the pipeline
for temporary off-site stockpiling may result in loss due to spillage and wind erosion; this
could eventually impact runoff quality through stream siltation.
A estimated 207,000 cubic yard of material will have to be excavated to accommodate
the removal of the old pipe and allow for installation of the much larger pipe and utility 1
corridor. Of this total, about 102,000 will be backfilled and the remainder removed to L
another location for use as fill. Finding a suitable location for the fill material will be the
responsibility of the contractor. The proposed plan calls for a constant slope to the pipe
which would result in it being above ground south of Adams Avenue. This would create the
need to construct a 'bench" against the level to cover the pipe. The bench construction
would utilize all of the surplus material from the excavation north of Adams Avenue
resulting in almost a balance of materials. If this is the case, there will be little surplus
material for disposal.
The interplant pipeline and utility project (Job No. I-9) will be under construction
for a time frame of approximately eight to nine months while at the same time the
SARMP - Reaches 1 and 2 will also be under construction for a period of approximately
18 months. It is expected that construction will proceed from Plant No. 2 towards Plant
No. 1. However, work could proceed from each end and the pipelines could be joined ey
somewhere in between the two treatment plants to facilitate more rapid completion and
allow for minimal conflicts with the major flood control channel improvements to be
underway at the same time. However, costs would be higher and coordination, inspection,
and equipment needs would be much greater. Equipment movement would be more
difficult given the conflicts with use of the top of the levee for trucks. 1�
Seismicity. Active fault zones [defined as faults which have moved in recent geologic b
time (up to approximately 10,000 years ago)] include those which are likely to move again. `
Potentially active faults (defined as those which, based upon available data, no known L
historical ground surface rupturing or earthquakes have occurred)which would show strong
indications of geologically recent activity. The fault zones represent a strip one-eight of a
mile wide on each side of the surface trace of the faults identified as active or potentially
active.
I
The location of facilities subject to ground shaking and seismic events does not pose
a serious threat to the operational facilities. Construction techniques will require that
pipelines are constructed appropriately to avoid the impacts of anticipated seismic events.
21
In the event of earthquake-induced ground shaking, some liquefaction and differential
settlement would be anticipated to occur, although the majority of the impact would be
related to facilities associated with the project pipelines. There are no active or potentially
.A active fault traces located in the study area,and consequently the potential for direct surface
fault rupture is remote.
5.1.3 Mitigation Measures
,., Excavation for the pipelines will be accomplished by open trench except in those
specific areas where tunneling or jacking is called out on the plans. The specifications will
require that all excavations be performed, protected, and supported as required for safety
and in a manner set forth in the operation rules, orders, and regulations prescribed by the
CAL/OSHA Construction Safety Orders. For all boring,jacking pits, or open excavations
which are 5 feet or deeper, the contractor will be required to obtain a permit from the
applicable agency as required by California Labor Code 6424. Also, for all trenches 5 feet
or more in depth, the contractor will be required to prepare and submit to the Districts a
detailed plan showing the design of shoring, bracing, and sloping or other provisions to be
made for worker protection as required by California Labor Code 6422. The project
geotechnical investigation will include soils-related design criteria for use in preparation of
and/or reviewing the plan. This will include such information as safe construction slopes,
lateral earth pressures for sheeting and shoring design, and the effects of adjacent surcharge
loads.
Excavation of an open trench will be limited to 600 feet or a distance necessary to
accommodate pipe installation in a single day which is expected to proceed at a rate of up
to 100 feet a day. This distance will be collective in length and will include open excavation
for pipeline and appurtenances and backfilling which has not been temporarily resurfaced.
The contractor will be required to control grading and stockpiling of excavated material in
a manner to prevent water from running into excavations. Obstructions of surface drainage
will be avoided and means provided for storm waters or surface drains to maintain
uninterrupted service. Free access will be provided to all fire hydrants, water meters, and
private drives during the course of construction.
`d The contractor will be required to provide and maintain at all times during
construction ample means and devices which will promptly remove and properly dispose of
all water from any source entering the excavations or other parts of the work. The
contractor will also be required to comply with the provisions of the Districts' NPDES
permit in disposing of water from the work. This geotechnical investigation will identify
those areas where groundwater is observed in borings and comment or methods of
dewatering which might be employed.
The specifications will require that all excavations be backfilled after pipe has been
w installed.
Street pavement and surfaces will not have to be removed for installation of the
pipe and no replacement will be necessary. Tunnelling under existing overpasses will have
to be done to avoid major traffic disruptions and this work will be done in a manner that
.�J meets the requirements of the agency having jurisdiction over the roadway.
22
a
After removal, all of the existing 42-inch concrete pipe will be either hauled to an
approved disposal site, or as appropriate, recycled and used for fill elsewhere. 1
Any asphalt pavement removed or damaged during construction (such as at the L
commercial center at Hamilton Avenue) will be replaced. F
V
Effective dust control will also be maintained throughout the job by the contractor.
Use of water or dust palliative will comply with standard specifications.
1✓
Geologic studies have been conducted by registered experts as part of the detailed
design prepared for the construction of the facilities by LeRoy Crandall Associates under l, I
contract to the Districts through JCE's design contract. The recommendations of these M
studies have been taken into account.
5.1.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
No unavoidable adverse impacts on geological resources are anticipated. y
5.2 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
5.2.1 Environmental Setting L
The SAR is the major natural drainage for the watershed. This river represents a
major flood threat to the highly developed coastal flood plain encompassing 100,000 acres L
containing about a million residents. To provide flood protection for both treatment plants,
the Districts rely on the levee of the river for flood protection. A major flood control
protection and improvement project is going to be under construction during the period 1 .
April 1991-April 1994 along the lower reaches of the SAR (County of Orange, 1989). The
Districts' proposed project is being carefully coordinated with these major modifications to
the flood control system to minimize potential conflicts in staging, assuring that the levee
system is minimally impacted, and that the proposed sewer improvements are compatible
with the final plans developed by the COE.
i
Orange County has an extensive coastal plain aquifer which is subdivided into various
subareas and subterranean units depending on local geologic structure. The aquifer
underlying Plant No. 1 is the confined East Coastal Plain Pressure Subarea. Its uppermost
unit is the Talbert (Bolsa) aquifer which has a high permeability (1900 to 2500 gpd/ft) and tr
relatively good water quality (300 to 1,000 mg/I TDS). However, due to extensive over
extraction of groundwater via wells, this aquifer has suffered from a rather serious seawater I
intrusion problem where seawater has migrated up to 3.5 miles inland into the aquifer. I„I
Mitigation of this seawater intrusion has been a major objective of the Orange County
Water District (OCWD) which manages the local groundwater aquifer.
The OCWD has purchased imported water from the Colorado River for surface
spreading to recharge the basin's depleted aquifers. More recently (beginning in the 1970s),
23
i.
the OCWD constructed Water Factory 21, adjacent to Reclamation Plant No. 1, for
advanced treatment of secondary effluent and subsequent reuse by injection (via a series of
injection wells in place along the Talbert Gap) into the aquifer as a hydraulic barrier to
�., seawater intrusion. A new wastewater reclamation project (Green Acres Project) involving
distribution of advanced treated wastewater for irrigation of schools,parks,golf courses and
other water users is scheduled for construction in the near future and there will be some
placement of this distribution system within the Districts' right-of-way easement near Plant
No. 2 (see Figure 8).
Groundwater underlying Plant No. 2 is similar to that at Plant No. 1; however, it is
more saline due to salt water intrusion and is nearer the ground surface. Flood protection
for Plant No. 2 is provided by a recently constructed 12-foot wall which surrounds much of
the plant site. This wall also serves as a visual and noise barrier to buffer surrounding
residential areas from plant operations.
On-site drainage at the treatment plants is contained and carefully managed to assure
that any potentially contaminated rainwaters are collected and pumped to the effluent
disposal system. Drainage along the pipeline corridor is minimal and consists of infiltration
or runoff to the lowest point. Groundwater levels are often high which requires dewatering
during construction. Dewatering operations either pump water to the treatment plant or to
on-site siltation basins prior to discharge to the SAR. Such a discharge is regulated by a
special blanket NPDES Permit for dewatering issued by the RWQCB.
The only water resources of concern, other than wastewater in need of conveyance
between the two plants is the dewatering of groundwater during construction and flood
waters, should they occur.
The SAR and Greenville-Banning Channel run north to south along the eastern
"q boundary of Reclamation Plant No. 1, with the Greenville-Banning Channel approaching
from the east and turning south just prior to the plant.
a
5.2.2 Project Impacts
The proposed pipeline and utility corridor will parallel the river levee and lie
partially within the levee as some of the existing pipelines do. If the pipeline cannot be
constructed entirely within the Districts' existing easement, an encroachment permit will be
required from the County EMA.
The impact of the proposed project on the flood control channels is limited to the
construction period. Upon construction completion the levees will be returned to their
normal operating capacities and in conformity with the new plans and requirements of the
COE and County EMA.
y
The major modifications of the flood control facilities in the lower river will be going
on during the same time-frame. This other project may result in the temporary (up to three
w years) relocation of the SAR bikeway along certain stretches of the river south of the San
Diego Freeway and, in particular, the section from Adams Avenue to the Coast Highway.
�✓ Alternatives to closure include the construction of a temporary bikeway in the riverbed
24
,y
(which will be used by heavy equipment) or to divert bikers to Brookburst Street or some
other local surface streets. No final decisions have been made, and the Sanitation Districts' �✓
project is likely to have only short-term impacts of several months duration. Depending
upon the final plans developed by the COE, mitigation of bicycle and trail use impacts may .+
be developed as needed and if feasible based on specific restrictions of use of certain
portions of the project corridor. A recent accident between a Caltrans truck and a bicyclist
on the levee bicycle trail has brought further attention to the potential conflicts between rt
construction activities and recreational activities and prompted the COE to prohibit
temporary construction of a bikeway in the riverbed where it would conflict with heavy
equipment operation, y
Afoundation investigation was completed which included field exploration,laboratory
tests,engineering analyses,a corrosion study,and dewatering requirements(LeRoy Crandall L
Associates, 1990). Groundwater levels along the right-of-way were measured at six
monitoring wells which indicate water levels will vary with water presence and depth in the
adjacent Santa Ana River. Water was encountered at depths ranging from 15-1/2 to 27 feet r„
below the existing top of the embankment indicating a need for dewatering if the excavation
extends below the groundwater. ,
Construction will require site dewatering for installation of the new pipeline. Proper w
dewatering procedures as specified in a blanket NPDES Permit for dewatering must be
observed to minimize impacts on the SAR which may receive the dewatering flows after
treatment. Another dewatering alternative is to route the settled flows to the treatment
plant or outfall via one of the existing effluent lines or the newly completed interplant
pipeline. In either case, it would be necessary for the contractor to comply with all rules
and regulations of the RWQCB, SAR, and the CDF&G for any surface water discharge.
During the construction period, there are no anticipated times that process units will
have to be taken out of service to accommodate construction. This is of importance,
because the type of unit taken out of service and the time that it is out of service can greatly
influence the quality of the effluent being discharged to the ocean or the level of odorous
compounds which must be controlled. However, until final design is completed and a final
schedule developed, it will not be possible to categorically state that no process units will
be taken out of service. Should it become necessary to take process units out of service, the
Districts will take every effort to insure minimal degradation of receiving water quality. It
is not anticipated that any NPDES permit limitations cannot be met. Spills or bypasses to
the SAR are considered unlikely since the Districts have an unblemished record in recent
years of preventing discharges to the Santa Ana River from its emergency bypass.
Another area of potential impact is the possibility of breaking one of the existing
interplant pipelines (66- or 94-inch) now in use resulting in a spill of treated effluent. The
separation of the pipelines and careful construction should preclude such an occurrence.
If such an unforseen event occurs, immediate containment and repair would be required.
N
Use of the SAR bed and levees for construction equipment staging and transport or
storage of pipe is desireable, and the Sanitation District is requesting permission for a
construction easement to the middle of the river for such purposes. Construction is being �+
planned for the period from May, 1991 through October, 1991, with resumption of work in
March, 1991 and completion by August, 1992 with a schedule using one construction heading
25
from Plant No. 2 northerly to Reclamation Plant No. 1 (see Figure 2). If work were to
proceed simultaneously from two locations and break the project into segments, the work
could be completed in one season (Figure 2). However, the two heading schedules would
require extending work through November and the start of the rainy season. This could
_ result in some risk of unexpected storm impacting the project construction by filling the river
with flow, causing erosion of exposed soils and making access and excavation more difficult
in the wet soils. A final decision on how to proceed will be made once the bids are received
from contractors who must take the various methods and options into account. Since there
are several other major projects planned for the area (SAR Mainstem Project and the
,. Hamilton Avenue-Victoria Street bridge widening) careful construction scheduling is
necessary and close coordination with the County of Orange EMA has been ongoing during
project planning.
If construction extends into November, special permission to work in the riverbed
will be necessary. Also, special planning will be necessary to ensure rapid removal of
equipment or pipe and to provide for erosion control of exposed soils and trenches.
Use of the riverbed will require stricter controls to avoid spills of fuels (refueling in
the riverbed should be avoided). A contingency plan for rapid mobilization in the event
of storm will be required.
52.3 Mitigation Measures
Districts shall obtain an encroachment permit and comply with those measures
identified by the County of Orange, EMA for any encroachment outside the Districts'
easement.
Districts shall also comply with all measures identified by the COE for the levee
work that must be done on the SAR. Close coordination must be done to assure that the
project does not interfere with the COE major project to modify the SAR channel.
Construction will occur during the dry season and work in the river or on the levee
will be stopped once wet weather begins. All work which could potentially temporarily
impair the river levee will be completed by no later than November 15 and be subject to
approval of the COE and OCFCD.
Districts shall provide temporary construction bypass facilities as appropriate for
access to the SAR bicycle trail as allowed for by the COE and OCFCD.
A detailed dewatering plan will be developed and implementation and compliance
made a part of the construction contract.
�r Water Quality Mitigation. Refueling of construction vehicles shall not take place
within the riverbed.
+� A Contingency Plan for wet weather mobilization shall be developed by the successful
contractor subject to approval by the Sanitation Districts and County EMA for construction
which extends into November.
26
L
An Erosion Control Plan should be provided for containment of excavated materials,
protection of levees and for restabilization of tills and banks once construction is completed. L
Spill prevention and containment procedures should be specified in Plans and
Specifications in the event of an accidental pipeline break or unforeseen natural disaster.
Such procedures are outlined in the Sanitation Districts' Disaster Preparedness Plan. Lv
52.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
No unavoidable adverse impacts on water resources are anticipated.
53 BIOTA
�r
53.1 Environmental Setting
The area being studied by this environmental impact report is an urbanized area. V
Generally, all native vegetation in these areas has been removed and replaced with non-
native ornamental species which are frequently manicured.
Faunal diversity in urbanized areas is characteristically extremely low. However,
several animal species thrive under these conditions. They include, Anna's hummingbird,
starling, mockingbird, house sparrow, house finch,Brewer's blackbird,common crow,raven,
house mouse, and Botta's pocket gopher. The house sparrow, the starling and the house
mouse are introduced European species and are considered to be "nondesirable species"
that compete with native species.
Other than introduced landscaping,flora is quite sparse in the operations area of the
treatment plants. There are a large number of introduced trees, shrubs, and ground cover
which enhance the visual qualities of the site. Along the west side of the river levee are
large utility easements which are leased to wholesale nursery operations which raise large jr
numbers of containerized plants and trees.
Common weeds and salt-tolerant plants occur in moderate abundance in some j
locations of the riverbed. On the sides of the levee, New Zealand spinach, spiny amex, 4+
curly dock, Russian thistle, and mustard are common after the seasonal rainfall (COE,
1975).
Animals commonly observed at the treatment plant site in Fountain Valley, which
are likely to be found on occasion in the utility easement and river corridor, include the I
pocket gopher, California ground squirrel, skunk, red fox, and cottontail rabbit. Birds
sighted include many species of gull, crows, blackbirds, starlings, mourning doves, and
killdeer. No known rare or endangered species are known to inhabit the treatment plant 6 i
site or easement or depend on it for food resources, seasonal habitat, etc.
4.1
27
Other than introduced landscaping, flora is quite sparse in operational areas of the
Districts' easement.
No known rare or endangered species are known to inhabit the right-of-way and in
a field survey the only wildlife to be present were a lizard and commonly observed birds.
No known large mammal species appear to depend upon the corridor as habitat or depend
upon it for food resources, seasonal habitat, etc.
The general area is known to be inhabited by several species of special interest as
.e documented by a computer search of the records of the California Department of Fish and
Game's Natural Heritage Program (Natural Diversity Data Base search done May 3, 1990).
Two endangered bird species, the California Tem (Sterna albifrous brown) and
Belding's Savannah Sparrow (Passerculus sandwichensir), both on the federal and state
Endangered Species list, are known to nest in areas near the treatment plant site (City of
Huntington Beach, 1984,and California Department of Fish and Game, 1980). Endangered
species impacts have been assessed in the Master Plan EIR (Jones & Stokes Associates,
Inc., 1989) and in a more detailed assessment done as part of the Sanitation Districts
.. NPDES permit application filed with EPA in August of 1989 (KP. Lindstrom, Inc., 1989).
53.2 Project Impacts
The majority of the proposed sewer line route will be located in an existing barren
easement. As such, no impact to existing biota will occur. There is one section of the
proposed pipeline along the levee just north of Hamilton Avenue that has been extensively
planted with ice plant. This vegetation will have to be removed.
4' No impacts on any species of special interest are likely since the project site is not
near known habitats, and noise impacts will not impact these areas.
Use of the riverbed for construction will require destruction of seasonal vegetation
that takes hold in the wet middle portions of the river. Wildlife (such as ducks and other
waterfowl and wading birds) using this vegetation will be displaced to areas where
construction is not occurring. This impact will be temporary and not considered significant.
.. 533 Mitigation Measures
All trees and large shrubs removed as a result of the proposed project will be
replaced on a one-to-one basis.
Ice plant removed along the levee in the vicinity of Hamilton Avenue will be
replanted.
53.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
.� No unavoidable adverse impacts as to biota issues are anticipated.
28
L
SA NOISE
v
SA.1 Environmental Setting
Introduction. Noise can be defined as sound that is emitted at an objectionable L
level. Fundamental to an understanding of noise is an understanding of what constitutes
sound. Sound is a function of three factors: sound power, sound pressure, and sound
frequency. The sound power emitted by a source creates sound pressure waves, which are {,t
converted into audible sound.
Noise is characterized as a function of its sound pressure level (as measured in
decibels), frequency (as measured in Hertz or cycles per second), and duration (usually
measured in seconds or minutes). The sound pressure level is the perceived "loudness" of
a particular sound while the frequency determines the 'pitch." The human ear does not
respond equally to all frequencies of sound. It responds less efficiently to very low and
high frequencies than it does to moderate frequencies. There are three basic frequency 1I
adjusted (to weighted) sound levels: the A-weigbted sound level, the 13-weighted sound La
level, and the C-weighted sound level. Of these, the A-weighted sound level expressed in
A-weigbted decibels dB(A), is the descriptor that is almost exclusively used in noise
measurements relating directly to the human response to noise. The dB(A) is the noise L
level descriptor employed in this analysis.
Noise can be broken down into basically two categories: short-term and long-term. Ir
For the proposed project, short-term noise is the primary concern and will be associated
with the temporary construction activities. Long-term noise is associated with pipeline and
facility maintenance activities which may otter intermittently throughout the life of the j
waste management system.
Table 2 fists common noise sources and their sound levels at a fixed distance. Noise
levels decrease in direct proportion to the hearer's distance from the source. L
v
:i
L
L
i
�u
L.i
29
I
Table 2. Typical Sources of Community Noise
r
Source Sound Level, dB(A)
r
Leaves rustling 10 - 15
Quiet residential street 40 - 52
150 - 200 feet from dense traffic 55 - 70
Edge of highway with dense traffic 70 - 85
Noisy street 84 - 94
Jet plane at 1,000 feet 100 - 105
50•hp siren at 100 feet 130 - 135
Source: EPA, 1976.
Project Setting. Measurements of day and night ambient noise levels have been
taken at several locations in the vicinity of Plant No. 1 (CSDOC, 1977). These surveys
showed that daytime noise levels along the residential property line bordering Ward Avenue
_- to be in the range of 50 to 55 dB(A) and nighttime noise levels to be in the range of 44 to
51 dB(A). Major contributors to ambient noise levels include the San Diego Freeway and
traffic on local surface streets such as Ward and Ellis Avenues. Treatment plant operations
themselves do not generate much noise. For example, off-site noise levels in the vicinity of
Ward Avenue have been recorded in the range of 47 to 53 dB(A).
r
The proposed project consists of a narrow utility corridor construction project which
will traverse an alignment close to both commercial establishments (wholesale nurseries,
two gas stations, a fast-food restaurant and a small liquor-deli), parks, and several hundred
residential dwellings and apartments.
Daytime noise levels in the residential community adjacent to Plant No. 2 are in the
range of 55 to 60 dB(A) while nighttime noise levels range from about 45 to 60 dB(A).
Noise levels on Brookhmst Street immediately adjacent to Plant No.2 have been estimated
r to range from 65.5 to 69.0 dB(A) (median values) at a 50-foot distance from traffic
(Ultrasystems, Inc., 1977). Noise levels at the treatment plant site itself are highly variable
depending on the level of construction activity. Treatment plant operations themselves do
r generate limited noise and, therefore, noisy processing equipment is enclosed in buildings
to prevent community noise problems. Occupational exposure to noise is minimi d through
the use of hearing protection devices in areas where high noise levels occur (i.e., outfall
pump station).
Noise levels are subject to control via local ordinances. The City of Huntington
Beach ordinance is contained in Chapter 8.4 of the City Municipal Code. This ordinance
designates noise zones, establishes standards (basically set at 55 dB(A) from 7:00 am. to
10:00 p.m. in residential areas. There are special provisions exempting construction
30
r
Ld
activities provided a permit is obtained from the City and activities do not take place
between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.
1
Ya
5A.2 Project Impacts
The implementation of the project will result in the generation of short-term noise
attributable to the alignment construction activities. Long-term noise will be associated with
future sewer maintenance/repair activities which is considered a minor, if not negligible,
activity.
5.4.2.1 Construction Related Impacts
L
Construction noise levels will exceed background noise level by a considerable
margin. The exact degree of impact on the surrounding community will depend upon the
type of equipment used and hours of operation. However, noise levels associated with the jr
construction are expected to range from 70 dB(A) to 105 dB(A) within 50 feet of the
equipment being used (see Table 3). Jackhammers for demolition of the existing pipe, pile
drivers for installing sheet piling, and use of cranes and pipe movers along with cement
trucks will be the noisiest pieces of equipment.
Table 3. Typical Construction Noise Sources
dB(A) v
Distance from Source
Source Peak Level 50' 100' 150' 200'
M
Power Saw 100 85 79 73 67 {
Skill Drill 103 88 82 76 70 r
Heavy Trucks 95 84-89 78-83 72-77 66-71
Pickup Trucks 92 72 66 60 54
Concrete Mixer 105 85 79 73 67
Jackhammer 108 88 82 76 70
Scraper 93 80.89 74-82 68-77 60-71
Dozer 107 87-102 81-96 75-90 69-84 L'
Paver 109 80-89 74-83 68-77 60-71
Crane 104 75-88 69-82 63-76 55-70 i
Loader 104 73-86 67-80 61-74 55-68 u+
Pile Driver 105 95 89 83 77
Fork lift 100 95 89 83 77
Source: Golden, et al, 1979.
31
u
A portion of the equipment working at this site will be within 100 to 150 feet of
some residences. Therefore, intermittent noise levels as high as 90 dB(A) could be expected
at these homes. Noise levels of this magnitude would be considered an annoyance.
Therefore, it is likely that without special precautions and mitigation, construction at this
site may at times increase local noise levels to unacceptable levels.
Cumulative impacts from short-term construction noise impacts will be those related
to the SARMP improvements which are expected to extend over a three-year period. In
comparison to this project and its magnitude, the Sanitation Districts' project will be of a
short-term and temporary nature.
5.4.2.2 Operational Impacts
The completed project will not generate operational noise other than the occasional
need to drive service vehicles along the access road to inspect the sewers via access
manholes or to perform routine maintenance such as line cleaning.
5.4.3 Mitigation Measures
All construction equipment shall be stored on or near the area under construction
to eliminate daily heavy duty truck trips on vicinity roadways.
All construction equipment, stationary or mobile, shall be equipped with properly
operating and maintained mufflers, and all engines shall be kept in proper tune.
Construction activities shall be restricted to the hours of 7 a.m.to 7 p.m. on weekdays
subject to obtaining a construction permit from the City of Huntington Beach, as
promulgated by the applicable local jurisdiction; also, no construction shall be permitted
outside of these hours or on weekends or federal holidays unless a waiver has been granted
by the Project Manager. Any waiver shall take into account the impact upon the
community.
Construction activities should not commence before 7:00 am. nor extend past 7:00
p.m. or the hours stipulated by local ordinances or permits, whichever are most restrictive.
Noise levels should not exceed 65 dB(A) at the nearest residential property line as a result
of construction activity except for short periods of time as provided in local ordinances.
Noise levels should be monitored during construction to ensure ordinance compliance and
worker safety.
W On-site noise monitoring equipment will be used by the construction managers to
ensure compliance with the contract provisions which are specified.
I
32
i
5A.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
Unavoidable adverse impacts from noise generation can be anticipated even after
the implementation of mitigation measures due to the close proximity to residential areas
and the nature of the equipment used.
L
5.5 LAND USE
U
5.5.1 Environmental Setting
The project route parallels the westerly side of the SAR for approximately 18,370 L
feet. Residential uses are the predominant land uses in the area. There are also a few
commercial uses and recreational uses such as the equestrian trail and local parks which
border the Santa Ana River (Figure 2). V
5.5.2 Project Impacts L
The project will result in the removal and replacement of only a minor amount of
vegetation and pavement in order to accomplish the construction of the facilities. Due to iw
the complete urbanization of the surrounding area and the previous disturbance of the
project sites, no significant impacts are expected. The proposed use will be compatible with
the other existing uses in the area since the pipelines will be beneath the ground surface. u
There are no ingress/egress routes for residences or businesses which will be blocked
due to construction. L
Project construction will last at least six to seven months. Construction will proceed
from both ends of the project and the pipelines will be connected approximately mid-point.
Utility construction will proceed as follows:
Project impacts primarily occur during the construction phase and therefore are 4d
temporary. It is expected that the pipe can be installed at a rate up to 100 feet per day,
so any one area will not be affected for any longer than a few days by the construction
equipment. Truck traffic may occur over a much longer period given the limited site access. 4
Construction of the pipeline will cause minor disruption to residential and small
businesses near the intersection of Hamilton Avenue and Brookhmst Street where tunneling
under the overpass will be required and extensive modifications to local flood control
facilities (removing four pipelines, constructing the sewer line and replacing them) will V
occur.
The parking lot for the gas station and Carl's Jr, restaurant on this comer will also
be temporarily impacted. Construction will require the closure of the restaurant outdoor L
seating and bicycle parking area. At least one ingress/egress will be kept open at all times
33
to allow for use of the majority of the parking lot. Interruption of this parking lot is
expected to last several weeks.
.. In order to proceed along the proposed route encroachment permits or easement
rights for construction will be required from several private and public agencies such as the
Southern California Edison Company. Additionally, an encroachment permit will be
required by the OCEMA for crossing of several OCFCD pipelines.
A utilities encroachment permit will be required by to construct and maintain
facilities underneath Adams and Hamilton Avenues.
The proposed realignments, after the attainment of all easements, do not create
effects which are significant as to land uses. If an easement is not obtained for a particular
section of the pipeline, then an alternative alignment must be used.
..
5.5.3 Mitigation Measures
.. Access to private properties will be maintained during the construction phase of the
project.
All easements must be obtained prior to construction occurring along that portion
of the route.
5.5.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
Because of the temporary nature of construction and lack of visibility upon project
completion, no unavoidable adverse impacts are anticipated for land use issues.
5.6 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION
5.6.1 Environmental Setting
Access to project area is primarily via Brooldrrst Street which is a six-lane major
-+ arterial with a raised median except for the area south of the plant where it narrows to four
lanes near the Pacific Coast Highway (PCH). Vehicular traffic averages about 18,000
vehicles per day. Other major access roads perpendicular to Brookhurst which have
crossings over the SAR include Adams Avenue and Hamilton Avenue and PCH (Figure 2).
Access to the project site would be provided by various access roads through residential
areas which include Garfield Avenue and Atlanta Avenue, all of which are shown on
Figure 2.
There are two major street crossings (Adams Avenue and Hamilton Avenue) which
will be impacted.
34
.y
L
5.61 Project Impacts ' .i
Traffic impacts from the proposed project,while of a temporary nature, may last for
ff ju
months as a result of deliveries of materials (pipe or concrete) to the job site, hauling o
construction debris (old pipe which will be removed), and surplus soil.
Roadway impacts are expected to be minimal. To avoid traffic disruptions, it is L
planned to jack the sewer pipeline under these roadways. A Traffic Control Plan has been
developed for the project and traffic impacts can be more clearly defined. The potential L
traffic impacts from the proposed Traffic Control Plan for the project are discussed below.
Construction of the sewer facility would be divided into segments which would
minimize the impacts on existing traffic circulation. Construction would proceed from the
Huntington Beach plant, moving along the river levee easterly towards Hamilton Avenue.
Construction activities are not expected to interfere with the normal flow of traffic on local
surface streets or to affect areas where there are schools. Construction-related activities
could create unexpected hazardous situations.
Construction of the sewage conveyance system will necessitate applying for an L
encroachment permit in order to allow for the tunnelling under Adams Avenue and
Hamilton Avenue.
Construction activities associated with the proposed project will not impact public bus L
services to local residents and businesses in the area. Bus stops will not be blocked and L
bus routes not be displaced due to construction activities.
5.6.3 Mitigation Measures L
The following mitigation measures are contained in the Traffic Control Plan Concept
prepared by John Carollo Engineers: L
Construction signing used for the handling of traffic for public convenience shall
conform to the latest edition of the Work Area Traffic Control Handbook (WATCH)
published by Building News, Inc. and the Caltrans Manual of Warning Signs, Lights, and L�
Devices for Use in the Performance of Work upon Highways, which will be included in the
specifications. In addition, the signing, barricading, and diverting of traffic shall be subject L
to the approval of the authority with jurisdiction over the street (City of Huntington Beach).
The contractor will be required to maintain a 24-hour emergency service to remove, install,
relocate, and maintain warning devices.
In addition, the following mitigation measures are recommended: L,
o Signs shall be posted in advance of the construction period to warn motorists L
of the beginning date of the construction period. These signs shall be posted
on the affected arterial to advise motorists to use alternate routes.
V
o A plan shall be prepared to safeguard school children at any impacted school
crossing zones. Temporary school guards (if not available at the affected �L
35
crossings), flashing signals and other devices shall be considered at locations
along the sidewalks or street crossings where construction activities and
pavement conditions might cause new safety hazards to school age children.
,r The school district should be consulted in the preparation of contingency
measures to protect school children.
o Affected property owners and business shall be sufficiently notified in advance
of construction.
o Replacement parking for temporarily displaced private parking shall be
considered.
o Parking for construction employees shall be arranged in the project staging
areas or in designated areas approvable to local City officials.
o The Traffic Control Plan for Construction shall designate the responsibility
.. and incorporate provisions for daily supervision of construction traffic safety
including inspection of detour plans, signing and safety problems.
o Construction through parking lots and easement areas will be phased and
scheduled so as to minimize disruptions to existing uses.
o Prior to the implementation of construction an application for a "Utilities
Encroachment Permit" shall be sent to the County of Orange and the City of
Huntington Beach. Comments from the various departments of these entities
shall be incorporated into the final plans.
5.6.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
Construction activities in the parking lots south of Hamilton Avenue for the service
station and local businesses could potentially have a significant adverse effect on these
businesses, whose clients use this area. However, implementation of the proposed
mitigation measures would reduce the impact to a level of insignificance. The reduction in
impact is due to the short-term construction activities, maintaining ingress/egress to the
parking lot at all times, and scheduling construction to occur during periods when the
parking lot is least used.
5.7 AIR QUALITY
5.7.1 Environmental Setting
Air quality in the Sanitation Districts' service area is generally poor, with pollutant
levels for various constituents exceeding federal and state standards, making the South
Coast Air Basin a designated nonattainment area under the federal Clean Air Act. A
detailed discussion of air quality is contained in the regional and subregional air quality
J
36
management plans. Locally, the air pollution problem of greatest concern to Sanitation r
Districts personnel and nearby residents is odors. �J
Odor impacts at the treatment plants became an increasing problem to the Sanitation L
Districts in the late 1970s and early 1980s as the size of the facilities increased and
residential and commercial land uses encroached on the plant site. During that period, the
number of odor complaints grew. L
To evaluate and seek additional means of controlling odor from treatment
operations, in 1984 the Sanitation Districts completed a major study of odor control and
have since implemented several projects to reduce odor impacts. The use of chlorine,
caustic soda, and the odor facilities for odor control is a major expense. There has been a
major effort to enclose or cover facilities with the potential to generate odors. Such efforts V
as retrofitting all existing facilities and covering all existing primary clarifiers are being
completed at a cost of more than $20 million as environmental mitigation adopted as part
of the 1985 master plan and its accompanying EIR. Since odor mitigation has been !L
implemented, odor complaints have declined.
In addition, the Sanitation Districts have undertaken a major electrification/ L
cogeneration project to make full utilization of the methane gas produced from sludge
digestion. This project will result in a significant decrease in air pollutant emissions. L
5.7.2 Project Impacts
The largest potential impact on air quality is related to pipeline excavation and earth
moving. Transportation requirements to bring workers and materials to the site and to haul
off surplus earth and demolition debris will also contribute to air pollution in the region. L
These activities will emit dust and air pollutant emissions well in excess of those
which normally occur. L,
Heavy construction equipment such as trucks, tractors, scrapers,backhoes, and other
equipment powered by internal combustion engines will emit a few pounds per day of
various air pollutants. Based on standard emission factors for this type of equipment the
estimated typical emissions would be as shown in Table 4.
L
L
I
y
L
`ft-,
37 L
Table 4. Average Emission Factors for Heavy Construction Equipment
(Pounds Per Hour Per Piece of Equipment)
Pollutant Emission Factor
Carbon Monoxide 0.760
Exhaust Hydrocarbons 0.203
Nitrogen Oxides as Nitrogen Dioxide 2.871
RCHO as HCHO 0.049
Sulfur Oxides as Sulfur Dioxide 0.205
Particulates 0.156
Source: Golden, et al, 1979.
Vehicular emissions during construction would be relatively minor on a regional
scale. It is estimated that the construction period would last at least nine months and that
during this time frame emissions would be generated by construction activities including
workers commuting to the site. This temporary construction activity may result in localized
air quality degradation and contribute to the increase in emissions within the air basin.
Such emissions can be expected to contribute to deterioration of air quality which already
exceeds many existing applicable standards. Long-term compliance with standards is being
addressed on a regional scale, and the Districts' facility plan and individual projects are
'r reviewed to determine consistency with air quality planning goals and objectives.
Once operational and in use for conveyance of effluent from Plant No. 1 to the
Outfall Booster Pump Station, the pipeline is not expected to generate odors because of the
high quality of the effluent. Past experience has not shown that these pipelines and their
manholes (where air is vented) pose any odor problems.
Construction of the pipeline and utility corridor will occur within 100 feet of
residences and businesses along some portions of the river. If uncontrolled, dust emissions
as high as 110 pounds per working day (i.e., during the excavation process) could be
generated. Watering from two to four times per day would reduce the dust emissions
approximately 50 percent. However, the 60 pounds per working day that would escape
could be a nuisance factor to those residences that are immediately adjacent to the
construction site.
L Emissions from construction activities have been estimated using emission factors
based on the use of diesel-fueled equipment and the amount of soil which must be
excavated. These estimates are shown in Table 5 for the average day and for the entire
minimum 180-day period over which peak excavation activity is expected to occur. Added
to these emissions will be those associated with hauling any surplus material off site and
bringing materials to the site which may be extensive considering that as many as 1825-
38
5,236 truck trips may be required to complete the job requirements. The higher end of the
range involves hauling all of the surplus earth from excavation from the site rather than use
it to reinforce the levee or make it available for use for the SARMP which will be underway I
after the pipeline is constructed. L
Table 5. Emissions Associated with Demolition and Excavation L
and Hauling of Materials
L
Hauling of Materials
Demolition and Excavation (Worst Case) L
Contaminant Average Day 180-Day Period Average Day 180-Day Period
(lb/day) (lb) (lb/day) (lb)
Particles 9.5 1,713 3.5 636 Ir
CO 47.2 8,494 77.5 13,953
HC 2.10 379 1.23 223
NOx 261 47,002 1,743 8,763
sox 16.4 2,962 7.6 1,370
Assumptions: 207,000 cubic yards of soil excavated and 102,000 backfilled; 3,200 cubic L
yards of concrete excavated and removed off site an average of 10 miles one
way. Fuel use 5 mpg or 0.27 gallons per cubic yard.
i
This source of air pollution is very minor compared to the overall regional air
pollution burden. Vehicles used by workers and vehicles moving equipment and supplies L
to the site and those used for hauling off the excavated 42-inch pipe and surplus earth will
also contribute to the overall air pollution burden of the area. However, as is the case of L
the construction equipment, the emissions will be insignificant on a regional scale, and most
likely, on a local scale.
The soils investigation at the site has indicated a relatively high level of natural
organics (peat, etc.) which may give rise to odors (H,S and other organic gases) if deep
excavation is required. Also, excavation of the existing abandoned 42-inch pipeline could
expose odorous materials. This material should be excavated quickly such an event occurs u
to ensure that odors are minimized.
Air Quality Management Plan Conformity Determination. The SCAG has made a
preliminary determination in responding to the NOP that the proposed project is"regionally
significant' and hence subject to a conformity determination according to recently issued
guidelines (SCAG, 1990).
39
r
5.7.3 Mitigation Measures
Both dust and gaseous pollutant emissions can be reduced by simple control methods.
,r During excavation, watering should occur on a daily basis as needed for dust suppression.
As previously stated, watering on a regular basis (i.e., two to four times per day)can reduce
dust emissions by about 50 percent. Gaseous pollutant emissions from vehicles can be
reduced by the use of well tuned and properly maintained equipment.
The proposed pipeline (Project I-9, Joint Outfall Sewer replacement Project) to
r replace and upgrade an antiquated pipeline to transfer treated wastewater from Reclama-
tion Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley to the Ocean Outfall Booster Station at Treatment
Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach for discharge to the ocean through the submarine outfall.
The proposed project has been addressed in the Sanitation District's 30-year Master
Plan and Program EIR adopted in July 1989 which identified a 30-year program for phased
wastewater facilities to serve the Sanitation District's service area and various wastewater
contracts with other entities. Flows used to estimate facility needs were based on adopted
local government land use plans and population growth forecasts used by the Sanitation
Districts are similar to SCAG's 1988 Growth Management Plan GMA-4 Modified forecast
and within the identified range of potential future growth scenarios. The Sanitation
Districts' forecast is 72,622 persons lower (2.38%)than SCAG GMA-4 modified population
in the year 2010. SCAG has determined that this forecast is appropriate for use for long-
term planning.
The Sanitation Districts staff have worked closely with SCAG staff on the develop-
ment of the conformity handbook for wastewater for the AQMP and will continue to be
involved in the development of the 1991 AQMP revisions. The Sanitation Districts have
also worked with the South Coast Air Quality Management District on implementing
various rules and regulations which impact the Sanitation Districts and in permitting
activities for new facilities. Through these efforts, a good working relationship has
developed and there is a high degree of cooperation in trying to achieve both water quality
and air quality objectives without conflicts.
Based on what has been done to date for CEQA compliance and planning, the
Sanitation Districts have determined that the Interplant Pipeline Project is consistent with
the AQMP. It is not included in the Regional Transportation Improvement Program or
identified in the Regional Mobility Plan because it is not germane. To assure continued
compliance with air quality goals, the Sanitation Districts will work cooperatively with the
various cities within its service area to encourage them to adopt, implement and enforce
various elements of the AQMP for which they have authority to implement. This process
.r is only now beginning, and to aid in this effort, the Sanitation District anticipates hiring
additional staff to continue this effort.
40
5.8 RECREATION _I!
5.8.1 Environmental Setting
The are several parks and trails located along the pipeline route, adjacent to the II
SAR. No other recreational areas have been identified along the proposed pipeline route. U
These facilities are shown on Figure 2.
The major development which borders the river between Hamilton Avenue and
Adams Avenue is Merideth Gardens. Within this subdivision lies LeBard Park where there
is a major recreational area with tennis courts, a park, and bicycle trail access. Also located
at the LaBard park area is the Huntington Beach High School District Education Center. L
This and a former school site located on Yorktown Street should not be impacted. The
former school site, now used for an administrative center has been proposed as a major
staging area by the Corps of Engineers due to its fenced yard and location with access to
the river via Ward Street and Garfield Avenue (see Figure 2).
i
5.8.2 Project Impacts L.
Implementation of the proposed project will require temporary closure and relocation L
of a portion of the SAR bikeway from Adams Avenue to Treatment Plant No. 2. It was
proposed to construct a temporary bikeway in the riverbed and to provide an inclined access
trail at each end to connect to the unaffected portions of the bike trail. However, the COE
will be operating heavy equipment in the riverbed and will not allow the bike trail to be
placed in the riverbed. Thus, bicyclists will have to be diverted to local surface streets. The
County of Orange EMA has been working on various alternatives for routing bicyclists
during construction of the SARMP. The proposed plans are to be announced later in the
summer of 1990. The Districts' project will only impact a small portion of the bike trail and
mitigation measures are dependent upon the decisions of EMA and the County of Orange
Parks and Recreation Department who controls use of the bike trail. V
The major areas through which access to the site will occur are not likely to adversely
impact local traffic patterns, use of recreational facilities, or schools or school crossings. r�
5.8.3 Mitigation Measures N
During construction, a minimum 7-foot chain link fence shall be provided to provide
safety for local recreational users of the local parks. After construction,permanent facilities u
will be constructed as part of the SARMP.
The Districts propose temporary facilities to mitigate for loss of use of the bike trail. �+
This could consist of a temporary bike trail in the river bottom or diversion to surface
streets with temporary trails. Final plans will be dependent upon County requirements. I
�L
41
5.8.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
There will be unavoidable adverse impacts to recreational activities during project
,. construction with disruption of the existing bike trail.
,r 5.9 UTILITIES
There are numerous utility conflicts which occur along the proposed pipeline route.
An extensive effort to locate all public and private utilities has been completed. The only
existing or proposed underground utilities that could conflict with the proposed construction
,r are shown in Figure 10 and listed below.
5.9.1 Electricity
5.9.1.1 Environmental Setting
.. The Southern California Edison Company (SCE) provides electrical service to the
project area. SCE has major overhead (65-KV power lines)facilities along the project route
which lie within the Districts' 30-foot right-of-way. These power poles were acquired from
the Districts by SCE under the terms of a 1977 agreement. The Districts' retained the right
to request SCE to relocate any of the poles or power lines if required to a new location
within the Districts'right-of-way, otherwise the Districts would have to pay for acquiring any
new right-of-way and for relocation of the SCE facilities. The relocation process if required
is expected to take six to nine months and cost as much as $400,000.
5.9.1.2 Project Impacts
Some of SCE's overhead power lines have been placed within the Districts'easement
s and these will have to be relocated. The location and description of these facilities is
depicted on Figure 10 and described below.
(1) CSDOC facilities including the following:
0 6-inch diameter digester gas pipe
o communication cable
0 66- and 84-inch diameter sewage pipes
0 42-inch diameter sewage pipe
0 electrical cable
0 4-inch diameter gas pipe (abandoned)
(2) City of Huntington Beach:
o Storm drain force mains from Merideth Pump Station
�+ 0 Storm drain force mains from Huntington Beach Pump Station
0 24-inch water line
42
.y
u
PLANT NO. I COMMUNICATIONS CABLE
N
GARFIELD ST. 6• GnS uNE ®31 POWER POLES
88' PIPE S PIPE V
14- GAS LINE q6' PIPE NURSERY PIPE
O
u
ADAMS ST. 24" WATER PIPE L
o pp
5 W p STORM WATER u
P S FORCE MAINS
O 36" RECLAIMED WATE
U 30" H.P. GAS
ATLANTA AVE. • . 16 POWER POLES L
2 POWER POLES
0 1 POWER POLE
5 W Q STORM WATER
p 5 J FORCE MAINS
a..
tY 2 ELEPHONE DUCTS L
HAMILTON AVE. Ld
Z L
CABLE TV
O ®15 POWER POLES L
EXIST. 12" AND
PROP. 30" L
BANNING AV___fE. WATER PIPES
L
PLANT N0. 2 0 X 6 I PIPES POWER POLES
LEGEND L
® 4 POWER POLES
• 11 POWER POLES
• OILWELIS L
O MONITOR WELLS
® POWER POLES TO BE RELOCATED LOCATION OF UTILITIES L
X POWER POLES TO REMAIN IN PLACE
O. POWER POLES TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE FIGURE 1D L
JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS L
K2 ENVIRONMENTAL
PLANT NO
GARFIELD ST.
NURSERY PIPE
O
ADAMS 5T. 24" WATER PIPE
w
O O
�p g y� p STORM WATER
b1 P S ir FORCE MAINS
tY 36" RECLAIMED WATEF,
p 30" H.P. GAS
V
ATLANTA AVE.
0 ~
S W Q STORM WATER
P S J FORCE MAINS
Q—
HAMILTON AVE. H -
Z
CABLE TV
O
EXIST. 12" AND
PROP. 30"
BANNING AVE. WATER PIPES
7
PLANT N0. 2 • OIL PIPES
•
•
LEGEND •
• OILWELLS INTERPLANT PIPELINE AND
0 MONITOR WELLS UTILITY CORRIDOR
NOTES
CSDOC PIPING IS FIGURE -jA,
NOT SHOWN. 10
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
L
(3) City of Newport Beach:
0 12-inch diameter sewage force main
0 12-inch diameter water line L
0 30-inch diameter water line
I
(4) Twelve Pac-Tel telephone conduits in a bank under Hamilton Street LI
(5) One 30-inch diameter high pressure gas main in a 36-inch diameter casing
under the river at Atlanta Street extended. This pipe is owned and operated L
by Southern California Gas Company.
i �
(6) One 6-inch diameter Chevron Oil pipe and a West Newport Oil Company Lr
pipe inside a 26-incb diameter O.D. casing pipe south of Banning Avenue
(7) Cable TV wires at Hamilton Avenue L
(8) One private pressure pipe from the adjacent nursery to the river ;
(9) Three operating and one abandoned oil well and the pipes connecting them L
to the header collection system.
L
(10) Four Orange County groundwater monitoring wells. One of the wells has a
6-inch pipe which discharges into the river.
(11) One Orange County Water District 36-inch diameter greenacres reclaimed
water pipe.
The proposed sizing and pipeline route revisions as well as construction of the L
proposed sewer line will not significantly increase electrical consumption.
For safety considerations, some segments of the power lines can be de-energized for LJ
safety during construction. If the lines are not de-energized, then the contractor must stay I
away from them with equipment. L
5.9.13 Mitigation Measures
An electrical facility relocation plan has been developed by JCE in conjunction with
SCE. This work will precede the construction work being done by the Districts. The
proposed plan includes the following relocation of power poles: L
Effluent Junction Box (EM) Near Garfield Avenue to Adams Avenue
o All the SCE transmission, distribution, and communication poles within this L
segment of the right-of-way should be relocated to a location 5 feet inside
the west boundary of the Districts' right-of-way. Except the 13 poles
immediately north of Adams Avenue should be relocated to a location outside _
the right-of-way to accommodate construction. SCE can place them back into
�L
43 I
L
the right-of-way between the existing 66-inch pipe and the 120-inch pipe
following construction if desired.
Atlanta Avenue
o One pole on the transmission power line crossing the Santa Ana River is in
direct conflict with the proposed pipeline location. SCE should relocate this
pole 20 to 22 feet to the east where it can be protected in place.
,r Atlanta Avenue to the SCE Hamilton Substation
o There are about four poles which are not in service and do not support any
,r conductors. These poles should be removed by SCE.
o Behind the Hamilton Substation there is one pole supporting a guy down wire.
SCE should relocate and move this guy wire and its anchors to accommodate
I-9 construction.
.. Hamilton Avenue to Banning Avenue Extension
o All existing poles should be relocated to a location 5 feet from the west
boundary of the Districts' right-of-way or on a line extended toward the north
from the power poles south of the future extension of Banning Avenue.
Within Plant No. 2
o The guy wires of the existing H frame transmission pipeline will have to be
relocated to accommodate construction. One power pole at the end of the
" transmission line leading from the south will need to be relocated 5 feet east.
Its location could be set 35 feet to the south to accommodate better access to
the new pole location.
All excavation activity related to the proposed project shall be performed in such a
way as to protect all existing electrical lines which do not have to be relocated.
The applicant shall coordinate with SCE to ensure that existing electrical service will
not be interrupted during project construction. The need for relocation of electrical lines
is still being evaluated and negotiated with SCE. If electric power lines are not de-ener-
gized, then the contractor should be required to keep all equipment 11 feet or more away
from the existing transmission conductors and 10 feet or more away from distribution
facilities.
5.9.1.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
No unavoidable adverse impacts as to electricity issues are anticipated if the
continued cooperation of SCE is obtained to relocate facilities and temporarily de-energize
some lines during construction.
44
r
5.92 Natural Gas
5.92.1 Environmental Setting
it
Natural gas is supplied to the study area by Southern California Gas Company
(SCGC). A 30-inch diameter natural gas distribution line runs across the Districts' right-
of-way at Atlanta Avenue. L+
5.922 Project Impacts
L
Excavation activities related to the proposed project could potentially disrupt existing
gas services provided to the immediately surrounding areas. i ,
LL
5923 Mitigation Measures
Detailed planning has been done to identify all underground activities and coordinate L j
for avoidance, relocation, or temporary shutdown. -
All excavation activities related to the proposed project shall be performed in such L
a way as to protect the existing gas line.
5.92.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts L
No unavoidable adverse impacts as to natural gas issues are anticipated. 1 1
5.93 Water L
593.1 Environmental Setting L
The two major sources of domestic water to Orange County are the Metropolitan
Water District of Southern California (MWD), which delivers imported water from the
Colorado River and from Northern California, and the groundwater basin of the Orange L"
County Coastal Plain, which is managed by the OCWD. Additional sources of available
water include surface runoff and reclaimed water which are used only for landscape or
agricultural irrigation.
Water distribution in the City of Huntington Beach is provided by a 24-inch water
main in Adams Avenue.
The City of Newport Beach has an existing 12-inch main and is installing a 36-inch L
water line at Banning which will cross the Districts' proposed pipeline alignment.
The City of Huntington Beach pumps stormwater to the SAR from two stations IJ
along the corridor (1,200 feet north of Adams Avenue and at the northwest comer of
Hamilton Avenue).
L
45 1
5.93.2 Project Impacts
Excavation activities related to the proposed project could potentially disrupt existing
water services at Adams Avenue.
The stormwater pipes from the City of Huntington Beach will have to be perma-
nently relocated to accommodate construction of the new pipe and be routed above the
pipeline once it is installed. It will change their elevation by an estimated 3+ feet and
result in a slightly higher hydraulic pumping requirement.
5.933 Mitigation Measures
All excavation activities related to the proposed project shall be performed in such
a way as to protect all existing water lines.
Prior to the relocation of any existing water lines, the cities of Newport Beach and
Huntington Beach shall be contacted. No relocation of water lines is required for the
proposed project so specifications on relocation will not be included in contract design
documents.
5.9.3A Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
No unavoidable adverse impacts as to water issues are anticipated.
5.9.4 Sewers
d
5.9.4.1 Environmental Setting
The study area is served by County Sanitation Districts Nos. 3 and 11. The existing
sewage collection and treatment facilities are discussed in the Master Plan Program EIR
(Jones & Stokes Associates, Inc., 1989).
There are two other major interplant sewer lines operated by the Districts within the
construction easement. No other sewer lines or planned sewer lines are located in this area.
The other major sewer line constructed across the corridor is the 12-inch diameter steel
force main suspended below the south side of the Hamilton Avenue bridge.
.. 5.9.4.2 Project Impacts
The need for the proposed project is related to the increased flows expected to be
treated in the future at Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley, California.
-+ Excavation could potentially disrupt existing sewer service in the immediate vicinity.
The proposed pipeline alignment, however, has been selected to minimize disruption to
existing utilities. As a result, no major utility relocations are anticipated.
46
L
5.9.43 Mitigation Measures
All excavation activities related to the proposed project shall be performed in such ,
as to protect existing sewer lines. L
5.9.4.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts L
No unavoidable adverse impact to sewer issues are anticipated.
u
5.9.5 Telephone
5.9.5.1 Environmental Setting L
Telephone service within the project area is provided by General Telephone or
Pacific Bell. Twelve telephone ducts are owned by Pacific Bell and are present under the L
Hamilton Avenue bridge. Only two of the ducts are used, and they carry outdated copper
pipe and will be replaced with new fiber optic conductors when the new bridge is built.
5.9.5.2 Project Impacts `
Construction resulting from the proposed pipeline alignment is not anticipated to
affect existing Pacific Bell service lines. No major utility relocations are foreseen at this `
time.
