Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1990-07-11
p1T Til COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-0127 c,M1� IO ELLIS.FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714)962-2411 July 5, 1990 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 WEDNESDAY, JULY 11, 1990 - 7 :30 P .M. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain valley, California The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 , 2, 3, 5 , 6 , 7, 11 , 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. S cretary Tentatively-Scheduled Upcoming Meetings : EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Thursday, July 12th, at 5: 30 p.m. FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - Wednesday, July 18th, at 5 : 30 p.m. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday, July 25th, at 5 : 30 p.m. CONSERVATION, - Thursday, July 26th, at 5 : 30 p.m. RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE \.' BUILDING COMMITTEE - Tuesday, July 31st, at 5: 30 p.m. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS cl ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA 106A ELLIS AVENUE PO BOX 8127 iOUNTAM VALLEY.GLIGOPNIA 92:1 j nln BA23AH JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings July Jul 11, 1990 E Jul 25, 1990 August Aug 08, 1990 None Scheduled September Sep 12, 1990 Sep 26, 1990 October Oct 10, 1990 Oct 24, 1990 November Nov 14, 1990 None Scheduled December Dec 12, 1990 None Scheduled January Jan 09, 1991 Jan 23, 1991 February Feb 13, 1991 Feb 27, 1991 March Mar 13 , 1991 Mar 27, 1991 April Apr 10, 1991 Apr 24, 1991 May May 08, 1991 May 29, 1991 June Jun 12, 1991 Jun 26 , 1991 July Jul 10, 1991 Jul 24, 1991 u .9QARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P.O.Box 8127.10844 Ells Avenue of Orange Counts.California Fountain Valley.CA 9272"127 Telephone:(714)962-2411 JOINT BOARDS AGENDA REGULAR MEETING JULY 11, 1990 - 7:30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary. in the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll Call (3 ) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See- listing in Board Meeting folders) (5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on spec agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes . (6 ) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors . (a) Report of Joint Chairman+ , _- (b) Report of General Manager (c) Report of General Counsel (7) Annual election of Joint Chairman �✓ (Nominee: Director A. B. "Buck" Catlin) (8) Annual election of vice Joint Chairman 7/11/89 - J (9) EACH DISTRICT ACTIN no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman: _ District 1 - June 13, 1990 regular District 2 - June 13, 1990 regular District 3 - June 13, 1990 regular District 5 - June 13, 1990 regular District 6 - June 13, 1990 regular District 7 - June 13, 1990 regular District 11 - June 13, 1990 regular District 13 - June 13, 1990 regular District 14 - June 13, 1990 regular (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District. ) See pages W and "B" 6/06/90 6/20/90 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 918,175.98 $ 673,452.21 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 7,532,152.00 331,418.17 Joint Working Capital Fund - 116,375 .26 184,104.17 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 13,256.68 9,006 . 36 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 30:48 64.19 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 217,916.85 23,653 .45 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 144,569.06 35,416 .21 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 198,604.12 32,708.28 DISTRICT NO. 6 - -0- 189.25 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 554,704.14 14,734.28 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 303 .55 6,462.56 DISTRICT NO. 13 - -0- -0- DISTRICT NO. 14 1,095,834.75 2,469.75 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 14, 392.53 1,010.52 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 1,977.49 -0- DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 3 ,009 .68 769 .40 $10,811,302.57 $1, 315,458.80 1 -2- ^ 7/11/90 ( 11) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 11(a) THROUGH 11(r) All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director,- staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. The Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. - Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of the following resolutions authorizing and directing execution and filing of documents necessary for Federal and State Clean Water Grants and Loans under 33 U.S.C. , 1251 at seq. ; Chapters 12.5, 13, 14 and 15; and Division 7 of the California Water Code, and providing certain assurances in connection with the 1990-91 Joint Works Improvements and Additions: See page C. District No. Resolution No. 1 90-66-1 2 90-67-2 3 90-68-3 5 90-69-5 6 90-70-6 7 90-71-7 11 90-72-11 13 90-73-13 14 90-74-14 -3- 7/11/90 (11 ) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) a (b) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications for -. Prepurchase and Installation of variable Frequency Drive Systems and Pumps for Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15A, authorizing a deduction of $72,000.00 from the contract with General Electric Company for the difference between design and actual efficiency ratings for the equipment, as provided in the contract specifications. See page "D" (c) Consideration of the following actions relative to Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20, and Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts; and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31: (1 ) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 30 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing a net deduction of $35,426 .58 from the contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. for 15 items of additional or deleted work. See page -El- (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-75, accepting said project as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. See page "F" (d) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33 , authorizing an addition of $21 ,667 .00 to the contract with Gust K. Newberg Construction Co. for two Stems of additional work. See page "G" (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Gas Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. If Job No. P1-34-1, authorizing an addition of $52,748 .00 to the contract with Ziebarth a Alper for four items of additional work. See page H. (f) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-2, authorizing an addition of $32,443.52 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. for eight items of additional work. See page "I" -4- 7/11/90 ' (11) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (g) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 9 to the plans and specifications for Miscellaneous Modifications and Improvements to Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-37, authorizing an addition of $115,453.00 to the contract with 2lebarth a Alper for seven items of additional work. See page J. (h) Consideration of motion ratifying action of staff relative to issuance of a purchase order to Dorado Enterprises, Inc. in a total amount not to exceed $39,500.00 for emergency modifications to the City of Fountain valley water lines serving the Administration Building, Laboratory and Maintenance/warehouse complex at Plant No. 1 required by the City and State Health Department. (i) Consideration of motion amending the Boards' action on May 9, 1990, authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to F. E. Carleton in an amount not to exceed $50,000.00 for professional consulting services, on an as-needed basis, for a two-year period beginning May 10, 1990, to assist the Districts in obtaining permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) for current and future projects at both treatment plants, and for assistance relative to other SCAQMD issues, correcting the hourly rate for said services from $95.00 to $115.00. (j ) Consideration of motion amending the Boards' action on December 13, 1989 relative to participation in the Pooled Emissions Estimation Plan (PEEP) with other POTWs in California to conduct necessary testing at a considerable savings re compliance with the California Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Inventory and Assessment Act of 1987 (AB2588) , increasing the authorized amount for the Districts' participation from an amount not to exceed $500,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $750,000.00 for additional Districts' site-specific sampling and analysis required to comply with said Act. (k) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to South Coast Air Quality Management District in an amount not to exceed $300,000.00 for payment of various fees required by SCAQMD regulations, payable during fiscal year 1990-91, estimated as follows: Type of Fee Amount Annual Emissions $94,000 Annual Operating Permit 45,000 Permit Evaluation 28,000 Hot Spots, Toxics and Precursors 18,000 Source Test Analysis 60,000 �../ Miscellaneous Fees 55,000 TOTAL $300,000 -5- 7/11/90 (11 ) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint to Enforce Stop Notice; on Payment Bond; for Breach of Written Contract; Common Counts and on Contractors License Bond, Acme Rents, Inc. vs. Tierra Industrial Builders, Inc. , et al. , Orange County Municipal Court-West Judicial District Case No. 162859, relative to a previous Stop Notice filed in connection with Warehouse and Maintenance Building and oil Storage and Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20; and authorize the Districts' General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. See page "K" (m) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint to Enforce Stop Notice and Complaint on Payment Bond, Carpenters Southern California Administrative Corporation vs. Orange County Sanitation Districts, et al. , Orange County Municipal Court-West Judicial District Case No. 163462, relative to a previous Stop Notice filed in connection with Warehouse and . Maintenance Building and Oil Storage and Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20; and authorize the Districts ' General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts . See page "L" DISTRICT 2 (n) Consideration of the following actions relative to North Branch of the Rolling Hills Drive Relief Subtrunk Sewer (and City of Brea sewer) , Contract No. 2-11-3 : (1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of $87 ,590.00 to the contract with Colich e Sons (JV) for six items of additional work and granting a time extension of 145 calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page "M" (2) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an adjustment of engineer' s quantities for a net deduction of $4,442.00. See page "N" ( 3 ) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-83-2, accepting said project as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. See page "0" -6- 7/11/90 (11 ) DISTRICT 7 (o) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Abandonment of Lane Road Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-1, and Abandonment of Castlerock and Dow Avenue Pump Stations and Modifications to MacArthur Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-3, authorizing an addition of $27,913 .00 to the contract with Colich 6 Sons (JV) for two items of additional work and granting a time extension of six calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page "P" (p) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-87-7, approving plans and specifications for Campus Relief Sewer, between von Karman Avenue and Jamboree Boulevard, Contract No. 7-13, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. See page I.Q..— (q) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-88-7, approving Agreement with County of Orange, providing for the adjustment of manhole covers and clean-outs on District sewers in conjunction with the County's 1989-90 street resurfacing program in unincorporated County areas within District No. 7, and providing for payment of the actual cost of the manhole adjustment plus 10% for inspection and administrative costs for approximately 302 manholes, at a per-manhole unit cost not to exceed $220.00 nor be less than $155 per manhole; and for clean-outs, at a per-clean-out unit cost not to exceed $176 .00 nor be less than $125 .00 per clean-out; and authorizing payment of required deposit of $66,968.00 for said work. See page "R" DISTRICT 11 (r) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint for Personal Injury, John L. Smith vs. City of Huntington Beach, st al. , Orange County Superior Court Case No. 571306; and authorize the Districts ' General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. See page "S" END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (12) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items deleted from Consent `..� Calendar, if any -7- 7/11/90 (13) ALL DISTRICTS ` (a) Report of the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee's written report of the . . meeting on June 28, 1990 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) (b) Consideration of action on items recommended by said Committee: (1) Consideration of motion approving Amendment No. 3 to Agreement for Removal, Processing and Disposal of Sewage Solids with Recyc, Inc. , providing for an extension of the term of said agreement to February 11, 1991, with no change in the current agreement provisions and cost ($380.00 per truck load) , and providing for annual extension of said agreement by the General Manager upon mutual agreement, in form approved by the General Counsel. (2) Consideration of motion approving Agreement with L. Curti Truck and Equipment for removal, processing and disposal of Districts' solids residuals, for a period expiring April 12, 1991, at a cost of $380.00 per truck load from Plant No. 1 and $420.00 per truck load from Plant No. 2, and providing for annual extension of said agreement by the General Manager upon mutual agreement, in form approved by the General Counsel. (14) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee's written report of the meeting on June 27, 1990 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) . (b) Consideration of action on items recommended by said Committee: (1) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-89, establishing District procedures for settlement of Workers- Compensation claims made against the Districts. See page "T" (2) Consideration of motion ratifying action of Fiscal Policy Committee in placing statutory Excess workers' Compensation insurance coverage, with $250,000 self-insured retention, effective July 1, 1990, for an annual premium not to exceed $36,257.00. (3) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-84, approving policy re furnishing vehicles for management personnel and repealing Resolution No. 73-15 and all other previ.,us resolutions pertaining thereto. (4) Individual Jistrict Budgets: (a) Staff report re proposed fiscal year 1990-91 budgets [ITEM (14) (b) (4) CONTINUED ON PAGE 91 -8- ' (14) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 8) 7/11/90 (b) (4) (b) DISTRICT 1 Rol ca vote approving 1990-91 fiscal year budget in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 13,742,000 Capital Facilities Fund 17 ,261,000 Construction Fund - 1986 4,034,000 Construction Fund - 1990 25, 313,000 TOTAL $ 60, 350,000 (c) DISTRICT 2 Roll call vote approving 1990-91 fiscal year budget in the following amounts: Operating Fund 5 35,161,000 Capital Facilities Fund 64,996,000 Construction Fund - 1986 11,949,000 Construction Fund - 1990 76 ,002,000 TOTAL $188,108,000 (d) DISTRICT 3 Roll vote approving 1990-91 fiscal year budget in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 42,645,000 Capital Facilities Fund 69,836,000 Construction Fund - 1986 13 ,496,000 Construction Fund - 1990 81,883 ,000 Bond 8 Interest Fund - 1951 269 ,000 TOTAL $208,129 ,000 (e) DISTRICT 5 Roll call vote approving 1990-91 fiscal year budget in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 9,673,000 Capital Facilities Fund 9,452,000 Construction Fund - 1990 20,850,000 Bond 8 Interest Fund - 1951 33,000 . TOTAL $ 40,008,000 (f) DISTRICT 6 Roll call vote approving 1990-91 fiscal year budget in the following amounts: Operating Fund - $ 7,768,000 Capital Facilities Fund 10,260,000 ,'WWI Construction Fund - 1990 15,500,000 TOTAL $ 33,528,000 [ITEM (14) (b) (4) CONTINUED ON PAGE 10] -9- 7/11/90 (14) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 9) .. (b) (4) (g) DISTRICT 7 Ro c=vote approving 1990-91 fiscal year budget in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 13,218,000 Capital Facilities Fund 28,253,000 Construction Fund - 1990 25,603,000 Bond 9 Interest Fund - 1962 296,000 TOTAL $ 67,370,000 (h) DISTRICT 11 Ro�ea T vote approving 1990-91 fiscal year budget in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 11,175,000 Capital Facilities Fund 13,709,000 Construction Fund - 1990 26,120,000 Bond 6 Interest Fund - 1958 37,000 TOTAL $ 51,041,000 (1) DISTRICT 13 Ro ca vote approving 1990-91 fiscal year budget in the following amounts: Operating Fund S 917,000 Capital Facilities Fund 12,414,000 TOTAL $ 13,331.000 (j ) DISTRICT 14 Ro ca vote approving 1990-91 fiscal year budget in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 1,233,000 Capital Facilities Fund 13,483,000 TOTAL $ 14,716,000 (11 DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6 7 9 11 (ONLY) Consl�eraE of n o e o owing resolutions establishing the annual Gann appropriations limit for fiscal year 1990-91 for each District in accordance with the provisions of Division 9 of Title 1 of the California Government Code. See page _ °U" DISTRICT RESO. NO. LIMITATION 1 90-76-1 : 2,273,000 2 90-77-2 8,539,000 3 90-78-3 11,3P4,000 5 90-79-5 2,174,000 6 90-80-6 1,362,000 7 90-81-7 3, 317,000 11 90-82-11 2,339,000 13 --- Not Applicable 14 --- Not Applicable -10- 7/11/90 ( 15) DISTRICTS 1,2, 3 ,5,E 7 6 11 ONLY Consi eration of a ollowing resolutions authorizing the District to reimburse its capital fund reserves from the proceeds of approved indebtedness issues, for the expenditure of funds for the design and construction of any capital facilities projects identified in the 1989 Master Plan of Facilities: See page "v" District No. Resolution No. 1 90-90-1 2 90-91-2 3 90-92-3 5 90-93-5 6 90-94-6 7 90-95-7 11 90-96-11 (16) ALL DISTRICTS Closed Session: During the course of con uct ng the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards, the Chairman may convene the Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956 . 9 or 54957 .6 . Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employee compensation; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as final actions are taken by the Directors on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary (b) Reconvene in regular session (c) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session. (17 ) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 18) DISTRICT 1 Ot— eFi uussiness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (19 ) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn -11- 7/11/90 (20) DISTRICT 2 O hominess and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21 ) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn (22) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (23 ) DISTRICT 3 Con�tion of motion to adjourn (24) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (25) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn (26 ) DISTRICT 13 Ot— e-r�usiness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (27 ) DISTRICT 13 Consi eration of motion to adjourn (28) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of the following actions in connection with Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 2, Contract No. 5-34-2: (a) verbal report (b) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 2, Contract No. 5-34-2, authorizing an addition of $495,775.00 to the contract with Kenko, Inc. , dba McGrand & Associates, for two items of additional work. See page "W., (29 ) DISTRICT 5 Con�tion of the following actions in connection with construction of the South Coast Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-35: (a) verbal report (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file General Counsel ' s Memoradum dated June 26 , 1990 re subordination agreement with the County of Orange in connection with District' s easement rights for said project. See page "X" (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-85-5, approving an agreement with the County of Orange for subordination of District' s easement rights in connection with construction of the South Coast Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-35 . See page "Y" -12- ( 30) DISTRICT 5 7/11/90 Other and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 31 ) DISTRICT 5 ConsicFeration of motion to adjourn ( 32) DISTRICTS 6, 7 & 14 Consideration of actions relative to Supplement No. 1 to the Environmental Impact Report for Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of District NOS. 7 and 13 re Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Contract Nos. 14-1-1A and 14-1-1B, and Baker Force Mains, Contract No. 14-1-2: (a) verbal report, (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Summary Report dated July 3, 1990 re said Final EIR (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file written comments received after the public hearing on March 14, 1990. (Copies included in Final EIR) (d) Discussion (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Final Supplement No. 1 to Environmental Impact Report; and certify that said Final Supplement No. 1 to Environmental Impact Report has been completed in compliance with the State and Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) (f) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-86, certifying said Final Supplement No. 1 to Environmental Impact Report; making certain findings relating to significant environmental effects identified in the Supplement; adopting a statement of overriding considerations; and authorizing the filing of a Notice of Determination re said projects (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) (33) DISTRICT 6 Ot iher siness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 34) DISTRICT 6 Con�tion of motion to adjourn ( 35) DISTRICT 7 0 or uussiness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 36) DISTRICT 7 ConsiFeration of motion to adjol+rn (37) DISTRICT 14 `..n' o er usiness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (38) DISTRICT 14 Con�F—aEion of motion to adjourn -13- MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts P.O, Box 8127.10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County, California Fountain Volley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 -� JOINT BOARDS Meeting Date July 11, 1990 at 7:30 p.m. The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting. ALL DISTRICTS 7 and 8: ELECTION OF JOINT CHAIRMAN AND VICE JOINT CHAIRMAN. As provided in the Joint Boards' Rules of Procedures, nominations for Joint Chairman were made at the regular June meeting and the election takes place at the July regular meeting. Joint Chairman A. B. "Buck' Catlin has been nominated for another term as Joint Chairman. Enclosed with the supporting agenda material is a statement submitted by Joint Chairman nominee Catlin. Nominations and election of the Vice Joint Chairman will be conducted immediately following the election of the Joint Chairman. For the Directors information, we have included below an excerpt from the current Rules of Procedures for meetings relative to the election of the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. 'Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. RA Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization shall be elected by a majority vote of the Districts at the regular meeting in July of each year. The nominations for Joint Chairman shall be made at the regular Boar: meeting in June each year. . . . "The nominations for Vice , oint Chairman shall be made at the regular Board meeting in July each year and shall be made immediately following the election of the Joint Chairman. July 11, 1990 , "The Chairman and Vice Chairman shall serve at the pleasure of a majority of the Districts. In the event the office of Chairman becomes vacant due to resignation or retirement of the incumbent prior to the expiration of the regular term, the Vice Chairman shall automatically succeed to the office of the Chairman and shall continue to serve through the remainder of the regular term unless sooner removed by action of a majority of the Districts. In the event the office of Vice Chairman becomes vacant prior to the expiration of the regular term, nominations and the election of a Director to serve in that capacity shall be conducted at the next regular Board meeting. The person so elected shall serve the balance of the regularly-scheduled term unless sooner removed as a result of action by a majority of the Districts." 11(a) AUTHORIZING APPLICATIONS FOR FEDERAL GRANTS/LOANS FOR 1990-91 JOINT WORKS IMPROVEMENTS AND ADDITIONS. The routine annual action appearing in the agenda adopts resolutions for each of the Districts authorizing execution and filing of all documents necessary for state and federal construction grant and/or loan applications for 1990-91. 11(b) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 6 TO PREPURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE SYSTEM AND PUMPS FOR OCEAN OUTFALL BOOSTER STATION "C" AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. J-15A. In September 1986 General Electric Company was awarded a contract to provide five pumps, drive shafts and variable frequency drive systems, complete with all auxiliary equipment, control panels and accessories required for the new 480 million gallon per day Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant 2. Change Order No. 6 provides for a deduction of $72,000.00 from the contract with General Electric Company for one item of credited work on this job. The credit is for the deletion of field efficiency testing for the five pumps, motors and variable speed drives, required as part of the original specifications to compare the contractor's guaranteed system efficiency to the actual performance. It was determined that a calculation of efficiency based on factory testing of power usage versus flow output should be used in lieu of actual field testing, which resulted in a credit to the Districts of $72,000.00. This adjustment is intended to compensate the Districts for any added electrical costs anticipated over the life of the equipment resulting from the difference between design and actual performance efficiency ratings. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 6 for a deduction of $72,000.00 from the contract with General Electric Company. There is no time extension associated with this change order. 11(c) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 30 TO HEADWORKS NO. 2 AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-20: AND DEMOLITION OF DIGESTERS NOS. 1. 2 AND 4: REPLACEMENT OF BOILER: PIPING CLEANOUTS: AND GRADING AND PAVING AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P1-31: AND ACCEPTANCE OF JOB AS COMPLETE.. Job No. P1-20, Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1 and Job No. P1-31, Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts; and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, includes the construction of a -2- July 11, 1990 new 140 million gallon per day influent pumping plant and preliminary treatment facilities at a cost of $33.9 million. The job is now complete. (1) Change Order No. 30 Change Order No. 30 covers 15 miscellaneous modifications for a net deduction of $35,426.58 from the contract. Item 1, in the amount of $602.00, provides for the addition of plexiglass cover plates at the existing Headworks No. 1. The plates were required to control odors in this area but were not shown on the contract plans. Item 2, in the amount of $1,397.00, is for extra work which took place at the existing influent channel . Additional sawcutting was required because the thickness of the existing influent channel wall was shown on the record drawings to be three inches less than the actual thickness of the wall . Item 3, in the amount of $4,036.00, provides for the repair of an undisclosed 6-inch plant water line that was damaged during asphalt removal operations adjacent to the existing headworks facility chlorine area. Also included in this item are the costs for locating and protecting several abandoned underground utilities that were not shown on the contract plans. Item 4, in the amount of $1,108.00, provides for electrical modifications at the drainage lift station which were needed to accommodate an increased pumping capacity at the station. Item 5, for $958.00, provides for piping modifications at the Chlorine Building and the costs for investigating a failure in the bubbler system in the Barscreen Building that was determined not to be the contractor's responsibility. Item 6, in the amount of $4,654.00, is for modifications to the existing one-ton chlorine cylinder facility. The modifications were required because of a change in the pavement elevations in the area. Item 7, at a cost of $3,035.00, is for added work at the existing headworks discharge channel and wet well to allow draining the grit chamber and barscreen influent channel so contract-specified work could proceed. Item 8, in the amount of $3,216.00, provides for the installation of a temporary weir at the existing grit chambers at Headworks No. 1 to prevent a back-up of flow in the new 72-inch primary effluent line and to allow the contractor to perform the specified polyurethane coating of concrete interior surfaces at the grit chamber. Item 9, in the amount of $3,316.00, provides for extra work for the rerouting of the specified drain line around an undisclosed, abandoned underground meter vault. Item 10, in the amount of $4,873.00, includes extra costs for locating, protecting and supporting undisclosed, live utilities at the drainage lift station. Item 11, in the amount of $17,981.00, provides for modifications to the influent pump circuits. ThP modifications included additional pressure switches which were not shown on the contract drawings to be added to the bubbler panels and investigation of excessive vibration at the influent pumps. Item 12 is the reduction of specified polyurethane coating applications at the existing Headworks v area and at the new Sunflower screw pumps which resulted in a credit of $8,500.00. -3- July 11, 1990 Item 13, in the amount of $5,000.00, provides for circuit breaker modifications that were required for optimum operation of the influent pumps. Item 14, in the amount of $4,061.00, provides for modifications to the hot water piping at Digesters 5 and 6 which were needed to properly integrate the increased pressure connections to and from the new P1-31 boiler system. The revisions were not shown on the contract plans. Item 15 is the deletion of paving from the area south of the existing Operations Control Center and around the recently demolished Digesters 1, 2 and 4. As this project progressed,. it was determined that paving should not be placed in this area due to the scheduling and eventual disruption of new construction projects in these areas. This item resulted in a credit of $77,216.00. The above-described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items are for replaced work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 30 for a net deduction of $35,426.58 from the contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. There is no time extension associated with this change order. (2) Acceptance of Contract as Complete Kiewit Pacific Co. has fulfilled all contractual obligations within the specified and extended time. Therefore, staff recommends adoption of the resolution attached to the agenda material , authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the Final Closeout Agreement and filing of the Notice of Completion as required. The final project cost is $33,890,078.03. 11(d) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 TO PRIMARY CLARIFIERS NOS. 6-15 AND RELATED FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-33. Job No. P1-33, Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, includes the construction of a new 60 mgd primary treatment facility and a new large diameter effluent piping network at a cost of $39.7 million, the largest single project ever awarded by the Districts. Change Order No. 3 adds $e21,667.00 to the contract for two items of additional work. Item 1, for $17,780.00, provides for modifications to the embedded stop plate guides in the Waste Side Stream Pump Station and the splitter box trough cover supports to allow for proper operation of the equipment. Item 2, in the amount of $3,887.00, provides for the addition of fencing and gate relocation at the West Perimeter Road to improve plant security. The above-described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items are for replaced work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 3 for an addition of $21,667.00 to the contract with Gust K. Newberg Construction Co. There is no time extension associated with this change order. -4- July 11, 1990 11(e): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO GAS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 JOB NO. P1-34-1. Job No. P1-34-1, Gas Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, includes the construction of a new city water pump station, a new power building, and a new gas compressor building at a cost of $13.1 million. The contract also includes supplying and installing three reciprocating compressors at Plant No. 1, and supplying three reciprocating compressors at Plant No. 2 for future installation by others. Change Order No. 1 adds four items of work and $52,748.00 to the contract. Item 1, in the amount of $2,026.00, provides for the removal of a large, undisclosed tree trunk, buried below grade, that interfered with the foundation construction at the City Water Pump Station. Item 2, in the amount of $2,049.00, is for replacing existing pipe supports, shown on the plans to support proposed new sludge piping in Tunnel No. B. with larger ones. Item 3, in the amount of $3,973.00, is the addition of a new ductbank and conduits to the Resource Management Center (Old Personnel Building) . The contract drawings showed the proposed conductors be routed into the Resource Management Center through existing conduits which are no longer available. Item 4, in the amount of $44,700.00, is the addition of a temporary high pressure digester gas pipe to keep the existing headworks pump engines operating. The contract requires the existing gas supply to the engines to be removed and the temporary line is required to supply fuel to the engines on an interim basis. The above described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items are for replacement work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 for an addition of $52,748.00 to the Contract with Ziebarth & Alper. There is no time extension associated with this change order. 11(f) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 TO SLUDGE HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-34-2. This $19.4 million project includes the construction of a new sludge handling and truck loading facility, a new Plant Water Pump Station and power distribution building, the construction of a new 12 KV Service Center and minor improvements to existing sludge handling facilities. Change Order No. 3 adds eight items of work and $32,443.52 to the contract. Item 1, in the amount of $1,144.08, provides for the installation of an additional hose valve, hose rack and associated plant water piping that was omitted from the plans at the new tarpaulin platform and existing tunnel No. 12. Item 2, in the amount of $2,954.13, provides for the application of corrosion protective material on the exterior surface of the mortar-coated steel Orange County Water District line in new junction box 'B". Item 3, in the amount of $1,265.78, provides for the installation of a 2-inch electrical conduit that will be extended in the future by the P1-33 contractor to furnish a means of routing a fire alarm signal from the 12 KV Service Center. Item 4, in the amount of $5,072.50, provides for the installation of stainless steel pipe closure plates in new junction box "C" in lieu of the -5- July 11, 1990 coated black steel plates specified on the plans. Stainless steel was utilized because of its ability to withstand the corrosive atmosphere anticipated in new junction box "C" Item 5, in the amount of $7,345.00, provides for the realignment of the new 12 KV SCE (Edison) ductbank, in the vicinity of the southwest entrance, to eliminate a conflict with an underground concrete pipeline not shown on the plans. Item 6, in the amount of $9,863.84, provides for the installation of additional 2-inch conduits and 4/0 cable for the grounding of SCE switchgear and site structures. This additional grounding was not included in the original SCE drawings for the new 12 KV service entry but was required by SCE after the contract was awarded. Item 7, in the amount of $4,393.05, provides for the removal and disposal of an undisclosed, abandoned electrical ductbank that was in conflict with new construction at the Plant Water Pump Station. Item 8, in the amount of $405.14, provides for the increase of pipe sizes for scrubber recirculation system at the Chlorine Booster Pump Station to overcome head losses not anticipated in design. The above described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items are for replacement work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 3 for an addition of $32,433.52 to the Contract with Advanco Constructors. There is no time extension associated with this change order. 11(g) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 9 TO MISCELLANEOUS MODIFICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-37. The plans and specifications for this project, approved by the Directors in September 1988, include 38 items of non-related rehabilitation and correctional work. Larger items of work include replacement of the domes on Digesters "A" and "B", replacement of two influent pumps at Headworks "C", the installation of prepurchased barscreens at Headworks "C", replacement of grit augers, screening conveyors, chlorine system piping and waste activated sludge pumps, new primary influent flow meters, sheds for electric cart storage and bypass waste activated sludge piping. Change Order No. 9 provides for seven items of added work and adds $115,453.00 to the contract. Item 1, in the amount of $22,949.00, provides for the relocation of all wall-mounted process piping, utilities and supports along the north side of Headworks "C" and the barscreen room to clear the area for construction of the new Conveyor Building. Existing piping was not shown on the plans. Item 2, in the amount of $23,000.00, provides for the installation of dome to wall anchors at Digesters "A" and "B" for additional seismic restraint based on new standards. Item 3, in the amount of $4,250.00, provides for the installation of a carbon filter unit in the air conditioning system at the new Raw Sewage Power Building. The carbon filter unit was shown in general on the plans but not Included in the detailed specifications. Item 4, in the amount of $4,244.00, provides for the modification of the drive section for the screenings conveyor at the new Conveyor Building to provide additional clearance between the conveyor belt and drive framework. The modification will eliminate larger items from hanging up on the conveyor drive. -6- July 11, 1990 Item 5, in the amount of $2,188.00, provides for the placement of additional non-skid treatment on the floor of the "A" and "B" Digester control room roof for employee safety. The area requiring additional treatment was not called out on the plans. Item 6, in the amount of $5,810.00, provides for the rerouting of the new electrical feeders to new raw sewage pumps Nos. 2 and 4 in Headworks "C" to eliminate interferences with existing utilities and process piping. Item 7, in the amount of $53,012.00, provides for the installation of two additional 800-amp circuit breakers in the electrical feeders to new raw sewage pump variable frequency drive units. Original plans provided for all units to be fed by a single 800-amp breaker. The above described changes, except for Item 2, are considered by staff to be a design change which would have been included in the original design if known prior to completion of the specifications. A portion of Item 2 will be reimbursed. No other rework was required. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 9 adding $115,453.00 to the contract. No time extension is associated with this change order. 11(h) : RATIFY STAFF ACTION AND ISSUANCE OF PURCHASE ORDER FOR EMERGENCY MODIFICATIONS TO CITY WATER LINES SERVING THE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING. LABORATORY AND MAINTENANCE/WAREHOUSE COMPLEX AT PLANT NO. 1. The Districts' have competed installation of a new 10-inch city water service for the Administration, Laboratory, Maintenance/Warehouse complex at Plant No. 1, bordered by the new Main Entrance, Ellis Avenue on the north, the North Perimeter Road on the south and the westerly property line. In order to obtain this new city water service, the Districts were required to meet certain isolation criteria established by the City ,of Fountain Valley and the State Department of Health for protection of the city water supply from possible contamination. These requirements including locating, isolating and cutting all existing water connections crossing the North Perimeter Road into the treatment plant complex. Some of this work was completed under Job No. J-20, but the City of Fountain Valley field inspectors required additional verification work, on an urgency basis The additional work included trenching around the perimeter of the existing Ellis Avenue city water service air gap tanks, adjacent to the old entrance, to verify the existence or absence of any additional city water service lines; abandonment of the existing 4-inch air gap city water service serving the Administration Building, Laboratory and Maintenance/Warehouse complex; and abandonment of all existing city water lines crossing the North Perimeter Road. Upon direction by the City of Fountain Valley, staff proceeded irmediately to engage the services of an onsite contractor, Dorado Enterprises, Inc., to complete the city and state requirements in order that the new 10-inch city water service could be reactivated as soon as possible. All work was performed on a time and material basis in accordance with the Districts' General Provisions. (Included in this work is $2,726.66 credited to the Districts for work not performed by the J-20 contractor.) -7- July 11, 1990 The requested action is to ratify staff action in approving issuance of a purchase order to Dorado Enterprises, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $39,500.00 to accomplish said work on an emergency basis. 11(i) : AMENDING ACTION AUTHORIZING PURCHASE ORDER WITH CARLETON ENGINEERS FOR AIR QUALITY CONSULTING SERVICES. In May the Directors authorized staff to issue a purchase order to F. E. Carleton Engineers in an amount not to exceed $50,000.00 for professional consulting services for a two-year period on an as-needed basis. Mr. Carleton assists the Districts in obtaining permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as assisting in the review of proposed changes to rules and regulations of the SCAQMD. In requesting the authorization in May, staff inadvertently used a 1988 billing rate of $95.00 per hour. Carleton Engineers current billing rate is $115.00 per hour. Staff is therefore requesting that the Boards' action on May 9, 1990 be amended to correct the hourly rate from $95.00 to $115.00, with no increase in maximum authorized amount of $50,000.00 for services. 11(j) : AMENDING AUTHORIZATION FOR PARTICIPATION IN PEEP RE TESTING IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE AIR TOXICS HOT SPOTS ACT--AB 2588. In 1987, the California State Legislature enacted Assembly Bill 2588, the "Air Toxics Hot Spots Act" (Act) . This Act requires that major stationary sources of criteria air pollutants be measured for the presence of toxic air pollutants, as identified by the California Air Resources Board (CARB), that are used, produced or released at a major stationary source facility. The Districts' two wastewater treatment facilities are subject to this requirement. AB 2588, requires the Districts, as a minimum, to test and assess air emissions from our sewage treatment plants. If the testing results are above certain criteria, then computer modeling and risk assessment calculations will also be required. We anticipate that modeling and risk assessment calculatiops may be required but staff will seek authorization on this work at a later date. The Boards have previously authorized staff to hire a consultant, Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., to prepare the inventory and testing plans (Phase I) required under the Act for each treatment plant. The Boards have also authorized the Districts' participation in the Pooled Emissions Estimation Plan (PEEP) for wastewater treatment plants to conduct a portion of the field testing for emissions from processes common to most plants in a state-wide cooperative joint effort to save duplicated work and save money. PEEP is a joint powers group of several publicly owned treatment works (POTWs). The Phase I inventory plans were submitted to the South Coast Air Quality Management Di-trict (SCAQMD) and partial approval of the plans has been obtained from SCAQMD. The PEEP protocols have ueen approved, but protocol approval by SCAQMD fc;• additional required Phase II testing is still pending. Phase II of the plan consists of the testing conducted under the PEEP cooperative state-wide study as well as additional site-specific testing -8- July 11, 1990 required at the Districts' facilities that is outside the scope of PEEP. The PEEP work has been divided into three rounds of testing. The site-specific portion of the testing has not been conducted because protocols have not yet been approved by SCAQMD. The first two rounds of PEEP testing have been completed, and the third is scheduled to begin in late July of this year. When these tests begin, the Districts can realize a significant cost savings by having the PEEP contractor, J. M. Montgomery Engineers, conduct the additional required non-PEEP testing (for the Districts' site-specific facilities) along with the scheduled PEEP testing and laboratory analyses. We can, in other words, "piggy-back" the two sets of testing for a considerable cost savings. The initial cost estimate for the Districts to separately conduct testing of all processes required by AB 2588 was $1,070,000 to $1,120,000 excluding consultant support services. It now appears that if the Districts can have PEEP also conduct our site-specific testing (originally estimated to cost between $200,000 and $250,000), and the total cost will be less than $750,000 because of the savings realized by joining PEEP and by conducting the PEEP and non-PEEP testing simultaneously. In December the Boards authorized the Districts' participation in PEEP. The Districts' share of the PEEP work was estimated to be $500,000 at-that time. Until SCAQMD approves the inventory plans, the site-specific remaining cost of the Phase II sampling and analysis cannot be fully defined or accurately estimated. However, staff believes that the overall cost with the addition of our required site-specific "piggy-back' testing will be less than $250,000. Staff is therefore requesting authorization to conduct the additional testing under the auspices of PEEP and to increase the previously authorized limit for air toxics testing under PEEP from $500,000 to $750,000 for the estimated cost of the additional Districts' site-specific tests. This can be accomplished under the provisions of the existing PEEP joint powers agreement. 11(k) : AUTHORIZING PAYMENT OF SCAOMD FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1990-91. The California Clean Air Act authorizes the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) to assess and collect fees from public agencies for permit evaluation, annual operation permits, emissions, and other applicable fees. Recently adopted rules and regulations will significantly increase most of the fees paid by the Districts in comparison to previous years. The total estimated fees payable in the fiscal year 1990-91 are as follows: Fee Estimated Amount Annual Emissions Fees $ 94,000 Permit Evaluation Fers 28,000 Annual Permit Operating Fees 45,000 Hot Spots, Toxics and Precursors Fees 18,000 Source Test Analyses 60,000 Miscellaneous Other Fees 55,000 Total : $300,000 -9- July 11, 1990 Staff is requesting authorization to issue a blanket purchase order to SCAQMD, and to pay all applicable fees for the 1990-91 fiscal year in compliance with existing rules and regulations. 11(1) and (m) : AUTHORIZING GENERAL COUNSEL TO DEFEND DISTRICTS' INTERESTS RE STOP NOTICE PROCEEDINGS CONCERNING DISTRICTS' CONTRACTOR ON JOB NO. J-20. Attached to the supporting agenda material are memoranda from the General Counsel describing labor and materials non-payment litigation naming the Districts in suits brought by Acme Rents Inc., and the Carpenters Southern California Administrative Corporation for work performed for J. R. Roberts, Districts' contractor on Job No. J-20; and recommending that he be authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts, as required. DISTRICT 2 11(n) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDERS NOS. 2 AND 3 TO NORTH BRANCH OF ROLLINGS HILLS DRIVE SUBTRUNK SEWER (AND CITY OF BREA SEWER) . CONTRACT NO. 2-11-3: AND ACCEPTANCE OF JOB AS COMPLETE. This project is the construction of a trunk sewer main and appurtenances in the County of Orange Craig Regional Park, from the District's Rolling Hills Drive Subtrunk Sewer in the City of Fullerton to State College Boulevard in the City of Brea. The project is a joint project with the City of Brea. The contract was awarded to Colich & Sons (JV) of Gardena in August of 1989. The contract is now complete. (1) Change Order No. 2 Change Order No. 2, in the amount of $87,590.00, consists of six items. Item 1, in the amount of $16,526.00 and five calendar days, is for additional asphalt paving and base material for a parking area within Craig Park required because of unstable subbase. Item 2, in the amount $19,823.00 and 30 calendar days, is for the removal and replacement of unsuitable backfill material for the trench of the new sewer line. Item 3, in the amount of $16,001.00 and 10 calendar days, is for extra work due to a conflict with an existing concrete encased sewer line. Item 4, in the amount of $7,506.00 and 10 calendar days, is for added work to connect an undisclosed sewer lateral on the City of Brea's portion of the contract. The City will reimburse the Districts for this cost. Item 5, is a time extension of 60 days for delays caused by the County Parks Department and Orange County Environmental Management Agency (EMA) . Item 6, in the amount of $27,734.M and 30 calendar days, is for additional paving at various locations within the park which was directed to be accomplished by the County EMA. -10- July 11, 1990 Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 3 to the contract in the amount of $87,590.00, and adding 145 calendar days for completion of the job. (2) Change Order No. 3 Change Order No. 3 is a net deduction of $4,442.00 for adjustment of engineer's estimated quantities with actual for said project. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 3 to the contract for a net deduction of $4,442.00. (3) Acceptance of Contract as Complete Colich and Sons (JV) has fulfilled all contractual obligations within the specified and extended time. Therefore, staff recommends adoption of the resolution attached to the agenda material, authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the Final Closeout Agreement and filing of the Notice of Completion as required. The final project cost is $798,549.00. DISTRICT 7 11(o) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO ABANDONMENT OF LANE ROAD PUMP STATION. CONTRACT NO. 7-11-1, AND ABANDONMENT OF CASTLEROCK AND DOW AVENUE PUMP STATIONS AND MODIFICATIONS TO MACARTHUR PUMP STATION. CONTRACT NO. 7-11-3. Contract No. 7-11-1. Abandonment of Lane Road Pump Station, and Contract No. 7-11-3, Abandonment of Castlerock and Dow Avenue Pump Stations and Modifications to MacArthur Pump Station, in the total amount of $1.3 million, are located within the County and City of Orange, City of Tustin and the City of Newport Beach. In addition to abandoning the pump stations (now complete) , the MacArthur Pump Station is being modernized by the installation of new pumps and piping. Change Order No. 1, in the amount of $27,913.00, adds two items of work and six calendar days to the 7-11-3 contract. Item 1, in the amount of $6,659.00, is to change the construction of the proposed new sewer and manholes due to an elevation conflict between the proposed and existing sewer line. Item 2, in the amount of $21,254.00, is for extra work as a result of encountering uncompacted cobbles used in an adjacent line which caused caving of the excavation. The above-described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items are for replaced work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 adding $27,913.00 and a time extension of six calendar days to the contract with .Colich and Sons (JV) . 11(p) : APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CAMPUS RELIEF SEWER. CONTRACT NO. 7-13. �.d Last July, the Directors approved a professional services agreement with Church Engineering for the preparation of plans and specifications for the -11- July 11, 1990 Campus Relief Sewer, Contract No. 7-13. This project, identified in the 1983 Master Plan and reaffirmed in the 1989 Master Plan, is the construction of a relief sewer in Campus Drive from the Von Karman Trunk Sewer easterly through as Jamboree Boulevard. The project will serve a relatively large redevelopment of areas easterly of Jamboree Boulevard both north and south of Campus Drive. Church has completed the plans and specifications and staff is requesting that they be approved and that the General Manager be authorized to establish the bid date. The engineer's estimate for the Campus Relief Sewer is $850,000.00 11(q) : APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH COUNTY OF ORANGE FOR ADJUSTING MANHOLES AND CLEAN-OUTS IN CONJUNCTION WITH COUNTY'S 1989-90 ROAD RESURFACING PROJECT. In 1986 the Directors approved an agreement with the County of Orange which provided for adjustment of manhole covers on District sewers in conjunction with the County's road resurfacing program in the unincorporated areas within District 7. That agreement, which was amended as additional County projects went to contract, included the County's projects for 1985-86 and 1986-87. Subsequent agreements with the County were approved for the 1987-88 and 1988-89 resurfacing programs. A new agreement has been proposed by the County to cover work under contracts authorized in the 1989-90 fiscal year. The agreement provides for the adjustment of approximately 302 manholes and three clean-outs at the County contractor's actual cost plus 10% for inspection and administrative costs, with a maximum cost of $220 per manhole and a minimum cost of $155; and with a maximum cost of $176 per clean-out and a a minimum cost of $125. The previous agreements have been very satisfactory from the District's standpoint. It eliminates duplication of contracting efforts and provides a very favorable cost arrangement. The estimated cost is $66,968.00 which the Districts' must deposit with the County. Staff recommends approval of the 1989-90 manholes and clean-outs adjustment agreement with the County of Orange Environmental Management Agency. DISTRICT 11 11(r) : AUTHORIZING GENERAL COUNSEL TO DEFEND DISTRICT'S INTERESTS RE JOHN L. SMITH V. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND "DOE SANITARY DISTRICT". ET AL. Attached to the supporting agenda material is a memorandum from the General Counsel describing the above proceeding and recommending that he be authorized to appear and defend the interests of the District, as required. ALL DISTRICTS 13: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CONSERVATION. RECLAMATION AND REII,E COMMITTEE. The Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee met on June 28, 1990. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on its discussions and recommendations for consideration by the Boards. -12- • July 11, 1990 14: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING. The Executive Committee met on June 27, 1990. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on its deliberations and recommendations for consideration by the Boards. DISTRICTS 1. 2. 3. 5. 6. 7 AND 11 15: AUTHORIZING REIMBURSEMENT OF FUNDS ADVANCED FROM RESERVES BY DISTRICTS FOR CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECTS FROM PROCEEDS OF INDEBTEDNESS ISSUES. In July 1989, as part of the Districts' 30-year wastewater management plan of action, the Boards approved the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, including a Financial Plan. With respect to funding of capital facilities, the adopted plan provides that they will be financed, in part, by proceeds from indebtedness issues. Districts 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 are in the process of securing an underwriter and bond counsel for the first of such issues (see separate discussion in Executive Committee Report for meeting of June 27, 1990, included with this agenda package for Directors under Item 14) but the first sale is not expected to take place until late 1990 or early 1991. Meanwhile, capital projects are being funded from capital reserves of the various Districts. Staff and General Counsel are recommending that the Boards adopt the resolution attached to the supporting agenda material authorizing the reimbursement of funds advanced from reserves by the Districts for capital facilities projects from proceeds of indebtedness issues, at the option of the respective Boards. The advantage of this action is that it will allow the Districts to potentially restore the portion of their capital reserve funds that are allowed to earn investment interest without being subject to the arbitrage limits. ALL DISTRICTS 16: AGENDA FOR CLOSED SESSION. From time to time it is necessary for the Boards to convene in closed session to consider purchase and sale of real property, potential or pending litigation, personnel matters or other matters which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act. In order to avoid a situation where a closed session is needed but does not appear on the agenda, this standing item is placed on the agenda each month providing for a closed session at the regular meeting, if deemed necessary by the Boards. DISTRICT 5 28: APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO IMPROVEMENTS TO BAYSIDE DRIVE TRUNK SEWER, PHASE 2. CONTRACT NO. 5-34-2. In January 1990, the Directors awarded Improvements to Bayside Drive e . Trunk Sewer, Phase 2, Contract No. 5-34-2, to Kenko Inc. in the amount of os $1,959,690.00. This contract was to include construction of approximately 6,500 feet of 36-inch diameter gravity sewer pipe along three separate deteriorated -13- July 11, 1990 sections of the Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer (originally installed in 1936) in Bayside Drive from Pacific Coast Highway to Marguerite. Change Order No. 1 adds $495,775.00. (Of this amount, $106,320.00 is for work previously deleted from Contract No. 5-34-1 and added to Contract No. 5-34-2, $2820355.00 is for work to be reimbursed by Mobil Oil Co., and $107,100.00 is for relocating City of Newport Beach water lines.) Prior to the award of Contract No. 5-34-2, the Board had approved a cooperative agreement with the City of Newport Beach to include Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 1, Contract No. 5-34-1, in the City's road improvement project at the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway and Bayside Drive. District Contract No. 5-34-1 included sewer work within the intersection of Bayside Drive and Pacific Coast Highway and was bid as part of the City of Newport Beach's project for the improvement of Pacific Coast Highway in that vicinity. However, only a small portion of the $142,000.00 Contract No. 5-34-1 work was completed under the City contract. The major portion of the work, in the amount of $106,320.00, was deleted when the City discovered subsurface gasoline contamination. At about the time the City indicated they would not proceed with the 5-34-1 sewer construction and asked the District to take back the project, the District awarded Contract No. 5-34-2 to Kenko Inc. This project started where Contract No. 5-34-1 left off, in Bayside Drive on the south side of PCH. Concurrently, Mobil Oil Co., the operators of a service station on the southeast corner of the Bayside Drive/PCH intersection, and staff met regarding the subsurface gasoline contamination. The original discussions with Mobil were directed towards installation of the sewer by Mobil . However, Mobil 's costs were substantially higher than the Districts' staff felt was reasonable and staff had concerns about Mobil 's ability to install a sanitary sewer pipe. Staff believed that tunneling under the intersection would be cost effective and certainly less disruptive to traffic. Accordingly, staff and Mobil developed a plan whereby the District would install a tunnel under the intersection and complete the Contract No. 5-34-1 work deleted by the City of Newport Beach from their highway improvement job, and Mobil would reimburse the District. In February the Board approved an agreement with Mobil wherein the District would incorporate the necessary Contract No. 5-34-1 work into Contract No. 5-34-2 by change order and Mobil would reimburse the District for all cost increases above the originally bid sewer work before gasoline contamination was discovered, for both Contracts Nos. 5-34-1 and 5-34-2. Change Order No. 1 to Contract No. 5-34-2 includes two items. The first item is the construction of the Contract No. 5-34-1 sewer under the intersection of PCH and Bayside Drive and cost increases for Contract No. 5-34-2, as discussed above. Item 1, in the amount of $388,675.00, includes the construction of a tunnel under PCH, manholes, traffic control , cost increases associated with vapor recovery, dewatering of contaminated water, training costs, abandonment of an old sewer line, and other related costs previously included within Contract No. 5-34-1 and added as a result of the gasoline contaminated subsoil condition. However, costs are not yet final . Remaining charges include currently unknown amounts for added traffic control and slurry work, estimated at about $25,000.00. \/ 14- July 11, 1990 District 5 will not incur any additional costs over and above the $106,320.00 deleted from Contract No. 5-34-1 and the bid prices for Contract No. 5-34-2. Any such costs will be reimbursed by Mobil . Because the change order is quite large in relation to the total contract, staff is requesting interim approval of this item in the amount of $388,675.00 to allow progress payments to be made to the contractor for completed work and to allow the District to bill Mobil Oil for costs incurred to date. Any additional costs will be submitted separately to the Board for subsequent change order approval at a later date, when they are finalized. Item No. 2, in the amount of $107,100.00, includes costs for the relocation of two City of Newport Beach water lines found in the intersection of Jamboree Boulevard and Bayside Drive. The waterlines/locations were not known by City staff at the time the contract was approved. Apparently they are quite old. Staff, and the project designers, prepared plans for the relocation and secured approval from City staff. Because the work was extensive and specialized, it was submitted for bid by several subcontractors by staff and Kenko; and the subcontract work was awarded to S. A. Healy, the low bidder, as shown below: Irvine Pipeline: $148,410.00 Dorado Enterprises: 136,850.00 S. A. Healy: 107,100.00 Additional costs may be required for premium overtime pay should portions of the work be required at night. Further, potholing costs (about $20,000.00) are not included. Time extensions will also be required because of the delay incurred for the design of the relocation and the ordering of special fittings (a six-week lead time) . Any additional costs will be submitted separately to the Board for subsequent change order approval at a later date, when they are finalized. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 to the contract with Kenko Inc. in the total amount of $495,775.00 in order to keep the project timely and to allow interim billings for cost recovery. 29: APPROVING SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT WITH COUNTY OF ORANGE RE PROPERTY RIGHTS-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF THE SOUTH COAST TRUNK SEWER. CONTRACT NO. 5-35. Attached to the supporting agenda material is a memorandum from the General Counsel recommending approval of a subordination agreement with the County of Orange in connection with property rights-of-way/easements pertaining to construction of the South Coast Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-35. DISTRICTS 6. 7 AND 14 32: ACTIONS RE FINAL SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR PROPOSED FORMATION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14 AND PROPOSED REORGANIZATION NO. 79 INVOLVING REORGANIZATION OF DISTRICTS NOS. 7 AND 13 RE BAKER-GISLER INTERCEPTOR. CONTRACTS NOS. 14-1-1A AND 14-1-1B, AND BAKER FORCE MAINS, CONTRACT NO. 14-1-2. At the February Board meeting, the Directors received the Draft Supplement No. 1 to Environmental Impact Report for Proposed Formation of County -15- July 11, 1990 Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13 re Baker-Gisler Interceptor and Baker Force Mains (Draft EIR) . At the March Board meeting the Boards conducted a public hearing on the Draft EIR. Following the hearing, the Boards directed the staff and consultants to address the written comments received at the meeting and during the public comment period that ran through March 20, and to prepare a Final EIR to be considered by the Boards. The environmental consultant, Ultrasystems, Inc., has prepared the Final EIR. It includes copies of all of the public commentary and the responses to the comments. Enclosed with the agenda material for Directors is a copy of the Final EIR and a Staff Summary. As noted in the Staff Summary, two property owners object to the proposed alignment of Contract No. 14-1-1A. At the Board meeting staff will review the Final EIR. The proposed actions on the agenda are to comply with CEgA requirements. If any Director desires an additional copy of the previously mailed Draft EIR, please contact Jean Tappan at (714) 962-2411, extension 311. If there are any questions, please contact Thomas M. Dawes, Director of Engineering, at the same telephone number. -16- Rt: AGENDA ITEM NO. 7 •. F • a �✓ 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL 303 WEST COMMONWEALTH AVENUE . FULLERTON,CALIFORNIA 92632 C941FOFNXP Telephone: (714) 738-6311 FAX: (714) 738-6758 July 2, 1990 TO: Members of the Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County I want to thank you for your expression of confidence in nominating me for another term as your Joint Chairman. Since you will be making a decision at the July 11 Board meeting, I would like to share some of my thoughts with you on the challenges of the "2020 VISION" Wastewater Management Program. Thirty-year Wastewater Management Action Plan: Last July, after thorough study, public dialogue, workshops and hearings, the Directors adopted a fundamental long-range wastewater management plan. It was representative of the quality of work that the Districts Directors and staff have traditionally produced. To be the leader of this group has been a privilege and an honor. Awards: The respect and recognition our Districts enjoys nationally, statewide, and regionally is indicated by the significant awards that we have received at every level of government. It would be monumental also to aim for higher goals in achieving our program. We have an important tradition of excellence to sustain. Environmental Protection: And yet we have the responsibility to be cost effective in our decisions. We recognize our responsibility to consider cross-media effects. We must not spend tax payers dollars if our scientific data justifies a responsible, conservative approach. Toxic Source Control: Aggressive control of industrial waste is the key. We must maintain our high standards and have confidence in our ability to justify them with the courts. Our reputation as strict monitors of source control must be protected. Air Quality: A bright spot this past year has been our rapport with the SCAQMD. By building respect with science, we enhance our prospects of success in the 301(h) waiver renewal as well as other environmental management pursuits. lftw� A.B.CATLIN MAYOR CHRIS NORRY RICHARD C.ACKERMAN DON BANKHEAD MOLLY MCCLANAHAN MAYOR PRO-TEM COUNCILMEMBER COUNCB.MEMBER COUNCILMEMBER County Sanitation Districts 2 July 2, 1990 Water Conservation and Reclamation: An emerging committee of importance this year will be our Conservation, Reclamation, and Reuse Committee under the leadership of Director Wedaa and other knowledgable Directors who envision the Districts' rise in regional stature on these important issues. NPDES permit Renewal: Our ongoing and aggressive efforts toward education of the public and our legislators to support renewing our NPDES Ocean Discharge permit most carry equal weight. Again, cost effectiveness and scientific responsibility is the key policy of our approach. If you decide to re-elect me as your Joint Chairman, I will be honored to serve and support your policies and work with our talented Districts' staff. Sin ely, A.B. aClin Mayor ABC:mp .-RE: AGENDA ITEM N0, 13 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .1 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA IONO EW9 AVENUE Pa$0.8122 FWNTAIN VALLEY.CAUWXNIA 92228.8127 June 28, 1990 REPORT OF CONSERVATION. RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE Meeting Date: June 28, 1990 - 5.30 P.m. COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Present: Hank Wades, Chairman J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager John C. Cox Blake P. Anderson, Director of Tech. Serv. Richard B. Edgar Charles Nichols, Conservation, William D. Mahoney Reclamation and Reuse Manager Carrey J. Nelson Robert Ooten, Asst. Superintendent, Operations Iry Pickler Ed Hodges, Senior Facl. Mgr. , Maintenance Peer A. Swan Edna Wilson Absent: Others Present: Grace Winchell Tom Woodruff, General Counsel 1) Chairman's Report Chairman Wedaa opened the meeting and reported that beginning with this Committee agenda package staff will include news clippings about water conservation, water reclamation, and sludge reuse. If Director's need copies of individual articles, they may obtain them from staff. 2) Staffing Update In December 1989 upon recommendation of this Committee, the Board approved additional staff for the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Division to help carry out tha ambitious goals of the Districts' 30-year Action Plan adopted by the Directors last July. Charles Nichols, the division manager, reported on the status of staffing in his new division. In the division there are a total of four positions authorized, including manager, se,:etary, and two principal environmental specialists. Three of the four positions nave been filled while one principal environmental specialist position remains opan. During the pest two weeks, eight applicants were interviewed, and three remain as possible candidates. Report of the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee June 28, 1990 Page 2 of 4 3) Sludge Management Activities The staff reported on current sludge production and distribution. The discussion focused on current sludge management activities and the needs for diversity in types of sludge reuse and agreements. Also discussed was the Board's policy of practicing multiple, concurrent sludge disposal and reuse alternatives. A. Approving Amendment No. 3 to Agreement with Recvc. In 1988, the Boards first entered into a one-year contract with Recyc, Inc. , to remove, process, and dispose of sewage solids at a cost of $380.00 per truck load. Subsequently, the Boards amended the Recyc contract, extending its term for an additional year. Recyc presently receives about ten loads per day out of the Districts total production of 35± loads per day and makes a compost material out of it. Staff is recommending that Amendment No. 3 to the present contract with Recyc, Inc. , be approved extending the existing agreement and providing for annual extensions of the contract upon mutual agreement of terms, currently at the same price for disposal of $380.00 per truck load. The extension will provide continued disposal for the Districts' sludge while Recyc's alternative long-term site is developed. Recycle present facility is in Ontario; however, they are in the process of developing an other processing site in Riverside and, if successful, will then close the Ontario facility. If that should occur, then it may be necessary to renegotiate the contract at which time staff will return to the Boards for authorization. Recommendation, The Committee recommends that the staff and counsel be authorized to extend the Recyc composting agreement for an additional year and provide for annual agreement extensions upon mutually agreeable terms. B. Approving Agreement with L. Curti Truck and Eauipment In 1988, the Boards also entered into a contract with L. Curti Truck and Equipment to remove, process, and dispose of sewage solids at a cost of $380.00 per truck load from Plant No. 1 and $420.00 per truck load from Plant No. 2. In 1989 the contract was amended and extended for one year. Curti presently takes three loads per day and processes the sludge into a compost material. Curti presently hauls from Plant No. 1 only and is likely to only haul from Plant No. 1 over the term of any amended contract. Staff is recommending that a new negotiated agreement with L. Curti Truck and Equipment be approved for one year at the current.price for disposal of $380.00 per truck load from Plant No. 1 and $420.00 per truck load from Plant Report of the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee June 28, 1990 Page 3 of 4 No. 2. The agreement does provide for annual extensions upon mutually agreeable terms. The agreement will help provide continued, reliable disposal alternatives for the Districts' daily sludge production. Recommendation, The Committee recommends that the staff and counsel be authorized to enter into a new agreement with L. Curti Truck and Equipment for sludge removal, processing, and disposal. This agreement would be for a one year period beginning with expiration of the existing contract and provides for annual extensions upon mutually agreeable terms. Review and discussion of other sludge management activities and the suggested implementation plan was continued to the next committee meeting. 4) Water Reclamation Activities A. Status Report for Acquisition of Water Reclamation Sites. The staff discussed the potential sites in the Anaheim Forebay for construction of a water reclamation plant. The discussion focused on the site owned by Waste Water Disposal Company. This site is located in the City of Fullerton in the vicinity of State College Boulevard and Orangethorpe Avenue. Last month the Boards authorized staff and General Counsel to negotiate for acquisition of this and other sites in the Forebay area. Staff has begun the MA environmental process on behalf of the Districts in order to be prepared when action is required. The landowner is conducting a property appraisal and revising a draft purchase agreement. Staff expects the landowner to respond to the Districts in July or August. Staff reported on the Crescent Basin site located in the City of Anaheim near the intersection of Crescent Avenue and Interstate 5. The current property use is a stormwater retarding basin owned and managed by Orange County ERA and Public Works. In response to a Districts' staff request the Orange County Public Works extended from February 1991 to February 1992, the date by when the Sanitation Districts will need to make a determination on use of the site for a water reclamation facility. B. General Discussion of Water Reclamation Implementation Plan Staff discussed progress toward completing an assessment of the resource and scheduling implications of the draft water reclamation implementation plans. At the previous committee meeting staff was directed to evaluate two alternate implementation approaches. The first approach, called Phased Schedule Implementation, would extend reclamation activities over a five or more year period with most activities occurring sequentially as staff and consultants can complete the work. Report of the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee June 28, 1990 Page 4 of 4 The second approach, called Accelerated Schedule Implementation, would initiate many reclamation activities immediately and concurrently. Either implementation plan alternative will include: • Performance of a thorough assessment of reclaimed water marketing opportunities in the vicinity of any reclamation facility. Include estimates of water pricing anticipated for these uses. • Consideration of the phasing appropriate for installing different levels of reclamation treatment and capacity to match the proven market demand for reclaimed water. • Researching and summarizing the reclamation planning performed by other reclamation agencies to be certain all steps are included and the time and resources to accomplish are reasonable. • Assessing the project financing, economics, and feasibility. Staff expects to complete the draft implementation plan alternatives for review by the Committee at its July meeting. 5) Water Conservation Activities Review of water conservation activities was continued to the July 26 Committee meeting. 6) Future Committee Meetings The committee members set the next meeting for Thursday, July 26, at 5:30 p.m. CGN:gb Ref: 030108.RP June 22, 1990 DISCUSSION OUTLINE CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION 3 REUSE COMMITTEE JUNE 28, 1990 I. Opening Discussion Attachments A. Chairman's Report B. Conservation News Clippings Orange C. Reclamation News Clippings Blue D. Reuse News Clippings Green II. Staffing Update for New Conservation, Goldenrod Reclamation and Reuse Division III. Current Sludge Management Activities Beige A. Status Update 1. Sludge Production and Distribution a. RECYC Composting and Recommendation to Authorize Contract Extension b. Curti Composting and Recommendation to Authorize New Agreement C. PIMA ORO Agricultural Land Application d. BRK Landfilling 2. Coyote Canyon Landfill Closure and Sludge Soil Amendment 3. New Cooperative Ventures a. Central Valley Agricultural Land Application b. Co-Composting With Orange County IWMD C. Co-Composting With Village Nurseries 4. Regulatory Liaison a. AB 939/AB 1820- Integrated Solid Waste Management Act b. AB 2295- Sludge as Agricultural Fertilizer C. SIM Sludge Land Ban Policy d. EPA Sludge Regulations B. Sludge Management Implementation Plan IV. Water Reclamation Activities Followup A. Waste Water Disposal company Site 1. Acquisition Status B. Reclamation Implementation Plan status Report 1. Plan A - Phased schedule Implementation 2. Plan B - Accelerated Schedule Implementation V. Current Water Conservation Activities (Scheduled for discussion of July 26 meeting) A. Status Update 1. The Drought 2. County-wide Conservation status 3 . MWD Conservation Credits Program 4. "Miniflush" Performance Report 5. In-Plant Water Use and Conservation B. Draft Conservation Plan 1. EPA/State Grant Program ^ 2. Education Program 3. Industrial, commercial and Institutional Initiatives 4. Initiatives in Residential Water Conservation C. Conservation Implementation Plan D. Phase II Consulting Services 1. Scope, Schedule & Budget 2. Action for selection Committee to Request Consultant Proposals VI. Other Business VII. Next Meeting; July 26, 1990; 5:30 pm. 030102.RP v very day,Americas gush mom due 5 baton goons awitrlwg in IaHlo.sldrwer heads and low-0ush outlets,Every of water down the toga TWs sham 3s baton gaF srnega tram reduced hoo.nter use I.the shower m save SM Ions more than is aningily needed fareffectix Busrom. to Wmine.lawBow fixtures a an benefit grin people who have Amencons also shaven vra 3 billion games of wain their awe wA reduchn,both mor,r coin and the strew as. a day, DA baton gaunt mom dun is needed, septic systnu and leaching fields. Most of that wasted surer cough to.,k,the esdndg Is his,for coos Amednna the common is at whether but water needs,of mom Wan 8g maiun purple .bum muekipaly whey ws sn lowdaw farm in ow home supplied voter Symms. Now,communities mom Boson to Isis San men(California.Connecticut.Cears.is Masaarhuxtn. Angeles and tram Fouts in Houswn ae fiaapq due the cos of New Yet. IBtede lead. and Wxh non) ham taxed lam supplying,inter is racketing upward. requiring I.6gsgon mgets and other mxrsavine fissures is new Drinking inter In ums areas of the country used to be chop momuddw. Mnnwhhe. rim bills working their wry through and abundant.thanks either w pleedhd focal xpp6es arm Feder Congress wubkl set momul sundaes for plumbing fissure and ally subsidised water proles But de si ncov is changmg.With remoe IowBow fuwms in all nr,r construction. as.Uncle Sam gone stingy,old does bike New York ad Boston People in the plumbwRwaum Industry sm not happy about all art had pinned to nom uw theira®eg sum symems And does thu They ague but there's oo need for mguwbons ap wooer and suburbs everywhere art mounding with po11 ud soums sang fixtrne ad point out but,more dun W prevent of lee4 sinking weer able, and the depends of a dung popuhion. inter nestai pn is by unimitar, and Indumy. 'Oath a (Sexage disposal�hethn it wvohee antic cam or sewer syw yecmus im nomnt Most people don't take their drinking some tsma is emerging v another major problem.The yell oublimdi drealy fmm rum,lake,and wells the wry(arms ad Incurin Bnwn Harbormass is NH one ebmnple of m overmemoded sew do.They lase to buy it fmm a undity—and theya save both water age system.A redumoo In the i m and of inner umge mom a end mane,by using loardw booms, educ m I.the load on xmr s,evems.) Ofsuesi®ed'uu mama in fissure manufxmmrs perhaps Sion emndfng as.exiting supply in cheaper duo budding sIhe hoe of their prefitsble'destgon whets should a 1.6gagon m casette.inter must.have lowed with...do..to Bandar l become the norm,tadW,trendy whet art oe"iece urge the adoption of fixtum such es those m lewd or be 'In boy models with on elongated bawd adi a Inge wsermr- reporta dust fagow.For conssrreamss the issue is simple Coo- lag ass.They nenx he n*adapted w Bush with 1.6 indigoes, .don means ormr dams and lee emvommnul damage.Far Manohnuers,has hem priced by reguldhiw yphunbwg- mimicipolides mndervstan pro aim the posponement or em trade groups.which lax raised the opener df a ducat to public Milano of costly new supply and neu niter fvii des. heath B luw-0ush totem m adopted That clam is based on the For consumers comerxion makes nonamic sense vogue,too.By a spicioe due lo wIB wdush whet Ind to clogged sewer our elu totes n average famgy but um municipal inter m draws We've sem no credible evidence that this Kasai in mil .us much m$SB in$75 per ynr on ern and sewer boa by We,It meuwly didn't in our tests for the fulkora mooM CONSUMER REPORTS JULY IM aFs LOW ��sa deny along with the water use. form: Those standards eventually - LUSH To see how the new-age toilets become part of the plumbing codes stark up against a conventional one, in many areas of the country. i we included in our tests a widely While the system has worker ' sold Kohler Wellunortk 3.5gallon toi. enough to ensure that up to nov let and an old. &gallon American the toilets made in the U.S.perform Standard. acceptably,the standard-setting pro- T oilet-flushing represents the Seven of the low-flow toilets use cess ban bogged down over the greatest demand on this gravity to flush,just as conventional issue of low-flow toilets. After i cuuntry�s residential water toilets do. Three use a novel pi almost 10 ,years of discussion. the supply.accounting for about 38 per- surfzed-flush system: A pressure ANSI subcommittee responsible for I � cent of all the water used indoors. vessel inside the toilet tank is oper- promulgating revised standards has i For decades the conventional Amer- ated by water-line pressure: the been unable to agree on appropriate ican toilet used 7 gallons of water pressurized gush is supposed to tests. (In fact. conservationists cite per flush. Ironically, this toilet was compensate for the reduced water the delay as one reason l.figallon the 'modem" replacement for the volume. The new system isn't as toilets have not been marketed old Edwardian-style pull-chain water good as a well-designed gravity- more aggressively.) closet which needed only 2.5 gal- flush system.we found. After looking at existing and pro- Ions to flush. posed ANSI standards, we decided In the late 1970s.fimure manufac- Ht7Cd4OhtlOd to develop our own, more severe turers introduced the socafled The performance of toilets and tests. Our primary tests were waterconserving toilet It uses 3.5 other plumbing fimures sold in this designed to tax in a realistic way a The farther It falls gallons per flush,and has been the country is loosely governed by stan- toilet's ability to dispose of bulky In a gravity toilet, norm in new construction for about dards developed by the American waste and to clean the bowl after. the force in a 10 years.The newer low-flush toilets National Standards Institute. Coro- vi forceful flush are even more sparing: They use plfance with ANSI standards is vol- Our secondary tests Inked at comes from falling only 1.6 gallons or less. notary, but manufacturers tend to how well the toilets could handle water—the higher Low-flush toilets are new only to conform. in part because the stao- floating paper waste, how cony the tank,the Americans. Europeans have had dards are largely created by repro pletely they exchanged water harder the flush. them for years—the 1.6gallon fig- writatives of the big figure between flushes.how farthey would Old toilets ure that defines low-flush toilets companies. Another reason to con- propel solid waste down a sewer maintained a high came about because it's the equiva- pressure with an lent of six liters, the gush volume overhead tank. specified by many Euro- REPLACE YOUR OLD COMMODE? pears plumbing codes. The 11 low-flush toilets we tested. priced from IT DOES PAY TO SWITCH $100 to S285. represent 1 'a every model we could find last fall when we did our Water and sewer cafes vary so ings are based on switching from shopping. Big American widely from city to city, even an older. 5-gallon toilet to a 1. brands like Kohler.Cane, within the same region of the gallon toilet Switching from a i i• and American Standard country, that it's not always 3.5gallon to a 1.6gallon would S had only recently intro meaningful to speak of average save only about half as much. no duced their lowflush mod- dollar savings from watercow H you have more than three el% Ifo Sanitafre, a serving measures. The table people in your household, or if below focuses on 13 Swedish company. has reptesenta- Your water rates go up signiG 9 - ?• been selling low-flush toi. tive cities and estimates the sav- candy. you'd get your money lets here for several voters. ings in combined water and back faster. Installing more than Ten of the toilets are sewer costs that a family might one toilet, of course, would k, meant to replace a conven- expect each year if it switched emend the payback period pro- ir, i• clonal household com- from an old-fashioned 5-gallon portionately. mode. The eleventh is a toilet to a low-flow model. special-purpose model: As If the new toilet cost $200. cin o:•�aati c�i .•nun the box an page 468 including installation, it would explains, the Flush-0- pay for itself in about three years Naar)on Sa.,s $5z Matic is a lightweight las- if You lived in a highcost area Peals 3.58 sa p like Houston and in rbond,rat 3.5a 53 tic device that would suit a just over 12 omiae ass 53 vacation cabin better than Years in moderately priced Day- St. l Ra. 3.z4 a suburban home. tort.A toilet typically has at least San Pan Fnni as csco 2.78 n We also tested a S40 a 20-year life expectancy, so it cirtol o zsa 39 replacement tank, the might pay to change over even if Boron 2.5a 3e Geberlt. that purports to your own water costs are low, too n+gein 1,95 2a turn a conventional &gal- In our calculations,we assume New Yon,city 1.84 z) Ion toilet into a 3.Sgaflon a threeperson family whose chlFago 1.15 17 �r model. The Gebent tank members each flush the toilet at Fresno.onto 1.11 +1 home four times a day. saw oapan.Onto 1.n 16 proved a disappointment, y Souma Prow.vvo,v a Co reducing the toilets effi- 466 CONSUMER REPORTS JULY 1990 HOW A LOW-FLUSH TOILET WORKS Is th.good old days As long as toilets had lots of water to work with,casigners needed to pay but soon ape eson to to urMerhing hydraulics of a flush.As one designer told us.' ou .... took a lump of clay, Molded it,drilled 30 holes by hand.It wasn't a pmoision instrumem.'Large volumes of water simph leveled our Me sample-to-sample vadaaons.Win Iow-flush toilets,every ounce of water has to Ee put to mn Here's hoe w basic types do that Th. yrai Oash The rmst elegant;--. ais�vN"r ) solutions use gravity to speed the wuesec of water through Me howl and trap.The-- m rim vrash0 comes s.The an open' ra0ler than side holes The n may;... y - have steep.sides©and a narm«ed ra w .aC ;:- opemn Me Imr!Limiting Me artioumot es-- neld in the howl on taal2e I ly In - ings.Low-nusn rollers generath nova a-'^ smaller pool n,or water spot' r �' comientorW roa u eta:four by rive Indies:- d:'14 rather Nan eight by nine.Thu water spot does mean mare haquent- �afu act % 'g"r "ter claurnrg n c e met bush f'qL "''T' ".•�\� - y ±Vw' kb hd.� `-���-�-i NY4M Nay to el0e956 �'�. A 4 tpq .'valmor nEptme a Pressur®d nosh Q6 - . I�� d�OJt grs.lmnae3 wamdine wrMin p the, YNT; t - gessras_w>tlar(ialrrrnavessel©whin thtpam . / �Wve>Bec�p'r�aecagaiTlst a rubber diaphragm ve r cc pessirg a pocket of am Pnelr flLeltJ�ve0teleasesthe water Other J , rme tptyrastaa air from an oufslde sourc>K �L z'amrryrasaar ar oortpaRad au raNa.lrt ....✓✓ prmwrha6Mdr tolets C do Nvuk tie wee z4 -.+ .. tflel.rt deagred gemgnush rTadels x i-]. MNSUMER REPORTS JULLY 193e - an — I draa lice and their propevsry for aplahivg durinq S flub. mug-From a sales point of vie.. the Mort difficWl dullaRe son m dope a Inl malttvl Thu atmvely wmuldes honed ems meow ANSI uses a dual tea In one moves.Nm auks to.to flush a load of 100 Nree,c o..eoina plastic t t; III A second senea uses. (� filled late cylindm Nember am diderendates very dearly one a, let's performance tom anothers. - Far w the ln ,cy[mdmK So I.I.sgpoory Nat opi,clat we "I'Mcdc for en had a real problem with Nes e oer now We N id Ne reds as hasagahpe mod, A water-erred bed verswionas of wpm pplaatle lug In a pitted the rtalt a be mart _,a�.:gSC sgallon toted, suineeody than ANSI does For one tank will reaam door.we omm up amore rest- It the volume otc aualog Ovule mst91. ro Mthoa annin eg posed of coarse stations located dw"I".bond mi tacr nth flow said shortewtaa _ t punt use• d inducting a sW6tlent momliry a bdcM.It per of luny.ho0aw plastic bads to make � dMmegrate and It jug tartly buarnl-This stoked ISM the Iona. It as a s,vee led of a tn, - Frei.�.yryi. reds waysbandgng abdity.The up five I of a Iota of them cyWdm of the Material as one flush ao oQgma Saw.dal tons Wperwasse said Rage ga iatookawronyaonai b, per/mmava.The non not mods b be a pmblm for Ia.Auah meets Im aooa two guaha te avenge as well as the old Want modmt We use a troad (along Inds its m dm a bad of wmc mmetiol took two gushes Ibkh was su0 Trapper alFeawl and s,sing fed through a not.,drab pipe Must very goad The boeomaad mike of ages nape, None of the Ia its of thm topraed agent took abmw ! Islas IS happy,the bowl eve after had any rebutltble problem. 214 flusher on average.The differ, five flusbet. AM bulk-mast ace nab squatio st.and we give We looked nen a arh toilet's &Vold.a raider's gouty to,reuse With make hart to four lo"im, me bawl a it Posh-is pbbabty it models Evm a mget'soup,poorly MMaa appormr mebum. Toilets w sus too shouldn't past emblems Casan"T eatinewgab UghothogM plasem Nat love stab of residue may, w red life However.if You hive a FlushO-Mabe(5233)is only for a ngsGe anal wtpel Some people red gush again unusual imogadon. Say a salilmy severey water4epriveC etivltonmeld.To flush. and Saudi. .Isar defeat the pun half.bvkoom Ned dada wed a a study spnng-loaded handle opens a flapper pose of a bwadua mile,We used very long hotimnml alumbina roo, valve in trap:water flows only as long as han- two bases of masks(see lb deal;-. you should thous,a model that old the tlepresse is 0.a real water-saver it rases The too Mm Gas aged ad stag here. ( Santa IoaWueb maids rid Nee i only 5 to t gallon).But d handle is released selves of assa lly ail Ne stale ROW"MWWalion quickly,snappy valve can catapult whol lts of m as flusl, M the low.tow loges use a la Fowl up and out Oram-lime dina deg. Plumbing lead.ruuoacoaerutiaaltogn- wade snowed..,hme Solemn Wr In choosing one model over aoth- Imeed 'flush mlumn all cause In.what maned mesa is bulk-wave don w a house's main drain too, dispdal add ball ckaoswg Thrte 1 Thule feed —1 justified Water models acedbd the Win, generated] by oNerfuwrn on the Wrllumek ut.S240 the5ran 556a. '{ draw lice lsha.en w Wren susses) SIOD pia Wooiag Said the W(t- aught to ropoleaam for she agttl rode. S2S1. We woad Mmmmmend ____ meal Say of Nos wMout rtsttwtioa m the only aI comparison WE the Sam,also Sold IS the Un- v� mady,teknowotw Phoeo¢drai- ansig Fswh,is clearly the bargain ' lie dogaidg appeased to be a of the gaup. wozwgs lowdaw toilet Nan with While Ne oilers a the top of the romentioal3—won b tper umps Clog. Raunn ouformed the toilet gag of the miles itself was a be lower on the lie that daso't man bleed with u the come- N lowerriaduhg toilet would nos _ ere perform adegatNy The ad. moo I wow_ aim rm,deviled m the tonal ioglmi Anmma Sam I :fwJ~.'�":.": CONSUMER REMM'S J"Y teen #:_, 'x dard would haze ravtad aboutamh wbe ve9 goad perfarmea vues broaden lhep band Unes..aa iv Ule Radags—yea ro pe(anname The Smn 5561 ud dse cam of vM.5oM mlvavao sNl evsu has proved ameW ld ova mav9 ropy sulWar p(n 1.6 wee Toil ea labelM`a-aru ft se r» y. The .ISgalloa KM4n dowmalcd bevuse J moron r afte are not pe«aarily low W.RwarM.the mndN M1vial of the sap opmivg pad a bard time wiW dash rodeft Often ffi,,Ne 1. '.d.a used m « padumma, our hWY w. mareriW. galon v m tLa have been i wauld have I..topped our R ,- law-0ush l.9e m 4 dUkdh as-Wlable :« years True low-0ush Using it and dle Sgagon Ammma w ad.az we WyweN wpm we models gmerally Oar soap lapels Saaadard az guidepovs wed judge did q shopping. tpaa sinupop as'1.6 gallon:'Wmlow-0ush."or avy of the mop fire law-0ush lodes ahoWd impmve az mort manWac- tdgh<Ifiamcy.' e e o • RATINGS c YId.MWaesaMYXMbYI paaW.N RM..A mina aOM wnn B1 n.SM1a GnoMnEwfx w]aaWMM9.nElaw mrwmm«Yna neap d,' lo-aaw.a • IaWtTbE ar LebptlwuaWWa btlaro YNwnavea pa«anuoonnnona Lbbtl by gwpa a bif a prAl W. oaaM CaIllfYnO mro pvn daftaa ant Mmm�m Na wenr m.,.oawr q a0epy m asddaa al a� WWevae raw lYndus�egiMMrsr.�w trawa o-Me nT. �amamawrn M we1er mar yegp gM�, line er«va Minuaaalayppetllro Oelan retina rz.ro less mlwon.ova mots obe ae m. Aner '1tMYag w maYltl saM Ww1.wanes Pe eglet.aM meae- OIXu.vmet cu o.m sat IMI, - means moss ma war m M wMar aaa m.ecwl eMptq I'da a ama. Mai MpewaleR lnM nmlm. rM Ces� aiaww 1.Y maa me ®OaYer 'er Mh sirce w.lm rannea coy b�p«gama'aaaa me ft v m me aue aye m soy eemm. alanpavn voles a IOne aawranq la M powt a�a Sao M nenvY a Manes n me`aOfat lan rows man one oan in 20p. gaeena.Wn Heaves Water uN it Mo «.to seer n On.Tdo-emrmq MOMS bn B Dfta d uay.rvow well a W..-nUN papMCaM lCeninMp'lll era BpmWaaaW 'rryewMina afM«b MfR YY ra ary lgbt¢ula'✓anapan solq ova Mes aPvna eware+MlOMa lwnanx wn«maMM.lhaWaalbn fewM OTe.' aa®MeMwaaa Iaeyy a o.M f inT uIemrnM erran uaom u rM19111y 25W MyeM(p/etlrylWy prN ae«�;np{ealWlNawa lneaSeauneaa a w n nl lar lwr usacnm ova . m .f nA deftda'amv+wM enalana uamom symeoc lkvgaR Stan- alaMm aaat'amNb rN ea Y ftd e mampM MIXroMwsmqmroepmu.assyn W pde an StmTb g smat ygMWqmMGMCw nand xnnMeIM nuan.aMmwm.flu.nmwa s- oontonee navm aearea mono-amrma O.ewo nuuWe ign m tlW anM arb Tha b1 non m.ny gala C.am wm.aown toaaa MMiea. mpuaatlWl't tlreeMeM enW Me MIa 1Naft is nlM9'1 ahadLMfta loll TM precxalame"-X'rerotaa9reM a m anod MYNrOMW a•. lwW M to pYYYw hMYld,tlb Wmet Y aw My Yem.In arnrs aY.a. �nage m Mtoar rwa w vw lluvMq o am. �1°�tft lmm oamr na,Ymla e.NrY lewsalo aq p«nro WrappYMM anmwra apwaam.. OgMatlla rdr OM oonbaury m Mnow=M ftm waztegw� B - Wee.+ Zee40 �Z/z eaYw MagwlY Wa WO L Ie o O O O O // s...aY.e ssaigal..a.ayaaalal +wa ,w Is O O e O o E Maaauga m IA IL O O O • • at wawa M to to O e • e o aaa Maelaagwaa M1a In If 15 O G C e e YwYw ago to M e O O O O ac.o eYarimmmJ�eaaaaaatw In a 1.7 e G O O e a.cn.E M.Unam vm 1.I oe O O O O • ga ""SMI(A aaNr1 I.. Is 15 • O O O m MY IA 1. IA Is • • e • m O�1meyYMnrMauen.MMeMbWa.Mwbei.aYpnra.., mnsa.mnre.ao.u„s.oracgnmwydew ovum 4ala4ra MLgmyaYPibMaFe6 0.B1WI�eM1InR B-eWaYaroaPoblaPaMa E-WWIn MeoatlWbaab.WYY�Y CJIYPaanRwleWlOn. Mt'aebnWMaMailaga.M. C SUMEM RSPOMIS imy ftm age LOW-FLOW SHOWER HEADS S-umt] and Ak SMwn fill prion 5 sMJu. PriceU. w h guide b the wally ofNeahowvheads nt aeNeNgh- A plenum io lee c vor. r use non a0 new mover heads a eifragSlfior ind ne eka heads can with a IhnR hat Mown, a use no mote duv 25 gaiba per $(Owlex Mdtoesyesivem. vryane with IttPiRt tt the some. Ps W Man.SR,eve 0m W house rm areas But iha.t wo- we bought and tatty 3a b.Pe. Ak SMS,SN.wets az ou bhnn.r ohl that , and of all the mom hods of na nowged-p typs of Neu grvuW w the Wdngs .azer vied wewn ma nmrt ha Toth. tine art fi Iung ad .upthm anYatherfimue or appLL hods the linhhM, swiveling had tW^a5 it an IlW. T. awe hand-h Ne mover We meua. the mover heads fundingtialov-0o.aheweahod laps To m Fmdheld erelo mav'muma yarnepr the ups baho,rao that ewes, wpu phone'nods MirhmtetheMm fourh WlAtI the ,.t1,y ur�of or. sr,on Nuwaxrala Fp SIOMe the shhwerpipewMaBeldbl<hox. 20 me m&Bfr pi Mla.Wesson.they e x per mown in. !i(v. Me Thoae ha . Bon r fimue thman nuoute born IA to 2.a gallon per 10.000 gallons of hoer in yen l wry mil. fprihe fined 1.8 to 5i goo, Al Naz glo,nure. the the e,w it look In hot W type,hem 9 b M:for the hard affront half the heda produced 2s Mat caner,perhaps S20 to S50. U beds horn Sit to M. mm or Ins ..g Ne/d pang Me aelheR gun,raur onfleemi,none DenRas and styk'a vary widely, mower if Me pending waurrfimee wry.Savings depend annog other ono.The sonvil m fiveep".pn legadmov bemmn ll thmRs ov ha,,,long and M1or,often heal Nn deU mr holy one type of y Jahraly.1,tera shaker,vhirh spar. cash as a wedy rain or a had of shower heads yw wrrendY min.Othm have adju noun knobs Go with the dart The shower own. and how much yw pay for or levee that give two or more heads offer M"ways to adjust hodvg=axr.l sla'aYanmvs wmedmnincludiaR the flow pattern.Panelists shongly Befart 1980,mower hthds could a pulse or 'matagi spray The disliked a knob in the caner of the cl fine to eight Rallaip knot m of ost complth. two handheld speyn 0 .Ilse that on the im- p r mwux. Over Ne Ian deodr, ltn n meads hate fear dinner rated Msons Sorn urseh The pre, oggenede caner sikro hone spay paverns a Nreegovfinn potnpted wblk olfieala. adiumnevt for then Fern,and a - tense a knob an the side ,as wnsunxn,and mmafae 'repdasor Imab narked for IS m on the Kohler Gay Club:or a nng- ►aeell"be ferverlle uren to cant to red. do¢s of Bow rue. amund-tha4mad type U,as on Showering staffers gave thu i gro o the Water Pk Shower Massage. highest votes to stmvr• - ITvivR thss drought Sale so it bw am from see han6held anerarnees mavr harm The key keno.with a 1ow4. heads.$be.is awnm wau0ed Bow heid'u rot so tmpls the aumdty c f Telecryne's Water Intl ontrrtem weherblte vale a the ou.fiy of the mower. 00, Shanner Massage $43. duke dual fit out a mow- w R timed to a noel of snows.Mott uses Ime wagr as Wn eve. But Umg heawly mstrwnenudper ninths Nan the eemm�n the fin. thawerhwhtrwrbubwoneofour hly other bast ked hi f Me scatthee mM MOW. to soggy snub tmk eo fRNeshaverab Rwith 150 Nowen wet Ne onke wxv-Me Seats 20173 SZl. .s the Row and dt erL months Siva a Rood sewer 7�7gimpy removed Neat memo diffee hustr NwRf a diffrth to Mevwnae. "natty uipunt we in41aOM Me tdfeet to speed have shed how ari M Me hear ad the hutrts to . - . f n the Bow 8er the ben ila.v thH coWd by _ tarn o1 new aJwtpr Rev awn Iildltf Afln cell ShoRr. p� fount .hle quaeR of eked Ne ta(/en how welthey /�` 8 ' mawuw the vua He of LYrd the macaw. w a 0vepowt /.. 'L the hl (or. Node ,,since for for, caw we rev cats for exn sawn !, usually haw a artvwer hnd ut t lair and 0Wirth pound, p e '. Y.. A V wraY w eh Ira veer square h I) and d wunda per , i - mien Me mawper wale well a counter in range the troy alw erne au in Heely us M,encounter w 01e teal with the water,m rmle world For the s rhos our cod, ° a 1M. .Bow, to liked the same hMs at bath ,. Moss et Me aev low avd him peauei The r- ` ' newer hews avalabit one snow m based al pn. s m er 3 heads da ems u BO psi, bm R aim nee F deliver S ga0ana per ahmerhthds Nnwere parliwluiy numn, or Ins L•Rials bled(or alab'Yed)az 20 psi don h n dito w nferee, Pmelim Naeed II of d. fined suu and =dares wvaou numvor very Mond.Bmthe Nat wawa rr wmendf n;Rbrt yhtes went to Me hand-held SuspeRmr Jet mesa people dap't DMIW and DMIM were nosey a shower Minn both hot and cold taps high pressure. going full bloc we ska meaurm P the laud Sob mine our panelists sleaad whin they showered.They O showedvg sullen gave hWh allays used less Nov the ovmmuov marks to It fiaedposifion showers ...� possible ......6. and five h.d held Dues Mek of the Died Eleven fixed . ,a.. per mNme lea At few, Several of Ne feed heatls per heads gave very good showers,said Pressure- they used m avenge of mnelisb bkm bet are smelly parallel.In that group,they Used L4 gp.az Ngh pre'mre.u eP. good buys Among Nose.eye Spur the$6$gaps 20190(above)every be m avenge. 2'lim and she lher.Somr ml m merle as die$39 Chatham. meemsdngb.aurpmNimdid net met poly S6 or so: the Rerossau automatically feror higher Saw Canurvmr.sour$9.while the$8 run over nes.They gave N.-Rfas to WI-F.d$tU2irM. top markstopipe bury high1owme 149550 mere veury.wammdve head, the ltgapon Sass WIM. nod had the ended wore of h®g _ Ina didn't much like the 32gWlon Lkm even at law pressure AhOa Somme And while they Uyoubkeahau4heldshowa.m found more heeds W them bluvg fur the Sean WIM S23. or We when the suer w.a high prey Web P SMJU.Sa Of eye[ sure. they eePuboSY bkm he m the Wdar PJ used shornn a gaga zim heads an low presum. Im per misuk az Inept a high `. Low presare proved ten great a presure.se wed r®ovmmd It m hurdle for eye mDek Its perfar, emlogival d not on eanane, manse az M P. was m piety we grounds U You have natebly low couldn't rare it them sad Q yom water prterare w your WNsmm, own water Nm ere is on the law yen might hays to remore Ne Sow ahk.retch. Ifm Q da 't soot he We. avoid de, Wy d. Several rturicror hum Nt WebMtoM mmeoffessil stndytheinlesp'im other models the permnned poorly a decent shower.A goad mdidae ahh a pipe wrmrh Then simply a Ivw Present,Hough be.r dwa a low pmmu[e would be We saew the new hod into PUc. eye NYDeL are noud'm Ne Palings Pollens Did AnJs,rDMM%C using the apprpprvre ML Three Warn Its models eoWd The panelists felt it performed be, ud. he Nsuuctioas specify have suffered the sine fate, but ter az 20 poll Net a W. otherwlse, we usually s good idea thew Co. remictors could be me ollieg a new shorn one,h a to wind the pipe Nreld9 with a few reversed orremoud to inaeaxthe m mle task Follow to diasvo. om.of pipedoNt tape.available at Saw.As flue Ratings note,we made nWt move with the hod Thu use hadwae Nines And not a nil Nose adNsenepa N our to vp spy coma removiogthe old aho•c he[wea the Plier jaws on.not to sure vials as a effort to pbtvu M1od wuh cage open m m adpa oso the hrsme's fetich decent shawl Turning the resumer around or renovae it ..0 -..__._ � __ Low-now didn'e make Nem mghdaw bode: . s` g�ww�iiii- Y��A At Ivw Pressure.they sail deWertd �+ "1`Ittb- Ito than 2.5 8pm S we crept a� �T- 'vaprmedwith head vh de,wp ._ IS THERE'A SCALD HAZARD. lea Ym�ven enmma8esyawn .all L .�,y_>+ .-.f. . . rwose Ne paw resu.ur s/AA4-. ✓ ,T.. T..__ -A fee-lsrt.-6wSs tied.., too®ilutwe,e pow"Dlombed to berm''. F We flu eel spew edlhrs.thcvazl. ,-e..« ..bah.cam pmmblsg pramce ipes Nat We guhered ppivime ad coin -'.Booed lI a hoe the--,:Snttmeaaamah d do pees eed 0 mrno h eirsh el'ab effe net - -,pm>mrL drvldQ_thc vetodm the_�ouurvo Uaam.am Nat wool.2 m. dudoe Neirshowmlmme/lortm -..,pemilio8'lv�l:win.ellin Xp lot._-mmhniretheer notlee dfordmjmo•- pin dawn Use nth u it win NN liked -eferias�Tlac tLevLfl6+dZ P®�.-: doll Plumbme mdn mS for eye maap- or didn't llke abet[came beach We ' SeaheaNpiBrmaa�ibil6sa�mlaL Set suNrsrme. or Hvaeesaesube .'. found eta no Rmaal agreement beau$¢atheshbwer,aFbPobehpwc:.. bWa®e odvea or avdsmW .eye be th w over, tome a goad showed.For bead;h, resses,dw,'-iflo isolmv showers any d whkh should aLw obrvm the moo part lmeliso wee -..:rememe-Rtaas.mle�lFgb=aziw.pw..,..Ne unimpsesoure the mWrip4 .# .'.�lPl=-- seodsramoev -�. -Qwmld belie mmherl- T rounnet : feamro same headspUeml Newry ke theahaeefsm bmbee� yanrehmrer�yourhand)ameyhaewme all Nestollen saangyhe kind crn ter-adrvstinevt Imabs the kind Hal rleemply mu;kvagwlghphb�ma tot Sdsh Use enSN Q Nee ls a si ith your twig Yautororhimo Nesur® present s pile te[eda�hdeu•eg is 4 ha.c nod when eye Infestm adNa the Sow paverv.Panelists is up mrypepfrnosrgN W. rash smW9linamda paiisap®gvelse .thnhed tluneare9ai drink-eptiowH ipg uP and moeho(a rinsing.sry, thso estil" fmi a mJvne PoWmg.timerth< a lawdueh hod.Ether has m aviscaW markedly pNemdmmNsmav[ sp[�d mdmm ve nesaed.Here win rNeu aapW GPb fmaPlmnberl.es9mr Oa the sWe had OrpenpeeoteNehead °dead asaldhamd- .bunt hoarlower(to ldw orm).mmake They one other strongly The problem shewldn't o¢m ah-iuh sort the door ls larked when yen shower. held ooinwiao-due the Papas CONSUMER REPORIM JULY 1990 aT RATINGSsake o e o c I$ ®r.neu•1: rorlenno. Thou awns Shower heads that we re liked most cam pr..�Yks 51•w"r•U•Now many gel- Ne type of eµn.nl device seen head era mnved from he.aperie.C.Of•panel slslemly earned the highest accuse.those Ions per mimm�Bath shower nedd . Movd es-Center(S),ring(11.or kno0151. ' OI aYNers.P•OYiats were instructed 10 ad. Net were most dissolved got the Iowa Sl. produce with the supply laps tufty open at Panelists Lest liked center adluslmenY. Wnd by type in Order of prabnnce as Phil each sbovens desired,and afterward Those with middling scores,and thous the, andOgh water has pressures which foruydu to teeth Into the spray delermined0yepenel0lusen.WlWntype, asked whinge how was May hed it Th. were leadtl...and dnLSW by ONin, ©ipq tied plus uNb9•The Motor ©r.Yrle6/141d The construction me. a racketed models Zfe about equally pre judgments are daseal on lest$Conducted at nrg senNge(d611... whet and do deal and lmish lays,lm..In head:pI.Sh. house, no are listed In order of Increasing 80 psi pressure;The heads generally scared Qro1616' 11n-r.10.Here we es' how umber Of different falls saftn". .1 any. (P),motel(ill)Or Cldame finish.pletiIII) �fNe. •Iml0 borer e120 P51.(See CaniMnts Co. average flow rate.In gallons far honuM.OW each sfgw.r head Could prod.. Sone We noise no MutOrm•OC8differaf4Sdo- at CU peed, ..d 10 1e. ...for fuse-Web In.wo.S•I$emll.- peOellYs actually used.1 His at .,May modes.noted W Me Comments,had no. tween a plesuc and arMtO head. Oaenat daSr. telly liked Or disliked at YO part Nose, menage other agents as well.We eISO note B WYnaII.COven.ge of pens. ■nsai-M:'V• ■16:'rrtl.:asks ■P.al.rlid's ze 0700 ar.rY ■ ■ J'O JJ J$ J� 4sP d p ■ V Fixed-Ns hiss,she...heads Ao `>.Pv:;d`: m ai,m.n,Iw.ad.a burs. ..r dvie $hewn Used 20190 $0 C 21 xe 24 all - - _ - YF - - chow.ow Y ad a Iwo.and x`�awuro 1.hard.sue n...a s.as.O hens am s 1.5 OS $f xs _ _ _ - a yWm •........t....n•It..ThdamdM.Need M 111 r C t0 I.1 1.0 ..a Y 12 he bin`nw,. trip` fin-Ple.2....slash-dnd 14.96014 0 e Ill a.a I.a Oe 1 ✓ N Y A.N IIe-Il.e Waln PinM1n 14d550 to C Ill IIA La a.T - Y - A 1W Nbkskss.b A valm0 iti'NNdwi Wh.4e$a..r she..,152C 10 C In 21 a 25 - _ - Y .Y o B-can a.dai lope. er.al whnllons Whin sear■.... .928400 11 C so a.• 12 ae _ e P - ea o.y:man oie:rna�nc wp.o,."w`v. •Hers-w••dsrd lh.ortlnd Mo...10509.0020A be r, Y ae IS 19 - - C YF - C 0-1uogaa ire bop. n`ia.1 see.E-l . Wealth.W.I..FIS shown ll..0 5SM-20 24 C lbGg a.4 24M an - - a R WIa 1 wire�iwn`.l..1.a..a nwnnginew.dl. (book..5.1141nu$he.W Ned 4A-01 W 'S 2..7 20 20 - - If he - J N-S.aaawni.s ad,sU.-I awl, Tdd s weln Pies Shen rn.e .8 SM4 w C m all a is • N YF Ia N al i .mmid`i`.Our. np°s,. Ill O I3 4 4 e N C - s.OJ . . rd.d w.n....d. u.n.h6 3110 nvdons k-I..wnMuyay niu.raga ni Nor... rehashes 8ld r.... a0rlsa 19 O IJ x0 2.3 u - : R P a 0x Oq Neer 1NO2 19 O 1.1 2 -0 la all - is a Y-Cana nuuixucnpn. 1 ..h.ee Se e x0 m. .$2252- T w 0 Ill x0 2.0 - N YF - J Kohl.,Of,flues N-1351 75 0 is as xa as _ _ N Y la eJ NY-Ors SSO-II a Q le 1.1 IS _ C P - CA Oedln.w.br 9 Q 1 zs 1b - _ C YF - C besln Tr.I.l 1740 V40 tl tou Q x4 III a].1 - _ e OIIC W C N6.n sunost Na 11 Q Ill Oa is 4A - _ C YQ is C 5..ek..e len.pllln lffa0.AT Ia Q L9 as 2..3 xe w _ C SUP - c � (!•-. Pall....Mad taus .Or10f I? Q 12 1.5 1.0 xiv, a R P 5 64C Missilene Nis densest NtlIn 69K So Q I2" 2.4 1.8 al 1 N C I 0J Yen F.I.M6.2935 as Q 10 40 IS xa 1 N Saysa4 J.Y YnOialdaMor M.Os _ _ - x 5....hr.eed N.ndsh wnfelaf ad O u 3.1 Ill d. 1 R YlC Usable.W.I.,Pik sheer r.... .S IN-fg w O sap all Lath ae a R See 12 1 rue.N.dsh.wsH{fR 11 a 1.1 as 1a to _ _ _ P O Al oe•Ale.. .A.16.P.InO. 4S0 5e a IS as se v WIx - 010edniped?Several shower hea0s,like rase rdntlee a9u So Ill of Ill age I N YP 24 F this Pollenex Dial Massage D1.1209,prodde bldyu water Flh Sepr am"IN be O sI 22 IA xe t R W 1s - more choices than you might want to make first Poll....old rn....DN209 a O is all all s4 a L R Yry 5 A.k Virg in the morning.This$24 model can give Pell....01.1 ad....../lM1mrrl.l0raf0 a9 O ,, ae 23 1.9 a r R YIP 5 l you a mist.a fine Spray,a Memo spray,and Pg4I91uh 2461 35 O 1.1 26 1.7 2.1 1 R PF Ta a 'several pulse Settings.Our panelists Were not . bl.d as web Pik lhksoer Ills. .ISM-S as O 'Am z1 ism 25 - 4 R PF Ia a Impressed with the variety of features nql Nmade little use of them.This model was well b.rnnaaP wereiaayer efteanon! down in the Ratings of ha� 'I heads. m reanexa0.( 7el,rcwnrxNan 472 CONSUMER REPORTS JULv I990 CONSUMER REPORTS JIN.Y t99p industrial Water Conservation Saves Big Bucks Most industries in California can - '. • � conserve water and save monev .imply by implementing cost-ef- ,. •„ tective conservation measures. Thib is exactly what several Indus- •� r _—� tries in the San Jose area are ft►! � -, already doing. F �;" /�/ x '\ Conservation measures imple- mented by 15 companies in San Jose reduced their combined ' I water consumption by more than I billion gallons a year. The - 1 economic benefits from these I+ it it ` conservation measures resulted in hR a combined savings of about 52 million a year. J ; r A report,just released by the California De artment of Water Resources, verifies the same water ML8 i 31 conservation measures applied by these San Jose companies can be Water conservation is gaining prominence by many California readily applied to other compa- industries. Photo courtesy of Brown and Caldwell Consultants. nies to get the same results. The report, Case Studies of Indus- essing. The report describes their To get a free copy of the report trial Water Conservation in the San water uses, conservation meas- contact: Jose.area,describes the water- ures, water savings and economic conserving measures these com- benefits. Department of Water Resources panies use and explains how these Central Records—Publications same measures can be used by The case studies and report were P.O. Box 942836 other companies in other commu- jointly funded by DWR and the Sacramento,CA 94236-0001 allies to achieve the same benefits. Citv of San Jose. The case studies were researched by Brown and For information about industrial The 13 case studies covered four Caldwell Consultants. Brown and water conservation, contact ;ndustrial groups—electronics Caldwell also prepared the report. Charles Pike at DWR's Water manufacturing, metal finishing, Conservation Office, (916) 323- paper processing, and food pros- 5580. dmt I990 5 California 's New Toilet Efficiency Law Last September the Governor around 6500 gallons of water per In addition, a number of Califon signed into law a new toilet household a year. nia communities,such as Big Bear efficiency standard that changed Lake,Santa Monica and Morrow California's plumbing require• "Another advantage of ultra low- Bay, have active toilet replace- ments for the better. The new flush toilets is users do not need to ment programs. Using different change guarantees water conser- change their habits to conserve methods, these communities are vation. water. The toilets automatically removing conventional toilets and conserve water. And it's not an replacing them with ultra low- Beginning January 1, 1992, toilets inconvenience to consumers flush models. Some communities that flush on a maximum of 1.6 because they don't really notice purchase the ultra low-flush gallons of water will be required the difference." toilets and install them free for in all new residential and com- homeowners. Others offer rebates mercial buildings constructed in to homeowners as an incentive for the State. replacement. Since 1983, virtually all new "Another advantage For more information about ultra buildings in California have been low-flush toilets,contact Deborah required by law to have toilets of ultra low-flush tol- Braver at DWR's Water Conserva- that use a maximum of 3.3 gallons lets is users do not tion Office, (916) 322-1067. of water to flush. need to change their According to Deborah Braver of habits to conserve the Department of Water Re- sources' Water Conservation water. The toilets Office, "Ultra low-flush toilets are automatically con- very effective water-conserving S2fVe water..." devices. In fact, many conserva- tion experts consider them to be one of the most important ad- -- Deborah Braver, DWR Urban vances in urban water conserva— Water Management Program lion. Manager "For example, the average family using a 3.5-gallon toilet flushes away about 12,000 gallons of Many cities in California,such w water a year. With an ultra low- Goleta, Novato and Monterey, flush model, the same family will already have local ordinances only flush about 5500 gallons of requiring ultra low-flush toilets in water a year. That's a savings of all new construction. 8 Water Consenation Mxos Ultra Low-Flush Toilet Manufacturers The California Department of Housing and Community Development maintains a list of water closets approved for installation in new construction in California. The manufacturers listed below provide ultra low-flush toilets. The toilets have been approved by HCD for use in California,and Bush on1.6 gallons or less. American Standard,Inc Eljer Industries Inc U.S. Plumbing Products A Household International P.O. Box 2003 Company New Brunswick,NJ 08903 901 10th Street Plano,TX 75074 Aqualme An Elier Industries Company Excel Impex Ltd. 901 10th Street 2440 Viking Way Plano,TX 75074 Richmond,B.C,Canada V6V 1N2 Artesian Industries,Inc. 201 East Fifth Street Fabricas Orion Mansfield,OH 44901 Carlyle Atlantic,Inc. P.O. Box 1848 Briggs industries,Inc. Laredo,TX 78041 4350 W. Cypress Street, Suite 800 Gerber Plumbing.Fixtures Tampa,FL 33607 Corporation 4656 West Touhy Avenue CR/PL Inc. Chicago,11 60646 2020 Dempster Plaza, Suite 1235 Hocheng Pottery Manufac- Evanston,IL 60202 taring Co.,Ltd. The Alps Corporation Dal American,Inc. 3 Butterfield Trail P.O. Box 2096 P.O.Box 9875 332 West US.Hwy.20 ' El Paso,TX 79982 Michigan City, IN 46360 IFO Water Management Delta Faucet Company Products Divisional Headquarters 2882 Love Creek Road 55 East 111th Street Avery,CA 5224 P.O. Box 40980 Indianapolis,IN 46280 Kilgore Plumbing Products Highway 259 North P.O.Box 472 Kilgore,TX 75662 lunr 1990 9 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Name of Paper Seldcn Page Date Subject Turning off water wasters San Clemente has cop to make sure r people go with flow By Andrew Karen The Orange County Register SAN CLEMENTE — Bearing a smile and a pocketful of aqua y - -,Don't be a waterhog" lapel but- - tons, Orange County's only water cop is friendlier than her ominous moniker would suggest. "My goal for the summer is not j. 5. to give out a single citation;' Lois _ Curtis said last week as she pur- sued a tip that someone was being piggish at the spigot. 71 Since April, when she began pa- •' trolling for water running wild in ., •,:,"" the streets. Curtis has received ,r- L. - _> about 500 calls from residents with adrier-than-thou attitude.About 95 percent of the calls turned up leaky sprinklers and other water wast- ers, Curtis said. At first,the calls trickled in at a -w rate of to a week, but in the past two weeks residents have show. • ered Curtis with 15 tips.a day. Her pace has quickened as the • v -"` r weather warms and residents brace for Orange County's only mandatory water rationing, which goes into effect Friday. Rationing ends Sept. 15,when cooler weather _ is expected to ease demand for wa- ~ `:�-` }" ter. Coping with the state's fourth f year of drougb.t, about 150 cities from Santa Barbara to San Diego —and nearly half of Orange Coun- ty o-; .