HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-06-13/ Az�l
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
a s h OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
�N P.O. BOX 8127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 9270&7018
(714) 962-2411
June 6 , 1990
NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 13, 1990 - 7:30 P.M.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of
Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and
date.
\ yfNJG.gi��
secretary
Tentatively-Scheduled Upcoming Meetings:
FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - Wednesday, June 20th, at 5: 30 p.m.
DISTRICTS 3 & 11 - Thursday, June 21st, at 5: 30 p.m.
SELECTION COMMITTEE
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday, June 27th, at 5 : 30 p.m.
CONSERVATION, - Thursday, June 28th, at 5 :30 p.m.
L, RECLAMATION AND REUSE
COMMITTEE
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS \
sl ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA
,p fans ave
20.WX 8127
ipUNfYN V1LLEY,WIfORMR 92�
v1a s822�n �N�1
JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES
Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings
June Jun 13, 1990 Jun 27, 1990
July Jul 11, 1990 Jul 25, 1990
August Aug 08, 1990 None Scheduled
September Sep 12, 1990 Sep 26, 1990
October Oct 10, 1990 Oct 24, 1990
.November Nov 14, 1990 None Scheduled
December Dec 12, 1990 None Scheduled
January Jan 09, 1991 Jan 23, 1991
February Feb 13, 1991 Feb 27, 1991
March Mar 13, 1991 Mar 27, 1991
April Apr 10, 1991 Apr 24, 1991
May May 08, 1991 May 29, 1991
June Jun 12, 1991 Jun 26, 1991
-BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127• 108" Ells Avenue
of Orange County, California Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Telephone:(714)962-2411
JOINT BOARDS
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
JUNE 13, 1990 - 7:30 P.M.
In accordance with the requirements of California Government
Code Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72
hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written
materials relating to. each agenda item are available for public
inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary.
In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is
proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or
action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2, or
as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72
hours prior to the meeting date.
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll call
( 3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tam, if necessary
(4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts
of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if
any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders)
(5) Public comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards
on specific items or matters of general interest
should do so at this time. As determined by the Chairman,
speakers may be deferred until .the specific item is taken
for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes.
(6 ) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel
present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general
interest to the Directors. These reports arr, for
information only and require no action by the Directors.
(a) Report of Joint Cho!,-man
(b) Report of General Manager
(c) Report of General Counsel
6/13/90o
(7) EACH DISTRICT
ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the _
following minutes will be deemed approved as
mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman:
District 1 - May 11, 1990 regular
District 2 - May 11, 1990 regular
District 3 - May 11, 1990 regular
District 5 - May 11, 1990 regular
District 6 - May 11, 1990 regular
District 7 - May 11, 1990 regular
District 11 - May 11, 1990 regular
District 13 - May 11, 1990 regular
District 14 - May 11, 1990 regular
(8) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of
claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows:
(Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will
be regarded as the same for each District represented unless
a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any
District. ) See pages "A" and "B"
5/09/90 5/23/90
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - $ 399,974.42 $1,014,210.78
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 9,572,462.48 2,496,520.54
Joint Working Capital Fund - 384,149 .04 179,126 .23
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 12,417 .85 119,862. 03
DISTRICT NO. 1 - -0- 343 .00
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 628,461.28 1,269 ,102.58
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 16,975.22 73 ,910.10
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 823,807. 34 61,196 .75
DISTRICT NO. 6 - 1,175.25 257 .21
DISTRICT NO. 7 - 398,683.76 382,589 .43
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 369.27 8,460.43
DISTRICT NO. 13 - -0- 38.00
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 451, 350.10 6,290 .41
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 66,689.26 2,167.64
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,045.60 -0-
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 9.14 769.40
$12,758 ,570.01 $5,614,844.53
-2-
6/13/90
(9) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 9(a) THROUGH 9(x)
All matters placed on the consent calendar are
4./ considered as not requiring discussion or further
explanation and unless any particular item is
requested to be removed from the consent calendar by
a Director, staff member, or member of the public in
attendance, there will be no separate discussion of
these items. All items on the consent calendar will
be enacted by one action approving all motions, and
casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included
on the consent calendar. All items removed from the
consent calendar shall be considered in the regular
order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item
from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by
the chair, state their name, address and designate
by letter the item to be removed from the consent
calendar.
The Chairman will determine if any items are to be
deleted from the consent calendar.
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items
appearing on the consent calendar not specifically
removed from same, as follows:
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid
tabulation and recommendation; rejecting the bid of
Leeman Labs, Inc. not meeting the specifications;
and awarding Purchase of One (1) Inductively
Coupled Plasma Emission Spectrometer, Specification
No. E-190, to Leco Corporation for the delivered
price of $122,000.00 plus sales tax for Alternate
Bid Item B. See page "C"
(b) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 17 to the plans and specifications for
Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4,
authorizing an addition of $21,626 .00 to the
contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for four
items of additional work. See page "D"
(c) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Central
Laboratory, Job No. J-17, authorizing a net
addition of $22,378.00 to the contract with
J. R. Roberts Corporation for five items of
additional work or deletions, and granting a
time extension of seven calendar days for
completion of said changes. See page "E"
-3-
6/13/90
(9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(d) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 1 to the electrical equipment purchase
contract with Cooper Industries, Energy Services
Group, dba C-B Reciprocating, for Purchase of
Spark-Ignited Engines for Use in Central Power
Generation Systems, Job No. J-19A, authorizing an
additional $10,000.00 to upgrade all eight
engines with new computer controls, increasing
the contract amount from $20,658,245.00 to an
amount not to exceed $20,668,245.00; extending
the date for delivery of the heat recovery
equipment from June 30, 1990 to September 1,
1990; and extending the date for delivery of
spare parts from June 4, 1990 to August 1, 1990.
See page F.
(a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 5 to the plans and specifications for
warehouse and Maintenance Building and Oil
Storage and Dispensing Improvements, Job
No. J-20, authorizing a net addition of
$16,528. 34 to the contract with J. R. Roberts
Corporation for six items of additional work or
deletions. See page "G"
(f) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to
issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order
No. 37965 issued to Sur-Lite Corporation for
Purchase of Five Waste Digester Gas Flares, Job
No. J-21A, decreasing the number of waste gas
flares purchased from five to four, and the total
authorized amount from $284,216 .00 to
$239,400.00, plus sales tax.
(g) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 29 to the plans and specifications for
Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20 ,
and Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4;
Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts; and
Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31,
authorizing an addition of $130,821.95 to the
contract with Riewi'c Pacific Co. for 13 items of
miscellaneous modifications and additions. See
page "H"
(h) Consideration of the following actions relative
to Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation
Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-2:
(1 ) Consideration of motion approving Change
Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications
for said protect, authorizing an addition of
$104,883 .45 to t:ie contract with Advanco
Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors,
Inc. for one item of additional work to
accommodate Souclern California Edison
Company and City of Huntington Beach
improvements. See page "I"
[ITEM (9) (h) CONTINUED ON PAGE 5]
-4-
6/13/90
(9 ) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(h) (2) Consideration of motion approving Change
Order No. 2 to the plans and specification
for said project, authorizing an addition of
$132,628.20 to the contract with Advanco
Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors,
Inc. for one item of additional work for
compatibility with new Central Power
Generation Systems project. See page ^J"
(i) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 8 to the plans and specifications for
Miscellaneous Modifications and Improvements to
Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-37, authorizing an addition of $29,190.00
to the contract with Ziebarth 6 Alper for ten
items of additional work. See page "K^
(j ) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection
Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 3 to the
Professional Services Agreement with Lee and So
Consulting Engineers for design and construction
services required for Primary Clarifiers
Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation
Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33, to provide for
additional construction support services.
(k) Consideration of the following actions relative
to the Professional Services Agreement with
James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers, Inc.
to conduct astudy of user categories for
establishing rates for Districts' one-time
connection fees and annual use fees:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and
approve the Selection Committee
certification of the final negotiated fee
for said services. See page "L"
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-54,
approving said agreement with James M.
Montgomery Consulting Engineers, Inc. for
said services, on an hourly-rate basis fcr
labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses,
subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for
a total amount not to exceed $89 ,549 .00.
See page ^M"
(1) Consideration of the following actions relative
to Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services
Agreement with Martin %ordick, Sr. for
specialized construction inspection services re
various master-planned construction projects,
providing for extension of said agreement and
increasing the hourly rate:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive, file end..
approve the Selection Committee
certification of the final negotiated fee
`.' for said additional services. See page
'N'
[ITEM (9) (1) CONTINUED ON PAGE 61
-5-
6/13/90
(9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(1) (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-55,
approving said Addendum No. 1 to said
agreement with Martin Rordick, Sr. ,
extending said agreement for construction
inspection services, on an as-needed basis,
for a two-year period beginning August 10,
1990, at the increased hourly rate of $40.00
for the first year and $42.50 for the second
year, plus mileage reimbursement for
on-the-job travel. See page ^0^
(m) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny
claim of Emmanuel Ojo dated April 30, 1990, in
the amount of $553.32 for alleged damage to his
vehicle while parked on the perimeter road next
to the Santa Ana River at Plant No. 1, and refer
to the Districts' General Counsel and liability
claims administrator for appropriate action.
(n) Consideration of motion authorizing the General
Manager to employ Dr. Y. J. Shan in the
classification of Senior Engineer, at the salary
of $5377/month, to work in the Districts'
Operations Division.
(o) Consideration of motion authorizing the General
Manager to designate members of the Boards and/or
staff to attend and participate in meetings,
hearings, conferences facility inspections and
other functions which, in his opinion, will be of
value to the Districts or affect the Districts'
interests, including, but not limited to, those
conducted by state and federal legislative and
regulatory bodies and the California Association
of Sanitation Agencies, California Water
Pollution Control Association, Association of
Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, and the Water
Pollution Control Federation; and authorizing
reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and
incidental expenses in accordance with existing
Districts' policies and the approved annual
budget for 1990-91.
DISTRICT 2
(p) Consideration of the following actions relative
to Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between
Edinger Avenue and Lampson Avenue, Contract
No. 2-26-2, and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on
Ball Road between Euclid Street and walnut
Street, Contract No. 2-27:
(1) Consideration of motion approving Change
Order No. 7 to the plans and specifications
for said project, authorizing an addition of
$56,773.00 to the contract with W. H. Ebert
Corp. for nine items of additional wry and
granting a time extension of 12 calend, -,
days for completion of said additional work.
See page P.
[ITEM (9) (p) CONTINUED ON PAGE 7]
-6-
6/13/90
(9) DISTRICT 2 - (CONSENT CALENDAR CONTINUED)
(p) (2) Consideration of motion approving Change
Order No. 8 to the plans and specifications
for said project, authorizing an adjustment
of engineer's quantities for a net addition
of $270,519 . 30 to the contract with
W. H. Ebert Corp. See page "Q"
(3) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-59-2,
accepting said project as complete,
authorizing execution of a Notice of
Completion and approving the Final Closeout
Agreement. See page "R"
(q) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-60-2,
approving plans and specifications for Portion of
Euclid Interceptor Sewer, Between Broadway and
Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-3; Katella
Relief Sewer, Between Euclid Street and Walnut
Street, Contract No. 2-28; and Orangewood
Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29, and
authorizing the General Manager to establish the
date for receipt of bids. See page "S"
(r) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-61-2,
approving Agreement with Kraemer Imperial
Associates relative acceptance of new Grant of
Easement in connection with a realigned portion
of the Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract
No. 2-9, (Realignment entitled Contract
No. 2-9A) ; and approving and authorizing
execution of a Corporation Quitclaim Deed,
quitclaiming the District's interest in a portion
of the original sewer line and easement therefor
from Kraemer Imperial Associates. See page
„T„
(s) Consideration of the following actions relative
to collection of unpaid connection fees: See
page "U"
( 1) Consideration of motion authorizing the
General Counsel to file a complaint in the
Municipal Court seeking recovery of unpaid
sewer connection fees in the amount of
$7,038.00 from Banco Development.
(1 ) Consideration of motion authorizing the
General Counsel to file a complaint in the
Municipal Court seeking recovery of unpaid
sewer connection fees in the amount of
$11,593.81 from Bristol Lane Associates .
-7-
6/13/90'
(9 ) DISTRICT 3 - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(t) Consideration of the following actions, pursuant
to the Boards- redevelopment agency tax increment
policy, relative to the Cypress Redevelopment
Agency Los Alamitos Race Track and Golf Course
Redevelopment Project and the Lincoln Avenue
Redevelopment Project:
(1 ) Consideration of motion to receive and file
letter from GRC Redevelopment Consultants,
Inc. dated April 11, 1990 proposing said
pass-through. See page "y"
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-62-3,
approving Agreement with Cypress
Redevelopment Agency, re pass-through of
historical, proportional annual tax
increment to District relative to the
Los Alamitos Race Track and Golf Course
Redevelopment Project. See page "W"
( 3) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-63-3,
electing a tax increment pass-through,
pursuant to Section 33676 of the Health and
Safety Code, relative to the Lincoln Avenue
Redevelopment Project. See page I.W.
DISTRICT 5
(u) Consideration of the following actions relative
to South Coast Trunk Sewer, Phase I, Contract
No. 5-35-1:
(1) Consideration of motion approving Addendum
No. 1 to the plans and specifications for
said project, making miscellaneous technical
and traffic control clarifications.
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-64-5,
receiving and filing bid tabulation and
recommendation and awarding contract for
said project to W. H. Ebert Corp. in the
total amount of- $880,066.00. See page
"1."
(v) Consideration of motion approving Memorandum of
Understanding with The Irvine Company re
construction of Improvements to Bayside Drive
Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-34-3. See page
nZ"
-8 �
6/13/90
(9) DISTRICTS 7 & 14 - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(w) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny
amended claim of Southern California Edison
Company dated May 18, 1990 (original claim in an
estimated amount dated 4/13/90 never received and
filed) in the amount of $4,328.74 for alleged
damages to a 12,000 volt line incurred during
construction of Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from
Bristol Street to Fairview Road (and City of
Costa Mesa street improvements) , Contract
No. 14-1-1B, and refer to the Districts, General
Counsel, liability claims administrator,
contractor and contractor's insurance company for
appropriate action.
DISTRICT 7
(x) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-65-7,
authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex
2.50 acres of territory to the District in the
vicinity of the southeast corner of the
intersection of Lemon Heights Drive and Lower
Lake Drive in unincorporated County territory
(proposed Annexation No. 135 - Williams
Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7) .
See page "AA"
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
(10) ALL DISTRICTS
Consi�ion of action on items deleted from Consent
Calendar, if any
L.�
-9-
6/13/90'_ - `-
(11 ) ALL DISTRICTS
NOmina ons for Joint Chairman (Election t0 be held at
regular July Board Meeting)
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
Consign of motion to receive, file and approve staff
Summary Financial Report for nine-month period ending
March 31, 1990 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material)
(13) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of the following actions relative to NPDES
Ocean Monitoring Program:
(a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve
Report and Recommendation for NPDES Ocean Monitoring
Program Year Six (1990-91) and Selection Committee
Certification of the negotiated fee for Amendment No. 7
to Agreement with Science Applications International
Corporation (SAIL) for Ocean Monitoring Contract
Services for Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall,
Specification No. 5-032 (Copy enclosed with Directors'
agenda material) .
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-56, approving
Amendment No. 7 to the Agreement with SAIC for Ocean
Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-Inch
Ocean Outfall, Specification No. 5-032, extending the
contract from July 1, 1990 to June 30, 1991, for an
amount not to exceed $1,821,365.00 for the sixth year of
said contract. See page "BB"
(14) ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Report of the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse
Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file
and approve the Committee's actions and written report of
the meeting on May 31, 1990 (Copy enclosed with
Directors' agenda material) .
(b) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager
and General Counsel to negotiate with property owners for
acquisition of a site or sites for a water reclamation
facility in the general vicinity of the Anaheim Forebay
based upon appraisals for such property.
-10-
6/13/90
(15) ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Report of the Executive Committee and Fiscal Policy
Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file
r.� and approve the Committees' actions and written report
of the meeting on May 23, 1990 (Copy enclosed with
Directors' agenda material) .
(b) Consideration of action on items recommended by said
Committees:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive and file the
Committees' report and recommendations re 1990-91
personnel requirements and joint works operating
and construction budgets.
(2) Consideration of actions re personnel requirements:
(a) Consideration of motion approving 1990-91
personnel requirements
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-57,
amending Classification and Compensation
Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, re 1990-91
personnel requirements
(3) Roll call vote motion approving proposed 1990-91
Joint Operating Budget Funds, as follows:
Fund Total Amount
Joint Operating/Working Capital $50,207,000
Workers' Compensation Self-Insured 218,000
Self-Funded Health Plan Trust 1,264,000
Public Liability Self-Insured 329,000
(4) Roll call vote motion approving proposed 1990-91
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget (CORP Joint
Works Construction) in the total amount of
$103,422,000.
(5) Consideration of motion authorizing and directing
the Fiscal Policy Committee to evaluate proposals
obtained by the Districts' insurance broker and
to place Excess. Workers' Compensation insurance
coverage effective July 1, 1990; said action to be
submitted to the Joint Boards for ratification or
revision at the regular meeting on July 11, 1990.
(6) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-58, approving
Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo
Engineers to conduct. a foul air treatment
optimization study, on an hourly-rate basis for
labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses,
subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total
amount not to exceed $85,000.00. See page "CC"
-11-
6/13/•90
(16) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion authorizing the Director of
Finance to certify claims and forward to the Orange County
auditor for immediate payment for expenditures incurred
after June 30, 1990, and declaring that such certification
shall comply with the provisions of Resolution No. 76-10
pertaining to procedures for payment of claims against the
Districts until the 1990-91 budgets are adopted by the
respective Districts.
(17) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the
proposal of Sonnenschein, Nath & Rosenthal, Attorneys At Law,
dated June 6, 1990, for continuation of services of Mr. Lee
Paterson, Esq. , now associated with said firm, as special
labor counsel for the Districts. See page "DD"
(18) ALL DISTRICTS
Closed Session: During the course of conducting the
usiness se forth on this agenda as a regular
meeting of the Boards, the Chairman may convene the
Boards in closed session to consider matters of
pending or potential litigation, or personnel
matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9
or 54957.6.
Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real
property; (b) matters of pending or potential
litigation; (c) employee compensation; or which are
exempt from public disclosure under the California
Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards
during a permitted closed session and are not
available for public inspection. At such time as
final actions are taken by the Directors on any of
these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required
disclosures of information.
(a) Convene in closed session, if necessary
(b) Reconvene in regular session
(c) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered
in closed session.
(19) ALL DISTRICTS
Ot er usiness and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(20) DISTRICT 1
Other and communications or supplemozztal agenda
items, if any
(21) DISTRICT 1
Con�tion of motion to adjourn
-12-
6/13/90
(22) DISTRICT 2
Ot�Fus-iness and communications or supplemental agenda
items, 1£ any
(23) DISTRICT 2
Con�tion of motion to adjourn
(24) DISTRICT 5
Other usiness and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(25) DISTRICT 5
Conssi eration of motion to adjourn
(26 ) DISTRICT 6
Other usiness and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(27) DISTRICT 6
ConsiTe—ration of motion to adjourn
(28) DISTRICT 7
Ot er usiness and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(29) DISTRICT 7
Con�tion of motion to adjourn
( 30) DISTRICT 13
Other siness and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
( 31) DISTRICT 13
Condon of motion to adjourn
( 32) DISTRICT 14
Other usiness and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
( 33) DISTRICT 14
Condon of motion to adjourn
( 34) DISTRICTS 3 6 11
Consideration the following actions relative to Addendum
No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo
Engineers for preparation of Phase I Preliminary Project
Report for Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System
Improvements, Contract No. 11-17, providing for preparation of
plans and specifications and construction support services:
(a) verbal staff report
(b) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report
dated June 5 , 1990 re Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage
System Improvements. See page "EE"
(b) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection
Committee to solicit a proposal and negotiate Addendum
No. 1 to said agreement with John Carollo Engineers for
L said additional services.
-13-
6/137504'-
( 35) DISTRICT 3
Ot—he�iness and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
( 36) DISTRICT 3 �.
Con�tion of motion to adjourn
( 37) DISTRICT 11
Ot er siness and communications or supplemental agenda
Stems, if any
( 38) DISTRICT 11
Conssi eraEion of motion to adjourn
-14-
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127•10844 Ellis Avenue
of Orange County, California Fountain Valley,CA 9272MI27
Telephone:(714)962-2441
�.r
JOINT BOARDS
Vesting Date
June 13, 1990 at 7:30 p.m.
The following is a brief explanation of the maze important, non-routine
items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise
self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material
summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting.
ALL DISTRICTS
9(a) : AWAED PURCHASE OF INDUCTIVELY COUPIED PIASSMA (ICP) EMISSION SPECPROMEPER,
SPECIFICATION NO. E-190.
The Districts' laboratory staff provides analytical determinations of
various chemical constituents in wastewater and sludge samples for determining
caupliance with NPDPS ocean discharge permit and sauce control orrlinamv
requi raments, Analyses for metals are currently performed using atomic
absorption (AA) spectrometers, with confirmation on a limited percentage of
sample splits performed using an inductively coupled plasma (ICP) spectrarater
by an catside laboratory. In order to increase capacity and allow the most
economical analysis of all source control samples by both AA and ICP, thereby
increasing confidence in results when determining carpliance of industrial
dischargers, staff has solicited bids for purchase of an ICP emission
spectrometer.
Due to space limitations within the existing laboratory, technical
specifications included a size limitation specifying a benchtcp instrument. Two
manufacturers of instruments meeting this size Limitation submitted bids of
$121,675.00 and $122,000.00 excluding sales tax. The IECO Corporation
instrument meets all specifications. However, the instrmnent manufactured by
the apparent low bidder, Leeman Labs, Inc., fails to meet Technical
Specification IV.B.7 requiring a completely solid-state radio frequency (RF)
generator. The presence of a power tube in the Leeman instrument RF generator
represents a significant potential for lower reliability and higher maintenance
cost versus the totally solid-state LEM Corporation instrument RF generator
which meets the specification. In addition, the LECO instrument exceeds the
one-year warranty specification by providurg a two-year warranty. An optional
ultrasonic nebulizer, bid by each manufacturer at $15,000.00, is useful to
achieve better detection limits but not required at this time.
June 13, 1990
Staff therefore recmmends that the bid from Leaman labs, Inc., be
rejected for not meeting specifications and that award for Specification No. �..i
E-190 be made to LEM Corporation, the lowest bidder meeting specifications for
Bid Alternate Bid Item B, in the amount of $122,000.00, plus sales tax. A copy
of the bid tabulation and recanrendation is attached to the supporting agenda
documents.
9(b): APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 17 TO ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION, JOB
NO. J-7-4.
Job No. J-7-4, Administration Building Addition, includes the
construction of an administration building addition and remodeling of the
existing administration building, addition of two new parking areas and
associated work at a cost of $3.9 million. Change Ogler No. 17 adds $21,626.00
to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation.
Item 1 directed the Contractor to furnish and install a new fire alarm
system to serve the Administration Building. The fire alarm system was required
by the City of Fountain Valley Fire Department and was not included in the
contract. The fire alarm system added a cost of $10,841.00 to the contract.
Item 2 resulted in an additional cost of $4,904.00 to modify the heating
system in the New South Wing to provide heat to Conference Room A.
Item 3 relocated the heating and ventilating system air compressor and
air dryer out of the existing Adm nistraUm Building Elevator Equipment Room
No. 134 to an adjacent roam. This item of work was required by the State of
California Department of Industrial Safety Elevator Division at an additional
cost of $3,439.00.
Item 4 was a cost of $2,442.00 for the Contractor to perform a variety of
electrical changes in the New South Wing and the Chiller Building. These
changes included adding and wiring a new landscaping sprinkler controller,
wiring electric door latches and adding light fixtures.
The above-described changes are considered by staff to be corrections
which would have been included in the original design if discovered or known
prior to its completion. None of the items are for replaced woik.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 17 adding $21,626.00 to the
contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation. There is no time extension associated
with this change order.
9(c): APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CENTRAL
LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17.
Job No. J-17, Central laboratory, provides for the construction of a new
laboratory and includes an addition of utilities to serve the new facility, site
paving, and provision for additional parking at a cost of $7,090,000.00. Change
Order No. 1 is a net addition of $22,378.00 and seven calendar days to the
contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation.
Item 1 directed the contractor to furnish and install woven fabric over
the entire bottom area of the foundation excavation. The soil condition found
during excavation was less substantial than the prebid borings indicated. The
Districts' soils consultant recon ended fabric as the most economical way to
-2-
June 13, 1990
stabilize existing marginal soils. This item resulted in an additional cost of
$20,832.00 and a time extension of seven calendar days. Item 2 revises the
building hardware schedule adding and deleting a number of hardware items for a
net additional cost of $587.00. Item 3 resulted is a credit of $1,155.00 to
change the pipe material in the restroans from contract-specified extra heavy
weight cast iron pipe to standard weight cast iron pipe commonly used in this
type of construction. The extra-duty material was not available.
Item 4 directed the contractor to change the finishes on the elevator and
trim from baked enamel to a more durable brushed stainless steel at the request
of the project architect. This item resulted in an additional cost of
$2,114.00. Item 5 is a no cost change for deleting a 120-day liquidated damage
clause in the contract for completion of site work and underground utilities.
Because of delays in determining the installation of underground utilities, the
Districts and the contractor agreed it would be mutually beneficial to postpone
the work until later in the contract.
The above-described changes are considered by staff to be corrections
which world have been included in the original design if discovered or known
prior to its completion. Now of the items are for replaced work.
Staff recamends approval of Change Order No. 1 for a net addition of
$22,378.00 and seven calendar days to the contract with J. R. Roberts
corporation.
9(d) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO PURCHASE OF.SPARK-IGNITED ENGINES FOR
USE IN CENTRAL POWER GEN =CN SYSTRE, JOB NO. J-19A.
Job No. J-19A is a $20.7 million contract with Cooper Industries to
supply eight large engine-generating sets for the new $65.0 million Central
Power Generation Systems at both treatment plants. The manufacture of the
engines, generators and auxiliary equipment is near completion and the first of
the two facilities to house the power plants is now under construction. Change
Order No. 1 adds $10,000.00 and extends certain delivery schedules.
The engines will use secondary treated wastewater (effluent) for cooling
water which could enter the engine combustion areas and cause damage if the
cooling coils fail. To attenuate this possibility, a supplemental cooling loop
and pimp have been designed. This change will provide control for this system
by the computer being purchased under this contract. The additional cost to
upgrade is $10,000.00 for all eight engines.
Due to delays in approving heat recovery equipment and controls, a time
extension of 63 days, to September 1, 1990, extending the goal for delivery of
this material has been requested. The original contract and Ame[rtment No. 3
required delivery of this equipment 506 days after receipt of the Notice to
Proceed, or June 30, 1990 (one of the many delivery goals). This additional
delay for delivery of the heat recovery and control equipment will have no
effect on the facility currently under construction at Plant No. 2, Job No.
J-19-2.
Cooper Industries has also requested an extension of 58 days for delivery
v of the specified spare parts for the Central Power Generation Systems. The
original contract required delivery by June 3, 1990, The extension will require
delivery by August 1, 1990, and will have no effect on. current construction of
Job No. J-19-2, or on the maximum contract time.
-3-
June 13, 1990
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 in the amount of
$10,000.00 to the purchase contract providing for the above recommended changes
and increasing the contract from $20,658,245.00 to an amount not to exceed
$20,668,245.00, and the above-described time extensions.
9(e): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 TO WAREHOUSE AND MAIR NANCE BUILDING. AND
OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING IDTROVEMERM, JOB NO. J-20.
Job No. J-20, Warehouse and Maintenance Building, and Oil Storage and
Dispensing improvements, includes the construction of eight warehouse and
maintenance buildings, remodeling of the existing oil storage facility and
site paving, at= drain and fire protection systems at a cost of $3.4 million.
Change Order No. 5 is a net addition of $16,528.34 to the contract with
J. R. Roberts Corporation.
item 1 directed the Contractor to change the type of building insulation
to be installed in the open ceiling areas of three new buildings to a foil-faced
fire rated type. The un£aced type of insulation specified in the contract world
have resulted in fiberglass dust constantly falling on Districts' personnel
working below the unfinished ceilings, creating an unhealthy working
environment. This item resulted in an additional cost of $9,852.00. Item 2
resulted in an additional cost of $3,459.00 to construct new fencing and gates
to secure the auto shop compound upon completion of the new structures. The
contract drawings and specifications did not include new, fencing and service
access gates for the auto shop compound. Item 3 added a dishwasher including
plumbing in the new lunchroom in Building No. 6, at a cost of $1,247.00.
Item 4 directed the Contractor to add a new electrical terminal bus bar
to the electrical power panel inside the existing Electric/Instrument Shop "A"
The bus bar was added in order to provide space to connect new electrical power
cables to serve new Maintenan a Buildings "5" and "6". The additional cost
of furnishing and installing the bus bar added $1,809.00 to the contract.
Item 5 changes the contract-specified floor sealer to a combination floor
hardener and penetrating sealer for all the new warehouse building concrete
floors for better wear. This item added $2,888.00 to the contract. Item 6 is a
credit of $2,726.66 from the contract for abandonment of an existing 6-inch city
water line crossing the North Road, required by the City of Fountain Valley.
The work was performed by another contractor to expedite completion of the water
system revisions.
The above-described changes are considered by staff to be corrections
which would have been included in the original design if discovered or known
prior to its completion.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 5 for a net addition of
$16,528.34 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation. There is no time
extension associated with this change order.
91E1: APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO PURCHASE ORDER NO. 37965 WITH SUR-ISTE
CORPORATION FOR PURCHASE OF FIVE WA= DIGESTER GAS FIARFS, JOB NO.
J-21A.
In February 1989 the Directors authorized staff to issue a purchase order
to Sur-Lite Corporation for the fabrication and installation of five waste
digester gas flares, one at Plant No. 2 and four at Plant No. 1, for an amount
not to exceed $284,216.00, plus sales tax. No payment was due until the Permit
-4-
June 13, 1990
to Construct (Plan) was issued by South Coast Air Quality Management District
v (SCAQMD). The price included a discount of $3,000.00 per flare because five or
more flares were purchased.
In April the PIC was received. During the 14-month SCAQMD permitting
period, it was determined by SCAM that only two flares would be permitted for
operation at Plant No. 1. One additional flare will be allowed for standby.
Thus, only four flares will be manufactured and installed instead of the five
originally contracted.
Sur-Lite, because of the reduced quantity, SCAQM7 permitting time delays
and cost increases, will not provide the $3,000.00 par unit volume discount.
Staff believes the lost discount which now essentially amounts to a $3,000.00
fabrication increase (6% over 14 months) is reasonable.
The recamands action is to authorize the General Manager to issue
Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 39765, decreasing the number of flares
from five to four and the total purchase order amount from $284,216.00 to an
amount not to exceed $239,400.00, plus sales tax.
9(g) ; APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 29 70 BEADWORRS NO. 2 AT PIANP NO. 1,
JOB NO. P1-20; AND DEPALPITCN OF DIGESTERS NOS. 1, 2 AND 4; REPfFGQ�D II'
OF BOILER; PIPING CLEANOUTS; AND GRADING AND PAVING AT PLANr NO. 2,
JOB NO. P1-31.
Job No. P1-20, Beadworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1 and Job No. P1-31,
Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping
Cleanouts; and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, includes the construction of a
new 140 million gallon per day influent pimping plant and preliminary treatment
facilities at a cost of $33.8 million. Change Order No. 29 adds 13 items of
work and $130,821.95 to the contract.
Item 1, in the amount of $9,138.00, provides for modifications and
additions to the hot water circulation system at the new boiler and a lighting
relocation. These additions and modifications were not shown on the original
contract plans and were needed for proper boiler operation. Item 2, in the
amount of $13,141.00, provides for modifications to the influent pump seal water
system and scrubber recirculation pumps. Additional pressure switches were
added to identify seal water failures and to verify flaws within the foul air
scrubbers.
Item 3, in the amount of $7,593.00, is for the addition of two wet well
level indicators at the VFD room in Power Building 3A. These indicators were
requested by Operations staff to accomndate manual operation of the influent
pumps in the event of a failure in the automatic control system. Item 4, in the
amount of $6,251.00, provides for modification to the influent pump system
control logic. These modifications were also requested by Operations staff so
that the levels of the two pump wet wells could be monitored to eliminate a
potential problem of locking out the lag influent pump during a lead pump
failure.
Item 5 is the addition of an another ground wire at each of the four
�.s influent pumps which was required to prevent pump bearing damage from stray
ground wire currents flawing between the influent pump and its motor. This
ground wire was not shown on the contract drawings and was added to the contract
at a cost of $4,985.00.
-5-
June 13, 1990
Item 6, in the amount of $398.00, provides for modifications to the plant
water piping system which conflicted with the installation of stainless steel
covers at the existing grit chambers. Item 7, in the amount of $5,112.00,
provides for modifications to the chlorine system which were required to
facilitate proper operation of the Chlorine Building's safety system in the
event of a chlorine leak. Item 8, in the amount of $13,384.00, provides for
modification of the structural tie-in at the new inlet channel. The Contractor
was directed to revise the location and method of the tie-in of the new inlet
channel at the Metering and Diversion Building to avoid a conflict between the
contract-specified removable wall panel and the Ellis Avenue trunk line, as the
wall had been relocated earlier in the project to avoid a conflict with the
Sunflower pump station. Item 9, in the amount of $3,054.00, is for added work
at the existing Headworks. After the contract-specified removal of the bar
screens, the Districts' Mechanical Maintenance Division requested that the two
existing slide gates and one wooden stop gate also be removed as they no longer
served a function and could pose a problem in the future if they failed.
Item 10, in the amount of $4,571.00, is for revisions to the cover plate
support beams at the existing Headworks due to a connection detail conflict on
the contract plans. Item 11, in the amount of $5,221.95, is for extra work at
the new inlet channel tie-in after the Contractor was directed to evacuate the
new inlet channel during an emergency floating of the work area due to a gate
failure at the Metering and Diversion Structure on January 17, 1990. Item 12,
in the amount of $3,389.00, is for revisions to the Sunflower Pump Station
covers. This included installation of hold down anchors on the lower inclined
covers to allow individual cover removal which will greatly reduce the time and
effort for future maintenance of the lower portion of the pump screws. Item 13,
in the amount of $54,584.00, provides for electrical modification at Power
Building 3A. This modification provided for an increase of bus duct capacity
from 2000 amps to 3000 amps to meet the potential amperage of the newly
installed tie bus between the two standby generators.
The above-described changes would have been included in the original
design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items are for
replaced work.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 29 for an addition of
$130,821.95 to the contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. There is no time extension
associated with this change order.
9(h) APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDERS NOS.1 AND 2 TO SLUDGE HANDLING FArrr•mHES AT
RECIAMMON PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-2.
This project includes the construction of a new sludge handling and truck
loading facility, a new plant water pump station, power distribution building,
the construction of a new 12 EV service center and minor improvements to
existing sludge handling facilities at Plant No. 1, at a cost of $19,085,000.00.
(1) Change Order No. l
Change Order No. 1 consists of one item of extra work in the amount
of $104,883.45. Change Order No. 1 provides for the construction of an
entirely underground 12 KV electrical service in lieu of the partially
overhead service specified in the original contract documents. This
-6-
June 13, 1990
change in the routing of the new electrical service was required to
coordinate current construction with future improvements planned by
Southern California Edison (SCE) and the City of Huntington Beach at
Garfield Avenue.
Meetings were held during the design phase of the project which
included the design engineer, Districts, staff and SCE. The proposed
design was discussed at these meetings and the detailed design was
submitted to SCE for review and comment. SCE did not complete its review
of the proposed design and make its final determinations for several
months and, in fact, not until after the design was complete. The
Districts could not hold up the project any longer and proceeded to bid
and award the project in August 1989.
The above described change is considered by staff to be a design
change which would have been included in the original design if knwm
prior to completion of the specifications. The change does not include
any rework.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 adding $104,883.45
to the contract with Fdvanco Constructors, Inc. There is no time
extension associated with this change order.
(2) Chance Order No. 2
Change Order No. 2 consists of one item of extra work in the amount
of $132,628.00 for modifications to the switchgear. modifications are
being made to the new switchgear to rake it compatible with future
cogeneration facilities. This project was designed prior to the finial
design of the Central Power Generation Systems project and the switchgear
change is recommended by the designers of this project and the designers
of the Central Power Generation project. If the change is approved,
construction dollars will be saved on the Central Power Generation
Systems project by avoiding installation of additional switchgear.
The above described change is considered by staff to be a design
change which would have been included in the original design if known
prim: to its completion. The change does not include any rework.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 adding $132,628.20
to the contract with Pdvanco Constructors, Inc. There is no time
extension associated with this change order.
9(i): APPROVAL OF CHANCE ORDER NO. 8 TO MISCELLANE'UDS MODIFICATIONS AND
DOROVEMEN S 7O FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLANP NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-37.
This $5.7 million project includes 38 items of non-related rehabilitation
and correctional work. larger items of work include replacement of the dames on
Digesters "A" and "B", replacement of two influent pumps at Headworks "C", the
installation of prepurchased barscreens at Headworks "C", replacement of grit
augers, screening conveyors, chlorine system piping and waste activated sludge
pumps, new primary influent flow meters, sheds for electric cart storage and
bypass waste activated sludge piping. Change Order No. 8 provides for ten items
..r of change and adds a net of $29,190.00 to the contract.
-7-
June 13, 1990 "
Item 1, in the amount of $2,430.00 provides for the fabrication and
installation of two new, sluice gate operator supports at Pflanz Headw ks to
replace those not suitable for reuse due to size and condition of materials.
Item 2, in the amount of $9,629.00 provides for the installation of additional
pipe, fittings and valves in digester gas piping at the roof of Digester "A" and
"B" pup room to facilitate the future installation of gas compressors. Item 3,
in the amount of $775.00, provides for the venting of chlor-alert alarm panels
to pent sampling mechanisms to function properly. Item 4, in the amunt of
$4,194.00, provides for changes in concrete walkway details to accamudate
changes in the location of the Raw Sewage Power Building. Item 5, a credit in
the amount of $6,224.00, deletes the installation of polymer storage tank level
controls and mass flow meters for ferric chloride dosing systems.
Item 6, in the amount of $5,460.00, provides for the relocation of
existing ferric chloride facility process piping and drains to eliminate
interferences with the construction of the new Conveyor Building. Item 7, in
the amount of $468.00, provides for electrical power circuitry for chlorine
solution rotometers in Rollins Tunnel that was inadvertently caitted from the
plans. Item 8, in the amount of $4,527.00, provides for the relocation of VFD
reactors at both waste activated pump control rams to meet electrical equipment
clearance requirements called for in the code. Item 9, in the amount of
$2,596.00, provides for the removal of the orifice type flow meters in the two
chlorine solution lines at the chlorination facility to eliminate chlorinator
malfunction.nct;on. Item 10, in the amount of $5,335.00, provides for the replacement
of portions of the existing belt press washwater piping that was too
deteriorated for reuse at propeller meter installations
The above described change is considered by staff to be a correction which
would have been included in the original design if discovered or known prior to
its cmpletion.
Staff recovends approval of Change Order No. 8 adding $29,190.00 to the
contract. No time extension is associated with this change.
9(7): AUTHORIZING THE SELECTION CU44r EE TO NEIX7PIATE ADDENDW NO. 3 TO
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGRE07Wr WITH LEE AND RO CONSULTING ENGMERS FOR
PRIMARY CLARIFIERS NOS. 6-15 AND MKIATEn FACILrMR.S AT RECL�ON
PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-33.
In January 1988, the Directors approved a professional services
agreement with lee and Ro Consulting Engineers to prepare plans and
specifications for 60 mgd of new primary clarifiers and related facilities at
Reclamation Plant No. 1. The project is now, under construction, at a cost of
approximately $40.0 million. The fast-paced project is requiring more
construction support services by the consultant than envisioned when the design
contract was awarded. Add'.tional time has been required for consultation and
clarifications, review of the cmplex systems, shop drawing submittals,
continuing support requested by the construction management team including site
visits and attending bi-wa- y coordination meetings, additional as-huilt
drawings, preparation of an amendment to the operations and maintenance manual,
and start-up training.
Staff recommends that U- Selection Cmmittee be authorized to negotiate
Addendum No. 3 for the additional engineering services for constriction support
services anticipated through the remainder of the construction phase `✓
(approximately 22 months). Following the Selection Cmmittes's negotiations,
the proposed addendum will be presented to the Boards for consideration.
-8-
June 13, 1990
9(k) : RECEIVE AND FILE SELECPION COMrtITi'EE CERTIFTCATiON AND APPROVE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREDEW FOR USER AND COMMOTION FEE STUDY WITH
JAMES M. MUMMERY CONSULTING ENGMERS.
With the exception of Districts Nos. 7 and 14, all Districts now have in
place an annual user charge collected on the tax bill. (District 7 will
implement such a fee in 1991-92 and District 14 is financed by IM.) The user
fee supplements tax revenues used to finance operating, maintenance and
replacement costs. In the future, user fees will also pay for debt service. In
addition, all Districts, with the exception of District No. 14, charge fees for
the connection of new development to the Districts' sewerage facilities.
Connection fees are used to pay for capital facilities needed to service the new
developrent.
The annual user fee and the one-time development connection fee charges
are currently based on limited land use designations. The user fee is based on
three categories: a separate flat fee for single family dwellings, and multiple
family dwellings; and a square footage charge for non-residential properties.
The connection fee has two categories; a flat fee for residential dwellings; and
a square footage charge for non-residential buildings.
During public hearings on fees there has been considerable comment on the
equitability of the fee structures and suggestions that the categories be
expanded, which staff believes has some marit. Staff has, therefore, proposed a
study to determine if the charges could be more equitable by expanding the
categories. Certain types of uses might pay less on the annual use charge and
others might pay more. The additional use designations could have to be
compatible with the Assessor's database program which was recently modified to
better accommodate multiple fee categories as well as make economic and
engineering sense.
Proposals have been solicited and the Selection Comnittee has negotiated
a professional services agreement with James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers
Inc. to conduct the study for an amount not to exceed $89,549.00, based on
hourly rates plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants fees and fixed
profit.
The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection
Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and
adoption of a resolution approving the Professional Services Agrean nt with
James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers Inc. Copies of the certification and
resolution are attached with the supporting agenda documents.
9(1) : RECEIVE AND FILE SELECTION CCK4rTPEE CE1i=CATION AND APPROVE ADDENDUM
ND. 1 TO PROFFSSICNAL SERVICES AGFOU24Ef FUR CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION
SERVICES WITH M4 M KORDICK. SR.
The Directors have previously authorized the Selection Committee to
solicit proposals and negotiate professional services agreements for speciality
consulting services necessary to assist in the construction management of
various master-planned projects. Under that authority, several consultants have
been retained, individually or through firms, to assist staff in the management
and inspection of the largest construction effort in the Districts' history.
The Districts currently have some $220 million in work under construction at the
Joint Treatment Works and in the individual District's collection systems.
-9-
June 13, 1990
In August 1988, the Directors approved a two-year agreement with Martin
Kor.ii„k, Sr. to assist the construction management team with inspection and
contract administration of various District's collection system projects. Mr.
Rordick has provided excellent assistance with the many on-going projects, as
well as acting as the Districts' representative to the various agencies involved
in the construction projects. Staff believes that Mr. Kordick's services will
continue to be required on planned collection system projects.
The Selection Committee has negotiated Addendum No. 1 with Martin
Koxdick, Sr. to extend the professional services agreement for two years, on an
as-needed basis, at the following rates: First year - $40.00 per hour; second
year - $42.50 per hour. The existing rate is $37.50 per hour. The agreement
also includes mileage reimbursement at the approved IRS rate.
The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection
Committee certification of the negotiated hourly rates, and adoption of a
resolution approving Addendum No. 1 to the professional services agreement with
Martin Kordick, Sr. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached
with the supporting agenda docmients.
9(m): RECEIVE, FILE AND DENY CfAIM SUB IIWED BY EMARINUEL WO FOR ALLEGED
VERICLE DAMAGE WHILE PARKED ON DISTRICTS' PROPERTY.
The Districts have received a claim from employee Emmanuel Ojo dated
April 30, 1990, for alleged damages to his vehicle. Mr. Ojo claims that his
vehicle was struck while parked on the Plant No. 1 East Perimeter Road next the
the Santa Ana River. The amount of the claim is $553.32.
The routine action appearing on the agenda is to receive, file and deny
the claim and refer it to the District's liability claims administrator and
General Counsel for appropriate action.
9(n) : AUrHORIZING EMPLOYMENT OF DR. Y. J. SHAD AS SENIOR EWI EER.
The Operations Division is responsible for around-the-clock plant
operations and compliance with air and water quality regulations. To assist in
accomplishing these tasks, the division employs several engineers as Senior
(process) Engineers ($4106/5337 per month) . The inam -mt process engineer
resigned several months ago.
We have been recruiting to fill this position for some time. After
screening the applicants, four individuals were intervieeed. Twv highly
qualified candidates were selected. One has withdrawn from further
consideration. The candidate who was selected for the position has excellent
qualifications by virtue of schooling (PhD) and experience (23 years with 12
years in wastewater treatment). He is highly qualified in the follad ng areas:
- Bachelor's degree in Chemical Engineering
- M.S. and Ph.D. in Civil/Sanitary Engineering
- Extensive experience in chemical application in wastewater plants
- Extensive experience in operating secondary plants above the design
capacity
- Teaching and staff training experience
- Author of technical articles
- Has performed EPA-funded research.
-10-
June 13, 1990
He cones highly recaumnded by Dr. David Jenkins of Berkeley and is very
interested in corking for the Districts. However, he is currently making more
than the Districts' staff is authorized to offer (mid-point of the salary
range) . Staff is therefore requesting authorization to employ Dr. Y. J. Shao as
a Senior Engineer at a salary of $5,337.00 per month.
9(o): GDEMM AUTHORIZATION FOR ATTENDANCE OF PERSONNEL AND DIRECTORS AT
[EE= IN 1990-91.
on an annual basis the General Manager is routinely authorized to
designate members of the Board and/or staff to attend meetings, conferences,
etc. which he believes will be of value to the Districts. Such attendance is in
accordance with the existing Districts' travel and expense reimbursement
policies and the approved annual budget. It is recnmended that this
authorization be renewed for 1990-91.
DISTRICT 2
9(p): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDERS N(S. 7 AND 8 TO PORTION OF EUCLID INIERCEPTOR
SEWER, BETWEEN EDII4GE2 AVENUE AND IAMPSON AVENUE, COVIRACf NO. 2-26-2,
AND SOUTH ANAHEIM RELIEF SEWER, ON BALL ROAD BETWEEN EUCLID STREET AND
WA= STREET, CLNTRPCr NO. 2-27 AND ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT AS COMPLETE.
This $9.8 million project is the installation of vitrified clay and
reinforced concrete gravity sewer relief lines. Contract No. 2-26-2, Portion of
the Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and Lampson Avenue, and
Contract No. 2-27, the South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road between Euclid
Street and Walnut Street, in the total amount of $9.6 million, are located
within the Cities of Garden Grove, Santa Ana, Fountain Valley and Anaheim. The
contract is now complete.
(1) Change Order No. 7
Change Order No. 7, in the amount of $56,773.00 consists of nine
items. Item 1, in the amoumt of $9,103.00, is for a change in the
traffic detour plan at the intersection of Euclid Street and McFadden
Avenue to provide for safe passage around a large excavation for
southboud traffic on Euclid Street. Item 2, in the amount of $5,941.00,
is for the removal of an old railroad crossing which was found to
conflict with the sewer alignment. This occurred when the alignment had
to be changed because the City of Carden Grove could not provide the
promised right-of-gray. Item 3, in the amount of $15,912.00, provides for
equipment standby charges caused by a delay in Southern California Gas
Co. 's relocation of a 3-inch gas main on Nelson Street. Item 4, in the
amount of $16,460.00, is for extra cork required because of undisclosed
utilities at various locations found while excavating for the new sewer
line. Item 5, in the amount of $1,935.00, provides for the necessary
removal of undisclosed sub-surface concrete which interfered with the
placement of a new manhole.
Item 6, in the amount of $1,300.00, is for the installation of air
vacuum release valves on a water line that was relocated for excavation
and construction of a new sewer line on Taft Avenue. (The added cost was
ordered by the City of Garden Grove, and staff will request
reimbursement. ) Item 7, for $1,295.00, provides for the bypass of an
-11-
June 13, 1990
existing 8-inch sewer during the construction of a new sewer line. Floras
would not allow for the bypass to be hooked into the new sewer line and V
were required to be extended to another manhole. Item 8, in the amount
of $ 1,161.00, is the removal and replacement of a 4-inch water line on
Nelson Street which was requested by the City of Garden Grave. The
District will be reimbursed by the City. Item 9, in the amount of
$3,666.00, provides for the removal of two sewer bypasses which were not
included in the contract. The bypasses had to be installed under
previous contracts and completion of this project now allows the
reconnection to the new line.
Staff reconuends approval of Change Order No. 7 in the amount of
$56,773.00 and an addition of 12 calendar days for completion of the
extra work.
(2) Chance Order No. 8
Change Order No. 8, in the amount of $270,519.00, is for an
adjustment of engineer's quantities for said project. The large overruns
were primarily the result of placement of additional base and pavement,
particularly on Euclid and Nelson Streets in the cities of Garden Grove
and Santa Ana.
Staff reccome ds approval of Change Order No. 8 to the contract in
the amount of $270,519.00. There is no time extension associated with
this change order.
(3) Acceptance of Contract as Camnlete
W. H. Ebert Corporation has fulfilled all contractual obligations
within the specified and earended time. Therefore, staff recannends
adoption of the resolution attached to the agenda material, authorizing
acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the Final Closeout
Agreement and filing of the Notice of Cc pletion as required. The final
project cost is $10,063,017.30.
9(q): APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PORTION OF EUCLID IINIEFJC@IOR
SEWER, COl1RACT NO. 2-26-3, RATELTA REL= SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-28,
AND ORANGEWOOD DIVERSION SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-29.
In September 1988, the Directors approved a professional services
agreement with Willdan Associates to design a Portion of Euclid Interceptor
Seiner, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenues, Contract No. 2-26-3, and
Eatella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract
No. 2-28. In April 1989, the Directors approved the professional services
agreeme.,t with Willdan Associates to design the Orangewood Diversion Sewer,
Contract No. 2-29 which is located on Orangewood Avenue between State College
Boulevard and the Santa Ana River. All three of these sewers were identified Li
the Master Plan of Trunk Sewers. Three other portions of the Euclid Interceptor
have been constructed during the last three years and are now in service.
Contract No. 2-26-3 is a portion of the Euclid Interceptor Sewer
beginning at Broadway in the City of Anaheim, which is the northerly terminus of
Contract No. 2-26, completed in October 1989, and ending on Orangethorpe Avenue
at Jefferson Avenue in the City of Fullerton where it ties into the
-12-
June 13, 1990
FbIlerton-erect Interceptor Sewer, which was completed in February 1988. Tact
December the Board of Directors approved a cooperative agreement with the City
of Anaheim for the construction of street improvements on Euclid Street between
la Palma Avenue and the 91 Freeway, providing for reimbursement of the cost of
construction of city improvements. The City improvements will be constructed
under Contract No. 2-26-3.
The Katella Relief Sewer, Contract No. 2-28, will direct flows to the
Euclid Interceptor Sewer from the South Anaheim Sewer between Euclid and Walnut
Streets, by constructing about 1/2-mile of sewer. The South Anaheim Sewer is
part of the overloaded Neahope-Placentia system.
The Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29, will also help to
relieve the Newhcpe-Placentia system by diverting flows to the Santa Ana River
Interceptor line from State College Boulevard.
Staff recommends approval of the plans and specifications for Portion of
Euclid Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-26-3, Katella Relief Sewer, Contract
No. 2-28, and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29, and authorization
for the General Manager to establish a date for receipt of bids. The engineer's
estimate for all of the work is $12 million.
9(r) : AUTHORIZING EKHCMTON OF AN AGREENERr WITS KRAEMER IMPERIAL ASSOCIATES
PERTAINING TO REALIGEMU OF A PORTION OF CYPRESS AVENUE SUOrRUNK SEWER,
CONTRACT NO. 2-9, INCLUDING EASEMENT EXCHANGE.
County Sanitation District No. 2 (CSD 2) owns an easement for the Cypress
Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9, constructed in the 1960's. Kraemer
Imperial Associates, Omer of a parcel recently developed on the south side of
Imperial Highway, west of Kraemer Boulevard in the City of Brea, has realigned
the sewer within their development, Contract No. 2-9A, at no cost to the
District, and granted an easement to the District for the new alignment.
Kraemer has requested CSD 2 quitclaim the old easement to them.
The recommended action is to authorize execution of an agreement between
Krae er Imperial Associates and CSD 2, providing for the transfer of title in
the new Line and authorizing execution of a quitclaim deed releasing CSD 2's
interest in the old easement.
9(s): AUTHORIZING COLLECTION OF UNPAID CONNECTION FEES FROM SENCO DEVELOPMENT
AND BRISTOL LANE ASSOCIATES.
Ito developers within the District processed development projects within
the City of orange which inadvertently failed to collect connection fees due for
the projects. The District staff and the City staff have been in contact with
the developers and each of these have refused to make payment of the amounts due
and owing for the connection to the District facilities. While the District has
a variety of remedies including the ultimate of causing the disconnection, the
General Counsel has reconvended that at this time action be taken to file a
complaint in the Municipal Court to seek recovery of the unpaid amounts from
Banco Development, in the amount of $7,038.00; and Bristol Lane Associates, in
the amount of $11,593.81. The General Counsel's recamiendation is attached to
the supporting agenda documents.
-13-
June 13, 1990
DISTRICT 3
9(t): APPROVE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF CITY OF CYPRESS TAX PASS-THROUGH
AGREEMENT.
The Redevelopment Agency and the City of Cypress have approved
development plans over the past several worths for approximately 500 acres
within District 3. These plans are known as the Los Alamitos Race Track and
Golf Course Redevelopment Project and the Lincoln Avenue Redevelopment Project.
Typical redevelopment agency tax increment financing has been proposed for both
Project areas.
Pursuant to Board policy, staff has corresponded and net with
representative of the Redevelopment Agency and their consultant to negotiate for
a property tax pass-through. We have agreed to a partial pass-through of the
increment of ad valorem taxes.
The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the letter
from GRC Redevelopment Consultants, Inc., consultants to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Cypress, approve an agreement with the agency for pass-
through of 35% of the historical District 3 share of the property tax within the
Ins Alamitos Race Track and Golf Course Redevelopment Project; and to adopt a
resolution electing to capture the 2% annual inflationary increase in taxes
allowed by Section 33676 of the Health and Safety Code for the Lincoln Avenue
Redevelopment Project.
DISTRICT 5
9(u): APPROVAL OF ADDENDUM NO. 1 AND AWARD OF SOUTH COAST TRUNK SEWER, PHASE 1,
CQTINACT NO. 5-35-1.
In April, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for South
Coast Trunk Sewer, Phase 1, Contract No. 5-35-1, the first portion of a new
trunk sewer serving the coastal development now in progress at the southeast
city limits of Newport Beach. The first phase extends southeast on the inland
side of Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) from the Newport Beach city limits to just
west of the entrance to the Ins Trancos State Park parking lot. The project is
ready to proceed, ahead'of the construction of the intersection of Pelican Hill
Road and Pacific Coast Highway. An easement is required for the construction of
the s tary sewer and The Irvine Company is dedicating the ease ant at no cost
to the District. This project includes approximately 4200 feet of gravity sewer
plus manholes and several hundred feet of stubs and laterals for future
Connections.
(1) Addendum No. 1
Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications to said project
clarifies the size and type of the various sewer pipes specified. It
clarifies pr,,visions in the detailed specification regarding traffic
control and restricted hours of work along Pacific Coast Highway
(PCH) . It also adds additional details concerning a new manhole to
be used as a temporary pump station for interim use by The Irvine Company
(to be paid by The Irvine Company) until after the proposed sewer through
Corona del Mar in PCH (Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No.
5-34-3) is completed, and it provides for clarifications in the schedule
of prices.
-14-
June 13, 1990
(2) Award of Contract No. 5-35-1
On May 15, eleven bids were received for said project. The bids
ranged from a high of $1,384,105.00 to a lox of $880,066.00, submitted by
W. E. Ebert Corp. A complete bid tabulation is attached to the
supporting agenda documents.
Staff recommends award to W. H. Ebert Corp. for their lox bid amount
of $880.066.00. The engineer's estimate for this cork was $1,290,000.00.
9(v): APPROVI14G M 40RANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE IRVINE COP@ANY HE HAYSIDE
DRIVE TRUNK SEWER, PHASE 3, CONTRAC.r NO. 5-34-3.
As the Directors are aware, the development of the south coast area
within County Sanitation District No. 5 (CSD 5) requires the construction of new
sewer facilities including gravity lines and pump stations. Local sewer service
will be provided by the Irvine Ranch Water District (IHWD), but CSD 5 will
provide the regional collection, treatment and disposal services. The Directors
will also recall that U&M has previously entered into an agreement with CSD 5
providing for prepayment of connection fees and full payment for construction of
CSD facilities south of the City of Newport Beach boundary.
The remaining facilities to he awarded for construction within the city
boundaries include a gravity sewer beginning at Bayside Drive and Marguerite
Avenue, extending northeasterly in Marguerite to Pacific Coast Highway and then
southeasterly in Pacific Coast Highway to the City boundary.
South of the City boundary there will be three separate construction
contracts for the sewer facilities to serve the expected 2500 to 3000 dwelling
units and cammercial properties. The first of such projects, Contract No.
5-35-1, is being submitted to the Hoard for award under Agenda Item No. 9(u) .
The City of Newport Beach, by the adoption of Resolution 88-121, has requested
that the District not work in the Corona del Mar commercial area until such time
as Pelican Hill Road is open to traffic. Contract No. 5-35-1 will allow
construction of the sewer on the north side of PCH prior to the widening of PCH
and the construction of PCH/Pelican Hill Road interchange.
Between Marguerite Avenue and the south city boundary, the construction
of the gravity sewer facilities, generally in the center of Pacific Coast
Highway, have been the subject of numerous meetings with Directors, Council
members of Newport Beach, staff, utility companies, the Chamber of Commerce, the
IRND, The Irvine Company, and others. The construction in Pacific Coast Highway
will be disruptive to residents and businesses and the purpose of the meetings
was to develop measures to minimize that disruption. The plan generally
approved by most is to construct the sewer by tunneling in the camiercial zone
of Corona del Mar (Marguerite to Poppy Avenue), open cutting in the shallaest
area of Pacific Coast Highway (generally Poppy Avenue to Cameo Highlands
Drive), and tunneling in the deep areas south to the City boundary.
A memorandum that sets forth the basic understanding (M7U) between The
Irvine Company and the City of Newport Beach pertaining to the construction of
the sewer in PCH has been drafted. It includes an accelerated construction
period within the cmmercial area, but precludes construction between November 1
and January 1, during the holiday season. The Irvine Company commits to pay for
the interim mcdifi.cations of the CSD 5 Corona del Mar Pump Station to provide
for temporary service to the developing properties (the pump station will be
-15-
June 13, 1990
abandoned when all of the projects are completed) . The FDU has been proposed by
The Irvine Company and Director Sansone, who represents the Corona del Mar area �../
on the City Council, to assure affected parties of the intent of the proposed
construction of improvements to Bayside Drive Truk Sewer, Phase 3, Contract
No. 5-34-3.
DISTRICTS 7 AND 14
9(w) : FWMIVE, FILE AVID DENY AMENDED CLAIM SUBMITTED BY SOUTHFISI CALIFORNIA
EDISON COMPANY.
The Districts have received an amended claim (the original claim has not
been received and filed) from Southern California Edison Carpany dated May 18,
1990, for a 12,000 volt line that allegedly fused in connection with
construction of Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road
(and City of Costa Mesa Street Improvements), Contract No. 14-1-1B. The amount
of the claim is $4,328.74.
The routine action appearing on the agenda is to receive, file and deny
the claim and refer it to the Districts' General Counsel, liability claims
administrator, contractor and contractor's insurance company for appropriate
action.
DISTRICT 7
9(x) : INITIATE PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION] NO. 135 - WILLIAMS Ab MXATION TO
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7.
In February the Directors received a petition from Mr. and Mrs. Donald R.
Williams to annex 2.50 acres located in the vicinity of the southeast corner of
the intersection of Lemon Heights Drive and Inwer Lake Drive in unincorporated
County territory. There is one residence under construction, with the
possibility of another in the future for this parcel. The annexation would be
in accordance with the terms of the negotiated AB 8 tax exchange agreement with
the County of Orange for annexing properties. The local sewering agency is
County Sanitation District No. 7.
Staff recamcnds approval of the resolution included with the agenda
material initiating proceedings for said Annexation 135 - Williams Annexation to
County Sanitation District No. 7.
ALL DISTRICTS
11: NOMINATIONS FOR JOINT CAN.
As provided in the Joint Boards' Rules of Procedures, nominations for
Joint Chairman are made at the regular June meeting and the election takes place
at the July regular meeting. Nominations and election of the Vice Joint
Chairman will be conducted at the July regul& ^neting.
For new Direc —'s information, we have included below an excerpt from
the current Rules of Prwedures for meetings relative to the election of the
Chairman and Vice Cha;ruen of the Joint Administrative Organization.
-16-
June 13, 1990
T. Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Athministration Organization.
"A Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative
organization shall be elected by a majority vote of the Districts at
the regular meeting in July of each year. The nominations for Joint
Chairman shall be made at the regular Board meeting in June each
year, and the nominees nay prepare a statement of not more than 100
cords stating their qualifications for the office of Cho=r,man. The
statements shall be mailed to members of the Joint Boards of
Directors with the agenda and other meeting material for the July
regular meeting.
"The nominations for Vice Joint Chairman shall be made at the
regular Board meeting in July each year and shall be made
immediately following the election of the Joint Chairman.
"The Chairman and Vice Chairman shall serve at the pleasure of a
majority of the Districts. In the event the office of Chairman
becomes vacant due to resignation or retirement of the =mnbent
prior to the expiration of the regular term, the Vice Chairman shall
automatically succeed to the office of the Chairman and shall
continue to serve through the remainder of the regular term unless
sooner removed by action of a majority of the Districts. In the
event the office of Vice Chairman becomes vacant prior to the
expiration of the regular term, nominations and the election of a
Director to sere in that capacity shall be conducted at the next
regular Board meeting. The person so elected shall serve the
balance of the regularly scheduled term unless sooner removed as a
result of action by a majority of the Districts."
12: Fn*2ZIAL REPORT FOR NINE-MMM PERIOD ENDING MARCH 31, 1990.
Enclosed are the budgetary financial statements for the third quarter of
the fiscal year. The Joint Cperating Budget was reviewed by the Fiscal Policy
Committee on May 16, 1990. If any Director has questions pertaining to the
statements, please call Gary Streed, Director of Finance at (714) 962-2411,
extension 240.
13: APPROVING YEAR 6 NPDFS OCEAN M7NMRI14G PROGRAM.
As a condition of the existing five-year NPDES mean discharge permit,
jointly issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the
California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) , the Districts must
conduct an extensive monitoring program designed to characterize the effects of
our discharge on the ocean environment. In 1985 the Districts issued a Request
for Proposals to provide Docent Monitoring Contract Services for the Districts'
120-inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. 5-032. After evaluation of seven
respondents, the Districts entered into an agreement with Science Applications
International Corporation (SAIC) to provide these services for the five-year
life of the permit, and negotiated a fee for Year 1 (1985-86) in the amount of
$916,680.00. Between the initial contract and Year 5 (1989-90) the scope of the
monitoring program has been increased significantly to amply with changing EPA
requirements. The Year 5 SAIC effort is $1,609,570.00.
-17-
June 13, 1990
Enclosed with the supporting agenda documents is the report and
recamendation of the Selection Committee along with a detailed analysis of the
SAIC proposal for Year 6 (1990-91) of the ocean monitoring program.
in Year 5 the Districts' staff, with assistance from some other
independent outside firms, assumed a part of the monitoring program that had
been conducted by SAIC in Years 1-4. This resulted in a considerable cost
savings. The proposed Year 6 program shifts these tasks back to SAIC as in
Years 1-4 to allow Districts' staff additional time to analyze the data
collected. Although the Year 6 SAIC contract is proposed to increase
$211,795.00 to a total of $1,821,365.00, the overall monitoring program will
decrease $84,777.00, from $1,928,990.00 to $1,844,213.00.
14: REPORT AND RECOM4cLIDATIONS OF THE CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND REUSE
The Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee net on May 31, 1990.
Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on its discussions and
recommendations for consideration by the Hoards.
15: REPORT AND RECOM4M=CNS OF FISCAL POLICY AND EXECUPIVE M44 ITIEES.
The Fiscal Policy Committee and Executive Camnmi.ttee met jointly on
June 20, 1990. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on the
committees' deliberations and recamendati.ons.
16: PAYMENT OF cimm9 AFTER xm 30, 1990.
The individual District's 1990-91 Budgets will not be adopted until the
July Joint Board Meeting and, therefore, it is necessary to have Board
authorization for the payment of claims from July 1 to the date of adoption of
next year's budgets. It is recommended that this routine action, taken
annually, be approved as set forth on the agenda listing.
17: AUPAORIZING CONPINLUMON OF SPECIAL IABOR COUNSEL SERVICES OF ATTORNEY
LEE PATEPSON IN ASSOCIATION WITH HIS NEW FIRM. SONNENSCHEIN. NATH &
ROSENTHAL.
In 1985 the Boards of Directors engaged Mr. Lee Paterson of the law firm
Richards, Watson & Gershon to serve as the Districts' special counsel for labor
relations. On May 25, Mr. Paterson advised the staff that he is changing his
association to a new law firm, Sonnenschein, Nath & Rosenthal, and has asked if
we wish to continue his services with his new firm.
Mr. Paterson is the lead negotiator in the MDU process (the Districts'
current three-year MJUs with our five wplcyee groups expire in November 1990),
represents the Districts in labor issue leg..l actions, and also provides related
services in other labor relations matters. Stafc believes that Mr. Pate-� is
one of the top labor attorneys in the Southland and we believe he also enjoys
the confidence of the Directors.
Staff, therefore, recommends that the proposal enclosed with the agenda
material for continuation of Mr. Paterson's special labor counsel services in *ft.rl
.
association with his new law firm, Sonnenschein, Nath & Rosenthal, be approved.
Mr. Woodruff, the Districts' General Counsel, concurs with the recommendation.
-18-
June 13, 1990
18: AGENDA NOR CIOSED SESSION.
From time to time it is necessary for the Boards to convene in closed
session to consider purchase and sale of real property, potential or pending
litigation, personnel matters or other matters which are exempt from public
disclosure under the California Public Records Art. In order to avoid a
situation where a closed session is needed but does not appear on the agenda,
this standing item is placed on the agenda each month providing for a closed
session at the regular meeting, if deemed necessary by the Boards.
DISTRICTS 3 AND 11
34: AIRMRIZING SE=ON CO[MII= TO SOLICIT A PRCPMU AND MODTIATE
ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREQMENf WITH JOHN CAROLIA
E=EERS FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCPICN SERVICES RE SLATER AVENUE PUMP
S1P.TION SERAM SYSTEM MIROVEMEwS, CUNIRACP NO. 11-17.
Enclosed with the supporting agenda material is a separate Staff Report
to the Directors of Districts 3 and 11 regarding the proposed Slater Avenue Pump
Station System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17.
-19-
RE; AGENDA ITEM NO. 12 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
.1 ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA
IDem ewn AXINUE
May 21, 1990 - PO.Eon 8IE7
FOUNTAIN VLLLEV.CALIFORNIA 9E729.E121
nuiSw.¢An
Joint Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 6 14
of Orange County, California
Subjects Summary Financial Report for Nine Months Ended
March 31, 1990
Transmitted herewith is the Summary Financial Report for the past
nine months ending March 31, 1990, The statements summarize the
fiscal activities of the joint operations and the individual
Districts for three quarters of the 1989-90 fiscal year and the
status of each with respect to the approved budgets. The combined
1989-90 budget for all Districts is $315.7 million, of which
approximately 67% is for capital expenditures for facilities
improvements and additions, including reserves for said capital
projects. The total budgeted revenue and expense categories of the
several Districts are set forth below.
TABLES 1
COMPARATIVE BUDGET SUMMARY
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS)
INCREASE 1989-90
RDOUire ntR 1988.89A 1989-90A CREASE X OF BUDGET
JOINT TREATMENT WORKS 0. M & R S 35.9 $ 44.5 S 5.6 14.1%
COLLECTION SYSTEM & OTHER DISTRICT 0. M & R 5.5 6.9 1.4 2.2
TREATMENT PLANT CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATIONS 95.0 102.7 7.7 32.5
DISTRICT SEWER CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATIONS 50.6 60.7 10.1 19.2
DEBT SERVICE (G.O. & C.O.P.) 12 6 11.8 (0-8) 3.7
SUBTOTAL $
S M. $ 24_0 71.7X
. CONSTRUCTION RESERVES $ 124.5 $ 49.1 S (75.4) 15.6
OTHER RESERVES 38.8 40.0 1_2 12.7
SUBTOTAL 8 163.3 $ 89.1 S (74.2) 28.3%
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS $ 365.9 S 115.7 $ (50.2) 100.0X
FUNDING
CARRY OVER $ 32.0 $ 43.0 $ 11.0 13.6%
APPROPRIATED RESERVES 248.0 169.4 (78.6) 53.7
SUBTOTAL $ 28- $ 212.4 $ (67.6) 67,
TAX ALLOCATION 0% SHARE) $ 2a i $ 29.7 $ 1.6 9.4
TAX LEVY FOR BOND REDEMPTION 0.6 0.2 (0.4) 0.1
CONSTRUCTION GRANTS 2.7 2.7 --- 0.9
FEES 29.5 49.6 20.1 15.6
INTEREST & OTHER 25.0 21.1 (3.9) 6.7
SUBTOTAL $ 85.9 $ 103.3 $ 17.4 390
TOTAL FUNDING S 365.9 $ 315.7 $ (50.2) 100.0X
A ADJUSTED FOR INTER-DISTRICT TRANSACTIONS
030040
FIN/REPORTS90
Page 2
Included in each District's statement is a summary of the above
major income and expense categories and an itemization of their
trunk sewer construction projects and respective share of the
joint works expansion. Authorized general reserves and inter-fund
transfers have been excluded from the budget column on said
statements as expenditures are not charged directly against such
appropriations.
Summarized below are comments relative to the financial
statements. The statements are presented on an accrual basis and,
therefore, inter-district cash transactions for fiscal 1989-90
which were accrued in 1988-89 are not reflected in the
year-to-date balances.
CASH AND INVESTMENTS
Earned interest generated by our continuing program of investing
reserve funds (primarily capital funds accumulated for
construction of required sewerage facilities) is $13.4 million
through three quarters of the year. Virtually 100% of our funds
are invested in short-term government securities or time deposits.
We presently have our funds invested with the County Treasurer's
commingled investment program to take advantage of the higher
yields available.
JOINT OPERATING FUND
This fund accounts for operations, maintenance, and administrative
activities relative to the Districts' jointly-owned treatment and
disposal facilities. The JO expenditures along with the
self-funded insurance program costs are monitored by the Fiscal
Policy Committee and if some unexpected expenditures are
experienced they are reviewed by the Committee.
Salaries and Wages - Even though we have had to add employees,
there are several authorized but unfilled positions and, thus,
considerable payroll savings have been realized to date.
Employees' Benefits - Includes Retirement, Workers' Compensation,
Unemployment Insurance, Group Medical Insurance and Uniforms.
Unemployment insurance and other benefit accounts will continue to
recognize considerable savings because of unfilled positions
mentioned above under Salaries and Wages.
Chargebacks to Districts and CO RF - Payroll expenses are charged
back to CORP through the cost accounting system for work on the
treatment plants' capital expansion program, and to individual
Districts for work on Districts' collection facilities capital
expansion projects as well as maintenance and repair of said
systems. Also reflects industrial waste division charges to
respective Districts.
Page 3
Gasoline. Oil & Fuel - Includes all fuel for motor pool. A large
portion is recovered through our equipment billing system and
included in revenue below.
Insurance - Budget amount includes Board and staff out-of-county
travel policy, employee fidelity, boiler, fire, earthquake and all
risk insurance policies, and pro-rata cost of the self-funded
liability insurance program. Expense is in line with annual
budget.
Memberships - Includes the cost of membership in CASA, AMSA,
SARFPA and other organizations. Annual membership costs are
recorded when paid.
office Expense - This account includes various types of office
supplies, stationery and related items.
Chlorine and Odor Control Chemicals - Primarily for influent and
sludge odor control at treatment plant sites. The main chemicals
used to control odors are chlorine and caustic soda. Ferric
chloride is used as a supplemental odor control chemical, and
caustic soda is also used in air scrubbers throughout the plants
to reduce hydrogen sulfide emissions. New air scrubbers have
required an increased use of caustic soda.
Chemical Coagulants - Expenditures for this item are required to
dewater our sludges prior to disposal to comply with Regional
Water Quality Control Board requirements.
Other Operating Supplies - Miscellaneous items such as solvents,
cleaners, janitorial, tools, lab chemicals, etc. purchased
throughout the year.
Contractual Services - The major elements in this line item are
payments for grit and waste-activated sludge removal and disposal
at the BEE landfill and payment for off-site sludge removal and
reuse.
Professional Services - Primarily consists of General Counsel,
special labor counsel, audit fees, and miscellaneous
consulting services.
Printing and Publications - Includes all reproduction activities
in-house and with outside services and advertisements for
recruitment of staff.
Rents and Leases - Equipment
Outside Equipment Rental - Primarily for the rental of large
cranes and equipment necessary for removing and replacing
major pumps, engines and other large equipment during the
course of maintenance and repair operations.
Page 4
CSDOC Equipment Rental - Reflects the charges for
District-owned equipment used for overhead type activities.
There is an offsetting credit applied through the cost
allocation system for these charges.
Repairs and Maintenance - This item, which is for parts and
services for repair of plant facilities, reflects an authorization
to allow for routine equipment maintenance. Should this level
allocation prove to be insufficient in the event of major
unexpected equipment failures and/or repairs, a transfer from the
unappropriated reserves of the individual Districts would be
necessary to meet the increased obligation.
Research and Monitoring - Budget includes funds for the ocean
monitoring contract required by our NPDES permit. Other projects
include operational research and evaluation of processes to
develop optimum operating parameters, and also include the
Districts' annual share of participation in the Southern
California Coastal Water Research Project.
Travel, Meetings & Training - Major items are authorized by
specific Board actions. Expanding activities of regulatory
agencies. have required additional staff and Board travel.
Utilities - The major item in the Utilities Expense Account is for
purchased electrical power. Future expenses are expected to remain
within the budget limits, but will increase.
Other Expenses - For items not chargeable elsewhere such as
freight, safety supplies, etc.
Prior Year's Expense - This account is required by the Uniform
Accounting System and represents adjustments to an operating or
non-operating account balance from the previous year or payment of
charges which could not be accrued at year end. Generally, all
expenses to this account are recorded in the first quarter.
Allocation to Districts and CORE - This is an account established
in connection with the cost accounting system and represents
materials, supplies, and services overhead chargebacks to the
individual Districts and CORP.
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND
This fund accounts for the costs of expanding and improving the
Districts' jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities and
represents an average of 37.9% (including reserves) of each
District's budget requirements for 1989-90. During the past
nine months, $43.9 million was expended on joint works treatment
and disposal facilities improvement and expansion projects. The
pro-rata share of joint works improvement and expansion costs is
reflected in the financial statements of the respective Districts.
Page 5
INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS - The statements reflect the accounting
transactions for the nine Districts and include each respective
District's share of the Joint Operating Fund and the Capital
Outlay Revolving Fund.
Taxes: Tax revenue is allocated to two separate accounts:
Tax Allocation - This account represents the anticipated
allocation of the Districts' pro rata share of the maximum 18
basic property tax allowed under Proposition 13. The
Districts average approximately 2.9% ($.029 for each $1.00) of
the basic levy.
Tax Levy - This account represents tax funds necessary to make
voter-approved outstanding general obligation bond principal
and interest payments. In accordance with the Jarvis-Gann
initiative, tax levies to satisfy these obligations are not
restricted. The 1989-90 levy was waived for District 7, and
debt service is being financed by interest on reserve funds.
Federal and State Construction Grants - EPA and SWRCB have
historically funded up to 87h8 of treatment plant construction for
approved projects. Budgeted amount is outstanding balance on
projects pending final EPA and SWRCB review.
Fees - All Districts now have an adopted sewer connection fee
schedule. This account also reflects industrial waste user
charges levied by seven of the nine Districts pursuant to the
Uniform Industrial Waste Ordinance and the Revenue Program, and
. the user fees implemented in Districts Nos. 1, 3, 5, 6, 11 and 13,
Annexation fee revenue is undeterminable and, thus, is not
included in the budgets unless there is an existing agreement
providing for payment of fees.
Sale of Capacity Rights - This account records income from sale of
capacity rights to outside agencies such as SAWPA, including the
capital replacement charge.
Joint Works Equity Sale - Revenue from the annual joint facilities
interdistrict equity adjustment required by the recalculation of
the respective ownership percentages. Cost of this adjustment for
purchasing Districts is included in each District's Share of Joint
Works Construction.
Share of Joint Works Construction - Represents each District's
share of joint treatment and disposal facilities expansion
discussed above under Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF) .
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense - Payment of principal and
interest on outstanding general obligation bonds and certificates
of participation of the respective Districts.
Page 6
Share of Joint Operating - Represents each District's share of
operating and maintaining the jointly-owned treatment and disposal
facilities, and administrative activities. Costs are distributed
based upon each District's respective gallonage flow (see Joint
Operating Fund statement for details) .
District Operating and Other Expenditures - Consists primarily of
individual Districts' general operating expenses; industrial
monitoring, operations, maintenance and repair of the respective
Districts' collection systems.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OAANK COURT
MANY JOINT OPERA7INB/NOItl IU CAPITAL ENP SUBSET REVIEW
9 MONTHS ENDED 3131/90
fdNIVEO
BUDGET PEAR-TO-DATE (DISPENSED YEAR-TO-RATE
IT" EXPENDITURES FORM IEIPEN0E0
L� SALARIES, RARB 0 BENEFITS
Solari.. 4 No. 11,530,000 12,338,433 5'"1'567 67.671
P+Yroll ROOM, 3,157,000 3,ON,337 2,076,663 9.731
TOTAL PAYROLL 23,617,00 13,616,770 1,0Eq,230 65.141
Less, Chor9esuts to DIM I CORP 16,000,0001 (4,10,723) 11,1 9,2n1 0.011
NET JOINT OPERATION PAYROLL 17,617,000 11,478,045 6,201,713 64.901
MATERIALS, SUPPLIES 6 SERVICES ---- ---- —_--_
Golding, Oil S Ofolel 250,00 120,034 129,966 48.011
Inlvaun 600,N0 449,742 ISO,= 74.161
Mes0ership, 30,000 14,814 15,126 49.391
OTYtn Esp,es 165,N0 139,301 25,699 84.4n
Chlorin,106v Cortrol 3,100,000 1,807,701 1,292,299 19.311
Chemal Coagulants 2,597,000 1,449,493 1,137,517 56.NI
Other Op hint Supplies 5n,000 441,959 133,041 74.861
Contractual 1erHps 6,920,000 4,141,511 2,671,447 60.731
Proi,s,imal Sorricas 330,N0 310,514 19,416 91.341
Printinq 6 Pu111oltion 243,N0 197,602. 47,318 MOST
Equippnt Asnlal 200,ON 154,337 45,u3 . n.in
RePoin 6 Road.m 3,763,W0 2,131,467 1,633,333 16.611
Resmch I Hanocrinq 2,070,000 1,423,544 646,436 61.771
Trust, Ao,ti08 E Iralsinq 123'"D 68,406 36,594 54.721
UncolleetWl, Account, 2,000 241 1,759 12.031
Utilitb, 7,220,000 3,775,212 3,04,780 N.291
Othor Eg0111 SIS,NO 104,246 110,754 70.49%
Prier Years E,peme, SO,NO 20,231 21,769 S6.461
No Opratie9 hpes,es 45,60 37,444 17,536 0.991
TOTAL NAIERIALS I SERVICES 28,114,00 17.ns,961 I1,6N,039 59.831
Gs,, ALLOCATION TO DISH I CCU 1350,N01 (450,2661 100,266 MASS
SIT JOIN OPEN RAIERIALS E SERVICES 29,544,000 16,B35,695 11,708,3N 9.III
TOTAL JOINT OPERATION EIPENSEI 46,231,000 21,313,740 17.117.260 61.241
NERVES
--Avenols 11,705,N01 11,162,9271 37,927 103.40%
Less, Allocatim to SIDES I CUSP 3.00 2,215 2,715 44.301
NET JOINT OPERATING R2VEIIS 11,700,0001 (1,160,7121 60,712 Y 103.571
NET JOINT OPERATING EXPENSES 44,531,000 26,553,on 17,977,172 59.6n
--_��-- --- --NALLONABE DATA --••--_______
-- A.B. ELM CHARGES
DISTRICT MOST _ TO DATE BUDNr TO SAFE
_-1 _ —�9,240 W7,362 4,092,ON 2'"1'521
2 N,ON 23,166 14,232,000 1,375,ON
3 31,BSI 23,690 14,137,009 9,564,443
5 4,560 3,594 2,026,000 1.275.03
6 5,021 4.149 2,587,000 11499,953
7 8,185 5,413 3,63B,N0 1,992.222
II 7,135 4,614 3,173,000 1,660,00
13 303 273 134,000 90,693
14 1.10 1,127 490,000 407,435
100,138 73,440 44,331,000 26,553,NN
COMITY SANITATION DISTRICT M. I
SDMMY MMX LY FINRNCIAL RUD17
9 namm ERMD S131110
MET REVIEW
1981.90 Avuldng laar-To-008 \ I
Budget Year-To-Oale Budoel 1 Expand
Beginning Fund Btlmny July 1 19,109,035 —�-- -_--�--_-
REVENUC9x _—
Tax Lwy (Bond fusels) onIV) 11,915 11,511 7,364 W.991
Tax AllerolimnJSubanliens (ohm of 111 1,924,40 1,07,072 Bs6,921 54.911
Fde,al art State Construction Bann 217,400 120,W6 1",344 42.01%
Comntnn Fee, 1,361,000 102,774 1,450,226 6.311
Other Fears 3,153,OW 2,106,073 1,446,927 62.451
Sib of Capacity Rights I59,Ond 0 489,000 Max
Interest L Die,. Receipts 961,On I,IJ6,775 (473,773) 149.511
Other 1,350,W0 0 1,350,OW 0.001
Total A...no. 10,113,173 5,134,861 5,309,01/ -_— 49.17%
.w..mm. �___ .a......... .........xx.
Total Anne,i Beginning Balance, 2/,213,896
EXPENDITURES,
She,. of Joint works Trot. Pint i Reserve, 13,911,OW /,378,/95 9,3W,303 32.1n
District Trunk Lnr Coast, L Reserves 2,221,000 0 2,221,000 O.WS
Bud lelinnnl and Interest Expense 2,411,073 1,017,433 1,394,442 42.111
She,. of Joint edit, Operating Ensm" 1,092,00 2,661421 1,430,479 65.041
Pm ind for Rei.bunennt Agrnomb 0 0 0 O.OM
District operating i Other En,idllurt, /19,000 2M,055 1d,945 64.131
Total Expenditures IB,II7.075 1,345,304 11,572,371 36.961
Ending font Bain... �_• 11,696,312 ��v..o. uY�•�•
FMILITIEB EMISSION --_� _—_--
Balance MJu.tsnla Transfer to Balms .
7NB9 i AMU... Find Assets 313IJ90
WMTROC710M IN PRoBMMa —__ -- ------ ---
(-16 SA/We, Rd Trans Modifications 0 621 621
Sub-Tut.l 0 621 0 - 629
Share of Joint Yorks 13,703,231 4,376,495 (67.1201 11,414,606
5ub-iot.l 13,903,231 .4,578,495 (67,110) -I6,/1/,606
COMLEIM PROPERTY, PLANT i EQUIP, - --- -A---'
Land no Properly light, 81,39B 81,39E
Collection Llse, rod Punt Ste,. 5,779,133 5,779,133
TrMOsent facilities 0 0
Disposal fullllin 11,593 11,593
general Plant ant Adoin. Foil. 35,256 35,231
Equity In Joint Treat.nl Fuil. 26,436,431 (29,141) 67,120 26,474,403
Other Assets at Cost L... Avert. 47,092 (12,312) 35,370
------------
fetal Property Plant L Equip. 46,294,924 4,537,663 ----- u 30,832,787
�e.as'
CM%Y SMITATIM DISTRICT M. 2
WWRY Out a PINMCIAL EMT
9 MMNS MUD 3/31/90
a= MOIM
IuMM nn•le•lale w%t t...wesd
hollarM face hh.ub Jul. 1 129,096,I1B
1ElFY0f51 --
Tu Ito, Iw man w1n 0 6 0 :.x:
lac MIM.t.."It, nwa lone» lac 7,9n,M0 5,21317" 2,669,284 uA:
PNral .M Sn.. wuLtl.. Y.n, 7%,%0 372,612 151,10 CAN
4nent.ee in, 1,909.00 3,1M,n1 1,386,172 11.7:3
Ater f.es 3,172,000 2,e%,3M ee1,632 4.311
Sole el Co.",treat. 1,349.000 0 1,319,000 :.at:
Interest 1 sex. exuese 3,192,OM 4,316,812 11.124,012, 12.:e:
Meer 0 0 0 4.3r
-----.---- ............
Total lai 21,333,w 13,911,33E 5,110,661 8.:::
u.......... ............
total Romanic. I 1%anelg balanced 145,011,111
E3PENDITMES,
Sex,at idiot Mn, Ira. rent I Ller.n Se,6%,Ado 12,621,110 11,7n,40 h.r:
District 11.1 Was. "In• I low,.. 27.on,ADo lo,3e1,»2 EA.7761461 a.%1
Teleran Enwn 1,1%,0M I,mtl,tll 2,199,011 . ;.an
barrel lent vac Ooorm.l W..n 11,232,010 1,371,aM 5,156.994 A.11:
Diet.Mf lr ow, I,an.l 19•euwu 0 0 0 0.%:
Olnct Sorrow, 1 %.a 4,xe11re. I,IM,OAd 1,379,IID 1%,U]I 1M.R1
Mal E.enOlwrn 11,%i,MO 31,276,255 M,la,163 C.M
......••••Enflnl had Mllnln .� 110,13/,1M .re..m..
FACILITIES EIMNSION
_.......ram........__.
Balou Mlualeaut. Tramlr le h.nu
711/M 1 Addition, Frod Man
COMn=lu to MO6M5f,
2-5-2 Drn9elDllte 111mi MIT 161 fIx NO 2:5
Soflom PIS ara"I 1,367 e.1,1
2-29 Oro9.w 0nxsew 18 SS,631 ::.In
2•21"tall.Saw Exllfaalnl 19,23E 1,M1 2e,20
hrw Gn,o PIS waster 5,613 18 Less
Plot M. 3 -snhf.erl Swem of e
Possibility Aesrt 4,361 %tore A.431
2-11.3 A. hoes hill., Mill War. Sa.x 11,354 623,253 Psi
2-I49 Rx2d1.Ron - WI 47,391 322,16E lae,237
Ietnn.soepl., Cali It SallMx 1
Slmtlo Structure Seim 3,1171
left Inlrnpour her irM SYI to 61....1I 2-6-2 2,00 I.W.
tn-1, 2a1-2, 2-n-1 hthd laurtnur SMI 5,991,043 9,0%,1% 15.%9.W
Ent INOMfalf lnnrtMlm 2.22 601,13E 6/,412 M5.3%
2-27 Se. Auden.A.11e1 Se.r, 313,1% I17,IM 47:.w
Oise a9 to Closed A. Mina 17 11
Sul 7,00,941 Iq]oI,STS 0 U.A\14
SMre of Joint Y.,a, 39,E%,926 12,521,360 II13,091 •32.131,IS7
Se0-To1al 39,697,926 12,621,30 IIM,O%I 3:.111,431
._.........
DDNPLETEI PAOPEAT1. Tom 1 EAUlp1
_----_--------_.------
Land ad Property Rt91t1 517,694 53%611
Oallactlon Linda ads stop Stna 62,234,609 12.29.M1
irritant facilities 0 0
Drupeel /uflilin 33,172 33.172
6nral Plot ad Main Total 69,913 69.913
Unit,In Met Trestawl Pail 73,103,639 IM,332I ta,O% IS.SM.316
Other A...to at Sol lac.Audit 214,100 19,339) 19,761
Total Properly Plot 6 Floes 185,335,995 22,1M,102 0 211.121.391
MNIY "DTA110 DISTRICT 0. 3 _
MOT WMIERLY FINANCIAL REN1T
9 FIRMS ENDED 3131190
--_ BWEO MIR ------- — _
1989-90-- Ro m" yea-le-Date
hipt 9w-rHata Mlet 1 E.PmaW
Igesn... No bltu0, ]ul7 1 --- II3,463,732
MENUESt
'•In L"Y I000 IOabl 011) 139,000 I441211 8.719 75.021
Ia AIIm.U0L5 ratim, (ewe N 111 10,171,000 616151151 1.10.m n.Ri
Fmon1 .o Std .Cootralim Ir.t. 858,OW 161-74 IW,126 42.111
Comatmi fees 2,60,0411 t.m.6W 1.3111.3" 0.961
Dior Fee. 9,6R,W0 6.621.0W 3.05.90 62.401
Sao 01 In L9 I"U. 1,40,000 a 1,4t5,M LWS
Inor"t t era. Saint. 3,121,OW e,217,1R I196,162) Im."I
atW 134,0011 a ht,aW 0.01
T0.19e.mie H,519,OW 19.2R.237 9 76.781 67.511
Iota P.'ou 11"oon, Btim[0 131,e0,94. •••,•••• -•• ��.e..
E PEWITWES:
• So..of Ant York. Trot. Plat 1 Rimnm k,H6,00D 11,IW,@ 0.:11.171 37.k1
hit rut Truk Senr Custr 1 So.,.. 23.163.000 1.012.:51 :1,;W,219 4.01
Inn kotu..mt no Interest 0gmee /,561,791 .8761Jll L:3.692 40.921
a..e1 Ina Wk. 0 eraio Dann. 14,136,000 I.W.60 ;5a1.a7 60.501
hone" for Imai..not Agrrronte 0 1 a 0.00
l.0rinl Oaraml 1 D6.r E.Pm01tu" 1,90,M M.950 1.M.0W 11.551
------------
bm1 hen"tmn M,70,79/ 16.463.e,1 }.:11,316 31.49%
(In,Fme Ia+un m.® IW,.W.91 ............ •........
_--"---_ — --------------------_-..---
MCILITIES EIPAn10N
PUntnm unor To ..--•.•-'-Wait
t7110 I am.t.m. •:IR ten" 3131190
....._.... -----------
CMUMIED IN MRMSS:
....................—...
1-I4-12 Cntrutor .11A:9. 322,9291
11-11 uaor P15 0a0"r- 3 1 it 99 19,:" 19,265
I-sm ion ae MMole,0 Miller Wir
1r0. Seer 31,06 11.:1 71,104
1-20-1 hller-xol"r 9nil Rod 3,9B,SM M.:67 4,90,633
S-11-2 Loon. 1dr,tgtor Boer 27,421 7.9" 51,423
4:4,V.ntori Wink Roliel 3-23 32,M 1.1:1 U,W3
1...th.. Sdoi" Cats Eul.akw -25,066 Mo 0,1"
Imn.Pis Yygrne 25,2W 00% 0,667
1-10 Ehwute Ov¢t Cmnati0 to Miat 2,071 2,01
SN-Torn 4,103,159 1.011JU a 5,135,910
9orr 91 Joni Yerb 93,060,051 II.729.2:3 :: Jlu SI,SW,10
14-1041 0,060,056 13.:W,1: .--:J,9R7 56,569,253
............
ImPiClEO FROPMIY, R6411 MIPS
--Lae nY Proo tY DISK, 210,231 280,231
Collorhn it... nF " Sto 55,313,312 55,50,312
I.nmmt f"'In" 9,922 9,922
9110m1 F11.1Ehes 38,419 20,019
Senora Plot no into Fail ID,20 161,335 1 /
E9mn it lout tnumnt Fail 81,BR.011 tO.:D -J`.:❑ 81,990,709 `+W
:low Aneh it Cost Le"Dort. 16,322 .27.0n 69,226
--___-...___
tihl Floral Plot 1 ERa9 185,131'"1 T1,6R.^I 0 199,759,219
[WXII IAYITAIIN DISTRICT 0. 5
9YMMY WMMY FINANCIAL R T
9 mm an 1I311M
am min
I96M Annular, Yair-T.-Ruu
bog Yair-b-0.t. bout I bwoa
Standing Fund BNnns,JNy 1 75,912,6M _^--
RVEWut I. Lan Mond FReaN mIV) Mum ki'm 9,ON 69.79E
IU AllsMioullaratlaF IMw N 121 2lik5,000 I,uO.MI 799,719 0.601
la.N ad Had Conrtnuim Bronu 161,M0 M,In 11.MS 11.971
Connotation Fix 0,00 M6,131 681,169 19.76E
Ott.Iw I,769,DM 759.666 kM,S36 60.01E
SNo a Capacity Rights 20,00 0 70,000 0.001
Inl.ast I TOM. bormt. 6n,OM 506.N0 u1,9M1 106.761
Olh. I,IL,OM 0 1,422,00 A=
Into Rnsw d,M$,OM I,Wdn 1,Su,0u Md01
Trial Puma L I"mim Saluu. ®• Ur416,03 e.veeN radrar
ElMm1yms. --
sous el ads Wort. Irat. Plonl I bww S,7AO,0M 1,36,M2 1,016.00 11.691
Buhi[l Truk Saw Cwtr A Aa.rn 2,M, M IIIJ47 I,M7.7u 6.41
Imo Rairswl ad iN.apl E.Paa M,OM M,Ma au M.731
bra al Jelnl Works Oh.rt1n Emanon l,oM,OM 1,595,6% n0.307 W51
humid 1. lamburatot Agnaiau 0 0 0 0.01
bOtriet bursting L MMr 4w01tura A90,OM ]IO,An 49,1M 60.6Et
Put" 4PU/lur.s 10,911,W9 6,031,SN 6,962,60 36.9t
Doing Fond blaw , arum 56,9M,W1 •vvvve. ..ern.....
--- FACILl71EB EVAMIOY ___---__---•`•--_--
-•_- --_ b1w. Adluawt. Trust. Is INUu
TIIIW A Additions Pinar Asia, 31311n
COMIRACr1AY IN MOMS:
5-39 Siphon Il honaia 4maing al BM In.
a sib Strait 51 6 Ion ITS
5-39 Man 516 Siphm 6 M.SM 11ptai/nl 2 1,366 I,3U
bit. M Pill Lusary Lt..b cram. SM 624 636
3-37-2 Iw.tion al PER Fla mi in.I 6 33,3u Arm
Truelllo.Us,A Corrosion Itay 5 16 5,042 16,717 71,7u
S-79 Caul Fern bin Rapunanl 31 6 6,916,3M 1303,95H 6,67E,151
RuPIai.Lido Force bin 5-26 6,3M 6,97
Cent Truk ft.. 1 2,M3 I'm
tut.Point PIS Ohara.M6 67,6tl M7 67,116
Sal hot Wion&of wart 0,Farm NNe 51 6 1.63A,3W 27,IM 1,09,296
S-17 blew Truk Bur Lido PIS I-V It PIS I2A,617 36,612 161,099
5-32 lilt.Pt A Ao[ky Pt Pig PM lour 5 1 6 21.6n 31,dn
Sat Russia,N Truk Mar I" Mow 1,1 13 91,931 SM.30 6I4,636
0-53 it,Arid,.PIS IRA, MpU 7,673 u.S70
5-35 b. but Truk bw-lul Maiai 16 1 n,3a 39,1M 103,693
Sa6 CgaN Con.PJS A,IM 6,907 0,091
Sus-Ioto 9,MI,3Y I81,167 _--0 -9,375•dl5
Mr.el ).lot York. 6,1u,OM 7,345,793 1u.9171 9,076,SM
ah-Iall 6du,OM 2,243,392 Iu.9171 9,076,5n
mum MOIFRI't, nMr A IWih
Land and ffmrt,Right, 4,231 6,331
Coll.tlon urns at Pup 5t.. II,W,677 II1165,677
t..giant F.Illtln 7,367 7,367
DUMuI ballliai 7,115 7,155
antra Plant as man F..0 76,01 76,051
Equity In Joist Trul om Fa[l1 13,047,817 116,796J 32.917 13,066,5M
Other RUN& at Cost Lw Amt. 2,016 II,S171 202
Ta,I Pnart7 Plant A Ea1P 40,194,3% 3,610,M3 --• 0 67,w4ju
WUnY SAYIIAIIN DISTRICT NO. I
SIIMMY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
N AOIIIM ERNEO 3/3I/90
---- BUO6ET RFNIEY
...............______
1189-90 Re.inl.q Yur-To-Ute
Bidd et yosr-Toiate ^Budget 1 E.pemm
Btllmm�9 Fund BA1met, Jcl/ 1 11,721.131
REYFNUES:
It, L111 (Bold Initial evil) 0 0 0 0.001
Ta, All.uttms/SUNYmllnn. (bar.W lit 1,271,010 110.211 L7,711 70.062
imer+l Ana State Coulr0dl9n Searle 133,M0 55.121 77,379 41.171
Connection Fees TELI 371,5O1 103,0" 68.401
Other Fees 2,241,000 1.411.511 761,422 65.761
Stl, m Cannty Rights S71,Om 0 226,000 0.001
let....t I nsc. Reosi of. 39,000 553,261 452,264) 110.431
Other 0 0 0 0.001
loin R'111.E 5,11390N ^3.321.46 1,719,510 --- 64.191
.a........
