Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-08-08 F�+•'"" � ,4"^e COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS N OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 9127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9212b9127 10944 ELLIS,FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7019 (714)992-2411 August 1, 1990 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 8, 1990 - 7: 30 P.M. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. secretary Tentatively-Scheduled Upcoming Meetings: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - None Scheduled V..r' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of GRANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA JO Ew6 AVENUE PO Box 81V rauxrux vu1Er,rsux�mnA Bzn§ ntaresxaa++ JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetinqs August Aug 08, 1990 None Scheduled September Sep 12, 1990 Sep 26 , 1990 October Oct 10, 1990 Oct 24, 1990 November Nov 14, 1990 None Scheduled December Dec 12, 1990 None Scheduled January Jan 09, 1991 Jan 23, 1991 February Feb 13, 1991 Feb 27, 1991 March Mar 13, 1991 Mar 27, 1991 April Apr 10, 1991 Apr 24, 1991 May May 08, 1991 May 29, 1991 June Jun 12, 1991 Jun 26 , 1991 July Jul 10, 1991 Jul 24, 1991 August Aug 14; 1991 None Scheduled . 9r_ BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation DlsMets P.O.Box 8127.10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County,California Fountain Volley,CA 9272E-8127 Telephone:(714)962-2411 JOINT BOARDS AGENDA REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 8, 1990 - 7:30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. `J (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call ( 3) -Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (see listing in Board Meeting folders) (5) Public Comments: A11 persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. ( 6 ) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. (a) Report of Joint Chairman (b) Report of General Manager (c) Report of General Counsel 8/OB/90� (7) EACH DISTRICT ACTIN no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman: District 1 - July 11, 1990 regular District 2 - July 11, 1990 regular District 3 - July 11, 1990 regular District 5 - July 11, 1990 regular District 6 - July 11, 1990 regular District 7 - July 11, 1990 regular District 11 - July 11, 1990 regular District 13 - July 11, 1990 regular District 14 - July 11, 1990 regular (8) ALL DISTRICTS Cons� n of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District. ) See pages "A" and "B" 7/04/90 7/18/90 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 894,769.45 $ 729,738.03 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 6,710,901.54 368,265.20 - Joint Working Capital Fund - 206,970.22 191,899.56 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 104,900.52 17,122.96 DISTRICT NO. 1 - -0- 1,076,251.41 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 177,357.30 1,941,447. 35 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 323,737 .66 2,106,158 .02 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 29,155. 30 8,746 .68 DISTRICT NO. 6 - -0- 525.75 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 190,799.64 53,411.59 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 78.84 1,573.51 DISTRICT NO. 13 - -0- 85.00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 206,332.91 3,872.46 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 3,580.49 5,537.99 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2, 353 .14 -0- DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 3, 348. 35 -0- $8,854,285. 36 $6,504,635.51 -2- r r (9) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 9 e THROUGH 9 A mat ers p ace on e consen ca enL considered as not requiring discussion of explanation and unless any particular iten, .../ requested to be removed from the consent ca a Director, staff member, or member of the p attendance, there will be no separate discuss. these items. All items on the consent ealenda. be enacted by one action approving all motions, casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions incluk on the consent calendar. All items removed from % consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. The Chairman will determine if any items are to be \ deleted from the consent calendar. \ Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of the following actions re Purchase of Forty (40) Four-wheel Electric Personnel Carriers, Specification No. A-148, and Purchase of Thirteen (13) Four-wheel Electric Cargo Carriers, Specification No. A-149: (1) Consideration of motion cancelling purchase of the remaining balance of 29 four-wheel electric personnel carriers provided for in the purchase contract authorized by the Boards, action of December .13, 1989, • awarding purchase Specification No. A-148 to Karrior Manufacturing Company, in the net remaining amount of $107,271.00 plus sales tax, based on breach of contract and non-performance by the vendor. (2) Consideration of motion authorizing and directing the General Counsel to institute legal proceedings against Fleet Equipment Corporation (formerly Karrior Manufacturing Company) , if determined upon further investigation to be appropriate, to recover payment and damages for eleven (11) four-wheel personnel carriers delivered and paid for pursuant to Specification No. A-148 and subsequently determined to be of poor workmanship and unsafe to operate. [ITEM (9) (a) CONTINUED ON PAGE 41 -3- 8/08/90' o (9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (a) (Continued from page 3) ( 3) Consideration of motion cancelling the purchase contract authorized by the Boards ' �,.. action of December 13, 1989, awarding Purchase Specification No. A-149 to Karrior Manufacturing Company, in the total amount of $55,411.20 plus sales tax, based on breach of contract and non-performance by the vendor. (4) Consideration of motion awarding balance of purchase contract for Specification No. A-148 to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company, as a substitute vendor for the original defaulting vendor for the completion of the contract on the same terms and conditions, to wit: delivery of 29 personnel carriers at the same unit price, for the total amount of $107 ,271 .00 plus sales tax. (5) Consideration of motion awarding purchase contract for Specification No. A-149 to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company, as a substitute vendor for the original defaulting vendor for the performance of the entire contract on the same terms and conditions, to wit: delivery of 13 cargo carriers at the same unit price, for the total amount of $55,411.20 plus sales tax. (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-97, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Anionic Polyelectrolyte Chemical Polymer, Specification No. P-120, to Callaway Chemical Company, Division of Exxon Chemical Company, for the price of $.865 per wet pound, plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning September 1, 1990, with provision for four one-year extensions upon mutually-agreeable terms (Estimated annual cost $181,027 .20 plus sales tax) . See page "C" (c) Consideration of the following actions relative to Purchase of Caustic Soda Solution, Specification No. P-121: (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from HoltraChem West, Inc. dated July 16, 1990, the apparent low bidder, requesting that they be allowed to withdraw their bid for said material due to a mathematical error. See page "D" [ITEM (9) (C) CONTINUED ON PAGE 5] �✓ -4- a ' 8/08/90 (9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (c) (Continued from page 4) (2) Consideration of motion approving request of HoltraChem West, Inc. for withdrawal of their bid. ( 3 ) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-98, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Caustic Soda Solution, Specification No. P-121, to Western States Chemical Supply Corporation, for the price of $348.49 per dry ton, plus freight and sales tax, for a one-year period beginning September 1, 1990, with provision for a one-year extension (Estimated costs to be shared as follows: ) See page "E" Treatment Trunk Plants Sewers Total Joint Districts $523,273.50 $436,061 .25 $ 959, 334.75 District 3 Only 436,061 .25 436,061.25 $523,273 .50 $872,122.50 $1 ,395, 396 .00 (d) Consideration of motion approving Change Order `.../ No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17 , authorizing a net addition of $57,876 . 31 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for six items of additional work or deletions. See page IF., (e) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications for Warehouse and Maintenance Building and Oil Storage and Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20, authorizing an addition of $30,840.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for eight items of additional work, and granting a time extension of eight calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page "G" (f) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Gas Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1 , Job No. P1-34-1, authorizing a net addition of $35,609 . 00 to the contract with Ziebarth 6 Alper for six items of additional work or deletions. See page "H" �. -5- 8/08790 (9 ) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (g) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-99, accepting Rehabilitation of Digesters 7 and a at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-1, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "I" (h) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-100, approving Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Malcolm Pirnle, Inc. for design and construction services required for Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-25; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-26; Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33; and Improvements to Grit Facility "B" , Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure "A" , Job No. P2-34, providing for a reallocation of the costs among categories within said agreement, with no change in the maximum authorized compensation of $892,708.00. See page "J" (i) Consideration of the following actions relative to Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers for design and construction services required for Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33, providing for additional construction support services, preparation of an amendment to the Operations and Maintenance Manual, and start-up and training services, and reducing subconsultant fees previously authorized: (1 ) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for said additional services. See page "R" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-101, approving Addendum No. 3 to said Agreement with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers for said additional services and reduction in subconsultant fees, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, for an additional amount not to exceed $123,400.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $1,064,500.00 to an amount not to exceed $1 ,187,900.00. See page "L" -6- I 8/08/90 (9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (j ) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate a Professional Services Agreement for engineering and environmental services for preparation of a Project Report, Supplement No. 2 to the Program Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, and for design and construction support services . relative to Primary Clarifiers 16-27 and Related Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-37. (k) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to employ a Financial Manager at the top step of the salary range (currently $5,669 .00 per month) for this position classification to work in the Districts' Finance Division. (1) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to employ a Laboratory Manager at the top step of the salary range (currently $5,592.00 per month) for this position classification to work In the Districts' Technical Services/Laboratory Division. DISTRICT 2 - (m) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate a Professional Services Agreement for preparation of a Project Report for Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1. (n) consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Willdan Associates for design and construction services required for Portion of Euclid Interceptor, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-3, and Katella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-28, to provide for additional design services necessary to incorporate changes recommended by CALTRANS and the Cities of Anaheim and Fullerton, and for other miscellaneous services required re Contract No. 2-26-3. (o) consideration of Resolution No. 90-113-2, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex 6.687 acres of territory to the District located in the vicinity of Sycamore Street and Santiago _ Boulevard in the City of Villa Park (proposed Annexation No. 72 - Trider Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2) . See page "M" -7- (9) DISTRICT 5 - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) - a (p) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 2, Contract No. 5-34-2, authorizing an addition of $28,803.00 to the contract with Kenko, Inc. , dba McGrand 6 Associates, for two items of additional work, and granting a time extension of six calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page N. DISTRICT 6 (q) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-114-6, approving Agreement between County Sanitation District No. 6, Costa Mesa Sanitary District and the 32nd Agricultural District, providing for the transfer of ownership and/or abandonment of sewers and easements within and adjacent to the Orange County Fairgrounds from District No. 6 to the Costa Mesa Sanitary District and the 32nd Agricultural District. See page D. DISTRICTS 7 6 14 (r) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road (and City of Costa Mesa street improvements) , Contract No. 14-1-iB, authorizing an addition of $94,697.00 to the contract with Steve Bubalo Construction Co. for ten items of additional work. See page P. (s) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Kathleen P. Landers dated June 24, 1990, in the amount of $650.50 for alleged damages to \ , her vehicle incurred in connection with mar construction of Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road (and City of Costa Mesa street improvements) , Contract No. 14-1-1B, and refer to the Districts General Counsel, liability claims administrator, contractor and contractor's insurance company for appropriate action. DISTRICT 7 (t) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Abandonment of Lane Road Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-1, and Abandonment of Castlerock and Dow Avenue Pump Stations and Modifications to MacArthur Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-3, authorizing an addition of $24,319.00 to the contract with Colich a Sons (Jv) for four items of additional work, and granting a time extension of seven calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page =Q. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS _ Conssi erafron of action on items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any -8- AZ 8/08/90 (11) ALL DISTRICTS Cons�E-ion of the following resolutions establishing 1990-91 charges for Class I, Class II and Class III permittess, pursuant to provisions of the uniform Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities of the respective Districts. See page "R" 1990-91 INDUSTRIAL USER RATES Class I & II Fees Class III Fee Dist. No. Resolution No. Flow(*) S.S. (* ) B.O.D. (*) 1 90-102-1 $186.80 $154.58 $120.98 $ 761. 33 2 90-103-2 182.59 154.58 120.98 757 .12 3 90-104-3 214.53 154.58 120.98 789 .06 5 90-105-5 230.18 154.58 120. 98 804.71 6 90-106-6 191.81 154.58 120.98 766 . 34 7 90-107-7 247.23 154.58 120.98 821 .77 11 90-108-11 252.94 154 .58 120.98 827 .47 13 90-109-13 430.64 154 .58 120.98 1,005 .17 14 90-110-14 344.75 154 .58 120.98 919 .28 *Flow - Per million gallons of flow *S .S. - Per thousand pounds of suspended solids *B.O.D. - Per thousand pounds of biochemical oxygen demand (12) ALL DISTRICTS Repose Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee `...� and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee' s written report of the meeting on July 26 , 1990 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) ( 13 ) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Report of the Building Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee' s written report of the meeting on July 31, 1990 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) (b) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 16 to the plans and specifications for Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4, authorizing an addition of $240,000 .00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corp. to provide interim funding for Phases 2, 3 and 4 additional framing and concrete, heating and air conditioning, electrical, fire protection, plumbing, painting, plaster and stucco, insulation, and sheet metal and roof work, as recommended by the Building Committee. -9- V 08/60 (14) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee' s written report of the meeting. on July 25, 1990 (copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) . ,... (b) Consideration of action on items recommended by said Committee: (1 ) Consideration of the following actions relative to selection of underwriter and bond counsel for the Districts ' long-range financing and borrowing program: (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-111 , designating and appointing Merrill Lynch Capital Markets as the Senior Manager/Underwriter for the Districts ' proposed long-term securities debt issue program. See page "S" (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-112, approving a Professional Services Agreement with the law firms of Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander & Ferdon and Rourke 5 woodruff to serve as co-Bond Counsel for the Districts ' proposed long-term securities debt issue program. See page "T" (2) Consideration of the following actions relative to the purchase of surface easements and sub-surface oil and mineral rights at Treatment Plant No. 2: (a) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager and General Counsel to offer to purchase oil facilities, leases and mineral rights at the appraisal prices from the following: ( 1) D. W. Elliott (2) County of Orange ( 3) Pacific Energy Resources (Raralas Lease) (4) Lessor Group (5) Overriding Royalty owners (b) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Counsel to institute eminent domain proceedings against operators or leaseholders, if necessary. (c) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to solicit proposals for the preparation of plans and specifications for abandonment and removal of the oil facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2. [ITEM ( 14 ) (b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 11 ] -10- 8/08/90 (14) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 10) (b) ( 3 ) Consideration of the following actions relative to prequalification of suppliers and/or prepurchase of certain major items of equipment: (a) Consideration of motion approving prequalification of the following suppliers of influent pumps and variable frequency drives required in connection with Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-1: Influent Pumps: (1) Fairbanks-Morse (2) Allis Chalmers ( 3 ) Patterson (4) Gould Variable Frequency Drives: (1) Westinghouse (2) Brown Boveri ( 3) Ross Hill (4) Toshiba (5) Allen-Bradley (6 ) General Electric (7 ) Louis Allis (b) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to negotiate with Parkson Corporation for the sole source purchase of Wyss aeration diffusers for use in Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1 , Job No. P1-36. (c) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to negotiate with The Budd Company for the sole source purchase of sludge collectors for use in Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2. (d) Consideration of motion approving prequalification of the following suppliers of computers and associated equipment that will interface with the Districts , existing equipment required in connection with Plant 1 Control Center instrumentation, Job No. J-23-2, and Replacement of Computerized Monitoring System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-44 : ( 1 ) Bailey Controls (2) Allen-Bradley ( 3 ) Fischer a Porter (4) Johnson Yokogawa Corp. (5) Westinghouse -11- 8/08/90 (15) ALL DISTRICTS Conssi erra ion of the following actions relative to preparation of Supplement No. 1 to the Program Environmental Impact Report : for the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, required to assess the impacts resulting from construction of the Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9: (a) Verbal staff report (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment relative to said Job No. I-9, finding that said project could have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, an Environmental Impact Report will be required . See pages "U" and ..V., (c) Consideration of motion authorizing preparation of Draft Supplement No. 1 to the Program EIR for the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, and authorizing circulation for public review in compliance with CEQA requirements. (16 ) ALL DISTRICTS Closed Session: During the course of conducting the usine�orth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards, the Chairman may convene the Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956. 9 or 54957 .6. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employee compensation; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as final actions are taken by the Directors on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary (b) Reconvene in regular session (c) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session. (17) ALL DISTRICTS 0 he r us6—iness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any -12- - 8/08/90 (18) DISTRICT 1 O'Efi-er-- u-siness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (19) DISTRICT 1 Con�tion of motion to adjourn (20) DISTRICT 2 Ott uussiness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn (22) DISTRICT 3 other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (23) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (24) DISTRICT 5 Ott u�siness and communications or supplemental agenda Stems, if any (25) DISTRICT 5 Consf-deraation of motion to adjourn (26 ) DISTRICT 6 Ot —er u—slness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (27) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (28) DISTRICT 7 OTE-e-r - u-siness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (29 ) DISTRICT 7 Con�tion of motion to adjourn (30) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (31) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn ( 32) DISTRICT 13 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 33) DISTRICT 13 Consideration of motion to adjourn ( 34) DISTRICT 14 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 35) DISTRICT 14 `✓ Consideration of motion to adjourn -13- I • BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127.10844 Mils Avenue of Orange County,California Fountain Valley,CA 9272E-8127 Telephone:(714)962-2411 JOINT BOARDS AGENDA REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 8, 1990 - 7: 30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2., or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call ( 3 ) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) -City Of Irvine (5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. ( 6 ) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. (a) Report of Joint Chairman (b) Report of General Manager (c) Report of General Counsel 8/08/90 (7) EACH DISTRICT ACTIN no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as \� mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman: District 1 - July 11, 1990 regular District 2 - July 11, 1990 regular District 3 - July 11, 1990 regular District 5 - July 11, 1990 regular District 6 - July 11, 1990 regular District 7 - July 11, 1990 regular District 11 - July 11, 1990 regular District 13 - July 11, 1990 regular District 14 - July 11, 1990 regular (8) ALL DISTRICTS ROLL CA-L Conssi erafion of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: %'n1E. . . . . . . . . . (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District. ) See pages "A" and "B" 7/04/90 7/18/90 ALL DISTRICTS Join Fund - $ 894,769 .45 $ 729,738.03 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 6,710,901 .54 368,265.20 Joint Working Capital Fund - 206,970.22 191,899.56 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 104,900.52 17,122.96 DISTRICT NO. 1 - -0- 1,076,251.41 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 177, 357. 30 1,941,447. 35 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 323,737.66 2,106,158.02 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 29,155. 30 8,746.68 DISTRICT NO. 6 - -0- 525.75 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 190,799 .64 53,411.59 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 78.84 1,573.51 DISTRICT NO. 13 - -0- 85.00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 206, 332.91 3,872.46 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 6 6 JOINT - 3,580.49 5,537.99 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 6 7 JOINT - 2, 353 .14 -0- DISTRICTS NOS. 7 6 14 JOINT - 3, 348 . 35 -0- $8,854,285. 36 $6,504,635.51 ' -2- 8/08/90 (9) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 9(a) THROUGH 9(t) All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. The Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Pdcdv* Consideration of action to approve all agenda items ° or Cast appearing on the consent calendar not specifically Unanimous Balbt removed from same, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of the following actions re Purchase of Forty (40) Four-Wheel Electric Personnel Carriers, Specification No. A-148, and Purchase of Thirteen (13) Four-Wheel Electric Cargo Carriers, Specification No. A-149: (1) Consideration of motion cancelling purchase of the remaining balance of 29 four-wheel electric personnel carriers provided for in the purchase contract authorized by the Boards, action of December 13, 1949, awarding purchase Specification No. A-148 to %arrior Manufacturing Company, in the net remaining amount of $107,271.00 plus sales tax, based on breach of contract and non-performance by the vendor. (2) Consideration of motion authorizing and directing the General Counsel to institute legal proceedings against Fleet Equipment Corporation (formerly Rarrior Manufacturing Company) , if determined upon further investigation to be appropriate, to recover payment and damages for eleven (,11 ) four-wheel personnel carriers delivered and paid for pursuant to Specification No. A-148 and subsequently determined to be of poor workmanship and unsafe to operate. [ITEM (9 ) (a) CONTINUED ON PAGE 41 -3- 8/08/90 (9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (a) (Continued from page 3) `../� ( 3) Consideration of motion cancelling the purchase contract authorized by the Boards ' action of December 13, 1989, awarding Purchase Specification No. A-149 to Karrior Manufacturing Company, in the total amount of $55,411.20 plus sales tax, based on breach of contract and non-performance by the vendor. (4 ) Consideration of motion awarding balance of purchase contract for Specification No. A-148 to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company, as a substitute vendor for the original defaulting vendor for the completion of the contract on the same terms and conditions, to wit: delivery of 29 personnel carriers at the same unit price, for the total amount of $107,271.00 plus sales tax. (5) Consideration of motion awarding purchase contract for Specification No. A-149 to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company, as a substitute vendor for the original defaulting vendor for the performance of the entire contract on the same terms and conditions, to wit: delivery of 13 cargo carriers at the same unit price, for the total amount of $55,411.20 plus sales tax. (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-97, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Anionic Polyelectrolyte Chemical Polymer, Specification No. P-120, to Callaway Chemical Company, Division of Exxon Chemical Company, for the price of $.865 per wet pound, plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning September 1, 1990, with provision for four one-year extensions upon mutually-agreeable terms (Estimated annual cost $181,027.20 plus sales tax) . See page "C" (c) Consideration of the following actions relative to Purchase of Caustic Soda Solution, Specification No. P-121 : (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from HoltraChem west, Inc. dated July 16, 1990, the apparent low bidder, requesting that they be allowed to withdraw their bid for said material due to a mathematical error. See page "D" —i [ITEM (9) (c) CONTINUED ON PAGE 5] -4- 8/08/90 (9 ) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (c) (Continued from page 4) �./ (2) Consideration of motion approving request of HoltraChem West, Inc. for withdrawal of their bid. (3 ) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-98, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Caustic Soda Solution, Specification No. P-121, to Western States Chemical Supply Corporation, for the price of $348.49 per dry ton, plus freight and sales tax, for a one-year period beginning September 1, 1990, with provision for a one-year extension (Estimated costs to be shared as follows: ) See page "E., Treatment Trunk Plants Sewers Total Joint Districts $523,273.50 $436,061.25 $ 959,334.75 District 3 Only -- 436,061.25 436,061 .25 $523 ,273.50 $872,122.50 $1, 395, 396.00 (d) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17 , authorizing a net addition of $57 ,876. 31 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for six items of additional work or deletions. See page "F" (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications for Warehouse and Maintenance Building and Oil Storage and Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20, authorizing an addition of $30,840.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for eight items of additional work, and granting a time extension of eight calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page „G,. ( f) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Gas Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-1, authorizing a net addition of $35 ,609 .00 to the contract with Ziebarth & Alper _. for six items of additional work or deletions. See page "H" �� _5_ 8/08/90 (9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (g) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-99, accepting Rehabilitation of Digesters 7 and 8 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-1, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "I" (h) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-100, approving Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. for design and construction services required for Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-25; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-26; Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33; and Improvements to Grit Facility "B" , Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure "A", Job No. P2-34, providing for a reallocation of the costs among categories within said agreement, with no change in the maximum authorized compensation of $892,708.00. See page "J" ( i) Consideration of the following actions relative to Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers for design and construction services required for Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33, providing for additional construction support services, preparation of an amendment to the Operations and Maintenance Manual, and start-up and training services, and reducing subconsultant fees previously authorized: (1 ) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for said additional services. See page "V (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-101, approving Addendum No. 3 to said Agreement with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers for said additional services and reduction in subconsultant fees, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, for an additional amount not to exceed $123 ,400.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $1,064,500.00 to an amount not to exceed $1 ,187,900.00. See page "L" -6- 8/08/90 (9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (j ) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate a �i Professional Services Agreement for engineering and environmental services for preparation of a Project Report, Supplement No. 2 to the Program Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, and for design and construction support services relative to Primary Clarifiers 16-27 and Related Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-37. (k) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to employ a Financial Manager at the top step of the salary range (currently $5,669 .00 per month) for this position classification to work in the Districts' Finance Division. (1) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to employ a Laboratory Manager at the top step of the salary range (currently $5,592.00 per month) for this position classification to work in the Districts' Technical Services/Laboratory Division. DISTRICT 2 (m) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate a Professional Services Agreement for preparation of a Project Report for Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1. (n) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Willdan Associates for design and construction services required for Portion of Euclid Interceptor, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-3, and Ratella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-28, to provide for additional design services necessary to incorporate changes recommended by CALTRANS and the Cities of Anaheim and Fullerton, and for other miscellaneous services required re Contract No. 2-26-3. (o) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-113-2, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex 6 .687 acres of territory to the District located in the vicinity of Sycamore Street and Santiago Boulevard in the City of Villa Park (proposed Annexation No. 72 - Trider Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2) . See page ..M. 8/O8/90 (9) DISTRICT 5 - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (p) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Improvements to eayslde Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 2, Contract No. 5-34-2, authorizing an addition of $28,803.00 to the contract with Keako, Inc., dba MCGrand 6 Associates, for two items of additional work, and granting a time extension of six calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page "N" DISTRICT 6 (q) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-114-6, approving Agreement between County Sanitation District No. 6, Costa Mesa Sanitary District and the 32nd Agricultural Disttict, providing for the transfer of ownership and/or abandonment of sewers and easements within and adjacent to the Orange County Fairgrounds from District No. 6 to the Costa Mesa Sanitary District and the 32nd Agricultural District. See page .0" DISTRICTS 7 6 14 (r) Consideration of motion approving Change order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road (and City of Costa Mesa street improvements) , Contract No. 14-1-1B, authorizing an addition of $94,697.00 to the contract with Steve Bubalo Construction Co . for ten items of additional work. See page P. (s) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Kathleen P. Landers dated June 24, 1990, \ftw/ in the amount of $650.50 for alleged damages to her vehicle incurred in connection with construction of Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road (and City of Costa Mesa street improvements) , Contract No. 14-1-1B, and refer to the Districts General Counsel, liability claims administrator, contractor and contractor's insurance company for appropriate action. DISTRICT 7 (t) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Abandonment of Lane Road Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-1, and Abandonment of Castlerock and Dow Avenue Pump Stations and Modifications to MacArthur Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-3, authorizing an addition of $24,319.00 to the contract with Colich 6 Sons (Jv) for four items of additional work, and granting a time extension of seven calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page .0. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consif ern of action on items deleted from Consent �.►� Calendar, if any -8- 8/08/90 (11) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of the following resolutions establishing (�� 1990-91 charges for Class I, Class II and Class III Rol Vft permittees, pursuant to provisions of the uniform Ordinance Ina riCat BOt Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage �.,p^--•--^ Facilities of the respective Districts. See page "R" 1990-91 INDUSTRIAL USER RATES Class I 6 II Fees Class III Fee Dist. No. Resolution No. Flow(*) S.S. (*) B.O.D. (*) Few(*) 1 90-102-1 $186.80 $154.58 $120.98 $ 761 . 33 2 90-103-2 182.59 154.58 120.98 757.12 3 90-104-3 214.53 154.58 120.98 789.06 5 90-105-5 230.18 154.58 120.98 804.71 6 90-106-6 191.81 154.58 120.98 766. 34 7 90-107-7 247.23 154.58 120.98 821.77 11 90-108-11 252.94 154.58 120.98 827.47 13 90-109-13 430.64 154.58 120.98 1,005.17 14 90-110-14 344.75 154.58 120.98 919.28 *Flow - Per million gallons of flow *S.S. - Per thousand pounds of suspended solids . *B.O.D. - Per thousand pounds of biochemical oxygen demand (12) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee's written report of the meeting on July 26, 1990 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) (13) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Report of the Building Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee's written report of the meeting on July 31, 1990 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) (b) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 18 to the plans and specifications for Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4, authorizing an addition of $240,000.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corp. to provide interim funding for Phases 2, 3 and 4 additional framing and concrete, heating and air conditioning, electrical, fire protection, plumbing, painting, plaster and stucco, insulation, and sheet metal and roof work, as recommended by the Building Committee. -9- 8/08/90 ( 14 ) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee' s written report of the meeting on July 25, 1990 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) . (b) Consideration of action on items recommended by said Committee: ( 1 ) Consideration of the following actions relative to selection of underwriter and bond counsel for the Districts' long-range financing and borrowing program: Roll CafiVote (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-111, or Cast designating and appointing Merrill Lynch Capital Unanimous Balh Markets as the Senior Manager/Underwriter for the Districts ' proposed long-term securities debt issue program. See page Is., (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-112, �IICad1✓ote approving a Professional Services Agreement Or Cast with the law firms of Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander a Pardon and Rourke 6 Woodruff to Unanimous Ballot serve as co-Bond Counsel for the Districts' proposed long-term securities debt issue program. See page "T" ( 2) Consideration of the following actions relative to the purchase of surface easements and sub-surface oil and mineral rights at Treatment Plant No. 2: (a) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager and General Counsel to offer to purchase oil facilities, leases and mineral rights at the appraisal prices from the following: ( 1 ) D. W. Elliott ( 2) County of Orange ( 3 ) Pacific Energy Resources (Raralas Lease) (4 ) Lessor Group ( 5) Overriding Royalty Owners (b) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Counsel to institute eminent domain proceedings against operators or leaseholders, if necessary. (c) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to solicit proposals for the preparation of plans and specifications for abandonment and removal of the oil facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2. (ITEM ( 14) (b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 11] -10- 8/08/90 (14) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 10) (b) ( 3) Consideration of the following actions relative to prequalification of suppliers and/or prepurchase of certain major items of equipment: (a) Consideration of motion approving prequalification of the following suppliers of influent pumps and variable frequency drives required in connection with Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-1 : Influent Pumps: (1) Fairbanks-Morse (2) Allis Chalmers ( 3) Patterson (4) Gould Variable Frequency Drives: (1) Westinghouse (2) Brown Boveri ( 3) Ross Hill (4) Toshiba (5) Allen-Bradley (6) General Electric (7) Louis Allis (b) Consideration of motion authorizing staff �...� to negotiate with Parkson Corporation for the sole source purchase of Wyss aeration diffusers for use in Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36. (c) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to negotiate with The Budd Company for the sole source purchase of sludge collectors for use in Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2. (d) Consideration of motion approving prequalification of the following suppliers of computers and associated equipment that will interface with the Districts, existing equipment required in connection with Plant 1 Control Center Instrumentation, Job No. J-23-2, and Replacement of Computerized Monitoring System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-44: (1) Bailey Controls (2) Allen-Bradley ( 3) Fischer 6 Porter (4) Johnson Yokogawa Corp. (5) Westinghouse -11- 8/08/90 (15) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of the following actions relative to preparation of Supplement No. 1 to the Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, required to assess the impacts resulting from construction of the Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9 : (a) Verbal staff report (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment relative to said Job No. I-9, finding that said project could have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, an Environmental Impact Report will be required. See pages U. and V. (c) Consideration of motion authorizing preparation of Draft Supplement No. 1 to the Program EIR for the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Faculties Master Plan, and authorizing circulation for public review in compliance with CEQA requirements. (16) ALL DISTRICTS Closed Session: During the course of conducting the usiness se forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards, the Chairman may convene the Boards in closed session to consider matters of �✓ pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956 .9 or 54957 .6. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employee compensation; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as final actions are taken by the Directors on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary (b) Reconvene in regular session (c) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session. (17) ALL DISTRICTS o er usiness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any -12- - 8/08/90 (18) DISTRICT 1 0 er usinesa and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (19) DISTRICT 1 Con�Te—ration of motion to adjourn (20) DISTRICT 2 O i— eft ups iness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 2 Con�tion of motion to adjourn (22) DISTRICT 3 O er usinesa and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (23) DISTRICT 3 Canal of motion to adjourn (24) DISTRICT 5 0 i r usiness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (25) DISTRICT 5 Con�Te—ration of motion to adjourn (26) DISTRICT 6 O er usiness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (27) DISTRICT 6 Conssorat ion of motion to adjourn (28) DISTRICT 7 0 er usiness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (29) DISTRICT 7 Consul oration of motion to adjourn ( 30) DISTRICT 11 OEhee 65--sIness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 31) DISTRICT 11 Con�Te—ration of motion to adjourn ( 32) DISTRICT 13 , Oder bus ness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 33 ) DISTRICT 13 Con�r-aEion of motion to adjourn (34) DISTRICT 14 OTE-e-r-Fu—siness and communications or supplemental agenda Stems, if any ( 35) DISTRICT 14 Cons era ion of motion to adjourn -13- ' I MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127.10844 EIIIS Avenue of Orange County, California Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 JOINT BOARDS MEETING DATE August 8. 1990 at 7:30 non. The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting. ALL DISTRICTS 9(a) : ACTIONS RE PURCHASE OF FORTY (40) FOUR-WHEEL ELECTRIC PERSONNEL CARRIERS. SPECIFICATION NO. A-148: AND THIRTEEN 13) FOUR-WHEEL ELECTRIC CARGO CARRIERS- SPECIFICATION NO. A-149. ..i The Districts utilize electric carts to transport personnel and equipment for operational and maintenance activities on the sites of the two, expansive treatment plants. Last year, as part of our air quality efforts, staff proposed the retirement of 53 motor vehicles used for these purposes, to be replaced with electric carts. In November 1989, bids were received and opened from three vendors for Purchase of Forty (40) Four-Wheel Electric Personnel Carriers, Specification No. A-148; and Thirteen (13) Four-Wheel Electric Cargo Carriers, Specification No. A-149. The award of both purchases was made at the December 1989 Board meeting to the low bidder, Karrior Manufacturing Company, in the amounts of $147,960.00 and $55,411.20, plus sales tax, respectively. Since the award date, Karrior Manufacturing has been purchased by Fleet Equipment Corporation and Fleet assumed the contract obligations from Karrior. Deliveries of the fifty-three (53) electric carts were to be completed by March 30, 1990. As of May 23, 1990, the Districts received and paid for only eleven (11) personnel carriers. After placing the eleven units into operation, various complaints were turned in by the drivers. These complaints included locking brakes, too much play in the steering, and too little ground clearance in the front end. Based on this recent experience, these carts are considered unsafe for operation. Fleet Equipment Corporation (Fleet/Karrior) was notified several times about the poor workmanship and quality of these carts and Fleet/Karrior assured the Districts' Purchasing Manager that they would make good on the carts. August 8, 1990 In May 1990, redesigned carts of each type were delivered for our inspection and approval . However, after close scrutiny and testing, we determined that the workmanship was not acceptable in terms of quality and safety. Fleet/Karrior was immediately informed of this situation and was told by Districts' staff to discontinue production. We further advised Fleet/Karrior that cancellation procedures for the two electric cart purchase contracts would begin immediately. Fleet/Karrior was further advised that it was our intent to return the eleven vehicles received for a full refund. Staff and the General Counsel 's office have been working on this matter for several months. It is recommended that action be taken on the purchase order contracts to Fleet Equipment Corporation (formerly Karrior Manufacturing) for Purchase of Forty (40) Four-Wheel Electric Personnel Carriers, Bid Specification No. A-148, cancelling the remaining 29 personnel carriers; and for Purchase of Thirteen (13) Four-Wheel Electric Cargo Carriers, Bid Specification No. A-149, cancelling the entire order. The recommended actions are based on breach of contract and non-performance by the vendor. It is further recommended that General Counsel be authorized and directed to institute appropriate proceedings to recover damages from Fleet Equipment Corporation for the eleven (11) personnel carriers delivered and paid for and subsequently determined to be defective. Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company was the second low bidder for the electric carts to be acquired pursuant to Specification Nos. A-148 and A-149. Our Purchasing Manager has contacted Taylor-Dunn and they have offered to supply the carts at the same price quoted by the original low bidder, Fleet/Karrior. Staff is, therefore, further recommending that award now be made to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company for purchase of the remaining twenty-nine (29) Four-Wheel Electric Personnel Carriers, provided for under Specification No. A-148, in the amount of $107,271.00 plus sales tax; and purchase of the entire Thirteen (13) Four-Wheel Electric Cargo Carriers, provided for under Specification No. A-149, in the amount of $55,411.20 plus sales tax. (Both of these awards are at (the original bid prices from Karrior Manufacturing Company.) 9(b) : AWARD PURCHASE OF ANIONIC POLYELECTROLYTE CHEMICAL POLYMER, BID SPECIFICATION NO. P-120. Anionic polymer is used as a chemical coagulant along with ferric chloride in the advanced primary treatment of wastewater to aid in the treatment process, and in the control of hydrogen sulfide in the anaerobic digestion of sludge. Advanced primary treatment is a cost-effective means of enhancing the removal of solids and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) from the wastewater and, thus, aids in meeting the NPDES ocean discharge limits. It also reduces digester gas hydrogen sulfide levels. The current contract for supplying polymer is expiring and bids for a new contract have been solicited. Five chemical vendors were prequalified by laboratory testing. Because the performance characteristics of each product differ, bid quantities of polymer to be supplied also differ and were specified for each vendor as determined by the lab testing. The polymer sample provided by the vendors for trial in the prequalification process must exactly match the respective polymer proposed by the bidders for use under the purchase contract specifications. -2- August 8, 1990 Based on the above requirements, four bids were received. The high bid was $240,272.80, and the low bid was $181,027.20 for the estimated annual usage of anionic polymer. The estimated total annual cost of anionic polymer for physical/chemical treatment under the new bid is 15% lower than the current contract because of increased polymer efficiency. Staff recommends a contract be awarded to Calloway Chemical Company, the low bidder, for the price of $0.865 per wet pound, for a one-year period commencing September 1, 1990, for an estimated cost of $181,027.20, plus applicable sales tax; with provisions for four one-year extension periods upon mutually agreeable terms. 9(c) : AWARD PURCHASE OF CAUSTIC SODA SOLUTION. SPECIFICATION NO. P-121. Caustic soda is used for treatment of malodorous air in the collection system and processing of wastewater at Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2. The Treatment Plant Odor Abatement Program, which consists of 33 air scrubbing systems utilizing caustic soda at Plants 1 and 2, requires an estimated 1,350 dry tons per year. The Trunk Sewer Odor Abatement Program uses 2,250 dry tons annually. This program was implemented in the District No. 3 interceptor sewer system in May 1985 with considerable success in reducing the hydrogen sulfide levels in the pipeline. The Boards have previously approved sharing the costs between the Joint Districts and District No. 3 for the Trunk Sewer Odor Abatement Program because of benefits also derived at the Joint Treatment Works(50% to be paid by District No. 3 and 50% by the Joint Districts) . Caustic soda is presently added to the Miller-Holder and the Knott trunk sewers. Caustic soda is derived from ethylene and chlorine manufacturing. Ethylene is used in all plastic materials and is still considered in short supply; however, the demand for chlorine is diminishing. The current availability of caustic soda and stabilization of prices appear to be more favorable than they have been the past few years. Vendors are now able to propose a firm price for one year, whereas on the last two contracts we could only obtain firm quoted prices for quarterly and semi-annual periods, respectively. On July 10, 1990 four bids were received for the purchase of 3,600 dry tons of caustic soda over a one-year period, the estimated amount required for infection in District 3 trunk sewers and for the Districts' air scrubbers located at the treatment plants. The four bids received ranged from a high cost per dry ton, excluding freight and sales tax, of $372.00 to a low of $324.64. On July 16, six days after the bid opening, Holtrachem West, Inc., the low bidder, requested their bid be withdrawn due to an error. Staff and Counsel have reviewed the request and it appears to be legitimate. Holtrachem used an incorrect solution ratio in calculating their bid. Based on the Districts' annual expected usage of 3,600 dry tons, Western States Chemical Corporation is now the lowest responsible bidder at a cost of $348.49 per dry ton for an estimated annual expenditure of approximately $1,395,396.00, including freight and taxes. -3- August 8, 1990 Total costs for the annual period are to be shared as follows: Treatment Trunk Plants Sewers Total Joint Districts $523,273.50 $436,061.25 $ 959,334.75 District 3 Only -0- 436,061.25 436 061.25 Totals: $523,273.50 $872,122.50 $1,395,396.00 Staff and Counsel recommend that the bid of Holtrachem West, Inc., be allowed to be withdrawn due to the error; and that award of the contract for Purchase of Caustic Soda Solution be made to Western States Chemical Corporation, the lowest responsible bidder, for their proposed amount of $348.49 per dry ton, plus freight and sales tax, for a one-year period, beginning September 1, 1990, with provision for a one-year contract extension upon mutually agreeable terns. 9(d) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17. Job No. J-17, Central Laboratory, provides for the construction of a new laboratory, upgrading of the site paving, and provisions for additional parking at a cost of $7,090,000.00. Change Order No. 2 consists of six items of work for a net addition of $57,876.31 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation. Item 1 changes the specified electrical rigid conduit and aluminum boxes to ENT conduit and pressed steel boxes for concealed raceway installations which resulted in a credit of $21,345.00. Item 2 revised the fire alarm smoke detectors from the implied duct detector with sampling tubes to standard industry ionization smoke detectors which resulted in a credit of $5,000.00. Item 3 deleted the lightning protection in its entirety which resulted in a credit of $12,615.00. Item 4 is a request from the Contractor to use Fuseal in lieu of Duriron or glass-lined pipe for above and below grade waste and vent piping (except at toilets) which results in a credit of $19,000.00. Item 5 adds underground hot water and chilled water piping to serve the Central Laboratory from the existing Chiller Building (south of the east-west circulation road and east of Primary Clarifier No. 3) at a cost of $114,470.31. This item, needed now, was previously scheduled to be completed under a separate contract and is a shift from Job No. J-19-1 to this contract. Item 6 is for the change in sizes of angle braces at six locations for an additional cost of $1,366.00. The above-described changes are considered by the staff to be items which would have been included in the original design if discovered or known prior to completion. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 for a net addition of $57,876.31 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation. There is no time extension associated with this change order. -4- \/ August 8, 1990 9(e) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 6 TO WAREHOUSE AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING. AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING IMPROVEMENTS JOB NO. J-20. Job No. J-20, Warehouse and Maintenance Building, and Oil Storage and Dispensing Improvements, includes the construction of eight warehouse and maintenance buildings, remodeling of the existing oil storage facility and site paving, and storm drain and fire protection systems at a cost of $3.4 million. Change Order No. 6 adds $30,840.00 and eight calendar days to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation. Item 1 directed the contractor to revise and add heating and ventilating ductwork in the new Maintenance Building to future heating system in the upstairs bathroom areas. Duct rerouting was also required to avoid conflict with the jib crane boom. This additional work was not included in the contract and resulted in an additional cost of $3,026.00. Item 2 resulted in an additional cost of $996.00 to rework the jib crane being installed on the first floor of the new Maintenance Building. The height of the crane, shown in the contract specifications, had to be lowered in order not to interfere with building structural framing members. Item 3 added plywood wall covering to cover insulated walls in one of the large enclosed warehouse buildings where none was specified in the contract. It was necessary to cover the exposed, unfaced fiberglass insulation and plywood was found to be the most economical method. This item added $9,601.00 to the contract. Item 4 directed the Contractor to place an additional 1/2-inch of roof ..� insulation over the existing Auto Shop roof insulation. The existing roofing material could not be removed without damaging the underlying insulation. Upon inspection of the roof, the roofing material manufacturer's representative required the additional layer of insulation in order to provide a flat even surface to lay the new roof. Additional costs of furnishing and installing the insulation added $3,388.00 to the contract. Item 5 adds three water valve vaults for access and protection of new valves installed on the site fire protection water system. The vaults were not included in the contract and added $5,205.00. Item 6 adds $1,087.00 to the contract for additional tile wainscot in the men's and women's shower areas of the new Maintenance Building. The tile wainscot shown on the contract drawings was incomplete and would have resulted in future cleaning and maintenance problems. Item 7 directed the Contractor to modify the toilet compartment partitions in the men's and women's bathrooms on the second floor of the Maintenance Building. The specified toilet compartments could not be anchored to the combination plywood/thin concrete floor without additional bracing, adding $667.00 to the contract. Item 8 added a cost of $6,880.00 for plumbing changes and modifications to Building No. 6 not included in the contract. These included a hot water recirculation system to save water due to the extremely long pipe runs inside the building; rerouting of plumbing around building structural members and supports; adding and modifying condensate drains for the water heater and roof-mounted air conditioning units and installing a future gas heater outlet. -5- August 8, 1990 The above-described changes are considered by staff to be corrections which would have been included in the original design if discovered or known prior to its completion. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 6 adding $30,840.00 and eight calendar days to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation. 9(f) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-34-1. Job No. P1-34-1, Gas Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, includes the construction of a new city water pump station, a new power building, and a new gas compressor building at a cost of $13.1 million. The contract also includes supplying and installing three reciprocating compressors at Plant No. 1, and supplying three reciprocating compressors at Plant No. 2 for future installation by others. Change Order No. 2 adds six items of work and $35,609.00 to the contract. Item 1 provides joint payment and bonding for the manufacture of the six gas compressors. Normally, payment is made only to the contractor upon delivery of equipment. However, the manufacturer has requested a payment schedule commensurate with the progress of the work because the compressors constitute a large portion (approximately one-third) of the contract. This change order item allows payment of the cost of the compressors (;3,874,632.00) in accordance with the schedule set forth in the change order to both the general contractor (Ziebarth & Alper) and the compressor manufacturer (Cooper Industries) in 25% increments as the compressors are designed, supplied, assembled, and installed. The Districts will require a surety bond satisfactory to General Counsel to ensure that delivery of the equipment will be made. The partial payments on the compressors are to be paid separate from the contract's normal progress payments. This item results in a deduction in the amount of $5,000.00 from the contract to pay for added accounting, off-site inspection, and expenses incurred for issuing the partial payments and accepting the surety. Item 2, in the amount of $28,165.00, is for the relocation of the potable water supply to the existing Control Center through Tunnel No. 3 and replacement of area paving. The potable water supply was originally routed through Tunnel No. 6 which was demolished in this contract. Item 3, which is a deduction of $1,018.00, is for substitution of ball valves for plug valves at all pressure gauge assemblies as requested by the Plant Maintenance Department. Item 4, in the amount of ;1,614.00, is for the rerouting to Tunnel No. 8 of a sump pump discharge line that was routed through Tunnel No. 6 which was demolished under this contract. Item 5, in the amount of $9,619.00, is for the demolition of undisclosed utilities located below grade in the area of the Power Building 5 excavation. Item 6, in the amount of $2,229.00, is for the color coding of the Industrial Water, Plant Water, and Potable Water systems installed under this contract. The original contract specifies that all of these systems are to be painted one color. The above described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items are for replaced work. -6- August 8, 1990 Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 for a net addition of $35,609.00 to the contract with Ziebarth & Alper. There is no time extension associated with this change order. 9(g) : ACCEPTANCE OF REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS 7 AND 8 RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-35-1. AS COMPLETE. In March 1989, the Directors awarded Job No. P1-35-1 to S. A. Healy Company for the rehabilitation of two digesters at Reclamation Plant No. 1. The work included the installation of high-rate sludge mixing systems to improve digester mixing, insulation of the domes to prevent heat loss, installation of a liner, and other general improvements. The job is now complete. S. A. Healy Company has fulfilled all contractual obligations within the specified and extended time. Staff, therefore, recommends adoption of the resolution attached to the agenda material , authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the Final Closeout Agreement and filing of the required Notice of Completion. The final project cost is $2,411,915.00. 9(h) : APPROVE ADDENDUM NO. 4 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MALCOLM PIRNIE. INC. RE COVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-25: FOUL AIR SCRUBBER SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P1-26: COVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-32: FOUL AIR SCRUBBER SYSTEMS AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-33: AND IMPROVEMENTS TO GRIT FACILITY B. BILLINGS TUNNEL AND DISTRIBUTION STRUCTURE A. JOB NO. P2-34. The professional services agreement approved in 1985 with Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. included preparation of plans and specifications, construction services, preparation of operations and maintenance manuals, and training seminars for the major odor control projects at Plants 1 and 2. The construction portion of the projects is complete and the Engineer is preparing the final billing. Their accounting has shown that the direct expense amount is less than anticipated but the labor hours were slightly more than budgeted. Therefore, a request has been received to transfer $4,622.00 from the Direct Expenses category to the Direct Labor category, with no increase in the maximum contract amount of $892,708.00. Staff recommends approval of Addendum No. 4 authorizing the reallocation of funds within the previously authorized contract amount. 9(i) : RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH LEE AND RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR PRIMARY CLARIFIERS NOS. 6-15 AND RELATED FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-33. In January 1988, the Directors approved a professional services agreement with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers to prepare plans and specifications for 60 mgd of new primary clarifiers and related facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1. The project is now under construction, at a cost of approximately $4 million. The fast-paced project is requiring more construction support services by the consultant than envisioned when the design contract was awarded. Additional time has been required for consultation and clarifications, submittal review of the complex systems, continuing support requested by the construction management team including site visits and attending bi-weekly coordination meetings, additional as-built drawings, preparation of an amendment to the operations and maintenance manual , and start-up training. -7- August 8, 1990 The consultant requested a fee extension of $195,940 for the required additional engineering services. However, the Selection Committee has negotiated with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers for Addendum No. 3, providing for the additional work described above, in the amount of $123,400.00, based on hourly rates plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants fees and fixed profit, as follows: Change Existing per Amended Agreement Addn. No. 3 Agreement Professional Services, (hourly rates including labor plus overhead at 135%). not to exceed $ 875,759 $150,000 $1.025.759 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 13,582 4,400 17,982 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 80,000 (31,000) 49.000 Fixed Profit 95,159 -0- 95,159 $1,064,500 $123,400 $1,187,900 The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and adoption of a resolution approving Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the supporting documents. 9(j) : AUTHORIZE SELECTION COMMITTEE TO SOLICIT PROPOSALS AND NEGOTIATE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES RE PRIMARY CLARIFIERS 16-27 AND RELATED FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. PI-37. The Master Plan approved by the Directors in July 1989 recommended expansion of the Plant No. I Primary Clarifiers to accommodate 240 million gallons per day (mgd) by the year 2020. Completion of Job No. P1-33, the construction of 60 mgd of primary treatment now under construction will provide a total plant capacity of 108 mgd, with no allowance for standby primary treatment. Job No. P1-37 is planned to provide an additional 72 mgd capacity. The 1989 Master Plan called for the start of the design and construction of a 36 mgd expansion of primary capacity at Reclamation Plant No. 1 in 1990, and the start of a second 36 m9d capacity expansion in 1994. At Treatment Plant No. 2, a 24 mgd master-planned primary capacity expansion is called out to be started in 1990. Staff believes that because of the long lead time now required to obtain the necessary construction permits, coupled with the necessary CEQA documentation, design and construction, this project will take at least four years to complete. Staff is, therefore, recommending that both Plant No. 1 units be combined and that work begin immediately on a 72 mgd primary treatment �..i -8- August 8, 1990 capacity expansion at Plant No. 1. A determination on whether to phase the construction will be made at a later date. Because of other permitting issues �.. at Plant No. 2, it is further recommended that the permitting, design and construction of additional facilities at Plant No. 2 be delayed a couple of years. The 72 mgd expansion at Plant No. 1 will include the addition of 12 primary basins, power distribution modifications, additional foul air scrubbing equipment and chemical treatment facilities. The basins will be covered and used for Districts' equipment and employee parking. The current estimate for this project is $32,000,000 with construction to begin in January 1992. Staff is recommending that the Selection Committee be authorized to solicit a proposal and negotiate a professional services agreement for engineering and environmental services. Following the Selection Committee's negotiations, the agreement will be presented to the Boards for consideration. 9(k) : AUTHORIZING EMPLOYMENT OF FINANCIAL MANAGER AT TOP OF SALARY RANGE. During the Fiscal Policy Committee evaluation of strategies for capital borrowing over the next 30 years, proposed by the "2020 VISION" Financial Plan, to partially finance the Districts' $1.5 billion master plan of sewerage facilities, the Committee proposed, and the Boards approved, the creation of a new Financial Manager position. This position was established to provide the needed in-house expertise to manage our anticipated long-range participation in the debt markets. The Financial Manager will assist the Director of Finance and work closely with bond underwriters and counsel in administering the financial plan, issuing securities and managing the proceeds for financing major portions of the Districts' master-planned facilities expansion program. Since the Joint Boards authorized the position in April 1990, we have been recruiting and interviewing candidates from the financial community, other governmental agencies, auditing and accounting firms, consulting firms and current employees. Because of the magnitude and imminent timing of the Districts' borrowing, we have concentrated on experienced and proven candidates. Over the past month, staff has been negotiating with a very qualified candidate. This applicant has ten years of experience in the municipal borrowing field, including eight years with the County of Orange in both the Bond/Capital Financing Program and the Office of Management and Budget. She has been employed by a national independent financial advisory firm for the past two years and is currently an Assistant Vice President. She is the Project Manager responsible for numerous California clients including the County of Orange, Orange County Flood Control District, Orange Unified School District, City of Riverside and the County of Sacramento. In addition, she has co-managed numerous projects and financings and developed a specialized expertise in infrastructure financing, fiscal policies and long-range financial planning. The candidate's educational background includes a BA in Economics and a Masters in Planning and Public Administration. Several Directors expressed concern during the position approval process that the salary level established for the Financial Manager was not high enough to attract sufficiently skilled and experienced candidates, and many potential �..i candidates have declined further discussion after the salary range was -9- August 8, 1990 disclosed. Of those applicants completely evaluated and interviewed by a panel that included non-Districts' staff, this candidate is clearly the most qualified. However, her current salary not only exceeds what staff is authorized to offer (mid-point of the range), but it also exceeds the top of the range for Financial Manager. Staff is therefore requesting authority to fill the position of Financial Manager at the top step of the salary range (currently $5,669 per month). 9(1) : AUTHORIZING EMPLOYMENT OF LABORATORY MANAGER AT TOP OF SALARY RANGE. The Laboratory Division is responsible for performing chemical analyses of air, wastewater, sludge and ocean water in support of the various activities of the Sanitation Districts. These activities include: industrial source monitoring, influent and effluent wastewater characterization, sludge quality monitoring for reuse purposes, and ocean water chemical and bacterial quality. Thirty-one people are currently employed in the Laboratory. The Boards have recently approved the 1990-91 Budget which increases the authorized staffing level from 33 to 38 individuals. This additional staffing is necessary to accommodate the additional impact of emerging regulatory requirements on the Sanitation Districts. We have been recruiting to fill the Laboratory Manager's position since the beginning of 1990. After screening the applicants, five individuals were selected for first-round interviews. Three of these applicants were then interviewed by a five-person panel which included members that were not Districts' staffers. The candidate that was ultimately selected for the position has excellent qualifications by virtue of schooling (Doctorate in chemistry) and experience (14 years in chemistry). He has also taken ongoing course work at UCLA in toxic and hazardous materials control and management; has extensive experience in organizing and managing laboratories; has experience in pure and applied research and technology; and in analytical chemistry, physical testing, metallurgy, and problem solving. The candidate is currently earning considerably more than the Districts' staff is authorized to offer (mid-point of the salary range) . Staff is, therefore, requesting authorization to employ him as a Laboratory Manager at the top of the salary range (currently $5,592 per month) . DISTRICT 2 9(m) : AUTHORIZE SELECTION COMMITTEE TO SOLICIT PROPOSALS AND NEGOTIATE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR PREPARATION OF A PROJECT REPORT RE REHABILITATION OF CYPRESS AVENUE SUBTRUNK SEWER. CONTRACT NO. 2-9-R1. The Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9, was completed in February 1961 from Yorba Linda Boulevard to Imperial Highway, following the natural drainage of the area. The pipe, installed in the low-lying area of the drainage course, is an 18-inch V.C.P. in the lower reach and 15-inch V.C.P. in the upper reach. The original plans show little development adjacent to the pipe encasements. However, because adjacent development has subsequently occurred and is continuing to occur in this area, the lower-lying areas of the drainage course are slowly being filled which overburdens and causes structural stress on the existing pipe. The result of this is that the existing vitrified `� -10- August 8, 1990 clay line is cracked and broken, requiring portions of the sewer line to be replaced and/or relocated. Maintenance access is also limited, both by encroaching development and by lack of access easements. Staff is therefore recommending that an engineering project report be prepared that would include aerial maps to be used in preparing a new plan and profile, a review of access to the line at all locations to determine need for improved manhole access or relocation, review the video tapes taken of the interior of the sewer, a recommendation and delineation of areas where repairs are needed, a recommendation on the method of repair, a review of existing and proposed development with the property owners and the applicable public planning departments to determine potential future impacts, a review the 1989 master plan projections for the sewer line, and cost estimates for project and necessary rights-of-way and easements. Staff is recommending that the Selection Committee be authorized to solicit proposals and negotiate a professional services agreement for the preparation of the project report. Following the Selection Committee's negotiations, the proposed agreement will be presented to the Directors for consideration. 