•.. . `yy' 4 ty's 29 cities —have passed men- :;,- sure!asking resident-to trim their water use oy 10 percent, Southern ciq rnlb a.eyii cw^n'nrglWr California water distract officials Lois Curtis talks with Charlie Newton of.r;n -lememe Car Wash said. ahout a leaky sprinkler.She's been on the water patrol since April. Please ser, WATFRIS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Name rn Pacer Sec'icn Page Data Snu CLEr1EnJYF Subier, i REG (5TSR Ci (�-N-qa u/A7ER CONSER✓f/TioN WATER: Rationing rules go into effect Friday in San Clemente FROM t Only a handful,such as San Cle- cent m April and a percent in May, mente,have chosen to put enforc. Curds said. Throughout Southern ers on the street,however.San Clr Water rationing California, water use is down by mente faces an imminent crisis about l0 percent this year.said Jay this summer because a single pipe- Malmowski, spokesman for the line feeding the city cannot refill Friday, San Clemente residents and businesses must begin Metropolitan Water District, the the main reservoir as fast as resi. limiting water use or pay slid fines. Rationing ends Sept. 15. region's largest water supplier. dents and businesses drain it. Residents:Can only water lawns from 6 p.m. to 9 a.m. on Still,some are finding it difficult The crisis is expected to pass by to put their good intentions to work. alternate days. If the ciys mein reservoir drops, the ban will 1991, when a second pipeline cant I know all about[beploperR problems;extended to prohibit using hoses to wash sidewalks.clean to double the e t s supply. Mean- wantCaseyconserve,"idas urtis developer fined while, residents must radon or cars and refill swimming pools. Households must limit use to bee Casey said as Curtis explained Day 650 gallons a day or Rey a surcharge on their water bills. the restrictions to him. "You [ell The law bans or limits outdoor, Businesses: Contractors must stop grading or use ap- me I can only water an inch a water uses and imposes fines for proved non-drinkable water at projects. Merchants and institu- week,but how can I translate that those who ignore the restrictions. tions must limit i rigation to 1 inch a week or pay water-bill into a way to tell my gardener how The cuts grow steeper as the water surcharges. long to let the water run?" level in the 18.million-gallon reset- Worsening shortage: It the 48-million-gallon reservoir that "Put a tuna can under the sprin. your sinks. supplies San Clemente drops below 35 million gallons, all kler and see how long it takes to fill Curds spends most morni up an inch.Then spread that time ngs customers will be ordered to further cut their water use. The out over a week," Curtis told Ca- By afternoon, people on the street. percentage of the cut will climb it the reservoir continues to sey. ph afternoon, she is working the drain. phones, coaching people into only "I don't have the time to do that. servatigs She is mandatory out only Penalties: Those who ignore the measures could r t fined That's why I hired a gardener e warnings this mandatory radon- $700 per violation and cited for misdemeanors. Their taps Casey said."You people should be ing starts this week.After that,re- could be shut off after a healing. able to tell us how to do this." peat offenders could face citations. To report a Problem: The city has hired a"water cop"to "I'd like to be able to have a So far, everyone Curtis has ap- investigate possible rationing violations. The telephone num- formula or something to help him, proached has agreed to turn down bee is498-9436. but we don't have the staff to figure the tap. all that out;' Curtis said later. Thursday, Curtis found a sprin- Source:city of sao ciamenle. Othemare findingiteasy mcom- kler that had been leaking about I Ply I only water every other day 100 gallons a day for several days anyway, and look how green my at the San Clemente Car Wash at 'It'll be fixed today;' Newlan Since May 1, residents who use yard is," said Bob Dunbar as he 1731 N. El Camino Real. said.Two hours later,an employee more than 650 gallons of water a weeded his lush garden. "I have She pulled manager Charlie was digging in the mud to find the day or businesses that sprinkle more flowers than just about any. Newlan away from the cash regis- problem. By Friday, the sidewalk more than 1 inch of water a week body, too. I know, I've looked. ter long enough to point out the was dry. on their landscaping have been "But we've been through this offending sprinkler and the telltale "So far,everyone has been good paying surcharges of up to 50 per- once before,"Dunbar.69,said,re- muddy trail the leak left as it about it:' Curtis said. "But they cent on their water bills. ferring to the last major drought in spilled down the sidewalk and onto should be. If they don't fix these Residents already have cut their 1973."Back then they told us not to the street. leaks, they'll pay for it." wateruse,conservingabout 11 per flush the toilet so often." �.r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Name of Pacer Section Page Date I Subject A9i/-y 10114T Iq J 6-/V- 74 W,175R zAai 7p?6� Water shortage FOUNTAIN VALLEY HUNTINGTON BEACH 1.City swvk a.Fountain 1.So.Cal. S.Golden L Mle Square Valley N.S. Edison Co. Westx:oliege hurts no Golf Course 7.RIP Ine. L McDonnell 7.Shod OH L Mile Square &O.C. Douglas, S.Harbor Lights one/ yet Pak SwuGreen OSG &Seaditr 9. Huntington. A Desid Baker S.Green Valley Country Club by-theses Golf Course Rae.Cant. a.O.C. 10. Huntrngton By BOB VAN E KEN S. Los Amigos 10. F.V.Comm. Sanit Dist Cant. o+y n sun wm.. H.S. Hospial. 5. Weser lndc COSTA MESA — Water, war" _ everywhere. That's the way it's alwayys been, even here in and IRVINE AREA NEWPORTBEACH Soulhem California. 1.OTom &Royalty 1.City services a.Bluffs But az Orange County,along with Marine Base Carpet - L N.B. Homeowners the rest of California, weathers its 2 Tustin Hell- 7.Radiwed Country Club 7.Manetl Hotel fourth consecutive year of drought, copier Station Intl. a.Cakwood S.Hoeg Mom cities and other big water consumers f are taking steps to limit water use. 0-ucl 8.Parker Apartments Hospital And so far, users aren't finding it 0' <.Kendall Honnafin a.Big Canyon 9.Four Sessions, too painful IsicGew 9.Laidaw Gas Country Club Hotel "A couple of years ago, the city 5. American Rec.Systems S.Hughes 10.Pink manager asked all departments to M,p 10.Diceon Aircraft Newport undertake as many water conserva- tion measures as possible," said Joe Amnaga,deputy director of munici- pal servcies for the city of Laguna ' +; Water faCtS Beach. "in our parks and beaches, we've replaced all shower heads with .For the largest eat.users along the Orange Coast,such as the El low volume heads. We've put -,E Toro Marine Base and the Tustin Helicopter Station,the numbers are reaaerators on all faucets in our public - flow. We' to cut down on water minion gallons For instance,eeach the Marine base used an average of 1.44 flaw. We've installed moisture lens- million gallons of water each day last year. In comra.,the average -_ ing systems in our parks, so the �. tlonreetic water customer In me area used about 265 galloon per day spnnklers don't come on unless rt's r during the same period. necessary. Overal4 we've ban able .After municipal and manufacturing customers,the biggest water -- to cut water use 30 percent over last ye consumers in met dries are the hotels,motels and other hospitality year . In Newport Beach, city officials industries. are asking residents percent, a cut their water use by 10 peR/Ba utilities EORORS NOTE:Thee sty otOm®Mean eeNredm9nean O'mga Cpui Derry Piet (Please see WATER/Back Pagel rhp,mnaliu otme aryl cop waW otxa. WATER the last major drought, brought leaks immediately, she added. From Al about a 20 percent reduction in For the long term, many large water use throughout the city, he water consumers are looking at the director Bob Dixon mid. said. use of reclaimed water for imgmion. To increase public enthusiasm for In Huntington Beach, a recent Treated wastewater—not safe for water conservation, the city has in- City Council resolution also wiled drinking but suitable for watering itiated a small incentive. for voluntary water conservation, parks and golf courses — is already "There are some math in the city water department spokeswoman available in many areas. Daily said program, in that we're charging a Linda Daily said. the city is negotiating with the Or. surcharge for water use above 10,000 "We're encouraging such things as ange County Water District for con. gallons a month," Dixon said. "It's pool and spa covers and automatic structure of a reclaimed water pipe- no[ much. It's an extra one cent a shutoff valves for hoses," she said. line to the city. gallon above.10,000. But at least "We're asking the fire department And Newport Beach officials plan people know it's there." not to do fire Bow testing at to take the issue to the streets this And Dixon said the city is trying hydrants unless it's absolutely summer. to practice what it preaches. necessary and we're asking that fire Later this month, Dixon sari "The city itself is aiming for a 15 training that consumes water be held employees will go door to don. percent reduction," Dixon said. to what's necessary for public safe- packets of information about r." The rationale is thn since we're ty." residents can save water. The 10 the biggest consumer,the city should Leaks from sprinklers and faucets percent reduction can be achieved serve rouse as an example." arc the leading use of water waste, simply through common sense Similar measures in 1977, during Daily said. Residents should repair measures such as fixing leaks. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Name of Pacer section Page Data 1 Subject Ti�+1 ES E I -(,- 90 Wl,"MR e0A15ERYf9i710 / Waste- Not Water Savers Have Taken Up Cause With a Vengeance,Turning Vigilante in the Proce: By PA17 MORRISON From a car phone on the freeway. From a citizens have told the Department of Wet. TIMES STAFF WRITER sidewalk in Echo Park—tarn it off. and Power.I'll find water-wasters for you This is at varimca with the detached. What is going on here? ame your crisis. This one is drought meekness that urban life enjoins.Not since the The drought is at the edge of a commun Common wisdom holds that crisis anu-smoking rage have people felt so free. morality, shared responsibility for a share brings out the best in us,and the worst felt obliged to lecture: resource. What is mars astounding is that it brings us Someone who would rather dine naked than Says Harvey Molotch, an environment out at all. challenge the parents of a baby squalling at sociologist at UC Santa Barbara, In Las Angeles,city of elusive eye contact, the nmr,table.who woWd endure hearing lass "It's hard to walk up to another hum: when an injudicious lane change may get you before daring On ask the man in the next lane being who is a neighbor and who is decei murdered, the unspeakable is being spoken. to turn down his car stereo. feels sufficiently legitimate folk—and someone standing writt the undoable is being done. deputized by community welfare to tell neigh- garden hose is almost by definition Ozae' Angelenos are saving water. They are also born.gardeners,stranger.that it's against the the ami=' able 19509 Tv neighbor O=e Y telling other people in do the same. From the law to hose down that driveway. son and say to that person. 'Cm commas second-floor window of a West I_& home. Just you give me an M card right-minded Please see WATER ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS tPa-14- 2 o3 Name of Pacer Seccn Page Owe Suciec: fi fl ES E 9- 6 -qd U/ATE p CONSe R✓fIT/O/✓ WATER . .you can't ttp them,neither,you mlwalks].'s but not he ran.tell Irus om- an't provoke people or you cat enl against Gar y. S pline."u. people need the disci- rn Anna Garay. Salvadoran- phine." horn gardener.( Candnued ft..El —Flank FYantino- 77. LA.na- ❑ ing to you about your behavior: tive,1 Issues beeped out in smaller ft's a real dilemma for people as to how you would respond W someone ❑ communities at town meetings you'd see doing something not in Drought can be marketed like a must be handled here among the public interest" World War H scrap drive. Ordi- strangers Enter Carmela Quinones narily. Americans don't fret about and her telephone.the DWP water ❑ shortage or crisis. Molotch says. conservation hot line. Most of the "WCve been very conuiovt of it, because "nothing much happens 50-plus callers a day are "quite especially lately. . . . They serve here in terms of threat. so there s upset" They have been cited by enter here when we play bridge. We really no urgency W pull together." the department's roving Drought- doWt think they ,should chance the "It's one of the few things that busters, usually for hosing down (uaterl plaster gut just refill them everyone could agree on in I.A.. driveways or sidewalks. "Like ev- (when the m empryl. Were after one cause."says Barbara Carlow.a eryone.when we get caught doing Ito stopthat1• USC psychology professor. "[Wa- something wrong," Quklonn says —Mrs.William D.Griffith. terl crosses political lines Every- Prouty,"it bothers them" Los Angeles native and Pacific one's concerned about the water. Once the caller realizes the cita- Palisades resident, at her Tuesday every socioeconomic group. For tion is not a fine but only a bridge group at the Wilshire Court- that reason I think it can be very warning. however, "that kind of try Club.] unifying." pacifies them . . . then they my. And, frankly,you may use cloth My neighbor has been hosing.' ❑ diapers and recycle soda cans and They turn in a lot of other people." Angelenos talk about water- shop for peace till the organically Quinones' other callers already saving like Scours terming their fed cows mine home,yet still doubt "feel very responsible'" about wa- ment badges "I use my dishwater deep down that you're making any ter. -They feel. 'I'm doing what I to water the lawn,and my washing kind of global difference. possibly can,and I can do a little bit machine water too.". . ."I'm tak. Modern life looks so vastly dis- more by making DWP aware of ing a mu of a thin-minute show- ordered. way beyond anyone's in- waste.' " So, pacing their own er. only doing very full loads of fluence.China needs reform East- streets.checking their own neigh- laundry." . . "Everyone at home ern Europe is a polluted sump. born,Quinones'regular call every is trying to go to the bathroom at Most of Michael Milken's E600-mil- couple of days.and drop a dune on the same time so you only flush bon titre may be tax-deductible. scofflaws. once:" . . "I don't feel I'm doing But water—now, that. you tell A downtown businessman drives as much as I could. but I feel I'm yourself.I can do something about. to the office with a note pad on the domgsomething.' "People do want to feel a per- seal. He tapes down addresses You, too, can score easy do- most sense of connection to the when he sees water burbling away gooder points.Put something in the environment." says Tom Graff. Ws untended. and phones them in. A toilet tank. take fast showers,limit attorney for the Environmental woman turned in her neighbor for watering—and instant model ciu- Defense Fund in Berkeley. the having tidal-flow sprinklers—the zen. The older woman who called organization that mediated an nerve!—when she won't even let the DWP to let it know she was agreement between Las Angeles her husband time out his glass doing her part by showering with and Mono Lake over Mono's water. after taking a drink of water. her husband just wanted to hear "And it you're an urban dweller. someone say. "good for you" The in LA or San Francisco or-her- ❑ DWP's new ad campaign slogan, ever• that connection tends to be When they peddle the gospel "Save Water—It's Easier Than kind of remote;you're remand-A of according to the city of Los Angel- You Thins."appeals less to mutual it(only] when there's a drought or es, they do it at a risk."Sometimes sacrifice than to personal conven- an earthquake.Nature has a way of they get cussed at and talked to ience. every now and then reacquaating pretty nary:'Quinones says of her itself with you Then it is son of callers ❑ real in a was wine aspects of living More motives are at work an 'And how, rm �n t. Quinones' phones than Agatha savmq wafer. 1 niristie could attend W. A man hate to say it,but when you go to the ❑ wroed in by a neighbor for hosing toilet,you dun':lush it all the ft.. "We always rake. f have down his driveway confesses. He - We set out 15 or 20 white gallon arthritis, knees and wrists. (Using did it, but"that guy was trying to buckets for rainwater.My wife saver waerl, it redly hurts your bones. gel back at me for something I did the wash rinse water,she uses it for Once we heard it (about the in the past"A landlord who fails on her plates. . . . 77tose 1peoplel on droughtl, we didn't tau water any repair a dripping faucet hops to it top of the hill, On we more eater more.. . . We used wrier sometimes when the DWP makes the request just washing out their trash an. before Ito hue driveways and side- tipped by a call from the tenant ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS FAy_ 3 a� 3 Name of Pace, S3�Oft Page date Subject / 6'G- 9 p 64//I T6t2 r oNSE-le v4 T/o.v makes them feel above it," Cadow 'y°s kidding• but 1 was serious. He eaid.'But hike my shower.' NeB,so - '- says.'One feels deserving of every does everyone else. I notice my drop of water•and the other Ifeels] neighbor hosing things. Luting the the right to police . . . if You put kids let the water run. They say, those two personalities together •Well, I can't watch the kids all the you have quite a shouting match." time., Resentment comes from int- A ml so the telephone voices sing lido posit. They know, tWre in the with annoyance. "angry because they have made it a point to install "rang' low-flow shower heads"—and oth- —Victor Halys.36.church a m- em have not. Quidones says. The cal director. washing malathion off _ voices sear with venom—one his 14-year-old Saab: he sold his young man snarled."It's my water newer diesel car because it po0ut- Jand.as long as 1 pay my bill.you're ed too much.[ -*_- not gonna tell me how to use it" ❑ ❑ -3- ' "If were really going through a The risk: A public belabored by drought Look m Disneyland worthy causes may be scolded into the voter(=I Pirmes of the Caribbe- indifference. With good intentions an How,about Roping Waters?They or bad.a legion of those who"turn must use tons of water a day. Why in People or go snitch on (the] 'I don't waste that much not start cutting thm?77 ey always neighbors:' can give environmen- talism a bad time." Graff says. ap water. I have one of those the tittle pea*who tine to an of tie ..Adversaries and sometimes apartment-1 don't that much water-saving devices. water. I have one of those water- friends think of environmentalists as kind of nannies." . I'm a little saving devices. . . . fin a little Go d about it,, but you've what can work, says Elliot conscientious about it, gotta tta wonder if iCs true or dot' Aronson. is getting people"to feel " but you've gotta wonder —German Alamo. 39. at the like hypocrites." carwash cleaning malathion off his Aronson is a psychology profes- If It's true of not.' white Toyota Corolla sin at UC Santa Cruz when"stu- GEAMIW atON50 dents are forever saving the ❑ whales and the redwoods and ev- Within those wide margins are erythin6" A waiter. upbraided last week individuals for whom drought is "Most of us fool ourselves into P one more worthy austerity for the thinking we're doing OK." being for serving unsolicited water. planet's sake• far their children's sensible about smoking, drinking• turned the topic to his advantage. sane They already recycle. They exercise.when we are not.he said. "Somebody told me I can call the already car-pool. They boycott Aronson's study found that of 80 police and report my landlord.He's veal and build solar. As a student, women heading for field house out there spraying down the grav- Moloch traveled with friends and showers after exercising, only el. Now. that's really awful" He the "Europe on $5 a Day" guide- those who were stopped en route• gazed off, engrossed in the happy book, "We got it down to 70 cents questioned about their water me fantasy of his landlord chastened (a day[. We got into competition. then asked to sign a petition say- and penitent. "Hey—I'd get my into who could live on the least." ing, "If I can do it you can do it." V Ws(rentl worth!" In Santa Barbara, many practice cut their shower length to 3.5 The only bounty for hydro-vigi- conservation as "an art form. how minutes• half as long as the other [antes is paid out in satisfaction. every nonce can be used" fairly students. Please•some ask Quin<.tes.call me boasting of dying peach trees. of "It got them to realize they were back and tell me what happened to lawns that look like bad haircuts. not practicing what they were the guy 1 turned in. That water-saving "is not due to preaching." Aronson says. "If you This is where it can:et ugly. policing," but "m people being allow people to realize their behay. Inevitably. some use dmight. very willing to iolice[hammlves." for is out of line with their beliefs. "to feel important."says USC pro- Molotch says: they change their behavwr." feasor Cadow. "People who need The "straight communications" strokes use this as a wa;- •^ feel from billboards and TV have "a good—I'm helping out the ervton- ❑ very short effect, if at ad We're merit. yet they also "need power talking about self-persuasion. _ and control" and "are probably "Thisisnotairll work. One or two peopL, it We're not giving them a lecture loving this." saying'you have to conserve water At the other end is someone won't work. [On a grouP business to be a good person:We're getung feeling "deprived" "They're feel- nip ta Phosmisl 1 heard one guy in them to persuade themselves they ing they don't need to conserve the shower for 10 or 15 minutes. f should be doing this" water• it's for someone else. That sami'Do you nm do this all the el I ORANGE CCUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS I 2 Name of Pacer Sea= Page owe Sualect "T r rvl E S E 1 -6 90 u/ArER 40A156e✓ATI0N " 'S When It Comes TIPS SHAVING (p Ceatfsaed from Ei The facial kind to Conservation omniscient beings whose voices Bronze medal Don't shave to he echo in our ears: "Turn off that shower. It adds time, and time is Go for the Gold made of money?" you think I'm water.Shave al he sink. made of money?" Silver medal: The old-fashioned way. in the razor, the sink with a razor,r, and TFIESHOWER don't let the water run. Fib the By PATT MORRISON basin. turn off the water and use TIMES STAFF warren Each minute in a gorgeous, that. Open-tap full-bore method steamy hydro-pummeling shower can use up to 20 gallons. Water-m- f you're reading this at breakfast.You uses about five gallons of water. baan method uses one gallon. may already have used close to 50 - Thus, a 10-minute shower uses as Gold medal,Go electric,Or grow gallon of water today. much as 50 gallons. a beard (Women: shave in the if you're reading this at dinner, make Bronze medal: Take shorter bath. go natural or suck with that 100. Enough to fill 20 of those bottles showers whatever non-shaving technique it that get delivered to your door. Silver medal,Take shorter show- is that just yanks the hairs out of This water comes out of a tap,and every ers and mitall a low-flow shower Your tells.) gallon could have traveled as far as 600 head which cuts the delivery rate miles before reaching your shower or by.half. meaning you could take a garden hose.Across the Sacramento Delta. 10-minute shower with 25 gallons THE TOILET maybe.Through several pumping stations. The DWP has mailed out 1.2 million four different lakes, down a couple of rivers. of them. and MWD agencies are A delicate matter. Personal aes- Anditcosts about aloth of a cent a gallon. sending a million more. Where's thetica figure into it. The general The Metro soiltan Water District had expected Yours? flush-less advice goes against years that by the year 2010. there would be 13.9 Gold medal, All the above.and a of incloctrmauon by the Tidy Bowl million people in its Southern Califorrtm service Navy-nyle "spit" shower, using man and iris ilk. Water experts area It is 1590,and already there are 15 million. the low-flow shower head's on-off advise that liquid waste can be Ask any one of those how much water he uses device.Get wet.turn off the water, flushed less often. Remember the Oh.10 or 20 gallons a day,he'll guess. soap yourself down, then rinse off. flushing guide used during the 1978 Four people in one house use.on the average- A push-button,on-off device keeps drought: 'Pooh do.Per,don L" 480 gallons a day.This is about how to use less of the water at a constant temperature Bronze medal, Install a displace- it. It combines the advice of the Department of so you don't get a new blast of cold ment device in your tank Older Water and Power, the MWD, and those sundry water. This technique could use as toilets—more than 10 years—may Plc, see TIPS.:E little as four gallons. The most use six or seven gallons per flush Patient and virtuous can stop up the Displacement reduces that by a dram, then bad out the water for half-gallon. The DWP handed plants or washing car.Or take a cue these out by the thousands, too. from the Glendora 6-year-old who, Apartments and businesses are al- after his father explained the sol- ready required to have them.Limit emn new limitations imposed by other flushing,as well."You should drought. said: "Does that mean 1 not use the toilet for a trash can;' don't have to take a bath every says DWP's George Martin."if you night?., kill a spider, you don't put it in the r.. CHANGE CCUNTY SANITATICN DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Z &( Z Name of Pacer Semcn I Page Date Suclec: —i ! int ES 1 6'b-90 l�✓`J7�R GOVSfR✓ oN Ti.os toilet and flush it down.You wipe it gallons. Besides,lawns mean lawn mowing, up with a Kleenex and throw it in Gold medab The above tech- and even the fairly toothless city the trash ran." toque, then using the so-called ordinance prohibits hosing down Silver medal: All of the above, "gray water' on flower beds or to dmeways and sidewalks. In their with a lower-flush 35-gallon tank scrub down a porch or deck Phos- first week on patrol. Droughtbus. To go one better, set the plunger phorous in the soap"ends up acting tars issued 195 citations. You have lower.The metal arm with the hall like a mild ferdizer," says MWD to sweep up the mess by hand. on the end is flexible. Bend it—the spokesman Tim Surove. Bronze medal: Water before 10 further the hall sits into the tank. a.m.or after 5 fi a Otherwise.half the Ito water it takes to register as LAUNDRY the water evaporates and never "full" (Some have sliding adjust. reaches the roots. When you do ers.) Bronze medal: Beating your `eater the lawn, water deeply and Gold medal: The ultra-low flush clothes on racks at the I..A. River. infrequently, perhaps once every toilet which uses 1.6 gallons and is A noble but fruitless gesture. uurd day.Grass is trainable. Water already required in some new con- Silver medab Washing a full load potted plants as needed. not just struction.Install one and get a$100 on regular cycle can ate became you're watering the grass re bate. p gallons. A. short to fill us "water-saving'. at the same lime. Make sure spnn- cycle and a minimum water level liters are spnnkling grass, not BRUSHING TEETH use perhaps 27 ga0om. Better to pavement- do five full loads than 10 half loads. Silver medal, Don't have some Simply stated: Do root leave the Gold medal: The above, and re- silly.fragile Fast Coast grass;get a water running. A two-minute plumbing or simply unhooking the hardy California lawn. once a brushingwith the water going full discharge line and rigging it to a Srxove waters his Bermuda once a 6 g bore m week. "You could save (up tol 350 old use up to 10 gallons. It cistern or a sturdy trash can with a gallons just by eliminating one you just wet your brush. turn off coupler and a base m the gray irrigation cycle any day you don't the water,and rime,a two-minute water can be used as described brushing can use as little as two above. wateryourlawn." quartz. AT WORT( Gold medal,Re-landscape for the ;rensrape. Native.drought-tolerant WASHING DISHES plants save not only water but time. Not much flexibility here Un- They belong here; they know how Bronze medal: Not as you might flushed toilets probably are but to take care of themselves. think for eating out A restaurant apprectated. When washing hand& must use four glasses of water to wash hands."instead of shooting the WASHING CAR clean every glass of water poured bull with somebody and letting the At home. an automauc dishwasher water run:' says DWP's Martin. That most visible and idmating a: washing by hand when you let Rather.Yammer at management to offense.an unchecked hose.rem at the nature water run can we 15 to 30 save.save,save. seven to 10 gallons a minute-70 to ga0om. Don't run the dishwasher 100 gallons, while you're scrubbing except with a full load WATERING away at a spot of pigeon spoor. Silver medal: A short cycle on a Bronze medal:Turn the water off fully imded dishwasher can use as If you wanted your two to look after wetting down the car. Wash- little w seven gallons. Washing like the back nine, why didn't you ing with a bucket and a hoae nine dishes by filling the sink or a buy a house on the IOth green at can use as little as 20 gallons instead dishpan can use as little as five Augusta. Ga.? This is a desert. of up to 150. Silver medal: A recycling car wash may use 20 or 30 Wins, to wash yours.but recycles all but 5 or 10 gallons of it Gold medal: The malathion look—go with it"Or you can buy a brown car," says Scrove. "and no one will nouce." ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Name of Pacer SecScn Page Date Iva. vG roN BsAG/f Subject yAic y A 6 - i- 9 a wise .4Ano y/NG Water rationing . considered By ROBERT BARKER depending on how much water is ry's underwater basin. where Hum- used. Beach gets about 70 percent HUNTINGTON BEACH —City Water Superintendent Leff Retina of its water, is lower [han nortnW water officials are weighing tough said Thursday he hopes that a 10 after four dry years. But it's still measures — including mandatory effec[n n 7W voluntary cutback can take better[han a was during the 1976-77 water rationing — if the bonedry Y drought and it's not critical at this drought continues for a fifth straight If it's successful and another vol- point, he said. year and voluntary cutbacks fail. um my 10 percent cutback is Renna's plan, which will eventu. achieved in 1991, then residents ally be considered by the City Coun- Proposals call fbr a per-capita might avoid the more drastic steps, cil, calls for water conservation in Limit on water use,a possible ban on be said three phases: outdoor rlandscape anshames for repeated offerrd Ilium No water reduction measures are *Phase I calls for 10 percent now in effect in the dry. savings by voluntry reductions. Ir- and an increase in residential rates, Rentra said water in Orange Coun- ni tion times at 8a residences, golf courses and government and com- -Phase III would put a cap on WATER mercial facilities would be regulated per-capita ase, and pressure would a Phase II calls for mandatory be reduced on the entire water sys- From AI cutbacks in irrigation, street clean- tem when possible. There would be to meet the demands of Bouthnem hrg, car washing and all discre- a strict enforcement of penalties and donary uses. Violators woWd re- a limit on permits for hydrants and California through 1990." Renna env written warnings, house calls. war" trucks used for grading or said in a drought update. "The supp- Bow restrictions, financial penalties cleaning. ly for [991 is uncertain. and ultimatelyy, would have their The typical family uses about "Even if this coming winter brings service shut off.The use of hydrants 11,000 gallons ofwater a month and above-avenge precipitation. water and water trneks would be dus pays a bimonthly bill of S26.60, shortages will continue. The best couraged unless reclaimed water is Rennes said. wav to ensure adequate supplies for used and higher costs would be "Them should he sufficient water the next few years in Huntington required for excessive use. (Please see WATER/Bade Pa,al Beach is through a coordinated water conservation elTom" ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Name of Pacer section Page Date CF'1:[:aEJjaJ oRL2�� �','A7c A:>E.VGi ES TO c.�; wry�F_n LLSE /rflc S ff V3 �5-.,77 101 SACRAMENTO Cut Water Use 10%, Deukmejian Orders Gov. George Deukmejian or- dered all state agencies and de- partments to curtail water use by at least 10% to leave more for farming and firefighting. "As bad m things we in the state this year. we must also prepare for the possi- bility of a fifth straight year of drought' Deukmejian said in his weekly radio address."If we do not conserve this year, net year we may have more severe water ra- tioning. higher water prices and increased adverse economic and environmental consequences:' Eris executive order directs department managers to seek ways of saving water, such as repairing leaks. limiting landscape irrigation.limit. ing washing of state cars and windows. eliminating washing of sidewalks and driveways and turn- ing off decorative fountains. The drought, now in its fourth yew. is etpected to hurt farmers. particu- larly in the southern San Joaquin Valley.and cause losses in wildlife, fisheries and water-oriented rec- reation.he said. From Times Staff and Wire Reports UHANUI:: UUUN I Y SANI IA I IUN UIJ I hit, 1 7 NEWSPAPER CUPPiNGS Name of Paper Section Page Owe Subject RFGiSTrR A / 5- 00- 90 ORouGHT- Ruauc o�iNi� Dry spell hits home in California, poll_ shows California residents believe an adequate supply of Agencies to measure the opinions of people on water is the Second most critical problem in the water,also found that half the state's residents state today,after illegal drugs,according to a new are suffenng a water shortage due to the statewide survey by the Field Institute.The survey, four-year drought and 85 percent think conducted for the Association of California Water the water shortage Is serious statewide. 0011.1 81 percent feel the state water Four in 10 described water quality as a shortage is serious enough to .� critical issue.Sixty-four percent were warrant new dams and _ Confident that the tap water in their reservoirs. Forty percent said it homes was of high quality for drinking was"very urgent' to build new Lam_ I I However, hall of those surveyed said water projects,or 11 percent they routinely drank battled or filtered more than when a similar water because it tested better. survey was taken in 1987. Most people consider conservation a At least 70 percent believe future primary source during water water shortages,better water shortages. Fewer than one in 10 saitl quality,population growth and a reduction of 25 percent in the economic development are good 11MV amount of water used would reasons for building new constitute a serious hardship and is facilities. something they could not do. The association's a00 members represent 90 percent of the public agencies that distribute water in California.The survey of 1,100 residents was taken by telephone Sources:MCCImNy tram March 27 M April 6 and was cc-sponsored by 25 other public and private News service,me _ organizations.The pall has a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points. Audoutterl Prass Paul Carrie and Steve CowdemThe Orange County eeglsler ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Name of Pacer Section Page oat% 0,017,041 q L- Subject REGISTER Z l _ 5-6-9D GUATEQ �O� fTiGs A ration of power Los Angeles Mayor Tom Bradley's deci- water through the most efficient mecha- sion to impose mandatory water ra- nism humankind has yet devised to allocate tioning suggests strongly that much of scarce goods and services — flexible pric. what we hear from public officials about ing.People might pay current rates for up to drought has less to do with saving water 10 percent below 1986 usage (or whatever than with increasing government power and target level is chosen), with the price per intrusiveness. Not only did Mr. Bradley's unit rising sharply after that. Those who decision come in the face of a statement conserve especially well—reducing usage from the Department of Water and Power to 20 or 25 percent below 1986 levels, say— that the city will have adequate supplies of might get a discount. water through December, but the mayor After a few months,with just a fraction of chose an intrusive, divisive scheme when the publicity surrounding a mandatory less intrusive and almost certainly more ef- scheme with fines and snitches, people fective alternatives are available. would adjust their water-using habits. The We can only hope that Orange County levels at which prices break could be adjust. agencies have the capacity to learn from ed periodically if goals aren't being met. Los Angeles's mistakes. Instead of being encouraged to inform on or Mayor Bradley's plan still requires ratifs- turn to wasteful neighbors, people would cation by the City Council, so some details merely know they were paying through the may change. As proposed, it would require nose for [heir bad habits. all houses and businesses to cut their water Go aren't crazy about ration- use to 10 percent below 1986 levels or face mg throughrough price in part because such a fines of up to 75 percent of a two-month system works quietly and efficiently, with water bill.The mayor wants a ban on water- little need for intrusion or posturing from ing lawns between 10 a.m.and 5 p.m.and an officials. If the pricing is done intelligently, increase in the price per billing unit that there's no need for officials to go on TV to would cost most households about$3.24 ex- remind us of our responsibilities, or make me each two months. public examples out of careless users. Pen- The plan will probably reduce water us- pie would simply look at their water bills age,but at a high price in money and social and decide whether their habits are worth h dislocation.It i encourage people to turn the additional cost. Most people would con. their neighbors in to the "drought police" serve, even 7 most Americans conserved fuel in the and pay inordinate attention to other pea- many government officials have when prices rose sharply, But too maany ple's business. It will rely to a great extent on moralizing and stigmatizing,which tend the notion that"leadership" means making Peoplesuffer,imposing conspicuous to divide people and make them hostile. Ver- men ts,and being visible while doing so.o.Ver- Abetter way to conserve water is to ration ily they have their reward. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CUPPINGS Name of Paper Section Page Data n Subject REGISTER A 6 5-6-90 D O!(6HY iti OPAV$E Lo[n� AS The Orange County Register Sunday, May 6, 1990 r [rJ • . . Some residents cut consumption, but rationing looms as possibility By Enrique Rangel On Tuesday, the Fullerton City The Orange County Register Council asked for a voluntary 10 66 We hope to avoid that percent cutback, City manager (rationing). We Still think Like many Orange County resi- Bill winter said. - dents.Raymond and Grace Zerger The council asked residents not that people are going to like to water their lawn frequently, to water their lawns from 10 a.m. respond. 59 particularly on warm days. to a p.m., not to let the hose run Dim Vuong Until recently,the Fullerton cou- when washing a car or doing Anaheim water engineer ple watered it every other day. chores, and for restaurants not to Now they only water it every three serve water unless customers re- days for no more than 10 minutes quest rt. day to reduce water consumption at a time. Raymond Zerger said. • It's coo early to say how it's by 10 percent. In addition. they wash clothes going to work:' Hinter said. If that doesn't work, the city only when they have a full load,not The city will have a better idea in might have to start retioning water daily as they used to.Grace Zerger 30 or 45 days when water bills are by July. Vuong said. said. monitored. Buena Park. Huntington Beach Fullerton has recommended that If voluntary compliance does not and Placentia also are planning to residents reduce water consume work,the city will consider ration- ask residents voluntarily to reduce tion and backed it up with the ing, he said. water consumption and perhaps threat of rationing this summer. Fullerton is not the only commu- impose ranching if no one pays at- "I hope it doesn't come to that;" nity considering water rationing. tench. Grace Zerger said as she inspected Cities such as Anaheim. La Ha- the lawn's automatic-sprinkler bra and San Clemente,which have But officials and residents said system. "I think we are all doing also asked for voluntary reduction they hope that won't be necessary. our share to avoid wasting water. on water consumption, might do -I am very careful how l use it;' From La Habra to San Clemen. likewise. said Reyna Fagen.a La Habra res. te, a growing number of Orange ident. as she hosed her little rose County cities are asking residents "But we hope to avoid that;'said garden next to the sidewalk. voluntarily to reduce their water Dim Vuong,Anaheim's waterengt- g consumption by 10 or IS percent. neer. 'We still think that people ••I used to water my lawn just Four years of below-average are going to respond." about every day." Fagen said. rainfall in Southern California has Like Fullerton,the.lumheim City "Now 1 do it no more than three water reserves running low. Council asked residents on Tues. times a week.That's all it needs." ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS `lame Gf Pacer Secdcm Page, Doe Subject R&6fsTrR A � 5-6 -ga DRouGHT This time, drought warnings are in earnest, officials say By Gary Robbins The MWD admitted it erred and Alina Tugend ■ SAVING:Some conserve Wa- badly in 1984 when it said the six The Orange County Register ter, but rationing still possible/6 Southern California counties it You've been hearing the warn- increasingly dire forecasts being serves—including Orange Coun- ing for weeks: made by the region's chief water ty—woWd have plenty of water Four consecutive years of supplier,the Metropolitan Water through 1995, even if the region drought have greatly depleted District of Southern California? suffered the on of devastating Southern California's water sup- No. And yes. drought that hit the state in 19,6- plies. Mandatory cutbacks are Despite a track record of Ti. imminent. If the drought contin- sometimes overly shrill rhetoric Carl Boronkay, MWD's has e h ues, hundreds of thousands of and alarmist predictions. this al manager,also has said he has people will lose their jobs. time the drought warnings are been using outdated figures in But can the public believe the serious. Please see WATERO Orange County ads atop a vast aquifer that officials Ground water Orange County compare to an underground lake. h reaches depths of basin special reserve 4,000 feet and=matrix millions of gallons of water. Muneiy s Ground water " N a basin arm aa° A. .o -toad n. to I N Nonwatar- beadng -aeaa n. clay An aqugar is a rack layer that hells water in largo amounts. daoon Water-baedrtg Water a=mulates and is contained in the pore spaces of sandy shah rock The OC water basin area contains both water-bearing j sandy shales and non-water-bearing clay areas. iou2e:Oranga pounry Waw Dsn6 EMye" -9namxa Nsm N9WMMOnrga Cd/mY ayMr ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Name of Paper Secticn Page Date Sume t WATER: OC better supplied than other areas FROM t predicting the financial effect on year from one of its three main cy's other main sources of water, the area if the drought continues. sources of water,the Colorado Riv- the Sierra Nevada.The mountains And some water officials say the er Aqueduct.One acre foot is equal usually provide twice as much run. MWD has misled the public into to 326.000 gallons of water — off. thinking the simation is desperate enough to supply two homes for one The shortfall means Southern everywhere,when it's far less seri. year. California might get only 1.1 mil- ous in places such as Orange Coun- MWDis use of Colorado River lion of the 1.4 million acre feet of ty,which has lots of groundwater, water has been cut back because water it wants to bring south this particularly in the north and cen. Arizona,for the first time;is exer year from Northern California tral portions of the county, cising its legal right to increase its through the so-called State Water Stan Sprague, general manager take from the river. Arizona will Project. of the Municipal Water District of take an even a larger percentage of ■ For the fourth straight year, Orange County, the county's larg- water from the river in the forme Southern California has received est water agency,said many water as a new distribution system is only about half of its normal rain. officials have a credibility problem brought fully on line. fail, increasing the region's de, because they have painted dooms- The change could mean that mend for imported water. Rain is day pictures once too often. MWD's annual take from the river the agency's third major source of "I won't yell wolf again until I will fall to S50,000 acre feet, from water. need to say we really have a prob. 1.2 million.That would deprive the ■ The MIND is being asked to lem," said Sprague, who told The district of enough water to supply supply water to more new custom. Orange County Register in 1984 he 1.2 million homes. As it is, MWD ers than anticipated. The popula- overstated water-shortage prob. this year is losing enough water to lion in the six counties the MWD lems then in an effort to get people supply 400,000 homes. serves — Orange, Los Angeles, to conserve. ■ The city of Los Angeles, Riverside,San Bernardino-Ventu- And yet. ... which once got only 10 percent of to and San Diego—has been grow. Some of the same skeptics who its water from MIND, this year be, ing by 300,000 to 400,000 a year. In have cast doubt on MWD in the gan relying on the agency for 30 1983.the agency projected that the past say this time there is good percent of its water. The city population would grow by 200,000 a cause to worry about water. And turned to MIND after a variety of year. they say the drought is only part of political, environmental and tech. "We didn't foresee all of these the reason. nmal factors corralled the amount problems," Boronkay said. "But Water officials note that the of water it has been piping in from we have them. People need to con, MWD,which supplies about half of the Owens Valley and Mono Basin. serve water in case the drought Orange County's water, has been ■ Because of below-average continues.We feel a 10 percent cut. hurt by several factors: snowfall, the MWD estimates that back is best. ■ The agency will receive only 8.1 million acre feet of water "I'll leave it up to individual ?00,000 fewer acre feet of water this will run off from one of the agen- communities to decide if they need ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CUPPiNGS Name of Paper Section I Page Oate Subject Sunday, May 6, 1990 The Orange County Register A7 Drying up mtlaa. aTMYr�Yeb�mbla�pa rnmaL�Ft W TaWamlMmw.ta.mar m f9J4aa i® 5a1,719 26.67 90at0 5m'm 25 tifffi� 524.3n 20 7.G8 ffi0]0 4%,Tm 574JIM Is a4as St1 ns a aSa6 592,n95 '9687 611,6a1 5 �"" _ Was, a:ia 2 p 4ae9 Mina) paceot ed mponeo.. 1�p Ile e`o.60 1711" 441'PIP.a� s't'� •tmeiomeaawmam.aao vaua+>_mm..mwm we M rao spas na�nanam ure e m as Yea. 6ourta:O an Count'wa,.fAsme Wm aguya *an Cm RNimm to impose mandatory rationing." ground reservoir that provides rely more on its groundwater,free- Orange County is somewhat bet- most of the water for the 2 million ing up imported water for south ter off than other regions because people in north and central Orange Orange County and other thirsty about half of the water consumed County. cities. here comes from a huge. natural The district says it can safely The region's reliance on import- underground reservoir in north- withdraw about 1 million acre feet ed water has led water officials west Orange County. of water from the reservoir. It has and government leaders through- "I don't think (there's) a crisis already taken out 400,000 acre feet. out Orange County to urge people or a problem this ,year, but as we Even with the reservoir, the 2 to cut their consumption by 10 per- begin looking to next vest we million people in that area rely on cent. should do what we can to conserve the MWD for about 30 percent of "That'd be enough to ensure we (in case the drought contines)." their water.And about 300,000 pen- got through next year OK, if the said William Mills Jr., general pie in south county get virtually all drought continues," Sprague said. manager of the Orange County Wa- their water from the agency. But he acknowledged that it could ter District. H the drought gets much worse, be difficult to persuade people to His agency manages the under. north Orange County might have to cut back voluntarily. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS LAd NEWSPAPER CUPFINGS Nan ea?_er Se=m 1I Page Oats Susie: Tm e /0 15-V/ qV !f wmoe CONSE,Q 1/ATiON� Southern California .Drought / . Forces More Conservation u Your editorial on water coraervation tips pasL) Additionally low-Bow milets and : •\� � ("If Only All of Us Would. . .; April 15) shower res[rictors have been itaWled My should be posted on every refrigerator and pas[Navy training of water hours has not V hose bib in Southern California! been forgotten. Just as important as residential comer- Some others have done none of these.To es / vation,however,are the contributions that now mandate a 109b amow-the-board cut can be made by local industry. Corpora- .simply penalizes the saves and rewards lions like Anheuser-Busch and ARCO are the wasters.The method utilized by Ven- l f\ r using recycled water In their industrial tun of 294 gallons per day based on a operations. Treasure Farms and Ventura four-personfamdyisfarmoreequmble. County's Lake Sherwood Country Club are Let fairness enter the picture, not an to watching their water.Even when water using reclaimed water for crop and turf easy admin atntive decision of a 10% supplies are normal,farmer are allotted a irrigation. reduction. certain amount from water projects and Lets make sure the companies. clubs, WORLEY C.and AUDREY JONES when it's used up they get no more. As a churches and other organizations to which Monwlmr result, California farmers are among the we belong practice conservation as a U only our Water Reclamation District moat efficient water users anywhere. lifestyle. would recycle the billions of gallons of In some ways California is lucky. Four JOHN K. FLYNN sewage treatment plant effluent we cur. years of drought would bring most stales to Ventura County Supervisor rently dump min the ocean, we wouldn't their knees. But more than luck it is our Chairman,Southern California have to worry about the piddling savings water management system that has en. Walar Commil[ee.Irvine you cite;we wouldn't be making a desert of abled es in weather this drought as well n • Your excellent editorial concerning the the Owens Valley; we wouldn't be chang- we have. As California continues to grow, water shortage stated, "If Only All of Us ing the ecology of San Francisco Bay and there is still room for our water system to Would. . "The two key words were"if we wouldn't be making the South Bay sea grow with it Even today,cities and farms a 1 Unfortunately, voluntarily reducing breeze redolent of septic sewage effluent combined use only 37%ofour runoff. water use is not enough. because many from the Inadequate primary (maybe) If we can break the policy gridlock over people either are uninformed about treatmentilnowrecerves. water in our sure.Californians can condn- Southern California's water crisis,or they H. DAVID COOPER ue to enjoy ample,high quality water.If we are indifferent. Huntington Beach don't break that gridlock,California's luck Driveways and sidewalks are still being Bill Kahr1§ drought column ("Water. may soon run out' STEPHEN K. HALL hosed down (usually by gardeners). even g though this is illegal.New team are being Water;' Opinion, April 29) shows some Executive Director planted Sprinklers at parks. along road- real insight into current draught attitudes California Farm Water Coalition ways, freeways and at commercial build- but mimes the point badly when it comes to Fresno ings are usually on timers,and some turn allocating shortages. on every night.Big corporations still water Kahrl's worst mistake comes when he as Whatever happened to the old idea of acres of lawns every night,with the excess picks up the now-familiar chant about seeding the clouds? With the drought we water draining into the gutters. California farmers getting too much water are experiencing 1 would think they'd try We need city/county rationing that is 'stole city dwellem have to do without everything to enhance the little drizzles strictly enforced, and we need it immedi- Kahrl acknowledgm himself that farmers we get.The heavy cloud coven that come ately,not at the end of the summer.Are we have Laken cuts of up to 50%. Isn't giving in off the ocean almost every night and going to wait until the water is nearly up half of their water supply enough? morning pass by California and drop their gone. like Santa Barbara did.and then be For most of us. cutbacks in water moisture over Texas and the southeastern forced to take drastic action? Where Is a supplies am,an inconvenience,at worst the U.S.,sometimes causing floods. Is there no leader.when we so desperately need one? lose of same landscaping.For some farmers way we can seed Lhese clouds before or as a 50%cut in water supply means a 50%cut they come over the coast and get them m OARY RMASTERS l in their paycheck.And it isn't just farmers drop some of that min here? either. One out of two jobs is related to MILLIE MARKS • Your editorial must be responded to as it agriculture in the Central Valley.For a lot Santa Monaca mentions a 10% cut in individual usage. of workers it'll mean a 100%pay cut We support a cut,bt.t not in percentages. Beyond the hardship to farmers and You listed several examp!a of low/high farm workers,we would do well to remem. gallon usage. We.using the Ir•r side,have ber that Californians enjoy the least expen. already cut 6,650 gallons per month. (I sive,best quality food in the world It takes must plead guilty to hosing the drive in the water to grow that food. In fact it takes over 4.500 gallons of water In grow and process one Californian's daily diet. Kahrl thanks public water systems ought �..� to serve the public. We agree, and when Californians put on a nice cotton shot or blouse.or when they sit dawn to eat,that's part of the bargain. So should California farmers conserve water?YOU her.Like all of us,farmers will have to get by on less during the current drought.The difference is farmers are used ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Name of Paper Seclim Page Date Subject Lf17i�Fs F} 3 5-3-90 LA Cp. A*re4 RtrIOA/in/G L.A. Mayor Urges Water Ration* 9 . _ Across the Southland ■Conservation: Bradley unveils a plan to require consumers to cut usage by 10'le. Other cities seem.unlikely to follow his lead. . ' _.biy and mlead others by our example" By FREDERICK M.Malt - is . But while Bradley is seeking to lead, and LANE FRf7SCH wateragencim scenes Southern California TIMES STAFF WRITERS - 5 said they are unlikely to follow. "We LOS ANGE'LES—Mayor Tom Bradley simply don't see such a drastic problem," on Wednesday proposed mandatory water said Keith Coolidge, spokesman for the i Municipal Water District of Orange Coun- 1 me has I nine tin hasing throughout the city, saying the come for I:os Angeles to Set an ty, echoing the response of many other example for all of Southern California in agencies that are sticking with voluntary coping with a projected 10%.shortage in eweervation programs. water Supplies this year. . Bradley asked the City Council for quick passage of his water conservation ordi- "Fear among water agencies that con- snde,which would assess heavy financial servation measures will somehow deny penalties on those who we more than their them their rightful share of water has allotments Bradley's proposal would re- paralyzed our region into.inaction;"Brad- quire consumers in cut their usage by 10% ley said."We have a duty to act responsi-. from 1986 consumptiunlevels or face fines. The mayor,who earlier asked consumes cities that refuse to conserve benefited among the myriad water agencies in the W voluntarily cut their use by l09b,said he from Los Angeles decision W manage its region, said Richard Atwater, general is seeking rationing because"it is clear we resources responsibly,"Bradley wrote in a manager of the Central Basin Water Dis- mmt do more." letter sent Wednesday to the city's eight trict, which represents 40 communities;In ,.We must save as much water as representatives on the 51-member MWD coastal and southern Los Angeles County. possible in the peak summer months," Board of Director. "But we want to defer the individual Bradley said. The initial response from the MWD and decisions to each city." Reaction from the City Council on several of its member agencies—including Carl Boronkay, general manager of the Wednesday was generally favorable, with .San Diego, Long Beach, Burbank and MWD, said Los Angels representatives all but one of the 14 members contacted Compton—was cool. we welcome in make their argument for voicing some level of support for the "I thirst it needs to be proven that we mandatory rationing to the full board,but rationing measu re. mono[ reduce water we voluntarily, be- he questioned how enthusiastic the re- .Bsdlev said he also will ask the Metro- fore we go to a mandatory system," said spouse would be. "I would Resume that podium Water District,which supplies 60% Ronald Palmer, general manager of the many members would want to see how of the water for 300 communities from Foothill Metropolitan Water District, they are doing under newly commenced Mexico to Venture, to require cities in its which serves seven smaller water agencim. fvolwdwYl programs" before endorsing a service area to adopt similar mandatory in the San Gabriel Valley. "We don't feel mandatory rationing plan,Boronkay said. rationing plane.The MWD has projected a we should go to mandatory. . .we feel'the "We take our lead from MWD."said Dan " 10% to 12%shortage in water supplies this people will respond"to calls for voluntary Davis,general manager of the Long Beach year. cuts in Water me,he said Water Department "So far, the feeling "It would be unfortunate and unfair if "Wealso want to encourage uniformity" Plena see WATER,A83 unruvr�c uuury i f QA141 I A HUN UIJ I hill;I J NEWSPAPER CUFFINGS Name of Pacer S== Page Oate SuCjec! `� n WATER loco Flares said ins believe the are bigger dAl others," Couneil- `/,/L•'11 L't Iime has came m institute ration- men RicharCouncilman Braude p Water Wicials an,nmd � d. Councilmen Braude predicted amale their daily howehofd Cnndnod gram M But y have members as end the that the council will g. "Weelm- t va 1hei ti&it owehow. from Me[ u that there will be Pin my have b be amended b inBlY approve rationing. "We five Paw I,eB k to be more tean 5d enough.water b get ua through be include special an other far low- b a dinar he said"To rake out e a. to]5 sallow,a dog. Offkia4 all income people and other hardship waletle conservatanceion by doing some actual doily utter me summer and the rest at the „ V water conaervatian now is the best )tom J00 hi ise salbna a ties. year. . . .We cannot enact a man: •y think there has b be an appeal Investment that a prudent society are ovem le a.sis of datory program without a Proper prepay built into it.Some families should make:' vim fm rmmman hovxhold announcement of a severe water - -- sommons shortage from the Met" Councilwoman Joan Mllke Fla- &uahingterN - res.chair of the Commerce.Moir 3 gellwnaaay and Natural Resources committee, which oversees water matters also questioned the need for rationing. at.his time. Shower findoutwhatlnforms- so gallons, menu as don the mayor hall that led w this detiaion, she said "The DWP is who should is Li us [if rationing Is gap, needed(and I don't thick we've got - 20 gallons thatinformation Yet" _ ® Fbegi said her committee will Toilet L'begin hearings on Bradley's 28 gallons a day per proposal next week The legislative parson process could take about a month to complete. ® We should make our decision weaning doMa e on We facts and that is whet my as gallons a load committee will do on Tuesday," Flares cold.. ® Jim Wicf the assistant general Cooking manager of the Department of 5 gallonsaday Witter and Power, do that bated supplies, dies, consumptions hda en water consery neffort cote are mMwgyiw should ve[Ide efforts, There IS gellomaloed throug t adequate water a get through this year."- ® But the fourth quickrthy Wade"We are ianaacape also inane fourth yen of a draught MO gallons per and have a greet need bran- . wa[enngday throe Whether we do that through judgment voluntary mandatory u[meam] a udgmentt calll.for the dxaway mayor and the City Council. t W vio 50 gaaons Wickner went c would not say whet his judgment Flores' would es Ds prop sal questions.Bred- CnwrNng the Cry Coual has in sad support on 15o galbro theeI t[Y k it's a ' 0 y [hW[it's appropriate ate that the city Loa Mis a assume the . so aweaegn wewownnsoan.m enMarvin aleadership b this eras•' Council- men The Braude said. The Times was able to connc.l/ of the counN'a 15 member.mdaLL UltiF NUN: UUUN IY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CUPPINGS Name a Pacer Seaian Page Oats Subiecl R�GiSTFA � / 5-3-90 I VOLUNTARY IVIMW f,9r10AVA16 WATER: LA OC seeks proposal is voluntary much stricter water cuts FROM t steps its 29 member agencies can take to voluntarily reduce their water usage by 10 percent. By Anna Tugend "We're asking them to work on The Orange County Register internal water management."said Orange County which sits atop a Keith Coolidge, a spokesman for huge supply of ground water,is not the Municipal Water District of Or- likely to follow a proposal by Las ange County.'M1Vewan[themroget [heir own house in order." Angeles' mayor Wednesday for Tuesday night, the Fullerton mandatory water restrictions,offs- City Council called for a 10 percent No ca said. voluntary cut in water usage From onetheless, some parts of Or- its residents,Sears said.A number ange County are being sageasked ro per- of other Orange County cities are antato cut water usage by al per- expected to follow with their own cent to cope with Southern nought, resolutions.ma's worsening drought, • If you compare Orange Cowry authorities said. with the rest of the state, we're in The suggestions for cutting back much better shape." said Jim Van range from shorter showers to less Haan,a spokesman for the Orange landscape watering, said Lam 'County Water District. Sears, a water-system engineer About 2 million residents in Or- with the city of Fullerton. ange Cowry's north and central None of the propposalsosals are regions get most of their water strict Bradley's Los Angeles Mayor Tomm from an underground lake or aqm- datoryconselWednesdayforman- fer containing millions of gallons of datory conservation measures for water from Santa Ana River rum his city. The initiative, which the off, Van Haan said. city council still must approve, But about 400,000 residents who would require all water customers live south of Irvine get much of to cut use by ID percent from 1986 their water from the Metropolitan levels. Water District,which has called on Also Wednesday, the Municipal its member agencies to voluntarily Water District of Orange County— cut its water usage by 10 percent. which supplies water p most of MWD provides half of the water south county — approved outlines needed by 15 million people in Or- droughtacPleseseon Plan"ehatTER/ ange,LosAngeles,Riverside,Ven- Pleaze see WATERHB turn,San Bernardino and San Die- go counties. 0W4TER:Mayor Bradley calls for Orange County officials said that tougher restnctions118 while voluntary rationing may be- come more commonplace,they do -- - - not expect to see any Los Angeles- type measures implemented here soon,but added that much depends on the length and severity of the drought. "I don't see mandatory water ra- tioning in Orange County, at least not this year,' Van Haun said. " 1991 may be a different scenario." ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEnSPAPER CUPPINGS Name of Pacer Sedan 'age Dale Suclect D�liw /l�oT / S 3 90 DPouGur Commentary Gimme of time water religion By WIWAM I(AHRL and without adding any major new this time around. And that's ap founder goes to i^dustnal. com. California this vear enters its smnge reservoin 10 the water sys• propriale because agriculture. the Outdid. and governmental uses. worst dmoghl sfnce the near tern az a whole. Is Itself a testament slate's larger,water user,enjoys a lot Roughly half of me aloe percent felt smaren summer of 1977, But while to how skilled California's wame mom flexibility m the way it usn over that goes to people's housesns the natural conditions are similar, officials have become at managing Nose supplies in= most of the rest used outdcon.That means that only some other things have changed — life resource ethcienly. But if the ofher sate. If farmers have to make about four percent of all the warm in pan az a function of government evidence that we're piling more do with Ins water or lower quality we have developed(the numbers am polity in pen az a matter of so- experienced at dealing wM drought suppin. that may mean that they lower the melropolisao ngionsbf titude. As a mutt the familiar has fobbed the current water crisis have to pump more, or they can Southern California) actually winds chorus of municipal appeals for of some of its urgency, It is also true choose m grow different cm",or in up being used to the home.And yet water nmervatlon and rationing that conditions generally are not some im,ancn they may just alter Itsthem,wherewelive.thatgovem- seems this time m have mom m du naryy as severe today as they were their mix of indent subsidies.Other menu am still asking us to make the with ,he rnusls of Calif ina's old- m 1977. Overall water norag< m waterdependent indusmn fazing most persoml kinds of sacrifices] time water religion than with any California is cunentiv at ]a percem the same restrictions might have no Na matter what anyone tan an- serious expectation of significant of nomtal u rompartd with only a9 choice but to shut down. the value of adopting an an- serious savings. percem a[ ,hit rime of the year in What's missing must of all this yr ommemal ethic, this a by aav The situation is certainly serious. 1977. And while ,he Colorado year are the rallying trio, the senx mecum a very small tail 1Mn8.m although the efficn,of this drought. River, the most important ouuof. of common common and shared was an enormous and probably very u m 1977.ate uneveniv distributed. wasteful dog If nobody in California The central coast.which even in win bathed or flushed their toilets for the years ttteivI Ins water than many next six months, n would hardly of the less heavily simulated area Only about four percent of a/1 the water make as much difference as a very directly inland. will be especially minor improvement inthe ef icien- hard hit.Santa Barbara has replaced we have developed actually winds up being ry of irrigation. Mann in the place where rich people used in the home. And yet it's there, where we So why do we do it that way? In live but can t flush. And activists pan because n does a lime goad — throughout the scale's water com- IIVe, that governments are Still asking us to nobody wants to stand up for gutter munity love that kind of object make the most persona/ kinds of sacrifices. flooden. In part itmakes in feel si leon. often for directly contrary wood. nobler. mom in tune with the reasons, natural flow of things. And for the Advocates of continued develop water agencies. it's just good public merit point to the plight of Sanm state source of supply for half of hardships that made drought gar- relations to show t a[ thev art ac. Barbara now and Mann then as California's population. has been dens in 1977 the next best thing in lively concerned,even If a la at our cauuonary examples of what can running low, storage in its am. the way of panmiparory patnousm °xpense. happen i/you try to rennin urban moth reservoir system is cunemly al since the victory gardens of World Beyond its practical benefta. ggrowth by limiting water supplies. I IS percent of the long-term aver. War H. Civic vision in Mann in promoting cutbacks in times of Envi inmenafius at the same dine age 1977 was something you could sniff drought is gooil for keeping the faith applaud these events az a wav of The focus of drought relief has as soon as you stamped thfough a in water development. It helps to reminding people gencmlly at the 'Mud u well. In 1977. enormous friend's front door. But government build public support for future pro• limits of natural resouren while efforts were expended at both ends under George Deukmejian isn't lec[s.And a renews the old myth an forting the unhammY few who lire in of the situ m get additional water much of a participatory acticiry any whuh the whole water system has thou areas to learn about the ben- for Central Valley apicniu re.There more, not even for the govemon been built — the idea chat all of efin of conservation at ,he most were lots of reasons for that This is a guy, after alh who shaed these facilities have been built to personal level.op Such problems aimblic Agribusiness then was facing the out in once by omining the Depart- the mpeoplm thusly People.and at threat of drastic cuss, up to 75 ment of Water Resources m scrape fa nonce am water officials to demonstrate not percent in some area. The conven. all thou"Conserve Water' bumper ones that in foe[ benefit man from only their own ingenue, but the nonal wisdom among campaign strips off the ram ears because they these supphn. If you believe the remarkable flexibility of the modem consultants of both parties held that offended his supponen in the ages. myth, then of course it makes sense water system u well. Just as Man^, the Central Valley controlled the cultural community. that it should be people who suffer forexample.was"saved"In 1977 by balance of political power. And One thing that hunt changed, the most. But that's not the way tor laying a temporary pipeline to the y1WD war happy m help out be• however, is that agnbminess still system works East Bay, so can Santa Barbara cause It needed agribusiness help in gets hystennl about suggestions that None of this mom that water secure relief in the shoo form pushing for construction of the Per- it could be doing mom to conserve othcials should sin cunin off sit through plans now under way to MP spheral Canal.The result agdcultum waur. lies to the state's economic base o into the Melmpoliun Weser Dip m the middle of the wont drought Thirteen p tnm's abundant supplies on the eh Years later What nine order m le, Las Angela fill up all South Coat. Although geNng the m the suit's history enjoyed a ban- ag;mlmnl resistance to cone-va- thane swlmmmg pools that Nonhet, water that far north. through the ner year.racing up record sales and Lion u stall making the cities hap Californians love to hate.But n does j unsdictions of at leas,four indepen- actually expanding the amount of The problem ts that many of the seam that d the old slain were dam water agencies, will r i a tom- acreage under Inflation. injunctions to conserve, which mu- rally tine.if the water system really dent wd bureaucratic exercise.. com- This wear the Central Valley is mentalities one after another arc war built to benerit people. then Il bare repress confidence threatened with cum of _s5 to 50 unthn6 out once again ,a impose we'd operate u m such a way as to that they're up ,o the tusk. percent m in supplies from both the upon Nair citizenry, make even Ins ensure that they suffered last and state and federal water systems. But sense in relation to what actually least ether than the othe• \v Indeed, the fact that we're Balm- with agribusiness'political influence happens to the scale's water supply. around. Maybe this year we 'rig the fourth consecutive vear of waning and plans for the Penmheral Eighry-five cement of the water goes little wafer. without having suffered Canal back on the shell! those m- to agriculture. According to state William Rahn is a McClamhy --•. .••... •r^^nmvr I,m r umccs africtions an mom likely to stick animates 40 percent of the in. News Service nlumnisL ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS _:- Name of Paper Section Data Slow — LA nmss D 5-310 W41-M SHcf¢VU How Rationing Would Affect Firms in Water. For some,the plan presents a formidable challenge.But others that have already cut use of water use 4 could emerge unscathed _ ••- I — : By PATRICK LEE and GEORGE WHITE ..R�..,� TIMS STAEf W0.fTERS Mayor Tom Bradley's proposed mandatory water rationing plan . could do more than turn lawns brown. .b could put a launch ds Los - Angeles the 2aes both large ands and including the 25t large tnewly 2s and. ei public agencies that use nearly 20%-of. the citY's water. "Conservation is probably necessary;". _ said Peter Wheaton,general manager of Pacific Coast laundry,a firm that wash- - - es and dyes clothing for the garment 'Bh Ian Anreln'I,mn •MAIN STORY:A3 Anheuser-Busch's brewery in Van Nuys is the OWP•s No. 2 business customer. industry. "But it=old create a problem - for me. Our whole industry is centered on water." DWP'S LARGEST WATER CUSTOMERS Bradley's plan calla for businesses and others to cut water use by 10% below _ istau og, 1986levels,with some exceptions,or face y� c4, IrbEftdr.I surcharge penalties. For some users.that presents a formi- 1 "Cny Depamnent of Recreation 512.043 . dable challenge. For others, it presents 2 canoed 258.110 an added cost of doing business And for 3 al,hamw-Busch 228.520. some. It is a vindication of voluntary_ 6 LA.B ,cl of Edugtlon 201,914 efforts already under way. 5 LA.County.inludi,g Cnnly/UW Medkpal Cemar 119,752 In any case, it Is unlikely that the 6 LA.Cay Rouang Autho ty 184.611 rationing will mean layoffs or production 7 UCLA 132,258 cuts,and the mayors plan allows compa, 8 caamns 131.812 Wes to appeal rationing if such copse- quencesseem likely. 9 DWP's taxer generating system,prim"valey Steam Plant 74.907 The largest industrial customers of the 10 Vwemns Admlastmtian 73,129 DWP include electronics firms, aircraft II LA.City Dapartmenlof Abports - 59.281 makers and petroleum refinertes. 12 Texaco Ra .9 8 Marketing 47.643 The Unocal Corp. refinery in Wil- 13 use 46,292 minglun, already the Department of 14 Shmna to ganl(Indhldua wto Bros a large number 42.484 Water and Power's largest private cus- of apartment buddings) tomer with a monthly bill of about 15 C ,fon ,Slater ty campuses 41,880 $250.000. has increased its water use by 16 Pork La erm Management 39.290 about 20% since 1996.said plant manag- 17 Matclunext.Dyeing 8 FhdMing 39,183 V George Walker. 18 MCA/UNvanal 34.864 That means the refinery will have W 19 gases FgaWatlon tb tau 33.214 cut water purchases from the DWP by 20 Stat gYtFoeds 31.099 about 30% or face fines. '"Chat will be a real challenge for us."Walker said. •erngum eaah lmaucreet awn...74a gaane "It will mean we'll pay even stricter 9.ece•.Deprmwtowets,aM tbwar attention to conservation efforts here." Please see wxrkat,vim ta.AaeMemm� ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Mane of Paper Section Page WATER: Rationing Could Present Challenge Costisaad from DI Is served only to customer who something has to be done and it has Walker said. The company is al. request it to have tomb in he said ready erraieng landscape water- The Bradley proposal "rewards He argued that those who man. ing,vehole washing and hosing off these who have been trying to age agricultural pastures and crop- areas. Now, the company will re- coRseree."Kyker said land are cot being aaked to cow- evaluate operations to use less While conceding that Were is a serve enough. Businesses in Los water and use water from W own need fen water caraervalmn. a Angeles and other urban areas in wells more. All the will cost the number of executives and trade California are bearing a disprapor. refinery money, although it groups expressed concert that the borate share of the conservation shouldn't reaolt in layoffs or a dip _ BraNey plan night adversely af- burden,he said m production.Walker said. feet buainemes that have grown But the city.farmers and nurs- Miller 1986. cry owners say the lose of water is SmllulY• a[ he Tenco roc "Our goal Is to grew and make agrmterpotential burden to them. refinery at the Texton, the money," said Wheaton at Pacific The owner of one small neigh- DWP'a Na 12 aWilmin tart Year. Coat laundry."To reduce Iwarer hishood nursery In Wen Lon An- officials are"studying the potential use] to 1986 levels isasking rn to gels said We only way he could effects [the plan] would have on Fern W the same machines Isves obey a 10% cutback is to lower the refinery, but we expect to be as 1986" pr"WetidR able i meet the ," said g planDavid d "Utden the regula erl takes inn We do all our grinursery our. It's implemented." spo David accotion based greater the camgrowth of a who re said We nursery owner. DWPJohnson, a Texaco at Taman. ion based on We be per of a whorequith u Waters we juame st the DWP use skyrocketed .how that 289.5% successful bi[woWd hepeeallMCI usecvuay in r.wely rani y}ter use skyrocketed by 289.5% sAndthaL buldittb Kyker said .my W bca nea Strictly retail from 19M to 1989,although Texaco "A tar-Kist; o Foods' ei nurseries can just buy whatever disputes those figures. Star-Kist Foods' Heinz Pet they need and rut down on water, Businesses that have already cut Products Co. pet food plan[ on use that way.I grow everyd rug.it water use fear being pressed to do Terminal bland has grown into one stays with me at lean a year.We MOM. of the cirys largest water users have to water everything. espe- "Similar businesses in Southern The plant's operations have ex- cially when it gets hot" California already use less water panded slgmflosntY once 1986 be- (Wan these in other pars of the cause operations at other plants t Kenner Canyon Farms in country];' said Benedykl Dala ie- had been consolidated A a spoke- Tarzana. co-owner Robert lewekt a geography professor at mansard Dedlow said he Winks that Brad. Southern Blinps University and a If the plan[ were forced to cut legs proposal is a great idea and a consultant to the Metropolitan back W below 1986 levels. 'we're long time coming. But he added Water District. "On short notice, talking jobs now,"said spokesman that he is a native of Berkeley. there's net much more that can be William Goode The plant is Ink. where water rnnaervation s al- eliroinated" logician installing recycling egrvp- ready an Integral part of life. The Westin-Bonaventure Hotel, ment to cut water use by 30% by "In a general way.I'm definitely one of the city's largest users of year-end. 0support A water coraervatlon;' water,has cut is water use mgmfl- Bedard Frenzel.general come - said Dedlow, whose farm grows camly in recent yeare by instating er of the Wilshire Country Club.a- specialty irttuees for trendy res- low-water todets in pubic rest- Ion Angeles golf fambtY,is among muramm"When you see the water rooms and eam of 1.5W guest those looking for more direction wasted in Ion Angst., a 10% rooms and devices that resriR abouttleproposaL _ cutback is totally credible." water Bow from faucets and show- Frenzel said there has been Dedlow, said his operation could er heads said Robert Shiver. the much discussion of curbing barn cut water use in ion ets and sake hotel's c[def engineer.The hotel is sprinkling but wondered how au- and will try to cut irrigation water mitudRng automatic shut-offs on thonties would enforce such a curb u much ae possible. He's lucidm all kitchen faucets.As a result the m golf course operators"Gras is than men[. though. "We use some DWP gave the hotel a conservation our business."he said city water,but we drove a well,so award but year. Authorities should Worm golf we use some well wale'for beige- The hotel uses "considerably cause operators how often green lion"he said less"water than it did in 19M but can be watered he said He noted Beyond such obvious measures, would be hard-pressed to cut back that his country club installed a "to achieve measurable conserve- further,Shivers said. new sprinkler system in 1987, re- ton savings,industries will haven Similarly. many Loa Angeles during water usage by about 20%. undertake investments, and that s - restaurateurs have already adopt- Al Forest Lawn Memorial Park. may take month and years;'Dme- ed water conservation methods water use bass remained below 1988 gielewski said I; • and would welcome provisions that levels every month but one since f would force their competitors to INS. said Forest lawn Chairman In.staff with.Musa L la Wrap i make similar sacrifice said San- Fred Llewellyn. "It does create a COrmwtea to cos etary. sim ley Kyker. executive vice prey- hardship because in 1986 we were - dent, of the California Restaurant already being squeezed lby..r- Assn, a statewide trade group vation]and squeezed hard"Llew- whose estimated 1,0001.Angel- ellyn said e.-based members manage about Still. Llewellyn• who served as 3.DD0 city t'estauranta chairman of a blue-ribbon comers. Kyker said the restaurant arse- van an water conservation for ciation has toed to encourage Bradley in the late IM said he member to conserve water, urg- eupporu the principle of a comer- ing them to post note.that water vation plan with penalties"I think OFLAAGE COUNT( SANITA T ION GISinICTS NEPISFAFE?.• CUFFINGS �!la'rear?=_er �ecJct ?� i D<Iz 8t:c:�: f?�1 cS 4- 2 Z �2—SU 1y34�? f�i as 7.4��5 A22 WEDNESDAY,MAY 1,im xic Fullerton Asks Residents could make buildingl of a�water pendent on a management plan for any pro. to Conserve Water Supply posed a arepmen[. Some area developers have expressed concern aboutout the the help the county grapple with in- Proposed water management increase a Drought:The call for creasingly dire water shortages. the cost saying n g b increase less consumption is part of The guidelines are being developed moththe cos[ of housing by adding by a Water Conservation Task planning dev of loomeracy[o the a$IOWIIIg push by Force, which emects to make its Planning and developmem process. political subdivisions to report in June. Wieder said she hopes that the trim usage lest mandatory Most cities and water districts in building community will ultimately B ry Orange County are considering support her ordinance.The legisla- cuts be required. some type of water conservation lion. she added. would help the plan in an attempt to battle won- county achieve its goal of cutting By TOM McQUEE.NEY enmg drought conditions. water usage by 10"o. Point I.M NEWTON last week the South Coast Wa- and S w ter District on Laguna Beach Wieder said she intends to draft TIME 4nfF RITERS and Dana Point residents to cut an ordinance alter she receives the Fullerton cri Tuesday became water use by 10%. work of the task force. An ordi- one of a growing number of Orange The Newport Beach City Council nonce would probably be ready for County cities to ask its residents to is scheduled to vote on an ordi- the supervisors to consider in July, reduce their water consumption. nance May 14 that would require a she said. The City Council called on ren- 50% surcharge for water used for Orange County's water problems dents to cut water use by 10%.and residential and commercial con- are less severe than the shortages city officials warned that mandaw- struction and a 10% surcharge for faced in other parts of the state ry water reductions and fines for residential consumption of more because of a massive underground People who waste water could be than 1.000 cubic fee[per month. lake containing millions of gallons imposed this summer if voluntary San Clemente. which faced a of water accumulated through cen- measures me not successful. water shortage last summer.has in tunes of perci lauun from the Santa FWlemon's action came the same place the county's strictest water Ana River. day Orange County Supervisor restrictions. Harnett M.Wieder announced that In January. the city Imposed a The lake contains several Years she intends to propose a county 90-day freeze on new construction supply of water for the county.but ordinance requiring developers to in an effort to conserve water. A only a ceram amount per year can comply with water conservation month later, the City Council gave be drawn off lest seawater mingle guidelines in order to receive a city staff the power to cut off with the lake.masmg a saline. building permit. service to irrigation systems that Became the lake Is beneath only Wieder, the board's most out- use too much water during a water the northern and central portion of spoken advocate of water conser. emergency. the county.South County residents vation, said the ordinance would Wieder's proposed ordinance have no access to it. CRAIVGE CCUN i( SANITATION CIS-in IC i a NENSrAF1== CUFFINGS Nane =P-S., Se" Pn I 0M 7:e:: NEWPORTBEACH Proposed Ordinance Limits Water Usage On May 14,City Council members will consider a proposed ordinance that asks residents to reduce water usage by 10% and city departments to reduce water usage by 15%. The ordinance would require a 50% surcharge for water used for residential and commercial construction and a 10% surcharge for residential consumption of more than 1,000 cubic feet per month. It would also limit watering in city greenbelts and parka The Draught Action Plan. as the ordinance is called comes m response to suggestions from the Metropolitan Pla- ter District which supplies water to Newport Beach. Given current drought conditions and the possibility of another dry winter.Newport Beach Counniman Phil Sansone warns that unless resi- dents cut back on water use."there's no question that we're in a very serious situation. The ordinance would also allocate =.000 to purchase water conservation kits for distribution, free of charge. in residents The kits include bags for toilet tanks,faucet washers and shower heads that restrict water flow. in addition. under the ordinance, the utility department would offer free checks for water leaks. Residents would be asked for volun. tary comphance with other guidelines. including not hosing down dnveways and sidewalks, using shut-off vaives on hoses when washing cam and turning off fomwims that do not recycle water. Restaurants would be asked to serve water only upon request. Sansone said he hopes residents rec- ognize the need to limit their water use. and is mumistic about the goals of the proposed ordinance. But, he said. a similar measure enacted two years ago was unsuccessful. and water consump. tion rose about 4% the summer it was instituted —LAURA MICHAELIS ORANGE COUNrr SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Nauss arPazr SeImI I Pa]e I Date CA�in7Es A 36 4e-z2-90 I-WllfCAI /EA17 '~Tr `AN You Qp — A30 "DAY.APRIL 3 1990AC THE ENVIRONMENT.WNATYOU CAN DO tVial( AIVWYNa son been revonnor a imyrove vie trebonmmrW takilp neq Nape long been mmendM by mvironmmal and rovumn pempa..(l nn Eo/N e' Is m,, Vir eare Alm ant so tns duo,no m peer a"Germ Pie asi to oe.peaa vie rnneng W a t wlsn Net ma, .pe,eAsse. ns, 'k, aM intro."The edl ou p is a fin o/arbors vim mrr improur vie mvironmmt ar weg m vie pmhlmu Net M(y agerda(c arnM FNYAOAorrLLPaOeLI aivull water-wing devices • Water ca.uou sewn -In ahowere and Wdelr. overload,energycwtsanngs. Tmnsportatlon a Drive leas.Car- poll than,global •landarape mN Plano • Wat.conservation. Public transit.Telee-elommutte. warming,traffic mogeston. Gapwnpnatemthe ctimaa. Cormlldeleemndv energy cmtavings :. Recycle3aa,Plastic. aAvppputiou global a Drive higher-mdeage can a Global warming. sluminumand.,weloapen warming,ocean pollution. coastllne pollution.solid Nlmmdness ooale .(Each t wane,energycmtsanngs. that redness mueage.Farb car. on lheaverage.emns five was 1 Claaeop rooms notlnuer. 0 ""pollution,global 1' ofesrb w ondldeayear. nt C�m•hsstiug/avcoMitiorWg weanin,energy coat a Keep moor veletcle engross • An mauuon.global ''emtsinthoarooms seeing. tuned. warning.energy,cast avinga •a Keepfunyceeodau is Airpolluum.globed - • Use radial Loss and inflate in •Global warrNn vi avmm g,energy -mMltmrWg Nesn cJem saa ngs. energy cast mu rec mm oended cmtavmgot sangs pre°sons' •a Ttrn off airmndiWnm • "Nuiumiglobal is OMervespsed Wee • Global warming.Energy when a room is Mtn sae for warrrung.energyos ct con savings. �erv.al boon it uk.lea avinga energy to CWI down the hot 'a Take users conk.oil We •Sewer overload ground roam law than s you left the servltt nuuon hoe reeyclln8. water pollution,name waste unit g' Burying the oilin yards,or a Repair leaks from faucets, • Water conarvauon.sewer dumping In the trash could garden hoses,toilets overlord . eonumtnate,underground aauden • Inedate but water healer and • Alrpofiution.global hoterater Pipes. warmm8.energy cost Home savings.water conservation. a Buy energy-efficient at Air pouuuon,global appbsnces warming energy cast Goods and Services anngs. •Bring durable(canvas, • Als, Uuum.mone ` •RePateconvenuorul tight Air Pollution.global suing)shopping bagsb depletion.ocean pollution, holes with compact fluorescent warming,energy coat market Avoid paper or plaNc coasLine pollulan.solid light bulbs.which cost about savings. grocery bags wastes. $12we onlone- tlmss longer and aReduceuseof ble •Solid wane.air pollution. we only -fourth the Nls. Po electncllY� peckeging materiels a lmulaes Yaw More.C tific • AlrpuLUUan.gimed a Avmddupaobiepialn.cupa a Solldwasee.alrpolluuon. andweathentalpdaonand warming,energy cast and utensils and paper towels in wdows. snngs. a Avoid products containing a Global warning,mane a Reduce use of frePacss, a Airpollution.global chlonfluorocarbom.Same CFC depletion. warming products us still on the market. including aemeot dust • When"let,a noon use, a Energy cost savings m reovers.plastic confeW Intel,damper closed. makers,boat horns and various cleaning sprays for electronic • Planttrtnandavegetable a Global warming•energy egwpreent such as sewing garden, emtavinga. math,..and VCRs. a RenyciechemiealCeaning a GrouMwaterpollution, a When recharging summands, a Global warming•mane solvents sewn r overload tovc w.es. an cundsl onm.find a aertnce dwleuoa nation that recycles the CM • B,miy9uentiu.of •Ground water pollution.air (Frcon). household products men a pollution,sewer overload, a Rpmmble.don'tma baron fire • Owns depletion. cleanest and pants to do the ph. ocean pollution,toxic waste. . Avoid unused or leftover exunguahe.:use traditional chemicela. on.. • Buy the lean mac Product •Title Waste No t use disposable diapers. a Solid waste.ground water . avasable(m thepb. polluuan,stir Nil...n.global among. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS r N = NE°NSFAPE:R CLIPPINGS Nmne at Paper Sea= Pap Daze StlM= 9�T ti n, %t l A y�-r10 Gyi4fii/L l� r �ay-� 1 D% water-reduction plan to offer rebates By RICHM0 OE ATLEY - each acre-foot cmoerted:aRer_a-rt- -`� A.r,,,s www duction of 5 percent from 1989's LOS ANGELES — A Metro- s�� um adjusted for population polimn Water Disuim =,alt to moo " An acre-foot is about p 326.000 aallona enough to meet the reduce water use by 10 portent in needs of afamilY of five for one I Southern Califorwa by offering re- year, . bates as part of a S35 million tan- ••We ddti't think we are dealing servation plan was approved Mon- yet with a situation where punitive day by a districtcomnttttee, measures am necessary.As we track The plan offers incentives but no progress through the summer and penalties and leaves specfic plans for car fall,fall, (the) board may have to i water reduction to local districts in consider going to more stringent the fourth year of a statewide measures"said Tim Quinn,director j drought of stare water projects supply and Eligible for the rebates art the 27 conservation for the MWD. agencies served by the MWD in six MWD General Manager Carl counties stretching from Venmm to Baronkay estimated $25 million of San Diego, an area drat includes the conservation plan's costs would about IS million constunen. be in lost reveaue to the district the plan also proposes, spen halt because of reduced water sales, and $ 500.000 for buying-ddtstrubuting SIO million would be paid out in water conservavon kiR and urges rebates. conservation with a resolution. It's nut stop a the MWD's boar '•fin terms of faring the water of directors today. Observers; said crisis. we think some dramatic pro- thev expected directors to pass the grams of this sort are emenual." proposal following Monday's quick Boronkay said t approval by the Water Problems MWD officials said the tonserva- r Committee, Lion plan encourages local water The proposed rebate is S 100 for agencies to build up their reserves. •.r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Name of Paper Section Page Date Goirtmt<rvTARy Subject 7 7i/✓£5 8 ' 6-/9- 9U 6 ASTEN/ATfrQ RECG9/>IATiOrt� ORANGE COUNTY VOICES With Reclamation, We Can, Stop Wasting `Waste' Water ■ Public water: Reuse offers a County for more than a year. The Orange County Water District Is the lead agency or feasible way to replace much of a participant in projects that would reclaim the water now imported into the nearly 20%of that total. Nearly $2 billion is needed to build the area,making us less Vulnerable. projects; unfortunately, only a little over 7% of that is available so far. Water By WILLUM R.MILLS Jr. agencies hope the Legislature will pass a bill that would authorize a2W million'In We can respond to four consecutive bonds to fund low-Interest loans for water years of drought In any number of ways, reclamation projects.If approved,the mea- We can wring our hands,bury our heads in sure will appear on the November ballot. the sand or take positive steps to deal with 'Already under construction here 14 a the problem. One of those steps should be landscape irrigation project, appropriately en Increase in the reclamation of so-called named Green Acres, that will supply "waste"water.The principle is simple:For treated reclaimed water for parks, golf every gallon of water that is reused, a courses, schoolyards and greenbelts In gallon of fresh water is saved. Fountain Valley, Santa Ana and Costa Orange County depends on water Im- Mesa. The first phase of this project will ported from northern California and the supplant about 5,000 acre-feet per year of Colorado River for about half of Its supply. Imported supplies.It will be operational in That makes us vulnerable to droughts In the summer of 1991, at an Initial oast of Northern California and in the Colorado about $25 million. We plan to more than River basin. double the project's original capacity with- Moreover, this area will experience a In the next five years and to add the cities 50% cut in the amount of water imported of Huntington Beach and Newpory Beach through the Colorado River Aqueduct over to the distribution area. the next decade.And because Proposition 9 The OCWD long ago established a tradi. was voted down in 1982, there is no tion of Innovation.Its Water Factory 21 in program to construct the peripheral canal Fountain Valley has been reclaiming waste to carry additional State Water Project water since 1975, under the scrutiny of supplies from the north.There are simply regulating agencies. This plant supplies no new cost-effective sources available for highly treated municipal waste water for Imported water. injection into the OCWD seawaterintru- It is, however, entirely feasible, largely sion barrier and for recharging ground through reclamation,that local sources can water.The plant was recently refurbished be developed to replace a significant so that It can produce up to 15 million amount of the water now being brought in gallons a day, about twice its former from outside sources. capacity. The district ground water man. A major goal of the Orange County agement plan proposes a substantial ex- Water District which manages the area's pension of Water Factory 21 to supply ground water supply, is to reclaim 100 wells that would inject drinking-quality million gallons of waste water every day.if reclaimed water directly Into the ground that can be achieved, local sources could waterbasin. meet as much as 80% of the water demand Rvery day,250 million gallons of"used" within the water district.The district now water flows past OCWD headquarters in supplies about 95% of the water used by 2 Fountain Valley and into the Pacific million of the county's 2.4 million residents. Ocean.Yet treated waste water Is perhaps The Idea of using water more than once the most dependable water supply availa- Is not new.Reclamation in California dates ble today. from the 19th Century,and It is now used Waste water reclamation is a sensible �..i in many public water supply programs. solution to the supply-demand problem. It Last fall,a statewide survey of agencies makes a lot of sense, especially In light of Involved in waste water reclamation the drought, to use local water sources to showed 87 projects that could, if all are fill local water needs. Implemented, reclaim 600,000 acre-feet of water annually. That Is enough water to William R.Miffs Jr.is general monger of supply the entire population of Orange the Orange County Water District. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Name of Pacer Sedan Page I Data 1 Subject D414.,V Hof )9 / 5-7- 90 /C59C/AvG -TNf 2)RouGN7 Facing the drought Underground water supply not endless By ROBERT BARKER p18pL °Y1 w"" "It's Act to come to this," Renna HUNTINGTON BEACH — "�� said. "I costs more than conven- W win an turning brown and dying - 'A tional sources.but you can't squeem in Sane Barbau in the fourth ....J any more water out of conventional stmighr bone-dry year of the Murm."- droughL "Ws Renna said the de utIf plant— The not India consul city appears '}, deiggnned to conven ocean water into herded for a major economte crisis ? drinlon, water — is slated tpo be in ire tourist indmtry if it doesn'twritten Imo the en,s master plan. ram im 1991, ofcials uid. He has hopes that money will be "Residents have been asked m sit aside in the butlget in the next make a45 percent cmback inthe sou _ can a years and thus a pilot unit of their water; a spokeswoman for - - - L .will be..opered a in the next five the citY's conurvauon hot line uid. -"�-� " years. he said. "They;m doing all they an to .-r-= Hsghtt produmion costs would be save their city. _ ,. offset by rebates from the Metro- Elsewhere, 6 billion board feet of �s - Y' - ppooliun District of Southern Cali- timber hen died throughout the su¢ - ,ter a yX` foram. which is urging member in the driest period a narµY 60 'G:'•Nx-x companies m find alternative waur Wears. Parched conditions, hich V,v.,...ti yr sources. aken trees so u<y an be finished ^.+i t - Technology is available and, in Off by insect pats, art expected to --3 fact, same U.S. Navy ships desalt doom another 6 million feet shin + "•'r_ their own drinking water. Renner Ye ar. - said. Cost for a pilot project might Salmon are dying beaum of shal- r range up to S5 million, he said. low flows and warmer water. .%' Finding a fuel source to power the The pro0nodon of hytlro-elenric 'W deulung plant may you problems. Rower is down. Water for imganim s.^M.` -` he said. as been cut in half in the gent Even though desert-like Southern Central Valley agriculture area _ California is immially making it In umian'd Orange County, 1, . ,j /' '�" k through the drought so far with pretty much business as usual. Resi- v minimum diuomson. there seems dents arc hominy off their driveways, _s' to be no doubt a serious drought is overwmirm, their lawns and run- _ ' grivvDing the sure. ning yrcctous water into the Suite rs 'O - �fi-. -4 Suranno Butterfield- the drought amtl down the shower drain. - °"a ru,,.e.�,er�,r.r„ response coordinator for the state But local water oRcials. blamed Huntington Beach Water Operation Manager JeM Renna Water Resources Board, said 1987. with water delivery systems from resit the sell at Hamilton and Braokh, atraeta. 1988 and 1990 have been officially Northern California and the Colo- classified es critically dry vars. She rado River in Araona and a deep mid 1989 would have lice.. too. undertgground basin in nonhera and But that's not even to get the area homes and major new water de- except for late March storms. utin Orange County,arc trying to through this year — the voluntary mends. the drought appears to be In a normal year, the combined rum oR the up m wasrcful ways, cuts are designed to eau conditions hitting hosre, flow of the Sacramento, Father. They'rt asking—err about to ask next yyecaar if the drought continues. Water`aperintendent Jeff Renner American and Yuba rivers a IS — residents to voluntarily rest In Huntington Bach,though—a mid officials are giving"serious con- million acre fat. she said. (An acre their water use. generally by 10 city that coincidentally is facing the sideration' to putting in Orange foot ofwater is the amount required percent. development of about 10.000 new Counry's first ocean declination (Pleat see WATER/Back Pagel ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Name of Paper Seaicn Page Date Subject WATER Orange County's deep bin nor bur- doubled and will extend into New- Also proposetl is a 50 percent tomins odetground wamr basin rt Beach and Harrington Beach, rut:hargeforwaterusedinennstruc- From At fed by oru ffseems to keep gurgling CO said. don (for paying and in and to cover an am of land to a depth along. Water from the underground other work.) of one four, about 326,000 Ilons. In fact re the 's enough supply for basin makes it possible for Hunt. In Laguna Beach, the Laguna (An average Southern California several yon, according to William in ton Beach to get about 70 percent each ted County Water Department foot family uses about a halfacre in R. Mills. general manager of the of its water from the underground adop a resolution on April a and around the home each year.) Orange County Water District that liquid massure. It buys the test from asking a 10 percent voluntary cut. The flow is expected to be 8 opiumrunoRwater from the Santa the Metropolitan Water District back. Million acre feel this year she said. Ana River for the underground The Mesa Conolidated Distrim -Ifwe do not achieve that or ifit's In 1977. the worst drought year in basin. which supplies Costs Mesa Sad- a hot summer. we may have to ask memory. the water flow was 5 When bulging in 1983. the basin dents.a little bit of Newport Beach for additional or mandatory million acm feet she said. conuincd I million am feet of and John Wayne Airport,gcu about rationing.' General Manager 3oe The Central California Coast — water. Mills mid. .After taking 66 percent of its water from the Souvella said. Santa Barba.. San Lon Obispo. 50.000 to 100.0D0 acre feel out in underground basin. Like Newport Beach. Laguna has Venture — are the most seriosuly drought times. about 600.000 am -its reasonable to believe we ran no wells and buys all its water from hues, feet of water remain& considerably make it through the summer Metropolitan 3✓ater District The coastal cities am not pan of mom than the 450,OD0 acre feet altar without any kind of mooning" The Metropolitan Districtea crted state or federal delivery systems and the even more severely dry year of Mesa Consolidated General Man. by a vote of the people in 1928. arc forced to rely on their awn 1977. ager Cad Kemp mid. On May 17. delivers almost 500 billion Ilonsaf delivery incomes. she mid. They Thanks to treatment of whom though, the districts board of dine- water a car to Southern C�alifsmia reportedly chose not to parucipam water from the inland empire of San tors will vote on whether to ask for The Colorado River Aqueduct in the sate waterproject out oftheir Bernardino County and the in- voluntary cutbacks at the request of began delivering water in 1941 over own desire to control population creased water moots caused by Metropolitan. 'a_ miles of dean and mountain growth, according to oRrtal& urban buildup,the Santa Ana River "people need to know we live in ranges between Lake Havasu and a Despite the dry sure of affairs. is flowing at three times the rate of the desert, in a semiarid arm." he terminal reservoir in lake Mathews Butterfield mid them is no data to 1977. he mid mid. near Riverside. A major exp�onston suggest that a global warming is Alan, the Orange County Water Kemp mid the district in 1988 project was complet in 1961. causing the drount.-in the last 20 Martin's Water Factory in Fountain aencouraged"a 10 parent cutback In 1959. the State Legislature vmrs. 10 have Fait above normal Valley is-kickmi,up"the treatment and "the folks did pretty well." he authorized the Feather River Project fainfall and 10 below." she said. of waste water, Mills mid mid. — now known as the State Water "Maybe it (the drought) is an The water factory —"one of the In Newport Beach. where mi- Pmjmt Metropolitan first began m. Indieaaon of global warminij, but I most advanced" in the nation. ac- dents have all their water imported «thing Northern California water in find it hard to believe,' mid cording to Mills — is turning out because them arc no wells to tap into 1972 at Castatc Lake. Mo... Roos, chief hydrologist for 15.000 am feet of treated waste the underground supply. previous More than two-thirds of Cali. the Water Resources Board. each year that is of better quality attempts for voluntary,water cut- forams annual rainfall — 200 -When you look at all the wodtl's than normal drinking wain,he mitl. backs weren't as successful as hoped. million acre feet falls in the northern stations. there's not that much Additionally, toe O.nee County according to Utilities Director Jeff pan of the state. officials mid. change. We've had droughts in the Wamr District's Water Factory, at Stamm. Evapomuon returns most of this early 1930s' Ellis Aymue and the a05 Freeway.is Officials will take a different mum to the atmosphere. leaving an aver. However, the weather has been constmning a pipeline in a S25 on May 16 when they will ask the a annual sure water supply of mil more extreme in the last 15 years, lion Gmn Aces polar to de- City Council to impose surcharges about 75 million acre feet Roos mid. "It's enter wet or dry, liver 7.500 as7e feet of reclaimed to stem the water use. 'lore than two-thirds of the de. not in the middle. It's kind of lout water to irrigate parks and golf Officials will vote on a 10 percent mand comes from the South=pan. or famine, the weather seema to be courses. The protect isexpened to surcharge for residents who use including San Joaquin Valley and mom emtic." in operation next year. he mid. morethan 10100<ubicfeetofwater Southern California. according to Rain or shine,wet times and dry. Eventually, Green Arms will be a month (7.500 gallons.) oRcials. ORANG_ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPE= CUFFINGS Name at Pacer Searm f Pare Dale commeuTrtky S iie ; rn n cS lM �l�5 90 I CtlA � elL mA)Z-1C 77nQ AT\M`WHY DO ;/W: WASTE SO A UCH'T By Robert W. Adler and Trish Mace as Angeles has two major water problems. The first is too little water.The second is too Lmuch water.California's imminent water shortage by now is well known. Because the state is facing its fourth consecutive year of drought, residents are bracing for some strict water-saving measures—bans on using water to hose down driveways or sprinkle lawns and gardens, moratoriums on new connections and household rationing. Then how can Las Angeles have too much water? Each year the city and county produce billions of gallons of sewage waste-water, most of which is partially treated then dumped Into the Pacific. This effluent is a major source of coastal water pollution. Equally important,it is lost forever as a valuable source of recycled water. The real problem, then, is finding a way to resolve this hydrologic paradox Can the billions of gallons of sewage dumped into Southern California coastal waters be redirected to profitable use? And if this water is so . polluted,is it safe to do so? To answer these questions, some background is needed an water use in the region and methods of waste-water reclamation. The serious water shortages facing Southern Califor- nia should come as no surprise. After all, America's second-largest city sits in the middle of what is essentially a desert What is surprising is that the problem has been postponed for so long. For many years Southern Californians have been spoiled by ample water deliveries,despite rapid popue- tion growth and sparse local supplies. In 1952 the Metropolitan Water District issued the Laguna Deciara- lion,which promised to supply Southern California with sufficient water to spur postwar economic growth.And it did so with a vengeance—water from the Colorado River, the Mono Lake basin, the High Sierra and the Owens Valley bathed Los Angeles despite steady population growth over the past half-century. But now, many of Southern California's traditional outside water sources are drying up.Because of a court decision a quarter-century ago,Califomia's share of the Colorado River is being reduced.Other litigation has cut water supplies from Mono Lake and the Owens Valley. Combined with four years of below-average precipita- tion,the region now faces a severe shortage. More important, the steady stream of low-priced water has given Southern Californians little Incentive to use it efficiently.Americans in general treat water as a virtually unlimited resource, using almost 50% more waterper capita than the nearest runner-up nation,and- almost five times as much as some industrialized Please see WASTE,Me Robert W. Amer is a senior a&orney with the Mahtral Resoarces Defense Council in Washington;Trish.{face is a scientist in NRDCs new Las Angeles office. ~\ ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS M$ SUNDAY.APRIL 29, 1990 Name Waste reclaimed water to area growers. .'t� l :u"ore s[.rn local industries and area growers. ers. Lcis Angeles has reclaimed water Continued from MI Gnaea available in Griffith Park and the countries.But Southern California, Sepulveda Basin. becausethe area is hotter and drier -Nationwide only about a fifth of than other regions, uses about seammmom 1% of water use in the United twice as much water per person States is met by reclaimed water. Nan is case in New York or - By comparison. reclaimed water other Eastern states..And Call- °ps`maa met 4% of Ismel's total water forma is almost entirely dependent needs in 1960, and is effected in an irrigation w grow more than 200 henna reach 16%by the year 2001 Surely cis. we can do much better.both in the Part of the solution to this prob- Los Angelo region and in the lem Has in more efficient use of IMeaico nation as a whole. water. While conservation—such ' I The Metropolitan Water District. as installing toilets that use only I`" which supplies 500 billion gallons 1.5 gallons per flush,as Ins Angel- We Geemmany each year to the area's 13 million es has mandated and wafer-saving I 1 residents, is predicting a 12% showerheads and faucets—can and shortfall this year—a deficit of should make a big difference. an 'rm"CO about 60 billion gallons. or 164 equally valid aspect is why 'water i� million gallons per day. The 90 rationing is imminent when billions million gallons of reusable water of gallons of water are being 'llu--naea Kingdom that Los Angeles County alone dumped into the Pacific each year. dumps into the Park each day Sixteen sewage-treatment plants sweaen could meet more than half the from Santa Barham to San Diego t area's impending water shortage. dump 1.3 billion gallons of waste. Water Consumption Distribution cost and the lack of water. every day into Southerncn� inn by Country adequate conveyance systems are California coastal waters. { . I ; Yearry, in thousands the primary reasons why less than Why can't this water be reused -1 I of gallons used per half of this wastewater is reused It amen to help meet the region's fresh- person is ironic that water transported water needs? One reason is that hundreds of miles across the state. this sewage—much of which re- L from Mono take and the Colorado ceives only advanced primary p IW 7s/ 304 190 500 600 R[ver, has an economic advantage treatment—carrin with it massive seem wauam.m;su+s over water reclaimed in the county amounts of pollutiom because of conveyance cows. Many of thus pollutants can be Recycled water should probably removed with better treatment. Wastewater reuse is not a new not be used for drinking water or While not clean enough to drink or idea. There are more than 1,000 other home consumption. But only use for other human-contact.uso. waste-water reuse projects in the a small fraction of total water use is adequately treated sewage water United States in which water is in the home—in California. for can be reused as irrigation water reused for irrigation, industrial • example, nine out of every 10 for crops, forests and parks and to cooling and processing and gallons of fresh water are used for recharge ground-water deposits. ground-water recharge.In the Los crop irrigation. Potable-quality In some cases, pollutants that In. Angelo area, about 30% of the water currently going to crop irri- terfere with water reuse—espe- sewage water produced by the gation could be sent to Los Angeles cially metals and other trades— county—I60 million gallons per for urban use, in return for num- come from industries that dis- day out of 530 million gallons—is ent-rich reclaimed sewage water charge their waste into public treated in levels clean enough for for crop irrigation. sewage-treatment plants. These reuse—irrigation of parks, aquifer Much work needs to be done to industries are legally required to recharge and industrial uses.These determine the hot ways to in. "pretreat"their wastes before they are mteworthy efforts. But less crease waste-water reuse in reach sewage plants; better pre- than half of this highly treated Southern California.What is abun• treatment and enforcement of es- water (70 million out of 160 million dandy clear, however, is that the fisting standards would allow gadore per dav)is reused,with the region will no longer he able to cleaner,reusable sewage effluent. remaining 95 million gallons dis- turn to water from other area to Some of the chemicals—such as charged dailyir.o the mean. meet current water needs—much nitrogen and phosphorus—seen as The city of Los Angeles and less any additional growth. At the "contaminants' in sewage effluent other San'nern California commu- same time. Las Angeles and envi• are actually beneficial nutrients in nities are even further behind in rons can no longer afford to corn. irrigation water.Sewage reuse can water-reuse programs,but there is mit the dual sin of polluting improve agriculture. because nu- some progress. San Diego, for es- Southern California's valuable trients are released slowly. rather ample. is building a 1-million-gal- coastline with poorly treated sew- than in a single large dose.as is the Ion-per-day reclamation facility. age while throwing away billions case with chemical fertilizers. scheduled to open in 1991, to sell of gallons of a scarce resource. 0 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CUPPINGS Name of Paper Sedon Page Data Subject Rcdrs>ER 4 a vnLu06E �L� /OBNT 6 injured as Amtrak train hits truck carrying sewage Knight-Ridder Newspapers trait spokesman Bruce Heard said. The train's fireman,W.A.Kagle, -. INDIANTOWN, Fla. — Am- and engineer David A.Rahn,were trak's Silver Meteor smashed into taken to a hospital m Stuart for a tractor-trailer carrying sewage treatment and observation. our hlanday, slightly injuring six peo- passengers were treated at the pie and coating part of.the train scene for bumps and bruises. with smelly sludge, authorities The driver of the truck, Hector said. Soler, 32, was unhurt. He was "You should have seen the con- charged with failure to stop at a doctor and engineer. They were railroad crossing. wearing it," said Martin County Soler was taking his sewage load sheriff's Deputy Glen Zirkle. over a gravel driveway to a cattle "They thought the engineer was ranch where the sewage was to be dead.They was hunting all over for spread as fertilizer. him.Turned out he went back into Martin County sheriff's Lt.Rich, the train and took a shower." and Atchison said the sewage"was The train, heading from Miami splattered all over everywhere. In to New York City with 161 passen- through the engine.Over the top of gem, collided with the sewage most of the cars. It just kind of truck at U:25 a.m. near Indian- sprayed all over. It smelled like town along a desolate stretch,Am. what it was." ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS N/a/meofPapsr Section Page Date Subject County to Seek . Ways to Recycle Organic Matter By GEORGE FRANK TIMES STAFF WMER SANTA ANA—In another move to prolong the life of the county's Bowerman said a major problem four landfills, the Board of Super- is keeping the yard clippings sepa- visors unanimously approved a rate I= other trash. In Seattle, plan Tuesday to look at alternative the city provides containers for ways to dispose of the 700,000 tons organic waste.which are picked up of vegetation thrown away each at curbside by special trucks with year in Orange County. mechanical arms. Some of the alternatives of get- That could cost each resident 81 ting rid of the grass, trees, limbs, or $2 per pickup. Bowerman said. bushes and leaves include shred- but the county might provide resi- ding them for landfill cover or dents with free dump sites if they converting them into compost to be hauled the waste themselves used for topsoil or fertilizer for So far this year, the supervisors lawns The county could sell or have approved a program for curb- give away the compost, depending side separation and collection of on the demand. recyclable materials, which is un- Supervisor Gaddi EL Vasquez, der way in several cities,and called who sponsored the measure• said for a study on how to dispose of Yard clippings are 18% to 30% of nearly two million old rubber tires the residential trash in the county. that reach the landfills each He said the organic material can be month. converted into a useful product Vasquez said that since the study that can be used for soil enrich- was begun, a company in Arizona meat, thus keeping millions of - and another in Mexico have ex- cubic yards of material out of pressed interest m taking the car landfills and extending their use. and truck tires. Frank R. Bowerman, director of He praised the Board of Supervi- the county's waste management son for being on the"front end of Program said that if the county progress"in trying to solve a major decided to go to composting,part gf problem created by "a throwaway the landfills could be set aside for society." piling the shredded green waste.It Vasquez also asked the supervi- could then be aerated periodically rots Tummy to review purchasing when turned over by machines, policies because the county needs and when matured could be hauled away to create topsoil for parks, inbe "in the forefront of develop- _ playgrounds and public landscap- ing new markets for recyclables by ing revtmng our own purchasing hab- --� Just this fall, Fairfield. Conn., its' opened a $3-million composting center. STAFFING UPDATE FOR NEW CONSERVATION. RECLAMATION AND REUSE DIVISION w In mid-December of 1989, the Districts' Board of Directors approved a staffing plan for the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse (CRR) Division which authorized the addition of two professional staff members to focus on water reclamation and conservation issues. Immediately after that authorization, working with the Personnel Division, we posted the notice for the two positions and advertised in local newspapers. At the same time, realizing that our needs would be narrowly focused, advertisements were placed in the American Water Works Association Journal and the California Department of Water Resources - Water Conservation News. As it turns out, our best response from interested persons has been from these two specialty advertisements. As a result of this recruitment process, we screened the candidate pool and interviewed a total of 11 prospective employees. At this time, we have been able to fill one of the two positions. Michelle Merritt has begun work focusing on the Districts' water conservation programs. Among the other 10 candidates interviewed, two were qualified for the position and we attempted to hire them. Unfortunately, we were unsuccessful, as each person had been offered other, higher paying jobs of a similar nature which they accepted. At this time, we are continuing to advertise and accept applications for the remaining position. CURRENT SLUDGE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES A. STATUS UPDATE 1. sludge Production and Distribution. For the last year and a half, 52% of the Sanitation Districts' sludge has been recycled while 48% has been added to refuse in landfills. In the recycling category, we have maintained 36% of our sludge delivered to composting and 16% of our sludge delivered for agricultural land application. Recently, all of the Districts ' sludge that is being landfilled is being delivered to the BKK landfill in West Covina. At this time, no sludges are being delivered to Coyote Canyon due to it being closed to sludge. a. STAFF REPORT FOR EXTENDING AGREEMENTS FOR REMOVAL, PROCESSING. AND DISPOSAL OF SEWAGE SLUDGE. The Districts are presently disposing of residual solids (dewatered sludge) by combining them with municipal refuse in a landfill in Los Angeles County, or by recycling portions of the sludge. Our current production is about 35 loads per day. Each load is approximately 20 tons. About 50% of the sludge solids are disposed of at the landfill and 50% processed and recycled as a compost material or directly applied to agricultural land for beneficial reuse. Because of the difficulty of disposing of sludge and the tenuous nature of disposal alternatives, the Boards have adopted a policy of practicing multiple disposal options. Accordingly, the Districts have entered into contracts with four separate firms for sludge disposal and/or reuse under varying terms. 1) APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO AGREEMENT WITH RECYC. In 1988, the Boards first entered into a one-year contract with Recyc, Inc. , to remove, process, and dispose of sewage solids at a cost of $380.00 per truck load. Subsequently, the Boards amended the Recyc contract, extending its term for an additional year. Recyc presently receives about ten loads per day out of the Districts total production of 35± loads per day and makes it into a compost material out of it. Staff is recommending that Amendment No. 3 to the present contract with Recyc, Inc. , be approved providing for annual extensions of the contract upon mutual agreement of terms, currently at the same price for disposal of $380. 00 per truck load. The extension will provide continued disposal for the .i Districts' sludge while Recyc's alternative long-term site is developed. Recyc's present facility is in Ontario; however, they are in the process of developing an other processing site in Riverside and, if successful, will then close the Ontario facility. If that should occur, then it may be necessary to renegotiate the contract at which time staff will return to the Boards for authorization. 2) APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH L. CURTI TRUCK AND EQUIPMENT In 1988, the Boards also entered into a contract with L. Curti Truck and Equipment to remove, process, and dispose of sewage solids at a cost of $380.00 per truck load from Plant No. 1 and $420. 00 per truck load from Plant No. 2. In 1989 the contract was amended and extended for one year. Curti presently takes three loads per day and processes the sludge into a compost material. Curti presently hauls from Plant No. 1 only and is likely to only haul from Plant No. 1 over the term of any amended contract. Staff is recommending that a new negotiated agreement with L. Curti Truck and Equipment be approved for one year at the current price for disposal of $380. 00 per truck load from Plant No. 1 and $420. 00 per truck load from Plant No. 2. The agreement does provide for annual extensions upon mutually agreeable terms. The agreement will help provide continued, reliable disposal alternatives for the Districts ' daily sludge production. 2 . Coyote Canyon Landfill Closure. In March of this year, the Orange County Integrated Waste Management Department, which operates Orange County landfills, opened the new Bee Canyon landfill and significantly reduced the flow of solid waste to Coyote Canyon landfill. At that time, the IWMD began the closure process for the landfill. The Sanitation Districts' have proposed to the IWMD to use the Districts' sludge as a portion of the final landfill cover. The final cover will be approximately 6-feet thick which includes a top soil layer of 2 .5-feet for growing plants. The Districts' sludge would be an excellent material to blend with other soil planned for this top layer. Sludge would add nutrients, would increase the organic humus content of the soil and improve the water holding capacity of the soil. Much research of this type of project has occurred and this research has shown that sludge blended with locally available sandy soil will improve the survival and health of plants installed by the IWMD. The IWMD is expected to finalize its landfill closure plan this - summer and begin the closure process later this year. The ,� closure activities should last about 18 months. 3. New Cooperative Ventures. As a part of pursuing sludge ... management options for Board consideration, the CRR division staff has been proceeding on three new cooperative ventures in sludge reuse. Two are local, while one is in the central California valley. The central valley project would be an agricultural land application project similar to the Districts' current projects in the Palo Verde Valley area of eastern California and the Yuma area in Arizona. Staff has visited several prospective farmers in the central valley and have earned favorable receptions. We have been asked by these farmers to propose demonstration projects. Staff is formulating project plans and proposals which would be forwarded to the farmers. The two local projects are co-composting proposals, one with the IWMD of the county and one with Village Nurseries. Composting is the biological decomposition of organic matter at an elevated temperature. Co-composting is a term applied to the blend of sludge and yard waste material such as tree prunings, leaves, grasses, etc. When these materials are combined and composted one has maximized the reuse opportunity. At the county each year, they receive several hundred thousand tons of yard waste which could be composted with the Districts' sludge. Staff is working with the IWMD's recycling manager to develop a project to bring these two materials together. On a much smaller scale, the local nursery generates several thousand tons of yard waste annually which could also be blended with sludge to make compost. Several advantage accrue from such a project including 1) reduction of yard waste going to the landfill which saves landfill space and dollars, 2) recycling of yard waste and sludge on the nursery property which reduces the need for imported soil products which also reduces use of petroleum products which lessens energy use, improves air quality and saves dollars. Staff is working with the nursery management to develop a project to bring these two materials together. 4. Regulatory Liaison. A significant portion of staff time recently has focused on managing state legislation that affects the Districts' sludge management. At the state level, a recent legislative proposal, AS 1820, would amend last year's Integrated Solid Waste Management Act (AS 939) . Before our involvement, including testimony before a state Senate hearing of the Natural Resources and Wildlife Committee, the measure would not have allowed cities and counties to get recycling credit for any sludges that were recycled. Clearly, this approach is not a recycling incentive. During April and May, staff in concert with CASA and other agencies, successfully modified the bill to eliminate the sludge recycling credits exclusion after 1991. In the intervening v period, state agencies with the assistance of CASA and Tri-TAC members, including the Sanitation Districts, will review the safety of sludge management and make any recommendations for \r' changes that may be appropriate. At the federal level, the Bureau of Land Management in the Department of the Interior has issued a policy statement banning municipal sewage sludge application to any lands under their jurisdiction. Obviously, this policy is extremely negative and the POTW community including the Sanitation Districts is actively attempting to have BLM change this policy. EPA continues to develop a final proposal for sludge management regulations. The agency will issue results of a nationwide survey of sludge quality later this year followed by issuance of the regulations in October 1991. B. SLUDGE MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN As presented above as part of conservation and reclamation, staff has evaluated the needs for sludge management implementation and developed an approach for the Directors' consideration. A completed sludge management implementation plan will be distributed at the committee meeting. ref. smpstf.rpt RE: AGENDA ITEM N0. 14 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS EI ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA June 27, 1990 1040 BLUE<VENUE e O.BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CAUFONNIA 9272B-8129 171AI962.2A11 REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Meeting Date: June p.m. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Present: Director Dan Griset Director James Neal William Mahoney Vice Joint Chairman Director Leslie Pontious Richard B. Edgar Past Joint Chairman Director Charles Puckett Norman E. Culver Past Joint Chairman Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel James Wahner Chairman, District 1 Richard Polls Chairman, District 3 STAFF PRESENT: Evelyn Hart Chairman, District 5 Ruthelyn Plummer Chairman, District 6 J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Grace Winchell Chairman, District 11 Blake Anderson, Director of Tech. Svcs. Hank Wedaa Chairman, District 13 Gary Streed, Director of Finance Peer A. Swan Chairman, District 14 John Linder, Construction Manager Ed Hodges, Sr. Facilities Manager, Absent: Maintenance Bob Ooten, Assistant Superintendent, Buck Catlin Joint Chairman Operations Don R. Griffin Past Joint Chairman Iry Pickier Chairman, District 2 Don E. Smith Chairman, District 7/Past JC Don Roth County Supervisor Roger Stanton County Supervisor 1) 1990-91 Individual District Budget Recommendations. Summary of Budget and Fiscal Projections The Committee reviewed the staff's preliminary 1990-91 budget recommendations for the individual Districts which incorporate each District's share of the Joint Works operating and capital budgets approved by the Boards on June 13th. The budgets of the nine separate Districts total $575 million, including an estimated $265 million of borrowing in accordance with the adopted Financial Plan for the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. Accordingly, the total budget increase over the 1989-90 budget is $259.3 million. Approximately 10% of the budgeted requirements is for operations, maintenance and replacement (0, M 9, R) and 9% for debt issuance, reserves and retirement. Capital funds (inct,.ding reserves) for construction of master planned sewerage facilities fr: both the individual Districts' collection systems and the joint treatment riants account for 64%, and authorized general and contingency reserves are 17% of the total budget. -1- Executive Committee Report June 27, 1990 Funding of the budget for 1990-91 is provided primarily by accumulated construction and other reserves, accounting for 30% of the total . In addition, taxes contribute 6%, fees (connection fees and supplemental user fees) 12%, and Interest and miscellaneous income 6%. Projected borrowing to partially fund the current and future capital requirements will provide 46% of the total revenue. Except for Districts 13 and 14, which receive no ad valorem taxes, the tax appropriations received pursuant to Proposition 13 by the other Districts are fully allocated to cover 0, M & R. Districts 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 11 have previously adopted user fee programs to provide necessary supplemental financing of Districts' 0, M & R as the costs of wastewater treatment and disposal activities required by federal , state and local regulatory authorities have exceeded the ability of the ad valorem tax revenues to fund operations under Proposition 13 constraints. District No. 13 receives no appropriation from ad valorem taxes and is totally financed by fees. District No. 14 is financed by the Irvine Ranch Water District. As the rising costs of treatment exceed the ability of the District 7 ad valorem tax appropriations to fund the 0, M & R costs, this District will also need to consider implementation of a supplemental user fee program to provide the necessary revenues for financing their operations. Projections indicate that District No. 7 will have to implement supplemental user fees effective in 1991-92. The Districts presently treat 272 MGD of which 135 MGD (60 MGD now in service at Plant No. 1 and 75 MGD now in service at Plant No. 2) is secondary treatment. The budget projections assume renewal of the Districts' 301(h) Waiver NPDES Permit now being reviewed by the EPA and the SWRCB. Should the full secondary treatment be required, the capital (and 0, M & R) costs would increase substantially. The preliminary estimate from the Master Plan financial projections is that capital costs for the 10-year period would rise by more than $150 million (based on 1989 dollars). EPA and SWRCB have previously funded up to 8754% of the cost of construction of advanced treatment facilities but Congress has eliminated the construction grant program and replaced it with a revolving loan program. Thus, virtually all future treatment plant improvements will be a local responsibility. The real long-tern impact of federal and state requirements on District fiscal planning will be on 0, M & R costs. While, as noted, EPA and SWRCB have funded a portion of constructing facilities for a higher degree of treatment in the past, the added ongoing operating costs have always been paid entirely by the local community. The Joint Operating budget approved June 13th increased by 6.9% for 1990-91. Operating costs will continue to rise due to inflationary influences, rising flows, increased costs of sludge disposal , and other regulatory requirements imposed by such organizations as the EPA, RWQCB and South Coast Air Duality Management District. Under full secondary treatment estimated 0, M & N costs would increase another $15-20 million annually when all facilities are on line (based on 1989 dollars). -2- Executive Committee Report June 27, 1990 Capital financing for sewers and treatment and disposal facilities will be provided by accumulated construction reserves and interest earnings thereon, connection and capital replacement fees, sale of capacity rights, and, as discussed above, borrowing. User fees are also a potential source of funding a portion of capital needs for rehabilitation and replacement, treatment improvements, and debt repayment, as well as 0, M & R. Staff also reviewed the 10-year fiscal projections and painted out that the Districts' needs over the next ten years total $2.5 billion. When appropriate reserve requirements are added, a shortfall of over $635 million will occur during the 10-year planning period. Thus, it is clear that the Districts will have to utilize a combination of increased user and connection fees and debt financing to maintain their fiscal integrity and to keep pace with the rising costs of sewage treatment and disposal and increasingly stringent public health and environmental protection standards. Adoption of Gann Initiative (Proposition 4) Annual Appropriations Limit The Gann initiative limits state and local government appropriations of proceeds from tax sources to an amount based on changes in population and the cost of living over the 1978-79 base year, with allowances made for state and federally-mandated items. Each year the Boards must fix the limit in accordance with the initiative. In 1990-91, "proceeds of taxes" are well within the appropriations limits as set forth below: 1990-91 District Net 1990-91 District No. Tax Appropriations Budget Gann Limitations 1 $ -0- $ 2,273,000 2 906,000 8,539,000 3 2,775,000 11,384,000 5 1,195,000 2,174,000 6 29,000 1,362,000 7 1,940,000 3,317,000 11 812,000 2,339,000 13 Not Applicable Not Applicable 14 Not Applicable Not Applicable Committee Recommendation: The Committee recommends adoption of the proposed budgets for 1990-91, and adoption of the Gann limits. A detailed transmittal is contained in the enclosed, bound report. If any Director needs additional information, please call Gary Streed, Director of Finance, at (714) 962-2411. 2) Update on SCAQMD Proposed Regulation XIII: New -Source Review. At last month' s meeting, staff updated the Committee members on the status of several issues relating to air quality matters, including proposed revisions to Regulation XIII, New Source Review. Staff reported that the SCAQMD Board -3- Executive Committee Report June 27, 1990 would be considering the proposed revisions to Regulation XIII at a meeting the next day (June 28) and reviewed our Districts' concerns with the proposal utilizing the enclosed copy of the letter addressed to SCAQMD Board Chairman, A. Norton Younglove, and the presentation outline, which was endorsed by the Committee members. (NOTE: With minor changes, the ro osed revisions to Regulation XIII were adopted by the CAQMD Board on June 1. Therefore, the original s a f report has been modified herein and the following discussion details Regulation XIII In its adopted form and hus includes information not available at the time of the Executive committee meeting. Included in the existing New Source Review (NSR) regulations, as a requirement for obtaining a permit to construct new facilities, is a requisite to "offset" air emissions resulting from the project. Since this provision first applied to the Districts (for our Central Power Generation Project) , it has been our position that (Publicly Owned Treatment Works) POTW's should not be subject to the offset requirement since they provide a non-elective, essential public service which must be operated within the air basin to protect public health and water quality. We, along with our sister POTW's, advocated up to the last moment to either exempt POTW's or develop final rule language that would enable necessary wastewater treatment facilities to be constructed and protect the value of our existing emission reduction credits. We took a strong position that the SCAQMD should exempt essential public services from offsetting emissions from new facilities; and that the SCAQMD should not adopt any regulation that would jeopardize the value of existing credits acquired by the Districts with public funds, in good faith, to comply with the current regulations. For small businesses and essential public services the existing purchased and banked emission credit program will be replaced with a free "community bank" administered by SCAQMD. The community bank proposal includes a "priority reserve" of emission reduction credits for essential public services, including sewage treatment plants and landfills. The SCAQMD is assuming that the priority reserve system will contain sufficient offset credits to allow essential public services to construct new facilities. The SCAQMD staff report and supporting environmental analysis asserted there will be sufficient offsets based on a series of assumptions and projections. Under the proposed changes to Regulation XIII there was no guarantee of adequacy of the priority reserve and the community bank and its priority reserve depended upon the year-by-year attainment of basin-wide emission reduction goals. In the event that these goals were not achieved the community bank and priority reserve would have been "rolled-down" by 30%. As a result of comments by the Districts and other POTW's the roll-dam provision was eliminated for essential public services and a provision was addr;. to exempt essential. p,!blic services from offset requirements if tea priority reserve account is exhausted and the SCAQMD's Executive Officer-approves. This approval step adds a small degree of uncertainty to this safety net provision. _ -4- Executive Committee Report June 27, 1990 The purchased emission credits we now hold in reserve puts our Districts in a unique position. While a small portion of these credits will be discounted under the adopted regulation, there will still be an amount available to at least meet our needs for a decade or more. However, because the free priority reserve credits cannot be used by the Districts until we have used our existing banked credits and the adopted regulation revisions do not preclude the Districts from marketing our currently banked credits, the question of to sell or not to sell arises. These credits will become very scarce in the future so it is very likely they will be worth considerably more on the market than the Districts paid for them. Holding them has the advantage of giving us guaranteed offsets while the market price continues to increase. The question of profit vs. guarantee will be with us as long as we hold these credits. Staff and General Counsel are reviewing the issue and will report back to the Directors at a later date. We also recommended modifications to the proposed new Regulation XIII to remove offset, modeling and other restrictive requirements on the portable emergency equipment necessary to keep sewerage facilities in operation during emergency conditions. The SCAQMD Board took no action to address our concerns regarding portable equipment and adopted the portable equipment provisions without any further modification. We also pointed out the need to address situations where so-called best available control (BACT) technology fails. The SCAQMD Board did respond to our concern about failed-BACT and referred the matter to their Planning Committee (made up of members of the SCAQMD Board) to develop a better defined BACT and failed-BACT policy or regulation. 3) Request to Review District No. 1 Organization. Enclosed is a communication from Director Dan E. Griset, Santa Ana, to Joint Chairman Catlin, requesting a review of District No. 1's organization; and the Joint Chairman's reply, recommending that the matter be referred to the General Counsel and staff for a report on alternatives available to the Directors. Following a discussion of potential solutions, it was the consensus of the Committee Members that the District 1 Directors should attempt to resolve the issue, with assistance from the General Counsel and staff, but if any proposed resolution would affect other Districts it should be referred back to the Executive Committee. 4) Recommendations of the Fiscal Policy Committee. Fiscal Policy Committee Chairman Mahoney reported that the Committee had met on Friday, June 22nd at 4:00 p.m. in the afternoon to consider several items and reviewed the following recommendations: A. WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIM SETTLEMENT POLICY. The maximum claim value for most workers' compensation injuries is set by a Schedule of Benefits. In the case of disputed claims the Districts must currently -5- Executive Committee Report June 27, 1990 �.r go completely through the legal and courtroom process before an award can be made. The attorney for the Districts' third-party workers' compensation administrator has suggested that some time and money could be saved if there was some authority to execute a settlement agreement prior to trial. The Districts' General Counsel reviewed the issue and the enclosed draft policy. Committees' Recommendation: The Fiscal Policy Committee and Executive Committee recommend adoption of the proposed Workers' Compensation Claim Settlement Policy. B. EXCESS WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE. At the regular meeting on June 13, 1990 the Joint Boars of Directors authorized and directed the Fiscal Policy Committee to evaluate proposals obtained by the Districts' insurance broker and to place Excess Workers' Compensation Insurance effective July 1, 1990, to be presented to the Joint Boards for ratification or revision at the regular meeting on July 11, 1990. The Districts' current coverage and premium levels are: Self-Insured Amount of Coverage Retention (SIR) 1989-90 Premium Statutory $250,000 $31,835 (unlimited coverage) Coast Insurance Agency, the Districts' broker, has obtained a proposal for 1990-91 coverage for an estimated maximum premium of $36,257. The premium estimate Is based upon total budgeted salaries and will be adjusted at year-end when actual salaries are available. The 1990-91 budget includes $35,000 for excess loss Insurance. The recommended policy is a continuation of the existing policy at a slight increase 1n the rate per $100 of payroll . In large part the estimated premium increase from last year is a result of the additional positions authorized during the budget process and anticipated salary adjustments. A salary savings from unfilled positions of $850,000, approximately 4%, would reduce the estimated premium to the budget amount. Any actual premium in excess of the budget can be funded from accumulated reserves of $696,000. Committees' Recommendation: The Fiscal Policy Committee and th,: Executive Committee recommend that the Fiscal Policy Committee's act Ten In placing statutory Excess Workers' Compensation insurance coverage, wltu $250,000 self-insured retention, effective July 1, 1990, for an annual premium not to exceed $36,257.00, be ratified. -6- Executive Committee Report June 27, 1990 C. SELECTION OF UNDERWRITERS AND BOND COUNSEL FOR DEBT ISSUES. At the February meeting the Fiscal Policy Committee reviewed the alternatives of hiring an independent financial advisor or working directly with an underwriting fine to analyze and structure the Districts' long-range financing and borrowing program. After considerable discussion the Committee recommended the hiring of an underwriting firm to directly market debt issues and to provide financial advisory services. Because of an underwriting firm's daily contacts in the marketplace, they are expected to only recommend a borrowing package that will be readily accepted and purchased, which will result in reduced interest rates and costs. The Committee further recommended that staff be augmented to provide an in-house ability to interact in the bond market and to work directly with underwriters. The Executive Committee and the Joint Boards of Directors concurred with these recommendations and authorized solicitation of proposals from underwriters and special bond counsel. Based upon the above decision, a reorganization of the Finance Department including staff to provide ongoing support for the financing program was approved by the Committee in March. This staffing change was approved in advance of the 1990-91 personnel budget because of our imminent entry into the debt market. The Executive Committee concurred and forwarded the recommendation to the Joint Boards of Directors for adoption in April. The Districts are now recruiting and interviewing for the new Financial Manager's position. Enclosed with this report are the preliminary timetable and the Draft Request for Proposals for Underwriting Services for our initial entry into the debt market. The schedule is ambitious and calls for the borrowing process to be completed during the next four months in order to provide the needed funding for our master-planned construction program pursuant to the financial plan approved by the Boards last July. In order to streamline the process, staff recommended that RFP's be mailed to only a select group of prequalified underwriting firms. Firms recommended have been the leading underwriters in California municipal and/or sewer and water issues in 1989, have New York and California offices, and have clients in Orange County. Based on the criteria the Fiscal Policy Committee directed the staff to issue RFP's to the first five firms on the enclosed short list. The Committee is scheduled to interview the firms on July 18th. Also enclosed is a memorandum from the General Counsel regarding the selection of special bond counsel which is proposed to be accomplished in a manner similar to the selection of the underwriter. The Fiscal Policy Committee has directed the General Counsel to interview the two recommended firms for Districts' bond counsel and report back at the July 18th meeting. The Committee also determined that the Districts' - should reserve the right to approve the underwriting firm's bond counsel . -7- Executive Committee Report June 27, 1990 Chairman Mahoney advised that the status report was for the Executive Committee's information and that no action was required at this time. The Fiscal Policy Committee will submit recommendations to the Executive Committee on selection of an underwriter and bond counsel at its meeting on July 25th. D. REVISIONS TO MANAGEMENT VEHICLE POLICY. In 1973, upon the recommendation of a Special Directors' Committee on Compensation of Department Heads, the Boards adopted the County of Orange policy for leasing vehicles for management personnel . Since that time the County's policy has been modified on several occasions, but the Districts' policy has remained unchanged. The enclosed separate report recommending revisions to the Districts' Management Vehicle Policy was considered at the May joint meeting of the Executive Committee and the Fiscal Policy Committee and was referred to the Fiscal Policy Committee for further review and recommendati on. Committees' Recommendation: The Fiscal Policy Committee and the Executive Committee recommend that the proposed revised policy for furnishing vehicles for management personnel be approved. JWS:sc Encl. -8- V - "°'n""°° COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS f OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 108"ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714) 988-2411 June 22 , 1990 Mr. A. Norton Younglove Chairman South Coast Air Quality Management District 9150 Flair Drive El Monte, CA 91731 Subject: Opposition to Proposed Regulation XIII: New Source Review Dear Chairman Younglove: The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Sanitation Districts) represent 24 communities serving two million people. The mission of the Sanitation Districts is to protect public health and to preserve environmental quality. We have long supported clean air goals. Our new 30-year Facilities Master Plan, adopted by our Boards of Directors in 1989 , reaffirms our commitment to mitigate cross-media (air, land and water) impacts of construction and operation of our wastewater treatment plants. Our activities have and will continue to be based on best control technology and a holistic approach to total environmental management. While we believe that water quality and air quality goals can often be simultaneously achieved, there are situations when one set of emerging environmental protection regulations results in significant conflicts with other equally important environmental protection goals. The Proposed Regulation XIII is such a situation. Proposed Regulation XIII will severely jeopardize our ability to reliably protect water quality and provide essential wastewater management services for our communities. Therefore, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County oppose the adoption of Proposed Regulation XIII and strongly urge that you reject it in its present form. New Source Review (NSR) is a major South Coast Air Qualit} Management District (SCAQMD) program for the control of air pollution from new or modified facilities. If will have significant affects on the Sanitation Districts ' wastewater treatment facilities construction and maintenance activities. ` Qy COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUMY. CALIFORNIA vM BOX z+zv wuxraw ve4Er.CGLIwNHie 92J29.8+27 01.19a22e11 Mr. A. Norton Younglove June 22, 1990 Page Two The Sanitation Districts, along with representatives of other publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) , have been involved in workshops and meetings with SCAQMD staff since last year. we have actively participated as members of the SCAQMD's interagency AQMP Implementation Committee and its Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) . While SCAQMD staff has become increasingly sensitive to the concerns of the POTWIG, there still remain several key issues which, if not resolved, could impair the Sanitation Districts' ability to obtain permits to construct needed water pollution control facilities. All of our key issues of concern were last discussed with SCAQMD staff in a meeting held on June 4, 1990 with Pat Nemeth (Deputy Executive Officer-Planning and Rules) , her staff, and members of the TAC. The provisions of Regulation XIII that continue to concern the Sanitation Districts are as follows: A. Offset Requirements for Essential Public Services B. The Operation of Portable Equipment by Essential Public Services C. The Need for a Provision to Address Failed BACT A discussion of each of these issues follows. A. OFFSET REQUIREMENTS FOR ESSENTIAL PUBLIC SERVICES: The Sanitation Districts oppose offset requirements of any kind for essential public services. Our Districts' Boards of Directors are previously on record that any requirement for public agencies that provide essential services (health and safety) to produce emission offset credits is an inappropriate expenditure of public funds; and of their intent to seek legislative relief if Regulation XIII is not revised. Thus, we strongly urge you to exempt essential public services from offset requirements for the reasons discussed below. The Ademuacv of the Priority Reserve Account for Essential Public Services Proposed Rule 1309.1 Regulation XIII establishes the use of a "priority reserve" account for emission offset credits that SCAQMD would administer and would allocate to essential public services. These provisions are complex, contradictory and fail to provide reliable and predictable offset allowances for essential public services. The emission offset credit bank administered by SCAQMD COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 11120a ELLIS AVENUE "a BOX 8122 FOUNTAIN VPUFY.CAUMRNIA 927213.8127 Mr. A. Norton Younglove June 22, 1990 Page Three is unworkable and may prevent essential public services from providing the facilities necessary to accommodate the growth projections approved by the Southern California Association of Governments (SLAG) and SCAQMD. A '-community bank" is proposed by the SCAQMD to allow small businesses and essential public services to locate or modify in the air basin without impeding progress toward clean air standards. A "priority reserve" is established in the community bank to provide credits for essential public services that include sewage treatment plants, prisons, police and fire- fighting facilities, schools, hospitals and landfills. However, the sufficiency of the priority reserve account is in question. According to Section 1309.1(i) , the amount of offset credits funding level maximum shall not exceed the following: Quarterly (Calendar) Allocation Air Contaminant Pounds Per Day Reactive Organic Gases 500 Nitrogen Oxides 250 Particulates 125 Sulfur Dioxide 60 Carbon Monoxide 250 These are maximum, not guaranteed, available offset credits. There is considerable uncertainty about the actual available offset credits in the community bank and the priority reserve because they will be funded by the actual offset credits gathered throughout the air basin that are not otherwise used in third- party trades and which are discounted to provide for overall emission reductions in the basin. Adding further to the uncertainty of available offset credits is the requirement that the funding level maximum will be adjusted downward, if the air basin as a whole fails to achieve its five percent per year reduction target. SCAQMD staff have estimated the future funding and demand levels of the community bank and priority reserve. In their staff report dated May 1990, SCAQMD predicts that the funding levels `E✓ for CO and ROG are clearly adequate but that the funding levels for NOX, SOX and particulates will be 11. . . marginal at best. -- For the Sanitation Districts, it appears that ROG will be the COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS M ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA PQ BOX 127 fOUN! 1 1 R �1>W V1YFY,M CPt1ipPNIP 9iY18.121 Mr. A. Norton Younglove June 22, 1990 Page Four major pollutant of concern with respect to required offsets. Therefore, if SCAQMD staff's projections of supply and demand are accurate, then the ROG in the community bank and priority reserve may be adequate to offset to our needs in the future. Limited Access to the Priority Reserve Account: Proposed Amended Rule 1309 1(e) (3) (A) and (e) (31 (B1 and (a) our ability to access the priority reserve is limited because Proposed Rule 1309.1(g) requires that " . . . if a subject facility holds an emission reduction credit then that ERC must be used before access to the community bank is allowed. " According to this section, the Sanitation Districts would have to utilize our purchased emission credits first before being allowed to tap the community bank. Because of the Sanitation Districts' responsible planning efforts over the last five years, we presently. own and have banked ERCs purchased at considerable expenditure of public funds. It is imperative that the Sanitation Districts and their tax/rate payers not be penalized for their prudent foresight to comply with the existing SCAQMD regulations. If Regulation XIII is adopted, it would imply an unconscionable misuse of public funds if it were to require the Sanitation Districts to not have equal access to priority reserves simply because we have acted responsibly in the past, or to limit in any way our ability to market our currently banked reserves. Rule 1309. 1(e) (3) (A) and (B) of Regulation XIII may prevent the Sanitation Districts and other essential public services from adequately accessing the priority reserve of the community bank as follows: "offsets for essential public services are available from the reserve account provided that "such equipment is used to provide essential public services" (and the applicant) "has provided all required offsets available by modifying sources owned (by the applicant) or has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Executive Officer that the applicant owns or operates n2 facilities within the district which could be modified to provide offsets." (emphasis added) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS AI GRANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA IOBAA Ews AVENUE ea 80x 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.MIMPNIA M729-8121 I11CUMAn Mr. A. Norton Younglove June 22, 1990 Page Five This section is totally unrealistic because it is far too open- ended, indefinite, subject to vastly different interpretations, and may prevent the Sanitation Districts and other large essential public service agencies to tap the priority reserve. what this section does is make every piece of equipment owned by the Sanitation Districts subject to constantly changing BACT requirements in trade for our access to the priority reserve. - The Sanitation Districts' staff sees this as an unending chase of technology. To demonstrate the absurdity of this section, consider the County of Los Angeles, which holds permits for hospitals, landfills, pump stations, fire houses and countless other essential public services. This section would imply that, in the very least, the County would have to inventory every piece of equipment, every facility, and report to the Executive Officer about the practicality of applying new controls to the equipment to meet the conditions of this section every time an application is submitted. At worst, it would require the wholesale changeover of equipment to achieve BACT standards each time 'the County needs to access the priority reserve. This is obviously an unworkable provision which further weakens the concept of priority reserve of the community bank. Rolling Down the Priority Reserve Account Maximum Level: Proposed Amended Rule 1310. (b) (2) According to this section, if the emission goals for the air basin are not met for a particular air contaminant then the community bank allocation for that contaminant: 11 . . shall be reduced for that air contaminant by 30% and rounded down to the nearest pound. If the emission goals for the previous calendar year are exceeded for any air contaminant, the community bank allocation and the priority reserve may be increased for that contaminant by 75% of the goal exceedance. " (emphasis added) L.E.' It is unacceptable to place essential public services in this tenuous position and perhaps unable to carry out their mission. As an example, consider ROGs which are the pollutants of concern for most future wastewater facilities. While a one-time 30% COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA 109Y EWE AVENUE IM EIXt 8127 FOUNTAIN VAUFY.CAUFOPMA 92MO4127 n1u9922A11 Mr. A. Norton Younglove June 22, 1990 Page Six rollback of the community bank may not affect the POTWs' ability to receive sufficient offset credits for ROGs (assuming the SCAQMD's projections of supply and demand are correct) , if the priority reserve was reduced for a second or third time because of the inability of the air basin to achieve its air emission reduction of goals, then the priority reserve account would be insufficient. The restrictions on the access to and the maximum amount of the priority reserve defeats its original purpose of providing sufficient offsets for essential public services. POTWs should not be placed in this condition of uncertainty. Emission credits and Balances for Essential Public services: Proposed Amended Rule 1306. (a) (4) According to this section, " . . . essential public services eligible for the priority reserve shall not include emission increases or decreases occurring at the facility prior to three months after the date of the amended rule in the NSR balance. " This section is good news and bad news for the POTWs, landfills and other essential public services operating in the South Coast Air Basin. This contradiction provides another weakness of the priority reserved account concept and reinforces the argument for an exemption from offset requirements for essential public services. This section provides a "clean slate" for essential public services. For some essential public services, their existing emission balance is high and so the clean slate provision is helpful. However, in the case of the Sanitation Districts, we have done so much to improve air quality over the last few years that we actually have achieved a favorable credit balance by reducing our emissions for most criteria pollutants. And so, for the Sanitation Districts, this "clean slate" provision amounts to the confiscation by SCAQMD of 215 pounds-per-day of carbon monoxide offset credits that could otherwise be applied to naw facilities. There would also be lesser amounts of offset emission credits that would be lost for oxides of nitrogen and reactive organic gases. SCAQMD staff indicated to the TAC on June 4 that they recognize the problem with this section and are prepared to rewrite it so that essential public services will get emission reduction credits (discounted by 80%) resulting from �..� shutdowns. As of June 19, 1990, this proposed rewrite has not reached our office. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA I I 9wsAWNu2 �I 00.90%9129 10U 74WN VLLLEY.ULIMANIA 92729.9127 n141962.2411 Mr. A. Norton Younglove June 22, 1990 Page Seven Shutting Down New Essential Public Service Facilities When Initial Offsets Are Not Enough: Proposed Amended Rule 1313 . (C) Another fault in the concept of offset requirements for essential public services occurs in this section which specifies that: " . a permit to operate will be denied if it is determined that actual emissions are greater than previously calculated when the Permit to Construct was issued unless additional offsets are obtained within ninety days after notice from the Executive Officer that offsets are required to mitigate the increase." The Sanitation Districts and members of TAC indicated to SCAQMD staff on June 4 that this time period is insufficient because access to the priority reserve of the community bank is made on the basis of "first come, first serve". It is quite conceivable that an essential public service agency would be unable to deliver on this ninety-day provision and, therefore, would be prevented from operating new essential public service facilities because of an inability to quickly access the public reserve account. B. THE OPERATION OF PORTABLE EQUIPMENT BY ESSENTIAL PUBLIC SERVICES: The proposed requirements of Regulation XIII for portable equipment used by essential public services for either emergency or non-elective preventative maintenance are totally unworkable and fail to recognize the extremely important need and nature of emergency portable equipment required to assure continuous operation of essential public services facilities. The Sanitation Districts, therefore, oppose these provisions and strongly urge that they be rejected. Rule 1304 (a) (3) provides that upon approval by the Executive Officer, an exemption from new source review shall be allowed for portable equipment provided best available control technology (BACT) is utilized and that: " . such equipment is portable, is periodically relocated, and is not- used more than ninety days at any one location in "NEW provisions district within a twelve-month period. The full provisions of Rule 1303 (which requires modeling of the emission offsets of any emission increase, full compliance of an essential public service with all applicable rules and COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Al ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10a"EW6 AVENUE V.a.BOX 6127 ECUNTAiN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92726.8127 01A1662.2A11 Mr. A. Norton Younglove June 22, 1990 Page Eight regulations of the SCAQMD and compliance with federal requirements for new sources) shall apply to the initial location of such equipment. " This is no exemption at all! It requires that the portable equipment that the Sanitation Districts utilize for emergency repairs and non-elective preventative maintenance repairs will be modeled and offset as though the equipment was housed and used at our storage yard at the Fountain Valley treatment plant. In addition, a permit to operate the portable equipment will be denied by SCAQMD if any of the Sanitation Districts ' facilities are out-of-compliance for any reason according to Rule 1303.(b) (3) , even though it would be totally unrelated to the use or impacts of the portable equipment. - We have argued that it makes no technical sense to model the emissions of portable equipment at one site in Fountain Valley and then use the equipment throughout Orange County under conditions totally unrelated to the conditions at the storage site. SCAQMD staff have countered that their only other alternative is to require that we model the emissions of our portable equipment every time that it is moved to a new remote site. This, of course, is totally impractical because our portable equipment is used for emergencies and preventative maintenance repairs which are planned on a very short-term basis and are often at any particular site for a day or less. With over 30 portable equipment units in use, the amount of staff time necessary to model emissions and prepare reports would make the whole notion impossible to achieve. While the Sanitation Districts agree with the need to apply BACT to portable equipment, the other features of this proposed amended rule are simply unworkable and unnecessary. In a closely related section on emergencies (Proposed Amended Rule 1304 . (a) (7) ) , there are provisions for exemptions for emergency operations. The language of this section may be under revision by SCAQMD staff in partial response to our discussions with them on June 4. The Sanitation Districts recommend that the language of this section be expanded to include 11 . . the emergency or non- elective preventative maintenance repairs to facilities operated as an essential public service. 11 Declaration of an emergency could, as an example, be done by the Sanitation Districts ' �..� General Manager. SCAQMb staff indicated that perhaps a Letter of Agreement or MOU could be created and signed by the Executive COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA A".SOX BR] wu"rAw vauEr."M.W axrzes+zr n,Ai aex.aA,i Mr. A. Norton Younglove June 22, 1990 Page Nine Officer of SCAQMD and the General Manager of the Sanitation Districts that would define what an emergency is and what notification procedure would be utilized. While this feature may help us with respect to the portable equipment that is used exclusively for emergencies, it would not cover the majority of our equipment which is used for both emergency and non-elective preventative maintenance activities. Therefore, we believe that an exemption provision should extend also to non-elective preventative maintenance for essential public services. The determination that preventative maintenance is necessary to protect public health and the environment should be the determination of the manager of the essential public service agency. C. THE NEED FOR A PROVISION TO ADDRESS FAILED BACT The Sanitation Districts believe that SCAQMD must provide for the possibility of failed best available control technology (BACT) for essential public services facilities and strongly urge that you incorporate such a provision in Regulation XIII. One issue that has not been adequately addressed in New Source Review, or in other previous or currently applicable SCAQMD rules, is "failed BACT. " It is clearly the position of the SCAQMD Board to promulgate "technology-forcing rules" to move the air basin toward improved air quality. While this is certainly an effective strategy, the Sanitation Districts' staff are concerned that a new technology mandated by regulatory fiat may prove to be unachievable or only partially achievable. This has already occurred. As an example, selective catalytic converters required for digester-gas fired engines in the mid-198Os proved unworkable. The contaminates in the digester gas poisoned the platinum-based catalyst and rendered it totally ineffective in reacting with NOX. Therefore, it is imperative that the Sanitation Districts and other essential public services maintain the ability to operate new facilities even though the original conditions of. the permit to construct those facilities are unachievable for reasons beyond the control of the essential public service agency. So-called BACT, if ultimately found to be inadequate, must not be the reason for interrupting the operation at an essential public service. As it was pointed out on June 4, a "failed BACT" provision must be addressed by SCAQMD for the sake of maintaining important essential public services. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA ,aW E S G ENUE ( / v a.Box a,27 �I f WMN"UEY.CAUFMW 9272.'" GMSM-zan Mr. A. Norton Younglove June 22, 1990 Page Ten Thank you for the opportunity to address Proposed Regulation xiii. We believe that our comments are in the best overall interests of our common concerns. As always, we stand prepared to continue our long-standing cooperative efforts with SCAQMD toward our mutual environmental and public health protection goals. For this reason, we would be pleased to discuss our positions and comments in further detail. If you have any questions or would like further information, please contact Mr. Blake Anderson, our Director of Technical- 'Services. P . WaIv :Sylvester General Manager JWS/BPA/ahh REF#O10O72.LTR cc: A. Norton Younglove, Chairman Henry W. Wedaa, Vice Chairman Michael D. Antonovich, Supervisor, Los Angeles County Stephen Albright, Governor's Appointee Dr. Larry Berg, Speaker of Assembly Appointee Carole Beswick, Mayor Pro Tem, City of Redlands Marvin. Braude, Councilman, City of Los Angeles Robert L. Hammock, Supervisor, county of San Bernardino Henry Morgan, Councilman, City of Covina Sabrina Schiller, Senate Rules Committee Appointee Harriett Wieder, Supervisor, County of Orange S. Roy Wilson, Councilman, City of Palm Desert James M. Lents, Ph.D. , Executive Officer Pat 1:emeth, Deputy Executive Officer-Planning & Rules Jackie Dix, Clerk of the Board Y tt ® RIANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS' OBJECTIVE: TO RELIABLY: PLAN , CONSTRUCT, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES TO : MEET SERVICE DEMANDS, PROTECT PUBLIC HEALTH , PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT SCAQM ® OBJECTIVE: SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE AIR EMISSIONS TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH CAA BY 2007 R®GS FOR EXAMPLE : YEAR 1990 350 TONS/DAY EMISSIONS 150 TONS/ DAY UNUSED CREDITS YEAR 2007 40 TONS/DAY EMISSIONS REGULATION X091 : NEW SOURCE REVIEW ORIGINAL VERSION 1976 SEVERAL REVISIONS SINCE * DISCUSSING 4 YEARS * NONE RULES ONGOING DIALOGUE WITH SCAQMD RECENT CHANGES BY SCAQMD HEARING STET FOR JUNE 28 DELAY IS QUITE LIKELY KEY FEATURES APPLIES TO ALL NEW OR MODIFIED STATIONARY SOURCES AND PORTABLE EQUIPMENT ® SACT MUST BE USED ALL NEW INCREASES MUST BE OFFSET INDUSTRY: OFFSET 1976 - 199® INCREASES o POTWS: "CLEAN SLATE" * PURCHASED EPCS STILL GOOD SCAOM ® ADMINISTERS A "COMMUNITY SAND" AND " PRIORITY RESERVE" A. OFFSET REQUiREMENT FOR ESSENTIAL PUBLIC ■• i '.r . REQUIRESERVICES ALL NEW INCREASES OFFSETS ARE SUPPOSEDLY ice' -' ' i ' ,; t TAKEN t' CARE OF BY " PRIORITY ■' 'fir L Ell * FUNDING DEPENDS ON FUTURE OFFSETS ! ; ,., USED TRADESIN 3RD PARTY f: MUST COVERDEMANDS PUBLICFROM ALL ESSENTIAL SERVICES f BASIN THERE IS A QUARTERLY CAP NO ACCESS •.. t UNTIL 1 E FIRST USE OUR OWN ERCS ® NO ACCESS IF WE HAVEN 'T PROVIDED ALL OTHER REQUIRED OR POSSIBLE OFFSETS FIRST THE QUARTERLY CAP WILL BE ROLLED DOWN 30% EACH YEAR BASIN FAILS GOALS AND : PTO DENIED IF ACTUAL EMISSIONS GREATER THAN CALCULATED AND OFFSETS NOT OBTAINED IN J® DAYS KEY THINGS TO REMEMBER ABOUT WASTEWATER TREATMENT: o WE CAN 'T RELOCATE 0 60% OF POPULATION GROWTH IS IN-COUNTY BIRTHS ® WE ARE AN ESSENTIAL PUBLIC SERVICE a WE AREN 'T A COMPANY ELECTIVELY MAKING "WIDGETS" o WHAT WE ®® IS NON- ELECTIVE o OUR FUTURE CONSTRUCTION ACCOMMODATES SLAG & SCAQMD REGIONAL PLANNING WHY ARE THE SANITATION DISTRICTS OPPOSING REG XI11? A. OFFSET REQUIREMENTS FOR ESSENTIAL PUBLIC SERVICE D . NSR PROVISIONS FOR PORTABLE EQUIPMENT C . NEED FOR A PROVISION TO ADDRESS FAILED DACT R . NSR PROVISIONS FOR .. PORTABLE EQUIPMENT WHAT SCAQMD PROPOSES : ® BACT REQUIRE® * OFFSET EMISSION INCREASE MODEL EMISSIONS AT STORAGE YARD AND DEMONSTRATE NO VIOLATION ® FULL COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE RULES & REGS B. NSR PROVISIONS FOR PORTABLE EQUIPMENT WHAT CS ®®C PROPOSE: BACT REQUIRE® C. THE NEED TO ADDRESS FAILED RACT SCAQMD'S SACT POLICY: ® TECH OLOGY-FORCING RULES ® LONG-TERM COMPLIANCE SCHEDULES * APPLIES TO A VARIETY OF POLLUTANTS FROM A VARIETY OF SOURCES ® APPLIES TO NEW AND EXISTING SOURCES ® APPLIES TO VIRTUALLY EVERYTHING WE WILL DO C. THE NEED TO ADDRESS FAILED BACT WHAT CSDOC SUGGEST: ® CONTINUE WITH EXISTING BACT POLICY BUT ADD PROVISIONS THAT: a ALLOW US TO CONTINUE OPERATION IN EVENT BACT DOESN 'T WORK OR FALLS SHORT AND: ® ORDERLY AMEND ORIGINAL BACT REQUIREMENTS JUN-14-IQW 1133:177� PRUI GR�IISbETT}OOF�F7I�tC'EVS7}� TO %20356 P.02i02 IDAMM E. CouncUmember sa North Dole®CWe Dr" Suitt as SMM Amm,Comm[. 92M rtlepCeuu fn43 03u0= n.n:A&4 M4)asw33st Via Ea 'mile June 13, 1990 W. Buck Catlin, Joint Chair ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 108" Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728 RE: District One Dear Buck: I have been concerned with the numerical membership of the District One board From time to time,we have been unable to transact District business because of tie votes. With only four members, such circumstances are not unexpected and, to be sure, not desirable. I am writing now to ask for your assistance in finding ways to correct this problem by increasing the District's directors and thus avoid the delays brought by tie votes. Perhaps our Counsel and other appropriate staff can look at this problem and develop some alternatives for consideration. I should indicate that my City Attorney, Ed Cooper, is available to assist in any appropriate way. As you know, Santa Ana residents and businesses form nearly the entire population of District One. Vly yours, Daniel E. Griset Director, District One DEG/pd cc: Ed Cooper COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 �I 10844 ECUs.FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714)9622411 FAX(714)1162-0366 June 19, 1990 Director Dan Griset 540 North Golden Circle Drive Suite 304 Santa Ana, California 92705 - Subject: County Sanitation District No. 1 Dear Dan: In response to your communication of June 13th I have asked staff to include your letter as an item on the Executive Committee agenda for its regular meeting on June 27th. I am recommending that your request be referred to the General Counsel and staff for a report on alternatives that could be considered by the Directors. You are invited to attend the Executive Committee meeting an June 27th to present your request and participate in the discussion on this and other agenda items. The Executive Committee meeting notice and supporting agenda material will be mailed to you under separate cover. Sincerely, A. B_ "Buck" Catlin Joint Chairman ABC:sc cc: James A. Wahner, District 1 Chairman/Costa Mesa Sanitary District Richard B. Edgar, District 1 Director/Tustin Roger R. Stanton, District 1 Director/County Board of Supervisors J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Thomas L. Woodruff, General Coun•_I r mo, LUHsI IrSUNunR r. COAST Insurance Agency AGfNFS AND BROKERS FAX 213 207-4792 TO: GARY STREED FROM: DICK BECKENDORP DATE: JLNE 14,1990 REGARDING: EXCESS WORKERS COMPENSATION NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER PAGE) 1 SPECIAL NOTES OR MESSAGE: GARY, WE HAVE BEEN ABLE TO REDUCE PREVICUSLY QUOTED PREMIUCIS SOMEWHAT. USE THE FOLLOWING: 1. Primary Coverage, rate of $.1479 and premium deposit of $31,400. 2. Excess, a flat premium of $4500. eat twve need 13 Ciga charge to be added. R.P.Beekendorf 11611 Son Vicente Boulevard Sulle 720 Los Angeles. California 90049 (213)679-0614 E :pp CAPS' IN3URANCE 6 COAST Insurance Agency AGENTS AND SRORERS PAX 213 207-4792 T0: GARY STREED FROM: DICK BECKENDORF DATE: June 13, 1990 RECA.RDINC:EXCFSS WORKERS COMPENSATION NUMBER OF PACES (INCLUDING COVER PACE) : 2 SPECIAL NOTES OR MESSACE: GARY, HERD ARE YUMBERS "LOU CAN USE FOR THE EXCESS WCRKERS COMPENSATIaN; Primary- General Reinsurance co. will provide '!Ten Million coverage in excess of a $250,000. SIR at a rate of $•151 per hundred of payroll which extends out to $32,240. plus $322. in Ciga charges. Excess- with Firemenu Fund for unlimited coverage. They are talking about $5000. premi.un plus $50. Ciga charge, but we are hoping to get it lower than that. It was $4000. last year. I WILL HAVE A FIRM FIGURE ON THIS ASAP, BUT YCU COULD SAFELY USE THE $5000. figure. I Am enclosing a copy of an interesting article regarding workers comp. coverage in general. Rates are going up because of the claims and this article discusses reinsurance importance, etc. You would be happy to know that the two carriers quoted above are among the very best. Incidentally rEmployers Reinsurance was not interested this year in giving us a price at a competative level. Call me if you have any questions on this. I will advise seep on a better Firemen Fund rate if we can get it. Meanwhile I suggest you use what I have quoted above since I know una'_ we can get that. 11611 Pan vlcanfe Boulavord Was 720 Los Angeles, Cc0cir.lo 90049 (213)879,0614 FROM COAST IHSURRHCE r ` CRITTENDEN �WORKERS COMPENSATION REPORT CPoTTENDEN B951NESS NEWS,ING P.O.BOX1150 NOW0,CA94948 (415)2822425 (800)421.3483 --- ---' ----' —'— Jun2 2 1990 TIME BOMB The rising tide of big dollar workers' comp claims ewid easily swamp some primary writers if they continue to go with inadequate reimura ice. The Workers' Compensation Reinsurance Bureau, a pool of leading terriers, warns that some small carriers risk their own futures by carrying too little reinsurance. Sin is easo claims of-$500 000 or mope n I common in this liti io e. The ong term eo ut on is better management and cost containment. The short term solution is more reinsurance, and many carriers don't have enough. Primary insurers commonly go for $3 million to $10 million in reinsurance but few plan for major single claims exceeding $10 million. Claims that big can arise from a single auto accident. Thep may be rare but carriers who don't provide for the big hits may end up in a vat of red ink. The WCRB is a major treaty reinsurance pool that includes market makers such as Continental, CNA, Reliance, USF&G, and Zurich American. One reason for the low levels of reinsurance may be that primary carriers and reinsurers can't agree on attachment points. Reinsurers typically want higher attachment points so as to keep themselves out of harm way. Primary carriers push for lower attachment levels. WCRB reinsures excess workers' comp losses starting at $500,000. It sets no specific per person maximums. WCRB rejects high hazard risks such as explosives manufacturing and underground coal mining. The pool follows its own advice by increasing the reinsurance it purchases. It buys reinsurance excess of $16 million up to $268 million per occurrence. The pool's major sources for its reinsurance include Prudential Re, Lloyd's, CIGNA plus Duncanson & Holt. The pool addressee the industrywide problem of cost containment through a task force studying ideas to help carriers deal with soaring medical claims. Major reinsurers who also back workers' comp risks include General Re, National Re, Employers Re, American Accident Reinsurance Group, St. - au , an t e- merman Line Slip.. - ---- - - --- — - --- - - June 12, 1990 DRAFT COVER LETTER Underwriter Services Requests for Proposals The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) are seeking proposals from qualified all-purpose debt underwriting firms. This letter is intended to provide notice to your firm of the opportunity to be considered for this role. Similar letters are being sent to a number of firms which we believe may also be interested in serving as the underwriter for impending borrowing. CSDOC intends to enter into an agreement with a qualified firm offering ongoing financial advisory and underwriting services commencing approximately August of 1990. Any agreement would be subject to termination by either party upon appropriate written notice. CSDOC is responsible for collecting, treating and disposing of wastewater for the more than two million people and businesses in metropolitan Orange County. CSDOC has recently prepared and adopted a 30-year Wastewater Management Master Plan which includes a Financial Plan. Projects currently under study, to be constructed through the year 2020, total approximately $1.5 billion based on 1989 dollars. On that same basis it is anticipated that aggregate security sales could approach $500-700 million. CSDOC may borrow on a competitive or negotiated basis and may also issue variable rate demand obligations, commercial paper, and certificates of participation. Scope of Service The firm selected will be required to provide the following base level services and other general advisory services as may be requested from time-to-time: 1. Assist in updating CSDOC financial strategies and policies. This includes analyzing short-, intermediate- and long-term financing requirements and options. 2. Advise on the timing, method, amount and structure of security sales. 3. Assist with the preparation and review of documents necessary for the sale of securities and the investment of the proceeds thereof. 4. Assist in coordination with CSDOC's General Counsel and Special Counsel to ensure applicable laws, regulations, and guidelines relating to security offerings are followed. FIN/MISC/RFP1. 1 Page 2 5. Assist in interfacing with rating agencies with the .� objective of maintaining or improving the high ratings assigned outstanding securities. 6. Assist in reviewing and analyzing legislation that may have a financial impact on the CSDOC. 7. Upon request, attend meetings and make presentations and recommendations to the Board of Directors, its committees, and staff. 8 . Provide information, judgments, and forecasts regarding general economic, and capital market conditions. 9. Review draft financial reports or interim statements prior to publication. 10. Upon request, prepare special studies of a financial nature and review new financial programs or techniques which may be proposed to staff. 11. Serve as senior or lead underwriter for required CSDOC borrowing. CSDOC reserves the right to recommend or approve underwriter's counsel and to engage the services of an independent pricing agent in negotiating sales of its securities. Additional Information The following materials are attached to this Request for Proposal and are intended to provide you with relevant factual information about the CSDOC: (a) Request for Proposal Instructions. (b) Official Statement for the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2 and 3 of Orange County, California $117,000,000 Certificates of Participation Joint Facilities Project of July 1986, the most recent issue. (c) The 1988-89 Annual Financial Report. (d) A summary report from the 30-;rear Master Plan/Financial Plan. CSDOC will review proposals received ar: select from three to six firms to be interviewed. The criteria used for evaluation and selection are the components ennumerated in the instructions, thoroughness and brevity of the proposal. FIN/MISC/RFP1.2 Page 3 CSDOC reserves the right to reject any or all submittals and to waive irregularities in any submittal if that is determined to be in the best interest of the CSDOC. CSDOC may request additional information from any of the firms submitting proposals. CSDOC shall not be responsible for the costs incurred in submitting a proposal or any other cost incurred should an interview opportunity be offered your firm. The interviews may take place either during the day or in the evening at the CSDOC Administrative Offices at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. I£ you have questions about the CSDOC or the process described herein, please call Director of Finance, Gary Streed, at (714) 962-2411. Please limit your questions to matters relating to the CSDOC and this proposal process. Any matters relating to the qualifications of your firm should be raised only in the proposal or the interview. Firms not chosen for the interview process or as final candidates of the negotiation and selection process will be so notified. Attachments FIN/MISC/RFP1 .3 June 12, 1990 D R A F T i UNDERWRITING SERVICES REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS To achieve a uniform review process and obtain the maximum degree of comparability, it is requested that an original plus ten copies of your proposal be tabbed and organized as follows: 1. Letter of Transmittal 2. Title Page Show the RFP subject, name of the proposer's firm, address, telephone number, name of contact person and date proposal submitted. 3. Table of Contents Clearly identify the material by section and page number. 4. Required Components of Proposal a) Type of Issue: Provide a preliminary recommendation as to the type of debt issue the CSDOC might undertake. Support this recommendation by identifying any unique features which may exist at CSDOC that could be best taken advantage of by your recommended type of issue. Explain how this initial debt issue might impact future issues. b) Professional Services: Furnish a brief but complete description of the professional services which will be performed in your capacity as underwriter, if selected. Furnish a realistic time frame with identification of major milestones associated with the recommended type of issue above. (See preliminary CSDOC schedule attached) . c) Knowledge ofMarket: Furnish specific information, demonstrating your firm's knowledge of and relationship with the investment community, that would allow CSDOC to structure its debt issuance to take advantage of current market trends. d) Ratings: Explain how your firm would assist the CSDOC in maintaining or improving the excellent rating from Moody's and Standard & Poor's that was obtained for the 1986 COP issue. FIN/MISC/RFP2. 1 Page 2 e) Total Cost: Based upon your recommended type of �. borrowing, provide a detailed estimate of the costs of your services in connection with the CSDOC's issue, and your best estimate of all other costs and services to be provided by other firms and institutions in connection with such an issue. Assume some combination of individual Districts need $75 to $100 million to undertake capital projects in the very near future. f) Proposed Team: Identify the members of the professional staff who will work on this account including their normal work location. Include resumes for each listed individual in the appendix. The individual(s) responsible for the day-to-day relationship with CSDOC should be clearly identified. Such individual(s) must participate in the interview if your firm is selected as a finalist. g) References: Provide three references where similar services were provided. Include a description of the borrowing, name, and telephone number of the issuer's representative, and what role your currently proposed staff played in that issue. h) Additional Information: Include any additional information, including your policy regarding EEO and your affirmative action plan and related workforce data, which you feel demonstrates your ability to serve in our long-term debt program. The total body of your proposal shall be limited to no more than 35 pages. CSDOC's selection of an underwriter will be based upon your responses to the aforementioned components, appropriately weighted. The selection of an Underwriter will adhere to the following schedule PROPOSAL SCHEDULE Date Agenda June 21, 1990 Mail RFP to qualified firms. July 10, 1990 Proposals due at CSDOC. July 18, 1990 Conduct interviews with potential firms. August 8, 1990 Board approval of selected firm. FIN/MISC/RFP2 .2 Page 3 CSDOC reserves the right to reject all proposals and terminate, modify or postpone the borrowing process. Proposals will be accepted until 5:00 p.m. July 10, 1990 at the District Administration Office, 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, CA 92708, Attention: Gary G. Streed. Mailed proposals must be clearly marked. Ten ( 10) copies are requested. Enclosures FIN/MISC/RFP2.3 6/12190 PRELIMINARY BORROWING SCHEDULE ' JUNE July AUG SEPT OCT FPC Review/Approval of Procedures Jun-20 Issue Request for Proposals Jun-21 Receive Proposals Jul-10 FPC Evaluates Proposals end Interviews Underwriters and Counsel Jul-IB Executive Committee Considers FPC Recommendations Jul-25 Boards Award Contracts for Underwriters and Counsel Aug-8 Present Proposed Borrowing Package to Each District's Board for Consideration/Approval Sep-12 Presentations to Rating Agencies Sep-19 Preliminary Official Statement Reedy Sep-28 Preliminary Pricing and Review Oct-8 Board Approval of Sale Oct-11 Closing/Receipt of 6o9e Oct-25 DEBifINMIB 2:JB PN June 14, 1990 POTENTIAL UNDERWRITERS 1989 California 1989 California Municipal Issues Water & Sewer Issues Firm Lead Syndicate Lead Syndicate Primary Short List M 1 ons Issues lions Issues Millions Issues illionM s Issues Smith Barney $1,222.9 36 $2,239.3 47 $ 49.9 3 $ 49.9 3 Merrill-Lynch 1,205.9 27 3,052.5 41 397.8 9 592.2 11 Paine Webber 1,249.3 25 1,888.6 37 Purchased 1986 issue of Districts 1, 2 & 3 but not in top 25 for 1989 Dean Witter 127.9 13 2,043.2 32 5.6 1 388.6 4 Prudential Bache 504.8 23 939.5 32 171.2 3 171.2 3 Additional Firms Goldman-Sachs 552.7 15 1,566.7 26 38.0 1 413.0 3 First Boston 764.7 10 2,647.2 22 3.8 1 378.8 3 Morgan Stanley 126.3 4 1,788.8 18 34.3 1 389.3 3 Source: Securities Data Co./Bond Buyer ODS:FIN/FPC90 SR6.1 `wi , COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS d ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA May 15, 1990 1a899 EW9 AVENUE ?a.Box 8127 V MWAIN VALLEY.CAUWFNN 9272"127 914I982-2411 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Executive Committee RE: Revisions to Management Vehicle Policy BACKGROUND In February 1973, at the recommendation of a Director's Special Committee on Compensation of Department Heads, the Joint Boards adopted Resolution No. 73-15 Authorizing Leased Vehicles for Management Personnel (attached as white copy). The resolution provides that Districts' management personnel be furnished leased vehicles "equivalent to the type furnished County of Orange Department Heads", pursuant to master lease contracts of the County. Basically, the Boards adopted the County of Orange policy in effect at that time. Because of subsequent changes to the County's policy and other factors described below, it is recommended that the Districts' policy be revised. . The County of Orange policy in effect when the Districts' lease car policy was implemented has undergone considerable change. The County now operates pursuant to Resolution 78-1112 (attached as tan copy) which establishes guidelines for the use of County furnished vehicles. The policy now covers both leased vehicles and the option of a transportation allowance. A separate resolution designates which employees are eligible to receive cars and/or allowances. • The Districts' policy has not been revised to provide the option of a transportation allowance consistent with the County's policy. • The current Districts' policy covers the General Manager and the four Department Heads. Since the policy was adopted there has been significant organizational restructuring including the creation of four Assistant Department Head positions which are properly classified as management. • The Districts have become entirely self-insured for liability coverage. Our insurance consultant, Tillinghast, believes that this presents an extraordinary risk to the Districts during private use of the vehicles, and to an employee who has no other vehicle to insure. Dick Beckendorf, Principal of Coast Insurance Agency, the Districts' broker, has reported that California law assigns liability to the car owne,ilessor (Districts) ; and that the liability limiting statement required for personal use may not relieve the Districts of liability. He has alsosuggested that an employee may not be able to obtain insurance coverage for a vehicle provided by the Districts. Both Tillinghast and Beckendorf recommend the purchase of automobile liability insurance if the practice of leasing vehicles continues. - Executive Committee Re: Management Vehicle Policy May 15, 1990 Page Two �..✓ COUNTY OF ORANGE CURRENT POLICY Lease Vehicle Leases under the County's program are for a three-year term. In order to provide fiscal control and program consistency under the County's policy, the County's monthly contribution for the lease of vehicles is based on certain classifications that have been established. The following is a summary of the relevant County classifications and includes information from our current lease car provider, All-State: Current County of Orange Policy 1990 All-State Classification Vehicle or Equivalent Monthly Lease Category Top Management Buick Lesabre Limited $412 Management Olds Delta 88 Royale Bro. plus tax, Standard Ford Crown Victoria license Chev. Caprice Class. Bro. Pontiac Bonneville LE Other Management Buick Century Limited $375 Management Olds Cutlass Ciera Bro. plus tax, Intermediate Ford Taurus LX license Mercury Sable GS Dodge Dynasty LE Merc. Cougar LS/2 dr. Olds Cutlass Sup. SL/2dr. Buick Regal Ltd./2dr. Ford Thunderbird LX/2dr. In addition to the above lease cost the County pays the operating and maintenance costs including fuel (except for private use outside of the County) repairs and parts replacement. County Transportation Allowance In lieu of a leased vehicle, certain County managers may elect to receive a monthly transportation allowance. Anyone receiving a transportation allowance must furnish and pay for all of his or her transportation needs within the counties of Orange, Santa Barbara, Kern, Los Angeles, Riverside, San Diego, San Bernardino and Ventura. Proof of insurance coverage satisfactory to the County must be provided by the management employee. Other conditions also apply. n The amount of the allowance is reviewed annually by the County' s Director of the General Services Agency and is adjusted for increases in the cost of providing transportation in accordance with procedures that have been established. The allowance is calculated to be an amount equal to the cost of the County to Executive Committee Re: Management Vehicle Policy May 15, 1990 Page Three supply a lease vehicle and its maintenance including fuel , repairs and parts replacement. Based on the approved method, at January 1990 the relevant transportation allowances were calculated as follows: County Monthly Transportation Allowance Top Management $702/month Other Management $702/month Recommendation: Based on the above review and discussion, it is recommended that the Districts' Management Vehicle Policy be revised effective July 1, 1990 to: 1) Discontinue the practice of leasing vehicles for specified management personnel . 2) Implement a monthly transportation allowance for specified management personnel similar to the County of Orange policy as follows: Number Transportation Classification Positions Allowance General Manager 1 $702/month Department Heads 4 $702/month Asst. Dept. Heads 4 $702/month Said monthly allowance to be adjusted annually on or about January 1st to be consistent with the amounts established by the County of Orange Director of General Services Agency pursuant to the County's policy. In lieu of a monthly transportation allowance the General Manager may assign use of a District-owned "E" plate vehicle to an employee. The attached draft resolution (goldenrod copy l would, if approved by the Boards, implement the above-recommended policy chang e *ral ves er M ager -. `../ JWS:sc Encl . - RESOLUTION NO. 73-15 AUTHORIZING LEASED VEHICLES FOR MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL - A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING LEASE OF VEHICLES FOR MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL PURSUANT TO TERMS OF COUNTY OF ORANGE MASTER LEASE t x t x t x x t x t x WHEREAS, the 'Directors' Special Committee on Compensation of Department Heads has recommended that management personnel be furnished with leased vehicles to perform their duties. NOWj THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Districts ' management personnel be furnished leased vehicles equivalent to the type furnished County of Orange Department Heads, pursuant to the terms of master lease contracts entered into by the County of Orange from time to time, which said master leases provide for cooperative purchasing agreements between the County of Orange and other political subdivisions within the County; and, Section 2. That the General Manager be authorized to issue purchase order contracts for lease of said vehicles; and, Section 3• That assignment of said leased vehicles to management personnel shall be made by the General Manager; and, Section 4. That leased vehicles assigned to management employees may be used for private use by the management. employee or the spouse of said management employee, provided, however, that a statement limiting the Districts' liability and responsibility arising out of said private use of leased vehicle is executed by the management employee and the respective spouse; and, Section 5. That during private use of leased vehicles, the gas and oil shall be furnished by the manar_.*ement personnel; and, _ Section 6. That leased vehicl:s,. while being used for private purposes, shall not be driven outside the limits of the State of California unless authorized by the General Manager. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 14, 1973• �•I 311 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF Ji 'ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 51� July 19 1978 Eli On the motion of Supervisor Anthony , duly seconded and carried, i Ithe following Resolution was adopted: 8I BE IT RESOLVED that Resolution No. 75-47, relating to the policy 9 concerning lease or purchase of vehicles and the use of such vehicles, 10I; is rescinded. 11r BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following shall constitute the 12 � policy relating to purchase or lease of vehicles and the use thereof: 13 �I 1. All requests by members of the Board, agencies, and departments ;I 14 and districts governed by this Board of Supervisors for the purchase or 15 i� lease of vehicles or vehicular equipment of any type shall be directed to 161ithe Director, General Services Agency. He shall analyze said request and i ; decide as to whether the particular equipment shall be leased or purchasef 16 it Upon his approval, the requisition shall then be sent to the Purchasing 19 ': Agent for the acquisition of the equipment involved. 20 it 2. The Purchasing Agent is authorized to lease or purchase vehicles 21 and vehicular equipment pursuant to said approved requisitions within 22 ( budgeting limitations approved by this Board. 23 3. The assignment of vehicles, whether leased or purchased, shall 24 Ibe under the control of the Director, General Services Agency. 251 4. Leased vehicles assigned to members of -hp Board and to Agency i 26 land Department Heads may be used for private ust: by the member or 27I \gency or Department Head when such member or Agency or Department Head .28 [ ide1 ,efor esolution No. 78-1112 b Useofcounty urnishedVehicles - escinds Res. 75-47) 1. I is in the vehicle, provided that during such private use the gas and oil 2 shall be furnished by the member or Agency or Department Head. Use 3 within Orange County is deemed not to be private use by a member of the 4 Board. 5 5. Leased vehicles furnished to Agency or Department Heads may be '. 6 used for official use outside the State of California only with prior 7 approval of the Director, General Services Agency. 8I 6. In lieu of the use of a lease vehicle, a member of the Board, i 9A Agency or Department Head may choose to accept a monthly transportation L05N allowance in an amount equal to the cost of the County of supplying such 11 ' a vehicle and its maintenance, including lease or amortized purchase 12 price, fuel, repair, and parts replacement, as determined by the Director i 13 General Services Agency, on the following conditions: 14 A. The member of the Board or Agency or Department Head notifies • 2 - 15h the Director, General Services Agency, in writing, at least six months 16'J prior to the expiration of any current vehicle lease. This provision may 5 3 L7 ) be waived at the option of a member of the Board, who has, at the time of 18I adoption of the Resolution, a leased vehicle. 19 , B. During the period of receiving such transportation allowance, 20 �i the member of the Board or Agency or Department Head shall furnish at his 21 cost all of his transportation needs within the County and within a 22 5 y� in the performance of his duties. 23 C. The member of the Board or Agency or Department Head furnishe 24I such insurance coverage as deemed adequate in the opinion of the 25I Director, General Services Agency, subject to approval of the Board ^F 26 Supervisors, as to type of coverage and amount. 27 D. The member of the Board or Agency or Department Head is 28 prohibited from circumventing the intent and purpose of such an .... -2- r I allowance by authorizing a member of his department to obtain a County 2 vehicle and accompany the member or Agency or Department Head in the 3 performance of his or her duties. 4 E. The member of the Board or Agency or Department Head may 5 terminate this option providing he or she notifies the Director, Generale 6 Services Agency, at least six months prior to the effective date of such i 7i termination. 81 7, No person entitled to a leased vehicle shall be issued or 9 it utilize County gasoline credit cards. 10 ' 11 13 t27 14 16 1! oQo 1 , II 18i AYES: SUPERVISORS PHILIP L. ANTHONY, THOMAS F. RILEY, LAURENCE J. SCHMIT, RALPH A. DIEDRICH AND RALPH B. CLARK 19 NOES: SUPERVISORS NONE 20 ABSENT: SUPERVISORS NONE 21 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. 22 COUNTY OF ORANGE ) 23 I, Jt1vE ALEXAWFR, Clerk of the Board of Sup svisoss:of'orange Count, California, hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution,das duly and regularly adopted by 24 the said Board at a regular meeting thereof held on ttfe .19th day of July 19 78 , and passed by a unanimous cf said Board . 25 IN WIINES5 WHEREOF, I have heremto set my hand -,id seal this 19th day of 26 July 19 78 17 , JUVE ALEXANDER Clerk of the Board of SLipervisors of Orange County, California 3. RESOLUTION NO. - MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL VEHICLE POLICY A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING POLICY RE FURNISHING VEHICLES FOR MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL AND REPEALING PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT HEREWITH z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z WHEREAS, in 1973, pursuant to a recommendation of the Directors' Special Committee on Compensation of Department Heads, the Joint Boards adopted Resolution No. 73-15 establishing a policy of furnishing leased vehicles to specified management personnel to perform their duties; and, WHEREAS, said policy provided that Districts' management personnel be furnished leased vehicles in accordance with the County of Orange policy then in effect for providing vehicles to management personnel ; and, WHEREAS, the County of Orange policy has since been revised; and, WHEREAS, the change of County of Orange policy and other relevant factors make it appropriate .to update and revise the Districts' management vehicle policy. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That in lieu of furnishing specified management personnel leased vehicles for use in the performance of their duties, such employees shall be eligible, at the discretion of the General Manager, to receive a monthly transportation allowance: A. The monthly transportation allowance shall be in an amount equal to the costs determined by the County of Orange for supplying such a vehicle and its maintenance, including lease or authorized purchase price, fuel , repair and parts replacement, as determined by the County's Director of General Services Agency pursuant to County of Orange Resolution No. 78-1112, as amended from time to time. 8. The amount of such monthly transportation allowance for specified Districts' management personnel is hereby established effective July 1, 1990, as follows: Classification Transportation Allowance General Manager $702.00 per month Department Heads $702.00 per month Assistant Department Heads $702.00 per month Said monthly transportation allowance shall be revised annually on January 1, as provided in Section A hereof. C. That acceptance of such monthly transportation allowance shall be subject to the following: 1. During the period of receiving such transportation allowance the management employee shall furnish at his cost all of his transportation needs within the Counties of Orange, Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Kern and Ventura in the performance of his or her duties. 2. The management employee shall furnish such insurance coverage as follows: Bodily Injury $100,000 each person; $300,000 each occurrence Property Damage $50,000 3. The management employee is prohibited from circumventing the intent and purpose of such allowance by obtaining the regular use of a District-owned vehicle in the performance of his or her duties. 4. The management employee may terminate this option providing he or ,. she notifies the General Manager at least six months prior to the effective date of such termination. Section 2. That implementation of the policies set forth herein shall take effect on July 1, 1990, or as soon thereafter as practicable; and, Section 3. That upon implementation of the policies set forth herein, Resolution No. 73-15 and all other resolutions, or portions thereof in conflict herewith, are hereby rescinded and made of no further effect. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY PSj'T T/ON �°�soP°litan OAST — O since 1954 .l NGE COON BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1990-1991 FISCAL YEP.A COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS M ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA 1.� June 27, 1990 10WEW9AVENUE ro WX 8127 MUNTAIN VAUEY.CAUwRNIA 9272"127 01419E24411 TO: Boards of Directors SUBJECT: Transmittal of Individual Districts' Budget Recommendations for 1990-91 W Fiscal Year ,y The proposed 1990-91 budgets for each of the nine Districts are enclosed for your review and consideration. The budget package was reviewed by the Executive Committee on June 27th. The Executive Committee recommended that these proposed budgets be presented to the respective Boards for consideration at the regular July 11th joint meeting. SUMMARY r The proposed 1990-91 budgets total $575 million, up 82% from the 1989-90 budget total of $315.7 million, principally as a result of borrowing budgeted in the amount of $265 million. The following Table I compares the proposed 1990-91 budgets with the 1989-90 budgets to highlight the major areas of changes in the upcoming year: TABLE I COMPARATIVE BUDGET SUMMARY r (MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) INCREASE 1990-91 REQUIREMENTS 1989-90' 1990-91• DECREASE % OF BUDGET JOINT TREATMENT WORKS 0, M 6 R $ 44.5 $ 47.6 $ 3.1 8.3% COLLECTION SYSTEM 8 OTHER DISTRICT 0, M a R 6.9 10.8 3.9 1.9 rr TREATMENT PLANT CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATIONS 102.7 103.4 .7 18.0 DISTRICT SEWER CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATIONS 36.9 37.3 .4 6.5 DEBT SERVICE 6 ISSUE COSTS (G.O. 6 C.O.P.) 12.0 50.8 38.8 8.8 r, SUB-TOTAL 203.0 249.9 16.9 43.5% CONSTRUCTION RESERVES $ 67.8 $224.4 $156.6 39.0% OTHER RESERVES 44.9 100.7 55.8 17.5 SUB-TOTAL 112.7 325.1 212.4 56.5% TOTAL REQUIREMENTS IL15.7 $259.3 100.0 Nr FUNDING CARRY-OVER $ 43.0 $ 71.3 $ 28.3 12.4% APPROPRIATED RESERVES 169.4 101.3 <68.1> 17.8 SUB-TOTAL lum 172.6 <39.8> 30.0% TAX ALLOCATION (1% SHARE) $ 29.7 $32.8 $ 3.1 5.7% TAX LEVY FOR BOND REDEMPTION 0.2 --- < .2> --- CONSTRUCTION GRANTS 2.7 1.0 < 1.7> .2 FEES 49.6 71.4 21.8 12.4 BORROWING --- 265.0 265.0 46.1 ,r INTEREST 6 OTHER 21.1 32.2 11.1 5.5 SUB-TOTAL 103.3 402.4 299.1 70.0% TOTAL FUNDING $259.3 100.0% d • ADJUSTED FOR INTER-DISTRICT TRANSACTIONS 6.' The average source and application of the 1990-91 budgetary dollars are depicted in the following charts: y w r as MWO rrmm �.Y 1..1 a® ®s •" w V do �s 0.Y . ®Q,Y Y®m 0.Y V fY�YY.O YHm r 0675.0 tli111. r The Districts' share of the 1% ad valorem property tax levy, allocated in accordance with Proposition 13, is apportioned to the operating funds of the respective Districts to pay operations, maintenance and replacement/ rehabilitation (0, M 8 R) costs pursuant to the Revenue Program (approved by the Joint Boards in April , 1979) adopted to comply with regulations of the r Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). We have assumed for budgetary purposes that average annual property tax allocations will increase at an average 8% per year, based on the actual increases over the past few years. Districts 13 and 14 receive no ad valorem tax allocations. r r -Z v V When tax revenues have become insufficient to fund the cost of operating, maintaining and rehabilitating the Districts' facilities, alternative funding sources have been adopted to supplement the taxes. The viable alternative methods considered by the individual Districts are: (1) Public hearing and separate levy of separate User Fee charge on the property tax bill (2) Separate user charge collected on water purveyor's utility bill (3) Direct billing by District of a separate user charge (4) Election to authorize separate ad valorem tax levy. Under the Districts' Revenue Program, industrial/large commercial users are currently charged on the basis of actual use and receive credit for ad valorem taxes and User Fees pursuant to the uniform industrial waste ordinance adopted in 1970 and amended in 1975, 1983 and 1989. Institutional/tax-exempt users are also billed separately by the Districts based on actual use where appropriate pursuant to Board policy. The timing of any user charge implementation depends upon the fiscal year in which the ad valorem tax allocation and available reserves become inadequate to cover 0, M 8 R costs. This is reported as Fund Balance on the Operating Fund section of the cash flow projections. Districts 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 11 and 13, have implemented User Fee programs. The following Summary of Operations and Maintenance Financing, Table III , and the cash flows accompanying the individual budgets for Districts 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 11 and 13 incorporate the recently approved fee increase adopted as part of their revised long-range financial program. User fees for all Districts for the remainder of the 10-year planning period have been increased or implemented as needed to fund operations, maintenance and rehabilitation and debt service as a. recommended in the Master Plan Financial Plan adopted in 1989. Our projections indicate that District 7 will need to establish user fees beginning in 1991-92 because the existing ad valorem tax revenues and industrial user fees will be Inadequate to meet their operations and maintenance requirements. District 14 is fully financed by Irvine Ranch Water District charges. The Districts' total funding requirements for the next ten years for construction of new facilities and 0, M 8 R expenses to handle rising sewage flows and to provide improved levels of treatment in response to more stringent d. EPA and SWRCB regulations are summarized in Table II: -3- y I : TABLE II 6w SUMMARY OF PROJECTED EXPENDITURES* 1990/91- 1995/96- 10-YEAR �y 1994/95 1999/2000 TOTAL Treatment Plant Construction $ 528,834,000 $ 152,790,000 $ 691,624,000 27.3% Trunk Sewer Construction 123,571,000 57,077,000 180,648,000 7.1 y Sub-total $ 652,405,000 $ 219,867,000 $ 872,272,000 34.4% 4 Treatment Plant and Sower 0, N 8 R $ 352,615,000 $ 897,583,000 $1,000,228,000 39.4% Debt (Including OOP's and RA's) 296,373,000 368,396,000 664,769,000 26.2 y Sub-total $ 649,018,000 $1,015,979,000 $1,664,997,000 65.6% Total $1.301.423.000 $1.235.B46.000 $2,537,269,000 100.0% y * Adjusted for inter-District transactions rr 6w TABLE III SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE FINANCING- 1990/91 - 1999/2000 (Millions of Dollars) Revenues Expenses r, 1990-91 Total � _-] 1999-2000 Dist. Beginning Available Operation Debt Ending No. Reserves Fees Taxes Other Funding a Mtce. Service Reserves y 1 6.6 136.6 28.8 7.7 179.7 97.0 64.4 18.3 2 9.7 330.7 127.5 19.2 487.1 298.1 145.6 43.4 3 14.5 334.1 161.6 21.4 531.6 311.3 181.0 39.3 y 5 5.1 44.5 36.9 4.0 90.5 52.7 37.5 .3 6 3.4 69.2 20.6 4.1 97.3 54.1 33.0 10.2 7 7.9 58.6 61.8 7.0 135.3 87.9 37.2 10.2 11 9.5 65.1 35.7 5.4 112.7 65.0 36.5 10.2 13 .4 17.8 .6 18.8 16.9 1.9 14 17.3 _2 17.5 17.0 _5 Total 53.1 1,073.9 472.9 69.6 1�669.5 t.000.0 $35.2 134.3 jam, "Not adjusted for inter-District transactions. See individual District's cash flow statements for details. y y V -4- v Capital financing for sewers and treatment and disposal facilities will be provided by accumulated construction reserves and interest earnings thereon, connection and capital replacement fees, sale of capacity rights and issuance of debt. The proceeds from projected future borrowings by most Districts are included in the following Summary of Capital Financing, Table IV. The Districts which will borrow in 1990-91 will pay their proportionate shares of the next year's Joint Works capital expenditures largely from the proceeds of the securities sale as well as accumulated reserves and current revenue. Districts - Nos. 13 and 14 will pay their proportionate shares of 1990-91 Joint Works capital expenditures from existing capital reserves and other capital revenues. The Master Plan Financial Plan recommends borrowing (ie, COPS) to finance future construction in order to stabilize user fees. This approach is reflected in the a, cash flows and in Tables III and IV. For discussion purposes all debt is assumed to be at a fixed interest rate of 8% for 20 years. TABLE IV SUMAARY OF CAPITAL FINANCING' 1990/91 - 1999/2000 m. (Millions of Dollars) Dist. Beginningi AvailabReceipts le Expend 1 0 le Capital Debt Ending No. Reserves Fees Borrowing Other Funding Outlay service Reserves 1 $ 8.1 $ 21.5 $ 70.0 $12.3 $ 111.9 $ 73.2 $ 16.7 $ 22.0 ® 2 34.4 84.4 145.0 42.5 306.3 223.0 34.4 48.9 3 41.2 41.2 220.0 39.2 341.6 259.3 46.2 36.1 5 1.3 4.4 50.0 12.1 67.8 54.7 9.1 4.0 6 3.6 4.3 45.0 7.7 60.6 48.1 8.1 4.4 ® 7 16.7 26.5 50.0 10.8 104.0 85.0 9.5 9.5 11 1.8 12.6 55.0 12.1 81.5 65.6 8.2 7.7 13 9.4 28.7 12.3 50.4 20.5 29.9 14 2.4 50.4 4.0 56.8 56.5 _3 Total 118.9 274.0 635.0 153.0 1 180.9 885.9 132.2 162.8 -Not adjusted for inter-District transactions. See individual District's cash flow statements. ,., The Districts presently treat 272 MGD of which 135 MGD (60 MGD now in service at Plant No. 1 and 75 MGD now in service at Plant No. 2) is secondary treatment. The above projections assume continuation of the Districts' 301(h) NPDES Permit now being considered by the EPA. Should the Directors desire or the EPA and the RWQCB require full secondary treatment, the capital (and 0, M 8 R) costs would increase substantially. The preliminary estimate from the Master Plan Financial Plan is that capital costs for the 10-year period would rise over $150 million. EPA and SWRCB have previously funded up to 875i% of the cost of construction of advanced treatment facilities but congress has eliminated the construction grant program and replaced it with a revolving loan program. Thus, virtually all future treatment plant improvements as shown on CORF Schedule 8-1 (yellow) will be a local responsibility. -5- 1 b,l The real long-term impact of federal and state requirements an District fiscal 6+ planning will be on operating costs. While, as noted, EPA and SWRCB have funded a portion of constructing facilities for a higher degree of treatment in the past, the added ongoing operating costs have always been paid entirely by the local community. The approved Joint Operating budget (green) increased by 6.9 percent for 1990-91. We expect that operating costs will continue to rise due to inflationary influences, rising flows, increased costs of sludge disposal , and other regulatory requirements imposed by such organizations as the r EPA, RWQCB and South Coast Air Quality Management District. The ten-year cash flow projections presented on the following pages for "All Districts" reflect these increasing operating costs on line 10. Under full secondary treatment we estimate that our 0, M 8 R costs would increase $15-20 million annually when all facilities are on line. Staff, as part of the Revenue Program requirements, has reviewed connection fee V schedules to determine the feasibility of this revenue source for financing the escalating cost of providing sewerage facilities to meet long-term wastewater collection, treatment and disposal requirements. All Districts have increased their fee schedules during the past year and all Districts will have the same fee effective July 1, 1990. The Master Plan Financial Plan recommended a change in the connection fee calculation to include future facilities and an annual review of the fee to reflect changes in the cost of construction. District ri No. 14's capital costs are financed by IRWD. User fees are also a potential source of funding capital needs for rehabilitation and replacement, treatment improvements, and debt repayment, as well as 0, M 8 R. The ten-year estimates include anticipated receipt of $42.1 million from SAWPA for sale of an additional 10 MGD capacity rights and payments on its existing 8 MGD capacity in the Joint Works Treatment Facilities. u In the final analysis, the fiscal posture of each District depicted in the enclosed projections will , of course, depend on economic trends and development activity within the service areas of each member agency, and the decisions of legislative and regulatory officials relative to the levels of treatment and environmental controls to be required. u However, regardless of the outcome of the NPDES permit renewal , it is painfully clear that all Districts will have to utilize a combination of increased user and connection fees and employ debt financing to maintain their fiscal integrity and keep pace with the rising costs of sewage treatment and disposal and y increasingly stringent public health and environmental protection requirements. FUND DESCRIPTIONS The budgets have been itemized separately for the operating, capital and general obligation debt retirement elements of each District's budgetary structure to assist Directors in analyzing the projections. Operating Funds y Fifty-seven percent of projected cost increases are attributable to compliance with federal , state and other regulatory agency mandates such as improved treatment, ocean monitoring, air emissions control and sludge disposal . v -6- u r Inflationary trends and new debt service are also reflected. A review of the operating fund cash flaw estimates (top section of the cash flow) allows the Directors of each Board to determine when their respective r District may have to consider alternative user charge funding or adjustments to the existing User Fee program. User fees have been increased or implemented as needed for these cash flow projections (except for District No. 13) in order to maintain prudent reserves and to provide funding for the tax receipt °dry period°. The fees are estimates only, are rounded to - the closest $5.00 and can be found on lines 16 and 17 on the cash flows. No fees will be adjusted without specific Board action. r Capital Funds The capital funds include the capital facilities fund and the construction/ COP repayment fund. The capital facilities fund results from the combining of the accumulated capital outlay fund and the facilities revolving fund. This fund finances each District's share of Joint Works plant expansion costs, as well as the individual Districts' trunk sewer and pump station requirements. Treatment plant projects are listed on CORF Schedule B-1 (yellow) , and collection system projects are listed on separate schedules with each District's budget recommendations. The construction/COP repayment funds serve three purposes. This fund accounts for the construction of those facilities authorized in a COP, for the proceeds of the issue and also for the initial repayment of the principal and interest for the 1986 Issue. By 1993-94 all COP installments - will be made from the Operating funds from user fees and other revenues. Bond Funds Outstanding general obligation bond debt and interest obligations can be met by an annual tax levy which is allowable under Proposition 13. District 7 previously transferred capital and operating reserves which, at -- present value, were to pay the 1962 and 1970 general obligation bonds for the remainder of the life of the bonds. District 3 also transferred a ^ ' portion of its ACO fund reserves to Its bond funds to pay for its 1984-85 and 1985-86 bond retirement and Interest, but it discontinued this practice In 1986-87 as Its financial position weakened. r The financial position of District 3 has not significantly improved and the - - - allowable tax should be levied to fund debt service in 1990-91. District 7 has retired the 1970 issue in August of 1989. Remaining funds in the 1970 r' Bond Fund were transferred to the 1962 Band Fund to accordance with the original intent of the District 7 Board. No tax need be levied for the District 7 bonds repayment for 1990-91, but one may be required for 1991-92. IMPACT OF GANN (PROPOSITION 4) SPENDING LIMITATION INITIATIVE Proposition 4, the statewide initiative which was passed by the voters in 1979, limits appropriations of state and local governments from tax sources to a formula based on changes to population and the cost of living (Consumer Price - Index). If growth In per capita Income is less than the increase in the CPI, then the formula is adjusted to reflect the lower of the two. 7 r • Gv. 6/36/]0 I\ICLL Y]u3 1BBIN, Bl]iX]OYCX]1Bv9 3000 ]qe 1 Ll% I8w�0\ )9_81-eS_ Sv%-_B] IBeDN \vva-vf ' !-iev TeG\ __lui-3000 10-Toe ioN_I Llu OYaYT3M0 IOXO ' t NrvN S Gery-W.e Is Wt Tie ll,lN,N. .......Ow wr♦80rwa 1Nr%SrNa IN.m.ON n,I3X,000 Iw,NI,NO 53.M. 0 1 uY]tlN z ann M n iu 111omtlm 99.IN.00 aE.ela.00 N.117.aw S...".goo ♦♦,He,000 1 1vl.wB.0c0 I16.N8,Po0 ni,v3Law x ] I«s, InOu o- Yw S.BB].000 3.8w.000 3.811.000 5.603.00 B.ON.000 ; 39.316.000 16.43I.wO Iae.30E,ew a ♦ Oue M ie,s%,w0 Sl.t8e.Ow w.i%.ON 18.6N.Po0 e6.333.00 ]IB.000.wO 621.3]].000 NO.aea.000 3 NGee I.IN.NO l. . . . l.lw.ON l.a♦8,000 1,31I.w0 ; 3.N3.Poe w,N♦,000 \1.a]]AN 6 8 IeNa.a 3 X\ewllenm \ems 8.11].000 E..I.,.N Or837AN 6.222,000 B.W.ON I 1f.81i.N0 ♦lr8w,N0 80,660r0N I 1 e fOiu arv4•M ez•n3.0N lal,ael,00D m,txB,No I33,e73,00 Iw.3aa,oN • !w,]N.we I,Oss,Ile,aN Lwa,aeO.oN e e fuu LrNWu Nn1Po Iss,3u,ON u6,402.00 ----- --- ---- 00 250.953.000 I uu♦w.ON Llusu.NO l.Nv,ns.oN v aanx caN18 t l0 abn.1 1..Yens x L 0 4I.441A00 w."a.. si.w8•NO 85.791.. npH•NO 1 M.S... Nv,m,aN w0,1H.ON IO u HuecNm entm x a 0 m0 oMe 0me. 10.181.000 8.804.000 9.318.000 u.M.NO I1.en.0N I n.n].ON n,On,NO wvm.ON IS ti Nn Nnlm Wsoa.PoO ".,"..a e3190.040 %.nl.ePo I 154.194.440 33I.0831. eN.nB.ON n O Otbe ay.eeltmu. I 0 0 13 Ia ffiLL @OR1. 18,300 N 3O...'aN 106.NT.NO IaS,nLON lw.ali,an I eae,wl,aN eN.M.. 1.133.07.00 w le N«eru a Nen-0rN b Mt Tm II.IH.NO ..♦ &AGO IPo.n3.000 100.333.00 IN.NI.ON 1 M.M.N. IM.29,ON Iw.Ie3.ON IS IS Mt i«r's 0ey MlM a,WIN NOu\ereG 38dB♦.000 H.M.Ow SLNO.ON SS.HO.ON HAw.ON 1 NAO--- I-----O II9.nOrNO IB 11 Ntl N1-00 u IN11.M 43dw.000 a♦.011.000 aB.]N.000 NAN.PoO N.3]i.ON i Nd%.ON 16.810.ON Se.3Ie.Na ll ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... I ............. ............. r.......... caarm Nw1H 1 Ie N.aw.a 6vyar.v aq Wt iNe uB.eNEHO !2.N1.00 !!0_ii!22 1wauENO ne.E♦B.Na ufiEeu.NO w0.N3.Poe IIB.S!0_M IS aiYaNe u iota I.NO.NO 1 a.2.1 ON I.Ne.aN u 10 1a«t Cm,sctlm u.%O.ON 1♦.NS.ew ...,all. IesN.oN 11.u1.000 I IB•a81.N0 100.0]S.NO neaaa,ON N at lv0,num MIe 3a33.0N znw,NO i.isa.00e a.an.ON a.n♦.ON I w.Msl Po Soala.ON H.m.ON n n 0«e I« i 0 a zNi NG 4e 1v s a•%S,Na a i H.a T.M.0, iaN uw, N ] \,In,O n,N H.ta1.N0oWwY alp" 19 ,Ne,N 1, N, NN .ON ON i N is InGnN a Xlvllepgm Iv vv 1......ON If,eN.000 1......... u....... B,N3,ON N.M.N. 44.433.004 IN.312.0N x6 N een YaauW N3•N0.0% n3rONrNO N.000r04 ew.ON.ON IN.NO.ON W.M."a N 31 O0B.. Ins. .."a'. I.EN.ON 1.... 1.M.Na zl N MLL enax% vN.iOi.ON SO.t!].ON 279.910.. 31.1".. 94.3O0.ON 1 To .0331. a%.HI.ON 1.Ov3.♦Sa.NO N 30 A1LL 1Y11WU N1m1N BH.N1,000 S_%.N1,ON a_9_0_.N]_.N0 _3N,♦%,000 1N,0__n,NO t nSaN3.N0 _8%.NB.ON 1.\eS,Na.NO N nOami 30 9Gve IN loyt NeG lest.ept Y1ut 183.422.000 ISS.10♦.000 IS♦.N3.000 01.109,000 NJ..NO NB.BN... 107.071.00 NWaollON N 31 OGtelet Cell.etl®eYst« ]T•iw,NO ]]r]Nfaw SLON•ON u,N8.N0 19,]b.NO 1 IS],%t.ON u.%irNO IBO,NI'm fl u N1�t-aN6 lieu 1a,vw,Ne IO,aw,NO v,eu,cN IN,NO i 7.,NS,NO w,N3.ON % N Net Lwn wG!v....... ae,wO,oPo SssOo,aN ♦.aPo,PoO 1 lasOo,Poo u,xeO,No u,rto.aoa n ' N blvbes«Nt y.wmt PNweG tae•N. i IN.ON Ia1.000 N De O.Me bs..eltw. a.%1.000 \.H1,000 I,Ow,Ow l.Tn.Ne S.i_%.N_0 i 1_O,3N,N0 8,616,00a _ IL_%e.PoO as N Na" NaNOaMN 10Sr1100Po ln_OO,nO 10]�N.NO t%_9IL0_w Po:n_,0N _Na♦n AN- in_-eNuNe 1_N_ni oN 33 % Ns.rv.s 9 New-oru b xut iue Hfsw.ew LO.NbNO Ne.TI1.000 IN.aN.000 \OO.Nf.PoO \OO,SBa.NO IN.%1,000 I..AmaN % ............ ............ ............ ............ ....... = I ............. ............. ............. C [ _ C _ [ _ C _ C " t C [ _ [ _ C _ [ _ u _ C _ [ [ _ L .- C mexrl Wlvnax Olmm . ui anl/60 ' or dolma aue rinv W. 1 r1eCY.riW! 1N0-el }e3pCGC lap-IOX LlX IT:!! lXl-X lMi-N 1pN-N lBN-N i !-lw[—1 !OX-a0N a•-Tue N[N {lN 0010 Nall1 1 N 4x[.a \6eyMa rrx YBt lxe B16.N• ea.NO ' N.ON ----a ---- 1 •ln.X• prOX Id.XO X WIW t a to YrY N.00o l000m Ia,XO 13.ON 1... 23... N,OX Ne,OX X {0 \almlluuu. I— •rwo a,Na a,NO I,ON 4m i to.N0 I.m 14.00 •o LL 0[We tees. • 0 II .... - 1 _•___ AN _.. _.. O Il.m I iMu IOYv[ u.NOI". i MAN N.•X ]N,No Ia N 1XLL\nlL1BY rOaaN NS.000 W.000 N.oN ae.N• aI.NO 1 esn.•o0 N.m 3.0,m a WmIMr6 f N Yve remlpl 3 Iebma 31d,N0 NI,NO WON ...No I•,oN 1 aos,No 61.00 3N,N0 N +B otYe YpuNwYe MAO. ! aN,ON Nt,000 Ie -- _—__�.... ______•___ _—_______ _______— __._____ I ----------- I• WLL .IIOYd OOIrOX III.000 I•.000 N.0.0 a•.m i NO.N] !!.•N - W.ON I• {l 3.ur.B 3 4m-A.e iB MM irr 61.440 Wm IO.ON a.NO Cm I I.. 0 I531.N0! N N Yu[ !ue'.W Mb0 lWly ry. tm BLOOD N.ON ln.N• 12.00 31N0 1 9.040 0 16N.ON1 \\ {0 4ot YWw m IYfbN! 0 0 1 0 • ............• ............0 ............ ............0 ............ 1 ..........0 C!. ............. ........... evNur IYY.ay ex Iew.-iva lrvuty.l 10 tw. \Y.q-b.e a—b6 aw 172.1.0.000 dan,NI.ON AMU.... m.NOrON aae,plC,NO lil,la,•Op X1,01d,N0 13IrXd,NO n0 6I MLL WWYI Io\.1pe.m Ist.N1... ....ca I.•.. 1i0.]N.ON n..X3.N0 1 I,NO.3el.0a I.NI.Ne.N• ].N0.116.000 6a .. r _... _._..... ._ nl MLL.1. 101011N 519.10e.ON I16.33B.00 .0,....... IN.NdpN NIAHAN 1 I.5I3.I11.No 1.340.3I1.ON S.Na.i•O.NO nl s1 NSLL WOD1f0lY W.III.000 ]11r11].ON ipe.133.•N NO.III.ON MIMS.. I 1.]Ia.1N.N0 � I.SeI.CX.NO 3.1N.6.O.NO sl 11 Y..rn. \YegMa b S!!sB .•. 1IWx101lm e rwYx.Y.tXOmCxI x NrNnx[MeI.d I YmllC w11}1pI I mW Sl e.[.e 0btela Y. II uilaMWlr.•IfHNlw.,ON NO 1INNr,1N131r,0N000 1NNI,.NOCeI,.NNOO NIOSI,.INIeIr,•ONN ill0•1,.0IOIaB.,ONNO I 3!lo•l..00pN6..0NNO WI1l.,]nPoIO..NONO M1TOpZ.Op32OZ ----- --------- --- ------ ------ I-. 1- .1 .r .ON eN0{n•Ybas X. N x.e nx V Staff has estimated the Districts' appropriation limits which will be presented as 6W a separate Agenda item and submitted to the Boards at the July 11, 1990 meeting of the Joint Boards. Our preliminary calculations indicate that each District is within its authorized limit as indicated in Table V: TABLE V 1 90- 1 TAX APPROPRIATION BUDGET COMPARISON WITH GANN LIMITATION3 1.. 1990-91 District Net 1990-91 District Tax Appropriations Budget Gann Limitation u 1 $ -a- $ 2,273,000 2 906,000 8,539,000 v 3 2,775,000 11,384,000 u 5 1,195,000 2,174,000 6 29,000 1,362,000 1 ' r 7 1,940,000 3,317,000 11 812,000 2,339,000 13 No tax appropriation budget Not applicable (District is 100% financed by fees) V 14 No tax appropriation budget Not applicable (District is 100% financed by fees) u SPECIFIC BUDGET ITEMS Following is a brief discussion of the major elements of the budgets: � CARRY-OVER AND RESERVES: The appropriated reserves and carry-over consist I primarily of accumulated construction reserves for financing new facilities to serve our service area needs and improved treatment facilities mandated by federal law and the master-planned trunk sewer systems of the individual Districts. Also included are operating fund contingency reserves and authorized general reserves for the tax revenue cash flow dry period. r+' REVENUE Taxes: Tax revenue is split into two accounts: y Tax Allocation - This account represents the anticipated allocation of theDistricts' pro rate share of the maximum 1% basic property r' tax allowed under Proposition 13. The Districts average approxi- mately 3% ($.03 for each $1.00) of the basic levy. Districts 13 i and 14 receive no tax allocation. -8- u u Tax Levy - This account represents tax funds necessary to make voter-approved outstanding general obligation bond principal and Interest payments. Under Jarvis-Gann, tax levies to satisfy these obligations are not restricted. Federal/State Construction Grants: In the past, EPA and SWRCB have funded up to 87 of treatment plant construction for certain approved projects. Estimates reflect anticipated payments based on grant funding of those previously approved and completed projects which are currently completing the EPA audit appeal process. Fees: All Districts have an adopted sewer connection fee schedule. This category also reflects industrial waste user charges levied by all nine Districts pursuant to the Uniform Industrial Waste Ordinance and the Revenue Program, and the user fees implemented in Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 11 and 13. Annexation fee revenue is indeterminable and, thus, not generally included in the estimates unless there is an existing agreement providing for payment of fees. Sale of Capacity Rights: This account records income from sale of capacity rights to outside agencies such as SAWPA, including the capital replacement charge. SAWPA is considering purchase of an additional 5 MGD in 1990-91 and 5 MGD in 1995-96 under their existing agreement, and these revenues are included in the 10-year estimates. Interest 8 Miscellaneous Income: Consists primarily of interest income from investment of accumulated construction reserves and other miscellaneous items. Other Revenue: On the cash flow statements this account generally reflects inter-fund transfers. In District 5 it includes $4,450,000 in the capital facilities fund over the next three years estimated to be received from ® IRWD for construction of facilities to serve the Down Coast Area. EXPENDITURES: Other than reserve appropriations there are six major expenditure components of the individual Districts' budgets, four of which have either " previously been acted upon or reviewed by the Boards, or established by contractual obligations or outstanding general obligation bond indentures. Joint Works Treatment Plant Construction Program: Adoption of the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget CORF, yellow by the Joint Boards at their regular June meeting established the requirements for this item, which accounts for 18% of the 1990-91 budget. Included in the Capital Facilities Fund budgets are appropriations for the current year CORF budget and toward master-planned treatment plant expansion costs that will total $691.6 million over the next ten years. Each District' s share is based on its respective equity percentage, which is computed on a three-year average of sewage flow from each District. This account includes only budgeted new construction and excludes any r' annual purchase of additional joint works equity that might be required due to a change in a District's proportional equity percentage. Districts Nos. 6, 7 8 13 are required to purchase additional equity in 1990-91. Unless otherwise noted, any. such purchases or sales have been adjusted out of the combined summaries and schedules. -9- V II District Collection S stem Consolidated Master Plan Construction Programs: Requ rements for this item are essentially established by the individual District's adopted Master Plans of trunk sewers, but may be changed from time to time at the option of the Boards. Sewer construction will total $180.6 million during the next ten years. I Debt Retirement and Interest: These requirements are fixed by the indentures of the respective general obligation bond issues. (See convents above under Tax Levy re 1990-91 funding.) COP debt repayment in Districts 1, 2 and 3 is included in their respective construction funds. II u Joint 0 eratin Ex enses: Requirements for this item were also established In June by adoption o he Joint Operating Budget (green). Individual it District's shares of this cost are based an their proportionate gallonage u flow for the 1990-91 fiscal year. Reimbursement A ment Payment: This account represents anticipated � paymen s base onree connection tees collected) against outstanding u reimbursement agreements where a developer has constructed a master plan sewer or advanced connection fees for such construction. District 5 currently has one such agreement for the oversizing of the Bayside Drive y Sewer. District Maintenance 0 eratin 8 Other Ex enditures: This item establishes requ raven s for ma n enance an operat on of the inalviauai District's u sewer collection systems and also provides for each District's general business activity. It also includes any other miscellaneous costs or i I transfers not included in one of the above items. yi FUNDS Following are comments regarding the several funds of each District's recommended 6W budget. OPERATING FUNDS: The major item in the Operating Fund is the share of the Joint perating Bu get (green) which was adopted by the Boards in June. The remaining budget accounts are primarily for maintenance and/or repair of the Districts' collection system and for the incidental operating expenses which the Districts will incur. All of the Districts have been in the midst of major trunk sewer expansion and rehabilitation programs for the past several years. As a result, budgetary requirements for sewer line and pump station maintenance reflect Increases for maintenance of these facilities, increasing energy costs and W extraordinary repairs to manholes and sewers. Industrial monitoring costs which reflect the expense of enforcing the uniform use ordinance and EPA's pretreatment standards which became effective on April 27, 1984, are continuing to rise. Following are further comments on the Operating Fund line item accounts: I Directors' Fees: Provides for regular meetings and allows for compensation r,d n acc�ad nce with the fee schedule adopted by the respective Boards. Share of Joint 0 eratin Represents each District's share of operating, maintain ng, an adm nistering joint works trcatment and disposal facilities, and is allocated based on gallonage flow of each District. Amounts were established by adoption of the Joint Operating Budget in June. � . u -10- I Trunk Maintenance: Provides for maintenance of each District's collection system of trunk sewers. The several Districts presently have approximately 850 miles of trunk and sub-trunk sewers ranging in size up to 96 inches, as well as several hundred miles of small local sewers in District No. 7 a, serving two cities and various unincorporated areas. Manhole INN Repairs: Provides for major contractual repairs to the Districts' manhes and trunk sewers or pump station wet wells which have deteriorated because of corrosion. Pum Station Maintenance: Provides for maintenance of District's pump and lif stations. Districts which have collection systems that cannot flow to the treatment sites by gravity (particularly coastal Districts 5, 6 and 11 as well as District 7) have one or more stations. Therefore, the costs among the Districts vary considerably based upon the number of pumping facilities. Permit and Industrial Waste Administration: Provides for the Industrial Waste Division's administration and enforcement of the Uniform Connection and Use Ordinance. Requirements mandated by State and Federal regulatory agencies have caused this item to increase substantially over the past few years. Inter-District Sewer Use Charge: Provides for payment for inter-district flows between certain Districts pursuant to basic accommodation agreements between those Districts. Bond Collection Expense: Several of the Districts' bond issues provide for coupon redemption by the Bank of America which charges the Districts for said services (with the exception of District No. 11). .