Iota( Revenue I Beginning blares 21.0N..19 .s.rt..ss^• .
IlPtmllmi —•Y•_•••
--•Intl el J11n1 Yrkt Tend. Plant L Anxves l,9/,90 2.131.112 3.421.70 38.191
0utnct Trunk Under Cancer 1 Reserves 3,279,000 t13A:J 3.163,49 3.521
Imo A.brtmnl And Interest Espmn 0 1 0 0.001
Lane .l Joint Yorks Operettas EM,Aws 2,587,000 1,191.153 1.011.041 57.981
Pro.lem for btiewtlunt Agrneents D 9 0 0.001
District Opxttiaq L Other F.poditorel 299,0m 121,992 110,001 61.801
Total F.Om0ltxos 11,712,000 3.69.mJ 1.623.133 32.931
Eat.,i.ea bids,., ....eve... •Il .U,..i ...A........ �YV•••
FACILITIES EXPAMIM
........................
Belem Adwt.m0 'q.er To WIMn
7/1109 1 VntAr. air" mots SAIMO
......... ............
CORTRUCII01 IN MOORE$$,
5-18 Siam at Proposed Cressing of Sell So.
.f its Street 5 1 6 393 393
5.39 Out, 516 Sieben 1 the SM SIphWPIt 2 72
letter M PIS teleselry Lin. bldellm 5 16 .11 219
5-37 Ingmlled Pill Plan 401 es.er 5 1 6 1.111 1,314
T... l... 0!x I Corrosion Study 5 1 6 3,042 UJIT 21,739
6.12 Farn,m Relief 59,40t lad 9,367
3.21 Caul Fern Win Rit lammat 5 6 6 U7,217 tlS,lge 351,219
little Point PIS Upgrade 51 6 17,149 132 17,31
3-31 Societe Prllms of Wsst Nay Force Rain 51 6 97,506 1.426 91,932
5-32 letter Pt I Wcp M PIS Ise 5 k 6 7,105 7,515
1/-Id A l l Water [ft.. 10.1-2 he. Street 0
Force Mai., Districts 6, 1If 1/ 69,164 10,619 III'm
Sam-total 622,984 113410 _ 0 79,496
..._....... ............
sore of Joint York. 6,911,7n 11111.:12 .31.m) 9,011,lb
Sue-tot. 6,911,726 2.111.212 Q1,Wl1 t,031,IW
-`-------- ............
COMLEnD MEE", PLANT I EIUIP,
-- Land and Property light, 362 SIT
Collection Leon mil Re"STAN 1^20 1,90,249
Tremont Facilities 2.69 2,69
Of,..ss1 Facilities I'm 7,9/
limited Plant at W.In Fact) 14,312 84,362
El.elr IN Jelot IreAR.nl Full 13,201,M 113.101 I1::2 13,222,=
Other Assets at Cost Len effort. 20.92 ,7,911, 12,331
.....�..�. ........._.
total Timers Plant I Epip 22,211,207 7.211.a6 0 24,420,303
COMITY SNITATIN DISTRICT 0. 1
SIBNAAT OONATEALY FINANCIAL REPORT
9 RNTN ENDED 3/31190
- --__- mm NRIEA
- --- 1919i0 Re++ining Yur-T".to
Budget Year-lo-bte Budget 3 bsscd.d
\aaua� Beginning Fund Balances, July 1 55,676,49 _-'-
REVENN,
Its Lary Mind Food .) only) 0 0 0 0.001
its Ailxatims/Suh unllona (ber, of 111 3,960,000 2,449,271 1,310,737 At.=
Fadvcl and Stale Construction Brute IN,000 79,050 I08,9N 01.051
Connection Fiat 1,9a,N0 891,9N 1,041,013 45.911
Other Fees $16.00 593,291 (79,291) 115.371
Sale of Capacity Rights 311,00 0 321,00 S.N1
Interest 6 Met. Receipts 1,632,000 2,116,5N 1354,545) 113.111
Other 0 0 0 0.001
Total Amman, 1,557,000 6,101,146 2,334,154 ` 72.491
Tel ) Revenue 1 Beginning Babnces ®r� 61,121,6am ��Ne •o•�Y-
EIPENDITURNt
Sher, of Joint Barks Val. Plant R Inerm 1,193,ON 2,999,704 5,893,296 3L731
District frank Sower Co.tr 6 Reversed I6,I90,ON 1,126,163 15,063,637 6.961
Band btireesnl and interest bpou b9,20 344,365 224,923 60.491
Share of Joint Burls Operating Expenses; 3,631,W 1,962,212 1,6N,778 54.49%
Pro.Jdal for Ralatmmmit Agronomics 0 0 0 0.01
District Operating 6 Orono Eaponitleres 1,3N,ON 791,293 590,707 57.291
Tat+l b,ssdllurss b,673,211 7,214,747 23.421,341 23.621
Ending Fond Release, a®®• 54,513,09 �•®�• �••O0f•e
FACILITIES EVANIN
-__ Wax, Ageslmb Transfer To blot.
711/0 1 Addition, Flood Asset, 3131/90
-- N-1-1 Sunflower let SN Ile
7-I3 Coup.Relief Sum 0,330 00,330
Olaf 7 Initiated Properties Study 3,287 3.217
7-9 Fairview Subtrunk 321 521
7-12 bray 12 PIS Fit.Rain I24,336 124,336
7.11-1,1,7 AOandonsmit ad Radlfn of PIS 52,363 IN,136 U8,519
7-10-1 both Airport Oirvsion brat eee,pn 473 6N,S10
City it Drugs I.t+loot, 20,473 20,4/3
Whole Adj. Re Orange III. Ayot. 42,015 62,341 100,827
Rate Streit PIS 7-7 1,061.241 2,366 1,063,807
I4-1-1 A 1 B Sisley Int., 14-1-2 Baker Strait 0
Far. his Districts 6, 7 1 la Im,330 121,421 932,7S1
Serer Names ter Ent Tustin Specific Plan 17,798 17,791
Reconstruct Siphon at A.O. la 3,I32 3,132
0
Soh-Total 2.114,716 1,126,111 0 3,240,079
Share of Joint Yorks 9,IN1014 2,119,104 (43,9751 12,732,753
Sub-Tab] 9,777,020 2,799,701 (43,973) 12,752.M
COMPLETED PRNNIY, PLANT 1 EOUIP, •---- _•-
~Land and Property Right, 276,454 276,454
bllutkm Lim., and Paso Stu, 22,974,606 22,971,5b
Trsstunt Facilities 0 0
Disposal Facilities 10,712 10,702
0mml Plot and Adw F&W 13,334 15,334
Equity in Joint 7nat.0 Facil 10,628,551 (19,0971 43,975 11,653.429
Other Assets at Cast lss. burl. 213 1215) 0
total Properly Plat 6 Equip 33,811,6a 4,106,335 0 57,924,217
CpUMIr SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11
SVMARY WARTFRLY FINANCIAL REPORT
9 NONTIIS 00ED 3n1190
--------------- -__ ___-____------___--.-_---_----__�__�__-�
BUOSEI REVIEW
_________________----______ _- --__----__------_--.---_--__ ______-
1919-9C RemninS reu-Io-Otte
Budget Yar-To-Oats Budget C E.penned
B.p:nnmq Fund B+lantaa, My 1 33,936,851 _--_— ----
-----------
AEVENUES:
--la Len (Bond Panels) only) 26,00 13,916 10,060 61.221
IL Water.one150...Elan (MR. of 1%) 2,141.M0 1,173,620 665,310 68.921
lateral and Slate Cnatructus Brats 110,0M 79.139 130,141 42.031
Cmnntlon Fen 713,Oa 603,113 177,07 77.311
other Fen 2,10,OM 1,111,743 01,257 69.681
Sale 01 Capstalr elghh 321,000 0 324,OM 0.001
Imrnt I R1.,. Rneapt. 671,Mp 541.IN5 (63,103) 113.791
Other 4,52,400 0 6,5u.m 0.001
Total Rnarn 10,663,000 1,215.356 6.427,644 `39.613
Total Rmm .I Igiaasg pg.. ®• 0,152,211 •e•••e•~ ��®�
EVEnITURES: ---_--
Share .1 !there Orb U.S. Plat E Ressrnr 7,090,000 1.030.402 6.067.511 13.692
Sabra Ira6 Saar Cents, 6 NNW,. 1,554,400 ISM" 3.4201691 1.751
Iwo Returned and loternt Eager, 29,60 21.113 548 98.151
She,.of Joan Walk, Operating UP..... 3,175,000 1.6611.661 I,`06,910 52.541
hn.d" for RnirOwnnat Agranata 0 R 0 Mot
Butncl Operating 1 Other Eapudilorn 366,000 433,:21 130,679 76.912
Iola) F.padilern 11,622.60 3,:11:31 911261436 36.721
Enle9 F.., Saloan a>��e 36,156.007 •••••,,,� a®�,
FMIL171ES FIPNSIOY ---•-^--�_—�_��
Idan --- Ae1nlNata •••___• Ir..SW to lalane
711109 1 areaba. Fun belt 31311"
CONSTRUCTION IN FISHER%
11-11 Slater PIS Seago St. Irprdmat. 305 M.MI A,IN
So as Estrin, generator at Slater PIS 62 I1'a0/ 91,01
11.16 Ora Anne Trost So. Speak 122,469 5,311 171,2M
CEM bwartenta For Coral Trans 0
1 DOW CMsa 3,573 3,573
Slater Stalin Rotor L Pun Upgrade 76,970 36,170
Sul-Tent 863,381 10,:0/ W 0 9p6,00
Share el Met sort, 9,507,660 1,330.602 o44,4253 Q.Spli'm
5040.1 9,507,60 1.031,402 (44.6231 12,493,607
COMPLETES PROPERTY, "I I ERUIPI -- ----.T�long ad ad Property Rights 146,596 IM,9Y
Eellnt3pe Lien no Pan 56n 18,416,175 18,416,175
Irntent Fullitin 0 0
Disposal Fullitin 3,053 3,00
ganal Plat and Main Pa41 M,164 21,166
E9nt7 a least Irntunt Pont 11,071,282 lI/,:Ib e4,475 11,10.113
Other stelae at Ent Last Awl. 7,019
Total Property Plat 1 Solids 47,050,720 3,112,6M -------- 0 50,193,31E
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13
ID)MARY 91AUMV FINANCIAL REPORT
9 NMS ENDED 3/31/90
BUDGET MIXED
1989-90 Resainin Year-T"ate
Budget Year-To-Oat, Budget C Expanded
.� -__------- _-_____
Beginning Ford Balance,, July 1 7,627,107
REVENUES: ._—.._...
lie Levy IT and Fundls) only) 0 0 0 0.001
I,, Allocation,/$ahrentions (Shire of ITT 0 0 0 0.001
Federal and Slate Construction grants 3,000 1,502 1,490 50.07%
Connection Fees 2,275,000 2,122,370 152,630 93.29I
Other Free 315,00D 169,660 125,340 60.211
Sets of Capacity lights 3,000 0 3,000 0.00I
Internet L Mist. Receipts 610,000 599,294 20,706 96.611
Other 0 a 0 0.001
------•-- ......._.._ _..---•
Total Revenue 3,2D6,000 2,902,826 303,174 70.541
.........®.
*:!a] Revenue 4 Beginnin9 Balanced 10,529,933 r. .m..m®...
___________
RES:
:...m of Joint Yorks Truk. Plant a Rseerrn 5,029,000 57,012 4,911,98E 1.131
Oc,tricl trunk Sever Coheir 6 Rowrvie 4,910,000 0 4,918,000 MIT
Bona Retirement and Interest Expense 0 0 0 0.00I
Shea of Jowl warts Operating Expenses 134,000 99,e95 33,305 73.651
Provided far Reishursesent Agrseamts 0 0 0 0.001
District Operating L Other Expenditures 162,000 120,12 41,042 74.17%
Total Expenditures 10,243,000 273.065 9,967,135 2.69%
.—®- ---------- .........va.
Ending Fond Balances .m..®.env.
------—__.---_------ -__-----------------------------------_._....._.��__—
FACILITIES EXPANSION
_....___ _—__---_____________________-_----------__-____._.__—�—_
Balance Adlu,tmt, transfer To Balance
711/89 L Additions Fixed Assets 31311"
............
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS,
-____---________________
Share of Jowl Narks 179,13D 57,012 1835) 235,307
-___________
Se0-Total 179,130 57,012 (833) 235,307
__--------- -___________
COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT a EgU1P:
--Lod and Property Right, _-_— 0 0
Collection Lines and Pump Store 0 0
Treatment Facilities 0 0
Disposal Facilities 0 0
Soviet Plant and Refit Fact) 0 - 0
Equity in Joint treatment Facil 340,643 13621 835 341,116
Other Assets at Cost Less Avert 79,250 120,379) 5B,871
____________ ____________ -_.----
Total Property Plant A Equip 599,023 36,271 0 635,294
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14
81HHLM9 OIIARTEW FINANCIAL REM?
9 MONTHS ENDED 3/31/90
BMSET AEVIEY
---�_---_^^-- 1981-90 Regaining Year-To-Dace
Budget Year-To-Date Budget 1 Etpodn
BMtanoq Fund blocks, July 1 17.02,767 _-----
AEVFINES, --_
I. Ley (Sod Faod1,1 only) 0 0 0 0.001 -
Tac Alleuti olso ...twas 15Aer, of ill 0 0 0 0.DD1
Federal And State Costraction Ernst$ 156,000 63,760 90;240 42.151
IOND Fees 10,767,000 6,811.241 3.935,759 63.261
Omer Fine 0 I'm 11,63J1 0.00%
5,11 of Capacity Rights 267,000 0 267.000 0.001
iaterot A mac. Receipts 165,000 139,422 26,372 83.901
Other 330,000 0 530,000 0.001
Ida[ Aaoae 11,885,000 7,411,062 4,067,938 39.041
............ ..s®.ne....
Total Rams, A Beginning Dilate 24,659,829
EIPERMIRMS,
A %.a at Jowl Wks TrM. Plot 6 Reserves 3,845,M 2,05,3dt 3,349,632 12.691
District Tract Sam C...tr a Raurvo 7,118,000 2,523,109 4,594.991 35.451
So, :ettnant and talent Eepease 0 0 0 0.001
v, of Joint parts Operating Expenses 4",000 407 ass 62,565 33.151
+a Its Rmoraeut Agroonts 0 u 0 0.001
.ur.a Oparstug S Other &potlitoes 216,000 0,213 150,707 30.191
Total tpwgttwa 13,669,000 3,491.125 0.177,075 40.171
I'd,., face Into,. m®em I9,Iw./01 ............
_— FACILITIES EXPANSION
Balance Adnstents ianfar to Balance
7/1/69 i Addition Fun Asset, 3/31/90
....._.....
CONSTRUCTION IN RAIDERS:
'1e-I-1 A a B SWnr lat., 1/-1-2 like Street 0
Force ease, Districts 6, 7 a It 336,134 2,523.109 2,859,261
Raw St. Pup Station 7-7 2,657,211 0 2,637,210
Mu St. Pup Satin Iproveeots 1-0-1 w w
So-peta] 2,993,372 2,523,1/9 --_----_ 0 5,516,521
Share of Joint pike 7,840,373 2,191,366 •--(36,5811 10,299,162
Sep-Tol1 7,840,375 2,495,368 (36,3B1J 10,299,16E
CBNLETEI PAMERTY, PLANT a EQUIP: ----- ----- -___�- _---
Lug w, Prperty Rights 0 0
Collnttw lwa ad Pup Stet 4,752,737 4,732,737
,ratings Facilities 0 0
Disposal Facilities 0 a
Seseral Plot fed Again Ficil 0 - 0 --�
Equity ,n Jowl Iroteeat Fail 14,979,819 ,15,665) 50.591 15,004,313
Other Assets at Cost Us, Asset. 85,937 122,0w1 63,839
lot,) Property Plot A Equip 30,652,240 4,980,534 0 35,632,774
RE : AGENDA ITEM NO. 13
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
®Ft P.O.BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
108C6 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALFORNIA 92708-7018
(714(962-2411
May 23, 1990
Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1,2,3 ,5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
RE: Report and Recommendation for Year 6 NPDES Ocean Monitoring
Program (1990-91) and Certification of Negotiated Fee for
Amendment No. 7 to Agreement with SAIC for Ocean Monitoring
Contract Services for Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall,
Specification S-032.
Background
As a condition of the existing NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit jointly
issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the
California Regional water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) , the
Districts must conduct an extensive monitoring program designed to
characterize the effects of our discharge on the ocean environment.
This permit, issued in 1985 for a period of five years, was
administratively extended by EPA/CRWQCB pending a decision on the
Districts ' application for renewal of the permit which was authorized
by the Boards last July.
In 1985, the Districts issued a request for proposals to provide ocean
monitoring contract services for the Districts' 120-inch ocean
outfall, Specification No. S-032 . After evaluation of seven
respondents, the Districts entered into an agreement with Science
Applications International Corporation (SAIL) to provide these
services for the five-year life of the permit and negotiated a fee for
Year 1 in the amount of $917, 680.
At the time of the original contract award it was noted for the
Boards ' information that the requirements of this unprecedented
monitoring program had been established by the EPA and that it was the
first of its kind. Although the EPA had yet to fully define all of
the work to be accomplished, the NPDES Permit required that the work
commence immediately. Because of this, it was anticipated that as the
program proceeded and the requirements were refined it would be
necessary to modify the contract to provide for the changes that would
Boards of Directors
May 23, 1990 --
Page Two
�r
be required by EPA. Accordingly, the contract was increased to
$940, 486 with the addition of Amendment No. 1 for relatively minor
changes in the scope of work. Amendment No. 2 was executed upon
initiation of the EPA-required ocean current study which amended the
total cost for Year 1 to $1,002,705.
In Years 2, 3, 4 and 5 the total was increased by addendas 3 through 6
to $1, 530,486, $1,707,294, $1,942,265 and $1,928,990, respectively.
The changes for Years 2-5 included significant increases in the scope
of work required to be performed to better document the environmental
conditions in the vicinity of the Districts' ocean outfall. The Year
5 program also shifted some of the tasks from SAIC to the Districts
and other independent outside contractors that resulted in an overall
cost savings.
The proposed Year 6 Ocean Monitoring Program shifts all tasks back to
SAIC as in Years 1 through 4, to allow Districts' staff additional
time to analyze the data collected. Although the Year 6 SAIC contract
will increase $211,795, from $1, 609, 570 to $1,821,365, the overall
monitoring program will decrease $84,777, from $1,928,990 to
$1,844,213.
Staff has found that by shifting those tasks removed from the SAIC
contract in Year 5 back to SAIC in Year 6, additional analysis and
evaluation time for staff scientists would be realized. In addition,
through negotiations with SAIC, substantial reductions in the cost of
the overall program can be realized in Year 6 even with the inclusion
of $48,652 for four additional special reports and the incorporation
of two additional analytical techniques.
The two analytical options are necessary to answer questions raised
during scientific review of the Districts' Annual Report; and the four
"white papers" are necessary to verify the rational behind proposed
monitoring program reductions. These program reductions have the
potential to further reduce the cost of the ocean monitoring program
by more than $140,000 per year.
The attached staff report details proposed Amendment No. 7 to the
Agreement With SAIC for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for
Districts ' 120-inch Ocean Outfall, Specification 5-032, including
modifications to the tasks for water quality sampling and analysis,
benthic bio-accumulation, computer data submission, October 30 annual
data submission report, the two options for water column
chlorophyll/BOD analysis and fish tissue PCB cleanup, and the four
"white paper" reports. Under the proposed program, staff will assist
SAIC in the collection of water samples during the monthly and
quarterly cruises so that the water mass can be sampled within a 12
hour period.
..r
Boards of Directors
May 23, 1990
�.. Page Three
The overall Year 6 program is summarized as follows:
SAIC Year 6 Program $ 1,772,713
SAIC Options 14,304
SAIC White Papers 34 .348
SAIC Total Year 6 Contract (Amendment No. 7) $ 1,821, 365
Staff Activities 22 ,848
Total Monitoring Program $ 1,844 ,213
This staff recommendation has several advantages. First the technical
strength of the program will be maintained while allowing staff .
scientists opportunity to adequately review data generated. Second,
staff and SAIC will work together to improve the water quality portion
of the monitoring program. Third, SAIC and staff will produce
documents that will validate recommended improvements to the marine
monitoring program with a potential future savings of over $140, 000
per year. Lastly, this overall Year 6 monitoring program represents a
decrease of $84, 777 (4. 6%) from the Year 5 program.
Certification of Negotiated Fee for Amendment No. 7
to SAIC Ocean Monitoring Contract
The Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee for Amendment
No. 7 to the Agreement With Science Application International
Corporation (SAIC) for Ocean Contract Monitoring Services for
Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. 5-032, in an
amount not to exceed $1,821, 365, as follows:
Amount
Offshore Water Quality $ 243,289
Benthic Monitoring 762,278
Trawls 188, 646
Rigfish 53,983
Data Summary & Interpretation 322,708
Additional Services 62, 692
Options and White Papers 44,769
Profit 143 , 000
Total Amendment No. 7 $1. 821.365
The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated
fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee
will not result in excessive profits for the contractor.
'v
Boards of Directors
May 23 , 1990
Page Four
w i
RECOMMENDATION
The proposed program is in accordance with EPA and CRWQCB policies.
The Selection Committee recommends approval of Amendment No 7 to the
SAIL agreement and for SAIC and Districts' staff to conduct the Year 6
(1990-91) NPDES Ocean Monitoring Program as described above and in the .
attached staff report.
ISI A.B. "Buck" Catlin ISI William Mahoney
A.B. "Buck" Catlin William Mahoney
Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman
ISI Richard B. Edgar ISI Don E. Smith
Richard B. Edgar Don E. Smith
Past Joint Chairman Past Joint Chairman
ISI Don R. Griffin ISI Blake P. Anderson
Don R. Griffin Blake P. Anderson
Past Joint Chairman Dir. of Technical Services
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
al ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
I0944 ELLIS AVENUE
RO.9Ox 6 21
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92129-9127
(7141962.2411
STAFF REPORT
Year 6 Ocean Monitoring Contract:
Amendment No. 7 to Contract With SAIC
Ocean Monitoring Services Specification No. S-032
April 27, 1990
INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY
In August, 1985, the Districts entered a one year agreement with
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIL) to perform
the marine monitoring activities required by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Regional
Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) as part of the Districts'
301(h) ocean discharge permit. The agreement has been modified
and extended by Board actions through Year 2, Year 3 , Year 4 and
Year 5. The Year 5 monitoring contract ends June 30, 1990.
In August 1989, the Districts submitted an application for
renewal of the 301 (h) ocean discharge permit. The application is
under review by EPA at this time and until a decision is made on
the application the Districts' permit including its ocean
monitoring program has been administratively extended under the
existing terms and conditions. Because the ocean monitoring
program will remain essentially unchanged, staff requested a
proposal from SAIL to perform the ocean monitoring tasks for
Year 6 (July 1, 1990 through June 30, 1991) .
For Year 6, SAIC submitted their original proposal (hereafter
referred to as Year 6(1) ) on April 10, 1990 for continuation of
their role as the major contractor through the sixth year of the
Districts ' ocean monitoring program. Following meetings with
Districts ' staff, SAIC submitted a revised proposal on
April 23, 1990, (Year 6(2) ) and additional options requested by
staff were submitted on April 26, 1990. The Year 6(2) proposal
reflects an SAIC cost increase over the Year 5 contract because
tasks performed by the Districts in Year 5 have been assigned
back to SAIC.
To put SAIC's Year 6(2) proposal in perspective, it is compared
to the initial Year 1 proposal costs from the four qualified
vendors that responded to the original RFP in June, 1985 and SAIC
costs for Years 1 through 5 are shown in Exhibit 1. The overall
scope of the ocean monitoring program has increased significantly
�. 1
during the last five years. However, the costs are still
comparable to those of the other vendors' initial proposals when �..r
the scope of work was less than it is today.
A detailed cost comparison of the Year 6 (2) proposal with Years 1
through 5 are presented in Exhibit 2. Also shown, for the
Director's information, are SAIC's preliminary proposals 5(1) ,
5(2) and 5(3) for last year (alternative 5 (3) was ultimately
selected for SAIC's work supplemented by CSDOC staff and
subcontractor work) . Exhibit 3 graphically displays the major
categorical costs for Year 1 through 6. Also presented in
Exhibit 3 are the costs associated with the optional studies
Districts' staff recommends as essential to adequately document
the effect of the Districts' discharge on the marine environment.
EVALUATION
A major cost increase in Year 6 for SAIC's work is a result of
the Districts' transferring responsibility for the water quality,
the computer data submission to the federal network (known as
"ODES") , the October 30 annual data submission and benthic
bioaccumulation portions of the program back to SAIC. These
tasks were assumed by the Districts' staff and often outside
contractors for Year 5. Therefore, for the sake of a valid side-
by-side comparison, the Year 5(1) SAIC proposal should be
examined with Year 6.
There will still be some minor Districts' staff involvement. For
instance, because it is staff's intent in Year 6 to work with
SAIC to obtain the most scientifically valid water quality data
possible, and it is scientifically desirable to obtain the water
quality samples within one tidal cycle (approx. 12 hours) in
order to fully understand the water mass, the Districts and SAIC
will work together, using two boats, to collect all station
samples in a timely manner.
An evaluation and comparison of program costs from Year 5 to
Year 6 follows:
SAIC's Comparison of Year 5 and Year 6
SAIC submitted their first proposal on April 10, 1990 and their
second proposal on April 23, 1990. Exhibit 2 shows the major task
costs of Proposal 6 (1)- and 6 (2) compared to Year 5 Proposals
5 (1) , 5(2) and the final cost of the Year 5 program, 5(3) . It is
necessary to compare the Year 6(2) proposal to the Year 5(1)
proposal because portions of the monitoring program were removed
form the Year 5 (2) and 5 (3) proposals due to a shift in
monotoring task responsibility. The Year 6(2) proposal reflects
a sift of responsibility for those tasks back to SAIC.
2
The increase in Year 6 of $243,289 for the water quality portion
of the monitoring program as compared to Year 5(3) is because the
Districts' staff assumed this responsibility in Year 5. SAIC
will reassume responsibility for sampling and analyses of water
quality in Year 6, with Districts' staff providing short-term
sampling assistance in order to sample the required stations in a
single 12-hour period. The proposed water quality program in
Year 5(1) , minus the ocean currents, equals $244 ,580 which is
actually 0. 5 percent higher than the Year 6 proposal for the same
program.
SAIC has proposed, at the request of Districts' staff, additional
data and program management reports and quality assurance in the
water quality, benthic, trawl and rigfish tasks of the monitoring
program. There were $25, 011 and $9,546 increases in the benthic
and trawl tasks, respectively, compared to 5 (3) , due primarily to
the above mentioned requested items.
SAIC Proposal 6(2) data summary and interpretation reflects an
$165, 109 decrease in this task from Year 5(3) when SAIC anc
Districts' portions of this task are combinined, even though SAIC
has resumed the ODES data submission and October 30 Annual Report
portion of this task.
The total Year 6(2) Proposal is $1, 772,713, for the basic program
minus the options, which is a $163 , 143 increase over SAIC
contract 5 (3) . As explained earlier, this is primarily due to
SAIC resuming the water quality task and ODES data submission
responsibility. The optional studies are discussed in the next
section.
The overall Year 6 program is summarized as follows:
SAIC Year 6 Program 1, 772,713
SAIC Options (chlorophyll/BOD & PCB Cleanup) 14, 304
SAIC White Papers 34 , 348
SAIC Total Year 6 Contract (Amendment No. 7) 1, 821, 365
Staff Activities 2 ,848
1, 844 , 213
Optional Studies
Districts ' staff solicited from SAIC proposals for additional
services that are essential for understanding the effect of our
effluent on the marine environment and for improving our
monitoring program to supplement the information in our pending
301(h) ocean discharge permit renewal. In order to answer
questions raised in the Districts' last annual report, staff
requested analyses of 1) water column chlorophyll and biological
oxygen demand (BOD) ; and 2) additional analytical work on tissue
samples. In addition, a series of "white papers" were requested
to validate Districts' staffs position that some parameters
being measured are not necessary and, thus, not the best
3
expenditure of monitoring dollars. -
Chlorophyll and biochemical oxygen demand will be measured to
determine whether there is a change in phytoplankton
productivity in the area near our outfall because of nutrient
enrichment caused by discharge. The quarterly water column
chlorophyll and BOD analyses will cost $12,956.
An additional laboratory procedure is necessary to acquire a
lower detection limit for PCB in fish tissues. The Districts
have received suggestions from the scientific community that this
will make the data more meaningful. This cleanup procedure will
cost $1, 348.
The optional "white papers" were requested in order to provide
information to EPA and CRWQCB to justify the reduction or
elimination of portions of the marine monitoring program that
produce little or no useful data. We are hoping that the
amendment to the program will occur when a new permit is
eventually issued by EPA. The four, 20-40 page "white papers"
will cost the Districts' $34, 348. The potential savings to the
Districts for eliminating these subtasks will be approximately
$150, 000 per year. More important is to have the scientific and
regulatory communities agree that these changes will lead to an
improvement in the overall ocean monitoring program.
Transfer of Water Duality and other Prolect Tasks
from Districts' Staff back to SAIL
The Year 6(2) proposal, including options and Districts' staff
costs for water quality assistance, shows an overall $84, 777
reduction from the Year 5 total costs. Districts' staff, under
this proposal, will relinquish responsibility for the water
quality, ODES data submittal, October 30 data submittal and
benthic animal tissue bioaccumulation portions of the marine
monitoring program. The following paragraphs discuss the
rationale behind, and advantages of, allowing SAIC to reassume
these tasks.
The water quality task consists of collecting samples for a
variety of water quality parameters at nine monthly stations and
17 quarterly stations and characterizing the currents around the
outfall. Districts assumed the responsibility for this task in
Year 5 to:
1) Use the Districts' superior oceanographic
instrumentation
2) Reduce the overall cost of this task
In this past year SAIC's subcontractor has purchased identical
instrumentation and is now conducting intercalibration exercises
4
with Districts - staff. Districts' staff have found that they
were spending too much time collecting data and too little time
analyzing and evaluating those data. Districts' staff will
assist SAIC in completing the water quality surveys in one tidal
cycle which will provide more useful data-sets for subsequent
analysis. However, the majority of the collections and all of
the analyses will be conducted by SAIC. '
Districts' oceanographic staff are reviewing the last 5 years'
current metering data to determine if additional information is
needed to characterize the circulation patterns in the Districts'
discharge area. If additional current data are found to be
required to aid in the understanding of the water mass and
effluent plume, staff will return to the Board with a proposal
for additional work.
Assuming insufficient benthic animal tissue for bioaccumulation
will be successfully collected because of its sparseness, (as has
been the case for the last 5 years) , SAIC has reduced their costs
significantly. The reduction has gone from a Year 5 proposal of
$59, 723 to Year 6(2) proposal cost of $4, 029. Districts' staff
assumed this task in Year 5 reflecting the 610" in the Year 5 (3)
proposal. The Districts budgeted $14,400 for staff activities
for this project in Year 5. The Districts will request that EPA
eliminate this task because not enough animal tissue for analysis
can be "reasonably" collected with a reasonable level of effort.
The third and forth tasks, quarterly ODES data submittal and
October 30 annual data submission tasks, were assumed by the
Districts in Year 5. Districts' data management system is now
compatible with SAIC's system. The task of submission of the
data can be handled by SAIC with Districts having complete review
and control capabilities without having to do the necessary but
tedious data entry. This will allow Districts' staff scientists
additional time for analysis and interpretation.
SUMMARY
The SAIC contract for Year 6 will increase from $1, 609, 570 to
$1, 821,365. This represents a $211,795 (13%) increase.
However, the overall ocean monitoring program as proposed,
including options and Districts' staff time for water quality
sampling assistance, has been reduced from $1, 928, 990 in Year 5
to a total of $1,844,213 for Year 6. This represents a $84,777
(4. 6 percent) reduction from Year 5.
5
The overall program cost comparisons are summarized below:
Year 5 Year 6
SAIC Year 6 Contract $1, 609,570 $1,821, 365
including options
Staff Sampling Activities $ 319 ,420 $ 22 ,848
S 1.928 .990 $1,844 , 213
Included in the above mentioned costs are options not required in
the Districts' NPDES permit but considered essential by
Districts' scientific staff to improve the overall monitoring
program. These options will provide justification to EPA for
additional savings in future marine monitoring years.
Staff will continue its quality oversight of the contract and
will assist and encourage SAIL to produce useful scientific
products, including publications in peer-reviewed literature.
Staff will work with SAIC to encourage EPA and the California
Regional water Quality Control Board to change the marine
monitoring program and improve our understanding of the discharge
area and its impacts on the marine environment.
RECOMMENDATION
SAIC continues to provide competent ocean monitoring services to
the Districts. Staff recommends that the SAIC contract be
amended (Amendment No. 7) to include the tasks for water quality
sampling and analysis, benthic bioaccumulation, computer data
submission and the October 30 annual data submission. Staff
further recommends that the options detailed in this report be
added to the SAIC contract and extend the contract as amended to
include the Year 6 period for a total of $1,821, 365.
Staff further recommends that Districts assist SAIC in the
sampling of the monthly water quality stations in order that
collection be completed within a 12 hour period. Exhibit 4
shows Districts' estimated sampling costs.
6
EXHIBIT 1
COST COMPARISON OF SAIC CONTRACT HISTORY AND OTHER "LIFTED
VENDORS BIDDING ON INITIAL YEAR 1 CONTRACT
OrigiMet Year Proposals
Ki nnetic Lab/ Brow b Science Applications Increase
K.P. Lindstrom, ECD Calduell International Corporation (Decrease)
Year 1 Year 2 you, 3 Year 4 Year 5(3) Year 6(2) Year 5 to 6
Offshore Water S 282,078 S 672,471 S 4"'181 S 136,675 S 391,225 S 394,252 $ 558,704 0 S 243,289 S 243,289
Duality
Benthic 632.001 901,157 706,465 402,297 530,798 582,342 708,199 737,267 762,278 25,011
TrauMs 85,352 92,121 121,778 79,328 105,922 115,576 143,746 179,100 188,646 9,546
Rigfish 54,768 22,142 32,875 20,915 31,614 34,271 39,976 54,236 53,983 ( 253)
Data Summary 413,670 484,402 385,804 162,634 247,075 274,576 342,680 410,567 322,708 ( 87,859)
Interpretation
Additional 45,824 21,414 23,846 30,079 39,394 48,723 60,660 89,909 62,692 ( 27,217)
services
options end 0 0 0 82,593 56,909 131,276 76,399 12,264 44,769 32,505
Contingencies
Profits 0 0 0 87,824 128,549 126,276 11,901 126,227 143,000 16,773
Prime Contract $1,513,697 $2,193,707 $1,736,949 S1,002,705 51,530,466 $1,707,294 51,942,265 51,609,570 51,821,365 S 211,795
costs
Diet. b Cont. 0 0 0 0 D D 0 319,420 22,548 ( 2%,572)
costs
Total Program $1,513,697 $2,193,707 $1,736,949 $1,002,705 $1,530,486 31,707,294 $1,942,265 $1,928,"0 $1,844,213 (S 84,777)
• includes options, contingencies and profits
MM:au
REF N920097.XLS
EXHIBIT 2'
_ Increase
_ (Decrease)
TASK/SUBTASCS Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 (1)Year 5 (2) Year 5 (3) Year 6 (1)Year 6 (2)Year 5-6
A. OFFSHORE WATER QUALITY MONITORING Cost ($)
Monthly Chemical & Physical SarpLing 66,94 123,662 126,55 141,035 148,01 148,01 0 68 593 68,581 68581
Monthly Bacterial Sa HrI; 12 120 8,51 9,04 43,011 30,2 23,22 0
Quarterly Chemical & Physical Sampling 25 523 54 417 55 964 71,9 66,33 66,09 0 32,5 33 465 33465
Ocean Current Monitoring 32,08 204,62 201,904 291,41 301,03 204,61 0 0 0
Coliform SupLing Charges 0 0 0 11,25 0 0 0
Analyses 46,854 46.854 46.854
MO/Quarterly Re «s I 1 1 24,936 27,4481 27.4481
OA/OC 24,98 25,712 25,712
Program Management 20,549 20,549 20,54
Data Management 20 680 20,680 20 680
Total 136 6Fi 391,225 394,25 558,70 545,61 441,94 239,1 243 289 243,2
B. BENTHIC MONITORING
Quarterly Saypting 26,80 51 107 57,03 60 501 63,10 63,10 81,5 57,95 57,95 (23,569)
Quarterly Benthic Infaum Identification 78,401 115,72 122,83 130 485 136,1 136,1 137,14 136,8 136 829 (319)
Quarterly Chemical & Ph sical Analysis 164,4 247,441 265,513 359,354 379,65 375,5 380,244 283 249 283,24 (96 995)
Semiam t Bioaccu lotion 41,951 25,70 38,3 43,2 59,72 0 0 4,029, 4,029 4,029
Annual SaffpHrig 9,7911 9.3401 10,224 16,9411 10,0621 10,662 12,3151 11,70 11 763 (552)
Annual eenthic infauna Identification 12.4 17,32 18.242;199764
09 20,809 20,809 19,245 19,24 (1 564)
Anr t Chemical and Physical Analysis 48.3 64,15 70,09423 105,22 105,223 79,770 79,770 (25,453)
Monthl QualityData R its 17,353 17,74G 17,74
OA/QC 114 957 115,275 115,2
Program Management 20,91 20,91 20,918
Data Management 15.497 15.497 15.497
Total 402,29 530,79 582,34267 710,964 737267 761 567 762 278 25 011
C. TRAWLSSemiamual Trawl Surve 16,653 21,672 23,58294 29,698 31 011 23 439 23 439 (7 5723
AMMI Histo atholog Studies 10 245 13,825 15.4363 26,333 26,6 28,21 26 679 471
Annual Priority Pollutant Sampling 52,4301 70,4251 76,558 100,4 125,6291 121,257 121.4811 98.048 98,048 (23,433)
Data Reports 5,359 5,558 5,55
OA/OC 23,670 23,670 23,670
Program Management 5,184 5,1 5,1
Data Management 6,068 6,0 6,0
Total 79,32 105 922 115,5 143,74 181,65 177,2 179,10 189,98 188,646 9,54
EXHIBIT 2 (cont.)
_ itterease
(Decrease)
TAS%/sue TAS%s Year 1 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 (1) Year 5 (2)Year 5 (3) Year 6 (1) Year 6 (2)Year 5-6
D. RIG FISHING
Fish Cunsuaption Survey ___ 1 071 1.1 1,245 _ 1,344 1,579 1 579 7 579 1,14
7 1,14 - ( 432)
Semiannual Fish Survey 6,843 12.5 13 079 _ 13,7991 13,711 13 734 if 632 12 958 72 780 (1,852)
Semlamual Priority Pollutant Smy�l inq 9 586 14 1f2 15 O50 19,059 29 948 29 533 29 533 18 Gi5 18 L45 (11 O88)
Amual xistapa tool ogy gtudits _ 3 415 3 TN L 897 5 774 8 451 8 490 8,492 9.61 8,74 311
Data Report 2.371 2,371 2,371
OA/W 4116 5I30 5130
Program Management 3,493 2,978 2,9781
Data Management 2,196 2,392 2.392
Total 20,9151 31.6141 34,271 39,9 53 709 53,336 54 236 54.3 53 98S- ( 253)
E. DATA SLRa1RRY AND INTERPRETATION
Quarterly ODES Report 4 498 62.42 77 169 80 003 87.1163 87.84 0 33,20 33,20 33,2
October 30 Ammol Report 13,22 12.5 13.32 4.2 7,02 6,63 0 9,851 9,055 9,05
January 30 Annual Report 47 089 74 968 80,00 133.12 174.98 198 312 198,31 149.02 149,02 (49,289)
Data Storage, Management 97,819 11 1" O86 106.15 113 779 131.73 156.45 78.55 86,130 (67,653)
A6ditional Annual Report Requiremicants 0 0 0 19 200 84,35 55,80 55,80 0 0 (55,802)
MO/Management Report _ 10.0114 10 084 10.054
Program Management I I 1 32.5391 32,538 32.5381
Total 162.6341 247.075, 274 578 342.68 465.00 480,332 410.56 313.25 322 708 (87,859)
F.ADDITIONAL SERVICES
Liaison with of st ri c[/Mpnegemen[ 21 106 28,74 37,1 39 690 56,485 56.4 56,48 39 672 39 672 (ib 815)
Quarterly acvicw Meeting With Districts 7 111 10 2G1 11,15 12.15 20 066 IB 600 18 600 16.90 ib 902 (1 698)
Camera Ready Copy of Reports. 1 862 410 398 0 0 0 0
QC Document Review 0 0 0 3,65 5 963 4,81 4,81 (4,817)
Permit Mai oh Assistance 0 0 0 5,154 7,0 0 0
np Contract Coleti on Activities 0 0 0 0 10 005 10 OOS 10 ODS (10 005)
Program Memagpment 6 118 6,115 6.1181
Total 30 079 39,394 48 723 60 660 99 591 89 909 89,9 62 692 62,69 (27,217)
Eguipoont ContiMemies _ 0 10.300 10,300 10,225 10,225 10.2 6.1 (6,132)
Weather Contingerc les _ 0 10,300 10 300 10 225 10,225 10,225 6,13 (6,132
Options R Additi onol Studies 82,953 35,3D9' 110 676 55 949 0 0 0 44,769 44 769
Profin 37,824 128,549 126 276 11,9111 187,831 171 295 126,22 138 180 143,00 16 773
Total with AmeMrents A Op[Ionsl 1,002,705, 1,530,486 1,707,294 1,%2 265 21321.623 21145,523 1,6091570 1 759 210 1,821 36365 211,79
MM\au\excel\920096.%LS '
WATER QUALITY W/O CURRENTS CURREN
300 350
uo 300
1 200 1 M`
x 0 150 0 200
0 iW a 0 130
50
0 IN Up50
0
1 _2 3 C 5(I) 5(3) 6(2) 0
1 2 3 4 5(1) 5(3) 8(2)
BENTHIC TRAWL
900 200
r50 1!5
rE.
50
1 600 i
u
x Q 450 X U 100
0 300 0 15
50 2s
0 :. 0a
1 2 3 0 5(1) 5(0) 6(2) 1 2 3 3 5(1) 5(3) 6(2)
RIGFISH DATA INTERPRETATION
6o su
so-
aso
40 375
77
a 0 30 a 0 300
0 0 2zs
0 20 0 150
0 75
0 0
1 2 3 a 5(1) 5(3) 6(2) 1 2 3 a 5(1) 5(3) 6(2)
j l Districts estimated costs to asses
SAIL Charges responsibility and to assist
Exhibit 3 HISTORY OF OCEAN MONITORING CHARGES
(Page 1 of 21
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
100
90.
s0
1 )0
0 60
a 0 50
40
0 30
20
10
0
1 2 3 4 5(1) 5(3) 6(2)
PROFIT
zoo
ns
s0
1 125
x 0 100
0
0 vs
w
u
0
1 2 3 4 5(1) 5(3) 6(2)
TOTAL COST
2400
21M
1800
500
x 00 1200
0 300
300
0
1 2 3 4 5(1) 5(3) 6(2)
Districts estimated Costs to assume
11 SAIC Charges it responsibility and to assist
Exhibit 3 HISTORY OF OCEAN MONITORING CHARGES
pony 2 .1 -1
EXHIBIT 4
Districts- Estimated Sampling Costs
Person Days Hrs/Day Hrs/Mo. Hrs/Yr. Dollars/Hr. Total/Yr.
4 14 56 672 34* $22,848
* $20/hr X 71%
RE : AGENDA ITEM #14
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
.1 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
1OSA4 Ews AVENUE
io.BOA 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY.GUECANIA 92728.8127
May 31, 1990 71.1952znt
�../
n+n saxzsto
REPORT OF
CONSERVATION. RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: May 31, 1990 - 5:30 a.m.
COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT:
Present:
Hank Wedaa, Chairman J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
John C. Cox Blake P. Anderson, Director of Tech. Serv.
Richard B. Edgar Thomas Dawes, Director of Engineering
William D. Mahoney Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance
Carrey J. Nelson Charles Nichols, Conservation,
Peer A. Swan Reclamation and Reuse Manager
Edna Wilson Robert Ooten, ASS'C. Superintendent, Operations
Grace Winchell Ed Hodges, Senior Facl. Mgr. , Maintenance
Absent: others Present:
Iry Pickier Tom Woodruff, General Counsel
Clarke Ide, Ass't. General Counsel
1) Opening Discussion
Chairman Wedaa opened the meeting and asked the Committee members to introduce
themselves and comment on their interest in the Committee's activities. Topics of
special interest to the Directors included:
• Opportunity for avoiding future capital investments in treatment
facilities through water conservation savings.
• Water reclamation opportunities, marketing, innovative technologies and
local implementation.
• Inter-jurisdictional cooperation on water and sludge management issues.
• Treated sewage effluent as a resource or commodity.
• Legislative liaison needed to enhance reclamation and reuse.
• The benefits, and the need, to make water conservation happen.
• Relationship of conservation, reclamation and reuse to energy
management.
• Range of water reclamation practices.
v
Report of the Conservation, May 31, 1990
Reclamation and Reuse Committee
Page 2 of 3
Chairman Wedaa noted that he had met with staff to develop the discussion agenda for
this meeting (copy attached) . He indicated that the items would be discussed in
whatever manner was deemed desirable by the Committee members and that items not
covered at this meeting would be continued to future meetings. Copies of the
supporting agenda material are also enclosed.
2) Staffing Update
In December, 1989, upon recommendation of this Committee, the Board approved
additional staff for the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Division to help carry
out the ambitious goals of the Districts' 30-year Action Plan adopted by the
Directors last July.
Charles Nichols, the division manager, reported on the status of staffing in his new
division. In the division, there are a total of four positions authorized including
manager, secretary and two principal environmental specialists. Three of the four
positions are filled with one principal environmental specialist position still
open. Advertising and interviewing continues for filling this position.
3) Water Conservation Activities
A staff report on water conservation was begun by staff. After reporting on the
drought status and overall reclamation activities of Orange County versus the rest
of California, the focus of the Committee shifted to water reclamation. Further
discussion of water conservation was continued to the next Committee meeting.
4) Water Reclamation Activities
A. General Discussion of Water Reclamation Implementation Plan
Staff reviewed information on the proposed Southern California wastewater
reclamation "Backbone" system. This is a developing federal program to create
a regional network of conveyance pipelines for reclaimed water. The Directors
expressed support for such a system.
Discussion of the regional system led into a review of the local water
reclamation network known as the Green Acres Project, currently under
construction by the Orange County Water District. At a future meeting, staff
will arrange for a briefing on Orange County's water system infrastructure.
Staff updated the Directors on the most feasible sites in the Anaheim Forebay
for construction of a new water reclamation plant and the status of site
acquisition for potential water reclamation plants. The Directors emphasized
the approach of developing a state-of-the-art demonstration facility, one
which could serve as a model throughout the county and the state.
S
Report of the Conservation, May 31, 1990
Reclamation and Reuse Committee
Page 3 of 3
The Committee reviewed staff's suggested Reclamation Implementation Plan.
During the discussion, the Directors asked staff to revise the draft to
include alternative plans. One plan would move forward on a broad multi-
faceted front of local and regional water reclamation activities, while the
alternate would approach the reclamation activities in a phased, sequential
manner. Staff will, by the next Committee meeting, draft alternate
implementation plans and outline the resource implications of each.
B. Authorization to Negotiate for Acquisition of Water Reclamation Sites
The staff discussed the potential sites in the Anaheim Forebay for
construction of a water reclamation plant. The discussion focused on the
primary site owned by Waste Water Disposal Company located in the City of
Fullerton in the vicinity of State College Boulevard and Orangethorpe Avenue.
The staff then reviewed an appraisal that had been performed on the 5-6 acre
parcel and sought authorization to negotiate for the parcel and for adjacent
properties for potential future expansions if the market opportunities develop
for reclaimed water.
Recommendation:
The Committee recommends that the staff and counsel be authorized to negotiate
with property owners for acquisition of a site or sites for water reclamation
plants in the general vicinity of the Anaheim Forebay based upon appraisals
for such properties.
5) Sludge Management Activities
Review of sludge management activities was continued to a future meeting.
6) Future Committee Meetings
The Committee members determined that meetings would be held as needed on the fourth
Thursday of the month.
CGN:hc
Ref. #030064.RP
`� Attachment
May 25, 1990
DISCUSSION OUTLINE
CONSERVATION. RECLAMATION & REUSE COMMITTEE
MAY 31, 1990
I. Opening Discussion
A. Self-Introductions & Background/Interest in
Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Issues
B. Committee Purpose
Attachments
II. Staffing Update for New Conservation, Goldenrod
Reclamation and Reuse Division
III. Current Water Conservation Activities Salmon
A. Status Update
1. The Drought
2. County-wide Conservation Status
3. MWD Conservation Credits Program
4. ^Miniflush" Performance Report
5. In-Plant Water Use and Conservation
B. Draft Conservation Plan
1. EPA/State Grant Program
2. Education Program
3 . Industrial, Commercial and Institutional
Initiatives
4 . Initiatives in Residential Water Conservation
C. Conservation Implementation Plan
D. Phase II Consulting Services
1. Scope, Schedule & Budget
IV. Current Water Reclamation Activities Blue
A. Status Update
1. AS 1312- Water Reclamation Bond Issue
2. Southern California Waste Water Reclamation
"Backbone" System
B. Waste Water Disposal Company Site Acquisition Status
C. Reclamation Implementation Plan
V. Current Sludge Management Activities Green
A. Status Update
1. Sludge Production and Distribution
a. RECYC Composting
b. Curti Composting
C. PIMA GRO Agricultural Land Application
d. BKK Landfilling
2. Coyote Canyon Landfill Closure and Sludge Soil
Amendment
3. New Cooperative Ventures
a. Central Valley Agricultural Land Application
b. Co-Composting With Orange County
�s✓ C. Co-Composting With Village Nurseries
4. Regulatory Liaison
_ a. AS 939/AB 1820- Integrated Solid Waste
Management Act �a✓
b. AS 2295- Sludge as Agricultural Fertilizer
C. BLM Sludge Land Ban Policy
d. EPA Sludge Regs
B. Sludge Management Implementation Plan
VI. Appendices
A. MWD Conservation Credits Program White
B. Draft Water Conservation Plan Canary
C. Waste Water Disposal Company site Grey
Appraisal Letter
CGN:hc
Ref. #030074.RP
STAFFING UPDATE FOR NEW CONSERVATION.
_ RECLAMATION AND REUSE DIVISION
In mid-December of 1989, the Districts' Board of Directors
approved a staffing plan for the Conservation, Reclamation and
Reuse (CRR) Division which authorized the addition of two
professional staff members to focus on water reclamation and
conservation issues. Immediately after that authorization,
working with the Personnel Division, we posted the notice for the
two positions and advertised in local newspapers.
At the same time, realizing that our needs would be narrowly
focused, advertisements were placed in the American Water Works
Association Journal and the California Department of Water
Resources - Water Conservation News. As it turns out, our best
response from interested persons has been from these two
specialty advertisements. As a result of this recruitment
process, we screened the candidate pool and interviewed a total
of 11 prospective employees.
At this time, we have been able to fill one of the two positions.
Michelle Merritt has begun work focusing on the Districts' water
conservation programs.
Among the other 10 candidates interviewed, two were qualified for
the position and we attempted to hire them. Unfortunately, we
were unsuccessful, as each person had been offered other, higher
paying jobs of a similar nature which they accepted. At this
time, we are continuing to advertise and accept applications for
the remaining position.
1
CURRENT CONSERVATION ACTIVITIES
A. STATUS UPDATE
1. THE DROUGHT. For the fourth year in a row (1986-1990) ,
California has experienced below normal rainfall, precipitating
what has been called the worst dry spell on record. The only
longer dry spell ocurring this century was from 1929 to 1934 .
Even if we had been experiencing normal rainfall and runoff
patterns for the past four years, the addition of nine million
people in California since 1970 still would seriously tax an
already burdened water delivery system.
To understand the significance of this drought, we have charted
the state Department of Water Resources' (DWR) annual
precipitation rating. The DWR rates each year based on runoff
into the Sacramento River Basin which supplies most of the water .
for the State Water Project. Exhibit 1 shows these ratings for
the past 30 years. As shown in the exhibit, six of the past ten
years including 1990, have been dry or critically dry.
Even though each Californian is using less water today per capita
than in 1970, officials of the Metropolitan Water District say
that Southern Californians still face the prospects of a
continuing water shortage because of our booming population, even
during years of normal to above average precipitation. Current
projections are that if Southern California continues to grow at
its present rate, the currently available water supply may fall
short of demand for six of the next ten years, even if rain and
snowfall are normal.
Despite these projections, water officials expect to ship
Southern California the same amount that it received last year.
However, losses from other sources signal that. the situation is
getting more serious each year. A perhaps, not so coincidental
dry spell in the Upper Colorado Basin, the source of water from
the Colorado River, has cut the Colorado's flow to 45% of normal,
the lowest it has been since 1906. Also, this year Arizona has
exercised its legal right to Colorado River water that last year
made its way through the California Aqueduct to Southern
California.
Southern California, particularly the City of Los Angeles, is
also losing some of its supply from the Owens Valley and Mono
Lake diversions. Los Angeles used to get nearly 75% of its
supply from these eastern Sierra sources. Recent court decisions
have stated that Los Angeles' thirst has damaged the ecology of
2
I - Critically Dry
2 - Dry
EXHIBIT 1 3 - Below Normal
4 - Above Normal
DWR ANNUAL PRECIPITATION RATING 5 - Wet
5
4
3
2
1
0 f
1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990
( ) 3 )
Mono Lake and destroyed fisheries in the area. The drought in
the eastern Sierras has also reduced Owens Valley runoff, further
lessening the main Los Angeles water supply. Consequently, Los
Angeles plans to buy about 60% of its water this year from the
Metropolitan Water District, leaving MWD about 12% short for its
other customers.
Many cities, particularly San Bernardino, Riverside, several in
the San Gabriel Valley and north and central Orange County, pump
a majority of their water from underground aquifers and rely on
the state water projects only to supplement their supply.
However, many wells in these areas have been closed because of
chemical contamination and lack of rainfall has lowered the water
table. A wet year with heavy rains and better than average
snowfall in the local and northern mountains could alleviate some
problems, but another year of drought would pose serious problems
even for these areas.
The current situation has caused MWD and its member water
agencies to encourage a 10% cut in water use, first through a
voluntary program of water conservation. If the voluntary
program is successful, the current 12% shortfall could be made up
through voluntary savings. Other cities have taken a more
aggressive position. The city of Los Angeles has imposed a
mandatory water rationing plan complete with a "drought buster"
enforcement program and surcharges for excess use.
Santa Barbara, which relies almost exclusively on local rainfall
for its water supply, is facing an even more critical problem and
has imposed severe penalties for violating their 45% mandatory
rationing program which forbids lawn watering, landscape
irrigation with anything but drip irrigation or greywater, car
washing, and imposes severe penalties for offenders.
2. COUNTY-WIDE CONSERVATION STATUS. These circumstances have
led to a variety of actions in Orange County. Several cities and
water agencies serving Orange county have implemented or proposed
ordinances calling for voluntary water conservation. The
following matrix, Exhibit 2, lists the types of programs that
have been implemented and some of the major elements of those
programs.
In addition to the measures reported in Exhibit 2, the Orange
County Water Conservation Task Force was formed earlier this year
and contains representatives from business, industry and
government. Focusing mainly on landscaping and irrigation
conservation, the Task Force has prepared a draft ordinance for
the Board of Supervisors that requires developers to submit a
water management plan before getting permits to build new
development projects in the county. The Draft report calls for
4
eXHIUIl P
LIST OF COUNTY-WIDE WATER CONSERVATION GROGRAM
v.1LE 5tl kP a Se Q !
�—Ol
S Y g
oql
-FILEY 'SQ 8Q �W :� iAx 5d
:b
I'll of FREE".
OIII OF pIF
[III 01 A.E....
TOSIA ll.
CONSOL nLC
.OS
CITE OF IYN IF4 VALLEY luw "R
CIII OF IULLIrtP FF.OragM OrClmm In IN wm
.11 OI w.ol.aert
,.IT of .wn.mP IEFTE -.e.[. 1. n.e el.. m IT.w.0
Clll OI YVIxF
TIFF OI LETTER FIFCx L.E— loa.W[rt 01[]r ltt
RE
1111 OF Ll.1.JRFA
CIII OF a Plo
1111 OI FOR FLMIIM E.. I.F. Wtp I..
Cp..pmun ISi
CIT 0 .1-1 IdCx g00 pa lun Pr n.
FEE. e
Clll OI ggpL
LIFT OF IYCLx1IF
CIII OI LW4 FP
CIT 01 R4 IL¢x 1.ONl—
C111 OI 11S11.
1111 OF VILLF x IT Svnm Irg pllm
O1.[rlu
SIFT OI YLST.gil[.
[I if OF IP.F LINER
7—TER AGENTHS
F.
OF
SN COUNTY x CO.S10-FILE OISTSIpi ct
IYW
5
guidelines governing the kind of vegetation that could be
planted, the irrigation equipment to be used and the landscape
maintenance plan to be implemented. Other sections of the report
address long term solutions, including forming a permanent
advisory group on water issues. Other Task Force suggestions
include a new residential billing system based on the number of
people in the household and the amount of landscape area on the
property. Users who exceeded their allocation would be assessed
fees, the proceeds of which would be funneled back into a
conservation advertising campaign. The final first phase report
will be available in June 1990.
From the media coverage on water conservation and several of the
new or updated conservation programs, we have summarized the
recommended water conservation practices. Exhibit 3 lists such
recommendations for inside and outside the home.
Lastly, in April of this year, the Orange County Board of
Supervisors adopted a resolution asking citizens, governments and
businesses to voluntarily cut water consumption by 10%. The
resolution provided a list of 10 conservation steps which could
be easily taken by Orange Countians.
3 . MWD WATER CONSERVATION CREDITS PROGRAM. As a part of
inventorying the water status in the region, one invariably makes
it to the doorstep of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern
California (MWD) . In so doing, staff has learned of the Water
Conservation Credits Program. Appendix A supplies a brief
introduction to the conservation credits program.
The essence of MWD's water conservation credits program is to
provide financial incentives for water conservation projects
through member agencies. The program is similar to MWD's Local
Projects Program which focuses on reclaiming water. MWD will pay
for project water savings, based on their avoided cost of
aqueduct pumping, up to one-half of the cost of each qualifying
water conservation project. This value is based on the avoided
energy cost of pumping state project water through the East
Branch.
Sanitation Districts' staff is working directly with the MWD
manager of the water conservation credits program and local
member agencies.
4 . "MINIFLUSH" PERFORMANCE REPORT. At the CRSR's last meeting,
staff made available to the Directors a toilet retrofit water
conservation device, known as the "Miniflush Water Saver. --
Constructed of heavy plastic, the Miniflush may be installed in
many toilet tanks and can save between 2.3 and 5 gallons of water
per flush, depending on the water capacity of the toilet tank.
Forty eight units were provided to the Directors and staff who
have been testing them over the past several months.
�.r 6
EXHIBIT 3 �..
..r
List of Voluntary Water Conservation Program Recommendations
Inside The Home Outside The Home
Install low-flow plumbing Restaurants serve water
only fixtures on request
Fix leaky pipes & faucets Turn off decorative
fountains unless a water
Take shorter showers - turn recycling system is used
off water while soaping down
Install pool and spa covers
Wash only full loads in washing
machine & dishwasher Avoid watering lawns &
gardens during peak hours
Don't let water run while (usually 10 a.m - 4 p.m. )
shaving or brushing teeth and on windy days to
minimize evaporation
Add displacement devices to
toilet tanks Don't hose down driveways,
sidewalks or patios except
Don't use your toilet as a for health or sanitary
"flushable wastebasket" purposes
Keep drinking water in the Plant drought resistant
refrigerator landscaping
Prevent gutter flooding
Adjust automatic sprinklers
to avoid flooding
Deep soak lawn rather than
light sprinkling
Install efficient
irrigation systems, if
possible
Don't let water run while
washing car
Use mulch around trees
and plants
7
Recently, we checked with the individuals who received the
Miniflush units to determine their opinions on the performance of
the devices. A summary of responses is shown in Exhibit 4. It is
interesting to note that 32% of the participants did not install
the device due to the confusing instructions, product appearance
and improper fit. Also, the participant's subjective opinion on
the performance of the units was slightly weighted towards the
negative rather than the positive. It should be noted that 24% of
the original recipients were not reached during the survey.
5. IN-PLANT WATER USE AND CONSERVATION. The Sanitation Districts
uses water for a variety of activities and needs. The use of water
can be categorized into three types including city or potable
water, industrial or reclaimed water and plant water (chlorinated
secondary clarifier effluent) . Also, the Sanitation Districts
supplies considerable volumes of plant water to the Orange County
Water District (OCWD) for further processing and ultimately
subsurface injection as a seawater intrusion barrier.
From research of the Districts' records, we have summarized city
water use for the 1980's. Exhibit 5 charts the growth of city
water use during the 1980 's as new treatment facilities and
personnel have been added. At Plant 1, city water use from
Fountain Valley has grown from .014 mgd (15.7 AF/yr, ) in 1984 to
. 128 mgd (143. 6 AF/yr. ) projected for fiscal year 189/190. This
growth in water use amounts to a 914% increase and results from
several water intensive facility additions including sludge
dewatering, physical/chemical wastewater treatment and air
scrubbers.
At Plant 2, city water use from Huntington Beach grew from . 03 mgd
(33.7 AF/yr. ) in 1981 to .28 mgd (314.2 AF/yr. ) projected for
fiscal 1989/90. This amounted to a 933% increase and results from
similar plant additions as at Plant 1.
Although these are large percentage increases in city water, it is
anticipated that as much as 70% of these water volumes can and will
be converted to reclaimed water from the OCWD. This reclaimed or
industrial water substitution will return the Sanitation Districts
to pre-1987 levels at Plant 1 and pre-1983 levels at Plant 2 .
Connection to the OCWD reclaimed water supply at Plant 1 is
anticipated in late 1991. The connection will be possible when the
OCWD Green Acres project is complete and the Sanitation Districts'
have completed upgrading the city water system in Plant 1. The
Plant 1 system is being upgraded as part of the P1-34 project to
provide a separate pumping and pipeline network for the city water
and the reclaimed water. The uses expected for the reclaimed water
include polymer mixing in sludge dewatering, physical/chemical
treatment, air scrubbers and for washdown.
8
EXHIBIT 4
SUMMARY OF MINIFLUSH SYSTEM PERFORMANCE
Total Number of Units Distributed 48
Total Number of Units Confirmed Installed 19
Total Number of Recipients 25
Recipients Installing Units 11
Recipients Not Installing Units 8
Recipients Not Reached During Survey 6
Recipients' Opinion on Performance
Excellent 1
Good 2
Fair 9
Poor 3
Lousy 3
No Opinion 7
9 �
EXHIBIT 5
CITY WATER CONSUMPTION
❑ Plant No. 1 f Plant No. 2
.30
.25
.20
Mgd .15
.10
.05
.00
80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
Fiscal Year
10
Connection to the OCWD reclaimed water supply at Plant 2 is
anticipated sometime in 1994. To accomplish this tie in, the OCWD
Green Acres Phase 2 project will be extended along the Santa Ana ...r
River into Huntington Beach. The 1994 target has been set by the
OCWD.
In addition to the change over to reclaimed water for many of the
treatment plant systems, staff will be taking steps in the next few
months to further conserve water in-plant. These steps will
include the following:
1. A complete updated inventory of water uses and fixtures
at the Districts;
2 . Immediate repair of any leaking pipes, faucets or
fixtures;
3. Immediate adjustments of any excessive or misdirected
irrigation systems;
4. Operations analysis of further conservation opportunities .
such as charging the secondary clarifier process,
recirculating water through the odor scrubbers in lieu of
a single pass;
5. As appropriate, retrofit Districts' water fixtures with
low flow devices;
6. Complete a Districts' employee education program on water
conservation practices;
7. Institute changes to landscaping as appropriate to
prevent unwise water use;
8. Complete and implement a Xeriscape plan for Districts'
landscaping;
9. Revise Districts' standard construction specifications to
reflect the latest water conserving technology and plant
associations design consistent with recent landscaping
ordinances and practices;
10. Seek and obtain MWD conservation credits.
The measures listed above will be the primary responsibility of the
CR&R Division's new principal environmental specialist.
B. DRAFT CONSERVATION PLAN
1. EPA/STATE GRANT. During the early 1980% the Sanitation
Districts accepted an EPA monetary grant, #1073-150, administered
through the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Clean Water
Grant Program. As a condition of these grants, the Governor
ordered the SWRCB to implement water conservation programs.
The grant regulations required the Sanitation Districts to complete
a flow reduction analysis and implement specific water conservation
measures. A portion of this work was performed in the recent
master plan update and a draft summary report focusing on water
conservation has been prepared. The draft report is attached as
Appendix B. This draft report has been forwarded to the SWRCB
Office of Loans and Grants. However, we have not yet received any
11 �„�
response from the agency.
2. EDUCATION PROGRAM. At the Sanitation Districts, water
conservation awareness is blended into all tours of the treatment
plant. This education process includes a 13-minute film on water
use and conservation in and around the home.
Also, the Sanitation Districts is currently co-sponsoring a
kindergarten through sixth grade science curriculum on
environmental quality awareness. The program includes water
conservation themes and the importance of wise water use. The
program also stresses the concept of personal responsibility toward
our environment.
3. INDUSTRIAL. COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL INITIATIVES. The
Introduction and Summary of the Sanitation Districts' 1989 revised
'Wastewater Discharge Regulations" states that two of the primary
goals of the Ordinance are:
• To require the reduction of water discharged to the sewer
system.
• To require waste minimization and material substitution for
industrial users.
The Sanitation Districts have, since the late 1970 % encouraged
water conservation as a means to reduce the size of its pollution
control facilities and reduce the cost of operation both in water
purchased and wastewater discharged. The Sanitation Districts'
industrial waste inspectors are field oriented and have provided
technical assistance to a variety of dischargers on manufacturing
process changes that may reduce the wastewater discharge without
suffering a loss in product quality. Suggestions on better rinsing
techniques and reuse or recycle of water to a less critical use are
in the technical repertoire of the inspectors and the Sanitation
Districts' engineers. The inspectors also enforce the prohibition
against single pass cooling water requiring recycle to a cooling
tower or air cooler, a chilled water system, or reuse of the water
in another piece of equipment in the manufacturing process.
The Sanitation Districts ' waste discharge permit system prevents
dilution and wasting water from being used to meet discharge
limits. The permit limit is based on mass emission rates, the
average wastewater flow and concentration of the pollutant. When a
discharger is sampled on a particular day to determine if they are
in compliance with the permit limits, they cannot just turn up the
rinse water to dilute the concentrations.
Future plans to encourage and require water conservation among the
Sanitation Districts' industrial, commercial and institution
dischargers will be done as part of the Sanitation Districts' waste
minimization program. A multi-agency task force of the Orange
County Health Care Agency Waste Management Section, the South Coast
r 12
Air Quality Management Agency, and the Sanitation Districts has
assembled to provide a multi-media land, air and water approach to
waste minimization. The Sanitation Districts implemented in ....
January 1990, permit requirements for a waste minimization plan and
enforcement requirements for waste minimization audits for chronic
non-compliant dischargers.
The planned emphasis of the Sanitation Districts will first focus
on industrial water conservation techniques to reduce the
wastewater flow. Industries will either implement waste
minimization and water conservation techniques or be required to
submit a report explaining why they cannot achieve these goals.
Eventually, as more firms show that water conservation is
practical, the Sanitation Districts hope to base future waste
discharge permit limits on the expected flow with water
conservation rather than permit limits based on present discharges.
After completion of these steps with the 450 first priority
industries, the Sanitation Districts will turn its focus toward
commercial and institutional discharges. These are a much larger
number of discharging entities typified as having significantly
lower wastewater flows per employee or per square foot of floor
space.
4. INITIATIVES IN RESIDENTIAL WATER CONSERVATION. The Sanitation
Districts' newly adopted water conservation policy states:
• Actively foster and promote water conservation;
• Develop cooperative programs with other public agencies to
provide public education, community use of water-saving
devices, amend plumbing codes, and other appropriate changes
to help reduce water usage.
To achieve the Sanitation Districts' water conservation goals,
eight major steps need to be taken. These steps include accurate
definition of the Sanitation Districts' facilities, evaluation of
conservation alternatives, evaluation of political and
institutional factors affecting conservation implementation, survey
of existing conservation programs as examples, research and
demonstration of conservation devices and development of
information and education programs. This will produce a
comprehensive and detailed conservation plan and policy for
consideration and implementation by the Boards.
After implementation, routine monitoring will provide the
Sanitation Districts with an understanding of the results being
achieved. This monitoring will provide an ongoing assessment of
flow increases to be used in determining timing of construction for
trunk and treatment plant expansions.
13
r.r
C. WATER CONSERVATION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
�r
To achieve the objectives set forth above, the Sanitation Districts
need to carefully develop an implementation plan; one that is
balanced, applying the optimum amount of resources (staff,
consultants and contractors) at the most efficient pace to
accomplish the authorized tasks. Staff has evaluated the needs for
plan implementation and developed an approach for the Director's
consideration summarized in Exhibit 6.
Over the next year, staff and a consultant would determine specific
in-plant water conservation measures including a Districts'
xeriscape plan. Also, the team would evaluate water conservation
projects to be developed or implemented jointly with other area
agencies or to be handled exclusively by the Districts. The
culmination of this task would be a Conservation Projects Plan.
D. CONSULTANT SCOPE
To complete the work identified in Exhibit 6 at the pace suggested,
the Districts would need to obtain the services of a consultant
specializing in water conservation practices. A consultant would
be needed to handle some of the specialized work in which
Districts' personnel are not trained or experienced. In Exhibit 7,
we have listed tasks which are recommended for consultant action.
A preliminary estimate of fees for these services was placed at
$145, 000. These expenditures over a year would average about 3/4
of an individual 's time per month.
14
IAor P1 e�iwn i,wTG�1,ea�fsi ttiV7ties- IB lf3r_leucltlar_ldlnl�aitlevH75eo l4QTIQes Len e A
ERR
E._Ilpt7p�5�n7F(!-C�mpa'rRLAY_. .v __c
ongyJ de )e e F . A3 1f1
4r-s ( HaSQ 9Pser Prl3ernat lve. E�
fYEY o.0 Pa Ef [PJIaR. NlH4
SP.arn aaaa♦
HCL
t_
� 3 —
[ Ionast_
_Hd4sEc���adnPJfe3el
s Inventyrae¢sLYrlraaMat �
�aoaseRarl
Ll4 dr sedr[n 97�tnl2rw[ion on
sssseeeerrrr a�
IDd nervation _
IhY1HEs
-. {Erlllllt ➢.. Iernat 3
SPp rgfY➢I1VH_I ILernetlm
wn11P-1LIHrPd1.lPf13HH..
an Jotnl VELIHCESW3aFv
2 34—alm ndlL-Sn4l�tc1il
_lnelllt
vatagn
A Port
pQNS,nedPlVAi�017
n4P4ory plstr s vat
7�9 4ldiEt�Q.aa lf2
&@@dS iHPa.Sa l Y a i P.Servation
4aP➢Ltyy99�J219 IIL. refit Pont__ —
I[41lL.HIgIr1P[a�1!t!Pes �
IPYEE19LSdLH^ QInH_tleltr _
[[yt pan _
CC 1IggE3fi gervat 1P g�I' 1p9 t flpW[ I'S plae
NOts
ak yP3nes teltlslr-1[F LIanOSaHIP$
�a3lain_LIxV.SHHM vv"I! rrEaltS _.._
-- N 7.11aNA% CIMINFPCLLI.INPNti19L6
_ . Jss)pin9lasrg Sa p5 agtLrPinsH__ ..
__.after too 1.6P_PPIEt€1 _ _
1A`e_IINNIIAL t�IB0flI$ -
4cY1NIVaf in91
totF t ! mterPlnea
a ! r (ash I eeq letcl
ANIIlR 8
SI�GGE5IEG Wa1FP CGNSWVai IOH
I FIVI Y'MEII I:.I lull 1+1 ifl
EXHIBIT 7
LIST OF CONSERVATION CONSULTANT TASKS
1. Identify and evaluate conservation alternatives
2 . Survey and Inventory water conservation programs
3 . List of Orange County/Southern California water purveyors
4. Map jurisdictions
5. Meet with water purveyors
6. Create strategy for CSDOC participation in water management
planning
7. Create inventory of urban water management plans
8. Library research of information on water issues
9. Survey and inventory of water conservation policies
10. Research and demonstration of conservation devices
11. Determine cost-effectiveness of conservation alternatives
12. Develop joint venture conservation projects with regional
utilities
13. Develop conservation financing plan
14 . CEQA Process
15. Operations analysis of conservation opportunities in treatment
16. Employee education regarding water conservation
17. Complete Districts' xeriscape plan
18. Revise landscaping bid documents
16
CURRENT RECLAMATION ACTIVITIES
A. STATUS UPDATE
1. AS 1312. During the fall of 1989, water reclamation agencies
formulated a proposal for a $200 million statewide water
reclamation plant bond issue. This proposal was supported by a
survey of water reclamation plant needs in California of over $2
billion. The Sanitation Districts and many of its member agencies
adopted resolutions of support for this measure which were then
forwarded to the legislative delegation in Sacramento.
At this time, AB 1312 languishes in Sacramento on hold until after
the June elections. Depending on the outcome of bond initiatives
in June, AB 1312 may be added to the fall ballot. In the water
industry, there exists considerable diversity of opinion on how
likely this measure is to reach the voters.
2. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WASTE WATER RECLAMATION BACKBONE SYSTEM.
As a matter of information, the staff has learned of a new proposal
initiated by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) to develop a
regional reclaimed waste water transportation network. The
legislative proposal would determine the feasibility of
constructing a regional "backbone" distribution system thereby
providing a pool of high quality reclaimed water for a variety of
uses. As presently envisioned, the backbone system could exist in
at least 6 counties, including Orange, Los Angeles, San Diego, San
Bernardino, Riverside and Imperial.
The proposal has been slated for introduction to the U.S. Senate as
a four year, $3 million effort. Funding would be split 50/50 with
local interests. At this time, staff is monitoring the progress of
this legislation utilizing our networks in CASA and AMSA. Exhibit
8 attached offers a schematic diagram of a possible backbone
system.
B. WASTE WATER DISPOSAL COMPANY SITE ACQUISITION
The Committee is aware that for the past couple of years, the
Districts' staff and staff of the Orange County Water District have
jointly investigated sites for the development of a reclamation
plant. The work was included in the 1989 Master Plan which
examined some 19 sites and targeted three sites as highest
priority. The reclamation plant would include primary and
secondary wastewater treatment plus dissolved mineral reduction
with a final end product essentially meeting drinking water
standards. Solids would be returned to the sewer for processing at
either the Fountain Valley or Huntington Beach treatment plants.
`/ 17
EXHIBIT B
SoUTIMN CALIFORNU WASTE WATI R
KERNj BACKBONE SYSTEM.,..........� ..^....... e......j
C SAN BERNARDINO
Pyramid Lake ° -i•___ _
j siverwood Low
1
'•rca.k.h, Bouquet
VENTURA\ Lake Ras, ; SAN BERNARDINO rSJ
:' LOS ANCELES i ;..... �.... ..Luke-pwtie...,n ................................... ..
ij.. ...i • flNEillldE - R i��r , e ^` _�..1,��•
LOS ANGELES ,N1 too------
RANGE hfliews f__ ..
i•••••. sultan _ RIVERSIDE
Sea
.... ......(............ ...,: :...........................................
SAN OIEGO
IMPERIAL
sm�
Vinc ade
Lawar � � -°
PROPOSED WASTE WATER Otay -,-
BACKBONE SYSTEM
SAN DIE00-------- California Aqueduct
"""'— Loe Angelee Aqueduct
'_"""'" Colorado River Aqueduct
-------- Coachella Canal d
All American Canal
"------ San Diego Aqueduct
l k3
The highest priority site is the Crescent Basin project.
.� Considerable amount of preliminary analysis has been conducted on
this site and the pros and cons of the site are well understood.
Subsequent to the adoption of the 1989 Master Plan, a nearby site
was identified by staff as an alternate. The site, owned by Waste
Water Disposal Company, is about 5-3/4 acres, located on State
College Boulevard just south of Orangethorpe Avenue.
The Waste Water Disposal site has some advantages over the Crescent
Basin site. The largest advantage is that it is not adjacent to a
residential community. It offers the same advantages for injecting
water in the groundwater basin and supplying water to the nearby
industrial community. The Crescent Basin site has an advantage by
being adjacent to the "Dad" Miller Golf Course which could receive
the reclaimed water.
Staff has secured an appraisal (attached) for the site. Based on
earlier discussions with this committee as well as the Directors at
large, staff is attempting to meet with the directors of the Waste
Water Disposal Company to review the appraisal as well as the terms
of a possible purchase. Several meetings have been scheduled and
canceled. As of this writing, a meeting is tentatively planned for
May 30.
During the committee meeting, staff will report in detail on the
progress of the acquisition of the site and the results of the
above-noted meeting.
C. RECLAMATION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
As presented above under conservation, staff has evaluated the
needs for reclamation implementation and developed an approach for
the Directors- consideration. The Districts- water reclamation
goals are more concrete and substantive than its conservation goals
and therefore, reflects more activity. Exhibit 9 shows an
abbreviated summary of a suggested approach with its schedule.
During the next year, staff will focus its attention on updating
our water agreement with the OCWD, assisting engineering with
siting of a new water reclamation plant in Fullerton and finalizing
a feasibility report on the Crescent Basin water reclamation plant.
During 1991, staff would investigate a regional water reclamation
network, followed by in 1992 evaluating a Lower Santa Ana River
wetlands restoration project. In March of 1993, staff would begin
a project evaluating new water reclamation treatment and
distribution technologies which would be completed in two years.
`/ 19
-. la wn�-:rtniwt;�nlMw..�x�ul��i;r4ow,i.wrw,i�'11wun w,l i„wri�rnw irw�w�w"Swn,n�w,w,i�'bn W ir.i.,imiN9wis,.iar w.x„uxr.L.iwL�n i�i�iwi>roinr w.iariJtr.n.i«��imw�wna_
su:w°4iYmlt 1pP —sm
uim nni vri(n.._— o
....NLI_LL4Pf•¢
.-�. NSlu llRanr�
llt ��L � � um���m� u....wm��m ar i...� v .w•.•Fomm..a.nmi _ �cJo
YT p
��p III O
J
I�ILhL[r� L�C�
i
EEIR,w
c..�raP
R,In in,°�l„W„I
.0W1„t 4111r1
='YZ
r'a I�h"6 �
HUHHEBTEO FSIIR� RECLPM<TIOM
CURRENT SLUDGE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
A. STATUS UPDATE
1. sludge Production and Distribution. For the last year and a
half, 52% of the Sanitation Districts' sludge has been recycled
while 48% has been added to refuse in landfills. In the recycling
category, we have maintained 36% of our sludge delivered to
composting and 16% of our sludge delivered for agricultural land
application. Recently, all of the Districts' sludge that is being
landfilled is being delivered to the BKK landfill in West Covina.
At this time, no sludges are being delivered to Coyote Canyon due
to it being closed to sludge.
2 . Coyote Canyon Landfill Closure. In March of this year, the
Orange County Integrated Waste Management Department, which
operates Orange County landfills, opened the new Bee Canyon
landfill and significantly reduced the flow of solid waste to
Coyote Canyon landfill. At that time, the IWMD began the closure
process for the landfill.
The Sanitation Districts' have proposed to the IWMD to use the
Districts' sludge as a portion of the final landfill cover. The
final cover will be approximately6-feet thick which includes a top
soil layer of 2.5-feet for growing plants. The Districts' sludge
would be an excellent material to blend with other soil planned for
this top layer. Sludge would add nutrients, would increase the
organic humus content of the soil and improve the water holding
capacity of the soil. Much research of this type of project has
occurred and .this research has shown that sludge blended with
locally available sandy soil will improve the survival and health
of plants installed by the IWMD.
The IWMD is expected to finalize its landfill closure plan this
summer and begin the closure process later this year. The closure
activities should last about 18 months.
3 . New Cooperative Ventures. As a part of pursuing sludge
management options for Board consideration, the CRR division staff
has been proceeding on three new cooperative ventures in sludge
reuse. Two are local, while one is in the central California
valley.
The central valley project would be an agricultural land
application project similar to the Districts' current projects in
the Palo Verde Valley area of eastern California and the Yuma area
in Arizona. Staff has visited several prospective farmers in the
central valley and have earned favorable receptions. We have been .
asked by these farmers to propose demonstration projects. Staff is
formulating project plans and proposals which would be forwarded to
20
the farmers.
The two local projects are co-composting proposals, one with the
IWMD of the county and one with Village Nurseries. Composting is
the biological decomposition of organic matter at an elevated
temperature. Co-composting is a term applied to the blend of
sludge and yard waste material such as tree prunings, leaves,
grasses, etc. When these materials are combined and composted one
has maximized the reuse opportunity. At the county each year, they
receive several hundred thousand tons of yard waste which could be
composted with the Districts' sludge. Staff is working with the
IWMD' s recycling manager to develop a project to bring these two
materials together.
on a much smaller scale, the local nursery generates several
thousand tons of yard waste annually which could also be blended
with sludge to make compost. Several advantage accrue from such a
project including 1) reduction of yard waste going to the landfill
which saves landfill space and dollars, 2) recycling of yard waste
and sludge on the nursery property which reduces the need for
imported soil products which also reduces use of petroleum products
which lessens energy use, improves air quality and saves dollars.
Staff is working with the nursery management to develop a project
to bring these two materials together.
4 . Regulatory Liaison. A significant portion of staff time
recently has focused on managing state legislation that affects the
Districts' sludge management. At the state level, a recent
legislative proposal, AB 1820, would amend last year's Integrated
Solid Waste Management Act (AB 939) . Before our involvement,
including testimony before a state Senate hearing of the Natural
Resources and Wildlife Committee, the measure would not have
allowed cities and counties to get recycling credit for any sludges
that were recycled. Clearly, this approach is not a recycling
incentive.
During April and May, staff in concert with CASA and other
agencies, successfully modified the bill to eliminate the sludge
recycling credits exclusion after 1991. In the intervening period,
state agencies with the assistance of CASA and Tri-TAC members,
including the Sanitation Districts, will review the safety of
sludge management and make any recommendations for changes that may
be appropriate.
At the federal level, the Bureau of Land Management in the
Department of the Interior has issued a policy statement dunning
municipal sewage sludge application to any lands under their
jurisdiction. Obviously, this policy is extremely negative and the
POTW community including the Sanitation Districts is actively
attempting to have BLM change this policy.
EPA continues to develop a final proposal for sludge management !�
regulations. The agency will issue results of a nationwide survey
21
of sludge quality later this year followed by issuance of the
regulations in October 1991.
B. SLUDGE MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
As presented above as part of conservation and reclamation, staff
has evaluated the needs for sludge management implementation and
developed an approach for the Directors' consideration. A
completed sludge management implementation plan will be distributed
at the committee meeting.
CGN:hc
Ref. #030077.RP
v 22
: v
APPENDIX A
MWD CONSERVATION CREDITS
PROGRAM
�✓ � '� ll9W0
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CARFORNIA
September 21, 1988
All Member Agencies
General Manager
Water Conservation Credits Program--Request for Proposals
On September 20. 1988 Metropolitan' s Board
approved the implementation of a "Water Conservation
Credits" program, which will provide financial incentives
for water conservation projects . In taking this action, the
Board authorized the General Manager to seek proposals from
our member agencies for participation in this program. You
are invited to submit proposals that meet the qualifications
defined in the attached Board letter dated August 8 , 1988
(Attachment 1) .
The program is similar to Metropolitans Local
Projects Program. Metropolitan will pay for project water
savings, based on our avoided cost of aqueduct pumping, up
to one-half of the cost of each qualifying water conservation
project. The value of aqueduct pumping will be based on the
avoided energy cost of pumping State project water through
the East Branch, subject to a minimum level of $75 per
acre-foot. This year , the minimum $75 value will be used .
Sample calculations to illustrate how the conservation
credits would be determined are shown in attachments to the
Board letter .
To qualify for the Conservation Credits program,
a water conservation project must:
1. Have demonstrable water savings;
2. Reduce demands on Metropolitan;
3 . Be technically sound:
4 . Have local support; and
All Member Agencies -2- September 21 , 1986
5 . Metropolitan ' s participation must be necessary to
make the project financially and economically
feasible.
Each proposal will be considered on a case-by-case
basis , leading to an agreement with the appropriate member
agencies and subagencies. For your assistance, I have
attached an outline (Attachment 2) showing the information
which should be included in your proposals. For further
details on the program, please call Ed Thornhill , Hater
Conservation Manager , at (213 ) 250-6566 , or Wiley Horne ,
Director of Planning, at (213 ) /250-6217 .
ar Boronkay
EJT/gg
Attachments
cc : All Directors
TABLE 1
STANDARD WATER CONSERVATION MEASURES
AND ASSIGNED SAVINGS
Water Savings Gallons-Day
Measure Per Capita Per Household
Low-Flow Showerhead 7 .2 21. 6
Retrofit ,
2. 75 gpm @ 80 psi
Ultra Low-Flow Showerhead, 10. 5 31. 5
1. 5 gpm or less @ 80 psi
Low-Flush Toilet Retrofit , 8 . 0 24 . 0
3 . 5 gallon per flush
Ultra Low-Flush Toilet , 16 . 0 48 . 0
1 . 5 gallons per flush
Low-Cost Retrofit Kit ,
installed by agency 6 . 5 19 . 5
Mass mailed 1 . 7 5 . 1
Higher-Cost Retrofit ,
Installed by agency 11 .2 33 . 6
Door Hang/Follow up 6 . 0 24 . 0
TABLE 2
TYPICAL EXAMPLES OF METROPOLITAN' S
CONSERVATION CREDITS
(per 10,000 installations)
Term of Estimated Program Conservation
Measure Agreement Water Savings Cost Credit ***
Ultra-Low- 30 yrs. 16 Sped, or $5,000,000 $403,500
Flush Toilet 48 gpd/hh, or
(1.5 gal) 17.520 gal/yr/hh,
or 538 AFY x
10 yrs . 5,380 AF
Ultra-Low-Flow 5 yrs. 10.5 gpcd, or $ 130,000 $ 65,000
showerhead, 31.5 gpd/hh, or
1.1 gpm model 11,498 gal/yr/hh,
or 353 AFY x
5 yrs = 1.765 AF
Retrofit 5 yrs . 11.2 gpcd, or $ 150.000 $ 75,000
hardware 33 .6 gpd/hh, or
package' 12 ,264 gal/yr/hh,
or 376 AFY x
5 yrs = 1,880 AF
Retrofit 2 yrs. 6 .5 gpcd, or $ 10,000 $ 5,000
kit-- 19.5 gpd/hh, or
7 ,118 gal/yr/hh
or 218 AFY x
2 yrs = 436 AF
* Contains two 2-gpm showerheads, 2 toilet dam inserts, leak
detection tablets; savings based on installation by agency.
** Contains toilet bag insert, showerhead flow restrictor, dye
tablets; savings based on installation by agency.
**x 575. 00/AF for each AF of estimated savings , or one-half of progra-.
cost , whichever is less.
Example 1 : The Standard Program
Program and Cost
A member agency, City •A" , proposes to install 10,000
retrofit plumbing kits in an area served by Metropolitan. Each
kit contains two showerheads (chrome on brass) , two toilet dams
(steel ) , dye tables to check for toilet leaks, and water
conservation brochures . The hardware package costs $7 .50:
house-by-house distribution costs an additional $7 . 50 per
package. The installed cost is $IS per package, or
$150 , 000 total .
Water Savings
Each installed package is estimated to save
11.2 gallons per capita per day; for an average household
savings of 33 . 6 gallons per day, at 3 people per dwelling unit .
These savings have been documented in several well-controlled
studies during the last few years , as described in the AWWA
Water Conservation Guidebook.
City A documents 10. 000 installations, which would save
336 , 000 gallons per day , or 376 acre-feet per year (AF/yr ) .
City A also documents that the total water savings is from water
furnished by Metropolitan, and not from local sources .
Value to Metropolitan
Metropolitan would pay one-half the project cost , or
$75 . 000 . if the water savings to Metropolitan justify the
expenditure. Each installation is considered secure for at
least five years . Therefore, the minimum savings are
5 yr X 376 AF/yr - 1, 880 AF .
At the minimum avoided energy cost of $75/AF, the value
of savings would be $75/AF X 1. 880 AF = $141. 000 . This value of
savings justifies Metropolitan paying one-half the project cost ,
or $75 , 000, with City A paying the other half . Since the
savings and cost for this type of measure are well documented ,
other than proof of installation, no additional review Would be
necessary. In this case, because the savings are considered
firm, and most of City Ass cost would be in the first year , the
full conservation credit of $75.000 Would be deducted from the
water bill after year one.
-2-
`..� Example 2 : A Special Case
Program Definition and Cost
Municipal Water District •B, " a member agency,
proposes a leak detection and repair program covering its
entire service area . There are 100.000 miles of water mains
to be checked and repaired as necessary. The program would
involve purchasing a specially equipped van for $60.000,
providing a trained staff of two technicians whose salaries
and benefits total $200. 000 each year, and retaining
consulting/training services in the amount of $50.000 to get
the program started . Allowing a life cycle of ten years for
the program, and charging vehicle operating and maintenance
costs at £0. 50 per mile and assuming 10. 000 miles per year .
the start-up cost of the leak detection program would be
approximately $310. 000, making no allowance for the cost of
repairing the leaks .
Start-Up Costs
Crew salaries , benefits $200, 000
Consultant/training 50,000
Specially equipped van 60 , 000
$310 , 000
Annual costs thereafter would be on the order of $255 , 000
per year for crew costs and vehicle operation and
maintenance , and actual repair of leaks .
Annual Costs
Crew salaries , benefits £200, 000/yr
Vehicle 06M 5, 000/yr
Actual repair of leaks 50. 000/yr
£255 , 000/yr
Water Savincs
Based on previous experience , water main leak
detection ma}' save on the order of 1 to 3 percent of total
-3-
annual deliveries through a large system. Assuming total
retail sales in Member B ' s area of 200,000 AF/yr , a possible
estimate of savings might be 2 .000 to 6.000 AF/yr , once the
entire system is surveyed and repairs made. At the minimum
avoided energy cost of 675/AF, and assuming that 00 percent
of the total savings would be from water supplied by
Metropolitan, we would expect that Metropolitan' s avoided
costs would eventually amount to $120. 000 per year , or more
(2.000 AF/yr x f75/AF E SO%) .
Cost sharing
Metropolitan would agree to pay one-half the start
up cost of $310, 000, or E155. 00D, in view of the high
probability of out savings exceeding that amount . Based on
water audit data, Member B believes that the program will
save at least 1 percent of total deliveries (2,00D AF/yr )
after three years and 2 percent of total deliveries
(4 . 000 AF/yr ) after six years . This would avoid $460. 000 per
year in rate payments to Metropolitan after three years , and
$920,000 per year after six years , at our treated water rate
of $230/AF . Member B pays the annual costs of $255 , 000, and ,
even considering overhead costs , expects to have positive
cash flow by year three and full cost recovery by year five
or six .
8-1
�..i METROPOI/TAN WATfR 0/STR/C7 OF SO(/THERN G7[/fORN/A
August S. 1988
(Water Problems Committee--Action)
k Board of Directors (Finance and Insurance Committee--Information ;
rMffl. General Manager
Aderr. Financial Incentives for Water Conservation
Summary
Metropolitan ' s Board has established a firm policy
of supporting water conservation. It is estimated that
Metropolitans service area is currently saving 200, 000 acre-
feet per year (AFY) of water through conservation, and our
facility planning includes a long-term goal of saving
450. 000 AFY by 2010 . To help reach this goal and to assist
the drought effort , this letter proposes a "Conservation
Credits', incentive program similar to the incentives
contained in Metropolitan' s Local Projects Program. The
program would be implemented in coordination with the member
agencies , reviewed from time to time as experience is gained ,
and reports made to your Board on its effectiveness .
In brief , Metropolitan would pay up to one-half of
the direct cost of a new water conservation project , provided
Metropolitan ' s contribution is justified by the value of the
water savings to Metropolitan and by the local need for our
participation. The value to Metropolitan of the water saved
would be based on our avoided energy cost , as in the Local
Projects Program. Each project agreement over $75 , 000 would
be submitted to your Board for approval and funding . The
program includes flexibility for assisting new and emerging
technology, demonstration projects , and other projects where
special circumstances , opportunities , and benefits apply.
California Environmental Quality Act requirements will be
complied with before entering into any agreement.
Recommendation
1 . That the Board of Directors approve, in concept ,
the water conservation credits program set forth in this
letter .
Board of Directors -2- August s , 19as
2 . That the General Manager be authorized to request
proposals from the member agencies for water conservation
projects which would be considered for participation on an
individual basis, substantially as set forth in this letter .
Funding for each qualifying project over $75,000 will be
requested upon project approval by the Board.
Detailed Report
Backaround
Your Board, .through its Administrative Code and the
Regional Urban Water Management Plan, has established firm
policies supporting water conservation. Financial incentives
are an effective means of carrying out these policies .
In July 1985 , your Board adopted a Water Management
Plan which identified several water conservation measures to
be evaluated and implemented . These measures included
plumbing retrofit , California Irrigation Management
Information System (CIMIS ) , Reriscape, leak detection,
industrial , and promotional programs . Financial incentives
were identified as a measure to be evaluated.
In August 1987, your Board placed its formal policy
on water conservation in the Administration Code . The policy
states :
" It shall be the policy of the District to
undertake and support water conservation programs .
To that end, the District may develop and implement
such programs and enter into agreements with member
public agencies and other organizations to make
more efficient use of water resources through water
conservation programs no long as such agreements
serve a beneficial purpose of the District. "
(Administrative Code, Section 4209)
Metropolitan' s Water Conservation Goals
Southern California has a tradition of water
conservation . Our region is now saving an estimated 200 , 000
acre-feet of water each year through water conservation
measures , and our facility planning includes a long-term
goal of saving 450 , 000 AFY by 2010.
`.✓ The proposed program for assisting water
conservation is analogous to our Local Projects Program.
�.d Board of Directors -3- August 8, 1988
which provides financial incentives for water reuse and
other local projects. Although serving no retail customers ,
Metropolitan can act in conjunction with the member agencies
to offer financial incentives to retail agencies to implement
conservation measures which release Metropolitan water for
other uses.
Proposed incentive Program
Water conservation has both local and regional
benefits . The local benefits include reduced sever
loadings , reduced use of electricity and natural gas for
heating water , and reduced water distribution costs .
Regional water supply benefits include reduced cost of
aqueduct pumping and potential savings in treatment and
distribution costs .
In many cases , however , the local benefits of
conservation are not sufficient to offset total project
costs , which would include direct program costs such as new
staffing and hardware , as well as administrative overhead ,
loss of rate revenue by retail water purveyors, and other
factors .
In such cases , a sharing of costs between local
entities and Metropolitan is proposed . Under the proposed
program, Metropolitan would pay up to one-half of the direct
costs of new water conservation measures that reduce demands
on Metropolitan, provided that Metropolitan ' s contribution
is justified by the value of the water saved and by the
local need for Metropolitan' s assistance . As with the Local
Projects Program, the value of the water saved would be
based on Metropolitan ' s avoided cost of pumping State
project water , and the conservation credit would be deducted
from the participating member agencies ' water bill . The
avoided cost of pumping would be the Department of Water
Resources ' (DWR) average sale price for surplus energy on
the State project , multiplied by a net lift of 3 .000 kWh/AF
through the East Branch Aqueduct, and subject to a minimum
or floor value of $75/AF, like the Local Projects Program.
Whether a project needs Metropolitan ' s assistance
to be financially feasible would depend on total project
cost , loss of retail rate revenue, local benefits, and
possibly other factors . Projects undertaken essentially for _
purposes other than to conserve water would normally not be
funded .