9(n) : AUTHORIZE SELECTION COMMITTEE TO NEGOTIATE ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WILLDAN ASSOCIATES FOR PORTION OF EUCLID INTERCEPTOR SEWER. CONTRACT NO. 2-26-3. AND KATELLA RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-28. In September 1988, the Directors awarded a professional services agreement for preparation of plans and specifications for the final reach of the ..� new Euclid Interceptor sewer system, beginning at Broadway in the City of Anaheim and extending northerly to Orangethorpe Avenue in the City of Fullerton. The contract was amended in November 1989 to provide for alignment changes requested by the City of Fullerton, the inclusion of local sewers and the abandonment of an old sewer. The plans and specifications were approved by the Directors in June of this year, and the project is now nearly ready for bidding. In the last few months, there were several changes which impacted the scope of work for this project, including several alignment studies necessary for the crossing of the Santa Ana Freeway required by CALTRANS. CALTRANS was opposed to the tunneling and Willdan, together with District staff, put in a considerable amount of work to secure the necessary permits. As part of that effort, the crossing of the existing Euclid Trunk Sewer at the Santa Ana Freeway was found to be damaged and the repair of that line was included within the contract documents. Another large impact was the considerable public information effort necessary to secure the permit from the City of Anaheim. Presentations were made with the Chamber of Commerce and the business community along Euclid Street to solicit their input. That input was ultimately incorporated within the design of the sewer line and the specifications for the construction. Finally, extra drawings were needed for minor changes to District and City of Fullerton sewers, including replacement of city sewers which added design effort. The largest single change involved traffic control plans which required seven additional sheets of plans. �.i -11- August 8, 1990 Staff is therefore recommending that the Selection Committee be authorized to negotiate an addendum for the additional professional services for the design of Portion of the Euclid Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-26-3. Following the Selection Committee's negotiations, the proposed addendum will be presented to the Board for consideration. 9(o) : INITIATE PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION NO. 72 - TRIDER ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2. In February the Directors received a petition from the Trider Corporation to annex 6.687 acres of territory located in the vicinity of Sycamore Street and Santiago Boulevard in the City of Villa Park. The property is currently uninhabited but ten single family residences are proposed. This annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange re AB 8 tax exchanges for annexing properties. The local sewering agency is the City of Villa Park. Staff recommends approval of the resolution included with the agenda material initiating proceedings for said Annexation No. 72 - Trider Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. DISTRICT 5 9(p) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO BAYSIDE DRIVE TRUNK SEWER, PHASE 2. CONTRACT NO. 5-34-2. This $2.5 million project is the installation of 24-inch and 36-inch vitrified clay pipe gravity sewer relief lines. Contract No. 5-34-2, Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 2, in the City of Newport Beach from Pacific Coast Highway to Marguerite in Bayside Drive. Change Order No. 2, in the amount of $28,803.00, adds six items of work and six calendar days to the contract. Items 1 through 5 totaling $12,329.00 are reimbursable to the District in accordance with an agreement previously executed with Mobil Oil Company (see discussion for Change Order No. 1 in Manager's Report for July 11, 1990 Board Meeting) . Item 1, in the amount of $346.00 and Item 2, in the amount of $1,069.00, is for the removal of asphaltic concrete to locate three manholes necessary for the boring under Pacific Coast Highway. Item 3, in the amount of $4,218.00, is for traffic control and raising a manhole to grade. Item 4, in the amount of $6,237.00, is for traffic control , removal of the bore pit shield, backfilling, paving and repair of a damaged water line. Item 5, in the amount of $459.00, is for additional potholing and surveying for verifying location of existing water and sewer lines, not as shown on the plans. Item 6, in the amount of $16,474.00, is for additional potholing and surveying required for locating utilities necessary for the relocation of the City's 24-inch and 18-inch water lines in the intersection of Jamboree Road and Bayside Drive. The above-described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items are for replaced work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2, for an addition of $28,803.00 and six calendar days to the Contract with Kenko, Inc. -12- August 8, 1990 DISTRICT 6 9(q): TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP OF SEWAGE FACILITIES AND EASEMENTS FROM DISTRICT NO. 6 TO COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT AND THE 32ND AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT. County Sanitation District No. 6 (CSD 6) operates sewage collection facilities serving the northerly half of the District which were constructed by the U.S. Army during World War II to serve the old Army Air Base (the site is now occupied by Orange Coast College, Costa Mesa High, the Orange County Fairgrounds and other commercial and residential development) . CSD 6 accepted ownership of the sewage facilities from the federal government in 1955. Over the years, many of the facilities have been abandoned as development has occurred. In 1960, the Sanitation District and the Costa Mesa Sanitary District (CMSD) entered into an agreement under which CMSD managed and maintained Air Base sewage facilities southerly of Baker Street. The agreement expired in 1975, however, for several years after that, CMSD continued maintenance. Over the past few years, Sanitation District's staff, together with General Counsel, have met with CMSD and the 32nd Agricultural District, operator of the Orange County Fairgrounds, to prepare an orderly plan for transfer of ownership and maintenance responsibilities for certain facilities that should be within each respective agency's jurisdiction. An agreement has been reached that provides for transfer of ownership of two south-to-north sewers (subject to future connections) to the 32nd Agricultural District and additional south-to-north lines to Costa Mesa Sanitary District between Baker Street and Arlington Drive. Exhibit 'A', attached to the proposed resolution included in the agenda supporting documents depicts the transfers. The agreement provides that the Sanitation District pay for any NNNW extraordinary maintenance charges for a period of five years. In the meantime, each agency has control over development and connections to their respective sewage facilities. Upon completion of the Sanitation District 6 master-planned sewer in Fairview Road extending southerly from Baker Street to Wilson Street, additional facilities would be turned over the the 32nd Agricultural District. The actions appearing on the agenda are to approve the agreement and authorize execution of said agreement by the Chairman and Secretary of the Board. The agreement has been approved as to form by General Counsel . Staff recommends approval . DISTRICTS 6. 7 AND 14 9(r) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE BAKER-GISLER INTERCEPTOR FROM BRISTOL STREET TO FAIRVIEW ROAD. CONTRACT NO. 14-1-1B This $5.5 million project is the installation of vitrified clay and reinforced concrete gravity sewer relief lines, Contract No. 14-1-1B, in the total amount of $5,345,523.30, is located within the City of Costa Mesa from Fairview Road to Bristol Street. Change Order No. 2, in the amount of $94,697.00, adds ten items of work to the contract. Item 1, in the amount of $6,564.00 is for construction delays caused by interference of existing telephone cable shown incorrectly. Item 2, in the amount of $719.00, pays for additional potholing required to verify the location -13- August 8, 1990 of existing telephone conduits shown incorrectly. Item 3, in the amount of $2,338.00, is for the remobilization of construction caused when an existing television cable was not relocated prior to the start of construction. Item 4, in the amount of $54.468.00, is for overexcavation of unstable sub-base material directed by the City of Costa Mesa. This item will be billed and paid by the City of Costa Mesa. Item 5, in the amount of $8,902.00, is for installation of a local 10-inch PVC sewer line around an Edison vault shown incorrectly. Item 6, in the amount of $549.00, is for the modification and connection of a sewer lateral to the 10-inch line which was enclosed in steel casing. Item 7, in the amount of $11,213.00, paid for protection and/or repair of utilities shown incorrectly or undisclosed. Item 8, in the amount of $1,280.00, pays for relocation of a local sewer lateral which interfered with the new 84-inch sewer. Item 9, in the amount of $1,455.00, is for the connection of a sewer lateral which was enclosed in steel casing and for the protection and repair of an undisclosed utility. Item 10. in the amount of $7,209.00, is for the protection and/or repair of several undisclosed utilities encountered during construction. The above-described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items are for replaced work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 adding $94,697.00 to the contract with Steve Bubalo Construction Company. There is no time extension associated with this change order. 9(s) : RECEIVE. FILE AND DENY CLAIM SUBMITTED BY KATHLEEN P. LANDERS RE CONTRACT NO. 14-1-1B. The Districts have received a claim from Kathleen P. Landers dated June 24, 1990, for damages to her vehicle allegedly caused in connection with the construction of Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road (and City of Costa Mesa Street Improvements), Contract No. 14-1-1B. The amount of the Claim is $650.50. The routine action appearing on the agenda is to receive, file and deny the claim and refer it to the Districts' General Counsel , liability claims administrator, contractor and contractor's insurance company for appropriate action. DISTRICT 7 9(t) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO ABANDONMENT OF LANE ROAD PUMP STATION. CONTRACT NO. 7-11-1 AND ABANDONMENT OF CASTLEROCK AND DOW AVENUE PUMP STATIONS AND MODIFICATIONS TO MACARTHUR PUMP STATION. CONTRACT NO. 7-11-3. Contract No. 7-11-1, Abandonment of Lane Road Pump Station, and Contract No. 7-11-3, Abandonment of Castlerock and Dow Avenue Pump Stations and Modifications to MacArthur Pump Station, in the total amount of $1.28 million, are located within unincorporated county territory and the cities of Orange, Tustin and Newport Beach. Change Order No. 2, in the amount of $24,319.00, adds four items of work and seven calendar days to the project. -14- August 8, 1990 Item 1, in the amount of $3,301.00, is for the removal of excess concrete at the base of manholes where new manholes were being constructed. Item 2, in the amount of $1,458.00, is for extra charges associated with the removal of undisclosed high cement content slurry around an existing 12-inch and 6-inch sewer lines. Item 3, in the amount of $5,749.00, is for relocation of the existing sewer lateral due to an elevation conflict. Item 4, in the amount of $13,811.00, the extra cost of connecting an undisclosed local sewer lateral . The above-described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items are for replaced work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 adding $24,319.00 and a time extension of seven calendar days to the contract with Colich and Sons (JV) . ALL DISTRICTS 11: ESTABLISHING 1990-91 CHARGES FOR CLASS I. II AND III INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMITTEES. Each year, following adoption of the annual budgets, the Directors establish industrial user rates for the fiscal year. Rates have been calculated in accordance with the Industrial Waste Ordinance adopted by the Boards. During the past several years, the Districts have been redistributing the cost ratios to more accurately reflect the higher costs for treating suspended solids (S.S.) and biochemical oxygen demand (B.O.D.) as a result of the secondary treatment process. This year the actual percentages are 18% to flow, 46% to S.S., and 36% to B.O.D. The actions appearing on the agenda are for each District to adopt a resolution fixing its respective industrial user rates for 1990-91 as shown on the agenda listing. 12: REPORT OF THE CONSERVATION. RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE. The Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee met on July 26, 1990. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on its discussions. 13: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BUILDING COMMITTEE. The Building Committee met on July 31, 1990. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on its deliberations and recommendations for consideration by the Boards. 14: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE. The Executive Committee met on July 25, 1990. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on its deliberations and recommendations for consideration by the Boards. -15- August 8, 1990 15: CEOA ACTIONS RE SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 TO PROGRAM EIR FOR 1989 COLLECTION. TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES MASTER PLAN. FOR INTERPLANT PIPELINE AND UTILITY CORRIDOR. JOB NO. I-9. �..i In 1989 the Directors approved the updated master plan which provided for facilities necessary to meet flow and regulatory discharge requirements for the next 30 years. Also approved was an Environmental Impact Report which addressed most of the master-planned projects. However, a few projects included within that document were only able to be addressed in a general manner and were designated as needing further review and additional CEQA documentation when the project was ready to begin the design phase. Job No. 1-9, Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, is one of those projects. In February the Directors approved a professional services agreement with John Carollo Engineers to provide environmental services, preliminary and final design and construction support services for the 1-9 project. The design calls for a new 120-inch diameter sewer line to transport treated wastewater within a 30-foot corridor along the westerly levee of the Santa Ana River from the Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant to the Ocean Outfall Booster Station at Treatment Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach. The new pipeline will be approximately 18,700 feet long and will replace an old 42-inch line which is over 60 years old and in poor condition. Other utilities are located in the interplant corridor and the Master Plan identified immediate and future interplant utility requirements including new pipelines for pure oxygen, industrial (reclaimed) water and sludge. Relocation and/or replacement of the existing interplant digester gas line and communications cables will also be required during construction of the new 120-inch line. The estimated cost of this project is $32 million. Located within the existing corridor are power poles which belong to Southern California Edison which will have to be relocated per our easement agreement of 1977. Staff, Edison and General Counsel are attempting to reach agreement on this issue. At Plant No. 2 there are several oil leases which have operating wells which interfere with the construction of the pipelines and they must be purchased, removed and abandoned. (See separate actions included in Agenda Item No. 14(b)(2) .) The Corps of Engineers in conjunction with the County of Orange have also scheduled Santa Ana River channel improvements which could conflict with the construction of this project and the possible impacts and scheduling constraints must be addressed. The 1989 Master Plan indicated that additional CEQA documentation would be required for this project and, accordingly, staff has initiated the process by circulating the Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment, as required. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment for the proposed project, finding that an Environmental Impact Report is required, and authorizing preparation of Draft Supplement No. 1 to the Program Environmental Impact Report for 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, and authorizing circulation for public review in compliance with CEQA requirements. -16- `/ 16: AGENDA FOR CLOSED SESSION. From time to time it is necessary for the Boards to convene in closed session to consider purchase and sale of real property, potential or pending litigation, personnel matters or other matters which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act. In order to avoid a situation where a closed session is needed but does not appear on the agenda, this standing item is placed on the agenda each month providing for a closed session at the regular meeting, if deemed necessary by the Boards. -17- RE; AGENDA ITEM #12 COUNTY SANITATION DISTOICIS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 108AA Ew5 DVENUE 00 Box ""' FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92725.2127 111a1 B62.2<n July 27, 1990 REPORT OF CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE Meeting Date: July 26 , 1990 - 5:30 p.m. COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Present: Hank Wades, Chairman J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager John C. Cox Thomas Dawes, Director of Engineering Richard B. Edgar Charles Nichols, Conservation, William D. Mahoney Reclamation and Reuse Manager Peer A. Swan Robert Ooten, Asst. Superintendent, Operations Edna Wilson Ed Hodges, Senior Facl. Mgr. , Maintenance Absent: Others Present: Carrey J. Nelson Clark Ide, Asst. General Counsel Iry Pickler Grace Winchell Staffing Update In December 1989 upon recommendation of this Committee, the Board approved additional staff for the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Division to help carry out the ambitious goals of the Districts' 30-year Action Plan adopted by the Directors last July. Charles Nichols, the division manager, reported on the status of staffing in his new division. In the division there are a total of four positions authorized, including manager, secretary, and two principal environmental specialists. The two principal environmental specialist positions remain open, Advertising and interviewing continues for filling these positions. Report of the Conservation, ... Reclamation and Reuse Committee July 26, 1990 , J Page 2 of 2 \/ Sludge Management Activities Staff presented information on the Districts' agricultural land application contract, new developing projects, regulatory issues, and the divisions' implementation plan. Many overheads were used to enhance the presentation, copies of which are enclosed. In reviewing the recommended approach for developing Central Valley agricultural land application projects, the Committee unanimously endorsed staff's recommended approach. The approach emphasized slow and careful demonstration of sludge land application effectiveness, eventually resulting in larger scale operations. A team of specialists will monitor sludge, soils, crops, and water during such projects. Future Committee Meetings The committee members set the next meeting for Thursday, September 27, 1990. CGN:gb Ref: 030132.RP ` I V V ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Name ct Pacer Seater Page Date I Subject L. A. Times 8 Z 7- /5 - 90 eauxr�y T1-er _92A � &Se/✓c �c0 County Takes Steps to Conserve Water The county's Environmental Man- agement Agency onFriday announced several new conservation methods that the agency hopes will dramatically reduce water consumption by county government Among other things, the agency wants to use reclaimed water, for the irrigation system at Laguna Niguel Regional Park. The county anticipates that it will save nearly 90% of the potable water now used there, according to Barbara Foster. a spokeswoman for Supervisor Harriett M.Wieder. Wieder s office.which has a record of calling for improved water manage- ment,announced the conservation mea- sures m a brief news release. The Orange County Water Conserva- tion Task Force. formed by Wieder, prompted the proposals. The EMA,the county's land-manage- ment agency, wants county parka offr- cia s to reduce their irrigation needs by at least 10%. Foster said that many parks already are watering less or watering in the evening and early morning when evap- oration is the least. To provide the public more examples of how to landscape with drought-resis- tant plants,the county has authorized a $5.000 grant from its Harbors. Beaches and Parks Divisions for a study in Rossmoor. The Rossmoor Community Services District, which has received a $31.000 state grant,has been working for more than a year on two mini-parks which Will demonstrate the use of drought-re- sistzntplants. Community serv.zes distnct presi- dent Germaine Erskine sia the play- grounds and picnic areas v0' serve as models for visitors to see 1•,w the park's designers can attractive.j >rsnge the plants. Ground-breaking ceremonies for the mini-parks are scheduled for Monday morning. —LAURA MICHAELIS Water-Use Efficiency Standards for Plumbing Fixtures: - Benefits of National Legislation Amy Vickers Pmpoeed US legbla6on mould establish nationwide water-use efficiency ahudards for rates of currently installed fixtures,and plumbing flatures,and appliances.The legislation I.Intended to reduce the need for and costa regional demographics. Additionally, of developing new sources of raw water by reducing demand. Potential benefits of the estimated water savings are based on legislatlon for both water and wastewater systeme are assessed. average water use of a 2.7-person house- hold,and outdoor water use is not con- Water providers across the United This article assesses the implications of sidered.Planners will be able to project States,from the water-poor West to the the proposed federal standards for both more accurate water savings as more water-rich East,are grappling with the water and wastewater systems. homes and nonresidential buildings are problem of meeting increased demand in ComanBttnai P11I.Mngf xtwu built or retrofitted with water-efficient the face of diminishing supplies. Many fixtures and a larger and more precise communities are finding that conserva- Conventional plumbing fixtures and data base is developed. tion is a cost-effective complement or appliances use relatively high amounts Toilets. A typical US household's alternative to developing new supplies of water to accomplish the sanitary conventional toilet using 3.5-7.0 gal/ that can be environmentally, emmm- purposes for which they were designed, flush uses 14-28 gpcd,or approximately ically,and politically infeasible. yet their relationship to overall water 24-38 percent of total indoor water use.1a In 1988 Massachusetts amended its consumption has been largely ignored In contrast, estimated pert pica water state plumbing code to require the use of by water supply planners and plumbing- use based on a 1.6-gal/flush toilet is 6 toilets that use only 1.6 gal/flush! equipment manufacturers. Only in the gpd. As shown in Table 2, replacing a replacing the previous (and nationally last 20 years have indoor plumbing fix- conventional toilet with a 1.6-gal/flush prevalent)standard of3.5gal/flush.Asa tures been designed with an eye toward unit would reduce a typical household's result of Massachusetts's initiative, efficient water use and flow. Fixtures per-capita water use by an estimated �..i other states,cities,and regional author. that meet the standards proposed in the 8-22 gpd, which translates into a total ities (e.g., Rhode Island, Connecticut, Atkins-Fowler bill,in fact,are commer. savings of 21.6-59.4 gpd per household New York,California,Washington,and cially available tram virtually every (7,900-21,700 gal/year), a savings of the Delaware River Basin Commission) manufacturer of plumbing equipment. 57-78 percent in this category of plumb- have enacted laws or plumbing codes Table l compares the proposed standards ing fixtures. requiring the use of 1.6-gal/flush toilets. with current performance standards, These projected savings are consistent Some have also required waterefficient which were largely established by the with findings from a University of showerheads, faucets, and urinals as plumbing quipment industry. Wisconsin at Madison pilot study' as well. Other states and localities are The United States is one of the few well as with the findings of a Phoenix, currentlymnsideringsimilarmeasures. remaining industrialized nations not Ariz.,field study.'In the Madison study, In response to the growing support for using water-efficient plumbing fixtures researchers found that daily indoor water such conservation measures,Rep.Ches. on a widespread basis.Japan,the Scan. use in homes retrofitted with toilets ter Atkins (D-Mass.) and Sen. Wyche danavian countries,and most of Europe using 0.5-1.4 gal/flush is as much as 75 Fowler(D-Ga.)last year introduced the and Central and South America have percent less than that in homes with National Plumbing Products Efficiency been using such fixtures(some of which conventional toilets. In the Phoenix Act in their respective chambers of the are supplied by US manufacturers)for study, 250 homes with 0.8-gal/flush US Congress(H.R.1185 and 5.583).The the past 20 years. toilets were found to use 19-28 percent legislation would set forth three broad PoteatlaI water savings less water per month than homes with federal provisions to establish: 3.5-gal/flush toilets. e national water-use efficiency stan. Water demand in a typical household These estimated savings are likely dards for plumbing fixtures and ap- can be significantly reduced with low- conservative because they assume an pliantm,includingtoilets,showerheads. volume toilets, showerheads, and fau- average of only four flushes per person kitchen and lavatory faucets, urinals, cets.For this article,1980 was chosen as per day;actual individual use could vary clotheswashers,and dishwashers; a breakpoint for comparing plumbing significantly, and there is much anec. e requirements for plumbing-fixture fixture water-use data because most dotal evidence indicating that it does. labeling information modeled after the states adopted codes requiring use of The assumption of four flushes per day federal "Energy Use Guide" label re- "water-saving" (but not low-volume) per person is based on a 1984 survey of quired for all electrical appliances and plumbing fixtures in 1980. Estimated household water use by the US Depart. for all fixtures to be marked to indicate water savings are based on average ment ofHousingand Urban Development water-use rates:and water-use rates for a range of fixture (HUD);'this assumption is low compared e a national water-use data base to sizes in both the pre-1980 and post-1980 monitor US water demand and need, categories. Actual savings may vary •Ahhaueh m,mows fedo%i—1..u.n.,w.re I. particularly as they relate to use of considerably depending on factors such WIn.1.L6 swnveh.„in,.„an L.rhn plumbing fixtures and appliances. as shower duration, flush rates, flow °a",I.,`,I.°p.tasai, I;�Vf.h.,h,.n..,.h.,h with that used by Preston' Anderson in this category would range from 15 to wide use by an estimated 3.4-8.4 bgd,a and Siegrist estimate that the average 48 percent. 3941 percent savings.This would ulti- US resident with a conventional toilet These household water-use rates and mately reduce daily indoor household uses about 9,000gal of water annually to projected savings for faucets are based per-capita consumption 77-56 gpd. flush 130 gal of body waste, numbers an anaveragedaily per-capita userateof Based on a current national average of that imply a higher flushing rate for 4.0 min/d.6 The rate could vary signif. 183 gpcd for all water use(residential both 3.5-and 5.5-gal/flush toilets!These icantly,depending on individual habits and nonresidential),full implementation estimates do not include water use asso- and fixture flow rates.Also,these aver. of thepropmedAtkins-Fowler standards ciated with toilet leakage,which is esti. age flow rates are based on rough sari- would reduce that consumption rate to mated to be as high as 20 percenh'Also, matesoftheamountofwaterthatcan be 162 Sped, a 12 percent drop. With a conventional toilets can sometimes be saved with watereHicient faucets and population of 250 million using 183 gpcd retrofitted with bottles,dams,or other aerstors.t The potential savings from for a total US water-use rate of 45.8 bgd, devices to reduce the total amount of replacing or retrofitting faucets are par. this potential savings of 3.4-8.4 bgd water used,but the hydraulic design of titularly difficult to determine because represents substantial additional water conventional toilets prevents them from most homes have several faucets and supplies. operating reliably at a 1.6gal/flush rate. because most domestic retrofit programs Full implementation of the Atkins- Showerbeads.The maximum flow rate developed to date have only been able to Fowler plumbing standards would take of the common showerhead in US homes provide one or two aerators if they are approximately 20 to 30 years based on averages 3.0-8.0 gpm and uses about suppliedatall Thelow measured savings the current bill's implementation sched- 12.5gpcd;•showers acmuntforabout22 of 0.5-0.75 gpcd that is typically achieved ule and on an annual fixture-replacement percent of total indoor water uses In by faucet retrofit programs may be due rate of 3-5 percent.kf Based on a US contrast, a 25gpm showerhead uses to averaging the higher flow rates of Census Bureau population projection of only about 8.2 gpcd. nonretrofitted faucets with those of the 294.4 million by 2020,8 the estimated As shown in Table 3, replacing a retrofitted faucets. average daily US water demand just conventional showerhead with a 2.5- Total homeheld savings. The total from water-efficient fixtures would be gpm fixture would result in an annual estimated annual household water sav- 6.2 bgd, a savings of 4.0-9.8 bgd over household water savings of 4.3 gpcd in ings from retrofitting conventional toi- that based on today's conventional fix. the use of post•1980 fixtures (3.0-5.0 lets,showerheads,and faucets with low- tures. These savings would effectively Spin)and 8.1 gpcd in the case of pre1980 flow fixtures range from 13.5 gpcd(for reduce the average percapita water fixtures(5.0-8.0gpm).These figures are replacing post-1980 fixtures)to 33.5 gpcd demand(barring other increases)in 2020 based on the following combined average for replacing pre-1980 fixtures(Table 5). to a level equivalent to that of a pro-1990 percapita flow rates for showerheads: It is important to note that estimated population. Without the proposed stan. 16.3 gpm for pre1980 fixtures,12.5 gpm savings for pre-1980 toilets are a com- dards,the nation's waterdemand an be for posb1980 fixtures, and 8.2 god for bined average of both the 5.5and 7.0- expected to rise to 53.9 bgd by 2020. the 2.5.gpm unit.HUD's estimated mea. gal/flush fixtures,and savings estimates (This figure does not take into account sured flow rate(the actual average flow for showerheads and faucets are com- any increase in the current rate at which rate as opposed to a fixture's maximum hind averages for multiple fixtures in demand is rising; that rate has been flow capacity) was used to calculate pre-and post-1980 categories.Also,these going up since 1960).4 savings in respect to pre1980 shower. figures are based on average measured These projected savings are also con. heads. Although this is lower than the flow rates. servative in that they exclude potential estimated average flow rate for pre-1980 For a typical 2.7-person household savings from toilets,showerheads, and showerheads, many retrofit programs these estimated savings range from 36.4 faucets used in nondomesticsectors such have shown that 3.4 gpm may be a more to 90.4 gpd (13,300-33,000 gal/year). as offices, commercial establishments, accurate rate than 5.0-8.0 Spun. Using water-efficient fixtures would and public and private institutions. The average measured flow rates are result in a new estimated households studies than maximumcapacitytlow rates water budget of 21.0 good,or 56.7 god because people typically run showers at per household(20,700 gaVyear)-a sav- A numberofUS waterand wastewater about two-thirds maximum capacity.1 ings of 39-61 percent over the current utilities as well as commercial estab. Fora typical 2.7-person household,water estimated household water budget(with lishments have initiated systemwide savings from switching to a 2.5-gpm conventional fixtures)of 34,000-53,700 plumbing-fixture replacement programs fixture would range from 11.7 to 22.0 gal/year. to reduce water demand, wastewater gpd(4,270-8,030 gal/year),a savings of Establishing the proposed national flows,or both.The followingcase studies 34-50 percent in this category. water-use standards could be expected exemplify the potential water savings Final Averagemnventional kitchen to decrease current household water and other benefits from such retrofit and lavatory faucets have a maximum demand from toilets,showerheads,and efforts.Additional case studies and more flow capacity of 3.0-7.0 gpm and use faucets by an average of 68,42,and 32 sophisticated analytical and statistical 8.0-13.2 gpcd, or about IS percent of percent,respectively. techniques are needed to ensure more - total indoor water use.° By replacing accurate projections of both water and conventional kitchen and lavatory fau- Nationwide wateranvfnga peNtttlel cost savings. sets wfthwaterconservingfixtures with Thepotential savings from installation Santa Mania, Calif. To help conserve maximum flow rates of 2.5 and 20 gpm, of water-efficient plumbing fixtures supplies and reduce loads on the Hy. respectively, a typical household an represent substantial additional water person wastewater treatment plant,the reduce water demand by 1.2-6.G gpcd supplies that an be used to help meet city of Santa Monica,Calif.,has initiated (Table 4).These figures are based on the increased demand or cover existing a program to replace 12,000 conventional following combined average measured shortfalls.Assuming a 1990 US popula- flow rates for faucets: 1.7 gpm for 2.5- tion of 250 million, current US daily •rnmis ankle it We.seasonal test a.m.n ahuwenng gpm fixtures, 2.0 gpm for 3.0-gpm fix. water consumption by toilets, shower. time her know was ae mwd. tures, and 3.3 Spain for 3.0- 7.0-gpm heads, and faucets is estimated to be tr rthi.mmeit was Potential that f.u.aa loomss moo kintake am 3....M fauns emus then wen so neahk fixtures.For a typical 2.7-person house 8.6-13.6 bgd. Total replacement of eon- orconfirmisi estimates of the.ew.n<numhanefea.h into, hold, these savings amount to 3.2-17.2 ventional fixtures with water-conserving of Imee`,w.'a...ntc.biro sv„`he<.m baso is.... gpd(1,170-6,280gaVyear).Water savings fixtures would reduce current nation- list..u..2.75 am. TABLE 1 toilets with low-flow fixtures;anticipated ns Cmsnnt.ad Prnpnad maser tow by PI.mb/nalatmis savings are old toil00D gpd-Thedryct so ro use the old toilets m he city an Ptapued warim® artificialoffshorereeftoincreasehabitat Elatan Overeat Watt U.e• water,u.et for marine life. Toilet 15-]Aad/xueh L6gsV0uth Lenex gold la Bcetrl•t✓Im The histoC shoo>htad 3 ogpw 25am Lenox Hotel in Boston, Mass., has rt.� KhcAm f..cn tam 2.76-7.0,,m uaaw duced itsavmagewaterdenand byabout rtnmament amtors) 40 (3.6 mil Utt.mry faun lam x]S].0apm 10,m Pint gaVYearwa[ersavings tapiaamnt ammts) and $15,000/year cost savings) by re- unnal 15S Sehi,vh 1.0 gspnush placing conventional fixtures in its 220 •aastdm data from the HumanantanWaau..n imitate and the Con.umns Union minswith l.6-gaVflmhorflushometer- teaad on ptopmM Nation.]Plumting Product.Efficiency Ace of IM type toilets,2,5-gpm showerheads,and 2.5gpm faucet aerators.These savings TABLE 2 have been achieved with no reduction in Potential r.atosovings with 1.6-gaf//fash What nPlaomenr fixture performance or customer satis- warerU.e wamsavinga faction and with no problems with Tal.[ ff�A 2T•P. wastewater flows - w.terUae Parc pat Per 6pio xomehoid Lhuet Taxes. Thirty-three housing twt/Ifaah Od qsd apd units of a pre-1970senior citizen housing P,000erd project were replaced in November 1989. IS 6 The new units were fitted with 1.fr Post-im gal/flush toilets. Water savings in the 35 a960 first month was 16,000 gal, m about 55.61 a is 15-20 gped, and there have been no 7.0 29 22 59.4 complaints to date.10 •Aaume fm,rnmhna mrpe,nasan:doe na indvde vnvruse through leatmse Performance of for-vd®a TABLE 3 plumbing fixtures PoknfiafmNmuingr with 2.5-t9rn shamerhmd npfaawenP More than 1 million low-volume shoari.em weer U. water savings plumbing fixtures have been installed in watQ U. zy-Pe,.m zy.Persaa the United States without any difficulties MFCt(MFgt) Par Capita xaa.ehoW Per Capin xoaaahad being reported outside of normal prob- aPaa Aid tU+ Lit aPd lems that occur with any plumbing fix- Propoem tune.The performance of low-flow toilets ]50.]I a2 711 has been discussed elsewhere;-" brief 301 reviews of the performance of the di 3.U-5.026) V_5 33B a3 ll.] Pret980 feren[fixtures follow. s.a-e.o fe.ay isa 4.o eat zzo TaBaR Taday's 1.6gaVflush toilets •Assume a 49 mod shone,Mp nnim.Anud savings with fxtute replacmmts may he highs or are the result of more than a decade of hitter than shorm banused averaging of ovate,.wera.:germesch srowe,hm. design innovations by the plumbing- thtadm at iinuta ninety equipment industry. Many new toilets tMenurd firtuaamriry•twothias MFC meet or exceed current performance §FIIID eanmate far a romm�aening s mw.r standards for the conventional water-saving V TABLE 4 flush toilets marketed as waters-flow Potsnttaf mafnsapingr with 2.5-t9.nlamrzt rzPlarement• fixtures. The performance of low-flow Finrat Was.ruse Water savings toilets in laboratory and field application Water Ur 27 Pena° 27 Person has been well tl cumented."au These MPCt(htFxt) Pardpin xnu.ehad Per Capita xm.ebae studies have consistently shown that ePa, ad god yd SO the improved and innovative features of Prim low-flow toilets allow them to perform Is(1.]) 6a to as well as or better than 3.5gal/flush Pmn1980 units. A growing number of installs- 3020) 60 21.6 12 22 tions of 1.6gal/flush toilets continues to Protect hear this out. 10-].0133) 132 35.6 fit 17.2 SYorRhoda •Assume,a 4.0 miwd tunning faucet WpenActualtt.Actualsa l vior.wm fi iztum replaamenu may be llle3.0gpmshowerhead hfghe,or hat-than shoanbmua d averaging of wwcate.arwe for och fime, is the national standard, although tblavmum fan.spooq higher-Flow fixtures are easily obtain- tMmmmf tut opaory.tan wW.WC able A number of retrofit programs have used showerlinds with flow rates TABLES of 25 gpm and lower without perfor. Potntiaf water sadrrgs with].6gmV/fxsh toi4f.2.S ern ..tread, mancecomplaints.Such programs have and2.5-gimfamntrralmomnr been conducted in Phoenix, Ariz.: San water U. water savings Jose.Calif.:Seattle,wash.;Irvine Ranch, 2.7-Person z7-Peram Calif.:Tampa.Fla.;Austin,Texas:and ".rams. Par capee eamahae Par Cap re, x.1taid the Boston.Mass.,metropolitan area. Water u.e spit Slid god aid Faucet aaralna. Many retrofit pro P Pmo 21 s67 grams have also used faucet aerators Pot.lm ads s32 ms 36d help reduce water consumption. T.\� Pra1960 5d5 1412 335 90.4 previously mentioned Lenox Hotel pro- gram successfully installed 1.5-gpm aerators,which use leas water than the have included adopting a program to Rdereuees Atkins-Fowler bill proposed standard retrofit 81.000 single-family homes with 1. Residential Water Conservation Proj- (2.0 gpm for lavatory faucets and 25 water meters and advocating the use of etc-A Summary Report. Prepared by gpm for kitchen faucets). 1.6-gal/Bush toilets in all new construe,- Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engi Urinal, A fiushometer-valve urinal tion.In addition,Fresno plans to retrofit neers for the US Department of Housing that uses only I gal/flush has been 125,000 single,family and multifamily and Urban Development(lure 1994). commercially available and in use for homes with water-effiaentshowerheacis 2. Home Water Conservation GuideMassa- severalyears.Most new installations of and toiletdams. chusetts Water Resources Authority. such fixtures use valves set foreithar 1.0 Septic system, Reduced wastewater Boston.Mass.(1989). 3. Smow tro sr,R.L;Bovta.W.C.;&AeRsoN. or LS gal/flush. volumes associated with conservation D.L A Field Evaluation of Selected Water Avoided costs and odw benefits can extend the life of an overloaded Conservation and Wastewater Reduction septic system,therebydelayingoravoid- Systems for Residential Applications. Savings from waterconsesvingplumb- ing expansion of existing drain fields Tech. Rep[. WIS WRC 81-02, Univ. of ingfixturescan acrntenot only to water and allowing new systems to be smaller. Wisconsin Water Rnources Center. users in the form of reduced water and Natfcamhuetlw ad"Wells.Reduced Madison,Wis.(1981). sewer bills but towaterand wastewater water demand associated with conser. 4. ANDERSON, D.L & SarGRBT, R.L. The systems as a whole.Potential benefitsof vationcancontributetolowerconstruc. Toilets Phof UltrsluA-WWA.8F3ush the water conservation measures pro- tion costs in that reduced water and (Mar. in Phaaix.four.AR'WA,81352 posed in the Atkins-Fowler bill include wastewater loads would allow down- (Mar.1989). Po 5. ClwwtPRESr N, B.L High Efficiency Water the And pes n avoided system expansion sizing of Watable grnd sewerConservation lines. gone 1984). sis.l'(umeingfegr.,15:520 and operating costs. improved water Sustainable b gnsura Conservation of gone alca quality,reduced load on septic systems, water can be insurance for acomma- 6. Persona and Caldwell Consulting dam. reduced new-facility construction costs, nity's future prosperity and growth in Brawn and Caldwell Consulting Engi- enhanced capacity to sustain growth that conservation can help balance sup- news Gan. 1990). and development. improved consumer 7. Personal communication. R Church. p Ply with demand. Every new home or eduw[ion,and development ofanational building equipped with water-saving Plumbing Mfrs.of thehis Uune1989)- wa[er-use data base. plumbing fixtures can potentially pro- 8. United Projections of y A Population o[ the Avoided sywh n ads. Reduced water vide additional water supply and waste, United Stara U Age Sex,and Racee. PP Y Census to Bureau. . Dept.Series Commerce. demand results In reduced need for new wafer capacity for future development Census Bureau. Publ. Series P25, No. supplies and the capital investments without overburdeningexistingsystoms. lot&Washington.D.C.Um 1999). and operatingoosts associated with them Public s lueatiom The Atkins-Fowler 9. Personal communication from Gary L and expanded wastewater facilities. bill includes a component requiring Saunders.Lenox Hotel Dune 1989). Reduced demand also reduces waste, consumer education through marking 10. Personal communication. Mike Person. watervolumealongwithcosm associated and labelingof water-userates and costs nett, Lower Colorado River Authority with collection and treatment.Another of plumbing fixtures and appliances. Use.1990). potential benefit is the reduction in wear Wateruss dab bus. The bill would 11. Vlcros, A. New Massachusetts Toilet and tear on existingfacilities as a result also establish a data base to track the Standard Sets W A.81 :48(Mar. Precc dent/our. . WWA,819:4R(Mar. .Ves). of reduced flows of water and waste, nation's water demands and needs, 12. KoneN,T.P.&DeYouNc,R.An Invati- �' water. Finally, reduced demand asso- particularly as they relate to the use of gation of the Performance and Effects of dated with waterrconserving plumbing plumbing fixtures and appliances.This Reduced-Volume Water Closers on Sari. fixtures could result in less frequent and information could be useful to water is" Drainage. Sewers. and Sewage smaller system expansions, with the supply Professionals who must deter- Treatment Plants.Cont.on Water Can- associated cost savings being applied to mine future water demand and estimate servation and Sewage,Flow Reduction help stabilize utility costs and upgrade the cost-benefit relationship of water With Water-Saving Devices. Pennsyl- vania State Dow. University Park. Pa. existing facilities. conservation programs. (Apr. 1975). Water quality. Water conservation is Conclusion 13. Ga vnn.I.J.A Model for the Transport linked to the preservation of water qual- Mechanisms of Solids in Building Pipe ity. particularly that of groundwater The potential savings tram the pm Drains.US Dept.of Commerce Cant.an supplies drawn from aquifers through posed National Plumbing Products Effi- Publicly Supplied Potable Water. NBS wells.By decreasing groundwater with- ciency Act could allow the United States Pub..624.Washington.D.C.Uune 1982). draws]rates through conservation meth- to significantly reduce its overall water 14. Personal communication. David Todd. ods, the rate at which contaminants demand and related costs. Moreover, City of Fresno.Calif.(Jan.19901 such as seawater, septic leachate, and such savings would be permanent and. hazardous wastes are drawn into an in some cases,may represent additional About the author. aquifer can be reduced. Slowing this supplies not achievable by any other Amy Vickenisapraj- infiltration rate could affect the usability method.Utilities could begin to reverse ectmanagerspecializ. and longevity of a groundwater supply trends toward increased water demand ingin waterresources serving Public drinking water needs. and shortages and start to measure management and wa. Heavy groundwater pumping and the gains in available supplies. ter conservation with use of agricultural chemicals have Someenvironmentalproblemsrequire _ Brown and Caldwell created a watercrisis in Fresno,Calif..a complex technological changes and in- Consultants. 100 r,mmunity of 360,000 people it t�oup- novative solutions.but water conserva- Boylston St.. Suite ter of California's San Joaquin Valley. tion through low-Bow plumbingfixtures 702. Boston, MA 02116. Agraduate of Overpumping by Fresno is pulling con- is relatively easy and inexpensive to Dartmouth College with a masters degree ruminants toward citywellfields.forcing accomplish. Alan. establishing uniform in engineeringsciences,she sea memberof the city to shut down 35 wells contain- national water-use efficiency standards AWWA. NEIVWA, WPCE and ANSI inated by i ibromochloropropane, an for fixtures and appliances would be a Committee A112. Vickerswrolethe Al". agriculturalchemical.]'Fresnois trying major first step toward the creation of a sachuselts plumbing code requiring low. to reduce water demand to slow migra- national conservation policy plus the flow toilets and is the principal author of tion of contaminants toward the city's institutional framework necessary to thepmposedNationalPlumbingProducts other wells.Responses bythecitycouncil ensure adequate future supplies. Efficiency Act. Inside WastejTm Vol. 1, No. 4 July 1990 NEWS BRIEFS GOVERNOR'SAPPOINTM ENT TO NEW BOARD OPPOSED BY ENVIRONMENTAL GROUPS Governor Deukmejian has appointed John E.Gallagher and refuses confirmation, or fails to act within 90 days, the Sam A. Egigian to the new California Integrated Waste Governor then has 20 days to submit another appoint- Management Board. Environmental groups, including the ment.TheSenate then ties another 90 days to confirm or Sierra Club, the Planning and Conservation League, and refuse to confirm that appointment. If the Senate has Citizens Against Waste immediately cried foul about the failed to act on a subsequent appointment by January 1, appointment of Gallagher to fill the'environmental* position 1991, that appointment is deemed confirmed. on the new Board. Corey Brawn, General Counsel of the Planning and Conservation League, characterized the ap- The Senate Rules Committee has scheduled a hearing pointment of Gallagher to fill the environmentalist position on on Gallagher's appointment for August 15th. the Board as'a complete breach of faith of the commitment in the law to appoint an environmentalist tothe Board.'Brown further indicated that'the Governor has put us in the position that we have no choice but to oppose this nomination.- Representatives of the Sierra Club and Californians Against _ Waste also indicated that they would oppose Senate confir- mation of the appointment of Gallagher to the environmental position on the Board. Gallagher has served as a member of the 'old' California Waste Management Boardfrom 1985 to 1990.He has served as board chairman since 1988 until he just recently resigned from the rid Board to accept the appointment to the new Board. Gallagher also served as Executive Director of the Industry Environmental Council,a nonprofit coalition of con- tainer manufacturers,from 1970 to 1982.According to a Los Angeles Times story, it was his service to this group,which was involved in recycling efforts,that Gallagher says qualifies him for the environmental position on the new Board.Environ- mental groups, however, contend that the Industry Environ- mental Council is and always has been a coalition of industry interests opposed to the bottle bill and other environmental measures. Egigian was appointed to the position on the new Board for a person with private sector experience in the solid waste industry.He is the vice president of L A.Bedliners,a position that he has held since 1988. From 1978 to 1988, he was president and owner of Interstate Solid Waste Equipment Company. He has also served as president of the California Refuse Removal Council. Both of these appointments require Senate confirmation. Underthe provisions of AB 939,the Senate has 90 days to act upon confirmation on these appointments. If the Senate July 23, 1990 STAFFING UPDATE FOR NEW CONSERVATION. RECLAMATION AND REUSE DIVISION In mid-December of 1989, the Districts' Board of Directors approved a staffing plan for the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse (CRR) Division which authorized the addition of two professional staff members to focus on water reclamation and conservation issues. Immediately after that authorization, working with the Personnel Division, we posted the notice for the two positions and advertised in local newspapers. At the same time realizing that our needs would be narrowly focused, advertisements were placed in the American Water Works Association Journal and the California Department of Water Resources - Water Conservation News. As it turns out, our best response from interested persons has been from these two specialty advertisements. As a result of this recruitment process, we screened the candidate pool and interviewed a total of 11 prospective employees. In May we filled the conservation position by hiring Michelle Merritt, most recently a teacher at Irvine Valley College. Unfortunately for the Sanitation Districts Michelle was offered a ..+ full-time teaching position at the college beginning in the fall which she accepted. Therefore, at this time both staff positions in the Division remain unfilled. Among other candidates interviewed, there remain two qualified for the positions. Between the preparation of this staff report to the Director's and the July 26 Committee meeting, staff will conduct a second round of interviews with the candidates. 2 July 23, 1990 CURRENT SLUDGE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES A. CURRENT STATUS The Districts are presently disposing of residual solids (dewatered sludge) by combining them with municipal refuse in a landfill in Los Angeles County or by recycling portions of the sludge. Our current production is about 35 loads per day. Each load is approximately 20 tons. About 50% of the sludge solids are disposed of at the landfill and 50% processed and recycled as a compost material or directly applied to agricultural land for beneficial reuse. Because of the difficulty of disposing of sludge and the tenuous nature of disposal alternatives, the Boards have adopted a policy of practicing multiple disposal options. Accordingly, the Districts have entered into contracts with four separate firms for sludge disposal and/or reuse under varying terms. In 1988 the Boards entered into a three-year agreement with Pima Gro Systems, Inc. (Pima Gro) to remove and reuse residual solids for beneficial agricultural use. This agreement was executed and included a cost of $33.50 per ton and a guaranteed minimum quantity of sludge equal to five load per day. Over the past two years, Pima Gro has performed its work consistent with the `✓ contract terms and conditions. Among many contract provisions there exists the opportunity to adjust the amount of sludge provided to Pima Gro from the Sanitation Districts, to adjust the cost of sludge management, up or down, based upon the consumer price index for the greater Los Angeles/Orange County area for the previous year, or the economics of scale related to the quantities of residual solids managed. Pima Gro has requested of the Sanitation Districts a change in these contract terms. They desire to increase the quantities of residual solids handled within this contract and to adjust the compensation correspondingly. Staff is negotiating with Pima Gro on these terms. If such negotiations are successful, staff would return to the Committee and the Boards of Directors with suggested changes to the Pima Gro contract provisions. B. NEW COOPERATIVE VENTURES 1. Coyote Canyon Landfill Closures. In March of this year the Orange County Intenrated Waste Management Department, which operates Orange County landfills, opened the new Bee Canyon landfill and significantly reduced the flow of solid 3 July 23, 1990 waste to Coyote Canyon landfill. At that time the IWMD began the closure process for the landfill. The sanitation Districts have proposed to the IWMD to use the Districts' sludge as a portion of the final landfill cover. The final cover will be approximately 6 feet thick with a top soil layer of 2.5 feet for growing plants. The Districts' sludge would be an excellent material to blend with other soil planned for this top layer. Sludge would add nutrients, would increase the organic humus content of the soil, and would improve the water-holding capacity of the soil. Much research of this type of project has occurred, and this research has shown that sludge blended with locally-available sandy soil will improve the survival and health of plants installed by the IWMD. The IWMD expects to finalize its landfill closure plan this summer and begin the closure process later this year. The closure activities should last about 18 months. 2. New Cooperative Ventures. As a part of pursuing sludge management options for Hoard consideration, the CRR division staff has been proceeding on three new cooperative ventures in sludge reuse. Two are local, while one is in the central California valley. The central valley project would be an agricultural land application project similar to the Districts' current projects in the Palo Verde valley area of eastern California and the Yuma area in Arizona. Staff has visited several prospective farmers in the central valley and have earned favorable receptions. We have been asked by these farmers to propose demonstration projects. Staff is formulating project plans and proposals that would be forwarded to the farmers. The two local projects are co-composting proposals, one with the IWMD of the county and one with Village Nurseries. Composting is the biological decomposition of organic matter at an elevated temperature. Co-composting is a term applied to the blend of sludge and yard waste material such as tree prunings, leaves, grasses, etc. When these materials are combined and composted one has maximized the reuse opportunity. At the county each year they receive several hundred thousand tons of yard waste that could be composted with the Districts' sludge. Staff is working with the IWMD's recycling manager to aevelop a project to bring these two materials together. 4 July 23, 1990 On a much smaller scale the local nursery generates several thousand tons of yard waste annually that could also be blended with sludge to make compost. Several advantages accrue from such a project including 1) reduction of yard waste going to the landfill that saves landfill space and dollars, 2) recycling of yard waste and sludge on the nursery property that also reduces uses of petroleum products that lessens energy use, improves air quality, and saves dollars. Staff is working with the nursery management to develop a project to bring these two materials together. C. Regulatory Liaison. A significant portion of staff time recently has focused on managing state legislation that affects the Districts' sludge management. At the state level a new law, AB 1820, would amend last year's Integrated Solid Waste Management Act (AB 939) . Before our involvement, including testimony before a state Senate hearing of the Natural Resources and Wildlife Committee, the measure did not allow cities and counties to get recycling credit for any sludges that recycled. Clearly, this approach is not a recycling incentive. During April and May staff, in concert with CASA and other agencies, successfully modified the bill to eliminate the sludge recycling credits exclusion after 1991. In the intervening period state agencies with the assistance of CASA and Tri-Tac members, including the Sanitation Districts, will review the safety of sludge management and make any recommendations for changes that may be appropriate. At the federal level the Bureau of Land Management in the Department of the Interior has issued a policy statement banning municipal sewage sludge application to any lands under their jurisdiction. obviously, this policy is extremely negative, and the POTW community including the Sanitation Districts is actively attempting to have BLM change this policy. EPA continues to develop a final proposal for sludge management regulations. The agency will issue results of a nationwide survey of sludge quality later this year followed by issuance of the regulations in October 1991. D. SLUDGE MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Staff is evaluating the needs for sludge management implementation and developing an approach for the Directors' consideration. An overview of the sludge management implementation plan will be discussed at the Committee meeting. 5 DISCUSSION OUTLINE CONSERVATION. RECLAMATION & REFUSE COMMITTEE July 26, 1990 I. Opening Discussion Attachments INFORMATION A. Chairman's Report .. " B. Conservation News Clippings Orange C. Reuse News Clippings Green II. Staffing Update for New Conservation, Goldenrod INFORMATION Reclamation and Reuse Division III. Current Sludge Management Activities Beige A. Status Update INFORMATION 1. Sludge Production and Distribution a. Recyc Composting Contract Extension (Boards approved in July) b. Curti Composting (Boards approved in July) C. Pima Gro Agricultural Land Application d. BKK Landfilling B. New Cooperative Ventures 'FORMATION 1. Coyote Canyon Landfill Closure and Sludge Soil Amendment 2 . Central Valley Agricultural Land Application 3 . Co-Composting With Orange County IWMD 4 . Co-Composting With Village Nurseries C. Regulatory Liaison INFORMATION 1. SI.M Sludge Land Ban Policy " 2 . EPA Sludge Regulations " 3 . State and Local Integrated Waste Management Planning D. Sludge Management Implementation Plan IV. other Business V. Next Meeting: September 27, 1990. ref. 030124 . 1tr 1 SUMMARY OF PIMA GRO CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS PROCESS - Digested, dewatered sludge transported, applied and plowed into soil to fertilize agricultural crops, primarily cotton. COST - $33.50 per wet ton. QUANTITY - Average 5 truckloads per day, 5 days per week. LOCATION - Blythe, CA, and Yuma, AM PERMITS - Provided by Colorado River Regional Water Quality Control Board and Arizona Department o Environmental Quality. 030129 .OVR 7/27/90 SUMMARY OF PIMA GRO CONTRACT PERFORMANCE July 1988 to 33,108 wet tons $1 ,109,118 June 1989 July 1989 to 34,173 wet tons $1 ,144,795 June1990 Totals 67,281 wet tons $2,2539913 Projected 35,000 wet tons $19172,500 July 1990 to June 1991 030129.OVR 7/27/90 SUMMARY OF COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL CLOSURE AND SLUDGE SOIL AMENDMENT PROJECT • Project Duration 18 months • Quantity of Sludge 156,000 wet tons or that could be used approximately 50% of in the Project the Districts' sludge (the portion presently being co-mixed with solid waste) • Site Size 300 acres 030129.OVR 7/27/90 �� SUMMARY OF CENTRAL VALLEY AGRICULTURAL LAND APPLICATION PROJECT • Project Location Approximately 250 miles one-way; similar to Blythe project • Estimated Cost $25 to $30 per wet ton • Quantity of Sludge Initially only a few truck loads per week; after proven success, potentially large quantities 030129 .OVR 7/27/90 • Proposal Approach Go Slow! Commitment to high-quality, safe, professional, sensitive, and reliable project With only a few truckloads of sludge demonstrate, the - effectiveness of sludge; .. monitor sludge, soils, crops, and water After successful demonstrations, move into larger scale with farmers that want sludge. May require 3 to 5 years to achieve full-scale operation 030129 .OVR 7/27/90 SUMMARY OF CENTRAL VALLEY AGRICULTURAL LAND APPLICATION PROJECT Major Tasks: 1 . Draft proposals, obtain Committee guidance on proposals, and negotiate with farmers. 2. Agree on locations, crops, application rates, monitoring, reporting, sludge fees, and long-term schedule. " 3. Coordinate with local regulators, elected officials, farmers, citizens, and university researchers. 4. Prepare recommended detailed project design, financial analysis, and schedule of activities. 5. Committee consideration of recommended project design. 6. Implement demonstration project. 030129 .OVR 7/27/90 WHAT IS COMPOSTING? The biological decomposition of organic matter, controlling environmental conditions, such as odor, temperature, time in a pile, and end product quality and safety. WHAT IS CO-COMPOSTING? Composting by blending two materials with different characteristics such as sludge blended with "green" wastes (leaves, grass, and wood chips). 030129.OVR 7/27/90 SUMMARY OF `- CO-COMPOSTING PROJECTS • Project Approach Go Slow! Commitment to high-quality, safe, professional, sensitive, and reliable project. Using only a few truckloads of sludge, demonstrate the effectiveness of co- composting; monitor compost performance, sludge, odor, operations, economics, end product, and plant growth trials. After successful demonstrations, move to larger scale operations. May require 3 to 5 years to achieve full-scale operation. 030129.OVR - 7/27/90 SUMMARY OF CO-COMPOSTING PROJECTS •- • Project Location Orange County • Sponsors Jointly with Orange County Integrated Waste Management Department (IWMD) and private companies such as Village Nurseries • Estimated Cost $20 to $30 per wet ton • Quantity of Sludge Initially only a few truck loads per week; after proven success, the potential to use 1 /4 to 1/3 of the total Districts, sludge • (quantity of "Green" Waste Orange County as much as 1 ,000,000 tons per year Village Nursery, a medium-sized operation, generates 100 tons per week (5,000 tons per year) at a cost of $10,000 per month 030129 .OVR 7/27/90 SLUDGE REGULATIONS ADOPTION SCHEDULE August 7, 1989 End of public comment period for proposed numerical limits December 1989 Results from National Sewage Sludge Survey (NSSS) released. February 1990 Public comment period for NSSS ends. August 1990 Revised numerical limits proposed. October 1990 End of public comment period for revised proposed numerical limits. October 1991 Promulgation of final regulations. 030129.OVR 7/27/90 �7 SUMMARY OF ISSUES & OBSERVATIONS • Sludge's apparent lack of human health impact • Questionable phytotoxicity data • Lack of site-specific flexibility .. • Unreasonable exposure assumptions • First risk-based, cross-media proposed rule • Inconsistency within the proposal 030129 .OVR 7/27/90 • Separation of science and policy `.i • Use of 98th percentile concept unfair • Not accounting for differences in sludge quality due to domestic and industrial sources • Develop sludge land application rates based on practical, realistic use of nitrogen management U • Unclear status of regulation of dedicated sites • Incomplete and inconsistent proposal for distribution and marketing of sludge products 030129 .OVR 7/27/90 A = 939 r »� Assemblyman Bryon Sher CCCSD �� �'�t � 3uiefr ��y§5 y��?R�S tJ� QQ/1QQ i ��` , 1.�'^ fn zr �� a4•� 5��. �''. ..�`. � �..� z,` •"ar'�' .�HMikk�7ea�..s�,�^wi� .a.ua «u�;�at '. Current Method for Managing • • Waste 1990 00 TPD 1200 TPD !Tran+sfer sl rVil 0 •._• Station Station Source Landfill 100% of all Solid Waste • r5 K 1 1 y S 3 CCCSD �4 s �� 1 r � �v� x �577 � t [ •: E }�° 3���+s�,4 :1.�%,ak*:.�;..r.Sabs�u.�,i.txz�m�.�,�.•.f. .,c.s.,.m, � . .��:r�, �ua.:&wy' St-ateIntegrated Approach to Accomplish Mandated Goals 1995 11 TPD 911 TPD Station ITransfer x - > r•• Source Landfill 75% of all Solid Waste } ♦ Recycling, Source Reduction and Possible Composting r Markets for CCCSD NMIWFI:w^#a.�:.skT�rax�:Fw+A�K.�.�.....w�w4cw.i.'.4;'�in.n. Integrated Approach to Accomplish State Mandated Goals 2000 1200 TPD 600 Source AA Landfill _ Solid0% of all r Expanded' Programs Markets for Items CCCOOD Pour Major Parts 1 . Reorganizes California Waste Management Board 2. Creates new integrated waste management planning process 3. Strengthens certification and performance standards for Local Enforcement Agencies (LEA) 4. Establishes Funding 9 1 . Reorganizes California Waste Management Board • California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) • 6 full-time members • New Solid Waste Disposal Hierarchy: • Source Reduction • Recycling and Composting • Transformation (incineration) and landfill disposal • Strict conflict of interest provisions 41 i 5 �`A ,Pj'�v8i$a1SfA Nil, N _ 4yRtl �f A _ n'f f E3k i d 1 G !x ."aoS P1 2 . Creates new integrated waste management planning process • Increases emphasis on source reduction and recycling • County Task Force • County-wide Integrated Waste Management Plan (CoIWMP) • County-wide Siting Element • City Source Reduction and Recycling Elements • Summary of significant waste management problems facing the County • Statement of Task Force goals and objectives • Establishes hierarchy for managing solid waste (Integrated approach) AIN ..F Focal Agency Responsibilities in Implementing AB 939 • Develop City Source Reduction and Recycling Elements 1 . Waste Characterization Component 2. Source Reduction Component 3. Recycling Component 4. Composting Component 5. Solid Waste Facility Capacity Component 6. Education and Public Information Component 7. Funding Component 8. Special Waste Component 9. Household Hazardous Waste Component • Implement recycling and household hazardous waste programs to achieve the 25%/50% solid waste reduction goals • Prepare public education/information � a 3. Strengthens certification and performance standards for Local Enforcement Agencies (LEA) • Four types of LEA certification • landfills • incinerators • transfer and processing stations • litter, odor, and nuisance control at landfills • Certification Regulations • After August 1 , 1992, an LEA must be certified by the CIWMB F // •-�gjpc�d! F � 4 N F-iy� a �n � P �d1 4 E�e '�x. C 4. Establishes Funding Existing Funds • Continues the Solid Waste Disposal Site Cleanup and Maintenance Account in General Fund • Establishes permit enforcement programs • Provides grants to local agencies to initiate and implement Household Hazardous Waste programs to preserve remaining solid waste disposal capacity • Imposes Annual fee on landfill operators • $20,000.000 < Balance of Annual Fees < $100,000,000 New Funds • Additional Funding - Tipping Fee on landfill disposal ,(Integrated waste Management Account) January 1, 1990 - June 30, 1990 $.50 per ton July 1, 1990 - June 30, 1991 $35 per ton As of July 1, 1991 Not to exceed $1 per ton REUSE - SLUDGE MANAGEMENT •JULY 1989 BOARD POLICIES o Continue to promote multiple, beneficial reuse alternatives for sludge management o Strive for 100% sludge recycling o Maintain at least one in-county land management option as a backup • MARCH 1988 BOARD POLICIES o Implement multiple solids residuals management options, under suitable separate and various contracts, to maximize interim and long-term residuals recycling while maintaining reliability o Plan cooperative sludge management programs as a lead agency or member of a joint powers or other suitable arrangement o Pursue and evaluate sludge management options for Board consideration SLUDGE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ACTIVITIES FOUR MAJOR PHASES: 1 . Ongoing Practices 2. Developing Cooperative Ventures e.� 3. Regulatory Liaison 4. Emerging Alternatives & Technology 030129.OVR 7/27/90 SLUDGE MANAGEMENT ONGOING PRACTICES ,.. 1 . Continue Private Contracts 2. New Options & Technology 3. Sludge Quality & Quantity Management 4. On-Site Process Performance Compliance 5. In-Plant Reuse 030129.OVR 7/27/90 �J SLUDGE MANAGEMENT -� DEVELOPING COOPERATIVE VENTURES 1 . Coyote Canyon Landfill Closure and Sludge Soil Amendment 2. Co-Composting 3. Central Valley Agricultural Land Application 4. Site Acquisition 5. Regional Sludge Management Planning & Coordination 6. Indusby Assistance & Clearinghouse u 030129.OVR 7/27/90 SLUDGE MANAGEMENT REGULATORY LIAISON �- 1 . Federal Policies, Laws, Regulations, & Guidelines 2. State Policies, Laws, Regulations, & Guidelines � i 3. Local Policies, Laws, Regulations, & Guidelines 030129.OVR 7/27/90 SLUDGE MANAGEMENT EMERGING ALTERNATIVES & TECHNOLOGY 1. Chemical Fixation 2. Mechanical Composting 3. Research & Demonstration 4. Bio-conversion of Waste to Energy 5. Wildlife Enhancement 6. Transportation Systems 7. Christmas Tree Fertilization 8. Forest Fertilization 030129.OVR 7/27/90 RE: AGENDA ITEM N0, 13 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA July 31, 1990 1p ELLIS AVENUE P.0 BOXS127 \� FOUWA1N VALLEY.CAUFOFNIA 927284127 914)SS2-2411 INTERIM REPORT of the BUILDING COMMITTEE Meeting Date: July 31, 1990 - 5:30 p.m. BUILDING COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Norman E. Culver, Chairman STAFF PRESENT: Don R. Griffin James Neal J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager J. R. "Bob" Siefen Thomas M. Dawes, Director of Engineering Charles Sylvia John Linder, Construction Manager Jim Wahner Grace Winchell Absent: Wes Bannister Roland Bigonger �..i Carrey Nelson Following is an interim status report and recommendation on items that have been under consideration by the Committee. The Building Committee met at the above hour and date to review the status of two projects now in progress. They are: Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4; and Warehouse and Maintenance and Oil Storage and Dispensing Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-20. At the last Committee meeting staff briefed the members on design difficulties that we have experienced on these projects, both of which were designed by the consulting architectural firm of Pulaski and Arita. As a result, they are both behind schedule and a considerable number of change orders have been required to continue job progress on each. The staff and General Counsel reviewed the enclosed staff report dated July 25, 1990 which provides updated and more detailed information on the status of the projects and estimates of the work required to complete them. The Director of Engineering also distributed a draft of a detailed breakdown of the change orders to date that included preliminary determinations on items for which the consulting architect could potentially be responsible because of inadequate design plans and specifications. The Committee discussed the projects in considerable detail . The Members concur that the highest priority was to complete the two projects. Although there are inadequacies and errors in the architect's design documents (the architect has been placed on notice regarding the deficiencies) , Mr. Arita is now providing redesign services at no additional fee. It is the consensus of (1 of 2) Building Committee Report July 31, 1990 the Committee that at this point, as long as the architect continues to cooperate and make necessary revisions, it would be inappropriate to remove the firm and engage another. It was also decided that it would be premature to consider any formal legal action against the architect at this time, pending further review. The Committee directed staff and the General Counsel to monitor and review the construction progress and change orders and assess the potential responsibility of the consulting architect, Pulaski and Arita, for design inadequacies on Jobs J-7-4 and J-20; to review the status of the agreements between the architectural firm and its subcontracting consultants; to investigate the architect's performance bond and assets; to determine if further action on the recovery of extra project expenditures attributable to design inadequacies is warranted and/or feasible, and report back to the Committee. The staff and counsel were further directed to review the fulfillment of contractual obligations by the general contractor, J. R. Roberts Corporation, relative to the original bidding requirements pursuant to the plans and specifications, and report back to the Committee. Recommendation: The Building Committee recommends that the enclosed Change Order No.1S-fo the plans and specifications for Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4, authorizing an addition of $240,000.