� Tax/Fee Collection Ex ense: The County charges a tax and supplemental user fee collec ion expense an all funds except bond interest and sinking funds. Treasurer's Investment Administration and Banking Fee: Fees charged the Districts by the Orange County Treasurer for placing specific investments of Districts' funds and handling commingled investments. Utilities: Major item in this account is for power supplied to the Districts' pump stations. Also includes telemetering on leased lines to the control center at Plant No. 1, and water supply where needed at the pumping station sites. Appropriations are increasing to reflect rising energy and water rates. User Fee Expense: Fees charged by the Orange County Assessor for data base use and by the County Data Center to process supplemental user fee _. programs. m Professional Services: Appropriates funds for minor engineering, legal and special consulting work for which the need arises from time to time in the Districts. A significant rate increase is proposed for next year by the Assessor's Office. -11- I ' 1 � Printing and Publication: This account provides necessary funds for Ir publishing actions and regulations of the Boards as well as the Districts' annual user fee report to the EPA and SWRCB. I � Meeting and Travel - Dlrectors' Mileage: Provides for reimbursement to v Directors for transportation to board meetings and other functions. II Uncollectible Accounts: For bad debts related to the collection of `+ Industrial user charges. Interest Expense: For interest on purchase of joint works equity or on W outstanding reimbursement agreements, where applicable. Prior Year's Ex ense: Represents adjustments to an account balance for the V previous year s . Transfers: Usually reflects inter-fund transfers to complete previous ; ! accounting transactions or to provide necessary supplemental funding. Similar reciprocal transactions may appear in other funds. BOND FUNDS: Budget. requirements for the Bond Funds are determined by the indenture of each issue and are established each year in accordance with legal requirements. (See comments above under Tax Levy and Debt Retirement and Interest re 1990-91 funding.) CAPITAL FACILITIES FUND: Generally, the major item in the Capital Facilities Fund is the individual District's respective share of the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget (yellow) for joint treatment works expansion, which was adopted by the Boards at the June meeting. In addition, the Districts also have a Master Plan sewer construction program in progress for which specific budget I , appropriations have been recommended for contracts presently under way or W planned in the near future. Other line items in this fund are primarily for accumulated reserves for future construction in accordance with the Districts' sewer and joint works master plans and federal and state requirements, and purchase and sale of equity in jointly-owned treatment works as provided for in �r the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement. CONSTRUCTION FUNDS: Districts 1, 2 and 3 issued Certificates of Participation � COP's in August, 1986 to pay for their respective shares of the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF) for joint treatment works facilities for a three-year period (through 1988-89). Revenues have been transferred into these funds from the three Districts' Capital Facilities funds to make the installment payments as the COP proceeds and interest earned on the proceeds are used for certain CORF construction. Remaining COP proceeds will be used to retire outstanding I ' COP's. New construction funds are proposed for borrowing in 1990-91. These rr funds will account for the proceeds of borrowing and will transfer to the . capital facilities funds for approved projects as required. If Directors have any questions regarding the budget material , please contact we Wayne Sylvester or Gary Streed. I ' v u -1p- 1 u COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY .L yP. ,O A n 0ek U y = I o N K O�gNGE COO BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1990-1991 FISCAL YEAR COOIITT SAAITASIOM DISTRICT NO. 1 6/20/90 BODGBT RBOOM�TIOBS P6 1 1990-91 FISCAL YEAP _ DISTRICT 11 50MIfART APPROO® APP00V® p[CLOOOIpBD DEECRIPTIOA OR ACCOOAT TITLE BODG6T BODGES BODGBT 19BB-89 1989-90 1990-91 REOOIRB1B11T9 _. OmTAtin0 6 Cwital RWYS[4rf1TJ: Opratin9 Pond 7,728,000 9,128,000 13,742,000 COrutructi0n Fvtls 12,168,000 7,02,000 19,026,000 r capital Fldllti64 FteM 10,9851000 4 11,424,000 + 1],261,000 SOB-TOTAL OP6]U G 6 CAPITAL 00,BB1,000 27,629,000 50,029,000 D%Ot P.atir9 BO Yfi InUrest PurN - 1951 144,000 71,000 2O[AL RBDOIe@6BT8 L31,025,000 27,100,000 50,029,000 CODNTY SANITATION DISMCT NO. 1 6/20/90 BODGBT PSNlOBNDASIONS Page 2 m 1990-91 FISCAL V&1A DISTRICT 11 SVMD MP�VBD AYPPDYBD NBCaN m ,y D88CAI lw ON ACCODNT TITLE B0008T BODOBT BDDGBT 1988-89 1989-90 199D-91 - I PONDINO: DpmrAtifMl A Capital Tipsifw� Caen A Imeetarnta (Appropriated sassrves and Csrry-0ver) 23,648,000 17,204,000 14,716,000 Ot1IDr NaypnaneM 5,679,000 * 8.501,000 m 33,250,000 x `n Anticlpatad Sax Allocation From 1% La" 1,754,000 1,92 a,000 3,063,000 .may SOB-TOTAL OP2NATINO A CAPITAL 30,B81,000 27,629,000 50,029,000 Dort 9atirmamnt Caao A Immmtmente (,Appropriated m Amssrvee A Csrry- r) 83,000 52,000 Otnar Aay. 7,000 0 m Amo.t 9aissd EY T... for Debt Obligation 54,000 19,000 ee SOB-TOTAL DEBT 95TIPIDffiIR 144,000 71,000 0 MrM PONDING 31,025,000 27,700,000 50,029,000 m Adjusted for Inter-p Transfers The CgmCY is PrwwntlY Smpos9dLq taxB6 -- in cos ion piM a dispute over a68eaemd valuation. Taxes ispastlad as _ of 3 30M amount to 038,223. by 1 COUNTY SANITATION DIVMcr NO. 1 Page 1 4 AN BODONT R8C010®DATIONs 6/20/90 iw 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR POND Al OPERATING V ESTIMATED APPp0980 APPPOM ACTUAL AEODg®IDED .I DRSCAIMON OR ACCOUIR TITLE BODOR BODGBT BDBmrrwm Boom bd 198s-s9 1989-90 1989-90 1990-91 II OPERATING V Directors' Pass 8,000 12,000 0,700 10,000 N Contractual services Share of Joint Operating 4,223,000 4,092,000 3,822,900 4,854,D00 V TrWd, Maintwnee 30,800 31,000 6,100 31,000 M whole Lint And Nat gall Repaire 17,500 17,ON 17,000 Parait and Ind.Nasty Alain. in,000 200,000 269,900 289,000 V Connection Pee Alin. 25,000 78,000 18,600 s0,000 Bond Collection Expense 200 200 100 Tax/ Pea Collection Exp 10,500 12,000 11,900 15,000 Treuurer'9 InYaetaent Ads. V A Beni" Peas 10,000 15,000 8,800 15,000 0ecr Poe Bapenaa 15,000 72,000 I7,700 76,000 V Professional Services 10,000 5,800 13,100 15,000 I ' Printing And publication 1,500 1.500 1,300 1,500 Traval A Meeting - Directors Soo 500 200 500 4.+ mieouaetiDle Accounts 1,000 1,000 eo0 1,000 TOTAL OPERATING 4,543,000 4,538,000 4,100,100 5,405,000 to NON-0PBRAT KG Interest 1w Eryenaas Applicabla to Prior Yeare 3,000 3,000 1,400 2,000 I i W TOTAL �-0emarlNa 3,000 3,000 1,400 2,000 TOTAL OPERATING A NOW-OPERATING 4,546,000 4,541,000 4,181,S00 5,407,000 r REBEEM I ' Appeopriaticr for Contingencies 909,000 2,311,000 5,631,000 v Authorized General IlBeerve 2,273,000 2,271,000 2,704,000 TOTAL A68TR9Bs 3,182,000 4,562,000 ol 5,335,000 V TOTAL REOUIREMENTB 1 7,728,000 9,123,000 4,191,500 13,742,000 I V ve CLONSY WISATION DIEM= M. I P.9 2 -- 90IXieS APCO}9®OASION6 6120/90 c 1990-91 Fle YEAR POND 41 OP6I mo c PPS➢ m APPRCWD APPRaP® A=m 9ACC)OtA w DPBCDIPSION 09 Accou" 912A6 PODOW BODGBS �IRIAPB BODG82 1988-89 1989-90 1909-90 1990-91 AVAIIAOU PONDINO u CaaA A Inwetemfs (Appropriated PuuvM eM Carryb ar) 3,657,000 3,213,000 3,866,500 6,630,000 rw 385,000 506,000 389,700 410,000 8upplaontal Over Pees 1,635,000 3,202,000 3,291,200 4,309,000 IMenat A Nine. pa[Aipta 242,000 236,000 475,900 530,000 m Delinquent Saxes 55,000 81,000 114,600 112,000 6p5-S m 2,311,000 4,061,000 4,211,400 5,161,000 Su Alloeetion 1,474,000 1,502,000 1,483,100 1,620,000 m 9ed Iopeent Age Pees-thrmnh 241,000 309,000 293,000 299.000 8ubvmtiam 39,D00 32,000 34,600 32,000 e 808-SOSAA 1,734.000 1,843,000 1,811,300 1,951.000 TW1 AVAIDAPLS PONDI310 1,128,000 9,123,000 9,949,200 13,142,000 w COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 6/20/90 6r BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR V POND 81 CAPITAL FACILITIES V ESTIMATED APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL RECOMMENDED ' DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET EXPENDITURES BUDGET 1908-89 1989-90 1989-90 1990-91 V PROJECTS RED MUMMITORES 6, Treatment Plant Facilities 5,983,000 3,754,000 10,321,000 Appropriation for Master-Planned Treatment Plant Facilities 7,035,000 3,220,000 5,661,000 Master Plan/EIR Update - 55,000 V Earthg0ake/Flood Damage Reserve 415,000 921,000 499,000 1 ' Appropriation for District Facilities y Improvements and Expansion 2,6a0,000 1,700,000 11,000 760,000 SUB-TOTAL 10,985,0001 11,424,000 3,765,000 17,261,000 V Transfer to Construction Fend 723,000 1,412,000 COP Payment Transfer to Corot. Fund 2,309,000 2,341,000 W TOTAL REVIRS RNTS 14,017,000 15,177,000 3,765,000 17,261,000 k✓ AVAILABLE FUNGIXO teen a Investments (Appropriated Reserves and Carry-war) 11,139,000 10,916,000 10,623,600 4,213,000 II Transfer free COP Issues 10,321,000 Ixd Construction Grants 285,000 287,000 216,000 100,000 / V Connection Pees 500,000 1,561r000 372,000 456,000 Industrial Waste Fees 109,000 143,000 109,000 126,000 1 Supplemental Pees 559,000 Sala of Capacity Rights 492,000 489,000 69,000 1,061,000 '4F4 Joint Works Equity Sala 129,000 1,]50,000 1,373,000 511,000 Interest and Nisc. Receipts 809,000 431,000 037,000 47],000 y BOB-TOTAL 2,878,000 4,261,000 2,976,000 SJ,Od8,000 1 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 14,017,000 15,177,000 13,599,600 17,361,000 OOMW SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 6/19/90 _. BUDGET REC0MMEND01TIONS m 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR FUND 91 CONSTRUCTION/1966 m ESTIMATED .. APPROVED APFROVRD ACTUAL RECOHNINDED DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BOUGHT BUDGET EXPENDITURE SOUGHT d 1968-89 1989-00 1989-90 1990-91 PRD.IECTB AND EEPSNOIxm m Treatment Plant Expansion 9,859,000 4,741,000 2,719,000 ae Reserva for Puture Installments 1,712,000 m OUR-TOTAL 9,859,000 4,741,000 2,719,000 1,712,000 COP Installment PaYNents 2,309,000 2,341,000 2,341,500 2,322,000 r TOTAL RBODIRENENTS 12,164,000 7,092,000 5,060,500 4,034,000 AVAILABLE FORTINO Cash end I.,Ceente (Appropriated Reserves and m Carry-ovar) 8,952,000 1 3,079,000 1 3,299,500 3,873,000 m 1990 Sorrouing Interest A Use. Receipts 284,000 254,000 392,600 161,000 m Transfer from C. F. Fund 723,000 1,412,O00 1,412,000 SUB-TOTAL 1,007,000 1,666,000 1,604,600 161,000 TRANSFER MR INBTALLNENT PAYMENTS M COP Payment Transfer leap Capital Pond 2,309,000 2,341,000 2,341,000 TOTAL AVAILABLE FONDING 12,160,000 7,082,000 7,449,100 4,034,000 m r w m r✓ I ! COi1NTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 6/19/90 u BODGBT RECONNENDATTOBB 1990-91 PIBCId, YBAA `1 POND 31 CONSTROCTION /1990 ' I EBTINATED V APPROV® APPROVED ACTOAL RECLTDODID® DESCRIPTION OR ACCOONT TITLE BODGB'1' BODGES E2FENDITURE9 BODGES 1986-09 1989-90 1989-90 1990-91 V Macro AND 82PENDITDREB I 1 1Yanefer to Capital Facilities Pund 10,323,000 Debt Issuance Cost 3,750,000 L Reserve for Nester Plan Projects 11,242,000 L TOTAL RBQVIR0 S 0 0 0 25,313,000 AVAILABLE FONDINO Cash end Investment. (Appropriated Reserves and bw Carry-aver) Proceeds from Borrowing 26,000,000 Interest A Mies. Receipts 313,000 L TOTAL AVAILABLE FORDING 0 0 0 25,313,000 I I 1r bd II V I ' i.o II L � 1 u ee GONrY SANITATION DISTRICT N0.1 8/28/90 _. BUDGET RECONENDNTIOO y� 1980-91 FISCAL YEAR et BOND AND INTEREST - 1951 ae ESTIMATED APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL RFCONEWED -. DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BU00ET EXPENDITURES BUDGET 1988-99 1989-M 1949-" 1980-91 SOD RETIRONUff AND INTEREST m --Principal on Boede ------ 70,000 70,OOD 70,000 - InTer"t m BB 2,025 875 146 Trporer to Capital F"iliti" 20,254 -' TOTAL 72.825 70.875 90,4m 0 d AUTHORISED GENERAL RESERVE 71,375 TOTAL REOUIRINENTS 144.000 70.875 0 AVAILABLE FUNDING ----------------- -- Cam 6 Imeebenta (Appropriated Re"1Y" aW " Carry- r) 93.0m 52.000 73,BGO DalilAAu Tax" I'M 11000 3.8M _- Inbr"t A Him. Amelpte S.00D m SUB-TOTAL T,000 1,000 3.800 O -- ANOINT TO BE RAISES BY TAXES 54,000 17,075 12,]00 TOTAL AVAILABLE FNIDIIIG 144.000 70,875 90.100 0 td CWMV SlXlinilON Ox9iB IC2 XO.I p/l9/BO 8LH®U13 OP 0[5}plCi COLL9CClOX 9Y6i 311 P6O30C}n fall.. [Oral. C.I.P. 1990-91 1903-02 1992-93 1099-W 199C-95 9-Yea[ Total 1995-2000 10-Yea[ Total Oyer ..a Xuln to BaMLl ll to tlm (3) 310,000 170,000 170.000 170.000 rein-Oy0[ mMo1e BeluLl ll to lien (3) 110,000 I10.000 170,000 170.000 Creenvllle-no311 ran Sole fieMb. (3) 190,000 0 100.000 150.000 Saltr Street .a le peMX,Ltat1M (I) 220,000 0 2$0,000 xz0,000 Slot— Mc...t me lion Santa Ma Hive[ (3) Santa .1O1er Seed leant. I-IS 2,101,000 11,000 400.000 1,150,000 21150,000 $,I50,000 Sun Pl...r Inte[ceptee, f-S-I-1 . 330.000 260.000 )0,000 330,000 330,000 Xlnealleneeue 1,000.000 .00,000 100.000 I00,000 100.000 100.000 500.000 S00,000 1,000,000 Toinl. t,231.000 11.000 MISS. 1.920,00. 100,000 270.000 210.000 3.320.000 9e0.000 4.220,000 ........... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ........... ........... ............ Pa[tlally IUMed by 0l et rid Xod 1. IYeta[•01appN LaCtlltlae OraSMtly under tonal rvct ion 2. NM rarro2anna0 tacultlee p[eeently under deaiV 3. Xav e.r-p1YN.e 4initlea .cteduleal for future dea49n/conetructlon . BWnAIIW OxemW x0. a 6I20I10 eSAS]WOS W ND]HC]®CABX Blgy yeW i .. YCA9e 1990-1991 yNNNO1 1999-3000 LINt 1n0-91 1991-92 1991-% 199]-N 199e-]6 5-1. 1. ills-]0% it .SOWI LIB[ WBUSIXO IONO 1 9Y0[We 6 DerrYO+er [[W Lee[ Yee[ 6.630.000 8.]]!.%0 0.096.W0 6.03.040 1.912.00 6.6]O.OW 9.110.000 6.6NrOW 1 P6t�pN5 3 BN[e .1 it T.AlieNtleo 1.061.000 3.310,000 3.]6e.0% 3.119.000 3•Yl]•OW U.9%.000 36.930.OW W.eU.WO ] ] .11,111"NNN ....No e72.000 ]6].000 636.W0 1L.0W 3.161.N0 l.111.00 0.3b.0% ] 6 0ee[ ON. 6.109.N0 1.0l.NO 1.610.W0 9.906.0. 13.I16.01M) e0.116.W0 00.091.0% 1L.1]1.N0 9 5 reteteet 6 XleolleNwe 1•me 5]0.000 W.000 %1.000 IU.00o 6WWO 2.85e.000 e.061.000 1.119.%0 5 6 WMe 9mwe 6 1 1fRAL P6VC106 l.11].NO 0.919.000 11.W].000 13.112.0% 16Amem, 57.670.00 US•6M.0W 173.130.0W 1 0 1%14 AVA[L6018 9010IB0 1].163.000 31.311.000 ]9.t06.0% 211.1.W0 36.1O1.00 N.]%.0% I26.6W.OW 119.14N.000 0 W9WDUNRW I 9 ters o! JNM Nor.t X 9 0 e.U6.000 5.]19.000 1.006.000 6.611.OW 1.61O.W0 30•110.000 59.69 .WO N.0I1.000 9 10 U1vtt1N 9yet—M 6 O W ONe[ Opr. 003•000 W1.000 610.000 661.040 613•0N I 3.010.000 ].905.W0 6.961.000 10 11 M12 Berv1W-NN ]1]00,000 3.150.000 5.00,.000 O.N."Ney 16.250,000 .3100.000 60.310.000 11 Il ueot Ne, --1996 300100 L.000.OW 1.10.0W 2.236.000 5.336,000 30.166•WO 16.100.N0 13 13 NGL WARDISORId 5.6%.WO 1.160.000 ]1.166.W0 13.412.000 l!.%9.ON I 60.533.0W I06.U6.N0 101.66d.000 1] 16 Ne NyxN 6 4[ry-Over to Next Year 1.]]e.OW 0.W6.000 O.U3.0N 1.93].0W 9.U9.W0 1.116.W0 L.NO•WO 10.100.ON 16 19 XNt YN[•e Dry 9erao6 0w M XpuIIOunN 1.104.010 6.100.000 I.IU.OW S.s00.000 1.190.000 1JW.N0 13.13,.000 12.739,000 1! 16 Ntl MIYY1 or (Deficit) 5.0110W 3.5141"W 3.66N.W0 1.U6.WO a.LO.OW I i.LerOW 0.161,000 1.Na.No 16 11 ."1. IWl, ..I. Omer Pee 9N %5 filer M30 e165 Im ll le Xuete[ Of COuiv I. We11109 to 16.1W 19.4W 16.1W 76.0W 11.100 U.ON L l9 ON tex 0eor Yeea N.1W.lN M.06.OW W.•W.NO IN,9U.000 t13.101.500 ter.OW.ON L N08YY NNNENn OB DIamm W. 1 6120/90 BTATO®IT W FSCkYl CTN MIN FLOE Pep 2 9I94L yV.Pa 1990-1991 TI@WOX 1999-2000 LINE 1n0-91 111.12 199]-9l ME-96 1914-95 5-Yee[ TOW 1995-2000 10-Yo[ 1.1 LIO! WITH. PURIM 1 20 Nurvee 6 Cu[Y-war Pm Lut Yw[ 0,096,000 19,136,000 6,030,000 14,373,00 ],]30,000 0,086,000 -------- ----- 20 _ -- p192N8 21 CNeftuetlm Oren. 100,000 1p.000 10,000 21 SI Pue, 4nuW. 456,No 1,673,000 1,]9],000 11848,000 1,939,00D 7,673,000 11.263.00 10.9]6,000 22 23 INut". Pate .26.000 165,00D 167,000 192,000 231,00D 0a1.000 1,712.000 .....,coo 23 N U. Pe n 24 I. Ole N Ce9 El no. 1,061,NO 162,000 ]96,000 333.00 190,000 2,12],000 1,995,000 I,116,00D 25 26 iete.. f Xlewllvum,e II¢ou 967,000 $21,00 652,000 769,000 ]il,NOD 3,560.000 4,552,000 8.1121000 26 21 DONE Is. 25,000,"0 29,0a0,000 aO,OW,Ooo 20,000,000 ]0,000,000 27 20 Otlwe .vuve 5111N0 29 MaL MPANS 28,201... 2,782,000 27,962.000 3.113.ND 2.721.000 i 54,305.000 31,522,000 103.827'.. 29 20 MAL APNWW MNIND ]6,203.00 .1.9.1.00 31.9]].000 13.515.000 10,051,000 72,311.000 631661.00D 111,9..000 10 31 2[Pd1,I211Ptl ------------ 32 5.[e O5 Nll YO[. Tru.ent P1Nt 10,]]1.000 ' .,.i,ow 1],6]1.00D 9,1a],000 6,660,00 03,]]7,000 16.900,000 64,230,000 ,230,000 ]] ]] NO ft 411wtim B}et® 760.000 1.900,D00 203.D00 762,000 ]10,000 ].166.000 900.000 I.Si0,000 13 11 . peymrte 2.322.000 1.]90,000 3,750.. I61.000 6.M6.D00 6.166,000 11 ]] DONE leeuenw ]r9w0 ],------0 ],3so,oW -------- --------- --------- ]s 36 mn, ®P9m1TOPP0 17,153,000 17,101,000 1],6D1,000 10,108,000 ""0.000 i69.]6].000 20,167,000 89.910,000 26 ]] .serves f 4[[y-O9er to N.. Yee[ 11,1311000 6.015,000 16.]]3,000 713,01000 3,131,000 2,630.000 33,516.000 22,003,000 ]] ]e OIMIe P.11y Nelde.e Wwrtim On 82.200 $2,310 62.530 12,660 02.]]0 8].S4O ]8 39 Xw.r Of H. aplvelNt Yn11Lq E. 200 300 300 300 300 ]OD 19 ID ..mted CamevtiN Iu [rme 1451.000 11,6]].000 11,757,000 $.....coo 11,9]9..00 02,670,000 20 BOIOLNY 61 ft. Y. 6 r--ry�O Prm Luf yeu 16,716.000 21,469,000 12,109,000 22,315,NO 18.252.000 16.716,000 1l,]11,000 ll.716,000 61 62 MAL NYNO] 6,1313' DO 11.301,.0 39,084,000 16,854,000 19,96f,00D 121,975,000 154.170,000 276,.9,0N 62 41 TOO"AYAIWN MNIN 50,029,000 ]9.110,000 61,163.N0 N.249,000 ]f,B16,000 ...691.DOD 16],20],000 29I,661.N0 13 61 TC.L NEREM. PN 22,560,0. 27,061,000 20,1691000 21.991,DD0 22.491,000 124.8.5,000 1u" ],000 291,670,000 16 If Nu[ves f 4[fy Ore[ . X6tt Yae[ 2].109,000 12,109.000 22,393,000 15.253,000 12,317,000 11.006.000 40.796,000 401293,000 65 66 Xut YOec•e 0[Y NrL. Mtl1n0 P.iruente 21704,000 6.5.0,M 5,502,000 6,906.000 ].)90,0N 7,390.0NO 12,731,000 13.739.000 li 47 IND NOLNC2 OR IONICITT 24,761,000 7,a29,ND 16,81],000 8,345, 00 4,527.000 1,016.000 39.D5a.000 27,511.000 41 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY P��TATloN �0`,,Volitan Or CIS, V,9& J sa 0 _ a UO v y (P Since oRg1954 8GE COUNT-t _ BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1990-1991 FISCAL YEAR COORSI BMIIAIIOB DISH= NO. 2 6/20/90 B0008S RBLWO® TIONB Page 1 1990-91 lIBCAL YGR ^ DI812 = 42 BOMIIARY APPPD9® APPPOP® RBCdO® w DBBCR2PiION OR ACCOONT 1'ISLB BOOOBS BOOM ff D 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 ^ RAi)O3RBMID , Oaatati 6 Capital Ra9uitaoanta: Op .tim Pund 24,522,000 24,828,000 35,161,000 Carotn0Llon llalda 31,495,000 17,268,000 58,310,000 * ^ Capital Pac utiaa Pund 58,322,000 * 48,417,000 t 64,996,000 808-S AL OP TIRO a CAPITAL 114,339,000 90,513,000 158,467,000 O t Ratitaaa Bond anQ Intanat flan - 1931 46,250 + B0M am Intanat T - L958 411,756 e 80B-S AL RMRE2 458,006 0 0 =n RBpUI� 114,797,006 90,513,000 158,467,000 W COUMTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 6/20/90 BUDGET RECODO<NmATIORB Pegs 2 e 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR DISTRICT 22 SUMMARY AP[TOv® APPPDv® RECOMMENDED D®CNIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET BDDGBT m 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 FUNDING: Ovr•t1Yq a Lmital FNndfm, ey C•eM A 1. is (Appmprla M Psaarna and Carry- r) 94,478,000 69,158,000 44,079,000 m OCD•r Ravema+ 12,687,000 + 13,412,000 + 105,560,000 Anticl tod Tax Allawti0n Ftm 14 Levy 7,174,000 7,943,000 9,808,000 SUB-TOTAL OP TINE a CAPITAL 114,339,000 90,513,000 158,467,000 Dobt M iraRmt L•eb 6 Invutaanta (Appropriated Be..$ A Carry-Over) 444,082 OtMr R•vtue 13,924 A t RS by Taxaa for D•bt Obligation m SOB-!OTAL DEBT =IRMOXT 458,006 0 0 TOTAL FUNDING 114,797,006 90,513,000 158,467,000 + Adjusted for ItK•x-PNmd Tru fam e Slu Oornty is pre ly iWoundiM tams 0oOretion with • dispute aver ass•estl valuation. Tama ippmatled as _+ of 3uu 30th m t to 4181,195. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 1tiM k BUDGET BECC 0 DATIONS 1990-81 Piecal Year I POND 12 OPERATING L ESTIMATED V APPROVED APPROVED ACTOAL RECOMMENDED DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BODCET BUDGET EEPENDITORES BURG" 1988-89 1989-90 1989-90 1990-91 I � OPERATING Li Director., Pees 15.000 13.000 12,300 15,000 Jul Contractual Services Store of Joint operating 11,469,000 14,232,000 11,892,200 14,931,000 Trunk Maintenance 196,000 196,000 117.900 196,000 9V Manhole Line and Net Nall Repair. 25,000 25,000 25,000 Puy Station Maintenance 115,000 115,000 43,300 115,000 1 Pereit and Ind.Na.te Adeln. 295,000 370,000 562,100 601,000 L Connection Pea Alain. 43.000 245.500 231.900 248,000 Intar-Dist. Saver U. Charge 2,000 2.000 1,800 2,000 Bond Collection Expense 1,000 1.000 - Tax/Pea Collection Expense 22.000 19,800 19,800 54,000 Treseurer'a InI.Oteent Ada. 6 Banking Peea 65,000 55,200 37,300 53,000 Otil itiee 59,000 54,000 43,300 50,000 User Pan Expense 0 18,000 38.900 300,000 Professional Services 10,000 15,000 57,000 10,000 y Printing And P,bllwtion 1,000 1,000 600 1,000 V Travel 6 Meeting - Directors 2,000 1,500 900 2,000 Uncollectible Account. 2,000 2,000 2,90U 2,000 17 Y TOTAL OPERATINO 12,316,000 15,366,000 13,062,000 16.605,000 VON-OPERATING Interest D 45,000 44,300 Expenses Applicable to Prior Years 1,000 1,000 1,000 L TOTAL NON-OPERATING 1,000 46,000 0 1,000 y ; TOTAL OPERATING A MOM-OPERATING 12,317,000 15,412,000 13,062,000 16,606,000 RESERVES A".peiation for Contingencleo 6,046,000 1,710,000 10,252,000 u Authorized General eeeerva 6,159,000 7.706.000 8,303,000 1v TOTAL RESERVES 12,205,000 9,416,000 0 18,555.000 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 24,522,000 24,828,000 13,062,0001 35,161,000 tBlt 11 V COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 Pg. 2 m BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/28/90 1890-91 Tieeal Year m FUND 42 OPRRATINC ESTIMATED APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL RECOMMENDED DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUOCRT E2PENDIIURES BUDGET 1988-89 lose-90 1989-90 1990-91 m AVAILABLE FUNDING Cenh A Inveetasnts w (A,,.,T ated Reserve. end Cn -Over) 13,630,000 9,366,000 10,123,100 9,699,000 �w Fees 2,543,000 2,252,000 2,312,900 2,660,000 Veer Pea. 0 0 13,470,000 m Intereat A nice. Receipts 916,000 666,000 1,003,500 524,000 Deli.....t Tax.. 259,000 396,000 559,900 546,000 SUB-TOTAL 3,718,000 3,314,000 3,876,300 17,200,000 Tex Allocation 6,969,000 7.367,000 7.389,000 8,040,000 m Redevelo cant Agency Pere-through 20,000 22,000 36,400 37,000 Subventions 1s5,000 158,000 172,500 185,000 e SUB-TOTAL 7,174,000 7,547.000 7,597,900 8,262,000 Trenater Taw Capital NM 0 4,601,000 e TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 1 24.522,000 24,828,000 21,507,300 35,161,000 COUNn SANITATION DISTRICT NO.2 Page 1 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/28/90 L, 1990-01 FISCAL YEAH FUND F2 CAPITAL FACILITIES ESTIMATED 1� AFPROv® APPROVED ACTUAL RECOMMENDED ` OBSCHIPTION OR ACCOUNT nTIE BUDGET B000E7 EXPENDITURES BUDGET 1988-89 1989-90 1989-90 1990-91 PgO38CS6 AND 8%PHNDTNfl63 I i Treatment Plant Hxpa�ion 16,494,000 10,3SO,000 29,641,000 u Appropriation for Master-planted Sreatsent Plmt Pacilitiee 35,950,000 4,321,000 19,122,000 Radio Linked Telemetry Syatem 25,000 ' 1 I Santa Ana River Interceptor, 2-14H 400,000 450,000 322.000 4al Replace Fullerton-Brea Intercepter Contract 2-25 � � L Liability to Alahei,e for So. Santa Ana River Trunt 100,000 100,000 100,000 South River Treuk Erteeelon 240,000 Sast Richfield Interceptor, 2-22 500,000 50,000 64.000 Hevhope/Placentia Relief Se ers U 1. South Aneheia Belief Sever, 2-27 1,490,000 1,000,000 481,000 100,000 2. Netella Relief, 2-28 1,100,000 1.100,000 36,000 1,100,000 3. Orangewood Diversion, 2-29 1,20D,000 43,000 1,200,000 Euclid Interceptor Sewer 5,200,000 { 1. Oramg w to Broadway, 2-26 3,200,000 2,749.000 1,000,000 2. Edinger to lcapeon, 2-26-2 6,583,000 8.700,000 91999,000 1.000,000 3. Broadway to Orangethorpe, 2-26-3 1,187,000 8,000,000 183,000 8,500,000 4. I plan to Orangewood, 2-29-1 3,100,000 L North Branch of Rolling Hill. Subtrunk Belief, 2.11-3 400,000 425,000 870,000 50.000 1 ' Batav ie/Linen In irwk Relic[ 300,000 Iri Joint works Equity Purnhum, 524,000 509,000 8arthquaka/Flood Damage eeeerva. 1,152,000 1,438.000 1.433,000 V Appropriation for Diatrict FaCilitlea IaDroveaente and V Expansion 1,135,000 875,000 44.000 11750,000 SUBTOTAL 58,322.000 48.417,000 25,650.000 64,996.000 Trawofer to Operotiag Fund 4.601.000 Transfer to Construction Fund 7,295,000 2,363,000 COP Peyaent Transfer to Const.Pund 4,141,000 4,198,000 1 V TOTAL REgUIERmAR`fS 69.758,000 59,579,000 25,650,000 64,996.000 Ur m COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.2 Page 2 BUDGET RECOI "ATIONS 6/28190 m 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR POND 42 CAPITAL FACILITIES se ESTIMATED APPROVED APPROVED AM" RECOMMENDED DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BBDOBT EEPENDITURH9 BVOCET d 1988-89 1989-90 1989-80 1990-91 AVAILABLE TIMING Cash 6 Investments (Appeuptiatad Eaastyea And Carry-over) 61,427,000 49,653,000 50,724,700 22,932,000 Tranefet from Construction Fund 29.641,000 e= Construction Orents 790,000 790,000 S96,000 286,000 Connection Fees 850,000 4,909,000 4,6S8,000 4,959,000 m [Idustrlal Veete Fare 1."1.000 920,000 945,000 1,087,000 p Sale of Capaeity Rights 1,365,000 1,349,000 908,DDO 3.317,000 joint Norte Equity Sale 307.000 697,000 w Intoreet and Miac. Haceipte 3,919,000 1,968,000 3,897,000 2.077.000 SUBTOTAL 8,272,000 9,926.000 11,004.000 42.064.000 e Transfer from 1951 Bond Fund 1,000 0 Transfer frog 1958 gad Fund 58,000 0 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 69,7S8,000 S9,579,000 01.728,700 61.996,000 Vr COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 6/19/90 mm BODOBT RECOMMENDATIONS 1990-91 FISCAL MR 4, POND 82 CONSTRUCTION/1986 V ESSINASED APPROVED APPPOV® ACTUAL RECOMMEND® DESCRIPTION OR ACCOONS TITLE BDOCBT BOOOHT EEPffiIDITORES BODGES 1988-89 1989-90 1989-90 1990-91 L PROJECTS AND EEPENOITORE.y Treatment Plaz Empanaion 27,354,ODD 13,070,000 7,494,000 Reserve for Future Inatallment0 7,785,000 W SUB-TOTAL 27,354,000 13,070,000 7,494,000 7,785,000 V COP Install t Payments 4,141,000 4,198,000 4,199,500 4,164,000 L4/ 1T#AL REODIR@O s 31,495,000 17,268,000 11,693,500 11,949,000 AVAILABLE FONDINO V Cash end Investment. (Appropriated Reservee end y Cerry-Owr) 19,421,000 10,139,000 10,755,100 11,448,000 Internet A NSem. ReCefpte 638,000 568,OD0 933,100 501,ODO V Transfer from Capital Tob 7,295,000 2,363,DD0 0 Li SOB-TOTAL 7,933,000 2,931,000 933,100 501,000 SNAMSM FOR INSTALLNERS PA)aagm Old ,O COP Payment Traz fer from Capital Tod 4,141,000 4,198,000 4,198,000 SOSAL AVAILABLE PUNDINO 31,495,000 17.268,000 15,886,500 31,949,000 r✓ u u COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 6/19/90 s BUDGET RECOIOEDIDATIONs 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR r FUND r2 CONSTRUCTION /1990 y ESTIMATED APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL RECOHI@NDED DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BOOM BUDGET BHPffilDITON88 BUDGET 19B8-B9 1989-90 1989-90 1990-91 PROJECTS AND REPR.RDITGRR9 Transfer to Capital Facilities 29,641,000 Debt Issuance Coat 11,000,000 r Reserve for Nester plan ProjGite 35,361,000 TOTAL pHQpIRB1EDRB 0 0 0 76,002,000 AVAILABLE FUNDING Caab mid Imeatssnts s (Appropriated Reeervee eM Carry-over) Proceeds from EorrGNiag 75,000,000 Interest A Ni6c. Receipts 1,002,000 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 0 O 0 76,002,000 d e W n a a a a a n a a a a n a a a a a a a lW0]Y SANITATION DISTRICT M.] 6/19190 WOm04f W BIB]BI61 (aW.BLT]ON BUM oactmfe mjBpl C.LP - 91-9] 199]-9] 199]-96 199496 j p-Yeee 441 1915-2000 10.Yesr R41 uchintY t0 MWY for I BouN Bella Nu mono frwM 100,000 100,000 100,000 10D,000 BwN me. f[wt 4tw1m (]) 250.000 250,000 250,000 260,00 B.A.B.I. Belief (]) 1,400,000 0 7,400,000 9,400,000 BpuOop/Pl.mrtle "net Beeete 1. . 4uBe]e Belief Scoot, ]-1] (1) 581,000 681,000 100,000 100,000 I..,Ooo 1. 441L Wild, ]-]B (B) 1,1]6,000 36.000 110001000 100,400 I,100,wo 111001000 ]. Ocugar0e0 MwrotM. ]-]91]) 1,].1,000 t],DM 1,MO,000 ]DD,MO 1,200,000 1,20D,000 Bu410 In4rw9tM fever 1. floo,o ced to BrwMwY, ]-]6 41) 3.749.000 2,169,000 1,000,OM 1.000.O00 1.00.000 I. Believes t0 LUMon, I-]6-] (1) a0,999,Ow 9,999.000 1,000,000 1,M0,000 1,000,000 ]. Broadway M OtvpNorp. 2-26-3 (I) e,6e].Ow a03.000 I.600.0,00 11000,000 0.5001000 8,500,00 Borto BtuW 0f b1LLn9 Mille BwBtnmY YLaf, 1-11-9 (]) 920.000 Bt0,M0 BO,MO 901000 50,00 8oa.e Bewt Sellff (3) 490,000 O oO,Ow 450,00 Be<avas/LfkDln fleet A&U.1 (]) 118,000 1 n...w 315,000 3ID,000 left Interceptoc fewer, ]-6-] (]) 1,6w,aM 0 1,600,000 1,600,000 ".Humus mi.. 1,I50,0M 116,000 175,000 175,000 176,000 176,00 875,000 410,MO 1,750,000 0wM TOTAL .9,176.000 18,361,000 11,925,000 1,870,000 620,000 176.000 800,Ow 38,890,w0 10,3I5.000 24,B15.000 ]. 1Y04t-,1. feo111t1Y Preeenti, ,otl.r cmuttuction ]. Xeetet-Blemrd 4t511t1u pteextly uwet design ]. moef -9l. 4elLLWe .1M for Wtwt. d..l9n/tWttwotl0e "• Male wl19nH OI...H. ] BPeIN 1 rtaiiMl3 N MY.ew MY lNe I rIBOLL NNN IM-1991 iNNH IM-3000 L]Xt HH-N I09I•62 IH3-0 I.N-N .BN-N i !-irr ..I NN-]Ne l0-}..r ioYl LIN 3 Y..ay.s a furrvOv.r M1v.Ws ire ......M0 la,Ns,aM N,w,ON N,1H,Ha sa.m.o e ; B,aN.Mo N,aaa,NO a,sN.Mo 1 mmvr a aaua a as au Yloutbo a,Ha,Mo B,en,oM 10,2+0,M0 u.uB,Me N•Na,MO t ll,au,MO aa,Nl,aM I31,ua,OPo a a rr.: Ieauoarla .1. 3.Nalm 3•0I9,00 3.516.00 B.M.MO a,asa,aM t 111234.000 N.01.000' 54,01+.0" a I M. M la,n0,M0 u.H1.0a0 u.Ha•M0 ]e.lo.00 n•BN.00 t 107.413. M 160,121•00 ]1a.aN.aH B a N4..a a X\.o.u.mu I— NB,MO N.. 1,in'No \,ue,0a0 I,501,000 t a•n],MB u•u+•MO 1v,laB,MB ! 6 ote.r u..nn. t a I M.NY]NR ]9.46]•000 al,Bst,a00 al•N0•M0 41,716,00 u,w,MO ( 182•513,00 ]N.M.No 411.353.aM ! e l:Ru awwu MaNs 3.,1.... N•620.0. aI.N.I. 1s..,.. M H.w.MO 1 M.N.... u0,3N,eM 4.7.m.MO a __________ _-----___ NPNOIMN I B BO.e. .l AM It X a 0 N"".000 1+,111,000 11.Na•NO 30.031.s. N,aH2OM 1 0.Na.MO N].BN.NO 121.010.00. B la M11.NIN --a M 10.m OtWr OBse. I.N1.000 I.M."o 1.N1.000 1.ON.OM S.ON.OM t B.M.w Il.N0.N0 ]1.M0.000 10 11 W0t Nrvlw --3.,r irlM.a00 I1.OM.000 11,N0.wo 1a.0M•OM a6.aM.OPo U.M.N. 111..00.000 II 1] OeN Nrviw ••lNB 1um ••N1.-M t.010,--- -----MO ....... -------- N Ia 10114 N N INN 161M.NO W.M.O. f0.001.000 af.all.MO 40.545.040 ( IN.fsB•ON ]N,Na.m 443,113,OM la u a fury-m'r M IMra lm N,616,0M N,os0,000 30,739.00 36•956.0.0 ...BN•000 35.443.004 N.M.. 43.31O.. N IO M:X i.v.Dn .1.a rutlW apetrs.nt. ..M.. 13.216,000 1s,N6,M0 N•1N•Poo ]].na.MO 21•+13,000 N.NLHO 341•943.000 1s le nms ul.ne.m (Mrtolt! 10.253,000 10,Na,OM 15•6N.ON 14.199.0. u.em•OM i u.6f0,Ma 8.328,000 ease•. 16 ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... : ........... ........... ........... 16 SL le r..11y lOaex,m i—I M IN N! $90 6100 NN ON is 1+ l i—lmt .111" Onit. Nt.M 347.Na 3N•aa0 Ni.Ne 31a,6M ]NdN 11 N a.urf.e umr rr. N.a+0,0o0 n6.N1.Me NlAaa.NO ua.16a.0aa NI.M.eM n+.ON,Mo 1B mxTT @rtmw ozmzrt w. x 6Bxe3w rteTVDar or mlmw em r1m Yn a rIBDLL ifYd IBBO-lwl fY0000 108E-i0w ' 1800-01 lwl-H I0w-0] lM]-0t 18H-B! 0-}iY}oW {WB-Sm l0.Tau}BYI ]O 4wrvw 8 Grel-nar 0{P Wt TiY H.HO,Ow 88,318,000 H,]S],Ow w.N0.000 H,ISI,PoDi N,d.O,OPo 38,0I6,m N,aw,pw SO 6srtw6 31 •bnntaavtlw OmY 288,000 I HBrOw HB4OPo it if 9iw, OmceW i.wB4Ow S.IB8.000 l.i3B.000 S,H].Ow 8.N0.OPo I if.N1.Po0 H,HO,w5 N.N],OW 11 xa loOruYlY Wau LONpw Li]pOw L3]B.wO IASLOw 1,0w.000 I 1,]]1,w0 N.N6.Ow ii,m,OPo x> N OYs 3w. ]0 26 Yb o! hgelq Blp,tn ],]11,000 0N,000 I,IOB,wO 031,Ow Sw,Ow 1 B.Hi.000 S,AO,PoO l3,wi3Ow l8 SB lw.eYt a IIIM11— 1mr 3,BBO,wO 3,YB,PoO 3,HB,wO 3,111,Po0 2,O ,Iw ll:W Dw 1],NI,PoO w,lwrDw 36 31 Yw DMt 16,w0,000 ]0,000,OPo NSwO,Ow HS,OPo,wO 31 Sl OIM. w.ww 8Bi,000 18 I .__ . ._ __ U . N f11TLL @]m 01,]38,Ow 10,]OS,Ow 81,Sel,Ow H,NS,wp N,iO],Ow I zw,ald,Ow ad,636,Dw 11I,011,Ow 30 N ioru evelWY a@1w 1n,3w,m fe,afa,ow wpH,oPo nsPo,Poo rt,wa,00D I N1p60,oPo 1Nsel,D3o 3H.]o1.Po6 ]6 N IWn of JB t vY]. rrYlwnt 1Wt 29,H{,000 .01131.00 35,815.000 H.id3,ow H2OH,wo ( n1,m3.w0 38,61S,DPo 1.12M.0 31 ]] W.IliY G{1eotW 8ntw n.0x8.000 l,ttl,Ow SS..Ow 1$,Dw SB0,000 ( H,SBO.. 10.336.000 24.816,w0 H N YDt 8m'lw-1W8 lww 3.164.00 3.133.wD S,MI,PoO 13.3W,OPo 1i,dBi,wO N N wat IYYwr GUY W Bwrro 11.00.000 11.00.000 1 ]1.w0.Ow S3.OPo.PoO N 35 OtOY YpwOIYYr 31 N fOTLL @8wS1V@ l8,xd0,000 t8,dil.w0 31.]il,Ow N,tSB,Dw 18,SB1,OPo Sw.3H,w0 38.0BO... ......D00 N N a.Bervo 3 Gen-Y.e b SYt iiee Y.S18.000 N,SB].w0 80,1t0,PoD iB.61 dw 3B4O18.000 ]L]10,w0 tB,3BLOw ie,eY.Ow N ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ( .......e.. ...r....u. .. ........ t I ( N SN]11ai IeOlwtne ]w lnue•],me fewGre) ( N ]0 OBwn.n a lYery-Gie Iao Wt TiY Si,O80.w0 13.13I.00 63.4N.000 01.SO1.Po0 81.OT0,Ow i8.010.W0 13.H0.Po0 Y.w0.000 30 10 Gul Bwwun I13.380,0w --- -- 110.60\.000 --------- 31.513.Ow ]83.N8.w0 N].]N.Ow H0.383.ON 30--- LL btY enlleBY 3xtlW 158,S81,Ow 1H.380.w0 113.2N.000 It6,Yl,Ow 138.SBl,Ow I i1B.w1,000 S38,1S3,OPo 1.,313.. H iS inul eapwltwBi 13.3H.000 lS.1N.Ow Bi,030.w0 81.818.000 BB m'.. all.Hl.wO 333.9Y.wO 101.120.00 03 _ Y a Eu'n-Oin b IMat TeY 89.M.Ow 63.0]4w 81.308.000 BI,Ol8.w0 1d.330.w0 1 13.762.w0 03.0]I.wO BS.zN.Ow t3 ti xut iYe•U Dn PirIBO I,W W BawiewanaU 0.303.00 13,213.000 13.]86.Ow I8.15S.0w S].113.Ow N.1131w0 33.%S.m N.Y3.00 33 _ t3 NN B1WC]M.I D]3lClT1 10.m.OPo 81.8{8.000 13.8tl.Ow 33.NO.PoO SO.1N.Ow 30.B90.w0 11.D88,OPo 11.xdl.w0 i3 ........... ........... ..uu..... ........... .v.v..... 1 .u........ ........v ........ n Bme1n rvny B..bum.Gnnw..m Yn $2.380 3z,]Bo Y,em u,eb tz,Jrz Y,NB tl tf mmv r "IN" Wlmlwt M.umP bun x,ll! ;Me 2.111 z,us z,ns x.l2s iB i9 9na ma... Carviwr'Inn 9e. Inwce H.959.Ow 15,19P.u00 IS.i19.Y00 {S.ii2.Y00 le.O19.000 tl.eB3.000 i0 _ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY PNvTATfON toPolitan IS Oro O `0 P � w `since 1951, .i �gNGE COU�� BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1990-1991 FISCAL YEAR COOIISY SMIMIOB DISMC2 80.3 6/20/90 BODG82 BBCgO®IOATIOBS Page 1 1990-91 PIBCAL VIM DIBSAICS 83 SOBllAM APPBOPSD APPB008O BBCOIDDSNDBD DBBCIUFIIOB W ACCWBf TIME BODGBS BDDGeS B=ft 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 ' BHOOIA0G3NS8: Owratitg i Caiital Bam4ireaente: Operating Putl 21,169,000 24,746,000 42,645,000 Couslruction Mod 34,027,000 18,746,000 63,049,000 Capital Pacilitlaa MaN 33.852,000 *1 47,362,000 • 69,836,000 BOB-113SA6 OPBBASIBO 6 CAPISAL 109,048,000 91,354,000 175,530,000 Debt 8atiru , Bond and Inbr t PDnd 608,000 71,000 35,000 SOB-TOTAL IIBOOIBtOm128 600,000 01,000 35,000 TOTAL RBOOIB81001T0 109,656,000 91,425,000 175,565,000 *Adjusted for I Ur-M Sra fort CWIITY 6 ITATION DISTRICT N0. 3 6/21/90 BUDORl RHODID®IMTImff Pe9e 2 1990-91 visC YBAR w DIUTNICT 03 BOMIANY w APPPDP® APPADV® RRCOD091D6D DUeCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITGB HOD08T BUD(DtT BDDU6Y 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 "' PONDINO m QMrutlfw A Cavital amum• M. LaeD A ImYtaanta (A"ropriated Ramrwee and Carry- r) 89,631,000 62,792,000 55,782,000 OtDer Ileve,Ye 9,972,000 * 18,235,000 • 108,361,000 AIK pstsd Tu Allocatlon Pro. 1% Lw 9,445,000 10,171,000 11,153,000 SOB-TOTAL OP TING A CAPITAL 109,048.000 91,198,000 175,296,000 ce DaDt Retlraeent CaaD A Imeatemte (Appropriated Rsaerwas A Carry-0asr) 108,000 84,aao 269,000 ONer Amerwe 6,000 4,000 Aaount Aa1aM by Taiga for s Debt ODli9atlon 494,000 1]9,000 6UN-TOTAL Dmr MTIR6I®IT 608,000 227,000 269,000 TOTAL IRNDINO 109,636,000 91,425,000 175,565,000 -Adjusted for Inter-P Transfer. She Cou y is presently impounding tsxes in oonnsc ion it a dispute over asmesed valuation. Tams 3apo v ae of June 3M sxp to $220,688. CWPTY SANITATION DISTRICT M. 3 Peye 1 y BODGES RBCOIDfliEDATIONS 6/19/90 1990-91 FORD 13 OPERATING r✓ EDTDL%TED APPROVED APPROVED Ac2M RECfBB�ED L DE8C8IPSION OR ACCODAS MLE BUMGMT BUXW B3SPEDDITOIA9 BODGES 198"s 1989-90 1989-90 1990-91 OPERATING u Director.' F. 31,000 30,a" 27,800 30,000 Contractual 8er im 8 of Joint Operating 12,265,000 14,156,000 12,047,200 15,096,000 Trunk Naintanunp 225,000 225,ON 141,800 225,000 Op.tr Odor Control 200.000 200,000 91,800 150,000 e+ Pa' Linn end Net Nell Repairs 473,NO 475,000 76,300 3,000,000 Po@ Station XaLDtenanoE 175,000 175,000 147,400 300,000 Penmit and Ind.guts Admin. 120,000 120,000 218,600 234,000 rj Comrc . F. Admin. 45,000 114,100 121,300 114,000 Inter-Dist. eeuer 0" Clu 1,000 1,000 700 1,000 Bool Collection Expense 1,000 1,000 100 11000 Tax/Pn Collection Expaue 28,000 u,900 44,400 47,000 r Sreuurer I Imestamt Ada. 6 Banking Pen 61,200 53,No 36,DDD 46,000 f Ci Olitin 150,000 150,000 106,S00 125,000 �I Omer Pee Experme 30,000 346,000 25,Z00 365,000 Pro/enio Servieas 25,000 20,W0 58,000 20,000 u Printing And Publication 2,500 3,000 2,600 3,000 Y Srevel A Mrlirg - OSrecton 1,500 2,000 1,500 2,000 Oncolleetibl. Accounts 1,800 2,000 2,800 2,000 5>♦ TOTAL OPeILtTINO 13,838,000 36,U8,000 U11801000 19,761,000 XON-0PBMSING I 1 Interest 1,NO li exp x AP licabl. to Prior Ye 2,000 2,No 2,000 L TOTAL NON-OFE ARTNG 3,000 2,0001 2,000 TOTAL OP®LASIPO E POJI-0PBAASIMO 0,841,000 I6,140,000 U,38O,000 19,]63,000 J RESERVES Appropriation for CwKingancl rs 407,000 336,000 13,000,000 YI Autbarired G .l Renr,a 6,921,000 8,070,000 9,802,000 TOTAL REB8R 7,328,000 8,606,000 22,862,000 e° TOTAL RD20IR8X n 21,169,000 24,746,000 13,180,000 42,645,000 Lr u r fDOPTY BUITATION DIBTEICT W. 3 Pa9N 2 BUBB= 88WBDBIMTION5 6/19/90 1990-91 POND 23 OFBNATIEG ESTIMATED APPAOVED APPNOVED AOTOAL EBQfODdDED DeBONIPTIOU ON AOLO0IR TITLE BUD05S BOIXiBS BAPEIIDST9AH8 BODGE! ® 1988-89 1989-90 1969-90 1990-91 AVAILABLE FONDINO CUP ■ LlvaatNanL (Approprlat4 Ba"s Yld C ry- ) 9,921,000 4,969,000 6,019,100 14,545,GOO F. 850,000 1,336,000 1,504,000 1,730,000 mr a. F. 7,769,000 8,162,400 13,890,000 IM Mwt 4 Mae. N ipta 611,000 "1'000 709,500 1,327,000 m DNllrmu TaNaa 342,000 509,000 712,500 722,000 BOB-TOTAL 1,803,000 10,115,000 11,068.400 17,669,000 TU Allouti0n 9,200,000 9,469,000 9,395,600 10,223,000 BUPvantiom 245,000 203,000 219,000 206,000 w✓ SOB-TOTAL 9,445,000 9,662,000 9,614,600 10,431,000 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 21,169,000 24,746,000 26,722,100 42,645,000 NOEff BABISATIOS DISTAICS $0.3 Pa9. 1 w BUDM ABLVOaB TIOAB 6119/90 1990-91 rIBCAL YEM ..I FM 93 CAPITAL FACILITIES ®TIMATSS W APPP➢V® APPItlIV® AL�Du 9ELL0®0)® DB FTIOB OR AMCKEFT TITLB BOfN:63 BODDET PIPBSOIMRS SUDOZZ LIM-49 1909-90 1989-90 1990-91 Peo18CS9 A.D RP81mITOBBB r Tt.admt PI r.c1114p 17,919,000 11,261,000 32,330,000 Approprlltion for M r-pI T[NtBd,,t PL P1c111t1Y 20,613,000 4,684,000 I8,994,000 Mute[ PIN/MIA Update 125,000 r Wa O r M'. for Baal Bum Blvd. pup Btetion [tatty 85,000 eadi0 L T.leatr, Sy. 15,000 y Bu. A9.. p�p Bution B.P.W Smt9a, 11-12 23,000 1,100,OUo a.l 6rott hn.rtlp[or S.uMla 9apalr,3-34e 1301000 200,000 A111a[ AOldu T B . Palup. 1. Vault 9tl.U11 tBtim, 0-20A 4,300,000 11200,000 9a8,000 V 2. B o1. eYu011SUU., 3-]]e ]1]001000 3,500,000 Oros SU Pap"c , 1-14A 320,000 A[Wia 8tum 6uDtnmk R.lia! 62,000 300,000 nUar tleldu Pali.! 21000,000 V✓ iap.rial wu.e unara,ptcr SDO,oao 1,430,000 ora /VBB a 8ODt1tuA wu.l, 3-25 soo,000 1,200,000 41,000 1,200,000 ermm 0! 8orna—wu m 300,000 400,000 r_ Now.r-Butern 8u0trA e.1S.f on rr.0 400,000 8U0,000 I+Raan lS,bitlpto[ S.u.[, 3-24-2 350,000 1,.00,000 56,000 1,60D,WO 4 E a Pucm.w Pali.! 6,700,000 vawou. eau.! Paver 800,000 1,1501000 B« mu.t M. vuv.m t0 Festal 5,200,000 5170o,aao Lo. A to. BuOmmt ea14! 11200.00 4,400,000 4,700,aao r eucmau oe Cap.uty !rtl D Btriet u 1150010" 650,coo ao1 vorkd E9ulty puma. IS.000 Bartnpuax./Hord Duaq. Pa9.ev. 1,244,000 1,563,oa 1,5621000 A".prl.tla, for Dl.Uim FBr131ti.a IBprevtlnna and mmaralon soo,000 I,0a5,Ot0 22,000 2,000,000 SUB-TOTAL 53,851,000 42,362,000 12,]]1,000 69,816,000 Tr.9nl.r to Cwtruttlon P,ud 7,5%,000 2,209,000 ` Trwt.[ to 1951 Bad rutl CUD Pay..n[ Tr.ulu to Cant. r,etl a,a80,000 a,Sag,OOD W TOTAL RBODIIDDQORE 65,9]5,000 54,620,000 12,331,000 69,6]6,000 uv COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.3 Pegs 2 BUDGET Rfficc O)ATIONS 6/19/90 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR - FOND 03 CAPITAL FACILITIES ri ESTIMATED APPPDV® APPPDVffi1 ACTUAL RHOWENDED aeSCRZPSION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET B1P XTORBB BUDGET 19aa-89 1989-90 1989-90 1990-91 AVAILABLE RIMING Cash R Imeaben4 (Appropriated Ruerna end Carry-over) 50,530,000 58'"1'000 57,891,100 28,491,000 w Transfer Troa Canatructian Pund 32,330,000 �. C ttuctcn Grants 2,284,000 854,000 21,500 313,000 Cm0retion Fees 600,000 900,000 1,422,000 2,260,000 re I.&utrial Nuts Fes, 495,000 350,000 504,000 614,000 Sale of Capacity Rights 1,354,000 1,460,000 21,900 3,324,000 Saint Narks Equity Sele 1,000 Interst and Mier. Receipts 3,799,000 3,922,000 5,265,000 2,249,000 SUBTOTAL 8,932,000 7,494,000 7,234,400 41,=1000 rti Transfer fra. E flab 500,000 234,000 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 67,570,000 65,935,000 65,125,500 69,836,000 v COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT W. 3 6/19/90 r BODGES RBCDDDDDATION8 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR v FUND 03 CONBSROMW-1986 ESTIMATED APPROVED APPRDV® ACTUAL RHWDO<RD® DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BODGES EEPENDITURR8 BUDGET 1988-89 1909-90 1989-90 1990-91 yp FROJBC U AND ESPODITGRES TreataaM Plant Er ion 29,540,000 14,197,000 8,140,000 RaaarFa for put o Installsoms 8,984,000 r SOB-TOTAL 29,540,000 14,197,000 8,140,000 0,904,000 COP Insta].SRant Payments 4,487,000 4,549,000 4,350,200 4,512,000 J TOTAL RBQUrREH3U= 34,027,000 18,746,000 12,690,200 13,496,000 AVAILABLE FUNDING W Ca aM Imastsents (Appr i.r Reaerna aM W Carry-avar( 21,269,000 11,301,000 11,914,000 12,746,000 V Il sat A Nice. Receipts 675,000 687,000 1,010,900 750,000 1 Sramfer fros Capie., Faeilltias Fund 7,596,000 2,209,000 SOB-TOTAL 8,271,000 2,896,000 1,010,900 750,000 Yd TRANSFER FOR INBTALLHM PAY10=3 COP Paysant SraroGr fros Capital InaW 4,48],000 1,549,000 4,549,000 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 34.027,000 1E,746,000 17,533,900 13,496,000 V v v m CWMSY BAMISASIOM DIBSAICT NO. 3 6/19/90 BODGBf PBCOMHENDA110NB mb 1990-91 BIBCAL YEAS PO110 83 COBBSAOCTION-1990 m BBSIM m APPIM]V® APPADVBD A=" BBCCgO W DBDCAIPSIOM OM ACCOOMS SIRLE BDOGBZ BOD(ffiS HIPHNDI�OBBB BODCBS "n 1988-89 1989-90 1989-90 1990-91 Feamm AND E fre far to CYita BaclUtiN PVrM 32,330,000 m Coate of Borrowim 12,000,000 MINNa for Namur Pl Pro31rta 37,553,000 Wrn BEQUI0H10D•8B 0 0 0 81,883,000 AVAILABLE BONDING m GM end IrrvaatNnts (A"roDriatal FINNY aM CarrB-o " 0 Prooldl from BorrwiM 80,000,000 ® Ir, a t a MLe. wuiata 1,853,000 BOB-Tmn 0 0 0 81,BB3,000 m 1dfAL AVAILABLE B ING 0 0 0 81,BB3,000 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS V e/2B/90 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR r FOND 03 BOND AND INTEREST - 1951 1 1958 ESTIMATED 1 u APPROVED APPROV® acim FINXIO03MED DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BODGES i BUDGET IETPElDITUM ( 1 BUDGET 1996-69 1 1989-90 j 1989-90 j 090-91 1 � BOND RETIREMENT AND INTEREST I 1 i i Principal on Bonds 535,000 I 34,500 ( 34,500 i 34.500 I � Internet on Bonds 6,851 1,294 i 935 431 I y SUB-TOTAL 541,851 I 35,794 ! 35,435 i : 34,931 Transfer to Capital Facilities I 156,000 j 234,069 uw i AUTHORIZED GENERAL RESERVE 66,149 35,206 ! t TOTAL AEpUIFEHENT9 608,000 227,000 i i 269,000 AVAILABLE FUNDING LiCash 8 Ireeatomats I j (Appropriated Reserves and Carry-over) _ 1 108,000 I 04,000 1 288,300 I 269,000 I I Ld Irtareat 6 Mac. Receipts j 6,000 I 4,000 17,961 SUB-TOTAL j 8,000 4,000 ( 17,961 ! 0 I had AMOUNT SO HE RAISED BY SAilP I 994,000 I 139,000 ( 152,638 i Transfer from Capital Facilities I i TOTAL AVAILABLE POImIMG j 608,000 ) 227,000 j 458,899 I 269,000 6w Outstandln9 G.O. Bonds B 6/30/91: SO Final Payment Date: 1951 - August, 1990 Sr i V 1 � l � V � i V PpINR eYlrtolOY mdnlR w.] 9]I.... Ofl000N Or 010}DICP MI' MI. "AIN PROJECTS PepPPO} IM11 i O.I.P. 1220.91 1991-93 1901-0 Ina-91 uw-b I e-}mt fowl INS-2o00 IO-Pm 4m ______.. -- ___________ I --------__ ______ ----_----- ________ __-------- __--------I ___----__ ___________ ___________ tnmw e.ew6 fo4taml 4u.! 0) 330,000 1 e10,OM u0,0o0 o.d.pla PYe.Yw erm 9wtrlw Y. a eso.pRO a/o,000 650.00 613eer tw.P. I. Se a .. 11-1I li) • 1.113,0m 1 33,004, SWISS DM,Mo 1.100,000 I,IOO.o00 i Ywtelw 411e5 Iotempwe Ptwlbl (3I /.e00,000 600.000 2.00.000 • 2A00,00 ],OOo,000 6,]OO.OM wwelM Y1b1 }awt O) 100,000 i 1M,000 1M.OM i Seryr133 41l•P Ioterwptae (3) 1.800.000 i $06.00 1 S00.N0 1.N..... I,DO0,09p I— ./Yntam du9Mwt 4lw! { I Yme, 3-33 (1) 1.141.008 91,Oo0 eM.MO 900.000 ; 1.300.000 1.3M.Mo i I to P lot.t (3) 4IIM. Oamptbeq I 1 w trwew (d) 1.130.W0 i I ].IIO.Ow 3.160,000 ugo,.r/Y..tem Dub. t ulw! w }ee4 (3) wo.000 100.044 ]O0.00 1 840.000 900.ow Wpmo Sow[aepwe Ywr. 3-24-3 (3) 1.6/e.MO 65.000 I,M0.000 600.000 I 1.400.400 I.a00.000 Yapwo e.ame oe 90.r.r/wawm ID) a00.SM ; SM,YOo SOO.OM ie•ee 431.9 }rmt..4P:+m w 1•YeW (]) 6.100.000 100.000 3.000.000 5.600.000 ( 6.100.000 /.10,000 Ywl.41w, frwt. w3tea•. w 41r•n (3) e.100.M0 I 1 e.100.000 6.100.000 w. twaem eewaw 411.e (]) 4,700.900 aM.9M a,a9o.oaeRO,Ooo 6,IM.oIM.Md i o I. M 6.i IL6eam uu.e a.wr Ia> ld/o,pM i 1,150,000 1,00,00 I Illewlluwoe PwJmw 1,000,Mo I -_-----_- 300,M0 __ M_Mo_ -_ 300,Mo- _- M_oM 30o,Mo ; 1,0M,Mo 1,M0,00o 1,M0.0M ______ , _______ _________1 __.. ........... C.}MLL 36,890,000 I 130,om 3.150,000 SAWS. 6,300,000 4,900,000 3.500.000 1 19.950,Ooo IS,3M,0W 3e.77o.oM .......... 1 .......... ........... ........... ........... ........... .... .I .......... ........... ............ 1. XwwrvoleeeN lwlltsao 0nenaly w0er moetrvotlm • P.eal•I1Y I,o,ON M 01arlet w. Il 3. M tar-pl•me0 la0wltws S e.*MIY ,e wr 4.Ipo ]. Xwt.11laooeC lwllltba m .Lw to. I.. M.14/wmtrowwn I OOAA Wl»S10.OIiA]R i. ] t/19I90 Sam NW ONM10 ilp Pyf t Iig4 SNY 1p1M1 EOWMIW IMFOW 1Ai iff}9l 1M1-fa 1992-93 1MHl 1MhN i I-T.nw 1MM2000 la- N ieffl »A OfA»IA Aga 1 WttYtf i GttPWft Iia ittt Yflt 11.010.000 ».Na.000 Y.t».Ow 32.155.000 29.110.000 I 14.945.000 N.IN,OM 11,545,000 1 I N0»0[ I I a WA at 11 aN]Ymtyoo U.M.000 »1040.000 Y.099.000 31,MOrW 15,171,000 t a'M.MO M,142.000 Ua.0 .000 i ] AYr ammm mbS 1,130.000 l.fMrMO ],aM,NO 1.02.060 ].wa,Ow t U.M.000 33,461.000 10,M,0M a 1 Om Mtt y.990.000 Y.IYrW a.m.. A.NI.MO 24.771.000 1 09.01.000 iM.5101000 2901949.w0 1 0 LWtrt ] tlYSllaNv 1ne_ I'M7,o O 1,A].W 2.331.000 a,YO.W a,w].OM 1 "M'MO U.NY.Ow U,3 ].0M a { 0t0fr sN.t� 1 f a ABO AtQ]i A.sM.00D ».Na.MO 37.02L.000 11.y1.aM 11.615.000 I Y{.OL.000 331.0051000 ul.wf.W 1 f •IDU l0»W0]fOmlaO N,NO.Ow ff.INrOM NraN.OM 1]r10{rOw lfraw,0w ]M.Na.000 f]9.1N.OM 0»r N1rOM a nng-p m 9 dt1 d Jdnt aeAtl tl f O 10,OM.000 11,360.000 U.W.000 Y.TO.MO ]],ON.W 1 11,173.W Y.....1. »0.]1t,OM 9 U wlLettm aAW tl 1 O t YNC W wYO QY 1.N1.w0 ],]M,00o ,710,MO 3.1U.W 1.w6.000 t La.N1.000 ...lai.w0 U.91].M0 Y y not auvlsM a,W,ODD u,teo,OM u,aM.ON u.aM.000 t w,tN,OM 100,]Y,NO 1u.Ow.oOo U la not MN1Ya»a I.30S.000 I.345.000 I 8.7411000 ]a.Ai.Ow ao.00{,OOD u y 11120 LIMO U.>N.wO ]a.flOraM »r]M.Ow N.Nt.OM Nr]N.000 I 172.325.000 ]Y.iIO.Ow lti.»i.000 U N Wttrnt]ONta-W{t ta WL. ]].041,O90 271a».0w A.1]f.Ow A.loo,m Y.NO,OM 29.4481040 31.2661000 ]f,]N,M 11 Y Att Yftt•t aM MW NtlW YplltMntt a.m.. U.8051000 Y,200'ow ]].]NrM 23,079,000 I Y.aM.W ».Nt,OM ».431.040 is Y ]utl Mlae et IFf1dt1 y.M.M 11.01S.M ...AO.M {.81].M 1.061.M ..ON.M N1.M N9.M 16 ......9.... m....v..v. vv.evvv.e.. ..v.avvvv.. ........... I .. ......v0 ..v........ ........... 17 aYgN mail M 1N N0 flo M 190 ]170 11 Y a,We d m&mSt MLLLY odY 277,600 Af."o »a,M Ao,aw Y1,aM 286.340 10 ' U muotos va t w ou.OM,M IU,IU.M 619.986.000 121,Nl,aM Nf,n1,M I40,156,000 Y [ [ . I - [ [ C . [- t- [ - [ - [ -. [ _ [ [ [ [--- [ ( -- eTaYvm[« ewaa�® caex rwv e[w z ' ns[al.YONa 1wo-199a rxvwm 199v-xvoo yaR 1990.91 \wl-R iR]-9] 19n-9. 19w-n a-TW TotLL l99]-]000 lO-Ytit 1a41 L[R (JPlalc tOmiel 4.•3a],PoO a0,a9a,ON I.,a00.000 e6,0]1.000 ]...39,w0 I 41.3I7.00 10,0N1000 91flRN it CY„ta.,ctlm OtN4 ]l],0« 11a.000 313,«0 21 33 9„[, [vn.vtlm i.L0,0« 2,390.w0 i.vN.000 316101. 2.7301O 13.NO,wO 16.001«0 2e,6e0,000 x] S] Nutt[1LL eb4 614.00 )w.M a13.000 9H.0« 1.0141w0 4.140,0« 0,]]a,w0 Si.a66.0w iI Ia eJ.na W.O1tY N04 x•]ft,Ow 449.000 1,2w,000 1.OLL,Ow 631.w0 i 6,646,Ow 6.2b,Ow li.e91,Po0 SB 26 I1,4[vt ) W.4llu0•e lnme a.Ni.Ow a.3N.w0 1,I13r0w ],w.,Ow 1.b3.0w M,e1.,000 Br«lr0w i0.N1rOw N S) 0.[t LNt aO,M,W le.w .Wo ( 155.MIM 66r0wr0w 330.w0,Ow Sl v oury v9...1. ve,wo ve,ow na.sa, v Sp fp[N. p[v dv[ n.au.0w l,lta.ow e2,8N,000 11.611. 0,670.00 I 195.7ae.w0 tw,ut.o00 aw,ae9,w0 zv 30 )1RA4 iv1S1A0Li 3010)v0 v].aN,wa N,a«,w0 llv,vls.0w a6,be.0w H,9w,w0 N6,915,000 1L,Rl,m 341.6N.N0 30 11 310®IP[N -- -- 31 Ia Po.t, 9e Io4R Yot4 TtvtYlt nNt M.M. w..... 3.,033,wo zesee,000 i0,ev,w0 I le e,m,w0 e0,4731000 2R,u9,... 32 33 «atae[ fn\lwilm entR a.ae0.000 a,wo,wo e,1w,00o 6,e00,000 a,ew,w0 I 341w.Ow N.ew.w0 o,no.aw 11 N wet B.rvlu — 1N6 .10u. 00 a.W.Ow 4437Aw n.LLtrOw Od11.w0 31 )s 4[t )ttuv,w aaw. n.ow.Ow ll.w0.wo I R.M.Ow 9.3w,000 3...... Ia Is 30[N a3eD01ST0IN s\,wi,.. 51,n0,w0 R,sev,aw Ie,6a9,000 24,322,000 av,vv,w0 19.Na.wO 30e,531,W u ]l N..rn. 3 C.[ry-w.e m [ut ru[ w,e9a,ow u,No.ow 56,m,000 391030,w0 1o.esa,0w N,Ne,aw u,ON.wo 36,0e,00o 31 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ........... ........... 1e aa.p]. Inlay 9..SJve fn•.•a'tlm ew 42,x0 42,390 ...... 13.640 63.110 N,a'. ae 39 [iu4r o3 s.v Bqul9LLVK Pnallm 0elt. l.ow 1,w0 a,wo a,wo l,ow I'm 19 40 121u0,0w 92,390.000 62,110,0w nslO,Ow R,no.ow RJ10.w0 40 mom nuI M oIH M W. 3 e119190 eulam! N envrclm c\m nal vlm 3 ne ac iH® awo-lvvl mmm Hvv-]ow L1K l9Vo-N lw1-92 109]-9l lnH-9. 1]94-K j ]-Yuf]041 1K1-2w0 1- RfLL LSK 1 e0m]®Is1 1 nl YuuW \ CYR-0V.f ha Wt iW ]N.000 j K9,000 MY•Ow ll 1 GNYµ I 1 w iY 4 Y 12 b S —t \ tll[ollMur[ fI0[ b b OtN[' Ilrs i 41 N ime0 v]vgA 1 N I [5 fvK4 W]SWL[ mmµo K9rw0 K1.w0 19Y.M N I m®3]wv 1 n! lutl Y[irWpLL 1 lntuu[ K.000 I ]O.Ow ]e.M N b huslu' N Gplr.l ][WLt1u ]K.pw N N MAO OV®ITII® KSrOw I ]erOm ]SrOw 19 10 Y[u[vu \ farr/-0[.r w lut rur 1 K6.Ow 236.Ow w na S..t i.u•e 1.i v.[lm 9WlM e.].1r...rt. I µl,om K1.990 ea 12 ]utl 1[luu e[ 11Y11r1t1 H o.......... ............ ............ ............ ............ I ........... ........... ....... v01o1]v1 I Wern. ] Ca[[r-w.r 1[v Wt ]ur µ.Nl.Ow 103.11e.w0 ]\.1H.Ow \9ri9].0w M.f]Y.000 i µ.00l.Ow 39.H\.000 1\.011.Ow w f\ m3W \NKO] 119.76e•00 40.2111. y1.N7.00 N.YN,wO N.H6.Ow ]µ.!µ•Om 433.6µ.w0 011.425.W S\ H 2O3K HµG6] ]®m 170.19v.w0 111.µ9.m0 Y1.K0.000 1K.K1rm0 tµ.L1.000 1 417.µ1.000 471r6µ.m0 073.479.w0 H 36 Mlu. ®[iOOH !]•µl•m ]rµ6.0m ",M, O H.061ro00 I].N*,M I 3H.549.Om 3µ13µ.m0 WI.HS.M 16 03.17e.m0 14.9µ.m0 19.K].000 01.221.0m K.m1.N0 Sv.1 .0N µ.Kl. µ 1e.610.w0 fl \ut Yur'. 0[y M1[ft...]uM1[q Opul[uvr[. 9r3H.Om µANrmO 16r20rm0 li.]µ.Om 13.1101N0 i 24.1uI3.0w K.NIrMmO K.NirOw n0 39 lom B1WIGf H IOV[t7!) b,a93,m 0017N.Ow 73.01.0w lS.3K.Om µr100.m0 N.lµ.Om 26.944.000 µ 0"'. 69 ........... ........... ........... ......vu. ........... I ........... ........... ........... [ - [ -_ [ - [ t E [ - [_ t [ -_ [--- t:: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 _ OF ORANGE COUNTY — PNITATIO V 5 e�t,,plitan Or OAS tb °O.vm T?i O ut w _ w — p S+nce 195A .� �9NGE COUNT BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1990-1991 FISC'�L YEAR =PPEV B88IYBYION DIBYBICY W. 5 6/20/90 80808Y �I088 Page 1 1990-91 YIBCBL Y&1R OIBMM 85 8810168Y BPPPDV® BPP9O9® BBCVOQOD)® OBBC9IPYI08 M BCL7JOBY and BOBOef BOmR BOOOBS 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 98OOI� Operating 8 Capital PagYireeBnts Operating PaW 6,190,000 6,766,000 9,673,000 C truction Fund 15,886,000 x C P1ta1 Yac13it18a Pnotl 19,527,000 • 8,249,000 9,452,000 BOB-Wfn OPBa8YI9O 6 WIM 25,717,000 15,015,000 35,011,000 ---------- ----------- ----------- Mot MCSreeeM BMtl YW Inept 9nme - 1991 55,000 52,000 26,000 Wrn BBpOIBW(mR8 25,772,000 15,067,000 35,037,000 • Mjmp for Inter-POM Srnfsra. CDOBTT BAIRSATZ011 DI0T3lICS m. 5 6/20/90 '� BOA9AT B8CODI�ATIOBO PB 2 1990-91 IIBfAt YBAB DIBTAICf 45 BOIBIADY c APHBO9A9 APPAOpID DBC9BODm® DBBCAIp M OA ACCOOBT TSSLB B®fA3T BmfAT BODLET 19BH9 1989-90 1990-91 TD10)IBO Op tiw A CByltBl Mtlim CW A Imu[Bmta (Aypxopriattl NBBryM BrN tarry-Over) 11,100,000 B.KB,000 6,391,000 m OtM[ RBvnBs 12,262,000 1 4,2n,000 26,063,000 t O cl"tal TBm Alloutim Fran 1% L { 2,155,000 2.325,000 2,s46,000 6DB-SOlAL OPmU G A CAprm 23.717,000 15,016,000 35,004,000 DBEL BBtir�t CJpA A IiNYtJtlt! (AWroprlp RBBBivu A Carry- ) 31,0m 20,000 33,000 Otlrr PavanlB 2,000 2,000 m 1l♦palt B41/tl by Ta for DBEs ®110at1m 22,000 30,000 �- 8OB-10[AL D®T RKTIAB1®R 35,000 52,000 33,000 "n TO M n,n2,00B n,067,000 35,037,000 +Ad39 for mtax�nma yranem m Td Comty L prBBAnt3y i p..dt 9 tauB In aor r m p Uft a dLspK.a o BBBBABBd 9a Uorh. Ta iww u �, of 3 30 BBomt Co $51,282. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 Page 1 v BUDGET 10=200NIMTIONS 6/20/90 1990-91 Eiseal Year Ye BOND as OPEMTIMO ESTIMATED mm APPAOVED APPPWED ACTUAL AYCWODM DESCRIPTION OR ACD ONT TITLE BUDGET BU0= BEPEEDIrORED BUDOST i 1988-89 1969-90 1969-90 1990-91 OPERATING Directors- Pees 6,300 6,300 9,400 10,000 r Contractual Service Sbeie of Joint Operating 2,104,000 2,026,000 1,856,600 2,376,000 w Trunk Mainteneves 175,000 175,000 21,500 175,000 Pump Station 273,000 275,000 201,50Y 250,000 Ncnnole Lire a get Nall Repair 25,000 r, Permit and Ind.Nete Admin. 25,000 20,000 31,000 33,000 Connection, Too Admin. 28,800 34,300 13,700 17,000 BoM Collection Expmoe ISO 100 100 Lao Tamp" Collection Bapanw 6,900 8,700 8,400 9,700 me Treawrer'e Investment Adm. A Smoking Pas 15,000 7,500 5,300 9,200I Utilities 90,000 110,000 94,am 304,000 User Pee Mgense 10,000 42,000 10,000 41,800I y Profaeiorel Services 10,000 5,600 0,900 5,000 Printing And Publication 1,000 1,000 2,900 3,000 mw Travel A Meeting - Diracten 200 300 200 200 r✓ Ontolleetibla Accounts 1,300 1,000 1,000 TOTAL OPERATING 2,748,700 2,713,000 2,269,500 3,061,000 Vr NON-OPERATING Interest 300 0 V1 Erpanmee Applicable to Prior Teem 3,000 3,000 1,000 I ' TOTAL NWT-OPRRATIM 3,300 3,000 0 1,000 TOTAL MOUNTING A ALCM-OPSMTIMO 2,752,000 2,716,000 2,269,500 3,062,000 ABBERYBB � Approprlatimn for Contingencies 2,062,000 2,692.000 9,080,000 Authorized General Raeerve 1,376,000 1,358,000 1,531,000 w TOTAL 9ESEDYEB 3,436,000 4,050,000 0 6,611,000 1 u TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 6,190,000 6,766,000 2,269,500 9,673,000 000MTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 9 Page 2 BUDGET REOOMMENDATIONS 6/20/90 ry 1990-91 yiaral Year POND 49 CPE9ATIN0 m ESTIMATED APPINIVBD APPAOVBD ACTUAL PEO3MMENDHD DESCAIpriam UR ACCOOAS TITLE BOOM BUDGET ManUlDITOAEB BODG6T ae 19B8-89 1989-90 1989-90 1990-91 AVAILABLN YMM r � A nrveatmrca (Appreprieted 9aeervee afld Carry-over( 3,667,000 3,426,000 3,573,700 5,121,000 r 8aea 40,000 101,000 18,900 20,000 yr Umr Pees 0 649,000 624,000 1,370,000 Intareat A Nice. 9 mipts 292,000 265,000 374,100 416,000 v Delinquent Tams 76,000 116,000 163,500 163,000 80B-TOTAL 368,000 1,131,000 1,160,100 2,169,000 Tm Alle tien 2,101,000 2,163,000 2,143,800 2,337,000 r 8ubv nui 84,000 47,000 90,000 46,000 80B-TOTAL 2,133,000 2,209,000 2,193,800 2,3B3,000 TOTAL AVAILABLE PO9DIN0 6,190,000 6,766,OOOL 6,947,600 9,673,000 ea r CODNTy SANITATION DISTRICT NO.5 Page 1 1 BUDGET RECOMHENDATI0N0 6/20/90 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR r POND 95 CAPITAL FACILITIES ES2'IHATED I ' r APPROVED APPPDV® ACTUAL ABCOIODflaDeD DESCBSPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BODGES MOST MWMITORES BOOM 198E-69 1989-90 1989-90 1990-91 PROJECTS AND 93MMITURM it Treetoant Plant Expansion 4,969,000 5,260,000 3,174,000 4,964,000 y Appropriation for Naotar-Plannod Treatnant plant Facilities 1,698,oao Radio LSNXed Talsestry Systm 50,000 Is+ Neater plan/EIR Update 25,000 bw Improvement. to Bay Bridgo Pu Station 20,000 800,000 105,000 800,000 Rohebilitate Lido and PCN Porte Na1no, 1 Lido Form Hein to Valve "B" 5-26 r✓ Bitter Point, Rocky Point A Carona Del 14er Pump Station Ivpravemmnte 450,000 u Coast Trunk Force Main Newport Blvd. to Back Bey and 1 I Seem Ana River to Bitter Point IJ Pump Station, 5-29 6,200,000 Bitter Point Pimp Station to Havport Blvd., 5-31 100,000 150,000 24,000 Bitter Point find Rocky Point Pump Station Improvements, 5-32 10,000 250,000 25,000 Improvements to Baysida Drive aaI Trunk Bever, 5-34-1,2,3 4,800,000 500,000 1,838,000 250,000 Bauch Coast Tnmk Bawer, Corona Del Nar I P.B. to Ciyetal Cove P.9., 5-35 2,268,000 858,000 159,000 1,000,000 ICI Cryetel Cove Pump Station, 5-36 350,000 50,000 45,000 50,000 i 1 R¢habilitate Balboa Peninsula Trunk, 4eo Lido Pump to "A" Street, 5-20-1 100,000 50,000 1 'Joint No[ka Equity Purchase 3,000 y Earthquake/Flood Daoaga Reserve 209,000 236,000 240,000 Cameo Shores Pump station and E orsion of City Saver to State Park YJ Reimburasaant Agreements Payable I Appropriation for District Facilities V Improvements ant ENpeasion 225,000 ]5,000 151,000 SfyIAI,'RHOOIPL¢N'1'9 11,32T,000 8,249,000 5,521,000 1,11271101 VI m COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT M.5 Pm 2 BODONT RECWDMENDATIONS 6/20/90 ® 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR FOND 45 CAPITAL FACILITIES m ESTIMATED APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL AECOMI�IIDID r. DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BODG8T BUDGET EEFSNDITUN88 BUDGET 1988-99 1989-90 1989-90 1990-91 m AVAILABAE FUNDING Caen A Investments (Appropriated ReenrVas and m Carry-over) 7,633,000 5,039,000 4,265,500 1,274,000 Transfer fr'DO construction Funds 4,964,000 m Construction Grants 144,000 141,000 106,000 48,000 Connection Pass 6,641,000 686,000 273,000 342,000 ey Industrial Waste Fear 6,000 15,000 3,000 4,000 Supplemental User Pees 662,000 300,000 481,000 r Bale of Capacity Rights 247,000 240,000 33,000 510,000 1 Joint Works Equity Sale 772,000 705,000 835,000 m Nuance in Aid of CautrvetSnn, IAIID 3,650,000 650,000 1,350,000 Intermt A Mix. Receipts $44,000 206,000 364,000 218,000 90B-TOTAL SS,S94,000 3,310,000 2,045r000 8,171,000 Trmfer from Bend Fund 7,000 s TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 19,527,000 8,249,000 6,310,500 9,452,000 r m e m m W r CoO S ITATIOM DISTRICT NO. 5 6/20/90 r BOD08T RECOD®IDATIONs 1990-91 FIsc YEAR r POND e5 MHEIMDLTION PONO/1990 r esrxfureD APPAOl7� APPR(IV® A=n RECO1BOO w DEBCRIPTION OR ACCOON2 TITLE BODOET BODGES ELPENDITOPBs BOD0H2 1988-89 1989-90 1989-90 1990-91 r PRO cm AND BE PPtN)ITORNs r rrar fer to Capital Facilities 4,964,000 Debt ieeuonce Coot 4 Rseerwe 3,000,000 Reserve for Nester Pleas Prol.cte 12,886,000 r TOTAL REOpIRQ@NTs 0 0 0 20,850,000 AVAILABLE PONDINO V CaeN erW Imoatmente (Appropriated Ra.e es end � I Carry-ovsr) y Ps.c6 from Borrowing 20,000,000 Id Ifterost A Mo.. Receipt. 850,000 ki V sm-TOTAL 0 0 0 20,850,000 TOTAL AVAILABLE POMDIMO 0 0 0 20,850,000 1� II bw I � V L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO, 5 a BUDGET RECOMIgNDATIONS 6120190 1990-91 Fiscal YEAR POND /5 BOND AND INTEFBST - 1951 a ESTIMATED APPNIIVBD APPRDV® ACTUAL RECODDOIDED DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUD08i EXPENDITURES BUDGET a 1988-89 L989-90 1989-90 1990-91 - BOND RETIRE @ AND INTEREST a Principal an Honda 25,000 25,000 25,801 26,000 e Interest on Bands 1,046 1,059 801 35B Transfer to Capital Facilities 6,642 a TOTAL 26,746 26,059 26,602 33,000 ,c APHORIZED GENERAL RESERVE 28,254 25,941 - - TOTAL RECOI�s 52,000 33,000 AVAILABLE FUNDING - - Cash 6 Im .tmonts (Appropriated Reservae and re Carry-over) 31,000 20,000 27,756 33,000 m Delis oat Taxes 2,000 Interest X Mac. Receipts 2,000 2,000 1,149 a SOB-TOTAL 2,000 4,000 1,149 0 AMOUNT TO BE MIS= BY TAXES 22,000 28,000 29,591 m TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 55,000 52,000 SB,496 33,000 an Outstanding G.O. Bonds A 6130/91: 90 Final Payasnt Date: Auguat, 1990 bd w NmRa Wrt{n0S oImIQ w.t 6q0/20 wSIDOY Or oIMILT wu=.. SISLatl PWa0a9 j fwRtf MAL C,LP. 1920-21 1391-81 son-03 Ina'" Iwt-w I S-Lev Tebl 1015-3000 1".v Teal .._....... — -----_-- ---------- _...._._. ( _________ _________ _____________ t t Ny sutlm bOtevreb i t 1.e1tbr romt eY Yv3Y robs Paps, I t a.. 1.Ptp.Satb. S-a] uM n{,w0 23.0441 no,Ow 20.00 250.000 a.v at., wb St., etl L1m I•q I I .bttw tmpo pp nt. OI 300.00 I i { 000rew 300.w0 a. Sala —I. to YY StW. Pq Sbstb, S-aa lal 1.105,w0 1 103,w0 sw.ew w0,0w 1,60e100 1,00.00 t.C.abe YI Yt l.brb Pq I I east. Igbtp•sb, 3-40 12) •• 3w,Ow 1 30.004, aoo.w0 100,000 i L.I..liltt.tp S.1{e. tMsbwb 2 (3) b O I Llsy b '1• Btew -0 tr S-S1 (31 lw•0w i ]O,ow ]Oo,wO I 300•000 30.000 I.Pt..S..sb to S.Y.tM p Sa A (2) t xtl fer. l- -l.i.l 3)(31]) LSw.000 1.05.000 l{O.wO LJOP,Iw 6w0.Ow 1 3.130,000 3p50,000 I Mt Caet 810—Y OnrBY I xtwl taOJfllbtlw (3) • t.lw.we iw.wo 1.3001004 3,m.Ow 1 4.4w.0w 4.00.000 I ' St] mpe PW uNOltiveJm lal 1.60.000 1 0 l,aw,wo I,w0,00o I Sbb Iu u.a ulL.t.t 1 t l,{Is•all,eo0 Ieb et.13-0l xawb• 4.011,60 11,w0 i.)w.aw 1,250,000 I,0e0,000 5,000,Ow bub Cant xrw! Sal "I P.{. 1 t b Ct LL DID.yet .a.. {.r 5-36 (1)(2) •• ].]SS,Ow { lOs.00o 1.00,00 2.00.00 300.Ow 3.300,000 3.200.000 <rY.wl uw IrY .tales, la• I31 •• 1,01e,000 46.040 w.Ow fw,00 500.040 1 1.030,000 1.050.000, Mlselle..ewn ryoJwt. t60.Ow 1 .......... ..OW a5•ow 13.Ow a3,Ow ----w b3.w0 ------o 1w.000 CStMO iOrLL 33.71S.000 3,]3{.w0 S,373.w0 t,laS.Ow 3,213.w0 1.215.000 3.019.00 11,123.000 2,115.000 21.540.0w .•....... 1 .......... .......... ...•...... .......... ......•••. ...•..... •......... ........... ........... 1. Ilbtee-plemtl feallltlb Pn.rotlY p0.r bmttmtlm 3. Nbwr-OI.uM fwlltsb. —Ill•eMe. Mttp 3. XuI.,tarstM 4a1111t.. .a0Ma1N at. Iat— Mlp/awtrveabe • P.ttl.11Y Said W District bd .. P.m w Ilw i3 rt ' 1 <fl01S9 N9[53310. OI]SBIR IJ. ! 6I30/90 _' _ RSa6Li R PiV]LT6D 1J®1 ISOJ PM i -� S1NJ4 ii]9B 1990-1991 SI®0a1 1999-]000 • t 6]33 IIYO-91 1991-]i 1991-9] 199H1 ip4]0 i 0-irs Sefal 1W6-]p0 10.irs Topl Lm I .. t 09dAmD .DID) . t l 9ausY 1 Cu[y-On[ 9[a Wt 996[ 1,331,000 6.611.000 6.033.000 fr]prODO e,sR.OM l.li1r000 1.61].Op 1.131.000 1 91YYR i epl6 ei It ru 6llxatlm ].SM,M 3,910.000 3.970,M0 3.1p,000 3.Ma.ow M.9a9.OM 2119SOrp0 w'w'.M i ] 16al. SYW19Ll Sub fo'm 33,m 19,M0 201000 i0.0oo lu.D00 no'm 6M,OW 3 6 pu br 1.e70.000 2.11L.M ]aM.oW 3.331.000 3.9]5.000 13,134.000 3D.3791000 44.113.000 6 . .i a Snbari a � m� Y6.Op 467100) M9.a00 to"M0 ]]S.ODO irffL'm 1.e03.wo 3"... e .,� 6 Dept RWMo s f 3 1o31L 01900 1.131.000 e.393.000 ""I'm 7' M.o00 ].e1].000 I 30.961.000 e9.M]pM Mdm.. 1 1 a 911P4]9ll POOD139 9.6]]r000 12.0061OM 12.94"OM U'lls'm 13.656.000 I 36.043.000 69r211r000 90.Mi.OM a 1 �� 9 Y[a a! iofeR 9.tY tl a 0 2r276.000 Srl]Sr. S,M].OM ]r]69.m 3r759rOM 141910.000 M.itl.OM Mr116,000 1 i 10 cello L CPaip a 1 0 m0 Dept Opt. 656.0M 720.000 156.00 396.OM m'MO 3.190.000 6,01.m 3.631.OM 10 11 MA, p tof 2.000.000 ],)10.000 3.500.000 6.360.vM f3.50,OM 2e1000.00 37.5M.MO 11 11 ]0114 ]ID®INHf• 3.M3,OM a.6R,000 6.369.00D i.M].Op a.a6].000 I 31,169r0M M.9A.0M 90.391.000 13 i 1 If Yum/ a ptt3-0.t u YK iMs 6.611.m 91633.M0 1.399.000 5.943.000 6,8UrMO 1.633.000 136.000 236.000 I] 11 aut Toot'. 0[9 I`ws"M61n9 9Nui®0. lr!]I.Op 2.736,000 ].SiI.MO 3.363.000 6r611.000 6.133,OM 61e58.000 6.6Y.000 l6 -1 3! SW WWc^at epffgt) ........ ......... ......M0 ..ON.... ....... I ....OM ......... .......MM 1! ..ww..... ..........v v......v... v.vv....w. .......eves 1 .........v ....vvv.we vwvw.vw. i 16 aYgY SWl] Volt Su 635 375 $95 4110 il]! a]M 16 la NO.t of 9Wtv.Lut Gwllleq Y13u L.IM U,aM 'tl.600 m.p0 M.LO H.9M ii li 4tiof tl a. 1. 11.570.. 02.293.OM S].]M.. 13.131.p0 Mr9]6.OM 19.636.000 If t- t- C- ovar eu\tenv oxemlti fo. a 6/b/b aammr v lvvaam� aav v.o. ] rtovr, y1\9e Yfo-anl naoow a9w-]am ],q{ 1990-91 IM-91 a91]-9] lvv]-vf 1296-v] f-1Y[ SOtSI IM-bN 10-1Ne low L]O ovam I®lel 1 11 WYfw 14[[3-owt hm Wt ]Ys I.274.000 L.H9.000 1.2e0.000 1.252.000 I.W.000 i lr27].000 1r913.000 l.flf.0b L 1391101 t 20 WWet]m 9t.nY Y.OW i Y,YO N.WO SO ]t I., GOR�vt\m b]•000 309.000 ]]],OW ]N•000 416.009 I t.9SO M 3,{11.000 f,]N.OW ]t li ]a\st.lLL YW I'm 0.000 6.0N 7.009 \.ON 1 b.OW 61.. 91.000 ]] IS OYs IW IS b YL Of O P—w 1IOS . II0.000 69,000 116.000 YOr000 90.000 I 1.020.000 SOO.. 1""'. H SS I'M,. i.0m.000 ]Y•000 1 4.4e0.. 614501. i0 T InY...t \ WulW,.m. I,v>•. 1,ON,000 b1.000 On.000 347.000 NS,000 I ].Ob.M 1.]b.000 9.\60r000 S] b W.. fM Avt NN ],NO t SO 21 O.Ot xwI' - 50.000.000 10,000.000 30.000.000 I N.OW,000 00.000.000 ]o 31 TR]L 9SVa0Z a.0a0000 3•S16r000 4r067 •Y0 f10rN0 10.961.OW ; N•]Y.000 0.)04•000 Y.Oa•0a S1 ]S fOIY. l9]IOWi O®b0 A.]]s.OW 13.311.000 17.sa.000 s•ta.a0 11.676.000 i a,N].Oa 30.)1].000 6].63).YO ]] I b 1m®ata9m i as b eWaf .f Jo1rt Ib[s6 T)6.ti]Plmt 6.f4.OW 6.0a. 00 0.as,000 6.601.000 S.1Y.000 I ]s.b]. ].a b 6.000 b.1N.N0 30 OYitla] ColLeilm ef.t,. 0,>70r000 1.150.6 %00 2.276.0 1.215,000 1,07 ]I 6.000 I 1f.1 .MNO 2.310.000 ar .00O a9m SS M000 ]f W10Ym�n! 1T9�,t N)�t. 1 . i Ia.NO .000 S6 ]) 1.000.000 ].]00.0% 2,300.000 7,000.000 1.000.000 9.000.p00 ]) b 11.339.M a,0000000 10.sa.a0 O,S77,Om s.Sa.000 52.t11.000 11rN9.000 63,106,000 b 33 9r.rvY \ GY.l-w.t fn M.t )rs 1119a.000 1,209.000 ).b].OW ],0]0.000 "VISION 1 9.vN.000 6.Oa.000 6,a1.N0 20 ............ ............ ............ ........... ............ I . ......... ........... ........... 60 slgL IWly S—IO faActlm IY 021280 0].]a 921010 02.1N 02.]]0 a.lN 60 61 Iu\O.) o) M lkrII ]e•,t Pn Il 0„14 ISO 100 a0 a. 00 ISO 6l N ft..�m 1. L,cv. a62.000 s]a•000 0377,000 1396.000 0416,000 ]0]1.000 a I i 1 � tmir IUliU10• we]vcs m. s s/w1N auxEvvr 99 DpU6LL7.7m Nm no9 wpt ] ' nw] iuia two-awt mmm aw9-:oo0 i]p ipY0.91 lwl-!i twi-p] lw]-OL Up1-9! 6-iNt )efl U343aN 1D-i.v )041 Olfi S® MUM �- i N Ulm Y I 45 Sf9Yd• I N )YY ) N 6l EI)LL tOFY03 t fl Y SVYY ]V]1Lio72 )®IIO U.000 t L).900 Ur0-- Y I �itfl® 6D Svtl p[Yr.'aW f irt6tit ]6•NO 1 if,OW Hr0a0 N !0 S[Ysi6 tO Nplfl ]tCl3tlr 1,000 1 !0 v,oro v,oeo n.an u x Da.+vu 6 .attT-Ont to Yrt l.+[ 1,009 1,00D U v N[t i.. .. 1.000 1,N0 U x 61M s.1NY u IM1ficltl 0 0 s e6 6010YU j 65 W..evs ] 1'vi}-O.+r 9.a Wt r..s 6.4v.009 0.610.0U 1.60.M "."I'm 6,]U.000 I ".U.M N.""m 6.6v,Ow Sa x )fR]L YpYU U.¢a¢.o00 6.)U.NO U.)Y.NO ).91).M U.771.000 I n.la9,w0 N,"5,w0 U1.9]a.000 6f !l LO]]L 991)YLL[ 9®UO U,ON.oOo IO n,]LI. U.an.Ow U,aU.Ow ]]rUi.Ow U.n0r000 74.M,M lUn9.]Y• al U.636.W0 U.x).M w0 U.SI].Ow UrSN.000 11.U6.OW n.Y1,000 .NI.wO U4. rM000 U !D D...M. ] CURA•tt d Mat iwt U.610.000 1.010.M U.NI.M 6.3"'M 16.166,000 I 14.166.000 "M'M 6rU6.0a0 69 60 M.t iur•f 0c1' Mt1W MWnp @pWirMb 1.U1,N0 i,lU.M 3•115.w0 ]•)62•w0 6.6i].o00 6,6U•0w IAA. w f.xe,000 60 ¢a 10d MUM M (®icls) 17,w9.900 5.04000 a MI. 4,516.M 10,346,M 1 10,331,000 I2,v6•ww 1x,]9a.owl LL ........... ........... ........... .......... ........... 1 ........... ........... ........... t, t7 t- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY PNjTATIO,V �etaVolitan Or q VISA nee 1954 J ra o n m - K o�9NGE COVN�,I BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS I 1990-1991 FISCAL YEAR r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 6/20/90 BUDGET RBCORNMEDATIONS pup 1 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR r DISTRICT 66 SONNARY APPPOv® APFROVBD ABCOIGOUID® DEBCRIpTSON OR ACCOUNT TITLE BODOBT B0008T BUDGET 1960-89 1989-90 1990-91 . REQUSBMITS Operating A Capital Requirements Operating Fund 3,780,000 5,552,000 7,768,000 r Cenutevetden Fold 91988,000 Capital Facilities Fund 6,304,000 * 8,826,000 10,260,000 r ----------- ----------- ----------- TOTAL F UOXPIKK SB 12,064,000 14,378,000 28,016,000 r FUNDING _ Operating A Capital Funding ------------------------ r Cash 6 Investments (Appropriated Reserves and Carry-Ovar) 7,810,000 9,267,000 6,924,000 Other Revenue 3,164,000 • 3,083,000 19,669,000 Anticipated Tax Allocation r from It Lavy 1,110,000 1,228,000 1,423,000 -__----- ----------- -------_- TOTAL FUNDING 12,004,000 14,378,000 28,016,000 r vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv=vvv- =evvvvv vv r *Adjusted for Inter-Pod TruuNrs - The County is presently SRpmmding taxes in connection with a dispute over r aesesead valuation. Taxes impounded as . _ of Jgu 30M amount to 637,403. r r CODNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 110. 6 Page I BODGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/20/90 1990-91 Fiscal Year I FUND 16 OPERATING V L6TINNTlD 1 I APl181P® AFFRAY® ACTOAL MCO"N9106D 1 Ov DESCRIPTION OR ACCOONT TITLE 1 Boom SOD= :EEPOWITORES BOD08T 1 Igoe-as ! 1909-90 i 1969-90 i 1990-91 I r 1 OPERATING 1 I r , bw I 1 Director.' Pees I 7,500! 7,5001 6,900I ! 7,500 i ! 1 ; li Contractwl Services ! Share of Joint Operating I 2,080 cool 2,587,000� 2,151,600 2,670,000 Trunk Maintazbnee :0:000, 40,0001 27,900, 40,000. } 1 Harbole Ling A Nat Nall Repair ! 15,000 Pump Station Neintenanc. ; 25,0001 35,0001 20,900' 25,000: Psrm6t and Ind.gaste Admin. ' 30,000� 35,000� 22,700. 25,000; Connection Pee Admin. 12,5001 39,100! 23,7001 11,400, r, Bond Collection Expe. ! 100! 100! 1 Tax/Pae Collection Expense i 6,9001 6,300: 8,300! 9,000 1 Trsasur.r's Investment Adm. A Banking Pass 8,000! 41600; 5,000: 8,600. IE0 Otilltiea � 10,8001 19,0001 12,400! � 19,300. 1 I 1 1 i User Pee E!!Pencs 1 12,000! 50,000. 12,1001 53,000' Professional Services 5,000, 5,000' 10,90W 5,000' I ! Printing And Publication 1,000 1,000 700 1,000 lad! Travel A Heating - Directors 200, 200' loom 200, ' ! Oneolleetible Recounts 1,0004 1,000 100• I'M VI TOTAL OPERATING 21220,000. 2,833,000. 2,304,000 _2,900,000. 'I NON-OPERATT.4C J u Interest 50,000` 54,700 121,000 Expenses Applicable to Prior Years l 3,000i 3,000' 8,900_' 3,CC0' TOTAL HON-OPERATING 3,000i 53,000' 8,900' 1:4,000 ll TOTAL OPERATING 3 HON-OPERATING 212231000! 2,886,000� 2,312,900' 3.024,000 bw RESERVES II Appropriation for Contingencies 445,000: 1,223,000. 3,232,000 y Autborized Caneral Reserve 1,112,000; 1,443,000• 1,5121000. TOTAL RESERVES 1,557,000, 2,666,000: 0. 4,744,000 VI TOTAL REODIREIDNTS ! 3,750,000! 5,582,0001 2,312,900: 7,768,000: Y.1 I � V II lad COMITY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 Page 2 - BUDGET RECOsUCENDATIONS 6/20/90 1990-91 Fiscal Year run 66 OPERATING r E rnur, APPROVED I APPROVED ACTUAL i RECWMENDED DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BMW EEpBuDITURES BUDGET ,r ( 1966-89 1989-90 I 1989-90 ! 1990-91 AVAILABLE FUNDING I 1 1 Cash 6 Investments (Appropriated Reserves and Carry-Over) 1,580,0001 1,969,000j 2,101,000, _ 3,369,000, Fees I 139,0001 114,000� 142,800. 163,000- I User Fees 800,0001 2,077,000i 2,085,100' 2,525,000: I � IMeraet 6 Mdee. Receipts 111,0001 164,0001 207,800i 288,0001 Dalim9uent taxes 40r000 61,000� 93,200. 91,000 SUB-TOTAL j 1,090,000j 2,416,000j 2,528,900: 3,06710001 Tax Allocation I 11081,0001 1,142,000: 1,209,400 1,306,000. d Subventions L 29,0001 25,0001 28,200i 26,000, PUB-TOTAL I 1,110,0001 1,167,0001 1,3J7,500. 1,332,000 nd TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 3,780,000; 5,352,000: 5,867,500. 7,768,000- es m m Ir COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT N0.6 Page 1 BUDGET RECONNENDATIONS 6120/90 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR FUND 46 CAPITAL FACILITIES 1 1 j esTIMA'TED i APPR7M APPROVED j ACTUAL j RECMRMKND 81 i DESCRIPTION OR ACCODNT TITLE BUD= BODOET EIPENDITUREB I B000ET j lel 1988-89 1989-90 1 1989-90 1990-91 I PROJECTS AND EIPENDITDRES 1 Treatment Plant Empanuion 4,711,000 4,962,000 2,995,000 I 5,512,000 I Appropriation for Master-Planned Treatment Plant Facilities 1 Nester Plan/EIR Update 40,000 I I ! 1 b fRadio Linked Telemetry System 30,000 1 Coast Trunk Farce Maine Newport Blvd. to Beck Ray and Santa Ana River to Bitter Point Fuup Station, 5-29 368,000 I I k/ Bitter Point Pump Station I 1 I to Newport Blvd., 5-31 I 90,000 10,000 I 1,000 I I 1 Bitter Paint and Rocky Point Pub Station Improvesents, 5-32 25,000 I 200,000 I 9,000 I i 200,000 1 Yr I ! I I Baker-Gisler Interceptor 14-1-1 (A!(B) 11337,000 2,000,000 21,000 I 1,350,000 ew .I I I i u Fairvi Relief, Baker Street to Wilson Street, 6-12 1,491,000 327,000 I - ' I 100,000 1 i i I ti Santa Ana River Siphon I 900,000 I Joint Works Equity Purchase 585,000 I 627,000 ' I 1,346,000 y EarthgR s/Flood Damage Reserve 199,000 242,000 1 j j I 267,000 I I j Appropriation for District Facilities Impxavemante and Expansion 1 33,000 I 500,000 I 4I,000 i I 585,000 ! I! y! . TOTAL AEp0I10➢RBTB 1 8,304,000 i 8,826,000 1 1,700,000 I 10,260,000 ! L I J COONTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.6 Page 2 HUDGET RECOMNBNDATIONS 6/20190 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR POND 86 CAPITAL FACILITIES _ �Zm APPROVED APPRUM ACTum I EECCE SER D I s DESCRIPTION ON ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET I SODur E2PM=29= I BUDGET I 198E-89 1989-90 1909-90 1990-91 j vm AVAILABLE FUNDING I I I I I 1 Cash A Investments I I ,m (Appropriated Reserves and I Carry-over) 6,230,000 7,290,000 6,732,600 i _ T[aiuiar from.Construction Twat i � � 3,512,000 _. Construction Grants 136,000 I 133,000 1 100,000 I I 53,000 rr Connection Peas I 250,000 I 782,000 j 474,000 228,000 Industrial NasLa Paee 60,000 I 50,000 61,000 70,000 ' v O80C Pfis6 534,000 j I 13,000 � , I Sale of Capacity Rights 242,000 I 226,000 38,000 I I 567,000 I I r Joint Works Equity Sale 54a,000 I +I y, IntereaY and Mac. Receipts 304,000 377,000 ' 577,000 273,000 1 SOB-TOTAL 1,074,000 1,128,000 1,219,000 6,708,000 re I TOTAL AVAILABLE PUIIDING I B,304,000 0,038,000 I 7,973,600 I 1 10,280,000 I r ed 1 � r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 6/20190 VI BUOGET RSCONISBPDATIONS 1990-91 PI9CAL YEAR POND 06 CONSTRUCTION POND/1990 ESTINATED APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL RECOIDUUM® DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET F3PE10lITORES BODOET 1 1988-89 1989-90 1989-90 1990-91 PROJECTS AND 81PENDITORE9 Transfer to Construction Fi 5,512,000 su Debt Isance Cost 2,250,000 y Reserve for Heater Plan Projects 7,738,000 r NUB-TOTAL 0 D 0 19,900,000 COP Installment Payments TOTAL REQUIRRNENT9 0 0 0 15.900,000 ! , AVAILABLE FUNDING Da9b az,d Investments ( J (Appropriated Reserves and Carry-over) 1, I V Proceeds from 1990 Barroving I 19,000,000 (I r Interest 8 Mac. Aeceip�e I 500,000 Transfer from Capital Facilities Fund 1 � r � I SUB-TOTAL D D D I ! 15,500,000 ' I � �I r TAANBPER FOR INSTALLHECT PAYMENTS 1 COP Payment Transfer from Capital Fund 1 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 0 0 0 15,500,000 1 Y� V 4 mcall SWITIn011 Dlanm m.s 6I20290 2®uu or olens02 eou.wi2w sisin roaam two" M. I C.I.F. 1,10-21 1991-82 1222-e3 roes-a IM-a3 s-Tote Total 1915-20,10 10-rate Tam ----------- I ___________ ____—----- ___----- ___________ _--------- ___________ ___________ ___________-_ Strict runt cod 2aa2r mi0t Paso I emgw I•ptvrwwa, 5-32 12)• 3.9.0m e,00 200.000 I 200.0m Marc ' I bNblllt.t. Nast coast tle0wr I i Gravity 2..ar la) • 1.30.1000 1 50,000 000.000 401S.0110 1,050,000 4so,000 1.5001Om uee.as }amnia uNatllasum (a) 2,225,000 I 25,000 23,D00 3.200,000 2,1n,000 rt.raialas mt.m.SoOe, Ha-1 Ill(2).• 1.454,000 102,000 ee0,00 sm,0oo a,uo,GDo s,ao,000 I t aana dam urw 511asss: 11215-31),sad Is" st.15-3al TewM• 908,000 1 e,000 00.000 300.m0 t e001000 mo,m M1lnbn R411.1. Strata ivies atewt tou Suaa x aw (eas) (a> :,910,000 1 108,000 420.000 sx0.om :,ae,oeo 2,no.Gm District Me.B Trove hnllrl (]) 1.600.000 { 0 1.000,000 1,000,000 Nlecrllwwm xmJwte 50.000 SG,000 $0.0.0 50.000 $0,000 $0.000 1 230,000 ra0,ow 500.000 _ _ _ _ __ 04Na MAX 11,364.000 1 11e.000 1.800,000 850.000 123,000 060,000 620.000 112n.00D 6,930.000 11.245.000 .......... : .....a.. ..........• ......... •........ ......... ......... ....u•.... ........... ...........• 1. IWbrvllwwi facilities prnawtb w0•r construction 2. Nral.r-Oacca t Statistics Sa.emuy males G..Im a. Nt6crvplmmad facilities amwuted for Islas. nmimlmmaanutiw • r.ru•uy Said b District a •• partially Sold al D1e111.Ic T tam if ., W®ii Me2i1y0• o2eHlI.T p. s f/HIN eLiCmf Ot NNiL1lD fJg1 afpl P.p.1 aIYa4 ia]p0 1ppY1H1 71� iHf-]Ow Li0 IM-pt ]H1-02 LO]-H 1Ha-H 1pphpe 1 6-iava low 1995-2000 10-v. low Lm OOMIiIN rafn I 1 Wwsw a 4eR-0M[ rau [W irr ].]fp.000 4.744.000 a.aea.000 4.936.ON f.Oy.Ow I 2.311.000 4.e0.000 a.]{a.Ow 1 aapOH ] abn or 1] iu fllxaum 1,4y,w0 1.W.000 2.Ml. 1,713,000 1.pu.Ow i a.uf.000 12,]{1,000 wrfy.00D f a rW, w Itl a..M w.000 M,W W.. a{l.aw fN.0o0 1 1.oM.o00 2.204.000 3.300.e00 a a OMi IW 2,0yr000 312001000 J,M.ow 4,620r000 5.eM.000 1 y.yar0w N.fu.b0 ..."I'M f s a¢baMs f NglLMva ao's aN,aw ab,000 347,000 346•000 avow t 1.654.000 3.4 ).0w 4101.ew v a OtMr Mpa� t f 1 101300FYOt 4.3H.000 e.ON.Ow e.p10.000 11006rw0 6.1Hr000 I 30.479.000 {].OurOw f),aNrOw l 0 lOilL 111IIJ0Y r®Il0 1.1N.000 0r198.000 10.160.000 11.132,000 u.N1.f00 I ]].801.000 N.ON.wO 97.H1.000 0 ®®aawN I I e . M Jea. Fufp a I. a a,670.M M.M a,w2,000 3,194.000 Lbe,Ow 0,m,M 1 I,MU.M,M 2,uo.. 4.N0,000 a +0 M�Lctam eHpa•N f o et aeMr Op.. aN,Ow W.0f0 =,aw 2u•000 Na,000 t +,M,m a,No,000 a,no•000 N u o.e] '_av]M a,eop.oee a,aw,ow a,aW,wp a,lw,wo t N,eof,aw v,Hf,wp 33,000.000 It . 1 12 -mu ntvyfamm a.m.000 11043.000 e.w.aw f.N6aw a.M.aw I U.... y.ua.aw y.up.aoe IS It MM[TM f to O at iM[ 2.1bw Y b000.O {.000.0v0 2.pH.M a.e ,000 a.e , 1 {•OMw It N.aN.000 u.]N,OW u eae T... ,r.pay rrtoM Mef rr..fl.r a>,yfer.M t.sy w,000 a.{la,o a.OW,Opp 3.945,000 2.10f.aW 1 4.2061000 61791.000 f,lu.OW 12 le ]Mu4t] ..ya.OW .......W ......... ..2N.... y2.... I ..JJ,... ..2y.. ... . ....OW IS 16 e4p2. rW1y fufJno arr rx ]fe ]af 2N 0. µw iiae u 11 OUMr a! Mi .lit W12 OLLt. b.pW b.uW M.m N.]W N•aw N.eW 11 IS 4tluttl O..t vW ...ye.OW N.wol000 N,eMIM a.Am000 "'SHIM 910.y01M L r r [ r r [ [ [ C: [- [ C [ [ [ [ r [ [ 1 G 9 1 1 1 fl 6 1 9 1 1 1 1 1 E 1 1 G Ca09]) UUUL O30[YIM W. 6 {liaa90 6)mKIU w ON6CTm -- noI "O TURB 19+0-1991 9®00® 1+9Y1000 OM 1990�91 19+1-n M2-92 lon-94 199N6 0-T. fetLL 1996-3000 10-T. T .a IM fJPITl1. ]am101 19 9rnr { C.iav-vni n— Wt Y. ],SlOrM 9,340,000 1,7W,a00 I.M.O. 110631000 3,316.000 la,f9a,000 310l1.000 19 9]9Y01 30 COrti,ctly, O.vK. 53.am 6a,000 53,000 20 u I., 3SO.= u9,000 u1,o00 ua.000 m,o00 i,u9.000 1,ao9,on 3,0661OOo u 32 33Wusu[ 9ua 70,W 91,ow 93,000 107,000 In... 4){,000 949,OW 114u1000 la 7. 13 34 fi L M 49 v nm esl,om n.W ]06.000 176,OOo 10a,ow 1.1]1.ow 1.0661ow a,a99,om u 36 In I a — - 1+ems. n1,000 aU.. 365.0Oo 44S,000 622.00o 3,601.wo ],9Oa,a0o 5,002,0oo 26 31 O.Ct Ld.6 16.000,000 10.000.000 0.0m,.w {I.OW.Ooa {I,OW.000 u 37 SOOL 999110] 1{ra9],000 7Mr000 16,911,000 991.OW 19.a39.000 50,...1 0 {,63f,m0 61.W1,000 ]) L lO]iL AVAI3JY.9 '70D3]O 30.u6.OW 10.1L,OW 17.619.000 11560.0. 20,170,000 Sf.016.000 10,033.000 f0,6o0.000 L 30 6N[. .1 J0 voib T[rtart vlurt 5.512.000 7,674,000 a,u1,00o 6,e69,0o0 a,ee],ow W.W.a00 0.6161.0 26,663,000 30 ]1 3Wtaa6 mu.c . enl+ 1,e00,wo 650.000 3]l.om a50,w 670,o0O 6,a+5,o00 a,950,oa0 u,245,0a0 31 32 2.360.w 2,350.000 2.250,000 4.750,000 6.150.000 u 33 oWc xUw 113".aoo 1.366.000 a,aK,mO 1] 34 IO3dL 6ZP®3309m lo,905,0W 9,424,900 9.0261000 5,536,Ow 6,672.000 {O,aID,ow 15,626.00 36.306,000 35 35 9r.xw a C.[z{-ooa to 9. T. 9.3401000 1.704.0oa S,e6a,o00 4,043.000 aa,615.a" u.a"'Wo {,39{.00a 4.319.000 35 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ........... ........... SOIW9i 36 9r...r 1 C.ccTO.vc ilu W1 Yr[ 6.9]{.W0 Lf.05f.000 6.559.000 33.509.000 9.6911000 6,9]{.000 L.035.000 {.9]{.000 31 37 3O[iL 9t+O0[ u,092.OaO 0.563.w0 u.Oal.OW O,OW,OW ]a.u).OW 60.+H.000 70.Of0.00a 151.01.1. 37 al 30I14 AVUmLff T 190 b,016.w0 19,93610a0 M.U.,aw u,ll2.000 u.tu.O" W.9u.Ow 06.a10.00 I37.%3,000 36 31 fOal4 ®610733095 la.132.w0 u.367,w0 iball.OW u.6]Ip00 15,0!4,Ow 69.565.W0 )].08,000 113.333.w0 39 a 0a[[v-G+[ m M.1 i..v 14,054.wa 6.559.000 13.6w,000 5.665.00o L.WS.wo L.w5.000 14.640,000 14,640.0W {o 6a Sut T.. .. DtT P.c1W lutlina 9.aul.rr4 1.512.ow 3,473.Ow 2.930,000 1,591.000 41205.0" 4.2ft.O 617el,0oo 6,761.OW al n 3® 11Y63 ® 10313CIS1 12,572,000 4,wl,o00 101501.0w 5,330,000 U,ev,wo 13,632.oW 7.63910. 7.05"Wo a ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... i ........... ........... ........... 0 54g3. 3War 9..L. n,mo 12,310 .2,5a0 42,640 12,770 93.590 Q u 9,u0.3 ee 9w 9p,lVYrR Du.311,q mui. 1w aw aw ao9 aoo l5o N 45 Ytl.arl W,.,.ct1m ]r 4m. 1215,= m+.ao0 13511wo 1...,aw pn,oW 135,1000 45 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY Oil ATIOA+ O�toP°lit°a OOlsr'A J Ca en �O ° a N `Since 1954 .t �"VGE COON BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1990-1991 FISCAL YEAR COOELY BA mTrOE DISSR M. ] 6/20/90 B00082 R6COB20D01ASIOEB Pp 1 1990 91 PIBCAL YEAR 0I3MR A] 8018LNY APPPOY® APPROV80 P8C1Y9�fD® DP2OIIMM 08 ACCOOBS 2I15Jt BOOGEi 00DOE2 BOIX;BS 1988-09 1989-90 1990-91 A800IA81pDIS8: s ooa[atila ■ Cao1L1 Nauliov�b: OP ratim 10,855,000 11,262,000 0,218,000 C to 1. Ptatl 17,805,000 + Capital Eatlliti" Ptatl 29,173,000 25,083,000 28,253,000 BOB-1 n OPBMSI80 A CAPIM 60,028,000 36,345,000 59,276,000 Do" Patira t, Batl W Interact R - 1951 36,193 BaM W Inu "t A - 1962 664,000 507,112 I 296,000 Hand and Intaiaat P,Ba1 - 1970 685,000 335,988 + BOB-30 ReSIRHOmIS 1,363,193 543,000 296,000 "n REp0IR8IDD@B 41,391,193 37,IB8,000 59,5]Z,000 CXR)RY BAXIrMIOX DIMfCS M. t 6/20/90 BODOHS 880010®ID Mwa ppe 2 m 1990-91 P18OAL MR DIB CS 27 SUMMARY APNXIy® APPROv® RBOO� DHHCPI Qs OR ACCDMff T=ff e0D38S B9D08y BDIXMS 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 80XDIN, O atlas a Capital putlLg, CaN ■ IIRVataenta (Appropriated ... Faeetvu and Carry-0 r) 32,609,000 27r805,000 24,559,000 Omer Ravalara 3,853,000 4,580,000 30,393,000 a A iclpatsd Sax Allocation by 11 Lsvy 3,566,000 3,960,000 4,324,000 e+ SM-IIfSA6 Op TIXO A CA 1 40,029,000 36r3/5,000 59,276oOOD m W4t RetirAsrR Cash A Imestaente (Apropristsd `� RaasiVY A Carry-Ovar) 1,289,193 005,000 291,000 Mbar 96,000 38,000 5r000 c. Aaovnt Raised 0y Saxes for Daft 0Dli9atlOD w =-SDIAL DIEM ImyIRlO®IS 1,363,193 843,000 296,000 Wfn y m AI,]91,19] l],I88,000 59,SI2,000 • Adjusted for Intmr-9 Iraosfarr Me C y is prumtly i p.Lff,ainn taus in oofsretion alto a dlswts over ,m assasse,l valuation. Saxes ispo m u of ]gar 30 amount to $64,459. m CDUSSY BANISASION DIBSNICS M. 7 Par 1 BODGBS BBCAQORDASIwB 6/21/90 y 1990-91 PIOCAL YGR FWD 47 0PBIUSINO Lj BBS➢DAS6U APPBOP® APPROM ACTUAL IOLCOH701ID1� DEBUIPSION M accom SISLE 6DDON2 BODGES �ISONEB BODGES V 1988-89 1989-90 1989-90 1990-91 OPBMSINO L DiraetoW Bra 12,000 12,ON 14,500 16,000 Ccwtract, B icr S A of JOLR Op ting 2,749,000 3,638,000 2,834,000 3,680,000 V Sru N4lntwera 395,000 395,No 191,600 350,000 xa7EOU Lin a Nat Nall Nspairs 50,000 50,000 50,000 Pump Station Maint� 297,000 310,000 238,400 325,000 Parfit and Ind.Naata A4ain. 126,No SS0,000 212,000 228,000 Cmaretion Br Admin. 25,000 97,000 39,800 91,000 �Diat. Barr Or cna 2,000 2,000 I'm 2,000 y,J BMA Col ction Emm. 100 SOU 100 Ear/Br Collaetion E� 50,600 9,400 9,200 9,900 ltaaa0rar'a Inr twnt A4a. A Banking Par 35,000 20,000 20,900 23,000 VI Uti2itir 65'"0 140,000 110,300 1301000 L Orr Br Rz� 0 5,400 3,100 861000 P[ofral B icaa 13'"0 25,000 77,800 23,000 L Printing And P001iration 1,300 3,000 3,300 3,NO Sra A Meeting - Diraetora S00 500 600 1,000 r4 OrrcolUeGlOU Acm� 1r300 1,300 800 1,500 TOTAL OP0 T=Q 3,785,000 4,859,000 3,779,900 5,022,000 u NaN-aPBNAnxD I72aiaat 68,000 161,000 164,000 182,000 Ya BNpaluaa Applicable to Prior Yuan ON 1,000 1,000 TOTAL NON-OPffiAT NO 69,000 162,000 164,000 L83,000 V TOTAL OPEN ma A 0N-08630m" 3,854,000 5,021,000 3,942,900 5,205,000 R8H8IN88 V Appropriation for Cantinganeir 5,074,000 3,772,000 5,410,000 Author"" Ganral NaaaM 1,927,000 2,469,000 2,603,000 1.4 TOTAL NEeBNV® 7,001,000 6,241,000 0 8,013,000 "AL A$7OI10mmm 10,855,000 11,262,000 3,942,900 13,218,000 v I ' Y,i CWIIyY BABInA m DIBSE M. 1 P." 2 HODOEy ABCO}Ot Mus 6/21/90 3990-91 PO)D] I) OP6 fla BByLBS® APPROV® APPDOpBa ACSBAL MEDOIMU.MW D88CACAIPSIOB OA ACCDOR STSLi BDD432 BUD08y 8881D7IyUM® BDD48y 1988-89 1989-90 1989-M 1990-91 AVAILABLE Y DIBD CaeD ! InveetafKs m (AppmpiilLlA PaeeNee CW carry-Me) 6,262,000 6,U2,000 6,789,300 7,885,000 Ylee 433,000 366,000 404,A00 "S,000 v..r Yeu a B o Artlrlet ! B1e0. Y Ip18 400,000 454,000 045,800 %4,000 DBLi qu Text 122,000 186,000 261,500 286,000 WB-102AL 1,027,000 1,006,000 1,"1,700 112951000 Sex ALloeetion 3,286,000 3,455,000 3,444,700 3,721,000 I+idevelal�9nr A� PW-th u9D 192,000 245,000 230,300 235,000 �am 80,000 74,000 80,300 82,000 `a BUM-3 " 3,566,000 3,191,000 3,033,300 1,039,000 302AL AVAILABLE YOEDI80 10,855,000 11,262,000 12,021,300 L3,218,000 COOnrY BABI MOn DI82TICr AO.7 Papa 1 'V BUM Wr p8COM10flfM1'Tlws 6/20/90 1990-91 mflC MR Fq 67 CAPISAL PACIISSI88 18yL1AT6D I APPIOv® BPP191V® AL19AL nnNeWBD OSeCPIP[IOW On ACWOIR Z1yL8 B0D081' BpD08r ffiPBImIr08ne BOMDir 1980-89 1989-90 1989-90 1990-91 L PR03HCSB AND ffiPetIDIrOPSe ir"b PL nrpv 6,126,000 7,026,000 4,241,000 7,798,000 v Appropriation for Ilaabi-P]a011ad Sr�atrR P1 Pae131t 14,502,000 3,732,000 8adlo Llnbd Telemetry Syataa 123,000 rl Su P1en/SIS 0pdab 33,000 , Allocation for Loral ewers 7,150,0oo L Orage Park Aerw eawr Imt&Llmmt P�rduaea 60,000 144,000 n4,000 id I Ora,ge Palk Aerea Tronk 750,000 Babe-4LMur Inbroepter, Sh1-SA,D 2,201,000 5,2oo,00o 1,241,000 4,000,000 bke Ulw roro ndrn, 14-1-2 899,00o 2,100,wo 1,soo,000 Pow Station noditiutiorm, 7-11 1,289,ow 904,wo 049,000 2,050,000 L POp Station AO�, 7-14 1,100,000 Br0a9 8uerrlplk Pare l- 400,000 V Kr Litt Station 200,000 Caaru Sella! �, 7-10 550,No 50,Goo 850,000 6 ' kJ Main Str P� Sta l., 7-7-1 7,000 1,600,000 lrvirr-Se9port 80Etrimk Sellel, 7-39-2 450,000 Airport Diversion (8oet8(, 7-10-1 650,00o rerun-Oraiga RW 17 ant 1S 600,00o r 8onf2 r Intatcaptor/ Banta A River Protection 770,000 CrePrord Cwyon never Selocation 100,000 Joint war" Equity P� 878,000 1,867,000 S,ew,000 2,042,000 I narth,;r /Bleed D " mebrve 258,000 342,000 377,000 Appaoprlatlon for Oie 1r Pecllitiee YaproawanU and 8wmsson 400,000 350,000 149,200 1,000,000 V TOTAL 7®pOIRMMNTO 29.173,000 25,083,000 8,420,200 28,253,000 V .� CWIRy BABISATIFAI DIGS M M.1 FAT 2 DODOES NmD09@ nms 6/21/90 d 1990-91 FIBCAL YEAB PDED 91 CAPITAL FACILISIBe H8SDD1S8D APP®9® APPPDV® ACSOAL QED DE8O1IpT OB ACC008T TITLX BST HaDG6S EIpIDmISOAEB BOD[DR ,e 1988-89 1989-90 1989-90 1990-91 AVAILABLE POImI110 m CUE 6 LNYtYMft (AppmprLttl Erovu And C�) 26,341,000 21,=,000 21,934,0" 16,614,000 c Scw[�c !av Custxvetlm Pvd 1,198,000 ,� Curtivctiu� Ofallta 111,000 188,000 142,000 75,000 COureflm FW 500,000 1,940,000 11051,000 1,824,000 Ixdatrial puts FW 111,000 150,000 194,000 175,000 BW of CApA ty agg 292,000 321,000 261,000 602,000 m AD2rtxatim FW 1501000 m Lt1�sv! uld MLc. I pb 116601000 1,161,000 1,928,000 905,000 SFADl[Y' [i[a 1951 Bud FIYd eOB-SO2AL 2,826,000 3,760,000 3,926,000 11,S19,000 1 n AVAILABLE FO10)IBO 29,113,000 25,OE3,000 25,860,000 28,35],000 L CW11TY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. ] 6/20/90 L BODORT NBCVIDODIDATIONB 199D-91 FISCAL Y&AR I V POND I] OONBTROCTION/1990 BBTIM = APPROVND APPI!]VBD AMU RBCOMMSNDSD D®CRIPTICN OR ACCOONT TITLE HOD('8T 8DDC8T MENDITON88 BODG 1988-89 1989-90 1989-90 1990-91 W PRO1PCfB AND EXMMITDRRB r Tretuler to Capital Psr111tiea ],]98,000 Da Ieeu . Coat 3,750,000 r Reserve for Neater Ple Projects 14,055,000 r 3pTAL RBQDIRHMPNTS 0 0 0 25,603,000 u AVAILABLe PIMDJ,d_Q Cesl� ertl Imeeteeste r (Appropriated Reserves and CerrT-wee) r proceeds frog Borroving 25,000,000 IDtermt A Nier. Receipts 603,000 r TOTAL AVAILABLR PONDING 0 0 0 25,603,000 r r I L u L I � L+ 1e COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 BUDGET RRCOMMENDATIONS B/ZS/9O r. 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR PUNp 47 BOND AND INTEREST - 1962 rn ESTIMATED APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL RECCN XDED ESCBIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET EEPRNDITUREB BUDGET m 19R8-89 1989-90 1989-90 1990-91 BOND RL7IRP1@flT AND INT=ST m Principal on Ronde 200,000 21U,000 210.000 220.000 r Interest on Bonds 30,600 23,400 1 26,400 15,840 TOTAL 230,600 233.400 236,400 235,840 m AUTHORIZED GENERAL RESERVE 433.400 273,712 60,160 TOTAL REBUIREM6NTS 664,000 507,112 296,000 AVAILABLE FUNDING Caah A Investments (Appropriated Reserves and Carry-over) 628.000 353,000 451,629 291,000 r Transfer from 1970 Bond Fund 137,112 24,862 Interest A Mlec. Rocaipte 1 36,000 17,000 47.927 5.000 SUB-TOTAL 36,000 154,112 72,789 5,000 TOTAL AVAILABLE FONOING 664,000 SOT,112 524,418 296,000 Outstanding G.O. Banda 6130/91: S2ZO,000 re FLul Payment Date: May, 1992 u r r r V COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 BUDGET RECOMENDATIONS 6/28/90 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR I FUND1 E7 BOND AND INTEREST - 1970 fJ I � ESTINATSD APPROVED APPROVED AM" RECONNBNDED DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET EEPENOITURES BUDGET loss-89 1989-90 1989-90 1990-91 L BOND RETINIDDSAT RND INTEREST Principal an Bands 300,000 325,000 325,000 Interest on Bands 31,676 10,888 2,632 j r TOTAL 331.678 335,BBa 327,682 0 Transfer to 1962 Bond Fund 137,112 24,862 AUTHORIZED GENERAL RESERVE 353.324 L TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 685,000 473.000 352,544 0 AVAILABLE PONDINO J Cash A Investments (Appropriated Reservea and Carry-over) 647,000 452,000 352,544 L Interest A Misc. Receipts 38,000 21,000 rr SUB-MTAL 38,000 21,000 0 0 j Lr TOTAL AVAIIABLE FUNDING 685,000 473.000 352.544 0 I`i W Ij IL+ j i be 1 t H H [ H H [ H A [ [ [ B [ H [ A H [ WDXR C DISTRICT w.1 P31/80 MwDY 01 DISTRICT DO IV WION 8 1110 Pwa10[0 9e0M9W TOTAL I 0.l.D. lo"I I99I-91 1902-23 1903-04 lut-so I S-bw TOY/ 1905-2000 10-9•Y uuI ...._..... ------_._ _--------- __________ _------__ ----_----- I -----_----- ___________ ------------ Pup ewewn wrom..,e. 1-u 1.108.000 I 150.00 360.008 aw,aoo .wo,ODo I 11100,000 1.10.00 OtNy fYeD low.9nm! (]) 760.00 I 160.0w 1 150.000 160,000 OtWp PNl wn• BaNNe INYII. Pnwp. 1N.Ow I 20.00 ]O.Ow 30.000 30.000 30.00 1 100.000 N,wO 134,000 MMt•O1NUe IOwNwOwe. 141-1A.9 (S) w 9.241,000 I I,24l.w0 2.000.00 2.00.00 I 4,040.000 4,000,0D W.eilelrc 10ru wlu. 14-1-2 (x) • 1,9w,400 i OW,000 600.000 Iw.Ow 1 I,500,0w 1,50.000 w0Y eu4eawL pw1Y1 (D) 420,000 I 420.000 I 420,00 420.00 I MeY., Lift out l•n wl 230r000 I 350.000 j 350,000 250,M • t Np autun X Iflutlw•. t (1) (S) 2.089.000 I ND,000 1,aw.m ?",on I 1.050.00 2.050.000 Pup aNtlan Wru•untN (D) 1.00.00 100.00 100.00 a00,OW 000.000 100,000 ( I,000,wO I,000,00 nq„•N1uf 0uMtruL. 1-1D lil Ow,Ow I 00.W0 600,00 1w.0w I B60,w0 880,08. OOMI.au at.,atetwpwr/ t t Wt• we arotwtlro 111.000 IrOw NO,wO 130,040 ( 170.00 110,000 brt0 ieuN uDl•au•nt (a) 6.x00.000 I 1w,w0 2,400.000 I 2.600,000 2,70.00 6,200.000 D1rta m XW r.roa (» 800.00 I w,wo »o.000 I ew,0on wD,o9D alaar D.e Hill mwrwDwr (a) 6.300.000 I aw.000 I aoo,00D a,000,000 5,300,0o0 lsvlN-X••wet 0u0twnk bllaf. T-it•] 480,000 i 010,00 I 090,000 e60,00 ww cerroe i,.D suNro, 1-1-1 (3) • 1,wf,oW t 1,00o 300,009 1,300,W0 I I,aw,000 200.000 1,e00,090 DtwnW Tema bpYDro.na (» ew,wo t o e90,00 800,000 b0 X111 mw•wptee PULLbt (a) 1.300.000 I 0 1,e00,w0 1.300,000 a•IPXY 1.r.11•a/Mplwro•nt (a) 3.100,000 I 100,000 3,e00,000 000.000 1 3,100,000 3,100,000 C-4ud QaD`u b r blDutwn 100.000 I 100.000 I too.wO IW.000 wa 1r1Me 1—t IMMwwnl 100."0 I 100.000 t t 100,00 190,000 X1.ullu,un. enx•pe. 1,00----- ------0 --o,ow ....... 100,000 ------0 I .... -- ... .....0 _---- OaYID TOau 341922,000 i 2,146,00 e,610,000 1.110.00 3,020.000 I,fe0,000 3.000... t 22,240,w0 10,534,00 »,»t,oW ........... ........ ........... ........... ........... ........... ......... . I .......... ........... ............ • Put I. to W.WeN M NWlout XOdt 1. auu,-DI•nne0 u.ixitiu puvntlY —u. uutruptlu •• uetlnn. to M WYw W DYtelat RDA 3. w•ur•plw,M fwllltlo punutlY u r 0n•len w IWD/elNrwt b. 14 a. wewo-DunuO f .M.u• •o0n0uw ue uur• eblof.t.lw j QARr eNILTIOa 019R1CS ®. 1 6/w/p0 BraTMt pI a01aLSm (J,gy alpp Ig 1 IIIfJL 4a11N vN0-lppt SIYWIiI 1999-iaDO f w9E 1990-pv 1991-91 19n-9] v99}9e 1W1-99 I b-h4'ap41 199Fa0N w-{Yt SOt4 4{O 1 ppa6YTI11O IO® t 1 B...M. a 4rtr-W.[ aav Wt Yw 1,8N,000 i,01],00a 0,701,000 9,4"'m 9,712,M I 7,ea1,000 v9,]OJ,ON r,Nl,xO 1 1 I j p1YNa. i a pL.v. ue it ru Rloratan 4,321,00 l,ess,000 1,0u,ow e,4n,m e,ex,eN 2512iJ100o 3l,u9,0w aa,ua,w0 a a rwi LvwtcLi Yua ue,0o0 !v],aw N9.OW sn,O ?"Im 31002,000 6.041.000 9,m,m a ie vr: aw i.au,oa0 3.221,M 4,e , N 9,Mr,M I 16..l0.00a x.No.ow o.Mlow 9 ! l.NN.t a tl1.r11u�u Inoa N.,aao en,000 6121O 67$.M rw,ow t 21x61. 3.ew1o00 a,Me,wO a 1 6 o r P.vnu ---- J I 1 r mra pavNw 5,331,00 9,024,00 w,No,aw u.iM,we u,aM.aw 7 47,809,wo M,aN,ow tn,atl,ow r s r3]N. 6v614iaLa IOMUO v,M,N0 17.e37,00 w.n6.w0 w,an.we aa.M.w0 I ee.nl.aw oo.MIM M.au.ow e 1 t t aaemm�® t p Blw. ee aWnt 9er4 e 6 o a,No,wo l,m,wo 6,u0,M s,Ms,wo 9,859.m aa,396.0w u,ol,ow N.rn,ow 9 10 001Hctlon onto e a 0 W otbr opr. 1,323,w0 1.60i'm 1,611,M 1176s,w0 11853,90 6.435,000 10,751,"0 w,176,ow to • u o.x 4..,ar a,soo,oN a,No,we .,aw,ow .,ow,aw ss.rw.oN N,ew,ow ar,No,ow ss . as M. ®mmlmnN s,aos,aw S.M.C. gxs,ew 10,860,00 ss,m,aw t 45,471,6N 79s9:,00 ue,Na.wo as 11 BwM. 1 C.[r{M.. to ew rux I,W'm 6,7N,wO 9.61a,0pp p.rta,ow 10.301W lo,xJ,000 w,a6o,oD0 ae,iN.000 u j 1. 2,603,M 6,x7,0w 6,Ist.ow s,u0,000 6.6N,Ow t s.6N.000 91573.M 9,e78,M N t 16 I,M s.1na. Or IT6i.0 51110.M 4,537..0 I,raa,M l.Na,M l,Nr,Ow 1,447.w0 610.000 676,W x ........... .......... .......w. ...vvv.. ......vve t ........... .vvvevau vverrvv 16 SL " 1.21 wiLno U.— Ir as9 $7, as% Ms $110 w va 6ue.r' M a9ulv.lrt anllln0 4IN !o,]oo ay.ON es.ew u,6w N,6w 11 x 4tWW Ow 6w aJ,lfi],000 U,sil.0o0 611103.00 11.991,M 61.M.W L C fl [ [ H H [ [ fl H [ 1 [ [ [ 1 [ 1 fl [ i 3m»i UarnSUi 1,I12W@ M. 1 6/»l9e Bi1Hm[0 PaJ.IaC®UM MY PiU ] rlatac ms a99o-1»a tuwm as3o-aaw aUa 199F91 1991-12 1»2-93 1193-94 209490 I 1-1. SetU 1291-2w 10-Uit Utal on UPi»a i9M(a) 19 awmi 1 Gtry<Y9t 9ta Lut V. ».w6.Ow ]]s50.00 U,504,000 is,na,aw w,tas,ws I 16,674,000 4,b»,000 16,1740w i9 MVEMW { w Caatrvetim UwL 70,M I )].Ow )O.wa 20 ]3 Uii, OmatU® 1,034,00 1r912,0w 2.000.90D 3.11].Ow 2.21"WO I 20.0,73.000 12.07210w ]],944.000 at w L UILL Yrts 173,00 201,00 231,40 w6.Ow ]a,OW I 1.319.00 ],wO,Ow 31556.000 33 ]a OW w o,,mi r"mas aw,000 1w,Ow aw,aw a2,w0 lla,w0 I 1,ew,v00 1,601,M 311361000 w 26 U t a 04wIWww Leer 1.sw,Ow 11334,0" 94191000 9o1,ow 523,000 I 1,205.0w 2.111,M 1,6]],00 as w p0t 1. 11.000,w0 ls,mo,wO I 60.w0,w0 SO,wO.Ow w,w0,ow 26 i) fOSW NVOO[ w,wO,Ow 3,540,00 U.470.00 ],031.Ow 3.190.000 I IO,La.wO 29.1111Ow 0]1]06,w0 ]) 30 SOUO 0YYW03 MMUp "'on,ow 29,40,M H.1».w0 w,a».000 13.330.000 I 70.0041w0 33.100.M 1»r»1.Ow U -- w 111"I'DIfOaaB i » 30 aWn w MlI UNv. )i9iUmt PIMt ).1»."o 10,1».w0 9.a]O.0m 6r910r. 0.031r0w I ]9,91].00 1t,]».Ow w.3w.wa 30 ]s OLtt1R CLLUtin sw as 6rU0.w0 ].1]O.Ow 3.020.a00 1.]Oa.Ow 3.690.Ow I 22.360.6w 10,0U,aw ]2r]60.00 ]i ]3 ismmat YmU wul»Mtdaaa 3,063,0M700,M I ].M.0w ].002.0a0,M ]3 ]] OWL Lava lyaW ],]OOrwo 2.300rOw I 6.000.000 1.6w,Ow 1.000.000 l] 36 301a0 aLLa111I0w ]0,]00,Ow 11,890.000 16,705,000 0,670.w0 0.]]1.000 I 10.19914w 10r319.000 91r611,000 36 30 W vut T. 25.aw.w0 U.501.Ow is,]]9,Ow U,15,w0 4.6w.000 i 1.6w.M 9,061.000 9.061100 36 evvsvvvvaevv evvvevvveeee ......vve.ev vevvev..... eveve..evv.. i avvea.vveveo emvvv..aav veeeeeemvv w s1ryU aW1Y YWaro Cemwetl0,M 03.2M S3.390 03.110 $2,640 92,)]0 0,549 36 37 vawt a] ar]wlli Mllim WLLU bw 800 an an am 000 31 38 6tlutr fdt .0r 3naM 91,aw,wo U,912,M salma,Ow a2.112,000 »,]U,Ow »,02,0w as GO]Yf WI]AaIOe VHIBBC W. 1 9/20110 9S6I61mR. 99NBR® cluou ]IW Y.0 ] IIB06a Y66eB H.B-...t 1106100l 1099-2000 Was 1990.91 ....... 199]-9] 1993-94 1914-95 I e-YHr ItM 1996-]000 H-YHv Rt l LIO B01m HHlel I H BHBrw 5 oHrY-Q'.r Iw 4.t YHi 11a,000 60,N0 1 291,000 M1,000 39 969Ym I N m HW 1.8.000 I Halo" a6e,000 40 N InbH.t 5 w.ull.,.x.0 anmH 5.000 5'aw 6,000 .1 1 N 1pu 969pN6 6,000 sSe,oN t--- 5,0N .. MN a90IFHR a010IH 295,m 216.N0 I 46.1000 N.'m N QP®IfO955 I 1 45 5tlN 9r.VaU, . 1..1 216,000 ]]0,000 i 464.000 164r00 46 46 icwfH to CH1t.1 M1cf11t1H I 56 .Y mrA1 Q10AOIS8050 ]]6.N0 223.000 1 .N.NO 464,00 57 45 P+..rvH 5 Cw.-'Mr b IHt YHc 60.ON 1 N .9 Pert YHt'B Ory Mc_+0],bN1M 9Nelruurte 60,N0 I .9 eo Iutl Btl.nH er lo.uu:l I so ...H0...... ............ ........... ............ uH........ ........... .....uu.. ........... Bowuvr 1 51 9...rv.. 5 1'uribv.r ha. I.Ht I.H 25,85010" ]].931.000 20,208,000 341611.94" 11.e47,000 1 ].,Seo,ON 14.11210N 34.050,N0 51 ea 1mu P59W06 35.722,000 12,737,000 20,541,000 14,410,400 15,498.m 1 1061196.000 101,I00,000 214,816,044 as ea Mu]9]ILIB= IOX0I50 51.592.000 46,660,000 461757,... a,M,NO 35.345.008 1 1 'sami' N 122.612,000 239,741,000 0] 54 1mu RPIDO)aT19® 25,..a,. 26,410,ON ].,066,oN I"im.ON zo.m.m 1 1161134,000 1"'001.0" 220,135.000 55 55 9.Hrve. 6 4rry-p.r to vut Y.H 33,931,000 ]o,]N,. 25,591'. 19,047,00 14,9L',000 I 15,91a,ON a9,6ss,m 1➢1611.000 55 55 a.rt Y.H'. Bry P.r106 F W 9.9Wc.rnH 2,163,00 0,16I,000 0160a,00o e14a010" 5,666,000 I 5,056.00 9AH,amo 9,17e,BBo $6 57 10101 BN.6X® OB (Mimi) 3112601,000 So,eu,000 20.0101N0 14,419,040 9,096,oN I 9,056.000 "'w"m 10,N6,000 57 ,,,a....... ........... ........... .......... ........... 1 ........... ........... ........... COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY PZyITAT/O,V Qolitaa O _A� m`to to�OIST� 0 N - b 0 g9NGE COVN�,1 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1990-1991 FISCAL YEAR COOOSY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.11 6/20190 BOD(D32 RBCOIOODD)ATIONB Pa9a 1 1990-91 PIBCAL YM DISTRICT An SONNARY APPSOM APPAOM RBCOfO®ID® DIBCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BODGES IRMN NT BODGES 19aB-99 1989-90 1990.91 i Owratira i Capital Aa9DSTaNanta: Opesatim F1 6,539,000 7,302,000 11,175,000 Cetutluction 91Na1 19,294,000 Capital Facilities Taal 10,10a.M + 10,652,000 13,709,000 BOB-TOTAL OPdaATIDG A CAPITAL 16,647,000 17,954,000 64,178,000 Daft Aauraesnt: Bo:a4 and Ipt .t F1aai 92,000 63,000 37,000 SOB-TOTAL M*nREIRRRE 92,000 63,000 37,000 TOTAL RBOOIRMITS 16,739,000 17,997,000 44,215,000 +uluatw Tor IO -B Transfers Cmm OABIrArIOB DIBSPICr BO.11 6/20/90 B00(OtS RRCO0®IDASIOOa Page 2 r 1990-91 vxsc , ym DIBMM all BOBMAPY APPIb9AU APPADp® PECWD®ID� DBBCRIPIIOB OR ACCOOAS TI BOBS WMW BDObr 1988-69 198"0 1990-91 od POADIBO, ud O94ratfn0 A Cmmital Fundina: Cash A Iflwateefi (APprO Utsd m Rswrvss and C4rrr- r) 11,198,000 7,338,000 7,306,000 Otbsr PMa14 3,522,000 • 3,473,000 34,406,000 R m Antieipstsd Su Al tion From it Lavy 1,927,000 2,141,000 2,467,000 BOB-3Um OPBIIAILI0 a Cl1PISAD 16,647,000 17,984,000 K,170,000 mN 040t R4tSr4mYlt �+ Cash A I tssnts (ApproprL R4seavw A Cmrry-Ov4r) 48,000 16,000 22,000 ar Otlur Rsv4nu4 8,NO 11000 1,000 Amount Railed by Taxes for Debt Obligation 42,000 26,000 14,000 BOB-fOZAI, Dm0r RBSiP HM 92,ON 43,No 37.NO ar rOIA4 POBDIsa 16,739,000 17,997,000 44,218,0D0 */W304ted for IIIC4 Fund Sr4nsfers m The County is Presently imps riling tam In rono.rtion uith a dispute aver e.0 YmmM Valuation. Tames impour a as of Juns 30tb smeunt to A320988. COOBSY SABISA M DISTMcr a . 11 Paw 1 r BDD087T �O58 6/20/90 1990-91 nB YEAR PDeD all OPBIUZI80 r serlBAr® APPROY® APPPp� ACf0A4 BBC ® DASCRtnOB oa AC iliLs EMarr BQDca12 HIPBID)ISOBffi SDDOES J 1988-89 1989-90 1989-90 1990-91 opmu2x5c u nl:«mr. Pw 7,000 7,ow 5,9aa 7,090 Cencr.etual Beiviw Bean of ioi t OP tln9 3,239,000 3,173,000 2,375,400 2,975,Ow r 2nmk Xai� 110,Do0 124,000 1%,300 225,000 Ba Lim a LLB AePafra ll' ,ow 15,090 15,000 Pow Station 6aintaance 330,000 125,000 84,IM M0,000 r PerMt and x .Baste Adam. 70,000 70,000 113,BD0 122,000 Ce'netlan Pr Adafn. M,000 39,200 30,700 85,500 T"Jess Coll on Ei 8,300 9,900 10,300 n,000 12eaa02er'a Imrtavrt Me. r A BankSrg Dar 10,000 5,500 3,7w 8,000 O Utir 85,000 a3,000 81,100 90,000 r Orr Pr Bxva 35,000 72,000 5,300 76,000 r Proleaalorul Barvloa 5,000 7,800 23,300 50,000 Pcifrtim Alai PODlication 1,400 1,1w am 1,000 r travel A Beetln9 - Dlra<tOra 300 500 200 NO TlrollectlDL Aoco, 1,000 1,000 1,000 'P2A4 OPBBASI80 3,753,000 3,730,000 2,935,900 3,757,000 r NOH-0PABA7IMC Intei'rt n,OOo Skpwae App11ca0 to Ptlor Yaara 3,000 3,000 3,000 r TOME 6DN-OPBBA o 36,000 3,000 0 3,000 TONAL OPBB nw a MN-ovap" DO 3,789,000 3,741,000 2,935,900 3,760,000 r' BA6r8Vt6 Appropriation for Contlrgr ea BSS,000 1,690,000 5,535,000 r AutMrirM Oe�al Raearn 1,893,000 1:171:"Mo 1,880,000 1OtaI. Bl�BAP� 2,750,NO 3,561,000 0 7,415.000 IOlAL BS0DI9BNIDISS 6,539,000 7,302,000 2,935,900 11,173,000 r W r COmRY BABISmm 0I8r8ILT AO.n P� 2 9000ES TOEOMKCK r M 6/20/90 v 1"0-91 nI 46119 m 9mm 9u aP®an90 ®rear® APPA09® APPBO9At1 ACr®1L ID DE8QIP M O8 ACL908r n4,B BODDar HOMM EU 1 r O888 WDOffi 198 69 1989-90 1989 90 1990-91 m �'AILABLB,_909DI50 CUE A Irtvrte9nts � (Ayp�vpsl8ttl B9A9CPtl \� CAiey-OPa[) 2,I91,000 218%,0" 3,554,M 81/681000 F. 274,000 227,000 M2,500 235,ON Urr F. L,281,000 1,8511000 1,973,300 2.5a,000 ,� IOLzrt A 8 . 8�cr 1pu 1%,NO 227,000 399,900 457,NO ^.l+,.# Sur 70,000 107,ON 157,300 173,ON c eOB-idL1L 1,821,000 2,412,000 2,M,000 3,M,000 `a T" A210c Um 1,877,ON 11991,000 2,078,300 2,295.000 BUCvr[Sur "'we 53,000 68,500 49,000 ee 808-SOlAL 1,927,000 2,034,000 2,126,600 2,294,000 rOlAL AYA2LABLB 2O DUG 6,339,000 7,302,000 B,N3,800 31,175,000 r COUIISY SARISATIOM DIOTRIC2 M.11 Page 1 r, B=HT RBCUO ATIORS 6/20/90 1991-91 FlB YEAR r FORD In CAPITAL FACIDITnu MIKAyBD r APPAOV® APPAOp® ACTUAL RBRlD0i1 w D88CRIP[IOR OR ACCDUBT TITLE BDDfiET BUD= ISOA88 BODOBZ 1988-89 1989-90 1969-90 1990-91 r PRDJBCTB AM EIPEMDISURBB Treatment Plant Bxp.i. 6,791,000 7,098,000 4,284,000 6,826,000 r Appeoprietlon for Mamtms-PL Sreataent Plant Facilities ri Rater Plan/EIR Update 40,000 I . V Padio Llriked hlstry System 15,000 Blater Ave. P.S. Paplacement, 11-17 1,800,000 3,133,000 37,000 4,503,000 V Slater Ave. For. Main/ gravity Bever, 11-17 1,000,000 ►/ DSetslgt No. 11 Purduma Lirr PaluO., AWetlomen! ane ftl oatlon 300,000 I r r Ocean A. Trm PeluD., 11-16 650,000 6,000 Edward. T 26,000 Joint Yorke Equity Purtluee e23,000 I�a� garthq •va/Flood Deaage Reaerw 286,000 3a6,000 330,000 Appropriation for District Facilities Improvrc,G and r E�ion 75,000 75,000 92,000 750,000 rcfA RBpUIR810IIRB 10,108,000 10,652,000 4,419,000 L3,709,000 r r r sal bl� re COUNTY BABITATIom DISTRICT No.11 page 2 B00GET RBCWD®IDATIONB 6/20/90 m 1991-91 pIBCAL YEAR PUBS 911 CAPITAL FACILITIES EBTINATED APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL R8L900 w m D88CRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGES ROPES BODGES 19a8-ay 1989-90 1989-90 1990-91 m AVAILABLE rONDINU CeaO A Imastrnts (Appropriated Raaar xM Cazry- ) 8,607,000 4.482,000 5,377,000 1,837,000 Tranafer from C structcn F e 6,826,000 m Construction Grants 196,000 190,000 163,NO 66,NO re Cwe Icn Peas 720,000 783,000 614,000 1,710,000 In trlal 9asts rw 82,000 67,000 70,000 80,000 Bale of Capacity Ruts 331,NO 324,ON 46,000 702,000 Sale of Capacity to District 3 1,500,000 650,000 m Joint Norm Equity Bele 3",NO 1,392,000 m Bolsa Corm Amaration Pr 2,750,000 Interot and Mac. Receipts 372,000 250,000 402,000 4a6,000 v SUB-TOTAL 1,701,000 6,170,000 1,275,000 11,872,000 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 10,108,000 10,652,000 6,652,000 13,709,000 w 1 ' COUlISY BAMITATIOM DISTRICT W. 11 6/20/90 BODGES p8C@OEDIBA loos 1990-91 PIsCAL YEAR FUND ail CONSTRUCTION POND/1990 1 u ESTIMATED APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL RECQO w DBBCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET ITUAES BUDGET v 1980-89 1989-90 1909-90 199"1 PPO.IECTB AND BTPIDfDISUPBS I '. T .fer to Capital PacilitiW FI 6,826,000 DaDt Iaauana Coat 3,750,000 lid Resarw for Muter Plan Prolaeb 15,544,000 YJ TOTAL REQUIRBMEDTS 0 0 0 26,120,000 j N AVAILABLE EmigO C and Im tmsr L (Appropriated RaN[vea and Carry-over) II Proceeds frog Bnl're iM 28,000,000 L Interest i Mite. PacelPte 1,120,000 Tra fer from Capital Par lltiea Fund Id BOB-TOTAL 0 0 0 36,130,000 � L■ TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 0 0 0 2s,1z0,000 I Id L Ili II V COUNTY sANITATION ossrsiOT No. Il s SMUT �TIONS 6/28/90 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR r FDND B11 BOND AND IIMW= - 1951 ESTIMATED APPROVED APPROVED ACTUAL E6CONNENDED DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUG" woo" ccfmBGrTmz BODOET e., 1968-89 1989-20 lase-90 1990-01 am 9E2IARI m ARP INTHIBBT r Principal ss Band. 19,000 19,000 19,000 Interest on Bonds 488 163 27 r Transfer to Bond Fund 1958 6.249 TOTAL 19,488 19,16E 19,278 AMORIZED GENERAL RESERVE 11.512 897 r. TOTAL EE0UIRMUNT5 25.000 14,000 0 AVAILABLE PONDINO Cash a Investsents ,r (Appropriated Rousmes and carry-over) 19,000 7,000 12,882 s Deli00uent Taxes 1,000 1,000 Interest A misc. Receipts 1,000 SOB-TOTAL 2.000 1,000 0 ANOUMT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES 10,000 6,000 6,994 ve TOTAL AVAILABLE FORDING 25;000 14,000 19,276 0 w r I ' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT N0.11 r BUDONT RECOMMENDATIONS G/28/90 1 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR us FUND 011 BOND Am INTRUST - LESS r BSSIM1i60 APFROVBD AFFROVRD ACTUAL RECOIOIRNOED DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET EE143MITUEBS BUDGET 1988-89 1989-90 1989-00 logo-91 r BOND J TDMMT ARD IRS'ffiISBT r Principal on Bonds 30,000 15,000 15,000 1S,000 Internet on Bonds 3,500 1,500 1.425 1.350 r TOTAL 53,500 16,500 16,425 16,350 y AOTROeI2® CSNAAL 8R986VE 13,500 12.300 20,850 TOTAL REOUIREPUMS 67,000 29,000 37,000 r AVAILABLE FONDIN9 r Cash 4 Ivvaetmentn (Appropriated ".."ad and Carry sr) 32.000 9,000 19,816 22.000 r Delinquent Taxes 2,000 1,000 1,000 r Interest A Mi=. Receipts 1,000 1,000 1,776 1,000 Transfer From Sand Fund 1951 6.249 r SUB-TOTAL 3.000 2,000 8.025 2,000 I AMOUNT TO BE RAISED By TAXES 32,000 10,000 17,016 13.000 r' TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 67,000 29,000 44.857 37,000 r Outstanding G.O. Bonds 9 6/30191: $120,000 Final Payment Date: January, 1999 No I r r H 1 1 l fl H H I t [ I [ f l I fl [ 1 [ OSmlf Bwlllil0�maY•tT w.11 S/w/w eamoai w olnuei awalns niam aawmi emote 191ii 7 a.l.r. two-u wl-n 1w1-n twYw law-w 7 S-l�r 4Yt 10w-w00 10•lrr m41 f e4sa .n. e. a. YylYrt.li-1f IiY i.w1.000 I al,Ow S,Ow,wo i,wO,Ow 1.000.Ow 1 e,aw,Om i,wO,Ow I aLW M. I. S./M•lq YPe. tl-lf (iM l.Ow.aw 1 IOO.aw p•.w0 t 1.0w.Ow 1.w0.Ow t eLee iw. 4i1•[ lal a,mp,000 f NO.Ow i,iw.Ow S I.wO,Ow l,Ow,Ow S,iw,Ow I mlMwt iwl•O�Ot (al t.iw.Ow a00,Om l.Sw.Om 2.550100 I .•tm,w0 .,lw,Ow 1 i 41l 4t•rvyW (al ].mO.Ow i No.= S.M.Ow I 2.5w.00 1.M.M a.M.w0 I S4ta/iRWYI. 404wet la) iw.Ow 1 0 mO.Ow m0,000 I Wpr YIYi lil wO,Ow I 0 mO,Ow m0,wp t mlwY NC 94t•m lyawrew (i) wO.Ow t I 0 iw,Ow i00,Ow I OL41at 4. ll MaY•• Llm YW. I iWJpamt ul 41emtW li/ mO.Ow ea,wo 2mr000 1 a00.aoa aw,w0 MIYll.ews M1wtS 1w.000 16.Ow 1S,Ow 16,Ow 1S.Ow Th.000 I 315.00 ilSrOw 1w,w0 OSSY fOiLL 10.wl.m 1 31.00 S.Sw.m 4.225.00 1.313.00 i.Mlaw S.W.wO 7 W.w6.000 4,00.00 m.no.m ....... . ......... .......... .......... .......... .......... ......... ......... .......... .......... 1. Wt•rOYW fwllltW Pmmtll w em•t[uetlm • O Wl1 rn0.0 w Ol.trlet Y. i a. tl Ull P•0 9N11t1Y p tl P4r 0Y1P a. Y•4rroL®•0 tmilltix • w t— dHv 0••IP/emSt[0etim vmm euaravm vaevaa e0. u ala9lro Baaiplpr o/ O.... fJeN ... yaq. i necat rove uvo-vva rumour vvvgom aav arvo-vt aura-va a9ra-9a avva-a. Yvava o-rrx rota a99e-amo ao-rrx rwa rm — a 9r.fr a c.ara-aw Ra c..t rr= a.vas.am a.aaa.am l,lY,mv l,an.aoo 7.0e7.am t e.ue.om a.vva.vvo a.au.om 1 orlvm ] 09 1. ].aa.0 ]. m ]dm. ).]U. m 11 .0 n,260, m IO. ] a 1— va. m 270,M 3u, m,m Ya, a'.. m 3,",, m 4,7a2,m a 4 a,a. , m a,me,m 3.6U... 4.4010 e,va,m I Y,en,00o u,.ea,om ao,av,mo . a l.rtre a tlYr11u,W. ink .al,om Ya,om so,am au.am .vs,om i a.ea..m0 ],us,om s,Ho.om a . ou.. 9aw•ar 0 0 0 e 1 mru vavnvt epm,om a.aa.o0a zaw,am e,4m,m0 9,49e,om n.em.mo 68.7te.m0 lm,aY,mo 1 e smw avYc.v.a .vmn0 u,ve,m0 v.ma.m0 Y,m1.000 Y.ma.000 U.5551000 42,n6.m0 75,m9,om M,l)..mo a eae®imvm I 9 eeaa. o[ Jo4rt Yox4 tl \ 0 )r%ar000 ).4]1.Om a.ul.000 4.MIM 1.101.m0 L.I.O.mO U.ea].m0 aO.tU.M 9 10 COYctlon 91+tr N a 0 utl awx qvx. learm0 eU.Om Ha.000 9m.Om U].000 ( a.]]a.000 6.N].Om 1.Ul.a00 to u Y M1Nt B.rvao )rmorpm ].000rmO armprm0 I.mprm0 Y.000.e00 YrOmrmO ]a.a00rOm Y t] M14 Q0m]1110U 2r160rOm a.]aa.Om )r9]0.Om e.9ra.000 9.6N,000 M.075.000 ta.4e4.000 101.5e9rOm Y Y 4rfw ) 1.410. lr]Y.ODD l.a.l. )rm]rOm ar9m,m0 a. . l0,lae.Om U,UerOm U 14 e.Y rr•. oa e..lae rne\..v vavaarrt. 1,Uo.M 000 a,w,m0 3,710,W mo .,us.mo 4.e27.00o t .,..en,.v00 l,eal,om l,ul,o00 u la r,M atLeu 0t IAfl4t] 5.53a.m0 9,395,W ].9]1.m0 2,059.m0 2,04,M I ).m\•Om ].]U.000 ]dU.M is oven..... . .....vaa vv....... ...vase.... .uavavv ( auvu.... ........... .aoae.vue as em9aa rrlr rae�o v..x rr eeo 110 470 tee Ym $.1 Y al Me.v tf e0uv.a.rt o..ulm muv m,9m e1,3m .51,650 63.m0 Y,]ao e..lm al Y uY..t a vrx rr a.su.mo v,me,o00 n.sY.000 641490.00o n,Ya.W a10,54a,m0 a r- r- r t- r r7. r_ I__ I - r I t I r_ c-. U I mm euxianu vam. lo. U 112010 exa}WYx OI eYWmm CaaB . Op6 a nYJ4 Yalaa UN-... UmI UU-NCO Lin uvo-va 1»1-92 a»rA »arY6 1»4-95 a-xrx xotLL UU-UO U-Tr um Lm, OAr]L MUM ]0 aw]w S Cvryrot+[ Rv Wa xre t,ea1,000 :O,xOa,aoO es6e,000 v,aN.000 ]a.U].000 1 t,U],000 3.e74,000 t,AI,OW » vavom _ 20 Cv,6tiueatm R6nt6 66.000 Ulm Ulm 20 U ]r., fma.[tlm 1a10,Om A1.o00 879,D00 926,W .1.1w f e,UO,Om e.oa.oOD a.m.. Sa a] ]mevfu vuY ao.Om .2.. 1m.m0 U1.. I.. m 6m,m0 1,m6,Om 1,529,000 » v Orr Sr6 t 0 0 0 A 36 eW oe 40aa11r 0amaa a,ael,m0 "' m 2ee.m0 110.om a]1,m0 1 a,ma,me t.uv,m0 a,Na,M » .1 r.rnuu, i.r 0 6 0 o ae 16 11e66,000 ..0U,m0 U.'. a.0A,0m e7a1m0 1 6,A],PtO 1,11],000 ],aA,mO » 11 U..,om a0.0op.000 1 6a.0m.m0 10.000,000 m,M.mO » 1.101,Om a,302.m0 0 1,»a,000 » » xo... »vAva aa.]u,m6 a,a],om A,ua,mt a,ul,mo l.Aa.om 1 ».e6a,om m.Na,om »,]T,mO » 30 m,I,v1 -- ] UO u.m].m0 a2.260.om u.A].m0 m.A].mo N.m].m0 I 61.403.m0 ..'ou' 0 Ulm,. N ®®imne I — 1 J] 6au6 of Jo42 Y0]4 a[rfr/rt V]uR 1.021,000 ......m0 a,1Y,000 f.m].Om a,]]a.000 u,m6.000 0,744.060 a6.Ua'. 11 ]I U.tllta EolNttlm 8U 2.11e.m0 4,220,W 1,375.mO a.i»Am $AU,Om f Ud»Am 4,00.m0 11.150Am ]] ]] otla I.r.,,r agrar 3,]e0,000 a,m0,m0 a,lm,em a,am,em e,250,m0 U N A]AL UMMSre® 11.601.000 U,60a,0pp 13.6U.000 eraUrem I0.3A.006 I 67.5».006 U,]31.000 l],eae.mD N le 1.rro. 6 Cu{]-en] b Yai Yr] 20.2021Om 0,643,Om U.Ua,mO La,U].me ],Ua.M ad]aAm ],IU.W 7,116Am ]e .......eu.. ......vcce. .esev...... .........ve ............ f ............ ........... ........... 36 B4gL ..v 1..UO 12.310 a1.61. U... p.TO UAaO U 11 aure of Y, aqulvaWlt M11Lq 01LL4 ]00 U0 ]66 AO in AO ]l ]e 4[frttl Cvpr]]m 1. II6i 111710.Om ae]1.. "U.Om a114m0 aa]0.000 $11M.00 16 mP1)r euzS]Ifv oxeYRR w. 11 6/20/90 O)]rYIYS A 99GMTw fJ®1 Rql 9v9v ] ROCJL rY99 1990-1991 f10LOtlf L9T2OW ixR Lm0-91 1991-91 UI.-U 199]-9a M.90 0-iYi mU lme-2. 104W r Ul UU ]9 b66['wv a Cu[YO.'v[ 2ts Wt rW 2:.000 al.ow a.000 1p.av 1].aw I 22.000 9.000 m.000 ]9 I mvma2 I SO iu Wr la.Oro lI'm 1I.W lI'm LI'm {$.w "W f10rw0 60 Sl LRv[rt a elaoll.n.P2. Inoue 1r000 tr000 1,000 1.0ee 1.Ow t Oreea 6,000 9,00a 61 62 Oiy[ Spsv 0 0 v] N re)w 91VOO2 1e,000 l],000 ]].000 11r000 U.Ow j RreOe 0],000 1191W0 N N 2{T]9 193xL9p11 )®L0 37.000 N.000 11.000 m.000 mrOw ff.000 {a.000 Ui.OW N 1 vU®I)x19m t ae m vr1m6N 6 xe).l..e N,000 u.o9e u.mp ss.m2 u.me t w,m9 u,mp ua,om ap N a.v2o m mlW 2wllur N n mru 6>P®n® u.pep u,ap9 u.aw u.ape u.aw i w.9ep aa.aaa lu.aw u u yvv[ t CartiMe to fut rN[ ' U.m lf,p U. m fw 0 10 Y6 'vRMMNpO � 21rm "Im 0 N 10,0U U.000 f.000 f.000 0 0 t9 ]o nd N2uYf pe INeaC1t1 p 0 0 e 0 t o 0 0 po ...v....... .....uvvvv v.vv....vv. ...vvv.v. ............ t ........... ........... ........... e0HY9r U a Oravr a pa[[y0aa[ )ie•Wt iN[ ].]22.w0 m. .W U.]U.wO L.R/.00D U.]v2.000 l.]U.000 a0.)N,. ).]R.OU R p2 1vu 9]wva s,w,mp a,Msm,a99 m,esa,900 u,)m.m0 ss,]m.ea{ n.ui3Oo9 m,N1,m9 W.M.O. el p] ))R31 AM. 9OwI U. N.]L.Ow U.2"'m 40.130.w0 U.N2.w U.a)f.Om { UI.m'm U.)aO.W U].U9.. U 1. 20Ly, ®®x3pm0 ..M.. UAU.000 2.'.U.000 1).m0,0w "A".. j U.U4'm Ol./N.000 1)O.eN.m pa ]p p0aysrv6l Cv[[{O.vt t0 NK Yvv[ U.6U.000 16.U3.000 U.026.w0 11r352.Ow le.)Oa.Ow 1 10.7N.000 1).pp1.0D0 17'W'w0 00 S. 2v[t .1.OR h[aW MtlYq Bv¢ul[utnu 1r001.Ow 3.141.W 2r725,m a.UO.W 4.su.000 I 4.0]a.Om ].w).. ).w).w0 U p) 20U O.VJvm u ImRRiI 25.727.000 U.UO.. 21,151.Om U,042.m0 p.9N.Op0 1 O.I..mO ID.Ota,W IO.ONrmO R vveovvav v......av ........... vvvv...... voavvvvuv t vvvv..... vvueuavec ....mvvv l 1 . l 1. a l l ` l e COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 _ OF ORANGE COUNTY P�kjTATlO,, olitan �I �to4 Oro S), J cA O i� 0 U o p Since 1954 .� ggNGE COUNT BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1990-1991 FISCAL YEAR `� COUNTY WITASION DISTRICT M. 13 6120/90 BODGNT RBCOHKMMTIDD Page 1 .a 1990-91 PIOCJIL YBAD DISTRICT 113 SUNKM APPPDVBD APRPD9® RBCOlD®IDID DNO FTIOU OR ACC tI17.N BUDGNT BU PDDG6T 19B0-09 1989-90 1990-91 s, RBgDIASIDMTB operating A Capital Requirements Operating AnW 313,o00 743,000 917,000 Capital Pacdlltiem Fund 7,261,000 9,947,000 12,414,000 m TOTAL augur om 7,374,000 10,690,000 13,331,000 FUNDING mr Operating A Capital Funding Cash A Arvaatsante (Appropriated R ,& and Carry- r) 6,587,000 7,484,000 9,779,000 ee OCDar ft. 907,000 3,206,000 3,552,000 Anticipated T. Allocation v From la Levy 0 0 0 TOTAL FUNDING 7,S74,000 10,690,000 13,331,000 �" AAdluete,l for Alter-PWId Tranefeie COUNTY SANITATION METRIC? NO. 13 Pa" 1 BODGMT BBGOl00➢IDATIONB 6/20/90 1"0-91 FISCAL YNAR PVKD In OPBRATIMO r ESTIMATED APPROVED APPAOV® ACTUAL AECCD®ED DSMCAID M OR ACCOUNT TITLE BUMCMT BUDGET S3PB11DISOP68 SUMST r 1988-89 1989-90 1989-90 1990-91 OPIPATIN0 1 Di ctora' Paaa 8,000 10,000 6,200 8,000 Contsact0al "Micas r 811aea of leSnt OParatitq 58,000 134,000 181,500 307,000 Trq,k MafntawAea 5,000 5,000 600 5,000 MatNo3a L aM NXL W21 Rapaira 23,GOO PA Stati. lWnts 3,000 3,000 r Para t aid Ini.Naate Amin. 1,000 1,000 1,000 Co ctlen Fr Admin. 00 113,f9,0700 108,600 114,000 ` 0aax Pw Coliactien Eapa�ua 800 800 1,200 60 Trwurar'a ImaatalaR Am. A BankiM Fr 4,000 4,500 300 1,800 Utilities 1,0➢0 1,000 L,DDO r Uaar Faa RD 3,000 6,000 2,200 14,000 I ' prefaaai.nal Sa1Y10aa 1,000 1,000 1,700 1,000 r PTintitq And puO110aticn 1,000 1,000 500 I,000 I ' Trawl A M ti q - Diroctora 1,000 S,CO0 500 1,000 r UncolleetLbla AcwAmta 1,0U0 1,000 Sr000 TOTAL On MMN0 106,000 205,000 302,900 482,000 r MON-OPMRATIXG Intanat 10,000 10,000 10,300 54'"0 r E a Amuca0L to Prier Yaaxa 1,000 11000 1,000 I ' TOTAL XW-OPBBATINO 31,000 11,000 30,300 55,000 L TOTAL OP8BRTINO A NCi-0PB llw 117,000 2%,000 313,200 537,000 li RESBSVBS r Appropriation for Coatinyanetea 137,000 "a,= 111,000 AuteexSzad Ganaral Raaarva 59,000 148,000 269,000 TOTAL RBBERVES 1%,000 447,000 0 380,000 TOTAL REQOIREHEM 313,000 743,000 313,200 917,GOO 4r 1 bw r V 1w 'g COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT M. 13 Page 2 BUDGET R8C0lS®IMTIONe 6/20190 m 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR POND 113 OFEIUTING ESTIMATED ApPPDy® APPIEIV® ACTUAL RECUIDOADHD DSBCAIPTION OA ACCOUNT TITLE MD BODGES 80008T EIF6ITURES BMWET 1988-69 1989-90 1989-90 1990-91 AVAILABLE FUNDING (ApproprlatW Remarvas and Carly-Over) 165,000 390,000 376,700 401,000 Omar Faam 138,000 315,000 320,100 NE,000 t+ IDtersst A Mac. Receipts 13,000 30,000 32,000 28,000 BOB-TOSAL 118,000 348,000 352,100 513,000 TOTAL AVAILABLE POImING 313,000 743,000 728,800 937,000 COOM SANITATIOX DISTRICT M. 13 6/20/90 V BUGBT 914=HDDATIONS 1990-91 PIBCAL YBM V POND on CAPITAL PACILITIRB BBTINArBD APPPOV® APPROV80 A=" BNGLl00➢DED DREM"ION ON ACCO08T TITLE H11mGRS BOUORT e2P8ADIrOAE9 BODGET 11 1988-89 1969-90 1989-90 1990-91 PRWRCT8 AND RIPBNDISOPHB I , SraatmalK PI Pag ti„ 95,000 134,000 81,000 269,000 y Appropriation for Nwtsr-PL I Traatmant Plant Paalutiu 3,086,000 4,778,000 6,549,000 L Capacity Right Pureha,a from District No. 2 261,000 613,000 613,000 319,000 Ca citY Right Purdu,a from DSarsiet No. 7 106,000 70,000 Appropriation for Putu Coll c on Byatu Capacity Rights Porchu 3,435,000 4,498,000 4,591,000 L Joint Norw Rquity PYrdYaa 392,000 117,000 1",000 603,000 8arthquaw/Pi0o0 Daugm Ruarn 6,000 7,000 L3,000 I i Lr TOTAL eRDOIRIDIB11T5 7,261,000 9,947,000 1,218,NO 12,414,000 ar AVAILABLB PONDIND CaM ! Il tmants 1 r (Appropriated PssarVM aM Carry- r) 6,422,000 7,086,000 6,902,300 9,375,000 C truetiom Grant, 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 C tion Pau 374,000 2,275,000 2,172,000 2,280,000 h` Bala of Capacity Righu 3,NO 3,000 ],000 28,000 II Joint Nerw Bqu1tV eat, tat hRsxut clad Niec. Racaipts 659,NO 580,000 752,000 726,000 I ! SOB-TOTAL 839,000 2,861,000 2,929,000 3,039,000 V TOTAL AVAILABLR PONDIXG 7,261,000 919/7,000 9,831,300 12,61l,000 I I ! IYd y WVNii e3Y]unp11 DIenIC[ NO. IJ e130190 S(MUMNY or GD.IOIn Wa® M IN 0I0n]Re' WJI IONI SlaTM nlw city. c.D.mtr PMJ�t------(PmbO --------- -OT"---- i -- L---- U90--- IDvl--- ------- uvJ-va uu-v! 6-iev TOt--- INS---ZHO---- .-I.—1pgl Stntt Yu ]bee ]pttmtDwe M 2,570'.. 1 De3,000 161,000 188,008 146,000 I66.000 160,000 1 In... a1a,000 1.6W,000 Bwta Lnu Su ]Iv[ ]nbmDtpe (3) e8t,000 111.OW tD.000 61,000 a3,000 61,0W 1e,000 263.000 ]]0,000 613,000 u Lelae 6WtapW (x) Ji,WO 1 3,000 J.000 a,0a0 e,va0 4.000 e,000 I 19.000 10,000 2e,000 mmu eWtyu![ Ix) 16.006 I 2.60p s,OW i,Da6 i,a6p 1,p00 LDD6 1 6,OY6 e.6op u,uo mt upLeSeie 1puewpwy (a) 33,006 e,000 2.000 3,060 3,D06 3.06 ].W61 Is.00e u,a6D 36,6o6 ]e[t IntetteDwe (3) 280.000 t1.000 xI,WO 231000 33.000 34,000 23,000 ( II6,000 136,000 316,000 Cvaon W]an ]patmtpwc (3) I.006.000 ]9.pop a2,000 55.000 aB.000 DS,000 25.00 1 442,000 5e7,000 3BD,000 ]up 11E lntecutpwe e03.000 I le,WO 68.000 e0,W0 I 116.000 328,000 ]03,000 6•milmtc e,d Otbe 0bte]d ] 1— (l) l,JD6,000 1 0 1 ------- ------ ----- -----O ------ e1--- ------0 ------ 366.W0 Ox1MD M. ......W0 ......000 a..,.. t00.... e13.... .... ........ ............ eB1.000 I i,x01,000 . ... ... . ... ... ®nY OYn11)OS vion-0a o. x IINI. 6SSfO1Q) 0 9HliATtd rJ@I ]Ip Van s rsSC94 nM IM-1991 L ROM 1999-3000 3,]a1 1990-91 1191-92 .2-9] 199YN 19W-H 9-1..[ io41 1915-3000 w-Tur ia41 Y)9a OFmlinO]0ID Lua T.v t01,000 x0,000 190r000 457r000 363r000 b1.000 ]OarOW b1.000 1 I 9aY00[ j 1 W .], 9f le li lllautlm I 3 a a...r IU. 7.YUN ( a t t a ]... b on )Oa,000 96a,m I,1x,000 1r b1r000 1 4,620,000,M nrlb,000 1].]66,Ow t a In4...3 \ ••.—•�.—^'.� wea ia,aw n,wo ao,000 x,ow b.w0 166,000 tb,aw aos,wo a 6 ow.r Yera-'^ I 6 ] )@P' Y0x'i 5131000 7391000 916,Ow 11,701. 11Ia61Ow ( 4.766r000 131660.000 1013941000 ) 6 M3L aninALLS MUM 9171000 1.1w,w0 ..]w,w0 1.137.000 2.019.000 1 I.w0.w0 14.] 3.000 10,7".000 6 =U®iTUR= 9 ®.n 9f JOYR Yw0 tl 6 0 x],9w UnIm Ab.000 ]11.. 910.000 I 1.55" w 9.xA.000 1].3]erw0 9 w fn]]s31m ei.v tl \ o me agar a9u. no,wo xe,000 a0a.aw aaa.aw ta.ao0 1 s.ex,000 a.uS,00e t,aw,000 10 u aear ]So,nelmv 1 u w lO]lL @®ai09n e37.000 71 .000 e6a.000 1.C6t.Ow 1.31 .000 I t.bA.000 12.IN.000 x.9x.aw u n 9 . V . \ o[i Ii b Mai T. x0,000 ]w.w0 b).w0 ..'m ]OA.9w I 65". 1.80.00 aL6)O.9w 1] ]I aut Yar'. Ors h11w 3uWnp 9palt�mta i69.000 ]10r000 46.00 n].000 637r00 1 6n,Ow 1,]61L000 1.7411000 11 x And alv.a w 1DMaWa l a w w0.0 aa,000 u, b,wo 109•aw 1w..... . in.. la 16 ewµ. a..111 0..16m s w.] 1. 915 $in nn uw in, 9u0 16 17 aiM.r ee agLLvu6ni gr.lalw m1s. 6.100 6.1w ].lw 8.1w 9.1w 11.100 1] x Ytia.ttl 06.i 6w IbS,Ow nn,Ow MB.900 61.114.9w 11.b1.w0 1.1666.000 IS a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a g a m031Si ebxLnO• ox0]9ICS 90. 