For measures with known technology and savings ,
the proposed program would utilize a standard review and
Board of Directors -4- August 8 , 1986
qualification process . A more detailed review process will
be needed for new and emerging technology, or for measures
whose savings depend on local circumstances . Each project
agreement would be negotiated on an individual basis , and
those agreements over $75.000 would be submitted to the
Board for approval and funding. Table 1 is a representative
listing of measures whose savings are well documented, while
Table 2 shows examples of how the conservation credits would
be calculated under the standard process. The standard
process will facilitate the implementation of most measures ,
provide for prompt action during droughts, and ensure equal
treatment of all member agencies . Special case projects
would include such measures as leak detection and repair ,
CIMIS , Xeriscape or "Water Wise', landscaping, industrial
process recycling, and others .
The program will be reviewed from time to time as
experience is gained , and reports made to your Board on its
effectiveness . Examples of a standard program and a
"Special Case" are attached .
Need for Flexibility
A particular project may have special benefits for
Metropolitan other than the energy savings . Such benefits
could include technology development, important research
results , protection of a vital resource, or permanent loss
of an opportunity if the project is not implemented . In
recommending approval and funding of specific projects , the
General Manager would consider such benefits .
Estimated Program Cost
The cost of the conservation credit program will
depend on the number of projects qualifying for
Metropolitans assistance each year . As a preliminary
estimate, it is assumed that 20 projects may qualify in the
first year . Using typical costs which are representative of
a variety of projects , the first year ' s outlay by
Metropolitan might be on the order of $1. 500, 000. Using
reasonable estimates , these 20 projects would save about
10, 000 acre-feet of water each year over a minimum period of
five years . The unit cost to Metropolitan would be about
$35 to $40 per acre-foot of water saved . As experience is
gained , we will update your Board on project costs , savings ,
and overall effectiveness .
Board of Directors -5- August 8 , 1966
Terms and Conditions for Agreements
The participants in a conservation credits
agreement would be Metropolitan, the appropriate member
agency, and a local sponsor (s ) , if different from the
member . In order to qualify for the conservation credits
program, a water conservation project must be a new project
which reduces demands on Metropolitan, and it must have
demonstrable water savings. The project must also be
technically sound and have local support by water agencies
and municipalities . Finally. Metropolitan's participation
rust be necessary to make the program financially and
economically feasible . Where practical and appropriate,
efforts will be made to obtain participation from benefiting
wastewater agencies or other beneficiaries .
California Environmental Quality Act requirements
wfll be complied with before entering into any agreement .
r , �
a�y
FWE/wit
At to chuer.ts
ATTACHMENT 2
EXHIBIT A
OUTLINE OF PROPOSED WATER CONSERVATION PROJECT
I. Design of Conservation Measure
A. Measure description
1. Target audience (customer class)
2 . Implementation method
a. Publicity, marketing plan, promotion
b. Give-aways
c. Rebates
d. Distribution
3 . Implementation schedule
a. Start up
b. Duration
C . Comnletion
d. Time of year , week , day
B. Labor and material requirements
1 . Agency staff
a . Time requirements
b. Responsibilities
2 . Contractor(s )
a. Time requirements
b . Responsibilities
c. Experience
3 . Device ( s ) selected
a. Manufacturer
b. Number of devices needed
C. Turnaround to get devices from manufacturer
d. Cost per device
e. Storage of device
�.r
A-2
4 . Artwork for marketing plan
a. Required artwork
b. Artwork performed by
c. Reproduction turnaround time
d. Number of copies
5. Training requirements
a. Training participants
b. Training materials
c. Training date
d. Training site
e. Cost of training
II . Marketing Plan
A. Preimplementation publicity plan
1. Media
2. Artwork
3. Press releases
4 . Notice to participants
B. During implementation plan
1. Media
2 . Communication with participants
III : Measure Implementation
A. Competitive bidding procedures for devices,
contract labor
B. Kick-off meeting/selection of control and test sites
C. Tracking and reporting during implementation
1 . Tracking of acceptance/installation rate
2. Implementation adjustment if installation/acceptance
rates low
D. Progress reports
1. Fifty percent progress report
2 . Final report
A-3
IV. Water Savings Analysis Procedure
A. Overall methodology used to determine savings
1. Means of determining short-term acceptance/installa-
tion/compliance rate
2. Means of determining long-term acceptance/installa-
tion/compliance rate
3. Means of determining water savings
B. Staff or consultant performing water savings analysis
C. Background/qualifications of person doing analysis
D. Selection of test site
1 . Required sample size
E. Selection of control group
1 . Required sample size
F. Determining installation/acceptance/compliance rate
a . Phone, drive-by, mail survey procedure
b. Estimate of long-term installation/acceptance/
compliance rate
G. Water Savings
a . For participating customers
b . Statistical significance test
V. Cost Estimate
A. Short-term costs
1 . Labor
a . Staff
b. Contracted
2 . Supplies
3 . Equipment
4 . Other direct costs
A-4
B. Long-term costs
1. Labor
a. Staff
b. Contracted
2. Supplies
3. Equipment
4. Other direct costs
C. Value of water saving to Metropolitan
D. Total amount requested
APPENDIX B
DRAFT WATER CONSERVATION PLAN
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
1 B 4 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
(714)962-2411
DRAFT
WATER CONSERVATION PLAN
March 1990
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. Introduction
B. Current Area Water Conservation Programs
C. Initiatives in Industrial Commercial and Institutional Water Conservation
D. Initiatives in Residential Water Conservation
E. Initiatives in Water Reclamation
F. Summary
\/
A. Introduction
The Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange
County (Sanitation Districts) have recently approved a comprehensive
Master Plan, Environmental Impact Report and an application for renewal
of our 301(h) Ocean Discharge Permit. These three major documents
combine to form what we have entitled, "2020 VISION", our 30-Year Action
Plan for Wastewater and Balanced Environmental Management. As part of
"2020 VISION" , the Boards have approved, in concept, programs that will
emphasize the beneficial reuse of sludge, the construction and operation
of additional water reclamation plants and the expansion and upgrading
of the Sanitation Districts' involvement in water conservation programs.
The Sanitation Districts' primary business is not the delivery of
potable water, thus our water conservation efforts in the past have been
limited. To date, the Sanitation Districts' efforts have focused on
measures enforced on our industrial dischargers through the industrial
waste ordinance. An expanded water conservation program will include a
comprehensive system of measures crafted for the Sanitation Districts
and will reinforce the efforts of other regional water agencies.
Moreover, active water reclamation in Orange County will continue and
expand as a part of cost-effective water resource management.
A large number and variety of agencies interact to achieve potable water
supply and water reuse in Orange County. Exhibit 1 shows the numerous
agencies involved, starting with imported water via the state water
project or the Colorado River aqueduct, through the Municipal Water
Districts (MWD) , Metropolitan Water Districts of Orange County (MWDOC) ,
Coastal Municipal Water District (CMWD), Orange County Water District
(OCWD) , local cities or retailers and finally to consumers. Exhibit 2
gives the location of retail water agencies in the county.
Exhibit 3 lists the key agencies with water management responsibilities
and their major programs affecting Orange County. Those agencies which
most directly affect the Sanitation Districts include: State Department
of Water Resources (DWR) , State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) ,
Department of Health Services (DOHS) and California Regional Water
Quality Control Boards (CRWQCB) .
B. Current Sanitation Districts and Area Water Conservation Programs
Current Orange County water conservation programs, summarized in Exhibit
4, show a focus on MWD, CMWD, MWDOC and OCWD. Their conservation
programs emphasize public education, system management and urban
landscape programs. Up to this point in time, the Sanitation Districts
implemented water conservation program has focused on industrial,
commercial and institutional facilities.
In addition to industrial water conservation, the Sanitation Districts
have developed an active conservation education program. Although not a
direct means of flow reduction, education is an essential step toward
implementation of direct conservation measures. If consumers are to be
-1-
EXHIBIT 1
AGENCY INTERRELATIONSHIPS
IMPORTED WATER LOCAL
WATER
SANTA ANA
COLORADO NO. CALIFORNIA RIVER
RIVER STATE WATER GROUND
AQUEDUCT PROJECT WATER
BASIN
CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT< COUNTY
OF WATER RESOURC S SANITATION
(DWR) DISTRICTS
OF OUNTY
COUNTY
(CSDOC)
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT
OF SO. CALIFORNIA(MWD)
--- -------- --------- --I
WATER ADVISORY COMMITTEE
OF ORANGE COUNTY (WACO)
MUNICIPAL
COASTAL WATER ORANGE
MUNICIPAL
L WATER
DISTRICT
DISTRICT OF ORANGE DISTRICT
o (CWMD) (MWDOC) (OCWD)
r w
W �
2 a
I a 2 LL
a Q
2
a
N
n
RETAILING AGENCIES `/
CONSUMERS
EXI non z _
LOCATION OF RETAIL WATER AGENCIES
CONTRACTING AGENCY BOUNDARIES
IONM LINDA
COUNTY WATER
DISTRICT
CITY OF
ORE
SOW.C. SANTIAGO COUNTY
CITY OF WATER DISTRICT
LA IYBRA
SANTA ANA MOUNTAINS
COUNTY WATER
CITY OF FULLERTON SERRANO DISTRICT
IPPI6 AT ON
DISTRICT
EAST
CITY OF ORANGE ORANGE
COUNTY
WATCH
CITY OF ANATEIM 019 TRICT LOS
CITY OF IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT ALIIS 1OS
EP
'UENA PARK DISTRICT
SANTA MARGARITA WATER DISTRICT
CITY OF EL
GARDEN GROVE TORO
CITY OF SANTA ANA WATER
DISTRICT
SOUTHERN
CPL IfONHIA
wI ER NOULTON NIBUEL
COMIR• NY CITY OF WATER DISTRICT
WE57Y1N9fER LI TY OFSANTA 1 HEIGHTS
OUN WATER
CO.IRIN MPtER CO CAV]i MMO
TALL EY VALLEY
WAFER
CITY OF MESA LILY OF DISTRICT
CONSOLIDATED TRY CITIES
SfA1 SEA NEWPORT
WATER CH
tlEAtll MUNICMUNICIPAL
DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT
CITY OF NUN TINOTON BEACH
19
v LAOUNA BEACH COUNTY `
WATER DISTRICT
SOUTH COAST COUNTY
WATER DISTRICT
® NOT INCLUDED IN JURISDICTION OF A RETAIL WATER AGENCY
EXHIBIT 3
KEY AGENCIES WITH WATER MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES AFFECTING ORANGE COUNTY
Aeenw Level Role Responsibilities Mawr Proemens Other Commcros
US. Bureau of Reclamation(USBR) l3ederal Planning,designing,and operating weer supply Operates Califomu'a Central Valley Project;
projee.in the Western States. apµ)nums water fran the Colorado Riser.
Depanment of Water Resources(DW R) State protecting and conserving Cdifomu's water Planning,construction.and operation of state
rescnoirs.planning to meet Celifomia's water needs water projects;Rood control operations;rarely
from all available sources,and providing for public of dams;and data collection and evaluation
.rely in relation to water resources. (desalination,mclamation,son melon).
State Water Resources Contra!Bomar State Selling statewide policies on ester pollution control, Clean Water Grant Program and Water Rights Assists Regional Water Quality Control
(SWRCB) administering water rights,and providing technical Administration. Bond,Santa Ana Region.
and legal assistanm to nine regional aaalcr quality
control boanL.
Department of Health Services(DO11S) State Regulating controls for public wmler supplies and Implememation of Safe Drinking Water An Works clocly with Orange County licalth
mewl M harardous wastes. and llaraWom Materials Management Department to implement programs.
activities.
1T Melmppoolion Water Dial of Regional Distributes ram sells a Mend ed Colorado River and The system includes 8 reservoirs,VS miles of Orange Countys source of importedwaler,
Southern Gbiennia(MWD) state perfect waters to 29 member agencies in pipelines,5 filtration plants nM 12 power
Soathcm California for domestic,municipal, plants. Provides wmer to 13 million people.
agricultural and groundwater replenishment purpmes
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Regional Dev doping a water yy ality mnlml plan for the Santa Preparing a basin plan eslablishing salinity fond Powers AgR my composed of O.,7,
(SAWPA) Ana R r Wecrshed� objectives m prortct me Sane Ana River for County Water District,Came Basin MWD,
gmumhvdcr replrnishmcm;constructing San Bernardino Valley MWD,Wesmm
Malewaler pipelines MWD,and Fastern MWD.
Regional Water Quality Control Board Regional One of nine regional boards responsible for direct Adopting water quality standards for ground Regional Board standards am designed to
San,.Ana Region(RWQCB) regulatory control of caste discharge.Operates and surface waters within the Santa Ana River pprotect Uppper anJ lower San,.Ana
autonomously with SW RCB. Bain; issuing wane discharge .its ro Wat<rsh<Es for el beneficial taus Salinity
industrial and municipal dischargers. standards measured at Prado Dam ensure
against degradation of Orange County
gmunJwamr quality by upstream discharge.
Coastal Municipal Water Districts County Bring metropolitan water to coastal Orange County, Wholesaling water to six-mcmbcr agencies for Frst municipal water d'ntrict to become a
(Coastal) ingM1 southerly
Diego line.
��and Corm d6aninamm to 125,M people. member of MWD(1941).
Mess
Municipal Water District of Orange County Provide wholesale imported water for much of Wholesaling water to 32-member agencies for Originally established as Oran County
County(MWDOC) Orange County for domestic,municipal,agricultural distribution to 13 million People and operating Municipal Water District (195 );became
and groundwater replenishment uses. the Allen-McCulloch Pipeline. MWDOC in 1%9.
Orange County Water District(OCWD) County Manage Orange County',primary groundwater Capturing aM percolating Saner Ana River District boundaries medic approximately_
supply and yrote<t the mum/s nghts to water in the Bow; purchasing Import water for ao%of the County.31 rcpamle agencies m
Santa Ana River. groundwater recharge in the river and Orange County
or(nrcam reservoir spreading; treating CSDOC
secondary effluent for groundwater mchaW,
irrigation and other uses.
County Sanitarioa Districts of Orange County Treat and manage much of Orange Cmety s amgc Cdkcting and treating mwage from IA million
County(CSDOC) for ocean discharge and muse,in Orange County. ppee pple and providing high quality effluent to
OCWD;developing upstream oancr
reclamation treatment ylam wa s for groundter
rechaW.irrigation arM other reuses.
Various Ctim.Water Districts,and Intl Serve water to individual customers.
private Water Companies
EXHIBIT 4
WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAMS IN ORANGE COUNTY
Systems Management
(Metering, Pricing, Interior Residential
Leak Detection, Use (retrofit and Urban Landscape
Level of Government Public Education System Rehabilitillion) New Construction) Industrial Use IrriLalion
Slate-Deparlmenl of • Distribution of water •Water audit and leak Water Conservation Industrial portion of • Preparation of
Water Resources, conservation detection programs Kit distribution Urban Water technical information
Office of Water materials •Urban Water Rate Conservation on landscape water
Conservation • Centralized clearing Making manual Program management
house for water • Co-sponsorship of
conservation Xcriscape Seminars
information in
California
Regional-The • Conservation •Water audits Retrofit device • Co-sponsorship of
Metropolitan Water literature •Leak detection distribution Xeriscape Seminars
Districts of Southern • Water Watch •Meter calibration
California and replacement
• C=In-school program •Corrosion control
• Conservation •Valve exercising
seminars •Metering existing
• Displays/exhibits customers
• Literature and bill •Meter loan payment
sluffers to member •Water pricing
agencies analyses
County-Coastal, • 4-Slage school •Retail water agency Co-sponsorship of
bIWDOC, and OCWD program (MWDOC) conservation/ Xeriscape Seminars
reaching 80,000 information (MWDOC)
students/yr. programs (Coastal
including Ricki the and MWDOC)
Rambunctious
Raindrop and
Twelfth p i ht
Repertory Company.
• Information
distribution (Coastal,
MWDOC, and
OCWD)
• Tours of facilities
(MWDOC and
OCWD)
IRWD Pilot project Water
Conservation Kits
distribution
CSDOC Industrial Waste
Minimization
I'rogrun
S,wrtc: WAfY), 1'aW R GtiIIf1C Sniff.
receptive to the costs or inconvenience of water saving, they must be N../
informed of the benefits and be convinced of the need to save water.
They also must be supplied with "how to' information.
Views about the immediate availability of water and user habits are
deeply entrenched in the average consumer. Education is needed to
ensure that the public is well informed regarding California's water
resources and the need for water conservation. A well-planned
educational program creates a "water conscience" in the consuming
public.
Conservation education at the Sanitation Districts is a long-range and
repetitive program intended to promote a conservation ethic. The first
objective is to convince city and county officials and managers and
directors of water agencies and utilities of the usefulness of such a
program.
Advertising plays an important part in a water conservation/flow
reduction program. Many people can be reached by newspapers, magazines,
radio, and television.
Information is disseminated through written materials, such as bill
stuffers and pamphlets, and through buttons, bumper stickers and
posters. A speaker's bureau has been an effective way to spread the
message to the community at meetings, conferences, seminars, and
workshops. Materials for community presentations have been prepared and
employees trained for most effective results.
In-school conservation education is an integral part of any long-range
community conservation effort. Instructional materials have been
prepared on the subject by several California water agencies and DWR.
In addition, several California water agencies, DWR and the American
Water Works Association, offer general adult-level public education
information, such as information on low water-using landscapes and
advice on the use of water-saving devices in the home. Films are also
used at meetings and on plant tours.
Every children's group that tours the Sanitation Districts' treatment
facilities is shown a 13-minute film presentation on ways water is
wasted in the home. The film presentation is followed by a discussion
on the importance of water conservation and its relationship to the
Sanitation Districts' function.
Also, the Sanitation Districts is currently involved in a kindergarten
through 6th grade public education consortium that is developing
materials on environmental quality awareness. Plans for the program
include a discussion of the importance of water conservation and the
role conservation efforts play in overall environmental awareness. The
program also stresses the concept of personal responsibility toward
environmental impacts.
All public presentation slide shows by the Sanitation Districts' staff
include a discussion of water conservation. Slides have been specially
-2-
designed to communicate the ways in which water use can be reduced in
the home.
C. Initiatives in Industrial. Commercial and Institutional Conservation
The Introduction and Summary of the Sanitation Districts' 1989 revised
"Wastewater Discharge Regulations" states that two of the primary goals
of the Ordinance are:
• To require the reduction of water discharged to the sewer system.
• To require waste minimization and material substitution for
industrial users.
The Sanitation Districts have, since the late 1970's, encouraged water
conservation as a means to reduce the size of its pollution control
facilities and reduce the cost of operation both in water purchased and
wastewater discharged. The Sanitation Districts' industrial waste
inspectors are field oriented and have provided technical assistance to
a variety of dischargers on manufacturing process changes that may
reduce the wastewater discharge without suffering a loss in product
quality. Suggestions on better rinsing techniques and reuse or recycle
of water to a less critical use are in the technical repertoire of the
inspectors and the Sanitation Districts' engineers. The inspectors also
enforce the prohibition against single pass cooling water requiring
recycle to a cooling tower or air cooler, a chilled water system, or
reuse of the water in another piece of equipment in the manufacturing
process.
The Sanitation Districts' waste discharge permit system prevents
dilution and wasting water from being used to meet discharge limits.
The permit limit is based on mass emission rates, the average wastewater
flow and concentration of the pollutant. When a discharger is sampled
on a particular day to determine if they are in compliance with the
permit limits, they cannot just turn up the rinsewater to dilute the
concentrations.
Future plans to encourage and require water conservation among the
Sanitation Districts' industrial, commercial and institution dischargers
will be done as part of the Sanitation Districts' waste minimization
program. A multi-agency task force of the Orange County Health Care
Agency Waste Management Section, the South Coast Air Quality Management
Agency, and the Sanitation Districts have been assembled to provide a
multi-media land, air and water approach to waste minimization. The
Sanitation Districts implemented in January 1990, permit requirements
for a waste minimization plan and enforcement requirements for waste
minimization audits for chronic non-compliant dischargers.
The planned emphasis of the Sanitation Districts will first focus on
industrial water conservation techniques to reduce the wastewater flow.
Industries will either implement waste minimization and water
_3_
conservation techniques or be required to submit a report explaining why
they cannot achieve these goals. Eventually, as more firms show that
water conservation is practical, the Sanitation Districts hope to base
future waste discharge permit limits on the expected flow with water
conservation rather than permit limits based on present discharges.
After completion of this step with the more than 500 first priority
industries, the Sanitation Districts will turn its focus toward
commercial and institutional dischargers. These are a much larger
number of discharging entities typified as having significantly lower
wastewater flows per employee or per square foot of floor space.
D. Initiatives in Residential Water Conservation
The Sanitation Districts' newly adopted water conservation policy
states:
• Actively foster and promote water conservation;
• Develop cooperative programs with other public agencies to provide
public education, community use of water-saving devices, amend
plumbing codes, and other appropriate changes to help reduce water
usage.
To achieve the Sanitation Districts' water conservation goals, eight
major steps will be taken in 1990. These steps include accurate
definition of the Sanitation Districts' facilities, evaluation of
conservation alternatives, evaluation of political and institutional
factors affecting conservation implementation, survey of existing
conservation programs as examples, research and demonstration of
conservation devices and development of information and education
programs. This will produce a comprehensive and detailed conservation
plan and policy for consideration and implementation by the Boards.
After implementation, routine monitoring will provide the Sanitation
Districts with an understanding of the results being achieved. This
monitoring will provide an ongoing assessment of flow increases to be
used in determining timing of construction for trunk and treatment plant
expansions.
As a means of evaluating conservation alternatives, staff has created a
preliminary matrix in Exhibit 5. During the plan development we will
look at every type of conservation and rate it according to a variety of
factors. This preliminary matrix shows some of the factors to be used
including impact on Sanitation Districts' facilities. This is important
to help prioritize amongst the many alternatives. For example, in
residential conservation, landscape conservation is likely to have very
little effect on Sanitation Districts' facilities, whereas toilet
retrofit devices could be very significant. Exhibit 6 shows a
representative list of water conservation measures to be further
evaluated in this phase of the work.
-4-
EXHIBIT 5
CONSERVATION ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS EVALUATION MATRIX
Quantity Impact on Community
Type of Conservation Cost Saved f/ al CSDOC Facilities Reliability Performance Acceptance
A. Municipal
1. Fire righting
2. Plumbing code revisions
B. Residential
1. Pricing
2. Retrofit devices-toilets
a. Mini-Flush
C. Agricultural
1. Line canals
D. Industrial
1. Process Minimintion
E.Tourist
1. Educational Programs
F. Education
1. Youth curriculums
EXHIBIT 6
ALTERNATIVE WATER CONSERVATION MEASURES
Municipal Conservation Residential Conscrvadon
General Application
Fight foes with less water Public education
Implement equitable water rates that also Metering
achieve conservation Pricing:
Implement efficient metering practices Uniform rate blocks
Utilize on-site wastewater treatment recycling system Increasing rate blocks
Keep city parks green on less water using low-flow Penally charges
irrigation systems and low-water demand plants Demapd charges
Plan and finance system rehabilitation, retrofit and leak Leak detection
control System rehabilitation
Reduce water pressure while maintaining good service
Keep city streets clean with less water Imeticir Residential Use
Size water distribution systems with demand reductions
Size wastewater collection, treatment and distribution Retrofit devices:
systems with demand reductions Displacement bottles
Implement codes for increasing water efficiency; e.g.; Shower flow restrictors
plumbing futures, swimming pools, water waste, etc Toilet dams
Efficiently irrigate large landscapes; e.g., golf courses, Low-flow shower heads
parks, cemeteries, and schools Pipe insulation
Design water-efficient landscapes; e.g., Xcrisrape Pressure regulators
Maintain water-efficient landscapes Faucet aerators
Install water-efficient landscapes Water-efficient appliances
Distribution system leak detection program Devices for new construction:
Develop low water-using landscape ordinances for new and Low-flush toilets
existing developments Pressure regulators
Landscape water audit Air-assisted showers
Distribution system water audit Faucet aerators
Provide incentives to developers for incorporating water Wmertffncicw appliances
conservation
Sources of water-elrcient landscape plant materials Urban Landscape Irrigation
Employee education programs
Reduced watering
Low water-msc planting
Sprinkler systems
Scheduled irrigation
Moisture-sinning controllers
Dual water systems
Turf reduction
Water cops
EXHIBIT 6 (Cons.)
ALTERNATIVE WATER CONSERVATION MEASURES
Agricultural Conservation Industrial Conservation
Use reclaimed water for irrigation Reduce industrial process and waste return flows
Increase crop yields while reducing water use Reuse water or use reclaimed water for industrial
Determine when it is not profitable to continue applications; eg, cooling water, breweries,
irrigating elec roaia, paper processing, food processing,
Implement equitable agriculture water rates that metal plating foundries, and aircraft
conserve water Use reclaimed water for commercial uses; e.g.,
Do agriculture irrigation evaluations laundries, car washing, cooling, air conditioning,
Develop efficient agriculture irrigation schedules hospitals, and zoos
Reduce water use by reducing fertilizer and Industrial water audit
pesticide use while maintaining or increasing Use low-flow irrigation systems and low-water
yield through sludge compost use as a soil demand plants for industrial landscaping
amendment Employee education programs
Maximize agriculture management profits by Use high tech irrigation timing
better managing existing irrigation systems; e.g., Sanitary systems retrofit
furrow, border, sprinkler, drip, linear move, Construction site water control
center pivot
Line canals without emptying them
Use low energy precision application of water of
crops
Proper crop management to protect and conserve Conservation Education
water
Role of new crop hybrids that need less water Develop youth education curriculum and
Feld setup using laser leveling to maximize water programs
use Sell conservation programs
Tail water recovery and use Develop and implement local conservation plan
Develop education programs at zoos, museums,
parks and water treatment facilities
Tourist Conservation Produce a water conservation conference
Joint programs with MWDOC and other area
Develop education programs at recreation agencies
facilities, resorts, hotels, motels, and restaurants local community awareness campaigns
Install Xeriscapes Media managemeat for news, educational
Employee education programs opportunities and public service advertisements
Point-of-sale education
To accomplish these objectives, the Sanitation Districts have added a
new full-time professional staff member responsible for the Sanitation
Districts' water conservation programs. The key responsibilities of
this person include:
• Monitor current Sanitation Districts' conservation programs;
• Coordinate with City, County and State agencies;
• Research, evaluate and recommend water conservation means and
devices;
• Develop public education programs for schools, industry, groups and
others;
• Create a comprehensive Conservation Plan evaluating alternatives,
public acceptance and institutional factors affecting Sanitation
Districts' programs;
• Aggressively implement adopted Plan; and
• Monitor and coordinate with federal, state and regional regulators
responsible for water conservation.
E. Initiatives in Water Reclamation
Reclamation of wastewater for reuse in lieu of potable water has been
studied and practiced for over 50 years in California. During that
time, there have been more than 350 safe and reliable water reuse
projects with no known detrimental health effects.
Water reclamation in Orange County, including south County activities,
presently equals about 23.6 million gallons-per-day (mgd) , which is more
than 8.6 billion gallons-per-year. Of this total, the Sanitation
Districts are responsible for 32 percent through on-site irrigation at
the two plants and groundwater recharge of treated secondary effluent
accomplished by the Orange County Water District. In about 18 months,
the first phase of the Green Acres project will be complete which will
add up to 6.25 mgd of reused water. With implementation of this
project, the Sanitation Districts' contribution to reclamation in Orange
County will rise to 43 percent.
From previous planning studies, the wastewater reclamation potential in
Orange County was estimated to equal about 150,000 acre-feet per year
which equals 135 mgd. This information is summarized in Exhibit 7.
"2020 VISION" established long-term planning goals for water reclamation
which include:
• construct and operate three new upstream water reclamation plants;
• continue providing secondary effluent for reclamation;
• continue cooperation with other water agencies; and,
• develop new reuse markets to maximize reclamation.
-5-
EXHIBIT 7
PRESENT AND POTENTIAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION WITHIN ORANGE COUNTY
(AF/YEAR)
Total
Present
Prcacnt Planned ProieCts' and Other
Avenoy' use Phase I R Adilitional Planned Potential
IRRIGATION
IRWD' 10,370 4,430 0 6,780 21,580 34,000
LAWD 0 0 2,190 1,125 3,315 0
NINW'D/AWMA 500 850 0 2,080 3,430 4,470
SMWD 900 1,280 0 0 2,180 4,820
LHSD 750 0 0 0 750 0
SCCWD 50 860 0 0 910 0
SCWD/No. Irvine 0 0 0 0 0 600
OCWD' 0 3,5M 0 1,330 5,280 3,500
SC 3,600 0 0 0 3,600 0
CSDOC' 73. 0 0 0 2366 0
Subtotal 16,406 10,920 2,190 11,315 41,281 52,790
GROUNDWATER RECHARGE
OCW'D:
-Alamitos Barricr 0 0 0 5,400 5,400 0
-Anaheim Forebav 0 0 0 L,000 12,000 12,000
-Water Factory 21's I0.000 0 0 0 10.000 IS fM
Subtotal 10,000 0 0 17,400 27,400 30,000
TOTAL 26,406 10,920 2,190 28,715 68,681 82,790
PRTED, /nine Ranch Water District; LAWD, Los Alisos Water District;MNWD, Moulton Niguel Water District AWMA,Aliso
[(rater Management Agency;Sill' D, Santa Margarita Water District, LHSD, Lemon Heights Sanitary District;SCCIirD, South
Coast County Water District,,SCWD, Santiago County Water District, OCWD, Orange County Water District;SC, Cin,of San
Clemente; CSDOC County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
' Yield derived fronn MWD Local Projects Status Repon, September 1982 and Orange and Los Angeles Counties Water Reuse
Study, Facilities Plan, April 1982.
' Updated per 19841RWD Gsigation/Reclamadon System Master Plan and to include the OCWD Green Acres Project.
' CSDOC contribution based on 12-month running average ending July 1989 equals 4300 AF/1EAR which is 83%of total
10,000 AF/YEAR for Present Use for groundwater recharge by OCWD at Water Factory 2L
' CSDOC total contribution through on-sire irrigation and groundwater recharge equals 32%of Total Present Use.
Source:WACO, 1986 and CSDOC staff mxanh, 1989.
The Action Plan included evaluations of alternative sites for potential r./
water reclamation plants. Exhibit 8 shows the location of 18
possibilities which were narrowed to three high-priority sites. The
site selection criteria used in this process are shown in Exhibit 9. A
weighting system was applied to these criteria and the result was the
rankings shown in Exhibit 10.
These projects were further evaluated for their cost-effectiveness
compared to the price of water from MWD. Exhibit 11 shows that the top
three projects would be cost-effective within the next 15 years.
Exhibit 12 lists the retail water rates throughout Orange County as of
1985 for a comparison.
In total, these three projects would amount to 43 mgd of additional
water reclamation, an increase of 161 percent over existing water
reclamation projects in Orange County. These projects are summarized as
follows:
• Crescent Basin - 25 mgd
• Seal Beach - 13 mgd
• Forebay - 5 mgd
The majority of the water reclaimed by these three plants would be
injected into the groundwater either for seawater intrusion barrier or
to replenish groundwater drinking supplies. A summary of the potential
water uses for these three plants is provided in Exhibit 13.
The largest of the three potential water reclamation plants is Crescent
Basin at 25 mgd. Its proposed location, shown in Exhibit 14, is
adjacent to the Santa Ana Freeway, a short distance from Brookhurst
Street and adjacent to Crescent Avenue. This is approximately a
10-acre site.
Staff has recently been informed of the availability of a new potential
water reclamation plant site owned by the Wastewater Disposal Company.
The 5.74-acre parcel is located near the intersection of Orangethorpe
and State College Boulevard in Fullerton. Staff is evaluating the
feasibility of this site for a water reclamation plant and will compare
it to the proposed Crescent Basin project. This preliminary comparison
was completed in January 1990.
Implementing water reclamation projects will require the Sanitation
Districts to work through numerous federal, state, and regional
regulatory agencies. A brief summary of these regulations is presented
in Exhibit 15. The issuance of permits for a reclamation project is by
the DOHS and CRWQCB who have had these responsibilities delegated to
them.
The Sanitation Districts' water reclamation projects may be severely
constrained by recently proposed DOHS Title 22 regulation revisions.
The state agency has suggested that reclaimed water for groundwater -
injection should be blended with fresh water at a ratio of 20:80,
-6-
EXHIBIT 8
r _ _
ALTERNATIVE SITES
FOR A POTENTIAL
WATER RECLAMATION PLANT
COUNTY SANITATION OISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
MASTER PLAN REPORT
EXHIBIT 9
SITE SELECTION EVALUATION CRITERIA
A Site Availability
Weighting Factor = 3
B. Sufficient Wastewater Tributary to Diversion Point J
C. Seismic Hazard
D. Mitigation Requirements
E. Ease of Interceptor Separation
F. Influent Wastewater Quality j Weighting Factor = 2
G. Proximity to Water Reuse Areas
H. Proximity to Area/Sensitive Environmental Constraints
I. Site Area, Shape, Access Flexibility
J. Implementation Requirements Weighting Factor = 1
K Proximity to Discharge Locations
EXHIBIT 10
v
SITE RANKINGS
Alternative Site
Evaluation
Rank No. Location JCItv Points(a)
1 7 'Crescent Retarding Basin': Anaheim 149
Crescent Ave. and 1-5
2 13 Seal Beach Blvd. and Westminster Ave. Seal Beach 140
(US. Naval Weapons Station)
3 10 Tustin Ave. and la Palma Ave. Anaheim 130
4 6 Kellogg Dr. and La Palma Ave. Anaheim 128
5 8 Lincoln Avenue at Santa Ana River Unincorporated 125
6 9 SR 91 and AT&SF RR Anaheim 122
7 18 OC Steel Salvage - Anaheim 121
SR 91 at AT&SF RR
8 15 'Douglas Transfer Station' Anaheim 120
Douglas Rd. and Katella Ave.
9 11 'Anaheim Forcluty" Anaheim 107
at Santa Ana River
10 17 Santiago Hills, East Orange Unincorporated 105
11 14 Euclid St. and Chapman Ave. Garden Grove 105
12 16 Moulton Pkwy. and Jamboree Rd. Tustin 99
13 2 Beach Blvd. near Rosecrans Ave. Unincorporated 98
14 5 Kraemer Blvd. and Alta Vista St. Placentia 90
15 1 Puente St. and Lambert Rd. Brea 89
16 3 Dale St. and Malvern Ave. Buena Park 89
17 4 Associated Rd. and Bastanchury Rd. Fullerton 83
18 12 Santiago Creek gravel pits Unincorporated 71
(a) Maximum possible is 210 points.
EXHIBIT 11
COST-EFFECITVENESS OF PRIORITY PROJECTS
Potential Water 1989 Unit Cost
Reclamation Plant 1989 Reclamation Adjusted
Capital Facilities for MWD
Site Cost Unit Cost Subsidy
Facility 'Q �(SS.000) ($/acre-foot) (S/acre-foot)
Crescent Basin WRP 7 129,830 490 - 75'= 415
Seal Beach WRP 13 56,630 515 • 75 - 440
Forebay WRP 10 31,200 335 - 75 - 260
'MWD subsidy _
PROJE= WATER RATES FOR MWD TREATED,
NON-INTERRUPTIBLE SUPPLIES
]'sue Water Rate (S/acre-foot)
1988-89 230
1995 320
2000 425
2005 460
2010 480
2015 500
�.r
EXHIBIT 12
1985 RETAIL WATER RATES
IN ORANGE COUNTY
Agency Water Rate (S/AF)'
Garden Grove . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214
Huntington Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221
Westminster . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231
Yorba Linda County Water District . . . . . . . 234
Serrano Irrigation District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 240
Buena Park . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . 267
Santa Ana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272
Southern California Water Company. . . . . . . 302"
Orange . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 304
Anaheim . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 307
Fountain Valley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310
Irvine Ranch Water District . . . . . . . . . . . . . 335
Moulton Niguel Water District . . . . . . . . . . . 334
Capistrano Beach County Water District . . . . 348
Fullerton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 355
Scal Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357
Brea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 362
La Habra . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 371
Tustin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 394
Newport Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 396
La Palma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 403
Santa Ana Heights Water Company . . . . . . . 408
Los Alisos Water District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 420
San Clemente . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 430
Orange Park Acres Mutual Water Company . 436
Laguna Beach County Water District . . . . . . 461
Capistrano Valley Water District . . . . . . . . . 470
Mesa Consolidated Water District . . . . . . . . 497
Santa Marguerila Water District . . . . . . . . . . 529
Lemon Heights Mutual Water Company . . . . 579
South Coast County Water District . . . . . . . . 598
Santa Ana Mountains County Water District . 589
Laguna Hills Water Company . . . . . . . . . . . . 606
Santiago County Water District . . . . . . . . . . 741
AVERAGE PRICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . 392
Bared upon a apical manrhty con fm/xWa gaBau
-Dort nW indudc Cowan Neig/
Source: WACO. 1986.
v
EXHIBIT 13 .,�,
SUMMARY OF RECLAIMED WATER MARKETS
Crescent Basin WRP
Average Annual
Potential Use Demand (MG/YR)
Kimberly Clark 866
Beatrice 238
Disoevland 219
Wrarher Corporadon/Disneyland Hotel 121
Knoll's Berry Farm 107
Hughes Aircraft 103
Local parks, golf courses, schools 510
Groundwater recharge 100
TOTAL 5,814
Seal Beach WRP
Potential User Average Annual
Demand (MG/YR)
Alamitos Gap Barrier 2,190
THUMS Long Beach Oil Well Feld Injection, Long Beach 522
Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station 815
TOTAL 3,527
Forebay WRP
Average Annual
Potential User Demand (MG/YR)
Birch Hills Golf Course
Imperial Golf Course
Tri-Ciries Park
Craig Regional Park
Cal State Fullerton
Alta Vista Country Club
Yorba Linda Country Club
Yorba Linda Lakebed
Carbon Canyon Regional Park
TOTAL 1,825
v
m 2bm AROFy1ST+ m 20n N N _
VELPRECY ST D ° 1`- O i n \ _HANOVER o HANOVER ST, ram- < PL 1000
U O - < m _�z� N a 1" '% ST a A c� G� HOME!PI-
Z p 3 0 r x 1- z GAIN r ,- z gARCOURT m x
LA rm z — r n
Jp '� r m �� r HAMPTONm1 Si Z ;��', S00 Q 1 m in z m ITr,RON0
m Z m L I. �c� O HAMPTON ]) n L U Z
a r- aL ' "1 ! - 1 O < ;. . m ,<. ST z HAMPTON
r K ,- r
ISTER_ qti� Z oBAKER , ST MONUMENT a Cl _a, to CAMRRIAST in < RAYIIOWIX
J- _
F ; C n ALOr1A PL a ; ;mf m MODENA ST ST
ROANNE < ST z < m p • n < < _ I^.n '= i Z BRUCF. PL
{ 1 ROANNE ST
z ,' rj 2 L y n n CA PL
IRUC[ ST BRUCE -. N s y z �) 0,2 N n
�� %a 500 < n TV - sr :•o n i:� p m < < � < <
$ < GILBERT S11. $ r :: � o: o m v011KE INEw
< r':.. � ! JNU n ;SY:F::, . .L: GENEVA S7 v Pt- n
Jr- 0 1ILLVIEW y n < ZOOS IOIIN ?%.,, . ., r;- p----� A <
y1z r z 25-RD < 00 1000
,T.�..o.. ^y o �I LAND LN O N
c m o 9400 LN :m I o
EY ST< u• Ii CDR 4E ST
In �11 m A E vb .., �I N - 1-.ary m I MORAGA n.. MOfTAGA ST € _
Z (�° Si l3 op : : .I I y I ALA MO Sl
�ZA ...• :i!I 7: 't m•, i.': :.. ALAMO r'I
CH GGLE v i22 W IA ST f k�' t2 ;. ..' ST m
O ST ..,WIMI ST ... .. .hl"I- ._. ol'p : Z.;�p - I NTURA ^.•E. .,? VENTURA —y I
_ .. Mt'gSE, •c s EY Sl fv h: •�.. ` ST ST a
MIIIS " �' 1111PILE RSMrr r 1 •'} m . I ^ MONT ERE
Y
-0 ENU n p9 AV ' H IE ST -2L'�'1 s I _ < <. ST
EO n ` �_- TA IN DR I; A � I �• _ - :- y SIESTA
a.�l •* <n ..-.....r.<: xy..! r; ST
>
:11
N FO S
OOKMUR Ro
in
H z N
" w 0 (n �QO� ID 2 100 (_A ILN ST :z mn Ig
Dr , m HER o$T r Iu •+ � ,i I§LAi VA_IIEY ,NI .BEY 500< � F m ST z � IVY L-° � nar00 - "- - - ! ��•� ti
o m \ D S • vAI II Y Sl - �S �}AL:' ' 8
ST EMPIRE. (•T y y �nTle WY�y, " AI UDIND
AMEL A ST AIAUUIM 2 1 m WAKI FOREBt uu ,.
in mn r--� m ST s cT@€HN!E�E' I � I CLIms dIIOLI.Y- - -
a n PRIMROSE ;. S1 < n CAROL. DR olf - AR FERN S
AGATE < pL� rI DAIILIA DR v . Utit.
WT� o
'� �ur'ni„ fl T PI 4Dt �� .{y h :• IAIRVIFW Sl o_
EXHIBIT 15
SUMMARY OF WATER RECLAMATION REGULATIONS
Major Criteria
or
A ,en" Level Reaulalions Constraints Comments
U.S. EPA Federal Safe Drinking Water AU (PL93.523) Sets national drinking water
standards.
U.S. EPA Federal Clean Water Act(PL95-217) Sets national wastewater
treatment standards and
encourage wastewater
reclamation.
State Water Resources Stale California Water Code;The Porter- Policies, procedures and
Control Board (SWRCB) Cologne Water Quality Control ALI; guidelines for implementing
Policy and Action Plan for Water water reclamation projects.
Reclamation in California; Executive
Order B-36-77
Dept. Water Resources Slate California Water Plan; Wastewater Criteria for reclaimed water
(DWR) Reuse Law of 1974 (AB 3515) use to protect public health.
Stale Air Resources Board Slate
Dept. of Health Services State Title 22, CAC-Wastewater
(DOHS) Reclamation Criteria
Orange County County Review and comment on RWQCB
Environmental Health permit proposals
Agency
Regional Water Quality Regional At a local level, enforces all aspects of
Control Board (RWQCB) stale and federal law and regulations
Pertaining to water.
Southern California Air Regional Al a local level,enforce all aspects of
Quality Management stale and federal laws and regulations
District ((SCAQMD) pertaining to air.
v reclaimed to fresh. It is likely this criteria would change the cost-
effectiveness of the Sanitation Districts' water reclamation projects.
Staff is working jointly with OCWD to revise this proposal.
Staff estimates that it will take about five years to bring this project
on-line, will need five separate major studies, an Environmental Impact
Report and design plans and specs before construction can begin.
Exhibit 16 summarizes these tasks and schedule. The estimated capital
cost of this facility was $130 million as shown in Exhibit 17. Staff is
proceeding on this schedule to implement the Sanitation Districts' water
reclamation policy.
To accomplish the water reclamation portion of its conservation plan,
the Sanitation Districts has added another full-time professional staff
member. The key responsibilities of this person include:
• Coordinate with city, county and state agencies;
• Develop industrial, municipal and commercial markets for reclaimed
water;
• Develop public information and education programs to gain acceptance
of reclaimed water use;
• Construct and operate up to three new water reclamation plants in
cooperation with OCWD; and,
• Monitor and coordinate with federal, state and regional regulators
responsible for water reclamation;
F. Summary
In summary, the Sanitation Districts has an established and active water
conservation program focused on industrial, commercial and institutional
conservation plus a community education program for water conservation.
The Sanitation Districts is undertaking new water conservation
initiatives in the areas of industrial, commercial and institutional
water conservation, residential water conservation and water
reclamation. In support of these measures, two new professional staff
have been hired.
\/ CCN:hc
Ref. 030051.rp -7-
EXHIBIT 16
CRESCENT BASIN WATER RECLAMATION PLANT
PROTECT IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
Time Schedule, Months
Total
Calendar
Time to Months to
Task Complete Task Start Complete
A. Site Agreement 12 0 12
B. Reclaimed Water System Study 12 6 18
C. Injection Studies 12 6 18
D. Treatment System Study 12 6 18
E. Geologic Study 12 6 18
F. SCAQMD Health Effects Study 12 6 18
G. Environmental Impact Report 18 12 30
H. Prepare Plans & Specifications 18 24 42
I. Obtain Permits 24 18 42
J. Construction 30 44 74
EXHIBIT 17
COST ANALYSIS
CRESCENT BASIN WATER RECLAMAT70N PLANT
Capital O&M Annual Cost(a)
Cost Cat
Element (S1.0001 ($1.000/YPI (S1.000/YR) S/acre-foot
Treatment
Primary and Secondary $61,960 S1,500 S 7,000 S250
Advanced(b) 40,920 6.700 10.300 w
Subtotal 102,880 8,200 17,300 665
Development Cats(c) 10,950 0 890 0
Water Reuse Facilities
Groundwater Injection and
Irrigation Conveyance 1G.444Q 1.770
Subtotal 26,950 350 2,660 75
Total Facilities
(Including Reclamation) $129,830 SM50 S19,960 $740
Reclamation Portion Only(d) S56,920 S7,050 M070 S490
(a) Capital recovery at 8% per year, plus O&M costs; does not include land cats.
(b) Additional costs for reclamation greater than projected secondary treatment costs.
(c) Includes industrial waste diversions, trunk sewer diversions, sludge/brine return, site development costs,
and flood control improvements.
(d) Allocated portion of total facilities necessary to meet Title 22 reclamation requirements. Includes
advanced treatment and water reuse facilities but does not include primary/secondary treatment costs
necessary for ocean discharge.
.,r
APPENDIX C
WASTE WATER DISPOSAL COMPANY
SITE APPRAISAL LETTER
�I
APPRAISAL:
1321 S. STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD
HASTE WATER DISPOSAL CO. PROPERTY
FULLERTON, CALIFORNIA
Date of Value:
April 1, 1990
_ Prepared for:
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
P.O. BOX 6127
Fountain Valley, California
Attention: Thomas K. Dawes
Director of Engineering
Prepared by:
The Schooler Company
17802 Irvine Boulevard
Suite 131
Tustin, California 92680
(714) '669-1833
PAX (714) 731-3179
THE SCHOOLER COMPANY
Appraisals and Urban Economics
17802 Irvine Boulevard, Suite 131
Tustin, California 92680
(714) 6694833
FAX (714) 731-3179
April 9, 1990
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92728
Attention: Mr. Thomas M. Dawes, Director of Engineering
Dear Mr. Dawes:
As requested, The Schooler Company has made a current fair market appraisal of
the industrial site owned by the Waste Water Disposal Co. located at 1321 S.
State College Boulevard, in the City of Fullerton, California. This appraisal
:a sought in connection with the proposed acquisition of the site, assuming it
to be vacant land only and free of any ground contamination. The following
summary letter report sets forth our findings and data and indicates our opinion
of current fair market value.
GENERAL DATA:
Fair Market Value
As defined in Chapter 1275, Title 7, Part 3 of the California Code of Civil
Procedure, entitled EMINENT DOMAIN LAW, the fair market value of the
property taken is the highest price on the date of valuation that would be
agreed to by a seller, being willing to sell but under no particular or
urgent necessity for so doing, nor obliged to sell, and a buyer, being
ready, willing and able to buy under no particular necessity for so doing,
each dealing with the other with full knowledge of all the uses and
purposes for which the property is reasonably adaptable and available.
Property Rights Valued
The property rights valued herein are the fee simple estate of the entire
land parcel.
Function of the Valuation
It is the function of this appraisal to provide the County Sanitation
Districts with a current estimate of fair market value for the subject
property, as if vacant and free of any ground contamination, relative to
proposed acquisition of the entire site.
Date of Value
The date on which this valuation is predicated is April 1, 1990.
Market Data Summary
Industrial Acreage Sales
Fullerton and North Orange County
Sale Sales Price:
Item Date Location Site sf/ac. Zoning T000 Iour. Total Psf
A 12/89 S/s Fender Ave., 75,010+ MG Level None $681,500 $9.09
a/c State College 1.72+ - onslte
Fullerton
B 4/89 W/s Richfield Rd. , 291,977+ MO Level None $3,370,300 511.96
n/o Is Palma 6.47+ onslte
Placentia
C 3/89 E/s Allec St., 100,144+ GI Level, None 51,300,000 $12.38
n/o Cerritos Ave. 2.3+ cnsite
Anaheim
D 3/89 W/o Batavia St., 130,558+ ML Level Older $1,566,700 $12.30
n/o Grove Ave. 3.0+ metal
Orange bldgs.
E 12/88 W/s Levis St., 260,369+ GI Level None $3,261,000 $12.52
s/o Ball Rd. 5.98+
Anaheim
F 12/88 W/s Ravmond Ave. , 812,830+ ML Level Older 58,340,000 $10.26
a/c Orangethor?e 18.66+ indus.
Anaheim 61das.
G 10/88 N/s Columbia, 277,477+ M1 Level None 32,497,500 $9.00
w/o Berry St. 6.37+
Brea
R 8/88 SEC Valencia a 322,867+ MP Level None $3,050,500 $9.45
Sally Place 7.41+
Fullerton
r�
T
Mr. Thomas M. Dawes -2- April 9, 1990
%M/
Highest and Best Use
Highest and best use 1s defined as that reasonable and probable use that
supports the highest present value, as vacant land or improved property, as
defined, as of the effective date of the appraisal. Alternatively, the
reasonably probable and legal use of land or sites as though vacant, found
to be physically possible, appropriately supported, financially feasible
and that results in highest present land value. (See following 'Subject
Property' discussion. )
Principle of Substitution -
This economics principle states that a prudent purchaser will pay no more
to acquire one property than he need pay to acquire an equally-desirable
substitute property on the open. market. This common sense concept is the
underlying rationale for forming a value opinion for one property based on
the known sales prices, improvement costs and/or income streams for
comparable properties, and as such is inherent in each of the three
traditional valuation approaches.
Sales Comparison Approach
This approach to valuation is the only approach used in this appraisal to
indicate the value of the site as if vacant. in the Sales Comparison
Approach, recent sales of similar properties are researched and then
compared to the subject in order to identify and adjust for dissimilarities
in size, location, utility, market conditions at and subsequent to sale
data, and extraordinary influences. This approach is, of course, impacted
by the availability, completeness and comparability of sale date discovered
through the market data search.
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
The City of Fullerton
Fullerton is located in northern Orange County, bounded by the Cities of
Buena Park, La Habra, Brea, Placentia and Anaheim. Primary surface access
is by way of I-5, State Highways 91 and 57; both rail and airport (private)
access are also available.
The City is a mature community, evidencing the full range of public and
private facilities. Existing uses are primarily residential, with strong
commercial and industrial components as well as cultural sources and
educational institutions headed by the California State University,
Fullerton, the Southern College of Optometry .and Fullerton College.
�O
Mr. Thomas M. Dawes -3- April 9, 1990
Subject Neighborhood -
The subject is located along a primary commercial thoroughfare (State
College Boulevard) 1/4 mile north of the 91 Freeway and 1/2 mile west of
the 57 Freeway, in the southeastern corner of the City, just 70+ feet north
of the Anaheim boundary. The area is characterized by a mix of industrial
uses (primarily In Fullerton) and commercial/retail uses (primarily In
Anaheim). . Surrounding uses include: -U.S. Rentals', 'Fullerton Medical
Center', self-storage facilities and multi-tenant retail uses.
Current zoning on the subject site is 'MG, General Industrial'; the General
Plan designation for this area is 'Industrial'.
Subject Prooerty
The subject property, for. purposes of this appraisal, is assumed to be a
graded, vacant 5.74± acre site, absent any on-site improvements and free of
any sub-soil contamination. (The existing improvements, as directed, have _
not been taken into consideration in this appraisal.)
The subject is identified as Orange County APN 073-2.31-12, with a street
address of 1321 S. State College Boulevard, Fullerton. Current assessed.
values are: $287,566 (land), $134,617 ( improvements), totalling $421,983
(based on a 1974 purchase date) . The owner apparent is Waste Water
Disposal Co. ; their contact person is Mr. Scott Temple, (714) 525-4373.
The site has unrestricted legal access to State College Boulevard; offsite
improvements include asphalt street paving, concrete curbs, gutters and
si6ewalks, and street lighting. All standard utilities are in and
operating on-site.
Eighest and best use for the subject site, considered as if vacant, is
indicated to be industrial-use development, of a type that would be
consistent with market demand and optimize the site's freeway proximity and
major-thoroughfare frontage. '
VALUATION:
The subject was compared and contrasted with the industrial land sales
summarized on the facing page. These sales were derived from a data search
that started in the City of Fullerton and expanded to include Anaheim,
Buena Park, Placentia, Brea, La Habra and Orange. The broad scope of the
search was needed because very few vacant industrial acreage sites exist in
the highly-developed North Orange County area.
n
Mr. Thomas M. Dawes -4- April 9, 1990
�1
Adjustments were made to the reported sales price for each property in
order to eliminate from consideration the significant differences between
the sale properties and the subject property. The comparable sales range
In date from December, 1989 back to August, 1988; accordingly, each of the
sales prices was adjusted somewhat upward to reflect the overall upward
trend in industrial land prices.
Items C, D, E and F were adjusted downward for their overall superior
location. Items A, B, C, E and G were adjusted upward for their frontage
on secondary thoroughfares; Item E was adjusted downward for its superior
corner location features such as access and high visibility. Items D and F
were adjusted upward to include the demolition cost for existing, older
on-site improvements. Overall, Item A is considered most comparable to the
subject, primarily lacking the major-thoroughfare frontage and a portion of
the proximity to freeways.
After all adjustments were made, the indicated current fair market value
for the subject property, as if vacant and as if. free from any ground
contamination, is
THREE MILLION DOLLARS
$3,000,000; equates to $12.00± psf of land area
Your attention is directed to the statements of 'Limiting Conditions' and
'Certification by Appraiser' will follow and which form an integral part of this
report.
We have retained in our files a complete copy of this letter report as well as
supporting documents such as field notes, maps and photographs. If you need any
further information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide appraisal services to the County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County.
Yours truly,
THE SCHOOLER COMPANY '
Diane�D. Schooler
President
DDS:pw
RE: AGENDA ITEM NO, 15 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
May 23, 1990 1° E115 AVEWE
no SO.ell)
EW W..VGLLFY GLIMAWA 927289127
O1a,952.Nn
REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE/FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEES
Meeting Date: May 23, 199o - 5: 0 p.m.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE:
Present: Present:
Buck Catlin Joint Chairman William Mahoney, Chairman
William Mahoney Vice Joint Chairman Don R. Griffin
Don R. Griffin Past Joint Chairman James Neal
Richard B. Edgar Past Joint Chairman Peer Swan
James Wahner Chairman, District 1 James Wahner
Iry Pickler Chairman, District 2
Richard Polls Chairman, District 3 Absent:
Evelyn Hart Chairman, District 5
Ruthelyn Plummer Chairman, District 6 Wayne Silzel
Don E. Smith Chairman, District 7/Past JC Wayne Wedin
Grace Winchell Chairman, District 11
Hank Wedaa Chairman, District 13
Peer A. Swan Chairman, District 14 STAFF PRESENT:
Don Roth County Supervisor
J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
Absent: Blake Anderson, Dir. Technical Svcs.
Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering
Norman E. Culver Past Joint Chairman Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Roger Stanton County Supervisor Ed Hodges, Sr. Facilities Manager,
Maintenance
Bob Ooten, Assistant Superintendent,
OTHERS PRESENT: Operations
Rich von Langen, Source Control Mgr.
Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
1) Fiscal Policy Committee Recommendations re 1990-91 Joint Works Budgets.
Fiscal Policy Chairman Mahoney reported that the Committee had met several
times over the past few months to consider the 1990-91 Joint Works Budgets. He
reviewed the enclosed booklet containing the following budgetary recommendations:
A. Personnel Recommendations (blue): Fifty-five new positions are
recommended to provide staffing to operate and maintain the facilities
required by major treatment plant expansion and to support related
activities and new program implementation to comply with changing
regulatory requirements. Many of these positions will not be filled
(1 of 6)
Executive/Fiscal Policy
Committees' Report
May 23, 1990
until later in the year, and some may not be filled at all if
completion of construction projects is delayed. The recommended
positions are in support of a variety of programs as detailed in the
budget and summarized below:
Summary of Proposed Additional Staffing
Program/System Position
Management
Board Secretary 8 Management Support 2
Personnel 1
Finance
Accounting <1>
Information Services 5
Operations and Maintenance
Sewage Collection Systems 4
General Plant and Equipment Maintenance it
Treatment Plant Operations/Training 8
Technical Services
Regulatory Compliance (Air, Land, Water) 2
Source Control Program 7
Process Monitoring and Laboratory 5
Engineering
Facilities Planning and Design 5
Construction Management 6
Total 55
The recommended new positions will raise the authorized staffing level
from 571 to 626 at an added maximum annual salary cost of $1,960,630.
Employee benefits add approximately 30% to the salary costs.
B. Joint Operating Fund (green): The net cost of administering the Joint
Districts' activities and operating and maintaining the Joint
Treatment Works for 1990-91 is estimated at $50.2 million. Revenues
and other offsets in the amount of $2.6 million will reduce the net
Joint Operations requirements to $47.6 million, up 6.9% from the
1989-90 budget. Of this, 3.0% (a little less than half) of the
increase is due to inflation and plant expansion, and 3.9% (a little
more half) is the result of regulatory mandates.
(2 of 6)
Executive/Fiscal Policy
Committees' Report
May 23, 1990
C. Self-Funded Insurances: Included in the Joint Operating Budget, the
following self-funde insurance budgets are consistent with the
Boards' past actions relative to these plans:
1. Workers' Compensation (pink)
2. Self-Funded Health Plan (goldenrod)
3. Liability (salmon)
D. CORF Joint Works Construction (yellow): The CORF budget sets forth a
�103.4 million treatment plant construction program for 1990-91 in
accordance with the 30-year Master Plan adopted by the Boards last
year.
Recommendation
The Committees recommend approval of the proposed 1990-91 personnel
requirements and Joint Works Operating and Construction Budgets.
2) Authorizing Fiscal Policy Comm ttee to Place Districts' 1990-91 Workers'
ompensation Excess Insurance coverage.
The Districts' Workers' Compensation Excess Coverage insurance policy
expires on July 1, 1990. The Districts' present policy for statutory workers'
compensation coverage (unlimited benefits) with an annual self-insured retention
level of $250,000 carries an annual premium of $31,835.
Because of the way the insurance marketplace works, the Districts' broker
has advised that he may not have quotations for the 1990-91 coverage in time for
consideration by the Boards at the regular June meeting. Inasmuch as the
current coverage will expire between the Boards' June 13th and July llth regular
meetings, staff recommended that the Fiscal Policy Committee be authorized and
directed to evaluate proposals obtained by the Districts' insurance broker and
place appropriate excess workers' compensation coverage effective July 1, 1990;
and that the actions taken by the Fiscal Policy Committee be submitted to the
Joint Boards for ratification or revision at the regular meeting on July llth.
This is similar to the procedure followed by the Boards in past years.
Recommendation: The Committees concur with the staff's recommendation to
authorize the Fiscal Policy Committee to place the Workers' Compensation excess
coverage insurance effective July 1, 1990, subject to ratification by the Boards.
3) Air Quality Issues.
A. SCAQMD Clean Air Award to Districts
Joint Chairman Catlin recognized Chairman Wedaa who described a Clean
Air Awards Program that he was instrumental in establishing last year
at the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The
program recognizes organizations and individuals that have made
significant contributions to reducing air pollution.
(3 of 6)
Executive/Fiscal Policy
Committees' Report
May 23, 1990
v
Chairman Wedaa stated that he was pleased to inform the Directors that
the Sanitation Districts will be the recipient of a 1990 Clean Air
Award in the category of Model Community Achievements to be presented
on June 7th. He noted that all Board members received a copy of the
Districts' clean air achievements submittal in April.
B. Air Quality Issues Update Report
The staff reviewed and the Directors discussed at considerable length
the enclosed Air Quality Issues Update Report summarizing the current
status of several major Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) issues that
affect the Districts.
C. Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for Air
Treatment Optimization Study
The enclosed Air Quality Issues Update Staff Report includes a
recommendation to engage John Carollo Engineers to perform a foul air
treatment optimization study at a cost not to exceed $85,000. The
study would make recommendations for changes in the SCAQMD operating
permit conditions to clarify ambiguous language, and system enhancement
for operational effectiveness and efficiencies.
The Directors discussed at some length the need to conduct the study,
alternatives, including the respective responsibilities of the
Districts and SCAQMD, and the cost of such studies during which staff
reported that they expect to realize reduced annual operating costs
from operational refinements that will result from the study that will
more than offset its cost.
Recommendation: The Committees recommend approval of a professional
services agreement with John Carollo Engineers to perform a foul air
treatment study for an amount not to exceed $85,000.
Directors Polis, Roth, Smith and Wahner requested that their opposition
to conducting the study at Districts' expense be made a matter of
record.
4) Revisions to Management Vehicle Policy.
A proposal to revise the Districts' Management Vehicle Policy was referred
to the Fiscal Policy Committee to study and report back to the Executive
Commi ttee.
5) Status Report on Industrial Waste Enforcement Actions.
The General Counsel provided the Committee with the following update on the
status of industrial waste enforcement actions.
(4 of 6)
Executive/Fiscal Policy
Committees' Report
May 23, 1990
A. Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson vs. CSD. The General Counsel reported that both
sides had undertaken discovery in furtherance of preparing the case for
final hearing, the discovery being in the form of reviewing records of
both the permittee and of the District. The General Counsel also noted
that there was a mandatory settlement conference scheduled for June 6,
1990, and a hearing on the District's motions for denial of the writ of
mandate and for summary judgment on the Plaintiff's cause of action for
inverse condemnation. The motions will be heard on June 14, 1990.
The General Counsel then reviewed the aspects of the pending motions and
the settlement conference, and after a brief discussion, direction was
provided to Mr. Woodruff as to proceeding.
B. Universal Circuits (UCI) vs. CSD.
1. Liti ation re Permit at ExistingFacility, 1800 Newport Circle,
anta Ana, alITornia.
The General Counsel reported that the judgment had been signed by
Judge Weeks and notice of the entry of judgment served on UCI.
The previously-issued stay order which allows Universal Circuits
to continue to discharge remains in effect pursuant to the terms
of the judgment until such time as UCI files an appeal or the
statutory time in which to do so has expired. Counsel reported
that no indication of filing the appeal was forthcoming and that
UCI was under the impression that they would be unable to continue
discharging from the existing facility.
After a brief discussion, counsel was instructed by the Committee
to oppose any further application for stay order by UCI, and staff
was reauthorized to reorder the termination of all discharges from
the existing facility when legally permitted to do so.
2. New Facility at 2249 South Yale Street, Santa Ana, California.
The General Counsel reported that the General Manager had denied
the application for a permit for UCI's new facility and that this
was the time for the Executive Committee to schedule a hearing
based upon the appeal of UCI dated May 25, 1990, and received by
the District the same date.
The Committee then established July 12, 1990 at 6:00 p.m. as the
date and time for the hearing of the appeal . Staff and counsel are
to give notice to UCl/Appellant, in accordance with the Districts'
adopted Rules of Procedure for Appeals.
3. CSD vs. UCI re Action to Collect Penalties.
The General Counsel reported that this action filed by the District
to recover penalties for the illegal discharges from UCI 's Newport
Circle facility was not entitled to priority and was simply
proceeding in the ordinary course of actions in the Superior Court.
(5 of 6)
Executive/Fiscal Policy
Committees' Report
May 23, 1990
The General Counsel further noted that there have been some nominal
attempts to discuss a comprehensive settlement of the old facility
(Newport Circle) permit, new facility (South Yale Street) permit,
and the recovery of penalties, but that to date no meaningful offer
of settlement had been received from UCI with regards to the
principal subjects of interest to the District.
After considerable discussion, the General Counsel was given
direction as to the outline of any possible settlement that would
be proposed by UCI and would be considered for acceptance by the
District.
JWS:sc
Encl.
(6 of 6) .
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
0 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
May 16, 1990
109Gt ELLIB 4VENNE
F.O.WX 9127
FWNTMN VAIEV.CALWORNIA SM9412I
n1M962.4n
STAFF REPORT
AIR OOAl= ISSUES UPDATE
1. ISSUES RE SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MAIMMIENr DISTRCCr
Most of the Districts' construction and operational activities are
subject to review and regulation by the South Coast Air Quality Management
District (SCAM). The evolution of SCROM new rules and amendments to existing
rules is continuous, resulting in ever-tightening limits imposed on the
Districts' operations. The 1989 Air Quality Management Plan, the federal Clean
Air Act, the California Clean Air Act and political and public opinion forces
will result in new requina9wnts that may have significant impact on the
Districts. our ability to construct and operate new wastewater treatment
facilities to meet service demands and more stringent water quality limitations
my be severely restricted.
In the last few months, the Districts' staff has had extensive
involvement with the SCAUM on several proposed amendments to existing rules,
and on operational disputes on the Districts' odor facilities. The following
is a brief explanation of some of the issues. Action is requested on Item A.
The reining items are informational only at this time.
A. operation of Odor Control Facilities
The Districts have completed the installation of foul air collection
and deodorizing facilities at both treatment plants. Foul air is
collected from influent trunk sewers, headworks, primary collection
facilities and sludge dewatering facilities, and deodorized in 30 faul
air scrubbers. The odor control facilities, the largest voluntary odor
control retrofit in the United States, were built under several separate
permits to construct (PTCs), each with numerous conditions issued by
SCAM.
These permits overlap with other general treatment plant permits and,
as a result, the conditions have become somewhat confusing, particularly
for SCAQMD inspectors. On April 16 and 19, the Enforcement Division of
SCACpm issued Notices of Violation (NOV) for the Fountain Valley
treatment plant facilities, citing Condition No. 4, which reads w
follows:
"This equipment must not be operated unless it is vented to air
pollution control systems which are in full use and which have been
issued permits to construct by Executive Officer."
-1-
The Districts were operating four of the odor control scrubbers at
the time. Based on operational and compL:ance experience, we had found
that this number of scrubbers was sufficient. SCAUAD Enforcement
Division interpreted the permit condition to mean that all ten scrubbers
had to be operated.
The Districts' original engineering design data for the scrubbers
that we submitted in support of the SCAQMD permit application was based
on influent air q,am;ty assumptions which have been found today to be
extremely conservative. The amber of scrubbers identified in the permit
was based on this conservative estimate. But actual operating conditions
have been far less severe than anticipated. Accordingly, the Districts
have operated only the number of scrubbers necessary to meet the
discharge concentrations allowed in the permit and the Districts have
never violated discharge requirements. The Notices of Violation were
issued because all scrubbers were riot operating. The Enforcement
Division, even after consultation with our staff and General Counsel,
issued the NOVs believing that all scrubbers should be operated.
The Districts immediately put all scrubbers on line, which not only
resulted in excess operating costs, but SCAQ,+ff1 had to be called to
request an emergency operating variance under SCAQM breakdown procedure
for routine maintenance of the scrubbers. However, after meeting with
Districts' engineering and legal staff, SMM has now allowed the
Districts to resume the normal operating pattern,. i.e. operating only
those scrubbers necessary to meet discharge requirements.
This incident has pointed out that the operating conditions need to
be better understood and clarified so that the Districts and the SCACM
Enforcement Division no longer have misunderstandings, gar this reason,
staff is proposing to hire John Carrillo Engineers to perform a Foul Air
Treatment Optimization Study. The work would have two objectives.
First, the study would review existing permit conditions and make
recca++endations for changes in both operating and discharge conditions.
These recmmendations will be reviewed by the Districts and submitted to
SCA= for its consideration in drafting amended operating permit
condition language. Second, because the Districts have experienced
certain types of odors which are not being sufficiently reduced by the
scrubbers, the scrape of work will include a study of existing scrubber
performance. (The scrubbers treat hydrogens sulfides, but other
odor-producing compounds appear to be insufficiently removed by the
present air treatment process.) Staff believes that modifying operation
of the scrubbers to take into account climate conditions and possibly
raising stack heights may reduce the potential for complaints from these
odors.
Based on the knowledge gained to date in the operation of the odor
control facilities, the fine-tmu'ing requested has pote� for lowering
Districts' operating costs, further reducing odor emissions and
eliminating problems in condition interpretation with the SCAUD. The
final report world make operating and discharge condition recommendations
which would be subsequently submitted to the MVID by the Districts.
-2-
Carollo has worked on marry of the systems and can begin work
immediately on the necessary studies. Staff is requesting that the
v Executive Committee recce end approval of a professional services
agreement with John Carrillo Engineers to undertake the studies noted
above. The cost is estimated as follows:
Professional Services,
(hourly rates including
labor plus overhead at
155%), not to exceed $65,000.00
Direct Expenses,
not to exceed 3,000.00
a bcons„1tants,
not to exceed 10,000.00
Fixed Profit 7,000.00
ESTDOM D 1OML, not to exceed $85,000.00
B. Revision to SCAQMD Rule 431.1: Sulfur in Gaseous Ebel
On May 4, 1990 SCAOM amended Rule 431.1 which regulates the sulfur
content of gaseous fuels burned in the air basin including the Districts'
digester gas. The existing rule limits digester gas sulfur content to
800 parts per million (ppm) and 250 ppm if the gas is sold. Presently,
the Districts are operating under permits to operate issued by SCACM
Which limit the hydrogen sulfide in our digester gas to 100 ppm. Rule
431.1 will require the Districts to comply with a limit of 40 ppm total
sulfur beginning May 4, 1992. In order to meet the requiremerit of 40
ppm, additional digester chemicals and/or gas scrubbing equipment will be
required. There are several potential methods to reduce the level of
sulfides in the gas, and a selection will be made based on system
reliability, a pez: ence in operating such a unit and enonariic evaluation.
As the Districts provided in written and oral testimorry to SC.AQM staff
and its Board, the ability to consistently achieve 40 ppm is presently -
poorly understood. Control technology and cost information will be
developed by staff.
C. New Source Review
The SCACMD is proposing amendments to Regulation.XIII, New Source
Review, which could have serious implications for the Districts.
Pdoption is presently scheduled for June 22, 1990. Within the
requirements for obtaining a permit to construct is a requirement to
offset air emissions resulting from the project. The Districts'
long-term position has been that PO1Ws should not be subject to the
offset req=ement, since they are non-elective public services which
must be constructed in the air basin.
Under the proposed amendments to Regulation XIII, all new emissions
must be offset and the existing purchased and banked emission credit
-3-
program will be replaced with a "Community Bank" administered by SCACPM.
The Community Bank proposal includes a "Priority Reserve" of emission
reduction credits for essential public services that includes sewage
treatment plants and landfills. The SCAM is assuming that the Priority
Reserve system will contain sufficient offset credits to allow essential
public services to construct new facilities. However, the SCAQMD staff
report and supporting environmental analysis do not provide a technical
analysis that would form a basis for this assertion. In point of fact,
the Community Bank and its subset, the Priority Reserve, depend upon the
year-by-year attainment of basin-wide emission reductions. In the event
that basin-wide objectives are not achieved, the Community Bank will be
reduced accordingly. Therefore, the various wastewater agencies,
landfills and other critical public services will be vying for a limited
offset hank. Carried to its logical, worst-case scenario, the Districts
would not be able to construct new facilities because of insufficient
Priority Reserve offset credits. In the absence of the ability to
construct new facilities, the Districts, the Regional Water Quality
Control Board or EPA would eventually be placed in the position of having
to limit future sewer connections.
The Districts may be in a better position than most other POTWs
because of the purchased emission credits we now hold in reserve. While
these purchased emissions will be discounted under proposed Regulation
XIII, there would still be a bank available to at least meet our
short-term needs.
We, along with.our sister POFIWs, are continuing to work with SCAQM
to attempt to either exempt PO1Ws or develop final rule language that
will enable necessary Wastewater treatment facilities to be constructed.
D. Proposed Rule 1110.2. Electrification of Stationary Internal
Canbustion Enoines
This proposed rule covers all stationary combustion engines over 50
horsepower. The rule will reduce the permit condition of oxides of
nitrogen (MX), carbon monoxide (CO) and reactive organic gases (ROG) for
sewage digester fueled engines (most other engines must be converted to
electric motors). The reductions are substantial. Limits proposed by
SCAUM are less than the limits contained in the permit to construct
conditions for the Central Power Generation Systems. The Directors will
recall that the new engines now being delivered are state-of-the-art
design, and if this rule is adopted the Districts will have to further
reduce the emissions from these engines at considerable expense in either
engine efficiency or by the installation of catalytic converters. At the
meeting staff will brief the Directors on the implications of this rule.
E. Conformity with Air Quality Management Plan
The 1989 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) is functioning as this
region's implementation plan to achieve the requirements of the federal
Clean Air Act. All activities in the basin that require permits issued
by the federal goverment (or an agency delegated authority by the
federal government) mist conform to the AQMP. This means that our ocean
discharge permit which is issued by the federal EPA and the California
-4-
For the Districts, there are, two tests of conformity. First, our
facilities most be constructed in a stair-step manner that coincides with
the population projections adopted by the Southern California Association
of Governments. The second test of conformity for the Districts is that
the cities and the County which we serve conform to the Ate. In the
event all cities do not conform, then a mitigation plan created by the
Districts, SCAG, SCAQMD and the affected local governments nest be
approved by EPA and adopted by the Regional Water Quality Control Board
in our next discharge permit.
The Districts are in conformity with the first test. The thirty-year
master plan which we completed last year is, in fact, a model of the
concept of pacing new wastewater treatment facilities with the projected
population figures of SCAG. However, the second test of conformity is
far more difficult to achieve. At the present time, very few, if any, of
the cities in Orange County have achieved conformity with the PAN.
Their general plans have not been amended to include air quality
elements, and most have not adopted the traffic control and parking
access measures identified in the ACM. Therefore, at least in the short
term, the Districts will not be in conformity with the second test, and
permits to construct issued by the SCAUM and a issuance of a new N=
permit cannot occur. A mitigation plan will necessarily have to be
created in the short term to address our conformity requirements.
Districts' staff have been in contact with several groups that are
now attempting to coordinate Orange County local goverment conformity
with the AQMP. Representatives of the Orange County City/County
Coordination Committee, the SCRUM, SCAG and the Orange County League of
Cities have been involved in this effort to some degree. A workshop was
held May 3 in Santa Ana by the Orange County City/County Coordination
Committee to provide an overview of the sub-regional responsibilities of
local government in Orange County. Staff members of the above-named
organizations, as well as members of the planning departments of several
Orange County cities, agree that a far more detailed "nuts and bolts"
approach needs to be provided to local government. For this reason, the
Districts' staff, working in either a lead or support role, will involve
themselves with these other organizations to provide the workshops
necessary to advance local goverment conformity so that the Districts'
long-teem master plan objectives will not be delayed.
F. Proposed SCAW Rule 1401: Air Toxics
SCAW has announced that the long-awaited Rule 1401 is scheduled for
an adoption hearing on Thursday, May 17. Districts' staff have
been involved in the evolution of this rule for more than two years.
While the results of the hearing are not known at the time of the writing
of this staff report, it is anticipated that Rule 1401 will be adopted as
it is now proposed.
The rule will require that best available control technology for air
toxics be constructed for any new facilities that increase the
theoretical risk of cancer to the most exposed individual to greater than
one in a million. Compliance would be required in May 1995 for any of
the Districts' new construction projects that receive a permit to
-5-
construct after May 1990. The rule will allow new projects to be
retrofitted with todca control technology after it is developed. -
Districts' staff believe that SCAQMD's agreement to allow retrofitting is
a major and important Concession and demonstrates they acknowledge our
water quality protection concerns. The five-year delay for caffp1iance
will be very helpful to the Districts in trying to achieve conformity
with the air tovics control regulations. However, as discussed below,
the time schedule will be very tight. At the present time there is no
known technology to control air taxies at POTWs. The Districts and other
PCTWs in Southern California will be working in regional and national
cooperative studies to develop the necessary technology.
2, FREMIAL CLEAN AM ACr AM MMENrS OF 1990
In addition to the requirements now imposed by the SCACM, new
requirements are being proposed and the provisions of the amended federal
Clean Air Act. Most observers agree that the Clean Air Act will be successfully
adopted during this session of Congress.
For the Districts, requirements for the control of volatile organic
compounds (6VCs) from our exi and new wastewater treatment processes is a
likely outcome. POiWs which .ixasase the theoretical risk of cancer for the
mast exposed individual to a risk greater than one in a million will be requi.red
to provide control technology to reduce the risk to less than one in a million.
Mae present language of the Senate version of the Clean Air Act will require
control measures that cold include source control, material subsUtutimh,
product bans, changes an operational procedures and the addition of in-plant
control technology.
Working closely with representatives of the California Association of
Sanitation Agencies and the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, the
Districts' staff have been instrumental in ensuring that PO1Ws have sufficient
time to develop control technology prior to requirements going into effect. As
presently written, the Senate version would require that regulations be
promulgated by EPA five years after adoption of the Clean Air Act amendments and
PMWs would be required to achieve the regulations three years after that.
With a total of only eight years to develop, design, construct and start
up facilities, these requirements of the Clean Air Act will be
technology-faroing and will require a great deal of research effort. Districts'
staff have not with key representatives with EPA (as recently as May 14) to
encourage EPA to participate in and fund cooperative R&D studies with key PO1Ws
so that the technology can be developed in a timely, econamac and coordinated
national effort.
Staff will further brief the Directors on the implications of these issues at
the Executive Committee meeting.
-6-
SCAQMD RULES/PLANS IMPACTING CSDOC
• RULE 431 .1 : SULFUR IN GASEOUS FUEL
• REG. XIII: NEW SOURCE REVIEW
• RULE 1110.2: INTERNAL COMBUSTION
ENGINES
• AQMP: CONFORMITY
REQUIREMENTS
• RULE 1401 : AIR TOXICS
RULE 431 .1 : SULFUR IN GASEOUS FUEL
AMENDED: MAY 45 1990
COMPLIANCE: MAY 4, 1992
• CONSIDERABLE CSDOC COMMENTS
• CSDOC PRODUCES 4,000,000 CFD
• 40 PPM TOTAL SULFUR
• CONTIN. MONITORING (OR EQUIVALENT)
• CSDOC LIMIT NOW 100 PPM T.S.
• CSDOC PRE-1985 3000 PPM T.S.
• CSDOC NOW 45-90 PPM T.S.
• FUTURE TECHNOLOGY = ?
• FUTURE MONITORING = ?
• FUTURE $ _ ?
• CSDOC R&D BEING PLANNED
REGULATION XIII : NEW SOURCE REVIEW
`AMENDMENT: JUNE 28, 1990
COMPLIANCE: 3 MONTHS LATER
• ONGOING DIALOGUE WITH SCAQMD
• NINE RULES UNDER THE REGULATION
• "BACT" AND OFFSETS FOR ALL NEW OR
MODIFIED SOURCES FOR NON-ATTAINMENT
POLLUTANTS
• OFFSET FROM PRIORITY RESERVE OF
COMMUNITY BANK (AFTER USING
EXISTING ERCs)
• CSDOC'S ACCOUNT HAS 520 LBS/DAY ROG
• "CLEAN SLATE" VS. OFFSETS BACK TO 1976
• PROPOSED RULES APPLY TO ERC CALCS
• PORTABLE EQUIPMENT
• EMERGENCY OPERATIONS EXEMPT BUT...
THE "COMMUNITY BANK" OF
REGULATION XIII
• SMALL BUSINESSES
• ESSENTIAL PUBLIC SERVICES
• PRIORITY RESERVE
• REACTIVE ORGANIC GASES (ROGS)
AS AN EXAMPLE:
ANNUAL ALLOCATION
LB DAY
-BASIN-WIDE REDUCTIONS 43100
-USABLE REDUCTIONS 22200
-TO COMMUNITY BANK 18000
(12600)
-TO PRIORITY RESERVE 2000
(1400)
• 60 MGD PRIMARY EMITS 84 LBS/DAY ROG
• CSDOC HAS 520 LBS/DAY ROG IN ACCOUNT
RULE 1110.2: ELECTRIFICATION OF
STATIONARY INTERNAL
COMBUSTION ENGINES
COMPLIANCE DATE: DECEMBER 31 , 1994
• PURPOSE: REPLACE ENGINES WITH
ELECTRIC MOTORS
• EXISTING CSDOC ENGINES TO BE RETIRED
• BUT 8 NEW CENTRAL POWER GENERATION
SYSTEMS AFFECTED
• EXISTING LIMITS: 76 PPM NOX
• PROPOSED: ABOUT 40 PPM NOX
• COST TO COMPLY:
- CAPITAL: UNKNOWN, 5-10 MILLION
- OPERATING : 5-10% EFFICIENCY LOSS
- MONITORING COSTS
AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN:
CONFORMITY REQUIREMENTS -
AQMP ADOPTED: MARCH 1989
HANDBOOKS APPROVED: MARCH & MAY 1990
COMPLIANCE: NOW
• IMPACTS OCEAN DISCHARGE PERMIT
AND PTC/PTO
• TWO TESTS OF CONFORMITY:
-STAGED CONSTRUCTION (NO PROBLEM)
-CONFORMING LOCAL GOV'T (A PROBLEM)
• CONFORMING LOCAL GOV'T MEANS:
- IMPLEMENT LOCAL GOV'T MEASURES
- AMEND GENERAL PLAN
- STAFF-UP TO IMPLEMENT
- SELF REPORT ON PROGRESS
• MITIGATION PLAN IF NON-CONFORMING
• STATUS: VIRTUALLY NO LOCAL GOV'TS
• WORKSHOPS
-CITY/COUNTY COORDINATING COMMITTEE
-LEAGUE OF CITIES
-SCAQ M D
-SCAG
-DISTRICTS
• CONTINUED DISTRICTS INVOLVEMENT
RULE 1401 : AIR TOXICS
UNDER CONSIDERATION: EARLY 1987
NEXT ADOPTION HEARING: JUNE 1990(?)
COMPLIANCE DATE: UNCERTAIN
• 10 COMPOUNDS (TODAY)
• MUST USE BACT IF 1 -IN-A-MILLION RISK
• BACT MUST CONTROL TO 10-IN-A-MILLION
• 5-YEAR DELAY FOR POTWS
• BACT WILL BE TOUGH
- SHORT TIME FRAME
- LARGE AIR VOLUMES
- LOW CONCENTRATIONS
- AIR IS WET AND COOL
• R&D EFFORTS SOON
- COOPERATIVE STUDIES
- REGIONAL, STATE, FEDERAL
_ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF
ORANGE COUNTY
1990-91 JOINT WORKS
_ BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS
OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Njt ►17 TloAt
.Opolitan Or �Js�
a
J a eo
� � w
Siace 1954
_ ''GE CO��
MAY 23, 1990
.e May 23, 1990
MEMORANDUM
To: Board of Directors
From: Executive Committee
Subject: Summary Report and Recommendations re 1990-91 Joint Works
Budgets (Personnel, Joint Operating Fund and Capital
Outlay Revolving Fund)
Recommendation
,. The Executive Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee' s
recommendation to adopt the enclosed 1990-91 Joint Works Personnel,
Operating and Construction Budgets.
Summary Report
The accompanying budget documents provide detailed information
concerning the proposed Joint Works budgets. The following
discussion highlights and summarizes the recommendations for the
three elements of the Joint Works budgets.
Personnel (See Blue Report)
New Positions
Summary: Staff has previously advised the Directors that major
treatment plant expansion underway and new program
implementation to comply with changing regulatory requirements
would require significant staffing increases to operate and
maintain the new facilities and to support related activities
and other required programs.
Over the past five years we have completed and placed into
service $62 .2 million of new plant facilities and equipment. We
currently have $106.5 million in new treatment plant facilities
under construction that will have been completed and placed into
service during the 1989-90 budget year; another $111. 1 million
in treatment plant facilities that will be completed during the
next few years; and $24 .5 million in individual District
facilities under construction. An additional $251.3 million in
treatment facilities and $64.2 million in collection facilities
are being designed and will be constructed and placed into
service over the next several years. The 30-year Action Plan
Master Plan adopted by the Boards last year projects capital
improvements totalling $1 .48 billion (in 1989 dollars ) under
current NPDES permit conditions.
V
Page 2
i
V
This year our various departments requested 72 new positions.
The General Manager has reviewed those requests with the
Department Heads and is recommending 55 new positions for �.
1990-91. Many of these positions will not be filled until later
in the year, and some may not be filled at all in 1990-91 if
completion of construction projects is delayed. Two of the 55
positions are part-time, and four are to replace part-time
positions being deleted.
Summary of Proposed Additional Staffinc �+
Program/System Position
V
Management
Board Secretary 6 Support 2
Personnel 1
Finance
v
Accounting <1>
Information Services 5
Ytl
Operations and Maintenance
Sewage Collection Systems 4
General Plant and Equipment Maintenance 11
Treatment Plant Operations/Training 8
Technical Services
Regulatory Compliance (Air, Land, Water) 2
Source Control Program 7 �.
Process Monitoring and Laboratory 5
Engineering
Y/
Facilities Planning and Design 5
Construction Management 6
Total 55
The proposed new positions would raise the authorized staffing
level from 571 to 626, an increase of approximately 9.6%.
Annual Cost
Based upon the anticipated need to fill the proposed new positions
over the course of the next year, the recommendations would add
$1,960,630 or approximately 9.8%, to the estimated fiscal year
1990-91 salary budget. Employee benefits paid by the Districts
including retirement, health, life, disability, workers' compensation � :
Page 3
and unemployment insurance and uniforms would add approximately
30% to the salary totals.
Management Department
- Board Secretary's Office: A Secretary position is proposed to
provide additional clerical support to the Board Secretary and
to the General Manager on matters pertaining to the Boards of
Directors' activities and official Districts' records.
- Management Support: An Office Aide position is recommended to
-� be transferred from the Accounting Division to place all Office
Aides in the same organizational unit.
.� - Personnel and Safety/Security: An additional Personnel Analyst
is proposed for this division to provide additional office support
on employee matters for the expanding work force.
Finance Department
- Accounting: The Office Aide position is recommended to be
transferred to the Management Support Group to place all Office
Aides in the same organizational unit.
.n - Information Services: This new division has been effective in
reducing our reliance on consultants and is in constant demand
for both hardware and software problem solving and for
implementing new systems. Three Programmer positions are
proposed to provide support for a new maintenance management
system and implementation of a plant process monitoring and
control system at Plant No. 1, and an additional Information
Services Technician III is recommended to provide additional
hardware support. A Senior Graphics .Technician position is
,e proposed to separate the division's secretarial work load from
the expanded graphics and desktop publishing services.
Operations and Maintenance Department
General Superintendent's Office: Reclassification of the
Emergency Preparedness Coordinator to the Senior Engineer level
is proposed to facilitate recruiting a suitable qualified
employee. An additional Engineer with experience in electrical
.., power generation and distribution is proposed for the Central
Power Generation Facilities now under construction. An
Engineering Aide II position is recommended to replace an
.. Engineering Aide I to more properly reflect the expanded duties.
An additional Senior Clerk position is proposed to provide
support for the training section of the Operations Division.
r
s
Page 4
II
6d
- Plant Maintenance: Two Maintenance Field Supervisor positions
are proposed to replace one Senior Foreman position to provide a l
middle manager at each plant to better direct the leadmen and
workers. Two Equipment Operator positions are proposed for
deletion because of increasing use of private contractors in our
off-site sludge reuse program.
- Collection Facilities: Two Collection Facilities Field
Supervisor positions are recommended: one for the trunk sewer
maintenance group and one for the pump station maintenance
group. This change will allow the down rating of two Collection
Facilities Supervisor positions to Foreman positions. An � I
additional Senior Collection Facilities Worker and a Collection
v
Facilities Worker II are proposed to round out existing and new
crews.
it
- Mechanical Maintenance: Four Senior Mechanic, one Equipment
Operator and two Mechanic positions are proposed to cover
expanding work loads from major new facilities.
V
- Electrical Maintenance: One Lead Electrical Technician position
is recommended to replace an electrical Technician I position to J �
provide better work force control and safer working conditions. 'y
- Instrumentation Maintenance: Because of increasingly
sophisticated controls and instruments in all new facilities,
one each additional Instrument Technician II, Instrument
Technician I and Instrument Maintenance Man positions are
proposed.
VI
- Plant Operations: An additional Shift Supervisor position is
proposed to provide additional process control supervision, to
oversee ongoing operational requirements and to assist with
regulatory compliance. A Senior Plant Operator position is
recommended to serve as the coordinator at Plant No. 1 between
major construction contractors and the ongoing treatment plant
operational requirements. Nine Plant Operator positions are
proposed to increase staffing during the non-daytime shifts and
to expand the in-house training and retraining program. Four I
part-time Control Center Clerk positions are proposed to be `+
deleted in favor of an additional full-time Control Center Clerk.
i
Technical Services Department
- Director of Technical Services' Office: A new position, Air L
Quality Manager is recommended to maintain agency wide
coordination and effective responsiveness in a rapidly changing
and growing regulatory arena. II
u
- Compliance: One additional Senior Clerk position is proposed to
provide clerical support to free the professional staff and to
assist the Division's Secretary. y
Page 5
- Laboratory: Four Lab Analyst positions are recommended to free
four higher lever positions that have been bumped down and to
staff the increased sampling program by the Source Control
Division. One Clerk position is proposed to provide needed
clerical support now being supplied by a Lab Helper who will be
,r better utilized.
- Source Control: An Associate Engineer position is proposed for
the Special Projects Section to provide improved liaison and
contract administration and an Assistant Engineer is proposed for
the Permits Section to implement the recently revised industrial
waste ordinance. Title changes are recommended for four
.. positions, changing "Industrial Waste" to "Source Control" to
more properly reflect the nature of the Divisions, work mission.
One Source Control Inspector II and one Source Control Inspector
I positions are proposed to increase the sampling effort. A
Senior Clerk and two Part-Time Assistant positions are proposed
to provide additional clerical support and data entry and to
collect data for the industrial/commercial user fee program.
Engineering Department
- Planning and Design Management: An Engineer position is
proposed to coordinate and review increasingly complex
electrical and instrumentation design and an Associate Engineer
position is proposed to assist in administering the many
concurrent new projects under design and prepare them for
bidding. A Senior Engineering Aide, an Engineering Aide II and
an Engineering Aide I positions are recommended to begin work on
complete computerized composite drawings of the plants and to
assist the professional staff with exhibits and drawings.
Construction Management: An Engineer position is proposed to
provide ongoing project management services now provided by an
s, outside consultant. A Principal Engineering Associate position
is proposed for a new quality assurance and training section.
One Senior Construction Inspector and two Construction Inspector
positions are needed to augment the inspection staff and to
replace temporary employees. One entry level Engineering Aide I
position is proposed to provide support to staff.
.d Proiected Payroll Cost
The full employment payroll estimate is $29.5 million, but we
expect to realize a payroll savings of approximately 10% due to
personnel turnover, delays in filling new positions, tight
control over hiring activities, temporary adjustments in plant
operation schedules and procedures to minimize staffing, and
delays in major construction schedules. Our total payroll cost
is therefore targeted at $26.3 million.
r
Page 6
Ir
V
- Net payroll and benefits, after chargeouts to CORP and the
Districts, account for approximately 38% of the total budgeted
Joint Operating Costs. L�
- The actual payroll savings may be affected by pending
classification studies and the meet-and-confer process this fall v
when the current three-year Memoranda of Understanding expire,
as there are no provisions in the budget for any changes that
might be forthcoming. Any proposed changes will be considered
by the full Board prior to implementation. 'r
Joint Operating Budget - JO (See Green Report) u
The $47.6 million Joint Operating budget finances the operating and
maintenance costs of the joint treatment works and the joint
v
administrative activities.
The major factors that are causing increases in our Joint Works L
operating and maintenance costs include: �r
- Regulatory Reguirements: More stringent air pollution control � I
requirements mandated by the South Coast Air Quality Management r
District (AQMD) for control and reduction of hydrogen sulfide
(B2S) , oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and oxides of sulfur (SOx)
emissions, resulting in higher operational costs to remove v
pollutants from the digester gas produced in our treatment
plants and control emissions from our digester gas fired engines.
Increased costs for engineering, monitoring, enforcement,
outside and in-house laboratory services and special project
activities carried out by the Compliance, Laboratory and Source
Control staffs to comply with the ocean monitoring and it
pretreatment program provisions of our NPDBS permit as well as
our AQMD permit requirements.
r
- Increased costa for use of higher volumes of chemicals such as
ferric chloride and anionic polymer used in our physical/
chemical treatment systems to improve solids removal L
efficiencies as required to maintain compliance with the
discharge limits set forth in our NPDBS permit.
- Sludge Disposal: The closure of the Coyote Canyon landfill with it
no replacement for sludge disposal, as well as increased cost
for hauling and disposal in a private landfill of waste activated
sludge and grit and screenings which the Regional Water Quality :.
Control Board has determined cannot be disposed of at a municipal
landfill; and higher costs for private reuse alternatives to
landfill disposal.
V
- Odor Control: Increased chemical usage for expanded odor
control program including 20 new foul air scrubbers as well as Ij
increases in the unit cost of caustic soda. rr
Page 7
Repairs and Maintenance: Increased maintenance and repair
activities throughout the Districts' expanded and upgraded
treatment facilities.
Comparison with 1989-90 Budget: The accompanying excerpt from
Schedule A of the Joint Operating Budget (Green Report) highlights
the comparisons between the proposed 1990-91 budget and last year's
budget and also summarizes the reasons for the increases (and
decreases) by major budget category.
Increase Over 1989-90 Budget: The $3.1 million increase is 6.9%
over the 1989-90 budget. Of this, 3.9% (or more than 56% of the
d increase) is directly attributable to regulatory mandates such as
improved wastewater treatment and AQMD regulations requiring
significant improvements in control of air emissions, and increased
costs for chemicals, as well as the ocean monitoring, pretreatment
and toxics control requirements set forth in our NPDBS permit. The
remaining portion of the increase, or about 3.0% (43% of the
increase) is due to inflation related increases in the costs of
operating and maintaining expanded facilities and to accommodate
additional flows into our treatment facilities.
Self-Funded Insurance Plans
The Districts have been self insured for several types of coverage
for the past several years as a result of Fiscal Policy Committee
recommendations that were implemented by the Joint Boards of
Directors.
Workers' Compensation and Public Liability
- The Workers' Compensation and Public Liability plans have been
in existence since 1979.
- The savings realized through these self insured plans plus
a, in-lieu premiums deposited and interest earnings on the
reserves in these funds have resulted in a current reserve
level of $2.6 million, compared to the original $500,000
reserve level set by the Boards when the plans were
established. The Committee recommends that the reserve level
proposed for 1990-91 for the Workers' Compensation fund and
the fully self-insured Public Liability Fund be maintained at
.. the current levels.
- An appropriation of $155,000 for in-lieu premium contributions
by the Districts is recommended in the Workers' Compensation
Fund to maintain the existing reserve level at $696,000.
- A $265,000 appropriation has been included in the Public
Liability Fund for excess loss insurance in the event the
availability of this coverage makes it desirable to the
Directors.
r
i ,
Page 8 4
1 !
Ir
- The Fiscal Policy Committee is again recommending that the
Boards of the individual Districts continue the practice of
setting aside reserve funds to partially cover deductible it
levels for the Districts' all-risk property insurance
coverage. The reserves are recommended to be maintained at
the $5 million level for 1990-91. 1 '
v
Health Plan
- The self-funded Employee Health Plan has also been in `+
existence since 1979. Our claims experience in 1989-90
appears to indicate that the cost containment provisions
enacted in 1984, which include both increased deductible L
requirements and co-payment levels, have been somewhat
effective in helping to stabilize our claims levels on a
per-employee basis. Although total costs have increased in
response to continuing increases in the total numbers of v
active employees, their dependents, and retired employees
participating in the plan, the cost per employee covered has
decreased. W
- These increased total medical care costs required transfers 1 ,
into this fund during the past year over and above the y
anticipated premiums. However, we have partially recovered
some of these expenditures from increased premiums paid by ,
employees for family coverage. Staff expects that the
increased Districts' and employees' contribution level
authorized by the Boards during approval of the salary and
benefits agreements negotiated with the employee groups in � I
1987-88 will also reduce any required transfers in 1990-91. W
We expect these changes, and new cost containment provisions
that are also included, will enable this fund to be more
nearly self supporting by the end of the three year MOU period. {r
Budgeted District premiums are equal to premiums approved for
the HMO plans. 11
- During 1989-90 the Directors opted to purchase both short and
long-term disability insurance and thus no budget has been
allocated for these claims. Premiums are budgeted in the
Joint Operating Fund. V
CORP Budget (See Yellow Report)
u
The $103.4 million Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF) Budget
finances the construction of the Joint Treatment Works Facilities.
It includes major and minor projects which have generally been I '
previously presented to the Boards for review as part of the Master
Plan and/or agenda process. Any project under $15,000 requires
informal bidding. Projects over $15,000 require formal bidding,
and any projects over $25,000 require Board approval in accordance
with District procurement regulations. The budget is prepared
under assumptions included in the 30-year Master Plan approved last
July by the Directors.