5.9.53 Mitigation Measures V
All excavation activities related to the proposed project shall be performed in such
a way as to protect existing telephone lines. L
The applicant shall provide Pacific Bell the opportunity to review final construction
plans. The applicant shall provide Pacific Bell six months advance notice of construction L.,
activities in the event that any relocation may be required. Any relocation of telephone
line shall be in a manner specified by Pacific Bell. it
V
5.95.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
No unavoidable adverse impacts are anticipated for telephone services.
5.9.6 Oil Wells and Related Facilities 6W
5.9.6.1 Environmental Setting L
L
The 13 existing wells on the two leases at Plant No. 2 are described in Section 5.1.
L
'�-L
47 L
5.9.6.2 Project Impacts
The impacts associated with the purchase, abandonment, and removal of these wells
which conflict with the proposed facilities are discussed in Section 5.1.2.
5.9.6.3 Mitigation Measures
At its August 8, 1990 meeting, the Sanitation Districts' Board of Directors took
action to authorize purchase, abandonment, and removal of the existing oil wells and
prepare plans for removal. This would include assessment of the need for hazardous waste
removal.
5.9.6.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
Loss of oil production of up to 100 barrels per day would result from well
abandonment and removal.
.. 5.10 HEALTH AND SAFETY
5.10.1 Environmental Setting
The proposed pipelines are to be located within an existing residential and
commercial area. Traffic volumes in residential areas are typical of residential communities;
a traffic analysis is included in Section 5.6 Traffic Transportation and Circulation.
There are two schools in the proximate area of the proposed project:
5.10.2 Project Impacts
No extraordinary health and safety impacts are anticipated as a result of construction
of the proposed facilities. However, factors such as inconvenience, annoyance, and/or
vexation resulting from noise, dust, leaks, odor, spills, overflows of untreated wastewater,
and/or traffic congestion impacts addressed in previous sections may become nuisance
factors. The most significant nuisance conditions likely to occur is during limited periods
when tie-ins with existing facilities occur or when operations commence.
The introduction of construction activities in developed areas will create a degree
.. of confusion and congestion, each of which could enhance the potential for vehicular and
pedestrian conflicts. The crossing of intersections could require a narrowing of traffic flows
temporarily, that in turn could create confusion, congestion and potential conflicts unless
-r properly handled.
The open trench, any parked machinery, as well as any stockpiled dirt will appear
.� to be an attractive but dangerous play area to children able to reach the construction area.
If crosswalks are to be crossed by construction vehicles, this will provide a potential hazard
to young children.
48
L
The two schools will not be directly impacted by the construction zone for the
proposed trunk sewer and truck traffic and employee traffic will be directed to streets not
used by school children or where there are designated school crossings. Therefore, Ir
inconvenience to the schools is expected to be minimal. I
Pedestrian traffic near the schools will be a major concern, and special care will be L
provided to defer any danger and to provide proper safety measures for all children if
construction takes place while school is in session. The crosswalk located at Merideth Park
will also require special attention, as it gives access to the children from the south side of y
Atlantic Avenue to the north side.
In addition to these dangers, construction of the facility will intensify the risk of fire. Li
This could easily occur if construction equipment emit sparks in vegetated open spaces.
Although this risk is low in urban area, the probability is higher in the open space area. As
indicated in the Safety Element of the Orange County General Plan, these areas are L
assigned an average fire hazard classification.
Once constructed, the facilities should be structurally sound so as not to pose a L
danger during seismic activity and/or other public disaster.
5.103 Mitigation Measures L
To provide maximum safety for the residents of the surrounding residential Lr
developments as well as the general public, the construction specification will provide for
the erection of a minimum 7-foot chain link fence or other means of securement to preclude
unauthorized entry to any excavation during all nonworking hours (24-hour basis) including L
weekends and holidays.
While construction operations are under way, the contractor will be required to
provide means to protect the public from his activities and to restrict access to the V
construction site to authorized personnel.
Security will be provided at equipment yard areas and other dangerous sites, by the L
contractor.
A guard should be placed at all school crossings during normal school hours while L
construction is within 500 feet of any school crossing or if truck traffic on streets where
there are school crossings is required. i
V
The final design will investigate the interrelationships of the pipeline location,
vehicular traffic, and the school's schedule to develop specific requirements to avoid adverse j
impact to the school as well as the project facilities. 1�
Construction activities in the vicinity of identified school zones should be phased
during summer months or another time when the schools are not in session. r'
L
49 1
The fencing or other security measures around the construction area should preclude
entry to the stockpiled, machinery and excavation area.
In heavily developed areas or where appropriate, the excavated material will be
removed and stockpiled off-site to protect public safety when such action is necessary.
.+ Signs, lights and flagmen should be utilized as necessary to ensure safe, adequate
access for pedestrians and vehicles at all times when there is heavy truck traffic on local
surface streets.
.. Contractors shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations.
,r Every effort shall be made to minimize the impacts of odors when tie-ins are made.
Construction signing used for handling traffic and public convenience should conform
r to the State of California, Department of Transportation, Manual of Warning Signs, Lights,
and Devices for Use in Performance of Work Upon Highways, latest edition.
All signs should be illuminated or reflectorized when they are used during hours of
darkness. All cones, pylons, barricades or posts used in the diversion of traffic should be
provided with flashers or other satisfactory illumination if in place during bours of darkness.
The signing, barricading, and diverting of traffic should be subject to the approval
of the authority with jurisdiction over such public streets. The contractor should maintain
a 24-hour emergency service to remove, install, relocate, and maintain warning devices and
should furnish to the authority, names and telephone numbers of those persons responsible
for this emergency service. In the event those persons do not promptly respond or the
authority deems it necessary to call out other forces to accomplish emergency service, the
contractor should be held responsible for the cost of such emergency service.
The contractor should provide and maintain such fences, barriers, directional signs,
lights, and flagmen as are necessary to give adequate warning to the public at all times of
any dangerous conditions to be encountered as a result of the construction work and to give
directions to the public.
5.10.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
No unavoidable adverse impacts as to health and safety considerations are
anticipated.
w
5.11 AESTHETICS
5.11.1 Environmental Setting
The visual resources in the study area are primarily those associated with an
urbanized area. Currently only low-rise structures exist along the proposed route.
50
L
J
Land uses in the area of the proposed project consist of commercial, residential,
open space and roadways and equestrian/jogging/walking and bicycle trails.
L+
The study area vicinity is completely built-out. The construction area is bound by
residential (single- and multi-family) and limited commercial uses.
L
The only visual presence of the existing pipelines is from vent pipes and manhole
access structures.
u
5.11.2 Project Impacts
U
Visual impacts from machinery, trenching, and dirt pilings will occur along each
segment of the proposed alignment during the period that construction activities are in JJ
progress. The primary visual impacts from the construction will be short term; i.e., for the L
duration of construction. Typically, construction occurs along 50- to 100-foot segments in
a day with construction activities lasting three to five days considering excavation, 1
installation, fill, compaction, and regrading of the ground surface. L
The only long-term visual impact will be where the vent pipes and access manholes
and surface access ports to the utility corridor. L
The proposed realignment will not create any significant impacts that are different L
from those which presently exist.
5.113 Mitigation Measures L
Landscaping programs will be coordinated with sewer construction projects to re-
establish landscaped areas impacted by construction. L
Excess earth will be removed from areas of sewer or be recontoured in conjunction
with landscaping programs. Additional dirt may be imported to recontour the easement.
v
Excavation should be conducted with minimal grading of slopes. Revegetation of
disturbed areas should commence immediately after project completion. L
5.11.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts L
No unavoidable adverse impacts as to aesthetic issues are anticipated. i
L
I
51 1
60
6.0 GROWTH-INDUCING DAPACTS OF
THE PROPOSED ACTION
v
Pursuant to Section 15126(g) of the State CEQA Guidelines, environmental impact
reports shall include a discussion of the growth-inducing impacts of the proposed action,
^+ including a discussion of "the ways that the proposed project could foster economic or
population growth, or the construction of additional housing, either directly or indirectly, in
the surrounding environment".
.. Growth-inducing impacts may also include actions which remove existing obstacles
to growth.
The evaluation of whether the proposed project will yield growth-inducing effects
focuses on the consideration of several factors, including an assessment of whether the
project:
Provides a potential for population in-migration to fill project-related
employment opportunities which, in turn, could induce additional residential
development;
.„ Results in an increased localized demand for goods and services at
levels to induce additional commercial development;
Results in the removal of economic, physical or political obstacles or
constraints to development; and _
Facilitates peripheral development through the extension of services
to areas presently void of those services.
Short-term employment opportunities, associated with project design, development
and construction, and long-term employment opportunities, associated with the expansion
of the sewer infrastructure and the subsequent growth afforded the county and city service
.y area in housing, commercial and industry will result from project implementation.
Although, improvement and expansion of the sewer conveyance system is designed
.. to accommodate projected growth in the county and city service areas, implementation of
the proposed project will not in and of itself promote additional growth to the service areas.
The overall growth-related issues associated with the Sanitation Districts' 30-year
.. Master Plan which includes some $7.2 billion in facility improvements (including the
proposed project) to provide for service area growth needs and wastewater collection,
treatment, and disposal/reclamation needs were addressed in a July 1989 Master Plan FIR
(Jones and Stokes, Associates, Inc., 1989). Mitigation measures to be implemented by
other agencies to reduce the impacts of population growth and related impacts were
identified.
52
i«
7.0 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION
CEQA Requirements V
The State CEQA Guidelines, in Section 15126(d), require that in addition to the ��
proposed Project, a range of reasonable alternatives to the pending action be identified and L
evaluated which could feasibly meet the basic objectives of the Project.
Referencing the State CEQA Guidelines: W
The discussion of alternatives shall focus on alternatives capable of eliminating
any significant adverse environmental effects or reducing them to a level of LJ
insignificance, even if these alternatives would impede to some degree the
attainment of the project objectives, or would be more costly.
V
A specific "no project" alternative is mandated by these Guidelines. In addition to
the "no project" alternative, a reasonable range of alternatives to the proposed Project are
to be identified to foster informed decision-making. L
7.1 ALTERNATIVE 1: NO PROJECT L
This alternative would result in maintaining the project as previously approved. This L
alternative would create significant impacts to water quality since effluent capacity would
not be sufficient to transport treated effluent from Plant No. 1 to the ocean outfall for
disposal. Flows would have to be discharged under pressure to the old 42-in sewer line L
with the potential for rupture or leaks which could threaten the integrity of the river levee
through seepage and erosion. It would also result in contamination of groundwater and
possible flow of sewage into local surface streets, yards, etc. L
Therefore, the no-project alternative would not be an environmentally superior
alternative to the proposed project.
u
7.2 ALTERNATIVE 2: ALTERNATIVE PIPELINE ROUTE L
The reason for this alternative is to preclude the sewer line from the river levee
corridor. The alternative would be to route the line down a major local street, most likely
Brookhurst Street or Bushard Avenue or under the new river channel(in the bottom). This
is approved by EMA and COE. Such a routing would conflict with that proposed in the
Master Plan and design of the new Outfall Booster Pump Station. New in-plant pipelines
would have to be constructed and sewer routes developed. The impacts from construction
in surface streets would be no different in terms of noise and excavation requirements, but
traffic and health and safety impacts would be much greater. Costs for digging up and
repaving streets and relocating utilities night be much greater.
L
53
Yy
.. As a result of the above-mentioned impacts, this alternative is not environmentally
superior to the proposed project.
.. 7.3 ALTERNATIVE 3: ALTERNATIVE CONDUIT SIZES
a. There are two basic alternatives to conveying large quantities of treated wastewater.
These are a pipeline or a poured-in-place channel which is then covered. Pipelines have
been the most commonly used means of conveyance, but there are several other projects
now underway in Southern California where a box-type conduit has been used and found
to be less expensive to construct.
Both of these alternatives (for the proposed project sizing) were evaluated to
determine their costs and environmental impacts. There is a minor difference in the two
methods mostly related to excavation and materials.
Using this alternative conduit approach several different alternatives were considered
to provide hydraulic capacities, facilitate construction, and assess maximum use of the
existing right-of-way. These are described below.
Alternative sizes to the proposed conduit (either a pipe or a box section) were
evaluated by ICE and included the following:
73.1 Alternative Conduit No. 1
Place 5,000 feet of new 132-inch pipeline or equivalent box section from the Effluent
Junction Box (EJB) to a new junction box just north of Adams Avenue to operate in
parallel with the existing 84-inch pipeline to this point. Downstream of this point a new
120-inch pipeline would be placed to operate in parallel with the existing 66-inch and the
existing 84-inch pipelines. The existing 42-inch pipeline would be removed entirely and the
existing 66-inch pipeline would be removed from the EJB to the new junction box near
Adams Avenue. This alternative would provide a capacity of 319 mgd.
73.2 Alternative Conduit No. 2
r
Place a new 132-inch pipeline or equivalent box section for the entire length between
EJB and the Plant No. 2 OOBS station. This alternative would eliminate the need for a
new junction box near Adams Avenue. Removal of the existing 42-inch pipeline and the
existing 66-inch pipeline would be required for the entire length of the interplant pipeline.
This alternative would offer some additional capacity (37 mgd) over Alternative Conduit
No. 1.
54
u
733 Alternative Conduit No. 3
Some of the pipe manufacturers have offered a pipeline size of 144-inch at the same '
or slightly lower cost than the 132-inch pipe. Some additional capacity could be gained for w
future use by placement of a new 144-inch pipeline or equivalent box section for the entire
length. Removal of the existing 42-inch pipeline and the existing 66-inch pipeline would
also be required for the entire length of the conduit. The capacity of a 144-inch pipeline
or equivalent box would be 445 mgd. When adding the capacity of the 84-inch pipeline, a
total capacity of 542 mgd would be available. If the 84-inch pipeline was relined, this
capacity could be increased to 559 mgd. „
Another option available under this alternative would be to use the 84-inch pipeline i
as a utility tunnel for the newly proposed utility and future utility connections including
oxygen and sludge transfer pipes. The conceptual use of the 84-inch pipeline for this
purpose is depicted in Figure 11.
73.4 Lining Alternatives
Another altemative to increase capacity and extend the life of the existing 66-inch
and 84-inch pipelines is to provide retrofitting with a PVC lining and increase their
capacities by 9 mgd and 17 mgd, respectively. (See Table 6 for a summary of hydraulic
capacities of all alternatives with and without lining.) At present, there are no plans to
provide this lining, which can be easily accomplished with little impact once the new
interplant conduit is in place and sufficient capacity exists to take the existing pipelines out
of service to allow for such an installation.
7.4 SUMMARY OF CAPACITY ALTERNATIVES
A summary of capacities of the various pipeline alternatives and comparable box
conduits are shown in Tables 6 and 7.
V :
iyt
LJ
L
L+
55
V
ti
4
FIBER OPTIC CABLES INDUSTRIAL
WATER
DIGESTER
GAS
24"
SLUDGE
( FUTURE )
OXYGEN
(FUTURE )
INVERT 840
INTERPLANT
PIPE
PIPELINE
SUPPORT
( TYP)
.. UTILITY TUNNEL
CONCEPTUAL USE OF
THE 84-INCH PIPE AS
A UTILITY CORRIDOR
FIGURE 11
u
Table 6. Summary of Hydraulic Capacity of y
Interplant Pipeline Alternatives
i+
Existing Pipelines New Pipelines
66-inch 84-inch 120-inch 132-inch 144-inch Total L.
Proposed Project New 120-incb, existing 84-inch and 66-inch pipelines u
without lining 45 97 278 420 1
with 66 lined 56 97 278 431 y
with 66 & 84 lined 56 114 278 448
Altemative 1 New 132-inch, 120-inch, and existing 84-inch pipelines r,
132-inch to Adams then 120-inch to Plant No. 2
without lining 44 97 275 319 416 ,
with 66 lined 56 97 272 328 425
with 66 & 84 lined 56 114 272 328 442
Alternative 2 New 132-inch and existing 84-inch pipelines
without lining 97 356 453 L
with 84 lined 114 356 470
Alternative 3 New 144-inch and existing 84-inch pipelines L
without lining 97 445 542
with 84 lined 114 445 559
Table 7. Surcharged Capacities of Various Pipeline
and Conduit Alternatives
iy
Conduit Size Capacity (mgd) u
120-inch pipeline 278
9'-6" (W) x 9-0" (H) conduit 284 1_
132-inch pipeline 356
10'-3" (W) x 10'-0" (H) conduit 359
144-inch pipeline 445 _ Lr
11'-0" (W) x 11'-0" (H) conduit 444
56 I
r
A cost comparison of the proposed project and the three basic alternatives (based
on installation, materials, and removal of existing pipe) is shown on Table 8. The costs
are for PVC-lined pressure pipe or box conduits (not pressurized). An environmental
comparison is presented in Table 9.
r
Table 8. Cost Comparison for Alternative Conduits
Alternative No. Cost'
r
Proposed Project
120-inch pipeline $12,186,500
or
9'-6" (W) x T-0" (H) conduit $12,915,200
Line 66-inch pipe $1,400,000
Line 84-inch pipe $1,800,000
Alternative No. 1
Pipeline (132-inch and 120-inch) $13,818,500
or
_ Conduit (10'J' x 10'-0" and 9'-6" x 9'-0") $14,153,000
Line 66-inch pipe $1,100,000
Line 84-inch pipe $1,800,000
Alternative No. 2
132-inch pipeline $17,906,000
or
10'-3" (W) x 10'-0" (H) conduit $17,245,000
Line 84-inch pipe $1,800,000
Alternative No. 3
144-inch pipeline $23,000,000
r or
11'-0" (W) x 11'-0" (H) conduit $19,115,000
r
'Includes installation, materials, and existing 42Anch pipeline removal.
57
r
1 '
Table 9. Environmental Comparison of Conduit Alternatives t J
f.+
Alternative Alternative Alternative
Proposed Project 1 2 3 .
Land Use Lowest Moderate Moderate Highest use
use use use use L
Air Least Moderate Moderate Highest 1
impact impact impact impact y
Construction Materials Least Most
use use L
Cost Least Most
use use L
Constructibility Will depend upon equipment used and abilities of
contractor who has best bid proposed for the proposed L
contract.
L
7.5 INDUSTRIAL WATER PIPELINE ALTERNATIVE
h
r
One alternative considered includes receiving the Green Acres water at Plant No. 1,
air gapping the flow, then pumping it down the complete length of the interplant corridor t
and into the industrial water pipe distribution network at Plant No. 2 via an 18-inch
industrial water pipeline. The estimated construction cost for this alternative is $3,090,000
including the 18-inch transmission pipeline and an industrial water pump station at Plant L
No. 2.
7.6 FIBER OPTIC CABLE ALTERNATIVES L
7.6.1. Plan 2 - Dual Cables in Same Conduit L+
Place two fiber optic cables between Plants No. 1 and No. 2 in the same 4-incb
conduit with one between the plant control centers of both plants and a second cable L
between the central generation facilities on both plants. The on-site structural configuration
of the plants would be the same as the proposed project. The higher material costs result L'
in higher costs ($142,944) than the proposed project (costing $94,684). There are no
significant environmental differences between this alternative and the proposed project.
58
m\J 7.6.2 Plan 3 - Dual Conduit Alternative
W This alternative would provide two fiber optic cables between the plants,as in Plan 2,
but the cables would be routed independently so that each will run a different path, thus
providing additional protection from system failure due to external damage.
At Plant No. 1, the cables could,however, be placed on opposite sides of the existing
utility tunnels to gain maximum separation. A separate conduit structure for one of the
cables would be required at Plant No. 2.
The interplant fiber optic cables linking the two plants would be placed underground
in separate conduit runs constructed on opposite sides of the interplant corridor with
approximately 12-15 feet of separation between the two conduit runs. Costs are $169,784
for this alternative or some$75,000 more than the proposed project. Environmentally there
are few differences other than material consumption.
.. 8.0 THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOCAL SHORT-TERM USES
OF MAWS ENVIRONMENT AND THE MAINTENANCE AND
ENHANCEMENT OF LONG-TERM PRODUCI'1V=
Development of the project as proposed, and the cumulative and long-term effects
associated with the development, will result in the upgrading of the current Effluent
Conveyance System infrastructure and a better degree of reliability for meeting treatment
plant energy, water and utility needs as well as to upgrade communication capabilities.
ti Because the pipeline and utilities will be underground there will be no reduction in open
space acreage. Previous development activities on the site or other influences associated
with human habitation have previously impacted the biological significance of all of the
,r subject property through a reduction of plant and animal diversification.
Project implementation will not impose constraints which would narrow the range of
beneficial uses of the environment or pose long-term risks to public health and safety.
d 9.0 ANY SIGNIFICANT IRREVERSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL
CHANGES WHICH WOULD BE INVOLVED IN THE
PROPOSED ACTION SHOULD rT BE IMPLEMENTED
Development of the project area represents a long-term commitment of additional
—� infrastructure to an urbanized use. Since the project site was previously developed, no
significant impacts to vegetation, biota or natural drainage features within the site areas
are expected. Some local changes in topographic relief compatible with the proposed
SARW are proposed.
..i
59
Implementation of the proposed project, and its cumulative impacts will further y
involve the use of fossil fuel as well as water, sand and gravel, and other natural resources
which when once utilized represent either an irretrievable loss or depletion of those
resources and materials. br
10.0 AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS CONTACTED L
Regional Agencies
SCAG
Attn: Philip Fernando, Clearinghouse Official
818 West Seventh Street, 12th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017-3435
State Agencies
I
V
Department of Transportation
District 12 - Advance Planning Branch
Attn: Robert F. Joseph y
2501 Pullman Street
Santa Ana, CA 92705
South Coast Air Quality Management District L
Planning & Environmental Services
9150 Flair Drive
El Monte, CA 91731
State Clearinghouse r
Office of Planning and Research
1400 Tenth Street
Sacramento, CA 95814 r
State Water Resources Control Board
Attn: Allan Patton, Chief
Loans and Grants Administration
2014 T Street, Suite 130 (P.O. Box 944212)
Sacramento, CA 94244-2120 L,
County Agencies L
County of Orange - EMA
Attn: Kari A. Rigoni, Senior Planner
Regional Coordination Office
P.O. Box 4048
Santa Ana, CA 92702.4048
60
u
County of Orange
GSA - Real Estate Director
14 Civic Center Plaza, 3rd Floor
Post Office Box 4106
Santa Ana, CA 92702-4106
r_
Orange County Transit District
Attn: Kay Van Sickel, Manager of Planning
r 11222 Acacia Parkway
Garden Grove, CA 92642-3005
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Attn: Thomas Dawes, Director of Engineering
Jean Tappan, Administrative Secretary
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018
City Agencies
Costa Mesa
Community Development
77 Far Drive
P.O. Box 1200
Costa Mesa, CA 92628-1200
City of Huntington Beach
Community Development Department
Attn: Laura Phillips, Associate Planner
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
City of Tustin
Attn: Wisam Alto Waiji
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92680
City of Fountain Valley
Attn: Wayne Osborne, Director of Public Works
w 10200 Slater Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92703
City of Buena Park
Attn: Charles Fokiler
6650 Beach Boulevard
�+ Buena Park, CA 90620
r
61
r
L
California Department of Water Resources, 1984. "Water Conservation in California."
Bulletin 198-84. July.
61
California Regional Water Quality Control Board, 1994. Water Quality Control Plan,Santa
Ana River Basin (Region 8, Santa Ana Region). 1983 Amendment.
L
California State Water Resources Control Board, 1978. 'Tbe Clean Water Grants Program
and Jobs: An update:' September. j
Canter, LW., 1977. Environmental Impact Assessment. McGraw-Hill, Inc. L+
City of Huntington Beach, 1984. Coastal Element(Revised). Department of Development L
Services.
City of Huntington Beach, 1984. Huntington Beach General Plan(Local Coastal Program). J
Department of Development Services.
Clark S.C., et. al., 1976. "Disease Risks of Occupational Exposure to Sewage." Journal of L
the Environmental Engineering Division, Proceedings of the American Society of
Civil Engineers, ASCE. Vol. 102, No. EE2, p. 375-87.
Clark, C.S., et. al., 1981. Health Risks of Human Exposure to Wastewater. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency Research and Development Project Summary,
March. EPA-600/S1-81-002. L
Converse-Ward-Davis-Dixon Associates, 1979. "Geotechnical Investigation of Proposed
Solids Handling Facilities at CSDOC Plant No. 2." L
County of Orange, 1981. "Orange County Subregional Element for the 1982 Regional Air
Quality Management Plan." Environmental Management Agency and Orange County L
Subregional Planning Council, February.
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, 1972. Interim Flood Hazard Analysis,Report
and Environmental Impact Statement on Flood Retention Wall.
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, 1973. Flood Hazard Analysis, Report. L
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, 1985. Joint Treatment Works Wastewater
Master Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report. March. Prepared by IC. P. L
Lindstrom & Associates.
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, 1985. Joint Treatment Works Wastewater
Master Plan Final Environmental Impact Report,June. Prepared by K.P.Lindstrom L
& Associates.
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, 1987. 1986 Annual Report." Submitted to L
Regional Water Quality Control Board.
y
64
L
L�
County of Orange
GSA - Real Estate Director
14 Civic Center Plaza, 3rd Floor
Post Office Box 4106
Santa Ana, CA 927024106
Orange County Transit District
Attn: Kay Van Sickel, Manager of Planning
11222 Acacia Parkway
Garden Grove, CA 92642-3005
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Attn: Thomas Dawes, Director of Engineering
Jean Tappan, Administrative Secretary
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018
City Agencies
Costa Mesa
y Community Development
77 Fair Drive
P.O. Box 1200
Costa Mesa, CA 92628-1200
City of Huntington Beach
"` Community Development Department
Attn: Laura Phillips, Associate Planner
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
City of Tustin
.. Attn: Wisam Alto Waiji
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92680
ti
City of Fountain Valley
Attn: Wayne Osborne, Director of Public Works
.: 10200 Slater Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92703
City of Buena Park
Attn: Charles Fokiler
6650 Beach Boulevard
Buena Park, CA 90620
61
YI
California Department of Water Resources, 1984. "Water Conservation in California." ✓
Bulletin 198-84. July. f
California Regional Water Quality Control Board, 1994. Water Quality Control Plan, Santa
Ana River Basin (Region 8, Santa Ana Region). 1983 Amendment.
California State Water Resources Control Board, 1978. 'The Clean Water Grants Program
and Jobs: An update." September. 0
Canter, L.W., 1977. Environmental Impact Assessment. McGraw-Hill, Inc.
City of Huntington Beach, 1984. Coastal Element(Revised). Department of Development
Services.
City of Huntington Beach, 1984. Huntington Beach General Plan (Local Coastal Program).
Department of Development Services.
Clark, S.C., et. al., 1976. 'Disease Risks of Occupational Exposure to Sewage." Journal of ll
the Environmental Engineering Division, Proceedings of the American Society of
Civil Engineers, ASCE. Vol. 102, No. EE2, p. 375-87. W
Clark, C.S., et. al., 1981. Health Risks of Human Exposure to Wastewater. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency Research and Development Project Summary,
March. EPA-600/51-81-002.
Converse-Ward-Davis-Dixon Associates, 1979. "Geotechnical Investigation of Proposed
Solids Handling Facilities at CSDOC Plant No. 2." u
County of Orange, 1981. "Orange County Subregional Element for the 1982 Regional Air U
Quality Management Plan." Environmental Management Agency and Orange County
Subregional Planning Council, February.
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, 1972. Interim Flood Hazard Analysis,Report V
and Environmental Impact Statement on Flood Retention Wall.
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, 1973. Flood Hazard Analysis, Report .J
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, 1985. Joint Treatment Works Wastewater
Master Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report. March. Prepared by IC. P. 1J
Lindstrom & Associates.
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, 1985. Joint Treatment Works Wastewater 1J
Master Plan Final Environmental Impact Report,June. Prepared by K P.Lindstrom
& Associates.
V
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, 1987. "1986 Annual Report." Submitted to
Regional Water Quality Control Board. ' p
4
64 V
V
d
�= Orange County Water District
Attn: Nereus Richardson
Assistant Manager/District Engineer
.. 10500 Ellis Avenue (P.O. Box 8300)
Fountain Valley, CA 92728
Public
Phyllis S. Carruthers
22051 Capistrano Lane
Huntington Beach, CA 92646
11.0 REFERENCES
Archeological Research, Inc., 1975. Letter Report on Archeological Survey at CSDOC
v, Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2. Prepared for J.B. Gilbert & Associates as part of a
Supplemental EIR for Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 (State Clearinghouse No.
7411404).
Babson and Sheppard, 1990. Appraisal of Oil Lease Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2.
Boyle Engineering Corporation, 1986. Preliminary Submittal — Phase I -- Program &
Schematic Design for Central Laboratory. Prepared for County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, November.
Boyle Engineering Corporation, 1987. Site Improvements at Reclamation Plant No. 1
(P1-27) Entrances, Roads, Landscaping. March.
Brown and Caldwell, 1987. Central Power Generation Systems-County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, CSDOC Job J-19., February.
" California Department of Fish and Game, 1980. "At the Crossroads 1980 - A Report on
California's Endangered and Rare Fish and Wildlife."
California Department of Health Services, 1985. "Environmental Review for Waste
Discharge-Interim Treatment and Disposal Program, Stringfellow Hazardous Waste
Site."
California Department of Water Resources, 1978a. "Wind In California." Bulletin No. 185,
January, 267p.
California Department of Water Resources, 1978b. "California Sunshine - Solar
Radiation." Data Bulletin 187. August p. 110.
California Department of Water Resources, 1983. "Urban Water Use in California."
Bulletin 166-3. October.
63
L
California Department of Water Resources, 1984. "Water Conservation in California." �„✓
Bulletin 198-84. July.
N
California Regional Water Quality Control Board, 1984. Water Quality Control Plan,Santa
Ana River Basin (Region 8, Santa Ana Region). 1983 Amendment. t
L
California State Water Resources Control Board, 1978. 'The Clean Water Grants Program
and Jobs: An update." September.
Canter, LW., 1977. Environmental Impact Assessment. McGraw-Hill, Inc.
City of Huntington Beach, 1984. Coastal Element(Revised). Department of Development L
Services.
City of Huntington Beach, 1984. Huntington Beach General Plan(Local Coastal Program). ,
Department of Development Services.
Clark, S.C., et. al., 1976. 'Disease Risks of Occupational Exposure to Sewage." Journal of L;
the Environmental Engineering Division, Proceedings of the American Society of
Civil Engineers, ASCE. Vol. 102, No. EE2, p. 375-87.
La
Clark, C.S., et. al., 1981. Health Risks of Human Exposure to Wastewater. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency Research and Development Project Summary,
March. EPA-600/51-81-M.
Converse-Ward-Davis-Dixon Associates, 1979. "Geotechnical Investigation of Proposed
Solids Handling Facilities at CSDOC Plant No. 2." it
County of Orange, 1981. "Orange County Subregional Element for the 1982 Regional Air
Quality Management Plan." Environmental Management Agency and Orange County
Subregional Planning Council, February.
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, 1972. Interim Flood Hazard Analysis,Report �J
and Environmental Impact Statement on Flood Retention Wall.
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, 1973. Flood Hazard Analysis, Report.
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, 1985. Joint Treatment Works Wastewater
Master Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report. March. Prepared by IC. P.
Lindstrom & Associates.
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, 1985. Joint Treatment Works Wastewater
Master Plan Final Environmental Impact Report,June. Prepared by K.P.Lindstrom
& Associates.
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, 1987. "1986 Annual Report." Submitted to r
Regional Water Quality Control Board.
bw
64
V
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, 1984. "Focused Environmental Impact
Report for the Formation of Orange County Sanitation District No. 13 and Related
Fiscal Agreements." Prepared by Ultrasystems, Inc. June.
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, 1986. "1985 Annual Report," 3 volumes.
Dreiblatt,D., 1972. The Economics of Heavy Earthmoving. Praeger Publishers, New York.
Engineering Science, 1987a. Dispersion Modeling and Risk Assessment for Central Power
Cogeneration Units — Treatment Plant No. 1. Prepared for County Sanitation
Districts of Orange County, May.
b Engineering Science, 1987b. Dispersion Modeling and Risk Assessment for Central Power
Cogeneration Units — Treatment Plant No. 2. Prepared for County Sanitation
Districts of Orange County, May.
Feliciano, D.V., 1979. "Wastewater Aerosols and Health Risks." Journal Water Pollution
Control Federation, 51, p.2573.
John Carollo Engineers, 1983. "CSDOC Masterplan for Joint Works Wastewater Treatment
and Disposal Facilities" April.
Joint CAPCOA/ARD/EPA Committee, 1984. "Report on the Implementation of AB1862
Relating to the Siting of Cogeneration Projects." May.
Keith, R. W., 1977. "California South Coast Air Basin Hourly Wind Flow Patterns." South
Coast Air Quality Management District, January, p. 288.
Keith, R. W., 1980. "A Climatological/Air Quality Profile - South Coast Air Basin." South
Coast Air Quality Management District, November, p. 165.
Leedy, D.L., et. al., 1978. 'Planning for Wildlife in Cities and Suburbs." Prepared for U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service by Urban Wildlife Research Center, Inc., Ellicot City, MD.
FWS/OBS - '77-66. January.
Leroy Crandall and Associates, 1990. Draft Report of Foundation Investigation Proposed
Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor (Job No. I-9) Adjacent to Santa Ana River
Between Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2 Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach,
California, for the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County.
Malcolm Pirnie, 1984a. "Special Study Report - Odor Situation Assessment and Recom-
mended Plant - Plant No. L" November.
Malcolm Pirnie, 1984b. "Special Study Report - Odor Situation Assessment and Recom-
mended Plan - Plant No. 2." November.
Malcolm Pirnie, 1984c. "Special Study Report - Odor Situation Assessment and Recom-
mended Plan - Executive Summary for Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2." November.
65
u
Orange County Waste Management Advisory Commission, 1984. "Orange County Solid
Waste Management Plan." Final Report.
Pulaski and Arita, Architects, Incorporated, 1987. Master Plan of Support Facilities for
Plant Number 1. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. January.
Pulaski and Arita, Architects, Incorporated. 1987. Treatment Plant No. 2 Master Plan
Report. March.
Rou, J.C. and Wooten, D.C. (Editors), 1980. Environmental Impact Analysis Handbook, y
McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc..
Roberts, E.B. and Hagan, R.M., 1977. "Guidelines for the Estimation of Total Energy L
Requirements of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Alternatives." Water Science and
Engineering Section, Department of Land, Air, and Water Resources, University of
California, Davis. L
Southern California Association of Governments, 1984. "Reducing Infrastructure Needs and
Costs - Roadway, Water and Wastewater Systems, October. L
Southern California Association of Governments, 1990. Environmental Documentation and
Review General Requirements for Negative Declarations, Mitigated Negative
Declarations,Notices of Preparation, Environmental Impact Reports,Environmental
Assessments, and Related Documents.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1978. "Soil Survey of Orange County and Western Part of
Riverside County." Completed by Soil Conservation Service and Forest Service in
cooperation with the University of California Agriculture Experiment Station. L
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1976. "Direct Environmental Factors at Municipal
Wastewater Treatment Works Evaluation and Control of Site Aesthetic, Air L
Pollutants, Noise and Other Operation and Construction Factors." EPA430/9-7-
6-003, January, p. 104.
t
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1980. "Wastewater Aerosols and Disease." Health L
Effects Research Laboratory, EPA-600/9-80-028. December.
Water Pollution Control Federation, 1983. "Safety and Health in Wastewater Systems."
Manual of Practice No. 1.
LI
V
L
u
66
U
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 29 3, 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
ON
AUGUST 8, 1990
.o PitTATto
ryy 6 me^mn o,"q'S�
w' I
ORgA'GE C 1N`
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
' 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on August 8, 1990, at
7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance
and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 14 as follows:
ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO. 1: x James A. Wanner, Chairman Orma Crank
x Charles E. Puckett, Chairman pro tam _Richard B. Edgar
-7--Dan Griset Dan Young
xRoger Stanton _Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 2: a Iry Pickle,, Chairman _Fred Hunter
xJames Neal, Chairman pro tan George Scott
Roland E. Bigonger -7--Henry W. Wedaa
-W--A.B. "Buck" Catlin __Chris Norby
7—Dan Griset _Dan Young
x William D. Mahoney _Beth Graham
=Robert H. Main Norman Culver
a Carrey Nelson —Harman
Wedin
x Arthur G. Newton —Harold
Z. Eckenrode
z Wayne Silzel _Harold Saldarini
a Don E. Smith Fred Barrera
xRoger Stanton _Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 3: x Richard Polls, Chairman _Eva G. Miner
%J.R. "Bob" Slefen, Chairman pro tam _Dewey Wiles
=Edward L. Allen _David J. Shawver
x Margaret M. Arnold Cecilia L. Age
Wes Bannister =_Peter Green
7—A.B. "Buck" Catlin _Chris Norby
=Norman Culver _Robert H. Main
z Beth Graham _William D. Mahoney
x Don R. Griffin _Donna L. Chessen
=Dan Griset Dan Young_
=James Neal George Scott
a Carrey Nelson _Wayne Wedin
a Iry Pickier _Fred Hunter
x Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
x Charles Sylvia Robert Wahlstrom
Edna Wilson x Frank Laszlo
DISTRICT NO. 5: x Evelyn Hart, Chairman Ruthelyn Plummer
a Phil Sansone, Chairman pro tam —RogerJohn C. Cox, Jr.
x Don R. Roth _ Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 6: x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman Evelyn Hart
=James Wanner, Chairman pro tam —James M. Ferryman
=Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 7: a Don E. Smith, Chai roan Fred Barrera
=_Richard Edgar, Chairman pro tan —Charles E. Puckett
John C. Cox, Jr. =Ruthelyn Plummer
-7--Dan Griset Dan Young
=_Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
Sally Anne Sheridan x Barry Hammond
=James Wanner _Harry Green
DISTRICT NO. 11: x Grace Winchell, Chairman _Peter Green
x Tom Mays, Chairman pro tam Jim Silva
xRoger Stanton _Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 13: x Henry W. Wades, Chairman _Roland E. Bigonger
-7--Wayne Wedin, Chairman pro tam _Carrey Nelson
a Iry Pickier Fred Hunter
x Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
a Don E. Smith _Fred Barrera
DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chairman Darryl Miller
Sally Anne Sheridan, Chai man pro tam x Barry Hammond
\ftoo/ =Leslie A. Pontious —Richard B. Edgar
7—Don R. Roth —Roger Stanton
-7--Don E. Smith —Fred Barrera
.2_
08/08/90
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager,
Rita J. Brown, Board Secretary, Blake
P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary
G. Streed, Corinne Clawson, Ed Hodges,
Penny Kyle, Jahn Linder, Rory Nelson,
Charles Nichols, Bob Ooten, Jack
Vincent, Mark Esquer, Adriana Renescu
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel ,
Clark Ide, Jamel Demir, Walt Howard,
Bill Knopf, Kris Lindstrom, Phil
Stone, Mike Deblieux, Steve Coma, Mary
Lee
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
DISTRICT 13 This 8th day of August, 1990, at
Adjournment of meeting due to lack 7:30 p.m., being the time and place
of quorum for the Regular Meeting of the Board
of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 13 of Orange County, California, and there not being a quorum
present in District No. 13, the meeting of said District was thereupon
adjourned by the Secretary.
DISTRICTS 7 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file minute excerpt
from the City of Irvine re Board That the minute excerpt from the City
appointments of Irvine re election of mayor and
appointment of alternate Director and
seating a new member of the Board, be, and is hereby, received and ordered
filed, as follows: (*Mayor)
Districts Active Director Alternate Director
7 & 14 Sally Anne Sheridan* Barry Hammond
DISTRICTS 1,2 3 S 6 7 11 & 14 Vice Joint Chairman Mahoney reported
epar of ice o nt C a moan that Joint Chairman Catlin was still
recouperating from a recent accident
and doing well. He expects full recovery and will soon resume his full
calendar of civic responsibilities.
DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,11 8 14 The General Counsel reported on the
Report of the General Counsel status of litigation filed by
Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. and
Universal Circuits, Inc. concerning industrial waste discharge permits.
He advised that Universal Circuits, Inc. (UCI) had sold their printed
circuit board facility located within District No. 1 on South Yale Street in
the City of Santa Ana to United Pharmacy, Inc. An interim Industrial Waste
Discharge Permit was issed to the new owner on July 31, 1990. Accordingly,
UCI withdrew their appeal which had been scheduled to be heard by the
Executive Committee on August 1, 1990, thereby terminating the
administrative proceedings relative to the prior denial of the UCI permit
for the South Yale facility by the District's staff and General Manager.
-3-
08/08/90
The only issue remaining with regard to UCI is the District' s lawsuit
seeking to collect fines and penalties for the numerous violations of their
permit. The new owners of the facility have indicated that they will
endeavor to have all matters of legal dispute resolved prior to the close of
the sale of assets and the expiration of the District's interim permit,
which would be on or before October 1, 1990.
With regard to Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson (B/H-W) , whose facility is located
within District No. 3, Mr. Woodruff reported that there were two separate
lawsuits filed by B/H-W. One challenged conditions of their Industrial
Waste Permit and the other challenged the the District' s Industrial Waste
Ordinance; both Included challenges relative to the District' s compliance
with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements. The General
Counsel indicated that he was pleased to report that Judge William
Rylaarsdam in the Orange County Superior Court on August 6, 1990, ruled
favorably to the District in all respects and granted the District' s motion
for summary judgment in both lawsuits. Subject to appeal , the cases are
closed.
The Vice Joint Chairman then expressed the Boards' appreciation to the
General Counsel for his successful defense of the District in the above
matter. Mr. Woodruff credited Rutan & Tucker, and especially Mr. Dave
Larson, who joined with Rourke & Woodruff on this case, with being
responsible for a large part of the effort and success.
DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held July 11, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or
Approval Of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held July 11, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held July 11, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held July 11, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held July 11, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held July 11, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
-q-
V.r�
08/08/90
DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or
Approya of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held July 11, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held July 11, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICTS 1 2 5 3 6 7 11 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratification of a ent of Join
and TndiVIdual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual
District claims set forth on pages
"A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized
below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts
so indicated.
7/04/90 7/18/90
ALL DISTRICTS
Joating Fund - $ 894,769.45 $ 729,738.03
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 69710,901.54 368,265.20
Joint Working Capital Fund - 206,970.22 191,899.56
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 104,900.52 17,122.96
DISTRICT NO. 1 - -0- 1,076,251.41
DIDI TRI_ - 177,357.30 1,941,447.35
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 323,737.66 2,106,158.02
DISTR— I� - 29,155.30 8,746.68
DISTRT NO. 6 - -0- 525.75
DIST I� C N. / - 1909799.64 53,411.59
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 78.84 1,573.51
DISTR� - 206,332.91 3,872.46
DISTRITTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 3,580.49 5,537.99
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,353.14 -0-
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 3,348.35 -0-
,854,285.36 ,5 4,55 .51
DISTRICTS 1,2 3 5 6 7,11 & 14
Actions re Purchase of For y 40
Four-Wheel Electric Personnel
Carriers, Specification No. A-148.
and Purchase of Thirteen 13 Four-
Wheel Electric argo Carriers,
Specification No. A-149
Cancelling purchase of remaining Moved, seconded and duly carried:
balance of 29 four-wheel electric
p sonnel carriers awarded to That purchase of the remaining
Ki or Manufacturin Cam an re balance of 29four-wheel electric
ecifi ca on No. A-148 due to personnel carriers provided for
breach of con ract and non- in the purchase contract
performance by vendor authorized by the Boards' action
of December 13, 1989, which
which awarded purchase Specification No. A-148 to Karrior Manufacturing
Company, be, and is hereby, cancelled, in the net remaining amount of
$107,271.00 plus sales tax, based on breach of contract and
non-performance by the vendor.
-5-
08/08/90
Authorizing the General Counsel to Moved, seconded and duly carried:
institute legal proceedings against
Fleet E ui ment Cor oration That the General Counsel be, and
formerly Karrior Manufacturing is hereby, authorized and
Company to recover payment and directed to institute legal
�- damages for eleven four-wheel proceedings against Fleet
personnel carriers Equipment Corporation (formerly
Karrior Manufacturing Company) ,
if determined upon further investigation to be appropriate, to recover
payment and damages for eleven (11) four-wheel personnel carriers
delivered and paid for pursuant to Specification No. A-148 and
subsequently determined to be of poor workmanship and unsafe to
operate.
Cancelling purchase contract re Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Purchase Specification No. A-149
awarded to Karrior Manufacturing That the purchase contract
Company due to breach of contract authorized by the Boards' action
and non-performance by vendor of December 13, 1989, awarding
Purchase Specification No. A-149
to Karrior Manufacturing Company, in the total amount of $55,411.20
plus sales tax, be, and is hereby, cancelled, based on breach of
contract and non-performance by the vendor.
Awarding balance of purchase Moved, seconded and duly carried:
contract for Specification
No. A-148 to Ta for-Ounn That the balance of purchase
Manufacturing Jompany contract for Specification
No. A-148, be, and is hereby,
awarded to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company, as a substitute vendor
for the original defaulting vendor for the completion of the contract
on the same terms and conditions, to wit: delivery of 29 personnel
carriers at the same unit price, for the total amount of $107,271.00
plus sales tax.
Awarding purchase contract for Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Specification No. A-149 t0 Taylor-
Ounn Manufacturing Company That the purchase contract for
Specification No. A-149, be, and
Is hereby, awarded to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company, as a
substitute vendor for the original defaulting vendor for the
performance of the entire contract on the same terms and conditions, to
wit: delivery of 13 cargo carriers at the same unit price, for the
total amount of $55,411.20 plus sales tax.
DISTRICTS 1,2,3,516.7,11 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awarding Specification No. P-120 to
Callaway Chemical Company, Division That the Boards of Directors hereby
of Exxon Chemical Company adopt Resolution No. 90-97, receiving
and filing bid tabulation and
recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Anionic Polyelectrolyte
Chemical Polymer, Specification No. P-120, to Callaway Chemical Company,
Division of Exxon Chemical Company, for the price of $.865 per wet pound,
plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning September 1, 1990, with
provision for four one-year extensions upon mutually-agreeable terms
(estimated annual cost $181,027.20 plus sales tax). Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
... -6-
08/08/90
DISTRICTS 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 8 14
c ons re Purchase o aus c oda
Solution, Specification No. P-121 and file letter from Moved, seconded and duly carried:
HoltraChem es Inc. withdrawing �...✓
e r bid for bpeclTlcation That the letter from HoltraChem
NO. P-IZI West, Inc-. dated July 16, 1990,
the apparent low bidder,
requesting that they be allowed to withdraw their bid for said material
due to a mathematical error, be, and is hereby, received and ordered
filed.
Approving request of HoltraChem Moved, seconded and duly carried:
West, Inc.
That the request of HoltraChem
West, Inc. for withdrawal of their bid, be, and is hereby, approved.
Award in S ecification No. P-121 to Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Wes ern ates Chemical upply
Corporation That the Boards of Directors
hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-98,
receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding
contract for Purchase of Caustic Soda Solution, Specification
No. P-121, to Western States Chemical Supply Corporation, for the price
of $348.49 per dry ton, plus freight and sales tax, for a one-year
period beginning September 1, 1990, with provision for a one-year
extension, with estimated costs to be shared as follows:
Treatment Trunk
Plants Sewers Total
Joint Districts $523,273.50 $436,061.25 $ 959,334.75
District 3 Only 436,061.25 436,061.25
$523,273.50 $872,122.50 $1,395,396.00
Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
DISTRICTS 1 2,3 5,6,7 11 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Chang Order No. to the
fans and specifications for That Change Order No. 2 to the plans
Job No. J-17 and specifications for Central
Laboratory, Job No. J-17, authorizing _
a net addition of $57,876.31 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation
for six items of additional work or deletions, be, and is hereby, approved.
DISTRICTS 1,2 3,5 6 7 11 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
A rov n Cane rder 910
o. 6 to
e
Tans and sec cations for That Change Order No. 6 to the plans
Job No. J-ZU and specifications for Warehouse and
Maintenance Building and Oil Storage
and Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20, authorizing an addition of
$30,840.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for eight items of
additional work, and granting a time extension of eight calendar days for
completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
-7-
08/08/90
DISTRICTS 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
A rov n Change r er 0. 0 he
lans and s ecif ca ions for That Change Order No. 2 to the plans
Job No. Pl-34-1 and specifications for Gas Handling
Facilities at Reclamation Plant
No. 1, Job No. P1-34-1, authorizing a net addition of $35,609.00 to the
contract with Zlebarth & Alper for six items of additional work or
deletions, be, and is hereby, approved.
DISTRICTS 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
[ce t n Job o. 1- - as
comp ate That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 90-99, accepting
Rehabilitation of Digesters 7 and 8 at Plant No. 1, Job No. PI-35-1, as
complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving
Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby
made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICTS 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
A rov n A en um o. o the
Profess ono ervices A reemen That the Boards of Directors hereby
with Ma corm P rnie Inc. far adopt Resolution No. 90-100,
desi n and cons ruction services approving Addendum No. 4 to the
re Job NDe. P1- 5 PS- P -32 Professional Services Agreement with
and Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. for design and
construction services required for
Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-25; Foul Air Scrubber
System at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-26; Covers for Primary Basins at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 2, Jab
No. P2-33; and Improvements to Grit Facility "B", Billings Tunnel and
Distribution Structure "A", Job No. P2-34, providing for a reallocation of
the costs among categories within said agreement, with no change in the
maximum authorized compensation of $892,708.00. Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICTS 1 2 3 5 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
rovin Aden um6 o.7 li to the
P rofessional Services Areement That the Selection Committee
with Lee an o onsul in certification of the final negotiated
Engineers for design and fee relative to Addendum No. 3 to the
construction services re Professional Services Agreement with
Job No. Pl-33 Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers for
design and construction services
required for Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at
Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33, providing for additional
construction support services, preparation of an amendment to the Operations
and Maintenance Manual , and start-up and training services, and reducing
subconsultant fees previously authorized, be, and is hereby, received,
ordered filed and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution
No. 90-101, approving Addendum No. 3 to said Agreement with Lee and RD
Consulting Engineers for said additional services and reduction in
subconsultant fees, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus
direct expenses, for an additional amount not to exceed $123,400.00,
increasing the total authorized compensation from $1,064,500.00 to an amount
not to exceed $1,187,900.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is
hereby made a part of these minutes.
-B-
08/08/90
DISTRICTS 1 2,3 5 6 7 11 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizin the election Committee
to ne o iate a Professional That the Selection Committee be, and
ervices Agreement for engineering is hereby, authorized to solicit
and environmental services for proposals and negotiate a
preparation of a Protect Report Professional Services Agreement for
Su lament No. to the Pra ram engineering and environmental
Environmental impact Re art on t e services for preparation of a Project
Collection, Treatment and Disposal Report, Supplement No. 2 to the
Facilities Master Plan and for Program Environmental Impact Report
design an construction support on the Collection, Treatment and
services re Jo No. P1-37 Disposal Facilities Master Plan, and
for design and construction support
services relative to Primary Clarifiers 16-27 and Related Facilities at
Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-37.
DISTRICTS 1 2,3 5 6 7 11 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the eneral anager to
em to a Financial manager at the That the General Manager be, and is
op step of the salary range to hereby, authorized to employ a
work in the Finance Division Financial Manager at the top step of
the salary range (currently $5,669.00
per month) for this position classification to work in the Districts'
Finance Division.
• DISTRICTS 1 2 3 5,6 7 11 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing t e eneral anager o
employ a Laboratory Manager at the That the General Manager be, and is
to step of the solar ran a to hereby, authorized to employ a
work in the Technical ervices Laboratory Manager at the top step of _
Laboratory Division the salary range (currently $5,592.00
per month) for this position
classification to work in the Districts' Technical Services/Laboratory
Division.
DISTRICTS 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Establ shing 191112
9 - 1 charges for
Class I, Class II and Class III That the respective Boards of
Industria Waste iennittees Directors hereby adopt the following
resolutions establishing 1990-91
charges for Class I, Class II and Class III permittees, pursuant to
provisions of the uniform Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of
District Sewerage Facilities of said Districts:
1990-91 INDUSTRIAL USER RATES `
Class I & II Fee Class III Fee _
Dist. No. Resolution No. Flaw * S.S. * B.O.D. * Flow
1 90-102-1 $186.80 $154.58 $120.98 $ 761.33
2 90-103-2 182.59 154.58 120.98 757.12
3 90-104-3 214.53 154.58 120.98 789.06
5 90-105-5 230.18 154.58 120.98 804.71
6 90-106-6 191.81 154.58 120.98 766.34
7 90-107-7 247.23 154.58 120.98 821.77
11 90-108-11 252.94 154.58 120.98 827.47
14 90-110-14 344.75 154.58 120.98 919.28
*F,low - Per million gallons of flow
*S.S. - Per thousand pounds of suspended solids
*B.O.D. - Per thousand pounds of biochemical oxygen demand
-9-
08/08/90
DISTRICTS 1 2 3,5 7,11 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive ile and approve written
report of the Conservation, That the written report of the
Reclamation and Reuse Committee conservation, Reclamation and Reuse
Committee meeting held on July 26,
1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,11 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and a rove written
report of the Building omnittee That the written report of the
Building Committee meeting held on
July 31, 1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,11 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 18 to
the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 18 to the
Job No. J-7-4 plans and specifications for
Administration Building Addition,
Job No. J-7-4, authorizing an addition of $240,000.00 to the contract with
J. R. Roberts Corp. to provide Interim funding for Phases 2, 3 and 4
additional framing and concrete, heating and air conditioning, electrical ,
fire protection, plumbing, painting, plaster and stucco, insulation, and
sheet metal and roof work, as recommended by the Building Committee, be, and
is hereby, approved.
DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,11 8 14 The Vice Joint Chairman noted that the
Receive, file and approve written Boards' approval of the Executive
report of the Executive Committee Committee's written report of the
meeting on July 25, 1990, would
constitute approval of the salary adjustments considered and recommended by
the Committee at said meeting. He further advised that a formal resolution
for the recommended adjustments would be considered by the Boards at their
next regular meeting on September 12th.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the written report of the Executive Committee meeting held on July 25,
1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,11 8 14
Actions re selection of underwriter
and bond counsel for Districts
long-range financinq and borrowing
program
Appointing Merrill Lynch Capital It was moved and seconded:
Markets as the Senior Manager
Underwriter for the Districts' That the Boards of Directors
long-term securities debt issue adopt Resolution No. 90-111,
program designating and appointing
Merrill Lynch Capital Markets as
the Senior Manager/Underwriter writer for the Districts' proposed
long-term securities debt issue program, as recommended by the Fiscal
Policy and Executive Committees.
-10-
uoiuotyu
Supervisor Stanton stated that he opposed this motion for the reasons
he stated at the Executive Committee meeting. He noted that his staff
had advised him that the usual practice of the County of Orange, other
counties and the State is to use co-managers for their debt issues, and
he believed the Districts should retain co-managers in connection with
their program. Supervisor Roth concurred and quoted statistics
indicating that the majority of governmental issues in recent years
have utilized co-managers.
The General Counsel pointed out that the Districts did not request
proposals for co-manager underwriting services, but didn't believe
there would be any additional costs nor savings by using co-managers.
Directors discussed the dollar amounts of the debt proposed to be
issued over the next 15 years. It was noted that the entire amount may
total over $600 million in numerous issues over the next several years,
but the first issue would be considerably less, perhaps around
$100 million. Director Swan commented that $100 million was not
considered a large issue requiring a co-manager. If the issue is _
larger than that, the Districts could then evaluate whether additional
managers should be retained. It was pointed out that increasing the
size of an issue increases the likelihood of utilizing co-managers.
Certain types of issues, such as variable rate, do not lend themselves
to co-managers. The Districts' preliminary plan includes a mix of
fixed and variable rate issues. It was also pointed out that it was
important on the first issue to have a single manager to develop a
financial structure and marketing strategy and not have to deal with
competing or Contradictory interests that sometimes occur with
co-managers. The Boards can change managers or utilize co-managers at
any time and the proposed resolution so provides.
Directors pointed out that the Fiscal Policy Committee and the
Executive Committee have spent a considerable amount of time studying �..�
this matter since February. The Committees' recommendation is that the
program start with one Senior Manager to develop a financial structure
and marketing strategy, which will require a very close working
relationship with the Districts' staff.
In reponse to Directors' comments relative to the possible benefit of
additional oversight by a co-manager, it was pointed out that the new
Districts' staff position of Financial Manager was intended to provide
In-house expertise and oversee the activities of the underwriter.
Directors also discussed continuing the matter until the next Board
meeting in order for the full Board to review all of the issues
considered by the Fiscal Policy Committee and the Executive Committee.
However, staff pointed out that the Committees' recommended schedule
provided for the first debt securities to be issued in the
October/November time frame in order to meet the funding requirements
for the construction program included in the 1989 Master Plan approved
by the Boards last July. The General Manager noted that if the
selection of a Senior Manager is delayed, it would be very difficult to
meet that time schedule.
-11-
08/08/90
Director Silzel explained that the principal reason for appointing a
single Senior Manager at this point was to have one key person in
charge to develop a marketing strategy that will ensure that the
Districts are utilizing the lowest cost method of raising funds, rather
than have competing proposals and possible conflicts between two
co-managers. He observed that this was particularly important because
of a potentially unsettled market due to the Middle-East situation. He
added that if the Board desires to replace or add another Manager in
the future, it would still be possible to do that. He concurred with
the Committees' recommendation and pointed out that the Senior Manager
would lay the plan and could pull in other underwriters to help with
the sale. Mr. Silzel said he not object to co-managers but felt it was
important to move forward at this time.
Following further discussion and a call for the question, the Boards of
Directors adopted Resolution No. 90-111, designating and appointing
Merrill Lynch Capital Markets as the Senior Manager/Underwriter for the
Districts' proposed long-tern securities debt issue program. Directors
Norman E. Culver, Robert H. Main, Don R. Roth and Roger R. Stanton
requested that their votes in opposition to the motion be made a matter
of record. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part
of these minutes.
Approving Professional Services Moved, seconded and duly carried:
A reement with the law firms of
ud a Rose uthrie Alexander & That the Boards of Directors
er on anO Rourke a Woodruff to hereby adopt Resolution
serve as co-Bond Counsel for No. 90-112, approving a
proposed long-term securities debt Professional Services Agreement
issue program with the law firms of Mudge Rose
Guthrie Alexander & Ferdon and
Rourke & Woodruff to serve as co-Bond Counsel for the Districts'
proposed long-term securities debt issue program. Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,11 & 14
Actions relative t0 the purchase of
surface easements and subur-sface
oil and mineral rights at Treatment
Plant No.
Authorizin the General Manager and Moved, seconded and duly carried:
General ounsel to offer to
urchase oil facilities leases and That the General Manager and
mineral rights at appraisal prices General Counsel be, and are
hereby, authorized to offer to
purchase oil facilities, leases and mineral rights at the appraisal
prices from the following:
(1) D. W. Elliott
(2) County of Orange
(3) Pacific Energy Resources
(Karalas Lease)
(4) Lessor Group
(5) Overriding Royalty Owners
-12-
08/08/90
Authort zin the General Counsel to Moved, seconded and duly carried:
ins tit eminent domain
ceedIn s against operators or That the General Counsel be, and
seho der ss is hereby, authorized to
institute eminent domain
proceedings against operators or leaseholders, if necessary.
Authorizin staff to sol7cit Moved, seconded and duly carried:
ro osals for re drat on o lans
an s ecifica ons fora an on R That staff be, and is hereby,
and removal of oil facilities at authorized to solicit proposals
Treatment Plant No. 2 for the preparation of plans and
specifications for abandonment
and removal of the oil facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2.
DISTRICTS Id
3 5 6 7 11
Actions relat ve t, re ua8 P14
ca on
of suppliers and/or prepurchase of
certain major Items of eqU Amen
Approving prequalification of Moved, seconded and duly carried:
su liers of influent s and
variable re uenc or ves re uired That prequalification of the
In connection with JOD NO. P -4 -1 following suppliers of influent
pumps and variable frequency
drives required in connection with Electrification of Pump Drives at
Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-1, be, and is hereby, approved:
Influent Pumps:
(1) Fairbanks-Morse
(2) Allis Chalmers
(3) Patterson
(4) Gould
Variable Frequency Drives:
(1) Westinghouse
(2) Brown Boveri
(3) Ross Hill
(4) Toshiba
(5) Allen-Bradley
(6) General Electric
(7) Louis Allis
Authorizin staff to ne otiate with Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Parkson Corporation for so a source
urchase of W ss aeration diffusers That staff be, and is hereby,
for use n Job No. Fl_jb authorized to negotiate with
Parkson Corporation for the sole
source purchase of Wyss aeration diffusers for use in Secondary
Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36.
Author izin staff to negotiate with Moved, seconded and duly carried:
e Bud Company or sole source
purchase of sludge collectors for That staff be, and is hereby,
use in Jot)No. 2'1�-4Z-Z authorized to negotiate with The
Budd Company for the sole source
purchase of sludge collectors for use in Secondary Treatment Expansion
at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2.
-13-
08/08/90
Approving p re,ualltication of Moved, seconded and duly carried:
supp iers of computers and
associated equipment that will That prequalification of the
Interface with Districts' existing following suppliers of computers
equipment requ're
tl in connection and associated equipment that
with Job Nos. J-23-2 and P2-44 will interface with the
Districts' existing equipment
required in connection with Plant 1 Control Center Instrumentation, Job
No. J-23-2, and Replacement of Computerized Monitoring System at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-44, be, and is hereby, approved:
(1) Bailey Controls
(2) Allen-Bradley
(3) Fischer 8 Porter
(4) Johnson Yokogawa Corp.
(5) Westinghouse
DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,1I 8 14
Actions re preparation of
Supplement No. 1 to the Program
Environmental impact Report for the
19 Collection, Treatment and
Disposal Facilities Master Plan
required to assess impacts
resultin, from construction of
Job No. I-
Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering
reported that in 1989 the Boards
approved an updated Master Plan which provided for facilities necessary
to meet flow and regulatory discharge requirements for the next 30
years. Also approved was an Environmental Impact Report which
addressed most of the master-planned projects. However, a few
projectes included within the document were only able to be addressed
in a general manner and were designated as needing further review and
additional CEQA documentation when the project was ready to begin the
design phase. He noted that Job No. I-9, Interplant Pipeline and
Utility Corridor, was one of those projects.
In February the Directors approved an agreement with John Carollo
Engineers to provide environmental services, preliminary and final
design and construction support services for Job No. I-9. Mr. Dawes
reported that the project includes a new 120-inch diameter sewer line
to transport treated wastewater within a 30-foot corridor along the
westerly levee of the Santa Ana River from the Fountain Valley
Reclamation Plant to the Ocean Outfall Booster Station at Treatment
Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach. The new line will be approximately
18,700 feet long and will replace an old 42-inch line which is over 60
years old and in poor condition. Relocation and/or replacement of the
existing interplant digester gas line and communications cables will
also be required during construction of the new 120-inch line. The
estimated cost of this project is $32 million.
`� 14
08/08/90
Mr. Dawes noted that within the existing corridor are power poles which
belong to Southern California Edison Company which will have to be
relocated pursuant to the Districts' easement agreement of 1977. At
Plant No. 2 there are several oil leases which have operating wells
which interfere with the construction of the pipelines and they must be
purchased, removed and abandoned. Also, the Corps of Engineers, in
conjunction with the County of Orange, has scheduled Santa Ana River
channel improvements which could conflict with the construction of this
project. These possible impacts and scheduling contraints must be
addressed in the proposed EIR supplement.
Mr. Dawes further reported that staff has initiated the required
additional CEQA documentation for this project by circulating the
Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment which finds that an
Environmental Impact Report is required. He noted that the action on
the agenda authorizes preparation of a Draft Supplement No. 1 to the
Program EIR for the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities
Master Plan, and circulation of said document for public review in
compliance with CEQA.
Receive and file Initial Study and Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Environmental Impact Assessment re
Job No. I-9 That the Initial Study and
Environmental Impact Assessment
relative to construction of the InterplaAt Pipeline and Utility
Corridor, Job No. I-9, finding that said project could have a
significant effect on the environment and, therefore, an Environmental
Impact Report will be required, be, and are hereby, received and
ordered filed,
Authorizing preparation of Draft Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Supplement No. 1 to the Program EIR
for the 1989 Collection, Treatment That the Boards of Directors
and Disposal Facilities Master Plan hereby authorize preparation of
Draft Supplement No. 1 to the
Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1989 Collection, Treatment
and Disposal Facilities Master Plan and circulation for public review
in compliance with CEQA requirements.
DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,11 8 14
Actions re Supplemental Agenda
items relative to Summons and
Complaints filed on behalf of
District employees received
subsequent to the agenda being
posted
Report of General Counsel The General Counsel reported on
five Summons and Complaints
received subsequent to the agenda mailing which had been placed on a
supplemental agenda included in the Directors' meeting folders. He
advised that in his view these claims from District employees alleging
injuries as a result of exposure to chemicals in the performance of
their work are ill placed and notwell founded. Each of these
complaints are also subject to several procedural challenges due to
errors and untimeliness. Mr. Woodruff stated that these claims rest
solely as Workers' Compensation claims if any injury is to be
established at all . He further noted that the Plantiffs' counsel had,
in fact, filed Workers' Compensation claims, and they are currently
pending and set for hearing in the immediate future.
-15-
08/08/90
Receive and file General Counsel 's Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Memorandum
That the General Counsel 's
Memorandum dated August 6, 1990, be, and is hereby, received and
ordered filed.
Receive and file Summons and Moved, seconded and duly carried:
omDlaint for Damages for
Neg Bence-P remIle
s Liabi 1ty; That the Summons and Complaint
Ne 11 once-Produc s Ltab for Damages for
Breach of arrant trict Negligence-Premises Liability;
Liability; Fraudulent concealment, Negligence-Products Liability;
Manuel iverame o vs. County Breach of Warranty; Strict
3FRTIFations ricts of Orange Liability; Fraudulent
Founty range ounty Sup—e ri ar oncealment, Manuel Riveramelo
Court ase o. 5 4614 vs. County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, Orange County
Superior Court Case No. 564614, relative to alleged injuries to a
District employee as a result of exposure to chemicals in the
performance of his work, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed;
and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby,
authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts.
Receive and file Summons and Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Complaint for Damages for
Ne li ence-P rem ses Li abilit That the Summons and Complaint
Ne i ence-Products L ab tY for Damages for
Breach of warranty; Witt Negligence-Premises Liability;
Liability; Fraudulent oncea ment Negligence-Products Liability;
Robert Saucedo vs. county Breach of Warranty; Strict
San tation Districts of Orange Liability; Fraudulent
County, Orange Count Superior Concealment, Robert Saucedo vs.
Court Case NO. Mg
1 County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County, Orange County
Superior Court Case No. 564616, relative to alleged injuries to a
District employee as a result of exposure to chemicals in the
performance of his work, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed;
and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby,
authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts.
Receive and file Summons and Moved, seconded and duly-carried:
Compia nt for Damages for
Negligence-Premises Liability; That the Summons and Complaint
Negligence-Products Liability; for Damages for
reach o Warrant trict Negligence-Premises Liability;
Liability; raudu en oncealment, Negligence-Products Liability;
Jeffrey Lynn Jones vs. county Breach of Warranty; Strict
Sanitation Districts o ran a Liability; Fraudulent
County, Orange County Super or Concealment, Jeffrey Lynn Jones
Court Lase No. 564617 vs. County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, Orange County
Superior Court Case No. 564617, relative to alleged injuries to a
District employee as a result of exposure to chemicals in the
performance of his work, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed;
and,
�...� FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby,
authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts.
-I6-
08/08/90
Receive and file Summons and Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Como ain or ama es for
Ne 1 ence- remises L abiltt • That the Summons and Complaint
Ne li ence- MEN s a it t for Damages for _
reac q
of Warrant • trict Negligence-Premises Liability;
is it y; Frau ulent oncealmen , Negligence-Products Liability;
Frank Walton Jr. A Minor, by his Breach of Warranty; Strict
uardian ad Litem, Michelle Walton; Liability; Fraudulent
Jennifer Walton A Minor b her Concealment, Frank Walton, Jr. , A
uardian ad Litem, orie ;11er vs. Minor, by his Guardian ad Litem,
county banitation Districts Of Michelle Walton; Jennifer Walton,
Orange County, Orange County
A Minor, by her Guardian ad
uperior court case No. b19476 Litem, Lorie Miller vs. County
Sanitation Districts of Orange
County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 619476, relative to
alleged injuries to a District employee as a result of exposure to
chemicals 1n the performance of his work, be, and is hereby, received
and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby,
authorized to appear and defend the Interests of the Districts.
Receive and file Summons and Moved, seconded and duly carried:
omla nt far ama as or
e ence-Prem ses Liabilit • That the Summons and Complaint
Ne li ence-Produc s Liabilit • for Damages for
Breach of Warran trict Negligence-Premises Liability;
Llabil • Fraudulen oncea men Negligence-Products Liability;
nn Redman vs. ount anitat on Breach of Warranty; Strict
D1s ricts of Orange County, Orange Liability; Fraudulent
Count u en or curt Case Concealment, Lynn Redman vs.
0. 92 County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County, Orange County
Superior Court Case No. 622192, relative t0 alleged injuries to a
District employee as a result of exposure to chemicals In the
performance of his work, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed;
and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby,
authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
A journment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:20 p.m., August 8, 1990.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the election ommittee
to ne otlate a Professional That the Selection Committee be, and
e51cis A reement for re oration is hereby, authorized to solicit
o a Project Report relative to proposals and negotiate a
Contract No. 2-9-RI Professional Services Agreement for
preparation of a Project Report for
Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1.
-17-
08/08/90
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the Selection Committee
to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the That the Selection Committee be, and
Professional Services Agreement is hereby, authorized to negotiate
With Willdan Associates for design Addendum No. 2 t0 the Professional
�d and construction services required Services Agreement with Willdan
re Contract Nos. 2-2;-3 and 2-26 Associates for design and
construction services required for
Portion of Euclid Interceptor, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue,
Contract No. 2-26-3, and Katella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and
Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-28, to provide for additional design services
necessary to incorporate changes recommended by CALTRANS and the Cities of
Anaheim and Fullerton, and for other miscellaneous services required re
Contract No. 2-26-3.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing initiation of
proceedings re proposed Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby
No. 72 - Trider Annexation adopts Resolution No. 90-113-2,
authorizing initiation of proceedings
to annex 6.687 acres of territory to the District located in the vicinity of
Sycamore Street and Santiago Boulevard in the City of Villa Park (proposed
Annexation No. 72 - Trider Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2).
Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:20 p.m. , August 8, 1990.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:20 p.m. , August 8, 1990.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 2 to the
plans antl specifications re That Change Order No. 2 to the plans
Contract No. 5-34-2 and specifications for Improvements
to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer,
Phase 2, Contract No. 5-34-2, authorizing an addition Of $28,803.00 t0 the
contract with Kenko, Inc., dba McGrand 8 Associates, for two items of
additional work, and granting a time extension of six calendar days for
completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:20 p.m. , August 8, 1990.
-18-
O8/08/90
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
A rovin regiment between county
anitation District No. 6 Costa That the Board of Directors hereby
as
an tar Distr c and the 32n adopts Resolution No. 90-114-6,
r cu ural District for ransfer approving Agreement between County
of sewers within Orange uounty Sanitation District No. 6, Costa Mesa
a rgrounds Sanitary District and the 32nd
Agricultural District, providing for
the transfer of ownership and/or abandonment of sewers and easements within
and adjacent to the Orange County Fairgrounds from District No. 6 to the
Costa Mesa Sanitary District and the 32nd Agricultural District. Said
resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:20 p.m. , August 8, 1990.
DISTRICTS 7 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change rder o. to he
plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 2 to the plans
on ract No. 14-1-1B and specifications for Baker-Gisler
Interceptor, from Bristol Street to
Fairview Road (and City of Costa Mesa street improvements) , Contract
No. 14-1-1B, authorizing an addition of $94,697.00 to the contract with
Steve Bubalo Construction Co. for ten items of additional work, be, and is
hereby, approved.
DISTRICTS 7 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive file and deny claim of - -
Kathleen P. Landers re Contract That the claim of Kathleen P. Landers
No. 14-1-IB dated June 24, 1990, in the amount of
$650.50 for alleged damages to her
vehicle incurred in connection with construction of Baker-Gisler
Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road (and City of Costa Mesa
street improvements), Contract No. 14-1-18, be, and is hereby, received,
ordered filed and denied; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the
Districts' General Counsel , liability claims administrator, contractor and
contractor's insurance company for appropriate action.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change order No. Z to the
Uns and s ecifications re That Change Order No. 2 to the plans
ract Nas. 7-11-1 and 7-11-3 and specifications for Abandonment of
Lane Road Pump Station, Contract
No. 7-11-1. and Abandonment of Castlerock and Dow Avenue Pump Stations and
Modifications to MacArthur Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-3, authorizing an
addition of $24,319.00 to the contract with Colich & Sons (JV) for four
items of additional work, and granting a time extension of seven calendar
days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ad Turnment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman ^
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:20 p.m. , August 8, 1990.
-19-
08/08/90
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ad ournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:20 p.m., August 8, 1990.
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:20 p.m., August 8, 1990.
Secretary of t e Boards of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14
`r
-20-
FUk_. S1" .IT ']IST YOFMIIIG Cf1ITAL FROCF-SSINIi 04Fi 6/27/91 VAF•F
-� REPORT MAPPER AF4T
COUNTY SANTTWOM DISTRICIS OF ORANGE COUNTY . . _._ ....__._ ._.....
CLAIMS 1PIC !'T/:9/'•9 POSTING lPII' rT/t'9/91
1 .
WARRANT NO AMOUNT DESCRlP710N _. . .._._.
'1 • 107815 AYYA/NPCF RF'SIPUALS MGMT. S245. .L REGISTRATION
• 107816 - ACTION DOOR REFAIP CO _..,-_. f) 17,9_.J'1_ DOOR.RRFA3R.___.. .. .. _.__ ... .__._R ._._ _._ _. . ... . _ _ _-
107817 AIR COL CONSTRUCTORS• INf.. l462$322.85 ELECTRIC
PI-34-2
. '� • 1078I8 AIR COLD SUPPLY INC. S3I2.85 ELLCTRIC PARTS
• 107819 AiRGDeRn T,yp@STR IE4:-LNfiE... 9LR51'RIc 5U_eeLLRs _ . ._ _. .._.. _ .......-_
187820 ALL INDUSTRIAL VALVIS $2,629.41 VALVE
'7 T. 197822 ALPHAGA7 f2.219.1:4 PROPANE
' 107822 ALLIED SUPPLY CO. __..._._YSt109..0'A-. ._ _.. _ . __. __ .YALV@ ...__..._ ._ _-___
10782AT OF ANANE IM $117.9U. CONSTRUCTION RDIMB111188N'f 2-26. N.0:12-10-86
' "1'• 107824 AN ANANE 7N SEWER CONSTRUCTION $5r 135.64b9 BBYBR REPAIRS DIET 7
•. 107825 ANIR fE@_-�qp� A_Cd@LE _.. ___.32.115.3._.. _.. _ _.._.__. SABLE._
•e 10782 ANTELOPE VALLEY EQUIP. ,11 . 0 NOT PART
307827 A•PLUS SYSTEMS f9115.50 NOTICES 6 AD9
•• 107828• APPLE ONE '[P1IPOPARY„68_RVICEB.________,__,.,-_„_-,—,_
107829 ARIZ NA INSTR MENi _�—---- - 59.613.60 --— ---INSTRUMENT
_lt 107830 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING $1,893.00 BOIL TESTING X.0.6-14-69
P 107831 RANDOLPH AUSTIN CO. 1L1352•�e _ TUBING ,-
• 107832 B L T HYDRAULICS $56.49 MECHANICAL PARTS
M 307P33 RC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY. INC. $489.91 MECHANICAL PARTS
107934 BACKSTREET CALMLY
107835 BANCROFT-VHITNEY CO. $108.38 -PUBLICATION
�- 107836 P.Y. BABBITT AND ASSOC. 92,037.54 CONSTRUCTION SER7IC6' V1-34-2.P2-37
P_4 837 A X T ER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS
I07fl3B BAYLESS STATIONERS S537.83 OFFICR SUPPLIER
T'S D 107839 BENZ ENGINEERING. INC. SA.E6 MBCBANIUAL pmps
107840 BONNEVILLE CQUIP., INC. }}'jjAS._yReNANE CERTIFICATION._,_„___.__ _
197841 BR INDERSON CORP. 31.?32.'17U.79 CON9TRDGIION J-19-2
'�. 107842 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIY. $302.01 METER REPAIR
• 107P44 BROWN i CALDD L CONSULTING ---- -� �- --- ---$76,433.85�------ - �---ENGINEERING - -_ ._..__.____
1-- VICE!
PI-95.PE-79.J-t9
107845 STEVE BUTALO CONSTRUCTION CO. 3267r419.41. CONSTRUCTION 14-1-12
• 107846 P.R. BURNE INDUSTRIAL CORP.
/07847 BUSH AND ASSOCI ATT.S. INC. $7.575.vo PETTYWE SERVICES US 88-71
�P 107898 GARY G. STREET) A PATT f]67 5 CASK REINBOR8P0ENC
'• 107849 BY-PRODUCTS
147850 CS COMPANY MANAGEMENT _INCt__...._.___._.. __._.. ..} @. 9 §R... . _ .. CIORIDBN 2-89E .. ..._....__ . U
32r396.12 VALVE PARTS
.J 107851 CAL-GLASS FOR PESEARCN. INC, 5476.'12 LAB SUPPLIES
•
107052 CAL-PAC CHENIC_ MEAL CO.. INC. S A I66P CHEMICALS
• 107855 �CAL SOUTH EFMT CO. -- f517.50 - - _ INSTRUMENT REPAI
R
�•' 107854 CALTROL . INC. 6125.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIR
•• 107855 CLL TYPE. OFFICE MACHINES, INC. 5196.94 OFFICE MACHINE
— _ _ _. .. ._ - _ _.. . - TRUCK ESTATES .. _. .. . .._ . -. ... .107856 CALIF OEUTALAU TO COEERSl OX• INC .625.35
J 107858 JOHN CAPRLLA EQUI1'EER$ $325.261 A2 ENGINEERING SERVIC83 PI-36.P1-36.P2-42.P1-20
10705fl CAST POWER A IOIITPM 7 I261.29 TELEPHONE
. _._€9..__. ... . . ._. ..__._.. .._.__. ...____ .. _..__._......._..__ _ . - _ - - TELEPHONE SYSTEM NODIPICATIOR �-
MARK
10 8S9 C .NTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM 11.449.29 J , 107860 CHNIS CER YFLI OOE SSap.Ep ME¢TINC 8%PENSE
J r•
r'
FUND NO 91^9 JT DIST WnI1KIMF CAPITAL FPOCESSING DATE 6/27/9! PAGE t
REPORT NUN9CA AP43
COUNTY S/•NIIAIIUN CIST41CTS OF ORANOL COUNTY
r ...._.—____.___..._ _.. . ._ .. ._ ._ .....CLAIMS FAtO .?/,4/% POSTING DAIS Pi/E9/0 .. .. ... .•.•—._
WARRANT 40. VENDOR 4MOJNT DESCRIPTION
'1 . 107861 CHEVRON U.S.T.. INC, $2.456.39 ELECTRIC GASOLINE
• . 107867 CREEL'S C_LCCTXIF. _ ,--„-., - .91$468.39 ELECTRIC PART
SA68
r 07Fb3 - �fCE4LCTN3 �A{-{Ot! fR00. ....... .95 . ._.. ... SAFETY SUPPLIES .. . _. .
'� • 107864 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $2.J59.65 SAFETY SUPPLIES
107865 COLICH AND SON$ _ _ $142,791.35 CONSTRUCTION 7-117{ ,, ,,, ,,,, ,,,,__, ,,, .,___- .•
MECHANICAL PARTS
'ln ID7867 COMPUSENVE 114.00 COMPUTER SERVICES
10786A CONSOLIDATED ELCCT61CAL 1115T• ___ __ _ $5•J89.36 _______ ELECTRIC PARTS_.,,_____,
i PHItb`— - �- - �f320.Y� BLUCPRIU. N.0.1-10.90
107870 COOPER INDUSTRIES. INC. f620.877.1U ENGINES H.0.5-13-87.6-8-88rJ-19A
u 107871 CORC-ROSION PRODUCTS _ $1,409.00 STOMC6 TANKS
_______.._.._____.__.._____..__._.. _..__
�—COSTA�MESA—FT(10- UT`i•TQ f6.59 TRUER PARTS
1 O 107873 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC S1.299.3R ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
u 107879 CHEMPRO ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $946.11
CHIG_L PE
---- __ _ _EQM ___,__,•.-,-,.,-„________-
o CA $136.75 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
7 107876 OANIELSETIRE SCRVICE S205.13 TIRES
117E 7 TON OAYES' i62 d0 ' MEETING BKPdbBS.____,-„_
.. ...._..........
.__..__
tl DESKTOP GRAPHICS R DESIGN f102.GP -- OUTSIDE PRINTING
7 M 107879 DEZURIK AND/OR IS CO. $3,744.75 Van PARTS
X 107880 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES _ _ _ $811.75 _PRINTING
�-y SVOSAL ON OL $SCR VIpE. INC. 35U•UO TSSYING SERVICES
10788E DIVERSIFIED INSPECTION $834.50 TRUCK PARTS
107803 GUNNEL REDS. MACH MOVING. -._ f1.117 _ SPACE RENTAL
IO7A84 EMA SERVICES. INC. $23,434.55 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-23-2
7 n 1078tl5 FNSECO-CRL f1.007.00 OCEAN SAMPLING
107886 EASTPAN. INC. $1.955.24 OFFICE SUPPLIES _
r107851 W. HTT RCON C. RP. f861 773.0E ZORTOFFICE
2-26-2.7-RI
'3 107889 EL TOED NUMERICS IONS 248.94 INSTRUMENT
ENT SUP REPAIR
107890 ELECTED NUMERICS INC.IC• _ $l,$9U.90 INGINEERING SERVICE
1 7N90 ENCHAO L. EINC. JP. - f961.25 ENGINEERING RING M.G
107892 ENCHANTER. INC. f96970.44 OCEAN ENGINEERING
BERG MA.3-IA-90
107892 ENGINEERING-SCIENCE _ f970.9n __ ___ Rho-ERILG SERVICES
P 9ENGINEERSA I CO• $964.26 TEST PART9
107895 ENIERRN INSTRUMENTATION GRAVEL S969.2R TEST EQUIPMENT
107895 FST SANG AND GRAVEL, INC. S58B.51 8AN0 S GRAVEL_._._.., .___...._._ _.. . .._ ._ _. . __._.. . __. __...,._....._._._._.. _...._.._._..___...___..—.._._._._ ......_._,_..
07897 FARR SERVICE
E• f3.025.19 CONSTRUCTION SBRVICEB J-7-6.J-20.J-17
r 107698 FEDA SALES R SERVICE i2$135.19 AIR
107698 FEDERAL EXFRESS SS CNNP• $N S.UO AIB ME GO
'FiAR-EF"IAAEx'---'--._. .... ...__..__.._. sii R.72 -.__�_..._._.. . .. rueiiDAPioN -"
107900 FFRRELLOAS $34.43 PROPANE
107981 FISCHER A PORTER CO. $5,611.69 CNWEMATION PARTS
9963 —R*C7TTVEnfiD AC c�OFM[fL__...._ _...... . .. .. ... .. .._.CONCRETE CUTTING
....._.
307903 FLUID COMPONENTS. INC. $15.001.U7 METER
107909 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $13.76 FILM
_....._._._. .,., _.._ _. . . .__....___..._ _ ._._.._. ..._ _.._.___. -__ . . . . ....__._...__.__.
FOUNTAINVA FT i --- $2.112.73 INSTRUMENT
SUPPLI89
„) 107906 THE FOR NNRD CO. f2.M1I R•73 INSTRUMENT PART
I o
/\`
FUNLU 9199 JI MIST PORKIMI; CAPITAL ` PPUCF.9SING DATE 6/27/9P I'AGE Y.
REPORT IiUMHEA AP43
COUNTY SA_NIIATION DESTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
LLIINS PRIU�i7/09/90 POSTING DA IE. D7/09/9S
'1r
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
"la 107907 FOAn UIO/JORDAN $30,53 INSTRUMENT REPAIR
107908 FPEDSON P.V. SUPPLY S21.94 TeUCK PARTS
ICT910 GENERAL CHEMICAL $1.049.38 TELXIMS
EPHONE
1079TU GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. fL 849.3P TELEPHONE SERVIGE3
• 107911 GEOq GE LEECH 1 ASSOCIATES ELBf.TBIC_SUPPLI88
107912 GTEPLICH-HITCHELL♦ INC. -- -_--- -� - 039.954.69 MECHANICAL PARTS
' 1n 107913 now GREEK R ASSOCIATES $4,591.42 SURVEYING SERVICES RES 88-72
107914 MA . METING EXPENSE
9 XALCOMPANYF
L _
1901.11 CCHEEICALS
107916 HARBOUR ENGINEERING SR.157.QU MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
101917 IN INOTBN TV
TRIAL PLASTICS __ 188}.� _INSTRUMENT PART
' 107918 JAMES P. HARP TS $629.64 MEETING EXPENSE
1. 107919 HATCH A KIRK. INC. $2,192.15 MECHANICAL PARTS
107920 S. A. HEALY Cn. $30r 312.77 CONSTRUCTION PI-35-1
l 32UB.U6 TBLEPEONE PART
}' 107922 LINDA HIMENES $20.40 MILUGE MERGER
i 107923 `'1 HOFFMAN AIR ! FILTRATION f1311.82 _MECHANICAL PARTS
107924 HOPI70N HIGH-REACH $233.36 TRUCX PARTS ---------
7 r X 107925 HOUSE OF BATTERIES $1,344.36 BATTERIES
107926 R.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. $913.22 SAFETY SUPPLIES
1UT977 CITY OF HUNT_N ON H S 6:54 WATER USEACE
117928 HUNTINGTON BEACH OUBBER STAMP 1884.00 RUBBER STAMPS
0 107029 NUN 1 G. ON SUPPLY' S66,41 HARDWARE
iG 930 HUNTINGTO VA LEY SCXWINN CYCL 11Y6.1B' BICYCLE PARTS
^:� n 107931 HVnROTEX. INC. 18,155:5, ENGINE OIL
107932 ICC INSTRUMENT 17595 METER REPAIR
16793T ISCO,'i NC'. 1410 7.35 -----INSTRUMENT PARTS — -- --
;� ' - 107934 IMPERIAL :VEST CHEMICAL $51,899.56 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.1••08-89
107935 INDUSTRIAL THREAOCO PRODUCTS $1,915.46 CONNPCTOPS
1079 6 INGRAM PAPER ------ 12.599.31 ----- JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ---- -----
;} 107937 INSIDE E.P.A. WEEKLY REPORT $25.75 PUBLICATIONS
107.938 J A W SCIENTIFIC $28.49 LAB SUPPLIES
107939 GR A7 WESTE.R RY S PF. - fgrlO 3B ]ANITORIAL SUPPLIES
j 107944 JAY-S CATCHING 1245.20 METING EXPENSE
197941 A.F. JOHNSON COMPANY $47.79 INSTRUMENT PARTS
• . R7JOHNSTONE SUPPLY
'�•� 107943 KAMAN BEARINGS 1 SUPPLY 11.616.20 SITTINGS
107941 KAMER COMPANY $1.153.42 TOOLS
9 . _ __- 1 �. RSIA.$1 _INSTRIRIBNT
;� • 107946 KFLLEV BLUE BOOK 179.00 PUBLICATION
107947 KENKO. INC. 128,015.30 CONSTRUCTION 5-34-_2
• 374iR--Tt(EVT PA<3FiC CO. - .- f 95 rj95 ai - - 1 - CONSTRUOTION@I-.IE_'- _...____ . . . _ -
,j • 107949 KING BEARING. INC. 14A.35 MACHINE SUPPLIES
107950 LINDA KIRCHIIER f115.CU MEETING EXPEMSB
r __.___ ._.._.._...__.. .___...
107951KIIRt INCH 5TN CEl _SUFVLj��_.�-__...__._...._. _.... . ill S.j9._.___.____. .. . ._ ��m.._.._.. _.._... _
J 117952 MARTIN HOODILN, SP 11,9.11,11 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 14-1—IB
J
FUND NO 9194 - JT DIST PUPPING CAPITAL IPOCLSSING UAIE 6/2119 FACE 9
REPORT NUPFt'q 4P93
CnUNII SANITA11011 DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS YA70 ':7/"9/9i POSTING DATE 117/99/Y1 '
> WARRANT N0. YE NU OR____.__.. , , ,_ AMOUNT - UESCP IP710N_ .
'�. 107953 LAN SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $69.12 SAFETY SUPPLIES
107954 LASER. SUPPLIES S BEPVICE _,. f265.62 _ PRINT SUPPLIES. ._ _
r 10 956 LEY' 6 RCRANDALLi 1MO ENBR. $27.2F1.79 - ENGINEERING
IVIN 98RVIl:g9 PI-37
. 107957 LE NOT CEANDALL A ASSOC. 3939.7E PILE DARTING
• 107959 _ JONN LISEE PUMPS. INC. ,___.__ _ ..._ 12F890..54 PUMP PARTS
10795E X A L TMGIC ROOT f369.00 LAB
PARTS
'lu 107960 MOT BIOLOGIC COMPANY $$29.75 LAB OISERVICES
n I0796P MPS $29.75 PHOTMECHANICAL P RTRY1C68
9 -M 1TR7C NCE��RO C Sr C. -.-__.__..__.t Z i188.67.....-.--____. -._.. . MECHANICAL FAITS __.._.. -_.. _..._.
'l. 107962 MARINE 6 VALVE SUPPLY $2.682.11 VALV85
107963 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $176.93 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
107964 MATT - CMLOR. SS$130.99 UMBEATIOH PARTS
1+ 107966 MEM-CAPE SUPCONTROL
CO. $333.61 BATTERIES
107966 MEASUREMENT LEARNING
SYS. INC. 3333.61 IMSTRUMENT PARTS
9 MICR ' VIA 0 LEAKR SYSTEMS $1,035.94 VIDEO ER SOFeB n 107968 - MICROA&C COME OUTER A1.U35.99 COMPUTER SOPfYARP/NARDVARB
+ SO7969 MICROSOFT QUICK BASIC 4.5 138.63 - COMPUTER PART
!0 9 0 MOTION INDUSTRIES. INC. $2n9.70 NAODIIARB
1. X 107971 NEC INFORMATION SYSTEMS 3379.84 OFFICE SUPPLIES
107972 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSN , f153.92 _ PUBLICAUON
'107973 NATIONAL LUMBER. $230.15 NARDNn:a?�n CU 107974 GUST M• NENBERG CONST. CO. $2.106.552.10 CONSTRUCTION P1-33
107975 NORTHERN BUSINESS GROUP. INC._ 390C:_L',0 __,.____.,OIC¢ATBR CLEANING
107976 O-BRIEN ENERGY SYSTEMS 39.990.09 EMERGENCY GENERATOR REPAIRS
107977 OR SYSTEMS CO. $93,932.80 CHLORINE M.0.2-14-90
107978 ORANGE REARING. INC. S183.22 MECHANICAL PARTS
+� 07979 d_Rl GE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY -----_- --S100.13--- ----- ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
10798E ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $261.79 TRUCK PARTS
v 107981 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. $101-S.61_ . ._ CNFHICAL6
101982 ORANGE VALVE l FITTING CO. 22.279.7E FITTINGS
307983 OXYGEN SERVICE 3576.97 SPECIALTY GASES
1 U798q CSUOC SELF-FUNDED MEDICAL INS _._ $1 U9.7 Q90.90 38LP PUNOBD MEDICAL INSURANCE ADVARC}„_
10798 COUNTY DCLIFFE ON DISTRAIT H$280.00 REIMBURSE WORKERS LD14 INSURANCE�r 107986 P.J. RA OCLIFfE 6 SONS 5280.0E TRUCK
TESTING
107987 PST ,.. _ 591.'13__ ____.._.__ - _. TRUCK 4IASNPARTB
107989 PACIFIC SAFETY ER UIF MENT CD. - 57.165.3U SAFETY SUPPLIES
� + 107990 PACIFIC BELL $272.21 TELEPHJANITOONR SSUPPCES
LIE
10799E PAN YC3T 32T2.21 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
799Y--fiik I511 NL IMIFCN___._.._. ._ -. ... .-._S SAJ.BO _. . .�._._ . . _ . TRUCK PARTS
..___. .. _._ _..__....__..._�
_J r l07992 RIM C. PAT TON f90.Pn MEETING EXPENSE
107993 _FATTEN COMP./ TAILOR INSTR. f1.39q.P1 INSTRUMENT PAR'CS
e 16799E PHOTO L SOUND CO. .365.75 SLUICE MACHINE REPAIRS
j + 107996 PIMA GOO qYS7E"S.VE INC. $93r 365.75 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.N.3-II-88
107996 PLANING NiCS SERVICE CCNTCR H9.34 POLYPHONE F. il' R8PAIR_
p 9 T-� p L3 TPUN C. NC. LIId 71.93 POLYMERS M.O a-100.1-10-90.8-9-09
,J 107998 POSTMASTER $129.00 P.O. BOX RBNLAL
J_
i
F NO 91-9 JT DIST WORKING CAFITAL FPOCESSINL•DATt 6/27/9!: PAGE
^ PEPORT NUYPE.R A143
._ _._._.COUNTY, SAII IIAIJON.,OISTCICTS.OF, ORANGE_C,OUNTT_. ... . _ ..___... .... _... .. ... .._. ....._�_
CLAIMS FATO ;7/ 14/9F POSTING DATE 07/04/90
+ WARRANT NO. Yf HOOP...._ ..__.._..._ . AMOUNT .. IIESCRIPTION _. . .. ..._.......
'�• 107999 POWER ELECTED SUPPLY CO. t14.41 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
• 108000 PRESENTATION C94AWL11 ..-.. RISJ•b 1_....._. .... ._._._._ . OFFICE SUPPLIES _
10800 MR PRIMROSE ICE 9156.00 ICE
'1• 0002 PRIM INTE TEES R FAA 10 S15.00 OFFICE MACHINE REPAIRS
• IOB603 THE OJ[CTS SOLQI LOJI_C_b� __. .. _._._ .._.. .__ _.S4149P•!0_ ._.___.__._ _._ ... INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION_M.O.8-I0-88.
106004 RECYC. INC. t49.2S9.['0 SLUDGE REMOVAL H.0.5-11-88
1" 106005 RED VALVE CO.. INC. $223.90 SALES TAR
' IOfl006 RED Y1NG 5110 .SAFETY S8098 __.__-.. _._... .__. .__.._.._-
108A07 PEMEDY TEMP $1,295.20 TEMPORARY SERVICES
1'. 108000 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. $5.003.66 FITTINGS
• I08009 PILN AROS. VATSON f 6ERSMON __.___ $Y9N7t$ ...___._____.....__LEGAL_HHEYIGeG_M.
108020 J. R. RnRFRTS CORP. f24.194.06 CONSTRUCTION J-7-4
7' 108421 J. R. PORFRTS $125,940.64 CONSTRUCTION J-17 '
• ' IOtl 012 J. R. R08ERTE 121..TD1AA9._—_._-_.--..__SONBTRYCTION..]r.20.__..__.__�..._____
I08013' " ' ROBI NEON FERTILIZER CO. $1,039.65 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
'�,• 189014 - ROYCE INSTRUMENT $1,056.97 INSTRUMENT PART
108015 GOAN t CAE _ $32 t1I25_.27 --___ _LEGAL_SHRYICES_ BEA'RI46lIIIDII_VBS80N.--
108016 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. 166.40 PARTS CLEANER
'X 168017 KEN SAKAM070 t115.00 MEETING EXPENSE
s 108018 SANCON ENGINEERING . INC. --
by 4 00019 SANTA AMA ELECTRIC NOT ORS $407.21 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS
108020 SCHULER ENGINEERING COPP. 9124.01.`8 CONSTRUCTION P1-27-162
--1 100021 SCIENTIFIC ELECTRONICS SERV. s23�.
108022 SEA COAST DESIGNS $432.44 OFFICE FURNITURE
X •nj 108023 SHAMROCK SUPPLY S1.785.93 HARDWARE
w 111 168024 SNEP H�RU MACHINERY CO.
108025 SKY PARK YALN-1N MEDICAL CLINIC $1.419.00 PHYSICAL TRAMS
• 108026 SMITH-EXERT CO. $2,519.50 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89
108027 SOFT W REHOUSE ....._____CONPLjTBH_QPTNARB._—. .._____.___ ._..
108028 SOLAR TURBINES INC. S45.156.25 GENERATOR REPAIR M.O. 5-9-90
105029 SO. COAST AIR QUALITY t10.224.C6 APPLICATION PEES
w 108030 SO. CALIF. COASTAL WA_TER ___..... _J.11135W.e 03 .. ..SCCWRPA ADVANCE
1011031 ' SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. $345.153.14 POWER
7 208032 $0. CALIF. EDISON CO. 95,015.00 FORMS POLE RELOCATION DIST 7 A 14
108033 50. CAO_C0. _.__.. — ... ._ _. ._...1R6 Y.02.____.__..._. .__ NATURAL.GAB_. ..__._.._. ._.. _..._ ....._.___...
108034 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. 92.908.04 DIESEL FUEL
J•• IOBD35 SPARKLCTTS DRINKING WATER S1.387.81 WATER/COOLER RENTALS
l ORD36 VESTALLOT INC. _ _ _ $t t0'.1I,•5 T19LOING SUPPLIBS. ..__.. ........_. _ _.__.._...
I OBOS7 STAR TOOL A SUPPLY CO. $816.11 TOOLS
;� • 108036 SUMMIT STEEL $1,242.37 METAL
9 108039 _._ _ SUPER CHEN CORP t545.0U _ CHEMICALS
CO
1 OBu40 NTINFWTAL ilR__TOUI� lilt. t7.672.63 FOOLS
J• 108441 SUP-LITE CORPORATION S76.398.75 WASTE CAS FLARES M.0.6-13-90
108042 T t C INDUSTP_SAL CONTROj,St.TNT._ ,_. ,.f1.96 Q•TK .,_. ......_. ELECTRIC PARTS_._ _.._. . ... ._.-... ..__
208043 TAYLOR-OU NN SEGE 66 TRUCK PARTS
J IDEA
EBUIPMENT COMPANY S76
.37 SAFETY SIGN
jw
a
FUND NO 91'^^ - J1 AIST VOPKINF C7PITAL PROCESSING, DATE 6/17/9•• $AGE 6
REPORT NUMNLR A. 43
COUNTY SANITAIIOM DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
, -- ------��-��_ - CLAIMS RAIB +•]/.H/9:: PO STAG GATE !'I/69/90
WARRANT NO. VENDOR A40UNT OESCPIPTION
'1 • 108045 TOP INDUSIMIAL $33.02 BUILDING MATERIAL
108046 TRAVEL IRAVFL %726.9L 'TMVEL SERVICES
TRUCK r- URO SUPPLY• IT.C. $396.9 SROCN PARTS
'� • 148049 JAI. TUCKER RC B SON. INC. f196.73 PARCELS T PARTS
• 10P099 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE __ _ f181.18 PARSEC SERVICES
.. _ ___y_.__.._ .__ ____._...____.__.______._ . .. _-___ —_ . .—_.—__.__.—_—___—.__
050 VN E T FLE— S7.6B3.4U LAM SUPPLIES
`1n 10805E VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. f7$115.90 MEETINGS
10805E 053 MICHAEL H. VON ViNCKELM ANN f115.DO 1NSTINQ EXPENSE
% INDUSTRIES ---- ---Tl r151.56 ----- BOOR INSSSALLATION -------- --
108054 CARL WARREN A CO. $838.55 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR
108055 ' WESTERN CORPORATE IMAGES S8.312.89 _ OPFICe BQUIPIBNT __
lU8 RN MIGNVA —PRODUCTS-
, —� ]NC• �2 .0'F MPETY SUPPLIES
(>, 08057 VESTERN PACIFIC EQUIPMENT CO. S756.R8 RENTAL EQUIPNENT
108058 VESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY $34.588.88 CAUSTIC SODA N.0.8-9-89
W.SJKUX..INTERNATIONAL 9T 0 5S— T&UCR PARTS
108068 - WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY S1.934A63 INSECTICIDE
108061 JONN WILEY.S SONS. INC. _ $3.03 PUBLICATION
108062 % R % LUKF. 3 ,510.62 COPIER LEASES
Cjll 108063 ZIEBARTH AND ALPER f56U.216.60 CONSTRUCTION P2-37.P1-34-1
X -----------------
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 07/04/90 f80854.2N5.36
1--i ccczz zzz xzmzz
SUMMARY MOUNT
oz oem FUNDs—rizsae ------- ----
.. 12 CAP PAC FUND _ 176,231.76
93 OPER FUND 323,607.26
v 05 OPER FUND 176.58
05 CAP PAC FUND 28,978.72
07 CAP FAC FUND 183,380.37
011 OPER FIND 16.54
_. _.._._.62:30'_.__
014 CAP PAC FUND 206,332.91
0566 OPEN FUND I.865.20 0647 OPER FUND 2,353.14
07614 OPER FUND 3.348.35
894.769.45
CORP 6,710,901.54
SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP INSURANCE 104.900.52
' ITAL-F0R0 __- 206,970.2E ._.-.._..—
J S 8.854.285.36
J
s.
FUND�.e 9199 - JT DIET WORKING CAPITAL IPOCEBSIHG DATE 7/12/9G PAGE 1�
REPORT NUMHER AP43
COUNTY SAHIISTION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIPS rA ID UT/]H/90 POSTING DAZE 07/I6/90
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
108087 AT E T $490.59 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
108088 ACCURATE AIR ENGINEERING 11BJ.53 AIR FILTERS
,1 108089 LINCOLN CARPETS L INTERIORS $434.66 MINIBLINDS
108090 AERO TECH SURVEYS, INC. 110.700.60 AERIAL SURVEYING OF PLANT 2
108091 AIR ACCESSORIES CO. 1248.50 CONFESSOR PARTS
108092 AIR PRODUCTS E CHEMICAL INC. f30.592.00 0AN AGREEMENT - OXYGEN CAN SYSTEM M.0.8-9-89
1 OR093 AMER.SOC. OF HEAT.. REFRIG. L $110.00 PUBLICATIONS
108094 AMERICAN FLEET PARTS $14.50 TRUCK PARTS
A08095 ROBCO INC. L/OR AMERICAN SEALS $11,412.14 FITTINGS
108096 AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY $1.463.06 PIIA1
108097 AMERITECH $97.75 COPIER CASES
1 OPU98 BLAME P. ANDEPSON $1.652.23 MEETING EXPENSE
^1 l08099 ANTNONY RS NECM. L MACHINE. INC f1.539.12 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
108100 APPLE ONE $800.37 TEMPORARY SERVICES
•> 108101 APPLIED FILTRATION $10,770.61 PIPE STOPPERS
108102 ARA TEX SERVICES. INC. 59.570.83 UNIFORM RENTALS
108103 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PROD.. INC $860.84 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
108104 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING $3,403.00 NIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89
7 X, 108105 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CO. $169.96 TRUCK PARTS
2 108106 B L T HYDRAULICS S48.16 MECHANICAL PARTS
108107 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 1200.948.75 GRIT REMOVAL M.0.7-13-68
7 IONICS BABSON L SHEPPARD $6,000.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES -0IL LUSES
-� 108109 BACKSTREET GALLERY sI.350.81 FRAMING
108110 BANK OF AMERICA NY L SA $5.090.515.11 CERTIF OF PARTICIPATION - INSTALL PAYMENT
108111 BAXTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $2,453.76 UB SUPPLIES
H 108112 BAYLESS STATIONERS $1.103.41 OFFICE SUPPLIES
148113 BISHOP COMPANY $525.27 HARDWARE
NOB 114 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $170.00 TRUCK REPAIRS
108115 BON-A-RUES 5106.25 TRUCK PARTS
108116 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP 939.755.16 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-11
108117 BROWN 6 CALUYELL $6.851.25 LAB BBRVICLS
lOBI1B BROWN L CALDWELL CONSULTING f26.921.58 ENGINEERING SERVICES P2-37
108119 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $226.41 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
.� 108120 GARY G. STREED $370.50 PETTY CASE REIMBURSEMENT
108121 CS COMPANY 36.296.45 • VALVE PARTS
108122 CAL-CHEM SALES $369.69 HARDWARE
J 108123 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH. INC. 31.219.09 LAB SUPPLIES
108124 CALTROL . INC. 167.40 REGULATOR PARTS
108125 CALIFORNIA SUPRESSION SYSTEMS $555.00 HALON MAINTENANCE
.) 108126 CAROLLO-BOYLE ENGINEERS $8,540.32 ENGINEERING SERVICES ..ES 87-131
108127 CEDAR COMPUTER CENTER. INC. $1,359.79 UB EQUIPMENT
118128 CENTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM S45.A8 TELBPF^ E SYSTEM MODIFICATION
J 108129 CHALLENGE BEARING L IND. SPLY $1,564.12 BARONAGE
108130 CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC. $2,297.77 DIESEL FUEL
108131 CHURCH ENGINEERING. INC. $217.13 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-13
J 10R132 COLICH AND SONS $7,901.46 EMERGENCY SEMER REPAIRS DIST 2
FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/12/95 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMHCR AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 37/I8/90 POSTING DATE 07/I0/9A
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
1 108133 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF $12,022.59 COMPRESSOR PARTA
108134 CONNELL G.M. PARTS / DIV. $207.41 TRUCK PARTS
108135 CON-WAY WESTERN CYPRESS $73.62 FREIGHT
108136 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. 39.046.91 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
108137 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS $6,465.94 SLUEPRINTINC M.0.1-10-90
108130 CONTRACTOP`S BOOK STORE $141.76 PUBLICATION
108139 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS WEST $2.047.73 ENGINEERING SERVICES
108140 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $177.30 TRUCK PARTS
108141 CRANE VEYOR CORP. $296.82 PAINT SUPPLIES
1 11111142 CREATIVE SCREEN ARTS 3503.29 SAFETY SUPPLIES
108143 CRYSTAL CLEAR WINDOW PAINT. 32.11S.00 WINDOW CLEANING
I08344 CAL WATER 3190.75 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
10R145 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 34.725.58 STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
108146 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $33,011.00 89'-90' SALES TAX LIABILITY
108147 DAILY PILOT $36.80 NOTICES 6 ADS
7' 108148 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE $364.91 TIRES
108149 OIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $431.27 PRINTING
108150 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. S345.D0 SERVICE AGREEMENT
X 188151 DORADO ENTERPRISES. INC. S1.596.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE A REPAIRS
i 108152 DORR-OLIVER. INC. $850.01 MECHANICAL PARTS
108153 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $1,186.80 PAINT SUPPLIES
to 108154 ERA SERVICES, INC. $12.740.79 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-23-2
--1 106155 EASTMAN. INC. $2.388.85 OFFICE SUPPLIES
108156 EBERHARD EQUIPMENT $166.51 TRUCK PARTS
+ 7: tp 108157 ELECTRONIC BALANCING CO. $500.01 IMPELLER
N 108158 ENCHANTER. INC. $2.280.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.3-14-90
108259 FACILITIES SUPPORT CO. S398.12 TOOL
7, 108160 JOHN S. FALKENSTEIN P.E. $3,562.50 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-1-4.J-20,J-17
108161 FARR SALES 6 SERVICE $557.95 FILTERS
108162 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $336.00 AIR FREIGHT
.� 106163 FERRELLGAS $22.95 PROPANE
108164 FISCHER 3 PORTER CO. $2,689.57 CHLORINATION PARTS
108165 FISHER SCIEN71FIC CO. $127.50 LAB SUPPLIES
.� 108166 FLAT 6 VERTICAL CONCRETE S459.75 CONCRETE CUTTING
188167 FOLSOM LAKE FORD S86.533.81 TRUCKS M.0.5-9-90'
108168 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA SB61.55 FILM
.� 108169 FOX ENTERPRISES 31.825.00 SAFETY CONSULTANT
108270 THE FOXBORO CO. $797.40 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
1081721 CITY OF FULLERTON 3R3.61 WATER USFAGE
I08172
GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. 36.008.81 TELEPHONE SERVICES
108173 GIERLICH-MITCHELL. INC. $17.303.33 MECHANICAL PARTS
108174 HAROLD GOLDBERG $116.75 1/17 BACK-UP CLAIM
J 208175 DON GREEN 9 ASSOCIATES $4.368.75 SURVEYING SERVICES RES 8B-72
108176 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $135.57 GAUGE
160177 MATCH 6 KIRK, INC. 311.409.37 MECHANICAL PARTS
..1 108178 HAUTER FORD S47.738.15 AUTOMOBILES H.O.4-I1-90
J
9i C..