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation, to provide interim funding for Phases 2, 3 and 4 re: additional framing and concrete, heating and air conditioning, electrical , fire protection, plumbing, painting, plaster and stucco, insulation, and sheet metal and roof work be approved. JWS:sc Encl . (2 of 2) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS W ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA July 25, 1990 18 EW8 AVENUE AO.SO.6127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 STAFF REPORT Discussion of Administration and Warehouse/Shop Projects Design and Construction Issues SUMMARY Currently under construction are two projects designed by Pulaski and Arita Architects on which we have experienced an unusual number of design problems resulting in significant change orders, contract delays and cost overruns. The first project, the Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4, includes the construction of a new 20,000 square foot addition and the remodeling of the existing 20,000 square foot building. A contract was awarded in June 1988 to J. R. Roberts in the amount of $3,549,000. Completion was originally scheduled for March 1990. The second contract, the Warehouse and Maintenance buildings, Job No. J-20, was also awarded to J. R. Roberts in February 1989 in the amount of $3,266,000. The purpose of this staff report is to review the difficulties encountered in the design and the construction of these facilities, and brief the Directors on anticipated additional work required to complete the projects. In general , the problems with the administration building and warehouse/shop projects are the result of the fallowing. > Poor design, plans and specifications. • Contractual problems experienced by the contractor. Following is a discussion of some of the major issues which have led to the present situation. They include a discussion of deficiencies in the plans and specifications and discussion of change orders both past and present, contractual issues such as stop notices, and an estimate of future change orders necessary to complete the projects. MAJOR DESIGN PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION. JOB NO. J-7-4 A. Background This overall project included the award of several contracts, the largest awarded to the general contractor, J. R. Roberts, for $3,549,000. Other contracts were awarded for the purchase and installation of the Administration Building interior office partitioning systems and furnishings ($938,441), as well as purchase order contracts for telephone system ($49,511) and a security system ($10,116) . The architect estimated the total cost of the project at about $3,000,000, including the interior systems, telephone and security systems. The low bid for the building was $2,958,948; however, that bid was deficient and withdrawn, and award was made to the second bidder, J. R. Roberts Corporation. To date, $484,000 in change orders have been approved and 89 days added to the contract. Major change items are occurring now to keep the project moving. There are significant pending changes required and overhead issues yet to be resolved on the Administration Building Addition and, to a lesser extent, on the warehouse/shop project. Staff believes that an additional $465,000 will be necessary to complete the Administration Building Addition, raising the final cost to about $4,538,000, an increase of $989,000 by the time the project is completed, now estimated in the spring 1991. B. Discussion 1. The City of Fountain Valley found the fire protection system inadequate to serve new fire-sprinklered building. A new fire protection water line, fire hydrant, double check assembly and fire monitor system was designed by OCSD staff and added to the work after receiving approval by the City Fire Marshal. 2. No hardware schedule was included in the contract specifications resulting in delays to the project while the hardware schedule was designed by OCSD staff. Staff stopped the contractor from ordering doors and frames until the hardware schedule was finalized. All of the above were long-lead items. 3. Structural details were in many cases not clear and/or nonexistent, resulting in a great amount of OCSD staff time coordinating and obtaining additional details from Pulaski and Arita's structural consultant. These included missing shear walls, roof support members, wall stiffeners and connections. 4. The drawings lacked details on locations of plaster screeds and drip channels, resulting in additional cost for numerous additions needed to provide satisfactory wall surfaces. 5. No kitchen appliances were specified in the contract and there were no provisions made for electrical connections and venting the appliances in all three kitchens. 6. The designers under calculated the weight of the air handling units by 50%, resulting in a large change order and design effort to reinforce the roof framing in both the new south wing and the existing administration building. 7. Finishes specified in the plans and specifications were not complete and were finalized during construction of the new south wing at considerable additional cost. -2- 8. No provision was made on the plans and specifications to connect the telephone and alarm system from the new south wing to the existing administration building. ..i 9. An adequate site and roof drainage system was not included in the plans and the plans did not show where to carry the water. Additional drawings were prepared by OCSO staff to take care of this deficiency, and corrected by change order. 10. There was not sufficient space for installation of the new HVAC ductwork and interior building fire sprinkler system in the ceiling of the existing Administration Building. It was necessary to redesign the existing roof structure in order to conceal the new ductwork. 11. Foundation problems were encountered, requiring additional excavation and compaction. MAJOR DESIGN PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR WAREHOUSE AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING IMPROVEMENTS. JOB NO. J-20 A. Background This project was originally awarded in February 1989 at a cost of $3,266,000. The architect's estimate was $2,000,000. This project is now eight months late and the change orders have been approved in the amount of $237,000. The warehouse/shop project is nearly complete, and it is expected that the Directors will receive a recommendation to accept the project in either September or October of this year. Change order issues yet to be resolved on this project are estimated at about $100,000. The project is behind schedule due to design errors and contractor inefficiency. B. Discussion 1. 'Buildings were not located within the plant grid coordinate survey system. Additional survey effort was required. 2. Fire protection system was inadequate as determined by the City of Fountain Valley Fire Department inspector. New site plans were prepared showing additional fire hydrants, water lines and double check valve backflow assemblies serving each building in the complex with fire sprinklers. These new plans were then approved by the City of Fountain Valley Fire Marshal . 3. No details concerning rerouting existing water lines under or inside new buildings were in the contract documents. Rerouting details were worked out by OCSO staff. 4. Pulaski and Arita revised the architectural plans two months after the contract was awarded. This resulted in redrawing and resubmitting standard steel shop drawings at additional cost to the project. -3- 5. The documents did not include an adequate survey of the existing buildings, parapet elevations and floor elevations, especially where the new buildings abut existing. The parapet height and floor elevations of all the new buildings had to be adjusted by OCSD staff in order to match existing building elevations. 6. No adequate survey was made of existing paving grades in the area around the buildings. Paving grades had to be adjusted by OCSD staff. 7. The electrical system for the new buildings had to be completely redesigned to meet City of Fountain Valley requirements and acceptable engineering practice. CHANGE ORDERS The Directors are aware that change orders are a necessary part of construction contracts and allow the Districts to respond to changes in the most economical method. Generally, past and anticipated future change orders on these two projects are necessary to make up for design and plan deficiencies and omissions. In most cases, the change orders were design changes deemed necessary by staff or building officials. In most cases, staff would say that the changes were mandatory to complete the job and not add-ons. Had the changes been included in the original contract, as they should have been, it is fair to state that the original bid price would have been higher by the amount of the change orders. If removing and replacing contract work was necessary, and in some cases it was, then the cost of the original work, which had to be revised would be considered an extra charge. If that work was the result of faulty design, the designer should pay for the change. The Warehouse project, Job No. J-20, has required the execution of five change orders totaling some $237,000 to date. Staff believes that additional change orders yet to be finalized will total about $100,000, about a 10 percent cost increase. The Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4, has included seventeen change orders adding $484,000 plus 89 calendar days to the contract to date. Staff believes that additional change orders in the amount of $465,000 will be required, for a total of $989,000, or a 28 percent cost increase. At the meeting, staff will distribute a summary of change orders executed to date with recommendations regarding recovery of cost for each item. Staff believes that the Administration Building Addition will require major future change orders to complete the project. The remodeling of the existing building is now in progress. That remodeling has been significantly delayed because of poor design and "as-built" information and, in fact, will now have to be done in four phases instead of the three originally envisioned. The remodeling of the single-story portion has been in progress since November. That portion was originally scheduled to be completed in three months, however, work has stopped several times while new designs were completed. Design problems include inadequate structural support for the roof, failure to show -4- as-built information on existing beams requiring redesign of the HVAC, fire and electrical systems, incorrect sizing of windows requiring reordering with long-lead times, and finally to accommodate the HVAC system, the design and construction of a second roof under which HVAC, fire protection and other facilities were placed. Staff believes that future costs for Phase 2, the existing one-story remodel , and Phases 3 and 4, the two-story, yet-to-be-started remodel , will include change orders in the following amounts: Phase 2 (in progress) : 1. Framing and Concrete Estimated Cost: $90,000 Additional costs with framing the new attic roof, including roof and wall support members and concrete footings. Also, additional framing and concrete footings had to be added to support the new HVAC blower units mounted on the roof, where none was shown on the Contract drawings. The drawings did not address many other roof framing and connection details which were added in order to complete the framing. 2. Heating/Air Conditioning Estimated Cost: $55,000 Additional costs due to relocating HVAC system from above the ceiling in the existing building to the top of the roof, requiring additional labor, duct material , supply and control piping, insulation and reworking of the system shop drawings. 3. Electrical Estimated Cost: $55,000 Expanded electrical system in the telephone room, including two new 1.e panels, feeders and circuits to the panels and additional outlets and circuitry in the telephone room. Replace obsolete electrical panel in electrical utility room. Additional lighting in the new attic area. Revise electrical system due to changes in the office layout. 4. Fire Protection Estimated Cost: $22,000 Add new fire sprinkler piping and heads in the new attic area to meet City of Fountain Valley building requirements. 5. Plumbing Estimated Cost: $17,000 Add new roof drains and piping to channel water from new roof. Extend existing kitchen and bathroom vents up through new roof. Add new water connection on the north side of the existing building. Pipe roof drain downspouts on exterior of building to storm drains. 6. Painting Estimated Cost: $10,000 Telephone room expansion and revisions to office layout. Paint added sheet metal louvers and parapet caps. -5- 7. Plaster and Stucco Estimated Cost: $50,000 Includes additional costs for lathing, screeding and plastering additional exterior area resulting from addition of new raised attic area. Includes added interior drywall and finishing for revisions in .� office area and telephone room addition. 8. Glass and Glazing Estimated Cost: $ 6,000 Increased labor costs due to delays. 9. Insulation Estimated Cost: $15,000 Insulate walls and ceilings of existing building not shown on contract plans and specifications. 10. Sheet Metal Estimated Cost: $15,000 Add additional roof flashing, parapet cap, ventilators, vents and roof drain boxes due to addition of new attic area. Total Estimated Cost, Phase 2 Changes $335,000 Phases 3 and 4 1. Framing Estimated Cost: $22,000 Additional costs estimated for framing a new attic roof to hide the new HVAC ductwork, including roof and wall support members and bracing as required. 2. Heating/Air Conditioning Estimated Cost: $24,000 Additional costs due to relocating HVAC system from above the ceiling in the existing building to the top of the roof, requiring additional labor, duct material , supply and control piping, insulation and reworking of the system shop drawings. 3. Electrical Estimated Cost: $11,000 Add additional lighting in new attic area. Revise electrical system due to changes in the office layout and revise suspended ceiling lighting. 4. Fire Protection Estimated Cost: $17,000 Add new fire sprinkler piping and heads in the new attic area to meet City of Fountain Valley building requirements. 5. Plumbing Estimated Cost: $ 6,000 Add new roof drains and piping to channel water from new roof. Extend existing kitchen and bathroom vents up through new roof. Pipe roof drain downspouts on exterior of building to storm drains. -6- ..� 6. Painting Estimated Cost: $ 5,000 Paint added sheet roof flashing and parapet caps. Revisions to office ...i interiors. 7. Plaster and Stucco Estimated Cost: $22,000 Includes additional costs for sandblasting paint from existing stucco and adding new color coat to match the new south wing. This work was not included in the original contract. 8. Glass and Glazing Estimated Cost: $ 6,000 Increased labor costs due to delays. 9. Insulation Estimated Cost: $11,000 Insulate walls and ceilings of existing building not shown on the contract plans or specifications. 10. Sheet Metal Estimated Cost: $ 6,000 Add additional roof flashing, parapet cap, vents and roof drain boxes due to addition of new attic area. Total Estimated Cost, Phases 3 and 4: $130,600 The original allocation of funds between the new addition and the remodeling of the existing building was assigned on the basis of the original design plans. For the phase currently under construction, the remodeling of the one-story portion of the old building, a very substantial amount of change order work is necessary as noted above. Most of the funds originally allocated under the design contract have been expended and the contractor has been performing change order work to keep the job in progress. Staff therefore believes it would be in the. Districts best interest to approve a change order in the amount of $240,000 in order to provide sufficient funding for the project. Allocation of $240,000 at this time would not only provide continued funding, but would preclude extra charges at a later date for interest charges for unpaid, completed work. Change order work is generally being conducted in accordance with Section 10-6, Extra Work, of the General Provisions. Determining an equitable adjustment in cost for work in the original contract that is deleted, and allocating funds for the added work that is truly a change is a difficult task. Accordingly, full costs cannot yet be determined. Proposed Change Order No. 18, attached, provides $240,000 for continued work. This is somewhat less than the estimated cost to complete, therefore the Districts will not be at risk in approving this change order with final costs to be presented to the Directors at a later date. -7- CONTRACTUAL PROBLEMS Compounding the problems on this project, including time delays, has been a number of contractual problems between J. R. Roberts, the general contractor on both projects, and subcontractors working for J. R. Roberts. Certain subcontractors have filed bankruptcy, others did not pay suppliers. In total , 18 stop notices were filed against the warehouse/shop project and three against the Administration Building project. Districts' legal and engineering/- accounting costs associated with these stop notices will be recovered on future change orders. Construction activity on the administration building project has been delayed several times because of the design changes. The contractor was stopped until revisions could be issued. The contractor intends to file claims for extended overhead charges because of these delays. The warehouse/shop project has been delayed to a large extent by the contractor's own problems, including the problems with subcontractors as indicated by the unusually large number of stop notices received. Staff believes that potential overhead charges against the Administration Building can largely be offset by delays on the warehouse/shop project, which are not the fault of the Districts. Staff is negotiating change orders to each job and hopefully a trade-off can be achieved including delays caused by design changes on the Administration Building Addition and delays caused by contractor problems on the warehouse/shop project. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. It is recommended that the Building Committee consider recommending approval of proposed Change Order No. 18 to the Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4, in the amount of $240,000 to provide interim project funding approval to continue work on the project. 2. It is recommended that the Building Committee direct staff and General Counsel to continue review of change orders and design responsibility on both contracts as well as investigation of the assets of the designer, Pulaski and Arita Architects, to determine if further action in the recovery of extra project expenditures is warranted, and/or feasible. ENG/BLDG.COMM:SR2 -8- `.,/ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Eighteen (18) CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE August 8. 1990 JOB: Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Oaduct) $ 240,000.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - PHASE 2 ADDITIONAL WORK This change order provides interim funding for progress payments for completed work. Final costs will be addressed on a future change order. The Contractor was directed to proceed with additional work on Phase 2, 3 and 4 of the existing Administration Building remodel . This additional work is presently ongoing and final costs will be determined upon completion. This item of work is being accomplished on a time and material basis pursuant to Section / 10-6(b) (2) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 56, 56A, 56C, 57, 60) Work completed to date includes: 1. Framing and Concrete Additional costs with framing the new attic roof, including roof and wall support members and concrete footings. Also, additional framing and concrete footings had to be added to support the new HVAC blower units mounted on the roof, where none was shown on the Contract drawings. The drawings did not address many other roof framing and connection details which were added in order to complete the framing. Allowance: $ 75,000 2. Heating/Air Conditioning Additional costs due to relocating HVAC system from above the ceiling in the existing building to the top of the roof, requiring additional labor, duct material , supply and control piping, insulation and reworking of the system shop drawings. Allowance: $ 40,000 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92798 CHANGE ORDER �../ C.O. NO. Eighteen (18) CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE August 8. 1990 JOB: ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION. JOB NO. J-7-4 3. Electrical Expanded electrical system in the telephone room, including two new panels, feeders and circuits to the panels and additional outlets and circuitry in the telephone room. Replace obsolete electrical panel in electrical utility room. Additional lighting in the new attic area. Revise electrical system due to changes in the office layout. Allowance: $ 40,000 4. Fire Protection Add new fire sprinkler piping and heads in the new attic area to meet City of Fountain Valley building requirements. Allowance: f 20,000 5. Plumbing Add new roof drains and piping to channel water from new roof. Extend existing kitchen and bathroom vents up through new roof. Add new water connection on the north side of the existing building. Pipe roof drain downspouts on exterior of building to storm drains. Allowance: $ 10,000 6. Painting Telephone room expansion and revisions to office layout. Paint added sheet metal louvers and parapet caps. Allowance: $ 5,000 7. Plaster and Stucco Includes additional costs for lathing, screeding and plastering additional exterior area resulting from addition of new raised attic area. Includes added interior drywall and finishing for revisions in office area and telephone room addition. �..i Allowance: $ 35,000 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92798 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Eighteen (18) CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE August 8. 1990 JOB: ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION. JOB NO. J-7-4 8. Insulation Insulate walls and ceilings of existing building not shown on contract plans and specifications. Allowance: $ 5,000 9. Sheet Metal/Roof Add additional roof flashing, parapet cap, ventilators, vents and roof drain boxes due to addition of new attic area. Allowance: $ 10,000 Total Allowable, Phase 2 Changes $240,000 TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $240,000 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: Calendar Days SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date July 11, 1988 Original Contract Time 602 Calendar Days Original Completion Date March 4, 1990 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 89 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 691 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date June 1, 1990 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not-Applicable The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that _ days' extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92798 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Eighteen (18) CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corooration DATE August 8, 1990 JOB: ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION. JOB NO. J-7-4 Original Contract Price $ 3,549,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 484,204.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 240.000.00 Amended Contract Price $ 4,273,204.00 Board Authorization Date: August 8, 1990 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED BY: RECOMMENDED BY: v Engineer Date Construction Manager Date APPROVED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Director of Engineering Date General Counsel Date J. R. ROBERTS CORPORATION ACCEPTED BY: Contractor Date RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS AI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA July 25, 1990 1064 EW6<VENUE PO SOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CAUMPNIA 927204121 01412E2XA11 REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Mee ng Date: July 25, 1990 - 5:30 p.m. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Present: Director James Neal Director J. R. "Bob" Siefen William Mahoney Vice Joint Chairman Director Sally Anne Sheridan Don R. Griffin Past Joint Chairman Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Richard B. Edgar Past Joint Chairman Norman E. Culver Past Joint Chairman STAFF PRESENT: James Wahner Chairman, District 1 Iry Pickier Chairman, District 2 J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Richard Palis Chairman, District 3 Blake Anderson, Director of Tech. Services Evelyn Hart. Chairman, District 5 Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering Ruthelyn Plummer Chairman, District 6 Michael R. Deblieux, Director of Personnel Grace Winchell Chairman, District 11 Gary Streed, Director of Finance Hank Wedaa Chairman, District 13 Ed Hodges, Sr. Facilities Manager, Peer A. Swan Chairman, District 14 Maintenance Roger Stanton County Supervisor Bob Ooten, Assistant Superintendent, Operations � Absent: Buck Catlin Joint Chairman Don E. Smith Chairman, District 7/Past JC - Don Roth County Supervisor 1) Selection of Senior Manager/Underwriter and Bond Counsel for Debt Issues. A. Senior Manager/Underwriter At the February meeting, the Fiscal Policy Committee reviewed the alternatives of hiring an independent financial advisor or working directly with an underwriting firm to analyze and structure the Districts' long-range financing and borrowing program. After considerable discussion, the Committee recommended the hiring of an underwriting firm to directly market debt issues and to provide financial advisory services. Because of an underwriting firm' s daily contacts in the marketplace, they are expected to only recommend a borrowing package that will be readily accepted and purchased, which will result in reduced interest rates and costs. The Committee further recommended that staff be augmented to provide in-house ability to Interact in the bond market and to work directly with underwriters. The Executive Committee and the Joint Boards of Directors concurred with these recommendations and authorized solicitation of proposals from underwriters and special bond counsel . (1 of 6) Executive Committee Report July 25, 1990 At their last meetings, the Fiscal Policy and Executive Committees reviewed staff's proposal to complete an initial debt issuance within the next four months in order to provide the funding needed over the next one to two years for our master-planned construction program, in accordance with the financial plan approved by the Boards in July, 1989. In order to streamline the process, the Committees recommended that RFP's be mailed to only a select group of prequalified underwriting firms based on certain criteria. Firms recommended have been the leading underwriters in California municipal and/or sewer and water Issues in 1989, have New York and California offices and have clients In Orange County. Proposals from five firms were received an Wednesday, July 11th, and are summarized on the enclosed matrix (pink). The Fiscal Policy Committee reported that they had reviewed the proposals, and heard oral presentations from each of the five under- writing firms and conducted a question and answer period at their July 18th meeting. After considerable review and discussion, Merrill Lynch Capital Markets was selected by the Fiscal Policy Committee to be the senior manager/underwriter for the Districts' debt securities issues. (Enclosed are copies of the transmittal letter and executive summary from the Merrill Lynch response to the Districts' request for proposals (tan package). The executive summary highlights, in outline form, their responses to the eight (8) major questions contained in the RFP. The presentation/discussion guide booklet (white package) , distributed as part of the oral interview, is also enclosed. This booklet was considered in detail by the Fiscal Policy Committee and \../ each of Merrill 's financing team members listed was present at the interview.) Several Executive Committee Members inquired of staff and the Fiscal Policy Committee Members regarding use of co-managers for bond underwriting services, particularly in view of the previous Board decision not to engage a consulting financial advisor; and requested the reasons for selecting Merrill Lynch. Members of the Fiscal Policy Committee then reviewed the selection process. It was pointed out that all of the firms interviewed were qualified to provide underwriting services, but it was felt that Merrill Lynch had the best written proposal and oral presentation. The cost of underwriting services is'basically the same regardless of the firm selected. Another major consideration was that Merrill 's proposed financial team is based in Southern California and was also at the Interview. Some of the firms were asked if it was necessary in their view to have co-managers for the proposed debt issuance and they Indicated that it was not. It was also pointed out that part of the overall financial management program approved by the Boards' was to develop in-house expertise. The new Financial Manager's staff position authorized by the Boards is expected to be filled before the first debt issue, by a candidate with several years of municipal debt experience who is currently an Assistant Vice-President of an _ Independent financial advisory consulting firm. (2 of 6) Executive Committee Report July 25, 1990 Following further discussion the Executive Committee took the following action: Recommendation: The Executive Committee recommends the exclusive appointment of Merrill Lynch Capital Markets as the senior manager/ underwriter for providing underwriting and financial advisory services for debt securities issues pursuant to the Long Range Financial Plan adopted as part of the Districts' 1989 Master Plan. Supervisor Stanton observed that each Committee Member views the debt securities borrowing program issues from a different perspective, and reiterated that the County utilizes co-managers for debt issues and, therefore, requested that his vote in opposition to the recommendation be made a matter of record. B. Bond Counsel At the June Fiscal Policy Committee meeting the General Counsel , Tom Woodruff, reviewed six firms that had been prequalified as candidates to serve as special bond counsel. The Committee instructed Mr. Woodruff to interview the fines of Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander and Ferdon, and Orrick and Herrington, to serve as co-counsel with the General Counsel 's firm, Rourke 6 Woodruff for the Districts' debt securities issuance program. �..i The Fiscal Policy Committee reported that at the July 18th meeting Mr. Woodruff reviewed his recommendation (ivory enclosure) that the Districts select the law firm of Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander and Ferdon. After considerable discussion, the Committee concurred with the General Counsel 's recommendation to hire Mudge Rose, the firm that served as bond counsel for the 1986 COP issue of Districts 1, 2 and 3. In response to an inquiry as to why he had favored the other firm under consideration for special bond counsel , Director Swan indicated that he merely wanted to assure that the bond counsel selected would be forthright and provide appropriate information and advice to the Directors during the process and, with that understanding, moved for approval of Mudge Rose by the Executive Committee. Recommendation: The Executive Committee recommends authorization to execute an agreement with Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander and Ferdon to serve as Districts' co-bond counsel with Rourke and Woodruff for the Districts' debt securities issues pursuant to the Long Range Financial Plan adopted as part of the Districts' 1989 Master Plan. 2) Status of Purchase of Surface Easements and Sub-Surface Oil and Mineral Rights at Treatment Plant No. 2. From time to time, the Directors have been briefed on the necessity to acquire existing oil well facilities and drilling rights owned by others in the northerly half of the Huntington Beach treatment plant site; and the Boards of (3 of 6) Executive Committee Report July 25, 1990 Directors have authorized staff and General Counsel to negotiate for purchase of the surface easements and sub-surface oil and mineral rights. The oil rigs preceded the acquisition of the site for a treatment plant by the Districts. When the Districts acquired the land in fee, the current owners of the leases retained drilling rights (some at specific locations) , the right of access and the right to install oil lines as required. The Districts receive approximately $8,000 annually in royalties from these leases. In accordance with the 1989 Master Plan, the 110-acre Huntington Beach treatment plant is planned to be fully developed with treatment facilities over the next 30 years. That development requires that the interfering oil facilities be removed. It appears advantageous to proceed now with the acquisition of the oil facilities, including the wells, mineral rights and lessor rights, since most of the wells are not in production and oil prices are low. Babson and Shepherd Petroleum Engineers have prepared an appraisal of the oil well facilities at the treatment plant. There are two operating leases, the D. W. Elliot, adjacent to the Santa Ana River, and the Karales, which covers most of the area between Banning Avenue and Bushard Street (see enclosed Master Plan and Oil Well Interference Plan, Exhibits A (gray) and B (green tint)). The appraisal , dated May 23, 1990, determined that the acquisition of the oil and gas producing interests for the two leases and the associated oil production facilities have an estimated value as follows: 1. Acquisition of property A. D. W. Elliot $240,000 `. County of Orange 98,600 Sanitation Districts (not a cost) 23,700 B. Karales Lease Pacific Energy Resources $120,000 Lessor Group 25,200 Overriding Royalty Owners 32,500 2. Lease Well Abandonment $50,000 - $100,000 3. Lease Facilities Removal Unknown costs, possibly contaminated soil 4. Salvage Value Nil Staff reported that based on preliminary discussions with some of the owners of these rights they are doubtful that the Districts will be able to negotiate all of the acquisitions. Therefore, it is anticipated that it will be necessary to condemn some of the sites for Districts' use under eminent domain proceedings. Staff further reported that one of the current master-planned projects now in design is the new 120-inch diameter interplant treated wastewater line and other interplant utilities, including communication, gas and water facilities. (4 of 6) ` Executive Committee Report July 25, 1990 Acquisition and removal of oil facilities at this time is necessary to allow the new line to be placed in the master-planned location. Exhibits A and B show the master-planned facilities, oil facilities and the potential for conflict. Clearing of the Elliot lease by summer 1991 is necessary to avoid Impacting project schedules. Recommendation: Staff, therefore, recommended: (1) authorization for the General Manager and General Counsel to offer to purchase, in the amount Indicated in the appraisal , all of the described oil facilities, leases and mineral rights; and (2) authorization for the General Counsel to institute eminent domain proceedings against any operator or leaseholder to acquire said sites or rights, if necessary; and (3) authorization to solicit proposals for the preparation of plans and specifications for the abandonment and removal of the oil facilities. The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendation. 3) Pre ualification of E ui ment Su Hers and/or Prepurchase of Equipment for Upcoming Treatment Plant onstruction Projects. Enclosed with the supporting material is a separate staff report (salmon) and recommendations concerning proposed prequalification of suppliers and/or authorization to negotiate sole source purchases of certain major equipment items for upcoming sewerage treatment plant expansions and improvements. Recommendation: The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendations as fo owT� s: (a) Approving prequalification of the following suppliers of influent pumps and variable frequency drive required in connection with Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-1: Influent Pumps: (1) Fairbanks-Morse . (3) Patterson (2) Allis Chalmers (4) Gould Variable Frequency Drives: (1) Westinghouse (5) Allen Bradley (2) Brown Boveri (6) General Electric (3) Ross Hill (7) Louis Allis (4) Toshiba (b) Authorizing staff to negotiate with Parkson Corporation for the sole source purchase of Wyss aeration diffusers for use in Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36. (c) Authorizing staff to negotiate with The Budd Company for the sole source purchase of sludge collectors for use in Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2. (5 of 6) Executive Committee Report ' July 25, 1990 (d) Approving prequalification of the following suppliers of computers and associated equipment that will interface with the Districts' existing equipment required in connection with Plant 1 Control Center Instrumentation, Job No. J-23-2, and Replacement of Computerized Monitoring System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-44: (1) Bailey Controls (4) Johnson Yokogawa (2) Allen Bradley (5) Westinghouse (3) Fischer 8 Porter 4) Status Report on Industrial Waste Enforcement Action Litigation. The General Counsel briefed the Committee on the status of separate legal proceedings filed by Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson and Universal Circuits, Inc. , over industrial waste enforcement actions taken by the Districts (see enclosed (green) and (gold) memoranda). Mr. Woodruff also reported on the status of the appeal by Universal Circuits concerning staff denial of a permit for their new facility on South Yale Street in Santa Ana. Universal 's assets at this facility are apparently in the process of being acquired by a new owner/operator. The status of the appeal scheduled to be heard by the Committee on August 1 is, therefore, somewhat in question. Mr. Woodruff advised that the Committee Members would be informed of any further developments affecting the scheduled hearing. (See further discussion below under Item 6.) `/ 5) Closed Session re Personnel Matters. The Vice Joint Chairman convened the Executive Committee in closed session for a discussion of personnel matters. Enclosed is a separate confidential report and recommendation from the Comnittee. If any Director wishes to further discuss the report or recommendation, the Joint Chairman will adjourn to closed session at the regular August 8 Board Meeting. 6) Adjourn to August 1, 1990 - 5:30 p.m. re Appeal of Universal Circuits. Because of a lack of a quorum for the July 12th special meeting to consider an appeal by Universal Circuits of staff denial of a permit for their new facility on South Yale Street in Santa Ana, the meeting was rescheduled to August 1, 1990 at 5:30 p.m. The Committee members were reminded to bring the supporting agenda material for this hearing that was mailed with the July 12th Notice. The Committee then adjourned to 5:30 p.m. on August 1, 1990, subject to any forthcoming developments relative to the requested appeal hearing as noted above under Item 4. (NOTE: Subsequently, on July 31st Universal Circuits withdrew their appeal (see enclosed (lavender) letter), and the scheduled hearing was canceled.) (6 of 6) Revised .8/90 ` UNDERWRITER KEY FACTS SUMMARY JULY - 1990 No. of Avg. 1989 1969 Est'd. Fixed Municipal Municipal So. Fixed Variable Remarketing Other Firm vs. Issues Issues Calif. Rate Rate per Costs of (Alphabetical) Structure Variable Managed Managed Office Spread Spread $1,000 Issuance Dean Witter Marks-Roos Pool Variable $10 Million 13 N $ 8.00 $3.00 $1.25 $7.31(A) Merrill Lynch Two-tiered, Fixed: $45 Million 27 Y $ 7.50/ $3.75/ $1.25 $1.70 individual Senior $11.50 $6.50 Districts Variable: combine to Subordinate issue Paine Webber Marks-Roos Pool Variable/ $50 Million 25 Y $ 9.20 $2.55 $1.00 $1.33 Convert Prudential- Calif. Special Fixed $22 Million 23 Y $12.25(B) - - 0 Bache Diet. Assn. Smith Barney Marks-Roos Pool Combination $34 Million 36 Y $ 9.28 $4.63 $1.25 $3.15(C) (A) Includes consulting engineer (B) Includes costs of issuance (C) Average of fixed and variable, includes letter of credit, includes feasibility consultant Merrill Lynch Capital Markets 400 South Hope Street Suite 2020 Los Angeles.California 9007I 2821 213 683 4696 Stephen R. .t Vice Reside;[ Modcip::Markets July 11,1990 Mr.Gary Screed Director of Finance County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,California 92708-8127 Dear Gary. Merrill Lynch is pleased to present our qualificadous to serve as the Districts'underwriter. It has been our pleasure to work with you over the past several months and we hope our proposal will reflect the in- formation and insialas into CSDOC which you have provided us. Merrill Lvnch would consider the chance to work with CSDOC a tremendous opportunity. As implemen- tation of the financial plan proceeds,the Districts oHu many exciting challenges to develop and imple- ment a flexible and responsive financing structure. Working with CSDOC to meet those challenges and enhance CSDOC's preeminent position within the State is a very rare opportunity indeed. Additionally,we believe Merrill Lynch is best qualified to assist CSDOC as it develops its capital program. Our qualifications are detailed in the proposal,but to summarize briefly. • Watu and Sewer Experience: Merrill Lynch has senior managed 177 water and sewer financings totalling over 565 billion since 1986. The total includes 31 senior managed California issues • California Experience: Merrill Lynch has been the dominant firm in California during the past decade. We have lead the competition in amount of senior managed transactions completed in she of the past eight yews. • Knowledgeol'Southern California WatuandSewuMarkeC Merrill Lynchcurrendyserves assenior banker for several of the Districts'peers in the Southland. We believe our experience with these is- suers enhances our ability to serve CSDOC. • Experienced Banking Team: The bankers assigned to CSDOC's acc ust have significant experience with all types of financings,and have extensive experience with agencies such as CSDOC. No other firm can offer this depth of experience. • Commitment to CSDOC: We believe no other firm can match our commitment to the Districts We relish the opportunity to work with CSDOC to develop the best possible financing program and are willing to devote the time and resources to make sure that goal is realized. Again,we thank you for the time you have given us in helping formulate our ideas. We look forward to presenting our qualifications and structuring ideas to you shortly. If you have any questions in the mean- time,please:don't hesitate to call. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Resl,onse to Request for Proposals gN, Art,* 3 av pe• Is, n 19S OA"'t'CE coo"� County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Jul. 11. 1990 +,Z Merrill Lynch r `+ Executive Summary Ovenvew: As we outline in our proposal,it is our desire to serve CSDOC beyond the initial issuance. Therefore,we have answered the questions with a long- term view of CSDOC addressing the advantages and challenges which will effect the Districts. Question A: Unique Features: Unique features of CSDOC and • Sole Provider of Essential Services. Merrill Lynch's recommendation of an initial ismance structure, • Minimal Fluctuations in Net Revenue. based upon those unique features. • Minimal Delinquency Problems. • Raze Advantage versus Comparable Systems. • Growth Potential of Orange County. • Current Reserves and Financial Strength. • Historically Infrequent Issuer. Challenges: • Maintenance of Reserves. • Preservation of Smootb User Fee Increases. • Ambitious Capital Program. • Multiple Issuers with Different Credits. • Cashflow Mismatch. Recommendation: Merrill Lynch recommends a three part initial financial structure: • Maintenance of Sufficient Reserves through early use of COPS. • Development of Integrated Long Term Borrowing Program that accesses both: Fixed Rate,Senior Lien Debt. ° Subordinate Len,Floating Rate Debt. ac lr4merrllt Lynch County Sanitation Districts of Orange County — Page i Executive Summary • Development of Interim Funding Program for infra-yearbor- rowings. Rationale: Maintenancc of reserves, development of an integrated fixed and floating rate program, and development of an interim borrowing program will provide increased Bexibilky and minimize the total cost of the capital program for the Districts. The chart below summarizes: Flexibility Program Cost Advantages Advantages Maintenance of Allows Districts great Taxable Investment Reserves latitude in fee increases, Rates exceed borrowing and timing,market entry, rates so positive and project selection. carrying costs. Fried and Combination of two Blending of two rates Floating Debt debt types provides for lowers borrowing costs favorable sizing and while,.,in6.,,6,i,o call provisions interest rate risk Interim Borrowing Allows for greater Preserves reserve budgeting flexibility levels,thus increasing arbitrage potential We recommend the initial transaction components be structured as follows: P...nun Perms csooc n8M I� 9anawng ��� tBT Fhr FNun FdM PMe CCPe Pen WR tpy Vulege FNun Va,leW Pen CCPe Ptle COF4 Mtie Merrill Lynch County Sanitation Districts of Orange County— Page ii Executive Summary Question 9: Approach to Work: It is our goal to provide not only underwriting services, but all financial related services that will be appropriate for the Districts. Servica,dernil lynch wfilprowde Our commitment would not be defined by the financing calendar,but rather as underwriter and our approach by the needs of the Districts. We summarize briefly. to die work • Advisory Services: Development of financial products, market updates,research into municipal markets and credit development. • Underwriting/17modng: Preparation of financial structure, coordination of all documentation, all appropriate sizing analyses, development of ratings, soliciting all appropriate team members,and pricing and sale of securities. • Calendar of Financing: We anticipate that an introductory meeting in early August would accommodate a late October closing QuestionC Relationship with Investors: Merrill Lynch has a comprehensive distribu- tion system for the marketing of the Districts'securities: Merrill Lynch}market knowledge and relationships with investon Institutional Distribution: and credit enhancement and in. venmenrproviders • 404 Institutional Financial Consultants covering 55,000 ac- counts. • 2Institttional Offices in California. Retail Distribution: • 457 Offices and over 10,000 Financial Consultants. • 54 Offices and 1=Financial Consultants in California. • 5 Offices and I50 Financial Consultants in Orange County. Relationships with Credit Rnhancers(Investment Providers: Of sig- nificant importance to the Districts is the investment banker's ability to bring additional team members to the Districts at attractive prices We maintain extensive ties with all potential credit enhancers, and we stay abreast of continuing trends in the industry. Additionally,we maintain a full time staff within Municipal Markets whose specific responsibility is to assist municipal issuers with structuring the appropriate investment strategy. MMarrill Lynch County Sanitation Distncts of Orange County— Page iH Executive Summary Question D: Primary Challenge CSDOC's primary challenge is to convince the rating agencies that its sizeable capital program can be completed withnaW Merrill Lvnch's approach to deterioration of the Districts'financial health while developing a uniform presenting CEDOC to the rating rating agency view on the various Districts'financings. agencies. Our strategy to the Rating Agencies would be as follows: • Emphasize the Unique Features of the Districts as mentioned in question A. • Prepare the following exhibits to emphasize CSDOC's health: Ten Year Operating Forecasts Reflecting Additional Borrowing. Anticipated Fee increases by CSDOC. ° Bees CasdVorst Case Interest Rate Scenarios. ° Financial Policy Statement as Adopted by the Board. Security Features of the Various Structures Proposed. Question E., We propose the following spread ranges for feed and variable rate trans- actions: Our fee proposal. Variable Rate Transaction: 53.75-650 per bond. Fixed Rate Transaction 5750-1150 per bond. Question F., The financing team primary contacts will be Samuel B. Corliss, Jr. and Stephen R.Coma. The entire Merrill Lynch team is available on a 24 hour The proposed financing team. a day basis to assist the Districts in implementing the finance plan. Question G: As provided herein. References: Question H: Summary of Experience Merrill Lynch's experience with Water and Sewer issuers and California issuers is extensive. To illustrate: Additional Information and EEC information. • Top ranked senior manager of California municipal issues in six of the past eight years. zMerrill Lynch County Sanitation Districts of Orange County— Page iv Executive Summary a Top ranked senior manager of water and sewer issues in California in 1988 and 1989. Long-Term Commitment to the Municipal Market: The municipal market is a core business for Merrill Lynch. Our fum is committed to serving the needs of governmental, individual and institutional clients. We will con- tinue to provide stability for our clients in banking,underwriting and trad. ing. ra oaa Merrill Lynch County Sanitation Districts of Orange County -- Page v Presentation to: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County July 18, 1990 Financing Team Banking Samuel B. Corliss, Jr. Primary Contact for CSDOC Western Region Manager Managing Director Douglas W. Hamilton Variable Rate & Managing Director Investment Products Stephen R. Coma Transaction Banker Vice President Jeffrey D. Bower Technical Support Senior Analyst Underwriting John Tresch Senior Underwriter Director i Why Merrill Lynch • Experience • Distribution Capabilities • Expertise and Commitment 2 � 1 � National Underwriting Experience* (1985 to 1989) All Municipal Issues Water & Sewer Only Principal Amount Principal Amount 0 10 20 30 40 50 fill 70 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 I HT—i—i Goldman, Sachs Merrill Lynch Merrill Lynch PaineWebber Smith Barney Smith Barney First Boston Goldman, Sachs Lehman Brothers Morgan Stanley lip 0 Full Credit to Lead Manger on Negotiated.Senior Managed Transactions. (All Amounts in$Billions) R California Underwriting Experience* (1985 to 1989) All Municipal Issues Water & Sewer Only Principal Amount Principal Amount 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Merrill Lynch Merrill Lynch Goldman, Sachs Stone& Youngberg Stone& Youngberg Smith Barney Salomon Brothers Salomon Brothers PaineWebber Ir PaineWebber •Full Credit to Lead Manager on Negotiated,Senior Managed Transactions. (All Arnomis in$Billions) 4 Orange County Underwriting Experience* (1985 to 1989) Principal Amount 0 0.5 I Merrill Lynch Smith Barney Drexel Bumham Stone&Youngberg Salomon Brothers •Full Credit to Lead Manager on Negotiated,Senior Managed Fransactiam.(All Amounts in$llilhons) California VRDO Underwriting Experience* (1985 to 1989) Principal Amount 0 2 3 Merrill Lynch Goldman, Sachs E.F. Hutton First Boston PaineWebber •Full Credit to Lead Manager on Negotiated.Senior Managed''Fransactions.(All Amounts in$Billions) M California Underwriting Experience* (1990 Year-to-Date) Principal Amount 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 OA 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 Merrill Lynch , Stone& Youngberg Lehman Brothers PaineWebber Morgan Stanley •Full Credit to Lead Manager on Negotiated.Senior Managed Transactions.(All Amounts in$Billions) 7 V'�7 Experience with California Water & Sewer Agencies Senior Managed Clients Orange County Water District Water Facilities Authority Irvine Ranch Water District Metropolitan Water District of Southern California City of Big Bear Lake North of River Sanitation District No. 1 Financial Advisory Clients Municipal Water District of Orange County Co-Managed Clients Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District PAPP 8 M Bringing Financing Expertise to CSDOC Financing Techniques: • Fixed Rate Debt • Variable Rate Debt • Interim Funding • Reserve Policies 9 Bringing Financing Expertise to CSDOC Rating Agency Strategies: • Improving the Strong Credit of CSDOC • Creating a Unified Credit 10 !'l Commitment to CSDOC Long Term Planning: • Integration of Finance Plan with CSDOC Strategy Day to Day Participation: • Budgeting • Contract Negotiation 9 Ongoing Participation in All Financial Processes California Marketing and Distribution Capabilities Merrill Lynch Offices in California California Institutional "a- • 2 Offices • 50 Financial Consultants California Retail • 53 Offices • 1 145 Financial Consultants � " � CALIFORNIA Orange County Presence • 5 Offices • 146 Financial Consultantsa �." 12 1 Hypothetical Bond Sales Allocation by Purchaser Fixed Rate Variable Rate Bank R tul Bank T..ts Tritins Buyns 1.0% 1.0% 5.0% 4DII (bgvimbns4 Bnlail?M1 k33.0%33.0% nd Funds .0% Bond Funds 40.0% 13 J.J. Kenny Index vs. MLCM California Index January 1985 to Present 10 V 9 MLCM California Index m 8 ro 7 r 0 6 en co 5Z)Qj J.J. Kenny Index a 4 6 3 T A 2 O 0 1 3 0 01/03/85 06/15/86 09/24/87 02/02/89 06/12/90 14 J.J . Kenny Index vs. California "AA" Utility Bond Index January 1985 to Present 10 , ._ s California "AA" Utility Bond Index ,Q 8 v 7 � r Q) 6 bD 5 J.J. Kenny Index L 4y 9 a III _T x 2 + W 1 3 01 /03/85 05/15/86 09/24/87 02/02/89 07/03 00 Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis (Fiscal Year 95- 96) 500 400 ■ Current Rates 300 (7.257,) Value ■ Rates �� I 200 5.00% ■ Rates (� 100 10 OW 0.� lk - Net Revenues Reserve Coverage Balance if) VDU Base Case vs. Scenario #3 (Fiscal Year 95-96) 500T 400 300 Base Case Value ■ Scenario f/tS 200 ------- 100 A&M0 + Net Revenues Reserve Coverage Balance Base Case vs. 2 Years of Capitalized Interest (Fiscal Year 95-96) 700 600 500 ■ Base Case 400 Value ! ■ 2 Years 300 Capitalized Interest 200 100 0 Net Revenues Reserve Coverage Balance 18 Base Case vs. Scenario #3 Assuming 50% of Debt Issuance as Subordinate Lien (Fiscal Year 95-96) 500 400 300 ■ Base Case (with Jr. Lien) Value 200 ■ Scenario #3 (with Jr. Lien) 100 0 Net Reserve Coverage Revenues Balance 19 MIZZ Base Case vs. Annual Reserve Draws to Partially Fund Capital Expenditures (Fiscal Year 95-96) 500 400 ■ Base Case 300 Value ■ Projects Partially 200 Funded by i Reserve Draws 100 0 Net Revenues Reserve Coverage Balance 20 MCI- Key to Charts Net Revenues: Amounts in Millions of Dollars Reserve Balance: Amounts in Millions of Dollars Coverage Ratio: Amount is 100x Coverage Ratio APPENDIX W 4 RALES TANK FARM ® ®O ® pW ON I O i U9 W I / RALES D.W. ELLIOT II WELLu2 WELL 0 I / O.W. ELLIOT wa.L u 3 II m - of i KARALES WELL 9 1 W Eg Q WELL #14T a- wE 1LMB $ 1 I ° C Q / ` ELLKARALES WELLs x lo.; om WELL * 2 ,�II PSPs P� I� BANNING AVENUE -- a ` rA Q I W / alN 4 Ih 8J1>aTdSIOH OIBT8ICS8 or 091i� C008Si. CALI101® e MASTER PLAN AND v OIL Wfl1 INTHtF$tBdCE PLAN EXH31T A envm N.T.S. n iu rt a a O O KARALES i TANK FARM ® g QIQ 1 1 D.W. ELLIOT RALES WELL 0 1 I WELL it2 rm d e D.W. * 3 I om i WELL 7C 3 — C W I KARALES `v ` I HS, �ES WELL S 1 i _ I WELL M3 + D.W. ELLIOT RALE� u WELL O 4 I . WELL a>B I KARA NU I ;t 2 // N'ELLi q WELL*S DIN WELL LIOT P f /�---- - —� --- o III BANNING AVENUE -L WAI a f a SECONDARY FACILITIES I JQy 9 RELATED FACILITIES WOULD REQUIRE TOTAL REDESIGN. 2 1 v / PROPOSED ROUTE IF OIL / s WELLS ARE NOT ACQUIRED WHICH WOULD FORCE I ' CHANGER IN THE MASTER PLAN LAYOUT. y / R SCALE- N.T.S. ��� ODO@t! YABISASZOH DSASRZClB of 4m � fd0'L'Tr CALD09ffil MASTER PLAN AND OIL WELL HMFER04CE PLAN EXHIBIT B N.T.S. a® v. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .1 ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA July 18, 1990 t OBu EWS>VFNUF Pa BZ 8'27 F NTAIN VALLEY,C UMRNMMnM127 mAi Bsazan STAFF REPORT AUTHORIZATION TO PREQUALIFY AND PREPURCHASE EQUIPMENT BACKGROUND Under design are several treatment plant improvement projects for which the designers and staff believe the Districts' interests would best be served by prequalifying and/or prepurchasing certain major items of equipment. The projects for which authority is requested include the following: Job No. Title Equipment (1) P2-42-1 Electrification of Pump Drives at Pumps, and variabl Treatment Plant No. 2 frequency drives �a) (2) P1-36 Secondary Treatment Improvements Aeration diffusers(b) at Plant No. 1 (3) P2-42-2 Secondary Treatment Expansion at Sludge collectors(b) Plant No. 2 (4) J-23-2, Plant 1 Control Center Computer and psociated P2-44 Instrumentation equipment(a) (a)Prequalify suppliers. (b)Prepurchase equipment from sole source. These projects provide for the expansion of the existing secondary treatment facilities at both plants from a total rated capacity of 141 mgd to 190 mgd; the replacement of old, engine-driven pumps with new motors and variable frequency drives, as well as the replacement of a number of large influent pumps, motors and drives; and, finally, replacement and upgrading of computer monitoring and control equipment. Throughout the design process, it has become apparent that the Districts should consider prequalifying the manufacturers for certain important equipment items. In two cases, the designers and staff are recommending that the Directors authorize prepurchase negotiations with a sole source manufacturer; while in three other cases the designers and staff are recommending that the number of manufacturers be limited to those identified as being able to furnish known, quality equipment with a proven experience record for the purpose indicated. Following is a discussion of each project, specific equipment procurement recommendations, and the reason for the recommendations. Staff Report July 18, 1990 Page Two 1. ELECTRIFICATION OF PUMP DRIVES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-42-1 a. Influent Pumps This project includes the replacement of existing engine-driven pumps with new drives, motors and pumps. In total , ten pumps will be replaced with higher efficiency pumps (the motors and drives are discussed below) . The existing pumps are old with low pump efficiencies; reuse of these pumps with new direct drive motors is not recommended. The design engineers have investigated all known manufacturers, and based upon their evaluation, have selected four that could be used by the Districts. Prequalifying suppliers of this equipment will allow an installation maximizing utilization of existing facilities, using new high efficiency and high reliability equipment, and a considerable monetary savings to the Districts during construction. Recommendation The designer, John Carollo Engineers, in conjunction with staff, has recommended that four manufacturers be prequalified to supply the pumps, as follows: Fairbanks-Morse Allis Chalmers Patterson Gould The estimated purchase price of the ten pumps is about $1,500,000. The complete survey report, Exhibit No. 1, is attached. b. Variable Frequency Drives (VFD) Most pumps are now driven by internal combustion engines. Included within the conditions of the SCAQMD Central Power Generation Systems Permit to Construct is the requirement to replace these older, less efficient engines with electric motor drives. The designers have recommended a combination of constant and variable speed drives. In addition to replacing engine drives at Headworks "B" and "C", new drives are required at the Plant Water and Primary Effluent Pump Stations. In total, some 16 new drive motors are required. Available large drives vary widely in construction quality, efficiency, reliability and are a noise source. The design engineers have investigated all known manufacturers and based upon their evaluation, have selected seven who could be used by the Districts. Staff Report July 18, 1990 Page Three Recommendation: The suppliers recommended by John Carollo and staff, based on manufacturers submittals, interviews and CSDOC experience, are: Westinghouse Brown Boveri Ross Hill Toshiba Allen Bradley General Electric Louis Allis The cost of the motor drives is about $2,000,000. The designer's summary, Exhibit No. 2, is attached. 2. SECONDARY TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-36 Aeration Diffusers Job No. P1-36 will expand the secondary treatment capacity of Plant No. 1 from 46 mgd to 80 mgd average daily flow. This can be done by improvements . . to the aeration system and by the addition of secondary clarifiers. This request deals with the purchase of new aeration diffusers, the device for delivering the air to the basins and transferring the air into the wastewater. Investigating flow aeration diffusers currently on the market reveals a wide range in type, efficiency and durability. The Districts now use Wyss diffusers within the basins. When originally installed to replace another system, we experienced an increase in treatment efficiency of 25% and reduced energy demand. The proposed refurbishing would increase the number of diffusers from the current level of about 13,000 to 40,000. Yearly, portions of aeration basins are removed from service for maintenance, including the replacement of damaged diffusers. The replacement of the existing Wyss diffusers with all new Wyss diffusers would allow the Districts to match all the existing parts used in the other basins and existing diffusers found salvageable can be used for future maintenance replacement at an overall cost savings. The Wyss diffusers have worked well and demonstrated low maintenance costs and energy efficiency. In total , some ten diffusers were rated, and it is the opinion of staff and the designers that a sole source purchase agreement with Wyss for diffusers would best serve the Districts' needs. Recommendation: Staff and the designers, John Carollo, are recommending that authority be granted to negotiate for the sole source purchase of Wyss diffusers. Staff Report July 18, 1990 Page Four Purchase of these parts will be as inventory supplies and not through a construction project. The estimated equipment cost is $1.9 million. Attached is a report from the consultant, Exhibit No. 3, dated June 13, 1990, which discusses in some detail the diffuser options. 3. SECONDARY TREATMENT EXPANSION AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-42-2 Sludge Collectors This project will expand the capacity of the existing 75 mgd secondary treatment plant to 90 mgd, or higher. Proposed is the construction of a new effluent channel , scum channel, launders and weirs. The length of the secondary clarifiers will be extended from 175 to 225 feet. The existing sludge collectors will be replaced with longer sludge collectors. The Directors may recall that about seven years ago, metallic chains and sprockets were severely corroded at this site by the influence of the pure oxygen used in the activated sludge process. The Directors authorized the installation of Budd non-metallic collectors after a successful sole source prepurchase and installation agreement was approved. Our operating and maintenance experience has established that using plastic chain for the collector mechanisms is the most superior and cost effective system. There are now several manufacturers who make quality non-metallic chain. However, few have a history of providing equipment for this length of clarifier. Budd offers one very distinct advantage over the other systems. That advantage is a proprietary stub shaft. The lengthening of the clarifiers precludes the use of a full-width shaft (from basin wall to basin wall) in that there will be no access for normal removal of the shaft. Special high-priced cranes would have to be rented each time maintenance was required. With the Budd stub shaft, extensive structural modifications would be avoided as well as crane rentals. Recommendation: The Consultant, John Carollo Engineers, and staff therefore recommend that the Directors authorize negotiations with Budd to supply the new drive systems. The estimated cost is about $1,600,000. Attached is a letter report, Exhibit No. 4, from the consultant. 4. PROGRAMMABLE LOGIC CONTROLLERS (PLCs) AND COMPUTER SUPPLIERS. JOBS NOS. P2-44 AND J-23-2 Currently the Districts utilize some 23 PLCs for automated control of various processes to operate and monitor treatment plant activities. Staff Report July 18, 1990 Page Five Under design are two projects which will install new computer systems at each treatment plant. Job No. J-23-2, Plant 1 Control Center Instrumentation, installs new computer equipment and instrumentation within a new control center/operations building under design by others. At Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-44 replaces the existing computer system. It is intended that the equipment at each plant be identical and supplied by the same manufacturer and meet the recommendations of the 1989 Master Plan which calls for a distributed computer control/monitoring system. The designer, EMA Inc. of Tucson, Arizona, has recommended that the Districts limit their computer selection to a prequalified list of vendors which they feel will best meet the Districts' needs for supplying necessary equipment. Recommendation: ERA reviewed suppliers that could provide an interface to the existing Ocean Outfall Booster Station, the interface to the existing Modocom Programmable Logic Controllers, operator workstations, and data highway requirements. Based on the results of the survey, the following firms are recommended: Bailey Controls Allen Bradley Fischer 8 Porter Johnson/Yokogawa Westinghouse The estimated cost of the equipment is $3,000,000. Attached is a March 28 letter, Exhibit 5, and a May 1990 Supplier Evaluation. 5. FUTURE ACTIONS The results of the two negotiated sole source contracts will be returned to the Boards for consideration. Prequalified vendors for the three other projects will be included in the Specifications for each job and an "or equal' will not be allowed. EXHIBIT 1 Attention: Mr.•ram Dawes Mr.Jim Harris n JOHN CAROLLO u JE GINEERS RIOENIKK LWWIR Cp6EICG aLxtt nxgG NylyG 9R11 BFANMO,NO.G • TICaON K yx OIE00,G GNFAyIEI➢,G naC o. N7O.G•• L05.WUF1E9,G MFSxO.G July 10, 1990 F3340A.1F Mr. J.Wayne Sylvester, General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley. CA 92728-8127 Subject: P2-42.1 Electrification of Pump Drives at Wastewater Plant No. 2 Prequalificatlon of Major Pumps Transmitted herewith are eight (8) copies of the summary report on our evaluation of major pumps to be prequaltied for the electrification project at Plant No. 2. It is recommended that the major equipment (pump-drive package) for the protect be procured through a conventional construction contract with prequaliflcation of both pumps and drives. Major pump manufacturers such as Fairbanks-Morse,Allis Chalmers, Patterson and Goulds, will be named as acceptable prequaLBed pump manufacturers. The words"or equal"would not be used. Evaluation of major drive are discussed in a separate memorandum "Evaluation of Variable Frequency Drives" and will be forwarded as a separate package. We will be pleased to discuss this memo with you at your convenience. Very truly yours. JOHN OLLO ENGINE G.Wt�� OWMIC Enclosures .`� Exhibit 1 - Sheet 1 of 7 3100 S. Harbor BiNd., Suite 200 Santa Ana,California 927N (714) 54 QOD FAX (714) 540-4349 County Santtotlon Districts of Orange County Electrification of Pump Drives at Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 2 (P2-42-1) Procurement of Major Pumps John Corolla Engineers July 1990 Exhibit t -Sheet 2 of 7 PROCUREMENT OF MAJOR PUMPS INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND To be able to meet SCAQMD permit requirements after start-up of the Central Generation Station(CGS), existing engine drrie s need to be replaced with electric drives, as recommended in the 1989 Master Plan Report. In February 1990,John Camllo Engineers (JCE) started the final design of the electrification project to convert engine drives to electric drives. The types and sizes of new drives have been presented in Design Memorandum No. 18, titled "Electrification Analysis at Plant No. 2." Along with the conversion of the existing engine drives, all Headworks B pumps and electric motors need to be replaced as stated In the 1989 Master Plan. Furthermore, in February and June 1990 design meetings, Districts' Staff decided to replace six pumps in Headworks C. due to the poor conditions of existing pumps. This report is prepared to present the details of major pumps procurement. Included is a description of this equipment, design criteria and recommendations. Procurement of major drives are discussed in the separate memorandum"Evaluation of Variable Frequency Drtves." RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the evaluation of pumps it is recommended that: 1. The major equipment (pump-drive package) for the electrification project be procured through conventional construction contract with prequalification. 2. Fairbanks-Morse, Allis Chalmers. Patterson and Goulds be named as acceptable prequalified manufacturers for pumps in the project specifications. DESCRIPTION OF PUMPS The pumps for this project will be vertical, dry pit mixed flow type designed for 48 mild at 35 feet total dynamic head C1134 for Headworks C and 40 mgd at 40 feet TDH for Headworks B pumps. The maximum pump speed is limited to 360 rpm. The motor horsepower will range between 300 and 400 hp. A total of 10 pumps in Headworks C and B are required as follows: - 1 Exhibit 1 -Sheet 3 of 7 eawweex�etm+em�om®aa+� PUMPS AND DRIVES DESIGN CR1TEIUA . Pump Maximum Minimum Speed Control �a.✓ Capacity Pump Speed Drive Pump Constant(CSD) Equipment Location MGD TDH RPM HP RPM Efficiency Varlable(WD) MSP No. 1 Headworks C 48 35 350 400 360 86 CSD MSP No. 3 Headworks C 48 35 350 400 360 86 CSD MSP No. 5 Headworks C 48 35 350 400 360 86 CSD MSP No. 6 Headworks C 48 35 350 400 360 86 VFD MSP No. 7 Headworks C 48 35 350 400 360 Be CSD MSP No. 8 Headworks C 48 35 350 400 360 86 VFD MSP No. 9 Headworks B 40 40 390 350 400 Be VFD MSP No. 10 Headworks B 40 40 390 350 400 as VFD MSP No. 11 Headworks B 40 40 390 350 400 86 CSD MSP No. 12 Headworks 3 40 40 390 350 400 86 CSD The maximum speed criteria for large pumps of this type has been limited to 350 RPM on most recent Districts projects. Because of physical limitation of the Headworks "B" equipment hatch, slightly higher pump speed of 390 RPM will be allowed to obtain smaller pumps which would fit into the equipment hatch. The minimum pump efficiency for all District's current Headworks pumps is 86 percent or • higher. Each percent of pump efficiency is worth approximately$9,900 annually. Excluding the Ocean Outfall Booster Station(OOHS) pumps,these 10 pumps will represent the bulk of the critical pumping system equipment at Plant No. 2. These pumps are critical for maintaining a high pumping reliability at Plant No. 2. PROCUREMENT METHODS Three procurement methods were considered: 1) a conventional construction contract, 2) a conventional construction contract with prequaliflcatiom and 3) a prepurchase contract. These pumps must be built to the highest reliability standards and the highest efficiency available because failure of any part of the system could lead to loss of pumping capacity, it is desirable to get top quality, highly reliable pumps for this facility. By using conventional construction procurement, the best equipment cannot be guaranteed. Prepurchase of equipment would allow control over equipment selection but has disadvantages pertsinin to administration of two contracts and associated higher potential of change orders during construction. A conventional construction contract with prequalffication of equipment would allow control over equipment selection without the disadvantages of prepurchase method. Therefore, it was recommended that acceptable major equipment manufacturers be prequalifled for this project. This recommendation has been accepted and the Districts have decided to proceed with prequalitication of major equipment. 2 Exhibit 1 -Sheet 4 of 7 ACCEPTABLE EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURERS To meet the critical reliabilityrequirement of the elect electrification protect It 1s Important that the _ major pumps be purchased only from reputable manufacturers who have successful, proven field experience. Equipment and experience of various pumps were evaluated to help in selecting the acceptable manufacturers. Pumps Equipment from five pump manufacturers was evaluated Including Allis Chalmers, Fairbanks- Morse, Goulds, Worthington, and Patterson. Table 1 summarizes the comparison among Fairbank Morse, Allis Chalmers and Goulds. The following are our observations and the conclusions from our evaluation: 1. Allis Chalmers and Fairbanks-Morse have proven experience with the size of the pumps needed for this facility and in similar applications. The Districts have had good experience with their pumps in the past. 2. Goulds have proven experience with the size of the pumps needed for this project and in stmllsr application. However, their pumps Model 175 MFD for Headworks B have a very low efficiency(75 percent) and their next larger pump Model ECD 3OX36 can not fit through the existing equipment hatch. 3. Patterson has a limited experience with dry-pit vertical pumps in similar applications. Patterson pumps are able to meet ma�mum speed requirements for Headworks C pumps and efficiency requirements for the Headworks B pumps. 4. Worthington pumps have experience with the size of the pump needed for this facility and in similar applications, however, the Districts have had bad experience with these pumps due to possible poor quality and design. Pumps No. 1 and No. 3 In Headworks C had a very short wearing ring life. The Districts had to change wearing rings on the average every 10,000 hours of operation. This is not acceptable for this type and size of pumps (see attached Table n Maintenance Record Sheet). 