Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-06-13/ Az�l COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS a s h OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA �N P.O. BOX 8127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 9270&7018 (714) 962-2411 June 6 , 1990 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 WEDNESDAY, JUNE 13, 1990 - 7:30 P.M. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. \ yfNJG.gi�� secretary Tentatively-Scheduled Upcoming Meetings: FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - Wednesday, June 20th, at 5: 30 p.m. DISTRICTS 3 & 11 - Thursday, June 21st, at 5: 30 p.m. SELECTION COMMITTEE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday, June 27th, at 5 : 30 p.m. CONSERVATION, - Thursday, June 28th, at 5 :30 p.m. L, RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS \ sl ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA ,p fans ave 20.WX 8127 ipUNfYN V1LLEY,WIfORMR 92� v1a s822�n �N�1 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings June Jun 13, 1990 Jun 27, 1990 July Jul 11, 1990 Jul 25, 1990 August Aug 08, 1990 None Scheduled September Sep 12, 1990 Sep 26, 1990 October Oct 10, 1990 Oct 24, 1990 .November Nov 14, 1990 None Scheduled December Dec 12, 1990 None Scheduled January Jan 09, 1991 Jan 23, 1991 February Feb 13, 1991 Feb 27, 1991 March Mar 13, 1991 Mar 27, 1991 April Apr 10, 1991 Apr 24, 1991 May May 08, 1991 May 29, 1991 June Jun 12, 1991 Jun 26, 1991 -BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127• 108" Ells Avenue of Orange County, California Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone:(714)962-2411 JOINT BOARDS AGENDA REGULAR MEETING JUNE 13, 1990 - 7:30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to. each agenda item are available for public inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call ( 3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tam, if necessary (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) (5) Public comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until .the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. (6 ) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports arr, for information only and require no action by the Directors. (a) Report of Joint Cho!,-man (b) Report of General Manager (c) Report of General Counsel 6/13/90o (7) EACH DISTRICT ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the _ following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman: District 1 - May 11, 1990 regular District 2 - May 11, 1990 regular District 3 - May 11, 1990 regular District 5 - May 11, 1990 regular District 6 - May 11, 1990 regular District 7 - May 11, 1990 regular District 11 - May 11, 1990 regular District 13 - May 11, 1990 regular District 14 - May 11, 1990 regular (8) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District. ) See pages "A" and "B" 5/09/90 5/23/90 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 399,974.42 $1,014,210.78 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 9,572,462.48 2,496,520.54 Joint Working Capital Fund - 384,149 .04 179,126 .23 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 12,417 .85 119,862. 03 DISTRICT NO. 1 - -0- 343 .00 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 628,461.28 1,269 ,102.58 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 16,975.22 73 ,910.10 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 823,807. 34 61,196 .75 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 1,175.25 257 .21 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 398,683.76 382,589 .43 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 369.27 8,460.43 DISTRICT NO. 13 - -0- 38.00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 451, 350.10 6,290 .41 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 66,689.26 2,167.64 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,045.60 -0- DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 9.14 769.40 $12,758 ,570.01 $5,614,844.53 -2- 6/13/90 (9) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 9(a) THROUGH 9(x) All matters placed on the consent calendar are 4./ considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. The Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation; rejecting the bid of Leeman Labs, Inc. not meeting the specifications; and awarding Purchase of One (1) Inductively Coupled Plasma Emission Spectrometer, Specification No. E-190, to Leco Corporation for the delivered price of $122,000.00 plus sales tax for Alternate Bid Item B. See page "C" (b) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 17 to the plans and specifications for Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4, authorizing an addition of $21,626 .00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for four items of additional work. See page "D" (c) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17, authorizing a net addition of $22,378.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for five items of additional work or deletions, and granting a time extension of seven calendar days for completion of said changes. See page "E" -3- 6/13/90 (9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (d) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the electrical equipment purchase contract with Cooper Industries, Energy Services Group, dba C-B Reciprocating, for Purchase of Spark-Ignited Engines for Use in Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19A, authorizing an additional $10,000.00 to upgrade all eight engines with new computer controls, increasing the contract amount from $20,658,245.00 to an amount not to exceed $20,668,245.00; extending the date for delivery of the heat recovery equipment from June 30, 1990 to September 1, 1990; and extending the date for delivery of spare parts from June 4, 1990 to August 1, 1990. See page F. (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for warehouse and Maintenance Building and Oil Storage and Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20, authorizing a net addition of $16,528. 34 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for six items of additional work or deletions. See page "G" (f) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 37965 issued to Sur-Lite Corporation for Purchase of Five Waste Digester Gas Flares, Job No. J-21A, decreasing the number of waste gas flares purchased from five to four, and the total authorized amount from $284,216 .00 to $239,400.00, plus sales tax. (g) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 29 to the plans and specifications for Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20 , and Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts; and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31, authorizing an addition of $130,821.95 to the contract with Riewi'c Pacific Co. for 13 items of miscellaneous modifications and additions. See page "H" (h) Consideration of the following actions relative to Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-2: (1 ) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said protect, authorizing an addition of $104,883 .45 to t:ie contract with Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. for one item of additional work to accommodate Souclern California Edison Company and City of Huntington Beach improvements. See page "I" [ITEM (9) (h) CONTINUED ON PAGE 5] -4- 6/13/90 (9 ) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (h) (2) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specification for said project, authorizing an addition of $132,628.20 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. for one item of additional work for compatibility with new Central Power Generation Systems project. See page ^J" (i) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 8 to the plans and specifications for Miscellaneous Modifications and Improvements to Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-37, authorizing an addition of $29,190.00 to the contract with Ziebarth 6 Alper for ten items of additional work. See page "K^ (j ) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Lee and So Consulting Engineers for design and construction services required for Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33, to provide for additional construction support services. (k) Consideration of the following actions relative to the Professional Services Agreement with James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers, Inc. to conduct astudy of user categories for establishing rates for Districts' one-time connection fees and annual use fees: (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for said services. See page "L" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-54, approving said agreement with James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers, Inc. for said services, on an hourly-rate basis fcr labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $89 ,549 .00. See page ^M" (1) Consideration of the following actions relative to Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Martin %ordick, Sr. for specialized construction inspection services re various master-planned construction projects, providing for extension of said agreement and increasing the hourly rate: (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file end.. approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee `.' for said additional services. See page 'N' [ITEM (9) (1) CONTINUED ON PAGE 61 -5- 6/13/90 (9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (1) (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-55, approving said Addendum No. 1 to said agreement with Martin Rordick, Sr. , extending said agreement for construction inspection services, on an as-needed basis, for a two-year period beginning August 10, 1990, at the increased hourly rate of $40.00 for the first year and $42.50 for the second year, plus mileage reimbursement for on-the-job travel. See page ^0^ (m) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny claim of Emmanuel Ojo dated April 30, 1990, in the amount of $553.32 for alleged damage to his vehicle while parked on the perimeter road next to the Santa Ana River at Plant No. 1, and refer to the Districts' General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. (n) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to employ Dr. Y. J. Shan in the classification of Senior Engineer, at the salary of $5377/month, to work in the Districts' Operations Division. (o) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to designate members of the Boards and/or staff to attend and participate in meetings, hearings, conferences facility inspections and other functions which, in his opinion, will be of value to the Districts or affect the Districts' interests, including, but not limited to, those conducted by state and federal legislative and regulatory bodies and the California Association of Sanitation Agencies, California Water Pollution Control Association, Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, and the Water Pollution Control Federation; and authorizing reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses in accordance with existing Districts' policies and the approved annual budget for 1990-91. DISTRICT 2 (p) Consideration of the following actions relative to Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and Lampson Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2, and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road between Euclid Street and walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27: (1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 7 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of $56,773.00 to the contract with W. H. Ebert Corp. for nine items of additional wry and granting a time extension of 12 calend, -, days for completion of said additional work. See page P. [ITEM (9) (p) CONTINUED ON PAGE 7] -6- 6/13/90 (9) DISTRICT 2 - (CONSENT CALENDAR CONTINUED) (p) (2) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 8 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a net addition of $270,519 . 30 to the contract with W. H. Ebert Corp. See page "Q" (3) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-59-2, accepting said project as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. See page "R" (q) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-60-2, approving plans and specifications for Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, Between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-3; Katella Relief Sewer, Between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-28; and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. See page "S" (r) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-61-2, approving Agreement with Kraemer Imperial Associates relative acceptance of new Grant of Easement in connection with a realigned portion of the Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9, (Realignment entitled Contract No. 2-9A) ; and approving and authorizing execution of a Corporation Quitclaim Deed, quitclaiming the District's interest in a portion of the original sewer line and easement therefor from Kraemer Imperial Associates. See page „T„ (s) Consideration of the following actions relative to collection of unpaid connection fees: See page "U" ( 1) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Counsel to file a complaint in the Municipal Court seeking recovery of unpaid sewer connection fees in the amount of $7,038.00 from Banco Development. (1 ) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Counsel to file a complaint in the Municipal Court seeking recovery of unpaid sewer connection fees in the amount of $11,593.81 from Bristol Lane Associates . -7- 6/13/90' (9 ) DISTRICT 3 - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (t) Consideration of the following actions, pursuant to the Boards- redevelopment agency tax increment policy, relative to the Cypress Redevelopment Agency Los Alamitos Race Track and Golf Course Redevelopment Project and the Lincoln Avenue Redevelopment Project: (1 ) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from GRC Redevelopment Consultants, Inc. dated April 11, 1990 proposing said pass-through. See page "y" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-62-3, approving Agreement with Cypress Redevelopment Agency, re pass-through of historical, proportional annual tax increment to District relative to the Los Alamitos Race Track and Golf Course Redevelopment Project. See page "W" ( 3) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-63-3, electing a tax increment pass-through, pursuant to Section 33676 of the Health and Safety Code, relative to the Lincoln Avenue Redevelopment Project. See page I.W. DISTRICT 5 (u) Consideration of the following actions relative to South Coast Trunk Sewer, Phase I, Contract No. 5-35-1: (1) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project, making miscellaneous technical and traffic control clarifications. (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-64-5, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for said project to W. H. Ebert Corp. in the total amount of- $880,066.00. See page "1." (v) Consideration of motion approving Memorandum of Understanding with The Irvine Company re construction of Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-34-3. See page nZ" -8 � 6/13/90 (9) DISTRICTS 7 & 14 - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (w) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny amended claim of Southern California Edison Company dated May 18, 1990 (original claim in an estimated amount dated 4/13/90 never received and filed) in the amount of $4,328.74 for alleged damages to a 12,000 volt line incurred during construction of Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road (and City of Costa Mesa street improvements) , Contract No. 14-1-1B, and refer to the Districts, General Counsel, liability claims administrator, contractor and contractor's insurance company for appropriate action. DISTRICT 7 (x) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-65-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex 2.50 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the southeast corner of the intersection of Lemon Heights Drive and Lower Lake Drive in unincorporated County territory (proposed Annexation No. 135 - Williams Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7) . See page "AA" END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consi�ion of action on items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any L.� -9- 6/13/90'_ - `- (11 ) ALL DISTRICTS NOmina ons for Joint Chairman (Election t0 be held at regular July Board Meeting) (12) ALL DISTRICTS Consign of motion to receive, file and approve staff Summary Financial Report for nine-month period ending March 31, 1990 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) (13) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of the following actions relative to NPDES Ocean Monitoring Program: (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Report and Recommendation for NPDES Ocean Monitoring Program Year Six (1990-91) and Selection Committee Certification of the negotiated fee for Amendment No. 7 to Agreement with Science Applications International Corporation (SAIL) for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. 5-032 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) . (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-56, approving Amendment No. 7 to the Agreement with SAIC for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-Inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. 5-032, extending the contract from July 1, 1990 to June 30, 1991, for an amount not to exceed $1,821,365.00 for the sixth year of said contract. See page "BB" (14) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Report of the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee's actions and written report of the meeting on May 31, 1990 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) . (b) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager and General Counsel to negotiate with property owners for acquisition of a site or sites for a water reclamation facility in the general vicinity of the Anaheim Forebay based upon appraisals for such property. -10- 6/13/90 (15) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Report of the Executive Committee and Fiscal Policy Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file r.� and approve the Committees' actions and written report of the meeting on May 23, 1990 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) . (b) Consideration of action on items recommended by said Committees: (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file the Committees' report and recommendations re 1990-91 personnel requirements and joint works operating and construction budgets. (2) Consideration of actions re personnel requirements: (a) Consideration of motion approving 1990-91 personnel requirements (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-57, amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, re 1990-91 personnel requirements (3) Roll call vote motion approving proposed 1990-91 Joint Operating Budget Funds, as follows: Fund Total Amount Joint Operating/Working Capital $50,207,000 Workers' Compensation Self-Insured 218,000 Self-Funded Health Plan Trust 1,264,000 Public Liability Self-Insured 329,000 (4) Roll call vote motion approving proposed 1990-91 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget (CORP Joint Works Construction) in the total amount of $103,422,000. (5) Consideration of motion authorizing and directing the Fiscal Policy Committee to evaluate proposals obtained by the Districts' insurance broker and to place Excess. Workers' Compensation insurance coverage effective July 1, 1990; said action to be submitted to the Joint Boards for ratification or revision at the regular meeting on July 11, 1990. (6) Consideration of Resolution No. 90-58, approving Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers to conduct. a foul air treatment optimization study, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $85,000.00. See page "CC" -11- 6/13/•90 (16) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion authorizing the Director of Finance to certify claims and forward to the Orange County auditor for immediate payment for expenditures incurred after June 30, 1990, and declaring that such certification shall comply with the provisions of Resolution No. 76-10 pertaining to procedures for payment of claims against the Districts until the 1990-91 budgets are adopted by the respective Districts. (17) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the proposal of Sonnenschein, Nath & Rosenthal, Attorneys At Law, dated June 6, 1990, for continuation of services of Mr. Lee Paterson, Esq. , now associated with said firm, as special labor counsel for the Districts. See page "DD" (18) ALL DISTRICTS Closed Session: During the course of conducting the usiness se forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards, the Chairman may convene the Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9 or 54957.6. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employee compensation; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as final actions are taken by the Directors on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary (b) Reconvene in regular session (c) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session. (19) ALL DISTRICTS Ot er usiness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (20) DISTRICT 1 Other and communications or supplemozztal agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 1 Con�tion of motion to adjourn -12- 6/13/90 (22) DISTRICT 2 Ot�Fus-iness and communications or supplemental agenda items, 1£ any (23) DISTRICT 2 Con�tion of motion to adjourn (24) DISTRICT 5 Other usiness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (25) DISTRICT 5 Conssi eration of motion to adjourn (26 ) DISTRICT 6 Other usiness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (27) DISTRICT 6 ConsiTe—ration of motion to adjourn (28) DISTRICT 7 Ot er usiness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (29) DISTRICT 7 Con�tion of motion to adjourn ( 30) DISTRICT 13 Other siness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 31) DISTRICT 13 Condon of motion to adjourn ( 32) DISTRICT 14 Other usiness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 33) DISTRICT 14 Condon of motion to adjourn ( 34) DISTRICTS 3 6 11 Consideration the following actions relative to Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for preparation of Phase I Preliminary Project Report for Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17, providing for preparation of plans and specifications and construction support services: (a) verbal staff report (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated June 5 , 1990 re Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements. See page "EE" (b) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit a proposal and negotiate Addendum No. 1 to said agreement with John Carollo Engineers for L said additional services. -13- 6/137504'- ( 35) DISTRICT 3 Ot—he�iness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 36) DISTRICT 3 �. Con�tion of motion to adjourn ( 37) DISTRICT 11 Ot er siness and communications or supplemental agenda Stems, if any ( 38) DISTRICT 11 Conssi eraEion of motion to adjourn -14- MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127•10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County, California Fountain Valley,CA 9272MI27 Telephone:(714)962-2441 �.r JOINT BOARDS Vesting Date June 13, 1990 at 7:30 p.m. The following is a brief explanation of the maze important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting. ALL DISTRICTS 9(a) : AWAED PURCHASE OF INDUCTIVELY COUPIED PIASSMA (ICP) EMISSION SPECPROMEPER, SPECIFICATION NO. E-190. The Districts' laboratory staff provides analytical determinations of various chemical constituents in wastewater and sludge samples for determining caupliance with NPDPS ocean discharge permit and sauce control orrlinamv requi raments, Analyses for metals are currently performed using atomic absorption (AA) spectrometers, with confirmation on a limited percentage of sample splits performed using an inductively coupled plasma (ICP) spectrarater by an catside laboratory. In order to increase capacity and allow the most economical analysis of all source control samples by both AA and ICP, thereby increasing confidence in results when determining carpliance of industrial dischargers, staff has solicited bids for purchase of an ICP emission spectrometer. Due to space limitations within the existing laboratory, technical specifications included a size limitation specifying a benchtcp instrument. Two manufacturers of instruments meeting this size Limitation submitted bids of $121,675.00 and $122,000.00 excluding sales tax. The IECO Corporation instrument meets all specifications. However, the instrmnent manufactured by the apparent low bidder, Leeman Labs, Inc., fails to meet Technical Specification IV.B.7 requiring a completely solid-state radio frequency (RF) generator. The presence of a power tube in the Leeman instrument RF generator represents a significant potential for lower reliability and higher maintenance cost versus the totally solid-state LEM Corporation instrument RF generator which meets the specification. In addition, the LECO instrument exceeds the one-year warranty specification by providurg a two-year warranty. An optional ultrasonic nebulizer, bid by each manufacturer at $15,000.00, is useful to achieve better detection limits but not required at this time. June 13, 1990 Staff therefore recmmends that the bid from Leaman labs, Inc., be rejected for not meeting specifications and that award for Specification No. �..i E-190 be made to LEM Corporation, the lowest bidder meeting specifications for Bid Alternate Bid Item B, in the amount of $122,000.00, plus sales tax. A copy of the bid tabulation and recanrendation is attached to the supporting agenda documents. 9(b): APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 17 TO ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION, JOB NO. J-7-4. Job No. J-7-4, Administration Building Addition, includes the construction of an administration building addition and remodeling of the existing administration building, addition of two new parking areas and associated work at a cost of $3.9 million. Change Ogler No. 17 adds $21,626.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation. Item 1 directed the Contractor to furnish and install a new fire alarm system to serve the Administration Building. The fire alarm system was required by the City of Fountain Valley Fire Department and was not included in the contract. The fire alarm system added a cost of $10,841.00 to the contract. Item 2 resulted in an additional cost of $4,904.00 to modify the heating system in the New South Wing to provide heat to Conference Room A. Item 3 relocated the heating and ventilating system air compressor and air dryer out of the existing Adm nistraUm Building Elevator Equipment Room No. 134 to an adjacent roam. This item of work was required by the State of California Department of Industrial Safety Elevator Division at an additional cost of $3,439.00. Item 4 was a cost of $2,442.00 for the Contractor to perform a variety of electrical changes in the New South Wing and the Chiller Building. These changes included adding and wiring a new landscaping sprinkler controller, wiring electric door latches and adding light fixtures. The above-described changes are considered by staff to be corrections which would have been included in the original design if discovered or known prior to its completion. None of the items are for replaced woik. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 17 adding $21,626.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation. There is no time extension associated with this change order. 9(c): APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17. Job No. J-17, Central laboratory, provides for the construction of a new laboratory and includes an addition of utilities to serve the new facility, site paving, and provision for additional parking at a cost of $7,090,000.00. Change Order No. 1 is a net addition of $22,378.00 and seven calendar days to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation. Item 1 directed the contractor to furnish and install woven fabric over the entire bottom area of the foundation excavation. The soil condition found during excavation was less substantial than the prebid borings indicated. The Districts' soils consultant recon ended fabric as the most economical way to -2- June 13, 1990 stabilize existing marginal soils. This item resulted in an additional cost of $20,832.00 and a time extension of seven calendar days. Item 2 revises the building hardware schedule adding and deleting a number of hardware items for a net additional cost of $587.00. Item 3 resulted is a credit of $1,155.00 to change the pipe material in the restroans from contract-specified extra heavy weight cast iron pipe to standard weight cast iron pipe commonly used in this type of construction. The extra-duty material was not available. Item 4 directed the contractor to change the finishes on the elevator and trim from baked enamel to a more durable brushed stainless steel at the request of the project architect. This item resulted in an additional cost of $2,114.00. Item 5 is a no cost change for deleting a 120-day liquidated damage clause in the contract for completion of site work and underground utilities. Because of delays in determining the installation of underground utilities, the Districts and the contractor agreed it would be mutually beneficial to postpone the work until later in the contract. The above-described changes are considered by staff to be corrections which world have been included in the original design if discovered or known prior to its completion. Now of the items are for replaced work. Staff recamends approval of Change Order No. 1 for a net addition of $22,378.00 and seven calendar days to the contract with J. R. Roberts corporation. 9(d) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO PURCHASE OF.SPARK-IGNITED ENGINES FOR USE IN CENTRAL POWER GEN =CN SYSTRE, JOB NO. J-19A. Job No. J-19A is a $20.7 million contract with Cooper Industries to supply eight large engine-generating sets for the new $65.0 million Central Power Generation Systems at both treatment plants. The manufacture of the engines, generators and auxiliary equipment is near completion and the first of the two facilities to house the power plants is now under construction. Change Order No. 1 adds $10,000.00 and extends certain delivery schedules. The engines will use secondary treated wastewater (effluent) for cooling water which could enter the engine combustion areas and cause damage if the cooling coils fail. To attenuate this possibility, a supplemental cooling loop and pimp have been designed. This change will provide control for this system by the computer being purchased under this contract. The additional cost to upgrade is $10,000.00 for all eight engines. Due to delays in approving heat recovery equipment and controls, a time extension of 63 days, to September 1, 1990, extending the goal for delivery of this material has been requested. The original contract and Ame[rtment No. 3 required delivery of this equipment 506 days after receipt of the Notice to Proceed, or June 30, 1990 (one of the many delivery goals). This additional delay for delivery of the heat recovery and control equipment will have no effect on the facility currently under construction at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-19-2. Cooper Industries has also requested an extension of 58 days for delivery v of the specified spare parts for the Central Power Generation Systems. The original contract required delivery by June 3, 1990, The extension will require delivery by August 1, 1990, and will have no effect on. current construction of Job No. J-19-2, or on the maximum contract time. -3- June 13, 1990 Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $10,000.00 to the purchase contract providing for the above recommended changes and increasing the contract from $20,658,245.00 to an amount not to exceed $20,668,245.00, and the above-described time extensions. 9(e): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 TO WAREHOUSE AND MAIR NANCE BUILDING. AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING IDTROVEMERM, JOB NO. J-20. Job No. J-20, Warehouse and Maintenance Building, and Oil Storage and Dispensing improvements, includes the construction of eight warehouse and maintenance buildings, remodeling of the existing oil storage facility and site paving, at= drain and fire protection systems at a cost of $3.4 million. Change Order No. 5 is a net addition of $16,528.34 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation. item 1 directed the Contractor to change the type of building insulation to be installed in the open ceiling areas of three new buildings to a foil-faced fire rated type. The un£aced type of insulation specified in the contract world have resulted in fiberglass dust constantly falling on Districts' personnel working below the unfinished ceilings, creating an unhealthy working environment. This item resulted in an additional cost of $9,852.00. Item 2 resulted in an additional cost of $3,459.00 to construct new fencing and gates to secure the auto shop compound upon completion of the new structures. The contract drawings and specifications did not include new, fencing and service access gates for the auto shop compound. Item 3 added a dishwasher including plumbing in the new lunchroom in Building No. 6, at a cost of $1,247.00. Item 4 directed the Contractor to add a new electrical terminal bus bar to the electrical power panel inside the existing Electric/Instrument Shop "A" The bus bar was added in order to provide space to connect new electrical power cables to serve new Maintenan a Buildings "5" and "6". The additional cost of furnishing and installing the bus bar added $1,809.00 to the contract. Item 5 changes the contract-specified floor sealer to a combination floor hardener and penetrating sealer for all the new warehouse building concrete floors for better wear. This item added $2,888.00 to the contract. Item 6 is a credit of $2,726.66 from the contract for abandonment of an existing 6-inch city water line crossing the North Road, required by the City of Fountain Valley. The work was performed by another contractor to expedite completion of the water system revisions. The above-described changes are considered by staff to be corrections which would have been included in the original design if discovered or known prior to its completion. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 5 for a net addition of $16,528.34 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation. There is no time extension associated with this change order. 91E1: APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO PURCHASE ORDER NO. 37965 WITH SUR-ISTE CORPORATION FOR PURCHASE OF FIVE WA= DIGESTER GAS FIARFS, JOB NO. J-21A. In February 1989 the Directors authorized staff to issue a purchase order to Sur-Lite Corporation for the fabrication and installation of five waste digester gas flares, one at Plant No. 2 and four at Plant No. 1, for an amount not to exceed $284,216.00, plus sales tax. No payment was due until the Permit -4- June 13, 1990 to Construct (Plan) was issued by South Coast Air Quality Management District v (SCAQMD). The price included a discount of $3,000.00 per flare because five or more flares were purchased. In April the PIC was received. During the 14-month SCAQMD permitting period, it was determined by SCAM that only two flares would be permitted for operation at Plant No. 1. One additional flare will be allowed for standby. Thus, only four flares will be manufactured and installed instead of the five originally contracted. Sur-Lite, because of the reduced quantity, SCAQM7 permitting time delays and cost increases, will not provide the $3,000.00 par unit volume discount. Staff believes the lost discount which now essentially amounts to a $3,000.00 fabrication increase (6% over 14 months) is reasonable. The recamands action is to authorize the General Manager to issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 39765, decreasing the number of flares from five to four and the total purchase order amount from $284,216.00 to an amount not to exceed $239,400.00, plus sales tax. 9(g) ; APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 29 70 BEADWORRS NO. 2 AT PIANP NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-20; AND DEPALPITCN OF DIGESTERS NOS. 1, 2 AND 4; REPfFGQ�D II' OF BOILER; PIPING CLEANOUTS; AND GRADING AND PAVING AT PLANr NO. 2, JOB NO. P1-31. Job No. P1-20, Beadworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1 and Job No. P1-31, Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cleanouts; and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, includes the construction of a new 140 million gallon per day influent pimping plant and preliminary treatment facilities at a cost of $33.8 million. Change Order No. 29 adds 13 items of work and $130,821.95 to the contract. Item 1, in the amount of $9,138.00, provides for modifications and additions to the hot water circulation system at the new boiler and a lighting relocation. These additions and modifications were not shown on the original contract plans and were needed for proper boiler operation. Item 2, in the amount of $13,141.00, provides for modifications to the influent pump seal water system and scrubber recirculation pumps. Additional pressure switches were added to identify seal water failures and to verify flaws within the foul air scrubbers. Item 3, in the amount of $7,593.00, is for the addition of two wet well level indicators at the VFD room in Power Building 3A. These indicators were requested by Operations staff to accomndate manual operation of the influent pumps in the event of a failure in the automatic control system. Item 4, in the amount of $6,251.00, provides for modification to the influent pump system control logic. These modifications were also requested by Operations staff so that the levels of the two pump wet wells could be monitored to eliminate a potential problem of locking out the lag influent pump during a lead pump failure. Item 5 is the addition of an another ground wire at each of the four �.s influent pumps which was required to prevent pump bearing damage from stray ground wire currents flawing between the influent pump and its motor. This ground wire was not shown on the contract drawings and was added to the contract at a cost of $4,985.00. -5- June 13, 1990 Item 6, in the amount of $398.00, provides for modifications to the plant water piping system which conflicted with the installation of stainless steel covers at the existing grit chambers. Item 7, in the amount of $5,112.00, provides for modifications to the chlorine system which were required to facilitate proper operation of the Chlorine Building's safety system in the event of a chlorine leak. Item 8, in the amount of $13,384.00, provides for modification of the structural tie-in at the new inlet channel. The Contractor was directed to revise the location and method of the tie-in of the new inlet channel at the Metering and Diversion Building to avoid a conflict between the contract-specified removable wall panel and the Ellis Avenue trunk line, as the wall had been relocated earlier in the project to avoid a conflict with the Sunflower pump station. Item 9, in the amount of $3,054.00, is for added work at the existing Headworks. After the contract-specified removal of the bar screens, the Districts' Mechanical Maintenance Division requested that the two existing slide gates and one wooden stop gate also be removed as they no longer served a function and could pose a problem in the future if they failed. Item 10, in the amount of $4,571.00, is for revisions to the cover plate support beams at the existing Headworks due to a connection detail conflict on the contract plans. Item 11, in the amount of $5,221.95, is for extra work at the new inlet channel tie-in after the Contractor was directed to evacuate the new inlet channel during an emergency floating of the work area due to a gate failure at the Metering and Diversion Structure on January 17, 1990. Item 12, in the amount of $3,389.00, is for revisions to the Sunflower Pump Station covers. This included installation of hold down anchors on the lower inclined covers to allow individual cover removal which will greatly reduce the time and effort for future maintenance of the lower portion of the pump screws. Item 13, in the amount of $54,584.00, provides for electrical modification at Power Building 3A. This modification provided for an increase of bus duct capacity from 2000 amps to 3000 amps to meet the potential amperage of the newly installed tie bus between the two standby generators. The above-described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. None of the items are for replaced work. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 29 for an addition of $130,821.95 to the contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. There is no time extension associated with this change order. 9(h) APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDERS NOS.1 AND 2 TO SLUDGE HANDLING FArrr•mHES AT RECIAMMON PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-2. This project includes the construction of a new sludge handling and truck loading facility, a new plant water pump station, power distribution building, the construction of a new 12 EV service center and minor improvements to existing sludge handling facilities at Plant No. 1, at a cost of $19,085,000.00. (1) Change Order No. l Change Order No. 1 consists of one item of extra work in the amount of $104,883.45. Change Order No. 1 provides for the construction of an entirely underground 12 KV electrical service in lieu of the partially overhead service specified in the original contract documents. This -6- June 13, 1990 change in the routing of the new electrical service was required to coordinate current construction with future improvements planned by Southern California Edison (SCE) and the City of Huntington Beach at Garfield Avenue. Meetings were held during the design phase of the project which included the design engineer, Districts, staff and SCE. The proposed design was discussed at these meetings and the detailed design was submitted to SCE for review and comment. SCE did not complete its review of the proposed design and make its final determinations for several months and, in fact, not until after the design was complete. The Districts could not hold up the project any longer and proceeded to bid and award the project in August 1989. The above described change is considered by staff to be a design change which would have been included in the original design if knwm prior to completion of the specifications. The change does not include any rework. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 adding $104,883.45 to the contract with Fdvanco Constructors, Inc. There is no time extension associated with this change order. (2) Chance Order No. 2 Change Order No. 2 consists of one item of extra work in the amount of $132,628.00 for modifications to the switchgear. modifications are being made to the new switchgear to rake it compatible with future cogeneration facilities. This project was designed prior to the finial design of the Central Power Generation Systems project and the switchgear change is recommended by the designers of this project and the designers of the Central Power Generation project. If the change is approved, construction dollars will be saved on the Central Power Generation Systems project by avoiding installation of additional switchgear. The above described change is considered by staff to be a design change which would have been included in the original design if known prim: to its completion. The change does not include any rework. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 adding $132,628.20 to the contract with Pdvanco Constructors, Inc. There is no time extension associated with this change order. 9(i): APPROVAL OF CHANCE ORDER NO. 8 TO MISCELLANE'UDS MODIFICATIONS AND DOROVEMEN S 7O FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLANP NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-37. This $5.7 million project includes 38 items of non-related rehabilitation and correctional work. larger items of work include replacement of the dames on Digesters "A" and "B", replacement of two influent pumps at Headworks "C", the installation of prepurchased barscreens at Headworks "C", replacement of grit augers, screening conveyors, chlorine system piping and waste activated sludge pumps, new primary influent flow meters, sheds for electric cart storage and bypass waste activated sludge piping. Change Order No. 8 provides for ten items ..r of change and adds a net of $29,190.00 to the contract. -7- June 13, 1990 " Item 1, in the amount of $2,430.00 provides for the fabrication and installation of two new, sluice gate operator supports at Pflanz Headw ks to replace those not suitable for reuse due to size and condition of materials. Item 2, in the amount of $9,629.00 provides for the installation of additional pipe, fittings and valves in digester gas piping at the roof of Digester "A" and "B" pup room to facilitate the future installation of gas compressors. Item 3, in the amount of $775.00, provides for the venting of chlor-alert alarm panels to pent sampling mechanisms to function properly. Item 4, in the amunt of $4,194.00, provides for changes in concrete walkway details to accamudate changes in the location of the Raw Sewage Power Building. Item 5, a credit in the amount of $6,224.00, deletes the installation of polymer storage tank level controls and mass flow meters for ferric chloride dosing systems. Item 6, in the amount of $5,460.00, provides for the relocation of existing ferric chloride facility process piping and drains to eliminate interferences with the construction of the new Conveyor Building. Item 7, in the amount of $468.00, provides for electrical power circuitry for chlorine solution rotometers in Rollins Tunnel that was inadvertently caitted from the plans. Item 8, in the amount of $4,527.00, provides for the relocation of VFD reactors at both waste activated pump control rams to meet electrical equipment clearance requirements called for in the code. Item 9, in the amount of $2,596.00, provides for the removal of the orifice type flow meters in the two chlorine solution lines at the chlorination facility to eliminate chlorinator malfunction.nct;on. Item 10, in the amount of $5,335.00, provides for the replacement of portions of the existing belt press washwater piping that was too deteriorated for reuse at propeller meter installations The above described change is considered by staff to be a correction which would have been included in the original design if discovered or known prior to its cmpletion. Staff recovends approval of Change Order No. 8 adding $29,190.00 to the contract. No time extension is associated with this change. 9(7): AUTHORIZING THE SELECTION CU44r EE TO NEIX7PIATE ADDENDW NO. 3 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGRE07Wr WITH LEE AND RO CONSULTING ENGMERS FOR PRIMARY CLARIFIERS NOS. 6-15 AND MKIATEn FACILrMR.S AT RECL�ON PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-33. In January 1988, the Directors approved a professional services agreement with lee and Ro Consulting Engineers to prepare plans and specifications for 60 mgd of new primary clarifiers and related facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1. The project is now, under construction, at a cost of approximately $40.0 million. The fast-paced project is requiring more construction support services by the consultant than envisioned when the design contract was awarded. Add'.tional time has been required for consultation and clarifications, review of the cmplex systems, shop drawing submittals, continuing support requested by the construction management team including site visits and attending bi-wa- y coordination meetings, additional as-huilt drawings, preparation of an amendment to the operations and maintenance manual, and start-up training. Staff recommends that U- Selection Cmmittee be authorized to negotiate Addendum No. 3 for the additional engineering services for constriction support services anticipated through the remainder of the construction phase `✓ (approximately 22 months). Following the Selection Cmmittes's negotiations, the proposed addendum will be presented to the Boards for consideration. -8- June 13, 1990 9(k) : RECEIVE AND FILE SELECPION COMrtITi'EE CERTIFTCATiON AND APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREDEW FOR USER AND COMMOTION FEE STUDY WITH JAMES M. MUMMERY CONSULTING ENGMERS. With the exception of Districts Nos. 7 and 14, all Districts now have in place an annual user charge collected on the tax bill. (District 7 will implement such a fee in 1991-92 and District 14 is financed by IM.) The user fee supplements tax revenues used to finance operating, maintenance and replacement costs. In the future, user fees will also pay for debt service. In addition, all Districts, with the exception of District No. 14, charge fees for the connection of new development to the Districts' sewerage facilities. Connection fees are used to pay for capital facilities needed to service the new developrent. The annual user fee and the one-time development connection fee charges are currently based on limited land use designations. The user fee is based on three categories: a separate flat fee for single family dwellings, and multiple family dwellings; and a square footage charge for non-residential properties. The connection fee has two categories; a flat fee for residential dwellings; and a square footage charge for non-residential buildings. During public hearings on fees there has been considerable comment on the equitability of the fee structures and suggestions that the categories be expanded, which staff believes has some marit. Staff has, therefore, proposed a study to determine if the charges could be more equitable by expanding the categories. Certain types of uses might pay less on the annual use charge and others might pay more. The additional use designations could have to be compatible with the Assessor's database program which was recently modified to better accommodate multiple fee categories as well as make economic and engineering sense. Proposals have been solicited and the Selection Comnittee has negotiated a professional services agreement with James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers Inc. to conduct the study for an amount not to exceed $89,549.00, based on hourly rates plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants fees and fixed profit. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and adoption of a resolution approving the Professional Services Agrean nt with James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers Inc. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the supporting agenda documents. 9(1) : RECEIVE AND FILE SELECTION CCK4rTPEE CE1i=CATION AND APPROVE ADDENDUM ND. 1 TO PROFFSSICNAL SERVICES AGFOU24Ef FUR CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SERVICES WITH M4 M KORDICK. SR. The Directors have previously authorized the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate professional services agreements for speciality consulting services necessary to assist in the construction management of various master-planned projects. Under that authority, several consultants have been retained, individually or through firms, to assist staff in the management and inspection of the largest construction effort in the Districts' history. The Districts currently have some $220 million in work under construction at the Joint Treatment Works and in the individual District's collection systems. -9- June 13, 1990 In August 1988, the Directors approved a two-year agreement with Martin Kor.ii„k, Sr. to assist the construction management team with inspection and contract administration of various District's collection system projects. Mr. Rordick has provided excellent assistance with the many on-going projects, as well as acting as the Districts' representative to the various agencies involved in the construction projects. Staff believes that Mr. Kordick's services will continue to be required on planned collection system projects. The Selection Committee has negotiated Addendum No. 1 with Martin Koxdick, Sr. to extend the professional services agreement for two years, on an as-needed basis, at the following rates: First year - $40.00 per hour; second year - $42.50 per hour. The existing rate is $37.50 per hour. The agreement also includes mileage reimbursement at the approved IRS rate. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee certification of the negotiated hourly rates, and adoption of a resolution approving Addendum No. 1 to the professional services agreement with Martin Kordick, Sr. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the supporting agenda docmients. 9(m): RECEIVE, FILE AND DENY CfAIM SUB IIWED BY EMARINUEL WO FOR ALLEGED VERICLE DAMAGE WHILE PARKED ON DISTRICTS' PROPERTY. The Districts have received a claim from employee Emmanuel Ojo dated April 30, 1990, for alleged damages to his vehicle. Mr. Ojo claims that his vehicle was struck while parked on the Plant No. 1 East Perimeter Road next the the Santa Ana River. The amount of the claim is $553.32. The routine action appearing on the agenda is to receive, file and deny the claim and refer it to the District's liability claims administrator and General Counsel for appropriate action. 9(n) : AUrHORIZING EMPLOYMENT OF DR. Y. J. SHAD AS SENIOR EWI EER. The Operations Division is responsible for around-the-clock plant operations and compliance with air and water quality regulations. To assist in accomplishing these tasks, the division employs several engineers as Senior (process) Engineers ($4106/5337 per month) . The inam -mt process engineer resigned several months ago. We have been recruiting to fill this position for some time. After screening the applicants, four individuals were intervieeed. Twv highly qualified candidates were selected. One has withdrawn from further consideration. The candidate who was selected for the position has excellent qualifications by virtue of schooling (PhD) and experience (23 years with 12 years in wastewater treatment). He is highly qualified in the follad ng areas: - Bachelor's degree in Chemical Engineering - M.S. and Ph.D. in Civil/Sanitary Engineering - Extensive experience in chemical application in wastewater plants - Extensive experience in operating secondary plants above the design capacity - Teaching and staff training experience - Author of technical articles - Has performed EPA-funded research. -10- June 13, 1990 He cones highly recaumnded by Dr. David Jenkins of Berkeley and is very interested in corking for the Districts. However, he is currently making more than the Districts' staff is authorized to offer (mid-point of the salary range) . Staff is therefore requesting authorization to employ Dr. Y. J. Shao as a Senior Engineer at a salary of $5,337.00 per month. 9(o): GDEMM AUTHORIZATION FOR ATTENDANCE OF PERSONNEL AND DIRECTORS AT [EE= IN 1990-91. on an annual basis the General Manager is routinely authorized to designate members of the Board and/or staff to attend meetings, conferences, etc. which he believes will be of value to the Districts. Such attendance is in accordance with the existing Districts' travel and expense reimbursement policies and the approved annual budget. It is recnmended that this authorization be renewed for 1990-91. DISTRICT 2 9(p): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDERS N(S. 7 AND 8 TO PORTION OF EUCLID INIERCEPTOR SEWER, BETWEEN EDII4GE2 AVENUE AND IAMPSON AVENUE, COVIRACf NO. 2-26-2, AND SOUTH ANAHEIM RELIEF SEWER, ON BALL ROAD BETWEEN EUCLID STREET AND WA= STREET, CLNTRPCr NO. 2-27 AND ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT AS COMPLETE. This $9.8 million project is the installation of vitrified clay and reinforced concrete gravity sewer relief lines. Contract No. 2-26-2, Portion of the Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and Lampson Avenue, and Contract No. 2-27, the South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, in the total amount of $9.6 million, are located within the Cities of Garden Grove, Santa Ana, Fountain Valley and Anaheim. The contract is now complete. (1) Change Order No. 7 Change Order No. 7, in the amount of $56,773.00 consists of nine items. Item 1, in the amoumt of $9,103.00, is for a change in the traffic detour plan at the intersection of Euclid Street and McFadden Avenue to provide for safe passage around a large excavation for southboud traffic on Euclid Street. Item 2, in the amount of $5,941.00, is for the removal of an old railroad crossing which was found to conflict with the sewer alignment. This occurred when the alignment had to be changed because the City of Carden Grove could not provide the promised right-of-gray. Item 3, in the amount of $15,912.00, provides for equipment standby charges caused by a delay in Southern California Gas Co. 's relocation of a 3-inch gas main on Nelson Street. Item 4, in the amount of $16,460.00, is for extra cork required because of undisclosed utilities at various locations found while excavating for the new sewer line. Item 5, in the amount of $1,935.00, provides for the necessary removal of undisclosed sub-surface concrete which interfered with the placement of a new manhole. Item 6, in the amount of $1,300.00, is for the installation of air vacuum release valves on a water line that was relocated for excavation and construction of a new sewer line on Taft Avenue. (The added cost was ordered by the City of Garden Grove, and staff will request reimbursement. ) Item 7, for $1,295.00, provides for the bypass of an -11- June 13, 1990 existing 8-inch sewer during the construction of a new sewer line. Floras would not allow for the bypass to be hooked into the new sewer line and V were required to be extended to another manhole. Item 8, in the amount of $ 1,161.00, is the removal and replacement of a 4-inch water line on Nelson Street which was requested by the City of Garden Grave. The District will be reimbursed by the City. Item 9, in the amount of $3,666.00, provides for the removal of two sewer bypasses which were not included in the contract. The bypasses had to be installed under previous contracts and completion of this project now allows the reconnection to the new line. Staff reconuends approval of Change Order No. 7 in the amount of $56,773.00 and an addition of 12 calendar days for completion of the extra work. (2) Chance Order No. 8 Change Order No. 8, in the amount of $270,519.00, is for an adjustment of engineer's quantities for said project. The large overruns were primarily the result of placement of additional base and pavement, particularly on Euclid and Nelson Streets in the cities of Garden Grove and Santa Ana. Staff reccome ds approval of Change Order No. 8 to the contract in the amount of $270,519.00. There is no time extension associated with this change order. (3) Acceptance of Contract as Camnlete W. H. Ebert Corporation has fulfilled all contractual obligations within the specified and earended time. Therefore, staff recannends adoption of the resolution attached to the agenda material, authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the Final Closeout Agreement and filing of the Notice of Cc pletion as required. The final project cost is $10,063,017.30. 9(q): APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PORTION OF EUCLID IINIEFJC@IOR SEWER, COl1RACT NO. 2-26-3, RATELTA REL= SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-28, AND ORANGEWOOD DIVERSION SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-29. In September 1988, the Directors approved a professional services agreement with Willdan Associates to design a Portion of Euclid Interceptor Seiner, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenues, Contract No. 2-26-3, and Eatella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-28. In April 1989, the Directors approved the professional services agreeme.,t with Willdan Associates to design the Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29 which is located on Orangewood Avenue between State College Boulevard and the Santa Ana River. All three of these sewers were identified Li the Master Plan of Trunk Sewers. Three other portions of the Euclid Interceptor have been constructed during the last three years and are now in service. Contract No. 2-26-3 is a portion of the Euclid Interceptor Sewer beginning at Broadway in the City of Anaheim, which is the northerly terminus of Contract No. 2-26, completed in October 1989, and ending on Orangethorpe Avenue at Jefferson Avenue in the City of Fullerton where it ties into the -12- June 13, 1990 FbIlerton-erect Interceptor Sewer, which was completed in February 1988. Tact December the Board of Directors approved a cooperative agreement with the City of Anaheim for the construction of street improvements on Euclid Street between la Palma Avenue and the 91 Freeway, providing for reimbursement of the cost of construction of city improvements. The City improvements will be constructed under Contract No. 2-26-3. The Katella Relief Sewer, Contract No. 2-28, will direct flows to the Euclid Interceptor Sewer from the South Anaheim Sewer between Euclid and Walnut Streets, by constructing about 1/2-mile of sewer. The South Anaheim Sewer is part of the overloaded Neahope-Placentia system. The Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29, will also help to relieve the Newhcpe-Placentia system by diverting flows to the Santa Ana River Interceptor line from State College Boulevard. Staff recommends approval of the plans and specifications for Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-26-3, Katella Relief Sewer, Contract No. 2-28, and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29, and authorization for the General Manager to establish a date for receipt of bids. The engineer's estimate for all of the work is $12 million. 9(r) : AUTHORIZING EKHCMTON OF AN AGREENERr WITS KRAEMER IMPERIAL ASSOCIATES PERTAINING TO REALIGEMU OF A PORTION OF CYPRESS AVENUE SUOrRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-9, INCLUDING EASEMENT EXCHANGE. County Sanitation District No. 2 (CSD 2) owns an easement for the Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9, constructed in the 1960's. Kraemer Imperial Associates, Omer of a parcel recently developed on the south side of Imperial Highway, west of Kraemer Boulevard in the City of Brea, has realigned the sewer within their development, Contract No. 2-9A, at no cost to the District, and granted an easement to the District for the new alignment. Kraemer has requested CSD 2 quitclaim the old easement to them. The recommended action is to authorize execution of an agreement between Krae er Imperial Associates and CSD 2, providing for the transfer of title in the new Line and authorizing execution of a quitclaim deed releasing CSD 2's interest in the old easement. 9(s): AUTHORIZING COLLECTION OF UNPAID CONNECTION FEES FROM SENCO DEVELOPMENT AND BRISTOL LANE ASSOCIATES. Ito developers within the District processed development projects within the City of orange which inadvertently failed to collect connection fees due for the projects. The District staff and the City staff have been in contact with the developers and each of these have refused to make payment of the amounts due and owing for the connection to the District facilities. While the District has a variety of remedies including the ultimate of causing the disconnection, the General Counsel has reconvended that at this time action be taken to file a complaint in the Municipal Court to seek recovery of the unpaid amounts from Banco Development, in the amount of $7,038.00; and Bristol Lane Associates, in the amount of $11,593.81. The General Counsel's recamiendation is attached to the supporting agenda documents. -13- June 13, 1990 DISTRICT 3 9(t): APPROVE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF CITY OF CYPRESS TAX PASS-THROUGH AGREEMENT. The Redevelopment Agency and the City of Cypress have approved development plans over the past several worths for approximately 500 acres within District 3. These plans are known as the Los Alamitos Race Track and Golf Course Redevelopment Project and the Lincoln Avenue Redevelopment Project. Typical redevelopment agency tax increment financing has been proposed for both Project areas. Pursuant to Board policy, staff has corresponded and net with representative of the Redevelopment Agency and their consultant to negotiate for a property tax pass-through. We have agreed to a partial pass-through of the increment of ad valorem taxes. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the letter from GRC Redevelopment Consultants, Inc., consultants to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Cypress, approve an agreement with the agency for pass- through of 35% of the historical District 3 share of the property tax within the Ins Alamitos Race Track and Golf Course Redevelopment Project; and to adopt a resolution electing to capture the 2% annual inflationary increase in taxes allowed by Section 33676 of the Health and Safety Code for the Lincoln Avenue Redevelopment Project. DISTRICT 5 9(u): APPROVAL OF ADDENDUM NO. 1 AND AWARD OF SOUTH COAST TRUNK SEWER, PHASE 1, CQTINACT NO. 5-35-1. In April, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for South Coast Trunk Sewer, Phase 1, Contract No. 5-35-1, the first portion of a new trunk sewer serving the coastal development now in progress at the southeast city limits of Newport Beach. The first phase extends southeast on the inland side of Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) from the Newport Beach city limits to just west of the entrance to the Ins Trancos State Park parking lot. The project is ready to proceed, ahead'of the construction of the intersection of Pelican Hill Road and Pacific Coast Highway. An easement is required for the construction of the s tary sewer and The Irvine Company is dedicating the ease ant at no cost to the District. This project includes approximately 4200 feet of gravity sewer plus manholes and several hundred feet of stubs and laterals for future Connections. (1) Addendum No. 1 Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications to said project clarifies the size and type of the various sewer pipes specified. It clarifies pr,,visions in the detailed specification regarding traffic control and restricted hours of work along Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) . It also adds additional details concerning a new manhole to be used as a temporary pump station for interim use by The Irvine Company (to be paid by The Irvine Company) until after the proposed sewer through Corona del Mar in PCH (Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-34-3) is completed, and it provides for clarifications in the schedule of prices. -14- June 13, 1990 (2) Award of Contract No. 5-35-1 On May 15, eleven bids were received for said project. The bids ranged from a high of $1,384,105.00 to a lox of $880,066.00, submitted by W. E. Ebert Corp. A complete bid tabulation is attached to the supporting agenda documents. Staff recommends award to W. H. Ebert Corp. for their lox bid amount of $880.066.00. The engineer's estimate for this cork was $1,290,000.00. 9(v): APPROVI14G M 40RANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE IRVINE COP@ANY HE HAYSIDE DRIVE TRUNK SEWER, PHASE 3, CONTRAC.r NO. 5-34-3. As the Directors are aware, the development of the south coast area within County Sanitation District No. 5 (CSD 5) requires the construction of new sewer facilities including gravity lines and pump stations. Local sewer service will be provided by the Irvine Ranch Water District (IHWD), but CSD 5 will provide the regional collection, treatment and disposal services. The Directors will also recall that U&M has previously entered into an agreement with CSD 5 providing for prepayment of connection fees and full payment for construction of CSD facilities south of the City of Newport Beach boundary. The remaining facilities to he awarded for construction within the city boundaries include a gravity sewer beginning at Bayside Drive and Marguerite Avenue, extending northeasterly in Marguerite to Pacific Coast Highway and then southeasterly in Pacific Coast Highway to the City boundary. South of the City boundary there will be three separate construction contracts for the sewer facilities to serve the expected 2500 to 3000 dwelling units and cammercial properties. The first of such projects, Contract No. 5-35-1, is being submitted to the Hoard for award under Agenda Item No. 9(u) . The City of Newport Beach, by the adoption of Resolution 88-121, has requested that the District not work in the Corona del Mar commercial area until such time as Pelican Hill Road is open to traffic. Contract No. 5-35-1 will allow construction of the sewer on the north side of PCH prior to the widening of PCH and the construction of PCH/Pelican Hill Road interchange. Between Marguerite Avenue and the south city boundary, the construction of the gravity sewer facilities, generally in the center of Pacific Coast Highway, have been the subject of numerous meetings with Directors, Council members of Newport Beach, staff, utility companies, the Chamber of Commerce, the IRND, The Irvine Company, and others. The construction in Pacific Coast Highway will be disruptive to residents and businesses and the purpose of the meetings was to develop measures to minimize that disruption. The plan generally approved by most is to construct the sewer by tunneling in the camiercial zone of Corona del Mar (Marguerite to Poppy Avenue), open cutting in the shallaest area of Pacific Coast Highway (generally Poppy Avenue to Cameo Highlands Drive), and tunneling in the deep areas south to the City boundary. A memorandum that sets forth the basic understanding (M7U) between The Irvine Company and the City of Newport Beach pertaining to the construction of the sewer in PCH has been drafted. It includes an accelerated construction period within the cmmercial area, but precludes construction between November 1 and January 1, during the holiday season. The Irvine Company commits to pay for the interim mcdifi.cations of the CSD 5 Corona del Mar Pump Station to provide for temporary service to the developing properties (the pump station will be -15- June 13, 1990 abandoned when all of the projects are completed) . The FDU has been proposed by The Irvine Company and Director Sansone, who represents the Corona del Mar area �../ on the City Council, to assure affected parties of the intent of the proposed construction of improvements to Bayside Drive Truk Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-34-3. DISTRICTS 7 AND 14 9(w) : FWMIVE, FILE AVID DENY AMENDED CLAIM SUBMITTED BY SOUTHFISI CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY. The Districts have received an amended claim (the original claim has not been received and filed) from Southern California Edison Carpany dated May 18, 1990, for a 12,000 volt line that allegedly fused in connection with construction of Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road (and City of Costa Mesa Street Improvements), Contract No. 14-1-1B. The amount of the claim is $4,328.74. The routine action appearing on the agenda is to receive, file and deny the claim and refer it to the Districts' General Counsel, liability claims administrator, contractor and contractor's insurance company for appropriate action. DISTRICT 7 9(x) : INITIATE PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION] NO. 135 - WILLIAMS Ab MXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7. In February the Directors received a petition from Mr. and Mrs. Donald R. Williams to annex 2.50 acres located in the vicinity of the southeast corner of the intersection of Lemon Heights Drive and Inwer Lake Drive in unincorporated County territory. There is one residence under construction, with the possibility of another in the future for this parcel. The annexation would be in accordance with the terms of the negotiated AB 8 tax exchange agreement with the County of Orange for annexing properties. The local sewering agency is County Sanitation District No. 7. Staff recamcnds approval of the resolution included with the agenda material initiating proceedings for said Annexation 135 - Williams Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7. ALL DISTRICTS 11: NOMINATIONS FOR JOINT CAN. As provided in the Joint Boards' Rules of Procedures, nominations for Joint Chairman are made at the regular June meeting and the election takes place at the July regular meeting. Nominations and election of the Vice Joint Chairman will be conducted at the July regul& ^neting. For new Direc —'s information, we have included below an excerpt from the current Rules of Prwedures for meetings relative to the election of the Chairman and Vice Cha;ruen of the Joint Administrative Organization. -16- June 13, 1990 T. Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Athministration Organization. "A Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative organization shall be elected by a majority vote of the Districts at the regular meeting in July of each year. The nominations for Joint Chairman shall be made at the regular Board meeting in June each year, and the nominees nay prepare a statement of not more than 100 cords stating their qualifications for the office of Cho=r,man. The statements shall be mailed to members of the Joint Boards of Directors with the agenda and other meeting material for the July regular meeting. "The nominations for Vice Joint Chairman shall be made at the regular Board meeting in July each year and shall be made immediately following the election of the Joint Chairman. "The Chairman and Vice Chairman shall serve at the pleasure of a majority of the Districts. In the event the office of Chairman becomes vacant due to resignation or retirement of the =mnbent prior to the expiration of the regular term, the Vice Chairman shall automatically succeed to the office of the Chairman and shall continue to serve through the remainder of the regular term unless sooner removed by action of a majority of the Districts. In the event the office of Vice Chairman becomes vacant prior to the expiration of the regular term, nominations and the election of a Director to sere in that capacity shall be conducted at the next regular Board meeting. The person so elected shall serve the balance of the regularly scheduled term unless sooner removed as a result of action by a majority of the Districts." 12: Fn*2ZIAL REPORT FOR NINE-MMM PERIOD ENDING MARCH 31, 1990. Enclosed are the budgetary financial statements for the third quarter of the fiscal year. The Joint Cperating Budget was reviewed by the Fiscal Policy Committee on May 16, 1990. If any Director has questions pertaining to the statements, please call Gary Streed, Director of Finance at (714) 962-2411, extension 240. 13: APPROVING YEAR 6 NPDFS OCEAN M7NMRI14G PROGRAM. As a condition of the existing five-year NPDES mean discharge permit, jointly issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) , the Districts must conduct an extensive monitoring program designed to characterize the effects of our discharge on the ocean environment. In 1985 the Districts issued a Request for Proposals to provide Docent Monitoring Contract Services for the Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. 5-032. After evaluation of seven respondents, the Districts entered into an agreement with Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) to provide these services for the five-year life of the permit, and negotiated a fee for Year 1 (1985-86) in the amount of $916,680.00. Between the initial contract and Year 5 (1989-90) the scope of the monitoring program has been increased significantly to amply with changing EPA requirements. The Year 5 SAIC effort is $1,609,570.00. -17- June 13, 1990 Enclosed with the supporting agenda documents is the report and recamendation of the Selection Committee along with a detailed analysis of the SAIC proposal for Year 6 (1990-91) of the ocean monitoring program. in Year 5 the Districts' staff, with assistance from some other independent outside firms, assumed a part of the monitoring program that had been conducted by SAIC in Years 1-4. This resulted in a considerable cost savings. The proposed Year 6 program shifts these tasks back to SAIC as in Years 1-4 to allow Districts' staff additional time to analyze the data collected. Although the Year 6 SAIC contract is proposed to increase $211,795.00 to a total of $1,821,365.00, the overall monitoring program will decrease $84,777.00, from $1,928,990.00 to $1,844,213.00. 14: REPORT AND RECOM4cLIDATIONS OF THE CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND REUSE The Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee net on May 31, 1990. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on its discussions and recommendations for consideration by the Hoards. 15: REPORT AND RECOM4M=CNS OF FISCAL POLICY AND EXECUPIVE M44 ITIEES. The Fiscal Policy Committee and Executive Camnmi.ttee met jointly on June 20, 1990. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on the committees' deliberations and recamendati.ons. 16: PAYMENT OF cimm9 AFTER xm 30, 1990. The individual District's 1990-91 Budgets will not be adopted until the July Joint Board Meeting and, therefore, it is necessary to have Board authorization for the payment of claims from July 1 to the date of adoption of next year's budgets. It is recommended that this routine action, taken annually, be approved as set forth on the agenda listing. 17: AUPAORIZING CONPINLUMON OF SPECIAL IABOR COUNSEL SERVICES OF ATTORNEY LEE PATEPSON IN ASSOCIATION WITH HIS NEW FIRM. SONNENSCHEIN. NATH & ROSENTHAL. In 1985 the Boards of Directors engaged Mr. Lee Paterson of the law firm Richards, Watson & Gershon to serve as the Districts' special counsel for labor relations. On May 25, Mr. Paterson advised the staff that he is changing his association to a new law firm, Sonnenschein, Nath & Rosenthal, and has asked if we wish to continue his services with his new firm. Mr. Paterson is the lead negotiator in the MDU process (the Districts' current three-year MJUs with our five wplcyee groups expire in November 1990), represents the Districts in labor issue leg..l actions, and also provides related services in other labor relations matters. Stafc believes that Mr. Pate-� is one of the top labor attorneys in the Southland and we believe he also enjoys the confidence of the Directors. Staff, therefore, recommends that the proposal enclosed with the agenda material for continuation of Mr. Paterson's special labor counsel services in *ft.rl . association with his new law firm, Sonnenschein, Nath & Rosenthal, be approved. Mr. Woodruff, the Districts' General Counsel, concurs with the recommendation. -18- June 13, 1990 18: AGENDA NOR CIOSED SESSION. From time to time it is necessary for the Boards to convene in closed session to consider purchase and sale of real property, potential or pending litigation, personnel matters or other matters which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Art. In order to avoid a situation where a closed session is needed but does not appear on the agenda, this standing item is placed on the agenda each month providing for a closed session at the regular meeting, if deemed necessary by the Boards. DISTRICTS 3 AND 11 34: AIRMRIZING SE=ON CO[MII= TO SOLICIT A PRCPMU AND MODTIATE ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREQMENf WITH JOHN CAROLIA E=EERS FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCPICN SERVICES RE SLATER AVENUE PUMP S1P.TION SERAM SYSTEM MIROVEMEwS, CUNIRACP NO. 11-17. Enclosed with the supporting agenda material is a separate Staff Report to the Directors of Districts 3 and 11 regarding the proposed Slater Avenue Pump Station System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17. -19- RE; AGENDA ITEM NO. 12 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .1 ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA IDem ewn AXINUE May 21, 1990 - PO.Eon 8IE7 FOUNTAIN VLLLEV.CALIFORNIA 9E729.E121 nuiSw.¢An Joint Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 6 14 of Orange County, California Subjects Summary Financial Report for Nine Months Ended March 31, 1990 Transmitted herewith is the Summary Financial Report for the past nine months ending March 31, 1990, The statements summarize the fiscal activities of the joint operations and the individual Districts for three quarters of the 1989-90 fiscal year and the status of each with respect to the approved budgets. The combined 1989-90 budget for all Districts is $315.7 million, of which approximately 67% is for capital expenditures for facilities improvements and additions, including reserves for said capital projects. The total budgeted revenue and expense categories of the several Districts are set forth below. TABLES 1 COMPARATIVE BUDGET SUMMARY (MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) INCREASE 1989-90 RDOUire ntR 1988.89A 1989-90A CREASE X OF BUDGET JOINT TREATMENT WORKS 0. M & R S 35.9 $ 44.5 S 5.6 14.1% COLLECTION SYSTEM & OTHER DISTRICT 0. M & R 5.5 6.9 1.4 2.2 TREATMENT PLANT CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATIONS 95.0 102.7 7.7 32.5 DISTRICT SEWER CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATIONS 50.6 60.7 10.1 19.2 DEBT SERVICE (G.O. & C.O.P.) 12 6 11.8 (0-8) 3.7 SUBTOTAL $ S M. $ 24_0 71.7X . CONSTRUCTION RESERVES $ 124.5 $ 49.1 S (75.4) 15.6 OTHER RESERVES 38.8 40.0 1_2 12.7 SUBTOTAL 8 163.3 $ 89.1 S (74.2) 28.3% TOTAL REQUIREMENTS $ 365.9 S 115.7 $ (50.2) 100.0X FUNDING CARRY OVER $ 32.0 $ 43.0 $ 11.0 13.6% APPROPRIATED RESERVES 248.0 169.4 (78.6) 53.7 SUBTOTAL $ 28- $ 212.4 $ (67.6) 67, TAX ALLOCATION 0% SHARE) $ 2a i $ 29.7 $ 1.6 9.4 TAX LEVY FOR BOND REDEMPTION 0.6 0.2 (0.4) 0.1 CONSTRUCTION GRANTS 2.7 2.7 --- 0.9 FEES 29.5 49.6 20.1 15.6 INTEREST & OTHER 25.0 21.1 (3.9) 6.7 SUBTOTAL $ 85.9 $ 103.3 $ 17.4 390 TOTAL FUNDING S 365.9 $ 315.7 $ (50.2) 100.0X A ADJUSTED FOR INTER-DISTRICT TRANSACTIONS 030040 FIN/REPORTS90 Page 2 Included in each District's statement is a summary of the above major income and expense categories and an itemization of their trunk sewer construction projects and respective share of the joint works expansion. Authorized general reserves and inter-fund transfers have been excluded from the budget column on said statements as expenditures are not charged directly against such appropriations. Summarized below are comments relative to the financial statements. The statements are presented on an accrual basis and, therefore, inter-district cash transactions for fiscal 1989-90 which were accrued in 1988-89 are not reflected in the year-to-date balances. CASH AND INVESTMENTS Earned interest generated by our continuing program of investing reserve funds (primarily capital funds accumulated for construction of required sewerage facilities) is $13.4 million through three quarters of the year. Virtually 100% of our funds are invested in short-term government securities or time deposits. We presently have our funds invested with the County Treasurer's commingled investment program to take advantage of the higher yields available. JOINT OPERATING FUND This fund accounts for operations, maintenance, and administrative activities relative to the Districts' jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities. The JO expenditures along with the self-funded insurance program costs are monitored by the Fiscal Policy Committee and if some unexpected expenditures are experienced they are reviewed by the Committee. Salaries and Wages - Even though we have had to add employees, there are several authorized but unfilled positions and, thus, considerable payroll savings have been realized to date. Employees' Benefits - Includes Retirement, Workers' Compensation, Unemployment Insurance, Group Medical Insurance and Uniforms. Unemployment insurance and other benefit accounts will continue to recognize considerable savings because of unfilled positions mentioned above under Salaries and Wages. Chargebacks to Districts and CO RF - Payroll expenses are charged back to CORP through the cost accounting system for work on the treatment plants' capital expansion program, and to individual Districts for work on Districts' collection facilities capital expansion projects as well as maintenance and repair of said systems. Also reflects industrial waste division charges to respective Districts. Page 3 Gasoline. Oil & Fuel - Includes all fuel for motor pool. A large portion is recovered through our equipment billing system and included in revenue below. Insurance - Budget amount includes Board and staff out-of-county travel policy, employee fidelity, boiler, fire, earthquake and all risk insurance policies, and pro-rata cost of the self-funded liability insurance program. Expense is in line with annual budget. Memberships - Includes the cost of membership in CASA, AMSA, SARFPA and other organizations. Annual membership costs are recorded when paid. office Expense - This account includes various types of office supplies, stationery and related items. Chlorine and Odor Control Chemicals - Primarily for influent and sludge odor control at treatment plant sites. The main chemicals used to control odors are chlorine and caustic soda. Ferric chloride is used as a supplemental odor control chemical, and caustic soda is also used in air scrubbers throughout the plants to reduce hydrogen sulfide emissions. New air scrubbers have required an increased use of caustic soda. Chemical Coagulants - Expenditures for this item are required to dewater our sludges prior to disposal to comply with Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements. Other Operating Supplies - Miscellaneous items such as solvents, cleaners, janitorial, tools, lab chemicals, etc. purchased throughout the year. Contractual Services - The major elements in this line item are payments for grit and waste-activated sludge removal and disposal at the BEE landfill and payment for off-site sludge removal and reuse. Professional Services - Primarily consists of General Counsel, special labor counsel, audit fees, and miscellaneous consulting services. Printing and Publications - Includes all reproduction activities in-house and with outside services and advertisements for recruitment of staff. Rents and Leases - Equipment Outside Equipment Rental - Primarily for the rental of large cranes and equipment necessary for removing and replacing major pumps, engines and other large equipment during the course of maintenance and repair operations. Page 4 CSDOC Equipment Rental - Reflects the charges for District-owned equipment used for overhead type activities. There is an offsetting credit applied through the cost allocation system for these charges. Repairs and Maintenance - This item, which is for parts and services for repair of plant facilities, reflects an authorization to allow for routine equipment maintenance. Should this level allocation prove to be insufficient in the event of major unexpected equipment failures and/or repairs, a transfer from the unappropriated reserves of the individual Districts would be necessary to meet the increased obligation. Research and Monitoring - Budget includes funds for the ocean monitoring contract required by our NPDES permit. Other projects include operational research and evaluation of processes to develop optimum operating parameters, and also include the Districts' annual share of participation in the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. Travel, Meetings & Training - Major items are authorized by specific Board actions. Expanding activities of regulatory agencies. have required additional staff and Board travel. Utilities - The major item in the Utilities Expense Account is for purchased electrical power. Future expenses are expected to remain within the budget limits, but will increase. Other Expenses - For items not chargeable elsewhere such as freight, safety supplies, etc. Prior Year's Expense - This account is required by the Uniform Accounting System and represents adjustments to an operating or non-operating account balance from the previous year or payment of charges which could not be accrued at year end. Generally, all expenses to this account are recorded in the first quarter. Allocation to Districts and CORE - This is an account established in connection with the cost accounting system and represents materials, supplies, and services overhead chargebacks to the individual Districts and CORP. CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND This fund accounts for the costs of expanding and improving the Districts' jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities and represents an average of 37.9% (including reserves) of each District's budget requirements for 1989-90. During the past nine months, $43.9 million was expended on joint works treatment and disposal facilities improvement and expansion projects. The pro-rata share of joint works improvement and expansion costs is reflected in the financial statements of the respective Districts. Page 5 INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS - The statements reflect the accounting transactions for the nine Districts and include each respective District's share of the Joint Operating Fund and the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund. Taxes: Tax revenue is allocated to two separate accounts: Tax Allocation - This account represents the anticipated allocation of the Districts' pro rata share of the maximum 18 basic property tax allowed under Proposition 13. The Districts average approximately 2.9% ($.029 for each $1.00) of the basic levy. Tax Levy - This account represents tax funds necessary to make voter-approved outstanding general obligation bond principal and interest payments. In accordance with the Jarvis-Gann initiative, tax levies to satisfy these obligations are not restricted. The 1989-90 levy was waived for District 7, and debt service is being financed by interest on reserve funds. Federal and State Construction Grants - EPA and SWRCB have historically funded up to 87h8 of treatment plant construction for approved projects. Budgeted amount is outstanding balance on projects pending final EPA and SWRCB review. Fees - All Districts now have an adopted sewer connection fee schedule. This account also reflects industrial waste user charges levied by seven of the nine Districts pursuant to the Uniform Industrial Waste Ordinance and the Revenue Program, and . the user fees implemented in Districts Nos. 1, 3, 5, 6, 11 and 13, Annexation fee revenue is undeterminable and, thus, is not included in the budgets unless there is an existing agreement providing for payment of fees. Sale of Capacity Rights - This account records income from sale of capacity rights to outside agencies such as SAWPA, including the capital replacement charge. Joint Works Equity Sale - Revenue from the annual joint facilities interdistrict equity adjustment required by the recalculation of the respective ownership percentages. Cost of this adjustment for purchasing Districts is included in each District's Share of Joint Works Construction. Share of Joint Works Construction - Represents each District's share of joint treatment and disposal facilities expansion discussed above under Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF) . Bond Retirement and Interest Expense - Payment of principal and interest on outstanding general obligation bonds and certificates of participation of the respective Districts. Page 6 Share of Joint Operating - Represents each District's share of operating and maintaining the jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities, and administrative activities. Costs are distributed based upon each District's respective gallonage flow (see Joint Operating Fund statement for details) . District Operating and Other Expenditures - Consists primarily of individual Districts' general operating expenses; industrial monitoring, operations, maintenance and repair of the respective Districts' collection systems. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OAANK COURT MANY JOINT OPERA7INB/NOItl IU CAPITAL ENP SUBSET REVIEW 9 MONTHS ENDED 3131/90 fdNIVEO BUDGET PEAR-TO-DATE (DISPENSED YEAR-TO-RATE IT" EXPENDITURES FORM IEIPEN0E0 L� SALARIES, RARB 0 BENEFITS Solari.. 4 No. 11,530,000 12,338,433 5'"1'567 67.671 P+Yroll ROOM, 3,157,000 3,ON,337 2,076,663 9.731 TOTAL PAYROLL 23,617,00 13,616,770 1,0Eq,230 65.141 Less, Chor9esuts to DIM I CORP 16,000,0001 (4,10,723) 11,1 9,2n1 0.011 NET JOINT OPERATION PAYROLL 17,617,000 11,478,045 6,201,713 64.901 MATERIALS, SUPPLIES 6 SERVICES ---- ---- —_--_ Golding, Oil S Ofolel 250,00 120,034 129,966 48.011 Inlvaun 600,N0 449,742 ISO,= 74.161 Mes0ership, 30,000 14,814 15,126 49.391 OTYtn Esp,es 165,N0 139,301 25,699 84.4n Chlorin,106v Cortrol 3,100,000 1,807,701 1,292,299 19.311 Chemal Coagulants 2,597,000 1,449,493 1,137,517 56.NI Other Op hint Supplies 5n,000 441,959 133,041 74.861 Contractual 1erHps 6,920,000 4,141,511 2,671,447 60.731 Proi,s,imal Sorricas 330,N0 310,514 19,416 91.341 Printinq 6 Pu111oltion 243,N0 197,602. 47,318 MOST Equippnt Asnlal 200,ON 154,337 45,u3 . n.in RePoin 6 Road.m 3,763,W0 2,131,467 1,633,333 16.611 Resmch I Hanocrinq 2,070,000 1,423,544 646,436 61.771 Trust, Ao,ti08 E Iralsinq 123'"D 68,406 36,594 54.721 UncolleetWl, Account, 2,000 241 1,759 12.031 Utilitb, 7,220,000 3,775,212 3,04,780 N.291 Othor Eg0111 SIS,NO 104,246 110,754 70.49% Prier Years E,peme, SO,NO 20,231 21,769 S6.461 No Opratie9 hpes,es 45,60 37,444 17,536 0.991 TOTAL NAIERIALS I SERVICES 28,114,00 17.ns,961 I1,6N,039 59.831 Gs,, ALLOCATION TO DISH I CCU 1350,N01 (450,2661 100,266 MASS SIT JOIN OPEN RAIERIALS E SERVICES 29,544,000 16,B35,695 11,708,3N 9.III TOTAL JOINT OPERATION EIPENSEI 46,231,000 21,313,740 17.117.260 61.241 NERVES --Avenols 11,705,N01 11,162,9271 37,927 103.40% Less, Allocatim to SIDES I CUSP 3.00 2,215 2,715 44.301 NET JOINT OPERATING R2VEIIS 11,700,0001 (1,160,7121 60,712 Y 103.571 NET JOINT OPERATING EXPENSES 44,531,000 26,553,on 17,977,172 59.6n --_��-- --- --NALLONABE DATA --••--_______ -- A.B. ELM CHARGES DISTRICT MOST _ TO DATE BUDNr TO SAFE _-1 _ —�9,240 W7,362 4,092,ON 2'"1'521 2 N,ON 23,166 14,232,000 1,375,ON 3 31,BSI 23,690 14,137,009 9,564,443 5 4,560 3,594 2,026,000 1.275.03 6 5,021 4.149 2,587,000 11499,953 7 8,185 5,413 3,63B,N0 1,992.222 II 7,135 4,614 3,173,000 1,660,00 13 303 273 134,000 90,693 14 1.10 1,127 490,000 407,435 100,138 73,440 44,331,000 26,553,NN COMITY SANITATION DISTRICT M. I SDMMY MMX LY FINRNCIAL RUD17 9 namm ERMD S131110 MET REVIEW 1981.90 Avuldng laar-To-008 \ I Budget Year-To-Oale Budoel 1 Expand Beginning Fund Btlmny July 1 19,109,035 —�-- -_--�--_- REVENUC9x _— Tax Lwy (Bond fusels) onIV) 11,915 11,511 7,364 W.991 Tax AllerolimnJSubanliens (ohm of 111 1,924,40 1,07,072 Bs6,921 54.911 Fde,al art State Construction Bann 217,400 120,W6 1",344 42.01% Comntnn Fee, 1,361,000 102,774 1,450,226 6.311 Other Fears 3,153,OW 2,106,073 1,446,927 62.451 Sib of Capacity Rights I59,Ond 0 489,000 Max Interest L Die,. Receipts 961,On I,IJ6,775 (473,773) 149.511 Other 1,350,W0 0 1,350,OW 0.001 Total A...no. 10,113,173 5,134,861 5,309,01/ -_— 49.17% .w..mm. �___ .a......... .........xx. Total Anne,i Beginning Balance, 2/,213,896 EXPENDITURES, She,. of Joint works Trot. Pint i Reserve, 13,911,OW /,378,/95 9,3W,303 32.1n District Trunk Lnr Coast, L Reserves 2,221,000 0 2,221,000 O.WS Bud lelinnnl and Interest Expense 2,411,073 1,017,433 1,394,442 42.111 She,. of Joint edit, Operating Ensm" 1,092,00 2,661421 1,430,479 65.041 Pm ind for Rei.bunennt Agrnomb 0 0 0 O.OM District operating i Other En,idllurt, /19,000 2M,055 1d,945 64.131 Total Expenditures IB,II7.075 1,345,304 11,572,371 36.961 Ending font Bain... �_• 11,696,312 ��v..o. uY�•�• FMILITIEB EMISSION --_� _—_-- Balance MJu.tsnla Transfer to Balms . 7NB9 i AMU... Find Assets 313IJ90 WMTROC710M IN PRoBMMa —__ -- ------ --- (-16 SA/We, Rd Trans Modifications 0 621 621 Sub-Tut.l 0 621 0 - 629 Share of Joint Yorks 13,703,231 4,376,495 (67.1201 11,414,606 5ub-iot.l 13,903,231 .4,578,495 (67,110) -I6,/1/,606 COMLEIM PROPERTY, PLANT i EQUIP, - --- -A---' Land no Properly light, 81,39B 81,39E Collection Llse, rod Punt Ste,. 5,779,133 5,779,133 TrMOsent facilities 0 0 Disposal fullllin 11,593 11,593 general Plant ant Adoin. Foil. 35,256 35,231 Equity In Joint Treat.nl Fuil. 26,436,431 (29,141) 67,120 26,474,403 Other Assets at Cost L... Avert. 47,092 (12,312) 35,370 ------------ fetal Property Plant L Equip. 46,294,924 4,537,663 ----- u 30,832,787 �e.as' CM%Y SMITATIM DISTRICT M. 2 WWRY Out a PINMCIAL EMT 9 MMNS MUD 3/31/90 a= MOIM IuMM nn•le•lale w%t t...wesd hollarM face hh.ub Jul. 1 129,096,I1B 1ElFY0f51 -- Tu Ito, Iw man w1n 0 6 0 :.x: lac MIM.t.."It, nwa lone» lac 7,9n,M0 5,21317" 2,669,284 uA: PNral .M Sn.. wuLtl.. Y.n, 7%,%0 372,612 151,10 CAN 4nent.ee in, 1,909.00 3,1M,n1 1,386,172 11.7:3 Ater f.es 3,172,000 2,e%,3M ee1,632 4.311 Sole el Co.",treat. 1,349.000 0 1,319,000 :.at: Interest 1 sex. exuese 3,192,OM 4,316,812 11.124,012, 12.:e: Meer 0 0 0 4.3r -----.---- ............ Total lai 21,333,w 13,911,33E 5,110,661 8.::: u.......... ............ total Romanic. I 1%anelg balanced 145,011,111 E3PENDITMES, Sex,at idiot Mn, Ira. rent I Ller.n Se,6%,Ado 12,621,110 11,7n,40 h.r: District 11.1 Was. "In• I low,.. 27.on,ADo lo,3e1,»2 EA.7761461 a.%1 Teleran Enwn 1,1%,0M I,mtl,tll 2,199,011 . ;.an barrel lent vac Ooorm.l W..n 11,232,010 1,371,aM 5,156.994 A.11: Diet.Mf lr ow, I,an.l 19•euwu 0 0 0 0.%: Olnct Sorrow, 1 %.a 4,xe11re. I,IM,OAd 1,379,IID 1%,U]I 1M.R1 Mal E.enOlwrn 11,%i,MO 31,276,255 M,la,163 C.M ......••••Enflnl had Mllnln .� 110,13/,1M .re..m.. FACILITIES EIMNSION _.......ram........__. Balou Mlualeaut. Tramlr le h.nu 711/M 1 Addition, Frod Man COMn=lu to MO6M5f, 2-5-2 Drn9elDllte 111mi MIT 161 fIx NO 2:5 Soflom PIS ara"I 1,367 e.1,1 2-29 Oro9.w 0nxsew 18 SS,631 ::.In 2•21"tall.Saw Exllfaalnl 19,23E 1,M1 2e,20 hrw Gn,o PIS waster 5,613 18 Less Plot M. 3 -snhf.erl Swem of e Possibility Aesrt 4,361 %tore A.431 2-11.3 A. hoes hill., Mill War. Sa.x 11,354 623,253 Psi 2-I49 Rx2d1.Ron - WI 47,391 322,16E lae,237 Ietnn.soepl., Cali It SallMx 1 Slmtlo Structure Seim 3,1171 left Inlrnpour her irM SYI to 61....1I 2-6-2 2,00 I.W. tn-1, 2a1-2, 2-n-1 hthd laurtnur SMI 5,991,043 9,0%,1% 15.%9.W Ent INOMfalf lnnrtMlm 2.22 601,13E 6/,412 M5.3% 2-27 Se. Auden.A.11e1 Se.r, 313,1% I17,IM 47:.w Oise a9 to Closed A. Mina 17 11 Sul 7,00,941 Iq]oI,STS 0 U.A\14 SMre of Joint Y.,a, 39,E%,926 12,521,360 II13,091 •32.131,IS7 Se0-To1al 39,697,926 12,621,30 IIM,O%I 3:.111,431 ._......... DDNPLETEI PAOPEAT1. Tom 1 EAUlp1 _----_--------_.------ Land ad Property Rt91t1 517,694 53%611 Oallactlon Linda ads stop Stna 62,234,609 12.29.M1 irritant facilities 0 0 Drupeel /uflilin 33,172 33.172 6nral Plot ad Main Total 69,913 69.913 Unit,In Met Trestawl Pail 73,103,639 IM,332I ta,O% IS.SM.316 Other A...to at Sol lac.Audit 214,100 19,339) 19,761 Total Properly Plot 6 Floes 185,335,995 22,1M,102 0 211.121.391 MNIY "DTA110 DISTRICT 0. 3 _ MOT WMIERLY FINANCIAL REN1T 9 FIRMS ENDED 3131190 --_ BWEO MIR ------- — _ 1989-90-- Ro m" yea-le-Date hipt 9w-rHata Mlet 1 E.PmaW Igesn... No bltu0, ]ul7 1 --- II3,463,732 MENUESt '•In L"Y I000 IOabl 011) 139,000 I441211 8.719 75.021 Ia AIIm.U0L5 ratim, (ewe N 111 10,171,000 616151151 1.10.m n.Ri Fmon1 .o Std .Cootralim Ir.t. 858,OW 161-74 IW,126 42.111 Comatmi fees 2,60,0411 t.m.6W 1.3111.3" 0.961 Dior Fee. 9,6R,W0 6.621.0W 3.05.90 62.401 Sao 01 In L9 I"U. 1,40,000 a 1,4t5,M LWS Inor"t t era. Saint. 3,121,OW e,217,1R I196,162) Im."I atW 134,0011 a ht,aW 0.01 T0.19e.mie H,519,OW 19.2R.237 9 76.781 67.511 Iota P.'ou 11"oon, Btim[0 131,e0,94. •••,•••• -•• ��.e.. E PEWITWES: • So..of Ant York. Trot. Plat 1 Rimnm k,H6,00D 11,IW,@ 0.:11.171 37.k1 hit rut Truk Senr Custr 1 So.,.. 23.163.000 1.012.:51 :1,;W,219 4.01 Inn kotu..mt no Interest 0gmee /,561,791 .8761Jll L:3.692 40.921 a..e1 Ina Wk. 0 eraio Dann. 14,136,000 I.W.60 ;5a1.a7 60.501 hone" for Imai..not Agrrronte 0 1 a 0.00 l.0rinl Oaraml 1 D6.r E.Pm01tu" 1,90,M M.950 1.M.0W 11.551 ------------ bm1 hen"tmn M,70,79/ 16.463.e,1 }.:11,316 31.49% (In,Fme Ia+un m.® IW,.W.91 ............ •........ _--"---_ — --------------------_-..--- MCILITIES EIPAn10N PUntnm unor To ..--•.•-'-Wait t7110 I am.t.m. •:IR ten" 3131190 ....._.... ----------- CMUMIED IN MRMSS: ....................—... 1-I4-12 Cntrutor .11A:9. 322,9291 11-11 uaor P15 0a0"r- 3 1 it 99 19,:" 19,265 I-sm ion ae MMole,0 Miller Wir 1r0. Seer 31,06 11.:1 71,104 1-20-1 hller-xol"r 9nil Rod 3,9B,SM M.:67 4,90,633 S-11-2 Loon. 1dr,tgtor Boer 27,421 7.9" 51,423 4:4,V.ntori Wink Roliel 3-23 32,M 1.1:1 U,W3 1...th.. Sdoi" Cats Eul.akw -25,066 Mo 0,1" Imn.Pis Yygrne 25,2W 00% 0,667 1-10 Ehwute Ov¢t Cmnati0 to Miat 2,071 2,01 SN-Torn 4,103,159 1.011JU a 5,135,910 9orr 91 Joni Yerb 93,060,051 II.729.2:3 :: Jlu SI,SW,10 14-1041 0,060,056 13.:W,1: .--:J,9R7 56,569,253 ............ ImPiClEO FROPMIY, R6411 MIPS --Lae nY Proo tY DISK, 210,231 280,231 Collorhn it... nF " Sto 55,313,312 55,50,312 I.nmmt f"'In" 9,922 9,922 9110m1 F11.1Ehes 38,419 20,019 Senora Plot no into Fail ID,20 161,335 1 / E9mn it lout tnumnt Fail 81,BR.011 tO.:D -J`.:❑ 81,990,709 `+W :low Aneh it Cost Le"Dort. 16,322 .27.0n 69,226 --___-...___ tihl Floral Plot 1 ERa9 185,131'"1 T1,6R.^I 0 199,759,219 [WXII IAYITAIIN DISTRICT 0. 5 9YMMY WMMY FINANCIAL R T 9 mm an 1I311M am min I96M Annular, Yair-T.-Ruu bog Yair-b-0.t. bout I bwoa Standing Fund BNnns,JNy 1 75,912,6M _^-- RVEWut I. Lan Mond FReaN mIV) Mum ki'm 9,ON 69.79E IU AllsMioullaratlaF IMw N 121 2lik5,000 I,uO.MI 799,719 0.601 la.N ad Had Conrtnuim Bronu 161,M0 M,In 11.MS 11.971 Connotation Fix 0,00 M6,131 681,169 19.76E Ott.Iw I,769,DM 759.666 kM,S36 60.01E SNo a Capacity Rights 20,00 0 70,000 0.001 Inl.ast I TOM. bormt. 6n,OM 506.N0 u1,9M1 106.761 Olh. I,IL,OM 0 1,422,00 A= Into Rnsw d,M$,OM I,Wdn 1,Su,0u Md01 Trial Puma L I"mim Saluu. ®• Ur416,03 e.veeN radrar ElMm1yms. -- sous el ads Wort. Irat. Plonl I bww S,7AO,0M 1,36,M2 1,016.00 11.691 Buhi[l Truk Saw Cwtr A Aa.rn 2,M, M IIIJ47 I,M7.7u 6.41 Imo Rairswl ad iN.apl E.Paa M,OM M,Ma au M.731 bra al Jelnl Works Oh.rt1n Emanon l,oM,OM 1,595,6% n0.307 W51 humid 1. lamburatot Agnaiau 0 0 0 0.01 bOtriet bursting L MMr 4w01tura A90,OM ]IO,An 49,1M 60.6Et Put" 4PU/lur.s 10,911,W9 6,031,SN 6,962,60 36.9t Doing Fond blaw , arum 56,9M,W1 •vvvve. ..ern..... --- FACILl71EB EVAMIOY ___---__---•`•--_-- -•_- --_ b1w. Adluawt. Trust. Is INUu TIIIW A Additions Pinar Asia, 31311n COMIRACr1AY IN MOMS: 5-39 Siphon Il honaia 4maing al BM In. a sib Strait 51 6 Ion ITS 5-39 Man 516 Siphm 6 M.SM 11ptai/nl 2 1,366 I,3U bit. M Pill Lusary Lt..b cram. SM 624 636 3-37-2 Iw.tion al PER Fla mi in.I 6 33,3u Arm Truelllo.Us,A Corrosion Itay 5 16 5,042 16,717 71,7u S-79 Caul Fern bin Rapunanl 31 6 6,916,3M 1303,95H 6,67E,151 RuPIai.Lido Force bin 5-26 6,3M 6,97 Cent Truk ft.. 1 2,M3 I'm tut.Point PIS Ohara.M6 67,6tl M7 67,116 Sal hot Wion&of wart 0,Farm NNe 51 6 1.63A,3W 27,IM 1,09,296 S-17 blew Truk Bur Lido PIS I-V It PIS I2A,617 36,612 161,099 5-32 lilt.Pt A Ao[ky Pt Pig PM lour 5 1 6 21.6n 31,dn Sat Russia,N Truk Mar I" Mow 1,1 13 91,931 SM.30 6I4,636 0-53 it,Arid,.PIS IRA, MpU 7,673 u.S70 5-35 b. but Truk bw-lul Maiai 16 1 n,3a 39,1M 103,693 Sa6 CgaN Con.PJS A,IM 6,907 0,091 Sus-Ioto 9,MI,3Y I81,167 _--0 -9,375•dl5 Mr.el ).lot York. 6,1u,OM 7,345,793 1u.9171 9,076,SM ah-Iall 6du,OM 2,243,392 Iu.9171 9,076,5n mum MOIFRI't, nMr A IWih Land and ffmrt,Right, 4,231 6,331 Coll.tlon urns at Pup 5t.. II,W,677 II1165,677 t..giant F.Illtln 7,367 7,367 DUMuI ballliai 7,115 7,155 antra Plant as man F..0 76,01 76,051 Equity In Joist Trul om Fa[l1 13,047,817 116,796J 32.917 13,066,5M Other RUN& at Cost Lw Amt. 2,016 II,S171 202 Ta,I Pnart7 Plant A Ea1P 40,194,3% 3,610,M3 --• 0 67,w4ju WUnY SAYIIAIIN DISTRICT NO. I SIIMMY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT N AOIIIM ERNEO 3/3I/90 ---- BUO6ET RFNIEY ...............______ 1189-90 Re.inl.q Yur-To-Ute Bidd et yosr-Toiate ^Budget 1 E.pemm Btllmm�9 Fund BA1met, Jcl/ 1 11,721.131 REYFNUES: It, L111 (Bold Initial evil) 0 0 0 0.001 Ta, All.uttms/SUNYmllnn. (bar.W lit 1,271,010 110.211 L7,711 70.062 imer+l Ana State Coulr0dl9n Searle 133,M0 55.121 77,379 41.171 Connection Fees TELI 371,5O1 103,0" 68.401 Other Fees 2,241,000 1.411.511 761,422 65.761 Stl, m Cannty Rights S71,Om 0 226,000 0.001 let....t I nsc. Reosi of. 39,000 553,261 452,264) 110.431 Other 0 0 0 0.001 loin R'111.E 5,11390N ^3.321.46 1,719,510 --- 64.191 .a........ Iota( Revenue I Beginning blares 21.0N..19 .s.rt..ss^• . IlPtmllmi —•Y•_••• --•Intl el J11n1 Yrkt Tend. Plant L Anxves l,9/,90 2.131.112 3.421.70 38.191 0utnct Trunk Under Cancer 1 Reserves 3,279,000 t13A:J 3.163,49 3.521 Imo A.brtmnl And Interest Espmn 0 1 0 0.001 Lane .l Joint Yorks Operettas EM,Aws 2,587,000 1,191.153 1.011.041 57.981 Pro.lem for btiewtlunt Agrneents D 9 0 0.001 District Opxttiaq L Other F.poditorel 299,0m 121,992 110,001 61.801 Total F.Om0ltxos 11,712,000 3.69.mJ 1.623.133 32.931 Eat.,i.ea bids,., ....eve... •Il .U,..i ...A........ �YV••• FACILITIES EXPAMIM ........................ Belem Adwt.m0 'q.er To WIMn 7/1109 1 VntAr. air" mots SAIMO ......... ............ CORTRUCII01 IN MOORE$$, 5-18 Siam at Proposed Cressing of Sell So. .f its Street 5 1 6 393 393 5.39 Out, 516 Sieben 1 the SM SIphWPIt 2 72 letter M PIS teleselry Lin. bldellm 5 16 .11 219 5-37 Ingmlled Pill Plan 401 es.er 5 1 6 1.111 1,314 T... l... 0!x I Corrosion Study 5 1 6 3,042 UJIT 21,739 6.12 Farn,m Relief 59,40t lad 9,367 3.21 Caul Fern Win Rit lammat 5 6 6 U7,217 tlS,lge 351,219 little Point PIS Upgrade 51 6 17,149 132 17,31 3-31 Societe Prllms of Wsst Nay Force Rain 51 6 97,506 1.426 91,932 5-32 letter Pt I Wcp M PIS Ise 5 k 6 7,105 7,515 1/-Id A l l Water [ft.. 10.1-2 he. Street 0 Force Mai., Districts 6, 1If 1/ 69,164 10,619 III'm Sam-total 622,984 113410 _ 0 79,496 ..._....... ............ sore of Joint York. 6,911,7n 11111.:12 .31.m) 9,011,lb Sue-tot. 6,911,726 2.111.212 Q1,Wl1 t,031,IW -`-------- ............ COMLEnD MEE", PLANT I EIUIP, -- Land and Property light, 362 SIT Collection Leon mil Re"STAN 1^20 1,90,249 Tremont Facilities 2.69 2,69 Of,..ss1 Facilities I'm 7,9/ limited Plant at W.In Fact) 14,312 84,362 El.elr IN Jelot IreAR.nl Full 13,201,M 113.101 I1::2 13,222,= Other Assets at Cost Len effort. 20.92 ,7,911, 12,331 .....�..�. ........._. total Timers Plant I Epip 22,211,207 7.211.a6 0 24,420,303 COMITY SNITATIN DISTRICT 0. 1 SIBNAAT OONATEALY FINANCIAL REPORT 9 RNTN ENDED 3/31190 - --__- mm NRIEA - --- 1919i0 Re++ining Yur-T".to Budget Year-lo-bte Budget 3 bsscd.d \aaua� Beginning Fund Balances, July 1 55,676,49 _-'- REVENN, Its Lary Mind Food .) only) 0 0 0 0.001 its Ailxatims/Suh unllona (ber, of 111 3,960,000 2,449,271 1,310,737 At.= Fadvcl and Stale Construction Brute IN,000 79,050 I08,9N 01.051 Connection Fiat 1,9a,N0 891,9N 1,041,013 45.911 Other Fees $16.00 593,291 (79,291) 115.371 Sale of Capacity Rights 311,00 0 321,00 S.N1 Interest 6 Met. Receipts 1,632,000 2,116,5N 1354,545) 113.111 Other 0 0 0 0.001 Total Amman, 1,557,000 6,101,146 2,334,154 ` 72.491 Tel ) Revenue 1 Beginning Babnces ®r� 61,121,6am ��Ne •o•�Y- EIPENDITURNt Sher, of Joint Barks Val. Plant R Inerm 1,193,ON 2,999,704 5,893,296 3L731 District frank Sower Co.tr 6 Reversed I6,I90,ON 1,126,163 15,063,637 6.961 Band btireesnl and interest bpou b9,20 344,365 224,923 60.491 Share of Joint Burls Operating Expenses; 3,631,W 1,962,212 1,6N,778 54.49% Pro.Jdal for Ralatmmmit Agronomics 0 0 0 0.01 District Operating 6 Orono Eaponitleres 1,3N,ON 791,293 590,707 57.291 Tat+l b,ssdllurss b,673,211 7,214,747 23.421,341 23.621 Ending Fond Release, a®®• 54,513,09 �•®�• �••O0f•e FACILITIES EVANIN -__ Wax, Ageslmb Transfer To blot. 711/0 1 Addition, Flood Asset, 3131/90 -- N-1-1 Sunflower let SN Ile 7-I3 Coup.Relief Sum 0,330 00,330 Olaf 7 Initiated Properties Study 3,287 3.217 7-9 Fairview Subtrunk 321 521 7-12 bray 12 PIS Fit.Rain I24,336 124,336 7.11-1,1,7 AOandonsmit ad Radlfn of PIS 52,363 IN,136 U8,519 7-10-1 both Airport Oirvsion brat eee,pn 473 6N,S10 City it Drugs I.t+loot, 20,473 20,4/3 Whole Adj. Re Orange III. Ayot. 42,015 62,341 100,827 Rate Streit PIS 7-7 1,061.241 2,366 1,063,807 I4-1-1 A 1 B Sisley Int., 14-1-2 Baker Strait 0 Far. his Districts 6, 7 1 la Im,330 121,421 932,7S1 Serer Names ter Ent Tustin Specific Plan 17,798 17,791 Reconstruct Siphon at A.O. la 3,I32 3,132 0 Soh-Total 2.114,716 1,126,111 0 3,240,079 Share of Joint Yorks 9,IN1014 2,119,104 (43,9751 12,732,753 Sub-Tab] 9,777,020 2,799,701 (43,973) 12,752.M COMPLETED PRNNIY, PLANT 1 EOUIP, •---- _•- ~Land and Property Right, 276,454 276,454 bllutkm Lim., and Paso Stu, 22,974,606 22,971,5b Trsstunt Facilities 0 0 Disposal Facilities 10,712 10,702 0mml Plot and Adw F&W 13,334 15,334 Equity in Joint 7nat.0 Facil 10,628,551 (19,0971 43,975 11,653.429 Other Assets at Cast lss. burl. 213 1215) 0 total Properly Plat 6 Equip 33,811,6a 4,106,335 0 57,924,217 CpUMIr SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 SVMARY WARTFRLY FINANCIAL REPORT 9 NONTIIS 00ED 3n1190 --------------- -__ ___-____------___--.-_---_----__�__�__-� BUOSEI REVIEW _________________----______ _- --__----__------_--.---_--__ ______- 1919-9C RemninS reu-Io-Otte Budget Yar-To-Oats Budget C E.penned B.p:nnmq Fund B+lantaa, My 1 33,936,851 _--_— ---- ----------- AEVENUES: --la Len (Bond Panels) only) 26,00 13,916 10,060 61.221 IL Water.one150...Elan (MR. of 1%) 2,141.M0 1,173,620 665,310 68.921 lateral and Slate Cnatructus Brats 110,0M 79.139 130,141 42.031 Cmnntlon Fen 713,Oa 603,113 177,07 77.311 other Fen 2,10,OM 1,111,743 01,257 69.681 Sale 01 Capstalr elghh 321,000 0 324,OM 0.001 Imrnt I R1.,. Rneapt. 671,Mp 541.IN5 (63,103) 113.791 Other 4,52,400 0 6,5u.m 0.001 Total Rnarn 10,663,000 1,215.356 6.427,644 `39.613 Total Rmm .I Igiaasg pg.. ®• 0,152,211 •e•••e•~ ��®� EVEnITURES: ---_-- Share .1 !there Orb U.S. Plat E Ressrnr 7,090,000 1.030.402 6.067.511 13.692 Sabra Ira6 Saar Cents, 6 NNW,. 1,554,400 ISM" 3.4201691 1.751 Iwo Returned and loternt Eager, 29,60 21.113 548 98.151 She,.of Joan Walk, Operating UP..... 3,175,000 1.6611.661 I,`06,910 52.541 hn.d" for RnirOwnnat Agranata 0 R 0 Mot Butncl Operating 1 Other Eapudilorn 366,000 433,:21 130,679 76.912 Iola) F.padilern 11,622.60 3,:11:31 911261436 36.721 Enle9 F.., Saloan a>��e 36,156.007 •••••,,,� a®�, FMIL171ES FIPNSIOY ---•-^--�_—�_�� Idan --- Ae1nlNata •••___• Ir..SW to lalane 711109 1 areaba. Fun belt 31311" CONSTRUCTION IN FISHER% 11-11 Slater PIS Seago St. Irprdmat. 305 M.MI A,IN So as Estrin, generator at Slater PIS 62 I1'a0/ 91,01 11.16 Ora Anne Trost So. Speak 122,469 5,311 171,2M CEM bwartenta For Coral Trans 0 1 DOW CMsa 3,573 3,573 Slater Stalin Rotor L Pun Upgrade 76,970 36,170 Sul-Tent 863,381 10,:0/ W 0 9p6,00 Share el Met sort, 9,507,660 1,330.602 o44,4253 Q.Spli'm 5040.1 9,507,60 1.031,402 (44.6231 12,493,607 COMPLETES PROPERTY, "I I ERUIPI -- ----.T�long ad ad Property Rights 146,596 IM,9Y Eellnt3pe Lien no Pan 56n 18,416,175 18,416,175 Irntent Fullitin 0 0 Disposal Fullitin 3,053 3,00 ganal Plat and Main Pa41 M,164 21,166 E9nt7 a least Irntunt Pont 11,071,282 lI/,:Ib e4,475 11,10.113 Other stelae at Ent Last Awl. 7,019 Total Property Plat 1 Solids 47,050,720 3,112,6M -------- 0 50,193,31E COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 ID)MARY 91AUMV FINANCIAL REPORT 9 NMS ENDED 3/31/90 BUDGET MIXED 1989-90 Resainin Year-T"ate Budget Year-To-Oat, Budget C Expanded .� -__------- _-_____ Beginning Ford Balance,, July 1 7,627,107 REVENUES: ._—.._... lie Levy IT and Fundls) only) 0 0 0 0.001 I,, Allocation,/$ahrentions (Shire of ITT 0 0 0 0.001 Federal and Slate Construction grants 3,000 1,502 1,490 50.07% Connection Fees 2,275,000 2,122,370 152,630 93.29I Other Free 315,00D 169,660 125,340 60.211 Sets of Capacity lights 3,000 0 3,000 0.00I Internet L Mist. Receipts 610,000 599,294 20,706 96.611 Other 0 a 0 0.001 ------•-- ......._.._ _..---• Total Revenue 3,2D6,000 2,902,826 303,174 70.541 .........®. *:!a] Revenue 4 Beginnin9 Balanced 10,529,933 r. .m..m®... ___________ RES: :...m of Joint Yorks Truk. Plant a Rseerrn 5,029,000 57,012 4,911,98E 1.131 Oc,tricl trunk Sever Coheir 6 Rowrvie 4,910,000 0 4,918,000 MIT Bona Retirement and Interest Expense 0 0 0 0.00I Shea of Jowl warts Operating Expenses 134,000 99,e95 33,305 73.651 Provided far Reishursesent Agrseamts 0 0 0 0.001 District Operating L Other Expenditures 162,000 120,12 41,042 74.17% Total Expenditures 10,243,000 273.065 9,967,135 2.69% .—®- ---------- .........va. Ending Fond Balances .m..®.env. ------—__.---_------ -__-----------------------------------_._....._.��__— FACILITIES EXPANSION _....___ _—__---_____________________-_----------__-____._.__—�—_ Balance Adlu,tmt, transfer To Balance 711/89 L Additions Fixed Assets 31311" ............ CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS, -____---________________ Share of Jowl Narks 179,13D 57,012 1835) 235,307 -___________ Se0-Total 179,130 57,012 (833) 235,307 __--------- -___________ COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT a EgU1P: --Lod and Property Right, _-_— 0 0 Collection Lines and Pump Store 0 0 Treatment Facilities 0 0 Disposal Facilities 0 0 Soviet Plant and Refit Fact) 0 - 0 Equity in Joint treatment Facil 340,643 13621 835 341,116 Other Assets at Cost Less Avert 79,250 120,379) 5B,871 ____________ ____________ -_.---- Total Property Plant A Equip 599,023 36,271 0 635,294 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14 81HHLM9 OIIARTEW FINANCIAL REM? 9 MONTHS ENDED 3/31/90 BMSET AEVIEY ---�_---_^^-- 1981-90 Regaining Year-To-Dace Budget Year-To-Date Budget 1 Etpodn BMtanoq Fund blocks, July 1 17.02,767 _----- AEVFINES, --_ I. Ley (Sod Faod1,1 only) 0 0 0 0.001 - Tac Alleuti olso ...twas 15Aer, of ill 0 0 0 0.DD1 Federal And State Costraction Ernst$ 156,000 63,760 90;240 42.151 IOND Fees 10,767,000 6,811.241 3.935,759 63.261 Omer Fine 0 I'm 11,63J1 0.00% 5,11 of Capacity Rights 267,000 0 267.000 0.001 iaterot A mac. Receipts 165,000 139,422 26,372 83.901 Other 330,000 0 530,000 0.001 Ida[ Aaoae 11,885,000 7,411,062 4,067,938 39.041 ............ ..s®.ne.... Total Rams, A Beginning Dilate 24,659,829 EIPERMIRMS, A %.a at Jowl Wks TrM. Plot 6 Reserves 3,845,M 2,05,3dt 3,349,632 12.691 District Tract Sam C...tr a Raurvo 7,118,000 2,523,109 4,594.991 35.451 So, :ettnant and talent Eepease 0 0 0 0.001 v, of Joint parts Operating Expenses 4",000 407 ass 62,565 33.151 +a Its Rmoraeut Agroonts 0 u 0 0.001 .ur.a Oparstug S Other &potlitoes 216,000 0,213 150,707 30.191 Total tpwgttwa 13,669,000 3,491.125 0.177,075 40.171 I'd,., face Into,. m®em I9,Iw./01 ............ _— FACILITIES EXPANSION Balance Adnstents ianfar to Balance 7/1/69 i Addition Fun Asset, 3/31/90 ....._..... CONSTRUCTION IN RAIDERS: '1e-I-1 A a B SWnr lat., 1/-1-2 like Street 0 Force ease, Districts 6, 7 a It 336,134 2,523.109 2,859,261 Raw St. Pup Station 7-7 2,657,211 0 2,637,210 Mu St. Pup Satin Iproveeots 1-0-1 w w So-peta] 2,993,372 2,523,1/9 --_----_ 0 5,516,521 Share of Joint pike 7,840,373 2,191,366 •--(36,5811 10,299,162 Sep-Tol1 7,840,375 2,495,368 (36,3B1J 10,299,16E CBNLETEI PAMERTY, PLANT a EQUIP: ----- ----- -___�- _--- Lug w, Prperty Rights 0 0 Collnttw lwa ad Pup Stet 4,752,737 4,732,737 ,ratings Facilities 0 0 Disposal Facilities 0 a Seseral Plot fed Again Ficil 0 - 0 --� Equity ,n Jowl Iroteeat Fail 14,979,819 ,15,665) 50.591 15,004,313 Other Assets at Cost Us, Asset. 85,937 122,0w1 63,839 lot,) Property Plot A Equip 30,652,240 4,980,534 0 35,632,774 RE : AGENDA ITEM NO. 13 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ®Ft P.O.BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 108C6 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALFORNIA 92708-7018 (714(962-2411 May 23, 1990 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,2,3 ,5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 RE: Report and Recommendation for Year 6 NPDES Ocean Monitoring Program (1990-91) and Certification of Negotiated Fee for Amendment No. 7 to Agreement with SAIC for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall, Specification S-032. Background As a condition of the existing NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit jointly issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Regional water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) , the Districts must conduct an extensive monitoring program designed to characterize the effects of our discharge on the ocean environment. This permit, issued in 1985 for a period of five years, was administratively extended by EPA/CRWQCB pending a decision on the Districts ' application for renewal of the permit which was authorized by the Boards last July. In 1985, the Districts issued a request for proposals to provide ocean monitoring contract services for the Districts' 120-inch ocean outfall, Specification No. S-032 . After evaluation of seven respondents, the Districts entered into an agreement with Science Applications International Corporation (SAIL) to provide these services for the five-year life of the permit and negotiated a fee for Year 1 in the amount of $917, 680. At the time of the original contract award it was noted for the Boards ' information that the requirements of this unprecedented monitoring program had been established by the EPA and that it was the first of its kind. Although the EPA had yet to fully define all of the work to be accomplished, the NPDES Permit required that the work commence immediately. Because of this, it was anticipated that as the program proceeded and the requirements were refined it would be necessary to modify the contract to provide for the changes that would Boards of Directors May 23, 1990 -- Page Two �r be required by EPA. Accordingly, the contract was increased to $940, 486 with the addition of Amendment No. 1 for relatively minor changes in the scope of work. Amendment No. 2 was executed upon initiation of the EPA-required ocean current study which amended the total cost for Year 1 to $1,002,705. In Years 2, 3, 4 and 5 the total was increased by addendas 3 through 6 to $1, 530,486, $1,707,294, $1,942,265 and $1,928,990, respectively. The changes for Years 2-5 included significant increases in the scope of work required to be performed to better document the environmental conditions in the vicinity of the Districts' ocean outfall. The Year 5 program also shifted some of the tasks from SAIC to the Districts and other independent outside contractors that resulted in an overall cost savings. The proposed Year 6 Ocean Monitoring Program shifts all tasks back to SAIC as in Years 1 through 4, to allow Districts' staff additional time to analyze the data collected. Although the Year 6 SAIC contract will increase $211,795, from $1, 609, 570 to $1,821,365, the overall monitoring program will decrease $84,777, from $1,928,990 to $1,844,213. Staff has found that by shifting those tasks removed from the SAIC contract in Year 5 back to SAIC in Year 6, additional analysis and evaluation time for staff scientists would be realized. In addition, through negotiations with SAIC, substantial reductions in the cost of the overall program can be realized in Year 6 even with the inclusion of $48,652 for four additional special reports and the incorporation of two additional analytical techniques. The two analytical options are necessary to answer questions raised during scientific review of the Districts' Annual Report; and the four "white papers" are necessary to verify the rational behind proposed monitoring program reductions. These program reductions have the potential to further reduce the cost of the ocean monitoring program by more than $140,000 per year. The attached staff report details proposed Amendment No. 7 to the Agreement With SAIC for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts ' 120-inch Ocean Outfall, Specification 5-032, including modifications to the tasks for water quality sampling and analysis, benthic bio-accumulation, computer data submission, October 30 annual data submission report, the two options for water column chlorophyll/BOD analysis and fish tissue PCB cleanup, and the four "white paper" reports. Under the proposed program, staff will assist SAIC in the collection of water samples during the monthly and quarterly cruises so that the water mass can be sampled within a 12 hour period. ..r Boards of Directors May 23, 1990 �.. Page Three The overall Year 6 program is summarized as follows: SAIC Year 6 Program $ 1,772,713 SAIC Options 14,304 SAIC White Papers 34 .348 SAIC Total Year 6 Contract (Amendment No. 7) $ 1,821, 365 Staff Activities 22 ,848 Total Monitoring Program $ 1,844 ,213 This staff recommendation has several advantages. First the technical strength of the program will be maintained while allowing staff . scientists opportunity to adequately review data generated. Second, staff and SAIC will work together to improve the water quality portion of the monitoring program. Third, SAIC and staff will produce documents that will validate recommended improvements to the marine monitoring program with a potential future savings of over $140, 000 per year. Lastly, this overall Year 6 monitoring program represents a decrease of $84, 777 (4. 6%) from the Year 5 program. Certification of Negotiated Fee for Amendment No. 7 to SAIC Ocean Monitoring Contract The Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee for Amendment No. 7 to the Agreement With Science Application International Corporation (SAIC) for Ocean Contract Monitoring Services for Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. 5-032, in an amount not to exceed $1,821, 365, as follows: Amount Offshore Water Quality $ 243,289 Benthic Monitoring 762,278 Trawls 188, 646 Rigfish 53,983 Data Summary & Interpretation 322,708 Additional Services 62, 692 Options and White Papers 44,769 Profit 143 , 000 Total Amendment No. 7 $1. 821.365 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the contractor. 'v Boards of Directors May 23 , 1990 Page Four w i RECOMMENDATION The proposed program is in accordance with EPA and CRWQCB policies. The Selection Committee recommends approval of Amendment No 7 to the SAIL agreement and for SAIC and Districts' staff to conduct the Year 6 (1990-91) NPDES Ocean Monitoring Program as described above and in the . attached staff report. ISI A.B. "Buck" Catlin ISI William Mahoney A.B. "Buck" Catlin William Mahoney Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman ISI Richard B. Edgar ISI Don E. Smith Richard B. Edgar Don E. Smith Past Joint Chairman Past Joint Chairman ISI Don R. Griffin ISI Blake P. Anderson Don R. Griffin Blake P. Anderson Past Joint Chairman Dir. of Technical Services COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS al ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA I0944 ELLIS AVENUE RO.9Ox 6 21 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92129-9127 (7141962.2411 STAFF REPORT Year 6 Ocean Monitoring Contract: Amendment No. 7 to Contract With SAIC Ocean Monitoring Services Specification No. S-032 April 27, 1990 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY In August, 1985, the Districts entered a one year agreement with Science Applications International Corporation (SAIL) to perform the marine monitoring activities required by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) as part of the Districts' 301(h) ocean discharge permit. The agreement has been modified and extended by Board actions through Year 2, Year 3 , Year 4 and Year 5. The Year 5 monitoring contract ends June 30, 1990. In August 1989, the Districts submitted an application for renewal of the 301 (h) ocean discharge permit. The application is under review by EPA at this time and until a decision is made on the application the Districts' permit including its ocean monitoring program has been administratively extended under the existing terms and conditions. Because the ocean monitoring program will remain essentially unchanged, staff requested a proposal from SAIL to perform the ocean monitoring tasks for Year 6 (July 1, 1990 through June 30, 1991) . For Year 6, SAIC submitted their original proposal (hereafter referred to as Year 6(1) ) on April 10, 1990 for continuation of their role as the major contractor through the sixth year of the Districts ' ocean monitoring program. Following meetings with Districts ' staff, SAIC submitted a revised proposal on April 23, 1990, (Year 6(2) ) and additional options requested by staff were submitted on April 26, 1990. The Year 6(2) proposal reflects an SAIC cost increase over the Year 5 contract because tasks performed by the Districts in Year 5 have been assigned back to SAIC. To put SAIC's Year 6(2) proposal in perspective, it is compared to the initial Year 1 proposal costs from the four qualified vendors that responded to the original RFP in June, 1985 and SAIC costs for Years 1 through 5 are shown in Exhibit 1. The overall scope of the ocean monitoring program has increased significantly �. 1 during the last five years. However, the costs are still comparable to those of the other vendors' initial proposals when �..r the scope of work was less than it is today. A detailed cost comparison of the Year 6 (2) proposal with Years 1 through 5 are presented in Exhibit 2. Also shown, for the Director's information, are SAIC's preliminary proposals 5(1) , 5(2) and 5(3) for last year (alternative 5 (3) was ultimately selected for SAIC's work supplemented by CSDOC staff and subcontractor work) . Exhibit 3 graphically displays the major categorical costs for Year 1 through 6. Also presented in Exhibit 3 are the costs associated with the optional studies Districts' staff recommends as essential to adequately document the effect of the Districts' discharge on the marine environment. EVALUATION A major cost increase in Year 6 for SAIC's work is a result of the Districts' transferring responsibility for the water quality, the computer data submission to the federal network (known as "ODES") , the October 30 annual data submission and benthic bioaccumulation portions of the program back to SAIC. These tasks were assumed by the Districts' staff and often outside contractors for Year 5. Therefore, for the sake of a valid side- by-side comparison, the Year 5(1) SAIC proposal should be examined with Year 6. There will still be some minor Districts' staff involvement. For instance, because it is staff's intent in Year 6 to work with SAIC to obtain the most scientifically valid water quality data possible, and it is scientifically desirable to obtain the water quality samples within one tidal cycle (approx. 12 hours) in order to fully understand the water mass, the Districts and SAIC will work together, using two boats, to collect all station samples in a timely manner. An evaluation and comparison of program costs from Year 5 to Year 6 follows: SAIC's Comparison of Year 5 and Year 6 SAIC submitted their first proposal on April 10, 1990 and their second proposal on April 23, 1990. Exhibit 2 shows the major task costs of Proposal 6 (1)- and 6 (2) compared to Year 5 Proposals 5 (1) , 5(2) and the final cost of the Year 5 program, 5(3) . It is necessary to compare the Year 6(2) proposal to the Year 5(1) proposal because portions of the monitoring program were removed form the Year 5 (2) and 5 (3) proposals due to a shift in monotoring task responsibility. The Year 6(2) proposal reflects a sift of responsibility for those tasks back to SAIC. 2 The increase in Year 6 of $243,289 for the water quality portion of the monitoring program as compared to Year 5(3) is because the Districts' staff assumed this responsibility in Year 5. SAIC will reassume responsibility for sampling and analyses of water quality in Year 6, with Districts' staff providing short-term sampling assistance in order to sample the required stations in a single 12-hour period. The proposed water quality program in Year 5(1) , minus the ocean currents, equals $244 ,580 which is actually 0. 