13 I/]1I90 8S1SCov3 or eY03Ri9 CJtl1 IId ism 1 R9O4 59100 199o-as1 Imam t7 is9 i000 bii 1990-91 1191-92 m3-93 239306 192"s I s-T. Saul 190]-]000 10-Tut Said Lip uvtS1L 1®bl _- - 19 Yrt+at L 41tTca91 Iiu Wt Sul 1.]]5.000 111163,000 12r111,000 12,616,000 01191.000 "375,o00 0.75a.cm 9r]]6.000 19 91900• 20 turtuuctim ormu 3.000 3'am ].000 20 31 IWr ].3e0r000 3.]90,000 21510.000 2.940.000 2J70.000 12.6901000 16.090.000 b.160.000 u 22 NJ Asl 9uu 23 v vu� I9M 21 26 W9 as 4{aGltT slp.t6, 2e.000 6,000 10,0 9,000 5,000 I 56.000 62.090 10e,000 b Ilm]] fatYYt 6 W6bil{mY S9 ]]0.000 on... e7o,Om 938.000 1.O4 .000 6r413r000 ].1]9r000 32.357,000 ]s 2{ SOIIW 9Pb02 ].0]9.000 1,]19.eb 3.2291mo ],se].000 3.121.000 1]106].000 ]].981.000 41r0b.000 21 27 10bL 191ILUIJ 3019x{0 32.616.000 11.]]3.000 1e.5131000 u.i{1.000 17.620.000 26.442.000 ]L.T]6.000 ]0.12].000 s>Imlto9b b smt ai Jaut 901st u"om ]L9r000 ]]6.000 212.000 1]].000 I 1.374.000 411.000 1.718.000 is IS W{t21R C0119etlm OTtta• Cy -v units us,000 106.000 452.000 Y9.000 Y0.000 I 1.201.000 2r]]9.000 0r9L0.000 ]f ]0 Joivt lyltY `Us w 60s.000 11461.000 ],06{.000 1,]0].b0 1,207,000 7'u2'000 6.]]6.000 11.b9.000 10 11 SOI14 l]99mi]09b 1.261.000 2.266.b0 2.911.000 2,Y1.000 1.865.000 10.667.000 9,]39.000 s0,N6.000 31 22 L 4a]-vnl to Yat Tp 11ru1.000 1].326.000 ]3,6]6,OW 13.]9].900 Is.]]6,000 16.755.000 29.107.000 ]9.9s].WO u missal l] W99[vu 9 CtiiT-Ont rim Wt Y. 9.]]9.000 11.0]].000 12.506.000 1].131.000 lt.]b.000 91779.000 16.660.000 9r]]9.000 ].] 36 20I2L 9PY0< 3.532.000 ].9N.O0 6.317.000 e.]5],000 6.T9.W0 21,9311000 37,099.000 59,441.000 34 ]s P21L 1VL1iJ6G3 209➢LO 1].3]3.00 1s.N1.O0 16.6]].00 17.606.000 19.619.00 II,622,000 54,049,.0 69,2n.wo ]6 is ]gI2L 93PSSDli09ls 1,790.00 3.976.00 3.693.00 2.53"aw 31179.000 15.01.0O 23,223.000 31.L6.O0 36 ]] 9r9[vN 1 C{si7-Ott u 16rt Suc br032.0O 121O0"000 131131.000 11.360.00 b.6L0,0O 2s.N0.000 31.127.00 ]1.137.000 37 is gut iM['a 01T 269.00 ]60.00 626rO0 0]2.00 637.00 {67.00 1.761.000 1.7,1,. ]6 39 I0107 e3LMR M IOs910322 11.361.00 13.146,e00 12.705.0O 1].e20.000 0.6".O0 b.801.000 ]0,06.00 ]Or O6.000 39 60 CLgY Iu11S 9u1N.w Cm tfm F. $2,260 12.390 12.510 $2.660 $2.770 0.5m 60 91 Suam, at MllbO 0Nu 1'. 1.00 1,00 1,00 I'M 1.000 11 12 66t . 1� 12,3e0.000 12,S9a.000 t1.e10 . 62.6W.000 92,T0,000 63r640.000 42 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY P lTATIQN Ji� O a A U u� _ N Q `Since 195A .l �gNGE COUNT BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 1990-1991 FISCAL YEAR r CO W BANISA3ION DISMM NO. 14 6/20190 BDDO82 PBCOMO7NDATIONB page 1 1990-91 DIByAIC 914 BONNAAY APPAOVBD pPPR0V6D P8COM141tOPD m DBeCA MON OP ACC T yly BODGSy BODOBS BOD06S 1968-89 1989-90 1990-91 m PBODIA81ffi179� `y Oporatina A Capital AapAro ta: m Operatir4 F 1,136,000 841,000 1,233,000 c pital Facilities F0N 7,359,000 12,963,000 13,483,000 N n RDNIp830DR8 8,495,000 13,810,000 14,716,000 ® RMIND: e Omratim A Capital Favtim: e Ceah A Iimoatpenta )Ap priatea Peeocve6 snit Cerey-Over) 777,000 1,925,000 2,436,000 m O er Pe .q 1,718,000 11,865,000 12,200,000 �, y n p INO 8,495,000 13,810,000 14,716,000 u CWMTY eA1RTATIOM DISTRICT M. 14 Page 1 WMT BBCOIMEIMASIOxx 6/20/90 1990-91 PISCAL TnaR rd FORD 114 OPMPAax0 MBTIMATBD L ApPROv® APPROv® ACTUAL xRGWDWHD DBBDRIPTTON OR ACCOOAT TITLM BUWRT BDDOMT =mDITURBB BDDOBT 1988-69 1989-90 1989-90 1990-91 OPMPATM I Yn Dlrerenw' Pe 6,800 61500 7,100 7,SW Contractual Services ®ere oT J03M Operating 731,000 490,000 627,700 738,000 T1wt tlalnitennanlw 50,000 80,000 12,3W 40,ON NSW Station Maintenance 50,000 80,000 a,200 80,000 MaMolm Repairs 28,000 Inter-Dist ewer R Icm Charge 52,000 82,000 101,300 128,000 Permit and Ind.xastm Admin. 3,800 10,wo 9,000 10,OOo Ilgaauror'• investment Ad•. j A Banking Foam 28,on 2,ON 1,400 2,NO L Utilities 20,ON "'wo 29,700 40,000 Prorestla B icmm 8,000 2.NO 3,200 8,000 V Printing And Publication 1,wo 11000 1,000 crawl A xmstin9 - Dirmeton 1 ON 1.000 300 1 OOo L TOTAL OPBRATIx0 945,00 709 000 810 200 1 028 ow KOH-CE RTINO Vr Rrpaeses Appllvabls tO Prior Tmars 1 No 1,000 1 ON TOTAL xox-0P®ATL10 1 a" I'm 0 1,000 TOTAL OPMMATImO A ROM-OPBB8TIx0 946 NO 706 000 810 200 1 026 000 Apprepriatien for CWRinpeseies 190 ON 141 00d 207 NO TOTAL R88RRaB8 190 000 141.000 0 207.000 TOTAL RBWIDROmSB 1 136 000 847,000 810,200 1 233 000 Ila4 L II L OMM BARITATIOR 015MC M.11 Pa 2 BODfisr RSC010®OATIOBB 6/20/90 1990-91 ® Plilm all OPE3NTI50 �LLBIT® ,c APPAOM APPfOVED AL20N, RBGVO�� 068CRI W OR ACCOOM TITLB Boom HIIOG82 BSPB110ITOR88 BOOfislS 198 w 1969-90 1989-90 1990-91 v AVAIIABLB TOAOIRO C"h A lmvtaanta (Apprapriat" Raaa[vM Y10 carry-o a ) 587 000 409 000 524,400 35,000 0 a B A -----' (=) 521,000 423,000 49,000 1,189,000 m 22Raraat a B . P pu m 000 19,000 43,200 91000 BOB-yOSAL 549 000 442 000 92 200 1 198 000 a TOTAL A� y na 1 136 000 847 000 616 600 1 233 000 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.14 u BODGE2 R6C ENDATIONB 6/20/90 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR La' POND 114 CAPITAL FACILITIES ESTIMATED L APPROV® APPROVED ACTUAL RECa♦pOQlDSD DESCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE BODGBT BUDGET STPENDIMRSB BvD I r 1988-89 1989-90 1989-90 199"1 V PR=C" AND EXPBHDITORSS Sreataent Plant Expansion 5,537,000 5,845,000 3,528,000 5,761,000 r Hain Street Pmp Station 18,000 V Baker-Oialor Literceptor, 14-1-lA,B 1,340,000 4,483,000 3,342,000 5,930,000 Baker-Gisler Force Maine, 14-1-2 149,000 21100,000 1,482,000 L 6erNgaeka/Flood Dansgo Reserve 233,000 2851OD0 285,000 J Appropriation for District Pflr333tiee Improvezmnts and Sxtannions 100,000 250,000 25,000 TOTAL RBOUIRERMsTS 7,359,000 12,963,000 6,880,000 13,483,000 Ir AVAILABLE FUNDING L Caen A L stmenta 12,190,000 1,520,000 1,566,100 2,401,000 Lees: IRND Imeetment Depoeit 12,a00,000 y (Appropriated Reaervea ana Carry-over) 190,000 1,520,000 1,566,100 2,401,000 L Capital Facilities Assessment (IRND) 6,194,000 10,344,000 8,100,000 9,698,000 L Const.ctlon Grants, 160.000 156,000 110,000 56,000 Joint Works Equity Bale 475,000 530,000 468,000 535,000 L Bale of Capacity Rights 281,000 267,000 39,000 592,000 Interest and Mine. Receipt, 59,a00 146,000 180,200 181,D00 SUB-TOTAL 7,169,000 11,443,000 8,905,200 11;082,000 v TOTAL AVA BLR FUNDING 7,359,000 12,963,000 10,471,300 13,483,000 V k,+ ! 1 l [ ( l [ H 1 1 ( H ( I I [ I I I =XTY Ml An® O10112= b.l. 1120t90 MMW OF DISM T CQA W 0YRp1 PMM 2=6 , C.I.P. 1990-91 1111-92 1902-03 ION-90 199195 ; 0-Y. ft LL 1991-awe 10-Ym Sett !We-BIOLL 4KYePw[, 11-1-L.B • l 30rxatrw0 3.7211Ow 41M.wO •,000,000 4,w0,000 12,Ow,M 12,000,000 0WLi1.Le ftM WN.. t 1-x• x "Dool O Srw0.w0 1.600,w0 000,00 t •..,M 1,w0,000 IWe atawt M, MtM. a-1-1•• a 117101O00 10,ow w0,ow w0,0w i 1120010" e0,000 1,700,000 iLL.ellara,. Pael.et. x1e,M 25.00 29,0w :9,000 19,000 L,ow v1,ow 129,000 aw.ow olOw FLY 21,092,w0 3,742.00 01020.000 t,1a9,M e,laf,M u,000 ae,M ; 17,3201000 62e,00 17,100,M .......... 1 ....•... .....a.... .......... ........•. .......... .......... ; .see..... ..•....... ........... • P 1"ll autlN " SAM&" b. 1 1. IWbt-P%MmIl Will 1 n Mtly u mutrvttlm M OLttlet 0.. t 1. Xut.t-PlMm,l t•ellltlp OL.Mt1Y M1.t Mtfp .. IVHLLIY MM M Ol.ttltt Y.. ) a. Nutt-PInM f.Wlltlu .d,.M1M f. fwv.MiSw t,MM OASiY WI}i}i®OIB3YIC W. 16 6120/90 e}A} v 9m]2C090 06m rt 9m9 1 rlN Y 1M0-1911 f1YLD011 111 - oo LM 1990-91 1111-22 1b2-13 1"3d6 IM-10 a-T.] 1"h2m 10iu[ }eYl L2R ' WMSIM IOIm j 1 4u[v9[ L Y[gUry[ }[a W! Y[u 35,M 207,000 332,000 241,000 i0,000 2e.000 302.000 35'm 1 j BeYYOe � 1 Odn Of 1\ T.ISlau[1m 3 ] uY. (1MD) 1.L9.000 1.1171000 1.I10.000 11346,000 1.011,000 I 6,3e9,000 L 9.000 10.147'm 11,2i1.Om 3 8 In\eiu! i W[glluw[ 41®e .Om 1],000 L,000 30,Oo0 j OO,OOD U].Om 327.000 9 6 OWf Pwuu[ I 3 6 NLL MV11N} 1.1N,000 11173,000 1,101,WO 1.368,000 1,531.000 6.669.0m U.0111000 17,060.wo 6 7 fCRA4 1VAILWId 1W01N0 1.222,000 1,]6o.000 1.618,M 1.606.M 1,eW,000 61601.900 11.091.000 17.995,000 7 2>Y•41p11011}0 � 6 Oui'e e! J08" Y0t19 tl 6 O ]L.000 626,000 325,000 9e9.000 1,1]6,000 1.62).000 e,60].WO 11.111,GW e 9 m116a3241 ByeW N 1 O YY O2b[Ops[. ]M.000 ]]],OW 1]6,Ooo 36e,9m 163,000 j 1,8]6.000 3,0]].000 ],]12.000 9 10 30 11 A}LL YPiID)SfOue 1,026,000 1,116,0W 1,SW,000 1,]]6,W 1,410,000 6,202,000 10,866,Wo 17.016.000 11 m 0wrv[91 C[iry-0u[ K Yut V. 207.000 21i.000 201.W0 M91000 301.000 i 302.000 011,000 169,000 U .....0vev.. [[[........ [[[0[[.[[[[ ....v[e[[[. ........... j v.=........ ........... [vee....... fl fl [ E 9 fl fl fl fl 1 [ fl [ [ fl [ L I l m01RY SMITATlM DIOMM M0. 19 112.11. SY8281®Y W P2C=rro G01!IW Pye 2 Or. YBAPD 1990-1991 SMID01 1999-2ODD un 1990-91 1991-92 1192-92 L113-16 1994-98 5-Y. P041 1998-1OD0 10-YW TOW LIMB 6AP1YN.80®(9) 1] Wesvee A Ce[ry-we[ 7. L t Yeas 2,401,00 2.691.800 3p60.000 3.022.000 1.M310D 2,401,000 928.000 2.001.000 0 0608605 . - I 16 fxutsuetlm fence S6.W0 I $6.000 e6.000 16 M Pw: IM 1,698,000 15.794.000 10.891.NO 1.055.0M 3,197.000 1 62.627.000 7.221r00 50,411,00 15 16 B e8 Cye[StY Yyr4 102.000 e0.000 215,000 106.M0 111.OM j .1...An 1.L3.MD 2r29].OM 26 17 - IMewt I M 11. Inmu 101.000 229.00 260.000 152.010 ]9.DM j 882.006 IN.MD 110,61000 17 18 ONO[ 1. 565.00 551r0M S5l.ODD M 19 mh1 MW51N5 11.002.000 16.103.OM 1113001M0 ].]9e.000 3.]97.000 45,311.000 91091.OM 66.f95.OM SP 20 MAL AYA[wu P01D1Itl0 13.e83.000 10.800.M0 15.305.000 6.616.00 4,670.000 67.215.00 10,015,009 68.796.0M 20 21 N6101If0PY 21 22 Y o1 Jo1M 0o[G Reetaent P2eM 6.]61.OM 2.91.1.00 6.961.M0 5r100r000 3.7I1,000 29.456.M0 1,067.000 M.5'U.000 22 2] OLt[3[t M3IOOr. P. S.DIS.OM 7.125.00 5,125,000 25.0M 25.OM 17.221.OM 125,00 17.150.00 M 21 0Ne[ BgxWltupe M 25 fOO4 0P580I509M 10.786.000 15,040,000 12.086.000 S.1MAM 3.735.000 46,781.00 9.692, M 16.6]]rOM 29 26 We[vOs 5 Ces[Y-rns to NO. Year 2.697.004 ].]60.00 3.022.000 1.283.OM 934.000 136.00 323.00 323.000 26 .........m. .mmm...... ..m........ amvbmaa... ............ I m......... m..._a.... ........... 801pN8Y 27 0000. 6 4[tY-0.+i 2:'s Leet Ye.[ 2.436,000 2.9M.M0 3.991.000 ].26].OM 1.551.040 2.636.000 1.236.OM 2.6M.040 2] M mm OMM" 12r280.O0 17.176,000 12,551.000 1.7M.DM 6.915.00 51.7831000 20,172,000 71.155r040 M 29 'MM AYAI4 P010)IMO 16.716.000 20.180.00O 15.163.000 8.021.00 6.610.000 16.219.00 21.408.000 78.191,000 29 ]0 IOSAL QPZKP S 11.812.000 16.188.000 11.]80.000 6.469,000 5.234.000 I 51.983r000 ]O.5M.000 h.119.OM 30 31 Neerne 8 Grry r t0 Mart YN[ 2,206.0.0 3.991.MD 3,213.00 1,552.00 1,336.00 1.236.000 972.M0 --e73.000 31 32 Mert Yea .. 0" M[1M Pm5N9 Mrg011.0 I 32 33 POM MGMCS O9 (062ICI2) 2,904.00 3,992.00 3,263.00 1.513.000 1.2]6.M0 1.2]6.OM 872.000 --_872.000 31 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGETS oF°A°I e`t J oA so C� — Q O S+nce 1954 "9NGE COUNT 1990-1991 FISCAL YEAR ADOPTED JUNE 1371990 .. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS May 23, 1990 0 ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFOONIA L 109C EW5 AVE UE PO BOX eln FOUNTAINVAUE CAuw XNm9z)3e-91z] MEMORANDUM olm 9ez.zan ri .� To: Board of Directors From: Executive Committee r Subject: Summary Report and Recommendations re 1990-91 Joint Works Budgets (Personnel, Joint Operating Fund and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund) r Recommendation .. The Executive Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee's recommendation to adopt the enclosed 1990-91 Joint Works Personnel, Operating and Construction Budgets. Summary Report The accompanying budget documents provide detailed information concerning the proposed Joint Works budgets. The following discussion highlights and summarizes the recommendations for the three elements of the Joint Works budgets. Personnel (See Blue Report) New Positions Summary: Staff has previously advised the Directors that major treatment plant expansion underway and new program implementation to comply with changing regulatory requirements would require significant staffing increases to operate and •+ maintain .the new facilities and to support related activities and other required programs. Over the past five years we have completed and placed into service $62.2 million of new plant facilities and equipment. We currently have $106.5 million in new treatment plant facilities under construction that will have been completed and placed into service during the 1989-90 budget year; another $111. 1 million in treatment plant facilities that will be completed during the next few years; and $24.5 million in individual District .. facilities under construction. An additional $251.3 million in treatment facilities and $64.2- million in collection facilit,*.as are being designed and will be constructed and placed into service over the next several years. The 30-year Action-Pla: Master Plan adopted by the Boards last year projects capital improvements totalling $1.48 billion (in 1989 dollars) wider current NPDES permit conditions. � i u Page 2 This year our various departments requested 72 new positions. j The General Manager has reviewed those requests with the Department Beads and is recommending 55 new positions for 1990-91. Many of these positions will not be filled until later in the year, and some may not be filled at all in 1990-91 if L completion of construction projects is delayed. Two of the 55 positions are part-time, and four are to replace part-time positions being deleted. Summary of Proposed Additional Staffing Program/Svstem Position y Management „ Board Secretary 6 Support 2 Ii.JI Personnel 1 Finance L Accounting <1> Information Services 5 J Operations and Maintenance Sewage Collection Systems 4 General Plant and Equipment Maintenance 11 Treatment Plant Operations/Training 8 l ; Technical Services Regulatory Compliance (Air, Land, Water) 2 L Source Control Program 7 Process Monitoring and Laboratory 5 Engineering Facilities Planning and Design 5 Construction Management 6 L Total 55 The proposed new positions would raise the authorized staffing level from 571 to 626, an increase of approximately 9.6%. Annual Cost - - - - Based upon the anticipated need to fill the proposed new positions over the course of the next year, the recommendations would add IJ $1,960,630 or approximately 9.8%, to the estimated fiscal year 1990-91 salary budget. Employee benefits paid by the Districts including retirement, health, life, disability, workers' compensation II u r Page 3 r and unemployment insurance and uniforms would add approximately 30% to the salary totals. r Management Department - Board Secretary's Office: A Secretary position is proposed to r provide additional clerical support to the Board Secretary and to the General Manager on matters pertaining to the Boards of Directors' activities and official Districts' records. r - Management Support: An Office Aide position is recommended to be transferred from the Accounting Division to place all Office Aides in the same organizational unit. r - Personnel and Safety/Security: An additional Personnel Analyst is proposed for this division to provide additional office support r on employee matters for the expanding work force. Finance Department - Accounting: The Office Aide position is recommended to be transferred to the Management Support Group to place all Office r Aides in the same organizational unit. - Information Services: This new division has been effective in r reducing our reliance on consultants and is in constant demand for both hardware and software problem solving and for implementing new systems. Three Programmer positions are proposed to provide support for a new maintenance management system and implementation of a plant process monitoring and control system at Plant No. 1, and an additional Information Services Technician III is recommended to provide additional hardware support. A Senior Graphics Technician position is proposed to separate the division's secretarial work load from the expanded graphics and desktop publishing services. r Operations and Maintenance Department r - General Superintendent's Office: Reclassification of the Emergency Preparedness Coordinator to the Senior Engineer level is proposed to facilitate recruiting a suitable qualified r employee. An additional Engineer with experience in electrical power generation and distribution is proposed for the Central Power Generation Facilities now under construction. An Engineering Aide II position is. recommiended to replace an r Engineering Aide I to more properly reflect the expanded duties. An additional Senior Clerk position is proposed to provide support for the training section of the Operations Division. r u Page 4 II u - Plant Maintenance: Two Maintenance Field Supervisor positions I � are proposed to replace one Senior Foreman position to provide a L middle manager at each plant to better direct the leadmen and workers. Two Equipment Operator positions are proposed for deletion because of increasing use of private contractors in our off-site sludge reuse program. - Collection Facilities: Two Collection Facilities Field Supervisor positions are recommended: one for the trunk sewer maintenance group and one for the pump station maintenance group. This change will allow the down rating of two Collection Facilities Supervisor positions to Foreman positions. An " additional Senior Collection Facilities Worker and a Collection Facilities Worker II are proposed to round out existing and new crews. r - Mechanical Maintenance: Four Senior Mechanic, one Equipment Operator and two Mechanic positions are proposed to cover expanding work loads from major new facilities. .+ - Electrical Maintenance: One Lead Electrical Technician position is recommended to replace an electrical Technician I position to y provide better work force control and safer working conditions. - Instrumentation Maintenance: Because of increasingly L sophisticated controls and instruments in all new facilities, one each additional Instrument Technician II, Instrument Technician I and Instrument Maintenance Man positions are -I I. proposed. L - Plant Operations: An additional Shift Supervisor position is 11 proposed to provide additional process control supervision, to y oversee ongoing operational requirements and to assist with regulatory compliance. A Senior Plant Operator position is recommended to serve as the coordinator at Plant No. 1 between L major construction contractors and the ongoing treatment plant operational requirements. Nine Plant Operator positions are _ proposed to increase staffing during the non-daytime shifts and to expand the in-house training and retraining program. Four part-time Control Center Clerk positions are proposed to be deleted in favor of an additional full-time Control Center Clerk. V Technical Services Department I . - Director of Technical Services"Office: A new position, Air v Quality Manager is recommended to maintain agency wide coordination and effective responsiveness in a rapidly changing and growing regulatory arena. I.I - Compliance: One additional Senior Clerk position is proposed to provide clerical support to free the professional staff and to V assist the Division's Secretary. i r Page 5 - Laboratory: Four Lab Analyst positions are recommended to free ., four higher lever positions that have been bumped down and to staff the increased sampling program by the Source Control Division. One Clerk position is proposed to provide needed clerical support now being supplied by a Lab Helper who will be better utilized. - Source Control: An Associate Engineer position is proposed for the Special Projects Section to provide improved liaison and contract administration and an Assistant Engineer is proposed for the Permits Section to implement the recently revised industrial waste ordinance. Title changes are recommended for four positions, changing "Industrial Waste" to "Source Control" to more properly reflect the nature of the Divisions, work mission. One Source Control Inspector II and one Source Control Inspector I positions are proposed to increase the sampling effort. A Senior Clerk and two Part-Time Assistant positions are proposed to provide additional clerical support and data entry and to -� collect data for the industrial/commercial user fee program. Engineering Department - Planning and Design Management: An Engineer position is proposed to coordinate and review increasingly complex electrical and instrumentation design and an Associate Engineer position is proposed to assist in administering the many concurrent new projects under design and prepare them for �+ bidding. A Senior Engineering Aide, an Engineering Aide II and an Engineering Aide I positions are recommended to begin work on complete computerized composite drawings of the plants and to assist the professional staff with exhibits and drawings. - Construction Management: An Engineer position is proposed to provide ongoing project management services now provided by an outside consultant. A Principal Engineering Associate position is proposed for a new quality assurance and training section. One Senior Construction Inspector and two Construction Inspector r positions are needed to augment the inspection staff and to replace temporary employees. One entry level Engineering Aide I position is proposed to provide support to staff. Proiected Payroll Cost - The full employment payroll estimate is $29.5 million, but we expect to realize a payroll savings of approximately 10; due to personnel turnover, delays in filling new positions, tight control over hiring activities, temporary adjustments.Jn plant operation schedules and procedures to minimize staffing, and delays in major construction schedules. Our total payroll cost r, is therefore targeted at $26.3 million. r ) ' r Page 6 i L - Net payroll and benefits, after chargeouts to CORF and the Iy Districts, account for approximately 38% of the total budgeted W Joint Operating Costs. - The actual payroll savings may be affected by pending ) � classification studies and the meet-and-confer process this fall L+ when the current three-year Memoranda of Understanding expire, as there are no provisions in the budget for any changes that might be forthcoming. Any proposed changes will be considered by the full Board prior to implementation. Joint Operating Budget - JO (See Green Report) L The $47.6 million Joint operating budget finances the operating and v maintenance costs of the joint treatment works and the joint administrative activities. The major factors that are causing increases in our Joint Works �+ operating and maintenance costs include: - Regulatory Reguirements: More stringent air pollution control Id requirements mandated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) for control and reduction of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) , oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and oxides of sulfur (SOx) r emissions, resulting in higher operational costs to remove pollutants from the digester gas produced in our treatment plants and control emissions from our digester gas fired engines. Vi - Increased costs for engineering, monitoring, enforcement, outside and in-house laboratory services and special project i ' activities carried out by the Compliance, Laboratory and Source hw Control staffs to comply with the ocean monitoring and pretreatment program provisions of our NPDES permit as well as our AQMD permit requirements. Li - Increased costs for use of higher volumes of chemicals such as ferric chloride and anionic polymer used in our physical/ chemical treatment systems to improve solids removal b efficiencies as required to maintain compliance with the discharge limits set forth in our NPDES permit. v - Sludge Disposal: The closure of the Coyote Canyon landfill with no replacement for sludge disposal, as well as increased cost ) for hauling and disposal in a privat= landfill of waste activated sludge and grit and screenings which the- Regional Water Quality Control Board has determined cannot be disposed of at a municipal landfill; and higher costs for private reuse alternatives to landfill disposal. - Odor Control: Increased chemical usage for expanded odor control program including 20 new foul air scrubbers as well as Ir increases in the unit cost of caustic soda. r Page 7 r Repairs and Maintenance: Increased maintenance and repair r activities throughout the Districts' expanded and upgraded treatment facilities. Comparison with 1989-90 Budget: The accompanying excerpt from Schedule A of the Joint Operating Budget (Green Report) highlights the comparisons between the proposed 1990-91 budget and last year's budget and. also summarizes the reasons for the increases (and decreases) by major budget category. Increase Over 1989-90 Budget: The $3.1 million increase is 6.9% over the 1989-90 budget. Of this, 3.9% (or more than 56% of the increase) is directly attributable to regulatory mandates such as improved wastewater treatment and AQMD regulations requiring significant improvements in control of air emissions, and increased costs for chemicals, as well as the ocean monitoring, pretreatment and toxics control requirements set forth in our NPDES permit. The remaining portion of the increase, or about 3.0% (43% of the increase) is due to inflation related increases in the costs of operating and maintaining expanded facilities and to accommodate additional flows into our treatment facilities. r Self-Funded Insurance Plans The Districts have been self insured for several types of coverage for the past several years as a result of Fiscal Policy Committee recommendations that were implemented by the Joint Boards of Directors. Workers' Compensation and Public Liabilitv r - The Workers' Compensation and Public Liability plans have been in existence since 1979. - The savings realized through these self insured plans plus in-lieu premiums deposited and interest earnings on the reserves in these funds have resulted in a current reserve level of $2.6 million, compared to the original $500,000 " reserve level set by the Boards when the plans were established. The Committee recommends that the reserve level proposed for 1990-91 for the Workers' Compensation fund and r the fully self-insured Public Liability Fund be maintained at the current levels. - An appropriation of $155,000 for in-lieu premium contributions by the Districts is recommended in the Workers' Compensation Fund to maintain the existing reserve level at $696,000. - A $265,000 appropriation has been included in the Public Liability Fund for excess loss insurance in the event the availability of .this coverage makes it desirable to the Directors. 6d Page 8 - The Fiscal Policy Committee is again recommending that the � I Boards of the individual Districts continue the practice of y setting aside reserve funds to partially cover deductible levels for the Districts' all-risk property insurance coverage. The reserves are recommended to be maintained at 11 the $5 million level for 1990-91. 6" Health Plan Ytl - The self-funded Employee Health Plan has also been in existence since 1979. Our claims experience in 1989-90 appears to indicate that the cost containment provisions , I enacted in 1984, which include both increased deductible requirements and co-payment levels, have been somewhat effective in helping to stabilize our claims levels on a per-employee basis. Although total costs have increased in response to continuing increases in the total numbers of active employees, their dependents, and retired employees participating in the plan, the cost per employee covered hasW decreased. - These increased total medical care costs required transfers ! � into this fund during the past year over and above the anticipated premiums. However, we have partially recovered some of these expenditures from increased premiums paid by employees for family coverage. Staff expects that the increased Districts' and employees' contribution level authorized by the Boards during approval of the salary and benefits agreements negotiated with the employee groups in 1987-88 will also reduce any required transfers in 1990-91. We expect these changes, and new cost containment provisions that are also included, will enable this fund to be more ! I nearly self supporting by the end of the three year MOU period. Budgeted District premiums are equal to premiums approved for the HMO plans. V - During 1989-90 the Directors opted to purchase both short and long-term disability insurance and thus no budget has been I , allocated for these claims. Premiums are budgeted in the 61 Joint Operating Fund. CORF Budget (See Yellow Report) u The $103.4 million Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF) Budget finances the construction of the Joint Treatment Works Facilities. It includes major and minor projects which have generally been previously presented to the Boards for review as part of the Master Plan and/or agenda process. Any project under $15,000 requires .. - informal bidding. Projects over $15,000 require formal bidding,'.: u and any projects over $25,000 require Board approval in accordance - with District procurement regulations. The budget is prepared under assumptions included in the 30-year Master Plan approved last I ' July by the Directors. 6+ Ir r Page 9 r - Source of Funds: The budget will be financed from existing capital funds accumulated in the individual Districts' Capital Facilities Funds, proceeds from the 1986 sale of Certificates of Participation, new connection fees, limited Federal and State grant funds and from new borrowing to be approved by the r Directors. - Master-Planned Projects: The 1990-91 CORP requirements total $103,422,000, an increase of $697,000 over 1989-90. The budget includes funds for several major master-planned projects, including completing the construction of the central power generation facilities at both plants, additional primary treatment and sludge handling facilities at Plant 1, expansion of the administration building and the construction of a new central laboratory. r - Project Categorization: Schedule B-2 entitled Classification of Budgeted Projects by Revenue Program Categories classifies all the proposed 1990-91 capital outlay projects into three categories to assist the Directors in evaluating the need for the proposed levels of expenditures. These categories are: -� - Replacement/Reconstruction Proiects - These projects are required to replace or rehabilitate aging or deteriorated equipment or structures. .r - Improvement/Upgrade Proiects - These projects are mandated by various regulatory agencies, including the EPA, State Regional Water Quality Control Boards, South Coast Air " Quality Management District, and other local agencies. - Additional Capacity/Increased Hydraulic Requirements Projects - These projects are required to accommodate increase hydraulic requirements (additional flows) that the Joint Works facilities must process and dispose of over the ., next five to ten years, as identified in the latest Joint Works Master Plan. The $103,422,000 in proposed CORP projects is allocated to " these three categories as follows: Project Category 1990-91 Budget Allocation r Replacement/Reconstruction $ 28,801,000 Improvement/Upgrade 12,367,000 ,., Increased Hydraulic Requirements 62 ,254 ,000 Total 1990-91 CORF Budget Request $103,422,000 r The staff is available to answer any questions from the Directors. If you desire additional information before the meeting, please contact Wayne Sylvester or Gary Streed at (714 ) 962-2411. l ( ( ( [ l ( [ l t [ l l l l l l ( / SUED=a 5/25/90 199E-91 JOIMf OP6MTINE FIRD BODGBx 6pIdA11Y oP ipPL6SiDp...P.... a.. pP Tun AEDE92 PgEDIgB1DDR8 (A) (8) ICI ID) M le1 I... Due x0 four. Due ra Intel 'ajar Budget I909-90 90-91 Butlget Iefletion/ R."letoty gma®mded Wjot .e .. for Raa®setled Cetee Rudest_ a .d6d 8toeneion Mandates ev/. I. But.:star $17,667,000 $19,206,0D0 $)20,000 $W9,000 $1,599,000 •8tpmt to m1o41n smoq,loyment level uupp t090\ot Mega and ecla thorlred poAti , 55 adcU eal poei- Aemflt. [Save will M phased in[Poor the y izaerily to rarappor nni%repmpee�re regair In.tg, ends[era feltaeer goelity mnnitoring .galpment and manage mjor .attention projmce. 2. Wor Control 6 5,687,000 5,6)D,a00 <17.000> <17,000 Ian..... purpose/R..... for Chamimi flpOptPdy ..1 farts... mavra.ea Coagulants Chlorine $270,000 To [emals level. Caustic Oode <255,880> used Is foul aft (.odlvo a [Weer. and trunk Hydr tid.1 Ilea. to—.trot hydrogen sulfide build.,. Pactaus 25,000> Control.sulfide. Chloride in digester gas (AO*)R.I. 431.11. Part... <76.880> ehy.tcallohemlcal Chloride trestmet to. alu"!=ssrome mm Also usd for .vlfld. neutral. Palyrt. $69.800 Dseq.Smrm...an flow Smraaee.. '911.Yeo> 3. Ptef...I ..1 1,850,000 3,194,000 3SO,000 906.00E 1,314.000 • one, confront for plant painting. Soreleesrac[ • Al. eml....i... ....ultenLe�[ legal eervle0e. 6. Solids Removal 5,500,000 61000,000 )00,000 200.00E 600,080 • 1....... I. disposal are fe[ ptivate .ad Disposal' se/disposal optrove u a result of Ina.... xssMutt... and Coyote Co.". e10vo[e. 5. Bqulpmevt 200,000 245,000 65,000 65,000 • mete... In use of hmvy ...lpmnt. Charg6a 6. Pepelre/ 3,765,000 3,795,000 30,00E 30,000 .Page, itlandu gradeongoing�mi1lt �mid foree� l Mai tvnmaa/ Servlee. equipment. Supplies ). Reeeerah and 2,070,000 2.694,000 80,000 511,000 624,000 • Atldltla.el monitoring xequfted. m.itnring B. utilities 7.220,000 6,345,000 <075,000> <075,000> Cmrm..Av to off look on., a.Porivee.lch nw equipment. 9. Other 2,602,000 2,978,D00 100,000 276,000 376,000 • Im[eaee to support'lamed cleft end equipment xeterlals, addition.. Supplies .Use a[cwnt far 2j60 penalties and operating free. 10. sbtel Joint $46,561,000 $50,207,000 $1,608,000. $2,016,000 $3,626,000 Operetlnq Hzpevsae 11. Rove.uec and 2,050,000 2,600,000 273,008 275,000 53e,000 .[feet. 12. pet Joint $40,531,000 $6).60].000 $1,233.000 $1,763,000 $3,076,000 Operating SC®[II,E I JOINT OPERATING FUND BUDGET RBVIEWW & SUMMARY 5/11/90 COMPARISON OF BUDGETED & ACTML EXPENDITURES & ESTIMATED CARRY-OVER FISCAL YEAR 1989-90 (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) . Budget Reccunended Increase Expenditures Estimated Increase Est'd Carry- 1989-90 Budget or 1988-89 Expenditar or Over to Fiscal 1990-91 (Decrease) 1989-90 (Decreasel Year 1990-91 1. Net Salaries, Wages & Benefits $17,687,000 $19,286,000 $1,599,000 $13,454,000 $16,157,000 $2,703,000 $1,530,000 2. Odor Control & Chemical Coagulants 5,687,000 5,670,000 <17,000 4,594,000 4,648,000 54,000 1,039,000 3. Professional & Contract Services 7,350,000 9,194,000 1,844,000 5,646,000 6,496,000 850,000 854,000 4. Equipm t Charges 200,000 245,000 45,000 185,000 215,000 30,000 <15,000> 5. Repair & Maintenance Materials & Services 3,765,000 3,795,000 30,000 3,313,000 3,361,000 48,000 404,000 6. Research & Monitoring 2,070,000 2,694,000 624,000 2,511,000 2,040,000 <471,000> 30,000 7. Utilities 7,220,000 6,345,000 . <875,000 4,884,000 5,051,000 167,000 2,169,000 8. Other Materials, Supplies & Outside Services 2,602,000 2,978,000 376.000 2,370,000 2,545,000 175,000 57,000 9. Total Joint Operating Expenses $46,581,000 $50,207,000 $3,626,000 $36,957,000 $40,513,000 $3,556,000 $6,068,000 10. Revenue and Offsets 2,050,000 2,600,000 550,000 2,461,000 2,700,000 239,000 <650 000> 11. Net Joint Operating $44 531 000 $47,607,000 $3,076.000 $34,496,000 $37,813,000 $3,317,000 $6,718,000 [ [ Schedule II BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 6/28/90 JOINT OPERATING FUND Fiscal Year 1990-91 ALLOCATION OF JOINT OPERATING EXPENDITURES (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) GALLONAGE FLOWS 1990-91 FUNDING 1989-90 COMPARISON I 1989-90 Estimated Estimated District Flows Estimated 1990-91 Percent District Estimated Required District Required No. (Past Year) Increase Flows of Total Contribution Carryover Funding Contribution Funding 1 I 9,897.14 MG 236.45 MG 10,133.60 MG 10.20% $ 4,854,000 $ 684,900 $ 4,169,100 $ 4,092,000 $ 3,692,000 2 I 30,781.43' 389.37 31,170.80 31.35% 14,931,000 2,106,900 12,824,100 14,232,000 12,841,000 3 31,183.12 333.88 31,517.00 i 31.71% 15,096,000 2,130,300 12,965,700 14,157,000 12,773,000 5 4,808.58 152.22 4,960.80 4.99% 2,376,000 335,300I 2,040,700 2,026,000 1,828,0001 6 5,563.76 10.74 5,574.50 I 5.61% 2,670,000 376,800 2,293,200 2,587,000 21334,000 7 7,392.88 289.62 7,682.50 7.73% 3,680,000 519,300I 3,160,700 3,638,000 3,282,000 11 I 6,167.47 53.33 6,210.80 - 6.25% . 2,975,000 419,800 2,555,200 3,175,000 2,865,000, 13 i 466.10 175.40 641.50 0.65% 307,000 43,400 263,600 134,000 121,000 14 1 1,624.27 (124.87) 1,499.40 1.51% 718,000 101,300 616,7001 490,000 442,000 ' 1 I TOTAL 97,874.75 MG 1,516.15 MG 99 390.90 MG j 100.00% i i $ 47,607,000 $ 6,718,0001 $ 40,889,0001 I $ 44,531,000 $ 40,178_0001 c__ _ .__- r JOINT NORRS OPERATING BUDGET SCHEDULE III JOINT OPERATING 6 WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS 5/11/90 r 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR 1987-80 1988.89 1989-90 1989-90 1990-91 r ACTUAL ACTUAL PROJECTED BUDGET RECOMMEND ________________________________________________________________ 1. SALARIES 6 MAGES 13,149,700 14,574,663 17,456,000 18,530,000 21,229,000 (a) ................................................................ 2. RETIREMENT 2,191,366 1,941,706 2,496,000 3,384,000 3,035,000 (a) 3. WINNERS COMP .186,000 134,000 155,000 155,000 155,000 (a) 4. UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 15,855 61155 25,000 25,000 25.000 (a) S. GROUP INSURANCE 1,276,752 1,193,544 1,623,000 1.509,000 1,758,000 (a) 6. UNIFORM RENTAL 51,497 69,191 74,000 84,000 84,000 (al ................................................................ 7. _TOTAL BENEFITS 3,721,470 3,364,5% 4,373,000 5,157,000 5,057,000 (a) r S. SALARIES, WAGES, 6 BENEFITS 16,871,170 17,939,259 21,829,000 23,687.000 26,286,000 r 9. DIRECT CHARGES-CORF/GIST (2,249,%0) (2,652,330) (3,172,000) (3,50 .000) (4,000.000) 10. COST ALLOC-CORF/DIST (1,791,523) (1,S32,420) (2,500,000) (2,500,000) (3,000,000) ................................................................ .. 11. N.O. SALARIES 6 BENEFITS (4,041,483) (4,484,900) (5,672,000) (6,000,0001 (7,000,000) (b) . ............................................................. 12. NET J.O. PAYROLL 12,829,697 13,454,459 16,157,000 17,687,000 19,286,000 (c) --.-...__._---------------------------------------------------- '� 13. MATERIALS, SUPPLIES, 6 SERVICES _______________________________ 14. GASOLINE, DIESEL 6 OIL 203,102 220,292 215,000 250,000 250,000 (d) r 15. INSURANCE 857,352 50,131 585,000 600,000 600,000 (e) 16. MEMBERSHIPS 14,742 15,580 25,000 30,000 30,000 (7) 17. OFFICE EXPENSE r 18. SUPPLIES 96,092 92,067 100,000 110,000 120,000 (g) 19. OTHER 49,510 61,795 75,000 55,000 65,000 (9) r 10. OPERATING SUPPLIES 21. CHLORINE 6 ODOR CONTROL 1,804,810 1,966,235 1,995,000 2,100,000 2,400,000 (h) r 22. SULFIDE CONTROL 605,154 565,403 618,000 1,000,000 900,000 (h) .,, 23. CHEMICAL COAGULANTS 1,833.150 2,062,688 2,035,000 2,587,000 2,370,000 (1) 24. LAB CHEMICALS 6 SUPPLIES 83,529 138,529 100,000 140,000 186.000 (j) 25. TOOLS 75,943 02,419 70,000 85,000 95,000 (j) 26. SOLVENTS, PAINTS, 6 JAN. SUPPLIES 94,562 99,518 120,000 150,000 150,000 (j) 27. OTHER OPERATING SUPPLIES 198,576 153,105 184,000 200,000 215,000 (j) r ) I JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET SCHEDULE III JOINT OPERATING 6 WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS 5/11/90 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR 1987-92 1988-89 1989-90 1989-90 1990-91 '`{I ACTUAL ACTUAL PROJECTED BUDGET RECOMMEND --- ---------------------------------------------------- { 1 28. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 29. GAOUNDSNEEPING 42,975 44,618 65,000 100,000 125,000 (k) r( 30. OUTSIDE LAB SERVICES 95,903 115,711 80,000 400,000 404,000 (k) 31. SOLIDS REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL 2,767,538 4,653,931 5,200,000 5,500,ODD 6,000,000 (k) 4i1 32. OTHER WASTE DISPOSAL 25,910 25,236 2B4O00 185,000 190,000 (k) ) V 33. OXYGEN PLANT $PER B MTCE 0 0 180,000 400,000 420,000 (k) 3/. OTHER 210,111 273,391 213,000 235,000 718,000 (k) 35. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES , 36. GENERAL, LABOR 6 SPECIAL COUNSEL 267,486 326,028 395,000 275,000 650,000 (1) L 37. AUDIT 6 ACCOUNTING 19,978 22,621 25,000 25,000 27,000 (1) j 38. ENGINEERING 39,201 8,237 30,000 50,000 75,000 (1) 'Lr' 39. OTHER 139,833 175,696 220,000 180,000 525,000 (1) L 40. PAINTING B PUBLICATION 41. REPRO-IN-HOUSE _ 76,543 95,683 110,000 100,000 140,000 (m) 42. PRINTING-OUTSIDE 49,214 28,247 60,000 50,000 100,000 (t•) 1 4�! 45. PHOTO PROCESSING 19,773 15,887 22,000 20,000 25,D00 (�) 1 � 44. NOTICES 6 ADS 26,243 54,284 75,000 75,000 85,000 (o) V! 45. RENTS 6 LEASES I 46. OUTSIDE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 63,645 71,237 100,000 100,000 120,000 47. DISTRICT EQUIPMENT RENTAL 105,864 113,972 115,OD0 100,000 125,000 48, REPAIRS 6 MAINTENANCE ILI 49. MATERIALS 2,755,442 3,241,500 3,211.000 3,600,000 3,600,000 (0) y 50. CONTRACTS 123,602 71,767 150,000 165,000 195,000 (0) t i 51. RESEARCH 6 MONITORING L 52. OCEAN MONITORING 1,759,596 2,314,126 1,700,000 1,700,000 2,104,900 (P) 53. OCEAN/I.N./OPER RESEARCH 194,303 196,524 340,000 370,000 590,000 (P) Y 11 Yd JOINT NORMS OPERATING BUDGET SCHEDULE III - JOINT OPERATING 6 MORNING CAPITAL FUNDS 5111(90 r 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR - - 1987-06 1988-89 1909-90 1989-90 1990-91 ACTUAL ACTUAL PROJECTED BUDGET RECOMMEND .. -------------------------------------------_____________________ 54. TRAINING, MEETINGS, 6 TRAVEL 58,854 82,074 124,000 125,000 175,000 (9) 55. UNCOLLECTABLE ACCOUNTS 0 257 0 2,000 2,000 (r) 56. UTILITIES 57. DIESEL FOR GENERATORS 116,270 107,911 90,000 200,000 200,000 (s) 58. POWER 3,593,300 4,446,142 4,641,000 6.500,000 5,700,000 (s) 59. NATURAL GAS 113,916 123,930 100,000 250,000 175,000 (s) r 60. TELEPHONE 105,982 103,351 100,000 120,000 120,000 (s) 61. WATER 92,332 102,160 120,000 150,000 150,000 (s) 62. OTHER EXPENSES 63. FREIGHT 35,491 41,283 40,000 40,000 45,000 (t) r 6/. GENERAL 221,745 111,921 180,000 225,000 300,000 (t) 65. AOMD OPERATING FEES 0 67,330 210,000 250,000 300,000 (t) .. 66. PRIOR YEARS EXPENSE 15,546 250,618 30,000 50,000 50,000 (u) .+- 67. OTHER NON-OPERATING EXPENSE 41,805 46,411 40,000 45,000 45,000 (V) ..................----.__-----------------____--____--_-__-- 66. TOTAL MATL, SUPPLIES, 6 SERVICES 19,514,916 23,502,855 24,356,000 26,894,000 30,921,000 r 69. COST ALLOCATION-CORF 6 OTHER (289,277) (358,098) (500,000) (350,000) (600,000) (�) -----------____________________________ 70. NET J.O. NAT'L, SUPPLIES, 6 SERV 19,225,639 23,144,7S7 23,856,000 29,544,000 30,321,000 (W) r 71. REVENUE (1,482,319) (2,103,387) (2,200,000) (1,700,000) (2,000,000) (y) ...................................._.__.............._..... ,r 72. NET J.O. EXPENDITURES 30,573,007 34,495.829 37,013,000 44,S31,000 47,607,000 (z) .r r May 11, 1990 SCHEDULE IV NOTES TO JOINT OPERATING FUND BUDGET 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR (a) Salaries, Wages and Benefits - See attached Schedule V for 1990-91 salaries and benefits estimates and projected payroll savings. Estimated 1989-90 salaries and benefits are below budget primarily because delayed construction schedules allowed positions to remain vacant. .. (b) Cost Allocations and Direct Chargebacks to CORF and Individual Districts - Represents direct labor and benefits chargebacks and cost allocation to the appropriate fund for which the work is actually performed (CORP for work on - treatment plants' capital expansion; respective Capital Facilities funds for work on individual District's collection facilities capital expansion; and Operating funds for maintenance and repair) . Also reflects administrative time chargeable to self-funded insurance programs; and Source �+ Control Division and Laboratory Division charges to respective _ Districts for industrial waste monitoring and enforcement program. .. (c) Net JO Payroll - This line item represents the net salaries, wages and benefits chargeable to Joint Operating Fund for administration and maintenance/operation of the joint works facilities, after chargebacks to 'other funds for services performed by the labor pool described above in (b) . (d) Gasoline, Oil and Fuel - This account includes gasoline, oil _ and diesel fuel required to operate stationary treatment plant equipment as well as approximately 300 pieces of major mobile equipment such as vehicles, cranes, etc. (a) Insurance - Includes Board and staff out-of-county travel policy, employee fidelity bond, all-risk (earthquake and flood) policy, fire, boiler and machinery policies. The major elements of this account are $323,000 for $35 million in coverage provided by the comprehensive all-risk policy and $258,000 for in-lieu premiums to increase the reserve levels _ in the self-insured public liability fund pursuant to the Boards' decision to fully self-insure liability risk. `r (f) Memberships - Districts' memberships in Association of - - Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) , California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA) , Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency (SARFPA) , and Long Beach Safety Council. (g) Office Expense - This account includes supplies, forms, small office equipment, drafting materials; technical journals and postage for all departments. I ' r Schedule IV I � Page 2 (h) Chlorine & Odor Control Chemicals - The Districts presently use chlorine, and sodium hydroxide (caustic soda) as primary odor control chemicals in the treatment plants. Usage of it chlorine is expected to remain at 1989-90 levels during the year but unit prices have increased. Caustic soda use in the foul air scrubbers at both plants however, is expected to increase over 50% as new scrubbers are placed into service. Caustic soda is also added to trunklines to control hydrogen sulfide in the lines, and $237,000 has been added to the chemical budget for the Joint Works' share of this expense for the in ! plant odor control benefits. re Ferrous chloride use, required to control hydrogen sulfide I ' levels in our digester gas as required by AQMD Rule 431.1, L will decrease by slightly, partially as a result of increased ferric chloride for physical/chemical treatment. it During the course of this year, we expect to optimize use of the various odor control chemicals, but expect our overall usage levels and budget requirements to remain high as we � I maintain compliance with increasingly stringent air quality W regulations. l (i) Chemical Coagulants - We expect that the increased polymer � usage level increase in 1990-91 result in a increase of $69,000 for the material. Polymer is added to the influent wastewater along with ferric chloride via the physical/ L chemical treatment systems at both plants to improve solids removal efficiencies in the primary clarifier basins. It is also added to digested sludge prior to dewatering to cause the ? ! sludge to coagulate to improve the sludge and water separation +.! process. I � Ferric chloride is used as a backup chemical in the event the primary chemical distribution systems are out of service for repairs or maintenance, but primarily for enhanced primary , . physical/chemical clarifier performance. Physical/chemical � I treatment systems were fully installed and operational at both plants this past year, and we expect to decrease our budgeted use of ferric chloride in these systems by $76,000. A portion of ferric chloride costs are included in the odor control chemical category to account for this additional benefit from its use. V (j ) Other Operating Suoo11@a - Miscellaneous items such as sc.tubber acids, activated carbon, solvents, cleaners, I ( hardware, janitorial supplies, tools, laboratory supplies, v etc. required to operate and maintain existing and expanding facilities. L' I I fr r Schedule IV r Page 3 `+ (k) Contractual Services - The major component of this category is sludge removal and disposal. Contracts have been executed -, with Recyc Inc. , Pima Gro and Curti Enterprise for agricultural reuse of residual solids. The Coyote Canyon landfill was closed this past year and no replacement site - - has yet been approved within the county. A total of $6 million has been budgeted for solids removal and disposal. r This account also includes appropriations for groundskeeping services, toxics removal services, outside laboratory r services, trash pickup, plant site sweeping, data processing system maintenance and support services, and temporary help to level out periodic increases in staff workload and staffing levels. A maintenance and operations contract was implemented in February for the Plant 2 oxygen generation plant and $420,000 has been budgeted for that service contract. (1) Professional Services - Includes General Counsel, special labor counsel, CPA audit and miscellaneous accounting, .+ data processing, engineering and other consulting services. (m) Printing and Publications - Budget allows for in-house and outside reproduction costs and reflects expanded management information system and increasingly complex administrative requirements, as well as continuing demand by public and regulatory agencies for information on Districts' activities. The continuing efforts of our Public Information Officer (PIO) to improve our public education program on Districts' activities is also reflected in the increased budget for this r line item. This account also includes costs of advertisements and notices in our continuing effort to recruit quality staff to meet master planned objectives.. (n) Rents and Leases - This account includes cost accounting system charges to the Joint Operating Fund for Districts-owned equipment, and outside equipment rental for major equipment used for emergency repairs. The 1990-91 allocation has been _ increased slightly to reflect the increased usage levels of large equipment required over the past four years to r support major repairs and maintenance in our upgraded and expanded facilities. (o) Repairs and Maintenance - This item, which is for parts and services for repair of plant facilities, reflects an ' authorization to allow for routine equipment maintenance. Should this level allocation prove to be insufficient in the event of major unexpected equipment failures and/or repairs, a transfer from the unappropriated reserves of the individual Districts would be necessary to meet .the increased obligation. r Ir 4 Schedule Iv Page 4 Ytl (p) Research and Monitoring - $2,000,000 in this account is for Ir contract services to carry out the extensive ocean monitoring program required by EPA Region IX under the provisions of the Districts' NPDES permit, which became effective April 1, 1985. The account includes the Districts' contribution to the r Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) being conducted under a joint powers agreement with other Southern California municipal dischargers, and also provides r for some operational research and evaluation to develop optimum operating parameters in the treatment plants. r (q) Training, Meetings and Travel - Expanding activities of regulatory agencies have required increased Board member and 1 staff travel in recent years. It is expected that considerable travel will continue to be required in connection with our continued efforts to obtain an extension of our NPDES permit conditions. Also includes ongoing technical j ! training and materials for staff, expansion of our supervisory ++ training program to help provide supervisors with the necessary training to more effectively manage their Divisional groups, and required training for new computerized control y systems and other "high tech" equipment. (r) Uncollectible Accounts - For miscellaneous accounts that are It determined by the General Counsel and Director of Finance to be uncollectible. (s) Utilities - The $5.7 million allocation for purchased power in this item reflects an $800, 000 decrease from 1989-90 budgeted levels due to lower than anticipated requirements of additional 7 � air scrubbers, electric motors at the new Ocean Outfall Booster 4M1 Station, and avoidance of peak-demand hours for electrical equipment. (t) Other Operating Expenses - Expenses not chargeable elsewhere, such as freight and miscellaneous items, and annual permit renewal fees and penalties assessed by the SCAQMD. r (u) Expenses Applicable to Prior Years - Represents adjustments to an operating or non-operating account balance from previous It years. r (v) Other Non-Operating Expenses - Miscellaneous items not ' 1 chargeable elsewhere. r (w) Cost Allocation and Direct Chargebacks to CORP and Individual ) � Districts - For materials, supplies and services cost allocation and chargebarks for same purposes as described w above under (b) . 11 VI Schedule IV Page 5 (x) Net JO Materials. Supplies and Services - This line item represents the net materials, supplies and services chargeable to the Joint Operating Fund for administration and maintenance .. and operation of the Joint Works Facilities, after chargebacks to other funds. (y) Net Revenues - Budget amount is for sales of various sewage treatment process by-products, revenues from the wastehauler disposal facilities at Plant No. 1, sampling chargebacks to individual Districts, and miscellaneous items. r (z) Net JO Requirements - This line item represents the net Joint Operating Requirements after reduction of the Total Joint ,r Operating Requirements by the revenues generated from sale of by-products, charges to other agencies, and other - miscellaneous operating revenues. r r .r .y r r v N r r JOINT OPERATING FUND Schedule V (AND WORKING CAPITAL REVOLVING FUND) 5/11/90 PROJECTED SALARIES & BENEFITS 1990-91 Anticipated ,m At Full Payroll Recommended Employment savings Budget d SALARIES & WAGES 23,853,000 2,624,000 21,229,000 ! 1 . . BENEFITS: 1. Retirement 3,410,000 375,000 3,035,000 (2a 2. Workers' Compensation 155,000 -0- 155,000 (2b 3. Unemployment Insurance 25,000 -0- 25,000 (2c 4. Group Medical - Self-Funded (includes 1,405,000 141,000 1,264,000 (2d transfers) - HMO 403,000 40,000 363,000 - Disability 81,000 8,000 73,000 - Life 64,000 6,000 58,000 .., 5. Uniforms 92,000 8,000 84,000 (2e 6. Total Benefits 5,635,000 578,000 5,057,000 TOTAL SALARIES, 29,488,000 3,202,000 26,286,000 . .WAGES & BENEFITS NOTES: 1) Salaries & Wages - Full employment projection based on the assumption that all 626 authorized permanent positions and the 44 Summer Work Program positions are filled as set forth in the personnel recommendations. Because of our ability to sometimes temporarily m minimize staffing by adjusting plant operational modes, personnel turnover and strict controls on filling vacancies, we have targeted our payroll cost at $26.3 million next year (10.9% over the 1989-90 budget) which will realize a payroll savings of $3,202,000. If', however, turnover and vacancies are lower, it may be necessary to . allocate additional funds from the unappropriated reserve accounts of the individual Districts. 2 ) Benefits - Remarks above under Salaries and Wages regarding fuli r employment of authorized positions also apply to benefits. (a) Retirement - The Districts' employees are members of the Orange County Employees Retirement System pursuant to our MOU's. w SCHEDULE V ) f Page 2 r 1 : (b) Workers' Compensation - Amount includes total estimated L expenditures for the workers ' compensation program set forth in detail in the enclosed Workers' Compensation Self-Insured It Fund Budget on Schedule VI. An appropriation of $155,000 r is recommended for 1990-91 to maintain the current level of accumulated reserves as recommended by the Fiscal Policy Committee. (c) Unemployment Insurance - The Districts are on an actual claim basis because of favorable history and only $25, 000 ini ; contributions were required for the last year. We anticipate w making similar contributions in 1990-91 . (d) Group Medical - Includes the Districts' share of employee medical plan benefits for the prepaid HMO plans, the estimated bw total costs of the self-funded indemnity plan and the life and disability insurance premiums. Schedule VII details the I ! expected costs of the self-funded plan and the last of three annual increased employee contributions included in current MOUs. The recommended budget increase reflects our increased staffing level as well as increased costs. y (e) Uniforms - This budget projection is in accordance with � � employee MOU's. We have again been able to obtain favorable If bids for uniform rental, and the unit costs of uniform service have not increased for several years. � f r ti y r r If r �Y ) I w 1f V 1 ' r JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET NOREERS' COMPENSATION SELF-INSURED fUNO SCBEDULE VI 1990-91 FISCAL TEAR 5/1/90 1989-90 1990-91 1989-90 ESTIM.STRD EECOMMENT)" 6EPENDITURES BUDGET E)O)ENDITURES BUDGET 1. Salaries, Wages and Benefits 16.000 15,336 17,000 2. Benefits/Claims 110,000 107,496 110.000 3. Contractual Service. 13,000 12,650 16,000 4. Legal S.rvices 5,000 0 3.000 S. Prof...ional Services 25,000 25,337 30,000 6. Supplies A Other 1,000 6,422 7,000 7. Sub-Total 170,000 167.241 183,000 8. I..... Los. Polity 40,000 31,835 35,000 9. Total Expenditures 210.000 199,076 218,000 REVENUES A RESERVES 10. In-Lieu Presiuse 155,000 155,000 155,000 11. Interest A Miscellaneous 55,000 62,968 63,000 12. Total Revenues 210,000 217,968 218,000 12. Excess Revenue (Expenditures) 0 18,892 0 13. Reserve. and Transfers 699,000 677,487 696,000 14. Ending Reserves 699,000 696,379 696.000 NCBUD90.XLS-5/9/90 JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET SELF-FUNDED HEALTH PLAN TRUST FUND SCHEDULE VII 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR 5/1/90 1989-90 1990-91 EST. 90-91 1990-91 1989-90 ESTIMATED AT FULL PAYROLL RECOMMENDED EXPENDITURES BUDCET EXPENDITURES EMPLOYMENT SAVINGS BUDGET ----------- ----------- ------------ ----------- ------------ 1. Claims - Medical 940,000 780,516 1,051,000 (105,000) 946,000 2. - Disability 28,000 6,009 0 0 0 3. - Lang Ten Disability 90,000 11,806 0 0 0 4. - Dental 189,000 153.792 190,000 (20,000) 170,ODO S. Sub-Total 1.247,000 952,123 1,241,000 (125,000) 1,116,000 7. Contractual Services 42,000 40,313 53,000 (5,000) 48,000 6. Stop Loan Insurance 84,000 78,922 111.000 (11,000) 100,000 8. Total Expenditures 1.373,000 1,071,358 1,405,000 (141,000) 1,264.000 REVENUES A RESERVES 9. In-Lieu Premims From - CSDOC 1.001,000 701,393 877,000 (85,000) 792.000 - Employee 154,000 137,346 210,000 (20,000) 190.000 10. Internet A Mimes Ilan. 0 Z,578 0 0 0 11. Reimburse from Stop We. Ina. 0 25,229 0 0 0 12. Total Revenue 11155,000 866,546 1,087,000 (105.000) 982.000 13. Excess Revenue (Expendituree) (218,000) (204,812) (318,000) 36,000 (282.000) 14. Transfer. 223,000 336,260 318,000 (36,000) 282,000 IS. Beginning Reserves 155,000 24,283 156,000 156.000 16. Ending Reserves 160,000 155,731 156,000 0 156,ODO SPBUD90.XLS-5/17/90 JOINT BORES OPERATING BVOOHT PUBLIC LIABILITT SSLF-INSURED FUND SCHEDULE VIII 1990-91 PIS= TEAM 5/07/89 1989-90 1990-91 1989-90 ESTIHATED RECONNENDED EXPENDITURES BUDGET EXPENDITURES BEDGET 1. Salaries, Rages and Benefits 1,000 0 1,000 2. Benefit./Claims 20,000 13.582 20,000 3. Contractual Services 8,000 4,776 7,000 4. Legal Services 25,000 28,356 33,000 5. Professional Services 1,000 0 1,000 S. Supplies 4 Other 1.000 1.227 2,000 7. Sub-Total 56,000 47,941 64,000 S. Excess Was Policy 265.000 265,000 9. Total ExpeMitures 321,000 47,941 329,000 REVENUES 4 RESERVES 10. In-Lieu Premiums 258,000 258,000 258.000 11. Interest 4 Hiscellanecus 120,000 149,360 140,000 12. Allocation to other Funds 0 0 0 12. Total Revenues 378,000 407,360 398,000 12. Excess Revenue (Expenditure.) 57,000 359,419 69.000 13. eeearve. entl Trenefere 3,648,000 1,543,403 1,903,000 r 14. Ending Resew 1,705,000 1.902.822 1,972,000 PLBUD90.XLS-5/9/90 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY JOINT WORKS CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND PjA1TAT10N 5g tapolitan Or �IS,� 0 sin'. 1954 .l ggNGE COUNA 1990-1991 FISCAL YEAR ADOPTED JUNE 139 1990 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I ! 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 CORF.A.XLS CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SCHEDULE A SUMMARY OF DISTRICT'S REQUIREMENTS AND COMPARISON TO LAST YEAR A B C B E F 1990-91 1990-91 BUDGET 1989-90 PRELIMINARY COMPARABLE DISTRICT EQUITY BUDGET BEGINNING GRANT BUDGET PERCENT REQUIREMENTS RESERVES FUNDS REQUIREMENTS 1 9.98% 10,321 ,000 (b) 8,739,000 100,000 10,252,000 (b) 2 28.66% 29,641 ,000 (a) 30,362,000 286,000 29,441 ,000 (a) 3 31.26% 32,330,000 (a) 40,450,000 313,000 32,112,000 (a) 5 4.80% 4,964,000 (b) 2,404,000 48,000 4,931 ,000 (b) 6 5.33% 5,512,000 (b) 4,250,000 53,000 5,475,000 (b) 7 7.54% 7,798,000 (a) 14,910,000 75,000 7,745,000 (a) it 6.60% 6,826,000 (b) 2,514,000 ► 66,000 6,780,000 (b) 13 0.26% 269,000 7,736,000 3,000 267,000 14 5.67% 5 761 000 (c) 56 000 5 722 000 (c) TOTAL 100.00X 103 422 000 111 ,365,000 1 000 000 102 725 000 t Includes sale of capacity in Slater System to District 3 approved May 9, 1990 (a) Long-range financial projections indicate these Districts may need to issue debt in 1990-91 (b) Long-range financial projections indicate these Districts will need to issue debt in 1990-91 (c) Funds will be provided by required deposits from IRWD 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 slul9p CAPITAL OUTLAY RIVOLVIXG IONO ICBIDOLI 1-1 BOIDIAIT Of JOINT VORIS CORITAOCTION n9OI1ININTS Page 1 1910.1§11 70 1999.2000 A B C 0 1 I G B I J [ L OIIG TOTAL Revisit TOTAL IITIXATID 1190111t 13714TID 13TIXA710 IITIBATIO MYRIAD IINI IITIIATID 71, C0s7 M PIOJIM IJT PIOJIM is? C.I.P. BDDGIT MOST BODGIT MOUNT Belong 7W BIAGIT lint COIPLITI 1919.10 1911-91 6/30190 1970.91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 list-15 MTAL 1995-goof MTAL PROJICTI ........... ............................ ................................................................ ....................................... ............ 1. New sod lebodgeted Kolar Projects A. leclavalioo Hoot 1 1. Beadvorke 10.2 1 flint 10.1, 11.201P1-31 39,455,000 39,201,121 31,701,126 500,000 500,000 $00,000 2. Naelebouler Disposal 6 Simple Its 11.27.1/213 3,010,123 2,010,423 500,000 500,100 1,000,000 1,000,010 S. Primary Clarifiers nog. 6.15, PI.33 10,111,000 41,709,372 13,719,112 17,000,000 16,000,000 1,000,000 11,001,000 21,000,000 /. Get Bladllag facilities, PI.31.1 12,120,000 14,416,110 2,116,910 7,000,000 5,000,000 11,000,000 12,000,000 S. sludge laodling facilities, 11.31.2 22,500,000 20,121,501 1'571,564 0,000,000 6,000,000 250,o00 11,250,000 14,250,000 6. Digesters 11.16, PI-31-3 25,640,100 31,401,665 1,665 1,000,000 1f,000,000 t0,000,00o 32,000,000 32,000,000 7. 1eMbllitallea of Digestere 7 11, 11.33.1 2,593,100 2,317,101 2,291,601 50,000 50,000 50r000 S. lebebllltstloa of Digesters 9 6 10, PI-35-2 3,500,001 3,500,000 $00,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 3,510,000 3,500,000 9. teeladmry Text lmpiashl to 10 IGO, 9-06 21,697,000 31,164,411 1/,015 600,000 1,500,000 11,000,000 11,000,000 31,100,000 31,100,000 10. Primary Treetaeat 12 NOD Rlpem6tol, PI.37 12,50o,000 31,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 19,000,000 12,000,000 1.060,100 34,000,000 31,000,000 11. Rise. Nadlflcetlea, PI-31 10,003,211 3,111 1,000,000 1,100,000 4,000,000 1,000,001 10,000,000 10,000,000 12, eecorlll 6 Laodecaplog, II-31-1 1,600,Oot $00,000 1,000,100 300,000 1,400,000 1,100,000 13. lortkgaake York, PI-31-2 1,900,000 100,010 1,500,000 1,900,000 1,100,000 H. seismic Opgradie0 A Strvctoril vort, 11.38.3 3,000,000 31000.000 700,000 1,000,000 300,000 3,000,000 3r000,000 15. fuel S71ten Improvements, 1-033-1 170,001 221,931 22,131 200,010 200,000 200,000 16. 10 NOD Oxygen Activated Hodge 6 OAPs 65,41),016 61,000,000 1,100,000 1,000,000 65,000,000 17. Belt Presses II Omits) 11,300,010 15,500,000 501,000 2,000,000 0,000,000 5,000,000 15,500,000 15,500,000 to. solids storage 1411111 10,177,000 11,000,000 1'006'000 6,000,000 5,000,000 it. Digesters: 2 11100 Bllleter 3,100,060 1,100,000 1,000,000 3r200r000 3,200,000 7r100r000 1,800,000 1,200,000 20, standby Paver Gelevation 7,735,006 7,735,000 2,300,000 5,435,004 7,735,000 1,735,004 21. The llevtTlcal Mrer Dletrlbetlot 2.477,006 2,000,000 100,000 600,000 2,000,000 2,800,000 12. Ilectrlfloatloo Project 2,106,000 2,250,000 100,000 1,110,100 750,000 2,250,600 2,250,000 23. Rev Sweat, Imergeacy Rupees 1,917,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,001 a 24. Remove Triciling filters I A 3 1,160,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,305,000 1,300,000 25. Central Air Campteesor Station 250,000 250,000 Street 200,000 250,000 250,000 H. Ilse. Project$ 10,000,000 11,250,000 250,000 1,too coo I coo,000 1,Goo,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 5,coo,009 5,000,000 to,000,000 out-TOTAL - 11CLAXATION PLANT 1 329,080,005 3i1,511,S6i 66,166.56i /S,iSO,lee S6,IS0,000 SI,IOO,000 31,oa0,e0a 11,135,000 217,SI5,100 11,IOO,OAO 231,115,000 1D,010,1/0 CAPITAL INTENT 19VOLVING FORD SCBIOnI 8-0 lowly of JOINT Doing 0ONS710101 II96111NINTS Pape 2 1590-1991 TO 1999-2000 A 1 C 0 1 P G N I J [ L ORIG TOTAL IIV106 TOTAL IITINATID IIQOIIID 11TINITIP 937INATn IOIIVATIO 18714710 151 19TIBATIO ?II COO io PIOJIC? IS? ?IOilef Up C.I.P. SIOGI? BODGIT 100017 WDOGIT UNIT TIA? RINGS? IRA[ CONP1111 1999.90 1990.91 6130/90 1990-11 1911.9E 1192-93 1993-94 1991.15 TOTAL 1915-2000 SISAL TIMM ........... ............................ ................................................................ ......................... ............ ...........- B. 7reatieot Hoot 2 1. eopport facilities and lite Impreselenb a. Operations Ratifies, 12.23.5.1 3,115,011 3,in'101 25,000 100,000 2,600,000 11500,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 I. larehouse golldiNg, ?2.35.2 1,950,o01 31261,001 14,000 250,000 1,000,000 110001000 11000,000 5,250,000 S,250,000 c. Naiatsoaece loildleg , P2.35.1 1,200,061 11261,001 11,000 250,006 1,000,000 3,000,000 1,010,000 5,250,000 5,250,000 d. Contraction Magellan Office, P2-3S-/ 1,266,666 11302,006 14,000 $01,000 740,000 66,001 I,EBB,oco 1,201,000 I. Phase II Site aid locality 11proTnerts, 12-05.5 2,300,000 2,305,006 5,000 100,001 1,300,000 900,000 I,Jo0,000 2,300,000 2. Miss Nod. 6 11pro1e1nt1 to Facilities, P2-37 7,161,606 1,151,000 7,ISL,OOo 111001600 1,000,000 1,000,000 3. Rehab Digester 1, J, 1, 12.39.1 2,651,000 11311,000 347,000 11500,000 11500,011 3,000,000 31/001000 1. Rehab Digester 1, 1, ?2.39.2 1.761,001 1,000,000 11000,001 2,100,500 3,000,000 3,000,000 S. Rehab Digester 1, 0, 22.39.3 1,161,101 11000,000 21060,000 21000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 6. froceol control IlproTelals, P2.10 270,000 131,001 111,000 250,100 S5o,0o0 250,000 7. Primary Trenlnt 20 NOD liplleioo, 12.11 14,300,001 15,000,000 IS,000,001 15,000,100 1. secondary Troltseat lmpslslem, P2.12 10,400,006 21,214,000 211,000 21000,000 6,400,000 12,000,000 1,000,000 21,000,000 21,000,000 9. llectrificatioo Project, P2.12-1 6,500,016 11,000,001 1,001,000 1,000,000 S,000,000 14,000,000 11,000,100 10. Nile. Nodifieatiooa, P2.13.1 3,S09,000 t,000 500,000 1,000,o0D 2,000,ODO 3,500,000 3,500,000 H. Imrthsella Fort, ?2-11-2 31000,000 SOe,DOD 1,500,000 1.000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 12. leisi a 1ppradinp 6 Mutual Bork, P243-3 4,305,000 1,305,000 705,001 21000,000 I,fo0,600 1,305,006 11105.000 13. lolltorieg2Cntrol System, t2.11 5,330,000 4,010,000 10,000 21000.001 11500,000 504,000 110001000 4,000,001 If. list System I1proTnemts, 1-133.2 110,000 263,000 113,000 1So,o00 150,000 150,ODI 15. Stladby Pour Geaer tioa 9,200,000 9,200,000 9,200,000 9,2OD,000 16. Solidi storage: 2 Bice 5,201,000 5,200,000 Roo,000 2,100,OA0 2,100,000 1,200,000 5,200,00D 17. AdditlooQ 105 fnl Digester 3,195,000 1,000,00o 2,000,000 2,000,000 21000,000 11. Potable later Distribution Slates 3,109,000 31000,000 100,000 300,000 3,500,000 3,800,000 19. floor Vitae Plop Ititlon 1,110,000 11200,000 11200,000 I,2o0,000 20. Nile. Projects 10,000,000 10,400,001 400,000 1.000,000 11000,000 1,000,0o0 1,600,011 1,000,000 5,/10,000 510001000 10,000,000 .......... ........... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... ......... ........... .......... ........... ........... SOB-MAL - TIIAINSIT PW? 2 103,752,060 135,137,001 I,S0/,100 11,305,000 21,000,000 36,400,001 1,100,000 3,711,000. 65,393,000 35,100,000 125,is ,0I E,OOI,OoO I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I J 1 I 1 I I I 1 I CAPITAL OOTUT INVOLVING On JCIIMLI 1-1 sums or JOINT volts tooltl0nnl ualnlmts faIe I lite-u+l ?0 1IN5-2001 A C I r c e I J I L OIL inu nvam TOTAL Istiva0 ltgoulD IIrIltTAD 191UTID 11/14710 MINATAO nvI 19t 1AAtI0 Tim Cosi To nam Or naln w al.r. eaoGu DownInOit eoocO sOnlr Sue UNIT fin roenm uu-90 nlial 1 O So lilt-91 ullaJ 1111-I3 anal [ilt-is TOTAL 1995-1e11 MR naICTJ C. Ieclnallol Plitt Sites - 1. site Acgnsufol 15,000,400 5,110,msf 5,111,000 5,100,011 5,O0,001 2. leaalit+ae Pint J 61,000,011 61,610,e4e 100,000 J,Sofdoe 11,004,001 25,004,100 15,000,600 61,000,O0 61,004,001 Doe-TOTAL - nem7lop PALM/ 771100lt 11 ul off 5 101 PCs 21940,101 16,000,101 25,410,001 15,001,101 66,101,611 66,100,001 D. lalerpinf lad font facilities 1. hlerplesl racllites, i-0 A. 120' Iaterplul 1100 21,410,010 21,115,111 15,001 1,110,001 11,101,100 2,110,100 21,000,000 21,110,000 b. Isletpliatltum9One 1,111,000 1,00,00 1,000,001 J,n0,lt1 2,ne,101 1,10,101 1,Oa,1O C. lideuria later the 1lt,010 3,ou,111 l,fms,lol l,101,lt1 3,611,00 3,01,00 d. Digester Gas List Sokoto 1,006,004 511,O1 5O,111 1,011,000 1,011,004 <. maaamtalou Cable 1a,o01 la,0oo u1,110 24,601 124,101 120,000 J. Disport facilities aid file laproeneah I. Admh. Idldnl Irpu. I Iehab.,!•7.1, J•7-5 5,710,100 5,751,155 1,iS1,155 1,419,111 1,000,100 1,110,100 b. Iehab/Cue Nut Lab to Office at pit 1, 1-11-1 f00,e11 1,151,615 1,115 $1,001 1,140,001 1,150,601 1,050,060 c. Ceatnl Laboratory, J-17 1,715,111 7,5SS,111 599,911 1.000,010 3,111,041 2II,101 7,205,001 1,110,100 d. larehene/Nafatunce Ridge. I0il back, J-10 3,111,001 21751,116 21551,511 204,116 211,110 111,fee e. GperattM/C>mttol easier, 1-l1.19 1,571,000 1,111,111 119,111 1,5 mill 1,511,101 511,111 4,511,110 1,500,401 I. 9ersoaul Inldhl at Pit 1 J-01 511,111 1,011,605 1,605 100,601 Su'll1 /11,141 1,1/1,000 1,111,110 9. Demolitiaa of lapput Ialdlll it float 1, J-Ji 51,111 1,111 51,11f 50,104 51,110 I. Central Geoeatlol facility a. 1g11pleat preporaale, J-ISA Jl,011,010 21,107,816 15,107,161 5,140,106 1,111,608 1,041,110 1,100,101 1,111,601 9,010,104 1,011,110 10,100,060 b. lalnn. reran., J-191 J,0IN,4O 9,723,131 3,121,es1 C. Plitt I fatuity, J-19-1 15,601,100 16,125,111 1,125,111 1,4O,000 8,011,010 1,1O,111 15,004,100 u,110,111 I. ?last 1 facility, J-a-J 15,7s+,nl 1e,5IN,959 1,541,151 6,004,10e 9,610,O4 1,100,111 18,114,100 11,004,010 1. Vesta Go, flan, J-11, J-Ja 161,10e Io0,a5 50,uI 150,000 15e,010 654,000 5. Oalfmll I lonler Plop et,liou a. fool......t of 71' Ottfall asset. 1-77-1 ILmmdl 2,I11,104 1,111,511 2,111,561 1,101,011 1,011,401 1,101,114 b. leplece nffall No. 1 toad feclln. J-Jl-! 2,441,101 1,511,101 501,101 1,616,101 1,501,101 _ 1,500,001 C. New Serve tower No. 1, J-21-I 1,119,004 1,110,000 3,110,001 1,000,001 4,011,000 4,000,000 d, ?top CI! Stalin for WIWI go. 1 2,600,000 1,110,000 2,690,111 2,111,000 e. 9ecoad Olsatrge leader Was 'C' I,Sit'lle 1,116,000 411,111 111,111 3,610,114 4.000,110 f. llte.d 71' to Deep later with 120' ostiou Il.nf,mse te,661,111 I1,011,111 31,O01.001 14,110.106 1. hnant 11onster nd left Pmallly,J-19111A120 S0,110 $14,696 74,611 111,116 $00,001 501,0e0 7. Prepultloo of otllify Atlas, J-75 2,500,000 560,001 1,600,004 1,000,000 2,500,000 2,506.000 1. Teleploae/felea<ttlllomllorlaq IIPI.1I0. 3,000,011 500,000 511,044 2,6ee,006 3,011,060 3,000,001 1. lahlnuce Nnagnnt Compiler hates 901,100 111,01e 111,111 110,000 1t. nand hterplul Trial leplacemnt J1,111,111 31,111,101 1,111,111 51111,000 15,011.410 21,100,101 1,O40,060 31,400,401 11. Ilectrinl Power Systems leatbuuatha laedles 3,100,004 4,300,001 100,000 1,O0,000 1,001,001 2,300,000 2,0O,044 1,100,016 IJ. Dlwdle Dlnaul Project, 1. talent Deaosstrauoa nut 1,000,004 f,000,060 L110,e0e 6,300,440 1,101,110 9,060,466 S. Load legaisuma 22,401,9IN n,000,e11 1,111,411 1,611,O0 2d10,O1 21,1O,011 21d01,061 C. Ludful Develonest Flats 1 20,60e,000 21,O4,100 11,010,O0 13,008,611 n,100,1e6 d. Compost factli0r O,to1,000 $it O0,000 5,0O,0O 5,0 0,o00 45,160,100 u. Disc Projects s Doe woo 0 I0o ltt l00 too 1 oeo Oe 1 uo oaf 1 0eo Doe 1 too 01 1 000 o0e s Doe 00o s Oa w 10 too no Joe-?OTAL - ImsOPult I JOm u1,alJ,uo v1,uLat asn,a! naO,0u 51,171,00: a,1O,Oe II,l01,00 n,1O,aaf ul,ul,lol 9:aO,es1 US, I lilt 19,O1,u1 Joe-roar - u9o1 nonnf u11a ltr fo1 lts l0 In 1st w 9f eos o0o of 70 000 1JJ of Noe 19 I00 001 64,1 o ooa 515 81 Goo 145 fa a0l Sit eft fee uJ 0o ace CAPITAL CHASE REVOLVING FUND SCBIDOLI 3-1 immly O1 JOH? TONS CONSTIUC110N IIOUIIININIB Pape 1 1910-1991 TO 1911-2000 A B C I 1 ! 0 1 1 J I L DIED TOTAL HUNG 70TIL IBTINATID 110011E0 I17IIA7ID ISTIVATID 1211KRTID IITINITIO IIVI ISTIn7I0 Ho COST TD PIOJECT is? PIOJICT 1ST C.I.P. EIGHT 80001T BUDGET BUDGET Badly 11A1 BEGIN? TIAI MODERN 1989.90 1990-91 6 30 90 1990-91 1911.92 1992.11 iM-H 1931-95 TOTAL 1995-2000 TOTAL PIOJECf9 E. Special Projects, Studies a Meseta A. Action Plan • NPDII permit ApOlieatiol 53,000 176,000 151,000 75,000 /5,000 120,000 120,000 B. solids Treatsebt Sod Disposal projects 1. Sludge Disposal Projects 196,000 680,000 10,000 25,006 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 225,000 375,000 600,600 2. 1lud98 lisle Projects I00,000 25,000 50,000 50,000 $0,000 50,000 225,000 175,001 600,001 C. Deep scan Disposal InlnAtloe 509,000 2,229,000 579,000 50,000 150,000 150,000 250,000 250,000 950.000 700,100 1,650,000 D. Air Quality nOtrol Proprn 3,500,001 11500,000 $1500,000 1. Air ToNlcs Mastery (AB25/8 N/ PIIPI 100,000 1,975,000 175,000 1,000,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,600,000 111001000 2. VOC1100 JAC?Demonstration Proprn 250,000 600,000 50,000 110,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 600,000 600,000 3. Future Projese 3,501,010 31510,061 31500,000 1. Chemical Baodlieg lad Control 11proveaeota 25,000 100,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 IO,000 50,000 50,000 100,000 1. Central Laboratory Deselopleot VOprsl 12S,000 55,000 25,000 25,000 5,000 55,000 SS,000 G. later Coonrntloo Projects 1,220,000 70,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 410,000 150,000 1,220,000 B. later leclasation lei aid Spec Projects 900,000 100 000 300 000 300,000 100 000 100 000 In 000 100,000 200.00 80-TOTAL - SPECIAL PIOJICTS 1,285,001 15,359,000 /71 000 1 155 000 EIS 000 1,115,000 910,000 910,400 51175,000 91350,000 14,525,000 3. Iguipleat ties$ 32,550,000 39,224,000E200 060 E 262 000 1 500 000 1 500 000 1 500 006 1 500 000 1 26i 000 1 500 000 IS 763 000107A4 JOIYT YOAn GPI7A4 IIpU[IEVlBT6 110 199 000 162 EBB BSI 1 BSI 122 DO0 11E 105 000 13/ 961 000 11 710 000 66 611 000 S21 I31 000 161 I90 000 691 6E1 000 ifi6 222 000 TOTAL VITB EST'D 53 ANIBAL tut-LA CONS? COST ADJUSTNINT 1.230,371,249 104,341,851 103,122,400 156,670,76) 1/1,662,601 I11,17l,OSS 10,992,111 597,222,237 2E9,607,5I1 621,629,751 291,119,600 CORP7_91.345 COBNTT SANITATION DISTRICTS OF CHANCE COME 9CtlfWL[ C CORE [QUTINEN, SO...1 l/1/90 1990-91 MCSB A OTHER MACHINE CpOON TESTS 6 TEST fiA E[ii OFFICE OEPT VEHICLES IpOIL. SO EO A TOOLS [O01Po[Nr MINTIM 6 T4ETW EO 11. A .O OTHER TOTAL NO. DEPARTMENT 55561-M-00 55562-N-00 55563-N-00 35369-11-00 55560-N-00 555.1-N-00 3338B-M-00 SSSeP-M-OO ( SOCCET 2uO wna•.•nt Ornu• wn.a•.•nt ane0^rt 66,J00 10,300 e..wnnel u,000 9,6I5 22s06 66,800 lox.ns 2210 Director o1 none. 15.000 15.000 2226 Accounting 75,910 lapin 2230 eutcw.lty/Var.Munmg 2,500 14s06 17,000 22e0 mmtvu0n .y Tss. 25,000 21e,750 6,506 157,335 609,5e5 3310 C.n.r.l Superintendent 26,000 13,000 10,000 25,200 72,200 JJaa e1-t 70,000 3e,000 20,S50 17.200 1.360 165,210 3380 Coll.otmn t.cultl.. 263,000 s,aso 4,000 3.200 27e,250 vsO H..ee,lra w4T.nent. tl3,t➢O le,z9s I,SOo 102.995 3360 11,500 6,500 12,525 2,625 1..120 1,2e0 51,s50 3370 m.trr.nt. wlot A--C. x2,eo0 1,125 e,650 16,350 47.125 SSeO rr. Am glint opar, 23,000 1..0. 12.ISO 12,500 25,500 01.110 SsiO 01 r.ctnr o1 T.Nn1u6 parr. 2so0 15p00 1e,200 as20 comp-l.nc. Se11.0 ID,626 07,620 3530 Goner., 4e1. A ..uo 9.615 9,415 3580 laboratory 207,500 3.350 210,050 31.. Bcuete Control 23,000 S,ISO 25,A00 %,A00 SO.IOO IOB.OSO 3710 Director of IM lnertlnd 0 3I20 .tennis, end 4etgn 36.000 157,600 193.400 3700 Construction Management 166,000 13,500 43,1I5 16.700 3,700 8.4.0 259.e15 TOTAL 90-91 9[OOSSTB 653.500 165.B00 HE.= 320,050 33I.I70 44,140 669.120 0 2,262,000 ..,ORF4 91.EL5 COPI4A1 OUTLAY flBVOLVING POND CLASSIFICATION OF BUDGETED PROJECTS BY RBVENUR PROGRAM CATEGORIES SCHEDULE 8-2 FISCAL YEAR 199D-91 Page 1 A B C 0 B P G REQUIRED RBPLACBMNT IMPROVED ADDITIONAL REPLACBNMT IMPROVED ADDITIONAL BUDGE? 6 TRBATMEMT CAPACITY 6 TREATNER4 CAPACITY 1990-91 RECONSTR RBCONSTR 1. New and Rebudgeted Major Projects A. Reclamation Plant 1 1 Headworks No.2 P Plant No.l, PI-20/PI-31 500,000 40% 60t 200,000 300,000 2 Nastehauler Disposal 8 Sample Stu PI-27-1/213 500,000 501 50% 250,000 250,000 3 Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15, PI-33 17,000,000 1001 17,000,000 4 Gas Handling Facilities, PI-34-1 7,000,000 201 801 1,100,000 5,600,000 5 Sludge Handling Facilities, PI.31.2 8,000,000 50% 50% 4,000,000 4,000,000 6 Digesters 11-16, PI-34-3 7,000,000 1001 7,000,000 7 Rehabilitation of Digesters 7 6 8, PI-35-I 50,000 1001 50,000 8 Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 6 10, PI-35-2 toot 9 Secondary Tnt Expansion to 80 EGO, PI-36 600,000 1001 600,000 10 Primary Treatment 72 MGD Expansion, P1-37 1,000,000 100% 1,000,000 11 Misc. Modification, P1-30 1,000,000 100% 1,000,000 12 Security 6 Landscaping, P1-38-1 500,000 100% 500,000 13 Earthquake Mork, P1-38-2 400,000 100% 400,000 14 Seismic Upgrading 6 Structural Nark, PI.38-3 700,000 100% 700,000 15 Fuel System Improvements, R-033-1 200,000 100% 200,000 16 40 NOD Oxygen Activated Sludge 6 DAP's 1001 17 Belt Presses (4 Units) 100% 18 Solids Storage 14 Bins) 1001 19 Digesters: 2 8 110' Diameter 1001 20 Standby Power Generation 100% 21 12kv Electrical Power Distribution 100% 22 Electrification Project 200,000 100% 200,000 33 Raw Sewage Emergency Bypass 100% 21 Remove Trickling Filters 163 100% 25 Central Air Compressor Station SOt 501 26 Misc. Projects 1 000 OOO 602 20% 20% 600,000 200,000 200,000 SUBTOTAL - RECLAMATION PLANT 1 1 45,650,000 I 1 1 1 LB,OOO,OOo 2,100,000 35,550,000 COAy4_91.YLS CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND CLASSIFICATION OF BUDGETED PROJECTS BY REVENUE PROGRAM CATEGORIES SCHEDULE B-2 FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 Page 2 A B C D a P G REQUIRED REPLACAXNT IMPROVED ADD[TIONAL REPLACEXNT IMPROVED ADDITIONAL BUDGET 6 TREATMENT CAPACITY R TREATMENT CAPACITY 1990-91 RECON67A RBCONSTA B. Treatment Plant 2 1 Support Facilities and Site Improvements a. Operations Building, P2-23-5-1 100,000 100E 100,000 b. Warehouse Building, P2.35-2 250,000 100E 250,000 c. Maintenace Building , P2-35-3 250,000 100E 250,000 d. Construction Management Office, P2.35.4 100E e. Phase II Site and S; ity Improvements, P2-35-5 100,000 100E 100,000 2 Misc Xr+ifos 8 Improvements to Facilities, P'-31 1,000,000 100E 1,000,000 3 Rehat Piwtei, I,J,A, PZ-39-1 1,500,000 100E 1,500,000 4 Rehal. Digesters L,X, P2-39-2 100E 5 Rehab Digesters N,O, P2-39-3 100E 6 Process Control Improvements, P2.40 250,000 501 SOE 125,000 125,000 7 Primary Treatment 24 MG Expansion, P2.41 100E - 8 Secondary Treatment Expansion, P2-42 2,000,000 751 251 1,500,000 500,000 9 Electrification Project 1,000,000 100E 1,000,000 1D Misc. Modifications, PZ-43 500,000 100E 500,ODO 11 Earthquake Work, P2-43-1 500,000 100E 500,000 12 Seismic Upgrading 6 Structural Work, P2.43-2 705,000 100E 705,000 13 Monitoring/Control System 2,000,000 Sol 501 1,000,000 1,000,000 14 fuel System improvements, R-033-2 150,000 100E 150,000 15 Standby Pome. Generation 100E 16 Solids Storage: 2 Bins 1001 17 Additional 105 Pool Digester 100E 18 Potable Water Distribution Systea 100E 19 Plant Water Pump Station 100E 20 Misc, Projects 1,000,000 601 201 20% 600,000 200,000 200,000 SUB-TOTAL - TREATMENT PLANT 2 11,305,000 5,475 000 2,9 000 2 925,000 1 1 1 1 1 1 COt.a n.ni CnInL oRW/ nlOLl116 tRD CLASSIIIniIDR 0f BOOGITIO PIOJIQS By HIM PIOGIR CATIR1115 SCHI00L11-2 11SCR TRI 1990-91 Sage 1 1 1 C D 1 f G Roping IIPWCIBR IBPIOVIO ADDITIOIn IIfWC11R IIPIOVIO nD1V1A1W BUDGIT a i1Wn11 }T Capacity 6 ?In? RRC1R 1910-91 ilcolsVf IICOISTI C. Ieclultiol till sites I Site Acquiltioa 5,006,000 sot 50% 21504,000 2,500,000 2 Ruination Plait 1 101,000 50% SR 50,006 50,100 5011-MIL - IICIAIdVI01 ?LABS 5.101 000 21550,610 2,550,000 D. laterplau as Joist facilities 1 ilterplut facilites, 1-9 A. 120- tsterpLnl lilt MI/,OAA 101 901 400,000 3,600,000 I. Irterplmt Utility Close 1,600,000 lot SUB 200,000 100,000 c. Iodastrul later List 1,010,001 sot 501 500,000 $04,000 d. Digester Gas Liu 561,000 SR sit 250,000 250,000 e. Commoticatioma Cable 161,0o1 50% 501 50,000 SA,AaO E Sapport facilities ad Site Improvements a. Again. laildla9 Sense. 1 Ie1ab. 1-7-1. J-7-5 1,040,106 10% 101 901 100,001 100,100 160,000 b. tebablcoR. list. Lab at fit 1 to office. J-11-1 lilt c. Central Laboratory, J-11 1,000,060 1001 1'000'060 d. liuloolerhiatemalce Bldg$. I Oil Does, J40 200,010 Sol Sot 101,006 100,006 e. Operations Rildiag, J-21-1 a 2 1,500,001 50% Sol 756,006 750,060 1. Peraanel Bnldiu at Pit 1, J-26 101,001 1101 1/1,000 I. Demolition of Sipport Belldhg at Rant 2, J-27 1 Cenral 6aentiog facility i. Igoipmeat Prepounse, 3-191 5,610,061 SR 5R 2,506,000 2,500,060 I. W5610, faufau, J-191 C. Plait 1 facility, J-19.1 6,100,001 sit sot 3,000,000 1,000,000 d. Pilot 2 facility, J-19-2 1,000,001 Sot Sot 4,140,000 4,000,000 1 Bute WI Blares,J-21, J-21A 654,011 100% 650,004 5 Oltfall 1 Booster Pap Statieal a. tepfacemt of 71- Rlfstl Sever, J-22-1 (toad) 1,010,000 100% 1,101,000 D. topics Oettlll la. 1 Lead Sectioa, J-22-2 loot c. lee urge tour No. 1, J-22-1 1101 d. Veto C12 Station for Bartell No. I loot e. Seemed Discharge Bader MIS •C• 701 lit 1. Irteid iP to Deep later lit0 120- Ontsll loot 6 liflaen Ilaaeter aid feat facility,J4112/11218 SR,000 tell $00,006 7 Preparatia OF utility Allan. 3-25 501,000 loot 581,001 1 Telephaae/RleulN/l0ailanag Irpanuom 500,000 Sol lot 250,000 250,000 1 Battles Nice Seller COIRaler Sysla 101,014 IRl 100,000 If Bombard laterplaal Treat Replacement lot tut 11 ❑ectriul Pour System, lebsbilitatica Stadsea 300,001 160% 100,000 IJ Slodge Disposal 1. Compost D9109$tratlol flat $11 Sot b. Land Agalsltiot 50% Sol c. Laadfill Uevnamen Plane I sot 50% d. Miter fatuity sit SR u Bile Projects 1.000 000 nt tit tot 600,000 2a,oR 210,000 SUB-TOTAL - Million? a JOIN 37.750 off 1s,1a0,0e/ t,lgl,ago 2osso.olo SWIM!, - Idiot PRmIRS stall ODD a 575 ono 9 R5.000 61.515.004 CORF4 91.ELS CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND CLASSIFICATION Of BUDGETED PROJECTS BY REVENUE PROGRAM CATEGORIES SCHEDULE B-2 FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 Page 4 A B C D S P G REQUIRED REPLACENNT IMPROVBD ADDITIONAL RBPLACBNNT IMPROVED REQUIRED BUDGET fi TREATMENT CAPACITY & TREATMENT CAPACITY 1990-91 BECOME RRCOMS4R 2. Special Projects, Studies & Researcb A. Action Plan - NPDBS Permit Application 75,000 100E 75,000 B. Solids Treatment and Disposal Projects I Sludge Disposal Projects 25,000 100E 25,000 2 Sludge Reuse Projects 25,000 100E 25,000 C. Deep Ocean Disposal Evaluation 50,000 100E 50,000 D. Air Qua i'.y CL'tr6. Program 1 Air Tonics Iorentory (AB2588) 1,000,000 100E 1,000,000 2 VOC/ROG BACT Demonstration Program 50,000 100E 50,000 3 Future Projects 100E E. Chemical Handling and Control Improvements 10,000 100E 10,000 H. Central Laboratory Development Program 25,000 100E 25,000 I. pater Conservation Projects 70,000 100E 70,000 J. Hater Reclamati,a R&D and Spec Projects 100 000 100E 100,000 SUB-TOTAL - SPECIAL PROJECTS 1 355 000 11355,000 3. Equipment Items 2,262,000 10% fi0E 30E 226,000 1,357 000 679,000 TOTAL JOINT WORKS CAPITAL REQUIREN&NRS 103 422 000 2B 801 000 tt 361 000 62 254 000 t U I t t < r r t t a 1 [ 9 RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 32 - DISTRICTS 6, 7 & 14 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .1 ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA July 3, 1990 tpe""EWS AVENUE vn EM ell? `!I F TNN VY .CIILIFONNIG 921 l27 STAFF SUMMARY nl"1"8d.2"11 DISTRICTS 6. 7 AND 14 CEOA ACTIONS RE SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR PROPOSED FORMATION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14 AND PROPOSED REORGANIZATION NO. 79 INVOLVING REORGANIZATION OF DISTRICTS NOS. 7 AND 13 RE BAKER-GISLER INTERCEPTOR. CONTRACTS NOS. 14-1-1A AND 14-1-1B, AND BAKER FORCE MAINS. CONTRACT NO. 14-1-2. Currently being designed and built under Contracts Nos. 14-1-1A, 14-1-1B and 14-1-2 are the Baker/Gisler joint conveyance facilities to handle flows from Districts 6, 7 and 14. These improvements were approved as part of the formation of District 14 in January 1986. After discussions with the designer and staff of the City of Costa Mesa, the final alignment of the westerly leg of the sewer line, between Harbor Boulevard and the Santa Ana River, was.changed from being routed entirely through public rights-of-way (streets) to requiring easements from public agencies and private property owners. The size of the sewer was also increased from the originally envisioned 72 inches to 90 inches to allow for "freeboard", a capacity allowance for unknown occurrences in accordance with a policy included in the 1989 Master Plan approved by the Boards. Because these were not addressed in the original EIR, staff initiated additional environmental studies in order to assure compliance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) regulations. These projects begin at the Main Street Pump Station, located in the John Wayne Airport "clear zone" just north of Main Street. The Main Street Pump Station, and this project, will convey flow from the cities of Tustin and Irvine to the Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant. Between the pump station and Baker Street at Bristol Street, two 42-inch force mains (pressure lines) will be constructed under Contract No. 14-1-2, expected to start construction in a few months. Between Bristol Street and Fairview Road, construction of an 81-irch gravity sewer is nearly complete under Contract No. 14-1-18. This project includes the rebuilding of Baker Street for the City of Costa Mesa, under a cooperative reimbursement agreement. Because there were no problems with alignment on this phase and no easements were required, the project was apprr�ed by the Directors for construction. The final leg, Contract No. 14-1-1A, a 90-inch gravity sewer, extenus from Fairview Road westerly in Baker to Deodor Avenue (one block west of �.J Harbor) , where it turns north to Gisler Avenue. The first of three easements, within a private parking lot, is required in this Deodor leg. The parking lot serves a commercial building. The occupant of this property is opposed to construction within the parking lot, and has engaged an attorney to represent him. The attorney presented comments (after the close of the public comment period) which are addressed in the Final EIR document. The response gives reasons for the alignment choice, namely this alignment minimizes traffic and homeowner disruption. The project then proceeds westerly in Gisler Avenue to the Santa Ana River. Between the Greenville-Banning Channel (located on the east side of the Santa Ana River) and westerly side of the Costa Mesa bluff, the project is designed within the northerly boundary of the Mesa Verde Country Club golf course, requiring a second private easement. This golf course alignment out of the street right-of-way is necessary because the street is lower than the profile of the sewer conduit. The Mesa Verde Country Club has also engaged an attorney to present their opposition to construction on their golf course. The comments (received after the close of the comment period) were responded to in the Final EIR. This alignment will certainly impact the golf course, but minimizes disruption over other possible alignments, or the raising of Gisler Avenue's elevation. As stated in the Final EIR, loss of trees and shrubs will be mitigated by either replanting existing specimens or buying new specimens. After siphoning under the Greenville-Banning Channel , the alignment proceeds north in private right-of-way to the point where it enters the Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant. Acquisition of a third easement from Southern California Edison is required in the narrow area between the Santa Ana River and the Greenville-Banning Channel . The Districts' engaged Ultrasystems, Inc. to prepare Draft Supplement No. 1 to the 1985 EIR for Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Reorganization of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 7 and 13. The supplement was completed and received and filed by the Directors in February. In March the Directors conducted a public hearing and received and filed comments submitted at that time. The public comment period closed March 20. All comments are included and addressed in the Final Supplement No. 1. Most of the comments advised the Districts of special concerns. As mentioned above, two comments were received on behalf of property owners that are opposed to the project as presently aligned. -2- �.s� c ' RESOLUTION NO. 90-86 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 6, 7 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA CERTIFYING FINAL SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR PROPOSED FORMATION OF COUNTY DISTRICT NO. 14 AND PROPOSED REORGANIZATION NO. 79 INVOLVING REORGANIZATION OF DISTRICTS NOS. 7 AND 13 RE BAKER-GISLER INTERCEPTOR, CONTRACTS NOS. 14-1-1A AND 14-1-1B, AND BAKER FORCE MAINS, CONTRACT NO. 14-1-2 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNNECTION THEREWITH, AND ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x WHEREAS, on July 24, 1985 the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, received and approved a Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13 Environmental Impact Report (EIR) by adoption of Resolution No. 85-130; and WHEREAS, the EIR approved by said Resolution No. 85-130 included the Baker-Gisler Interceptor and Baker Force Mains as projects covered by the EIR but offered alternatives and not specifics regarding pipe size and final alignment; and WHEREAS, in December 1986, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14 of Orange County, California, authorized the preparation of a Project Report on the Master-Planned Joint Sewage Conveyance Facilities to Serve Future Flows of Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14; and WHEREAS, as a result of the Project Report, a specific alignment for the Baker-Gisler Interceptor was recommended; and WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 6, -1- 7 and 14 of Orange County, California (DISTRICTS), have previously commissioned Ultrasystems, Inc. to prepare a Supplement No. 1 to Environmental Impact Report v for Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13 re Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Contracts Nos. 14-1-1A and 14-1-1B, and Baker Force Mains, Contract No. 14-1-2 to identify and analyze the impacts of construction of these sewage conveyance facilities and changes identified since the original Environmental Impact Report of 1985, (the "PROJECT"); and WHEREAS, DISTRICTS is the lead agency for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for projects contained within said Supplement, as defined in the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended (hereinafter "CEQA") and the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of CEQA as modified and adopted by the DISTRICTS (hereinafter "CEQA Guidelines"), and WHEREAS, in order to facilitate an objective assessment of the additional individual and collective environmental impacts associated with the changes since the July 1985 approval of the EIR, DISTRICTS have caused to be prepared a Draft Supplement No. 1 to Environmental Impact Report for Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13 (hereinafter referred to as "DRAFT SUPPLEMENT EIR) to address the significant, adverse environmental impacts, mitigation measures and Project alternatives associated with the Project; and WHEREAS, the DISTRICTS have consulted with other public agencies and the general public and given them the opportunity to comment on said DRAFT SUPPLEMENT EIR as required by the provisions of CEQA and CEQA Guidelines; and -2- f WHEREAS, on March 14, 1990, a duly-noticed public hearing was held by the Boards of Directors of the DISTRICTS to provide a further opportunity for the general public to comment on and respond to the DRAFT SUPPLEMENT EIR; and WHEREAS, the DISTRICTS have evaluated the comments received from public agencies and persons who reviewed the DRAFT SUPPLEMENT EIR; and WHEREAS, said comments and recommendations received on the DRAFT SUPPLEMENT EIR, either verbatim or in summary, a list of persons, organizations and public agencies commenting on the DRAFT SUPPLEMENT EIR, and the responses of the DISTRICTS to significant environmental points raised in the review and consultation process have been included in and made a part of said DRAFT SUPPLEMENT EIR to form the Final Supplement No. 1 to Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13 (hereinafter referred to as "FINAL SUPPLEMENT EIR") for said Project as required by Section 15132 of the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, said FINAL SUPPLEMENT EIR has been presented to the Boards of Directors of DISTRICTS for review, consideration and approval prior to the final approval of, and commitment to, undertaking the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Contract No. 14-1-1A, and Baker Force Mains, Contract No. 14-1-2. NOW, THEREFORE,-BE IT RESOLVED by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14 of Orange County, California, as follows: 1. That the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14 of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the FINAL SUPPLEMENT EIR has been completed in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, and that the DISTRICTS have reviewed and considered the information contained in said FINAL SUPPLEMENT EIR prior to approval of, or commitment to, -3- the Project. Said FINAL SUPPLMENT EIR is composed of the following elements: A. A Draft Supplement Environmental Impact Report, "Draft Supplement No. 1 to the Final Environmental Impact Report on Proposed* Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13 re Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Contracts Nos. 14-1-1A and 14-1-1B, and Baker Force Mains, Contract No. 14-1-2°, and all apendices thereto; B. Comments and responses to said DRAFT SUPPLEMENT EIR. 2. That the Boards of Directors of DISTRICTS do hereby find that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which will mitigate or avoid any significant adverse effects identified in the FINAL SUPPLEMENT EIR as specifically itemized below: A. Earth Impacts: Pipeline construction will result in grading, excavation and compaction of soil and temporary disruption to street and parking and recreation facilities along the pipeline route. Excavation and construction activities may result in some erosion and siltation into adjacent streams and storm drains. Findings: Work will be conducted in accordance with applicable city, County, state and Districts' requirements. The ground or streets will be restored to preconstruction or better condition. Erosion will be controlled by provision in the contract documents. B. Hydrology Impacts: The project route crosses the Santa Ana-Delhi -4- r Channel, Airport Storm Channel , Greenville-Banning Channel , %moll Santa Ana River, which are under the jurisdiction of the County of Orange and/or the the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Findings: The impact of the proposed project on the flood control channels is limited to the construction period. Upon construction completion the channels will return to their normal operating capacities and means. All work will be in accordance with applicable permit provisions including allowances for the proposed improvements to the Santa Ana River. C. Biota Impacts: The majority of the proposed sewer line route will be located in public roadway. There is one section of the proposed pipeline that will be located along the northern boundary of the Mesa Verde Country Club; this portion will affect approximately 30 trees and/or larger shrubs. Findings: Trees and shrubs will be replaced or replanted on a 1:1 basis unless other arrangements are made with the property owner when the easement is acquired. D. Noise Impacts: Project implementation will generate short-term noise levels from alignment construction activities and long-term noise levels from future sewer maintenance repair activities. Findings: Work hours and equipment mufflers will meet applicable noise ordinances. E. Land Use -5- Impacts: Project excavation and construction activities will cause minor disruptions to residential , small businesses and v airport facilities that are proximal to the pipeline route. The pipeline will require an easement from the Mesa Verde Country Club Golf Course and in an existing parking lot for an office building located at 1520 Nutmeg Place. Findings: Access will be maintained by at least one ingress/egress point at all times for each property. The portion of the pipeline proposed through the John Wayne Parking lot, under the freeway and in Airport Loop and Airway Avenue will cause minor disruption to small commercial and industrial uses through the partial closure of Airway Avenue. Emergency access will be maintained during construction. F. Transportation and Circulation Impacts: Traffic congestion, particularly during the peak hours, can be expected on that stretch of roadway being impacted by construction activities. The major intersections, i.e., Baker/Harbor, Baker/Fairview, Baker/Bristol , and Baker/Red Hill , are particularly susceptible to traffic congestion. Construction activities in the parking lot between Deodar Avenue and Cinnamon Avenue may temporarily disrupt businesses located on that site. Construction activities along Airway Avenue may temporarily limit vehicle access to the MillionAir Fixed-Base Operations, Crash/Fire Rescue Station No. 33 and the Martin Aviation Hangar. Parking in the North Parking Lot of John Wayne Airport may also temporarily disrupt -6- airport patrons. Construction activities associated with the L proposed project may temporarily impact publc bus services to residents and businesses in the area. Bus stops may be blocked and bus routes displaced temporarily during construction. Construction activities will occur in school zones on Gisler Avenue at Gibraltar Avenue and on Baker Street at Babb Street. These construction activities could interfere with the normal flow of children to and from school and potentially create hazardous situations. Construction of the project will require an encroachment permit to tunnel under the San Diego Freeway between Airport Loop Road and the airport parking lot. Findings: All construction will require traffic detour plans approved by applicable local agendies. Tunnels will•be used under major intersections to minimize congestion. Adequate signage will alert motorists of the construction. These requirements will be included within the contract documents. G. Recreation Impacts: Implementation of the proposed project will require a permanent easement area of approximately 1/2-acre through the Mesa Verde Country Club Golf Course. Findings: Construction within the golf course will be limited to temporary and permanent easement areas. A temporary fence will separate the construction area from the active golf course. H. Utilities Impacts: Excavation activities may potentially disrupt electrical , natural gas, water, sewer and telephone lines -7- located along the pipeline route. Findings: All utilities will be maintained to all properties. Temporary connections will be made when necessary. I. Health and Safety Impacts: Portions of the proposed pipeline alignment are located near schools which may create hazardous situations for children at crosswalks and along school routes. The open trench, parked machinery and stockpiled dirt may appear to be an attractive play area to children able to reach the construction site. During limited periods when tie-ins with existing facilities occur or when operations nuisances commence odor and noise may occur. Findings: Trenches will be fenced or plated on all off hours. Work will be scheduled, to the extent possible, to vacation periods near schools. J. Aesthetics Impacts: Short-term visual impacts from machinery, trenching, and dirt pilings will occur along each segment of the proposed alignment during construction. Findings: The construction contract will require that the construction areas be kept neat and clean and dust be kept to the minimum. K. Economic Factors Impacts: Districts funds are available to complete the projects. Additir.,ial revenue-raising actions may be required in the future. Auditional jobs will be created through the -8- design, construction and the administration of the contracts. Higher sewer use and connection fees are anticipated. L Findings: All new construction is paid for by the collection of fees from developers. L. Growth-Inducing Impacts of the Proposed Project Impacts: Improvement and expansion of the sewer conveyance system is designed to accommodate projected growth based on land use plans of the various areas within the service area. Findings: Implementation of the proposed project will not in and of itself promote additional growth to the service areas. 3. That the Boards of Directors of DISTRICTS further find that changes, alterations or conditions have been incorporated into the projects contemplated in the FINAL SUPPLEMENT EIR which will substantially mitigate or avoid the signficant effects identified in the DRAFT SUPPLEMENT EIR. Certain of the significant effects cannot be fully mitigated. The short-term impacts, including land use changes, traffic control, construction noise, visual impacts from construction, may continue to be significant after all feasibly known and identified mitigation measures are implemented. The 1985 EIR discussed these impacts; they are treated again within the FINAL SUPPLEMENT EIR. The DISTRICTS Director of Engineering will be responsible for overseeing the implementation of the mitigation measures. 4. That certain changes or alterations, (e.g. mitigation measures) are required in or incorporated into the Project through the permitting responsibility and jurisdiction of a public agency other than County Sanitation Districts. These changes, identified in the 1985 EIR, are not changed by the FINAL SUPPLEMENT EIR. V -9- 5. That the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14 of Orange County, California have balanced the benefits of the proposed Project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the Project. The Boards do hereby further find, determine and state, pursuant to the provisions of Section 15093 of the State Guidelines, that the occurrence of those certain significant environmental effects identified in the EIR (1985) and set forth in paragraphs above have been found acceptable and will be permitted without further mitigation due to the following overriding considerations. A. The Project is necessary to accommodate wastewater flows from ongoing and future development approved by the local land use authorities. The DISTRICTS is a single-purpose agency with the responsibility to collect, treat and dispose of wastewater generated within the DISTRICTS' service area. Construction of the Project identified in the FINAL SUPPLEMENT EIR is necessary to provide sewerage conveyance facilities to serve development approved by the cities and County after separate environmental review by the approving entity as identified in local land use plans. B. The Boards of Directors find that implementation of the Project alternatives identified in the FINAL SUPPLEMENT EIR are infeasible as follows: 1) No-Project Alternative. The DISTRICTS' sole function is to provide sewerage faciltiies to adequately collect, treat and dispose of wastewater. If the no-project alternative is implemented and no new facilities are built to accommodate city and County approved land uses, the sewer system will become unreliable with potential raw sewage backup in the streets and other urban areas and discharge untreated wastewater to the ocean. The -10- No-project addressed in this FINAL SUPPLEMENT EIR would result in construction of the sewer as originally designated in the EIR of a size and alignment which would result in reduced capacity to convey ever-increasing flows as well as serious impacts on traffic on more heavily-traveled arterials than originally noted in 1985. 2) Provision for Lesser/Greater Capacity. Installation of smaller pipes than identified would not meet planned land use development and redevelopment of the cities and County, thus limiting growth or necessitating construction of additional pipelines at a higher cost in the near future. Installation of pipelines larger than identified in the FINAL SUPPLEMENT EIR is not warranted at this time. The DISTRICTS' responsibility is to serve anticipated growth, as determined by the local municipalities, not to act as the vehicle by which growth is induced or restricted. 3) Alternative Pipeline Route. Various underground and aboveground alternatives were considered before the aboveground alternative across the golf course was chosen. In order. to place the sewer line underground across the golf course or under Gisler Avenue, it would have been necessary to either construct a longer siphon, which would caused maintenance problems, maintenance, or to construct a pump station which would have resulted in reduced reliability and increased costs. The basis for establishing the profile of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor is the hydraulic control which sets the downstream elevation of the pipeline. This point is the elevation of the headworks in the treatment plant in Fountain Valley. From this -11- point, the pipeline profile is extended upstream at a minimum pipe size and slope combination to carry the design flow. A siphon will be required beneath the Santa Ana River and the Greenville-Banning Flood Control Channel regardless of the alignment selected because of their elevations. If a siphon is kept to less than 600 feet in length and designed properly, the Districts can maintain the siphon with relatively high reliability. The solids that may collect can be removed routinely, minimizing the probability of a blockage. A siphon can only be maintained at this locatin for less than 600 feet if the sewer line is kept at an elevation above the existing ground level . This means that if the alignment is across the golf course, a portion of the pipeline will have to be above the existing ground level at the golf course. Similarly, if the alignment is to be down Gisler Avenue, a portion of the pipeline will have to be above the existing level of Gisler in order to maintain a siphon that is less than 600 feet. Three alternative alignments were addressed in the Project Report: (1) an alignment following Washington Avenue and California Street; (2) an alignment following Washington Avenue, Illinois Street and Indiana Avenue; and (3) an alignment continuing in Gisler Avenue and through the Mesa Verde Country Club golf course as recommended. The first alignment would be very shallow, create a tremendous burden on the surrounding residential community during construction, and would be very expensive due to have encumbrance of existing utilities along the route. Many service connections to -12- several of the utilities would require relocation and most likely ti..J additional utility mains would be required within the street due to the shallow depth of this large trunk sewer pipe. The environmental effects would be extreme traffic congestion and disruption of access to residences during construction. The second alignment similarly results in a very shallow depth, requires a siphon beneath the Greenville-Banning Channel that is too long for the Districts' to maintain and would be very disruptive to the surrounding residential community. The environmental effects would be similar to the first alignment in disruption of residences during construction. The third alternative, that through the golf course, involves the least disruption to residences during construction, and would result in partically no permanent environmental change. There are additional costs involved in purchasing the necessary construction and permanent easements. After the project is completed under this alternative, the only change would be a sloped area on the rough of one fairway of the golf course as opposed to the present flat area on the rough. Environmentally, this is the least disruptive of all of the alternatives considered. A variation of the third alternative in which the pipeline would be placed along Gisler Avenue presents several unsatisfactory results. Gisler Avenue just west of Washington Avenue falls below the elevation of the interceptor pipe. This requires the siphon beneath the Greenville-Banning Channel to be extended to a total length of approximately 1,600 feet. The Districts are currently ;1.01 -13- unable to clean this length of siphon with current technology. Further, to be compatible with the current planning for the l.. proposed bridge over the Santa Ana River at Gisler Avenue, the pipeline must be below the existing Gisler Avenue elevation at Vermont Avenue. This means that the Districts would have a very unservicable siphon if the gravity line is to be used and the pipe is to be placed in or along Gisler Avenue. Another alternative to an all-gravity system would be to construct a pump station at some point west of the Gisler Avneue and Washington Avenue intersection. A pump station, however, has many disadvantages to al all gravity flow system. It's life cycle costs are significantly greater than those of the all-gravity system, requires continual operation and maintenance attention, would significantly affect the reliability of the overall system in that there are many additional possibilities for malfunctions, requires a significant structure which would be much more damaging to the aesthetics of the neighborhood than the landscaped and covered box across the rough of the golf course presently being considered. After considering all of these alternatives, the route proposed in the FINAL SUPPLEMENT EIR is the least damaging environmentally. The proposed route will enter the golf course near Vermont Avenue. A portion of the rough area of one fairway will be regraded and landscaped. The interceptor design can continue as a gravity flow system throughout this area with a siphon that is capable of being maintained by the Districts, resulting in increased reliability. A -14- box conduit was selected to lessen the vertical height of the facility and to provide for a line that will appear to be completely underground after the regrading and relocation of the existing trees on the easement area. During construction, this alignment will provide the least disruption to neighbors and the golf course. After construction, it will provide the least disruption of the beauty of the golf course and the neighborhood. C. For the reasons set forth above, it is not economically feasible to further mitigate or avoid the environmental effects hereinabove identified. 6. That the Board Secretary is authorized and directed to file the Notice of Determination and any other documents in accordance with the requirements of CEQA and the Districts' CEQA Guidelines. PASSED AND ADOPTED AT THE REGULAR MEETING HELD JULY 11, 1990. -15- 0.ESPONSEO joN HENF NR�PN12pS3s 10 R1 ON NSPE i D RE Nit A Doll tPPPj9E�pRNPS 1�S5 N�01NPN0513 NO• D1S, RE- CEPTlstVIOR PND Na?, 00.0g 90 p0 l SON NO � PREPAPED FOR'. IN SjR1G15 OP OOUNVNGE�p�NtON GpVEN j9-g12� 1) 10gg4 E E�As OA 92 FOUNZPiN VPi'l pREPPRED g� Pl SERg1OE5 tRASVSIV 1ON IwCA 92114NU£ Ul 16g IRVINE g63'7 p00 ��141 NAV igg0 4549I142 r r FINAL r RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 TO THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PROPOSED REORGANIZATION NO. 79 FORMATION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NO. 7 AND 13 r RE: r BAKER-GISLER INTERCEPTOR AND BAKER FORCE MAINS SCH NO. 89010077 PREPARED FOR: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92728-8127 r PREPARED BY: ULTRASYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 16845 VON KARMAN AVENUE IRVINE, CA 92714 (714) 863-7000 r r r 4549/142 MAY 1990 r r r TABLE OF CONTENTS — Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.1 Final Supplement Environmental Impact Report . . . 1 1.2 Review Period . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.3 Incorporation of Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 r 2.0 LIST OF COMMENTORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.1 Government Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.2 Public Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3.0 SUMMARY NEW MITIGATION MEASURES . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 4.0 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 .. 4.1 Government Agency Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 4.1.1 David C. Nunenkamp . . . . . . . 5 Office of Planning and Research 4.1.2 Robert F. Joseph . . . . 6 California Department of Transportation 4.1.3 Christine Edwards . . . . 7 County of Orange/John Wayne Airport 4.1.4 Chris Caliendo . . . . 9 County of Orange/John Wayne Airport 4.1.5 Steven A. Stackhouse . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 City of Irvine 4.1.6 John Carlson . . . . . . . . . . 12 r Costa Mesa Water District 4.2 Public Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 r 4.2.1 Robert L. Klotz . . . . . . . . 13 Drummy Garrett King & Harrison 4.2.2 Ernest E. Sanchez . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Sullivan, Workman & Dee r APPENDICES Appendix A: Written Comments Received r r r 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report This volume responds to comments on the Draft Supplement to the final NO. 1 Environmental Impact Report on the proposed reorganiza- tion No. 79, Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13; State Clearinghouse Number 89010077. This response to comments document ("Response to Comments"), prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), provides both written responses to comments received on the Supplement and provides, for public review, additional information concerning the proposed Project as requested by the Sanitation "e Districts Nos. 7 and 13 and/or those agencies or individuals providing comment thereupon. Pursuant to Section 15132 of the State CEQA Guidelines, this Response to Comments volume, the SEIR and any other information designated by the Districts will constitute the Final Supplement, which will be utilized by the Sanitation Districts to form the environmental »= basis for reaching a decision on the proposed Baker-Gisler Interceptor and Baker Force Mains. The State CEQA Guidelines (Section 15088(c)) authorize this document to be structured as a separate section in the Final Supple- mental No. 1. Although printed as a separate component to the Final Supplemental No. 1, this Response to Comment represents an integral part of the Project's environmental analysis. 1.2 Review Period On February 5, 1990 the Office of Planning and Research, acting in their role as the State Clearinghouse, established a forty- five (45) day review period for the Supplement, concluding on March 20, 1990. 1.3 Incorporation of Comments Section 15044 of the State CEQA Guidelines grants any person or entity authority to submit comments to the Lead Agency concerning the environmental effects of a proposed project. Section 15088 of the State CEQA Guidelines provides that: The Lead Agency evaluate comments on environmental issues received from persons who reviewed the draft EIR and shall prepare a written response. The Lead Agency shall respond to comments received during the noticed comment period and any extensions and may respond to late comments. r 1 d County Sanitation District March 14 , 1990 Page Two Draft Supplement No. 1 , is totally inadequate in that it has failed either to address or adequately discuss the subject matter areas set forth above. We submit that the proposed document should be rejected. Without undue detail, we point out the following: 1. With respect to risks and hazards of accidents resulting from the operation of the proposed facilities, there is no discussion whatever as to the existence of any hazard caused by a failure of t eFi system or a major accident or emergency after the system is installed. A 90-inch sewer pipe and associated facilities is a major public project. What happens to the environment and the community if there is a serious operational accident or breakdown with respect to the pipe of the related facilities? What are the risks of operational as distinguished from the risks of construction? Why doesn' t Draft Supplement No. 1 even discuss the subject? 2 . With respect to the creation of health hazards because of leaks or any other aspect of the operation of the facilities, again there is no adequate discussion of the subject matter . The authors of the document seem to assume that the system is safe and flawless and operations will never result in a problem. The document does acknowledge that spills and odors may occur at the time of initial hookup. No discussion at all, however , is made with respect to spills or other occurrences that may be inherent in the operation of the system as proposed. We submit that the law and common sense require such discussion. No human engineering system exists which is error free or problem free. ® 3. With respect to disruption of business during construction, etc. , the Draft Supplement is not only again inadequate but may be misleading. Page 20 of the document states that there will be "minor disruptions to residential small business . . Further , page 53 of the report, referring to our client' s parking lot, states: "Interruption of this parking lot is expected to last approximately one week. " Totally absent from the report is meaningful discussion of the cumulative effect that will be had on business and residences during the length of the project. Any business is impacted by construction in the area as well as construction immediately in front of the business. In our client' s case , for example , business will be affected much longer than the "one week" referred to on page 53 . Enclosed herewith is a letter of the Sanitation District dated June 21, 1989 regarding our client' s property. The letter states "Your site will be impacted approximately five months. " Obviously, the writers o t e Dra t Supplement have ignored the known length of impact of the project All responses to the noticing and distribution of Supplement No. 1 have been included and addressed in this Response to Comments document. Those written comments, which have been included in the Response to Comments, which do not address the adequacy or completeness of the Supplement, raise environmental issues, or request the incor- poration of additional environmental information have not been specifi- cally addressed. A substantive response to such comments is not appropriate within the context of CEQA and is, therefore, not provided within this document. All written comments received in response to the SEIR have been included in Appendix A (Correspondence) of this document. 2 2.0 LIST OF COMMENTORS 2.1 Government Agencies David C. Nunenkamp, Chief Office of Permit Assistance Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 d Robert F. Joseph Advance Planning Branch California Department of Transportation District 12 2501 Pullman Street Santa Ana, CA 92705 Christine Edwards, Chief Airport Operations & Facilities John Wayne Airport County of Orange 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite L-2 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Chris Caliendo, Project Management John Wayne Airport County of Orange 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite L-2 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Steven A. Stackhouse, Manager of Development Services Community Development Department City of Irvine One Civic Center Plaza Irvine, CA 92713 .