' FUt'.rU 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING OOTE 7/12/9U PAOI.
REPORT NUMBE9 AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF UPA14GE COUNTY
CLAIMS FATD 97/18/9 POSTING DATE 97/I6/9d
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
100179 S. A. HEALY CO. $89341,72 SEWER REPAIR DIST 7
208180 HOUSE OF BATTERIES $116.47 BATTERIES
108101 STEVEN J HOVEY 1495.00 MEETING EXPENSE
100182 R.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. S4.316.26 HARDWARE
108183 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $16.855.52 RATER USEAGE
108184 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STAMP 42.484.21 OFFICE SUPPLIES
108185 ENERGY SERVICES GROUP $922.44 ENGINE PARTS
IOSIA6 IMPERIAL VEST CHEMICAL 569.916.5E FERRIC CHLORIDE N.O.11-08-89
10828T INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS. INC. $707.95 ELECTRIC CARTS
108188 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1.127.15 CONNECTORS
1011189 INGRAM PAPER $118.89 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
108190 INTERNATIONAL SENSOR TECH. $1.361.63 INSTRUMENT PARTS
108191 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $27.07 WATER USEAGE
108192 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP. $460.81 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
108193 JAYS CATERING 1623.5E METING EXPENSE
7 108194 KAMAN BEARINGS R SUPPLY $19.50 FITTINGS
108195 KANEN COMPANY $715.38 TOOLS
fYl 100196 KEENAN SUPPLY $313.62 VAVLE
'X 100197 KEITH-STEVENS, INC. S20.000.00 MAINTENANCE SYSTEM STUDY
Z 108198 KENKS OIL. INC. $170.00 WASTE OIL DISPOSAL
108199 KING BEARING. INC. $8.125.42 BACKING SUPPLIES
7 108200 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $983.71 HARDWARE
—1 108201 MARTIN KOROICK. SR $2.445.10 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 16-I-IB.5-75-1.5-36-1
tw 108202 KRIEGER PUBLISHING CO. INC. $66.60 PUBLICATION
� 1 108203 LASER SUPPLIES R SERVICE $509.79 PRINT SUPPLIES
W 108204 LEE R RO CONSULTING ENGR. $50,010.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-33
108205 LE ROY CRANDALL R ASSOC. S2.663.21 ENGINEERING SERVICES - GBOTECHNICAL
.D 108206 LIFECON-SAFETY SERVICE SUPPLY $276.71 STROBE LIGHT
108207 LIMITOROUE CORP. $1,680.36 INSTRUMENT PART
10820E LOTUS BEVEL. COPR. $366.uO COMPUTER SOFTWARE
108209 A.J. LYNCH CO. $418.20 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
108210 NBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL 16,035.00 OCEAN MONITORING
108211 MACOMCO SIST.20 SERVICE AGREEMENTS
108212 MAIN FRAME SERVICES $860.OC INSTRUMENT REPAIR
108213 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $17.62 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
108214 MATT - CHLOR. INC. S2.826.25 CHLORINATION PARTS
J 108215 DON MAURER S3.350.00 OCEAN STUDY
108216 MAXWELL COLORS $69.66 FILM DEVELOPING
108217 MCKENNA ENGR. R EQUIP. $4.392.07 MECHANICAL PARTS
.� IOP218 MCKINLEY EQUIPMENT CORP 1287.81 EQUIPMENT REPAIR
I U8219 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. $595.33 BENCH
108220 THOMAS R. MELTON $272.37 TRAVEL EXPENSE
.� 108221 MICROAGE COMPUTER $2.492.12 COMPUTER SOMlUU,,'HAU)WARE
108222 MILLAR ELEVATOR SERVICE $2.432.67 ELEVATOR MAIHTPMANSS
108223 PONITEK. INC. $2,114.93 METER PARTS
.� 168224 MONTGOMERY LABORAIOPIFS 56.074.25 LAB SERVICES
J
H
FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING PATE 7/1?/93 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMUE4 AF43
COUNTY SAN17AIlON DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID L'7/IU/9P POSTING DATE �17/10/90
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
.� 108225 MORGAN CRANE CO.. INC. 3199.66
TRUCK PARTS
108226 NATIONAL LUMBER 3526.0C HARDWARE
1U8227 NEW HERMES. INC. i66.93 NAMEPLATE MATERIALS
I OB 228 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $114.45 INSTRUNLNT PART
108229 SY NIELSON SERVICE . INC. $177.50 LAG AFFAIRS
,l 108230 0.M.5./SOLAG DISPOSAL CO 12,425.06 TRASH BIN REMOVAL
108231 OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORP. 386.80 LAB SUPPLIES
108232 OFFICE PAVILION/INTERIOR RES. $1,275.69 OFFICE FURNITURE J-7-5
108233 OM SYSTEMS CO. $32.677.63 CHLORINE M.0.2-14-90
108234 ORANGE BEARING, INC. 1470.35 MEDICARE
106235 OXYGEN SERVICE $883.22 SPECIALTY BASES
1OB236 COUNTY OF ORANGE $6,810.00 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES
1 1OB237 CO UNIT SANITATION DISTRICT $9.245.58 REIMBURSE WORKERS COIF INSURANCE
108238 PSI $563.10 PIKE PART
I OB 239 PACIFIC PARTS ST19.91 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
7 108240 PACIFIC PROCESS EDUIPMENTrINC• 3933.51 VAVVE PARTS
100291 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $998.36 SAFETY SUPPLIES
108242 PACTEL CELLULAR $91.68 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES
7 108297 PAGE ONE $53.13 PRINTING
= 108244 PARTS ENGINEERING COMPANY $111.05 COMPUTER PARTS
108245 PARTS UNLIMITED 3790.98 TRUCK PARTS
7 108246 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS. INC. 147,101.15 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88
--A 106247 PLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE $65.48 HARDWAIIH
108248 PLASTIC INDUSTRIES $304.09 PLASTIC BOTTLES
7� 108249 POLYPURE. INC. 515,933.04 POLYMERS M.0.1-10-90.8-9-89
108250 POWER SYSTEMS $2,927.27 ELECTRIC REPAIRS
108251 PRENTICE - HALL. INC. $57.64 PUBLICATIONS
�. 108252 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE 1104.00 ICE
IO8253 PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEMS $377.62 CONTROL BOARD
108214 THE PROJECTS SOLUTION CO. $3,816.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.8-10-88
108255 PULSAFE EVER 1310.77 PUMP PARTS
108256 PUMP ENGINEERING CO. $10,859.91 PUMP PARTS
108257 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $968.06 TIGER DISPOSAL
108258 RECTC, INC. S40r283.00 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88
108259 R.A. REED ELECTRIC $4,769.32
MOTOR REPAIR
_ 108261 REMOTE METER RESETTING SYSTEM i3$373.46 POSTAGE
J IOR262 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. $135.12 FITTINGS
108263 ROACH WATER TECHNOLOGY. INC. i183.75 VALVE PARTS
1OB263 ROBINSON FER71L12CR CO. $6r1A3.75 WEPJI KILLER
J - 100264 ROSEMONT ANALYTICAL $1,436.57 ANALYSER PARTS
108265 ROSEMOUNT/UNILOC $65.88 FITTINGS
108266 ALBERT G. ROTHEY, LTD. 1527.94 TOOL
.� 108267 RUTAN G TUCKER $23,529.27 LEGAL SERVICES - BEATRICE/RUNT WESSON
108268 JOSEPH T. RYERSON G SON. INC. $267.40 STEEL
108269 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. - $2,716.25 PARTS CLEANER
J 108270 SANTA ANA CANVAS CO. S528.1R ELECTRIC PARTS
J
C �.
FUND "o 9199 - JT DIET WORK IN G,CPPI TPI PPOCE SS ING DATE 7/12/90 PAGE 5t
REFORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 07/18/90 POSTING DATE 07/19/90
VANRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
108271 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT 4 145,715.29 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-13-90
108272 SEA COAST DESIGNS $221.69 OFFICE MACHINE REPAIRS
,1 1O9273 SEAL ENGINEERING CO. $341.75 PUMP PARTS
108274 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $376.36 PAINT SUPPLIES
168215 SHEPHERD MACHINERY CO. $1,970.71 TRUCK PARTS
108276 SKTPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $1,211.00 PHYSICAL EXAMS ,
108277 SH ITH-EMERY CO. $1,347.50 SOIL TESTING M.O.6-14-89
108278 SOLAR TURBINES INC. $1.288.28 TURBINE REPAIRS
,1 208279 SOUTH COAST DODGE SIV2.85 TRUCK PARTS
108280 SOUTH COAST PLAZA 12.510.63 1/17 BACK-UP CLAIM
108281 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. I18v508.64 POWER
108282 SO. CAL. GAS CO. 14.008.02 NATURAL GAS
108283 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $5,117.00 DIESEL FUEL
108284 SOUTHWEST MATERIAL HANDLING $761.55 FREIGHT
1UB2B5 STAMEN Z. SPASSOFF. P.E. 55.280.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-162
1082 6 VESTALLOY INC. $2I0.06 WELDING SUPPLIES -
108287 SPECTRER $629.08 METER
108288 STAR TOOL S SUPPLY CO. $1.804.71 TOOEE
7; X 108289 STERLING ART 573.23 GRAPHIC SERVICES
Z 108290 SUMMIT STEEL $522.54 STEEL
,1, � 108291 SUNSET FORD $22.122.30 TRUCK
198292 SUPER CHEN CORP $658.75 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
y 108293 CONTINENTAL AIR 700L. INC. $2,558.21 TOOLS
108294 SUR-LITE CORPORATION $63.590.63 WASTE GAS FLARES
'7 d 108295 T A C INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS. INC 51.460.7E ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
108296 _ TALIN TIRE, INC. $151.58 TIRES
108297 TAYLOR-OUNN - $152.10 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
7 108298 TEXHATE. INC. $161.02 METER
108299 CHARLES E. THOMAS 1869.20 TRUCK PARTS
.� 108300 TOP INDUSTRIAL 533.46 BUILDING MATERIAL
108301 - TOTAL PREVENTION SYSTEMS 5348.00 ENGINEBERING SERVICES P.-27-1
108302 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE, INC. 5153.70 SAFETY FUPPLIES
108303 TRAVEL TRAVEL $379.00 TRAVEL SERVICES
108304 TRUCK 6 AUTO SUPFLY. INC. $1.020.52 TRUCK PARTS
208305 J.G. TUCKER R SON. INC. $637.62 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
i IOB3O6 U.E. AUTO GLASS CENTER.INC. $116.83 TRUCK PARTS
108307 UNOCAL $279.17 GASOLINE
108308 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $240:29 PARCEL SERVICES
IOB309 VVR SCIENTIFIC 11,897 88 LAB SUPPLIES
J 108310 VALIN CORPORATION $464.34 REGULATOR PARTS
108311 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $8,166.97 HARDWARE/FITTINGS
208312 VERTEX SYSTEMS 57.250.0U COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
J 108313 VICI METRONICS $306.56 MECHANICAL PARTS
108314 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $877.16 SAFETY SUPPLIES
208315 VILLAGE NURSERIES $572.08 GROUND COVER
J 108326 JOHN R. NAPLES $531.50 ODOR CONTROL CONSULTANT
J
V
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/12/9U PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 07/18/90 POSTING DATE P7/I0/9,1
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
108317 WATERMAN SUPPLY S398.44 CHAIN
108318 WEIR OIL CO. 224.09 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
108319 WESTERN PACIFIC EQUIPMENT CO. $451.84 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
108320 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY S37.556.37 CAUSTIC SODA H.O. 8-9-89
108321 WESCO $296.86 ELECTRIC PART
ID8322 XEROX CORP. $7,192.36 COPIER LEASES
168323 GEORGE YARDLEY COMPANY $397.30 .VALVE PARTS
108324 EVERETT H. YORK CO. 5512.58 ENGINE PARTS
I0S325 LUCY ZINNIA. INC. $5,250.06 1/17 BACK-UP CLAIM
-----------------
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 07/18/90 S6.SJ4.635.51
j, - SUIDNRY AMOUNT
/1 OPEN POND { 501.00
41
O1 COAST POND I,012.054.87
7 x 02 OPER FUND 32.441.43
02 CAP PAC POND 951.05
to @ COAST FUND 1,928,951.OS '
. 03 OPER FUND 14,049.63
-4 03 CAP PAC FUND 2.045.74
03 COAST FUND 2,090,062.65
)' 7i 05 UPeR FUND 4.382.56
0S CAP PAC FUND 4,364.12
16 OPER POND 525.75
7� 17 OPER FUND 11.173.64
07 CAP FAC FORD 42,237.95
011 OPER FUND 1,373.51
J ' 019 Sim PING
014 OPER FOND 22.00
B14 CAP PAC FUND 3,850.46
05G6 OVER FUND 3,537.99
JT OFER FUND 729.738.03
CORP 368,265.20
SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FUND 17,122.96
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND 191,899.56
J $-6,SB4,695r5i-
., $ 6,504,550.51 .
U
J
RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 6(b) qs_&�
�l ROBERT L "BOB" CITRON
U COUNTY TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR
ADMINISTRATION
FINANCE BUILDING
NTY O F RM. 209. 600 N. BROADWAY
P.O. BOX 4515
SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92702
��Ir6iFtAkN
GE o14) 904-2911
"'7OFFICE OF THE TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR
August 10, 1990
Mr. J. Wayne Sylvester
General Manager
Orange County Sanitation Districts
P. 0. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Dear Mr. Sylvester:
As the Treasurer for the Orange County Sanitation Districts, the
following is my fiscal year-end report for the interest earned for the
Districts. The attached Financial Statement of the County Treasury is
to be made a part of the overall statement to the Sanitation Districts.
Would you kindly place this report on the next applicable agenda of the
governing Board of the Orange County Sanitation Districts.
In the fiscal year 1989-90, we earned for the Districts total interest
earnings of $19,681, 121.69. The gross yield on the Districts' earnings
was 9. 10%. The net yield was 9.02%. Therefore, it cost the Districts
.08% or $15,744 to manage the Districts' funds. We believe this is a
small charge for the quality of service in managing the Districts'
funds.
The County Treasury has managed the Districts' funds for many years.
We do not take for granted this financial service that we provide the
Districts. We look forward to continuing our many years relationship
in the coming fiscal year.
Sincerely, �N.^
Robert L. Citron
County Treasurer-Tax Collector
RLC:jg
Enc.
\..�
RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 6(b) - Q 1Iz14 0
STATE OF UFORNIA GEORGE DEURMUTAN,Governor
CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD
SANTA ANA REGION
09 INDIANA AVENUE.SUITE 200
JERSIDE,CALIFORNIA 92606
HONE:1714)782-4130
August 14, 1990
Mr. J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
P. 0. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92708-8127
RE: JULY 26, 1990, SEAL BLACK COMPANY SPILL
Dear Mr. Sylvester:
This is to express the Regional Board's appreciation for the
assistance provided by the Districts during the cleanup operations
for the above-referenced spill of asphalt sealing materials into
the East Garden Grove - Wintersburg Channel, Garden Grove. Your
staff reacted quickly and professionally to a spill situation which
could have caused significant environmental damage to Huntington
Harbour and the Bolas Chica Wetlands.
Ed Hodges was our first contact concerning the spill, and he
responded very quickly to accept into the sewer system the upstream
"nuisance" water from the channel. This allowed our cleanup
personnel to dike up the spilled materials without also having to
deal with more than one million gallons of uncontaminated nuisance
water.
Subsequently, Jim Benzie and Kelly Christensen provided invaluable
assistance in addressing the disposal of channel water which had
come into contact with the sealer material. We would also like to
recognize the contributions of the CSDOC inspectors who monitored
the operation on your behalf .
The actions of the public agencies involved in the cleanup of the
Seal Black Company spill were a model of effective inter-agency
cooperation. The Districts played a most important role in this
effort.
Again, thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
hdt; �J. Thibeault
Executive Officer
CC. Regional Board
James Baetge, Executive Director
State Water Resources Control Board
Bill Zaun, Orange County Environmental Management Agency
RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 6(b) � � � '�`9/ �° 4 � Iz /q0
9-10-30 i 8:28AM :CLEAN WATER PROGRAM
d� NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS .
ww� v �uawrv.ce Section 6 Page
Renew the waiver
When the City Council recon- invited attorneys to submit ar- also exists for requiring sec-
siders an overhaul of San guments about his authority to ondary treatment for wastewa-
Diego's sewage system tomor- explore the question of whether ter emissions along coasts
row,It should direct the city at- the federal sewage standards where ocean depths are shallow
torney to renew efforts to get are needlessly stringent for San far out to sea.
an exemption from a federal Diego. But to hold cities such as San
law requiring expensive sec- If convinced he has jurisdic- Diego, where near-shore ocean
ondary sewage treatment tlon, Brewster has said he depths are deep, to the same
When the city agreed last would conduct a trial at which strict standard appears to be of
year to build the secondary the scientists would testify. questionable environmental
treatment system mandated by This raises the possibility, valut
federal law, a council majority albeit very slim,of San Diego's
was convinced that a waiver of obtaining an exemption from Ironically, the EPA is paying
the secondary treatment re. the Clean Water Act through the $300,000 cost of a study of
quirement was out of the ques- the courts. the environmental Impact of
tion. . As the system is now ocean sewage which may sub-
Now that view has been planned, with mandated sec. stantially support the case for
disputed by U.S. District Judge ondary treatment, construction - waivers. The study, began in
Rudi bL Brewster, who presid. would cost $2.8 billion. Without May, Is being conducted by the
ed over last year's agreement secondary treatment, this cost National Research Council, an
that settled the suit against San would be reduced by nearly one arm of the National Academy
Diego by the Justice Depart. third. of Sciences.
ment and the state of California The challenge to the Clean If secondary treatment is a
for, violations of the federal Water Act, as it applies to San needless waste of money, it
Clean Water Act and the state Diego,has merit.The law's sec- would be foolish to build it into
water plan. ocdary wastewater treatment San Diego's new sewage sys-
,Impressed by scientists who standard was written largely to tern. The City Council should
say that secondary treatment is protect inland waterways that support Judge Brewster's
unnecessary and may actually provAe drinking supplies to cit- strong lead to renew the
harm the ocean, Brewster has ies downstream. A strong case waiver.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
.1 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
September 12, 1990 ,a ELL49 AVENUE
Pa Roe 9+2e
AWWAiN VAUJI CAuioBMA 92728.e+27
p,A.9923A„
DIRECTORS' WORKSHOP
RE
DEBT FINANCING
During the course of developing the plan for financing the Districts'
"2020 VISION" master-planned capital facilities, many Directors have expressed
a desire for more information on the subject of municipal debt financing. The
Districts' approved financial plan calls for financing approximately one-half of
our $1.5 billion in capital requirements over the next 30 years by issuing debt
securities.
Accordingly, a Directors' workshop has been planned for Wednesday, September 19,
1990 at 5:30 p.m. in the Districts' Administrative office. The financial team
consisting of Districts' staff, the underwriters and bond counsel , will give a
presentation on the background for the Districts' financial plan, general
information on how municipal debt financing works, the legal/tax implications
and the alternatives under consideration. Directors will also have ample
opportunity to ask questions and exchange ideas.
A light meal will be served at the beginning of the the workshop. In order to
allow staff to plan for the workshop and dinner please indicate below whether or
not you will be attending and leave this form in your meeting folder.
0 YES, I will attend the workshop on Wednesday, September 19th
0 NO, I will be unable to attend the workshop on Wednesday, September 19th
Director's Name (printed)
Signature
REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN
SEPTEMBER 12, 1990
1> UPCOMING MEETINGS
ai
A. DISTRICT 2 SELECTION COMMITTEE - DISTRICT 2 SELECTION
COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY,
SEPTEMBER 19TH AT 4:30 P.M.
B. DIRECTORS ' WORKSHOP RE DEBT FINANCING - A WORKSHOP ON
DEBT FINANCING IS SCHEDULED FOR DIRECTORS ON WEDNESDAY,
SEPTEMBER 19TH AT 5:30 P.M.
C. FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE IS
SCHEDULED TO MEET ON THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 20TH, AT 5: 30 P.M.
D. JOINT WORKS SELECTION COMMITTEE - THE JOINT WORKS
SELECTION COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON TUESDAY,
SEPTEMBER 25TH, AT 11:30 A.M. (THAT'S A CORRECTION OF
THE ORIGINALLY-NOTICED TIME)
E. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED
TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY , SEPTEMBER 26TH AT 5:30 P.M.
( INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS TO ATTEND: )
WAYNE SILZEL
aND
HARLES SYLVIA '4 E-0
-
OR -
(WAYNE WEDIN)
- OR -
(EDNA WILSON)
D. CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE - THE
CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE IS
SCHEDULED TO MEET ON THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 27TH AT 5:30 P.M.
- END OF REPORT -
f4F 7jNG DATE September 12, 199U TIME 7 :30 P.M. DSTRI,n 1,2,3,5,6,7, 11, 13 6 14
V DCa TFRCTI JOINT BOAROB
(CRA,q ........WANNER ...... ✓ (91AWVERI .................ALLN........✓ .
(EDGAR) .......!NNIGQR...... --k✓ — AGE1 ......................ARNOD ......✓ —
(YOUxB) ........Gmu ....W.. 4/ (aREFN)....................GNONTER ...
JC - -
IROB9..........3TARGN ..... JC .� MEDAA) ...................WRIGER ....JL— —
(NOABY)....................cA N .......J1C —
(KumuER) .................COL..........JL — —
NLINTETO .......PN.MER ...... V NAwI......................C4VFA ......yG —
(Scorn MEAL .......... (PUIXEm-................EDGAR ....... . —
CwEnAA) ........BOOHGRN ....JC (MAHONEYI .................GRAIAN......JL —
(NOR BY) ........CAT ......... (ONESSEM .................GRGFN.......JL — —
roOn) ........GRNET ........ (YOUNG) ...................GRGET ....... —
(GRAK04.......M�.....JC — (KUMMM .................HART.........JC —
(cuVER) .......NUM .........JC— IGRAIMM) ..................MANDNEV..... . — —
(WED..........NELSON.......JC— (GLVEM...................WM ......... . —_ —
(ECRBa1OOE1 ...NEWTON......�j! (9GVA) ....................I m..........✓ —
(SADARN4 .....S.—........JZL (scorn ....................MEAL......... JL— —
(SARN RwM ......sMTTII .........r— (VEDW) ....................NELSON ......
(RORq..........STANTON .....JC—
MlRl1FAI...................PIOGER ...... Jle — —
DM1..TRICi3 MART) ..... JL................ 0.0�®1....: — —
(IIwEM .........SIEFEM........ MNEM ....................lOY ........JL —
(SNAvv .........s1EFEN .......✓ — — (EDGAR)...................1 1USONM ..... —
(sHAWNER.......ARNO .........JC (STAHRI................... R..+. ......(AGE)N) ........S
A
NDID ......JL (SfAMOM .................RGIN.......... — —
NORBR ........csmm.®1.... . __ (coi) ONO).................@"S ....— —
MOAh ........GTISN........ JL — — DulLNGNq.................S116iA11 ....JC- —
mw ..........CULVER.......JG — — "LESI ....................SOl1 ....... —
(LWUNEY)......GRA AW......JL — (seLDANR.................Q�........ —
(CHEssBR ......GIIIPFSI.......JL/— MARREM) .................SIM ........JC
Wi —
(YOU ) ........GR seT ....... JG/ _ (RO BfIHfOx(ROTA ................ .....Y
—
(scO1n.........REK ......... JL N.,EW....................WAR ........JC - -
(VaDRR.........N6sON.......JG— (WAHLSTROIR ..............SYLVA .......J` - -
NtNTEM .......PICILER ...... . (CaANxrER YMAx9REEM ..WAINEA...... —
(RORR..........STANTON ..... ✓ — (Sq ER) ................WETAA ........ —
(WA LSTRO" ...MW........ JG— (xElswl...................weBIN.........= —
Msaq........maces ......JL — (A.Raq ...................WLsGN........ — —
DLSTRICTS (GREEN).................... —
(RNLaER)......HART
......... ✓ —
(cO1a' ........... ..... ✓ —
(STA TOM ......ROTH......... . —
OMMICT6 STAFF OTHER
(HAT) ..........PLOGIER ..... )� MVESTER......... ✓ WOODRUFF ........WANNER IDE...........—
ISTANTOM ......ROTH.........JC— ANDERSON ......... ANWAR .......—
DLSTRICf 7 GAWSON .......... yL DEMO ........—
DAWES............. FLEMRO......
—
MARRERA) ......sNGTH ........JN! HIODGES ..........I— HOHIENER.....—
(PUGlLTi) ......EDGAR-.......yl KYLE...............JC HOUGH .......—
(PLUMNETII......DOL ..........JC— UNDER............. HOWAD......
—
(YOUtiR ........GTRsu .......Y NELSON............— HUM.........—
(STAMONI ......ROTH......... HI ............I::::-- KNOPF........
—
MAmmowm) .....SHEAIOMN.....JC OOTB1............. LINDST ...—
(GREEN) ........WARIER ......JC sTN®............y LYNCH........—
VNCBR ...........JL STONE........—
DLSiA1L:T1T VON LARGER .......— WASW .......—
(GREEN) ........YIPS....... — V NSOR............— YOUNG .......(SLVA)..........MAYS.......... — C? . .d F(RORR..........STAHRON .....J! 0.1�aN
DISTRICT 13 LAB ^ �., f1. ZaL,xay�FL`
NELSON) q .....
NELSON) .......
(STANTOM ......POTN......... 1G_ —
(BARBARRERN ......BMRNN ........ y„�_ —
MMICT IA
ILLER) ........SWAN.........
.InA4NOHM .....SHERIDAN...
. �F .
\/(EDGAFR ........POffpU9..... 1!— —
(sTANfOM ......ROOI....... J"CT
l6ARRERN ......SMRH ........ r -
- OSIONSO
PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
9/12/90 BOARD MEETING
NAME ORGANIZATION FIRM
lease Print Please Print
9/12/90 JOINT MEETING NOTES
�s 96(a) - Report of the Joint Chairman
Joint Chairman Catlin reported that since the Board adopted the Financial Plan
last year as part of the 2020 Vision Plan, several Directors had asked for
additional information on municipal debt financing so the staff has scheduled a
workshop for the following week on September 19th at 5:30 p.m. Representatives
of staff, underwriters and bond counsel will be present. He requested that
Directors complete the pink form in their meeting folders indicating whether or
not they would be attending this workshop.
He also commented on other inserts in the Directors meeting folder, including a
letter from the County Treasurer-Tax Collector which indicated that the total
interest earned on the investment of the Districts' funds for fiscal year
1989-90 was $19.7 million. He requested that this report be received and filed.
It was so moved, seconded and duly carried.
Another communication received was a letter from the Regional Water Quality
Control Board expressing appreciation to the Districts' for the assistance
during a cleanup operation involving a spill of asphalt sealing material into
the East Garden Grove - Wintersburg Channel in July. He added that there was
considerable press about the spill from the oil company in Garden Grove. He
noted that the Districts have a policy of helping wherever they can.
He then called the Directors' attention to the article from the San Diego Union
newspaper. He reported that last year when the Districts were going through
the wastewater management plan process, the Boards were considering appropriate
levels of treatment for this program. There was considerable controversy in
San Diego about withdrawing their waiver application. A judgment was brought
against the City. The State of California is now reconsidering. The County of
San Diego is now joining in in support of granting a waiver. The
Committee of the National Research Council is studying this more. Blake
Anderson is serving on this Committee.
The Joint Chairman then reported that the Districts were pleased to have
received a "Gold• award from AMSA for complete and consistent level of
treatment, etc. ???
He then called various meetings. SEE ATTACHED REPORT.
/6(c) - Report of the General Counsel
The General Counsel said there were a couple of items later in the agenda for
Districts 3 6 11 and Districts 6, 7 8 14 that he would address at that time.
#11 - Job Nos. J-19-1 and P1-34-3 8 PI-35-2
Tom Dawes reported that these projects totaled $33 million. The Districts
previously awarded contracts for new primary treatment for increased sludge and
digester gas. That evening two large contracts were to be awarded for a central
generator at this plant. Will use digester gas produced by digestion of sludge
as fuel which will go into new clean-burn engines to produce power to run these
plants. This totals $65 million but the Boards have approved a couple of
�..i contracts previously. Seven of the eight engines have been received. The
Boards have authorized $20 million to build Central Generation Facilities at
Plant No. 2. Showed slides of proposed project. It is a $16 million project.
The second project--contruction of six new digesters at this treatment plant and
rehabilitation of two older digesters. Will be the largest digesters at the
Districts--110 feet in diameter. Will provide enough capacity until 2000 at
this plant. Recommended approval of the plans and specifications.
Director Polls questioned why this would only take us to 2000, 10 years. Tom
Dawes replied that this is digester capacity, but we will require additional
digesters at Plants 1 and 2. The increased secondary treatment expansion is
planned also. Will have more digesters soon so we can retain our sludge longer.
The useful life of these digesters is dependent upon amount of grit built into
these things so have reserve capacity for that.
MOVED 8 SECONDED TO APPROVE. MOTION CARRIED.
S12 - Supplement No. 1 to Program EIR re Job No. I-9
Tom Dawes reported that in July 1989 the Districts adopted a Master Plan and
EIR. There were three items of work not included: (1) Offsite reclamation
plant; (2) Offsite sludge reclamation facilities; and (3) Interplant corridor
(19,000 feet). This project is for construction of a new sewer that will
deliver clean water from Plant No. 1 to the outfall booster station at Plant
No. 2. It includes piping, industrial water line and communications cable. Is
about a $33 million project. We have to coordinate the project with the Santa
Ana River project of the Corps of Engineers. The long-term issues considered
in the Draft Supplement were growth accommodating effects and the short-term
effects were construction effects associated with all large jobs. The biggest
concern is keeping the bike trail open on the Santa Ana River levee while
project goes on.
He added that to date, we have received very few comments on the EIR, just from
a couple of governmental agencies that really had no comment. Referred to
various actions listed on agenda. They were then MOVED, SECONDED AND APPROVED
by unanimous ballot.
015 - ALL DISTRICTS Other Business
Peer Swan noted that the County Assessor was going to start collecting fees for
tax assessment services. He asked if there would be an increase in the cost or
an impact on the Districts? Also, have the Districts been notified that this
is going to increase costs? Gary Streed replied, yes, this will be increasing
the cost from 1/4 to 1-1/4%. Have not computed the impact on the Districts yet.
M23 - DISTRICT 2 re Contracts 2-26-3, 2-28 8 2-29
Tom Dawes reported that Directors have been working on Master Plan facilities
for District 2 for a number of years. He pointed out the various work that had
been done so far on aerial maps of the areas. He noted that seven bids had been
received for this project and recommended award to the low bidder in the amount
of $7,953,755.
026 - DISTRICTS 3 6 11 re Aarmt with JCE re Contract No. 11-17
Tom Dawes reported that in May and June the Directors took actions on facilities
to serve the northwest portion of District 11 and a portion of District 3. He
then showed a slide of the proposed Slater Pump Station improvements. He said
that the pump station is a bottleneck in the large collection system. The
actions previously taken were to approve a cost-sharing formula between
Districts 3 and 11. At that time, it was proposed to include provision for the
Bolsa-Chica area. Today Bolsa-Chica is not in any District. We have worked
with the landowner for several years. The first action requested that night was
to approve a revised agreement between Districts 3 and 11 without the
Bolsa-Chita area. Second, to approve an addendum to agreement with John Carollo
Engineers. He advised that the initial construction project for the Slater
�..i influent line and pump station is estimated at $7.0 million. We want to be
ready with our plans when the City of Huntington Beach is ready to resurface.
The pump station will be in General Telephone's parking lot on Slater Avenue.
Peer Swan asked, is Signal Landmark not going to participate, is there provision
for expansion? TMD answered, no. If Signal elects to develop later, will have
to construct their own facilities in Coast Highway. This was not a smart
decision for them but it was their choice. There is a new landowner now and
staff will be talking to them the next day. He added that there is no advantage
to defer these actions. Will come back to Board if need be. Until we go to
bid, we are flexible. Will start plans in the next few months.
Peer commented that if there is a question, thought it would be prudent to delay
going ahead and give these people a chance to come in. TMD said we have tried
to make that clear to them for some time. The City of Huntington Beach has been
very accommodating by restricting development. Have been trying to talk to the
for four months. Catlin suggested that staff give a report to the Executive
Committee regarding their discussions with the new owner.
Culver questioned why increase in Carollo's agreement went from $44,738.00 to
$694,121.00? Tom Dawes explained that the original contract was to prepare a
Project Report that defined the project and set forth the costs. That was
completed. The scope of work provided that the Selection Committee could then
negotiate with the same engineer to prepare plans and specifications for the
pump station and several miles of sewage facilities. We like to run these an an
addendum but in many ways this is a complete new project including surveying and
everything.
#31 - DISTRICTS 6, 7 8 14 re Contract 14-1-1A
Tom Dawes reported that to build the portion of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor
through Costa Mesa, the City has insisted that the pipe not come through Harbor
Boulevard. We have had to realign it along the northern boundary of the Mesa
Verde Country Club. We are negotiating with the Country Club to go inside
property line. Negotiations have not gone particularly well . This job is
getting critical. If need be, we are, in fact, condemning property for
right-of-way required. He added that they objected because the pipe is
initially above the ground but we are covering it with a burin. He then
reviewed the requested actions on the agenda. He noted that these two actions
are totally independent of each other. Recommended approval.
N34 - DISTRICTS 7 8 14 re Contract 14-1-2
Tom Dawes reported that Directors have previously awarded a contract for a
portion of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor from Irvine and Tustin to Plant No. 1.
The project to be designed is for installation of a force main between Main
Street Pump Station and Bristol Street and includes two 42-inch diameter
pressure pipes. We are installing two for reliability. We could put all of the
water through one if we had a break. The required easements from the Airport
have been obtained. The cost of this project is estimated at $7 million. He
recommended approval of plans and specifications.
-3-
REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN
SEPTEMBER 12, 1990
1> UPCOMING MEETINGS
A. DISTRICT 2 SELECTION COMMITTEE - DISTRICT 2 SELECTION
COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY,
SEPTEMBER 19TH AT 4: 30 P.M.
B. DIRECTORS' WORKSHOP RE DEBT FINANCING - A WORKSHOP ON
DEBT FINANCING IS SCHEDULED FOR DIRECTORS ON WEDNESDAY,
SEPTEMBER 19TH AT 5:30 P.M.
C. FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE IS
SCHEDULED TO MEET ON THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 20TH , AT 5: 30 P.M.
D. JOINT WORKS SELECTION COMMITTEE - THE JOINT WORKS
SELECTION COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON TUESDAY ,
SEPTEMBER 25TH, AT 11:30 A .M. (THAT'S A CORRECTION OF
THE ORIGINALLY-NOTICED TIME)
E. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED
TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26TH AT 5: 30 P.M.
( INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS )
WAYNE SILZEL
AND
CHARLES SYLVIA
- OR -
(WAYNE WEDIN)
- OR -
(EDNA WILSON)
D. CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE - THE
`, . CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE IS
SCHEDULED TO MEET ON THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 27TH AT 5: 30 P.M.
- END OF REPORT -
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 69 7, 119 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
ON
SEPTEMBER 12, 1990
PNJTATfo
ysoo1w. poST
N
ORgNGE co
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held an September 12, 1990,
at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of
Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present
for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11,'13 and 14 as follows:
ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO. 1: x James A. Wahner, Chairman Orma Crank
Charles E. Puckett, Chairman pro ten x Richard B. Edgar
-7—Dan Griset Dan Young
x Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 2: x Iry Pickier, Chairman Fred Hunter
x James Neal, Chairman pro tern —George Scott
x Roland E. Bigonger —_Henry W. Wachs
z A.B. "Buck" Catlin Chris Norby
x Dan Griset _—Dan Young
x William D. Mahoney _Beth Graham
x Robert H. Main Norman Culver
x Carrey Nelson _Wayne Wedin
x Arthur G. Newton _Norman Z. Eckenrode
a Wayne Silzel _Harold Saldarini
x Dan E. Smith Fred Barrera
x Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 3: x Richard Polls, Chairman _Eva G. Miner
x J.R. -Bob" Siefen, Chai man pro tem _Dewey Wiles
x Edward L. Allen David J. Shawver
7—Margaret M. Arnold —Cecilia L. Age
x Wes Bannister _Peter Green
x A.B. "Buck" Catlin _Chris Norby
x Norman Culver _Robert H. Main
x Beth Graham _William D. Mahoney
x Don R. Griffin _Donna L. Chessen
z Dan Griset _Dan Young
x James Neal George Scott
x Carrey Nelson __Wayne Wedin
7—Iry Pickier _Fred Hunter
-7—Roger Stanton _Dan R. Roth
x Charles Sylvia _Robert Wahlstrom
z Edna Wilson Frank Laszlo
DISTRICT NO. 5: x Evelyn Hart, Chairman Ruthelyn Plummer
Phil Sansone, Chairman pro tem x John C. Cox, Jr.
x Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 6: x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chaiman _Evelyn Hart
-7—James Wahner, Chairman pro tem James M. Ferryman
x Dan R. Roth _Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 7: x Don E. Smith, Chairman _Fred Barrera
-!—Richard Edgar, Chairman pro tem _Charles E. Puckett
x John C. Cox, Jr. Ruthelyn Plummer
z Dan Griset —RogerDan Young
x Don R. Rath _ Stanton
x Sally Anne Sheridan _Barry Hammond
x James Wahner _Harry Green
DISTRICT NO. 11: Grace Winchell, Chairman x Peter Green
x Tam Mays, Chairman pro ten Jim Silva
x Roger Stanton Dan R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 13: x Henry W. Wades, Chai man Roland E. Bigonger
_Wayne Wedin, Chairman pro ten x Carrey Nelson
x Iry Pickier —Fred Hunter
x Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
x Don E. Smith _Fred Barrera
DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chairman _Darryl Miller
x Sally Anne Sheridan, Chairman pro ten _Barry Hammond
x Leslie A. Pontious Richard B. Edgar
7—Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
x Don E. Smith Fred Barrera
-2-
09/12/90
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager,
Rita J. Brown, Board Secretary, Blake
P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary
G. Streed, Corinne Clawson, Penny
Kyle, Charles Nichols, Jack Vincent,
Patti Gorczyca, Gary Hasenstab,
Adriana Renescu, Jo Klak
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel ,
Clark Ide, Jamel Demir, Walt Howard,
Bill Knopf, Kris Lindstrom, Phil
Stone, Tom Richardson, J. A. Catalano
x x x x x x x x x x x x x
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman reported that a
Report of the Joint Chairman District 2 Selection Committee was
scheduled to meet on Wednesday,
September 19th, at 4:30 p.m.
He announced that a Directors' Workshop on Debt Financing would be held on
Wednesday, September 19th, at 5:30 p.m.
Mr. Catlin advised that the Fiscal Policy Committee was scheduled to meet on
Thursday, September 20th, at 5:30 p.m.
He also noted that a Joint Works Selection Committee was scheduled to meet
on Tuesday, September 25th, at 11:30 a.m.
The Joint Chairman then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for
Wednesday, September 26th, at 5:30 p.m. , and invited Directors Wayne Silzel
and Edward Allen to attend and participate in the discussions.
Chairman Catlin also reported that the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse
Committee was scheduled to meet on Thursday, September 27th, at 5:30 p.m.
ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that in
Report of the General Manager response to Directors' requests for
additional information on municipal
debt financing, a workshop on debt financing had been scheduled for
Wednesday, September 19th, at 5:30 p.m. He advised that staff and
representatives of the underwriters and bond counsel would be making
presentations and would be available for questions. Mr. Sylvester requested
that Directors complete the form included in their meeting folders
indicating whether or not they planned to attend this workshop.
Mr. Sylvester also commented on a letter included in the Directors' meeting
folders from the Regional Water Quality Control Board expressing
appreciation to the Districts for their cooperation and assistance in
connection with the cleanup of a spill of asphalt sealing material into the
East Garden Grove - Wintersburg Channel in July. . He pointed out that the
services provided by staff were in keeping with the Districts' policy of
cooperating with all state and local agencies in environmental matters.
-3-
09/12/90
The General Manager then called the Directors' attention to a newspaper
article which was published in the San Diego Union to connection with the
ongoing controversy relative to the appropriate level of treatment of
wastewater to be discharged into the ocean in the San Diego area. He noted
�...� that the City of San Diego had applied for a waiver from secondary treatment
requirements pursuant to Section 301(h) of the Federal Water Clean Water
Act, but had subsequently withdrawn their application. There has been
considerable press on the issue recently including testimony from several
scientists that expressed their belief that full secondary treatment was
unnecessary and a waste of public funds. The article indicated that the
City was reconsidering the waiver and that the County of San Diego had
joined in support of renewing the application. The Federal Court will be
reconsidering the consent decree between the City, the State of California
and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency that requires full secondary
treatment.
Mr. Sylvester added a relevant note that a committee has been established by
the National Research Council to study the impact of wastewater management
activities in coastal urban areas, and advised that the Districts' Director
of Technical Services has been appointed to this committee.
Mr. Sylvester then advised that he was pleased to report that the
Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) had presented the
Districts with the 1989 "Gold" award for their consistent compliance with
all terms and conditions of their wastewater discharge requirements.
ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that a
ReceTv-e-a-nd file letter from communication had been received from
Orange County TaxCollector- the Orange County Treasurer-Tax
Treasurer re interest earned on Collector on theA nvestment of
Districts' investments durinq reserve funds which indicated that
fisca year 1 9- 0 the total interest earned on their
investments of the Districts' funds
for fiscal year 1989-90 was $19.7 million, a net yield of 9.02%. It was
then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the letter from the County Treasurer-Tax Collector, dated August 10,
1990, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held August 8, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held August 8, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held August 8, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held August 8, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
-4-
09/12/90
DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held August 8, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or `..�
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held August 8, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held August 8, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meetings held July 11, 1990
and August 8, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held August 8, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratification of pa ent of Joint
and Individual District claims That payment of Joint and individual
District claims set forth on pages
"A", "B", "C" and "D" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and
summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in
the amounts so indicated.
7/04/90 7/18/90
DISTRICT NO. 13
Carried over from 8/08/90 Mtg.) -0- $ 85.00
8/01/90 8/15/90 8/29/90
ALL DISTRICTS
Joining Fund - $ 1,070,523.05 $ 691,508.67 $ 923,796.52
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 7,6789772.93 1809397.13 7,027,301.19
Joint Working Capital Fund - 133,149.36 129,677.93 162,306.31
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 196,040.66 9,792.72 12,781.28
DISTRICT NO. 1 - 34.77 -0- 1,085.63
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 217,793.46 167,018.66 8,289.84
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 216,850.54 159729.01 594,675.17
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 694,908.69 28,569.57 250,352.81
DISTRICT NO. 6 - 830.36 182.00 27.84
DISTRICT NO. 7 - 197,496.78 16,149.46 52,353.73
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 97.06 13,081.38 639.09
DISTRICT NO.13 - -0- -0- -0-
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 127,842.12 16,659.39 142.608.22
DISTRICTSN0ST5 8 6 JOINT - 3,679.87 -0- 4,901.43
DISTRICT NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 3,589.59 -0- 32.10
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 8 14 JOINT - 5,382.92 8.92 3,919.69
10,546,992.16 $1,268,774.84 ,918 ,070.85
-5-
9/12/90
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approv ng ange Order o. 1 o e
tans and s ecifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans
Job NO. J- 4 and specifications for Installation of
�...� Replacement Influent Meters, Job
No. J-24, authorizing an addition of $18,227.37 to the contract with
P. R. Burke Industrial Corporation for two items of additional work, be, and
is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
A rovn ane Orer 5. 4 tote
l ans an s ec f cations re That Change Order No. 4 to the plans
Job o. PI-FI-JJ and specifications for Primary
Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related
Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33, authorizing an
addition of $87,272.00 to the contract with Gust K. Newberg Construction
Company for four items of additional work, and granting a time extension of
six calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby,
approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving han a Order No. to the
Tans and s eci ca Ons re That Change Order No. 5 to the plans
Job No. Pl-33 and specifications for Primary
Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related
Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33, authorizing an
addition of $608,121.00 (to be paid by Orange County Water District) to the
contract with Gust K. Newberg Construction Company for one item of
additional work, and granting a time extension of eight calendar days for
completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Appr2Ving hangs rder No. 4 0 the
laps and s ecifications re That Change Order No. 4 to the plans
Job NO. P - -2 and specifications for Sludge Handling
Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1,
Jab No. P1-34-2, authorizing an addition of $58,066.57 to the contract with
Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. for eight items of
additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Au horizing the Selection Committee
to nego late a Professiona That the Selection Committee be, and
Services Agreement with K. P. is hereby, authorized to negotiate a
Lindstrom, Inc. for environmental Professional Services Agreement with
consulting services K. P. Lindstrom, Inc. for
environmental consulting services to
assist staff on NPDES Permit activities; regulatory and legislative liaison
activities; and for technical support for sludge management, air quality,
reclamation and conservation issues and in connection with CEQA compliance
for Master Plan projects.
-6-
09/12/90
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Prof_e_ssional Services
Agreement with ordon W. oyyt for That the Boards of Directors hereby
specialized consulting engineering adopt Resolution No. 90-117, approving
services re negotiating a_ rate Professional Services Agreement with
structure agreement with 5CEC Gordon W. Hoyt for specialized
consulting engineering and negotiating
services to assist staff in negotiating a rate structure agreement with
Southern California Edison Company in connection with the Districts' new
Central Power Generation Systems at Plants 1 and 2, on an hourly-rate basis,
for a total fee not to exceed $50,000.00 plus out-of-pocket expenses. Said
resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adopting procedure for destruct on
of obsolete records That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 90-118,
pertaining to the procedure for destruction of obsolete records and
repealing the inconsistent provisions of all other resolutions previously
adopted by these Boards of Directors with respect to destruction of obsolete
records. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of
these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizin renewal of Membersh
in the ants Ana River Flaad That renewal of membership in the
Protection Agency SARFPA Santa Ana River Flood Protection
Agency (SARFPA) for fiscal year
1990-91, be, and is hereby, authorized; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That payment of membership dues in the amount of $1,400.00,
be, and is hereby, authorized.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Amendin Classification and
Compensation Resolution No. /9-7 That the Boards of Directors hereby
as amended, re management and adopt Resolution No. 90-133, amending
supervisory salary range Classification and Compensation
adjustments Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, re
management and supervisory salary
range adjustments. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a
part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions relative to approval of
new master-planned treatment
plant construction projects Job
Nos. J-19-1, I'L-J4-3 8 PS-35-2Z
Verbal staff report The Districts' Director of
Engineering gave a brief overview
of three upcoming treatment plant construction projects.
Central Generation Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-19-1, is one
of several phases of work for central power generation systems at both _.
-7- �..r�
09/12/90
treatment plants which started in 1984 with the preparation of a
digester gas utilization study. This project evolved through studies
and consultations with Directors, regulatory agencies and various
consultants. When complete, these facilities will fully utilize the
energy value of the Districts' digester gas, a by-product of sewage
treatment, by using it as fuel in new state-of-the-art, clean-burn
internal combustion engines to power generators which will produce
electricity to operate the treatment plants. The generated power will
have an estimated value of about $9 million per year and will almost
fully offset purchases of power from Southern California Edison. He
noted that the engineer's estimate for this work is $16 million.
Mr. Dawes further reviewed the status of projects authorized by the
Directors as part of the Master Plan program to maintain and increase
treatment capacity at Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley. The projects now
ready for approval include construction of six new sludge digesters
(Job No. P1-34-3) and the rehabilitation of the two remaining older
digesters (Job No. P1-35-2), to provide the added facilities necessary
to process increasing sludge volumes. It was pointed out that the
engineer's estimate for these two projects is $33 million.
A rovin tans and specifications Moved, seconded and duly carried:
for o No. J-1 -1
That the Boards of Directors
hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-115, approving plans and specifications
for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, and
authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of
bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of
these minutes.
A rovin lane and s ecifications Moved, seconded and duly carried:
for Job Nos. P1- 4- and P1- -
That the Boards of Directors
hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-116, approving plans and specifications
for Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1,
Job No. P1-34-3, and Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at
Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-2, and authorizing the General
Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re u emen No. 1 to
Program Env ronmen a Impact Report
for ollection, Treatment and
Disposal Facilities Master Plan re
Job NO. -
Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering reported
that in 1989 the Directors approved
the updated Master Plan which provided for facilities necessary to meet
flow increases and regulatory discharge requirements for the next
30 years. Also approved was an Environmental Impact Report which
addressed most of the master-planned projects. However, three projects
included in that document were only able to be addressed in a general
manner and were designated as needing further review and additional
CEQA documentation when the project was ready to begin the design
phase. The Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9, is
one of those projects.
-8-
09/12/90
The project includes a new 120-inch sewer outfali that will deliver
treated effluent from Plant No. 1 to the ocean outfall booster stations
at Plant No. 2. Also included is utility piping and communication
cables.
Mr. Dawes reviewed the actions taken thus far with regard to CEQA
requirements. He advised that the Draft Supplement No. 1 addresses
both the short-term construction effects and the long-term effects of
the project. He noted that of one item of concern that would be
addressed was keeping the bicycle trail open along the Santa Ana River
levee during construction of this project. He further advised that a
public hearing was scheduled for October 10, 1990 relative to said
Draft Supplement No. 1.
Receive and file comments received Moved, seconded and duly carried:
on the Notice of Pre oration of
Supplement No. 1 to said EI That the comments received on the
Notice of Preparation of
Supplement No. 1 to said EIR be, and are hereby, received and ordered
filed.
Receive and file Staff Report and Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Draft 5upplement No. 1 to EIR
That the Staff Report dated
September 5, 1990 and Draft Supplement No. 1 to said EIR be, and are
hereby, received and ordered filed.
Authorizing the General Manager to Moved, seconded and duly carried:
file a Notice of Completion of
Draft Supplement No. 1 to EIR That the General Manager be, and
is hereby, authorized to file a
Notice of Completion of Draft Supplement No. 1 to said EIR.
Fixin the date, time and lace for Moved, seconded and duly carried:
public hearin an Oraf u lement
No. 1 to EIR That October 10, 1990, at
7:30 p.m. , in the Districts'
Administrative Office, be, and are hereby, fixed as the date, time and
place for public hearing on Draft Supplement No. 1 to said EIR.
Establlshing October 10, 1990 as Moved, seconded and duly carried:
the final date for receipt df
comments on Draft Supplement No. 1 That October 10, 1990, be, and is
to EIR hereby, established as the final
date for which all comments must
be received on Draft Supplement No. 1 to said EIR.
DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 & it Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Creating 1990 Construction Funds
That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt the following Resolutions creating a 1990 Construction Fund in each
respective District:
District Resolution No.
1 90-120-1
2 90-121-2
3 90-122-3
5 90-123-5
6 90-124-6
7 _ 90-125-7
11 90-126-11
Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these
minutes.