5 percent higher than the Year 6 proposal for the same program. SAIC has proposed, at the request of Districts' staff, additional data and program management reports and quality assurance in the water quality, benthic, trawl and rigfish tasks of the monitoring program. There were $25, 011 and $9,546 increases in the benthic and trawl tasks, respectively, compared to 5 (3) , due primarily to the above mentioned requested items. SAIC Proposal 6(2) data summary and interpretation reflects an $165, 109 decrease in this task from Year 5(3) when SAIC anc Districts' portions of this task are combinined, even though SAIC has resumed the ODES data submission and October 30 Annual Report portion of this task. The total Year 6(2) Proposal is $1, 772,713, for the basic program minus the options, which is a $163 , 143 increase over SAIC contract 5 (3) . As explained earlier, this is primarily due to SAIC resuming the water quality task and ODES data submission responsibility. The optional studies are discussed in the next section. The overall Year 6 program is summarized as follows: SAIC Year 6 Program 1, 772,713 SAIC Options (chlorophyll/BOD & PCB Cleanup) 14, 304 SAIC White Papers 34 , 348 SAIC Total Year 6 Contract (Amendment No. 7) 1, 821, 365 Staff Activities 2 ,848 1, 844 , 213 Optional Studies Districts ' staff solicited from SAIC proposals for additional services that are essential for understanding the effect of our effluent on the marine environment and for improving our monitoring program to supplement the information in our pending 301(h) ocean discharge permit renewal. In order to answer questions raised in the Districts' last annual report, staff requested analyses of 1) water column chlorophyll and biological oxygen demand (BOD) ; and 2) additional analytical work on tissue samples. In addition, a series of "white papers" were requested to validate Districts' staffs position that some parameters being measured are not necessary and, thus, not the best 3 expenditure of monitoring dollars. - Chlorophyll and biochemical oxygen demand will be measured to determine whether there is a change in phytoplankton productivity in the area near our outfall because of nutrient enrichment caused by discharge. The quarterly water column chlorophyll and BOD analyses will cost $12,956. An additional laboratory procedure is necessary to acquire a lower detection limit for PCB in fish tissues. The Districts have received suggestions from the scientific community that this will make the data more meaningful. This cleanup procedure will cost $1, 348. The optional "white papers" were requested in order to provide information to EPA and CRWQCB to justify the reduction or elimination of portions of the marine monitoring program that produce little or no useful data. We are hoping that the amendment to the program will occur when a new permit is eventually issued by EPA. The four, 20-40 page "white papers" will cost the Districts' $34, 348. The potential savings to the Districts for eliminating these subtasks will be approximately $150, 000 per year. More important is to have the scientific and regulatory communities agree that these changes will lead to an improvement in the overall ocean monitoring program. Transfer of Water Duality and other Prolect Tasks from Districts' Staff back to SAIL The Year 6(2) proposal, including options and Districts' staff costs for water quality assistance, shows an overall $84, 777 reduction from the Year 5 total costs. Districts' staff, under this proposal, will relinquish responsibility for the water quality, ODES data submittal, October 30 data submittal and benthic animal tissue bioaccumulation portions of the marine monitoring program. The following paragraphs discuss the rationale behind, and advantages of, allowing SAIC to reassume these tasks. The water quality task consists of collecting samples for a variety of water quality parameters at nine monthly stations and 17 quarterly stations and characterizing the currents around the outfall. Districts assumed the responsibility for this task in Year 5 to: 1) Use the Districts' superior oceanographic instrumentation 2) Reduce the overall cost of this task In this past year SAIC's subcontractor has purchased identical instrumentation and is now conducting intercalibration exercises 4 with Districts - staff. Districts' staff have found that they were spending too much time collecting data and too little time analyzing and evaluating those data. Districts' staff will assist SAIC in completing the water quality surveys in one tidal cycle which will provide more useful data-sets for subsequent analysis. However, the majority of the collections and all of the analyses will be conducted by SAIC. ' Districts' oceanographic staff are reviewing the last 5 years' current metering data to determine if additional information is needed to characterize the circulation patterns in the Districts' discharge area. If additional current data are found to be required to aid in the understanding of the water mass and effluent plume, staff will return to the Board with a proposal for additional work. Assuming insufficient benthic animal tissue for bioaccumulation will be successfully collected because of its sparseness, (as has been the case for the last 5 years) , SAIC has reduced their costs significantly. The reduction has gone from a Year 5 proposal of $59, 723 to Year 6(2) proposal cost of $4, 029. Districts' staff assumed this task in Year 5 reflecting the 610" in the Year 5 (3) proposal. The Districts budgeted $14,400 for staff activities for this project in Year 5. The Districts will request that EPA eliminate this task because not enough animal tissue for analysis can be "reasonably" collected with a reasonable level of effort. The third and forth tasks, quarterly ODES data submittal and October 30 annual data submission tasks, were assumed by the Districts in Year 5. Districts' data management system is now compatible with SAIC's system. The task of submission of the data can be handled by SAIC with Districts having complete review and control capabilities without having to do the necessary but tedious data entry. This will allow Districts' staff scientists additional time for analysis and interpretation. SUMMARY The SAIC contract for Year 6 will increase from $1, 609, 570 to $1, 821,365. This represents a $211,795 (13%) increase. However, the overall ocean monitoring program as proposed, including options and Districts' staff time for water quality sampling assistance, has been reduced from $1, 928, 990 in Year 5 to a total of $1,844,213 for Year 6. This represents a $84,777 (4. 6 percent) reduction from Year 5. 5 The overall program cost comparisons are summarized below: Year 5 Year 6 SAIC Year 6 Contract $1, 609,570 $1,821, 365 including options Staff Sampling Activities $ 319 ,420 $ 22 ,848 S 1.928 .990 $1,844 , 213 Included in the above mentioned costs are options not required in the Districts' NPDES permit but considered essential by Districts' scientific staff to improve the overall monitoring program. These options will provide justification to EPA for additional savings in future marine monitoring years. Staff will continue its quality oversight of the contract and will assist and encourage SAIL to produce useful scientific products, including publications in peer-reviewed literature. Staff will work with SAIC to encourage EPA and the California Regional water Quality Control Board to change the marine monitoring program and improve our understanding of the discharge area and its impacts on the marine environment. RECOMMENDATION SAIC continues to provide competent ocean monitoring services to the Districts. Staff recommends that the SAIC contract be amended (Amendment No. 7) to include the tasks for water quality sampling and analysis, benthic bioaccumulation, computer data submission and the October 30 annual data submission. Staff further recommends that the options detailed in this report be added to the SAIC contract and extend the contract as amended to include the Year 6 period for a total of $1,821, 365. Staff further recommends that Districts assist SAIC in the sampling of the monthly water quality stations in order that collection be completed within a 12 hour period. Exhibit 4 shows Districts' estimated sampling costs. 6 EXHIBIT 1 COST COMPARISON OF SAIC CONTRACT HISTORY AND OTHER "LIFTED VENDORS BIDDING ON INITIAL YEAR 1 CONTRACT OrigiMet Year Proposals Ki nnetic Lab/ Brow b Science Applications Increase K.P. Lindstrom, ECD Calduell International Corporation (Decrease) Year 1 Year 2 you, 3 Year 4 Year 5(3) Year 6(2) Year 5 to 6 Offshore Water S 282,078 S 672,471 S 4"'181 S 136,675 S 391,225 S 394,252 $ 558,704 0 S 243,289 S 243,289 Duality Benthic 632.001 901,157 706,465 402,297 530,798 582,342 708,199 737,267 762,278 25,011 TrauMs 85,352 92,121 121,778 79,328 105,922 115,576 143,746 179,100 188,646 9,546 Rigfish 54,768 22,142 32,875 20,915 31,614 34,271 39,976 54,236 53,983 ( 253) Data Summary 413,670 484,402 385,804 162,634 247,075 274,576 342,680 410,567 322,708 ( 87,859) Interpretation Additional 45,824 21,414 23,846 30,079 39,394 48,723 60,660 89,909 62,692 ( 27,217) services options end 0 0 0 82,593 56,909 131,276 76,399 12,264 44,769 32,505 Contingencies Profits 0 0 0 87,824 128,549 126,276 11,901 126,227 143,000 16,773 Prime Contract $1,513,697 $2,193,707 $1,736,949 S1,002,705 51,530,466 $1,707,294 51,942,265 51,609,570 51,821,365 S 211,795 costs Diet. b Cont. 0 0 0 0 D D 0 319,420 22,548 ( 2%,572) costs Total Program $1,513,697 $2,193,707 $1,736,949 $1,002,705 $1,530,486 31,707,294 $1,942,265 $1,928,"0 $1,844,213 (S 84,777) • includes options, contingencies and profits MM:au REF N920097.XLS EXHIBIT 2' _ Increase _ (Decrease) TASK/SUBTASCS Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 (1)Year 5 (2) Year 5 (3) Year 6 (1)Year 6 (2)Year 5-6 A. OFFSHORE WATER QUALITY MONITORING Cost ($) Monthly Chemical & Physical SarpLing 66,94 123,662 126,55 141,035 148,01 148,01 0 68 593 68,581 68581 Monthly Bacterial Sa HrI; 12 120 8,51 9,04 43,011 30,2 23,22 0 Quarterly Chemical & Physical Sampling 25 523 54 417 55 964 71,9 66,33 66,09 0 32,5 33 465 33465 Ocean Current Monitoring 32,08 204,62 201,904 291,41 301,03 204,61 0 0 0 Coliform SupLing Charges 0 0 0 11,25 0 0 0 Analyses 46,854 46.854 46.854 MO/Quarterly Re «s I 1 1 24,936 27,4481 27.4481 OA/OC 24,98 25,712 25,712 Program Management 20,549 20,549 20,54 Data Management 20 680 20,680 20 680 Total 136 6Fi 391,225 394,25 558,70 545,61 441,94 239,1 243 289 243,2 B. BENTHIC MONITORING Quarterly Saypting 26,80 51 107 57,03 60 501 63,10 63,10 81,5 57,95 57,95 (23,569) Quarterly Benthic Infaum Identification 78,401 115,72 122,83 130 485 136,1 136,1 137,14 136,8 136 829 (319) Quarterly Chemical & Ph sical Analysis 164,4 247,441 265,513 359,354 379,65 375,5 380,244 283 249 283,24 (96 995) Semiam t Bioaccu lotion 41,951 25,70 38,3 43,2 59,72 0 0 4,029, 4,029 4,029 Annual SaffpHrig 9,7911 9.3401 10,224 16,9411 10,0621 10,662 12,3151 11,70 11 763 (552) Annual eenthic infauna Identification 12.4 17,32 18.242;199764 09 20,809 20,809 19,245 19,24 (1 564) Anr t Chemical and Physical Analysis 48.3 64,15 70,09423 105,22 105,223 79,770 79,770 (25,453) Monthl QualityData R its 17,353 17,74G 17,74 OA/QC 114 957 115,275 115,2 Program Management 20,91 20,91 20,918 Data Management 15.497 15.497 15.497 Total 402,29 530,79 582,34267 710,964 737267 761 567 762 278 25 011 C. TRAWLSSemiamual Trawl Surve 16,653 21,672 23,58294 29,698 31 011 23 439 23 439 (7 5723 AMMI Histo atholog Studies 10 245 13,825 15.4363 26,333 26,6 28,21 26 679 471 Annual Priority Pollutant Sampling 52,4301 70,4251 76,558 100,4 125,6291 121,257 121.4811 98.048 98,048 (23,433) Data Reports 5,359 5,558 5,55 OA/OC 23,670 23,670 23,670 Program Management 5,184 5,1 5,1 Data Management 6,068 6,0 6,0 Total 79,32 105 922 115,5 143,74 181,65 177,2 179,10 189,98 188,646 9,54 EXHIBIT 2 (cont.) _ itterease (Decrease) TAS%/sue TAS%s Year 1 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 (1) Year 5 (2)Year 5 (3) Year 6 (1) Year 6 (2)Year 5-6 D. RIG FISHING Fish Cunsuaption Survey ___ 1 071 1.1 1,245 _ 1,344 1,579 1 579 7 579 1,14 7 1,14 - ( 432) Semiannual Fish Survey 6,843 12.5 13 079 _ 13,7991 13,711 13 734 if 632 12 958 72 780 (1,852) Semlamual Priority Pollutant Smy�l inq 9 586 14 1f2 15 O50 19,059 29 948 29 533 29 533 18 Gi5 18 L45 (11 O88) Amual xistapa tool ogy gtudits _ 3 415 3 TN L 897 5 774 8 451 8 490 8,492 9.61 8,74 311 Data Report 2.371 2,371 2,371 OA/W 4116 5I30 5130 Program Management 3,493 2,978 2,9781 Data Management 2,196 2,392 2.392 Total 20,9151 31.6141 34,271 39,9 53 709 53,336 54 236 54.3 53 98S- ( 253) E. DATA SLRa1RRY AND INTERPRETATION Quarterly ODES Report 4 498 62.42 77 169 80 003 87.1163 87.84 0 33,20 33,20 33,2 October 30 Ammol Report 13,22 12.5 13.32 4.2 7,02 6,63 0 9,851 9,055 9,05 January 30 Annual Report 47 089 74 968 80,00 133.12 174.98 198 312 198,31 149.02 149,02 (49,289) Data Storage, Management 97,819 11 1" O86 106.15 113 779 131.73 156.45 78.55 86,130 (67,653) A6ditional Annual Report Requiremicants 0 0 0 19 200 84,35 55,80 55,80 0 0 (55,802) MO/Management Report _ 10.0114 10 084 10.054 Program Management I I 1 32.5391 32,538 32.5381 Total 162.6341 247.075, 274 578 342.68 465.00 480,332 410.56 313.25 322 708 (87,859) F.ADDITIONAL SERVICES Liaison with of st ri c[/Mpnegemen[ 21 106 28,74 37,1 39 690 56,485 56.4 56,48 39 672 39 672 (ib 815) Quarterly acvicw Meeting With Districts 7 111 10 2G1 11,15 12.15 20 066 IB 600 18 600 16.90 ib 902 (1 698) Camera Ready Copy of Reports. 1 862 410 398 0 0 0 0 QC Document Review 0 0 0 3,65 5 963 4,81 4,81 (4,817) Permit Mai oh Assistance 0 0 0 5,154 7,0 0 0 np Contract Coleti on Activities 0 0 0 0 10 005 10 OOS 10 ODS (10 005) Program Memagpment 6 118 6,115 6.1181 Total 30 079 39,394 48 723 60 660 99 591 89 909 89,9 62 692 62,69 (27,217) Eguipoont ContiMemies _ 0 10.300 10,300 10,225 10,225 10.2 6.1 (6,132) Weather Contingerc les _ 0 10,300 10 300 10 225 10,225 10,225 6,13 (6,132 Options R Additi onol Studies 82,953 35,3D9' 110 676 55 949 0 0 0 44,769 44 769 Profin 37,824 128,549 126 276 11,9111 187,831 171 295 126,22 138 180 143,00 16 773 Total with AmeMrents A Op[Ionsl 1,002,705, 1,530,486 1,707,294 1,%2 265 21321.623 21145,523 1,6091570 1 759 210 1,821 36365 211,79 MM\au\excel\920096.%LS ' WATER QUALITY W/O CURRENTS CURREN 300 350 uo 300 1 200 1 M` x 0 150 0 200 0 iW a 0 130 50 0 IN Up50 0 1 _2 3 C 5(I) 5(3) 6(2) 0 1 2 3 4 5(1) 5(3) 8(2) BENTHIC TRAWL 900 200 r50 1!5 rE. 50 1 600 i u x Q 450 X U 100 0 300 0 15 50 2s 0 :. 0a 1 2 3 0 5(1) 5(0) 6(2) 1 2 3 3 5(1) 5(3) 6(2) RIGFISH DATA INTERPRETATION 6o su so- aso 40 375 77 a 0 30 a 0 300 0 0 2zs 0 20 0 150 0 75 0 0 1 2 3 a 5(1) 5(3) 6(2) 1 2 3 a 5(1) 5(3) 6(2) j l Districts estimated costs to asses SAIL Charges responsibility and to assist Exhibit 3 HISTORY OF OCEAN MONITORING CHARGES (Page 1 of 21 ADDITIONAL SERVICES 100 90. s0 1 )0 0 60 a 0 50 40 0 30 20 10 0 1 2 3 4 5(1) 5(3) 6(2) PROFIT zoo ns s0 1 125 x 0 100 0 0 vs w u 0 1 2 3 4 5(1) 5(3) 6(2) TOTAL COST 2400 21M 1800 500 x 00 1200 0 300 300 0 1 2 3 4 5(1) 5(3) 6(2) Districts estimated Costs to assume 11 SAIC Charges it responsibility and to assist Exhibit 3 HISTORY OF OCEAN MONITORING CHARGES pony 2 .1 -1 EXHIBIT 4 Districts- Estimated Sampling Costs Person Days Hrs/Day Hrs/Mo. Hrs/Yr. Dollars/Hr. Total/Yr. 4 14 56 672 34* $22,848 * $20/hr X 71% RE : AGENDA ITEM #14 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .1 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 1OSA4 Ews AVENUE io.BOA 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.GUECANIA 92728.8127 May 31, 1990 71.1952znt �../ n+n saxzsto REPORT OF CONSERVATION. RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE Meeting Date: May 31, 1990 - 5:30 a.m. COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Present: Hank Wedaa, Chairman J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager John C. Cox Blake P. Anderson, Director of Tech. Serv. Richard B. Edgar Thomas Dawes, Director of Engineering William D. Mahoney Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance Carrey J. Nelson Charles Nichols, Conservation, Peer A. Swan Reclamation and Reuse Manager Edna Wilson Robert Ooten, ASS'C. Superintendent, Operations Grace Winchell Ed Hodges, Senior Facl. Mgr. , Maintenance Absent: others Present: Iry Pickier Tom Woodruff, General Counsel Clarke Ide, Ass't. General Counsel 1) Opening Discussion Chairman Wedaa opened the meeting and asked the Committee members to introduce themselves and comment on their interest in the Committee's activities. Topics of special interest to the Directors included: • Opportunity for avoiding future capital investments in treatment facilities through water conservation savings. • Water reclamation opportunities, marketing, innovative technologies and local implementation. • Inter-jurisdictional cooperation on water and sludge management issues. • Treated sewage effluent as a resource or commodity. • Legislative liaison needed to enhance reclamation and reuse. • The benefits, and the need, to make water conservation happen. • Relationship of conservation, reclamation and reuse to energy management. • Range of water reclamation practices. v Report of the Conservation, May 31, 1990 Reclamation and Reuse Committee Page 2 of 3 Chairman Wedaa noted that he had met with staff to develop the discussion agenda for this meeting (copy attached) . He indicated that the items would be discussed in whatever manner was deemed desirable by the Committee members and that items not covered at this meeting would be continued to future meetings. Copies of the supporting agenda material are also enclosed. 2) Staffing Update In December, 1989, upon recommendation of this Committee, the Board approved additional staff for the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Division to help carry out the ambitious goals of the Districts' 30-year Action Plan adopted by the Directors last July. Charles Nichols, the division manager, reported on the status of staffing in his new division. In the division, there are a total of four positions authorized including manager, secretary and two principal environmental specialists. Three of the four positions are filled with one principal environmental specialist position still open. Advertising and interviewing continues for filling this position. 3) Water Conservation Activities A staff report on water conservation was begun by staff. After reporting on the drought status and overall reclamation activities of Orange County versus the rest of California, the focus of the Committee shifted to water reclamation. Further discussion of water conservation was continued to the next Committee meeting. 4) Water Reclamation Activities A. General Discussion of Water Reclamation Implementation Plan Staff reviewed information on the proposed Southern California wastewater reclamation "Backbone" system. This is a developing federal program to create a regional network of conveyance pipelines for reclaimed water. The Directors expressed support for such a system. Discussion of the regional system led into a review of the local water reclamation network known as the Green Acres Project, currently under construction by the Orange County Water District. At a future meeting, staff will arrange for a briefing on Orange County's water system infrastructure. Staff updated the Directors on the most feasible sites in the Anaheim Forebay for construction of a new water reclamation plant and the status of site acquisition for potential water reclamation plants. The Directors emphasized the approach of developing a state-of-the-art demonstration facility, one which could serve as a model throughout the county and the state. S Report of the Conservation, May 31, 1990 Reclamation and Reuse Committee Page 3 of 3 The Committee reviewed staff's suggested Reclamation Implementation Plan. During the discussion, the Directors asked staff to revise the draft to include alternative plans. One plan would move forward on a broad multi- faceted front of local and regional water reclamation activities, while the alternate would approach the reclamation activities in a phased, sequential manner. Staff will, by the next Committee meeting, draft alternate implementation plans and outline the resource implications of each. B. Authorization to Negotiate for Acquisition of Water Reclamation Sites The staff discussed the potential sites in the Anaheim Forebay for construction of a water reclamation plant. The discussion focused on the primary site owned by Waste Water Disposal Company located in the City of Fullerton in the vicinity of State College Boulevard and Orangethorpe Avenue. The staff then reviewed an appraisal that had been performed on the 5-6 acre parcel and sought authorization to negotiate for the parcel and for adjacent properties for potential future expansions if the market opportunities develop for reclaimed water. Recommendation: The Committee recommends that the staff and counsel be authorized to negotiate with property owners for acquisition of a site or sites for water reclamation plants in the general vicinity of the Anaheim Forebay based upon appraisals for such properties. 5) Sludge Management Activities Review of sludge management activities was continued to a future meeting. 6) Future Committee Meetings The Committee members determined that meetings would be held as needed on the fourth Thursday of the month. CGN:hc Ref. #030064.RP `� Attachment May 25, 1990 DISCUSSION OUTLINE CONSERVATION. RECLAMATION & REUSE COMMITTEE MAY 31, 1990 I. Opening Discussion A. Self-Introductions & Background/Interest in Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Issues B. Committee Purpose Attachments II. Staffing Update for New Conservation, Goldenrod Reclamation and Reuse Division III. Current Water Conservation Activities Salmon A. Status Update 1. The Drought 2. County-wide Conservation Status 3. MWD Conservation Credits Program 4. ^Miniflush" Performance Report 5. In-Plant Water Use and Conservation B. Draft Conservation Plan 1. EPA/State Grant Program 2. Education Program 3 . Industrial, Commercial and Institutional Initiatives 4 . Initiatives in Residential Water Conservation C. Conservation Implementation Plan D. Phase II Consulting Services 1. Scope, Schedule & Budget IV. Current Water Reclamation Activities Blue A. Status Update 1. AS 1312- Water Reclamation Bond Issue 2. Southern California Waste Water Reclamation "Backbone" System B. Waste Water Disposal Company Site Acquisition Status C. Reclamation Implementation Plan V. Current Sludge Management Activities Green A. Status Update 1. Sludge Production and Distribution a. RECYC Composting b. Curti Composting C. PIMA GRO Agricultural Land Application d. BKK Landfilling 2. Coyote Canyon Landfill Closure and Sludge Soil Amendment 3. New Cooperative Ventures a. Central Valley Agricultural Land Application b. Co-Composting With Orange County �s✓ C. Co-Composting With Village Nurseries 4. Regulatory Liaison _ a. AS 939/AB 1820- Integrated Solid Waste Management Act �a✓ b. AS 2295- Sludge as Agricultural Fertilizer C. BLM Sludge Land Ban Policy d. EPA Sludge Regs B. Sludge Management Implementation Plan VI. Appendices A. MWD Conservation Credits Program White B. Draft Water Conservation Plan Canary C. Waste Water Disposal Company site Grey Appraisal Letter CGN:hc Ref. #030074.RP STAFFING UPDATE FOR NEW CONSERVATION. _ RECLAMATION AND REUSE DIVISION In mid-December of 1989, the Districts' Board of Directors approved a staffing plan for the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse (CRR) Division which authorized the addition of two professional staff members to focus on water reclamation and conservation issues. Immediately after that authorization, working with the Personnel Division, we posted the notice for the two positions and advertised in local newspapers. At the same time, realizing that our needs would be narrowly focused, advertisements were placed in the American Water Works Association Journal and the California Department of Water Resources - Water Conservation News. As it turns out, our best response from interested persons has been from these two specialty advertisements. As a result of this recruitment process, we screened the candidate pool and interviewed a total of 11 prospective employees. At this time, we have been able to fill one of the two positions. Michelle Merritt has begun work focusing on the Districts' water conservation programs. Among the other 10 candidates interviewed, two were qualified for the position and we attempted to hire them. Unfortunately, we were unsuccessful, as each person had been offered other, higher paying jobs of a similar nature which they accepted. At this time, we are continuing to advertise and accept applications for the remaining position. 1 CURRENT CONSERVATION ACTIVITIES A. STATUS UPDATE 1. THE DROUGHT. For the fourth year in a row (1986-1990) , California has experienced below normal rainfall, precipitating what has been called the worst dry spell on record. The only longer dry spell ocurring this century was from 1929 to 1934 . Even if we had been experiencing normal rainfall and runoff patterns for the past four years, the addition of nine million people in California since 1970 still would seriously tax an already burdened water delivery system. To understand the significance of this drought, we have charted the state Department of Water Resources' (DWR) annual precipitation rating. The DWR rates each year based on runoff into the Sacramento River Basin which supplies most of the water . for the State Water Project. Exhibit 1 shows these ratings for the past 30 years. As shown in the exhibit, six of the past ten years including 1990, have been dry or critically dry. Even though each Californian is using less water today per capita than in 1970, officials of the Metropolitan Water District say that Southern Californians still face the prospects of a continuing water shortage because of our booming population, even during years of normal to above average precipitation. Current projections are that if Southern California continues to grow at its present rate, the currently available water supply may fall short of demand for six of the next ten years, even if rain and snowfall are normal. Despite these projections, water officials expect to ship Southern California the same amount that it received last year. However, losses from other sources signal that. the situation is getting more serious each year. A perhaps, not so coincidental dry spell in the Upper Colorado Basin, the source of water from the Colorado River, has cut the Colorado's flow to 45% of normal, the lowest it has been since 1906. Also, this year Arizona has exercised its legal right to Colorado River water that last year made its way through the California Aqueduct to Southern California. Southern California, particularly the City of Los Angeles, is also losing some of its supply from the Owens Valley and Mono Lake diversions. Los Angeles used to get nearly 75% of its supply from these eastern Sierra sources. Recent court decisions have stated that Los Angeles' thirst has damaged the ecology of 2 I - Critically Dry 2 - Dry EXHIBIT 1 3 - Below Normal 4 - Above Normal DWR ANNUAL PRECIPITATION RATING 5 - Wet 5 4 3 2 1 0 f 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 ( ) 3 ) Mono Lake and destroyed fisheries in the area. The drought in the eastern Sierras has also reduced Owens Valley runoff, further lessening the main Los Angeles water supply. Consequently, Los Angeles plans to buy about 60% of its water this year from the Metropolitan Water District, leaving MWD about 12% short for its other customers. Many cities, particularly San Bernardino, Riverside, several in the San Gabriel Valley and north and central Orange County, pump a majority of their water from underground aquifers and rely on the state water projects only to supplement their supply. However, many wells in these areas have been closed because of chemical contamination and lack of rainfall has lowered the water table. A wet year with heavy rains and better than average snowfall in the local and northern mountains could alleviate some problems, but another year of drought would pose serious problems even for these areas. The current situation has caused MWD and its member water agencies to encourage a 10% cut in water use, first through a voluntary program of water conservation. If the voluntary program is successful, the current 12% shortfall could be made up through voluntary savings. Other cities have taken a more aggressive position. The city of Los Angeles has imposed a mandatory water rationing plan complete with a "drought buster" enforcement program and surcharges for excess use. Santa Barbara, which relies almost exclusively on local rainfall for its water supply, is facing an even more critical problem and has imposed severe penalties for violating their 45% mandatory rationing program which forbids lawn watering, landscape irrigation with anything but drip irrigation or greywater, car washing, and imposes severe penalties for offenders. 2. COUNTY-WIDE CONSERVATION STATUS. These circumstances have led to a variety of actions in Orange County. Several cities and water agencies serving Orange county have implemented or proposed ordinances calling for voluntary water conservation. The following matrix, Exhibit 2, lists the types of programs that have been implemented and some of the major elements of those programs. In addition to the measures reported in Exhibit 2, the Orange County Water Conservation Task Force was formed earlier this year and contains representatives from business, industry and government. Focusing mainly on landscaping and irrigation conservation, the Task Force has prepared a draft ordinance for the Board of Supervisors that requires developers to submit a water management plan before getting permits to build new development projects in the county. The Draft report calls for 4 eXHIUIl P LIST OF COUNTY-WIDE WATER CONSERVATION GROGRAM v.1LE 5tl kP a Se Q ! �—Ol S Y g oql -FILEY 'SQ 8Q �W :� iAx 5d :b I'll of FREE". OIII OF pIF [III 01 A.E.... TOSIA ll. CONSOL nLC .OS CITE OF IYN IF4 VALLEY luw "R CIII OF IULLIrtP FF.OragM OrClmm In IN wm .11 OI w.ol.aert ,.IT of .wn.mP IEFTE -.e.[. 1. n.e el.. m IT.w.0 Clll OI YVIxF TIFF OI LETTER FIFCx L.E— loa.W[rt 01[]r ltt RE 1111 OF Ll.1.JRFA CIII OF a Plo 1111 OI FOR FLMIIM E.. I.F. Wtp I.. Cp..pmun ISi CIT 0 .1-1 IdCx g00 pa lun Pr n. FEE. e Clll OI ggpL LIFT OF IYCLx1IF CIII OI LW4 FP CIT 01 R4 IL¢x 1.ONl— C111 OI 11S11. 1111 OF VILLF x IT Svnm Irg pllm O1.[rlu SIFT OI YLST.gil[. [I if OF IP.F LINER 7—TER AGENTHS F. OF SN COUNTY x CO.S10-FILE OISTSIpi ct IYW 5 guidelines governing the kind of vegetation that could be planted, the irrigation equipment to be used and the landscape maintenance plan to be implemented. Other sections of the report address long term solutions, including forming a permanent advisory group on water issues. Other Task Force suggestions include a new residential billing system based on the number of people in the household and the amount of landscape area on the property. Users who exceeded their allocation would be assessed fees, the proceeds of which would be funneled back into a conservation advertising campaign. The final first phase report will be available in June 1990. From the media coverage on water conservation and several of the new or updated conservation programs, we have summarized the recommended water conservation practices. Exhibit 3 lists such recommendations for inside and outside the home. Lastly, in April of this year, the Orange County Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution asking citizens, governments and businesses to voluntarily cut water consumption by 10%. The resolution provided a list of 10 conservation steps which could be easily taken by Orange Countians. 3 . MWD WATER CONSERVATION CREDITS PROGRAM. As a part of inventorying the water status in the region, one invariably makes it to the doorstep of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) . In so doing, staff has learned of the Water Conservation Credits Program. Appendix A supplies a brief introduction to the conservation credits program. The essence of MWD's water conservation credits program is to provide financial incentives for water conservation projects through member agencies. The program is similar to MWD's Local Projects Program which focuses on reclaiming water. MWD will pay for project water savings, based on their avoided cost of aqueduct pumping, up to one-half of the cost of each qualifying water conservation project. This value is based on the avoided energy cost of pumping state project water through the East Branch. Sanitation Districts' staff is working directly with the MWD manager of the water conservation credits program and local member agencies. 4 . "MINIFLUSH" PERFORMANCE REPORT. At the CRSR's last meeting, staff made available to the Directors a toilet retrofit water conservation device, known as the "Miniflush Water Saver. -- Constructed of heavy plastic, the Miniflush may be installed in many toilet tanks and can save between 2.3 and 5 gallons of water per flush, depending on the water capacity of the toilet tank. Forty eight units were provided to the Directors and staff who have been testing them over the past several months. �.r 6 EXHIBIT 3 �.. ..r List of Voluntary Water Conservation Program Recommendations Inside The Home Outside The Home Install low-flow plumbing Restaurants serve water only fixtures on request Fix leaky pipes & faucets Turn off decorative fountains unless a water Take shorter showers - turn recycling system is used off water while soaping down Install pool and spa covers Wash only full loads in washing machine & dishwasher Avoid watering lawns & gardens during peak hours Don't let water run while (usually 10 a.m - 4 p.m. ) shaving or brushing teeth and on windy days to minimize evaporation Add displacement devices to toilet tanks Don't hose down driveways, sidewalks or patios except Don't use your toilet as a for health or sanitary "flushable wastebasket" purposes Keep drinking water in the Plant drought resistant refrigerator landscaping Prevent gutter flooding Adjust automatic sprinklers to avoid flooding Deep soak lawn rather than light sprinkling Install efficient irrigation systems, if possible Don't let water run while washing car Use mulch around trees and plants 7 Recently, we checked with the individuals who received the Miniflush units to determine their opinions on the performance of the devices. A summary of responses is shown in Exhibit 4. It is interesting to note that 32% of the participants did not install the device due to the confusing instructions, product appearance and improper fit. Also, the participant's subjective opinion on the performance of the units was slightly weighted towards the negative rather than the positive. It should be noted that 24% of the original recipients were not reached during the survey. 5. IN-PLANT WATER USE AND CONSERVATION. The Sanitation Districts uses water for a variety of activities and needs. The use of water can be categorized into three types including city or potable water, industrial or reclaimed water and plant water (chlorinated secondary clarifier effluent) . Also, the Sanitation Districts supplies considerable volumes of plant water to the Orange County Water District (OCWD) for further processing and ultimately subsurface injection as a seawater intrusion barrier. From research of the Districts' records, we have summarized city water use for the 1980's. Exhibit 5 charts the growth of city water use during the 1980 's as new treatment facilities and personnel have been added. At Plant 1, city water use from Fountain Valley has grown from .014 mgd (15.7 AF/yr, ) in 1984 to . 128 mgd (143. 6 AF/yr. ) projected for fiscal year 189/190. This growth in water use amounts to a 914% increase and results from several water intensive facility additions including sludge dewatering, physical/chemical wastewater treatment and air scrubbers. At Plant 2, city water use from Huntington Beach grew from . 03 mgd (33.7 AF/yr. ) in 1981 to .28 mgd (314.2 AF/yr. ) projected for fiscal 1989/90. This amounted to a 933% increase and results from similar plant additions as at Plant 1. Although these are large percentage increases in city water, it is anticipated that as much as 70% of these water volumes can and will be converted to reclaimed water from the OCWD. This reclaimed or industrial water substitution will return the Sanitation Districts to pre-1987 levels at Plant 1 and pre-1983 levels at Plant 2 . Connection to the OCWD reclaimed water supply at Plant 1 is anticipated in late 1991. The connection will be possible when the OCWD Green Acres project is complete and the Sanitation Districts' have completed upgrading the city water system in Plant 1. The Plant 1 system is being upgraded as part of the P1-34 project to provide a separate pumping and pipeline network for the city water and the reclaimed water. The uses expected for the reclaimed water include polymer mixing in sludge dewatering, physical/chemical treatment, air scrubbers and for washdown. 8 EXHIBIT 4 SUMMARY OF MINIFLUSH SYSTEM PERFORMANCE Total Number of Units Distributed 48 Total Number of Units Confirmed Installed 19 Total Number of Recipients 25 Recipients Installing Units 11 Recipients Not Installing Units 8 Recipients Not Reached During Survey 6 Recipients' Opinion on Performance Excellent 1 Good 2 Fair 9 Poor 3 Lousy 3 No Opinion 7 9 � EXHIBIT 5 CITY WATER CONSUMPTION ❑ Plant No. 1 f Plant No. 2 .30 .25 .20 Mgd .15 .10 .05 .00 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 Fiscal Year 10 Connection to the OCWD reclaimed water supply at Plant 2 is anticipated sometime in 1994. To accomplish this tie in, the OCWD Green Acres Phase 2 project will be extended along the Santa Ana ...r River into Huntington Beach. The 1994 target has been set by the OCWD. In addition to the change over to reclaimed water for many of the treatment plant systems, staff will be taking steps in the next few months to further conserve water in-plant. These steps will include the following: 1. A complete updated inventory of water uses and fixtures at the Districts; 2 . Immediate repair of any leaking pipes, faucets or fixtures; 3. Immediate adjustments of any excessive or misdirected irrigation systems; 4. Operations analysis of further conservation opportunities . such as charging the secondary clarifier process, recirculating water through the odor scrubbers in lieu of a single pass; 5. As appropriate, retrofit Districts' water fixtures with low flow devices; 6. Complete a Districts' employee education program on water conservation practices; 7. Institute changes to landscaping as appropriate to prevent unwise water use; 8. Complete and implement a Xeriscape plan for Districts' landscaping; 9. Revise Districts' standard construction specifications to reflect the latest water conserving technology and plant associations design consistent with recent landscaping ordinances and practices; 10. Seek and obtain MWD conservation credits. The measures listed above will be the primary responsibility of the CR&R Division's new principal environmental specialist. B. DRAFT CONSERVATION PLAN 1. EPA/STATE GRANT. During the early 1980% the Sanitation Districts accepted an EPA monetary grant, #1073-150, administered through the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Clean Water Grant Program. As a condition of these grants, the Governor ordered the SWRCB to implement water conservation programs. The grant regulations required the Sanitation Districts to complete a flow reduction analysis and implement specific water conservation measures. A portion of this work was performed in the recent master plan update and a draft summary report focusing on water conservation has been prepared. The draft report is attached as Appendix B. This draft report has been forwarded to the SWRCB Office of Loans and Grants. However, we have not yet received any 11 �„� response from the agency. 2. EDUCATION PROGRAM. At the Sanitation Districts, water conservation awareness is blended into all tours of the treatment plant. This education process includes a 13-minute film on water use and conservation in and around the home. Also, the Sanitation Districts is currently co-sponsoring a kindergarten through sixth grade science curriculum on environmental quality awareness. The program includes water conservation themes and the importance of wise water use. The program also stresses the concept of personal responsibility toward our environment. 3. INDUSTRIAL. COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL INITIATIVES. The Introduction and Summary of the Sanitation Districts' 1989 revised 'Wastewater Discharge Regulations" states that two of the primary goals of the Ordinance are: • To require the reduction of water discharged to the sewer system. • To require waste minimization and material substitution for industrial users. The Sanitation Districts have, since the late 1970 % encouraged water conservation as a means to reduce the size of its pollution control facilities and reduce the cost of operation both in water purchased and wastewater discharged. The Sanitation Districts' industrial waste inspectors are field oriented and have provided technical assistance to a variety of dischargers on manufacturing process changes that may reduce the wastewater discharge without suffering a loss in product quality. Suggestions on better rinsing techniques and reuse or recycle of water to a less critical use are in the technical repertoire of the inspectors and the Sanitation Districts' engineers. The inspectors also enforce the prohibition against single pass cooling water requiring recycle to a cooling tower or air cooler, a chilled water system, or reuse of the water in another piece of equipment in the manufacturing process. The Sanitation Districts ' waste discharge permit system prevents dilution and wasting water from being used to meet discharge limits. The permit limit is based on mass emission rates, the average wastewater flow and concentration of the pollutant. When a discharger is sampled on a particular day to determine if they are in compliance with the permit limits, they cannot just turn up the rinse water to dilute the concentrations. Future plans to encourage and require water conservation among the Sanitation Districts' industrial, commercial and institution dischargers will be done as part of the Sanitation Districts' waste minimization program. A multi-agency task force of the Orange County Health Care Agency Waste Management Section, the South Coast r 12 Air Quality Management Agency, and the Sanitation Districts has assembled to provide a multi-media land, air and water approach to waste minimization. The Sanitation Districts implemented in .... January 1990, permit requirements for a waste minimization plan and enforcement requirements for waste minimization audits for chronic non-compliant dischargers. The planned emphasis of the Sanitation Districts will first focus on industrial water conservation techniques to reduce the wastewater flow. Industries will either implement waste minimization and water conservation techniques or be required to submit a report explaining why they cannot achieve these goals. Eventually, as more firms show that water conservation is practical, the Sanitation Districts hope to base future waste discharge permit limits on the expected flow with water conservation rather than permit limits based on present discharges. After completion of these steps with the 450 first priority industries, the Sanitation Districts will turn its focus toward commercial and institutional discharges. These are a much larger number of discharging entities typified as having significantly lower wastewater flows per employee or per square foot of floor space. 4. INITIATIVES IN RESIDENTIAL WATER CONSERVATION. The Sanitation Districts' newly adopted water conservation policy states: • Actively foster and promote water conservation; • Develop cooperative programs with other public agencies to provide public education, community use of water-saving devices, amend plumbing codes, and other appropriate changes to help reduce water usage. To achieve the Sanitation Districts' water conservation goals, eight major steps need to be taken. These steps include accurate definition of the Sanitation Districts' facilities, evaluation of conservation alternatives, evaluation of political and institutional factors affecting conservation implementation, survey of existing conservation programs as examples, research and demonstration of conservation devices and development of information and education programs. This will produce a comprehensive and detailed conservation plan and policy for consideration and implementation by the Boards. After implementation, routine monitoring will provide the Sanitation Districts with an understanding of the results being achieved. This monitoring will provide an ongoing assessment of flow increases to be used in determining timing of construction for trunk and treatment plant expansions. 13 r.r C. WATER CONSERVATION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN �r To achieve the objectives set forth above, the Sanitation Districts need to carefully develop an implementation plan; one that is balanced, applying the optimum amount of resources (staff, consultants and contractors) at the most efficient pace to accomplish the authorized tasks. Staff has evaluated the needs for plan implementation and developed an approach for the Director's consideration summarized in Exhibit 6. Over the next year, staff and a consultant would determine specific in-plant water conservation measures including a Districts' xeriscape plan. Also, the team would evaluate water conservation projects to be developed or implemented jointly with other area agencies or to be handled exclusively by the Districts. The culmination of this task would be a Conservation Projects Plan. D. CONSULTANT SCOPE To complete the work identified in Exhibit 6 at the pace suggested, the Districts would need to obtain the services of a consultant specializing in water conservation practices. A consultant would be needed to handle some of the specialized work in which Districts' personnel are not trained or experienced. In Exhibit 7, we have listed tasks which are recommended for consultant action. A preliminary estimate of fees for these services was placed at $145, 000. These expenditures over a year would average about 3/4 of an individual 's time per month. 14 IAor P1 e�iwn i,wTG�1,ea�fsi ttiV7ties- IB lf3r_leucltlar_ldlnl�aitlevH75eo l4QTIQes Len e A ERR E._Ilpt7p�5�n7F(!-C�mpa'rRLAY_. .v __c ongyJ de )e e F . A3 1f1 4r-s ( HaSQ 9Pser Prl3ernat lve. E� fYEY o.0 Pa Ef [PJIaR. NlH4 SP.arn aaaa♦ HCL t_ � 3 — [ Ionast_ _Hd4sEc���adnPJfe3el s Inventyrae¢sLYrlraaMat � �aoaseRarl Ll4 dr sedr[n 97�tnl2rw[ion on sssseeeerrrr a� IDd nervation _ IhY1HEs -. {Erlllllt ➢.. Iernat 3 SPp rgfY➢I1VH_I ILernetlm wn11P-1LIHrPd1.lPf13HH.. an Jotnl VELIHCESW3aFv 2 34—alm ndlL-Sn4l�tc1il _lnelllt vatagn A Port pQNS,nedPlVAi�017 n4P4ory plstr s vat 7�9 4ldiEt�Q.aa lf2 &@@dS iHPa.Sa l Y a i P.Servation 4aP➢Ltyy99�J219 IIL. refit Pont__ — I[41lL.HIgIr1P[a�1!t!Pes � IPYEE19LSdLH^ QInH_tleltr _ [[yt pan _ CC 1IggE3fi gervat 1P g�I' 1p9 t flpW[ I'S plae NOts ak yP3nes teltlslr-1[F LIanOSaHIP$ �a3lain_LIxV.SHHM vv"I! rrEaltS _.._ -- N 7.11aNA% CIMINFPCLLI.INPNti19L6 _ . Jss)pin9lasrg Sa p5 agtLrPinsH__ .. __.after too 1.6P_PPIEt€1 _ _ 1A`e_IINNIIAL t�IB0flI$ - 4cY1NIVaf in91 totF t ! mterPlnea a ! r (ash I eeq letcl ANIIlR 8 SI�GGE5IEG Wa1FP CGNSWVai IOH I FIVI Y'MEII I:.I lull 1+1 ifl EXHIBIT 7 LIST OF CONSERVATION CONSULTANT TASKS 1. Identify and evaluate conservation alternatives 2 . Survey and Inventory water conservation programs 3 . List of Orange County/Southern California water purveyors 4. Map jurisdictions 5. Meet with water purveyors 6. Create strategy for CSDOC participation in water management planning 7. Create inventory of urban water management plans 8. Library research of information on water issues 9. Survey and inventory of water conservation policies 10. Research and demonstration of conservation devices 11. Determine cost-effectiveness of conservation alternatives 12. Develop joint venture conservation projects with regional utilities 13. Develop conservation financing plan 14 . CEQA Process 15. Operations analysis of conservation opportunities in treatment 16. Employee education regarding water conservation 17. Complete Districts' xeriscape plan 18. Revise landscaping bid documents 16 CURRENT RECLAMATION ACTIVITIES A. STATUS UPDATE 1. AS 1312. During the fall of 1989, water reclamation agencies formulated a proposal for a $200 million statewide water reclamation plant bond issue. This proposal was supported by a survey of water reclamation plant needs in California of over $2 billion. The Sanitation Districts and many of its member agencies adopted resolutions of support for this measure which were then forwarded to the legislative delegation in Sacramento. At this time, AB 1312 languishes in Sacramento on hold until after the June elections. Depending on the outcome of bond initiatives in June, AB 1312 may be added to the fall ballot. In the water industry, there exists considerable diversity of opinion on how likely this measure is to reach the voters. 2. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WASTE WATER RECLAMATION BACKBONE SYSTEM. As a matter of information, the staff has learned of a new proposal initiated by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) to develop a regional reclaimed waste water transportation network. The legislative proposal would determine the feasibility of constructing a regional "backbone" distribution system thereby providing a pool of high quality reclaimed water for a variety of uses. As presently envisioned, the backbone system could exist in at least 6 counties, including Orange, Los Angeles, San Diego, San Bernardino, Riverside and Imperial. The proposal has been slated for introduction to the U.S. Senate as a four year, $3 million effort. Funding would be split 50/50 with local interests. At this time, staff is monitoring the progress of this legislation utilizing our networks in CASA and AMSA. Exhibit 8 attached offers a schematic diagram of a possible backbone system. B. WASTE WATER DISPOSAL COMPANY SITE ACQUISITION The Committee is aware that for the past couple of years, the Districts' staff and staff of the Orange County Water District have jointly investigated sites for the development of a reclamation plant. The work was included in the 1989 Master Plan which examined some 19 sites and targeted three sites as highest priority. The reclamation plant would include primary and secondary wastewater treatment plus dissolved mineral reduction with a final end product essentially meeting drinking water standards. Solids would be returned to the sewer for processing at either the Fountain Valley or Huntington Beach treatment plants. `/ 17 EXHIBIT B SoUTIMN CALIFORNU WASTE WATI R KERNj BACKBONE SYSTEM.,..........� ..^....... e......j C SAN BERNARDINO Pyramid Lake ° -i•___ _ j siverwood Low 1 '•rca.k.h, Bouquet VENTURA\ Lake Ras, ; SAN BERNARDINO rSJ :' LOS ANCELES i ;..... �.... ..Luke-pwtie...,n ................................... .. ij.. ...i • flNEillldE - R i��r , e ^` _�..1,��• LOS ANGELES ,N1 too------ RANGE hfliews f__ .. i•••••. sultan _ RIVERSIDE Sea .... ......(............ ...,: :........................................... SAN OIEGO IMPERIAL sm� Vinc ade Lawar � � -° PROPOSED WASTE WATER Otay -,- BACKBONE SYSTEM SAN DIE00-------- California Aqueduct """'— Loe Angelee Aqueduct '_"""'" Colorado River Aqueduct -------- Coachella Canal d All American Canal "------ San Diego Aqueduct l k3 The highest priority site is the Crescent Basin project. .� Considerable amount of preliminary analysis has been conducted on this site and the pros and cons of the site are well understood. Subsequent to the adoption of the 1989 Master Plan, a nearby site was identified by staff as an alternate. The site, owned by Waste Water Disposal Company, is about 5-3/4 acres, located on State College Boulevard just south of Orangethorpe Avenue. The Waste Water Disposal site has some advantages over the Crescent Basin site. The largest advantage is that it is not adjacent to a residential community. It offers the same advantages for injecting water in the groundwater basin and supplying water to the nearby industrial community. The Crescent Basin site has an advantage by being adjacent to the "Dad" Miller Golf Course which could receive the reclaimed water. Staff has secured an appraisal (attached) for the site. Based on earlier discussions with this committee as well as the Directors at large, staff is attempting to meet with the directors of the Waste Water Disposal Company to review the appraisal as well as the terms of a possible purchase. Several meetings have been scheduled and canceled. As of this writing, a meeting is tentatively planned for May 30. During the committee meeting, staff will report in detail on the progress of the acquisition of the site and the results of the above-noted meeting. C. RECLAMATION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN As presented above under conservation, staff has evaluated the needs for reclamation implementation and developed an approach for the Directors- consideration. The Districts- water reclamation goals are more concrete and substantive than its conservation goals and therefore, reflects more activity. Exhibit 9 shows an abbreviated summary of a suggested approach with its schedule. During the next year, staff will focus its attention on updating our water agreement with the OCWD, assisting engineering with siting of a new water reclamation plant in Fullerton and finalizing a feasibility report on the Crescent Basin water reclamation plant. During 1991, staff would investigate a regional water reclamation network, followed by in 1992 evaluating a Lower Santa Ana River wetlands restoration project. In March of 1993, staff would begin a project evaluating new water reclamation treatment and distribution technologies which would be completed in two years. `/ 19 -. la wn�-:rtniwt;�nlMw..�x�ul��i;r4ow,i.wrw,i�'11wun w,l i„wri�rnw irw�w�w"Swn,n�w,w,i�'bn W ir.i.,imiN9wis,.iar w.x„uxr.L.iwL�n i�i�iwi>roinr w.iariJtr.n.i«��imw�wna_ su:w°4iYmlt 1pP —sm uim nni vri(n.._— o ....NLI_LL4Pf•¢ .-�. NSlu llRanr� llt ��L � � um���m� u....wm��m ar i...� v .w•.•Fomm..a.nmi _ �cJo YT p ��p III O J I�ILhL[r� L�C� i EEIR,w c..�raP R,In in,°�l„W„I .0W1„t 4111r1 ='YZ r'a I�h"6 � HUHHEBTEO FSIIR� RECLPM<TIOM CURRENT SLUDGE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES A. STATUS UPDATE 1. sludge Production and Distribution. For the last year and a half, 52% of the Sanitation Districts' sludge has been recycled while 48% has been added to refuse in landfills. In the recycling category, we have maintained 36% of our sludge delivered to composting and 16% of our sludge delivered for agricultural land application. Recently, all of the Districts' sludge that is being landfilled is being delivered to the BKK landfill in West Covina. At this time, no sludges are being delivered to Coyote Canyon due to it being closed to sludge. 2 . Coyote Canyon Landfill Closure. In March of this year, the Orange County Integrated Waste Management Department, which operates Orange County landfills, opened the new Bee Canyon landfill and significantly reduced the flow of solid waste to Coyote Canyon landfill. At that time, the IWMD began the closure process for the landfill. The Sanitation Districts' have proposed to the IWMD to use the Districts' sludge as a portion of the final landfill cover. The final cover will be approximately6-feet thick which includes a top soil layer of 2.5-feet for growing plants. The Districts' sludge would be an excellent material to blend with other soil planned for this top layer. Sludge would add nutrients, would increase the organic humus content of the soil and improve the water holding capacity of the soil. Much research of this type of project has occurred and .this research has shown that sludge blended with locally available sandy soil will improve the survival and health of plants installed by the IWMD. The IWMD is expected to finalize its landfill closure plan this summer and begin the closure process later this year. The closure activities should last about 18 months. 3 . New Cooperative Ventures. As a part of pursuing sludge management options for Board consideration, the CRR division staff has been proceeding on three new cooperative ventures in sludge reuse. Two are local, while one is in the central California valley. The central valley project would be an agricultural land application project similar to the Districts' current projects in the Palo Verde Valley area of eastern California and the Yuma area in Arizona. Staff has visited several prospective farmers in the central valley and have earned favorable receptions. We have been . asked by these farmers to propose demonstration projects. Staff is formulating project plans and proposals which would be forwarded to 20 the farmers. The two local projects are co-composting proposals, one with the IWMD of the county and one with Village Nurseries. Composting is the biological decomposition of organic matter at an elevated temperature. Co-composting is a term applied to the blend of sludge and yard waste material such as tree prunings, leaves, grasses, etc. When these materials are combined and composted one has maximized the reuse opportunity. At the county each year, they receive several hundred thousand tons of yard waste which could be composted with the Districts' sludge. Staff is working with the IWMD' s recycling manager to develop a project to bring these two materials together. on a much smaller scale, the local nursery generates several thousand tons of yard waste annually which could also be blended with sludge to make compost. Several advantage accrue from such a project including 1) reduction of yard waste going to the landfill which saves landfill space and dollars, 2) recycling of yard waste and sludge on the nursery property which reduces the need for imported soil products which also reduces use of petroleum products which lessens energy use, improves air quality and saves dollars. Staff is working with the nursery management to develop a project to bring these two materials together. 4 . Regulatory Liaison. A significant portion of staff time recently has focused on managing state legislation that affects the Districts' sludge management. At the state level, a recent legislative proposal, AB 1820, would amend last year's Integrated Solid Waste Management Act (AB 939) . Before our involvement, including testimony before a state Senate hearing of the Natural Resources and Wildlife Committee, the measure would not have allowed cities and counties to get recycling credit for any sludges that were recycled. Clearly, this approach is not a recycling incentive. During April and May, staff in concert with CASA and other agencies, successfully modified the bill to eliminate the sludge recycling credits exclusion after 1991. In the intervening period, state agencies with the assistance of CASA and Tri-TAC members, including the Sanitation Districts, will review the safety of sludge management and make any recommendations for changes that may be appropriate. At the federal level, the Bureau of Land Management in the Department of the Interior has issued a policy statement dunning municipal sewage sludge application to any lands under their jurisdiction. Obviously, this policy is extremely negative and the POTW community including the Sanitation Districts is actively attempting to have BLM change this policy. EPA continues to develop a final proposal for sludge management !� regulations. The agency will issue results of a nationwide survey 21 of sludge quality later this year followed by issuance of the regulations in October 1991. B. SLUDGE MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN As presented above as part of conservation and reclamation, staff has evaluated the needs for sludge management implementation and developed an approach for the Directors' consideration. A completed sludge management implementation plan will be distributed at the committee meeting. CGN:hc Ref. #030077.RP v 22 : v APPENDIX A MWD CONSERVATION CREDITS PROGRAM �✓ � '� ll9W0 METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CARFORNIA September 21, 1988 All Member Agencies General Manager Water Conservation Credits Program--Request for Proposals On September 20. 1988 Metropolitan' s Board approved the implementation of a "Water Conservation Credits" program, which will provide financial incentives for water conservation projects . In taking this action, the Board authorized the General Manager to seek proposals from our member agencies for participation in this program. You are invited to submit proposals that meet the qualifications defined in the attached Board letter dated August 8 , 1988 (Attachment 1) . The program is similar to Metropolitans Local Projects Program. Metropolitan will pay for project water savings, based on our avoided cost of aqueduct pumping, up to one-half of the cost of each qualifying water conservation project. The value of aqueduct pumping will be based on the avoided energy cost of pumping State project water through the East Branch, subject to a minimum level of $75 per acre-foot. This year , the minimum $75 value will be used . Sample calculations to illustrate how the conservation credits would be determined are shown in attachments to the Board letter . To qualify for the Conservation Credits program, a water conservation project must: 1. Have demonstrable water savings; 2. Reduce demands on Metropolitan; 3 . Be technically sound: 4 . Have local support; and All Member Agencies -2- September 21 , 1986 5 . Metropolitan ' s participation must be necessary to make the project financially and economically feasible. Each proposal will be considered on a case-by-case basis , leading to an agreement with the appropriate member agencies and subagencies. For your assistance, I have attached an outline (Attachment 2) showing the information which should be included in your proposals. For further details on the program, please call Ed Thornhill , Hater Conservation Manager , at (213 ) 250-6566 , or Wiley Horne , Director of Planning, at (213 ) /250-6217 . ar Boronkay EJT/gg Attachments cc : All Directors TABLE 1 STANDARD WATER CONSERVATION MEASURES AND ASSIGNED SAVINGS Water Savings Gallons-Day Measure Per Capita Per Household Low-Flow Showerhead 7 .2 21. 6 Retrofit , 2. 75 gpm @ 80 psi Ultra Low-Flow Showerhead, 10. 5 31. 5 1. 5 gpm or less @ 80 psi Low-Flush Toilet Retrofit , 8 . 0 24 . 0 3 . 5 gallon per flush Ultra Low-Flush Toilet , 16 . 0 48 . 0 1 . 5 gallons per flush Low-Cost Retrofit Kit , installed by agency 6 . 5 19 . 5 Mass mailed 1 . 7 5 . 1 Higher-Cost Retrofit , Installed by agency 11 .2 33 . 6 Door Hang/Follow up 6 . 0 24 . 0 TABLE 2 TYPICAL EXAMPLES OF METROPOLITAN' S CONSERVATION CREDITS (per 10,000 installations) Term of Estimated Program Conservation Measure Agreement Water Savings Cost Credit *** Ultra-Low- 30 yrs. 16 Sped, or $5,000,000 $403,500 Flush Toilet 48 gpd/hh, or (1.5 gal) 17.520 gal/yr/hh, or 538 AFY x 10 yrs . 5,380 AF Ultra-Low-Flow 5 yrs. 10.5 gpcd, or $ 130,000 $ 65,000 showerhead, 31.5 gpd/hh, or 1.1 gpm model 11,498 gal/yr/hh, or 353 AFY x 5 yrs = 1.765 AF Retrofit 5 yrs . 11.2 gpcd, or $ 150.000 $ 75,000 hardware 33 .6 gpd/hh, or package' 12 ,264 gal/yr/hh, or 376 AFY x 5 yrs = 1,880 AF Retrofit 2 yrs. 6 .5 gpcd, or $ 10,000 $ 5,000 kit-- 19.5 gpd/hh, or 7 ,118 gal/yr/hh or 218 AFY x 2 yrs = 436 AF * Contains two 2-gpm showerheads, 2 toilet dam inserts, leak detection tablets; savings based on installation by agency. ** Contains toilet bag insert, showerhead flow restrictor, dye tablets; savings based on installation by agency. **x 575. 00/AF for each AF of estimated savings , or one-half of progra-. cost , whichever is less. Example 1 : The Standard Program Program and Cost A member agency, City •A" , proposes to install 10,000 retrofit plumbing kits in an area served by Metropolitan. Each kit contains two showerheads (chrome on brass) , two toilet dams (steel ) , dye tables to check for toilet leaks, and water conservation brochures . The hardware package costs $7 .50: house-by-house distribution costs an additional $7 . 50 per package. The installed cost is $IS per package, or $150 , 000 total . Water Savings Each installed package is estimated to save 11.2 gallons per capita per day; for an average household savings of 33 . 6 gallons per day, at 3 people per dwelling unit . These savings have been documented in several well-controlled studies during the last few years , as described in the AWWA Water Conservation Guidebook. City A documents 10. 000 installations, which would save 336 , 000 gallons per day , or 376 acre-feet per year (AF/yr ) . City A also documents that the total water savings is from water furnished by Metropolitan, and not from local sources . Value to Metropolitan Metropolitan would pay one-half the project cost , or $75 . 000 . if the water savings to Metropolitan justify the expenditure. Each installation is considered secure for at least five years . Therefore, the minimum savings are 5 yr X 376 AF/yr - 1, 880 AF . At the minimum avoided energy cost of $75/AF, the value of savings would be $75/AF X 1. 880 AF = $141. 000 . This value of savings justifies Metropolitan paying one-half the project cost , or $75 , 000, with City A paying the other half . Since the savings and cost for this type of measure are well documented , other than proof of installation, no additional review Would be necessary. In this case, because the savings are considered firm, and most of City Ass cost would be in the first year , the full conservation credit of $75.000 Would be deducted from the water bill after year one. -2- `..� Example 2 : A Special Case Program Definition and Cost Municipal Water District •B, " a member agency, proposes a leak detection and repair program covering its entire service area . There are 100.000 miles of water mains to be checked and repaired as necessary. The program would involve purchasing a specially equipped van for $60.000, providing a trained staff of two technicians whose salaries and benefits total $200. 000 each year, and retaining consulting/training services in the amount of $50.000 to get the program started . Allowing a life cycle of ten years for the program, and charging vehicle operating and maintenance costs at £0. 50 per mile and assuming 10. 