L
1C9800I8 A
r' S/ID/90
1990-91 Or NSS OpHUTf00 PO® 9pL�2
SmOOQT IYffAASfOB/02PABBIOR w. 3(A®A9'ID ancmr xepOlA&Rprg
s IAI IBI (C) (.) (B) (e)
Im[. Dve Se Ins. Om 1'a Se[al
M Jar Bmq.r 1169-90 90-91 Bud 2dtLtim/ Ro ul tm'9 Rec—dN -Joe Pm.m[ tar Rmaramoxtl
eueaec Rma.p ed aneinn ..g.a..= ternevee/O........
1. Or9 i... $17,697,000 919,266,000 $720,000 $619,000 $1.599,... arpeec lwel ep to gat of
Wag ana ueeerired pe.lfima. SS tldltlmtl pw1
9.v.[ice clone vlll b pheetl Inta�wyr ran pee[p[l+e[ily ce
uinucln/[sY1zacly1mc�ell�eA ramdvet�.er
ga.litp maltari.q equspmnc e.d m.a.,. mjar
a.d comtznecion pnlenm.
2. We[ Carrel 1 516611000 5,670,000 <17,000a <t7,000f Ioeeesae P 2./9ee.eu tar
C4m1r+1 S,L�lg.l Sy6IDp041 [nexeene//Oxauei
CagW 4
cele[Sm $270,000 A reel. le..l.
d C rla Sod. <235,000> O.ed In foul LL
(Se rn .camera am [rant
eydtmfd.l 11ne. t.eo 1
pyd[egm ealflde
aulldu,.
es Pe[[v0. <25,00m Cmtra" a ldee
CAlocide !. dige.u[ gm
(A Rule 431.1).
Purr— <16,000> .... el/eLmleel
e, S21e[fd. t[eec..nt tm
.pAspe.d primary
a l.siflspmfinea.:
Abe mad for
.a1[Sd. ...I.
ae Pelymrn 5 69,000 gee,.SmAnea.se
tler Lxre.nee.
«$11..00e
1. Prab..iea.l 119s0,000 3.194,000 350,000 984.000 1,366,000 • W. mncr.rt tar plmt pel.tlnq.
r aad Con. • Ignrm..d gmmel antl l r legal .ervlce..
S.raiee. • Al[ mb.im. eeaeultmu.
g. 5olid. R®vel 5.300,000 6,000,000 300.000 200,000 5001000 • Loa.. b dimo.a ... far private
amal 01.p.al m./dbpe.al opu... e. ..la at inezesee0
yd m.ttlttime ead Coyece C.eyea eloeme.
S. equlpmnt 200.000 26S,000 45,000 65,000 • Imre... in ... at am." gaipmnc.
testy..
6. 9ep.itn/ 3,765,000 31795,000 30,000 30,000 • 9ravld. far engaivq.elnt.ame.nod[ewi[e in
ewne®.aael mwarded and vpgmded tall em.ode mrtzo:
service./ eq.lpmnc.
Suppllee
1. 9e..e[[A .nd 2,070,000 2,694,000 Ba,000 366.000 624,000 • Additiou.l mpite[inq required.
manitorl.9
m B. urS tlm 7,220,000 6.345,000 <015,000> <91S,0001 • Cacup dm m of pat—, aperi.xa—,h nev
.qulp .r.
9. ON.[ 2,602.000 2,916,000 100,000 376,000 376,000 • Iffioex to mp rt pbnned.utt ead ,ipmnt
d R."li.. add .. fa At60 pemlci..W gretiaq fine.
10. Setel lain[ $46,501,000 $30,207,000 31,608,000 52.010,000 53.626.000
ap.[eting
B an.e.
11. 9.v.nuae aad 21030,000 2,600,000 275.000 315.000 530,000
ofbac.
. x.t a.iac S44,331,000 S61,601,000 $1.333,000 $1,143.000 53,016,0o0
0pe[ecing
r
r
r
Page 9
- Source of Funds: The budget will be financed from existing
capital funds accumulated in the individual Districts, Capital
Facilities Funds, proceeds from the 1986 sale of Certificates
of Participation, new connection fees, limited Federal and
State grant funds and from new borrowing to be approved by the
Directors.
- Master-Planned Projects: The 1990-91 COPY requirements total
$103,422,000, an increase of $697,000 over 1989-90. The
budget includes funds for several major master-planned
projects, including completing the construction of the central
- power generation facilities at both plants, additional primary
treatment and sludge handling facilities at Plant 1, expansion
of the administration building and the construction of a new
central laboratory.
r, - Project Categorization: Schedule B-2 entitled Classification
of Budgeted Projects by Revenue Program Categories classifies
all the proposed 1990-91 capital outlay projects into three
categories to assist the Directors in evaluating the need for
the proposed levels of expenditures. These categories are:
- Replacement/Reconstruction Projects - These projects are
v' required to replace or rehabilitate aging or deteriorated
equipment or structures.
m - Improvement/Upgrade Projects - These projects are mandated
Sy various regulatory agencies, including the EPA, State
Regional Water Quality Control Boards, South Coast Air
Quality Management District, and other local agencies.
- Additional Capacity/Increased Hydraulic Requirements
Projects - These projects are required to accommodate
increase hydraulic requirements (additional flows) that the
Joint Works facilities must process and dispose of over the
next five to ten years, as identified in the latest Joint
.d Works Master Plan.
The $103,422,000 in proposed CORP projects is allocated to
these three categories as follows:
Project Category 1990-91 Budget Allocation
Replacement/Reconstruction $ 28, 801,000
Improvement/Upgrade 12, 367,000
Increased Hydraulic Requirements 62 ,254 , 000
Total 1990-91 CORF Budget Request $103,422, 000
The staff is available to answer any questions from the Directors.
If you desire additional information before the meeting, please
contact Wayne Sylvester or Gary Streed at (714 ) 962-2411.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF
ORANGE COUNTY
PERSONNEL
RECOMMENDATIONS
— 2�� o�toPalitan 0r'dolsT9
s �
Since l9sk
O�gNGE C0'0
1990-1991 FISCAL YEAR
_ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
91 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
I C9a.ELLIE AVENUE
M E M O R A N D U M A,C.SOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 927989127
171n969-9411
Date: May 23, 1990
To: Boards of Directors
Subject: Proposed Personnel and Organizational Changes for Fiscal
Year 1990-91
BACKGROUND
During the annual budget preparation process the staff evaluates
personnel requirements for the upcoming and future fiscal years.
This review of staffing needs takes into consideration anticipated
new or expanded programs, the start-up of new facilities and the
ongoing maintenance and operation of the existing Joint Works
Treatment Facilities and the individual District's collection
systems. Staff recommendations for the 1990-91 fiscal year are
contained in this report.
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
The Committee has previously been advised that major treatment
plant expansion underway and new programs being implemented to
comply with changing regulatory requirements would require
significant staffing increases to operate and maintain the
facilities and to support related activities and other required
programs.
Over the past five years we have completed and placed into service
$62.2 million of new plant facilities and equipment. We currently
have $106.5 million in new treatment plant facilities under
construction that will be completed and placed into service during
the 1989-90 budget year; another $111.1 million in treatment plant
facilities that will be completed during the next few years; and
$24 .5 million in individual District facilities under
construction. An additional $251.3 million in treatment facilities
and $64.2 million in collection facilities are being designed and
will be constructed and placed into service over the next several
years. The 30 year Action Plan Master Plan adopted by the Boards
last year projects capital improvements totalling $1.48 billion (in
1989 dollars) under current NPDES permit conditions.
This year our various departments requested 72 new positions. The
General Manager has reviewed those requests with the Department
.- Heads and is recommending that the Fiscal Policy Committee
authorize 55 new positions for 1990-91. Many of these positions
will not be filled until later in the year, and some may not be
WS014
Page 2
filled at all in 1990-91 if completion of construction projects is
delayed. Two of the 55 positions are part-time, and four are to
replace part-time positions being deleted.
Summary of Proposed Additional Staffing
Program/System Position r
Management
Board Secretary & Support 2
Personnel 1
Finance
Accounting <1>
Information Services 5
Operations and Maintenance
Sewage Collection Systems 4 `
General Plant and Equipment Maintenance 11
Treatment Plant Operations/Training 8 _
Technical Services
Regulatory Compliance (Air, Land, Water) 2 r
Source Control Program 7
Process Monitoring and Laboratory 5
Engineering
Facilities Planning and Design 5
Construction Management 6
Total 55
ti
The proposed new positions would raise the authorized staffing
level from 571 to 626, an increase of approximately 9.6%.
ANNUAL COST
Based upon the anticipated need to fill the proposed new positions
over the course of the next year, the recommendations would add
$1,960,630 or approximately 9.8%, to the estimated fiscal year
1990-91 salary budget. The total net salary cost of the proposed r
organizational changes detailed in this report for both next year
and future years, when all positions are eventually filled, is
summarized on a departmental basis as follows:
r
GGG014
r
Page 3
Net Salary Cost of Chances
Department 1990-91 Future Maximum
Management $101,928 $101,928
Finance 99,228 171,504
Operations & Maintenance 868,036 953,904
Technical Services 406,998 477,084
Engineering 484,440 484,440
Total $ 1,960,630 $ 2 , 188,860
Employee benefits paid by the Districts including retirement,
health, life, disability, workers compensation and unemployment
insurance and uniforms would add approximately 30% to the salary
totals.
OTHER PENDING ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES
Reports on the following proposed organizational changes were
submitted under separate cover because of the need to be considered
prior to completion of the 1990-91 budget process, and were
approved by the Joint Boards in April, 1990.
Finance Department: The Directors recently decided to proceed
with plans for securing a bond underwriter and counsel to
assist in issuing securities for financing major portions of
the Districts' new master-planned facilities expansion
program. The Committee has recommended that staff be
developed to provide ongoing support for this activity as the
Districts will be in the financial market for a long time.
Because of our imminent entry into the debt market, financial
staff will have to be added as soon as possible, prior to the
beginning of the 1990-91 budget year. Staff therefore
submitted a separate report and recommendation to the
Committee on organizational changes for the Finance
Department that incorporate both the recommended changes
needed to support expanding Districts' operation and the debt
market activity as well.
Engineering/Scientific Intern Program: Staff also submitted
a separate report proposing implementation of an Engineering/
Scientific Intern Program to enable the hiring of college
students part-time to help on specific projects and to serve
.+ as a basis for helping to recruit future engineers and
scientists to work full-time for the Districts.
Staff recommended that this program be considered as soon as
possible so that recruitment could begin before the current
college term ended.
GGSM4
Page 4
The above proposals are reflected in the authorized personnel
numbers and organizational charts in this report. '
DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED STAFFING INCREASES r
The following discussion provides a summary explanation of the
proposed changes for 1990-91, the salary cost of which is detailed r
by organizational unit in Exhibit A, and by position classification
in Exhibit B. Revised organizational charts reflecting the
proposed changes are also included. _
MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
b
The Management Department includes the General Manager's Office,
the Board Secretary's Office, the Public Information Office, the
Management Support Office and the Personnel and Safety/Security
Office. 22 full-time and 12 part-time positions are currently
authorized in this department.
2160 - Board Secretary's Office '
One Secretary ($2057-$2558) position is proposed to provide
additional clerical support to the Board Secretary and to the r
General Manager on matters pertaining to the Boards of
Directors' activities and official Districts' records.
2170 - Management Sunnort
The transfer of an Office Aide ($1806-$2246) from the
Accounting division is proposed to place all Office Aides in '
the same organizational unit. These positions are responsible
for the mailroom, reproduction work and other miscellaneous
office related tasks. +�
2180 - Personnel and Safety/Security Office
One Personnel Analyst ($2838-$3690) is proposed for this
division to provide the additional office support needed on
employee matters for the expanding work force.
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
r
The Finance and Administration Department includes the Director of
Finance's office, the Accounting Division, the Purchasing and
Warehouse Division and the Information Services Division. 52 Is
positions are currently authorized in this department.
r
GGS014
r
Page 5
2210 - Director of Finance's Office
Changes were proposed in a separate report regarding staffing
required for debt marketing and expanding operations.
2220 - Accounting
One Office Aide ($1806-$2246) position is recommended to be
transferred to the Management Support Division to place all
Office Aides in the same organizational unit.
2230 - Purchasing and Warehouse
No changes are currently proposed in this division.
2240 - Information Services
This division was added in the 1988-89 budget to coordinate,
implement and maximize the utilization of computerization in
all departments. The division has been effective in reducing
our reliance on consultants and is in constant demand for both
hardware and software problem solving and for implementing
management information systems. As their support efforts and
capabilities become known and the installed computer base
grows, the Information Services Division's functions continue
to evolve and to expand.
Three Programmer ($2743-$3411) positions are proposed to
provide support for the evaluation, selection and
implementation of a maintenance management system; to support
the growing local area network in Technical Services; to
assist in the design and implementation of new computerized
treatment plant process monitoring and control systems to be
installed at Plant No. 1 as a part of J-23-2; and to assist the
growing number of computer users.
One additional Information Services Technician III ($2743-
$3411) position is requested to provide additional hardware
support services and for installation and implementation of
future mini-computer based systems for maintenance management
and process monitoring.
A new series of classifications is proposed in the graphics
and desktop publishing area to provide additional needed
support to all departments and to improve our communications
ability and to separate the secretarial work load from the
<� service function. One Sr. Graphics Technician ($2327-$2894)
position is proposed for budgeting purposes.
GGSG14
Page 6
.r
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT
The Operations and Maintenance Department is responsible for the
day-to-day ongoing operations and maintenance of the Joint Works V
Treatment Facilities and the individual District's collection
system. There are 335 authorized positions in the department which
consists of the following seven divisions: y
3310 - General Superintendent's Office I �
This office is charged with the management and evaluation of
the maintenance and operation functions to ensure efficiency
and ability to meet operational requirements and with other
special projects to maintain the ongoing functionality of the ko
facilities and the processes.
Since December, when the position was approved, we have been yw
actively seeking qualified candidates for the position of
Emergency Preparedness Coordinator ($3682-$4787) . This
position consolidates the responsibilities currently split
among several staff members, and establishes the position
responsible for carrying out the Disaster Preparedness Plan
approved as a part of "2020 VISION". Because we have not been
successful in recruiting any qualified applicants with an
engineering degree, registration and suitable experience,
staff is proposing to increase the salary range to the
equivalent of a Senior Engineer ($4106-$5337 ) to provide more
flexibility in our recruitment effort.
An additional Engineer ($3682-$4787) with experience in
electrical power generation and distribution is proposed.
This position will add the needed expertise to maintain the
new Central Power Generation Facilities and other U
sophisticated electrical systems. U
The deletion of an existing Engineering Aide I ($2043-$2541)
and the addition of an Engineering Aide II ($2264-$2816) is ■
proposed to reclassify a current employee whose duties have
expanded to include the monthly and annual departmental
reports and the collection, monitoring, organization and y
presentation of plant process data as well as other special
requirements.
An additional Senior Clerk ($1806-$2246 ) position is proposed r
to provide support for the training section of the Plant
Operations Division and their increased needs resulting from
the completion of the Master Plan, the numerous new facilities L11
and to support the Emergency Preparedness Engineer.
r.
u
GGS014
Page 7
3330 - Plant Maintenance
The Plant Maintenance Division is responsible for digester
cleaning, grounds maintenance, painting, plumbing, carpentry,
janitorial services and general labor assignments throughout
the plants as well as off-site sludge hauling and disposal.
57 positions are currently authorized for this division.
Two Maintenance Field Supervisors ($3289-$4275) are proposed
to replace one Senior Foreman ($2867-$3728) position which
will be deleted. This will enable assignment of a middle
manager at each plant to provide the necessary supervision in
this division and to coordinate the efforts of the several
foremen and allow them to devote more time to directing their
leadmen and workers.
Two of the existing six Equipment Operator ($2399-$2987)
positions are proposed to be deleted because of increasing use
of private contractors in our off-site sludge management and
beneficial reuse program.
3340 - Collection Facilities
Division 3340 is responsible for maintenance of the Districts'
800 miles of trunkline sewers, 32 pump stations, 3 in-plant
side stream pump stations and the trunk sewer caustic soda
injection program for odor control. There are 27 authorized
positions in this division.
Two Collection Facilities Field Supervisor ($3289-$4275)
positions are proposed: one for the trunk sewer maintenance
group and one for the pump station maintenance group. These
positions would perform the day-to-day management of the two
groups which will allow the leadmen and foremen to spend their
time directly supervising the field crews and will allow the
Facilities Manager to concentrate on collection system
management planning and problem solving matters.
The existing two Collection Facilities Supervisor ($2867-
$3728) positions are proposed to be reclassified to Foreman
($2716-$3530) positions as a result of the above change in the
organizational and management structure.
One each Senior Collection Facilities Worker ($2225-$2770)
and Collection Facilities Worker II ($1926-$2399) positions
are proposed to round out existing and new crews to enable us
to maintain our routine schedule of cleaning and maintaining
sewers and pump stations and to enhance the safety of our
crews working in increasingly busy streets.
GGS014
r
Page 8
i ,
3350 - Mechanical Maintenance y
The Mechanical Maintenance Division includes 62 authorized J '
positions. This division is responsible for maintaining a V
wide variety of mechanical equipment throughout the two
treatment plants, including stationary engines, pumps,
hydraulic systems and belt filter presses as well as the yd
vehicle fleet and the portable/emergency equipment.
Work loads are expected to increase dramatically for this
division as a result of the recent completion of major
facilities such as the new $35 million Plant No. 1 Headworks
and the $27 million Ocean Outfall Booster Station at Plant
No. 2 and the $ 20 million odor control facilities. Four r.
Senior Mechanic ($2415-$3007) , one Equipment Operator ($2399-
$2987 ) and two Mechanic ($2063-$2569 ) positions are proposed
to enable staff to maintain the current preventive maintenance -W
program for keeping breakdowns to a minimum and to respond
promptly when repairs are needed to keep the plant equipment
operating.
u
3360 - Electrical Maintenance
i
The Electrical Maintenance Division is responsible for all 4+
electrical equipment including motors, switch gear, lights,
pumps, substations and cabling within the plants and at the
pump stations. 26 positions are authorized within the - L
division.
One Lead Electrical Technician ($2906-$3618 ) position is
proposed to replace an Electrical Technician I ($2334-$2906)
position which is proposed for deletion. This change will
give the division better work force control and safer working `
conditions in environmental control systems and other 1r
electrical maintenance.
3370 - Instrumentation Maintenance „r
Division 3370, which has 24 authorized positions, is
responsible for the installation, maintenance and repair of
thousands of meters, controls, programmable logic `
controllers, transmitters and other instrumentation
throughout the plants and at the 32 pump stations. These
components provide vital information for monitoring plant �+
processes to help ensure that they are operating properly and
that the Districts comply with our ocean discharge and air
quality emissions requirements.
All of the new facilities under construction, as well as those
recently completed, have extensive programmable logic '
controllers and other sophisticated instruments. As the
projects are completed the essential preventive maintenance
I
Lr
GGsmc
L
Page 9
and repair work becomes the responsibility of the
Instrumentation Division.
In order for staffing to keep pace with the expanding
responsibilities, one Instrument Technician II ($2751-$3425) ,
one Instrument Technician I ($2334-$2906) and one Instrument
Maintenance Man ($2120-$2640) are proposed.
3380 - Plant Operations
The 118 authorized positions in the Plant Operations Division
are responsible for operating the sewage treatment and
disposal processes at both plants and for meeting the
Districts' NPDES ocean discharge permit requirements. These
responsibilities require staffing at the plants 24 hours per
day, seven days per week. Approximately 75% of the time this
is the only division with staff on site.
One Shift Supervisor ($3079-$4004 ) position is proposed to
provide additional process control supervision, to oversee
the ongoing operational requirements and to assist with
regulatory compliance.
A Senior Plant Operator ($2658-$3310) position is recommended
to serve as the coordinator at Plant No. 1 between the six
major construction project contractors and the ongoing sewage
treatment process requirements.
Nine Plant Operator ($2318-$2886) positions are proposed to
increase the sludge dewatering staffing during the a.m. and
p.m. shifts, to allow a trained operator to remain in the
Control Center to monitor operational activities at all times
and to expand the in-house training and retraining program.
One full-time Control Center Clerk ($1811-$2255) position is
proposed to replace four part-time Control Center Clerk
($8.53/hr max) positions because of the difficulty to hire,
-' train and retain qualified part-time help.
TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
The Technical Services Department is responsible for the Districts'
_ industrial toxics source control program; the recently established
conservation, reclamation and reuse program; testing and analysis
of samples to monitor treatment plant processes and industrial
discharges; compliance with environmental standards;
administration of the $2 million per year ocean monitoring program;
and the Districts' liaison efforts on a wide variety of air, land
and water laws and regulations which govern our operations. There
.. are currently 91 authorized positions in five divisions.
6GS014
Page 10
3510 - Director of Technical Services' Office r
Air quality laws and regulations are changing rapidly at the
federal, state and regional level. Passage of the federal r
Clean Air Act is expected during 1990, and the California
State Legislature and the California Air Resources Board are
bringing new air quality requirements on a statewide basis.
On the basis of the South Coast Air Quality Management
District's (SCAQMD) air quality management plan and other
considerations, the SCAQMD is enacting increasingly stringent
permit requirements on the Districts. All of these developing
issues are creating an increasing demand for Districts' staff
time for responses and for coordination of our efforts. These
issues have been managed by various Districts' personnel
working in the Technical Services, Engineering and Operations
and Maintenance Departments. Our ability to maintain agency-
wide coordination and effective responsiveness in this r
rapidly changing and growing regulatory arena is being
. challenged.
For this reason, staff is recommending the creation of a new r
position, Air Quality Manager ($4106-$5337) , who will have the
responsibility of maintaining day-to-day supervisory
oversight of these activities, as well as providing focused ..
response to emerging federal, state and regional laws and
regulations. This position will provide the leadership
necessary for the Districts to achieve compliance with all
applicable air regulations, consistent with our 30-year
Master Plan, "2020 VISION", which establishes consistent
compliance with all environmental regulations as one of its
key objectives.
3520 - Compliance
The Compliance Division consists of 13 full-time staff and
utilizes several consultants in their quality assurance/
quality control section, the marine monitoring/marine science
section and the air quality section.
The addition of one Senior Clerk ($1806-$2246) position is
proposed to provide clerical support for this report intensive r
division, to free the technical and professional staff to
perform their other duties and to provide support for the
Division's existing Secretary. r
3530 - Conservation Reclamation and Reuse Division
r
No changes are currently recommended.
GGS014
Page 11
3580 - Laboratory
The Laboratory Division performs analysis of samples from the
various industrial waste permittees, from the treatment plant
processes and from the ocean monitoring program to determine
compliance with regulatory requirements and the effectiveness
of plant operations, and to determine our effects on public
health and the environment. There are 33 positions authorized
in this division.
Four Lab Analyst ($2280-$2835) positions are recommended to
free four upper-level positions which have been bumped down to
solve immediate staffing requirements caused by increasing
work load demands at the technician level and to provide
additional staff for sample analysis from the stepped-up
sampling program by the Source Control Division anticipated
for the next fiscal year.
One Clerk ($1618-$2013) position is proposed to provide
additional clerical and data entry support for this division
and to allow the Lab Helper currently performing these
clerical duties to be better utilized in the laboratory.
3590 - Source Control
The 34 position Source Control Division is the front line of
the Districts' program to control toxic discharges to the
sewerage system to protect our environment and to ensure our
ability to comply with NPDES permit effluent requirements.
An additional Associate Engineer ($3233-$4203) position is
proposed for the Special Projects Section to provide improved
liaison and contract administration with special dischargers
such as SAWPA and the IRWD, to ensure compatibility and
completeness of our pretreatment programs and federal and
state mandates and to help identify and quantify sources of
influent toxics.
An Assistant Engineer ($2725-$3544) position is proposed to
work in the Permits Section to implement the recently revised
Regulations For Use of Districts' Facilities (the industrial
waste ordinance) and to implement recommendations from the EPA
for improving our source control program.
In order to have position titles which more properly reflect
the type of work being done and which are more closely
identified with the Division and its work mission, and to
create uniformity in the job titles, staff is proposing the
following changes:
GGS014
Page 12
From TO
Lead Industrial Waste Inspector Lead Source Control Inspector
Industrial Waste Inspector II Source Control Inspector II
Industrial Waste Inspector I Source Control Inspector I
Industrial Waste Assistant Source Control Assistant
The inspection and monitoring staff is proposed to be
increased by one each Source Control Inspector II ($2458-
$3057) and Source Control Inspector I ($2188-$2721)
positions. These Inspectors are needed to monitor SAWPA and
its member agencies in the implementation, and coordination of
their pretreatment programs (costs are billed to SAWPA) and to
provide additional staff for routine and special downstream
enforcement sampling, inspection and monitoring of Districts'
permittees.
A Senior Clerk ($1806-$2246) and two part-time Assistant
($8.80/hr. max) positions are proposed to provide additional
clerical support and data entry and to collect water use,
property tax and sampling data to ensure proper allocation of
costs to permittees through the user fee process.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
The three divisions of the Engineering Department include 59
authorized positions. Additionally, nine temporary construction
inspectors (who receive no benefits) are currently employed and 8
consultants are utilized to assist in construction management
activities through professional services contracts. The
department is responsible for planning and managing the Districts'
facilities expansion and improvement projects. The recommended new
facilities in the recently adopted "2020 VISION" Master Plan total
$1.48 billion over the next 30 years in 1989 dollars.
In order to help administer this extensive treatment plant and trunk
"ewer construction program, staff is recommending the addition of 11
positions in this department. Several of these additions are the
continuation of the long-term process approved by the Directors last
year which will enable us to enhance our in-house capabilities and
to phase out the need for on-site construction management
consultants. This will result in considerable cost savings for
administering our capital facilities programs in the future.
3710 - Director of Encineering's Office
No changes are currently recommended.
GGS014 ..
Page 13
3720 - Planning and Design Management
Virtually all of our treatment plant and sewer design is done
by consulting engineers. However, an Engineer ($3682-$4787)
position with experience in electrical and instrumentation
processes is proposed to coordinate and review the
increasingly complex design and plans in this discipline.
An additional Associate Engineer ($3233-$4203) is also
proposed in the Treatment Plant Section to assist an incumbent
engineer who is currently administering 19 projects. This
position is responsible for monitoring current design
projects and the performance of consultants, writing the scope
of work for new projects, reviewing specifications and
drawings and coordinating construction documents for bidding.
A Senior Engineering Aide ($2800-$3482) position is
recommended to begin work on complete computerized (CADD)
composite drawings of the existing facilities for future use
in design and construction and for emergency response needs.
One each Engineering Aide II ($2264-$2816) and Engineering
Aide I ($2043-$2541) positions are proposed to prepare
drawings and exhibits, to gather data and to perform
calculations, to maintain logs, spreadsheets and to assist
other professional staff as required as a result of the
increasing number of projects being planned and designed.
3790 - Construction Management
An additional Engineer ($3682-$4787) position is proposed to
provide ongoing project management services now provided by an
outside consultant.
A new independent quality assurance section is proposed to be
headed up by a new Principal Engineering Associate ($3418-
$4443) . This section will report directly to the Construction
Manager and will be responsible for training within the
division, satisfying AQMD and other permit requirements and
general quality assurance within the construction management
process.
One Senior Construction Inspector ($3061-$3806) and two
Construction Inspector ($2800-$3482) positions are proposed
to augment the inspection staff and to replace temporary part-
time employees.
One entry level Engineering Aide I ($2043-$2541) position is
proposed to provide support to staff in maintaining and
monitoring planning, design and construction schedules,
collecting data and documentation and performing various
other support activities including computer input.
665074
3/16/90
DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY EXHIBIT A
PROPOSED 1990-91 PERSONNEL CHANGES
A B C D E F
Currentl" Proposed Revised Annual
Dept Authorized New Toral Max Cost
No. Department/ Division Positions Positions Positions (savings)
1 2150 GENERAL MANAGER 2 2
2 2160 Board Secretary 2 1 3 30,696
r 3 2170 Management Support 6 1 7 26.952
4 I 2180 Personnel 24 1 25 44.280
5 34 37 101.928
6
r 7 2210 DIRECTOR OF FINANCE 3
8 2220 Accounting 20 (1) 19 (26,952)
9 2230 Purchasing & Warehouse 17 17
r10 2240 Information systems 12 5 17 198.456
11 52 4 56 171.504
12 I
m13 : 3310 GENERAL SUPERINTENDENT 21 2 23 94,296
141 3330 Plant Maintenance 57 (1) 56 (13,824)
15 ' 3340 Collection Facilities 27 4 31 159.876
—16i 3350 Mechanical Maintenance 62 7 69 241.336
17 , 3360 Electrical Maintenance 26 26 8,544
IS ! 3370 Instrumentation 24 3 27 107.652
—191 3380 Plant Operations 118 8 126 335,524
201 335 23 358 953,904
211
.221 3510 DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES 7 1 8 64,044
23 , 3520 Compliance 13 1 14 26.952
24 ! 3530 Conservation. Recl & Reuse 4 4
.25 3580 Laboratory 33 5 38 160.236
261 3390 Source Control 34 7 41 225.852
27 ! 91 14 103 477,084
28
291 3710 DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING 9 9
30 3720 Planning & Design 20 5 25 213.948
_31I 3790 Construction Management 30 6 36 270,492
321 59 11 70 484.440
33
34 TOTAL 571 55 626 2, 188.860
r
PERS9IA.XLS 9:09 AM
3/29/90 PROPOSED PERSONNEL CHANGES 11HIBIT 8
BY POSITION CLASSIFICATION
1990.91
A B C D E P G
Total Changing Changing Step 5 Marcum
Current Current Proposed Proposed Monthly Annual
No. Classification Rath Aath Add Delete Auth Rate Cost
leavings)
1 2150 General Manager's Office 2
2 2160 Board secretary 2
3 Secretary t 21558 30,696
4 2170 Management Support 6 -
5 Office Aide 1 1 2 2,246 26,952 r
6 2180 Personnel 29
7 Personnel Analyst 1 1 2 3,690 WHO
8 2210 Director of Finance's Office 3 .r
9 2220 Accounting 6 Revenue 20
10 Office Aide 1 1 2,246 (26,952)
11 2230 Purchasing/Warehousiag 17 "
12 2240 Information Services 12
13 Programmer 2 3 5 31411 122.796
14 Info Services Tech III 2 1 3 31111 40,93E
15 Sr Graphics Tech 1 1 21891 341128
16 Graphics Tech 21559
17 3310 General Superintendent's Office 21
18 Emergency Preparedness Coordinator 1 1 5,337 64.044 `
19 Emergency Preparedness coordinator 1 1 1,787 157,4441
20 Engineer 3 l 4 4,767 57,444
21 Engineer Aide lI 1 1 2,816 33,752
22 Engineer Aide I 2 1 t 2,541 130,4921
23 5r Clerk 2 1 3 2,246 26.952
24 1330 Plant Maintenance 57
25 Mtce Field Supervisor 2 2 4,275 102.600
26 Sr Foreman I 1 31728 144,7361
27 Equipment Operator 6 2 4 2,987 (71,681) ..
28 3340 Collection Facilities 27
29 Collection Pan Field Supvr 2 2 4,275 102,600
30 Collection Facilities Supervisor 2 2 3,728 189,4721
31 Foreman 2 2 3,530 84,120
32 Sr Collection Pic Worker 3 1 4 2,770 33,240
33 Collection Pic Worker tI 10 1 11 2,399 28,188 r
34 3350 Mechanical Maintenance 62
35 Sr Mechanic 19 4 23 3,007 144,336
36 mechanic 20 2 22 20569 61,656
37 Equipment Operator 1 1 2 2,907 35,844
38 3360 Electrical Maintenance 26
39 Lead Electrical Tech 3 l 4 3,618 43,416
10 Electrical Tech I 6 1 5 21906 (31,072)
r
PIES9IB.ILS 5:30 PM
3/29/90 PROPOSHD P39SOBNBL CHANGES 31HIBIT 3
BY POSITION CLASSIFICATION
1990.91
A B C 0 E P G
Total Changing changing Step 5 Nardmum
Current Current Proposed Proposed Monthl➢ Ann0al
No. Classification Apth Auth Add Delete Total Rate Cast
ISavin s
11 3370 Instrumentation 24
42 Instrument Tech II 8 1 9 3,425 41,100
43 Instrument Tech I 5 1 6 2,906 34,872
44 Instrument Mtce Nan 2 1 3 2,640 31,680
45 3380 Plant Operations 118
46 Shift Supervisor 16 1 17 4,004 18,04E
47 Sr Plant Operator 27 1 26 3,310 39,720
48 Plant Operator 39 9 48 2,886 311,68E
49 control Center clerk 8 1 3 21255 27,060
5D Part-time Control Ctr Clerk 4 4 1,479 (70,592)
51 3510 Director of Tech Services' Office 7
52 Air quality Manager 1 1 5,337 64,044
53 3520 Compliance 13
54 Sr Clerk 1 1 2,246 26,952
55 3530 Conservation,Eeclamation 6 Reuse 4
56 3580 Laboratory 33
57 Lab Analyst 9 4 13 2,835 136,080
58 Clerk 1 1 21013 21,156
59 3590 Source Control 34
60 Associate Engineer 3 1 4 1,203 50,436
61 Assistant Engineer 3 1 4 3,544 42,528
62 Inspector II 9 1 10 3,057 36,684
- 63 Inspector I 4 1 5 2,721 32,552
54 Sr Clerk 4 1 5 2,246 26.952
65 Part-time Assistant 2 2 1,525 36,600
66 3710 Director of Eogineering's Office 9
67 3720 Planning A Design 20
68 Engineer 4 1 5 1,787 57,444
69 Associate Engineer 2 1 3 41203 50,43fi
70 BY Engineering Aide 1 1 2 31482 41,784
71 Engineering Aide II 1 1 2 2,816 33,79E
72 Engineering Aide I I 1 1 2,541 30,49E
73 3790 Construction Management 30
74 Engineer 5 1 6 1,787 57,444 _
75 Principal Eogr Associate 1 1 1,443 53,315
76 Sr Construction Inspector 5 1 6 3,806 45,672
77 Constructioa Inspector 9 2 11 3,182 83,568
if Engineering Aide I 1 1 2,541 30,492
80 TOTAL 571 68 t3 2,180,860
PEB891B.PLS 5:34 PH
t t a t a a t t a t t a a t a t t t t
m
omme
mmmr orou
mrvrm memo
a
muY
______________ _________________
Am am mPmm omo vm®.ana
my mm rum®.
om emoA
emA nvo m mlm Yrm rumo�yrnmr.
mlo An m m m m mr PIQ f urRl ruvmm mvu
mrm uum �u
m rm Pmmm mva�ro mm
roue uvrnm r Aalmv o�m mAm ®m
Y 3A Im A
mnm A � Ivaiu a ovum
rvma movmrar �rmmrY o
mnm mmom
aalm rmn v r,7 —r mmm amm. omv mouun vmA
m=r o o°�® o® vn' m® lorinn m®
m ao
mmm mmm
Ammmm voroormor
omnm ammo
vrm
rovrtm
PAYm
u nry Imwm --uo rmr m me om vm mrow mmr.FAao., uormn r m� coma m
mlm mY'➢ 60 a rm m 1 m IV
A IOn mCLrO m®rY��� mlmA 01At IOY9 mim
mmYA m
m Im)mld6 mrNYq M1R mPm YNmYt mr1351m qA6
IaD-IW1
dXW W PIN
33
6mAd
aam
L
X E
W14D 5[a'S aPPIa IgYWpP.1I$aPM} P3AWML MPIR J
auA a um erP�d od
1 1
SBE SBE
y
MOCK..Wm N3 mam SOl@ QVm PIXSmWtt.
d3[i SPOT L
B]1PY 8L[4 dPWO apg14
I S m SR PR)P[W MST I aNpd
X>H � I
Y�1
SmPST SNPAMT 0 1 SIMI36i1 PWWWRI WIL
3
M911 YO M9] �
y
WO MOO 5[CP
1
L
ulna 3saT
3
]m3 MIS �
l
Ns2 y
m Ap
$-f- 9WEM
IaSS ES IOSS 3Va
reel
awim=K L
IAII ]OI
X
$P Sa 4VIPD
sma5 am: I IF aPrla 3Ia 1 SEAM".o. eaic CLIPS
t ] IDND Zbs 1 I
Ia56P an
1rtN II16 IOYP ?N6
a31¢ a3u y
0 0
IOSIP IDll IMIP ID13
vT sd RAM
L
Imn a lumm I IQ01300M 9AMUL am= wmMm L
14�
SSE P3WP)�P!NS6 sPE PYi� MmS6 S6 P3W fIS1L f0 P106 6 � L
L
_ T
lag l991
WEMMM S MWO MW MUT N P1M S
>SB
SPA£RN.
SWMWRIDIXI
1 Ma
m m vo
es9v suer Wu Ab'!suee mra
1 1
seas sea
m rAW ITS
0
sAle
lm
evert Wu
6 l 11 X 31 69 26 n
PIdM 1 P=2 TIIN➢q 6PAIUL Mua 4 wm PLAM MM91NR WLLPCRtlI MC lu NPaW m PJPCI m DISML091I
tMV WV TIlMN6 1tl01 P/1 M PIQ PILL PSd PM1 PAW
WWTN OPFMTM SVYM SPC4 prtM4 [IpS IGA N4S IIM NO MP
at PAU a PM DRAIL SLA PMA M PW MM 56fi PM6 K S M PW WiAIL
�YY
amnas a YYrmuY meanme Y®�
aYruc
YID
m
ISO
In na
ewr Yee nY me mH mn
1 1
YH ms
�y Y raz.m
0
na
m emYlu�Q memucmrs Ynu
sa
6 l 11
UJaI(Y YI® 148 mM1@
SYIY�YYi Ym PmY CWIO
1 1
M Sll) Sni
cu fAL�
ue nY
PY m�1QQ. YRi\R
1 1
as Wl Q%
d
YYIOW
HII
W NI 516miP
IMY H11
W I
IIXW H16
m PR 1EYL
1059 511
90QM O6[
W 1
1056P ZN6
W
dY[
i
1051[ IDU
re
MIS.
>y
m¢a�mmm
sn ao a
iar soR oev }w sor ea
1 1
s� sm
9MY
0
r
s¢¢¢ni®plg6 I¢A..N�6
13 I I
nlYs¢¢sfio6 y
T
PJQ 1 >IM} }n® I
Issl
am ov¢nn a�ovno
vA S.
r
r
NUT son amt soA} }um�sra
s 9 1 i
IViI 191 JM
r
L
¢wv o¢ a wr}oeo pvm vm n¢ a w n¢
3rt10 11 ll10 E6N 1S v10 �¢ s 3110 Ma } UW j I
r
I '
Id
wr oluso eusr nsvao .var¢vvv
6 A
249 >b5 M9 lof M9 $9S I
Yel
"am rev v>oe i .
6
>o� ms >my aee Ise1
1
mtn zs msio zss
iw
L
eii 4}aa¢
0
v v.
PM a
r
aPFYRWO i 101MIflWR 0@14110R PM IC
]u
arrmu.
BUP®m®m
t
r iep
m m ma
r uit mx MO saR sore m¢
] an]aPe/Baeerer ]
]ea ua
r
®vere w ere omn m PmB a rre oWia
u ss BB m n
r
PUW omooin ara eic oa our mo
- r1Q. IQ®a® m PM16 N Iq Y@Idd
1
19re
r
=m BOW
]
r 1]1B
MPNB 2 FM PO 2
r t
)5la ]Sla am
r
tBeO BOIm tm 3 IAO 2
1
mare ssW miss ssu mb00 ssBB
W
[�OPWfiY
mBW rm m4
1
r m59e Pm6
r
ea lees wBm vaBrm
O 6
mB1C mla mSIC mm
r
r
Illl'B 10
la
mu] aBB
r
aeamma®a
]
mslr me
r
y W o
B
mm tn PR P
eW iBa® vR aaaore
6.0a/M.
r
PI BBpm Bmtl r tj Ps�b.4-mt eewvm m ewi Worlmd peBrol aaae.mB•
r
aeunta tivasvx¢omPPamr pR•
]b u
4tl6LL
12I�
I 1
6qe LIn v nr
tm sort mn �svrt ma
1 Da[ I
sea sea
e¢e1Q U N f696 96 PY3 U em[Q1¢ � �
x v u x n J
Pure ioawra owtaa nmtrm ownru ¢[twos, nenomesrN
ev e106 K RA Y91L na WLL'IY left IOWY rP6 FW6Y rP6 IOFtm' L
1 1 1 1
Um im tPm tPm
a non emr ma rl¢a me ¢nt rmn smv mir n=smr L( ] ] e
am ors t(v txss
nrc( room nsn ]aoor �
a l API
wx tPPP
L.S
uPo osn(sa ¢aP ss¢o fem
D6L t xu Mx 1 xle
Pr
o¢oe awr
vv an i
e r
aea xa vme xa
no as
u
Mu ma
NOmiR
aW 1193
L
�6 w
SW ]ea I i
a u c imnn r
a
asm YN Me( ]IN
PrPa oeeaM I
Met ae]
L
YYT f(q I PSA 1m I
e
Mrs no vsm as
m ar
uses t ((m
out mtt w >(xo mow L
vs(c ato Mx xto
avow
a u
r569 aH
av n
u mnmw rmmor
DesC D93 0 S5f1 o L I
xSSP D,P 7011 L
W I Ra1162C( MYO
MA1 I]N DM9l ITA EM90 Im J
1990-1991
38ODQCRL SERVICES PM 9
105
DIAECNB DP
7ECE SERVIC83
I
6828
2 l 4
CI.ERICEL 3IR pU3LP1V IAI8XIL4
3DR SEC MMY GU3L MW
1 5337
18EID 2914
. P/Y ]NR886
4
16.00/Rr XeA.
S68I0R CLEAT!
1
1p56P 2246
CLERE
p
1p54P 2p13
14 4 38 41
C01@L3ENCE MERV., EECLAN., LR88R81DRV 6pU6CB 00hi 8.
w P8p58
CL9@L3ERC8 84A4G91 Cp®88A RECW m LRB XRRNiBR SW BCE CDRRBL m
1 REDSE Itl@RSA830B 1 1
SB59 1 5592 5559
5337
SE8 PM 58 MR DETR11. SE6 P3p8 SB P8R ULR3II. SEE PAGE SC m D8 m isu PUR SD PDR DBTEIL
i
seawlaE A®n= Euu 9
la
o nca or L w seams
1
Y a 1 4
a®oiv., Aeau., u
YBGBe1Gn am Ewa a.nlcu,/sseae svoe¢oJ1004
8e1 Pae SC fa G@I1I6 =PAGE m Pa ones Se6 Pete s Pa GCEIIL see PAa m PGA G I
mscwln �
14
AU@LIAYC61aNOLR
1
54N
amm
G e
mvuea¢saevE wo!cxexa soma exene®
r
OW ms 4m II
eEe orvn sec esmc m
Li
G x
amA aw
�r
s svxe sec s esn sec
las rza taw zrros
r.l
eEvm sec n rnv sec a exvw sec n rl
1
Ia3G D19 1G 1319 ]O6]0 1119
V
Perm sex x
lax GaP I
t
L
lave zsse '
soda¢s[ y
lase zms
y
aes
a
1a9e mu
L
YAI
l [ fl [ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
zAGE TECHNICAL SERVICES eR �
105
DIRIDOM OF
TECH SERVICES
6878
14 AB 7 41
CC@LTANCE LABORATORY MMCA4/SDPNU SOERCE Cog=
SEE PAN SA FOR DETAIL M PAGE SC FOR DETAIL ISM PAGE SD FOR DSPAIL
CONSBRV. REC.AN.,
AND RROSR
9
OONSERV, RCCJN AND
REM IDKDII EATOR
1
5377
PEN 4lYIR SPEC
2
42DI
SeCERARY
I
I059A 2558
�m
4m M mnm 4PY x
1x r
alum a
44a3 ffinm L I
4m
14 6 LL
NBYY..WL.
U]@LiIO'6 1m tW d4ltly/501PM
04 P141 56 Po9 OR6Il ffi tl�9!Do P6116 ffi PM S Rl OtM. 6[6 PI09'0 FYI M1TI11
Yg6M r
H
W]PllII4 xYl® 1 ;
a
suz r
z 10 v s
V
WH IOQ 6 P6YId f61m®4 Q7BL' BfEW.G6Lfi4H IaC1010VA4/41AYC9!
r
w0Yf4R 5049 GBA61flI 34PW Id00P61p1 NM
t t t
mz mz am
1f1[w W. F1Y w IYL MO w W. WY w fipl, r
aws nsx ms 6S6
ii
w src .Y6 arc
lax afizo iae sm 1ax zao
Swm aww. mwFLL mww.
z
tRYs y19 IOxO ]tl9 106?l yx la6Y yl9
L
IWI A15 IWI ffiS ]ffil A]5 V
y
59[HM1TY4
1
]059! IIY r
w f4W[m0
a
TOSS N09 y
vw
t
IxIP IDl]
0
Y
Prt 6sz64etr
6
r
]mmm mnm P,W m
r 1W
menu a
fn mnm
r m
19 9 P v
mcWP.,Pmae.,
me]1]oW mPmss mc]m4WPPm tmnWP
r mP.ffi 9lra mOlL ffiF]659 PW mSl6 mPlOSlW!®Il mPW YFm mlLL
91
R@3 WPIPrt.B
1
r 5g9
5 ll l
r mW1S9! P@� 9LOl4 MRm
®l®
1 9i�
r
!4$LE® 6iV'IP. f6 L v®® lSVlmi[iY.®
I 1 ]
�d 1A1 4F] 9TO
A@3 0➢R&SP2
r 91W
W N1 f4T
Y�
r
1m5TYP® �4ISOR 0®
SSN 1511
mscm
1060 %11
SC1@n
N
r Il•A ]bl
SCI@1
r ]
IOYO PlIl
r AAL9v
1
1091 1S9
m W IGFi OJE
1
IOS9 N19
r
SmW Off[
S
IVN lM6
f C 69T
r IK0 196
P/i$551548I
e.m/er.
r
1>]YIe91
wemua meAmrt mee i
m
euuclw n V
6aipw
1
fei
6aIfY aI® PIliw i®a taifa[Tln mj
len
w®IOO sa Pp a In Ua¢
NY®
1
YB
PJa1 ml.aa® taOLillfe R[GLL etll '
LY
A I1®
san
] ]
am im
L
name w P]�A w oeOcnll.w
aeeaom mclm eeeamn
1 l 1
aw aw aw
Yr
]wc m
am
a wam
avoona
mm l aan V
wnmv I I
uaua L.I
la]wa® 1
a 110 m 1 low liE a w m
1 J511 1
lan ]ea law xn
v
mmm Illlmm
1 1
lam Yea lam lan
Ile1
IOI Amen
Iola Ela
Ottmn IYimn y
IVd E16 IaIN MU
P/]IMF
efa]M 16.a1/k IY.
Ia9M me ®mI wYml
IDS9 EU IM3 'yl
I
leer
9wA 60
1
IOS61 IIA V
etw
1
IaSn AU '
feel
r/a mr
e.eo/tr.
aveanaar m a
ro
� ovnaa u
®m
1
ra
e E X
OAIOL/IRP.H PIJ®f ma tffilR)I®eaT
r ffi Pla 6 R Y6i1Il ffi PA9t 6 p and LRIDaID
Ip�
t
Xa
II 6 1 3 9
suer e] ml.aays ]ast sews mml.eeu suer rs
a PSIDS
esr
a® seam ee� rrs»em
rm (m am am
w
PGYI'RLL
m!40[
Mq
YI
PALL W>@LL
] 1 1
1A] �Al 11m
d
yy a�effi awe® a�tT lffi
e 3 3
1[UC N6 lefit ]N6 1056[ 14�5
�}ffi t16S ffi �1�
1 2 5
t 'MP lY! IMY llei tO54P ]9d1
E
eR sae
1
e.a�n..
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF
ORANGE COUNTY
_ JOINT WORKS
OPERATING BUDGETS
NI41 T10N
.� topolitan pr CIS
- y r'
0 Since 1954 .t
q�HGE COUNT
1990-1991 FISCAL YEAR
[ I t r r l r [ [ ( r r r r r ( r r t _
OCOOOOI9 A
snsreo
1990-91 a01R OPBMTMG Pbea BaIXffiS
Bondeas or itlPfAnOR/eVAp q iOp w. N11tl0AS0o OBOOpT p00YtPdMilo
IAI lei ICI Ib1 IBI fPl
Ives. Bun to Ivor. on. To total
Major Bud,.[ 1989u9-90 9090-9 I "flan/ pe9n4tery anvv®evded anjo[ Res.... for pevamodad
Nolen Mount,, yne Ion n./nv
1. M•a O.1 is., $17,607,000 419,206,000 $720.000 9079.000 OIr 699e000 a sx,enott to Wetele^ lapses[lne•l uy 10.of
Benefit• flocs vlll M rpe•ed Ised stlme�OYeddltlival py e-
•W4at l�ve•e1+n9elntmt'�g1Wv eetlallltlm�
lvteln/reppeel[reoeetlyy le. Glled al[ nd water
mallty nitoring n,ulpNoat and Nobel. eejor
0.tmvtion projects.
3. odor Control 6 5160,1000 5,570,000 <17,000> µ11000> Isar•e•e PurpOm/Raueo for
Chandual CbN.Lppl Ioea.e more... mesre.ee
C..wl..i.
CAlOrlve 6270.000 To [.mole 1-1.
ceueua ones g55,000> ...d is fuel at.
Ieadim ...abuse. evd !root
Bpdrarienl 1"..to 9bet.01
hydrogen sulfide
buildup.
,at.... QS,000> central•sulfide.
Chloride Lm dlmetar q..
(A= Rule 431.1)•
P.rrw• g6,000> PhpLLael/ch@aloLL
Chloride t.aetment get
mhe—" prine,
alerul..per[s®.vm
Alec d
u1t1Ae o0vtul. '
polymer• $.69,000 e•eg•lme.••e•as
flor lnvruu..
3311e9Y9_
3. Prof o.Wool I,850,000 3,194,000 350'... 906,000 1,366,000 • Bar vmt.mt for plant painting.
and Contract • I..." geve.LL and Into. Islet •amlore.
B.tviae. • Ala mlulon. emeeultant..
6. solids Removal 5,500,000 6,000,000 300,000 300,000 500,Oo0 • Imtw. is aspo.LL ..it. for p[laet.
and DisposalWants as. m.alt of trrer/tattions en Coyote Canyon Closets.wn•ed
5. Bluipment 200,000 245,000 65,000 651000 • imr0... 1e one of hug polPavt.
Chp.srg..
6. Meat..-./ 3•169.00o 3,195,000 30,000 a0,000 am,,.wideand ..,at.,ad11Ittlmm.�.odanry®ePi
9etvloa./ r...�t,
supplies
1. M.eetah evd 2,070,000 2,694,000 00,000 56.,000 636,000 • Additional moitorlog regnired.
Melbarlm
8. utilities 1,210,000 6,a99r000 <015,000> <016,000> •pease..did to at put—1 —0uni—ultu vw
equlpm•ot.
9. Othor 2,602,000 2,978,000 100,000 216,000 116,000 • lmrm..t0 enppa[t plautl staff ace equlmost
Materiel., .ddulon..
Supplies •Now amamt for AC1m pmaltle•and npe[ativl Sams.
10. total Joint 616,501,000 $50.207,000 $1,603,000 $2,010,000 83,626,000
0 ...tieq
Bap...
11. Rove.... end 2,050,000 2,600,000 375,000 235,000 550,000
offset.
13. Not Joint $44,531,000 $47,107,000 µ,333,000 $1n63,000 $3,076,000
0p•retlnq
SCHEDULE I
JOINT OPIMTD G FUND BUDGET REVIEW & SLMMRY 5/11/90
COMPARISON OF BUDGETED & ACTUAL EXPENDITURES & ESTIMATED CARRY-OVER
FISCAL YEAR 1989-90
(A) (B) (0) (D) (E) (F) (G)
Budget Reocamended Increase Expenditures Estimated Increase Est'd Carry-
- 1989-90 Budget or 1988-89 Expendi Or Over to Fiscal
1990-91 Decease 1989-90 Decrease Year 1990-91
1. Net Salaries, Wages &
Benefits $17,687,000 $19,286,000 $1,599,000 $13,454,000 $16,157,000 $2,703,000 $1,530,000
2. Odor Control & Chemical
Coagulants 5,687,000 5,670,000 <17,000c 4,594,000 4,648,000 54,000 1,039,000
3. Professional & Contract
Services 7,350,000 9,194,000 1,844,000 5,646,000 6,496,000 850,000 854,000
4. Equipment Charges 200,000 245,000 45,000 185,000 215,000 30,000 <15,000>
5. Repair & Maintenance
Materials & Services 3,765,000 3,795,000 30,000 3,313,000 3,361,000 48,000 404,000
6. Research & monitoring 2,070,000 2,694,000 624,000 2,511,000 2,040,000 <471,000> 30,000
7. Utilities 7,220,000 6,345,000 <875,000 4,884,000 5,051,000 167,000 2,169,000
8. Other Materials, Supplies
& Outside Services 2,602,000 2,978,000 376,000 2,370,000 2,545,000 175,000 57,000
9. Total Joint Operating
Expenses $46,581,000 $50,207,000 $3,626,000 $36,957,000 $40,513,000 $3,556,000 $6,068,000
10. Revenue and Offsets 2,050,000 2,600,000 550,000 2,461,000 2,700,000 239.000 <650 000>
11. Net Joint Operating $44 531 000 47,607,000 1Q,076,000 34 496 000 $37,813,000 S3,317.000 $6,718,000
L -
[- C L- C- C- C t C : L L [: L: C C [
t t [ t t t t t [ t t [ [ t t t t t t - .
Schedule II
BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 5/15/90
JOINT OPERATING FUND
Fiscal Year 1990-91
ALLOCATION OF JOINT OPERATING EXPENDITURES
A B C D B F G H I J
GALLONAGE FLOWS 1990-91 FUNDING 1989-90 COMPARISON
1989-90 Estimated Estimated
District Flows Estimated 1990-91 Percent District Estimated Required District Required
No. Past Year Increase Flows of Total Contribution Carryover Funding Contribution Funding
1 9,897.14 MG 236.45 MG 10,133.60 MG 10.20% $ 4,853,900 $ 684,900 $ 4,169,000 $ 4,092,000 $ 3,692,000
2 30,781.43 389.37 31,170.80 31.36% 14,930,400 2,106,900 12,823,600 14,232,000 12,841,000
3 31,183.12 333.88 31,517.00 31.71% 15,096,200 2,130,300 12,965,900 14,157,000 12,773,000
5 4,808.58 152.22 4,960.80 4.99% 2,376,200 335,300 2,040,900 2,026,000 1,828,000
6 5,563.76 10.74 5,674.50 5.61% 2,670,100 376,800 2,293,300 2,587,000 2,334,000
7 7,392.88 289.62 7,682.50 7.73% 3,679,800 519,300 3,160,500 3,638,GG0 3,282,000
11 6,157.47 53.33 6,210.80 6.25% 2,974,900 419,800 2,555,100 3,175,000 2,865,000
13 466.10 175.40 641.50 0.65% 307,300 43,400 263,900 134,000 121,000
14 1,624.27 (124.87) 1,499.40 1.51% 718,200 101,300 616,900 490,000 442,000
TOTALS 97 874.75 MG 1,516.15 MG 99 390.90 MG 100.00% $ 47,607,000 6,718,000 4O 889 000 $ 44,531,000 40 178 000
JOINT ROARS OPERATING BUDGET SCHEDULE III
JOINT OPERATING 6 WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS 5/I1/90
r 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR
1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1989-90 199D-91
ACTUAL ACTUAL PROJECTED BUDGET RECOMMEND
..................................................._____________
1. SALARIES 6 WAGES 13,149,700 14,574,663 17.456,000 18,530,000 21,229,000 (a)
-------------------------------------------------------_________
2. RETIREMENT 2,191,566 1,961,706 2,496,000 3,384,000 3,035,000 (a)
3. WORKERS CON? .186,000 134,000 155,000 155,000 155,000 (al
- 4. UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE I51855 6,155 25,000 25,000 25,000 la)
5. GROUP INSURANCE 1,276,752 1,193,544 1.623,000 1,509,000 1,758,000 (a)
6. UNIFORM RENTAL 51,497 69,191 74,000 84,000 84,000 (a)
---_____________________________________________________________
7. TOTAL BENEFITS 3,721,470 3,364,596 4.373,000 5,157,000 5,057,000 (a)
---_____________________________________________________________
r
26,286,000
8. SALARIES, WAGES, 6 BENEFITS 16 1........ ......... .......... . .......... ..........
9. DIRECT CHARGES-CORF/DIST (2,249,960) (2,652,380) (3,172,000) (3,500,000) (4,000,000)
10. COST ALLOC-CORF/DIST (1,791,523) (1,832,420) (2,500,000) (2,500,000) (3,000,000)
.................................................�...._.______
1l. N.O. SALARIES 6 BENEFITS (4,041,483) (4,484,800) (5,672,000) (6,000,000) (7,000.000) (b)
- __ ............................
.. 12. NET J.O. PAYROLL 12,829,687 13,454,459 16,157,000 17,617,000 19,206,000 (c)
...............................................................
13. MATERIALS, SUPPLIES, 6 SERVICES
.. _______________________________
14. GASOLINE, DIESEL 6 OIL 203,102 220,292 215.000 250,000 250,000 (d)
15. INSURANCE 857,352 553,131 585,000 600,000 600,000 (a)
16. MEMBERSHIPS 14,742 15,580 25,000 30,000 30,000 (f)
17. OFFICE EXPENSE
Ia. SUPPLIES 96,092 92,D67 100,000 110,000 120,000 (g)
.. 19. OTHER 49,510 61,795 75,000 55,000 65,000 (g)
20. OPERATING SUPPLIES
Ynl
21. CHLORINE 6 ODOR CONTROL 1,804,810 1,966,235 1,995,000 2,100,000 2,400,000 (h)
,,. 22. SULFIDE CONTROL 605,154 565,403 618,000 1,000,000 900,000 (h)
23. CHEMICAL COAGULANTS 1.833,150 2,062,688 2,035,000 2,587,000 2,370,000 (i)
24. LAB CHEMICALS 6 SUPPLIES 83,529 158,529 180,000 140,000 186,000 (j)
25. TOOLS 75,943 82,419 70,000 85,000 95,000 1j)
.. 26. SOLVENTS, PAINTS, 6 JAN. SUPPLIES 94,562 99,SIB 120,000 150,000 150,000 (j)
27. OTHER OPERATING SUPPLIES 198,576 153,105 184,000 200,000 215,000 (j)
JOINT RORKS OPERATING BUDGET SCHEDULE III lJ
JOINT OPERATING 6 WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS 5/11/90
1990-91 FISCAL YEAR
� I
1987-BB 1988-89 1989-90 1989-90 1990-91 r
ACTUAL ACTUAL PROJECTED BUDGET RECOMMEND
----------------------------------------------------------------
6r
28. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
29. GBOUMDSKEEPING 42,975 44,618 65,000 100,000 125,000 (k) y
30. OUTSIDE LAS SERVICES 15,903 115,711 00,000 400,000 404,000 (k)
31. SOLIDS REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL 2,767,538 4,653,931 5,200,000 5,500,000 6,000,000 (k)
32. OTHER HASTE DISPOSAL 25,910 25,236 28,000 105,000 190,000 (k)
r
33. OXYGEN PLANT OPEN 6 NICE 0 0 180,000 400,000 420,000 (k)
34. OTHER 240,114 273,394 273,000 235,000 778,000 (k) lJ
35. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
36. GENERAL, LABOR 6 SPECIAL COUNSEL 267,496 326,028 395,000 275,000 650,000 (1) r'
37. AUDIT 6 ACCOUNTING 19,970 22,621 25,000 25,000 27,000 (1) j
38. ENGINEERING 39,201 0,237 30,000 50,000 75,000 (1) 4u
39. OTHER 139,833 175,696 220,000 180,000 525,000 (1)
v
40. PRINTING 6 PUBLICATION
41. REPRO-IN-HOUSE 76,543 95,683 110,000 100,000 140,000 (m)
42. PRINTING-OUTSIDE 49,214 28,247 60,000 50,000 100,000
43. PHOTO PROCESSING 19,773 15,887 22,000 20,000 25,000 (A) r
44. NOTICES 6 ADS 26,243 54,294 75,000 75,000 85,000
u
45. RENTS 6 LEASES
46. OUTSIDE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 63,645 71,237 100,000 100,000 120,000 (n) y
47. DISTRICT EQUIPMENT RENTAL 105,864 113,972 115,060 100,000 125.000 (n)
48. REPAIRS 6 MAINTENANCE
49. MATERIALS 2.755,442 3,241,500 3,211,000 3,600.000 3,600,000 (o)
lu
50. CONTRACTS 123,602 71,767 150,000 165,000 195,000 (o)
51. RESEARCH 6 MONITORING
u
52. OCEAN MONITORING 1,759,596 2,314,126 1,700,000 1,700,000 2.104,000 (p)
53. OCEAN/I.H./OPER RESEARCH 184,303 196,524 340,000 370,000 590,000 (p) u
60
r JOINT NORMS OPERATING BUDGET SCHEDULE III
JOINT OPERATING 6 WORMING CAPITAL FUNDS 5I11190
1990-91 FISCAL YEAR
r
1907.08 1988-89 1989-90 1989-90 1990.91
ACTUAL ACTUAL PROJECTED BUDGET RECOMMEND
................................................................
r
51. TRAINING, MEETINGS, 6 TRAVEL 5A,051 82,07/ 124,000 125,000 115,000 (0)
55. UNCOLLECTABLE ACCOUNTS 0 257 0 2,000 2,000 (r)
r 56. UTILITIES
57. DIESEL FOR GENERATORS 116,270 107,911 90,000 200,000 200,000 (s)
58. POWER 3,993,300 4,446,142 4,641,000 6,500,000 5,700.000 (s)
59. NATURAL GAS 113,916 123.930 100,000 250,000 175,000 (s)
60. TELEPHONE 105,982 103,351 100.000 120,000 120,000 (s)
r 61. WATER 92.332 102,160 120,000 150,000 150,000 (s)
62. OTHER EXPENSES
r 63. FREIGHT 35,491 41,283 40,000 40,000 45,000 (t)
64. GENERAL 221,745 271.927 280,000 275,000 300,000 (t)
65. RIND OPERATING FEES 0 67,330 210,ODO 250,000 300,000 (t)
66. PRIOR YEARS EXPENSE 15,546 250,618 30,000 50,000 50,000 (u)
67. OTHER WON-OPERATING EXPENSE 41,805 46,411 40,000 45,000 45,000 (v)
r -----------_____________________________________________________
68. TOTAL MAIL, SUPPLIES, 6 SERVICES 19,514,916 23,502,855 24,356,000 28,894,000 30,921,000
69. COST ALLOCATION-COAF 6 OTHER (299,277) (358,098) (500,000) (350,000) (600,000) IW)
________________________________________________________________
70. NET J.O. NAT'L, SUPPLIES, G SEBV 19,225,639 23,144.757 23,856,000 28,544,000 30,321.000 (x)
r 71. REVENUE (1,482,319) (2,103,387) (2,200,000) (1,700,000) (2,000,000) (Y)
________________________________________________________________
72. NET J.D. EXPENDITURES 30,573,001 34,495,829 37,813,000 44,531,000 47,607,000 (t)
r
V
r
r
r
May 11, 1990 SCHEDULE IV
NOTES TO JOINT OPERATING FUND BUDGET
1990-91 FISCAL YEAR
4 (a) Salaries, Wages and Benefits - See attached Schedule V for
1990-91 salaries and benefits estimates and projected payroll
savings.
Estimated 1989-90 salaries and benefits are below budget
primarily because delayed construction schedules allowed
positions to remain vacant.
.. (b) Cost Allocations and Direct Chargebacks to CORF and
- Individual Districts - Represents direct labor and benefits
chargebacks and cost allocation to the appropriate fund for
which the work is actually performed (CORP for work on
treatment plants' capital expansion; respective Capital
Facilities funds for work on individual District's collection
facilities capital expansion; and Operating funds for
maintenance and repair) . Also reflects administrative time
chargeable to self-funded insurance programs; and Source
Control Division and Laboratory Division charges to respective
Districts for industrial waste monitoring and enforcement
program.
., (c) Net JO Payroll — This line item represents the net salaries,
wages and benefits chargeable to Joint Operating Fund for
administration and maintenance/operation of the joint works
facilities, after chargebacks to other funds for services
performed by the labor pool described above in (b) .
(d) Gasoline, Oil and Fuel - This account includes gasoline, oil
and diesel fuel required to operate stationary treatment
plant equipment as well as approximately 300 pieces of
major mobile equipment such as vehicles, cranes, etc.
.. (e) Insurance - Includes Board and staff out-of-county travel
policy, employee fidelity bond, all-risk (earthquake and
flood) policy, fire, boiler and machinery policies. The major
elements of this account are $323,000 for $35 million in
coverage provided by the comprehensive all-risk policy and
$258,000 for in-lieu premiums to increase the reserve levels
`. in the self-insured public liability fund pursuant to the
Boards' decision to fully self-insure liability risk.
.. (f) Memberships - Districts' memberships in Association of
Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) , California Association
of Sanitation Agencies (CASA) , Santa Ana River Flood
Protection Agency (SARFPA) , and Long Beach Safety Council.
.. (g) office Expense - This account includes supplies, forms, small
office equipment, drafting materials; technical journals and
�, postage for all departments.
Schedule IV
Page 2
bw
(h) Chlorine a Odor Control Chemicals - The Districts presently
use chlorine, and sodium hydroxide (caustic soda) as primary
odor control chemicals in the treatment plants. Usage of „
chlorine is expected to remain at 1989-90 levels during the year It
but unit prices have increased. Caustic soda use in the foul
air scrubbers at both plants however, is expected to increase
over 50% as new scrubbers are placed into service. Caustic � 1
soda is also added to trunklines to control hydrogen sulfide
in the lines, and $237,000 has been added to the chemical
budget for the Joint Works, share of this expense for the in
plant odor control benefits.
Ferrous chloride use, required to control hydrogen sulfide
levels in our digester gas as required by AQMD Rule 431.1,
will decrease by slightly, partially as a result of increased
ferric chloride for physical/chemical treatment.
During the course of this year, we expect to optimize use of
the various odor control chemicals, but expect our overall
usage levels and budget requirements to remain high as we
maintain compliance with increasingly stringent air quality , I
regulations. V
(i) Chemical Coagulants - We expect that the increased polymer
usage level increase in 1990-91 result in a increase of yj
$69,000 for the material. Polymer is added to the influent
wastewater along with ferric chloride via the physical/ „
chemical treatment systems at both plants to improve solids L
removal efficiencies in the primary clarifier basins. It is
also added to digested sludge prior to dewatering to cause the
sludge to coagulate to improve the sludge and water separation
process. �r
Ferric chloride is used as a backup chemical in the event the
primary chemical distribution systems are out of service for
repairs or maintenance, but primarily for enhanced primary
physical/chemical clarifier performance. Physical/chemical
treatment systems were fully installed and operational at both
plants this past year, and we expect to decrease our budgeted 6+
use of ferric chloride in these systems by $76,000. A portion
of ferric chloride costs are included in the odor control i '
chemical category to account for this additional benefit from L
its use.
(j ) Other Operating Supplies - Miscellaneous items such as
scrubber acids, activated carbon, solvents, cleaners,
hardware, janitorial supplies, tools, laboratory supplies,
etc. required to operate and maintain existing and expanding
facilities.
Schedule IV
.r
Page 3
.. (k) Contractual Services - The major component of this category is
sludge removal and disposal. Contracts have been executed
with Recyc Inc. , Pima Gro and Curti Enterprise for
agricultural reuse of residual solids. The Coyote Canyon
landfill was closed this past year and no replacement site
has yet been approved within the county. A total of $6 million
has been budgeted for solids removal and disposal.
This account also includes appropriations for groundskeeping
services, toxics removal services, outside laboratory
services, trash pickup, plant site sweeping, data processing
system maintenance and support services, and temporary help
- - to level out periodic increases in staff workload and
staffing levels. A maintenance and operations contract was
implemented in February for the Plant 2 oxygen generation
_ plant and $420,000 has been budgeted for that service
contract.
.. (1) Professional Services - Includes General Counsel, special
- labor counsel, CPA audit and miscellaneous accounting,
data processing, engineering and other consulting services.
(m) Printing and Publications - Budget allows for in-house and
outside reproduction costs and reflects expanded management
.. information system and increasingly complex administrative
requirements, as well as continuing demand by public and
regulatory agencies for information on Districts' activities.
The continuing efforts of our Public Information Officer (PIO)
to improve our public education program on Districts'
activities is also reflected in the increased budget for this
line item. This account also includes costs of advertisements
�+ and notices in our continuing effort to recruit quality staff
to meet master planned objectives.
(n) Rents and Leases - This account includes cost accounting
system charges to the Joint Operating Fund for Districts-owned
equipment, and outside equipment rental for major equipment
used for emergency repairs. The 1990-91 allocation has been
increased slightly to reflect the increased usage levels of
large equipment required over the past four years to
support major repairs and maintenance in our upgraded and
,. expanded facilities.
(o) Repairs and Maintenance - This item, which is for parts and
services for repair of plant facilities, reflects an
" authorization to allow for routine equipment maintenance.
. . Should this level allocation prove to be insufficient in the
event of major unexpected equipment failures and/or repairs, a
transfer from the unappropriated reserves of the individual
Districts would be necessary to meet the increased obligation.
r
V
Schedule IV
Page 4
(p) Research and Monitoring - $2,000,000 in this account is for
contract services to carry out the extensive ocean monitoring
program required by EPA Region IX under the provisions of the
Districts' NPDES permit, which became effective April 1, 1985.
The account includes the Districts' contribution to the u
Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP)
being conducted under a joint powers agreement with other
Southern California municipal dischargers, and also provides
for some operational research and evaluation to develop
optimum operating parameters in the treatment plants.
(q) Training. Meetings and Travel'- Expanding activities of
regulatory agencies have required increased Board member and
staff travel in recent years. It is expected that
considerable travel will continue to be required in connection
with our continued efforts to obtain an extension of our
NPDES permit conditions. Also includes ongoing technical
training and materials for staff, expansion of our supervisory
training program to help provide supervisors with the
necessary training to more effectively manage their Divisional
groups, and required training for new computerized control
systems and other "high tech" equipment. r
(r) Uncollectible Accounts - For miscellaneous accounts that are
determined by the General Counsel and Director of Finance to
be uncollectible.
(s) Utilities - The $5.7 million allocation for purchased power in I �
this item reflects an $800,000 decrease from 1989-90 budgeted
levels due to lower than anticipated requirements of additional
air scrubbers, electric motors at the new Ocean Outfall Booster
Station, and avoidance of peak-demand hours for electrical
equipment.
(t) Other Operating Expenses - Expenses not chargeable elsewhere,
such as freight and miscellaneous items, and annual permit
renewal fees and penalties assessed by the SCAQMD.
(u) Expenses Applicable to Prior Years - Represents adjustments 10
to an operating or non-operating account balance from previous
years.
(v) Other Non-Operating Expenses - Miscellaneous items not
chargeable elsewhere.
i
(w) Cost Allocation and Direct Chargebacks to CORP and Individual
Districts - For materials, supplies and services cost
allocation and chargebacks for same purposes as described
above under (b) . r
u
u
Schedule IV
` Page 5
r+ (x) Net JO Materials, Supplies and Services - This line item
represents the net materials, supplies and services chargeable
-- to the Joint Operating Fund for administration and maintenance
„y and operation of the Joint Works Facilities, after chargebacks
to other funds.
(y) Net Revenues - Budget amount is for sales of various sewage
treatment process by-products, revenues from the wastehauler
_ disposal facilities at Plant No. 1, sampling chargebacks to
individual Districts, and miscellaneous items.
(z) Net JO Requirements - This line item represents the net Joint
Operating Requirements after reduction of the Total Joint
Operating Requirements by the revenues generated from sale of
by-products, charges to other agencies, and other
_ miscellaneous operating revenues.
`Y
r
r
ti
r
r
r
r
JOINT OPERATING FUND Schedule V
(AND WORKING CAPITAL REVOLVING FUND) 5/11/90
.d PROJECTED SALARIES & BENEFITS
1990-91
.d
- Anticipated
At Full Payroll Recommended
Employment Savin s Budget
SALARIES & WAGES 23,853,000 2,624,000 21,229,000 (1
r
BENEFITS:
1. Retirement 3,410,000 375,000 3,035,000 (2a
2. Workers' Compensation 155,000 -0- 155,000 (2b
3. Unemployment Insurance 25,000 -0- 25,000 (2c
4. Group Medical
., - Self-Funded (includes 1,405,000 141,000 1,264,000 (2d
transfers)
- HMO 403,000 40,000 363,000
- Disability 81,000 8,000 73,000
- Life 64,000 6,000 58,000
S. Uniforms 92,000 8,000 84,000 (2e
6. Total Benefits 5,635,000 578,000 5,057,000
„ TOTAL SALARIES, 29,488,000 3,202,000 26,286,000
WAGES & BENEFITS
NOTES:
1) Salaries & Wages - Full employment projection based on the
assumption that all 626 authorized permanent positions and the 44
Summer Work Program positions are filled as set forth in the personnel
recommendations. Because of our ability to sometimes temporarily
v, minimize staffing by adjusting plant operational modes, personnel
turnover and strict controls on filling vacancies, we have targeted
our payroll cost at $26.3 million next year (10.9% over the 1989-90
budget) which will realize a payroll savings of $3,202,000. If,
however, turnover and vacancies are lower, it may be necessary to
allocate additional funds from the unappropriated reserve accounts of
the individual Districts.
2) Benefits - Remarks above under Salaries and Wages regarding full
employment of authorized positions also apply to benefits.
(a) Retirement - The Districts' employees are members of the
Orange County Employees Retirement System pursuant to our MOU's.
1 '
r
SCHEDULE V
Page 2 ) I
w
(b) Workers' Compensation - Amount includes total estimated
expenditures for the workers' compensation program set forth
in detail in the enclosed Workers' Compensation Self-Insured
Fund Budget on Schedule VI. An appropriation of $155,000 ' !
is recommended for 1990-91 to maintain the current level of r
accumulated reserves as recommended by the Fiscal Policy
Committee. 11
(c) Unemployment Insurance - The Districts are on an actual r
claim basis because of favorable history and only $25,000 in
contributions were required for the last year. We anticipate if
making similar contributions in 1990-91. r
(d) Group Medical - Includes the Districts' share of employee I ;
medical plan benefits for the prepaid HMO plans, the estimated w
total costs of the self-funded indemnity plan and the life and
disability insurance premiums. Schedule VII details the 1 �
expected costs of the self-funded plan and the last of three r
annual increased employee contributions included in current MOUs.
The recommended budget increase reflects our increased staffing
level as well as increased costs. 11
r
(a) Uniforms - This budget projection is in accordance with
employee MOU's. We have again been able to obtain favorable ) !
bids for uniform rental, and the unit costs of uniform service r
have not increased for several years.
11
r
1 �
r
1 !
r
r
I �
r
1 +
lr
Y
�.i
JOINT MONKS OPERATING BUDGET
WORKERS' COMPENSATION SXLP-INSURED rUND SCHEDULE VI
1990-91 PISCAL YEAR 5/1/90
1989-90 1990-91
1989-90 ESTIMATED RECOMMENDED
EXPENDITURES BUDGET EXPENDITURES BUDGET
1. galaxies, Wages and Benefits 16,000 15,336 17,000
2. Benefits/Claims 110,000 107,496 110,000
3. Contractual Services 13,000 12,650 16,000
4. Legal Services 5,000 0 3,000
5. Professional Services 25,000 25,337 30,000
S. Supplies A Other 1,000 6,422 7,000
7. Sub-Total 170.000 167.241 183,000
B. Excess Lose Policy 40,000 31,835 35,000
9. Total Expenditures 210,OVU 199,076 218,000
REVENUES A RESERVES
10. In-Lieu Premiums 155,000 155,000 155,000
11. Interest A Miscellaneous 55,000 62,968 63,000
12. Total Revenues 210,000 217,968 218,000
12. Excess Revenue (Expenditures) 0 18,892 0
13. Reserves and Transfers 699,000 677.487 696,000
14. Ending Reserve. 699,000 696,379 696,000
WCDUD90.XLS-5/9/90
JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET
SELF-FUNDED HEALTH PLAN TRUST FUND SCHEDULE VII
1990-91 FISCAL YEAR 5/1/90
1989-90 1990-91 EST. 90-91 1990-91
1989-90 ESTIMATED AT FULL PAYROLL RECOMMENDED
EXPENDITURES BUDGET MENDITURE9 EMPLOYMENT SAVINGS BUDGET
___________ ---------- ------------ ___________ ____________
1. Clalse - Medical 940,000 780.516 1,D51,000 (105,000) 946,000
2. - Disability 28,000 6.009 0 0 a
3. - Lang Teti Disability 90,000 11,806 0 0 0
4. - Dental 189.000 153,792 190,000 (20,000) 170,000
5. Sub-Total 1,247,D00 952,123 1,241,000 (125,000) 1,116,000
7. Contractual Services 42,000 40,313 53,000 (5,000) 48,000
S. Stop Lose Insurance 84,000 78,922 111,000 (11,000) 100,000
8. Total Expenditures 1,373,000 1,D71,358 1,405,000 (141,000) 1,264,000
REVENUES A RESERVES
9. In-Lieu Presiuss Fros - CSDOc 1.001,000 701,393 877,000 (86,000) 792,000
- Roployee 154,000 137,346 210,000 (20,000) 190,000
10. Interest A Miscellaneous 0 2,578 0 0 0
11. Reieburse Pros Stop Lose Ins. 0 25,229 0 0 0
12. Total Revenue 1,155,000 866,546 1,087,000 (105,000) 982.000
13. Excess Revenue (Expenditures) (218,000) (204,812) (318,000) 36,000 (282,000)
14. Transfers 223,000 336,260 318,000 (36,000) 282,000
15. Beginning Reserves 155,000 24,283 156,000 156,000
16. Ending Reaerve9 160.000 155,731 156,000 0 156,000
SFEUD90.XL5-5/17/90
JOINT BORES OPMTING BUDGET
PUBLIC LIABILITY SELF-INSURED FUND SCHEDULE VIII
1990-91 FISCAL TEAM, 5/07/89 2
_ 1989-90 1990-91
1959-90 ESTIMATED Rzcom E "
EEPENDITURES BUDGET EXPENDITURES BUDGET
1. Salaries, was" atM Benefits 1,000 0 1,000
2. Benefita/claim 20,000 13,582 20,000
3. contractual Services 8,000 4,776 7,000
A. Legal Services 25.000 28,356 33,000
5. Professional Services 1.000 0 1,000
6. Supplies A Other 1,000 1.227 2,000
7. Sub-Total 56,000 47.9/1 66,000 ,
8. Este.. We. Polity 265,000 265,000
9. Total Expandituraa 321,000 57,911 329,000
REVENUES A RESERVES
10. In-Lieu Premium 258.000 258.000 258.000
11. Interest A Miacallansous 120,000 143.360 140,000
12. Allocation to Other Funds 0 0 0
12. Total Revenue. 378.000 407.360 398,000
12. Exc... Revenue (Expenditures) 57.000 359,419 69,000
13. Reserves and Transfer* 1.648,000 1,513,403 1,903.000
14. Ending Reserve. 1,705,000 1,902,822 1,972,000
PLBUD90.XL5-5/9/90
- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF
ORANGE COUNTY
JOINT WORKS CAPITAL OUTLAY
REVOLVING FUND
PsilATip^
.� 9 topolitan p �ls
U
— � Since 195t*
BINGE COON
1990-1991 FISCAL YEAR
CORF A.XLS
5/15/90 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SCHEDULE A
SUMMARY OF DISTRICT'S REQUIREMENTS
AND COMPARISON TO LAST YEAR
A B C D E F
1990-91 1990-91 BUDGET 1989-90
PRELIHI14ARY COMPARABLE
DISTRICT EQUITY BUDGET BEGINNING GRANT BUDGET
PERCENT REQUIREMENTS RESERVES FUNDS REQUIREMENTS
1 9.98% 10,321,000 (b) 8,739,000 100,000 10,252,000 (b)
2 28.66% 29,641,000 (a) 30,362,000 287,000 29,441,000 (a)
3 31.26% 32,330,000 (a) 40.450,000 313,000 32,112,000 (a)
5 4.80% 4,964,000 (b) 2,404,000 48,000 4,931,000 (b)
6 5.33% 5,512,000 (b) 4,250,000 53,000 5,475,000 (b)
7 7.54% 7,798,000 (a) 14,910,000 75,000 7.745,000 (a)
11 6.60% 6.826,000 (b) 2.514,000 • 66,000 6,780,000 (b)
13 0.26% 269,000 7,736,000 3,000 267,000
14 5.57% 5,761,000 (c) 56.000 5,722,000 (c)
TOTAL 100.00% 103,422,000 111,365,000 1.000.000 1 L 102,725,000
• Includes sale of capacity in Slater System to District 3 approved May 9, 1990
(a) Long-range financial projections indicate these Districts may need to issue debt in 1990-91
(b) Long-range financial projections indicate these Districts will need to issue debt in 1990-91
(c) Fonds will be provided by required deposits from IRWD
1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1
S/11/90 CAPITAL OUTLAY RIVOLwIKO IONO SCw1UUL1 Bd
BONNAIT Of DD117 Hilo CONSTIOCTION IIIOIIININTS Pepe 1
19f0.1191 TO 1999-2000
A B C D I I a I I a 1 A
0116 TOTAL INTIIID Split 1NTINATID ligillfD 1171471D ISTI4710 12f1PeTgP IITIGTIO pill IST1mafID 1f9 Calf t0
PWPeCT ima P1011Cf say C.I.P. leasNT BIDGI7 BBOG17 Ilea" BOeONT IIAI BODGIT is AS CONPLISI
1919.90 1990.11 6/30/90 1190-91 1391-92 199E-94 1191.14 1394-95 TOTAL 1995.2000 TOTAL HURTS
........... ............................ ................................................................. '......---....--------................. ............
I. lee led tetidgeted Major Projects
A. lecillitlre Halt 1
1. Keadverla 10.2 1 Plat 10.1, PI.20/PI.31 31,455,000 31,206,116 31,701,126 500,001 560,006 500,001
1. wsatebealer Disposal A People Ste PI.21d/213 3,010,123 2,040,423 500,001 500,000 1,000,000 1,000,000
3. Primary C1¢1f1ari Not. 6.15, P143 10,111,000 f1,769,972 13,719,111 17,000,006 10,000,000 1,000,000 26,000,000 21,001,040
/. oil ludiire facilities, PI-31-1 12,920,006 14,416,911 2,411,110 7,010,000 3,000,000 12,000,000 12,000,000
5. little Bredliag facilities, fl.34-2 21,500,000 20,021,504 6,171,501 11000,004 6.000,000 250,000 11,250,000 14,250,000
6. Digesters 11.16. PI-H-3 25,110,000 32,001,665 1,665 71000,000 151000,000 10,000.000 32,000,000 32,004,000
7. Iobabllltittea of Digesters 7 11, PI.35.1 2,593,000 11311,109 21211,109 $6,001 50,000 $1,000
1. lebebllltitlo0 of Digesters 9 A 10, PI.35.2 3,510,000 1,500,000 500,000 1,500,400 1,500,000 3,516,000 3,500,000
9. SecneOary Trot Sipaoslva to 10 BID, PI.36 21,01,100 31,161,015 64,015 6001000 715001ODD 13,000,000 10,000,000 31,100,000 31,101,000
It. P[Imary Treotmeat 12 No tmpaelloo, 11.37 32,500,000 34,100,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 19,600,001 12,000,o01 1,100,000 31,000,000 34,000,006
11. Nile. Nodlflcetiol, Pt-31 10,063,211 3,211 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,6//,101 1,000,006 16,000,000 14,000,000
12. Security A saadeceplog, PI.31.1 1,100,000 500,001 1,000,000 300,000 1,100,000 1,800,411
13. tsrtbpoate Work, PI.36-2 1,900,000 t00,o60 1150010DO 1,100,000 1,900,006
If. seismic Opgradleg I stractural wort, PI.31-3 3,010,660 3,000,000 700,000 2,000,000 300,000 3,000,001 1,006,040
15. fuel writes Peproveleats, 1.033-1 170,041 222,131 22,111 200,000 200,000 101,061
16. to KID Orygoo Activated Sledge A DAVs i5,163,000 66,000,000 1,116,000 1,000,000 ntool,000
17. Belt freseee (/ Will 14,300,000 15,500,000 500,000 2,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 15,500,001 15,501,040
11. solids storage 19 Biagi 16,171,000 11,000,000 6,010,000 1'000,006 $,000,000
It. Digesters: 21110' Director 9,100,001 9,200,000 1,000,160 3,210,000 1,201,001 7,460,000 1,600,000 1,100,000
20. Stsadby Power 0entrctloa 7,73S,000 7,715,000 2,100,000 S,435,000 7,735,000 7,135,400
21. Site Ilectrical Power Distribution 2,477,000 2,600,106 600,004 100,000 2,610,"0 2,I00,ODO
22. Ilectriflcetloe Project 2,101,000 2,250,000 200,000 113/0,000 751,000 2,250,000 2,250,000
23. Bee Sewage leergency Bypass 1,991,000 1,000,060 2,000,000 2,000,000
21. Veers Triclliag filters 1 A 3 1,300,000 1,300,606 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,)00,000
25. Coutril Air Compressor Stories 250,000 250,016 $1,000 200,000 151,001 150,000
26. Nile. Projects 10,0001 coo 10,ISO oil ISO 0001,000,oil I,IS$ DID 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,010,coo 5,600,000 10,000,000
/18-TOTAL - IICLANATION PLANT 1 321,811,000 161,501,S6f 6i,166,S6f 15,650,110 Sf,IS0,110 51,100,111 19,011,016 11,715,000 211rf3f,000 17,161,600 131,335,001 /1,001,000
r
CAPITAL ODTWT INVOLVING IUD SCRIDOLI 9-1
BOXIIAII Of MISS VOIXB COIIIIDCTION IIQUIUMIITC Pape 2
1590-1991 TO 1999-2000
A B C D I I G B T I I L
0110 TOTAL ASPIRIN IDEAL ISTIMATID I1QWRID ISTIMITIO IBTIWTID IIT1nTID 117likTiD fill nHOT1O 1n Met 10
PROJECT 1s? PIOJICT In C.I.P. MOUNT BODGIT Blocs? AUDIT BBWIT Told low yN MQLnf
1969-90 199041 1130190 1190-91 1551-22 1991-93 1993-91 1194.95 TOTAL 1195-2000 TOTAL PIOJnn
----------- ---------------------------- '........................-........------..--..................... ............-............-............. -----------
B. Treatmedt Pint 2
1. Support facilities and Bite Imnavemts
a. Operations Balldiag, P3-23-5-1 3,125,001 3,n5,000 25,060 100,010 2,000,000 1,500,100 3,600,000 3,600,000
I. Welcome Bulldiag, P2-35.2 4,950,001 5,261,000 14,000 250,000 1,n0,000 3,000,000 1,000,000 5,250,000 5,250,000
c. Maintenance Balldinp , lb35.3 1,200,000 5,211,000 11,000 250,000 1,000,000 3,000,000 1.040,000 5,250,000 S,250,000
I. Cnstrntlom Macanmelt Office, P2.35•1 I,LI,000 1,302,n0 14,000 500,000 100,000 11,000 1,288,000 11268,000
e. Phase II Bite and 9ecurily Isprneseats, 12-35-5 1,300,000 2,315,000 5,000 100,000 1,300,000 900,000 21300,000 2,300,000
2. Nice Mod. L laprneseats to facilities, I2.37 1,162,000 6,154,000- 7,158,001 1,000,001 1,000,000 1,000,000
3. leash Digester I, J. 1, P2.39.1 2,650,000 3,312,000 387,010 11500,001 11500,000 3,000,000 3,000,000
1. Rehab Digester L, N, PZ-39-2 1,161,000 3,000,000 1,001,000 2,001,000 3,000,000 3,000,000
5. Rehab Digester A. 0, 12.39.3 1,761,000 4,000,000 210001000 21000,000 1,000,ODD 1,000,060
6. Process control loptovesests, P2-10 210,000 431,010 111,001 250,000 250,000 250,000
7. Primary}testiest 21 BED Redwine, P2.11 11,300,060 15,001,000 I5100610n 15,000,000
1. Secondary Treatment Nepsssies, P242 10,400,140 21,214,000 214,001 2,000,000 1,000,000 12,000,060 1,000,100 21,000,000 21,000,000
9. Ilectrlficetion Project, PI.12.1 6,500,000 14,100,000 1,600,000 6,000,000 5,100,000 11,000,000 14,000,000
10. Kite. Xodificitiaas, P2.13-1 3,509,000 9,001 500,000 1,000,000 2,000,no 31500.000 1,540,000
It. larth0aale Vorl, P2-13-2 3,000,000 500,48 1,506,100 1,000,000 3,000,000 3,110,000
12. raise lc Opprading 1 Structural lark, P2-13-3 4,305,000 4,305,000 705,100 1,000,000 1,600,000 1,303,000 4,305,006
13. nAltollDiMutfal System, PHI 5,330,000 1,010,000 10,000 2.001,000 1,500,400 500,101 4,000,000 4,011,000
II. net System Impractical,, 1-033.2 170,600 263,000 113,000 150,000 150,000 150,000
15. Standby lover Gemafmlln 9,206,000 1,200,000 9,200,000 1,200,000
16. Solid, storage: 2 Slat 5,200,000 5,1Do,0o0 100,000 2,405,001 2,400,000 5,200.000 54200,000
17. Additlooal IDS lot Digester 3,695,000 i3OD0,000 21000,010 21000,800 2,000,000
Is. Potable Vale[ Dimtribitlom System 3,809,010 3,800,000 300,000 300,000 3,500,000 3,000,000
19. Plant Voter Pump statics 1,170,100 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,DDo
20. Misc. Projects 10,000,000 10,400,000 400,001 1,000,000 1,600,000 1,000,000 1,100,00o 1,000,000 5,BOB Doi 5,Doe 000 10,000 DO
---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---.....
.- --------.. ..-------- ------.--.. .--------- -----...... ----------
SOS-fITll • 71Witl1IT PWIT 3 In,152,000 I25,111,000 I,S//,001 11,305,000 21,500,000 16,/00,000 9,101,001 3,III,o00 11,3f3,000 1S,f00,0o0 125,211,001 2,000,000
WITAL oALAI IIHLVies IW SCHOOLS 1.1
SOWIT of JOINT SOW ColAsOAiol liguimiA1 Pqe 3
1990-Iffl To I991-E004
1 B C 0 I I 6 1 1 J 1 L
DAIS MAL II/IIID Tom IAWTes "QuIllb IAIATID IOTIAHP SA UDH ISTIUHD fill 191IH/11 111 COLS 70
PIOJIA IS? FROJIA 197 C.I.P. BHGIT BODGR IOOGA IIOGIT AH1y /IA IOOGIf flu COIPLIti
Ifl!-90 I110-11 6131199 THIN-11 11l1-1E ISHdI 1S11-fl I911.15 TALL I115-3061 "?At PIOJICT9
C. 1@claiation ?lost lite,
1. llte Acguilltiot 15,101,001 5,001,001 5,010,100 5,010,160 5,004,001
1. teclaiation Plait 7 63,061,001 11,006,106 100,060 1,941,100 16,116,111 25,101,001 15,000,000 61,000,100 61,001,010
HI-TOTAL - IICLWTI01 PLAAI 71,000,000 16 0" 000 51100,100 E f01 600 11,041,101 25,100,001 15,G01,601 0,146,4111 61,000,041
D. Ialerpint aid Joint facilities
1. loterplesl feclllter, 1-9
4. 130. mterpleot line 27,606,101 11,015,100 15,000 1,600,000 11,004,000 1,111,100 E1,001,000 E4,001,010
I. mlerplait Utility C6es@ 1,040,000 6,60f,000 1,000,000 3,600,000 1,001,000 1,640,140 6,600,010
C. Industrial peter Lite 110,010 1,050,000 1,000,100 2,000,001 3,110,460 3,066,000
d. Digester Cis Lime 100,000 1.000.040 500,000 501,000 1,000,010 1,041,401
e. Coaiunailioes Cable 120,000 1E6,000 100,000 10,000 110,1/0 116,111
3. Support facilities sod Site Iaproeemb
a. Akio. 1111dleg lapis. L lelab., J-7-1, J-7-5 1,740,006 5,151'155 4,151'155 1,000,000 1,140,411 1,101,411
b. lebob/Cone lest Lin to office at At 1, 1-11-1 900,000 1,051,115 1,115 51,000 1,006,400 l,IS1,6/1 1,150,100
a Ceslnl Laboratory, 1-17 1,711,140 7,591,411 399,411 4,000,040 1,000,000 E10,100 7,216,411 1,261,000
d. tuelanefltlm[eesne Bldg,. 6 Oil Dnl, J-11 3,114,1es 11151153f 31551,536 E61,161 E00,010 361,1es
I. Operitioal/Central Center, J-13-1-1 1,570,410 1,11l,001 l(1,006 1,510,001 3,500,101 $40,000 4.501,600 1,510,101
1. farnoeeel Balldlop At Ill 1, J-E6 111,001 1,102,611 1,615 100,001 500,101 400,100 1,001,101 1,600,114
9. Demolltlol of Support Bslldip at Plait 3, J-27 51.611 1,611 50,661 50,000 51.004
1. Central Generation Hcliitl
s. Inelastic !repatriate, J-111 11,000,000 20,107,111 10,807,111 5,000,000 1,014,000 1,040,660 1,601,661 1,111,000 9,000,000 1,400,100 10,000,110
b. Wailes Patches@, J-I11 1,054,000 3,731,130 3,733,130
C. Plant I Facility, Ja9.1 15,100,000 16125,1E3 1,135,13E 6,000,000 1,004,000 1,010,010 15,000,/10 15,000,000
d. Plant 1 facility, J-H-3 35,71f,000 30,561,15! 1,541,151 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,040,000 16,010,100 11,000,001
1. Waite Gas Ann, J-11, MIA 762,004 100,41) 50,413 650,000 650,001 650,000
S. Oulfill I Bonier Pulp 9Fatloll
a. leplaceent of 111 Oulfatl Bever, J-33-1 IL@id1 2,020,000 1,001,561 1,011,561 1,000,000 111/01100 1,014,006
b. leplace OOtfill go. 1 Laid Section, J-37-1 3,111,000 2,500,000 500,100 1,000,001 2,500,000 2,116,010
C. it. Sorge Tots" am. 1, J-EI-3 1,300,004 1,000,000 1,004,006 1,660,406 4,001,040 1,040,101
d. ?tip CA ltitioa fat O tfall la. 1 2,604,001 3,600,000 2,604,040 2,611,110
e. Seemed Discharge leader HIS eC 1,164,001 1,000,001 460,100 401,016 3,616,000 4,161,066
f. [trend 711 to Deep later llte III, Otlfill l6,311,000 40,000,000 31,101,144 31,061,001 11,110,000
6. Itllwent flouter aid Test Pacility,J-31/I4A/11B 500,001 571,606 A,606 511,100 500,011 511,610
7. Prepllnlon of 0lilily Atlas, J-E5 2,500,000 $00,000 1,000,000 1,101,000 2,500,104 2,501,401
1. feleplooeftelnelq/laiilariag 1"estina 3,040,000 561,011 500,006 2,461,006 ],ISO,$$$ 3,011,401
1. ltlnless0ce Nnlgesesl Computer pates 901,0D1 511,011 111,011 960,111
11. Bombard Interplial Trost leplicetait 26,370,100 30,010,110 1,110,100 5,0001001 15,100,041 21,00,111 9,009,111 11,601,411
11. Iieclricil Power $Maim Ielabililatics Lhdies 3,000,0/0 4,110,000 101,010 1,000,000 1,100,000 3,300,001 2,060,041 I,H1,110
R. Sludge Disposal Irolecn
1. Compost OelAnaitiO3 Plitt 1,000,000 1,000,100 2,100,000 6,300,000 9,000,040 1,010,000
b. Lind Acgulsiliom EE,010,000 23,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 2,101,060 31,000.000 23,000,000
c. Landfill De@elopaeat Phase 1 20,600,000 20,600,000 13,010,400 13,000,000 15,600,000
d. Compost Facility 50,100,000 50,100,000 5,011,010 5,040,000 15,360,000
13, 111c Projects S 000 000 10 100 IOU 100 000 1.000.00 1.000.000 1.000.000 1.000.000 1.000.000 5.000.040 5.100.001 11,110,000
SU-TAAL - il7I1PLSA I JOINT 116,Hi,001 111,E61,iA 31,S11,t1E 11,156,001 51,110,000 13,610,40/ If,300,001 E1,701,D00 IIf,110,001 12,311,000 231,114,000 711H0,001
SOB-TOTAL - nice IIOJICTJ 11f 661 000 f07 fOS ISI 103 701 ISI 19 10f 00o Ili AO 000 I.E 350 100 If ]01 p01 61 I31 000 515 ITS off "1 !16 Oa0 "1 11, 110 Ill III fee
CAPITAL OUTLIT IDVOLVING fast 1CIIDIIN B-I
OMIT or JOIN}WORKS COls?IOCTIOV 1101111M1@1 Pepe /
1990.1191 TO 1999-2000
A 1 C 0 I f G B I J I L
ONTO TOTAL IIVISIS MAL IITIIITID IIguillb If1BAT10 ISTIMATND ESTINA}I0 ISTII)TID full ITIKA}ID }O COS} TO
P103ICT 1ST P10JICT I8} C.LP. INSIST ROBUST ROBUST IDIGIT B000@ TRANS Intel? look COMPLAIN
1919.90 1990-l1 f 10 !0 1910.11 1191.9E 199E-93 1993-91 1991.95 TOTAL :115.2000 PUSH PIOJICTB
2. Special Projects, 80adlec 6 Research
A. Attics Plan - UPPIR Permit Applicalloe $3,000 276,000 156,000 75,000 15,000 110,100 120,000
B. Solids Treltaeat led Disposal Projects
1. Sledge Disposal Projects 116,000 610,000 10,080 25,000 50,006 $0,000 $0,000 $0,010 215,000 373,000 601,000
2. sludge Reese Projects 608,100 25,006 10,000 $0,000 50,000 $0,000 225,000 375,000 140,000
C. Beep Ouse Disposal Evaluation 509,000 2,221,004 $71,000 50,000 110,001 250,000 250,000 250,001 950,10 711,000 1,650,001
D. Air Quality Control Program 3,500,000 3,500,000 3,500,000
1. Air Toaice inveatory 102561 V/ TRIP) 100,000 1,975,000 175,001 1,000,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,600,080 1,110,500
2. VOC/IOU 1ACT Deloastretioa Progr i 250,000 600,000 50,001 100,000 150,000 111,100 156,000 610,000 100,000
3. ?store Projects 3,100,001 3,500,001 3,500,000
1. Cbeelcil Handling and Control laproveaeate 2$,000 100,400 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,010 10,000 S0,000 30,000 100,000
1. Central Laboratory DeVelopleat Program 125,000 55,000 25,000 25,000 5,000 11,000 $5,000
0. Water Cooservitioo Projects 1,220,000 70,000 100,041 100.000 101,004 100,000 470,000 750,000 I,220,000
1. later leolaeatlon lap and Spec Projects !00 000 100 000 t00 001 300 000 100 oil 101 000 101 000 100 Due !00 000
691-TO}AL - BPICIAL PIOJiC7D 1,265,000 l5 159 000 13/ 000 1 355 000 INS 000 1 115 000 910 000 !10 000 3 173 0A0 9 150 000 11 535 000
3. Igalpseot heat 32,550,000 J9 2!1 000 200 000 2 261 000 1 S00 000 1 300 000 1 S00 000 1 500 000 1 !f! 000 7 500 Off 15 TOT 000 L
707AL Join Voila CAPITAL 119VIIIHINTS A10 199 000 96E I/B BSS I01 )11 ASI 1011E2 000 II3 SOS 000 Ii/ 96S 000 9I 110 000 66 611 000 526 13! 000IRA 190 000 691 ITS 000t) 000
TOTAL VITA 18711) St ANNUAL III-LA CONS} COD}ADJU87KINT 1,230,371,209 104,341,451 103,422,000 1%610,763 111,662,601 111,471,055 80,992,111 517,221,237 121,607,511 126,129,iS1 299,111,600
1 Colu..Ls 1 1 1 1 t 4 1 t 1 1 1 C 1 1 1 1 1
I I I 1 I I
COUNTY 6.1 en OX 0 o aX a couNit ea 1WY E
x i CORE iOVI PXBNi aVOm}eX 7/1/90
I B9o-BI
nuCle s mxn IYcxma xN ..T etnn Orr ma
VEHICLES ..If. a0 iQ a TOOIA wm maxr aQ.tmaNT • 3u1nL W nx a xB m0es TmLL
xo. of ee BTM axr sssu-n-00 55sex-.-00 555e3-x-00 llBea-N-Oa. lsse•-n-Oa R527-x-00 55560-x-oo lss a-x-00 ; NOERE
3tl. X.n.e•.Ont omc• I
•.•ewwt auvw rt t..mU I so,Joo
I....nn.l I..oOo B,e}s x2s00 s3,eo0 I 102.175
3310 olr.=t.r of nn.n=e Is,00a 1 ,fi6B
2220 1==ountlni is.Bm I is,BZO
3310 eurcNelnery.waouelnB 2.300 1•,S10 I 17,000
3380 Infa,utlen 9y etwe 25,000 ]Is.150 8.500 ISx.JJs I aOB,ses
]]IO ....r.l auw rin 4ndmt 24,000 1a.000 to.... 25,200 12.300
mo P1.m wmt...n•. 30,000 3e,000 :B,esa 17.200 t,aeo us.na
I
3aso cm 1.=tmc n=uu1.. zaa,BBo s,3so .,oao a.vea I z}a,tso
]]50 Hoc Han lctl Meln[e n.n ce 81,100 Ie,3Bs t.e00 tOS,BBa
]J60 ilectrlcel Xa ntanenca 11.500 4.500 1i.53s Lfi35 IB.130 t.EBO I s1,ss0
]]10 Inetr u en t. Xetnten•nce 23.fi00 1.133 B,B SO l..JIO I 81.135
3380 n..t...t eLOt QUIT. D,000 a,000 tz,uo u,,0O 24so0 I (It,tsO
3510 0cectur If T.=Mlul Err. S,,UO 15,700 16,200
ssxQ m.vu.I=• Je,xao xv.uo o,axQ
]vo rocs... i.m. • p.u.. B.uS I !.u!