-9-
9/12/90
ALL DISTRICTS Staff was requested to assess the
Requesting staff o assess the Impact of SB 2557, adopted as part of
impact oP b3 Z557 re Property iax the last-minute 1990-91
AdIaln1stration Fee budget-balancing agreement between
the Governor and the legislature that
would allow counties to charge other local governments for the casts of
property tax administration, and report back to the Boards.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
a _ purnment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:59 p.m. , September 12, 1990.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:59 p.m., September 12, 1990.
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly tarried:
Establ shin 199 - 1 c ar es for
Class C ass II and lass That the Board of Directors hereby
industrial waste perm ttees adapts Resolution No. 90-109-13,
establishing 1990-91 charges for
Class I, Class II and Class III permittees, pursuant to provisions of the
uniform Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage
Facilities, as follows:
1990-91 INDUSTRIAL USER RATES
Class I 8 II Fee Class III Fee
1 owi.S.L-1 B.O. * ow
$430.64 $154.58 $120.98 $1,005.17
*Flow - Per million gallons of flaw
*S.S. - Per thousand pounds of suspended solids
*B.O.D. - Per thousand pounds of biochemical oxygen demand
Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:00 p.m., September 12, 1990.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Addendum No. 2 to the
Professional erviCes A reement That the Selection Committee
With Will an Associates for desi n certification of the final negotiated
and construction services required fee relative to Addendum No. 2 to the
re ontract NOS. - - an - Professional Services Agreement with
Willdan Associates for design of
Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Broadway and Orangethorpe
Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-3 (including City of Anaheim Street Improvements) ,
and Katella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street (Ninth),
Contract No. 2-28, providing for additional design services necessary to
incorporate changes recommended by CALTRANS and the Cities of Anaheim and
Fullerton, and for other miscellaneous changes required re Contract
No. 2-26-3, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and,
-10-
09/12/90
FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution
No. 90-128-2, approving Addendum No. 2 to the agreement with Willdan
Associates for said additional services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor
plus overhead, plus direct expenses and fixed profit, for an additional
amount not to exceed $51,500.00, increasing the total authorized
compensation from $145,578.50 to an amount not to exceed $197,078.50. Said
resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
Director Don R. Roth requested that his abstention from voting on these
motions be made a matter of record.
DISTRICT 2
Actions re approval of addendum to
laps and Spec'"
and award
0,,Ian,
Contract os. 2-26-3 2- 8 and
2-2 to Steve Bubalo Construction Co.
Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering gave
an overview of the District 2
master-planned facilities which have been under design and construction
for a number of years. He pointed out on aerial maps the projects
completed thus far and the proposed alignments of Contract Nos. 2-26-3,
2-28 and 2-29. Mr. Dawes explained that the projects were combined for
bidding purposes to realize cost savings inasmuch as most of the pipe
is the same size.
Contract No. 2-26-3, Portion of Euclid Interceptor between Broadway and
Orangethorpe Avenue, will include City of Anaheim street improvements
on Euclid Street between La Palma Avenue and the 91 Freeway, in
accordance with a cooperative agreement with the City.
The Katella Relief Sewer, Contract No. 2-28, will connect the Euclid
Interceptor Sewer to the South Anaheim Sewer extending from Euclid
Street and Katella Avenue about one-half mile east to Ninth Street,
relieving the South Anaheim Sewer and the downstream Newhope-Placentia
Trunk Sewer.
Mr. Dawes added that the Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29,
will also help to relieve the Newhope-Placentia Sewer in State College
Boulevard by diverting flows t0 the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer.
The Director of Engineering reported that seven bids had been received
and recommended award t0 the low bidder in the amount of $7,953,755.00.
Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried:
lams and s ecifications re
contract Nos. 2-26- - 8 and 2-29 That Addendum No. 1 to the plans
and specifications for Portion of
Euclid Interceptor, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract
No. 2-26-3 (including City of Anaheim Street Improvements); Katella
Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street (Ninth Street) ,
Contract No. 2-28; and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29,
clarifying traffic requirements and bonus/penalty provisions, be, and
is hereby, approved.
-11_ �"�
09/12/90
Awardin Contract Ntls. 2-26-3 Moved, seconded and duty carried:
2-28 and 2-2 to teve Baba o
Construction o. That the Board of Directors
hereby adopts Resolution
No. 90-127-2, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation
�a..� and awarding contract for Portion of Euclid Interceptor, between
Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-3 (including City
of Anaheim Street Improvements); Katella Relief Sewer, between Euclid
Street and Walnut Street (Ninth Street), Contract No. 2-28; and
Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29, to Steve Bubalo
Construction Co. in the total amount of $7,953,755.00. Said
resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adiournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:07 p.m., September 12, 1990.
DISTRICTS 3 8 11
Actions re a regiments between
Districts 3 and 11 and with John
Carollo Engineers for financing and
design cf master-planned sewage
system improvements
Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering
reported that in June 1989 the
Directors approved a Professional Services Agreement with John Corolla
Engineers for preparation of a Project Report relative to Slater Avenue
Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17. The
current system is at capacity and improvements have been held in
abeyance pending the outcome of discussions with property owners of the
Balsa Chica area concerning annexation of the area to District No. 11.
The owners have apparently decided not to annex at this time.
Included in the Project Report, which was approved by the Boards in
May 1990, was a cost-sharing formula for financing and provisions
establishing each District's capacity ownership of the proposed
facilities, based on anticipated annexation of the Balsa Chica area to
District 11. Originally, the cost-sharing agreement provided for a net
payment of $630,836.00 by District 3 to District 11. However,
Mr. Dawes further reported that inasmuch as the property owners of
Balsa Chica have decided not to proceed with annexation to the
District, District 3 will own a larger share of the system capacity
now, and, therefore, the payment amount to District 11 must be revised
to $699,636.00. He noted that the revised agreement listed on the
agenda provided for this change in capacity ownership of the respective
Districts.
Directors questioned whether there was a possibility the new landowners
of the Balsa Chica area would change their mind regarding annexation to
the District. Staff advised that for months they had attempted to meet
with the new owners to resolve the question of annexation but that they
had been totally unresponsive. However, a meeting had finally been set
for the following day, September 13th. He stated that there would be
no advantage to deferring the recommended actions listed on the agenda
until after that meeting because the project is urgently needed.
However, Mr. Dawes stated that if the staff's recommendations change
after the meeting, the matter would be returned to the Boards for
further action, if necessary.
-12-
09/12/90
The Director of Engineering also reported that the Professional
Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for preparation of a
Project Report relative to Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System
Improvements provided for negotiations with the consultant for design
and construction support services relative to the Slater Avenue Pump
Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17. He pointed out
that this work is included in proposed Addendum No. 1 to the Agreement
for preparation of the Project Report, but in many ways it is a
complete new project including design, preparation of plans and
specifications, surveying and other construction support services which
is the reason for the large adjustment. Mr. Dawes recommended approval
of said addendum.
Approving revised Agreement between Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Districts 3 and�rovidin f
financing, design, ns co ructionor That the Boards of Directors
ca acit ownershi and operation o hereby adopt Resolution
cer aim sews a collection No. 90-129, approving revised
racilities Agreement between County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 3 and
11 providing for financing, design, construction, capacity ownership
and operation of certain master-planned sewage collection facilities
for serving Districts 3 and 11; and rescinding Resolution No. 90-53
adopted by the Boards on May 9, 1990. Said resolution, by reference
hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Professional Services A reement
with John Carol12 Eng neers for That the Selection Committee
reparation of Project o Re rt re certification of the final
Contract NO. 11-17providing for negotiated fee relative to
design of said project Addendum No. 1 to the
Professional Services Agreement
with John Carollo Engineers for preparation of Phase I Preliminary
Project Report for Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System
Improvements, providing for final design of Contract No. 11-17 and
construction support services re said project, be, and is hereby,
received, ordered filed and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution
No. 90-130, approving Addendum No. 1 to said Agreement with John
Carollo Engineers for said additional services, on an hourly-rate basis
for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses and fixed profit, for an
additional amount not to exceed $649,383.00, increasing the total
authorized compensation from $44,738.00 to an amount not to exceed
$694,121.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a
part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m. , September 12, 1990.
DISTRICT 11. Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m. , September 12, 1990.
-13-
09/12/90
DISTRICTS 6, 7 8 14
Actions re Baker- 1sler Interce or
rpm Fairview Roatl to Plant NO.
on Fact o. 14- -
Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering
reported that in July 1990 the
Boards certified Supplement No. 1 to the EIR for Proposed Formation of
District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving
Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13, pertaining to the
Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Contract Nos. 14-1-1A and 14-1-1B, and Baker
Force Mains, Contract No. 14-1-2, and approved the projects for
construction. The Supplement addressed the changes to the project
since conception, as well as identifying final alignment and pipe size.
Mr. Dawes reviewed the recommended alignment of Contract No. 14-1-land
pointed out that in accordance with the requirements of the City of
Costa Mesa, the sewer could not go through Harbor Boulevard. He
advised that three property owners had objected to the proposed sewer
alignment through their property. Staff and General Counsel have been
unable to negotiate the purchase of easements necessary from these
three property owners required for construction of Contract
No. 14-1-1A. Mr. Dawes added that one of the property owners, the Mesa
Verde Country Club, had filed a legal action against the Districts
challenging the Districts' actions relative to compliance with CEQA
requirements re aproval of Supplement No. 1 to said EIR. He pointed
out that the two actions listed on the agenda were independent of each
other even though they both pertain to Contract No. 14-1-1A.
Mr. Dawes reported that the General Counsel had determined that eminent
domain action may be the only recourse if continued negotiations were
unsuccessful .
Receive and file Memorandum from Moved, seconded and duly carried:
General Counsel
That the Memorandum from General
Counsel dated September 5, 1990, be, and is hereby, received and
ordered filed.
Receive and file Petition for Writ Moved, seconded and duly carried:
of Mandate and Application for
Injunctive Relief, Mesa Verde That the Petition for Writ of
ountr ub vs. ount Sanitation Mandate and Application for
Districts of range County, Injunctive Relief, Mesa Verde
California, Case No. b346dO Country Club vs. County
Sanitation Districts of Orange
County, California, Case No. 634680, relative to compliance with CEQA
requirements in connection with Districts' approval of Supplement No. 1
to the EIR for Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14
and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of
Districts Nos. 7 and 13, required to assess the impacts resulting from
the final designed alignment of Contract Nos. 14-1-1A, 14-1-1B and
14-1-2, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel 'be, and is hereby,
authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts.
-14-
09/12/90
Fixing the date, time and place Moved, seconded and duly carried:
for public hearing on the adoption
of a Resolution of Necessity re That the Boards of Directors
acquisition of property by eminent hereby adopt Resolution
domain No. 90-131, pertaining to setting
the time and place for a public
hearing on the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity to order the
acquisition of certain property by eminent domain required in
connection with the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to
Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A. (Hearing Date: October 10, 1990,
at 7:30 p.m. , at the Districts' Administrative Office). Said
resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:20 p.m., September 12, 1990.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ortlering Annexation No. 1 4 -
Sauthwest Diversified Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby
adopts Resolution No. 90-134-7,
ordering annexation of 28.735 acres of territory to the District in the
vicinity of the northwest corner of Santiago Canyon Road and Windes Drive in
unincorporated County territory (Annexation No. 134 - Southwest Diversified
Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ordering Annexation No. 135 -
Williams Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby
adopts Resolution No. 90-135-7,
ordering annexation of 2.50 acres of territory to the District in the
vicinity of the southeast corner of Lemon Heights Drive and Lower Lake Drive
in unincorporated County territory (Annexation No. 135 - Williams Annexation
to County Sanitation District No. 7). Said resolution, by reference hereto,
'is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ordering Annexation No. 138 -
Gable Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby
adopts Resolution No. 90-136-7,
ordering annexation of 2.905 acres of territory to the District in the
vicinity of Cowan Heights Drive and Overhiil Drive in unincorporated County
territory (Annexation No. 138 - Gable Annexation to County Sanitation
District No. 7). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a
part of these minutes.
DISTRICTS 7 8 14
Actions reae to a rd
plans nd sv ppns vaol rof
Contract 14-1-2
Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering
reported that the Board had
previously awarded a contract for a portion of the Baker-Gisler
Interceptor, between Bristol Street and Fairview Road, Contract
No. 14-1-1B, which was nearly complete. The second reach, Contract
No. 14-1-1A (between Fairview Road and Reclamation Plant No. 1) is
currently awaiting acquisition ofseveral easements necessary for
construction.
-15-
09/12/90
He further reported that in April 1990 Directors approved an agreement
with the County of Orange relating to the acquisition of permanent and
temporary easements in the John Wayne Airport Main Street parking lot
for construction and operation of the Baker Force Mains, from Main
�..✓ Street Pump Station to Bristol Street, Contract No. 14-1-2. The
project was designed with dual force mains to minimize long-term
pumping costs while providing the reliability of a second conduit
should one fail . Included within this two-mile long project is a
tunnel under the San Diego Freeway from the west side of John Wayne
Airport property to the pump station. Mr. Dawes advised that the
engineer's estimate for this work is $7 million.
Approving lans and s ecifications Moved, seconded and duly carried:
for Contract No. 14-1-
That the Boards of Directors
hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-132, approving plans and specifications
for Baker Force Mains, from Main Street Pump Station to Bristol Street,
Contract No. 14-1-2, and authorizing the General Manager to establish
the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is
hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:23 p.m. , September 12, 1990.
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:23 p.m. , September 12, 1990.
becretary of the Boards of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14
...
-16-
FUND( 9199 - JT GIST WORKINS CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/1219D PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
fp NTY
CLAIMS PAID 0/18/90 POSTING DATE 07/19/90
WARRANT NO. V NQQE___ AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
IOP317 WATENMAN SUPPLY S39A.44 CHAIN
S29.09 BEPUND_�SER FEE OVERPAVVRNT
_. 108319 WESTERN PACIFIC EQUIPMENT CO. S451.84 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
1D8320 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPFLY 537,536:37 CAUSTIC SODA M.O. 8-9-89
---------WES6➢—_ ___. E23.6.r_@6 E1.8CPRIC FART _
IOA322 YEFOA CORP. $7.192.36 COPIER LEASES
IC6323 GEORGE YARDLEY COMPANY s397.30 VALVE PARTS
__...-24E121 _.�FyEMGTi NiTgRK CO, f'y1RJS.6 ENGINE PARTS _
_ 108325 LUCY 2AMRAN. INC. $5.250.06 1/17 BACK-UP CLAIM
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 17/lb/99 $6.5J4.635.51
SUMHARY -- AMOUNT
X i1 OPER FUND_ S 750.00_ it CONST PUND
1,0 ,0 .
Ctl _ 72 OPER FUND 12 12.05454.8787
i2 CAP PA_C FUND 441.43
y _—_i2 "MST FUND .—.--__—.-
1.928,951.05
/3 OPER FUND 14.069.63
13 CAP FAC_FUND 2,045.74
03 CONST FUND -------'-- —'---"------- 2,090,062.65
i5 OPER FUND 4.382.56
/5 CAP FAC FOND 4,364.12
33.
07 OPER FUND 11.173.64
64
07_CM FAC FUNp '
_ .p.___.....__.__ 42,_237.51
1 585.00
il3 'PER FUND 85.00
__ ._ _ _.'PER FP
i14 CAP AC
—
, 0.46
7566 OPER FUND 5,537.99
JT OPER FUND . 729.738.03___ ___ _
CORE _. . . _... . _. _
SELF FUNDED WORKERS CORP INSURANCE FUND 17.122.96
.]T DIST WORKING CAPITAL I= 191,899.56
6,504,635.51
FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/25/9: PAGE I
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION 51STRICTS OF ORANGE COUNT♦
CLAIMS
WARRANT NO. VENDOR 4MOUNT DESCRIPTION
108344 A014SON UNIFORM A EQUIP. S2.059.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES
3OP345 ADVANCED COMPUTER PRODUCTS.INC 1846.43 COMPUTER HARDWARE
"--�Ti47�8Ef30-- CBNSTROCTIBB'PIA� ""
108347 AIR PRODUCTS L CHEMICAL INC. S30.726.34 BAN AGREEMENT - OXYGEN GEE SYSTEM H.0.8-9-89
108348 LEASING ASSOCIATES/ALLSTATE $1,333.32 AUTO LEASES
. 1 -----nstEDEER"ART
108359 AMEN/CAN CRANE INSTITUTE S2.80U.06 TRAINING CLASS
108351 AMERICAN FLEET PARTS $22.25 TRUCK PARTS
EilCS^'--- "---S2i39R.�i. 9— —ZIEDBANICRCPAEx —
108353 AMER. SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLGT $65.00 MEMBERSHIP DUB
1OB354 AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY $758.56 FILM
A
108356 ARCO VALVE L PRIMER CORP $945.63 VALVE
100357 APPLE ONE S}C119.20 TEMPORARY SERVICES
0—_—__...--ltIT0�00-- —OCEAN"SARPLIRG
108359 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $154.00 INSTRUMEM REPAIR
108360 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CO. S6.250.60 ' TRUCK PARTS
•fTl 108]62 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $119.922.96 GRIT REMOVAL H.0.7-13-88
X 108363 BRW SAFETY L SUPPLY $1.646.88 SAFETY SUPPLIES
PRIMING
-
CRT 208365 BANCROFT-WHITNEY CO. $67.66 PUBLICATION
1 00366 P.Y. 9400TT1 AND ASSOC. $6.562.50 CONSTRUCTION P1-34-2,P2-37
3�7
55".Ull DEFENSES CUM DISTRIBUTION
CO 100368 BARTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS - $2.653.15 LAB SUPPLIES
1 108369 BAYLESS STATIONERS ST3.57 OFFICE SUPPLIES
• -AS— TT�2ZD.�II EHIRC-SEHVrM-DTE£T-
108371 HOWARD BLEVINS $200.00 DEPERREB COMP DISTRIBUTION
106372 BLUE DIAMOND MATERIALS $396.67 CONCRETE
108374 9DVLE ENGINEERING CORP t82.277.40 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-14,14-1-1L2
108375 BREA PRINTING $1.347.25 PRINTING
• • .BP— CON$SROCSIDN - -
108377 BROWN 6 CALDYELL $1.595.00 LAB SERVICES
168376 BROWN 6 CALDYELL CONSULTING $134.794.73 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19
i ca. 3•MTE:i4 CONSTRUCTION - B
108380 F.R. BURKE INDUSTRIAL CORP. $76.813.26 CONSTRUCTION 3-24
108381 ^USH AND ASSOCIATES. INC. $13,590.00 SURVEYING SERVICES BES 88-71
—.""_.____T673:16-" �ExxY"773R7RIEBURB
106383 BY-PRODUCTS MANAGEMENT. INC. $348.95 "GROSS CHLORIDE N.0.4-12-89
108384 CS COMPANY SS•163.76 VALVES
S GISTRATION
104366 CAL.CHEM SALES $241.93 HARDWARE
108367 CALTROL • INC. $21,100.40 REGULATOR PARTS
MACHINES. -�fIITl.50 TYPERETTER-UtHT9.0M-
108389 CARLETON ENGINEERS $7.611.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES M.0.5-9-90
FUND 1. 919S JT DIST ROARING CAFIIAL PROCESSING DATE 7/26/90 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID FF7UT7lTf--FWING DATE 08/02/10
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMDUNT DESCRIPTION
10839D JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS f503.469.95 ENGINEERING SERVICES I-9.P1-20.91-34
108391 CENTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM f1.666.4B _ TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATION
+ IVE392 CHALLENGE BEARING & IND. SPLI f367.9 HARDW
198393
CHEW
OpLE PpoHgU75 SA NG• f66596 NEAOeD GASOLINE
TAN z♦910,
C Eu6 00 ENGINEERING SERVIC
ES J- -4
T. . S., .GP 95 Hq0 R3HAF.H MACHINE REPAIR
,,.... 106396 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT f1.301.2U MAINTENANCE ACRCEPfT
nT_IDA397 COAST INSURANCE AGENCY f38.586.00 INSURANCE
Rom_____...—_.3isS:3�7D -- CONSTH O — — 6
108399 C.I.C.S. • CO. . INC. $2,216.34 MACHINE SEEMS
108400 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF 95,507.13 MECHANICAL PARTS
108401 COMPUTER WORLD $58. B SUBSCRIPTION
):+ lOB4C2 CUMPUSERVE $9.37 COMPUTER SERVICES
IOP403 CONAPP.S PHOTOGRAPHY $672.33 PHOIOCFUPBIC SERVICES
CUNNELL U.N. PART u:S2�--` TRUCKPART ..
108405 CDNSOLIDATEO ELECTRICAL DIST. $6,149.03 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
fP1 5 100406 CONSOLIOATED FREIGHTYAYS $67.74 FREIGST
X 108407 C N . 78. CHLORINE M.O. -
2 + 10948P CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS 94.026:35 BLUEPRINTING M.0.1-I0-90
` 1080C9 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS YESI $115.00 CONSULTING - G60'feCNwICA1 SERVICES
108410 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC ��.$�-- ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
-4 108412 CRANE VEYOR CORP. f399.60 PIPE -
100412 CREDIT MARNE7S $525.00 PUBLICATION _
tz 89 qY RIT TRU R 6 EQUIPMENT 3.99 . SLUDGE REMOVAL M.O.4-13-88
N + 100914 CYbER EO • f2.250.00 MAINTENANCE AGRCEENT
�• 100415 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 3177.34 DIESEL USE TM
_ �'F1Y.35— NECDARICAL.PAR S
100417 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE $993.14 TIM
10841E RE ANZA CORPORATION $150.00 STORAGE
10841 pEZUP.IR N / C D. $465.B3 VALVE
108420 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $3.034_.04 PRINTING
IDS421 BOLLINGER CORP. 11.976.27 MECHANICAL PARTS
195422 DORADO ENTERPRISES, INC. —�!•4�5.�--BHT-7NTEKM�LE 6 118PAI E .
108423 GUNNEL BROS. MACH MOVING $1.452.10 SPACE RENTAL J-19A
308424 DUNN EDY ARD$ CORP. $1.792.69 PAINT SUPPLIES _
02 [ MAN• 1 C. i ♦4 OFFICE SUPPLIES
300426 Y. M. EMERY CORP. $125.030.00 CONSTRUCTION 5-35-1
k.1 JUP427 ECOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING 6 ANALY c f6.325.CG OCEAN MONITORING:� 4z rvrvrsu3C�TN77IRS— ---- __ PAE9ENTAIION AIDS
108429 ELECTRONIC BALANCING CO. $390.89 IMPELLER REPAIR
M• lOB1J0 ENCHANTER. INC. $4.800.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.3-14-9D
G' Ile.31 ONST. COYLE 6 LACH06-IC-7 $97M.119 LEGAL SERVICES - OXFORD PROPERTY
IRY432 MARSHALL FAIRRES $174.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
ICS433 FARR SALES 6 SERVICE f252.92 FILTERS _
0434 A NFAe$9-CSDF. --_— 349D.-0 D..—._�. _..--.AIR FREIGHT
;. 108435 FERRELLGAS 134.43 PROPANE
��L
FUND AO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/26/96 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS FAIU 757-JIlVU —PUNTING DATE
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
. • 10843 FIS i PORTER CO. $3.315.59 ICAL PARTS
I08437 FISHER
HU SCIENTIFIC CO. 51.195.31 LAS LAB S SUPPLIES
r lY278-- FILMFIELP!CONCRETE CDfC[ G
108439 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $21.78
FOUNTAIN VALLEY TRANSIT MIX i32/.9R COSCPET¢nTww
INSTIftlalfr PART
IO8442 FOFBORO CO. / MA6 SYSTEMS $1.198.33 INSTRUMENT
I DP 9A3 FOABORI 1RUC AN. INC f1.19B•33 INBm PUT PART
.-- �I1 S.72—._ -- TRUCK PAR
208495 A.F. FREY fID5.D0 DEPENDED COMP DISTRIBUTION
1O6446 FRICTION INCORPORATED $868.03 REFUND USSR FEE OVER PAYICOiT
HSANAML LURHER GD, S550.11P BUILDING MATERIALS
'108/98 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1.940.96 TELEPHONE
1O8119 GIERLICH.MTTCHELL• INC. f4.963.20 PUMP PARTS
B SSQ«N�-- Ei34:80 SAP¢TY TEST
108451 GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION $3.000.00 STREET SWEEPING
l Oe R52 DON GREEN L ASSOCIATES f690.00 SURVEYING SERVICES US 86-72
fTl .D3 MECHANICAL PARTS
X 108454 FRED A. HARPER f1.995.0D DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
._., 1O0955 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 3667.43 GAUGE
CTI 1.64ub MATCH a RINK, . --EYT.T MCI" P"n
108457 S. A. HEALY CO. $192.048:19 CUMBTDUCTION PI-35-/
7�---II 108458 DONALD D. HONOMICHL 1 f300.OD OEFERRUD COUP DISTRIBUTION
m S1.417-1 BATTERIES
: I IOBR60 R.S. HUGHCS CO.. INC. f1.394.13 SAFETY SUPPLIES
W ' 100461 HUNTINGTON BEACH HAPDER STAMP 53.72 D`__ RUBBER STAI
'wg • SERVICES
108R63 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $131.591.66 FERRIC OBBLIGATOS M.0.11-08-89
1 OB064 INDUSTRIAL THREADED FRODUCTS $1.930.05 CONNECTORS
1494.58 JANIMPLAL SUPPLIES
_ /OR066 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $103.45 WATER USBAGE
108467 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. f598.52 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
TT.3F'— ELECTRlc PARTS
108169 KALLEEN•S COMPUTER SUPPLIES $070.21 PAINT SUPPLIES
100470 KAMAN BEARINGS L SUPPLY i531.39 SITTINGS
•531. CONSTRUCTION 5-34-2
108972 KEN.S• •OIL. INC. f102.5C WASTE OIL DISPOSAL
W1 108473 KING BEARING, INC. i9.117.71 __ MACHINE SUPPLIES____
--ISL O.PO PURC9A51NC CONSULTM
108475 MARTIN KORDICK. SP $2.804.40 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 14-1-I11 '
108476 LEEDS L NORTHRUP $930.69 _ IBSTRUIleN1'
ASSOC. ENGINEERING SERVICES - GEOTECBNICAL INSPECTION
µ 1UP470 LEWCO ELECTRIC CO. S97.IE RADIO
108479 K.P. LINDSTROM, INC. 52.261.58 MASTER PLAN SERVICES M.O.I0-14-90
DBTbI�—A63 --"----" —._—..—_.eeoTocRAeelc seavlces
108983 MALCOLM PIRATE • INC. $4.104.57 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.O.7-12-69
FUND 9199 - JT UIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/26/90 PAGE 9
REPORT NUMBER AP/3
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
Z 8TDI7�65S71At-6AYY 08/02/90
2
WARRANT' NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
,
, 20048 M11ARVAC ELECTRONICS f189.64 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
ICeA83 MATT - CMLORr INC. _ $899.06 _ CHLORINATION PARTS
+ ON M UR p -fir 050.00 CONSULTING - OCEAN 9'[OD1
1089B5 MAXWELL COLORS f18.30 PHOTO DEVELOPING
1089 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. $426.65 TOOLS
9 A IC M M $ MILEAGE EXPENSE
1BR988 TIES COMPANY $13.740.51 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
108989 MICRO MOTION f379.17 METER REPAIR
90 KOAGL-CONFUTER S Bch---- 5 - cmreorea Aae soMAKE -
108491 MILLTRONICS $2.258.05 INSTRUMENT
+ 108492 MOORE 8 TABER f21,350.00 EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIRS DIST 7
8 9 MOTION INOUSYRICSO INC. 5129.1il MECWNICAL PARTS
108494 MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICES 5102.29 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES
108495 MULTIWIRE DIVISION ___ $576.30 _ _REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT _
FICS496
Er'-IW.97 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $121.13 LOBE OIL17l GUST M. NEWBERG CONEY. CO. f1,923.697.20 CONSTRUCTION PI-33
X f 0. INSTRUMENT PART
00 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 27.BB HATER USPAGB
01 NORTH SUPPLY $117.56 TELEPHONE PARTLCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES ----�TSi.Y7saiZTY GLASseS
B3 OX SYSTEMS CO. $28,583.83 CHLORINE M.0.2-16-90
1085U0 ORANGE BEARING, INC. i1B0.16 MECHANICAL PARTS
OXYGENSPECIALTY GASES
108506 CSOOC SELF-FUNDED MEDICAL INS f150.000.00 PREMIUM ADVANCE
100507 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 32.196.01 EXTREME WORKERS COMP INSURANCE
�2I7T9--- PIT!@ PARTS
108509 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. 5331.29 SAFETY SUPPLIES
100510 PACIFIC BELL $654.63 TELEPHONE
L S67.62 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE
+ IOE512 PAX WEST i734.40 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
108513 PARTS UNLIMITED $1.750.33 VEHICLE PARTS
j -5' 61-- CYLISDER EjApAIRE
b• TSB 515 PEAT. MARWICK. NAIN A CO. $5,000.00 AUDITING SERVICES M.0.3-9-88
108516 ROT PEMER DGRAF1 34A5.00 DEFERRED) C0MP DISTRIBUTION
q IRA YST MS. DEFERRED)INC. SLUDGE RPMIOVAL H.D.$-11-88
106518 PIINEV, HOWLS $172.13 POSTAGE METER RENTAL
N 108519 POLYPUPE, INC. f38.R69.49 POLYMERS M.0.1-IG-9D•8-9-89 _
LAB SUPPLIES
P• 108521 POWER ELECTED SUPPLY CO. 9158.70 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
ML 108522 POWEP SYSTEMS $163.13 ENGINE PARTS
1 1UR523 MAROLD PRIMROSE ICE SI!2:11 ICE
•� 100529 THE PPGJCCTS SOLUTION F.O. fi.59 01 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O.8-10-88
N,+) 108525 PEP WINE SHOES .157.21_ SAFETY SHOES
1085 •E.0.1. _.
- 209527 REDI CYPRESS 890.00 DELIVERY CRANES -
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/26/90 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER. AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID .97417IF —PitsTINO-OATS-66
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
108528 P.A. REED ELECTRIC SS.145.32 PUMPS
108529 REPEOY TEMP 52.637.83 TEMPORARY SERVICES
a - -- S1571IFM88TINC R1321i58 --
108531 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. S2.135.15 GAUGE -
108532 J. R. ROBERTS CORP. S104.747.52 CONSTRUCTION J-7-4
—7UB CONSTRUCTION J-17
108534 J. R. ROBERTS $158.397.14 CONSTRUCTION 3-20
108535 POSEP.OUNT/UNILOC S1.562.95 INSTRUMENT PART
CLAFDA ER --.
108537 SANCON ENGINEERING • INC. $184.410.00 CONSTRUCTION 3-33R
208538 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $463.76 ELECTRIC MOTOR
P ------WRIT.IT— ENGINEERING SERVICES DIST S 14,647
108546 SCHULER ENGINEERING CORP. $227.539.76 CONSTRUCTION PI-27-162
208541 SEA COAST DESIGNS - SLO8.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES
997STmOLS
108543 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1,373.55 TOOL
108544 SLIDE MASTER $114.75 PRPSEHYATION AIDS
SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89
m 108546 SOFT WAREHOUSE• $149.74 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
X 108547 SOLAR TURBINES INC. $2.334.31 TURBINE REPAIR
2
8 OPERATING TEES
Cd 105 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY f1 . 0 SOURCE TEST '
106550 50 SOUTH COAST WATER .IS$251.5 POUIPlO'M RENTAL
� lIIA55�400'I'PLRA'CAL7i:EOTSdWCO* f5 ii5JI ppyER
CO 108552 SO. CAL. GAS CO. S262.67 NATURAL CAS
1 108553 SO. CALIF. WATER CO. 2102.50 WATER USBAGE
. . SI7i193B�SEL FUEL
108555 - SPACE SAVER SYSTEMS.
INC.• $6.490.52 PILING SYSTEM PARTS
108556 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $1.782.01 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS
10855, STAMEN Z. SPASSOttt F,L, S4.jsl.ua ENGINEERING SERVICES J-20,PI-34-1
106558 WESTALLOY INC. $39.12 WELDING SUPPLIES
108555 STAR TOOL A SUPPLY CO. $1.157.26 TOOLS
0 3.Ta .IF-- STEEL
109561 SUN-BELT LANDSCAPE S NAINT. $3,847.00 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.8-9-69
108562 SUNSET FORD S112.67 TRUCK PARTS
H31TJANITORIAL SUPPLIES
108564 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL. INC. 93.529.60 TOOLS
IDE565 SWEETLAND CO. $377.55 FITTINGS_ _
"---T08 L -711C- ------ --[73T04 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
108567 TCH ASSOCIATES $752.38 LAB SUPPLIES
108568 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD S5.057.52 VAR LEASES
PUBLICATION
100570 TONY-S LOCK 6 SAFE SERVICE $72.19 KEYS
1U8571 TRAVEL TRAVEL $656.60 TRAVEL SERVICES
AUTfl'2:7"6 - mum PARTS
108573 J.G. TUCKER a SON. INC. S2.142.91 INSTRUMENT PARTS
FUND( 9119 JT OIS7 WOPNINF CAFIT4L PROCESSING DATE 7/26/90 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER 043
COUNTY SANITA710M DISTRICTS OF ORANCE COUNTY
A ns R6f6"6S7L3T4�'63STiAb-b eYf-'ES76E 9
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
108574 TWINING LABORATORIES OF $5.204.25 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89
108575 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 579.00 PARCEL SERVICES
8576 UNITED PUMPING SERVICE R324.50 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICE
108577 VMS (VISUAL ROMT. SYSTEMS) S1.003.12 INSTRUMENT REPAIR
108578 VWF SCIENTIFIC 13,115.98 LAS SUPPLIES
.--rum- VALIN CORPORATION 151,.l MECHANICAL PARTS
IOBBBO VALLEY C171CS SUPFLY CO. $6.057.13 FITTINGS
108581 CARL WARREN C CO. $074.61 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADHINISTRATOR
P E—CURTM79 Y ♦ .�tl CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-9-89
I O8583 WOODRIDGE PRESS $20.953.56 BROCKURB
1065 a ROURKE A WOODRUFF 644.539.D0 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.6-14-8
}E 0} CORP. S3♦ 6. COPIER LEASES
1 + 108586 GEORGE YARDLEY COMPANY 9151.96 VALVE
10P.5P.7 21EBARTH AND ALPER S871.549.DS CONSTRUCTION P2-37
TS 5260:D 6----- DBF/BRBD COIN• DISTRIBUTION
-----------------
m .
x
..
W SUMMIAllyA760RT—
/I OPER FUND 6 34.77
02 CAP PAC FUND 64.359.22
03 OPER I= 216.850.54
u.5u---
i5 CAP PAC FUNK 600,858.19
/6 OPER RAND 98.00
1. CAP FAC FUNK 732.36
07 OPER FORD 24.287.14
07 CAP FAC FUND 173.209.64
oPR ER 37:06—'
014 OPER FUND 966.00
/14 CAP FAC FUND 126.876.12
6 UPeR EUND .b99.8
N' 1667 OPER FUND 3.589.59
M /7614 OPER FOND 5.362.92
6 it"bRff-FUN
G; CGRF 7,678,772.93
SFI/WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FUNDS 196,040.66 _
lT 110PKING CAPITAL PUNO T�Tbb.56
J $ 10,546,992.16
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8109/90 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
______—_-2AURILSARLLAII9N�I3.IA1LI5_.QP .DR ANOE_COUNiT__
CLAIMS PAID 08/15/90 POSTING DATE PS/15/90
WARRANT NO, VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
308614 HAD SYSTEMS $379.44 INSTRUMENT PART
10p_633_ ASP ANp LY.S1S 339Q.DS_._._ _.. PUNE 4SBMTIDq_ANµYBIB—__
_ 106616 AT 6 T 3968.3E LONG DISTANCE TELEFINUE SERVICE
_ 108617 ACCV - SLUDGE 3499.11 LAB SUPPLIES
IQOGlf—_—.LINCQLN_CANP.EI3_4J11LER1oRs 37co.1� IfLE_BEPdIRB
_ ]Ob619 AIR ACCESSORIES CO. s203.06 COMPRESSOR PARTS
108620 ALPHAGA2 31.019.8E INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
ROSCO INC.,. L/OR__NMEPICPI".L&S _ s5.4T9.9T,. __. MACgLRE_SU7PLIES _—__._
_ 108622 AMERICAN IECMNICAL SUPPLY $541.97 CAMERAS
_ 108623 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $3,796.58 ROAD REPAIRS ➢IST 7
_ I0¢624 @LAKEP,ANDERSON tT6B.99 I�ETIBG�ENSB
_ 206625 AMMER - WIRE L CABLE $149.30 CABLE
20b626. ANTMONYrS MECH. 6 MACHINE, INC $322.00 MECHANICAL PARTS
' _._1OP627___.._.._._A-PLUS. STS.TEp3__.__..__.._ S2.497r72-__. - ._.._ ___ .NOTICb"_ADS___—__._
108628 APPLE ONE 6890.96 TEMPORARY SERVICES
108629 ARATEI SERVICES. INC. $B.925.49 UNIFORM RENTALS
m ' 111130 __AR1209AJRSf1UBENT 34.975.11p__ ._ IHSTRUBEIII'_BRAIR
X _ 100631 AU70 SHOP EOUIPMENT CO. $266.95 TRUCK PARTS
2 ID8632 8 t T HYDRAULICS S1.127.83 PUMP PARTS
tz __ 1OB633_...... ..FALCON_DISPOSAL_SERVICE — 9179•930.08.._ . ... _ CRIT_RBIIQVAL_ILO.icq-80.___.__
208634 P.V. RAROTTI AND ASSOC. $6,562.50 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES P1-34-2.P2-37
—I 178635 BAITER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS 32r051.36 LAB SUPPLIES
1D8637 ROBERTDAIL , BEIll N.WILLHS_ 22,383.91_ OFFICE SUPPLIES
f"1 _ 108638 ROBER7 BEI DATIL LAIN FROST t AS $22.3E3.35 ENGINEERING
DI DISK
3-33.5-3I
10863E BOLTRONIS DATA MAINTENANCE S190.00 COMPUTER DISK MAINTENANCE
_108639____...._.. ..BRN-A-RUES.__.___.. _ 3T1.56..__ _.. ._ IRUC_R_PA11T9 ARTS _
108641 BROOKS INSTRUMENT
L ASSOC..ASSOC INC. .157.24 COMPRESSOR W PARTS
IOB691 BP00N5 IN STPU MINT DIY. 31.15T.24 CBLORIN6 WATER.
1Rf132 BRDWN-E._CALOYELL 32.734.Po ____ uR_SEBYICeS _
_ 108643 BUREAU OF BUSINESS FPICTICE $1,418.40 PUBLICATION
108644 GARY G. STREED S1,769.50 PETTY CASE REIMBURSEMENT
_ 108645.. _..___.CS COMPANY ._...._._._ ..___— 3222.I6 _ _ _ _. _ VALVE____._
108646 CAL-FAC CHEMICAL CO., INC. $186.90 CREMICALS
10b647 CALTROL . INC. s1.024.97 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
b MER.ICIR..SJGMA __ 3a.1p p,,5@_, _,_,___-_ __LAB_&UPPRES
108649 CHRISTINE T. CAPP ST28.OP COMPUTER INPUT SERVICES
1U8650 CHARLES W. CARTER CO. 9657.19 HYDRAULIC CYLINDER
106651 _ . .. CENTURY PAINT __. ._._ ..._._. ..._.____._—.., f173.06 . .__- PAINT SUPPLIES__
108652 CENTURY SAFETY INST. A SUPF. 3628.68 SAFETY SUPPLIES
IOR653 CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC. $3,092.95 UNLEADED GASOLINE
_—_108653....__...... . CHEVR➢N..W.$.A....1 EC.___._ —__1ZA3B4.91_...._.. ...__ _. —.. . REFUND.USER.PEE OVEPPAYlENi'
108655 CHROME CRANKSHAFT, INC. 9260.00 IECRANICAL PART
10B656 CHURCH ENGINEERING, INC. S89.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-13
.. LCbL57. . ... COAST AUTDMATIC. TRANSMISSION._. _._____--_..f393.BU _ . _ ... . TRUCK PARTS
108650 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $1.160.25 FIRE EXTINGUISHERS
100659 COILS UNLIMITED $451.56 ELECTRIC PARTS
FUN 9199 - JT DIST WORNINF CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/00/90 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
rmM.Y_S1NITkTIQN.31STR CTx OF ORANGE_LDUMTV
CLAIMS PAID 06/15/90 POSTING DATE 08/15/90 -
ry uenxexi Np`__ _ _¢ENpyR eN11NNT DESCRIPTION
108660 COLICH AND SONS $90,203.35 CONSTRUCTION 2-11-3
_208OMPUTE._AUTOMATION
NC• __ af.sOaD8_.. .. REFUND
FEE
OVERPAYMENT
108663 COMPUTER AUTOMATION $904.19 BROCRI U5" PEE OVBRPATlfl01'l
- 108663 CONLRD•$ PHOTOGRAPHY y900.19 B0.0C8URE ABTNOPA
108665 _CONSOLIDATED .ELEIBI_ALY- aS2.56_____ SHUCC_ C SUPPLIES
Intl665 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. t11.$92.36 FREIGHT SVPPLIEB
1 Otl666 CONSOLIDATED FCHEMICALYS i9..36 FREIGHT
-__...38666 CONTIINER NENTALEC.CHEMICAL
COOtso nia ______y51.5Ip.B8_, ._ __„ _. ._ 'IOEIClMASTT DISPOS.10-11AL-_...__ .. _
- 106669 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL C $9.903.15 CELUBINS M.0.10-11-89
- 108669 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS i9.9B1.15 BOD9S_IRIINC
l:8171 COSTA.rESA AU BookTOS FTnxr tf Fi_e0 __ _TRICE
4c. 108671 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY S234.01 TRUCK PARSE
108672 COUNTS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC i1F396.12 BL¢CTRIC SUPPLIES
=--1•8673-_._....._ CHMISTATE 0CETS ORS.LERTON _ a $495.90 .__. _____._. .. .._ .REGIJAINSTRTAT
ATI
14667. CAL STATE UNIV.SE FULLER TON $870.19 TICISTBATION
I Otl675 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE iS70.19 TIRES
RI iOfl6Ta _ ._DECO______ .4.9-4. _.ELBCTRLC.Sfmw.IEs
X 108677 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $42.50 BUSINESS CARDS
_ 10N67e DONALD CALLENDAR FAMILY TRUST $83.34 REFUND USER FEE OVIRFAYRUNT
l7y --__.1L efi T9_.._..._. DUNN_EOWAROS_CORP..____ 19.221151..._ _..._ __...... PAINT SUPPLIES_
108680 EASTMAN9 INC. $1.419.98 OFFICE SUPPLIES
1= 108681 ECOANALYSIS. INC. $327.52 OCEAN MONITORING
f"1 1DR492 EDUCLTISNAL_OEVELDEHENT SEE'_ of a.xee.O,p__, CONTRIBUTION --IOUTR RAVC1Tinx FRotaa
1 - 108683 EGGHEAD UNIVERSITY $194.06 REGISTRATION
TJ _ 108604 ENCHANTER. INC. y5S0.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.3-14-90
- ----108685__-.. ____ JOHN-B.. FALRENSTLIN.-F-E.._ aR_en A.6p_„-_._ __. _- --_CONSTRUCTION-nRVICER Jr7_A...Je20.J-17
108606 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. - $62.25 AIR FREIGHT
108687 FEARELLGAS $12.48 PROPANE
1pfl68n _..CNEHWES1._JNL._ aR•nR7.00 _ .— NFr.AHtrAI BUEELIEn
106689 FILTER SUPPLY CO. t157.l0 CHLORINATION PARTS
108690 FISCHER L PORTER CO. 97.065.13 CHLORINATION PARTS
FISHER SCIENTIEIC_CO. 1129.25. .. ..... LAB SUPPLIES—'_
208692 FLAT A VERTICAL CONCRETE $136.25 CONCRETE CUTTING
I08693 FLUID TECH $418.46 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
.____-108690--__-F..LUORAMSCS.-IJiC au1.22- .. .._-.__. ._--_H¢CBAHICAt.JUMPLIES
108695 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA t297.35 FILM
108696 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $9.136.14 WATER USEAGE
... . 109697 _. FOX ENTERPRISES . .. ..1......... _.-11.825.00 _ SAFE CONSULTANT
108698 THE FONRORO COMPANY $98.43 CHARTS
IDA699 CITY OF FULLERTON $143.30 WATER USEACE
GANAHL.LUMBER..Co. HARDWARE/LUMBER _____.__—.__.._�_
108701 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $73.59 TELEPHONE SERVICE
IDUTOP GE09GE LEECH L ASSOCIATES L1.296.65 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
108703 ... HARBOUR ENGINEERING 1.. 15.387.50 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES _ ..........
108704 HATCH i KIRK. INC. __� -_ -- $449.61 ENGINE PARTS
108705 HILTI. INC, $690.73 HARDWARE
.J
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/08/9P PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANTT ATTON DISTRICTS OF DRANK. 000NTI_ __
CLAIMS PAID 08/15/90 POSTING DATE 08/15/90
YAIIRANT_NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
IOP706 HOERBIGER C.Y.S. CALIF. • INC. 3457.2E MECHANICAL PARTS
---�T'e20Z_—�oUS E_oF 1a LT€IJES_ $1.573All---- _-.—__BATTERIES- --
_ 108788 R.S. HUGMES CO.. INC.. S1.614.49 PAINT SUPPLIES
_ 108709 IND INDUSTRIES $3.129.00 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
108710 ISCO.-INC. s6T.00 PAB_RUPPLIES
1Qb7ll I.S.I. WEST $1,104.96 INSTRUMENT
106712 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $56,965.09 FERRIC/FERRDuS CHLORIDE M.O.II-05-89
J05'j13___- INOUS7R106 .THASARED__PFODIAPIS $1,102,15_._.. . .__.-._-_CONNECTORS_______ _
208714 INGRAM PAPER S2.146.01 JAITITORIAL SUPPLIES
_ 108115 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $129.52 WATER USPAGB
_ 1 12 LAM SUPPLIES
106717 JAYS CATERING $134.75 MEETING MUSE
106710 JOE•S WATER TRUCES $576.06 PATER TRUCK RFNLAL DIST 5
_.-.__..1.04722 __JQNNSTONC SUPPLY-_ S3iB.22.___ _---ELECTRIC_SUPPLIBS-
_. 108720 THE KEITH COMPANIES $1,236.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-3365-36
108721 KING BEARING, INC. SSS2.1B MACHINE SUPPLIES
208722 NEL_KOENEL__ 1517.5D A TIEMP Y SERVICES
X 206723 P.ARTIN KORDICK♦ SR 32.322.20 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 5-35-1
2 108724 LAN SUPPORT GROUP $254.00 BINDING SERVICES
10P MS._ _..LASER SURP.LIES_.6_SERYICL 1]fi3.1fiS__ ... .__-.—PRINT SUPPLIES__
a II8726 LAUNDERLAND S57.14 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT
108727 LTEBERT CORPORATION $129.63 ELBMIC EQMPUBI7T
16872A _JL.ElLimas BNN. 1N0. 32.349.50 WASTER PLAN RIR - CONS TING
C1 106729 LORAIN PRODUCTS $1.254.29 RELIANCE POWER MAINTENANCE
1 108730 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 92 3131.376.00 POOLED MSSONS ESTIMATING PROGRAM
w _._.100731_______. MAC APPLIED.ENYIRONALMTAL 12.f 22.B1.. ____---_-_LAB SERVICES
106732 MOT BIOLOGIC COMPANY S393.07 LAB SUPPLIES
308733 HAS $232.18 FHOTUCBAPBIC SERVICES
l ReI3S MACOKCD_-_. 1265.SI_.- seMVTrF AGR.RRSMT _
1OE735 MARINE S VALVE SUPPLY $144.93 VALVE
108736 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $60.53 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
.-308737_____.____ MCBAIN INSTRUMENTS-. _...__ S32A.00_ _._.__-_.-
108738 MCKASTER•CARR SUPPLY CO. S676.99 SAFETI SUPPLIES
108739 MEASUREMENT CONTROL SYS. INC. 91,906.93 BEARINGS
MEOLIN_CONROLSSO—__ 137Bd5—__ .PL@OING..SuEPLTRs
IBP741 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO. 34.134.7E SAFETY SUPPLIES
109742 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. 3167.8E PUBLICATION
..106743. _. - MONI7OR PUBLISHING. CO.. -_____. _ ____4330.00 ____ _ ____ SUBSCRIPTION_____-_. _._
108744 MON76OPERY LABORATORIES S1.601.25 LAB SERVICES
108745 MOTOROLA. INC. 3358.26 RA010 PAM
_ 111B736 -...NATIONAL GOVERNOR!LASSOC.__ _ 315.00. __ _.__- -_PIIDLICATIOE__
108747 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES. INC. $1,722.50 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
308740 NORTH SUPPLY 655.24 TELEPHONE BELL
._. . 338749 _.. -. .... OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES-__.___ ._ ___3232.66 _ .. -.. .... .. _SAFETY GLASSES__._.___.._________-_.---.
10875E DX SYSTEMS CO. S52.257.91 C TOLD RINE M.0.2-14-90
100751 CYNTHIA O•NEIL $50.64 MILEAGE MERGE
FUNf 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE M/OH/9C PAGE 9
• REPORT NUMBER AP43
aI NIIAT IDTL.OLSTRTria DF_DRANGL-COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID B8/IS/90 POSTING DATE 08/15/90
rl Nr HD,_. _._VENDHR AMOUNT nE SC0.1PT70N
SOR752 OPEPATION TECHNOLOGY INC. 51.062.50 SERVICE AGREEMENT
118753_.._. .____GRANDE.BEARING.-IFIC 13.A714,9_._ __._____ HOC ICALPA.IS _
10875a ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $540.75 TRUCE PARTS
'0 108755 ORANGE COUNTY INDUSTRIAL $2.976.56 FIBERGLASS
IQfllSf_____ORAN6E_VALV.E_L-EllI1NG en_ s1.R1s_pD._— PiTTINGs
100757 OXYGEN SERVICE $2.166.97 SPECIALTY GASES
106758 COUNTY OF ORANGE f302.40 MAPPING SERVICES
.--_ .._108759.._.. . . ORANGE COUNT.Y_MARSMALL__.__ --._._IR23..26__.-__ ___.__-_P/RD®__CBAVEZ_._.____.
108760 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT f8.196.06 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE
100761 PR WEST ENTERPRISES 566.15 LAMMINATION SHEETS
I.A711 c,f1LIr PA9 r9 tl-ne9_H6 7E STRnNPNT {A9Ta IGP763 FACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $2.766.23 SAFETY SUPPLIES
108764 PACIFIC SEWER MAINTENANCE CORP $4,321.80 SEWER ROOT CONTROL TREATMENT DIST 7
PACIFIL.BELL__ .- 110.23_..
108766 PACIFIC BELL S21d95.22 REPAIR PAC. BELL EQUIPMENT
108767 PARTS ENGINEERING COMPANY 5252.39 COMPRESSOR PARTS
m _SGLTHB_ -PART. UNLS.NSIED_____ if 99_6IL_. TMVCIt DAVTR
x_ 108769 F1NA 'SRO SYSTEMS. INC. $45.201.55 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.D.5-I1-88
2= 106770 PLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE $67.39 HARDWARE
101171._._ ._. POLTPURE._INC. . Ed.. ... . ..._. .___..._.._...POLYJffH311.0.1d0e90.fl-9-39__-
300772 PORTER BOILER SERVICE, INC. ST76.08 ELECTRIC PART
10ST73 POWER TRACK, INC. $78.35 HOSE
f0BITA _28EH1NILEDYHELI1H6.2HTur _1100.9e npEIrv_o.QVIPIBNT RnverRa
("t 108775 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $199.00 ICE
1 IOR776 PROFESSIONAL PUBLICATIONS. INC $73.53 PUBLICATION
r. .THE.PROJECTS..SOLUII1Ma_C0.___._ _ .D6.. .108777__-....... AA.A5R _ _____ METERQ�II'ATIOM.INSPECPNVIJL0.Be10-BB_ _
108779 PULS AINC.EP $90.71 COMPUTER
l OP7T9 Rohs.UAL INC. i13.000.89 COMPPCER SUPPLIES/PRINTER
---_1➢8781 .__.RADIOL GICAL1 TRAINING
.150roa, EQUIPMENT
Q PMEN r9a
108782 RADIOLOGICAL TALI NINE SERVICES .056.61 RENTAL INVREMOVA
a
10678E RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. f1.050.60 PRINT BIN REMOVAL
-. 108783. _. _.._..._ R.D. STS TENS. INC.. _. ._.. . ..._._._.__._ 1159.60... _. ....._. .....___- ._BLOCK
208705 RECYC. INC. f67.$39.00 LAID SUPPLIES
REMOVAL N.0.2-10-30
I OB 7B5 REDI EXPRESS TER f39.00 LAB SU -fi AD
._. 08786._._...__..REMEREGISTER.__._.._.__— $619.5fl.__.__—_TEMPORS_A mC
1087P7 REMEDY TEMP 5619.99 TElBOMMR SERVIC66
168789 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. $555.38 CONNECTORS
-- 168790 _. _ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL _ _. _ _____..___.._ $357.92 _ _ INSTRUMENT PART__-_____.__.______._...._.
168790 ROSEMOUNTILMILOCIRSO 5557.0E STEEL
• 1G8791 JOSH WE T. RYCRSON t BON. INC. $956.13 STEEL
_.SEC AN WEST. . .. ...__.... ._. ._.. ___._._. $326.f1. ..