000 miles per year . the start-up cost of the leak detection program would be approximately $310. 000, making no allowance for the cost of repairing the leaks . Start-Up Costs Crew salaries , benefits $200, 000 Consultant/training 50,000 Specially equipped van 60 , 000 $310 , 000 Annual costs thereafter would be on the order of $255 , 000 per year for crew costs and vehicle operation and maintenance , and actual repair of leaks . Annual Costs Crew salaries , benefits £200, 000/yr Vehicle 06M 5, 000/yr Actual repair of leaks 50. 000/yr £255 , 000/yr Water Savincs Based on previous experience , water main leak detection ma}' save on the order of 1 to 3 percent of total -3- annual deliveries through a large system. Assuming total retail sales in Member B ' s area of 200,000 AF/yr , a possible estimate of savings might be 2 .000 to 6.000 AF/yr , once the entire system is surveyed and repairs made. At the minimum avoided energy cost of 675/AF, and assuming that 00 percent of the total savings would be from water supplied by Metropolitan, we would expect that Metropolitan' s avoided costs would eventually amount to $120. 000 per year , or more (2.000 AF/yr x f75/AF E SO%) . Cost sharing Metropolitan would agree to pay one-half the start up cost of $310, 000, or E155. 00D, in view of the high probability of out savings exceeding that amount . Based on water audit data, Member B believes that the program will save at least 1 percent of total deliveries (2,00D AF/yr ) after three years and 2 percent of total deliveries (4 . 000 AF/yr ) after six years . This would avoid $460. 000 per year in rate payments to Metropolitan after three years , and $920,000 per year after six years , at our treated water rate of $230/AF . Member B pays the annual costs of $255 , 000, and , even considering overhead costs , expects to have positive cash flow by year three and full cost recovery by year five or six . 8-1 �..i METROPOI/TAN WATfR 0/STR/C7 OF SO(/THERN G7[/fORN/A August S. 1988 (Water Problems Committee--Action) k Board of Directors (Finance and Insurance Committee--Information ; rMffl. General Manager Aderr. Financial Incentives for Water Conservation Summary Metropolitan ' s Board has established a firm policy of supporting water conservation. It is estimated that Metropolitans service area is currently saving 200, 000 acre- feet per year (AFY) of water through conservation, and our facility planning includes a long-term goal of saving 450. 000 AFY by 2010 . To help reach this goal and to assist the drought effort , this letter proposes a "Conservation Credits', incentive program similar to the incentives contained in Metropolitan' s Local Projects Program. The program would be implemented in coordination with the member agencies , reviewed from time to time as experience is gained , and reports made to your Board on its effectiveness . In brief , Metropolitan would pay up to one-half of the direct cost of a new water conservation project , provided Metropolitan ' s contribution is justified by the value of the water savings to Metropolitan and by the local need for our participation. The value to Metropolitan of the water saved would be based on our avoided energy cost , as in the Local Projects Program. Each project agreement over $75 , 000 would be submitted to your Board for approval and funding . The program includes flexibility for assisting new and emerging technology, demonstration projects , and other projects where special circumstances , opportunities , and benefits apply. California Environmental Quality Act requirements will be complied with before entering into any agreement. Recommendation 1 . That the Board of Directors approve, in concept , the water conservation credits program set forth in this letter . Board of Directors -2- August s , 19as 2 . That the General Manager be authorized to request proposals from the member agencies for water conservation projects which would be considered for participation on an individual basis, substantially as set forth in this letter . Funding for each qualifying project over $75,000 will be requested upon project approval by the Board. Detailed Report Backaround Your Board, .through its Administrative Code and the Regional Urban Water Management Plan, has established firm policies supporting water conservation. Financial incentives are an effective means of carrying out these policies . In July 1985 , your Board adopted a Water Management Plan which identified several water conservation measures to be evaluated and implemented . These measures included plumbing retrofit , California Irrigation Management Information System (CIMIS ) , Reriscape, leak detection, industrial , and promotional programs . Financial incentives were identified as a measure to be evaluated. In August 1987, your Board placed its formal policy on water conservation in the Administration Code . The policy states : " It shall be the policy of the District to undertake and support water conservation programs . To that end, the District may develop and implement such programs and enter into agreements with member public agencies and other organizations to make more efficient use of water resources through water conservation programs no long as such agreements serve a beneficial purpose of the District. " (Administrative Code, Section 4209) Metropolitan' s Water Conservation Goals Southern California has a tradition of water conservation . Our region is now saving an estimated 200 , 000 acre-feet of water each year through water conservation measures , and our facility planning includes a long-term goal of saving 450 , 000 AFY by 2010. `.✓ The proposed program for assisting water conservation is analogous to our Local Projects Program. �.d Board of Directors -3- August 8, 1988 which provides financial incentives for water reuse and other local projects. Although serving no retail customers , Metropolitan can act in conjunction with the member agencies to offer financial incentives to retail agencies to implement conservation measures which release Metropolitan water for other uses. Proposed incentive Program Water conservation has both local and regional benefits . The local benefits include reduced sever loadings , reduced use of electricity and natural gas for heating water , and reduced water distribution costs . Regional water supply benefits include reduced cost of aqueduct pumping and potential savings in treatment and distribution costs . In many cases , however , the local benefits of conservation are not sufficient to offset total project costs , which would include direct program costs such as new staffing and hardware , as well as administrative overhead , loss of rate revenue by retail water purveyors, and other factors . In such cases , a sharing of costs between local entities and Metropolitan is proposed . Under the proposed program, Metropolitan would pay up to one-half of the direct costs of new water conservation measures that reduce demands on Metropolitan, provided that Metropolitan ' s contribution is justified by the value of the water saved and by the local need for Metropolitan' s assistance . As with the Local Projects Program, the value of the water saved would be based on Metropolitan ' s avoided cost of pumping State project water , and the conservation credit would be deducted from the participating member agencies ' water bill . The avoided cost of pumping would be the Department of Water Resources ' (DWR) average sale price for surplus energy on the State project , multiplied by a net lift of 3 .000 kWh/AF through the East Branch Aqueduct, and subject to a minimum or floor value of $75/AF, like the Local Projects Program. Whether a project needs Metropolitan ' s assistance to be financially feasible would depend on total project cost , loss of retail rate revenue, local benefits, and possibly other factors . Projects undertaken essentially for _ purposes other than to conserve water would normally not be funded . For measures with known technology and savings , the proposed program would utilize a standard review and Board of Directors -4- August 8 , 1986 qualification process . A more detailed review process will be needed for new and emerging technology, or for measures whose savings depend on local circumstances . Each project agreement would be negotiated on an individual basis , and those agreements over $75.000 would be submitted to the Board for approval and funding. Table 1 is a representative listing of measures whose savings are well documented, while Table 2 shows examples of how the conservation credits would be calculated under the standard process. The standard process will facilitate the implementation of most measures , provide for prompt action during droughts, and ensure equal treatment of all member agencies . Special case projects would include such measures as leak detection and repair , CIMIS , Xeriscape or "Water Wise', landscaping, industrial process recycling, and others . The program will be reviewed from time to time as experience is gained , and reports made to your Board on its effectiveness . Examples of a standard program and a "Special Case" are attached . Need for Flexibility A particular project may have special benefits for Metropolitan other than the energy savings . Such benefits could include technology development, important research results , protection of a vital resource, or permanent loss of an opportunity if the project is not implemented . In recommending approval and funding of specific projects , the General Manager would consider such benefits . Estimated Program Cost The cost of the conservation credit program will depend on the number of projects qualifying for Metropolitans assistance each year . As a preliminary estimate, it is assumed that 20 projects may qualify in the first year . Using typical costs which are representative of a variety of projects , the first year ' s outlay by Metropolitan might be on the order of $1. 500, 000. Using reasonable estimates , these 20 projects would save about 10, 000 acre-feet of water each year over a minimum period of five years . The unit cost to Metropolitan would be about $35 to $40 per acre-foot of water saved . As experience is gained , we will update your Board on project costs , savings , and overall effectiveness . Board of Directors -5- August 8 , 1966 Terms and Conditions for Agreements The participants in a conservation credits agreement would be Metropolitan, the appropriate member agency, and a local sponsor (s ) , if different from the member . In order to qualify for the conservation credits program, a water conservation project must be a new project which reduces demands on Metropolitan, and it must have demonstrable water savings. The project must also be technically sound and have local support by water agencies and municipalities . Finally. Metropolitan's participation rust be necessary to make the program financially and economically feasible . Where practical and appropriate, efforts will be made to obtain participation from benefiting wastewater agencies or other beneficiaries . California Environmental Quality Act requirements wfll be complied with before entering into any agreement . r , � a�y FWE/wit At to chuer.ts ATTACHMENT 2 EXHIBIT A OUTLINE OF PROPOSED WATER CONSERVATION PROJECT I. Design of Conservation Measure A. Measure description 1. Target audience (customer class) 2 . Implementation method a. Publicity, marketing plan, promotion b. Give-aways c. Rebates d. Distribution 3 . Implementation schedule a. Start up b. Duration C . Comnletion d. Time of year , week , day B. Labor and material requirements 1 . Agency staff a . Time requirements b. Responsibilities 2 . Contractor(s ) a. Time requirements b . Responsibilities c. Experience 3 . Device ( s ) selected a. Manufacturer b. Number of devices needed C. Turnaround to get devices from manufacturer d. Cost per device e. Storage of device �.r A-2 4 . Artwork for marketing plan a. Required artwork b. Artwork performed by c. Reproduction turnaround time d. Number of copies 5. Training requirements a. Training participants b. Training materials c. Training date d. Training site e. Cost of training II . Marketing Plan A. Preimplementation publicity plan 1. Media 2. Artwork 3. Press releases 4 . Notice to participants B. During implementation plan 1. Media 2 . Communication with participants III : Measure Implementation A. Competitive bidding procedures for devices, contract labor B. Kick-off meeting/selection of control and test sites C. Tracking and reporting during implementation 1 . Tracking of acceptance/installation rate 2. Implementation adjustment if installation/acceptance rates low D. Progress reports 1. Fifty percent progress report 2 . Final report A-3 IV. Water Savings Analysis Procedure A. Overall methodology used to determine savings 1. Means of determining short-term acceptance/installa- tion/compliance rate 2. Means of determining long-term acceptance/installa- tion/compliance rate 3. Means of determining water savings B. Staff or consultant performing water savings analysis C. Background/qualifications of person doing analysis D. Selection of test site 1 . Required sample size E. Selection of control group 1 . Required sample size F. Determining installation/acceptance/compliance rate a . Phone, drive-by, mail survey procedure b. Estimate of long-term installation/acceptance/ compliance rate G. Water Savings a . For participating customers b . Statistical significance test V. Cost Estimate A. Short-term costs 1 . Labor a . Staff b. Contracted 2 . Supplies 3 . Equipment 4 . Other direct costs A-4 B. Long-term costs 1. Labor a. Staff b. Contracted 2. Supplies 3. Equipment 4. Other direct costs C. Value of water saving to Metropolitan D. Total amount requested APPENDIX B DRAFT WATER CONSERVATION PLAN COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 1 B 4 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714)962-2411 DRAFT WATER CONSERVATION PLAN March 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Introduction B. Current Area Water Conservation Programs C. Initiatives in Industrial Commercial and Institutional Water Conservation D. Initiatives in Residential Water Conservation E. Initiatives in Water Reclamation F. Summary \/ A. Introduction The Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Sanitation Districts) have recently approved a comprehensive Master Plan, Environmental Impact Report and an application for renewal of our 301(h) Ocean Discharge Permit. These three major documents combine to form what we have entitled, "2020 VISION", our 30-Year Action Plan for Wastewater and Balanced Environmental Management. As part of "2020 VISION" , the Boards have approved, in concept, programs that will emphasize the beneficial reuse of sludge, the construction and operation of additional water reclamation plants and the expansion and upgrading of the Sanitation Districts' involvement in water conservation programs. The Sanitation Districts' primary business is not the delivery of potable water, thus our water conservation efforts in the past have been limited. To date, the Sanitation Districts' efforts have focused on measures enforced on our industrial dischargers through the industrial waste ordinance. An expanded water conservation program will include a comprehensive system of measures crafted for the Sanitation Districts and will reinforce the efforts of other regional water agencies. Moreover, active water reclamation in Orange County will continue and expand as a part of cost-effective water resource management. A large number and variety of agencies interact to achieve potable water supply and water reuse in Orange County. Exhibit 1 shows the numerous agencies involved, starting with imported water via the state water project or the Colorado River aqueduct, through the Municipal Water Districts (MWD) , Metropolitan Water Districts of Orange County (MWDOC) , Coastal Municipal Water District (CMWD), Orange County Water District (OCWD) , local cities or retailers and finally to consumers. Exhibit 2 gives the location of retail water agencies in the county. Exhibit 3 lists the key agencies with water management responsibilities and their major programs affecting Orange County. Those agencies which most directly affect the Sanitation Districts include: State Department of Water Resources (DWR) , State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) , Department of Health Services (DOHS) and California Regional Water Quality Control Boards (CRWQCB) . B. Current Sanitation Districts and Area Water Conservation Programs Current Orange County water conservation programs, summarized in Exhibit 4, show a focus on MWD, CMWD, MWDOC and OCWD. Their conservation programs emphasize public education, system management and urban landscape programs. Up to this point in time, the Sanitation Districts implemented water conservation program has focused on industrial, commercial and institutional facilities. In addition to industrial water conservation, the Sanitation Districts have developed an active conservation education program. Although not a direct means of flow reduction, education is an essential step toward implementation of direct conservation measures. If consumers are to be -1- EXHIBIT 1 AGENCY INTERRELATIONSHIPS IMPORTED WATER LOCAL WATER SANTA ANA COLORADO NO. CALIFORNIA RIVER RIVER STATE WATER GROUND AQUEDUCT PROJECT WATER BASIN CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT< COUNTY OF WATER RESOURC S SANITATION (DWR) DISTRICTS OF OUNTY COUNTY (CSDOC) METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SO. CALIFORNIA(MWD) --- -------- --------- --I WATER ADVISORY COMMITTEE OF ORANGE COUNTY (WACO) MUNICIPAL COASTAL WATER ORANGE MUNICIPAL L WATER DISTRICT DISTRICT OF ORANGE DISTRICT o (CWMD) (MWDOC) (OCWD) r w W � 2 a I a 2 LL a Q 2 a N n RETAILING AGENCIES `/ CONSUMERS EXI non z _ LOCATION OF RETAIL WATER AGENCIES CONTRACTING AGENCY BOUNDARIES IONM LINDA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT CITY OF ORE SOW.C. SANTIAGO COUNTY CITY OF WATER DISTRICT LA IYBRA SANTA ANA MOUNTAINS COUNTY WATER CITY OF FULLERTON SERRANO DISTRICT IPPI6 AT ON DISTRICT EAST CITY OF ORANGE ORANGE COUNTY WATCH CITY OF ANATEIM 019 TRICT LOS CITY OF IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT ALIIS 1OS EP 'UENA PARK DISTRICT SANTA MARGARITA WATER DISTRICT CITY OF EL GARDEN GROVE TORO CITY OF SANTA ANA WATER DISTRICT SOUTHERN CPL IfONHIA wI ER NOULTON NIBUEL COMIR• NY CITY OF WATER DISTRICT WE57Y1N9fER LI TY OFSANTA 1 HEIGHTS OUN WATER CO.IRIN MPtER CO CAV]i MMO TALL EY VALLEY WAFER CITY OF MESA LILY OF DISTRICT CONSOLIDATED TRY CITIES SfA1 SEA NEWPORT WATER CH tlEAtll MUNICMUNICIPAL DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT CITY OF NUN TINOTON BEACH 19 v LAOUNA BEACH COUNTY ` WATER DISTRICT SOUTH COAST COUNTY WATER DISTRICT ® NOT INCLUDED IN JURISDICTION OF A RETAIL WATER AGENCY EXHIBIT 3 KEY AGENCIES WITH WATER MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES AFFECTING ORANGE COUNTY Aeenw Level Role Responsibilities Mawr Proemens Other Commcros US. Bureau of Reclamation(USBR) l3ederal Planning,designing,and operating weer supply Operates Califomu'a Central Valley Project; projee.in the Western States. apµ)nums water fran the Colorado Riser. Depanment of Water Resources(DW R) State protecting and conserving Cdifomu's water Planning,construction.and operation of state rescnoirs.planning to meet Celifomia's water needs water projects;Rood control operations;rarely from all available sources,and providing for public of dams;and data collection and evaluation .rely in relation to water resources. (desalination,mclamation,son melon). State Water Resources Contra!Bomar State Selling statewide policies on ester pollution control, Clean Water Grant Program and Water Rights Assists Regional Water Quality Control (SWRCB) administering water rights,and providing technical Administration. Bond,Santa Ana Region. and legal assistanm to nine regional aaalcr quality control boanL. Department of Health Services(DO11S) State Regulating controls for public wmler supplies and Implememation of Safe Drinking Water An Works clocly with Orange County licalth mewl M harardous wastes. and llaraWom Materials Management Department to implement programs. activities. 1T Melmppoolion Water Dial of Regional Distributes ram sells a Mend ed Colorado River and The system includes 8 reservoirs,VS miles of Orange Countys source of importedwaler, Southern Gbiennia(MWD) state perfect waters to 29 member agencies in pipelines,5 filtration plants nM 12 power Soathcm California for domestic,municipal, plants. Provides wmer to 13 million people. agricultural and groundwater replenishment purpmes Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Regional Dev doping a water yy ality mnlml plan for the Santa Preparing a basin plan eslablishing salinity fond Powers AgR my composed of O.,7, (SAWPA) Ana R r Wecrshed� objectives m prortct me Sane Ana River for County Water District,Came Basin MWD, gmumhvdcr replrnishmcm;constructing San Bernardino Valley MWD,Wesmm Malewaler pipelines MWD,and Fastern MWD. Regional Water Quality Control Board Regional One of nine regional boards responsible for direct Adopting water quality standards for ground Regional Board standards am designed to San,.Ana Region(RWQCB) regulatory control of caste discharge.Operates and surface waters within the Santa Ana River pprotect Uppper anJ lower San,.Ana autonomously with SW RCB. Bain; issuing wane discharge .its ro Wat<rsh<Es for el beneficial taus Salinity industrial and municipal dischargers. standards measured at Prado Dam ensure against degradation of Orange County gmunJwamr quality by upstream discharge. Coastal Municipal Water Districts County Bring metropolitan water to coastal Orange County, Wholesaling water to six-mcmbcr agencies for Frst municipal water d'ntrict to become a (Coastal) ingM1 southerly Diego line. ��and Corm d6aninamm to 125,M people. member of MWD(1941). Mess Municipal Water District of Orange County Provide wholesale imported water for much of Wholesaling water to 32-member agencies for Originally established as Oran County County(MWDOC) Orange County for domestic,municipal,agricultural distribution to 13 million People and operating Municipal Water District (195 );became and groundwater replenishment uses. the Allen-McCulloch Pipeline. MWDOC in 1%9. Orange County Water District(OCWD) County Manage Orange County',primary groundwater Capturing aM percolating Saner Ana River District boundaries medic approximately_ supply and yrote<t the mum/s nghts to water in the Bow; purchasing Import water for ao%of the County.31 rcpamle agencies m Santa Ana River. groundwater recharge in the river and Orange County or(nrcam reservoir spreading; treating CSDOC secondary effluent for groundwater mchaW, irrigation and other uses. County Sanitarioa Districts of Orange County Treat and manage much of Orange Cmety s amgc Cdkcting and treating mwage from IA million County(CSDOC) for ocean discharge and muse,in Orange County. ppee pple and providing high quality effluent to OCWD;developing upstream oancr reclamation treatment ylam wa s for groundter rechaW.irrigation arM other reuses. Various Ctim.Water Districts,and Intl Serve water to individual customers. private Water Companies EXHIBIT 4 WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAMS IN ORANGE COUNTY Systems Management (Metering, Pricing, Interior Residential Leak Detection, Use (retrofit and Urban Landscape Level of Government Public Education System Rehabilitillion) New Construction) Industrial Use IrriLalion Slate-Deparlmenl of • Distribution of water •Water audit and leak Water Conservation Industrial portion of • Preparation of Water Resources, conservation detection programs Kit distribution Urban Water technical information Office of Water materials •Urban Water Rate Conservation on landscape water Conservation • Centralized clearing Making manual Program management house for water • Co-sponsorship of conservation Xcriscape Seminars information in California Regional-The • Conservation •Water audits Retrofit device • Co-sponsorship of Metropolitan Water literature •Leak detection distribution Xeriscape Seminars Districts of Southern • Water Watch •Meter calibration California and replacement • C=In-school program •Corrosion control • Conservation •Valve exercising seminars •Metering existing • Displays/exhibits customers • Literature and bill •Meter loan payment sluffers to member •Water pricing agencies analyses County-Coastal, • 4-Slage school •Retail water agency Co-sponsorship of bIWDOC, and OCWD program (MWDOC) conservation/ Xeriscape Seminars reaching 80,000 information (MWDOC) students/yr. programs (Coastal including Ricki the and MWDOC) Rambunctious Raindrop and Twelfth p i ht Repertory Company. • Information distribution (Coastal, MWDOC, and OCWD) • Tours of facilities (MWDOC and OCWD) IRWD Pilot project Water Conservation Kits distribution CSDOC Industrial Waste Minimization I'rogrun S,wrtc: WAfY), 1'aW R GtiIIf1C Sniff. receptive to the costs or inconvenience of water saving, they must be N../ informed of the benefits and be convinced of the need to save water. They also must be supplied with "how to' information. Views about the immediate availability of water and user habits are deeply entrenched in the average consumer. Education is needed to ensure that the public is well informed regarding California's water resources and the need for water conservation. A well-planned educational program creates a "water conscience" in the consuming public. Conservation education at the Sanitation Districts is a long-range and repetitive program intended to promote a conservation ethic. The first objective is to convince city and county officials and managers and directors of water agencies and utilities of the usefulness of such a program. Advertising plays an important part in a water conservation/flow reduction program. Many people can be reached by newspapers, magazines, radio, and television. Information is disseminated through written materials, such as bill stuffers and pamphlets, and through buttons, bumper stickers and posters. A speaker's bureau has been an effective way to spread the message to the community at meetings, conferences, seminars, and workshops. Materials for community presentations have been prepared and employees trained for most effective results. In-school conservation education is an integral part of any long-range community conservation effort. Instructional materials have been prepared on the subject by several California water agencies and DWR. In addition, several California water agencies, DWR and the American Water Works Association, offer general adult-level public education information, such as information on low water-using landscapes and advice on the use of water-saving devices in the home. Films are also used at meetings and on plant tours. Every children's group that tours the Sanitation Districts' treatment facilities is shown a 13-minute film presentation on ways water is wasted in the home. The film presentation is followed by a discussion on the importance of water conservation and its relationship to the Sanitation Districts' function. Also, the Sanitation Districts is currently involved in a kindergarten through 6th grade public education consortium that is developing materials on environmental quality awareness. Plans for the program include a discussion of the importance of water conservation and the role conservation efforts play in overall environmental awareness. The program also stresses the concept of personal responsibility toward environmental impacts. All public presentation slide shows by the Sanitation Districts' staff include a discussion of water conservation. Slides have been specially -2- designed to communicate the ways in which water use can be reduced in the home. C. Initiatives in Industrial. Commercial and Institutional Conservation The Introduction and Summary of the Sanitation Districts' 1989 revised "Wastewater Discharge Regulations" states that two of the primary goals of the Ordinance are: • To require the reduction of water discharged to the sewer system. • To require waste minimization and material substitution for industrial users. The Sanitation Districts have, since the late 1970's, encouraged water conservation as a means to reduce the size of its pollution control facilities and reduce the cost of operation both in water purchased and wastewater discharged. The Sanitation Districts' industrial waste inspectors are field oriented and have provided technical assistance to a variety of dischargers on manufacturing process changes that may reduce the wastewater discharge without suffering a loss in product quality. Suggestions on better rinsing techniques and reuse or recycle of water to a less critical use are in the technical repertoire of the inspectors and the Sanitation Districts' engineers. The inspectors also enforce the prohibition against single pass cooling water requiring recycle to a cooling tower or air cooler, a chilled water system, or reuse of the water in another piece of equipment in the manufacturing process. The Sanitation Districts' waste discharge permit system prevents dilution and wasting water from being used to meet discharge limits. The permit limit is based on mass emission rates, the average wastewater flow and concentration of the pollutant. When a discharger is sampled on a particular day to determine if they are in compliance with the permit limits, they cannot just turn up the rinsewater to dilute the concentrations. Future plans to encourage and require water conservation among the Sanitation Districts' industrial, commercial and institution dischargers will be done as part of the Sanitation Districts' waste minimization program. A multi-agency task force of the Orange County Health Care Agency Waste Management Section, the South Coast Air Quality Management Agency, and the Sanitation Districts have been assembled to provide a multi-media land, air and water approach to waste minimization. The Sanitation Districts implemented in January 1990, permit requirements for a waste minimization plan and enforcement requirements for waste minimization audits for chronic non-compliant dischargers. The planned emphasis of the Sanitation Districts will first focus on industrial water conservation techniques to reduce the wastewater flow. Industries will either implement waste minimization and water _3_ conservation techniques or be required to submit a report explaining why they cannot achieve these goals. Eventually, as more firms show that water conservation is practical, the Sanitation Districts hope to base future waste discharge permit limits on the expected flow with water conservation rather than permit limits based on present discharges. After completion of this step with the more than 500 first priority industries, the Sanitation Districts will turn its focus toward commercial and institutional dischargers. These are a much larger number of discharging entities typified as having significantly lower wastewater flows per employee or per square foot of floor space. D. Initiatives in Residential Water Conservation The Sanitation Districts' newly adopted water conservation policy states: • Actively foster and promote water conservation; • Develop cooperative programs with other public agencies to provide public education, community use of water-saving devices, amend plumbing codes, and other appropriate changes to help reduce water usage. To achieve the Sanitation Districts' water conservation goals, eight major steps will be taken in 1990. These steps include accurate definition of the Sanitation Districts' facilities, evaluation of conservation alternatives, evaluation of political and institutional factors affecting conservation implementation, survey of existing conservation programs as examples, research and demonstration of conservation devices and development of information and education programs. This will produce a comprehensive and detailed conservation plan and policy for consideration and implementation by the Boards. After implementation, routine monitoring will provide the Sanitation Districts with an understanding of the results being achieved. This monitoring will provide an ongoing assessment of flow increases to be used in determining timing of construction for trunk and treatment plant expansions. As a means of evaluating conservation alternatives, staff has created a preliminary matrix in Exhibit 5. During the plan development we will look at every type of conservation and rate it according to a variety of factors. This preliminary matrix shows some of the factors to be used including impact on Sanitation Districts' facilities. This is important to help prioritize amongst the many alternatives. For example, in residential conservation, landscape conservation is likely to have very little effect on Sanitation Districts' facilities, whereas toilet retrofit devices could be very significant. Exhibit 6 shows a representative list of water conservation measures to be further evaluated in this phase of the work. -4- EXHIBIT 5 CONSERVATION ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS EVALUATION MATRIX Quantity Impact on Community Type of Conservation Cost Saved f/ al CSDOC Facilities Reliability Performance Acceptance A. Municipal 1. Fire righting 2. Plumbing code revisions B. Residential 1. Pricing 2. Retrofit devices-toilets a. Mini-Flush C. Agricultural 1. Line canals D. Industrial 1. Process Minimintion E.Tourist 1. Educational Programs F. Education 1. Youth curriculums EXHIBIT 6 ALTERNATIVE WATER CONSERVATION MEASURES Municipal Conservation Residential Conscrvadon General Application Fight foes with less water Public education Implement equitable water rates that also Metering achieve conservation Pricing: Implement efficient metering practices Uniform rate blocks Utilize on-site wastewater treatment recycling system Increasing rate blocks Keep city parks green on less water using low-flow Penally charges irrigation systems and low-water demand plants Demapd charges Plan and finance system rehabilitation, retrofit and leak Leak detection control System rehabilitation Reduce water pressure while maintaining good service Keep city streets clean with less water Imeticir Residential Use Size water distribution systems with demand reductions Size wastewater collection, treatment and distribution Retrofit devices: systems with demand reductions Displacement bottles Implement codes for increasing water efficiency; e.g.; Shower flow restrictors plumbing futures, swimming pools, water waste, etc Toilet dams Efficiently irrigate large landscapes; e.g., golf courses, Low-flow shower heads parks, cemeteries, and schools Pipe insulation Design water-efficient landscapes; e.g., Xcrisrape Pressure regulators Maintain water-efficient landscapes Faucet aerators Install water-efficient landscapes Water-efficient appliances Distribution system leak detection program Devices for new construction: Develop low water-using landscape ordinances for new and Low-flush toilets existing developments Pressure regulators Landscape water audit Air-assisted showers Distribution system water audit Faucet aerators Provide incentives to developers for incorporating water Wmertffncicw appliances conservation Sources of water-elrcient landscape plant materials Urban Landscape Irrigation Employee education programs Reduced watering Low water-msc planting Sprinkler systems Scheduled irrigation Moisture-sinning controllers Dual water systems Turf reduction Water cops EXHIBIT 6 (Cons.) ALTERNATIVE WATER CONSERVATION MEASURES Agricultural Conservation Industrial Conservation Use reclaimed water for irrigation Reduce industrial process and waste return flows Increase crop yields while reducing water use Reuse water or use reclaimed water for industrial Determine when it is not profitable to continue applications; eg, cooling water, breweries, irrigating elec roaia, paper processing, food processing, Implement equitable agriculture water rates that metal plating foundries, and aircraft conserve water Use reclaimed water for commercial uses; e.g., Do agriculture irrigation evaluations laundries, car washing, cooling, air conditioning, Develop efficient agriculture irrigation schedules hospitals, and zoos Reduce water use by reducing fertilizer and Industrial water audit pesticide use while maintaining or increasing Use low-flow irrigation systems and low-water yield through sludge compost use as a soil demand plants for industrial landscaping amendment Employee education programs Maximize agriculture management profits by Use high tech irrigation timing better managing existing irrigation systems; e.g., Sanitary systems retrofit furrow, border, sprinkler, drip, linear move, Construction site water control center pivot Line canals without emptying them Use low energy precision application of water of crops Proper crop management to protect and conserve Conservation Education water Role of new crop hybrids that need less water Develop youth education curriculum and Feld setup using laser leveling to maximize water programs use Sell conservation programs Tail water recovery and use Develop and implement local conservation plan Develop education programs at zoos, museums, parks and water treatment facilities Tourist Conservation Produce a water conservation conference Joint programs with MWDOC and other area Develop education programs at recreation agencies facilities, resorts, hotels, motels, and restaurants local community awareness campaigns Install Xeriscapes Media managemeat for news, educational Employee education programs opportunities and public service advertisements Point-of-sale education To accomplish these objectives, the Sanitation Districts have added a new full-time professional staff member responsible for the Sanitation Districts' water conservation programs. The key responsibilities of this person include: • Monitor current Sanitation Districts' conservation programs; • Coordinate with City, County and State agencies; • Research, evaluate and recommend water conservation means and devices; • Develop public education programs for schools, industry, groups and others; • Create a comprehensive Conservation Plan evaluating alternatives, public acceptance and institutional factors affecting Sanitation Districts' programs; • Aggressively implement adopted Plan; and • Monitor and coordinate with federal, state and regional regulators responsible for water conservation. E. Initiatives in Water Reclamation Reclamation of wastewater for reuse in lieu of potable water has been studied and practiced for over 50 years in California. During that time, there have been more than 350 safe and reliable water reuse projects with no known detrimental health effects. Water reclamation in Orange County, including south County activities, presently equals about 23.6 million gallons-per-day (mgd) , which is more than 8.6 billion gallons-per-year. Of this total, the Sanitation Districts are responsible for 32 percent through on-site irrigation at the two plants and groundwater recharge of treated secondary effluent accomplished by the Orange County Water District. In about 18 months, the first phase of the Green Acres project will be complete which will add up to 6.25 mgd of reused water. With implementation of this project, the Sanitation Districts' contribution to reclamation in Orange County will rise to 43 percent. From previous planning studies, the wastewater reclamation potential in Orange County was estimated to equal about 150,000 acre-feet per year which equals 135 mgd. This information is summarized in Exhibit 7. "2020 VISION" established long-term planning goals for water reclamation which include: • construct and operate three new upstream water reclamation plants; • continue providing secondary effluent for reclamation; • continue cooperation with other water agencies; and, • develop new reuse markets to maximize reclamation. -5- EXHIBIT 7 PRESENT AND POTENTIAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION WITHIN ORANGE COUNTY (AF/YEAR) Total Present Prcacnt Planned ProieCts' and Other Avenoy' use Phase I R Adilitional Planned Potential IRRIGATION IRWD' 10,370 4,430 0 6,780 21,580 34,000 LAWD 0 0 2,190 1,125 3,315 0 NINW'D/AWMA 500 850 0 2,080 3,430 4,470 SMWD 900 1,280 0 0 2,180 4,820 LHSD 750 0 0 0 750 0 SCCWD 50 860 0 0 910 0 SCWD/No. Irvine 0 0 0 0 0 600 OCWD' 0 3,5M 0 1,330 5,280 3,500 SC 3,600 0 0 0 3,600 0 CSDOC' 73. 0 0 0 2366 0 Subtotal 16,406 10,920 2,190 11,315 41,281 52,790 GROUNDWATER RECHARGE OCW'D: -Alamitos Barricr 0 0 0 5,400 5,400 0 -Anaheim Forebav 0 0 0 L,000 12,000 12,000 -Water Factory 21's I0.000 0 0 0 10.000 IS fM Subtotal 10,000 0 0 17,400 27,400 30,000 TOTAL 26,406 10,920 2,190 28,715 68,681 82,790 PRTED, /nine Ranch Water District; LAWD, Los Alisos Water District;MNWD, Moulton Niguel Water District AWMA,Aliso [(rater Management Agency;Sill' D, Santa Margarita Water District, LHSD, Lemon Heights Sanitary District;SCCIirD, South Coast County Water District,,SCWD, Santiago County Water District, OCWD, Orange County Water District;SC, Cin,of San Clemente; CSDOC County Sanitation Districts of Orange County ' Yield derived fronn MWD Local Projects Status Repon, September 1982 and Orange and Los Angeles Counties Water Reuse Study, Facilities Plan, April 1982. ' Updated per 19841RWD Gsigation/Reclamadon System Master Plan and to include the OCWD Green Acres Project. ' CSDOC contribution based on 12-month running average ending July 1989 equals 4300 AF/1EAR which is 83%of total 10,000 AF/YEAR for Present Use for groundwater recharge by OCWD at Water Factory 2L ' CSDOC total contribution through on-sire irrigation and groundwater recharge equals 32%of Total Present Use. Source:WACO, 1986 and CSDOC staff mxanh, 1989. The Action Plan included evaluations of alternative sites for potential r./ water reclamation plants. Exhibit 8 shows the location of 18 possibilities which were narrowed to three high-priority sites. The site selection criteria used in this process are shown in Exhibit 9. A weighting system was applied to these criteria and the result was the rankings shown in Exhibit 10. These projects were further evaluated for their cost-effectiveness compared to the price of water from MWD. Exhibit 11 shows that the top three projects would be cost-effective within the next 15 years. Exhibit 12 lists the retail water rates throughout Orange County as of 1985 for a comparison. In total, these three projects would amount to 43 mgd of additional water reclamation, an increase of 161 percent over existing water reclamation projects in Orange County. These projects are summarized as follows: • Crescent Basin - 25 mgd • Seal Beach - 13 mgd • Forebay - 5 mgd The majority of the water reclaimed by these three plants would be injected into the groundwater either for seawater intrusion barrier or to replenish groundwater drinking supplies. A summary of the potential water uses for these three plants is provided in Exhibit 13. The largest of the three potential water reclamation plants is Crescent Basin at 25 mgd. Its proposed location, shown in Exhibit 14, is adjacent to the Santa Ana Freeway, a short distance from Brookhurst Street and adjacent to Crescent Avenue. This is approximately a 10-acre site. Staff has recently been informed of the availability of a new potential water reclamation plant site owned by the Wastewater Disposal Company. The 5.74-acre parcel is located near the intersection of Orangethorpe and State College Boulevard in Fullerton. Staff is evaluating the feasibility of this site for a water reclamation plant and will compare it to the proposed Crescent Basin project. This preliminary comparison was completed in January 1990. Implementing water reclamation projects will require the Sanitation Districts to work through numerous federal, state, and regional regulatory agencies. A brief summary of these regulations is presented in Exhibit 15. The issuance of permits for a reclamation project is by the DOHS and CRWQCB who have had these responsibilities delegated to them. The Sanitation Districts' water reclamation projects may be severely constrained by recently proposed DOHS Title 22 regulation revisions. The state agency has suggested that reclaimed water for groundwater - injection should be blended with fresh water at a ratio of 20:80, -6- EXHIBIT 8 r _ _ ALTERNATIVE SITES FOR A POTENTIAL WATER RECLAMATION PLANT COUNTY SANITATION OISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY MASTER PLAN REPORT EXHIBIT 9 SITE SELECTION EVALUATION CRITERIA A Site Availability Weighting Factor = 3 B. Sufficient Wastewater Tributary to Diversion Point J C. Seismic Hazard D. Mitigation Requirements E. Ease of Interceptor Separation F. Influent Wastewater Quality j Weighting Factor = 2 G. Proximity to Water Reuse Areas H. Proximity to Area/Sensitive Environmental Constraints I. Site Area, Shape, Access Flexibility J. Implementation Requirements Weighting Factor = 1 K Proximity to Discharge Locations EXHIBIT 10 v SITE RANKINGS Alternative Site Evaluation Rank No. Location JCItv Points(a) 1 7 'Crescent Retarding Basin': Anaheim 149 Crescent Ave. and 1-5 2 13 Seal Beach Blvd. and Westminster Ave. Seal Beach 140 (US. Naval Weapons Station) 3 10 Tustin Ave. and la Palma Ave. Anaheim 130 4 6 Kellogg Dr. and La Palma Ave. Anaheim 128 5 8 Lincoln Avenue at Santa Ana River Unincorporated 125 6 9 SR 91 and AT&SF RR Anaheim 122 7 18 OC Steel Salvage - Anaheim 121 SR 91 at AT&SF RR 8 15 'Douglas Transfer Station' Anaheim 120 Douglas Rd. and Katella Ave. 9 11 'Anaheim Forcluty" Anaheim 107 at Santa Ana River 10 17 Santiago Hills, East Orange Unincorporated 105 11 14 Euclid St. and Chapman Ave. Garden Grove 105 12 16 Moulton Pkwy. and Jamboree Rd. Tustin 99 13 2 Beach Blvd. near Rosecrans Ave. Unincorporated 98 14 5 Kraemer Blvd. and Alta Vista St. Placentia 90 15 1 Puente St. and Lambert Rd. Brea 89 16 3 Dale St. and Malvern Ave. Buena Park 89 17 4 Associated Rd. and Bastanchury Rd. Fullerton 83 18 12 Santiago Creek gravel pits Unincorporated 71 (a) Maximum possible is 210 points. EXHIBIT 11 COST-EFFECITVENESS OF PRIORITY PROJECTS Potential Water 1989 Unit Cost Reclamation Plant 1989 Reclamation Adjusted Capital Facilities for MWD Site Cost Unit Cost Subsidy Facility 'Q �(SS.000) ($/acre-foot) (S/acre-foot) Crescent Basin WRP 7 129,830 490 - 75'= 415 Seal Beach WRP 13 56,630 515 • 75 - 440 Forebay WRP 10 31,200 335 - 75 - 260 'MWD subsidy _ PROJE= WATER RATES FOR MWD TREATED, NON-INTERRUPTIBLE SUPPLIES ]'sue Water Rate (S/acre-foot) 1988-89 230 1995 320 2000 425 2005 460 2010 480 2015 500 �.r EXHIBIT 12 1985 RETAIL WATER RATES IN ORANGE COUNTY Agency Water Rate (S/AF)' Garden Grove . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214 Huntington Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221 Westminster . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231 Yorba Linda County Water District . . . . . . . 234 Serrano Irrigation District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 240 Buena Park . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . 267 Santa Ana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272 Southern California Water Company. . . . . . . 302" Orange . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 304 Anaheim . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 307 Fountain Valley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310 Irvine Ranch Water District . . . . . . . . . . . . . 335 Moulton Niguel Water District . . . . . . . . . . . 334 Capistrano Beach County Water District . . . . 348 Fullerton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 355 Scal Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357 Brea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 362 La Habra . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 371 Tustin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 394 Newport Beach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 396 La Palma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 403 Santa Ana Heights Water Company . . . . . . . 408 Los Alisos Water District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 420 San Clemente . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 430 Orange Park Acres Mutual Water Company . 436 Laguna Beach County Water District . . . . . . 461 Capistrano Valley Water District . . . . . . . . . 470 Mesa Consolidated Water District . . . . . . . . 497 Santa Marguerila Water District . . . . . . . . . . 529 Lemon Heights Mutual Water Company . . . . 579 South Coast County Water District . . . . . . . . 598 Santa Ana Mountains County Water District . 589 Laguna Hills Water Company . . . . . . . . . . . . 606 Santiago County Water District . . . . . . . . . . 741 AVERAGE PRICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . 392 Bared upon a apical manrhty con fm/xWa gaBau -Dort nW indudc Cowan Neig/ Source: WACO. 1986. v EXHIBIT 13 .,�, SUMMARY OF RECLAIMED WATER MARKETS Crescent Basin WRP Average Annual Potential Use Demand (MG/YR) Kimberly Clark 866 Beatrice 238 Disoevland 219 Wrarher Corporadon/Disneyland Hotel 121 Knoll's Berry Farm 107 Hughes Aircraft 103 Local parks, golf courses, schools 510 Groundwater recharge 100 TOTAL 5,814 Seal Beach WRP Potential User Average Annual Demand (MG/YR) Alamitos Gap Barrier 2,190 THUMS Long Beach Oil Well Feld Injection, Long Beach 522 Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station 815 TOTAL 3,527 Forebay WRP Average Annual Potential User Demand (MG/YR) Birch Hills Golf Course Imperial Golf Course Tri-Ciries Park Craig Regional Park Cal State Fullerton Alta Vista Country Club Yorba Linda Country Club Yorba Linda Lakebed Carbon Canyon Regional Park TOTAL 1,825 v m 2bm AROFy1ST+ m 20n N N _ VELPRECY ST D ° 1`- O i n \ _HANOVER o HANOVER ST, ram- < PL 1000 U O - < m _�z� N a 1" '% ST a A c� G� HOME!PI- Z p 3 0 r x 1- z GAIN r ,- z gARCOURT m x LA rm z — r n Jp '� r m �� r HAMPTONm1 Si Z ;��', S00 Q 1 m in z m ITr,RON0 m Z m L I. �c� O HAMPTON ]) n L U Z a r- aL ' "1 ! - 1 O < ;. . m ,<. ST z HAMPTON r K ,- r ISTER_ qti� Z oBAKER , ST MONUMENT a Cl _a, to CAMRRIAST in < RAYIIOWIX J- _ F ; C n ALOr1A PL a ; ;mf m MODENA ST ST ROANNE < ST z < m p • n < < _ I^.n '= i Z BRUCF. PL { 1 ROANNE ST z ,' rj 2 L y n n CA PL IRUC[ ST BRUCE -. N s y z �) 0,2 N n �� %a 500 < n TV - sr :•o n i:� p m < < � < < $ < GILBERT S11. $ r :: � o: o m v011KE INEw < r':.. � ! JNU n ;SY:F::, . .L: GENEVA S7 v Pt- n Jr- 0 1ILLVIEW y n < ZOOS IOIIN ?%.,, . ., r;- p----� A < y1z r z 25-RD < 00 1000 ,T.�..o.. ^y o �I LAND LN O N c m o 9400 LN :m I o EY ST< u• Ii CDR 4E ST In �11 m A E vb .., �I N - 1-.ary m I MORAGA n.. MOfTAGA ST € _ Z (�° Si l3 op : : .I I y I ALA MO Sl �ZA ...• :i!I 7: 't m•, i.': :.. ALAMO r'I CH GGLE v i22 W IA ST f k�' t2 ;. ..' ST m O ST ..,WIMI ST ... .. .hl"I- ._. ol'p : Z.;�p - I NTURA ^.•E. .,? VENTURA —y I _ .. Mt'gSE, •c s EY Sl fv h: •�.. ` ST ST a MIIIS " �' 1111PILE RSMrr r 1 •'} m . I ^ MONT ERE Y -0 ENU n p9 AV ' H IE ST -2L'�'1 s I _ < <. ST EO n ` �_- TA IN DR I; A � I �• _ - :- y SIESTA a.�l •* <n ..-.....r.<: xy..! r; ST > :11 N FO S OOKMUR Ro in H z N " w 0 (n �QO� ID 2 100 (_A ILN ST :z mn Ig Dr , m HER o$T r Iu •+ � ,i I§LAi VA_IIEY ,NI .BEY 500< � F m ST z � IVY L-° � nar00 - "- - - ! ��•� ti o m \ D S • vAI II Y Sl - �S �}AL:' ' 8 ST EMPIRE. (•T y y �nTle WY�y, " AI UDIND AMEL A ST AIAUUIM 2 1 m WAKI FOREBt uu ,. in mn r--� m ST s cT@€HN!E�E' I � I CLIms dIIOLI.Y- - - a n PRIMROSE ;. S1 < n CAROL. DR olf - AR FERN S AGATE < pL� rI DAIILIA DR v . Utit. WT� o '� �ur'ni„ fl T PI 4Dt �� .{y h :• IAIRVIFW Sl o_ EXHIBIT 15 SUMMARY OF WATER RECLAMATION REGULATIONS Major Criteria or A ,en" Level Reaulalions Constraints Comments U.S. EPA Federal Safe Drinking Water AU (PL93.523) Sets national drinking water standards. U.S. EPA Federal Clean Water Act(PL95-217) Sets national wastewater treatment standards and encourage wastewater reclamation. State Water Resources Stale California Water Code;The Porter- Policies, procedures and Control Board (SWRCB) Cologne Water Quality Control ALI; guidelines for implementing Policy and Action Plan for Water water reclamation projects. Reclamation in California; Executive Order B-36-77 Dept. Water Resources Slate California Water Plan; Wastewater Criteria for reclaimed water (DWR) Reuse Law of 1974 (AB 3515) use to protect public health. Stale Air Resources Board Slate Dept. of Health Services State Title 22, CAC-Wastewater (DOHS) Reclamation Criteria Orange County County Review and comment on RWQCB Environmental Health permit proposals Agency Regional Water Quality Regional At a local level, enforces all aspects of Control Board (RWQCB) stale and federal law and regulations Pertaining to water. Southern California Air Regional Al a local level,enforce all aspects of Quality Management stale and federal laws and regulations District ((SCAQMD) pertaining to air. v reclaimed to fresh. It is likely this criteria would change the cost- effectiveness of the Sanitation Districts' water reclamation projects. Staff is working jointly with OCWD to revise this proposal. Staff estimates that it will take about five years to bring this project on-line, will need five separate major studies, an Environmental Impact Report and design plans and specs before construction can begin. Exhibit 16 summarizes these tasks and schedule. The estimated capital cost of this facility was $130 million as shown in Exhibit 17. Staff is proceeding on this schedule to implement the Sanitation Districts' water reclamation policy. To accomplish the water reclamation portion of its conservation plan, the Sanitation Districts has added another full-time professional staff member. The key responsibilities of this person include: • Coordinate with city, county and state agencies; • Develop industrial, municipal and commercial markets for reclaimed water; • Develop public information and education programs to gain acceptance of reclaimed water use; • Construct and operate up to three new water reclamation plants in cooperation with OCWD; and, • Monitor and coordinate with federal, state and regional regulators responsible for water reclamation; F. Summary In summary, the Sanitation Districts has an established and active water conservation program focused on industrial, commercial and institutional conservation plus a community education program for water conservation. The Sanitation Districts is undertaking new water conservation initiatives in the areas of industrial, commercial and institutional water conservation, residential water conservation and water reclamation. In support of these measures, two new professional staff have been hired. \/ CCN:hc Ref. 030051.rp -7- EXHIBIT 16 CRESCENT BASIN WATER RECLAMATION PLANT PROTECT IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE Time Schedule, Months Total Calendar Time to Months to Task Complete Task Start Complete A. Site Agreement 12 0 12 B. Reclaimed Water System Study 12 6 18 C. Injection Studies 12 6 18 D. Treatment System Study 12 6 18 E. Geologic Study 12 6 18 F. SCAQMD Health Effects Study 12 6 18 G. Environmental Impact Report 18 12 30 H. Prepare Plans & Specifications 18 24 42 I. Obtain Permits 24 18 42 J. Construction 30 44 74 EXHIBIT 17 COST ANALYSIS CRESCENT BASIN WATER RECLAMAT70N PLANT Capital O&M Annual Cost(a) Cost Cat Element (S1.0001 ($1.000/YPI (S1.000/YR) S/acre-foot Treatment Primary and Secondary $61,960 S1,500 S 7,000 S250 Advanced(b) 40,920 6.700 10.300 w Subtotal 102,880 8,200 17,300 665 Development Cats(c) 10,950 0 890 0 Water Reuse Facilities Groundwater Injection and Irrigation Conveyance 1G.444Q 1.770 Subtotal 26,950 350 2,660 75 Total Facilities (Including Reclamation) $129,830 SM50 S19,960 $740 Reclamation Portion Only(d) S56,920 S7,050 M070 S490 (a) Capital recovery at 8% per year, plus O&M costs; does not include land cats. (b) Additional costs for reclamation greater than projected secondary treatment costs. (c) Includes industrial waste diversions, trunk sewer diversions, sludge/brine return, site development costs, and flood control improvements. (d) Allocated portion of total facilities necessary to meet Title 22 reclamation requirements. Includes advanced treatment and water reuse facilities but does not include primary/secondary treatment costs necessary for ocean discharge. .,r APPENDIX C WASTE WATER DISPOSAL COMPANY SITE APPRAISAL LETTER �I APPRAISAL: 1321 S. STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD HASTE WATER DISPOSAL CO. PROPERTY FULLERTON, CALIFORNIA Date of Value: April 1, 1990 _ Prepared for: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. BOX 6127 Fountain Valley, California Attention: Thomas K. Dawes Director of Engineering Prepared by: The Schooler Company 17802 Irvine Boulevard Suite 131 Tustin, California 92680 (714) '669-1833 PAX (714) 731-3179 THE SCHOOLER COMPANY Appraisals and Urban Economics 17802 Irvine Boulevard, Suite 131 Tustin, California 92680 (714) 6694833 FAX (714) 731-3179 April 9, 1990 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728 Attention: Mr. Thomas M. Dawes, Director of Engineering Dear Mr. Dawes: As requested, The Schooler Company has made a current fair market appraisal of the industrial site owned by the Waste Water Disposal Co. located at 1321 S. State College Boulevard, in the City of Fullerton, California. This appraisal :a sought in connection with the proposed acquisition of the site, assuming it to be vacant land only and free of any ground contamination. The following summary letter report sets forth our findings and data and indicates our opinion of current fair market value. GENERAL DATA: Fair Market Value As defined in Chapter 1275, Title 7, Part 3 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, entitled EMINENT DOMAIN LAW, the fair market value of the property taken is the highest price on the date of valuation that would be agreed to by a seller, being willing to sell but under no particular or urgent necessity for so doing, nor obliged to sell, and a buyer, being ready, willing and able to buy under no particular necessity for so doing, each dealing with the other with full knowledge of all the uses and purposes for which the property is reasonably adaptable and available. Property Rights Valued The property rights valued herein are the fee simple estate of the entire land parcel. Function of the Valuation It is the function of this appraisal to provide the County Sanitation Districts with a current estimate of fair market value for the subject property, as if vacant and free of any ground contamination, relative to proposed acquisition of the entire site. Date of Value The date on which this valuation is predicated is April 1, 1990. Market Data Summary Industrial Acreage Sales Fullerton and North Orange County Sale Sales Price: Item Date Location Site sf/ac. Zoning T000 Iour. Total Psf A 12/89 S/s Fender Ave., 75,010+ MG Level None $681,500 $9.09 a/c State College 1.72+ - onslte Fullerton B 4/89 W/s Richfield Rd. , 291,977+ MO Level None $3,370,300 511.96 n/o Is Palma 6.47+ onslte Placentia C 3/89 E/s Allec St., 100,144+ GI Level, None 51,300,000 $12.38 n/o Cerritos Ave. 2.3+ cnsite Anaheim D 3/89 W/o Batavia St., 130,558+ ML Level Older $1,566,700 $12.30 n/o Grove Ave. 3.0+ metal Orange bldgs. E 12/88 W/s Levis St., 260,369+ GI Level None $3,261,000 $12.52 s/o Ball Rd. 5.98+ Anaheim F 12/88 W/s Ravmond Ave. , 812,830+ ML Level Older 58,340,000 $10.26 a/c Orangethor?e 18.66+ indus. Anaheim 61das. G 10/88 N/s Columbia, 277,477+ M1 Level None 32,497,500 $9.00 w/o Berry St. 6.37+ Brea R 8/88 SEC Valencia a 322,867+ MP Level None $3,050,500 $9.45 Sally Place 7.41+ Fullerton r� T Mr. Thomas M. Dawes -2- April 9, 1990 %M/ Highest and Best Use Highest and best use 1s defined as that reasonable and probable use that supports the highest present value, as vacant land or improved property, as defined, as of the effective date of the appraisal. Alternatively, the reasonably probable and legal use of land or sites as though vacant, found to be physically possible, appropriately supported, financially feasible and that results in highest present land value. (See following 'Subject Property' discussion. ) Principle of Substitution - This economics principle states that a prudent purchaser will pay no more to acquire one property than he need pay to acquire an equally-desirable substitute property on the open. market. This common sense concept is the underlying rationale for forming a value opinion for one property based on the known sales prices, improvement costs and/or income streams for comparable properties, and as such is inherent in each of the three traditional valuation approaches. Sales Comparison Approach This approach to valuation is the only approach used in this appraisal to indicate the value of the site as if vacant. in the Sales Comparison Approach, recent sales of similar properties are researched and then compared to the subject in order to identify and adjust for dissimilarities in size, location, utility, market conditions at and subsequent to sale data, and extraordinary influences. This approach is, of course, impacted by the availability, completeness and comparability of sale date discovered through the market data search. SUBJECT PROPERTY: The City of Fullerton Fullerton is located in northern Orange County, bounded by the Cities of Buena Park, La Habra, Brea, Placentia and Anaheim. Primary surface access is by way of I-5, State Highways 91 and 57; both rail and airport (private) access are also available. The City is a mature community, evidencing the full range of public and private facilities. Existing uses are primarily residential, with strong commercial and industrial components as well as cultural sources and educational institutions headed by the California State University, Fullerton, the Southern College of Optometry .and Fullerton College. �O Mr. Thomas M. Dawes -3- April 9, 1990 Subject Neighborhood - The subject is located along a primary commercial thoroughfare (State College Boulevard) 1/4 mile north of the 91 Freeway and 1/2 mile west of the 57 Freeway, in the southeastern corner of the City, just 70+ feet north of the Anaheim boundary. The area is characterized by a mix of industrial uses (primarily In Fullerton) and commercial/retail uses (primarily In Anaheim). . Surrounding uses include: -U.S. Rentals', 'Fullerton Medical Center', self-storage facilities and multi-tenant retail uses. Current zoning on the subject site is 'MG, General Industrial'; the General Plan designation for this area is 'Industrial'. Subject Prooerty The subject property, for. purposes of this appraisal, is assumed to be a graded, vacant 5.74± acre site, absent any on-site improvements and free of any sub-soil contamination. (The existing improvements, as directed, have _ not been taken into consideration in this appraisal.) The subject is identified as Orange County APN 073-2.31-12, with a street address of 1321 S. State College Boulevard, Fullerton. Current assessed. values are: $287,566 (land), $134,617 ( improvements), totalling $421,983 (based on a 1974 purchase date) . The owner apparent is Waste Water Disposal Co. ; their contact person is Mr. Scott Temple, (714) 525-4373. The site has unrestricted legal access to State College Boulevard; offsite improvements include asphalt street paving, concrete curbs, gutters and si6ewalks, and street lighting. All standard utilities are in and operating on-site. Eighest and best use for the subject site, considered as if vacant, is indicated to be industrial-use development, of a type that would be consistent with market demand and optimize the site's freeway proximity and major-thoroughfare frontage. ' VALUATION: The subject was compared and contrasted with the industrial land sales summarized on the facing page. These sales were derived from a data search that started in the City of Fullerton and expanded to include Anaheim, Buena Park, Placentia, Brea, La Habra and Orange. The broad scope of the search was needed because very few vacant industrial acreage sites exist in the highly-developed North Orange County area. n Mr. Thomas M. Dawes -4- April 9, 1990 �1 Adjustments were made to the reported sales price for each property in order to eliminate from consideration the significant differences between the sale properties and the subject property. The comparable sales range In date from December, 1989 back to August, 1988; accordingly, each of the sales prices was adjusted somewhat upward to reflect the overall upward trend in industrial land prices. Items C, D, E and F were adjusted downward for their overall superior location. Items A, B, C, E and G were adjusted upward for their frontage on secondary thoroughfares; Item E was adjusted downward for its superior corner location features such as access and high visibility. Items D and F were adjusted upward to include the demolition cost for existing, older on-site improvements. Overall, Item A is considered most comparable to the subject, primarily lacking the major-thoroughfare frontage and a portion of the proximity to freeways. After all adjustments were made, the indicated current fair market value for the subject property, as if vacant and as if. free from any ground contamination, is THREE MILLION DOLLARS $3,000,000; equates to $12.00± psf of land area Your attention is directed to the statements of 'Limiting Conditions' and 'Certification by Appraiser' will follow and which form an integral part of this report. We have retained in our files a complete copy of this letter report as well as supporting documents such as field notes, maps and photographs. If you need any further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for the opportunity to provide appraisal services to the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. Yours truly, THE SCHOOLER COMPANY ' Diane�D. Schooler President DDS:pw RE: AGENDA ITEM NO, 15 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA May 23, 1990 1° E115 AVEWE no SO.ell) EW W..VGLLFY GLIMAWA 927289127 O1a,952.Nn REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE/FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEES Meeting Date: May 23, 199o - 5: 0 p.m. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE: Present: Present: Buck Catlin Joint Chairman William Mahoney, Chairman William Mahoney Vice Joint Chairman Don R. Griffin Don R. Griffin Past Joint Chairman James Neal Richard B. Edgar Past Joint Chairman Peer Swan James Wahner Chairman, District 1 James Wahner Iry Pickler Chairman, District 2 Richard Polls Chairman, District 3 Absent: Evelyn Hart Chairman, District 5 Ruthelyn Plummer Chairman, District 6 Wayne Silzel Don E. Smith Chairman, District 7/Past JC Wayne Wedin Grace Winchell Chairman, District 11 Hank Wedaa Chairman, District 13 Peer A. Swan Chairman, District 14 STAFF PRESENT: Don Roth County Supervisor J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Absent: Blake Anderson, Dir. Technical Svcs. Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering Norman E. Culver Past Joint Chairman Gary Streed, Director of Finance Roger Stanton County Supervisor Ed Hodges, Sr. Facilities Manager, Maintenance Bob Ooten, Assistant Superintendent, OTHERS PRESENT: Operations Rich von Langen, Source Control Mgr. Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel 1) Fiscal Policy Committee Recommendations re 1990-91 Joint Works Budgets. Fiscal Policy Chairman Mahoney reported that the Committee had met several times over the past few months to consider the 1990-91 Joint Works Budgets. He reviewed the enclosed booklet containing the following budgetary recommendations: A. Personnel Recommendations (blue): Fifty-five new positions are recommended to provide staffing to operate and maintain the facilities required by major treatment plant expansion and to support related activities and new program implementation to comply with changing regulatory requirements. Many of these positions will not be filled (1 of 6) Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees' Report May 23, 1990 until later in the year, and some may not be filled at all if completion of construction projects is delayed. The recommended positions are in support of a variety of programs as detailed in the budget and summarized below: Summary of Proposed Additional Staffing Program/System Position Management Board Secretary 8 Management Support 2 Personnel 1 Finance Accounting <1> Information Services 5 Operations and Maintenance Sewage Collection Systems 4 General Plant and Equipment Maintenance it Treatment Plant Operations/Training 8 Technical Services Regulatory Compliance (Air, Land, Water) 2 Source Control Program 7 Process Monitoring and Laboratory 5 Engineering Facilities Planning and Design 5 Construction Management 6 Total 55 The recommended new positions will raise the authorized staffing level from 571 to 626 at an added maximum annual salary cost of $1,960,630. Employee benefits add approximately 30% to the salary costs. B. Joint Operating Fund (green): The net cost of administering the Joint Districts' activities and operating and maintaining the Joint Treatment Works for 1990-91 is estimated at $50.2 million. Revenues and other offsets in the amount of $2.6 million will reduce the net Joint Operations requirements to $47.6 million, up 6.9% from the 1989-90 budget. Of this, 3.0% (a little less than half) of the increase is due to inflation and plant expansion, and 3.9% (a little more half) is the result of regulatory mandates. (2 of 6) Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees' Report May 23, 1990 C. Self-Funded Insurances: Included in the Joint Operating Budget, the following self-funde insurance budgets are consistent with the Boards' past actions relative to these plans: 1. Workers' Compensation (pink) 2. Self-Funded Health Plan (goldenrod) 3. Liability (salmon) D. CORF Joint Works Construction (yellow): The CORF budget sets forth a �103.4 million treatment plant construction program for 1990-91 in accordance with the 30-year Master Plan adopted by the Boards last year. Recommendation The Committees recommend approval of the proposed 1990-91 personnel requirements and Joint Works Operating and Construction Budgets. 2) Authorizing Fiscal Policy Comm ttee to Place Districts' 1990-91 Workers' ompensation Excess Insurance coverage. The Districts' Workers' Compensation Excess Coverage insurance policy expires on July 1, 1990. The Districts' present policy for statutory workers' compensation coverage (unlimited benefits) with an annual self-insured retention level of $250,000 carries an annual premium of $31,835. Because of the way the insurance marketplace works, the Districts' broker has advised that he may not have quotations for the 1990-91 coverage in time for consideration by the Boards at the regular June meeting. Inasmuch as the current coverage will expire between the Boards' June 13th and July llth regular meetings, staff recommended that the Fiscal Policy Committee be authorized and directed to evaluate proposals obtained by the Districts' insurance broker and place appropriate excess workers' compensation coverage effective July 1, 1990; and that the actions taken by the Fiscal Policy Committee be submitted to the Joint Boards for ratification or revision at the regular meeting on July llth. This is similar to the procedure followed by the Boards in past years. Recommendation: The Committees concur with the staff's recommendation to authorize the Fiscal Policy Committee to place the Workers' Compensation excess coverage insurance effective July 1, 1990, subject to ratification by the Boards. 3) Air Quality Issues. A. SCAQMD Clean Air Award to Districts Joint Chairman Catlin recognized Chairman Wedaa who described a Clean Air Awards Program that he was instrumental in establishing last year at the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The program recognizes organizations and individuals that have made significant contributions to reducing air pollution. (3 of 6) Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees' Report May 23, 1990 v Chairman Wedaa stated that he was pleased to inform the Directors that the Sanitation Districts will be the recipient of a 1990 Clean Air Award in the category of Model Community Achievements to be presented on June 7th. He noted that all Board members received a copy of the Districts' clean air achievements submittal in April. B. Air Quality Issues Update Report The staff reviewed and the Directors discussed at considerable length the enclosed Air Quality Issues Update Report summarizing the current status of several major Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) issues that affect the Districts. C. Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for Air Treatment Optimization Study The enclosed Air Quality Issues Update Staff Report includes a recommendation to engage John Carollo Engineers to perform a foul air treatment optimization study at a cost not to exceed $85,000. The study would make recommendations for changes in the SCAQMD operating permit conditions to clarify ambiguous language, and system enhancement for operational effectiveness and efficiencies. The Directors discussed at some length the need to conduct the study, alternatives, including the respective responsibilities of the Districts and SCAQMD, and the cost of such studies during which staff reported that they expect to realize reduced annual operating costs from operational refinements that will result from the study that will more than offset its cost. Recommendation: The Committees recommend approval of a professional services agreement with John Carollo Engineers to perform a foul air treatment study for an amount not to exceed $85,000. Directors Polis, Roth, Smith and Wahner requested that their opposition to conducting the study at Districts' expense be made a matter of record. 4) Revisions to Management Vehicle Policy. A proposal to revise the Districts' Management Vehicle Policy was referred to the Fiscal Policy Committee to study and report back to the Executive Commi ttee. 5) Status Report on Industrial Waste Enforcement Actions. The General Counsel provided the Committee with the following update on the status of industrial waste enforcement actions. (4 of 6) Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees' Report May 23, 1990 A. Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson vs. CSD. The General Counsel reported that both sides had undertaken discovery in furtherance of preparing the case for final hearing, the discovery being in the form of reviewing records of both the permittee and of the District. The General Counsel also noted that there was a mandatory settlement conference scheduled for June 6, 1990, and a hearing on the District's motions for denial of the writ of mandate and for summary judgment on the Plaintiff's cause of action for inverse condemnation. The motions will be heard on June 14, 1990. The General Counsel then reviewed the aspects of the pending motions and the settlement conference, and after a brief discussion, direction was provided to Mr. Woodruff as to proceeding. B. Universal Circuits (UCI) vs. CSD. 1. Liti ation re Permit at ExistingFacility, 1800 Newport Circle, anta Ana, alITornia. The General Counsel reported that the judgment had been signed by Judge Weeks and notice of the entry of judgment served on UCI. The previously-issued stay order which allows Universal Circuits to continue to discharge remains in effect pursuant to the terms of the judgment until such time as UCI files an appeal or the statutory time in which to do so has expired. Counsel reported that no indication of filing the appeal was forthcoming and that UCI was under the impression that they would be unable to continue discharging from the existing facility. After a brief discussion, counsel was instructed by the Committee to oppose any further application for stay order by UCI, and staff was reauthorized to reorder the termination of all discharges from the existing facility when legally permitted to do so. 2. New Facility at 2249 South Yale Street, Santa Ana, California. The General Counsel reported that the General Manager had denied the application for a permit for UCI's new facility and that this was the time for the Executive Committee to schedule a hearing based upon the appeal of UCI dated May 25, 1990, and received by the District the same date. The Committee then established July 12, 1990 at 6:00 p.m. as the date and time for the hearing of the appeal . Staff and counsel are to give notice to UCl/Appellant, in accordance with the Districts' adopted Rules of Procedure for Appeals. 3. CSD vs. UCI re Action to Collect Penalties. The General Counsel reported that this action filed by the District to recover penalties for the illegal discharges from UCI 's Newport Circle facility was not entitled to priority and was simply proceeding in the ordinary course of actions in the Superior Court. (5 of 6) Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees' Report May 23, 1990 The General Counsel further noted that there have been some nominal attempts to discuss a comprehensive settlement of the old facility (Newport Circle) permit, new facility (South Yale Street) permit, and the recovery of penalties, but that to date no meaningful offer of settlement had been received from UCI with regards to the principal subjects of interest to the District. After considerable discussion, the General Counsel was given direction as to the outline of any possible settlement that would be proposed by UCI and would be considered for acceptance by the District. JWS:sc Encl. (6 of 6) . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 0 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA May 16, 1990 109Gt ELLIB 4VENNE F.O.WX 9127 FWNTMN VAIEV.CALWORNIA SM9412I n1M962.4n STAFF REPORT AIR OOAl= ISSUES UPDATE 1. ISSUES RE SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MAIMMIENr DISTRCCr Most of the Districts' construction and operational activities are subject to review and regulation by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAM). The evolution of SCROM new rules and amendments to existing rules is continuous, resulting in ever-tightening limits imposed on the Districts' operations. The 1989 Air Quality Management Plan, the federal Clean Air Act, the California Clean Air Act and political and public opinion forces will result in new requina9wnts that may have significant impact on the Districts. our ability to construct and operate new wastewater treatment facilities to meet service demands and more stringent water quality limitations my be severely restricted. In the last few months, the Districts' staff has had extensive involvement with the SCAUM on several proposed amendments to existing rules, and on operational disputes on the Districts' odor facilities. The following is a brief explanation of some of the issues. Action is requested on Item A. The reining items are informational only at this time. A. operation of Odor Control Facilities The Districts have completed the installation of foul air collection and deodorizing facilities at both treatment plants. Foul air is collected from influent trunk sewers, headworks, primary collection facilities and sludge dewatering facilities, and deodorized in 30 faul air scrubbers. The odor control facilities, the largest voluntary odor control retrofit in the United States, were built under several separate permits to construct (PTCs), each with numerous conditions issued by SCAM. These permits overlap with other general treatment plant permits and, as a result, the conditions have become somewhat confusing, particularly for SCAQMD inspectors. On April 16 and 19, the Enforcement Division of SCACpm issued Notices of Violation (NOV) for the Fountain Valley treatment plant facilities, citing Condition No. 4, which reads w follows: "This equipment must not be operated unless it is vented to air pollution control systems which are in full use and which have been issued permits to construct by Executive Officer." -1- The Districts were operating four of the odor control scrubbers at the time. Based on operational and compL:ance experience, we had found that this number of scrubbers was sufficient. SCAUAD Enforcement Division interpreted the permit condition to mean that all ten scrubbers had to be operated. The Districts' original engineering design data for the scrubbers that we submitted in support of the SCAQMD permit application was based on influent air q,am;ty assumptions which have been found today to be extremely conservative. The amber of scrubbers identified in the permit was based on this conservative estimate. But actual operating conditions have been far less severe than anticipated. Accordingly, the Districts have operated only the number of scrubbers necessary to meet the discharge concentrations allowed in the permit and the Districts have never violated discharge requirements. The Notices of Violation were issued because all scrubbers were riot operating. The Enforcement Division, even after consultation with our staff and General Counsel, issued the NOVs believing that all scrubbers should be operated. The Districts immediately put all scrubbers on line, which not only resulted in excess operating costs, but SCAQ,+ff1 had to be called to request an emergency operating variance under SCAQM breakdown procedure for routine maintenance of the scrubbers. However, after meeting with Districts' engineering and legal staff, SMM has now allowed the Districts to resume the normal operating pattern,. i.e. operating only those scrubbers necessary to meet discharge requirements. This incident has pointed out that the operating conditions need to be better understood and clarified so that the Districts and the SCACM Enforcement Division no longer have misunderstandings, gar this reason, staff is proposing to hire John Carrillo Engineers to perform a Foul Air Treatment Optimization Study. The work would have two objectives. First, the study would review existing permit conditions and make recca++endations for changes in both operating and discharge conditions. These recmmendations will be reviewed by the Districts and submitted to SCA= for its consideration in drafting amended operating permit condition language. Second, because the Districts have experienced certain types of odors which are not being sufficiently reduced by the scrubbers, the scrape of work will include a study of existing scrubber performance. (The scrubbers treat hydrogens sulfides, but other odor-producing compounds appear to be insufficiently removed by the present air treatment process.) Staff believes that modifying operation of the scrubbers to take into account climate conditions and possibly raising stack heights may reduce the potential for complaints from these odors. Based on the knowledge gained to date in the operation of the odor control facilities, the fine-tmu'ing requested has pote� for lowering Districts' operating costs, further reducing odor emissions and eliminating problems in condition interpretation with the SCAUD. The final report world make operating and discharge condition recommendations which would be subsequently submitted to the MVID by the Districts. -2- Carollo has worked on marry of the systems and can begin work immediately on the necessary studies. Staff is requesting that the v Executive Committee recce end approval of a professional services agreement with John Carrillo Engineers to undertake the studies noted above. The cost is estimated as follows: Professional Services, (hourly rates including labor plus overhead at 155%), not to exceed $65,000.00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 3,000.00 a bcons„1tants, not to exceed 10,000.00 Fixed Profit 7,000.00 ESTDOM D 1OML, not to exceed $85,000.00 B. Revision to SCAQMD Rule 431.1: Sulfur in Gaseous Ebel On May 4, 1990 SCAOM amended Rule 431.1 which regulates the sulfur content of gaseous fuels burned in the air basin including the Districts' digester gas. The existing rule limits digester gas sulfur content to 800 parts per million (ppm) and 250 ppm if the gas is sold. Presently, the Districts are operating under permits to operate issued by SCACM Which limit the hydrogen sulfide in our digester gas to 100 ppm. Rule 431.1 will require the Districts to comply with a limit of 40 ppm total sulfur beginning May 4, 1992. In order to meet the requiremerit of 40 ppm, additional digester chemicals and/or gas scrubbing equipment will be required. There are several potential methods to reduce the level of sulfides in the gas, and a selection will be made based on system reliability, a pez: ence in operating such a unit and enonariic evaluation. As the Districts provided in written and oral testimorry to SC.AQM staff and its Board, the ability to consistently achieve 40 ppm is presently - poorly understood. Control technology and cost information will be developed by staff. C. New Source Review The SCACMD is proposing amendments to Regulation.XIII, New Source Review, which could have serious implications for the Districts. Pdoption is presently scheduled for June 22, 1990. Within the requirements for obtaining a permit to construct is a requirement to offset air emissions resulting from the project. The Districts' long-term position has been that PO1Ws should not be subject to the offset req=ement, since they are non-elective public services which must be constructed in the air basin. Under the proposed amendments to Regulation XIII, all new emissions must be offset and the existing purchased and banked emission credit -3- program will be replaced with a "Community Bank" administered by SCACPM. The Community Bank proposal includes a "Priority Reserve" of emission reduction credits for essential public services that includes sewage treatment plants and landfills. The SCAM is assuming that the Priority Reserve system will contain sufficient offset credits to allow essential public services to construct new facilities. However, the SCAQMD staff report and supporting environmental analysis do not provide a technical analysis that would form a basis for this assertion. In point of fact, the Community Bank and its subset, the Priority Reserve, depend upon the year-by-year attainment of basin-wide emission reductions. In the event that basin-wide objectives are not achieved, the Community Bank will be reduced accordingly. Therefore, the various wastewater agencies, landfills and other critical public services will be vying for a limited offset hank. Carried to its logical, worst-case scenario, the Districts would not be able to construct new facilities because of insufficient Priority Reserve offset credits. In the absence of the ability to construct new facilities, the Districts, the Regional Water Quality Control Board or EPA would eventually be placed in the position of having to limit future sewer connections. The Districts may be in a better position than most other POTWs because of the purchased emission credits we now hold in reserve. While these purchased emissions will be discounted under proposed Regulation XIII, there would still be a bank available to at least meet our short-term needs. We, along with.our sister POFIWs, are continuing to work with SCAQM to attempt to either exempt PO1Ws or develop final rule language that will enable necessary Wastewater treatment facilities to be constructed. D. Proposed Rule 1110.2. Electrification of Stationary Internal Canbustion Enoines This proposed rule covers all stationary combustion engines over 50 horsepower. The rule will reduce the permit condition of oxides of nitrogen (MX), carbon monoxide (CO) and reactive organic gases (ROG) for sewage digester fueled engines (most other engines must be converted to electric motors). The reductions are substantial. Limits proposed by SCAUM are less than the limits contained in the permit to construct conditions for the Central Power Generation Systems. The Directors will recall that the new engines now being delivered are state-of-the-art design, and if this rule is adopted the Districts will have to further reduce the emissions from these engines at considerable expense in either engine efficiency or by the installation of catalytic converters. At the meeting staff will brief the Directors on the implications of this rule. E. Conformity with Air Quality Management Plan The 1989 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) is functioning as this region's implementation plan to achieve the requirements of the federal Clean Air Act. All activities in the basin that require permits issued by the federal goverment (or an agency delegated authority by the federal government) mist conform to the AQMP. This means that our ocean discharge permit which is issued by the federal EPA and the California -4- For the Districts, there are, two tests of conformity. First, our facilities most be constructed in a stair-step manner that coincides with the population projections adopted by the Southern California Association of Governments. The second test of conformity for the Districts is that the cities and the County which we serve conform to the Ate. In the event all cities do not conform, then a mitigation plan created by the Districts, SCAG, SCAQMD and the affected local governments nest be approved by EPA and adopted by the Regional Water Quality Control Board in our next discharge permit. The Districts are in conformity with the first test. The thirty-year master plan which we completed last year is, in fact, a model of the concept of pacing new wastewater treatment facilities with the projected population figures of SCAG. However, the second test of conformity is far more difficult to achieve. At the present time, very few, if any, of the cities in Orange County have achieved conformity with the PAN. Their general plans have not been amended to include air quality elements, and most have not adopted the traffic control and parking access measures identified in the ACM. Therefore, at least in the short term, the Districts will not be in conformity with the second test, and permits to construct issued by the SCAUM and a issuance of a new N= permit cannot occur. A mitigation plan will necessarily have to be created in the short term to address our conformity requirements. Districts' staff have been in contact with several groups that are now attempting to coordinate Orange County local goverment conformity with the AQMP. Representatives of the Orange County City/County Coordination Committee, the SCRUM, SCAG and the Orange County League of Cities have been involved in this effort to some degree. A workshop was held May 3 in Santa Ana by the Orange County City/County Coordination Committee to provide an overview of the sub-regional responsibilities of local government in Orange County. Staff members of the above-named organizations, as well as members of the planning departments of several Orange County cities, agree that a far more detailed "nuts and bolts" approach needs to be provided to local government. For this reason, the Districts' staff, working in either a lead or support role, will involve themselves with these other organizations to provide the workshops necessary to advance local goverment conformity so that the Districts' long-teem master plan objectives will not be delayed. F. Proposed SCAW Rule 1401: Air Toxics SCAW has announced that the long-awaited Rule 1401 is scheduled for an adoption hearing on Thursday, May 17. Districts' staff have been involved in the evolution of this rule for more than two years. While the results of the hearing are not known at the time of the writing of this staff report, it is anticipated that Rule 1401 will be adopted as it is now proposed. The rule will require that best available control technology for air toxics be constructed for any new facilities that increase the theoretical risk of cancer to the most exposed individual to greater than one in a million. Compliance would be required in May 1995 for any of the Districts' new construction projects that receive a permit to -5- construct after May 1990. The rule will allow new projects to be retrofitted with todca control technology after it is developed. - Districts' staff believe that SCAQMD's agreement to allow retrofitting is a major and important Concession and demonstrates they acknowledge our water quality protection concerns. The five-year delay for caffp1iance will be very helpful to the Districts in trying to achieve conformity with the air tovics control regulations. However, as discussed below, the time schedule will be very tight. At the present time there is no known technology to control air taxies at POTWs. The Districts and other PCTWs in Southern California will be working in regional and national cooperative studies to develop the necessary technology. 2, FREMIAL CLEAN AM ACr AM MMENrS OF 1990 In addition to the requirements now imposed by the SCACM, new requirements are being proposed and the provisions of the amended federal Clean Air Act. Most observers agree that the Clean Air Act will be successfully adopted during this session of Congress. For the Districts, requirements for the control of volatile organic compounds (6VCs) from our exi and new wastewater treatment processes is a likely outcome. POiWs which .ixasase the theoretical risk of cancer for the mast exposed individual to a risk greater than one in a million will be requi.red to provide control technology to reduce the risk to less than one in a million. Mae present language of the Senate version of the Clean Air Act will require control measures that cold include source control, material subsUtutimh, product bans, changes an operational procedures and the addition of in-plant control technology. Working closely with representatives of the California Association of Sanitation Agencies and the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, the Districts' staff have been instrumental in ensuring that PO1Ws have sufficient time to develop control technology prior to requirements going into effect. As presently written, the Senate version would require that regulations be promulgated by EPA five years after adoption of the Clean Air Act amendments and PMWs would be required to achieve the regulations three years after that. With a total of only eight years to develop, design, construct and start up facilities, these requirements of the Clean Air Act will be technology-faroing and will require a great deal of research effort. Districts' staff have not with key representatives with EPA (as recently as May 14) to encourage EPA to participate in and fund cooperative R&D studies with key PO1Ws so that the technology can be developed in a timely, econamac and coordinated national effort. Staff will further brief the Directors on the implications of these issues at the Executive Committee meeting. -6- SCAQMD RULES/PLANS IMPACTING CSDOC • RULE 431 .1 : SULFUR IN GASEOUS FUEL • REG. XIII: NEW SOURCE REVIEW • RULE 1110.2: INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES • AQMP: CONFORMITY REQUIREMENTS • RULE 1401 : AIR TOXICS RULE 431 .1 : SULFUR IN GASEOUS FUEL AMENDED: MAY 45 1990 COMPLIANCE: MAY 4, 1992 • CONSIDERABLE CSDOC COMMENTS • CSDOC PRODUCES 4,000,000 CFD • 40 PPM TOTAL SULFUR • CONTIN. MONITORING (OR EQUIVALENT) • CSDOC LIMIT NOW 100 PPM T.S. • CSDOC PRE-1985 3000 PPM T.S. • CSDOC NOW 45-90 PPM T.S. • FUTURE TECHNOLOGY = ? • FUTURE MONITORING = ? • FUTURE $ _ ? • CSDOC R&D BEING PLANNED REGULATION XIII : NEW SOURCE REVIEW `AMENDMENT: JUNE 28, 1990 COMPLIANCE: 3 MONTHS LATER • ONGOING DIALOGUE WITH SCAQMD • NINE RULES UNDER THE REGULATION • "BACT" AND OFFSETS FOR ALL NEW OR MODIFIED SOURCES FOR NON-ATTAINMENT POLLUTANTS • OFFSET FROM PRIORITY RESERVE OF COMMUNITY BANK (AFTER USING EXISTING ERCs) • CSDOC'S ACCOUNT HAS 520 LBS/DAY ROG • "CLEAN SLATE" VS. OFFSETS BACK TO 1976 • PROPOSED RULES APPLY TO ERC CALCS • PORTABLE EQUIPMENT • EMERGENCY OPERATIONS EXEMPT BUT... THE "COMMUNITY BANK" OF REGULATION XIII • SMALL BUSINESSES • ESSENTIAL PUBLIC SERVICES • PRIORITY RESERVE • REACTIVE ORGANIC GASES (ROGS) AS AN EXAMPLE: ANNUAL ALLOCATION LB DAY -BASIN-WIDE REDUCTIONS 43100 -USABLE REDUCTIONS 22200 -TO COMMUNITY BANK 18000 (12600) -TO PRIORITY RESERVE 2000 (1400) • 60 MGD PRIMARY EMITS 84 LBS/DAY ROG • CSDOC HAS 520 LBS/DAY ROG IN ACCOUNT RULE 1110.2: ELECTRIFICATION OF STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES COMPLIANCE DATE: DECEMBER 31 , 1994 • PURPOSE: REPLACE ENGINES WITH ELECTRIC MOTORS • EXISTING CSDOC ENGINES TO BE RETIRED • BUT 8 NEW CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEMS AFFECTED • EXISTING LIMITS: 76 PPM NOX • PROPOSED: ABOUT 40 PPM NOX • COST TO COMPLY: - CAPITAL: UNKNOWN, 5-10 MILLION - OPERATING : 5-10% EFFICIENCY LOSS - MONITORING COSTS AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN: CONFORMITY REQUIREMENTS - AQMP ADOPTED: MARCH 1989 HANDBOOKS APPROVED: MARCH & MAY 1990 COMPLIANCE: NOW • IMPACTS OCEAN DISCHARGE PERMIT AND PTC/PTO • TWO TESTS OF CONFORMITY: -STAGED CONSTRUCTION (NO PROBLEM) -CONFORMING LOCAL GOV'T (A PROBLEM) • CONFORMING LOCAL GOV'T MEANS: - IMPLEMENT LOCAL GOV'T MEASURES - AMEND GENERAL PLAN - STAFF-UP TO IMPLEMENT - SELF REPORT ON PROGRESS • MITIGATION PLAN IF NON-CONFORMING • STATUS: VIRTUALLY NO LOCAL GOV'TS • WORKSHOPS -CITY/COUNTY COORDINATING COMMITTEE -LEAGUE OF CITIES -SCAQ M D -SCAG -DISTRICTS • CONTINUED DISTRICTS INVOLVEMENT RULE 1401 : AIR TOXICS UNDER CONSIDERATION: EARLY 1987 NEXT ADOPTION HEARING: JUNE 1990(?) COMPLIANCE DATE: UNCERTAIN • 10 COMPOUNDS (TODAY) • MUST USE BACT IF 1 -IN-A-MILLION RISK • BACT MUST CONTROL TO 10-IN-A-MILLION • 5-YEAR DELAY FOR POTWS • BACT WILL BE TOUGH - SHORT TIME FRAME - LARGE AIR VOLUMES - LOW CONCENTRATIONS - AIR IS WET AND COOL • R&D EFFORTS SOON - COOPERATIVE STUDIES - REGIONAL, STATE, FEDERAL _ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 1990-91 JOINT WORKS _ BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Njt ►17 TloAt .Opolitan Or �Js� a J a eo � � w Siace 1954 _ ''GE CO�� MAY 23, 1990 .e May 23, 1990 MEMORANDUM To: Board of Directors From: Executive Committee Subject: Summary Report and Recommendations re 1990-91 Joint Works Budgets (Personnel, Joint Operating Fund and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund) Recommendation ,. The Executive Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee' s recommendation to adopt the enclosed 1990-91 Joint Works Personnel, Operating and Construction Budgets. Summary Report The accompanying budget documents provide detailed information concerning the proposed Joint Works budgets. The following discussion highlights and summarizes the recommendations for the three elements of the Joint Works budgets. Personnel (See Blue Report) New Positions Summary: Staff has previously advised the Directors that major treatment plant expansion underway and new program implementation to comply with changing regulatory requirements would require significant staffing increases to operate and maintain the new facilities and to support related activities and other required programs. Over the past five years we have completed and placed into service $62 .2 million of new plant facilities and equipment. We currently have $106.5 million in new treatment plant facilities under construction that will have been completed and placed into service during the 1989-90 budget year; another $111. 1 million in treatment plant facilities that will be completed during the next few years; and $24 .5 million in individual District facilities under construction. An additional $251.3 million in treatment facilities and $64.2 million in collection facilities are being designed and will be constructed and placed into service over the next several years. The 30-year Action Plan Master Plan adopted by the Boards last year projects capital improvements totalling $1 .48 billion (in 1989 dollars ) under current NPDES permit conditions. V Page 2 i V This year our various departments requested 72 new positions. The General Manager has reviewed those requests with the Department Heads and is recommending 55 new positions for �. 1990-91. Many of these positions will not be filled until later in the year, and some may not be filled at all in 1990-91 if completion of construction projects is delayed. Two of the 55 positions are part-time, and four are to replace part-time positions being deleted. Summary of Proposed Additional Staffinc �+ Program/System Position V Management Board Secretary 6 Support 2 Personnel 1 Finance v Accounting <1> Information Services 5 Ytl Operations and Maintenance Sewage Collection Systems 4 General Plant and Equipment Maintenance 11 Treatment Plant Operations/Training 8 Technical Services Regulatory Compliance (Air, Land, Water) 2 Source Control Program 7 �. Process Monitoring and Laboratory 5 Engineering Y/ Facilities Planning and Design 5 Construction Management 6 Total 55 The proposed new positions would raise the authorized staffing level from 571 to 626, an increase of approximately 9.6%. Annual Cost Based upon the anticipated need to fill the proposed new positions over the course of the next year, the recommendations would add $1,960,630 or approximately 9.8%, to the estimated fiscal year 1990-91 salary budget. Employee benefits paid by the Districts including retirement, health, life, disability, workers' compensation � : Page 3 and unemployment insurance and uniforms would add approximately 30% to the salary totals. Management Department - Board Secretary's Office: A Secretary position is proposed to provide additional clerical support to the Board Secretary and to the General Manager on matters pertaining to the Boards of Directors' activities and official Districts' records. - Management Support: An Office Aide position is recommended to -� be transferred from the Accounting Division to place all Office Aides in the same organizational unit. .� - Personnel and Safety/Security: An additional Personnel Analyst is proposed for this division to provide additional office support on employee matters for the expanding work force. Finance Department - Accounting: The Office Aide position is recommended to be transferred to the Management Support Group to place all Office Aides in the same organizational unit. .n - Information Services: This new division has been effective in reducing our reliance on consultants and is in constant demand for both hardware and software problem solving and for implementing new systems. Three Programmer positions are proposed to provide support for a new maintenance management system and implementation of a plant process monitoring and control system at Plant No. 1, and an additional Information Services Technician III is recommended to provide additional hardware support. A Senior Graphics .Technician position is ,e proposed to separate the division's secretarial work load from the expanded graphics and desktop publishing services. Operations and Maintenance Department General Superintendent's Office: Reclassification of the Emergency Preparedness Coordinator to the Senior Engineer level is proposed to facilitate recruiting a suitable qualified employee. An additional Engineer with experience in electrical .., power generation and distribution is proposed for the Central Power Generation Facilities now under construction. An Engineering Aide II position is recommended to replace an .. Engineering Aide I to more properly reflect the expanded duties. An additional Senior Clerk position is proposed to provide support for the training section of the Operations Division. r s Page 4 II 6d - Plant Maintenance: Two Maintenance Field Supervisor positions are proposed to replace one Senior Foreman position to provide a l middle manager at each plant to better direct the leadmen and workers. Two Equipment Operator positions are proposed for deletion because of increasing use of private contractors in our off-site sludge reuse program. - Collection Facilities: Two Collection Facilities Field Supervisor positions are recommended: one for the trunk sewer maintenance group and one for the pump station maintenance group. This change will allow the down rating of two Collection Facilities Supervisor positions to Foreman positions. An � I additional Senior Collection Facilities Worker and a Collection v Facilities Worker II are proposed to round out existing and new crews. it - Mechanical Maintenance: Four Senior Mechanic, one Equipment Operator and two Mechanic positions are proposed to cover expanding work loads from major new facilities. V - Electrical Maintenance: One Lead Electrical Technician position is recommended to replace an electrical Technician I position to J � provide better work force control and safer working conditions. 'y - Instrumentation Maintenance: Because of increasingly sophisticated controls and instruments in all new facilities, one each additional Instrument Technician II, Instrument Technician I and Instrument Maintenance Man positions are proposed. VI - Plant Operations: An additional Shift Supervisor position is proposed to provide additional process control supervision, to oversee ongoing operational requirements and to assist with regulatory compliance. A Senior Plant Operator position is recommended to serve as the coordinator at Plant No. 1 between major construction contractors and the ongoing treatment plant operational requirements. Nine Plant Operator positions are proposed to increase staffing during the non-daytime shifts and to expand the in-house training and retraining program. Four I part-time Control Center Clerk positions are proposed to be `+ deleted in favor of an additional full-time Control Center Clerk. i Technical Services Department - Director of Technical Services' Office: A new position, Air L Quality Manager is recommended to maintain agency wide coordination and effective responsiveness in a rapidly changing and growing regulatory arena. II u - Compliance: One additional Senior Clerk position is proposed to provide clerical support to free the professional staff and to assist the Division's Secretary. y Page 5 - Laboratory: Four Lab Analyst positions are recommended to free four higher lever positions that have been bumped down and to staff the increased sampling program by the Source Control Division. One Clerk position is proposed to provide needed clerical support now being supplied by a Lab Helper who will be ,r better utilized. - Source Control: An Associate Engineer position is proposed for the Special Projects Section to provide improved liaison and contract administration and an Assistant Engineer is proposed for the Permits Section to implement the recently revised industrial waste ordinance. Title changes are recommended for four .. positions, changing "Industrial Waste" to "Source Control" to more properly reflect the nature of the Divisions, work mission. One Source Control Inspector II and one Source Control Inspector I positions are proposed to increase the sampling effort. A Senior Clerk and two Part-Time Assistant positions are proposed to provide additional clerical support and data entry and to collect data for the industrial/commercial user fee program. Engineering Department - Planning and Design Management: An Engineer position is proposed to coordinate and review increasingly complex electrical and instrumentation design and an Associate Engineer position is proposed to assist in administering the many concurrent new projects under design and prepare them for bidding. A Senior Engineering Aide, an Engineering Aide II and an Engineering Aide I positions are recommended to begin work on complete computerized composite drawings of the plants and to assist the professional staff with exhibits and drawings. Construction Management: An Engineer position is proposed to provide ongoing project management services now provided by an s, outside consultant. A Principal Engineering Associate position is proposed for a new quality assurance and training section. One Senior Construction Inspector and two Construction Inspector positions are needed to augment the inspection staff and to replace temporary employees. One entry level Engineering Aide I position is proposed to provide support to staff. .d Proiected Payroll Cost The full employment payroll estimate is $29.5 million, but we expect to realize a payroll savings of approximately 10% due to personnel turnover, delays in filling new positions, tight control over hiring activities, temporary adjustments in plant operation schedules and procedures to minimize staffing, and delays in major construction schedules. Our total payroll cost is therefore targeted at $26.3 million. r Page 6 Ir V - Net payroll and benefits, after chargeouts to CORP and the Districts, account for approximately 38% of the total budgeted Joint Operating Costs. L� - The actual payroll savings may be affected by pending classification studies and the meet-and-confer process this fall v when the current three-year Memoranda of Understanding expire, as there are no provisions in the budget for any changes that might be forthcoming. Any proposed changes will be considered by the full Board prior to implementation. 'r Joint Operating Budget - JO (See Green Report) u The $47.6 million Joint Operating budget finances the operating and maintenance costs of the joint treatment works and the joint v administrative activities. The major factors that are causing increases in our Joint Works L operating and maintenance costs include: �r - Regulatory Reguirements: More stringent air pollution control � I requirements mandated by the South Coast Air Quality Management r District (AQMD) for control and reduction of hydrogen sulfide (B2S) , oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and oxides of sulfur (SOx) emissions, resulting in higher operational costs to remove v pollutants from the digester gas produced in our treatment plants and control emissions from our digester gas fired engines. Increased costs for engineering, monitoring, enforcement, outside and in-house laboratory services and special project activities carried out by the Compliance, Laboratory and Source Control staffs to comply with the ocean monitoring and it pretreatment program provisions of our NPDBS permit as well as our AQMD permit requirements. r - Increased costa for use of higher volumes of chemicals such as ferric chloride and anionic polymer used in our physical/ chemical treatment systems to improve solids removal L efficiencies as required to maintain compliance with the discharge limits set forth in our NPDBS permit. - Sludge Disposal: The closure of the Coyote Canyon landfill with it no replacement for sludge disposal, as well as increased cost for hauling and disposal in a private landfill of waste activated sludge and grit and screenings which the Regional Water Quality :. Control Board has determined cannot be disposed of at a municipal landfill; and higher costs for private reuse alternatives to landfill disposal. V - Odor Control: Increased chemical usage for expanded odor control program including 20 new foul air scrubbers as well as Ij increases in the unit cost of caustic soda. rr Page 7 Repairs and Maintenance: Increased maintenance and repair activities throughout the Districts' expanded and upgraded treatment facilities. Comparison with 1989-90 Budget: The accompanying excerpt from Schedule A of the Joint Operating Budget (Green Report) highlights the comparisons between the proposed 1990-91 budget and last year's budget and also summarizes the reasons for the increases (and decreases) by major budget category. Increase Over 1989-90 Budget: The $3.1 million increase is 6.9% over the 1989-90 budget. Of this, 3.9% (or more than 56% of the d increase) is directly attributable to regulatory mandates such as improved wastewater treatment and AQMD regulations requiring significant improvements in control of air emissions, and increased costs for chemicals, as well as the ocean monitoring, pretreatment and toxics control requirements set forth in our NPDBS permit. The remaining portion of the increase, or about 3.0% (43% of the increase) is due to inflation related increases in the costs of operating and maintaining expanded facilities and to accommodate additional flows into our treatment facilities. Self-Funded Insurance Plans The Districts have been self insured for several types of coverage for the past several years as a result of Fiscal Policy Committee recommendations that were implemented by the Joint Boards of Directors. Workers' Compensation and Public Liability - The Workers' Compensation and Public Liability plans have been in existence since 1979. - The savings realized through these self insured plans plus a, in-lieu premiums deposited and interest earnings on the reserves in these funds have resulted in a current reserve level of $2.6 million, compared to the original $500,000 reserve level set by the Boards when the plans were established. The Committee recommends that the reserve level proposed for 1990-91 for the Workers' Compensation fund and the fully self-insured Public Liability Fund be maintained at .. the current levels. - An appropriation of $155,000 for in-lieu premium contributions by the Districts is recommended in the Workers' Compensation Fund to maintain the existing reserve level at $696,000. - A $265,000 appropriation has been included in the Public Liability Fund for excess loss insurance in the event the availability of this coverage makes it desirable to the Directors. r i , Page 8 4 1 ! Ir - The Fiscal Policy Committee is again recommending that the Boards of the individual Districts continue the practice of setting aside reserve funds to partially cover deductible it levels for the Districts' all-risk property insurance coverage. The reserves are recommended to be maintained at the $5 million level for 1990-91. 1 ' v Health Plan - The self-funded Employee Health Plan has also been in `+ existence since 1979. Our claims experience in 1989-90 appears to indicate that the cost containment provisions enacted in 1984, which include both increased deductible L requirements and co-payment levels, have been somewhat effective in helping to stabilize our claims levels on a per-employee basis. Although total costs have increased in response to continuing increases in the total numbers of v active employees, their dependents, and retired employees participating in the plan, the cost per employee covered has decreased. W - These increased total medical care costs required transfers 1 , into this fund during the past year over and above the y anticipated premiums. However, we have partially recovered some of these expenditures from increased premiums paid by , employees for family coverage. Staff expects that the increased Districts' and employees' contribution level authorized by the Boards during approval of the salary and benefits agreements negotiated with the employee groups in � I 1987-88 will also reduce any required transfers in 1990-91. W We expect these changes, and new cost containment provisions that are also included, will enable this fund to be more nearly self supporting by the end of the three year MOU period. {r Budgeted District premiums are equal to premiums approved for the HMO plans. 11 - During 1989-90 the Directors opted to purchase both short and long-term disability insurance and thus no budget has been allocated for these claims. Premiums are budgeted in the Joint Operating Fund. V CORP Budget (See Yellow Report) u The $103.4 million Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF) Budget finances the construction of the Joint Treatment Works Facilities. It includes major and minor projects which have generally been I ' previously presented to the Boards for review as part of the Master Plan and/or agenda process. Any project under $15,000 requires informal bidding. Projects over $15,000 require formal bidding, and any projects over $25,000 require Board approval in accordance with District procurement regulations. The budget is prepared under assumptions included in the 30-year Master Plan approved last July by the Directors. L 1C9800I8 A r' S/ID/90 1990-91 Or NSS OpHUTf00 PO® 9pL�2 SmOOQT IYffAASfOB/02PABBIOR w. 3(A®A9'ID ancmr xepOlA&Rprg s IAI IBI (C) (.) (B) (e) Im[. Dve Se Ins. Om 1'a Se[al M Jar Bmq.r 1169-90 90-91 Bud 2dtLtim/ Ro ul tm'9 Rec—dN -Joe Pm.m[ tar Rmaramoxtl eueaec Rma.p ed aneinn ..g.a..= ternevee/O........ 1. Or9 i... $17,697,000 919,266,000 $720,000 $619,000 $1.599,... arpeec lwel ep to gat of Wag ana ueeerired pe.lfima. SS tldltlmtl pw1 9.v.[ice clone vlll b pheetl Inta�wyr ran pee[p[l+e[ily ce uinucln/[sY1zacly1mc�ell�eA ramdvet�.er ga.litp maltari.q equspmnc e.d m.a.,. mjar a.d comtznecion pnlenm. 2. We[ Carrel 1 516611000 5,670,000 <17,000a <t7,000f Ioeeesae P 2./9ee.eu tar C4m1r+1 S,L�lg.l Sy6IDp041 [nexeene//Oxauei CagW 4 cele[Sm $270,000 A reel. le..l. d C rla Sod. <235,000> O.ed In foul LL (Se rn .camera am [rant eydtmfd.l 11ne. t.eo 1 pyd[egm ealflde aulldu,. es Pe[[v0. <25,00m Cmtra" a ldee CAlocide !. dige.u[ gm (A Rule 431.1). Purr— <16,000> .... el/eLmleel e, S21e[fd. t[eec..nt tm .pAspe.d primary a l.siflspmfinea.: Abe mad for .a1[Sd. ...I. ae Pelymrn 5 69,000 gee,.SmAnea.se tler Lxre.nee. «$11..00e 1. Prab..iea.l 119s0,000 3.194,000 350,000 984.000 1,366,000 • W. mncr.rt tar plmt pel.tlnq. r aad Con. • Ignrm..d gmmel antl l r legal .ervlce.. S.raiee. • Al[ mb.im. eeaeultmu. g. 5olid. R®vel 5.300,000 6,000,000 300.000 200,000 5001000 • Loa.. b dimo.a ... far private amal 01.p.al m./dbpe.al opu... e. ..la at inezesee0 yd m.ttlttime ead Coyece C.eyea eloeme. S. equlpmnt 200.000 26S,000 45,000 65,000 • Imre... in ... at am." gaipmnc. testy.. 6. 9ep.itn/ 3,765,000 31795,000 30,000 30,000 • 9ravld. far engaivq.elnt.ame.nod[ewi[e in ewne®.aael mwarded and vpgmded tall em.ode mrtzo: service./ eq.lpmnc. Suppllee 1. 9e..e[[A .nd 2,070,000 2,694,000 Ba,000 366.000 624,000 • Additiou.l mpite[inq required. manitorl.9 m B. urS tlm 7,220,000 6.345,000 <015,000> <91S,0001 • Cacup dm m of pat—, aperi.xa—,h nev .qulp .r. 9. ON.[ 2,602.000 2,916,000 100,000 376,000 376,000 • Iffioex to mp rt pbnned.utt ead ,ipmnt d R."li.. add .. fa At60 pemlci..W gretiaq fine. 10. Setel lain[ $46,501,000 $30,207,000 31,608,000 52.010,000 53.626.000 ap.[eting B an.e. 11. 9.v.nuae aad 21030,000 2,600,000 275.000 315.000 530,000 ofbac. . x.t a.iac S44,331,000 S61,601,000 $1.333,000 $1,143.000 53,016,0o0 0pe[ecing r r r Page 9 - Source of Funds: The budget will be financed from existing capital funds accumulated in the individual Districts, Capital Facilities Funds, proceeds from the 1986 sale of Certificates of Participation, new connection fees, limited Federal and State grant funds and from new borrowing to be approved by the Directors. - Master-Planned Projects: The 1990-91 COPY requirements total $103,422,000, an increase of $697,000 over 1989-90. The budget includes funds for several major master-planned projects, including completing the construction of the central - power generation facilities at both plants, additional primary treatment and sludge handling facilities at Plant 1, expansion of the administration building and the construction of a new central laboratory. r, - Project Categorization: Schedule B-2 entitled Classification of Budgeted Projects by Revenue Program Categories classifies all the proposed 1990-91 capital outlay projects into three categories to assist the Directors in evaluating the need for the proposed levels of expenditures. These categories are: - Replacement/Reconstruction Projects - These projects are v' required to replace or rehabilitate aging or deteriorated equipment or structures. m - Improvement/Upgrade Projects - These projects are mandated Sy various regulatory agencies, including the EPA, State Regional Water Quality Control Boards, South Coast Air Quality Management District, and other local agencies. - Additional Capacity/Increased Hydraulic Requirements Projects - These projects are required to accommodate increase hydraulic requirements (additional flows) that the Joint Works facilities must process and dispose of over the next five to ten years, as identified in the latest Joint .d Works Master Plan. The $103,422,000 in proposed CORP projects is allocated to these three categories as follows: Project Category 1990-91 Budget Allocation Replacement/Reconstruction $ 28, 801,000 Improvement/Upgrade 12, 367,000 Increased Hydraulic Requirements 62 ,254 , 000 Total 1990-91 CORF Budget Request $103,422, 000 The staff is available to answer any questions from the Directors. If you desire additional information before the meeting, please contact Wayne Sylvester or Gary Streed at (714 ) 962-2411. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS — 2�� o�toPalitan 0r'dolsT9 s � Since l9sk O�gNGE C0'0 1990-1991 FISCAL YEAR _ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 91 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA I C9a.ELLIE AVENUE M E M O R A N D U M A,C.SOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 927989127 171n969-9411 Date: May 23, 1990 To: Boards of Directors Subject: Proposed Personnel and Organizational Changes for Fiscal Year 1990-91 BACKGROUND During the annual budget preparation process the staff evaluates personnel requirements for the upcoming and future fiscal years. This review of staffing needs takes into consideration anticipated new or expanded programs, the start-up of new facilities and the ongoing maintenance and operation of the existing Joint Works Treatment Facilities and the individual District's collection systems. Staff recommendations for the 1990-91 fiscal year are contained in this report. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS The Committee has previously been advised that major treatment plant expansion underway and new programs being implemented to comply with changing regulatory requirements would require significant staffing increases to operate and maintain the facilities and to support related activities and other required programs. Over the past five years we have completed and placed into service $62.2 million of new plant facilities and equipment. We currently have $106.5 million in new treatment plant facilities under construction that will be completed and placed into service during the 1989-90 budget year; another $111.1 million in treatment plant facilities that will be completed during the next few years; and $24 .5 million in individual District facilities under construction. An additional $251.3 million in treatment facilities and $64.2 million in collection facilities are being designed and will be constructed and placed into service over the next several years. The 30 year Action Plan Master Plan adopted by the Boards last year projects capital improvements totalling $1.48 billion (in 1989 dollars) under current NPDES permit conditions. This year our various departments requested 72 new positions. The General Manager has reviewed those requests with the Department .- Heads and is recommending that the Fiscal Policy Committee authorize 55 new positions for 1990-91. Many of these positions will not be filled until later in the year, and some may not be WS014 Page 2 filled at all in 1990-91 if completion of construction projects is delayed. Two of the 55 positions are part-time, and four are to replace part-time positions being deleted. Summary of Proposed Additional Staffing Program/System Position r Management Board Secretary & Support 2 Personnel 1 Finance Accounting <1> Information Services 5 Operations and Maintenance Sewage Collection Systems 4 ` General Plant and Equipment Maintenance 11 Treatment Plant Operations/Training 8 _ Technical Services Regulatory Compliance (Air, Land, Water) 2 r Source Control Program 7 Process Monitoring and Laboratory 5 Engineering Facilities Planning and Design 5 Construction Management 6 Total 55 ti The proposed new positions would raise the authorized staffing level from 571 to 626, an increase of approximately 9.6%. ANNUAL COST Based upon the anticipated need to fill the proposed new positions over the course of the next year, the recommendations would add $1,960,630 or approximately 9.8%, to the estimated fiscal year 1990-91 salary budget. The total net salary cost of the proposed r organizational changes detailed in this report for both next year and future years, when all positions are eventually filled, is summarized on a departmental basis as follows: r GGG014 r Page 3 Net Salary Cost of Chances Department 1990-91 Future Maximum Management $101,928 $101,928 Finance 99,228 171,504 Operations & Maintenance 868,036 953,904 Technical Services 406,998 477,084 Engineering 484,440 484,440 Total $ 1,960,630 $ 2 , 188,860 Employee benefits paid by the Districts including retirement, health, life, disability, workers compensation and unemployment insurance and uniforms would add approximately 30% to the salary totals. OTHER PENDING ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES Reports on the following proposed organizational changes were submitted under separate cover because of the need to be considered prior to completion of the 1990-91 budget process, and were approved by the Joint Boards in April, 1990. Finance Department: The Directors recently decided to proceed with plans for securing a bond underwriter and counsel to assist in issuing securities for financing major portions of the Districts' new master-planned facilities expansion program. The Committee has recommended that staff be developed to provide ongoing support for this activity as the Districts will be in the financial market for a long time. Because of our imminent entry into the debt market, financial staff will have to be added as soon as possible, prior to the beginning of the 1990-91 budget year. Staff therefore submitted a separate report and recommendation to the Committee on organizational changes for the Finance Department that incorporate both the recommended changes needed to support expanding Districts' operation and the debt market activity as well. Engineering/Scientific Intern Program: Staff also submitted a separate report proposing implementation of an Engineering/ Scientific Intern Program to enable the hiring of college students part-time to help on specific projects and to serve .+ as a basis for helping to recruit future engineers and scientists to work full-time for the Districts. Staff recommended that this program be considered as soon as possible so that recruitment could begin before the current college term ended. GGSM4 Page 4 The above proposals are reflected in the authorized personnel numbers and organizational charts in this report. ' DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED STAFFING INCREASES r The following discussion provides a summary explanation of the proposed changes for 1990-91, the salary cost of which is detailed r by organizational unit in Exhibit A, and by position classification in Exhibit B. Revised organizational charts reflecting the proposed changes are also included. _ MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT b The Management Department includes the General Manager's Office, the Board Secretary's Office, the Public Information Office, the Management Support Office and the Personnel and Safety/Security Office. 22 full-time and 12 part-time positions are currently authorized in this department. 2160 - Board Secretary's Office ' One Secretary ($2057-$2558) position is proposed to provide additional clerical support to the Board Secretary and to the r General Manager on matters pertaining to the Boards of Directors' activities and official Districts' records. 2170 - Management Sunnort The transfer of an Office Aide ($1806-$2246) from the Accounting division is proposed to place all Office Aides in ' the same organizational unit. These positions are responsible for the mailroom, reproduction work and other miscellaneous office related tasks. +� 2180 - Personnel and Safety/Security Office One Personnel Analyst ($2838-$3690) is proposed for this division to provide the additional office support needed on employee matters for the expanding work force. FINANCE DEPARTMENT r The Finance and Administration Department includes the Director of Finance's office, the Accounting Division, the Purchasing and Warehouse Division and the Information Services Division. 52 Is positions are currently authorized in this department. r GGS014 r Page 5 2210 - Director of Finance's Office Changes were proposed in a separate report regarding staffing required for debt marketing and expanding operations. 2220 - Accounting One Office Aide ($1806-$2246) position is recommended to be transferred to the Management Support Division to place all Office Aides in the same organizational unit. 2230 - Purchasing and Warehouse No changes are currently proposed in this division. 