)S BO YEo w tory xm,s0o 3.350 210,010
3580 9awc• [on4o1 21.000 a,1S0 35.800 LfiOo 50.100 I laa.mo
3710 Olremor or ins ln••r me I 0
n2o It...me end O•.lEn 38,000 157,600 I 113,600
3190 cunit T.=tmn ......wt u•,mo 13,500 43.e75 tanoo 3,10o e,aa0 I 24S.e15
____________ ____________ ____________ ____________ ------------ __________ __________ - ---------- _____________
TOTAL 10-9I REQUESTS 653,500 I58,900 59.320 326,e50 331.t10 44,140 EE..t20 0 ; 2,262,000
........... ........... ......A.... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
"CORN 11.RLS CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND
CLASSIFICATION OF BUDGETED PROJECTS BY RRVRNUE PROGRAM CATEGORIES SCHEDULE B-2
FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 Page 1
A B C D E F G
REQUIRED REPLACBNNT IMPROVED ADDITIONAL REPLACEMNT IMPROVED ADDITIONAL
BUDGET 6 TREATMENT CAPACITY a TREATMENT CAPACITY
1990.91 RECONSTR RECONSTR
1. New and Rebudgeted Major Projects
A. Reclamation Plant 1
1 Headaorks No.2 E Plant N0.1, PI-20/P1.31 500,000 40% 601 200,000 300,000
2 Wastehauler Disposal 6 Sample Stu P1-27.1/2/3 500,000 50% 50% 250,000 250,000
3 Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15, P1-33 17,000,000 100% 17,000,000
4 Gas Handling Facilities, PI-34-1 7,000,000 201 801 1,100,000 5,600,000
5 Sludge Handling Facilities, Pi-34-2 8,000,000 501 501 4,000,000 4,000,000
6 Digesters 11-16, PI.34-3 7,000,000 100% 7,000,000
7 Rehabilitation of Digesters 7 R 8, P1-35-1 50,000 100% 50,000
B Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 6 10, P1-35-2 100%
9 Secondary Truk Expansion to 80 NGD, P1-36 600,000 100% 600,000
10 Primary Treatment 72 NGD Expansion, P1-37 1,000,000 100% 1,000,000
11 Misc. Modification, P1-38 1,000,000 1001 1,000,000
12 Security 6 Landscaping, PI-18-1 500,000 1001 500,000
13 Earthquake Work, P1-38-2 400,000 100% 400,000
14 Seismic Upgrading 6 Structural Work, PI.38-3 700,000 1001 700,000
15 Fuel System Improvements, R-033.1 200,000 100% 200,000
15 40 NGD Oxygen Activated Sludge A DAF's 1001
17 Belt Presses (4 Units) 1001
LB Solids Storage 14 Bins) 1001
19 Digesters: 2 E 110, Diameter 1001
20 Standby Power Generation 100%
21 12kv Electrical Power Distribution 100%
22 Electrification Project 200,000 100% 200,000
23 Raw Sewage emergency Bypass 1001
24 Remove Trickling Filters 163 100%
25 Central Air Compressor Station SOS 501
25 Misc. Projects 1 000 000 fi0E 20% 20R 600,000 200 000 200 DOD
SUB-TOTAL - RECLAMATION PLANT 1 1 45,650,000 1 1 8,000,000 2,100,00D 35,550,000
CORP4 91.ILS CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND
CLASSIFICATION OF BUDGETED PROJECTS BY DIVISOR PROGRAM CATEGORIES SCHEDULE B-2
FISCAL YEAR 1990.91 Page 2
A B C 0 A P G
REQUIRED REPL11111T IMPROVED ADDITIONAL REPLACIMST IMPROVED ADDITIONAL
BUDGET fi TREATMENT CAPACITY k TREATMENT CAPACITY
1990.91 RACONSTR RECONSTR
B. Treatment Plant 2
1 Support Facilities and Site lmprovements
a. Operations Building, P2-23.5.1 100,000 100% 100,000
b. Warehouse Building, P2-35.2 250,000 100E 250,000
c. Malntenace Building , P2-35-3 250,000 100% 250,000
d. Construction Management Office, P2.35.4 toOE
e. Phase II Site and Security Improvements, P2.35.5 100,000 100E 100,000
2 Misc Modifus R Improvements to Facilities, P2.37 1,000,000 100E 1,000,000
3 Rehab Digesters I,J,E, P2.39.1 1,500,000 100E 1,500,D00
4 Rehab Digesters L,M, P2.39.2 100E
5 Rehab Digesters N,O, P2.39.3 100E
6 Process Control Improvements, PZ-10 250,000 50% 50% 125,000 125,000
7 Primary Treatment 24 RON Expansion, P2-41 100%
A Secondary Treatment Expansion, P2.42 2,000,000 75% 25% 1,500,000 500,000
9 Electrification Project 1,000,000 t00% 1,000,000
10 Misc. Modifications, P2.43 500,000 100% 500,000
11 Earthquake Nark, P2.43.1 500,000 100% 500,000
12 Seismic Upgrading 6 Structural Work, P2-43.2 705,000 100% 705,000
13 Monitoring/Control System 2,000,000 50% 50% 1,000,000 1,000,000
14 fuel System Improvements, R-033.2 150,000 100E 150,000
15 Standby Poorer Generation 100E
16 Solids Storage: 2 Bins 100%
17 Additional 105 foot Digester 100%
16 Potable Water Distribution System 100E
19 Plant Water Pump Station 100E
20 Misc. Projects 1,000,000 601 20% 201 fi00,D00 11.01100 200,000
SUB-TOTAL • TRIATNBNT PLANT 2 ll 305 000 S 475 000 1 2,905,000 Z,925,000
C0121 11.ILS CAPITAL OUTLAY IIVOLVIIG IUD
CLASSIPIGTION Of BUOGITID PIOJICTS By levels[ PIOGGI GTIGRIIS SCVIOULI B-2
115G1 YGI 1990-91 Pape 3
A 1 f 0 1 P G
1109111D 11PGf110T IIPOOVID ADDITIOOL IINCIIIR Itlt10YID 1001}101AL
away A TIGTl11T GMCI}I A MARIIT CAPACITY
1910-91 IICOlSTI IICOVSTI
C. fact ution plant Sites
1 Site A<guuiliol 5,000,000 50% $ot !,Soo,000 2,500,000
J leclaution Plant 1 Ion,000 501 50% 50,004 50,000
sul-TOTAL - )MISSION PLARS S.IAO 000 Z1550.000 1 550 000
D. laterploat aid Joist facilities
I laterplut facilites, Id
1. 12D. Iolerplaot list 4,000,000 10% 20% 1001000 3,600,000
b. Iaterpliat Utility Chase 1,605,000 20% lot 200,000 100,010
c. Iadutrlal Water Line 11000,000 501 50% 500,000 SOO,DOO
d. Oigsater Gal Lime 500,000 50% 50% 250,000 150,000
e. Coulllntical Cable 1161100 50% Set S0,600 50,040
2 Support facilities Ind Site loprasemeats
a. Adtln. Building [)pia. 6 Mon. 1-0-4, J-7.5 1,010,000 101 I% 10% 101,000 I60,600 100,000
A. lelablCoae. fart. Lob it Pit 1 to Office, J-11-1 100%
c. Central Laboratory, J-17 1,000,000 1001 4,000,100
d. Vrtehouleltlaiatesince aides. A oil loci, J-20 200,000 Sot Sol 100,000 100,000
e. operations Building, J-23-1 6 2 1,500,000 Sot sot 750,000 750,000
f. Persaaael Bulldiag at Pll 1, J-26 100,000 loot 100,000
9. Demolition of Support !sandbag at Plant 2, 347
3 central Geotrltiaa facility
a. Igulpseot !repurchase, J-19A 5,000,606 Sot SOt 2,500,004 2,500,000
A. Itlislom larchase, J-193
C. Pilot I facility, J-194 6,000,000 Set 501 3,000,000 3,000,000
d. ?list 2 facility, J-19-2 1,000,000 Sot Set 1'000,000 4,000,000
1 Vista Gas flires,J-21, J-21A 650,000 1001 650,000
S Outfall A Booster Pup Statiols
a. leplic men! of 71, 0at911 Sever, 3-22-1 (Land) 1,000,000 100% 11000,000
I. Replace Cattail go. 1 Lead Section, J-22-2 100%
c. Rem Surge Tow go. 1, J-22-3 loot
d. Tenp C12 Statioa for Oe[flll Do. 1 100%
A. Second Mcharle Header GOBS -C- 70% 30%
f. lnend 71' to Deep Peter With ISO. 0.11.11 100%
6 bflueot Noneter and tart PICility,J-24/211/219 500,000 1001 500,000
7 Preparatloa of Utility Atlas, J-25 500,000 1001 560,000
1 Telephone/feleietry/tlooitoriag upanaloa 500,000 50% Sol 250,000 250,000
9 tlalateauce Mager Calputer System 500,000 loot 100,000
11 Buahard Ieterphat Troop Replacement 10% 20%
11 lltetrlul Polar Systems lebabilitatioB Studies 300,000 100% 300,000
12 Sludge Disposal
a. Compost Oenoaitratioa Plant Sol SOB
A. Lead Agu/litioa Sot Sol
c. Ludfill Oneloplest Pill, l Sot sit
d. Compost facility sot Sol
13 list Prolecti 1.000 000 601 20% lot 600,000 200,000 200,000
SOB-TOTAL - IMPLAli A JOIN} 77.150 000 IS,100 000 E 100,400 20,550,ado
SUB-}DIAL - nice PIOJICTp 91.d05 000 ll fiS 000 9 6ff.000 6I 515 000
COR14 91.ILS
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND
CLASSIFICATION Of BUDGETED PROJECTS BY REVENUE PROGRAM CATEGORIES SCHEDULE B-2
YISCAL YEAR 199D-91 Page 4
A B C D A F G
REQUIRED RRPLACEXNT IMPROVED ADDITIONAL RIPLACENNT INPROVRD REQUIRED
BUDGET fi TREATMINT CAPACITY 6 TREATMENT CAPACITY
1990.91 RICONS7R RECONSTR
2. Special Projects, Studies fi Research
A. Action Plan - NPDIS Permit Application 75,000 1001 75,000
B. Solids Treatment and Disposal Projects
l Sludge Disposal Projects 25,0o0 loot 25,000
2 Sludge Reuse Projects 25,000 1001 25,000
C. Deep Ocean Disposal Evaluation 5o,00D 100% 50,000
D. Air Quality Control Program
1 Air Tonics Inventory (AB258B) 1,000,000 1001 1,000,000
2 VOC/ROG FACT Demonstration Program 50,000 1001 50,000
3 Future Projects 100%
E. Chemical Handling and Control Improvements 10,000 1001 10,000
H. Central Laboratory Development Program 25,000 1001 25,000
1. Hater Conservation Projects 70,000 loci 70,000
J. Water Reclaaation RAD and Spec Projects ]Oo 0" 1001 100 OOo
SUB-TOTAL - SPECIAL PROJECTS 1 1S5 000 ]1.355,000
3. Equipment Items 2,t62,o0D lot 601 301 226,000 ,157,000 679,000
TOTAL JOINT WORKS CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS 103,422,000 2E B01000 167 000 62 254,000
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 t 1 1
RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 13, 1990 - 7:30 P.M.
I
4
F UPIU NO 91"^ - JT GIST 44M1x1M.G I:eS 1IAL PROCESSING URIC 5/12/9" i4LE ) t
AFPOYI NVMYEP R9S
]? COUNTY SANITATION III5I9IC iS Of OMANGE COUNTY 8.,.
�. CLAIMS 1'AID T5/F7/^3 POSTINF DATE 05/09/90
WARRANT H0. Vf NOUP AMOUNT DESCPIPIION
1C66PP AGKS COMPANY/IMAGER COPP. 4212.19 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
loA"3 AT 6 T $420.43 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICE
1 C6624 SCHILTNNECHT MESSIECHNIK AG IS39.UO METER REPAIR
106625 LINCOLN CAPFE IS A INTERIORS $311.41 CARPET REPAIR
106626 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS. INC. $579.997.00, CONSTRUCTION PI-34-2
106627 AIR PRODUCTS 0 CHCHICAL INC. $15.296.90 O&M AGREEMENT - OXYGEN GEN SYSTEM M.0.8-9-89
TRAITS ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT $29.00 ASPHALT
IU66P4 ALLWATER SERVICES $2.430.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICE
106630 ALTA SALES. INC.. 9595.07 INSTRUMENT PANT
D 106631 ROPCO INC. R/OR AMERICAN SEALS 57.004.6P. GASKETS 6 SEALS
IF4612 AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY 1365.P2 CAMERA
m I06633 A-PLUS SYSTEMS 115.193.43 NOTICES 6 ADS
m IRA634 APPLE ONE 14,122.70 TEMPORARY SERVICES
n 136635 ARI20NA INSTPUNE.NTS COPP. $421.50 INSTRUMENT PARTS
106636 AUTO SHOP EOUI-MENT CO. $1,564.11 TRUCK PARTS
196637 THE AVEBURY GROUP 12.529.9P MECHANICAL PARTS
10663A RC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY. INC. $661.50 CABLE
m 10f639 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $114,055.91 GRIT REMOVAL M.O.)-13-88
106640 BANANA BLUE. iRINT 51.593.19 PRINTING
106641 P.W. BABBITT AND ASSOC. $5.437.50 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PI-34-162,P2-37
W IV6642 PAXTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $1,597.35 LAB SUPPLIES
I CE643 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $754.95 INSTRUMENT
IP6644 DAMES SEN71E $413.48 MEETING EXPENSE
D 106645 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS $206.68 OFFICE SUPPLIES
1- 106646 BPAGG CRANE L PIGGING CO. $1.562.09 CRANE RENTAL
r 106647 PRINDEPSON CORP. $1,071.352.80 CONSTRUCTION 1-19-2
p 106648 BROWN 6 CALDWELL CONSULTING 5226.261.78 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19
3066.49 KATPINA BROWN 6 RUSSELL BROWN $975.00 LIABILITY GUINN
I0A650 SIEVE DUBALO CONSTRUCTION CO. 5596.715.41 CONSTRUCTION 16-1-1B
11,6651 BURKE ENGINECRING CO. $569.69 ELECTRIC SUPPLIER
IC6652 BUSH AN0 ASSOCIATES, INC. 314.5114.OG ENGINEERING SERVICES - SURVEYING
IP6f53 GAMY G. STALED 51.320.44 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
I9A664 CAL-CHEM SALES 1149.35 RUBBER PRODUCTS
106655 CAL SOU7M ENUIPMENT CO. 5495.00 ENUIPMENT RENTAL
196656 CAL STPTE SEAL COMPANY 597.30 PUMP PARTS
106657 CALTROL . INC. 112.9P REGULATOR PARTS
IL'f.65R CAL TYPE OFFICE MACHINLS4 INC. 149.94 TYPEWRITTER MAINTENANCE
IOF659 CALIFORNIA FILTRATION $243.09 FILTER
116660 JOHN CAROLLO ENG. 410.545.1E ENGINEERING SERVICES - STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
1966..61 JOHN CAROLLO CNGTNEERS 1221.914.4" ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-36.1`2-42,PI-20.1-9
IMFF62 CASTLE CONT6OLS. INC. $564.6P VALVE
t 106663 CENTURY 3AFLTY INST. 1 SUPF. 12340P SAFETY SUPPLIES
166664 CHALLENGE. frt',APING L IND. SPIT $711.23 HARDWARE
I06669 KELLY CHPISTENSEN $413.75 MEETING EXPENSE
106f66 CHROMALOY SALES FI.R29.11 ELECTRIC PART
IC6667 CHROME CRAMKSMAFI. INC. S480.40 MECHANICAL PARTS
n
� w
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING. CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/U2/9P CAGE 2
n REPORT NUMBER 4145
1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
N CLAIMS .PAID 115/J9/90 POSTING DATE -15/09/99
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
146668 CHURP GROUP OF INS.. AS $6,148.64 LIABILITY CLAIN -
19f669 CORINNE CLCSSOU 5223.75 MEETING EXPENSE
196670 COAST AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION $399.74 TRUCK PARTS
106671 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT 181.50 FIRE EQUIPMENT
I06672 COLICH AND SONS S347.395.50 CONSTRUCTION 7-11-I63
106673 C.I.E.S. . CO. . INC. 1660.L'0 PUMP PARTS
10F674 CONNELL G.M. PARTS / DIV• $259.99 TRUCK PARTS
106675 CON-VAT WESTERN EMPRESS 157.37 FREIGHT
106676 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. $4,822.31 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
n IC6677 CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS CO. $071.91 SAMPLE PARTS
1P667R CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPHICS 196.43 BLUEPRINTING
m 106679 CONTAINERIZED CHEMICAL DISF'OSA $1.399.00 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL
Z 1066PO CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS S1.801.95 BLUEPRINTING M.O.]-12-89
106681 CONTROL CABLES. INC. S34.76 TRUCK PARTS
D 106682 COOPER INDUSTRIES. INC. $1,020,145.68 ENGINES M.O. 5-13-87,6-8-88 J-19A
106683 COORDINATED EQUIP. CO.. INC. 1500.0n TRUCK PARTS
m 106684 R. E. COULTER CRANE RENTAL $1.186.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
fYl 106695 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC S1.774.94 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
3 lOF6P6 CRYSTAL CLEAR WINDOW RAINY. $535.25 WINDOW CLEANING
3t 136687 DANIEL$ TIRE SERVICE S487.86 TIRES
W IP6668 TOM DAWES S355.93 MEETING EXPENSE
1 196689 DE ANZA COPPORATION S920.00 STORAGE FEES
IC6690 MICHAEL R. DERLIEUK $19.129.33 DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF
IPA691 DESKTOP GRAPHICS 8 DESIGN $24.00 PRINTING
f— 106692 DEIURIK AND/OR CS CO. $3,732.38 VALVE PARTS
106693 OICMSONS $036.74 ELECTRIC PARTS
O ID6694 DIFILIFPO ASSOCIATES $494.06 PRINTING
106695 DISCO PRINT COMPANY 14.561.67 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
106696 DORADO ENTERPRISES. INC. $7.216.87 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS
A 166697 SUNNI EDWARDS CORF. 51.121.05 PAINT SUPPLIES
106698 EASTMAN. INC. 12.29R.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES
(7 IOC699 W. H. EBERT CORP. $526,759.50 CONSTRUCTION 2-26-2.2-27
~ 106700 EFFECTIVE VISUAL IMAGERY S476.53 PRESENTATION AIDS
1116701 ELECIRO NUMERICS INC. $2,497.72 INSTRUMENT PARTS
IA67C2 EDWARD L. ELLIOT, JR. 12.7R2.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-33
106IP3 ENCHANTER. INC. 411.61.1n.00 OSCAR MONITORING M.0.3-/4-90
1P6704 FACILITIES SUPPORT CO. 1235.49 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
IPf7U5 JOHN S. FALKENSTEIN F.F. 14.425.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-40-20
1367C6 FARR SALES A SLRVICE 124T.Pfi FILTER
IP67P7 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $169.25 AIR FREIGHT
10670A FERRELLGAS $22.95 PROPANE
IVf709 FISCHER B FORTER CO. 1122,966.74 CHLORINATION PARTS /INSTRUMENT M.0.12-14-88
156710 FISHER SCIEN71FIC CO. $335.75 LAB SUPPLIES
106711 FLAT B VERTICAL CONCRETE 1197.SP CONCRETE CUTTING
IT6712 FLEKIRLE SYSTEMS S33R.92 STRAINER
106713 FLUID HANDLING SYSTEMS S1.455.45 PUMP
VI
C
FUND No 91^9 - JT blSi YO CKIb4 CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/F2/90 RAG[ 3 y..
REPORT NUMBER AC43
nj COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OR/NEC C0@1 T9
W CLAIMS PAID 95/09/90 POSTING DATE E05/09/90
WARRANT 00. VENDOR AMOUNT OESCII-TION
106714 FOXP ORO CO. / HAG SYSTEMS 12095.45 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
106719 GANAHL LUMBER CO. 5978.04 BUILDING MATERIALS
I0E7I6 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. S1.8U0.54 TELEPHONE SERVICES
IU6717 GEORGE LEECH 6 ASSOCIATES $541.25 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
106710 GIERLICH-MITCHELL• INC. $3.760.88 MECHANICAL PARTS
116729 GOLDEN COAST SAWDUST PR00. $3.925.00 SAWDUST
106720 GOOD HEART WILCOX CO. $25.29 PUBLICATION
106723 GRAPHIC CONTROLS $141.87 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
196722 GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION $420.36 STREET SWEEPING
n 106723 DON GREEK A ASSOCIATES $1.111.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES - SURVEYING
G"1 106724 GCORGE T. HALL CO. f2.485.1P SCRUBBER PARTS
ITT 196725 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $312.93 GAUGE
Z 106726 MARRIS DATA CONN.. INC. $299.63 COMPUTER REPAIRS
O 106727 JAMES R. HARRIS $137.91 MEETING EXPENSE
n 10672F HATCH A MIRK• INC. 32.925.91 MECHANCIAL PARTS
106729 HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW S55.00 PUBLICATION
fTl 106730 WILLIAM D. HAUSER $426.0.1 MEETING MUSE
3 106731 S. A. HEALY CO. SIU2.603.59 CONSTRU Get ON PI-05-I
106732 HIL71• INC. $25.66 WASHER
106733 HOERBIGER C.Y.S. CALIF. • INC. $110.13 MECHANICAL PARTS
106734 HOUSE OF BATTERIES 596.65 BATTERIES
I 106735 R.S. MUGHES CO.. INC. $3.469.91 PAINT SUPPLIES
n 106736 HUN71NGTON BEACH BURDEN STAMP $410.44 RUBBER STAMPS
r 106737 IND INDUSTRIES 51.529.22 ELECTRIC PARTS
F- 10673A ISC,O. INC. $14•025.00 ENGINE PARTS
IP6739 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL f102.747.37, FERRIC CHLORIDE H.O.11-08-89
G I06740 INDUSTRIAL METAL SUPPLY CO. $1,168.28 BASIN RAILS
106741 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1,246.39 CONNECTORS
ti 106742 INFILCO DEGREMONT• INC. $9,198.06 MECHANICAL PARTS
.� 106743 INGRAM PAPER $1.383.30 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
f") 1^6744 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. 51.925.31 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
ti 106745 J L W SCIENTIFIC 51.530.72 LAB SUPPLIES
(A I06746 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $897.64 INSTRUMENT PARTS
106747 JENSEN TOOLS A ALLOYS $154.53 TOOLS
306748 JOYCE OFFICE PRODUCTS $60.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES
106T99 NAILECN-S COMPUTER SUPPLIES f1.5B9.33 OFFICE SUPPLIES
1P6750 HAMAN PEARINGS B SUPPLY 567.64 FITTINGS
IC6751 KANER COMPANY 510AB.49 HARDWARE
106752 THE KEITH COMPANIES 5416.75 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-3565-36
116753 BENNO. INC. $780,115.70 CONSTRUCTION 5-34-2
106754 MIFWIT PACIFIC CO. 1368.257.60- CONSTRUCTION PI-20
116755 RING NEAPIIIG. INC. $1.828.53 MECHANICAL PARTS
1P6756 KNOB INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIFS 5197.66 TOOLS
1067.17 MARTIN KORDICM. SP $2.550.0P. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 1-14-IB
10675E L P C TIME SENVICF $95.IIO TRUCK PARTS
106759 L.e. LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS 5295.PR PUMP PARTS
L .
ri
� J
FUND 110 9194 - JT UIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING D47C 5/ni/9b PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
D COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
r
CLAIMS PAID 0511,9/9G POSTING DATE G5/09190
WARRANT NO. VENOOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
106760 L16PERT ASSOCIATES OF $179.82 ELECTRIC PARTS
106761 JOUN LISEF PUMPS. INC. $36.13 FREIGHT
106762 LORAIN PRODUCTS $1.194.65 SERVICE AGREEMENT - RELIANCE TONER
I"FPS MRS 9293.31 PNOTOORAPHIC SERVICES
106764 RACOMCD SIR7.20 SERVICE AGREEMENT
106765 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS. INC. 62.574.51, MECHANICAL PARTS
106766 M C M ASSOCIATION 61.358.93 MEMBERSHIP
116767 NARVAC ELECTRONICS 6144.26 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
6 106769 MATT - CMLOR. INC. $2.172.92 MECHANICAL PARTS
n 306769 RETENA $58.85 INSTRUMENT
m 106770 MCKENNA ENGR. A EQUIP. $5.121.41 PUMP PARTS
m IV6771 MCRASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. SI.053.02 PUMP PARTS
OIOCT72 MICROAGC COMPUTER f12.U84.09 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
n IVA773 MICROAGE COMPUTER STORES $4,059.81 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
106774 MICROSOFT QUICK BASIC 4.5 $320.94 COMPUTER SOFTWARE UPGRADE
106775 HILTON ROY COMPANY $294.33 PUMP PARTS
m 106776 MONTGOMERY LARAPATORIES $1,600.75 LAB SERVICES
3 106777 ADORE PRODUCTS CO. $1.512.55 TRANSDUCER
106778 NOTION INDUSTRICS. INC. 6816.94 MECHANICAL PARTS
3! 106779 NAT. COUNCIL FOR ED. ON INFO. $225.40 REGISTRATION
00 106780 NATIONAL FIRE'PROTECTION ASSN $33.50 PUBLICATIONS
1 106701 NATTONAL PLANT SERVICES. INC. 697.499.2t CONSTRUCTION 5-27
1067P2 MEAL SUPPLY COA f450.66 COMPUTER PART
1 r 306,783 GUST K. NEWPERG CONST. CO. $2.985.437.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-33
r IBATb4 NEWARK ELECTRONICS 554.35 COMPUTER PARTS
106785 CITY )F NEWPORT PEACH $4.O9 WATER USF.ACE
07 106786 NORTH SUPPLY $58.36 T06LS
— 116787 OFFICE PAVILION/INTERIOP RES. $43.694•75 OFFICE FURNITURE J-7-4
y 1067MF OR SYSTEMS CO. 628.541.36 CHLORINE M.0.2-I4-90
S I06799 OLYMPIC CHEMICAL COMPANY f2.9A7.24 CHLORINE M.0.2-14-90
TC6790 ORANGE BEARING. INC. $182.51 MECHANICAL PARTS
106791 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. 9190.19 TRUCK PARTS
N 106792 OPANGE COUNTY CPEMICAL CO. A1.685.4P HYDROCHLORIC ACID
106793 ORANGE SPORTING GOODS 3191.24 LINE MARKER
IC6794 ORANGE VALVE 6 FITTING CO. $1.364.84 FITTINGS
196795 OSCAR-S LOCK L SAFE f111.56 LOCKS
106796 OXYGEN SERVICE 5755.96 SPECIALTY CASES
166197 COUNTY OF ORANGE $296.06 MAPPING
11679R COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 14.926.67 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
I06799 COU47Y SANITATION DISTRICT $4,420.47 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE
1FCROD PACIFIC PARIS $5.454.54 INSTRUMENT PARTS
IIARCI PACIFIC PROCESS CQUIFNENT.IOC. 61.174.5V MECHANCIAL PARTS
I1.69P2 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. 61.0H7.09 SAFETY SUPPLIES
1P6RR3 PACIFIC BELL 6706.54 TELEPHONE SERVICES
If6RP4 PACIFL CELLULAR 4153.57 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES
1P6P95 PAK WEST $333.20 JAME TORIAL SUPPLIES
t ,
� i
FUND NO 9I99 - JT LIST W06NING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/62/90 PAGE 5 •�
REPORT NUMBER AP43
3? COUNTY SANITATION 0I57RICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY i
lJl CLAIMS PAID 05/99/93 POSTING DATE 05/09/90
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIITION
I?6An6 PEERLESS WIPING NAR RIALS CO. $165.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
166k97 PERFORMANCC SEMINAR OUP f165.00 REGISTRATION
T 106809 POLSTENTIVFERP MEASUREMENTSIS . IN . itl r256.81 SAFETY
106R09 DOLT ENTERPRISES. INC. f990.25 SAFHTY SUPPLIES
136AII POWER
INC. T2tl$191.89 POLYMERS M.0.1-10-90.8-9-89
/ 106012 HAROL SYSTEMS 3191.89 ENGINE PARTS
106A18 NARBLD PROJECTS
SE ICE f36.00 ICE
I06Pl3 THE POREILLE SOLUTION CO. $9$140.70 PUBLICATIONS
INSPECTION M.0.8-10-08
IC6R15 ' FEND OR ELECT PUP LOCATIONS s190.1U PUBLICATIONS
➢ 206816 P.T.M. ELECTRIC MOTORS fI3602.39 MEETING[ MOTOR R¢PAIR
L1 106816 RAPID RAT 3$82.51 SAFETY
EXPENSE
Z 106818 RED WING SHOES 000.00 POSTAGE
SHOES
[7 106518 REMOTE METER PESCTTI NG SYSTEM f3 r560.00 ELECTRIC
➢ 106P.19 THE REPUBLIC WER SUPPLY CO. $307.95 ELECTRIC LSUPPLIES
ARTS
In SE2O REPOLI) POWER TRANSMISSION GRSHO E101.95 MECHANICAL PARTS
106821 MILTON S. WATSON 8 GERSHON f69.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.6-I1-86
3 106923 MIL TON ROBERTS
i513.22 CONSTRUCTION
TIONUPENSE
19FP23 J. R. RUCKING CORP. 3966.$35.03 FREIGHT
J-17
101825 ROOT TRUCKING f35.01 FREIGHT
106826 ROSSAO RIFE INC.NILBE f2.69R.06 BATTERIES PARTS
306826 SAP WIFE I f1$265.60 BATTERIES
1 106M2T SAFETY-NEE EN CORP. E265.60 PARTS CLEANER
106029 SANTA AEA AG CO. MOTORS $395.6P ELECTRIC MOTOR
106029 SANT4 RE LER CO. .200.09 BAGS
r 106831 THE SCR OENGI CO. 35.813.76 ENGINCONSTRUCTION
SERVICES
IOG031 SCHULERCOA T DESIGNING CORP. E2$3.932.62 CONSTRUCTION P1-27-112
CJ I06P32 SEA COAST DESIGNS f3.932.62 TOOLS
HORIPM¢NT
' 1O6P33 SEARS. ROEBUCK R CO. f95.60 TOOLS
IPFP39 S.F. $EQUIP.I NO f539.10 TOOLS
EXPENSE
19F835 SEWER EQUIP.SCO.ECURITY
OF AMEPICA 32.695.00 TOOLS
("l 1968J6 SHAMROCK SECURITY f911.0P TOOLSSECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS
y 196R3T SHAMROCK SUPPLY E859.50 SOIL
IC683A SMITH-EMERY CO. E5 r910.06 SOIL TESTING N.0.6-19-89
I/6P39 SOFT WAREHOUSE 312B.R0 COMPUTER PARTS
106P91' $0. COAST 4C0 STALI TT i1.350.10 APPLICATION NCES
106891 SO. CALIF. COASTAL SONWATERCO. l2S4.090.00 POWER
ADVANCE
106092 SOUTHERN CALIF. FOISOM C f9.191.93 DIESEL
196P93 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $2,161.25 OFFICE EUEL
1n6P99 SPACCSAVER DSYSTEMS,RINKING INC. s2r161.P5 OFFICE G WIPMENT
I06P95 STAMEN[TTS DRINKING WATER flr688.57 ENGINEER WATER
It-ID6N96 STAMEN 2. $PASSOLY P.E. i5$636.93 TOOLS
38RYIC85 J-19-2,P1-33,Pt-37
11684R STAR
UMM TOOL 6 SUPPLY CO. f6T6.93 TOOLS
106849 SUMMIT POWER
f1.232.50 JANITORIAL
10F953 SUPER
ONTI ENTAL AIR UCTSTOOL $858.93 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
106851 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL, INC. E851.23 TOOLS
IO6A51 T 8 C INDUSTRIAL CONTkOL$• INC flr291.23 ELECTRIC PARTS
1.
j -
FUND NO . 9199 - JT DIST WOP01N6 CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/12/9F PAGE 6
REPORT NUNPEP 4F83
n COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
Cn [le1HS PAID OS/Ir9/98 POSTING DATE 05/09/90
WARRANT 40. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
10-852 TALIN TIRE, INC. $2.263.34 TIRES
IL6653 THE TEFNIPI COMPANY S124.19 OFFICE SUPPLIES
IS6054 THEO-TELLO-NUSCH. INC. $751.DU CHLORINE STEM REPAIRS
IVSP55 THERMO ANALYTICAL. INC./MORPAL ITS.-0 LAB SERVICES
3061,56 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE, INC. S16.940.44 TRAFFIC COPTROI. DIST 3
IP6857 TRAVEL TRAVEL $4.432.00 TRAVEL SERVICES M.0.6-14-87
]O6P58 TRUCK B AUTO SUPPLY. INC. S878.81 TRUCK PARTS
19AP59 J.G. TUCKER A SON. IF'C. $575.31 INSTRUMENT PARTS
10696P TWINING LABORATORIES OF _ $8,242.75 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-L4-89
3. 106F61 UNOCAL $241.R5 UNLEADED GASOLINE
m 10686E UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $70.99 PARCEL SERVICES
IT 106P63 VWR SCIENTIFIC $1.396.50 LAB SUPPLIES
2 106864 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $5,780.28 FITTINGS
p 106865 VALLEY DETROIT DIESEL S837.50 ENGINE REPAIRS
n 346666 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $486.41 SAFETY SUPPLIES _
r 1^6P67 RICHARD W. VON LANGEN S349.16 MEETING EXPENSE
m 106860 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $710.75 REPAIR MANUAL
3 106P69 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 31.352.57 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
T^.6P70 JOHN R. W4PLES 3533.39 DOOR CONTROL CONSULTANT
3t 106871 WARPINGTON $115.00 INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION
00 106PT? WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY $14,642.94 CAUSTIC SODA H.0.8-9-89
146P73 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. S325.16 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
IB6A 74 WILSUR-ELLIS COMPANY $4.942.63 INSECTICIDE
196875 JAMES A JUDITH WILSON $365.74 LIABILITY CLAIM
r. 106PT6 WOROPERFECT COPP. $1,845.93 COMPUTER SOMARE
106877 XEROX CORP. S5.045.28 COPIER LEASES
r p 109818 MORRIS PING SRII.23 MEETING EXPENSE
106879 ZIEBAPIH AND ALPER $7211834.10 CONSTRUCTION PI-34-1
(n -----------------
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 05I09/9p 312.758.570.01
'-I
om
r N
r
f
r
` � 6
J
NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/02/90 PACE 7 '
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
i CLAIMS PAID 05/09/90 POSTING DATE 05/09/90
V
SUMMARY AMOUNT
/2 OPEN RAND f 663.83
/2 CAP PAC FUND 627.797.43
83 OPEN FUND 16.975.22
/5 DPW FUND 1,446.71
85 CAP PAC FUND 822,360.63
86 CAP FAC FUND 1,175.25
17 OPER FUND 3,878.28
07 CAP FAC FUND 394,805.48
y 811 OPEN FUND 51.26
L1 III CAP FAC FUND 318.01
Z 814 CAP PAC FUND 451,350.10
1566 CAP FAC FUND 66,689.26
y 0667 DPER FUND 2.045.60
f7614 DPER FUND 9.14
JT DPER FUND 399,974.42
f71 COST 9,572,462.48
3 SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FUND 12,4L7.85
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND 384.149.04
CO f 12,758,570.01
n
r
r
0
z
N
I
J W�
FUPD UO ^1'+` UT ••IST 'WURPII:G CIIIVI. IPOCESSINP U(IL 9/17/4+ fArr I
RI PORT NUP.OEI Al 15
CO CPUNIY SAN17AIIAN DISINICIS Of OPANTL COUNTY
CLAIR$ 141D +'6/P3/11 POSTING DATE e5/23/91
B-•
�VAAPINT 110. VLN4OR AMOUNT •JE.^•CRIpTIRN
I0A028 A-1 rprPESS DELIVFRY SFRVICI 321.31 FREIGHT
1/f929 AUII Am. INC. 399.20 INSTRUMENT PART
1 T4010 AT S T tiTT.i3 TANG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
106931 ACADEMY OF DEFTMSIVF DRIVING 3670.JC DRIVER TRAINING
19032 ACCUAABS RESEARCH♦ INC. stab..), LAB SERVICES _.
I ,P 033 JAC AOVA6CF- 606UO i66.26 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
n
101934 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. S?53.566.3P CONSTRUCTION PI-34-2
Y' IC693} __ AERO TECH SUPYr YS. INC. 3IT466.25 - AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
I ; 10693E AIRCRAFT NCATIOG R ELECTR ICAL i49.SI REFRIGERANT PARS
IJ69
3T AIR COLD SUPPLY INC. 352F.4R DANAGREEME
I,n 306938 TIN PRODUCTS i u.v4UL INC. L15.295.3U AUTO AGREEMENT - OXYGEN CEN SYSTEM M.0.8-9-89
1x6939 LCA"sl NG AS$OC IAIF S/PLI STA if"-- Yl 29l.72 AUTOMOBILE LEADERS
I, I0L941D SAFETY SUPPLY AMERICA $12.64 SAFETY SUPPLIES
pp 106941 ALFH16A2 SLS58.10 PROPANE
�a 1A6442 _PLLYASTf SENVICF -- - -� - -f F.fi 34.91i - - -- VACUUM TRUCK SERVICE - - --
L.1 1.694S AMERICAN DISTRICT TCLE6RAPH $553.16 SERVICE AGREEMENT
; 106944 ROOCO INC. 3/04 AMERICAN SEALS 34.566.9E CASKETS 6 SEALS
I9A945 __ ARFR IE6I(-iIDNNiC3�"iDEvtr"-- ' - -- AR4.65 CAMERA
P' 106946 AMERICAN VULRAN CORP. $9.E22.77 MECHANICAL PARTS
'+• If.6947 AMF.AITECH 397.75 COPIER LEASE
p� 1�1694R - - - CI TV DF-R11AHUR - -- -- -- - - ------ - $1.235,401.44 - -� SUER REHABILITATION M.0.12-10-86
196949 APPLE ONE S1.119.20 TEMPORARY SERVICES
^i1 196059 ARATU SERVICES. INC. $7.671.59 UNIFORM RENTALS
-' 1Vf951 _ . . ... .. N1C1i0L15 Ap HDNTES. S74I.91 _. _. _...__ .. MEETING EXPENSE
:-� 11F952 AR120NA INSTRUMFNTS CORP. 3127.50 INSTRUMENT PARTS
106953 _ ARROW TRUCK BODIES R EQUIPMENT _ $2.196.75_ TOOL BOX
1 � 194954 - - A3SOtlitED SOIL,-6N6INEENIN6 -- - T19.516.09 _ BOIL TESTING 11.0.6-14-19
106955 ANSI $710.00 REGISTRATION
' (p IlA95A FALCO4 DISPOSAL SERVICE $167.592.90 GRIT REMOVAL X.O.7-11-BB
04967 P.Y. RAR617I ANU ABU. - - i5.59n.66 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PI-14,P1-74-2,02-37
IO69SH R. BATEMAN S9PS.Oi DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
1V6959 PAATfP SCIr11TIf IC Pp000CT5 32.59H.Rr. LAB SUPPLIER
1i14960 NOHr.RT DCEN.NTLLfLAN FROST C {R i57.378.66 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-34.5-H3
�N 1069A1 PTOCYCLE 349.P5 PUBLICATION
y 1060.62 HOWARD BLCVINS t29'6(1 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
1Ef963 HOW CASCADC OFFICE F06DUCTS $164.05 OFFICE SUPPLIES
.� 10/Pf4 POLSA RADIATOP. SERVICE 14.337.S2 RADIATOR REPAIRS
1 106965 PO"•A-RUES 3263.44 TRUCK PARTS
1CF966 DOYLE ENGINtr A1NK CORP A1.311.0i ENGINEERING SERVICES
1^6967 BROWN i CALDWELL i2.559.15 LAB SERVICES
13L96P BROWN L CALLWELL CONSULTING 8138.736.IR ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19
16f9L9 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. 1194.6% ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
ICA91l RUSH AND ASSOCIATES. INC. 3fi.552.CR SURVEYING SERVICES RES 88-71
1-16971 _ GARY 6. $TRIED t257.47 PEITY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
1Of517 Br-DRnDUt TF MA•:AGIKLNF, INF. 3P.540.91 FERROUS CHLORIDE H.0.4-12-89
1A(973 CPI COMP. / SUPHIT SOLU710115 32.245.PJ MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
to e
� w
■!/
FUND Nb 91>9 - JT UI ST MWxINn CAPITAL
" PROCES S N RtC 9/1T/9? GRGF 2
P &UNER AP93
COUNTY SA417AIION DISTRICTS OF IRA COUNTY
C61N3 PAID 05/2314d POSTING OAIC
^
II5/23/93 ---"-
IN
1i -WARRANT NO. VENVOR AMOUNT OESC7IIT1ON
136-74 CS COMPANY f3a61.07 VALVE PARTS
106975 CAL-GLASS FOR PISEAPCH9 INC. f2.0O3.17 LAB SUPPLIES
I AL976 . '.. . ..CA LTR OL'__ INC: ._-.."-.. _. .. .. . . . &3741S;7 J' _ ... - __. . REGULATOR PARTS. .. ... _ "_..—
L! 10l977 CALIF. RUSIUESS LAW INS71TUIL S695.0P REGISTRATION
..� 1IF978 CALIFORNIA FILTRATION S1.162.93 ENGINE PARTS
196979 "- 'C4ROLLO=ODYLE FNOINFFP3-- "-'-" SIOi115.11 ENGINEERING SENV1@E8'RES 89-122
106900 LCAMDPE P. CATACUTAN S344.60 MEETING EXPENSE
106981 CHALLENGE ULARING 4 IND. STEP 5766.94 MECHANICAL PARTS
. ...... .IOf98P ' _... -----__GTOPGE"ATTNARFTTE--_____.__ ._.. —...-356EG44 MEETINGEIRRN88 ' -___..
6 D Inf903 CHEW SERVICE $55.52 LAB SUPPLIES
„� 1A69R4 CHEVPON U.S.A.♦ INC. $14,290.06 UNLEADED GASOLINE
m 106905 _. "CRROME'CRANR5114fTi INC7--___ -_... _...1870:6D_. -_ ... MECHANICAL PARTS -... .. _.. .. _. _. _.-. .
v Z 196986 COLICM AND SONS f363.647.73 CONSTRUCTION 7-IL-11
o n I06967 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF $3.265.13 FITTINGS
I36900 ._. __ _._CONNELL-G-.R: 'PART97 Ui T.___....__...___.._..._._.__199:16 _____.___—____.TOUCH PARTS
IOf9P9 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. 16,125.65 ELECTRICAL PARTS
.-1 10f990 CONSOLIDATED FAEIGHTMAYS $301.54 FREIGHT
3
9G 991_..._. . _._.. - . {2. .5 .._._..__._.__.__. CHLORINE N.ua6-1149 .- . .
10I.992 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS f1.034.15 INSTRUMENT
M 0.7-12-89
,•30 1U6993 CONTROL DATA CORP. ,349.99 INSTRUMENT PART
1 D6994 . ... . _.-.-➢DNTpOLCD.___ ._. ___._.__.______ ___.___. _._._--3S4G:J6.._.__.____.._..._ MECHANICAL-PART&
.. I 1P6999 COOPER INDUSTRIES. INC. $1,425,092.60 ENGINES H.0.5-13-67.6-8-88. J-19A
1 P6996 COORDINATED EQUIP. CO.. INC. $250.00 TRUCK PARTS
. ; f00997 ""Cost A'-MESA-TUT O'SUPFL4___�.__. ___..__.__ - ;Ii700:7d . _.....-_ _._-__..TRUCK PARTS ...". _ _._ .. . ....._..
10699E COUNTY.WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $652.86 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
106999 CRANETEN S366.30 TRUCK PARTS
107600 . .... - ..CRAVEW; BARGE& 6"CbAPARY___.__.__.___..__ .._....17i590:00 -._ "—.._LIABILITY CLAIM
10701'1 CAL WATER 5287.44 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
I67PO2 LARRY CURTI TRUCK S EQUIFMEN7 S23.940.00 SINCE REMOVAL H.0.4-13-88
101003 . .. ONE. INC. -_.. ._____.... .. _ . . . 9914.15. ...___._ . . . - VALVE PARTS
107004 DE AN2A CORPORATION $150.05 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
�.� 137205 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES SI.S07.6S PRINTING
217,106 DISCO PRINT tONWAWY-"-" ' "-- ' 11410.36 - -" -"' - OFFICE EQUIPMENT - -
!• 147W47 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. S735.79 PAINT SUPPLIES
I' 1071.06 D-VALS SALES f542.55 FITTINGS
if r5u9 F.I.L. INSTRUMENTS. INC. 1446.41 INSTRUMENT
I11 IPTLIS E•ISECO-CPL 52.350.+0 OCEAN SAMPLING
1 107011 LASIPAN. INC. 151A.56 OFFICE SUPPLIES
j.i 107612 ECUSV$TF.MS LNG1Urr AING E ANALV f4.51O.J0 6GEAK RESEARCH
l 107i13 FFFLCIIVF VISUAL IMAGERY $22.04 SLIDES
117414 ILICI AIR $466.18 MECHANICAL PARTS
19Y 15 ELECfPUN1C PALINCIMP CO. 1390.•1e IRA"
4.j 107116 RP.' SCRVICY COMPANY $123.76 VALVE PARTS
107E 11 FACILITIES SUCPOP1 P0. 13).-If SMALL HARDWARE
107 1P Ma09DALL FA IARES 1354.:f DEFERRED COMP DISTRISUftDW
I.�I IPIPI9 JOIN 6. FALKENSTEIN P.E. 13.75d.09 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-4, J-20
W
.FUND NO 9111 Jl OICT HONKING CAPITAL FPOCESSINT• DATE 5/mg, TAOI 3
W REPORT NUMBER AFAT
I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANCC COUNTY
t ILO 11 - CLAIMS LAID 99/P3/97 POSTING OAIE PS121/46
:•� WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DCSCRIPTIUN
• 107924 FARR SALCS A SERYICF fB.580.0; FILTERS
U• TC21 FEDFR AL CMPNCSR CORP. 1112.50 AIR FREIGHT
1.) .. lO1t;52i....._ ..F13t11ER i' FD4ICe-00._ _._._.. _ ... _ ..__.. .. _. . .. 0PS.0t _ _.. - ._. . - INSTRUMENT PARTS
r� 147323 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. 11455 1e LAB SUPPLIES .
117024 FLAT A VERTICAL CONCRETE 6856 50 CONCRETE CUTTING
ti;l 2E- - -" --- SCRUBBER PART
n 167026 FORD AEROSPACE A COHM CORP. $19.941 5A REFUND USER ME OVERPAYMENT 1
• IU702T FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA
�• $30T29 PHOTO SUPPLIES
1d2R _ ' -_-FD) N;ERFpIEfS _ SAFETY
COHSGLTINC --
197229 FOXBORO-CO. / NAG SYSTEMS $1,324.64 FITTINGS
107036
A.F.A FREY 3105..00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
I6;hJl VALVES i
•+ 107932 CITY OF FULLERTON f3q.91 WATER USEAGE
107033 GTE EDUCATION SERVICES. INC. S48.61 AMSA BULLETIN BOARD a
' 151634 GAIIANi ENNRE'R t6:---_ _ ._-- .. fill:$I _.__--_ mimo R _
-�' 1D7035 GARDNER LITHOGRAPH $189.50 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT .i
107036 GENERAL CHEMICAL 67.R68.06 CHEMICALS _. ..-.___._-_
ld -DENTRAC'IEEFPRDNE"CS:' .---......i�.S$I.AT--_—_.--..TELEPHONE SEiV[CES .
347038 FL04ENCE L. GEPDFS $471.20 MEETING EXPENSE
197039 _ _ __ GIFRLICN-MIICMELL♦ INC. _111,342.04 _MECHANICAL PARTS
jh;6 OLD MWE ST N LAMAT; -316R.bj- REFUND USER PEE SERVICE12Nf' i
�. 1 107N1 SO Al WESTERN ASSOCIATES
OM 61.890.00 STREET SWEEPING SERVICES u
• 107DAi OON GREET t ASSOCIATES fEA.318.00 SURVEYING SERVICES RER 88-)? .,
I37crl_ . . .. ---dEARiu i�dREEdTd.: INC-. ...— iG6T2b.S7. ._ .___—.rRuGR eAArS . .._ _ ._._
107019 OANSON-LORAN CNf RICAL CO. $1.210.55 REFUND USER TEE OVERPAYMENT
107C45 FRED A. HARPER 61.995.00 DEFERRED COMP R[STRUUTION u
11-1646 NEAR INd;DN 1N60191W-RCiS;TEf...._..___.._—_.._.....__;f6S:2$ Y;LLVL PARTS__.. __._... . ._._..__.___.___...._..—. ..
I. 107347 HATCH L KIRK. INC. lb.310.15 ENGINE PARTS
I 10709q NOCRNIGER C.V.S. CALIF. . INC. 6415.04 _ COMPRESSOR PARTS
DEFERRED COMP DIS'IRItIRI011
107E2• HOUSE OF BATTERIES 61.138.99 BATTERIES i
1 1 "51 STEVEN J HOVEY f7E.95 MEETINC EXPENSE
31) 52 _ R:S.-HU6RES Me INt.-------_. 62:b26.9d__.. _ .. __.__..... ..Unre SUPPLIES _.__..... .. __. .. ..__ ._
107FS3 CITY OF PONTINCT04 ROACH 115.910.50 WATER USGGE
.A 147454 HUNTINGTON SUPPLY _ $114.9.9 HARDWARE _I0TJ5B ]CC INSTNIHU N1 - - - - Li.IS METER REPAIRS
107P56 TVA INSINCERE f7.115.30 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-I)-I
IA7•157 IMIL014L WEST CHEMICAL 119.361.51 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-08-89
13705E INCON SI tfMS. INC. - IR56.19 - ENGINE PARTS
107059 IMINUSTRIAL 3TSIEMS. INC. 670.30 ELECTRIC PARTS
IL796O INVUSTPIAL IMRLADCO PRODUCTS 3LG53.79 CONNECTORS
�.� 1e1961 Iw,OAN PATIO 62,129.35 PAPER
Q.A. 1O736T INSIEr P:STE C/O CAP. PFFOPTS f259.00 SUBSCRIPTION
L; 197:E3 INfEPNATIONAL SENSOR TE[M. $4.957.55 INSTRUMENT PARTS
1CV64 TRVINE RANCH WATEP DISTRICT $1A.94 WATER USEAGE
107965 ;kFAT WESTERN SANITARY SOFT'• $1,516.60 JANITORIAL SERVICES
!•1 R
FUND 4141 Jr UI41 WOPKINP CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE illr/97 PAGE 4
C REPORT NUMUER A143 ^
C DUNIY SANIIAI ION UIS7RICTS OF ORANGE COOK TY
o?.. . . _. . .. _ .. . ....... ...._..l LAtns AAIU 55)2S)N•� PD6t tNC DATE ii5lz8lg6..... ....._ . _. ...... .... ........—a
WARRANT NO. VENDOP AMDUNT OFSCRIPTION
107066 A.F. JOHNSON COMPANY $97.26 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
107u67 GCRALO JONES $841.25 MEETING EXPENSE
1 ' lu1AbR. ...._' . JOYCE OTFIEt FROOUCI3 .. .. ..._._ ._._ .._ . ... ._., 8451:75 . . ...__._.__.oPPite sUPPLA9 .. -. . ._... _._ ...__ :
107P69 KALLELN•S CDKPUTCP SUPPLIER i410.91 COMPUTER PARTS
107.171 KAMAN BEARINGS A SUPPLY $41.29 FITTINGS
._._ 1isl'M . . KANEh'tbilPANY ._ _...... 1 ... .. . . .. 5999:41 . ... .__ . . 3YioLs - .... ..__ �
167072 XEEN-NUT AHPASIVE CO. $499.38 TOOLS
n 1r7g73 KIND OFARING. INC. 5702.U2 MMKICAL PARTS
IP7014...._—......'..RNUI-INDUSTRI'AL '3UP'PLIC3__..__-_.. _. ... _iYi:d'1 _... "Us .. . - _....
107U75 MARTIN ROAMER, SP $2,475.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 1-14-1
107U76 H.V. LAWMASTER A CO., INC. 17.234.50 SOIL TESTING
..137iM ......._.,....LE.Eo3'TMORTNRtiP-.. . .__.__._.....__.... ._.....__.._.__._ _. -'311}75i .. .. _......- PNinumEff suPPLi@s .".. . . . .._"..
147970 LIEHEPT ASSOCIATES OF 5674.44 ELECTRIC PARTS
107179 WILLIAM J. LLOYD $89.25 MEETING EXPENSE
Ip7YOC.-._...___.LOCXL`IFGERC7_..... 56:dii LAPCo PE@ . .. ... ......_.
107J81 LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION $140.629.37 POOLED EMISSIONS ESTIMATING PROGRAM N.O. 12-13-89
107082 A.J. LYNCH CO. $1,276.02 JANTTORIAL SUPPLIES
. WIFS._. .......____. -RoUr AA'iNl.-....__.. .._...._.. ._...s}:IiS:ad- ....._'.-- -----3eaviGE AGREEMENT........ ..__ . ....... ......_.. i
I07L84 MPS SBO.54 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
197385 MALCOLM PIRNIE , INC. S2,735.97 ENGINEERING SERVICES
FAA'QAC- lnAORIC3___._._. .____.__......._._3St..@5.....___-._.___..__.. INSTRUMENT suePLles. . . . .. ..._ .. - _..__.
1071p81 KETCMA 111,038.39 INSTRUMENT REPAIR
a.1 10708P MCMASTFR-CARP SUPPLY CO. $752.71 BUILDING MATERIALS
.... 1D7TN4 .. . "" 'MEA3URL NERT'tb1iTR GC-3i3:lAi:..__.__.._.___._..._..... . .41:I}4:}'F..... .�..._ _.._....._ INSTRUNENr PA@Y3 . .. . . . ..
10799g THUMPS R. KELTON 1187.74 MILEAGE EXPENSE
107091 KICROAGE COMPUTER $5,213.69 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
.. 10642 11IGRDAGC LaNPU1FR 'S'TONET—__.... _...__._.—_. .ORRICE RQDIPHRNT'._. ..... .. . . . ....__..!
107093 PILLIPORE AND/OP WATERS $1.228.44 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
167194 011CHELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. 5102.0U PUBLICATION
107II 95 .. . .. Rltflin D.-Nbb9E' ._. ._._.......__._.... ......_._.. .. .. 1431:05 _ .. ._ ._.. . ... MEETING RXFRNIE- . .. . .,
117096 MORGAN CRANE CO.. INC. $4,411.02 TRUCK PALATE
117,97 MOTION INDUSTRIES, INC. $433.17 MOTORS
.. 1blallo - - MOYDIIUL'A) Illt:""- '.......__.._........ ........ ... . U66.N3 - .. .... ___.. ... .. RADIOS .
�Q/1 I0699 MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICES 188.3R INSTRUMENT REPAIR
IU7100 HULICK, INC. $954.93 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
�••� 1n 7 is-I w iluRAL'PLANt st RVltEsi IBC. 16.644.Sli VAccuN TRUCK SERVICE
P� ID 7112 NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPLY ♦196.711 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
p 207103 HATIOYAL Tr CHNICAL INFORMATION 1509.00 DEPOSIT
• IJ,I I i7104 City of NENIORT REACH' "" 15.44 WATER "
1 1071115 CITY OF NEVI'OPT PEACH 576.1.4 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
1•. 107111E CHARLES NICHOLS S29.54 MEETING EXPENSE
L� Ir 7167 NO2ceL raxt6oLs. list
AL MECHANICAL FARTS
107100 UNITED NOTTINGHAM S51.eP FREIGHT
IE7109 O.-.S./SOLAG 01PIOSAL CO SBS.r10 TURN REMOVAL
�•'� 1A711b OCCUPATIONAL VI 3ERVICt.t ;591.7T SAFETY CLASSES -
i 107111 ON-LINE ELFCTPDNICS 1112.10 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
j W
FU6U NN al"P - JI 1:1'1 60MMINR Cc1ITAL YPOCESSINE, DATE 5/li/a•. IAC.f 5
REPORT HUMUER Alt!
b3 COUNTY SAI'ITFTION GISTRICTS OF ORANFI COUNTY
Ul CIAINS PAID O6/2.3/1! POSTING DATE 05/23/9/
I - WARRANT NO. VENOOP AMOUNT PESCRIPTION
rl 117112 PO!9'MT J. 007EN $262.2V MEETING EXPENSE
I I, 197113 ORAYCE HEARING. RIC. 1399.7E _ _ MECHANICAL PARTS _
!+I IO111t ORANGE COISI CL[CTR 1C SUYPLT _ f395.55 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
167115 DRA NGE COUNTV FAR" RIIPPLT CO. S337.P5 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
II t116 ORANGE VALVE 1 FITTING CO. f2.9R2.17 PITTINGS
I 1,17117 OSCAP FS LOCK L S1rC -- - - 314 !O KEYS '
I 107119 OXYRIN SERVICE 12.298.78 SPECIALTY CASES ,
117119 ., ._ _.COUNTY Of ORANGE_ _ _ f3.JJ5.00 _ DATA PROCESSING SERVICES
01 SP7120 CSOOC SELF-FUNDED MEDICAL INS' t1V0.103.00 PREMIUM ADVANCE
^1 107121 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 16,166.14 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE
'�• IOl1E2___ __ ROPE.PT L. CITRON _ $75.00__. „DEFERRED COMP- PICKLES .. i
__�__
I'+ I071P3 - PACIFIC SEMEN MAINTENANCE
CO. f5.269 36 SAFETY SUPPLIES
107121 FACIr IC SEMEN RAINIE NANCE CORD SB.861 l6 SEWER PIPES '>
I _ 107125 FAR_UCST _ _ _ . i1329911 _.__ JANITORIALSUPPLIES .. _ ....
1! 1O71Y6 EECYC PLLL 7I ER �— $317 07 MEETING EXPENSE
IC 7327 ROT PENDERSROFT $445.00 DEFERRED CORE DISTRIBUTION
V'j-.1 1071'2R _ PHOTO 6 SOUND CO. _., _ .. f13161.10__ ____,___ OFFICE EQUI PMLNT
.,II/3T
•+ 101129 PIMA SR PIERCE fl63.00 SLUDGE EXPENSE
117131 PIMA SRO SVSiFN$. INC. $44.245.47 SLUDGE REMOVAL M 0.3-11MEN ;
17i131 _ _ _FISH YUH f197.17 REFUND USER PLL OVERPAYMENT
P ADO 1071 PLAINS TR UUE PAR Yi .293.88 POLYMERS
HARDWARE
• 107133 FOLYFURE. INC.EN f30.203.R6 POLYMeRB M.O.1-10-90,0-9-89 .
167134 .... .. POWCP ELECTRO SUPPLY CQy^ ^� _ _._ $130.31 ELECTRIC,SUPPLIES,
r107135 HAROLDTPRIMR P00IICEI$ 1799.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES
IC7136 HOOFED PRIMROSE ICE f1N.30 ICE
P^:r 107136 _. , . IROFCSSIONAL TREE ASSOCIATES $39.]R .TREE REMOVAL
1071]N •40i E5510 NAL TREE CARE f2.003.10 -- _ _�-- -- tIl¢8 REMOVAL
�•:.-i 1-7139 THE PROJECTS SOLUTION CO. $4.399.30 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION H.0.8-10-88
In 107116 PAOCLIFFE CONSULTING GRP 1293.00 PUMP PARTS
ja I07N1 R61MR6Y RI$IR3AL EO. - -- fl.dii.13 TRASH REMOVAL
ti
107142 RCCYC. INC. 139.900.110 SLUDGE REMOVAL H.0.5-11-80
:•'C1 107113 M.A. REED ELECTRIC 1105.I5 ELECTRIC MOTOR �
I� 107111 - if,if Pff-7. BECO - �- � - - - - - 1115.:IO - MEETING EXPENSE _
147145 THE REGISTER f13R.55 NOTICES 6 ADS
•? 1.7146 REMEDY TrpP _ f1.339.59 _ TEMPORARY SERVICES
j 10714t 111E RE4URLIC SUPPLY CO. 16U2.71 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
p� 1.17148 RENES rNGINLLRIMG CO. f1.652.I9 MANHOLE COVERS
J� 1CT119 NICHAPDS. WATSON A GERSHO_N 17.192.23 _ _ LEGAL SERVICES M.0.6-11-86
107150 LAURENCE R066 3325.51 MEETING EXPENSE
IRTISI ROYCE IHSTRUIIr NT $1,131.23 INSTRUMENT PARTS
167152 PUTAN 0 TUCKER S29.336.29 LEGAL SERVICES - BEATRICE/HUNT 6 UNIVERSAL CIRCUITS r((
�{ IO7153 NYAN-NERCO 61R.196.13 CRATING
p,l 137154 JOSCFII I. RYERSON R SON, INC. 14.17.11 PUMP PART
..I IMS5 S1tETT-FLEfN COMP. S132.R0 PARTS CLEANER
'• 10115E SANIA ANA ELECTRIC MOIONS L416.91 ELECTRIC MOTOR
.I 107157 SANTA Fr GAS co. 635.d1 FREIGHT
L
]n
FUND If ni jQ - JT nl$l WORKING CLI-I III FROCiSSING DATE S/11/9" FAGF 6
REPORT DUNHER AT4l
CW COIIl11Y San,IT AI[on DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY '
•' 1 CLAIMS PAID 3S/23/9) POSTING DATE D5/23/40
! CF1
I -WARRANT ND. VENDOR AMOUNT PESC41^TION
Irl
p.l,. I07I SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT•L 212.455.52 OF MONITORING N.0.6-14-89
IP71" $I A. COSST DESIGNS f2.296.72 OFFICE
FURNITURE
10716F• bEWEP'F.aUTP: CO. OF ARI'N I[d - "' "' t1.187.99 - -- -- - TOOLS - -':
I. 107i61 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $616.81 SAFETY SUPPLIES
IV7162 SHARED LOGIC* INC. $225 00 REGISTRATION
107165 - - - SHELL OIL to. - _ - _ - - - 145.0 - REFUND USSR PEE ow"AYMENT 13
u 107164 CONSTANTINE SIAC[LLO 115.391 '•0 DEFERRED COMP PAY-OFF e.
107165 SMITH-EMERY CO. 1/9690 0U SOIL TESTING M 0.6-Id-B9 ,-
-'-""I07186 "'_ SOFT" VAREMDUSC " - "_-'-_- - - -- - - -378.34 "'-'_"" _ .-._-_ RUMPUTER SOFTWARE - - �
1A7167 SOIL AND TESTING ENGINEERS f246.B9 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-09
n :I- 19716R SOLAR TURUINES E7) INC. i9R.7B FREIGHT
._ 1C7169 -,SO. AIR GUM TV ` - - 13;066.55 APPLICATION PEPS
fYl 147170 SOUTH COAST DODGE S127.CP TRUCK PARTS
Z
r•p Ir17172 SOU1 CALIF. EDI SON CO. 4289.4TB.41 POWER
r;D' IdT 172' ... --" '-"SO: CALICACIi.'"E OISON' [D:' _.__..___ .. ._ _-.-..._. ..;Bs749.b1....--.-.__._."-._..-P6iGR FOLR RRLDCATIOE PI-J3
�..y 147173 SO. CAL. GAS CO. $6.192.05 NATURAL GAS
1117174 SO. CALIF. WATER CO. $90.63 WATER USEAGE
3 197375 _ _-- SoU1HCRN_COUNIICS_OWED. 17r365.24.__.__.... --_....OIRSEL FUEL. _ .. . . . .. -_.. �•
107176 SPARKLFTTS ORINMING WATER $1,546.67 DRINKING WATER
:•4_ 107177 WESTALLOY INC. 42.2R5.1T WELDING SUPPLIES
.-.W 101i 78 ._. . .._. _SPIRAL BINDING"CD:"-IND: _____ _.._-.i573:2�.----_.--OPPICE SUPPLIER.._
107179 STAR TOOL S SUPPLY CO. f566.18 TOOLS
107280 STCNLIAG ART f41.59 - GRAPHIC SUPPLIES
.-r147161 NIRC -STURT _--- - -- -"'""-""#354.iR '_'_'----- _"---MEETING EXPENSE --
107182 SUMMIT STEEL $29134.93 STEEL
•.r 101183 SUN-PELT LANDSCAPE S RAINY. 139847.00 CONTRACT CROUNDSKEEPING M.0.8-9-89
... - 107194' - SUN tEECIRt[-tBRP_. . ..._..-.._..-...._- .__._. -" 239"P0 TRUCK PARTS
ti
1071P5 SUNSET FORD f21 58 TRUCK PARTS
<CO 1:7186 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL. INC. S8,271.66 TOOLS ;j
pry 1371FT SURVEYORS-SERVICE CO: -_-_" 13;914.b7 "- RAPETT SUPPLIES
I9TIR. TAYLON-JUNN SIR6.25 TRUCK PARTS
G-1 14
TIH9 TF.P9AR COMPANY t1.S76.25 LAB SUPPLIES ,.
N. _ 1.1719G TONNE AOVERIISFMS - -_-_- _ S9:573.13 "- -- - ASSESMENT USER FEE MAIL DOT FIST 2 -
1G7191 TRAVEL TRAVEL 12.274.30 TRAVEL SERVICES M.0.6-14-87
161152 TRUCK A AUTO SUPPLY. INC. _ 1543.65 TRUCK PARTS
n
IC7193 J.G. TUCRER S EON, IkC. 1538.35 BATTERIES -
1 I 307194 TWINING LADFIRATORIES OF $79133.25 SOIL TESTING M.O.6-14-89
11.7195 THE UNISOURCE CORP. fR.R99.56 _ PAPER '
19719A UNTIED PARCEL SCRVICE '365.29 PARCEL SERVICES- - - -"
197197 NILLAP ELEVATOR COMPANY $326.15 SERVICE AGREEMENT _
I. I0119P YUP SCI ENIIFiC f29089.17 LAB SUPPLIES
IP71P9 VALIN CORPORATION $553.97 REGULATOR PART
1072)0 VALLEY CITIES SUFFLY CO. 14.341.19 FITTINGS
' I17201 VARIAN INSTRUMFNI GFDUP 1693.25 LAB EQUIPMENT -
�- 1P7202 VTKING INDUPTRIAL 3UPFLY 3730.56 SAFETY SUPPLIES - - - "
L. I 72 C3 LARRV UAL KEN A59O CIATES. INC. 46.921.1. CONSULTING SERVICES - CLEAN WATER GRANTS
1
rsl
'UND NO ^1'^ JT UIST VONVINE CAI IT7L IIRCCLSSI14G n.IE 5117/^ IAGF 7
REPORT NUNRLP AF41
Ep C'WNTY SAIIITITION UISIRICIS OF ORANLE COUNTY
I LLSINR W D +R/.^5/n4 POSIIUG DATE 15/2S/'l1
V
�NANRANT NN. VC111.ON 14OUN1 DESCRIPTION
1077C. MARK U. NALILN fl^2.Of• MEETING EXPENSE
19721!5 _ NALTFRS NNOLFSALF ELECTRIC 5239.cf LLELTREC SUPPLIES
107266 _ CAPE UARRBJ' t CO, - fP.592.39 - INSURANCE CUING ADMINISTRATOR
117267 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL $56.75 PUBLICATION
IP7238 GARY YFLLN4N 1342.P6 MEETING EXPENSE
167209 - 4NIAUOU CoRl'. REFUND USE
PLL OVERPAYMENT
I,�I IF721G NILLOAN ASSPCIATLS $391.61 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-29
197211 ROUPxE A 6DOD0
UFC 446.296.19 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.6-4-89
kEROk-COAFL - _. . _......_.._ .... _. _ _ - _ - '11/0.96 _ COPIER LEASES. .. . . .. ._ ...
107213 YELLOW SPRINGS INSTRUMENT CO. $134.43 LAB REPAIRS
;3. 147214 VICTOR ZORITNSx1 1600.27 MEETING EXPENSE
m ha215 -RRifARGK LULLF. ____.__ _. _. _ -3236.FP _. ....- _ _. DEFRRaRD COMP HSTIB17IION _.
-----------------
� y
P5123794
t !URINARY ANDUNT
' ...01 OPER FUND .. ._._—__.... ___._ _ _..-_.___. . _ - 343.00'
A 12 OPER FUND 13,993.15
{1 12 CAP FAC FUND 1.253 107 43
i-- 03 OPER FUND .. ._..___._ .__. ... .. _.__ . ._ .. -- 7571010._
05 OPER FUND 5.058.09
05 OAP PAC FUND 55.338.6657
fi OPER FUND .... __ - - - ... __ —_.- .....- . . - RS].2 21L___._._
07 DOES FUND 13.883.96
07 CAP PAC FUND - 368.705.47
1 Oil OPER FINITE _ - . . _.. 8,443.67
Ill CAP PAC .76
00
y
014 OPER FUND
3816__ _ .
014 OEPR FUND - - - 1,99292.9494 -
.En 014 CAP PAC FUND 4.293.14
0566 OPER FUND .
4761 CAP RAC NDNO 1,174.50 69,4
07614 OVER FUND 210.78
JT OPER FUND I.014,210.78
, CORF - .. 2;496.520.54 _ ._.... _ _ _..._. .. ...
SELF FUNDED RUBBERS COMP INSURANCE FUND 119,862.03
JT NURSING CAPITAL FUND 179,126.23
5,614,844.53
I
June 1, 1990 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
MEMORANDUM of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
+ssaa ewe.WNUE
TO: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager ueaa.
xmmraw varMIMW
, sxne.e+n
n+a seas824on11
FM: Ted Hoffman, Purchasing Manager
RE: Purchase of One (1) Inductively Coupled Plasma Emission
Spectrometer, Specification No. E-190
Sealed bids were opened Tuesday, May 8, 1990 for the Purchase of One (1)
Inductively Coupled Plasma Emission Spectrometer.
Tabulation of bids is as follows:
VENDOR
BID ITEM LEEMAN LABS, INC. LECO CORP.
A. Inductively Coupled Plasma $136,675.00 $137, 000. 00
Emission Spectrometer with
an Ultrasonic Nebulizer.
B. Inductively Coupled Plasma 121,675.00 122, 000.00
Emission Spectrometer
without an Ultrasonic
Nebulizer.
An alternate bid was requested to exclude the Ultrasonic Nebulizer. Due to
the equipment budget dollar amount, and the fact this accessory item will not
be needed in the near future, the alternate bid is recommended for purchase.
Leeman Labs, Inc. , the apparent low bidder failed to meet the required
specifications on one item. Specifications required a solid-state radio
frequency generator. Their unit bid includes a power tube type.
It is recommended the bid and alternate bid from Leeman Labs, Inc. , be
rejected for not meeting specifications. It is further recommended that the
award be made to Leco Corporation, lowest bidder in compliance with all
specifications, for the proposed amount of $122,000.00 plus sales tax for bid
B. Sufficient funds are available from the capital equipment budget for this
purchase.
Ted Hoffman
Purchasing Man er
We hereby concur with the foregoing recommendation:
�..►� G y G. treed, Charles Jacks'
D recto of Finance Laboratory Manager
"C" AGENDA ITEM N9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS °C
,
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 FIT AVENUE
FOMMLIN VALLEY, CAL4'ORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Seventeen (171
CONTRACTOR. J. R. Roberts Cgrnnratian DATE June 13. 1990
JOB: Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (DedgsL) $ 21,626.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as oaq)ensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 - FIRE ALARM SYSTEM ADDITION
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install a new fire alarm system to
serve the Administration Building. The fire alarm system was required by the
City of Fountain Valley Fire Department and was not included in the contract.
The work consisted of installing a fire alarm control panel in the New South
Wing Utility Room No. 130 and a remote annunciator in the Plant 1 Control
Center, installing 3/4-inch conduit from the utility room to Telephone Room
No. 153 in the existing Administration Building, installing a 3/4-inch conduit
and wires from the fire alarm control panel to the fire sprinkler pipe flaw and
temper switches located at the southwest corner of the New South Wing,
furnishing and pulling a new No. 9 conductor cable from the utility room to the
Control Center and wiring the above equipment. This item of work was
accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of
the General Provisions. (Reference: PCR 44, 44A and 44B)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 10,841.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 - REHEAT COIL FOR CONFERENCE ROOM A
The Contractor was directed to add a reheat coil to the HVAC variable air
velocity unit serving Roam No. 110 (Conference Room A) in the New South Wing.
No provision was made in the contract drawings or specifications to provide heat
to this room, which always remained cold in winter. A hot water coil, three-way
valve and associated piping was added and connected to the existing hot water
system pining in the ceding of the New South Wing. This item of work was
accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B
General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 77)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,904.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"U-1" AGENDA ITEM #90) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELSSS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIT r MA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. Seventeen (17)
COTIPRACPDR: J. R. Roberts Corooiation DATE June 13, 1990
JOB:—Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4
Item 3 - ABATING AND VENTILATING COMPEWSOR R1=ATION
The Contractor was directed to relocate the heating and ventilating system air
compressor and air dryer out of the existing Administrat:Lo, Building Elevator
Fgai wmt Room No. 134 to the outer foyer. This item of work was required by
the State of California Division. of Industrial Safety Elevator Section. The
work consisted of ra,,7nug and rein-tarring the air compressor, air dryer,
electrical disconnect box and associated wiring. This item of work ors
acomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of
the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 40A) . _
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE CHEM ITEM: $ 3,439.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 4 - MISCELIANEOUS ELECTRICAL CHANGES - NEW SOUTH WING
The Contractor was directed to perform additional electrical changes in various
rooms of the Now South Wing and the Chiller Hui 1di The items are as follows:
provide power to an additional irrigation control unit on the east side of the
Chiller Building; wire power boasters for electric latches on Doors 20 and 25 in
the lobby of the New South Wing; add light fixtures in Room Nos. 116, 120 and
208. These items of cork were accarpli.shed by Contractor's force account
pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCC) 52)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORCER ITEM: $ 2,442.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ONW ITE24: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 21,626.00
TOM TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be perfonaed incidental
to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any
revisions to the Contract Time made by this and any previously issued Charge
`..� Orders. It is therefore uutnally agreed that no time is required for this
Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential coats or
expenses have been or will be incurred by the Contractor.
"D-2" AGENDA ITEM p9(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-2"
+ r
COUNTY SANIMTION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNMIR VALLEY, CUZEURSSA 92798
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. Seventeen (17)
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE June 13, 1990
JOB: ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION, JOB NO. J-7-4
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT Tim
Original. Contract Date July 11, 1988
Original Contract Time 602 Calendar Days
Original Caupletion Date March 4, 1990
Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Tice Extension 89 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 691 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date June 1, 1990
Time Subject to I gaidated Damages Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 3,549,000.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 462,578.00
This Change (Add) (Deduct.) $ 21,626.00
Amended Contract Price $ 4,033,204.00
Bawd Authorization Date: June 13, 1990
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDED BY:
)
Construction Manager Date
J. R. RCBERT5 CORPORATION
BY: BY
- r �., �%t/- 9, �J
Oontxactor Date Director of Engineering Date
"D-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-3"
COUNTY SAMATIM DISIRICIS OF CRANE CODNPY Page 1 of 4
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 E[T•TS AVENUE
FaNTAIN VALLEY, CAInTRUA 92708
CHAIXE ORDER
GRANT NO. N/A
C. O. NO. One (1)
CONPRAMM: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE June 13, 1990
JOB: CENnM IABORATORY. JOB NO. J-17
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (DaducL) $ 22,378.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 BOII,DING PAD FIIIPER FABRIC
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install filter fabric over the bottom
area of the structure foundation overexcavatian for stabilization of existing
soils. This was necessary in order to begin engineered backfill and auction
required by the contract specifications. Upon ccupletion of the required
overexcavaticn, the Districts' soils consultant farad the wasting soils to be
too unstable to obtain the required aopaction without some prior stabilization.
Installation of filter fabric was the method determined to be most economical.
Filter fabric was not shorn on the contract plans or included in the contract
specifications. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force
account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions.
(Reference: FCO $1)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER Tffid: $ 20,832.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 7 Calendar Days
Item 2 HARDWARE ADDITICNLS AND DE=CNS
The Contractor was directed to modify the hardware schedule shown in the
contract specifications. This resulted in an addition of hardware sets for
Doors 59, 63, 86 and 91 and a magnetic contact for Door 40. The above items
were riot included in the hardware schedule. Ttelve specified door drop latches
were found to be unnecessary and were deleted. This item of work was
accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of
the General Provisions. (Reference: RFI Nos. 3 and 4)
ADDED COST THIS CEA4M ORDER ITEM: $ 587.00
TIME EME NSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"E-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "E 1^
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF CHANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 4 _..
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 W-1 AVENUE
FOUR PAIN VALLEY, CALIECHNIA 92708 �✓
CHANGE ORDER
GRANT NO. N/A
C. O. NO. One (1)
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE June 13, 1990
JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17
Item 3 RESTAOOK PIPE nmmaaTAL CHANGE
The Contractor was directed to change the contract-specified extra heavy cast
iron pipe for the restroan drains and vents, to service weight cast iron. This
change was made due to the unavailability of extra heavy cast iron plumbing pipe
and fittings necessary to complete the project as shown on the contract
drawings. This item of work was accwnplished by Contractor's force account
pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions.
(Reference: FCO #2) .
DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (1,155.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 4 CHANGES TO ELEVATOR FINISH
The Contractor was directed to change the finishes on the elevator cab doors and
hoistway entrances fran baked enamel to brushed stainless steel. The project
architect requested the change as stainless steel is a :rare durable finish and
will age better over the life of the project. No finishes were specified for
the elevator in the contract specifications. This item of work was accarplished
by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General
Provisions. (Reference: HE No. 28)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,114.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 5 DELETION OF 120-DAY LIQUIDATED D MGES CLAUSE
The contract required the Contractor to cafplete installation of the roadwork
and underground utilities in a time period of 120 days from the date of issuance
of the Notice to Proceed. Southern California Edison's service rez++rements for
the facility have not been finalized which may affect installation of
underground utilities and site work as shown on the contract drawings. It was
detenn ned that it would be mtually advantageous to J.R. Roberts and the
Districts to delete this contract requirement. This item of work was negotiated
pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the G�meral Provisions. (Reference: OCSD
letter 3/14/90)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 0.00 �../
TINE EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER TM: 0 Calendar Days
"E 2 " AGENDA ITEM #9(C) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-2 "
COUNTY SANPl'AITCN DISTMI5 OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 108" WELTS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, allaFDRNIA 92708
CHANGEOR�R
GRANT NO. N/A
C. O. NO. One (1)
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation MSE June 13. 1990
JCB• CENIRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17
TOTAL ADIXD COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 22,378.00
TOTAL TINE EIM SION THIS CHANCE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
The additional work stained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prise work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Tine made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 7 days' extension
of time to perform the work is required for this Change Osier, but that no
direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or
damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted
and approved by this Change Order.
SO OPM OF CO1NTRACT TINE
Original Contract Date Nazch 1, 1990
Original Contract Tice 420 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date April 24, 1991
Time Extension this C.O. 7 Calendar Days
Total Time Extension 7 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 427 Calendar Days
Revises Final Completion Due Date May 1, 1990
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 7,090,000.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00
This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 22,378.00
Amended Contract Price $ 7,112,378.00
"E-3" AGENDA ITEM N9(C) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-3"
=MTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF CRAMS COMM Page 4 of 4
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 1311TC AVENGE
FOMMUN VALLEY, OUJF RUA 92708
CBANGE ORDER
GRANT NO. N/A
C. 0.. NO. One (11
CONIRACIOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE June 13, 1990
JOB:-CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17
Board Authorization Date: June 13, 1990
COMITY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
REC2092 ED BY:
natnwtion mma��o Data
J. R. ROBERTS CORPO2ATICH
ACCCEEPTEE�D.BY: / ,� VBY:
cmdmacter Data Di ra,-r..' of EngUmering Date
"E-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(c ) ALL DISTRICTS "E-4"
COUNTY SANP1'MON DISTRICTS OF CHANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 2
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 PfT.TC AVENUE
FT NBUN VALLEY, CALIFCMTIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. One (1)
CONTRACTOR: Cooper Industries DATE June 13. 1990
Energy Services GrOUD
JOB: Purchase of Spark-Ignited Engines for Use in Central Pmer veneration
Systems, Job No. J-19A
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Dech:ck) $ 10,000.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes 3n the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as coupensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 ADD PIITOR CCNIROL STATION
The supplier is directed to add a new control to the computer control system
furnished under the basic purchase contract agree ent for each of the eight
engines in accordance with the proposal dated April 11, 1990, increasing the total
authorized amount from $20,658,245.00 to $20,668,245.00. The increase was
negotiated with the supplier in accordance with Section 10-6(B) (2) (a) of the
General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE OREM ITEM: $ 10,000.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 CHANGES IN DF.r.I= SCHEDULES
The original supply agr t contains numerous delivery dates. This item
changes dates for selected equipment based on mutual need. The changes are as
follows:
Original Revised Delivery
Item Delivery Date Extension Date
Heat Recovery 6/30/90 63 Days 9/1/90*
Equipment and
Controls (2-4[1])
Spare Parts (2-4[L]) 6/3/90 58 Days 8/l/90
*Original coupletion date for receipt of heat recovery equipment (480 days) was
previously extended, based on date of Notice to Proceed.
"F-I" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "F 1"
Comm SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 2
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 RE-1 AVENDE
FODNTATN VALLEY, CALIECRNIA 92708
CBANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. One (1)
CONTRACTOR: Coffer Tndug;triw DATE June 33, 1990
Enemy Services Group
JOB: Purchase of Spark-Ignited Engines for use in Central Power Generation
Systems, Job No. J-19A
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mxtually agreed that no time is required
for this Change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential
costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor,
except as expressly gated and approved by this Change order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TINB
Original Contract Date February 9, 1989
original Contract Time 480 Calendar Days
Original Ccffpletim Date June 3, 1990
Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 89 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Tim_ No Change
Revised Final Completion Due Date September 1, 1990
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Tine Subject to I&pidated Damages Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 18,968,113.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 1,690,132.00
(Amendments 1, 2 and 3)
This Change (Add) (Dada=) $ 10,000.00
Amended Contract Prise $ 20,668,245.00
Board Authorization Date: June 13, 1990
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
REC=17mp BY:
Construction Manager Date
COOPER INDUSTRIES
ENERGY SERVICES GROUP
ACCEPTED BY: APPROVED BY:
Date Director of Engineering Date
"F-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-2"
COUNTY SANiTA'ITON DISTRICTS OF CHANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 4
`.►' P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 EISSS AVENUE
FaDWLIN VALLEY, CALITURNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. Five (5)
CONTRP.CIOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE June 13, 1990
JOB: WAREHOUSE AND MINTENANCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING
II4TOVEMENTS, JOB NO. J-20
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Doduct.) $ 16,526.34
In accordance with contract provi.ei.ons, the following changes do the Contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as caq nsaticn therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 - BUILDING INSULMON DWERIAL CHANGE _.
The Contractor was directed to change the type of building insulation to be
installed in the open ceiling area of Buildings 4, 5 and 6. The type of
insulation was changed f3= unfaced batts to foil-faced fire rated type.
Installation of open faced batts per the contract specifications would have
resulted in fiberglass dust constantly falling of Districts' personnel working
below the unfinished ceilings. The open faced insulation will also become a
nui.sance dust collector in the the future, creating an unhealthy working
envirconent. This item of work was acco(plshed by Contractor's force account
pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: POO 18)
ADDID COST THIS CHANGE ORDER T1'EM: $ 9,852.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 - FENCING AND GATES FOR BUILDING 8
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install new fencing and gates to
enclose the auto shop coupound. A new double 10-foot wide gate was installed on
the north side of the auto shop coupound at the request of Districts' maintenance
staff to provide service access to the area between the auto coupound chain-Link
fence and the existing brick wall co the south side of El J Avenue. A new
27-foot wide gate was fabricated and installed between Building 8 and the existing
Auto Shop to secure the southwest entrance to the auto shop coupound. These gates
were not shown on the contract drawings and were not included do the contract
specifications. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account
pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 19)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,459.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"G-1"" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "G 1"
CD[II7iY SADII=CN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 4
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE -
FOU nUN VALLEY, (71LU-CRUTA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. Five (5)
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE June 13. 1990
JOB: WAREHOUSE AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING
IMPROVEI,=, JOB NO. J-20
Item 3 - BUILDING 6 DISHWASHER ADDITION
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install a dishwasher in the new kitchen
in Building 6. The contract drawings and speafficatims dirt not include a
dishwasher for the kitchen. This item of cork was acccaplished by Contractor's
force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions.
(Reference: JRR quote 3/14/90)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,247.00
TINE EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER I+IEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 4 - EXISTING ELECTRIC PANEL BUS BAR ADDITION
The Contractor was directed to add a new bus bar to exazt g electrical panel "D"
inside the existing electrical/instrument shop "A." The bus bar was added in
order to provide space to connect new electrical power feeder cables serving
Buildings 5 and 6 as the existing bus bar was found to have inadequate space to
make the new connections. The new bus bar was not shown on the contract drawings
nor included in the contract specifications. This item of work was accomplished
by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General
Provisions. (Reference: RFI No. 65)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER TI M: $ 1,809.00
TIME EXTENSICN THIS CHANGE ORDER TIM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 5 - CONCRETE SEALER MATERIAL CHANGE
The Contractor was directed to change the contract-specified floor sealer to a
combination floor hardener penetrating sealer. The sealer spacified was an
acrylic surface sealer used for low traffic areas and was a non-penetrating type,
subject to peeling from sustained use. The penetrating type sealer will not be
subject to wear. This item of work was accarplished by Contractor's force account
pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: JRR quote
4/17/90)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,888.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER TI M: 0 Calendar Days
"G-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "G 2"
COUNTY SAnTrrnmrCN DZS1'RICTS CF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 4
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELT.TC AVENUE
FOUNIAAIN VALLEY, all EMUMA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. Five (5)
CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE June 13. 1990
JOB: WAREHOUSE AND M lbTM ANCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING
IMPROVEMENTS, JOB NO. J-20
Item 6 - ABADIDON[+ U OF 6-1NCB WATER LINE
The Contractor was directed to delete the abandonment of an existing 6-inch city
water line crossing the North Road in two locations south of the Administration
Building New South Wing as shown on Contract Drawing G8. The work was required by
the City of Fountain Valley but was performed by another contractor enployed by
the Districts. This item was aco mplished by Contractor's force account pursuant
to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions.
DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (2,726.66)
T114E EXTENSICN THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 16,528.34
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be perfoared
incidental to the prise work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and airy extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore nutually agreed that no time is required
for this Change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential
costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor,
except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date February 27, 1989
Original Contract Time 240 Calendar Days
Original Ccapletial Date October 25, 1989
Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 43 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 283 Calendar Days
Revised Final Coirpleti.on Due Date December 7, 1989
Actual Final CaVl.etion Date Not Applicable
`J Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
"G-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-3"
CC= SANr CN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COMM Page 4 of 4
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 EfT.TS AVENM
FO[IIdl' M VALLEY, CALIk1 OZM 92708
CHANCE ORDER
C. O. W. Five (51
CONIRACTOR: J.R. Roberts DATE June 13, 1990
JOB: WaMOTISE AND MAINIENANCE 13=11G AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING
IMPROVEMENTS, JOB NO. J-20
Original Contract Price $ 3,266,000.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 220 456.00
This Change (Add) (Dom ) $ 16,528.34
Mended Contract Price $ 3,502,984.34
Board Authorization Date: June 13, 1990
COONPY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORATXE COUNTY, CAi.IEORNIA
RECOfII✓MWED BY:
Construction ManagerDate
J. R. ROOMM COEMP. CK
Y: APFe= BY:
Coutractoa• Date Director of Engineering Date
"G-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-4"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNPY Page 1 0£ 7
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
EOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORIM 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Twenty-Nine (29)
CONPRP.CIC7R: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE June 13, 1990
JOB: HBAIIeAmRS NO. 2 AT PI,ANr NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-20: AND DEanr.rrrON OF DIGESTERS
NOS. 1, 2 AND 4: REPLACEMBNr OF BOIIER: PIPING CLEANOVPS: AND GRADING AND
PAVING AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-31
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 130,821.95
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorizer) and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Job No. P1-31
Item 1 - NEW BOII.ER MODIETCATIONS
The Contractor was directed to make modifications and additions to the hot water
circulation system at the new, boiler. Alan included in this item is the
relocation of a light pole for better distribution of light at the boiler control
panel at night. The significant parts of this item include furnishing and
installing of a hot water control valve and a pneumatic indicating valve. These
parts were not shown on the contract drawings and were necessary for proper
boiler operation. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to
Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCO Nos. 168 and 129
and PCB No. 86)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 9,138.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER TPEM: 0 Calendar Days
Job No. P1-20
Item 2 - INFI )ENT PUMP AND SCRDBHER CONTIM MODIFICATION
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install additional pressure switches
on the influent pump seal water system and to the scrubber recirculation pumps.
Also included in this item is a modification to the scrubber differential
pressure transm tters and the pressure-to-current transducers at each of the four
scrubbers. In regard to the added pressure switches, the seal water system on
the influent pumps required sensing elements to identify a seal water failure.
The scrubber recirculation pumps discharge piling required sensing elements to
verify flows within the scrubbers. These required pressure switches were not
shown on the contract drawings. The scrubber differential pressure transmitter
and pressure-to-current transducer were furnished and installed per the contract.
The original contract docmients did not include provisions to transmit a signal
from the transmitter or the transducer to any type of recording or indicating
device. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section
10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: ECO Nos. 172, 201 and 203,
PCH Nos. 104, 118 and 120)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 13,141.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"H-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-1"
CO[ M SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 7
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
EODNPAIN VALLEY, CHIN A 92708
CHANGE ORDEE
C. 0. NO. Twenty-Nine (29)
CONUMCTC7R: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE June 13, 1990
JOB: NH'^Adr-- NO. 2 AT PLANE NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-20: AND DEMOUTION OF DIGBSTEOS
IRIS. 1, 2 AND 4: REPIMTMENT OF BOILER: PIPING CLEAN)UTS: AND GOADING AMID
PAVING AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-31
Item 3 - IEM INDICATOR ADDITIONS
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install two digital electronic wet
well level indicators at the VFD roan in Power Building 3A. These additions were
requested by the Districts' Operations staff. In the event the automatic control
system for the influent pumps failed, the Districts' staff would have to operate
the pimps manually at the VFD's. The contract dial not include level indicators
in the VFD room. Without level indicators in the VFD room it would be difficult
adjusting punp speeds to match N+canNng flows. This item was negotiated with the
Contractor ro„e.a„t to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions.
(Reference: E00 No. 221, PCH No. 122)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 7,593.00
TDO EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 4 - MIAOT PUMP SYSTEM COA'ROI. I=C MODIFICATION
The Contractor was directed to modify the influent pump system control logic.
The nrdifications included two additional digital indicators on the Headworks
control panel, an additional two-position selector switch and control logic
program revisions. These modifications were requested by the Districts'
Operations staff to be able to monitor each of the levels in the two ptmp wet
wells and to eliminate a potential problem of locking out the lag influent pop
during a lead punp failure. This item was negotiated with the Contractor
pursuant to Section 10-6(h) (2)A of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER P..l'EMM: $ 6,251.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"H-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-2"
' COUNTY SANrBMCN DISIRICIS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 7
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENGE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. Twenty-Nine (291
CONPRPLTM: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE June 13, 1990
JOB: HFADKORXS NO. 2 AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-20; AND nFmrm.rrrON OF DIGESTERS
NOS. 1, 2 AND 4; RagACEMENT OF BOII,ER: PIPING CLEANOUi5: AND GRADING AND
PAVING AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-31
Item 5 - GROW WIRE ADDITION AT UELUENT PUMPS
The Contractor was directed to add additional ground wire between the four
influent pump motors and their associated pummp bases. The additional ground wire
was required to prevent pump hearing damage from stray ground wire currents
flowing between the influent pump and its motor. The additional ground wire was
not shown on the contract drawings. This item was negotiated with the Contractor
pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: FM #223
and PCH #128)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,985.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER r M: 0 Calendar Days
Item 6 - PLANT VMTER PIPING MODIFICATIONS
The plant water piping system at the wo sting grit chambers required modification
to accommodate the installation of the contract-specified stainless steel covers.