108793 SARTA ANA ELECTRIC NO700.S 5326.61 RLGCTRIG MOTOR PUTS
10879A SONGS-ROC 3375.00 REGISTRATION
108795. . DOUGSCIENCE
BARVIB .._____..___.250.27 ._ _ .__ OCEANREGIS MONITORING..._ __ .____. _..._._......
_.
200797 SCOTT S APPLICATIONSOSS 1NTNC t92.283.2T OCEAN LTYIGASES H.0.6-13-90
IP8797 SC OTT SPECIALTY CASES. INC 3917.99 SPECIALTY GASES
t
FUND NO 9159 - JT GIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/98/90 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
.__—_COUNIL S6NIIAIIWN__DISTRICTS OF ORANGE, COUNTY . _
CLAIMS PAID 08/15/90 POSTING DATE 08/15/90
+! WARRANT NO, VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
_ 108798 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS* INC, $930.00 LAB SUPPLIES
IPO.L_— __.._SE>_CQo_ST_DESL@N; fA62<19 ___OmCR_PDRffETVA
108800 CITY DF SEAL BEACH $210.50 WATER USSAOS
_ IeB801 SE70M NAME PLATE CORP. $811.66 TAGS
_ 1DB 802 _SNAMBQSK_SUPPLY— S487.05 _____._____TUQLS
_ IDAR03 SHEPHERD MACHINERY CO. 6629.76 TRUCK PARTS
108804 SMITH-EMERY CO. S1.126.50 SOIL TESTING H.0.6-14-89
SOFT_WeR9HQUSE_ f41.75.____
108006 SOLAR TURBINES INC. S311.92 FREIGHT
_ IoBB07 SO. COAST AIR QUALITY $5.553.00 PERMIT FEES
_108808 SQUALSDAII-HATER 197.06__ .RENIAL_EQBI@ff,1fL
_ 108809 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. $17.943.67 POWER
108810 SO. CAL. GAS CO. - S3.336.40 ILITDIW. GAS
_.__.108812 .. SOUTHERN COUNTIES
TI_.QA3._LD.__ 32D.192.63__ -- _______,-- _ DIESEL F_ELPLACE218N'T___
IDBBI2 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. i$4.000.04 ENGINE PING
108813 STAMEN 2. SPA SSOFF. P.E. 31.800.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-34-1.J-19-1.1-15
_ I OeRle WE3TALLSIL1N" 1509.Z0 _.NELBIw._wPLIPS
FTl X 1e8815 STAR 700L S SUPPLY CO. $975.63 TOOLS
-
100816 SUMMIT STEEL f3.598.90 STEEL
r-+ ____108817__ ._._SUNSET-FORD-- _ 3711.94....
100018 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL. INC. $6.033.35 TOOLS
�- 108019 SWEETLAND CO. $762.84 FITTINGS
IOe020 TAILORL-DUNN_ v90.o6 mum PARTS
Cl=' 108821 THA/NOPCAL $228.00 LAB SERVICES
_ 108822 TOTAL TECHNICAL SERVICES 3714.50 CONTRACT SERVICES PI-34-2
loaB23 .___ SReFFIC_CQN7ROL_SFAVIrJ[._1Ilt� 93A"7 -____ —TRUQK.PARTS
108824 TRAVEL TRAVEL $1.978.00 TEAM SERVICES
_ 160825 H.O. TRERICE CO. $695.66 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
IBSR26 _IRULRIAUIG_SUEELV, IN,- f4.3Rc.be TRIrcK eAflrS
108027 J.G. TUCKER S SON. INC. $1.949.07 INSTRUMENNT PARTS
108828 U.S. AUTO CLASS CENTER.INC. S198.00 TRUCK PARTS
__._118829_._..... U.S. WATER NEWS._ __..__ __._._____. 91R.S6_.. SUBSCRIPTION_._._
108830 UNOCAL S278.71 BR MEN GASOLINE
106631 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $143.92 PARCEL SERVICES
_. 186832 _.VVP..SCIENIIELC___-_ 19"111.13 ___--. __LAB.SUPTLdP3_
IOeR13 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. 93.802.61 FITTINGS
108834 VAMEC DIVISION 5196.211 INSTRUMENT REPAIR
.. _. _.-1Qb835 .__. . . . C. A. VARNER CO., IMC. _—__-.._. 1395•I6._ _ _ BQII.DING.MATERIALS_.__
_ 108836 VERTEX SISTERS $975.00 CONFUTER DATA SUPPORT
I08A3T VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY S515.33 SAFETY SUPPLIES
10,8838 _CARL_WARREIL 6_COa_____ 9221.11 ._INSURANCE_CLAUMAWIISTER
108839 WESTERN CORPORATE IMAGES $932.90 OFFICE EQUIPKNT
1O8e40 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY f33.814.48 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-9-89
UILLOAN ASSOCIATES — ___ s61A861.e T1_. _.—.._. ___.___ ENGINEERING SERVICES 1d6-2.2-77
108842 BOURKE R WOODRUFF 1152.625.73 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.6-4-89
1DSP43 WORDPERFECT CORP. S170.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
FUNC l._ 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/08190 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
rnDNT3-SANITATION DISTRICTS nE_OBANFE_COUDTY____._. _
�- .CLAIMS PAID OB/15/90 POSTING DATE 68/15/90
�I• w,RRANT Nn- yFypnR AMOUNTir
106899 PEROR CORP. A39696.75 COPIER 1.9ABER
BEOM6E_-TARDLERSDtlP.AMY_. .4Ba.1L_ ._—_ — __:—PA9L6lARYS_____ —
-----------------
.— IDLL_CLA.L eATo RR/IS/90 S1.PRR.IlY.B9__
SOGBARY AMOER2
92 OPER FUND 3.959.26
92 CAP PAC POND 163.059.38
.. 63 OPER wlm -
65 OPEN POND
217.36
65 CAP PAC FM 28.352.21
IA, AN
07 OPEN FUND 10.657.61 - -- --
_ = 07 CAP PAC FOND 5.491.43
" III OPEN FORD-------
-914 OPER FUIOI
47
�_- .92 91A CAP PAC PIRiD 15.216916.92
OPER
IR POND 6.92
n R
r I _ Ji OPE FUND 69I.506.67
Q7 CORF 160.397.13
BaLF_FT DEDWORINGRWCOUPIB$URABCpf_677.72__.__.—_...____._.__
JS DIST WORKING CAPIFAL ERER I2l.677.93 -
S 1.269.774.04
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING'DATE. 8/23/90 PAGE i
REPORT NUMBER APAD
CLAIMS PAID O8/29/90 POSTING DATE 08/29/90 ' .
108904 ABC PAINT STRIPING SERVICE $1.990.00 - PAINT SUPPLIES
' 108906 MAC
SYSTEMS iS79.0 ttl8T9EO0Nt. '>' •� i
108907 AT B T - $520.70 TESPRONB S�VICB
308909 ACTION-MARTIN $930.75 TOOL CREST'
108910 ADAMSON UNIFORM 6 EQUIP. S1.D98.69 LAB SUPPLIES
106912 AIR ACCESSORIES CO. $533.40 - CONJIMSOR PARTS
108913 AIR PRODUCTS A CHEMICAL INC. $15.296.00 DAN AGREEMENT! - OXYGEN CBNBBAROB STSTEN R.D.
208915 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 525.97 ASPHALT
108916 LEASING ASSOCIATES/ALLSTATE 2249.31 AUTOMOBILE LAUGHS
108910 ALPHAGAT $437.20 PROFAMB •'4:)/, i'e"i
X 108919 ROBCO INC. NOR AMERICAN SEALS $1.725.60 RAROWABE 1
= 108921 AMERITECH $97.75 COPIER LRASES °
W 108922 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION 95.500.00 SEWER man DIET 5 1
�.4 i
108921 ANIB TER - WIRE 8 CABLE .. B06Y.B7 COlRUfBI PAYyh i�M.f'ia '� Yy,�.1{ Ii3,91 ,�
pJ 10892E AN TH 0NV•S MECN. I MACHINE. INC 11.651.25 PUIR PAflffi q . 1"1�' °
TF.A
i--' 108927 AQUATIC CENTER $400.00 AIR CARDS
108928 ARATEA SERVICES. INC. 69.109.22 UNIFORM RENTALS
108930 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 5167.163.88 ORIT REEVAL 11.0 10-29-90L
1 OB 9]I BACKSTREET GALLERY � $119.21 71IA01I11 sulGAGBB
I08933 P.Y. BAROTTI AND ASSOC. $6.125.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PI-34-2.P2-37.P2-23-6
1O8934 B. BATEMAN SS85.E0 DElTRRE0 COMP DISTRIBUTION
I06936 BAWL ESS STATIONERS : $99.51 OFFICE BOPPLIBR'
° 108937 BEARINGS S DRIVES. INC. 51.010.9E
NOWARO_BLEVINS— -- -.. B
1U8939 DOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $152.00 RADIATOR REPAIR
108940 9ON-A-RUES 5515.D1 TRUCK PARTS
OaP- TSRI SS6 00 BBMSTR
1 OB 912 BROWN / CALDWELL $1.990.90 In, SERVICES
IOB913 STEVE BUBALO CONSTRUCTION CO. S191.390.22 CONSTRUMM 14-1-IB
R.._0IIeKE_1NOUSIRIAI-.CORP. SS3.'2L 22 SONSTRUBTIONd 26
198945 THE RURRE COMPANY 599.59 INSTRUMENT PART
10P946 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $561.57 ELECTRIC SUPPLIER
USN-ANO "O URVRV-9ERYEBB6ie9-0
I00918 GARY G. STREED $873.46 PETw CASH R6TNBOB851®71'
109949 BUTLER PAPER COMPANY 1221.53 OFFICE SUPPLIES
J
FUND 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE B/23/9C PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CLAIMS PAID 08/29/90 POSTING DATE 08/29/94
108950 CPT CORP. / SUMMIT SOLUTIONS S4.076.30 SERVICE AGREEKEN'TS
' -- 108952 CAL-GL.SS FOR RESEARCH. INC. 1317.69 L&B SUFPLIEI +{1 TiarN
108953 CAL-PAC CHEMICAL CD.. INC. /358.34
108955 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $318.900.62 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-36.P2-42.71-34
1OP956 CHRISTINE T. CARR 2650.00 COMPUTER INPUT SERVICES
' 108958 CENTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM $5.015.68 TELEPHONE ETSTEM MODIIMCATIOW7011,4''
108959 CHAMPION FENCE CO. S6.557.00 FENCING-` r •�_y `..82.`
208961 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT .56B.51 SAFETY SUPPLIES
' 308962 COAST INSURANCE AGENCY $651.00 INSURANCE
108964 COMPRESSOR CONPONENYS OF CALIF $1.486.25 SRAPT-;a, , 4, e
198965 CONARD'S PHOTOGRAPHY -- $223.13 PICTOGRAPHIC BHRINCE91
= 10896T CONSOLIOA TEO ELECTRICAL DIST. 59.026.59 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
_ 308968 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS 111.114.53 BLUEPRINTING
1OB970 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $2.511.54 _ ELECTRIC ROPPLIBB a - 'l
—11 208971 DAVID WILLIAM TRAPNELL $168.50 BROCHOBE SBHVIC88 f� ''"aIR
4'
O 108973 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE $7,20.31 TIRES
i
N 108979 TOM ppYES 138.58 MEETING EXPENSE
a
100976 DECO .*�, $3.06 ELECTRIC SDPPLI➢8
108977 DEZURIK AND/OR CS CO. .: S789.06 PLONKING SUPPLIES • ..�
IOE979 OUNKEL BROS. MACH MOVING $1 590.52 SPACE SERIAL. J-19L
I08980 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. 61:313.09 PAINT SUPPLIES
l BB9B2 W. H. EBERT CORP. $19.748.00 CONSTRUCTION S-3S-1 T('.u,
108903 ELECTRO-TEST. INC. 8975.00 ELECTRIC MALES r pp
NC"M.ER� IN, 4[.. M1.
IP8985 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. S551.00 LAB SAMPLES
l OR986 JOSEPH EVANS 110.000.DC DEFERRED COMP EMERGENCY N/D
VEI - M awe rje RDAD RASP
100988 DODGE CONSTRUCTION NEWS $114.00 ADVERTISING
108989 FACILITIES SUPPORT CO. - $577.74 ELECTRIC PARTS -
g9n MARS LL AIBRES-____ a-0
100991 JOHN B. FALKENSTEIN F.C. $3.602.90 COHSTBIMON SERVICES J-7-4. J-20.3-0
108992 FARR SALES 4 SERVICE 1906.38 ELECTRIC PARTS
E-9>-----------ZEDElAt
108994 FERRELLGAS $57.36 PROPANE -
I8b995 CNEMWEST. INC. $150.95 ELClUJIl L SUPPLIES
J
FUND NO R199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/23/9C PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CLAIMS PAID D8/29/90 POSTING DATE DS/29/90 rd�DP.+ �
• 100996 FISHER CONSTRUCTION CO. .SS50.00 PUBLICATION
. 108998 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA i19019.68 " CAMERA/FILM •r'Y�
i • 108999 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT f357.13 SAFETY IOPPL ' ,."x ��;1
p, O.enen r _ _a3_c.. n -IN6TI1N1@NT BBPP A
109001 C17Y OF FRESNO 5515.34 MEETING REIMBURSEMENT
109002 A.F. FREY $105.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
209004 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $7.412.60 '1'B1.EPEONE SERVICBB "
109005 GEOFON. INC. $6wTU.69 MOMERINC SBHVIC¢B DIET 3 x S`;�+ L _
109007 DON GREEK f ASSOCIATES $4.342.50 SURVEY SERVICES NEW 68-72
109008 HACH COMPANY $1,932.12 LAB SUPPLIES
109010 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $428.73 v pL01D1ING.p6gTe K 7:- `6
109021 HATCH S KIRK. INC. $2.002.82 IffCSANICAL-PARTS "�"{-" t r" - 'y
m
X 109013 MOULD INC. f130 . HARDWARE
109011 DO NASD D. MONONICHL $300.00 00 0¢PERR® COUP DIB]LID92ID•
R12109016 MOUSE OF BATTERIES SE1001.23 B6TleeI¢BIi1Ma2if;,ylr,,y}r yh +" r;
—f 109027 A.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. $315.25 PAINT 90PPLI0.0 - t Y. V }.•
C7 109019 HUNTINGTON SUPPLY $9.51 HARDWARE
W 109020 ING INDUSTRIES $1.119.10 INSTRUMENT PARTS
109022 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL 88S.791.13 PeRBOOR CBL08IDE tl 0.4-I1-9Q � �7 �. ,.
109023 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS 119201.24 CONNECIDRG':' • + {;`
R S3 262 11 d
109026 INSANE EMPIRE WEEKLY
CO. $1.$68.25 PUBLICATION
N@1TAL
-� 10902E INSIDE C.P.A. YEEkLY REPORT f58.25 PUBLICATION
109128 GREAT WESTERN SAMI7A0.Y 3YPP. f1(176.T0 JABITDRIAL'SOPPLIU
109029 JAY'S CAT ER - f819.56 MEETING EXPENSE
7 SISS 8
109C31 JOKE OFFICE PP ODUCTS SI72.13 OFFICE SUPPLIES
109032 KALLEEN•S COMPUTER SUPPLIES $849.25 OFFICE SUPPLING
63 FITTINGS
209034 KAMER COMPANY $1.353.20 TOOLS
109035 KELLY SERVICES $5.180.13 TEMPORARY SERVICES
6NKO.-INC.- • 2SS A0 90N6TRODEEDN 5 51 2
209037 KIMMERLE BROS.. INC. . $523.71 SEALS
IP9038 KING BEARING. INC. •'95,393.63 MACHINE SUPPLIES
a9a38 •'^K--W.DU3IRIAL-SUPPLIES s11a 65 HARDWARE I,
109040 MEL KOEHN $1.567.50 TEMPORARY SERVICES
109011 MARTIN kOg01CK. SR i3.021.95 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 3AS-1 •.yK.3� .,f.:,
new 7aai:`
FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/23190 PAGE t
REPORT NUMBER AP43
"UNIX SANIIATLON
OISIO'CIS
CLAIMS PAID 11/1901 'POSTING DATE 10129110
209042 L L C TIRE SERVICE S63.33 TRUCK PARTS
1090.4 LEE08 6 NORTHRUP 63;156.97 meta Rum PASTS v�
109015 LENCO ELECTRIC CO. - f1.0.S5 TDUCC PUTS
"Sla"s IS"
15
109007 JOHN LISEE PUMPS. INC. 33.722.65 PUMP PARTS
1090.8 LOCAL AGENCY $710.00 LAFCO FEE
109950 NPG $1.622.18 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES r ii7T
109051 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS. INC. $465.90 MECHANICAL PAHT6 I+°' t�+� *T1�•'-
209053 DUN MAURER f..000.00 OCEAN STUDY
109054 MAXWELL COLORS t16.32 PHOTO PROCESSING
109056 "CNE NNA EN6R. t EGDIP. 68t494.06 PUMP PARTB'`y
109057 "CHASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. 'tla.a BARDYARS
m
X 119I59 MEOLIN CONROLS CO. $90.58 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
„_..� 109060 TMOMAS P. MELT ON S266.37 MILEAGE MUSE
D
109062 XILLAR ELEVATOR SERVICE _ 472.66 ELEVATOR
^I l09063 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO. t331.IB &AFE1T SOPFLIU-
C7
]09065 M D11 T ROY SUPPLY CO. S91.56 BARDWARE
r 119066 MOTION INDUSTRIES. INC. S1.535.66 HARDWARE INC
109068 MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICES f97.71 CSLLUAE TE zpmcmq SSEY➢CII n ati It
109019 NATIONAL LUMBER f390.42 BABDOTT ITYABB V ✓'Y -- t Ytl ny {y(Y I?.�
109071 GUST M. NEVBER6 C011T. CO. f2.05.d63.62 CONSTRUCTION PI-33
119072 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $24.16 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
109074 O.M.S./SOLAG DISPOSAL CO f4.165.00 TRASH BINS
109075' DR SYSTEMS CO. t6B.721.93 CHLORINE M.O.2-14-90
IS9P77 ORANGE BEARING. INC. fB37.IS MECHANICAL PARTS
1.9078 ORANGE COAST HARDWOOD t $412.63 BUILDING MATERIALS
l0 nRANBF rn
109080 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. tl.896.02 CHEMICALS
109081 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY CO. $174.86 GROuD COVER
9➢H2 ORANGE_VALVE_►-E11T111G-" _ v6A1.17—. vT-1.
109083 OXYGEN SERVICE $903.76 SPECIALTY CASES
11908. COUNTY OF ORANGE 8450.0C NAPPING SERVICES
➢9MB5 rnuMTv cAXIIlILI 1-11111
109886 ROBERT L. CITRON $150.00 DEFER® COMP - PIm- Ell
109087 P.J. RADCLIFFE t SONS $280.00 CONSUTLING SERVICES -
J >
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9125/90 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
' CLAIMS PAID 08/29/90 POSTING DATE OA/29/90 �
° 109088 PSI S205.36 TRUCK PARTS
• 109090 PSSI - - 3273.55 TV SERVICRAl-
° 109091 - PACIFIC PARTS $1.167.50 INSTRUMENT'.PARTS
109093 PACIFIC BELL $677.59 TELEPHONE SERVICE
109094 PACIFIC TRUCK EQUIPMENT $206.81 TRUCK PART
u—K PARTS
' 109096 PEAT. MARWICK♦ MAIN S CO. $5,400.00 ADDITIRG SERVICES N.0.3-9 88 tZ 14 :
° 109097 ROY PENDERGRAFT $445.00 DEV68R GaP DI® STRIBUTION
109099 POLYPURE. INC. 923.701.44 POLYMERS N.0.1-10-90,E-9-89
109100 POWER ELECTED SUPPLY CO. 1541.82 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
Ing,n, GONE.
109102 POWER TRAIN INDUSTRIES ' 9727.69 SAFETY 6022LI88
109103 HANDED PRIMROSE ICE SIR 4.00 . ICE I
m
X ' 109105 PUBLIC TELEPHONE f240.BB TELEPHONE SYSTEM
109106 OPS. INC. $1.760.00 COMPUTER SUPPLIER yy,,
30910E REMEDY TEMP f2.E26.EBON
109209 REMOTE METER RESETTING SYSTEM j3.000.00 POSTAW*.fi 0'�5 5 °,�?••' f ' A d y,li'r
C7 ° 109111 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. 1862.28 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
I
109112 ROACH YATER TECHNOLOGY. INC. 1231.1E BOILER PARS
10911E J. R. ROBERTS S306.021.31 CONSTRUCHON J 11
109115 J. R. ROBERTS 619.015.6E CONSTRUCTION J 10 k .�:.,•" '�,� �:
109117 ROSEMOUNT/UNILOC 3217.57 INSTRUMENT GOTTLIEB
109118 MICHAEL ROIENGURT 61.116.44 MEETING EXPENSE
109120 SANCON ENGINEERING . INC. 9533.272.54 CONSTRUCTION 3-33R
109121 SCNUIER ENGINEERING CORP. 8273.611.44 CONSTRUCTION PI-27-162
EA-CO4$Z-DES4LNS ti34.51 BPPIGB-6BPP6ESs
109123 SEWER EQUIP. CO. OF AMERICA :169.91. MACHINE PARTS
10912E SHAMROCK SUPPLY 6388.92 TOOLS
0 PHYRICA6 EVAN;
109126 SLIDE MASTER $226.50 SLIDES
109127 SNITN K NERY CO. f2.510.00 SOIL TEST13C M.O.6-14-89 -
12. SM/ik-RIRE-L-SURV4.Yat-4DC 363.37 A}AREPNG-SOPP6E8.r
109129 SOFT YAREHOUSCI WESTERN REGION $349.56 COMPUTER SOFMME
309130 SOFT WAREHOUSE $116.76 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
L-�5=6R-7DRdINCS-1NCORROoATED 92 SDO O4 MAID76lIANGE-..GP.6611EdiT
109132 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. f419.715.91 POWER
109133 30. CAL. GAS CO. $1.334.27 NATURAL GAS .j„I
FUND( 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8123199 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER APR3
CLAIMS PAID 08/29/90 POSTING DATE OB/29/90WARRANT AMOUNT -
p`'
< ati
109134 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. 916.594.55 DIESEL FUEL.
109136 SPAR LING INSTRUMENT CO..INC. *242.30 Itl8T8U!®TPLLT '" 1W R Fk�.T,`
109137 STAMEN Z. SPASSOF F. P.E. i3.B10.80 ERCINgnm SERVICER PI-3A-2 d1R Y-n�-
OLD
109139 STAR TOOL A SUPPLY CO. 2167.72 TOOLS
mr
109140 STERLING ART $195.80 ART SUPPLIES
109142 SUN-BELT LANDSCAPE A MAINT. $3.847.00 - CONTRACT•OROOLLSKMENG M 0 B-9•B9 pf4i,
109143 SUNSET FORD $93.55 TBOCR PARTS p+y^A
109145 SUPER CHEM CORP $371.R7 CBPHICLLS
109146 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL. INC. $2.281.27 TOOLS
10919E TAUBER ELECTRONICS $470.05 EATTERI66i' •' �
109149 TAYLOR-OU NX 1139.02 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
!Tl ' 109151 THE O DORE RO BBINS FORD $5.057.52 RENTAL INIMPMENT
X ' 109152 TMA/NORCAL f096.00 LLL SERVICES
S �
C01 109159 TILL IN6NAST t$1,259.00 - C08SUMO SERVICES 1 RIDGE ANALYSI
109155 TONIPS LOCK 1 SAFE SERVICE f196.23 ME v M% 1
O 109157 TRUCK 1 AUTO SUPPLY. INC. $1.611.75 TRDCR PARTS
109158 TRUCKWAXE $327.25 MUM PARTS
Q q
109160 UNION 516N CO. f1B2.38 RICHE •!$fi q :'b d 4
109161 UNITED CONCRETE COMPANIES :- f161.70 CONCRBTR"'
109163 VYR SCIENTIFIC $3.632.67 LAB SUPPLIES
109164 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $7.728.66 PIPE 6 IITTINGS
109166 VAN LEEUVER PIPE 1 TUBE S823.68 PIPE
109167 VAREC DIVISION - $7.393.59 NZCEARIm PARTS
Etl ..13 TRUC REPAIRS -
109169 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $955.26 SAFETY SUPPLIES
109170 CARL WARREN A CO. $206.95 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR
I09172 YELLS FAR 60 GUARD SERVICE $2.320.81 SECURITT SERVICES
109173 YESTEflN 1TATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY S63.256.08 CAUSTIC SODA 11.0.8-8-89
LBU9LL15--COMET __ �6.31`-mot iMFB11'1f1D^
109175 WILCON IND. $153.41 INSTRUMENT PART
109176 YILLOAN ASSOCIATES 21.49B.97 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-24
1-177 ne
10917E K-TREE CO. 1119.38 COMPUTER. SOFTWARE R"
109IT9 XEROX CORP. $2.550.80 COPIER LEASES X
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/23/90 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CLAWS PAID 06/29/90 POSTING DATE 08/29/90
109104 GEORGE YARDLEY COMPANY $805.16 VALVES
' 1091B2 21ERARTR AND ALPER T572.009.15 CONSTROCTL08 P2-37 -= Z'II}T•1P t
1 ° 109183 RICHARD S. EDGAR $200.00 DEPRER® cola, 0I8T8IBO2IOR `
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID DB/29/90 59.I65.070.85
-----------------
'ky��{A4t
� 14
1/liRk�Y
AMOUNT
P1 CAP PAC FUND { 1.085.63 ¢y
02 CAP PAC PDND 2,221.65 ;i s,�' " "{ ;'"•r ,
c ! P3 OPER PIRG) 575.669.37
O
05 OPER FUND 5,721.55
05 CAP FAC FUND 244,631.26
04
P7 OPER FORD }W <
17 CAP PAC POND L355:04 l 9
50.998.69 '•r a r: .xr MPfAX,,'^.. ^ ;'.
F14 CAP PAC FUND
0566 OPER FIORD 2. B3.RD 142,46393
1667 OPER POND lat•.:..•. 32.30 "?a�i s v5'La�ir,yV+li x v� 3 ';
F7614 OPER FUND 31919.69 $, ,x ;
CORP 7.027,301.19
SELF FUNDED ROMIG CORP INSURANCE 12,791.2E
6 9,185,070.85
M.:
e
_a
9 �
RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1990 - 7 :30 P.M.
D
q
y
FUND NO 9199 _ JT UIST WURKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/12/90 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
PQWALT"ANITATION f.ISTRTCTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 47/18/90 POSTING DATE 07/18/98
NARRANT110a. ...__...__.., ..._.—.._..._...YF kO,P?__._--- . . .. _Ey-PPN.I_._. DESCRIPTION
1UP317 WATERMA14 SUPPLY S39R.44 .CHAIN
.._..__...1 ...... _._..4K LP._Qll..CQ.—_..,_....._._.-. _..$24.119 3RR PEE OVERPAYIDSNT _.
: 108319 WESTLRN PACIFIC EDUTPFENT CO. $451.84 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
3>• 158320 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY $37,536.37 CAUSTIC SODA M.O. 8-9-89
m. .. __208321.,. . . .. . .WESC O..___... .... ._.. ...._._..__.. .. .___--.._..____..._.__..£296•BS— _EGEDTBIE PART _
I0A322 FEPOY CORE . $7.292.36 COPIER LEASES
p 1s0323 GEORGE YARDLEY COMPANY S397.30 VALVE PARTS
3a. ..,_. ..1.0329.._.... .. .:.._EVERET.T_.H._YJIRK�G..._-.-.__...
108325 LUCY ZAHRAN, INC. 15,250.06 I/17 SACK-UP CLAIM
-----------------
m
TOTAL ELAiMS FAIL 17/IM/9U S6.5J4r535.51
OR _
I.
SUMMARY ._.._ .._. _.___....._-_.. ........._._-_. .......____.__ AMOUNT_.__ -.
3- 01_OPER FUND ._ .... .. .------ -----'�-- -- 750.00
CI ORES
FUND 1,012,054.41
87
- -
p /2 OPER FUND 12.056.87
/2 CAP PAC FUND 441.43 _
y 12 CONST FUND _. _ . _.._ _. _ .. ___.__._—________. .1,928,951.05
/3 OPER FUND 14.049.63
.Zl /3 CAP FAC FUND 2,045.74
/9 CONST FUND . . .... .. _. .. . . _--.._ 2,090,062.65 — ...•.—_.
N /5 OPEN FUND 4,382.56
/5 CAP FAC FUND OPER FUND 4,364.12
.... A _.._.. .. ... - ._. .._. _. .. ... _ - .. ... ._ .._.._—__..____.__.. .... 525.75
/7 OPER FUND 11,173.64
/7 CAP FAC FUND _...... ._ ... .._..._._....... 42,237.93__
/I1 OPER FUND
/ 33 OPER FUND
T4'bYE�FORR�— _ _/14 CAP FAC FUND _- 1.858.46
/566 OPER FUND 5,537.99
JT OPER FUND _ ,. 729,738.03, -
CORF 368,265.20 - - - --' ---- -
SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FUND 17.122.96
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND _ 191.899.56
6 6,504,635.51
y
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1/26/96 PAGE l
[O REPORT NURSER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
r
WARRANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT DESC0.IPT10N �
J
108345 4014SON UNIFORM R EQUIP. f2.450.03 SAFETY SUPPLIES =;
IUN340 ADVANCED COMPUTER PRODUCTS•ANC 98A6.43 COMPUTER HARDWARE
• i8 ONBTRREEMENTFl-74=�
108348 AIR PRODUCTS L CHENILLE INC. 161.353.32 06M AGREEMENT! - OEYCBr Ged BYStp1 N.0.8-9-89
108349 LEASING ASSOCIATES/AEI STA TE sl•383.32 INTO LEASES
T
10835 AMER.ICAN CRANE INSTITUTE s2. .00 TRAINING CUSS
100351 AMERI FLEET PARTS MUCK PARTS
IN mEIfFrrffSETUS_ 52.11a.41 GAL PARTS
$22 122
n 108353 4MER. SOCIETY FOR MICROOIOLGV R65.00 MEMBERSHIP DUB
CT7 108354 AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY $756.56 FILM _
2 A
G 108356 APCO VALVE A PRIMER CORP f945.63 VALVE
n 1OB357 APPLE ONE $1,119.20 TEMPORARY SERVICES
..HSSH IIO.KllG ULi .S3E7TCORSOET7NG— OCWITANLiNG
1O$359 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $154.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIR
T 108360 AUTO SHOP.EQUIPMENT CO. f6.250.80 TRUCK PARTS -
3W .
108362 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $119.422.96 GRIT REMOVAL M.0.7-13-88
100363 BAY SAFETY A SUPPLY $1,646.88 SAFETY SUPPLIES `
108360 BANCROFT-WHITNEY CO. f87.66 PUBLICATION
108366 P.Y.'BAROTTI AND ASSOC. $6.562.50 CONSTRUCTION P1-34-2.P2-37
Ir"' 108368 84RTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $2.653.15 LAB SUPPLIES
1UB369 BAYLESS STATIONERS $75.57 OFFICE SUPPLIES
N 1O8371 HOWARD BLEVINS 11200.00 DEFERS® COMP DISTRIBUTION ,'
_ 1OB372 BLUE.DIAMOND MATERIALS S396.67 CONCRETE
H
108374 90YLE ENGINEERING CORP S82.077.40 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-16.14-1-10
118375 BREA PRINTING $1.347.25 PRINTING
(n . 51.276.204.99— -CURBTRRCY
108317 BROWN A CALOWELL S1•595.00 LAB SERVICH9 R.
108378 BROWN A CALDWELL CONSULTING $134,198.73 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19
st&3.318.40 CONSTRUMON - - B
108380 F.R. BURNE INDUSTRIAL CORP. 376.813.26 CONSTRUCTION J-24 -
108381 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES. INC. 313.590.Y0 SURVEYING SERVICES US 88-71
.----T673:1 _RZMU ERBXT —.
108383 BY-PRODUCTS MANAGEMENT• INC. 1348.95 FCRROUS C®ARIDE M.0.4-12-89
108304 CS COMPANY $5.163.76 VALVES -
CWPCA CONFERENCE 3175.ag REGISTRATION
108386 CAL-CHER SALES 5241.93 HARDWARE 'i ('
108387 CALTROL • INC. S21.100•UB REGULATOR PARTS
109389 CARLETON ENGINEERS $7,611.50 PROFESSIONAL BBRVICES M.0.5-9-90 _
CIO FUND NO 9199 JT GIST WORKING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/26/9D PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
% COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY -'
CLAIMS PAID v8/01190 POSTING DATE u
A WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMDUNT DESCRIPTION
• I08390 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $503,469.95 ENGINEERING SERVICES I-9.PI-20.P1-34
• 108391 CENTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM 51.666.46 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATION
106392 CHALLENGE BEARING I D• SPLY BARDRARK
• 108393 C" ppp U•5•A•4 INC• fpp♦665,96 UNLEADED GASOLINE
A 8399 DALE CMMI$ IAN C. E 6 . i1r 10.00 @1GINEERIHG.SERVICES J-7-4
e OR 93 • 3 MACHINE REPAIR
106396 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT 51.301.20 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
n: IOR397 COAST INSURANCE AGENCY f38,5B6.00 INSURANCE
pig
im 108399 0.I.E.S. A CO. , INC. $2,216.34 MACHINE REPAIRS
109400 COMP ESE OR CO MP ORENTS OF CALIF i5r507.13 MECHANICAL PANICS
10 401 W R 35 SUBSCRIPTI0 S
, M , 108402 COMPUSERVE $9.37 COMPUTER SERVICES
M 100403 CONARD.S PHOTOGRAPHY $872.31 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
u� S30.5 PAURTS
-
f-1 108405 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL GIST. $6,149.03 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES;
3 108406 CONSOLIDATED FRETONTWAYS $67.74 PREIGEO
IG0407S3.378.15RIH.O.10-11-87
+,lp IOR400 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS 34.026.35 ELUEPRIHTING'M.O.1-10-90
108409, CONVERSE CONSULTANTS WEST SIIS.DO CONSULTING - GEOTECKNICAL SERVICES
10 410 COUNTY W surrun
108411 CRANE VETO
R CORP. $399.60 PIPE
+jam— 108412 CREDIT MARKETS $525.00 PUOLLCATIOS _
4 1 RR P 1EQUIPMENT • 0 SLUDGE RPJS 9 M.O. - -
208414 CYNEREA 52,250.00 MAINTENANCE AGR¢EMEEI
4•� IO0415 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $177.54 DIESEL USE TAR
ONE. INC. • NE ICAL PABTS
L"M 108417 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 3993.14 TIRES
208410 DE ARIA CORPORATION $150.00 STORAGE
Pe 0 UE IM AN 0 IS Co. i .8 van
101120 BIT I IFPO ASSOCIATES $3.034.84 PRINTING
108421 BOLLINGER CORP. i1,978.27 MECHANICAL PARTS
4 . t •d35. E-6 MauM. 108423 OUNKEL BROS. MACH MOVING $1.452.10 SPACE RERICa J-IGA
109424 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. 31,792.60 PAINT SUPPLIES
A . • OFFICE SUPPLIES
148426 W. H. EBERT CORP. $125.450.00 CONSTRUCTION 5-35-1
�4 100427 ECOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING f ANALY $6.325.00 OCEAN MONITORING
re 198428 EFFECIAVL VISUAL IMAGLAT —$14 .25 PRESENTATION AID
...�. 106429 ELECTRONIC BALANCING CO. $390.00 IMPELLER REPAIR
MA 108430 ENCHANTER. INC. 64•B00.00 BEGAN MONITORING H.0.3-14-90 _
106431 INST. YL f L CNOVI I B. 4 LvcA+ SERVICES - OXFORD PROPERTY
108432 MARSHALL FAIRRES $178.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
G.' IC8433 FARR SALES L SERVIC f. $252.92 FILTERS
BA 0 E5rKrc- %Fffm C-DIER. -�>D'l.D��.— AIR MIGHT
10/435 FERRELLGAS $34.43 PROPANE
�FUNO NO 9199 JT DIST HORNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7126/90 PAGE 3
I REPORT NUMBER AP43
w COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS P
> WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION-
108436 FISCHER 6 PORTER CO. $3,315.59 MECeANLCAL PASTS
1 08 437 FISHER SCIENTIFIC Co. $1.195-01 LAB SUPPLIES
COR
I O8439 FDUNTAPN MALL EI CAMERA 521.78 FILM
108440 FOUNTAIN VALLEY TRANSIT MI} 2321.99 GO.M.
o INSTRUMENT PAST
I08442 FO}BONO CO. / HAG SYSTCMS $1.509.31 INSTRUMENT
108443 FDABORO/JORDAN• INC $1.198.33 1NSTRum PART
_ CE PARTS
u n 109445 A.F. FREY $105.00 DEFESREO COMP DISTRIBUTIDN
198446 FRICTION INCORPORATED i86B.03 REFUND USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT -
ia a G NAH BUILDING NATEBiALS
�.n 108448 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. i11990.96 TULEPBONE
10E449 BIERLICH-RITCHELL. INC. $4,963.20 PUMP PASTS
.•• SAFETY TEST� 108451 - GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATI O N� 53.009.00 STREET SWEEPING
Pi FFI 1OB452 DON GREEN G ASSDCIATES $690.00 SURVEYING SERVICES HER 88-72
. ..Tf.. .— CDIRFAIFI 5. MECHANICAL PARTS
CCPE.y57�rm 106454 FRED A. HARPER s1.495.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
b•IM 108455 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 5667.43 GAUGE
I.G. ENGINE PUTS
106457 S. A. HEALY CO. s182.048.19 CONSTRUCTION PI-35-1
1084598 DONALD D. HDNOMICHL f300.00 DEPERRSD CO DISTRIBUTION
�1 • BATTERIES
I— 108460 R.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. 51.394.13 SAFETY SUPPLIES
108461 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STAMP $3.72 RUBBER STAID`
�..yIN. L.Wl.tL.b 96.02u.bu ENGINEERING SERVICES
aw 108463 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $137,581.66 HER LC C®aRIDE X.0.11-08-89
--I 108464 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1.950.05 CONNECTORS
INGRAM PAPERJANITORIAL SUPPLIES
n 158466 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT 5163.45 WATER USEAGE
--1 108467 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $599.52 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES _
ELECTRIC PARTS
108469 NALLEEN•S COMPUTER SUPPLIES $870.21 FILLET SUPPLIES
108470 MAMAN BEARINGS i SUPPLY $533.59 FITTINGS -
G�TOEii . . s5Far5S . CDHSTRUCYION 5-3 4-2
`i 108972 KEN•S OIL• INC. $102.59 WASTE OIL DISPOSAL
108413 KING BEARING. INC. $4.177.71 MACHINE SUPPLIES
—3bSS.vv— PUBCBASING CONSULTANT
108475 MARTIN KORDICK. SR 92.814.40 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 14-1-IB
108416 LEEDS B NORTHRUP 5930.69 INSTRUMENT
E�T(Iff'11— IL ..' CHANDALL L ASSOC. 7.468.0 ENGINEERING SERVICES - GEOTECUNICAL INSPECTION
IOP.478 LEYCO ELECTRIC CO. s97.1t RADIO
A. 1O8479 M.E. LINDSTROM. INC. $2.261.58 MASTER PLAN SERVICES M.0.10-14-90
--l'290•0$— PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
108481 MALCOLM PIRNIE r INC. 58.104.57 ENGINEERING SERVICES N.0.7-12-89
. 1 a
(
LIT FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/26/90 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43 -.
= COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
OalOIfVG
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
• 108482 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $189.61 INSTRUIENT SUPPLIES
108483 MATT - CHLOR• INC. 6899.06 CHORIIUNTION PARTS
ON M .UR R 54,650.00 CONSULTING - OCEAN STUD
108485 MAXWELL COLORS f18.30 PROTD DEVELOPING
1184 MCMASTER.CARR SUPPLY CO. $426.65 TOOLS
a A C C $16.87 MILEAGE MERGE
71 108408 RES COMPANY $13.740.51 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
108489 ryl PO MOTION 1379.17 METER REPAIR
gr lit RUA 928.415.25 COMPUTER WARE SOLR4IABE
G1 108991 MILLTRONICS $2.258.05 INSTRUMENT
.�RI 1OB992 MOORE 6 TABER $21.350.00 E ERGENCY SEWER REPAIRS DIST 7
n Cy 6 9. MOTION INDUSTRIES. INC. $ .6 wCRANIGAL PARTS
n]a 100494 MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICES $102.29 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES
108495 MULTIYIRE DIVISION 1576.30 REFUND USSR FEE OVHRPATHEN2
SERVICES.208496 NATIONAL PLANT
S3bw. �0 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
ITT 108497 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $121.13 LUZ OIL "
:3 108496 GUST K. NEWBERG CONST. CO. $1.923.647.20 CONSTROCTIOS P1-33 _
.� 1 6124.27
INSTRUMENT PART
108500 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $7.80 WATER USEACE
1 RB501 NORTH SUPPLY 9117.56 TELEPHONE PART
. 1 IOa5O2 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES S364.77 SAFETY CLASSES
108503 OK SYSTEMS CO. $28.503.03 CHLORINS M.0.2-14-90
108504 ORANGE BEARING. INC. $180.16 MECHANICAL PARTS
K E S579.68 SPECIALTY CASES
IO9506 CSOOC SELF-FUNDED MEDICAL INS $150.000.00 PREMIUM ADVANCE
108507 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $2.196.01 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE
PUMP PAM::
100509 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $331.29 NAPETY SUPPLIES
..� 1085f0 PACIFIC BELL $654.63 =PRONE
] MOLAR io."62 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE
108512 PAR WEST f734.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIER
1.8513 PARTS UNLIMITED i1.750.31 VEHICLE PARTS
ham— $4.001.61 CYLINDER MAIN
100515 PEAT., MARWICK. MAIN S CO. $5.000.00 AUDITING SERVICES M.O.3-9-88
106516 ROT REND RGRAFT f495.00 DEPENDING COMP DI519IBOTIOtl
OB 1 PIMA ORO YS 3• INC. $44,978.4tSLUDGE REMOVAL M.O. -I1-8
106518 PITNEY HOPES $172.13 POSTAGE METER RENTAL
10E519 POLYPUPE• INC. $36,464.49 POLYMERS M.O.1-1G-90 8-9-69
•L9— LAB SUPPLIES
_ 108522 POYEP ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. fll B.78 ENGINE P SUPPLIES
Mr 108522 POVEq SYSTEMS i163.11 ENGINE PARSE
j� 108523 NAROLU FR MNOS ICE 11HINt ICE
FY 102524 THE PROJECTS SOLUTION CO. f2.544.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION N.O.E-IO-BB
W: 308525 RED WING SHOES $197.22 SAFETY SHOES
6 N.E•0•I`. ------- f9T0:7J—_ INDEXES
108527 REDI EMPRESS 640.00 DELIVERY CHARGES
. . R
1
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITOL PROCESSING DATE 7/26/90 PAGE 5
CCl REPORT NUMBER AP43
1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
_ 7ffn74r-PUSY
WARRANT NO. VEND Oft AMOUNT DESCRIPTION -_
10852E P.A. REED ELECTRIC $5,145.32 PUMPS -
108529 REPEDY TEMP 52.637.83 TEMPORARY SERVICES
4. p HERRING ESPERSE
108531 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. 52.135.15 GAUGE
108532 J. R. ROBERTS CORP. f1O4.747.52 CONSTRUCTION J-7-4
CONSTRUCTION J-V
108534 J. R. ROBERTS $158.387.04 CONSTRUCTION J-20
108535 ROSEMOUNT/UNILOC $1.562.95 INSTRUMENT PART _-
TS CLZOPER
y 108537 SANCON ENGINEERING . INC. $184,410.00 CONSTRUCTION 3-33R -
m 108538 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS f463.76 ELECTRIC MOTOR -
a . . SERVICES DIST S ENGINEERING 14.667
C 108540 SCHULER ENGINEERING CORP. 5227.539.76 CONSTRUCTION PI-27-162
n 108541 SEA COAST DESIGNS $100.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES -
. iuuzqz SEARS. ROEBUCK G CO. TOOLS —_
1 O8S93 SHAMROCK SUPPLY S1.3T3.55 TOOL
FF� 1U8108444 SLIDE MASTER $114.75 PRESENTATION AIDS 3
3 1095f5— ZRI. i-EMLKY CO, $1,414.baSOIL TESTING M 0 l4 89
108546 SOFT WAREHOUSE S148.74 COMPUTER SOFTWARE ,4
W 108547 SOLAR TURBINES INC. 52.334.31 TURBINE REPAIR
OPERATING FEES.
1 108549 SOUTH .COAST AIR QUALITY $1,572.80 SOURCE TEST AS
188550 SOUTH COAST WATER/- 5201.50
� 19"Vol S'OUITILAN CAIII:LOI5 . 4445.151.41 POIPdffiYI BeGxeL
POWER
A
I-- 108552 SO. CAL. GAS CO. $262.67 NATURAL GAS -
108553 SO. CALIF. WATER CO. 5102.50 WATER USEAGE -
CJ • . DIESEL FUEL
N IOBSSS SPACESAYER SYSTEMS. INC.
• $6.490.52 FILING SYSTEM PARTS
108586 SPARNLETTS ORINKING WATER $1.782.01 DRINKING WATER/CDGLER RENTALS
auuozl STAMEN Z. SPASSOFF, P.L. $4.J83.110 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-20.P1-34-1
108558 WESTALLOT INC. 239.12 WELDING SUPPLIES
Cl 108559 STAR TOOL 6 SUPPLY CO. $1.157.26 70DIS
CA
• .Iw- STEEL -
108561 SUNSET F LANDSCAPE 6 MAINT. 33$112.67 TRUCK
GROONDSREBPING tl.0.8-9-89 , IG
IOB562 SUNSET POWER
f112.67 JANITORIAL,
RIAL, -
luu,63 SUPER JANITOBTAL SUPPLI85
108564 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL. INC. f3.320.60 TOOLS
308565 EE TLANO CO. fS7T.55 FITTINGS
1
• �.. ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
108567 TCH ASSOCIATES $752.38 TAR SUPPLIES -
268568 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD $5.057.52 VAR LEASES _-
PUBLICATION
108570 TONY•S LOCK 6 SAFE SERVICE $72.19 KEYS
108571 TRAVEL TRAVEL $656.00 TB m SERVICES -
TRUCK 5172:fz TRUCK PARTS -
108573 J.G. TUCKER S SON. INC. $2.142.91 INSTRUMENT PARTS -
CIU..
CO FUND NO 9149 • JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7126/90 PAGE E
I REPORT NUMBER AP43
J? COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OPANC.E COUNTY
CLAIMS POSTING DATE 0810119D
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
1D8574 TWINING LABORATORIES OF $5.204.25 SOIL TESTING N.0.6-14-89
1DR575 UNITCD PARCEL SERVICE $79.50 PARCEL SERVICES
108576 UNITED PUMPING SERVICE s324.50 VACUUM TRUCE SmnCE
108577 VMS (VISUAL MGMT. SYSTEMS) $1.003.22 INSTREffi1T HAIR
108578 Y SCIENTIFIC - 53.115.9E LAB swain.
Y s686.1 MLCMANICAL PASTS
100588 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. S6.057.13 FITTINGS
1OB581 CARL WARREN a CO. $874.61 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR
D B E-E . • 'PESO_ CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-9-89
.C1 108583 WOODRIDGE PRESS $20.953.56 BROCNUBB
.m I11584 ROURKE L WOODRUFF $44.559.90 LEGAL 58RVICE9 M.0.6-14-8
.d RE 0 C P. S3.266.83 COPIER LEASES
•n 108581 GEORGE YARDLEY COMPANY S131.96 VALVE
IOB587 21EBAR7N AND ALPER 6674.849.05 CONSTRUCTION P2-37
.--I 3b. -__--N _ DEEM= COULD TE P DISIBUI'ION
ITT ------
TOTALIm
Ls • . 6
�7t eves-----•--v
00
Y
01 OPEC FUND i 34.77
02 OPER FUND 133.434.z4
02 CAP PAC FUND 84.339.22
03 OPER FUND 216.850.54
F5 OPER FUND 6.050.50
05 CSP FAC FUND 688.853.19
06 OPER EEO 98.00
CAP FAC FUND 732.36
07 OVER FUND 24.287.14
07 CAP PAC FUND 173.209.64
fil OPEK FIIND
014 OPER FUND 966.00
O14 CAP FAC FUND 126.87/.12
75566 OPER FUND
0667 OPER FUND 3.589.59
07614 OPER FUND 5.302.92
PRR FUND T3 .52T.DT—
¢+ CORF 7,678,772.93
I BFI/WORKERS CON' INSURANCE FUNDS 196. 0.86
. 37 ROWING CAPITAL FUND 04 .3
6 10.546.992.16
n FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/08/90 PAGE I
� REPORT NUMBER AP93 -
CLAIMS PAID 00/15/90 POSTING DATE D8/15/90
WARRANT N0, VENOOP AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
188614 NAG SYSTEMS $379.44 INSTRUMENT PART
__100615 __ ASR_A N4LYSIS S940.00 PUMP_-MI&BATIOHANALISIS ..
_ 108616 AT 8 T $465.35 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICE
_ 108617 ACLU - SLUDGE $469.11 EAR SUPPLIES
_ 106618 LINCOLN_ AREPAIRS
_ 1Ob619 AIR ACCESSORIES CO. $203.06 CWRESSDR Pan
10862D ALPHAGAL $1.019.88 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
____106fi21 __.__RDBCO INC._.UDR 4MERICAN SEALS f5.074.g2.— -_-IIACNiMg_SYPPLIES _-_
A 108622 AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY 8541.97 MESAS
'n 108623 ANAHEIM SEVER CONSTRUCTION 93.786.58 ]ROAD REPAIRS DIST 7
Tn 102624 BLAKE P. ANDERSON f765.40 MEETINGEIPENSE
G3
C 1Ob625 dNI07ER - WIRE fl CABLE $149.30 CABLE
D 10b626 ANTHONY'S MECH. fl MACHINE. INC $322.00 ]1ECBANICAL PARTS
.10862L. _A-P.L VS_S.L STERS 12.497K77 ___ NDTICE9 d AD9 _
,t om 108628 APPLE ONE $890.96 TEfRRomY SERVICES
_.FTI 108629 ARATE3 SERVICES. INC. $6.925.49 UNIFORM RENTAL&
3*3 2DR630 .AMI2ONA,I NSTRUMENT f4.97E.dD_ INSTROlO!NT REPAIR
# 108631 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CO. $266.95 TRUCK PARTS
00 208632 B S I HYDRAULICS f1.127.83 PUMP PARTS
10fl63.3--.-EALCON_OISPQSALSERY34E 9179,930,98 ___._-._ GBIT10O79YAhM,D.Z13_88 _
I 108634 P.V. BAROTTI AND ASSOC. $6.562.50 CONSTRUCTION SERUM PI-34-2.P2-37'
635 84RTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $2.052.36 LAB SUPPLIES
S OFFICE SUPPLIES
T- 108637 ROBERT BEIN.WILLIAN FROST R AS $22.383.35 ENGINEERING SBRW= 5-33.3-34
108638 BOLTRONIK DATA MAINTENANCE i1SB.00 COMPUTER DISK MAINTENANCE
r IORC3 9 _B ON-AGUES._- fil e`34____ TRUCK PARTS
Cn 108640 BRENNER-FIEDLER 6 ASSOC.. INC. $745.73 COMPRESSOR PARTS
--1 108641 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. S1.157.24 CBLORENB NETRR
iV 108642 RROYN� fILNWFII tP.714.AD LAS SERVICES
n 108643 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE $1,418.40 PUBLICATION
-1 108644 GARY G. STREEO $1,769.50 PETTY MR REIMBURSEMENT
CL)_.108615_ - __.CS COMPANY ._._.._--__. 2222.16.__._.
.. 108646 CAL-FAC CHEMICAL CO.. INC. $186.90 CHEMICALS
106647 CALTROL . INC. $1.024.97 INSTRIBOOT SUPPLIES -
lES6.4S___.9MEILIEA7L41.Gxs s3.622..39 _--_. -1A8_SVPPLieS
108649 CHRISTINE T. CARE f728.0A COMPOTES INPUT SERVICES
108650 CHARLES Y. CARTER CO. S657.19 HYDRAULIC CYLINDER
.__.__. 306651 _. _ CENTURY. PAINT . }173.06. _._ . _—_.PALMI SUPPLIES_____.
108652 CENTURY SAFETY INST. A SUPF. $628.68 SAFETY SUPPLIES
._ 108653 CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC. $3.092.95 UNLEADED GASOLINE
IOR65A__-_-.CMEYRUNJ1aS..A.._l@C. _ t7.10_S.yl-___.-__-_ .EEPVNR-USEE.YSE.DVERYAYIffiNf _
108655 CHROME CRANKSHAFT, INC. 6260.00 MECHANICAL PART
106656 CHURCH ENGINEERING. INC. $89.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-13
. ._. ....lUbLST._ _ _. ._ COAST AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION-. -_ _..2383.80. . . ..... __.__._TRUCK PARTS.