3 Exhibit 1 -Sheet 5 of 7 P199UAIFpe Electr10u11mio01mP�va Table 1 CSDOC Electrification of pump Driven at Wastewater Treatment Plant No.2 Headworks C and B Preliminary Pomp Selection County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Headworks C 40 mad at 35' Headworks B 40 mad at 40' Manufacturer Allis-Chahar Fakbank-Morse Goulds Allis-Chahar Falrbank-Morse Goulds Model N3YV 5711 NSYV 5711 Suction x Disch. 36 x 30 36 x 36 175MGD ECD 30 x 30 36 x 30 36 x 30 ECD 36 x 36 SO x 36 30 x 36 Speed 360 320 325 290 390 350 390 290 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------_-__.____"""------""-------------------------------- Motor HP 400 350 400 400 350 400 350 400 Efficiency 87% 86% 86% 8646 8696 87% 8696 86% --------------------------------------------------_-----------------.----------------------------------_-------------------_----------_-------_____________ Pump Dimension <84"x Se<84"x 84" 89"x 78" 125"x 114" ..................___________---------------------------------------------____...._..................................................___...____...._........ Pump Room 102"x 93" 93"x 84" Hatch Opening ur m rn 0 v Table II Maintenance Record of Existing Worthington Pumps (Two pumps were installed in January 1985 at Headworks C) County Sanitation Dlstrtcts of Orange County Date Hours Map No. 1 MSP No. 3 3-11-87 9,030 Replaced Wear Ring. 1-28-88 20,826 Inspected and found wear ring missing. 2-13-88 20.873 Replaced impeller wear Replaced wear ring. ring. 1-18-89 23,455 Replaced impeller wear ring. Could not get tetlon lantern ring out. Installed 2 rings instead. 5 Exhibit 1 -Sheet 7 of 7 EXHIBIT 2 Attention: Mr,Tom Dawes Mr.Jim Harris JOHN CAROLLO J ENGINEERS PNOExULK VMWWCREERG EMWALNF.G As. I6KI4G —j' MN9EPNRROWO.G w60N.K FnEENOGGG• LM A� s.I SA[RMIFNi[I,G ELPASO.0 July 18, 1990 F3340AAF Mr.J.Wayne Sylvester. General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Boa 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Subject: P2-42-1 Electrification of Pump Drives at Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 2 Evaluation of Variable Frequency Dries We are transmitting herewith eight(8) copies of a summary report on our evaluation of variable frequency drives (VFDs) based on our recent survey to determine manufacturers to be prequalified for the electrification project at Plant No. 2. The unique circumstances that make prequalificanon desirable are summarized in the report, and result primarily from the size and low speed of the drive motors together with the severe duty imposed upon the drives by the critical loads served. Survey methodology Is described in the report and Included the soliciting of technical data from manufacturers and a survey of users of the equipment of each manufacturer. You will note that eight manufacturers were included in the survey and all but one of these have been recommended for prequallficatlon. This high achievement of acceptance Is believed to result from the +0*++9 fl mnr improvement In VFD technology in recent years. We will be pleased to discuss this survey and its findings with you at your comenience. Very truly yours, JOHN /'I•LO ENGINEE G. W811am Knopf GWK:IC Enclosure: Summary Report (8 copies) \� Exhibit 2-Sheet 1 of 14 31M S0M MFs0R BOULEVARD.SURE HID B A Mk C UFORN 927M (714)540J300 F"1714)5404 County Sanitation DWcts Of Orange County Electrification of Pump Drives at Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 2 (P2-42-1) Evaluation of Variable Frequency Drives I I John Carollo Engineers July 1990 rjoHN CARDLLO J IENGINEERS �x0lM:4 WyMR @EExU `` a.xn c.• a.a.�Exro.c. a.xrnruanwu a uewn u a.naEm a a..Eiwaao c. ' raw..C. Exhibit 2-sheet 2 of 14 EVALUATION OF VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVES GENERAL The Electrification of Pump Doves at Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-42-1) requires a total of 10 new variable frequency drives (VFD), 16 new soft start constant speed controllers ISSCS). and 16 new drive motors each ranging in size from 350 to 401)HP. The new drive systems will replace existing internal combustion engine drives for pumps that are critical for maim +mne a high pumping reliability at Plant No. 2. VFD's are necessary to control pump speed to vary hydraulic output of the pump. This control function was previously accomplished with the engine throttle. Soft start constant speed (SSCS) controllers are required for pump drive motors where speed variation is not necessary but controlled acceleration and deceleration of the pump when starting and stopping is necessary and when to prevent hydraulic surges and damage piping. Thew units will also be installed as bypass devices for motors equipped with VFD's, to allow soft start in the event of VFD failure. The purpose and goal of this survey has been to investigate the design characteristics and operating experience with drives available from the major manufacturers of this equipment, and from this investigation, arrive at a judgement to specify manufacturers whose equipment will ensure reliable service for these vital loads. Due to similarity in design, it has been judged that the manufacturers that are qualified to provide VFD's will also be qualified to provide soft start controllers. SUBMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Based on our overall analysis. we recommend that all the surveyed manufacturers be prequalifted with the exception of the Emerson Electric Company. We would not qualify Emerson for the following reasons: 1. Adverse interview with a user of two 350 Hp drives in which it was stated that the drives 'were virtually rebuilt'by another fabricator/supplier of competitive drives. 2. Unsatisfactory experience with John Cwollo Engineers on a current project relating to specification compliance and delivery performance. 3. Scored one (1) o{possible ten(10) on the technical and manufacturing features portion of the survey. 1 Exhibit 2-Sheet 3 of 14 p99CUA1P.FeP^n 6tduae®aNVAWa1�o SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS AND PREQUALIFYING The benefit of pcequalltying manufacturers of VFD equipment results from the following unique \"r circumstances for the proposed CSDOC installation: 1. When motors, and especially these special low speed motors, are supplied power from VFD's, they are subject to additional thermal stress that results from currents due to the distorted wave form of the power Input to them. Further, their heavy starting requirements Impose greater demands on the VFD's than more conventionally rated Installations, 2. The VFD's, In addition to supplying the starting current required by the motors, must have their output capability coordinated with the torque requirements of the motors and pumps throughout the speed range and must also provide high operating efficiency at acceptable power factor. Cooling of the VFD itself is a vital concern and It is planned to require cooling redundancy beyond that normally furnished. 3. All of the power electronic equipped M's and SSCS)must be capable of operating on a common source of supply without Interference between the several units: a condition which can occur. 4. Growth of the market for large variable frequency drives in the past decade has resulted In a rapid advance in the technology and their availability from an increasingly large number of manufacturers. As in other rapidly advancing technologies. the pressure to enter and obtain a share of the market has, at times, resulted In the sale and installation of equipment of uncertain reliability. SURVEY DESCRE TION An equipment survey was developed to evaluate the manufacturers of VFD's. Equipment from eight VFD manufacturers was surveyed. These included Westinghouse, Brown Boveri, Ross • Hill,Toshiba.Allen Bradley, Emerson, General Electric and Louis Allis. The survey consisted of the following elements: (1) prequaliticatlon submittal, (2) telephone interviews of selected users, and (3) CSDOC experience with each manufacturer, if any. The prequal fication submittal process solicited information from each manufacturer using a questionnaire which requested a variety of design and manufacturing data and a representative list of users with similar equipment In operation. The questionnaire used In the survey Is Included in this report as Exhibit A. The data was then tabulated for comparison between all respondents. For each manufacturer, a total of the preferred responses was computed for each technical category. A list of these 10 categories is presented In Table A-1 of Exhibit A. Using a value of one (1) point for a preferred response, the maximum possible score for each manufacturer is ten(10). i1 2 Exhibit 2 -Sheet 4 of 14 PSNOAIP.Pepvt" ^'a�Wp�sa _ Following tabulation of the questionnaire responses. a total of three users of the drives of each manufacturer were interviewed by telephone. An example of the interview questions is included as Exhibit B. An interview which reported favorable operating experience was assigned a value of live (5) points. An unfavorable report was assigned a value of zero (0) points. The maximum possible score from the interviews was therefore 15 points. Finally. Districts' Staff were interviewed to determine the performance of each manufacturer at CSDOC facilities. This included experience with similar equipment and general comments based on the manufacturer's support of equipment in general (not necessarily VFD's or soft start controllers). An experience rating was assigned a value of one (1) to ten(10) points while no experience was assigned zem (0) points. In summary. the overall scoring system is weighted in favor of actual operating experience over specific technical characteristics and physical features. This approach provides a more realistic indication of long-term performance of the equipment. SCREENING PROCESS The previously described scoring method allows a maximum possible score of 35 points. Table 1 summarizes the point scores of the manufacturers surveyed and their rank within the - group. This scoring system was developed to assess the relative merits of each manufacturer's equipment. No attempt was made to identify a minimum acceptable score; instead. overall engineering Judgement was used to determine the preferred manufacturers based on the information received and impressions made during the phone interviews and in the contacts with the mam.fam..ers'representatives themselves. 3 Exhibit 2 -Sheet 5 of 14 i9aaanir.�tw�w�r.yome, _. .. Table 1 Rank and Manufacturer County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 WeWng Allen• ASEA General Magnetek Survey Category Toshiba House Bradley Ross Ha Brom Boved Electric LoulsAllis Emerson Design and Manufacturing a 8 6 10 8 2 3 1 Features (10) User Experience (15) 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 5 CSDOC Experience (10) 9 4 5 0 0 3 0 8 Total 32 27 26 25 23 20 to 14 Percent of Maximum A Possible (35) 91 77 74 71 66 67 51 40 2 a s N N m m m O A R1 IT A COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CONVERSION TO ELECTRIC DRIVES QUALIFICATION DATA FOR VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVES, SOFT START CONTROLLERS AND MOTORS The project specifications will require that the variable frequency drive (VFD) manufacturer supply and coordinate the application of the VFDs, the soft start constant speed (SSCS) controllers and the electric drive motors. It is therefore the responsibility of the VFD manufacturer to submit all of the following data VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVES: 1. Name of manufacturer 2. Inverter technology. i.e..voltage source or current source and load commutated, forced commutated, pulse width modulated, etc. 3. Do electronic modules utilize printed circuit boards with plugs, edge card connectors or hard wired connections? 4. Do electronic circuits incorporate adjustment potentiometers? S. How many circuit boards must function for the rectifier to operate satisfactorily? How many for the Inverter? 6. Are electronic components encapsulated In plastic,metal or ceramic? 'V 1 Exhibit 2-Sheet 7 of 14 ..vasawiram�ew�vwwvvname.. -.. 7. What is the design full load SCRjunction temperature? State the ambient temperature and temperature rise. S. What is the peak voltage across the thyristors under any operating conditions? 9. Describe the cooling system for the rectifier and inverter bridges. Including air filtration. 10. How is factory service available? What is the typical response time? Is factory diagnostic testing via telephone lire possible? 11. In testing the VFD, is it operated at full load current, frequency and voltage simultaneously? 12. How is the efficiency of the VFD determined? Is It based on a constant torque with varying speed or with torque requirement that varies as the square of the speed as for pumps and power at reduced speed varies as the cube of the speed? Provide an example furnishing an efficiency versus speed curve. 13. Does the manufactumr guarantee effcency at various speeds? 2 Exhibft 2 - Sheet 8 of 14 14. Comment on the operation of six VFDs with ratings to 400 hp from a common supply transformer giving specific attention to the following: a. Total harmonic distortion MID) at the primary of the supply transformer. b. Possibility of interference between the several VFDs. 15. Comment on the possibility of interference between the six VFDs and six SSCS controllers if they are all supplied from a common bus. 16. Provide a list of comparable installations, including ratings, type of load and date of installation with name, address and telephone number of person that can be contacted for verification and comments on performance. SOFT STARr CONSTANT SPEED CONTROLLERS: 1. Name of manufacturer 2. Do electronic modules utilize circuit boards with plug, soldered or screw connections? 3 Exhibit 2-Sheet 9 of 14 P99COAIF.OeP^n ZvdwHmoNuPrtq�w __ 3. Do electronic circuits incorporate rotary adjustment potentiometers? 4. What material is used to encapsulate the electronic components? 5. What is the design full load SCR junctton temperature? State the ambient temperature and temperature rise. 6. How is factory service available? What is the typical response time? Is factory diagnostic testing via telephone line possible? 7. Describe the capability for adjusting or programming the rate of acceleration and deceleration in starting and stopping a motor, including the length of time period available. 8. Provide a list of comparable installations, including ratings, type of load and date of installation with name, address and telephone number of person that can be contacted for verlfidatlon and comments on performance. 4 Exhibit 2- Sheet 10 of 14 • vssawiv:n<yone��rv�reyoma ELECTRIC DRIVE MOTORS: 1. Name of manufacturer 2. State the place of manufacture for motors of the ratings Included in this project. 3. What is the recommended Insulation material and treatment for installation in a coastal environment having high humidity and concentrations of corrosive elements, principally H2S? 4. What is the recommended bearing design and lubrication method? 5. Describe typical rotor construction. 6. Describe cooling provisions. 7. State typical efficiencies at 50 percent, 75 percent and full load when onemting on a VFD. 8. Will the manufacturer fabricate a specially designed base for supporting the motor above the pump? �f 5 Exhibit 2- Sheet 11 of 14 nsaaiex�cem�.u®wemymna 9. Does the manufacturer have similar motors in service with VFDs and SSCS controllers? 10. Provide a list of comparable installations, including ratings, type of load and date of installation with name, address and telephone number of person that can be contacted for verffication and comments an performance. 6 Exhibit 2- Sheet 12 of 14 F9.WMIF:Ptµrt Eviluellm�nlVeelRegD,tu� Table No.AA preferred Respoases to VFD&pdpmeat$nesttonnalre County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Item No. Preferred Response 3 Modules with hard wired connections 4 No potentiometers 5 No more than four circuit boards (including converter and inverter) 6 Metal and ceramic preferred 7 Maxim=SCRjunction temperature 1000C 8 Maximum 1,100 volts 10 Service available via telephone modem 13 Efficiency guaranteed 14 No interference 15 No interference 7 Exhibtt 2-Sheet 13 of 14 f99iM1P.Peput Evalumlm�oNmYregD�lvo E13111T H PREOUALIFICATION SURVEY TELEPHONE INTERVIEW Manufacturer: Date of Contact: Name of Reference &Contact: Phone No.: HP & Voltage: Type of Inverter: No. of Units: Date In Service: Environment: Extended Outages: No. & Length: Cause: Short Tenn Outages: Frequency&Cause: Field Service: From Where: Response Time: Repair Time: Any specific weaknesses of drive? Any changes you would recommend? Would you purchase again? 8 Exhibit 2- Sheet 14 of 14 nsaaa�rx�.crod�eu�arvar�..gon.. EXHIBIT 3 Attention: Mr.Tom Dawes Mr. Jim Harris JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS M PNOENIX.P3 •• WPWUT CREEK.CA ,S/ SNNTAANA.fA VISPW.CA 5/NBERNARDINO.CA • TUCBON,K ` BAN OIEGO,G W.ERBFIELD,LA Yy FRESNO,CA LOSANGEL£S.CA SACRAMENTO.CA EL PAW.TX June 13, 1990 F334OAl Mr. J.Wayne Sylvester County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue- Plant 1 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Subject: P1-36 Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1 Prepurchase of Parkson Corporation's Wyss Aeration Diffusers The existing aeration basins at Plant No. 1 were constructed in 1973 and have a rated capacity of 46 million gallons per day(MOD). In 1985, the existing course bubble diffuser system in the aeration basins was replaced with approximately 13,000 Wyss medium bubble diffusers. The Wyss diffusers offered increased oxygen transfer efficiency and allowed the Districts to treat the same amount of wastewater using less energy. These diffusers have performed well and have �..i required very little maintenance. The P1-36 project will expand the secondary treatment capacity of Plant No. 1 from 46 MOD to 75-80 MGD average daily Dow. To accomplish this expansion, the existing aeration basins will be modified to increase the aeration capacity. Additional diffusers will be added to each aeration basin to provide sufficient air to treat the Increased flows. The blowers will also be converted from engine-driven to electric motor driven units. A detailed review of diffusers has been made to select a diffuser system for expansion of the existing aeration system. This review Indicates that it would be In the Districts best Interest to install Wyss diffusers to match the existing system for the following reasons: 1. Wyss diffusers are proven to this application, with low risk of failure. This is a significant feature due to the large number of diffusers required L 44.000). 2. Use of Wyss diffusers would allow the Districts to salvage and refurbish the approximately 13,000 existing Wyss diffusers at a overall cost savings. 3. Design of the aeration system could be optimized to accommodate a known supplier. 4. Wyss diffusers have demonstrated low maintenance cost and energy efficiency. Fxhibk 3-Sheet 1 of 4 3100 SOUTH HARBOR BOULEVARD.SUITE 200 SANTA ANA.CALIFORNIA 92704 (714)SQ-43W FAX 1714)540..4349 Mr. J. Wayne Sylvester County Sanitation Districts of Orange County June 13, 1990 Page 2 It Is suggested that Wyss diffusers be obtained by direct purchase from Parkson Corporation, manufacturer of the Wyss diffuser. The following information presents the basis for this recommendation. DIFFUSER OPTIONS A wide variety of diffusers are available on the marketplace today. A listing of the known diffuser manufactures is included in Table 1. Factors involved in selecting a diffuser for the project Include oxygen transfer efficiency, materials of construction, maintenance requirements, pressure lose through the diffuser, and experience. Parkson manufactures an aeration panel which offers high oxygen transfer efficiency. This system was not given consideration due to limited operating experience. Likewise, ceramic diffusers, such as the Norton dome diffuser, were not considered due to high maintenance requirements, labor Intensive cleaning which is periodically required and high capitol cost of an air filtering system. A number of membrane diffusers, including the Wyss diffuser, are available. There are two main types, a disk, and a tube. Each type utilizes a perforated membrane which diffuses air into the water. Differences between the various membrane diffusers include: a.) the membrane material b.) the method used to attach the diffuser to the air piping, c.) the method used to prevent baclmow of water into the header system, d.) the configuration of the diffuser body e.) experience in large wastewater treatment plants Parkson's Wyss diffuser has the longest and widest U.S. experience record of all the membrane diffuser manufacturers. CSDOC has over 13,000 WYSS membrane diffusers which have been In service for over sic years. Districts staff have learned during the recent capacity testing program that the oxygen transfer efficiency of these diffusers exceeds manufacturer's guarantees. For the P1-36 Project, approximately 44,000 additional diffusers would be purchased and installed to provide adequate aeration capacity. If aeration diffusers by other manufacturers are accepted for Installation in the P1-36 project, additional diffusers would need to be purchased as spare parts in addition to the installed diffusers. Typically ten percent of the total number of diffusers or one additional basin worth of diffusers would be purchased for spare parts. If Wyss diffusers are used for the P1-36 project, the 13,000 existing Wyss diffusers could be removed and refurbished. The equivalent of three basins of spare diffuser P999MI:letlm Mpawmmf�avn Wo�.Am�tlon Exhibit 3 -Sheet 2 of 4 Mr. J. Wayne Sylvester County Sanitation Districts of Orange County June 13, 1990 - Page 3 bodies would be available fmm salvaged diffusers (30%). A competing diffuser system would have to be 25 to 30 percent less expensive before any advantage to the Districts could be realized. Our conclusion is that it is in the Districts best interest to continue with the use of the Wyss system. We are available to discuss this issue in mom detail at your convenience. In the meantime, if you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS 4�' Maryrry Lee M 3.:,,h ZI: Tom Woodruff F994 W.I:IeYc MpauemmlPmMolMftlm Exhibit 3 -Sheet 3 of 4 Table 4.1 Comparison of Aeration Dlffaser Alternatives ka County Sanitation Districts of Orange County S Ycan of No.of U'S.Plant Ycua of Ycw of Sundartl Dufuacr Ckan Wala OlRueer DlRuser Dllfuaer U.S. a. U.S. F.1gn Membrane Membralw Ilcadlova re 1 SOLE Manufaciurtr Type Config. hanallau. mgd Experience Exp d.. Material Wananly xfin.In. Brant cammmM Wyaa Flu A-'Nbe Membrane Tbbe 14 1-46 to 0 IYL`lll 515) 5 24.4 Curmnlly Was urd at CSUOC Mant No. 1. g Ent FI.Ir Wrubrme Tbbe 5 n/a121 cl Ida EPUM131 I16) 10 26o I.ImI1W U.S.Opmua, E PWarce Scbrclb[rAw0ca Menlbrma Tbbe 20 3.5 3 W. EI'OM 3(6) n/e N.0 I.Im11W U.S.OpersUng Expen.occ kmlux TIM Mcmbrmlc 'Nbc 8 W. c1 n/a Nca,o.. 31h1 n/a 20.0 LIm11W U.S.Opna0ng Expulcncc SONlaSe Membrmm Ulan g 1-20 2 n/a EPDM 3161 4 26.0 LImI1W U.S.Op Urlg Expalcrcc RaWlsu Rochx Membmnc Dlse IE Ia 3 n/a EPDM 1 6 24.1 UsW mostly to amall Indualrlal Appllra0ona Elmco Elastox D Wrnbun. DI. 20 1 12 3 n/a MUM 3161 4 25.0 Ll nlltd U.S.UWattly( L+aputcncc Lnvina IFU Mcmbrunc Disc 20 n/a n/a u/o EPUM n/u 8 24.7 Porkaon Aeratlan Membrane feral 2 38 ul g Ilomogcncnua 1015) 2](4) 45.8 High SOME.n.Ral U.S. m pmlcl Tlcrmoplasuc OpneUng Exadancc U Narmn Dome [:erunik Dane .20 WMa lWngc >IO CIO -- -- n/e 30.o Requlro Fnq l rs � Mulninurae N m III polyvinyl-Ch1urlJc A 12) Not Avegable O 13) Elhykne-Wopylene A (4) Iieadlwa al l nefm per of of nncl (5) 1'mrnlcd WanmJyql _ Can Incrcnac l0 5 ycara EXHIBIT 4 Attention Mr. Tom Dawes Mr. Jim Harris r JOHN CAROLLO J ENGINEERS M CARTA% K WAWU CREER.CA SANTA ANAU VIEAL0.0 SANEERNAROINO.CA • TUCSON.K SANDIEGOCA SANERSFIELD,U J SACRAMENTO.CA L- CA PAW.U July 18, 1990 F3340A1E Mr. J.Wayne Sylvester County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Subject: P2.42-2 Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2 Prepurchase of Budd Sludge Collectors The Secondary Treatment Expansion Project at Treatment Plant No. 2 (Project P2-42.2) calls for the existing secondary clarifiers to be extended from 175 feet in length to 225 feet in length. This will increase the rated capacity of the clarifiers from 75 million gallons per day (MGD) to 90 MOD. Modifications to the existing clarifiers to Increase their length will Include construction of a new effluent channel, a new scum channel and additional launders and weirs. In addition, the existing sludge collectors must be removed and replaced with longer sludge collectors. CSDOC now uses non-metallic sludge collectors in all rectangular primary and secondary clarifiers at both Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2. This is due in part to the poor experience with the metallic collectors which were originally installed in the Plant No. 2 secondary clarifiers. Budd non-metallic collectors were purchased on a test basis and Installed in the Plant No. 2 secondaries. Their successful performance encouraged the Districts to install Budd sludge collectors in other clarifiers at the Plants. The Districts have approximately seven years of successful operating history with the Budd equipment. A detailed review of other non-metallic sludge collectors which are currently available has been made and it appears that prepurchase of sludge collectors as manufactured by Budd for the P2-42-2 Project is the best approach. The basis for this recommendation follows. Sludge collectors for rectangular primary or secondary clarifiers consist of non-metallic chain, flights and sprockets. A section showing the components of a clarifier and sludge collector is shown in Figure 1. Non-metallic components offer several advantages over metallic systems. Non-metallic chain Is lighter, reducing the wear and drag on the drives. It does not corrode and is easier to install and maintain. Several manufacturers currently supply the non-metallic chain. These are: Budd, Env&= NRG, and Jeffery. Exhibh 4-Sheet 1 Of 3 3100 SOUTH HARBOR BOULEVARD.SUITE 200 SANTA ANA.CALIFORNIA 927N (714)540-4300 .FAx 0141540-44349 Mr.J.Wayne Sylvester County Sanitation Districts - , of Orange County .. aluly'Is. 1990 .. _ .Page 2 _. Each manufacturer was evaluated for installation in the secondary clarifiers at Plant No. 2. This evaluation included a review of equipment specifications, Installation lists and a detailed telephone survey of existing installations with special emphasis on experience in clarifiers greater than 200 feet in length. Each of the listed manufacturers appears to provide a satisfactory product which could work in the P2-42-2 application. However, the Budd system offers distinct advantages over the other manufacturers' system. This advantage is significant enough to warrant that the District prepurchase the Budd equipment on a sole-source basis. The Budd system uses a "stub shaft," which is a proprietary design. The alternate to a stub shaft is a shaft which extends the full width of the collector(20 feet). Figure 1 shows both a stub shaft and a full width shaft. The height of the existing basins and the location of the return shaft in the clarifiers would result in significant maintenance problems if full width shafts are used. Figure 1 shows the location of the return shaft in relation to the access road adjacent to the clarifier. If full width shafts are used, a special crane would be required and would need to be rented each time the shaft was removed from the basin for maintenance. Additional construction costs would also result if crane access is provided. The Budd stub shaft could be removed using the Districts existing mini-crane. No structural modifications for access would be required. Both construction cost and maintenance cost would be less than If full width shafts are used. An additional advantage to the Budd system is that the stub shaft, Including the bearings, is all non-metallic. Non-metallic bearings have the advantage of requiring no external lubrication. This analysis indicates that it would be in the Districts best interest to prepurchase the Budd sludge collectors for installation on the P2-42-2 project. We are available to discuss the recommended prepurchase agreement in more detail at the Districts convenience. In the meantime, if you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours. JOHN CAROLI.O ENGINEERS Mary C. Lee / ,MCL/pr nSaan�F,: ttR wad Sn,d CaUttw Exhibit 4- Sheet 2 of 3 ACCESS LENOTH±951L INTERMEDIATE SHAFT SCUM CHANNEL y � I -I EFFLUENT LAUNDER EFFLUENT CHANNEL SLUDGE COLLECTOR CROSS COLLECTOR LONGITUDINAL SECTION I a Ia CSDOC P2-42 FULL-WIDTH SHAFT STUB SHAFT SECONDARY CLARIFIERS SECTION CROSS SECTION @ INTERMEDIATE SHAFT FIGURE 1 - - - - JOIIN Cq RNIIO lNRINfIRB �:- EXHIBIT 5 ENGINEERING SOFTWARE CONSULTING 4400East Broodway Suite304 Tucson,AZ85T1 602/881-2988 Pox602/881-3722 March 28, 1990 _ Mr.Jim Harris Project Manager Orange County Sanitation Districts m APR Q Z 1990 ro P.O.Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Ott Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 S' Subject: 1-23-1, P2-44 Computer System Procurement E ti Dear Jim: We have serious concerns regarding the bidding process as currently planned by the Districts for the Plant 1 and Plant 2 computer systems. We believe that bidding these projects without vendor prequalification or preselection is not in the best interest of the Districts. Originally,EMA recommended vendor prequalification for these projects based on vendor proposals to be submitted in response to the specifications. Only prequalified vendors would be allowed to submit bids. The Districts elected to not follow this procedure. We were then directed by the Districts to develop a"preselected list"of bidders,based on the predesign criteria developed by the Districts and EMA We sent a request for information to vendors who could bid on this type of project,evaluated their responses, and developed a recommended list of four suppliers to submit bids. Subsequently,we have been advised by the Districts that the preselection procedure cannot be implemented and that the specifications would be"opened up"to allow anyone to bid. The contract would then be awarded to the low bidder. By following this procedure, the vendor's ability to meet the specifications would not be known until submittals were reviewed. Submittal review will not be completed until the project has been under contract for as long as sic months. To terminate the contract at this point, due to the vendor not meeting specifications, could require legal action. Until a resolution could be reached the Districts would be without a monitoring and control system at Plant 1. Also, the Districts would incur significant expense due to reinitiation of the procurement process,additional engineering services, and potential legal fees. In years past,computer systems were procured strictly via low bid,with no prequalification or preselection. The consequences were that many of these systems did not meet the owner's expectations, never worked at all, and/or ended up in litigation. It was as a direct result of these problems that the EPA encouraged and eventually developed a procedure for prequalification of computer system vendors on federally funded wastewater projects. EMA has been a promoter of vendor prequalification for many years. We prequalify vendors on almost every project we design. For your project,we felt that the preselection procedure was a reasonable compromise that would work. 10M30/1/3-2/-90 Minneapolis-St. Paul Philadelphia Tuaon Odando Exhibit 5 -Sheet 1 of 6 Prequalification, or preselection,allows the Districts and EMA to confirm a vendor's capability to meet the specifications and perform successfully prior to submitting bids. The submittals are then used to review the vendor's detailed system design. We have,in fact, already completed preselection and have recommended four qualified vendors. We strongly recommend that the Districts reconsider their position and reinstate the preselection procedure. This will enhance the hlceBood that your goals will be met and that potentially serious implementation problems will be avoided We are willing to meet with the Districts at anytime to further disco this issue. Very truly yours, EMA Services,Inc. Rdd W. raupmann,PTE Vice President RWG/jec cc i Joe Hirte/EMA Jim Nason/EMA File 5108.030-22 tastaw/t/s.n-ss _Exhibit 5 -Sheet 2 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY PLANT Nos. 1 & 2 CONTROL SYSTEM SUPPLIER EVALUATION Prepared far. {5 IT"0I d cC Prepared by SERVICES, INC. May 1990 Exhibit 5 - Sheet 3 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS CONTROL SYSTEM SUPPLIER EVALUATION A. Purpose — EMA identified suppliers capable of supplying a control systems for Plants No. 1 and No.2. These firms were selected on the basis of having successfully supplied similar systems in the past. A Request for Information (RFI) was sent to each of these suppliers. The RFI's were evaluated to identify the suppliers best able to provide a control system meeting the specific needs of the Districts. Some of these needs are defined below and include; interface to the existing Outfall Booster Station, interface to the existing Modicon Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs), operator work stations, and data highway requirements. (For future details, refer to the Predesign Report for this project, dated Setpember, 1989). B. Potential Suppliers The following firms were identified as potential suppliers. RFI's were sent to each firm. 1. Bristol Babcock 2. Teledyne/Control Applications 3. Trans-Dyn Controls 4. Fisher& Porter 5. Turbitrol 6. Johnson Yokogawa Corp. 7. Bailey Controls 8. Allen-Bradley 9. Valmet Automation All of the firms responded to the RFI. C. General Analysis of System Requirements. 1. Fisher& Porter (F& P) interface. The Ocean Outfall Booster Station control system,which was recently installed,was provided by Fisher and Porter. The new control system at Plant No. 2 must interface to the F&P. The only firm indicating that they would not have difficulty interfacing to the existing Fisher& Porter system was F& P. The responses from the other firms fell into two categories. They either stated that they needed more information about the protocol being used or they would add their hardware in parallel with the existing F& P system. Discussion with Fisher and Porter indicated that they consider their protocol proprietary and will not make it available for general use by other suppliers. 2. Existing programmable controller(MODICON) interface. Most of the firms addressed interface to the existing Modicon equipment in a similar manner. They would, in general,connect several of the Modicons together 1(1630.74/1/SS90 Exhibit 5 -Sheet 4 of 6 using the data highway protocol developed by Modicon, and then interface the data highway to their equipment. 3. Operator Stations The operator stations proposed were either. 1) data highway connected VAX or PC based workstations or 2) operator stations directly wired to the central computers as a separate star configuration network. 4. Districts Data Highway Needs In discussions with the Districts staff, one of the basic requirements was a redundant data highway connecting the new data acquisition equipment (central computers and satellite stations). Fiber optics for both types of highways was highly desirable, due to the problem of induced voltage and noise at both plants. 5. The SCADA Approach EMA believes that the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) type approach could impair the required screen update time of 2 seconds during high data periods such as plant upsets. The SCADA approach generally relies an a polling scheme to interrogate the remote units and report by exception (ie. data is transmitted only for items which have changed since the last poll). D. Supplier Analysis. Specifics related to each firm. 1. Bristol Babcock: Bristol indicated that they would not have any problem providing the system as identified in the Predesign Report. However,Bristol uses the SCADA approach. 2. Teledyne/Control Application: Teledyne stated that they could provide the system with no major problems. They indicated that they have a gateway to provide translation between the data highway and the existing PLC's. Teledyne, however,has no installed systems similar to that proposed for this project. 3. Trans-Dyn Controls: Trans-Dyn stated that they have a gateway similar to that identified in the Predesign Report. Their data rate on the data highway is 9.6 Kbps; relatively slow by current standards,which could impact the screen update rates. 4. Fisher& Porter(F&P): They do not have any problems with interface. They would run Modbus to their Distributed Control Units(DCUs) to perform the interface to the existing Modicons. The F& P proposal met the requirements of the RFL iM30-34/1/sa-90 Exhibit 5 -Sheet 5 of 6 5. Turbitrol: Turbitrol proposed using a SCADA approach or, as an alternate, using a sin e Ethernet data highway. With the SCADA approach, they may have trouble with the required screen update rate. The Ethernet approach does not provide a redundant data highway. Turbitrol would supply Square D PLCs as gateways using either approach. 6- Johnson Yokogawa: Johnson either a 500 SCADA system or a 5000 DPC system. The 500 system uses a SCADA approach. The Modicons (new and old)would be connected together using Modbus. Johnson would use a STAR pattern to connect to the operator control stations. The 5000 system is a distributed process controller (DPC) approach and would use Modbus from the existing Modicons to Johnson's remote control stations. The 5000 system proposal met the requirements of the RFI. 7. Bailey: Bailey's proposal met the requirements of the RFI. Their system uses a distributed data base and will interface to the existing Modicon equipment 8. Allen-Bradley: Allen-Bradley would use their pyramid controller and their PLC's. Allen-Bradley PLCs would act as gateways where needed They would use VAX workstations on the data highway. Allen Bradley's proposal met the requirements of the RFI. 9. Valmet Automation's response indicated they did not wish to pursue this project any further. E. Recommendations. It is recommended that the following firms be allowed to pursue this project during the bidding stage because they can best meet all of the Districts needs: 1. Bailey Controls 2. Allen-Bradley 3. Fisher& Porter 4. Johnson Yokogawa 5. Westinghouse 10830.31/1/5S-90 Exhibit 5 -Sheet 6 of 6 • i ii.LL�(l'd _ .IUL.'�„ 6 IyyULPi I E SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE 21 rs .. Dept. - R . J - Court � ..—..�M. ^- JULY 23, 1990 ,Present W. F: RYLAARSDAM Lori Pickrell Hon. __ , Deputy Clerk; none _ Bailiff _ none ,Reporter; and the following proceedings were hod: 59-71-93 BEATRICE RUNT-WESSOH VS. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 60-66-96 BEATRICE BUNT-WESSON VS: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT No appearances. The above matter having been taken under submission on 7-23-90, the Court now makes its ruling as follows: Motion to deny writs of mandate is granted. The Court finds that codification of the discharge limits was not arbitrary, capricious or wholly without evidentiary, support. The Court also finds that substantial evidence supports denial of plaintiff's appeal reguarding limits on the discharge permit. In making this a determination at this time. the Court has refrained from ruling. on n the issue of whether defendant's conduct constitutes an inverse �• condemnation. This issue will be determined after the subsequent hearing. After the hearing on August 6, 1990, the Court will determine: 1. Whether there is evidence which might support a finding that defendant's conduct constituted inverse condemnation. 2. If so, whether such evidence should cause the court to reconsider its above ruling denying the Writ of Mandate. 3. If not, whether Summary Judgment should be granted in favor of defendant and, if not, whether summary adjudication of issues should be granted. (Continued on page 2) Statistical I I. 1. '4. 5. 6. 7. S. 9. 10. II. 12, 13. 14. 15. 16, Code use h ' IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE Dept. 21 Court convened at M._ JULY 23,_ 19 90 ,present W. F. RYLAARSDAM Lori Pickrell Hon. Judge:,_____ , Deputy Clerk: none none Bailiff:.__ __ , Reporter; and the following proceedings were had: 59-71-93 BEATRICE HUNT—WESSON VS. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 60-66-96 BEATRICE HUNT—WESSON VS. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT (Continued from page 1 ) Prevailing party to give notice. ENTERED: 7-23-90 L' oOb9oF ROURKE S TueRsR RUTAN S TUCKER THOMAS L. WOODRUFF DAVID C. LARSEN 701 South Parker St. , Ste. 7000 DARWIN J. KINGHORN Orange, CA. 92668 611 Anton Blvd. , Suite 1400 Costa Mesa, CA. 92626 GIBSON, DUNN 3 CRUTCHER JOEL S. MOSKOWITZ 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA. 90071 CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF MAILING (CCP 1013a) : I certify I affi not a party to this cause, am over 18 and a copy of this document was mailed first class, postage prepaid, in a sealed envelope addressed as shown above. Mailing and execution of this certificate occurred on at Santa Agga, CA. GARY L. GRANVILLE, County Clerk by A U, o g , Deputy. V� i S l alisGcal I I. _ 3 4. 5. G 7. & 9 10. H. 12. 13. 14. 15..116 Code Use �, I I I I — I I I I II— 1 — I 7 RCV W C3000 TECH SERV. i 7-31-90 i 2:52PM i CCITT 034 iA 1 UNIVERSAL CIRCUITS INCORPORATED July 31, 1990 Orenge 0oudty Banitation District Attat Richard W. von Langan PAX No. 714-962-6957 Universal Circuits Incorporated has withdrawn its appeal for Issuance of No. 1 Aeatwater Discharge Permit for 2249 South Yale street, Santa Ana, Callfomis. OBI L C1=23 TTED im—. dJ. B � Ptaa ent �momm 0lfioe W I4I N9240 Fountain Mh . Mnmm1mwd Full,WI 57051 <14.265.0502 FAX 414.255.0233 A-V AJ RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 8, 1990 - 7: 30 P.M. `.J 1/ 4 FUNk 9104 •- JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/1`1/91- PAGE. 1\ 1 n Ri PORT HUNTER AF43 COUNTY_SANI,HAT ION OISTR I HA Qj;_DF ,OPPNQ[-COUNTY .... _. . .__. . P' CLAIMS PAID !7/19%•+M POS7INC TE P7/U9/91 � - -------�-� a APANT_N0. ...... _#YOUNT._.. . _ __.. ... ... DES CA I PTION.....___ "\s 107815 AWWA/WPCF RE.SIPIIALR "GMT. f245.60 REGISTRATION 107816 ACTION DOOR REFAIP CORP. 6 .17,p_'-J,.!--._.-__.-._._....-._ ._-.. --W.OR_RSPAIR_____. IG7810 AIR COL CONSTRUE TOO.. INC. l462$322.85 CONSTRUCTION PAR PI-74-2 1G7818 AIR COLD SUPPLY INC. 3322.85 ELECTRIC PARTS e 307819 AILAO2 INDQ$18J PAL HNC. ._-_--__.__-_..._.___..__--31.29r Q0 ._.__.-.__. _._..__.......BCBQTRIC 107820 ALL INDUSTRIAL VALVES $2.629.41 VALVE 107821 ALPHABA2 $2,279.04 PROPANE 107822 ALLIED SUPPLY CO. 107823 CITY' OF ANAHEIM 3117.914.92 CONSTRUCTION REIMBURSENY 2-26. M.O.12-10-66 107024 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $5.136.64 SEWER "PAIRS DIST 7 + 107P25 ANTXTER + z 107626 ANTELOPE VALLEY EQUIP. S121.78 MOTOR PART 107827 A-PLUS SYSTEMS S4.115.50 NOTICES.& ADS 147828 APPLE ONE fe14y38 TENP09ARY.,In C88 m. . 107829 A09IZO7 A INSTRUMENTD -- -29.813.00 INSTRUMENT --_-- --- IS7830 ASSOCIATE SOILS ENGINEERING 31.893.00 SOIL TESTING N.O.6-14-el? 107931 RAN O PH. AUSTIN 111•35.R'so 207832 8 & T HYDRAULICS $56.49 _MECHANICAL PAWS # 1117033 EC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY. INC. 64R9.91 MECHANICAL PARTS w 07034 BACKSTREET GALLERY f597. 3 _ _FRAMING •1 107835 BANCROFT-WHITNEY CO. - A108130 PUBLICATION 10783E P.U. BAPOTTI AND ASSOC. t2.937.50 CONSTRUCTION SERVECRS PI-34-2.P2-37 107837 SA TER CIEN IPTC 00 73 LAB SUPPLIES _ .-_-_ --__ C $557.62 107R38 B4YLESS STATIONERS 533T.B3 ORRICE 9UPPLI68 107839 MEW ENGINEERING. INC. t6.P6 MECHANICAL PARTS 1078 40 BONNEVILLE EQUIP_, INC. S5iLt¢Q,.,$P_ __CRANE CERTIFICATION__ v y. 10789 BRINOERSON CORP. $1.912,970.70 CONSTRUCTION 1-19-2 7•+ 107042 BROOW INSTRUMENT.DIV. $302.81 !B'1'EN REPAIR 107843 OR OVN .R CALOWELL _...,_-_-_ f9Q 1.A0_SERVICES ____ (� 147843 RROYN & CALDWELL CONSULTING _ 576.433.85 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-35.P2-39.1-19 -4 107845 STEVE BUSALO CONSTRUCTION CO. S267.419.06 CONSTRUCTION 14-1-IB . N 107846 P.P. BURKE INDUSTPIAL CRAP fTV 236.SC CONSTRUC710N J-24 _____.__s_.____._..__-. 177.575.V0 _ N -__ERING SERVICES__-.__._. RES 88-__.—.._. .____... 107848 GUSH .AND TREED 4TE5. INC. t71357.05 ENCINECARE BURS ENT 88-71 )ae 107849 GARY-6. STP EED 3357.J8 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT s. 107849 BY-PRODUCTS 107850 CS COMPANY --- 32.796.�'2 VALVE PARTS - - --_--_- J. 107851 CAL-CLASS FOR PESEARCH. INC. $476.42 LAB SUPPLIES 107P52 _CAL-PAC CHEMICAL CO.. INC. $1 6.90 CHEMICALS •a. 107653 CAL SOUTX CGUISMlN7 CO. --__._.__._ ._..._...... ---- - A517.5C - - _ - ---- --INSTRUMENT UP AIR --- -- - ---------- J•' 107854 CALTROL . INC. $125.0n INSTRUMENT REPAIR •. 107855_ CAL TYPE OFFICE MACHIN_E.S3, INC. $196.94 OFFICE MACHINE -- 107656 --- _ CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION. INC - t731.42 - 'TRUCK REPAIRS _j 107857 JOHN CAPOLLO ENBIHLERS $325,625.35 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-34.P1-36.P2-42.P1-20 e 10785A CASE POWER A EQIlIP"IN7 _ _ _ _ 1261.RR , _ HARDWARE _ • 107859 CF.NTEL COM14UNICpT10N5 SYSTEM 91.949.IB TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATION ,J 307960 CHk TS CERVf LL ONE 63P2.1P MEETING EXPENSE s� vM FUND NO 9119 - JT GIST WORXIRF CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/2719.1 PAGE 2 REPORT PUMPER AP43 I COVNTY SANIIAT_IOP DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY _CLAIRS GAIO +7% 9%9S ...PO S71N6 SATE C 04%9e.__... . . ... _....... ... ...._._........._._._..__.__. , - WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT OESCRIP TION 10786 CHEYPON U.S.A.. INC. $1,356.34 UNLEADED GASOLINE 107862 CHUCK'S ELECTRIC fl 132.34 _ELECTRIC PART r L07F6�-� V AN COTTON FR 06-----------•� - --- -f 968.95 -"''-__._ ._..._ SAFETY SUPPLIES - --- '1 , 107864 COAST FIRE EOUIFMENT S2,J54.65 SAFETY SUPPLIES IUTB65 COLT CH AND SONS 9192,783.35 CON STRU,C'HON_7-IIJ 30 86--6 �OMF .SSOP UIRFb E1Tl RT 0 -FAEff —_.._-..__....... .._. MECHANICAL PARTS 'lu 107067 COMPUSERVE 514.00 COMPUTER SERVICES a 1O786R CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIET. S5,:189.36 __ ELECTRIC PARTS869 _ _ ..___.___ CONTINENTAL H GIN. ,817.I4 ENGINES MING M.0.1-I0-90 I07870 COOPER INDUSTRIES. INC. $6$1,409.00 ENGINES M 0 3-13-87.6-E-BB.J-19A 107872 CORE-R OSION AUTO _ f1,906.00 ___STORAGE TAKES 0 tl MESA SUPPLY f6.69 TRUCE PARTS ---------- --- 1, Y 147873 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $1,299.39 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 107874 CHEMPRO ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $946.11 _CHEMICAL EQIIIPMBNT _ _ __ �,. 107875 CAL"WATER $FPS-Ts- RENTAL EQUIPMENT 107876 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE f205.13 TIRES 107877 TOM DAWES $62.30 • MEETING EXPENSE 1078 8 DESKTOP GRAPHICS I D S16N $102.00 OUTSIDE PRINTING 107879 DEZURIN AND/OR CS CO. l3,744.75 VALVE PARTS a00 107880 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES SM11.75 _PRINTING e ,T IftlaillD.. ..SAL .CON ROC-SERVICE• .INC. 450.00 TESTING SERVICES 107E82 DIY ER SIFTED INSPECTION'c - $834.50 TRUCK PARTS n 107883 DUNK EL ER OS. N pCX ND VING 119141.67 SPACE RENTAL J-19A 7 af- 307689 EMA SERVICES, INC. $23.434.55 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-23-2 S'�a 117885 ENSECO-CRL $1,000.00 OCEAN SAMPLING 197886 EASTMAN. INC. $1.959.24 OFFICE SUPPLIES :V1 107 BEST CORP. - 556,773.00 CONSTRUCTION 2-26-2.2-2 -A 107868 EL. TORU. COMPUTER SOLUTIONS $25.00 OFFICE MACHINE REPAIR 107889 ELECTRO NUMERICS INC.` $1,248.94 _ INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES C1 107890 EDWAND L. ELLIOT. JR. 9961.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES '3 N 107891 ENCHANTER, INC. 34.8 D0.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.3-I4-90 307892 ENGINEERING-SCIENCE 3970.4R ENGINEERING_SERVICES 3-161893 ENGINEERS SALES-SERVICE CO. $299.16 PUMP PARTS 107994 ENIERRA 'INSTRUMENTATION $964.20 TEST EQUIPMENT 107895 FST SAND AND GRAVEL* INC. $588.51 SAND A GRAVEL 0789E JOHN ERN•0. PTURKERNSTE7N P.E. 1079 FARR SALES R SIFVTCE ----- ----�iL2SA,982739.0190 FILTER 107898 FEDERAL EXPRESS COFP. i135.1I AIR SFTRREU C IGTHIT AST FINDER [NUEN ON -PUBLICATION 1 07900 FERRELLGAS $34.43 PROPANE -- D7901 FISCHER R FORTER CO. $50B11.69 CHLORIKATIOR_PAflTB,_-_._ _.. . . 0 !F -- F-- AT 6 VERTICAL COMCM -._._._.._..—.__.__..... .. - ; 1385.5T_ RE _ . ...._.. _._....___ _ CONCTE CUTTING .. J 107903 FLUID COMPONENTS, INC. f15,001.U7 METER 107904 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $13.76 FILM 7905 FOUNTAINVALLEY PAIN}-------- ' — '-'--fK aBo. -'-------- PAINT GUPPLIHB --- J 101906 THE FOXBORO CO. l2012.73 INSTRUMENT PART J„ a w r.. 1 - FUN oleo JF NIST WORKIMC CAPITAL �.. PROCCSSING DATE 6/27/--• 116SE 3� D REPORT LUMIER A143 .. CGUNTY TION DISTRICT OF OR ANGF COUPfY _ h SANITA._.__. .___._POST.__ ......_. ._.____.._ . ...........-.__.__._ . CLA]MS PAID 17/09/4R POSTING DATE 07/04/99 WARRANT NO. VENDOR A40UNI DESCRIPTION '1 • 197907 FOARORD/JORDAN—_--_--. _ .. _ 3310.55 INSTRUMENT REPAIR ' r 107998 FREDSON R.V. SUPPLY 321.94 TRUCK PARTS 1079 GENERAL CHEMICAL 37.590.00 CHEMICALS � � • I07910 10 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. 11r949.38 TELEPHONE SERVICES 107911 GEORGE LEECH b ASSOCIATES 3 /3.00 8 EMIC SUPP IES _.—..__._.._...._..___t __...._.._____PAR . 107912 C.TCP GREEK IT ASSOCILL.ATES INC. lS4.931.69 SURVEYING ERVI6 107913 DON GREEN I. pSSOCIpT ES f4.S9L 02 SURVEYING SERVICES H88 88-72 107914 MARILYN E. GUI E f TING EXPENSE 079 5 HAC CON ANY 5401. 1 POOP—MEECHEMICALS —_-- -- '1 e :Gl 107916 HARBOUR ENGINEERING 38.157.00 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES FTT 107917 HARR.INGTON`INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS SSR1.07 INSTRUMENT PARS 107918 JAMES R. HARRI6 $629.64 METING EXPENSE 'r n 107919 HATCH R KIRK, INC. 32.192.15 MECHANICAL PARTS 147920 S. A. HEALY CO. $30,042.77 CONSTRUCTION P1-35-1 079 X LLO 3200.U6 TELEPHONE PART 1 '1 i.. .107922 LINDA HIMENES. 320•g0 MIL= EXPENSES . 3 107923 HOFF MAN AIfl L FIL'RATION $136.8R MECHANICAL PARTS — —_--. Flo 79 q HORIZON HIGH-REACH f344.36 TRUCE PASTS "77925 HOUSE OF BATTERIES 11r399.36 BATTERIES 7926 P.S. HU GHES CO.. INC. 5913.22 SAFETY SUPPLIES 7927 CITY OF HUNTINGTDN B M $16. 4 WATER OSEAGE 7928 HUNTINGTON GACHUSRS7AFP $684.60 ` RUBBER STAMPS 7924 HU NT IN6TON SUPPLY 366.11 NAPDYARE 0NUNTI GTON VA L Y CNYINN CYCL 3126.18 BICYCLE PARTS $:� 7931 HYDROTEK. INC. 18,155:51 ENGINE OIL 7932 ICC INSTRUMENT $75.98 M ER REPAIR79 IS[0. )NC. 39.03 .35 IXSTRUMBNY PAIHSB 7934IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL 951,899.56 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.I1-08-89 7935 INDUSTRIALS THREADED PRODUCTS _ $1,915.46 P CONNECTORS7936 INGRAM PA ER f2.S91.317937 INSIDE EP.A. WEEKLY REPOPT 325.75 PUBLICATIONS 793A J A W SCIENTIFIC $28.49 LAB SUPPLIES R 'A S P. S I RYFT� SUGF. .7940 JAY-$ CATERING S245.20 MEETING EXPENSE 79_41 A:F..JDHNSDN COMPANY 397.79 INSTRU LNTPART9 2 N ST N SUPPLY --'—__ _. f271_:_8T A __.__._..7943 HAMAN BEARINGS 9 SUPPLY 31.616.2A FITTINGS 7944 KAMER COMPANY $1.153.42 TOOLS 307945 KAY: rINC. $814.24 �.. 107946 KELLEY BLUE SOON 379.00 PUBLICATION 107947 KENKO. INC. _ 128,045.30 CONSTRUCTION 5-34-2 145.395.3A .._.._. _ CONSTRUCTION-P1-31_._ ,J.. 107949 KING NEARING. INC. f99.55 MACHINE SUPPLIES 107950 LINDA KIRCHNER flI5.C4 MEETING EXPENSE x 15"9 I- -k1RR1�AUQT7FTSC SUFP�(IS.._ ._ -._. . . _.. _ .. $I 13.69. . KARO M 147952 MARTIN KORDICK. SP 32.9.12.30 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 14-1-1B n D. J W FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING, CPP17AL i'ROCLSS7NG UAIE 6/27191 FACE 4 REPORT BUMPER AP43 COUNTY SANITAITON DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ` + t CLAIMS PAID R7/14/93 POSTING DATE 07/04/97 ' '1 a a WARRANT NO• YC NIIOR _ _ ._ _. . AMOUNT. . _,_...._ ._ .-_. DESCRIPTION____. ...—_.__.._�_.. ..____...._.. 137953 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $69.72 SAPETY SUPPLIES " • 107954 LASER. SUPPLIES f SERVICE T265.62 PRINT $UPPLIRS_-___,_._ 10795Y LEE f RO CONSULTING ENOP. $27.221.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-33 � . 101956 LE ROY CRANDALL f ASSOC. $434.70 PILE DRIVING a 107957 ___ JOHN LISEE PUMPS. INC. _ $2,840.56 PUMP PARTS 1079BP N R L TRUCN fl00T 2364.A1 TRUCK PARTS 'lp 107959 MDT BIOLOGIC CO"FARM S234•G0 LAB SERVICES 107960 MPS ____ _ $29.75 PRO TOCRAPBIC SERVICES 107961 MAINTEN MCC 00 CCf�C. $2.188.67 MECHANICAL PARTS "1u 107962 MARINE 6 VALVE SUPPLY $2.692.11 VALVXS + 'n 107963 MARVAC ELECTRONICS. _ $176.93 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES + m 107964 MATT - CHLOR. INC. $3.527.34 - _-CHLORINATION PARTS-------- ------- 'tinIC7 107965 "CHASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. $136.99 BATTERIES uD 107966 MEASUREMENT CONTROL SYS. INC. S333.61 INSTRUMENT ?MTL--- 107967 MICRO VIDEO LEARNING SYSTEMS $1.024.T5 VIDEO SERVICES 7 om I07968' NI CROA6E COMPUT - - _ 31.035.94 CUMPUMR SOFTWAEB/RARDWARE 10T469 M1 CR §OFT BU ERICN- ASIC 4.5 130.63 _COMPUTER PART IO T970 MgTION INDUSTRIES. INC. S2A 4.70 HARDWARE 107971 NEC INFORMATION SYSTEMS $379.84 OFFICE SUPPLIES 107972 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSN _ $133.92 _ PUBLICATION 107973 NATIONAL LUMBER $230.15 HARDWARE IDT974 BUST R. NEWBERG. CONST. CO. $2,186.552.18 CONSTRUCTION PI-33 1- 107975 NORTHERN .BUSINESS GROUP/ INC. - $4.900.00 - DIGESTER CLEANING 307976 DIBRIEN ENERGY SYSTEMS 54.990.00 EMERGENCY GENERATOR REPAIRS 107977 DX SYSTEMS CO. 393.932.60 CHLORINE M.0.2-14-90 C7 107978 ORANGE REARING, INC. f193.22 _ 1�CRAl1ICAL PARTS 107979 ORANGECOAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY $150.13 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 10798 0 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. S267.79 TRUCK PARTS 107981 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. I07982 ORANGE VALVE 6 FITTING CO. $2.279.74 FITTINGS 107913 OKYGCN SERVICE $576.57 SPECIALTY CASES 107984 CSDOC SELF-FUNDED MEDICAL INS __ ___ S10Q1,�.OQ—.___,.86LP YIINDBD.MHDICAL IN9UBANCB MVANCE 07985 MUM Y SANITATION DISTRICT $4,061.97 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE 107986 P.J. RADCLIFFE f SONS $289.00 PUMP TESTING 107987 PSI $91.23 -_ TRUCE NASA PARTS 107989 PACIFIC BAFI7T CO UIF VENT CO. 37•739.46 TELEPHONE SUPPLIER IO1989 PACIFIC BELL 173X.46 TELEPRONE 68&VICES 107990 PAK WEST $272.21 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ____. 07991 PARTS UNLIMITC31.___—__--__�___. 3SGd.80.__. .__—.. :TRUCE PAKPARTS :j ID7992 NTN C. PATTON S90.OS MEETING EXPENSE 107993 _ PATTEN CORP./ TAYLOR IN_S_TN._ _ _ 5.1,394.21 _ _ INSTRUMENT PARTS . .___.._ .. __...._ ... a 0 995 PHOTO A $SYNC EGO. 1426.5E SLUICE MACHINE REPAIRS .�.+ 107996 PIMA 6N0 SYSTEMS.EVI AMC. f43.363.75 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88 a 107996 —PLANTMONIR SERVICE CENTER fN.34 TELEPHONE BQUIPNENT REPAIR _ . . . _ ._...__ T --- P LY U • N S11,471.93 "' _.__ ._. . - POLYMERS W.0.1-10-90.8T9TE9 _ - ------ -- J 107998 POSTMASTER S120.00 P.O. BOX RENTAL 3 ` Fk 0 R1�9 - JI GIST YOYKIY.0 CAITTAL 1POCESSIMG DATE 6/27/9': PAGE , n REPORT If UPPER A143 1 fa UN TY. SANIIpIION,JI I,STRIC 7S.OF-ORANGE COUNTY_ • flAlpS P61O �7/`1/9P POSTING DATE 17%119/40 W RRA NT N0. VEN'OP AMOUNT DESCRIPTION • 107999 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. $14.41 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES • IYR00D PRESENTATION PnI1.0 UE,TS _. _. _.. _ _$133.63...____ . ...__... . _OFFICE.SUPPLIES .. .___. 108001 HAROLD FRIMROSE ICE 9156.40 ICE '1• 308402 PRINTERS A FAX $35.00 OFFICE MACHINE REPAIRS i • - 08003 ' INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION_M.0.8-10-88 108004 RECYC. INC. 149.284.00 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88 1, 168005 RED VALVE CO.. INC. t223.9G SALES TAX ' 108006 RED WING SHOES_____ SIL•3s55�_____—_._— .SAFETY. n y 148007 REMEDY TEMP $1,105.24 TEMPORARY SERVICES ') m 108008 ` THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. 15.l103.66 FITTINGS 108009 - R CH P S WATSON t GERSHON _ �5�ef1.8jA`39,--__ LECAL_3ERYEGE$_M.D,4-8-3L Cy 108010 J. R. RORFRTS CORP. $24.194.00 CONSTRUCTION J-7-4 3. 108011 J. R. POBFRTS $125,940.64 CONSTRUCTION J-17 1S 012 J. R. ROBERTS ROBINSON FLR71LIZER CO. $1.830.63 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 3 1OB011 - ROYCE INSTRUMENT - $1.436.97 INSTRUMENT PART 108013 RUTAR L TUCKER _ 8321075.27 __ _L8G67�8SRVICBB_-_BEATEICELBUMLYESSQN 4t 108016 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. $66.40 PARTS CLEANER C0 108017 KFN SAKANOTO 91/5.00 METING EXPENSE 108018 SANCON ENGINEERING . INC. f260y0N�.�''�_ _—00N8TEUCTION_3c33R_._-- _...- 108019 I'. . . SANTA%ANA ELECTRIC ROTORS f4D7.24 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS nm- '.1OBB20 - SCHULER ENGINEEPING COP.P. f124i431.1 CONSTRUCTION P1-27-162 1- - 108021 SWENTIFIC ELECTRONICS SERV. _ i239�. __ IMSTMUM8MT3ART __ 108022 SEA COAST DESIGNS f432.44 OFFICE FURNITURE S O 108023 SHAMROCK SUPPLY SI,735.93 tl WARE 108024 SHEPHERD MACHINERY CO ._ f2,e1§.1.29 ._BSCSARICAL_PAR'Ls _ _____ . 108025 SNYPAPR Y 8CT MEDICAL CLINIC f1.410.00 POSI= EXAMS Y08026 SMITH-EMERY CO. - 02.510.50 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89 !-' 10802T SOFT WAREHOUSE _ lE7L4,93 __ ._ _._ EW_WTR_E„Ls9MP6RE._ __ 108028 SOLAR TURBINES INC. 145,156.25 GENERATOR REPAIR M.O. 5-9-90 rJ r N 108929 SO. COAST AIR QUALITY f10.224.8C APPLICATION FEES 108030 SO. CALIF. COASTAL WATER s47 y54Y.U0 _.SCCWRPA ADVANCE 108031 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. 6345.153.1R POWER n 100932 30.. CALIF. EDISON CO.. ' f3.915.00 POWER PDLE RELOCATION GIST 7 A 14 108033 SO. .CAL. GAS- CO. __._. =2T:R<R2. __._.__._.. .._._BA171ML GA$____ 108034 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. fP.90R.U9 DIESEL FUEL J ' 100035 SPARKLE77S DRINKING WATER f1.3S7.S1 WATER/COOLER RFB. ALS 10803E MESi ALL OY INC. f1,154 ay.55 WELDING SUPPLIES. 108037 STAR 700E t SUFPLY CO. I816.i1 TOOLS J o 100038 SUMMIT STEEL t1.292.37 !P7'AL 108039 SUPER CHEM COOP f595.00 CBEMICALS 10fl U90 [ONTI UI NTAL AIR TOOL. INC. f7,672.63 TOOLS J 188041 SUP-LITE CORPORATION $75.308.75 WASTE GAS FLARES M.0.6-13-90 100092 7 8 [ INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS. INf _ 11.9E;;7N _ _ ELECTRIC.PASTS__ __ 108043 TAYLOR-OUNN 3268.6E - TRUCK PARTS } 1,80 Ofl 041 37 EUUIPNEN7 COMP AMY 176.57 SAFETY SIGN J 1 r I • FUND NO 9199 - JT PIST NOPKIRF CPPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/27/9' IAGE b p REPORT NUMNLA AURA I COUNTY S4HITAIIOH DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CL FIXS PAIR rt7/.N/9fl POSTINB DATE 117JIf:q/90 `1 a a - WARRANT MO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCPIPT ION 'la 168045 TOP INDUSTRIAL $33.12 BUILDING MATERIAL • 108046 TRAVEL TRAVFL T726.UL TRAVEL SERVICES 108047 TRUCK S AUTO §U LY. INC. S896.41 TRUCK PARTS 108048 J.G.-TUCKER 9 SON. INC. $396.73 INSTRUMENT PARTS • 108049 - UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $181.18 . .._-__ PARCEL SERVICES _. - ..__._-_-_. _ . _.__.. __ .___.-._...___.-_.. . VALLEY CJTIESSS— $7.799.45 LABSUPPLIBS 106352 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. !7♦115.00 FITTINGS 100052 TIC NAEL M. VON YINCNELN4NN __ f115.00 _ MOOTING EXPENSE ' -TOTT S i $ 1Ii159.- - DOOR INSTALLATION "tu b 308 C59 CARL WARREN b CO. $838.55 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 208055 WESTERN CORPORATE IMAGES $8♦512.89 OFFICE EQUIPI%NT lU 6 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS• INC, $205.02 SiRW SUPPLIES 108057 WESTERN PACIFIC EQUIPMENT CO. 3756.8E BRUTAL EQUIPMD7T 108058 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPILY $34.508.88 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-9-89 5 R TIONAL $80.55 TRUCK PARTS n,. 108060 WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY: S1a030.63 INSECTICIDE 108061 JOHN-,.WI LEY-6. SON$. INC• -r S3.93 PUBLICATION 6 K R B COP ♦ .6P COPIER LEAUIS 'l 108063 ZIEBARTH AND ALPER $560♦216.60 CORSTRUCTION P2-37.P1-34-1 ] ----------------- a - TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 07/04/90 $86854 285.36 -- eevee-esa:a:a: SUMMARY ADURT _--_— . 23:50 — r' /2 CAP PAC PUND 176,231.76 J 63 DPER POND 323,607.26 1� CAR AC FUND 190-90--- -- 7 P5 OPER I= 176.58 - P5 CAP PAC FUND 28,978.72 P7 CAP FAC FUND 183,380.37 O11 DPER FDIU 16.54 014 CAP PAC POND 206.332.91 0566 OPBR FORD 1,865.20 -� #667 OVER FUND 2,353.14 17614 DPER I= 3.348.35 CORE 6.710.901.54 SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP INSURANCE 104,900.52 T�iODCIRC-CRPITAL-PORE' J $ 9,854,285.36 J I FUND 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL �. PROCESSING DATE 7/12/9C PAGE l( REPORT NUMHER AP43 F+ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY r' CLAIMS PAID 07ry 8/90 POSTING DATE 07/I8/90 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 1U9087 AT & T $49P.59 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 208088 ACCURATE AIR ENGINEERING £120.53 AIR RILTERS ,> 108009 LINCOLN CARPETS & INTERIORS 9434.66 MINIBLINOS 108090 ACED TECH SURVEYS, INC. 410,700.60 AERIAL SURVEYING OF PLANT 2 208091 AIR ACCESSORIES CO. $248.50 COMPRESSOR PARTS . MOB 092 AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICAL INC. £39,592.00 OAK AL$EE!@IT - OXYGEN GEM SYSTEM M.0.8-9-89 10R093 AM ER.S OC. OF HEAT.. REFRIG. & $110.00 PUBLICATIONS 108094 AMERICAN FLEET PARTS %44.50 TRUCK PARTS � '3. 108095 ROSCO INC. &/OR AMERICAN SEALS $11.412.14 FITTINGS m 108096 AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY $1.463.06 FILM Z 108097 AMERITECH $97.75 COPIER. LEASES C7 108098 BLAKE P. ANDERSON SI,662.23 MEETING EXPENSE `1 108099 ANTHONY-S MECH. & MACHINE. INC $1.554.12 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 108100 APPLE ONE £8$8.37 TEMPORARY SERVICES 108101 APPLIED FILTRATION $10,770.61 PIPE STOPPERS 7 Ym 108102 ARATEX SERVICES, INC. S4.570.83 UNIFORM RENTALS 3 108103 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PROD.. INC $860.04 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS -It 108104 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING $3,493.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89 7 OD 108105 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CO. $169.96 TRUCK PARTS 108106 B & 7 HYDRAULICS $48.16 MECHANICAL PARTS 106107 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $200,848.75 GRIT REMOVAL M.0.1-13-88 1OB108 BABSON & SHEPPARD £6,000.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES -OIL LEASES 'r 108109 BACKSTREET GALLERY £L,360.81 FRAMING r 108210 BANK OF AMERICA NY & SA $5,094,515.11 CERTIF OF PARTICIPATION - INSTALL PAYMENT 7:b IOBI11 BAKTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $2,453.76 LAB SUPPLIES 108112 BAYLESS STATIONERS $1,103.41 OFFICE SUPPLIES 108113 BISHOP COMPANY $525.27 HARDWARE 108114 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $170.00 MUM REPAIRS 108115 BON-A-R UES 5106.25 TRUCK PARTS 108216 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP $39.755.16 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-11 108117 BROWN & CALDWELL £6,881.25 LAB SERVICES LG8118 BROWN & CALDWELL CONSULTING $26.921.58 ENGINEERING SERVICES P2-37 168119 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. 5226.41 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES .7 108120 GARY G. STREED $378.50 PETTY CASH REIMBURh] 108121 CS COMPANY $6,256.45 VALVE PARTS 208122 CAL-CHEN SALES $369.64 HARDWARE ,J 108223 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH, INC. 51.214.44 LAB SUPPLIES 108124 CALTROL , INC. 567.40 REGULATOK PARTE 108125 CALIFORNIA SUPRESSION SYSTEMS $555.00 BALCH MAINTENANCE J 308126 CAROLLO-BOYLE ENGINEERS $8.5q R.32 ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 87-131 108127 CEDAR COMPUTER CENTER. INC. $1,339.79 LAB EQUIPMENT 108128 CENTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM $45.48 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATION J 108129 CHALLENGE BEARING & IND• $FLY $1.564.12 HARDWARE 108130 CHEVRON U.S.A., INC. $2,297.77 DIESEL PDEL 108131 CHURCH ENGINEERING, INC. $117.13 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-13 .� 208132 COLICH AND SONS 97,901.46 EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIRS DIST 2 J� FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/12/9U PAGE 2 py REPORT NUMBER AP43 I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY N CLAIMS PAID 07/38/90 POSTING DATE 07/18/90 WARRANT NO. VENDOR A40UNT OESCnIPTION - 308133 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF 112,022.59 CONFRESSOR PARTS 100134 CONNELL G.M. PARTS / DIV. f207.41 TRUCK PARTS ,1 106135 CON-VAY WESTERN EXPRESS $73.61 FREIGHT 108136 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. $9.046.91 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 108137 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS S6.465.94 BLUEPRINTING M.O.1-10-90 200138 CONTRACTORS BOOK STORE $141.76 PUBLICATION 208139 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS WEST $2,047.73 ENGINEERING SERVICES 108140 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $177.30 TRUCK PARTS 108141 CRANE VEYOR CORP. $296.82 PAINT SUPPLIES 108342 CREATIVE SCREEN ARTS $503.29 SAFETY SUPPLIES fil 1OB 193 Cfl YSTAL.CLEAR WINDOW MA INT. $2.115.90 WINDOW CLEANING Z 108144 CAL WATER S190.75 RENTAL EQUIPMENT C7 108145 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT S4.725.58 STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 108146 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 933.011.60 89'-90' SALES TAX LIABILITY 108147 DAILY PILOT $36.58 NOTICES 6 ADS '7[m . 108148 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE $364.91 TIRES 308149 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES f431.27 PRINTING :'� 108150 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. S345.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 7i*t 108151 DORADO ENTERPRISES. INC. $1,596.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS 00 108152 DORR-OLIVER. INC. $050.01 MECHANICAL PARTS 4�I 108253 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. S1.186.80 PAINT SUPPLIES 7�D 108154 ERA SERVICES. INC. $12.740.79 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-23-2 ;P 108255 EASTMAN, INC. S2.388.85 OFFICE SUPPLIES 108156 EBERHARD EQUIPMENT $66.51 TRUCK PARTS 11 108157 ELECTRONIC BALANCING CO. $509.09 IMPELLER 108158 ENCHANTER. INC. $2,200.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.3-14-90 108159 FACILITIES SUPPORT CO. $398.12 TOOL —yj 108160 JOHN B. FALKENSTEIN P.E. S3.562.50 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-4,J-20,J-17 108161 FARR SALES S SERVICE $557.95 FILTERS 106262 FEDERAL RAL EXPRESS CORP. f356.00 AIR FREIGHT •--1 108163 FERRELLGAS $22.95 PROPANE ' C/M 108164 FISCHER S PORTER CO. S2.889.57 CHLORINATION PARTS 108165 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $127.50 LAB SUPPLIES 108166 FLAT 6 VERTICAL CONCRETE $09.75 CONCRETE CUTTING 108167 FOLSOM LAKE FORD $88,533.81 TRUCKS M.0.5-9-90 108168 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $061.55 FILM J 108169 FOX ENTERPRISES f19825.0U SAFETY CONSULTANT 108170 THE FOXBORO CO. $797.46 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 108171 CITY OF FULLERTON S83.61 WATER USEACE .) 109172 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $6.008.81 TELEPHONE SERVICES 108173 GTERLICH-MITCHELL. INC. $17,303.33 MECHANICAL PARTS 108174 HAROLD GOLDBERG - $116.75 1/17 RACK-UP CLAIM .J 308175 DON GREEK S ASSOCIATES $4.368.75 SURVEYING SERVICES US 88-72 108176 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $135.57 GAUGE 108177 HATCH B KIRK, INC. S11.409.37 MECHANICAL PARTS .J 108178 HAUTER FORD S47T738.15 AUTOMOBILES M.0.4-11-90 ,J lC7 A . FUN( 9199 - JT DIST HORNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/12/9UPAGE. 3( \ CO REPORT NUMHE9 AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY A' W CLAIMS FA 1D U7/18/9n POSTING DATE 07/18/90 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 108179 S. A. HEALY CO. 1.8,341.72 SEWER REPAIR DIST 7 108180 MOUSE OF BATTERIES $116.47 BATTERIES 108181 STEVEN J HOVEY $495.00 MEETING EXPENSE 108102 R.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. $4.316.28 HARDWARE 208183 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $16,855.52 WATER USMCE 1U8184 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STAMP $2.484.24 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 OB 185 ENERGY SERVICES GROUP 1922.44 ENGINE PARTS 1OBIRS IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL 169.916.5R FERRIC CHLORIDE H.0.11-08-89 108187 INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS. INC. $707.95 ELECTRIC CARTS 108188 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1,127.15 CONNECTORS m 1O8189 INGRAM PAPER $118.89 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES z 108190 INTERNATIONAL SENSOR TECH. $1,561.63 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1. C7 108191 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $27.07 WATER USEAGE I'� n 108192 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP. 5460.81 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 108193 JAY-S CATERING $623.58 MEETING EXPENSE fl 106194 KAMAN BEARINGS A SUPPLY $10.50 FITTINGS ( . 3 108195 KANER COMPANY 1715.38 TOOLS 108196 KEENAN SUPPLY $313.62 VAVLE 71iC, 108197 KEITH-STEVENS, INC. 129.1100.00 HAINTEUANCE SYSTEM STUDY "I 108198 KEN•S OIL. INC. 1170.00 WASTE OIL DISPOSAL 1 '108199 KING BEARING. INC. $8.125.42 MACHINE SUPPLIES 108200 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $983.71 HARDWARE 108201 MARTIN KORDICK. SR $2,145.10 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 14-I-IB,5-35-1,5-36-1 1- 109202 KRIEGER PUBLISHING CO. INC. $66.60 PUBLICATION 108203 LASER SUPPLIES B SERVICE $509.79 PRINT SUPPLIES 108204 LEE A NO CONSULTING ENGR. 130.010.OD ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-33 108205 LE ROT CRANDALL 8 ASSOC. $2,653.21 ENGINEERING SERVICES - GEOTECNNICAL z 308206 LIFECOM-SAFETY SERVICE SUPPLY $276.71 STROBE LIGHT 108207 LIMITORGUE CORP. 51.680.36 INSTRUMENT PART M 1O8208 LOTUS BEVEL. COPR. 1360.uO COMPUTER SOP1'IIARE •� 108209 A.J. LYNCH CO. 5418.20 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 108210 MBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $6.035.00 OCEAN MONITORING 108211 MACOMCO $181.20 SERVICE AGREEMENTS 7' IOB 212 MAIN FRAME SERVICES 5860.0C INSTRUMENT REPAIR 108213 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $17.02 INSTRUNERT SUPPLIES 108214 MATT - CHLOR. INC. $2,826.25 CHLORINATION PARTS J 1OB215 DON MAURER 53,350.09 OCEAN STUDY 108216 MAXWELL COLORS $68.66 FILM DEVELOPING 108217 MCKENNA ERGO. E EQUIP. 14,392.87 MECHANICAL PARTS J 108218 MCKINLET EQUIPMENT CORP 1287.84 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 108219 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. 9595.33 BENCH 108228 THOMAS R. HELTON $212.37 TRAVEL EXPENSE J 1O8221 MICROAGE COMPUTER 12.492.12 COMPUTER SOF'M..RE/HARDWARE 308222 MILLAR ELEVATOR SERVICE 12.432.67 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 108223 MONITEK. INC. $2,114.93 METER PARTS .) 108224 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES S6,U14.25 LAB SERVICES J � W FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 111?/93 F•GE 4 1 Id - REPORT NUMBER AF43 D COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/I8/9P POSTING DATE 117/IP/90 WARRANT ND. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCNi.71ON 108225 MORGAN CRANE CO.. INC. 5149.66 THOU PARTS 108226 NATIONAL LUMBER 1526.0E HARDWARE 108227 NEW HENNES' INC. 566.93 NAMEPLATE MATERIALS 108228 NEWARK ELECTRONICS 1114.45 INSTRUMENT PART ICS229 ST NIELSON SERVICE . INC. 3177.50 LAB ESTATES. ,1 108230 O.M.S./SOLAG DISPOSAL CO $2,425.00 TWO BIN REMOVAL 108231 OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORP. 186.8O LAB SUPPLIES 108232 OFFICE PAVILION/INTERIOR RES. $1,275.69 OFFICE FURNITURE J-7-5 108233 OR SYSTEMS CO. $32,677.63 CHLORINE M.0.2-14-90 108234 ORANGE BEARING. INC. $470.35 HARDWARE m 108235 OXYGEN SERVICE $603.22 SPECIALTY GASES p 108236 COUNTY OF ORANGE $6,810.00 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES 7 :1. 108237 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 59.245.58 REIMBURSE WORKERS CORP INSURANCE 108238 PSI $563.10 PONT PART 100239 PACIFIC PARTS $749.90 COMPUTER SOMME Fm 108240 PACIFIC PROCESS EBUIPMENT.INC. 1933.51 VAVLE PARTS 108241 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $998.36 SAFETY SUPPLIES 108242 PACTEL CELLULAR 591.68 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES T W 108243 PAGE ONE $53.13 PRINTING 1O0244 PARTS ENGINEERING COMPANY $111.05 COMPUTER PARTS I08245 PARTS UNLIMITED $790.98 TRUCK PARTS 108246 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS, INC. 547.101.15 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88 r 108247 PLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE 565.48 HARDWARE 108248 PLASTIC INDUSTRIES $304.09 PLASTIC BOTTLES 108249 POLYPURE, INC. 115,933.04 POLYMERS M.0.1-10-90.8-9-89 108250 POWER SYSTEMS 52.927.27 ELECTRIC REPAIRS I08251 PRENTICE - HALL. INC. $57.64 PUBLICATIONS 108252 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE 3184.00 ICE 108253 PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEMS $377.62 CONTROL BOARD E't 108254 THE PROJECTS SOLUTION CO. $3,816.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.8-10-88 _N 108255 PULSAFEEDER S310.77 PONT PARTS 108256 PUMP ENGINEERING CO. $10,859.91 PUMP PARTS 108257 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. 1968.06 TRASH DISPOSAL 108258 RECYC. INC. $40.280.00 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88 108259 P.A. REED ELECTRIC $4.769.32 MOTOR REPAIR 108260 REMOTE METER RESETTING SYSTEM $3.000.00 POSTAGE .J 108261 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. 5370.46 FITTINGS 108262 ROACH WATER TECHNOLOGY. INC. 5135.12 VALVE PARTS 108263 ROBINSON FER71LIZER CO. 16.183.75 NEED KILLER ,.1 108264 ROSEMONT ANALYTICAL $1,436.57 ANALYSER PARTS 108265 ROSEMOUNT/UNILOC 565.88 FITTINGS 108266 ALBERT G. ROTHEY. LTD. $527.94 TOOL ., 108267 RUTAN S TUCKER $23,529.27 LEGAL SERVICES - BEATRICE/HUNT WESSON 108268 JOSEPH T. RYERSON S SON. INC. $267.40 STEEL 108269 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. 52.716.25 PARTS CLEANER J 100270 SANTA ANA CANVAS CO. 1528.IP ELECTRIC PARTS lb A FUNk 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/12/90 PAGE 5( w 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 L11 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/18/90 POSTING DATE 07/18/90 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 108271 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT•L A95.715.29 OCEAN MONITORING H.0.6-13-90 108272 SEA COAST DESIGNS $224.69 OFFICE MACHINE REPAIRS ,1 108273 SEAL ENGINEERING CO. $341.75 PUNT PARTS 108274 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $376.36 PAINT SUPPLIES 108275 SHEPHERD MACHINERY CO. $1.970.71 TRUCK PARTS 108276 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC 91,211.00 PHYSICAL GRAMS 108277 SMITH-EMERY CO. $1,347.50 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89 108278 SOLAR TURBINES INC. $1.268.28 TURBINE REPAIRS 108279 SOUTH COAST DODGE S102.85 TRUCK PARTS - `l 'm 10826D SOUTH COAST PLAZA S2.510.63 1/17 BACK-UP CLAIM m 108281 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. $18.508.64 POWER Z 108282 SO. CAL. GAS CO. S4.69R.02 NATURAL GAS 108283 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $5,117.00 DIESEL MEL : ': 108284 SOUTHWEST MATERIAL HANDLING $761.55 FREIGHT 108285 STAMEN Z. SPASSOFF. P.E. $5,280.