The plant water piping was not shown on the contract drawings and conflicted with
grit chamber cover installation. This item was negotiated with the Contractor
pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference:
FCO #220)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER r1EM: $ 398.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 7 - CHLORINE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install four 120-volt receptacles and
all associated conduit, wiring, electrical braces and terminations in the Chlorine
Building. These additional receptacles were required to supply a power source to
the contract-specified vacuum regulators on the chlorine system. Also included
in this item is the addition of relays in the chlorine control panel to modify
the circuitry of the motorized louvers and high pressure shutoff valves in the
Chlorine Building. These modifications were required to facilitate the proper
operation of the Chlorine Building's safety system in the event of a chlorine
leak. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section
10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 198 and 216, PCR 107)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE CRDER ITEM: $ 5,112.00
TIME EXTENLSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"H-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-3"
CCIMTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 7
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 Ei.r.rc AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VAUZY, CALIFC1W1A 92708
C8» ORDER
C. O. NO. Twenty-Nine (291
CONMRACTOR: Riewit Pacific Co. DATE June 13, 1990
JOB: HEAUKICRKS NO. 2 AT PLANT M. 1, JOB NO. P1-20; AND DEMLII,ITICN OF DIGESTERS
NCB. 1, 2 AND 4; REPLACEMIENT OF BOILER; PIPING CLFANOUTS; AND GRADING AND
PAVING AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-31
Item 8 - MODIFICATIONS TO STR[LMMAL TIE-IN AT THE NEW INLET CHANNEL
The Contractor was directed to revise the location and method for the tie-in of
the new inlet channel to the existing Metering and Diversion (M 6 D) Building.
The revision on included the construction of a concrete wall section after the
separation and disposal of the contract-specified removable wall panel on the
existing M 6 D Wilding. The construction of this relocated wall involved
a considerable amount of extra time and costs associated with work in a confined
space which would not have been experienced if the wall had been constructed in
the location shown on the contract plans. The wall relocation was required to
avoid conflict with the Ellis Avenue trunk line which was relocated at the
beginning of the project due to its conflict with the Sunflower Pump Station.
This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of
the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 92, PCS 60)
ADDED COST THLH CHARM ORDER ITEM: $ 13,384.00
TIME 1DCMNSICN THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
It® 9 - ADDED WORX AT THE EXISTING BEADhUHI6
The Contractor was directed to remove two existing aluminum slide gates and one
existing wooden stop log gate at the existing Headworks forebay and wet well
area. After the removal of the contract-specified bar screens, the referenced
gates served no function and could be a potential problem in the future if they
failed. The Districts, Mechanical Maintenance Department requested the gate to
be removed. The gates were not shown on the contract drawings to be remind.
This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of
the General Provisions. (Reference: ECO 225)
ADDED COST THIS Cmum ORDER ITEM: $ 3,054.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 10 - EXIST= HEADWORKS COVER PLATE REVISIONS
The Contractor was directed to make revisions to the cover plate support beams at
the existing Headworks. The support beam connections to other beams and to
ca_rete surfaces were required to be modified for completion of the work. As
shown on the contract drawings, a conflict existed between the -. of the beams
and the connection bolts. This item of work was negotiated with ae Contractor
pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the.General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 212)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,571.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"H-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-4"
COUNTY GanirrnmrON DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 7
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELL IS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CAUTORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. Twenty-Nine (291
CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE June 13, 1990
JOB: BEADWOM NO. 2 AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-20; AND DEMJLITICN OF DIGESTERS
NOS. 1, 2 AND 4; REPLACEMENT OF BOILER; PIPING CLEANOUTS; AND GRADING AND
PAVING AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-31
Item 11 - EXTRA FORK AT THE NEW INLET CHANNEL TIE-IN
The Contractor was required to evacuate the new inlet channel area during an
emergency flooding of the work area caused by the Districts' January 17, 1990
Metering and Diversion Structure gate failure. The extra costs involved with
this item included the removal of all work forces and equipment and added work to
rove debris and re-prepare areas for polyurethane coating and T-lock lining
repairs. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section
10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: ECO 214)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,221.95
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE CRDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 12 - SLWUX ER PUMP STATION COVER REVISIONS
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install hold dawn anchors on the lower'
inclined Sunflower Pump Station covers and add additional flanges to the foul air
piping. The installation as shown on the contract drawings required all covers
to be roved to access the lower horizontal section of the Sunflower screw puap.
The installation of hold down anchors on the lower inclined covers allowed for
individual cover removal and greatly reduced the time and effort involved with
maintenance on the lower portion of the screw pump. This item was negotiated
with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions.
(Reference: ECO 218 and 232, PCe 123)
ADDED CAST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITE14: $ 3,389.00
TIME EXTENSION IBIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"H-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-5"
COMM SANITATION DISTRICTS OF CHANGE COUNTY Page 6 of 7 ,
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 Fr-T c AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. Twenty-Nine (291
CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE June 13, 1990
JOB: BEADWORRS NO. 2 AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-20; AND DEMOLITION OF DIGESTERS
WFS. 1, 2 AND 4; FmAaEMENT OF BOILER; PIPING CIEAFAHTTS; AND GFADimG AND
PAVING AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-31
Item 13 - EIBC :+TCAL NODIFICATION AT PMER BUILDING 3A
The Contractor was directed to modify the electrical bus duct a: the standby
energency generators at Power Building 3A. As shown on the contract drawings, a
new tie bus was required to be incorporated in the existing electrical system in
Power wlildi 3A. The contract drawings also required the installation of new
2000-amp bus duct. The addition of the new tie bus resulted in a possibility of
experiencing 3000 amps of service at one time. This required the tie bus and
other contract-specified bus duct to be increased to a capacity of 3000 amp. The
majority of the changes involved with this item are associated with the
difference in costs of materials between 2000 and 3000 amp rapacity. The
remaining portion is associated with modifications to the existing system and
adjustments to the existing standby generator panel to accept the new larger
3000-anp bus. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant
to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 54,584.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $130,821.95
TOTAL TDO EXTENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be perforaad
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extension to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required
for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, imidertel or consequential
costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor.
"H-6" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-6"
COUNTY SANI=CN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 7 of 7
�i P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 TITT S AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CAL'4URNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. Twenty-Nine (29)
CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE June 13, 1990
JOB: HEA1T,i0RKS NO. 2 AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-20: AND DEY1O TTDN OF DIGESTERS
NOS. 1, 2 AND 4; REPIACE OU OF BOILER; PIPING CLEANOUTS; AND GRADING AND
PAVING AT PIANP NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-31
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date October 21, 1987
Original Contract Time 920 Calendar Days
Original Ccupletion Date April 27, 1990
Tice Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Time Extension 63 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 983 Calendar Days
Revised Ccupletion Date June 29, 1990
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Actual Final Ccupletion Date Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 31,458,000.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 2,336,682.66
This Change (Add) (fit) $ 130,821.95
Amended Contract Price $ 33,925,504.61
Board Authorization Date; June 13, 1990
COUNTY SANIT!ATICN DISTRICTS OF
OFP. M COMM, CAISFORNIA
C
Co6etruction Manager Date
KID= PACIFIC CO.
ACCEPTED BY: , APPIa�A'N BY:
Can-tx� Date Director of Engineering Date
"H-7" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-7"
COONN QTTTT MCN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 2
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 FELTS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFTXAIIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. One (1)
CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors. Division of DATE June 13, 1990
Zurn Constructors, Inc.
JOB: SLUDGE HANDLING FACILITIES AT ROCIA MON PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-2.
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 104,883.45
in accordance with contract provisions, the fol-laAng changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authnr;>ad and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 CONSTRUCTICN OF UNDERG17LU D 12KV SERVICE FOR NEW SERVICE CENTER
This change order item provides for the construction of an underground 12KV
service in lieu of the partially overhead system originally specified to provide
electrical power to the new 12KV service center. The original plan calls for
the new service to be Connected to a utility pole on Garfield Avenue and carried
overhead to a new utility pole at the east side of the new 12KV service center.
The service would have then gone underground and entered the Past side of the
new facility. This plan was in conflict with the future plans of Southern
California Edison and the cities of Huntington. Beach and Fountain Valley for
the improvements along r afield Avenue. This item was negotiated with the
Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 104,883.45
ME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER IIEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 104,883.45
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that n0 time is required
for this Change order, and no d z a:t or indirect, incidental or consequential
costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor,
except as expressly granted and armroved by this Change Order.
"I-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(h)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "I 1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S OF CRALRE COUNFY Page 2 of 2
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 R1.1 S AVENUE
FOU1n%IN VATSd;Y, CAL IMINIA 92708
CBANSE ORDER
C. 0. NO. One (1)
CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE June 13, 1990
Zurn Constructors, Inc.
JOB: SLUDGE HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECCAtMTiON PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-2.
SUMhIIiRY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date August 1, 1989
Original Contract Time 600 Calendar Days
Original Coupletion Date March 23, 1991
Time Extension This C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Time Extension 0 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 600 Calendar Days
Revised Coupletion Date March 23, 1991
Actual Final Coupletion Date Not Applicable
Tice Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 19,085,600.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00
This Change (Add) (Deduct-) $ 104,883.45
Amended Contract.Price $ 19,190,483.45
Board Authorization Date: June 13, 1990
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECCH E= BY:
Construction lenager Data
ADVANC) CONSTRUCTORS, DIVISION OF
ZURN CARS, INC.
AOCEPM) BY: APPROM BY:
CoNUU. Date Wmect„r of Engineering Date
"I-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(h)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-2"
OOUN Y SANI a ICN DISMICTS OF CRANGE COMM Page 1 of 2
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 EGLJH AVENGE
FaMMIN VALLEY, CAISEORuM 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. Two (2)
CONTRAL.'ICR: Advanco Constructors. Division of DATE June 13, 1990
Zurn Constructors, Inc.
JOB: SLUDGE HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECIANATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-2.
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (£edac.L) $ 132,628.20
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract cork are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 MODIFICATIONS TO NOW 12KV SERVICE CENM SWITCHGEAR
The 12XV service center odtchgear (approved by the Districts on March 6, 1990
and released for manufacture by the Contractor soon after) was stopped in
manufacture. The Contractor is directed to modify the switchgear, allowing for
future cogeneration facility and interconnection and coordination with Southern
California Edison's protective system.
This change order provides for complete differential bus protection for both
service center s tchgear lineups, installation of potential transformers for
future cogeneration facility synchmnizinx circuit, installatim of current
transformers for future differential bus protection system and installation of
current transformers to operate future ovP.mnaent relays. This work was
negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General
Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHALICE ORDER MEM: $ 132,628.20
TINL EXIE SION THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 132,628.20
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and arty extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
,md Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required
fo: this Change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential
costs, expenses, losses an damages have been will be incurred by Contractor,
except expressly granted and approved by
"J-1" this Change Order-
AGENDA ITEM #9(h)(2) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OFMGE COUNTY Page 2 of 2
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 EIT.TC AVENUE
FODNTAIN VALLEY, allaEMUM 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. Two (2)
CONTRA=: Advanoo Constructors, Division of DATE June 13, 1990
Zurn Constructors, Inc.
JOB: SLUDGE HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PIANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-2.
SWUff OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date August 1, 1989
Original Contract Time 600 Calendar Hays
Original Completion Date March 23, 1991
Time Extension This C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Time Extension 0 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Tine 600 Calendar Days
Revised Completion Date March 23, 1991
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Time subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 19,085,600.00
Prey. Anth. Changes $ 104,883.45
This Change (Add) (Aadvc4:) $ 132,628.20
Amended Contract Price $ 19.323,111.65
Board Authorization Date: June 13, 1990
COMM SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CUIFOUIIA
RECOMMENDED BY:
Constriction Manager Date
ADVANCO CONSTRU TORS, DIVISION OF
ZURN CONSTRUCTORS, INC.
ACCEPTED BY: APPROVED BY: ..
Contractc Date Director of Engineering Date
"J-2" AGENDA ITEM M9(h) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 6 _
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 IKET S AVENUE
MUN AIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 92708 �.✓
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. Eight (8)
CONTRACTOR: 21ESARIH & ALPER DATE June 13, 1990
JOB: M SCEIIAMM WDIFiCATSONS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT TREA'IDM
PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-37
Ai t of this Change Order (Add) (Dedurk) $ 29,190.00
in accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 - SUPPORTS FOR NEW SLUICE GATES AT PFTANZ BEADMIU(S
The contract do=nents called for the reuse of the existing sluice gate operator
supports when installing the new sluice gates at Pflanz Headxnrks. When details
of the new, gates and operators were developed by the manufacturer based on
Districts' criteria, the existing operator supports were found to be inadequate
in size and too deteriorated for reuse. This change order item provides for the
replacement of the existing supports with new units that were engineered to
match the size of the new gate operator and the lifting requirements of the new
sluice gates. Cost of the new supports was negotiated with the Contractor
pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(A) of the General Provision.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,430.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 - ADDITIONAL PIPING FOR knURE "A" AND "B" DIGP.S"1'ER GAS COMPRESSORS
It is the Districts' intent under a future construction contract to install a
gas carpressor or gas ccapressors on the roof of "A" and "B" digester pmlp roan
for use in association with the new cogeneration facilities at Plant No. 2.
This change order item provides for the installation of additional pipe,
fittings and valves in the existing digester gas piping system at the roof of
"A" and "B" digester pLurp roan to accmmcdate the installation of future gas
cagpressors. Work was perfumed on a cost plus percentage basis pursuant to
Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 9,629.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"K-1" AGENDA ITEM #90 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-1"
COUNTY SANr=CN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE CO= Page 2 of 6
�../ P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 RrT•TR AVENUE
ELHIITPAIId VALLEY, CALUIORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Eight (8)
CONl'RACiC7R: 2IEBARTH S ALERR DATE June 13, 1990
JOB: ryDerELranmfM NDDIFICATIONTS AND IIIPADVEMENIS TO FACR rrrES AT TREATMENT
PIANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-37
Item 3 - VENTING OF CHLOR-ALERT ALARM PANEL ENCLOSURES
The seven chlor-alert alarm panels were installed in gas-tight fiberglass
enclosures to protect the units from the corrosive Plant No. 2 atmosphere. The
operation of the chlor-alert device is to sample air from a defined area and
purge the sample back into the space adjacent to the chlor-alert device. As the
protective fiberglass enclosure was gas-tight the sampling mechanism in the
chlor-alert pressurized the enclosure and the sampling mechanism malfunctioned.
This change order item provides for the installation of vents in the protective
fiberglass enclosures to allow the chlor-alert sampling device to operate as
designed. Work was performed on a lump sum basis pursuant to Section
10-6(b)2(A) of the General Provisions.
ADDED C0Rr TffiS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 775.00
TIME EXE&SION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 4 - WALKWAY CBMIGES AT NEW RAW SEWAGE POWER BUILDING
The nest side of the new Raw Sewage Power Building was detailed to be built with a
set back of 4'-0" from the inside curb of the adjacent roadway. An existing
high voltage durtbank interfered with the construction of footings for the west
wall at the specified location. The building was set back 10'-0" from the roadway
to clear the existing ducthank and the walkway widened to correspond with the new
set hack. In addition to the added width of the walkway, existing irrigation
piping and controls had to be moved to eliminate interferences at new building
entrances. Work was performed on a Force Account Pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B
of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ZTEM: $ 4,194.00
TIME EMENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"K-2" AGENDA ITEM #9( 1 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-2"
COZNTY SAWBUTON DISTRICTS OF ORANGE CCCWX C Page 3 of 6
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 WEI AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. Eight (8)
CONnQDT01t: ZIEBAETH & ALPER DATE June 13, 1990
JOB: MISCELLANEOUS MODIFICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILI7gB AT TREATMENT
PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-37
Item 5 - MODIFICATIONS TO TRIAL POLYMER STORAGE TANS AMID DELETION OF BUBBLER
LEVEL CONTROL SYSTEM
The specified coating for the trial polymer storage tank was changed from gel coat
to aliphatic polyester polyurethane semi-gloss enamel to provide a more durable
exterior coating and minimize maintenance costs. A non-skid walking surface was
applied to the top of the new tank to eliminate the slipping hazard.
During the time between the design and implementation of work on the P2-37
contract, the Districts found it necessary to overhaul the existing polymer
storage tank bubbler level control systems and the ferric chloride flow control
systems. Equipment replaced by the Districts was also called out in the P2-37
contract for replacement. Equipment purchased by the Contractor for the above
items of work %as turned over to the Districts and the installation of same was
deleted.
The net credit for this change order item was computed on a lump sum basis
pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)(A) of the General Provisoes.
AMOUNT OF CREDIT FOR THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (6,224.00)
TINE EXTENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 6 - PIPING AMID DRAINAGE CHANGES AT FERRIC CHLORIDE FACII=
The existing Ferric Chloride Facility at Headworks "C" is adjacent to the new
Conveyor Building being built by the P2-37 Contractor. Portions of the ferric
chloride process piping and tank drain piping interfered with the construction
of the north wall of the conveyor building. This change order provides for the
re-piping of ferric chloride piping and for the modification of tank drains and
vents to eliminate interference with the new Conveyor Building. .Work was
performed on a Force Account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General
Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,460.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"K-3" AGENDA ITEM #9( 1 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 6
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIH AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALITIORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Eight (8)
CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH & ALPER DATE June 13, 1990
JOB: MLSCELIANEO S NODIFTCATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT TREAH4eNT
PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-37
Item 7 - ELECTRICAL POWER FOR CHLCRTNR. SOLUTION METERS
Electrical power to operate the new transmitters for the two chlorine solution
meters installed by the P2-37 Contractor in the Rollins Tunnel was
inadvertently anitted from the specifications. This change on a item provides
for power circuitry to the two transmitters. Work was perfumed on a Lump
Sum Basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHAtM ORDER II M1: $ 468.00
7TME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 8 - RE[OCACICN OF VFD REACTORS - WASTE ACTIVATED SIUDGE PUMPS
The reactors for the variable frequency drives (VED) at each waste activated
sludge pump control room were to be mounted on the floor. Installations of
other electrical equipment subsequent to design eliminated the apace proposed for
reactor installation. This change order item provides for the installation of
the two reactors on the will of each pump control room. Work was performed on
a Lump Sum Basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisoes.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,527.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER TTIIA: 0 Calendar Days
Item 9 - REMOVAL OF CHIORINE SOLUTION b1ETERING SYSTEMS,
The two chlorine solution orifice plate type metering systems installed in the
tunnel adjacent to the Plant 2 Chlorine Facility did not operate as intended.
When installed according to the specificati.ans the restriction created by the
orifice plates caused the associated chlorinators to malfunction. As a result
of the chlorinator malfunction the chlorine solution was weakened and could not
provide the level of chlorine required for the treatment process. This change
order item provides for the removal of the pipeline metering devices and returns
the solution piping back to its original condition. Work was performed on a
Force Account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,596.00
TIME F)MNSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"K-4" AGENDA ITEM #9( i ) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-4"
COMM SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUM Page 5 of 6
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE ---
ECAIITtA' N VALLEY, allalMOUA 92708 �r
CHANCE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Eight (8)
CONTRACTOR: ZIEEARIH & ALPER DATE June 13, 1990
JOB: MISCE[IANBOUS MODIFICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT TREATMENT
PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-37
Item 10 - ADDITIONAL PIPE REPIALEMAENf AT EXISTING BELT PRESSES
At each of the ten existing belt presses at the Plant 2 Dewatering Facility the
Contractor installed new p ller meters to allow the Districts to regulate
and measure the flow of wasdmater. The existing washwater piping system was
fabricated with galvanized steel pipe and was seriously deteriorated. During
the installation of the new meter header piping that was installed in the
existing washmater piping system the Contractor had to replace additional
port;io:s of the existing system as it was too deteriorated for reuse. This
change order item provides for the replacement of additional pipe, valves and
fittings at each of the ten belt presses that were not suitable for reuse. Work
was performed on a Fbrce Account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General
Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,335.00
TDZ EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOM ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 29,190.00
TOTAL TIM EKIEiION THIS CHANCE CRUER: 0 Calendar Days
The additional work container within this Change Order can be performed
incidental. to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It i-- therefore mutually agreed that no time is required
for this Change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential
costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor,
except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order.
SLI49W OF DIGESTER MILESTONE TIME
Original Activity Start Date November 2, 1988
Original Activity Duration 300 Calendar Days
Original Activity Ccmpletlo: Date August 28, 1989
Adjustment Milestone Tice This Change Order 0 Calendar Days
Total Adjustent Milestone Time 6 Calendar Days
Revised Activity Duration 306 Calendar Days
Revised Milestone Date September 3, 1989
"K-5" AGENDA ITEM ii9( 1 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-5"
COMM SANm kTICN DL=CTS OF ORANGE COUNM Page 6 of 6
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLLS AVENUE
FaMAIN VALLEY, xaT.Tsrm A 92708
ORANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. Eight (8)
CONiFP=: ZIE AlM & ALPER DATE June 13, 1990
JOB: M SCELLANEOUS WDIFICATIONS AND IDIPROMEXIM 7O FACILITIES AT TREATMENT
PIKE NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-37
SED69 Y OF CCUTR%.T TDIE
Original Contract Date November 2, 1988
Original Contract Time 425 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date December 31, 1989
Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 129 Caleb Days
Revised Contract Time 554 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date May 9, 1990
Actual Final Coupletiot Date Not Applicable
Time Subject to rLiqudara Images Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 5,395,000.00
Prey. Auth. Changes $ 349,374.29
This Change (Add) ( ) $ 29,190.00
Amended Contract Price $ 5,773,564.29
Board Authar.zatiaa Date: June 13, 1990
COUNTY SANr=CN DISTRICTS OF
OXWN, CALIFC RN1A
(I BY:
Construction Manager Date
Z)EBARTB & ALPER
ACCEPTED BY: APPROVED BY:
k Date nuectar of Erring Date
"K-6" AGENDA ITEM #9( 1) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-6"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA _
P.O. BOX 0127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 ` I
N 108{4 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 �Er�
II �NOECWn'II (Tt{)962-2411
ii
May 23, 1990
Board of Directors
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018
Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for User and Connection Fee Study with
James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers Inc.
In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional
services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with James M.
Montgomery Consulting Engineers Inc. for the preparation of a user and
connection fee study, on an hourly-rate basis including labor plus overhead,
plus direct expenses, subconsulta7rts fees and fixed profit, in an amount not to
exceed $89,549.00.
Professional. Services, (hourly rates
including labor plus overhead
at 1748), not to exceed $66,517.00
Direct Expenses, not to end 4,600.00
Suhconsultannt Fees, not to exceed 5,000.00
Fixed Profit 13,432.00
TOTAL CONMACT, not to exceed $89,549.00
The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee
as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not
result in excessive profits for the consultant.
/s/A. B. Catlin /s/William Mahoney
A. B. Catlin William Mahoney
Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman
Selection Committee Selection Committee
/s/Don R. Griffin /s/Don E. Smith
Don R. Griffin Don E. Smith
Past Joint Chairman Past Joint chairman
Selection Committee Selection Committee
/s/Gary G. Streed /s/Thomas M. Dawes ^
Gary G. Streed Thomas M. Daces
Director of Finance Director of Engineering
Selection Committee Selection Committee
"L" AGENDA ITEM #9(k) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "L"
RESOLUTION NO. 90-54
APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH JAMES M. MONTGOMERY CONSULTING E G NE R
INC. TO CONO A TUDY OF UbtK LAILUUNItb F
ESTABLISHING CONNECTION FEE AND USE FEE A
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH JAMES M. MONTGOMERY CONSULTING
ENGINEERS, INC. TO CONDUCT A STUDY OF USER
CATEGORIES FOR ESTABLISHING RATES FOR DISTRICTS'
ONE-TIME CONNECTION FEES AND ANNUAL USE FEES
■ t s t f : . : : x : a p t
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2,
3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy
establishing procedures for the selection of professional engineering and
architectural services; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with
James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers, Inc. to conduct a study of user
categories for establishing rates for Districts' one-time connection fees and
annual use fees; and,
WHEREAS, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures,
has negotiated and certified the final negotiated fee for said services.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Professional Services Agreement dated June 13,
1990, by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13
and 14 and James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers, Inc. , to conduct a study of
user categories for establishing rates for Districts' one-time connection fees
and annual use fees, is hereby approved and accepted; and,
"M-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(k)(2) - ALL DISTRICTS "M-1"
Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance
with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows:
Professional Services, at hourly
rates for labor pies overhead
at 174%, not to exceed $ E3,517.00
Direct Expenses, not to exceed 4,600.00
Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 5,000.00
Fixed Profit 13,432.00
TOTAL AMOUNT, not to exceed $ 89,549.OD
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1 are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said agreement, on behalf of itself and as agent
for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, in form approved
by the General .
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 13, 1990.
"M-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(k) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "M-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-6127
108"ELLIS,FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
^"ce cW (714) 982-2411
FAX(714)982-0356
I
li
May 23, 1990
Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018
Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum No. 1 to the
Professional Services Agreement with Martin 8, Kordick, Sr. for
Specialized Inspection Services in Connection with construction of
Various Master-Planned Projects
In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional
services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with
Martin Kordick, Sr. for Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services
Agreement for specialized construction inspection services on master-planned
construction projects, at hourly rates, plus mileage for on-the-job travel,
for a two-year period beginning August 10, 1990.
Construction Inspection Services,
at the hourly rate of $40.00 for the first year
$42.50 for the second year
The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as
reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not
result in excessive profits for the consultant.
/s/A. B. Catlin /s/william Mahoney
A. B. Catlin William Mahoney
Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman
Selection Committee Selection Committee
/s/Don R. Griffin /s/Don E. Smith
Don R. Griffin Don E. Smith
Past Joint Chairman Past Joint Chairman
Selection Ccmmittee Selection Committee
/s/Thomas M. Dawes
Thomas M. Dawes
Director of Engineering
Selection Committee
"N" AGENDA ITEM #9( l ) (1) z ALL DISTRICTS "N"
RESOLUTION NO. 90-55 _
APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH MARTIN KORDICK SR. FOR SPECIALIZED
N TRU TIN N PE N bEKVR!;F5 RE VAKIUUbTER-
PLANNED CONSTRUCTION
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S. 6, 7,
11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALiFORNIA, APPROVING
ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH MARTIN KORDICK, SR. FOR SPECIALIZED CONSTRUCTION
INSPECTION SERVICES RE VARIOUS MASTER-PLANNED
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS, PROVIDING FOR EXTENSION OF
SAID AGREEMENT AND INCREASING THE HOURLY RATE
R f 1 t 1 ! R 1 ► ! t t R � � 1 R
WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into a Professional
Services Agreement with Martin Kordick, Sr. for specialized construction
Inspection services re various master-planned construction projects; and,
WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to amend the agreement with Martin
Kordick, Sr. to provide for extension of said agreement for an additional
two-year period and to increase the hourly rate for said services.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Addendum No. 1 dated June 13, 1990, to that certain
Professional Services Agreement dated August 10, 1988, by and between County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 29 3, 5, 6, 79 11, 13 and 14 and Martin Kordick,
Sr. , for specialized construction inspection services re various master-planned
construction projects, on an as-needed basis, providing for extension of said
agreement for for a two-year period beginning August 10, 1990, is hereby
approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That payment for said additional services is hereby authorized
at the hourly rate of $40.00 for the first year beginning..August 10, 1990, and
110-1" AGENDA ITEM #9( 1 ) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-1"
$42.50 for the second year beginning August 10, 1991, plus mileage reimbursement
for on-the-job travel : and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for
itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 1 in form approved by the
General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 13, 1990.
"0-2" AGENDA ITEM #9( I ) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-2"
COUNTY SANITAXION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE CMM Page 1 of 5
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 RTT,TR AVENUE
ECUNTAIN VALLEY, CAIIFaWIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Seven (7)
OONLRACTOR: W. H. Ebert Corp. DATE June 13, 1990
JOB: Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer. between Edinger Avenue and Lamson
Avenue. Contract No. 2-26-2 and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road
between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 56.773.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Contract No. 2-26-2.
Item 1 CHANGE TRAFFIC PLAN
The Contractor was directed to change the traffic detour plan at the intersection
of Euclid Street and McFadden Avenue. Due to the large excavation for a structure
at Station No. 10+50, southboud traffic on Euclid Street could not pass safely.
Therefore, the southbound traffic was detoured to the west at McFadden Avenue.
The new detour included costs for engineering, signs, traffic control and labor.
This item was acccnplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section
10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST TBIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 9,103.00
TIME EXTENSION TBIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 PR40VE DID RAIIRGAD CROSSING
The Contractor was directed to excavate and remove a portion of the old railroad
Embankment at Station No. 89+00 on Nelson Street. The original alignaeut of the
new sewer line on Nelson Street bypassed the remaining portion of the old
enbarknent. The sewer alignment was changed when the City could not provide the
right-of-way. The new sewer alignment passed through the embankwnt which then
had to be renoved. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account
pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,941.00
TINE EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"P-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(p) (1) - DISTRICT 2 "P .1"
COUNTY SANM=CN nra:wrrrc OF CRAB comer Page 2 of 5
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 RUT AVENUE
EX71AII7 VALLEY, OLIE UM 92708
CHANGE ORUM
C. 0. NO. Seven (7)
CCNTRACTM: W. H. Ebert Corp. DATE June 13, 1990
jcB: Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Ed nnnr Avenue and Ianmson
Avemre, Contract No. 2-26-2 and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road
between Euclid Street and Walnut Street. Contract No. 2-27
Item 3 EQNI WNT STANDBY
The Contractor was directed to stop work between 11-03-89 and 11-10-89 on Nelson
Street. Certain utilities had to be relocated prior to excavation for the new
sewer line. One of the utilities which bad to be relocated by others was the
Southern California Gas Co. This delay was caused by Southern California Gas Co.
who'was behind schedule in relocating this 3-inch gas main between Stanford Avenue
and Lampson Avenue on Nelson Street. The Contractor's standby changes are for
four pieces of major equipment which could not be used elsewhere on the project.
There are no labor costs irnrolved. This item was negotiated with the Contractor
pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CERISE CHUM ITEM: $ 15,912.00
TIME EXTEHSICN THIS CBANGE CRDER ITEM: 6 Calendar Days
Item 4 UNDISCLOSED nr IEXTraa
The Contractor enncomtered several undisclosed utilities at various locations
while excavating for the new seder line. The Contractor was directed to
investigate and excavate around the undisclosed utilities and to make the
necessary repairs. Ebllowing is a tabulation of the additional work:
location (Sta. No.) Amount
37+25 30 CMP Culvert $ 1,418.00
10+50 S 119+00 Traffic detector loops 5,106.00
47+46 Abandoned Sub-surface manhole 509.00
50+20 Abandoned 30-inch Stour Drain 853.00
51+00 Concrete-encased telephone duct 2,537.00
54+40 Electrical and telephone conduits 2,533.00
55+19 6-inch water line 1,267.00
4-inch sewer laterals at 9 stations
in various locations 1,642.00
6-inch sewer laterals at two
locations 595.00
$ 16,460.00
This item was a=zplishad by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section
10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANCE CRDER MM: $ 16,460.00
TINE EXTENSION THIS CHANGE CRIM ITEM: 4 Calendar Days
"P-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(p) (1) - DISTRICT 2 "P-2"
COMM SANITMUN DISTRICTS OF CHANGE COUNPY Page 3 of 5
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 EGT.TR AVENUE
EDIRM IN VALLEY, CUaFCRN A 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. Seven (7)
CONTRAC1C7R: W. H. Ebert Coro. DATE June 13, 1990
JOB: Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and Lanpscn
Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2 and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road
between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27
Item 5 RENDVE UNDIRCLOSEn SUB-SURFACE CONCRETE
The Contractor encountered undisclosed sub-surface concrete while excavating for
the new manhole and pipe at Station No. 10+45. The Contractor was directed to
remove and dispose of the buried concrete which interfered with the execution and
construction of the new manhole. This item was acoomplished by Contractor's force
account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED CST THIS CHANGE ORDER PPEM: $ 1,935.00
TIM EMENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 6 IMMILL ADZ VACUUM RUIEASR VALVES
The Contractor was directed to Install air vacs on a relocated 8-inch dater
line. The dater line had to be relocated in order to excavate and construct the
new seer line in the specified alignment between Station No. 37+00 and Station
No. 44+35 on Taft Avenue. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force
account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,300.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 7 8-INCH SEWER BYPASS
The Contractor was r Mired to bypass an existing 8-inch sewer during the
construction of the new sewer line and manhole at Station No. 49+15. The bypass
was intended to be hooked into the new sewer line while constructing the manhole.
However, the flows from the bypass could not be put into the new sewer line. The
bypass was required to be extended approximately 35 feet to another manhole. This
change order item consists of costs for the added material only. This item was
acoomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the
General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER PPEM: $ 1,295.00
TIME E,XTENSICN THIS CHANGE ORDER TPEM: 0 Calendar Days
"P-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(p) (1) - DISTRICT 2 "P-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 5
U P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ECT.rR AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALNPORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. Seven M
CONTRA=: W. H. Ebert Corp. DATE June 13, 1990
JOB: Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and Lamoson
Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2 and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road
between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27
Item 8 REPLACE 4-INCH WATER I.II�
The Contractor was directed to remove and replace a«rcximately 30 feet of 4-inch
water line on Nelson Street at Station No. 93+45. The City of Garden Grove
requested that the District's Contractor acccuplish this added work during the
construction of the new sewer line. The cost of this item will be reimbursed by
the City. This item was accouplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to
Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,161.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 9 FUN BYPASSES
The Contractor was directed to remove two sewer bypasses which were not included
in the contract. The bypasses were installed on upper reaches of the new, Euclid
Street trunk sewer on two previous contracts. Now that the lower reach of the new
sewer line is complete, flows can be released into the new line. The removal of
the bypasses had to be accomplished at night during low flows. This item was
acconplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the
General Provisions.
ADDED OUST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,666.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER TI M: 2 Calendar Days
TOM ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 56,773.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 12 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be perfumed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Tice made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 12 days' extension
of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no
direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or
damages have been or will be mourned by Contractor, except as expressly granted
and approved by this Change Order.
"P-4" AGENDA ITEM #90)(1) - DISTRICT 2 P-4"
COUNM SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTr Page 5 of 5
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 SLiSS AVE=
FO WMW VALLEY, CMXFMITn 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. Seven (7)
CONJRAC10R: W. H. Ebert Corp. DATE June 13, 1990
JOB: Portion of Euclid Interceptor Seiner, between Edinger Avenue and Lm=m
Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2 and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road
between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27
SUN>MARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date March 22, 1989
Original Contract Tim 365 Calendar Days -
Original Completion Date March 22, 1990
Time Extension this C.O. 12 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 73 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Tim 438 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date June 3, 1990
Actual Final Completion Date Not applicable
Tine Subject to Liquidated Damages Not applicable
Original Contract Price $ 9,242,538.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 493,187.00
This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 56,773.00
Amended Contract Price $ 9,792,498.00
Board Authorization Date: June 13, 1990
COUNIR SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORA= COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
AECID BY:
Construction Manager Date
W. H. EBERT CORP.
ACCEPTED APPitO<JED BY:
/j
on actor Date Director of Engineermg Date
"P-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(p)(1 ) - DISTRICT 2 "P-5"
COM= SANITATION DISMCTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 EC.r.Tc AVENUE
PU MMON VALLEY, CAlSFD UM 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Eight (8)
CONTRACTOR: W. H. Ebert Coro. DATE June 13. 1990
JOB: Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and Lmpson
Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2 and South Anaheim Relief Sewer. on Ball Road
between Euclid Street and Walnut Street. Contract No. 2-27
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Beduct) $ 270,519.30
In accordance with cmtract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ADJUSTMENT OF ENG11>BE[2'S QUANTITIES
ADD:
Change in
Item Quantity
No. Unit Description Fran To Difference
6 VF 72-inch Manholes 81 86.0 5.00@ $ 750.00 = $ 3,750.00
(2-27)
12 TON Aggregate Base 1600 2713.0 1113.00@ 10.00 = 11,130.00
(2-27)
23 VF 72-inch Manholes 17 19.60 2.60@ 1200.00 = 3,120.00
64 TON Asphalt Concrete 13,800 19,208.91 5408.91@ 30.00 = 162,267.30
65 TON Aggregate Base 27,000 35,259.00 8259.00@ 8.00 = 66,072.00
66 LF Curb and (Utter 910 1,260.00 350.00@ 30.00 = 10,500.00
67 SP Drivecrays 2,020 3,115.00 1095.00@ 14.00 = 15,330.00
SUBTOTAL $272,169.30
DEDUCT-
Change in
Item Quantity
No Unit Description Fran To Difference
30 EA. Field Closure 3 2 (1650.00)
SUBTOTAL ( 1,650.00)
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANM ORDER $270,519.30
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
"0-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(p) (2) - DISTRICT 2 "0 1"
OODNN SAWIM rON DISMCTS OF ORWM Q70NTY Page 2 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 EDLIS AVENGE
FSRINTA' N VALLEY, CALIFaVaA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Eight (8)
COM?ALTOR: W. R. Ebert Corn. DATE June 13. 1990
JOB: Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Fdinoer Avenue and Iampson
Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2 and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road
between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental
to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any
extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change
Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change
Ordcer, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses,
losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor.
SUKIP Y OF CONPRAC.T TIM
Original Contract Date March 22, 1989
Original Contract Time 365 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date March 22, 1990
Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 73 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 438 Days
Revised Final Completion Date June 3, 1990
Actual Final Completion Date June 3, 1990
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not applicable
Original Contract Price $ 9,242,538.00
Prey. Auth. Changes $ 549,960.00
This Change (Add) (Dedwt) $ 270,519.30
Amended Contract Price $10,063,017.30
"Q-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(p)(2) - DISTRICT 2 "0-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Eight (8)
CONTRACTOR: W. H. Ebert Corp. DATE June
JOB: Portion of Euclid Interce for Sewer between Edin er Avenue and Lam son
Avenue, Contract o. an ou na e m e e ewer on a oa
etween Euclid Street an a nut treet, Contract No. 2-27
Board Authorization Date: June 13, 1990
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDED BY:
on�rucflon manager Date
W.H. EBERT CORP.
ACCEPTED BY: APPRO BY:
GrT' � ti a /;: .,-,z�wi^t.i (l. il!!f. �
ntrac a e t rector of Engineering a e
V
"Q 4, AGENDA ITEM #9(p) (2) - DISTRICT 2 "0-3"
s .
RESOLUTION NO. 90-59-2
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NOS. 2-26-2 AND 2-27
A MPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 'OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING PORTION OF EUCLID INTERCEPTUR
SEWER, BETWEEN EDINGER AVENUE AND LAMPSON AVENUE,
CONTRACT NO. 2-26-2, AND SOUTH ANAHEIM RELIEF SEWER,
ON BALL ROAD BETWEEN EUCLID STREET AND WALNUT STREET,
CONTRACT NO. 2-27, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL
CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor. W. H. Ebert Corp. , has completed the
construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Portion of Euclid
Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and Lampson Avenue, Contract
No. 2-26-2, and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road between Euclid Street
and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27, on April 23, 1990; and,
Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Director of Engineering has
recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with
the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and
ordered filed; and,
Section 3. That Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger
Avenue and Lampson Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2, and South Anaheim Relief Sewer,
on Ball Road between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27, is
hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract
therefor, dated March 22, 1989; and,
Section 4. That the Districts' Director of Engineering is hereby
"R 1" AGENDA ITEM #9(p) (3) - DISTRICT 2 "R-1"
authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with W. H. Ebert Corp.
setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Portion of Euclid
Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and Lampson Avenue, Contract
No. 2-26-2, and South Anaheim Relief Sewer on Ball Road between Euclid Street
and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27, is hereby approve] and accepted in form
approved by the General Counsel ; and,
Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 2 are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 13, 1990.
"R-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(P)(3) - DISTRICT 2 "R-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 90-60-2
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
CONTRACT NOS. 2-26-3. 2-28 AND 2-29
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR PORTION OF EUCLID INTERCEPTOR SEWER, BETWEEN
BROADWAY AND ORANGETHORPE AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 2-26-3;
KATELLA RELIEF SEWER, FETWEEN EUCLID STREET AND WALNUT
STREET, CONTRACT NO. 2-28; AND ORANGEWOOD DIVERSION
SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-29
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
WHEREAS, Willdan Associates, District's engineers, have completed
preparation of the plans and specifications for Portion of Euclid Interceptor
Sewer, Between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-3; Katella
Relief Sewer, Between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-28; and
Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the project for construction of Portion of Euclid
Interceptor Sewer, Between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract
No. 2-26-3; Katella Relief Sewer, Between Euclid Street and Walnut Street,
Contract No. 2-28; and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29, is hereby
approved. Said project was included in the Final Focused Environmental Impact
Report on Amendment No. 1 to the Consolidated Master Plan of Treatment
Facilities for Districts Nos. 2, 3 and it relative to District No. 2
Euclid/Newhope-Placentia Drainage Area approved by the Board of Directors on
June 10, 1987. A Notice of Determination was filed by the Secretary on June 11,
1987, in accordance with the District's Guidelines Implementing the California
"S-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(q) - DISTRICT 2 "S-1"
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and,
`...� Section 2. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents
this day submittea to the Board of Directors by Willdan Associates, District's
engineers, for construction of Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, Between
Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-3; Katella Relief Sewer,
Between Euclid Street aid Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-28; and Orangewood
Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29, are hereby approved and adopted; and,
Section 3. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for
bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Public Contracts Code of
the State of California; and,
Section 4. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date
and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and,
Section 5. That the Secretary and the District's Director of Engineering
or. his designee be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of
Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 13, 1990.
"S-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(q) - DISTRICT 2 "S-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 90-61-2
APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH KRAEMER IMPERIAL ASSOCIATES
.. RELATIVE TO EXCHANGE EASEMENTS D AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF QUITCLAIM DEED RE CYPRESSAVENUE
SUBYIU K E!F—SSW K,CONIRAL;Y NU. Z-V/Z-UA—
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH KRAEMER IMPERIAL ASSOCIATES
RELATIVE TO EXCHANGE OF EASEMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH
REALIGNMENT OF A PORTION OF THE CYPRESS AVENUE
SUBTRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-9 (REALIGNED PORTION
ENTITLED 2-9A) , AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
CORPORATION QUITCLAIM DEED QUITCLAIMING DISTRICT'S
INTEREST IN A PORTION OF THE ORIGINAL SEWER LINE AND
EASEMENT THEREFOR FROM KRAEMER IMPERIAL ASSOCIATES
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Agreement dated June 13, 1990, by and
between County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County and Kraemer Imperial
Associates, relative to an easement required in connection with a realigned
portion of the Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9 (Realignment
entitled Contract No. 2-9A) , in exchange for a quitclaim deed quitclaiming the
District's interest in the original sewer line and easement therefor from
Kraemer Imperial Associates, is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the certain Corporation Quitclaim Deed dated June 13,
1990, wherein County Sanitation District No. 2 quitclaims to Kraemer Imperial
Associates the District's interest in a portion of the original sewer line and
20-foot wide easement therefor from Kraemer Imperial Associates, is hereby
approved and authorized; and,
Section 3. That the real property to be quitclaimed is more particularly
described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of
"T 1" AGENDA ITEM #9(r) - DISTRICT 2 "T-I"
this resolution; and,
Section 4. That said Quitclaim Deed is hereby granted at no cost to
Kraemer Imperial Associates; and,
Section 5. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 2 are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said Agreement and Corporation Quitclaim Deed
in form approved by the General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 13, 1990.
"T-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(r) - DISTRICT 2 "T-2"
GD&EDEVELOPMENT COMSULTANT& INC.
April 11, 1990
Mr. Gary Streed
Director of Finance
Orange County Sanitation Districts
P.O.Box 8127
Fountain Valley,California 92728-8127
Dear Mr.Streed:
In your letter of March 30, 1990 and telephone conversations you have stated that the
Orange County Sanitation Districts will be requesting a 100%pass-through with the
proposed Lincoln Avenue Redevelopment Project and Los Alamitos Race Track and
Golf Course Redevelopment Project, both in the City of Cypress. Based on the
numbers you supplied, the Redevelopment Agency is prepared to offer the Districts a
35% pass-through on the Los Alamitos Race Track and Golf Course Redevelopment
Project.
The percentage of pass-through was determined in the following manner:
The Districts stated that the cost in present day dollars to collect, treat and
dispose of the additional sewage generated by the Los Alamitos Race Track and
Golf Course Redevelopment Project when developed (over the next 12 years)
would be $41,532. If we are to increase that amount for inflation at 5% per year
(the assumption we used for our tax increment calculations), then the amount
would reach$74,586 in the year of projected buildout.
If we subtract the base year amount (the amount the Districts will continue to
receive throughout the life of the Project, or $18,885) from the inflated total we
show that the Districts require an additional $55,701 to meet the increased needs
of the Project area in year 12. -
150 W. first 61rccL 6uilc 280 ClaremonL CA 91711-4139 (714) 625-6734
"V 1"" AGENDA ITEM #9( t) (1 ) - DISTRICT 3 "V-1'"
Mr. Gary Streed
April 11, 1990
Page 2
The Orange County Sanitation Districts now receive 3.1% of the taxes generated
in the Project Area. Given the Districts' portion of the tax increment in year 12
(3.1%of$5,145,065, or$159,497),the additional amount required by the Districts
is approximately 35%of the total that is estimated to be generated by the Project.
This pass-through for the Los Alamitos Race Track and Golf Course Redevelopment
Project would be in lieu of the 2% annual inflationary increase that is specified in
California Health and Safety Code, Section 33676.
In order to maintain economic feasibility for the Lincoln Avenue Redevelopment
Project, the Cypress Redevelopment Agency is not offering the Districts any pass-
through for that Project. It is expected, however, that the Districts shall adopt a
resolution capturing the 2% inflationary increase in taxes for the Lincoln Avenue
Redevelopment Project.
If you have any questions about the calculations presented in this letter, or have any
comments on the negotiations,please do not hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
nc
Curtis Dale
Senior Associate
xc: Darrell Essex,City Manager
"V-2` AGENDA ITEM #9(t) (1) - DISTRICT 3 "V-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 90-62-3
�./ APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH THE CYPRESS
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH THE CYPRESS
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RE PAYMENT OF
PROPORTIONAL ANNUAL TAX INCREMENT TO
DISTRICT FOR SEWERAGE SERVICES
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
WHEREAS, the Cypress Redevelopment Agency has proposed the
Los Alamitos Race Track and Golf Course Redevelopment Project; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Community Redevelopment Law, California
Health and Safety Code Sections 33000 at sec . , the Sanitation
District' s ad valorem taxes in the redevelopment project area will
be frozen at the 1989-90 base year levy; all subsequent annual tax
increments accruing to the redevelopment agency during its life;
and,
WHEREAS, because the Sanitation District partially relies on
ad valorem taxes to finance the cost of sewerage services which are
escalating due to federally mandated requirements, energy impacts
and inflationary trends; and,
WHEREAS, recognizing that the freezing of taxes may result in
inadequate ad valorem tax revenues to cover the cost of providing
sewerage service to the redevelopment project areas, representatives
of the Cypress Redevelopment Agency have agreed to pay the District
thirty-five percent ( 35%) of its historical proportional share of
the annual tax increment accruing to the agency to defray the cost
of said service, on the same basis as other properties in the
`./ District.
"W-1'" AGENDA ITEM #9( t) (2) - DISTRICT 3 "W-1"
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 3 of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Agreement dated
by and between County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County and
the Cypress Redevelopment Agency, providing for payment to the -
District of thirty-five percent ( 35%) of its historical proportional
share of the annual tax increment from property in the proposed
Los Alamitos Race Track and Golf Course Redevelopment Project to pay
for escalating costs of sewerage service on the same basis as other
properties in the District, be, and is hereby, approved and
accepted; and,
Section 2. That the General Manager be, and is hereby,
authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of
District No. 3 in form approved by the General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 13, 1990.
"W-2" AGENDA ITEM #9( t ) (2) - DISTRICT 3 "W-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 90-63-3
ELECTING TAX INCREMENT PASS-THROUGH RE
�✓ LINCOLN AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ELECTING TAX
INCREMENT PASS-THROUGH RE LINCOLN
AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
k X k k k k k X k k k k k k k X
WHEREAS, the Cypress Redevelopment Agency is preparing a
Development Plan for the Lincoln Avenue Redevelopment Project
(the "Plan" ) , which provides for tax increment financing pursuant
to Health and Safety Code Section 33670; and,
WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. 3 (the "District" ) is an
affected taxing agency authorized to make the election described in
Health and Safety Code Section 33676.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 3 of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1: That the District elects to be allocated all of the
tax revenues attributable to increases in the rate of tax imposed
for the benefit of the District, which levy occurs after the tax
year in which the ordinance adopting the Plan becomes effective, and
elects to be allocated all of the tax revenues attributable to
increases in the assessed value of the taxable property in the
Lincoln Avenue Redevelopment Project Area, as the assessed value is
established by the assessment roll last equalized prior to the
effective date of the ordinance adopting the Plan pursuant to Health
and Safety Code Section 33670(a) , which are or otherwise would be,
calculated annually pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section
110.1 (f) .
"X 1" AGENDA ITEM a9(t)(3) - DISTRICT 3 "X-1"
Section 2: That the Board Secretary of the District is hereby
authorized and directed to transmit copies of this Resolution to the
appropriate officials and to �.ake all other actions required
pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33676 to implement the
election set forth in this Resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 13, 199o.
"X-2" AGENDA ITEM #9( t ) (3) - DISTRICT 3 "X-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 90-64-5
AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 5-35-1
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SOUTH COAST
TRUNK SEWER, PHASE I, CONTRACT NO. 5-35-1
f f f f f 1 f f Y f f f f f Y
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange
County California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the proposed construction contract is for a project which
is a portion of the previously-approved Master Plan Report for District No. 5
and the Southern Half of District No. 6. The project is to be constructed as
per the Master Plan approval. In accordance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and Section 15090 of the Districts' Guidelines,
a Final Environmental Impact Report covering this project was approved by the
Districts' Boards of Directors on June 13, 1984; and,
Section 2. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the
Board of Directors by the District's Director of Engineering that award of
contract be made to W. H. Ebert Corp• for South Coast Trunk Sewer, Phase I.
Contract No. 5-35-1, and bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are
hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 3. That the contract for South Coast Trunk Sewer, Phase I,
Contract No. 5-35-1, be awarded to W. H. Ebert Corp• in the total amount of
$880,066.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained
therein; and,
Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby
authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor
"Y 1" AGENDA ITEM #9(u)(2) - DISTRICT 5 "Y 1"
for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor,
in form approved by the General Counsel ; and,
,ection S. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 13, 1990.
1a.r�
"Y-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(u) (2) - DISTRICT 5 "Y-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
May 15, 1990 21 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
11:00 a.m.
1 ADDEND M +oau 2wa Avewu•
B I D TABULATION
w WMN VA62Y.MWORNIA W1204121
S EEET glA' A 211
CONTRACT NO. 5-35-1
PPLUECT TTTf.Tt South Coast Trunk Sewer, Phase I
PROMEL' DESCRi CN Construct approximately 4200 feet of 15- to 24-inch DIP
and VCP gravitV trunk sewer, manholes, stubs and laterals on the land side of
PCH from the city limits of Newport Beach southeast to just west of Los Trancos
narking lot
ENGINEER'S ESTE n'rr.: $1,290,000 BUDGET ANDIMT $1,400,000
(1989-90 Budget)
CONIRACTOR TOTAL BID
1. W. H. Ebert Corp. , San Jose, CA $ 880,066.00
2. Mike PrLich & Sons, South El Monte, CA $ 946,860.00
3. Colich & Sons (JV) , Gardena, CA $1,054,522.00
4. Kenko Inc. dba nrt rand & Assoc., CaYinana, CA $1,072,850.00
5. Peter C. David Co., 7nc., Garden Grove. CA $1,141,092.00
6. Silveri & LeBouef JV, Anaheim, CA $1,179,670.00*
7. Drainage Construction Co. , Inc., Vista, CA $1,261,912.00
B. C E Puny & Dewatering Corp. dba C R Construction $1,279,139.50*
Signal Hill, CA
9. Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Im., Sunland, CA $1,288,299.00
10. Miraonrtes Const. Co., Inc., Baldwin Park, CA $1,366,398.00
11. Steve Bubalo Construction Co. , Monrovia. CA $1,384,105.00
*Mathematical error—corrected total.
I have reviewed the proposals submitted-for the above project and find that the
low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, razcnclend award to W. H. Ebert
Corp. of San Jose, CA in the bid aupunt of $880,066.00 as the lowest and best
bid.
b.w,
Thomas M. Dawes
Director of EngirnesIng
"Y-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(u) (2) - DISTRICT 5 "Y-3" -
PCH SEWER CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
This Memorandum of Understanding is intcaded to set
forth certain understandings of The Irvine Company ("Company")
and County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California
("District") related to the construction, connection and timing
of certain sewer facilities to serve the Company's Newport Coast
Project.
The Company and the District desire to set forth their
understanding about the scheduling of construction of such sewer
facilities in order to minimize the impact of such construction
work upon residents, merchants and other users of Pacific Coast
Highway in a manner that is consistent with the spirit of
Resolution 88-121 (attached) of the City Council of the City of
Newport Beach ("City") .
THE BACKGROUND
Irvine Ranch Water District ("IRWD") is responsible for
providing local collector sewer service to the Company's Newport
Coast Project.
As part of the work required to serve IRWD and upgrade
the existing District system, the District will construct a
gravity sewer between the southerly City limits and Marguerite
Avenue to tie into the Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer. This sewer
project is designated by District as Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer,
Phase 3, Contract No. 5-34-3 (the "PCH Sewer Project") .
The Company, the District, the City and other parties
desire that the PCH Sewer Project have as little as possible
negative impact upon the residents and merchants of Corona Del
Mar ("CDM") and the other users of the affected section of PCH.
Of particular concern is the "CDM Commercial Area" which lies
along PCH and stretches from Marguerite Avenue to Seward Avenue.
As part of the Newport Coast Project, a new arterial
roadway known as Pelican Hill Road is being constructed including
a signal and appropriate signage at the intersection of Pelican
Hill Road and PCH. Upon the opening of Pelican Hill Road, it is
expected that traffic congestion will be reduced along PCH
through CDM. The City Council of the City of Newport Beach has
previously adopted Resolution 88-121 indicating the Council's
opposition to the commencement of the portion of the PCH Sewer
Project under PCH in CUM prior to the completion of Pelican Hill
Road through to Bonita Canyon Road.
Although the. provision of sewer service to the Newport
Coast Project is being undertaken by IRWD, IRWD is working
"Z 1" AGENDA ITEM #9(v) - DISTRICT 5 "Z 1"
closely with the District and the City to provide for the use by
IRWD of sewer facilities controlled by such 'agencies as part of
the overall sewer servicing plan fir the Newport Coast Project.
UNDERSTANDINGS
In light of the background described above, Company and
District hereby affirm their mutual understanding with respect to
the following key points:
*At the request of the City, no construction of the PCH
Sewer Project will be commenced prior to the opening of
the Pelican Hill Road and the commencement of operation
of the signal at the intersection of Pelican Hill Road
and PCH. Pelican Hill Road and signal are expected to
be open and operational by July 1, 1991.
*Subject to the receipt of necessary permits and any
other items which are beyond the control of the
District, the District plans anticipate that the PCH
Sewer Project will be bid and contract let prior to
July 1, 1991 in order to allow construction to commence
immediately upon the opening of Pelican Hill Road.
*The District estimates that the PCH Sewer Project
construction in the CDM Commercial Area will be
complete within 90 days after commencement.
*PCH Sewer Project construction is expected to begin in
July, 1991 and be complete in the CDM Commercial Area
by November 1, 1991.
*No construction of the PCH Sewer Project in the CDM
Commercial Area will take place during the Christmas
season from November 1 through January 1. PCH Sewer
Project construction is planned to continue from Seward
Avenue to the southerly City limits without such time
constraint.
*Some night construction work is anticipated in order
to minimize the duration of construction and negative
impact.
*The District will cooperate in obtaining City approval
of connection and capacity in the City sewer system to
accommodate IRWD service for the Newport Coast Project.
*To provide the Company with interim sewer connections
to insure timely capacity for the early phases of the
Newport Coast Project by February, 1991, the Company
will fund the design and construction of (i) the
interim pump station and the connection thereto at
2
"Z-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(v) - DISTRICT 5 "Z-2"
Garret and Cortland, (ii) the upgrade of the CUM Pump
Station at Poppy and (iii) any required modifications
to the CUM iumn Station force main. The costs for such
work are estimated by the District at $200,000,
however, the Company agrees to pay the actual charges
therefor.
Company and District agree to work cooperatively with
the City and IRwD in order to cause the implementation of the
sewer servicing plan for the Newport Coast Project in a manner
consistent with this Memorandum of Understanding.
The Irvine Company, a Michigan corporation
By:
Title:
By:
Title:
Sanitation District No. 5 of orange County, California
By:
Title:
By.
Title:
2242S2;5/16/90
3
"Z-3" AGENDA ITEM k9(v) - DISTRICT 5 "Z-3"
RESOLUTION NO. 90-65-7
AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS AND
FILING OF APPLICATION TO LAFCO RE ANNEXATION
OF TERRITORY T OISTRI T N 7 ANNEXATIO
V�. 1'3 - W LLIAMS ANNEXATI N
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS AND REQUESTING
THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS
FOR ANNEXATION TO THE DISTRICT OF TERRITORY KNOWN AS
ANNEXATION NO. 135 - WILLIAMS ANNEXATION TO COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That proceedings are hereby authorized to be initiated by
District No. 7, and the Local Agency Formation Commission of Orange County is
hereby requested to take proceedings for the annexation of territory designated
as "Annexation No. 135 - Williams Annexation to County Sanitation District
No. 7", the boundaries of which are more particularly described and delineated
on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this
resolution, according to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth in this
resolution in the manner provided by the Cortese-Knox Local Government
Reorganization Act of 1985; and,
Section 2. That this proposal is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local
Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Division 3, commencing with Section 56000
of the California Government Code; and,
Section 3. That this application is for the purpose of annexing
approximately 2.50 acres of territory to District No. 7 in the vicinity of the
southeast corner of the intersection of Lemon Heights Drive and Lower Lake Drive
"AA-I" AGENDA ITEM #9(x) - DISTRICT 7 "AA-I"
in unincorporated County territory, to provide sanitary sewer service to said
territory, which said service is not now provided by any public agency, as
requested by Donald R. Williams and Sharon V. Williams, owners of said property;
and,
Section 4. That the territory to be annexed is uninhabited; and,
Section S. That this proposal is consistent with the adopted sphere of
Influence of the affected District; and,
Section 6. That proposed Annexation No. 135 - Williams Annexation to
County Sanitation District No. 7 shall be subject to the condition that all fees
required to be paid to the District must be satisfied prior to completion of the
annexation proceedings; and,
Section 7. That the District hereby agrees, pursuant to Section 99.1 of
the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its ad valorem property tax allocation
exchange with other affected taxing agencies.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 13, 1990.
"AA-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(x) - DISTRICT 7 "AA-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 90-56
`../ APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO AGREEMENT WITH SAIC
FOR OCEAN MONITORING CONTRACT SERVICES FOR CSDOC
120-IN H OCEAN OUTFAL . SPECIFICATION NS-032
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO AGREEMENT WITH SCIENCE
APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION (SAIL) FOR
OCEAN MONITORING CONTRACT SERVICES FOR COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 120-INCH
OCEAN OUTFALL, SPECIFICATION NO. 5-032, EXTENDING
CONTRACT FROM JULY 1, 1990 TO JUNE 30, 1991
WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) for Ocean Monitoring
Contract Services for County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 120-Inch
Ocean Outfall , Specification No. 5-032; and,
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 1 provided for the acquisition of additional
laboratory instrumentation and authorized additional laboratory work to perform
analyses on ocean sediments for trace constituents to comply with additional
requirements imposed by the Environmental Protection Agency; and,
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 2 provided for modifications to the Current
Monitoring Program required by EPA; and,
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 3 extended the contract from July 1, 1986, to
June 30, 1987; and,
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 4 extended the contract from July 1, 1987 to
June 30, 1988; and,
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 5 extended the contract from July 1, 1988 to
June 30, 1989 and provided for program modifications for the contract period
from July 1, 1987 through June 30, 1988 as well as the fourth year of said
contract, July 1, 1988 through June 30, 1989; and provided for a reduction in
"BB-1" AGENDA ITEM #13(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "BB-1"
fees to be negotiated for years one, two and three of said contract; and,
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 6 extended the contract from July 1, 1989 to
June 30, 1990; and,
WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend the agreement to
extend the existing contract from July 1, 1990 to June 30, 1991; and,
WHEREAS, in accordance with the established procedures for selection of
professional engineering and architectural services, the Selection Committee has
negotiated and certified a fee for said services.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Amendment No. 7 dated July 1, 1990, to that certain
agreement dated August 7, 1985, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1,
acting for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11. 13 and 14, for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for County Sanitation
Districts of Orange County 120-Inch Ocean Outfali , Specification No. S-032,
providing for extension of the existing contract from July 1, 1990 through
June 30, 1991 (Contract Period Six), is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be Increased by
$1,821,365.00 for the sixth year of said contract, increasing the total
authorized compensation from $7,839,093.00 to $9,660,458.00; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for
Itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said Amendment No. 7 in form approved by the
General Counsel .
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 13, 1990.
"BB-2" AGENDA ITEM #13(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "BB-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 90-58
`J APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS T COND T A
FOUL AIR TREATMENT OPTIMI TI N S DY
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS TO
CONDUCT A FOUL AIR TREATMENT OPTIMIZATION
STUDY
WHEREAS, the Districts have completed the installation of foul air
collection and deodorizing facilities at both treatment plants; and,
WHEREAS, said facilities were built and operate under separate permits
with numerous conditions issued by the South Coast Air Quality Management
District (SCAQMD); and,
WHEREAS, it is deemed desirable to conduct a study to make recommendations
to clarify certain ambiguous provisions of said SCAQMD permits relative to
_ operation and discharge conditions, and to enhance the odor control system to
operate more effectively and efficiently; and,
WHEREAS, the Executive Committee .has recommended that John Carollo
Engineers be engaged to conduct the study inasmuch as they have previously
worked an many of the odor control systems and are available to begin work
immediately on the necessary study.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the proposed Professional Services Agreement dated
, by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County and John Carollo Engineers, providing for
"CC-1" AGENDA ITEM #15(b)(6) - ALL DISTRICTS "CC-1"
services to conduct a foul air treatment optimization study, is hereby approved
and accepted; and, �..�
Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in
accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows:
Professional Services, at hourly
rates for labor plus overhead
at 155%, not to exceed $ 65.000.00
Direct Expenses, not to exceed 3,000.00
Subconsultant Fees 10,000.00
Fixed Profit 7,000.00
TOTAL, not to exceed $ 85,000.00
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for
itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the
General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 13, 1990.
"CC-2" AGENDA ITEM H15(b)(6) - ALL DISTRICTS "CC-2"
SONNENSCHEIN NATH 8 ROSENTHAL
211 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD
\� CHICAGO SUITE 21M (213)820-2000
NEW YORK LOS ANOELES, CALIFORNIA 900,7 FACSIMILE
SAN FRANCISCO (213)9212924
sr LOUIS June 6, 1990
.ASHINGTON.Mo. DIRECT LIVE
(213) 623-0057
Mr. Wayne Sylvester
General Manager
Orange County Sanitation Districts
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127
Dear Wayne:
At your request, we are proposing to represent the Orange .
County Sanitation Districts as special counsel for personnel and
labor relations matters. our representation would be limited to
the following subjects:
1. Advice and representation in meet and conferral matters
with employee organizations.
2. Advice regarding legal matters arising in regard to
employee organizations representing or attempting to represent OCSD
employees.
3. Advice and representation regarding matters dealing with
employment, retention and termination of employees including equal
employment opportunity, wrongful termination, grievances and
arbitrations.
As always, we would continue to work with and consult the
Districts general counsel, Rourke 6 Woodruff.
1. Fees, We will bill you on an hourly rate basis at
the rate of one hundred fifty dollars per hour.
2. costs, often it is necessary for us to incur
expenses for items such as copying, travel, lodging, meals,
telephone calls, and transcripts. When we incur these expenses, we
list them separately as disbursements_
3. Billings, Our statements are prepared and mailed
monthly. We ask our clients to approve and pay these bills upon
presentation. In the event our clients do not pay bills on
presentation, we charge 18 interest per month beginning with the
sixtieth day after presentation. In the event of a dispute
"DD-1" AGENDA ITEM #17 - ALL DISTRICTS "DD-1"
SONNENSCHEIN NATH 6 ROSENTHAL
Mr. Wayne Sylvester ,
June 5, 1990
Page Two �✓
regarding the amount, you and the firm agree that the prevailing
party is entitled to attorney's fees in any dispute resolution
proceeding.
4. Right of Termination. You have the right to
terminate our representation at any time. We have the same right
subject to an obligation to give you reasonable notice to arrange
other counsel. It is anticipated that this contract will be
reviewed annually by both parties.
If after you have reviewed this letter you have any
questions or if at any time in our representation of you there are
questions about our services, we would appreciate it if you would
raise them immediately.
Please initial one copy of this letter and return it to
US.
1 yours,
E ATERSON
LTP:jw
WAYNE SYLVESTER
GENERAL MANAGER
"DD-2" AGENDA ITEM #17 - ALL DISTRICTS "DD-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
June 5, 1990 a1 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
1=44 ELLi9 AVENUE
10,Box 912]
` ' IOYMNN V4IEY,C.UNDnNA 921204127
AEI 9141962-2411
Staff Report
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 3 and 11
Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvelrents
Contract No. 11-17
Project Report for Slater PL= Station Improvements
At the regular May board meeting, the Directors received and discussed a project
report on needed improvements to the Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System.
The first phase inptvvem ms include the construction of the new, master-planned
pump station and inlet pipe and discharge facilities, at an estimated cost of
appro: ;mately $7.6 million dollars. (Additional facilities serving only
District 11 will be separately designed and constructed in the future in
accordance with the Master Plan.)
In June 1989 the District 11 Board engaged John Camllo Engineers to prepare the
project report relative to Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System
Improvements. Subsequent to that, the Joint Boards of Directors adopted the new
30-year master plan which identifies the improvements as a joint project of
Districts 3 and 11. The new nester plan will realize considerable savings to
both Districts over the previous master plan which provided for sewaring the
tributary areas through the Coast Trunk Sewer.
Last month the Boards of Districts 3 and 11 approved the project report for the
Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17,
prepared by John Carollo Engineers, and also approved an agreement between the
Districts providing for finaOcing, design, construction, capacity ownership
(based on flows) and operation of certain master-planned sewage collection
facilities serving Districts 3 and 11, including the Slater Avenue Pump Station
system.
Boise. Chios Service Capacity
Included within the drainage area originally anticipated to be served by the
Slater Avenue Pump Station is 1,608 acres of land south of Iva Patos Avenue and
southeasterly of Warner Avenue, generally known as the Bolas Chita.
In April 1987 the Directors of District 11 authorized staff and General Counsel
to negoddate an annexation agreement with the property owners. The Signal Bolsa
corporation is the principal landowner and the Board's action was nxursuaIlt to
Signal Bolsa's request. The Bolsa Chita area is presently outside the boundary
of District 11 but within its sphere of influence. Signal Bolsa principals and
counsel and Districts' staff and counsel have met numerous times over tie past
several years in an attempt to came to a preannenmtion agreement. The last
draft of the proposed agreement provided for the anneGation of the Bolsa Chita
`..� area and prepayment of fees for those areas to be developed by Signal Bolsa to
"EE-1" AGENDA ITEM #34(b) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "EE-1"
provide the necessary funding for constriction of capacity in the Slater Avenue
Pump Station system to serve the Bolas Chica if and when it is annexed.
However, Signal Bolsa Corporation is not yet ready to annex and recently advised
staff that they are no longer willing to proceed with the proposed preanneration —..
agreement.
If capacity for the Bolas Chita is not included in the Slater Amp Station
system, Signal Boles would have to construct sewer lines through the Bolas Chica
area and tie into the Districts' Coast Trunk Sewer at a cost that would be
substantially higher than putting up the money now for capacity in the Slater
Pump Station system. Eluding and construction of such facilities to connect to
the Districts' Coast Trunk Sewer wild have to be provided by the property
owners/developers.
Secause of the urgent need to proceed with design and construction of the
facilities, staff has previously notified Signal Bolsa Corporation that they
mist make a decision by May 16, 1990 on the prevmexation agreement, and that
without such an agreement the Districts could provide no assurance that the area
could be annexed or provided sewerage service by the Districts in the future.
Attached for the Directors' information is a Signal letter dated April 25, 1990
and two District letters dated May 2 and May 23, 1990. Signal has not responded
to our letters.
At the May Board meeting it was the consensus of the Directors that unless a
preannexation agree,mnt is executed by the Bolas Chita property owners,
capacity to serve the area should not be included in the Districts' sewage
system.
The existing facilities are at capacity, thus it is now necessary to proceed
with design and construction of the Slater Avenue Pimp Station system. The
Districts cannot delay the project any longer waiting for Signal Bolsa
Corporation to make up its mind on the issue of annexation.
Authorization for Final Design and Construction Services for Slater Avenue Frog
Station Sewage System improvements
The agreement executed last year between District 11 and Carollo for the
aforementioned project report on Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System
Improvements also provides for final design and construction services, to be
negotiated upon completion of the project report which was approved by the
Boards last month.
Accordingly, the recommended action is to authorize the Selection Committee
(ChaiMMent of both Districts 3 and 11) to negotiate an addendum to the contract
with John Carollo Engineers for final design and construction services for the
Slater Avenue Amp Station Sewage System Improvements. Following the Selection
C®nittes's nw.0tiations, the proposed addeuxhmm will be presented to the Boards
for consideration.
A final decision on the capacity of the Slater Amp Station System will
be made at the time the design is authorizcd by the Boards.
-2_ �../
"EE-2" AGENDA ITEM #34(b) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "EE-2"
SIGNAL LANDMARK
Joe J.Slarkn
Senior V=-Pmsiaent
Lano De tvMem
April 25, 1990
Mr.Thomas M.Dawes
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
P.O.Box 8127
Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
RE: Bolo Chid Annexation
Dear Tom:
I appreciated the chance to meet with you and Clark Ide last week concerning our Bolsa Chien project. As
I indicated in the meeting, our desire to amen to District No. 11 Sanitation District has not changed
What we are facing is the delay in our processing schedule that will push our needs for sewer capacity out
to 1995. In light of that, we are asking the District to work with us on an annexation agreement that
reflects our current schedule.
We are prepared to move ahead with an agreement with the Sanitation District,assuming we can work out
some of the concerns that we have with the current language. In terms of dollar commitments, we are
prepared to move ahead based on paying our proportional share of the projected design fees at this time.
My understanding from our meeting last week was that the design effort was to cost a total of S600,000,
with our capacity being 10% of the tonal design capacity of the system. We would therefore be will* to
pay$W,000 at this time,with the balance due at the time we annex to the City of Huntington Beach. We
feel that this would show good faith on our part in participating in the design efforts, while assuring you
that as soon as the project is approved we will pay the balance of our annexation fees and move toward the
development of our project and the eventual payment of our hook-up fees.
If you find the above proposal acceptable please contact Lucy Dunn at our office and we will immediately
begin working out the necessary modifications to the agreement in order to meet your deadline for the
June Sanitation Board meeting.
Yours truly,
SIGNAL LANDMARK
Joe J.�Smclier %
Sr.LVice pYesident
JJS:jm
a: Lucetta Dunn
Carl Neuhauscn
17890Skyaark Ciroe lmne.CA 927M 74-261-0360 FAX7M-M-1902
"EE-3" AGENDA ITEM #34(b) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "EE-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 9127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 9272"127
10944 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92708.7018 4. 1
(714)962.2411
FAX(n4)952-0356
May 2, 1990
Mr. Joe J. Stucker,
Senior Vice President,
. Iand Development
Signal Landmark
17890 Skypark Circle
Irvine, CA 92714
Dear Mr. Stucker:
Subiect: Preannexation Avreement. for Bolsa Chita
This letter is a follow up to our m9eting two weeks ago regarding the annexation
of Bolsa Chita to County Sanitation District No. 11 (CSD 11), and a response to
your April 25, 1990 letter.
For some four or five years your company and CSD 11 have been discussing the
development of Bolsa Chic, and your desire to annex Bolsa Chita to CSD 11 in
order to receive sewer service. Those discussions have resulted in several
drafts of a preannexation agreement. The final version was concluded last
month for signature and was intender) to be presented to our Board of Directors
this month. The pxeatmelmtion agreement was based On our understanding of
Signal's commitment in our many meetings. It assured your company that
annexation would be allaw d and provided for payment of fees to CSD 11 under a
time schedule contained within the agreement necessary to provide needed funds
for capacity in the Districts' sewerage system to serve the Bolsa Chita. As
presently envisioned and in accordance with the 1989 Master Plan adopted in July
1989, sewage generated by the proposed annexation and development of Bolsa Chica
would be directed to Cm Lines in Warner Avenue, Springdale Avenue, Slater
Avenue, and to a new Slater Avenue Puup Station located between Golden West
Street and Gothard Street on the south side of Slater Avenue.
you have recently indicated that you do not intend to proceed with execution of
the preannexation agreement at this time, primarily because of the fee schedule
contained therein. In lieu of the fee schedule, which provided for payment of
all annexation fees within one year (about $1.8 - $2,0 million, depending on the
actual size of the area to be annexed), you are proposing to pay the nominal
amount of $60,000 for engineering w•uk.
Based on Signal's early cmmttnents to execute an agreement and pay the
necessary funds to provide city in its sewerage system for the Bolsa Chita,
CSD 11, in good faith, has delayed proccscing with needed master plan facilities
design and constriction and alternative financing. CSD 11 can no longer hold
"EE-4" AGENDA ITEM #34(b) - DISTRICTS 3 a 11 "EE-4"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTHIOTs
of ORANGE COUN Y. CAUFORNIA
low E s'l,,ME
Oo.eox 6127
\_W/ lMWM VG ..G K MG 92Y2s812]
Joe J. Stucker ma�ssz¢an
May 1, 1990
Page Mm
its program in abeyance while Signal cantimies to vacillate on this matter.
The District must proceed immediately with the construction of the urgently
needed facilities and we mist advise you that unless the pream>e>oation agreement
as last stutmitted by the District is executed by May 16, 1990, the District has
no alternative but to proceed without provisions to serve the Bolsa Chic- area.
As you know from cur previous discussions, the District simply cannot includ
Capacity in its facilities for the Bolsa China, which is not now in the
District, unless the funding for such capacity is put up by Signal . If the
agreement is signed we can include capacity in the proposed sewage collection
improvements for the eventual develcgaent of Boles Ch:.ca.
In the event you elect not to sign the preannexitiom agreement and wish to
develop the area at a later date, there would be only one way to obtain sewer
service for the Bolsa Arica as discussed with you at cur last ,meting. That
would be the rcnvtructirn of conveyance facilities which world deliver
wastewExter to the Sanitation nist, cts' Coast 'Runk Sews which terminates at
Orange Avenue and Golden West Street. r,nstr ucti an of these facilities would
best he made within the rarfield Connector to the Bolsa China easterly bluff
where a pump station would need to be constructed and then to Orange Avenue and
Go1dan West Street. We must reiterate that the are not master-planned
facilities and, therefore, you are hereby advised that CSD 11 will not finance,
design, ccnsttvct or maintain any of these facilities.
Finally, as you knew, under either alternative, your cmpany would have to pay
identazal annexation and connection charges as established by the Boards of
Directors.
If you have any questions I'm available to met with you at any time.
Wl
yore lZE
Th®s M. Dawes
Director of t]lginee nng
TMD:jt
cc: General. Ccunnsel
Richard Bernard
Assistant City Administrator
City of &a:tdngton Beach
"EE-5" AGENDA ITEM #34(b) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "EE-5"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
/ \ ° OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 9272"127
108"ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-1018
(714)98 2411
FAX(714)982-0358
May 23, 1990
Mr. Joe J. Stucker
Senior Vice President
Land Development
Signal Landmark
17890 Skypark Circle
Irvine, CA 92714
Dear Mr. Stucker:
Subject: Preannexation Agreement for Development of
Signal Bolsa Chios Property
By letter dated May 2, 1990, you were informed that County
Sanitation District No. 11 (CSD 11) required execution of the
preannexation agreement prior to May 16, or the Slater Avenue
Sewer System Improvements would be designed and constructed
without provision for the development of your Bolsa Chica
property. As we have previously explained to you, CSD 11 can
no longer wait to proceed with the design work or the
necessary sewage system improvements. You have not responded
to our letter.
Accordingly, the purpose of this letter is to reiterate, so
that there is no misunderstanding, your development will not
receive sewer service from the existing or planned Slater
Avenue Sewage System Improvements including the Slater Avenue
Pump Station.
Furthermore, •you should be aware that there is no guarantee of
sewer service in the future. As you know, the District's
ability to construct sewage collection, treatment and disposal
facilities is dependent upon the receipt of permits from
regulatory agencies. In the event *hat those approvals are
not timely, CSD 11 may not allow annexation. Capacity will be
allocated first I-n those who have previously annexed.
"EE-6" AGENDA ITEM #34(b) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "EE-6"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
W ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFONNIA
Mr. Joe J. Stucker
May 23, 1990 'a6Y"S VENUE
Page Two na.m.812s
`r/ NwxraN va .0 IMANMS Meain
nuuacz4ui
Assuming CSD 11 can allow sewer service in the future, sewage
facilities would have to be constructed to deliver the water
to the Coast Trunk Sewer at Golden West Street and Orange
Avenue. CSD 11 will not design, construct, maintain or pay
for any of these facilities.
Z
rul urs,Z M. Dawes
Director of Engineering
TMD:jt
CERTIFIED MAIL
cc: General Counsel
Richard Bernard
Assistant City Administrator
City of Huntington Beach
Directors, CSD 11
General Manager
"EE-7" AGENDA ITEM #34(b) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "EE-7"
.� COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 11 29 3 ,59 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
ON
MAY 9, 1990
PNITAT9G^,O
i aav°limn Oo S
U
G 'r/ees 195 .I
RgNGE C&
a
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1.
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and la of Orange County, California, was held an May 9, 1990, at
7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Fall wing the Pledge of Allegiance
and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for
Districts Nos. I, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11. 13 and le as follows:
ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO. 1: x James A. Weimer, Chairman Orma Crank
-7--Charles E. Puckett, Chairman pro tem —_0.lchard B. Edgar
=Dan Griset Dan Young
=Roger Stanton —Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 2: x Iry Pickier, Chat rman Fred Hunter
x James Neal, Chat roan pro tem —George Scott
=Roland E. Bigonger —_Henry W. Nodes
=A.B. -Buck' Catlin _Chris Marty
=Dan Griset _Dan Young
xWilliam 0. Mahoney _Beth Graham
=Robert H. Main Norman Culver
=Carrey Nelson —Mayne Wadin
=Arthur G. Newton Norman Z. Eckenrode_
a Wayne Silzel Harold Saldarini
=Don E. Smith —Fred Barrera
=Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 3: x Richard Polls, Chat roan Eva G. Miner
=J.R. -Bob- Siefen, Chairman pro tan —Dewey Wiles
a Margaret M. Arnold —Cecilia L. Age
x Wes Bannister —Peter Green
_
=A.B. -Buck- Catlin _Chris Worthy
x Norman Culver _Robert H. Main
=Beth Graham William 0. Mahoney
=Don R. Griffin —Gonna L. Chessen
7--Dan Griset —Dan Young
=James Neal —George Scott
=Carrey Nelson _Wayne Wedin
=Iry Pickier Fred Hunter
=Roger Stanton —_Don R. Roth
=Charles Sylvia Robert wahlstrw
=Paul Verellen —Edward L. Allen
=Edna Nilson —Victor Orgies
DISTRICT NO. 5: x Evelyn Hart. Chairman Ruthelyn Plummer
=Phil Sansone, Chat rman pro tem John C. Cox, Jr.
_Don R. Roth =Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 6: x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chat rman _Evelyn Hart
=James Wenner, Chairman pro tem James M. Ferryman
_Don R. Roth x Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 7: x Don E. Smith, Chat roan Fred Barrera
x Richard Edgar, Chat roan pro tem —Charles E. Puckett
�. =John C. Cox, Jr. —Ruthelyn Plummer
=Dan Griset Dan Young
Don R. Roth =_Roger Stanton
=Sally Anne Sheridan tarry Agran
x James Wahner _yarry Green
DISTRICT NO. 11: x Grace Winchell, Chairman Peter Green
—Tom Mays, Chairman pro tem =Jim Silva
z Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 13: x Henry W. Mocha, Chat rnan _Roland E. Bigonger
=Wayne Wedin. Chairman pro tan Carrey Nelson
= _
_Iry Pickier Fred Hunter
Don R. Roth x Roger Stanton
=Dan E. Smith Fred Barrera
DISTRICT NO. IJ: Peer A. Swan, Chairman x Darryl Miller
=Sally Anne Sheridan. Chairman pro tn:. --Larry Agran
_Leslie A. Pontious _Richard B. Edgar
"Res" Don R. Roth x Roger Stanton
=Don E. Smith —Fred Barrera
-2-
05/09/90
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager,
Rita J. Brown, Board Secretary, Thomas
M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Corinne
Clawson, Mark Esquer, Penny Kyle, John
Linder, Rory Nelson, Bob Ooten, Jack
Vincent, Rich von Langen, Chuck Winsor
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel ,
Jamel Demir, Conrad Hohener, Walt
Howard, Bill Knopf, Phil Stone, Jiimney
Knight, David Wade, Ramiro Salazar,
Jose A. Salazar, Don Willet, Victor
M. Salazar, Ray Byerley, Tom
Richardson, Steve Dworkin
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 7 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file minute excer is
from the arden rove Sanitary That the minute excerpts from the
District and the City of Tustin re Garden Grove Sanitary District and the
Board appointments City of Tustin re appointment of
alternate Directors and seating new
members of the Boards, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed, as
follows: (*Mayor)
Agency District Active Director Alternate Director
Garden Grove 2 Robert H. Main Norman E. Culver
Sanitary Dist.
City of Tustin 1 Charles E. Puckett Richard B. Edgar*
7 Richard B. Edgar* Charles E. Puckett
14 Leslie A. Pontious Richard B. Edgar*
DISTRICT 1 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual election of Chairman and 'elections are to be held for Chairman
Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the
Boards of Directors, the Secretary ,
declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro
tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1.
It was then moved: That Director James A. Wahner be nominated as a
candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the
vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director
Wahner as Chairman.
It was further moved: That Director Charles E. Puckett be nominated as a
candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other
nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot
for Director Puckett as Chairman pro tem.
-3-
05/09/90
DISTRICT 2 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual election of Chairman and— elections are to be held for Chairman
hairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tam of each of the
Boards of Directors, the Secretary
declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro
tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2.
It was then moved: That Director Iry Pickier be nominated as a candidate
for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was
polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Pickler as
Chairman.
It was further moved: That Directors Roland Bigonger and James Neal be
nominated as candidates for the office of Chairman pro tem. The vote was
then polled by a show of hands, following which the Secretary announced that
Director Neal had been elected Chairman pro tem.
DISTRICT 3 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual election of Chairman and— elections are to be held for Chairman
Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the
Boards of Directors, the Secretary
declared nominations in order for the offices of.Chairman and Chairman pro
tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3.
It was then moved: That Director Richard T. Polls be nominated as a
candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the
vote was palled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director
Polls as Chairman.
It was further moved: That Director J. R. "Bob" Siefen be nominated as a
candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other
nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot
for Director Siefen as Chairman pro tem.
DISTRICT 5 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman
Chairman pro tern of e Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the
Boards of Directors, the Secretary
declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro
' tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. S.
It was then moved: That Director Evelyn Hart be nominated as a candidate
for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was
polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Hart as
Chairman.
It was further moved: That Director Phil Sansone be nominated as a
candidate fog the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other
nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot
for Director Sansone as Chairman pro tem.
-4-
05/09/90
DISTRICT 6 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual election of Chal man 'and elections are to be held for Chairman
Cha rman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the
Boards of Directors, the Secretary
declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro
tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6.
It was then moved: That Director Ruthelyn Plummer be nominated as a
candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the
vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director
Plummer as Chairman.
It was further moved: That Director James A. Wahner be nominated as a
candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other
nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot
for Director Wahner as Chairman pro tem.
DISTRICT 7 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual election of Chairman-and elections are to be held for Chairman
Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the
Boards of Directors, the Secretary -
declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro
tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7.
It was then moved: That Director Don E. Smith be nominated as a candidate
for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was
polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Smith as
Chairman.
It was further moved: That Director Sally Anne Sheridan be nominated for
the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote
was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Sheridan
as Chairman pro tem.
After a caucus by the Board, Director Sheridan withdrew from the post of
Chairman pro tem, following which Director Richard B. Edgar was duly
nominated and elected Chairman pro tem.
DISTRICT 11 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual election of ChairmaT and elections are to be held for Chairman
Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the
Boards of Directors, the Secretary
declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro -
tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11.
It was then moved: That Director Grace Winchell be nominated as a candidate
for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was
pilled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Winchell as
Chairman.
it was further moved: That Director Tam Mays be nominated as a candidate
for the office of Chairman prc tem. There being no other nominations, the
vote was palled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director
May: Chairman pro tem.
-5-
�..
05/09/90
DISTRICT 13 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman
hairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the
Boards of Directors, the Secretary
declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro
tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13.
It was then moved: That Director Henry W. Wedaa be nominated as a candidate
for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was
polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Wedaa as
Chairman.
It was further moved: That Director Wayne Wedin be nominated as a candidate
for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the
vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director
Wedin as Chairman pro tem.
DISTRICT 14 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman
5—airman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the
Boards of Directors, the Secretary
declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro
tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14..
It was then moved: That Director Peer A. Swan be nominated as a candidate
for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was
polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Swan as
Chairman.
It was further moved: That Director Sally Anne Sheridan be nominated as a
candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other
nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot
for Director Sheridan as Chairman pro tem.
ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Catlin reported that
Adoption of Resolutions of Directors Ursula Kennedy and Bob Perry
Appreciation for retiring hectors had announced their retirement from the
Boards of Directors. Ursula Kennedy,
serving on the District 14 Board, has represented the City of Tustin for
approximately four years. Bob Perry has represented the Garden Grove
Sanitary District for the last 16 years on the District No. 2 Board.
The Joint Chairman then introduced resolutions expressing the Boards'
appreciation to these retiring Directors.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt the following resolutions
expressing their appreciation to the retiring Directors and recognizing
their outstanding contributions and dedication to public service:
Resolution No. Director City/Agency District
90-39 Ursula Kennedy Tustin 14
90-40 Bob Perry Garden Grove Sanitary Dist. 2
../
Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these
minutes.
-6-
05/09/90
ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Catlin reported that at
Peco n t on of industrial its annual conference in April , the
ischar ers--Omni Metal Finisning, California Water Pollution Control
xson Meta ,n,shin and naheim Association had presented awards of
Citrus roducts-- or receivin excellence and certificates to three /
awards of excellence Orange County industrial firms. The
purpose of the awards is to stimulate
interest on the part of industry to take positive steps to meet strict water
pollution control standards. These firms, nominated by the Districts'
Industrial Waste Division inspectors, were recognized for their efforts over
the past year to comply with Districts' discharge requirements and foster an
awareness in the business community for the need to control industrial
wastewater to help protect public health and the environment.
The Joint Chairman then recognized Mr. Victor Salazar of Omni Metal
Finishing as well as several other employees from the firm, recipient of a
CWPCA Certificate of Merit; Mr. Jimmy Knight of Hixson Metal Finishing,
recipient of a CWPCA Certificate of Merit; and Mr. David Wade, Plant Manager
of Anaheim Citrus Products, recipient of CWPCA's Large Plant-of-the-Year
award. Chairman Catlin presented each of the industry representatives the
awards recognizing their exemplary performance.
On behalf of the Boards of Directors, Chairman Catlin commended the firms
and expressed the Boards' appreciation for their efforts.
ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Catlin reported that
Report of the Joint Chairman the Districts' General Manager, Wayne
Sylvester, was recently elected Vice
President of the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) at
their annual meeting in Houston. AMSA is very active in legislative,
regulatory and technical issues at the national level with offices in
Washington, D.C.
The Joint Chairman then noted that because of recent turnover in Board
membership, there have been vacancies created on some of the Boards'
Committees. Chairman Catlin announced the following appointments to various
Committees:
Director Committee Post
Henry Wades Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee Chairman
Wayne Wedin Fiscal Policy Committee Member
Robert Main Special Reorganization Committee Representative, District 2
Phil Sansone Special Reorganization Committee Representative, District 5
Joint Chairman Catlin then reported that the Fiscal Policy Committee was
scheduled to meet on Wednesday, May 16th, at 5:30 p.m.
He also called a Joint meeting of the Executive Committee and the Fiscal
Policy Committee for Wednesday, May 23rd, at 5:30 p.m..
Mr. Catlin further reported that a special Joint Works Selection Committee
meeting had been scheduled for Wednesday, May 23rd, immediately following
the Joint Executive Committee/Fiscal Policy Committee meeting.
The .Joint Chairman also advised that the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse ^
Committee was scheduled to meet on Thursday, May 31st, at 5:30 p.m.
-7-
05/09/90
ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel briefly reported
Report of the General Counsel on the settlement of a claim filed
several years ago by Cravens, Dargen a
Company as a result of a sewer backup in District 7.
He also reported on the status of pending litigation relative to Universal
Circuits, Inc. (UCI) concerning the Districts' decision not to renew the
industrial waste discharge permit for their facility on Newport Circle in
Santa Ana. Mr. Woodruff advised that he had just received a proposal from
Universal Circuit's attorney relative to resolution of the lawsuits filed by
UCI and the Districts relative to the Newport Circle plant, as well as UCI's
application for an industrial waste permit for their new facility currently
being constructed on South Yale in Santa Ana which the Districts had
recently denied. He noted that he had not yet had an opportunity to
evaluate the proposal but would report further on the matter at the
Executive Committee meeting scheduled for May 23rd.
DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held April 11, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held April 11, 1990,
nor the adjourned regular meeting held April 18, 1990, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held April 11, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held April 11, 1990,
nor the adjourned regular meeting held April 5, 1990, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held April 11, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or
Approval of M mutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held April 11, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT it There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held April 11, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or
Approva of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
�✓ regular meeting held April 11, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
-8-
05/09/90
DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held April 11, 1990,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratification of payment of Joint
and Individual District Uaimi That payment of Joint and individual
District claims set forth on pages
"A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized
below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts
so indicated.
4/11/90 4/25/90
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint operating Fund - $ 564,949.79 $ 946,387.45
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund 2,044,463.55 354,973.08
Joint Working Capital Fund - 212,846.74 186,375.58
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 13,922.72 11,743.17
DISTRICT NO. 1 - 338.00 135.72
DISTRICT - 8,090.58 12,771.73
DI TRRDUT NO. 3 - 18,459.41 3,384.51
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 5,808.77 7,539.74
DISTRICT NO. - 230.71 9,197.99
DI TRI T N . 7 - 16,126.40 82,380.68
DISTRICT - 4,319.12 6,749.59
OI TRI T N . 13 - 38.00 -0-
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 5,406.93 28,456.16
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 24,599.59 3,058.81
DISTRICTS N & 7 J INT - 2,274.67 11,519.63
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 2 035.92 3,690.44
,92 ,_;1_6 70 T1, 68794.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awarding Video ns ection Services
for Districts' ewers and Manholes That the bid tabulation and
Specification No. -045, to PSS, Inc. recommendation re award of purchase
order contract for Video Inspection
Services for Districts' Sewers and Manholes, Specification No. S-045, be,
and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase order contract be, and is hereby, awarded
to PSS, Inc. , in an amount not to exceed $164,786.00 for a two-year period
beginning May 15, 1990.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving hange Order No. 2 to the
plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 2 to the plans
ob�o.P1-33 and specifications for Primary
Clariflers Nos. 6-15 and Related
Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33, authorizing an
addition of $21,371.00 to the contract with Gust K. Newberg Construction Co.
for three items of additional work, be, anu i hereby, approved.
-9-
05/09/90
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
rov n an a Order No. 3 to the
0�ans and speclficationS for That change Order No. 3 to the plans
33- and specifications for Rehabilitation
`./ of Digesters 7 and 8 at Reclamation
Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-1, authorizing an addition of $92,392.00 to the
contract with S. A. Healy Co. 8 Assoc. for seven items of additional work,
and granting a time extension of 60 calendar days for completion of said
additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving d endum No. 2 to the
rofess ona ervices reement That the Selection Committee
w o e n neer n or orat on certification of the final negotiated
or design of Job No. -17 fee relative to Addendum No. 2 to the
Professional Services Agreement with
Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of Central Laboratory, Job
No. J-17, providing for wage escalations and construction
` management/inspection services, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed
and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution
No. 90-41, approving said Addendum No. 2 to the Agreement with Boyle
Engineering Corporation, for additional services on an hourlyy-rate basis for
labor plus overhead, for an additional amount not to exceed $6,438.00 for
wage escalations due to delays in the project, plus construction management/
Inspection services at the rate of $80.00 per hour, including overhead and
profit, for a total amount not to exceed $156,160.00, increasing the total
authorized compensation from $329,105.00 to an amount not to exceed
$491,703.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of
these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
A rovin Addendum o. b e
ro ess 0nal ervices A reement That the Boards of Directors hereby
with K. P. Lindstrom nc. for adopt Resolution No. 90-42, approving
technical and environmental support Addendum No. 1 to the Professional
services re 1 ollection services Agreement with K. P. Lindstrom,
Treatment and u1sposa aciiities Inc. for technical and environmental
Master Plan FIR and Ucean Discharge support services relative to the 1989
emn t renewal app ca on Collection, Treatment and Disposal
Facilities Master Plan Environmental
Impact Report and Ocean Discharge Permit renewal application, providing for
a reallocation of the costs among categories within said agreement, with no
change in the maximum authorized compensation of $304,000.00. Said
resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Aut or n the GeneralManager to
Ts
sue azi urc ase order to Southern That the General Manager be, and is
a ornia son am an re hereby, authorized to issue a purchase
installation o a e un er roun order to Southern California Edison
facilities to provide for a Company in the amount of $69,499.00
4,U 0 kw, standbyelectrical power and execute necessary documents, in
service for .ant No. 1 form approved by the General Counsel ,
for Installation of added underground
facilities to provide for a 4,000 kw, standby electrical power service for
Plant No. 1.
-10-
05/09/90
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizin staff to ssue a
urchase order to olar urb;nes That staff be, and is hereby,
Inc. pec fication No. R- authorized to issue a purchase order
to Solar Turbines, Inc. in an amount
not to exceed $45,000.00 plus sales tax for Repairs to Solar Energy
Generator No. 3 at Plant No. 1 (Specification No. R-036).
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Amending Boards' action of Apr'1 11,
1990 revokin au 55F zatit� That the Boards' action of April 11,
Issue a urchase order to M chael 1990, be, and is hereby, amended,
hevrolet and ,
or z ng staff to revoking authorization for staff to
Issue a urchase order to Folsom Lake issue a purchase order to Michael
Ford pecification No. -35 - Chevrolet in the amount of $86,535.00
plus tax for the purchase of nine
Chevrolet S10 pick-up trucks (Specification No. A-150-2); and authorizing
staff to issue a purchase order to Folsom Lake Ford in the amount of
$84,331.89 plus tax and delivery charges for purchase of nine Ford Ranger
pick-up trucks (Specification No. A-150-2) , in accordance with the terms and
conditions of the Cooperative Procurement Program of the State of California
and State of California Contract No. 1-90-23-20.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Den in Application for Permission
to resent Lae aim of Lynn Redman That the Application for Permission to
Present Late Claim for personal
injuries filed by Leatrice L. Cohen, attorney for claimant Lynn Redman, be,
and is hereby, denied.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive file and a rove written
report of the Executive omni ttee That the written report of the
Executive Committee's meeting on
April 25, 1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Establishing policies and procedures
for selection and procurement of That the Boards of Directors hereby
professional engineering, adopt Resolution No. 90-43,
architectural , environmental , land establishing policies and procedures
surveying and construction for the selection and procurement of
management services professional engineering,
architectural , environmental , land
surveying and construction management services. Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizin staff to ssue a
urchase order to F.
E. arleton That staff be, and is hereby,
for rofessiona consul tin services authorized to issue a purchase order
re obtainingAQMD ermits m^ to F. E. Carleton in an amount not to
other SCAQMD issues exceed $50,000.00 for professional
consulting services, on an as-needed
uasis, at the rate of $95.00 per hour, for a two-year period beginning
May 10, 1990, to assist the Districts in obtaining permits from the South
Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) for current and future
projects at both treatment plants, and for assistance relative to other
SCAQMD issues.