108650 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT S1.160.25 Fin EXTINGUISHERS
108659 COILS UNLIMITED $451.56 ELECTRIC PARTS
n
P7 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST MORNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/08190 PAGE 2
N REPORT NUMBER pP43
CLAIMS PAID 06/15/90 POSTING GATE 08115190
'+! ueReeNT NO, VEgnne LMnnur DESCRIPTIOX
i,
! 108660 COLICH AND SONS 180.203.35 CONSTRUCTION 2-11-3
t O866L__._COLE.SRAUTOMATIINI- sf 9163.00-_._ _REFUND US FEE
OVERPAYMENT
ID8662 COMPUTER AUTOMATION i163.98 BROCHU USER F6 OYP.RPAYlt@1T
IDA663 CONARD+B PHOTOGRAPHY 6904.19 BROCHURE ISINORH
Div tpBb64 -CON _ r9nrx DARTS_
1OB665 CONSOLIDATED ELEC741CAL DIST. $11,592.92 BLBCIBIC SUPPLIES
108666 CONSOLIDATED FREIGMTMAYS $94.36 MIGHT
.10Bb6L—_-L➢RT AWES IZED..LHEMI C., n.....A svt.9TR.y.e__.._ _ _-_-MD Nen DISPOSA1.—---__
306668 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO 42.299.75 CHLORINE N.0.10-11-89
cil._TT! 106669 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS $9.901.15 BLUBPIINITNG
No t7 108671 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY 6230.01 7111a PARTS
n 3086tt COUNTY VXOLESALE ELECTRIC i1.396.32 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
1086I3__---.AIMILALPB➢CESSORSAINC.. •f.Pu.OI_._ _-_—.-_-]nxmvrev aUprrrxs ____ _
-.y 108674 CAL STATE UNIV. FULLERTON $495.00 SHOIBTEATION
-M , " ..5 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE $870.19 TIRES
='$ t..... pre➢ f9A e_t0 dKCffliC R11PPIS8R
# 108677 DIFILI►PO ASSOCIATES $42.50 BUSINESS CARDS
_00 3OB678 DONALD CALLENDAR FAMILY TRUST 883.34 REFUND USSR PEE OVERPAYMENT
1GB674__.--.__-__OUNN_E➢VABDSl➢RP. 25 22S.St 'PAT ETS=IES_____ _
1 108600 EASTMAN. INC. iIv119.98 OFFICE SUPPLIES
.I n 308611 ECOANALYSES. INC. $327.52 OCEAN NOm"UNG
R+F-• tne..2 rnin•A.v nuu n . noxexY ever_ uP 9en_nn CONTRIBUTION - vnmN ®DcenTnx renrve.
a`f 108683 EGSHEAD UNIVERSITY 6194.06 REGISTRATION
=T- 100604 ENCHANTER. INC. i886.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.3-I4-90
- -10N6B5_-__ ._.�IOHtl_B._F1LNENS.TEItl3.E.- s. cna_nn _ _-,_----CONSlRUCTIOx s2eV*n2c ]dd._1-20.1-17 _
C T/7 108666 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. 962.25 AIR MIGHT
v� 108687 FEARELLGAS $11.48 PROPANE
a .ns uR CHE99r-1- INp .n2v_O0 xvrxeurm+. s.mvrr2a
_n 106189 FILTER SUPPLY CO. A2$157.30 CID.ORItUIION PARTS
=y IOB690 FISCHER L PORTEN CO. $7.065.13 MORINATION PARTS
_ILL.-.-108691__...._. FISHER SCIENTIEIC_CO.._.--. _-. 1+29.23__. ... _...._...___ .LAB SrePLIEs-__..___._ _..___.______
1O8692 FLAT i VERTICAL CONCRETE $158.25 CONCRE31 CUTTIKC
108693 FLUID TECH $416.46 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
--SOS89' ,"ORAtl1CS .ur_ ....... .._.......MEEXxxrrer. Lmm.TPc
108695 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA 6247.35 FILM
108696 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $9,136.14 WATER USEACE
.__._... 108697 FOR ENTERPRISES-.. _ ._ _. __-__.---.�1LBY5.00.... . _____._-SAFICE -CONSULTANT________._
188698 THE FOXBORO COMPANY i98.43 COASTS
108699 CITY OF FULLERTON $143.30 NAM DSEAGE
__4G8100----._.SANAMLIUBRER_L➢ scnn�jH_-____ -_BARpuevTh mmva __ __
166701 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $13.54 TELEPHONE SERVICE
10670 GEORGE LEECH 6 ASSOCIATES $1.246.65 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
. ... . ..108703 - ... HARBOUR ENGINEERING. _.. ... _ _— 1.11.➢87.50. ._._ _. NECEANICAL.SUPPLIES _.
308704 HATCH 6 MIRK. INC. $449.61 GRANS PASTE - --- -- -
108705 HILTI. INC. $690.73 BARDNARE
.J
n
-N
xz
a
11 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST MORNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/O0/90 PAGE 3
W REPORT NUMBER API! -
--$� MIN
CLAI SA NATAT MO•' 5/DISTRICTS OF oDATE 081LINTY
CLAIMS PAID o8/15/90 POSTING DATE OB/15/9D
+. MARRANi_N0. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
100706 HOERHIGER C.V.S. CALIF. r INC. 3457.28 MECHANICAL PARTS
36 _UL"L MOUSE OF BATTERIES 62,973,71 Y _ pe'rteprxp
1O870A R.S. HUMES CO.. INC. $1.614.49 PAINT SUPPLIES
708709 INC INDUSTRIES $3.129.00 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
IOB710 ISCO, IN
_ 106711 I.S.I. WEST $1,104.96 INSTEUMENT
106712 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $56.965.09 FLRRIO/FERROus CNI.URIUE M.O.11-O8-89
..aARlli___IMnU$IRLl.Tnf.ADED PR QQUCTS $1.100.15_.—.._ CDNNECIQRS
100713 INGRAM PAPER $2,146.01 JANITURIAL SUPPLIES
�fq 296715 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $129.52 WATER USUG6
L= 102716 ..ANUS. INC 2111.72 Lea AHPPLipB
Mp 1O6717 JAM CATERING 6134.75 MEETING MUSE
_3w 106718 JOE+S WATER TRUCKS 3576.00 WATER TREK RENTAL DIET 5 •+
LOUIs.__ I.DNNSTONc__SUPELY 134A.71 E.ECT81C_SImwu
e 1 108720 THE KEITM CORPANIES $1.238.50 ENGINEERING SERVICEB 5-3565-36
M 108721 KING BEARING, INC. 4662.18 MACHINE SUPPLIER
= 3 1.,711 NE. ..F.. SSI 7.sa TENPOMRT SERVICES
-tt
108723 MARTIN BORDICK. SP $2,322.20 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 5-35-1
_ 00 108724 LAN SUPPORT GROUP $154.00 BINDING SERVICES
j 1A2.725„_. _..__LASER .SUEELIES_L_SERVICL S76e.66_—.._—. 2RIBL SUPPLIES__
108726 LAUNDERLAND 357.11 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAT
=�
116727 LIEBERT CORPORATION $129.63 ELECTRIC EQUII'MERT
••>.� ' fnp]PP B.P�LINDSTPnM. INC, 32.3E 9.A0
_f— 106729 LORAIN PRODUCTS $1.254.29 RELIANCE POWER NAINTCNANCE
M7 108730 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 02 $131.376.00 POOLED ElISSONS EST3MATINO PROGRAM
1➢0731 .MRC..OP.P.L LED_EMVIAOABERTAL sx.tx2�flA—. __ I,Afl_SEMCU
P(p _.
108732 MDT BIOLOGIC COMPANY 5393.67 LAR SUPPLIES
108733 MPS 3132.1E PHOTOGRAPEIC SERVICES
q .nA)4 •eS C. S26S.e7 SIRVTCe R'ARPJIPNT
108735 MARINE 6 VALVE SUPPLY $149.93 VALVE
'L--1 108736 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $60.53 INSTRUMENT' SUPPLIES
MCBAIN .INSTRUMENTS__.._.__.. Sa3.1.D.0_ _lAlLM6IN'CENANCE__._____
108738 MCNASTER-CARR SUPFLY CO. $676.99 SAFETY SUPPLIES
108739 MEASUREMENT CONTROL SYS. INC. $1,906.93 BEARINGS
JlEDLIRSDNoms en_ 337A.4% -PLUNGING.SUppT.T., _
206701 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO. $4.13408 SAFETY SUPPLIES
106742 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL. INC. $167.88 PUBLICATION
MONITOR PUBLISHING. CO...------- SM.la_ SUBSCRIPTION—_
108744 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES $2.681.95 LAB SERVICES
108745 MOTOROLA. INC. 3358.06 RADIO PAGER
_lOB7/6 __NATIONALGUVERNORIA P®LICATION
108747 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES. INC. $1,722.50 VACUUM TRUCK SBRVICEB
208796 NORTH SUPPLY $55.24 TELEPHONE BELL
_... 138749...__.... _.._.00CUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES
206750 DA SYSTEMS CO. $52.257.91 CHLORINE H.0.2-13-90
108753 CYNTHIA O+NEIL $50.64 MILEAGE MUSE
C" FUND NO 9299 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0/OR/90 PAGE 4
1
,Q REPORT NUMBER AP43
rnCLAI s.u1TDT 08/1"CTA POSTING
DATE 08115/9
CLAIMS PAID 08/I5/90 POSTING GATE OB/15/90
17;
pl -ARRANT YO_ _VFNOOR ^ AMn11Mi DESCRIPTTON
r. l DA752 OPERATION TECHNOLOGY INC. $1.062.50 SERVICE ACREEDEiT
._„___DROWSE nraB1116._1NL 13.0]1.3 D_ MpnxemeeT PARTS _
' 10,793= 105754 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. 4549.75 TRUCE PARTS
wL 108755 ORANGC COUNTY INDUSTRIAL $2.976.56 FIBERGLASS
11 18 LUA _ORAAGE._UALYE S Pln luG rn. n.Als.nn _ mlmvrw
106757 OXYGEN SERVICE $1.188.97 SPECIALS- CASES
106758 COUNTY OF ORANGE $302.40 MAPPING SERVICES
105732.__.. ___ .ORANGE.LDUNTY__HARSHALL _— AE2q.1y P/RjUR __CRAWS'
.ram, 1O6760 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $8.146.06 REMORSE WORKERS comp INSORADCE
108761 PR WEST ENTERPRISES $66.15 IA100'.NASION SHEETS
Al.. psYTp
IGBI63 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. 52.766.23 SAFETY SUPPLIES
108764 PACIFIC SEWER MAINTENANCE CORP $4.321.00 SEWER ROOT CONTROL 11REAT1®'l DIGS 7
_�lAp 7L5 PACIFIL_BELL______
:H 108766 PACIFIC BELL 121 A85.22 REPAIR PAC. SELL EQUIFMEIS
'3 1D8767 PARTS ENGINEERING COMPANY 9252.39 COIMPRESSOR PARTS
.np 7LA BATS II NI lY1TCn S1Y9_LS Tp11rP pApTA
108769 PIMA SRO SYSTEMS, INC. 545.201.55 SLEDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88
70 108770 PLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE $67.39 HARDWARE
iD8271_.__..._HOLY PJ1AEa-iNG._.._____ s1 R.525_'AN__._______ YOLYeB95_M.d l-10=9p.Sr9_89
c1 108772 PORTER BOILER SERVICE. INC. $774.09 ELECTRIC PAST
.1}' 1OB773 POWER TRACK. INC. $78.35 EeSB.
9p' Tnp 77A oorYulY [nN-rrn Nn "TAT
f7 108775 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE 5104.OD ICE
�y IOAT76 PROFESSIONAL PUBLICATIONS. INC $73.53 PUBLICATION
5..._10R7]L -THE_MJECTSSO1AI10N.1D._ _ Se.eM 2.A G__ _ -_. .____13SIRLIDDI TIGM.IRAppc EON M.d8=10-o8____
LYI 108778 PULSAFEEDER $48.71 WITER
IOA179 HMS. INC. $13.048.84 CIKPMR SUPPLIES/PRINTER
.nplpn J1HA' mY RFERIG..TTnu sP9p_Pl �HSTRInIRNT SlNpll pn
C1 • 108781 RADIOLOGICAL TRAINING SERVICES $150.OU RENTAL EQOIPKENT
•+-1 108782 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. 51.050.61 TRASH BIN RE OVAL
108723. _. __.._. A.D_.SYSTEMS. INC... .._._..___._._- s153.6D__.____._ PICCUEE
_ 308764 RECYC♦ INC. 567.640.00 SLEDGE REMOVAL M.0.2-10-88
108785 REDI EXPRESS S39•0O LAB SUPPLIES
_ I-A7-1 .1ME-REEIS.TEM _ SAIa_5A_. KnITVRS A eb.
208787 REMEDY TEMP $619.20 TEMPORARY SERVICES
IOS78S THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. 3244.99 CONNECTORS
. _.109789 _. __ __ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL___ -_-3SS5.38 _. _._._._ INSTRAXIENZPART_____
148790 ROSEMOUNT/UNILOC 5357.02 FITTINGS
108791 JOSEPH T. RYERSON S SON. INC. $456.13 STEEL
Re L3." --RARDWARE_
IOH793 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $326.61 ELECTRIC MUCOR PARTS
. 206794 SARBS-PDC 3375•3O REGISTRATION
_._... 198.795. _ .. DOUG SARVIS ...__.__._.-
109796 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT-L —__—� $42,253.27 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-13-90
108T97 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES. INC $517.44 SPECIALTY GASES
Jri
r
f1 FUND NO •199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE B/CB/90 PAGE 5
LIT 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CnC SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OAEE COUNTY _
CLAIMS
AI XS PAID OB/15/9D POSTING DATE O8115190
WARRANT NO, VENDOR AMOUNT _ DESCRIPTION
_ 108798 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS. INC. $980.00 LAB SUPPLIES
_1,Q0799 1.11_A F]_QUfGN$_ $962.18_ _ OpE1CR PBRNITDRE
_ 108600 CITY DF SEAL BEACH $210.50 WATER USEAGE
_ 166601 SETON NAME PLATE CORP. 5011.66 TAGS
_ IDAR02 SN6NNQEvS_SNPPLV 698E 09 TOOLS .
_ 108803 SHEPHERD MACHINERY CO. 6629.76 TRUCE PASTS
168804 SMITH-EMERV CO. $1.120.50 SOIL TBSTLNG M.0.6-14-89
_1011817___. _-.SQFI_N6NENQUSb_.. -._ Sn,3�.-_--__._-- OWWUTBR_SQIIAANR _
IO8
806 GOLAN TURBINES INC. S313.92 FREIGHT
1088G7 SO. COAST AIR GU ALI TT $5.553.00 PERMIT PEES
...... SOUTH COAST WATER S97_na RRNTAL QuirmENT
D 1088G9 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. $17.913.67 PONES
_D 198810 SO. CAL. OAS CO. $3,356.40 NATU6AL GAS
. JPBB11 SOU7HERN_-C.6L1fs_QAS_CQ. S2R.252yQ5__._ _QASLING_REPTACEHM-
IDBB12 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $11.192.68 DIESEL FURL
t�E1 1O8B13 STAMEN 2. SPASSOFF. P.C. $4.500.00 • ENGINEERING SE6VIC61 PI-34-2.J-T9-I.J-l5
-9 1nAR14 WESTALLOY INC. ss69.20 NELDIxc sDPecies
:9t 108815 STAR TOOL 6 SUPPLY CO. 5975.63 TOOLS
-0p IOP8l6 SUMMIT STEEL $3,5/8.90 STEEL
.__70BB17_.__._--.
1O8818 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL, INC. 56.033.35 NOES
./1�t 108819 SWEETLAND CO. 5762.84 FIWINGS
lxppfR TAYI nR.nRmN sP90.06 '1'NOCR PARTS
308821 THA/NORCAL $228.00 LAB SERVICES
' 108822 Y07AL TECHNICAL SERVICES $714.50 CONTRACT SERVICES PI-34-2 yam
MEFl LLONTROL_SERv,ci. Ixt. A53.47 __. reuCEyARTs -_
Z I08624 TRAVEL TRAVEL 31.918.00 MVEL SERVICES
1 108825 H.O. TRERICE CO. $695.66 INSTR@ffF1' SUPPLIES
-� .xpp 2'
""' A ADITHUM PARTS
108827 J.G. TUCKER N SON, INC. 519949.07 INSTRUMUNNT PARTS
108828 U.S. AUTO CLASS CENTER,INC. $198.00 TRUCK PARTS
-.:2_10SB29 -U.S. WATE0. NE Y5_______.-_.-_ A34aII4___.____--- SUBSCSIPTIOIL---__
108830 UNOCAL $276.71 UNLEADED GASOLINE
108831' UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 5143.92 FARM SERVICES
_ .O.832 yYHSCIENI1Ell. sp.uR_I7 LAH SoePLles
l OBA33 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $3.662.61 FITTINGS
108834 VAREC DIVISION 5396.28 INSTRUNINT REPAIR
IOHB35_.._.- .._. C. K. VARNEI CO... _ENC.-__-__ 1395.26_- _ _._--__BUILDING-MATERIAL@______
108836 VERTEX SYSTEMS $975.00 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
10SR37 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 9515.33 SAFETY SUPPLIES
InRR3R CARL._YABEEN__L_= _ S2L6jj _ INSURANCE_C1AIM3_ADJORTER
108839 WESTERN CORPORATE IMAGES $932.90 OFFICE EQUIPM¢<TI
1OBE00 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY 133.814.46 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-9-89
._ . ._.I08041._... _ WILLOAN ASSOCIATES .__.. _�6J404 La71__._._.._..__-___ENGINEERING.SERVLGES 2-26-2.2727
108842 ROURKE S WOODRUFF $52,625.73 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.6-4-89
108843 WORDPERFECT CORP. S1T0.00 COaUTER SOFTWARE
f"T FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/06/90 PAGE 6
CJ1 REPORT NUMBER AP93
f CLAIMS
SANITATION I 81 5DISTRICTS IN DARIE_CDDRT9
.CLAIMS PAID 0B/15/90 POSTING DATE GB/15/90
ARRANT ND. _yENn nN eNODNT OESC8IPI ION
4 108844 REROR CORP. $3,696.75 COPIES 7MASS
lOH fl6i_._.__.___8EORGE_IA6DLEY.SIIMP.A NY seAA,2L. ._..__._-- _VAVLB-PARTS __.
-----------------
�- SUMNART AMOUNT
[S7 B2 OPSS FUN) $ 3,959.28
3? B2 CAP PAC FUND 163,059.38
- #1_OPER FUND..._—. _..
05 TOPER FUND 217.36
05 CAP PAC FUND 28.352.21
FUKL--- 182.00
07 OPER FUND 10,657.61
a0 07 CAP PAC FUND 5,491.83
__. .0.11.DFRR.FUN4_—_ .. . .. .._._.__.—_. ro•oe1.38___.__. _._..._ _- ___. --.__
'• I 014 OPER FUND .._._.. 742.47 -
13j, 014 CAP PAC VRID 15.916.92
sl 1!8R FUND 9.92
'Ir JT OPER FUND 691.508.67
CORD 180.397.13
SELF_FUNDED WQWR_S_CORP INSORANCJ1
N JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND 129.677.93
b = 1.268.774.84
mow-
t7
J n
d -
A
FUND NO 9199 . JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/23190 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43 -'
CLAIMS PAID O8/29/90 POSTING DATE 08/29/90
108904 ABC PAINT STRIPING SERVICE $1.990.04 PAINT SUPPLIES
108906 HAS SYSTEMS $379.44 IH9TRONENT ",
108907 AT 6 T $520.70 TELEPHONE SER"m
° b 100909 ACTIN-MARTIN $930.75 TOOL CHEST'
108910 ADAMSON UNIFORM 6 EQUIP. 91.048.69 LAB SUPPLIES
° 2 108912 AIR ACCESSORIES CO. $533.48 COMPHPSSOB PARTO'"
108913 AIR PRODUCTS 6 CHEMICAL INC. $15.296.00 CWX AGREBIffiRT-- 031DHH DENEBATION SYSTEM X.D. 8-9-
108915 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 525.97 ASPHALT °
108916 LEASING ASSOCIATES/ALLSTATE $249.31 AUTOMOBILE LEASES
Y
•3 Ingle ALPHAGAZ 6437.20 PROPAXII. - I
/08919 BOSCO INC. S/OR AMERICAN SEALS SI.725.50 HAROWABE
R 108921 AMERITECH S9T.75 COPIES LEASES
1 100922 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION 63,500.60 SEWER REPAIRS DIST 5 )t
c
D f08924 ANI%TER - WIRE 6 CABLE - i562.07 COIBOTEe PAeT < r -r -_
E- OR925 ANTHONY-$ MECH. 6 MACHINE. INC $1.634.26 P@@ PARTS
C7 108927 AQUATIC CENTER S400.00 AIR CARDS
N 108928 ARATEK SERVICES. INC. S4.109.22 ORIPORM RIU=S
FM
108930 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE S167.463.85
108931 BACKSTREET GALLERY S119.21 GRIT REMOVAL 10.29-90 ES, 1
PBE EA SERVSCEB,
' 108933 P.Y. BAROTTI AND ASSOC. $6.125.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES P1-34-2.P2-31.P2-23-6
108934 S. BATEMAN S555.00 ➢EFRRREU COMP DISTRIBUTION
bAB SUPPLIES
108936 BIYLESS STATIONERS S95.51 OFFICE SUPPLIES
108937 BEARINGS 6 DRIVES. INC. 61,040.85 HAUVARE
108939 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE S162.00 RADIATOR REPAIR
108940 9ON-A-RUES S515.01 TROCK PARTS
6TRUGTIBN-3-I
10-9.2 BROWN 6 CALDWELL $1.990.00 LAE SERVICES
1U8943 STEVE BUBALO CONSTRUCTION CO. $191.390.22 CONSTRUCTION 16-1-IR
RR. °... ° SON 99R
108945 THE BURKE COMPANY S99.59 INSTRUMENT PART
YC3 1OP946 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $591.57 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
N AWOL
f0894B GARY G. STREED .so 221.53 PETTY CASE LIEHBURSFffi1R
I OB 949 BUTLER PAPER COMPANY 12d1.53 OPPICB SUPPLIES
J.
� 1
�j FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/23/90 PAGE 2
N REPORT NUMBER AP43
CLAIMS PAID 08/29/90 POSTING DATE 08/29/90'
° ID8950 CPT CORP. / SUMMIT SOLUTIONS $4.076.10 SERVICE AGREOIOM'S
' 1OB952 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH, INC. S317.69 LAB SUPMEA.
• ID8953 CAL-PAC CHEMICAL CO., INC. $358.34 - CtlEt¢CALB
108955 JOHN CAROLLD ENGINEERS 1311.111.11 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-36,P2-42.Y1-34
11 108956 CHRISTINE T. CARR S610.00 COMPUTER INPUT SERVICES
' 188956 CENTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM $5.015.68 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 1 "_;• T
-'• ITT 188959 CHAMPION FENCE CO. $6.557.00 PENDING r, y.•'RYu, `��;
1• n 108961 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT S568.51 SAFETY SUPPLIES
108962 COAST INSURANCE AGENCY S681.00 INSURANCE
108963
• '-1 108964 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF i1.406.20 BEAFP ;:? _ lat-a ' '.R
fTi 109965 CONARD•S PHUT OGR APHT i223.13 PBOTpiRAP�C SBHYIC68 �+�rHk *i:.>:• r
Yt 108967 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. 69.026.59 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
' 00 108968 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS S1.114.53 BLURPRINTING
108970 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $2.511.34 ' ELECTRIC SUPPLIES F TzY.r
y 108971 DAVID WILLIAM CRAPRELL $166.58 SHOCKERS SERVICES- b
r ID8973 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE $710.39 TIMES
° 108974 TON DAWES $38.58 MEETING MUSE
IS
108976 DECO 53.08 BLeC1'B;G SUPPLIES 4 �'
10E977 DEZURIK AND/OR CS CD. i7$9.06 YL@DIIN6 SOPPLIBB e
' t7 IOE5T9 GUNNEL BROS. MACH MDVING $1.590.52 SPACE RENTAL 1-19A
108980 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $1.313.09 PAINT SUPPLIES
100982 W. H. EBERT CORP. 9.748.00 CONSTRUCTION 5-35-1 �IAr6rvy r� •[
106983 ELECTRO-TEST. INC. $976.00 ELECTRIC REPAIRS
188985 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. 5551.00 LAG SAMPLES
108986 JOSE PN EVANS 110,000.0E DEFERRED COMP ]INDECENCY W/D
109998 DODGE CONSTRUCTION NEWS $114.00 ADVERTISING
100989 FACILITIES SUPPORT CO. - 3577.74 ELECTRIC FABTS
9n m1 i AI_LE"
108991. JOHN B. FALKENSTEIN P.E. $5,605.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 1-7-4, 3-204-17
108992 FARP SALES S SERVICE $996.38 E.ECI'MIC PARTS
P..A rrnrnRp
108994 FERRELLG4S 157.31 PROPANE
108995 CHENWEST. INC. S158.95 NECHANICAL SUPPLIER
t`.
e N
I FUND NO 9199 J7 DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE S/23/9C PAGE 3
W REPORT NUMBER AP43
CLAIMS PAID 08/29/90 POSTING DATE 08/29/90
109996 FISHER CONSTRUCTION CO. .635D.00 PUBLICATION
10899 FOUNTAIN'VALLEY CAMERA S1.419.687 v
I08999 FOUNTAINVALLEY PAINT 9357.43
315543 6-05 - 8AT81'Y BOPPLTES ,-YYrr1
----
109001 CITY OF FRESNO $515.34 MEEIING REIMBURSEMENT
109002 A.F. FREY $105.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
1 09004 6EpEpAL TELEPHONE CO. f7.412.60 `1'81.8PBDNE EPJtVICEB
IMTI 109005 6EOFON. IXC. $6.318.09 ENGINEERING SERVICES D15T 5 y
n 109007 DON GREEK 6 ASSOCIATES f4.342.50 SURVEY SERVICES US 68-72
109008 HACH COMPANY 31,952.12 LAB SUPPLIES
a '1 309030 MApR IN6TON INDUSTRIAL vLAS TICS 3128.]3 PLUMBING PARTS
3 109p11 HATCH f KIRK. INC. $2.002.82 :r MECHANICAL PARTSGOMPUTER PAR?
'
' 109013 HILTI. INC. t4.342.76 HARDWARE
' J0 109024 DONALD 0. MONOMICHL $30D.00 DEFERRED CON? DISTRIBUTION
109016 MOUSE OF BATTERIES $2.001.23 BATTEXIRB=
109017 R.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. $315.25 PAINT SUPFLIBB
f— 109R19 HUNTINGTON SUPPLY 99.54 HARDWARE
tv 109020 IMD INDUSTRIES - $1.119.70 INSTRUMENT PARTS
y W 109022 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $63,794.13 FERROUS CHLORIDE N.0.4-11-9Q hi 'ACR DPt
v 209023 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1.201.24 CONNECTOB9 ; -A. 5 q
n 109025 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. f9.262.BI EQUIPMENT RENTAL
/P 209026 INSIDE E.P.A. WEEKLY REPORT 958.25 PUBLICATION
109028 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP. f1.176.70 JARITORIAL SUPPLIER
109029 JAYS CATERING - $849.56 IffiTINQ MERGE
I 0
9C3i JOYCE OFFICE PRODUCTS $172.13 OFFICE SUPPLIES
109032 KALLEEN•S COMPUTER SUPPLIES 5949.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES
96
109131 KANER CORP", $1,333.20 TOO1$
109035 KELLY SERVICES 15.188.13 TEMPORARY SERVICES
S4RUEPEeN-5-34-2
nc 109037 KIRMERLE BROS.. INC. 5523.71 SEALS
M—'. IP9038 KING BEARING. INC. 15,353.63 MACHINE SUPPLIES
n••
109040 MEL KOEHN t1.567.50 TEMPORARY SERVICES
109041 MARTIN KORDICK. SR $3.024.95 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 5-35-I
W
C FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8123190 PAGE
.0 REPORT NUMBER AP q3COUNT' ITIOW _
GAS
°
CLAIMS PAID 08/29/90. CIS'POSTING DATE 08/29/90
WARRANT NO,
° 109n42 - L 6 C TIRE SERVICE 063.33 MORE PARTS
169044 LEEDS 6 NORTHRUP $3,756.97 MBCHAHICw FARTS
e
109045 LEWCO ELECTRIC CO. $140.55 TRUCE FARES- }A
109047 JOHN LISEE PUMPS. INC. 53.722.65 PONT PARTS
109048 LOCAL AGENCY 5750.00 I.APfO PEE
109050 MPS 51.622.18 PHOYOGRAPHIO BERVICEB
m 109051 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS. INC. f♦SS.90 2114EABICAL PACTS
... .n. r.
° G 109053 DON MAURER S♦.000.00 OCEAN STUDY
' n 109U54 MAR WELL COLORS 116.32 FHO'IYM PROCESSING
° f109D56 MCKENNA ENGR. 6 EQUIP. $8.494.06 PONTPdIT$ ;,;: s•,ies
31,09157 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. S141.47 EASOWAIE +n* �Iye aT[.
0 109C59 MEDLIN CONROLS CO. f90.5B PLUMBING SUPPLIES
' CO 109060 TNOMAS R. IELTON 5286.37 MILEAGE MUSE
109062 MILLAR ELEVATOR SERVICE 4472.66 " 'S=ATOR MAIWT®CH
D 109063 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO. $331.18 SAPCSY SOPPLLBB j v
�— 11216, mint Hr 1 INnT aI°Mi Ni I'n_ n)nR.nn Tvn•nmrvvi•'T - �'
f 119065 MONTROY SUPPLY CO. $41.56 HARDWARE
109066 MOTION INDUSTRIES. INC. i1.515.66 HAPDf1AP6
� PART
'Cn 109069 MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICES •"' $97.71 -:',:CN.U1�39.HP90YE SERVICS.'
109069 NATIONAL LUMBER $390.42 HARDWARE ••+•
Inon)n e.mw v hme
Pm 109071 GUST M. NEWBERG CONST. CO. 62.D54.463.62 CONSTRUCTION PI-33
c--1 109072 NEWARN ELECTRONICS $24.16 INSTRUMENT SOPPLIEB
R n
109074 O.M.S./SOLAG DISPOSAL CO $4.165.00 TRASH BINSCE
": ml
109075' . OR SYSTEMS CO. f68.721.93 CHLORINE M.0.2-14-90
C�q cB u .0I3R_I0
10a171 ORAN 3T.15 i HE==112
KJ 10907A ORANGE COAST HARDWOOD 6 5912.63 BUILDING MATERIAIS
hV 109080 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. $1.836.02 CHBNICALB
309081 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY CO. $114.89 GROW COVER-
9Oa) R...I W.IVE_s c.TrTu
109063 OXYGEN SERVICE 6:03:76 SPECIALTY GAGES
109984 COUNTY OF ORANGE f950 OG NAPPING SERVICES
109086 ROBERI L. CITRON $150.00 D67ERED COMP - PICKLER
JOSS87 P.J. RAOCLIFFE S SONS • s2B0.00 CWSUTLING SERVICES
C7 FUND NO 9299 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE '8/23190 PAGE 5
1
LIT REPORT NUMBER AP43
T CLAIMS PAID 06/29/90 POSTING DATE 08/29/90
109088 PSI $205.38 TRUCK PARTS
109090 'PESI $273.55 TD BE89IC$7,t! 7
109091 PACIFIC PARTS - 31.167.5E I06TBBOff1'P PAH1'S T }`+
109093 PACIFIC BELL s6T 7.59 TELEPHONE SERVICE
109094 PACIFIC TRUCK EQUIPMENT S206.81 TROCH PART
n 109096 PEAT. MARWICK. MAIN 6 CO. 65.000.00 AUDITING SERVICES M.0.3-9-88'
IT,
q0Y PEN OEP Gp AFT $445.00 : DEPeRREp COMP DISTRIBUTION :^.
�.
° O 109099 POLYPURE. INC. S23.701.44 POLYNIES M.0.1-10-90,E-9-89
3. 109100 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. S54I.82 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
4 109202 POWER TRAIN INDUSTRIES $727.69 SA7RTg SUPPL12G �q
' ITT. 109103 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE 4144.00 ' .ICE mU^qr,,._
109105 PUBLIC TELEPHONE S250.88 TELEPHONE SYSTEM
W 1091D6 OHS. INC. S21780.00 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
WEIR`
6803'
U 10910E REMEDY TEMP " . $2,426.49 TElPDHARF BItcl '! � y R',q +"S1t yN
1 4 D 109109 REMOTE METER RESETTING SYSTEM $3.000.00 �` POSTAGE e„ g" T t e h1 1.
R. U iir
tosua .w w .
° f- 10911L THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. 5862.2E PLUMBING SUPPLIES
v 109112 ROACH WATER TECHNOLOGY, INC. S231.18 BOILER PART
P
(/1 109114 J. R. pOOBERTSR $306.021.31 CONSTRUCTION J-17
109115 ET ,s4;S190
a r4 109117 ROSEMOUNT/UNILDC S247.57 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
..� 109118 MICHAEL ROZENGURT $1.116.44 MEETING MUSE
109120 SANCON ENGINEERING . INC. - $533.272.50 - CONSTRUCTION 3-33R t > '�
109122 SCHULER ENGINEERING CORP. $273.611.44 CONSTRUCTION P1-27-162
T 12 SE C 45T OE IGNS 6336 AFPTGR AWNIPS
4E9I 109123 SEWER EQUIP. CO. OF AMERICA S169.90 MACHINE PARTS
109124 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $388.92 TOOLS
° 109126 SLIDE RASTER $226.50 SLIDES
109127 SMITH-EMERY CO. S2.570.00 SOIL TESTING N.0.6-14-09
PLUMBING-6UPP61ES
209229 SOFT WAREHOUSE. WESTERN REGION 3349.56 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
109130 SOFT WAREHOUSE $116.76 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
SOLAR-TURBINES--IMSGRRDRAZE^ 6"^ A MA
109132 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. ' $419.715.91 POWER
109133 g0. CAL. GAS CO. 61.334.27 NATURAL GAS
n
O FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/23/90 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP45
Jl
CLAIRE PAID 08/29190, POSTING DATE 08/29/90
109134 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $16.694.55 DIESEL FUEL
' 209136 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO..INC. - *269.30 INSTR@¢NI`PARS
10 109137 STAMEN Z. SPASSOFFT P.E. '$3.000.00 ENCINEEBIAO BBQVICES 81-34 2 i ^x i"
109139 STAR TOOL E SUPPLY CO. $161.72 TOOLS
109140 STERLING ART $195.88 ART SUPPLIES
° n 109142 SUN-BELT LANDSCAPE S RAINY. $3.547.40 CORrU=C CR00NDSmmw G tl O B-949ol
yln 109143 SUNSET FORD $93.65 TRUCK PARTS
° 109145 SUPER CHER CORP $371.87 CNENICALS
' n - 109196 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL. INC. $2.281.27 TOOLS
° 109198 TAUS E0. ELECTRONICS - 5970.05 BATTERIES
fTl 109199 TAYLOR-DUNN G159.62 ELELTBIC CART PARIS • V
..
yrrmwyrAi
109151 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD $5.057.52 RENTAL BODIPMEMI
O
109152 THA/NORCAL S446.00 LAB SERVICES
I 109254 TILLINGHAST [ S1'.239.00 - CONSOLMG SERVICES - RISK ANALYSI66 '
109155 MY-6 LOCK f SAFE SERVICE ,"t �'0196 ;3 ZBETr. n S
r 109157 TRUCK A AUTO SUPPLY, INC. SL.6I1.75 TROCR PARTS
109158 TRUCKYARC $327.25 TRUCK PARTS
.. N.. 109160 UNION SIGN CO. - f182 78 ED
SIGNS
° 309161 UNITED CONCRETE COMPANIES 1161.70 CONCRETE !i;Cdr
109163 VWR SCIENTIFIC $3.632.67 LAB SUPPLIES
309169 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $7.720.66 PIPE 6 FITTINGS -
Eii BOND, am
OCI
nI
109166 VAN LEEUYEN PIPE B TUBE SBY3.6B
109167 VAREC DIVISION - E7.393.59 MECHANICAL PARTSCLr
, . s- ,...
SEEING
109169 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 9935.26 SAFETY SUPPLIES
109170 CARL WARREN A CO. f20B.95 INSURANCE CLAIMS AID(INISTRAT08
109172 YELLS FARGO GUARD SERVICE $2.310:81 SECURITY SERVICES
109173 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY - $63.256.08 CAUSTIC SODA N.0.8-8-89
109175 VILCON IND. 3153.41 INSTRUMENT PART
109176 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES *I 1486.97 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3-24
109178 %-TREE CO. f159.38 COMPUTER SOPYNABE
1091 T9 XER O% CO0.P. $2.550.00 COPIER LEASES
CTl
I FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING GATE 8/23/90 PAGE ]
V
REPORT NUMBER AP93
._ CLAIMS PAID 08/29/90 POSTING DATE 08/29/90
° 109180 GEORGE YARDLEY COMPANY $805.16 VALVES
.
° 209189 ZIEBARTN -AND ALPER S572.009.15 - CONSTSOCTI08.P2-37
: s
109103 RICNARD.O. EDGAR - 5200.00 DEFEARBD CM VISTRIBUSI",
_ TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 08/29/90 $9.165.070.85
01 w PAC FUND 0 1,095.63
I 02 CAP FAX POND .. :. 2.221.65' h.i`• R ".:sf{° Fy' .....+ry '
13 Den FOND 575.869.97
05 OVER FORD 5,721.55
15 CAP PAC FORD 244.631.26
1
: 07 OPER FORD
07.CAP FAC FUND - 50:999.69
014 CAP PAC FOND 142,608.22
1566 OPER FUND 2,483.93
/667 OPER FOND . 9
- 07614 OVER PUN11 3.91919.69. ray.��-5x �I•%: '} i 3�.?�'d„�,�,, , '
XORF 7,027,301.19
SELF FORDED WORKERS ow INSURANCE 12.781.29
i 9,185,070.85
4a
Fc
Fes,
1 ,
p
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 FrT S AVENUE
F0UNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANCE ORDER
C.O. NO. One (1)
CONTRACTOR: P. R. BURKE INDUSTRIAL CORP. DATE September 12, 1990
JOB: INSTAr.I.ATTON OF REPLACEMENT IwmLUM METERS, JOB NO. J-24
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (DadacL) $ 18,227.37
In accardance With contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as cmpensation therefor, the
following additionne to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 REPIACEMENP OF CONCENTRIC REDUCERS AT MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK FIOR ETER AT
PLANT 2
The Contractor was directed to replace two 60-inch x 42-inch concentric reducers
and two 42-inch flexible couplings at the Miller-Holder Trunk peter. The
contract specifies that the existing reducers and couplings at the Miller-Holder
Trunk are to be reused when the new flowmeter is installed. Hanever, the
Districts have experienced trouble in the past when working on the evicting
Miller-Holder flcumeter. The existing couplings have a lay distance of
arrroximtely 12 inches and they cannot be moved more than 8 inches in
either direction because of interference from the existing reducers or the
existing flo meter. The existing couplings, specifier) in the contract to be
reused, cannot be renoved without cutting the coupling's sleeve. Districts'
personnel have also reported that the existing reducers have been nudi.fied to
have a non-standard outside diameter. This prevents the use of a new mndified
coupling with a lay distance shorter than 8 inches. The Contractor would be
required to confimm the diameter of the reducers which would require shut down
of the Miller-Holder Tnink, disassembly and reassembly of the fittings, and
another shut dawn after the couplings are nndified to install the new flavmeter.
This item of work includes the purchase and installation of two new concentric
reducers and two new 42-inch couplings that will allow the future removal of the
flawneters to be performed without damaging the couplings. This item also
includes the supply of two 12-inch couplings for installation in the College
Avenue Pimp Station. The negotiated cost for this item does not include any
bypass pumping which may be required to cmplete the additional work.
Operations has indicated that bypass pumping may be required for a shutdown of
mouse than four hours. Bypass pumping would be aocmplished by Contractor's
force account and included in a future change order if it is necessary to
prevent a possible sewage spill. This item was negotiated with the Contractor
pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 001
PCH003)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 16,947.63
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
E-1"" AGENDA ITEM #9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS E-1"
(.OWrY caurrnmrON DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 WT S AVENUE
EWNMN VALLEY, CLLTFURNTa 92708 l _.
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. One (1)
CONTRACIM: P. R. BUREE INDUSTRIAL CORP. DATE September 12, 1990
JOB: TN.41'ATIMON OF REPLACEMENT INFLUENT METERS, JOB NO. J-24
Item 2 IIISTA ZMCN OF 1aCRO-DCI CQ-TUPER AT PLANT 1
The contract provides for the installation of a Districts' furnished NICRO-DCI
ccuputer at Plant 2. The installation of the Districts' furnished MICRO-DCI
cuter at Plant 1 was planned to be performed in the contract for the
construction of the new Control Center (J-23-2). However, the new Control
Center is not expected to be cmpleted prior to Nay of 1991. This item of work
is for the installation of the ccuputer in the existing Control Center for use
until it can be moved to the new facility. This item was negotiated with the
Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions.
(Reference: PCH 002)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,279.74
TIME EXTENSION TRIS CHAFE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOM ADDED COST TEIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 18,227.37
TOTAL TIME EXMNSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 0 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original.
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required
for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential
costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor,
except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CORn= TIME
Original Contract Date February 27, 1990
Original Contract Time 180 Calendar Days
Original Coupletion Date August 25, 1990
Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Time Extension 0 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Tice 180 Calendar Days
Revised Final Canpleti.on Due Date No Change
Actual Final Cmpletion Date Not Applicable
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $214,464.00 ` 1
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00 h.✓
This Change (Add) (peduek) $ 18,227.37
Amended Contract Price $ 232,691.37
"E-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-2"
COMM SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORAN(E OOUNIT Page 3 of 3
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 E6LIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIEOR M 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. One (1)
CONTRAC.1CR: P. R. BURGE INDUSTRIAL CORP. DATE September 12, 1990
JOB: INSTALIATION OF REPIFffi.ffiNf INFLUENT METERS, CONTRWT NO. J-24
Board Authorization Date: September 12, 1990
COUNM SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORHIA
SUBMI•iaD Y•
90
Engineer Date ConetructTo ;�Dltl
AS TO RM:
Director of Engineering Date General Damsel Date
P. R. RMOR INDUSTRIAL CpRP,
ACCEPTED 7 '
Contracb= Data
"E-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Four (4)
CONTRACTOR: Gust K. Newberg Construction Co. DATE Septem er 990
JOB: PRIMARY CLARIFIERS NOS. 6-15 AND RELATED FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION
PLANTNO. 1, JOBN -3
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Peduet) $ 87,272.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 - WSSPS PUMP MODIFICATIONS
The Contractor was directed to add supports to the four pumps in the two
temporary Waste Sidestream Pump Stations built under this project. These
supports were necessary for normal pump operations and were not shown on the
contract drawings. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor
pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 10,
GKN 370-20).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 1,955.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 - CONDUCTOR ADDITIONS ON SCRUBBER FAN MOTOR
The contract specifications requires the scrubber fan motor to have two speeds.
The contract plans did not include an adequate amount of conductors for the
required two-speed motors. The Contractor was directed to furnish and install
the required additional conductors. This item of work was negotiated with the
Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions.
(Reference: FCO 21, RFI 49, GKN 370-34).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 8 3,098.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 3 - PILE INSTALLATION AT SECONDARY EFFLUENT JUNCTION BOX NO. 3
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install 22 foundation piles at the
future location of the secondary effluent junction box (SEJB) No. 3. SEJB No. 3
will be constructed as part of a future project and will be located over the two
108-inch RCP pipes constructed on this project. The 22 precast concrete piles
were installed before and below the installation of the 108-inch pipe. The
piles were installed as a part of this project to eliminate the possibility of
future damage to the referenced pipe line from pile driving operations. At the
bid date of this project (P1-33) the design of the future project (P1-36) had
just started. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to _
Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 3, GKN 370-8).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: E 56,450.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"F-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(b) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Four (4)
CONTRACTOR: Gust K. Newberg Construction Co. DATE September 12, 1990
JOB: PRIMARY CLARIFIERS NOS. 6-15 AND RELATED FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION
PLANT N J B N0. P -3
Item 4 - SCUM GALLERY WALL MODIFICATIONS
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install additional PVC liner and
water stop in the south wall of the scum gallery walls. These walls will be
an integral part of the future clarifiers. The PVC liner and waterstop were not
shown on the plans and specifications and were required to protect the walls
from future corrosive gases and to insure the water tightness of the gallery
from future flows. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor
pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference; FCO 14,
GKN 370-21).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 8 25,769.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 6 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 87,272.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 6 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that six days' extension
of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no
direct or indirect, incidental .or consequential costs, expenses, losses or
damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted
and approved by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date November 2, 1989
Original Contract Time 800 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date January 11, 1992
Time Extension this C.O. 6 Calendar Days -
Total Contract Time Extension 6 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 806 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date January 17, 1992
Actual Final Completion Date January 17, 1992
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
7-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(b) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3 .
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Five (5)
CONTRACTOR: Gust K. Newberg Construction Co. DATE Septem
JOB: PRIMARY CLARIFIERS NOS. 6-15 AND RELATED FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION
PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. Pl-33 additional work contained within this Change Order can not be performed
Incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 8 days, extension
of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no
direct or indirect, incidental or consequential casts, expenses, losses or
damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted
and approved by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date November 2, 1989
Original Contract Time - 800 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date January 11, 1992
Time Extension this C.O. 8 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 14 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 814 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date January 25, 1992
Actual Final Completion Date January 25, 1992
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 39,657,000.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 175,2350
This Change (Add) (9edee8) $ 60
Amended Contract Price $ 40,440,35 0
"G-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(b) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Five (5)
CONTRACTOR: Gust K. Newberg Construction Co. DATE Sept eem rr , 1990
JOB: PRIMARY CLARIFIERS NOS. 6-15 AND RELATED FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION
PLANT . 1. JOB NO. PI-33
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (9edust) $ 608,121.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 - PIPING ADDITION FOR ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICTS
The Contractor is directed to furnish and install additional supply and return
piping for Orange County Water District (OCWO). This extra work is associated
with bid item No. 4 of this project and is required by OCWD for their ultimate
future design of the supply and return pipelines between the Districts and OCWO.
This item involves the addition of four pipelines to an area within this project.
The first pipeline is an extension of 280 feet to the contract-specified 48-inch
cement mortar lined steel pipeline at the northeast corner of the primary
clarifiers. The second pipeline is approximately 710 feet of ductile iron pipe
and is required for the addition of a new waste brine line from OCWD located
just south of the existing brine line. The existing brine line was shown on the
contract plans to be abandoned due to a location conflict with contract-
specified piping but was needed by OCWD to continue normal water treatment
operations. Due to the different construction stages required for installation
of both the contract specified 108-inch RCP and the new 24-inch ductile iron
pipe brine line, an additional 900 feet of temporary 12-inch PVC pipe was
required to minimize OCWO shutdown. Also inccuded in this item is the addition
of approximately 440 feet of 24-inch DIP located under the north perimeter road
between OCWD and the Waste Sidestream Pump Station (WSSP). This pipeline is a
replacement gravity sewer from OCWD's facilities and includes the installation
of a 72-inch metering manhole and all associated electrical requirements.
All costs associated with this extra work included in this item will be
reimbursed to the Orange County Sanitation Districts by OCWD. This item of work
was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the
General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 7, GKN 370-29).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 608,121.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 8 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 608,121.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 8 Calendar Days
"G-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(b) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3 .
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Five (5) `.rJ
CONTRACTOR: Gust K. Newberg Construction Co. DATE September 12, 1990
JOB: PRIMARY CLARIFIERS NOS. 6-15 AND RELATED FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION
PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-33
The additional work contained within this Change Order can not be performed
Incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 8 days' extension
of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no
direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or
damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted
and approved by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date November 2, 1989
Original Contract Time 800 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date January 11, 1992
Time Extension this C.O. 8 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 14 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 814 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date January 25, 1992
Actual Final Completion Date January 25, 1992
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 39,657,000.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 175,235.00
This Change (Add) (Bedust) $ 608,121. 0
Amended Contract Price $ 40,440,356.00
"G-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(b) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
�j FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Five (5)
CONTRACTOR: Gust K. Newberg Construction Co. DATE Septem er 2, 99
JOB: -PRIMARY CLARIFIERS NOS. 6-15 AND RELATED FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION
PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P -3
Board Authorization Date: September 12, 1990
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
SUBMITT BY: RE ND
J tJ 20 ,o
Engineer TonTtructiorr MaKarqer Date
APP 0 BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
O.S. by Thomas L Woodruff
irec or oEngineering f 6ate General Counsel Date
GUST K. NEWBERG CONSTRUCTION COMPANY APPROVED BY ORANGE COUNTY WATER
DISTRICT FOR OCWD RELAT CHANGE
ACCEP BY% : ORDER WORC
9° 2e-s,
Contractor ate is Mills, r. ate
General Manager
"G-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(b) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-3"
ODIIIPIY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 6
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 BGLIS AVENUE
FOMMIN VALLEY, CAIZEU NIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Fair (4)
CONTRACTOR: Pdvanco Constructors, Division of DATE September 12, 1990
Zurn Constructor's, Inc.
JOB: SLUDGE HATIDT—TNG FACTIJTIES AT HKIA MON PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-2.
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Dacluct) $ 58,066.57
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract cork are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions frcm. the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 - DUDIFY TRENCH COVERS AT STANDBY GENERATOR INSTAI.IATICN
The thickness of the stainless steel thread plate called out for use at the
stay generator cable trench is 5/8-inch. Stainless steel tread plate,
hamever, is manufactured in 1/4-inch thickness only. This change order item
provides for the fabrication of the trench covers utilizing the 1/4-inch thick
plate. Because of the reduced tread plate thickness and its inability to span
the cable trench without excessive deflection, stainless steel angles will be
welded to the underside of the 1/4-inch thick plate to eliminate deflection.
Although the tread plate thickness is reduced by this change order item, the
Added cost is for the addition of support members and for the welding of same to
the underside of the 1/4-inch plate. The net cost of this item of work was
negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General
Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,187.21
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 - WDIF'ICATION AND RELOCATION OF ACCESS IADDER IN TMHM 10
In Tunnel No. 10 at intersection Q near the dissolved air flotation treatment
building an existing access ladder interfered with the installation of the new
24" plant water line. The ladder was not shown on the contract drawings. To
eliminate the interference the contractor was instructed to modify the access
].adder and relocate it in a position that would not interfere with any new, or
existing utilities or equipment. Work was accomplished by contractor's force
account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. .
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,967.58
TINE EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days u
"H-1'" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-1"
CO= CLNTTMON DISTRICTS OF ORANGE CXAIINt7 Page 2 of 6
P. O. BDX 8127 - 10844 EF.T.rc AVENUE
EOTa7 UR VALTEY, CALIEURKIA 92708
CHANCE ORDER
C. O. NO. Four (4)
C( : Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE September 12, 1990
Zurn Constructors, Inc.
JOB: SLUDGE HANDLING FACn.' MS AT RECLADV=ON PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-2.
Item 3 - EXPfMATUA1' POTHOLING
The contractor potholed the work site in areas of new construction to verify the
location of existing utilities and underground improvements shown on the plans
as required by the contract. When excavation started after the required
potholing, other undisclosed utilities were encountered. The contractor was
then directed to perform additional potholing in order to locate any other
undisclosed utilities which might interfere with and delay the work. The
additional work was performed by Contractors force account pursuant to Section
10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 9,952.00
TIME'EXTENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 4 - PIPE ENCASEMERM UNDER PILE SUPPORTED STRUCIURES
The contract drawings detailed two types of underground pipe encasements. One
detail was provided for a typically encased pipeline under a earth supported
structure and the other a pipeline encasement that was to be connected to and
supported by the structure base slab of a building erected on foundation piles.
The encasement detail called out for use at pipelines under the pile supported
Plant Water Pump Station and the Sludge Storage Facility and Truck Loading
Facility was that used for pipelines under conventional earth supported
structures. This change order item provides for the construction of underground
pipeline encasements at the structures referenced above where additional
concrete, formwork and reinforcing steel was required. Cost of this change
order item was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of
the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 7,404.56
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"H-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(C) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-2"
COUNTY SANITAmTCN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 6
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELT•TR AVENUE
FoLu TA11i VALLEY, Cmal aura 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Four (4)
CMMAC CR: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE September 12. 1990
Zurn Constructors, Inc.
JCB: SLUDGE HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-2.