2240 - Information Services This division was added in the 1988-89 budget to coordinate, implement and maximize the utilization of computerization in all departments. The division has been effective in reducing our reliance on consultants and is in constant demand for both hardware and software problem solving and for implementing management information systems. As their support efforts and capabilities become known and the installed computer base grows, the Information Services Division's functions continue to evolve and to expand. Three Programmer ($2743-$3411) positions are proposed to provide support for the evaluation, selection and implementation of a maintenance management system; to support the growing local area network in Technical Services; to assist in the design and implementation of new computerized treatment plant process monitoring and control systems to be installed at Plant No. 1 as a part of J-23-2; and to assist the growing number of computer users. One additional Information Services Technician III ($2743- $3411) position is requested to provide additional hardware support services and for installation and implementation of future mini-computer based systems for maintenance management and process monitoring. A new series of classifications is proposed in the graphics and desktop publishing area to provide additional needed support to all departments and to improve our communications ability and to separate the secretarial work load from the <� service function. One Sr. Graphics Technician ($2327-$2894) position is proposed for budgeting purposes. GGSG14 Page 6 .r OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT The Operations and Maintenance Department is responsible for the day-to-day ongoing operations and maintenance of the Joint Works V Treatment Facilities and the individual District's collection system. There are 335 authorized positions in the department which consists of the following seven divisions: y 3310 - General Superintendent's Office I � This office is charged with the management and evaluation of the maintenance and operation functions to ensure efficiency and ability to meet operational requirements and with other special projects to maintain the ongoing functionality of the ko facilities and the processes. Since December, when the position was approved, we have been yw actively seeking qualified candidates for the position of Emergency Preparedness Coordinator ($3682-$4787) . This position consolidates the responsibilities currently split among several staff members, and establishes the position responsible for carrying out the Disaster Preparedness Plan approved as a part of "2020 VISION". Because we have not been successful in recruiting any qualified applicants with an engineering degree, registration and suitable experience, staff is proposing to increase the salary range to the equivalent of a Senior Engineer ($4106-$5337 ) to provide more flexibility in our recruitment effort. An additional Engineer ($3682-$4787) with experience in electrical power generation and distribution is proposed. This position will add the needed expertise to maintain the new Central Power Generation Facilities and other U sophisticated electrical systems. U The deletion of an existing Engineering Aide I ($2043-$2541) and the addition of an Engineering Aide II ($2264-$2816) is ■ proposed to reclassify a current employee whose duties have expanded to include the monthly and annual departmental reports and the collection, monitoring, organization and y presentation of plant process data as well as other special requirements. An additional Senior Clerk ($1806-$2246 ) position is proposed r to provide support for the training section of the Plant Operations Division and their increased needs resulting from the completion of the Master Plan, the numerous new facilities L11 and to support the Emergency Preparedness Engineer. r. u GGS014 Page 7 3330 - Plant Maintenance The Plant Maintenance Division is responsible for digester cleaning, grounds maintenance, painting, plumbing, carpentry, janitorial services and general labor assignments throughout the plants as well as off-site sludge hauling and disposal. 57 positions are currently authorized for this division. Two Maintenance Field Supervisors ($3289-$4275) are proposed to replace one Senior Foreman ($2867-$3728) position which will be deleted. This will enable assignment of a middle manager at each plant to provide the necessary supervision in this division and to coordinate the efforts of the several foremen and allow them to devote more time to directing their leadmen and workers. Two of the existing six Equipment Operator ($2399-$2987) positions are proposed to be deleted because of increasing use of private contractors in our off-site sludge management and beneficial reuse program. 3340 - Collection Facilities Division 3340 is responsible for maintenance of the Districts' 800 miles of trunkline sewers, 32 pump stations, 3 in-plant side stream pump stations and the trunk sewer caustic soda injection program for odor control. There are 27 authorized positions in this division. Two Collection Facilities Field Supervisor ($3289-$4275) positions are proposed: one for the trunk sewer maintenance group and one for the pump station maintenance group. These positions would perform the day-to-day management of the two groups which will allow the leadmen and foremen to spend their time directly supervising the field crews and will allow the Facilities Manager to concentrate on collection system management planning and problem solving matters. The existing two Collection Facilities Supervisor ($2867- $3728) positions are proposed to be reclassified to Foreman ($2716-$3530) positions as a result of the above change in the organizational and management structure. One each Senior Collection Facilities Worker ($2225-$2770) and Collection Facilities Worker II ($1926-$2399) positions are proposed to round out existing and new crews to enable us to maintain our routine schedule of cleaning and maintaining sewers and pump stations and to enhance the safety of our crews working in increasingly busy streets. GGS014 r Page 8 i , 3350 - Mechanical Maintenance y The Mechanical Maintenance Division includes 62 authorized J ' positions. This division is responsible for maintaining a V wide variety of mechanical equipment throughout the two treatment plants, including stationary engines, pumps, hydraulic systems and belt filter presses as well as the yd vehicle fleet and the portable/emergency equipment. Work loads are expected to increase dramatically for this division as a result of the recent completion of major facilities such as the new $35 million Plant No. 1 Headworks and the $27 million Ocean Outfall Booster Station at Plant No. 2 and the $ 20 million odor control facilities. Four r. Senior Mechanic ($2415-$3007) , one Equipment Operator ($2399- $2987 ) and two Mechanic ($2063-$2569 ) positions are proposed to enable staff to maintain the current preventive maintenance -W program for keeping breakdowns to a minimum and to respond promptly when repairs are needed to keep the plant equipment operating. u 3360 - Electrical Maintenance i The Electrical Maintenance Division is responsible for all 4+ electrical equipment including motors, switch gear, lights, pumps, substations and cabling within the plants and at the pump stations. 26 positions are authorized within the - L division. One Lead Electrical Technician ($2906-$3618 ) position is proposed to replace an Electrical Technician I ($2334-$2906) position which is proposed for deletion. This change will give the division better work force control and safer working ` conditions in environmental control systems and other 1r electrical maintenance. 3370 - Instrumentation Maintenance „r Division 3370, which has 24 authorized positions, is responsible for the installation, maintenance and repair of thousands of meters, controls, programmable logic ` controllers, transmitters and other instrumentation throughout the plants and at the 32 pump stations. These components provide vital information for monitoring plant �+ processes to help ensure that they are operating properly and that the Districts comply with our ocean discharge and air quality emissions requirements. All of the new facilities under construction, as well as those recently completed, have extensive programmable logic ' controllers and other sophisticated instruments. As the projects are completed the essential preventive maintenance I Lr GGsmc L Page 9 and repair work becomes the responsibility of the Instrumentation Division. In order for staffing to keep pace with the expanding responsibilities, one Instrument Technician II ($2751-$3425) , one Instrument Technician I ($2334-$2906) and one Instrument Maintenance Man ($2120-$2640) are proposed. 3380 - Plant Operations The 118 authorized positions in the Plant Operations Division are responsible for operating the sewage treatment and disposal processes at both plants and for meeting the Districts' NPDES ocean discharge permit requirements. These responsibilities require staffing at the plants 24 hours per day, seven days per week. Approximately 75% of the time this is the only division with staff on site. One Shift Supervisor ($3079-$4004 ) position is proposed to provide additional process control supervision, to oversee the ongoing operational requirements and to assist with regulatory compliance. A Senior Plant Operator ($2658-$3310) position is recommended to serve as the coordinator at Plant No. 1 between the six major construction project contractors and the ongoing sewage treatment process requirements. Nine Plant Operator ($2318-$2886) positions are proposed to increase the sludge dewatering staffing during the a.m. and p.m. shifts, to allow a trained operator to remain in the Control Center to monitor operational activities at all times and to expand the in-house training and retraining program. One full-time Control Center Clerk ($1811-$2255) position is proposed to replace four part-time Control Center Clerk ($8.53/hr max) positions because of the difficulty to hire, -' train and retain qualified part-time help. TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT The Technical Services Department is responsible for the Districts' _ industrial toxics source control program; the recently established conservation, reclamation and reuse program; testing and analysis of samples to monitor treatment plant processes and industrial discharges; compliance with environmental standards; administration of the $2 million per year ocean monitoring program; and the Districts' liaison efforts on a wide variety of air, land and water laws and regulations which govern our operations. There .. are currently 91 authorized positions in five divisions. 6GS014 Page 10 3510 - Director of Technical Services' Office r Air quality laws and regulations are changing rapidly at the federal, state and regional level. Passage of the federal r Clean Air Act is expected during 1990, and the California State Legislature and the California Air Resources Board are bringing new air quality requirements on a statewide basis. On the basis of the South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD) air quality management plan and other considerations, the SCAQMD is enacting increasingly stringent permit requirements on the Districts. All of these developing issues are creating an increasing demand for Districts' staff time for responses and for coordination of our efforts. These issues have been managed by various Districts' personnel working in the Technical Services, Engineering and Operations and Maintenance Departments. Our ability to maintain agency- wide coordination and effective responsiveness in this r rapidly changing and growing regulatory arena is being . challenged. For this reason, staff is recommending the creation of a new r position, Air Quality Manager ($4106-$5337) , who will have the responsibility of maintaining day-to-day supervisory oversight of these activities, as well as providing focused .. response to emerging federal, state and regional laws and regulations. This position will provide the leadership necessary for the Districts to achieve compliance with all applicable air regulations, consistent with our 30-year Master Plan, "2020 VISION", which establishes consistent compliance with all environmental regulations as one of its key objectives. 3520 - Compliance The Compliance Division consists of 13 full-time staff and utilizes several consultants in their quality assurance/ quality control section, the marine monitoring/marine science section and the air quality section. The addition of one Senior Clerk ($1806-$2246) position is proposed to provide clerical support for this report intensive r division, to free the technical and professional staff to perform their other duties and to provide support for the Division's existing Secretary. r 3530 - Conservation Reclamation and Reuse Division r No changes are currently recommended. GGS014 Page 11 3580 - Laboratory The Laboratory Division performs analysis of samples from the various industrial waste permittees, from the treatment plant processes and from the ocean monitoring program to determine compliance with regulatory requirements and the effectiveness of plant operations, and to determine our effects on public health and the environment. There are 33 positions authorized in this division. Four Lab Analyst ($2280-$2835) positions are recommended to free four upper-level positions which have been bumped down to solve immediate staffing requirements caused by increasing work load demands at the technician level and to provide additional staff for sample analysis from the stepped-up sampling program by the Source Control Division anticipated for the next fiscal year. One Clerk ($1618-$2013) position is proposed to provide additional clerical and data entry support for this division and to allow the Lab Helper currently performing these clerical duties to be better utilized in the laboratory. 3590 - Source Control The 34 position Source Control Division is the front line of the Districts' program to control toxic discharges to the sewerage system to protect our environment and to ensure our ability to comply with NPDES permit effluent requirements. An additional Associate Engineer ($3233-$4203) position is proposed for the Special Projects Section to provide improved liaison and contract administration with special dischargers such as SAWPA and the IRWD, to ensure compatibility and completeness of our pretreatment programs and federal and state mandates and to help identify and quantify sources of influent toxics. An Assistant Engineer ($2725-$3544) position is proposed to work in the Permits Section to implement the recently revised Regulations For Use of Districts' Facilities (the industrial waste ordinance) and to implement recommendations from the EPA for improving our source control program. In order to have position titles which more properly reflect the type of work being done and which are more closely identified with the Division and its work mission, and to create uniformity in the job titles, staff is proposing the following changes: GGS014 Page 12 From TO Lead Industrial Waste Inspector Lead Source Control Inspector Industrial Waste Inspector II Source Control Inspector II Industrial Waste Inspector I Source Control Inspector I Industrial Waste Assistant Source Control Assistant The inspection and monitoring staff is proposed to be increased by one each Source Control Inspector II ($2458- $3057) and Source Control Inspector I ($2188-$2721) positions. These Inspectors are needed to monitor SAWPA and its member agencies in the implementation, and coordination of their pretreatment programs (costs are billed to SAWPA) and to provide additional staff for routine and special downstream enforcement sampling, inspection and monitoring of Districts' permittees. A Senior Clerk ($1806-$2246) and two part-time Assistant ($8.80/hr. max) positions are proposed to provide additional clerical support and data entry and to collect water use, property tax and sampling data to ensure proper allocation of costs to permittees through the user fee process. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT The three divisions of the Engineering Department include 59 authorized positions. Additionally, nine temporary construction inspectors (who receive no benefits) are currently employed and 8 consultants are utilized to assist in construction management activities through professional services contracts. The department is responsible for planning and managing the Districts' facilities expansion and improvement projects. The recommended new facilities in the recently adopted "2020 VISION" Master Plan total $1.48 billion over the next 30 years in 1989 dollars. In order to help administer this extensive treatment plant and trunk "ewer construction program, staff is recommending the addition of 11 positions in this department. Several of these additions are the continuation of the long-term process approved by the Directors last year which will enable us to enhance our in-house capabilities and to phase out the need for on-site construction management consultants. This will result in considerable cost savings for administering our capital facilities programs in the future. 3710 - Director of Encineering's Office No changes are currently recommended. GGS014 .. Page 13 3720 - Planning and Design Management Virtually all of our treatment plant and sewer design is done by consulting engineers. However, an Engineer ($3682-$4787) position with experience in electrical and instrumentation processes is proposed to coordinate and review the increasingly complex design and plans in this discipline. An additional Associate Engineer ($3233-$4203) is also proposed in the Treatment Plant Section to assist an incumbent engineer who is currently administering 19 projects. This position is responsible for monitoring current design projects and the performance of consultants, writing the scope of work for new projects, reviewing specifications and drawings and coordinating construction documents for bidding. A Senior Engineering Aide ($2800-$3482) position is recommended to begin work on complete computerized (CADD) composite drawings of the existing facilities for future use in design and construction and for emergency response needs. One each Engineering Aide II ($2264-$2816) and Engineering Aide I ($2043-$2541) positions are proposed to prepare drawings and exhibits, to gather data and to perform calculations, to maintain logs, spreadsheets and to assist other professional staff as required as a result of the increasing number of projects being planned and designed. 3790 - Construction Management An additional Engineer ($3682-$4787) position is proposed to provide ongoing project management services now provided by an outside consultant. A new independent quality assurance section is proposed to be headed up by a new Principal Engineering Associate ($3418- $4443) . This section will report directly to the Construction Manager and will be responsible for training within the division, satisfying AQMD and other permit requirements and general quality assurance within the construction management process. One Senior Construction Inspector ($3061-$3806) and two Construction Inspector ($2800-$3482) positions are proposed to augment the inspection staff and to replace temporary part- time employees. One entry level Engineering Aide I ($2043-$2541) position is proposed to provide support to staff in maintaining and monitoring planning, design and construction schedules, collecting data and documentation and performing various other support activities including computer input. 665074 3/16/90 DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY EXHIBIT A PROPOSED 1990-91 PERSONNEL CHANGES A B C D E F Currentl" Proposed Revised Annual Dept Authorized New Toral Max Cost No. Department/ Division Positions Positions Positions (savings) 1 2150 GENERAL MANAGER 2 2 2 2160 Board Secretary 2 1 3 30,696 r 3 2170 Management Support 6 1 7 26.952 4 I 2180 Personnel 24 1 25 44.280 5 34 37 101.928 6 r 7 2210 DIRECTOR OF FINANCE 3 8 2220 Accounting 20 (1) 19 (26,952) 9 2230 Purchasing & Warehouse 17 17 r10 2240 Information systems 12 5 17 198.456 11 52 4 56 171.504 12 I m13 : 3310 GENERAL SUPERINTENDENT 21 2 23 94,296 141 3330 Plant Maintenance 57 (1) 56 (13,824) 15 ' 3340 Collection Facilities 27 4 31 159.876 —16i 3350 Mechanical Maintenance 62 7 69 241.336 17 , 3360 Electrical Maintenance 26 26 8,544 IS ! 3370 Instrumentation 24 3 27 107.652 —191 3380 Plant Operations 118 8 126 335,524 201 335 23 358 953,904 211 .221 3510 DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES 7 1 8 64,044 23 , 3520 Compliance 13 1 14 26.952 24 ! 3530 Conservation. Recl & Reuse 4 4 .25 3580 Laboratory 33 5 38 160.236 261 3390 Source Control 34 7 41 225.852 27 ! 91 14 103 477,084 28 291 3710 DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING 9 9 30 3720 Planning & Design 20 5 25 213.948 _31I 3790 Construction Management 30 6 36 270,492 321 59 11 70 484.440 33 34 TOTAL 571 55 626 2, 188.860 r PERS9IA.XLS 9:09 AM 3/29/90 PROPOSED PERSONNEL CHANGES 11HIBIT 8 BY POSITION CLASSIFICATION 1990.91 A B C D E P G Total Changing Changing Step 5 Marcum Current Current Proposed Proposed Monthly Annual No. Classification Rath Aath Add Delete Auth Rate Cost leavings) 1 2150 General Manager's Office 2 2 2160 Board secretary 2 3 Secretary t 21558 30,696 4 2170 Management Support 6 - 5 Office Aide 1 1 2 2,246 26,952 r 6 2180 Personnel 29 7 Personnel Analyst 1 1 2 3,690 WHO 8 2210 Director of Finance's Office 3 .r 9 2220 Accounting 6 Revenue 20 10 Office Aide 1 1 2,246 (26,952) 11 2230 Purchasing/Warehousiag 17 " 12 2240 Information Services 12 13 Programmer 2 3 5 31411 122.796 14 Info Services Tech III 2 1 3 31111 40,93E 15 Sr Graphics Tech 1 1 21891 341128 16 Graphics Tech 21559 17 3310 General Superintendent's Office 21 18 Emergency Preparedness Coordinator 1 1 5,337 64.044 ` 19 Emergency Preparedness coordinator 1 1 1,787 157,4441 20 Engineer 3 l 4 4,767 57,444 21 Engineer Aide lI 1 1 2,816 33,752 22 Engineer Aide I 2 1 t 2,541 130,4921 23 5r Clerk 2 1 3 2,246 26.952 24 1330 Plant Maintenance 57 25 Mtce Field Supervisor 2 2 4,275 102.600 26 Sr Foreman I 1 31728 144,7361 27 Equipment Operator 6 2 4 2,987 (71,681) .. 28 3340 Collection Facilities 27 29 Collection Pan Field Supvr 2 2 4,275 102,600 30 Collection Facilities Supervisor 2 2 3,728 189,4721 31 Foreman 2 2 3,530 84,120 32 Sr Collection Pic Worker 3 1 4 2,770 33,240 33 Collection Pic Worker tI 10 1 11 2,399 28,188 r 34 3350 Mechanical Maintenance 62 35 Sr Mechanic 19 4 23 3,007 144,336 36 mechanic 20 2 22 20569 61,656 37 Equipment Operator 1 1 2 2,907 35,844 38 3360 Electrical Maintenance 26 39 Lead Electrical Tech 3 l 4 3,618 43,416 10 Electrical Tech I 6 1 5 21906 (31,072) r PIES9IB.ILS 5:30 PM 3/29/90 PROPOSHD P39SOBNBL CHANGES 31HIBIT 3 BY POSITION CLASSIFICATION 1990.91 A B C 0 E P G Total Changing changing Step 5 Nardmum Current Current Proposed Proposed Monthl➢ Ann0al No. Classification Apth Auth Add Delete Total Rate Cast ISavin s 11 3370 Instrumentation 24 42 Instrument Tech II 8 1 9 3,425 41,100 43 Instrument Tech I 5 1 6 2,906 34,872 44 Instrument Mtce Nan 2 1 3 2,640 31,680 45 3380 Plant Operations 118 46 Shift Supervisor 16 1 17 4,004 18,04E 47 Sr Plant Operator 27 1 26 3,310 39,720 48 Plant Operator 39 9 48 2,886 311,68E 49 control Center clerk 8 1 3 21255 27,060 5D Part-time Control Ctr Clerk 4 4 1,479 (70,592) 51 3510 Director of Tech Services' Office 7 52 Air quality Manager 1 1 5,337 64,044 53 3520 Compliance 13 54 Sr Clerk 1 1 2,246 26,952 55 3530 Conservation,Eeclamation 6 Reuse 4 56 3580 Laboratory 33 57 Lab Analyst 9 4 13 2,835 136,080 58 Clerk 1 1 21013 21,156 59 3590 Source Control 34 60 Associate Engineer 3 1 4 1,203 50,436 61 Assistant Engineer 3 1 4 3,544 42,528 62 Inspector II 9 1 10 3,057 36,684 - 63 Inspector I 4 1 5 2,721 32,552 54 Sr Clerk 4 1 5 2,246 26.952 65 Part-time Assistant 2 2 1,525 36,600 66 3710 Director of Eogineering's Office 9 67 3720 Planning A Design 20 68 Engineer 4 1 5 1,787 57,444 69 Associate Engineer 2 1 3 41203 50,43fi 70 BY Engineering Aide 1 1 2 31482 41,784 71 Engineering Aide II 1 1 2 2,816 33,79E 72 Engineering Aide I I 1 1 2,541 30,49E 73 3790 Construction Management 30 74 Engineer 5 1 6 1,787 57,444 _ 75 Principal Eogr Associate 1 1 1,443 53,315 76 Sr Construction Inspector 5 1 6 3,806 45,672 77 Constructioa Inspector 9 2 11 3,182 83,568 if Engineering Aide I 1 1 2,541 30,492 80 TOTAL 571 68 t3 2,180,860 PEB891B.PLS 5:34 PH t t a t a a t t a t t a a t a t t t t m omme mmmr orou mrvrm memo a muY ______________ _________________ Am am mPmm omo vm®.ana my mm rum®. om emoA emA nvo m mlm Yrm rumo�yrnmr. mlo An m m m m mr PIQ f urRl ruvmm mvu mrm uum �u m rm Pmmm mva�ro mm roue uvrnm r Aalmv o�m mAm ®m Y 3A Im A mnm A � Ivaiu a ovum rvma movmrar �rmmrY o mnm mmom aalm rmn v r,7 —r mmm amm. omv mouun vmA m=r o o°�® o® vn' m® lorinn m® m ao mmm mmm Ammmm voroormor omnm ammo vrm rovrtm PAYm u nry Imwm --uo rmr m me om vm mrow mmr.FAao., uormn r m� coma m mlm mY'➢ 60 a rm m 1 m IV A IOn mCLrO m®rY��� mlmA 01At IOY9 mim mmYA m m Im)mld6 mrNYq M1R mPm YNmYt mr1351m qA6 IaD-IW1 dXW W PIN 33 6mAd aam L X E W14D 5[a'S aPPIa IgYWpP.1I$aPM} P3AWML MPIR J auA a um erP�d od 1 1 SBE SBE y MOCK..Wm N3 mam SOl@ QVm PIXSmWtt. d3[i SPOT L B]1PY 8L[4 dPWO apg14 I S m SR PR)P[W MST I aNpd X>H � I Y�1 SmPST SNPAMT 0 1 SIMI36i1 PWWWRI WIL 3 M911 YO M9] � y WO MOO 5[CP 1 L ulna 3saT 3 ]m3 MIS � l Ns2 y m Ap $-f- 9WEM IaSS ES IOSS 3Va reel awim=K L IAII ]OI X $P Sa 4VIPD sma5 am: I IF aPrla 3Ia 1 SEAM".o. eaic CLIPS t ] IDND Zbs 1 I Ia56P an 1rtN II16 IOYP ?N6 a31¢ a3u y 0 0 IOSIP IDll IMIP ID13 vT sd RAM L Imn a lumm I IQ01300M 9AMUL am= wmMm L 14� SSE P3WP)�P!NS6 sPE PYi� MmS6 S6 P3W fIS1L f0 P106 6 � L L _ T lag l991 WEMMM S MWO MW MUT N P1M S >SB SPA£RN. SWMWRIDIXI 1 Ma m m vo es9v suer Wu Ab'!suee mra 1 1 seas sea m rAW ITS 0 sAle lm evert Wu 6 l 11 X 31 69 26 n PIdM 1 P=2 TIIN➢q 6PAIUL Mua 4 wm PLAM MM91NR WLLPCRtlI MC lu NPaW m PJPCI m DISML091I tMV WV TIlMN6 1tl01 P/1 M PIQ PILL PSd PM1 PAW WWTN OPFMTM SVYM SPC4 prtM4 [IpS IGA N4S IIM NO MP at PAU a PM DRAIL SLA PMA M PW MM 56fi PM6 K S M PW WiAIL �YY amnas a YYrmuY meanme Y®� aYruc YID m ISO In na ewr Yee nY me mH mn 1 1 YH ms �y Y raz.m 0 na m emYlu�Q memucmrs Ynu sa 6 l 11 UJaI(Y YI® 148 mM1@ SYIY�YYi Ym PmY CWIO 1 1 M Sll) Sni cu fAL� ue nY PY m�1QQ. YRi\R 1 1 as Wl Q% d YYIOW HII W NI 516miP IMY H11 W I IIXW H16 m PR 1EYL 1059 511 90QM O6[ W 1 1056P ZN6 W dY[ i 1051[ IDU re MIS. >y m¢a�mmm sn ao a iar soR oev }w sor ea 1 1 s� sm 9MY 0 r s¢¢¢ni®plg6 I¢A..N�6 13 I I nlYs¢¢sfio6 y T PJQ 1 >IM} }n® I Issl am ov¢nn a�ovno vA S. r r NUT son amt soA} }um�sra s 9 1 i IViI 191 JM r L ¢wv o¢ a wr}oeo pvm vm n¢ a w n¢ 3rt10 11 ll10 E6N 1S v10 �¢ s 3110 Ma } UW j I r I ' Id wr oluso eusr nsvao .var¢vvv 6 A 249 >b5 M9 lof M9 $9S I Yel "am rev v>oe i . 6 >o� ms >my aee Ise1 1 mtn zs msio zss iw L eii 4}aa¢ 0 v v. PM a r aPFYRWO i 101MIflWR 0@14110R PM IC ]u arrmu. BUP®m®m t r iep m m ma r uit mx MO saR sore m¢ ] an]aPe/Baeerer ] ]ea ua r ®vere w ere omn m PmB a rre oWia u ss BB m n r PUW omooin ara eic oa our mo - r1Q. IQ®a® m PM16 N Iq Y@Idd 1 19re r =m BOW ] r 1]1B MPNB 2 FM PO 2 r t )5la ]Sla am r tBeO BOIm tm 3 IAO 2 1 mare ssW miss ssu mb00 ssBB W [�OPWfiY mBW rm m4 1 r m59e Pm6 r ea lees wBm vaBrm O 6 mB1C mla mSIC mm r r Illl'B 10 la mu] aBB r aeamma®a ] mslr me r y W o B mm tn PR P eW iBa® vR aaaore 6.0a/M. r PI BBpm Bmtl r tj Ps�b.4-mt eewvm m ewi Worlmd peBrol aaae.mB• r aeunta tivasvx¢omPPamr pR• ]b u 4tl6LL 12I� I 1 6qe LIn v nr tm sort mn �svrt ma 1 Da[ I sea sea e¢e1Q U N f696 96 PY3 U em[Q1¢ � � x v u x n J Pure ioawra owtaa nmtrm ownru ¢[twos, nenomesrN ev e106 K RA Y91L na WLL'IY left IOWY rP6 FW6Y rP6 IOFtm' L 1 1 1 1 Um im tPm tPm a non emr ma rl¢a me ¢nt rmn smv mir n=smr L( ] ] e am ors t(v txss nrc( room nsn ]aoor � a l API wx tPPP L.S uPo osn(sa ¢aP ss¢o fem D6L t xu Mx 1 xle Pr o¢oe awr vv an i e r aea xa vme xa no as u Mu ma NOmiR aW 1193 L �6 w SW ]ea I i a u c imnn r a asm YN Me( ]IN PrPa oeeaM I Met ae] L YYT f(q I PSA 1m I e Mrs no vsm as m ar uses t ((m out mtt w >(xo mow L vs(c ato Mx xto avow a u r569 aH av n u mnmw rmmor DesC D93 0 S5f1 o L I xSSP D,P 7011 L W I Ra1162C( MYO MA1 I]N DM9l ITA EM90 Im J 1990-1991 38ODQCRL SERVICES PM 9 105 DIAECNB DP 7ECE SERVIC83 I 6828 2 l 4 CI.ERICEL 3IR pU3LP1V IAI8XIL4 3DR SEC MMY GU3L MW 1 5337 18EID 2914 . P/Y ]NR886 4 16.00/Rr XeA. S68I0R CLEAT! 1 1p56P 2246 CLERE p 1p54P 2p13 14 4 38 41 C01@L3ENCE MERV., EECLAN., LR88R81DRV 6pU6CB 00hi 8. w P8p58 CL9@L3ERC8 84A4G91 Cp®88A RECW m LRB XRRNiBR SW BCE CDRRBL m 1 REDSE Itl@RSA830B 1 1 SB59 1 5592 5559 5337 SE8 PM 58 MR DETR11. SE6 P3p8 SB P8R ULR3II. SEE PAGE SC m D8 m isu PUR SD PDR DBTEIL i seawlaE A®n= Euu 9 la o nca or L w seams 1 Y a 1 4 a®oiv., Aeau., u YBGBe1Gn am Ewa a.nlcu,/sseae svoe¢oJ1004 8e1 Pae SC fa G@I1I6 =PAGE m Pa ones Se6 Pete s Pa GCEIIL see PAa m PGA G I mscwln � 14 AU@LIAYC61aNOLR 1 54N amm G e mvuea¢saevE wo!cxexa soma exene® r OW ms 4m II eEe orvn sec esmc m Li G x amA aw �r s svxe sec s esn sec las rza taw zrros r.l eEvm sec n rnv sec a exvw sec n rl 1 Ia3G D19 1G 1319 ]O6]0 1119 V Perm sex x lax GaP I t L lave zsse ' soda¢s[ y lase zms y aes a 1a9e mu L YAI l [ fl [ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I zAGE TECHNICAL SERVICES eR � 105 DIRIDOM OF TECH SERVICES 6878 14 AB 7 41 CC@LTANCE LABORATORY MMCA4/SDPNU SOERCE Cog= SEE PAN SA FOR DETAIL M PAGE SC FOR DETAIL ISM PAGE SD FOR DSPAIL CONSBRV. REC.AN., AND RROSR 9 OONSERV, RCCJN AND REM IDKDII EATOR 1 5377 PEN 4lYIR SPEC 2 42DI SeCERARY I I059A 2558 �m 4m M mnm 4PY x 1x r alum a 44a3 ffinm L I 4m 14 6 LL NBYY..WL. U]@LiIO'6 1m tW d4ltly/501PM 04 P141 56 Po9 OR6Il ffi tl�9!Do P6116 ffi PM S Rl OtM. 6[6 PI09'0 FYI M1TI11 Yg6M r H W]PllII4 xYl® 1 ; a suz r z 10 v s V WH IOQ 6 P6YId f61m®4 Q7BL' BfEW.G6Lfi4H IaC1010VA4/41AYC9! r w0Yf4R 5049 GBA61flI 34PW Id00P61p1 NM t t t mz mz am 1f1[w W. F1Y w IYL MO w W. WY w fipl, r aws nsx ms 6S6 ii w src .Y6 arc lax afizo iae sm 1ax zao Swm aww. mwFLL mww. z tRYs y19 IOxO ]tl9 106?l yx la6Y yl9 L IWI A15 IWI ffiS ]ffil A]5 V y 59[HM1TY4 1 ]059! IIY r w f4W[m0 a TOSS N09 y vw t IxIP IDl] 0 Y Prt 6sz64etr 6 r ]mmm mnm P,W m r 1W menu a fn mnm r m 19 9 P v mcWP.,Pmae., me]1]oW mPmss mc]m4WPPm tmnWP r mP.ffi 9lra mOlL ffiF]659 PW mSl6 mPlOSlW!®Il mPW YFm mlLL 91 R@3 WPIPrt.B 1 r 5g9 5 ll l r mW1S9! P@� 9LOl4 MRm ®l® 1 9i� r !4$LE® 6iV'IP. f6 L v®® lSVlmi[iY.® I 1 ] �d 1A1 4F] 9TO A@3 0➢R&SP2 r 91W W N1 f4T Y� r 1m5TYP® �4ISOR 0® SSN 1511 mscm 1060 %11 SC1@n N r Il•A ]bl SCI@1 r ] IOYO PlIl r AAL9v 1 1091 1S9 m W IGFi OJE 1 IOS9 N19 r SmW Off[ S IVN lM6 f C 69T r IK0 196 P/i$551548I e.m/er. r 1>]YIe91 wemua meAmrt mee i m euuclw n V 6aipw 1 fei 6aIfY aI® PIliw i®a taifa[Tln mj len w®IOO sa Pp a In Ua¢ NY® 1 YB PJa1 ml.aa® taOLillfe R[GLL etll ' LY A I1® san ] ] am im L name w P]�A w oeOcnll.w aeeaom mclm eeeamn 1 l 1 aw aw aw Yr ]wc m am a wam avoona mm l aan V wnmv I I uaua L.I la]wa® 1 a 110 m 1 low liE a w m 1 J511 1 lan ]ea law xn v mmm Illlmm 1 1 lam Yea lam lan Ile1 IOI Amen Iola Ela Ottmn IYimn y IVd E16 IaIN MU P/]IMF efa]M 16.a1/k IY. Ia9M me ®mI wYml IDS9 EU IM3 'yl I leer 9wA 60 1 IOS61 IIA V etw 1 IaSn AU ' feel r/a mr e.eo/tr. aveanaar m a ro � ovnaa u ®m 1 ra e E X OAIOL/IRP.H PIJ®f ma tffilR)I®eaT r ffi Pla 6 R Y6i1Il ffi PA9t 6 p and LRIDaID Ip� t Xa II 6 1 3 9 suer e] ml.aays ]ast sews mml.eeu suer rs a PSIDS esr a® seam ee� rrs»em rm (m am am w PGYI'RLL m!40[ Mq YI PALL W>@LL ] 1 1 1A] �Al 11m d yy a�effi awe® a�tT lffi e 3 3 1[UC N6 lefit ]N6 1056[ 14�5 �}ffi t16S ffi �1� 1 2 5 t 'MP lY! IMY llei tO54P ]9d1 E eR sae 1 e.a�n.. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY _ JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGETS NI41 T10N .� topolitan pr CIS - y r' 0 Since 1954 .t q�HGE COUNT 1990-1991 FISCAL YEAR [ I t r r l r [ [ ( r r r r r ( r r t _ OCOOOOI9 A snsreo 1990-91 a01R OPBMTMG Pbea BaIXffiS Bondeas or itlPfAnOR/eVAp q iOp w. N11tl0AS0o OBOOpT p00YtPdMilo IAI lei ICI Ib1 IBI fPl Ives. Bun to Ivor. on. To total Major Bud,.[ 1989u9-90 9090-9 I "flan/ pe9n4tery anvv®evded anjo[ Res.... for pevamodad Nolen Mount,, yne Ion n./nv 1. M•a O.1 is., $17,607,000 419,206,000 $720.000 9079.000 OIr 699e000 a sx,enott to Wetele^ lapses[lne•l uy 10.of Benefit• flocs vlll M rpe•ed Ised stlme�OYeddltlival py e- •W4at l�ve•e1+n9elntmt'�g1Wv eetlallltlm� lvteln/reppeel[reoeetlyy le. Glled al[ nd water mallty nitoring n,ulpNoat and Nobel. eejor 0.tmvtion projects. 3. odor Control 6 5160,1000 5,570,000 <17,000> µ11000> Isar•e•e PurpOm/Raueo for Chandual CbN.Lppl Ioea.e more... mesre.ee C..wl..i. CAlOrlve 6270.000 To [.mole 1-1. ceueua ones g55,000> ...d is fuel at. Ieadim ...abuse. evd !root Bpdrarienl 1"..to 9bet.01 hydrogen sulfide buildup. ,at.... QS,000> central•sulfide. Chloride Lm dlmetar q.. (A= Rule 431.1)• P.rrw• g6,000> PhpLLael/ch@aloLL Chloride t.aetment get mhe—" prine, alerul..per[s®.vm Alec d u1t1Ae o0vtul. ' polymer• $.69,000 e•eg•lme.••e•as flor lnvruu.. 3311e9Y9_ 3. Prof o.Wool I,850,000 3,194,000 350'... 906,000 1,366,000 • Bar vmt.mt for plant painting. and Contract • I..." geve.LL and Into. Islet •amlore. B.tviae. • Ala mlulon. emeeultant.. 6. solids Removal 5,500,000 6,000,000 300,000 300,000 500,Oo0 • Imtw. is aspo.LL ..it. for p[laet. and DisposalWants as. m.alt of trrer/tattions en Coyote Canyon Closets.wn•ed 5. Bluipment 200,000 245,000 65,000 651000 • imr0... 1e one of hug polPavt. Chp.srg.. 6. Meat..-./ 3•169.00o 3,195,000 30,000 a0,000 am,,.wideand ..,at.,ad11Ittlmm.�.odanry®ePi 9etvloa./ r...�t, supplies 1. M.eetah evd 2,070,000 2,694,000 00,000 56.,000 636,000 • Additional moitorlog regnired. Melbarlm 8. utilities 1,210,000 6,a99r000 <015,000> <016,000> •pease..did to at put—1 —0uni—ultu vw equlpm•ot. 9. Othor 2,602,000 2,978,000 100,000 216,000 116,000 • lmrm..t0 enppa[t plautl staff ace equlmost Materiel., .ddulon.. Supplies •Now amamt for AC1m pmaltle•and npe[ativl Sams. 10. total Joint 616,501,000 $50.207,000 $1,603,000 $2,010,000 83,626,000 0 ...tieq Bap... 11. Rove.... end 2,050,000 2,600,000 375,000 235,000 550,000 offset. 13. Not Joint $44,531,000 $47,107,000 µ,333,000 $1n63,000 $3,076,000 0p•retlnq SCHEDULE I JOINT OPIMTD G FUND BUDGET REVIEW & SLMMRY 5/11/90 COMPARISON OF BUDGETED & ACTUAL EXPENDITURES & ESTIMATED CARRY-OVER FISCAL YEAR 1989-90 (A) (B) (0) (D) (E) (F) (G) Budget Reocamended Increase Expenditures Estimated Increase Est'd Carry- - 1989-90 Budget or 1988-89 Expendi Or Over to Fiscal 1990-91 Decease 1989-90 Decrease Year 1990-91 1. Net Salaries, Wages & Benefits $17,687,000 $19,286,000 $1,599,000 $13,454,000 $16,157,000 $2,703,000 $1,530,000 2. Odor Control & Chemical Coagulants 5,687,000 5,670,000 <17,000c 4,594,000 4,648,000 54,000 1,039,000 3. Professional & Contract Services 7,350,000 9,194,000 1,844,000 5,646,000 6,496,000 850,000 854,000 4. Equipment Charges 200,000 245,000 45,000 185,000 215,000 30,000 <15,000> 5. Repair & Maintenance Materials & Services 3,765,000 3,795,000 30,000 3,313,000 3,361,000 48,000 404,000 6. Research & monitoring 2,070,000 2,694,000 624,000 2,511,000 2,040,000 <471,000> 30,000 7. Utilities 7,220,000 6,345,000 <875,000 4,884,000 5,051,000 167,000 2,169,000 8. Other Materials, Supplies & Outside Services 2,602,000 2,978,000 376,000 2,370,000 2,545,000 175,000 57,000 9. Total Joint Operating Expenses $46,581,000 $50,207,000 $3,626,000 $36,957,000 $40,513,000 $3,556,000 $6,068,000 10. Revenue and Offsets 2,050,000 2,600,000 550,000 2,461,000 2,700,000 239.000 <650 000> 11. Net Joint Operating $44 531 000 47,607,000 1Q,076,000 34 496 000 $37,813,000 S3,317.000 $6,718,000 L - [- C L- C- C- C t C : L L [: L: C C [ t t [ t t t t t [ t t [ [ t t t t t t - . Schedule II BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS 5/15/90 JOINT OPERATING FUND Fiscal Year 1990-91 ALLOCATION OF JOINT OPERATING EXPENDITURES A B C D B F G H I J GALLONAGE FLOWS 1990-91 FUNDING 1989-90 COMPARISON 1989-90 Estimated Estimated District Flows Estimated 1990-91 Percent District Estimated Required District Required No. Past Year Increase Flows of Total Contribution Carryover Funding Contribution Funding 1 9,897.14 MG 236.45 MG 10,133.60 MG 10.20% $ 4,853,900 $ 684,900 $ 4,169,000 $ 4,092,000 $ 3,692,000 2 30,781.43 389.37 31,170.80 31.36% 14,930,400 2,106,900 12,823,600 14,232,000 12,841,000 3 31,183.12 333.88 31,517.00 31.71% 15,096,200 2,130,300 12,965,900 14,157,000 12,773,000 5 4,808.58 152.22 4,960.80 4.99% 2,376,200 335,300 2,040,900 2,026,000 1,828,000 6 5,563.76 10.74 5,674.50 5.61% 2,670,100 376,800 2,293,300 2,587,000 2,334,000 7 7,392.88 289.62 7,682.50 7.73% 3,679,800 519,300 3,160,500 3,638,GG0 3,282,000 11 6,157.47 53.33 6,210.80 6.25% 2,974,900 419,800 2,555,100 3,175,000 2,865,000 13 466.10 175.40 641.50 0.65% 307,300 43,400 263,900 134,000 121,000 14 1,624.27 (124.87) 1,499.40 1.51% 718,200 101,300 616,900 490,000 442,000 TOTALS 97 874.75 MG 1,516.15 MG 99 390.90 MG 100.00% $ 47,607,000 6,718,000 4O 889 000 $ 44,531,000 40 178 000 JOINT ROARS OPERATING BUDGET SCHEDULE III JOINT OPERATING 6 WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS 5/I1/90 r 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1989-90 199D-91 ACTUAL ACTUAL PROJECTED BUDGET RECOMMEND ..................................................._____________ 1. SALARIES 6 WAGES 13,149,700 14,574,663 17.456,000 18,530,000 21,229,000 (a) -------------------------------------------------------_________ 2. RETIREMENT 2,191,566 1,961,706 2,496,000 3,384,000 3,035,000 (a) 3. WORKERS CON? .186,000 134,000 155,000 155,000 155,000 (al - 4. UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE I51855 6,155 25,000 25,000 25,000 la) 5. GROUP INSURANCE 1,276,752 1,193,544 1.623,000 1,509,000 1,758,000 (a) 6. UNIFORM RENTAL 51,497 69,191 74,000 84,000 84,000 (a) ---_____________________________________________________________ 7. TOTAL BENEFITS 3,721,470 3,364,596 4.373,000 5,157,000 5,057,000 (a) ---_____________________________________________________________ r 26,286,000 8. SALARIES, WAGES, 6 BENEFITS 16 1........ ......... .......... . .......... .......... 9. DIRECT CHARGES-CORF/DIST (2,249,960) (2,652,380) (3,172,000) (3,500,000) (4,000,000) 10. COST ALLOC-CORF/DIST (1,791,523) (1,832,420) (2,500,000) (2,500,000) (3,000,000) .................................................�...._.______ 1l. N.O. SALARIES 6 BENEFITS (4,041,483) (4,484,800) (5,672,000) (6,000,000) (7,000.000) (b) - __ ............................ .. 12. NET J.O. PAYROLL 12,829,687 13,454,459 16,157,000 17,617,000 19,206,000 (c) ............................................................... 13. MATERIALS, SUPPLIES, 6 SERVICES .. _______________________________ 14. GASOLINE, DIESEL 6 OIL 203,102 220,292 215.000 250,000 250,000 (d) 15. INSURANCE 857,352 553,131 585,000 600,000 600,000 (a) 16. MEMBERSHIPS 14,742 15,580 25,000 30,000 30,000 (f) 17. OFFICE EXPENSE Ia. SUPPLIES 96,092 92,D67 100,000 110,000 120,000 (g) .. 19. OTHER 49,510 61,795 75,000 55,000 65,000 (g) 20. OPERATING SUPPLIES Ynl 21. CHLORINE 6 ODOR CONTROL 1,804,810 1,966,235 1,995,000 2,100,000 2,400,000 (h) ,,. 22. SULFIDE CONTROL 605,154 565,403 618,000 1,000,000 900,000 (h) 23. CHEMICAL COAGULANTS 1.833,150 2,062,688 2,035,000 2,587,000 2,370,000 (i) 24. LAB CHEMICALS 6 SUPPLIES 83,529 158,529 180,000 140,000 186,000 (j) 25. TOOLS 75,943 82,419 70,000 85,000 95,000 1j) .. 26. SOLVENTS, PAINTS, 6 JAN. SUPPLIES 94,562 99,SIB 120,000 150,000 150,000 (j) 27. OTHER OPERATING SUPPLIES 198,576 153,105 184,000 200,000 215,000 (j) JOINT RORKS OPERATING BUDGET SCHEDULE III lJ JOINT OPERATING 6 WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS 5/11/90 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR � I 1987-BB 1988-89 1989-90 1989-90 1990-91 r ACTUAL ACTUAL PROJECTED BUDGET RECOMMEND ---------------------------------------------------------------- 6r 28. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 29. GBOUMDSKEEPING 42,975 44,618 65,000 100,000 125,000 (k) y 30. OUTSIDE LAS SERVICES 15,903 115,711 00,000 400,000 404,000 (k) 31. SOLIDS REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL 2,767,538 4,653,931 5,200,000 5,500,000 6,000,000 (k) 32. OTHER HASTE DISPOSAL 25,910 25,236 28,000 105,000 190,000 (k) r 33. OXYGEN PLANT OPEN 6 NICE 0 0 180,000 400,000 420,000 (k) 34. OTHER 240,114 273,394 273,000 235,000 778,000 (k) lJ 35. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 36. GENERAL, LABOR 6 SPECIAL COUNSEL 267,496 326,028 395,000 275,000 650,000 (1) r' 37. AUDIT 6 ACCOUNTING 19,970 22,621 25,000 25,000 27,000 (1) j 38. ENGINEERING 39,201 0,237 30,000 50,000 75,000 (1) 4u 39. OTHER 139,833 175,696 220,000 180,000 525,000 (1) v 40. PRINTING 6 PUBLICATION 41. REPRO-IN-HOUSE 76,543 95,683 110,000 100,000 140,000 (m) 42. PRINTING-OUTSIDE 49,214 28,247 60,000 50,000 100,000 43. PHOTO PROCESSING 19,773 15,887 22,000 20,000 25,000 (A) r 44. NOTICES 6 ADS 26,243 54,294 75,000 75,000 85,000 u 45. RENTS 6 LEASES 46. OUTSIDE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 63,645 71,237 100,000 100,000 120,000 (n) y 47. DISTRICT EQUIPMENT RENTAL 105,864 113,972 115,060 100,000 125.000 (n) 48. REPAIRS 6 MAINTENANCE 49. MATERIALS 2.755,442 3,241,500 3,211,000 3,600.000 3,600,000 (o) lu 50. CONTRACTS 123,602 71,767 150,000 165,000 195,000 (o) 51. RESEARCH 6 MONITORING u 52. OCEAN MONITORING 1,759,596 2,314,126 1,700,000 1,700,000 2.104,000 (p) 53. OCEAN/I.H./OPER RESEARCH 184,303 196,524 340,000 370,000 590,000 (p) u 60 r JOINT NORMS OPERATING BUDGET SCHEDULE III JOINT OPERATING 6 WORMING CAPITAL FUNDS 5I11190 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR r 1907.08 1988-89 1989-90 1989-90 1990.91 ACTUAL ACTUAL PROJECTED BUDGET RECOMMEND ................................................................ r 51. TRAINING, MEETINGS, 6 TRAVEL 5A,051 82,07/ 124,000 125,000 115,000 (0) 55. UNCOLLECTABLE ACCOUNTS 0 257 0 2,000 2,000 (r) r 56. UTILITIES 57. DIESEL FOR GENERATORS 116,270 107,911 90,000 200,000 200,000 (s) 58. POWER 3,993,300 4,446,142 4,641,000 6,500,000 5,700.000 (s) 59. NATURAL GAS 113,916 123.930 100,000 250,000 175,000 (s) 60. TELEPHONE 105,982 103,351 100.000 120,000 120,000 (s) r 61. WATER 92.332 102,160 120,000 150,000 150,000 (s) 62. OTHER EXPENSES r 63. FREIGHT 35,491 41,283 40,000 40,000 45,000 (t) 64. GENERAL 221,745 271.927 280,000 275,000 300,000 (t) 65. RIND OPERATING FEES 0 67,330 210,ODO 250,000 300,000 (t) 66. PRIOR YEARS EXPENSE 15,546 250,618 30,000 50,000 50,000 (u) 67. OTHER WON-OPERATING EXPENSE 41,805 46,411 40,000 45,000 45,000 (v) r -----------_____________________________________________________ 68. TOTAL MAIL, SUPPLIES, 6 SERVICES 19,514,916 23,502,855 24,356,000 28,894,000 30,921,000 69. COST ALLOCATION-COAF 6 OTHER (299,277) (358,098) (500,000) (350,000) (600,000) IW) ________________________________________________________________ 70. NET J.O. NAT'L, SUPPLIES, G SEBV 19,225,639 23,144.757 23,856,000 28,544,000 30,321.000 (x) r 71. REVENUE (1,482,319) (2,103,387) (2,200,000) (1,700,000) (2,000,000) (Y) ________________________________________________________________ 72. NET J.D. EXPENDITURES 30,573,001 34,495,829 37,813,000 44,531,000 47,607,000 (t) r V r r r May 11, 1990 SCHEDULE IV NOTES TO JOINT OPERATING FUND BUDGET 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR 4 (a) Salaries, Wages and Benefits - See attached Schedule V for 1990-91 salaries and benefits estimates and projected payroll savings. Estimated 1989-90 salaries and benefits are below budget primarily because delayed construction schedules allowed positions to remain vacant. .. (b) Cost Allocations and Direct Chargebacks to CORF and - Individual Districts - Represents direct labor and benefits chargebacks and cost allocation to the appropriate fund for which the work is actually performed (CORP for work on treatment plants' capital expansion; respective Capital Facilities funds for work on individual District's collection facilities capital expansion; and Operating funds for maintenance and repair) . Also reflects administrative time chargeable to self-funded insurance programs; and Source Control Division and Laboratory Division charges to respective Districts for industrial waste monitoring and enforcement program. ., (c) Net JO Payroll — This line item represents the net salaries, wages and benefits chargeable to Joint Operating Fund for administration and maintenance/operation of the joint works facilities, after chargebacks to other funds for services performed by the labor pool described above in (b) . (d) Gasoline, Oil and Fuel - This account includes gasoline, oil and diesel fuel required to operate stationary treatment plant equipment as well as approximately 300 pieces of major mobile equipment such as vehicles, cranes, etc. .. (e) Insurance - Includes Board and staff out-of-county travel policy, employee fidelity bond, all-risk (earthquake and flood) policy, fire, boiler and machinery policies. The major elements of this account are $323,000 for $35 million in coverage provided by the comprehensive all-risk policy and $258,000 for in-lieu premiums to increase the reserve levels `. in the self-insured public liability fund pursuant to the Boards' decision to fully self-insure liability risk. .. (f) Memberships - Districts' memberships in Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) , California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA) , Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency (SARFPA) , and Long Beach Safety Council. .. (g) office Expense - This account includes supplies, forms, small office equipment, drafting materials; technical journals and �, postage for all departments. Schedule IV Page 2 bw (h) Chlorine a Odor Control Chemicals - The Districts presently use chlorine, and sodium hydroxide (caustic soda) as primary odor control chemicals in the treatment plants. Usage of „ chlorine is expected to remain at 1989-90 levels during the year It but unit prices have increased. Caustic soda use in the foul air scrubbers at both plants however, is expected to increase over 50% as new scrubbers are placed into service. Caustic � 1 soda is also added to trunklines to control hydrogen sulfide in the lines, and $237,000 has been added to the chemical budget for the Joint Works, share of this expense for the in plant odor control benefits. Ferrous chloride use, required to control hydrogen sulfide levels in our digester gas as required by AQMD Rule 431.1, will decrease by slightly, partially as a result of increased ferric chloride for physical/chemical treatment. During the course of this year, we expect to optimize use of the various odor control chemicals, but expect our overall usage levels and budget requirements to remain high as we maintain compliance with increasingly stringent air quality , I regulations. V (i) Chemical Coagulants - We expect that the increased polymer usage level increase in 1990-91 result in a increase of yj $69,000 for the material. Polymer is added to the influent wastewater along with ferric chloride via the physical/ „ chemical treatment systems at both plants to improve solids L removal efficiencies in the primary clarifier basins. It is also added to digested sludge prior to dewatering to cause the sludge to coagulate to improve the sludge and water separation process. �r Ferric chloride is used as a backup chemical in the event the primary chemical distribution systems are out of service for repairs or maintenance, but primarily for enhanced primary physical/chemical clarifier performance. Physical/chemical treatment systems were fully installed and operational at both plants this past year, and we expect to decrease our budgeted 6+ use of ferric chloride in these systems by $76,000. A portion of ferric chloride costs are included in the odor control i ' chemical category to account for this additional benefit from L its use. (j ) Other Operating Supplies - Miscellaneous items such as scrubber acids, activated carbon, solvents, cleaners, hardware, janitorial supplies, tools, laboratory supplies, etc. required to operate and maintain existing and expanding facilities. Schedule IV .r Page 3 .. (k) Contractual Services - The major component of this category is sludge removal and disposal. Contracts have been executed with Recyc Inc. , Pima Gro and Curti Enterprise for agricultural reuse of residual solids. The Coyote Canyon landfill was closed this past year and no replacement site has yet been approved within the county. A total of $6 million has been budgeted for solids removal and disposal. This account also includes appropriations for groundskeeping services, toxics removal services, outside laboratory services, trash pickup, plant site sweeping, data processing system maintenance and support services, and temporary help - - to level out periodic increases in staff workload and staffing levels. A maintenance and operations contract was implemented in February for the Plant 2 oxygen generation _ plant and $420,000 has been budgeted for that service contract. .. (1) Professional Services - Includes General Counsel, special - labor counsel, CPA audit and miscellaneous accounting, data processing, engineering and other consulting services. (m) Printing and Publications - Budget allows for in-house and outside reproduction costs and reflects expanded management .. information system and increasingly complex administrative requirements, as well as continuing demand by public and regulatory agencies for information on Districts' activities. The continuing efforts of our Public Information Officer (PIO) to improve our public education program on Districts' activities is also reflected in the increased budget for this line item. This account also includes costs of advertisements �+ and notices in our continuing effort to recruit quality staff to meet master planned objectives. (n) Rents and Leases - This account includes cost accounting system charges to the Joint Operating Fund for Districts-owned equipment, and outside equipment rental for major equipment used for emergency repairs. The 1990-91 allocation has been increased slightly to reflect the increased usage levels of large equipment required over the past four years to support major repairs and maintenance in our upgraded and ,. expanded facilities. (o) Repairs and Maintenance - This item, which is for parts and services for repair of plant facilities, reflects an " authorization to allow for routine equipment maintenance. . . Should this level allocation prove to be insufficient in the event of major unexpected equipment failures and/or repairs, a transfer from the unappropriated reserves of the individual Districts would be necessary to meet the increased obligation. r V Schedule IV Page 4 (p) Research and Monitoring - $2,000,000 in this account is for contract services to carry out the extensive ocean monitoring program required by EPA Region IX under the provisions of the Districts' NPDES permit, which became effective April 1, 1985. The account includes the Districts' contribution to the u Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) being conducted under a joint powers agreement with other Southern California municipal dischargers, and also provides for some operational research and evaluation to develop optimum operating parameters in the treatment plants. (q) Training. Meetings and Travel'- Expanding activities of regulatory agencies have required increased Board member and staff travel in recent years. It is expected that considerable travel will continue to be required in connection with our continued efforts to obtain an extension of our NPDES permit conditions. Also includes ongoing technical training and materials for staff, expansion of our supervisory training program to help provide supervisors with the necessary training to more effectively manage their Divisional groups, and required training for new computerized control systems and other "high tech" equipment. r (r) Uncollectible Accounts - For miscellaneous accounts that are determined by the General Counsel and Director of Finance to be uncollectible. (s) Utilities - The $5.7 million allocation for purchased power in I � this item reflects an $800,000 decrease from 1989-90 budgeted levels due to lower than anticipated requirements of additional air scrubbers, electric motors at the new Ocean Outfall Booster Station, and avoidance of peak-demand hours for electrical equipment. (t) Other Operating Expenses - Expenses not chargeable elsewhere, such as freight and miscellaneous items, and annual permit renewal fees and penalties assessed by the SCAQMD. (u) Expenses Applicable to Prior Years - Represents adjustments 10 to an operating or non-operating account balance from previous years. (v) Other Non-Operating Expenses - Miscellaneous items not chargeable elsewhere. i (w) Cost Allocation and Direct Chargebacks to CORP and Individual Districts - For materials, supplies and services cost allocation and chargebacks for same purposes as described above under (b) . r u u Schedule IV ` Page 5 r+ (x) Net JO Materials, Supplies and Services - This line item represents the net materials, supplies and services chargeable -- to the Joint Operating Fund for administration and maintenance „y and operation of the Joint Works Facilities, after chargebacks to other funds. (y) Net Revenues - Budget amount is for sales of various sewage treatment process by-products, revenues from the wastehauler _ disposal facilities at Plant No. 1, sampling chargebacks to individual Districts, and miscellaneous items. (z) Net JO Requirements - This line item represents the net Joint Operating Requirements after reduction of the Total Joint Operating Requirements by the revenues generated from sale of by-products, charges to other agencies, and other _ miscellaneous operating revenues. `Y r r ti r r r r JOINT OPERATING FUND Schedule V (AND WORKING CAPITAL REVOLVING FUND) 5/11/90 .d PROJECTED SALARIES & BENEFITS 1990-91 .d - Anticipated At Full Payroll Recommended Employment Savin s Budget SALARIES & WAGES 23,853,000 2,624,000 21,229,000 (1 r BENEFITS: 1. Retirement 3,410,000 375,000 3,035,000 (2a 2. Workers' Compensation 155,000 -0- 155,000 (2b 3. Unemployment Insurance 25,000 -0- 25,000 (2c 4. Group Medical ., - Self-Funded (includes 1,405,000 141,000 1,264,000 (2d transfers) - HMO 403,000 40,000 363,000 - Disability 81,000 8,000 73,000 - Life 64,000 6,000 58,000 S. Uniforms 92,000 8,000 84,000 (2e 6. Total Benefits 5,635,000 578,000 5,057,000 „ TOTAL SALARIES, 29,488,000 3,202,000 26,286,000 WAGES & BENEFITS NOTES: 1) Salaries & Wages - Full employment projection based on the assumption that all 626 authorized permanent positions and the 44 Summer Work Program positions are filled as set forth in the personnel recommendations. Because of our ability to sometimes temporarily v, minimize staffing by adjusting plant operational modes, personnel turnover and strict controls on filling vacancies, we have targeted our payroll cost at $26.3 million next year (10.9% over the 1989-90 budget) which will realize a payroll savings of $3,202,000. If, however, turnover and vacancies are lower, it may be necessary to allocate additional funds from the unappropriated reserve accounts of the individual Districts. 2) Benefits - Remarks above under Salaries and Wages regarding full employment of authorized positions also apply to benefits. (a) Retirement - The Districts' employees are members of the Orange County Employees Retirement System pursuant to our MOU's. 1 ' r SCHEDULE V Page 2 ) I w (b) Workers' Compensation - Amount includes total estimated expenditures for the workers' compensation program set forth in detail in the enclosed Workers' Compensation Self-Insured Fund Budget on Schedule VI. An appropriation of $155,000 ' ! is recommended for 1990-91 to maintain the current level of r accumulated reserves as recommended by the Fiscal Policy Committee. 11 (c) Unemployment Insurance - The Districts are on an actual r claim basis because of favorable history and only $25,000 in contributions were required for the last year. We anticipate if making similar contributions in 1990-91. r (d) Group Medical - Includes the Districts' share of employee I ; medical plan benefits for the prepaid HMO plans, the estimated w total costs of the self-funded indemnity plan and the life and disability insurance premiums. Schedule VII details the 1 � expected costs of the self-funded plan and the last of three r annual increased employee contributions included in current MOUs. The recommended budget increase reflects our increased staffing level as well as increased costs. 11 r (a) Uniforms - This budget projection is in accordance with employee MOU's. We have again been able to obtain favorable ) ! bids for uniform rental, and the unit costs of uniform service r have not increased for several years. 11 r 1 � r 1 ! r r I � r 1 + lr Y �.i JOINT MONKS OPERATING BUDGET WORKERS' COMPENSATION SXLP-INSURED rUND SCHEDULE VI 1990-91 PISCAL YEAR 5/1/90 1989-90 1990-91 1989-90 ESTIMATED RECOMMENDED EXPENDITURES BUDGET EXPENDITURES BUDGET 1. galaxies, Wages and Benefits 16,000 15,336 17,000 2. Benefits/Claims 110,000 107,496 110,000 3. Contractual Services 13,000 12,650 16,000 4. Legal Services 5,000 0 3,000 5. Professional Services 25,000 25,337 30,000 S. Supplies A Other 1,000 6,422 7,000 7. Sub-Total 170.000 167.241 183,000 B. Excess Lose Policy 40,000 31,835 35,000 9. Total Expenditures 210,OVU 199,076 218,000 REVENUES A RESERVES 10. In-Lieu Premiums 155,000 155,000 155,000 11. Interest A Miscellaneous 55,000 62,968 63,000 12. Total Revenues 210,000 217,968 218,000 12. Excess Revenue (Expenditures) 0 18,892 0 13. Reserves and Transfers 699,000 677.487 696,000 14. Ending Reserve. 699,000 696,379 696,000 WCDUD90.XLS-5/9/90 JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET SELF-FUNDED HEALTH PLAN TRUST FUND SCHEDULE VII 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR 5/1/90 1989-90 1990-91 EST. 90-91 1990-91 1989-90 ESTIMATED AT FULL PAYROLL RECOMMENDED EXPENDITURES BUDGET MENDITURE9 EMPLOYMENT SAVINGS BUDGET ___________ ---------- ------------ ___________ ____________ 1. Clalse - Medical 940,000 780.516 1,D51,000 (105,000) 946,000 2. - Disability 28,000 6.009 0 0 a 3. - Lang Teti Disability 90,000 11,806 0 0 0 4. - Dental 189.000 153,792 190,000 (20,000) 170,000 5. Sub-Total 1,247,D00 952,123 1,241,000 (125,000) 1,116,000 7. Contractual Services 42,000 40,313 53,000 (5,000) 48,000 S. Stop Lose Insurance 84,000 78,922 111,000 (11,000) 100,000 8. Total Expenditures 1,373,000 1,D71,358 1,405,000 (141,000) 1,264,000 REVENUES A RESERVES 9. In-Lieu Presiuss Fros - CSDOc 1.001,000 701,393 877,000 (86,000) 792,000 - Roployee 154,000 137,346 210,000 (20,000) 190,000 10. Interest A Miscellaneous 0 2,578 0 0 0 11. Reieburse Pros Stop Lose Ins. 0 25,229 0 0 0 12. Total Revenue 1,155,000 866,546 1,087,000 (105,000) 982.000 13. Excess Revenue (Expenditures) (218,000) (204,812) (318,000) 36,000 (282,000) 14. Transfers 223,000 336,260 318,000 (36,000) 282,000 15. Beginning Reserves 155,000 24,283 156,000 156,000 16. Ending Reaerve9 160.000 155,731 156,000 0 156,000 SFEUD90.XL5-5/17/90 JOINT BORES OPMTING BUDGET PUBLIC LIABILITY SELF-INSURED FUND SCHEDULE VIII 1990-91 FISCAL TEAM, 5/07/89 2 _ 1989-90 1990-91 1959-90 ESTIMATED Rzcom E " EEPENDITURES BUDGET EXPENDITURES BUDGET 1. Salaries, was" atM Benefits 1,000 0 1,000 2. Benefita/claim 20,000 13,582 20,000 3. contractual Services 8,000 4,776 7,000 A. Legal Services 25.000 28,356 33,000 5. Professional Services 1.000 0 1,000 6. Supplies A Other 1,000 1.227 2,000 7. Sub-Total 56,000 47.9/1 66,000 , 8. Este.. We. Polity 265,000 265,000 9. Total Expandituraa 321,000 57,911 329,000 REVENUES A RESERVES 10. In-Lieu Premium 258.000 258.000 258.000 11. Interest A Miacallansous 120,000 143.360 140,000 12. Allocation to Other Funds 0 0 0 12. Total Revenue. 378.000 407.360 398,000 12. Exc... Revenue (Expenditures) 57.000 359,419 69,000 13. Reserves and Transfer* 1.648,000 1,513,403 1,903.000 14. Ending Reserve. 1,705,000 1,902,822 1,972,000 PLBUD90.XL5-5/9/90 - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY JOINT WORKS CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND PsilATip^ .� 9 topolitan p �ls U — � Since 195t* BINGE COON 1990-1991 FISCAL YEAR CORF A.XLS 5/15/90 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SCHEDULE A SUMMARY OF DISTRICT'S REQUIREMENTS AND COMPARISON TO LAST YEAR A B C D E F 1990-91 1990-91 BUDGET 1989-90 PRELIHI14ARY COMPARABLE DISTRICT EQUITY BUDGET BEGINNING GRANT BUDGET PERCENT REQUIREMENTS RESERVES FUNDS REQUIREMENTS 1 9.98% 10,321,000 (b) 8,739,000 100,000 10,252,000 (b) 2 28.66% 29,641,000 (a) 30,362,000 287,000 29,441,000 (a) 3 31.26% 32,330,000 (a) 40.450,000 313,000 32,112,000 (a) 5 4.80% 4,964,000 (b) 2,404,000 48,000 4,931,000 (b) 6 5.33% 5,512,000 (b) 4,250,000 53,000 5,475,000 (b) 7 7.54% 7,798,000 (a) 14,910,000 75,000 7.745,000 (a) 11 6.60% 6.826,000 (b) 2.514,000 • 66,000 6,780,000 (b) 13 0.26% 269,000 7,736,000 3,000 267,000 14 5.57% 5,761,000 (c) 56.000 5,722,000 (c) TOTAL 100.00% 103,422,000 111,365,000 1.000.000 1 L 102,725,000 • Includes sale of capacity in Slater System to District 3 approved May 9, 1990 (a) Long-range financial projections indicate these Districts may need to issue debt in 1990-91 (b) Long-range financial projections indicate these Districts will need to issue debt in 1990-91 (c) Fonds will be provided by required deposits from IRWD 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 S/11/90 CAPITAL OUTLAY RIVOLwIKO IONO SCw1UUL1 Bd BONNAIT Of DD117 Hilo CONSTIOCTION IIIOIIININTS Pepe 1 19f0.1191 TO 1999-2000 A B C D I I a I I a 1 A 0116 TOTAL INTIIID Split 1NTINATID ligillfD 1171471D ISTI4710 12f1PeTgP IITIGTIO pill IST1mafID 1f9 Calf t0 PWPeCT ima P1011Cf say C.I.P. leasNT BIDGI7 BBOG17 Ilea" BOeONT IIAI BODGIT is AS CONPLISI 1919.90 1990.11 6/30/90 1190-91 1391-92 199E-94 1191.14 1394-95 TOTAL 1995.2000 TOTAL HURTS ........... ............................ ................................................................. '......---....--------................. ............ I. lee led tetidgeted Major Projects A. lecillitlre Halt 1 1. Keadverla 10.2 1 Plat 10.1, PI.20/PI.31 31,455,000 31,206,116 31,701,126 500,001 560,006 500,001 1. wsatebealer Disposal A People Ste PI.21d/213 3,010,123 2,040,423 500,001 500,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 3. Primary C1¢1f1ari Not. 6.15, P143 10,111,000 f1,769,972 13,719,111 17,000,006 10,000,000 1,000,000 26,000,000 21,001,040 /. oil ludiire facilities, PI-31-1 12,920,006 14,416,911 2,411,110 7,010,000 3,000,000 12,000,000 12,000,000 5. little Bredliag facilities, fl.34-2 21,500,000 20,021,504 6,171,501 11000,004 6.000,000 250,000 11,250,000 14,250,000 6. Digesters 11.16. PI-H-3 25,110,000 32,001,665 1,665 71000,000 151000,000 10,000.000 32,000,000 32,004,000 7. Iobabllltittea of Digesters 7 11, PI.35.1 2,593,000 11311,109 21211,109 $6,001 50,000 $1,000 1. lebebllltitlo0 of Digesters 9 A 10, PI.35.2 3,510,000 1,500,000 500,000 1,500,400 1,500,000 3,516,000 3,500,000 9. SecneOary Trot Sipaoslva to 10 BID, PI.36 21,01,100 31,161,015 64,015 6001000 715001ODD 13,000,000 10,000,000 31,100,000 31,101,000 It. P[Imary Treotmeat 12 No tmpaelloo, 11.37 32,500,000 34,100,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 19,600,001 12,000,o01 1,100,000 31,000,000 34,000,006 11. Nile. Nodlflcetiol, Pt-31 10,063,211 3,211 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,6//,101 1,000,006 16,000,000 14,000,000 12. Security A saadeceplog, PI.31.1 1,100,000 500,001 1,000,000 300,000 1,100,000 1,800,411 13. tsrtbpoate Work, PI.36-2 1,900,000 t00,o60 1150010DO 1,100,000 1,900,006 If. seismic Opgradleg I stractural wort, PI.31-3 3,010,660 3,000,000 700,000 2,000,000 300,000 3,000,001 1,006,040 15. fuel writes Peproveleats, 1.033-1 170,041 222,131 22,111 200,000 200,000 101,061 16. to KID Orygoo Activated Sledge A DAVs i5,163,000 66,000,000 1,116,000 1,000,000 ntool,000 17. Belt freseee (/ Will 14,300,000 15,500,000 500,000 2,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 15,500,001 15,501,040 11. solids storage 19 Biagi 16,171,000 11,000,000 6,010,000 1'000,006 $,000,000 It. Digesters: 21110' Director 9,100,001 9,200,000 1,000,160 3,210,000 1,201,001 7,460,000 1,600,000 1,100,000 20. Stsadby Power 0entrctloa 7,73S,000 7,715,000 2,100,000 S,435,000 7,735,000 7,135,400 21. Site Ilectrical Power Distribution 2,477,000 2,600,106 600,004 100,000 2,610,"0 2,I00,ODO 22. Ilectriflcetloe Project 2,101,000 2,250,000 200,000 113/0,000 751,000 2,250,000 2,250,000 23. Bee Sewage leergency Bypass 1,991,000 1,000,060 2,000,000 2,000,000 21. Veers Triclliag filters 1 A 3 1,300,000 1,300,606 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,)00,000 25. Coutril Air Compressor Stories 250,000 250,016 $1,000 200,000 151,001 150,000 26. Nile. Projects 10,0001 coo 10,ISO oil ISO 0001,000,oil I,IS$ DID 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,010,coo 5,600,000 10,000,000 /18-TOTAL - IICLANATION PLANT 1 321,811,000 161,501,S6f 6i,166,S6f 15,650,110 Sf,IS0,110 51,100,111 19,011,016 11,715,000 211rf3f,000 17,161,600 131,335,001 /1,001,000 r CAPITAL ODTWT INVOLVING IUD SCRIDOLI 9-1 BOXIIAII Of MISS VOIXB COIIIIDCTION IIQUIUMIITC Pape 2 1590-1991 TO 1999-2000 A B C D I I G B T I I L 0110 TOTAL ASPIRIN IDEAL ISTIMATID I1QWRID ISTIMITIO IBTIWTID IIT1nTID 117likTiD fill nHOT1O 1n Met 10 PROJECT 1s? PIOJICT In C.I.P. MOUNT BODGIT Blocs? AUDIT BBWIT Told low yN MQLnf 1969-90 199041 1130190 1190-91 1551-22 1991-93 1993-91 1194.95 TOTAL 1195-2000 TOTAL PIOJnn ----------- ---------------------------- '........................-........------..--..................... ............-............