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-162 7 m 108286 WESTALLOY INC. $210.06 WELDING SUPPLIES 100287 SPECTRE% S629.68 METER 108288 STAR TOOL 6 SUPPLY CO. $1.804.71 TOOLS 7. Im 108289 STERLING ART $73.23 GRAPHIC SERVICES 108290 SUMMIT STEEL $522.54 STEEL 108291 SUNSET FORD $22.122.50 TRUCK 108292 SUPER CHEM CORP $658.75 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 108293 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL. INC. $2,558.21 TOOLS ,n 100294 SUR-CITE CORPORATION $63,590.63 WASTE GAS PLARE6 _ 'tl 108295 T R C INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS. INC S1.460.78 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 108296 TALIN TIRE. INC. $131.58 TIRES Cn 108297 TAYLOR-DUNN $152.10 ELECTRIC CART P-kRTS 7 A 108298 TEXMATE. INC. '$161.02 METER ti 108299 CHARLES E. THOMAS $869.20 TRUCK PARTS "n 108300 TOP INDUSTRIAL 333.46 BUILDING MATERIAL N 108301 TOTAL PREVENTION SYSTEMS $348.00 ENGINEEERINC SERVICES PI-27-1 108302 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE. INC. $153.70 SAFETY SUPPLIES 108303 TRAVEL TRAVEL S379.00 TRAVEL SERVICES .7 108304 TRUCK 6 AUTO SUPFLY. INC. $1,920.52 TRUCK PARTS 108305 J.G. TUCKER A SON, INC. S637.62 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 108306 U.S. AUTO GLASS CENTER.INC. S116.83 TRUCK PARTS '7 108307 UNOCAL $279.17 GASOLINE 108308 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $240.29 PARCEL SERVICES 108389 VUR SCIENTIFIC $1.897.88 LAB SUPPLIES 'J 100310 VALIN CORPORATION 3464.34 REGULATOR PARTS 108311 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $8,366.97 N WARE/FITTINGS 108312 VERTEX SYSTEMS $7,259.00 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 108313 VICI METRONICS $306.56 MECHANICAL PARTS 108314 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $877.18 SAFETY SUPPLIES 108315 VILLAGE NURSERIES $371.88 GROUND COVER ..1 108316 'JOHN R. WAPLES S531.50 ODOR CONTROL CONSULTANT CU J I V'I FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING GATE 7/12/9U PAGE 6 py REPORT NUMBER AP43 C!T COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTSOF ORANGE COUNTY 1 - CLAIMS PAID 67/I8/90 POSTING DATE 07/I8/90 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION r. 108317 WATERMAN SUPPLY S398.44 CHAIN 106318 WEIR OIL CO. $24.09 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT 108319 WESTERN PACIFIC EQUIPMENT CO. 9451.84 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 108320 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY $37,536.37 CAUSTIC SODA M.O. 8-9-89 108321 YESCO $296.86 ELECTRIC PART 108322 XEROX CORP. $7,192.36 COPIER LEASES '1 108323, GEORGE YARDLEY COMPANY 9397.30 VALVE PARTS 108324 EVERETT H. YORK CO. $512.58 ENGINE PARTS 198325 LUCY 2AHRAN, INC. S5.250.00 1/17 BACK-UP CHAIN - _ bTOTAL CLAIMS PAID 07/18/90 S60U4,635.51 r, SUMMARY AMOUNT OI OPER FUND i 750.00 01 CONST FORD 1,075,501.41 7,Lp 02 OPER FUND 12.054.87 /2 CAP FAC FORD 441.43 ! II 02 CONST FUND 1,928,951.05 7;D 03 OPER FUND 14,049.63 03 CAP PAC FUND 2.045.74 )? 03 CONST FUND 2,090,062.65 05 OPER FUND 4.382.56 N05 CAP PAC FUND 4.364.12 „ 06 OPER FUND 525.75 '7A 07 OPER FUND 11.173.64 07 CAP FAC FUND 42,237.95 C"O UN O11 OPER FIRED 1,573.51 �'N 113 OPER FUND 85.00 114 OPER FUND 22.00 014 CAP PAC FUND 3,850.46 J 0566 OPER FUND 5,537.99 JT OPER FUND 729,738.03 CORP 368,265.20 Z SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FUND 17.122.96 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND 191,899.56 6,504,635.51 J to RESOLUTION NO. 90-97 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF ANIONIC POLYELECTROLYTE CHEMOLYMER, P ATI . ­P-1ZU A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF �i COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF ANIONIC POLYELECTROLYTE CHEMICAL POLYMER, SPECIFICATION NO. P-120, TO CALLAWAY CHEMICAL COMPANY, DIVISION OF EXXON CHEMICAL COMPANY The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, 00 HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Purchasing Manager that award of contract be made to Callaway Chemical Company, Division of Exxon Chemical Company, for Purchase of Anionic Polyelectrolyte Chemical Polymer, Specification No. P-120, and the bid tabulation and recommendation, and proposal submitted for said specification are hereby received and ordered filed; and, �i Section 2. That a Purchase Contract for Specification No. P-120 be awarded to Callaway Chemical Company, Division of Exxon Chemical Company, for the price of $.865 per wet pound plus sales tax, furnished and delivered in accordance with the terns and conditions of said specification and the bid proposal therefor, for a one-year period beginning September 1, 1990, with provision for four one-year extensions upon mutually-agreeable terms; and, Section 3. That the Chai man and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign said Purchase Contract with said supplier to supply anionic polyelectrolyte chemical polymer pursuant to the specifications and purchase contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel ; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said material are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 8, 1990. "C-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-1" COUNTY SANRA m IIISTSICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFOHNtA 10564 EWS AVENUE ?a.SM 8127 July 15, 1990 wUNTAIN VALLEY.UU W SNIA 8241. O1412524.11 MEMORANDUM TO: Wayne Sylvester, General Manager SUBJECT: Purchase of Anionic Polyelectrolyte chemical Polymer, ' Specification No. P-12O Sealed bids were opened Tuesday, July 10, 1990 for the purchase and delivery of Anionic Polyelectrolyte Chemical Polymer for a one-year period beginning September 1, 1990. Tabulation of bids is as follows: Product Estimated Cost Estimated Vendor No. Otv. (lbs) Per lb. Annual cost 1. Calloway Jayfloc 209, 280 $0.865 $181,027.20 Chemical 809 Company Georgia 2. Western Hydrofloc 4, 185,600 0.0489 204,675.84 States 2O2A Chemical Supply Co. Orange, CA 3. Nalco Nalco 7768 257, 580 0.85 218,943.00 Chemical Company Illinois 4. Polypure, Clarifloc 4, 185,600 0.0574 240,253.44 Inc. LY15O New Jersey 5. Aqua Ben NO BID Orange, CA It is recommended the award be made to Calloway Chemical Company, low bidder, for a one-year contract period starting September 1, 1 1990. The total estimated annual cost of $181,027.20, plus sales fir✓ "C-2" AGENDA ITEM A9(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-2" • PURCHASE OF ANIONIC POLYELECTROLYTE CHEMICAL POLYMER Page 2 tax, is based on furnishing 209,280 wet pounds of polymer at a unit price of $0.865 per wet pound. Because of increased efficiency of the proposed polymer the equivalent unit price from the low bidder is 15% less than the current contract. Provisions are in the specifications for four consecutive one-year contract extensions. Ted Hoffman, Purchasing Manager I hereby concur with the above recommendation: 6&�4 %-as Gav G. reed, Director" f Finance ' V -Q- 1 Robert Ooten, Assistant Plant Superintendent, Operations "C-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-3" AV HokraChem West, Inc 1743 3.Dou9lan Road Suite C Anaheim,CA 92808 Telephone(7l4) 385-1600 July 16, 1990 Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 ATTN: Mr. Ted Hoffman Dear Ted: This is to confirm our conversation of todays date in which I advised that we made an error in calculating our cost on our bid for your forthcoming caustic soda requirement (Bid P-121 ) . Since you require 46% material rather than 50% we calculated our cost as though we were selling a dilute solution rather than a dry ton.We must therefore withdraw our bid and ask you to accept our sincere regret for any inconvenience this may have caused. Very truly youry, John'Simion President "D" AGENDA ITEM #9(c)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "D" RESOLUTION NO. 90-98 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF CAUSTIC SODA SOLUTION, SPECIFICATION N -121 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF CAUSTIC SODA SOLUTION, SPECIFICATION NO. P-121, TO WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY CORPORATION The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Purchasing Manager that award of contract be made to Western States Chemical Supply Corporation for Purchase of Caustic Soda Solution, Specification No. P-121, and the bid tabulation and recommendation, and proposal submitted for said specification are hereby received and ordered filed; and, - Section 2. That a Purchase Contract for Specification No. P-121 be awarded to Western States Chemical Supply Corporation for the price of $348.49 per dry ton, plus freight and sales tax, furnished and delivered in accordance with the terms and conditions of said specification and the bid proposal therefor, for a one-year perlod beginning September 1, 1990, with provision for a one-year extension; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign said Purchase Contract with said supplier to supply caustic soda pursuant to the specifications and purchase contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel ; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said material are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 8, 1990. "E-1" 'AGENDA ITEM #9(C)(3) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-1" July 12, 1990 COUNTY SANITATION UISTRICU of ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFOGNIA MEMORANDDM 10 RMS AVEWE Fa BOX 81V TO: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager '^^'x v1LL141C W 11 az».rA Yn Y 4 n+u 96a2A1+ FM: Ted Hoffman, Purchasing Manager RE: PURCHASE OF CAUSTIC SODA, SPECIFICATION NO. P-121 Sealed bids were opened .Tuesday, July 10, 1990, for the purchase and delivery of Caustic Soda Solution for a one year period beginning September 1, 1990. Tabulation is attached. Based on the estimated annual usage of 3, 600 dry tons of Caustic Soda, (1,350 tons for treatment plant scrubbers and 2,250 dry tons for the Trunk Line Odor Control Program) , the costs for the one year period will be approximately $1, 395,396.00, including freight, sales tax and super£und tax. Of this total, the estimated annual cost for the Trunk Sewer Odor Abatement Program is $872, 122.50, 50% to be paid by District No. 3 and 50% by the Joint Districts. The apparent low bidder, Holtrachem West, Inc. , contacted the Purchasing Manager, Monday, July 16, 1990, to request their bid proposal be rejected due to an error in computation. A copy of request letter for bid rejection is included with this package. It is recommended the letter from Holtrachem West, Inc. requesting bid rejection be approved. It is further recommended the award be made to Western States chemical Corporation, lowest responsible bidder, for an annual cost of $1, 395,396.00, based on estimated usage. The existing contract for caustic soda includes a price adjustment at the end of the first six months. The present contract cost for caustic soda is $381.80 per dry ton including freight and taxes. The new contract will be a firm price for the one year period. The cost per ton will be approximately 1 1/2% more than the existing contract price. i Ted Hof fmfin, Purchasing Manager We hereby concur with the foregoing recommendation: ( , - / n ary Streed, Robert Ooten, �ar� Director of Finance Assistant Superintendent, Operations "E-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(C) (3) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-2" PURCHASE OF CAUSTIC SODA SOLUTION, SPECIFICATION NO. P-121 TABULATION OF BIDS: Total Cost per Preight Sales Superfund Cost Estimated Comv Dry to Per Ton TAX Tas: P Ton Annual Cost 1. Western States Chemical Corp. Orange $348.49 $17.06 $21.78 $.28 $387.61 $1,395,396.00 2. Imperial West Chemical Co. Antioch, CA 349. 00 20.00 21.81 included 390.81 1,406,916.00 3. Van Waters & Rogers Los Angeles 372. 00 18.75 24.42 included 415.17 1,494,612.00 4. Holtrachem West, Inc. Anaheim *324.64 17.26 20.29 included 362.14 1,303,844.00 5. Commerce Chemical Co. City of Industry NO BID 6. L.A. Chemical Co. South Gate NO BID * Vendor requested their bid be rejected. V� E-3" AGENDA ITEM #4(r.) (3) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-3" COU Y SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 4 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 Ef -T AVENUE EaNTP.IN VALLEY, CAlJTaUIIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. TWo (2) CC1IlRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE _August 8, 1990 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 Amount of this Change Order (Arid) (Dsduat) $ 57,876.31 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or defivrt9nns from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - ELECTRICAL CONDUIT The contract documents in the Standard Specifications Section 44-26 specified rigid aluminum conduit and Section 44-26 specified aluminum boxes. It was determined that EMT conduit and pressed steel boxes for all concealed raceways would meet the Districts' requirements for this installation without sacrificing the electrical integrity of the system. Therefore the Contractor was directed l / to provide costs for using END.' conduit in lieu of aluminum conduit and pressed steel boxes in lieu of alumimnn boxes. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A pursuant to General Provisions. (Reference: OCSD letter of March 14, 1990) DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($ 21,345.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - FIRE ALARM SMOKE DETECTORS The contract documents in Section 68-16000.12 Fire Alarm System "Smoke Detectors" specifier) air-duct type detectors. This type of detector is not an industry standard and it was determined that we could receive the same degree of fire protection at a cost savings to the Districts by using standard industry ionization smoke detectors. Therefore the Contractor was requester) to Provide costs for using the standard industry ionization smoke detectors in lieu of air-duct type detectors. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: OCSD letter dated March 14, 1990) DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($ 5,000.00) TIME EXM SION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "F-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-1" CO7Wy cawmATTON DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 4 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 FIT•TR AVENUE ECURIAIN VALLEY, allXECRTIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE August 8, 1990 JOB:_CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 Item 3 - LIGHTNING PROTECTION The contract documents in Section 68-16000.13 of the Detailed Specifications specified lightning protection for the entire building. It was determined that this type of protection was unnecessary due to the fact that lightning storms are extremely rare in this area, and no other treatment plant complex is equipped with this type of protection. Therefore, the Contractor was directed to eliminate the costs the lightning protection for the entire building. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference. OCSD letter dated March 14, 1990) DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (12,615.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER FIRM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 - WASTE AND VENT PIPE The contract documents in Section 66-15100.26 for lab waste and vent piping "'A' Above Ground" call for borosilicates glass pipe and "'B' Below Slab and underground Pipe" to be glass-lined ductile iron. The glass-lined ductile iron pipe was not manufactured in the sizes specified. Plastic EUseal pipe was substituted for both types of pipes specified for waste and vent pipe for the laboratories. Therefore the Contractor was directed to provide Fuseal pipe in lieu of the borosilicate glass pipe and the glass-lined ductile iron pipe. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: Contractor Change Order Request No. 1, dated April 19, 1990) DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: $ (19,000.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days It� - UNDERGROUND PIPING FROM CHILLER BUILDING TO THE CENTRAL LABORATORY The Contractor was directed to furnish and install hot and cold water piping to serve the HVAC equipment in the new Central laboratory building from the co-generation facility to be constructed in the future. The reasons for installing these pipelines at this time is to complete the Central Laboratory landscape and to complete the landscaping of the remaining open area south of the Administration Building adjacent to the new North Road. (This work was scheduled to be completed under a separate contract.) This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 114,470.31 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "F-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-2" COUNTY SANrTMON DISTRICTS OF ORAL COUNTY Page 3 of 4 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE EaNTAIN VALLEY, CALIKE IIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Two (21 CONTRA=: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE August 8, 1990 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATCRI, JOB NO. J-17 ITEM 6 - STEEL BRACING The Contractor was directed to change the width of the outside leg of six 8x8x5/8-inch steel angle framing members as detailed on Sheet 5-11, Detail B and D of the construction drawings. The width of the steel angles will be changed to six inches instead of the specified eight inches for the outside legs. The thickness of the angles will change from 5/8-inch to 3/4-inch. These changes are a result of the required four layers of drywall fire protection which, when applied to the steel framing, interferes with the glass storefront system. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: POO 4) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 1,366.00 TIME EXTEENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 57,876.31 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prise work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time node by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TINB Original Contract Date March 1, 1990 Original Contract Time 420 Calendar Days Original Completion Date April 24, 1991 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Tine Extension 7 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 427 Calendar Days Revised Final C®pletum Due Date May 1, 1991 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable , Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable "F-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-3" CO= SANI=CN DISIItICTS CP MANGE OCURrY Page 4 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 108" PIT AVENUE EaRM:IN VALid:Y, (`DT.TFTSOMA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Two (2) CCUnIAMM: J. R. Roberts rporation DATZ August 8, 1990 JOB: CENTRAT IABORATCRY. JOB NO. J-17 Original Contract Price $ 7,090,000.00 Prev.Auth. Changes $ 22,378.00 This Change (Add) (Daduct) $ 57,876.31 Amended Contract Price $ 7,170,254.31 Board Authorization Date: August 8, 1990 COUNW SnnmrnmtCN DISMCIS CF MANGE COMM, CALTFMMA BY: 7- /»e g 7—h- gineer Date ctian Manager Date BY: AS 7O hector of &Xjx:eering Date General Counsel Date J. R. FIMEM CEPPMAEM Contractor Date "F-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-4" COUNTY SANITATION DLSERIC15 OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 5 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 FIT AVENUE EDlIId= VALLEY, CAI.IEURNM 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Six (6) CONPPAC1l7A: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE &MIE 8, 1990 JOB: WZEHOLISE AND MAIIwiR:OU4M BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING II4 RMDENIS. JOB NO. J-20 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 30,840.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract wok are hereby authorized and as ccmpensation therefor, the following additions to or deducL rma frmm the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - HUM DUCT ADDMCN AND HDDIFICATION The Contractor was directed to furnish and install additional ductwork to provide air in the bathrncs and locker row on the second floor of Building 6 for a future heating system. Also included in this item was the relocation of ductwork in the electrical shop area on the first floor of Building g 6 to avoid interference with the new jib crane. These ductwork additions and modifications were not shcwwn� on the contract drawings nor included in the contract specifications. This iten of work was aocouqi1ished on time and material basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2B of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 25) ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,026.00 TLA1L EXTENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 5 Calendar Days Item 2 - JIB CRANE PMIFICATION The Contractor was directed to lower the height of the jib crane 4h, inches due to interference with steel framing supporting the second floor in Building 6. The jib crane had been fabricated according to dimensions shown in the contract specifications which proved to be incorrect when the jib crane was installed. It was necessary to return the jib crane to the shop, cut a section out of the coluan and reweld the baseplate. This item of work was ac=pli.shed by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 21) ADDED COST TBIS CHANGE ORDER rFEM: $ 996.00 TIM EMMION THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "G-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-1" COUNTY SANr=CN DISTRICTS OF (ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 0£ 5 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 1ffT.TR AVENOS EaDWLIN VALLEY, allaFORIIA 92708 CHANCE ORDER C. O. NO. Six (6) CONIRACiOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE August 8. 1990 JOB: WAPIMUSE AND MAIN ENANCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING ImpRamm TS. JOB No. J-20 Item 3 - BUILDING 4 INTBRIOR WALL COVERING The Contractor was directed to cover the exposed interior insulated walls in Building 4 with 3/8-inch plywood and secure 2-inch x 4-inch framing to the concrete walls with clip angle connectors. This was necessary to provide a finished surface, cover the exposed unfaced fiberglass insulation and secure the framing to the exterior tilt-up walls. Wall covering for Building 4 and clip angles were not included in the contract plans and specifications. This item of work was aa-cuplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: FM 22) ADDED COST THIS CHUM (HIDER ITEM: $ 9,601.00 TIME EXnWION THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 - AUTO SHOP ROOF INSULATION ADDITION The Contractor was directed to place an additional }-inch of insulation over the existing roof insulation on the existing Auto Shop. This was required by Manville (roofing material manufacturer) in order for them to provide a 20-year bond on the new roof installation. The contract plane and specifications did not disclose that the existing Auto Shop had a 2-inch thick mat of fiber insulation laid on tap of the plywood roof sheathing. This was discovered when the old roofing material was removed. The removal process left the toga of the old insulation uneven due to asphalt sticking and pulling away the top layers of the old insulation. The Manville representative required an even surface for pl.acamnt of the new roof and adding a new layer of insulation was determines to be the least expensive method to achieve this result. This item of work was aoccuplished on a time and material basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: FW 23) ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER rTEM: $ 3,388.00 TIME OXTENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days V� "G-2" .AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-2" COUNTY SANr=CN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COZTEY Page 3 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 FELT c AVENUE Fa TAIN VALLEY, cmr.IFnuNrrn 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Six (6) CONn;Lz 7R: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE August 8. 1990 JOB: W MHOUSE AND D902M]ANE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING INETOVEMENM, JOB ND. J-20 Item 5 - WATER VALVE VAULT ADDITION The Contractor was directed to add three concrete valve vaults to enclose and protect valves on the new site fire protection water system serving the warehouse building complex. The water valve vaults were not shown on the contract drawings or included in the contract specifications. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: EC:O 24) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER MEM: $ 5,205.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 6 - BUILDING 6 TILE ADDITION The Contractor was directed to add additional tile wainscot in the men's and wem:n's shower areas on the second floor of Building 6. The contract drawings did not show tile wainscot completely covering the walls in the shower rooms. Tile wainscot throughout the shower areas was deemed necessary to facilitate future cleaning and maintenance. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: POO 25) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,087.00 TINE EXTENSION TBIS CHANGE ORDER ITR4: 0 Calendar Days Item 7 - TO= CMPAKID'D;Nf PARTITION ADDMCN The Contractor was directed to add overhead bracing to the floor-mounted toilet compartment partitions in the men's and wcuen's bathrooms on the second floor of p,irwii 6. This was recommended by the toilet partition manufacturer due to the 1I-inch thick concrete building floor construction. A floor braced toilet partition system sires a minimum of 3-inch thick structural concrete to ensure shebility. overhead bracing was not included in the contract specifications. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 26) ADDED COST THIS CHAIM ORDER ITEM: $ 657.00 -- TIMC EX'ffi14ICN THIS CHANGE ORDER rTEM: 0 Calendar Days 1 , "G-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-3.. COUNTY .SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COE= Page 4 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ETLT AVENUE EXDTTAIN VALDEY, CAr.TLT1MA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Six (6) CONIRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE August 8. 1990 JOB: ➢iAZEHOUSE AND =?TENF.NCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPERSING n11ROVEMEN S. JOB NO. J-20 Item 8 - FUMING ADDITIONS AND WDMCATICNS The Contractor was directed to make several plumbing auditions and modifications in Builduig 6. Included in this item was the addition of a hot water recirculation system rerouting of piping around bulling structural members, adding a gas outlet for a future roof-mounted heater for the bathroom area. and adding and modifying the condensate drains for the roof-mounted HVAC units and water heater. The hot water recirculation system was added in order to conserve water due to the extremely long runs of hat water piping inside the building. These changes were not shown on the contract drawings nor included in the contract specifications. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 28 and FCO 19) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER I'Igi: $ 6,880.00 TINE EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER rm: 3 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 30,840.00 TOTAL TIME EI{'ffiiSICN THIS CHANGE ORDER: 8 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 8 days' extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUK,2W OF CONTRACT TDE Original Contract Date February 27, 1989 Original Contract Time 240 Calendar Days Original Completion Date October 25, 1989 Time Extension this C.O. 8 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 51 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 291 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date December 15, 1989 Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable "G-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF MANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 5 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 PELTS AVENUE ELAIITPAIN VALLEY, CUaMRCIIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Six (6) CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE August 8, 1990 _ JOB: WAREHOUSE AND MINTS ANCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING II44CVEWNTS, JOB NO. J-20 Original Contract Price $ 3,266,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 236,984.34 This Change (Add) (D ) $ 30,840.00 Aue=M Contract Price $ 3,533,824.34 Board Authorization Date: August 8, 1990 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS CE - MANGE COUNTY, CAUXORNIASUMTATED BY: ED BY: dad g• -/�' O 7/ 1p iiiew DateCdhstruction Manager Date D BY: APP AS TO 6r ✓mom i6 F� D' or of 'Engineering Date General Coimsel Date J. R. ROBERTS CORPMUMEW BY Contractor Date "G-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-5" COUMT cmnrtmn CN DISMCTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10044 E:T.TR AVENUE FOIIDITALN VALLEY, allaECMM 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. M. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: Ziebarth & Aber DATB August 8, 1990 JOB: GAS DANDLING FACrr.T= AT RECLAMATION PIANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-1 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (AeAisk) $ 35.609.00 in accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. item 1 - GAS CCHPRE.SSOR PAYMENT TEMS This item provides for joint payment and bonding for manufacturer of six gas corpressors. Normally, payment is made only to the Contractor upon the delivery of etm:pamnt. However, because the purchase price of the ca pressors constitutes 30 percent of the total contract price, the supplier has requested a `a..� payment schedule c®mensurate with the progress of the work. The staff recamends a change to Section 10-1 of the General Provisions to allow partial payments to both the general contractor and the supplier for these eanpressors as specified herein and in accordance with the schedule shown below. D¢rediately upon approval of this change order, the supplier, at its sole cost and expense, shall provide the Districts with a performance Bond or bank standby letter of credit, in a form approved by the Districts' General Counsel to assure performance by the supplier under this agreement. The bond or letter of credit shall be in the amount of $3,487,168.80, representing 90 percent of the cost of the compressors, and my be submitted in incremental amounts equal to the schedule of payments payable by the Districts to supplier and general contractor pursuant to the schedule. Districts' payments to supplier and general contractor shall be due, as listed below, upon the submittal by the supplier of an acceptable bond or bank letter of credit in incremental amounts equal to the schedule of the payments to be paid. The amount of the bond will be reduced by the Districts upon delivery of each coupressor unit in accordance with all the terms, conditions and specifications of the Contract. All partial payments by the Districts shall be paid jointly to Ziebarth & Alper (general contractor) and Cooper Industries (supplier) . These partial payments will be paid separate from the contract's normal progress payments relating to construction. The deduction in contract price for this item is reimbursement to the Districts for added accounting and off-site inspection expenses incurred for issuing partial payments and accepting the surety. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. "H-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-1" COUNTY SARIT UTON DISMC15 OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 6 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 RUT AVENUE 1OMMaN VALLEY, CAL. UMA, 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Two Q CONTRACTOR: Ziebarth 6 Amer DATL' August 8, 1990 JOB: GAS HANDLING FMILImrvc AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-1 Schedule Total contract price, less training and field service, of $3,874,632.00 shall be paid in accordance with the follaaing schedule: A. Upon a progression basis, a sum equal to 25 percent of the price of each unit, upon Districts' approval of foundation and general arrangement drawings and receipt of written certification fron supplier of the ccm=euuent of manufacture of each unit, for a total sum not to exceed $968,658.00, said am to be paid within 30 days thereafter. B. Upon Districts' receiving written certification from supplier of rough stock major components of each unit being on-site at supplier's manufacturing site, a total amnot to exceed $968,658.00, said sum to be paid within 30 days thereafter. (Rough stack includes compressor frame, cylinders, crankshaft, heads and pistons.) C. Upon coupletion of machining of nmjor components of each unit. Total sum not to exceed $968,658.00, said sum to be paid within 30 days thereafter. D. Upon delivery of each finished c®pressor set at Districts' plant, a a= equal to 25 percent of the price of each unit, for a total sum not to exceed $968,658.00. The contract-specified retention amount for Package P1 c®pressors shall be held in accordance with the original contract doctments. The contract-specified retention amount for Package P2 compressors shall be released within 90 days of the acceptance of the compressors by the Districts, in good condition, at the Districts' Plant No. 2. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER rIEM: ($ 5,000.00) Tim ExTEMION THIS CBANLE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "H-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-2" COONry SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 6 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 RLLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CAI.IFORNM 92708 CHANCE ORDER C. 0. NO. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: Ziebarth & A1oer DATE Auaust 8. 1990 JOB: GAS BANf1f.aM FACl7.u= AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-1 Item 2 - 2-1/2-INCH POTABLE WATER SUPPLY PIPE 7O EXISTING CONTROL CENTER AND AREA PAVEMENT The contract documents ,equine that the existing tunnel No. 6 be demolished for the construction of a new tunnel No. 6. The potable water supply to control center was routed through the existing tunnel No. 6 before the tunnel was demolished. This line is not shown on the demolition plan (DWG. 1Y21) which shows the existing Lines entering the tunnel nor is it mentioned in the work sequence specification describing the demolition of tunnel No. 6 (Section 52-1322). A new, potable water supply line was installed from inside Tunnel No. 3 to an existing 2-1/2-inch potable water distribution line located below grade on the Past side of the contol center. The work included rental of steel plates to prevent the disruption of traffic and the replant of pavement removed when installing the line. operations also requested that the area just east of the Resource Management Center be paved to allow traffic to flaw between the Resairce Management Center and Parer Building 3A. This area (approximately 800 square feet) was excavated, 12 inches of base was placed and rued, and 3 inches of pavement was overlayed. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: YCO 3, PCH 8) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 28,165.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 3 - REVISED PRESSURE GAUGE DETAIL The Operations department has requested that all plug valves shown on Typical Detail No. 480, DWG. 1T19, Pressure Gauge Detail, be changed to krill valves (Apollo No. 701050-0). This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 003) DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($ 1,018.00) TIME EXTENSIO1 THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days V� "H-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-3" COUNTY SANrDMON DISTRICTS OF CHANGE CO1NW Page 4 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 RTL AVENUE EVURTAIN VALIM, CAIXFCRNIn 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. TWO (2) CourRACIM: 2iebarth 6 Amer DATE Auaust 8, 1990 JOB: GAS HAND .1NG FACILITIES AT RBCIA!=ON PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-1 Item 4 - REROUTE OF SUMP PUMP DISCHARGE TO PRIMARY SED1MFNrA'n'rON BASINS The contract dmments rape a that the ex� tunnel No. 6 be demolished for the construction of the new tunnel No. 6. The discharge for the sunp pump located in the Digester 5 and 6 gallery Was routed through the existing tunnel No. 6 to a sump in the Control Center basement before the tunnel was demolished. This line is not shown on the DemUtion Plan (DWG. 1Y21) Which shows the existing Lines entering the tunnel nor is it mentioned in the nark sequence specification describing the demolition of tunnel No. 6 (Section 52-1322) . The new 2-inch PVC line was routed through tunnel No. 8 to the drainage sump located in the pipe gallery at the south end of the Primary Sedimentation Basins 1 and _ 2. This it® of work was accouplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: ELO 2) `ark ADDED COST THIS CHANGE CIDER ITEM: $ 1,614.00 ME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 5 - DEC] OF MISCELLANEOUS YARD PIPING The Contractor was directed to remove an abandoned 36-inch reinforced concrete pipe and three abandoned, concrete encased 15-inch VCP sewers. These undisclosed utilities were encountered during the excavation of Power Building No. 5 and tunnel No. 4. They were removed to the limits of structural excavation and plugged. The lines had been abandoned prior to this project. This work was not included on the General Demolition plan (lY09) . This item of work was acca%Aished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)3 of the General Provisions. (Reference: FM 4) ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: $ 9,619.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "H-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-4" COL= SANITATION DLSMCTS OF CHANGE COURN Page 5 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10044 ET-1 AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALTEY, CAti U3NIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: Ziebartb & Alper DATE August 8, 1990 JOB: GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-1 Item 6 - COLOR CODING OF PLANT WATER, INDUSTRIAL WATER, AND POTABLE WATER LINES Plant 1 presently has a city crater system and a plant water system. The city water system i being modified in this project and the P1-34-2 project to consist of a potable water system and an industrial water system. The contract currently specifies that all three of the water systems are to be painted one shade of blue (Standard Specifications Section 29-8) . This item of work designates that the plant water system will be painted blue (DuPont No. 23665 or equal) and the industrial water system will be painted storm blue (DuPont No. 67999 or equal) . The potable water system will be painted sour grape purple (Tnemec No. EP14 or equal). The added cost for this item is for the coat of the paint pigments, sorting of the different sizes and types of pipe for painting the different systems, and hand painting the pipe that has been installed in the tunnels. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to `✓ Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,229.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 35,609.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSICN THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no tine is required for this Change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change order. "H-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-5" COCIM SANnTAT CN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 6 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 RI.T.TC AVENUE FLXNnV N VALLEY, CA[= UUA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. 1Wo (2) CONTRACTOR: Ziebarth 6 Aber DATE August 8, 1990 JOB: GAS HANMM4G FACIT•TT ES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. ,LOB NO. P1-34-1 SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date February 27, 1990 Original Contract Tice 730 Calendar Days Original Ccupletion Date Pelxuazy 26, 1992 Time Extension This C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 730 Calendar Days Revised Ccupletion Date February 26, 1992 Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Tice Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 13,098,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 52,748.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 35,609.00 Amended Contract Price $ 13,186,357.00 Beard Authorization Date: August 8, 1990 COL= SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CAI.IFO UM BY: 7¢IDED By. _) - is� 7/7' O Engineer I Date Construction Manager Date BY: AS TO DEvatnr of Engineering Date General Colmeal Date ZIl? AM 6 ALE1 BY3 ca:tracbur Date . "H-6" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-6" RESOLUTION NO. 90-99 ACCEPTING JOB NO. P1-35-1 AS COMPLETE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING JOB NO. P1-35-1 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, S. A. Healy Company & Associates, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Rehabilitation of Digesters 7 and 8 at Plant No. 1, Job No. PI-35-1, on July 18, 1990; and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Director of Engineering has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the `...� terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Rehabilitation of Digesters 7 and B at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-1, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated April 25, 1989; and, Section 4. That the Districts' Director of Engineering is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section S. That the Final Closeout Agreement with S. A. Healy Company & Associates, setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Rehabilitation of Digesters 7 and 8 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-1, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel ; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for Itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 69 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby u authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 8, 1990. "I" AGENDA ITEM ,#9(4) - ALL DISTRICTS "?" RESOLUTION NO. 90-100 , APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 4 TO AGREEMENT WITH MALCOLM PIRNIE INC. RE DESIGN OF JOB 1- 5 P2- 0 P2- A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S. 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 4 TO AGREEMENT WITH MALCOLM PIRNIE, INC. FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES RE JOBS NOS. P1-25, PI-26, P2-32, P2-33 AND P2-34, PROVIDING FOR A REALLOCATION OF COSTS AMONG THE CATEGORIES WITHIN SAID AGREEMENT xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx : : WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. for design of Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-25; Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-26; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33; and Improvements to Grit Facility B, Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure A, Job No. P2-34; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to said agreement provided for additional design and construction services relative to installation of covers on the primary basins, the foul air scrubbing system and modifications to Headworks 8; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 2 to said agreement provided for additional design work to accommodate redesign of the power scrubbers and other miscellaneous work; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 3 provided for additional operator training on the scrubber systems; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend the agreement with Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. to provide for a reallocation of costs among the categories within said agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2. 3, 5, 6, 7, 11. 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 4 dated August 8, 1990, to that certain "J-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-1" agreement dated June 12, 1985, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., for design of Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-25; Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-26; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33; and Improvements to Grit Facility B, Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure A, Job No. P2-34, providing for a reallocation of costs among with categories within said agreement, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That said reallocation of costs shall be as follows and shall not change the maximum authorized compensation of $892,708.00: Existing Change per Amended Agreement Addendum No. 4 Agreement Professional Services (hourly rates for labor `✓ erhead at 161%) notstovexceed ........: $742,560.00 $4,622.00 $747,182.00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed ............ 75,885.00 (4,622.00) 71,263.00 Fixed Profit .............. 74,263.00 -0- 74,263.00 TOTAL COMPENSATION AUTHORIZED, per Agreement and Addenda Nos. 1 through 4, inclusive .............. $892,708.00 -0- $892,708.00 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 4 in form approved by the General Counsel . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 8, 1990. "J-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-2" `nn,,.ngye, �., COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ' OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 �✓ y 10844 ELL18.FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 �vb,cW� (714)982-2411 July 25, 1990 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers in Connection with Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33 In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers for Addendum No. 3 for the design of Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. PI-33, on an hourly-rate basis including labor plus overhead, direct `..� expenses and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed $123,400.00. Change Existing per Amended Agreement Addn. No. 3 Agreement Professional Services, (hourly rates including labor plus overhead at 135%) , not to exceed $ 875,759 $150,000 $1,025,759 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 13,582 4,400 17,982 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 80,000 (31,000) 49,000 Fixed Profit 95,159 0 95,159 Total $1,064,500 $123,400 $1,187,900 "K-1" AGENDA ITEM #90 )(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS AI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA Board of Directors July 25, 1990 10Bm EUIS AVENUE y�� >0 BOX ell] Page TWO FOUNTAIN VALLEY CALIFORNIA 9E7284121 71419623411 The Selection Cafmittee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consults . - /s/A. B. Catlin /s/William Mahoney A. B. Catlin William Mahoney Joint Chai_rtBan Vice Joint Cha=*'t*an Selection Ca mittee Selection Ccumittee /s/Thus M. DatLres Th®as M. DI Director of Engineering Selection Coumittee "K-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(1)(1 ) - ALL DISTRICTS ""K-2" RESOLUTION NO. 90-101 ' APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH LEE AND RO CONSULTING OtilfthKb F R DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES RE JOB N . P1- A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH LEE AND RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES RE PRIMARY CLARIFIERS NOS. 6-15 AND RELATED FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-33, PROVIDING FOR ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES, PREPARATION OF AMENDMENT TO 0 & M MANUAL, AND START-UP AND TRAINING SERVICES, AND REDUCING SUBCONSULTANT FEES PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers for design and construction services required for Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 provided for additional services to include modifications to the waste sidestream pump station; revision to the polymer dosing system; inclusion of an Orange County Water District drain line; and relocation of the digester cleaning beds and associated piping; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 2 provided for additional design services for relocation of effluent'junction box and polymer facility, realignment of Fuentes Road, and modifications to the equipment and scum trough hatches on the primary clarifiers; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend the agreement with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers to provide for additional construction support services, preparation of an amendment to the Operations and Maintenance Manual , and start-up and training services, and for a reduction in subconsultant fees previously authorized. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, "L-1" AGENDA ITEM #9( i ) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-1" DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 3 dated August 8, 1990, to that certain Professional Services Agreement dated January 13, 1988, by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers, for design and construction services required for Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33, providing for additional construction support services, preparation of an amendment to the Operations and Maintenance Manual , and start-up and training services, and for a reduction in subconsultant fees previously authorized, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased by an amount not to exceed $123,400.00, as follows, increasing the total authorized compensation from $1.064,500.00 to an amount not to exceed $1,187,900.00: Existing Change per Amended Agreement Addendum No. 3 Agreement Professional Services (hourly rates for labor plus overhead at 135%), not to exceed ............ $ 875,759.00 $150,000.00 $1,025,759.00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed ............. 13,582.00 4,400.00 17,982.00 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed ............. 80,000.00 (31,000.00) 49,000.00 Fixed Profit ............... 95,159.00 -0- 95,159.00 TOTAL COMPENSATION AUTHORIZED, per Agreement and Addenda Nos. 1 through 3, inclusive.............. $1,064,500.00 $123,400.00 $1,187,900.00 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 3 in form approved by the General Counsel . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 8, 1990. "L-2" AGENDA ITEM #90 )(2) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-2" RESOLUTION NO. 90-113-2 AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS AND FILING OF APPLICATION TO LAFCO RE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO DISTRICT NO. ANNEXATION `..� NT.__7Y_-_7RIDER ANNE TION A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS AND REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION TO THE DISTRICT OF TERRITORY KNOWN AS ANNEXATION NO. 72 - TRIDER ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That proceedings are hereby authorized to be initiated by District No. 2, and the Local Agency Formation Commission of Orange County is hereby requested to take proceedings for the annexation of territory designated as "Annexation No. 72 - Trider Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2", the boundaries of which are more particularly described and delineated on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution, according to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth in this resolution in the manner provided by the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985; and, Section 2. That this proposal is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Division 3, commencing with Section 56000 of the California Government Code; and, Section 3. That this application is for the purpose of annexing approximately 6.687 acres of territory to District No. 2 in the vicinity of Sycamore Street and Santiago Boulevard in the City of Villa Park, to provide sanitary sewer service to said territory, which said service is not now provided by any public agency, as requested by Trider Corporation, owners of said property; and, "M-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(o) - DISTRICT 2 "M-1" Section 4. That the territory to be annexed is uninhabited; and, Section S. That this proposal is consistent with the adopted sphere of influence of the affected District; and, Section 6. That proposed Annexation No. 72 - Trider Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2 shall be subject to the condition that all fees required to be paid to the District must be satisfied prior to completion of the annexation proceedings; and, Section 7. That the District hereby agrees, pursuant to Section 99.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other affected taxing agencies. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 8, 1990. "M-2' AGENDA ITEM #9(o) - DISTRICT 2 "M-2" COWN SANrTATICN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COWN Page 1 of 5 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 PT.T,TC AVENUE FOUXE7 VA7,I,Ey, CALIFORNIA 92708 �as� CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Two (2) CONIRACTOR: EENEO, INC. , doe MC GRAND 6 ASSOCIATES DATE August 8, 1990 JOB: Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 2, Contract No. 5-34-2 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (D®duct) $ 28,803.00 In accordance with contract previsions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as covpensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 REMOVAL OF ASPHALTIC CONCRETE OVER ONE MNNHO1E The Contractor was directed to remove asphaltic concrete over existing manhole No. A located at Station No. 0+18 (see Sheet 27A of the contract plans for Contract No. 5-34-1). The exact location of the manhole was needed to position the boring for the 66-inch casing constructed under Pacific Coast Highway. This is a reimbursable item by Mobil Oil Company. This item was acccuplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(B) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 346.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 REMOVAL OF ASPHALTIC CONCRETE OVER TWO mmmm= The Contractor was directed to remove asphaltic concrete over two existing manholes to allow OCSD maintenance crews access to clean the manholes. The nanholes are located at Station Nos. D+00 and 0+18 (see Sheet 27A of the contract plans for Contract No. 5-34-1). It was discovered that a blockage existed in the 42-inch sewer line between the two manholes consisting of chunks of asphaltic concrete and grit which got into the line during earlier construction at the site by the City of Newport Beach. This item is reimbursable by Mobil Oil Company. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,069.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Day "N-1" AGENDA ITEM #90) - DISTRICT 5 "N-1" COUNTY SANIMION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 5 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 TuTT.Tr. AVENUE FDIEIPAIN VALLEY, CAIZFUUM 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. 140. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: KE W, INC.. dba MC GRAND & ASSOCIATES DATE Aucust 8, 1990 JOB: Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 2, Contract No. 5-34-2 Item 3 TRAFFIC CONTROL AND RAISING MAC TO GRADE The Contractor was directed to provide traffic control at the intersection of Bayside Drive and Pacific Coast Highway while one manhole at Station No. 0+18 was expoaed and raised to grade (see Sheet 27A of the contract plans for Contract No. 5-34-1) . Raising this manhole to grade was not included in the project specifications for Contract No. 5-34-2 and, therefore, is extra work. This is a reimbursable item by Mobil Oil Company. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,218.00 TIME EXTINSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Day �. Item 4 TRAFFIC CONTROL, RENDVE BORE PIT SHIELD, paCUUTT•, PAVE ADID REPAIR WATER T , NOT AS SHOWN ON PLANS The Contractor was directed to provide traffic control at the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway and Bayside Drive and remove the bore pit shield, backfill and place temporary asphaltic concrete between Station Nos. 9+90 and 10+20 (see Sheet 2 of the contract plans for Contract No. 5-34-2). Traffic control consisted of closing the right hand turn lane from Pacific Coast Highway to Bayside Drive; the No. 1 lane from Bayside Drive to westbound Pacific Coast Highway; and lane No. 3 of the eastbound Pacific Coast Highway. The contract documents indicate a certain amount of traffic control; however, this is in addition to that required in the contract documents. The Contractor damaged an 8-inch water line shown incorrectly on the contract plans which interfered with the excavation for the porposed 72-inch manhole. The Contractor was directed to repair the damaged waterline at Station No. 10+13. This is a reimbursable item by Mobil Oil Company. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER I'g;M: $ 6,237.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Day "N-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(p) - DISTRICT 5 "N-2" CO[PIIR SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTr -Page 3 of 5 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ATT.TC AVENUE FOUMIREN VALUM, CALnUUM 92708 CHANCE ORDER C. 0. NO. Two (2) Off: EENXO. INC., dba MC GRAND & ASSOCIATES GATE August 8, 1990 JOB: Imomvarents to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 2, Contract No. 5-34-2 Item 5 POTHOLE EXISTING WATER AND SEWER IMM NOT AS SHM ON PLANS The Contractor was requested by the project designers (Robert Bein & Frost; R.B.F. ), to pothole and survey an existing City of Newport Beach 8-inch water Line and a 21-inch sewer line not as shown on plans at Station No. 10+13 (see Sheet 2 of the contract plans for Contract No. 5-34-2). The designers requested extra potholing beyond that provided for in the contract to verify the location and elevation of the 21-inch vitrified clay pipe and to further survey the location of the 8-inch water line to avoid future damage. The water (see Item 4) and sewer lines interfered with the proposed location of the 72-inch manhole. This is a reimbursable item by Mobil Oil Ccapany. This item was accouplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: $ 459.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHUM ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 6 POTHOLE EXISTING F@'LERR AND SEWER IMM NOT AS SHOW ON PIANS The Contractor was requested by the project designers (R.B.F.), to pothole and survey existing City of Newport Beach 24-inch and 18-inch water lines not as shown on plans at Station No. 16+00 and Station No. 17+20 (see Sheet 3 of the contract plans for Contract No. 5-34-2). Potholing provided for in the contract determined that both water lines interfered with the excavation for the proposed 36-inch sewer. Additional potholing was performed at the request of R.H.F. to verify angle points, lengths and depths for future relocation of the water lines. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 16,474.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 3 Calendar Day TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 28,803.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER: 6 Calendar Days "N-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(p) - DISTRICT 5 "N-3" COUNTY SATnmMCN DISTRICTS CF ORAL COONi7 Page 4 of 5 �J P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 FTr.TS AVRNOE FOCUTAIN VALLEY, CAT•TFCRNTA 92708 CHANGB ORDER C. O. NO. Mon (21 CONTRACTOR: EENRO. INC., dba NC GRAND & ASSOCIATES DATE August 8, 1990 JOB: Inprovenants to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 2, Contract No. 5-34-2 The additional Work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime Work and within the time allotted for the oringinal Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 6 days' extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been cr will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIM Original Contract Date February 21, 1990 Original Contract Tyre 210 Calendar Days Original Ccupletiou Date September 18, 1990 Time Extension this C.O. 6 Calendar Days Total Contract Tice Extension 6 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 216 Calendar Days Revised Final Ca:pletion Due Date September 24, 1990 Actual Final Cw�pletion Date Not Applicable Time Subject to Liqudated Damages Not Applicable Original Contract Prim $_1,959,690.00 Prev. Auth. Changes 495,775.00 This Change (Add) (Daduck) 28,803.00 Amended Contract Price 2,484,268.00 "N-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(p) - DISTRICT 5 "N-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 FrT S AVENUE j F.'ANl'AIN VALLEY, 09MEORNIA 92708 �as� CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Tao (2) CONnU CTOR: KENKO. INC.. dba M GRAND & ASSOCIATES DATE August 8, 1990 JOB: I=roven�is to Bayside Drive Tmink Sewer, Phase 2, Contract No. 5-34-2 Board Authorization Date: August 8, 1990 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUUEAITTED BY: y (� EMED BY: Engineer Date C&wUimtim Manager Date %BY: AP WED AS TO � RP4: L ,2L 4a of ineeting Date General Counsel Date XEM INC., dba NC GRAND & ASSOCIATES ACCEPTED BY: Contractor �— +lltc—i', 'Date "N-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(p) - DISTRICT 5 "N-5" RESOLUTION NO. 90-114-6 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH THE COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT AND HE D A AL DISTRICT TRANSFERRING OWNERSHIP OF SEWERS WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE ORANGE COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, TRANSFERRING OWNERSHIP OF SEWERS AND EASEMENTS WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE ORANGE COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS TO THE COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT AND THE 32NO AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx WHEREAS, District No. 6 is the owner of certain property, easements and sewerage facilities granted to it September 6, 1955, by Deed from the United States of America; and, WHEREAS, said sewer facilities are located on the former Santa Ana Army Air Base and are within the area served by the Costa Mesa Sanitary District; and, WHEREAS, District No. 6, by lease dated November 23, 1960, leased portions of said property, easements and sewerage facilities to the Costa Mesa Sanitary District; and, WHEREAS, portions of said sewer facilities, and other sewer facilities constructed by the Sanitation District and shown on a Record of Survey, are located within the Orange County Fairgrounds, which are owned by the 32nd Agricultural District; and, WHEREAS, the parties now desire to have portions of said property, easements and sewerage facilities transferred to the Costa Mesa Sanitary District and the 32nd Agricultural District; portions retained by District No. 6; and portions abandoned by the District No. 6. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, \.J 110-11, AGENDA ITEM #9(q) - DISTRICT 6 110-11, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Agreement dated June 28, 1990, by and between County Sanitation District No. 6, the Costa Mesa Sanitary District and the 32nd Agricultural District, providing for the transfer and/or abandonment of certain sewers and easements located within and adjacent to the Orange County Fairgrounds, more particularly shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto, from District No. 6 to the Costa Mesa Sanitary District and the 32nd Agricultural District, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the transfer of ownership of said sewers and easements shall be at no cost to the Sanitary District nor the Agricultural District; and, - Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 8, 1990. �a.✓ "0-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(q) - DISTRICT 6 "0-2" EXHIBIT "A" e{gKCFt STREET FUl'URE CONTRACT NO. G-l2 CC16ST COLLEGE ' I -I� �v 1 AmL/,v&YON Cl2 � Q i1I� NO SCALE COUNTY FA/RG,000NOS Gr 60004_SE4/ERS 105ASEMEN72S 7p gErMANSFFRREO = Q? MESA Snu/rMY a'T. 4#e44B*1CN7S 710,QE,4A/N VNOER SAN/- TAr/aV4WSr OWNERaAVP, �IUOI�ImNI-SEWERS, EASEMENT$ d CMSE) 7O CONNSCT _ PROPERP/ 70 SE AS"- 7D EX/ST/NG CJMSM L!/JE Z)a%M ar SLV/rAT/Ov ZvIr '-SEi jZR S, EASEMENTS PROPERTY 70 B¢ rXQ S- FER,eeo 7D 92'Xy AaPJ- CULTURAL O/ST.a/Cl. AGREEMENT 6ETWEFN C_ OUN7y SAN/7''lT10N 0/5TRICT No G OF ORAMGE GO 1=;, COSTA MESA SAN/TQRY O/STR/CT AND 32 nd AGRlCUL7UR.AL D/57AZ/C7. /0-25-8g "0 3" AGENDA ITEM #9(q) - DISTRICT 6 "0-3" CO@IIR SANITAITCN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNrY Page 1 of 6 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 PET IS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction Co. DATE August 8, 1990 JOB: Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road Contract No. 14-1-1B Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduat) $ 94,697.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - DECAY DUE TO EXISTING TELEPHONE CABLE NOT AS SHOWN ON PLANS The telephone cable at Station No. 147+78 was damaged during installation of the steel casing for the 15-inch vitrified clay pipe (see Sheet 4 of the contract plans) . This cable interfered with the designed grade of the casing and is shown incorrectly on the contract plans. The Contractor was directed to place his labor and equipment on standby until the cable could be repaired by Pacific Bell. The Contractor was then required to adjust the boring equipment to preclude the interference. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(B) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,564.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - POTHOLE EXISTING TELEPHONE CONDUITH The Contractor was directed to pothole and survey the location and.depth of the existing telephone conduits between Station Nos. 146+70 and 14M5 (see Sheet 4 of the contract plans) over the proposed 81-inch reinforced concrete pipe. This potholing was performed beyond that required in the contract specifications because the conduits were not as shown in the contract plans. The contractor had previously potholed for the conduits per the contract documents. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(B) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 719.00 TIME EXTENSSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Nays "P-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(r) - DISTRICTS 7 & 14 "P-1" COlIITTY SANrTATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 6 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ECX.TC AVENUE FURMLIN VALLEY, CALMPNI 1 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction Co. DATE Auwst 8, 1990 JOB: Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road Contract No. 14-1-IB Item 3 - R04MI IZE FROM STATION NO. 217+30 TO STATION NO. 208+00 The Contractor was directed to relocate the start of construction from the specified starting paint at Station No. 217+30 to Station No. 208+00 (see Sheet 11 of the contract plans). Existing television cable was to be relocated by others prior to construction; however, the cable was not relocated at this time. The Contractor was on standby a portion of one day during remobilization of labor and equipment. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(B) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,338.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 - WIIiEM'AVATION OF SUB-BASE MAMUA : FOR THE CITY OF COSTA MESA The Contractor was directed to overew:avate saturated sub-base material to a depth of 4 to 5 feet and to replace it with crushed miscellaneous base between City of Costa Mesa Station Nos. 27+50 and 42+5 (see Sheet Nos. 5 through 7 of the contract plans). The City of Costa Mesa requester) that we have the Contractor perform this added work for street improvements. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(B) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEN: $ 54,468.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 5 - EX MMIG EDISON VAULT NOT AS SHOWN ON PLANS The Contractor encountered an Edison electric vault which encroached into the Limits of the excavation of the proposed 10-inch sewer at Station Nos. 203+30 and 210+10 (see Sheets 10 and 11 of the contract plans) . The Contractor was directed to install a 10-inch PVC sewer Line around the vault. This item of work was accognlished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(B) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: - $ 8,902.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "P-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(r) - DISTRICTS 7 & 14 "P-2" COUNTY SAN MICN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 6 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 EC.LIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Two f21 COMMA=: Steve Bubalo Construction Co. DATE August 8, 1990 JOB: Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road Contract No. 14-1-IB Item 6 - CONNECT SEWER r.nawmaL The Contractor encountered a sewer lateral at Station No. 200+60 which was enclosed in steel casing (see Sheet 10 of the contract plans). The steel casing of the sewer lateral was undisclosed in the contract plans. The Contractor was directed to cut and reeve the steel casing to connect the lateral to the 10-inch sewer. This item of work was accapplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(B) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 549.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 7 - 4-INCH GAS r•,rn. NUT LOCATED AS SHOWN AND UNDISCLOSED UTILITY The Contractor encountered an existing 4-inch gas line located in the limits of the excavation of the proposed 10-inch sewer between Station Nos. 216+75 and 214+90 and an undisclosed 22-inch water line crossing the excavation at Station No. 216+75 (see Sheet 11 of the contract plans). The Contractor was directed to make necessary repairs and excavate around the utilities. This item was accanplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(B) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER MEM: $ 11,213.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 8 - RKLOCATE SEWER LATERAL The Contractor encountered a sewer lateral connection at Station No. 189+73 located above the 84-inch pipe (see Sheet 8 of the contract plans) . The Contractor was directed to remove and relocate 32 feet of the sewer lateral in older to provide sufficient slope to connect to the new manhole serving the 84-inch pipe. This item was accaplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(B) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER =: $ 1,280.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "P-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(r) - DISTRICTS 7 & 14 "P-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 6 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELL IS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CAT.TFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction Co. DATE August 8, 1990 JOB: Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road Contract No. 14-1-1B Item 9 - CONNECT SEWER I,AIERA . AND UNDISCLOSED UTILITY The Contractor encountered a sewer lateral which was encased in steel casing and an undisclosed gas line at Station No. 200+60 (see Sheet 10 of the contract plans) . The steel casing of the sewer lateral was undisclosed in the contract plans. The Contractor was directed to excavate around the undisclosed utility and to cut and remove the steel casing to connect the lateral to the 10-inch sewer. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account puruant to Section 10-6(b)2(B) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,455.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days .� Item 10 - UNDISCLOSED UTILITIES The Contractor encountered several undisclosed utilities at various locations while excavating the new sewer line. The Contractor was directed to investigate and excavate around the undisclosed utilities and to make the necessary repairs. Following is a tabulation of the additional work: Location (Station No.) Sheet No. Unlit Amount 196+55 9 18" storm drain $ 2,506.00 202+14 10 2" electrical conduit 1,248.00 203+38 10 2" water line 1,504.00 203+99 10 1" gas line 1,504.00 217+30 11 2" electric conduit 337.00 192+90 9 48" storm drain 110.00 This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(B) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 7,209.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHAIN ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 94,697.00 TOTAL TINE EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days "P-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(r) - DISTRICTS 7 & 14 "P-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELiSS AVENUE 1 / FOUNnUN VALLEY, CMZFCF M 92708 t,.y CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. TWO (2) CONfRACIOR: Steve Bubalo Construction Co. DATE August 8, 1990 JOB: Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road Contract No. 14-1-1B The additional work contained within this Change Order can be perforned incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore +mrtuammy agreed that no time is required for this Change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SMOG RY OF CONPRACT TIME Original Contract Date September 20, 1989 Original Contract Time 360 Calendar Days Original Carpletion Date September 14, 1990 1 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 360 Calendar Days Revised Camioletion Date September 14, 1990 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 5,345,523.30 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 42,572.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 94,697.00 Amended Contract Price $ 5,482,792.30 "P-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(r) - DISTRICTS 7 & 14 "P-5" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 6 of 6 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 r-TT AVENUE �.� FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction Co. DATE August 8, 1990 JOB: Baker-Gisler Interceotor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road Contract No. 14-1-1B Board Authorization Date: August 8, 1990 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIaUM SUBMITTED BY: RECOMMENDED BY: l l -7o F- Engineer Date Manager Date BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: hector of Engineering Date General Cdmsel Date STEVE BUBATA CONSTRUCTION CO. ACCEPTED BY: 7 9U' Contractor Date "P-6" AGENDA ITEM #9(r) - DISTRICTS 7 & 14 "P-6" COUNTY SANI CNN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 RMTc AVENUE FOMMLIN VALLEY, CALIFCRNIA 92708 CEANGS ORDER C. 0. NO. IGo (2) CONTRACTOR: Colich & Some (JV1 DATE Aucust 8. 