-11-
05/09/90
DISTRICTS 1,2 3 5,, 11 a 13
Staff report re Long-range Financ a
Plan Ddate an -91 Sewer
connection ee and use Fee
Recommendations
Verbal staff report The General Manager reported
that in July 1989, as part of
the Districts' u2020 VISION' 30-year Wastewater Management Action Plan,
the Boards approved a Financial Plan prepared by the Action Plan
consulting team. Basically, the Financial Plan provides for financing
sewerage facilities expansion (capacity increases) by sewer connection
fees paid by new development; facilities rehabilitation and improved
treatment by borrowing capital funds in the securities market
(certificates of participation); and operations, maintenance and new
debt service by a combination of property taxes and user fees.
At the April Board Meeting, when ordinances to fix the sewer connection
fees and use fees for 1990-91 were introduced for first reading, some
Directors requested that additional information on the long-range plan
be provided to the Boards. When the Boards originally reviewed the
various elements of the Master Plan the primary document utilized was
the 02020 VISION° Preliminary Report and Executive Summary. Therefore,
prior to this meeting a full copy of the adopted Financial Plan, which
is Volume 8 of the approved Master Plan, was mailed for the Directors'
review. It describes the Financial Plan in considerable detail and
also provides a summary in Chapter 1.
Each year, as part of the budget process, staff updates the fiscal
projections and recommends connection and user fee rates required to
finance Districts' activities for the ensuing year. Also enclosed with
the mailing was a separate staff report reflecting the updated
estimates for those Districts now considering their 1990-91 rates. At
this point the original Master Plan projections are pretty much on
target and, in fact, in most instances, the fee projections are
actually lower than estimated in the Master Plan. However, Districts'
activities are dictated by regulatory authorities whose actions can
cause major changes in the requirements and the cost of the Districts'
wastewater management program. Wastewater management costs will
continue to escalate for four basic reasons: (1) Stricter
environmental standards and regulations; (2) The federal and state
governments no longer fund 871i percent of facilities for improved
' treatment; (3) Normal inflationary trends; and, (4) Rising flows.
The Director of Finance then reported that for many years the
Districts, as part of the annual budgetary process, have forecast
revenues and expenditures on a five-year basis and since 1986-87 have
used a ten-year horizon. The purpose of this long-range financial
planning is to assure that adequate funding is available to carry out
the Districts' wastewater management program for the protection of
public health and the environment, and the benefit of the communities
and the two million citizens which the Districts serve in metropolitan
Orange County.
A major benefit of the long-range cash flow projections is that they
enable a determination well in advance of when revenue shortfalls will
begin to occur so that the Boards of Directors will have adequate time
to consider alternative funding measures and take the necessary actions
to ensure each District's financial integrity.
-12-
05/09/90
For some time projections have indicated that funding shortfalls would
occur throughout the Districts during the latter part of the 1980'5 and
early 1990's, and that each District would have to consider additional
revenue sources to meet long-term funding requirements for sewerage
facilities improvements and expansion and ongoing operations and
maintenance costs. Property taxes, connection fees and federal and
state construction grants have historically been the major source of
local financing of District's activities. However, since Proposition
13 all ad valorem property tax revenue has been used in the Operating
Funds for maintenance, operations and rehabilitation and none has been
available for capital improvements. The costs of providing service
continue to rise beyond the ability of the property tax apportionments
and the past connection fee schedules to keep pace with the stringent
requirements of the federal , state and regional regulatory agencies for
advanced wastewater treatment and air emissions control , and the need
to provide additional facilities to meet the Increasing demands on the
sewerage system.
The Director of Finance further reported that the capital facilities
charge (connection fee) is a one-time fee collected at the time a
building permit is issued and provides for capacity for new .
development. The Districts' 30-year Master Plan adopted in 1989
proposed that this fee be reviewed and adjusted annually. The
recommended adjustment is for an increase of $10 per unit effective
with the 1990-91 fiscal year. The connection fees are identical in
each District to accommodate the collection by the cities on behalf of
the various Districts.
Mr. Streed then briefly reviewed the proposed increases in the sanitary
sewer service charges (user fees) of Districts 1, 3, 5, 6, it and 13,
commenting on the cash flow schedules upon which the staff's
recommendations for adjustments effective with the 1990-91 fiscal year
were based. He noted that District No. 2 just recently enacted an
ordinance adopting sanitary sewer service charges and, therefor, does
not need to. make any adjustments at this time. District No. 7 has not
yet adopted sewer service charges, and the Irvine Ranch Water District
collects and pays user fees to District No. 14 in lieu of District 14
adopting separate sewer service charges.
He noted that in addition to the aforementioned fees, industrial firms
pay a separate user fee based bn their actual demand on the sewerage
system as determined by the provisions of the Districts' uniform
industrial waste ordinance.
The Director of Finance also reported that in accordance with the
recommendations contained in the Financial Plan included as part of the
30-year Master Plan, all Districts, except District 14 and possibly
District 13, will need to issue some form of debt over the next 10
years to meet approximately one-half of the capital needs. The
Issuance of debt also allows a more gradual and stabilized annual
adjustment of user fees to meet fiscal obligations than would otherwise
be required on a cash pay-as-you-go basis.
-13- �,r/
05/09/90
Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Staff Report dated April 25, 1990 re Long-range Financial Plan
Update and 1990-91 Sewer Connection and Use Fee Recommendations, be,
and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,11 8 13
Public hearing and adoption of
ordinances increasing capital
facilities connection charges
Public Hearing The Joint Chairman announced that
this was the time and place
fixed by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 for a public hearing on the following proposed
Ordinances, Amending Ordinances Establishing Wastewater Discharge
Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities:
Amending Repealing
District Ordinance No. Ordinance No. Ordinance No.
1 115 113 114
2 211 208 209
3 313 311 312
5 522 520 521
6 616 614 615
7 724 722 723
11 1112 1110 1111
13 1307 1305 1306
Open Public Hearing The Chairman declared the
hearing open at 8:20 p.m.
Verbal report of General Counsel The Districts' General
Counsel reported that the
proposed ordinances, making adjustments in the capital facilities
connection charges for each of the eight Districts, were
introduced for first reading at the April Board meeting. He
stated that no changes had been made to the ordinances since that
meeting. If adopted, the ordinances will take effect July 11,
1990.
Close hearing The Chairman declared the
hearing closed at 8:21 p.m.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Reading of Proposed
Ordinance No. 115 That proposed Ordinance No. 115,
An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 113 Establishing Wastewater
Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 114, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its
`...✓ entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read
Ordinance No. 115 by title only.
-14-
05/09/90
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried
Adopting Ordinance No. 115 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: James A. Wahner, Chairman, Dan Griset, Charles E. Puckett,
Roger R. Stanton
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
That Ordinance No. 115, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending
Ordinance No. 113 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use
of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 114, be,
and is hereby, adopted.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Reading of Proposed
Ordinance No. 211 That proposed Ordinance No. 211,
An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 208 Establishing Wastewater
Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 209, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its
entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read
Ordinance No. 211 by title only.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried
Adopting Ordinance No. 211 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Iry Pickler, Chairman, Roland E. Bigonger, A. B. "Buck"
Catlin, Dan Griset, William D. Mahoney, Robert H. Main, James
Neal , Carrey J. Nelson, Arthur G. Newton, Don E. Smith,
Roger R. Stanton
NOES: None
ABSENT: Wayne Silzel
That Ordinance No. 211, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Amending
Ordinance No. 208 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use
of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 209, be, ,
and is hereby, adopted.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Reading of Proposed
Ordinance No. 313 That proposed Ordinance No. 313,
An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 311 Establishing Wastewater
Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 312, be read by title only; and, -�
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its
entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read
Ordinance No. 313 by title only.
-15-
05/09/90
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried
Adopting Ordinance Wo. 313 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Richard T. Polis, Chairman, Wes Bannister, A. B. "Buck"
Catlin, Norman E. Culver, Beth Graham, Don R. Griffin, Dan
Griset, James Neal , Carrey J. Nelson, Iry Pickler, J. R. "Bob"
Siefen, Roger R. Stanton, Charles E. Sylvia, Paul Verellen,
Edna Wilson
NOES: None
ABSENT: Margaret M. Arnold
That Ordinance No. 313, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending
Ordinance No. 311 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use
of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 312, be,
and is hereby, adopted.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Reading of Proposed
Ordinance No. 522 That proposed Ordinance No. 522,
An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 520 Establishing Wastewater
Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 521, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its
entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read
Ordinance No. 522 by title only.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried
Adopting Ordinance No. 522 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Evelyn Hart, Chairman, Phil Sansone, Roger R. Stanton
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
That Ordinance No. 522, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending
Ordinance No. 520 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use
of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 521, be,
and is hereby, adopted.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Reading of Proposed
Ordinance No. 616 That proposed Ordinance No. 616,
An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 614 Establishing Wastewater
Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 615, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its
entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read
Ordinance No. 616 by title only.
-16-
05/09/90
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried
Adopting Ordinance No. 616 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman, Roger R. Stanton, James A. Wahner
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
That Ordinance No. 616, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending
Ordinance No. 614 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use
of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 615, be,
and is hereby, adopted.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Reading of Proposed
Ordinance No. 724 That proposed Ordinance No. 724,
An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 722 Establishing Wastewater -
Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 723, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its
entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read
Ordinance No. 724 by title only.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried
Adopting Ordinance No. 724 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Don E. Smith, Chairman, John C. Cox, Jr., Richard B. Edgar,
Dan Griset, Sally Anne Sheridan, Roger R. Stanton, James A.
Wahner
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
That Ordinance No. 724, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Amending
Ordinance No. 722 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use
of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 723, be,and is hereby, adopted.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
econd Reading of Proposed
Ordinance No. 1112 That proposed Ordinance No. 1112,
An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 1110 Establishing Wastewater
Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 1111, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its
entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read
Ordinance No. 1112 by title only.
-17-
05/09/90
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried
Adopting Ordinance No. 1112 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Grace H. Winchell , Chairman, Tom Mays, Roger R. Stanton
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
That Ordinance No. 1112, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California,
Amending Ordinance No. 1110 Establishing Wastewater Discharge
Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing
Ordinance No. 1111, be, and is hereby, adopted.
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
econd Reading of Proposed
Ordinance No. 1307 That proposed Ordinance No. 1307,
An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 1305 Establishing Wastewater
Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 1306, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its
entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read
Ordinance No. 1307 by title only.
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried
Adopting Ordinance No. 1307 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Henry W. Wedaa, Chairman, Iry Pickler, Don E. Smith, Roger R.
Stanton, Wayne D. Wedin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
That Ordinance No. 1307, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California,
Amending Ordinance No. 1305 Establishing Wastewater Discharge
Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing
Ordinance No. 1306, be, and is hereby, adopted.
DISTRICTS 1,3,5,6,1I & 13
Public hearing and adoption of
ordinances increasing sanitary
sewer service charges
Public Hearing The Joint Chairman announced that
this was the time and place fixed
by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 3, 5,
6, it and 13 for a public hearing on the following proposed Ordinances,
Amending Ordinances Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges:
�.✓ -18-
05/09/90
Amending Repealing
District Ordinance No. Ordinance No. Ordinance No.
1 116 109 112
3 314 309 N/A
5 523 516 519
6 617 609 fill 8 613
11 1113 1108 1109
13 1308 1303 N/A
Open Public Hearing The Chairman declared the
hearing open at 8:24 p.m.
Verbal report of General Counsel The Districts' General
Counsel reported that the
proposed ordinances, providing for adjustments to the sanitary
sewer service charges, were introduced for first reading at the
April Board meeting. He stated that no changes had been made. If -
adopted, the ordinances will take effect July 1, 1990.
Close hearing The Chairman declared the
hearing closed at 8:25 p.m.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Reading of Proposed
Ordinance No. 115 That proposed Ordinance No. 116,
An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 109 Establishing Sanitary Sewer
Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 112, be read by title
only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its
entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read
Ordinance No. 116 by title only.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried
Adopting Ordinance No. 116 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: James A. Wahner, Chairman, Dan Griset, Charles E. Puckett,
Roger R. Stanton
NOES: None
.ABSENT: None
That Ordinance No. 116, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending
Ordinance No. 109 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 112, be, and is hereby, adopted.
-19-
05/09/90
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Read n of Pro osed
r finance No. 14 That proposed Ordinance No. 314,
An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 309 Establishing Sanitary Sewer
Service Charges, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its
entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read
Ordinance No. 314 by title only.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried
Adopting Ordinance No. 714 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Richard T. Polls. Chairman, Wes Bannister, A. B. "Buck"
Catlin, Norman E. Culver, Beth Graham, Don R. Griffin, Dan
Griset, James Neal , Carrey J. Nelson, Iry Pickler, J. R. "Bob"
Siefen, Roger R. Stanton, Charles E. Sylvia, Paul Verellen,
Edna Wilson
NOES: None
ABSENT: Margaret M. Arnold
That Ordinance No. 314, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending
Ordinance No. 309 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be, and
Is hereby, adopted.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
econd Reading of Proposed
Ordinance No. 523 That proposed Ordinance No. 523,
An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer
Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 519, be read by title
only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its
entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read
Ordinance No. 523 by title only.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried
Adopting Ordinance No. 523 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Evelyn Hart, Chairman, Phil Sansone, Roger R. Stanton
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
That Ordinance No. 523, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending
`.� Ordinance No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 519, be, and is hereby, adopted.
-20-
05/09/90
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Reading of Proposed
rdinance NO. 617 That proposed Ordinance No. 617,
An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, �✓
California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer
Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance Nos. fill and 613, be read by
title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its
entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read
Ordinance No. 617 by title only.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried
Adopting Ordinance No. 617 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman, Roger R. Stanton, James A. Wahner
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
That Ordinance No. 617, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending
Ordinance No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and
Repealing Ordinance Nos. 611 and 613, be, and is hereby, adopted.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Reading of Proposed
Ordinance No. 11IJ That proposed Ordinance No. 1113,
An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 1108 Establishing Sanitary Sewer
Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1109, be read by title
only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its
entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read
Ordinance No. 1113 by title only.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried
Adopting Ordinance No. 1113 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Grace H. Winchell , Chairman, Tom Mays, Roger R. Stanton
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
That Ordinance No. 1113, An Ordinance of theBoard of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California,
Amending Ordinance No. 1108 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service
Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1109, be, and is hereby, adopted.
_21_
05/09/90
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Second Reading of Propose
Ordinance No. 13 That proposed Ordinance No. 1308,
An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 1303 Establishing Sanitary Sewer
Service Charges, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its
entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read
Ordinance No. 1308 by title only.
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried
Adopting Ordinance No. OUT by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Henry W. Wedaa, Chairman, Iry Pickler, Don E. Smith, Roger R.
Stanton, Wayne D. Wedin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
That Ordinance No. 1308, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California,
Amending Ordinance No. 1303 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service
Charges, be, and is hereby, adopted.
DISTRICTS 1 3 5,6 11 & 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Directing the ounty Auditor-
Controller to include sewer service That the Boards of Directors hereby
charges on property tax bills adapt the following resolutions
commencing with 1990- 1 fiscal year directing the County Auditor-Controller
to include sewer service charges on
the property tax bills, pursuant to Ordinances of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 3, 5, 6, 11 and 13 of Orange County, commencing with the
1990-91 fiscal year:
District Resolution No. Ordinance No.
1 90-44-1 116
3 90-45-3 314
5 90-46-5 523
6 90-47-6 617
11 90-48-11 1113
13 90-49-13 1308
Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these
minutes.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m. , May 9, 1990.
-22-
05/09/90
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
rovin an a Order No. 6 to the
ans and s ecifications Tor That Change Order No. 6 to the plans
Contract NOS. Z-4b-Z and - 7 and specifications for Portion of
Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between
Edinger Avenue and Lampson Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2, and South Anaheim
Relief Sewer, on Ball Road between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract
No. 2-27, authorizing an addition of $77,778.00 to the contract with
W. H. Ebert Corp. for six items of additional work and granting a time
extension of 14 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be,
and is hereby, approved.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the General Manager to _
issue a urchase order to outhern That the General Manager be, and is
al ifornia Gas Company for relocation hereby, authorized to issue a purchase
Gof asa n m in order to construct order to Southern California Gas
ontract No. Company in an amount not to exceed
$7D,000.00 and to execute necessary
documents, in form approved by the General Counsel , for relocation of
approximately 1,400 feet of 4-inch diameter gas main required in connection
with construction of the Katella Relief Sewer, between Broadway and
Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract No. 2-28.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m. , May 9, 1990.
DISTRICTS 5 8 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change rder No. 1 to the
Tans and s ecifications for That Change Order No. I to the plans
Contract Nos. 5- 7-1 and 5- 7-2 and specifications for Rehabilitation
of Balboa Trunk Sewer, Between 32nd
Street and Coronado Street, Contract No. 5-27-1, and Investigation of
Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 5-37-2, authorizing an
addition of $1,305.00 to the contract with National Plant Services, Inc. for
additional video inspection services, and granting a time extension of 60
calendar days for delay in starting the project to allow the contractor to
complete emergency repair work to sewers in San Francisco damaged by the
October 1990 earthquake, be, and is hereby, approved.
DISTRICTS 5 8 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Accepting Contract Nos. 5-27-1 and
5-37-2 as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 90-50, accepting
Rehabilitation of Balboa Trunk Sewer, Between 32nd Street and Coronado
Street, Contract No. 5-27-1, and Investigation of Pacific Coast Highway
Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 5-37-2, as complete, authorizing execution of a
Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said
resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of ^
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m. , May 9, 1990.
-23-
05/09/90
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the. meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m. , May 9, 1990.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ordering Annexation No. 1
arrett Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby
adopts Resolution No. 90-51-7,
ordering annexation of 2.47 acres of territory to the District in the
vicinity of Amapola Avenue and Orange Park Boulevard in unincorporated
County territory (Annexation No. 129 - Garrett Annexation to County
Sanitation District No. 7). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby
made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
ovi eimbure nt Agreement
witheorgdamm .e That the Board of Directors hereby
adopts Resolution No. 90-52-7,
approving Reimbursement Agreement with George Adams, Jr. , providing for
reimbursement to Mr. Adams by the District of a .proportional share of his
cost of constructing a sewer line in Baja Panorama Street, to be collected
from the owners of Lots 7 and 9 of Tract No. 939 upon connection to the
sewer. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m. , May 9, 1990.
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m. , May 9, 1990.
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m. , May 9, 1990.
"Now -24-
05/09/90
DISTRICTS 3 & 11
Actions re financin desi n,
constrnc ion, Cdpdc7ty 0W arship ana
o eration of certain master- loaned
sewa a collection facilit es for
serving is ricts i and ii; and tne
Balsa Chico area presently outside
the Districts' boundaries
Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering
reported that studies have been
completed over the past several years which analyzed and prioritized
the needed sewage facilities for serving certain areas within
District 3 and District 11, and the area generally described as Bolsa
Chica which is presently outside the Districts' boundaries, concluding
that the long-planned extension of the Coast Trunk Sewer should be
replaced with the reconstruction of the Slater Avenue Pump Station by
both Districts 3 and 11, and recommending that construction costs be
shared in accordance with sewage flows generated from each District.
This change is projected to save District 3 $600,000 and District 11
$4,700,000.
Said studies include a 1988 report prepared by Willdan Associates which
dealt with the possible exchange of drainage areas between Districts 3
and 11; the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master
Plan (30-year Wastewater Management Action Plan, 112020 VISION,,); and a
recently-completed Project Report on the Slater Avenue Pump Station
Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17.
The Director of Engineering reviewed various elements of the reports,
noting that the most urgent improvements needed are the reconstruction
of the Slater Avenue Pump Station including the influent and discharge
facilities for the pump station. These facilities will cost
approximately $7,600,000. The second priority is replacement of the
Goldenwest Trunk Sewer, between Heil Avenue and Slater Avenue, at a
cost of $4,300,000. He also noted that additional facilities required
include the parallel Slater Avenue Trunk, the Heil Avenue Interceptor,
improvements to facilities in Warner Avenue west of Springdale Street,
and new lines in Springdale and Goldenwest Streets north of McFadden
Avenue and Edinger Avenue, respectively.
Mr. Dawes advised that the proposed capacity exchanges in certain
existing and proposed sewage facilities would result in a net equity
purchase from District 11 by District 3 in the amount of $630,836.00.
He added that the proposed agreement between Districts 3 and 11 would
provide for payment by District 3 in the amount of $1,050,000 and
District it in the amount of $16,950,000 for the total cost of
facilities described above, including the joint $7,600,000
reconstruction of the Slater Avenue Pump Station, influent sewers and
discharge facilities.
The necessary capital for these facilities could be provided by fees
from the development of Balsa Chica and other vacant areas within the
northwesterly portion of District 11 if collected on a timely basis. ^
For District 3, the development of Holly-Seacliff properties would more
than offset the funding necessary for their prorated share of the
Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements.
-25-
05/09/90
With regard to development of the Bolsa Chica area, staff reported that
in April 1987 the Directors of District 11 authorized staff and General
Counsel to negotiate with owners of approximately 1,608 acres in the
Bolsa Chica area. The Signal Bolsa Corporation is the principal
`..►� landowner. The Bolsa Chica area is presently outside the boundary of
District 11 but within its sphere of influence. Signal Bolsa
principals and counsel and Districts' staff and counsel have met
numerous times over the past several years in an attempt to come to a
pre-annexation agreement. However, Signal Balsa Corporation is not yet
ready to annex and recently advised staff that they are no longer
willing to proceed with the proposed pre-annexation agreement. The
last draft of the proposed agreement provided for the annexation of the
Bolsa Chica area and pre-payment of fees for those areas to be
developed by Signal Bolsa to provide the necessary funding for
construction of capacity In the Slater Pump Station system to serve the
Bolsa Chica if and when it is annexed.
Staff emphasized that it is necessary to proceed with design and
construction of the Slater Pump Station system and the Districts cannot
delay the project any longer waiting for Signal Bolsa Corporation to
make up its mind on the issue of a pre-annexation agreement.
The Director of Engineering pointed out that if capacity for the Bolsa
Chica is not included in the Slater Pump Station system, Signal Bolsa
would have to construct its own sewer lines through the Bolsa Chica
area and tie into the Districts' Coast Trunk Sewer at a cost that would
be substantially higher than putting up the money. now for capacity in
the Slater Pump Station system. Funding and construction of the
facilities to connect to the Districts' Coast Trunk Sewer would have to
be provided by the property owners/developers.
Staff and Directors then entered into a lengthy discussion relative to
whether or not the Slater Avenue Pump Station should be sized to
provide for capacity for the Bolsa Chica area. In response to a
request for clarification on the issue of whether or not to include
capacity for Bolsa Chica in the Slater Avenue Pump Station system, the
staff and General Counsel pointed out that if such capacity was
Included without the benefit of a pre-annexation agreement with the
property owners to provide the necessary funding, in effect the
rate-payers in Districts 3 and 11 would have to front the costs without
any assurance that they would be recovered in the future. Staff
further advised that because of the urgent need to proceed with design
and construction of the facilities they had notified Signal Bolsa
Corporation that they must make a decision by May 15, 1990 on the
pre-annexation agreement, and that without such an agreement the
Districts could provide no assurance that the area could be annexed or
provided sewerage service by the Districts in the future. It was also
pointed out that officials representing the City of Huntington Beach,
In whose sphere of influence Bolsa Chica also lies, have been kept
apprised of the matter.
Fallowing further discussion it was the consensus of the Directors that
unless a pre-annexation agreement is executed by the Bolsa Chica
property owners, capacity to serve the area should not be included in
the -Districts' sewage system.
-26
05/09/90
Staff noted that the Directors were not being asked that evening to
make a decision on the capacity issue. Final design and sizing of the _
Slater Avenue Pump Station system will be presented to the Board for
consideration at a future date.
Receive, file and approve Staff Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Report
That the Staff Report dated
May 1, 1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
Receive file, a rove and adopt
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
the ro ec Report re on rac
No. 11-17 prepared by John aro a That the Project Report relative
Engineers to Slater Avenue Pump Station
Sewage System Improvements,
Contract No. 11-17, dated April 3, 1990, prepared by John Carollo
Engineers, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed, approved and
adopted.
A rovin A reement between Moved, seconded and duly carried:
is r c 5 in tl 11 re financing,
desi n construction ca acit That the Boards of Directors
owners an 05
era an o cer a n hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-53,
sewage collection facilities approving Agreement between
County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 3 and 11 providing for financing, design, construction, capacity
ownership and operation of certain master-planned sewage collection
facilities for serving Districts 3 and 11. Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
Authorizing staff and General Moved, seconded and duly carried:
ounse o ne ofEle ate with eneral
elephone and c ron cs to That staff and General Counsel
secure a site ce ad'an to ex st n be, and are hereby, authorized to
Slater venue Pump
um tation for negotiate with General Telephone
construction of new pump station and Electronics (GTE) to secure
a site adjacent to the existing
Slater Avenue Pump Station for construction of the new pump station,
providing for the exchange of the existing, smaller site for the new
site, upon abandonment of the existing pump station; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized
to execute the necessary documents to effect such exchange, in form
approved by the General Counsel ; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That payment to GTE in an amount not to exceed
$25,000.00 for said exchange, be, and is hereby, authorized.
27-
05/09/90
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:57 p.m., May 9, 1990.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:57 p.m., May 9, 1990.
3ecre ary oP the Boards of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14
u -28-
fuNC Nn 9159 - jr FIST WORK INO CAr ITAL PPOCESSIN6 DATE 1/01/9C PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER Ar13
•rya1..T .F.e GATT 1-LOON/• _ _.--__�____.__
r CLAIMS PAID 01/21/90v POSTING
iNG GATT PO/1]/90
�eovAu. u ue unnv me rovn nu
1D5996 ARS KENT. INC. $167.53 INSTRUMENT PARTS
.U-- INS+vnuv
105998 AIR 14DUSTRIES CORP. i172.9P REFUND USER FEN OVERPAYMENT
105999 AIR PRODUCTS i CHEMICAL INC. $940.36 PACKING MATERIALS
_ I... _ M ryAyDrP r _ ee�gl .onrF
136[DI SAFETY SUPPLY AMERICA S2.601.19 INSTRUMENT/SAFETY SUPPLIES
106202 ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO. S59.2M REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
5-58___..__ oe ym
21 106001 ALVARADO MILLS. INC. $139.22 REFUND USER PER OVERPAYMENT
106005 AMER. INS?. L.A. TECH. CENTEP S995.GU TRAINING CLASS REGISTRATION
S— vm — w wvvAYMOUPE
1066A7 ROP.CO INC. S/OR AMERICAN SEALS $5.474.77 SEALS/CASKETS v __..
17 106000 AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY $329.3P FILM
.A.7__. ^'^ IRER FEL nvvvveT__
106010 ANAHEIM MEDICAL SQUARE iB9.Bl REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
ti
106011 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION i27.631.75 SEWER REPAIRS
nN 106013 ULAKE P. ANDERSON 1675.11 T !¢EYING EXPENSE
' fTi I06P11 141MINY-S MECH. i MACHINE. INC 52.62B.2R MECHANICAL PARTS
X135
mm Paaa.yL.._._.._ TEMYDBARIL$¢BIIICEE__ __._ _
106016 AQUATIC BIOASSAY 6 CONSULTING 92 A10.00 OCEAN SAIELE
1 172 106017 ANATEX SERVICES, INC. 63,511.70 UNIFORM SERVICE
3' ruRmR— Pxv
106019 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT 6844.06 INSTRUMENT REPAIR
]> 1D6 A29 ART WORKS $511.27 FRAMING SERVICES
1010 AVOIDAO _ _NET)& meovP ___
106022 BFM ENERGY PPODUC TS CORP. i1.302.6C REFUND USER FR¢ OVEPPAYlEXT
10E023 BFM TRANSPORT DYNAMICS CORP. $678:52 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
v
106125 BALLY RETAIL. INC. $150.00 BACKUP CLAIM
106C26 BANCROFT-UHIINEY CO. $433.65 PUBLICATION
.nRPPT v.u. HAD..', Aun . enr. _ ca av+.n. ___ rnuamvnrmmv a rvg_p1:.3A 1A2._P2e]L_._.._—
106026 BARTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $1.246.71 LAB SUPPLIES
106029 BLASIUS ELECTRIC TRUCK. INC. $87.71 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
_ fanre oevma __ _
106P31 BORLAND INTERNATIONAL 957.62 PUBLICATIONS
ITEM BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP $904.03 ENGINEERING SERVICRS
_ .1
106034 ARGUN i CALDWELL CONSULTING $298,715.21 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19
u
706035 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $1,716.34 MOTOR
�. .PI.S. near .._ cram. yS+n_aA PETI4_Ceeu vvxw
106037 [ A D GREASE COMPANY $1.108.17 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
106D36 CAT 6164.1. REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT
xPArW NPIIR FNTF PF a1SF511
106040 CAL-CNEM SALES $36.76 HARDWARE
106041 CAL SOUTH EOUIPMENT CO. S502.60 INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION
FUND NO 939- - JT GIST VOPPINA CtP17AL PROCESSING DATE 4/0t/9l PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AF43
CLAIMS PAID 09/11/MD POSTING DATE L9/11/9u
+ u.eP.u• ..n_ ur unnP
IIE142 CALTROL • INC, 3714.23 ELECTRIC SUPPLIM
__ N• •36•-1:--_._.___.. BLI-PAITS-
2060AA CALIF. ENERGY COMM. PUG. MS-13 612.63 REFUND USER
106095 CASA 4RANDE CONVALESCENT .- 6612.61 REFUND ➢SER F8¢ OV¢RPADHLN'2
•nc nec r
SAFETY 6- ------- ----
6067 CITY. FOR ADVANCED PROF. GFV. i1.390.ef REGISTRLATION
10604E CENTURY INST. f SUfI . $362.6- $APETV SUPPLIES
• I6959 CHRenrur. CORP.
37-1
106051 CHURCH VE CORP. f$1.572.51 ENGIN ERING SERVICES
106051 CHURCH ENGINEERING. INC. S1•ST2.51 6NGINERRINC SBIPICRS ]-Il
—
lo&
106053 CONNEESS OF COMPONENTS OF CALIF f21.$16.41 PIRG PARTS
IRIIgA [O NN ELL G.M. PARTS / DIV. 316.N TRUCK PARTS
• -
10605E CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO $5.912.8.N3 CILUPINB M.O.10-11-87
106057 CONTINENTAL. GRAPHICS fA•Iq 0.T5 RLUEPBINTINC 9
AS--__-- ELECTRIC SUPPLIES ----
106P BOSS cnN. INC. $953.R3 ENGINE REPAIRS
'-' fTl ]REPELGD I
COOPER NDUSTR lES• INC. t1.I15 d]9.E5 ENGINES M.0.3-13-87,6-11-88, J-19A
----------------
" = 206062 CRAZY
SHIRTS. INCAPNELL 3367.91 RIOTING U ERRVICCS
106063 CRp2T SHIRTS. H fA 652.0E REYUNO USER FEE OVeRPAYMENT
•5--- —RENTAL-GLBANNEFJ-7-4--_- —
"=--I 136066 CAL WATER
CUR ••3136.75 SLUDGE EqUIPMENT
F.n 1II6066 LpPPY CUP TI TRUER t EQUIPMENT 322.Og0.GT SLUICE REMOVAL M.O.A-Il-88
•.cna• —y2iS.t:.--_. -88MIMA8-RLCILTRATION--._ ____..---.-._-__
.N 10606E EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT
DEFT f5 d68.19 SEATS UNSU FEE
INSURANCE
I106D69...7. CA U.EMPLOYMENT DEVELOP MEMT $ 4A.39 REFUND 088E PLC 09¢XPAYN811T
1G6e71 DAT APPO RESEARCH CORP. •4,573.61 PULLICATION
1060 T2 BE AN2A CDRPOP FTION tq.571.61 BBPUND USER FEE OVBRPAYMBNT
'--__ -l.Ir7• c.TAx nrvre Reu _____ uca.u.. ELOCNUI&5BRTSC86
206075 OICNSONS $133.997.72 PRINTING PARTS
106075 - DIFI01-ILI-PO ASSOCIATES $1.99T.T2 PRINTING
„- •nana _.DOkADDLENTERPRISES. INC..�--___—_--SSA5.64 --- PLANT MAINTENANCE--
.._-_____._. _ ..
106C77 DUTADO BROS.
IN . $25•T21.6q PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 TSPAI118
1 TRO TB TUNE EL GPAS. MACH MOVING 5900.00 ENGINE UNLOADING COSTS
106'J24__—EASTMANSALES--___ _35R2.7 .----.OFFICE SUP.RARTS--__.__—___.—._
166081 EAS THAN• INC. $2.766.35 OFFICE SUPPLIES
a
1G6081 EL TOPITO 11I R f7B6.35 REFUND U38R FEE OVERPAYMCNR
•nanRP JEFFRESbEA p Rrcm err .A550G- 171.56
206004 JEFF ITIER f1T1.36 HAREAGE
DWARE
106PLtl FACILITIES SUPPORT CO. 3121.0E LAPTYARE
•1.. _ _ J-20.____-_
06086 FEDERAL E7PRE$S CORP. S57." AIR NEICR1
106087 IERRELLGAS S45.46 PROPANE
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1/0A/94 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
—_-GCCLAIMS1 PAID U41111STA1LOS-0NG BATEE-000NW
CLAIMS PAID UA/11/90 POSTING GATE CR/I I/90
_y3eo.uT V6 VF NOOR ^`SCAtAii AN __.___
1060E8 FICO°S APPLIANCE SERVICC S70.13 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
106090 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $508.97 FILTERS
106011 FISCHER 1 PORTER CO. S1.390.03 CHLORINATION PARTS
^ 2 UC',""Ci --. ,..2.••• RE LAB-8UPP6LE6 -_.—.-
106C93 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA 503.30 FILM -_
106094 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $6,125.94 WATER USEADE
136096 GAS RESTAURANT SVCS $6,737.86 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
106097 GARDEN GROVE PROF. BLDG. $196.66 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT _
�LL .... .300 9, F•ERRGLASG -----
106099 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,693.61 TELEPHONE SERVICES -
106161 GEORGE LEECH a ASSOCIATES S1B8.81 SNITCH
589 0• •RCTAUMRRI'�ABT _____.._.__.__.___
106102 61ERLICH-MITCMELL. INC. $18.456.34 MECHANICAL PUTS
106103 GIAPHIC CONTROLS $509.15 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES _
.3r 920 00 e11fLN86RLMG-SBRVa666a66-SB-T2-
106105 HACH COMPANY $34.19 LAB SUPPLIES _
M 176106 MARCO CORPORATION 36.373.29 KPICNANICAL PARTS
$27S 00 METIN.RART -_.__. ....
W= 106108 HMICHAELEWLETT HEIN2 S271.B8 METING 6 ONAIMIMG EXPENSE
106309 NEVI C76 PACRARO COMPANY a30B.07 COMPRESSOR
No' -- 1
677 77 BATTERIES PARTS ---��
1 1361I1 MOUSE Oi BATTERIESIS- 1560.89 HARDWARES
n 106112 P.S. NV 6PE3 CO.. INC. S1.724.82 HARDWARE
T19611] `•ON-QEACN-- -._.-_ __ i$70.82 1 EFI ND USER
W 106115 MUNTING70H PEACH CO. 170.82 RUBBED USER S¢¢ OVERPAYMENT
1061115 HUNTING TOM BEACH RUBBER STAMP 1198.59 RUBBER STAMPS _
♦s_ -.__.__ 1091
3061 IMPERIAL
SR L VEST CHEMICAL 981 .73 BONNIE CHLORIDE H.O.11-08-89
306116 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PPBURETS $689.11 CONNECTORS _
106120 INLAND ^•PER ---- ---S1.825 91 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
--Al
106120 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. f1.$20.53 EQUIPMENT GENIAL
1..... [RVTNE RANCH WATER DISTRICT f20.3] RATES US6AC8
—116123 JENSEN I TOOESY ALLOYS
VACUUM BAG�UBFLF35
1-622] JENSEN TOOLS S ALLOYS $466.91 OFFICE BAGS
13612A JOY CE OFFICE PRODUCTS La06.9. OFFICE SUPPLIES -
-1 • LIES __ _......_.. Y1L.85 UPFIC6SURBLI85
10612E KAMER BEARINGS t SUPPLY .690.35 PITTINGS
WEA
106127 NLNER COMPANY $1.6B0.38 TOOLS/NARDVARB
nK wP .or.P ur .noe_
—.-1 °LOP. rm ____._.._. ... _ .__521.591-r° INSTRUMENT
106130 NAY-RAY° INC. S695.237.62 INSTRUMENT PARTS
106130 THE NEI TN COMPANIES $1.277.62 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3-75636
- 1061]L Ke.•u-SSEJIEYS.-1.01L—,—_____._ _.. __.
10613 KING BEARING. INC. i12.386.26 OLAHICAL PARTS -
106133
NNOR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES fAA.17 17 TOOLS _
FUND NO 9199 JT ➢IST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING nATE 4/P4/9E• PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
rmmTr s3ulieTlnu me RICTx nF SBA"I Iola
CLAIMS PAID 04/11/90 POSTING DATE 04/12/94
.-..BRAY. ... urxnne +YT -,� rCrRipTlnu
106134 EASTMAN KODAK CO. $89.9E LAB SUPPLIES
10613 L.R. LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS . PUMP PARTS
TPRAURCTTSS
10613
7 LA tl.1NTA MOTOR INN 3212.37 REFUND
USER PB8 OVERPAYMENf
1RAJRa a o rea u _-_ -_. _ TD.SSER-b2E-OVeRPAY12N'f--------_-._.
16139 LAV SAFETY SUPPLY CO. f190.96 SAFETY SUPPLIES
I06190 H.V. LAYMASTCR 3 CO., INC. f91162.76 SOIL TESTING
_ 104. 0 RRAINn ➢PP D EPAY�NT__.-_.
10619E LEARN Y .9 TRAINING MANUALS
1V6143 LE ROT CRANDALL f ASSOC. S2
.216.97 ._..__.. .
CEOTECMNIGL INSP¢CTION
_ lnuea ( AVID L. L MAX EPDXY ae5O.Ce, ._._ S WER RIEUIGl'ER _____,_
106195 DAVID L. TOMAY OM INJ. 36.750.4A REFUND
RUSERF
106196 LOS ALANITPS CCONO WASH $696.9P R¢FUN➢ USER PEE OVERPAYMENT
_ 1061r) Pura In. $91B.27.__-_- CEANOMONI MONITORING
106198 NBC NUCLEAR INC.VIR ONNENTAL $355.94 OCEAN SUPPLIES
106199 NOS NUCLEAR I 3355.99 LAB SUPPLIES
1 06 1551n MMPA Cx➢MEtl a19$197.2b _MAINTENANCE CONTRACT
106152 AINTENANC[ PRODUCTS. INC. $509.52 E POLYURETHANE
_ toil.• YeC1Y1 [ QI+CCIY _eLrj.,GC _..... Pl•INI0.1Hp PRrTR__ „______
T 106154 MARSHALL MAINT, PRODUCTIONS 11 f55.00 TRAINING VIDEOS
• '+� 106155 MAR VAC ELECTRONICS 947.59 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
16A1RA YI iT . CYI nP. Ixr_ Cx.)p9 Z5._. RLPCTRT f. 511PPL1RB .
146157 MCKr NNA ENGP. f EQUIP. f2.303.5d PACKING MATERIALS
106159 MCLEAN MIDWEST f11598.SP AIR CONDITIONER
Y I 1n61Re E.S. MEANS CR x PP Y rr. 774.65. PUBLICLCAI�PARIR__-
+'Z 106161 R.S. MEANS CO., INC. f153.26 MILEAGE
306161 TM OM AS P. MCL TON $I%R.Y6 COMPUTE
++ 206163 MIDLAh30 FGYPCORR S3B7.15 COMPPIPE SUPPLIES
LIES
106164 NINE ISO MFG. CORP. $909.92 PIPE SVPPLILI
1061.5 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES AS CO. f909.9P SAFETY SUPPLIES
_ 106166 _ MONTUByxxl rnxxnxrR n rCi_._-_ vew.yy _REFUND USEB_[EE
_ 196167 MONTGOME CARPETS f990.80 REFUND VICE FEE OVERPAYMENT
106167 MONTGOM EPT LABORATORIES $B113A.00 LAB L SERVICES
_ 106369 MORTONY SUIRELSALT
CO,
OR 215.4R _SMALL HARDWARE;
106170 MOTION SALT AND/OR f111.31 SALT
1p"TV MOTION IN CELLULAR INC. f69.31 MECHANICAL PARTS
_ 1n6n1 NATIONAL HEAT
THE Rr Ru CrkCO. _ __._. u9.b2 CRLL�PRFREEEO __-..._-
196173 NATIONAL PLAT TREATING COINING 3220.2E VACUUM USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT
106173 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES. INC. $3.56E.l0 VACUUM TRUCK FEES
y 106175 OCA,LDSUL_$BFFTYCO. rO11N f.11 _ $813.24 _FITTINGS
PEES
l06175 NEWA SUPPLY CO. fB13.89 POSTINGS
m
106176 NE 4A PK CLEC TR Ou]CS s01 S.EM INSTRUMENT PARTS
+•__ 106177 OVENAM _NT___-
_ 10617 NORDSTROM $56.93 VBC PREOVERPAYMENT
106179 NORTHWEST ROTOR WELDING, INC. i9.500.00 MECHABLCAI.
PARTS
FUAU x0 9195 - JT DIST MORNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/49/9: PAGE
RTPORT NUMBER AP93
—__ rnuuT.Y3AkJ.TAi10P nwrc vre OF. ne.nCC rnux.v
CLAIMS FA7p 09/I1/90 POSTING PATE Y/I1/90
LJMAnn eNr W _ vrun n. __- nrerv,P[,nu ____
106300 OFFICE PAVILION/1117ERTDR P.LS. S9,059.37 OFFICE FURNITURE J-7-4
.__.__ PUBLIGA7ION --__._-___ .____
106182 THE OHNART COPP 62,008.9E INSTRUMENT PARTS
106183 ORANGE BEARING. INC. 5162.67 BELTS
_ cu. -
1061P5 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO FARTS CO. S1S7.41 TRUCK PARTS
106166 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. 6780.91 REFUND USSR PEE OVERPAYMENT
106188 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $281.27 MECHANICAL PARTS
106189 ORANGE VALVE B FITTING CO. $358.86 FITTINGS
n•ALSFESSING
106192 COUNTY OF ITANIF 62,953.D•. DATA NGElSSINC 'iSRVICSS
106192 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 313.228.9P REI10UR6C WORKER'S COMB` INSVRANCE
10619 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY S859.55 CASKET
106195 PACIFIC PARTS fllA.% BATfBBIES
l9 APSTHONE SERVICES
_
"fn 1^.6197 PACIFIC BELL 629.99 SBLEPtlONE SERVIC65
1 x 166198 P6CTCL CELLULAR 65R.IE CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES
CTRIC.PARTS -._.
.n W 10620L PATHFINDER INSTRUMENTS $125.35 ELECTRICAL PARTS
106262 PHOTO t SOUND [O. 5125.OS REPAIRS
146203 PLASTIC INDUSTRIES f14 1.91 PLASTICS
'—`D (467pe POLYPURE. INC. $19.657.29 FOLYMAR M.O.8-9-89,1-10-90
s I LOAIDS nury r1E,r TPn c ' rp_ u26..J2— __--PJ,ECTRiC3UPP1165
"CI 111211 POWER SPECIALISTS. INC. $46.93 MIGHT
IP6207 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE S72.60 ICE
^ T•OYiMSEtCPI0LN.0.B !0•RB
1CF269 R.F.M. ELECTRIC MOTORS S4,877.39 ELECTRIC MOTOR
166215 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $856.99 TRAStl MOVAL
_ 10621 Prfrr. Pxf_ ..e•un_nn _. SILDGLRENOVAL-tl.0.3+11-BL.___. __-__.__..._
106212 REOI EXPRESS 579. 0 SUPPLIES
I06213 THE REGISTER S1,I95.60 NOTICES A ADS
.n[215 n Nr I LT[ - nn
I021 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. S2.433. INSTRUMENT
PARTS8INOS
1462I6 RICnAFOS. WATSON t GCPSION 9
10,137.92 LEGAJ SERVICES 6-LL-86
l L. 106 [any075.31 RlC SUPLIEVICCS J-20. .- ..____ _-_._ ._-_...
106219 ROYAL WHOLESALE
LESALE ELECALCTRIC
f2$692.66 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
106219 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC f692.64 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
___1Il622n ed[crr.n rru roeoc_ aPaa_dn. . vevSv n neuvP
106222 SANTA ANT ELECTDESIGNS
MOTORS $4,519.97 OFFCIIRICICES PARS
106222 SEA Cm DESIGNS f9.519.fi1 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
_ 106ll�224 SEAR n[ Orel wf[f• TOOLR.D6'EAGE_ ... __
106225 SEARS, ROEBUCK 6 CO. S369.95 TOOLS
1062ES $NANRDEM SUPPLY $1,600.7A tlAPDNAIIL
u
FUND NC ela9 - JT 9151 WORKING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/u4/9. PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNI.LSAW TAT•^LL-0IS714II 01_.ORANGE.
CLAIMS PAID 04/11/90 POSTING DATE i4/11/90
'_-LAERA4LE➢�- v¢ynnR AUUN1-...... .
--
lot.226 SILVER SPRINGS RATER 43.131.4E REFUND USSR PEE OVERPAYMENT
10622 SO.T ENTRY CO. 9.01' BOIL TASTING M.0.6-14-89
106229
CO
30. COAST Alp UUA LI TT 596 3$89.4: APPLICATION FEES
` -1➢4232-_. en. rw ASTcr R QUALITY
10A232 SO. COAST AIR DUALITY 31.95B.RC APPLICATION PE85
1062]7 30. COAST AIR DUALITY 32E5.0P TRUCK-FARTS
.n.231 Cnuru RN C E �A.41, ..._TRUCK-FARTS- ...
106235 SOUTHERN CALIF.AEDIS ED130N CO. 36.799.3E POWER
1M443S S0. CALIF. CDI SON CO. 36.723.DU POKER POLE RELOCATION
E 10623 UESTALLOT
O $1,648.74 MOLS/WLDLNG SUPPLIES
106278 GREECE SPEEDOMETER $75.74 TOILER TESTING
''..._._ _106249 -Mi3N--T. STE-SURREY-CO--_._ $116.8 f.. .. ....._ --_.-.COOLS
l06242 NARK N. STCINVA NOEP 3936.72 EACRUP CLAIM
I Bf 2r1 STERLING APT lS6.T2 GRAPHIC SUPPLIES
1py2.0 a°11. �u^" 7.27 __.-_____�NDTOCRAPNif^38RYICAE ---..
'.` m lOET43 SUPP.IT STEEL 52,387.27 STEEL
'.' X 136244 SUPELCO. INC. 3218.2P LAS SUPPLIES
IDA246 CONTINENCYL AIR .�256.1
�-' 106247 CONTINENTAL PIP TOOL. INC. 312.156.14 TOOLS
106TN TAGG INK YAGGON M061LMOME PARK 1106.72 REFUND USER R8e OV¢9PAYM8NT
i-ID623$_ T ORPE INSULATION
116250 TIRE RE INSULATION $33.51 BUILDING MATERIAL
ti n 106250 TIME 4O710N TOOLS s]S.3I SMALL TOOLS
106253 TOTAL PREVENTION SYSTEMS $466.00 ELECTRIC PA SERVICES P1-27-1
106253 N.D. TRERICI CO. i206.78 ELECTRIC PARTS
-__TRUE• KER A UAR,SON, INC.
STR-PANTS-----..__.__.__..__..__._...
106255 J.G. TUCKER 3 SON, INC. ,913.60 SOIL TESTING
PART
1 u6236 TWIN INC• LAF OP ATOR ICS OF {5.313.60 SOIL TESTING 14-89
....___-1G625T-___-lE0SLY0YNi ANILC7-16AL-....._,..__-.__._._._. .__3173r1.1__.._._..._._._ . ._.. INSTRUMENT RePAIRPAI0. ._.. _.._. ... ._ _
1E6238 UNOCAL $240.61 UNLEADED GASOLINE
106259 UNITED ELECTRIC SUPPLY 539.14 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
i._.___106260. - UPJOHN HEALTHCARE
EACE63LEY1ARVICES 25.6!__-____._..JPRL¢LyNRVICEs_-___-_.... . .
106261 UPSO[V MEALY"CAT. SERVICES $125.00 CPR RMENINC
I OC 262 VMS [VISUAL "GAT. SYSTEMS) 35.664.AS INSTRUMENT
VWR S.CSESIING_--_.._____...._._______.. 666.OU--...._.__. _ . ..1'ESTIUPPLIESICBSTERS
106265 YVP SCIENTIFIC 92,566.46 LEE SUPPLIES
106265 YAd TIO NLAND 32.566.46 BEYOND S- PE! OVERPAYIE:NT
106266--- VAI. rr INSTRUMENT GY_60... ..... ._... .______.-34,124.33-__. ._-_._ _...INSlITTRUME_-
10C26T VEMIAN SYSTEMS
GROUP $5,235.31 INSTRUMENT PARTS
i. 1 RE7E8 VER ICN SYSTCNS 35.235.00 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
10RTEX INDUSTRIE.SUECLY-.____... ...___.__., ..--122.➢6......_.. -_._._.._. DOOR R
106271 JOAT EN INDUSTRIES 9533.52 DOUR REPAIR
106771 JOMN R. VAR LES i53].52 ODOR CONTROL CONSULTANT
i.
FUND NO 41-9 JT LIST WOP.NINC CAP17AL Ff OCESSINO DATE 4/Y4/9. PACE 7
NIFORI NUMBER AP43
------- ----.-- ^••�I F-StNIJ SJIUN-OZS7R-I Gib--OF ORANGE COUNTV---
CLAIRS FAIR 04/ll/94 POSTIN:. ORTC •4/11/90
--YaRRLYJJID ••e.NFMR •M:IL 4J--._____ _-DESCAlRT10N -._-__.
106272 CARL WARREN A CO. S426.116 INSURANCE CLAIMS AOMINISTYNR
---.--IC6274 -WESTERNSPACAB06.� --- --i6I.93_______
IC6275 WESTERN STATE C EQUIPMENT SUPPLY
CO. f761.08 CAUSTIC
S RENI'Al
146275 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPVLT fI8FE37.W CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-9-119
• 6276 WEROX CORP, EONA 4-B OR 6 COTTERALEAS -_
IL6277 •ERRS CORP. f7.679.22 COPIER LEASES
10A278 6COR 6E YAROLCY ASSOCIATES s569.57 VALVE
—IC6280 EVERA_L3ND`ORN CO •••••^ ^••R - 9?.-66 -_.-.ENGINMBUT_R6NTAL_.___.__—... ..- .__-
IC6280 RICHARD H. TORN CO. f497.1[ ENGINE PARTS
106281 P1Cx eP0 YOUNG PROD. f559.59 OFFICE SIIPPLI¢S
-- 10623 7LNDERSOM R 3.OD�1A-- -----_._. NSTRUCTIONJ-195---_____...
106283 R8INOEBBON CORP. $225,000.00 CONSTRUCTION J-19-2
------- TOTAL CLAIMS PAID i 2.923.910.90 ---._ _. -___- _--
SUMMARY ANOINT
T Ft OPER FUND i
F2 OPBR FUND 5.128.00
to 12 CAP FAC;FUND 2,962.58
}� 03_B .INtID
F3 CAP FAC FUND 626.50
35 OPER FIND 735.57
M 95 CAP-LAC FUND S O,�Y 20-_-
V I6 OPER FUND 226.00 --_- - -
06 CAP FAC FUND 4.71
IL OPER FOND LZ R9R A6
R7 CAP FAC FUND 3.229.94
_ III OPER FUND 4,319.12
f13 OVER FUXO
- %li OPER RRUND 20.53
_ F14 CAP FAC FUND 5,386.40
8566-CALFA£F110) ._2A.599.99
_ 1667 OPER FUND 2.274.67
07614 OPER FUND 2.035.92
JL_4F&s FUNK __564.y49.19
CORF 2,044,463.55
SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FUND 13,922.72
DIST MOWINcCAllin'FUND _. _212,846.24
f 2.923.910.90
FUND NO 4194 - JT DIST WORMING CJFIUL PROCESSING DATE 4119/9O PAGE I
REPORT NUM.NCR AP43
COUNTY SAI.ITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
-------- -- ---CCfTM'S"F4'Tll'tiTl23791r POSTE NG"D7TF'Ti'/23190"--- -'
WARRANT NO. VENDOR -_-__----AMOUNT -- _-- DESCRIPTION
1062-7 ACCESS ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS f438.25 LAS SUPPLIES
106298 GEORGE ADAMS JR. $7.844.15 BMA PANORAMA REIMB AGREEMENT _
_.__lOS R99-.--.-'Ati PENCE�OFFE'CE-3ERViC .Vn9E50.-'' .. __oirPIC6 UIPHENT
106300 STASIA ALLEN $64.26 KLUGE EXPENSE
106301 LEASING ASSOCIATES/ALLSTATL 41.293.32 - AUTOMOBILE LEASES _
-.-.--TOB302--ZiT•'ETT-3UP➢ET-ANFN7CF..—.-'-. --52.23.... - -__ P€T§TY SUPPLIEe
106303 AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY $1.752.62 FILM
106304 AMERITECH 197.75 COPIER LEASE _
_--_TOSS03--ANANCTI "EP-CONSTPUCTION_... �DT379:89._ ._.. SEL(ER'ESPAIR3 HE 2.7.14
10630E ARCO VALVE L PRIMER CORP 6180.08 VALVE
106307 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $2.115.55 NOTICES 6 ADS
_--1PGSDB-�fPFLY'RNE .�--_- --•-=Ti6T6:Pc_.___..__._ TEin1L1-RYA¢ V
106309 ARATCM SERVICES. INC. $3.90.35 UNIFORM RENTALS
- 10631D ARNCL DEVCLDPMCNT CO. 6535.27 REFUND PLAN CHECK 09BR DEPOSIT
---'I0f311 "A52➢CTATCO-CONCRE7ETR0➢:TZR ri39:40. '-. ___..____
_SUTLOYN�F4� .
,
- 106312 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING 1160.9C SOIL TESTING
106313 AREA - CORP. OF COASTAL AGENCY 1350.00 REGISTRATION^ -I➢G —STf ---FrELOF♦-DTSPOSTLCTPP SITr" fC27 ZTS RT.-._.___-- CRIf'0X6VU H.D.TP-95 -
ITTX 106315 F.W. BAPOTTI AND ASSOC. 55.58C.OL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PI-14-162.P2-37
106316 0. BATEMAN _-___1595 -
_ _ - DEFERRED COME DISTRIBUTION
-.T. 10SSS7---.V:A-BAUEREETR—.—_._. f290:'n.C__..___ _ - DEP533r REFDND
'a•CFS 106318 BARTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $2.602.16 LAB SUPPLIES
106319 HOWARD BLEVINS 1200.RD DEFERRED OTHERDISTRIBOn M
iDG320----FOTSE-Dl3 CiDE-OFFITF-F P'ODUCTS-"--- f57i.35'-'--""'----SfCE SUPPLIES
7; lA 106321 POLSA RADIATOR SERVICE 1143.13 RADIATOR REPAIR
M 106322 BON-A-RUES $126_26 TRUCK PARTS
-'M"`--1Df323--_.-.-RDYL'CTNG WEEP TA4-CORP— -. -_RM30.93 -._..�CITTEPJtN SERVICCES 7-11
106324 BRAGG CRANE 1 RIGGING CO. $762.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
166325 BRIM - MAR 1 11.225.54 REFUND PLAN CHECK OVER DEPOSIT _
__-�D'G32G--NERPTFTBRVNN-- ---8@POSYR-REFUND
106327 FROWN 4 CALDWELL CONSULTINE 53.273.90 ENGINEERING SERVICES US 89-45
106328- PURRS ENGINEERING CO. 61.498.90 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
_---106329-_—..Ts1151r"ANO-'ASSOCTATL3i INC.J."' .....__--_ __ST.43T.D0-.._._____.____SURVEVI0T I99VfUffjZi-fB-7 —
_
A06330 GARY G. STRECO f2.464.35 PETTY CASH REIMBURSO0IMT
1063.31 BY-PRODUCTS MANAGEMENT. INC. _ $30,419.24 FERIOUS CHLORIDE M.0.4-12-89
--TgW33Y--CPT-CORE:-/-SUNRTT'SOLUT70NT-""- —'--55i72£BT-- 5EROTDCAOREEMI
106333 CAL-GLASS FNP RESCARCM. INC. $1,111.02 LAB SUPPLIES
106334 C.LTAOL . INC. 43.154.61 REGULATOR PARTS
-
106336 CAROLLO-NOTLE.A JOINT VENTURE f1010.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES I-9
d
106337 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $34,666.31 SUMMERING SERVICES 3-15
7063 SP__-__CA3rP11YCP"L-E➢DIFXCNT.-.._-'. 153:1
106339 JOHN CASON $3.667.50 MECHANICAL PARTS
7. 106340 CENTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTLM $6.357.13 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
7--" 206S4T----ZENTRAC-FOEN7'S'OFTWARCTNC-'- --""'-" -"f75700 ------`- --' —SUBSCRIPTION
106342 CENTURY PAINT $781.28 PAINT SUPLIES
...__ _.. ._ ........._... ._.
w
FUND NO 9199 - JT UIS1 WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/19/9L PACE p
k FPOPT NUMBER AF43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ARANFL COUNTY
-fLA Ms JTAto ua/2T/46"-"PodrixG DATE .9%fB%93___
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
106343 CHALLENGE GEARING t IND• $FLY S63.73 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
106399 PENNY CMARTIER $250.00 DEPOSIT REFUND
1063TS—._-F11EVkONU.3.A.. INC_._ -
___ __ SI .ST2.9S.... . _ UNU6�nED GASOLINE
-" 106346 WILLIAM R. CLARNE 9619.54 DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF
-•'' 106347 C.I.E.S. • CO. . INC. _ $1.941.00 IdCtlAUIGL PARTS
1 B3 Ti6— --tOMIIN[$3lFA-CSRi 6FitT�'iS�iF-C4L IT' f26.319.65 POMP PARTS
106349 COMPUTER DRTACOM S922.21 PRINTER RIBBONS
106350 COMPUSERVE $21.56 COMPUTER SERVICES
106351-'—__._fONNFCI'G:IrPrARTB-7"DTV:'__. _SEF"9A9._. - TRUCK EART
-- 106352 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. $7.044.72 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
136353 CONTAINERIZLD CHEMICAL D13POSA $975.50 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL
_ __ BCuEPRIKTINC N.OT-11-89
10655E CONTROL CABLES. INC. $44.10 TRUCK PACTS
SCE356 COOPER INDUSTRIES. INC. 9129.083.02 ENGINES M.O. 5-13-87.6-8-89, J-19A
-- 106357- -'--'-LUSTY NESR I�DIN 4UPD CY - --'- -- '-- ---TSi2T9.19
.. 106359 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC f944.67 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
106359 CHEMPAD ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES S1.253.98 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
___wu-lf mT RkE
ITl 106361 LARRY CUPTI TRUCK L ECUIFMLNT f25.080.00 SLUDGE REMOVAL X.O.4-13-88
X 106362 STATE OF CALIF. DEPT. OF GEN. $99.CC PUBLICATION
:-�"--IO636S-- STATE"OF'-C7LIFDMNTA --& -GG:OS_
t 106364 STATE OF CALIFORNIA f16O.Cp BBC PROCESSING m
106365 STATE OF CALIFORNIA S255.11 DIRECT. USE I"
_TC60:O0._.....____ BSB'FROCESSINC PEF
106367 DAILY PILOT f43.50 NOTICES A ADS
Lw 106366 DANIELT TIRE SERVICE 52.091.92 TIMES
3-- 166369--.—OANTE-COA0RDCTFDff —___. EEET�-
106370 DESKTOP GRAPHICS L DESIGN S36.00 GRAPHICS SUPPLIES
106371 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $573.75 OUTSIDE PRINTING
SPACE RENTAL S-7T— -
106373 DUMB EDWARDS CORP. 9702.80 PAINT SUPPLIES
106374 OVALS SALES $357.9. !@LHAXICAL PARTS
_._..__.1Y�009:6E-.--__ . .
106376 ERA SERVICES. INC. $20.637.97 CONSULTING SERVICES P2-44
196377 ENSECO-CHL $3.700.40 OCEAN SAMPLING 106379 ECOANALYSIS. INC. S2.A1..17 eCEAN MONITORING
106380 ECOSYSTEMS ENGINELk2NC t Ak AL♦ .7.150.OS OCEAN RESEARCH
-151 . 2__-. _._ __ _. .._._ PUMP PARTS _
106382 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. f459.40 LAB SAMPLES
106303 MARSHALL FAIRRES 1 $350.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
._.....106389 --_-="-E-"tKCNSTE7M-s.F;- --_-CWSTRUCT7DNSERVTCE3T-7- .6-7=3if —_
106385 FDR SALES R SERVICE $2.332.99 FILTERS
106386 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. f293.00 AIR PREICXT
-^..-.-- IBG3NT'--"'"'F[PNELI GAT"--__._ _ _._. .._ .._._.______SST:f3. __..___--_ _._ ._-.PROPANE— — _
' 106368 FICO•S APPLIANCE SERVICE $207.12 VACUUM BELT
FUND NO 91P4 JT DIST WORKING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 4119/90 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
106309 MICHAEL J. FILECCIA 6162.63 DEFERRED COP PAYOFF
10639D FISCHER 6 PORTER CO. $2.466.97 FLOW METER
.__.__.._.101539I'----P SMER'IClTNTTPT V ` 3._.. . .- ...._.._.______.i" EtTPPLIES
206392 FLO•SYSTEMS 68.444.55 PUMP PARTS
106393 FLUID COMPONENTS. INC. $9.742.12 INSTRUMENT PARTS
_..--'--T S6'594--'---'YLbTG'TtNOLYWGSTSTCMS'..._.._.-.__._..._-__�T
106395 CLIFFORD A. FORNERT 1669.01 ENGINEERING SERVICES
106396 FOUNTAIN VOLLEY CAMERA $369.Tt F[LM
`-'-I46397-.i-YTTT"bP-F'OUNTNTN-9RTLT'F-.-v-'-.-.-_ "Z9-..__-_
106398 FOX ENTERPRISES $1,825.00 SAFETY CONSULTANT
106399 FOXBORO CO. / HAS SYSTEMS 364.01 MACHINE PART
_-_%va4lTC JAT*"FRf I1'C if- ._-_ _.-. .T .G7- _. -.-__---_ DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF
106A01 FREEWAY TRUCK PARTS $299.75 TRUCK PARTS
- 106402 A.F. FREY 1105.5U DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
206404 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $3.231.36 LUMBER
106405 CATE'S FIBERGLASS INSYALLLRS 35.418.75 FIBERGLASS WORK
_--'T0'E'446SAFLI-Y SUPPLIES
---G[NETtt-NYIt?T?AMS-S�[RVYO+r- --
-(_: X 1U6407 GENERAL TELEPHONE CP. $6.553.37 TELEPHONE
106408 GERHARD7•S. INC. i561.J1 INSTRUMENT PARTS
.;' -'2'06499—`-'-L'ttRLTCF•MITCHLCCTTNG-_._.__._. ._.__..__ .._.__. _-..-lF29T7T4':65.•_. _.____.. .__MCGIOTIcAE-PART
106420 GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION il.ROD.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
106411 SON GREEK L ASSOCIATES 34.507.50 SURVEYING SERVICES US 88-72
'10t4T MACHINE REPAIR
106413 HACH COMPANY i1S1.58 LAB SUPPLIES
106414 FRED A. HARPER 'I.995.51 pEFERRPA COMP DISTRIBBTION
'Va---10E'4T0 MAKE AGTON-INOOSTRTRT"1'L RST7C5—___.-_-�1_- .96___._--___-_V��PAlTS7Pi,FPIR
166416 HATCH A KIRK, INC. 1L.844.91 MECHANICAL PARTS
106437 HATFIELD DEVELOPMENT CO $2.667.92 REFUND PLAN CHECK OVER DEPOSIT
106419 PYLES S. HIGASMIRURA $4.59 MILEAGE EXPENSE
1 1i617V HIGH VOLTAGE ELECTF IC 6TDO.Pi ELECTRIC PARTS
-. .. 106421 -HIGH SENMAR"REGISTWITIOR— .-
106422 HOLRPIGER C.V.S. CALIF. . INC. 1653.81 COMPRESSOR PARTS
106423 DONALD D. MONDMICHL $300.04 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
--.-?06424 --TTOOP" CAMERA- R"---
RUIN LAMM .
106425 HOP170N HIGH-REACH 663.95 YRUCK PARTS
106426 P.S. HUGHFS CO.. INC. 12-0.59 PAINT SUPPL185
P6y.2T-----tITT'-OF-HUNTINGT HlRrAC Y---.__.-_..-__-_.-
106428 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STAMP 9111.56 RUBBER STAMPS
106429 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHWINN CYCL $101.84 BICYCLE PARTS
LIXIM
IB6431 [MERCY SEAVICES GP016 $129.67 ENGINE PARTS
106432 IMPERIAL VEST CHEMICAL tT5.249.70 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-08-89
•�-r--_. 108435- 1'NOUSTPY RL-IHRCYDCOTROOUCI3-� 7-
__M
106434 INFILCO UEGREMONT. INC. $47.897.00 BAR SCREENS SPEC 9-178
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4119/91 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMOCR AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS DF ORANGE COUNTY
S PITDff 01725F90'-'TRUMN GVATE"D WE r/ --
WARRANT NO. VENDOR ANOUNT _ DESCRIPTION
106433 INGRAM PAPER f2.734.16 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
106436 THE IRVINE CO. f3.974.0 "FUND PLAR (STOCK OVER DEPOSIT
—I0E13T--JRCKTCNATIO "f1 03._.____-._
106438 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP. 1
604.71 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
106459 JONN GTO NE SUPPLY .549.98 ntOTRIC SUPPLIES
--------------ST2T.9i_.._.
106441 NALLCEN.S COMPUTER SUPPLIES $729.93 OFFICE SUPPLIES
106442 KARAM BEARINGS f SUPPLY $36.54 BEARINGS
,Y 'EV6193' K3NEH"CUNPIYRV'---_--.—
106444 KARLEE COMPANY 9652.21 PAINT
106445 FLEET EQUIPMENT CORP. f19.650.95 ELECTRIC CARTS
OF AUUURS --- �273P'
106447 KAY-PAY, INC. $854.66 INSTRUMENT PARTS
106448 KEIIH-STEVCNS. INC. $3,077.92 ENGINEERING SERVICES
6P19— RNTN4TiN0--
106450 DONALD E. NINNE.Y $146.97 DEFERRED CORP DISTRIBUTION
206451 KNOK INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 1130.17 ____ GAUGE
m 10SASS MARTIN KORDICK, SP $2.�1365 3 r CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 14--IBA
>t 106454 MORNLANO BUILDING $837.56 REFUND PLAN CHECK OVER DEPOSIT
__-7� SDTLAE-cBecK oveR'UEeo3EI-
106456 LEIRMTON 6 ASSOC. S9.E71.01 LABB SERVICES
106457 LE ROY CRINDALL f ASSOC. f7.632.59 ClOTECUIICAL SERVICES
6VSR "TIFP.INI"CORPOR'ATTU�--_.---
106460 LINE TORQUE CORP. 14.406.23 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
W 106460 - K.P. LINOSTBOM. INC. f4.q P6.23 CONSULTING SERVICES - MASTER PLAN
n
-T06 V61 —JOEN-LTSt['PVNPT"THEY--____ f31i519.65... _—. PUMP PARTS-- ..
106462 LOCAL AGENCY $1.500.00 LAFCO PEE
X06463 LOCAL AGENCY 6753.0^ LAFCO PEE
YAK
106465 MRS fg4.41 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
106466 MAJOR LOCK SUPPLY 11399.50 SAFETY SUPPLIES
—_-TOE 9ET RRR'EIPm. Vhl="TUP7tiT--..
106468 PARSHALL HAIRY. PRODUCTIONS $191.00 INSTRUCTIONAL VIDEOS
ib 106469 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $11.22 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
— EV IrIIFC'C.-
106471 MCNCNNA ENGR. R EQUIP. $2,004.93 FREIGHT
106472 PCMASTLR-CARP SUPPLY CO. _ $1HI3.b4 HARDWARE
1064 74 MOTION' INOU STR IE S. INC. S2C3.48 MECHANICAL PARTS
106475 MOTOROLA. INC. f669.38 PACERS
____.10G4TS---KOMPOEitCCCURR'SENVTCCT..--_—_ -T50�"3'- -.—.—tEECpCpE-yylyPRpgE
106477 NATIONAL LUMBER f555.64 HARDWARE/LUMBER
IC6478 NATIONAL PLANT SEPVICLS, INC. 61.099.00 GENERAL INSPECTION
'Y069T9--190TTON61'TLCMNi CAl'TNFOR MATTON"'"'----"""--lIT7:5 C'_.._
106480 NATIONAL VISUAL SYSTEMS f917U7.63 PANELING
FUND MO 91P9 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FROCESSINC DATE 4/I4/9C {'AGE _
REPORT NUMBER 4*43
COUNTY .SANITATION DISTRICTS DF OPANCE COUNTY
_-- --- ---' --------- CCAIMS PAIU-V4725/SG-"-➢6STIRG DATE'P4/2579ti
WARRANT_NO. VENDOR AMOUNT _ DESCRIPTION
2064AI --- REAL SUPPLY CO. --'-- _—_- $81.66 HARDWARE
106482 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH S4.0P WATER UNEASE
_—_%I T:OC
106464 ERIC NIENUES 62.404.12 DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF
106465 N.C. NOTTINGMAM CO, INC. $693.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES - PUMPING
—^.._7HFiH�-7(DYF[L-STLErESUP('LTLi1—T Rt_...... _.. ___��63:75..._._ _ ..._.._stun _.
106487 O.M.S./SOLAG DISPOSAL CO S1.872.6f TBASU BIN REMOVAL
106486 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $298.94 SAFETY CLASSES
OFFTCTA1-1TNCINE-GO70EB-- "--'-'—'t2G6:06 _- SYBSCHIPSION
106496 DV SYSTEMS CO. 628.379.17 CHLORINE H.0.2-14-90
106491 CYNTHIA O-NEIL $36.4U MILEAGE EXPENSE
6 EXPENSE --
ID6493 ORANGE BEARING. INC. $255.55 FITTINGS
30(494 ORAWGE COAST ELECTRIC SUFPLY S147.76 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
_._-_.._.106495--.--OWi r-EODNTY- UTVPAATS_CD. .___
- 106496 ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING SERVICE SRS0.00 ROAD STRIPING
106497 ORANGE VALVE C FITTING CO. $514.63 i17TINGS
—�uA,9w--ORTGEv=RvTET _ -.. _ _-_ � 5:35__ .._._.___ -seeciAl.TY GASES
'm 1064.9 COUNTY Of ORANGE S1.875.11C WASTE HAULER SATE PEGS
106500 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $6,153.11 DEFERRED COME` DISTRIBUTION
706501--' --COUNTY-SRNITBTMrOTSTRTR -REIMBURSE WORXEA4 COMP INSURANCE
inU 186502 PC MAGAZINE 961.97 SUBSCRIPTION
-' 106503 PSI 6951.117 INSTRUIBNT REPAIR
[#— iOE5O9— __._TRIFTL'FLT(i5 _._.__._ _..-_.___.._ —__I9'i f22:T1�..._. _.- IffCW1NLCAL PARTS
'by 106505 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. 63.666.1: SAFETY SUPPLIES
- 1 196506 PACIFIC DELL 527.53 TELEPHONE
—106507—"—'➢AIRE'-v-RSSOC7BTES--"-- --CONNOZTIRC-PUBLIC RCLAYIONS MST
106505 PARS UNLIMITED S1.624.70 TRUCK PARTS
106509 ROY PENOENGRAFT $445.9f DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
.._..___ I4657V-_ _. ____�OTG�'SDONO'CR:-_--._.__ .._ _. . .._.__�__..4T7:78_._.__. . __ __.___PBSJEESUR R22A
106511 PICKWICK PAPER 1291.03 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
106S12 LIMA GNP SVSTEMS. IPC. $44,039.14 SLUDGE REMOVAL H.0.5-11-86
306513. __ FTTNR 'ROVES __..___ _. _ __. _.____SISA;5P. - ._..- PO6TAGELffiTER-RENTAL - -.
106S14 POLYPUPC. INC. $23.460.18 POLYMERS H.O.1-10-9D.8-9-89
106515 POWER CLECTRO SUPPLY CO. $982.76 ELECTRIC S@PLIES
STn.GZ --.- ICE
106517 PROCESS EQUIPMENT COPPANY 61.316.OP SEATS
10651E THE PROJECTS SOLUTION C:.. S4.028.00 INSTRUIBNTATION INSPEC710N M.0 8-IO.88
➢UHET SN..__.______ _._. - . .__ ...-__._SRS:9S- __. . . . .__..__._ 101ISCRIP1I09----
106520 R M CONTROLS $533.43 CHARTS
106521 P.P.N. ELECTRIC MOTORS 52.631.S4 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS
P6522---__ "T CSTSTE-DEVCEOFPCIIT' COFF. REMPLARCHECK-OVER-DEMBIT-_ --
IG6523 REF.YC. INC. 186.64G.UP SLUDGE REMOVAL H.0.5-11-88
106524 REP VALVE CO.. INC. 22.361.62 VALVE PARTS
__. . .. 1CG525-- VEP 1"NG-SHOES_._._. .._. ._ ._ __-..__ _ 64sv:. 9 ._ . .. _ ._.-- SAPETYSHOES
106526 REPUBLIC ENGINES $146.15 TRUCK PARTS
s
FUND NO 91P9 JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL RPOCESSINF DATE 4119/90 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMSC4 AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANF.L COUNTY
-CCAIMS'PAIO_09/2S/90'_P0'Sn WG" DATE
WARRANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT_ DESCRIPTION
106527 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. $926.95 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
166528 RFNOLD POWER TRANSMISSION ___- 394.32 _ _ , _ _ MECHANICAL PARTS
"' """-1➢6579- _- RICTIAl1w WATSDN-S 6ERSNOK SGTFO.4P LEGAL SERVICES N.0.6-11-86
106530 ROSERTS 6 SONS COAST. CO. $484.93 REFUND PLAN CEECK OVER DEPOSIT
104531 ROONEY-HUNT CO. $687.44 .. GATE PARTS
wOYLr_rNrr DRENT-__ SY'
S9.13-. --..- i3NrR6�i PARTS
106533 RYAN-KERCO $272.46 HARDWARE
106534 S.R.F. MACHINERY ENG.. INC. ...__..._.. _._-. $605.63 MECHANICAL PARTS
SETTTV=RCEEN"COR�_____._ 3152._9D_. ..__..-.. .PARYSZLFANEA-. __..
106536 SAFFEL 6 MC ADAM $409.20 REFUND PLAN CRECH OVER DEPOSIT
if ID6537 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT•L __. _ S28032.39 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-14-89
1065 3P---3EACLIPFC�EV ECaF MEhTTO. -�Sd'J-."0: -_ -" "'"'" REPUNU-PWT$XECII OVER DEPOSIT _
106539 SHAMROCK SUPPLY SI.J65.2f HARDWARE
T 10f540 SHEPHERD MACHINERY CO. _ $80.47 _ ENGINE PARTS
E➢IFON:ER6P:TNT:__.._ ....__.____._. -_-SY.TiI:[i.._..... ..___.ENGSNEERIN-MRVICS
106542 SKYPARN WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $940.00 PHYSICAL EXAMS
106543 SMITH-EMERY CO. 02.887.50 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-16-89
_.�_
.---'T 06F•�--SOTC-i RO_TCST7Nr ENV]NEE R3_.- _. .. 9 n . . .__ __.__.
SDIL TES IH.O.6-14-89
X 166545 SOUTH COAST DODGE 3245.65 TRUCK PARTS
1D6546 SOUIPCRN CALIF. EDISON CO. - __ _ - . 3391.123.73. POWER
,.� IC6547-.__.__...SOUTHERN PAY_COT-__..__. .9 E EAT-
py 106548 SOUTHERN PACIFIC TP ANSPOR. CO. s510.60 EASEMENT AGREEMENT 2-E6 ,
106549 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $47.25 DRINKING WATER
' '-- ""14655➢'-'_ -_`SPAFCING7NSTRUIT ENT . - ---__ - -'-3'2P2.7-u" -'-YNStkUFOFF REPAIR
;,by 10EE51 STAMEN 2. SPASSOFF. P.C. $7.200.60 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-162.P1-20.P2-17
1 104 552 UESTALLDY INC. -_ $2.117.91 WELDING SUPPLIES
106555_._--STEA-TOOC`8_S77PPCY CDT -�TsOS'6:73'_.__. . ._. TDOL3- .
106554 STATER BROS. MARKETS 36.695.E7 REFUND PLAN CRECK OVER DEPOSIT
106555 STERLING ART $76.99 GRAPHIC SUPPLIES
DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF
IC6557 SUSIA. INC. 1265.63 PRESENTATION AIDS
30058 SUN-BELT LANDSCAPC L NAINT. _ 03.847.C0 _ CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.8-9-89
_ _.
706559-____.SOII9ET FORD_____ R75 .__. IRUCK PART3-" .
I06560 SURE LCO. INC. SR33 A9 LAB SUPPLIES
A' 106061 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL. INC. i31032.3Y TOOLS
_-------1'D656E'--SORVCYOR'"ERVTCE-CO2-.......' .._. 3
106565 7ALIN TIFF, INC. 1253.84 TIRES
} _ 306564 TAYLOR-OUNN S799.22 TRUCK PARTS _
10656T -TECH N7CAL-PA OOUC TS"1 CTPLS'_ "-___ .'_______SSP6:/5 `""' MI.
106566 TEKKAR COMPANY $932.71 LAB SUPPLIES
106567 THORPE INSULATION ___ __ $504.12 BUILDING MATERIALS
._. ______._..__ __..
TIME OUTYPCNTTOOLS SNY 'Ell. SMALL TOT
106569 TIME M0 T30N TOOLS 363.39 SMALL TOOLS
i; 206570 TINKER A MASON f2.990.3P INSTRUMENT
__....-_.1 P 65T TRAVECTf AVE[
'- ..... .. ._ ..- VBL_SSRVICCS
106572 TRUCK 8 AUTO SUPPLY. INC. $234.59 TRUCK PARTS
FUND NO 12- - JT UIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/14/90 PAGE 7
REFORT NUMRER AF43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of ORANGE COUNTY
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
166573 J.G. TUCKER B SON, INC. $2,61F.34 INSTRUMENT REPAIR
166574 U.S. AUTO GLASS CENTEN.IY.C. S577.1F cL1SS
_......._...-T .—"UmwO lTGTltO. __._......._ _..._.... _-- f?24:60 .,..._____.__-SA _
106676 THE UNISOURCE CORP. f304.68 OFFICE SUPPLIES
106577 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $245.07 PARCEL SERVICES
__.-----_.i PeS'7R---11TR'AT�LLTV}TtR-CDMP}M'__._..---—_.._.._
306579 VWR SCIENTIFIC $3,322.11 LAB SUPPLIES
106580 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $9J445.07 FITTINGS
N' VWEN' PrTFR.r.—__....._._.... - _S1T6T 61.20 .- "-- --
306582 VARIAN INSTPUMENT GROUP f323.0R LAB SUPPLIES
106583 VERTEA SYSTEMS S2.697.50 COMPMR DATA SUPPORT
VTNTTIS'TND115'TRTIR�INPET.___.....__...._..___
LOSSES VILLAGE NURSERIES 928E.54 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
106546 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC t31R.E7 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
. ....---t065tT_—__._TRC"W4PMTNGTONZIIT—___._ __... _. �19':94. _._.._.._..__ �UVER'OB.A.
306586 CARL UARRr.N b CO. $301.00 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR
IOL589 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL $97.50 PUBLICATIM
m ICE592 WESTERN PACIFIC PRODUCTS. INC, .439.66 RENTAL SIGN
X 1Cl592 WESTERN PACIFIC EQUIPMENT Cl $1.139.E6 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
-�'.-..19 5 5 41----FLSTERro"5'TR'i[-CNERIT}C-SUPPLT_.__ ......._ -
��� 106594 WESTRUM INTERNATIONAL $1,132.57 TRUCK PARTS
' 106595 ROURKE L WOODRUFF 539.077.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.6-4-89
_
o 106597 RICHARD P. COGAN M-------
_$200 0b DEFERRED COWS DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL CLAIMS MAID 04/25/90 $1.660.364.26
r_zueszzzacczzzs
BNeMARY AMOUNT
'.... .. 14... ..- .—._...__.._....._....._._-_...__.................. ._.. .._._—_f.._.— 135.72 ._.. . .. ._ . .... .__._.__.
02 7,065.34
O2 5.706.39
•.SANS]_..___...___.._..
05 5.748.40
05 1,791.34
06 2,473.93
f7 34,794.06
., 011 6,749.59
014 28,456d36.1616
1566 271.45
_ --� ----- 271.45
0667 11.519.63
3.A2Qj4—
JT OPER FUND 946,387.45
._ CORP 354,973.08
.........,SELF_UNDBD WMEIRS..9"? INSURANCE
JT DIST NONI:INO CAPITAL L86.375.58
i L6fi8.3fiA.28 '•�
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127 a 10844 Ellis Avenue
of Orange County, California fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714)962-2411
JOINT BOARDS
AGENDA
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 13, 1990 - 7 : 30 P.M.
RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 4
A minute excerpt has been received as set forth below. Pursuant
to Regular Agenda Item No. 4, it is appropriate to receive and
file said excerpt:
DISTRICTS 3
(4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpt
from the City of Seal Beach re election of mayor and
appointment of alternate Director and seating a new member
of the Board: (*Mayor)
District Active Director Alternate Director
3 Edna Wilson* Frank Laszlo
(ADDITIONAL ITEMS LISTED ON PAGE 2)
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS - 6/13/90
The following items are hereby submitted o the Boar as o
Directors for discussion and action at the regular meeting
date and time set forth above. The need to take the
recommended action arose subsequent to the agenda being
posted on June 6, 1990.
In order for action to be taken on this item, the Boards
of Directors shall first determine by a two-thirds
vote of the Board members, or if less than two thirds of
the members are present, a unanimous vote of those members
present, that the need to take this action arose subsequent
to the agenda being posted. If the Supplemental Agenda
includes items for the Joint Boards and/or one or more
individual District Boards, each Director shall be called
only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for
each District represented unless a Director expresses a
desire to vote differently for any District.
(19) ALL DISTRICTS
0 e�i r s�iness and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any:
(a) Report of the General Counsel and consideration of
motion to receive and file General Counsel' s Memoranda
dated June 5, 1990 and June 13, 1990 (See attached
Memoranda) .
(b) Roll call vote authorizing consideration of items (c)
and (d) listed below which arose subsequent to the posting
of the agenda and which require action at this time.
(c) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and
Complaint to Foreclose Stop Notice and Against Payment
Bond, Laborers' Health and Welfare Fund for Southern
California, at al. vs. County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County, at al. , Orange County Municipal Court-West
Judicial District Case No. 162600, relative to a previous
Stop Notice filed in connection with Warehouse and
Maintenance Building and Oil Storage and Dispensing
Improvements, Job No. J-20; and authorize the Districts'
General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of
the Districts.
(d) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and
Complaint for Enforcement of Public Work Stop Notices;
Enforcement of Public Work Payment Bond, and Amendments
to said Complaint, The Burke Company vs. DSP Constructors,
Inc. , at al. , Orange County Superior Court Case
No. 625326, relative to a previous Stop Notice filed in
connection with Administration Building Addition, Job
No. J-7-4; anel authorize the Districts' General Counsel
to appear and defend the interests of the Districts.
\/
-2-
REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN
u JUNE 13, 1990
1) SCAQMD AWARD
I 'M PLEASED TO INFORM YOU THAT THE SANITATION DISTRICTS WERE
RECENTLY NAMED BY THE SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
TO RECEIVE A CLEAN AIR AWARD FOR OUR EFFORTS IN THE CATEGORY OF
MODEL COMMUNITY ACHIEVEMENTS.
A BOOKLET DESCRIBING THE AWARD ALONG WITH OTHERS GIVEN THIS
YEAR IS INCLUDED IN YOUR FOLDER TONIGHT.
PRESENTATION AND/OR ASK HANK WEDAA (THE ORANGE COUNTY LEAGUE
OF CITIES REPRESENTATIVE ON THE SCAQMD BOARD AND THE VICE
CHAIRMAN) IF HE WOULD LIKE TO SAY SOMETHING ABOUT THE AWARD.
2) UPCOMING MEETINGS
A. FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - THE FISCAL POLICY
COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY,
as
JUNE 20TH, AT 5:30 P.M.
B. DISTRICTS 3 & 11 SELECTION COMMITTEE - DISTRICTS 3
AND 11 SELECTION COMMITTEE ARE SCHEDULED TO MEET ON
THURSDAY, JUNE 21ST, AT 5:30 P.M.
u - ITEM 2 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE -
-1-
I .
C. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE IS
SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 27TH, AT
5:30 P.M.
(INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS TO ATTEND: )
LESLIE PONTIOUS
AND
CHARLES PUCKETT
- OR -
(SALLY ANNE SHERIDAN)
- OR -
(BOB SIEFEN)
D. CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE -
THE CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE IS
SCHEDULED TO MEET ON THURSDAY, JUNE 28TH, AT
5: 30 P.M.
- END OF REPORT -
-2-
MEETING DATE June 13, 1990 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7, 11 , 13 6 14
DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS u(s �15
(WWt) (b)LM)
(CRANK)........WAHNER...... (AGE)............. .......ARNOLD......�/—Y —v
(EDGAR)........PUCKETT.....�G _ _ (GREEN)........... .......BANNISTEH..._LG 1 7
(YOUNG)........GRISET......�G (WEDAA)...... ..... .......BIGOASER.... — —
(ROTH).........STANTON..... (NORBY)...... ............CATLIN...... L Y
(PLUMMER)................COX......... 1_
�l DISTRICT 2 (MAIN)...................CULVER...... ✓ V Y
(PL''K=TT)................EDGAR....... ✓ Y
(HUNTER).......PICKLER.....y _ _ IMAH.:.. ')................GRAHAM......,[ L Y
(SCOTT)........NEAL........ (CHES^_N)................GRIFFIN..... ✓�'_ Y
(WEDAA)........GiGGNCGA....1G _ _ (Ya-'G)..................GRISET...... . V Y
(NORBY)........CATL.N......1�_ _ (PLUMMER)................HART... ... . ✓ y Y
(YOUNG)........GRISET...... ., (GRAHAM).................MAHONEY:... . ✓ Y_ Y
(GRAHAM).......MAHONEY..... . ,_ _ (CULVER).................MAIN........ Y
(CULVER).......MAIN........�G_ _ (SILVA)..................MAYS........_ 6-
(WEDIN)........NELSON...... _ _ (SCOTT)............. NEALON....... I Y
(ECKENRODE)....NEWTON...... (WEDIN)... .........
.....NELS jl� q—
(SALDARINI)....SILZEL...... _ _ (ECKENRODEI..............NEWTON...... Y v
(BARRERA)......SMITH....... (HUNTER).................PICKLER..... _I— Y
(ROTH).........STANTON.....�C (HART)...................PLUMMER..... I Y
(MINER)..................POLIS....... Y Y
DISTRICT 3 (EDGAR)..................PONTIOUS...._1G _y_ Y
(EDGAR)..................PUCKETT..... V V
(MINER)........POL (STANTON)................ROTH........ . _V Y
(WILES) .. SIEFEN...... (COX)....................SANSONE.....JC Y
_ _ Y
(AGE)..........ARNOLD...... AGRAN)..................SHERIDAN..... Y
(GREEN)........BANNISTER... (WILES)..................SIEFEN...... 6L
,
(NORBY CATLIN... (SALDARINI)..............SILZ EL...... ✓ Y
(MAIN).........CULVER...... 1G _ _ (BARRERA)................SMITH....... Q,
(MAHONEY)......GRAHAM...... (ROTH)...................STANTON..... ✓ y
(CHESSEN)......GRIFFIN..... _ _ (MILLER).................SWAN........_K Y
(YOUNG)........GRISET......�C (NAMLSTROM)..............SYLVIA......�C Y
(SCOTT)........NEAL........ ✓ (ALLEN)................. ...... . ......._!G Y
(WEDIN)........NELSON......_ (CRANK/FERRYMAN/GREEN)...WAHNER......y/J_ Y
(HUNTER).......PICKLER.....yG (BIGONGER)........ .......NEDRA......
. Y Y
(ROTH).........STANTON...... (NELSON).................WEDIN......._
(WAHLSTROM)....SYLVIA...... . (LASZLO).................WILSON...... ✓ Y Y
(ALLEN)........VEIiYYGY....JG _ (GREEN)..................WINCHELL....,� V Y
(LASZLO).......WILSON......_.
DISTRICT 5
(PLUMMER)......HART........�G
(COX)..........SANSONE..... STAFF:
(STANTON)......ROTH........_. SYLVESTER... ✓
BROWN.......
DISTRICT 6 ANDERSON.... ,
CLAWSON..... ,
(HART).........PLUMMER..... DAWES........
(FERRYMAN).....WAHNER......J�_ HODGES......
(STANTON)......ROTH........�C_ KYLE........
LINDER......��
DISTRICT 7 NELSON......
NICHOLS..... ✓
(BARRERA)......SMITH....... 0- OOTEN.......
(PUCKETT)......EDGAR.......�G _ _ STREED......�
(PLUMMER)......COX.........�C _ _ VINCENT.....
(YOUNG)........GRISET......JC_ VON LANGEN _
(STANTON)......ROTH........� WINSOR......_
(AGRAN)........SHERIDAN....JG Q,�.yA.wa..RAMGdCu-
(GREEN)........WAHNER......_ OTHERS: WOODRUFF....ML
DISTRICT 11 IDE.........
ANWAR.......
(GREEN)........WINCHELL.... DEMIR......._
(SILVA)........MAYS........ — FLEMING....._
(ROTH).........STANTON..... HOHENER....._
HOUGH.......
DISTRICT 13 HOWARO......=
HUNT........ .
(BIGONGER).....WEDAA....... ✓ KNOPF........77
(NELSON).......WEDIN........ LINDSTROM..._
(HUNTER).......PICKLER..... ✓_ LYNCH......._
(STANTON)......RITH........ STONE......._
(BARRERA)......SMITH....... _ WASON......._
YOUNG.......
DISTRICT 14 � Bse�
(MILLER).......SWAN........
(AGRAN)........SHERIDAN....J� EYWMTRenAR.c
(EDGAR)........PONTIOUS...._��
(STANTON)......ROTH........ ✓ _
(BARRERA)......SMITH........a,
06/13/90
PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
JUNE 13, 1990 BOARD MEETING
NAME ORGANIZATION FIRM
Please Print Please Print
OC C /Pi1ZG�ti�� ii< I
°'VTGo E'ey
F31
6-13-90 JOINT MEETING NOTES
�..i
#4 - Receive 8 file minute excerpts
Director Edgar introduced new Director Leslie Pontious from Tustin who was
absent at the last meeting.
#6(a) - Report of the Joint Chairman
SEE ATTACHED REPORT.
RE SCAQMD award, Hank Wedaa addressed the Board. He noted that he had sat on
the Sanitation Districts' Board since 1971 and had seen a lot of positive things
happen. The law says we should do certain things and we think we should do
certain other things. Said his overall impression of the Districts is
exceedingly positive and he is very proud of the Districts.
As a Director at SCAQMD, he found that they were throwing rocks at a lot of
people, but then they established Clean Air Awards last year and agin this year.
He added that some time ago he came to the General Manager and said he thought
the Sanitation Districts should put together a package to apply for a Clean Air
Award. They only gave out 10 or 12 this year. He worked with the Districts a
little but they did most everything in preparing their application. Out of 65
submittals, the Sanitation Districts won one of two Model Community Achievement
awards. Called the Directors' attention to the SCAQMD brochure included in
their folders. He advised that this award was presented to the Joint Chairman
and General Manager at an awards dinner but wanted to present it again before
the Boards. He then read his presentation wording from the awards dinner (See
attached).
Following the presentation of the trophy, Joint Chairman Catlin commented that
this program took leadership and innovation and it was voluntary on the part of
the Sanitation Districts. The leadership is from the Directors and staff, and
we accept the award with pride.
Director Wedaa said there would be other awards next year and hoped Directors
would come to him with names of companies or agencies they would recommend for
awards.
#6(b) - Report of the General Manager
The General Manager briefly commented on the budget process for the benefit of
new Directors. Later, under agenda item #15 Directors will be considering the
Joint Works budgets for 1990-91. These budgets fund the construction and
operation of the treatment plants and administrative activities of the joint
Districts. The budgets have been developed over the past four months with the
Boards' Fiscal Policy Committee and reviewed with the Executive Committee last
month. If they are approved tonight, then the next step is that staff will
Incorporate these Joint Works items into the individual budgets of each District
that will come before the Executive Committee later this month, and then before
each District in July. The nine District budgets will then constitute the
official budgets of the individual Districts filed with the County Auditor in
August of this year.
A6(c) - Report of the General Counsel
The General Counsel commented that the tan sheet in the District 2 Directors'
folders was just an informational relative to a claim and litigation involving
Southern California Gas Company in connection with the construction of the Taft
Interceptor, Contract No. 2-6-2.
He then noted that there were two supplemental items for the Directors to
consider relative to a couple Summons and Complaints on Stop Notices previously
filed. These are routine and won't really cost the Districts anything. Will
be considered under agenda item #19.
R9 - ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR
(b) - Removed by Director Culver. He asked TMD about this change order to Job
No. J-7-4. Tam Dawes replied that there were four items that were changed.
This has been a problem project for the Sanitation Districts. Many of the
changes that we are experiencing are the result of what he would consider a poor
set of designs. We have had to make the changes to comply with the requirements
of the City and the needs of the District. We have talked with the General
Counsel about following up with a possible action against architect, but for
now, would recommend approval of this change order since these items are needed
for the completion of the building.
Director Culver said he and a number of Directors were under the impression that
normally the architect would have this information before submitting for
approval and permit from the City of Fountain Valley. The architect should be
liable for this.
Tam Dawes added that part of the difficulty with this project is that we didn't
get a lot of support from the architect. Did receive City of Fountain Valley
permits before work began but there have been changing requirements by the City
and fire sprinklers were required to be added because there are other new
buildings such as the lab and operations and maintenance building. The City
Fire Marshall wanted them all tied in.
Culver said, we agree, but if we submitted our plans, can't understand why the
City of Fountain Valley made this change. TMD replied that they feel it is
absolutely necessary.
Polis commented that there was a gross oversight in the plans when we have to
come back to change the heating system to add heat to Conference Room A. Would
like to see all payments stopped to architect or place a legal action against
them. Tom Dawes advised we have stopped payments to architect.
Pickier commented that he imagined this action would have to go through our
attorney.
It was then MOVED to approve this Change Order No. 17 and then go ahead and see
if we can get these funds back. Motion SECONDED. VOICE VOTE. MOTION CARRIED.
(n) - Removed by Supervisor Roth. The General Manager reported that recently we
have had considerable turnover in our Operations Department. We have been
trying to recruit for some of these positions. Have filled one. Had several
Interviews for the second one. Offered the position to two people. First one
turned it down. Second one comes to us with considerable experience in
treatment field. The staff has authority to employ up to mid-point of a salary
-2-
range which is below what applicant now makes for the City of LA. Are asking
for authority to employ him at the top step of that salary range.
It was then MOVED, SECONDED & DULY CARRIED to approve item (n).
(o) - Removed by Supervisor Roth. The General Manager explained that the Boards
have adopted separate policies for reimbursement to staff and Directors for
travel expenses. This is an annual authority placed on the June agenda each
year that basically authorizes the General Manager to send staff and Directors
to meetings that are deemed appropriate in conjunction with the other two
policies and in accordance with the budget.
Roth inquired about the cost of the meetings. Mr. Sylvester advised that the
Travel & Training budget is $175,000 out of a total budget of $5,000,000.
It was then MOVED & SECONDED to approve item (o). MOTION CARRIED.
#11 - Nominations for Joint Chairman
Director Griffin nominated Buck Catlin for Joint Chairman. Director Edgar noted
that nominations were to remain open until the July Board Meeting.
#14 - Report of Conservation. Reclamation and Reuse Committee
Director Wedaa referred to the package mailed with agenda material . He said the
Committee met last month and commented on their proposed types of activities.
He said so far they have gone through items 1, 2 and 4 on the list.
#15(b) (6) - Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for foul air treatment
optimization study
Supervisors Roth and Stanton stated their opposition to the motion.
Director Siefen asked why they opposed the motion. Roth explained that he has a
problem spending $85,000 to interpret the rules of AQMD. We should send the
rules back and ask them to interpret rather than pass this cost on to our
ratepayers. I object to this and think the responsibility to interpret rules
should be with the rulemaker.
It was then MOVED and SECONDED to approve Resolution No. 90-58.