-............. ----------- B. Treatmedt Pint 2 1. Support facilities and Bite Imnavemts a. Operations Balldiag, P3-23-5-1 3,125,001 3,n5,000 25,060 100,010 2,000,000 1,500,100 3,600,000 3,600,000 I. Welcome Bulldiag, P2-35.2 4,950,001 5,261,000 14,000 250,000 1,n0,000 3,000,000 1,000,000 5,250,000 5,250,000 c. Maintenance Balldinp , lb35.3 1,200,000 5,211,000 11,000 250,000 1,000,000 3,000,000 1.040,000 5,250,000 S,250,000 I. Cnstrntlom Macanmelt Office, P2.35•1 I,LI,000 1,302,n0 14,000 500,000 100,000 11,000 1,288,000 11268,000 e. Phase II Bite and 9ecurily Isprneseats, 12-35-5 1,300,000 2,315,000 5,000 100,000 1,300,000 900,000 21300,000 2,300,000 2. Nice Mod. L laprneseats to facilities, I2.37 1,162,000 6,154,000- 7,158,001 1,000,001 1,000,000 1,000,000 3. leash Digester I, J. 1, P2.39.1 2,650,000 3,312,000 387,010 11500,001 11500,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 1. Rehab Digester L, N, PZ-39-2 1,161,000 3,000,000 1,001,000 2,001,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 5. Rehab Digester A. 0, 12.39.3 1,761,000 4,000,000 210001000 21000,000 1,000,ODD 1,000,060 6. Process control loptovesests, P2-10 210,000 431,010 111,001 250,000 250,000 250,000 7. Primary}testiest 21 BED Redwine, P2.11 11,300,060 15,001,000 I5100610n 15,000,000 1. Secondary Treatment Nepsssies, P242 10,400,140 21,214,000 214,001 2,000,000 1,000,000 12,000,060 1,000,100 21,000,000 21,000,000 9. Ilectrlficetion Project, PI.12.1 6,500,000 14,100,000 1,600,000 6,000,000 5,100,000 11,000,000 14,000,000 10. Kite. Xodificitiaas, P2.13-1 3,509,000 9,001 500,000 1,000,000 2,000,no 31500.000 1,540,000 It. larth0aale Vorl, P2-13-2 3,000,000 500,48 1,506,100 1,000,000 3,000,000 3,110,000 12. raise lc Opprading 1 Structural lark, P2-13-3 4,305,000 4,305,000 705,100 1,000,000 1,600,000 1,303,000 4,305,006 13. nAltollDiMutfal System, PHI 5,330,000 1,010,000 10,000 2.001,000 1,500,400 500,101 4,000,000 4,011,000 II. net System Impractical,, 1-033.2 170,600 263,000 113,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 15. Standby lover Gemafmlln 9,206,000 1,200,000 9,200,000 1,200,000 16. Solid, storage: 2 Slat 5,200,000 5,1Do,0o0 100,000 2,405,001 2,400,000 5,200.000 54200,000 17. Additlooal IDS lot Digester 3,695,000 i3OD0,000 21000,010 21000,800 2,000,000 Is. Potable Vale[ Dimtribitlom System 3,809,010 3,800,000 300,000 300,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 19. Plant Voter Pump statics 1,170,100 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,DDo 20. Misc. Projects 10,000,000 10,400,000 400,001 1,000,000 1,600,000 1,000,000 1,100,00o 1,000,000 5,BOB Doi 5,Doe 000 10,000 DO ---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---..... .- --------.. ..-------- ------.--.. .--------- -----...... ---------- SOS-fITll • 71Witl1IT PWIT 3 In,152,000 I25,111,000 I,S//,001 11,305,000 21,500,000 16,/00,000 9,101,001 3,III,o00 11,3f3,000 1S,f00,0o0 125,211,001 2,000,000 WITAL oALAI IIHLVies IW SCHOOLS 1.1 SOWIT of JOINT SOW ColAsOAiol liguimiA1 Pqe 3 1990-Iffl To I991-E004 1 B C 0 I I 6 1 1 J 1 L DAIS MAL II/IIID Tom IAWTes "QuIllb IAIATID IOTIAHP SA UDH ISTIUHD fill 191IH/11 111 COLS 70 PIOJIA IS? FROJIA 197 C.I.P. BHGIT BODGR IOOGA IIOGIT AH1y /IA IOOGIf flu COIPLIti Ifl!-90 I110-11 6131199 THIN-11 11l1-1E ISHdI 1S11-fl I911.15 TALL I115-3061 "?At PIOJICT9 C. 1@claiation ?lost lite, 1. llte Acguilltiot 15,101,001 5,001,001 5,010,100 5,010,160 5,004,001 1. teclaiation Plait 7 63,061,001 11,006,106 100,060 1,941,100 16,116,111 25,101,001 15,000,000 61,000,100 61,001,010 HI-TOTAL - IICLWTI01 PLAAI 71,000,000 16 0" 000 51100,100 E f01 600 11,041,101 25,100,001 15,G01,601 0,146,4111 61,000,041 D. Ialerpint aid Joint facilities 1. loterplesl feclllter, 1-9 4. 130. mterpleot line 27,606,101 11,015,100 15,000 1,600,000 11,004,000 1,111,100 E1,001,000 E4,001,010 I. mlerplait Utility C6es@ 1,040,000 6,60f,000 1,000,000 3,600,000 1,001,000 1,640,140 6,600,010 C. Industrial peter Lite 110,010 1,050,000 1,000,100 2,000,001 3,110,460 3,066,000 d. Digester Cis Lime 100,000 1.000.040 500,000 501,000 1,000,010 1,041,401 e. Coaiunailioes Cable 120,000 1E6,000 100,000 10,000 110,1/0 116,111 3. Support facilities sod Site Iaproeemb a. Akio. 1111dleg lapis. L lelab., J-7-1, J-7-5 1,740,006 5,151'155 4,151'155 1,000,000 1,140,411 1,101,411 b. lebob/Cone lest Lin to office at At 1, 1-11-1 900,000 1,051,115 1,115 51,000 1,006,400 l,IS1,6/1 1,150,100 a Ceslnl Laboratory, 1-17 1,711,140 7,591,411 399,411 4,000,040 1,000,000 E10,100 7,216,411 1,261,000 d. tuelanefltlm[eesne Bldg,. 6 Oil Dnl, J-11 3,114,1es 11151153f 31551,536 E61,161 E00,010 361,1es I. Operitioal/Central Center, J-13-1-1 1,570,410 1,11l,001 l(1,006 1,510,001 3,500,101 $40,000 4.501,600 1,510,101 1. farnoeeel Balldlop At Ill 1, J-E6 111,001 1,102,611 1,615 100,001 500,101 400,100 1,001,101 1,600,114 9. Demolltlol of Support Bslldip at Plait 3, J-27 51.611 1,611 50,661 50,000 51.004 1. Central Generation Hcliitl s. Inelastic !repatriate, J-111 11,000,000 20,107,111 10,807,111 5,000,000 1,014,000 1,040,660 1,601,661 1,111,000 9,000,000 1,400,100 10,000,110 b. Wailes Patches@, J-I11 1,054,000 3,731,130 3,733,130 C. Plant I Facility, Ja9.1 15,100,000 16125,1E3 1,135,13E 6,000,000 1,004,000 1,010,010 15,000,/10 15,000,000 d. Plant 1 facility, J-H-3 35,71f,000 30,561,15! 1,541,151 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,040,000 16,010,100 11,000,001 1. Waite Gas Ann, J-11, MIA 762,004 100,41) 50,413 650,000 650,001 650,000 S. Oulfill I Bonier Pulp 9Fatloll a. leplaceent of 111 Oulfatl Bever, J-33-1 IL@id1 2,020,000 1,001,561 1,011,561 1,000,000 111/01100 1,014,006 b. leplace OOtfill go. 1 Laid Section, J-37-1 3,111,000 2,500,000 500,100 1,000,001 2,500,000 2,116,010 C. it. Sorge Tots" am. 1, J-EI-3 1,300,004 1,000,000 1,004,006 1,660,406 4,001,040 1,040,101 d. ?tip CA ltitioa fat O tfall la. 1 2,604,001 3,600,000 2,604,040 2,611,110 e. Seemed Discharge leader HIS eC 1,164,001 1,000,001 460,100 401,016 3,616,000 4,161,066 f. [trend 711 to Deep later llte III, Otlfill l6,311,000 40,000,000 31,101,144 31,061,001 11,110,000 6. Itllwent flouter aid Test Pacility,J-31/I4A/11B 500,001 571,606 A,606 511,100 500,011 511,610 7. Prepllnlon of 0lilily Atlas, J-E5 2,500,000 $00,000 1,000,000 1,101,000 2,500,104 2,501,401 1. feleplooeftelnelq/laiilariag 1"estina 3,040,000 561,011 500,006 2,461,006 ],ISO,$$$ 3,011,401 1. ltlnless0ce Nnlgesesl Computer pates 901,0D1 511,011 111,011 960,111 11. Bombard Interplial Trost leplicetait 26,370,100 30,010,110 1,110,100 5,0001001 15,100,041 21,00,111 9,009,111 11,601,411 11. Iieclricil Power $Maim Ielabililatics Lhdies 3,000,0/0 4,110,000 101,010 1,000,000 1,100,000 3,300,001 2,060,041 I,H1,110 R. Sludge Disposal Irolecn 1. Compost OelAnaitiO3 Plitt 1,000,000 1,000,100 2,100,000 6,300,000 9,000,040 1,010,000 b. Lind Acgulsiliom EE,010,000 23,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 2,101,060 31,000.000 23,000,000 c. Landfill De@elopaeat Phase 1 20,600,000 20,600,000 13,010,400 13,000,000 15,600,000 d. Compost Facility 50,100,000 50,100,000 5,011,010 5,040,000 15,360,000 13, 111c Projects S 000 000 10 100 IOU 100 000 1.000.00 1.000.000 1.000.000 1.000.000 1.000.000 5.000.040 5.100.001 11,110,000 SU-TAAL - il7I1PLSA I JOINT 116,Hi,001 111,E61,iA 31,S11,t1E 11,156,001 51,110,000 13,610,40/ If,300,001 E1,701,D00 IIf,110,001 12,311,000 231,114,000 711H0,001 SOB-TOTAL - nice IIOJICTJ 11f 661 000 f07 fOS ISI 103 701 ISI 19 10f 00o Ili AO 000 I.E 350 100 If ]01 p01 61 I31 000 515 ITS off "1 !16 Oa0 "1 11, 110 Ill III fee CAPITAL OUTLIT IDVOLVING fast 1CIIDIIN B-I OMIT or JOIN}WORKS COls?IOCTIOV 1101111M1@1 Pepe / 1990.1191 TO 1999-2000 A 1 C 0 I f G B I J I L ONTO TOTAL IIVISIS MAL IITIIITID IIguillb If1BAT10 ISTIMATND ESTINA}I0 ISTII)TID full ITIKA}ID }O COS} TO P103ICT 1ST P10JICT I8} C.LP. INSIST ROBUST ROBUST IDIGIT B000@ TRANS Intel? look COMPLAIN 1919.90 1990-l1 f 10 !0 1910.11 1191.9E 199E-93 1993-91 1991.95 TOTAL :115.2000 PUSH PIOJICTB 2. Special Projects, 80adlec 6 Research A. Attics Plan - UPPIR Permit Applicalloe $3,000 276,000 156,000 75,000 15,000 110,100 120,000 B. Solids Treltaeat led Disposal Projects 1. Sledge Disposal Projects 116,000 610,000 10,080 25,000 50,006 $0,000 $0,000 $0,010 215,000 373,000 601,000 2. sludge Reese Projects 608,100 25,006 10,000 $0,000 50,000 $0,000 225,000 375,000 140,000 C. Beep Ouse Disposal Evaluation 509,000 2,221,004 $71,000 50,000 110,001 250,000 250,000 250,001 950,10 711,000 1,650,001 D. Air Quality Control Program 3,500,000 3,500,000 3,500,000 1. Air Toaice inveatory 102561 V/ TRIP) 100,000 1,975,000 175,001 1,000,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,600,080 1,110,500 2. VOC/IOU 1ACT Deloastretioa Progr i 250,000 600,000 50,001 100,000 150,000 111,100 156,000 610,000 100,000 3. ?store Projects 3,100,001 3,500,001 3,500,000 1. Cbeelcil Handling and Control laproveaeate 2$,000 100,400 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,010 10,000 S0,000 30,000 100,000 1. Central Laboratory DeVelopleat Program 125,000 55,000 25,000 25,000 5,000 11,000 $5,000 0. Water Cooservitioo Projects 1,220,000 70,000 100,041 100.000 101,004 100,000 470,000 750,000 I,220,000 1. later leolaeatlon lap and Spec Projects !00 000 100 000 t00 001 300 000 100 oil 101 000 101 000 100 Due !00 000 691-TO}AL - BPICIAL PIOJiC7D 1,265,000 l5 159 000 13/ 000 1 355 000 INS 000 1 115 000 910 000 !10 000 3 173 0A0 9 150 000 11 535 000 3. Igalpseot heat 32,550,000 J9 2!1 000 200 000 2 261 000 1 S00 000 1 300 000 1 S00 000 1 500 000 1 !f! 000 7 500 Off 15 TOT 000 L 707AL Join Voila CAPITAL 119VIIIHINTS A10 199 000 96E I/B BSS I01 )11 ASI 1011E2 000 II3 SOS 000 Ii/ 96S 000 9I 110 000 66 611 000 526 13! 000IRA 190 000 691 ITS 000t) 000 TOTAL VITA 18711) St ANNUAL III-LA CONS} COD}ADJU87KINT 1,230,371,209 104,341,451 103,422,000 1%610,763 111,662,601 111,471,055 80,992,111 517,221,237 121,607,511 126,129,iS1 299,111,600 1 Colu..Ls 1 1 1 1 t 4 1 t 1 1 1 C 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I COUNTY 6.1 en OX 0 o aX a couNit ea 1WY E x i CORE iOVI PXBNi aVOm}eX 7/1/90 I B9o-BI nuCle s mxn IYcxma xN ..T etnn Orr ma VEHICLES ..If. a0 iQ a TOOIA wm maxr aQ.tmaNT • 3u1nL W nx a xB m0es TmLL xo. of ee BTM axr sssu-n-00 55sex-.-00 555e3-x-00 llBea-N-Oa. lsse•-n-Oa R527-x-00 55560-x-oo lss a-x-00 ; NOERE 3tl. X.n.e•.Ont omc• I •.•ewwt auvw rt t..mU I so,Joo I....nn.l I..oOo B,e}s x2s00 s3,eo0 I 102.175 3310 olr.=t.r of nn.n=e Is,00a 1 ,fi6B 2220 1==ountlni is.Bm I is,BZO 3310 eurcNelnery.waouelnB 2.300 1•,S10 I 17,000 3380 Infa,utlen 9y etwe 25,000 ]Is.150 8.500 ISx.JJs I aOB,ses ]]IO ....r.l auw rin 4ndmt 24,000 1a.000 to.... 25,200 12.300 mo P1.m wmt...n•. 30,000 3e,000 :B,esa 17.200 t,aeo us.na I 3aso cm 1.=tmc n=uu1.. zaa,BBo s,3so .,oao a.vea I z}a,tso ]]50 Hoc Han lctl Meln[e n.n ce 81,100 Ie,3Bs t.e00 tOS,BBa ]J60 ilectrlcel Xa ntanenca 11.500 4.500 1i.53s Lfi35 IB.130 t.EBO I s1,ss0 ]]10 Inetr u en t. Xetnten•nce 23.fi00 1.133 B,B SO l..JIO I 81.135 3380 n..t...t eLOt QUIT. D,000 a,000 tz,uo u,,0O 24so0 I (It,tsO 3510 0cectur If T.=Mlul Err. S,,UO 15,700 16,200 ssxQ m.vu.I=• Je,xao xv.uo o,axQ ]vo rocs... i.m. • p.u.. B.uS I !.u! )S BO YEo w tory xm,s0o 3.350 210,010 3580 9awc• [on4o1 21.000 a,1S0 35.800 LfiOo 50.100 I laa.mo 3710 Olremor or ins ln••r me I 0 n2o It...me end O•.lEn 38,000 157,600 I 113,600 3190 cunit T.=tmn ......wt u•,mo 13,500 43.e75 tanoo 3,10o e,aa0 I 24S.e15 ____________ ____________ ____________ ____________ ------------ __________ __________ - ---------- _____________ TOTAL 10-9I REQUESTS 653,500 I58,900 59.320 326,e50 331.t10 44,140 EE..t20 0 ; 2,262,000 ........... ........... ......A.... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... "CORN 11.RLS CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND CLASSIFICATION OF BUDGETED PROJECTS BY RRVRNUE PROGRAM CATEGORIES SCHEDULE B-2 FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 Page 1 A B C D E F G REQUIRED REPLACBNNT IMPROVED ADDITIONAL REPLACEMNT IMPROVED ADDITIONAL BUDGET 6 TREATMENT CAPACITY a TREATMENT CAPACITY 1990.91 RECONSTR RECONSTR 1. New and Rebudgeted Major Projects A. Reclamation Plant 1 1 Headaorks No.2 E Plant N0.1, PI-20/P1.31 500,000 40% 601 200,000 300,000 2 Wastehauler Disposal 6 Sample Stu P1-27.1/2/3 500,000 50% 50% 250,000 250,000 3 Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15, P1-33 17,000,000 100% 17,000,000 4 Gas Handling Facilities, PI-34-1 7,000,000 201 801 1,100,000 5,600,000 5 Sludge Handling Facilities, Pi-34-2 8,000,000 501 501 4,000,000 4,000,000 6 Digesters 11-16, PI.34-3 7,000,000 100% 7,000,000 7 Rehabilitation of Digesters 7 R 8, P1-35-1 50,000 100% 50,000 B Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 6 10, P1-35-2 100% 9 Secondary Truk Expansion to 80 NGD, P1-36 600,000 100% 600,000 10 Primary Treatment 72 NGD Expansion, P1-37 1,000,000 100% 1,000,000 11 Misc. Modification, P1-38 1,000,000 1001 1,000,000 12 Security 6 Landscaping, PI-18-1 500,000 1001 500,000 13 Earthquake Work, P1-38-2 400,000 100% 400,000 14 Seismic Upgrading 6 Structural Work, PI.38-3 700,000 1001 700,000 15 Fuel System Improvements, R-033.1 200,000 100% 200,000 15 40 NGD Oxygen Activated Sludge A DAF's 1001 17 Belt Presses (4 Units) 1001 LB Solids Storage 14 Bins) 1001 19 Digesters: 2 E 110, Diameter 1001 20 Standby Power Generation 100% 21 12kv Electrical Power Distribution 100% 22 Electrification Project 200,000 100% 200,000 23 Raw Sewage emergency Bypass 1001 24 Remove Trickling Filters 163 100% 25 Central Air Compressor Station SOS 501 25 Misc. Projects 1 000 000 fi0E 20% 20R 600,000 200 000 200 DOD SUB-TOTAL - RECLAMATION PLANT 1 1 45,650,000 1 1 8,000,000 2,100,00D 35,550,000 CORP4 91.ILS CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND CLASSIFICATION OF BUDGETED PROJECTS BY DIVISOR PROGRAM CATEGORIES SCHEDULE B-2 FISCAL YEAR 1990.91 Page 2 A B C 0 A P G REQUIRED REPL11111T IMPROVED ADDITIONAL REPLACIMST IMPROVED ADDITIONAL BUDGET fi TREATMENT CAPACITY k TREATMENT CAPACITY 1990.91 RACONSTR RECONSTR B. Treatment Plant 2 1 Support Facilities and Site lmprovements a. Operations Building, P2-23.5.1 100,000 100% 100,000 b. Warehouse Building, P2-35.2 250,000 100E 250,000 c. Malntenace Building , P2-35-3 250,000 100% 250,000 d. Construction Management Office, P2.35.4 toOE e. Phase II Site and Security Improvements, P2.35.5 100,000 100E 100,000 2 Misc Modifus R Improvements to Facilities, P2.37 1,000,000 100E 1,000,000 3 Rehab Digesters I,J,E, P2.39.1 1,500,000 100E 1,500,D00 4 Rehab Digesters L,M, P2.39.2 100E 5 Rehab Digesters N,O, P2.39.3 100E 6 Process Control Improvements, PZ-10 250,000 50% 50% 125,000 125,000 7 Primary Treatment 24 RON Expansion, P2-41 100% A Secondary Treatment Expansion, P2.42 2,000,000 75% 25% 1,500,000 500,000 9 Electrification Project 1,000,000 t00% 1,000,000 10 Misc. Modifications, P2.43 500,000 100% 500,000 11 Earthquake Nark, P2.43.1 500,000 100% 500,000 12 Seismic Upgrading 6 Structural Work, P2-43.2 705,000 100% 705,000 13 Monitoring/Control System 2,000,000 50% 50% 1,000,000 1,000,000 14 fuel System Improvements, R-033.2 150,000 100E 150,000 15 Standby Poorer Generation 100E 16 Solids Storage: 2 Bins 100% 17 Additional 105 foot Digester 100% 16 Potable Water Distribution System 100E 19 Plant Water Pump Station 100E 20 Misc. Projects 1,000,000 601 20% 201 fi00,D00 11.01100 200,000 SUB-TOTAL • TRIATNBNT PLANT 2 ll 305 000 S 475 000 1 2,905,000 Z,925,000 C0121 11.ILS CAPITAL OUTLAY IIVOLVIIG IUD CLASSIPIGTION Of BUOGITID PIOJICTS By levels[ PIOGGI GTIGRIIS SCVIOULI B-2 115G1 YGI 1990-91 Pape 3 A 1 f 0 1 P G 1109111D 11PGf110T IIPOOVID ADDITIOOL IINCIIIR Itlt10YID 1001}101AL away A TIGTl11T GMCI}I A MARIIT CAPACITY 1910-91 IICOlSTI IICOVSTI C. fact ution plant Sites 1 Site A<guuiliol 5,000,000 50% $ot !,Soo,000 2,500,000 J leclaution Plant 1 Ion,000 501 50% 50,004 50,000 sul-TOTAL - )MISSION PLARS S.IAO 000 Z1550.000 1 550 000 D. laterploat aid Joist facilities I laterplut facilites, Id 1. 12D. Iolerplaot list 4,000,000 10% 20% 1001000 3,600,000 b. Iaterpliat Utility Chase 1,605,000 20% lot 200,000 100,010 c. Iadutrlal Water Line 11000,000 501 50% 500,000 SOO,DOO d. Oigsater Gal Lime 500,000 50% 50% 250,000 150,000 e. Coulllntical Cable 1161100 50% Set S0,600 50,040 2 Support facilities Ind Site loprasemeats a. Adtln. Building [)pia. 6 Mon. 1-0-4, J-7.5 1,010,000 101 I% 10% 101,000 I60,600 100,000 A. lelablCoae. fart. Lob it Pit 1 to Office, J-11-1 100% c. Central Laboratory, J-17 1,000,000 1001 4,000,100 d. Vrtehouleltlaiatesince aides. A oil loci, J-20 200,000 Sot Sol 100,000 100,000 e. operations Building, J-23-1 6 2 1,500,000 Sot sot 750,000 750,000 f. Persaaael Bulldiag at Pll 1, J-26 100,000 loot 100,000 9. Demolition of Support !sandbag at Plant 2, 347 3 central Geotrltiaa facility a. Igulpseot !repurchase, J-19A 5,000,606 Sot SOt 2,500,004 2,500,000 A. Itlislom larchase, J-193 C. Pilot I facility, J-194 6,000,000 Set 501 3,000,000 3,000,000 d. ?list 2 facility, J-19-2 1,000,000 Sot Set 1'000,000 4,000,000 1 Vista Gas flires,J-21, J-21A 650,000 1001 650,000 S Outfall A Booster Pup Statiols a. leplic men! of 71, 0at911 Sever, 3-22-1 (Land) 1,000,000 100% 11000,000 I. Replace Cattail go. 1 Lead Section, J-22-2 100% c. Rem Surge Tow go. 1, J-22-3 loot d. Tenp C12 Statioa for Oe[flll Do. 1 100% A. Second Mcharle Header GOBS -C- 70% 30% f. lnend 71' to Deep Peter With ISO. 0.11.11 100% 6 bflueot Noneter and tart PICility,J-24/211/219 500,000 1001 500,000 7 Preparatloa of Utility Atlas, J-25 500,000 1001 560,000 1 Telephone/feleietry/tlooitoriag upanaloa 500,000 50% Sol 250,000 250,000 9 tlalateauce Mager Calputer System 500,000 loot 100,000 11 Buahard Ieterphat Troop Replacement 10% 20% 11 lltetrlul Polar Systems lebabilitatioB Studies 300,000 100% 300,000 12 Sludge Disposal a. Compost Oenoaitratioa Plant Sol SOB A. Lead Agu/litioa Sot Sol c. Ludfill Oneloplest Pill, l Sot sit d. Compost facility sot Sol 13 list Prolecti 1.000 000 601 20% lot 600,000 200,000 200,000 SOB-TOTAL - IMPLAli A JOIN} 77.150 000 IS,100 000 E 100,400 20,550,ado SUB-}DIAL - nice PIOJICTp 91.d05 000 ll fiS 000 9 6ff.000 6I 515 000 COR14 91.ILS CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND CLASSIFICATION Of BUDGETED PROJECTS BY REVENUE PROGRAM CATEGORIES SCHEDULE B-2 YISCAL YEAR 199D-91 Page 4 A B C D A F G REQUIRED RRPLACEXNT IMPROVED ADDITIONAL RIPLACENNT INPROVRD REQUIRED BUDGET fi TREATMINT CAPACITY 6 TREATMENT CAPACITY 1990.91 RICONS7R RECONSTR 2. Special Projects, Studies fi Research A. Action Plan - NPDIS Permit Application 75,000 1001 75,000 B. Solids Treatment and Disposal Projects l Sludge Disposal Projects 25,0o0 loot 25,000 2 Sludge Reuse Projects 25,000 1001 25,000 C. Deep Ocean Disposal Evaluation 5o,00D 100% 50,000 D. Air Quality Control Program 1 Air Tonics Inventory (AB258B) 1,000,000 1001 1,000,000 2 VOC/ROG FACT Demonstration Program 50,000 1001 50,000 3 Future Projects 100% E. Chemical Handling and Control Improvements 10,000 1001 10,000 H. Central Laboratory Development Program 25,000 1001 25,000 1. Hater Conservation Projects 70,000 loci 70,000 J. Water Reclaaation RAD and Spec Projects ]Oo 0" 1001 100 OOo SUB-TOTAL - SPECIAL PROJECTS 1 1S5 000 ]1.355,000 3. Equipment Items 2,t62,o0D lot 601 301 226,000 ,157,000 679,000 TOTAL JOINT WORKS CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS 103,422,000 2E B01000 167 000 62 254,000 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 t 1 1 RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS WEDNESDAY, JUNE 13, 1990 - 7:30 P.M. I 4 F UPIU NO 91"^ - JT GIST 44M1x1M.G I:eS 1IAL PROCESSING URIC 5/12/9" i4LE ) t AFPOYI NVMYEP R9S ]? COUNTY SANITATION III5I9IC iS Of OMANGE COUNTY 8.,. �. CLAIMS 1'AID T5/F7/^3 POSTINF DATE 05/09/90 WARRANT H0. Vf NOUP AMOUNT DESCPIPIION 1C66PP AGKS COMPANY/IMAGER COPP. 4212.19 COMPUTER SOFTWARE loA"3 AT 6 T $420.43 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICE 1 C6624 SCHILTNNECHT MESSIECHNIK AG IS39.UO METER REPAIR 106625 LINCOLN CAPFE IS A INTERIORS $311.41 CARPET REPAIR 106626 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS. INC. $579.997.00, CONSTRUCTION PI-34-2 106627 AIR PRODUCTS 0 CHCHICAL INC. $15.296.90 O&M AGREEMENT - OXYGEN GEN SYSTEM M.0.8-9-89 TRAITS ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT $29.00 ASPHALT IU66P4 ALLWATER SERVICES $2.430.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICE 106630 ALTA SALES. INC.. 9595.07 INSTRUMENT PANT D 106631 ROPCO INC. R/OR AMERICAN SEALS 57.004.6P. GASKETS 6 SEALS IF4612 AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY 1365.P2 CAMERA m I06633 A-PLUS SYSTEMS 115.193.43 NOTICES 6 ADS m IRA634 APPLE ONE 14,122.70 TEMPORARY SERVICES n 136635 ARI20NA INSTPUNE.NTS COPP. $421.50 INSTRUMENT PARTS 106636 AUTO SHOP EOUI-MENT CO. $1,564.11 TRUCK PARTS 196637 THE AVEBURY GROUP 12.529.9P MECHANICAL PARTS 10663A RC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY. INC. $661.50 CABLE m 10f639 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $114,055.91 GRIT REMOVAL M.O.)-13-88 106640 BANANA BLUE. iRINT 51.593.19 PRINTING 106641 P.W. BABBITT AND ASSOC. $5.437.50 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PI-34-162,P2-37 W IV6642 PAXTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $1,597.35 LAB SUPPLIES I CE643 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $754.95 INSTRUMENT IP6644 DAMES SEN71E $413.48 MEETING EXPENSE D 106645 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS $206.68 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1- 106646 BPAGG CRANE L PIGGING CO. $1.562.09 CRANE RENTAL r 106647 PRINDEPSON CORP. $1,071.352.80 CONSTRUCTION 1-19-2 p 106648 BROWN 6 CALDWELL CONSULTING 5226.261.78 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19 3066.49 KATPINA BROWN 6 RUSSELL BROWN $975.00 LIABILITY GUINN I0A650 SIEVE DUBALO CONSTRUCTION CO. 5596.715.41 CONSTRUCTION 16-1-1B 11,6651 BURKE ENGINECRING CO. $569.69 ELECTRIC SUPPLIER IC6652 BUSH AN0 ASSOCIATES, INC. 314.5114.OG ENGINEERING SERVICES - SURVEYING IP6f53 GAMY G. STALED 51.320.44 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT I9A664 CAL-CHEM SALES 1149.35 RUBBER PRODUCTS 106655 CAL SOU7M ENUIPMENT CO. 5495.00 ENUIPMENT RENTAL 196656 CAL STPTE SEAL COMPANY 597.30 PUMP PARTS 106657 CALTROL . INC. 112.9P REGULATOR PARTS IL'f.65R CAL TYPE OFFICE MACHINLS4 INC. 149.94 TYPEWRITTER MAINTENANCE IOF659 CALIFORNIA FILTRATION $243.09 FILTER 116660 JOHN CAROLLO ENG. 410.545.1E ENGINEERING SERVICES - STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS 1966..61 JOHN CAROLLO CNGTNEERS 1221.914.4" ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-36.1`2-42,PI-20.1-9 IMFF62 CASTLE CONT6OLS. INC. $564.6P VALVE t 106663 CENTURY 3AFLTY INST. 1 SUPF. 12340P SAFETY SUPPLIES 166664 CHALLENGE. frt',APING L IND. SPIT $711.23 HARDWARE I06669 KELLY CHPISTENSEN $413.75 MEETING EXPENSE 106f66 CHROMALOY SALES FI.R29.11 ELECTRIC PART IC6667 CHROME CRAMKSMAFI. INC. S480.40 MECHANICAL PARTS n � w FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING. CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/U2/9P CAGE 2 n REPORT NUMBER 4145 1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY N CLAIMS .PAID 115/J9/90 POSTING DATE -15/09/99 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 146668 CHURP GROUP OF INS.. AS $6,148.64 LIABILITY CLAIN - 19f669 CORINNE CLCSSOU 5223.75 MEETING EXPENSE 196670 COAST AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION $399.74 TRUCK PARTS 106671 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT 181.50 FIRE EQUIPMENT I06672 COLICH AND SONS S347.395.50 CONSTRUCTION 7-11-I63 106673 C.I.E.S. . CO. . INC. 1660.L'0 PUMP PARTS 10F674 CONNELL G.M. PARTS / DIV• $259.99 TRUCK PARTS 106675 CON-VAT WESTERN EMPRESS 157.37 FREIGHT 106676 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. $4,822.31 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES n IC6677 CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS CO. $071.91 SAMPLE PARTS 1P667R CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPHICS 196.43 BLUEPRINTING m 106679 CONTAINERIZED CHEMICAL DISF'OSA $1.399.00 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL Z 1066PO CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS S1.801.95 BLUEPRINTING M.O.]-12-89 106681 CONTROL CABLES. INC. S34.76 TRUCK PARTS D 106682 COOPER INDUSTRIES. INC. $1,020,145.68 ENGINES M.O. 5-13-87,6-8-88 J-19A 106683 COORDINATED EQUIP. CO.. INC. 1500.0n TRUCK PARTS m 106684 R. E. COULTER CRANE RENTAL $1.186.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT fYl 106695 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC S1.774.94 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 3 lOF6P6 CRYSTAL CLEAR WINDOW RAINY. $535.25 WINDOW CLEANING 3t 136687 DANIEL$ TIRE SERVICE S487.86 TIRES W IP6668 TOM DAWES S355.93 MEETING EXPENSE 1 196689 DE ANZA COPPORATION S920.00 STORAGE FEES IC6690 MICHAEL R. DERLIEUK $19.129.33 DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF IPA691 DESKTOP GRAPHICS 8 DESIGN $24.00 PRINTING f— 106692 DEIURIK AND/OR CS CO. $3,732.38 VALVE PARTS 106693 OICMSONS $036.74 ELECTRIC PARTS O ID6694 DIFILIFPO ASSOCIATES $494.06 PRINTING 106695 DISCO PRINT COMPANY 14.561.67 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 106696 DORADO ENTERPRISES. INC. $7.216.87 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS A 166697 SUNNI EDWARDS CORF. 51.121.05 PAINT SUPPLIES 106698 EASTMAN. INC. 12.29R.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES (7 IOC699 W. H. EBERT CORP. $526,759.50 CONSTRUCTION 2-26-2.2-27 ~ 106700 EFFECTIVE VISUAL IMAGERY S476.53 PRESENTATION AIDS 1116701 ELECIRO NUMERICS INC. $2,497.72 INSTRUMENT PARTS IA67C2 EDWARD L. ELLIOT, JR. 12.7R2.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-33 106IP3 ENCHANTER. INC. 411.61.1n.00 OSCAR MONITORING M.0.3-/4-90 1P6704 FACILITIES SUPPORT CO. 1235.49 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES IPf7U5 JOHN S. FALKENSTEIN F.F. 14.425.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-40-20 1367C6 FARR SALES A SLRVICE 124T.Pfi FILTER IP67P7 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $169.25 AIR FREIGHT 10670A FERRELLGAS $22.95 PROPANE IVf709 FISCHER B FORTER CO. 1122,966.74 CHLORINATION PARTS /INSTRUMENT M.0.12-14-88 156710 FISHER SCIEN71FIC CO. $335.75 LAB SUPPLIES 106711 FLAT B VERTICAL CONCRETE 1197.SP CONCRETE CUTTING IT6712 FLEKIRLE SYSTEMS S33R.92 STRAINER 106713 FLUID HANDLING SYSTEMS S1.455.45 PUMP VI C FUND No 91^9 - JT blSi YO CKIb4 CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/F2/90 RAG[ 3 y.. REPORT NUMBER AC43 nj COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OR/NEC C0@1 T9 W CLAIMS PAID 95/09/90 POSTING DATE E05/09/90 WARRANT 00. VENDOR AMOUNT OESCII-TION 106714 FOXP ORO CO. / HAG SYSTEMS 12095.45 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 106719 GANAHL LUMBER CO. 5978.04 BUILDING MATERIALS I0E7I6 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. S1.8U0.54 TELEPHONE SERVICES IU6717 GEORGE LEECH 6 ASSOCIATES $541.25 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 106710 GIERLICH-MITCHELL• INC. $3.760.88 MECHANICAL PARTS 116729 GOLDEN COAST SAWDUST PR00. $3.925.00 SAWDUST 106720 GOOD HEART WILCOX CO. $25.29 PUBLICATION 106723 GRAPHIC CONTROLS $141.87 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 196722 GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION $420.36 STREET SWEEPING n 106723 DON GREEK A ASSOCIATES $1.111.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES - SURVEYING G"1 106724 GCORGE T. HALL CO. f2.485.1P SCRUBBER PARTS ITT 196725 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $312.93 GAUGE Z 106726 MARRIS DATA CONN.. INC. $299.63 COMPUTER REPAIRS O 106727 JAMES R. HARRIS $137.91 MEETING EXPENSE n 10672F HATCH A MIRK• INC. 32.925.91 MECHANCIAL PARTS 106729 HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW S55.00 PUBLICATION fTl 106730 WILLIAM D. HAUSER $426.0.1 MEETING MUSE 3 106731 S. A. HEALY CO. SIU2.603.59 CONSTRU Get ON PI-05-I 106732 HIL71• INC. $25.66 WASHER 106733 HOERBIGER C.Y.S. CALIF. • INC. $110.13 MECHANICAL PARTS 106734 HOUSE OF BATTERIES 596.65 BATTERIES I 106735 R.S. MUGHES CO.. INC. $3.469.91 PAINT SUPPLIES n 106736 HUN71NGTON BEACH BURDEN STAMP $410.44 RUBBER STAMPS r 106737 IND INDUSTRIES 51.529.22 ELECTRIC PARTS F- 10673A ISC,O. INC. $14•025.00 ENGINE PARTS IP6739 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL f102.747.37, FERRIC CHLORIDE H.O.11-08-89 G I06740 INDUSTRIAL METAL SUPPLY CO. $1,168.28 BASIN RAILS 106741 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1,246.39 CONNECTORS ti 106742 INFILCO DEGREMONT• INC. $9,198.06 MECHANICAL PARTS .� 106743 INGRAM PAPER $1.383.30 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES f") 1^6744 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. 51.925.31 EQUIPMENT RENTAL ti 106745 J L W SCIENTIFIC 51.530.72 LAB SUPPLIES (A I06746 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $897.64 INSTRUMENT PARTS 106747 JENSEN TOOLS A ALLOYS $154.53 TOOLS 306748 JOYCE OFFICE PRODUCTS $60.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES 106T99 NAILECN-S COMPUTER SUPPLIES f1.5B9.33 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1P6750 HAMAN PEARINGS B SUPPLY 567.64 FITTINGS IC6751 KANER COMPANY 510AB.49 HARDWARE 106752 THE KEITH COMPANIES 5416.75 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-3565-36 116753 BENNO. INC. $780,115.70 CONSTRUCTION 5-34-2 106754 MIFWIT PACIFIC CO. 1368.257.60- CONSTRUCTION PI-20 116755 RING NEAPIIIG. INC. $1.828.53 MECHANICAL PARTS 1P6756 KNOB INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIFS 5197.66 TOOLS 1067.17 MARTIN KORDICM. SP $2.550.0P. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 1-14-IB 10675E L P C TIME SENVICF $95.IIO TRUCK PARTS 106759 L.e. LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS 5295.PR PUMP PARTS L . ri � J FUND 110 9194 - JT UIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING D47C 5/ni/9b PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 D COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY r CLAIMS PAID 0511,9/9G POSTING DATE G5/09190 WARRANT NO. VENOOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 106760 L16PERT ASSOCIATES OF $179.82 ELECTRIC PARTS 106761 JOUN LISEF PUMPS. INC. $36.13 FREIGHT 106762 LORAIN PRODUCTS $1.194.65 SERVICE AGREEMENT - RELIANCE TONER I"FPS MRS 9293.31 PNOTOORAPHIC SERVICES 106764 RACOMCD SIR7.20 SERVICE AGREEMENT 106765 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS. INC. 62.574.51, MECHANICAL PARTS 106766 M C M ASSOCIATION 61.358.93 MEMBERSHIP 116767 NARVAC ELECTRONICS 6144.26 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 6 106769 MATT - CMLOR. INC. $2.172.92 MECHANICAL PARTS n 306769 RETENA $58.85 INSTRUMENT m 106770 MCKENNA ENGR. A EQUIP. $5.121.41 PUMP PARTS m IV6771 MCRASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. SI.053.02 PUMP PARTS OIOCT72 MICROAGC COMPUTER f12.U84.09 OFFICE EQUIPMENT n IVA773 MICROAGE COMPUTER STORES $4,059.81 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 106774 MICROSOFT QUICK BASIC 4.5 $320.94 COMPUTER SOFTWARE UPGRADE 106775 HILTON ROY COMPANY $294.33 PUMP PARTS m 106776 MONTGOMERY LARAPATORIES $1,600.75 LAB SERVICES 3 106777 ADORE PRODUCTS CO. $1.512.55 TRANSDUCER 106778 NOTION INDUSTRICS. INC. 6816.94 MECHANICAL PARTS 3! 106779 NAT. COUNCIL FOR ED. ON INFO. $225.40 REGISTRATION 00 106780 NATIONAL FIRE'PROTECTION ASSN $33.50 PUBLICATIONS 1 106701 NATTONAL PLANT SERVICES. INC. 697.499.2t CONSTRUCTION 5-27 1067P2 MEAL SUPPLY COA f450.66 COMPUTER PART 1 r 306,783 GUST K. NEWPERG CONST. CO. $2.985.437.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-33 r IBATb4 NEWARK ELECTRONICS 554.35 COMPUTER PARTS 106785 CITY )F NEWPORT PEACH $4.O9 WATER USF.ACE 07 106786 NORTH SUPPLY $58.36 T06LS — 116787 OFFICE PAVILION/INTERIOP RES. $43.694•75 OFFICE FURNITURE J-7-4 y 1067MF OR SYSTEMS CO. 628.541.36 CHLORINE M.0.2-I4-90 S I06799 OLYMPIC CHEMICAL COMPANY f2.9A7.24 CHLORINE M.0.2-14-90 TC6790 ORANGE BEARING. INC. $182.51 MECHANICAL PARTS 106791 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. 9190.19 TRUCK PARTS N 106792 OPANGE COUNTY CPEMICAL CO. A1.685.4P HYDROCHLORIC ACID 106793 ORANGE SPORTING GOODS 3191.24 LINE MARKER IC6794 ORANGE VALVE 6 FITTING CO. $1.364.84 FITTINGS 196795 OSCAR-S LOCK L SAFE f111.56 LOCKS 106796 OXYGEN SERVICE 5755.96 SPECIALTY CASES 166197 COUNTY OF ORANGE $296.06 MAPPING 11679R COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 14.926.67 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION I06799 COU47Y SANITATION DISTRICT $4,420.47 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE 1FCROD PACIFIC PARIS $5.454.54 INSTRUMENT PARTS IIARCI PACIFIC PROCESS CQUIFNENT.IOC. 61.174.5V MECHANCIAL PARTS I1.69P2 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. 61.0H7.09 SAFETY SUPPLIES 1P6RR3 PACIFIC BELL 6706.54 TELEPHONE SERVICES If6RP4 PACIFL CELLULAR 4153.57 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 1P6P95 PAK WEST $333.20 JAME TORIAL SUPPLIES t , � i FUND NO 9I99 - JT LIST W06NING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/62/90 PAGE 5 •� REPORT NUMBER AP43 3? COUNTY SANITATION 0I57RICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY i lJl CLAIMS PAID 05/99/93 POSTING DATE 05/09/90 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIITION I?6An6 PEERLESS WIPING NAR RIALS CO. $165.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 166k97 PERFORMANCC SEMINAR OUP f165.00 REGISTRATION T 106809 POLSTENTIVFERP MEASUREMENTSIS . IN . itl r256.81 SAFETY 106R09 DOLT ENTERPRISES. INC. f990.25 SAFHTY SUPPLIES 136AII POWER INC. T2tl$191.89 POLYMERS M.0.1-10-90.8-9-89 / 106012 HAROL SYSTEMS 3191.89 ENGINE PARTS 106A18 NARBLD PROJECTS SE ICE f36.00 ICE I06Pl3 THE POREILLE SOLUTION CO. $9$140.70 PUBLICATIONS INSPECTION M.0.8-10-08 IC6R15 ' FEND OR ELECT PUP LOCATIONS s190.1U PUBLICATIONS ➢ 206816 P.T.M. ELECTRIC MOTORS fI3602.39 MEETING[ MOTOR R¢PAIR L1 106816 RAPID RAT 3$82.51 SAFETY EXPENSE Z 106818 RED WING SHOES 000.00 POSTAGE SHOES [7 106518 REMOTE METER PESCTTI NG SYSTEM f3 r560.00 ELECTRIC ➢ 106P.19 THE REPUBLIC WER SUPPLY CO. $307.95 ELECTRIC LSUPPLIES ARTS In SE2O REPOLI) POWER TRANSMISSION GRSHO E101.95 MECHANICAL PARTS 106821 MILTON S. WATSON 8 GERSHON f69.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.6-I1-86 3 106923 MIL TON ROBERTS i513.22 CONSTRUCTION TIONUPENSE 19FP23 J. R. RUCKING CORP. 3966.$35.03 FREIGHT J-17 101825 ROOT TRUCKING f35.01 FREIGHT 106826 ROSSAO RIFE INC.NILBE f2.69R.06 BATTERIES PARTS 306826 SAP WIFE I f1$265.60 BATTERIES 1 106M2T SAFETY-NEE EN CORP. E265.60 PARTS CLEANER 106029 SANTA AEA AG CO. MOTORS $395.6P ELECTRIC MOTOR 106029 SANT4 RE LER CO. .200.09 BAGS r 106831 THE SCR OENGI CO. 35.813.76 ENGINCONSTRUCTION SERVICES IOG031 SCHULERCOA T DESIGNING CORP. E2$3.932.62 CONSTRUCTION P1-27-112 CJ I06P32 SEA COAST DESIGNS f3.932.62 TOOLS HORIPM¢NT ' 1O6P33 SEARS. ROEBUCK R CO. f95.60 TOOLS IPFP39 S.F. $EQUIP.I NO f539.10 TOOLS EXPENSE 19F835 SEWER EQUIP.SCO.ECURITY OF AMEPICA 32.695.00 TOOLS ("l 1968J6 SHAMROCK SECURITY f911.0P TOOLSSECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS y 196R3T SHAMROCK SUPPLY E859.50 SOIL IC683A SMITH-EMERY CO. E5 r910.06 SOIL TESTING N.0.6-19-89 I/6P39 SOFT WAREHOUSE 312B.R0 COMPUTER PARTS 106P91' $0. COAST 4C0 STALI TT i1.350.10 APPLICATION NCES 106891 SO. CALIF. COASTAL SONWATERCO. l2S4.090.00 POWER ADVANCE 106092 SOUTHERN CALIF. FOISOM C f9.191.93 DIESEL 196P93 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $2,161.25 OFFICE EUEL 1n6P99 SPACCSAVER DSYSTEMS,RINKING INC. s2r161.P5 OFFICE G WIPMENT I06P95 STAMEN[TTS DRINKING WATER flr688.57 ENGINEER WATER It-ID6N96 STAMEN 2. $PASSOLY P.E. i5$636.93 TOOLS 38RYIC85 J-19-2,P1-33,Pt-37 11684R STAR UMM TOOL 6 SUPPLY CO. f6T6.93 TOOLS 106849 SUMMIT POWER f1.232.50 JANITORIAL 10F953 SUPER ONTI ENTAL AIR UCTSTOOL $858.93 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 106851 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL, INC. E851.23 TOOLS IO6A51 T 8 C INDUSTRIAL CONTkOL$• INC flr291.23 ELECTRIC PARTS 1. j - FUND NO . 9199 - JT DIST WOP01N6 CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/12/9F PAGE 6 REPORT NUNPEP 4F83 n COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Cn [le1HS PAID OS/Ir9/98 POSTING DATE 05/09/90 WARRANT 40. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 10-852 TALIN TIRE, INC. $2.263.34 TIRES IL6653 THE TEFNIPI COMPANY S124.19 OFFICE SUPPLIES IS6054 THEO-TELLO-NUSCH. INC. $751.DU CHLORINE STEM REPAIRS IVSP55 THERMO ANALYTICAL. INC./MORPAL ITS.-0 LAB SERVICES 3061,56 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE, INC. S16.940.44 TRAFFIC COPTROI. DIST 3 IP6857 TRAVEL TRAVEL $4.432.00 TRAVEL SERVICES M.0.6-14-87 ]O6P58 TRUCK B AUTO SUPPLY. INC. S878.81 TRUCK PARTS 19AP59 J.G. TUCKER A SON. IF'C. $575.31 INSTRUMENT PARTS 10696P TWINING LABORATORIES OF _ $8,242.75 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-L4-89 3. 106F61 UNOCAL $241.R5 UNLEADED GASOLINE m 10686E UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $70.99 PARCEL SERVICES IT 106P63 VWR SCIENTIFIC $1.396.50 LAB SUPPLIES 2 106864 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $5,780.28 FITTINGS p 106865 VALLEY DETROIT DIESEL S837.50 ENGINE REPAIRS n 346666 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $486.41 SAFETY SUPPLIES _ r 1^6P67 RICHARD W. VON LANGEN S349.16 MEETING EXPENSE m 106860 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $710.75 REPAIR MANUAL 3 106P69 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 31.352.57 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES T^.6P70 JOHN R. W4PLES 3533.39 DOOR CONTROL CONSULTANT 3t 106871 WARPINGTON $115.00 INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION 00 106PT? WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY $14,642.94 CAUSTIC SODA H.0.8-9-89 146P73 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. S325.16 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES IB6A 74 WILSUR-ELLIS COMPANY $4.942.63 INSECTICIDE 196875 JAMES A JUDITH WILSON $365.74 LIABILITY CLAIM r. 106PT6 WOROPERFECT COPP. $1,845.93 COMPUTER SOMARE 106877 XEROX CORP. S5.045.28 COPIER LEASES r p 109818 MORRIS PING SRII.23 MEETING EXPENSE 106879 ZIEBAPIH AND ALPER $7211834.10 CONSTRUCTION PI-34-1 (n ----------------- TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 05I09/9p 312.758.570.01 '-I om r N r f r ` � 6 J NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/02/90 PACE 7 ' REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY i CLAIMS PAID 05/09/90 POSTING DATE 05/09/90 V SUMMARY AMOUNT /2 OPEN RAND f 663.83 /2 CAP PAC FUND 627.797.43 83 OPEN FUND 16.975.22 /5 DPW FUND 1,446.71 85 CAP PAC FUND 822,360.63 86 CAP FAC FUND 1,175.25 17 OPER FUND 3,878.28 07 CAP FAC FUND 394,805.48 y 811 OPEN FUND 51.26 L1 III CAP FAC FUND 318.01 Z 814 CAP PAC FUND 451,350.10 1566 CAP FAC FUND 66,689.26 y 0667 DPER FUND 2.045.60 f7614 DPER FUND 9.14 JT DPER FUND 399,974.42 f71 COST 9,572,462.48 3 SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FUND 12,4L7.85 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND 384.149.04 CO f 12,758,570.01 n r r 0 z N I J W� FUPD UO ^1'+` UT ••IST 'WURPII:G CIIIVI. IPOCESSINP U(IL 9/17/4+ fArr I RI PORT NUP.OEI Al 15 CO CPUNIY SAN17AIIAN DISINICIS Of OPANTL COUNTY CLAIR$ 141D +'6/P3/11 POSTING DATE e5/23/91 B-• �VAAPINT 110. VLN4OR AMOUNT •JE.^•CRIpTIRN I0A028 A-1 rprPESS DELIVFRY SFRVICI 321.31 FREIGHT 1/f929 AUII Am. INC. 399.20 INSTRUMENT PART 1 T4010 AT S T tiTT.i3 TANG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 106931 ACADEMY OF DEFTMSIVF DRIVING 3670.JC DRIVER TRAINING 19032 ACCUAABS RESEARCH♦ INC. stab..), LAB SERVICES _. I ,P 033 JAC AOVA6CF- 606UO i66.26 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES n 101934 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. S?53.566.3P CONSTRUCTION PI-34-2 Y' IC693} __ AERO TECH SUPYr YS. INC. 3IT466.25 - AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY I ; 10693E AIRCRAFT NCATIOG R ELECTR ICAL i49.SI REFRIGERANT PARS IJ69 3T AIR COLD SUPPLY INC. 352F.4R DANAGREEME I,n 306938 TIN PRODUCTS i u.v4UL INC. L15.295.3U AUTO AGREEMENT - OXYGEN CEN SYSTEM M.0.8-9-89 1x6939 LCA"sl NG AS$OC IAIF S/PLI STA if"-- Yl 29l.72 AUTOMOBILE LEADERS I, I0L941D SAFETY SUPPLY AMERICA $12.64 SAFETY SUPPLIES pp 106941 ALFH16A2 SLS58.10 PROPANE �a 1A6442 _PLLYASTf SENVICF -- - -� - -f F.fi 34.91i - - -- VACUUM TRUCK SERVICE - - -- L.1 1.694S AMERICAN DISTRICT TCLE6RAPH $553.16 SERVICE AGREEMENT ; 106944 ROOCO INC. 3/04 AMERICAN SEALS 34.566.9E CASKETS 6 SEALS I9A945 __ ARFR IE6I(-iIDNNiC3�"iDEvtr"-- ' - -- AR4.65 CAMERA P' 106946 AMERICAN VULRAN CORP. $9.E22.77 MECHANICAL PARTS '+• If.6947 AMF.AITECH 397.75 COPIER LEASE p� 1�1694R - - - CI TV DF-R11AHUR - -- -- -- - - ------ - $1.235,401.44 - -� SUER REHABILITATION M.0.12-10-86 196949 APPLE ONE S1.119.20 TEMPORARY SERVICES ^i1 196059 ARATU SERVICES. INC. $7.671.59 UNIFORM RENTALS -' 1Vf951 _ . . ... .. N1C1i0L15 Ap HDNTES. S74I.91 _. _. _...__ .. MEETING EXPENSE :-� 11F952 AR120NA INSTRUMFNTS CORP. 3127.50 INSTRUMENT PARTS 106953 _ ARROW TRUCK BODIES R EQUIPMENT _ $2.196.75_ TOOL BOX 1 � 194954 - - A3SOtlitED SOIL,-6N6INEENIN6 -- - T19.516.09 _ BOIL TESTING 11.0.6-14-19 106955 ANSI $710.00 REGISTRATION ' (p IlA95A FALCO4 DISPOSAL SERVICE $167.592.90 GRIT REMOVAL X.O.7-11-BB 04967 P.Y. RAR617I ANU ABU. - - i5.59n.66 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PI-14,P1-74-2,02-37 IO69SH R. BATEMAN S9PS.Oi DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 1V6959 PAATfP SCIr11TIf IC Pp000CT5 32.59H.Rr. LAB SUPPLIER 1i14960 NOHr.RT DCEN.NTLLfLAN FROST C {R i57.378.66 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-34.5-H3 �N 1069A1 PTOCYCLE 349.P5 PUBLICATION y 1060.62 HOWARD BLCVINS t29'6(1 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 1Ef963 HOW CASCADC OFFICE F06DUCTS $164.05 OFFICE SUPPLIES .� 10/Pf4 POLSA RADIATOP. SERVICE 14.337.S2 RADIATOR REPAIRS 1 106965 PO"•A-RUES 3263.44 TRUCK PARTS 1CF966 DOYLE ENGINtr A1NK CORP A1.311.0i ENGINEERING SERVICES 1^6967 BROWN i CALDWELL i2.559.15 LAB SERVICES 13L96P BROWN L CALLWELL CONSULTING 8138.736.IR ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19 16f9L9 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. 1194.6% ELECTRIC SUPPLIES ICA91l RUSH AND ASSOCIATES. INC. 3fi.552.CR SURVEYING SERVICES RES 88-71 1-16971 _ GARY 6. $TRIED t257.47 PEITY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 1Of517 Br-DRnDUt TF MA•:AGIKLNF, INF. 3P.540.91 FERROUS CHLORIDE H.0.4-12-89 1A(973 CPI COMP. / SUPHIT SOLU710115 32.245.PJ MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT to e � w ■!/ FUND Nb 91>9 - JT UI ST MWxINn CAPITAL " PROCES S N RtC 9/1T/9? GRGF 2 P &UNER AP93 COUNTY SA417AIION DISTRICTS OF IRA COUNTY C61N3 PAID 05/2314d POSTING OAIC ^ II5/23/93 ---"- IN 1i -WARRANT NO. VENVOR AMOUNT OESC7IIT1ON 136-74 CS COMPANY f3a61.07 VALVE PARTS 106975 CAL-GLASS FOR PISEAPCH9 INC. f2.0O3.17 LAB SUPPLIES I AL976 . '.. . ..CA LTR OL'__ INC: ._-.."-.. _. .. .. . . . &3741S;7 J' _ ... - __. . REGULATOR PARTS. .. ... _ "_..— L! 10l977 CALIF. RUSIUESS LAW INS71TUIL S695.0P REGISTRATION ..� 1IF978 CALIFORNIA FILTRATION S1.162.93 ENGINE PARTS 196979 "- 'C4ROLLO=ODYLE FNOINFFP3-- "-'-" SIOi115.11 ENGINEERING SENV1@E8'RES 89-122 106900 LCAMDPE P. CATACUTAN S344.60 MEETING EXPENSE 106981 CHALLENGE ULARING 4 IND. STEP 5766.94 MECHANICAL PARTS . ...... .IOf98P ' _... -----__GTOPGE"ATTNARFTTE--_____.__ ._.. —...-356EG44 MEETINGEIRRN88 ' -___.. 6 D Inf903 CHEW SERVICE $55.52 LAB SUPPLIES „� 1A69R4 CHEVPON U.S.A.♦ INC. $14,290.06 UNLEADED GASOLINE m 106905 _. "CRROME'CRANR5114fTi INC7--___ -_... _...1870:6D_. -_ ... MECHANICAL PARTS -... .. _.. .. _. _. _.-. . v Z 196986 COLICM AND SONS f363.647.73 CONSTRUCTION 7-IL-11 o n I06967 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF $3.265.13 FITTINGS I36900 ._. __ _._CONNELL-G-.R: 'PART97 Ui T.___....__...___.._..._._.__199:16 _____.___—____.TOUCH PARTS IOf9P9 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. 16,125.65 ELECTRICAL PARTS .-1 10f990 CONSOLIDATED FAEIGHTMAYS $301.54 FREIGHT 3 9G 991_..._. . _._.. - . {2. .5 .._._..__._.__.__. CHLORINE N.ua6-1149 .- . . 10I.992 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS f1.034.15 INSTRUMENT M 0.7-12-89 ,•30 1U6993 CONTROL DATA CORP. ,349.99 INSTRUMENT PART 1 D6994 . ... . _.-.-➢DNTpOLCD.___ ._. ___._.__.______ ___.___. _._._--3S4G:J6.._.__.____.._..._ MECHANICAL-PART& .. I 1P6999 COOPER INDUSTRIES. INC. $1,425,092.60 ENGINES H.0.5-13-67.6-8-88. J-19A 1 P6996 COORDINATED EQUIP. CO.. INC. $250.00 TRUCK PARTS . ; f00997 ""Cost A'-MESA-TUT O'SUPFL4___�.__. ___..__.__ - ;Ii700:7d . _.....-_ _._-__..TRUCK PARTS ...". _ _._ .. . ....._.. 10699E COUNTY.WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $652.86 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 106999 CRANETEN S366.30 TRUCK PARTS 107600 . .... - ..CRAVEW; BARGE& 6"CbAPARY___.__.__.___..__ .._....17i590:00 -._ "—.._LIABILITY CLAIM 10701'1 CAL WATER 5287.44 RENTAL EQUIPMENT I67PO2 LARRY CURTI TRUCK S EQUIFMEN7 S23.940.00 SINCE REMOVAL H.0.4-13-88 101003 . .. ONE. INC. -_.. ._____.... .. _ . . . 9914.15. ...___._ . . . - VALVE PARTS 107004 DE AN2A CORPORATION $150.05 EQUIPMENT RENTAL �.� 137205 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES SI.S07.6S PRINTING 217,106 DISCO PRINT tONWAWY-"-" ' "-- ' 11410.36 - -" -"' - OFFICE EQUIPMENT - - !• 147W47 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. S735.79 PAINT SUPPLIES I' 1071.06 D-VALS SALES f542.55 FITTINGS if r5u9 F.I.L. INSTRUMENTS. INC. 1446.41 INSTRUMENT I11 IPTLIS E•ISECO-CPL 52.350.+0 OCEAN SAMPLING 1 107011 LASIPAN. INC. 151A.56 OFFICE SUPPLIES j.i 107612 ECUSV$TF.MS LNG1Urr AING E ANALV f4.51O.J0 6GEAK RESEARCH l 107i13 FFFLCIIVF VISUAL IMAGERY $22.04 SLIDES 117414 ILICI AIR $466.18 MECHANICAL PARTS 19Y 15 ELECfPUN1C PALINCIMP CO. 1390.•1e IRA" 4.j 107116 RP.' SCRVICY COMPANY $123.76 VALVE PARTS 107E 11 FACILITIES SUCPOP1 P0. 13).-If SMALL HARDWARE 107 1P Ma09DALL FA IARES 1354.:f DEFERRED COMP DISTRISUftDW I.�I IPIPI9 JOIN 6. FALKENSTEIN P.E. 13.75d.09 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-4, J-20 W .FUND NO 9111 Jl OICT HONKING CAPITAL FPOCESSINT• DATE 5/mg, TAOI 3 W REPORT NUMBER AFAT I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANCC COUNTY t ILO 11 - CLAIMS LAID 99/P3/97 POSTING OAIE PS121/46 :•� WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DCSCRIPTIUN • 107924 FARR SALCS A SERYICF fB.580.0; FILTERS U• TC21 FEDFR AL CMPNCSR CORP. 1112.50 AIR FREIGHT 1.) .. lO1t;52i....._ ..F13t11ER i' FD4ICe-00._ _._._.. _ ... _ ..__.. .. _. . .. 0PS.0t _ _.. - ._. . - INSTRUMENT PARTS r� 147323 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. 11455 1e LAB SUPPLIES . 117024 FLAT A VERTICAL CONCRETE 6856 50 CONCRETE CUTTING ti;l 2E- - -" --- SCRUBBER PART n 167026 FORD AEROSPACE A COHM CORP. $19.941 5A REFUND USER ME OVERPAYMENT 1 • IU702T FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA �• $30T29 PHOTO SUPPLIES 1d2R _ ' -_-FD) N;ERFpIEfS _ SAFETY COHSGLTINC -- 197229 FOXBORO-CO. / NAG SYSTEMS $1,324.64 FITTINGS 107036 A.F.A FREY 3105..00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION I6;hJl VALVES i •+ 107932 CITY OF FULLERTON f3q.91 WATER USEAGE 107033 GTE EDUCATION SERVICES. INC. S48.61 AMSA BULLETIN BOARD a ' 151634 GAIIANi ENNRE'R t6:---_ _ ._-- .. fill:$I _.__--_ mimo R _ -�' 1D7035 GARDNER LITHOGRAPH $189.50 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT .i 107036 GENERAL CHEMICAL 67.R68.06 CHEMICALS _. ..-.___._-_ ld -DENTRAC'IEEFPRDNE"CS:' .---......i�.S$I.AT--_—_.--..TELEPHONE SEiV[CES . 347038 FL04ENCE L. GEPDFS $471.20 MEETING EXPENSE 197039 _ _ __ GIFRLICN-MIICMELL♦ INC. _111,342.04 _MECHANICAL PARTS jh;6 OLD MWE ST N LAMAT; -316R.bj- REFUND USER PEE SERVICE12Nf' i �. 1 107N1 SO Al WESTERN ASSOCIATES OM 61.890.00 STREET SWEEPING SERVICES u • 107DAi OON GREET t ASSOCIATES fEA.318.00 SURVEYING SERVICES RER 88-)? ., I37crl_ . . .. ---dEARiu i�dREEdTd.: INC-. ...— iG6T2b.S7. ._ .___—.rRuGR eAArS . .._ _ ._._ 107019 OANSON-LORAN CNf RICAL CO. $1.210.55 REFUND USER TEE OVERPAYMENT 107C45 FRED A. HARPER 61.995.00 DEFERRED COMP R[STRUUTION u 11-1646 NEAR INd;DN 1N60191W-RCiS;TEf...._..___.._—_.._.....__;f6S:2$ Y;LLVL PARTS__.. __._... . ._._..__.___.___...._..—. .. I. 107347 HATCH L KIRK. INC. lb.310.15 ENGINE PARTS I 10709q NOCRNIGER C.V.S. CALIF. . INC. 6415.04 _ COMPRESSOR PARTS DEFERRED COMP DIS'IRItIRI011 107E2• HOUSE OF BATTERIES 61.138.99 BATTERIES i 1 1 "51 STEVEN J HOVEY f7E.95 MEETINC EXPENSE 31) 52 _ R:S.-HU6RES Me INt.-------_. 62:b26.9d__.. _ .. __.__..... ..Unre SUPPLIES _.__..... .. __. .. ..__ ._ 107FS3 CITY OF PONTINCT04 ROACH 115.910.50 WATER USGGE .A 147454 HUNTINGTON SUPPLY _ $114.9.9 HARDWARE _I0TJ5B ]CC INSTNIHU N1 - - - - Li.IS METER REPAIRS 107P56 TVA INSINCERE f7.115.30 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-I)-I IA7•157 IMIL014L WEST CHEMICAL 119.361.51 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-08-89 13705E INCON SI tfMS. INC. - IR56.19 - ENGINE PARTS 107059 IMINUSTRIAL 3TSIEMS. INC. 670.30 ELECTRIC PARTS IL796O INVUSTPIAL IMRLADCO PRODUCTS 3LG53.79 CONNECTORS �.� 1e1961 Iw,OAN PATIO 62,129.35 PAPER Q.A. 1O736T INSIEr P:STE C/O CAP. PFFOPTS f259.00 SUBSCRIPTION L; 197:E3 INfEPNATIONAL SENSOR TE[M. $4.957.55 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1CV64 TRVINE RANCH WATEP DISTRICT $1A.94 WATER USEAGE 107965 ;kFAT WESTERN SANITARY SOFT'• $1,516.60 JANITORIAL SERVICES !•1 R FUND 4141 Jr UI41 WOPKINP CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE illr/97 PAGE 4 C REPORT NUMUER A143 ^ C DUNIY SANIIAI ION UIS7RICTS OF ORANGE COOK TY o?.. . . _. . .. _ .. . ....... ...._..l LAtns AAIU 55)2S)N•� PD6t tNC DATE ii5lz8lg6..... ....._ . _. ...... .... ........—a WARRANT NO. VENDOP AMDUNT OFSCRIPTION 107066 A.F. JOHNSON COMPANY $97.26 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 107u67 GCRALO JONES $841.25 MEETING EXPENSE 1 ' lu1AbR. ...._' . JOYCE OTFIEt FROOUCI3 .. .. ..._._ ._._ .._ . ... ._., 8451:75 . . ...__._.__.oPPite sUPPLA9 .. -. . ._... _._ ...__ : 107P69 KALLELN•S CDKPUTCP SUPPLIER i410.91 COMPUTER PARTS 107.171 KAMAN BEARINGS A SUPPLY $41.29 FITTINGS ._._ 1isl'M . . KANEh'tbilPANY ._ _...... 1 ... .. . . .. 5999:41 . ... .__ . . 3YioLs - .... ..__ � 167072 XEEN-NUT AHPASIVE CO. $499.38 TOOLS n 1r7g73 KIND OFARING. INC. 5702.U2 MMKICAL PARTS IP7014...._—......'..RNUI-INDUSTRI'AL '3UP'PLIC3__..__-_.. _. ... _iYi:d'1 _... "Us .. . - _.... 107U75 MARTIN ROAMER, SP $2,475.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 1-14-1 107U76 H.V. LAWMASTER A CO., INC. 17.234.50 SOIL TESTING ..137iM ......._.,....LE.Eo3'TMORTNRtiP-.. . .__.__._.....__.... ._.....__.._.__._ _. -'311}75i .. .. _......- PNinumEff suPPLi@s .".. . . . .._".. 147970 LIEHEPT ASSOCIATES OF 5674.44 ELECTRIC PARTS 107179 WILLIAM J. LLOYD $89.25 MEETING EXPENSE Ip7YOC.-._...___.LOCXL`IFGERC7_..... 56:dii LAPCo PE@ . .. ... ......_. 107J81 LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION $140.629.37 POOLED EMISSIONS ESTIMATING PROGRAM N.O. 12-13-89 107082 A.J. LYNCH CO. $1,276.02 JANTTORIAL SUPPLIES . WIFS._. .......____. -RoUr AA'iNl.-....__.. .._...._.. ._...s}:IiS:ad- ....._'.-- -----3eaviGE AGREEMENT........ ..__ . ....... ......_.. i I07L84 MPS SBO.54 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 197385 MALCOLM PIRNIE , INC. S2,735.97 ENGINEERING SERVICES FAA'QAC- lnAORIC3___._._. .____.__......._._3St..@5.....___-._.___..__.. INSTRUMENT suePLles. . . . .. ..._ .. - _..__. 1071p81 KETCMA 111,038.39 INSTRUMENT REPAIR a.1 10708P MCMASTFR-CARP SUPPLY CO. $752.71 BUILDING MATERIALS .... 1D7TN4 .. . "" 'MEA3URL NERT'tb1iTR GC-3i3:lAi:..__.__.._.___._..._..... . .41:I}4:}'F..... .�..._ _.._....._ INSTRUNENr PA@Y3 . .. . . . .. 10799g THUMPS R. KELTON 1187.74 MILEAGE EXPENSE 107091 KICROAGE COMPUTER $5,213.69 OFFICE EQUIPMENT .. 10642 11IGRDAGC LaNPU1FR 'S'TONET—__.... _...__._.—_. .ORRICE RQDIPHRNT'._. ..... .. . . . ....__..! 107093 PILLIPORE AND/OP WATERS $1.228.44 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 167194 011CHELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. 5102.0U PUBLICATION 107II 95 .. . .. Rltflin D.-Nbb9E' ._. ._._.......__._.... ......_._.. .. .. 1431:05 _ .. ._ ._.. . ... MEETING RXFRNIE- . .. . ., 117096 MORGAN CRANE CO.. INC. $4,411.02 TRUCK PALATE 117,97 MOTION INDUSTRIES, INC. $433.17 MOTORS .. 1blallo - - MOYDIIUL'A) Illt:""- '.......__.._........ ........ ... . U66.N3 - .. .... ___.. ... .. RADIOS . �Q/1 I0699 MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICES 188.3R INSTRUMENT REPAIR IU7100 HULICK, INC. $954.93 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT �••� 1n 7 is-I w iluRAL'PLANt st RVltEsi IBC. 16.644.Sli VAccuN TRUCK SERVICE P� ID 7112 NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPLY ♦196.711 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES p 207103 HATIOYAL Tr CHNICAL INFORMATION 1509.00 DEPOSIT • IJ,I I i7104 City of NENIORT REACH' "" 15.44 WATER " 1 1071115 CITY OF NEVI'OPT PEACH 576.1.4 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 1•. 107111E CHARLES NICHOLS S29.54 MEETING EXPENSE L� Ir 7167 NO2ceL raxt6oLs. list AL MECHANICAL FARTS 107100 UNITED NOTTINGHAM S51.eP FREIGHT IE7109 O.-.S./SOLAG 01PIOSAL CO SBS.r10 TURN REMOVAL �•'� 1A711b OCCUPATIONAL VI 3ERVICt.t ;591.7T SAFETY CLASSES - i 107111 ON-LINE ELFCTPDNICS 1112.10 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES j W FU6U NN al"P - JI 1:1'1 60MMINR Cc1ITAL YPOCESSINE, DATE 5/li/a•. IAC.f 5 REPORT HUMUER Alt! b3 COUNTY SAI'ITFTION GISTRICTS OF ORANFI COUNTY Ul CIAINS PAID O6/2.3/1! POSTING DATE 05/23/9/ I - WARRANT NO. VENOOP AMOUNT PESCRIPTION rl 117112 PO!9'MT J. 007EN $262.2V MEETING EXPENSE I I, 197113 ORAYCE HEARING. RIC. 1399.7E _ _ MECHANICAL PARTS _ !+I IO111t ORANGE COISI CL[CTR 1C SUYPLT _ f395.55 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 167115 DRA NGE COUNTV FAR" RIIPPLT CO. S337.P5 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES II t116 ORANGE VALVE 1 FITTING CO. f2.9R2.17 PITTINGS I 1,17117 OSCAP FS LOCK L S1rC -- - - 314 !O KEYS ' I 107119 OXYRIN SERVICE 12.298.78 SPECIALTY CASES , 117119 ., ._ _.COUNTY Of ORANGE_ _ _ f3.JJ5.00 _ DATA PROCESSING SERVICES 01 SP7120 CSOOC SELF-FUNDED MEDICAL INS' t1V0.103.00 PREMIUM ADVANCE ^1 107121 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 16,166.14 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE '�• IOl1E2___ __ ROPE.PT L. CITRON _ $75.00__. „DEFERRED COMP- PICKLES .. i __�__ I'+ I071P3 - PACIFIC SEMEN MAINTENANCE CO. f5.269 36 SAFETY SUPPLIES 107121 FACIr IC SEMEN RAINIE NANCE CORD SB.861 l6 SEWER PIPES '> I _ 107125 FAR_UCST _ _ _ . i1329911 _.__ JANITORIALSUPPLIES .. _ .... 1! 1O71Y6 EECYC PLLL 7I ER �— $317 07 MEETING EXPENSE IC 7327 ROT PENDERSROFT $445.00 DEFERRED CORE DISTRIBUTION V'j-.1 1071'2R _ PHOTO 6 SOUND CO. _., _ .. f13161.10__ ____,___ OFFICE EQUI PMLNT .,II/3T •+ 101129 PIMA SR PIERCE fl63.00 SLUDGE EXPENSE 117131 PIMA SRO SVSiFN$. INC. $44.245.47 SLUDGE REMOVAL M 0.3-11MEN ; 17i131 _ _ _FISH YUH f197.17 REFUND USER PLL OVERPAYMENT P ADO 1071 PLAINS TR UUE PAR Yi .293.88 POLYMERS HARDWARE • 107133 FOLYFURE. INC.EN f30.203.R6 POLYMeRB M.O.1-10-90,0-9-89 . 167134 .... .. POWCP ELECTRO SUPPLY CQy^ ^� _ _._ $130.31 ELECTRIC,SUPPLIES, r107135 HAROLDTPRIMR P00IICEI$ 1799.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES IC7136 HOOFED PRIMROSE ICE f1N.30 ICE P^:r 107136 _. , . IROFCSSIONAL TREE ASSOCIATES $39.]R .TREE REMOVAL 1071]N •40i E5510 NAL TREE CARE f2.003.10 -- _ _�-- -- tIl¢8 REMOVAL �•:.-i 1-7139 THE PROJECTS SOLUTION CO. $4.399.30 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION H.0.8-10-88 In 107116 PAOCLIFFE CONSULTING GRP 1293.00 PUMP PARTS ja I07N1 R61MR6Y RI$IR3AL EO. - -- fl.dii.13 TRASH REMOVAL ti 107142 RCCYC. INC. 139.900.110 SLUDGE REMOVAL H.0.5-11-80 :•'C1 107113 M.A. REED ELECTRIC 1105.I5 ELECTRIC MOTOR � I� 107111 - if,if Pff-7. BECO - �- � - - - - - 1115.:IO - MEETING EXPENSE _ 147145 THE REGISTER f13R.55 NOTICES 6 ADS •? 1.7146 REMEDY TrpP _ f1.339.59 _ TEMPORARY SERVICES j 10714t 111E RE4URLIC SUPPLY CO. 16U2.71 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES p� 1.17148 RENES rNGINLLRIMG CO. f1.652.I9 MANHOLE COVERS J� 1CT119 NICHAPDS. WATSON A GERSHO_N 17.192.23 _ _ LEGAL SERVICES M.0.6-11-86 107150 LAURENCE R066 3325.51 MEETING EXPENSE IRTISI ROYCE IHSTRUIIr NT $1,131.23 INSTRUMENT PARTS 167152 PUTAN 0 TUCKER S29.336.29 LEGAL SERVICES - BEATRICE/HUNT 6 UNIVERSAL CIRCUITS r(( �{ IO7153 NYAN-NERCO 61R.196.13 CRATING p,l 137154 JOSCFII I. RYERSON R SON, INC. 14.17.11 PUMP PART ..I IMS5 S1tETT-FLEfN COMP. S132.R0 PARTS CLEANER '• 10115E SANIA ANA ELECTRIC MOIONS L416.91 ELECTRIC MOTOR .I 107157 SANTA Fr GAS co. 635.d1 FREIGHT L ]n FUND If ni jQ - JT nl$l WORKING CLI-I III FROCiSSING DATE S/11/9" FAGF 6 REPORT DUNHER AT4l CW COIIl11Y San,IT AI[on DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ' •' 1 CLAIMS PAID 3S/23/9) POSTING DATE D5/23/40 ! CF1 I -WARRANT ND. VENDOR AMOUNT PESC41^TION Irl p.l,. I07I SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT•L 212.455.52 OF MONITORING N.0.6-14-89 IP71" $I A. COSST DESIGNS f2.296.72 OFFICE FURNITURE 10716F• bEWEP'F.aUTP: CO. OF ARI'N I[d - "' "' t1.187.99 - -- -- - TOOLS - -': I. 107i61 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $616.81 SAFETY SUPPLIES IV7162 SHARED LOGIC* INC. $225 00 REGISTRATION 107165 - - - SHELL OIL to. - _ - _ - - - 145.0 - REFUND USSR PEE ow"AYMENT 13 u 107164 CONSTANTINE SIAC[LLO 115.391 '•0 DEFERRED COMP PAY-OFF e. 107165 SMITH-EMERY CO. 1/9690 0U SOIL TESTING M 0.6-Id-B9 ,- -'-""I07186 "'_ SOFT" VAREMDUSC " - "_-'-_- - - -- - - -378.34 "'-'_"" _ .-._-_ RUMPUTER SOFTWARE - - � 1A7167 SOIL AND TESTING ENGINEERS f246.B9 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-09 n :I- 19716R SOLAR TURUINES E7) INC. i9R.7B FREIGHT ._ 1C7169 -,SO. AIR GUM TV ` - - 13;066.55 APPLICATION PEPS fYl 147170 SOUTH COAST DODGE S127.CP TRUCK PARTS Z r•p Ir17172 SOU1 CALIF. EDI SON CO. 4289.4TB.41 POWER r;D' IdT 172' ... --" '-"SO: CALICACIi.'"E OISON' [D:' _.__..___ .. ._ _-.-..._. ..;Bs749.b1....--.-.__._."-._..-P6iGR FOLR RRLDCATIOE PI-J3 �..y 147173 SO. CAL. GAS CO. $6.192.05 NATURAL GAS 1117174 SO. CALIF. WATER CO. $90.63 WATER USEAGE 3 197375 _ _-- SoU1HCRN_COUNIICS_OWED. 17r365.24.__.__.... --_....OIRSEL FUEL. _ .. . . . .. -_.. �• 107176 SPARKLFTTS ORINMING WATER $1,546.67 DRINKING WATER :•4_ 107177 WESTALLOY INC. 42.2R5.1T WELDING SUPPLIES .-.W 101i 78 ._. . .._. _SPIRAL BINDING"CD:"-IND: _____ _.._-.i573:2�.----_.--OPPICE SUPPLIER.._ 107179 STAR TOOL S SUPPLY CO. f566.18 TOOLS 107280 STCNLIAG ART f41.59 - GRAPHIC SUPPLIES .-r147161 NIRC -STURT _--- - -- -"'""-""#354.iR '_'_'----- _"---MEETING EXPENSE -- 107182 SUMMIT STEEL $29134.93 STEEL •.r 101183 SUN-PELT LANDSCAPE S RAINY. 139847.00 CONTRACT CROUNDSKEEPING M.0.8-9-89 ... - 107194' - SUN tEECIRt[-tBRP_. . ..._..-.._..-...._- .__._. -" 239"P0 TRUCK PARTS ti 1071P5 SUNSET FORD f21 58 TRUCK PARTS <CO 1:7186 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL. INC. S8,271.66 TOOLS ;j pry 1371FT SURVEYORS-SERVICE CO: -_-_" 13;914.b7 "- RAPETT SUPPLIES I9TIR. TAYLON-JUNN SIR6.25 TRUCK PARTS G-1 14 TIH9 TF.P9AR COMPANY t1.S76.25 LAB SUPPLIES ,. N. _ 1.1719G TONNE AOVERIISFMS - -_-_- _ S9:573.13 "- -- - ASSESMENT USER FEE MAIL DOT FIST 2 - 1G7191 TRAVEL TRAVEL 12.274.30 TRAVEL SERVICES M.0.6-14-87 161152 TRUCK A AUTO SUPPLY. INC. _ 1543.65 TRUCK PARTS n IC7193 J.G. TUCRER S EON, IkC. 1538.35 BATTERIES - 1 I 307194 TWINING LADFIRATORIES OF $79133.25 SOIL TESTING M.O.6-14-89 11.7195 THE UNISOURCE CORP. fR.R99.56 _ PAPER ' 19719A UNTIED PARCEL SCRVICE '365.29 PARCEL SERVICES- - - -" 197197 NILLAP ELEVATOR COMPANY $326.15 SERVICE AGREEMENT _ I. I0119P YUP SCI ENIIFiC f29089.17 LAB SUPPLIES IP71P9 VALIN CORPORATION $553.97 REGULATOR PART 1072)0 VALLEY CITIES SUFFLY CO. 14.341.19 FITTINGS ' I17201 VARIAN INSTRUMFNI GFDUP 1693.25 LAB EQUIPMENT - �- 1P7202 VTKING INDUPTRIAL 3UPFLY 3730.56 SAFETY SUPPLIES - - - " L. I 72 C3 LARRV UAL KEN A59O CIATES. INC. 46.921.1. CONSULTING SERVICES - CLEAN WATER GRANTS 1 rsl 'UND NO ^1'^ JT UIST VONVINE CAI IT7L IIRCCLSSI14G n.IE 5117/^ IAGF 7 REPORT NUNRLP AF41 Ep C'WNTY SAIIITITION UISIRICIS OF ORANLE COUNTY I LLSINR W D +R/.^5/n4 POSIIUG DATE 15/2S/'l1 V �NANRANT NN. VC111.ON 14OUN1 DESCRIPTION 1077C. MARK U. NALILN fl^2.Of• MEETING EXPENSE 19721!5 _ NALTFRS NNOLFSALF ELECTRIC 5239.cf LLELTREC SUPPLIES 107266 _ CAPE UARRBJ' t CO, - fP.592.39 - INSURANCE CUING ADMINISTRATOR 117267 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL $56.75 PUBLICATION IP7238 GARY YFLLN4N 1342.P6 MEETING EXPENSE 167209 - 4NIAUOU CoRl'. REFUND USE PLL OVERPAYMENT I,�I IF721G NILLOAN ASSPCIATLS $391.61 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-29 197211 ROUPxE A 6DOD0 UFC 446.296.19 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.6-4-89 kEROk-COAFL - _. . _......_.._ .... _. _ _ - _ - '11/0.96 _ COPIER LEASES. .. . . .. ._ ... 107213 YELLOW SPRINGS INSTRUMENT CO. $134.43 LAB REPAIRS ;3. 147214 VICTOR ZORITNSx1 1600.27 MEETING EXPENSE m ha215 -RRifARGK LULLF. ____.__ _. _. _ -3236.FP _. ....- _ _. DEFRRaRD COMP HSTIB17IION _. ----------------- � y P5123794 t !URINARY ANDUNT ' ...01 OPER FUND .. ._._—__.... ___._ _ _..-_.___. . _ - 343.00' A 12 OPER FUND 13,993.15 {1 12 CAP FAC FUND 1.253 107 43 i-- 03 OPER FUND .. ._..___._ .__. ... .. _.__ . ._ .. -- 7571010._ 05 OPER FUND 5.058.09 05 OAP PAC FUND 55.338.6657 fi OPER FUND .... __ - - - ... __ —_.- .....- . . - RS].2 21L___._._ 07 DOES FUND 13.883.96 07 CAP PAC FUND - 368.705.47 1 Oil OPER FINITE _ - . . _.. 8,443.67 Ill CAP PAC .76 00 y 014 OPER FUND 3816__ _ . 014 OEPR FUND - - - 1,99292.9494 - .En 014 CAP PAC FUND 4.293.14 0566 OPER FUND . 4761 CAP RAC NDNO 1,174.50 69,4 07614 OVER FUND 210.78 JT OPER FUND I.014,210.78 , CORF - .. 2;496.520.54 _ ._.... _ _ _..._. .. ... SELF FUNDED RUBBERS COMP INSURANCE FUND 119,862.03 JT NURSING CAPITAL FUND 179,126.23 5,614,844.53 I June 1, 1990 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS MEMORANDUM of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA +ssaa ewe.WNUE TO: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager ueaa. xmmraw varMIMW , sxne.e+n n+a seas824on11 FM: Ted Hoffman, Purchasing Manager RE: Purchase of One (1) Inductively Coupled Plasma Emission Spectrometer, Specification No. E-190 Sealed bids were opened Tuesday, May 8, 1990 for the Purchase of One (1) Inductively Coupled Plasma Emission Spectrometer. Tabulation of bids is as follows: VENDOR BID ITEM LEEMAN LABS, INC. LECO CORP. A. Inductively Coupled Plasma $136,675.00 $137, 000. 00 Emission Spectrometer with an Ultrasonic Nebulizer. B. Inductively Coupled Plasma 121,675.00 122, 000.00 Emission Spectrometer without an Ultrasonic Nebulizer. An alternate bid was requested to exclude the Ultrasonic Nebulizer. Due to the equipment budget dollar amount, and the fact this accessory item will not be needed in the near future, the alternate bid is recommended for purchase. Leeman Labs, Inc. , the apparent low bidder failed to meet the required specifications on one item. Specifications required a solid-state radio frequency generator. Their unit bid includes a power tube type. It is recommended the bid and alternate bid from Leeman Labs, Inc. , be rejected for not meeting specifications. It is further recommended that the award be made to Leco Corporation, lowest bidder in compliance with all specifications, for the proposed amount of $122,000.00 plus sales tax for bid B. Sufficient funds are available from the capital equipment budget for this purchase. Ted Hoffman Purchasing Man er We hereby concur with the foregoing recommendation: �..►� G y G. treed, Charles Jacks' D recto of Finance Laboratory Manager "C" AGENDA ITEM N9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS °C , COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 FIT AVENUE FOMMLIN VALLEY, CAL4'ORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Seventeen (171 CONTRACTOR. J. R. Roberts Cgrnnratian DATE June 13. 1990 JOB: Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (DedgsL) $ 21,626.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as oaq)ensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - FIRE ALARM SYSTEM ADDITION The Contractor was directed to furnish and install a new fire alarm system to serve the Administration Building. The fire alarm system was required by the City of Fountain Valley Fire Department and was not included in the contract. The work consisted of installing a fire alarm control panel in the New South Wing Utility Room No. 130 and a remote annunciator in the Plant 1 Control Center, installing 3/4-inch conduit from the utility room to Telephone Room No. 153 in the existing Administration Building, installing a 3/4-inch conduit and wires from the fire alarm control panel to the fire sprinkler pipe flaw and temper switches located at the southwest corner of the New South Wing, furnishing and pulling a new No. 9 conductor cable from the utility room to the Control Center and wiring the above equipment. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCR 44, 44A and 44B) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 10,841.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - REHEAT COIL FOR CONFERENCE ROOM A The Contractor was directed to add a reheat coil to the HVAC variable air velocity unit serving Roam No. 110 (Conference Room A) in the New South Wing. No provision was made in the contract drawings or specifications to provide heat to this room, which always remained cold in winter. A hot water coil, three-way valve and associated piping was added and connected to the existing hot water system pining in the ceding of the New South Wing. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 77) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,904.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "U-1" AGENDA ITEM #90) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELSSS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIT r MA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Seventeen (17) COTIPRACPDR: J. R. Roberts Corooiation DATE June 13, 1990 JOB:—Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4 Item 3 - ABATING AND VENTILATING COMPEWSOR R1=ATION The Contractor was directed to relocate the heating and ventilating system air compressor and air dryer out of the existing Administrat:Lo, Building Elevator Fgai wmt Room No. 134 to the outer foyer. This item of work was required by the State of California Division. of Industrial Safety Elevator Section. The work consisted of ra,,7nug and rein-tarring the air compressor, air dryer, electrical disconnect box and associated wiring. This item of work ors acomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 40A) . _ ADDED COST THIS CHANGE CHEM ITEM: $ 3,439.