1990 JOB ABANDONMENT OF LANE ROAD PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 7-11-1 AND ABANDON= OF CASTLE ROCK AND DOW AVENUE PUMP STATIONS AND MODIFICATIONS TO MACAHIROR PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 7-11-3 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 24,319.00 In accordance with contrdat provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby an+harIzed and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - CSANGGHD CONDITIONS The Contractor was directed to remove excess concrete encountered at the base of manholes at Station Nos. 9+86 and 2+51 to construct new 60-inch manholes and connect 8-inch vitrified clay pipe (see Sheets 5 and 6 of 12 sheets by Boyle Engineering Corporation dated 11-89). This item was acca:plished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,301.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Day Item 2 - CO>E'LICT WITH EXISTING SEkM I AND LATERAL The Contractor discovered that the existing 12-inch sewer Line and a 6-inch lateral at Station No. 20+90 have been backfil ed with high cement content slurry. The Contractor was directed to remove and dispose of the slurry and to import granular backfill material to install new 6-inch lateral (see Sheet 6 of the contract plans). This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS C192M ORDER ITEM: $ 1,458.00 TIME h'OMBICN THIS CHANGE ORDER ITM: 0 Calendar Days Item 3 - RELOCATE SEWER LATERAL The Contractor encountered a sewer lateral connection at Station No. 17+96 located below the new 15-inch sewer line (see Sheet 6 of the contract plans). The Contractor was directed to remove and relocate 40 feet of the sewer lateral to provide sufficient slope to the 15-inch pipe. This item was aoccupLished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. Alm COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,749.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CMUM DRUM 1T1L 2 Calendar Days "�-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(t) - DISTRICT 7 "0-1" Cry SANITATION DISTRICTS OF CHANCE COLUM Page 2 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 PALLS AVENUE FaRMIN VALLEY, alllKNUA 92708 CHANCE ORDER C. O. NO. TWO (21 CC,I?rFACIOR: Colich & Sons (JV) DATE August 8, 1990 JOB: ABANIDONNffi3T OF LANE ROAD FUNP STATION, CCRPTRACT NO. 7-11-1 AND ABADMON I E OF CASTLEROCR AND DOW AVENUE PUNP STATIONS AND MODIFICATIONS TO MACAKCH[II1 PUMP STATION, CONTRACT M. 7-11-3 Item 4 - UDMISCTASED SEWER LATERAL An undisclosed 6-inch sewer lateral was encountered at Station 14+85 (see Sheet 5 of the contract plans) . The sewer lateral could not be connected to the new sewer at Station No. 14+85 1'=-_=ause of numerous utilities in the iavediate vicinity located at the same elevation. The Contractor was directed to reroute the lateral parallel to Dow Avenue and connect it to the new 12-inch sewer line at Station No. 15+25. Two clean-cuts also had to be constructed in conjunction with the sewer lateral connection. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 13,811.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 4 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 24,319.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 7 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the tun allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 7 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, kart that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. "Q-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(t) - DISTRICT 7 "Q-z" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 PIT AVENUE FO[mnun VALIEY, CALTEO NIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Two (2) CONPRAC1t7R: Colich & Sons QV) DATE Ancuat 8. 1990 JOE: ABANDONMENT OF LANE ROAD POND STATION, CONTRACT NO. 7-11-1 AND ABANDCRIENT OF CASTIBRO iC AND DOW AVENUE PUMP STATIONS AND MODIFICATIONS TO MACARTHOA POMP STATION, CONTRACT N0. 7-11-3 SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date January 30, 1990 Original Contract Tine 120 Calendar Days Original Completion Date May 29, 1990 Time Extension this C.O. 7 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 13 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 133 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date June 11, 1990 Actual Final Canpletion Date Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 1,277,212.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 27,913.00 This Change (Add) (Aedmt) $ 24,319.00 Amended Contract Price $ 1,329,444.00 Board Authorization Date: August 8, 1990 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUMMP�ITED BY: p �Q BY: 1 !-, j� -1 l_�a 0� I 70 7-/7 YO Engineer � Construction Date AS ri a J-/7�r/ r71az� ✓ � Director o Eigineering Date General Co el Date CULSCH & SONS (JV) BY: 2 - 0 Contractor Date "Q-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(t) - DISTRICT 7 "Q-3" RESOLUTION NO. 90- ESTABLISHING USE CHARGES FOR 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. ...� A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING USE CHARGES FOR CLASS I, CLASS II AND CLASS III PERMITTEES FOR THE 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. _ WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has heretofore adopted Ordinance No. an Ordinance Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities; and, WHEREAS, said Ordinance provides that the Board of Directors shall annually adopt a charge for use of District facilities by Class I , Class II and Class III permittees. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That pursuant to Sections 302.6 and 303.6 of Ordinance No. the 1990-91 fiscal year charges for use for Class I and Class II permittees are hereby established as follows: For Flow: $_ per million gallons of flow For Suspended Solids: $ per thousand pounds of S.S. For Biochemical Oxygen Demand: $_ per thousand pounds of B.O.D. Section 2. That pursuant to Section 304.6 of Ordinance No. , the 1990-91 fiscal year charge for use for Class III permittees is hereby established as follows: For Flow: $ per million gallons of flow PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 8, 1990. "R" AGENDA ITEM #11 - ALL DISTRICTS "R" RESOLUTION NO. 90-111 DESIGNATING AND APPOINTING MERRILL LYNCH CAPITAL MARKETS AS THE SENIOR MANAGER UNDERWRITER FOR HE DISTRICTS' PROPOSED LONG-TERM SECURITIES DEBT ISSUE PR RAM A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING AND APPOINTING MERRILL LYNCH CAPITAL MARKETS AS THE SENIOR MANAGER/UNDERWRITER FOR THE DISTRICTS' PROPOSED LONG-TERM SECURITIES DEBT ISSUE PROGRAM : xxzzzzzxxxxzxzzzzz WHEREAS, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, on July 19, 1989, adopted the 30-year Master Plan of needed capital facilities entitled "Collection. Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan"; and, WHEREAS, said Master Plan will require extensive funds to pay for the design and construction of said sewerage facilities; and, WHEREAS, the financial requirements to complete the capital facilities projects have been studied and recommendations made in Volume 8 of said Master Plan entitled "Financial Plan"; and, WHEREAS, the Districts have determined that it will be necessary to issue long-tern debt obligations/securities in order to raise the necessary funds to pay for the capital facilities projects; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to action of the Boards of Directors on March 14, 1990, the Districts have requested proposals from five (5) major financial underwriters/investment banking firms to provide necessary services to the Districts in developing and implementing its Financial Plan of the Master Plan, and specifically to act as the Senior Manager/Underwriter for long-term securities debt obligation issues of the Districts; and, WHEREAS, the Districts have received proposals from five major firms in response to the Districts' request, and the Districts have evaluated said proposals and interviewed the responsible personnel from each firm; and, WHEREAS, the Districts have determined several proposals to be "S-1" AGENDA ITEM #14(b) (1)(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "S-1" satisfactory for the Districts' needs, with the proposal of Merrill Lynch Capital Markets to be the apparent best for the Districts. �../ NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S. 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: The Districts hereby designate and appoint the firm of Merrill Lynch Capital Markets to act as the Senior Manager/Underwriter for the forthcoming long-term securities debt issue program of the Districts, in accordance with specific terms and conditions concerning the obligation to purchase the Districts' issued securities as will be negotiated and agreed to prior to the sale and purchase; and, Section 2: The Districts reserve the right, at their sole discretion, to designate and appoint one or more additional firms to act as co-Managers with Merrill Lynch Capital Markets in the first or any succeeding issues in which Merrill Lynch Capital Markets acts as Senior Manager/Underwriter; and, Section 3: The Districts reserve the right to terminate the appointment of Merrill Lynch Capital Markets at any time upon the Districts' sole determination that such action is in its best interests. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 8, 1990. "S-2" AGENDA ITEM #14(b) (1)(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "S-2" RESOLUTION NO. 90-112 APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE LAW FIRMS OF MUD GE ROSE GUTHRIE ALEXANDER 8 FEROON AND ROURKE & WOODRUFF TO SERVE AS THE DISTRICTS' CO-BOND COUNSEL A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE LAW FIRMS OF MUDGE ROSE GUTHRIE ALEXANDER 8 FEROON AND ROURKE 8 WOODRUFF TO SERVE AS CO-BOND COUNSEL FOR THE DISTRICTS' PROPOSED LONG-TERM SECURITIES DEBT ISSUE PROGRAM WHEREAS, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, pursuant to financial needs and requirements described in its Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan adopted July 19, 1989, have determined to issue long-term debt obligations/securities to obtain the necessary funds to complete the development of its needed capital facilities; and, WHEREAS, in conjunction with the selection and appointment of a Senior Manager/Underwriter to develop the necessary plan for issuance of long-term debt obligations/securities, specially qualified legal counsel is needed to assist the Districts' General Counsel for the preparation and completion of said program; and, WHEREAS, the Districts have considered several well qualified legal firms to serve as their Bond Counsel. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That the firm of Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander 8 Ferdon is hereby appointed and designated as co-Bond Counsel , together with the firm of Rourke 8 Woodruff, for the forthcoming long-term securities and debt issue program; and, "T-1" AGENDA ITEM #14(b) (ll (b) - ALL DISTRICTS "T-1" Section 2: The terms and conditions of that certain letter agreement dated July 11, 1990 from Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander & Ferdon and Rourke & �../ Woodruff are hereby approved, and the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute same on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 8, 1990. "T-2" AGENDA ITEM #14(b) (1)(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "T-2" INITIAL STUDY I. Background A. Name of Proponent: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County B. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: Telephone (714) 962-2411. 10844 Ellis Avenue (P. 0. Box 8127) Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 C. Contact Person: Thomas M. Dawes, Director or Engineering D. Title and Location of Project: Draft Supplement No. 1 to Final Program Environmental Impact Report on Collection, Treatment, and Disposal Facilities Master Plan Addressing Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Sob No. I-9. E. Description of Project: Additional study to assess impacts associated with construction of a new interplant effluent conveyance pipeline and utility corridor to increase capacity for effluent disposal and utility and communication reliability as set forth in the 1989 Master Plan. Facilities will be constructed within a 30-foot-wide easement adjacent to the Santa Ana River between Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley and Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach. Coordination with the County of Orange and Corps of Engineers for the Santa Ana Mainstem Flood Control Project and locally planned transportation improvement projects will be of key importance. New facilities will parallel and, in some instances, replace existing facilities and will not disturb previously undisturbed areas. 1 "U-i" AGENDA ITEM #15(h) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-1" II. Guidelines A. Does the proposed activity qualify as a project as defined in Section 28. Yes XX No (If activity does not qualify as project, do not complete remainder of form.) A B. Does the project qualify as: .. 1. Ministerial (Section 6) Yes No XX 2. Emergency (Section 13) Yes No M_ 3. A feasibility or planning study (Section 33) Yes _ No 4. Categorically exempt pursuant to Article 8 of the State Guidelines (Section 40) Yes _ No _XX_ 5. Involves another agency which constitutes the lead agency (Section 36) Yes _ No XX If yes, identify lead agency: (If yes has been checked for any of the above, an Environmental Impact Assessment/Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration need not be prepared.) �✓ III. Environmental Impacts (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) Yes Maybe No A. Earth. Will the proposal result in: 1. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geological substructures? X_ 2. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or uncovering of the soil? X_ 3. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X_ 4. The destruction, covering or modifica- tion of any unique geologic or physical features? X 5. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X 2 "U-2" AGENDA ITEM #15(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-2" Yes Maybe No . 6. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the �►� bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? _ _ X 7. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? X B. Air. Will the proposal result in: 1. Substantial air emissions or deterior- ation of ambient air quality? X_ 2. The creation of objectionable odors? _X 3. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? _X C. Water. Will the proposal result in: 1. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X 2. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? X 3. Alteration to the course or flow of flood waters? X 4. Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water? X 5. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? _X_ 6.- Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of groundwaters? _X_ 7. Change in the quantity of groundwaters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? _X_ 8. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? _X_ sari 3 "U-3" AGENDA ITEM #15(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-3" a c . Yes Maybe No 9. Exposure of people or property to .water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? X D. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: 1. Change in diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants? _ _ X_ 2. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? 3. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the nor- mal replenishment of existing species? X 4. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? _ _ _X_ E. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: 1. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? X_ 2. Reduction of the numbers or any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? _ _ _X_ 3. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? 4. Deterioration to existing fish or wild- life habitat? F. Noise. Will the proposal result in: 1. Increases in existing noise levels? 2. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? _X C. Light and Clare. Will the proposal produce light or glare? _ _ X H. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X 4 "IJ-4" AGENDA ITEM #15(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-4" Yes Maybe No I. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: 1. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? _ _ X 2. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X J. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: 1. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? _X 2. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation Plan? _ _ X X. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? —X L. Housing. Will the proposal affect exist- ing housing, or create a demand for addi- tional housing? X H. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: 1. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X 2. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? _X 3. Substantial impact upon existing trans- portation systems? X 4. Alterations to present patterns of cir- culation or movement of people and/or goods? X 5. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X 6. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? _X 1 ' 5 "U-5" AGENDA ITEM #15(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-5" Yes Maybe No N. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new \.WV or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: 1. Fire protection? 2. Police protection? X A 3. Schools? X 4. Parks or other recreational facilities? X S. Maintenance of public facilities, in- cluding roads? X 6. Other governmental services? X 0. Energy. Will the proposal result in: 1. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? _ _ X 2. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? _ _ X_ P. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alter- ations to the following utilities: 1. Power or natural gas? X 2. Communications systems? X 3. Water? X 4. Sewer or septic tanks? X 5. Storm water drainage? _X_ 6. Solid waste and disposal? _X Q. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: 1. Creation of any health hazard or poten- tial health hazard (excluding mental health)? X 2. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? X 6 "U-5" AGENDA ITEM #15(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-6 Yes Maybe No R. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? _ S. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? l� T. Cultural Resources. 1. Will the proposal result in the alter- ation of or the destruction of a pre- historic or historic archaeological site? 2. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a pre- historic or historic building, structure, or abject? X 3. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? 4. Will the proposal restrict existing re- ligious or sacred uses with the potential 1 / impact area? U. Mandatory Findings of Significance. 1. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of California history or prehistory? _X 2. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well into the future. ) 7 "U-7" AGENDA ITEM #15(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-7" _w Yes Maybe No 3. Does the project have impacts which are individually Limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) X_ 4. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? _ IV. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation See attached sheet. V. Discussion of Zoning Compatibility See attached sheet. VI. Determination On the basis on this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the miti- gation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date: S-30-90 COUNTY SANITAIEON DI TRSTRS LCTS OF ORANGE COUNTYI\ Thomas�M. Dawes Director of Engineering 8 "U-8" AGENDA ITEM #15(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-R" IV. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Explanations of Yes and Maybe Answers) A.2, A.3, A.S. Earth Temporary construction, disruptions and displacements will occur as a result of the installation of the new sewer line and utilities and excavation of old sewer line within the thirty-foot wide easement. Standard construction practices will be used and appropriate mitigation measures instituted to minimize impacts. No significant topographical changes will occur, but there may be a modest change in the level appearance to accommodate a bench of soil overlying the new pipeline. Site specific construction techniques will be developed and described in the EIR and a detailed geotechnical report will be prepared. C.5 Water Proposed facilities will parallel flood control facilities, of the Santa Ana River and involved construction adjoining and into portions of the levee. There may be a need for site dewatering of excavations and this water can be either discharged into a Local sewer line or into the river itself depending upon the quality. Any known surface or subsurface hydrological conditions that could seriously constrain the installation of proposed facilities need to be identified, along with drainage control measures which should be implemented during construction of the proposed facilities. The Districts have a NPDES dewatering permit which applies to dewatering activities and its provisions will be strictly enforced on any contractors. F.1 Noise Noise impacts will be primarily limited to short-term, construction related activities during demolition of an existing 42-inch diameter pipeline and installation of the new 120-inch or 144-inch diameter pipeline and utility facilities. The site specific noise impacts and mitigation measures will be evaluated and addressed in the Supplemental Draft EIR. M.1, M.2, M.3, M.4 Transportation/Circulation There will be a number of pieces of heavy equipment, trucks carrying large pipe to the site, and demolition debris removal, which will entail the movement of vehicles to and from the site via local surface streets and potential use of access routes near residential areas. Staging areas and parking for construction employees will have to be provided on other utility easements in the area. There will be temporary impacts to a few local businesses near the intersection of Victoria/Hamilton Street and Brookhurst that adjoin the Santa Ana River Levee. Portions of the Santa Ana River Levee Bicycle Trail and Equestrian Trail will be temporarily modified during construction. l / 9 "U-9" AGENDA ITEM #15(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-9" ��m r M.1, M.2, M.3, M.4 Transportation/Circulation (Continued) Mitigation measures to diminish the disruption of circulation patterns during construction of the proposed improvements need cc be identified. Activities will be coordinated with the County of Orange and the Corps of Engineers which have other major projects planned in the area. P. Utilities Proposed sewer system improvements and the addition and replacement of existing utility lines owned by the Sanitation Districts are intended to be installed in the close vicinity of numerous utility facilities including natural gas, electricity, water, telephone, cable television and possibly oil lines. Careful coordination with all affected utility purveyors is therefore necessary to prevent damage to those facilities and to prepare for alternate utility delivery systems, if needed, during construction of the proposed relief facilities. The EIR process will include correspondence with affected utility purveyors, to identify possible adverse impacts to utility facilities and mitigation measures therefor. R. Aesthetics This topic needs to be discussed. There will be temporary impacts on local residents from the construction activities which will be in close proximity to three-story apartments and two-story single family homes. In most areas existing fencing will help mitigate any visual impacts. Mitigation measures to replace existing vegetative cover which will be removed will be developed. In the long term, no scenic resources or vistas are likely to be affected by the proposed project. S. Recreation Portions of bikeways along the Santa Ana River will be temporarily disrupted by installation of proposed facilities. Such bikeways must be identified along with mitigation measures to compensate for such temporary impacts. No other recreation area, developed or undeveloped, will be affected by installation of the proposed sewer system improvements. T. Cultural Resources Proposed improvements will be constructed in areas already disturbed or within highly urbanized areas having no known significant cultural resources. V. DISCUSSION OF ZONING COMPATIBILITY Recommended facilities were derived from an analysis of existing system deficiencies with regard to potential growth and development in the Study Area. Growth assumptions were developed from contacts with all affected Planning Agencies to reflect their up-to-date long-term land use plans. Those assumptions have been documented in the Final Master Plan EIR adopted in 1989 and will not be included in this Supplement. 10 "U-10" AGENDA ITEM #15(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-10" COUNTY SANITATIONPISfiyCTS .1 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA April 16, 1990 IWA4¢Us AVENUE A eox 8127 FOUNTYN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 8�E7 VTa9Ezzan ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT A Name of Project: Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9 Location: Within County Sanitation Districts Right-of- WaV between Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant and Huntington Beach Treatment Plants Entity or Person Undertaking Project: A. District: County Sanitation Districts B. Other: Staff Determination: The District's staff, having undertaken and completed an Initial Study of this project in accordance with Section 15063 of the Amendments to the California Environmental Quality Act, for the purpose of ascertaining whether the proposed project might have a significant effect on the environment, has reached the following conclusion: 1. The project will .not have a significant long term effect on the environment because of the mitigation measures incorporated; therefore, a Negative Declaration can be prepared. XX 2. The project could have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, an EIR will be required. _ Date enei V Manager "V" AGENDA ITEM #15(b) - ALL DISTRICTS NV,, -� DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconde and duly carried: Approving -A Agreement bet_jeoZ:oun _ anitation District No. That the Board of Directors hereby Mesa SanitaryDistrict and a nd adopts Resolution No. 90-114-6, strict c or transfer approving Agreement between County of sewers within range ounty Sanitation District No. 6, Costa Mesa Fairgrounds 5anItary District and the 32nd Agricultural District, providing for the transfer of ownership and/or abandonment of sewers and easements within and adjacent to the Orange County Fairgrounds from District No. 6 to the Costa Mesa Sanitary District and the 32nd Agricultural District. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:20 p.m. , August 8, 1990. DISTRICTS 7 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving hange rder No. o he laps and specifications re That Change Order No. 2 to the plans contract No. 14-1-1B and specifications for Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road (and City of Costa Mesa street improvements) , Contract No. 14-1-1B, authorizing an addition of $94,697.00 to the contract with Steve Bubalo Construction Co. for ten items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICTS 7 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive file and den claim Of Kath een antlers re ontract That the claim of Kathleen P. Landers No. 14-1-1B dated June 24, 1990, in the amount of $650.50 for alleged damages to her vehicle incurred in connection with construction of Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road (and City of Costa Mesa street improvements), Contract No. 14-1-1B, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the Districts' General Counsel , liability claims administrator, contractor and contractor's insurance company for appropriate action. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and s ecifications re That Change Order No. 2 to the plans Contract Nos. -11-1 and 7-11- and specifications for Abandonment of Lane Road Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-1, and Abandonment of Castlerock and Dow Avenue Pump Stations and Modifications to MacArthur Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-3, authorizing an addition of $24,319.00 to the contract with Colich 8 Sans (JV) for four items of additional work, and granting a time extension of seven calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:20 p.m. , August 8, 1990. -19- F ` ! 90-426802 • aawtmlD lX araDaa a OIMNOECWNnI.W W1e0�8a •wants RMMARBD BY .Nn Wass xrcDnn® MAxt W. •9Ds PM pVG13'90, County Sanitation Districts .n , of Orange County, California Q• REBpepEA PO Sox 8127 iKEA1pT Fountain Valley, CA 92728-3127 CIM Space AT.-.I ea-only MAIL TAX STATEMUmmO TO: County Sanitation Districts Exempt from Recording Fees of Orange County, California Governmental Acquisition PO Box 8227 Government Coda Section 27383 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 ABBBffi� THZS AGREEMEAT, is made and entered into, to be effective this 1 , day of \%.-�A, 1990, by and between: COUNTY SARITATION DIBTAICT W. a OF CRAMata CDUHTY, -CALI MOm, hereinafter referred to as "Sanitation District";, Com MESA sAHITAHY DIBrsxcS. herein- after referred to as "Sanitary District" AND _ 32M AGRICULTURAL DISTRFCT, hereinafter referred to as "Agricultural District". ARCITALB WBLAEAB, sanitation District is the owner of certain property, easements and sewerage facilities granted to it September a, 2955, by Dead from tie United States of America; and WHEREAS, said sewer facilities are located on the former Santa Ana Army Air Saee and are within the area served by the Costs Mesa Sanitary District; and 1 WSBRBAS, the Sanitation District, by lease dated November 23, 1960, leased portions of Said property, easements and Sewerage facilities to the Sanitary District; and WSmRBAB, portions of said sewer facilities, and other sewer facilities constructed by the Sanitation District and Shown on a Record of Survey, are located on the Orange County Fairgrounds which are owned by the 33;W Agricultural District: and WBRRSAs, the parties now desire -to have portions of Said property, easements and Sewerage facilities transferred to the Sanitary District and the 33nd Agricultural District; portions retained by the Sanitation District; and portions abandoned by the Sanitation District; and WSBRSAS, with Sae exception of one sewer and associated easement, the property, easements and Sewerage facilities referred to in this Agreement are described in a Consent Instrument between the United States of America and County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, recorded Narcb 14, 1961, in Book 5656, Page 306, of Official Records of Orange County, California; and WSSRBAS, the remaining sewer and easement Sc shown in Detail C of the Record of Survey, recorded in Book e9, Page 5, Records of Survey, Orange County Recorder; and WmmReAs, all of such property, easements and sewerage facilities are shown an exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOR, TRSRmPont the parties hereto agree as follows: 2 G • • sA tiara i; . Sanitation District hereby conveys to Sanitary District those portions of the easements, and Sewerage facilities located thereon, described in Consent Instrument between the United States of America and County Sanitation District No. 6 of orange County, California, recorded March 14, 1961, in Back 5656, Page 108, of Official Records of Orange County, California, described as folSawe: ✓ A. That portion of the easement, and sewerage facilities located thereon, described as Pare01.N ' an Page 5 of said . Consent Instrument that is located south of the north boundary of Fair Drive. ✓ B. That portion of the easement, and sewerage facilities located thereon, described as TfLn *-.—T9 on Page 6 of said Consent Instrument that is northerly of Station "E"; ✓C. That portion of the easement, and sewerage facilities located thereon, described as �_3 xo • on Page 6 of said Consent Instrument beginning at Station °E° and Continuing thence East 262.5 feet; J D. That portion of the easement, and sewerage facilities located thereon, described as arc • on Page 6 of said consent Instrument that lies southerly from the first manhole approximately 114 feet northerly of Station "Gat said manhole being shown on a Record of Survey recorded in Book 29, Pages 5 and 6, of Records of Survey, orange County, California, and north of the southerly boundary of Arlington Drive. 3 B. The easement, and sewerage facilities located thereon, described as " on Page 6 of said Consent Instrument. IftsUaa a1 6aweLa end Baeementa td be LraeaCaeraa to the Ramoribed In- Consent Iaatremeht Sanitation District hereby cmrveys to the Agricultural District those portions of the easamente, and sowerage.facilities located thereon, described in co_noant ,jpspsugp�{, betxeen„h�hw United Btatea ,-§pPrf�Pp hnd Cou�ty Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, reco;dad March 16, •1961, in Book 5656, Page I08 of Official Records of Orange County, described As follows: ✓ A. That portion of the easement, and sewerage facilities located thereon, desmribed as Mmel q" of Page 6 of said Consent Instrument that lies southerly of the south boundary of Arlington Drive, except for the southerly 1272.I feet thereof. ✓B. Upon Sanitary District connecting the sewer described in Section lA of this Agreement to the existing Sanitary District line in Fair Drive within the next tan (10) years, Sanitation District Conveys that portion of the easement, and sewerage facilities located thereon, 'described as matcal I" on Page 5 of said Consent Instrument that is located north of the north boundary of Fair Drive to the Agricultural District. aeatiom Ii sewer and Basement to he 7�,faffmd re the Of BUM" V Upon completion of Future Sewer Contract NO. 6-12, as shown on Sxhlbit "A" attached hereto, within the next ten (10)\years, a Sanitation District also conveys to Agricultural District that portion of the easement, and sewerage facilities located thereon, constructed by Sanitation District and described as a 10 foot easement and 16 inch VCP swat line shown in Deta_ i"of no Record of Survey recorded in Book 29, Page 5, Record. of survey, Orange County Recorder. Section a• Owego And samments to Remain under Banitatig • Dietriat ownership Sanitation District shall retain and continue to operate until no longer needed by Sanitation District, those portions of the easements, and sewerage facilities located thereon, described in consent Instrument between the United States of America and County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange county, California, recorded March 14, 1961, in Book 5656, Page DOs, of Official Records of Orange County, California, described as follow.: ,/A. The easement, and sewerage facilities located thereon, described as "Portion of Parcel NO. 3a on Page 9 of said Consent Instrument. Sewers, Basements and Property to be by sanitation pintriat Sanitation District shall conduct proceedings to abandon those portion. of easementsl, sewerage facilities located thereon, and related equipment described in Consent Instrument between the United States of America and County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, recorded Match 14, 1961,.in Book 5656, , Page 308 of Official Records of Orange County, California, described as follows: 5 /A. As easement, and sewerage facilities located thereon, described as "Parcel No. I" on Page S of said Consent Instrument; As. That portion of the easement and sewerage facilities located thereon, described as "Parcel No. an on Page 6 of said Consent Instrument Chet is southerly of Station "E"; /C. That portion of the easement and sewerage facilities located thereon, described as "Parcel No. y" on Page 6 of said Consent Instrument that Comments. 362.5 fast east Of Station •C" and continues to A maMole located APproxlmataly 334 feet north of Station "G", such manhole being shown on the Record of Survey contained in Sock 19, Pages 5 and 6 of Records of Survey, Orange county, California; VD. A sever pump station site, and related facilities, described as "Parcel No. 9" in said Consent Instrument: E. All personal property described in Part III on Page of said Consent Instrument. Section 6; of Oxmitery District and Agticultural District Except as provided in section ], by execution of this Agreement, Sanitary District and Agricultural District hereby accept the transfer of ownership and assume all future responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the sever facilities transferred to them, by Sections 1 through I of this Agreement. Section r; Raccannibilitiea of Sanitation District Sanitation District shall be responsible for the operation and maintenance of the sever facilities retained by it pursuant 6 to Section < of this Agreement and shall also be responsible for the abandonment of no facilities referred to in Section S of this Agreement within a reasonable time after execution of thin Agreement. In addition, Sanitation District shall be responsible for all the operation and maintenance, other than routine maintenance, on sever facilities transferred pursuant to Sections 1 through 1 of this Agreement, for a period of five (S) years from the data of this Agreement. section at AASPet or Claims Sanitation District, Sanitary District and Agricultural District hereby valve all claims and demands against each other for any loss, damage at injury of any kind or character to any person or property, arising from the transfer, retention or abandonment of Saver easements, property and facilities pursuant to this Agreement, except to the extant occasioned by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the parties or their agents or employees. IN NiTNSSS NNNANOP, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. waANITATION DISTRICPe COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT W. a or OAANOY CODMiT, CALIFORNIA ay rsM, arf'of Directors S` �. \Me Sacrotnry, aord of D raee`ora (Signaturas Continued on Page S) APPROVED AS TO PORN. TRONAB L. WOODRDPP DISTRI T COIIRBRL By fl7Xu ^SANITARY DISTRICT^ COSTA MEBA SANITARY DISTRICT ` n Prea den[ ATTE J 88CIet8 y ) APPROVED AS TO FORM By General Counsel eAORICOLTDAAL DIBTAICT-- RAN/D ORICOLT DISTRICT By; W . Pree aant ATT Tt Sec etbry APPROVED AS TO FORM By General Counsel Q\319.Cj 05/11/90 B STATE OF CALIYOANIA 1 ae. COUNTY OF OAANOppEB8�� ply On this � day of CrwvP`L0l1y 19AS, before me, the undersigned, NNot/avryn Pu0}i�and for saTG State, personally appaK FN -w7---= :Sn -R.C�'n?YJ30C_____ and .T. gym..., nw..La..: personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis or evidence) to be the persons who executed the within instrument an Chairman and Secretary, on behalf of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange county, California, and acknowledged to me that County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California executed the within instrument pursuant to its by-laws or a resolution of its Beard of Director.. WITNESS my hand and official seal. ra,amn.r L�wr Not@1] pY C (Seal) STATE OF CALIYOAHIA 1 ) as. COUNTY OF OAANOE ) an this /1S. day of J✓,.V 1989, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public n anT for ea a State, personally appeared fd,n..� x/ _�d°'[R9YrTrur.�ca.w and rwwu ./. O,tew.v. 1'C ✓ personally knmm to me (or pr eat afacleeY-ee4danee) to be no persona who executed the within instrument 99 chairman and Secretary, an behalf of the Costa Hasa Sanitary District, and acknowledged to me that Costa Mesa Sanitary District executed the within instrument pursuant to its by-law. or a'resolution of its Board of Directors. WITNESS my hand and official seal. No:a J :P. < ta. Notary Publ c (Seal) pa C�gLSGL naan.nmsrib fO C"'. Wmwm W............f STATE OP CALIFORNIA ) e4 COUNTY or OAJ11108 ) On this 29 day Of June, 1990 x=ggg, before me, the undersigned,—a Notary Publ c n and for as A State, personally appeared Tom W. Thomacn xxxxr.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and Nora arc J. Ser t03Lk`xxxxxxxxsxxxxxxxx personally known Yo me (Bt xtmxmm xmxthax xafx xeplWsmtlep to be the persona who executed the within instrument as chairman and Secretary, an behalf of the 92nd Agricultural District, and eaknowledged to as that the ]end Agricultural -District executed the within instrument pursuant to its by-laws or a resolution of its Board of Directors. NITNB89 my hand and official seal. �7 NeGry 1 C OFFICIAL SEAL (seal) LOUISF W JONN!AN nmxw Dean mrc ruan Men cane , ai wxs ann�xm::.:r.I DOCUMENT TRANSFER FORM To: From: Date: Lb�rA MESA 5h9iTiAW,/ DIET LYUu EWOTT Project Title: CD�TA M E 5 A MEWED T2An1a �EY� ITEMIZED LIST OF DATA: Please fill in the information for each document you are sending. Document Type No. Item Date Description Sheets bo►11) CD7Y 2 -CDUTI-ACT * G-12 12IP-T O F I - MkviEW IZELIEF -QFEEa+ 10 eAP 21"YCP t LOYa R ME5A REMARKS: Received By: '1 �•t7 7 Date: 114', (PnA i (Sig G M ht? (Agency) a DOCUMENT TRANSFER FORM To: From: Date: CD9rA ME5A 511&00 DisT. LYdki ELLibrr II- 2Ail Project Title: MO DTR QEWEI? TP_AI 5FC'K_ ITEMIZED LIST OF DATA: Please fill in the information/preach document you are sending. Document Type No. Item Date Description Sheets MILAL t4e5'5 & 0-OUTPACT f G- F 6KAFIGE CdWMT`/ &UO CoP1Ea Lo 11110EeounL05 5AnLiTAt°%/ '2�.xEVJW _ Own !ON I FALe-viEW -nzui,1K_(5,6 P21uQETOU Ap REMARKS: Received By: Date: ilUll (Print /r (Si �Myb (Agency) a a DOCUMENT TRANSFER FORM To: From: Date: Co5TA MESA 2Rt11TA21 DIET. L/uAI ELLIOTT 2011 Project Title: Co aTA MEtA 5EWEP� 7-IZ— At? FE9 ITEMIZED LIST OF DATA: Please fill in the information for each document you are sending. Document Type No. Item Date Description Sheets G I5 LE� I u rO2CFOTo 2 �rtr� AbOm 5. P. #&-62594 d nn j[ t47 18" VCP t5,L`f -TPAtyaFce- REMARKS: Received By: �• ' + h Date: (Print) n�IJq�„ ,tl (Sign)�-[) � bow (Agency) a DOCUMENT TRANSFER FORM To: From: Date: ifD5TA ME5A 314A11TIlkIl Ui LYLILI EWOT-[- N- - toll Project Title: CDSTA 1✓IEWA 25EWETZ T1ZAIJnFE7e_ ITEMIZED LIST OF DATA: Please fill in the information/preach document you are sending. Document Type No. Item Date Description Sheets GbuTRRC"r # II BAKELLe FAI2J1E1A/ 14PVF- BEEa -TkAAISFEP-EED TO CO�TA MEGA ZAKILTAP-q DII&T210.T 80D3 REMARKS: Received By: 'eve, Date: 1141t (Print) (Sign) (Agency) a p p C� DOCUMENT TRANSFER FORM To: From: Date: Costa Mesa Sanitary District C. Stanford, Financial 6/6/11 Management, OCSD Project Title: 32n°Agricultural District Sewer(located within OC Fairgrounds-818/90 via OCSD Resolution No. 90-114-6) ITEMIZED LIST OF DATA: Please rill in the information for each document you are sending. Document Type No. Item Date Description Sheets Property Disposal 7 6/6/11 OCSD Property Disposal Request Form with description of Request Form sewer for transfer and attached agreement/resolution. REMARKS: Received By: Date: ^�(Print) n ITYI n al [ .rQ (Sign) 0 C-�ST-�) (Agency) Orange County Sanitation District Property Disposal Request Form ,, (Print on "Green" paper) To: Warehouse NOTE: SCROLL DOWN FOR 2 PAGE DOCUMENT, PRINT AS 2-SIDED DOC. NUMBER / DIV. 230 Please check all that apply: VALUE t The following Item(s)are no longer necessary to support Division functions and request for authorization to dispose Is hereby made. -- ❑ The following support item(s)are warehouse stock and need to be obsoleted. ❑ The following items)are reported stolen and the police report claim number Is: Item Approx. (For Div. 230 Use) No. City Tag No. Description Age Condition Recommended Disposal Method A=* 3,9 lq r ra Tr -Fo 2�3$ l5'F7icr 6ewrff— CO f0. R Rn, �15�Y LF B/e/Go VLA ec5n Re5o/%ofTon rr Crt(�+-c raA "Dr6f-riG1` :5euler LoCa-fr_d wE,�-A jh ©•C• Fair rounds. 1. Art r7 Crab fen F55 2. Nrcr_ Arhonk4 l rccf�r F6 D . Requester(Print Name) DEPT. v. gr.(Print Name) a,Lt -M C T-' A119SII1 44 3{a Signature Date ((��t/n/�T Signature Date rw er\�+k Purch.Mgr.(Pont Name) (Print Name)P e o nt (,f 611l Signature Date SI lure Data 5. 5. Recelved Warehouse(Print Name) Date Removed from Fixed Asset System Signature Date p oo A dt 5 x Page 1 Revlsed: 5n500e51 Request for Property Disposal Instructions NOTE: This is a 2-page document, which should be printed as 2-sided Please review these instructions before completing the Request for Property Disposal form. The Request for Property Disposal is available by clicking the 'Request for Property Disposal'tab below, or the link at the bottom of the page. These instructions will be printed on the back of the green Request for Property Disposal form when submitting property for disposal. Department/Division • Requestor responsible for completely filling in all property disposal information required on the form and following the signature sequence as follows: 1. Print name, enter Dept, number, signs and forwards to Division Manager 2. Division Manager prints name, signs and forwards to Contracts/Purchasing Manager Contracts/ Purchasina Manager • Stamp Document number in appropriate box • 3. Print name, sign and date • •Check value box if surplus has an expected value of$500 or more and/or has a property control tag. • If value box is checked,forward to accounting • If value box remains unchecked,forward back to requestor Accounting • • If value box is checked, make copy of form for tracking • 4. Property Accountant prints name, signs and dates • Forwards back to requestor Requestor • Deliver all surplus along with a completely signed off Property Disposal Form to the Warehouse at your speck plant Warehouse • 5. Print name, sign and date • Make 3 copies of Disposal Form, file original, give one copy to Requestor(his or her receipt), give one copy to Warehouse Supervisor and attach one copy with surplus • Warehouse Supervisor work with Contracts/Purchasing Manager in determining best method of disposal Request for Property Disposal Page 2 xasnnM COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 19 2; 39 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON JULY 119 1990 \� piTA77O& ,`4�`w,e lmn q°OOIsr'9 U S T N N ORgNGE C V ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11. 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on July 11, 1990, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: �✓ ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: x James A. Rohner, Chairman _Orma Crank x Charles E. Puckett, Chai man pro tan Richard B. Edgar x Dan Griset —Dan Young z Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 2: x Iry Pickler, Chairman _Fred Hunter x James Neal, Chai man pro tom —HenryGeorge Scott x Roland E. Bigonger W. Wedaa A.B. -Suck- Catlin x Chris Marty x Dan Griset _Dan Young x William D. Mahoney Beth Graham Robert H. Main x Norman Culver x Carrey Nelson _Wayne Wedin x Arthur G. Newton _Norman Z. Eckenrode x Wayne Silzel _Harald Saldarini a Don E. Smith Fred Barrera x Roger Stanton _Dan R. Rath DISTRICT NO. 3: x Richard Polls, Chairman _Eva G. Miner x J.R. -Bob- Siefen. Chairman pro tan _Dewey Wiles x Edward L. Allen David J. Shawver x Margaret M. Arnold _Cecilia L. Age x Wes Bannister Peter Green A.B. 'Buck" Catlin x Chris Narby z Norman Culver _Robert H. Main x Beth Graham William D. Mahoney z Don R. Griffin —_Donna L. Chessen z Dan Griset Dan Young x James Neal George Scott �J x Carrey Nelson _Wayne Wedin x Iry Pickler _Fred Hunter —7--Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth x Charles Sylvia _Robert Wahlstrom a Edna Wilson Frank Laszlo DISTRICT NO. 5: x Evelyn Hart, Chairman Ruthelyn Plummer z Phil Sansone, Chai man pro tem John C. Cox, Jr. x Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 6: x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman _Evelyn Hart x James Wahner, Chairman pro tem James M. Ferryman x Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 7: a Don E. Smith, Chairman _Fred Barrera x Richard Edgar, Chai man pro ter _Charles E. Puckett x John C. Cox, Jr. _Ruthelyn Plummer x Dan Griset Dan Young x Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton x Sally Anne Sheridan Larry Agran x James Rohner =Harry Green DISTRICT NO. 11: Grace Winchell, Chairmr.T x Peter Green x Tom Mays, Chairman pro tem Jim Silva x Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 13: x Henry W. Wedaa, Chairman Roland E. Bigonger _Wayne Wedin, Chairman pro tem x Carrey Nelson x Iry Pickler —Fred Hunter x Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton a Don E. Smith Fred Barrera DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chairman _Darryl Miller —7-Sally Anne Sheridan, Chairman pro tem Larry Agran z Leslie A. Pontious —Richard B. Edgar z Dan R. Roth =Roger Stanton a Don E. Smith Fred Barrera -2- 07/11/90 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita J. Brown, Board Secretary, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Corinne Clawson, Ed Hodges, Penny Kyle, John Linder, Charles Nichols, Bob Ooten, Rich von Langan, Mark Esquer OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel , Walt Howard, Bill Knopf, Phil Stone DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file minute excer t from the City of Stanton re Boar That the minute excerpt from the City appointments of Stanton re election of mayor and appointment of alternate Director and seating a new member of the Board, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows: (*Mayor) District Active Director Alternate Director 3 Edward L. Allen* David J. Shawver ALL DISTRICTS Vice Joint Chairman Mahoney reported Report of the vice Joint hdirman that Joint Chairman Catlin is still recouperating from a recent accident and is doing well. The prognosis is for a full recovery. Mr. Mahoney also conveyed Mr. Catlin's appreciation for all the expressions of concern and get well wishes from Directors, friends, associates and others. In the absence of Joint Chairman Catlin, Vice Joint Chairman Mahoney reported that after polling the Executive Committee members, it was determined that they would not have a quorum for the special Executive Committee meeting scheduled for July 12th to consider an appeal by Universal Circuits concerning staff denial of a permit for their new facility on South Yale Street in Santa Ana. Therefore, it was decided to cancel the meeting. The Vice Joint Chairman suggested several possible dates for rescheduling the hearing, and the Directors selected August 1st at 5:30 p.m. Vice Chairman Mahoney then reported that the Fiscal Policy Committee was scheduled to meet on Wednesday, July 18th, at 5:30 p.m. He advised that he would be unable to attend, but he had asked Director Wahner to chair the meeting in his absence. He also called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, July 25th, at 5:30 p.m. , and invited Directors Sally Anne Sheridan and Bob Siefen to attend and participate in the discussions. The Vice Joint Chairman then advised that the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee was scheduled to meet on Thursday, July 26th, at 5:30 p.m. Mr. Mahoney added that the Building Committee was scheduled to meet on Tuesday, July 31st, at 5:30 p.m. -3- 07/11/90 ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager commented on the Report of the General Manager Districts' updated general information brochure which had been mailed to all Directors. He noted that additional copies were available by contacting the Districts' Public Information Officer. ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel reported on the Report of the General Counsel status of litigation filed by Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. and Universal Circuits, Inc. concerning industrial waste discharge permits. ALL DISTRICTS This being the annual meeting fixed by Annual Election of Joint ha rman the Boards of Directors for the election of the Chairman of the Joint ` Administrative Organization, the Secretary stated that A. B. "Buck" Catlin had been nominated at the regular meeting of the Joint Boards on June 13, 1990, to accordance with established procedures. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director A. B. "Buck" Catlin as Joint Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. ALL DISTRICTS This being the annual meeting fixed by Annual Election of Vice Joint the Boards of Directors for the Chairman election of the Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization, nominations were then called for the post of Vice Joint Chairman, whereupon William D. Mahoney was nominated. There being no other nominations, the vote was then polled, and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director William D. Mahoney as Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. Vice Joint Chairman Mahoney then thanked the Directors for electing him to the post. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 13, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 13, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or Approval of minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 13, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or _Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 13, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. `� -4 07/11/90 DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 13, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 13, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 13, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 13, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 13, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. �...� 6/06/90 6/20/90 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 918,175.98 $ 673,452.21 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 7,532,152.00 331 ,418.17 Joint Working Capital Fund - 116,375.26 184,104.17 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 13,256.68 9,006.36 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 30.48 64.19 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 217,916.85 23,653.45 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 144,569.06 35,416.21 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 198,604.12 32,708.28 DISTRICT NO. 6 - -0- 189.25 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 554,704.14 14,734.28 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 303.55 6,462.56 DISTRICT NO. 13 - -0- -0- DISTRICT NO. 14 - 1,095,834.75 2,469.75 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 14,392.53 1,010.52 ' DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 1,977.49 -0- DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 3,009.68 769.40 10,811,302.57 19315,458.80 -5- 07/11/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing and directing execu ion and filing of documents necessary That the following resolutions for Federal and State rants for authorizing and directing execution e 1 90-91 Joint Works Improve- and filing of documents necessary for ments and Additions Federal and State Clean Water Grants and Loans under 33 U.S.C., 1251 at seq.; Chapters 12.5, 13, 14 and 15; and Division 7 of the California Water Code, and providing certain assurances in connection with the 1990-91 Joint Works Improvements and Additions, be, and are hereby, adopted by the respective Boards of Directors: District No. Resolution No. 1 90-66-1 2 90-67-2 3 90-68-3 5 90-69-5 6 90-70-6 7 90-71-7 it 90-72-11 13 90-73-13 14 90-74-14 Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 6 to the plans Job No. J-15A and specifications for Prepurchase and Installation of Variable Frequency Drive Systems and Pumps for Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15A, authorizing a deduction of $72,000.00 from the contract with General Electric Company for the difference between design and actual efficiency ratings for the equipment, as provided in the contract specifications, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: A r0vin an e r er No. to the Tans an s ecifications re That Change Order No. 30 to the Job Nos. P1-20 and PI- 1 plans and specifications for Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20, and Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts; and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31, authorizing a net deduction of $35,426.58 from the contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. for 15 items of additional or deleted work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Jo Nos. P1- 0 and P - i as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-75, accepting Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20, and Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleancuts; and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout �..� Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -6- 07/11/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: App rov ng Change order No. 3 o the That Change Order No. 3 to the plans Tans and s ecifications re and specifications for Primary Job No. PI- Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33, authorizing an addition of $21,667.00 to the contract �,✓ with Gust K. Newberg Construction Co. for two items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Chan a rder No. 1 to he loos and s eci ca ions re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans Job No. 1-34-1 and specifications for Gas Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-1, authorizing an addition of $52,748.00 to the contract with Ziebarth 8 Alper for four items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: rov n Chan le Order o. 3 to the plans and spec fications re That Change Order No. 3 to the plans Job No. P1-34-2 and specifications for Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-2, authorizing an addition of $32,443.52 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. for eight items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin Chan a rder No. 9 to the tans and s eci icattons re That Change Order No. 9 to the plans Job No. PZ- 7 and specifications for Miscellaneous Modifications and Improvements to Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-37, authorizing an addition of $115,453.00 to the contract with Ziebarth 8 Alper for seven items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratifying action of staff in issuin a urchase order to Dorado That the Boards of Directors hereby En er rises Inc. re emergencyratify the action of staff in modifications to the C1tY of issuing a purchase order to Dorado Fountain valley water lines Enterprises, Inc. in a total amount not to exceed $39,500.00 for emergency modifications to the City of Fountain Valley water lines serving the Administration Building, Laboratory and Maintenance/Warehouse complex at Plant No. 1 required by the City and State Health Department. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: endin Boards action re issuance of purchase order to F. E. Carleton That the Boards' action of May 9, ' for professional consulting services 1990, be, and is hereby, amended, re obtaining SCAQMD permits and authorizing staff to issue a other RAQM15 issues purchase order to F. E. Carleton in an amount not to exceed $50,000.00 for professional consulting services, on an as-needed basis, for a two-year period beginning May 10, 1990, to assist the Districts in obtaining permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) for current and future projects at both treatment plants, and for assistance relative to other SCAQMD issues, correcting the hourly rate for said services from $95.00 to $115.00. -7- 07/11/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amending Boards' action re participation in the Pooled That the Boards' action of Emissions Estimation Plan PEEP December 13, 1989, be, and is With other POTWS in California to hereby, amended, relative to conduct testing re compliance with participation in the Pooled the California Air Toxics "Hot Emissions Estimation Plan (PEEP) S ots" Inventor and Assessment Act with other POTWs in California to of 1987 AB 2588 conduct necessary testing at a considerable savings re compliance with the California Air Toxics Not Spots" Inventory and Assessment Act of 1987 (AB2588) , increasing the authorized amount for the Districts' participation from an amount not to exceed $500,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $750,000.00 for additional Districts' site-specific sampling and analysis required to comply with said Act. ALL DISTRICTS Several Directors questioned or Authorizing staff to issue a commented on the annual fees purchase order to South Coast Air required to be paid to the South Quality Management District for Coast Air Quality Management payment of various fees required District (SCAQMD). Some expressed for fiscal year 1990-91 their opinion that in light of the recent SCAQMD Clean Air award received by the Districts, they felt that the various annual SCAQMD fees should be reduced in the upcoming fiscal year, and several Directors spoke in opposition to the payment of these fees. It was requested that staff submit a breakdown of all fees paid to SCAQMD during the 1990-91 fiscal year and report to the Board next year when this item is up for reauthorization. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried by voice vote: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to South Coast Air Quality Management District in an amount not to exceed $300,000.00 for payment of various fees required by SCAQMD regulations, payable during fiscal year 1990-91, estimated as follows: Type of Fee Amount Annual Emissions $94,000 Annual Operating Permit 45,000 Permit Evaluation 28,000 Hot Spots, Toxics and Precursors 18,000 Source Test Analysis 60,000 Miscellaneous Fees 55,000 TOTAL $300,000 Directors Richard Polis and Don Roth requested that their votes in apposition to the motion be recorded. -8- 07/11/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file 5ummOn5 and Complaint to Enforce Stop Notice on That the Summons and Complaint to Payment Bond; for Breach of Written Enforce Stop Notice; on Payment Contract; Common Counts and on Bond; for Breach of Written Contractors License Bond, Acme Contract; Common Counts and on Rents, Inc. vs. Tierra Industrial Contractors License Bond, Acme Builders, Inc. , et al . , Orange Rents, Inc. vs. Tierra Industrial County Municipal Court-West Builders, Inc. , et al . , Orange Judicial District Case No. 162859, County Municipal Court-West Judicial re Job No. J-20 District Case No. 162859, relative to a previous Stop Notice filed in connection with Warehouse and Maintenance Building and Oil Storage and Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file burrinons and Complaint to Enforce Stop Notice That the Summons and Complaint to and Complaint on Paymen Bond, Enforce Stop Notice and Complaint on Carpenters Southern Ualitornia Payment Bond, Carpenters Southern Administrative Corporation vs. California Administrative Orange County Sanitation Districts, Corporation vs. Orange County et al . , Orange County Municipal Sanitation Districts, et al . , Orange Court-West Judicial District Case County Municipal Court-West Judicial No. 163462, re Job No. J-20 District Case No. 163462, relative to a previous Stop Notice filed in connection with Warehouse and Maintenance Building and Oil Storage and Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20, be, and is hereby, received and �✓ ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written report of the Conservation, That the written report of the Reclamation and Reuse Committee Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee's meeting on June 28, 1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Amendment No. 3 to Agreement for Removal , Processing That Amendment No. 3 to Agreement and Disposal of Sewage Solids with for Removal , Processing and Disposal Recyc, Inc. of Sewage Solids with Recyc, Inc. , providing for an extension of the ' term of said agreement to February 11, 1991, with no change in the current agreement provisions and cost ($380.00 per truck load) , and providing for - annual extension of said agreement by the General Manager upon mutual agreement, in form approved by the General Counsel , be, and is hereby, approved. 9- 07/11/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Agreement with L. Curti Truck and Equipment for removal , That the Agreement with L. Curti processing and disposal of Truck and Equipment for removal , Districts' solids residuals - processing and disposal of V.! Districts' solids residuals, for a period expiring April 12, 1991, at a cost of $380.00 per truck load from Plant No. 1 and $420.00 per truck load from Plant No. 2, and providing for annual extension of said agreement by the General Manager upon mutual agreement, in form approved by the General Counsel , be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written _ report of the Executive omnt ttee That the written report of the Executive Committee meeting held on June 27, 1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Establishing District procedures for settlement of Workers' That the Boards of Directors hereby Compensation claims made against adopt Resolution No. 90-89, the Districts establishing District procedures for settlement of Workers' Compensation claims made against the Districts. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratifying action of Fiscal Policy Committee in placing statutory That the action of the Fiscal Policy Excess Workers' Compensation Committee in placing statutory insurance coverage effective Excess Workers' Compensation July 1, 1990 insurance coverage, with $250,000 self-insured retention, effective July 1, 1990, for an annual premium not to exceed $36,257.00, be, and 1s hereby, ratified. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving policy re furnishing vehicles for management personnel That the Boards of Directors hereby and repealing Resolution No. 73-15 adopt Resolution No. 90-84, approving policy re furnishing vehicles for management personnel and repealing Resolution No. 73-15 and all other previous resolutions pertaining thereto. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 1990-91 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1990-91 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 13,742,000 Capital Facilities Fund 17,261,000 Construction Fund - 1986 4,034,000 Construction Fund - 1990 25,313,000 TOTAL $ 60,350,000 -10- 07/11/90 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 1 - 1 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1990-91 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 35,161,000 Capital Facilities Fund 64,996,000 Construction Fund - 1986 11,949,000 Construction Fund - 1990 76,002,000 TOTAL $188,108,000 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and unanimously PA rov n 1 - 1 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: uNoat That the District's 1990-91 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 42,645,000 Capital Facilities Fund 69,836,000 Construction Fund - 1986 13,496,000 Construction Fund - 1990 81,883,000 Bond 8 Interest Fund - 1951 269,000 TOTAL $208,129.000 DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and unanimously �+�✓ App roving 1 - f scal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1990-91 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 9,673,000 Capital Facilities Fund 9,452,000 Construction Fund - 1990 20,850,000 Bond 8 Interest Fund - 1951 33,000 TOTAL $ 40,008,000 DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving - 1 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1990-91 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 7,768,000 Capital Facilities Fund 10,260,000 Construction Fund - 1990 15,500,000 TOTAL $ 33,528,000 -11- 07/11/90 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 199 - 1 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1990-91 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 13,218,000 Capital Facilities Fund 28.253,000 Construction Fund - 1990 25,603,000 Bond 8 Interest Fund - 1962 296,000 _ TOTAL $ 67,370,000 DISTRICT it Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 1990-91 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1990-91 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 11,175,000 Capital Facilities Fund 13,709,000 Construction Fund - 1990 26,120,000 Bond 8 Interest Fund - 1958 37,000 TOTAL $ 51,041,000 DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 1990-91 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1990-91 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 9179000 Capital Facilities Fund 12,414,000 TOTAL $ 13,331,000 DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 1990-91 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1990-91 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 1,2339000 Capital Facilities Fund 13,483,000 TOTAL $ 14,716,000 -12- 07/11/90 DISTRICTS 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Estab ish n e annual ann a ro riot ons lima for f sca That the following resolutions year 15 90-91 establishing the annual Gann appropriations limit for fiscal year 1 / 1990-91 for each District in accordance with the provisions of Division 9 of Vs� Title 1 of the California Government Code, be, and are hereby, adopted by the respective Boards of Directors: DISTRICT RESO. NO. LIMITATION 1 90-76-1 $ 2,273,000 2 90-77-2 8,539,000 3 90-78-3 11,384,000 5 90-79-5 2,174,000 6 90-80-6 1,362,000 7 90-81-7 3,317,000 11 90-82-11 2,339,000 13 --- Not Applicable 14 --- Not Applicable Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 8 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing each District to reimburse its capital tuna reserves That the following resolutions from the roceeds of approved authorizing each District to reimburse indebtedness Issues its capital fund reserves from the proceeds of approved indebtedness - issues, for the expenditure of funds for the design and construction of any capital facilities projects identified in the 1989 Master Plan of �.✓ Facilities, be, and are hereby, adopted by the respective Boards of Directors: District No. Resolution No. 1 90-90-1 2 90-91-2 3 90-92-3 5 90-93-5 6 90-94-6 7 90-95-7 11 90-96-11 Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:55 p.m. , July 11, 1990. -13- 07/11/90 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving han a Order No. 2 to the lans and s eci ications for That Change Order No. 2 to the plans ac on r o. 2-rill- and specifications for North Branch baud of the Rolling Hills Drive Relief Subtrunk Sewer (and City of Brea sewer), Contract No. 2-11-3, authorizing an addition of $87,590.00 to the contract with Colich 8 Sons (JV) for six items of additional work and granting a time extension of 145 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. to t e tans and specifications for That Change Order No. 3 to the plans antract No. -11-3 and specifications for North Branch of the Rolling Hills Drive Relief Subtrunk Sewer (and City of Brea sewer) , Contract No. 2-11-3, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a net deduction of $4,442.00, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Contract No. 2-11-3 as complete That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 90-83-2, accepting North Branch of the Rolling Hills Drive Relief Subtrunk Sewer (and City of Brea sewer), Contract No. 2-11-3, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment _ That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:55 p.m. , July 11, 1990. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:55 p.m., July 11, 1990. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file summons and Complaint for Personal Injury, That the Summons and Complaint for John L. Smith vs. City of Personal Injury, John L. Smith Huntington Beach, et al ., Orange vs. City of Huntington Beach, et ounty Superior Court Case al . , Orange County Superior Court No. 571306 Case No. 571306, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:55 p.m. , July 11, 1990. �J -14- 07/11/90 DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: A - ournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:55 p.m., July 11, 1990. DISTRICT 5 Actions re Chan a Order No. 1 o Contract No. - 4- Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering reported that in January 1990 the Board awarded Contract No. 5-34-2, Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, to Kenko, Inc. in the amount of $1,959,690.00 for approximately 6,500 feet of 36-inch diameter gravity sewer pipe along three separate deteriorated sections of the Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer (originally installed in 1936) in Bayside Drive from Pacific Coast Highway to Marguerite. Mr. Dawes advised that Change Order No. 1 adds $495,775.00 to the contract and explained that $106,320.00 is for work previously deleted from Contract No. 5-34-1 and added to Contract No. 5-34-2; $282,355.00 is for work to be reimbursed by Mobil Oil Co.; and $107,100.00 is for relocating City of Newport Beach water lines. He further reported that Item No. 1 of the change order included work that was originally part of Contract No. 5-34-1 which was to be constructed in conjunction with the City of Newport Beach project for improvement of Pacific Coast Highway, and it was bid as part of the City' s project. However, only a small portion was completed under the City contract. The major portion was deleted when the City discovered subsurface gasoline contamination. Mobil Oil Co. , the operators of a service station on the southeast corner of Bayside Drive and PCH, met with staff regarding the subsurface contamination. Staff and Mobil Oil developed a plan whereby the District would tunnel under the Intersection to avoid disruption to traffic and complete the Contract 5-34-1 work deleted by the City, and Mobil would reimburse the District for all cost increases above the original bid for the sewer work before the gasoline contamination was discovered. Staff pointed out that the costs were not final yet. Remaining costs are estimated at $25,000.00 for added traffic control and slurry work. Mr. Dawes reiterated that District 5 would not incur any additional costs over and above the $106,320.00 deleted from Contract No. 5-34-1 and the bid prices for Contract No. 5-34-2. Any such costs will be reimbursed by Mobil . He further reviewed Item No. 2 included in Change Order No. 1 relative to relocation of two City of Newport Beach water lines found in the intersection of Jamboree Boulevard and Bayside Drive. The City was ' unaware of the water lines at the time the contract was approved. Because the work was extensive and specialized, staff and project - designers prepared plans and specifications for the relocation, secured approval from City staff, and awarded the work to the low bid subcontractor after receiving bids. It was noted that these additional casts will be paid for by District No. 5. There may be additional costs incurred before the work is completed which would be submitted as ` J a separate change order for the Board's consideration at a later date. �a✓ -15- 07/11/90 A rovin Chan a Order No. 1 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: fans an s eci cations for contract NO. b-J4-4 That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Improvements to `f Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 2, Contract No. 5-34-2, authorizing an addition of $495,775.00 to the contract with Kenko, Inc., dba McGrand & Associates, for two items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 5 Actions re subordination o District's easement rights to County of urange re DontraCt No. Verbal report of General Counsel The District's General Counsel reported that the County of Orange had requested that the Disrict approve an agreement subordinating their interest in an easement granted by The Irvine company to District 5 in connection with construction of the downcoast sewer (Contract No. 5-35). He explained that several months ago, the Laguna Beach Water District abandoned an existing line in Pacific Coast Highway and quitclaimed their Interest back to The Irvine Company. The District can use the existing trench for a portion of the proposed downcoast sewer. Accordingly, The Irvine Company granted the District an easement over this trench plus an additional 14 feet. However, the County of Orange had placed a condition upon the approval of The Irvine Company's Tract Map No. 14131 relative to the Pelican Hills development which stipulated that The Irvine Company could not give easements to anyone. This condition applied to the easement previously given to District No. 5 re Contract No. 5-35. Mr. Woodruff indicated that it is `..,� standard practice for the Districts to take a subordinate position for street purposes, and this agreement would not impair the District's position. He added that since this easement is in Pacific Coast Highway rather than a County street, District 5 would subordinate to the County and they, in turn, will subordinate to CALTRANS. Receive and file General Counsel 's Moved, seconded and duly carried: Memorandum re su ord na on a ree- men with ounty of range That the General Counsel 's Memorandum dated June 26, 1990 re subordination agreement with the County of Orange in connection with District's easement rights relative to South Coast Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-35, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Approving agreement with County of Moved, seconded and duly carried: Orange for subordination of District's easement rights That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 90-85-5, approving an agreement with the County of Orange for subordination of District's easement rights in connection with construction of the South Coast Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-35. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8.07 p.m. , July 11, 1990. -16- 07/11/90 DISTRICTS 6 7 8 14 c ons re Final Sup plament No. 1 to EIR for Proposed Formation of District No. 14 and Reorganization of Districts 7 and ii relative to Chan es re on rac NOS. 14-1-1A 1MP% an 14-1- Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering reported that Supplement No. 1 addresses changes in the alignment of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Contract Nos. 14-1-1A and 14-1-1B, and the Baker Force Mains, Contract No. 14-1-2; increases in pipe sizes from 78-inch to 90-inch and from 72-inch to 81-inch pipe to be consistent with new sewer design criteria included in the adopted 1989 Master Plan; and acquisition of the easements required for construction of said conveyance facilities. These projects begin at the Main Street Pump Station, located in the John Wayne Airport "clear zone" just north of Main Street. The Main Street Pump Station, and this project, will convey flow from the cities Of Tustin and Irvine to the Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant. Between the pump station and Baker Street at Bristol Street, two 42-inch force mains (pressure lines) will be constructed under Contract No. 14-1-2, expected to start construction in a few months. An easement has been obtained from the County of Orange for the portion of the sewer to be constructed in the airport's Main Street parking lot. Between Bristol Street and Fairview Road, construction of an 81-inch gravity sewer is nearly complete under Contract No. 14-1-1B. This project includes the rebuilding of Baker Street for the City of Costa Mesa, under a cooperative reimbursement agreement. Because there were no problems with alignment on this phase and no easements were required, the project was approved by the Directors for construction. The final leg, Contract No. 14-1-1A, a 90-inch gravity sewer, extends from Fairview Road westerly in Baker to Deodor Avenue (one block west of Harbor) , where it turns north to Gisler Avenue. The first of three easements, within a private parking lot, is required in this Deodor Avenue leg. The parking lot serves a commercial building. The occupant of this property is opposed to construction within the parking lot, and has engaged an attorney to represent him. The attorney presented comments (after the close of the public comment period) which are addressed in the Final EIR document. The response gives reasons for the alignment choice, namely this alignment minimizes traffic and homeowner disruption. The project then proceeds westerly in Gisler Avenue to the Santa Ana River. Between the Greenville-Banning Channel (located on the east side of the Santa Ana River) and westerly side of the Costa Mesa bluff, the project is designed within the northerly boundary of the Mesa Verde Country Club golf course, requiring a second private easement. This golf course alignment out of the street right-of-way is necessary because the street is lower than the profile of the sewer conduit. The Mesa Verde Country Club has also engaged an attorney to present their -17- 07/11/90 opposition to construction on their golf course. The comments (received after the close of the comment period) were responded to in the Final EIR. This alignment will certainly impact the golf course, but minimizes disruption over other possible alignments, or the raising of Gisler Avenue's elevation. As stated in the Final EIR, lass of trees and shrubs will be mitigated by either replanting existing specimens or buying new specimens. After siphoning under the Greenville-Banning Channel , the alignment proceeds north in private right-of-way to the point where it enters the Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant. Acquisition of a third easement from Southern California Edison is required in the narrow area between the Santa Ana River and the Greenville-Banning Channel. Mr. Dawes advised that the Final Supplement No. 1 addresses all of the comments received on the Draft Supplement, including the objections of the property owners relative to the proposed alignment of Contract No. 14-1-1A requiring easements. Receive and file Staff Summary Moved, seconded and duly carried: Report That the Staff Summary Report dated July 3, 1990 re Supplement No. 1 to the Environmental Impact Report for Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of District Nos. 7 and 13 re Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Contract Nos. 14-1-1A and 14-1-1B, and Baker Force Mains, Contract No. 14-1-2, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file written comments Moved, seconded and duly carried: received after the public hearing That the written comments received after the public hearing on March 14, 1990 (included in the Final Supplement No. 1) , be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive file and approve Final Moved, seconded and duly carried: upplement No. 1 to Environmental Impact Report That the Final Supplement No. 1 to Environmental Impact Report for Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of District Nos. 7 and 13 re Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Contract Nos. 14-1-1A and 14-1-1B, and Baker Force Mains, Contract No. 14-1-2, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors do hereby certify that said Final Supplement No. 1 to Environmental Impact Report has been completed in compliance with the State and Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended. Certifying Final pplement No. 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: to En vironmental Su Impact Report That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-86, certifying said Final Supplement No. 1 to Environmental Impact Report; making certain findings relating to significant environmental effects identified in the Supplement; adopting a statement of overriding considerations; and authorizing the filing of a Notice of Determination re said projects. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -18- 07/11/90 DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:12 p.m., July 11, 1990. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rov n an a rder No. 1 to the ens and s ecif cations for That Change Order No. 1 to the plans Contract No. -11-1 and specifications for Abandonment of Lane Road Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-1, and Abandonment of Castlerock and Dow Avenue Pump Stations and Modifications to MacArthur Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-3, authorizing an addition of $27,913.00 to the contract with Colich 8 Sons (JV) for two items of additional work and granting a time extension of six calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: AUTO n lans and specifications for ontract No. 7-13 That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 90-87-7, approving plans and specifications for Campus Relief Sewer, between Von Kerman Avenue and Jamboree Boulevard, Contract No. 7-13, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Agreement with County of Orange re adjustment of manhole That the Board of Directors hereby covers and clean-outs on District adopts Resolution No. 90-88-7, sewers in conjunction with County's approving Agreement with County of 19TP5 street racing program Orange, providing for the adjustment �..� of manhole covers and clean-outs an District sewers in conjunction with the County's 1989-90 street resurfacing program in unincorporated County areas within District No. 7, and providing for payment of the actual cost of the manhole adjustment plus 10% for inspection and administrative costs for approximately 302 manholes, at a per-manhole unit cost not to exceed $220.00 nor be less than $155 per manhole; and for clean-outs, at a per-clean-out unit cost not to exceed $176.00 nor be less than $125.00 per clean-out; and authorizing payment of required deposit of $66,968.00 for said work. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:12 p.m., July 11, 1990. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:12 p.m. , July 11, 1990. Secretary, of he Boards o rectors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 -19- FU( 9199 - JT DIST WORXING CAPITAL ` PROCESSING DATE 5/30/90 PAGE I REPORT NUMBER AP43 mIll amgar nAex Gr rnnx♦] CLAIMS 1410 1111,190 POSTING DATE 06/06/90 - • An ANT N., vrunnp Amn .1 nre rp.PiTkil 107234 A.M. BEST COMPANY S90.31 PUBLICATION • n w�CESPI aoanRa a aeVlry 107236 ADAMSON UNIFORM B EDUIF. S1.04B.69 LAB SUPPLIES I..... A6,.McO CONETRUCTORS9 INC: 6076.)21.85 MNSTRUM16H PI-34-2 LOp.]f �K7 ° 101P39 AL PHAOAE "IT.63 SPECIALTY CASES 107240 AMERICAN AIR FILTER. INC. f1.333.14 HECMANICAL PARTS 107242 ROBCO INC4 B/OR AMERICAN SEALS $5.640,62 CASKETS/FITTINGS - 107243 AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY 91#594.28 FILM Dy244 ANIrirY . War a rAelO ika n:p4 mR1 xRu0NE aveTRw vl., M. 107245 ANTHONY•S MICH. B MACHINE. INC $1.533.31 PUMP PARTS ' 107246 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $7.760.81 NOTICES 6 ADS yv'41 APPLF ARE S1.H P�>1 TPRRne1RY AReV1rP¢ . 107248 ARATER SERVICES. INC. $446:26 GRIM MB ^ 107249 ARENS INDUSTRIES INC. $182 83 INSTRUMENT PARTS 12225 rueNTrn: ReRma ^ 107251 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $61,493.44 GRIT REMOVAL M.0.7-13-88 ^ 107252 BRY SAFETY B SUPPLY $1.646.88 SAFETY SUPPLIES Sfn ^ 107254 PYY. BARBTi AND ASSOC. S5.562.58 CDNSTR iom 08RViCE3 P1-34-2.P2-J7 ^ 107255 BARtER SCIENTIFIC PAQDUS7S S1.TB8461 LAB BUPPLI¢0' . CRAwirA1 PARTR 147257 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS $634.11 OFFICE SUPPLIES 107258 BON-A-RUES $185.63 TRUCK PARTS 22.1..yo oevw n 107260 BRENN R-F�EBLCP 6 ASSOC:i INC. 1170.73. INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 307261 BRI NOR 90N COA�. S1J554.690.70. CONSTRUCTION J=10-2 n 12 A4 RpnNN R eA,BNF 1 •fi]k e.an - 'A. RFRmryy 107263 BR DUN S CALOYELL CONSULTING $37.238.98 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19 107264 SIEVE RUBA LO CONSTRUCTION CO. $1.455.043.00 CONSTRUCTION 14-1-IB 2ay-9a° P IR1.Tr1TT11w 1 101266 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE $609.70 PUBLICATION '• 101267 GARY S. STREEO S246.51 PETTY MR Re1MBUB8EBNT 11 e ° 107270 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH. INC. f2$166.90 LAB CHEMICALS 107270 CAL-PAC CHEMICAL CO., INC. 5186.90 GROUP ATIS ANDcln emno Psvma ' 107972 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION, INC 1115629 TRUCK PARTS ' 107273 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE S85.00 GATE TUNER ° 1212 •QS&.26— —MECffAMLCAL slmvl.Tev__ ° 1072T5 CAPITAL WESTWARD fYY2.69 MECHANICAL PARTS ' 107276 JOHN CAROLLD ENG IHEERS $300,375.90 ENGINEERING SERVICE.: J-_5,•.4,PI-20 e..... TRwcR PARTA ' 1072TB CENTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM $154.77 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 107279 CENTURY SAFETY INS7. B SUPP. 51.067.28 SAFETY SUY,LIES A FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5130/91 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER 4P43 NIY-4ANISA.Sl.ON-0.1SIR1C13-0L_ORANGE-COUNT CLAIMS PAID 06/06/90 POSTING DATE 06/06/90 ' ARBANT -0- Wr¢nn, •NOUNS ' 167280 CHEMICAL ABSTRACTS SERVICE 1110.0E SUBSCRIPTION 32" .. *.STRUNG:' PARL ' 107289 GALE -CHRISTIAN STRUC. ENSR. $3,348.50 DRAFTING SERVICES J-7-4 ' 107283 CHROME CEANMSNAFT4 INC. 91,280.00 NECHABICAL PARTS 7979" r1 ARN rnumlil T..TY 16,,42 00 ENCINERRINGS...1C13.-1�20 107285 COAST INSURANCE AGENCY $327,150.00 PROPERTY INSURANCE M.0.5-9-90 107286 COLICH AND SONS $240,792.30 CONSTRUCTION 2-11-3 DIPMEum 107288 COMPNSERVE _ Al2.60 COMPUTER SERVICES 107289 CONARO•S PHOTOGRAPHY. $212.50 PHOTOGRAPHY - p .uEe r,-- 133.34 n. ¢Tovuav ' 107291 CONNELL G.M. PARTS / DIV. $63.14 TRUCK PARTS ' 107292 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. $7,943.98 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 5702.2' v'I18PBINTINF 107294 CONTROL OAiA CORP. S171.37 INSTRUMENT PART 107295 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS NEST $12#235.25 . CONSULTING SERVICES P2-42 -All,'pT..1n KNOWS. N ^ e_11-As,v_ _ho ._,.A 2 107297 R. E. COULTER CRANE RENTAL 51.063.00 CRANE RENTAL 107290 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $171.98 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES >< 107300 CMEMPRO ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 3L135.94 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 107301 DAE INSTRUMENTS 180.0¢ ELECTRIC PARTS 107303 DEZUR7X AND/OR CS CO. - $27.13 VALVE PARTS 197304 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $2.296.14 PRINTING EETDESnu.,.¢ n" 107306 DORADO ENTERPRISES# INC. 11.39349 PLANT MAINTENANCE A REPAIRS ' 107307 OUNMEL BROS, MACH MOVING . 5930.00 SPACE RENT J-19 N ' _lm" BUN - . ._ 107309 D'VALS SALES 2279.51 FITTINGS 107310 EASTMAN. INC. $1.686.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 10731, W. IT. ENTRY CORP, pESIU11lnn 1-11-1.1-17 IOT312 ECOANALYSIS} INC. A1.030.P3 OCEAN RESEARCH 107313 ENCHANTER. INC. $7,000.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.3-I4-90 _101314 TANSY. rnytTRTI.RR I.ECAL-821VIC24 - Dpman 107315 FACILITIES SUPPORT CO. S604.20 TOOLS ' 107316 JOHN S. FALKENSTEIN P.E. $3.750.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-4.J-20 Djj p FILTER _ ' 101316 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $144.00 AIR FREIGHT 107319 FINANCIAL MODELING SPECIALISTS $200.00 SOFEVARE "_Ila320 FISCHER R PORTER CO. _SI1292..U.. CBLDRIWlDN PARTS 107321 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. S194.54 LAB SUPPLIES 107322 FLAT S VERTICAL CONCRETE $133.25 CONCRETE CUTTING 22323 FLOW TEEN 1273.119 TpETpNuvvT PAyra 107324 FLUID HANDLING SYSTEMS S139.98 - POMP PARTS 107325 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $12.23 FIAT F UTAL 9199 - JT pIST WORKING CAPITAL TPL REPORT NUMBER AP43 `,( PROCESSING DATE �/31'/90 PAGE 3 4� . . '^134I06106/90 POSTING DANOC_C106/9 CLAIMS PAID 06/06/90 POSTING GATE 06106/90 ' AlR•ur u urN00n AtlOUN'.f _-O CS CH18Llnu __ ' 101326 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $6.512.92 WATER USEAGE 779 al [NSxRuIOM-SUP 107328 FRANKLIN ELECTRONIC COMPUTER $294.19 OFFICE SUPPLIES 107329 FREEWAY TRUCK PARTS $902.63 TRUCK PARTS 03 tdL.-tA •UHBER/.RARON... 107333 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS $8.232.50 FIBERGLASS FABRICATION T. 307332 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. i1.705.88 TELEPHONE SERVICES *7333 26 " ECAISZA00 '•E Tu - 107379 GIERLTCN-MI TCNELli INC. Y1b.050.9] MECHANCIAL PARTS ' t07335 GOOD-HEART VILCUN COi $Tii 7S BUILDING 3UPPLI83 03316 OON OHE CN L AB9^CI ATES- f91669 OO - Il@VRYI.VU�.'RVICBR 107337 HAM DIESEL MACHINE fSB 1.S6 TRUCK PARTS 107338 HACH COMPANY AS20.56 LAB SUPPLIES 433 H1'HBMIYAI._6N 107340 NA TCH L K RK+. INC. - $10,934.55 MECHANICAL PARTS 107341 S..A. HEAL T C0.' 6123.V62i29 CONSTRUCTION PI-35-1 336t .0,. uA u7 t107'RO NRETTNG ESSIG,, ' 107393 HILT1. INC. f92S.55 FITTINGS ' I07344 MOERBIGER C.V.S. CALIF. . INC. f173.31 COMPUTER PARTS X ' 107346 HOUSE OF BATTERIES 61.395.7) BATTERIES'PARTS . S 107397 NASA HUGHES CD:A INC. f3.97 p36 SAFETY SUPPLIER - �Un 107349 HUNTINGTON SUPPLY $90.65 UMBRAGE —1- 107350 HUNTINGTON VALLEY TOOL f297.39 TOOLS n " 107352 IMP¢RIAL Y[3T CNEMI CAL $56.723112 YBRRtC CSLORIDE k.0,1l-0B-39 E/U 107353 INDy STR SAL SYSTEMSA 1111 9683.05 ELECTRIC PARTS 1_^333• - 1Nnna rn lel ruecenrn oo nnun�t ygas_I. Carve hA 107355 INFILCO DEGREMONT, INC. 1111.53 MECHANICAL PARTS ^ 107356 INGRAM PAPER f9.280.95 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES I4R7 ......A""' •- IT A 7Nr- u Sal Ac SPT 2073SO IYTERNA71ON AL SENSOR TECH. $1,356.33 INSTRUMENT PARTS 107359 INTERNAi ION AL TIRE RECORDER $89.00 SERVICE AGREmn 3-113361 .ua.ur ntu CRyA�R�.einrnr f 1.S00.80 — "ATEL.USEAOv — 107361 JAYS CATERING 9337.60 MEETING EXPENSE ' 107362 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $145.32 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES R3363—, .inrrr nss.rr ^enn"r.¢ a211H.bR OniaSUERLIBS 117364 KALLEEN•S COMPUTER SUPPLIES $2,537.32 COMPUTER PARTS ' 107365 KAMAN BEARINGS L SUPPLY 1161,20 FITTINGS 8.1366 KAMER nnOP Atu 1630•14 TMnL3- 107367 THE KEITH COMPANIES $2.595.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-35A5-36 107.168 BERKO♦ INC. f105.399.10 CONSTRUCTION 5-3e-2 q .rare nn 7 .ur_ a.RIl.Iln •ere. n 207370 KIEWIT PACIFIC CO. $214075.60 CONSTRUCTION PI-3I 107371 KING BEARING. INC. $4.779.73 Main SUPPLIES u u � w h L FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAP176L PROCESSING DATE 5/50/90 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 6ESOU6 CLAIMS PAID 06I06/90 POSTING DATE 06/0619/90 ' ' 107464 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $1,595.50 PHYSICAL BRANS ' PRSSENTATION-AIDS - r ' 10196E SNI1N-EMERY COi - f5324Y:00 SOIL TESTING N,0.6-34-89 107467 SOFT WAREHOUSE S73331 COMPUTER PARTS '• SR SOtl. :e Q,,D IT n ' .t . /07469 SOUR TURBINES INTERNATIONAL 1499.1E GENERATOR REPAIR ' 107470 SO. COAST AIR QUALITY $9,001.00 APPLICATION PEES ' 107479 : SOUTHERN CALIF.,t61864 CO3 110845!l.79- PONIBfl 1 " 107473 SOUTHEEN COUNTIES Ot 00 373l:98- bIRBBL.PNEi. _ _ ' 107475 WESTALLOY INC. 11.625.35 WELDING SUPPLIES IDT476 STAR TOOL 6 SUPPLY CO. 11.41A.50 TOOLS • 10797E ' SUNSET FORD y l9:B8': }RULE MEN 107419 SUPER CHEW-CURE N: 11;947aAt CHEMICALS , 107481 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL. INC. $21.063.03 9NREiARB N. 107482 TCH ASSOCIATES 3392.40 LAB SUPPLIES X 10 7e e4 : `.,tE ANsERqq egNP; �.,;} .; A"so6:a b. Wout" SoPTYARE ' x 107495 TR AY EL tAAYft ,., f-' }Deviob � ia6veb 0BE9ibib 2.0 ib-li-B 107487 J.6• TUCKER 6 SON. INC. $637.l6 INSTRUMENT PARTS 107480 TWINING LABORATORIES OF 1909.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-S9 107RDSFNARINT ANAIYTICAI AZT,.,I 490 UNION SIGN C01 1E76449 NICNe. 107991 UNITED PARCEL BE V1b€„ !1l T947 PABC®.:Ski BE 107493 UPJOHN HEALTHCARE SERVICES 1136.00 CPR TRAINING 107494 INN SCIENTIFIC $4.243.75 LAB SUPPLIES TV 1533IDT496 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY Cb: 15.692082 PITTIN08 101497 VALLEY DETROIT DIESEL 112.15 PARTS 10749A ,ART AN INSTRUMENT GROUP i17, ` TRUCE bemrb dnyRrmum'_ i1. t,kV 107499 VEHICLE SPRING SERVICE $319.06 SPRING REPAIR ' 107500 VIKI NG INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY '1.7,1.B1 SAFETY '_'tFPLI68 107502 CARL WARREN 1 CO. 3896.39 - INSURANCE CLAM ADMINISTRATOR 107503 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL. 130T.50 PUBLICATION 107505 WESTERN PACIFIC EQUIPMENT CO. 1458.79 TRUCK PARTS 107506 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY 451.690.35 CAUSTIC SODA IT 8-9-99 10750E NOR [PERFECT CORP.CO, 116b.13 COMPUTER SUPMAn 117509 ICA ON CORP. $1,248.39 COPIER LEASES (_ u FUN 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL ( PROCESSING GATE di13f!/90 PACE 3 y RFPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY--SANLIAI-IDN.-UILSTA.ICLi OFI RANGE-C011NIY CLAIMS PAID 06/06/90 POSTING DATE 06/06/90 AEEAUT up EENOOP AROWNT ^ER Ce1➢EION _ ' 101326 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY fe.512.92 WATER USEACE ♦T9-01 INSTRUIOU.T-SYRELIE6 ' 107328 FRANNLIN ELECTRONIC COMPUTER $294.19 OFFICE SUPPLIES • 107329 FREEWAY TRUCK PARTS $902.63 TRUCK PARTS 16L.36 LUMBBR{NARON I.. • 107331 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS f9♦232.90 FIBERGLASS gABRICATION ' 107332 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. 91.7115.88 TELEPHONE SERVICES gMIC ° 107334 6IERLICH-NITCHELLI INC. i13♦050.93 MECHANCIAL PARTS 10733E GOOD HEART Wq CON COY - f77.75 BUILDING SUPPLIES US'A DAN 6ir, • °^CJArE° •31665-00 SIIRVLYINL-..'RYIC88 RBS LB 72 I07337 HAM DIESEL MACHINE $587.56 TRUCK PARTS 107338 HACH COMPANY S320.56 LAB SUPPLIES 4-73 &.TBRIQYAL RRPAIR 107340 MATCH L KIRK+ INC. $10.234.55 MECRANICAL PARTS 107341 S _A. MEALY CO. 9123♦462.29 CONSTRUCTION 0I-35-1 AAR Y�irYAn ui.. C$SPISJ9A ' 107343 HILTI♦ INC. $425.55 FITTINGS 107344 MOERBIGER C.V.S. CALIF. ♦ INC. S173.31 COMPUTER PARTS BIG" CA CUME TI'A' EARTH X I'MIXA3 07346 HOUSE OF 04TTER3 IS 3L1349♦77 SATT8ki23'' - S 07341 N4 NU ONES Coot INC. 13♦576.36 "' WE" SUPPLIES "alw- 07349 HUNTINGTON SUPPLY $90.65 HAUMIAGE 07350 HUNTINGTON VALLEY TOOL $247.39 TOOLS D 07359 IMPENIAL'WEST CHEMICAL 356.723.12 - FERRIC CHORTLIG N.0.11-08-89 07353 INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS. INC. S6B 3.05 9LICTRIC PARTS W .UnUkTu1A1 i ArAnrn PhA fis QI 411.5 rECHAUNIOhs 07356 INGRAM DEGREMONT. iNC. .204.95 JANITORIAL PARTS 07356 INGR4M PAPCR f4.2B9.95 JANITORIAL BUPPLI86 0707359 INTEA NATIONAL TENSOR TERN. f1.356.37 IERVICEAG PARTS 07359 IRTERNATTONAL TIME RECORIER f89.00 BBRVICB EAGIL- Bt77 07361 TRV"JAV-SF ATERING e�rsiorrr _ __S L.SOO.60 _ MEETINGSM07362 JAYS CATERING $145.32 MEETING 6KPBN58 07362 JOMNSTONE SUPPLY 8198.32 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 64 MALLS nvr r rr PlImCOMPUTER re ,537.32 COMPUTER PARTls 107365 KAHAN BEARINGS SUPPLIES f2953T.32 FITTINGS PARTS - ' 107365 KAREN RBT91NG5 L SUPPLY S161A2C FITTINGS ➢136a YsUrR i0uolWr 1618•E4 Tf1f10L9— 107367 THE KEITH COMPANIES f2.385.5P ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-3565-36 ' 107369 KENKO♦ INC. 9185♦399.10 CONSTRUCTION 5-34-2 167%62 gr... nn . rur_ srRQ.Ile WASTE OTT 107370 KIEWIT PACIFIC CO. S21.075.60 CONSTRUCTION P1•31 107371 KING REARING. INC. $4,779.73 HACHIMS SUPPLIES h FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST MORNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/30/9J PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 rNUMrr csNj.TAllON--0 LEER LC 7 S-DE-CULANSE COLIN rr CLAIMS PAID 06/06/90 POSTING DATE 06/P6/90 ;ARRANT;IARRANT NO, VrNnOR Nnliml _ nCerRtPTtnw 107372 MNOX INDUSTP14L SUPPLIES $3,054.93 TOOLS • Or ^nNSTRUCTION-SERVICES 141 IR 5 3:.3-3:-..7,-.-. • 107374 - ETHEL HASMA/JOHN L. EDINA S59.94 LIABILITY CLAIM • 107375 LA NOTTE CHEMICAL PRODUCTS $110.29 CHEMICALS 63.7• .mT.. RTPRN4a 107377 M.V. LAWMASTER 6 CO., INC. $7.246.26 SOIL TESTING ' 107378 LEADER PARTNERSHIP T133.000.00 CONNECTION FEE REFUND 9 ° 167380 LEE 4.40 CONSULTING ENGR: $28,903.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-33 ' 107381 LEEDS S NORTHRUP $262.00 INSTRUMENT PART 107383 LE ROT CRANDALL S ASSOC. $609.50 GEOSECHNICAL SERVICES 107384 LIMITOROUE CORP. $1.081.00 MECHANICAL PARTS RTr Veore 107386 R.P. LIND$TROM. INC. 56.535.2E CONSULTING SERVICES - RIR A RASTER PLAN 107387 LOS AN6 EL ES COUNIY BANITATION t24S 4S90.00 - POOLED OMISSIONS ESTINATIF PROGRAM M.0.12-13-89 RR e.J.<iV". r6, Af66.�• JeuT"ITAT. RtNP1•..a_ _ ' 107389 NBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $2,041.45 OCEAN MONITORING 107390 "PS $312.70 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES L',Z RIMPT iF4 X _ 107392 MA LC OLN P1SN�E j IN t: S13itsiai ENGINEERING SERVICES M.0.7-12-89 2 101393 MARVAC ELECTRONICS 1151:TE - INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES A01354 MATT . hH2ORf tur. lc.nAN 3c wrpeurcn. PART¢ ^ 10739B HCHAHAN DESK INC. $133.88 FILING CABINETS -N - 107396 MCMAS7ER-CARR SUPPLY CO. $906.31 TOOLS 69 iwR7R11WNT RRPATRR ]a ` 107398 METER CRAFT INC. $47.24. ELECTRIC REPAIRS 107399 MICROA6E COMPUTER 1891.96 'OFFICE EQUIPMENT LR-MO IYMPUTRR'SnITEARR 147401 MIDA INDUSTRIES. INC. $7,764.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 3-7-4 107402 SERPENTIX AND/ 53.568.3E MECHANICAL PARTS . 9R.PM TAR 4ftRRTree 107404 MORGAN CRANE CO.. INC. S310.51 TRUCE PARTS 107405 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES $137.91 PUBLICATION 1DL4Dfi NATIONAL 1RFORHATIOw DATA CYR. 533.45 PUBLICATION 107407 NATIONAL LUMBER 3381.14 HARDWARE ` 107408 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES. INC. $11.712.64 CONSTRUCTION 5-37-2 10ISO wen nuu e4F FTY rnuNrl. 1250..On IIOISreertnu 107410 BUST K. NEUBERG CONST4 CO: $2,118,932.10 CONSTRUCTION PI-33 107411 NEWPORT ELECTRONICS 366.39 INSTRUMENT REPAIR OM2 CHARLES NICHOLS _ lATA02 MEETING-sXPBNS. 107413 NORTH SUPPLY $281.73 COMMUNICATION PASTS 41 107414 FRED ONBRIEN $372.25 MEETING EXPENSE OF / 11.415.25 OFFICE FIRMNITImF 107416 OR SYSTEMS CO. S89.240.03 CHLORINE M.O.1-14-90 107417 ORANGE BEARING. INC. *147.30 MECHANICAL PARTS 1 NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL ( PROCESSING PATE 5/30/9U PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 rAllwTv MTTAIION GISTRIrTc BE nRANGF rnllNTV CLAIMS PAID 06/06/90 POSTING DATE 06/06/90 ANLNO. NFxnno AMnU T ___BFSrRIPTION 107410 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY $201.80 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 811C8-PAex ' 101420 ORANGE COUNTY CHENICAL CO. $930.39 HYDROCHLORIC ACID ' 16742I DRANGE VALVE 6 FIITINB CO. 62.021.47 PITTINDE o. P4Vtrr ILP G 6O RECIALTS.-GASES r 107423 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $9,312.52 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP IRBO8ARC3 ' 107424 PSOC(POOL SUPPLY OF D.C.) S70.92 BUILDING MATERIALS RTVUMEm ..VAIR. 107426 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO, 6905.23 SAFETY SUPPLIES ' 107421 . PACIFIC BELL -1741.47 TELEPHONE SERVICES 61"Pte HILL ONLYOLP ADDITIONS U-1 • 107429 PHOTO 6 SOUND CO. 5164.15 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 107430 PIMA SRO SYSTEMS. INC. $43,962.05 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88 EARDWevP 101432 POLYPUREI INC. $11,236.31 POLYMM H.O.1-10 90.8-9-89 107433 PONTOM. INDOSIRIES. INC. 9692.35 INSTR@4m ROVERrtr.Tr 2l.. TP. ' 107435 POWER SYSTEMS S972.00 ENGINE REPAIR 107436 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $36.00 ICE m B 107430 - PULS AFEEGERf.NA $1.700.00 MECHANICAL PSERV Z l01439 R.B.P.- ASSOCIATES 1L.700.00 BNCIRBEBING BCRYIC88 - CONST8UCTION IN$PED. M AFFAIR CCI 107441 RECYC. INC. $30,380.00 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88 107442 RED WING SHOES $352.63 SAFETY SHOES 1TRTr NESSO n ' 107444 ', REMEDY TEMP f123.04 rEIIDORARY SERVICES 1J'1 107445 THE REPUBLIC BUPPLJ CO{' 1151,58 PLITIMGB 6 MyFoa _ 107447 RICHARDS. VATSON 8 GERSHON $3,521.46 LEGAL SERVICES 5-1.-86 107448 J. R. ROBERTS CORP. S5.681.64 CONSTRUCTION J-7-4 FR iS fiV9.4LP.1% FVINSTPNrTTOx I-11 21 I07450 J. R. ROBERTS $201,113.65 CONSTRUCTION J-20 107451 ROBINSON FERTIL12EN CO. $3.943.00 CHEMICALS RNTRIMNT ,MPLTRC 107453 ROTANIUM PRODUCTS CO. $1.430.09 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 107454 RUSSELECTRIC $150.50 ELECTRIC PART ' 107456 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. S66.40 PARTS CLEANER 107457 SANCON ENSINEERING . INC. $2,100.00 - MANHOLE COVER REPLACEMENT ' 1Il215R RANYA INA_ELPCtR If NOTORK '455.31 SLEF.'TRTD xRYRR 107459 SCHULER ENGINEERING CORP. $171.792.02 CONSTRUCTION P1-27-162 107460 SCHULTZ MECH. CONTRACTORS. INC $1.736.00 MECHANICAL PARTS 107462 SEAL ENGINEERING CO. *217.38 PUMP PARTS 107463 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $769.09 NECRANICAI PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/39190 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CLAIMS PAID 06/06/90 POSTING DATE 06106/9O ' 307464 SMYPARN WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC 21.595.50 PHYSICAL EXAMS ' PRESENTATION AIDS C ' 107466 Skith-EMERY CO. iS.042i00 SOIL TESTING 14.0.6 14-80 197467 SOFT.WAREHOUSE 873,31 COMPUTER.PARTS ' SOLiOTTNr N 0 b td-R9 .•' 107469 SOLAR TURBINES INTERNATIONAL $449.16 GENERATOR REPAIR ' 10T470 SO. COAST AIR QUALITY $9.001.00 APPLICATION PEES RIIrR PARTS- 107472. SOUTHERN CALIF..EbISON CO. i108iS33.79 POMSR I 107473 SOUTHERN COUNTIES DI L.CO. ,: ,3733.98 DIESEL PURL ' 107475 WESTALLOY INC. 51.625.35 W.LDINC SUPPLIES 1 ' 107476 STAR TOOL S SUPPLY CO. $1,414.50 TOOLS ART ' 10747E SUNSET FORD is $9.8A TROCR-PARTS 107479- SUPER THEM CORP �; x , S1i447.65: CHEMICALS H . ' 10]411 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL. INC. S21.061.03 RAROWARE 107482 TCH ASSOCIATES 3382.49 LAB SUPPLIES ITTX 107484 .. `TRANSER fipt} CORPS �' ' .' T' 3406.-0i,. COMPU'TSR SOPI7IAIIE 2 fOT9S5 TRAVEL fAMC ,T 1,080.00 TRAVEL SERVICES H.DIi-ib-BS 107487 J.G. TU CNER 6 SON, INC. S637.36 INSTRUMENT PARTS 107480 TWINING LABORA70RIES OF $909.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.6-I4-89 IT D ' 107490 UNION SIGN C6. 3E76yi4' SIGNS; 157491 UN1tE0 ARCEL SE 9 C , a137.47. PARCEL.BBRVtas " " 'ciaimeanv 107493 UPJOHN HEALTHCARE SERVICES $136.00 CPR TRAINING 307494 VYR SCIENTIFIC $4,243.75 LAB SUPPLIES 107496 - VALLEY .8 CITIES SUPPLY CO. 3592:82 '. FITTINGS 101497 VALLEY OEtROTt DIESEL . ag2.1H TRUCE PARTS ' PaVL_Ara9h.rv...._ ie. -"'vwwr 107499 VEHICLE SPRING SERVICE $319.06 SPRING REPAIR ' 101500 VIN INO INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $1.721.80 SAFETY SUPPLIES LLAI I, ' 10750E CARL WARREN L CO. i004.39 IN.ORANGE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 107503 VATER POLLUTION CONTROL i3B7.50 PUBLICATION u I07505 WESTERN PACIFIC EQUIPMENT CO. $458.79 TRUCE PARTS 107506 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY $51.690.35 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-9-89 NIB I 107508 NOR OHS PE CY CORP. " -ED ALA3.13 CO!@UTER 90P1YAR6 107509 NEROR-CORP. $1.248.39 COPIER LEASHS FU( 1 9199 - JT DIST MORNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5130/9R P46E 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 iSANIIAIIIN-OJSTR;LI—OF--ORANGE COUNTI CLAIMS PAID 06/06/99 POSTING DATE D6/06/90 JI-.14 J. •uoD= ' 107510 ZIEBARTH AND ALPER $715,117.40 CONSTRUCTION PI-34-1 1 r ' TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 96/06/90 -------------- f10.Al U002.57 -SUMMARY ANDIINI' 02 OPBR PIING 3.769.59 02 CAP PAC FUND 214,147.26 03 CAP FAD FUND 14U,000 O6 l x 1 h,.6 15 OPell FDxo 3,do7,76 'C�� :�. '� . r, ii 07 0PER FURO 5:405.89 07 CAP PAC POND ¢ ,a y 549,298.25 ' fIl PiVd f F .T § 9 .C,: # b n r tyyDxaw:' +It X PIl CAP PAC .. I .. ;7$49 014 CAP FAD S , .Y'',Ce M eF'* tIG95,e9}fp a '*az c_, yNOi�l 0566 CAP PAC FUND 12.662.64 0667 OPPJI FUND 1,977.49 .. yII&L4 UrAK FUND I J2 OPeR POND r '' i,S ,q` "°•- 91e117 JT WRITING CAPITAL FUND 116,375.26 A ' FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/13/90 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNT-T-4A10I7 AIJDN-0.44LR1CIS-0S_-0RANBE�O+ NiT CLAIMS PAID 66/20100 . POSTING DATE 04/20/90 uN.L.NO. YCNOOA iAOUN! ^CACRIA7fON IOT535 A 8 0 INDUSTRIES S1,684.06 TOOL BOX MODIFICATION 61533 A 506.00 ASPHALT STRIPING -107537 ' AIR PRODUCTS S CNENiCAI INC. 0L5.296.00 DETCEN US SISTER DAN AGA98116M1 M D S 9-89 +. / 107538 LEASING ASSOCIATES/ALL37ATE 91#131.32 AUTO LEASES 1.7q3q :II 1AA ...R.VJ.O '280.97 CBLORIRATtON-PARTO "h:: 107540 ALLYA37E SERVICES 12,430.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICE 107541 ALTA SALES. INC. $141.79 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES Ae • WJLLCAELiLEE�P0RT9 _ in4 SO TRUCK PAR 10T513 ROBCD INC. i, , AllR If AN SEAL - l356.49 BEALB 6 GASKETS 107544 ANEPiCAM TECH {CALSUPPLV i1.B39.39 CAMERAS 1549 197+78 cop.BR-LRA888 107546 ANACOMP $117.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES 107547 ANIXTER - WIRE S CABLE $285.79 - COMMRWICATIONS CABLE ^ •NTNONI'- RECN._.L-RACHIl US 63 107549 APCO VALVE A PRIMER CORP 9143i7B tJ fin ? PITTINOS 107550 '.A PFLE ONE lli} 1129 ry 4I TSMPOAARY SERVICES. 9q T 4A. 4rr dCiA lnb9. .Nf� ��1i39a1B �_• +• -�;"' IRIISOAN--po-S.rd 107552 ARI20NA INSTRUMENTS CORP. $63.00 RBNTAL EQUIPMENT 107553 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING 3655.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.6-14-89 X I07345 , AUTOMOTIVAN E [O UIPA 'BEN4� SE '50 c TRUCK PAAMAIN rM.O.it�so 2 3075S6 C }NDUSTR AL 3UI�hLTi INC. s3ppE'•60o £`' CABLE 13en8A. aE V'I F A}37.754 $7 '< ^'s ORTT RERoyAL R a 1-Ii LhX _ 107558 BANK OF AMERICA-C.A.S.C. $14.51 BOND 6 COUPON COLLECTION —4 107559 P.Y. SAROTTI AND ASSOC. 94,012.50 - CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PI-34-2.P2-37 LU nw 101561 BA%TCR 8OIEN}{FIy PRODUCTS - SE1BO'i�}i 4 ,- ^= LAS SUPPLIES sale " N 30756E BA7CE33 stAT1 o�+ER� - Li7l.GE , OFFICE EDPPLIES ' 6Y enAra4 oE.ININt i'f Y.AR hF1 a AA ' ' k73A061AI4 BNCINEERIN�'�=^oriu b6e en_da_e 107564 BENZ ENGINEERING. INC. $1,015.56 MECHANICAL PARTS 117165 BLACK BOX CORP S903.01 COMPUTER HARDWARE INS afnn-eF 06BE88®.fAl�DISTRI91R3GN 101567 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE S149.98 RADIATOR.REPAIR ' . 107568 BON-A-RUES $13E 46 TRUCK PARTS ` 7 499 "ARDWN_&-CALDYrI I tAaAm 11WA i9B653 _ -mcumEBIN0-58R1Q^EB P1 9S "_�:19 107570 BUILDING NEWS. INC. 3253.30 PUBLICATION 307571 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES. INC. $870.00 SURVEYING SERVICLS RES 88-71 12H22 GAR7_G._S,LBEFn AL -13 107573 CPT CORP. / SUMMIT SOLUTIONS 1884*4a OFFICE SUPPLIES 107574 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH, INC. 116.81 LAD SUPPLIES ALIAOLi 1ND. --- 1.596..31_— INSTRUMENT 107576 CALIF. ASSOC. OF SANITATION S440.00 MEETING EXPENSE M.0.6-16-89 107577 CAPITAL WESTWARD S2.700.29 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES LBBHNICATIONc 9Y9TPM _ 8. n99_ 107579 CENTRUN NORTH PHASE IT 0114115.00 REFUND CONNECTION TAX 107580 CHALLENGE BEARING S INC. IMPLY 6149.33 RBCKAHICA6 SUPPLIES NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL \ PROCESSING DATE 6/13/90 PAGE 2 r REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNIY SANITATInN CLSTRI CLAIMS PAID 06/20I90 POSTING DATE 06/20790 1WARRANT Md. VENDOR A06UNT GERCAEPT1hN ; 5�1 107581 YARDLEY INSTRUMENTS 2223'16 x INSTRUMENT PUTS v ' 107583 CHURCH ENGINECKINO. INC. S40129 00" ENGINEERING BSRVICRSS A 1 7 r ' 1070Eq. CLARN CONSULTANTS l040,06 1 RNCIN¢ERINC 9EBVIOSR, }3R.54 vnvmv PwFNRR ,.itiMe.:S 107586 CLEMENT COMMUNICATIONS. INC. $54.73 SAFETY SUPPLIES IOT567 CLOW S CLOW. INC. $4,313.00 REFUND CONNECTION M i P.RR MECHANICAL YARTB 107509 ," Coop RESSOA CO"PONENIS OF CALIF bgiO06,26 ' 'AA} FARTS T NF. i 107390 EOMNELL B:MA. ►ARTS / D iV. 3384.44? 1EOCR PART9 tx }�i+,},�r�'}� .}iPl�,�s� , - 5.00 r a.vMA4O amrii.iAA.a�: .dXr�*r.a. 107592 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO S1.970.94 / CHLORINE M.0.10-11-87 107593 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS $785.84 BLUEPRINTING M.0.1-I0-90 107595 EDx7ROL.DA7A' EDR . 10 $ d -; Id -C., FIa IRSTRIRiaNi' rvil r7,� 10T59G .� FDsTA EGA Al 4 fL # r, r t ' , 3 ,� 4. ,r,`i '�'M1 4 �4'� €�,;, s rna+ 101598 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 11,655.60 '. ELECTRIC SUPPLIES I 107599 CAL WATER $204.86 RENTAL EQOpmw X 107601 <,.CAL NANSftfitr t11 - •" Ck 9040-W gppURL}OiT}bN ;" - n a 4�'�'"'kS _ io7Go; },>'.;$ ATE F t{,LIFoRNI�I, t.. n,y�,^ 3D1D 1 ORE;tRdbEe � r '. CO = 107604 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 91.815.89 TRUCE TIRES 10 ENTAL 7605 DE ANZA CORPORATION $150.00 EQUIPMENT R Ib 107607 '"'DIFILI PO ASS CI 'E �kg� z, u 1!! rji 57 �^ ,PRINTING ty n I OTdOB i. D}SCO MINT 'tORPAIJi d ifuN�'*^y*''.,f hit , { i t� x bFPICE DI ''� i ax ry y5 t AM MCA iftAld ph, 107610 DON JOSE 17 S278'75 REFUND USER FEE OVERPATM8HT 107611 JOSEP14 S. DUDOR. P.E. $900.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 107filz pull, L 107613 'DUNN EDWARDS,CORP4 v6: g110 46 rx,I°' uT ';'`' " FAINT'SUFPLIBS "' r,4; i �..t 5 107614 . '.E NA SER910ESf INtk ll�0} 9 �{ gy`5.���y. �?. ENGENERR}NO � I CAeINANi. 501 ti+E'`IAGSS'. 62 ��. OFp$A eUVP14RA' 107616 ECOANALYSIS. INC $1.794.87 OCEAN RESEARCH 107627 ECOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING R ANALY 15.375.00 DOW RESEARCH 10708 ENVIRONMENTAL 207619 FST SAND AND .GRAVEL} INC, 5289:94. BUILDING MATERI J Fy;t t pxt 197620 PACILITIES SUPPORT CO,. 03.30 SMALL MARDNARM 127621 X 00-10 DEFERRED CGNP RTRTNEMOTEGN 107622 JOHN D. FALKENSTEIN P.E. 53.637.50 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-4. J-20.3-17 107623 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. f241.50 AIR FREIGHT 6 86 PROP 1076YD FILTER SUPPLY CC, .1316.19 GO MATI611 PARTi 107626 FISCHER A PORTER COA $34301686 INSTRUN!NT PARTS - ,k,s r : w I FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/13/90 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 TR1[TS OF ORANGF COUNTY ° CLAIM$ PAID 06/20/90 POSTING DATE 06/20/99 's 'MANAk T NO, VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION , ICT627 FLUID TECH $1.665.19 MECHANICAL PARTS 197629 OUN TAINVALLEY CAMERA S^i -$348}11 ° 107630107 2, I; F DUNTAIN.YNTr,VALLEY PAINT •$T0d.3B PAINT SUPPLIES 107632 A.F. FREY S105.00 DEYERRED ROMP DISTRIBUTION 107633 CITY OF FULLERTON S52.90 WATER USEAGE 107634 - GENERAL 1UNDER ERMCO. go, 2-9 TkL2PR0{iE SERV1089 '� °� 107636 .6E098E.LEECN L As3be . TES M f`,-° / -iA 9179 INSTRUMENT Bi1PPLIE3 f 107638 'GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION $800.00 STREET SWEEPING SERVICES 107639 GREENVIEW DATA. INC. $72.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 10T641 'PNARMAN PURq 0i 4 5++� I y 2B}i1 I't'"3 2UNP PA9T3 � 4< ' Id7642 m •`;f, RE l� IIARPdR '. �%f t , I ,.M.si.-y�a`id�f{9S '4 ..y dEP6RBdd COMP DISTRIBUII 107644 HARCROS CHEMICALS INC. 1154.00 LAB SUPPLIES ( 107645 HATCH A MIRK. INC. $616.25 MECRANICAL PARTS m i 1077c 4$ M;-WA4 SAFETY ENTA 6i CV , ` -2t 9#9d 2#600 " ' CONSTRUCTION 1,1 1 N 113.11.,A —119FALo bAM - r ,� z ��,e, d CONrb . . CD 1176510 MOUSE OF BATTERIES $745.31 BATTERIES '( 107651 R.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. 11,786.08 PAINT SUPPLIES OU - /07633 '�—INOUSTAIAL "AEgqgEDA OOO Cikx + d"1,�I� 9P112b Cokb2clD EtA�", i r 107684 "!..,fibFILi6-bE6REMDNTi"1Ci r " a. i ' `A1B A46 ',�. "„�R ' s , PRBIDST ,W ,..,,tr; 107656 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $212.99 TRUCE PARTS 117657 INTERNATIONAL SENSOR TECH. 190.73 INSTRUMENT 107659 GREAT:WESTERN SANITARY 3WPPA f -m r n I 17d666 1 +� r I . JANI'r6RTAL OdPPLfEdy + <^' `y'T" 107660 JAYS CATERING - < ' S32bs25 + Y M6BTINC r. ,, . . x .. w..,. . 107662 JENSEN TOOLS A ALLOYS $1114.77 INSTRIUmarr/TOOLS 107663 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $505.07 ELECTRIC PARTS -.107665 kANAN BEARINGS A SGONVIIERUPPLYSUP-eltr; 590�59 FITTINGS - c`o 107666 MANER COMPANY fd75N8 TOULS ' L : 59i 12 RE-DID DRPA YAEY iiivBobAi{.i1 S: .k . 107668 RAS SAFETY PRODUCTS $30.76 SAFETY SNDE9 107669 KELLEY BLUE BOOK "T.00 PUBLICATION ' 107671 MARTIN KORbICRi SR 'x S90256440 CONSTRUCTIOR SRRVICed Ig-1=12;9A N",4 307672 It LANNA$IER 6 CO., INC. $550.80 BOIL T28T1Mb M.6.6-1419 rt O NO 9199 JT Di ST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING'DATE ' 6/13/90 PAGE 4 i REPORT NUMBER AP43 \ CnUNITE nveu CLAIMS PAID 06%20/90` P03TINO DATE 0112b/9d': l'951 / ' 107673 JUDY LEE - $84.15 MILEAGE EXPENSE 107675 LE ROY CRANDALL L ASSOC. 't4.660.98 BNGINBANIRG 50 38A91I�A i..�yy t( IlyuP%2 ql ��." / • 107676 LOCAL AGENCY $2 .00 L6PCO EsR +` a ({� 50 °ROTOCRAPAl0 dRA9triMd-°"�` � ,4,s�P A �' , 10167E M-T-M $2914502 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 167679 MACOMCO $187.20 SERVICE AGREEMENT Be__ MAI EDLM PTR / 107691 MARSHALL MAINT PROOUCi10N5 T80 00 '" y tr y �:c�y+ 6APeTF X1I1E0$ .,3jLt R" ' Jr "z 107682 NARYAC ELECiRONI6$ r $S.1] { a�¢'=yT:�, lSITRON2M'I,' IiPPLTt/14 n.l' 1. B3 d t., ., y .i 2. 307684 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. $148.34 MOCBAim PARTS 2. 107605 MEASUREMENT CONTROL SYS. INC. $316.63 FITTINGS 107697 0 tCROADE CONPUTEff ^`r +hi a�es4 " 4}QQTAItt}�=#j E" x,, t CONPuTAR PAATE 4 ki{,O 3N'.8•v � '+" 1076Bd '� ;.MINE SAFETY PPLL A11 E0 `Ei t "« +' -". AS r T OATBTF $OPPLIed .�4ti' 'Y ZA&Sr.« . AN3TOP AL 107190 MOTTON SALT AND/OR - $440.45 SALT IS7691 MOTION INDUSTRIES. INC. $110.16 MECHANICAL PARTS e Mnmen m 107693 x'-NDr0R0LA cELLNL(.� 3 ft t 'v -. '- n- l"7s3f 6ia uLAA'�fh R'D�f i C. 1gT694 « "NEE �` ME It ,trn, r '_�. � . I�fi d; DPPIOd �!it§LEed�� ;� `.•�" p 1 107696 NATIONAL INFORMATION DATA CTR. $53.45 PUELICNTION , -T.. 107697 NATIONAL LUMBER $100.62 HARDWARE --A Al ENY 'mr BM107699 'CITT'OE NEYPORT SEACM+ (i , ^ + 4L0-e@'7 rRATER if§&IGt1t u'g a fx CZ longq aax.s,/eQLA9 Dis903AL DD h �', . - I oADO .. - asR 33N dE NICE /tV1 k , e. nnnuRXr$n 11..:.v4einG 6ER04}e6 A`�w'Ps. +tr �� s. t r 4 PAt+AA' Z :�` petyhLA3g -�,r.;�'..'9-�3 .'; -3 107702 OX SYSTEMS CO. $45.287.70 CHLORINE M.O.2-14-90 107703 ORANGE BEARING. INC. f563.S5 BARIUM 197705 :ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PAd S•Cot ✓ ^'r� v .N 113AiJ2 v.4 4{1RIiCR PAA7B yJ 307706 `ORANGE VALVE L FI7TtM0,tai Tv. $43d.39 PITIIN00' - 710i :nxy rm aFndte . r,x+ i r + -! eA{ 10770E COUNTY OF ORANGE 110,522.01 SERVICE AGREEMENTS - RADIO EQUIPMENT 117709 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $6,669.96 "THEME WORKERS CORD INSURANCE ' 9d1 °LLILO1NC.usee 3077I1 PACIFIC PARTS -. 't1i700.00 - . y RECISTRAYIQN pr rayh 10771E , PACIFIC SAFETY EOUtiNENT CO. <#1d243.S8 SAFETY SUPPL10S ]-713 OA[TFL [Fa1IN f 1, 1 Ie Ad ev+v°unvv e°,Vtn g 107714 PALLETS B ACCESSORIES CO. Sl,519.55 PALLETS 107715 PEACNTR EE BUSINESS FORMS iTB.00 PARKING TAGS 107717 NOT PENDERORAFT 3A4Bt 0 bETEPilD COMP DISTRIBUTIOR 10771E PM070 180UND CO. 3266.P0 RENTAL EQUIPMENT L_ � l FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/13/90 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COx NTr SANIIATIAM DIRT AWS-OF—ORANGE rmaTr ' CLAIMS PAID 06/20/90 POSTINS DATE 06/20/9S . .H YAROAUT xn. Mrhppe - AMOUNT OESCUGSI-0N �r r ' 107719 PIMA SRO SYSTEMS. INC. $43.647.15 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-I1-88 20 p' ALNS_,,T...EUALU6_NAR8WARE .1A 6V24 BE 107721 POLFPUPE, INC. f 51362/70 PDL7N8RE M.G.I-lO-90.8-9-69 N „, 107722 - PREFERRED:PA VINE COW INC. �1,500.00 ASPHALT PA91NG "x'', IA7711 mi,,,n OR HIM3 SL-0S11, 107724 THE PROJECTS SOLUTION CO. $3.975.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.8-10-88+, 107725 PROMAC U.S.A.. INC. $102.13 MACHINE REPAIR 9 107727 AECYC. INCi fA91020100 SLUDGE SEMOTAL N.0 5 1 ' 107728 RED WINO".SHOES l101t96 07"9 A.A. At vp tltNYir SeAAjf A,Mf x. u, n�v.�i:inB*kns8 s ,j .' ifi 107130 THE RESISTER $1.422.09 NOTICES 6 ADS 107731 REMOTE METER RESETTING SYSTEM $5.000.00 POSTAGE ' 107732 THE NEE RI Af su ' 107733 "' ROACH WATER tEc NGLO Vi INCS •4' ` sii lA to AtC61 PRRTP` 107734 J. RA ROBERTS rSAT. A lP15o 177i00 h a yl'' CORSTROC}ROM J-if 4'x T� f ' TTt9 AnRT x;Mu EEAtI'fite >b- AiO7aS a I`' ' TY^Scr1r ^M • �-K.t m4 .,. ,. "�y.:..:.. 107736 S 6 J CHEVROLET 531.91 TRUCK PARTS 107737 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. S132.80 PARTS CLEANER m 21 X 107739 eAN7AANp YAt}ERSNEQ PRdQJEtt '" AP OAPiSi r a �df REFUND OABE PEE by�gpATMSN'l' r¢s x 107746 SCIENCE A6PL}GGAt1bN34fyt OL °,�,,J557�� H' WIS9bi (Qj iY ' DcaAN AAld6iMD ii�d 6-i4-E4 a f 0T7Af AEA rnAAi nritau6 z •.aT2 4l• ! ;eS=O iLsG d '' r. i .uwins'bmNi51�N Jsx•df: tO7742 CITY OF SEAL BEACH SI23.50 WATER USEAOE --A 3 107743 SHAMROCK SUPPLY S702.30 HARDWARE AA sMLTMeEMEAr rn_ aR _ _ bo 1077A3 SMITH PIPE 8 SUPPLY{ INC " �' ' 9 3 S 9 i 66^' 4JA, PifR}PfRG SDPP6f2i 107746 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORPI < A103.64 71AT ROPY uAEERDIL9r :r. .;i74,y e' .xCe. v:.:, MAPUTRi RnilVARR 107748 SOIL AND TESTING ENGINEERS $293.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89 107749 SOLAR TURBINES INC. $804.28 GENERATOR REPAIRS 07750 smsTRrRN rq TF_ FnTCnN CO. -26 is 0_sA Pnvv& ' 107751 'ISO. CAL: GAS CO. 'ARi 513.16 f' RATURA}.'GAB ' !• 107752 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO, A9,625:O4 -0IBBLL PUEL jMI -SPArrSArFR STATERS, I C. aui-en wrel pHTPN¢ME 107754 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $6.75 WATER DISPENSER 107755 STAMEN Z. SPASSOFF. P.E. $4.320.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3-19-I.J-19-2 ]j5A STAR TOOL 9 $uooTr tn. aP eq6-os 'M1N4S 107757 STEINY AND COMPANY, INC. 11,450400 SAFETY REPAIRS.: - 107750 STERLING ART A154.t9 GRABfC SUPPLIES •�+ 1E7259 SON-BELL-LANDSCAPE A RAINY. _ALRA1.On CONTRACT,GROUNDSNEENINO N.O.6-9 89_ 107760 SUPELCO. INC. $110.28 CHEMICALS 107761 SUPER CHEM CORP $1.498.12 CHEMICALS 62 tOKYINFNNI ATR lIMH_ C- aL.,30 L_9L TM1S 107763 J.'WAYNE SYLVESTER t4ii.08 REMIND EXPENSE 107764 TAYLOR-DUNN - S302.81 ELECTRIC CART PARTS (r fix. D NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL t PROCESSING DATE 6115/90 PAGE fnt REPORT NUMBER APq} COUNTY SANITATION 06/ 0190 POSJIF_�DATEF rnUNTV 6/2019 CLAIMS PAID 06/20/90 POST ING DATE 06/20/9d �- r , N0. WENOOA AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 4 + r' • 107765 TECH SCIENCE $325.54 MECHANICAL PARTS IEB"AR CORP NY 3155,63 LA 107767 TELEOYRE'MONAqCM 6 ROBBER $551.47 TRMCE PARTS r • 101768 TH€RMO .ANALYTICAL+ .)NCt/NORCAL 1190.00 LAB SBRVIC8 8 1y1 • 12A200..0A TRAVSA RICy 107770 TRUCK S AUTO SUPPLY. INC. $827.47 TRUCK PARTS 107771 TWINING LABORATORIES OF S4.418.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89 7172� TYPE FACTORY S214-Al PRINTING. 10T113 . 'UNoE�L- l2T3i06 UNLEADED DA90 If184T 1' 1 � " 1077T1 UMIROTAL CHEMICAL, 12.800:00 rx RBEUWD USSR FEE 4isiAi;"t THEUN.APDAt ..' FFICe Bi1PPi{F4 =t�reR 107776 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $132.95 PARCEL SERVICES 107777 MILLAR ELEVATOR COMPANY S326.15 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE +� 107780SUPPLISS VALLftt0f 71E8EEUVPL7 E8Y '`U t a j;4,1 l54 Txi9 't {?,;k.e `, 2LIrs TT1p00 / 107182 PALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 1294.03 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 107783 JOHN R. NAPLES 6933.75 DOOR CONTROL CONSULTANT X 1p7785 "'YE$JER ;STALE Eyy E q F s i 0¢¢f F i CAU82itl eODA 0 6.0 9 ''q rA Z ' 107786 vYi LLDA �A6s IAti " T ' q t ; , . .. �.:+'"rb,�51Oi. 1 ' Jt` WINRBRINO a g A + q �• 1 41. I iY . .t',rt i,`u. 107788 ROURKE 6"WOODRUFF S03.688.92 LEGn SERVICEI M.0.6-4-89 H 107789 REA L. KANDERS $259.00 REFUND LAPCO PER rA ' 101791 .",':gE0M0 7AM LE E ? 7 P 41.0 '><J '��^ ALVE 79 ,mm � ,., f 7 107792E- u+xg ,161793 RIC � iaE z'* L'h 4' CHANT 107794 CHARLES E. SYLVIA $954.00 DIRECTORS COMP TOTAL N 1MB P b 0919 T 1 L �^.§ �,iL671 ' �e 7 tY�N?rhy �t 4Y UI5 V L_ FUND NO 9199 - IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/13/90 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INS PAID 0 0 90 POSTING DATE 0 20 90 d SUMMARY AMOUNT 11 OPER Fin 9 ( ' • /2 OPER FUND 0,765.33 y /2 CAP PAC PUNO 14:088.12 Z 0. T. /3 CAP FAC FUND 22,556.07 T. /5 OPER FUND 5,342.50 F5 DAY rAC FUND r I6 OPER FUND 189.25 /7 OPER PUNO 0,005.59 I 977 $ 7" 11 WAY FAW FUND 111 OPER FUND 6,462.56 /14 OPER FUND 887.25 Sf� /566OPBR PIINb 11 _{tf0 1"K Z U$.� ..I�: /7A1CAP 6 o.ER FUND r .v ( r CORF 331,416.17 fll SELF FUNDED WORKERS cm INSURAIICE PUND 9,006.36 x ►=i N 1. +1 S s sl�S kj� is 'N:, �j,�'" a� 1 4 .',6t'�i'�4����Ffl�r]; �� +a W 0 � I bCl R+{ N BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127 a 10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County.California Fountain valley,CA 9272BA127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 JOINT BOARDS AGENDA SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 8, 1990 - 7: 30 P .M. RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 A minute excerpt has been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item No. 4, it is appropriate to receive and file said excerpt: DISTRICTS 7 6 14 (4 ) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpt from the City of Irvine re election of mayor and appointment of alternate Director and seating a new member of the Board: (*Mayor) Districts Active Director Alternate Director 7 a 14 Sally Anne Sheridan* Barry Hammond (ADDITIONAL ITEMS LISTED ON PAGES 2 6 3 ) SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS - 8/08/90 The following items are hereby submitted to the Boards of Directors for discussion and action at the regular meeting date and time set forth above. The need to take the recommended action arose subsequent to the agenda being posted on August 2, 1990. .� In order for action to be taken on this item, the Boards of Directors shall first determine by a two-thirds vote of the Board members, or if less than two thirds of the members are present, a unanimous vote of those members present, that the need to take this action arose subsequent to the agenda being posted. If the Supplemental Agenda includes Stems for the Joint Boards and/or one or more individual District Boards, each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District. (17) ALL DISTRICTS Ot er- u�ss and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any: (a) Report of the General Counsel and consideration of motion to receive and file General Counsel's Memorandum dated August 6, 1990 (Memorandum attached) (b) Roll call vote authorizing consideration of items (c) through (g) listed below which arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda and which require action at this time. �./ (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint for Damages for Negligence-Premises Liability; Negligence-Products Liability; Breach of Warranty; Strict Liability; Fraudulent Concealment, Manuel Riveramelo vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 564614, relative to alleged injuries to a District employee as a result of exposure to chemicals in the performance of his work; and authorize the Districts' General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. (d) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint for Damages for Negligence-Premises Liability; Negligence-Products Liability; Breach of Warranty; Strict Liability; Fraudulent Concealment, Robert Caucedo vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 564616, relative to alleged injuries to a District employee as a result of exposure to chemicals in the performance of his work; and authorize the Districts' General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. [ITEM (17) CONTINUED ON PAGE 3] �� -2- SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS - 8/08/90 (17 ) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued) (e) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint for Damages for Negligence-Premises Liability; Negligence-Products Liability; Breach of Warranty; Strict Liability; Fraudulent Concealment, Jeffrey Lynn Jones vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 564617 , relative to alleged injuries to a District employee as a result of exposure to chemicals in the performance of his work; and authorize the Districts ' General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. (f) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint for Damages for Negligence-Premises Liability; Negligence-Products Liability; Breach of Warranty; Strict Liability; Fraudulent Concealment, Frank Walton, Jr. , A Minor, by his Guardian ad Litem, Michelle Walton; Jennifer Walton, A Minor, by her Guardian ad Litem, Loris, Miller, vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 619476 , relative to alleged injuries to District employees as a result of exposure to chemicals in the performance of their work; and authorize the Districts ' General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. (g) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint for Damages for Negligence-Premises Liability; Negligence-Products Liability; Breach of Warranty; Strict Liability; Fraudulent Concealment, Lynn Redman vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 622192, relative to alleged injuries to a District employee as a result of exposure to chemicals in the performance of his work; and authorize the Districts' General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. �..i -3- --,,MEE-nNGDATE August 8, 1990 TIME 7:30 P.M. DWMIM 1-2-3-5.6.7, 11. 13 & 14 DISTRICT JOINT BOARDS (CRANQ ........WINNER...... (SMWVEF4 .................ALLEN ......... (EDGAR) ........PUCRErr...... (AGE) ......................ARNOW ....... (youm) ........Gmqu ....... (GREEN)....... ......� ... (ROTM..........STANTON ..... ((WED. ......:::::::.......W., MMICT 2 PIORV Y)....................GBH (mummEm) ................. .......... (HUNTER) .......PICM.ER ...... (UMN).................... CULVER (accar)......... ......... (P�Ern..................SommR (vEmAA) ........a*mw am ....JC QAAHCN. ..................GFWkWW....... (NOFJM ........GBH........ (CHESSEN) .................amaRw.......-le (YOUNG) ........oRmwer ........ (YOUNG) ...................GIUSEr (aRAH-&Q h.0 PIUMMER) ........ :le-p (CULVE) .......UMM .. (GRAHW ..................NW&COM......&e'— (WED..........NELSON:: lZVVAw...... WN - e MCKENROCE) ...NVATON...... C ( .. .. miz (sALnMNO ..... (Scorn ....................REAL ... (RARRERA) ...... CWED. ....................NELSON (ROTH)..... ....STANTON .....-2 — (ECKENRODE)...............MENTOR...... nISMICT (HUWrEF)...................PMLER ...... jQ6. 01AFG) .....................MCWER..... .Le (LUNEN)......... .........-Le — — 0AWWQ ....................POUS ........ .%C (VaES) .........smam .......JC — — (EDGAR).....................PONroUs .... (SHAME)......ALLEN ........✓ — — (EDGAR)....................PUCKETT ..... (ME)...........ARNOLD ......7!�; — — (STANTON) .......... (OREM B� (COX) ............... (mc,Rzy) :-cxrLim.... "NMNoND)........ (MAS( ..........CULVER. (MLES) ........... SEMEN .... MAHONEY)...... (sALGMwD SUM. (MMEM ......Gniffm....... (BARREFLA) :,:... .::::::: (yoUW) ........GMM ....... (Aa Rn .....................WANvow ..... .Ide (scor).........msmL ..........AC (IN I El)....................MAN ......... .,e (WEDIN)......... ..... 060 (WwLmw ..............mm ...... .ue (HUNTER) .......�M ...... (cNANW��RM4 :,W"m..... (RoTm.. ....... ✓ (BIGONGEF" (WAHLSTROW.::SYLM........ (NELSON)............. &mELO)...... .......klL, 9ASZLO) ................... ....... DISTFRCT JOREM....................MOKELL ....-le Y'LUMN030......HART.........-it- (COX)....*......SAMISCOM ......Q- (STANTON) ......ROM.........Jew DISTRICTS STAFF OTHER PART) ... Kum� MVESTER.........-k!f WOODRUFF - -Je (KRRYMAM:,.."..'WANNER.:::::-JLG SROM ............ .JgL' IDE........... -j6e (STANTON) ......morN......... .. ANDERSON ......... .lef ANWAR .......— DtSTFUCT7 QLXNSON ..........JC DMR ........-he DAWES............. .✓ M-EhUNG...... (GARRERA) HODGES ........... .�:- HOIIMMER..... PUMEME ::: HOUGH ....... eKuLwmR)..... .......... UNDER �Nowmo......- (YOR'NO) ....... ., NELSON............ ✓ .........(STANTON) ......ROM.........-t..r NimNoLs ........... .�w PF....... (MI D) .....SNSIMI -----!t' corm............. . (GREEM ........WwSi61....... STREED........... DISTRICT II VMENT ........... L5=E:::::,::JC VONLANGEN ....... WASON ....... IREEM ..... .JC "SOR............ YOUNG ....... (StLVA). WAS.........-J�-- )V�FA,� (Roan..........aANTam ......jN,- D[MICT 13 (81GONGER) %EDAA y(LCN&A C (NELSON) .......wEDW =STANTON) z.....ROTH......... RERAi ......SLIMMI ........M DISTRICT I (NXIER) ........SWAN..........IL — (NANNDND) EDGAxn ........ 0,�/ :ANTM) ......ROTH.... (BARMERA) ......ShUTH ........ jCk, 06NB'00 PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET IF YOU WISH YOUR NAME TO BE REFLECTED IN THE MINUTES, PLEASE SIGN IN COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY AUGUST 8, 1990 BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION FIRM Please Print Please Print S �Cwlif �Cr7lei�� � vw,i 8/08/90 JOINT MEETING NOTES #6(a) - Report of the Joint Chairman Vice Chairman Mahoney reported that Joint Chairman Catlin would not be attending the meeting that evening. He was going to come but the doctor recommended that he not do more than one big activity a day and he had already been to therapy that day. He had also attended the council meeting the previous night. He said he believed he would be back next month though. #6(b) - No report of General Manager #6(c) - Report of General Counsel The Districts' General Counsel reported on the two Memos in the Directors' folders relative to Universal Circuits, Inc. and Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson. Re UCI, they sold that enterprise and we have issued a permit to the new owners. There is still one outstanding matter of litigation, but the new owners have indicated that they are not going to close the sale until all outstanding warrants are taken care of. It should be taken care of in the next month or so. Re Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, there were two separate lawsuits. One challenged conditions of their permit and the other challenged the industrial waste ordinance. Both had CEQA challenges. We have successfully defended the actions the Districts took in November and January which were the principal Issues brought to trial last week. The Judgment ruled in our favor. We had pending motions for summary Judgments. The Judge saw everything our way and indicated that they had absolutely no case. Pending appeal , the case is closed. With regard to Supplemental Agenda Item #17, Mr. Woodruff referred to his attached Memorandum. These cases occurred quite a while ago. He said it is our opinion that they are very ill placed and not well founded. Three of the cases have been heard by Workers' Comp. Hopefully, these will be resolved shortly on procedural issues. He noted that if Directors had any questions, they should convene to closed session under item #17. Vice Joint Chairman Mahoney then congratulated Mr. Woodruff for a Job well done with regard to the Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson case. It was very important to the Districts. He added that the Directors like to read reports like that one. The General Counsel replied that Rutan d Tucker Joined with his firm and Dave Larson really pulled it together on the briefs, and he wanted to give credit to them for this success also. #14(a) - Salary Adjustments Vice Joint Chairman Mahoney reported that the salary adjustments recommended in the confidential packages mailed to Directors are not specifically listed as an Item on this agenda. However, they are considered to be approved when the Executive Committee report is approved under Item #14(a). He added that at the next meeting we wll have a full embodiment of the salary adjustments by resolution. This evening they would be approving the recommendations of the `� Executive Committee. #14(b)(1) - Appoint Merrill Lynch as Senior Manager/Underwriter It was moved and seconded to approve this item. Supervisor Stanton requested 1%m.i that his vote in opposition to the motion be recorded. He st-a ed—he was voting no for the reasons he stated at the Executive Committee meeting, because the County usually has two managers/underwriters. Asked why we didn't do that? Mahoney stated that the Executive Committee's recommendation is that we go with Merrill Lynch. Wedaa asked, how much money are we talking about in terms of dollars? Approximate amount in terms of the next 15 years. Was told $600 million. He said maybe we should rethink this. It was pointed out that the first issue will be considerably less, perhaps $100 million. We will be revisiting who the underwriter might be in the future. Wedaa commented that if we could get another pair of eyes and ears, maybe should think about it. The General Counsel commented re co-managers, we haven't taken any proposals for co-managers. Doubted if there would be any additional costs or savings. Peer Swan reported that on the first issue, we will be doing a lot of s ruc ureal work. If you have two people in there, then you have a lot of politics involved instead of good financial work. The emphasis should be on financial structure rather than who wins. The Fiscal Policy Committee recommended that we start out with one person and depending upon the type of bonds we issue, you wouldn't ever use a co-manager on that. If you have fixed rate transactions of $50-70 million which is really small , then you would probably need one person. If larger than that, would evaluate whether more v people should be used. The bigger the size, the more you would consider putting in. He said he thought the Fiscal Policy Committee made it clear that if someone comes in with a better way of doing this, they would be willing to listen. He urged Directors to take the Fiscal Policy Committee's and the Executive Committee's recommendations on this. Polis thought it might be better to have two sets of eyes looking at this also. Roth said he was in complete agreement with Wedaa because it is a rarity to see a Targe capital financial program that does not utilize at least two underwriters. At the County since 1985, 89% of the time they have employed at least two underwriters. Swan added that this is likely to be under $100 million and, therefore, would be Abe added to the statistics quoted. Hart asked, for those of us that aren't that familiar with this, could this go back to the Fiscal Policy Committee and come back to the Board again? Griffin replied that there has been an awful lot of time and effort put in by fhe Fiscal Policy Committee and the Executive Committee with affirmative recommendations. Said he thought if there is such a doubt as to the recommendations resulting from the work of the staff and Committees, then I would submit that this should maybe be referred back and have a presentation so that all of the Directors could have the benefit of the many issues that were considered. We are all after the best deal. It is extremely concerning to me that we started talking about it without having the full benefit of all of the issues presented. -2- The General Manager responded, the schedule that the Fiscal Policy Committee has been worker on Tnce February or March is to issue the first debt securities in the October-November timeframe. If this is delayed one month, that would make that a very difficult time schedule to meet. �..i Stanton commented that it was said before we discuss this and bring out points, this is the only time we have to talk about them. Don't presume to argue with the expertise of Peer Swan. As a layman in this area, my own staff pointed out to me that 1t is standard practice at the State of California, County of Riverside, etc. to have co-managers at no additional costs. I made that comment at the Executive Committee meeting and am making that point now. Wedaa asked Peer Swan, if Roger Stanton is correct, why don't we? Swan advised we are doing one transaction at a time. The size of State of taMornia financing is a great deal bigger. We are doing a variable rate deal for a portion. In that case, one person runs the books on it and sells. It is not typical to have co-managers on that type. Most of the County's have been fixed rate, not variable, and are large issues. This is not a large issue. In the interview process we asked at least one of the candidates, would you need a co-manager? and they said no. They are going to be tilted to one manager or the other. If we have a fixed rate deal , we could add a co-manager at that time if that is the Boards' desire. He added they are going to be spending a great deal of time with the staff to get them up to speed and come up with a plan. If you had two or three people with competing proposals, would not be easy to do. It should be a single manager, especially on the first thing. �..i Wedaa asked, will this issue be reraised later? Peer said, absolutely, if we ar —dissatisfied, could switch. The resolutions says if we select them as Senior Manager, could still select a co-manager. We need a group of people right away. If we see there is a reason to have a co-manager by then, then I will recommend that. Think we should approve recommendation and reserve the right to have a co-manager. Polis asked, what is the significance of this deadline for sale of bonds? JWS advised that the requirements for the funding is driven by the Master Plan construction program that the Boards adopted and is underway. Siefen noted that we are hiring a Financial Manager at the Districts and that wTTl-6e our second eyes. Staff replied, correct. This position is to build in-house expertise to deal with the underwriters. Silzel advised that he was in finance and have been involved in public —marceting. The key thing is that we are voting for a quarterback, and they will be developing a marketing strategy that they think will be the lowest cost to raise funds. You will have a Senior Manager to lay the plan and they will pull in other underwriters to help with the sale. They can be replaced, and frequently are replaced. Said he had every confidence in the Committees' recommendation. Have no problem with co-managers but we need to move ahead. Would rather have one key person in charge than to have disorder amongst ourselves at a time when the markets might be unsettled. M_aho�ney added that they did discuss placing our qualified person on staff who w 1� 1 be our watchdog. -3- CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. Voted by show of hands. DIRECTORS STANTON, ROTH, CULVER 8 MAIN VOTED IN OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED. M14(b)(2) - Purchase of oil and mineral rights Polls asked if the changing oil market affect these purchases? TLW replied that these are pretty small . One is willing to sell . Didn't think oil market would have any effect. The General Manager added that even with rising prices, Huntington Beach will be closing down because of the poor quality crude they produce. 815 - Re Job No. I-9 Tom Dawes briefly reported on the project and the CEQA actions taken thus far. The project includes construction of a 14-ft. diameter pipeline, industrial water line, a line for communication cables and a digester clean line. All of these items are included in proposed EIR. There were a great deal of unresolved issues at the time the Boards approved the EIR in July. The action before the Boards is to begin preparation of an EIR that will complement the 1989 EIR. -4- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 39 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14 OF -ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON AUGUST 8, 1990 ..r PltA710N ,4�`wv°tu.n oeedic9 ,yC ONgA'GE COV" _ - ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on August 8, 1990, at. 7:30 p.m., in the Districts- Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: x James A. Wahner, Chairman _Orma Crank x Charles E. Puckett, Chairman pro tan Richard B. Edgar z Dan Griset —Dan Young x Roger Stanton won R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 2: a Iry Pickier, Chat man Fred Hunter x Janes Neal, Chairman pro tell —George Scott Roland E. Bigonger a Henry W. Medea a A.B. "Buck- Catlin —Chris Norby x Dan Griset —Dan Young X William D. Mahoney —Beth Graham Hobert H. Main —Norman Culver a Carrey Nelson _Mayne Wedin x Arthur G. Newton Norman Z. Eckenrode z Wayne Silzel —Harold Saldarint a Don E. Smith —Fred Barrera x Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 3: x Richard Polls, Chairman Eva G. Miner x J.R. -Bob' Siefen, Chat man pro tem —Dewey Wiles x Edward L. Allen —_David J. Shawver x Margaret M. Arnold Cecilia L. Age —Wes Bannister x Peter Green e A.B. --Buck- Catlin _Chris Norby x Norman Culver _Robert H. Main x Beth Graham _William D. Mahoney x Don R. Griffin Donna L. Chessen x Dan Griset —Dan Young x James Neal —George Scott \J a Carrey Nelson _Mayne Wedin a Iry Pickier _Fred Hunter z Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth z Charles Sylvia Robert Wahlstrom —Edna Wilson x Frank Laszlo DISTRICT NO. 5: x Evelyn Hart, Chairman Ruthelyn Plummer a Phil Sansone, Chairman pro tem John C. Cox, Jr. x Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 6: x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman _Evelyn Hart z James Wahner, Chairman pro ten James M. Ferryman x Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 7: a Don E. Smith, Chairman Fred Barrera z Richard Edgar, Chairman pro tem —Charles E. Puckett John C. Cox, Jr. 7—Ruthelyn Plummer z Dan Griset Dan Young z Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton Sally Anne Sheridan x Barry Hammond z James Wahner _Harry Green DISTRICT NO. 11: x Grace Winchell, Chairman Peter Green z Tom Ways, Chairman pro ten —Jim Silva z Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 13: x Henry W. Medea, Chat man _Roland E. Bigonger a.� a Wayne Wedin, Chat man pro in —Fred Nelson ` a Iry Pickier Fred Hunter x Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton a Don E. Smith Fred Barrera DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chat moan Darryl Miller Sally Anne Sheridan, Chat man pro tem x Barry Hammond x Leslie A. Pontious _Richard B. Edgar z Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton a Don E. Smith Fred Barrera -2- 08/08/90 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita J. Brown, Board Secretary, Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Corinne Clawson, Ed Hodges, Penny Kyle, John Linder, Rory Nelson, Charles Nichols, Bob Ooten, Jack Vincent, Mark Esquer, Adriana Renescu OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel , Clark Ide, Jamel Demir, Walt Howard, Bill Knopf, Kris Lindstrom, Phil Stone, Mike Deblieux, Steve Coma, Mary Lee DISTRICT 13 This 8th day of August, 1990, at •,. Ad.iournment o meeting due to lack _ 7:30 p.m. , being the time and place _ 07 quorum for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, and there not being a quorum present in District No. 13, the meeting of said District was thereupon adjourned by the Secretary. DISTRICTS 7 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file minute excer t from the i y of Irvine re Board That the minute excerpt from the City appointments of Irvine re election of mayor and appointment of alternate Director and seating a new member of the Board, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows: (*Mayor) Districts Active Director Alternate Director 7 8 14 Sally Anne Sheridan* Barry Hammond DISTRICTS 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 8 14 Vice Joint Chairman Mahoney reported Report of Vite o nt ha rmon that Joint Chairman Catlin was still recouperating from a recent accident and doing well . He expects full recovery and will soon resume his full calendar of civic responsibilities. DISTRICTS 1 2 3 5 6 7 li 8 14 The General Counsel reported on the Report of the eneral ounse status of litigation filed by Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. and Universal Circuits, Inc. concerning industrial waste discharge permits. He advised that Universal Circuits, Inc. (UCI) had sold their printed circuit board facility located within District No. 1 on South Yale Street in the City of Santa Ana to United Pharmacy, Inc. An interim Industrial Waste Discharge Permit was issed to the new owner on July 31, 1990. Accordingly, UCI withdrew their appeal which had been scheduled to be heard by the Executive Committee on August 1, 1990, thereby terminating the administrative proceedings relative to the prior denial of the UCI permit for the South Yale facility by the District's staff and General Manager. _3- \ fir/ 08/08/90 Authorizing the General Counsel to Moved, seconded and duly carried: institute legal proceedings against Fleet E ui ment Car oration That the General Counsel be, and formerly Karrior Manufacturing is hereby, authorized and Company to recover payment and directed to institute legal damages for eleven four-wheel proceedings against Fleet personnel carriers Equipment Corporation (formerly Karrior Manufacturing Company) , if determined upon further investigation to be appropriate, to recover payment and damages for eleven (11) four-wheel personnel carriers delivered and paid for pursuant to Specification No. A-148 and subsequently determined to be of poor workmanship and unsafe to operate. - Cancellin urchase contract re Moved, seconded and duly carried: Purchase peci ficatian No. A-149 awarded to Karrior Manufacturing That the purchase contract Company due to breach of contract authorized by the Boards' action and non-performance by vendor of December 13, 1989, awarding Purchase Specification No. A-149 to Karrior Manufacturing Company, in the total amount of $55,411.20 plus sales tax, be, and is hereby, cancelled, based on breach of contract and non-performance by the vendor. Awarding balance of purchase Moved, seconded and duly carried: contract for Specification No. A-148 to Taylor-Dunn That the balance of purchase Manufacturing Company contract for Specification No. A-148, be, and is hereby, awarded to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company, as a substitute vendor for the original defaulting vendor for the completion of the contract t..� on the same terms and conditions, to wit: delivery of 29 personnel carriers at the same unit price, for the total amount of $107,271.00 plus sales tax. Awarding purchase contract for Moved, seconded and duly carried: Specification No. A-149 to Taylor- Dunn Manufacturing Company That the purchase contract for Specification No. A-149, be, and is hereby, awarded to Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company, as a substitute vendor for the original defaulting vendor for the performance of the entire contract on the same terms and conditions, to wit: delivery of 13 cargo carriers at the same unit price, for the total amount of $55,411.20 plus sales tax. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,11 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awa rdin 5 ecification No. P-120 to Callaway hemical Company, ulvision That the Boards of Directors hereby of Exxon Chemical Company adopt Resolution No. 90-97, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Anionic Polyelectrolyte Chemical Polymer, Specification No. P-120, to Callaway Chemical Company, Division of Exxon Chemical Company, for the price of $.865 per wet pound, plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning September 1, 1990, with provision for four one-year extensions upon mutually-agreeable terms (estimated annual cost $181,027.20 plus sales tax). Said resolution, by / reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. �.► -6- 08/08/90 DISTRICTS 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 8 14 c ons re Soda Solution, Specification No. P-1 1 Receive and file letter from Moved, seconded and duly carried: HoltraCh . thnrawin P ew bi e od heir J That the letter from HoltraChem �f o. P-121 West, Inc. dated July 16, 1990, the apparent low bidder, requesting that they be allowed to withdraw their bid for said material due to a mathematical error, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. A rovin request of HoltraChem Moved, seconded and duly carried: est. Inc. That the request of HoltraChem West, Inc. for withdrawal of their bid, be, and is hereby, approved. Award in S ecification No. P-121 to Moved, seconded and duly carried: es ern totes Chemical unply Corporation That the Boards of Directors _ hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-98, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Caustic Soda Solution, Specification No. P-121, to Western States Chemical Supply Corporation, for the price of $348.49 per dry ton, plus freight and sales tax, for a one-year period beginning September 1, 1990, with provision for a one-year extension, with estimated casts to be shared as follows: Treatment Trunk Plants Sewers Total Joint Districts $523,273.50 $436,061.25 $ 959,334.75 District 3 Only 436,061.25 436,061.25 $523,273.50 $872,122.50 $1,395,396.00 Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5 6 7 it 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving hange rder a. o the plans antl specifications for That Change Order No. 2 to the plans Job No. J-17 and specifications for Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17, authorizing a net addition of $57,876.31 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for six items of additional work or deletions, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICTS 1 2,3,5 6 7 11 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving hange Order No. to the Tans and specifications for That Change Order No. 6 to the plans Job No. -20 and specifications for Warehouse and - Maintenance Building and Oil Storage and Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20, authorizing an addition of $30,840.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for eight items of additional work, and granting a time extension of eight calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. \ -7- J 08/08/90 The only issue remaining with regard to UCI is the District's lawsuit seeking to collect fines and penalties for the numerous violations of their permit. The new owners of the facility have indicated that they will endeavor to have all matters of legal dispute resolved prior to the close of the sale of assets and the expiration of the District's interim permit, which would be on or before October 1, 1990. With regard to Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson (B/H-W) , whose facility is located within District No. 3, Mr. Woodruff reported that there were two separate lawsuits filed by B/H-W. One challenged conditions of their Industrial Waste Permit and the other challenged the the District's Industrial Waste Ordinance; both included challenges relative to the District's compliance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements. The General Counsel indicated that he was pleased to report that Judge William Rylaarsdam in the Orange County Superior Court on August 6, 1990, ruled favorably to the District in all respects and granted the District's motion for summary judgment in both lawsuits. Subject to appeal , the cases are ` closed. The Vice Joint Chairman then expressed the Boards' appreciation to the General Counsel for his successful defense of the District in the above matter. Mr. Woodruff credited Rutan & Tucker, and especially Mr. Dave Larson, who joined with Rourke & Woodruff on this case, with being responsible for a large part of the effort and success. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 11, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or ../ Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 11, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or pproyal of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 11, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 11, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 11, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 11, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -4- 08/08/90 DISTRICT it There being no corrections or Approval of inu es amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 11, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or -/ Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 11, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICTS 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Rat fica ion of a en o oin and individual Distr c Claims- That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so Indicated. 7/04/90 7/18190 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 894,769.45 $ 729,738.03 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 6,710,901.54 368,265.20 Joint Working Capital Fund - 206,970.22 191,899.56 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 104,900.52 17,122.96 DISTRICT NO. 1 - -0- 1,076,251.41 OI TRRT NT7_2 - 177,357.30 1,941,447.35 DISTRI��3 - 323,737.66 2,106,158.02 DIDI TRIG - 29,155.30 .8,746.68 DTgTWFCT - -0- 525.75 DI TRH T� - 190,799.64 53,411.59 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 78.84 1,573.51 D TRICT NO. 14 - 206,332.91 3,872.46 DI TR—I TL FW6 5 8 6 JOINT - 3,580.49 5,537.99 DISTRICTSS. 6 & 7 J INT - 2,353.14 -0- RI CT 14 J IN- - 3 348.35 -0- 5,504,55 .51 DISTRICTS 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 8 14 Actions re Purchase of Forty (467 Four-Wheei Electric Personnel Carriers Specification No. A-14 , and Purchase of Thirteen 13 Fmur- Wheel Electric Cargo arriers, Specification NO. A-149 Cancellin urchase of remainin Moved, seconded and duly carried: a ance of four-wheel electric ersonnel carriers awarded to That purchase of the remaining Karrior Manufac wring o"any re balance of 29 four-wheel electric Specification No. A-148 due t0 personnel carriers provided for breach of contract and non- in the purchase contract performance by vendor authorized by the Boards' action of December 13, 1989, which which awarded purchase Specification No. A-148 to Karrior Manufacturing Company, be, and is hereby, cancelled, in the net remaining amount of $107,271.00 plus sales tax, based on breach of contract and non-performance by the vendor. -5- 08/08/90 DISTRICTS 1,2 3,5 6 7 11 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin han a rder o. to the tans and specifications or That Change Order No. 2 to the plans Job 0. 1- 4-1 and specifications for Gas Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-1, authorizing a net addition of $35,609.00 to the contract with Ziebarth 8 Alper for six items of additional work or deletions, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICTS 1 2 3,5 6 7,11 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accept ng ab No. P1-35-1 as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-99, accepting Rehabilitation of Digesters 7 and 8 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-1, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,11 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: ADO roving Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement That the Boards of Directors hereby With Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. for adopt Resolution No. 90-100, Win and construction services approving Addendum No. 4 to the re Jab Nos. P1-25, PI-eb, PZ-JZ, Professional Services Agreement with P2-33 and P - 4 Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. for design and construction services required for Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-25; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-26; Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33; and Improvements to Grit Facility "B", Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure "A", Job No. P2-34, providing for a reallocation of the costs among categories within said agreement, with no change in the maximum authorized compensation of $892,708.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,11 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement That the Selection Committee with Lee and No Consulting certification of the final negotiated Engineers for design and fee relative to Addendum No. 3 to the construction services re Professional Services Agreement with Job No. Pl-33 Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers for design and construction services required for Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33, providing for additional construction support services, preparation of an amendment to the Operations and Maintenance Manual , and start-up and training services, and reducing subconsultant fees previously authorized, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adapt Resolution No. 90-101, approving Addendum No. 3 to said Agreement with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers for said additional services and reduction in subconsultant fees, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, for an additional amount not to exceed $123,400.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $1,064,500.00 to an amount not to exceed $1,187,900.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -8- 08/08/90 DISTRICTS 1,2 3,5 6 7 it & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the election omm t ee to negotiate a eem Professional That the Selection Committee be, and Services Agrent for engineering is hereby, authorized to solicit and environmental services for proposals and negotiate a preparation of a Project Report, Professional Services Agreement for Supplement No. 2 to the Program engineering and environmental Environmental Impact Report on the services for preparation of a Project Collection, Treatment and Disposal Report, Supplement No. 2 to the Facilities Master Plan and far Program Environmental Impact Report desi n and construction su ort on the Collection, Treatment and services re Job No. P1- 7 Disposal Facilities Master Plan, and for design and construction support services relative to Primary Clarifiers 16-27 and Related Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-37. DISTRICTS 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing a eneral Manager to - employ a Financial Manager at the That the General Manager be, and is tap step of the salary range to hereby, authorized to employ a wor in the Finance Division Financial Manager at the top step of the salary range (currently $5,669.00 per month) for this position classification to work in the Districts' Finance Division. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,1I 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the General Manager to employ a Laboratory Manager at the That the General Manager be, and is to ste of the solar ran a to hereby, authorized to employ a werk in the Technical ervices Laboratory Manager at the top step of - Laboratory Division the salary range (currently $5,592.00 per month) for this position classification to work in the Districts' Technical Services/Laboratory Division. DISTRICTS 1,2 1,,1,6,7,11 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Establishing 1 - 1 charges for Class I, Class II and Class III That the respective Boards of Industrial Waste permittees Directors hereby adopt the following resolutions establishing 1990-91 charges for Class I. Class II and Class III permittees, pursuant to provisions of the uniform Ordinance Establishing Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities of said Districts: 1990-91 INDUSTRIAL USER RATES Class I & II Fee Class III Fee Dist. No. Resolution No. Flow(*) S.S. * B.O.D. * Flow *) 1 90-102-1 $186.80 $154.58 $120.98 $ 761.33 2 90-103-2 182.59 154.58 120.98 757.12 3 90-104-3 214.53 154.58 120.98 789.06 - 5 90-105-5 230.18 154.58 120.98 804.71 6 90-106-6 191.81 154.58 120.98 766.34 7 90-107-7 247.23 154.58 120.98 821.77 11 90-108-11 252.94 154.58 120.98 827.47 14 90-110-14. 344.75 154.58 120.98 919.28 *Flow - Per million gallons of flow \ *S.S. - Per thousand pounds of suspended solids �d *B.O.D. - Per thousand pounds of biochemical oxygen demand -9- 08/08/90 Director Silzel explained that the principal reason for appointing a single Senior Manager at this point was to have one key person in charge to develop a marketing strategy that will ensure that the Districts are utilizing the lowest cost method of raising funds, rather than have competing proposals and possible conflicts between two co-managers. He observed that this was particularly important because of a potentially unsettled market due to the Middle-East situation. He added that if the Board desires to replace or add another Manager in the future, it would still be possible to do that. He concurred with the Committees' recommendation and pointed out that the Senior Manager would lay the plan and could pull in other underwriters to help with the sale. Mr. Silzel said he not object to co-managers but felt it was important to move forward at this time. Following further discussion and a call for the question, the Boards of Directors adopted Resolution No. 90-111, designating and appointing Merrill Lynch Capital Markets as the Senior Manager/Underwriter for the Districts' proposed long-term securities debt issue program. Directors Norman E. Culver, Robert H. Main, Don R. Roth and Roger R. Stanton requested that their votes in opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Approving Professional Services Moved, seconded and duly carried: Agreement with the law firms of Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander & That the Boards of Directors Ferdon and Rourke & Woodruff to hereby adopt Resolution serve as co-Bond Counsel for No. 90-112, approving a proposed long-term securities debt Professional Services Agreement issue program with the law firms of Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander & Ferdon and �./ Rourke & Woodruff to serve as co-Bond Counsel for the Districts' proposed long-term securities debt issue program. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,11 & 14 Actions relative to the purchase of surface easements and sub-surface oil and mineral rights at Treatment Plant No. 2 Authorizing the General Manager and Moved, seconded and duly carried: General Counsel to offer to purchase oil facilities, leases and That the General Manager and mineral rights at appraisal prices General Counsel be, and are hereby, authorized to offer to purchase oil facilities, leases and mineral rights at the appraisal prices from the following: (1) D. W. Elliott (2) County of Orange (3) Pacific Energy Resources (Karalas Lease) (4) . Lessor Group ., (5) Overriding Royalty Owners -12- \%O✓ 08/08/90 Authorizing the General Counsel to Moved, seconded and duly carried: institute eminent domain proceedings against operators or That the General Counsel be, and leaseholders is hereby, authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings against operators or leaseholders, if necessary. Authorizing staff to solicit Moved, seconded and duly carried: proposals for preparation of plans and specifications for abandonment That staff be, and is hereby, and removal of oil facilities at authorized to solicit proposals Treatment Plant No. 2 for the preparation of plans and specifications for abandonment and removal of the oil facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,11 & 14 Actions relative to prequallf ication of suppliers and/or prepurchase of certain major items of equipment Approving prequalification of Moved, seconded and duly carried: suppliers of influent um s and variable frequency drives reau red That prequalification of the in connection with Job No. P2-42-1 following suppliers of influent pumps and variable frequency drives required in connection with Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-1, be, and is hereby, approved: Influent Pumps: (1) Fairbanks-Morse (2) Allis Chalmers (3) Patterson (4) Gould Variable Frequency Drives: (1) Westinghouse (2) Brown Boveri (3) Ross Hill (4) Toshiba (5) Allen-Bradley (6) General Electric (7) Louis Allis Authorizing staff to negotiate with Moved, seconded and duly carried: Parks on Corporation for sole source purchase of Wyss aeration diffusers That staff be, and is hereby, for use in Job No. P1-36 authorized to negotiate with Parkson Corporation for the sole source purchase of Wyss aeration diffusers for use in Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36. Authorizing staff to negotiate with Moved, seconded and duly carried: The Budd Company for sole source purchase of sludge collectors for That staff be, and is hereby, use in Job No. P242-2 authorized to negotiate with The Budd Company for the sole source purchase of sludge collectors for use in Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Jab No. P2-42-2. -13- 08/08/90 ' DISTRICTS 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive f e and a rove written report of the onserva ion That the written report of the Reclamation and Reuse omni ee Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee meeting held on July 26, 1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. DISTRICTS 1,2 3 5 6 7 11 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive a an a rove wr tten report of the uuiioing Committee That the written report of the Building Committee meeting held on July 31, 1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. DISTRICTS 1 2 3 5 6 7 S1 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving change r er o. 18 to the pians ana specifications re That Change Order No. 18 to the Job No. - plans and specifications for _ Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4, authorizing an addition of $240,000.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corp. to provide interim funding for Phases 2, 3 and 4 additional framing and concrete, heating and air conditioning, electrical , fire protection, plumbing, painting, plaster and stucco, insulation, and sheet metal and roof work, as recommended by the Building Committee, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICTS 1 2 3 5 6,7 11 8 14 The Vice Joint Chairman noted that the Receive, file an approve written Boards' approval of the Executive report of the Executive Committee Committee's written report of the meeting on July 25, 1990, would constitute approval of the salary adjustments considered and recommended by the Committee at said meeting. He further advised that a formal resolution for the recommended adjustments would be considered by the Boards at their next regular meeting on September 12th. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the written report of the Executive Committee meeting held on July 25, 1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. DISTRICTS 1ct 2 3 5 6 7 11 8 14 Actions re se ect ono underwr er and bond counsel for Districts' long-range financing and borrowing program A ointin Merrill L nh Ca ital c It was moved and seconded: Markets as a en or manager/ Underwriter for the Districts, That the Boards of Directors long-term securities a ssue adopt Resolution No. 90-111, program designating and appointing Merrill Lynch Capital Markets as the Senior Manager/Underwriter writer for the Districts' proposed long-term securities debt issue program, as recommended by the Fiscal Policy and Executive Committees. -10- 08/08/90 Supervisor Stanton stated that he opposed this motion for the reasons he stated at the Executive Committee meeting. He noted that his staff had advised him that the usual practice of the County of Orange, other counties and the State is to use co-managers for their debt issues, and he believed the Districts should retain co-managers in connection with their program. Supervisor Roth concurred and quoted statistics indicating that the majority of governmental issues in recent years have utilized co-managers. The General Counsel pointed out that the Districts did not request proposals for co-manager underwriting services, but didn't believe there would be any additional costs nor savings by using co-managers. Directors discussed the dollar amounts of the debt proposed to be issued over the next 15 years. It was noted that the entire amount may total over $600 million in numerous issues over the next several years, but the first issue would be considerably less, perhaps around $100 million. Director Swan commented that $100 million was not considered a large issue requiring a co-manager. If the issue is larger than that, the Districts could then evaluate whether additional managers should be retained. It was pointed out that increasing the size of an issue increases the likelihood of utilizing co-managers. Certain types of issues, such as variable rate, do not lend themselves to co-managers. The Districts' preliminary plan includes a mix of fixed and variable rate issues. It was also pointed out that A was important on the first issue to have a single manager to develop a financial structure and marketing strategy and not have to deal with competing or contradictory interests that sometimes occur with cc-managers. The Boards can change managers or utilize co-managers at any time and the proposed resolution so provides. Directors pointed out that the Fiscal Policy Committee and the Executive Committee have spent a considerable amount of time studying this matter since February. The Committees' recommendation is that the program start with one Senior Manager to develop a financial structure and marketing strategy, which will require a very close working relationship with the Districts' staff. In reponse to Directors' comments relative to the possible benefit of additional oversight by a co-manager, it was pointed out that the new Districts' staff position of Financial Manager was intended to provide In-house expertise and oversee the activities of the underwriter. Directors also discussed continuing the matter until the next Board meeting in order for the full Board to review all of the issues considered by the Fiscal Policy Committee and the Executive Committee. However, staff pointed out that the Committees' recommended schedule provided for the first debt securities to be issued in the October/November time frame in order to meet the funding requirements for the construction program included in the 1989 Master Plan approved by the Boards last July. The General Manager noted that if the selection of a Senior Manager is delayed, it would be very difficult to meet that time schedule. -11- \ 08/08/90 Approving prequalification of Moved, seconded and duly carried: susotiers ofeq com ate rs and asciated uipment that wiii That prequalification of the interface with Districts' existin following suppliers of computers `..✓ a ui men re aired in connection and associated equipment that ME Jab Nos. J- 3-2 and P -44 will interface with the Districts' existing equipment required in connection with Plant 1 Control Center Instrumentation, Job No. J-23-2, and Replacement of Computerized Monitoring System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-44, be, and is hereby, approved: (1) Bailey Controls (2) Allen-Bradley (3) Fischer & Porter (4) Johnson Yokogawa Corp. (5) Westinghouse DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,11 & 14 Actions re preparation of Supplement No. 1 to the Program Environmental Im act Re ort for the 1989 Collection, Trea men an Disposal Facilities Master Plan required to assess impacts result in from construction of Jo o. - `✓ Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering reported that in 1989 the Boards approved an updated Master Plan which provided for facilities necessary to meet flow and regulatory discharge requirements for the next 30 years. Also approved was an Environmental Impact Report which addressed most of the master-planned projects. However, a few projectes included within the document were only able to be addressed in a general manner and were designated as needing further review and additional CEQA documentation when the project was ready to begin the design phase. He noted that Job No. I-9, Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, was one of those projects. In February the Directors approved an agreement with John Carollo Engineers to provide environmental services, preliminary and final design and construction support services for Job No. I-9. Mr. Dawes reported that the project includes a new 120-inch diameter sewer line to transport treated wastewater within a 30-foot corridor along the westerly levee of the Santa Ana River from the Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant to the Ocean Outfall Booster Station at Treatment Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach. The new line will be approximately 18,700 feet long and will replace an old 42-inch line which is over 60 years old and in poor condition. Relocation and/or replacement of the existing interplant digester gas line and communications cables will also be required during construction of the new 120-inch line. The estimated cost of this project is $32 million. 14- 08/08/90 Mr. Dawes noted that within the existing corridor are power poles which belong to Southern California Edison Company which will have to be relocated pursuant to the Districts' easement agreement of 1977. At Plant No. 2 there are several oil leases which have operating wells which interfere with the construction of the pipelines and they must be purchased, removed and abandoned. Also, the Corps of Engineers, in conjunction with the County of Orange, has scheduled Santa Ana River channel improvements which could conflict with the construction of this project. These possible impacts and scheduling contraints must be addressed in the proposed EIR supplement. Mr. Dawes further reported that staff has initiated the required additional CEQA documentation for this project by circulating the Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment which finds that an Environmental Impact Report is required. He noted that the action on the agenda authorizes preparation of a Draft Supplement No. 1 to the Program EIR for the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, and circulation of said document for public review in compliance with CEQA. Receive and file Initial Study and Moved, seconded and duly carried: Environmental Impact Assessment re Job No. I-9 That the Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment relative to construction of the Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9, finding that said project could have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, an Environmental Impact Report will be required, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed, Authori zin re aration of Draft Moved, seconded and duly carried: MSu lement No. o the Pro ram EIR e the 1989 Collection, Treatment That the Boards of Directors and Disposal Facilities Master Plan hereby authorize preparation of Draft Supplement No. 1 to the Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan and circulation for public review in compliance with CEQA requirements. DISTRICTS 1 2 3,5 6 7 11 8 14 Actions re Supplemental Benda items relative to Summons and Comp a ntI filed on behalf of District employees received subsequent to the agenda being posted Report of General Counsel The General Counsel reported on five Summons and Complaints received subsequent to the agenda mailing which had been placed on a supplemental agenda included in the Directors' meeting folders. He _ advised that in his view these claims from District employees alleging injuries as a result of exposure to chemicals in the performance of their work are ill placed and not well founded. Each of these complaints are also subject to several procedural challenges due to errors and untimeliness. Mr. Woodruff stated that these claims rest solely as Workers' Compensation claims if any injury is to be established at all . He further noted that the Plantiffs' counsel had, in fact, filed Workers' Compensation claims, and they are currently pending and set for hearing in the immediate future. -15- 08/08/90 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Select on amnittee to negotiate Addendum No. t� That the Selection Committee be, and Professional Services Agreement is hereby, authorized to negotiate With Willdan Associates for design Addendum No. 2 to the Professional and construction services re aired Services Agreement with Willdan re Contract Nos. 2-26-3 and 2- Associates for design and construction services required for Portion of Euclid Interceptor, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-3, and Katella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-28, to provide for additional design services necessary to incorporate changes recommended by CALTRANS and the Cities of Anaheim and Fullerton, and for other miscellaneous services required re Contract No. 2-26-3. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: uthorizi ng initiation of proceedings re proposed Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby No. 72 - Trider Annexation adopts Resolution No. 90-113-2, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex 6.687 acres of territory to the District located in the vicinity of Sycamore Street and Santiago Boulevard in the City of Villa Park (proposed Annexation No. 72 - Trider Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:20 p.m. , August 8, 1990. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:20 p.m., August 8, 1990. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 2 to the plans Contract No. 5-34-2 and specifications for Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 2, Contract No. 5-34-2, authorizing an addition of $28,803.00 to the contract with Kenko, Inc. , dba McGrand 8 Associates, for two items of additional work, and granting a time extension of six calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:20 p.m. , August 8, 1990. -18- 08/08/90 DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: pp roving Agreemen a weep pun Y Sani atian District o. os a That the Board of Directors hereby Mesa Sanitary District and the JZno adopts Resolution No. 90-114-6, Agricultural District far transfer approving Agreement between County of sewers within urange ounty Sanitation District No. 6, Costa Mesa Fairgrounds Sanitary District and the 32nd Agricultural District, providing for the transfer of ownership and/or abandonment of sewers and easements within and adjacent to the Orange County Fairgrounds from District No. 6 to the Costa Mesa Sanitary District and the 32nd Agricultural District. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:20 p.m. , August 8, 1990. DISTRICTS 7 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving hange r er o. to_ he lans and s ec�cions re That Change Order No. 2 to the plans contract No. 14-1-15 and specifications for Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road (and City of Costa Mesa street improvements) , Contract ° No. 14-1-1B, authorizing an addition of $94,697.00 to the contract with Steve Bubalo Construction Co. for ten items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICTS 7 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and deny claim of Kathleen P. Landers re Contract That the claim of Kathleen P. Landers No. 14-1-15 dated June 24, 1990, in the amount of $650.50 for alleged damages to her vehicle incurred in connection with construction of Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road (and City of Costa Mesa street improvements) , Contract No. 14-1-18, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the Districts' General Counsel , liability claims administrator, contractor and contractor's insurance company for appropriate action. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Arovin Chan a rder No. 2 to the Ml ans and s ecifications re That Change Order No. 2 to the plans Contract Nos. 7-I1-1 and 7- 1- and specifications for Abandonment of Lane Road Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-1, and Abandonment of Castlerock and Dow Avenue Pump Stations and Modifications to MacArthur Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-3, authorizing an addition of $24,319.00 to the contract with Colich & Sons (JV) for four items of additional work, and granting a time extension of seven calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:20 p.m. , August 8, 1990. -19- 08/08/9U Receive and file General Counsel 's Moved, seconded and duly carried: emorandum That the General Counsel 's Memorandum dated August 6, 1990, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file Summons and Moved, seconded and duly carried: OMDlaint for Damages for egligence-Premises L ab t That the Summons and Complaint Ne li enc— e-P�rotluc s CTabt i� for Damages for Breach of warranty; Wicr Negligence-Premises Liability; Liability; Fraudulent Concealment Negligence-Products Liability; anuel Riveramelo vs. county Breach of Warranty; Strict Sanitation Districts or Orange Liability; Fraudulent County, orange (;Ountg superiorConcealment, Manuel Riveramelo Court Case No. 5> vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 564614, relative to alleged injuries to a District employee as a result of exposure to chemicals in the performance of his work, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. Receive and file Summons and Moved, seconded and duly carried: Comolaint for Damages for Ne ence- remises Liabilit • That the Summons and Complaint Negligence-Products Liab t • for Damages for Breach of Warrant • S rict Negligence-Premises Liability; L ab lit Fraudulent oncea men Negligence-Products Liability; Robert 5auceclo vs. L;ount4 Breach of Warranty; Strict �..� Sanitation Districts ot uran a Liability; Fraudulent oun��n a ount Su er ar Concealment, Robert Saucedo vs. ourt ase No. 4 1 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 564616, relative to alleged injuries to a District employee as a result of exposure to chemicals in the performance of his work, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. Receive and file Summons and Moved, seconded and duly-carried: Complaintfor Damages for Ne ence-Premises Liabiit That the Summons and Complaint NeQ Qence_prod�cts L iabi itV! for Damages for Breach of Warrant • Strict Negligence-Premises Liability; Liabilit Fraudulent Concealment Negligence-Products Liability; J effre Lyn nty Breath of Warranty; Strict an; ation Districts o ran a Liability; Fraudulent County, Orange Countyu error Concealment, Jeffrey Lynn Jones Court Case NO. 5 4 17 vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 564617, relative to alleged injuries to a District employee as a result of exposure to chemicals in the performance of his work, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. -16- 08/08/90 Receive and file Summons and Moved, seconded and duly carried: Complaint for Damages for Ne li ence-Premises L a it That the Summons and Complaint Ne li ence- roducts L1a slit • for Damages for Breach of Warrant trict Negligence-Premises Liability; iabilit • Fraudulent oncea ment Negligence-Products Liability; Frank Walton, Jr. , A Minor, by his Breach of Warranty; Strict Guardian ad Li tem Michelle Walton; Liability; Fraudulent Jennifer a on, A Minor by her Concealment, Frank Walton, Jr. , A Guardian ad Litem Lo rie Miller vs. Minor, by his Guardian ad Litem, oun an a on Dis r cts of Michelle Walton; Jennifer Walton, Orange uounry, ran a Lounry A Minor, by her Guardian ad Superior court case No. b19476 Litem, Loris Miller vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 619476, relative to alleged injuries to a District employee as a result of exposure to chemicals in the performance of his work, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. - Receive and file Summons and Moved, seconded and duly carried: Com laint for Damages for Negligence-Premises Liability; That the Summons and Complaint Negligence-Products Liability; for Damages for Breach of arrant • trict Negligence-Premises Liability; Liabi lit ; fraudulent ancealment, Negligence-Products Liability; Lyn Redman vs. ount an tation Breach of Warranty; Strict Districts Of Orange uounty, urange Liability; Fraudulent -- Co nty �uper or Court Case Concealment, Lynn Redman vs. No. 6ZZ19Z County Sanitation Districts of �.✓ Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 622192, relative to alleged injuries to a District employee as a result of exposure to chemicals in the performance of his work, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:20 p.m. , August 8, 1990. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizin the election Omnittee ia to ne otte a Pro ess ono That the Selection Committee be, and Ter—vices Agreement for preparation is hereby, authorized to solicit of a Project Report relative to proposals and negotiate a Contract No. 2- T Professional Services Agreement for preparation of a Project Report for Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-941. -17- 08/08/90 DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:20 p.m., August 8, 1990. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:20 p.m. , August 8, 1990. Secretary of t e Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 -20- F U( 41"4 JT JIST NOT-Illu CPF ITAL F60PF.SPINn wit 6/27/n• FA6F '1 RE-047 PUPPER AF41 COUNTY S44ITAIIOH U14TRICIS OF OPAMBI COUNTY _ ! CLAIMS FAIL !'7111411,4 POSTING DATI I/C9/91 - - - -----_._ _...- la WARRANT NO. VCNDOP __... APOUNT DESCRIPTION '1r 107615 AUVA/WPCF RF'SIPUALS MGMT. 1245.sL REGISTRATION • 107RIb _ ACTION DOOR REFAIP CORP. _ _ f3.¢7F.Vn„ ,DOOR REPAIR,.,,,.. . ,__PIING- __.- --'----." '._ ._ _. . . .. ... .. . _. . _ ... ._..- 107817 AIR COL CONSTRUCTORS• INC. 1462r 291.45 ELECTRIC P1-344 ^�. I07818 AIR COLD SUPPLY INC. 7322.89 81.ECTRIC PARTS 107819 AIRGUAA2 LBP!!3IR1_Eff jL9CTR.IC WEFLT90 107820 ALL INDUSTRIAL VALVES -- - - $2.629.41 VALVE hi• 107821 ALPHAGA7 129219.V4 PROPANE 107822 ALLIED SUPPLY CO. 6P.16,9.}S_„_ .__._..._ ----_ .._. . _.. VALVE 307829 CITY OF ANAHE IM f117.914.42 CONSTRUCTION REINBURSENT 2-26. M.0:12+10-86 107824 ANAHEIM' $EVER CONSTRUCTION $5,136.64 SEWER REPAIRS DIST 7 • ' 107825E ANTXTER T Y1�6_G2B.kE...-...-__._-.____.. ... 12 L119e2k..._.___.__. GAE6E._._..__.. _.____._. .. IEEE_ ._. ........,........... ..,_...___ 10782 ANTELOPE VALLEY EQUIP. 7121.7E MOTOR PART 107827 APPLES SYSTEMS !4.115.50 NO'TIC63 6 ADS 10782E APPLE ONE ,813.60____,____INSTRUMENT 107829 ASSOONACIA INSTRUMENT' $1,893.40 SOILTESTI 107831 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING fSrS9i.B0 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89 107832 R NOOLOH RUSTIC CO. Be MECHANICAL 107532 B 8 T INDUSTRIAL CS 489.91 MECHANICAL PARTS :5 107P33 RC INDUETRI AL SUPPLY, INC. $9fl9.91 MECHANICAL PARTS r.X 107935 BANCROFT 1 GALLERYPUBLICA 107835 BANCROF7-NNITNEY CO*• 81tl8.30 PUBLICATION -��W . 107836E B y B4RO7T1 AND A6$UQ 12.937.50 CONSTRUCTION SERVICE VI.34-2.P2-37 107 3 BARTER SCIENilF 1C SSICIS _1600.fi L. _________MS SUPPLIES 10783E BAYLESS STATIONERS $557.83 OPPIICR SUPPLIER 1018329 RENL ENGINEERING, INC. 76.86 NECBAIIIf:AI. PARTS 101040 BONNEVILLE EQUIP., INC. }`.LLIkS._zR NINE. CRANE_CBRTIPICRTION,.__.__......... .... 1D7B91 , . . BRINDERSON CORP. - $1..121970.70 CONSTRUCTION J-19-2 �a lOtS12 , BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. 1302.H1 METER REPAIR • _ 107843 BROWN -1 CALOVEL2 39¢.00______- LAB SERVICES __._-.._.._ ..____.ENGINE-__EPEE__ IC7845 BROWN TEVE 6 CALD4ELL CONSULTING 176.419.0. ENGINEERING SERVICES14- - PI-35.P2-39.3-19 '�v 1C7845 SIEVE BIIEPLO CONSTRUCTION CO. f267.919.4l1 CONSTRUCTION 16-1-11 107846 P.R. BURKE INDUSIPIAL CORP. _ ____-. lL•29k,.3C____._...__.____........_.C�NSTADCTION J-24__.__ _____.__._.___ 1078 ESN 6ND ASEOCI ATFS. INC. �•. 11 7. ENGINEERSERVICES ING 107P98 GAPT 6. STREED $397.05 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 88-71 107849 _BY-PRODUCTS NONAGEMEN7- 10 .___,,.._ .fFB-•903.l3,_ ,. ,,, ,,_............. IEEE �RROUS cBLORIDE_N.0.4_12LRE... _. ._._�.__ _._. 107850 CS COMPANY---- - -- _ _ -- $2,396•12 VALVE PARTS 107852 CAL-GLASS FOR PESEARCH. INC. $476.42 LAD SUPPLIES 107952 _ CAL-PAC CHE'M1CAL-__C0.3 1NC. CHEMICALS_ _ .. SIb6.9f ., CLS___ _ _ ...____ 107853 CRL SOU7N EOUIFMLNT CO. 5517.5E INSTRUNBNT REPAIR )•• 107854 CALTROL • INC. f125.0P INSTRUMENT REPAIR 10786E __ CAL TYPE. OFFICE MACNINESL INC. $196.94 OFFICE MACHINE IO7P56 CILTi ORNIR -AUTO CnLLIS1UN. INC t731.42 - TRUER REPAIRS - - - • - -- J•. 107857 JOHN CAROLED LNGIPLLRS 1329.629.35 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-34.P1-36.P2-42.P1-20 a 1OISSR CASC POWER d EGUIPMFN7 _ _ 1261.R2 HARDWARE 107859 CENT EL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM11.949.Iy - TELEPHONE RY6T EM NODIPICA E _ - - j 107960 CHRIS CERVFL1011E 13R2.110 MEETING EXPENSE J r l FUND NO gI19 - J1 DIST WnitNINC CAPITAL FPOCESSING DATE fi/21/9, F'AOL P NEPOPT 1:UM9C.A AP41 COUNTY S611FIA710N 0IRT41CTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ... ._. _ ...CLAIMS FAIO 71,4/90 POSTING DATE 1'7/OI%g0 .. _ ._._.. ' WARRANT 140. _ VENDOR AMOJN7 DESCRIPTION ^1 . 107861 CHCVPON U,S,A,. INC. E2.456.39 UNGRADED GASOLINE • 107862 CHUCF•S ELECTRIC 01, 152.6q ELECTRIC PART„ SAFETY SUPPLIES . 107864 COAST FIRE EGUIFMERT E2,J54.65 SAFETY SUPPLIES . 1U7865 COLICH AND SONS f142,703.35 CONSTRV9TIDR7-1171 .e 0 866 —C`b P ES�bS N COXC OFFFI T3•UF--bR1.�f -- Ii;a 5.-4 _ - ' _ MECBANICAL PARTS- 'ln 107867 CONPUSENVE f1q.00 COMPUTER SERVICES n 10786A CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. $5.487.38 ELECTRIC PARTS ,817.fi BLUEPRINTING N,0.1-16-90 'lu 107871 COOPER INDUSTRIES. INC. i620.877.10 ENGINES ACE N,0.5-13-87.6-8-BB,J-19A 107872 COSTAR OBION PRODUCTS 111.409.00$669 STORAGE TANKS COSTA MESA ���_.._.__...--_.._---ifi.69 —_—_ _.TRUER PARTS __ 1g7873 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC E1r299.3P ELECTRIC SUPPLIES w., 07R74 CHEMPRO ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $946.11 107875 CAL WATER . .--iTS8:T5-- --itENt ii squirm"._.__..-- 1 #07876 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE S2D5A3 TIRES 1078T7 TOM' DAWES' $62.30 MEETING MUSE 0 8 DESKTOP GRAPHICS A OES 6N n,XF7y 1078 DEPU RIN AND/OR CS CO. f3.714..75 VALVE DIPARTS I078 80 DIFILIPDO ASSOCIATES E011.75 SE�A A DISPOSAL -0N RL RTICNC• DO I NT__ING TeBTINO SERVICES •"� tp 107882 OIVERSIFIEII 1MSP F;C7I0N ' $934.50 TRUCK PARTS R 307883 OUNN EL ER O$. MpC NO ING, ___ $1 14,1.67_ SPACE RENTAL J-19A 3 107889 NA SERVICES' INC. $25,434.5E ENGINEERING SERVICES J-23-2 n 107885 ENSECO-CRL $1,003.00 OCEAN SAMPLING 107886 EA STMANr INC. f1.935.24 OFFICE SUPPLIES i 07R W.. R qT CORP. ' —' -- 566.773.00_— ---CONeTRUCTION 2-26-2,1-2T--- --*"----- '� 1 107988 EL 70RO COMPUTER SOLUTIONS A2S.V0 OFFICE MACHINE REPAIR 01812 ELECTSO NUMERICS INC. __ __-, tl.2gB.90 _--_._,_____-._.,INSTRUMENT EUPPLIEB_,_._.___,_—_•—_,_,_,_,—_ 307 90 WARD L. ELLIOT* JR. $961.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES 107891 ENCHANTER' INC. iq♦800.OD OCEAN MONITORING H.0.3-14-90 107892 ENGINEEPING-SCI F.NCE ____ E970.40 ENGINEERING SERVICES 107893 N IN R S�TRUMENTATION — $964.28 PUMP PARTS w 107895 FSTSANNIEARA INSTRUMENTATION ON $588.51 TEST BOGIAVEL 107896 JOH SAND AND GRAVEL' INC. __ 3555.51 BAND.3 GRAVEL 0 896 0• A Mt%EPVIC P.F. S3,B25.19 CONSTRUCTION 98&VICBE J-7-A�]-20,J-17 107698 FARR SALES A SCPVICE f $115.00 FILTER 107898 FEDERAL ERFgE SS GDPF• i114•U0 AIR FREIGHT s 89 ER T�1i10�A7Nr1 E.N—__.__.___.—_ ... ..-_.__....... A319.7T-._.__--._.--..._.. ... PUBLICATI0l1_... ._._.__..._._._._ . . ....._._......_.__. 107900 FERRELLOAS $34.43. PROPANE s 107901 FISCHER A PORTER CO. f3.e11.69 CHLORINATION PARTS ._........._.. 'CUECBETB CC'['1'IBC._.. J, 107903 FLUID COMPONENTS. INC. f15.191.07 METER 107904 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $13.76 FILM _ _....__-_..._ _. ....._...... . hiRf 07 __.. ._. _...._.._.............. U CLTT P NT _ i9,J!IU.7TfPAINT SUPPLIES w 107906 THE FOMOGRO CO. f2.012.73 INSTRUMENT PART .) 3 w FUNo-. .. 9114 J1 01ST VOOMIP!G CAPITAL PROCCRSI NO DAIE 6/27/9•' PAGE REPORT NUMHLR AP43 COUNTY SA_NITAT_7ON OI1 YRICT3_OF ORANGE_ COUNTY ------- --Uil NB-PAIU" I%ii4%90 POSTING DATE P7/O BI9!1 1 . WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION "1 . 107907 FOXOORO/JONDAN $340.53 INSTRUMENT REPAIR 107908 FPEOSON A. • SUPPLY f 1.94 TRUCK PARTS _ • 107909 GENERAL CHEMICAL 57.50R.011 CHEMICALS 107910 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. f1.849.38 TELEPHONE SERVICES 107911 GEORGE LEECH AASSOCIATE3 10 912 67ERLICH.MITCHELL. INC. - - --" " - - SSB.934.69 OECHANICAL PASTS �1u 107913 OON GREEK A ASSOCIATES $4.591.42 SURVEYING SERVICES RES 88-72 •. 107914 MARILOE0. I E 13W.0.� METING EXPENSE AL 9 $401.11 CHIMICA1.8 107916 HARBOUR ENGINEERING f89157.00 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 101917 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS f881.07 INSTRUMENT PART 107918 JA ES R. HARRIS $629.64 MEETING EIPENSE h 107919 HATCH R KIRK, INC. S2.192.15 MECHANICAL PARTS 107420 S. A. ME LY CO. $301342__77_ _ CONSTRUCTION P1-35-1____"_,_ 9 H LLO f2U0.U6 T6L6lPIIONE PART 107922 LINUA HIMENES f20.40 MILEAGE EXPENSES 107973 HOFFMAN AIR & FILTRATION 3138.82 _MECHANICAL PARTS 924 HOPIION HIGH-REACH $233.36 TRUCK PARTS 7 . X 107925 HOUSE OF BATTERIES 92,344.36 RAT'IERIES 107926 A.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. $913.22 SAFETY SUPPLIES 107927 CITY OF NUN NGTON BEACH 16.54 WATER USEACE 111928 HUNj INGTON OE ACH RUBBER STAMP ".. SRAI.00 RUBBER STAMPS 5 107929 HUNT!N6T ON SUPPLY f66.41 _HARDWARE _ "_, _ a U H N71NGT YA LEY SCHWINN CYCL 3126.18 BICYCLE PARTS 1 1017937 MYDROTE%. INC. 58.155.54 ENGINE OIL 107932 ICC INSTRUMENT $75.95 WITTER REPAIR 1�7133ISCO, INC. 94.0 7.35 IMBTRUMENI PARYL - - -- 197934 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $51.899.56 FERRIC CHLORIDE N.0.1•-08-89 107935 INDUSTRIAL THREADED. PRODUCTS $1,915.46 COKNPE•TORS 6 INGRAM PAPER ---- _ 32.593.31 "- JANITORIAL SUFPLI88--- -�- '� . 107937 INSIGE E.P.A. WEEKLY REPORT $25.75 PUBLICATIONS 107.930 J A W SCIENTIFIC $28.49 LA3 SUPPLIES 107931 GREAT V ST RY SUPF• -�4�103r IF- JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 107940 JAYS CATERING $245.20 MEETING EXPENSE 107941 A.F. JOHNSON COMPANY $47.79 _ INSTRUMENT PARTS __......_ ___.... . __...._._ JAMAN N SUPPLY f27I.2 • ELECTRIC PARTS i 107944 RAWER COMPANY 6 SUPPLY $1,153.42 FITTINGS . 107944 KANIP COMPANY 31.153.42 TOOLS a 9 N - Y• 187946 KELLEY BLUE BOON $79.00 PUBLICATION u 197947 KENKO. INC. 120,045.30 CONSTRUCTION 5-34-2 a iAF__L--lrrrrrat�Fiz'ca-._...--.... ...... . ;��a9i.CA.. ......_ ... . CCMSTRUCTIGM PI-7I"...._..._.. _. ,. ._ - _.._.__. J• 107944 KING BEARING. INC. $44.35 MACHINE SUPPLIES •. 107950 LINUA KIRCHNER flI5.C4 MEETING EXPENSE �iCROF"17T3U3TMTAL"?;uF 6CTC£"...-. ._. .. _... .._. "" _._ . iiiS.dS.. ._".-.. _...... _.- NAROYARB ... _. . _ ... . ..____.__......"_.. .__,._. J 107952 MARTIN KOROICK. SP 32.492.30 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 14-1-ID J" r� FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST UUPNING CAPITAL IPOCLSSING DATE 6121" TAG'_ 4 REPORT NUPFCR AP43 COUNTY SANIIAIION DIST41CTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLA 1kS tAlp ''7/^9/9i POSTING DATE 67/9I/9J ' 1. � WARRANT N0. VENDOR „ AMOUNT � � LESCPIP110N . . '�. 137953 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. f69.72 SAFETY SUPPLIES • 107954 LASER SUPPLIES f SFPVICE _ $265.62,. PRINT SUPPLIES_ _ ,,,,_ 0 955 LEf. C RO CS NS ULTINS EM6P. f27.2P1.PP - ENGINEERING SERUM$ PI-33 '�• 107956 LE ROT CRANDALL L ASSOC. 1434.79 PILE DRIVING • 107957 _ JOHN LISEL PUMPS. INC. 321849.54 PUIP_PART;1 _,_.,,,, i 107959 R f L LOGIN ROOT f369.A1 LABGR PARTS '1n 107959 MOT tlI0L06iC COMPANY f2S0.4P LAB SERVICES 107960 MPS $29.75 _PEUTCGRAPHICSERVICES i ..__..t2.181.57.. --- NBCRANICAL PARTS _ . .. 'l 107962 MARINE S VALVE SUPPLY $2.692.11 VALVES ' 107963 MARVAC ELECTRONICS _f176.95 ___..__. INSTEUBHMT_SUPPLIBS.._.....__. 107969 TT - CHLOR. INC. Sl$138.99 CHLORINATION PARTS 'S, 107965 MEASUREM-CARP SUPPLY CO. $333.61 INSTRUMENT 107966 MEASUREMENT LEARNING FTS. INC. f333.61 INSTRUMENT PARTS _ 10791.7 MICRO YID 0 LEARNING SYSTEMS 31.029.75 YIDEU ERRVICES 107969 MICROSOF COMPUTER 8 fIr$38.63 COMPUTER PART 18797D - MICROSOFT USTRI BASIC INC. f48.63 _- COMPUTER PART 107971 NETT ON INDUSTRIES. . S204.70 _OFFICES X 107971 NEC ONFOR NATION SYSTEM] f5T9.89 OFFICE SUPPLIES 107973 NATIONAL LFIREUMBER PROTECTION ASSM 3155.92 PUBLICATION 107973 NATIONAL LUMBER S230.15 'W. 107979 GUST A.ERN BUSINESS SDRROU CO. f2 A 06.532.10 CONSTRUCTION CLEANING NI-33 `-' 107975 NORTHERN.RUSIMESS GROUP. INC. $4 900.09 DIGESTER CLEANING 107977 BE SYSTEMS ENERGY SYSTEMS $9 9 O.80 CHLORINE GENERATOR REPAI&S 107979 DR SYS7 EMS CO. 393$193.22 CHLORINE N.0.2-I4-90 1079TB ORANGE REARING. INC. f1 R3.2P _ tlANICAL _ .NEE_-_ .___-__._.. 10 7919 ORAN6 COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY f150.19 ELECTRIC BUPPLIEB 1 107980 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. f267.79 TRUCK PARTS O 107982 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. _ 31.896.61 _ _ CHEMICALS 107902 ORANGE N SERVICE A FITTING CO. f7$576.57 SITTINGS v 137984 OXYGEN SERVICE 357R.57 SPECIALTY CA886 107985 CSOOC fSANITKNULD MEDICAL INS.__ f100L000.OU _. SRES FUNDED WORMERS CORP INSURB_AOVANCB_____ 107985 COUNTY SA NETAT OSiRItT l9.061.97 SBIMBUB38 NOBPJSRB COMP INSURANCE J O 207986 P.J. RADCLIFFE A BONS $289.00 PUMP TESTING 107987 PSI __ .._...$91,.23 _ TRUCK WASH_PARTS 107988 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIFXENT CO. - fT.leS.lii SAFEST SUPPLIES l ' 107989 PACIFIC BELL $75R.96 TELEPHONE SERVICES 107990 PAK VEST $272.21 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 799Y _-PARTS URLINITF.O___._.__.._.____.__ ... .. _. ... ...-..S bA 1.8U .. . .___... _ . ._ ._ . TRUCK PARTS . .._. . _.__......_... ..- _� . 107992 KIM C. PATTON f90.PP MEETING EXPENSE 107993 PATTEN CORP./ TAYLOR INSTR. f1.399.P1 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1 L7950 - -� F N�iIt7-t 3S OUND CO.- _ � � - - 5976.56 OFFICE NACtlINB REPAIRS J.+ 107995 PIMA SRO SYSTEMS. INC. $43,565.75 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88 107996 _ PLANTRONICS SERVICE CENTFP 914.39 TELEPHONE EQUIPKW REPAI&___., p 9T LP3 YPU� INC. - - f7(.Al1.YS POLYMERS M.0.1-10-90,8-9-E9 J 107998 POSTMASTER $129.09 P.O. BOX RENTAL J_ FUNm(..a 9199 - Jl GIST WORKING CAPITAL FROCESSI MG DATE 1/12/90 PAGE 1( REPORT NUMBER AP43 -. COUNTY SAN17671ON DISTRICTS OF OR ANC•E COUNTY CLAIMS PA]D 0 7/I8/90 POSTING UAIE J7/1R/90 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 1O8087 AT & 1 $49D.59 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 108088 ACCURATE AIR ENGINEERING 312J.53 AIR FILTERS 108089 LINCOLN CARPETS & INTERIORS f434.66 MINIBLINDS 108090 AER0 TECH SURVEYS. INC. 110.700.60 AERIAL SURVEYING OF PLANT 2 308091 AIR ACCESSORIES CO. 1248.50 COMPRESOR PARTS 108092 AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICAL INC. f30.592.90 0&H AGREEMENT - OXYGEN CEN SYSTEM H.O.8-9-89 108093 AMER.SOC. OF HEAT.. REFRIG. & f190.00 PUBLICATIONS 208094 AMERICAN FLEET PARTS f44.56 THUM PARTS 100095 ROBCO INC. &/OR AMERICAN SEALS $11,412.14 FITTINGS 308096 AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY $1.463.06 FILM 108097 AMERITECH $97.75 COPIER LEASES 108OR098 SLAKE P. AND ERSON S1.662.23 MEETING EXPOSESE I099 ANTH ONY•S MECH. 6 MACHINE. INC $1.554.12 MECHANICAL REPAIRS I08100 APPLE ONE $898.37 TEMPORARY SERVICES 10R1DI APPLIED FILTRATION $10.T70:61 PIPE STOP PENS 108102 ABATE% SE 0.VICES. INC. f4.510.83 UNIFORM RENTALS 108103 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PROD.. INC $860.84 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS ^' m 188104 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING $3.403.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-69 X. 106105 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CO. $169.96 TRUCK PANTS 2 108106 B & T HYDRAULICS $48.16 MECHANICAL PARTS 108107 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $203,848.75 GRIT REMOVAL H.O.7-I3-88 7 106108 BABSON & SHEPPARD $6,000.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES -011, LEASES -� 108109 BACKSTREET GALLERY 11.360.01 FRAMING ,. ' w 108110 BANK OF AMERICA FIT & SA $5,094,515.11 CERTIF OF PARTICIPATION - INSTALL PATIENT 100111 BA%TER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $2,453.76 TAB SUPPLIES H 108112 BAYLESS STATIONERS $1.103.41 OFFICE SUPPLIES 168113 BISHOP COMPANY f525.27 HARDWARE 108114 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $170.00 TRUCK REPAIRS 108115 BON-A-RUES f106.25 TRUCK PARTS 108116 O YLE ENGINEERING CORP $39,755.16 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-II 108117 BROWN & CAL DWELL B $6.881.25 LAS SERVICES 108118 BROWN & CALDWELL CONSULTING $26,921.58 ENGINEERING SERVICES P2-37 108119 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. 9226.41 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES .� 108120 GARY G. STREET) S518.50 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 108121 CS COMPANY $6.296.45 VALVE PARTS 108122 CAL-CHEM SALES $369.64 HARDWARE J 108123 CAL-CLASS FOR RESEARCH. INC. $1.219.44 LAB SUPPLIES 106124 CALTROL . INC. $67.40 REGULATOR PARTS 108125 CALIFORNIA SUPRESSION SYSIENS $555.00 HALON MAINTENANCE .� 108126 CAROLED ENGINEERS CEPS ftl.50 P.32 ENGINEERING SERVICES ES d7-171 1OB127 CEDAR COMPUTER CENTER. INC. $1,339.79 LAB EQUIPMENT 108120 CENTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM $45.48 TELEPP^NE SYSTEM MODIFICATION .� 108129 CHALLENGE BEARING & IND. SPLY $1,564.12 HARDWARE 108130 CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC. f2.20T.77 DIESEL FUEL 108131 CHURCH ENGINEERING. INC. $117.13 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-13 J 1OR132 COLICH AND SONS ST.901.46 EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIRS DIST 2 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE T/12/95 PAGE. 2 REPORT NUMBER evq] COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 97/10/9. POSTING DATE 117/I0/9G '1 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT ❑ESCRIPTION .� 108I33 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF $12,022.59 COMPRESSOR PARTa 108134 CONNELL G.M. PARTS / DIV. $207.41 TRUCK PARTS 1OR135 CON-WAY WESTERN EXPRESS $73.61 FREIGHT 108136 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. $9.U46.91 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 108137 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS S6.465.94 BLUEPRINTING H.O.1-10-90 108138 CONTRACTOR'S BOOK STORE $141.76 PUBLICATION '1 108139 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS WEST S2.J47.73 ENGINEERING SERVICES 108140 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $177.36 TRUCK PARTS 208141 CRANE VEYOR CORP. $296.82 PAINT SUPPLIES 108142 CREATIVE SCREEN ARTS S5D3.29 SAFETY SUPPLIES 108143 CRYSTAL CLEAR WINDOW MAINT. f2.115.00 WINDOW CLEANING 108144 CAL WATER f190.75 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 10R145 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT f0.725.58 STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE I08146 STATE OF CALIFORNIA f33.011.00 89'-90' SALES TAX LIABILITY 108147 DAILY PILOT f36.00 NOTICES 6 ADS 7 108148 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE $364.91 TIRES 108149 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $431.27 PRINTING 108150 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. f345.CU SERVICE AGREEMENT 7. X 108151 DORADO ENTERPRISES. INC. $1,596.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS 2 108152 DORY-OLIVER, INC. fB5D.01 MECHANICAL PARTS 108153 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $2,186.00 PAINT SUPPLIES IOB154 ERA SERVICES. INC. $12.740.79 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-23-2 108155 EASTMAN9 INC. $2,388.85 OFFICE SUPPLIES 108156 EBERHARD EQUIPMENT f66.51 TRUCK PARTS 108157 ELECTRONIC BALANCING CO. $500.00 IMPELLER N 108158 ENCHANTER. INC. $2.200.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.3-14-90 159 FACILITIE PORT .398.512 TOOL 110OB160 JOHN B. FALSENSTEINO.E. 935620 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-4.J-20.1-17 1O6161 FARR SALES B SERVICE $557.95 FILTERS 108162 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. 5336.00 AIR MIGHT J 108163 FERRELLGAS f22.95 PROPANE 108164 FISCHER B PORTER CO. $2.689.57 CHLORINATION PARTS 1 Ofl 165 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. fL27.50 LAB SUPPLIES 108166 FLAT R VERTICAL CONCRETE $459.75 CONCRETE CUTTING 106167 FOLSOM LAKE FORD 188,533.81 TRUCKS M.O.5-9-90' 106168 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA SB61.55 FILM .� 108169 FOX ENTERPRISES f1'825.OU SAFETY CONSULTAN'C 108170 THE FOXBORO CO. $797:46. ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 108272 CITY OF FULLERTON $R361 WATER USEAGE .J 108172 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $6.008.81 TELEPHONE SERVICES JOB173 GIERLICH-MITCHELL. INC. $17,303.33 MECHANICAL PARTS 108174 HAROLD GOLDBERG 5116.75 1/17 BACK-UP CLAIM J 108175 DON GREEK f ASSOCIATES f4.368.75 SURVEYING SERVICES US 88-72 100176 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $135.57 CAUSE 108177 HATCH B KIRK. INC. f11.4G9.37 MECHANICAL PARTS :.1 108178 HAUTER FORD $17,738.15 AUTOMOBILES M.O.4-I1-90 F UNh- 0 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/12/90 PAGE' REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/15/90 POSTING DATE 07/18/90 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 108271 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT 4 $95,715.29 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-13-90 108272 SEA COAST DESIGNS $229.69 OFFICE MACHINE REPAIRS ,1 10P273 SEAL ENGINEERING CO. $341.75 PUMP PARTS 108274 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $376.36 PAINT SUPPLIES 168275 SHEPHERD MACHINERY CO. $1,970.73 TRUCK PARTS ,1 108276 SKVPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $1,211.00 PHYSICAL EXAMS 100277 SMITH-EMERY CO. $1,347.50 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-I4-89 108278 SOLAR TURBINES INC. $1,288.28 TURBINE REPAIRS 208279 SOUTH COAST DODGE $102.85 TRUCK PARTS 108280 SOUTH COAST PLAZA $2.510.63 1/17 BACK-UP CLAIM 108281 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. $18.500.64 POWER 108282 SO. CAL. GAS CO. $4.00R.02 NATURAL GAS 108263 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $5.117.00 DIESEL FUEL 108284 SOUTHWEST MATERIAL HANDLING $761.55 FREIGHT 108285 STAMEN Z. SPASSOFF. P.E. $5,200.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-162 7" 108286 WESTALLOY INC. $210.06 WELDING SUPPLIES j ' 106287 SPECTRER $629.88 MITER 108280 STAR TOOL L SUPPLY CO. $1,804.71 TOOES 7; rn 108289 STERLING ART $73.23 GRAPIIC SERVICES = 108290 SUMMIT STEEL $522.54 STEEL 108291 SUNSET FORD $22.122.30 TRUCK 308292 SUPER CHEM CORP $658.75 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES '..� 188293 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL. INC. $2.55R.21 TOOLS 108294 SUR-LITE CORPORATION $63.596.63 WASTE GAS FLARES 7 � 308295 T L C INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS. INC $1.960.79 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES , ul 108296 TALIN TIRE. INC. $131.58 TIRES 100297 TAYLOR-DUNN $152.19 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 108298 7EXMATE. INC. $161.02 METER 100299 CHARLES E. THOMAS $869.20 TRUCK PARTS 108300 TOP INDUSTRIAL $33.46 BUILDING MATERIAL 7 108301 TOTAL PREVENTION SYSTEMS i3A8.00 ENGINEEERING SERVICES 1.-27-1 118302 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE. INC. $153.70 SAPETT PUPPLIES 108303 TRAVEL TRAVEL $379.00 TRAVEL SERVICES I08304 TRUCK L AUTO SUPPLY. INC. $1,020.52 TRUCK PARTS 108305 J.G. TUCKER L SON, INC. 6637.62 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 108306 U.3. AUTO GLASS CENTER.INC. $116.83 TRUCK PARTS '7 108307 UNOCAL S279.17 GASOLINE 108308 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $240.29 PARCEL SERVICES 168309 VWR SCIENTIFIC $1.897.88 LAB SUPPLIES '.� 108310 MALIN CORPORATION $464.34 REGULATOR PARTS 108311 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $8.366.97 MRDWARE/FITTINGS 108312 VERTEX SYSTEMS $7.259.00 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT ./ 106313 VICI METRONICS $306.56 MECHANICAL PARTS 108314 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $877.18 SAFETY SUPPLIES 109315 VILLAGE NURSERIES 3571.88 GROUND COVER J 108316 JOHN R. MAPLES $531.50 ODOR CONTROL CONSULTANT v FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/12/90 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER RP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 67/18/90 POSTING DATE 07/1019.1 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 200317 WATERMAN SUPPLY 5398.44 GRAIN 108318 WEIR OIL CO. 524.09 REFUND USER HE OVERPAYMENT 1 108319 WESTERN PACIFIC EQUIPMENT CO. $451.84 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 108320 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY $37.536.37 CAUSTIC SODA M.O. 8-9-89 10832L WESCO $236.86 ELECTRIC PART 208322 XEROX CORP. $7.192.36 COPIER LEASES 1 208323. GEORGE YARDLEY COMPANY $397.30 .VALVE PARTS 108321 EVERETT H. YORK CO. $512.58 ENGINE PARTS ., 108325 LUCY 2AHRAN. INC. _ -_� -$5.250.90_ 1l17 BACK-UP CLAIM TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 07/18/90 $6.504,635.51 '�.• cccv ve====vicev=es b � - SUMMARY AMOUNT 7 !1 OPER PUNU ! . T !I CONST FUND 1,075,501.41 120547 7�.X 02 OPER POND I2.041.43 S 92 CAP PAC FUND 951.05 co 12 CONST FUDD 1.914,049.63 l !3 OPER FUND 12.045.74 ! .-I 03 CAP PAC PUNU 0.062.65 ' 03 CUERT FUND 2,090,062.56 05 OPER FUND 4,364.12 Ch 15 GAP PAC FUND 4,525.75 !6 OPER FUND 173.64 '7 07 OPER FUND 42.237.95 07 COY PAC FORD 41,573.51 Ull OPER FUND 1.573.51 !14 OPER FUND 22.00 !14 CAP PAC FUND 3,537.99 J. 666 OPER RUND 9,738.03 JT OPER FUND 368.265.20 SELFCORF 3L7,165.20 SELF FUNDED WORKING CAS COMP INSURANCB FUND 91,899.56 JT DIBT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 19I,899.Sfi J $ 6,504,550.51 J J FIIA.. —0 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/12/9G PA6L REPORT NUMPCR A,P43 C0UW7Y SANI7AT ION DI SIR ICIS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLA1M9 FAID 07/I11/qn POSTING DATE 11T/16/9d WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 108179 S. A. HEALY CO. $80341,72 SEWER REPAIR DIST 7 ID8180 MOUSE OF BATTERIES $116.47 BATTERIES 108181 STEVEN J HOVEY 1495.00 MEETING EXPENSE 108182 R.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. $4.316.28 HARDWARE 200183 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 116.855.52 - WATER USEAGE HOB 184 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STAMP $2.484.24 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1OB185 ENERGY SERVICES GROUP $922.44 ENGINE PARTS 108186 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $69.916.58 FERRIC CHLORIDE N.0.11-08-89 108187 INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS. INC. t7B7.95 ELECTRIC CARTS 1U81B8 INOU STR JAL THE EA ED PR OOUCTS 31.127.15 CONNECTORS 100189 INGRAM PAPER $118.89 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 108190 INTERNATIONAL SENSOR TECH. $1,361.63 INSTRUMENT PARTS 108191 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $27.07 WATER USEACE 100292 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP. $460.81 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 108193 JAY'S CATERING 5623.58 MEETING EXPENSE .� 108194 KAM AN BEAR INGS B SUPPLY 310.50 FITTINGS 108195 KANER COMPANY $715.38 TOOLS 108196 KEENAN SUPPLY $313.62 WAVLE 7 'X 108197 KEITH-STEVENS. INC. 120.U00.00 MAINTENANCE SYSTEM STUDY = 108198 KEN-S OIL. INC. $170.00 WASTE OIL DISPOSAL 108199 KING BEARING. INC. $6.125.42 NACMINE SUPPLIES 108200 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 3983.71 HARDWARE —j 108201 MARTIN KOROICK, SR 32.445.30 WINSIIUCTION SERVICES 14-I-I0.5-35-1.5-36-1 108202 KRIEGER PUBLISHING CO. INC. $66.60 PUBLICATION 'W. 108203 LASER SUPPLIES A SERVICE $509.79 PRINT SUPPLIES W 10820q LEE 6 RO CONSULTING ENGR. $30,010.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-33 108205 LE ROY CRANDALL 6 ASSOC. $2.653.21 ENGINEERING SERVICES - GEOTECHNICAL 208206 LIFECOM-SAFETY SERVICE SUPPLY $276.71 STROBE LIGHT 168207 LIMITOROUE CORP. $1.680.36 INSTRUMENT PART 118218 LOTUS DEVEL. COPR. 1360.V0 COlRUTER SOFTWARE 108209 A.J. LYNCH [0. $110.20 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ID8210 NBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $6,055.00 OCR" MONITORING 108211 MACOMCO $ 187.20 SERVICE AGREEMENTS '•7 108212 MAIN FRAME SERVICES 3R60.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIR 108213 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $17.62 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 108214 MATT - CHLOR. INC. $2.826.25 CHLORINATION PARTS J 108215 DON MAURER $5,550.DO OCEAN STUDY 108216 MAXWELL COLORS 568.66 FIM DEVELOPING 1 OB 217 MCKENNA ENGR. 6 EDDIP. 1q.392.87 MECHANICAL PARTS .� HOP 218 MCNINLEY EWU IPNENT CORP l287.tl4 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 108219 MCMASTER-CARP SUPPLY CO. 1595.33 BENCH 209220 THOMAS R. MELTON $272.37 TRAVEL EXPENSE .� 108221 MICROAGE COMPUTER 32.492.12 COMPUTER SOMML.'HARDWARE 108222 MILLAR ELEVATOR SERVICE $2.432.67 ELEVATOR NAINTENAM.? 108223 MONITEK. INC. $2,114.93 METER PARTS .� 108224 MONTGOMERY LABORATOPIFS $6,074.25 LAB SERVICES J b FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WOPKINL CAPITAL PROCESSING PATE 7/12/9l1 PtGE R REPORT NUMBER AF13 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0/1L/9P POSTING DATE .711P/40 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 108225 MORGAN CRANE CO.. INC. $149.66 TRUCK PARTS 108226 NATIONAL LUMBER $526.II0 HARDWARE 10B 227 NEW HERNE S. INC. f66.93 NAMEPLATE MATERIALS 10822E NEYA WAR ELECTp ON 3114.45 INSTRUAb.7 PART 108229 SY NIELSON SERVICE . INC. $177.50 LAB REPAIRS 1 108230 O.M.S./SOLAG DISPOSAL CO f2.925.00 TRASH BIN REMOVAL 10P231 OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL DDpP. 186.80 LAB SUPPLIES 108232 OFFICE PAVILION/INTERIOR RES. $1.275.69 OFFICE FURNITURE J-7-5 108233 DR SYSTEMS CO. f32.67T.63 CHLORINE I.O.2-16-90 IOR234 ORANGE BEARING. INC. $470.35 HARDWARE 108235 OXYGEN SERVICE 5883.22 SPECIALTY GASES 118236 COUNTY OF ORANGE $6,810.00 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES 118237 CO UNIT SANITATION DISTRICT $9,245.58 REIMBURSE WORKERS CHIP INSURANCE 108238 PSI $563.10 PUMP PART 108239 PACIFIC PARTS $749.90 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 7 108240 PACIFIC PROCESS EOUIPMENT.INC. $933.51 VAVVE PARTS 108241 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $998.36 SAFETY SUPPLIES 1 1 108242 PACTEL CELLULAR f91.68 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES f1 108243 PAGE ONE $53.13 PRINTING 108244 PARTS ENGINEERING COMPANY $111.05 COMPUTER PARTS 108245 PARTS UNLIMITED $790.98 TRUCK PARTS 7� 108246 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS. INC. $47,101.15 SLUDGE REMOVAL H.O.5-11-88 ...� 108247 PLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE $65.48 HARDWARE 108248 PLASTIC INDUSTRIES f304.09 PLASTIC BOTTLES 108OB249 POLYPURE, INC. 915,933.04 POLYMERS M.0.1-I0-90.8-9-89 I250 POWER SYSTEMS $2,927.27 ELECTRIC REPAIRS 108251 PRENTICE - HALL. INC. $57.64 PUBLICATIONS �. 108252 MAROLD PRIMROSE ICE S184.00 ICE ID8253 PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEMS $377.62 CONTROL BOARD 1 OB 259 THE PROJECTS SOLUTION CO. f3.e16.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION N.0.8-10-88 10 A 255 PU LS AFE EDER 3316.77 PUMP PARTS 108256 PUMP ENGINEERING CO. $19,859.91 PUMP PARTS 108257 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $968.06 MEN DISPOSAL 108258 RECYC, INC. S40.280.00 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0,5-I1-88 106259 R.A. REED ELECTRIC $4,769.32 MOTOR REPAIR IOB260 REMDTE METER RESETTING SYSTEM f3.000.00 POSTAGE 1OB 261 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. a373.A6 FITTINGS 108262 ROACH WATER TECHNOLOGY. INC. $135.12 VALVE PARTS 118263 ROBINSON FERTILIZER CO. 56.193.75 NEED KILLER .� 106269 ROSE MONT ANALYTICAL $1.436.57 ANALYSER PARTS 108265 ROSEMOUNT/UNILOC 565.8E FITTINGS 106266 ALBERT G. ROTHET. LTD. $527.94 IDOL ., 108267 RUTAN B TUCKER $23.529.27 LEGAL SERVICES - BEATRICE/HUNT WESSON 108268 JOSEPH T. RYERSON L SON. INC. 1267.40 STEEL 1OB269 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. $2,716.25 PARTS CLEANER 118270 SAMIA ANA CANVAS CO. 3528.IR ELECTRIC PARTS J ' \ Fb_ NO 91-9 JT DIST VOPMING CAFITAL FPOCESSIN6 OAIE 6/27/9 PA6E PEPORT NUMPER Al 13 ._ . __ Cf;y"TY_ SANI TAIION. 01 SIRICTS_OF QPANCE_C OUNIY_flA1M3 fAIO %1%14/5R POSTING nniE 07/09/95 1a a WARRANT NO. VE.NOOP..._ ... .. _ ._ AMOUNT . . . ._ ._ .. DESCRIPTIOM .. . _. _...._.._ 107999 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. $14.41 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES • 00809 _pCg,S CNLLIO_n_PgQ kULT S __. _. __}330..b 3____. ____.. OFFICE SUPPLIES_...—.. l0000t HAROLO PRIMROSE ICE f156.00 ICE 'l• 108085 PRIM TIPS R FAX 515.00 INSTRUMENTATION MACHINE REPAIRS • . 106003 - THE PROJECTS SOLU71�DOy__.__.. __... __ __ ._.41,2?4.J0._ __.._----- .. SLUDGE INSPECTION X.O.Brl0-S8. 168005 RELY C. INC. fg 9.289.P0 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.3-11-88 'ln 1G8005 RED VALVE CO,. INC. 3223 AO SALES TAR n 108086 _ RED VIN65110ES 0:5I__._.____ _.__ . ._.._ 04FXTY SNQ¢S._—...._.__. 108007 PENS DY TCNF' $1,185.20 TEMPORARY SERVICES 100008 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. S5.003.66 FITTINGS 198009 RICHARDS• WATSON-2 6ERSNQN }@.t n0,7r S.0 LECAL_SERVI993_11.4.,4_0_87_ 108010 J. R. RDRFRTS CORP. $24.144.86 CONSTRUCTION J-7-6 IORG11 J. R. P.ORFRTS $125,940.64 CONSTRUCTION J-17 .-. � 108012 J. R. ROBERTS 3j1..i51xQSCONSTRUCTION-J_2.0 108913"'" ,ROBINSON FERTILIZER CO. $1,936.63 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 0 I08014 ' " 'ROYCE INSTRUMENT S1.036.97 INSTRUMENT PART 208015 ' UTAN.t TUCKER _ S32tQj .2l _ _LEGAL_S¢NVEG&S_-_B¢AIEICELE=_WESSQN__. 1 108016 SAFETY-KLEEN CDRP. IA6.40 PARTS CLEANSE .X 168017 KIN SAKAMOTO S115.00 FETING MEESE Z 108018 SANCON ENGINEERING . INC. _ $260t852•140 _ 108019 ; `SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $401.24 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 1fl8020 : SCHULER E NIINEERINI'.CORP. f124 H11.18 CONSTRUCTION P1-27-162 108021' SCIERTIFIC ELECTRONICS SERV. IORD22 SEA COAST DESIGNS S432.4q OFFICE FURNITURE Q •n 108623 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1.795.93 HARDWARE 1Jl 108824 SHEPHERD MACHINERY CO. __$2..}gLg9 _ __—_KEGXAHICAL_PARTB._____. 108025 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $1.410.00 PHYSICAL EXAMS ti 108026 SMITH-EMERY Co. $2.599.50 SOIL TESTING N.O.6-14-89 108021 SOFT WAREHOUSE 11T 015.x93 COMPIITRRs4Qp'111ARE.___.____.____.______._ 1080211 SOLAR TURBINES INC. $45,156.25 GENERATOR REPAIR N.O. 3-9-90 108029 SO. COAST AIR QUALITY f10.224.C6 APPLICATION FEES 108030 ED. CALIF. GOASTAL WATER ,. �31y59U.00 108031 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. f345.153.111 POWER 108032 SO. CALIF. EDISON CO. $5,915.00 POWER POLE RELOCATION DIST 7 A 14 10603E $0. CAL. GAS,Ws __. _§269.02. __._.- __. _.._._ NATURALGAS._._..—. 108034 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. S2.908.99 DIESEL FUEL 308035 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER st.36 N7.81 WATER/COOLER RETALS . 10R036 VESIALLOY INC.__ . _ . S1 xRYi.Sv OELDINGSUPFLIES 108037 STAR TOOL x SUPPLY CO. s516.11 TO01S J u 108238 SUMMIT STEEL $1,212:37 FETAL 108039 SUPER CHEN CORP i5g5.GU _ CHEMICALS _.__—_ . .__ ____ .. _ .. _. _ ]OE049 CONTINENTAL AIR TOUL. INC. 27.672.63 TOOLS J 108042 SUP-CITE CORPORATION 5$1.463.75 WASTE CAS PARTS N.0.6-13-90 108043 T 8 C INUUSTP IA L_fONiF OSSt.I NC_. __. ..___4l•263.7b _. TRUELECK IC PARISRTS___ 208043 TAYEQR-DUNN 2$76.37 TRUCE PARTS 1Dfl Q44 1T EQUIPMENT COMPANY f76.3T SAFETY SIGH • I FUND NO yl^° - JT OISI WOPMINF CrFITAL FROCES87NC, DATE 6/27/^" IAGE F REPORT NUMBER At93 COUNTY SANIIAIION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS FAIR 0/.i9/9:. POSTING DATE f3j09/90 '1 . WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION "� . IO8095 TOP INDUSTRIAL 533..2 BUILDING MATERIAL 106046 TRAVEL TRAVEL $726.9L TRAVEL_ SERVICES ' r 108047 ifTIUR-FT11T0-$ PP ULY. INC. -- . .... ...._--..f N9691. . TRUCK PARTS 108048 J.G. TUCNCN S SON. INC. S396.73 INSTRUMENT PARTS , 1OBO49 VNITEO PARCEL SERVICE $18I.18 PARCEL SERVICES D�iljO - VYR SZIE�[FIC ..... . AB ._.._._ __.._____11.663.9L.....__.__. .__._____ - WB SUPFLI4B.-. IDR051 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $7,799.45 - FITTINGS 108452 MICHAEL H. VON YINCNELMANN S115.90 MEETING MINOR nIOB053 VORTEX - - -- l,1 9.56 DOOR INSTALWTION - _ IGAP54 CARL WARREN 8 CO. S838.55 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR a 108055 WESTERN CORPORATE IMAGES S8,312.89___ OFFICE OIng ____-_ ___-.. __-__....._..._.__.__...._.__-____._. Y 0 6 Y S ERN IGHVAY F C , TIC. iz33.O�e SAFETY SUPPLIES 108057 WESTERN PACIFIC EQUIPMENT CO. ST36.R8 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 108055 VESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY $34.508.86 CAUSTIC SODA H.0.B-9-89 losopq _ ,S, .. I S_ T&UCH PARTS 108060 YILBUR-EL LIS COMP ANY s1,030.63 INSECTICIDE 108061 JOHN QTLEY.A SONS. 3NC. _ S3.93 PUBLICATION _ 1 A62 AEROM CORP. $1,510.62 COSIER LEASES F>I] 109063 7IEBARTH AND ALPER S566,216.60 CONSTRUCTION P2-37,P1-34-1 X --..------..------- pry TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 07/84/90 58.854,2R5136 SUMMARY ANOUNT 11 CAP PAC I= - 176,231.76 /3 OPER PUND 323.607.26 A 05 OPER FUND 176.58 05 CAP FAC FUND 28,978.72 . 07 CAP FAC POND 183,380.77 011 OPER FUND 16.54 _._62:30--..___ _.____._ ___..._._......... . ..._ ..__..__..____... F14 CAP PAC FORD 206,332.91 P566 OPER FUND 1.865.20 „a 56ECAP-FAC1rOR - __ _ _ _..—._. ______..__..-1;715:29'-___—.__-..._...__._ _ __.___.._.._ _-.__ .___. 14 :>., 0761 OPER FUND 3,348.35 F7614 OPER FUND 4,769.45 �01NT-DEER-POND-__.___ _--.___ _._____..___ __ _ - .. _.896,769]65 ... J , CORE 6,710,901.54 _ SELF FURROW WORKERS COMP INSURANCE 104,900.52 110RRING�AFITAf'FUND 206,970.22 -_ _. . 4 8,854,285.36 � J y i STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954. 2, I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting on 19q O was duly posted for public inspection at the Ain lobby of the Districts' offices on 1910. IN (((��WITN"""ESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of 1940. Ritwn, Secretary each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 , 2, 3 , 5, 6 , 7 , 11 , 13 & 14 of Orange County, California