� John Carlson, Associate Civil Engineer Mesa Consolidated Water District ,7 P.O. Box 5008 1965 Placentia Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92628-5008 2.2 Public Comments Robert L. Klotz Crummy, Garrett, King & Harrison 3200 Park Center Drive, Twelfth Floor Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Ernest E. Sanchez Sullivan, Workman & Dee 800 South Figueroa Street, Twelfth Floor 'd Los Angeles, CA 90017-2521 3 3.0 SUMMARY OF NEW MITIGATION MEASURES This section contains mitigation measures which have been developed in response to comments contained in the following Section 4.0. These new mitigation measures shall be added to the mitigation measures previously stated in the SEIR. ° The applicant shall coordinate with John Wayne Airport operations and facilities prior to the initiation of the project's construction activities. ° The access to John Wayne Airport and the construction areas at the airport shall be maintained during the construction phase of the Project. ° In conjunction with the submittal of applications for preliminary grading permits, the County of Orange Sanitation Districts shall submit a construction detour plan for any planned detours within Irvine City limits. The plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City's Director of Public Works. 4 4.0 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS 4.1 Government Aaencv Comments 4.1.1 David C. Nunenkamp State Clearinghouse Office of Planning Research 1400 Tenth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Comment 01: The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named environmental document to selected state agencies for review. The review period is closed and none of the state agencies have comments. This letter acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental documents, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Response 01: This comment is acknowledged. V r it d m e 5 4.1 .2 Robert F. Joseph Advance Planning Branch California Department of Transportation, District 12 2501 Pullman Street Santa Ana, CA 92705 Comment 02: Caltrans District 02 has no comment other than the project will require an Encroachment Permit be issued should any part of the project cross over or under a State facility. From the project description and figures showing alignment, your project will cross State ROW at SR-73, SR-55 and 1-405. Please correct the text in paragraph four on page 57 as an Encroachment Permit is required to cross under the Newport and Corona Del Mar Freeways. Response 02: An encroachment permit has been obtained from Caltrans for those portions of the pipeline route which cross over or under state right-of-ways; Corona Del Mar (73), Newport Freeway (55) and San Diego Freeway (I-405) . The text (page 57, paragraph 4) is hereby amended to state that an Encroachment Permit is also required to cross under the Newport and Corona Del Mar Freeway. 6 4.1.3 Christine Edwards Airport Operations & Facilities John Wayne Airport County of Orange 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite L-2 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Comment 03: Page 11 - North Clear Zone Parking Lot encroachment during construction should not be a problem if it is adequately coordinated with us. .d Response 03: This comment is acknowledged. The applicant intends to coordinate with John Wayne Airport operations and facilities prior to the initiation of construction activities. Comment 04: Page 26 - Construction activities along Airway Avenue have the potential for limiting access to Airport businesses including Millionaire, Martin's westside hangar tenants as well as tiedown tenants using the Baker entrance and Airport and Fire Department vehicles using the Paularino entrance. The draft supplement indicates that access to these _ areas will be maintained at all times and that construc- tion will be coordinated with us and our affected tenants. Past experience indicates that careful coordination and continual monitoring during construc- tion will be necessary to ensure that adequate access is maintained. Response 04: This comment is acknowledged. Comment 05: Page 63 - The EIR indicates that one lane will be maintained for each direction of traffic on Airway Avenue. Since Paularino (which crosses Airway Avenue) is a primary access route for emergency vehicles, sufficient space absolutely must be maintained at all _ times for them to cross the intersection of Paularino and Airway Avenue. Response 05: This comment is acknowledged. 7 Comment 06: Additionally, I am unclear as to the timing of this construction. If it is to begin prior to completion of terminal or hydrant fuel farm construction, airport construction access via Airport Loop Road could be adversely affected. e, Response 06: This comment is acknowledged. See Response to Comment k03. 8 d 4.1.4 Chris Caliendo Project Management John Wayne Airport County of Orange 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite L-2 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Comment 07: The Land Use Section 5.5.3 states "access to private properties will be maintained during the construction phase of the project". John Wayne Airport is not private property. JWA needs to have its access assured. - Response 07: The access to John Wayne Airport and the construction areas at the airport will be maintained during the construction phase of the Project. Comment 08: The Transportation and Circulation Section 5.6.3 fails to mention access to JWA via the Airport Loop Road gate. v Response 08: See previous Response to Comment #07. Comment 09: The Health and Safety Section 5.9.3 needs to be amended to include provisions for Airport security while working on Airport property. This section should also address FAA construction regulations. A Form 7460 will need to be filed with the FAA, listing all construction equip- ment (i .e. , cranes, etc.) that will be used on Airport property. The FAA will then issue a Notice of Proceed, listing mitigation measures and operational procedures. Response 09: See Response to Comment #03. Also, the applicant has filed a Form 7460 with the FAA and has received all ® required permits. 9 r r 4.1.5 Steven A. Stackhouse Community Development Department City of Irvine One Civic Center Plaza Irvine, CA 92713 Comment 10: Please explain and identify in the Final EIR what additional increase in capacity 18 inches in diameter, - will provide, and what studies will be needed for CEQA compliance. Response 10: The change in size was not made to provide additional capacity, but to allow for "freeboard", i .e. the e capacity for unknown circumstances (storm flow, unex- pected land use changes, surging, and flow equaliza- tion). Studies necessary for this project include: soils and geology, hydrology, biota, noise, traffic and circulation, health and safety and aesthetics. a Comment 11: Please explain in the Final EIR why items checked off in the NOP Initial Study as "No" were considered not to have an impact. Response 11: At the time the Initial Study for this project was - filled out CEQA did not require "no" responses to be vy explained. Comment 12: Earth Resources - Please identify any disruptions to the outer walls of the Santa Ana River channel for the sewer line connection to Fountain Valley. Response 12: Prior to construction of the sewer conveyance facility at the Santa Ana River channel detailed engineering designs and plans will be submitted to the US Army Corps of the Engineers for approval . Comment 13: Water Resources - Please explain in the Final EIR what significant impacts may result from the increased sewer line capacity of 72" to 90" on the ocean, given treated waste will be discharged into it. r Response 13: This comment is beyond the scope of the SEIR. A r 10 w ` Comment 14: Noise - Please explain in the Final EIR what increase in noise, above the ambient noise level, will occur due to project construction. Response 14: Noise associated with construction activities is expected to intermittently exceed vicinity ambient noise levels. As stated on page 47 of the SEIR construction noise levels may exceed 90 dBA at a distance of fifty feet. Existing ambient noise levels along the construc- tion route average 60 to 70 dBA at a distance of fifty feet depending on time of day, amount of traffic, and other background noise sources. Therefore, a short- term intermittent noise increase of 20 to 30 dBA could be experienced at a distance of fifty feet along the construction route. The construction activities will be short term in any one area, thereby minimizing any impacts. The proposed project will comply with County and City noise requirements. w Comment 15: Transportation/Circulation - Explain how many and from where parking spaces will be removed. Since the City of Irvine prohibits on-street parking on major arterials, how will this project relocate parking spaces? Response 15: Construction through parking lots and easement areas shall be phased and scheduled so as to minimize disrup- tions to existing uses. d Comment 16: Please include in the Final EIR the following mitigation measure: In conjunction with the submittal of applications for preliminary grading permits, the County of Orange Sanitation Districts shall submit a construction detour plan for any planned detours within Irvine City limits. The plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City's Director of Public Works. Response 16: This comment is acknowledged and shall be incorporated into the Final EIR. Comment 17: The Final EIR needs to explain how the County shall coordinate with John Wayne Airport and owners of affected buildings to minimize disruption to existing operations during project construction. Response 17: See Response to Comment#03. 11 m r r 4.1.6 John Carlson Mesa Consolidated Water District P.O. Box 5008 Costa Mesa, CA 92628-5008 Comment 18: The Mesa Consolidated Water District has no comments r regarding the subject supplement. Please keep us informed regarding the construction schedule. Response 18: This comment is acknowledged. r r r r r 12 r 4.2 Public Comments 4.2.1 Robert L. Klotz Drummy, Garrett, King & Harrison 3200 Park Center Drive, Twelfth Floor ,e Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Comment 19: Biota - The draft EIR Supplement states that only "approximately 12 trees and/or large shrubs" will be a, impacted by the proposed project. The District, however, has previously acknowledged that at least 30 mature trees will be impacted and that the majority of these affected trees probably cannot be successfully transplanted. Given the importance of these mature trees to the golf course, the Club believes the loss of these trees constitutes a significant impact. At a minimum, mitigation should include replacement of the lost trees with comparable mature specimens and adequate provisions guaranteeing survival of the replacement trees. Response 19: The analysis of the number of trees and shrubs performed for the SEIR was based on an aerial photograph included as Figure 4, Sheet 1 in the Revised Project Report for Joint Sewage Conveyance Facilities to serve Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14. A field survey was not performed to determine the exact number of trees and/or shrubs displaced by the project. There are about 30 large trees and bushes which will be removed, about 20 of which are Myporia and Cypress. The applicant does recognize the significance of the trees and shrubs along this section of the project and will replant or replace all removed trees and shrubs at a ratio of 1:1 or pay for replanting by the Club. Comment 20: Noise - Construction noise will inevitably disrupt and significantly affect golf course operations, and the proposed mitigation measures are inadequate to avoid this significant effect. As additional mitigation, construction should be scheduled at this site during the season of minimal course use and the cessation of all construction activities during any major event at the Club should be required. Response 20: The applicant is currently in contact with the golf ® course owners and plans to coordinate all construction activities with the owners so as to minimize any 13 potential impacts to the golf course as a result of project implementation. ® Comment 21: Land Use - (Pages 51 - 54) - The draft EIR Supplement states that the project "will be compatible with other existing uses in the area since the pipelines will be beneath the ground's surface." This statement is incorrect. The project, as proposed through the Mesa Verde Country Club, involves the construction of an approximately 6 foot high by 8 foot wide aboveground box sewer, a large above-ground structure, and a pipeline access ramp. [The draft EIR fails to even describe the .," use of this large aboveground structure.] Response 21: The Draft EIR was in error in not giving a fair descrip- tion of the proposed conduit within golf club property. The box conduit will be above ground. The golf course side will be filled with earth and landscaped to blend as well as possible with the existing rolling golf course greens. It has been proposed that the top of the box conduit be used as a golf cart track. A fence or wall would be provided on the northerly side of the conduit. Comment 22: The construction of these obtrusive facilities will constitute a continuing impact on the club's golf course operations. Moreover, the constructin of these facilit- ies will effectively terminate the Club's abutter's right of access to Gisler Avenue over most of its length. Termination of these access rights will preclude alternative uses, which would otherwise be feasible, or the area of the Club adjacent to these facilities. Response 22: Pipeline conduit will be above ground for about two- thirds of the distance between the Costa Mesa Bluff and the Greenville-Banning Channel . The County of Orange has plans to build a bridge over the Santa Ana River and the adjacent Greenville-Banning Channel . The fill for the abutment will raise Gisler and partially block access from the most westerly portion of the golf course. It is true that a barrier will be raised, however, the effect that the sewer has on access to Gisler Avenue will be reduced when the bridge road improvement project takes place. The bridge project is not yet scheduled. While the sewer project will affect access to Gisler Avenue it will not terminate the right- of-access. 14 Comment 23: The draft EIR Supplement also states that there are "no ingress/egress routes for.residences or businesses which will be blocked due to construction." This statement 'a is also inaccurate. Construction through the Mesa Verde County Club will block the existing access of the Club to Gisler Avenue during construction. Response 23: At least one access will be maintained to Gisler Avenue during project construction for the Mesa Verde Country Club as well as one access to each residence and bus- iness. Comment 24: The draft EIR Supplement also describes the easement required from the Club as measuring approximately 20 feet wide by 1,000 feet in length. In fact, the easement demanded by the District is approximately 25 wide by 1000 feet in length. An additional temporary construction easement has been demanded that is also approximately 25 feet wide by 1,000 feet in length. Response 24: The statement in the SEIR on page 52, paragraph 4 is „ incorrect and should read, "This easement is approxi- mately 0.57 acres and measures approximately 25 feet wide by 1,000 feet in length." The applicant has requested this easement from the Mesa Verde Country Club Golf Course owners. Comment 25: Transportation/Circulation (Pages 55-64) - As noted in the preceding section on Land Use, the proposed project would effectively terminate the Club's abutter's rights m of access to Gisler Avenue along most of its length thereby foreclosing the potential for residential development in the area of the Club adjacent to the proposed project. This should be considered an unmiti- gated impact. Response 25: See Response to Comment #22. Comment 26: In addition, the denial of use of the existing access road during construction will significantly impact golf club operations and mitigation should be provided. Response 26: See Response to Comment #23. Comment 27: Recreation (Page 65) - The draft EIR Supplement describes the easement required from Mesa Verde Country s, Club during construction as "25 feet wide by 1,000 feet in length" and states that the "permanent easement area 15 will be 20 feet wide by 1,000 feet in length." As previously noted, these statements are incorrect. The permanent easement demanded by the District is actually approximately 25 feet wide by 1,000 feet in length and an additional temporary construction easement has been demanded that is 25 feet wide by 1,000 feet in length. ® Response 27: See Response to Comment R24. Comment 28: The conclusion that no significant impacts will occur is also unwarranted. During the construction period, impacts would certainly be significant unless construc- tion is scheduled to avoid peak seasonal usage of the Club and unless cessation of construction is required during any major event. Moreover, the removal of mature landscaping, coupled with the conspicuous aboveground design of the facilities and the apparent necessity for on-going maintenance through the unidentified large accessory structure, all suggest that the long-term impact to the golf course must be considered signifi- cant. Response 28: See Responses to Comments #19, k20 and 121. Comment 29: Health and Safety (Pages 72-76) - Although the draft EIR ® Supplement acknowledges that the project may entail nuisances including "noise, dust, leaks, odor, filth, overflows of untreated waste water, and/or traffic congestion", it nevertheless concludes that no signifi- cant impacts will occur. The analysis in this section with respect to both short-term construction impacts and long-term impacts is plainly inadequate. In particular, this section fails to meaningfully discuss the long- term potential for leaks, odor, spills and overflows of untreated waste water. Since a malfunction at the District's Fountain Valley Plant recently resulted in a 250,000 gallon sewage spill through backed-up sewers in this area, the risk of such major nuisances is ® apparent and should be fully addressed. Response 29: The risk of failure from the gravity line is extremely low. The District operates approximately 800 miles of gravity line and has experienced very few failures. In addition, there have been no known reported leaks from this type of sewer line. The project applicant will be responsible for maintenance and repair of the proposed sewer lines. 16 The construction of this new sewage conveyance line will upgrade the existing facilities. The need for this upgrading and improved capacity is demonstrated by the over-flowing of the existing facilities as described by the commentor. Comment 30: Aesthetics (Page 77-78) - The Club believes that the aesthetic impact of this project on Club property should be considered significant. In addition to the short- term impacts during construction, the long-term aesthetic impact of this obtrusive design is apparent. ' Construction of the proposed aboveground 90 inch sewer line together with the associated aboveground structure and the loss of 30 mature trees will necessarily entail significant visual impacts unless fully and carefully mitigated. Mitigation, at a minimum, should include replacement of the lost trees, visual screening of the associated structure with mature landscaping, and installation of adequate landscape screens between Gisler Avenue and the golf course. Replacement landscaping should utilize mature specimens and the 'm District should provide assurances of its viability for a reasonable period. Response 30: This comment is noted. Design of the fill adjacent to the sewer conduit will include landscaping to minimize visual effect on the golf course. The trees will be replaced as previously discussed in Response to Comment #19. See also Responses to Comments 20 and 21. Comment 31: Alternatives to Proposed Action (Pages 81-83) - The alternatives discussion in the draft EIR Supplement is legally inadequate in that it fails to discuss a reasonable range of alternatives to the project or to the location of the project. In particular, the EIR fails to consider relocation of the project to avoid the impacts to the Mesa Verde Country Club and also fails to consider any alternatives to the proposed project design (e.g. , the construction of an underground sewer through the Mesa Verde Country Club) which could avoid significant impacts on the Club. Response 31: Various underground and above ground alternatives were considered before the above ground alternative across the golf course property was chosen. In order to place the sewer line underground either across the golf course or under Gisler Avenue, it would have been necessary either to construct a longer siphon, which would have been almost impossible to maintain, or to construct a pump station which would have resulted in reduced reliability. 17 It is important to understand the basis for establishing the profile of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor pipeline. d The hydraulic control , which sets the downstream elevation of the pipeline, is at the existing headworks in the treatment plant. From this point, the pipeline profile is extended upstream at a minimum pipe size and slope combination to carry the design flow. This profile is, in essence, fixed for all alignments. A siphon will be required beneath the Santa Ana River and the Greenville-Banning Flood Control Channel regardless of the alignment selected due to their relative elevations. If a siphon is kept to less than 600 feet in length and designed properly, the Districts can maintain the siphon with relatively high reliability. Solids are removed routinely using the Districts' existing technology, minimizing the probability of blockage. A siphon can only be maintained at this location for less than 600 feet if the sewer line is kept at an elevation above the existing ground level . This means that if the alignment is across the golf course, a portion of the pipeline will have to be above the existing ground level at the golf course. Similarly, if the alignment is to be down Gisler Street, a portion of he pipeline will have to be above the existing level of Gisler Street in order to maintain a siphon that is less than 600 feet. The Project Report studied three alignments west of Washington Avenue to Reclamation Plant No. 1: (1) an alignment following Washington Avenue and California Street; (2) an alignment following Washington Avenue, Illinois Street and Indiana Avenue; and (3) an alignment continuing in Gisler Avenue and through the Mesa Verde Country Club golf course as recommended. The first alignment would be very shallow, create a tremendous burden on the surrounding residential community during construction, and would be very expensive due to the heavy encumbrance of existing utilities along the route. Many service connections to several of the utilities would require relocation and most likely additional utility mains would be required within the street due to the shallow depth of this large trunk sewer pipe. The environmental effects would be extreme traffic congestion and disruption of access to residences during construction. The second alignment similarly results in a very shallow depth, requires a siphon beneath the Greenville-Banning Flood Control Channel that is too long for the District to maintain, and would be very disruptive to the surrounding residential community. The environmental 18 .d m effects would be similar to the first alignment in disruption of the residences during construction. The third alternative, that through the golf course, involves the least disruption to residences during construction, and would result in practically no permanent environmental change. After the entire protect is completed, the only change will be a sloped area on the rough of one fairway of the golf course as a opposed to the present flat area on the rough of one fairway. Environmentally, this is the least disruptive of all of the alternatives considered. A variation of the third alternative in which the pipeline would be placed along Gisler Avenue presents several unsatisfactory results. Gisler Avenue just ,r west of Washington Avenue falls below the elevation of the interceptor pipe. This requires the siphon beneath the Greenville-Banning Channel to be extended to a total length of approximately 1,600 feet. The 'r District is unable to clean this length of siphon with current technology. Further, to be compatible with the current planning of the proposed bridge over the .. Santa Ana River at Gisler Avenue, the pipeline must be below the existing Gisler Avenue elevation at Vermont Avenue. This means that the District will have a very ,r unserviceable siphon if a gravity line is to be used and the pipe is to be placed in or along Gisler Avenue. Another alternative to an all gravity system would be to construct a pump station at some point west of. the Gisler Avenue and Washington Avenue intersection. A pump station, however, has many disadvantages to an all gravity flow system. It's life cycle costs are significantly greater than those of the all gravity system. It requires continual operation and maintenance r attention. It would significantly affect the reliability of the overall system in that there are many additional possibilities for malfunctions, such as mechanical malfunctions, loss of electrical power, etc. A pump station of this magnitude, moreover, requires a significant structure similar to the Main Street Pump Station which would be environmentally much more damaging to the aesthetics of the neighborhood than the landscaped and covered box across the rough of the golf course that is presently being considered. After considering all of these alternatives, it appears that the route that has been proposed across the golf course is the least environmentally damaging. The proposed route will enter the golf course near Vermont Avenue. A portion of the rough area of one fairway will .. 19 be regraded and landscaped. The interceptor design can continue as a gravity flow system throughout this area with a siphon that is capable of being cleaned using the Districts' current technology. This will result in increased reliability. A box conduit was selected to lessen the vertical height of the facility and to provide for a line that will appear to be completely underground after the regrading and relocation of the existing trees on the easement area. During construction, this alignment will provide the least disruption to neighbors and the golf course. After construction, it will provide the least disruption of the beauty of the golf course and the neighborhood. - Comment 32: The Club urges the District to reconsider the location and design of the proposed facilities to avoid the significant impacts on the Club of the project as presently proposed. Response 32: This comment is noted and should be taken into con- sideration by the decision-makers. r 20 4.2.2 Ernest E. Sanchez Sullivan, Workman & Dee 800 South Figueroa Street, Twelfth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017-2521 Comment 33: With respect to risks and hazards of accidents resulting ® from the operation of the proposed facilities, there is no discussion whatever as to the existence of any hazard caused by a failure of the system or a maior accident or emergency after the system is installed. A 90-inch sewer pipe and associated facilities is a major public project. What happens to the environment and the community if there is a serious operational accident or breakdown with respect to the pipe of the related facilities? What are the risks of operational as distinguished from the risks of construction? Why ^' doesn't Draft Supplement No. 1 even discuss the subject? Response 33: See Response to Comment k29. Comment 34: With respect to the creation of health hazards because of leaks or any other aspect of the operation of the r facilities, again there is no adequate discussion of the subject matter. The authors of the document seem to assume that the system is safe and flawless and opera- tions will never result in a problem. The document does acknowledge that spills and odors may occur at the time of initial hookup. No discussion at all , however, is made with respect to spills or other occurrences that may be inherent in the operation of the system as proposed. We submit that the law and common sense require such discussion. No human engineering system exists which is error free or problem free. Response 34: See Response to Comment #29. Comment 35: With respect to disruption of business during construc- tion, etc., the Draft Supplement is not only again inadequate but may be misleading. Page 20 of the document states that there will be "minor disruptions to residential small business. . ." Further, page 53 of the report, referring to our client's parking lot, states: "Interruption of this parking lot is expected to last approximately one week." Totally absent from .� the report is meaningful discussion of the cumulative effect that will be had on business and residences s 21 during the length of the project. Any business is impacted by construction in the area as well as con- struction immediately in front of the business. In our client's case, for example, business will be affected much longer than the "one week" referred to on page 53. Enclosed herewith is a letter of the Sanitation District ® dated June 21, 1989 regarding our client's property. The letter states "Your site will be impacted aooroxi- mately five months." Obviously, the writers of the ,9 Draft Supplement have ignored the known length of the project on businesses and have not attempted to discuss or assess the effect of that impact. 'm Response 35: The statement in the SEIR is accurate. Based on current engineering design and planning schedules the project is expected to cause an approximate one week interrup- tion in the above mentioned parking lot. The design and construction of the pipeline will be in compliance with the best available engineering practices and will be performed in the most timely manner possible. Comment 36: With respect to consideration of feasible alternatives to the proposed project, the authors of the Draft Supplement have given no consideration at all to the logical alternative of using the public right of way in Harbor Boulevard for the project. This alternative would eliminate the use of eminent domain. There is no discussion whatever of alternative project routes except a "no project" alternative (Alternative 1) and a Mace- Carraway-Cinnamon alternative (Alternative 2 in the document) . It simply does not make sense that there are no feasible alternative routing other than the above. Your report is legally required to discuss reasonably feasible alternative routing other than the above. Your report is legally required to discuss reasonably feasible possibilities, not just selected possibilities that the agency prefers to discuss. The discussions in the report of Alternative 1 and Alternative 2 are not reasoned discussions supported by data and facts set forth in the report. Such discussion as exists is conclusionary in nature and based on undocumented or inadequately explained assumptions. Such presentation and reasoning fails to meet the requirements of Califor- nia law. Response 36: This comment raises excellent points. In fact, several alternate alignments and means of conveying sewage to the Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant located on the west side of the Santa Ana River were examined. Some s of these alignments were discussed in the Project Report and earlier Environmental Impact Reports. The recom- 22 mended alignment is the extension of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor westerly in Baker Street to Harbor Boulevard to Deodar Avenue then northerly within a parking lot to Cinnamon Avenue. There were several alternative alignments to the recommended alignment study. The first is the construction of the interceptor sewer within an easement in public streets along Watson Avenue beginning near the intersection of Fairview Road and Baker Street. This alignment would avoid construction within the parking lot which is the subject of this comment. However, there was not adequate room to construct the line within this right-of-way. The right- of-way is now shared by two extremely old and decrepit sewer lines and construction near those lines might damage them and disrupt flow. The second alternate to this alignment is construction within Harbor Boulevard. Harbor Boulevard is an arterial highway with heavy traffic counts. The City of Costa Mesa does not advise using Harbor Boulevard as the alternate. The Sanitation District staff believes that construction in Harbor Boulevard when a reasonable alternate is available is not warranted. Construction a, in Harbor Boulevard would impact far more business than the proposed alignment and would result in higher construction costs and disrupt traffic. The recommended alignment has a sub-alternate. Instead of connecting from Deodar Avenue straight to Cinnamon Avenue utilizing the parking lot, the line could be rerouted in Nutmeg Place, Mace and Carraway Drive. This alternate would be much more disruptive on the residences on Mace since nearly the full street width would be required for the construction of the line. It would also be a more expensive alternate inasmuch as additional angle ® structures would have to be constructed and the pipe length would be more increased. Access by emergency equipment would be extremely difficult. For the above reasons, the recommended alignment was found to be the least disruptive on businesses and traffic as well least costly. Comment 37: With respect to consideration of cumulative impacts, the document is insufficient in that it is purely conclu- sionary. (See page 34) . Conclusionary statements unsupported by any identification or discussion of supporting information are meaningless. Since the writers of the report do not favor us with the data on which they rely, it is impossible to take a reasoned position with respect to their conclusion. 23 Response 37: The appropriate City planning agencies were contacted and requested to provide lists of current or proposed projects which when combined with this project would have a cumulative impact on the areas surrounding the project. There are no known current or proposed projects which would have a cumulative impact. 24 r s1 d ' I r � I W iI W APPENDIX A Written Comments Received ' i r ' I J :J :i r 25 W STATE e1 CAbECMN1A-0E110E 01 TN! 001ERN04 GEnAW MUNMGIAN. Qv m- �' OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH 1Ete TENTH STREET EACRAMEMO. CA RUN March 19, 1990 Jean Tappan Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 .s Fountain Valley, 92728 Subject: Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District #14 ,d SCH# 89010077 " Dear Ms. Tappan; - The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named environmental document to selected state agencies for review. The review period is closed and none of .. tha state agencies have comments. This letter acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental documents, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Pleas call Garrott Ashley at (916) 445-0613 if you have any questions regarding the environmental review process. When contacting the Clearinghouse in this matter, please use the eight-digit State Clearinghouse number so that we my respond promptly. Sincerely, - David C. Nunenkamp Deputy Director, Permit Assistance r ' S1AlE6 QI/OOaA-OIRY�'MID'1Gl�Q�A NONE,� an; ,WERE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION � r ax' . 6_WS7RICT 12• •.p� a". r� i „w y.- 2501 PULLMAN STREET . SANTA ANA. CA 92705 February 14, 1990 ' Ms. Jean Tappan - OC Sanitation District w 10044 Ellis Avenue .Fountaih Valley , CA 172728 Filer IGR/CEOA ♦T DEIR formation of r L" - Sanitation Dist 14 .i BCH# 89010077 r ' Dear Ms. Tappan: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this DEIR for the formation of a new sanitation system and plan. Caltrans District 12 has no comment other than the project will require an .. Encroachment Permit be issued should any part of the project cross over or under a State facility. From the project description and -- figures shcwir.q alignment, your project will cross State ROW at SR- .e 73, SR-55 and I-405. Please correct the text in paragraph four on page 57 as an Encroachment Permit is required to cross under the Newport and Corona Del Mar Freeways. If you have any questions or need to contact us, please call .me at (714) 724-2235. s S' re, m ob F. wept Z•4s .: - Advance Planning Branch ". " . cc: BGSI Bengtson, Permits - _. George Smith, HOTRS Planning Garrett Ashley, OPR .a 'OHN WAYNE AIRPORT TEL No :714-755((-6569 rl Mar 14 ,90 13 :56 No .001 P .02 .. County of Orange WJ��1.1U ra March 9, 1990 m TO: Tan Mittermeier FROM: Christina Edwards SUIM=: Draft Supplement No. 1 to Final EIR - Baker-Gisler Intercepter and Baker Force Maus a I have the following comments to the draft ETR: 1. Page 11 - North Clear Zone Parking lot encroachment during construction should not be a problem if it is adequately c--z=U ated with us. 2. Page 26 - Construction activities along Airway Avenue have the potential for limiting access to Airport businesses including Millionaire, Martin's westside hangar tenants as well as tiedown tenants using the Baker -, entrance and Airport and Fire Department vehicles using the Paularino entrmmoe. The draft supplement indicates that access to these areas will be maintained at all times and that construction will be coordinated with us and our affected tenants. Past eyperience indicates that careful coordination and continual monitoring dosing construction will be necessary to ensure that adequate access is maintained. The construction related coordination should be acrrsrplished with Airport operations. I should be the initial contact person. 3. Page 63 - The EIR indicates that one lane will be maintained for each direction of traffic on Airway Avenue. Since Paularino (wdddi crosses Airway Avenue) is a primary access route for emergency vehicles, - sufficient space absolutely must be raijt i„e„ at all timers for them to cross the intersection of Paularino and Airway Avenue. Additionally, I ma unclear as to the timing of this construction. If it is to begin prior to completion of terminal or hydrant fuel, farm constructic n, airport construction access via Airport Inop Road could be adversely affected. cc: David De Icon R f: G 1.. f v r is John Nowlixd, Fire Dept. MAR 1'1 1990 Mike Nut d Bill Pemberton dY0.CAM=NTY Shirli Allen Fan rohrey, Sheriff's Dept. CE:fh 151M4 0.4N WHYNE HIKYUKI 14L NO . I14-I N-oJotl mar a .eu ♦V•c, rvu .uvJ r .va f County of Orange February 27, 1990 TO: David De Leon, JWA/RED FROM: Chris Caliendo, JWA/Project Managementc(�2 SUBJECT: Draft Supplement No. 1 to final EIR Baker—Gisler Interceptor and Baker Force Main I have reviewed the supplement and would like to see the following comments incorporated into the final EIR. 1 . The Land Use Section 5.5.3 states 'access to private properties will be maintained during the construction phase of the project". John Wayne Airport is not private property. JWA needs to have its access assured. 2. The Transportation and Circulation Section 5.6.3 fails to mention access to JWA via the Airport Loop Road gate. 3. The Health and Safety Section 5.9.3 needs to be amended t0 include provisions for Airport security while working on Airport property. This section should also address FAA construction regulations. A Form 7460 will need to be filed with the FAA, listing all construction equipment (i .e. , cranes, etc.) that will be used on Airport property. the FAA will then issue a Notice to Proceed, listing mitigation measures and operational procedures. CBC:jm 0687m OF (i Commun-N Development Department - v m C:n• of lrv:ne. One C.v:c Center Plaza. PO Box 19575. Irmne. Caldornla 927713 I7:11 7246000 March 12 , 1990 Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 SUBJECT: DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH# -' 89010077) FOR FORMATION AND REORGANIZATION OF DISTRICTS 14 , 79, 7 AND 13 Dear Mr. Dawes: Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for the formation and reorganization of County Sanitation Districts 14, 79, 7 and 13 . The SEIR was reviewed by the Environmental Services Section for inclusion of our comments we made on November 11, 1989, regarding the Notice of Preparation (NOP) . Staff comments have been set forth below as general comments and specific comments. GENERAL COMMENTS Previously on the NOP, the City of Irvine commented that the project description should include pertinent information on what additional capacity the 90 inch sewer line will provide over and above the existing 72 inch sewer line, and what additional studies are needed to comply with CEQA. Please explain and identify in the Final EIR what additional increase in capacity 18 inches in diameter will provide, and what studies will be needed for CEQA compliance. Please explain in the Final EIR why items checked off in the NOP Initial Study as "No" were considered not to have an impact. SPECIFIC COMMENTS Earth Resources Please identify any disruptions to the outer walls of the Santa Ana River channel for the sewer line connection to Fountain Valley. Mr. Thomas M. Dawes March 12 , 1990 Page Two Water Resources Please explain in the Final EIR what significant impacts may result from the increased sewer line capacity of 72" to 901, on the ocean, given treated waste will be discharged into it. Noise Please explain in the Final EIR what increase in noise, above the ambient noise level, will occur due to project construction. Transportation/ Explain how many and from where parking Circulation spaces will be removed. Since the City of Irvine prohibits on-street parking on major arterials, how will this project relocate parking spaces? Please include in the Final EIR the following mitigation measure: in conjunction with the submittal of applications for preliminary grading permits, the County of orange Sanitation Districts shall submit a construction detour plan for any planned detours within Irvine City limits. The plan e, shall be reviewed and approved by the City's Director of Public Works. The Final EIR needs to explain how the County shall coordinate with John Wayne Airport and owners of affected buildings to minimize disruption to existing operations during project construction. Again, thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this document. Staff requests that a copy of the Response to Comments and Final EIR be forwarded to Jennifer Regan, Assistant Planner, when it becomes available. Sin e d A. STACEHOUSE, AICP Manager of Development Services cc: Sheri Vander Dussen, Principal Planner Jennifer Regan, Assistant Planner jr/ialdawes w M N"aw DIStft February 26, 1990 _ e000 w OMMMi Orange County Sanitation District x[xxr a.roxuur 10844 Ellis Ave. - °""'" Fountain Valley, CA 92708 xaxio ouaaxm - 5ti.dx� ATTN: Ms. Jean Tappan Subject: Draft Supplement No. 1 to the Final .- ixoxasE.xeuox.o.o. Environmental Impact Reoort Proposed ,enrganizatSor No. 79 Formation nf. county _ mwroxua Sanitation District No. 14 and Reorganization of Districts No. 7 and 13 --- Baker-Gisler -- Interceptor and Baker Force Mains. _ Dear Ms . Tappan: wuxemr The Mesa Consolidated water District has no comments regarding the subject supplement. Please keep us informed regarding the construction schedule. IYR 0•RFT M.W.IIML00F ��en.Yx[s BMnE 1RMF80x uo,s ouox Very Truly Yours, .. �in arlso� Associate Civil Engineer s JC/pr _ r ,r P.O.Box 5008. 1966 Placentia Avenue• Coma Mesa,Calilomia 92628-5008 Telephone (714) 631-1200 FAX (714)631.3614 r DRUMMY GARRETT KING S. NARRISON A mo,C 0. COwwo.. ATTORNEYS AT uw aaoo wYwM LLNT.. Ow rvc.T LLITN "..A A... COOL )I. .a.+.N"'"iN".' TuewNONe em-IBoo COSTA MESAS CALIFORNIA 02B86 .'..Cl YLL NUR TO:w O. BOR SOBO TLLLCO wILR OMI ....... epauL UTex N.w�s OLnw COSTA MESA, CALIIORNIA 02626 6431.002 N. .""o�LUNL AL March 20, 1990 wvcw To uxu)Mme u.B+uo-w.M�OM ouOM06.wOxL ..ML IO/n _ NPx ox M[ .. YxN Ow.an.c sNNL .wwRnx VIA MESSENGER COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Re: Draft Supplement No. 1 to the Final Environmental Impact Report - Proposed Reorganization No. 79; Formation of county Sanitation District No. 14; and Reorganization of Districts No. 7 and 13 Regarding Baker - Gisler Interceptor and Baker Force Mains Dear Sir: Thank you for the opportunity to review the above referenced draft EIR Supplement. The following comments are submitted on behalf of the Mesa Verde Country Club. These comments are presented by reference to the sections of the draft EIR Supplement to which they pertain. Biota (Pages 44-45) . ,r The draft EIR Supplement states that only "approxi- mately 12 trees and/or large shrubs" will be impacted by the proposed project. The District, however, has previously acknow- ledged that at least 30 mature trees will be impacted and that the majority of these affected trees probably cannot be success- fully_ transplanted. Given the importance of these mature trees to 'the golf course, the Club believes the loss of these trees constitutes a significant impact. At a minimum, mitigation should include replacement of the lost trees with comparable mature specimens and adequate provisions guaranteeing survival of the replacement trees. Noise (Pages 46-50) . Construction noise will inevitably disrupt and signi- ficantly affect golf course operations, and the proposed mitiga- DRUMMY GARRETT KING 6 HARRISON A M0R$51" Eo"aoRn"w ♦TTORNEYS AT LAW County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California March 20, 1990 Page 2 tion measures are inadequate to avoid this significant effect. As additional mitigation, construction should be scheduled at this site during the season of minimal course use and the cessa- tion of all construction activities during any major event at the Club should be required. Land Use (Pages 51 - 54) . The draft EIR Supplement states that the project "will be compatible with other existing uses in the area since the pipelines will be beneath the ground's surface. " This statement is incorrect. The project, as proposed through the Mesa Verde Country Club, involves the construction of an approximately 6 " foot high by 8 foot wide aboveground box sewer, a large above- ground structure, and a pipeline access ramp. [The draft EIR fails to even describe the use of this large aboveground structure. ] The construction of these obtrusive facilities will _ constitute a continuing impact on the club 's golf course operations. Moreover, the construction of these facilities will ,^ effectively terminate the Club's abutter's right of access to Gisler Avenue over most of its length. Termination of these access rights will preclude alternative uses, which would otherwise be feasible, of the area of the Club adjacent to these facilities. The draft EIR Supplement also states that there are "no ingress/egress routes for residences or businesses which _ will be blocked due to construction. " This statement is also inaccurate. Construction through the Mesa Verde Country Club will block the existing access of the Club to Gisler Avenue during construction. The draft EIR Supplement also describes the easement ee required from the Club as measuring approximately 20 feet wide by 1,000 feet in length. In fact, the easement demanded by the District is approximately 25 wide by 1000 feet in length. An r additional temporary construction easement has been demanded that is also approximately 25 feet wide by 1,000 feet in length. Transportation and Circulation (Pages 55 - 64 ) - As noted in the preceding section on Land Use, the proposed project would effectively terminate the Club's abutter 's rights of access to Gisler Avenue along most of its _. length thereby foreclosing the potential for residential development in the area of the Club adjacent to the proposed "+ project. This should be considered an unmitigated impact. DRUMMY GARRETT KING 6 HARRISON a P MCI SIONAL CORGOMTON ATTORNEYS AT LAW County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California March 20 , 1990 Page 3 In addition, the denial of use of the existing access .,, road during construction will significantly impact golf club operations and mitigation should be provided. Recreation (Page 65 ) . The draft EIR Supplement describes the easement required from Mesa Verde Country Club during construction as "25 v feet wide by 1,000 feet in length" and states that the "permanent easement area will be 20 feet wide by 1, 000 feet in length" . As previously noted, these statements are incorrect. The permanent easement demanded by the District is actually approximately 25 feet wide by 1,000 feet in length and an additional temporary construction easement has been demanded that is 25 feet wide by 1,000 feet in length. The conclusion that no significant impacts will occur is also unwarranted. During the construction period, impacts '^ would certainly be significant unless construction is scheduled to avoid peak seasonal usage of the Club and unless cessation of construction is required during any major event. Moreover, the G removal of mature landscaping, coupled with the conspicuous aboveground design of the facilities and the apparent necessity for on-going maintenance through the unidentified large accessory structure, all suggest that the long-term impact to the golf course must be considered significant. Health and Safety (Pages 72 - 76 ) . .. Although the draft EIR Supplement acknowledges that the project may entail nuisances including "noise, dust, leaks, <, odor, filth, overflows of untreated waste water, and/or traffic congestion", it nevertheless concludes that no significant im- pacts will occur. The analysis in this section with respect to both short-term construction impacts and long-term impacts is plainly inadequate. In particular, this section .fails to mean- ingfully discuss the long-term potential for leaks, odor, spills and overflows of untreated waste water. Since a malfunction at the District 's Fountain Valley Plant recently resulted in a 250, 000 gallon sewage spill through backed-up sewers in this area, the risk of such major nuisances is apparent and should be fully addressed. Aesthetics (Page 77 - 78) . The Club believes that the aesthetic impact of this project on Club property should be considered significant. In DRUMMY GARRETT KING 6 HARRISON a � Cowvo, " ay ATTOR..YS AT LAW County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California March 20, 1990 Page 4 r addition to the short-term impacts during construction, the long-term aesthetic impact of this obtrusive design is apparent. Construction of the proposed aboveground 90 inch sewer line together with the associated aboveground structure and the loss of 30 mature trees will necessarily entail significant visual impacts unless fully and carefully mitigated. Mitigation, at a minimum, should include replacement of the lost trees, visual screening of the associated structure with mature landscaping, and installation of adequate landscape screens between Gisler Avenue and the golf course. Replacement landscaping should r utilize mature specimens and the District should provide assurances of its viability for a reasonable period. r Alternatives to Proposed Action (Pages 81-83) . The alternatives discussion in the draft EIR Supple- ment is legally inadequate in that it fails to discuss a reason- able range of alternatives to the project or to the location of _ the project. In particular, the EIR fails to consider reloca- tion of the project to avoid the impacts to the Mesa Verde .. Country Club and also fails to consider any alternatives to the proposed project design (e.g. , the construction of an under- ground sewer through the Mesa Verde Country Club) which could avoid significant impacts on the Club. For all the foregoing reasons , the Mesa Verde Country Club believes that the draft EIR Supplement is both inaccurate and legally inadequate. The Club urges the District to reconsider the location and design of the proposed facilities to avoid the significant impacts on the Club of the project as presently proposed. Your consideration of these comments is appreciated. Please provide this office with notice of any further proceedings concerning this matter and a copy of the final EIR Supplement as soon as it is available. Very truly yoouurss,��n��/, r OL Robert L. Rlotz for DRUMMY GARRETT RING RARRISON w RLK:jc cc: Mesa Verde Country Club w L A W OFFICCS r Ax[s r. BLACK STOCK SULLIVAN, WORKMAN 6 DEE LIxO ADowos C NYPLES i. CFLLANAN •.Y.rv[Po rvIn IwCWWrvP.IIOT[SSwx.�[MxDNTD.6 PoST piI1CL BOX OBOE CNABLCE O. CYNNiN05 Lp5 ANOLLCX 4 BOOITgBOB JONx J. DCC TWELFTH FLOOR J^VVN 8. OSIDA BOO SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET TOLECO PI[R QOI BEi-i1EB G EPST.I. w DART A, xiVAnC LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 9OOt7-2521 JONN [. xAcwu m CP NCET 6. SAxdLZ TELCPNONC 12131 62<-53M PL[ASC RLi[P TO A PTNVP A. 9 l II OYB rLLC NO. POOCP R. SVILIL4VA wOPXRA. -A sw[[ue..l CO.ro..nery March 14, 1990 County Sanitation District of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 ti Attention: Jean Tappan Contact Person Re: Draft Supplement to Environmental Impact Report for Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14, etc. SCH No. 89012077 .d Gentlemen: This letter is written in response to your notice of February 2, 1990 inviting public comment on the subject Draft Supplement No. 1. The public comment period is open until March 20, 1990. This letter is submitted on behalf of Magna Enterprises, Inc. , 1520 Nutmeg Place, Costa Mesa, California. On November 17, 1989 we wrote you listing five areas which RR we believed should be addressed in the proposed Draft Supplement. Those areas were: 1. Risks and hazards of accidents resulting from the operation of the proposed facilities. 2. Creation of health hazards because of leaks or any other aspect of operation of the facilities. 3 . Disruption of businesses during construction -1 activities because of change in traffic 'circulation, digging up of streets, loss of parking, erection of barricades, etc. Y 4. Consideration of feasible alternatives to the proposed route and project. 5. Consideration of cumulative impacts of the proposed project and other projects known or anticipated in the area. RR County Sanitation District March 14 , 1990 Page Three ® on businesses and have not attempted to discuss or assess the effect of that impact. 4 . With respect to consideration of feasible alternatives to the proposed project, the authors of the Draft Supplement have given no consideration at all to the logical alternative of using the public right of way in Harbor Boulevard for the project. This alternative would eliminate the use of eminent domain. Moreover, there is no discussion whatever of alternative project routes except a "no project" alternative (Alternative 1) and a Mace-Carraway-Cinnamon alternative (Alternative 2 in the document) . It simply does not make sense that there are no feasible alternative routing other than the above. Your report is legally required to discuss reasonably feasible possibilities, not just selected possibilities that the agency prefers to discuss. Further , the discussions in the report of Alternative 1 and Alternative 2 are not reasoned discussions supported by data and facts set forth in the report. Such discussion as exists is conclusionary in nature and based on undocumented or inadequately explained assumptions. such presentation and reasoning fails to meet the requirements of California law. S. With respect to consideration of cumulative impacts, the document is insufficient in that it is purely conclusionary. (See page 34) . Conclusionary statements unsupported by any identification or discussion of supporting information are meaningless. Since the writers of the report do not favor us with the data on which they rely, it is impossible to take a reasoned position with respect to their conclusion. For the above reasons it must be concluded that Supplemental Draft No. 1 is seriously flawed and should be rejected. Should the matter be considered by you further on a future occasion, we would welcome the opportunity to be heard further. Since Mr . Roger M. Sullivan, who wrote you on November 17 , 1989 , is unavailable at this moment for signature of this letter , I- am signing this letter in his absence. Very truly yours, Ernest E. Sanchez SULLIVAN, WORKMAN & DEE EES:rm 1092f/1 Enclosure cc: Mr. Joseph A. Magna Roger M. Sullivan, Esq. t� RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS WEDNESDAY, JULY 11, 1990 - 7 :30 P .M. >.J FUN 9199 - JT GIST MORNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/30190 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 D .n ux rr Re NL.IATI i tT...IS ns noeu cr rnua rT N YLAIMS PAID 06/06/90 POSTING DATE 06/06190 or L . ARRANT On+ vrannR eu nyur or¢re.IP7101L_ _____ 107234 A.M. BEST COMPANY $90.31 PUBLICATION In7pinLi a T s ESEAVirR 107236 ADAMSON UNIFRRM 0 CO7YP•' �1iR46.69 LAN SUPPLIER • 10T237 pp9A NCO CONSTRUCT ORSp IN6 AB'7BI 21.86 CONSTRUCTION PI-94-2 'R22jA AIR. oRM1n,i'i A 1.ENTrAI INC. ' 4.> Nil"A nrgGpY ..H 'v vv n4�AGRRp11gyZM.p.R_y�¢_ 107239 ALPHAGA2 $437.63 SPECIALTY CASES ' 107290 AMER ICAN AIR FILTER. INC. $1,333.14 MECHANICAL PARTS IS7242 "OECD INC..-E/b. AMER ICAN SEALS i54540.62 CASKETS/PITTINCS 107PA3 AMERICAN TEOMHIC AL SUPPLY 61`B94.2E FILM fLIYA6 6N....R YIR1"L fARli RM n_Rn TRI RV HEBY¢TRN ➢IxT¢ 'n 107245 ANTHONY•S MECH. B MACHINE, INC S1.533.31 PUMP PARTS z 107246 A-PLUS SYSTEMS 17.760.B1 NOTICES b ADS C1 LIQ.91 =n¢n¢¢ 9FR yifx4 n " 107245 ARATER SEROICESI INC4' 6146.06 UNIFORMS ° 107249 ARENE INDUNTRIES INC. AIB ES INSTRUMENT PARTS 294A R. e T aYnnANL IcA Aln9_IA MIC.ARTTA.. 6ART4 107251 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $61,493.44 GRIT REMOVAL N.0.7-13-00 107252 BRY SAFETY EiT 6 SUPPLY $1,646.88 SAT SUPPLIES N ° 187254 P.N BAAOT71 AND ASSOC. AN1562.50 CONSTRUCTION BER9ICES PI-34-2.P2-37 C7 , 107255 AA1ER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS 41i7B8.61 LAB SUPPLIES 171%. ' tlr Ian N Ft he., INC. btR.4i mimARrnli. PaT¢ 107257 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS S634.11 OFFICE SUPPLIES D 10725E BON-A-RUES 1185.63 TRUCK PARTS r1IR7259 ONES PRINTING 9Ao9R. r " 107260 RpFgNER-A`IEDLER I ASSOC,, INC. 11�0.7] - - I":,E BNT SUPPLIES p 107Y 61 BR IN DER 80N CORP. A1p45416g8.70`. CONSTRUCTION 3-19-2 R2252 Ronu t r2. nurl •1A76601...BAN tin RSRSICRR x 10IEEE OR A CALDWELL CONSULTING 137.238.98 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19 107269 STEYE RUBALO CONSTRUCTION CO. 11.455.843.00 CONSTRUCTION I4-1-IB s VnRT.m ATTnn ('7 " 107266 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE $099.76 pus LICATION 107267 4ANY 0. SIREED A296.51 PETTY CASH REINBURSENENT ' (n 00 1BI2- V ALYB¢ ° 107269 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH, INC. $2,699.82 LAB SUPPLIES I a 7270 CAL-PAC CHEMICAL CO.. INC. $186.90 CHEMICALS nIR.Ama PARTS x 107272 CAL FORNIA AUTO COLLISION. TNC SIo5.29 TRW&PARTS 107273 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC SITE $85.00 GATE TIMER .I_Qm4 CA .IPORMIA FIITRL Intl f1..05fl.26__ MRCHAKlCALSlPF'lR8_._ _ ° 107275 CAPITAL ME37YARD $222.69 MECHANICAL PARTS 107276 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $316.375.90 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-I5.I-9.P1-20 JUM77 CARr POUFR A r.114PNFNI S39.Aa TO'R ...Ta 107270 CENTEL COMMUNICATIONS SY37EM $154.77 'MRPEDHE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 107270 CENTURY SAFETY INST: 8 SUPP. S1.067.28 SAFEIT SUPPLIES I n FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/33/94 PAGE 2 D REPORT NUMBER AP43 1 `"N.LLAI.I.ON�iS.TR ICT"f-0RANGLCG=T• - N CLAIMS PAID 86/06/90 POSTING DATE 06/06/90 p e.xT un. uEND1N` 'NOUN, --OESCkluj.ON —._ --- r ' 107280 CHEMICAL AOSTRACiS SERVICE SI70.00 SUBSCRIPTION STR N P I07202 Q6 'E CNRiSi1AN STAUC. ENGR: 33.348.50 DRUIIN0u8ERVICES J-7-4 ' 101207 Cr2e NE CRAMNSHAFTf INC. $1.280.00 MECHANICAL PARTS .nTiU r r6w{1if .AY.. jj M..DD EWCINMANC�P8VIC6S.J=lw 107205 COAST INSURANCE AGENCY 5327.150.00 PROPERTY INSURANCE H.0.5-9-90 ' 107286 COLICM AND SONG $240,792.30 CONSTRUCTION 2-11-3 w 5EAr1n IA. l(SHI , ' 101288 CONPUSERVE $12.60 COMPUTER SERVICES n 167289 CONNRO}G, PHOTOGRAPHY 4212.50 PGGTOCRAPRT 1 eTeon Jiu[f rnun ADS. lA NEFTI" vvovNRP m ° 107291 CONNELL G.M. PARTS / DIV. $63.14 TRUCK PARTS Z ' 107292 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. S7.943.98 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES t7 UGF.TI n " 107299 CONTROL DATA ID" f171.3T INSTRUMENT PART - 10729E CONY ERS( CONSULTANTS 11ESt 512i235.25. CONSULTING SERVICES P2-42 1 ' cx9es_h.D.i1v97A-A-ea-Jd9 m 107297 R. E. COULTER CRANE RENTAL $1,063.09 CRANE RENTAL 3 107298 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $171.98 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES O , 10730b CN[NPED ENY Iq QNMENTAL $E1lQ 10E3 ' ' I�- i3.133.94 JANITORIAL SUPPLIER 107301 QAE 1N¢TRIIMENTS 61i.6.06 ELECTRIC PARTS ER nrl rA e66AN oiinnNtTe .l _n2 TU [rvm 119 w 107303 DEZURIN AND/OR IS CD. $27.13 VALVE PARTS ➢ - 107304 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES S2.296.14 PRINTING r 9 r 107306 06p 000141TT 11P �SF3} INCH -. fl}}323,69 PLANT MAINTERUCB 6 REPAIRS =1 10730T OQNN E4 Eqq 08'' NACN MOVING t450.B0 - SPACE RENT J-19 7}eR nuNY AvNIAn en0o_ AA{A,Oo 61TUT RD"Ai TRn (A 107309 O•VA'S SALES f279.51 FITTINGS z ` 107510 EASTMAN♦ INC. f1.688.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES A 7311 _ eTm rTTnw o_oA_f 1_77 n imi2 ECQANALYSIE' INC. f1.bs0.23 OCEAN RESEARCB N 107311 EN CHANTERI 60. fTfOUgiQO OCeAN MONITORING.PLO.3-14-90 ' Eisl& I ArHa.lry R4 fP(:A1. RRPVTP.RR _ BTPnnn 107315 FACILITIES SUPPORT CO. $604.20 TOOLS ' 107316 JOHN B. FALKENSTEIN P.E. $3,750.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-4,J-20 TKO ' 101316 FEDERAL ERPRESS CORP. $144.60 AIR FREIGHT 107319 FIIIANCIAL MODELING SPECIALISTS A200.00 SOMME 101 20 IECNEA L "OTER ED: _91•191.47 CULORIBAT IBM PARTS _ 307521 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. S194.54 LU SUPPLIES ° 107522 FLAT 0 VERTICAL CONCRETE $130.25 CONCRETE CUTTING MRNT PARTA 107324 .FLUID HANDLING SYSTEMS 400.98 - PUMP PUTS 107325 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $19.23 FILM ' D � h ' ' FUND/ 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING 007E 5/30/911 PAGE 3 ` REPORT NUMBER AP43 n ^^""E 8AN33AS10N-O.1STA�L-LS-0F�RANGC_[WNS.T W CLAIMS PRI0 06/06/90 POSTING DATE 06/06/90 n. ubbnnp Awn"ur DESCR 1-110N C ' 107326 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $8,512.92 WATER USEAGR NSIROMEHi-SUHPITBS ' 107326 FRANKt N ELECTRONIC COMPUTER 1294.19 OFFICE SUPPLIES ° 107329 FRE,MAP.TRU¢K PARTS f903 - TRUCK PARTS 1 umBER/NARDWARB • 107331 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS $8.232.50 FIBERGLASS FABRICATION ' 307332 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1.745.88 TELEPHONE SERVICES eCTBIC-BURP}les 1073SA GIERLCH- I ITQ L l 0. SI8.050.93 - MBCHANCIAL PARTS 2 ' ' S00 HEART MIL[bA COi fT7.75 BUILDING.SUPPLIES N O ECW • As bC3A da TB 665.D0 SO RVSUN0-SORN1CBeJtB8B0O• m 107337 HER DIESEL MACHINE $587.56 TRUCK PARTS 107338 HACH COMPANY f720.56 LAB SUPPLIES C 8R-T6BJI711AL-RBPAIPr.-T 3- 1° is7340 MATCH'S MIRK# INC. t106230:55 MECHANICAL PARTS 107341 S; A• rCALY CO. 3123.462.29 CONSTRUCTION it-35-1 P • rued' uFlm T•1A7 ^0 tlPEtINO mun.AR — M 1 107343 HILTI. INC. f425.55 FITTINGS 3 107344 HDERBIGER C.V.S. CALIF. • INC. f173.31 COMPUTER PARTS CHAHIFA' ^ARTS H ° ID HOUSE ' H USE M IT ERIE3. f1�.33960j�.7t7a BpAlnTRIES O 1073j7 R AS O.i INC. li 0t6.36 YET U Pa HB 6 ` n731 biUf,&hihb 1111M UEBFR 07abo 107349 HUNTINGTON SUPPLY $90.65 DAMAGE 1> 107350 HUNTING70N VALLEY TOOL $247.39 TOOLS r r 107352 IMRERIIC' EST CHEMICAL A9¢13S +,1 FERRIC CHLOIIDB M.0.I1-08-89 ID 7353 IHBUSTR kAL 0 3)CNST INCH 30B3a05 ELECTRIC PARTS n7i9e INnuerb ei' rubP nrn n nm era t2aA,1i m(LNBmntu Cn " 107355 INFILCO OEGREMONT. INC. 9411.53 MECHANICAL PARTS 107356 INGRAM PAPER 24.284.95 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES p4 SHIRE E't 101350 [NT ER ,A j19M AL SENSOR TEEN. R1.356233 INSTRUMENT PARTS 107359 IRTERMAT iiONAL TIME PELORUEP f89.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT .__IE_736n ' —WATER.USEAnr — ° 107361 JAY-S CATERING f337.60 MEETING EXPENSE ' 107362 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $145.32 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES .InvrF nFF.tr A.06.6s nPEICESHHPL188 42 107364 KALLEWS COMPUTER SUPPLIES f2T53T.32 COMPUTER PARTS ' 107365 KAHAN BEARINGS L SUPPLY3161a2¢ FITTINGS 6A •MAbr■ rMNPbN• Akin-'A TOOLS ° 107367 THE KEITH COMPANIES f2.3B5.90 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-3565-36 ' 107368 KENKO. INC. 3185.399.10 CONSTRUCTION 5-34-2 1.71&9 NEN.r. nII ILA a.ea_nn WAST¢ nII v.1. 107370 MIEN IT PACIFIC COa f21t078.60 CONSTRUCTION P1-31 107371 KING SEARINGi INC. $4,779,73 MACHINE SUPPLIES h FUND NO 9199 - JT OIST VORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/30/90 PAGE 4 ri PEPORI NUMBER AP43 r nuNS.Y__SANLLAllLALnLSllUSJS_gF�gANLLLDNurr _ .0 CLAIMS PAID 06/06/90 POSTING DATE 06/96/90 11ARRANI An, 1tEun OR enonu* pESLa t on na r • 107312 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $3,054.93 TOOLS • TEDCTICM-S8RY766° 107374 EINEL KASHA/JINN L. KOSHA a59.99 LIABILITY CLAIM 107318 LA MOTTE CNEMICAL PRODUCTS f1I0.29 CHEMICALS 1;6.26 NEETT un RIPRN4P _ ° 107378 N.Y. LAVMRTNEfl 6 CO.. INC. 33.000.00 SOIL TESTING ' 1OT378 LEADER PARTNERSHIP f133.000.O0 MARY,CTION YEE REPUKD 5 ' 107380 LEE ir RO CONSULTING ENGR. S28tt903.00 NO BNOINEERI SERVICES PI-33 ' 107381 LEEOS E NORTHROP - l261.00 INSTRU.NJUd PART fT1 ° 107303 LE ROY CRANDALL 6 ASSOC. 9689.50 GEOTECRNICAL SERVICES Z ° 107384 LIMITOROUE CORP. $1,081.00 MECHANICAL PARTS C7 P MI PETRTI, A.I.P _ n ° 107386 k.P. LINDNTROM4 INC7 $61535i22 CONSULTING SERVICES - SIR A MASTER PUN ,.y ^ 107387 LOS AN6 EL CS COUNTY SANITATION - i2gjs{9q 0:00 POQL® MIS COUNTY ESTIMATING PROGRAM M.o.12-13-5 ^ BR A.J. NICE, en- �199_N} Id NTTORT A. RIIPPI IRN 3 " 107309 HOC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $2.041.45 OCEAN MONITORING 107390 MPS $311.70 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES CxexTOAT AUPPLTPP F- ^ 107392 'NA LC OLR P}R NIE «« INC: ' fjSff160:22 ENGINEERIMO SERVICES N.D:7-12-09 '0 307393 MRfl VAC E4EC ADMITS FI51eTB INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 33 MECHANICAL 107395 MORAHAN DESK INC. $133.88 FILING CABINETS )> - ^ 107396 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. $906.31 TOOLS r 2 TN$TaNxyNT 0.yPAlR. r ^ . IMES hETER CRAFT INC. $47.24 ELECTRIC REPAIRS Cy ^ 107399 MICROAGE CCMPURI f881.88 OFFICE EQUIPMENT R24Lo ca nR NNPT alit AN aAMtr. 4.5 Rkh' 15 COMPUTER SOMARR 107401 MIDA INDUSTRIES. INC. f71760.00 CONTRACT SERVICES J-7-4 A ^ 107402 SERPENTIX AND/ $3,568.38 MECHANICAL PARTS TAR eRVm.. t1 " 107404 MOROAD CRANE C ." INC. 1211651 TRUCE PARTS N '• 107405 NATIONAL ACADEMI OT SCIENCES 6157.91 PUBLICATION 06 NATION L INPDO A"" DATA CtR: RRRJ5 PUBLICATION- -- ° 107401 NATIONAL LUMBER $381.14 HARDWARE ' 10740E NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES. INC. $11,712.64 CONSTRUCTION 5-37-2 R19 ISTRATION ' 107910 OUST K. NEVBERG COMET. C0: $2.116,932.10 ' CONSTRUCTION P1-03 ' I07411 NEUPORT ELECTRONICS f66:39 INSTRUMENT REPAIR 2 CHARLER NICHOLS $474.72 I�HTItlC_EEPBN°a ___ • 107413 NORTH SUPPLY $281.73 COMMUNICATION PARTS ' 107414 FREO O•BRIEN $372.25 MEETING EXPENSE UI F OR R_E_S, 11.415.25 OFPTCP. nmxiIllA. ° 10T9 6 D% By CO. $091240.03 CHLORINE M.O.2-14-90 107417 ORANGE BEARING. INC. 9147.30 MECHANICAL PARTS Q F� 10 9199 JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/30/9U PAGE 5■ D REPORT NUMBER AP43 `- I OE—OR eu ar rm.0 r• v7 CLAIMS PAID 06/06/90 POSTING DATE 66/06/90 ., - "AIAT Mn VrMnrR AYn11Mr -r BfPTrON r ' 307418 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY $201.86 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES i22' -5 'NUrR PARTS • 490 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. g930:39 HYDROCHLORIC ACID ' D79E1 ORANGE VALVE 6 FIT1I4G CO. }2jO21.97 FITTINGS ' �EECIALTT-CA9�^ 107423 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $9,312.52 REIMBURSE WORKERS CONP INSURANCE ' 107424 PSOCIPOOL SUPPLY OF D.C.) $70.92 BUILDING MATERIALS PARIR se ra.r7 INSTAUMeNT_RBPA•0. 'r l0792R PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. 5905.E3 SAFETY SUPPLIES n OY4Y PALIf7C BELL AT9},eAi TELEPHONE SeRVICBi ELRPBONB-POLR-ADDITIONS-DIST 2 FTI 107429 PHOTO 6 SOUND CO. $164.15 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 2 ' 107430 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS. INC. $43.962.05 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88 C7 NsonvegS D 10743E POLYPURE6. INCi G!I}238 31 POLYMERS M.0.1-10-90.8-9-89 107433 FONTON INDUSTRIES. INC. $692:35 INSTRUMENT ELEf.'1fl1C_$1 vv�Iae _ 3 107435 POWER SYSTEMS $972.00 ENGINE REPAIR 107436 HAROLD PRIER OSE 10E $36.00 ICE # 187417 THE N CO. RTomiRuan nu rveR rr]nu u gg1aSS I--' 10743E PULE FEEDER l(},YN:73" NBCWANICAL PARTS I07S39 OAO.F. ASSOCIATES S 67gq.00 - ENGINEERING SERVICES - CONSTRUCTION INSPEC. I MOTORS my v3veiR r 10T44I RECYC' INC. $38.580.00 SLUDGE REMOVAL 1.0.5-11-88 D> - 187442 RED WING SHOES $352.63 SAFETY SHOES r I_ ORARY SERVICES _ 107444 - REHE DY TEMP . 3023.54 - TEMPORARY SeRVICBB p " ICT415 THE REPRO}IC SUPPLY CO.' F151.68 FITTINGS 10744[L IMF . COVERS N " 107447 RICHARDS, MATSON R GERSHON $3.521.46 LEGAL SERVICES 6-11-86 A ' 101448 ROBERTS CORP. S5.6111.64 CONSTRUCTION J-7-4 9 RP.PR rMN$TRDETIDM -1] 107450 J. R'. ROBERTS i201r173:65 CONSTRUCTION J-10 107451 ROBINSON FERTILIZER CO. $30043,00 CHEMICALS 92 RDNAN ENG1MErRING CD. AR3R.AR 1NSTROI/E31�11Fv.avv 107453 ROTANIUM PRODUCTS CO. $1,430.09 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 107454 RUSSELECTRIC $130.50 ELECTRIC PART 5 RYAN-HrREo 317.3A YI1Trura 107456 SAFETY•NLEEN CORP. A66.40 PARTS CLEANER 107467 SANCON ENGINEERING . INC. $2,160.40 MANHOLE COVER REPLACE n ' —UIJ58_ 36NT1 INA [LEC]R1T MOTORS 3M.31 Sucat]n NEVER 107459 SCHULER ENGINEERING CORP. 1111.792.02 CONSTRUCTION PI-27-162 707460 SCHULTZ NEC". CONTRACTORS. INC i1.736.00 MECHANICAL PARTS " 1SEA COA ' 107462 SEAL ENGINEER NG CO. $217,38 PUMP PARTS 107463 SHAMROCK SUPPLY p69.09 MECHANICAL PARTS n 1 f FUND NO S:99 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5130192 PAGE 6 z i 0, REPORT NUMBER AP43 m EC AliiS'.rI}D sIT.8.P6I9q.. Pe TBE bA}E obi6ai 6- ( ' C 107464 SKYPPRK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $1,595.50 PHYSICAL SERIES ' 1079 4t f iA' PRESENT non AIDS ' ibiA i `< I '�9WEiiEgT:to3 A5.2l2.0b sail PRESENT N.o,A,}A-bE e.� a> 43 TAW E 37Ea31 COI@UiBN ;ARTS 4 107969 SOLAR TURBINES INTERNATIONAL Ag99.16 GENERATOR REPAIR 10T970 S0. COA3T AIR QUALITY $9.001.00 APPLICATION PEES lOi " = UtHE' :c 6 $b@ fe.41 ' w ,',, - s1Get5ijj+T F;f ti r . EaaeR err Ift"Ktgig 7 .. 8 5 U E D[ . . ,� r`.r. IHT713 94 = brass,.-eoal. n' ID7475 WESTALLOY INC. $1.625.35 WELDING SUPPLIES fll I ' 107476 STAR TOOL S SUPPLY CO. $1,414.50 TOOLS WAIT O ;TfR- T"f ART . 3> $ t bba. ;"'�g'�w'�sl.t'� .,y 9 g'1 s. TRUCK PARTS ;� ,Iry�k ��'� �k , }c 1ti3 »`� 1 ` CRemCALS fTl 107981 t CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL. INC. 521.06E 03 HARDWARE 3 ( 101a82 TCN ASSOCIATES AS 2.90 LAB SUPPLIES Lam. 1974B1 .'- 0 6 b B 3; z =� ` > r fBDg: q `< mxeETEa sbP}}1 ' E(. t61 E _. : �, >re' r. ,�- r8e0. 9 s- 4., 1i txl4db: ER $De§ .03-1440 1 - 117987 J.G. TUCKER A SON, INC. S637.36 INSTRUMENT PARTS n Sf 107488 TWINING LABORATORIES OF S909.00 ROIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89 r 1079gb? .0 ON $1E, Cat; f"�`v1'', #if6.{} I Sfcse 10 9 , 'U }TE flC C5E y_t PASGSLSERVICES Cn.. IO T99S UPJONN SCIENTIFIC SERVICES $136.00 CPR SMILING 107999 VYR SCI ENiIFIC f9.293.70 LAB SUPPLIES Vilru C-T 107146 VALLEt CI TIE$'dUPPL CO: _ {$RB9218$ 1. PIITIVGd N ( }07A 9T VALE . SET@Ptt �E¢ A92 lb TRUCK PARTS 1 E.V 107499 VEHICLE SPRING SERVICE 9319.06 SPRING REPAIR ' 1D1511 "KING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $1,721.80 SAFETY SUPPLIES A"PT ' 107502 ' OARL Y"IEN - EO}}' A80G.S9- ' INSORANcA dubus IDN1.ltsr' mE 1O75E! - VATEh P01LVT$. N CO T00 L. $10t•50 PUBLICATION .vunvvgu.P n v= 107505 WESTERN PACIFIC EQUIPMENT CO. $458.79 TRUCK PARTS 107506 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY A51.690.35 CAUSTIC SODA N.0.8-9-89 IlIft OR I014�B VOROPEt�FEfT CO P: .160.13 COl@UB88 BOFTWI$R 107509- XCROR kORP: $1.208.89 - COPIER LPASEII CEt ' F _ , c I _ FUN 9199 - JT DIST YOBNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/30/90 PAGE 7 Z ; f REPORT NUMBER AM 3> Ddl-015JRiCiT—YE-nRANGE--CON 1 ' CLAInS PAID 06/06/90 Pb$TiNO DATE 06/66j4NTl 0 b+' z . +1--ND.-- ucew�^ 1Rwrvt ntsbREattnM " 107510 ZTEBARTN AND ALPER S715,117.40 CONSTRUMON PI-34-1 � . TOTAL b}eL �'{'t0 06/06/90.- $10,8110302.57 SMARY ANOIINY 30.48 'I UFM FUND m /2 OPMR PND O 3,769.59 zT. /2 CAP PAC PDND 214,147.26 WIDE 'UK. 0 n Si cAe TAo Pond `j r ry4 140,000 3 OFRR FUND, „` T a I, . .rc, <u T,407 7 ."'�'•. ." 3 I13 /7 CAP POND 9,298.89 25 /7 CAP PAC FUND 569,296.2! S[ Do an4n I '7f� y°R CT > e 'rr f a i ber 2A0zid - A ;' c CZ) f14 CAP eec Co ir«•�:- R? 1,695.R3 1 1 ' 44.Thr8 9.89 /Si6 CAP PAC PUHO 12.662.64 D /667 CPU FUND 1,977 49 x J'T 1 c0¢r UND 9pu FUND p� 7 o N JT WORMING CAPITAL e119D 116,375.26 ZJ I V j A I , FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/13/90 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 . COcL hA1 qNt1ss Al-lDN-07 StR-1CtG-0E-0RANB�4E-0OYN[• F, r d bblxoA9§ hostiNa 4ATC b$lpE/90 ' .� 107535 A A G INDUSTRIES 01 684.06 TOOL BOX NODIVICATION 450 GQ ASPHALT STRIPING •t075§t AIIJ PRODU CfA 6 NERIC IL 14C In 296.00 OXYGEN GOB $@NfEW O1N AGREBRI&I H 0 8 9 09 I" idj E ' , i 4 A€ASINd ggsdclA 97Au:stATE §1 T31.EO AM L&i6E9 �t ED su§ dd �2BB:43 c®aat'.As±eR=-ear*A 107540 ALLYASTE SERVICES 92,430.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICE T. 107541 ALTA SALES, INC. S101.79 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES . qTs �t (B§pd HcAbo a 1356,4 14 TRIM FARTS , , tirF Ps s2Aie 6 CASRa7s Ae m 107546 ANACOMP 6177.T2�. OFFICE SUPPLIES Z 1b07547 AN IX TER - WIRE 6 CABLE $1g85.7B "' COMMUNICATIONS CABLE 3- / '� 81 raw `t'' ��i E ' .fA I TR � ., �} . �'£ �INNG§6Y fkc ' ' - ?rs z- - '1 .. ..r = T N 107552 AR110NA INSTRUMENTS CORP. - $63.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 3 107553 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERINb $655.00 OIL TESTING M.0.6-I4-89 it < �, / •� , sus . . . arXSQ9. a MEETI s FBS -..0.. - g, WEBB 9" ,s§ Ail 015 r wuCD 1 4 B y,,t+a"s't y1t }10755E JBANK OF AMERICA-C.A.S,C. $14.51 SOND 6 COUPON COLLECTION 107559 PIN.. BABBITT AND ASSOC. §40112.50 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PI-34-2,P2-37 N a fo9d`b-i9 . � ' AYLtR S§A.'cs fN iiY Y i ; kdC f �?r' � , Be >l7 WENT bgi3 ,.�x? t1 ee[iNBBR§xBYxrei d= 6�' �xYt .v. �107564 BENZ ENGINEERING. INC. $16015.56 MECHAJNICAL PARTS —1 IO1S65 BLACK BOX CORP $803.01 .COMPUTER HMDWARE d95s� y � "; BOLSA pkGlAtoR §Egvtt x�`><... � . ;3 } i9:B8 �� '^' RAuxAma RseAi$ i x c ...1 0750§ 3 ;BON-A-OUEO r i i x 61 6y4§ WO PARxa en69e - N a r1.. 19.�r.„ c . 3,. �6=ui ` ' ` c- a4ctaesua 107570 BUILDING NE YS• INC. 3253 AO PUBLICATION 107571 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES• INC. 8870.00 SURVEYING SERVICES US 88-71 11 7R7P GART R. ¢TREED ..3 a"}l31.51 T PETTY CASH-AKIN) MAMEiT 10t57a {P} cdnP. W sUNNt{ $d Lf loss ieSii;A OP71C8 SLAB.SUPPLIES •4 1 c lure ai agl2�i( .u3n�nraum 107576 CALIF. ASSOC. OF SANITATION $440.00 MEETING EXPENSE 11.0.6-14-99 117577 CAPITAL NEXT Y ARa $2.700.29 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES td1579Nd'a, }': }tlttt13:d0 RE FUND C6NNECttbN'TBO '` $G j ;. 1 n ibited - EH L�chat. 4EFN[N§ 0. SPLY i1i2,33 :'CHARIUA6 bae ili " -., p � ^' r , � I � r F 10 9199 - JT GIST MORNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/13/90 PAGE 2 'j REPORT NUMBER AP43 1 eL dR PAID b6/2G/9p P9STlND UA E"090" 90 PJ I r ° ARRANT NO, 'V[NDOR AFdONT hrsr6fo T#nN 3 ." 107581 YARDLEY INSTRUMENTS $223.16 INSTRUMENT PARTS ' b73ppa CHURCH EERING9 INC• Aif2 T.DO SNGIRE$RfNO 89R(1ICd$�>f 19 "t,!A (, . ioTddA- ' CLASH Vowi`DPTAHPB AaTD.gb �` Exclli&uGleO">fRR9IdREr32a gill . , + • 1175B6 CLEMENT COMMUNICATIONS. INC. S51.73 SAFETY SUPPLIES 107587 CLOY 6 CLOY. INC. $4.313.00 - REFUND CONNECTION FEE 12 6A MECHANICAL.PARTS 3975 9i RPREGRaR COMPONENTS OF CALM 42.096.26 MECHANICAL PARTS NELL G}Ma. v RT" .! b9t _ 2kVC[.PARTS a T 107592 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO 51.910.9A CHLORINE M.0.10-11-87M Z 11 107593 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS S785.84 BLUEPRINTING M.0.1-10-90 v L 101594 ErSTRACTOR-S n1 9759 ,. `, uMfiRQL pATF' DRpi A/0R =w �` �. lllfi rIP '. a".- INETPuNEET OPIUM s +�r1ONLY h 107u$C,� y ` beTA p53A Gf0 6UPP�y y' .ci. A. 3 (. 117598 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC S1.655.60 _ ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 107599 CAL WATER G201.00 RENTAL E9UIPMENT rMti..• b76D , e . 'ik PAN$ �. "',.: sPoll b: # «' 2a bD"`� d'�= PUeLIOATichl o t 1076D -uu� '# E aF C�`�otiN �` 7 " fir �e :' s ' '' t 'F eEd 's� 1 2Te :t 'ere_.. 1 - 107604 OANIELS TIRE SERVICE $1,875.09 TRUCK TIRES y 107605 OE ANZA CORPORATION S150.00 EQUIPMBNT RENTAL r �i' EF Lip,0 A;g2C ATE. 1 t ,, },4S rc 1 PRINTER a" `* �..� tt� 1 ;'": c r 1A76de ' �- d H hRiQT -2f+ Fb ? .. a #x, .v a"$ if .` �` ., aPFIdE:.R9NP - � �' ; ' `* '- � 107610 DON JOSE 47 9278.75 REFUND USER FRE OVEBPATMBNI'� 107611 JOSEPH S. DODGE, P.E. $902.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 10761 UNN EDY 90S;CO PA 4 t A Ei u�Yaa k tY.�is per ' ;k 1 id7611 RNA SEPP CE,f I I Ci 2: W n ."Ab05.97ti � { CINtERI # NO $eRraue III SICE RIRP.TRA 107616 ECOANALYSIS. INC. „ $1.794.87 OCEAN RESEARCH 107617 ECOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING 6 ANALT $5,375.00 MEAN RESEARCM ENVIRONMENTALE O D7039. 1'ST SAND AND'GR VE 0p NCl A2G9•§4 eun,dffiG NAT IAL 1TI 107620 y FACI� Eg SUPPORT C� 313.3R lrvSMALLdARDNAR$ -� 6$l > MARS ALL FAI NNE9 ��" Ot68 nRlca6 PMM mRt�a#R 4rfihM ....$'S$ 107622 JOHN S. FALKENSTEIN P.E. $3,637.50 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-6, 3-20.3-17 107623 FEDERAL EMPRESS CORP. S241.50 AIR FREIGHT 7620 R 6E.86 yenPANK 76z Li_P,GUPp�_ t . A3 6.19. c®uRlRAxldN PARTS 101626 ISCMER L PORTER COr 33r50 L06 SdBTRUNBNT PARTS td N L ( 1 f FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/13/3' F.GE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 1 `CLAIMS PAID 0611010 POSTING DATE 4OW06 107627 FLUID TECH 31.685.19 MECHANICAL PARTS 207fi28 FORIll f ' 1D7629 POUN TTAI 'VALLEY bAMEAA $341.31 VILLA h. . T. Mi i1 _.00,;3 - �AipT eSPPLTes °; ;107630 FOUN AIN VALLEY PAI t70B . .. .nA 1vw... .ue f ' 107632 A.F. FREY $105.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 107633 CITY OF FULLERTON $52.90 WATER USEAGE 107635 r/p; . GENERAL tgLEPHONE Eb{ ' � 6AAP�;#q 1YIxT'* }'a 1 ihts7EDMl eeAb36e8 ' OT636 y `T .'BE 98E LEECH { g15,0. II�TES f, 1 'r 6 i 1'} 4 }'S INSTAIM&TT 6'IIP �.I§9 h4'4�U' . -G' k 4 .nr.J., JS£ n' 107638 'GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION $800.00 STREET SWEEPING SERVICES fTi 107639 GREENVIEW DATA, INC. $72.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE Z C n -1�iu d "°-1HAgqMA VU'POs s.� ,r '; , Tft`,J6 , i r � POW? PARTS 9'i61 1• NEp ._y RPt t A' 1 §eegltkd poHe Di$TB23UTIor� .1 a r. TTI 107644 HARCROS CHEMICALS INC. S154.00 LAB SUPPLIES 3 107645 HATCH { KIRKS INC. $616.25 MECHANICAL PARTS o x1676 # 'b .NWA LYo. 3DA rFgIq" 1T ' 'K P , T ' I `I 2gsI' f` .CSNTMbbI� LpN; b $EMD ax CbNf ba� + or. ,.r. . 107650 HOUSE OF BATTERIES $745.31 BATTERIES y �L 167651 HAS. HUGHES CO.. INC. $1.786.08 PAINT SUPPLIES r r— 'I67c a aY ty -- :=.- NoUG7RiAF fiN�E b B .}bbUS�.➢x�• ;. d.u�l ` ?[ - , .COMDdb MT ,; ,{17,656 z IMFILOO i +G rR61G,eyU .. 107656 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $212.99 TRUCK PARTS A 107657 INTERNATIONAL SENSOR TECH. $90.73 INSTRUMENT ('3 b7659 GREA{.WESTERN SANIT AMV SIIPPI 11 g1q{A64 !A�y 1 H JAMITORTAL 6U ill o +y.�, h b7660 JAT1S CATS TpuxrN75PN; biR:i41} x mmEYlAMO $RPEN93 107662 JENSEN TOOLS { ALLOYSIkLLIEN AS f81A.77 INSTRUMUNT/TOOLS I a 7663 JOHNSTDNE SUPPLY f585.07 ELECTRIC PARTS u ' J07665 KAMAN SEAR++NGS 6 SUPPLY i Q.51 ° 71STIMOR 167666 MA HER COMPANY I871a}B TOILS R[NFR BIAAAp A' .eD� 36591iP pK6iM1 n<po ppy nypPydVNpuT 5 107666 1AS SAFETY PRODUCTS $30.76 SAFETY SHOES 107669 KELLEY BLUE BOOK $47.00 PUBLICATION 107A?I - PAR T1N MOpDICk 8R. - A�++200H0 - CONBTROOTION SBBVICES 144-IB.5-34-1.H-35-1 ID7672 N:Y• LAMBASTEN A COOT INC: fSS0.S0 ' SOIL TH6VINI N.b.6 14-09 W NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/13/9C PAGE A REPORT NUMBER AP43 W DIT� F__OaAx r COUNTY CL0 M8'%AID o6/26/90 POSTING DATE 061WID' 7 . WARRANT WA, v ENnnR ne.CR•osAnY r ' 107673 JUDY LEE f64.15 MILEAGE EXPENSE LEE S1'RWEIT PA T ' 10767E LE N01' cRA ALL 0 ASSOC T. {A 66Q.90 ENGINEERING SERVICES + C807bCB$3CA4 10767E .LOCAL A6ENCT 2SOa60 _ LAPCO PEE. yy�A S !l1 s66�2i PHD1'OG9ACHTC_3 ^Vlfo^ 1076?6 M-T-M $2,145.32 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 107679 M0.GOM[D f187.20 SERVICE AGREEMENT Rn xu LOL !! GINHERIMO_Seev... C NOT so, '60 MARSHA..MARYACL ELETN OM} RdbUe}#pf�EVIDEOS * ' Y"?a bf j 'R� M A4u 5+ INSTRUMENT BIIPPLiRB, Akrr tAIOFiAr (, 1076BA MCM ASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. $148.34 MECHANICAL PARTS IT1 ]07605 MEASURENENT CONTROL $VS. INC. $316.63 FITTINGS z107ARI P.--S d n H 1076ET ;R o6A1bE i oFopil c # + • R" nd ' PARIS 1016e N PPLIM .b � Nt �rtl x� '.bidi11b3 —i 107640 MORTON SALT AND/ON $440.45 SALT 3 N ' 107691 NDTION INDUSTRIES. INC. $110.16 MECNAMICAL PARTS >> 6 ,'. 10769A T! ?M570R OLA bE1EU C^y'k•1�• r S l •3i38@$@$A h"y'v� CELLULAR 'TeLBPbORP EN 4 7 1076R1 'r 'NEC rt hA w' ,, j flirt tT:' .�ri � =tFv.:. :r- d 4eFIDE"buPPLt§b � "� .:. O DIGNN... i "BA A Nr i iJer. Y ny1•}t1y f E.....6a 5 a6._ A", h 1 - H - 10769E NATIONAL INFORMATION DATA CTR. $53.45 PUBLICATION �<. ' 107697 NATIONAL LUMBER 611000.62 HARDWARE r 0769y Ir1§ r'Ct Y 0FA NEY ORNTT BE C u f .eeTT' y P �r' b .Oq N � }(F I WATH0. USRA0 Ha r ( • �'i0TT03 ( vH a�Q?M.S.(SO(y A6.OI3}�031 py Nr HI" 6.• Ettlxyy/0pp 'u" .'}u "P'N d TRASH BfN `q�ry���' O A. YdH, nrru0AC1 RNA 'J 81 n4 'i7�k" a r3,+k ' .0 iBd'Iss] .•,- ...a�Pk S.S' BAeETFa589 107702 DK SYSTEMS CO. $45,907.70 CHLORINE M.0.2-16-90 (n 107703 ORANGE BEARING. INC. $563.65 HARDWARE 1 R nRAMAr CD♦ 107705 - ORANOE.COON tY AUP�1R S.CO. ""• ' fI06.52 TRUCK PARTS t"t f 10770E GRAN OE,C!A LVE S FIT71110 Cb. #A90.39 FITTINGS 10Z707nvvR PN cravYcE_ Ito{;.HO_ 66crili+v.0Ago. P Cn 10770E COON TT OF DRAN61 f1U.522.01 SERVICE AGREEIENTS - RADIO EQUIPMENT 107709 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT f6.669.96 REIMBURSE MEATUS COMP INSURANCE es p�OL_gOPPI X Or D.C.) }1 SSS.LA . . •u3LD�NC MAT—TA' i6771 <-PAt IF IC %ART;, }1.7 eA Ro REGISTRATION 107712 PAOI IC AF11EI7T EOQIP NEN7 C9. tlix622.55 SAPEI'F SUPPLIES 't ACTH AA s AULAR 'Pr TOM.,& 98001ceaB 107714 PALLETS 6 ACCESSORIES CO. $1.519.55 PALLETS 107715 PEACHTREE BUSINESS FORMS f75.00 PARKING TAGS R771A PrLLEI]LB_I JONES sr00_Ty LH.AL 9ER}{r^° - KSOPD PROPBRTY IOTT11 NOT PENOER6RAFT AA05.00 REFETAE MP O CO DIStH10U1'10A 10771E PM OTO A SOUND CO. f266.23 AENTAL RQUIrmamm L"O I 3= H FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/I3/90 PAGE 5 A Ct REPORT NUMBER AP43 tz COON;rAN11AT10N_O1 SIR 1 C-T -OF�O ANGE. rn' NU CLI MS PAID 06/20/90 POSTING DATE 06/2090 . O ' flEANLeIna VENDnh AA DUN3 DE4Ep.1x31DN ' ' 1 �, • 107719 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS. INC. $43.647.15 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88 .� • nTT26 frer11"RUEWLIIE H--DNA-r 77 A.S 107771 POLYPNNE, lmci dq 0AS6kA 70 VbLTMRR M.D.1-10-90,6-9 89 . r ' 10 127 " P0.[¢pP ENREg PAyI 6 Bi. tNC 12 BV p10y1 AePBE PAVING . 7 a4 .;rv'rr .1gn.0 b rkol},¢ '1nr �A4A D0 il 10772A THE PROJECTS SOLUTION CO. $3,975.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION H.0.8-10-88 ' 107725 FABRIC U.S.A.• INC. 3102.13 MACHINE REPAIR • T•. 9•r `$66+n6 Su vwn '. IS 7d7 ,. B TE fNCI S49i020.00 EL000H REMOVAL 0,6,5-11-66 / '1p17de d Y Nu sNOEg i 01 9E + SATETE ssoke n • . NF `T ' Ep,�L/AT6S6 ( i204 a41 yr errern ueTVP Gt 187730 THE REGISTER $1,022.09 NOTICES 6 ADS m f 107731 REMOTE METER RESETTING SYSTEM S3.000.00 POSTAGE Z n 19173 , JJ , s �jjdAC c( S N;110 RL@It G fi♦g} up ,1' 4 j n. �.g ► !,,'� �"' n r NeOwlxIOAL PAgid +rtt' �, h•; I j4 rxFl r 1 . 107 1 A ;.. k 4A R' EERY$ r,•,,i{ h'8' ",j7" � A 17 4p0 - i,°y?II _.{EN6TRVC1'ION J-�� )Ytl4 I.,.r r '• ' ry � w gf 4l Arkd'.bn. 4Op',rld^.a, . �A..1Ldd a+"90rNA44 f118ECSICrnv k '..�Iw,L _r � ..) ITT 107736 S A J CHEVROLET 931.91 TUCK PARTS 3 / r 107737 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. $132.80 PARTS CLEANER c 107739 /' )il + A A.NA U,1 ASHF .([� IWE t ' ,( rlgq�v d. ¢6:` �' fir.n� REFUND U6 PP§�-6VERFAlFftf p r jo771yp ;dra E CE IPp d1j6 k�r P j ' t a a:,� 6 �2�:, fbj ...,° R.On.a,0 8 14 d1 i;,i Nark° ' OtlAi < 1a h a.,.i SV E6 t' 1 't 107742 CITY OF SEAL BEACH S123.50 WATER USEACS D -r 107743 SHAMROCK SUPPLY 9702.30 HARDWARE I T• -Ell • 140,774 s t, ' t i f 'rE d suroi i-!gyp tom. Pr wit s. ]15 Iv?! ^� z•i PLUMOINU RUPPL k6 ,. TOOL ' d n AEE .t', , . P A I l. , rngolrtRB dnTTWetiv y 107748 SOIL AND TESTING ENGINEERS $293.00 SOIL TESTING H.0.6-14-89 107749 SOLAR TURBINES INC. 9894.26 GENERATOR REPAIRS M—Lamp cnOT.F ru TF_ rm Gnu rn. eaA i4 PnNER 1V7751 SO. CAL. OAS OD. {, 13s16 NATURAL GAS I E0I 752 SOUTHERN COONS9(ES 41L Co. 6 B.yy4 kiSiL FUEL I 1+ Cn a SPArFGAWFA Av6tFMaA 1Nra ��.k 'ij�A,iO n9Prr� nr tPw 187754 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $6.75 WATER DISPENSER 2. 107755 STAMEN Z. SPASSOFF. P.E. S4.320.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-I.J-19-2 IPm r en- a.99b. oy �� • 10775A dTERLIMGNART NPANYi. fNt. 111164.19 6EAi c 0VeE4IEs { < y� 1 kv,lin { fl7IS9—_aMN+ARi1 L/NnaCar S MA1NT. K]}E1t.On CONTRACT FE6DNDskkEkIN1j�1.6.rt-9-8 107760 :JPELCO. INC. $110.28 CHEMICALS 107761 SUPER CHEM CORP $1.498.12 CHEMICALS 716 6001-9A TOOLc 10T763 J•'WAYNE 11YLVEAtEN 1441•ER ME6ITN0 kETENSE 107761 TAYLON`DUNN R302.81 ELECTRIC CART PARTS x yr. NO NO 9199 JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/13/90 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COOK pN BIS7RICIS_QE_QHAN61 '.UNTY 1 CL INS PAID 06/20/90 POSTING DATE 06/20/90 . m 107765 TECH SCIENCE $325.54 MECEAHiCA1 PARTS 1077A1 1 p LL,, r-7 LEOYNE'MON qqCH NypOBER 35 I.�T TRUCK ARTS (^ 1017 � N l"OS;.. HERWANAL7T1EML� TN0I�NORCAL A190 O0 LAB 3EaVIGE3 `z k AP.dAOaen TRAWRI RGESiGiR 107770 ~n TRUCK S AUTO SUPPLY. INC. 5817.97 TRUCK PARTS 107771 TWINING LABORATORIES OF $4.438.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89 10777 1 of UNOCAL ' t , p'y 4` + i¢¢f f@ r I e "z1i UNL 10 7 �' +. :b,UNIRO{� L CNEM�CAL 1" "` � '` � 1. {TiO .b WONG 08E5'PSR,Q y s �w_d L7 107776 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $132.95 PARCEL SERVICES m 107777 MILLAR ELEVATOR COMPANY $326.15 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE Z CJ YEt€0G( I 1r' 1 s r'G1' -a: �0 ld s `- r` LABUme SUPPLI 1 L �, ITT " 2'3A ' s yl 7782 PA 3 LTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC S294.03 - ELECTRIC SUPPLIES m �. 107783 JOHN A. MAPLES S533.75 ODOR CONTROL CONSULTANT AN u •- 1765f 1 •,' M tl U N b r r t 3. �" t,•+ CA3EnG 50 A ,G 9 '. t yy r i i d' N �. o ` . xi' rp 'v 4 Lb s0 J :fit ao ' . : 5�b�0 t GMA:NaaglNa�aev 0 ; 1��. t. '.I i,. 1 =` 10778a ROUBLE It WOODRUFF SA31188.92 LEGAL SERVICES M.0:6-4-89 n 107789 RER L. AANOERS i250.00 REFUND LAFCO ME r 0 y 'B@D 4 TARO Y'N i7 ' s its., Pti f., gg011yQ " ,, r : V P 8i- } �y , - A77 1N � � �� -N} .ia , 1+''1 ,h ..:. ' !d' Y &' #CAitTF 'fv' rTl. a, ,A yR , y 107794 CHARLES E. SYLVIAF $954.00 DIRECTORS COMP --------------- � y 9AQ �i's#,� �� y.. ,75 � L .4C� I gtt�.P,Erit.�:.`` ,s k''.�'�p{� t�'• m C POND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/13/90 PACE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY I s y ppvwyi.p CLAIMS PAID 9 . POSTING PATE 06 20 90 SUMMARY - AMOUNT DOEf 9 ( . 82 OPER PUND �axi��x Bs 765.33 " F3 GAP FAG FUND 4,8r .,;, , U §66.12 �., o. 03 CAP PAC POUND 22,556.07 OS OPEN FUND 5,342.50 bb r 9d OPER POUND i'i u` �r .. 'Y kry '` III y'. } ,. x �IE9.26 a y tF�" 'q FI Dies FUNDjai e A. - �i905r5� .}I'r.i ,`a 7 + k .x ,k€ 2r5u.: G R1 Oil OPER FUND 6.462.56 Z , Fl4 OPER POND 887.25 ... n , e. „ yr 1 111 la cw.,.e T k+11 + F51 6UPeR Oin"y yItl,Sg ^` ut1: f a1 e' raid f h FSdi4 oeeR eJaB'.j'M =*•' 1 3 C ix urtu. rum 013,41"1 DORF " 331,418.17 SELF FUNDED WORKERS CW INSURANCE FUND 9,DD6.36 JT NO s/ a r Ana§ ';"F .�a a ,�.�Y � `'3']` G y:. S,_ 'r '{O u=•` tJ, y ,x„�: (A *tip a izi FS5, ,i` e t 1 t' l ."" �'ar, . r; y ,'I r 1�7 ''`+.ILL V — RESOLUTION NO. 90-66-1 �..' AUTHORIZING FILING FOR FEDERAL AND STATE CLEAN WATER RANT - 1 NT WORKS IMPROVEMENTSAND ADOITI N A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE EXECUTION AND FILING OF DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDERAL AND STATE CLEAN WATER GRANTS AND LOANS UNDER 33 U.S.C. , 1251 ET SEQ.; AND CHAPTERS 12.5, 13, 14 AND 15; DIVISION 7 OF THE CALIFORNIA WATER CODE ON BEHALF OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AND PROVIDING CERTAIN ASSURANCES x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT: Section 1: An Act of Congress known as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (also known as the Clean Water Act and the Water Quality Act of 1987) (33 U.S.C., 1251 at seq.) provides for federal grants and loans for construction of sewage treatment works. Section 2: The State Clean Water Bond Laws of 1970, 1974, 1978 and 1984 and implementing statutes authorize the State Water Resources Control Board to enter into contracts with public agencies for State grants and loans for construction of sewage treatment works. Section 3: County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County is a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3, Division 5, of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California, for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk sewer system for the collection of sewage from the cities and other local sewering agencies, and has joined with other County Sanitation Districts - namely, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, in constructing, operating and "C-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-1" maintaining joint sewage treatment plants and disposal facilities under an agreement dated July 1, 1985, known as the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement. Section 4: In accordance with the terms of said Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement, County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California acts for itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, each organized for similar purposes and serving different territories, all in Orange County, California, for the purpose of constructing and operating said joint sewage treatment plants and disposal facilities. Section 5: By means of this Resolution and of the Resolutions set forth below by number, the following County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California have authorized the filing of applications for grants and loans under said Acts of Congress and said Clean Water Bond Laws and have authorized County Sanitation District No. 1 to file said applications on their behalf: DISTRICT NO. RESOLUTION NO. 2 90-67-2 3 90-68-3 5 90-69-5 6 90-70-6 7 90-71-7 11 90-72-11 13 90-73-13 14 90-74-14 Section 6: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, is hereby authorized and directed -to sign and file for and on behalf of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, acting for itself and as agent for County "C-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-2" Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, Application for a Federal Grant and/or Loan for Sewage Treatment Works under 33 U.S.C. , 1251 at seq. , and a State Grant and/or Loan for Clean Water under the Clean Water Bond Laws of 1970, 1974, 1978 and 1984, for a joint project generally described as follows: 1990-91 Joint Works Improvements and Additions Section 7: District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, hereby agrees and further does authorize the aforementioned representative to certify that if a federal grant or loan for its project is made pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C., 1251 et seq.) , it will pay the remaining cost of the approved project; it will provide proper and efficient operation and maintenance of the approved project after completion of construction thereof; it will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (F.L. 88-352) and the regulations issued pursuant thereto and state that the assurance and compliance with such regulations attached to the application for federal grant or loan applies to this project; and it will comply with requirements of Executive Order 11246 pertaining to equal employment opportunity in federally-assisted construction contracts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 11, 1990. \.i' "C-3" AGENDA ITEM #11(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-3- COUNTY Aanmrm aN DIMPICTS OF O8ANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELT.TC AVENGE FLMMLIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA92708 MUM ORDER C. O. NO. Six (6) OC7TRALTOR: GENERAL ELECTRIC MTANY GAPE July 11. 1990 JOB: P2UnKII7CBASE AND INSTALLATION OF VARIABLE FREMENCY DRIVE SYSffiLLS AND PUMPS FOR OCEAN OUTFALL BOOSTER STATION "C" AT PLANT No. 2, JOB NO. J-15A Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ (72,000.00) In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - EFFICIENCY TESTING The Contract specifications, Section 50-12 Efficiency Guarantee, require that field tests be node on all five Pcmgrs, motors and variable speed drives to dare the guaranteed efficiency set by the Contractor at the time of bid to the actual field efficiency. The specifications state that, should the field tests show that the actual overall efficiency differs more than 0.50 percent from the guaranteed overall efficiency as shown on the bidding farm, the Districts w311 adjust the contract price, as follows: 0.90 Average efficiency of pungrs developed by actual tests x91.39 Average efficiency of variable control drives - calculated 82.30 Average overall efficiency + 0.50 Efficiency tolerance adjustment (Allowed per specification) 82.80 Average Overall Efficiency 83.40 Garanteed overall efficiency by Contractor (Per Contract) -82.80 Average overall efficiency 0.60 Price Adjustment Factor $120,000.00 Present worth of electricity for a project period of 20 years and a one pioent difference in overall efficiency. $120,000.00 x 0.60 Project Adjustment Factor - $72,000.00 credit due OCSD. DEDUCTED COST THIS CRANGE ORDER ITEmi $ (72,000.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANCE CRDER - M: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL, DEDUCTED COST THIS (EANCE ORDER: $ (72,000.00) �../ TOM TIM EXTENSION THIS CHANC£ CRDER: 0 Calendar Days "D-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-1" COUNTY SANr=CN DISTRICTS OF CRANGE CaRny Page 2 of 3 P. 0. Bet 8127 - 10844 RrT,TG AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFCRNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Six (6) CONTRACICR: GENERAL ELECTRIC =TANY DATE July 11, 1990 JOB: PREPURCHASE AND INSTATTamrCN CF VAR= FftG(7[IENCY DRIVE SYSTEMS AND PUMPS FOR OCEAN CUTFAIZ BOOSTER STATION "C" AT PLANT No. 2. JOB NO. J-15A The additional cork contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime cork and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, amept as &xpressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SU[• QM OF CONTRACT TINE Original Contract Dates September 30, 1986 Original Contract Time 730 Calendar Days Original Completion Date September 28, 1988 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Tice Extension 55 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 785 Calendar Days Revised Completion Date Novemllei 22, 1989 Tice Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 4,025,440.00 Prey. Ruth. Changes $ (70,349.82) This Change {Add{. (Deduct) $ (72,000.001 Amended Contract Price $ 3,883,090.18 V./ "D-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(b) - ALL DISTRICTS aD-2" r COUNW cnMMCN DISTRICTS OF ORAL COUNTY Page 3 of 3 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 EDLLS AVENUE FL7[IIJPAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Six (6) CONTRACTCR: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY DATE July 11. 1990 JOB: PREPOACBASE AND INSTAL AMION OF VARTAEM FREQUENCY DRIVE SYSTEMS AND PUMPS FOR OCEAN OU1'F'A7r. BOOSTER STATION "C" AT PIAN1 NO. 2, JOB NO. J-15A Authorization Date: July 11, 1990 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COMM, CALF IIArL �. n RECOME DED BY: Cdwtmation Manger Date SAL ELECTRIC COMPANY ACCEPTED BY: X7BYS Contractor Date of Date "D-3" AGENDA ITEM #11(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 8 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELISS AVENUE `..� FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALINURNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Thirty '(30) CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE July 11, 1990 JOB: HEADWORES NO. 2 AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-20; AND DENX=ON OF DIGESTERS NOS. 1, 2 AND 4; REPLACEMENT OF BOILER; PIPING CLEANOVIS; AND GRADING AND PAVING AT PIANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-31 Amount of this Change Order (,TxU) (Deduct) ($ 35,426.581 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as c®pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Job No. P1-20 Item 1 - COVER REVISIONS AT EXISTING BEADS The Contractor was directed to furnish and install five plexiglass cover plates over openings in new covers at existing Headworks No. 1. Tao plexiglass cover plates were required over openings between piping penetrations not shown on the contract drawings. Three plexiglass cover plates were installed over openings created by the removal of sluice gate operators. The removal of these sluice gate operators occurred after fabrication of the new covers at the existing Heedwcrks and was not shown on the Contract Drawings. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: ECO 236) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 602.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - EXTRA WORE AT EXISTING INFTUIENT CHANNEL The Contract plans required the Contractor to remove a portion of the existing influent runnel wall in order to connect the new barscreen discharge channel to the existing influent channel. The record drawings from which the existing influent channel was ccnstmetei show the wall to be 12 inches thick. The actual thickness of the wall was discovered to be 15 inches. The Contractor was directed to sawout through the entire wall tc complete contract work in this area. The extra costs involved with this item include the difference in cost between saucutting equipment required for a 12-inch versus a 15-inch wall. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: ECO 238) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,397.00 T2ME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "E-I AGENDA ITEM #11(C)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-1" e CCUM T SANrmmmrCN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE CO'JNW Page 2 of 8 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 FrrT S AVENUE FOUNPAIN VALLEY, Cnr.r aMA 92708 CHANCE ORDER C. O. NO. Thirty (301 CMIRA=: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE July 11, 1990 JOB: HEADWORRS NO. 2 AT PIANP NO. 1, JOB ND. P1-20: AND Dannr.rrrCN OF DIGEST'ER.S NOS. 1, 2 AND 4: REPIACEMMr OF BAILER: PIPING CLEANONIS: AND GRADING AND PAVING AT PIANP NO. 1, JCB NO. P1-31 Item 3 - MIORSEEN OBSTRUC,TICN AT EXISTING C.Rfl1MIE AREA The Contractor was directed to repair a 6-inch plant water line that was damaged during asphalt rem , operations adjacent to the wasting He-darks Facility Chlorine Area. The Contractor was also instructed to locate, expose and remove, if necessary, several abandoned underground utilities encountered during asphalt removal and replacement activities in this same area. The 6-inch plant water and the underground utilities were not shown on the contract plans. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 235, FCO 237) ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER MEM: $ 4,036.00 TBIE EXMISICN THIS CHANCE CRDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 - ELEC 'RICAL MODIFICATIONS AT DRAMM LIFT STATIC] The contract plans called for the installation of a new duplex submersible sump pump at the new Drainage Lift Station. The poop motors were to be electrically connected to the existing sump pump controller, motor starters and circuit Makers. Becamse of the increase' capacity of the new pimps, the Contractor 'was directed to replace the two existing 15-amp circuit breakers with two 30-aup motor circuit protectors. The Contractor was also instructed to upsize the existing thermal overload protectors to accommodate the new 7.5 HP motors. These modifications were required to allow for proper operation of the lift station and were not shown on the Contract plans. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 130, FCO 234) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,108.00 TINE EXTENSIC] THIS CHANGE ORDER MEMM: 0 Calendar Days "E-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(C)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-2" COIIIJi1 SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 8 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 1?1-1 C AVENUE FCUNPAIN VALLEY, CALIF MA, 92708 CHANGE �DFR C. O. NO. Thirty (30) CONTRACIOR; Kieait Pacific Co. DATE July 11, 1990 JOB: HF.ADh17RRS NO. 2 AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-20; AND DFML=ON OF DIGESTERS LA'S. 1, 2 AND 4; REPLACEMENT OF BOILER; PIPING CLEANOUTS; AND GRADING AND PAVING AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-31 Item 5 - PIPING LODIFICATIOLIS AT BAR.SC M AND CEIDRFNR BUILDINGS The Contractor was directed to investigate the cause of the failure of the bubbler system in the Barscxeen Building. It was determined that the failure of the system was not the responsibility of the Contractor. This item includes labor costs involved with the investigation. Also included in this item axe extra costs associated with the furnishing of additional quick- isconnect hose connections for the Districts' installation on the chlorine piping system in the Chlorine Building. At the the request of the Districts' M =tenarx:e Department, the Contractor was directed to furnish two additional complete hose connections to aid in the purging of the chlorine lines with dry air. These additional hose connections were given to the Districts for future installation and were not shown on the Contract Drawings. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 229 and 233) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER TIEM: $ 958.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 6 - MODIFICATIONS AT EXISTING CHICRINE TON CYLINDER FACTTlmv Currently, ton cylinders are loaded and unloaded at Headworks No. 1 Chlorine Facility on a set of steel xail.s embedded in the asphalt paving outside the Chlorine Building. Due to the fact that the existing asphalt paving was overlayed and elevations in this area were raised under this project, the Contractor was directed to remove the rails and replace them after final grade of the new asphalt paving was determined. The work associated with the rails was not addressed in the contract documents. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: ECO 230) ADDED COST THIS CM*M ORDER ITEM: $ 4,654.00 TIME EX'ffi1SION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Caler-iar Days "E-3" AGENDA ITEM #11(t)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 8, P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 UT AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALITIORN A 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Thirty (30) CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE July 111 1990 ,GOB: BFAIIAORRS NO. 2 AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-20; AND DFMOf.=CN OF DIGFSTERS KIDS. 1, 2 AM 4; REPLACEMENT OF BOILER; PIPING CLEANONTS; AND GRADING AND PAVING AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-31 Item 7 - ADDED WORK AT WOMTIdG REAMERS Dr-',+ARGE CHANNEL AND NET WELL The existing Headworks bexscreen influent channel and grit chamber areas were required to be drained to allow for the Contract-spBaified polyurethane coating of interior concrete. The Districts were not able to completely shut off drainage flows to these area due to the age and condition of existing valves. The Contractor was directed to build temporary bulkheads on the required drain Lima to allow for contract work to proceed. Also included in this item are costs for the removal of unanticipated doh= f= the work area after the affected area were drained. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 228) ADM) COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,035.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITP74: 0 Calendar Days Item 8 - TENEURARY WEIR INSTALIATICN AT EXISTING GRIT CHAMBERS The Contractor was directed to furnish and install a temporary wooden vertical extension at the existing discharge weirs in the grit chambers at existing Head,mrks No. 1. The weir wall extension was not shown on the contract plans and was required to prevent flow in the new 72-inch primary influent line from backing up into Junction Structure "A" through the existing 72-inch primary influent line and into the existing grit chambers. A dry condition was necessary in the existing grit chambers h,Hn the Contractor's polyurethane application to the grit chamber walls and floor. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 226) ADDED COST THZS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,216.00 TINE EXTENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 9 - EXTRA WORK ASSOCIATED WITH ABA� METER VAULT During excavation for a 6-inch drain line to be placed underground between the Drainage Lift Station and an adjacent catch basin, the Contractor discovered a large undisclosed, abandoned concrete meter vault. The Contractor was directed to pothole as required to define the Limits of the obstruction, and provide additional labor and material to routs the drain Line around the vault to avoid a Cal irt_ Ty minimize . sts the Vault was not removed Under this Contract, but is well defined on this project's record drawings. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 227) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER TTEP1: $ 3,316.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE CMDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "E-4" AGENDA ITEM #11(c) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS -4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE CODNIY Page 5 of 8 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 RUN AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANCE ORDER C. 0. NO. Thirty (301 CONTRACTOR: Riewit Pacific Co. DATE _ July 11. 1990 JOB: HEADWORKS NO. 2 AT PIANP NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-20: AND nannr.r CN OF DI(ESffiLS NOS. 1, 2 AND 4: REPLACEMENT OF BOILER: PIPING CLEANOUTS: AND GRADING AND PAVING AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-31 Item 10 - UNDISCLOSED UTILITIES AT DRAINAGE LIFT STATION During the construction of the Drainage Lift Station, the Contractor encountered pipeLha s that were not shown on the Contract Drawings. The Contractor was directed to support and protect the 6-inch plant water and the 4-inch natural gas pipelines that were not shown on the Contract Drawings. Extra costs were also involved with locating and investigating an abandoned 2-inch city water pipe. in a previous Change Order the existing Bin loading Facility was relocated to an area just west of the contract specified Lift Station location. During construction of the Lift Station, the access to the relocated Bin Landing Facility was required to remain open. This added restriction hampered construction activities of the Lift Station and was not shown or mentioned in the Contract documents and involved some additional costs. This item was negotiated with the Contractor Pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 222 (231) ADDED COST THIS CHANCE OFM TIM: $ 4,873.00 TINE EXTENSION THIS CMUM ORDER I184: 0 Calendar Days Item 11 - INEUE ' PUMP CI9C= MODIFICATIONS The Contractor was directed to perform extra work related to the influent pumps. The Districts requested that additional pressure switches be added to the bubbler panels to activate a shutdown of punp(s) when a wet well level descends below a low level set point. The Contractor also incurred additional expenses to troubleshoot a condition of e.N:ess vibration at the influent pumps, which resulted from the motor being set to run at "critical speed." This item was negotiated with the Contractor Pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 205 PCH 117, 117A)_ ADDED C0ST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 14,032.42 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days 11E-5" AGENDA ITEM #11(C)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-5" COUNTY SAHITATIM DISMUCfS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 6 of 8 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 FES S AVENUE _ FOUNnUN VALLEY, QUaEaUM 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Thirty 1301 C:ONTRA=: Eiewit Pacific Co. DATE July 11, 1990 JOB: HEAONURKS NO. 2 AT PIANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-20: AND DEMON OF DIGESTERS NOS. 1, 2 AND 4: REPIACCEMENT OF B0=ER: PIPING CLP.ANOWS; AND GRADING AND PAVING AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-31 Item 12 - POLYURETHANE COATING DF.I& CNS The Contractor was directed to reduce the specified polyurethane coating applications in two areas. Due to subsurface water intrusion at the existing Headwcrks No. 1 structures, polyurethane coating of the floors in this area was deleted from the Contract. In addition, the Districts opted to accept a portion of the Sunflower Pump Station screw puap flights that was coated to a mil thickness of between 60 and 125 mils, in lieu of the Contract specified 75 mil minim= thickness. It was deteradmed that a mininuut Ming of 60 mils was adequate for the type of service. The coating deduction resulted in a credit to the contract. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: ECO 239) DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: ($ 8,500.00) TIME ELISION THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 13 - CIFU= BREAIM MODIFICATIONS Prior to the seven (7) day operational test, a Districts, inspection revealed that the short circuit interrupting current rating (hereafter referred to as "rating") for circuit 1,reake s at the motor control centers (mnc,$) "AC" and "AD" was less than required for potential actual current loading. The Contractor was directed to replace the furnished circuit breakers (30,000 aup rating) with upsized circuit breakers (50,000 sup rating). in a related issue, the two VED circuits for the main influent p:mgs, previously fed from MCC,s "AC'• and "AD,,, were required to feed directly fry switchgear 3A-AA and 3A-AB. This change helped to avoid a delay of the seven day test that would have been caused by procurement of the upAzed circuit breakers. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: (RPC 917) ADDED CObT THIS CHANGE CRDFR TTEM: $ 5,000.00 TIME EXIENSICN THIS CHANC ORDER PPEM: 0 Calendar Days "E-6" AGENDA ITEM #11(C)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-6" COMM S017ATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COMM Page 7 of 8 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 M1,I3 AVENUE FIXn= VALLEY, alln- WM 92708 CMV42E ORffi2 C. O. NO. Thirty (30) CODOWI di: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE July 11. 1990 JOB: HEAUNIMS NO. 2 AT PLANT NO. 1, J® NO. P1-20; AND DEtCLITION OF DIGEMMRc NOS. 1. 2 AND 4; REPIACEMENT OF BOILER: PIPING CLEANOUTS; AND GRADING; AND PAVING AT PLANT I.U. 1, JCS NO. P1-31 Job No. P1-31 Item 14 - DIGESTERS 5 AND 6 HOT MI'ER PIPING NDDIETCATION S The Contractor was directed to modify existing hot water piping at the heat el=hange loops for Digesters 5 and 6. These revisions were not shown on the contract plans but were necessary in order to properly integrate the higher pressure connections to and from the new P1-31 boiler system and to provide heat to the digesters. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Secttcn 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 125, PCR 129, ECO 219) AD= COST TFrT CHANGE OROER ITEM: $ 4,061.00 = EXTENSICN THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 15 - PAVING DELETIONS The Contractor was directed to delete paving from the contract in the area south of the existing operations Control Center and in the area vacated by the demolition of Diegesters 1, 2 and 4. At the time this project was bid, the scope of future coustrucLim: projects in this area was not knaan. During the construction phase of this project, it was daren=ed that due to future construction activity, new paving in these areas world no longer be required and that its deletion would result in a substantial credit to the Contract. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCO 121) DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM; ($ 77,215.00) TIME EMNSICN THIS CRANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TVTAL DEDUCTED COST TFrr CHANGE ORDER: ($ 35,426.58) TCJTAL TnO EXTENSION TRIS ONCE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change order can be perfaraed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change order, and no direct or indirect., incidental or caaselueatial ems, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Omer. "E-7" AGENDA ITEM #11(r)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-7" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 8 of 8 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELL IS AVENUE - FOMUAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Thirty (301 CONTRACTOR: Kie t Pacific Co. DATE July 11, 1990 JOB: HEADWOME NO. 2 AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. PI-20v AND Dmrclr.=ON OF DIGESTERS NOS. 1, 2 AND 4: Ii21ACEMEmm OF BOILER: PIPING CLEANODfS: AND GRADING AND PAVING AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-31 SE349M OF CONTRACT TINE Original Contract plate October 21, 1987 Original Contract Time 920 Calendar Days Original Completion Date April 27, 1990 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 63 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 983 Calendar Days Revised Completion Date June 29, 1990 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Az l;rahle Actual Final Completion Date Not Az lcnhle Original Contract Price $ 31,458,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 2,467,504.61 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ (35,426.581 Amended Contract Price $ 33,890,078.03 Board Authorization Date: July 11, 1990 COUNTY SANrBMCN DISTRICTS OF ORM= COUNTY, CALIFORNIA '106D By `I -(9- ftr1motion Manager Date ID]•WIT PACIFIC CO. ACCEPTED BY: Zo�f : Contractor Date avineft:ing Die "E-8" AGENDA ITEM #11(C)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-8" RESOLUTION NO. 90-75 �.d ACCEPTING JOB NOS. P1-20 AND P1-31 A CO PLETE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING JOB NOS. P1-20 AND P1-31 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Kiewit Pacific Co. , has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20, and Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts; and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31, on May 18, 1990; and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Director of Engineering has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terns of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20, and Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts; and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated October 21, 1987; and, Section 4. That the Districts' Director of Engineering is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Kiewit Pacific Co. , setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Headworks No. 2 at Plant "F-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(c) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-1" No. 1, Job No. P1-20, and Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts; and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel ; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 11, 1990. "F-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(r_)(2) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-2" COMM SANT TfCN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 Trrx AVENGE FOMWaN VALLEY, CALlEaUTIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Three (3) CONTRACTOR: Gust X. Newberg Construction Co. I197E July 11. 1990 JOB: PRn4W CLARIFIERS NOS. 6-15 AND RELATED FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-33 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (duct) $ 21,667.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - WSCEL AN>ECUS METALS ADDITIONS AND MODIFICATIONS The Contractor was directed to modify the embedded stop plate guides in the Waste Sidestream Pump Station. Also included in this item is the modification of the sputter box trough cover support members. As sham on the contract drawings, the item referenced above required modifications to allow for proper operation of the affected equipment. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: ECO 15 & 16, GM 370-15, GLIN 370-18) ADDED CST THIS CB2WGE ORDER MEM: $ 17,780.00 TIME MMSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - ADDED FENCING AT WEST PERMETER ROAD The Contractor was directed to furnish and install additional fencing along the West Perimeter Road between the recently relocated gate and the plant property line. The additional fencing and the gate relocation were required to maintain plant security. The costs for the gate relocation were incorporated in a previous change order. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 7, GEN 370-12) ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,887.00 TDZ EKM SIGN THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Lays TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 21,667.00 TOTAL TINE EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days "G-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-1" COMN SANIMICN DISIRLICPS OF ORANGE COiR71Y Page 2 of 3 _ P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 E[T•TR AVENUE FOMAIN VALLEY, ('.ni.UUU41A 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Three (3) CC II47A=: Crust K. Newberci Construction Co. DATE July 11, 1990 JOB: PRIMARY CLARIFIERS NOS. 6-15 AND RECA ) FACILITIES AT RECIAMMON PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-33 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed iM� to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, SE146M OF COISPRACP TINE: Original Contract Date November 2, 1989 Original Contract Time 800 Calendar Days Original Completion Date January 11, 1992 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 800 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date January 11, 1992 Actual Final Completion Date January 11, 1992 Tice Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 39,657,000.00 Prey. Auth. Changes $ 66,296.00 This Change (Add) (Dedu&-) $ 21,667.00 Amended Contract Price $ 39,744,963.00 "G-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-2" COMM SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORAWE CC= Page 3 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 PIT.IS AVENUE EOUNTA3N VALLEY, CALZFaeUA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. W. Three (3) CO TRA=: Gust K. Newhem Construction Co. DATE July 11. 