Item 5 - INSTALL BAIT, VALVES ON HIGH PRESSURE AIR LINES AT PNEUMAMC OPERATORS
Ball valves used to isolate the high pressure air (HPA) supply at pneumatically
controlled valves for the sludge cake loading pumps were provided for in the
contract documents. Although it was to have the same isolation valves provided
at the pneumatically operated valves for the sludge cake transfer pumps the ball
(isolation) valves were inadvertently omitted fran the details. This change
• order its provides for the installation of ball valves at the EPA connections
to the pneumatically controlled valves at the sludge cake transfer pumps to
provide a means to isolate the HPA supply at pneumatic operators at which
maintenance or repair operations are perforaied. Cost for this item of work was
negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10-6-(b) (2)A of the General
Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE CRDER MEW $ 6,131.09
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 6 - TEMPORARY SUPPORT OF AND MODIFICATIONS TO FfTRRIATE LINE
The filtrate line that existed between the Belt Press Building and the influent
structure for circular Clarifiers 1 and 2 was shown to be demolished along with
circular Clarifier No. 1, the Orange County Water District brine line, and
several other existing utilities and structures. The demolition of the filtrate
line canld not take place with the other utilities and structures as it had to
neoain in service until new Junction Box "B" was completed and operational and
the new 24" filtrate system to Junction Box "B" was completed. Maintenance of
this process line was not addressed in the specifications. The location of the
existing filtrate line (as-built) was within the excavation for the new Sludge
Storage and Truck Loading Facility and it also passed through the location of
new Jurmtion Box "C". Considerations were given to rerouting the line around
the excavation of the critical Sludge Facility and Junction Box "C" but proved
too costly and the reroute would have caused other interferer es. It was
determined by staff that the line be mainramed in place and that the portion of
the line interfering with Junction box "C" be modified to clear the new
structure.. Work was performed by contractor's force account pursuant to
Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 18,758.11
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"H-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORAL COUNTY Page 4 of 6
P. O. BME 8127 - 10844 RTT.TS AVENUE
EaIIi1T.IN VALLEY, CAISE H IIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. Four (41
CONTRACTOR: Pdvanco Constructors, Division of DATE Seatemhgr 12, 1990
Zurn Constructors, Inc.
JOB: SLUDGE HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECIAKWION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-2.
It®m 7 - REPAIR 4-INCH NATURAL GAS LIME AND R1=ATE NEW CHANGE COUNTY WATER
DISTRICT ELECTRICAL MANHOLE AT JUNCTION BOX "B"
During the excavation for the new Orange County Water District (OCWD) electrical
manhole in the vicinity of new Junction Box "B" the contractor daunged a 4-inch
natural gas line that was not shown on the plans. In addition to uncovering and
damaging the gas line the contractor uncovered an abandoned 42" reinforced con-
crete pipeline that interfered withathe New OCWD electrical nanhole. This
change order item provides for the repair of the 4" natural gas line and for a
minor change in the location of the new OCWD electrical nenhole to eliminate the
interference with the abandoned RCP. Work was performed by contractor's force
, count dv,rsuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)b of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,930.20
TIME EXM4SION THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 8 - FLEXIBLE PIPE COUPLING RESTRAINT CHANGES
A schedule provided in the contract drawings details the amount and size of the
tie rods that will be required to restrain a flexible coupling in a ductile iron
pipeline (DIP) . The schedule lists the size and quantities of the rods for
couplings installed in pipelines developing up to 24,000 pounds of thrust at the
coupling. Test pressures for 20-inch, 24-inch, and 30-inch plant water lines
develop thrust pressures of 50,000 pounds and over. This change order item
provides for the increase in size and number of the rods required to restrain
flexible coupling joints for sizes listed above. Cost for this change order
item was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the
General Provisions. A credit was provided by the contractor for the rods of
size and quantity listed in the schedule for nexi= thrust conditions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,735.82
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL COST THIS.CFI ORDER: $ 58,066.57
TOTAL TIME E)M NSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
"H-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(C) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-4"
OIXINPY SANITAMON DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 6
P. 0. BM 8127 - 10844 Ef.T,TC AVENUE
FUM- E LN VALLEY, CUXECEMA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. Four (4)
CCTnRAC=: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE September 12, 1990
Zurn Constructors, Inc.
JOB: SLUDGE HANDT.Tnr. FACILITIES AT RKMA MOM PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-2.
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidwrtal to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required
for this Change order, and no direct or incl ract, incidental or consequential
costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor,
except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order.
Sun-pm OF CONTRACT TIM
Original Contract Date August 1, 1989
Original Contract Time 600 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date March 23, 1991
Time Extension This c.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Time Extension 0 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 600 Calendar Days
Revised Ccupletion Date March 23, 1991
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 19,085,600.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 269,955.17
This Change (Add) (eaduet) $ 58,066.57
Amended Contract Price $ 19,413,621.74
"H-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS °H-5"
COMP SAHITP.7 CN DISTRICM OF CRVIGE COWN Page 6 of 6
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 EC,T.•TR AVENGE
FOWAM VALLEY, CiCal7MeM 92708
CBANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. Four (4)
CONTP:ACTCR: Advanco Constructnrs, Division of DATE September 12, 1990
Zurn Constructors, Inc.
JOB: MDGE DANDLING FACILMEc AT Fd=A MCN PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-2.
Board Authorization Date: September 12, 1990
COLWrY SANlT mrCN DLSMCTS CF
MW4M COONIY, affiU R<II'A
BY•
�Z/gyp U1 Biz//J�
Efigineer Date Construction Date
71 BY: APPAAVBD AS M FCR4:
Director of Engineering Date Cenral Counsel Date
ADVR= C26MCTC16, DIVISION OF
z[m cmonuLTmzs, INC. .
ACCEPTED BY:
gwQO
C a Date
"H-6" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-6"
i
f
RESOLUTION NO. 90-117
APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT �..�
WITH GORDON W. HOYT TO A SI T IN
NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH SCE
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH GORDON W. HOYT TO ASSIST STAFF
IN NEGOTIATING A RATE STRUCTURE AGREEMENT WITH
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY RE CENTRAL
POWER GENERATION SYSTEMS AT PLANTS 1 AND 2
WHEREAS, the Districts are in the process of installing Central Power
Generation Systems at Plants 1 and 2 that will utilize digester gas, a
by-product of the sewage treatment process, as a fuel to generate electricity to
operate the treatment plants; and,
WHEREAS, because of the changeover from Southern California Edison Company
(SCEC) power to self-generated power, it is necessary to negotiate a rate
structure contract with SCEC which may also include provisions for a back-up
power supply from SCEC, appropriate credits for capacity and energy produced by
the Central Power Generation Systems and for sale of surplus energy generated by
the Districts' systems; and,
WHEREAS, it is deemed desirable to obtain the services of a consultant
with expertise in negotiating such contracts to assist staff and General Counsel
in negotiating said rate structure agreement with Southern California Edison
Company.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the Professional Services Agreement dated September 12,
1990, by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13
"I-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "I 1"
and 14 of Orange County and Gordon W. Hoyt, providing for specialized consulting
engineering and negotiating services to assist staff in negotiating a rate
structure agreement with Southern California Edison Company in connection with
the Districts' new Central Power Generation Systems at Plants 1 and 2, is hereby
approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized at the
rate of $100.00 per hour, plus out-of-pocket expenses, for a total amount not to
exceed $50,000.00, to accordance with the provisions set forth in said
agreement; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for
itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the
General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1990.
"I-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 90-118
PERTAINING TO THE PROCEDURE FOR DESTRUCTION OF
OBSOLETE RECORDS AND REPEALING THE INCONSISTENT
PROVISIONS F ALL OTHER RESOLUTIONS PREVIOUSLY
ADOPTED BY THESE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS WITH
RESPECT TO DESTRUCTION OF OBSOLETE RECORDS
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
PERTAINING TO THE PROCEDURE FOR DESTRUCTION OF
OBSOLETE RECORDS AND REPEALING THE INCONSISTENT
PROVISIONS OF ALL OTHER RESOLUTIONS PREVIOUSLY
ADOPTED BY THESE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS WITH RESPECT
TO DESTRUCTION OF OBSOLETE RECORDS
WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish procedures for the destruction of
•
obsolete records to facilitate the orderly handling of business by the Joint
Administrative Organization of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California; and,
WHEREAS, these Boards are authorized by the provisions of Government Code
Sections 60200 through 60204 to destroy records under certain conditions; and,
WHEREAS, it is desirable and appropriate to authorize the destruction of
records on a routine basis that have been retained for a certain period of time,
that are copies of originals on file with the Districts or that have been
microfilmed.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1: Authorization for Destruction of Records
The destruction of certain records, papers and documents is hereby -
"J-1" AGENDA ITEM #2(f) - ALL DISTRICTS
authorized, pursuant to Government Code Sections 60200 at seg., after such
records have been retained for the minimum time set forth in Exhibit °A°,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 2: Destruction of Records after Microfilming
Any record not expressly required by law to be filed and preserved may be
destroyed at any time after it is microfilmed in conformance with the
requirements of Government Code Section 60203. -
Section 3: Destruction of Duplicates
Pursuant to Government Code Section 60200, any duplicate record, paper, or
document, the original or a permanent photographic copy of which is in the files
of any office or department of the District, may be destroyed after confirmation
by the District Secretary that such original or permanent photographic copy
remains on file in the District.
Section 4: Retention of Records Not Mentioned
All records, papers and documents not mentioned in this resolution shall be
retained indefinitely.
Section 5: Rescission of Conflicting Resolutions
All other resolutions, or portions thereof, in conflict herewith are hereby
rescinded and made of no further effect.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1990.
"J-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-4"
�N
PAGE 1
RECORD NUMBER OF YEARS FOLLOHING COMPLETION AFTER WN ICH RECORD MAY BE DESTROYED
Board Operations A Technical
Administration Secretary's Personnel Finance Maintenance Services Engineering
Department Office Department Department Department Department Department
Accounts Receivable Customer Dead Files 2
to
n Agenda A Supporting Material For Board of 2 2 X
Directors' Meetings, other than approved H
Minutes, Resolutions and Ordinances H
2 2 2 2 2 2
Agenda Item Submittals H
n _
Agreements with Cities, Agencies and 2
Indi"duals r•
rl a
a Annexation informs tion 3
.1
;t o
� Annual Financial Reports from Auditors 2 �
h
Annual Maintenance Reports 2 m
O
I Annual Reports re Districts' Operations 2 2 2 2 0
C
D AQMD (SCAOMD) Files, except for files 3
r "
r— containing Permits vIth Conditions In Force 3 3 3 3 O
Z
t7 Audit Reports 2 2 0
Backup Computer Tapes, Program Disks and 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
%o Computer Records o
Bidders' Proposals a Quotes (Successful 2 2
(� Bidders) `-
Budgets (Annual) and Budget Worksheets 2 2
Calibration Records 2
Cash Floweter Readings 7
Cash Receipts Reports A Backup and 2
Deposit Orders
W
I
PAGE 2
RECORD NUMBER OF YEARS FOLLOWING COMPLETION AFTER WHICH RECORD MAY BE DESTROYED
Board Operations & Technical
Administration Secretary's Personnel Finance Maintenance Services Engineering
Department Office Department Department Department Department Department
n City Water Meter Readings 2 X
t l Collection System Problem Report Forms 2 H
z bd
y Conductivity Charts 2 y
-i Confined Space Entry Permits 2 y'
3 Construction Contract Files, including 2 2 N
plans and specifications and grant files,
when applicable, except for easements y
and permits O
Consultant Qualification Files 2 2 to
t7
Contracts (Mist.) 2 pr
nControl Center Logs S H
p Conflict of Interest Statements filed by x
Directors and Designated Staff 2 2
Cost Allocation Reports 2
CPT and IBM PC Disks 2 2 2 2 2 `p
.� o
Cn Daily Field and Activity Logs 2
Y
Directors' Compensation and Mileage Records 4 4 m
Directors' Special Committee Files 2
Districts' Warrant Copies and Backup 4
Docbar Reports 2
Drivers' Inspection Reports 2
PAGE 3
RECORD NUMBER OF YEARS FOLLOWING COMPLETION AFTER WHICH RECORD MAY BE DESTROYED
Board Operations E Technical
Administration Secretary's Personnel Finance Maintenance Services Engineering
Department Office Department Department Department Department Department
pl
D Environmental Impact Reports. Initiated by 2 9
nT
CSOOO m
O Environmental Impact Reports. Initiated by 2 y
n others
a
.� Elevator Permits 2 yl
nT
3 Emergency Overtime Reports 2
Employee Time Records 2 2 0
Equipment Delivery Reports and Backup 2 [n
1 Fixed Asset Creation/Deletion 2 0
Gasoline (Fuel) Logs 2 .aHi
r 0
General Correspondence with Cities/Districts/ 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Z
O Agencies/Individuals, etc.
� 0
General Ledger a
N
(-1 Incitlant/Aetldent Reports and Lags 2 2 2 CD
Industrial and Commercial User Flies (Sample ID r
Data E Correspondence) ACTIVE COMPANIES r
om
Industrial and Commercial User Files (Sample 3
Data A Correspondence) INACTIVE COMPANIES
Insurance Claims Filed Against the Districts
and Filed By the Districts 10
Job Cost Reports 2
Job Plans (including backup materlal for 2 2 2 2
Miscellaneous Projects)
PAGE 4
RECORD NUMBER OF YEARS AFTER WHICH RECORD NAY BE DESTROYED
Board Operations & Technical
Administration Secretary's Personnel Finance Maintenance Services Engineering
Department Office Department Department Department Department Department
Job Information Status Sheets (Waster Data 2
Base) to
l Go
OJoint Operating Summary Departs < H
n Journal Entries to General Ledger and a H
Backup Budget Worksheets
D+
rTl Labor Distribution Reports 2 >
3 �
Laboratory Analytical Data 5 y0
-y, Walling List for CSDOC-Initiated EIR3 and 2 A
other documents required per CEpA Guidelines [d
m
i Management Agreements and Memoranda of 3 3 3 0
Understanding (Labor Agreements) H
r Manhole inspection Reports, Line Cleaning 2
C Videotapes and Reports Z
N Manufacturers' Nanuals G Data 2 2 2 O
Master Plans of Districts' Collection, 10
c'a Treatment and Disposal Facilities �O
� o
1
Memoranda (Miscellaneous) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 "
t•
m
Mobil Radio and Pager Log 2
Motor Pool Vehicle Report 2
Motorola Radio Equipment Records 2
Night Orders 2
NPOES (National Pollutant Discharge 2 2
Elimination System) Permit Reports re Solid
Wastes
r-
V
PAGE 5
RECORD NUMBER OF YEARS FOLLOWING COMPLETION AFTER WHICH RECORD MAY BE DESTROYED
Board Operations A Technical
Administration Secretary's Personnel Finance Maintenance Services Engineering
Department Office Department Department Department Department Department
Numeric AP/AR Invoice Copies 2
O Overtime Reports and Schedules 2 2 2 2 2 011
n Permits: `3
-From State and Local Agencies for 2
n Construction Projects
3 -From EPA, AOMD, etc. to Operate Plants 2 2 sn
-Connection Permits to Property Owners (copies)
1O Permits for Air Receivers, Boilers A Elevators 2 H
O
Personnel or Employment Records made or kept (a) In
by Employer, including application forms and to
records re hiring, promotions, demotions,
T transfers, layoff or termination, rates of
pay or other terns of compensation, and y
selection for training or apprenticeship O
t7
<n Plans and Specifications 10 Z
Planholder Lists 3 O
Plant Equipment Checklists, Logs and 2 2 2 m
Maintenance Records
Plant Operations Checklists, Logs, Worksheets, 2 2 2 �r
Records and Reports 0n
Plant Nos. I a 2 Monthly Summary of Operations a
Reports
Plant No. 2 Influent Trunkline Flow Charts 2
(a) Until employee leaves employment with the Districts plus 2 years.
(Records pertaining to employees who have filed civil rights actions
should be retained until final disposition of the charge or action.)
v
PAGE 6
RECORD NUMBER OF YEARS FOLLOWING COMPLETION AFTER WHICH RECORD MAY BE DESTROYED
Board Operations 6 Technical
Administration Secretary's Personnel Finance Maintenance Services Engineering
Department Office Department Department Department Department Department
Power (Electrical) Records for Treatment
n Plants and Pump Stations 7
Gla
z Problem Reports re stoppages, odors, etc. 2 to
H
� Professional Services Agreements with 4 (b) 4 (b) q
consultants for design work or various
studies or reports, Including copies of ?'
M completed plans, studies, reports, etc. m
3 s
Pump Station Reports and Records 2 H
�C` Purchase Orders (Department Copies) 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 O
Purchase Requisition Copies
tq
i Purchase Orders (Completed) with Purchase 2 0
A Requisitions ty
rPurchase Orders (Completed) Warehouse/Receiving 2 0
Copies
O 9
N Purchase Specification Files re Purchase of 2 2 O
y Autos, Equipment, Chemicals, Materials,
%o Supplies or Services, etc.
e
Quarterly Reports to EPA, etc. 2
cn Redevelopment Agency Files 2 2
Co
Reimbursement Agreements 10 (c) 10 (c)
Safety and Tailgate Training Records and 2 2
Reports/Summaries
SAWPA Flow Meter Charts 2
(b) Or until conclusion of litigation re contract grants and contract grant audits. ,
(c) Or until payment is completed
PAGE 7
RECORD NUMBER OF YEARS FOLLOWING COMPLETION AFTER WHICH RECORD MAY BE DESTROYED
Board Operations A Technical
Administration Secretary's Personnel Finance Maintenante Services Engineering
Department Office Department Department Department Department Department
Schedules: td
- Employee Work Schedules X
z - Maintenance Schedules 3 H
t7 - Construction Protect Schedules 2 co
n ;
Service Bulletinsrn H
2
Shift Supervisors- Log Books Y
3 5
Shop Drawings
]0
Sick Leave Records H
2 O
Sick Lease Usage Employee Log pi
2 R]
Sludge Handling and Pumping Records and O
Reports 2 O
r Solis Reports
t7 O
Spill Reports 5 2
z z
Standby Schedule and Reports O
2 '
State Of California Prevailing Rage Rates 2 e
n 2
i
State Permits for Maintenance on State Highways 2 2 r
Supplementary Records containing Employee 2 m
Information, including Basic Employment
and Earnings Records
Telephone Account Number Listing
2
Telephone and Visitor Log Book
2
Time Cards
2
r_
PAGE 8
RECORD NUMBER OF YEARS FOLLOWING COMPLETION AFTER WHICH RECORD MAY BE DESTROYED
Board Operations 8 Technical
Administration Secretary's Personnel Finance Maintenance Services Engineering
Department Office Department Department Department Department Department
y> Tool Inventories 2 pMt
ti
z Trott Information S oa
y Training Report Log 3 H
Trunk Line Operation 8 Maintenance Records 2 q
R1 and Reports r
j m
# User Fee Reports (by Parcel) 2 g
`D Unsuccessful Bidders- Proposals for 2 2 O
'T Construction Contracts and Purchasing so
Specifications M
WI
Unsuccessful Professional Services Proposals 2 r
T from firms for design projects, studies or H
r reports ti
F O
o Utility Requests/Responses 3 (d) 2
N Vehicle Check-out Reports 2 x0
Vehicle Reports to Auto Shop 2 ,m
� o
N Vendor Files, Non-current 2 (a) i
Y
Wage Table Rates 2 Ce
Warehouse Order Reports 2
Warehouse Withdrawal Farms 2
Water Data, Active and Inactive Companies 3
(d) Or until project is complete.
(a) Following expiration of Purchase Order.
t_
I
PAGE 9
RECORD NUMBER OF YEARS FOLLOWING COMPLETION AFTER WHICH RECORD MAY BE DESTROYED
Board Operations A Technical
Administration Secretary's Personnel Finance Maintenance Services Engineering
Department Office Department Department Department Department Department
West Noport (Kadane) Gas and Oil Flo
�
Records 2 >t
to
z Will-Serve Letters 3 to
n Wind Direction and Velocity Reports S H
—i Work Order Requests I 7
Frl to
3 =
p H
to O
Id
on
' r
a
I- H
- O
z
O
A
to,
n o
r0 , i
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
V.O.BOX 8127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 9272&8127
10844 ELLIS.FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 9270&7018
Abe cW� (714)962-2411
August 20, 1990
Hoard of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 2
10844 1111 is Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018
Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Pddesdtnn No. 2 to
Professional Services n^-�^=nt with Willdan Associates in
Connection with Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, Contract No.
2-26-3 and Ratella Relief Sewer, Contract No. 2-28
In accordance with the District's procedures for selection of professional
engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following
fee for Addendum No. 2 with Willdan Associates for additional design
services for Portion of Euclid Interceptor SeuIer, Contract M. 2-26-3 and
Ratel]a Relief Sever, Contract No. 2-28, on an hourly-rate basis including
labor plus overhead, direct expenses and fixed profit, in an amount not to
exceed $51,500.00.
Engineering Services, (hourly rates
including labor plus overhead
at 1708), not to exceed $43,000.00
Direct Expenses, not to exceed 4,200.00
Fixed Profit 4,300.00
ToML CCtURACT, Addcnduat No. 2, not to exceed $51,500.00
The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee
as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not
result in excessive profits for the consultant.
/s/Iry Pickler Is/James Neal
Iry Pickler James Neal
Chairman Tenn Chairman pro tem
Selection Committee Selection Committee
/s/Thomas M. Dawes
Thomas M. Dawes
Director of Engineering
Selection Ca mittee
"V AGENDA ITEM #90)(1) - DISTRICT 2 "K"
RESOLUTION NO. 90-128-2
APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH WILLDAN ASSOCIATES FOR DESIGN OF
CONTRACT NOS. 2-26-3 AND 2-28
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WILLDAN ASSOCIATES FOR
DESIGN OF PORTION OF EUCLID INTERCEPTOR SEWER,
BETWEEN BROADWAY AND ORANGETHORPE AVENUE, CONTRACT
NO. 2-26-3 (INCLUDING CITY OF ANAHEIM STREET
IMPROVEMENTS) , AND KATELLA RELIEF SEWER, BETWEEN
EUCLID STREET AND WALNUT STREET (NINTH) , CONTRACT
NO. 2-28, PROVIDING FOR ADDITIONAL DESIGN SERVICES
TO INCORPORATE CHANGES RECOMMENDED BY CALTRANS
AND THE CITIES OF ANAHEIM AND FULLERTON AND FOR
MISCELLANEOUS CHANGES RE CONTRACT NO. 2-26-3
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of
Orange County has heretofore entered into an agreement with Willdan Associates
for design and construction services required re Portion of Euclid Interceptor
Sewer, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-3 (including
City of Anaheim Street Improvements) , and Katella Relief Sewer, between Euclid -
Street and Walnut Street (Ninth) , Contract No. 2-28; and,
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to said agreement with Willdan Associates provided
for additional design services required due to changes requested by the City of
Fullerton, and design services necessary in order to provide for the abandonment
of a section of the sewer in Euclid Street in the City of Garden Grove known as
the Euclid Purchase Sewer; and,
WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend said agreement with
Willdan Associates to provide for additional design services necessary to
Incorporate changes recommended by CALTRANS and the Cities of Anaheim and
Fullerton, and for other miscellaneous changes required re Contract No. 2-26-3;
and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 2 on August 8, 1990, the Selection Committee has
negotiated and certified a fee for said services, in accordance with established
"L-1" AGENDA ITEM k9( i ) (2) - DISTRICT 2 "L-1"
procedures for the selection of professional engineering services.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Addendum No. 2 dated September 12, 1990, to that certain
Professional Services Agreement dated September 14, 1988, by and between County
Sanitation Disfrt ct No. 2 and Willdan Associates, for design and construction
services required for Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Broadway and
Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-3 (including City of Anaheim Street
Improvements) , and Katella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut
Street (Ninth) , Contract No. 2-2B, providing for additional design services
necessary to incorporate changes recommended by CALTRANS and the Cities of
Anaheim and Fullerton, and for other miscellaneous changes required re Contract
No. 2-26-3; is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased by an amount
not to exceed $51,500.00, as follows, increasing the total authorized
compensation from $145,578.50 to an amount not to exceed $197,078.50:
Existing Change per Amended
Agreement Addendum No. 2 Agreement
Professional Services
(hourly rates for labor
plus overhead at 170%) ,
not to exceed .............. $107,580.00 $ 439000.00 $150,580.00
Direct Expenses,
not to exceed ............... 19,010.00 4,200.00 23,210.00
Fixed Profit ................. 18,988.50 4,300.00 23,288.50
TOTAL AUTHORIZED
COMPENSATION.............. $145,578.50 $ 51,500.00 $197,078.50
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 2 in farm approved by the
General Counsel .
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1990.
"L-2" AGENDA ITEM #9( l ) (2) - DISTRICT 2 "L-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 90-134-7
ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT N0. 7 ANNEXATION NO. 134
SOUTHWEST DIVERSIFIED ANNEXATI N as
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY
TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 134 - SOUTHWEST
DIVERSIFIED ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
NO. 7)
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That a request has heretofore been made to County Sanitation
District No. 7 for annexation of territory to the District by means of a
petition filed by the property owner, Southwest Diversified, Inc.; and,
Section 2. That the designation assigned by the District to the territory
proposed to be annexed is "Annexation No. 134 - Southwest Diversified Annexation
to County Sanitation District No. 711, the exterior boundaries of which are
described on Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by
reference made a part of this resolution; and,
Section 3. That pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government
Reorganization Act of 1985, Division 3, commencing with Section 56000 of the
California Government Code, application has heretofore been made by District
No. 7 to the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation of said territory
to County Sanitation District No. 7, by means of Resolution No. 90-5-7, filed
with said Commission by said District; and,
Section 4. That the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of
Orange adopted its Resolution No. 90-16 on July 11, 1996, making determinations
and approving proposed Annexation No. 134 to County Sanitation District No. 7 of
Orange County, California, without notice or hearing and without election; and,
Section 5. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is uninhabited;
and,
"M-1" AGENDA ITEM #9( 1 ) - DISTRICT 7 "M-1"
Section 6. That the reason for annexing said territory is to obtain and
provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory; and,
Section 7. That payment of annexation acreage fees in the amount of
$112,114.21 has been made and all terms and conditions specified by the Local
Agency Formation Commission have been satisfied; and.
Section 8. That the District has agreed, pursuant to Section 99(h)(1) of
the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its ad valorem property tax allocation
exchange with other affected taxing agencies; and,
Section 9. That the regular County assessment roll is utilized by this
District; and,
Section 10. That the affected territory will be taxed for the existing
bonded indebtedness of District No. 7; and,
Section 11. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency
Formation Commission pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government
Reorganization Act of 1985, Division 3, Section 56837 of the California
Government Code, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described
hereinabove, be, and is hereby, ordered annexed to County Sanitation District
No. 7 without notice or hearing and without election; and,
Section 12. That the Secretary of District No. 7 transmit a certified copy
of this resolution, with applicable fees required by Section 54902.5 of the
Government Code, to the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation
Commission of Orange County.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1990.
"M-2" AGENDA ITEM #9( 1 ) - DISTRICT 7 "M-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 90-135-7
ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT . 7 (ANNEXATION N . 135
WILD ANNEXAT N
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY
TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 135 - WILLIAMS
ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7)
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That a request has heretofore been made to County Sanitation
District No. 7 for annexation of territory to the District by means of a
petition filed by the property owners, Donald R. Williams and Sharon
V. Williams, owners of Trail-Rite, Inc.; and,
Section 2. That the designation assigned by the District to the territory
proposed to be annexed is "Annexation No. 135 - Williams Annexation to County
Sanitation District No. 711, the exterior boundaries of which are described on
Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by reference made a
part of this resolution; and,
Section 3. That pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government
Reorganization_Act of 1985, Division 3, commencing with Section 56000 of the
California Government Code, application has heretofore been made by District
No. 7 to the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation of said territory
to County Sanitation District No. 7, by means of Resolution No. 90-65-7, filed
with said Commission by said District; and,
Section 4. That the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of
Orange adopted its Resolution No. 90-21 on August 8, 1990, making determinations
and approving proposed Annexation No. 135 to County Sanitation District No. 7 of
Orange County, California, without notice or hearing and without election; and,
"N-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(k) - DISTRICT 7 "N-l"
Section S. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is uninhabited;
and,
�.' Section 6. That the reason for annexing said territory is to obtain and
provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory; and,
Section 7. That payment of annexation acreage fees in the amount of
$9,452.50 has been made and all terms and conditions specified by the Local
Agency Formation Commission have been satisfied; and,
Section 8. That the District has agreed, pursuant to Section 99(h)(1) of
the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its ad valorem property tax allocation
exchange with other affected taxing agencies; and,
Section 9. That the regular County assessment roll is utilized by this
District; and,
Section 10. That the affected territory will be taxed for the existing
bonded indebtedness of District No. 7; and,
Section 11. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency
Formation Commission pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government
Reorganization Act of 1985, Division 3, Section 56837 of the California
Government Code, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described
hereinabove, be, and is hereby, ordered annexed to County Sanitation District
No. 7 without notice or hearing and without election; and,
Section 12. That the Secretary of District No. 7 transmit a certified copy
of this resolution, with applicable fees required by Section 54902.5 of the
Government Code, to the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation
Commission of Orange County.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1990.
"N-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(k) - DISTRICT 7 "N-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 90-136-7
ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO COUNTY ,
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. (ANNEXATION NO. 138
MUC7 NN TI N
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY
TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 138 - GABLE
ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7)
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That a request has heretofore been made to County Sanitation
District No. 7 for annexation of territory to the District by means of a
petition filed by the property owners, James Gable, Wilfred Taylor and Ethel
Lathrum; and,
Section 2. That the designation assigned by the District to the territory
proposed to be annexed is "Annexation No. 138 - Gable Annexation to County
Sanitation District No. 70, the exterior boundaries of which are described on
Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by reference made a
part of thi's resolution; and,
Section 3. That pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government
Reorganization Act of 1985, Division 3, commencing with Section 56000 of the
California Government Code, application has heretofore been made by District
No. 7 to the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation of said territory
to County Sanitation District No. 7, by means of Resolution No. 90-37-7, filed
with said Commission by said District; and,
Section 4. That the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of
Orange adopted its Resolution No. 90-18 on August 8, 1990, making determinations
and approving proposed Annexation No. 138 to County Sanitation District No. 7 of
Orange County, California, without notice or hearing and without election; and, �...✓
"0-1" AGENDA ITEM #9( 1) - DISTRICT 7 "0-I"
Section 5. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is uninhabited;
and,
Section 6. That the reason for annexing said territory is to obtain and
provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory; and,
Section 7. That payment of annexation acreage fees in the amount of
$11,002.71 has been made and all terms and conditions specified by the Local
Agency Formation Commission have been satisfied; and,
Section 8. That the District has agreed, pursuant to Section 99(h)(1) of
the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its ad valorem property tax allocation
exchange with other affected taxing agencies; and,
Section 9. That the regular County assessment roll is utilized by this
District; and,
Section 10. That the affected territory will be taxed for the existing
bonded indebtedness of District No. 7; and,
Section 11. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency
Formation Commission pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government
Reorganization Act of 1985, Division 3, Section 56837 of the California
Government Code, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described
hereinabove, be, and is hereby, ordered annexed to County Sanitation District
No. 7 without notice or hearing and without election; and,
Section 12. That the Secretary of District No. 7 transmit a certified copy
of this resolution, with applicable fees required by Section 54902.5 of the
Government Code, to the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation
Commission of Orange County.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1990.
"0-2" AGENDA ITEM #9( 1 ) - DISTRICT 7 "0-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 90-115
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
R JOB N . J-19-1 1./
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CENTRAL POWER GENERATION
SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. J719-1
WHEREAS, Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers, Districts' engineers,
have completed preparation of the plans and specifications for Central Power
Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the proposed project for construction of Central Power
Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, is hereby approved. Said
project was included in the Supplement (No. 1) to Joint Treatment Works
Wastewater Master Plan EIR approved by the Boards of Directors on November 18,
1987. A Notice of Determination was filed by the Secretary on November 25,
1987, in accordance with the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and,
Section 2. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents
this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by Brown and Caldwell Consulting
Engineers, Districts' engineers, for construction of Central Power Generation
System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, are hereby approved and adopted; and,
Section 3. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for
bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Public Contracts Code of
the State of California; and,
11P-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "P-1"
Section 4. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date
and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and,
Section S. That the Secretary and the Districts' Director of Engineering
or his designee be authorized to open said bids an behalf of the Boards of
Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1990.
"P-2" A5Ei9DA ITEM #11(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "P-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 90-116
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
JOB NOS. PI-34-3 AND P1- 5-2
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S. 6,
7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION
OF DIGESTERS NOS. 11-16 AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1,
JOB NO. P1-34-3, AND REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS 9
AND 10 AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-35-2
WHEREAS, John Carollo Engineers, Districts' engineers, have completed
preparation of the plans and specifications for Construction of Digesters
Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-3; and,
WHEREAS, Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers, Districts' engineers,
have completed preparation of the plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of
Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-2.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 69 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the proposed project for Construction of Digesters
Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-3, is hereby approved.
Said project was included in Supplement No. 2 to the Joint Treatment Works
Wastewater Master Plan approved on May 10, 1989. A Notice of Determination was
filed by the Secretary on May 18, 1989, in accordance with the Districts'
Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as
amended; and,
Section 2. That pursuant to the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, the Districts have
concurrently undertaken an environmental review of the proposed project for
Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-35-2, and hereby determine that said project is categorically exempt from
further CEQA requirements; and,
"0-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-1"
Section 3. That the project for Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at
Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-2, is hereby approved. (Said project was
previously approved on August 9, 1989, along with Job No. P2-39, but it has been
determined that it would be more appropriate to combine this work with Job
No. P1-34-3 instead.) A Notice of Exemption was filed by the Secretary on
March 14, 1988, in accordance with the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and,
Section 4. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents
this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by John Carollo Engineers,
Districts' engineers for Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation
Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-3, and Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers,
Districts' engineers for Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation
Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-2, are hereby approved and adopted; and.
Section 5. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for
bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Public Contracts Code of
the State of California; and,
Section 6. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date
and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and,
Section 7. That the Secretary and the Districts' Director of Engineering
or his designee be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of
Directors. .
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1990.
"Q-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "Q-2-
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
CREATING COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.
1990 CONSTRUCTION FUND
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT NO. OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, CREATING A
1990 CONSTRUCTION FUND
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. has
heretofore stated its desire and intent to fund future construction in part from
the proceeds of borrowing.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That there is hereby established the 1990 Construction Fund of
County Sanitation District No. _; and,
Section 2. That said fund shall be used for the 1990 proceeds of borrowing
to be expended only for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction,
maintenance and operation of sewerage facilities and other purposes described in
Section 5474.9 of the California Health and Safety code.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1990.
"R" AGENDA ITEM #13 - DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5.6,7 & 11 "R"
RESOLUTION NO. 90-109-13
ESTABLISHING USE CHARGES FOR 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR
PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE . 1305
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING USE CHARGES FOR CLASS I,
CLASS II AND CLASS III PERMITTEES FOR THE 1990-91
FISCAL YEAR PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 1305
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has heretofore adopted Ordinance No. 1305,
an Ordinance Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District
Sewerage Facilities; and,
WHEREAS, said Ordinance provides that the Board of Directors shall
annually adapt a charge for use of District facilities by Class I, Class II and
Class III permittees.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 13 of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That pursuant to Sections 302.6 and 303.6 of Ordinance
No. 1305, the 1990-91 fiscal year charges for use for Class I and Class II
permittees are hereby established as follows:
For Flaw: $430.64 per million gallons of flow
For Suspended Solids: $154.58 per thousand pounds of S.S.
For Biochemical Oxygen Demand: $120.98 per thousand pounds of B.O.D.
Section 2. That pursuant to Section 304.6 of Ordinance No. 1305, the
1990-91 fiscal year charge for use for Class III permittees is hereby established
as follows:
For Flow: $1,005.17 per million gallons of flow
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting .held September 12, 1990.
"S" AGENDA ITEM #20 '- DISTRICT 13 „g„
RESOLUTION NO. 90-127-2
AWARDING CONTRACT NOS. 2-26-3. 2-28 AND 2-29
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT NO.. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AWARDING CONTRACT
FOR PORTION OF EUCLID INTERCEPTOR, BETWEEN BROADWAY AND
ORANGETHORPE AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 2-26-3 (INCLUDING CITY OF
ANAHEIM STREET IMPROVEMENTS); KATELLA RELIEF SEWER, BETWEEN
EUCLID STREET AND WALNUT STREET (NINTH STREET) , CONTRACT
NO. 2-28; AND ORANGEWOOD DIVERSION SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-29
x x t x x x x x x x x x x
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange
County California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the proposed construction contract is for projects which
are a portion of the previously-approved Amendment No. 1 to the Consolidated
Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3 and 11.
The project is to be constructed as per the Master Plan approval. In accordance
with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and Section
15090 of the Districts' Guidelines, a Final Focused Environmental Impact Report
for Amendment No. 1 to the District's Master Plan covering this project was
approved by the District's Board of Directors June 10, 1987; and,
Section 2. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the
Board of Directors by the Districts' Director of Engineering that award of
contract be made to Steve Bubalo Construction Co. for construction of Portion of
Euclid Interceptor, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract
No. 2-26-3 (including City of Anaheim Street Improvements) ; Katella Relief
Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street (Ninth Street) , Contract
No. 2-28; and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29, and bid tabulation
and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed;
and,
Section 3. That the contract for construction of Portion of Euclid
Interceptor, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-3
"T-1" AGENDA ITEM #23(c) - DISTRICT 2 "T-1"
(including City of Anaheim Street Improvements); Katella Relief Sewer, between
Euclid Street and Walnut Street (Ninth Street), Contract No. 2-28; and
Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29, be awarded to Steve Bubalo
Construction Co. in the total amount of $7,953,755.00, in accordance with the
terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and,
Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby
authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor
for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor,
in farm approved by the General Counsel ; and,
Section S. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1990.
"T-2" AGENDA ITEM #23(c) - DISTRICT 2 "T-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRIOTS
EI ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA
August 21, 1990 at 11:00 a.m. +e9AA ELU9 AVENUE
1 ADDENDUM RC.eon ete)
F WAIN VA Y.CALIWNNIA GM
B I D T A B U L A T I O N 911,9824e11
S H E E T
CONTRACTS NOS. 2-26-3: 2-28 and 2-29
PROJECT TITLE Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer. between Broadway and
ro Orangethoe Avenue. Contract No. 2-26-3, (including City of Anaheim Street
Im rovements Katella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street
Ninth Street) . Contract No. 2-28: and Orangewood Diversion Sewer,
Contract No. 2-29
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 48-inch RCP sewer between Broadway and 0 angethorpe Avenue
(including City of Anaheim Street Improvements) : 27-inch VCP sewer between
Euclid Street and Walnut Street: and 48-inch RCP sewer between State College
Boulevard and Santa Ana River
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $12,000,000.00 BUDGET AMOUNT $11,062,000.00
Contract No. 2-26-3: $ 9,355,200.00 $ 8,683,000.00
Contract No. 2-28: $ 1,204,800.00 $ 1,136,000.00
Contract No. 2-29: $ 1,440,000.00 $ 1,243,000.00
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
1. Steve Bubalo Construction Co., Monrovia, CA $7,953,755.00
2. Colich & Sons (JV) , Gardena, CA $8,427,915.00
3. Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc., Sunland, CA $8,738,135.00
4. K.E.C. Company, Corona, CA $8,750,000.00
5. S. A. Healy Co. & Associates, Azusa, CA $8,847,000.00
6. Silveri & Le Bouef JV, Anaheim, CA - $9,560,312.00*
7. Hood Corporation, Whittier, CA $9,826,516.78*
*Corrected Total
I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the
low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recolmllen award to Steve Bubalo
Construction Co. of Monrovia, CA in the bi unt $7,953,755.00 as the
lowest and best bid.
4omas"M. Oa
Director of Engineering
"T-3" AGENDA ITEM #23(c) - DISTRICT 2 "T-3"
RESOLUTION NO. 90-129
APPROVING REVISED AGREEMENT BETWEEN DISTRICTS 3
AND 11 RE JOINT SEWAGE COLLECTION FACILITIES
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 3 AND 11
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REVISED
AGREEMENT BETWEEN DISTRICTS 3 AND 11, PROVIDING
FOR FINANCING, DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, CAPACITY
OWNERSHIP AND OPERATION OF CERTAIN MASTER-PLANNED
SEWAGE COLLECTION FACILITIES FOR SERVING
DISTRICTS 3 AND 11, AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION
NO. 90-53
# f k k f f f f f k k k f f #
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors, on July 19, 1989, approved and
adopted the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan dated
February 1989; and,
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors, on May 9, 1990, approved and adopted a
Project Report relative to Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System
Improvements, Contract No. 11-17, dated April 3, 1990; and,
WHEREAS, said Master Plan and Project Report set forth certain
master-planned joint sewage collection facilities required for serving portions
of Districts Nos. 3 and 11; and,
WHEREAS, the Boards previously adopted Resolution No. 90-53 which approved
an agreement between Districts Nos. 3 and 11 reflecting a cost-sharing formula
that must now be changed.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 3 and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Agreement dated September 12, 1990, by and
between County Sanitation District No. 3 and County Sanitation District No. 11,
providing for the financing, design, construction, capacity ownership and
operation of certain master-planned sewage collection facilities for serving
"U-1" AGENDA ITEM #26(b) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "U-1"
Districts Nos. 3 and 11, is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That said Agreement provides for the joint construction of the
Slater Avenue Pump Station, including the Slater Avenue Pump Station Influent
Relief Sewer, Force Main, Gravity Sewer, and Diversion Structure; provides for
casts to be shared in proportion to average flow contribution resulting in
approximately 84% of the cost to be paid by District No. 11 and 16% to be paid
by District No. 3, as set forth in Exhibit uA" attached hereto and made a part
of this resolution; and further provides that said ratio may be changed if the
flow ratio changes from that provided in the Project Report, to be determined at
the time final design is approved by the Boards of Directors; and,
Section 3. That said Agreement provides for the exchange of capacity in
existing sewer collection facilities, including the Newland-Delaware Trunk
Sewer, the Newland Street Interceptor, the Coast Trunk Sewer, Slater Avenue
Force Main, Nichols Street Gravity Sewer and Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, in
accordance with the previously-adopted capacity exchange formula, resulting in a
net buy-in cost for the sale of capacity from District No. 11 to District No. 3
in the amount of $699,636.00, as set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and
made a part of this resolution; and,
Section 4. That the Chairmen and Secretary of Districts Nos. 3 and 11 are
hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreement in farm approved by the
General Counsel .
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1990.
"U-2" AGENDA ITEM #26(b) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "U-2"
�N
EXHIBIT A
PROJECT COST SPLIT
NEW IMPROVEMENTS
District District District District
No. 3 No. 11 No. 3 No. 11 District District
n Flow Flow Share Share No. 3 No. 11
71 Item Project Cost (MGD) (MGD) ($) ($) Cost Cost
z
C7
n
Heil Avenue '
m Inteceptor $ 3,484,000 0 NA 0 100 0 $ 3,484,000
3
Golden West
N Trunk Sewer $ 4, 302,000 0 NA O 100 0 $ 4, 302,000
s
Slater Avenue
Pump Station
Influent
o Relief Sewer $ 737, 000 2.33 2.76 45.8 54 .2 $ 337, 500 $ 399,500
Slater Avenue
Force Main/
—i Gravity Sewer/
Diversion
�+ Structure $ 1,141,000 2. 33 16.44 12.4 87.6 $ 141,500 $ 999,500
Slater Avenue
Relief Sewers $ 2, 597, 000 0 NA 0 100 0 $ 2,597,000
Slater Avenue
Pump Station/
72" Influent $ 5, 340, 000 2.33 16.44 12.4 87 .6 $ 662,200 $ 4, 677,800
$17, 601,000 $1, 141,200 $16, 459,800
c
C
I
C
EXHIBIT B
PROJECT BUY-IN COSTS
Existing Ownership M Needed Ownership M Buy-in Cost
Updated District District District District District District
Item Cost 3 11 3 11 3 11
m ENRLA=5766
z
v
n
24-inch Slater
Avenue Force
3 Main $ 165,400 0 100 12.4 87.6 $ 20,500 0
s Nichols Street
Gravity Sewer
MH 296-131 $ 602,600 0 100 57.8 42.2 $348,300 0
Newland/Delaware/ 1 33. 3 66.7 34 .6 65.4
Coast Trunk Z 0 100 21.0 79.0
Exchange 3 0 100 3.9 96.1 $563,036 0
v
Miller-Holder
nTrunk Sewer $6, 450, 000 100 0 96.4 3.60 0 $232,200
w
eo Totals $931,836 $232,200
Net Buy-in Cost to District 3 $699,636
Newland/Delaware Trunk Sewer
ZNewland Street Interceptor
3 Coast Trunk Sewer from Newland to Plant 2
(1\1024 .rr)
c
r
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 9272MI27
o. 108"ELLIS,FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
.9ecW (714)062-2411
June 21, 1990
Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 3 and 11
10844 E11is Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018
Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum No. 1 to the Professional
Services Agrement with John Carollo Engineers in Connection with
Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Contract
No. 11-17
in accordance with the District's procedures for selection of professional
engineering services, the Selection Coumittee has negotiated the following fee
for Addendum No. 1 to the professional services areman* with John Carollo
Enngines= for final design and construction support services for Slater Avenue
Pump Station Sewage System Inprovennents, Contract No. 11-17, on an hourly-rate
basis including labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants fees
and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed $649,383.00.
This New
Exit Total
Professional Services,
(hourly rates including
I abor plus overhead at
1558), not to exceed $ 38,903 $512,088 $550,991
Direct Expenses,
not to exceed -0- 3,000 3,000
Subconsultant Fees,
not to exceed -0- 70,295 70,295
Fixed Profit 3,835 64,000 69,835
Total $ 44,738 $649,383 $694,121
\.n✓
"V-11 AGENDA ITEM #26(c) (1) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "V-1"
i
COUNTY SANITATION DISfRI&S
AI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
selection Camuttee
Districts 3 and 11 10B ELL AV WE
An W
June 21 1990
EOUMNN VALLEY.CAEI ,DRN, ce�
Page Two mneatx N"0/
The Selection CmAittee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee
as reasonable for the services to be perfomed and that said fee will not
result in excessive profits for the consultant.
/s/Richard T. Polis /s/Grace H. Winchell
Richard T. Pol-is, Chai.vren Grace H. Wi.nchell, Chairaan
District No. 3 District No. 11
Selection Ccslittee Selection Ca mittee
/s/Thomas M. Dawes
Thcmas M. Dawes
Director of Engineering
Selection Committee
"V-2" AGENDA ITEM #26(c)(1) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "V-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 90-130
APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERSFOR PHASE I
PRELIMINARY PROJECT REPORT FOR SLATER AVENUE PUMP
STATION SEWAGE T IMPROVEMENTS
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 3 AND it OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO THE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO
ENGINEERS FOR PREPARATION OF PHASE I PRELIMINARY
PROJECT REPORT FOR SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION
SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS, PROVIDING FOR FINAL
DESIGN OF CONTRACT NO. 11-17 AND CONSTRUCTION
SUPPORT SERVICES RE SAID PROJECT
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into a Professional Services
Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for preparation of Phase I Preliminary
Project Report for Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements; and,
WHEREAS, it is deemed appropriate to amend the agreement with John Carollo
Engineers to provide for final design of Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage
System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17, and construction support services for
said project; and,
WHEREAS, the Selection Committee has negotiated and certified a fee for said
additional services in accordance with established procedures for selection of
professional engineering services.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation District Nos. 3
and 11 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Addendum No. 1 dated September 12, 1990, to that certain
Professional Services Agreement dated June 7, 1989, by and between County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 3 and 11 and John Carollo Engineers, for preparation
of Phase I Preliminary Project Report for Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage
System Improvements, providing for final design of Contract No. 11-17 and
"W-1" AGENDA ITEM #26(c) (2) - DISTRICTS 3 S 11 "W-1"
r
construction support services for said project, is hereby approved and accepted;
and,
Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased by an amount
not to exceed $649,383.00, as follows, increasing the total authorized
compensation from $44,738.00 to an amount not to exceed $694,121.00:
Existing Change per Amended
Agreement Addendum No. 1 Agreement
Professional Services
(hourly rates for labor
plus overhead at 155%),
not to exceed .............. $ 38,903.00 $512,088.00 $550,991.00
Direct Expenses,
not to exceed ............... -0- 3,000.00 3,000.00
Subconsultant Fees,
not to exceed ............... -0- 70,295.00 70,295.00
Fixed Profit ................. 3,835.00 64,000.00 69,835.00
TOTAL AUTHORIZED
COMPENSATION.............. $ 44,738.00 $649,383.00 $694,121.00
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 11, acting for
itself and on behalf of District No. 3, are hereby authorized and directed to
execute said Addendum No. 1 in form approved by the General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1990.
"W-2" AGENDA ITEM #26(c)(2) - DISTRICTS 3 & , 1_ "W-2"
r
RESOLUTION NO. 90-131
PERTAINING TO SETTING THE TINE AND PLACE FOR
A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ADOPTION OF A
RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY TO ORDER THE
ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY BY RHINENT
DOMAIN
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 6, 7 AND
14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, PERTAINING TO
THE SETTING OF THE TINE AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC
HEARING ON THE ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION OF
NECESSITY TO ORDER THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN
PROPERTY BY EMINENT DOMAIN
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts NOS. 6, 7 and 14 intend to undertake a certain project
generally described as follows: construction of the Baker-Gisler
Interceptor, Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A
(hereinafter referred to as "Project") ; and
WHEREAS, in order to accomplish said Project, it is necessary
to acquire certain property hereinafter called "Subject Property",
and
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors desire to fix a time and
place for a public hearing on the matter of the adoption of a
Resolution of Necessity to acquire said Subject Property by eminent
domain, pursuant to Sections 1245.210 et as . of the Code of Civil
Procedure; and
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors have received, considered and
ordered filed in the office of the Board Secretary a copy of the
proposed Resolution of Necessity to acquire said Subject Property
by eminent domain.
1
"4000�
"y-1" AGENDA ITEM #31(d) - DISTRICTS G, 7 R 14 "y-1"
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the above Recitals are all true and
correct.
Section 2. That the acquisition of said Subject Property
appears necessary to accomplish said Project and that a proper and
legal description of said Subject Property is set forth in said
proposed Resolution of Necessity, a copy of which is on file in the
office of the Board Secretary.
Section 3. That the Boards of Directors hereby call a
hearing on the matter of the adoption of the Resolution of
Necessity to acquire said Subject Property by eminent domain at the
time and place specified as follows:
DATE AND TIME: PLACE:
Wednesday County Sanitation Districts
October 10, 1990 of Orange County, California
7:30 P.M. Board Room
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Section 4. That each person owning or claiming a right in
said subject property to be acquired by eminent domain shall be
given a reasonable opportunity to appear and be heard at said
public hearing on the matter specified as follows:
(a) That the public interest and necessity requires the
Project;
(b) That the Project is planned or located in the manner that
will be most compatible with the greatest public good and
lease private injury; and
(c) That the property sought to be acquired is necessary for
2
"Y-2" AGENDA ITEM #31(d) - DISTRICTS 6, 7 & 14 "Y-2"
said Project.
Section 5. That, pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the Code
of Civil Procedure, the Board Secretary is hereby authorized and
directed to give mailed notice of said public hearing, within
fifteen (15) days prior thereto, first class and postage prepaid,
to each person owning or claiming a right to said Subject Property
proposed to be acquired by eminent domain and whose name and
address appears on the last equalized County Assessment Roll.
Section 6. That, for further particulars, reference is
made to said proposed Resolution of Necessity on file in the office
of the Board Secretary and to Section 1245.235 of the Code of Civil
Procedure and the Sections related thereto.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12,
1990.
(Q\546.cjo)
3
"Y-3" AGENDA ITEM #31(d) - DISTRICTS 6, 7 & 14 "Y-3"
RESOLUTION NO. 90-132
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
CONTRACTFOR . 14-1-2
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NOS. 7 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
BAKER FORCE MAINS, FROM MAIN STREET PUMP STATION TO
BRISTOL STREET, CONTRACT NO. 14-1-2
f f f f f f t ! f ! f t t t f f
WHEREAS, Boyle Engineering Corporation, Districts' engineer, has completed
preparation of the plans and specifications for construction of the Baker Force
Mains, from Main Street Pump Station to Bristol Street, Contract No. 14-1-2.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 7 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the proposed project for Baker Force Mains, from Main
Street Pump Station to Bristol Street, Contract No. 14-1-2, is included in the
Supplement No. 1 to the Environmental Impact Report for Proposed Formation of
County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving
Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13. In accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and Section 15090 of the
Districts' Guidelines, the Final Supplement No. 1 to the Environmental Impact
Report was approved on July 11, 1990. A Notice of Determination was filed by
the Secretary on July 24, 1990, in accordance with the Districts' Guidelines
Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and,
Section 2. That the project for Baker Force Mains, from Main Street Pump
Station to Bristol Street, Contract No. 14-1-2, is hereby approved, and that the
Secretary be directed to file any documents required by said Guidelines
Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and,
Section 3. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents
this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Boyle Engineering Corporation,
Districts' engineers, for construction of the Baker Force Mains, from Main
"Z-1" AGENDA ITEM #34(b) - DISTRICTS 7 & 14 "Z-1"
Street Pump Station to Bristol Street, Contract No. 14-1-2, are hereby approved
and adopted; and,
�...� Section 4. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for
bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Public Contracts Code of
the State of California; and,
Section 5. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date
and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and,
Section 6. That the Secretary and the Districts' Director of Engineering
or his designee be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of
Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 12, 1990.
"Z-1" AGENDA ITEM #34(b) - DISTRICTS 7 & 14 "Z-1"
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2,
I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting
on 19 9 0 was duly posted for public inspection
at the main lobby of the Districts ' offices on
1990 .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this
day of U&-Up 19-R-0,
Rita J. Browrk4 Secretary of
each of the Boards of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 , 11, 13 6
14 of Orange County, California