Director Winchell spoke in favor of the motion and added that this agreement is
not solely for clarification of the rules. It is to find out the best use of
our own technology. We will be remaking the rule and setting the standards
ourselves. From this study we will be in control .
VOICE VOTE. Directors Roth, Stanton, Bannister & Polis voted no.
MOTION CARRIED.
#19(a) - Report of General Counsel re supplemental agenda items
The General Counsel reported that the Districts received two lawsuits where we
were named with the general contractor on two of our construction projects.
These are in connection with Stop Notices previously filed with the Districts.
He noted that we almost always get concurrence that we don't have to actively
participate in the lawsuit. If we advise that they will have to pay our General
Counsel ' s fees if we participate, they generally say to do nothing.
Item (b) , (c) & (d) were MOVED, SECONDED AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
-3-
R34 - DISTRICTS 3 8 11 re JCE Agreement for design of Contract 11-17
The General Manager reported that last July when the joint Master Plan was
adopted, the Boards also discussed the Master Plan for Districts 3 and 11. He
said this is a follow-up tonight.
Tom Dawes then reported that the issue they discussed last month was
construction of new sewage facilities to serve the northwest portion of the City
of Huntington Beach. The Slater Pump Station has to be upgraded. The Project
Report for this project was completed last month.
The issue that evening was to bring District 3 into the negotiations for design
of the Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements. The Districts
have been negotiating with Signal Bolsa for three years relative to annexation
charges that would bring them into the District. The Slater Pump Station would
have been designed to serve them (5,000 homes), but we have sent two registered
letters to them and they haven't responded.
Director Bannister commented in the last two or three days there has been some
disclosures that Signal may be taken over by Kohl. TMD said we had read the
articles also and intend to talk to Kohl . He added that staff hoped to bring a
design contract to the Board by the July meeting. Will meet with Kohl prior to
that. He said he suspected that this change is why Signal had backed out on
their previous commitment to the District.
If they do not annex, Tom said staff would recommend that the pump station not
be enlarged to serve them. They could bring lines to the Coast Trunk and be
served that way. It would cost them $10 million over and above what it would
cost to go into the Slater Pump Station system though.
Director Pickier asked what our alternatives were? TMD replied that we would
build a somewhat smaller pump station then. Would put in four pumps instead of
five. Would save about 10% on the pump station but there are some big savings
for District 11 by not having them. There is a line that can be eliminated in
the discharge system which would be a $2 million pipe.
Culver asked what the participation percentage was between Districts 3 and 11?
TMD replied 88.5% for District 11 and 17% for District 3 (doesn't add up ???).
He asked when the final decision had to be made? Ton said we would like to have
in July but could hold off 30 days. Pickier commented that he thought Kohl
should be brought into the picture. Tom agreed, we will do that.
Pickier then asked what the cost of the five pumps were versus four pumps? TMD
advised $7.6 million versus $7 million, less than 10% change. Pickier asked,
wouldn't it still be wise then to go ahead with the five pumps? Tom said we
would recommend against that. That difference may seem small, but to
District 11 it is huge.
Polis asked, what is the possibility of increasing it later then; making it
convertible? TMD replied it could be done, but the pump station would be a
little less effecient. It would take more energy. We do have adequate capacity
in the Coast Trunk. It would just be a bigger expense to Kohl.
Director Main asked, is the $2 million discharge line included in the
$7.6 million? TMD said, no, that is a future line.
Pickier commented that it seemed like it may be up to District 11.
-4-
The General Manager stated that the Directors need to keep in mind that if they
decide to build capacity in the pump station without a decision by the property
owners whether they are going to come in, you will be spending money out of your
own pockets that may never be paid back. That decision is down the line in July
or August.
Pickler asked if that additional capacity would never be used? Tom advised that
our 30-year Master Plan tells us it is never going to be needed.
Griffin commented, whatever the decision is here, should allow staff to proceed
ahead with engineer. TMD advised that tonight's decision would authorize
District 3 to be brought into the negotiations for design of the contract.
Griffin suggested that maybe they could look at the critical path timeframe at
the next Board meeting.
Pickler added that maybe the City of Huntington Beach can pressure them (Kohl)
to be sure we get an answer by the next month.
-5-
REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN
JUNE 13, 1990
1) SCAOMD AWARD
I 'M PLEASED TO INFORM YOU THAT THE SANITATION DISTRICTS WERE
RECENTLY NAMED BY THE SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
TO RECEIVE A CLEAN AIR AWARD FOR OUR EFFORTS IN THE CATEGORY OF
MODEL COMMUNITY ACHIEVEMENTS.
A BOOKLET DESCRIBING THE AWARD 'ALONG WITH OTHERS GIVEN THIS
YEAR IS INCLUDED IN YOUR FOLDER TONIGHT.
PRESENTATION AND/OR ASK HANK WEDAA (THE ORANGE COUNTY LEAGUE
OF CITIES REPRESENTATIVE ON THE SCAQMD BOARD AND THE VICE
CHAIRMAN) IF HE WOULD LIKE TO SAY SOMETHING ABOUT THE AWARD.
2) UPCOMING MEETINGS
eRw Ja
A. FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - THE FISCAL POLICY
COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY , (o
JUNE 20TH, AT 5:30 P.M.
B. DISTRICTS 3 d 11 SELECTION COMMITTEE - DISTRICTS 3
AND 11 SELECTION COMMITTEE ARE SCHEDULED TO MEET ON
THURSDAY, JUNE 21ST, AT 5:30 P.M.
ITEM 2 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE -
-1-
C. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE IS
SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY. JUNE 27TH, AT
5:30 P.M.
( INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS TO ATTEND: )
ESLIE PONTIO
CHARLES PUCKET
-
OR -
(SALLY ANNE SHERIDAN)
- OR -
(BOB SIEFEN)
D. CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE -
THE CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE IS
SCHEDULED TO MEET ON THURSDAY, JUNE 28TH, AT
5:30 P.M.
v
- END OF REPORT -
-2-
Hank Wedaa
Model Community Achievements -
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Now we've reached the important category of Model Community
Achievements. Our two awardees were selected for notable efforts that
result in healthier air for all of us to breathe. It's with great pride that I call
your attention to the accomplishments of the COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY.
In 1984,the Districts began installing launder valves in Orange County
sewage handling facilities, reducing hydrogen sulfide emissions by 48%.
The Districts are now constructing power facilities at treatment plants to
generate on-site electrical power from digester gas by 1992. This innovation
alone will reduce NOX and CO2 emissions by 57%. In addition, the Districts'
embarked on an air toxics study unparalleled in the waste water field. The
Sanitation Districts of Orange County have also been a driving force and
leader in establishing conformity review procedures to be used throughout
the industry. It is with great pleasure that I present them with this Clean Air
Award. Buck Catlin, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Wayne
Sylvester, Executive Director, will now accept for the Sanitation Districts.
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 3, 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
ON
JUNE 139 1990
PNITAT10*
o w9 g a
ORq 'GE CO t+`
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLia AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
`.r
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on June 13, 1990. at
7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance
and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for
Districts Nos. 1, 2. 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows:
�✓ ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO. 1: x James A. Wanner, Chairman Orma Crank
a Charles E. Puckett, Chairman pro tam —Richard S. Edgar
a Dan Grlset —Dan Young
x Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 2: x Iry Pickler, Chairman Fred Hunter
a James Neal, Chairman pro in —George Scott
Roland E. 31gonger 7--Henry W. Wedaa
a A.B. '-Buck" Catlin Chris Harty
a Dan Griset —_Dan Young
---Willi am 0. Mahoney _Bath Graham
x Robert H. Main Norman Culver
a Carrey Nelson _Wayne Wedin
a Arthur G. Newton _Norman Z. Eckenrode
z Wayne Silzel _Harold Saldarini
a Don E. Smith Fred Barrera
x Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 3: x Richard Polls, Chairman _Eva G. Miner
a J.R. -Bob- Siefen, Chairman pro tam _Dewey Wiles
a Margaret M. Arnold _Cecilia L. Age
a Wes Bannister Peter Green
z A.B. -Buck- Catlin —Chris Herby
x Norman Culver —_Robert H. Main
a Beth Graham _William 0. Mahoney
a Don R. Griffin _Donna L. Chessen
=Dan Griset Dan Young
a James Neal __George Scott
a Carrey Nelson _Wayne Wedin
alry Pickler _Fred Hunter
a Roger Stanton Don R. Roth
a Charles Sylvia —Robert Wahlstrom
—Paul Verellen a Edward L. Allen
x Edna Wilson Frank Laszlo
DISTRICT NO. 5: x Evelyn Hart, Chairman —John
Plummer
a Phil Sansone, Chairman pro tan John C. Cox, Jr.
x Don R. Rath _Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 6: x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chai man _Evelyn Hart
a James Wanner, Chai man pro tam James M. Ferryman
a Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 7: a Don E. Smith, Chairman _Fred Barrera
a Richard Edgar, Chairman pro tam _Charles E. Puckett
a John C. Cox, Jr. —Dan
Plunmer
a Dan Grlset Dan Young
a Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
a Sally Anne Sheridan Larry Agran
a James Wanner _Harry Green
DISTRICT NO. 11: x Grace Winchell, Chairman _Peter Green
a Tom Nays, Chairman pro tam Jim Silva
a Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 13: x Henry W. Medea, Chairman _Roland E. Bigonger
a Wayne Wedin, Chairman xo tan _Carrey Nelson
a Iry Pickler Fred Hunter
x Don R. Roth —Roger Stanton
a Don E. Smith Fred Barrera
DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chairman Darryl Miller
a Sally Anne Sheridan, Chairman pro tam _Larry Agran
7—Leslie A. Pontious Richard B. Edgar
a Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
=Don E. Smith Fred Barrera
-2-
O6/13/90
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager,
Rita J. Brown, Board Secretary, Blake
P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G.
Streed, Corinne Clawson, Ed Hodges,
Penny Kyle, John Linder, Charles
Nichols, Adriana Renescu
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel ,
Clark Ide, Walt Howard, Bill Knopf,
James Demir, Phil Stone, Tom
Richardson, Bernard Maniscalco
* Y Y * * Y # Y * Y Y * *
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file minute excer
from the City of Seal Beach re That the minute excerpt from the City .
Board appointments of Seal Beach re election of mayor
and appointment of alternate Director
and seating a new member of the Board, be, and is hereby, received and
ordered filed, as follows: (*Mayor)
District Active Director Alternate Director
3 Edna Wilson* Frank Laszlo
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman recognized
Presentation of CAQMD 199U ClFa_n Director/District 13 Chairman Henry
Air Award to UESD Wedaa, who is also a member of the
South Coast Air Quality Management
District (SCAQMD) Board and is currently its Vice Chairman. Mr. Wedaa
commented that he had been associated with the Sanitation Districts for many
years and that he was very proud of their accomplishments and their positive
approach to environmental management.
Representing the SCAQMD, he then briefly explained their Clean Air Awards
program which was first instituted in 1989. This year awards were given in
five categories. The Orange County Sanitation Districts' application was
one of 65 in the category of Model Community Achievements which recognizes
exceptional efforts in promoting good air quality. He noted that the
Sanitation Districts were the recipients of one of only two awards given in
this category for 1990.
Director Wedaa further reported on the accomplishments of the Districts
which resulted in achieving this Clean Air Award. In 1984 the Districts
began installing launder valves in Orange County sewage handling facilities,
reducing hydrogen sulfide emissions by 48%. The Districts are currently
constructing power facilities at treatment plants to generate on-site
electrical power from digester gas by 1992. This innovation alone will
reduce NOx and CO2 emissions by 57%. In addition, the Districts embarked on
an air toxics study unparalleled in the wastewater field. The Sanitation
Districts of Orange Countv have also been a driving force and leader in
establishing conformity review procedures to be used throughout the
industry.
-3-
06/13/90
Mr. Wedaa then presented the 1990 Clean Air Award to the Joint Chairman,
Buck Catlin, and General Manager, Wayne Sylvester. Joint Chairman Catlin
accepted the award on behalf of the Districts and expressed appreciation for
this recognition. He noted that the Districts voluntarily instituted these
air quality programs, and remarked that he was proud of the innovative
leadership of the Directors and staff.
ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Catlin reported that
Report of the Joint Chairman the Fiscal Policy Committee was
tentatively scheduled to meet on
Wednesday, June 20th, at 5:30 p.m. (This meeting was subsequently changed
to Friday, June 22nd, at 4:00 p.m.)
He also noted that the Selection Committee for Districts 3 and 11 was
scheduled to meet on Thursday, June 21st, at 5:30 p.m.
Chairman Catiin then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for
Wednesday, June 27th, at 5:30 p.m. , and invited Directors Leslie Pontious
and Charles Puckett to attend and participate in the discussions.
The Joint Chairman also advised that the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse
Committee was scheduled to meet on Thursday, June 28th, at 5:30 p.m.
ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager commented briefly
Report of the General Manager on the annual budget process for the
benefit of new Directors. He
explained that later in the agenda they would be asked to consider the Joint
Works budgets for 1990-91. These budgets fund the construction and
operation of the treatment plants and administrative activities of the joint
Districts. They have been developed over the past four months with the
Boards' Fiscal Policy Committee, and reviewed with the Executive Committee
last month. Mr. Sylvester advised that if they are approved that evening,
the staff will then incorporate these Joint Works items into the individual
budgets of each District to be reviewed by the Executive Committee later in
the month. Each District will considerits individual budget for 1990-91 at
the July Board meeting. The nine District budgets will then constitute the
official budgets of the Districts filed with the County Auditor in August of
this year.
ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel briefly commented
Report of the General Counsel on the report included in the
Directors' meeting folders on the
status of litigation against Southern California Gas Company for recovery of
additional costs incurred by District No. 2 as a result of undisclosed Gas
Company utilities encountered during construction of the Taft Interceptor,
Contract No. 2-6-2.
DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held May 9, 1990, the
Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held May 9, 1990, the
Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
-4-
Vol aai av
DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held May 9, 1990, the
Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held May 9, 1990, the
Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held May 9, 1990, the
Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or
Aooroval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held May 9, 1990, the
Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held May 9, 1990, the
Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes Of the
regular meeting held May 9, 1990, the
Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held May 9, 1990, the
Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratification of payment of Joint
antl Lnalvlaual District (;lalms That payment of Joint and individual
District claims set forth on pages
"A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized
below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts
so indicated.
5/09/90 5123/90
ALL DISTRICTS
JTbperating Fund - $ 399,974.42 $1,014,210.78
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 9,572,462.48 2,496,520.54
Joint Working Capital Fund - 384,149.04 179,126.23
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 12,417.85 119,862.03
DISTRICT NO. 1 - -0- 343.00
DISTRICT NO.2 - 628,461.28 1,269,102.58
DI TRI�CT=N - 16,975.22 73,910.10 '
DISTR�TTr_3 - 823,807.34 61,196.75
DI N - 1,175.25 257.21 _
DfSTUC H� - 398,653.76 382,589.43
I RI 1 _ 4 369_07 8, 38.
D .00
DI TR T - 451,350.10 6,290.41
TD�R Cf—NQS_._5 a 6 JOINT - 66,689.26 2,167.64
DISTRICTS N N - 2,045.60 -a-
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 8 NT - 9.14 769.40
TIT_
7 5T, 1 5.61T 44.53
-5-
06/13/90
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awarding Purchase o One 1
inductively ou led Plasma Emission That the bid tabulation and
ectrometer, ec f cat on recommendation re award of Purchase
`..� No. E-190, to Leco Corporation of One (1) Inductively Coupled Plasma
Emission Spectrometer, Specification
No. E-190, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the bid of Leeman Labs, Inc. be, and is hereby,
rejected as it does not meet the specifications; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Leto
Corporation for the delivered price of $122,000.00 plus sales tax for
Alternate Bid Item B.
ALL DISTRICTS In response to an inquiry relative to
A rovin ham a rder No. 7 to Change Order No. 17 to Job No. J-7-4,
the p ans and specifications for the Director of Engineering reported
Jab No. J-7-4 that these changes are for
corrections to the plans which should
have been included in the original design. He noted that although the
project was issued building permits, the Districts have encountered
considerable difficulty with the architectural design of this project.
Mr. Dawes indicated that staff and General Counsel are now reviewing
appropriate measures to resolve the issues. Changes to the fire alarm
system and sprinkling system required by the City of Fountain Valley Fire
Marshall were also discussed.
The Board members entered into a discussion concerning the architect' s
responsibilities and liability, and appropriate actions that should be
taken. The Boards' Building Committee has held one meeting on this matter
and will be meeting again in the near future to further review it.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 17 to the plans and specifications for Administration
Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4, authorizing an addition of $21,626.00 to
the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for four items of additional
work, be, and is hereby, approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That following further review and analysis of the matter,
the General Counsel and staff report back to the Directors on the issue.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 1 to the plans
Job No. J-17 and specifications for Central
Laboratory, Job No. J-17, authorizing
a net addition of $22,378.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation
for five items of additional work or deletions, and granting a time
extension of seven calendar days for completion of said changes, be, and is
hereby, approved.
r►
-6-
06/13/90
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 1 to
the electrical equipment purchase That Change Order No. 1 to the
contract with doper Industries, electrical equipment purchase
Job No. J-19A contract with Cooper Industries,
Energy Services Group, dba
C-B Reciprocating, for Purchase of Spark-Ignited Engines for Use in Central
Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19A, authorizing an additional
$10,000.00 to upgrade all eight engines with new computer controls,
increasing the contract amount from $20,658,245.00 to an amount not to
exceed $20,668,245.00; extending the date for delivery of the heat recovery
equipment from June 30, 1990 to September 1, 1990; and extending the date
for delivery of spare parts from June 4, 1990 to August 1, 1990, be, and is
hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Aooroving Cham e r r o. o the _
lans an s ecificateions for That Change Order No. 5 to the plans
Jab
NO. J-20 and specifications for Warehouse and
Maintenance Building and oil Storage
and Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20, authorizing a net addition of
$16,528.34 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for six items of
additional work or deletions, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing staff to issue Change
Order No. 1 to Purchase Order That staff be, and is hereby,
No. 37965 issued to Sur-Lite authorized to issue Change Order
Corporation re Job NO. J- 1A No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 37965
issued to Sur-Lite Corporation for
Purchase of Five Waste Digester Gas Flares, Job No. J-21A, decreasing the
number of waste gas flares purchased from five to four, and the total
authorized amount from $284,216.00 to $239,400.00, plus sales tax.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 29 to
the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 29 to the plans
Job Nos. PI-ZU and PS- 1 and specifications for Headworks
No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20,
and Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping
Cieanouts; and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31, authorizing
an addition of $130,821.95 to the contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. for 13
Items of miscellaneous modifications and additions, be, and is hereby,
approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
vi Approng Change rder No. 1 to e
laps and s ecifications for That Change Order No. 1 to the plans
Job NO. PI- 4-2 and specifications for Sludge
Handling Facilities at Reclamation
Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-2, authorizing an addition of $104,883.45 to the
contract with Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. , for
one item of additional work to accommodate Southern California Edison
Company and City of Huntington Beach improvements, be, and is hereby,
approved.
-7- �✓
06/13/90
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
pproying Change Order No. 2 to the
tans and s ecifications for That Change Order No. 2 to the plans
Job No. Pl-J4-Z and specification for Sludge Handling
Facilities at Reclamation Plant
No. 1, Job No. P1-34-2, authorizing an addition of $132,628.20 to the
contract with Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. , for
one item of additional work for compatibility with new Central Power
Generation Systems project, be, and 1s hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Anoroy ng Change Order No. 8 to the
fans and s ecifications for That Change Order No. 8 to the plans
Job No. P2- 7 and specifications for Miscellaneous
Modifications and Improvements to
Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-37, authorizing an addition
of $29,190.00 to the contract with Ziebarth & Alper for ten items of
additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the election ommittee
to ne otiate Addendum No. 3 to the That the Selection Committee be, and
Pro essional Services Agreement is hereby, authorized to negotiate
with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers Addendum No. 3 to the Professional
for desi n and construction services Services Agreement with Lee and Ro
re o o. Consulting Engineers for design and
construction services required for
Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant
No. 1, Job No. P1-33, to provide for additional construction support
services.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
AppraVing Professional erV ces
A reement with James M. Montgomery That the Selection Committee
Consulting Engineers, Inc. to certification of the final negotiated
conduct a study of user categories fee relative to the'Professional
for establishing rates for Services Agreement with
Districts' one-time connection fees James M. Montgomery Consulting
and annual use fees Engineers, Inc. to conduct a study of
user categories for establishing
rates for Districts' one-time connection fees and annual use fees, be, and
is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adapt Resolution
No. 90-54, approving said agreement with James M. Montgomery Consulting
Engineers, Inc. for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus
- overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a
total amount not to exceed $89,549.00. Said resolution, by reference
hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
-8-
06/13/90
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving en um No. 1 to the
Profess ono Services A reemen That the Selection Committee
wit Mar n ordic r. for certification of the final negotiated
specialized construction inspection fee relative to Addendum No. 1 to the
services re various master-planned Professional Services Agreement with
construction projects Martin Kordick, Sr. for specialized
construction inspection services re
various master-planned construction projects, providing for extension of
said agreement and increasing the hourly rate, be, and is hereby, received,
ordered filed and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution
No. 90-55, approving said Addendum No. 1 with Martin Kordick, Sr. , extending
said agreement for construction inspection services, on an as-needed basis,
for a two-year period beginning August 10, 1990, at the increased hourly
rate of $40.00 for the first year and $42.50 for the second year, plus _
mileage reimbursement for on-the-job travel. Said resolution, by reference
hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
e v ece f e n claim of
anue 'oan de That the claim of Emmanuel Ojo dated
April 30, 1990, in the amount of
$553.32 for alleged damage to his vehicle while parked on the perimeter road
next to the Santa Ana River at Plant No. 1, be, and is hereby, received,
ordered filed and denied; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the
Districts' General Counsel and liability claims administrator for
appropriate action.
ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that
Authorizing the General Manager to recently the Operations Division has
employ Dr. Y. J. hao in the experienced a considerable turnover
classification of Senior En ineer of senior engineering staff and has
at the salary of 53 month been recruiting to fill several
positions. The field of applicants
was narrowed to two for a Senior Engineer position. The first one declined
the position and the second one, Dr. Shao, comes highly qualified by virtue
of his schooling and 23 years of experience, 12 of which are in the
wastewater treatment field. Mr. Sylvester explained that he is currently
making more than staff is authorized to offer, which is the mid-point of the
salary range. He explained that staff is requesting authority to employ
Dr. Shao at the top step of the salary range for the classification of
Senior Engineer.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to employ
Dr. Y. J. Shao in the classification of Senior Engineer, at the salary or
$5377/month, to work in the Districts' Operations Division.
-9- �.✓
06/13/90
ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager explained that
Authorizing the General Manager to the Boards have previously adopted
desi nate members of the Boards separate policies for Directors and
antl or staff to attend and partici- staff for reimbursement of travel and
ate in mee in s, hearin s meeting expenses. Annually an item
conferences, facility inspect ons is placed on the agenda to authorize
and other functions him to designate members of the
Boards and/or staff to attend
m regulatory proceedings and other
similar functions. Such attendance is in accordance with the Districts'
adopted policies for travel and expense reimbursement and the approved
annual budget. He noted that the gross annual Joint Operating budget for
1990-91 of approximately $50 million includes a travel and meeting allowance
of $175,000.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to designate members
of the Boards and/or staff to attend and participate in meetings, hearings,
conferences facility inspections and other functions which, in his opinion,
will be of value to the Districts or affect the Districts' interests,
including, but not limited to, those conducted by state and federal
legislative and regulatory bodies and the California Association of
Sanitation Agencies, California Water Pollution Control Association,
Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, and the Water Pollution
Control Federation; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for travel , meals, lodging and incidental
expenses be, and is hereby, authorized in accordance with existing
Districts' policies and the approved annual budget for 1990-91.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Annual nomination for Chairman
of the Joint Administrative The General Counsel briefly reviewed
rganization - the provisions of the Districts'
Rules of Procedure relating to
nomination and election of the Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman.
This being the annual meeting fixed by the Boards at which nominations are
to be made for the office of Chairman of the Joint Administrative
Organization, the Secretary then declared the nominations open.
Director A. B. "Buck" Catlin was nominated as a candidate for the office of
Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization.
It was pointed out that nominations would remain open until the regular July
Board meeting. The Secretary then reported that the election would be held
at said July meeting in accordance with the Boards' Rules of Procedures for
the Conduct of Business of the Districts.
Nominations and election of a Vice Joint Chairman will also be held at the
regular July meeting.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and approve staff
Summary Financial Report for nine- That the staff Summary Financial
month period ending March 31, 1990 Report for nine-month period ending
March 31, 1990, be, and is hereby,
received, ordered filed and approved.
-10-
06/13/90
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re NPDES Ocean Monitoring
Program
Receive, file and approve Report Moved, seconded and duly carried: �.✓
and ecommendatian for N cean
Monitorinq Pro ram Year Six That the Report and Recommendation
1990-91 and Selection LOnInIttee for NPDES Ocean Monitoring Program
Certification re Amendment No. 7 Year Six (1990-91) and Selection
to A reement wi re Committee certification of the
pecif cat on No. negotiated fee for Amendment No. 7
to Agreement with Science
Applications International Corporation (SAIC) for Ocean Monitoring
Contract Services for Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall , Specification
No. S-032, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
A gravin Amendment No. 7 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: -
reemen w h A re
Specification No. S-032 That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 90-56,
approving Amendment No. 7 to the Agreement with SAIC for Ocean
Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-Inch Ocean Outfall ,
Specification No. S-032, extending the contract from July 1, 1990 to
June 30, 1991, for an amount not to exceed $1,821,365.00 for the sixth
year of said contract. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby
made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive Pile and a rove wr ten
re or 0 t e Conser% on That the written report of the
Reclamation and Reuse Committee Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse
Committee's meeting on May 31, 1990,
be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizino the General Mana er an
eneral Counse o negotiate wi That the General Manager and General
property owners for acquisition or Counsel be, and are hereby,
sites Tor water reclamation authorized to negotiate with property
facility in vicinity of Anaheim owners for acquisition of a site or
orebay sites for a water reclamation
facility in the general vicinity of
the Anaheim Forebay based upon appraisals for such property.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
ece ve file and a rave written
report of the xecutive omm tee That the written report of the Joint
and Fiscal Policy Committee meeting of the Executive Committee and _
the Fiscal Policy Committee held on
May 23, 1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
ece ve and fie Report of the
xecuut ve CTomnittee and Fiscal That the report and recommendations of
P0' c It r� 1 the Executive Committee and Fiscal
personne requ rements and joint Policy Committee re 1990-91 personnel
wars budgets requirements and Joint works operating
and construction budgets, be, and is
hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
-11-
06/13/90
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving 1990-91 personnel
requirements and amending That the 1990-91 personnel
Classification and compensation requirements be, and are hereby,
Resolution No. 79- 0, as amended approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereb ado t Resolution
No. 90-57, amending -Classification an ompensa ion eso u ion No. 79-20, as
amended, re 1990-91 personnel requirements. Said resolution, by reference
hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried by
Approving the 1 - 1 Joint the following roll call vote:
Operating Budget
AYES: Edward L. Allen, Margaret M. Arnold, Wes Bannister, A. B. "Buck"
Catlin, John C. Cox, Jr. , Norman E. Culver, Richard B. Edgar, Beth
Graham, Don R. Griffin, Dan Griset, Evelyn Hart, William D.
Mahoney, Robert H. Main, James Neal , Arthur G. Newton, Iry Pickler,
Ruthelyn Plummer, Richard T. Polis, Leslie A. Pontious, Charles E.
Puckett, Dan R. Roth, Sally Anne Sheridan, Wayne Silzel , Roger R.
Stanton, Peer A. Swan, Charles E. Sylvia, James A. Wahner, Henry
W. Wedaa, Edna Wilson, Grace H. Winchell
NOES: None
ABSENT: Tom Mays, Carrey J. Nelson, J. R. "Bob" Siefen, Don E. Smith,
Wayne D. Wedin
That the proposed 1990-91 Joint Operating Budget Funds of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 for the 1990-91 fiscal year,
be, and are hereby, approved and adopted as follows:
Fund Total Amount
Joint Operating/Working Capital $50,2079000
Workers' Compensation Self-Insured 218,000
Self-Funded Health Plan Trust 1,264,000
Public Liability Self-Insured 329,000
�./ -12-
O6/13/90
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried by
A rovin the 1 - 1 Capital the following roll call vote:
Outlay Revolving un Budget
AYES: Edward L. Allen, Margaret M. Arnold, Wes Bannister, A. B. "Buck"
Catlin, John C. Cox, Jr. , Norman E. Culver, Richard B. Edgar, Beth
Graham, Don R. Griffin, Dan Griset, Evelyn Hart, William D.
Mahoney, Robert H. Main, James Neal , Arthur G. Newton, Iry Plckler,
Ruthelyn Plummer, Richard T. Polis, Leslie A. Pontious, Charles E.
Puckett, Don R. Roth, Sally Anne Sheridan, Wayne Silzel , Roger R.
Stanton, Peer A. Swan, Charles E. Sylvia, James A. Wahner, Henry
W. Wedaa, Edna Wilson, Grace H. Winchell
NOES: None
ABSENT: Tom Mays, Carrey J. Nelson, J. R. "Bob" Siefen, Don E. Smith,
Wayne D. Wedin
That the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget (CORF Joint Works
Construction) of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13
and 14, be, and is hereby, approved and adopted in the total amount of
$103,422,000.00.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the Fiscal Policy
Committee to evaluate proposals That the Fiscal Policy Committee be,
and to place Excess Workers' and is hereby, authorized and directed
Com ensation insurance coverage to evaluate.proposals obtained by the
effec ve u y 1, 1 Districts' insurance broker and to
place Excess Workers' Compensation
insurance coverage effective July 1, 1990; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said action shall be submitted to the Joint Boards for
ratification or revision at the regular meeting on July 11, 1990.
ALL DISTRICTS Supervisor Roth and Supervisor
Approving Professional services Stanton expressed their opposition to
Agreement with John Carollo the proposal to engage a consultant
En ineers to conduct a foul air to conduct a foul air treatment
treatment optimization study optimization study. In response to
an inquiry from other Directors about
the reason for his opposition, Supervisor Roth stated that he was opposed to
spending this money for a consultant to interpret South Coast Air Quality
Management District rules. He stated his belief that the rulemakers should
interpret their own rules rather than passing the costs on to the Districts'
ratepayers.
Director Winchell then spoke in favor of the proposal stating that the
agreement with John Carollo Engi:ieers was not solely for clarification of
SCAQMD rules, but to determine the best use of the Districts' technology and
to establish the standards to be used in the future for these rules and
operational activities.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
-13- �/
06/13/90
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-58, approving
Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers to conduct a
foul air treatment optimization study, on an hourly-rate basis for labor
plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit,
for a total amount not to exceed $85,000.00. Said resolution, by reference
hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
Directors Wes Bannister, Richard T. Polis, Don R. Roth. Wayne Silzel and
Roger R. Stanton asked that their votes in opposition to the motion be made
a matter of record.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizin t e Dec or o nance
to cer 1fy claims airnd torwaro to That the Director of Finance be, and
County Auditor for payment is hereby, authorized to certify
claims and forward to the Orange
County auditor for immediate payment for expenditures incurred after
June 30, 1990, and that he declare that such certification shall comply with
the provisions of Resolution No. 76-10 pertaining to procedures for payment
of claims against the Districts until the 1990-91 budgets are adopted by the
respective Districts.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive file an a rove ro osal
0 onnenschein, Na
th 8 Rosentha , That the proposal of Sonnenschein,
Attorneys At Law re continuation of Nath & Rosenthal , Attorneys At Law,
services of Mr. Lee Paterson, Esq. dated June 6, 1990, for continuation
of services of Mr. Lee Paterson,
Esq. , now associated with said firm, as special labor counsel for the
Districts, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re Supplemental Agenda
items relative to Summons and
omplaints received subsequent to
the a enda bein ooted re Job
Nos. J- -4 and -
Verbal report of General Counsel The General Counsel reported that
the Districts had been served
with two Summons and Complaints, subsequent to the agenda being posted,
involving subcontractors who had filed Stop Notices against the
Districts' general contractor, J. R. Roberts Corp. , in connection with
Administration Building Addition, Jab No. J-7-4, and Warehouse and
Maintenance Building and Oil Storange and Dispensing Improvements, Job
No. J-20. Because he was required to respond to said lawsuits prior to
the July Board meeting, the General Counsel advised that it would be
necessary for the Boards to consider these matters that evening.
Mr. Woodruff noted that while the Districts are named in these cases,
he would endeavor to not actively participate and, if need be, will
simply deposit the funds retained by the Districts' from the
Contractor's progress payments into court to allow the contractor and
the claimants to resolve their disputes.
-14-
06/13/90
The General Counsel pointed out that because these proposed
Supplemental Agenda items were unable to be posted 72 hours prior to
the meeting, the Boards must vote on whether the matter should be .—
considered prior to actually voting on the recommended actions. He
noted that the decision by the Boards to consider these matters must be
approved by a two-thirds vote of those present.
Authorizinq consideration of Moved, seconded and unanimously
upplemental Agenda items relative tarried:
to receiving and filing Summons and
Com Taints--The Burke Com any
n vs. That the Boards of Directors do
D P constructors, Inc. et al. , hereby authorize consideration of
Case No. 625 re Job Na. -7-4, supplemental agenda items
and Laborers ealth and Welfare relative to a Summons and
Fund for Southern California vs. complaint for Enforcement of
C OOC at al . Case No. 162600, re Public Work Stop Notices;
Job No. J_ZU Enforcement of Public Work
Payment Bond, and Amendments to
said Complaint, The Burke Company vs. DSP Constructors, Inc. , at al . ,
Orange County Superior Court Case No. 625326, relative to a previous
Stop Notice filed in connection with Administration Building Addition,
Job No. J-74; and a Summons and Complaint to Foreclose Stop Notice and
Against Payment Bond, Laborers' Health and Welfare Fund for Southern
California, et al . vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, et
al. , Orange County Municipal Court-West Judicial District Case
No. 162600, relative to a previous Stop Notice filed in connection with
Warehouse and Maintenance Building and Oil Storage and Dispensing
Improvements, Job No. J-20, which were not posted 72 hours prior to the
Board meeting date because the need to take said actions arose
subsequent to the agenda being posted; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the General Counsel 's Memoranda relative to said
Supplemental Agenda items, dated June 5, 1990 and June 13, 1990, be,
and are hereby, received and ordered filed.
Receive and file Summons and Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Complaint for Enforcement of Public
Work Stop Notices; Enforcement of That the Summons and Complaint
Public Work Payment Bond, and for Enforcement of Public Work
Amendments to said Complaint The Stop Notices; Enforcement of
Burke Lompany vs. DSP Constructors, Public Work Payment Bond, and
Inc. , at al . Orange aunt u erior Amendments to said Complaint, The
Court Case No. 62532 , re Stop Burke Company vs. DSP
Notice filed on Job No. J-7-4 Constructors, Inc. , et al . ,
Orange County Superior Court Case
No. 625326, relative to a previous Stop Notice filed in connection with
Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4, be, and are hereby,
received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby,
authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts.
-15-
O6/13/90
Receive and file Summons and Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Complaint to Foreclose Stop Notice
and a nst Payment Bond a ofi rersl That the Summons and Complaint to
`../ Heaitn ano Welfare Fund for Southern Foreclose Stop Notice and Against
California, et al . vs. Coun y Payment Bond, Laborers' Health
Sanitation Districts of orange and Welfare Fund for Southern
County, et al . , urange uo=4California, et al. vs. County
Munici al Court-West Judi calSanitation Districts of Orange
District ase No. 1926501 re Sto county, et al. , range oun y
Notice filed on Job No. J- Municipal Court-West Judicial
District Case No. 162600,
relative to a previous Stop Notice filed in connection with Warehouse
and Maintenance Building and Oil Storage and Dispensing Improvements,
Job No. J-20, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby,
` authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m., June 13, 1990.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 7 to the
tans and s ecifications for That Change Order No. 7 to the plans
ontract Nos. an and specifications for Portion of
Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between
Edinger Avenue and Lampson Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2, and South Anaheim
Relief Sewer, on Ball Road between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract
No. 2-27, authorizing an addition of $56,773.00 to the contract with
W. H. Ebert Corp. for nine items of additional work and granting a time
extension of 12 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be,
and is hereby, approved.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 8 to the
Tans and s ecifications for That Change Order No. 8 to the plans
Contract Nos. 2-2 - and 2-41 and specifications for Portion of
Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between
Edinger Avenue and Lampson Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2, and South Anaheim
Relief Sewer, on Ball Road between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract
No. 2-27, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a net
addition of $270,519.30 to the contract with W. H. Ebert Corp.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Accepting ontract No. 2-26-2 and
Contract No. 2-27 as complete That the Board of Directors hereby
adopts Resolution No. 90-59-2,
accepting Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and
Lampson Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2, and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball
Road between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27, as
complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving
Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby
�.../ made a part of these minutes.
-I6-
06/13/90
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving lans and s eciP ca tons
for contract Nos. -26-3, 2-28 and That the Board of Directors hereby
2-ff adopts Resolution No. 90-60-2,
approving plans and specifications
for Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, Between Broadway and Orangethorpe
Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-3; Katella Relief Sewer, Between Euclid Street and
Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-28; and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract
No. 2-29 (and City of Anaheim Street Improvements), and authorizing the
General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution,
by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
A rovin A reemen w Kraemer
Im ertal Associates re acce ante That the Board of Directors hereby
of new urant of Easement in adopts Resolution No. 90-61-2,
connec on with real i ned ortion approving Agreement with Kraemer
of Contract No. - 2- A and Imperial Associates relative to
author z n execution of a acceptance of new Grant of Easement
Corporation ui tclaim Deed in connection with a realigned
portion of the Cypress Avenue
Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9 (Realignment entitled Contract No. 2-9A);
and approving and authorizing execution of a Corporation Quitclaim Deed,
quitclaiming the District's interest in a portion of the original sewer line
and easement therefor from Kraemer Imperial Associates. Said resolution, by
reference hereto, 1s hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing General Counsel to file
a com aint in the Munici al Burt That the General Counsel be, and is
to seek recover of un a sewer hereby, authorized to file a
connection Tees trom tsenco complaint in the Municipal Court
Development seeking recovery of unpaid sewer
connection fees in the amount of
$7,038.00 from Benco Development.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing General ounse to file
a complaint in the Municipal our That the General Counsel be, and is
to seek recovery OT unpaid sewer hereby, authorized to file a
connection fees from Bristol Lane complaint to the Municipal Court
Associates seeking recovery of unpaid sewer
connection fees in the amount of
$11,593.81 from Bristol Lane Associates.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman ,
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m. , June 13, 1990.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
' r`ovIn g Addendum o. 1 to the
plans an spec Pications Tor That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and
contract No. -35-1 specifications for South Coast Trunk
Sewer, Phase I, Contract No. 5-35-1,
making miscellaneous technical and traffic control clarifications, be, and
is hereby, approved.
-17-
06/13/90
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
war Contract o. o
W. MarcCorp. That the Board of Directors hereby
adopts Resolution No. 90-64-5,
�./ receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract
for South Coast Trunk Sewer, Phase I, Contract No. 5-35-1, to W. H. Ebert
Corp. in the total amount of $880,066.00. Said resolution, by reference
hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
A rovin Memorandum a nders an n
w th a ry ne ompany re Contract That the Memorandum of Understanding
No. 5-34-3 with The Irvine Company re
construction of Improvements to
Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-34-3, be, and is hereby, approved;
and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Chairman and Secretary be, and are hereby,
authorized to sign said Memorandum of Understanding in form approved by the
General Counsel.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m., June 13, 1990.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
AdJournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. .6 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m., June 13, 1990.
DISTRICTS 7 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive f e an den amended
claim of pu ern a fornia d son That the amended claim of Southern
Company re Contract No. 14-1-18 California Edison Company dated
May 18, 1990 (original claim in an
estimated amount dated 4/13/90 never received and filed) in the amount of
$4,328.74 for alleged damages to a 12,000 volt line incurred during
construction of Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview
Road (and City of Costa Mesa street improvements), Contract No. 14-1-18, be,
and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the
Districts' General Counsel , liability claims administrator, contractor and
contractor's insurance company for appropriate action.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Tu—thorizing initiation o
roceedin s re ro ose Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby
o. 1 ams Annexation adopts Resolution No. 90-65-7,
authorizing initiation of proceedings
to annex 2.50 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the
southeast corner of the intersection of Leman Heights Drive and Lower Lake
Drive in unincorporated County territory (proposed Annexation No. 135 -
�.,� Williams Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). Said resolution,
by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
-18-
06/13/90
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
AdJournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m. , June 13, 1990.
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m. , June 13, 1990.
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m. , June 13, 1990.
DISTRICT 3
c ons ursuant to the Boards
re eve o en a enc tax increment
8olicy re Cypress Kedevelo men
enc Los Alamitos Race rack an
olf uours2 ede opment ro ec
and the Lincoln Revedevelopment
Project
Receive and file letter from GRC Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Redevelopment onsU an s, Inc.
That the letter from GRC
Redevelopment Consultants, Inc. dated April 11, 1990 proposing a
pass-through of historical , proportional annual tax increment to
District re Los Alamitos Race Track and Golf Course Redevelopment
Project, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
A rovin A reement with C ress Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Redeve o mant A enc re Los Alamitos
Race Track and Goltourse That the Board of Directors
Redevelopment Project hereby adopts Resolution
No. 90-62-3, approving Agreement
with Cypress Redevelopment Agency, re pass-through of historical ,
proportional annual tax increment to District relative to the
Los Alamitos Race Track and Golf Course Redevelopment Project. Said
resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
Electing a tax increment pass- Moved, seconded and duly carried:
throw h re Lincoln Avenue
Redevelopment Project That the Board of Directors
hereby adopts Resolution
No. 90-63-3, electing a tax increment pass-through, pursuant to Section
33676 of the Health and Safety Code, relative to the Lincoln Avenue
Redeve3opment Project. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby
made a part of these minutes.
-19-
06/13/90
DISTRICTS 3 & 11
Actions re Addendum o. I to e
Professional 5ervim A reent
with John arollo Engi em
neers for
preparation of Project Report re
Contract No. 11-17 to rovide for
esign and construction services
Verbal report of staff The Director of Engineering
reported that at the May Board
meeting Directors approved a Project Report relative to Slater Avenue
Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17. Said
improvements were included in the Districts' new 1989 30-year Master
Plan. The Master Plan also identified the needed improvements as a
joint project to serve portions of Districts 3 and 11 and would realize
considerable savings to both Districts over the old master-planned
system.
In May the Boards also approved an agreement between the two Districts
providing for financing, design, construction, capacity ownership
(based on flows) and operation of certain master-planned sewage
collection facilities serving Districts 3 and 11, including the Slater
Avenue Pump Station system.
Mr. Dawes advised that included within the drainage area originally
anticipated to be served by the Slater Avenue Pump Station is
1,608 acres of land south of Los Patos Avenue and southeasterly of
Warner Avenue, generally known as the Bolsa Chica area. In April 1987
the Directors of District 11 authorized the staff and General Counsel
to negotiate an annexation agreement with the property owners. The
Signal Bolsa Corporation is the principal landowner and the Board's
action was pursuant to Signal Bolsa's request. The Bolsa Chica area is
presently outside the boundary of District 11 but within its sphere of
influence. Signal Bolsa principals and counsel and Districts' staff
and counsel have met numerous times over the past several years in an
attempt to come to a pre-annexation agreement. However, Signal Bolsa
Corporation is not yet ready to annex and recently advised staff that
they are no longer willing to proceed with the proposed pre-annexation
agreement. The last draft of the proposed agreement provided for the
annexation of the Bolsa Chica area and prepayment of fees for those
areas to be developed by Signal Bolsa to provide the necessary funding
for construction of capacity in the Slater Pump Station system to serve
the Bolsa Chica area if, and when, it is annexed.
Because of the urgent need to proceed with design and construction of
the facilities, staff reported that two letters were sent to Signal
Bolsa advising them that they must make a decision by May 16, 1990 on
the pre-annexation agreement, and that without such an agreement, the
Districts could provide no assurances that the area could be annexed or
sewage service provided by the Districts in the future. Mr. Dawes
reported that to date, Signal Bolsa had not responded to the Districts'
letters.
ub/W/Vu
Staff noted that at the May Board meeting, it was the consensus of the
Directors that unless a pre-annexation agreement was executed by Bolsa
Chica property owners, capacity to serve the area should not be
included in the Districts' Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System.
Accordingly, staff recommended that that the Boards proceed with
negotiations for design and construction of this system. Mr. Dawes
advised that a final decision on the capacity of the pump station would
need to be made at the time the design contract is awarded, probably in
July or August.
Directors then commented on recent events indicating that The Koll
Company may be replacing Signal Bolsa Corporation as the major
developer of Bolsa Chica. Staff advised that they were aware of this
and had been trying to contact officials at Koll regarding the Bolsa
Chico annexation issue.
Staff and Directors then entered into a lengthy discussion regarding
issues discussed at the May Board meeting relative to whether or not
the Slater Avenue Pump Station should be sized to provide capacity for
the Bolsa Chica area without a pre-annexation agreement, which would
require the rate-payers in Districts 3 and 11 to front the costs
without any assurance that they would be recovered in the future. It
was once again pointed out that if capacity for Bolsa Chica is not
included in the Slater Pump Station system, Signal Bolsa (or The Koll
Company) would have to construct its own sewer lines through the Bolsa
Chica area and tie into the Districts' Coast Trunk Sewer at a cost that
would be substantially higher than putting up the money now for
capacity to the Slater Avenue Pump Station sewage system.
Staff also reviewed the alternative Slater System capacities, costs and
relative share between Districts 3 and 11 and without Bolsa Chica.
Staff reported that although the increase in costs to build the upsized
pump station to provide capacity for the Bolsa Chica area may seem
relatively small , it would be a substantial burden to District 11
without the prepayment of annexation fees by Signal Bolsa. Mr. Dawes
further pointed out that if capacity for Bolsa Chica is not included in
the Slater Avenue Pump Station system, District 11 would realize
additional savings in the future because the need for a proposed
$2 million conveyance sewer would be eliminated.
Mr. Dawes reiterated that staff would attempt to meet with The Koll
Company prior to asking the Directors to make a decision on the
proposed capacity of the Slater Avenue Pump Station system. He
indicated staff would report back to them at the July or August Board
meeting with further information.
Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Staff Report dated June 5, 1990 re Slater Avenue Pump Station
Sewage System Improvements, be, and is hereby, received and ordered
filed.
Authorizlian the Se o.lection Cormittee Moved, seconded and duly carried: -
to negotte Adden um N1 _
That the Selection Committee be,
and is hereby, authorize" to solicit a proposal and negotiate Addendum
No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carolio
Engineers for preparation of Phase I Preliminary Project Report for
Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract
No. 11-17, to provide for preparation of plans and specifications and
construction support services.
-21-
06/13/90
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
]ournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:29 p.m., June 13, 1990.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:29 p.m. , June 13, 1990.
Secretary of the Boards of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14
`./ -22-
FUND 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING 'DATE 5/02/91 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY.
( CLAIMS PAID 05/09/90 POSTING DATE 05/39/90
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
f 106622 ABBE COMPANY/INAGEN CORP. $212.19 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
106623 AT 6 1 $420.43 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICE
106624 SCHILTKNECHT MESSTECHNIK AG $604.00 METER REPAIR
i 106625 LINCOLN CARPETS 8 INTER19PS $311.41 CARPET REPAIR
106b26 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS. INC. $579.9N7.00 CONSTRUCTION PT-34-2
/, ]06627 AIR PRODUCTS R CHEMICAL INC. $15.296.00 06M AGREEMENT --OXYGEN GEN SYSTEM M.O.8-9-89
106628 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT $25.88 ASPHALT
106629 ALLVATER SERVICES $2,450.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICE
106630 ALTA SALES. INC. $585.07 INSTRUMENT PART
106631 ROB CO INC. 0/OR AMERICAN SEALS $7,004.68 CASKETS 6 SEALS
106632 AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY $369.22 CABERA
/ 106633 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $15.103,43 NOTICES 6 ADS
106634 APPLE ONE 57.122.70 TEMPORARY SERVICES
106635 ARIZONA INSTRUMENTS CORP. $424.50 INSTRUMENT PARTS
106636 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CD. $1,564.13 TRUCK PARTS
{ 106637 THE AVEBURY GROUP $2,529.98 MECHANICAL PARTS
10663A RC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY. INC. $661.50 CABLE
106639 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 6114.055.91 GRIT REEOVAL M.0.7-13-88
{ 106640 BANANA BLUE PRINT S1.533.19 PRINTING
106641 P.Y. RAROTTI AND ASSOC. $5,437.50 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES P1-34-162.P2-31
X
106642 BAXTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $1.597.35 LAB SUPPLIES
2 106643 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $754.95 INSTRUMENT
106644 JAMES SEN27E $413.48 METING EXPENSE
M b0 106645 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS 9206.68 OFFICE SUPPLIES
106646 BRAGS CRANE A PIGGING CO. $1,562.00 CRANE RENTAL
106647 BR INDERSON CORP. $1.071,352.80 CONSTRUCTION J-19-2
1 y 106648 BROWN 6 CALDWELL CONSULTING $226.281.78 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19
1 106649 KATRINA BROWN S RUSSELL BROWN 5975.00 LIABILITY CLAIMS
106650 STEVE BUBALO CONSTRUCTION CO. $596,715.41 CONSTRUCTION 14-1-IB
106651 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $569.69 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
106652 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES. INC. $10.584.OG ENGINEERING SERVICES - SURVEYING
106653 GARY G. STREED S1.320.44 PETTY CASH NEIIOIURSEENT
T 106654 CAL-CHEM SALES $149.35 RUBBER PRODUCTS
106655 CAL SOUTH EQUIPMENT CO. $495.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
106656 CAL STATE SEAL COMPANY $97.30 PUMP PARTS
t 106657 CALTROL . INC. $12.90 REGULATOR PARTS
106658 CAL TYPE OFFICE MACHINES. INC. $49.84 TYPENRITTER MAINTENANCE
106659 CALIFORNIA FILTRATION $243.02 FILTER
{ 106660 JOHN CAROLLO ENS. 910.545.16 ENGINEERING SERVICES - STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
196661 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS 3221.904.0E ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-36.P2-42.PI-20.I-9
196662 CASTLE CONTROLS. INC. 3568.6P VALVE
106663 CENTURY SAFETY INST. R SUPP. $204.90 SAFETY SUPPLIES
106664 CHALLENGE. BEARING R IND. SPLY $711.23 HARDWARE
106665 KELLY CHRISTENSEN $413.75 MEETING EXPENSE
106666 CHROMALOY SALES $1,829.11 ELECTRIC PART
10E667 CHROME CRANKSHAFT. INC. $480.00 MECHANICAL PARTS
L
J �
FUND NO 919- JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/02/9V PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/09/90 POSTING DATE 05/09/90
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
106668 CHUBB GROUP OF INS.. AS $6,148.64 LIABILM CLAIM
106669 CORINNE CLAISON $223.75 MEETING EXPENSE
/ /96679 COAST AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION 5309.74 TRUCE PARTS
I16671 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $81.50 FIRE EQUIPMENT
106672 COLICM AND SONS '$347.395.50 CONSTRUCTION 7-11-16
106673 C.I.E.S. . CO. . INC. $660.00 PUMP PARTS
106674 CONNELL G.M. PARTS / DIV. 5258.99 TRUCK PAR15
106675 CON-WAY WESTERN EXPRESS $57.37 FREIGHT
106676 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST, SA. 122.31 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
106677 CONS OLIDATED PLASTICS CO. SBT1.81 SAMPLE PARTS
106678 CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPHICS $96.43 BLUEPRIHIING
(- 106679 CONTAINCRIIED CHEMICAL OISPOSA 51.399.00 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL
106680 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS S1.841.95 BLUEPRINTING M.O.7-1 89
106682 CONTROL CAULES. INC. $34.76 TRUCK PARTS
/ 106682 COOPER INDUSTRIES. INC. $2.820.145.68 ENGINES M.O. 5-13-67.6-8-88 3-19A
106683 COORDINATED EQUIP. CO.. INC. $500.00 TRUCK PARTS
106684 R. E. COULTER CRANE RENTAL $1.188.00 RENTAL BQUIPMEHT
(. 106685 COUNTY VHOLESALE ELECTRIC 51.174.94 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
106686 CRYSTAL CLEAR WINDOW MAINT. 5515.25 WINDOW CLEANING
106687 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE S457.66 TIMES
/ X 1P6688 TOM DAMES 3355.93 MEETING EXPENSE
Z 106689 DE ANZA CORPORATION 5920.00 STORAGE FEES
106690 MICHAEL R. DEBLIEUX $19.229.33 DRUBBED) C0UP PAYOFF
1 CAI 106691 DESKTOP GRAPHICS A DESIGN $24.00 PRINTING
106692 DEZURIK AND/OR CS CO. $3.732.38 VALVE PARTS
106693 DICKSONS f838.74 ELECTRIC PARTS
1 106694 OIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES S494.06 PRINTING
- TJ 106695 D1 SCO PRINT COMPANY $
A.561.ei OFFICE EQUIPMENT
106696 DORA00 EN T E.R PRI SE S. INC. 57.218.87 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS
L 106697 DONN EDWARDS CORP. $1.121.85 PAINT SUPPLIES
106698 EASTMAN. INC. 52.298.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES
106699 W. H. EBERT CORP. $526,759.50 CONSTRUCTION 2-26-2.2-27
106700 EFFECTIVE VISUAL IMAGERY S476.53 PRESENTATION AIDS
106701 ELECTRO NUMERICS INC. 12.997.72 INSTRUMENT PARTS
1067V2 EOVARO L. ELLIOT, JP.. S2.182.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-33
106703 ENCMANTER. INC. 511.800.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.3-14-90
116704 FACILITIES SUPPORT CO. $235.49 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
106705 JOHN B. FALKENSTEIN P.E. S4.925.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-4,J-20
106706 FARR SALES a SERVICE $217.86 FILTER
106707 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. 5169.25 AIR FREIGHT
106708 FERRELLGAS $22.95 PROPANE
106709 FISCHER 6 PORTER CO. 5122.966.74 CHLORINATION PARTS /INSTRUMENT M.0.12-14-88
106710 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $335.75 LAB SUPPLIES
106711 FLAT B VERTICAL CONCRETE 2197.50 CONCRETE CUTTING
1` 1I6712 FLEXIBLE SYSTEMS 5338.92 STRAINER
106713 FLUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $1,455.45 PIMP
J •
> C '
FUND 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5102/90 PAGE 3 f
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/09/90 POSTING DATE IA5/09/90
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
106TIS FORPORO CO. / NAG SYSTEMS 92,978.04 INSTRUMENTBUILDING
SUPPLIES
106715 6ANAML LV NBER CO. 39TB.09 BU[LOING MATERIALS
I l0E)17 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. S1.B00.50 TELEPHONE SERVICES
l06717 OE0R 6E LEECH R AS
i411.25 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
106718 GIERLICH-MITCNF.LL. INC. $3,769.88 MECHANICAL PARTS
1. 106T19 60LDEN COAST SAWDUST PR00. $3,025.00 SAWDUST
106720 1000 HEART WILCOX CO. 925.29 PUBLICATION
106721 GRAPHIC CONTROLS 5191.87 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
106722 GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION $420.00 ! STREET SWEEPING
106723 OON GREEK L ASSOCIATES $4.111.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES - SURVEYING
106724 GEORGE T. HALL CO. $2.985.18 SCRUBBER PARTS
�. 106725 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $312.93 GAUGE
106726 HARRIS DATA COMIC. 3NC. $299.63 COMPUTER REPAIRS
106727 JANES R. HARRIS $137.01 MEETING EXPENSE
106TPP . HATCH 8 KIRK. INC. $2,925.01 MECHANCCAL PALATE
.106729 MARV AND BUSINESS REVIEW $55.00 PUBLICATION '
106730 WILLIAM D. HAUSER $426.00 MEETING EXPENSE
/. 106731 S. A. HEALY CO. $102.603.59 CONSTRUCTION PI-35-1
106732 HIL TI. INC. $25.66 WASHER
106733 HOERBIGER C.V.S. CALIF. A INC. $110.13 MECHANICAL PARTS
106739 HOUSE OF BATTERIES $96.65 BATTERIES
106735 R.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. $3.969.93 PAINT SUPPLIES
106736 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STAMP 9910.94• RUBBER STAMPS
b0 106737 IND INDUSTRIES 91029.22 ELECTRIC PARTS
106738 ISCO. INC. 519.025.00 ENGINE PARTS
ID6739 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $102.747.37. FERRIC CHLONGHt M.0.11-08-89
n 106740 INDUSTRIAL METAL SUPPLY CO. $1.168.28 BASIN MILS
W IOb 741 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1.246.59 CONNE RS
106792 IHEI LCO OE GREMORY, INC. 59.198.06 MECHANICAL PARTS
106743 INGRAM PAPER 91.383.38 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
106744 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $1.025.31 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
106745 J S W SCIENTIFIC 91.530.72 LAB SUPPLIES
/ 10670E JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $897.69 INSTRUMENT PARTS
116717 JENSEN IDOLS 9 ALLOYS $154.53 TOOLS
106748 JOYCE OFFICE PRODUCTS $60.95- OFFICE SUPPLIES
106749 KA LLEEN•3 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 91.509.33 OFFICE SUPPLIES
�+ 1P6750 KAMAN BEARINGS 6 SUPPLY $67.60 FITTINGS
106751 KANER COMPANY $1,508.49 HARDWARE
/ 106782 THE KEITH COMPANIES 9418.75 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-3565-36
1236753 KENRO. INC. $700.113.70 CONSTRUCTION 5-36-2
106754 KIEWIT PACIFIC CO. 6388.257.60i CONSTRUCTION PI-20
L 106755 KING BEARING, INC. 91.820.53 MECHANICAL PARTS
10675E KHOR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $197.66 mots
IR6757 MARTIN BOADICKA SP $2.550.09. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 1-16-IB
106758 L 9 C TIRE SERVICE $85.00 TRUCK PARTS
�- 106759 L.A. LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $295.29 PUMP PARTS
L.
(
FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/1)2/90 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/09/90 POSTING DATE 05/09/90
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
/ 106760 LIEBERT ASSOCIATES OF $179.82 ELECTRIC PARTS
166761 JOHN LISCE PUMPS* INC. 536.13 FREIGHT
/ 106762 LORAIN PRODUCTS SI.190.65 SERVICE ACREEIONT - LIANCB POWER
106763 NPS 1293.31 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVIC
106764 KACOMCD f1A7.2D SERVICE REMOUNT
/ 106766 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS. INC. $2,574.50 MECHANICAL PUTS
111066 N A M ASSOCIATION f1.358.93 MEMBERSHIP
106767 KARVAC ELECTRONICS $194.26 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
106768 MATT - CHLORr INC. S2r172.92 MECHANICAL PARTS
106769 METE MA $58.85 INSTRUMENT
106770 MCKENNA ENGR. 6 EQUIP. $5,121.41 PUMP PARTS
1 0677 1
NCMASTER-CARP SUPPLY CO. SI.053.82 PUMP PASTS
106772 NICK GAGE COMPUTER 512.009.89 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
I96773 HICROAGE COMPUTER STORES l9r059.R1 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
106774 MICROSOFT QUICK BASIC 4.5 1320.94 COMPUTER SOFTWARE UP PAGE
I06775 MILTON ROY COMPANY 1294.33 POMP PARTS
I06776 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES f1.800.75 IAB SERVICES
�- 106777 NOORE PRODUCTS CO. SIr512.55 TRANSDUCER
106778 MOTION INDUSTRIES. INC. 9016.99 MECHANICAL PUTS
106779 NAT. COUNCIL FOR ED. ON INFO. 5225.O0 REGISTRATION M
X 106700 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSN f33.50 PUBLICATIONS
= 106781 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES. INC. $97,499.26 CONSTRUCTION 5-27
1067R2 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $A50.66 COMPUTER PUT
T W 106783 OUST N. MENDERS CONEY. CO. 92,985.43T.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-33
106789 NENARM ELECTRONICS 559.35 COMPUTER PARTS
I06785 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $6.00 WATER USEAGE
1 106786 NORTH SUPPLY $58.30 VIOLS
106787 OFFICE PAVILION/INTERIOP RES. f95.699.75 OFFICE FURNITURE J-7T4
r 106780 IN SYSTEMS CO. f28.501.36 CHLORINE M.0.2-14-W
106789 OLYMPIC CHEMICAL COMPANY $2.987.29 CHLORINE M.0.2-14-90
106790 ORANGE BEARING. INC. $162.57 MECHANICAL PUTS
106791 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. 5190.10 TRUCK PUTS
M 106792 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. 31.6B5.9P HYDROCHLORIC ACID
116793 Ofl AH BE Sp
OPTING GOODS f]91.2A LINE MARKER
206794 ORANGE VALVE A FITTING CO. f1.069.R9 FITTINGS
10f795 OSCAR•S LOCK A SAFE f111.5f LACKS
106796 OXYGEN SERVICE $155.96 SPECIALTY GASES
106797 COU14TY OF ORANGE $200.DO MAPPING
106798 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 14.926.67 DEMAND COMP DISTRIBUTION
I UR 799 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT S4.929.91 REIMBURSE MUM COP INSURANCE
106800 PACIFIC PARTS $5.454.59 INSTRUMENT PUTS
I E6801 PACIFIC PROCESS EBUIPMENT.INC. f1.179.5P IPCBANCIU PUTS
1U68U2 PACIFIC SAFETY FO LIP
"ENT CO. At r 097.B9 SAFETY SUPPLIES
106603 PACIFIC BELL 5709.59 TELEPHONE SERVICES
106809 PACTEL CELLULAP $153.3T CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES
106805 PAK NEST $333.20 JANITORIAL SUPPLIER
L-
J •
FUNB( 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/62/90 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/09/90 POSTING DATE 05/09/90
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
106897 PEERLESS WIPING MATERIALS CO. 5649.3E JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
146808 PERFORMANCE SEMINAR GROUP $165.40 INSTRUMENT
�- 10680E PERSPECTIVE ISEMEASUREMENTS $tl.256.81 INSTRUMENT
106810 POLY ENTER INC. r INC. S990.25 SAFETY SUPPLIES
10681I POWER SE, INC. f28SL91.27 POLYMERS M.O.1-10-90,E-9-89
/ 106A11 POWER SYSTE9S 1191.89 ENGINE PARTS
106813 HARD LD PRIMROSE ICE 240.00 ICE
106814 THE PROJECTS SOLUTION OCO.NS f9,240.00 PUBLCAIONSINSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.8-10-BB
I06815 PENO OR EILLELECT PUBLICATIONS ,027.70 PUBLICATIONS
OOT
106815 R.P.N. ELECTRIC MOTORS f1.027.74 MEETING MOTOR REPAIR
106817 DAYID RAT 3602.39 SAFETY EXPENSE
106818 RED WING SHOES f87.51 SAFETY SHOES
106R10 REMOTE METER RESETTING SYSTEM f30.05 POSTAGE
$56
106519 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. f560.05 MECHANIC SUPPLIES
I06820 REMOLD POWER TRANSMISSION 5107.95 NCCN SERE PARTS
106822 MILTON Sr WATSON b GE0.SHON S64.00 LEGAL MEETING
M.0.6-11-86
106822 MILTON RIVERS f573.22 CONSTRUCTION
TIONNlq6J-
T IC6824 J. R. ROBERTS CORP. l966.671.7P FREIGHT
J-1]
- 106825 ROOT TRUCKING S35.Dl INSIGHT
106826 ROSEMITE INC.ILOC f2.635.00 IATTERIES PARTS
�. X 106827 SAB WIFE IN f1$265.00 PAS CLE
Z 106828 SAFETY ANLCEN CORP. f283.68 PAR'[S CLCANSH
]06825 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS f2S3.6P ELECTRIC MOTOR
( w 106829 SANTA FE BAG CO. $395.78 BAGS
106830 THE SCHOOLER CO. $2.200.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
106831 SCHULER ENGINEERING CORP. $235.803.78 CONSTRUCTION PI-27-162
n 106832 SEA COAST DESIGNS $3,932.62 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
1 106833, SEARS. ROEBUCK R CO. $95.60 TOOLS
106834 S.F. SERRANTINO 3539.7E - MEETING EXPENSE
106835 SEWER EQUIP. CO. OF AMERICA $2,645.00 TOOLS
106836 SHAMROCK SECURITY $411.00 SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS
106837 SHAMROCK SUPPLY f254.50 TOOLS
106838 SMITH-EMERY CO. $5,410.04 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89
IT6839 SOFT YAREH OUSE 5128.8F COMPUTER PARTS
10604U SO. COAST AIR QUALITY f1,350.00 APPLICATION FEES
/ 106841 SO. CALIF. COASTAL WATER f200.0UQ.OU SCCWRPA ADVANCE
106842 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. f4.197.93 POWER
106845 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. 35.754.30 DIESEL FUEL
106844 SPACESPVER SYSTEMS. INC. $2,161.25 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
106045 SPARKLETIS DRINKING WATER f1,628.57 DRINKING WATER
106846 STAMEN Z. SPASSOFF, P.E. f5.760.L0 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2.P1-33,P1-37
C 106047 STAR TOOL a SUPPLY CO. $656.93 TOOLS
106848 SUMMIT STEEL $1,232.50 STEEL
1P6849 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $178.50 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
` 106850 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL. INC. $858.93 TOOLS
106051 T b C INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS, INC $1,291.23 ELECTRIC PARTS
1,
J �
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/32/9C PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/09/90 POSTING DATE 05/09/90
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
106852 TALIN TIRE. INC. $2.263.34 TIRES
166853 THE TEXWIPE COMPANY f129.19 OFFICE SUPPLIES
/ IP EM 6854 THEO-TELLO-BUSCH, INC. AM OU CHLORINE SYST REPAIRS
106855 THERMO ANALYTICAL, INC./NNOCAL f16.00 LAB SERVICES
106856 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE, INC. $16.688.44 TRAFFIC CONTROL. DIST 3
IC6857 TRAVEL TRAVEL f4,432.00 TRAVEL SERVICES M.0.6-14-87
186858 TRUCK A AUTO SUPPLY, INC. $878.81 TRUCK PARTS
106959 J.G. TUCKER A SON, INC. $575.30 INSTRUMENT PARTS
IC6860 TWINING LABORATORIES OF 28,242.75 SOIL TESTING H.0.6-14-89
106861 UNOCAL S201.85 UNLEADED GASOLINE
106862 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE S70.99 PARCEL SERVICES
�- 106E63 VWR SCIENTIFIC $1,396.50 LAB SUPPLIES
IO6R64 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $5,788.28 FITTINGS
106865 VALLEY OETROIT DIESEL $637.50 ENGINE REPAIRS
106866 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 1406.42 SAFETY SUPPLIES
106P67 RICHARD W. VON LANCER f349.16 MEETING EXPENSE
106868 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $710.75 REPAIR MANUAL
106869 WALTER$ WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 91.352.57 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
106870 JOHN R. NAPLES $533.30 ODOR CONTROL CONSULS ITT
1068T1 WARRINGTON 1115.00 INSTRUMENT MIBUT14 N
!X 106872 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY 114,042.94 CAUSTIC SODA X.0.8-9 69
= 1060T3 'WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. 1825.16 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
ID6R74 WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY $4.949.63 - - INSECTICIDE
to 106875 JAMES B JUDI'TH WILSON $365.74 LIABILITY CLAIM
106876 WORDPERFECT CORP. $1,845.93 C@RUTER SOFTNARE
106877 XEROX CORP. f5.045.28 COPIER LEASES
L� R NG 1.23 MTING EXPENSE
1I1,O66817188 2NOIEBISTIAN f814.10 CONSTRUCTION PI-34-1
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 05/09/90 112.758.570.01
I.
(
(J.
J •
'l 10 9199 - JT DIET WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/02/90 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMECR AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/09/90 POSTING DATE 05/09/90
' SUKHARY AMOUNT
02 OPEN POND P 663.83
02 CAP PAC FUND 627.797.45
03 OPEN PON) - 16.975.22
05 OPEN POND 1,446.71
05 GAP PAC FUND 822.360.63
06 CAP PAC POND 1,175.25
07 OPEN FOND 3,878.28
07 CAP PAC POND 394,805.4E
/11 OPEN POND 51.26
Oil CAP PAC FOND 318.01 7
014 CAP PAC PIRID 451,350.10
0566 CAP PAC FM 66.689.26
0667 OPEN POND 2,045.60
07614 OPEN FUND 9.14
JT OPEN POND 399,974.42
CORD 9.572,462.4E
SELF FUNDED WOMEN COMP INSURANCE PON 12,417.85
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND 364,149.04
m
aC 0 12,758,570.01
2
Ctl
H-„
n
V
/
1 -
1.
J •
FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAF116L PPOCESSING DATE 5/17/9n PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AI'4S
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OPANGE_ COUNTY
� CLAIMS PAID 047R319t. FOSf INs OA7E IIS�2!%9 S
. ' . YRRRANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT ., OESCR IP710N
106928 A-1 EXPRESS DELIVFRY SERVICE $23.31 FREIGHT
i. 106929 AND KENT. INC. $99.28 _INSTRUMENT PART___-___,___,____,___
1 C'6930 AT L T $777.73 - LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
/ • 106931 ACADEMY OF DEFENSIVE DRIVING $670.00 DRIVER TRAINING
106932 ACCU-LABS RESEARCH• INC. 3106.00 LAB SERVICES
1 OE933 THE ADVANCE GROUP $66.26 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
106934 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS. INC. 3253.656.50 CONSTRUCTION PI-34-2
106935 ACRO TECH SURVETS. INC. S1.466.25 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
n _.__.-.. ._-
106937 AIRCRAFT HURTING L ELECTRICAL 528.48 TRUCK PART
106937 AIR COLD SUPPLY CHEMICAL
$520.A0 OAK GREEME
10693B AIR PRODUCTS 8 CHEMICAL INC. $15.296.00 OAK AGREEMENT - OXYGEN OW 848TE1 M.0.8-9-89___
' --III69S9--���—LEaIII'N6�9c'IA7LRTn LL STT T-di !---- — SIr293.52 - ---AUtONOBtLBiv:aRB
106940 SAFETY SUPPLY AMERICA $12.6/ SAFETY SUPPLIES
106941 ALPHAGA2 $1.360.10 PROPANE
-'III69di Y SERVICES �(.�i94.00 VACIIDM SRUCE 68RVIC6
r 106943 AMERICAN DISTRICT TELEGRAPH 3553.16 SERVICE AGREEMENT
106944 ROBCO INC. $/OR AMERICAN SEALS $4,566.68 GASKETS 6 SEALS
.7,6041�NEWrj TI�TFENNTS.r NUFFEY ' _--s6e.s� cAileRA
I .+ 106946 AMERICAN VULKAN COOP. 39.E22.77 MECHANICAL PARTS
106947 AMERITECH S97.75 COPIER LEASE
I R6$d6 L�}7-8F-CFI! IIE ITI 1,235,401.44 SEIICRREMBILITA710N— I1.0.12-Id-55—
/ : 106949 APPLE ONE $1.119.20 TEMPORARY SERVICES
106950 ARATEK SERVICES, INC. 31.611.59 UNIFORM eEXTAL9
Q -]AR%II(---TSI N�DL�S ARHRNYr§ - —__—dT01.9T' MEETING E%T6NS8
S� 106952 ARIZONA INSTRUMENTS CORP. $127.50 INSTRUMENT PARTS
_ 106953 ARROW TRUCK BODIES 6 EOUIFMENT $2,186.75 TOOL SOX
TR6Ys�--FssdE7A7€11 SOTI�YFOINEFF1Fc 9.§IB.O�ROIL TESTING-
+ M 1U6955 AMSA $100.00 REGISTRATION
10695A FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 3167/592.94 GRIT REMOVAL M.0.7-13-
T0693T- ---P.Y-II�OTT1 AN I�A52N� f6r31T0:00 CONSTRUCTION-SERVICES F
+ 196958 3. BATEMAN S585.00 DEFERRED CORP DISTRIBUIGN
+� 106959 BANTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS _ _ $2.598.80 _LAB SUPPLIES_
.l WOLF— SOEAY-O€1N�M7CITFN'i'RIIR�6-A3— —f37:3TE.66 RNGiNRNRINc"RRRVI R3 d:3-33-
106961 BIOCYCLE $89.00 PUBLICATION
106962 HOWARD BLEVINS 3200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIB ON
i 06963.._--_—NDTRC�A2IIAOL`OFFTOE—R660ZTS-.—..__._ ..-- .__.._.i16R.AS -.--.---_.---- ...-61FICE SUPPLIES..__ .... _..__.-__ .____.
106964 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $4,327.32 RADIATOR REPAIRS
106965 BON-A-RUES $263.44 TRUCK PARTS
:+ -iIIs96d-""—IIOiCE'-EAO7NEER IAOTOD7 '- d1-g543:00 -- -'- —--"- ----BxelxeeRlNG sepvices - -
( 106967 BROWN S CALDYELL $2,559.75 LAB SERVICES
106968 BROWN L CALDYELL CONSULTING" $138,738.75 ENGINEERING SERVICES J- 9 3194':SS_ _.. -.._ - _. --.- ELECTRIC RUFPLERO - __. _..._..._._ ._._ .
n 106970 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES. INC. $6,552.00 SURVEYING SERVICES US 8-71
+. 106971 GARY G. STREEO $257.47 PETTY CASH REIHBURSEU
�. 106973 CPT CORP. / SUMMIT SOLUTIONS 32.205.08 MAINTENANCE AGREE W
1 _
FUND N( 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/11/9P PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP45
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
----- CCAIMTTAIU D5723790-POST ING"DA7 C'0 57 237 90--- ''_. .
/ .
WARRANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT OC SC4 WTION
106974 IS COMPANY $3.262.07 VALVE PARTS
206975 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH• INC. f2.001.17 LAB SUPPLIES
AG9976_'-' CALTROLT'TNC— "- -1T.i7U�T� RBCUi.AYbn"PnRTB-' ---
( 106977 CALIF. BUSINESS LAW INSTITUTE $699.00 REGISTRATION
106978 CALIFORNIA FILTRATION _ _ $1,162.93 ENGINE PARTS
- --[BS977—CARD CC7f�66VCE'FNG]REEKS— —-"-CI�13 S.1�- BNCINBBRINC SBRVICe5�Re5 A9-121
ii 106980 LCANDRE P. CATACUTAN $344.68 MEETING EXPENSE
106981 CHALLENGE BEARING 1 IND. SPLY $766.94 MECHANICAL PARTS
IDE932 bLUMbL A, LHARrTTr---
7,' 106983 CHEM SERVICE $55.52 LAB SUPPLIES
106984 CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC. f14.290406 UNLEADED GASOLINE -
io -1D69A5- CRK RBEZR'RNRSA7fFT� IN,. salo.00 - neCiLiMh411.'PARYB ""--- ---
f 7 196966 COLICH AND SONS $363.647.73 CONSTRUCTION 7-ll-ll
106987 COMFRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF $3,265.13 FITTINGS
-fOb9RR --CONRECLT,.Ir. "P'RATI DIV. FREW
! n 196989 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL GIST. 16,223.85 ELECTRICAL PARTS
106990 CONSOLIDATED FRE16HTMAYS. $301.54" FREIGHT
-- ---10A991 CORTTREMC_CWERR'AL CO ----
j, 106992 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS $1.004.45 BLUEPRINTING M.0.7-12-89
106993 CONTROL DATA LOPP. $361-.13 INSTRUMENT PART
IQ6994-�bDTItbL co .O EERARI'LACPAfFTS "---
( = 106995 COOPER 3N OUSTRIESo INC. $1.825,982,60 ENGINES H.O.5-13-67.6-8-88. J-19A.
.-+ 106996 COOK DINATEO EBUIP. CO., INCA l250J00 TRUER PARTS
M_106997- "CO3FA RESTAOT . TRU A PAEi6T —
_(' 106996 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC f652.86 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
106999 CNANETER $365.30 TRUCE PARTS
:5dd-.Wv— LIA8lLTtFZU39 --
107YB1 CAL WATER $287.404 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
N 107002 LARRY CURTI TRUCK H .EQUIPMENT f23.94 O.00 SLUDGE REMOVAL H.O.4-13-88 -
___I07003- DXET"I' __ 137.73— VALVE PAETs---'
! a 107004 DE ANZA CORPORATION 6150.08 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
107005 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES 91.507.65 PRINTING
--1876b�--"---01CC0'PATATCORP7+AV —3a1l-.33 -o"m EQUIPMENT--- '—
! 1070DI DUNN EDWARDS CORP: 1735.79 PAINT SUPPLIES
107008 U-VALS SALES $542.55 FITTINGS
TMC. INSTRUMENT.._-______
107619 ENSECO-CRL 12.350.90 OCEAN SAMPLING
107011 EASTMAN, INC. $818.56 OFFICE SUPPLIES
-"_IO7U12- ____ELIISV4TERS�-ENGINEERTA�B-A'AACT 3ii3dd:dd UCEAN'RESCARCIr
107023 EFFECTIVE VISUAL IMAGERY $22.84 SLIDES
107014 ELECT AIR $466.18 MECRANICAL PARTS
1 D76I5___._____._ECEfTP.ORFF-d3L II1L INU-C O. 1366:90- SRAFT
107016 Ado SERVICE COMPANY $225.76 VALVE PARTS
147017 FACILITIES SUFPORT CO. $33.98 SMALL HARDWARE
FAIERES_.___-__.___._' 1353.3E DEFERRED COMP-UFSTRIRTiTC6M-
1 107019 JOHN B. FALKENSTEIN P.C. $3,759.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 3-7-4. 3-20
I . .
i
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/17/90 FAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AF93
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
-
', . WARRANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT _DESCRIPTION
( i 107920 FARR SALES S SERVICE s8.580.00 FILTERS
107U2l FEDERAL EMPRESS CORP. $172.50 AIR FREIGHT
i 107R42 FISL NER 6 DER Cp. 25.U8 INSTRUMENT PARTS
( • 107023 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. 1455.18 LAB SUPPLIES
107024 FLAT a VERTICAL CONCRETE $856.50 CONCRETE CUTTING
1 Ti D R5 FLUID TECH $141.21 SCRUBBER PART
I- : IOTU26 FORD AEROSPACE A COHN. CORP. $19,941.54 REFUND USSR ME OVERPAYMENT
107V27 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA 3307.29 PHOTO SUPPLIES _
107 T28 FOX_ENTERPRISES - $1,825.00 SAFE2Y CONSULTING
107029 FOXBORO CO. / NAG SYSTEMS S1r329.69 FITTINGS
107030 A.F. FREY -- $105.00 DEFERRED CORP DISTRIBUTION
141031 iF OSR�R6TNfr-R N6 SERVICES . 5199.61 VALVES
f 107032 CITY OF FULLERTON $38.91 WATER USEAGE
107033 GTE EDUCATION SERVICES, INC. $98.61 ANSA BULLETIN BOARD
070E CANAHLLUMBER CO. $2 5.90 LONGER
U 107035 GARDNER LITHOGRAPH. - $189.50 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT
107036 GENERAL CHEMICAL $7,898.00 CRENICALS
1 7G33 GENERAL TELEPHONECO. 9. 9 .97 TELEPHONE SERVICES
InTO38 FLORENCE L. GERDES 9471.20 MEETING EXPENSE
107039 GIERLICx-MITCHELL. INC. $11,342.84 MECHANICAL PARTS
X 6n DENUEST REFININS CO . FE 01 REFUND USER E OVERPAYMENT
1 m 2 107041 6RLAT' WESTERN RECLAMATION s3.500•00 STREET SWEEPING SERVICES
107092 DON, GREEK B ASSOCIATES s10.S18.00 SURVEYING SERVICES US 86-72
i TT9 EARLO L. GREER CO.. INT. .1.620.31 TRUCK PARTS
MI 107044 HANSON-LORAN CHFRICAL CO. $3.210.55 REFUND USER PER OVERPAYMENT
107C45 FRED A. HARPER $1.495.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
IT71'ifi NA G N 7N S 1 9 VALVE PARTS
W 101097 NATCM B KIRK. INC. 16.00 OL 15 ERCTN¢ PARTS
107098 HOER BIDER C.V.S. CALIF. b 'INCA s915.09 COMPRESSOR PARTS
DTbA$- BD�i[6"6. AbflONtZFC s3oo.co DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
I • 107050 HOUSE OF BATTERIES $1.130.99 BATTERIES
I•+T051 STEVEN J HOVEY l79.95 MEETING EXPENSE
imp A.S. HUGHESSAPEWSUPPLIES
107053 CITY OF HUNTINGTON REACH $15.918.50 WATER USGGE
107054 HUNTINGTON SUPPLY $114.99 HARDWARE _
--iDTd55-' MCC-IN3THLIRH —;i:i5 UTTER REPAIRS
107056 TWA ENGINEERS $7.005.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-27-2
T 107A57 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL 179.361.51— _P¢BBIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-08-89
_ —1D7558--TRC"6f1-395TER$�I _15 35 EUGiNE PARTS
( 107059 INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS. INC. 574.38 ELECTRIC PARTS
IC7060 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1,053.79 CONNECTORS
—lO7B SI'-"—'-----IND RAM'-FA➢EP-- 12i T24:]5-- ie"rER
( T, 167362 INSIDE WASTE C/O CAP. REPOPTS 5255.00 SUBSCRIPTION
107063 INTERNATIONAL SENSOR TECH. 50.957.55 INSTRUMENT PARTS
T,—ID7Obi-----"—IN4TNE-IEANCR'7iT ER�ISTR'Rl`-'--"'-'-- —(1'6:4i---- WATER USEABe--- -----
( 107065 GAFAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP. :1.556.60 JANITORIAL SERVICES
FUND I( 919R - Jl GIST WORKINP CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE S/17/90 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION UISTPICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
..—_ . .__.__...._..__.__._ ._...............—_. -MAIKA PA III'§bf23)VA-- Edit I" OA7t' b3123)sR'_...._..... _. . .. .._ . ..... ...._ _..... ..............
i R
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
11,7066 A.I. JOHNSON COMPANY $97.26 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
107067 GERALD JONES $842.25 MEETING UPRISE
9 _JiT7TE 3TFTEF --uPPicE EDPPi381r—'—._._..—.___.._._.
107069 MALLELN.S COMPUTER SUPPLIES $410.91 COMPUTER PARTS ,
107670 NAMAN BEARINGS R SUPPLY 943.29 FITTINGS
§7..._.—. .—__.—____TOOLS
107072 NEEN-RUT ABRASIVE CO. $499.38 TOOLS
107073 KING BEARING, INC. f702.02 MECHANICAL PARTS
f V 107075 MARTIN KORDICK. SR $2.475.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 1-14-1
107U76 H.Y. LAWHASTEP 6 CO., INC. S7.20q.50 SOIL TESTING
�n_—i07b77--LEED3-E'-NbbTNRA�-- -�3f3.a�U INS'fSUNENP 6UPPLIBB-- _ -- --"�"'- ---"�
I 10707E LIEDERT ASSOCIATES OF S67q.44 ELECTRIC PARTS
107079 WILLIAM J. LLOYD 589.25 MEETING EXPENSE
--167bED---E6CEC-AZENTV— E3S6:S�uecb eEa---- -----'--
/ 107061 LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION f140.620.37 POOLED EMISSIONS ESTIMATING PROGWI M.O. 12-13-89
. 107082 A.J. LYNCH CO, f1.2T6.02 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
_ dYa bS �AN3-NNtCYA�TA�---i3a6�.d-6— BE&VICE ACR8FH8HT --------------
_ 107684 MPS f80.54 PBOTOCRAPRIC SERVICES
1P7085 MALCOLM PIRNIE 9 INC. $2.733.97 ENGINEERING SERVICES
ri m`-157d3d'---WAN PTVELEE�[bAT�— f52.85 11fS1'kI1MEMi BUPPLISS ---------
r. X 107087 KETEMA 51.038.39 INSTRUMENT REPAIR
+ = 10708E MCNASTE.R-CARP SUPPLY CO. $752.71 BUILDING MATERIALS
'� n�IBM rS4AEASGFEPFAq-T3NTROL SYS. INC.
207090 THOMAS R. MELTON $187.74 MILEAGE EXPENSE
1 197091 MICROAGE COMPUTER $5.213.69 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
TV7b4T- lUtWWr_"'RVDTER STORES
I 107093 MILLIPORE AND/OP WATERS 51.228.g4 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
107994 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL: INC. 1102.00 PUBLICATION
__tdfP95NItAATC-b:TidbR�' ---T§31=dam_ —__.AEsiiNc-BRPPAR�
107096 MORGAN CRANE CO.. INC. $4,411.82 TRUCK PARTS
107097 MOTION INDUSTRIES. INC. $431.17 MOTORS
.-91TYMLT-W�_'— —__. __SIS�b2 RAAIb3
107099 MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICES 480.38 INSTRUMENT REPAIR
107104 MULTEK9 INC. $954.93 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT
Nin'091C-PL'ANT-MVI'try. IAi:—____---.IB'G6fv.3b ___.-.victim TRUCK-GERVYDE-._.__.__._.
107102 NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPLY $196.78 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
d 107103 NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION $500.00 DEPOSIT a
6 '_IN7i 2d ..—_—.277�bt-NTQPbKT"BEATN--.—.--. .�._;g.46_...._._--._—_..WATER
( 107105 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 476.0o REFUND USSR PEE OVRUAYNKST
107106 CHARLES NICHOLS $29.54 MEETING MERGE
_.._.. ID71b7..___..__-_NddcAC-EDNTROLR: INCT. ..—____..... ____ ...._. . ._...i73b:2s_. _._ _._. - . . ARCNAMICAL IlARYb. .. ...... ..... ._.........__... .._..____. '
( i 107100 UNITED NOTTINGHAM $31.80 FREIGHT
107109 O.M.S./SOLAG DISPOSAL CO 965.00 TRASH REMOVAL
E77fU._____..__OCEUPATIUR3i"-VISTDN—bEdVIT[3-____._..___._.._
d 107111 ON-LINE ELECTRONICS 5112.10 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
as
�� r
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST MORNING CAF ITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/17/90 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
• _ _ _____ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS P11O 00T2!//90 POSTING DATE 05123191
-
WARRANT 00. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
! • 117112 ROBERT J. OOTEN $262.20 M m"a EXPENSE �
1!7113 ORANGE BEARING, INC. MCUANICAL PRLt78
j 1077IJ4 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY l315.55 ELECTRIC"SUPPLIES
f • 107115 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY CO. $331.85 - LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
107116 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. $2.082.47 FITTINGS
' • v
10711 OSCAR•S LOON L SAFE 9 . 0 SEES
. 107118 COUNTY SERVICE t2.29 8 B.70 SPECIALTY PROCESSING
107120 COUNTY OF GRANGE f3.10l.BO DATA UM ADVANCE SeRVICE3
107121 COUNT SELF-FUNDED MEDICAL INS t100r000.14 RE®HUN EWORSe
f 101122 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT t6.975.00 IEFERRRRe PoRS8P8 - INSURANCE
IOn22 BOBEAT L.SAFETY
ON f7S.p0 SAFETY SUPPLIES CEL6R________,_____
107123 PACIFIC SAFETY MAINTENANCE
CO. 1S.2d136 SAFETY SUPPLIES
' 107125 PACIFIC SEVEN MAINTENANCE COOP fB.861.16 SAYER RIPe3
10712! PAN WEST t1 299.gq ]AX17D&I6L SRjPLT¢S ____„___ _
lOi 21 6 S7EVC P�LET R IP125T MEETING WAGES
! 107127 ROY PENDERGRAFT f445.00 DEFINING COMP DISTRIBUTION
107128 PHOTO 1 SOUND CO. - 41,151.45 OFFICE ¢QUIPM¢NT _"_____
07129 YI LL IAN FIERCE $183.00 MEETING EXPENSE
107139 PIMA SRO SYSTEMS, INC. S44.243.47 SLUDGE R@IOVAL M.0.5-11-86
107131 PING YON $147.47 AS USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
X 107I3= PLAINS TR EVA U R Y f251.SO MPINIAIE — ---"
= 107133 POLYPURE• INC. $30.203.40 POLYMERS N.0.1-10-90.84-89
_107134 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. 1136L31 ELECTeI_C SUPPLIES
b0 107135 P4ESENTATION PROOUGiS $199.58 OPPICE SUPPLIES
ii
107136 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE S144.00 ICE
167137 F96FESSIONAL TANG ASSOCIATES $39.00 SUBSCRIPTION __
107138 PROFESSIONAL TREE CAR $2.003.00 'Y11E8 E&10PA1.
i 1 107139 THE PROJECTS SOLUTION CO. f4/399.90 INSTRUIRNTATION INSPECTION N.0.8-10418
167140 RADCLIFFE CONSULTING GRP fLO0.00 PUMP PARTS
-----------R -- T13—
ton 91 AI—NnOV--OISPDSIL co. --.-ii:07
_ 107142 RECYCr INC. ss9.900.60 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.1-11-88
107143 R.A. REED ELECTRIC 1503.25_ ELECTRIC MOTOR_
i 671 ft JEFFRET T. REED -f915.05 1¢e1'ixc E%PEN88
' f _ I071t5 THE REGISTER $439.55 NOTICES A ADS
197196 REMEDY TEMP SI.339.59 TPMPOMRY AIRY CIS.
" ---" 107157 "-7BE-TIE FUBLI�SUiP L�co. ---'--idoz:7s"--"`---"-iesTEuliexi•ENeeiies- "- ---- "__.
F 107148 NEVES ENGINEERING CO. 11.652.1R MANROLE COVERS
IC7149 RICHARDS, WATSON L GERSHON fir192.2] LEGAL SERVICES N.0.6-11-86
. _—io573e ---[i➢�£hEE aoob—_ . __..._.__�W.d9 s.MEETING Axe®n --"._____._____.__._____�
107151 ROYCE INSTRUMENT 61.131.23 INSTRUMENT PARTS
r 167152 RUTAN 6 TUCKER 129.336.29 LEGAL SERVICES__Wf1ICN/NM7 i_UNIYBRBAL CIlCUI79_ ,
Miss- 1 -H - f 81 :1 CRATING
f 10715 JOSEFH T. RTERSO 8 SON. AMC. S4 t/3719 PUMP PUT
107155 SAFE 7Y-NL[EN CORP. f132.80 PARTS CLPAHEL___
1E72"56--3A AM L CIN C 0 OR �� -- "10Ii.0�—"------"ELECTRIC MOTOR
r 107157 SANTA FE BAG CO. $36.01 FREIGHT
f
■C J i
FUND Non 1149 - JT+DISI WORMING CArITFL PROCESSING DATE 5/11194 PAGE 6
r ` REPORT PURGER AP43
__- COUNTY SARIIATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
r . _
r
F . WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION :'.
!' • 107150 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS 1NT•L SPl2.455.57 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-14-09
107159 SEA COAST DESIGNS S2.296.72 OFFICE FURNITURE
r
. .: —I➢77S0_—.._-SE7EA'i➢II7�['D-. DR-Al1ER71T._ ..... ..____-il TH77FB".""—._____.TODiS..... .__......._.___-__...-__.__
107161 SHAMROCK SUPPLY 5616.81 SAFETY SUPPLIES
107162 SHARED LOGIC. INC. $225.00 REGISTRATION
u9Ea-FB6 0viRPAriieMe ---"- r
( ii 10?364 CONSTANTINE SIRCELLO S15.391.10 DEFERRED CORM' PAY-OFF -
107165 SMITH-EMERY CO. 11.690.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89
I07396--- 3➢FT-VMMtfUSE- --E7H":L COMPUTER
f 107167 SOIL AND TESTING ENGINEERS $246.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.6-14-89
107168 SOLAR TURBINES INC. S90.18 MIGHT
➢7Ib9 S➢'.--C➢RST7TR-OUELT�— --S7�096.5o zitCATION PBBS ------
/ i 147179 SOUTH COAST DODGE S127.08 TRUCK PARTS
107171 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. $269.470.41 POWER
is 07I72------------SU. GALIP. LUIbUN 10. MWER Elie¢EiOcAixox e -
f 107273 50. CAL. GAS CO. 16.192.05 RATURAL GAS
207174 SQ. CALIF. UATER CO. - $90.65 WATER USEAGR
7775— S6UIWENH-C➢UFTOIL CO. sl;365.24DIESEL IVEL ------
( 107176 SPARKLETTS DRINKI MG WATER $1.546.67 DRINKING WATER
loll?? WESTALLOY INC. $2.295.17 WELDING SUPPLIES
'0 TI7a SPINTArbTUCu., INC. Fe1cE su9eLlu
( 207179 STAR TOOL 8-SUPPLY CO. 1566:15 TODL9
107180 STERLING ART $41.59 GRAPHIC SUPPLIES
IR7161--NTR .5a ImE ma ME-Se
-/ 107152 SUMMIT STEEL $2.434.93 STEEL
107183 SUN-BELT LANDSCAPE 1 MAINT. $3.847.09 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEBPING M.0.8-9-89
—IV7IEi---BUR-E�LUTSIC-C 3�.➢ - TRBGE PART
( �jo 107389 SUNSET FORD S21.98 TRUCK PARTS
107186 CON7INEN7AL AIR TOOL, INC. 1E1171.66 TOOLS
_ 1377E7--SORVEV0R3 nnr 3:214 07 -SAPE44 _ __—_-
1 10?184 TAYLOR-DUNN S106.25 TRUCK PARTS
107109 TEKMAR COMPANY $1.578.25 LAB SUPPLIES
—'107190-"--�'➢IIRE�IDWERTISER'S id7 . ASSE9MENf'uS E Fee MAIL W-510T
I 107193 TRAVEL TRAVEL $2,214,00 TRAVEL SERVICES M.0.6-14-87
107152 TRUCK 6 AUTO SUPPLY. INC. $543.65 TRUCK PARTS
".I07193"'__..._._.7:➢-TUCRER'TSON�'TIR._ _.____.•____..__—_____—_
107194 TWINING LABORATORIES OF $7,193.25 BOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89
207195 THE UNISGURCE CORP. $8,891.50 PAPER
-I11719G' —UNTTEO'YARIr[C SERV --"-HJ64:19-- —PARCEL SEEVices----
! 107197 PILLAR ELEVATOR COMPANY $326.15 SERVICE AGREEMENT
107198 VUR SCIENTIFIC $2,089.17 TAB SUPPLIES
—107199..-------___VALTW-CORPORETTOR- "__.______..__....__.. -5553:97._.-_____._REGULATOR PART____— ._....._.___..__. -_
r 107200 VALLEY CITIES SUFFLY CO. 14.541.09 FITTINGS
107201 VARIAN INSTRUMENT GROUP 1693.25 LAI EQUIPMENT
➢72E2-.�-7TITIW6ZNDUSTNTAC_SUPFC7 .. ____l730�58 -BAPETY SUPPLiRE-
( 107293 LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. INC. $6.921.14 CONSULTING SERVICES - CLEAN WATER GRANTS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/17/90 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMOLP AP43
COUNIV SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
""-'-
_ WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT _ _ DESCRIPTION
_ 107204 MARK 0. VALTEN $190.00 MEETING MUSE
107205 _ WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 5239.06 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
107FD6 CRGC"GAflREF! <-� 52.59 _.$ INBUMNCE CLAIMS ADMENISTRATOR
107207 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL $56.75 PUBLICATION
107208 SANT 6.-1 INAM __ 5342.0E _MEETING UPENSE
S7$u'T Jr. —fS6.4T REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
107210 VILLDAN ASSOCIATES $391.61 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-29
om 107211 ROURKE R WOODRUFF $46.296.19 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.6-4-89
$110.90 COPIER LEASES
107213 YELLOW SPRINGS INSTRUMENT CO. 1139.43 LAB REPAIRS
107214 VICTOR ZORZYNSKI 3600.27 METING EXPENSE
Tif7Z3� RICHARD U. LUGAR S2110.0+0 DEFERRED COMP DISTINCTION
-----------------
$5.6144844.53
! SUMMARY ANOONT _
. t-0P81I'FUNU
tK 02 OPER FUND 13,995,15
02 CAP PAC FUND 1,255,107.43
3-0P6R-FUND-- 13.91U.IU
05 OPER FUND 5,858.09
05 CAP PAC FUND 55,338.66
06-UPBR7FNNU-
1 07 OPEN FUND 13.883.96
07 CAP PAC FUND - 368,705.41
BII'OPERZ+UNU— - —B;SS3Ti7 —
III CAP PAC FUND 16.76
013 OPER FUND 36.00
016.OEPR'PUNO— T,992:9 --
r 014 CAP PAC "No 4,207.47
05R6 OPEN FUND 993.14
--1566 CAP FAG FUND --T.174-30__._ _._...____________.__._ —
1 . 07614 OPEN FUND 769.40
3T OPER FUND 1,014,210.78
. COMP
/ - SELF MOM WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FUND 119.862.03
3T WORKING CAPITAL FUND 179.126.23
9 5,614.844.53
_._.. - .
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2,
1 hereby certify that the Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting
on �_, 19 4 0 was duly posted for public inspection
at the main lobby of the Districts - offices on
19g0 .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 6�
day of 19 40.
Rita J. Brown, Secret
each of the Boards of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 &
14 of Orange County, California
\.O