1990 JOB: PRIMARY CIARIF KRS NOS. 6-15 AND RELATED FACILITIES AT 1U=.V MCN PTAW ND. 1. JOB No. P1-33 Board Authorization Date: July 11, 1990 COMM SA N=C N DISTRICTS OF ORP m COUNTY, CmJFCRm REM42MMED BY: Camtnmticm Manager Date GUST R. NEWBERG CMiSTRUCTTON CCMPANY ACCEPTED BY: APPROVE BY: &� 4O-/01-90 / ,l Contractor Data or of Engineering Date "G-3" AGENDA ITEM #11(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-3" COUNTY SANrIATrCN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 EfT.TC AVENUE - FOTIIdTAIN VALLEY, CALntMUA 92708 �d CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: Zieharth S Amer DATE July 11. 1990 JOB: GAS HANDLING FA== AT IUMAKMCN PLANT NO. 1. JCB NO. P1-34-1 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Da&act.) $ 52.748.00 In accordance with contract prrmisions, the fallowing changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as cagxmsatLon therefor, the following additions to or 3aAmtion from the contract pry are hereby Item 1 - TREE STUMP F04NAL AT THE CITY WATER PUMP STATION The Contractor was directed to remove an undisclosed large tree trunk from the excavation at the City Water Pump Station. The trunk had previously been buried and was not shown in the contract documents. This item of work was accoupLished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: TCID 1) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,026.00 TIME EXMSION THIS CHANGE ORDER rTEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - MDInCATICN TO TUNNEL No. 8 PIPE SOPPORTH The contract drawings show the proposed 10-inch Plant Sludge No. 1, 10-inch Plant Sludge No. 2, and 10-inch Digester Cleaning pipelines in Tunnel No. 8 to be supported by existing pipe supports. However, the cross members for these existing supports are too sma11 to safely support the proposed lines. Adequate cross meubers were designed and a plan change issued. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 7) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,049.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHAR ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days H-1"" AGENDA ITEM #11(e) - ALL DISTRICTS H-1" CO= SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OHANGE CONXSTY Page 2 of 3 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 RxrT.rc AVENUE FaNnUN VAISBY, rml.MMUM 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (1) TOR: Ziebarth & Aber DATE July 11, 1990 JOB: GAS HANDIJNG_ FACILITIES AT RBUA[PMC N PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-1 Item - ADDED EIECT ICAL DUCT BANK AT RESOURCE M� C12ITER The contract drawings show a spare conduit that nuns continuously from Tunnel No. 3 to the Resource Management Center (Old Personnel Building) through Duct Bank "A" and Duct Bank "B" (DWG: lEll). It has been discovered that no such c=Aiit is available. Therefore a new conduit and ductbank are required to accommodate the AB403A con tors. These conductors are to be connected to the circuit breakers inside the building. AS403A will become the new feeder to the Personnel Building 30 EVA transformer. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCB 2) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,973.00 TIME EXW SION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 - TEMPORARY HIGH PRESSURE DIGESTER GAS PIPING TO EXISTING HEAR+aRKS ENGINES The contract drawings require the removal of the existing 3-inch high pressure digester gas supply line to the existing headworks pimp engines. The Districts requires the continuous operation of these engines and a new temporary Line was designed. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 2) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 44,700.00 TIME EXT@SION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOM ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 52,748.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for. thin Change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. "H-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-2" COUNyq SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3 _ P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ECT•TC AVENUE PaDnA.IN VALLEY, CALIECR IIA 92708 �+.✓ CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Three (3) CONTRACTOR: Ziebarth & Aber DATE July 11, 1990 JOB: GAS aANDILIM FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-1 SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date February 27, 1990 Original Contract Time 730 Calendar Days Original Completion Date February 26, 1992 Tine Extension This C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 730 Calendar Days Revised Completion Date February 26, 1992 Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 13,098,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (Dedu=) $ 52,748.00 Amended Contract Price $ 13,150,748.00 Board Authorization Date: July 11, 1990 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECCMMENDED BY: Construction Manager Date SIEBARTH & ALPER ACCEPTED BY: : f 7 7 Dante Director of Engineering Date ,^ "H-3" AGENDA ITEM #11(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-3" COUNTY SA=TION DISTRICTS OF 0874M OOUNTY Page 1 of 5 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 Ef.T,TC AVENUE FLUMMIN VALLEY, CALIEMODA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Three (3) CONTFP.=; Advanco Constructors. Division of DATE July 11, 1990 Zurn Constructors. Inc. JOB: SLUDGE annmr.LM FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-2. Am=rt of this Change Order (Add) (D-AucL) $ 32,443.52 in accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or detmtions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - ADDITIONAL HOSE VALVE, RACE AND PIPING Details for the new plant water distribut3sm system in existing Tunnel No. 12 called for the installation of 2-inch branch piping to the new Tarpaulin Platform but did not provide for the installation of the require] hose valve, piping and hose rack. This change order item provides for the installation of piping valve fittings and hose rack that were omitted from the plans. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED CYST TffiS CHANGE ORDER TIM: $ 1,144.08 TIME EXTENSION MIS CERM CRUM ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - PFDVI E CDRROSIDN PROTECTION - OC.WD SUPPLY TOM A portion of the existing Orange County Water District (OCWD) supply line that passes through new Junction Box "B" is made with mortar coated steel pipe. Plans did not call for the coating or wrapping of the mortar coated line to protect it from the corrosive atmosphere of the new junction box. This change order item provides for the line to be wrapped with PVC sheet to eliminate eventual dete icr-ation of the existing line. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE CHEER ITEM: $ 2,954.13 TIME E7CTESION TEIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar ]lays "I-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-1" COMaY SANr=CN DL4142iCTS CF CRANGE 00= Page 2 of 5 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLLS AVENUE EOMMaN VALLEY, CALIMM43A 92708 CHANGE Clum C. O. NO. Three (3) CONMRA=: Advanco Constructors. Division of DATE Ju1v 11. 1990 Zurn Constructors, Inc. JOB: SLUDGE aarinr.rnr. FACIL TES AT RECLAMATICN PIANr NO. 1, JCB NO. P1-34-2. Item 3 - lhlcrmrr. ADDITIONAL CM= AT EGECMCAL MANE= NO. 4-22 The plans for the P1-33 basin project indicated that a 2-inch conduit leading from new P1-34-2 Electrical Manhole No. 4-22 to the south was installed. The P1-34-2 drawings did not indicate that the 2-inch conduit for the P1-33 project was to be installed. This change ordPi item provides for the installation of the 2-inch section of conduit required for future use by the P1-33 Contractor. This it® of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST TEES CHANGE CIUM =M: $ 1,265.78 TIME EXTENSION TFrT CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 - INSn ZMCN OF STAnU.ESS STEEG CLOS'ORE PLATES New Junction Box "C" was built around the existing 42-inch effluent line from circular clarifier No. 1 and the 36-inch Orange County Water District brine Line. Closure plates required to blank off two of the four pipe openings in the new boot, after the removal of the pipe, were called out to be "steel" plate. Stainless steel, type 316 was required to withstand corrosive atmosphere in the new junction box. This change order provides for the installation of two 316 stainless steel closure plates in Junction Box "C" in lieu of the plain steel plate called for on the drawings. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE CRDER ITEM: $ 5,072.50 TIME EXONSICN THLS CHANGE CRDER rTEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 5 - LDMERGROMM IIdIEREEEENCE AT NEW SCE DUCMANR Near the completion of the excavation for the new Southern California Edison = service entry ductbank the Contractor uncovered an unidentitied concrete pipeline in the vicinity of the South West Entrance that was in conflict with the alignment of the new ducthank. To avoid the conflict the Contractor was required to re-align the new ducthank. This change order item provides for the additional excavation and concrete slurry backfill required to "re-aligD the new ductbank and eliminate the underground utility conflict. Work was ac-plished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of tha General Provisions. A= COST THIB CHANCE ORDER r1EM: $ 7,345.00 TIME EXnWICN THIS CHANGE CRDER r1EM: 0 Calendar Days "I-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "1-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF GRANGE (SJ= Page 3 of 5 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 SUSS AVENGE FDDNTAIN VALLEY, CALUCHNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Three (3) CONIRACTOR: Pdvanco Constructors. Division of DATE July 11. 1990 Zurn Constructors, Inc. JOB: SLUDGE RAMMING FACILITIES AT RcCM=ON PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-2. Item 6 - ADDITIONAL 2-INCH CONDUITS FOR SOV1'BE[SI CALIFORNIA SWP1'CBGEAR GROMING After the start of the installation of the new 12EV electrical service by the P1-34-2 Contractor, Southern California Edison (SCE) deten6med that additional 2-inch conduits and 4/0 ground cables would have to be installed between each SCE metering section in the new 12HV Service Center and the new electrical manhole located west of same. additional conduit and 4/0 cable is required for grounding SCE devices in the electrical manhole. This work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 9,863.84 TINE EXTENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 7 - REMOVAL OF ABAMONGD DUCTBANX During the perfo=ance of exploratory potholing at the site of the new Plant Water Pimp Station the Contractor uncovered an abandoned electrical ductbank that would interfere with the construction of the new building foundation. This change order ditem provides for the excavation, removal and off-site disposal of the ductbank. This item of work was accomplished by force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,393.05 TINE EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 8 - CHANGE SCRUBBER RE-CIRCUI TION PIPING SIZES - CHICRINE STATION The discharge pipe size at each of the three chlorine booster pumps in the scrubber re-circulation system at the chlorine system was 1-inch. This pipe size was increased to 1' -inch to overcome head losses not anticipated during design. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST IBIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 405.14 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER Ii'ET4: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 32,443.52 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days "I-3" AGENDA ITEM #11(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-3" COT= Sd*1TTATICN DISII2IC15 OF ORANM COUNTY Page 4 of 5 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ItT7.TR AVENUE EOUHI'AIPI VALLEY, 0MUI INIA 92708 CBANGE OF= C. O. W. Three (3) CONTRACTOR: Advanco Contractors. Division of DATE July 11. 1990 Zuni Constructors. Inc. JOB: SGUDG'E EANDLING FAC 1.1= AT RIKIA ATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-2. The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extenci,ma to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore anrtually agreed that no tine is required for this Change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, m=egt as a crassly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUbP90Y OF CONIRAC1 TIME Original Contract Date August 1, 1989 Original Contract Time 600 Calendar Days Original Completion Date March 23, 1991 Time Extension This C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Revises Contract Tice 600 Calendar Drays Revised Completion Date March 23, 1991 Actual Final Ccupletion Date Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 19,085,600.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 237,511.65 This Change (Add) (Dcd<lct) $ 32,443.52 Amended Contract Price $ 19,355,555.17 "I-4" AGENDA ITEM #11(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-4" comny SANITATION DISTRICTS CF ORANGE C0U= Page 5 of 5 P. O. BM 8127 - 10844 EET AVENUE FOIll`1 ON VALIBY, CALIPORNIA 92708 CBANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Three (3) CONPRACPOR: Advanco Constructors. Division of DATE July 11. 1990 Zurn Constructors, Inc. JOB: SLUDGE EQUEfING FAlTTTIRF_c AT REMAKWION PLANP NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-2. Board A,ithorivation Date: July 11, 1990 Cry SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORA M COMM, CAL111MU A REC3440M BY: Cduftaction Manager Date ADM= CMMMICRS, DIVISICN OF ZURN C@b`PRUCXR.S, INC. ACCEPTED BY: BY: Ca � b ,a qv ��. Jl�v to Director of Ekionearing Date "I-5" AGENDA ITEM #11(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-5" COIIIN SANrn mrCN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COONIR Page 1 of 5 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 EIT.T.S' AVENUE FOuNTAM VALLEY, CALUnMA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Nine (9) CONTRACTOR: 2IEBARTE & ALPER DATE July 11, 1990 JOB: WSCELTANECUS NADIFICATIONS APED IMPROVEMENTS TO FACIISTIES AT TREAT !4ENT PTANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-37 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Daduct) $ 115,453.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as ccupensat= therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - RIMOCATION OF UrILrFrF_R AMID PROCESS PIPING - CONVEYOR BUILDING The existing process piping and utilities that were supported along the north wall of Headaorks "C" and the west wall of the Barscreen Room interfered with the construction of the foundation and masonry walls of the new conveyor Building. This change cider item provides for the replacement of pipe, fittings, valves and supports for air, city water, plant crater, natural gas, ferric chloride, and sample lines that interfered with new construction. Work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER PTIM: $ 22,949.00 TIME EXTENNSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - K)DIFICATIONS TO CONCRETE DOMES AT DIGESTERS "A" and "B" After the completion of construction of new concrete domes at Digesters "A" and "B" it was determined that modifications to seismic restraints were required. This change order item provides for the installation of 13 additional 14-inch anchor bolts at the dome-to-wall connection of each digester increasing seismic restraint. Cost of this change order item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER Mali; $ 23,000.00 TIIIE EX? MION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: - 0 Calendar Days "J-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-1" COM?TY SANI CN DLSTRICIS OF ORAL COU= Page 2 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 WIT R AVENGE `...' FagmAIN VALTZy, CAIMUMA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Nine (9) CONIRACOR: ZIEEAR1$ 5 ALPER DATE July 11, 1990 JOB: bESCE ,IANE vnc MODIFICATIONS AND R=JMVIENTS TO FAC77.r IES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB No. P2-37 Item 3 - PROVIDE CARBON FILTER - RAW SEWAGE POWER BUILDING AIR CONDITIONING SYSM Plans describing the general arrange¢e of the air conditioning system for the new Raw Sewage Power wilding indicated that a carbon filter was to be installed in the rooftop duct work. Specifications for the unit were not, however, called out in the Detailed SpecifirotlOna. This change order item provides for the installatim of an upgraded carbon filter unit with a capacity coordinated to the new air conditioning system. The amount of this change order item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. A fair and reasonable credit was received from the Contractor for the carbon filter shown on the plans. ADDED COST THIS CM*M CRDER ITEM: $ 4,250.00 TIME EXTENSICN THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 - MODIFICATIONS TO SCREEIINGS CONVEYOR DRIVE SECPICN The clearance between the top of the belt of the screenings conveyor and the underside of the supports for the drive section just above the belt was less than 6 inches and did not allow articles on the conveyor larger than that to pass through to the screenings hopper. This change order item provides for the modification of the drive section support system, drive chain, and chain guard to increase the clearance between belt and drive to one� foot. The amount of this change order item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,244.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 5 - ADDITIONAL ICN-SKID vmanmamar AT DIGESTERS "A" AND "B" PUMP ROOM ROOF Nan-skid treatment of a portion of the walking surface on the roof of the Digesters "A" and W pump ram roof vas inadvertently emitted from the plans. This change order item provides for the application of additional non-skid roof surfacing in areas not shown on the plans. The amount of this change order item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,188.00 TIML EX'ffiYSIM THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "J-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-2" CO[WTY SANITATION DMIRICTS OF ORANGE CODNTY Page 3 of 5 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 FrT.TR AVENUE �../ FOMWkIN VAUEY, CCALLIECRUA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Nine (9) COTIItACTOR: ZIBBARTB & ALPER DATE July 11, 1990 JOB: MISCELLANEOUS MODIFICATIONS AMID IMPRO 1EMT5 TO FACILITIES AT TAEAnaw PLANT No. 2, JOB NO. P2-37 Item 6 - RE-ROUTE FEEDERS TO MAIN SEKAGE PUMP MOIMS 2 AND 4 Existing utilities, process piping and equipment in Headworks "C" interfered with the installation of the saw sewage pimp: feeders as originally planned and shoran on the drawings. This change order item provides for the installation of the raw sewage pump feeders and controls along an alternative route that was clear of any interferences. Work was accoapllished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,810.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 7 - INSTALLATION OF TWO ADDITIONAL 800-AMP CIRCUIT BREAIKERC FOR, VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE UNITS According to the original plan each of the two variable frequency drives (V&D) for the new, saw sewage pumps were to be fed off of a single 800-amps circuit breaker. This circuit breaker was to feed the VED and the bypass section of the pump drive unit. During the processing of shop drawings for the drive units it was determined that it would be necessary to feed each of the VFD units and bypass sections with separate 800-amps breakers. This change order item provides for the installation of an additional 800-aup circuit breaker to be installed in the bypass section of each variable frequency drive unit. The amwnt of this change order item was negotiate: with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: $ 53,012.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER: $ 115,453.00 TOM TIME ECffi4SION THIS CBAM`3E ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained withi.i this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to th( Contract Time Lade by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is thexaiure mrtually agreed that no time is required for this Change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. "J-3" AGENDA ITEM #11(9) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-3" COONTY SA4II'=C N DLSJYtICIS OF ORANGE CO= Page 4 of 5 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 RrT.T AVENGE FODNTAIN VAL=, allXECRNA 92708 CHANM ORDER C. 0. NO. Nine T91 CONTRACDn2: ZIEBARTH & ALPER DATE July 111 1990 JOB: MISCELIAN30US MODIFICATIONS AND IIMPROVEMENJS TO Fn!`Tr.TmrFS AT TREATMENT PLUM NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-37 SOP DM OF DIGESTER M]1ESiCNE TIME Original Activity Start Date November 2, 1988 Original Activity Duration 300 Calendar Days Original Activity Completion Date August 28, 1989 Adjustnent Milestone Time This Change Order 0 Calendar Days Total Adjustment Milestone Time 6 Calendar Days Revised Activity Duration 306 Calendar Days Revised Milestone Date September 3, 1989 SOM.PM OF CONPFACF TIME Original Contract Date November 2, 1988 Original Contract Time 425 Calendar Days Original Completion Date December 31, 1989 Tine Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 129 Calendar Days Revised Contract Tine 554 Calendar Days Revised Final Conpletion Due Date May 9, 1990 Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Tice Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 5,395,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 378,564.29 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 115,453.00 Amended Contract Price $ 5,889,017.29 u "J-4" AGENDA ITEM #11(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-4" COUNTY SANITATION =9TRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 5 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ETLTp AVENUE FOUNENIN VALLEY, CALLFaUMA 92708 \� CHANGE CRIER C. O. NO. Nine (9) CONTRICTOR: ZIEBARTH & ALPER DATE July 11. 1990 J®: MISCELLANEOUS MODIFICATIONS AND nlPROVEM&M TO FACTT= AT TREATMENT P7ANr NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-37 Board Authorization Date: July 11, 1990 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALXECR TIA IUCIXMEMED BY: nc+nv,n Manager Date ZIEBARTH & ALPER ACCEPTED BY: Y: Date erector of Eng' Bering Date "J-5'" AGENDA ITEM #11(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-5" COLUM SANIITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 0£ 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 RrX AVBNNDE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CAi11aUIIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Two (2) CONTRACIOR: Couch & Sons (JV) DATE July 11, 1990 JOB: North Branch of the Rolling Rills Drive Relief Subtnmk Sewer (and City of Brea Sewer) Contract No. 2-11-3 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (.Deduct.) $ 37,590.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the follaving changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the follvaing additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - REMOVE AND REPLACE SUB3FA➢E APED PAVING AT PARKING LOT STATION NO. 0+00 TO STATION NO. 02+50 The Contractor was directed to remove and replace unstable subgrade material in the parking area at Station No. 0+00 to Station No. 02+50. The excavation for the new sewer line ran through the parking area. The contract documents indicated that the new paving and base would match the existing structural section of the pavement. However, due to the unstable subbase, the specified compaction of the base material could not be accomplished. Also, the existing pavement section consisted of approximately two inches of asphalt on two inches of base. Replacement of the paving as existing could not be done. Additional removal of unsuitable material and replacement with Class II base and asphalt paving were needed to provide specified compaction and a stable area for the paving machine. Alec included is the added cost for a separate move-in for the paving equipment. Normally, all of the paving would be accomplished at one time. However, the County Parks Department and County EMIII directed the Districts to pave this parking area in time for the Snow Feat Celebration. This item was accaplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the Cenral Provisions. ADDED COST TTIIS CRANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 16,526.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 5 Calendar Days Item 2 - UNSUITABLE TTENCH MATERIAL The Contractor encountered unsuitable material for the trench baclmdill consisting of excessively wet unccmpactable clay. This material was encountered all along the alignment of the new sewer line. The Contractor was directed to ,»rove and dispose of the unsuitable backfill material and replace with granular material in accordance with Standard Specifications Section 21-12. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: $ 19,823.00 `.J TIME iXTENSION THIS CRANGE ORDER ITEM: 30 Calendar Days "M-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(n) (1) - DISTRICT 2 "M-1" CO(poly SANI=CN DISTRICTS OF ORAL COUNTY Page 2 of'4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 FELT C AVENUE FIXZWLEN VALLEY, OMUC7R UA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: Colich & Sons (JV) DATE July 11, 1990 JOB: North Branch of the Rolling H. 11s Drive Relief Subtrunk Sewer (arid City of Brea Sewer) Contract No. 2-11-3 Item 3 - CONFLICT WITH EXISTING CONCRETE-ENCASED SEWER LINE The Contractor encountered the existing concrete-encased sewer Line during the boring operations at Station No. 32+20. The existing concrete encasement was discovered to be off the alignment as indicated in the contract drawings. The remainder of the installation of the 36-inch pipe casing had to be hand tunneled per direction from the District's representative. The existing concrete-encased Line extended on through the area of the proposed manhole at Station No. 32+20. It was noted that the encasement had failed upstream of the proposed manhole after the Contractor had begun forming the new manhole base. The Contractor was directed to remove and replace the failed section of the existing line and to reform the new manhole base. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CMQE ORDER ITEM: $ 16,001.00 TIME EX TENSIC N THIS CHAR ORDER ITEM: 10 Calendar Days Item 4 - UNDISCICSED SENER I.mTF. M The Contractor encountered an undisclosed sewer lateral at Station No. 25+90 during the construction of the City of Brea's portion of the project. The Contractor was directed to make the necessary repairs and changes to connect the lateral to the new sewer line. By letter dated may 3, 1990 the City of Brea accepts all costs for the added work involved with reconstructing the Brea manhole, and constructing and connecting the 6-inch 4CP sewer lateral. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General. Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CffWE ORDER ITEM: $ 7,506.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 10 Calendar Days Item 5 - TIME EXTENSION :'he Contractor was delayed in starting the construction after the Notice to Proceed. The County Parka Department and the County EMA world not allcw the Contractor to start work until the Parks representative approved the removal of curtain trees within and along the alignment of the new seer line. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-69(b)(2)A of the General ^ Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: $ 0.00 TINE EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 60 Calendar Days "M-2.. AGENDA ITEM #11(n) (1) - DISTRICT 2 "M-2" COUNTY SANI CN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COWN Page 3 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ECT.Tc AVENUE FOUMDUN VALLEY, alln UUA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Two (2) CONPRACICII2: Couch & Sons (JV) DATE July 11. 1990 JOB: North Branch of the Rollin Hills Drive Relief Subtxunk Sewer (arid City of Brea Sewer) Contract No. 2-11-3 Item 6 - A.SPHAIT REPAIR The Contractor was directed to repair 57,000 square feet of asphalt paving, generally by placing a filter fabric/A.C. overlay in accordance with directions received from Orange County MR. (In total, about 86,000 square feet of Craig Regional Park interior roads were repaired; haever, the remainder was the Contractor's responsibility.) Staff directed the extra repair of the rceds be done to eliminate a potential dispute with the park personnel and to insure the roads adequacy for future m inrenance access by the District. ADDED COST THIS CHANCE CRDER ITEM: $ 27,734.00 TINE EMNSION THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 30 Calendar Days TOML ADDED COST TBIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 87,590.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 145 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time ma by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore unttually agreed that 145 days' extension of tine to perf— the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SON+lJARY OF CONERACT TIME Original Contract Date September 11,1989 Original Contract Time 120 Calendar Days Original Completion Date January 8, 1990 Time Extension this C.O. 145 Calendar Days 4btal Contract Time Extension 160 Calendar Days - Revised Contract Time 280 Calendar Days Revised Final Coupletion Due Date June 17, 1990 Actual Final Completion Date June 17, 1990 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable "M-3" AGENDA ITEM #11(n) (1) - DISTRICT 2 "M-3" COUNTY SAN W=C N DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 0£ 4 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ENT•T.C' AVENUE 1•CUN]MIN VALLEY, ChIZE RKM 92708 CBAN S ORDER C. 0. NO. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: Couch & Sons (JV) MATE July 11, 1990 JOB: North Branch of the Rollins Hills Drive Relief Subtnmk Sewer (and City o£ Brea Sewer) Contract No. 2-11-3 Original Contract Price $ 697,356.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 18.045.00 This Change (Add) (DpduGt-) $ 87,590.00 Amended Contract Price $ 802.991.00 Board Authorization Date: July 11, 1990 COUNTY SANimnmrON DISTRICTS OF ORAL COUNTY, CALIFOEffA )SIDED BY: 6-/f-Po NStagew Date COTSCH & SONS (JV) ACCEPTED BY: BY: GIB L4n' . w f-,(J Contractor Date or of I"ineering Date "M-4" AGENDA ITEM #11(n)(1) - DISTRICT 2 "M-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF CHANCE COUNTY Page 1 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 RLLIS AVENUE FaMMIN VALSEY, alln BNTA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Three (3) CONTRACTOR: Couch & Sons (JV) DATE July 11. 1990 JOB: North Branch of the Rollins Bills Drive Relief Subtrank Sewer (and City of Brea Sewer) Contract No. 2-11-3 Annunt of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) (S 4,126.00) In accordance with cnrtract provisions, the follaaing changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby auth�ed and as ampensation therefor, the follaaing additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANITT:CE.4 ADD: Change in Item Quantity No. Unit Description Fran To Difference A C.Y. Crushed Rock 0 124 124 @ $ 12.00 = $ 1,488.00 B C.Y. Crushed Rock 0 100 100 @ $ 13.70 = 1,370.00 SUBTOTAL $ 2,858.00 DEDUCT: Change in Item Quantity No. Unit Description From To Difference 11 L.F. 12-inch VCP 45 0 45 @ $100.00 = ($ 4,500.00) 15 EA 48-inch M.H. 1 0 1 @ $2800.00 = (2,800.00) SUBTOTAL = ($ 7,300.00) DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($ 4,442.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOM DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: ($ 4,442.00) TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days "N-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(n) (2) - DISTRICT 2 "N-1' OOWrY SAM TAMCN DISTRICTS OF ORANM COLUrY Page 2 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 Er.r.rc AVEM ' FOiIIMUN VALISY, CAlnUN A 92708 CBANM ORDER C. O. NO. Three (3) CONIRA=: Colich & Sons (JV) DATE July 11, 1990 JOB: North Branch of the Rolling pills Drive Relief Subtrvnk Sewer (and City of Brea Sewer) Contract No. 2-11-3 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and a[ry extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is requite for this Change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SU`- PM OF CONTRACT TII+18 Original Contract Date September 11,1989 Original Contract Time 120 Calendar Days Original Ccupleticn, Date January 8, 1990 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 160 Calendar Days Revised Contract Tice 280 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date June 17, 1990 Actual Final Coupled Date Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Doges Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 697,356.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 105,635.00 This Change !Add) (Deduct) $ 14,442.001 Amended Contract Price $ 798,549.00 "N-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(n)(2) - DISTRICT 2 "N-2" COMM SAkIMMTICN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 E'TT.TS AVENUE ETHIISPAIId VALLEY, CALIFMallh 92708 CBANM ORDER C. O. NO. Three (3) CONTRACTOR: Colich & Sons (JV) DATE July 11, 1990 JOB: North Branch of the Rolling Hills Drive Relief Subtrunk Sewer fand City of Brea Sewed Contract No. 2-11-3 Board Authorization Date: July 11, 1990 COMM SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORAL COUNTY, CALnURNIA R) IDED BY: Construction Manager Date CHRISME CORPORATION ACCEPTED HY: HYf Contractor Date reator of Eng1tffiering Date "N-3" AGENDA ITEM #11(n) (2) - DISTRICT 2 "N-3" RESOLUTION NO. 90-83-2 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 2-11-3 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING NORTH BRANCH OF THE ROLLING HILLS DRIVE RELIEF SUBTRUNK SEWER (AND CITY OF BREA SEWER) , CONTRACT NO. 2-11-3, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Colich & Sons (JV) , has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for North Branch of the Rolling Hills Drive Relief Subtrunk Sewer (and City of Brea sewer), Contract No. 2-11-3, on May 15, 1990; and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Director of Engineering has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed In accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That North Branch of the Rolling Hills Drive Relief Subtrunk Sewer (and City of Brea sewer), Contract No. 2-11-3, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated September 11, 1989; and, Section 4. That the Districts' Director of Engineering is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Colich & Sons (JV) setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of North Branch of the Rolling Hills Drive Relief Subtrunk Sewer (and City of Brea sewer) , Contract No. 2-11-3, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel ; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 2 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 11, 1990. "0" AGENDA ITEM #11(n)(3) - DISTRICT 2 110" COUNTY SANITATICN DLSMCTS OF CRAWS COUNTY Page 1 of 3 P. O. PDX 8127 - 10844 Fr.T•TC AV@ID6 FCON= VAIS,HY, CALaUUM 92708 CHANCE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: Couch & Sons (JV) DA3E July 11, 1990 JOB ABAlII WERT OF LANE ROAD PUMP STATICN, CONTRAL•T NO. 7-11-1 AND A WIDONME T OF CAST FROCK AND DOW AVENUE PMP STATIONS AND MODIFICATIONS TO MACARTHUR PLW STATION, CONTRACT NO. 7-11-3 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Dada ) $ 27,913.00 In accordance with attract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Contract No. 7-11-3 Item 1 - REALIGN PROPOSED SEWER AMID MIIiM M'M After excavating to the elevation shown on the contract plans and specifications, the Contractor found that the elevation of the existing inc aming line was not as stated on the Contract drawings, Sheet No. 4 between Station Nos. 0 + 07 and 9 + 85 on Dow Avenue in the City of Tustin. The Contractor was directed to change the elevation of the new sewer line and change the location of the new manholes located at Station Nos. 2 + 51 and 5 + 85, accodi fly to meet the grade of the new sewer line. This readjustment ,used the Contractor additional backfill placement. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,659.00 TIME EX7ENSICN THIS CHANGE ORDER MEM: 3 Calendar Days Item 2 - CHANGED 02MITICIE The Contractor encountered uncaupaCted cobbles within the excavation for the new sewer line. This condition was not shown on the detailed specifications and plans. Cobbles were encountered at Station Nos. 12 + 37 and 12 + 82, from Station No. 14 + 40 to 15 + 25 and from Station Nos. 21 + 80 to 22 + 50 on Dow Avenue in the City of Tustin. (Reference Sheets 5 and 6 of the Contract drawings.) The Contractor was directed to remove the unsuitable cobble material and to replace same with iagxirted coupactable granular material par Standard Specifications, paragraph 16.21-12, trench backfi It and ruction. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER PrEM: $ 21,254.00 TIME EXTEMSICN THIS CHANGE ORDER r M: 3 Calendar Days "P-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(o) - DISTRICT 7 "P-1" 00= Rm*=T':'ATICN DISTRICTS CF ORANGE CCUNTI' Page 2 of 3 P. O. HOX 8127 - 10844 FILTS AVENGE FaVTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORMIIA 92708 �+✓ CHANGE CIDER C. O. NO. One (1) cmmiACm,m Couch & Sons fiv) DATE July 11, 1990 JOB: ABAND@ASE[JP OF LANE ROAD P[IIT STATION, CONTRACT NO. 7-11-1 AND ABANDC1Z= OF CASIERCCX AND DOW AVENGE POND STATIONS AND MODIFICATIONS TO MIIiCARTHUR PUMP STATION, CONPRACP NO. 7-11-3 TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 27,913.00 TOTAL TIME EXIENSICN THIS CHANGE ORDER: 6 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore matually agreed that 6 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential cow, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be i,,.,urred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SU 01AM OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date January 30, 1990 Original Contract Time 120 Calendar Days Original Completion Date May 29, 1990 Time Extension this C.O. 6 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 6 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time Jame 4, 1990 Revised Final Completion Due Date June 4, 1990 Actual Final Coopleti.on Date Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 1,277,212.00 Prev. Ruth. Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (Dad;=L) $ 27,913.00 Amended Contract Price $ 1,305,125.00 "P-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(o) - DISTRICT 7 „P-2^ COUNTY SnpiTe C N DIHIRICTS OF ORANGE CCiIISTY Page 3 of 3 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 RIT.TC AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CBAN(E ORDER C. O. NO. One (1) ccmn PL•iOR: Colich & Sone (JV) DATE July 11, 1990 JOB: ABANDONMENT OF LANE ROAD PU1P STATION, C@NTRPCP NO. 7-11-1 AND ABAXCW4ENI' CF CASTfF4 = AND DOW AVENUE PUMP STATIONS AMID MODIFICATIONS 1O MACARTHUR PUMP STATION, CONTRACT M. 7-11-3 Board Authorization Date: July 11, 1990 COLUN SANPI2NTION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECC109 c, M BY: =aetjce Memeg� nets COLICB & SONS (JV) ACCEPTED BY: APPROVED BY: Contractor Date Director of Engu m ,2ng Date "Pz3" AGENDA ITEM #11(o) - DISTRICT 7 "P-3" RESOLUTION NO. 90-87-7 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRACT NO. 7-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CAMPUS RELIEF SEWER, BETWEEN VON KARMAN AVENUE AND JAMBOREE BOULEVARD, CONTRACT NO. 7-13 WHEREAS, Church Engineering, District's engineer, has completed preparation of the plans and specifications for Campus Relief Sewer, between Von Karman Avenue and Jamboree Boulevard, Contract No. 7-13. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the proposed project is included in Amendment No. 2 to the previously-approved Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewer Facilities to Serve District No. 1, the Northern Half of District No. 6 and District No. 7. The project is to be constructed as per the Master Plan approval . In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and Section 15090 of the Districts' Guidelines, the Final Environmental Impact Report on the Master Plan was approved on April 11, 1984, and the Board of Directors adopted a Negative Declaration re Amendment No. 2 to said Master Plan covering this project on September 12, 1984; and, Section 2. That the project for construction of Campus Relief Sewer, between Von Kansan Avenue and Jamboree Boulevard, Contract No. 7-13, is hereby approved, and that the Secretary be directed to file any documents required by said Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and, Section 3. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents "Q-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(p) - DISTRICT 7 "Q-1" this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Church Engineering, District's engineers, for construction of Campus Relief Sewer, between Von Karman Avenue and Jamboree Boulevard, Contract No. 7-13, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 4. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Public Contracts Code of the State of California; and, Section S. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 6. That the Secretary and the District's Director of Engineering or his designee be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 11, 1990. "Q-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(p) - DISTRICT 7 "0-2" RESOLUTION NO. 90-88-7 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TO ADJUST MANHOLE COVERS ON DISTRICT EWER A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TO ADJUST MANHOLE COVERS AND CLEAN-OUTS ON DISTRICT SEWERS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE COUNTY'S 1989-90 STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM IN UNINCORPORATED COUNTY AREAS WITHIN DISTRICT NO. 7 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Agreement dated July 11, 1990, by and between County Sanitation District No. 7 and the County of Orange, providing for the adjustment of manhole covers and clean-outs on District sewers by the County in conjunction with their 1989-90 street resurfacing program in unincorporated County areas within District No. 7, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for the actual cost of adjusting the manhole covers, plus 10% for inspection and administration costs, not to exceed $220.00, nor be less than $155.00, per manhole for approximately 302 manholes, and for clean-outs, not to exceed $176.00 per clean-out nor be less than $125.00 per clean-out, is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions of said Agreement; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 11, 1990. "R" AGENDA ITEM #11(q) - DISTRICT 7 "R" RESOLUTION NO. 90-89 - ESTABLISHING DISTRICT PROCEDURES FOR SETTLEMENT F WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS MADE AGAINST THE DISTRICTS A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING DISTRICT PROCEDURES FOR SETTLEMENT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS MADE AGAINST THE DISTRICTS WHEREAS, claims for Workers' Compensation damages alleging personal injuries, including death, are periodically made against the Districts; and, WHEREAS, the Districts presently have no Workers' Compensation insurance in force, having previously determined to be legally self-insured; and, WHEREAS, the Districts have retained a claims administration service firm and special legal counsel who shall be vested with certain limited authority to accomplish a favorable disposition of Workers' Compensation claims made against the Districts; and, WHEREAS, cost efficiency relating to resolution of Workers' Compensation claims can be greatly improved by the adoption of certain policies relating to the resolution of said claims. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY DETERMINE, RESOLVE AND ORDER: ARTICLE I SETTLEMENT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS - MADE AGAINST THE DISTRICTS Section 1. A minimum liability reserve has been established in the amount of 5250,000.00 for the payment of claims made against the Districts. Said minimum amount shall continue to be provided for in each annual budget to ensure that sufficient funds are on deposit to provide for payment of those amounts "T-1" AGENDA ITEM #14(b) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "T-1" incurred as a liability loss or expense; and, Section 2. Each annual budget shall provide, in addition to the reserve established by Section 1, for the sufficient funds to provide a sufficient balance to meet projected expenses for payment of claims during the ensuing fiscal year; and, Section 3. A claims administration firm is authorized to be retained, and said firm is hereby granted authorization to make payments and settlements of claims made against the Districts in an amount not to exceed $1,000.00 per claimant. Said firm shall be retained in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in an agreement approved by the General Counsel ; and, Section 4. In addition to special legal counsel selected by the Districts' Workers' Compensation administrator, the General Counsel is authorized to retain the services of special legal counsel for purposes of representing the Districts in the defense of any Workers' Compensation claim, wherein he determines that specialized expertise is desirable or that the workload requires the utilization of outside counsel ; and, Section 5. A committee comprised of the General Manager, Director of Finance and General Counsel are authorized to review and make full settlement of any Workers' Compensation claim made against the Districts by payment of a sum not to exceed $10,000.00 per claimant. In the event a claim results in litigation, which is being legally defended by other than the Districts' General Counsel , this committee shall review and provide the approval to the Districts' special legal counsel within the same limits; and, Section 6. All claims resulting in a recommended settlement by negotiation or stipulation in an amount exceeding $10,000.00 per claimant shall be submitted to and approved by the joint Boards or Directors; and, Section 7. This resolution is effective immediately upon adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 11, 1990. "T-2" AGENDA ITEM #14(b) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "T-2" RESOLUTION NO. ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1 0-91 FOR THE DIST ICT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF DIVIS fF F TITLE 1 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMEN77009 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 FOR THE DISTRICT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PRO ISIr� OF DIVISION 9 OF TITLE 1 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE WHEREAS, Article XIII B of the Constitution of the State of California as proposed by the Initiative Measure approved by the people at the special statewide election held on November 6, 1979, provides that the total annual appropriations subject to limitation of each local government shall not exceed the appropriations limit of such entity for the prior year adjusted for changes in the cost of living and population except as otherwise specifically provided for in said Article; and, WHEREAS, the State Legislature added Division 9 (commencing with Section 7900) to Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California to implement Article XIII B of the California Constitution; and, WHEREAS, Section 7910 of the Government Code provides that each year the governing body of each local jurisdiction shall , by resolution, establish its appropriations limit for the following fiscal year pursuant to Article XIII B at a regularly-scheduled meeting or a noticed special meeting and that fifteen (15) days prior to such meeting, documentation used in the determination of the appropriations limit shall be available to the public; and, WHEREAS, Section 7902 (a) o* the Government Code sets forth the method for determining the appropriatiohs limit for each local jurisdiction for the 1990-91 fiscal year; and, "U-1" AGENDA ITEM #14(b) (4) (k) - DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5.6,7&11 "U-1" ' WHEREAS, the Board of Directors wish to establish the appropriations limit for fiscal year 1990-91 for the District. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER: Section 1: That it is hereby found and determined that the documentation used in the determination of the appropriations limit for County Sanitation District No. of Orange County, California, for fiscal year 1990-91, was available to the public in the Finance Department of said District at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date. Section 2: That the appropriations limit for fiscal year 1990-91 for County Sanitation District No._ of Orange County, California, as established in accordance with Section 7902(a) of the California Government Code is $ which sum is within the maximum authorized spending limitation for fiscal year 1990-91. Section 3: The determination of the appropriation limit is based upon the best and most complete information available at this time. The District reserves the right to review and re-establish a new and different limit in the event that it subsequently determines that a modification of the limitation amount is appropriate. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 11, 1990. "U-2" AGENDA ITEM #14(b) (4) (k) - DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7&11 "U-2" RESOLUTION NO. 90- < AUTHORIZING THE REIMBURSEMENT OF FUNDS ADVANCED .� FROM RESERVES BY DISTRI T F R API AL FACILITIE PROJECTS FROM PROCEEDS OF INDEBTEDNESS IS TU ES A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DISTRICT TO REIMBURSE ITS CAPITAL FUND RESERVES FROM THE PROCEEDS OF APPROVED INDEBTEDNESS ISSUES FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF ANY CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECTS IDENTIFIED IN THE 1989 MASTER PLAN OF FACILITIES • f ! ! Y f ! X f R w k f k 3 ! WHEREAS, on July 19, 1989, the Board of Directors of District No. together with the Boards of Directors of all other Districts of the Joint Administrative Organization, approved and adopted a Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, including a Financial Plan; and, WHEREAS, said Master Plan identified numerous Capital Facilities Projects to be designed and constructed over a period of 30 years, the financing for which would be obtained through the issuance of certain long-term indebtedness; and, WHEREAS, subsequent to the approval of said Capital Facilities Master Plan, the Districts have been undertaking detailed studies to complete the program of issuance of long-term indebtedness; and, WHEREAS, during the course of the studies for obtaining the required financing, the District has undertaken the design and construction of certain of the Capital Facilities Projects identified in the Master Plan, so as to avoid undue delay in the completion of necessary facilities; and, WHEREAS, payment for the design and construction has been made with funds held in the Capital Reserve Funds of the District; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the adoption of said Master Plan, the Board of Directors has deemed it appropriate that the cost of the design and construction of the Master Plan Capital Facilities should be funded through the use of the long-term debt issuance proceeds; and, "V-1" AGENDA ITEM #15 - DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7&11 "V 1" WHEREAS, the Board of Directors intends to reimburse the District's Capital Reserve and other currently available Funds for those expenditures which have been or will be made from said Funds, pending the completion of the long-term financing program. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That expenditures made by or on behalf of the District subsequent to the adoption of the Master Plan, with respect to Master Plan Capital Facilities Projects, including engineering design, are to be financed with the proceeds received by the District from long-term tax-exempt financing. Section 2: Expenditures made on an interim basis from currently available funds by or on behalf of the District with respect to such capital costs, prior to the consummation of such long-term financing, are, to the fullest extent possible, to be reimbursed to the District from the proceeds of such long-term financing upon its consummation. Section 3: The foregoing represents the current intention of the District, but does not in any way obligate the District to proceed with long-term financing for capital costs or to reimburse itself from the proceeds of any such long-term financing which may be undertaken in the event the District later determines that either of such actions is not in the best interests of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 11, 1990. "V-2" AGENDA ITEM #15 - DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,F,7U 1 "V-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 2 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: KENKO, INC., dba MC GRAND & ASSOCIATES DATE Jul 11 1990 JOB: Improvements to Baysi a rive run ewer, ase , Contract No. - - Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduet) $ 495,775.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 INSTALLATION OF 36-INCH VCP UNDER PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY Install 36-inch VCP sewer line under Pacific Coast Highway at Bayside Drive in accordance with plans, staff direction and a Mobil Oil Company directed safety plan. Costs, listed below, are for completed work. Additional costs for non-completed items will follow. A. Jack 90 feet of 3/4-inch x 66-inch steel casing, install and operate dewatering wells, install 36-inch VCP sewer, grout build 84-inch internal diameter manhole, 15 feet of 21-inch VCP connector pipe, and 72-inch internal diameter manhole $ 275,000.00 B. Additional costs maintained incurred for safety training, extra contaminated dewatering changes and project delays $ 102,200.00 C. Construction of 51 linear feet of 36-inch VCP at $225/foot (bid price under Contract No. 5-34-2) $ 11,475.00 TOTAL $ 388,675.00 ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 388,675.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 RELOCATION OF TWO CITY WATERLINES AT BAYSIDE DRIVE AND JAMBOREE ROAD The Contractor is directed to relocate City of Newport Beach 18-inch and 24-inch waterlines. Casts herein include subcontractor costs for material and labor (potholing/exploratory costs and possible overtime changes are not included). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 107,100.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Drys TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 495,775.00 .� TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days "W-1" AGENDA ITEM #28(b) - DISTRICT 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 2 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR, KENKO INC. dba MC GRAND & ASSOCIATES DA u 990 JOB: Improvements to ays a rive run ewer, Phase Contract The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date February 21, 1990 Original Contract Time 210 Calendar Days Original Completion Date September 18, 1990 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 210 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date September 18, 1990 Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 1,959,"0.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $•b'60 This Change (Add) (Dedee%) $ 775.00— Amended Contract Price $ ,455,465.00 Board Authorization Date: July 11, 1990 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECOM VENDED,,BBYpY:,�;; onstruction manager a e KENKO INC., dba MC GRAND & ASSOCIATES ACCEPTED BY: Zc'cor VE :BY: ontracto� ate of Engineering ate "W-2" AGENDA ITEM #28(b) - DISTRICT 5 "W-2" RESOLUTION NO. 90-85-5 APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF ORANGE FOR SUBORDINATION OF DISTRICT'S EASEMENT RIGHTS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF ORANGE FOR SUBORDINATION OF DISTRICT'S EASEMENT RIGHTS WHEREAS, the District has undertaken necessary engineering studies and determined to construct a trunk Sewer system described as the Downcoast Sewer from Corona del Mar to Los Trancos to serve the Newport Coast Project of Coastal Community Builders; and, WHEREAS, the design includes an alignment and placement of said sewer within the right-of-way for Pacific Coast Highway, a State of California public highway) and, WHEREAS, the District has previously received a Grant of Easement from The Irvine Company, granting to the District a 14- foot easement for the installation, operation and continued future maintenance of said sewer line; and, WHEREAS, Coastal Community Builders has received approval from the County of Orange for Tentative Tract Map No. 14131, which includes a condition that the developer is not to grant any easements to any other person or agency within areas requiring dedication to the County of Orange; and, WHEREAS, the development of the subdivision includes a requirement to improve Pacific Coast Highway and the dedication of rights-of-way to the county of orange and/or the State of California/Caltrans, which area of dedication includes that land which has been previously a subject of a Grant of Easement to 11Y-1" AGENDA ITEM #29(c) - DISTRICT 5 "Y-1" District for sewer line purposes; and, �./ WHEREAS, District has received a request from the County of orange and Coastal community Builders to subordinate its interest for the underground sewer to that of the County for purposes of the public street right-of-way; and, WHEREAS, the District has reviewed the request, together with the needs of the District, and has determined that its interest would not be prejudiced nor the utilization of the easement adversely impacted by such a subordination. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of orange County, California, DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND ORDERI ssnction 1: That certain Subordination Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is hereby approved. Section . 2 : The Chairman and Board Secretary are hereby authorized to execute all necessary agreements and documents and cause them to be recorded in the Official Records of the County of orange, as required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors held this 11th day of July , 1990. TLW:pj (B23) `r "Y-2" AGENDA ITEM #29(c) - DISTRICT 5 "Y-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 39 5, 69 79 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON JUNE 139 1990 PNITAiION 1�µ.P°floe O°OiP'D r U aS JNA1 I � m ORgNGE1COVN` x ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA �.r ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held an June 13, 1990, at 7:30 p.m., to the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: x James A. Wahner, Chairman Orma Crank =Charles E. Puckett, Chairman pro tan Richard B. Edgar !—Dan Griset —Dan Young =Roger Stanton _Dan R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 2: x Iry Pickler, Chat roan _Fred Hunter x James Neal, Chat roan pro test George Scott Roland E. Bigonger x Henry W. Wades x A.S. -Buck- Catlin _Chris Worthy =Dan Griset _Dan Young x William D. Mahoney _Beth Graham =Robert H. Main Norman Culver a Carrey Nelson —_Wayne Wedin x Arthur G. Newton _Norman Z. Eckenrode —Wayne Silzel Harold Saldarini =Don E. Smith —_Fred Barrera ' x Rager Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 3: x Richard Polls, Chat rnan _Eva G. Miner =J.R. -Bob' Siefen, Chairman pro test Dewey Wiles xMargaret M. Arnold —_Cecilia L. Age =Wes Bannister Peter Green x A.B. -Buck- Catlin —Chris Norby x Norman Culver _Robert H. Main x Beth Graham _William D. Mahoney =Dan R. Griffin Donna L. Chessen =Dan Griset —Dan Young x James Neal —George Scott a Carrey Nelson =Wayne Wedin =Iry Pickler Fred Hunter 7--Roger Stanton —_Don R. Rath =Charles Sylvia Robert Wahlstrmn —Paul Verellen =Edward L. Allen =Edna Wilson Frank Laszlo DISTRICT NO. 5: x Evelyn Hart, Chat roan _Ruthelyn Plunder =Phil Sansone, Chairman pro tan John C. Cox, Jr. =Don R. Rath _Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 6: x Ruthelyn Plumper, Chatrnan Evelyn Hart =James Wahner, Chat rnan pro test —James M. Ferryman =Don R. Roth —Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 7: a Don E. Smith, Chat rman Fred Barrera =Richard Edgar, Chairman pro tam —_ mpCharles E. Puckett =John C. Cox, Jr. _Ruthelyn Pluer =Dan Griset Dan Young =Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton 7--Sally Anne Sheridan Larry Agran =James Wahner _Harry Green DISTRICT NO. 11: x Grace Winchell, Chairman Peter Green na=Tom Mays, Chairn pro ten —Jim Silva _L__Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 13: x Henry W. Wades, Chairman Roland E. Bigonger a Wayne Wedin, Chairman pro tem —Carrey Nelson =Iry Pickler Fred Hunter z Don R. Roth —Roger Stanton 7--Don E. Smith Fred Barrera DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chairman Darryl Miller =Sally Anne Sheridan, Chat man pro tem _Larry Agran =Leslie A. Pontious Richard B. Edgar =Don R. Roth —Roger Stanton =Don E. Smith Fred Barrera -2- 06/13/90 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita J. Brown, Board Secretary, Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Corinne Clawson, Ed Hodges, Penny Kyle, John Linder, Charles Nichols, Adriana Renescu OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel , Clark Ide, Walt Howard, Bill Knopf, Jamel Demir, Phil Stone, Tan Richardson, Bernard Maniscaico Y Y Y Y t Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file minute excerpt from the Seal Beach re That the minute excerpt from the City Boar appointments of Seal Beach re election of mayor and appointment of alternate Director and seating a new member of the Board, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows: (*Mayor) District Active Director Alternate Director 3 Edna Wilson* Frank Laszlo ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman recognized Presentation of SCAOMD 1990 Clean Director/District 13 Chairman Henry Air Award to 0050 Wedaa, who is also a member of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Board and is currently its Vice Chairman. Mr. Wedaa commented that he had been associated with the Sanitation Districts for many years and that he was very proud of their accomplishments and their positive approach to environmental management. Representing the SCAQMD, he then briefly explained their Clean Air Awards program which was first instituted in 1989. This year awards were given in five categories. The Orange County Sanitation Districts' application was one of 65 in the category of Model Community Achievements which recognizes exceptional efforts in promoting good air Quality. He noted that the Sanitation Districts were the recipients of one of only two awards given in this category for 1990. Director Wedaa further reported on the accomplishments of the Districts which resulted in achieving this Clean Air Award. In 1984 the Districts began installing launder valves in Orange County sewage handling facilities, reducing hydrogen sulfide emissions by 48%. The Districts are currently constructing power facilities at treatment plants to generate on-site , electrical power from digester gas by 1992. This innovation alone will reduce NOx and CO2 emissions by 57%. In addition, the Districts embarked an an air tox ics study unparalleled in the wastewater field. The Sanitation Districts of Orange County have also been a driving force and leader in establis�ing conformity review procedures to be used throughout the industry. -3- �,rJ 06/13/90 Mr. Wedaa then presented the 1990 Clean Air Award to the Joint Chairman, Buck Catlin, and General Manager, Wayne Sylvester. Joint Chairman Catlin accepted the award on behalf of the Districts and expressed appreciation for this recognition. He noted that the Districts voluntarily instituted these air quality programs, and remarked that he was proud of the innovative leadership of the Directors and staff. ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Catlin reported that Report of the Joint Chairman the Fiscal Policy Committee was tentatively scheduled to meet on Wednesday, June 20th, at 5:30 p.m. (This meeting was subsequently changed to Friday, June 22nd, at 4:00 p.m.) He also noted that the Selection Committee for Districts 3 and 11 was scheduled to meet on Thursday, June 21st, at 5:30 p.m. Chairman Catlin then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, June 27th, at 5:30 p.m., and invited Directors Leslie Pontious and Charles Puckett to attend and participate in the discussions. The Joint Chairman also advised that the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee was scheduled to meet on Thursday, June 28th, at 5:30 p.m. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager commented briefly Report of the General Manager on the annual budget process for the benefit of new Directors. He explained that later in the agenda they would be asked to consider the Joint Works budgets for 1990-91. These budgets fund the construction and operation of the treatment plants and administrative activities of the joint Districts. They have been developed over the past four months with the Boards' Fiscal Policy Committee, and reviewed with the Executive Committee last month. Mr. Sylvester advised that if they are approved that evening, the staff will then incorporate these Joint Works items into the individual budgets of each District to be reviewed by the Executive Committee later in the month. Each District will consider its individual budget for 1990-91 at the July Board meeting. The nine District budgets will then constitute the official budgets of the Districts filed with the County Auditor in August of this year. ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel briefly commented Report of the General counseF on the report included in the Directors' meeting folders on the status of litigation against Southern California Gas Company for recovery of additional costs incurred by District No. 2 as a result of undisclosed Gas Company utilities encountered during construction of the Taft Interceptor, Contract No. 2-6-2. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or ApprovaT of minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 9, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 9, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -4- 06/13/90 DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 9, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or pproval of minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 9, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 9, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 9, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or - Approval of minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 9, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or pproval of minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 9, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 9, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint antl incividual District Cialms That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "8" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 5/09190 5/23/90 ALL DISTRICTS o perating Fund - $ 399,974.42 $1,014,210.78 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 9,572,462.48 2,496,520.54 Joint Working Capital Fund - 384,149.04 179,126.23 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 12,417.85 119,862.03 DISTRICT NO. 1 - -0- 343.00 DI TRI N - 628,461.28 1,269,102.58 RI N0. - 16,975.22 73,910.10 DISTAL-S - 823,807.34 61,196.75 II Rb - 1,175.25 257.21 DDUTRR ff N0:7 - 398,683.76 382,589.43 M3TWTU N0.71 - 369.27 8,460.43 I R N .T3 - -0- 38.00 UMUCT-00-77 - 451,350.10 6,29041 Off N . 5 8 6 JOINT - 66,689.26 2,167:64 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & TWUNT. - 2,045.60 -0- DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 MOM - 9.14 769.40 TIT 758, 1 .5614, -5- 06/13/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: warding Purc as2 Of ne Il ntluctive� ou led asma ssion That the bid tabulation and ectrometer, ecificat on recommendation re award of Purchase No. E-190, to Leco corporation of One (1) Inductively Coupled Plasma Emission Spectrometer, Specification No. E-190, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the bid of Leeman Labs, Inc. be, and is hereby, rejected as it does not meet the specifications; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Leco Corporation for the delivered price of $122,000.00 plus sales tax for Alternate Bid Item B. ALL DISTRICTS In response to an inquiry relative to Approving Chan e Order No. 17 to Change Order No. 17 to Job No. J-7-4, the tans and s ecif cations for the Director of Engineering reported Job No. J_ - that these changes are for corrections to the plans which should have been included in the original design. He noted that although the project was issued building permits, the Districts have encountered considerable difficulty with the architectural design of this project. Mr. Dawes indicated that staff and General Counsel are now reviewing appropriate measures to resolve the issues. Changes to the fire alarm system and sprinkling system required by the City of Fountain Valley Fire Marshall were also discussed. The Board members entered into a discussion concerning the architect's responsibilities and liability, and appropriate actions that should be taken. The Boards' Building Committee has held one meeting on this matter and will be meeting again in the near future to further review it. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 17 to the plans and specifications for Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4, authorizing an addition of $21,626.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for four items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That following further review and analysis of the matter, the General Counsel and staff report back to the Directors on the issue. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin Change Order No. 1 to the Tans and s ecif cations for That Change Order No. 1 to the plans Job No. J-17 and specifications for Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17, authorizing a net addition of $22,378.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for five items of additional work or deletions, and granting a time extension of seven calendar days for completion of said changes, be, and is hereby, approved. `./ -6- 06/13/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the electrical equipment purchase That Change Order No. 1 to the contract with Cooper Indus n es, electrical equipment purchase Job No. J-19A contract with Cooper Industries, Energy Services Group, dba C-B Reciprocating, for Purchase of Spark-Ignited Engines for Use in Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19A, authorizing an additional $10,000.00 to upgrade all eight engines with new computer controls, increasing the contract amount from $20,658,245.00 to an amount not to exceed $20,668,245.00; extending the date for delivery of the heat recovery equipment from June 30, 1990 to September 1, 1990; and extending the date for delivery of spare parts from June 4, 1990 to August 1, 1990, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: REMChan a Order No. to the lams and s ec fications for That Change Order No. 5 to the plans Job No. J-ZU and specifications for Warehouse and Maintenance Building and Oil Storage and Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20, authorizing a net addition of $16,528.34 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for six items of additional work or deletions, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizin staff to issue ham e Order No. 1 to Purchase rder That staff be, and is hereby, No. 37965 issued to Sur-Lite authorized to issue Change Order Corporation re Job No. J-21A No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 37965 Issued to Sur-Lite Corporation for Purchase of Five Waste Digester Gas Flares, Job No. J-21A, decreasing the number of waste gas flares purchased from five to four, and the total authorized amount from $284,216.00 to $239,400.00, plus sales tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 29 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 29 to the plans Job Nos. P1-20 and P1-31 and specifications for Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20, and Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts; and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31, authorizing an addition of $130,821.95 to the contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. for 13 items of miscellaneous modifications and additions, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Chanqe Order No. 1 to the tans and s ecifications for That Change Order No. 1 to the plans Job No. PI- 4-2 and specifications for Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-2, authorizing an addition of $104,883.45 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. , for one item of additional work to accommodate Southern California Edison Company and City of Huntington Beach improvements, be, and is hereby, approved. -7- 06/13/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 2 to the �../ plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 2 to the pions Jab No. P1-34-2 and specification for Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-2, authorizing an addition of $132,628.20 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. , for one item of additional work for compatibility with new Central Power Generation Systems project, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, secondecland duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 8 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 8 to the plans Jab No. P2-37 and specifications for Miscellaneous Modifications and Improvements to Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-37, authorizing an addition of $29,190.00 to the contract with Ziebarth & Alper for ten items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the 5election Committee to negotiate Adtlentlum No. 3 to the That the Selection Committee be, and Professional Services Agreement is hereby, authorized to negotiate with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers Addendum No. 3 to the Professional for design and construction services Services Agreement with Lee and Ro re Job No. P1-33 Consulting Engineers for design and construction services required for Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33, to provide for additional construction support services. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Professional Services Agreement Enwith James M. Montgomery That the Selection Committee Consulting gineers, Inc. to certification of the final negotiated conduct a study of user categories fee relative to the Professional for establishing rates for Services Agreement with Districts' one-time connection fees James M. Montgomery Consulting and annual use fees - Engineers, Inc. to conduct a study of user categories for establishing rates for Districts' one-time connection fees and annual use fees, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-54, approving said agreement with James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers, Inc. for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $89,549.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. 8- O6/13/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approv ng Adtlentlum a. 1 to the P rofessiona Services Agreement That the Selection Committee WIlh artin Kordic r. for certification of the final negotiated specialized construction nspec on fee relative to Addendum No. 1 to the services re various master-5 aster- anned Professional Services Agreement with cons rucUion projects Martin Kordick, Sr. for specialized construction inspection services re various master-planned construction projects, providing for extension of said agreement and increasing the hourly rate, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-55, approving said, Addendum No. 1 with Martin Kerdick, Sr. , extending said agreement for construction inspection services, on an as-needed basis, for a two-year period beginning August 10, 1990, at the increased hourly rate of $40.00 for the first year and $42.50 for the second year, plus mileage reimbursement for on-the-job travel . Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: _ Receive file and deny claim of Emmanuel ujo That the claim of Emmanuel Ojo dated April 30, 1990, in the amount of $553.32 for alleged damage to his vehicle while parked on the perimeter road next to the Santa Ana River at Plant No. 1, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the Districts' General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that Authorizing the General Manager to recently the Operations Division has empioy Dr. Y. J, bnao in the experienced a considerable turnover classification of 5enior n ineer of senior engineering staff and has at the salary of 77 month been recruiting to fill several positions. The field of applicants was narrowed to two for a Senior Engineer position. The first one declined the position and the second one, Dr. Shao, comes highly qualified by virtue of his schooling and 23 years of experience, 12 of which are in the wastewater treatment field. Mr. Sylvester explained that he is currently making more than staff is authorized to offer, which is the mid-point of the salary range. He explained that staff is requesting authority to employ Dr. Shao at the top step of the salary range for the classification of Senior Engineer. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to employ Dr. Y. J. Shao in the classification of Senior Engineer, at the salary of $5377/month, to work in the Districts' Operations Division. -9- �../ 06/13/90 ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager explained that Author zin the Genera ana er o the Boards have previously adopted des note members of the oar s separate policies for Directors and and/or staff to art an pa rtici- staff for reimbursement of travel and �.r ate in meetin s, hearin s meeting expenses. Annually an item con erences, faci li y inspections is placed on the agenda to authorize and other functions him to designate members of the Boards and/or staff to attend meetings, conferences, legislative and regulatory proceedings and other similar functions. Such attendance is in accordance with the Districts' adopted policies for travel and expense reimbursement and the approved annual budget. He noted that the gross annual Joint Operating budget for 1990-91 of approximately $50 million includes a travel and meeting allowance of $175,000. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to designate members of the Boards and/or staff to attend and participate in meetings, hearings, conferences facility inspections and other functions which, in his opinion, will be of value to the Districts or affect the Districts' interests, including, but not limited to, those conducted by state and federal legislative and regulatory bodies and the California Association of Sanitation Agencies, California Water Pollution Control Association, Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, and the Water Pollution Control Federation; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for travel , meals, lodging and incidental expenses be, and is hereby, authorized in accordance with existing Districts' policies and the approved annual budget for 1990-91. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Annual nomination for Chairman of the Joint Administrative The General Counsel briefly reviewed Organization the provisions of the Districts' Rules of Procedure relating to nomination and election of the Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman. This being the annual meeting fixed by the Boards at which nominations are to be made for the office of Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization, the Secretary then declared the nominations open. Director A. B. "Buckn Catlin was nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. It was pointed out that nominations would remain open until the regular July Board meeting. The Secretary then reported that the election would be held at said July meeting in accordance with the Boards' Rules of Procedures for the Conduct of Business of the Districts. Nominations and election of a Vice Joint Chairman will also be held at the regular July meeting. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive f le and a rove staff Sumnar nancial Re ort Far nine- list the staff Summary Financial \..' month period ending March 31, 1990 Report for nine-month period ending March 31, 1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. -10- 06/13/90 ALL DISTRICTS Actions re NPDES Ocean Monitoring Program Receive, file and approve Report Moved, seconded and duly carried: �✓ and Recommendation for NPDES Ocean monitoring Program Year Six That the Report and Recommendation 1990-91 and Selection Committee for NPDES Ocean Monitoring Program Certification re Amendment No. 7 Year Six (1990-91) and Selection to Agreement with SAIC re Committee certification of the Specifics-032 negotiated fee for Amendment No. 7 to Agreement with Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall , Specification No. S-032, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. Approving Amendment No. 7 t0 the Moved, seconded and duly carried: em e Agrent with SAIC re Specification No. 5-032 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-56, approving Amendment No. 7 to the Agreement with SAIC for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-Inch Ocean Outfall , Specification No. S-032, extending the contract from July 1, 1990 to June 30, 1991, for an amount not to exceed $1,821,365.00 for the sixth year of said contract. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file antl approve written report Of the Conservation, That the written report of the Reclamation and Reuse Committee Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee' s meeting On May 31, 1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the General Manager and General Counsel to negotiate with That the General Manager and General property owners for acquisition of Counsel be, and are hereby, sites for water reclamation authorized to negotiate with property facility in vicinity of Anaheim owners for acquisition of a site or Forebay sites for a water reclamation facility in the general vicinity of the Anaheim Forebay based upon appraisals for such property. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file antl dpp rove written report of the Executive Committee That the written report of the joint and Fiscal Policy Committee meeting of the Executive Committee and - the Fiscal Policy Committee held on May 23, 1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Report of the Executive Committee and Fiscal That the report and recommendations of PcT—ity Committee re 1990-91 the Executive Committee and Fiscal personnel requirements and joint Policy Committee re 1990-91 personnel dad works budgets requirements and joint works operating and construction budgets, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. -11- 06/13/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving 1 9 - 1 personnel requirements and amending That the 1990-91 personnel classification and com ensation requirements be, and are hereby, Resolution No. 79-2 , as amende approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-57, amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, re 1990-91 personnel requirements. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried by Approving the 199 -91 Joint the following roll call vote: Operating Budget AYES: Edward L. Allen, Margaret M. Arnold, Wes Bannister, A. B. "Buck" Catlin, John C. Cox, Jr., Norman E. Culver, Richard B. Edgar, Beth Graham, Don R. Griffin, Dan Griset, Evelyn Hart, William D. Mahoney, Robert H. Main, James Neal , Arthur G. Newton, Iry Pickler, Ruthelyn Plummer, Richard T. Polis, Leslie A. Pontious, Charles E. Puckett, Don R. Roth, Sally Anne Sheridan, Wayne Silzel , Roger R. Stanton, Peer A. Swan, Charles E. Sylvia, James A. Wanner, Henry W. Medea, Edna Wilson, Grace H. Winchell NOES: None ABSENT: Tom Mays, Carrey J. Nelson, J. R. "Bob" Siefen, Don E. Smith, Wayne 0. Wedin That the proposed 1990-91 Joint Operating Budget Funds of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 for the 1990-91 fiscal year, be, and are hereby, approved and adopted as follows: Fund Total Amount Joint Operating/Working Capital $50,207,000 Workers' Compensation Self-Insured 218,000 Self-Funded Health Plan Trust 1,264,000 Public Liability Self-Insured 329,000 -12- 06/13/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried by Anorovina the 0- 1 Caoital the following roll call vote: outlay Revolving Fund Budge AYES: Edward L. Allen, Margaret M. Arnold, Wes Bannister, A. B. "Buck" Catlin, John C. Cox, Jr. , Norman E. Culver, Richard B. Edgar, Beth Graham, Dan R. Griffin, Dan Griset, Evelyn Hart, William D. Mahoney, Robert H. Main, James Neal , Arthur G. Newton, Iry Pickler, Ruthelyn Plummer, Richard T. Polls, Leslie A. Pontious, Charles E. Puckett, Don R. Roth, Sally Anne Sheridan, Wayne Silzel , Roger R. Stanton, Peer A. Swan, Charles E. Sylvia, James A. Wahner, Henry W. Wedaa, Edna Wilson, Grace H. Winchell NOES: None ABSENT: Tom Mays, Carrey J. Nelson, J. R. "Bob" Siefen, Don E. Smith, Wayne D. Wedin That the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget (CORF Joint Works Construction) of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, be, and is hereby, approved and adopted in the total amount of $103,422,000.00. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizinq the F1sca Policy omm t ee to evaluate proposals That the Fiscal Policy Committee be, and to lace Excess workers, and is hereby, authorized and directed om ensat on insurance coverage to evaluate proposals obtained by the effective July 1, lublu Districts' insurance broker and to place Excess Workers' Compensation Insurance coverage effective July 1, 1990; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said action shall be submitted to the Joint Boards for ratification or revision at the regular meeting on July 11, 1990. ALL DISTRICTS Supervisor Roth and Supervisor A rov nProfessionalServices Stanton expressed their opposition to A reemen with John Carollo the proposal to engage a consultant Engineers to conduct a Toul a r to conduct a foul air treatment treatment optimization study optimization study. In response to an inquiry from other Directors about the reason for his opposition, Supervisor Roth stated that he was opposed to spending this money for a consultant to interpret South Coast Air Quality Management District rules. He stated his belief that the rulemakers should interpret their own rules rather than passing the costs on to the Districts' ratepayers. Director Winchell then spoke in favor of the proposal stating that the agreement with John Carollo Engineers was not solely for clarification of SCAQMD rules, but to determine the best use of the Districts' technology and to establish the standards to be used in the future for these rules and operational activities. It was then moved, seconnad and duly carried: -13- O6/13/90 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-58, approving Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers to conduct a foul air treatment optimization study, on an hourly-rate basis for labor `../ plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $85,000.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Directors Wes Bannister, Richard T. Polis, Don R. Roth, Wayne Silzel and Roger R. Stanton asked that their votes in opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: XUR on zin the Director of Finance to cert f claims and forward to That the Director of Finance be, and County Auditor tor payment is hereby, authorized to certify claims and forward to the Orange County auditor for immediate payment for expenditures incurred after June 30, 1990, and that he declare that such certification shall comply with the provisions of Resolution No. 76-10 pertaining to procedures for payment of claims against the Districts until the 1990-91 budgets are adopted by the respective Districts. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and a rove ro osal of onnenschein, Nath & Rosenthal , That the proposal of Sonnenschein, Attorneys At Law re continuation of Nath & Rosenthal , Attorneys At Law, services of Mr. Lee Pa erson, Esq. dated June 6, 1990, for continuation of services of Mr. Lee Paterson, Esq. , now associated with said firm, as special labor counsel for the Districts, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re u lemental A enda ems relative to Summons and Complaints received subsequent to the agenda being pasted re Job Nos. 0 -7-4 and J-20 Verbal report of General Counsel The General Counsel reported that the Districts had been served with two Summons and Complaints, subsequent to the agenda being posted, involving subcontractors who had filed Stop Notices against the Districts' general contractor, J. R. Roberts Corp. , in connection with Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4, and Warehouse and Maintenance Building and Oil Storange and Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20. Because he was required to respond to said lawsuits prior to the July Board meeting, the General Counsel advised that it would be necessary for the Boards to consider these matters that evening. Mr. Woodruff noted that while the Districts are named in these cases, he would endeavor to not actively participate and, if need be, will simply deposit the funds retained by the Districts' from the Contractor's progress payments into court to allow the contractor and the claimants to resolve their disputes. -14- 06/13/90 The General Counsel pointed out that because these proposed Supplemental Agenda items were unable to be posted 72 hours prior to the meeting, the Boards must vote on whether the matter should be considered prior to actually voting on the recommended actions. He noted that the decision by the Boards to consider these matters must be approved by a two-thirds vote of those present. Authorizing consideration of Moved, seconded and unanimously u lementa en a ems re a ve carried: o receiving and filing Summons an Complaints--The Burke Company vs. That the Boards of Directors do DSP ConstructorsInc,, et al . hereby authorize consideration of ase No. 29329re ob o. J-7-4 supplemental agenda items and La orers ea th an a fare relative to a Summons and Fund for Southern California vs. Complaint for Enforcement of CSDOC. at al . Case No. 162600. re Public Work Stop Notices; Job No. J-ZU Enforcement of Public Work Payment Bond, and Amendments to said Complaint, The Burke Company vs. DSP Constructors, Inc., at al. , Orange County Superior Court Case No. 625326, relative to a previous Stop Notice filed in connection with Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4; and a Summons and Complaint to Foreclose Stop Notice and Against Payment Bond, Laborers' Health and Welfare Fund for Southern California, at al. vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, et al., Orange County Municipal Court-West Judicial District Case No. 162600, relative to a previous Stop Notice filed in connection with Warehouse and Maintenance Building and Oil Storage and Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20, which were not posted 72 hours prior to the Board meeting date because the need to take said actions arose subsequent to the agenda being posted; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Counsel 's Memoranda relative to said Supplemental Agenda items, dated June 5, 1990 and June 13, 1990, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file Summons and Moved, seconded and duly carried: omp aint for Enforcement of Public Work Sto Notices• Enforcement of That the Summons and Complaint Public Work Payment Bond. and for Enforcement of Public Work Amendments to said Com aint he Stop Notices; Enforcement of ur a om an vs. onstruc ors Public Work Payment Band, and ran a (;ounty Superior Amendments to said Complaint, The Court uase NO. UUZ5, re Stop 5top Burke Company vs. DSP Notice filed on Job No. J-7-4 Constructors, Inc. , at al. , Orange County Superior Court Case No. 625326, relative to a previous Stop Notice filed in connection with Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. -15- O6/13/90 Receive and file Summons and Moved, seconded and duly carried: Complaint to Foreclose Stop Notice and A ai nst Pa ent Bontl Laborers' That the Summons and Complaint to Health and Welfare Fund for Southern Foreclose Stop Notice and Against California, et al. vs. County Payment Bond, Laborers' Health Sanitation Districts of Oran a and Welfare Fund for Southern County, et al ., Orange ounty California, et al. vs. County municipal Court-West Judicial Sanitation Districts of Orange District Case No. 16 600 re to County, et al ., Orange County o ice filed on Job No. J- 0 Municipal Court-West Judicial District Case No. 162600, relative to a previous Stop Notice filed in connection with Warehouse and Maintenance Building and Oil Storage and Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m. , June 13, 1990. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change rder No. 7 to the lams and s ecifications for That Change Order No. 7 to the plans Contract Nos. Z-Z6-2 and 2-27 and specifications for Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and Lampson Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2, and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27, authorizing an addition of $56,773.00 to the contract with W. H. Ebert Corp. for nine items of additional work and granting a time extension of 12 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change order No. 8 to the lams and s ecifications for That Change Order No. 8 to the plans Contrac Nos. 2-26-2 and 2-27 and specifications for Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and Lampson Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2, and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a net addition of $270,519.30 to the contract with W. H. Ebert Corp. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting ontract No. -26-2 and ontract No. P-27 as complete That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 90-59-2, accepting Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and Lampson Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2, and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -16- 06/13/90 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications for Contract Nos. 2-26-3, -28 and That the Board of Directors hereby 2- 9 adopts Resolution No. 90-60-2, approving plans and specifications �J for Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, Between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-3; Katella Relief Sewer, Between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-28; and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29 (and City of Anaheim Street Improvements), and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: ADorovinq Agreement with Kraemer imperial Associates re acceptance That the Board of Directors hereby of new Grant of Easement in adopts Resolution No. 90-61-2, connection with reali ned ortion approving Agreement with Kraemer of Contract No. 2- A and Imperial Associates relative to authorizing execution of a acceptance of new Grant of Easement orporat on Quitclaim Deed in connection with a realigned portion of the Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9, (Realignment entitled Contract No. 2-9A); and approving and authorizing execution of a Corporation Quitclaim Deed, quitclaiming the District's interest in a portion of the original sewer line and easement therefor from Kraemer Imperial Associates. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Author z ng General Counsel to file a complaint in the Municipal Court That the General Counsel be, and is to seek recovery of unpaid sewer hereby, authorized to file a connection fees from Benco complaint in the Municipal Court Development seeking recovery of unpaid sewer connection fees in the amount of $7,038.00 from Benco Development. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing General Counsel to file a complaint in the Municipal Court That the General Counsel be, and is to seek recovery of unpaid sewer hereby, authorized to file a connection fees from Bristol Lane complaint in the Municipal Court Associates seeking recovery of unpaid sewer connection fees in the amount of $11,593.81 from Bristol Lane Associates. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of . Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at B:15 p.m. , June 13, 1990. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 t0 the A and s.ecifications for That Addendum No. I to the plans and .- Contract No - 5-1 specifications for South Coast Trunk - Sewer, Phase I, Contract No. 5-35-1, ^ making miscellaneous technical and traffic control clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved. -17- 06/13/90 DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Contract No. 5- 5-1 0 W. H. Ebert Corp. That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 90-64-5, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for South Coast Trunk Sewer, Phase I, Contract No. 5-35-1, to W. H. Ebert Corp. in the total amount of $880,066.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rcvin Memorandum of Understanding with he rvine Com an re Contract That the Memorandum of Understanding No. 5-J4-3 with The Irvine Company re construction of Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-34-3, be, and is hereby, approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Chairman and Secretary be, and are hereby, authorized to sign said Memorandum of Understanding in form approved by the General Counsel. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m. , June 13, 1990. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m. , June 13, 1990. DISTRICTS 7 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive ile and den amended Mi. of outhern California Edison That the amended claim of Southern Company re Contract No. 14-1-1B California Edison Company dated May 18, 1990 (original claim in an estimated amount dated 4/13/90 never received and filed) in the amount of $4,328.74 for alleged damages to a 12,000 volt line incurred during construction of Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road (and City of Costa Mesa street improvements) , Contract No. 14-1-1B, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the Districts' General Counsel , liability claims administrator, contractor and contractor's insurance company for appropriate action. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing in ation of proceedings re propoSea Annexat on That the Board of Directors hereby No. 135 - Williams Annexation adopts Resolution No. 90-65-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex 2.50 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the southeast corner of the intersection of Lemon Heights Drive and Lower Lake+�• Drive in unincorporated County territory (proposed Annexation No. 135 - Williams Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -18- 06/13/90 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m. , June 13, 1990. �. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m. , June 13, 1990. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m. , June 13, 1990. DISTRICT 3 Ac teoso ern a he Boards' re ev a tc tax increment policy re ress Redevelo ment Agency, Los Alamitos ace rack and Golf Course Redevelopmen Protect an the incoln Redeve p men Project Receive and file letter from GRC Moved, seconded and duly carried: Redevelopment Consultants, Inc. That the letter from GRC Redevelopment Consultants, Inc. dated April 11, 1990 proposing a pass-through of historical , proportional annual tax increment to District re Los Alamitos Race Track and Golf Course Redevelopment Project, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. A rovin A reement with C ress Moved, seconded and duly carried: Redeve o ment A enc reLos Alam tos ace lraCK and uotr course That the Board of Directors Redevelopment-Project hereby adopts Resolution No. 90-62-3, 'approving Agreement with Cypress Redevelopment Agency, re pass-through of historical , proportional annual tax increment to District relative to the Los Alamitos Race Track and Golf Course Redevelopment Project. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Elect ing a tax In ass- Moved, seconded and duly carried: throw re Linco n Avenue Redevelopment Project That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 90-63-3, electing a tax increment pass-through, pursuant to Section 33676 of the Health and Safety Code, relative to the Lincoln Avenue Redevelopment Project. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -19- 06/13/90 DISTRICTS 3 & 11 Actions re Addendum No. I to the Profess onal Services Agreement w ahn arollo En inears for RUpreps rat on of Pro,i ect eport re M o. -17 to provice for design and construction services Verbal report of staff The Director of Engineering reported that at the May Board meeting Directors approved a Project Report relative to Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17. Said improvements were included in the Districts' new 1989 30-year Master Plan. The Master Plan also identified the needed improvements as a joint project to serve portions of Districts 3 and 11 and would realize considerable savings to both Districts over the old master-planned system. In May the Boards also approved an agreement between the two Districts providing for financing, design, construction, capacity ownership (based on flows) and operation of certain master-planned sewage collection facilities serving Districts 3 and 11, including the Slater Avenue Pump Station system. Mr. Dawes advised that included within the drainage area originally anticipated to be served by the Slater Avenue Pump Station is 1,608 acres of land south of Los Patos Avenue and southeasterly of Warner Avenue, generally known as the Balsa Chica area. In April 1987 the Directors of District 11 authorized the staff and General Counsel to negotiate an annexation agreement with the property owners. The Signal Balsa Corporation 1s the principal landowner and the Board' s action was pursuant to Signal Balsa's request. The Balsa Chica area is presently outside the boundary of District li but within its sphere of Influence. Signal Balsa principals and counsel and Districts' staff and counsel have met numerous times over the past several years in an attempt to come to a pre-annexation agreement. However, Signal Balsa Corporation is not yet ready to annex and recently advised staff that they are no longer willing to proceed with the proposed pre-annexation agreement. The last draft of the proposed agreement provided for the annexation of the Balsa Chica area and prepayment of fees for those areas to be developed by Signal Balsa to provide the necessary funding for construction of capacity in the Slater Pump Station system to serve the Balsa Chica area if, and when, it is annexed. Because of the urgent need to proceed with design and construction of the facilities, staff reported that two letters were sentto Signal Balsa advising them that they must make a decision by May 16, 1990 on the pre-annexation agreement, and that without such an agreement, the Districts could provide no assurances that the area could be annexed or sewage service provided by the Districts in the future. Mr. Dawes reported that to date, Signal Balsa had not responded to the Districts' letters. ,v,, -20- 06/13/90 Staff noted that at the May Board meeting, it was the consensus of the Directors that unless a pre-annexation agreement was executed by Balsa Chica property owners, capacity to serve the area should not be included in the Districts' Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System. Accordingly, staff recommended that that the Boards proceed with negotiations for design and construction of this system. Mr. Dawes advised that a final decision on the capacity of the pump station would need to be made at the time the design contract is awarded, probably in July or August. Directors then commented on recent events indicating that The Koll Company may be replacing Signal Balsa Corporation as the major developer of Balsa Chica. Staff advised that they were aware of this and had been trying to contact officials at Koll regarding the Balsa Chica annexation issue. Staff and Directors then entered into a lengthy discussion regarding issues discussed at the May Board meeting relative to whether or not the Slater Avenue Pump Station should be sized to provide capacity for the Balsa Chica area without a pre-annexation agreement, which would require the rate-payers in Districts 3 and 11 to front the costs without any assurance that they would be recovered in the future. It was once again pointed out that if capacity for Balsa Chica is not Included in the Slater Pump Station system, Signal Balsa (or The Koll Company) would have to construct its own sewer lines through the Balsa Chica area and tie into the Districts' Coast Trunk Sewer at a cost that would be substantially higher than putting up the money now for capacity in the Slater Avenue Pump Station sewage system. .. Staff also reviewed the alternative Slater System capacities, costs and relative share between Districts 3 and 11 and without Balsa Chica. Staff reported that although the increase in costs to build the upsized pump station to provide capacity for the Balsa Chica area may seem relatively small , it would be a substantial burden to District 11 without the prepayment of annexation fees by Signal Balsa. Mr. Dawes further pointed out that if capacity for Balsa Chica is not included in the Slater Avenue Pump Station system, District 11 would realize additional savings in the future because the need for a proposed $2 million conveyance sewer would be eliminated. - Mr. Dawes reiterated that staff would attempt to meet with The Koll Company prior to asking the Directors to make a decision on the proposed capacity of the Slater Avenue Pump Station system. He indicated staff would report back to them at the July or August Board meeting with further information. Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried: - That the Staff Report dated June 5, 1990 re Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Authorizing the Selection Committee Moved, seconded and duly carried: to negotiate Addendum No. 1 That the Selection Committee be, and is hereby, authorized to solicit a proposal and negotiate Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for preparation of Phase I Preliminary Project Report for Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17, to provide for preparation of plans and specifications and construction support services. -21- 06/13/90 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:29 p.m., June 13, 1990. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:29 p.m., June 13, 1990. Secretary of Tne Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 -22- FUND` 9199 - JT OIST WORKING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/02/99 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP13 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY I CLAIMS PAID 05/09/90 POSTING DATE 05/29/90 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ( 106622 AIMS COMPANY/IMAGEN CORP. $212.19 COMPUTER SOMME 106623 AT B T $420.93' LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICE / 106624 SCHILTKNECHT MESSTECHNIK AS $600.00 METER REPAIR 106625 LINCOLN CARPETS R INTERIOR$ $311.41 CARPET REPAIR 106626 AOVANCO CONSTRUCTORS. INC. 5579.9A7.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-34-2 106627 AIR PRODUCTS G CHEMICAL INC. $15.296.00 DAN AGREEMENT OXYGEN GEN SYSTEM M.0.8-9-89 IQ6628 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT $28.88 ASPHALT 106629 ALLYATER SERVICES 62.430.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICE f 106630 ALTA SALES, INC. S505.01 INSTRUMENT PART 106631 ROBCO INC. A/OR AMERICAN SEALS $7.004.66 GASKETS 6 SEALS 106632 AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY 5369.22 CAMERA Y 106633 A-PLUS SYSTEMS 515.103.43 NOTICES 6 ADS 106634 APPLE ONE SI.122.70 TEMPORARY SERVICES 106635 ARI20NA INSTRUMENTS CORP. 5429.50 INSTRUMENT PARTS I06636 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CO. $1,564.13 TRUCK PARTS 106637 THE AVEBURY GROUP $2,529.98 MECHANICAL PARTS 106638 RC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY. INC. 5661.50 CABLE 106639 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $114.055.91 GRIT REMOVAL M.0.7-13-88 106640 BANANA BLUE PRINT SI.553.19 PRINTING 106641 P.V. BAROTTI AND ASSOC. 55.037.50 - CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PI-34-162,P2-37 / X 106642 BAXTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $1.597.35 LAB SUPPLIES 2 106693 BECKHAM INSTRUMENTS 5754.95 INSTRUMENT H 106644 JAMES BENZIE $413.48 MEETING EXPENSE �- b0 106645 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS 5206.68 OFFICE SUPPLIES 106646 BRAGG CRANE S RIGGING CO. $1,562.00 CRANE RENTAL 106647 BRINOERSON CORP. $1,071.352.80 CONSTRUCTION J-19-2 3a 106648 BROWN 6 CALDWELL CONSULTING $226.281.78 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19 1 106649 KATRINA BROWN S RUSSELL BROWN 5975.00 LIABILITY CLAIMS I06650 STEVE DONALD CONSTRUCTION CO. 1596.TL3.41 CONSTRUCTION 14-1-IB 1 106651 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $569.69 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 306652 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES9 INC. 310.5B4.OG ENGINEERING SERVICES - SURVEYING 306653 GARY G. STREED 51.320.44 PETTY MEN REIMBURSEMENT 1 - 106654 CAL-CHEM SALES $149.35 RUBBER PRODUCTS 106655 CAL SOUTH EQUIPMENT CO. $485.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 106656 CAL STATE SEAL COMPANY 997.30 PUMP PARTS 106657 CALTROL . INC. SI2.90 REGULATOR PARTS 106658 CAL TYPE OFFICE MACHINES. INC. $49.84 TYPEWRITTER MAINTENANCE 106659 CALIFORNIA FILTRATION $243.92 FILTER 106660 JOHN CAROLLO ENS. $10.545.16 RNGINEERING SERVICES - STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS 196661 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS 3221.904.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-36,P2-42,P1-20,1-9 196662 CASTLE CONTROLS. INC. S56R.6P VALVE 106663 CENTURY SAFETY INST. 8 STAFF. 1204.90 SAFETY SUPPLIES �- 106664 CHALLENGE BEARING B IND. SPLY $711.23 HARDWARE 106665 KELLY CHRISTENSEN $413.75 MEETING EXPENSE 106666 CHRO MAL OK SALES 11,029.11 ELECTRIC PART 106667 INN ONE CRANKSHAFT. INC. S4R0.00 MECHANICAL PARTS L J • FUND NO 9199 _ JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/02/90 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP41 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/09/90 POSTING DATE 05/09/90 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT OESCXIPTIDN 106669 CORIR GROUP OF INS.. AS s6$223.75 MEETING MUSE 306670 COAST AUTOMATIC CLA6SON $309.74 TRUCINC RTP8N58 17667I COAST IIUTRANS NISSION f309.19 TRUCE PARTS 106671 COASI FIRE EQUIP MEN7 381.50 FIRE EQUIPMENT 106672 COUCH AND SONS S347.395.50 CONSTRUCTION 7-11-163 106673 C.I.E.S. . CO. . INC. 1660.00 PUMP PARTS 106674 CONNELL G.M. PARTS / DIV. S258.99 TRUCK PARTS 106675 CON-WAV WESTERN EXPRESS 557.37 FREIGHT . I06676 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. S4.622.31 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 1. 106677 CO:30LIOATED PLASTICS CO. 3871.81 SANFL8 PARTS 106616 CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPHICS 198.43 BLUEPRINTING { 106679 CONTAINERIZED CHEMICAL DISPOSA 11.399.00 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL 106680 CONT INC NT AL GRAPHICS S1.941.95 BLUBPRINTINC M.O.7-12-89 106681 CONTROL CABLES. INC. $34.76 TRUCK PARTS / 106682 COOPER INDUSTRIES. INC. 31.820.145.6E ENGINES M.O. 5-13-87.6-8-88 1-19A 106603 COORDINATED EQUIP. CO.. INC. $500.00 TRUCK PARTS 106684 A. E. COULTER CRANE RENTAL 51 .188.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT ` 1 85 066 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 51.774.94 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 106686 ARTS TAL CLEAR WINDOW MAIN7. $515.25 WINDOW MEANING 106687 DANIEL$ TIRE SERVICE 3497.66 TIRES m ID6608 TOM DAWES $355.93 MEETING EXPENSE { X 106699 BE AREA CORPORATION $920.00 STORAGE FEES 2 106691 DMICHAELESKTOP G. DEBLIEUX $19.124.33 DRFERIND COMP PAYOFF UU 106692 DESKTOP GRAPHICS t OCSI6N 732.30 PRINTING � • 1 10669E DEZUSIM AND/OR CS CO. i1$839.74 VALVE PARTS 106694 DICNSONS - $494.06 PRINTING PARTS n 106695 DISCO P►0 ASSOCIATES f491.01 PRINTING N 106F95 DISCO PRINT CONSENT $7,218.87 OFFICE EQUIPMENT /06697 DOR ADO WARERP RISES. INC. $1.121.65 PUNT SUPLIESMAINTENANCE b REPAIRS 106697 DUNM COWARDS CORP. 51.121.85 PAINT SUPPLIES 106699 EAEIMAEB INC. 26.739.50 OFFICE ONSTR CONSTRUCTION SUPPLIES ]06699 E. N. EVERT CORP. f526.779.50 PRESENTATION 2-26-2.2-27 { l06700 EFFECTIVE VISUAL IMAGERY .497.72 INSTUMENTPRESENTATION RTD9 106702 ELECT0.0 NUMERICS INC. 92.782.50 ENGINEERING ARTS SERVICES 10670E EDVAAD L. ELLIQTr JR. s2riR2.IS MEAN SERVICES PI-33 306704 ENCHANTER, INC. 111.800.00 OCEAN MONI3Y3IINC M.0.3-14-90 106701 FACILITIES SUPPORT CO. f235.11 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 106705 JOHN S. FALKENSTEIN P.E. $4.425.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-4.J-20 1 106706 FARR SALES t SERVICE $241.86 FILTER 306707 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $169.25 AIR FREIGHT 10670E FERRELLOAS $22.95 PROPANE 106709 FISCHER t PORTER CO. 5122.966.74 CHLORINATION PARTS /INSTRUMENT M.0.12-14-88 106710 FI SEER SCIENTIFIC CO. $335.75 LAB SUPPLIES 106711 FLAT t VERTICAL CONCRETE f197.50 CONCRETE CUTTING 10671E FLEXIBLE SYSTEMS $338.92 STRAINER �- 106713 FLUID HANDLING SYSTEMS 51.455.45 PUMP L J_ o FUND�_ 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/02/90 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/09/90 POSTING DATE 65 tog /90 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION IR6719 FOXPORO CO. / M46 SYSTEMS 52.893.95 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 106715 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $978.04 • BUILDING MATERIALS I 106716 GENERAL TELEPHONE CD. 11,000.54 TELEPHONE SERVICES 306717 GEOR BE LEECH 1 ASSOCIATES f591.25 IH9tRUMENT SUPPLIES 106718 GIERLICH-KITCHF.LL. INC. $3,766.88 MECHANICAL PARTS 106719 GOLDEN COAST SAWDUST PROD. f3.825.110 SAWDUST 106720 GOOD HEART WILCOX CO. 525.29 PUBLICATION 106721 GRAPHIC CONTROLS 1141.67 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES f 106722 GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION S420.00 STREET SWEEPING 306723 DON GREEN S ASSOCIA I IS $1.111.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES - SURVEYING 106724 GEORGE T. HALL CO. f2085.18 SCRUBBER PARTS ( 106125 HlgRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS f312.93 GAUGE 106726 NARRIS DATA COMM., INC. $299.63 COMPUTER REPAIRS 106727 JAMES R. HARRIS $137.01 MEETING EXPENSE / 10672R HATCH S KIRK. INC. $2.925.01 MECHANCCAL PARTS 106729 HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW f55.CD PUBLICATION 106730 WILLIAM D. HAUSER 5926.00 NESTING EXPENSE 1 . 106731 S. A. HEALY CO. $102.603.59 CONSTRUCTION P1-35-1 306132 HILTI. INC. $25.66 WASHER 106733 HOERSIGER C.V.S. CALIF. . INC. 5110.13 MECHANICAL PARTS m 196734 HOUSE OF BATTERIES $96.65 BATTERIES = 106735 R.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. $3.469.93 PAINT SUPPLIES 106736 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STAMP 4410.991 RUBBER STAMPS CCI 106737 IND INDUSTRIES $1.529.22 ELECTRIC PARTS 106738 ISCO♦ INC. $14.025.00 ENGINE PARTS 106739 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $102.797.37� FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-08-89 1 106740 INDUSTRIAL METAL SUPPLY CO. 51.168.28 BASIN RAILS 1 l067A1 INDUSTRIAL 1HREAOED PRODUCTS $1,246.39 CONNECTDRS 106742 1NFt LC DE ONEM ONT. INC. $9.190.06 MECHANICAL PARTS 106743 INGRAM PAPER S1.383.38 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 106744 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $1.025.31 EQULPICE" ROYAL 2067.45 J 6 W SCIENTIFIC SI.530.72 LAB SUPPLIES 306796 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $897.69 INSTRUMENT PARTS I06747 JENSEN TOOLS S ALLOYS $154.53 TOOLS 196748 JOYCE OFFICE PRODUCTS f60.95- OFFICE SUPPLIES l 0$749 NALLEEN•S COMPUTER SUPPLIES $1.509:33 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 0 6 750 KAMAN BEARINGS 1 SUPPLY f6769 FITTINGS 106751 KANER COMPANY $1.508.49 HARDWARE / I06706753 KENNO. INC.52 THE KEITH COMPANIES 9910.75 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-3565-36 1 $780.113.70 CONSTRUCTION 5-34-2 206754 KIEWIT PACIFIC CO. $388,257.60, CONSTRUCTION PI-20 ` 106755 KING BEARING. INC. $1.826.53 MECHANICAL PARTS 1P6756 INOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $197.66 TOOLS 106757 MARTIN KORDICK. SP $2.550.00. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 1-I4-10 106758 L 1 C TIRE SERVICE 30 S.tl0 TRUCK PARTS L 106759 L.A. LIRD IO HANDLING SYSTEMS f205.20 PUMP PARTS L, . 1 FUND NO 19199 - JT GIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/112/90 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/69/90 POSTING DATE 05/09/90 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION r 196760 LIEBERT ASSOCIATES OF S179.82 ELECTRIC PARTS 106761 JOHN LISEE PUMPS, INC. 536.13 FREIGHT 116762 LORAIN PRODUCTS 51.194.65 SERVICE AGREEMENT - RELIANCE POWER 116763 MPS $293.31 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 106764 MACONCO $107.20 SERVICE AGREEMENT 106765 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS. INC. $2.574.50 MECHANICAL PARTS 106766 M / M ASSOCIATION $1.368.93 MEMBERSHIP 106767 MARVAC ELECTRONICS 1114.26 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 10676E MATT - CHLOR. INC. 12.172.92 MECHANICAL PARTS 106769 XETEMA $58.85 INSTRUMENT 106770 MCMENNA ENGR. A EQUIP. $5,121.41 PUMP PARTS / 106771 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. $1.053.82 PUMP PARTS 206772 MICROAGE COMPUTER S12.OBq.89 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 106773 MICROAGE COMPUTER STORES 54.059.81 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 106774 MICROSOFT QUICK BASIC 4.5 $322.94 COMPUTER SOMARE UPGRADE 106775 MILTON ROY COMPANY $294.33 PUMP PARTS 106776 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES $1.800.75 LAB SERVICES / 206777 MOORE PRODUCTS CO. $1.512.55 TRANSDUCER 10677E MOTION INDUSTRIES. INC. SBl6.94 NECHANICAL PARTS fTl 106779 NAT. COUNCIL FOR ED. ON INFO. $225.00 REGISTRATION / X 106780 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSN 133.50 PUBLICATIONS 2 106701 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES. INC. $97,489.26 CONSTRUCTION 5-27 106782 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $450.66 COMPUTER PART Y CU 106783 GUST N. NEWBERG CONST. CO. $2,985.437.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-33 4 106184 NEWARK ELECTRONICS 164.35 COMPUTER PARTS 106785 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 54.00 WATER DEBASE 1 n 106766 NORTH SUPPLY 958.30 YOKELS 106787 OFFICE PAVILION/INTERIOR RES. 143.694.75 OFFICE FURNITURE J-7-4 106788 ON SYSTEMS Co. S28.501.36 CHLORINE M.0.2-14-90 106789 OLYMPIC CHEMICAL COMPANY 12.967.24 CHLORINE M.0.2-I4-90 '106790 ORANGE BEARING. INC. $182.57 MECHANICAL PARTS 106191 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $190.10 TRUCK PARTS 116792 ORS NGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. S1.685.4P HYDROCHLORIC ACID 106793 ORANGE SPORTING GOODS 5191.24 LINE MARKER 206794 ORANGE VALVE A FITTING CO. 11.064.84 EIYYINCE 106795 OSCAR-S LOCK S SAFE $111.56 LOCKS 106796 OXYGEN SERVICE $755.96 SPECIALTY CARES 106797 COUNTY OF ORANGE 5200.00 MAPPING 106798 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 14.926.67 ORFERRED COME DISTRIBUTION 106799 COUNTY SANITATION DISTP ICT 1q.920.47 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE I06800 PACIFIC PARTS 55.454.59 INSTRUMENT PARTS ` 1P6B0] PACIFIC PROCESS EAUIPMENT.INC. f1.170.5P MECHANCIAL PARTS 11.6812 PACIFIC SAFETT CGUY PMENT CO. f1•09 T.89 SAFETY SUPPLIES 106803 PACIFIC BELL 5704.54 TELEPHONE SERVICES 106804 PACTEL CELLULAP $153.37 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES L 106805 PAK VEST 1333.20 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES J • F FUNk 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/42/90 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/09/90 POSTING DATE 85/09/90 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION / 106006 PEERLESS WIPING MATERIALS CO. S659.38 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ID6807 PERFORMANCE SEMINAR GROUP $165.00 REGISTRATION /- 106808 PERSPECTIVE MEASUREMENTS $8,256.81 INSTRUMENT 106809 POLY ENTERPRISES, INC. $990.25 SAFETY SUPPLIES 106810 FOLYPURE, INC. S28,771.27 POLYMERS M.O.1-10-90,8-9-89 ( 106811 POWER SYSTEMS $191.09 ENGINE PARTS 106812 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE f36.00 ICE 106R13 THE PROJECTS SOLUTION CO. S9,290.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O.8-10-88 � 106014 PEND OREILLE PUBLICATIONS 1I00.70 PUBLICATIONS 106A15 R.P.M. ELECTRIC MOTORS $1.027.74 ELECTRIC HOME REPAIR 106816 DAVID BAY f602.39 MEETING EXPENSE 106817 RED WING SHOES $87.51 SAFETY SHOES 106818 REMOTE METER RESETTING SYSTEM $3.000.00 POSTAGE , 106819 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. f560.05 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES l- 106R20 REMOLD POWER TRANSMISSION SIOT.95 MECHANICAL PARTS 106822 RICHARDS. MATSON E GERSHON 164.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.6-11-86 106922 MILTON RIVERA $573.22 MEETING EXPENSE M, T96623 J. R. RORERTS CORP. f966,671.70 CONSTRUCTION 3-17 C6029 R007 TR U[N ING 135.01 FREIGHT 106825 ROSEMOUNT/UNILOC 12,648.86 INSTRUMENT PARTS 106826 SAO NIFE INC. $1.635.00 UTTERIES X = 106827 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. $265.60 PARTS CLEANER 106028 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS f283.68 ELECTRIC MOTOR b0 106829 SANTA FE BAG CO. $395.70 UGS - IOAF30 THE SCMOOLIN Co. f2,200.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 106P31 SCHULER ENGINEERING CORP. f235,803,70 CONSTRUCTION PI-27-162 y /06032 SEA COAST DESIGNS $3,932.62 OFFICE EQUIPMENT (- In 106833 SEARS, ROEBUCK R CO. $95.60 TOOLS 106834 S.F. SERRANTINO $539.76 MEETING HUSHES 106835 SEVER EQUIP. CO. OF AMERICA $2.645.00 TOOLS 106836 SHAMROCK SECURITY S911.00 SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS 106837 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $254.50 TOOLS I 196N38 SMITH-EMERY CO. 05,410.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89 II6839 SOFT VA R E H OUSE S128.SP COMPUTER PARTS 106800 SO. COAST AIR QUALITY f1,350.00 APPLICATION FEES 106891 SO. CALIF. COASTAL WATER $200.000.00 SCCNRPA ADVANCE ` 106842 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. $4.197.93 POWER ID6093 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $5.754.30 DIESEL FUEL 106099 SPACESAVER SYSTEMS. INC. $2.161.25 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 206845 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $1,628.57 DRINKING WATER 106006 STAMEN 2, SPASSOFF, P.E. $5,760.I'8 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2,P1-33,P1-37 ` 106847 STAR TOOL 6 SUPPLY CO. S636.93 TOOLS 106848 SUMMIT STEEL SI,232.50 STEEL 196849 SUPER FOYER PRODUCTS S178.50 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ` 106850 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL. INC. $858.93 TOOLS 106851 T f C INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS, INC S1,291.23 ELECTRIC PARTS J � FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/02/9C PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBEP AP13 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/09/90 POSTING DATE 05/09/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 106H5? TALIN TIRE, INC. $2,263.34 TIRES 106853 THE TTNWIPE COMPANY S129.19 OFFICE SUPPLIES 106854 THEO-TELLO-BUSCH. INC. 1751.00 CHLORINE SYSTEM REPAIRS 106855 THERMO ANALYTICAL. INC./NNRCAL f76.00 LAB SERVICES 106856 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE. INC. $16,840.44 TRAFFIC CONTROL DIST 3 I- 1Y6857 TRAVEL TRAVEL $4,432.00 T'MVEL SERVICES H.O.6-14-87 106858 TRUCK L AUTO SUPPLY. INC. $878.03 TRUCK PARTS 106859 J.G. TUCKER S SON, INC. f575.30 INSTRUMENT PARTS 106860 TWINING LABORATORIES OF 38,242.75 BUIL TESTING M.0.6-I4-89 106861 UNOCAL $201.85 UNLEADED GASOLINE 106862 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE i70.99 PARCEL SERVICES 306P.fiJ VWR SCIENTIFIC f1.396.50 US SUPPLIES 306869 WALL EY Cf II ES SUPPLY CO. f5.700.28 FITTINGS 106865 PALLET DETROIT DIESEL $637.50 ERGIME REPAIRS � 106866 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 9486.41. SAFETY SUPPLIER 106067 RICHARD W. VON LANGER $349.16 MEETING EXPENSE IG6868 VORTEX INDUSTRIES S1I0.75 "PAIR MANUAL 106869 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC SI.352.57 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 106870 JOHN R. WAPLES $533.30 ODOR CONTROL CONSULTANT 1068T1 WARRINGTON 9115.00 INSTRUMENT CALIBRATI0N (X 106872 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY $14,042.94 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-9-89 = 106073 'WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $825.16 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 106874 WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY $4.940.63 INSECTICIDE T� 106875 JAMES S JUDITH NILSON 3365.74 LIABILITY CLAIM 106876 WORDPERFECT COPP. f11095.93 COMPUTER SOMME 106877 XEROX CORP. 55,045.20 COPIER LMSES 106878 MORRIS TING SB11.23 MEETING EXPENSE I_> 106879 2IEBARTH AND ALPER $721,034.10 CONSTRUCTION PI-34-1 Cl1 ----------------- { TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 05/09/90 $12.758,570.01 I ( J • ( ND 9199 - IT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/02/90 PACE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/09/90 POSTING DATE 05/09/90 SOMMAKY AMOUNT 02 OVER POND j 663.83 02 DAP PAC POND 627.797.45 03 OPEN POND 16.975.22 05 OPER FORD 1.446.71 05 CAP PAC FUND 822.360.63 06 CAP PAC FUND 1.175.25 07 OPER FOND 3.878.28 07 CAP PAC FUND 394.905.48 111 OPEN POND SL26 011 CAP PAC FUND 318.01 014 CAP PAC FUND 451.350.10 0566 CAP PAC FOND 66.689.26 0667 OPER FUND 2,043.60 . 07614 OPEN FORD) 9.14 JT OPEN FOND 399,974.42 GO IF 9,572,462.48 I SELF LANDED WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FIRED 12,417.85 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND 384,149.04 X j 12,758,570.01 w .1. n v J • FUND NO 1199 - JT GIST WORKING CAFI7AL PROCESSING OATE 5117/9R PAGE I a REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS DF ORANGE COUNTY WARRANT NO. VENDOR - .AMOUNT _-_DESCRIPTI,ON . 106928 A-1 EMPRESS DELIVFRY SERVICE $23.31 FREIGHT 106929 ADS KENT. INC. $96.2B _INSTRUMENT PART 306930 Al 1 7 -- i177.T! LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 106931 ACADEMY OF DEFENSIVE DRIVING S670.OR DRIVER TMINING 106932 ACCU-LAtli RESEARCH. INC. }ION..00__--_ -_-TAB..SERVICE_B—__—__-_____.,,,.,-,___,._. IOE933 THE ADVANCE GROUP $66.2G INSTR DID MY SUPPLIES 106934 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. $253.666.30 CONSTRUCTION PI-34-2 �. 106935 AERO TECIM SURVEYS. INC. fl 966.25 _AERIAL PROMRAPEY ��-105976 -AIRCR AA-TT�AT TN6 FF f:LECTRICAL --- ---�569.�E TRUCK PART ------ 106937 AIR COLO SUPPLY INC. S520.60 REFRIGERANT _ 10693E AIR PRODUCTS 6 CHEMICAL INC. F15.296.OU DAM AGREEMENT - OXYGEN GO SYSTEM M.0.8-9-89_ _ 1d6939 LEASING T S UTA� %AI_[68T T.EC—__ fTP9l a2 AIITON0UIL6 LMSEB / 106940 SAFETY SUPPLY AMERICA $12.64 SAFETY SUPPLIES 7. _ 106941 ALPHAGA2 �61 36�B.10 PROPANE 7. 3 R69Az- .fCT�v�TF B€dVTET$ - SI.S9A.dd VACUUM TRUCK SERVICE ------- I 106943 AMERICAN DISTRICT TELEGRAPH $553.36 SERVICE AGREEMENT 106999 ROSCO INC. 1/OR AMERICAN SEALS $4,566.88 GASKETS 6 SBAL9 U66 49-a MTn IFAx�EENffTUC-N6FUY— 184.—fir—reRA_— 106946 AMERICAN VULKAN CORP. $9.622.77 MECHANICAL PARTS 106947 AMERI:ECM $97.75 COPIER IBASE 6914F TTTi 0r__AUFETM 1 .235.90T. 9�-SEWER REHABILITATION M.O.fI-I0-N6- 106949 APPLE ONE $1,119.26 7mPOMRY SERVICES 106950 ABATER SERVICES. INC. $7.671.59 UNIFORM RENTALS u 11695I—__ S N H_0_C TRn0_NTF_S .— —_—fiOl.9r/— MEETING MUSE 106952 ARIZONA INSTRUMENTS CORP. $127.50 INSTRUMENT PARTS _ 106953 _ARROW TRUCK BODIES a EOUIFMENT $2.198.75 TOOL BOX 1d6959 SST—EO TAPED 60 NG NEERING 00 802L TESTING F.OaT6-d9 106955 AREA 1700.00 REGISTRATION 206956 _ FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $167.592.90 GRIT REMOVAL M.0.7-13-88 + I0b90T— P.V. PARO711 RN�(B�•d .E - - �500:p0 CONSTRUCTION KRRVIC86 PI-3A.PI 3A-'f.PR-3T ' 106950 R. UATEMAN $585.00 DEPERRBD COMP DISTRIBUTION w_IC6959 BARTER SCIFNTIFIC PRODUCTS $2.598.80 _ _LAB SUPPLIES "10106699661 SIOCYC RORCRT LoE f TF�17Li RM'Flfa3-TZ-F 3— 09..00 PUBLICATIION 106962 HOWARD BLEVINS $200.09 DEEMED CO S EDISTRIBUTION _ I E190S EDTsE<A 'nni 'OFF ICE POUOC - VI66:b5i SUPPLIES �3-38 106964 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE 19.327.32 RADIATOR REPAIRS 106965 BON-A-RUES $263.99 TRUCK PARTS 9DPL-L-ESE 7uEFR1A4-EsrtT--------- ------- 11-j555.05 ENGINEERING SERVICES .. 106967 BROWN 1 CALDVELL $2.559.75 LAB SERVICES 106968 BROWN 1 CALDVELL CONSULTING $138.728.7E ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19 �'.__....i469b9._ -.-_-....—'RI1Nni"EN&INEEBIN'D' Ed:.___._ __.. - . _.. .._ _ . .._.. i t96':65" _. _. _ _ ELEL'IRfC SUPPLIES _. _ .._...... ----.___- ( + 106970 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES. INC. f6.552.00 SURVEYING SERVICES US 88-71 106971 GARY G. STREED $257.47 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT FERRDUS CMI.DRIDaHx.4=12-119- (, 4 106973 CPI CORP. / SUMMIT SOLUTIONS $2,205.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT C. J ; FUND 9199 - JT QIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/17/9P PAOT 2 REPORT NURSER AP93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ' - WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 106974 CS COMPANY $3.263.07 VALVE PARTS 106775 CAL-GLASS FOR PESEARCM• INC. $2.003.17 LAB SUPPLIES —TOE976----CACTROL�N[._— --�-E37i7T:71T------RECU1.AfOR PA�RTQ r 166977 CALIF. BUSINESS LAW INSTITUTE $695.00 REGISTRATION 106978 CALIFORNIA FILTRATION $1.162.95 ENGINE PARTS _ --1Ud479- [AROCCA$DILTFAVINFFRT— ---'--TI"O s135TI---"-------"NNOinnfic s¢Nvmss Res 89-122 r n 106980 LEANDRE P. CATACUTAN 1394.68 MEETING EXPENSE 106961 CHALLENGE DEARING L IND. SFLY $766.94 MECHANICAL PARTS I99982 bL IRTGE-A-s-EFFINF71 t 196983 CHER SERVICE S55.52 LAB SUPPLIES 106964 CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC. $14,290.06 UNLEADED GASOLINE n -7OS9R5-�ARIIIIE-CIfAARSA'AFf' INC. f n 196986 COUCH AND SONS S363.647.70 CONSTRUCTION 7-11-11 106987 COMFRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF $3.265.13 FITTINGS _'-SOS9EE -[OANECL-"0�. iAA b- fiAQCR FART@- —. / 106989 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL OISTA $6.123.85 ELECTRICAL PARTS 106990 - CDNS OL/DA TED FREIGHT4AT3 $301.54 PR6ICtlT ;, —itld991-- tolin RENT7CRAER —'£f4S3":Sb- __— / 106992 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS $1.464.45 BLUEPRINTING M.0.7-12-69 I0fi993 CONTROL DATA CORP. $381.13 INSTRUMENT PART -�-IQb99§—_--LTAIADL'C'Q--' 574b. cNA@LCAL�ANT� _- 2 106995 COOPER INDUSTRIES, INC. - SE•425r082.60 ENGINES M.0.3-13-07.6-8-88, J-19A i--. 106996 COORDINATED EQUIP. CO.• INCA . $250.00 TRUCK PARTS _ f0b99T-'--LIISTA-RES'A_A0TSUPPLY sl• d -TNd_'#ARTs ----'-"- 106998 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 1652.86 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 106999 CRANETEN $366.30 TRUCK PARTS :� �-l370Q0--._--LRA9EW@i OARBACOMPANY :bIIQ:QDL3ABfLf9'P-CLATR---.________ 1 lo7081 CAL WATER $287.44 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 107002 LARRY CURTI TRUCK S EQUIPMENT $23.940.00 SLUDGE REMOVAL K.O.A-13_86 _-__LQ70bS--DRETTRH-_ _-- .--337G.IT--VALV@ FARTS_. 107004 BE ARIA CORPORATION L150.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 107005 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES SLSOT.65 PRINTING " -1070Od-----DISLO-PAiRT-CONFAN9-- TiE�IS-- -OPPYCB'eQUYPNeN7� I07J07 DUNN EDWARDS CORP: 1735.79 PAINT SUPPLIES lo1008 D•VALS SALES $342.55 FITTINGS _._INSTRUMENT i. 107039 ENSECO-CRL $2.350.90 OCEAN SAMPLING 107011 EASTMAN• INC. 181R.56 OFFICE SUPPLIES P__-III7D1.4___ _—._.EL115VSRR�ENGINEERIRd T7AAL OCEAN'RESRARCI---_. / 107013 EFFECTIVE VISUAL IMAGERY $22.64 SLIDES 101014 ELECT AIR S§66.18 MECHANICAL PARTS .. , ...__107015_..__.....____ECEt7PDNfC-BALtNCINd-[Q—__ . ._._._._.-_. ._. .--3306.V 0- _.__ . ._..____. _.-DRAFT 107316 ABU SERVICE COMPANY S323.76 VALVE PARTS 197017 FACILITIES SUPPORT CO. $33.08 SHALL HARDWARE FATRRES..____—_-__._...._____.___._.._-,f35OGSC._._.____ _._.._DEFERRED 06H@'QtSTRY6UTf6FT_____ j 107019 JOHN D. FALKENSTEIN P.E. S3.739.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 3-7-4. J-20 l FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/I7/96 FAGF 3 ' REPORT NUMBER APA3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 0 g5723791—PO ST 1116 OA TE P5f23T90 • WARRANT NO. _ VENDOR _ AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ( +_ 307920 FARR SALES t SERVICE $8,580.49 FILTERS 107021 _ FEDERAL EMPRESS CORP. $172.50 AIR FREIGHT 107R22 F15CNF:R 6 POR iCR CO. $ 25.UB INSTRUMENT PARTS ( • 107023 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $455.18 LAB SUPPLIES 1 O)029 _ FIAT t VERTICAL CONCRETE $856.50 CONCRETE CUTTING 97G25 [111D TEC 1(-- fP91.' SCRU68BR PART 7 ' . 107NP6 FORD AEROSPACE 6 CONN. CORP. $19.941.54 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT 107027 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $307.29 PHOTO SUPPLIES I67320 FOX EN E� RPRISES - S1,825.00 SAP6Tf CONSULTING ( ' 107029 FOXBORO CO. / BAG SYSTEMS - $1.324.64 PITTINGS 10703D A.F. FREY - 3105.00 DEFCRREe_ COMP DISTRIBUTION _ 14fi31— FBUSY ENGINEERING SERVICES CO. 1199.61 VALVES 107032 CITY OF FULLERTON $39.91 WATER USEAGE 107033 GTE EDUCATION SERVICES. INC. $48.63 AREA BULLETIN HOARD O TS3�GAN HL LU CO. $205.98 - TIMES 1 ' 107035 GARDNER LITHOGRAPH $189.50 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 107036 GENERAL CHEMICAL $7.688.00 0®IICALE IOTG37 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. f9.596.81 TELEPHONE SERVICES I 107038 FLORENCE L. GERDES S471.20 MEETING MERGE 107039 GIERLICH-MITCHELL• INC. $11,342.81 MECHANICAL PARTS X 1 00 GOLDENurst-WETTININC CO. f 58.01 REFUND USER PER OVERPAYMENT 107041 GREAT- WESTERN RECLAMATION $3,800.00 STREET SWEEPING SERVICES 107042 DON GREEK 8 ASSOCIATES $10.519.00 SURVEYING SERVICES RES 88-72 c §7 UO3 GCARLD L. GP.E R O.. INC. SI.620.31 TRUCK PUTS ^I y 107049 HANSON-LORAN CHEMICAL CO. $3,210.55 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 107C95 FRED A. HARPER $1.495.00 DEFERRED CND' DISTRIBUTION U Ii117946 H R G N INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS G • 9 VALVE PARTS ' W 107347 HATCH t MIRK. INC. S6.790.15 ENGINE PARTS 101048 HOCRRIGER C.V.S. CALIF. I INC. $415.04 CONPRESSDR PARTS G73§9_ mFAT�p.A-pt70N(CF S50B.Go DETERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 107050 HOUSE OF BATTERIES $1,136.99 BATTERIES 157051 STEVEN J HOVEY ST4.95 MEETING MERGE IDim— H.S. G .. INC. $2.026.94SnFETY SUPPLIES 107053 CITY OF HUNTINGTON REACH $15.918.50 WATER USEAGE 107854 HUNTINGTON SUPPLY f114.99 HARDWARE --1E7355-- Itt-TN'S'fNTDAF'Ffi ---;;ZS BEYER-REPAIRS 107056 IVA ENGINEERS f7.005.09 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-27-2 107A57 IMPERIAL VEST CHEMICAL f79.361.51 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-08-89 ., —ZET 658—_--7N�DL p-'Ey57[AG� 'IB5 3S— 'eicixe PM'fs 107059 INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS.. INC. $74.36 ELECTRIC PARTS 167960 INDUSTRIAL THREADED.PRODUCTS $1.053.79 CONNECTORS ( . 107362 INSIDE WASTE C/O CAP. RFPOPTS $259.09 SUBSCRIPTION 107063 INTERNATIONAL SENSOR TECH. f9.957.55 INSTRUMENT PARTS VAT ERA fiTR'It7—'------- --E1'G:9§------osYEa NsenbH -- ( 107065 GREAT VESIERN SANITARY SUPF. S1.556.60 jANIWRIAL SERVICES FUND ( 9199 - JT UIST WORFIHP CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/1?/9V PAGE q REPORT NUMBER A143 COUNIV SANITATION UISTPICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ......-___.._.__...---Mlths FAfli"i51WOd -RRs7iloW ME'0123Tse-_._ r s WARRANT N0. VCNOOP AMOUNT __ DESCRIPTION _ 1-7066 A.F. JOHNSON COMPANY $97.26 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 107067 GERALD JONES $842.25 MEETING EXPENSE Iu7dSB"�"JtlYEE-tlFF'IEE PRDRUEiT' ----'--iiS7.75 -- ---_._---- Orin RUPPLI86 ------- ---- 107069 KALLEEN•S COMPUTER SUPPLIES $410.91 CONPIEI'CR PARTS 10707E KAMAN BEARINGS 6 SUPPLY $43.29 IRITINGS r 107072 KEEN-KUT ABRASIVE CO. - S499.38 TOOLS 107g73 'KING BEARING. INC. S702.112 MECHANICAL PARTS --"1 D707i`RAIIT7A60STRI}L'-SAFFCTE3" --57i7d'1- - --- -Y'bdL3----'--------- '-'-"-----�— i 107075 MARTIN KOROICK. SR S2.475.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 1-14-1 107076 N.V. LXUMASTES G CO.. INC. $7.294.50 SOIL TESTING .- Id iu77" -LEEtl3"-L'-RDRTHR -iTiiT So --iN3YRuneeT SiiPZfR�--- - 10707R LIEBERT ASSOCIATES OF 6674.44 ELECTRIC PARTS 107079 WILLIAM J. LLOYD S89.25 MEETING EXPENSE --ti7ieG-�DL2C-F6EREx Ef9r.ou+1Pt0 Fmi / 1 107001 LOB ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION 31140.A28.37 POOLED MISSIONS ESTIHATtHO PROGRAM M.O. 12-13-89 . 107092 A.J. LYNCH CO. $1.276.02 JANITORIAL SUPPLIER _ 07593 MnS NUCLEAR TW . 52.163.00 S[AYICC RCRe@f8N'f 107684 MPS saa.54 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES _ Arms _ MALCOLM PIRNiE . INC. $2,733.97 ENGINEERING SERVICES -"-I89be6 --RFRy}E-ELECTRONICSS :B5 I�Raflli¢Nr SDPPLIF9 -- X 107087 KETEMA 61,08.39 INSTRUMENT REPAIR = 1070OF MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. 6752.71 BUILDING MATERIALS 3 d77R9— NE}g�RGRLREAY2DDIND�S. INC. TI'�324.12 -- --iRSTRUHENT PARTS -- ---"-----"-- =� 107090 THOMAS 11. MELTON SIB7.79 MILEAGE EXPENSE 1 107091 MICROAGE COMPUTER $5.213.69 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 147593- N7ERDEGF-LDAA91iTE1F-§TERL -�3:i7rI9 0"ePIE3RQUiPRNT_ __ f (A 187093 MILLIPORE AND/OP WATERS S8.228.94 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 107994 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL. INC. $102.00 PUBLICATION -ii 7f9s—�ICFA�dbR --iil�90- --(E@TINc e3PRNsa— - --- 107096 MORGAN CRANE CO.. INC. $1.411.82 TRUCK PARTS 107097 MOTION INDUSTRIES, INC. S430.17 MOTORS i77dlb- Ti Gf5Ro . 107099 MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICES $88.38 INSTRUMENT REPAIR 107100 HULICK. INC. S95q.93 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT - ----1b7rRi-------N671DM .L-FEaT sE�v 12EsTAi:--- sa-aiT:ad---------__...-vAEE11i ERDCE ARR� 107102 NATIONAL SANITARY SUrrIY S196.78 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 107103 NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION 6509.UU DEPOSIT . 117104 EITP DF-p[GFdwT-BiAtf✓- --._--___��.9�_.________.WATRR 1 107105 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH S76.00 REFUND USSR PEE OVERPAYMENT 10730E CHARLES IICH OL5 $29.54 MEETING EXPENSE -. iD7id7"-.-._._.._NdREAI EDGIAGL3: lHL:" ..__...-._ __. ._-__..__. --i19T2S._ _.-. _._. ___. - - HEGBAFIiEAL PARTS- . ."_ .. . _.... . I87108 UNITED NOTTINGHAM $31.88 FREIGHT 107109 O.H.S./SOLAG DISFOSAL CO S85.00 TRASH ROIOVAL Et7C6—__._—.._�CLUFATIRRRL-yISIOff . ( 107111 ON-LINE ELECTRONICS $112.10 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING C4FIT4L PROCESSING DATE 5/17/9S PACE 5 REPORT NUMUER AP43 _ __ COUNTY SANITATION,DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY BI ,_........____._..__._._......_._..._____ i r � - --- ----CLFS PAIR IM3/90 P0411N05M H713790--"" WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION / 107112 POETRY J. GOTEN 3262.20 MEETING RAPERS& 197113 ORANGE BEARL. INC. __ f349.76 107114 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY f39S.55 _ 61.6CCRIC BNPPLIES r ' 107115 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY CO. 3337.85 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 10711E O0.AN6E VALVE S FITTING CO. _ .0__.._. M._43• FITTINGS ' 107117 OSC AR•S LOCK i SAFE $44.30 -------EHYS � �----------- - �_- -- - � ' ! + 107118 OXYGEN SERVICE $2,298.70 SPECIALTY CASES '. 107121 COUNTY OF ORANGE $3.'JO5.00 DATA UMPROCESSING.ADVANCE SERVICLP __, 107121 CSOR SELF-FUNDED MISTRAL INS fI$6.466.14 REIMBURSE ADVANCE ]07121 COUNTY SANIIAT TON DISTRICT $ N66.14 RBIMBVRSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE 107122 RORERT L. CITRON ST5.00 D9PERRE9_COMP__FL51iRA 107223 PACIFIC SAFETY EOUIPMENT CO. $5,284.36 SAFETY SUPPLIES 107124 PACIFIC SEWER MAINTENANCE CORP 38.861.16 SUER PIPES 147125 PAM WEST $1.299.44 JANITORIAL SUPPLII9_____„______ 137iz6 31EVC PELLE71ER 9347.87 MEETING MERGE ( ICT127 ROY PENDERGRAFT 3440.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 10712E PHOTO A SOUND CO. $1,154.40 OPPiCR BgUIPnRMt_ ,_,_, U71P9 Y LLIAM PIERCE $103.00 MEETING EXPENSE 107130 PIMA SRO SYSTEMS. INC. $44.243.47 SLUDGE REMOVAL H.0.5-11-86 I07131 PING YOH $147.47 R8B USER PRE OVBRPAYMEM'l IMU '6L E TR Ev u HARDWARE TT2s 1.90—E— � HARD ARE --�--'— t = 107133 POLYPURE. INC. $300203698 POLYMERS M.O.1-10-90.8-9-89 •',_ty 107134 FOYER ELECT GO SUPPLY CO. _ S13B.]1 eLRCFRICSUPPLIeB _ w 107115 PRESENTATION PRODUCTS $759.58 OFFICE SUPPLIES 107136 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $144.00 ICE ~ 3HOT__ FROFESSIOH4L TRNG ASSOCIATES 339.00 _8VBSCRIPTION ___ _ +� to I071 JB PROFESSIONAL TR E CAR $2,000.00 118E REMOVAL In 107139 THE PROJECTS SOLUTION CO. $4,399.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION H.0.8-10-88 _ 107190 04DCLIFFE CONSULTING GRP %280.00 PUIG' 1371 i1—' NA�Inno�5PO5 Cii co.- .O7r.I3 TRASH REMOVAL _ 107142 NECTC♦ INC. 339.900.00 SLUDGE REMOVAL 11.0.3-11-88 307143 R.A. RECD ELECTRIC 3403.2E ELECTRIC.MOTOR _ iR SI 99 - JEFFPC�. RFYD ----S�E:'ES- -- MSBTING MERGE ( 107345 THE REGISTER $43B.55 NOTICES 6 ADS 107146 REMEOV TEMP SL339.59 TEMPORARY SRRVICos.___. 1471Vf I HT NEV UbLIC $UPF LY E0. "S 60'Fl tN9'CRUMENT SUPPLIES 107148 HEWES ENGINEERING CO. $1,652.18 MANHOLE COVERS ! ICT149 RICHARDS. WATSON 0 GERSHON 37.492.23 LEGAL SERVICES M.O. 107151 ROYCE INSTRUMiNT $1.131.23 INSTRUMENT PARTS 167152 PUTAN S TUCKER 329.336.29 LBCAL SERVICL4 - 89A711IC6/BURL' d.UNIVRRB/IL CIRO11178 + _...._.. _._.._.. .... ..._ _. ..... $10.136.13 ............___..__.._. CRATING 1 137164 JOSEPH I. RYERSON B SON. INC. 3437.19 PUMP PART 107155 SAFETY-MLEEN CORP. 3132.RO PARTS CLEANER -Iffy] _ TJa--"—_1i A A CCE7R1c 7t6foR'6-- iiic.iT' eLeeTEie-NUToa"---- 107157 SANTA FC BAG CO. $35.01 FREIGHT C ... + r / r FUND N 9)99 - JI OIST•VORKING CAr ITOL PROCESSING DATE 5117/91 PAGE 6 r 111 REPORT MUNOER AP13 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY r ; WARRANT NO. VENDOR _ _-_ AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ___ r : lb7158 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS TNTQ SP12.435.52 OCKAN MONITORING N.0.6-14-89 107159 SEA COAST DESIGNS 12.296.72 OFFICE FURNITURE --Ib7lSS_ _SE7EAT8QIp ED.—oF'7fWLR1'EF______ __ilif87:88_.._ ._._ ._.TwiS. _____.__._. F' . 107161 SHAMROCK SUPPLY S616.81 SAFETY SUPPLIES 107162 SHARED LOGIC, INC. 9225.00 REGISTRATION_ (' 107164 CONSTANTINE SIPCELLO $15.391.50 OBPERRPn CORP PAY-027 107165 SMITH-EMERY CO. $1.690.00 SOIL TESTING H.0.6-14-89 iD716d-_—_.SOFT-YARFRTUS i}B.D�- —COMPUTER SOFTWARE f 107167 SOIL AND TESTING ENGINEERS $246.00 SOIL TESTING H.0.6-14-89 10716E SOLAR TURBINES INC. S99.78 FREIGHT 1'077d9---50:Cd113T�gR-OUtLTTP-- --f7:DSb30 -ApEL3cn4iop vEes—___--_�.___._-- / 107170 SOUTH COAST DODGE S127.08 TRUCK PARTS 101171 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. $289.478.41 POWER 7772 —8 • CALIr. LUINUM UNA S8.1911.61 PURER POLE 11E TION PI- 3 ! 147173 SO. CAL. GAS CO. - 06.192.05 NATURAL GAS 107174 SQ. CALIF. WATER CO, $90.63 WATER USEACE 7i75— SDUiRCOUNTIES OIL CO. DIESEL eon. - ------ / 107176 SVARKLEYTS DRINKING WATER $1.546.67 DRINKING WAYNE 107377 WESTALLOV INC. S2.285.17 MELDING SUPPLIES _ 67178 SPIRAL BINDING CO., INC. FFSCE 3WPLi Plf f 107179 STAR TOOL B SUPPLY CO. . $566:18 TOOLS 107108 - STERLING ART $41.59 GRAPHIC SUPPLIES -E67111 R7R u •B�I�EETIxc NKPEx3E -`---- 3( 107182 SUMMIT STEEL $2.434.93 STEEL 1U7183 SUN-BELT LANDSCAPE S MAINT. $3.647.00 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEBPIBO H.O.B-9-89 1D77Ri--3OITECEETR " 3£.ti -TRUCE PARTS ---_— ( 107185 SUNSET FORD $21.58 _ TRUCK PARTS 147186 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL. INC. $8.171.66 TOOLS '1377R7---9UWVEYORS__§nnZ S:lI4—b"7 SAPeTn sUFPLI7S-- ---_____ ( 16718R TAYLOR-BUNN $106.25 TRUCK PARTS IU7189 TEKMAN COMPANY $1.510.25 LAB SUPPLIES ID7190— TOWWE-AD9ERTTSERS— $9.07 .77 ASSESHENT'DSE& FEE MAIL DIET 2 167191 7RAVCL TRAVEL 12.274,00 TRAVEL SERVICES M.0.6-I4-87 161152 TRUCK 6 AUTO SUPPLY. INC- 5543.65 TRUCK PARTS 107194 TWINING LABORATORIES OF S7.190.25 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-09 107195 THE UNISOURCE CORP. 18.999.50 PAPER _ --IW719b— OW7T[R7RITCEC--SCRWRE— ____-- _._B1d3.39-- —PARCEL 9NR0I2BS—_____— ( 107197 MILLAR ELEVATOR COMPANY - $326.15 SERVICE AGREEMENT IOT198 YYR SCIENTIFIC $2.089.17 LAB SUPPLIES -kmULATOR 107210 VALLEY CITIES SUFFLY CO. S4.311.99 FITTINGS 107291 VARIAN INSTRUMENT GROUP 4693.25 LAW EQUIPMENT ➢7282----YTRIRGZR0IR7N'TAC SOPPL7BR- - 107203 LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. INC. 16.921.14 CONSULTING SERVICES - CLEW WATWR GRAMS f FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING GATE 5117/90 PAGE 7 REPORT NUNOEP AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY —CI'A'ENS--FErV US-123790-'Fd417 i19'6ATE-"6377375D—_.__.._.. WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION - 107204 MARK D. WALTEN $190.00 MEETING EXPENSE 307205 UALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC S239.06 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 107Y 06 �L3ARL QA dRYFrB 52r592.39 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR ' . 107207 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL S56.75 PUBLICATION 107206 GARY WELLMAN $342.80 MEETING EXPENSE 0710�WHIRLPOOL COPP. SSd.Ti 7- _REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT !-- � 107210 WTLLDAN ASSOCIATES $391.62 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-29 107211 ROURKE 6 WOODRUFF $46,296.39 LEGAL SERVICES H.0.6-4-89 XEROX CORPI DOPIER LEASES 1DI213 YELLOW SPRINGS INSTRUMENT CO. $134.43 LAN REPAIRS 107214 VICTOR ZORZYNSNI S600.27 MEETING EXPENSE I67215 -- RICHARD 0. EDGAR $200.00 OEFIGRED COME DISTIBUTION ---- ----------------- TAL CLAIMS PAID[H$/23?9O $5.614.944.53 SUMMARY AMOUNT 0 r'OPER- 12 OPER FUND 13,995,15 02 CAP PAC FUND 1,255,107.43 3-DPER77FUNU 7331TI1� —_- 05 OPER FUND 5,858.09 05 CAP PAC FUND 55,338.66 —16-OPER-7PONU 573 v , 07 OPER FUND 13.883.96 07 CAP PAC FOND 366,705.47 all oeERZ+URp— - T. 4'J':6T -- 01l CAP FAC FOND 16.76 013 OPER FUND 30.00 —0I6.OUR TRIED T992-9i— -- 914 CAP PAC FOND 4.297.47 1566 OPER FWND 993.14 —0566 CAP PAC_POND-- ___ _ __——._.__I:174.50__._ 1 , 07614 OPER FUND 769.40 3T OPER FOND 1.014.210.78 CORY.__.______—_ ___— —ZZ9675203� SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FOND 119,862.03 JT WORKING CAPITAL FOND 179.126.23 0 5.61b 066.57 _— ___._._ __._ __. ......... , J BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127• 10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County. California Fountain Valley,CA 9272"127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 JOINT BOARDS AGENDA WEDNESDAY, JULY 11, 1990 - 7: 30 P.M. RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 A minute excerpt has been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item No. 4, it is appropriate to receive and file said excerpt: DISTRICT 3 (4 ) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpt from the City of Stanton re election of mayor and appointment of alternate Director and seating a new member of the Hoard: (*Mayor) District Active Director Alternate Director 3 Edward L. Allen* David J. Shawver REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN u JULY 11 , 1990 1) UPCOMING MEETINGS A. CANCELLATION OF JULY 12 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING - THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE WAS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON JULY 12TH IN A SPECIAL MEETING TO CONSIDER AN APPEAL BY UNIVERSAL CIRCUITS CONCERNING STAFF DENIAL OF A PERMIT FOR THEIR NEW FACILITY ON SOUTH YALE STREET IN SANTA ANA. AFTER POLLING THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS, WE HAVE DETERMINED THAT WE WILL NOT HAVE A QUORUM. THEREFORE, IT HAS BEEN DECIDED TO CANCEL THE JULY 12TH MEETING AND DEFER THIS MATTER TO ANOTHER DATE. MOTE: ASK COMMITTEE MEMBERS [BY A SHOW OF HANDS] IF THEY PREFER TO HOLD THE UNIVERSAL CIRCUITS HEARING: AT A SPECIAL MEETING ON THURSDAY, . -OR- AT THE REGULAR MEETING ON WEDNESDAY, OtltY-25FH- Qur dlr I B. FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY, JULY 18TH AT 5:30 P.M. -ITEM 1 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE- -1- a.� C. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY, JULY 25TH AT 5:30 P.M. ( INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS TO ATTEND: ) ALLY ANNE SHERIDAN BOB SIEFEN - OR - (WAYNE SILZEL) - OR - (CHARLES SYLVIA) D. CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION 5 REUSE COMMITTEE - THE CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON THURSDAY, JULY 26TH AT 5:30 P.M. E. BUILDING COMMITTEE - THE BUILDING COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON TUESDAY, JULY 31ST AT 5:30 P.M. -END OF REPORT- -2- MEETING DATE 7/11/90 TIME 730 P.M. DISTRICTS 1 ,2,3,5,6,7, 11 . 13 6 14 DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS ,Lt (CRANK)........WAHNER...... ✓ (SHAWVER)................ALLEN.......JG ✓ (EDGAR)........PUCKETT...... _ (AGE)....................ARNOLD.......j/ ✓ (YOUNG)........GRISET...... (GREEN)..................BANNISTER...,G W (ROTH).........STANTON..... _ (WEDAA)..................BIGONGER.... J— (HORSY)..................BAgt....... DISTRICT 2 (PLUMMER)................COX......... �. (MAIN)...................CULVER...... AL (HUNTER).......PICKLER......_ _ (PUCKETT)................EDGAR....... (SC TT)........NEAL........JA! _ (MAHONEY)................GRAHAM...... (WEDAA)........B IGONGER....!/ (CHESSEN)................GRIFFIN.....JG (NSOAR)........BIGON EA....JL _ (YOUNG)..................GRISET...... JG JL (YOUNG)........GRISET...... (PLUMMER)................HART........ (GRAHAM).......MAHONEY..... (GRAHAM)................ MAHONEY.....� 100, _ (CULVER)......MMEM........JA! (CULVER).................fAMIM....... _ (WEDIN)........NELSON...... (SILVA)..................MAYS........ b" Z (ECKENRODE)....NEWTON...... ✓ (SCOTT)..................NEAL........Ae. JL (SALDARINI)....SILZEL...... (WEDIN)..................NELSON...... �_ (BARRERA)......SMI TH....... (ECKENRODE)......... (ROTH(ROTH) �L ).........STANTON..... (HUNTER).................PICKLER...... G �L (HART)...................PLUMMER....... X! JL DISTRICT3 (MINER)..................POLIS....... JL (EDGAR)..................PGMTIOUS.... �L (MINER)........POLiS .......l (EDGAR)..................PUCKETT.....JG (WILES)........SIEFEN....... (STANTON)................ROTH........ . (SHAWVEA)......ALLEN.......JC (COX)....................SANSONE...... G Ale- (AGE)..........ARNOLD......J�_ _ (AGRAN)..................SHERIDAN....JG (GREEN)........BANNISTER... _ _ (WILES)..................SIEFEN.......e (NORBY).......ELMM* ..... we _ (SALOARINI)..............SILZEL...... (MAIN).........CULVER...... le- _ (BAARERA)................SMITH....... (MAHONEY)......GRAHAM...... ll � (ROT")...................STANTON.....J�, AA� (CHESSEN)......GRIFFIN......J e_ (MILLER).................SWAN........ (YOUNG)........GAISET....... L�_ (WAHLSTROM)..............SYLVIA...... ✓ JL (SCOTT)........NEAL......... _ _ (CRANK/FERRYMAN/GREEN)...WAHNER......-jG JL (WEDIN)........NELSON.......W- (BIGONGER)...............WEDAA....... ✓ �L (HUNTER).......PICKLER...... L (NELSON)................Aiem ...... (ROTH).........STANTON...... (LASZLO).................WILSON......-& GE (WAMLSTROM)....SYLVIA...... _ _ (GREEN)..................49RE Mi.....JL L (LASZLO).......WILSON....... DISTRICT 5 (PLUMIER)......HART........LC (COX)..........SANSONE.....,G — (STANTON)......ROTH.........Ae_ _ SYLVESTER... BROWN....... DISTRICT 6 ANDERSGN.... CLAWSON.......L (HART).........PLUMMER.....✓ _ DANES.......JA! (FERRYMAN).....WARNER.......A,� HODGES......�C (STANTON)......ROTH........ _ KYLE......... LINDER....... DISTRICT 7 NELSON...... NICHOLS.....Z (BARRERA)......"ITM....... 00 TEN.......J/ (PUCKETT)......EDOAR....... _ _ STREED.......kgt* (PLUMMER)......COX......... VINCENT..... (YOUNG)........GRISET.......IC — _ VON LARGER (STANTON)......ROT.........��_ _ HINSON...... (AGRAN)........SHERIDAN....J� _ _ yv,AAw a. (GREEN)........WARNER....... �_ _ ')_-- DISTRICT 11 OTHERS: IDE WOODRUFF....... ANWAR....... (GREEN)........09HINIM...•✓ _ _ DEMIR....... (SILVA)........MAYS........JA!_ FLEMING..... (ROTH)..... STANTON.....JC_ _ HOHENER..... HOUGH....... DISTRICT 13 HOWARD.......Sle HUNT........ (BIGONGER).....NEDRA....... ✓ KNOPF.......— (NELSON).......AiEOiNY....... LINDSTROM..._ (HUNTER).......P ICKLEN..... _ _ LYNCH....... (STANTON)......ROTH........ a► _ STONE.......3Lp.- (BARBERA)......SMITH....... _ _ WASON......._ DISTRICT 14 YOUNG......._ � (MILLER).......SWAN........� (ABRAM)........SHERIDAN.... L� (EDGAR).......•PGNTIGUS....Y (STANTON)......ROTX........ (BARRERA)...... SMITH....... _ 07/11/90 7-11-90 JOINT MEETING NOTES R4 - Receive 6 file minute excerpts Vice Joint Chairman Mahoney welcomed Edward Allen back as the Active Director from Stanton. I6(a) - Report of the Joint Chairman SEE ATTACHED REPORT. Directors chose to reschedule the special Executive Committee meeting to consider the appeal of Universal Circuits from July 12th to August 1st at 5:30 p.m. Vice Chairman Mahoney requested that the Directors hold the packet of information they had already received rather than rerun the material and mail it again. Mr. Mahoney noted with regard to the Fiscal Policy Committee meeting on July 18th that he would be unable to attend and had therefore asked Director Wahner to preside over the meeting. i6(b) - Report of the General Manager No special report. Just reminded Directors that he had mailed out a copy of the Districts' updated general information brochure and hoped they found it to be informative and useful. Mr. Sylvester advised that if Directors would like additional copies, they should see the Districts' Public Information Officer, Corinne Clawson, after the meeting. S6(c) - Report of the General Counsel The General Counsel briefly reported on the court hearing re Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson. He said before the hearing, the court called and advised that the judge could not hear it as scheduled. It is now set for July 23rd. The Universal Circuits case is also moving along slowly, probably pending until the outcome of the upcoming hearing. N7 - Election of Joint Chairman The Vice Joint Chairman noted that nominations had remained open since the last meeting. Director Silzel moved that nominations be closed. Motion seconded and carried. Director A. B. °Buck° Catlin was unanimously elected Joint Chairman. N8 - Election of Vice Joint Chairman Director Edgar then nominated William Mahoney. It was moved and seconded that nominations be closed. Director Mahoney was unanimously elected Vice Joint Chairman. He thanked the Directors. X11(k) - Removed from Consent Calendar re SCAQMD fees Director Polls requested that this item be removed. He questioned how these fees compare to last year's? The General Manager advised that the estimates are exactly the same but would be surprised if they don't go up. Director Silzel stated that since we have received awards for air quality, the cost of administering our air quality should be reduced rather than Increased. He said he would like to have a breakdown of these costs for this year explained to Directors as they occur or after they occur. Directors Polls and Roth expressed opposition to this action, along with several others ?? It was then moved and seconded to approve issuance of the purchase order. The motion carried by voice vote. N28 - DISTRICT 5 re Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Contract 5-34-2 The Director of Engineering reviewed the work on Pacific Coast Highway. The District originally contracted with the City of Newport Beach to construct Contract No. 5-34-1. Gasoline contamination was found and the City removed the District's project from their contract. There was a Mobil station at PCH and Bayside thought to be the cause of the problem. Mobil entered into an agreement with the District to pay any extra costs associated with the contamination. The work was added to District's Contract 5-34-2 including the extra work due to the contamination. Have not determined the full costs yet. This Change Order is about 90% of the total . This will not result in any additional cost to the Sanitation District as Mobil will pay the difference. This Change Order Includes the $106,000 originally included 1n the City of Newport Beach contract. Anything above $106,000 will be paid by Mobil. Mr. Dawes noted that the second item of work Included in the change order was for relocation of two City water lines at the intersection of Jamboree and Bayside Drive. The City didn't know they were there as they were very old lines. The District solicited bids from subcontractors that the City found acceptable to work on their City lines. This amount is to be paid for by the Sanitation District. The work is completed and was done by tunneling under Pacific Coast Highway. Chairman Hart commented that this was explained much better here than by the City staff this afternoon. N29 - DISTRICT 5 re subordination of easement for Contract 5-35 The Districts' General Counsel explained that this pertains to the downcoast sewer. Several months ago the existing facilities were all inventoried and the Laguna Beach Water District had a line in existing Coast Highway that they wanted to abandon. They quitclaimed their Interest back to The Irvine Company. The trench that was there was ideal for the Sanitation Districts. The Irvine Company then gave us an easement to use the same trench plus 14 feet. Re Tract Map 14131, which the County had approved for Pelican Hills, there was a condition that The Irvine Company could not give easements to anyone. This easement was then discovered. They wanted the Sanitation District to subordinate to County for street purposes. We usually always take a subordinate position anyway. This is not a County highway but procedure is that the County rejects the plan and then it goes to Cal Trans. The County asked us for the %.s subordination. Mr. Woodruff said he didn't think the District's position would be impaired. This just means that public streets and highway purposes have priority. -2- Director Sansone inquired about the public restrooms in Crystal Cove and if this was going to affect them. Tom Dawes replied no, we are tunneling under and building a sewer for them which is being paid for by The Irvine Company. TLW reiterated that we have to subordinate to County and the County will subordinate to Cal Trans. #32(a) - DISTRICTS 6, 7 & 14 re Supplement No. 1 to EIR Tom Dawes reported that the draft EIR was prepared and circulated earlier this year. The comment period ended March 20th. We received more comments after comment period ended. Contract Nos. 14-1-1A, 14-1-1B and 14-1-2 go from the Main Street Pump Station to Reclamation Plant No. 1. It is a $24-25 million project. It is the major project to serve District 14 and will also serve Districts 6 and 7. The original EIR described the project but did not go into great detail re acquisition of easements. We need four easements from (1) the County of Orange re airport clear zone; (2) through business parking lot west of Harbor Blvd. ; (3) north of Santa Ana River and through Mesa Verde Golf Course; and (4) between flood control channels. None of these will sell easements willingly. Will probably require condemnation proceedings. The big issue of the Supplement to the EIR is the acquisition of easements from property owners. Their attorneys have expressed strong dissatisfaction with alignment. The Final Supplement No. 1 gives very complete answers to their objections. 14/ -3- REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN JULY 11, 1990 1 ) UPCOMING MEETINGS A. CANCELLATION OF JULY 12 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING - THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE WAS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON JULY 12TH IN A SPECIAL MEETING TO CONSIDER AN APPEAL BY UNIVERSAL CIRCUITS CONCERNING STAFF DENIAL OF A PERMIT FOR THEIR NEW FACILITY ON SOUTH YALE STREET IN SANTA ANA. AFTER POLLING THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS, WE HAVE DETERMINED THAT WE WILL NOT HAVE A QUORUM. THEREFORE, IT HAS BEEN DECIDED TO CANCEL THE JULY 12TH MEETING AND DEFER THIS MATTER TO ANOTHER DATE. NOTE: ASK COMMITTEE MEMBERS [BY A SHOW OF HANDS] IF THEY PREFER TO HOLD THE UNIVERSAL CIRCUITS HEARING: AT A SPECIAL MEETING ON THURSDAY. P.M. -OR- AT THE REGULAR MEETING ON WEDNESDAY, jbtY 25TH I B. FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY, JULY 18TH AT 5:30 P.M. -ITEM 1 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE- `.r -I- C. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY, JULY 25TH AT 5:30 P.M. (INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS TO ATTEND: ) SALLY ANNE SHERIDAN A 80B SIEFEN - OR - (WAYNE SILZEL) - OR - (CHARLES SYLVIA) D. CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION & REUSE COMMITTEE - THE CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON THURSDAY, JULY 26TH AT 5:30 P.M. E. BUILDING COMMITTEE - THE BUILDING COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON TUESDAY, JULY 31ST AT 5:30 P.M. -END OF REPORT- -2- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 29 39 59 69 79 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON JULY 119 1990 PpiTA770N ,4�w9°lla. O OIST9 ORgNGEjGOV ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on July 11, 1990, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Foll'wing the Pledge of Allegiance and'invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a Quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, S. 7, 11. 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: x James A. Wahner, Chairman Ora Crank —7—Charles E. Puckett, Chai man pro tem _Richard S. Edgar x Dan Griset Dan Young =Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 2: x Iry Pickler, Chairman Fred Hunter x _ James Neal, Chair an pro too George Scott =Roland E. Bigonger —Henry W. Wades A.B. -Suck- Catlin x Chris Norby -7—Dan Griset _Dan Young x William D. Mahoney Beth Graham Robert H. Main x Norman Culver xCarrey Nelson _Wayne Wedin -7--Arthur G. Newton Norman Z. Eckenrode = _ Wayne Silzei Harold Saldarini a Don E. Smith Fred Barrera x Roger Stanton —Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 3: x Richard Palls, Chairman _Eva G. Miner 7—J.R. -Bob- Siefen, Chairman pro tea _Dewey Wiles =Edward L. Allen _David J. Shawver x Margaret M. Arnold _Cecilia L. Age x Wes Bannister Peter Green A.B. -Buck- Catlin =Chris Norby =Norman Culver —_Robert H. Main =Beth Graham William 0. Mahoney =Don R. Griffin —Donna L. Chessen =Dan Griset —can Young =James Neal —George Scott xCarrey Nelson _Wayne Wedin =Iry Pickler Fred Hunter 7—Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth x Charles Sylvia _Robert Wahlstrmm a Edna Wilson Frank Laszlo DISTRICT NO. 5: x Evelyn Hart, Chairman _Ruthelyn Plummer =Phil Sansone, Chai man pro tem John C. Cox, Jr. x Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton DISTRICT N0. 6: x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman _Evelyn Hart x James Wahner, Chairman pro tea James M. Ferryman =Don R. Roth =Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 7: a Don E. Smith, Chairman Fred Barrera x Richard Edgar, Chairman pro tem —Charles E. Puckett x John C. Cox, Jr. —Ruthelyn Plummer =Dan Griset —Dan Young =Don R. Rath _Roger Stanton =Sally Anne Sheridan Larry Agran =James Wahner _Harry Green DISTRICT NO. 11: Grace Winchell, Chai mw.i x Peter Green x Tom Mays, Chai man pro tea Jim Silva =Roger Stanton _Dan R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 13: x Henry W. Wedaa, Chairman Roland E. Btgonger —Wayne Wedin, Chai man pro ten xCarrey Nelson xIry Pickler —Fred Hunter x Dan R. Rath _Roger Stanton a Don E. Smith _Fred Barrera DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chairman _Darryl Miller =Sally Anne Sheridan, Chairman pro tem _Larry Agran x Leslie A. Pontious Richard B. Edgar =Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton a Don E. Smith Fred Barrera -2- 07/11/90 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita J. Brown, Board Secretary, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Corinne Clawson, Ed Hodges, Penny Kyle, John Linder, Charles Nichols, Bob Ooten, Rich von Langen, Mark Esquer OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel , Walt Howard, Bill Knopf, Phil Stone x x x x x x x x x x x x x DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: eceive and f 11 e mi nute excero from th� Stanton That the minute excerpt from the City appointments of Stanton re election of mayor and appointment of alternate Director and seating a new member of the Board, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows: (*Mayor) District Active Director Alternate Director 3 Edward L. Allen* David J. Shawver ALL DISTRICTS Vice Joint Chairman Mahoney reported Report of the vice Joint C airman that Joint Chairman Catlin is still recouperating from a recent accident and is doing well . The prognosis is for a full recovery. Mr. Mahoney also conveyed Mr. Catlin's appreciation for all the expressions of concern and get well wishes from Directors, friends, associates and others. In the absence of Joint Chairman Catlin, Vice Joint Chairman Mahoney reported that after polling the Executive Committee members, it was determined that they would not have a quorum for the special Executive Committee meeting scheduled for July 12th to consider an appeal by Universal Circuits concerning staff denial of a permit for their new facility on South Yale Street in Santa Ana. Therefore, it was decided to cancel the meeting. The Vice Joint Chairman suggested several possible dates for rescheduling the hearing, and the Directors selected August 1st at 5:30 p.m. Vice Chairman Mahoney then reported that the Fiscal Policy Committee was scheduled to meet on Wednesday, July 18th, at 5:30 p.m. He advised that he would be unable to attend, but he had asked Director Wahner to chair the meeting in his absence. He also called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, ' July 25th, at 5:30 p.m. , and invited Directors Sally Anne Sheridan and Bob Siefen to attend and participate in the discussions. The Vice Joint Chairman then advised that the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee was scheduled to meet on Thursday, July 26th, at 5:30 p.m. Mr. Mahoney added that the Building Committee was scheduled to meet on Tuesday, July 31st, at 5:30 p.m. -3- 07/11/90 ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager commented on the Report of the General Manager Districts' updated general information brochure which had been mailed to all Directors. He noted that additional copies were available by contacting the Districts' Public Information Officer. ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel reported on the epor of the General counsel status of litigation filed by Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. and Universal Circuits, Inc. concerning industrial waste discharge permits. ALL DISTRICTS This being the annual meeting fixed by nnua ectlon of Joint hairman the Boards of Directors for the election of the Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization, the Secretary stated that A. B. "Buck" Catlin had been nominated at the regular meeting of the Joint Boards on June 13, 1990, in accordance with established procedures. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director A. B. "Buck" Catlin as Joint Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. ALL DISTRICTS This being the annual meeting fixed by Annual action of Vice Joint the Boards of Directors for the Chairman election of the Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization, nominations were then called for the post of Vice Joint Chairman, whereupon William D. Mahoney was nominated. There being no other nominations, the vote was then polled, and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director William D. Mahoney as Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. Vice Joint Chairman Mahoney then thanked the Directors for electing him to the post. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 13, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 13, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 13, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 13, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. `.. -4 07/11/90 DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or Approva of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 13, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 13, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 13, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or Approval of minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 13, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 13, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of a ent 01 Joint and ndividuai District Maims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 6/06/90 6/20/90 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 918,175.98 $ 673,452.21 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 7,532,152.00 331,418.17 Joint Working Capital Fund - 116,375.26 184,104.17 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 13,256.68 9,006.36 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 30.48 64.19 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 217,916.85 23,653.45 DISTRICT - 144,569.06 35,416.21 DISTRICT F.5 - 198,604.12 32,708.28 DISTRICT NO. 6 - -0- 189.25 DISTRICT - 554,704.14 14,734.28 DISTRICT N . 11 - 303.55 6,462.56 DISTRICT NO. 1 - -0- -0- DI TRIG 14 - 1,095,834.75 2,469.75 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 8 6 JOINT - 14,392.53 1,010.52 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 1,977.49 -0- DISTRICT NOS. 7 8 14 JOINT - 3 009.68 769.40 1 11, 02.57 1, 15,458.80 07/11/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing and directing execution and filing of documents necessary That the following resolutions for Federal and State Grants for authorizing and directing execution the 1 - 1 Joint Works Improve-- and filing of documents necessary for ments and AdUltions Federal and State Clean Water Grants and Loans under 33 U.S.C., 1251 at seq. ; Chapters 12.5, 13, 14 and 15; and Division 7 of the California Water Code, and providing certain assurances in connection with the 1990-91 Joint Works Improvements and Additions, be, and are hereby, adopted by the respective Boards of Directors: District No. Resolution No. 1 90-66-1 2 90-67-2 3 90-68-3 5 90-69-5 6 90-70-6 7 90-71-7 11 90-72-11 13 90-73-13 14 90-74-14 Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 6 to the plans Jab No. J-15A and specifications for Prepurchase and Installation of Variable Frequency Drive Systems and Pumps for Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Jab No. J-15A, authorizing a deduction of $72,000.00 from the contract with General Electric Company for the difference between design and actual efficiency ratings for the equipment, as provided in the contract specifications, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 30 to the lans and s ecifications re That Change Order No. 30 to the Job NOS. P1- 0 and FI-31 plans and specifications for Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20, and Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts; and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. PI-31, authorizing a net deduction of $35,426.58 from the contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. for 15 items of additional or deleted work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Job Nos. PI-20 and PS- 1 as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-75, accepting Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20, and Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts; and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -6- 07/11/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 3 to the That Change Order No. 3 to the plans plans and specifications re and specifications for Primary Job No. P1-33 Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant - No. 1, Job No. P1-33, authorizing an addition of $21,667.00 to the contract with Gust K. Newberg Construction Co. for two items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 1 to the plans Job No. PS-34-1 and specifications for Gas Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-1, authorizing an addition of $52,748.00 to the contract with Ziebarth 8 Alper for four items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 3 to the plans Job No. P1-34-2 and specifications for Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-2, authorizing an addition of $32,443.52 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. for eight items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 9 to the plans and specifications re That Change Order No. 9 to the plans Job No. P2-37 and specifications for Miscellaneous Modifications and Improvements to Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-37, authorizing an addition of $115,453.00 to the contract with Ziebarth 8 Alper for seven items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratifying action of staff in issuing a purchase order to Dorado That the Boards of Directors hereby Enterprises, Inc. re emergency ratify the action of staff in modifications to the City of issuing a purchase order to Dorado Fountain Valley water lines Enterprises, Inc. in a total amount not to exceed $39,500.00 for emergency modifications to the City of Fountain Valley water lines serving the Administration Building, Laboratory and Maintenance/Warehouse complex at Plant No. 1 required by the City and State Health Department. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: - Amending Boards' action re issuance of purchase order to F. E. Carleton That the Boards' action of May 9, for professional consulting services 1990, be, and is hereby, amended, re obtaining SCAQMD permits and authorizing staff to issue a other SCAQMD issues purchase order to F. E. Carleton in an amount not to exceed $50,000.00 for professional consulting services, on an as-needed basis, for a two-year period beginning May 10, 1990, to assist the Districts in obtaining permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) for current and future projects at both treatment plants, and for assistance relative to other SCAQMD issues, correcting the hourly rate for said services from $95.00 to $115.00. -7- 07/11/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amendin Boards' action re ar c at ion in the Fooiea That the Boards' action of Emissions Estimation an December 13, 1989, be, and is with of er POTWs in alifornia to hereby, amended, relative to conduct testing re compliance with participation in the Pooled the California Air Toxi cs "Hot Emissions Estimation Plan (PEEP) Soots" Inventory and Assessment Act with other POTWs in California to of 1 AB 2588 conduct necessary testing at a considerable savings re compliance with the California Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Inventory and Assessment Act of 1987 (AB2588) , increasing the authorized amount for the Districts' participation from an amount not to exceed $500,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $750,000.00 for additional Districts' site-specific sampling and analysis required to comply with said Act. ALL DISTRICTS Several Directors questioned or Authorizin s ao ou ff to ssue aas r commented on the annual fees purchase or er Co required to be paid to the South Quality Management District for Coast Air Quality Management o ent of various Fees required District (SCAQMD). Some expressed or f sca year 990-91 their opinion that in light of the recent SCAQMD Clean Air award received by the Districts, they felt that the various annual SCAQMD fees should be reduced in the upcoming fiscal year, and several Directors spoke in opposition to the payment of these fees. It was requested that staff submit a breakdown of all fees paid to SCAQMD during the 1990-91 fiscal year and report to the Board next year when this item is up for reauthorization. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried by voice vote: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to South Coast Air Quality Management District in an amount not to exceed $300,000.00 for payment of various fees required by SCAQMD regulations, payable during fiscal year 1990-91, estimated as follows: Type of Fee Amount Annual Emissions $94,000 Annual Operating Permit 45,000 Permit Evaluation . 289000 Hot Spots, Toxics and Precursors 18,000 Source Test Analysis 60,000 Miscellaneous Fees 55,000 TOTAL $300,000 Directors Richard Polis and Don Rath requested that their votes in opposition to the motion be recorded. `/ -8- 07/11/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file summons an Complaint o Enforce Stop Notice on That the Summons and Complaint to Payment Bond; for Breach of Written Enforce Stop Notice; on Payment Contract; Common Counts and an Bond; for Breach of Written Contractors cense Bond Acme Contract; Common Counts and on Rents Inc. vs. terra Industria Contractors License Bond, Acme u ers Inc. et al. Orange Rents, Inc. vs. Tierra Industrial county municipal ourt- est Builders, Inc. , at al . , Orange Judicial District Case No. IbZ85T7 County Municipal Court-West Judicial re Job No. J-20 District Case No. 162859, relative to a previous Stop Notice filed in connection with Warehouse and Maintenance Building and Oil Storage and Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Summons and am la int to Enforce to Notice That the Summons and Complaint to and om laint an Pa ent Bond Enforce Stop Notice and Complaint on Carpenters southern California Payment Bond, Carpenters Southern Administrative corporation vs. California Administrative Oran ! Count Sanitation Districts Corporation vs. Orange County et a ran a ount Munici al Sanitation Districts, at al . , Orange (;ourt-west Judicial D str c Case County Municipal Court-West Judicial No. 163462, re Job No. J-ZU District Case No. 163462, relative to a previous Stop Notice filed in connection with Warehouse and Maintenance Building and Oil Storage and Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive fi a an a rove written r ort of the onserva on That the written report of the Reclamation and Reuse committee Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee's meeting on June 28, 1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Amendment No. 3 to A reement for Removal , Processin That Amendment No. 3 to Agreement and Dis osal of Sewage solids with for Removal , Processing and Disposal - Recyc, inc. of Sewage Solids with Recyc, Inc. , providing for an extension of the term of said agreement to February 11, 1991, with no change in the current agreement provisions and cost ($380.00 per truck load) , and providing for annual extension of said agreement by the General Manager upon mutual agreement, in farm approved by the General Counsel , be, and is hereby, approved. 07/11/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: rov n Are amen w ur i ruc an E ui mNt for removal . That the Agreement with L. Curti processing Ed disposalOT Truck and Equipment for removal , Districts, solids residuals processing and disposal of `../ Districts' solids residuals, for a period expiring April 12, 1991, at a cost of $380.00 per truck load from Plant No. 1 and $420.00 per truck load from Plant No. 2, and providing for annual extension of said agreement by the General Manager upon mutual agreement, in form approved by the General Counsel , be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive file an a rove written repot o e xecutive Committee That the written report of the Executive Committee meeting held on June 27, 1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Establishing District rocedures for settlement of wor ers' That the Boards of Directors hereby Com ensat12n claims made a a nit adopt Resolution No. 90-89, the D s r e s establishing District procedures for settlement of Workers' Compensation claims made against the Districts. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: n n Fiscal lic a utmm ain lcif or That the action of the Fiscal Policy Excess Workers Compensation Committee in placing statutory insurance covers a effective Excess Workers' Compensation July 1, 199U insurance coverage, with $250,000 self-insured retention, effective July 1, 1990, for an annual premium not to exceed $36,257.00, be, and is hereby, ratified. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin o11c re furnishin vehicles or managemen perso9nnel That the Boards of Directors hereby and repealing Resolution No. 73-15 adopt Resolution No. 90-84, approving policy re furnishing vehicles for management personnel and repealing Resolution No. 73-15 and all other previous resolutions pertaining thereto. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 1990- 1 fists year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1990-91 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 13,742,000 Capital Facilities Fund 17,261,000 Construction Fund - 1986 4,034,000 Construction Fund - 1990 25,313,000 TOTAL $ 60,350,000 -10- 07/11/90 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 1 - 1 fiscal ear carried by roll call vote: budge That the District's 1990-91 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the -� following amounts: Operating Fund $ 35,161,000 Capital Facilities Fund 64,996,000 Construction Fund - 1986 11,949,000 Construction Fund - 1990 76,002,000 TOTAL $188,308,000 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approv ng 1 9 - 1 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1990-91 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 42,645,000 Capital Facilities Fund 69,836,000 Construction Fund - 1986 13,496,000 Construction Fund - 1990 81,883,000 Bond 8 Interest Fund - 1951 269,000 TOTAL $208,129,000 DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and unanimously A rovin 19 0-91 fiscalyear carried by roll call vote: udget That the District's 1990-91 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: . Operating Fund $ 9,673,000 Capital Facilities Fund 9,452,000 Construction Fund - 1990 20,850,000 Bond 8 Interest Fund - 1951 33,000 TOTAL $ 40,008,000 DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 199 - 1 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1990-91 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 7,768,000 Capital Facilities Fund 10,260,000 Construction Fund - 1990 15,500,000 TOTAL $ 33,528,000 -11- 07/11/90 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and unanimously Aobrov ng 19 - 1 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1990-91 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the `./ following amounts: Operating Fund $ 13,218,000 Capital Facilities Fund 28,253,000 Construction Fund - 1990 25,603,000 Bond & Interest Fund - 1962 296,000 TOTAL $ 67,370,000 DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and unanimously A rovin 1 - 1 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budge That the District's 1990-91 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 11,175,000 Capital Facilities Fund 13,709,000 Construction Fund - 1990 26,120,000 Bond & Interest Fund - 1958 37,000 TOTAL $ 51,041,000 DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 1990- 1 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1990-91 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 917,000 Capital Facilities Fund 12,414,000 TOTAL $ 13,331,000 DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 1 - 1 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1990-91 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 1,233,000 Capital Facilities Fund 13,483,000 TOTAL $ 14,716,000 -12- 07/11/90 DISTRICTS 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Esta shin a annual ann a ro rta ions limit for f sca That the following resolutions year 1 establishing the annual Gann appropriations limit for fiscal year 1990-91 for each District in accordance with the provisions of Division 9 of Title 1 of the California Government Code, be, and are hereby, adopted by the respective Boards of Directors: DISTRICT RESO. NO. LIMITATION 1 90-76-1 $ 2,273,000 2 90-77-2 8,539,000 3 90-78-3 11,384,000 5 90-79-5 2,174,000 6 90-80-6 1,362,000 7 90-81-7 3,317,000 11 90-82-11 2,339,000 13 --- Not Applicable 14 --- Not Applicable Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 1,2,3.5,6,7 8 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizin each District to reimburse Its capital fund reserves That the following resolutions from the proceeds of approved authorizing each District to reimburse Indebtedness issues its capital fund reserves from the proceeds of approved indebtedness Issues, for the expenditure of funds for the design and construction of any capital facilities projects identified in the 1989 Master Plan of Facilities, be, and are hereby, adopted by the respective Boards of Directors: District No. Resolution No. 1 90-90-1 2 90-91-2 3 90-92-3 5 90-93-5 6 90-94-6 7 90-95-7 11 90-96-11 Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:55 p.m. , July 11, 1990. -13- � 07/11/90 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: ADr)rovinq Change Order No. 2 to the plans and s ecifica tons for That Change Order No. 2 to the plans contract No. 2-11-3 and specifications for North Branch of the Rolling Hills Drive Relief Subtrunk Sewer (and City of Brea sewer) , Contract No. 2-11-3, authorizing an addition of $87,590.00 to the contract with Colich & Sons (JV) for six items of additional work and granting a time extension of 145 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: rov n an a Order No. to the fans an sec cat ons tor That Change Order No. 3 to the plans contract o. 2-11-3 and specifications for North Branch of the Rolling Hills Drive Relief Subtrunk Sewer (and City of Brea sewer) , Contract No. 2-11-3, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a net deduction of $4,442.00, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accep ng Contract No. -11-3 as complete That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 90-83-2, accepting North Branch of the Rolling Hills Drive Relief Subtrunk Sewer (and City of Brea sewer) , Contract No. 2-11-3, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:55 p.m., July 11, 1990. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:55 p.m. , July 11, 1990. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file 5unvnons and Complaint for Personal Injury, That the Summons and Complaint for Jahn L. Smith vs. City of Personal Injury, John L. Smith Huntin an Beach et al . Orange vs. City of Huntington Beach, et County uperior Court Case al., Orange County Superior Court No. 571306 Case No. 571306, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:55 p.m. , July 11, 1990. -14- 07/11/90 DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: d]ournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 7:55 p.m. , July 11, 1990. DISTRICT 5 Actions re Change Order No. 1 to Contract No. -3 - Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering reported that in January 1990 the Board awarded Contract No. 5-34-2, Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, to Kenko, Inc. in the amount of $1,959,690.00 for approximately 6,500 feet of 36-inch diameter gravity sewer pipe along three separate deteriorated sections of the Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer (originally installed in 1936) in Bayside Drive from Pacific Coast Highway to Marguerite. Mr. Dawes advised that Change Order No. 1 adds $495,775.00 to the contract and explained that $106,320.00 is for work previously deleted from Contract No. 5-34-1 and added to Contract No. 5-34-2; $282,355.00 is for work to be reimbursed by Mobil Oil Co. ; and $107,100.00 is for relocating City of Newport Beach water lines. He further reported that Item No. 1 of the change order included work that was originally part of Contract No. 5-34-1 which was to be constructed in conjunction with the City of Newport Beach project for improvement of Pacific Coast Highway, and it was bid as part of the City's project. However, only a small portion was completed under the City contract. The major portion was deleted when the City discovered subsurface gasoline contamination. Mobil Oil Co. , the operators of a service station on the southeast corner of Bayside Drive and PCH, met with staff regarding the subsurface contamination. Staff and Mobil Oil developed a plan whereby the District would tunnel under the intersection to avoid disruption to traffic and complete the Contract 5-34-1 work deleted by the City, and Mobil would reimburse the District for all cost increases above the original bid for the sewer work before the gasoline contamination was discovered. Staff pointed out that the costs were not final yet. Remaining costs are estimated at $25,000.00 for added traffic control and slurry work. Mr. Dawes reiterated that District 5 would not incur any additional costs over and above the $106,320.00 deleted from Contract No. 5-34-1 and the bid prices for Contract No. 5-34-2. Any such costs will be reimbursed by Mobil. He further reviewed Item No. 2 included in Change Order No. 1 relative to relocation of two City of Newport Beach water lines found in the intersection of Jamboree Boulevard and Bayside Drive. The City was unaware of the water lines at the time the contract was approved. Because the work was extensive and specialized, staff and project designers prepared plans and specifications for the relocation, secured approval from City staff, and awarded the work to the low bid subcontractor after receiving bids. It was noted that these additional costs will be paid for by District No. 5. There may be additional . costs incurred before the work is completed which would be submitted as a separate change order for the Board's consideration at a later date. -15- 07/11/90 Approving Change Order No. 1 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: laps and s eci fications for contract No. -34-2 That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 2, Contract No. 5-34-2, authorizing an `�../ addition of $495,775.00 to the contract with Kenko, Inc., dba McGrand 8 Associates, for two items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 5 Actions re Subordination of District's easement ri hts to County of range re ontrac o. 5-35 Verbal report of General Counsel The District' s General Counsel reported that the County of Orange had requested that the Disrict approve an agreement subordinating their interest in an easement granted by The Irvine Company to District 5 in connection with construction of the downcoast sewer (Contract No. 5-35). He explained that several months ago, the Laguna Beach Water District abandoned an existing line in Pacific Coast Highway and quitclaimed their interest back to The Irvine Company. The District can use the existing trench for a portion of the proposed downcoast sewer. Accordingly, The Irvine Company granted the District an easement over this trench plus an additional 14 feet. However, the County of Orange had placed a condition upon the approval of The Irvine Company's Tract Map No. 14131 relative to the Pelican Hills development which stipulated that The Irvine Company could not give easements to anyone. This condition applied to the easement previously given to District No. 5 re Contract No. 5-35. Mr. Woodruff indicated that it is standard practice for the Districts to take a subordinate position for street purposes, and this agreement would not impair the District's position. He added that since this easement is in Pacific Coast Highway rather than a County street, District 5 would subordinate to the County and they, in turn, will subordinate to CALTRANS. Receive and file General Counsel 's Moved, seconded and duly carried: Memorandum re subordination agree- ment with County oP Orange That the General Counsel 's Memorandum dated June 26, 1990 re subordination agreement with the County of Orange in connection with District's easement rights relative to South Coast Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-35, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Approving agreement with County of Moved, seconded and duly carried: Orange for subordination of District's easement rights That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 90-85-5, approving an agreement with the County of Orange for subordination of District's easement rights in connection with construction of the South Coast Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-35. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:07 p.m. , July 11, 1990. -16- 07/11/90 DISTRICTS 6 7 8 14 Actions re Final upplement No. 1 to EIR for Pro osed Formation of District o. 14 and Reorganization of Districts 7 and 13 relative to Shan es re contract NOS. 14-1-1 1 -1-SB and 4-1-2 Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering reported that Supplement No. 1 addresses changes in the alignment of the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Contract Nos. 14-1-1A and 14-1-1B, and the Baker Force Mains, Contract No. 14-1-2; increases in pipe sizes from 78-inch to 90-inch and from 72-inch to 81-inch pipe to be consistant with new sewer design criteria included in the adopted 1989 Master Plan; and acquisition of the easements required for construction of said conveyance facilities. These projects begin at the Main Street Pump Station, located in the John Wayne Airport "clear zone" just north of Main Street. The Main Street Pump Station, and this project, will convey flow from the cities of Tustin and Irvine to the Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant. Between the pump station and Baker Street at Bristol Street, two 42-inch force mains (pressure lines) will be constructed under Contract No. 14-1-2, expected to start construction in a few months. An easement has been obtained from the County of Orange for the portion of the sewer to be constructed in the airport's Main Street parking lot. Between Bristol Street and Fairview Road, construction of an 81-inch gravity sewer is nearly complete under Contract No. 14-1-1B. This project includes the rebuilding of Baker Street for the City of Costa Mesa, under a cooperative reimbursement agreement. Because there were no problems with alignment on this phase and no easements were required, the project was approved by the Directors for construction. The final leg, Contract No. 14-1-IA, a 90-inch gravity sewer, extends from Fairview Road westerly in Baker to Deodor Avenue (one block west of Harbor) , where it turns north to Gisler Avenue. The first of three easements, within a private parking lot, is required in this Deodor Avenue leg. The parking lot serves a commercial building. The occupant of this property is opposed to construction within the parking lot, and has engaged an attorney to represent him. The attorney presented comments (after the close of the public comment period) which are addressed in the Final EIR document. The response gives reasons for the alignment choice, namely this alignment minimizes , traffic and homeowner disruption. The project then proceeds westerly in Gisler Avenue to the Santa Ana - River. Between the Greenville-Banning Channel (located on the east side of the Santa Ana River) and westerly side of the Costa Mesa bluff, the project is designed within the northerly boundary of the Mesa Verde Country Club golf course, requiring a second private easement. This golf course alignment out of the street right-of-way is necessary because the street is lower than the profile of the sewer conduit. The Mesa Verde Country Club has also engaged an attorney to present their _17_ � 07/11/90 opposition to construction on their golf course. The comments (received after the close of the comment period) were responded to in the Final EIR. This alignment will certainly impact the golf course, but minimizes disruption over other possible alignments, or the raising of Gisler Avenue's elevation. As stated in the Final EIR, loss of trees and shrubs will be mitigated by either replanting existing specimens or buying new specimens. After siphoning under the Greenville-Banning Channel , the alignment proceeds north in private right-of-way to the point where it enters the Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant. Acquisition of a third easement from Southern California Edison is required in the narrow area between the Santa Ana River and the Greenville-Banning Channel. Mr. Dawes advised that the Final Supplement No. 1 addresses all of the comments received on the Draft Supplement, including the objections of the property owners relative to the proposed alignment of Contract No. 14-1-1A requiring easements. Receive and file Staff Summary Moved, seconded and duly carried: Report That the Staff Summary Report dated July 3, 1990 re Supplement No. 1 to the Environmental Impact Report for Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of District Nos. 7 and 13 re Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Contract Nos. 14-1-1A and 14-1-18, and Baker Force Mains, Contract No. 14-1-2, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file written comments Moved, seconded and duly carried: received after t e pub c ear ng That the written comments received after the public hearing on March 14, 1990 (included in the Final Supplement No. 1) , be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive file and approve Final Moved, seconded and duly carried: upplement No. I to Environment_ Impact Report That the Final Supplement No. 1 to Environmental Impact Report for Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and . Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of District Nos. 7 and 13 re Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Contract Nos. 14-1-1A and 14-1-18, and Baker Force Mains, Contract No. 14-1-2, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors do hereby certify that said Final Supplement No. 1 to Environmental Impact Report has been completed in compliance with the State and Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended. Certifying Final Supplement No. 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: to Environmental Impact Report That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-86, certifying said Final Supplement No. 1 to Environmental Impact Report; making certain findings relating to `../ significant environmental effects identified in the Supplement; adopting a statement of overriding considerations; and authorizing the filing of a Notice of Determination re said projects. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -18- 07/11/90 DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:12 p.m., July 11, 1990. �. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 1 to the plans contract No. 7-11-1 and specifications for Abandonment of Lane Road Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-1, and Abandonment of Castlerock and Dow Avenue Pump Stations and Modifications to MacArthur Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-3, authorizing an addition of $27,913.00 to the contract with Colich 8 Sons (JV) for two items of additional work and granting a time extension of six calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin laps an specifications for ontract No. 7-13 That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 90-87-7, approving plans and specifications for Campus Relief Sewer, between Von Kansan Avenue and Jamboree Boulevard, Contract No. 7-13, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Agreement wit oun V of Orange re adjustment of manhole That the Board ofDirectors hereby covers and clean-outs on District adapts Resolution No. 90-88-7, sewers in conjunction with ount 's approving Agreement with County of 19 9- 0 street resurfacing program Orange, providing for the adjustment of manhole covers and clean-outs on District sewers in conjunction with the County's 1989-90 street resurfacing program in unincorporated County areas within District No. 7, and providing for payment of the actual cost of the manhole adjustment plus 10% for inspection and administrative costs for approximately 302 manholes, at a per-manhole unit cost not to exceed $220.00 nor be less than $155 per manhole; and for clean-outs, at a per-clean-out unit cost not to exceed $176.00 nor be less than $125.00 per clean-cut; and authorizing payment of required deposit of $66,968.00 for said work. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:12 p.m. , July 11, 1990. - DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:12 p.m. , July 11, 1990. Secretary, of the Boards of Directors of County- Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 -19- FUN( 9199 JT DIST WORM NG CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/30/90 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP93 A nTsTRL "E_D A Gr rnr NTY CLAIMS PAID 06/06/96 POSTING DATE 06/06/90 ' ABMANLNo. vrunne ___AtlOUNJ —➢PEGS TPT ION • 107234 A.M. BEST COMPANY $90.31 PUBLICATION r. n aTeury 107236 ADAMSON UNIFORM 8 EOUIP. 11.048.69 U. SUPPLIES v 1...37 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. S8 7E,121.05 CONSTRUCTION PI-34-2� . 6 anaTl ETG'RN nnx CEB'fM n v ACennYFNT .. n R 9.Aq107239 ALPHABAI $437.63 SPECIALTY USES ' 107240 ANERICAN AIR FILTER. INC. $1,333.14 NECNANICAL PARTS STyo P..TM 107212 'OECD INC. L/OR ANERICAN SEALS 15.640.62 GASKETS/FITTINGS 107243 AMCRICAR TECHNICAL SUPPLY $1,594.20 FILM 24• ANIYTFR - NINE L rABIF i... nR TT.PNONO yTSTPN CARTx ' 107245 ANIHONY.S NECH. L MACHINE, INC $1.533.31 PUMP PARTS ' 107246 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $7.760.03 NOTICES 6 08 ' 1G1247 APPLF ONF sl. • 107248 ARATEK SERVICES. INC. $446.26 UNIFORMS 2 107249 ARENS INDUSTRIES INC. $18t683. INSTRUMENT PARTS m25 ner. PsvTn • 107251 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $61.493.41 GRIT REMOVAL M.0.7-13-66 107252 BRY SAFETY L SUPPLY $1.646.68 SAFETY SUPPLIES ' X •' 107254 P.Y. BAROTTI AND ASSOC.0 $5AB62.50 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PI-34-2)PI-57 2 •• 107255 . BARTER iC1ENTIFIC PRODUCES 81,188.61 LAS SUPPLIER 19.91 NRr.NANTY!e1, PAPTn 107257 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS S634.11 OFFICE SUPPLIES -{ 107258 BON-A-RUES 1195.63 TRUCK PARTS )),I.➢n yeoPn n 187260 BRENNER-VICOLER E ASSOCci INC. AI70.73 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES M " 107261 SAINDERSON CORP.. $1,554,698.70 CONSTRUCTION J-10-2 _1117111 BROWN At CAlnurit L,238._98 1NR NEERINRx 107264 SBROWNTEVE L CALDWELL CONSULTING 455,84x.90 ENGINEERING SERVICED J-19 10]264 STEVE RUBALO CONSTRUCTION CO. iLR55,D43.1% CeHSTRUCTtON I4-1-IB 2RM 0nn nlxc wruv. Iur_ _ 2y9.2M vnRlaneTlnx 107266 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PAACTICE 1099.76 PUBLICATION v 107267 GARY S. STRECO $246.51 PETIT CASE REIMBURSEMENT w A0T26R rR COMPANY �2B 13 KALVER 107269 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH, INC. $2.699.82 LAS SUPPLIES 107270 CAL-PAC CHEMICAL CO., INC. 5106.90 CHEMICALS BEGIN AMR PARTS 107272 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION, INC $105.29 TRUCK PARTS 107273 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $85.00 GATE TIMER 121214 CALIURNIA_F1r ELATION _L14O3R.26_ —MECHANICA1 "P¢yTSg__ 107275 CAPITAL YESTUARD $222.69 MECHANICAL PARTS 107276 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS 11390.375.90 ENGINEERING SERVICE' J-.9,' ),PI-20 t\9.4• TRUM PARTS 107270 CENTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM T154.77 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 1 Oi 270 CENTURY SAFETY INST. L SUPP. 111.067.28 SAPETY SUr,LIES n FUND NO 9199 JT DIST HORNING CAPITAL PPOCESSING DATE 5/30191 PACE 2 REPORT NUMBER 043 rnUµXX-SAULZAIUR-D.1SI.R4C3 -OF .ORANGE-Z NI I CLAIMS PAID 06/06/90 POSTING DATE 06/06/90 7 AUApT Nn_ FES... •ROUNT DESCRIPJL N__ " 107280 CHEMICAL ABSTRACTS SERVICE 4170.DO SUBSCRIPTION 24 DRAFTING T PAIL 107283 tDALE"Ro"t RISTIAN STNUC.INC., 13.340.00 MECHANIC SERVICES J-7-4 107283 CHROME.CRANNSNAFTF i. $1.2P0.00 MECHANICAL PARTS 7." 107285 COAST INSUR NCE A 27.150..00 PROPERBRIICSRANCE 4.O.5- 107285 COAST INSURANCE AGENCY $327.150.00 CONSTRUCTION ION 2-1 k- M.0.3-9-90 ' 107286 tOLICN AND SONS 3240.792.30 CONSTRUCTION 2-1 1-3 " 307281 COMPUSERVE 312.60 COMPUTER SERVICES ' 107289 CONARDiS PHOTOGRAPHY. ' i212.80 PHOTOGRAPHY - n 101291 CONNELL G.N. PARTS / DIV. S63.14 TRUCK PARTS 107292 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. $7.943.98 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES no,_. RI UEPJUNTltl 107294 CONTROL DATA CORP. S171.37 INSTRUMEM PART 107295 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS HEST $124235.25 CONSULTING SERVICES P2-42 ENGINES H n q=LT_-A7 -m=A TJ j9A 107297 R. E. COULTER CRANE RENTAL $1,963.00 CRANE ROYAL 107295 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC S171.98 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES fTl' I lR uE'.ANI1- X 107300 CHEMPRO ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 31.13H.94 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES = 10T301 DIE.INSTRUMENTS 380.06 ELECTRIC PARS bOntmn, nrt TA FaAm panmimq TAR ¢pow.TP¢ 107303 DEZURIK AND/OR CS CO. $27.13 VALVE PARTS 107304 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $2,296.14 PRINTING mvlav¢ n" 107306 DORADO ENTERPRISESi INC; 31.323.69 PLANE' MAINTENANCE A REPAIRS ' , 107307 OUNKEL BROS. MAC" MOVING S930.00 SPACE RENT J-19 N .10-13SO nUNN fNWA NNR f11R R: Ai43.71 PAINT a1MC1¢14 197309 OVALS SALES $279.51 FITTINGS 107310 E.ASTMAN. INC. 41.6RR.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES IQ7311 W. H. FRERT CORP, NRTRIl"109 2-16-7 2-27 107312 ECOANALYSISi INC:. $10430.23 OCEAN RESEARCH 107313 ENCHANTER. INC. $7,000.08 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.3-14-90 ".-ImL 0I]..A3 IRGA49ERVIrn - nx20Rn 107315 FACILITIES SUPPORT CO. $604.20 TOOLS ' 107316 JOHN B. FALKENSTEIN P.E. $3,750.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-4.J-20 Sj.T • FILTER ' 107316 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $144.00 AIR PREIGBT 107319 FINANCIAL MODELING SPECIALISTS S260.00 SOFTWARE _1➢2320 FISCHER 3 PORTER to. _81.m..AL CH.ORINATIOB3ARTS ' 107321 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. 1194.54 U0 SUPPLIES ' 107322 FLAT S VERTICAL CONCRETE $130.25 CONCRETE CUTTING 02323 FLOW ITCH -ITn 1. .9 g,'RONRM PARTa ' 107324 FLUID HANDLING SYSTEMS 3130R - PUMP PARTS 107395 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $12.23 FILM • u FUND( 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING' DATE V30190 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 U-11 SAN-IAI'Dh' 4 STATUS-Of-ORANOE COUWTT CLAIMS PAID 06A06/90 POSIT DATE B6106190 ARRANT ... vF.... AMOUNT OESCelAIION. r ' 107326 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $8,512.92 WATER USEAGE F1,71.1 vur vnwRnon rn779.11 •NSTRU!@NT_SIIRPLIve 107328 FRANKLIN ELECTRONIC COMPUTER $294.19 OFFICE SUPPLIES 107329 .FREEWAY TRUCK PARTS $902.63 TRUCK PARTS W 1FI.16 LUMSERAXAROWARS 107331 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS $6,232.50 FIBERGLASS FABRICATION ' 107332 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,705.89 TELEPHONE SERVICES 0733 107339 GIERLICN-MITE NELLI lNG. - i161056.93 MECNANCIAL PARTSe ' 107335 GOOD HEART WILCOX CO. 67JITS BUILDING SUPPLIES 0IS3 ... ... ..... 107337 HIM DIESEL MACHINE 5587.56 TRUCK PARTS ' 107330 HACH COMPANY $320.56 LAB SUPPLIES 4153e HARRISJIOACOH .... 63 Cmr''ERSBRNIYALJISo..o 107340 XATCN II" INC. $106234.55 MXCRANICAL PARTS ° 101341 S. A. HEA AT 1123060129 CONSTRUCTION PI-35-1 I312 x{ruen ut1uT .1s T,nn rvU_EjIPIN9B 107343 HILT1. INC. :425.55 FITTINGS ' 107344 HOERRIGER C.V.S. CALIF. A INC. $173.31 COMPUTER PARTS iCAI. PARTS X " 107396 HOUSE OF BATTERIES 6I434917T BATT6RIkS S 107347 R.S. NU BXES CD.. INC. 03157 .36 SAFETY'SUPPLIBE tC 107349 HUNTINGTON SUPPLY $95.65 HAPDfM 101350 HUNTINGTON VALLEY TOOL 9247.39 TOOLS n " 107352 IMPERIAL VEST CHEMICAL $661�25A16 PeR61C COWIDE 11.0.II-06-89 ' 107353 INDUSTRIAL IAL SYSTEMS. INC. 66BS.05 ELECTRIC PARTS W u-WAR, Tvnl 9ro lel THREAOrn o6npUr.e SdoiljA MENSCInya 101355 INFILCO OEGREMONT. INC. 9411.53 MBCRANICAL PARTS '1 107356 INGRAM PAPER $4.284.95 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES laaT INTFRNATIAN.1 r'x S �{Nr- Baal-ec aurxe ' 107358 INTERNATIONAL SENSOR TECH. 114356.33 IN9TRUMRNT PARTS 107359 INTERNATIONAL TIME RECORDER O69.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT ..SD73fi0_ rRv3NF RARCLLJIAIER-D.etRrrr ---._3 LISOO.On __WATER_USZAD- 107361 JAYS CATERING $357.60 MEETING EXPENSE 107362 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $145.32 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES xea APETCE e1NDl TER 107364 KALLEEN•S COMPUTER SUPPLIES 12r53T.32 COMPUTER PARTS ' 107365 KAMAN BEARINGS G SUPPLY 1161420 FITTINGS 0.13fi6 KAMER rnMPANT _1631.2A COOLS 107367 THE KETTM COMPANIES $2.395.59 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-3565-36 10T768 MINKS. INC. S185.399.10 CONSTRUCTION 5-34-2 65 MrM.f M. 1 .191.12 WA$Tv n 107370 KIEV IT PACIFIC CO. $23.075.60 CONSTRUCTIONPPI-01 107371 KING REARING. INC. $4,779.73 MACHINE SUPPLIES h ' FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5130/91 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER IP43 f11.7eTTnu DI-S LLC3S-0E-ORAUGL-CDUM.IT _ CLAIMS PAID 06/06/90 POSTING DATE 06/06/94 RDADI Nn. VrunnR AMOUNT— merotvT rnx 107372 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES S3.054.93 TOOLS IAI• STItOCT20 ....C38-' --34,5 5 L - 107374 ETHEL GAS MA/JOHN L. KOSHR - $59.94 LIABILITY CLAIM 107375 LA MOTTE CHEMICAL PRODUCTS $110.29 CHEMICALS SL3.]4 NP.,I.. ¢Y 107377 M.V. LAWMASTER 6 CO.. INC. S7.246.26 SOIL TESTING P ' 1073TS LEADER PARTNERSHIP $133.400.00 CONNECTION PEE REFUND 9 2. 107360 LEE A NO CONSULTING CHUB, $26.943.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-33 107361 LEEDS 6 NORTHRUP $261.00 INSTRUMENTS PART rruavvrxn AvovmeA T_t 5 : 107393 LE ROY' CRANDALL 1 ASSOC. 1689.50 CEOTEWNICAL SBRVICES ' 107384 LIMITORQUE CORP. $1,081.00 MECHANICAL PARTS RTC I.In 107386 K.P. LINDSTROM, INC. A6i335.22 CONSULTING SERVICES - SIR G MASTER PLAN 107387 LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION 1293A540.00 POOLED EMISSIONS EST19AT18' PROGRAM M.0.12-13-89 •' ,107389 NBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $2,041.45 OCEAN MONITORING 107390 MPS 1311.70 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES CHAEIi.:`SHIM PC X 107392 MALCOLM PIANIE INC. S15.I60.22 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.O.1-1R-89 2 10T393 MARVAC ELECTRONICS R151.n INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES N 35A - xATT . rut OM: .ue. ac WAR-,g, BIGEANIrit. PARTS 117395 MCMAHAN DESK INC. $133.98 PILING CABINETS --M $ 207396 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. S906.31 TOOLS Ei—RP TNRT$IMrtBY RRPATRA ]? ` 107398 METER CRAFT INC. - 107.24 - SLECTRIC REPAIRS 147399 MICROAGE COMPUTER - 1891.8E OPPICE EQUIPMENT , FT DOTER RAqlr 4,S 66.19 COMMEBSOPTNARP ' 147401 MICA INDUSTRIES. INC. S7.76R.00 CONTRACT SERVICES J-7-4 107402 SERPENTIK AND/ $3.568.36 MECHANICAL PARTS D.7M TAR CERYICIC ' 107404 MORGAN CRANE CO.. INC. 1310.51 TRUCK PARTS ' 107905 N4 TIONAL ACADEMY OF. SCIENCES $337.91 PUBLICATION 1➢ISDb NA TIDN4M INFORMATION DATA CIE. 133.4% PUBLICATION_ ° 107407 NATIONAL LUMBER $381.14 HARDWARE ' 19790E NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES. INC. 911,712.64 CONSTRUCTION 5-37-2 '_ID.1SD^ uetrnuu AeFrn rnnurn aR5D.10 RRMTRATION 107410 OUST K. NEWBERG CONST. CO. $2.118,932.10 CONSTRUCTION PI-33 107411 NEWPORT ELECTRONICS $66.39 INSTRUMENT REPAIR 07412 CH ARLES NICHOLS _ SM.Z2 MEETIUG-STPENSR • 107413 NORTH SUPPLY $281.73 COMOMUNICATION PARTS ' 107914 FRED 0•BRIEN $372.25 MEETING EXPENSE 107415 FF s1•419.25 n....v PC... A. • 107416 - OX STEVENS CO: 589.240.03 CHLORINS M.0.2-14-90 107417 ORANGE BEARING, INC. 0147.30 MECHANICAL PARTS n NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/30/90 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 UwTr ¢Amt7eTtnN nt¢T9.ILLSJIFaRANTJIOUNT. CLAIMS PAID 06/06/90 POSTING DATE A6106/90 } 'ARRANT wD. of anno can UNT nr¢[otoTtnN ' 307418 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY $201.8R ELEMIC SUPPLIES A]n4.79 *BUCR-PARTS fTS f41420 - ORANGE COUNTY YHEMICA Co. 1930.39 HYDROCHLORIC ACID 107421 -ORANGE VALVE G. FITTING CO. $2.021.47 FITTINGS FRvtrtr .124-e1 SRECIALOR-CAe.R.R ° 107423 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT S9.312.52 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE ' 107424 PSOC(POOL SUPPLY OF D.C.) 170.92 BUILDING MATERIALS PART. —IN STRLRBAIT RNPAlN 107426 PACIFIC SAFETY EGUIPNENT CO:. 1905.23 SAFETY SUPPLIES 107427 PACIFIC BELL ' 1741.47 TELEPHONE SERVICES u2.uu RlEMN8_20LR-AO MON"IST-2 ° 107429 PHOTO 6 SOUND CO. $164.15 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 107430 PIMA SRO SYSTEMS. INC. $43,962.95 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88 31A WE.., 107432 PGLVPUREs 1NCA - '11.238.31 POLYMM M.0.1-10 00.8-9-89 107433 PONTON INDUSTRIESI INC. $692.35 INSTRUMENT 1_.1 IDLE etmin?Ir4 I [ 107435 POWER SYSTEMS $972.00 ENGINE REPAIR 107436 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE %36.D0 ICE fT 8 X 107439 PULSAFE EOER 31.425.73 MECBMICAL.PARTS Z 107939 R.B.P. ASSOCIATES .1.700.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES - CONSTRUCTION INSPEC. CTRlr, O R .Rvem EO = 107441 RECTC. INC. S38.380.00 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88 - ^ 107442 RED WING SHOES $352.63 SAFETY SHOES rTRrn NP*vo n ' 101444 REMEDY TEMP $423.84 TEMPORARY SERVICES 107445 THE.REP UOL I C SUPPLY CO♦ 1151.58 FITTINGS A rnORo¢ _ 107447 RICHARDS. WATSON S GERSNON $3.521.46 LEGAL SERVICES 5-L-86 107448 J. R. ROBERTS CORP. :5,183.64 CONSTRUCTION J-7-4 FR7$ t390.049-D5 ITHST¢II(T]nM l�l] 147450 J. R. ROBERTS S201.773.65 CONSTRUCTION ]-20 107451 ROBINSON FERTILIZER CO. 11,043.00 CREMICALE 1074N2 RONAN FNGINEERING CO. 12T 9.RR INSTRUMENT S¢"PTTR¢ 107453 ROTANIUM PRODUCTS CO. $1.430.09 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES ' 107454 RUSSELECTRIC $130.50 ELECTRIC PART v 187456 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. 166.40 PARTS MUNCH 107457 SANCON ENGINEERING . INC. S2.100.60 MANHOLE COVER REPLACEMENT 1D2R5R SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS R355.]l Rt RCTRTr. NRTRR 107459 SCHULER ENGINEERING CORP. $171.792.02 CONSTRUCTION PI-27-162 207460 SCMULT2 NECH. CONTRACTORS. INC 11.756.00 MECRANICAL PARTS we nR2TCR vnoarTnve 107462 SEAL ENGINEERING CO. $217.30 PEE PARTS 107463 SHAMROCK SUPPLY 1169.09 HECNAOICAL PARTS fi FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/50/90 PAGE 6 ( REPORT NUMBER AP43 CLAIMS PAID 06/06/90 POSTING DATE 06/06/90 ° 107464 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $1.555.50 PHYSICAL STAKE ° PRESENTATION AIDS - ° 10T4AA SMITN-EMI':RY'Cdd 115 i242t00 BOIL TESTINGH.0.6-IA-08 107467 SOFT NAeEHBWRE $73:3/ COMPUTER PARTS 502i +ee c if n.a-. .4 107469 SOLAR TURBINES INTERNATIONAL 3449.16 GENERATOR REPAIR 107470 30. COAST AIR QUALITY 39.001.00 APPLICATION FEES TRUCK PARTS t ' 107472. SOUT14EPN CALIF. EDISON CO t108.533.79 - POWER 101473 SOUTHERN COUNTIE OIL CO. }' ;.y STS 3.9E DI698Ir PIIEL ft ^.RINO 48RV3CES 7 ID 182 PI-13 P2-37 ° 107475 WESTALLOY INC. S1r625.35 WELDING SUPPLIES 107476 STAR TOOL 6 SUPPLY CO. 31.414.50 TOOLS 107478- SUNSET FORD npve y ' '¢"i l9.BR "'1"' HMR if SIIBPL189 TROCR PARTS 107479 SUPER CH[M CORP 'S.i� 'r 31 N97a66 r c5m1IGALs °1 107481 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL. INC. o- $21.061.03 HARDWARE 107482 TCN ASSOCIATES 3392.40 LAB SUPPLIES 2 ° 1107484 TRANS 0i905 - IRA VtCR TR An EL BSI' .k 3506.00 ¢7 -' GO!@DPRR 00Pl1IAR8 ` 1( , ,• v �, }11BBDYGB �y:�,_ TMVeL:SBRVICkB H.OtA-I4-09 = 1674ST J.G. TUCKER 6 SON. INC. $637.56 INSTRUMENT PARTS —I - 107488 TWINING LABORATORIES OF 3909.DO SOIL TESTING N.0.6-14-89 n " 107490 "UNIDM S}6N CO. lBTS.49 ` SIGNS.".- CO 107491 UNIUB,TES PAR107492 IF,CELIMP SERY C ; "-,: SI3744T PARCEL:SERVICES ^ 107493 UPJOHN HEALTHCARE SERVICES $136.00 CPR MINING i1 107494 VWR SCIENTIFIC $4.243.75 LAB SUPPLIES 1 107495 MIN Till" 107496 WALL EY CIT ER. SUPPLY Cb 15.992.8E ' FITTINGS 107991 V28LLET DE TESTY DIRGE 392.15 TRUCK PARTS MRIGS9GMvvwum _ iA. ^°Cj73.P'um ° 107499 VEHICLE SPRING SERVICE $319.06 SPRING REPAIR 107500 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $1,721.80 SAFETY SUPPLIES ' 107502 CARL WARREN A CO. 100E:39 INBUPAIICB CLAIM ADMINISTRATOR `- 107503 -WATER POLLUTION CONTROL $301,50 PUBLICATION 107505 WESTERN PACIFIC EQUIPMENT CO. 3458.79 TRUCK PARTS ' 107506 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY $51,690.35 CAUSTIC SODA H.0.0-9-89 107508 WORDPERFECT CORP. $166.13° - COMPUTER SOFTWARE 107569 SEROS CORP. ;1 i2$0339 COPIES LEASES FUN( 9199 JT DIS7 WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/30/90 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 -SAP-AID 06106/90 POSTING DATE 06/ 619 CLAIMS PAID 06/06/90 POSTING PATE 06/06/90 " I„10. __ "•GLINT nreCPl^T10�' ' 107510 2IEBARTN AND ALPEP 3715,11T.00 CONS7RUCTION PI-34-1 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 06/06/90 $10,811#302.57 SUMMARY AMOUNT 02 OPSR FUND 3,769.59 I. 02 CAP PAC FIRM) 214,147.26 pa n W PAC Spero 14 ODO.06 05 OPBR FUBD ,�,6oi.76 07 OPEN PUNO 5,405.69 97 CAP PAC FUND 549,298.25 F y. XF1667 P PAC POND 'et `T%P PAC POND AAP PAC FUND 12,661:64 PRR FUND 1,977.49 e v . l J��'...}r,.' -I^- 3l,15l00ILING CAPITAL FUND 116,375.26 9 FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/13/90 PAGE I REPORT NUMBER APA3 YMI Y.--AN17 A:","-D4ST44CT""RANGE-CO_NTT• OLAiNs,0AIB 06/20/90 POSTIRG DATE 06/20/90 ARBANLJIG- •ENO01L - A6OUN1 ^b9CM P#TAb 107535 A 0 S INDUSTRIES S1.694.06 TOOL BOA MODIFICATION p;5}t ABr eAru. em mrye BEBYICE f400 80 ASPeALT STRIPING a 107537 AIR PRODUCTS 6 CHENIKAL,INCA S15i296.00 BKYGEN CBN SYSTEM b6M AGRSFL3ENT M 0 8 44 / 0 107538 LEASING ASSOC UTES/ALL5T0TE lli T31s32 AUIU LEASES _ S• •I l ien SIIPOLY In- tSB0:9* CHLORINATION PART1 '^ 297540 ALLYASTE SERVICES $2.430.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICE 107541 ALTA SALES. INC. $141:79 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 41 AMEBI 44.so SRNQFPARTS 107543 ROBED INC. iAOR A"ERIOAN SEALB'> S35bL�4 1 88AL8 6 CASKETS �y4E T yr 107544 1 AMEp i�CAN TEINNIDAL SUPPIV 91i039i34 I - CAi�KA6 *' S 4% 1 Axrx 4ECb. 40Z.J6 �" e.. eOS 107546 ANACOMP $177.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES 107547 ANIXTER - WIRE 6 CABLE 9185.70 -" " COMMUNICATIONS CABLE 107549 `(AP00 VALVE b PRIMER CORP `v =t' Vi336T4�w' xP�' "'� FI1'TINN9 �t k•. �s 10T55n .' AP6LE ONE ' iii"is xmGFGRART sER4fO§ AM 19fu 117552 AN IZONA INSTRUMENTS CORP. i63.00 MENTAL EQUIPlBNT 117553 ASSOCIATED SOILS IN GIN EERINO S655.Be SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89 m MEETING 8N8 x x 1o75ss AUTOMOTIVE.ERUIOI sEAi(T * s67`a 50 s>ti `+ ' ' ,TAUGKP i0 x x iO�@s6 i BC INDU$TpIAL=WOLri [Nc :� A3gBr6 ° , r`�„ ; afire- 107558 y BANK OF AMERICA-C.A.S.C. f14•51 BOND 6 COOPON COLLECTION - 327559 P.Y. BAROTTI AND ASSOC. $4,812.50 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES P1-34-2.P2-37 5A0 B BATERAu ENiIEIO ER OOUC75 c_PO r 8P8RP8O-COI¢-DISTPIBtRION Eo ACT 56! BAXTER SCI S!}i9e0T.'SS2 s1 a �6 OFFICE BUPPLIzS LA¢ 9i1PPLIe6 F, 107562 BA4ESS SIATIONEIIS .j ii739 '7 ° " ' Inns, RnRtit xEiNiyti 1 P1N Oo AMf.I. A$ o� :. :x, v eNatlt 47 A FS,�' }�b, '*Tvk- _yClygy6rNO 9ANVIPP9 SRS 80 47 Vi : 107564 BENZ ENGINEERING. INC. f1.015.56 MECHANICAL PARTS 117565 BLACK BOX CORP $803.01 COMPUTER HARDWARE I rvlue .ZOt-DP Oeeepaeacol�OlsralelrslRM 107567 < soisA RADIATOR SERVICE fE49.88 ' RADIATOR REPAIR IBISES BON-A-RUES fi36i56 - TRUCK PARTS 569 "RROMU_L.SALIlWnl COUSIN TINA - }4[6-.9.t eNG7MeBRINOSgUV1':PA. tj 3J .d 70 107570 BUILDING NEWS, INC. $253.30 PUBLICATION 107571 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES. INC. f8T0.00 SURVEYING SERVICLS RES 88-71 O2E12 RAN, r.. STOEED_ 1,0131 ct rnax uv1Ne m..m .NccT •' 107573 CPT CORP. / SUMMIT SOLUTIONS 5864.48 OFFICE SUPPLIES 107574 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCHI INC. S96.89 LAB 8IFLI83 • 107S79 •ALTHOL_A_INCc 011596,31 TNAT. 107576 CALIF. ASSOC. OF SANITATION f440.00 MEETING EXPENSE M.0.6-14-89 1075" CAPITAL WESTWARD $2.700.29 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES B xxnu y ATIONS gysrrm 107579 CENTRUM NORTH PNA SE 1I ihi114.00 .' REFUND CONNBCTIONF86 107580 CHALLENGE BEARING B IND. SPLV S/42.33 NECSANICAL SUPPLIES F( NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/I3/90 PAGE 2( REPORT NUMBER AP93 COU IT SANI-UT1ON DISTRICT$ OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06/20/90 POSTING DAIS 0612019D 5 WARRANT NO, VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION u'� 3� 107581 YARDLEY INSTRUMENTS $223.16 + INSTRUMENT PARTS 1 CM 26 vn Am lxv/nn c n 107503 CHURCH ENSINEERIN0I INC, $ 1i27.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES:7-f8 5r+s }G�S88 CORINNCOE CLAWSA�t3 $ BaE{ ;i < YtfCO+nkRRYYPNAk SERVICES:J-jN AN 107586 CLEMENT COMMUNICATIONS. INC. $54.73 SAFETY SUPPLIES 71 107567 CLOW S CLOW, INC. $4.313.00 REFUND CONNECTION PEE MECHANICAL PARTS. 107589 -COMPRESSOR COMPONEN;S OF CALiF $2a096+26 1 t P hr;, iuSegAHp'aAl. PERT$ 197590 CON N ELL B:Ni PARTS Div* 33811114" jI +'s TRUCK PARTS ) u ". • ': ^-= ' S+62 . r7 v.enMAtO A F.ikA 107592 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO $1.910.91 / CHLORINE H.0.10-11-87 101593 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS $785.91 BLUEPRINTING M.O.1-10-90 07590 • pp i,aloft107396 %y£ ,ti b$7KOL E8I ARiDp YN L I T / ' LY�2'I 11}1§a 3,$. �A { IfflIll �s tRUCR�lwsftUNA6NTRT 68dAI�P'Mt�'j t07di}YI r'{. P.t{. '2 .. e .krt ¢"a• 107598 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $1.655.60 '. ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 107599 CAL WATER f201.00 RENTAL EQVIPIBRT m 107604 i "�` °�` s �' 4cx,'h'4 Y20+007 °'=POBLttlATION / `- 'x 'V i 176D2 ,G�;1, AfE F OALi�o$Nix' '+�pp ,�"+ 'ti { •5 11so obi `t i$d$;p§bb$kd£kP I'�'in ? ` AIL .e'cI ir,.,.�'_ rAA �i. �` u a 307609 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE $1.875.89 TRUCK TIRES 107605 DE ANZA CORPORATION $150.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL oa 1R76D Ftu PO ASSDCIAT� 10769e. �`bi60tl RtNt C6HPANN 107610 DON JOSE 07 f27B.T5 BBF11N0 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 107611 JOSEPH S. OUOOR. P.E. $900.00 "-' ENGINEERING SERVICES BROS. MACH 117613 >. OUNN -ESSAROS,COpPa } 09 6,:� PAINT BUpPLlER 1 d7611 EMA SE0.YICC${ INCY $ �A583.9T I 'tMR$R1M0 8$RViDE9 l 21-1 0 SOi + y A"TrR AOPPftRA 107616 ECOANALYSTS. INC. $1.794.87 OCEAN RESEARCH 107617 ECOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING 0 ANALY $5.3T5.00 DOW RESEARCH 7610 E YIRO M N A 0 C 107619 FST SANG ANO JAVELYa NC+ fYe9i 91" BUILDING MATERIALS {'! 107620 FACILITIES SUPPORT.COI $13.3R SHALL HARDWARE D 6E MARS9 LLIFAMPES $1156,20PeRRyn COIR otarA?SNrtnR 107622 JOHN E. FALNENSTEIN P.E. f3.637.50 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 1-7-4. J-20.J-17 107623 FEOC RA L EMPRESS CORP. $2a1.50 AIR FREIGHT I a 7621 QfAWK 07625 FILTER SUPPLY CO. " - S316+19 CHLORINATION PARTS 107626 FISCHER $ PORTER CC, f31301+86 INSTRUMENT PARTS 4 FUND NO 9199 JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/13/90 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP93 ' COUNIX SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06/20198 POSTING GATE ,06/E0/90 WARRANT NO, VENDOR- lAnt MY DERCRIPITO ',A 107627 FLUID TECH $1,685.19 MECHANICAL PARTS f 107629 TDUNTAIN VALLEY tANERA $342,31 .FILM 101630 } FOUNTAIN VALL ET PAINT 6TON.33 PAiMx BUPLTEE P 107632 A.F. FRET slos.00 DNPRRR COMP DISTRIBUTION 107633 CITY OF FULLERTON $52.90 WATER GREASE 107635 -tSEMERAL TELEPHONE CO S,� . A6i217192 '�3 + T8L8Pt8NN_9Ew 1 107636 '"%rdtoedE_Lk` .dN l AE39e jE9 "fit` 'r sAg9YTb + ns" ;I, iNNiRYMtXT N „v 107638 'GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION $800.00 STREET SWEEPING SERVICES 107639 GREENVIEW DATA. INC. AT2.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 1}T6A1 ' '- NA9NAN PUMP Ed , P., 'r �` s/ Kew 126TY1 ,W i,k3, Pump PAIN SQT692 5'F vPREO gRAN 1.,HARPEN ..''"- lg All}9Si00 "� n DBP$RRBII iblR-DIBT'FS9dT10N sx.. r _ 7}, 1076A9 HAN CROS CHEMICALS INC. ^$156.00 LAB SUPPLIES 107645 MATCH L KIRK. INC. $616.25 MECHANICAL PARTS m . [0766T UWAy SAFETY NENfA} ;tN {3 c: ' - }Q{{99 :0 a TwNSTRUDTldN 91pppp AtI '*``,v; ir. D3NALo Ba_HONORidMC �_ 'ASd LQ ",r'DRFBRxEUtl£A' OT6AB � ':. ^3• Z .� 37#,1 y to 107650 HOUSE OF BATTERIES $ 7A5.31 RTTRLES 107651 R.S. NU GOES CO.. INC. 61.786.08 PAINT SUPPLIES bo 107653 ;?INOUSiRIAi. irAEAREO PRODUCTS `3y{ '^- 921i 23�.3u =^rN>'. Sk'1 'i1fNNeC�Iddtd + k"�E' 3 ' '" I � 107651 *IbFlLC0dE6RE NOH { 1]iCi .. t}iS i99 ".+'"' IY9;dNfi •"V`ki #-,�',�4w na 1y- -W :_v ..A t t, e Y x . . it, 107656 .. INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $212.99 TRUCK PARTS 107657 INTERNATIONAL SENSOR TECH. $90.73 INSTRUOMY 107659 ,.-;6REA T'.UESTERN SANITARY SUPPA +' SSTOi66 }'`'� JANITORIAL SUPPLM a � 107660 ° . JAY'S LAYERING - t,M1 4316.25 �Osb +� N89TINC {PRHBsq.i-; S iRWNENTK CO. '-A90N.B4 ii'. . irNlia 207662 JENSEN TOOLS 6 ALLOTS $814.17 INSTRUMENT/TOOLS - 107663 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $585.07 ELECTRIC PARTS '.107665 c' KANAN BEARINGS L S"NUIERU P SbOiBV IT OR 0 '° 107666 KANEP COMPANY l0T5:68 + + t00L$ ti. .� LOT AHIBA 59F12 veP11Nn NaAA iRA 6vvRblvxlfm 107668 RAS SAFETY PRODUCTS $30.76 SAEBTT SUOR 107669 KELLEY BLUE BOOK 517.00 POBLICATION 107671 MARTIN KORDICKi SR : . 32i2S Ni 00 CONSTROCTION smicsB 4 1 It13 16 iT9 107672 H.V. .LAWNASTER 4 CO., INC. $550.00 80IL TNSTINO N.O,d lb 80 y�3 ■ NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING OATS 6/13/90 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNT .'T.T.n n+erR.rr�UF�flIN6 CLAIMS PAID 0612b/90 POSTING DATE 06/9"96 z `L llAui xn_ vENDOfl - Itlnuui n ' 107673 JUDY LEE $84.15 MILEAGE MUSE [DSO_ MnRT.. P [q43-ns IU-IBOMB! 107675 :LE ROY CRANDALL A ASSOC. 14,660.98 ENGINEERING sawchS �d' ,IeIs ' 157676 LOCAL AGENCY $250.06 LAFCO THE y1 S'hT °�' a..T ._TVAAPhIG_AaR6lrrd: 117678 M-T-M $2,145.32 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 117679 MACOMCO $167.20 SERVICE AGREEMENT 07[11e N!1[DLl_PTaN+r . INC. inCE 107681 MARSMAL4 MAINT. PRODUCTIONa SAFelx VIDEO 9 .�:`i"L .+ �y♦� ^ �;? ' • 1076B2 :..h ANVAC ELECTRONIC ;5 1T �i VA t t 1NSTBVNRH'2 S6MPI. ,y w *",�t• AA1Na ,i^ K ..BtkA..�uc . .,, A tA, 107684 MCX ASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. Slia.34 MECHANICAL PASTS 107685 MEASUREMENT CONTROL STS. INC. $316.63 FITTINGS lot, 9 fo76e7 , IEA OI�DE E6NPVIEN YV a 'T; 1• _w nnrd 166T A46 g 1+ pq¢u1'Rh pextD y 'Nr S�SO ` r1 ... y} "' iDIfi a ' ixF,S�iPEtV°APPAiA� � � 0 yam, z i i� 6 ♦ 6 f 6nrsTe A"pL HA + uy T + 107690 MORION SALT AND/OR $440.45 BALE 107691 MOTION INDUSTRIES. INC. $110.16 MECHANICAL PARTS DRDL0.ti IN m i676sa '"' IIiMOTOROLA CEUULAN G� qq {�1L. � Y • sW"wRr' a ,y x (:. 1 iGTR94 I a�5:NEC ' ' j3 iic,s'+��t �Lj� ` aI U' e�" x4 jjS0�442 a :. yy 67EioAe�p ''5�5'E+_ Z '-.iu x . P s"titi�k.ea .Jk e ale Awrv�'$ a 96('N�[i _., :6.��i1'Ti'YAtA.A6.eUeR l{Slxvti a*f •"• 0 107696 NATIONAL INFORMATION DATA CTR. fS3.4S PUBLICATION E Y.. 1 107697 NATIONAL LUMBER $100.62 HAROIIARe - 1117,911AL�ulLacVACUUM 107699 CITY 01 NEWPbRT BE GNP'// `' S`"• 4 e (N`S'.- " W NATBR Ug9 { 1077aq OA N•S./80LAG'DISPOSA GO 7 , '/ z3 ` 1 16Ai:t � " RASH Bap' 'ry ;ii4 ' r 0T7e+ nrr OIr InR ., + t ;.r 1 S -:. 4'.ta ff NA 107702 OR SYSTEMS CO. S4B♦207.70 CHLORINE N.O.2-14-90 107703 ORANGE BEAPIN6+ INC. $563.85 HARDWARE 1077 OI07 TSIEDCRIN O100 pARlltB 7` y d rTJ' 01 OLnirarN arivjtr AuA @ m .•. � + ':'ie?, , 1O1708 COUNTY OF ORANGE 510.522.01 SERVICE AGREEMENTS - MID EQUIPMENT 107709 OUN CTY SAN17ATIIN DISTRICT $6,669.96 REIMBURSE WORKERS COIF INSURANCE '12Op1_Suom r nr n.r_+ •+�,q3o_• 107711 PACIFIC PARTS :. SIi100.00 BT. IID, RTAT 101712 PACIFLCRSIFET 60.� AliY4 BAPTAVihB 7131HIL #0 r d I+mP s- i t 0. 107714 PALLETS A ACCESSORIES CO. $1.519.55 PALLETS ( • 107715 PEACMTREE BUSINESS FORMS 978.00 PASSING TAGS - IIETIER A JONL-AIDIi1T ROY FENDER DRAFT A445410 D6PeflRRD CONt O16TRIBU'[tOR ' imis PHOTO A SOUND COI - $266.25 RENTAL EQUIPENI' Ytt x� S' �70111 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PRDCESSING DATE 6/13/90 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 OUDITT_-SANITATION I""ICTA0E—DRAUGE rm Ny. CLAIMS PAID 06/20/90 . POSTING DATE 06/20/90 u - VIBRANT xn. vENDep AMOUNT M•P71 off r ` 107719 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS. INC. 143,607.15 SLUDGE REMOVAL H.0.5-11-88 IATZ'h PI AT NS-,_TNLEy1W6_MAR -,-G f2k 6.24 r, 1y77R1 POLY PURE. INC. $1 036241E POLYMER M.Od-}0-90 B 9 B9 idi 107122 '. PREFERRED.,PAYING COI; }N C� T2,500.00 ASPHALT PA41NO r ifr 41i n 107724 THE PROJECTS SOLUTION CO. $3.975.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.8-10-88 107725 PROMAC U.S.A., INC. $102.13 MACHINE REPAIR 968-n1 mpeg s-u 10172T RECYC• INC, 020.00 SLUDGE NEIo9A1 H.D S }} B§ . .y 187728 RED WINO SHOES - 5101:96x . + SAYB'I� 8H0E8 7. OiT29 o,A_ Re' ,s OI$2DA31 .8 In livmen . .y 101730 THE REGISTER $1.022.09 NOTICES 6 ADS 107731 REMOTE METER RESETTING SYSTEM $30000.00 POSTAGE 3, IMF orouYl it eN '• 107733 NOACH WATER 7ECHNOLOBVi INC3 7 ` " • 113 72 , + ',I OAL PNRTb 107734 J4 Ri SOB ERi x' z sioii 7.T}i00 8 ' .�""A • ;CONB'YRUOYIOH 0-} r �s. A,�;" 6 M135.*r.,.41.•V, .' fNAtrrmNTnie k . a•v,� v r. n. 107736 S R J CHEVROLET $31.91 TRUCK PARTS t 107737 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. $132.80 PARTS CLEANER X ' 107739 „ §ANTI ANA WA ERSHFIJ,MRUJECT f{y" 3 04260:00 k uhl 'I�l ,. R2PUND USE§ P8§ Oy�A �. 1 8 s ' 10774P SCIENCE APPL�CATION$'i N7 iL -e Ir " 667 650dB $ n At OCEAN BAZIPLINO N.O16-14 rsss .fi G M 107742 CITY OF SEAL BEACH • ,.rya„1 f123.50 . dR.4. 1 - W�. S vr. s;' sw,� ATER USEAGE —I - 101743 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $702.30 HARDWARE 1077 cMiLL-EM[xr rn •c�S09� 10779E SMITH PIPE A SUPPLYi iNC '• s' 1 f339a 06 t�i,,+-, PLUMBING BDPlPL}8S U7 107796 §NAP•OM TOOLS COR Pi $103A6A TOOL. yr ?"Y s 7 cool uAHE1100SF rt i.y',4(SA „x-+ . _inJPertlR Antrrh�Nb' •m �.., 107748 SOIL AND TESTING ENGINEERS $293.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.6-14-89 107749 SOLAR TURBINES INC. 1804.28 GENERATOR WATER 0 R,,TNFRN rAj n. $26.399..4 onpnn 107751 S0. CAL, GAS CO. fAi313a6 l .RATUAAt 107752 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL C04 f9{623iO4 DIESEL FUEL '1 51 SPACESAVFR SY STLMSA Ixr. Audi9n DPPME.%BOrInMAP 107754 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER f6.75 WATER DISPENSER 147755 STAMEN Z. SPASSOFF, P.E. 94.320.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-1.J-19-2 2256_ STAR TOOLA-S UPPI V tn. SPJ.9b-a9 TMLR 107757 STEINY AND COMPANY# INC, f1.450i06 SAFETY REPAIR§ "=F 10775E STERLING ART f154.f9 GAABfC'9UPPLTES 10I259 SUN-BELLLANDSCAPF I MAINT, —_A34841.nn 90NTRACT'DROUNDSE26INO 1f.0.0-9 SiL 107760 SUPELCO, INC. $110.28 CHEMICALS 107761 SUPER CHEM CORP $1.498.12 CHEMICALS 62 rnNTINFNi AI Alp Tnel . IMP- <L.101.01 TVMIIR 107763 J4 WAYNE SYLVESTER ` 1441A2B MEBTINO EXPENSE 107764 TAYLOR-DUNN $302.61 ELICTRIG CART PARTS 'y ' � N f, •�t3' ` I NO 9199 JT GIST VORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING 'DATE 6/15/90 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 I7lTION DISLRICTR RF ABM CL AID 06/20/90 POSTING DATE 01120191 "uE: y„�.�, ' WARRANT No, VENDDA AMDNMT DESCR 114ION • 307765 TECH SCIENCE $325.54 MECHANICAL PARTS • 107767 TELEDYNE' MONARCH 0 AUBBER S551H7 7RBCR'PARTS 'Kk r • 107768 THERMO ANALYTICALI INC./NORCAL S190;00 LAB 9BRYIGB9 .. i2ARII8ibD TRAOL AFibi'.4 107770 TRUCK S AUTO SUPPLY. INC. $817.47 TRUCK PARTS 71 107771 TWINING LABORATORIES OF $4.438.00 SOIL:TESTING H.0.6-16-69 2. 107772 TYPE FACTORY PRINTING 107713 :NNOI:AL �" 1272186 . x UNL§ABSO cAeDLFBe 1 n 161774 '`dxlMorAL:eMEMfcAI ` 3<Jr «F �i2i56b:5` 5y u9ER eaa o Yx ` '+'i r NI t &VICE strok4 107776 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $132.95 PARCEL SERVICES 107777 MILLAR ELEVATOR COMPANY S326.15 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 107770 .`YWR SCIENTIFIC— ''i� * d= : 56086650 +'',' v LA0 9veetlE9 1077H0 VALLE OqI $ BUPPl1} 1.'BR 'UI ., .I ,, j072:5 ,:� FIPSP17TIROS Ilk atitaw A91 INm 107782 WALTER$ WHOLESALE ELECTRIC S294.03 * ELECTRIC SUPPLIES n 107783 'OHM R. NAPLES $533.75 ODOR CONTROL CONSULTANT X 107785 .WESTERN STAIT CyE"( AL SU PILi� I . i''>t" i§¢1+:. 0+c k " CAU01'IO SODA b O,b..0- 9 `raw&,Y x r 107766 `:uULOA� AB'$Dl IATEB nr,-s 'v l:� ?s di§ 6i:3 SbGIMSHRINa ssil7l$Ee y s4nY`*/#f CU 'I 7788 WOODRUF 2 LE 9ERVICEI M.0:6-4-89 77 NOERS 5248.0010 REML REFUND LAPCU PEE SEPROt TA 167792 YERE17 i�Y6RRC0OAAN 107794 CHARLES E. SYLVIA S954.00 DIRECTORS COUP --------------- TOTAL CLAIMS Pilo OB/2bI9b iU zszm ___a__z�a F z t � `'}ro' Ft ��EwX d •. _ 4" 32` L_ POND DO 9199 - 3T OIST ROBING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/13/90 PAGE 7 REPORT SUNDER M43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY MAINSPOSTING TE 06/20/90 f M1 � • `Pr dyN.t3•`� �x ( • E MHART ANOINT • 64.19 - 02 OPER FUND 8.765.13 r • 02 CAP FAC FUND 14,889.11 1' vv' ':' iv x•{: IN "N'S2, 0. 03 CAP FAC POND 22,556.07 05 OPER "" 5.342.50 FAC FORD 06 OPER POND 118J 25 n u �G n 17OVERFUND . ',} . :,, Oi90S3 -< rt v` `�• ".. .'+� a.z'1 ,ri>` .4 ,^.� 'ld ill OPEN FOND 6.462.56 114 OPER FUND 687.25 CAP FA Issb oeSO gstt �'- i•6i� 32 "t ,+ jb:`� �.. , t intlY, r• ' 77614 OPER FUND m+.x { d. 4 d ({0 tr3 ..-� i : i1 "+• rye m�w6+ ( » CORP - 331.418.17 m SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FUND 9,006.36 x �}313{ 3 bo ^ bU .S y t .y_- �b3„� z;` 'v �. �o• fr »i � r~u �x I''.�-,riF ' V Y N'ry ..`il Y.{ S R. ..: M� •� .. a4T 5:.:1 vE... .4tt Ct�. rye�Fi' f � v::5 � �•�" t:.f ..Y f<.al of _ u y . - k EXCERPT FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m. , July 11, 1990, at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14. ! Y t Y f f ! !t fF f ! ! ! t ! ![ DISTRICT I Moved, seconded and unanimously Approv ng - 1 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1990-91 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 13,742,000 Capital Facilities Fund 17,261,000 Construction Fund - 1986 4,034,000 Construction Fund - 1990 25,313,000 TOTAL $ 60,350,000 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 1 - 1 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1990-91 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 35,161,000 Capital Facilities Fund 64,996,000 Construction Fund - 1986 11,949,000 Construction Fund - 1990 76,002,000 TOTAL $188,108,000 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 1 - 1 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1990-91 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 42,645,000 Capital �a *ilities Fund 69,836,000 Construction Fund - 1986 13,496,000 u Construction Fund - 1990 81,883,000 Bond 8 Interest Fund - 1951 269,000 TOTAL $208,129,000 -1- 07/11/90 DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 199 - 1 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District' s 1990-91 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 9,673,000 Capital Facilities Fund 9,452,000 Construction Fund - 1990 20,850,000 Bond & Interest Fund - 1951 33,000 TOTAL $ 40,008,000 DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 19 - 1 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1990-91 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 7,768,000 Capital Facilities Fund 10,260,000 Construction Fund - 1990 15,500,000 TOTAL $ 33,528,000 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 1 90-91 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1990-91 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 13,218,000 Capital Facilities Fund 28,253,000 Construction Fund - 1990 25,603,000 Bond & Interest Fund - 1962 296,000 TOTAL $ 67,370,000 DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approv ng 1990-91 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1990-91 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: iperating Fund $ 11,175,000 Capital Facilities Fund 13,709,000 . Construction Fund - 1990 26,120,000 Bond & Interest Fund - 1958 37,000 TOTAL $ 51,041,000 -2- 07/11/90 DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 1990-91 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District's 1990-91 fiscal `./ year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 917,000 Capital Facilities Fund 12,414,000 TOTAL $ 13,331,000 DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and unanimously A�rovi ng 199 - 1 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: butlget That the District's 1990-91 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 1,233,000 Capital Facilities Fund 13,483,000 TOTAL $ 14,716,000 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE j I, RITA J. BROWN, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be a full , true and correct copy of minute entries of the meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 11th day of July, 1990. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 11th day of July, 1990. �: ry o . 5I u1 r'ec Secretary of a Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 `.J -3- STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting on 0 , 19410 was duly posted for public inspection at the main lobby of the Districts' offices on IN WWIITNEpSS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this S day of 19 Q L� Rita .7. Brow , Secretary o each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 of Orange County, California