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 - MISCELIANEOUS ELECTRICAL CHANGES - NEW SOUTH WING The Contractor was directed to perform additional electrical changes in various rooms of the Now South Wing and the Chiller Hui 1di The items are as follows: provide power to an additional irrigation control unit on the east side of the Chiller Building; wire power boasters for electric latches on Doors 20 and 25 in the lobby of the New South Wing; add light fixtures in Room Nos. 116, 120 and 208. These items of cork were accarpli.shed by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCC) 52) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORCER ITEM: $ 2,442.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ONW ITE24: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 21,626.00 TOM TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be perfonaed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any revisions to the Contract Time made by this and any previously issued Charge `..� Orders. It is therefore uutnally agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential coats or expenses have been or will be incurred by the Contractor. "D-2" AGENDA ITEM p9(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-2" + r COUNTY SANIMTION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNMIR VALLEY, CUZEURSSA 92798 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Seventeen (17) CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE June 13, 1990 JOB: ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION, JOB NO. J-7-4 SUMMARY OF CONTRACT Tim Original. Contract Date July 11, 1988 Original Contract Time 602 Calendar Days Original Caupletion Date March 4, 1990 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Tice Extension 89 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 691 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date June 1, 1990 Time Subject to I gaidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 3,549,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 462,578.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct.) $ 21,626.00 Amended Contract Price $ 4,033,204.00 Bawd Authorization Date: June 13, 1990 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDED BY: ) Construction Manager Date J. R. RCBERT5 CORPORATION BY: BY - r �., �%t/- 9, �J Oontxactor Date Director of Engineering Date "D-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-3" COUNTY SAMATIM DISIRICIS OF CRANE CODNPY Page 1 of 4 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 E[T•TS AVENUE FaNTAIN VALLEY, CAInTRUA 92708 CHAIXE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A C. O. NO. One (1) CONPRAMM: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE June 13, 1990 JOB: CENnM IABORATORY. JOB NO. J-17 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (DaducL) $ 22,378.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 BOII,DING PAD FIIIPER FABRIC The Contractor was directed to furnish and install filter fabric over the bottom area of the structure foundation overexcavatian for stabilization of existing soils. This was necessary in order to begin engineered backfill and auction required by the contract specifications. Upon ccupletion of the required overexcavaticn, the Districts' soils consultant farad the wasting soils to be too unstable to obtain the required aopaction without some prior stabilization. Installation of filter fabric was the method determined to be most economical. Filter fabric was not shorn on the contract plans or included in the contract specifications. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO $1) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER Tffid: $ 20,832.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 7 Calendar Days Item 2 HARDWARE ADDITICNLS AND DE=CNS The Contractor was directed to modify the hardware schedule shown in the contract specifications. This resulted in an addition of hardware sets for Doors 59, 63, 86 and 91 and a magnetic contact for Door 40. The above items were riot included in the hardware schedule. Ttelve specified door drop latches were found to be unnecessary and were deleted. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: RFI Nos. 3 and 4) ADDED COST THIS CEA4M ORDER ITEM: $ 587.00 TIME EME NSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "E-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "E 1^ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF CHANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 4 _.. P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 W-1 AVENUE FOUR PAIN VALLEY, CALIECHNIA 92708 �✓ CHANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A C. O. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE June 13, 1990 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 Item 3 RESTAOOK PIPE nmmaaTAL CHANGE The Contractor was directed to change the contract-specified extra heavy cast iron pipe for the restroan drains and vents, to service weight cast iron. This change was made due to the unavailability of extra heavy cast iron plumbing pipe and fittings necessary to complete the project as shown on the contract drawings. This item of work was accwnplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #2) . DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (1,155.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 CHANGES TO ELEVATOR FINISH The Contractor was directed to change the finishes on the elevator cab doors and hoistway entrances fran baked enamel to brushed stainless steel. The project architect requested the change as stainless steel is a :rare durable finish and will age better over the life of the project. No finishes were specified for the elevator in the contract specifications. This item of work was accarplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: HE No. 28) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,114.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 5 DELETION OF 120-DAY LIQUIDATED D MGES CLAUSE The contract required the Contractor to cafplete installation of the roadwork and underground utilities in a time period of 120 days from the date of issuance of the Notice to Proceed. Southern California Edison's service rez++rements for the facility have not been finalized which may affect installation of underground utilities and site work as shown on the contract drawings. It was detenn ned that it would be mtually advantageous to J.R. Roberts and the Districts to delete this contract requirement. This item of work was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the G�meral Provisions. (Reference: OCSD letter 3/14/90) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 0.00 �../ TINE EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER TM: 0 Calendar Days "E 2 " AGENDA ITEM #9(C) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-2 " COUNTY SANPl'AITCN DISTMI5 OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 108" WELTS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, allaFDRNIA 92708 CHANGEOR�R GRANT NO. N/A C. O. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation MSE June 13. 1990 JCB• CENIRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 TOTAL ADIXD COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 22,378.00 TOTAL TINE EIM SION THIS CHANCE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work stained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prise work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Tine made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 7 days' extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Osier, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SO OPM OF CO1NTRACT TINE Original Contract Date Nazch 1, 1990 Original Contract Tice 420 Calendar Days Original Completion Date April 24, 1991 Time Extension this C.O. 7 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 7 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 427 Calendar Days Revises Final Completion Due Date May 1, 1990 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 7,090,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 22,378.00 Amended Contract Price $ 7,112,378.00 "E-3" AGENDA ITEM N9(C) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-3" =MTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF CRAMS COMM Page 4 of 4 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 1311TC AVENGE FOMMUN VALLEY, OUJF RUA 92708 CBANGE ORDER GRANT NO. N/A C. 0.. NO. One (11 CONIRACIOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE June 13, 1990 JOB:-CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 Board Authorization Date: June 13, 1990 COMITY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA REC2092 ED BY: natnwtion mma��o Data J. R. ROBERTS CORPO2ATICH ACCCEEPTEE�D.BY: / ,� VBY: cmdmacter Data Di ra,-r..' of EngUmering Date "E-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(c ) ALL DISTRICTS "E-4" COUNTY SANP1'MON DISTRICTS OF CHANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 2 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 PfT.TC AVENUE FT NBUN VALLEY, CALIFCMTIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: Cooper Industries DATE June 13. 1990 Energy Services GrOUD JOB: Purchase of Spark-Ignited Engines for Use in Central Pmer veneration Systems, Job No. J-19A Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Dech:ck) $ 10,000.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes 3n the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as coupensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 ADD PIITOR CCNIROL STATION The supplier is directed to add a new control to the computer control system furnished under the basic purchase contract agree ent for each of the eight engines in accordance with the proposal dated April 11, 1990, increasing the total authorized amount from $20,658,245.00 to $20,668,245.00. The increase was negotiated with the supplier in accordance with Section 10-6(B) (2) (a) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE OREM ITEM: $ 10,000.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 CHANGES IN DF.r.I= SCHEDULES The original supply agr t contains numerous delivery dates. This item changes dates for selected equipment based on mutual need. The changes are as follows: Original Revised Delivery Item Delivery Date Extension Date Heat Recovery 6/30/90 63 Days 9/1/90* Equipment and Controls (2-4[1]) Spare Parts (2-4[L]) 6/3/90 58 Days 8/l/90 *Original coupletion date for receipt of heat recovery equipment (480 days) was previously extended, based on date of Notice to Proceed. "F-I" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "F 1" Comm SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 2 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 RE-1 AVENDE FODNTATN VALLEY, CALIECRNIA 92708 CBANGE ORDER C. O. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: Coffer Tndug;triw DATE June 33, 1990 Enemy Services Group JOB: Purchase of Spark-Ignited Engines for use in Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19A The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mxtually agreed that no time is required for this Change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly gated and approved by this Change order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TINB Original Contract Date February 9, 1989 original Contract Time 480 Calendar Days Original Ccffpletim Date June 3, 1990 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 89 Calendar Days Revised Contract Tim_ No Change Revised Final Completion Due Date September 1, 1990 Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Tine Subject to I&pidated Damages Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 18,968,113.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 1,690,132.00 (Amendments 1, 2 and 3) This Change (Add) (Dada=) $ 10,000.00 Amended Contract Prise $ 20,668,245.00 Board Authorization Date: June 13, 1990 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA REC=17mp BY: Construction Manager Date COOPER INDUSTRIES ENERGY SERVICES GROUP ACCEPTED BY: APPROVED BY: Date Director of Engineering Date "F-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-2" COUNTY SANiTA'ITON DISTRICTS OF CHANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 4 `.►' P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 EISSS AVENUE FaDWLIN VALLEY, CALITURNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Five (5) CONTRP.CIOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE June 13, 1990 JOB: WAREHOUSE AND MINTENANCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING II4TOVEMENTS, JOB NO. J-20 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Doduct.) $ 16,526.34 In accordance with contract provi.ei.ons, the following changes do the Contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as caq nsaticn therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - BUILDING INSULMON DWERIAL CHANGE _. The Contractor was directed to change the type of building insulation to be installed in the open ceiling area of Buildings 4, 5 and 6. The type of insulation was changed f3= unfaced batts to foil-faced fire rated type. Installation of open faced batts per the contract specifications would have resulted in fiberglass dust constantly falling of Districts' personnel working below the unfinished ceilings. The open faced insulation will also become a nui.sance dust collector in the the future, creating an unhealthy working envirconent. This item of work was acco(plshed by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: POO 18) ADDID COST THIS CHANGE ORDER T1'EM: $ 9,852.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - FENCING AND GATES FOR BUILDING 8 The Contractor was directed to furnish and install new fencing and gates to enclose the auto shop coupound. A new double 10-foot wide gate was installed on the north side of the auto shop coupound at the request of Districts' maintenance staff to provide service access to the area between the auto coupound chain-Link fence and the existing brick wall co the south side of El J Avenue. A new 27-foot wide gate was fabricated and installed between Building 8 and the existing Auto Shop to secure the southwest entrance to the auto shop coupound. These gates were not shown on the contract drawings and were not included do the contract specifications. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 19) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,459.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "G-1"" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "G 1" CD[II7iY SADII=CN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 4 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE - FOU nUN VALLEY, (71LU-CRUTA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Five (5) CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE June 13. 1990 JOB: WAREHOUSE AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING IMPROVEI,=, JOB NO. J-20 Item 3 - BUILDING 6 DISHWASHER ADDITION The Contractor was directed to furnish and install a dishwasher in the new kitchen in Building 6. The contract drawings and speafficatims dirt not include a dishwasher for the kitchen. This item of cork was acccaplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: JRR quote 3/14/90) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,247.00 TINE EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER I+IEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 - EXISTING ELECTRIC PANEL BUS BAR ADDITION The Contractor was directed to add a new bus bar to exazt g electrical panel "D" inside the existing electrical/instrument shop "A." The bus bar was added in order to provide space to connect new electrical power feeder cables serving Buildings 5 and 6 as the existing bus bar was found to have inadequate space to make the new connections. The new bus bar was not shown on the contract drawings nor included in the contract specifications. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: RFI No. 65) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER TI M: $ 1,809.00 TIME EXTENSICN THIS CHANGE ORDER TIM: 0 Calendar Days Item 5 - CONCRETE SEALER MATERIAL CHANGE The Contractor was directed to change the contract-specified floor sealer to a combination floor hardener penetrating sealer. The sealer spacified was an acrylic surface sealer used for low traffic areas and was a non-penetrating type, subject to peeling from sustained use. The penetrating type sealer will not be subject to wear. This item of work was accarplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: JRR quote 4/17/90) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,888.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER TI M: 0 Calendar Days "G-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "G 2" COUNTY SAnTrrnmrCN DZS1'RICTS CF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 4 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELT.TC AVENUE FOUNIAAIN VALLEY, all EMUMA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Five (5) CONTRACTOR: J. R. Roberts Corporation DATE June 13. 1990 JOB: WAREHOUSE AND M lbTM ANCE BUILDING AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING IMPROVEMENTS, JOB NO. J-20 Item 6 - ABADIDON[+ U OF 6-1NCB WATER LINE The Contractor was directed to delete the abandonment of an existing 6-inch city water line crossing the North Road in two locations south of the Administration Building New South Wing as shown on Contract Drawing G8. The work was required by the City of Fountain Valley but was performed by another contractor enployed by the Districts. This item was aco mplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (2,726.66) T114E EXTENSICN THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 16,528.34 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be perfoared incidental to the prise work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and airy extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore nutually agreed that no time is required for this Change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date February 27, 1989 Original Contract Time 240 Calendar Days Original Ccapletial Date October 25, 1989 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 43 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 283 Calendar Days Revised Final Coirpleti.on Due Date December 7, 1989 Actual Final CaVl.etion Date Not Applicable `J Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable "G-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-3" CC= SANr CN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COMM Page 4 of 4 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 EfT.TS AVENM FO[IIdl' M VALLEY, CALIk1 OZM 92708 CHANCE ORDER C. O. W. Five (51 CONIRACTOR: J.R. Roberts DATE June 13, 1990 JOB: WaMOTISE AND MAINIENANCE 13=11G AND OIL STORAGE AND DISPENSING IMPROVEMENTS, JOB NO. J-20 Original Contract Price $ 3,266,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 220 456.00 This Change (Add) (Dom ) $ 16,528.34 Mended Contract Price $ 3,502,984.34 Board Authorization Date: June 13, 1990 COONPY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORATXE COUNTY, CAi.IEORNIA RECOfII✓MWED BY: Construction ManagerDate J. R. ROOMM COEMP. CK Y: APFe= BY: Coutractoa• Date Director of Engineering Date "G-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNPY Page 1 0£ 7 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE EOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORIM 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Twenty-Nine (29) CONPRP.CIC7R: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE June 13, 1990 JOB: HBAIIeAmRS NO. 2 AT PI,ANr NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-20: AND DEanr.rrrON OF DIGESTERS NOS. 1, 2 AND 4: REPLACEMBNr OF BOIIER: PIPING CLEANOVPS: AND GRADING AND PAVING AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-31 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 130,821.95 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorizer) and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Job No. P1-31 Item 1 - NEW BOII.ER MODIETCATIONS The Contractor was directed to make modifications and additions to the hot water circulation system at the new, boiler. Alan included in this item is the relocation of a light pole for better distribution of light at the boiler control panel at night. The significant parts of this item include furnishing and installing of a hot water control valve and a pneumatic indicating valve. These parts were not shown on the contract drawings and were necessary for proper boiler operation. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCO Nos. 168 and 129 and PCB No. 86) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 9,138.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER TPEM: 0 Calendar Days Job No. P1-20 Item 2 - INFI )ENT PUMP AND SCRDBHER CONTIM MODIFICATION The Contractor was directed to furnish and install additional pressure switches on the influent pump seal water system and to the scrubber recirculation pumps. Also included in this item is a modification to the scrubber differential pressure transm tters and the pressure-to-current transducers at each of the four scrubbers. In regard to the added pressure switches, the seal water system on the influent pumps required sensing elements to identify a seal water failure. The scrubber recirculation pumps discharge piling required sensing elements to verify flows within the scrubbers. These required pressure switches were not shown on the contract drawings. The scrubber differential pressure transmitter and pressure-to-current transducer were furnished and installed per the contract. The original contract docmients did not include provisions to transmit a signal from the transmitter or the transducer to any type of recording or indicating device. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: ECO Nos. 172, 201 and 203, PCH Nos. 104, 118 and 120) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 13,141.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "H-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-1" CO[ M SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 7 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE EODNPAIN VALLEY, CHIN A 92708 CHANGE ORDEE C. 0. NO. Twenty-Nine (29) CONUMCTC7R: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE June 13, 1990 JOB: NH'^Adr-- NO. 2 AT PLANE NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-20: AND DEMOUTION OF DIGBSTEOS IRIS. 1, 2 AND 4: REPIMTMENT OF BOILER: PIPING CLEAN)UTS: AND GOADING AMID PAVING AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-31 Item 3 - IEM INDICATOR ADDITIONS The Contractor was directed to furnish and install two digital electronic wet well level indicators at the VFD roan in Power Building 3A. These additions were requested by the Districts' Operations staff. In the event the automatic control system for the influent pumps failed, the Districts' staff would have to operate the pimps manually at the VFD's. The contract dial not include level indicators in the VFD room. Without level indicators in the VFD room it would be difficult adjusting punp speeds to match N+canNng flows. This item was negotiated with the Contractor ro„e.a„t to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: E00 No. 221, PCH No. 122) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 7,593.00 TDO EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 - MIAOT PUMP SYSTEM COA'ROI. I=C MODIFICATION The Contractor was directed to modify the influent pump system control logic. The nrdifications included two additional digital indicators on the Headworks control panel, an additional two-position selector switch and control logic program revisions. These modifications were requested by the Districts' Operations staff to be able to monitor each of the levels in the two ptmp wet wells and to eliminate a potential problem of locking out the lag influent pop during a lead punp failure. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(h) (2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER P..l'EMM: $ 6,251.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "H-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-2" ' COUNTY SANrBMCN DISIRICIS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 7 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENGE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Twenty-Nine (291 CONPRPLTM: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE June 13, 1990 JOB: HFADKORXS NO. 2 AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-20; AND nFmrm.rrrON OF DIGESTERS NOS. 1, 2 AND 4; RagACEMENT OF BOII,ER: PIPING CLEANOUi5: AND GRADING AND PAVING AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-31 Item 5 - GROW WIRE ADDITION AT UELUENT PUMPS The Contractor was directed to add additional ground wire between the four influent pump motors and their associated pummp bases. The additional ground wire was required to prevent pump hearing damage from stray ground wire currents flowing between the influent pump and its motor. The additional ground wire was not shown on the contract drawings. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: FM #223 and PCH #128) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,985.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER r M: 0 Calendar Days Item 6 - PLANT VMTER PIPING MODIFICATIONS The plant water piping system at the wo sting grit chambers required modification to accommodate the installation of the contract-specified stainless steel covers. The plant water piping was not shown on the contract drawings and conflicted with grit chamber cover installation. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #220) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER r1EM: $ 398.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 7 - CHLORINE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS The Contractor was directed to furnish and install four 120-volt receptacles and all associated conduit, wiring, electrical braces and terminations in the Chlorine Building. These additional receptacles were required to supply a power source to the contract-specified vacuum regulators on the chlorine system. Also included in this item is the addition of relays in the chlorine control panel to modify the circuitry of the motorized louvers and high pressure shutoff valves in the Chlorine Building. These modifications were required to facilitate the proper operation of the Chlorine Building's safety system in the event of a chlorine leak. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 198 and 216, PCR 107) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE CRDER ITEM: $ 5,112.00 TIME EXTENLSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "H-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-3" CCIMTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 7 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 Ei.r.rc AVENUE FOUNTAIN VAUZY, CALIFC1W1A 92708 C8» ORDER C. O. NO. Twenty-Nine (291 CONMRACTOR: Riewit Pacific Co. DATE June 13, 1990 JOB: HEAUKICRKS NO. 2 AT PLANT M. 1, JOB NO. P1-20; AND DEMLII,ITICN OF DIGESTERS NCB. 1, 2 AND 4; REPLACEMIENT OF BOILER; PIPING CLFANOUTS; AND GRADING AND PAVING AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-31 Item 8 - MODIFICATIONS TO STR[LMMAL TIE-IN AT THE NEW INLET CHANNEL The Contractor was directed to revise the location and method for the tie-in of the new inlet channel to the existing Metering and Diversion (M 6 D) Building. The revision on included the construction of a concrete wall section after the separation and disposal of the contract-specified removable wall panel on the existing M 6 D Wilding. The construction of this relocated wall involved a considerable amount of extra time and costs associated with work in a confined space which would not have been experienced if the wall had been constructed in the location shown on the contract plans. The wall relocation was required to avoid conflict with the Ellis Avenue trunk line which was relocated at the beginning of the project due to its conflict with the Sunflower Pump Station. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 92, PCS 60) ADDED COST THLH CHARM ORDER ITEM: $ 13,384.00 TIME 1DCMNSICN THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days It® 9 - ADDED WORX AT THE EXISTING BEADhUHI6 The Contractor was directed to remove two existing aluminum slide gates and one existing wooden stop log gate at the existing Headworks forebay and wet well area. After the removal of the contract-specified bar screens, the referenced gates served no function and could be a potential problem in the future if they failed. The Districts, Mechanical Maintenance Department requested the gate to be removed. The gates were not shown on the contract drawings to be remind. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: ECO 225) ADDED COST THIS Cmum ORDER ITEM: $ 3,054.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 10 - EXIST= HEADWORKS COVER PLATE REVISIONS The Contractor was directed to make revisions to the cover plate support beams at the existing Headworks. The support beam connections to other beams and to ca_rete surfaces were required to be modified for completion of the work. As shown on the contract drawings, a conflict existed between the -. of the beams and the connection bolts. This item of work was negotiated with ae Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the.General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 212) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,571.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "H-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-4" COUNTY GanirrnmrON DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 7 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELL IS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CAUTORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Twenty-Nine (291 CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE June 13, 1990 JOB: BEADWOM NO. 2 AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-20; AND DEMJLITICN OF DIGESTERS NOS. 1, 2 AND 4; REPLACEMENT OF BOILER; PIPING CLEANOUTS; AND GRADING AND PAVING AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-31 Item 11 - EXTRA FORK AT THE NEW INLET CHANNEL TIE-IN The Contractor was required to evacuate the new inlet channel area during an emergency flooding of the work area caused by the Districts' January 17, 1990 Metering and Diversion Structure gate failure. The extra costs involved with this item included the removal of all work forces and equipment and added work to rove debris and re-prepare areas for polyurethane coating and T-lock lining repairs. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: ECO 214) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,221.95 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE CRDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 12 - SLWUX ER PUMP STATION COVER REVISIONS The Contractor was directed to furnish and install hold dawn anchors on the lower' inclined Sunflower Pump Station covers and add additional flanges to the foul air piping. The installation as shown on the contract drawings required all covers to be roved to access the lower horizontal section of the Sunflower screw puap. The installation of hold down anchors on the lower inclined covers allowed for individual cover removal and greatly reduced the time and effort involved with maintenance on the lower portion of the screw pump. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference: ECO 218 and 232, PCe 123) ADDED CAST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITE14: $ 3,389.00 TIME EXTENSION IBIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "H-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-5" COMM SANITATION DISTRICTS OF CHANGE COUNTY Page 6 of 7 , P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 Fr-T c AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Twenty-Nine (291 CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE June 13, 1990 JOB: BEADWORRS NO. 2 AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-20; AND DEMOLITION OF DIGESTERS WFS. 1, 2 AND 4; FmAaEMENT OF BOILER; PIPING CIEAFAHTTS; AND GFADimG AND PAVING AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-31 Item 13 - EIBC :+TCAL NODIFICATION AT PMER BUILDING 3A The Contractor was directed to modify the electrical bus duct a: the standby energency generators at Power Building 3A. As shown on the contract drawings, a new tie bus was required to be incorporated in the existing electrical system in Power wlildi 3A. The contract drawings also required the installation of new 2000-amp bus duct. The addition of the new tie bus resulted in a possibility of experiencing 3000 amps of service at one time. This required the tie bus and other contract-specified bus duct to be increased to a capacity of 3000 amp. The majority of the changes involved with this item are associated with the difference in costs of materials between 2000 and 3000 amp rapacity. The remaining portion is associated with modifications to the existing system and adjustments to the existing standby generator panel to accept the new larger 3000-anp bus. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 54,584.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $130,821.95 TOTAL TDO EXTENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be perforaad incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extension to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, imidertel or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor. "H-6" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-6" COUNTY SANI=CN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 7 of 7 �i P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 TITT S AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CAL'4URNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Twenty-Nine (29) CONTRACTOR: Kiewit Pacific Co. DATE June 13, 1990 JOB: HEA1T,i0RKS NO. 2 AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-20: AND DEY1O TTDN OF DIGESTERS NOS. 1, 2 AND 4; REPIACE OU OF BOILER; PIPING CLEANOUTS; AND GRADING AND PAVING AT PIANP NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-31 SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date October 21, 1987 Original Contract Time 920 Calendar Days Original Ccupletion Date April 27, 1990 Tice Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 63 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 983 Calendar Days Revised Ccupletion Date June 29, 1990 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Ccupletion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 31,458,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 2,336,682.66 This Change (Add) (fit) $ 130,821.95 Amended Contract Price $ 33,925,504.61 Board Authorization Date; June 13, 1990 COUNTY SANIT!ATICN DISTRICTS OF OFP. M COMM, CAISFORNIA C Co6etruction Manager Date KID= PACIFIC CO. ACCEPTED BY: , APPIa�A'N BY: Can-tx� Date Director of Engineering Date "H-7" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-7" COONN QTTTT MCN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 2 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 FELTS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFTXAIIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors. Division of DATE June 13, 1990 Zurn Constructors, Inc. JOB: SLUDGE HANDLING FACILITIES AT ROCIA MON PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-2. Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 104,883.45 in accordance with contract provisions, the fol-laAng changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authnr;>ad and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 CONSTRUCTICN OF UNDERG17LU D 12KV SERVICE FOR NEW SERVICE CENTER This change order item provides for the construction of an underground 12KV service in lieu of the partially overhead system originally specified to provide electrical power to the new 12KV service center. The original plan calls for the new service to be Connected to a utility pole on Garfield Avenue and carried overhead to a new utility pole at the east side of the new 12KV service center. The service would have then gone underground and entered the Past side of the new facility. This plan was in conflict with the future plans of Southern California Edison and the cities of Huntington. Beach and Fountain Valley for the improvements along r afield Avenue. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 104,883.45 ME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER IIEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 104,883.45 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that n0 time is required for this Change order, and no d z a:t or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and armroved by this Change Order. "I-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(h)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "I 1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S OF CRALRE COUNFY Page 2 of 2 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 R1.1 S AVENUE FOU1n%IN VATSd;Y, CAL IMINIA 92708 CBANSE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE June 13, 1990 Zurn Constructors, Inc. JOB: SLUDGE HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECCAtMTiON PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-2. SUMhIIiRY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date August 1, 1989 Original Contract Time 600 Calendar Days Original Coupletion Date March 23, 1991 Time Extension This C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 600 Calendar Days Revised Coupletion Date March 23, 1991 Actual Final Coupletion Date Not Applicable Tice Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 19,085,600.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct-) $ 104,883.45 Amended Contract.Price $ 19,190,483.45 Board Authorization Date: June 13, 1990 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECCH E= BY: Construction lenager Data ADVANC) CONSTRUCTORS, DIVISION OF ZURN CARS, INC. AOCEPM) BY: APPROM BY: CoNUU. Date Wmect„r of Engineering Date "I-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(h)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-2" OOUN Y SANI a ICN DISMICTS OF CRANGE COMM Page 1 of 2 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 EGLJH AVENGE FaMMIN VALLEY, CAISEORuM 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Two (2) CONTRAL.'ICR: Advanco Constructors. Division of DATE June 13, 1990 Zurn Constructors, Inc. JOB: SLUDGE HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECIANATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-2. Amount of this Change Order (Add) (£edac.L) $ 132,628.20 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract cork are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 MODIFICATIONS TO NOW 12KV SERVICE CENM SWITCHGEAR The 12XV service center odtchgear (approved by the Districts on March 6, 1990 and released for manufacture by the Contractor soon after) was stopped in manufacture. The Contractor is directed to modify the switchgear, allowing for future cogeneration facility and interconnection and coordination with Southern California Edison's protective system. This change order provides for complete differential bus protection for both service center s tchgear lineups, installation of potential transformers for future cogeneration facility synchmnizinx circuit, installatim of current transformers for future differential bus protection system and installation of current transformers to operate future ovP.mnaent relays. This work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHALICE ORDER MEM: $ 132,628.20 TINL EXIE SION THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 132,628.20 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and arty extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously ,md Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required fo: this Change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses an damages have been will be incurred by Contractor, except expressly granted and approved by "J-1" this Change Order- AGENDA ITEM #9(h)(2) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OFMGE COUNTY Page 2 of 2 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 EIT.TC AVENUE FODNTAIN VALLEY, allaEMUM 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Two (2) CONTRA=: Advanoo Constructors, Division of DATE June 13, 1990 Zurn Constructors, Inc. JOB: SLUDGE HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PIANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-2. SWUff OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date August 1, 1989 Original Contract Time 600 Calendar Hays Original Completion Date March 23, 1991 Time Extension This C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Tine 600 Calendar Days Revised Completion Date March 23, 1991 Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Time subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 19,085,600.00 Prey. Anth. Changes $ 104,883.45 This Change (Add) (Aadvc4:) $ 132,628.20 Amended Contract Price $ 19.323,111.65 Board Authorization Date: June 13, 1990 COMM SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CUIFOUIIA RECOMMENDED BY: Constriction Manager Date ADVANCO CONSTRU TORS, DIVISION OF ZURN CONSTRUCTORS, INC. ACCEPTED BY: APPROVED BY: .. Contractc Date Director of Engineering Date "J-2" AGENDA ITEM M9(h) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 6 _ P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 IKET S AVENUE MUN AIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 92708 �.✓ CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Eight (8) CONTRACTOR: 21ESARIH & ALPER DATE June 13, 1990 JOB: M SCEIIAMM WDIFiCATSONS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT TREA'IDM PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-37 Ai t of this Change Order (Add) (Dedurk) $ 29,190.00 in accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - SUPPORTS FOR NEW SLUICE GATES AT PFTANZ BEADMIU(S The contract do=nents called for the reuse of the existing sluice gate operator supports when installing the new sluice gates at Pflanz Headxnrks. When details of the new, gates and operators were developed by the manufacturer based on Districts' criteria, the existing operator supports were found to be inadequate in size and too deteriorated for reuse. This change order item provides for the replacement of the existing supports with new units that were engineered to match the size of the new gate operator and the lifting requirements of the new sluice gates. Cost of the new supports was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(A) of the General Provision. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,430.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - ADDITIONAL PIPING FOR knURE "A" AND "B" DIGP.S"1'ER GAS COMPRESSORS It is the Districts' intent under a future construction contract to install a gas carpressor or gas ccapressors on the roof of "A" and "B" digester pmlp roan for use in association with the new cogeneration facilities at Plant No. 2. This change order item provides for the installation of additional pipe, fittings and valves in the existing digester gas piping system at the roof of "A" and "B" digester pLurp roan to accmmcdate the installation of future gas cagpressors. Work was perfumed on a cost plus percentage basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 9,629.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "K-1" AGENDA ITEM #90 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-1" COUNTY SANr=CN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE CO= Page 2 of 6 �../ P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 RrT•TR AVENUE ELHIITPAIId VALLEY, CALUIORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Eight (8) CONl'RACiC7R: 2IEBARTH S ALERR DATE June 13, 1990 JOB: ryDerELranmfM NDDIFICATIONTS AND IIIPADVEMENIS TO FACR rrrES AT TREATMENT PIANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-37 Item 3 - VENTING OF CHLOR-ALERT ALARM PANEL ENCLOSURES The seven chlor-alert alarm panels were installed in gas-tight fiberglass enclosures to protect the units from the corrosive Plant No. 2 atmosphere. The operation of the chlor-alert device is to sample air from a defined area and purge the sample back into the space adjacent to the chlor-alert device. As the protective fiberglass enclosure was gas-tight the sampling mechanism in the chlor-alert pressurized the enclosure and the sampling mechanism malfunctioned. This change order item provides for the installation of vents in the protective fiberglass enclosures to allow the chlor-alert sampling device to operate as designed. Work was performed on a lump sum basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(A) of the General Provisions. ADDED C0Rr TffiS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 775.00 TIME EXE&SION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 - WALKWAY CBMIGES AT NEW RAW SEWAGE POWER BUILDING The nest side of the new Raw Sewage Power Building was detailed to be built with a set back of 4'-0" from the inside curb of the adjacent roadway. An existing high voltage durtbank interfered with the construction of footings for the west wall at the specified location. The building was set back 10'-0" from the roadway to clear the existing ducthank and the walkway widened to correspond with the new set hack. In addition to the added width of the walkway, existing irrigation piping and controls had to be moved to eliminate interferences at new building entrances. Work was performed on a Force Account Pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ZTEM: $ 4,194.00 TIME EMENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "K-2" AGENDA ITEM #9( 1 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-2" COZNTY SAWBUTON DISTRICTS OF ORANGE CCCWX C Page 3 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 WEI AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Eight (8) CONnQDT01t: ZIEBAETH & ALPER DATE June 13, 1990 JOB: MISCELLANEOUS MODIFICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILI7gB AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-37 Item 5 - MODIFICATIONS TO TRIAL POLYMER STORAGE TANS AMID DELETION OF BUBBLER LEVEL CONTROL SYSTEM The specified coating for the trial polymer storage tank was changed from gel coat to aliphatic polyester polyurethane semi-gloss enamel to provide a more durable exterior coating and minimize maintenance costs. A non-skid walking surface was applied to the top of the new tank to eliminate the slipping hazard. During the time between the design and implementation of work on the P2-37 contract, the Districts found it necessary to overhaul the existing polymer storage tank bubbler level control systems and the ferric chloride flow control systems. Equipment replaced by the Districts was also called out in the P2-37 contract for replacement. Equipment purchased by the Contractor for the above items of work %as turned over to the Districts and the installation of same was deleted. The net credit for this change order item was computed on a lump sum basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)(A) of the General Provisoes. AMOUNT OF CREDIT FOR THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (6,224.00) TINE EXTENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 6 - PIPING AMID DRAINAGE CHANGES AT FERRIC CHLORIDE FACII= The existing Ferric Chloride Facility at Headworks "C" is adjacent to the new Conveyor Building being built by the P2-37 Contractor. Portions of the ferric chloride process piping and tank drain piping interfered with the construction of the north wall of the conveyor building. This change order provides for the re-piping of ferric chloride piping and for the modification of tank drains and vents to eliminate interference with the new Conveyor Building. .Work was performed on a Force Account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,460.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "K-3" AGENDA ITEM #9( 1 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 6 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIH AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALITIORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Eight (8) CONTRACTOR: ZIEBARTH & ALPER DATE June 13, 1990 JOB: MLSCELIANEO S NODIFTCATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT TREAH4eNT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-37 Item 7 - ELECTRICAL POWER FOR CHLCRTNR. SOLUTION METERS Electrical power to operate the new transmitters for the two chlorine solution meters installed by the P2-37 Contractor in the Rollins Tunnel was inadvertently anitted from the specifications. This change on a item provides for power circuitry to the two transmitters. Work was perfumed on a Lump Sum Basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHAtM ORDER II M1: $ 468.00 7TME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 8 - RE[OCACICN OF VFD REACTORS - WASTE ACTIVATED SIUDGE PUMPS The reactors for the variable frequency drives (VED) at each waste activated sludge pump control room were to be mounted on the floor. Installations of other electrical equipment subsequent to design eliminated the apace proposed for reactor installation. This change order item provides for the installation of the two reactors on the will of each pump control room. Work was performed on a Lump Sum Basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisoes. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,527.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER TTIIA: 0 Calendar Days Item 9 - REMOVAL OF CHIORINE SOLUTION b1ETERING SYSTEMS, The two chlorine solution orifice plate type metering systems installed in the tunnel adjacent to the Plant 2 Chlorine Facility did not operate as intended. When installed according to the specificati.ans the restriction created by the orifice plates caused the associated chlorinators to malfunction. As a result of the chlorinator malfunction the chlorine solution was weakened and could not provide the level of chlorine required for the treatment process. This change order item provides for the removal of the pipeline metering devices and returns the solution piping back to its original condition. Work was performed on a Force Account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,596.00 TIME F)MNSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "K-4" AGENDA ITEM #9( i ) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-4" COMM SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUM Page 5 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE --- ECAIITtA' N VALLEY, allalMOUA 92708 �r CHANCE ORDER C. 0. NO. Eight (8) CONTRACTOR: ZIEEARIH & ALPER DATE June 13, 1990 JOB: MISCE[IANBOUS MODIFICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-37 Item 10 - ADDITIONAL PIPE REPIALEMAENf AT EXISTING BELT PRESSES At each of the ten existing belt presses at the Plant 2 Dewatering Facility the Contractor installed new p ller meters to allow the Districts to regulate and measure the flow of wasdmater. The existing washwater piping system was fabricated with galvanized steel pipe and was seriously deteriorated. During the installation of the new meter header piping that was installed in the existing washmater piping system the Contractor had to replace additional port;io:s of the existing system as it was too deteriorated for reuse. This change order item provides for the replacement of additional pipe, valves and fittings at each of the ten belt presses that were not suitable for reuse. Work was performed on a Fbrce Account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,335.00 TDZ EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOM ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 29,190.00 TOTAL TIM EKIEiION THIS CHANCE CRUER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work container within this Change Order can be performed incidental. to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It i-- therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SLI49W OF DIGESTER MILESTONE TIME Original Activity Start Date November 2, 1988 Original Activity Duration 300 Calendar Days Original Activity Ccmpletlo: Date August 28, 1989 Adjustment Milestone Tice This Change Order 0 Calendar Days Total Adjustent Milestone Time 6 Calendar Days Revised Activity Duration 306 Calendar Days Revised Milestone Date September 3, 1989 "K-5" AGENDA ITEM ii9( 1 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-5" COMM SANm kTICN DL=CTS OF ORANGE COUNM Page 6 of 6 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLLS AVENUE FaMAIN VALLEY, xaT.Tsrm A 92708 ORANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Eight (8) CONiFP=: ZIE AlM & ALPER DATE June 13, 1990 JOB: M SCELLANEOUS WDIFICATIONS AND IDIPROMEXIM 7O FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PIKE NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-37 SED69 Y OF CCUTR%.T TDIE Original Contract Date November 2, 1988 Original Contract Time 425 Calendar Days Original Completion Date December 31, 1989 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 129 Caleb Days Revised Contract Time 554 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date May 9, 1990 Actual Final Coupletiot Date Not Applicable Time Subject to rLiqudara Images Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 5,395,000.00 Prey. Auth. Changes $ 349,374.29 This Change (Add) ( ) $ 29,190.00 Amended Contract Price $ 5,773,564.29 Board Authar.zatiaa Date: June 13, 1990 COUNTY SANr=CN DISTRICTS OF OXWN, CALIFC RN1A (I BY: Construction Manager Date Z)EBARTB & ALPER ACCEPTED BY: APPROVED BY: k Date nuectar of Erring Date "K-6" AGENDA ITEM #9( 1) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-6" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA _ P.O. BOX 0127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 ` I N 108{4 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 �Er� II �NOECWn'II (Tt{)962-2411 ii May 23, 1990 Board of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for User and Connection Fee Study with James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers Inc. In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers Inc. for the preparation of a user and connection fee study, on an hourly-rate basis including labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsulta7rts fees and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed $89,549.00. Professional. Services, (hourly rates including labor plus overhead at 1748), not to exceed $66,517.00 Direct Expenses, not to end 4,600.00 Suhconsultannt Fees, not to exceed 5,000.00 Fixed Profit 13,432.00 TOTAL CONMACT, not to exceed $89,549.00 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/A. B. Catlin /s/William Mahoney A. B. Catlin William Mahoney Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Don R. Griffin /s/Don E. Smith Don R. Griffin Don E. Smith Past Joint Chairman Past Joint chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Gary G. Streed /s/Thomas M. Dawes ^ Gary G. Streed Thomas M. Daces Director of Finance Director of Engineering Selection Committee Selection Committee "L" AGENDA ITEM #9(k) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "L" RESOLUTION NO. 90-54 APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JAMES M. MONTGOMERY CONSULTING E G NE R INC. TO CONO A TUDY OF UbtK LAILUUNItb F ESTABLISHING CONNECTION FEE AND USE FEE A A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JAMES M. MONTGOMERY CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. TO CONDUCT A STUDY OF USER CATEGORIES FOR ESTABLISHING RATES FOR DISTRICTS' ONE-TIME CONNECTION FEES AND ANNUAL USE FEES ■ t s t f : . : : x : a p t WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional engineering and architectural services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures an agreement has been negotiated with James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers, Inc. to conduct a study of user categories for establishing rates for Districts' one-time connection fees and annual use fees; and, WHEREAS, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has negotiated and certified the final negotiated fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Professional Services Agreement dated June 13, 1990, by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 and James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers, Inc. , to conduct a study of user categories for establishing rates for Districts' one-time connection fees and annual use fees, is hereby approved and accepted; and, "M-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(k)(2) - ALL DISTRICTS "M-1" Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows: Professional Services, at hourly rates for labor pies overhead at 174%, not to exceed $ E3,517.00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 4,600.00 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 5,000.00 Fixed Profit 13,432.00 TOTAL AMOUNT, not to exceed $ 89,549.OD Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement, on behalf of itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, in form approved by the General . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 13, 1990. "M-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(k) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "M-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-6127 108"ELLIS,FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 ^"ce cW (714) 982-2411 FAX(714)982-0356 I li May 23, 1990 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Martin 8, Kordick, Sr. for Specialized Inspection Services in Connection with construction of Various Master-Planned Projects In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with Martin Kordick, Sr. for Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement for specialized construction inspection services on master-planned construction projects, at hourly rates, plus mileage for on-the-job travel, for a two-year period beginning August 10, 1990. Construction Inspection Services, at the hourly rate of $40.00 for the first year $42.50 for the second year The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/A. B. Catlin /s/william Mahoney A. B. Catlin William Mahoney Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Don R. Griffin /s/Don E. Smith Don R. Griffin Don E. Smith Past Joint Chairman Past Joint Chairman Selection Ccmmittee Selection Committee /s/Thomas M. Dawes Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering Selection Committee "N" AGENDA ITEM #9( l ) (1) z ALL DISTRICTS "N" RESOLUTION NO. 90-55 _ APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MARTIN KORDICK SR. FOR SPECIALIZED N TRU TIN N PE N bEKVR!;F5 RE VAKIUUbTER- PLANNED CONSTRUCTION A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S. 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALiFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MARTIN KORDICK, SR. FOR SPECIALIZED CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SERVICES RE VARIOUS MASTER-PLANNED CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS, PROVIDING FOR EXTENSION OF SAID AGREEMENT AND INCREASING THE HOURLY RATE R f 1 t 1 ! R 1 ► ! t t R � � 1 R WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into a Professional Services Agreement with Martin Kordick, Sr. for specialized construction Inspection services re various master-planned construction projects; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to amend the agreement with Martin Kordick, Sr. to provide for extension of said agreement for an additional two-year period and to increase the hourly rate for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 1 dated June 13, 1990, to that certain Professional Services Agreement dated August 10, 1988, by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 29 3, 5, 6, 79 11, 13 and 14 and Martin Kordick, Sr. , for specialized construction inspection services re various master-planned construction projects, on an as-needed basis, providing for extension of said agreement for for a two-year period beginning August 10, 1990, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said additional services is hereby authorized at the hourly rate of $40.00 for the first year beginning..August 10, 1990, and 110-1" AGENDA ITEM #9( 1 ) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-1" $42.50 for the second year beginning August 10, 1991, plus mileage reimbursement for on-the-job travel : and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 1 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 13, 1990. "0-2" AGENDA ITEM #9( I ) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-2" COUNTY SANITAXION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE CMM Page 1 of 5 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 RTT,TR AVENUE ECUNTAIN VALLEY, CAIIFaWIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Seven (7) OONLRACTOR: W. H. Ebert Corp. DATE June 13, 1990 JOB: Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer. between Edinger Avenue and Lamson Avenue. Contract No. 2-26-2 and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 56.773.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Contract No. 2-26-2. Item 1 CHANGE TRAFFIC PLAN The Contractor was directed to change the traffic detour plan at the intersection of Euclid Street and McFadden Avenue. Due to the large excavation for a structure at Station No. 10+50, southboud traffic on Euclid Street could not pass safely. Therefore, the southbound traffic was detoured to the west at McFadden Avenue. The new detour included costs for engineering, signs, traffic control and labor. This item was acccnplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST TBIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 9,103.00 TIME EXTENSION TBIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 PR40VE DID RAIIRGAD CROSSING The Contractor was directed to excavate and remove a portion of the old railroad Embankment at Station No. 89+00 on Nelson Street. The original alignaeut of the new sewer line on Nelson Street bypassed the remaining portion of the old enbarknent. The sewer alignment was changed when the City could not provide the right-of-way. The new sewer alignment passed through the embankwnt which then had to be renoved. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,941.00 TINE EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "P-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(p) (1) - DISTRICT 2 "P .1" COUNTY SANM=CN nra:wrrrc OF CRAB comer Page 2 of 5 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 RUT AVENUE EX71AII7 VALLEY, OLIE UM 92708 CHANGE ORUM C. 0. NO. Seven (7) CCNTRACTM: W. H. Ebert Corp. DATE June 13, 1990 jcB: Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Ed nnnr Avenue and Ianmson Avemre, Contract No. 2-26-2 and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road between Euclid Street and Walnut Street. Contract No. 2-27 Item 3 EQNI WNT STANDBY The Contractor was directed to stop work between 11-03-89 and 11-10-89 on Nelson Street. Certain utilities had to be relocated prior to excavation for the new sewer line. One of the utilities which bad to be relocated by others was the Southern California Gas Co. This delay was caused by Southern California Gas Co. who'was behind schedule in relocating this 3-inch gas main between Stanford Avenue and Lampson Avenue on Nelson Street. The Contractor's standby changes are for four pieces of major equipment which could not be used elsewhere on the project. There are no labor costs irnrolved. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CERISE CHUM ITEM: $ 15,912.00 TIME EXTEHSICN THIS CBANGE CRDER ITEM: 6 Calendar Days Item 4 UNDISCLOSED nr IEXTraa The Contractor enncomtered several undisclosed utilities at various locations while excavating for the new seder line. The Contractor was directed to investigate and excavate around the undisclosed utilities and to make the necessary repairs. Ebllowing is a tabulation of the additional work: location (Sta. No.) Amount 37+25 30 CMP Culvert $ 1,418.00 10+50 S 119+00 Traffic detector loops 5,106.00 47+46 Abandoned Sub-surface manhole 509.00 50+20 Abandoned 30-inch Stour Drain 853.00 51+00 Concrete-encased telephone duct 2,537.00 54+40 Electrical and telephone conduits 2,533.00 55+19 6-inch water line 1,267.00 4-inch sewer laterals at 9 stations in various locations 1,642.00 6-inch sewer laterals at two locations 595.00 $ 16,460.00 This item was a=zplishad by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANCE CRDER MM: $ 16,460.00 TINE EXTENSION THIS CHANGE CRIM ITEM: 4 Calendar Days "P-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(p) (1) - DISTRICT 2 "P-2" COMM SANITMUN DISTRICTS OF CHANGE COUNPY Page 3 of 5 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 EGT.TR AVENUE EDIRM IN VALLEY, CUaFCRN A 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Seven (7) CONTRAC1C7R: W. H. Ebert Coro. DATE June 13, 1990 JOB: Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and Lanpscn Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2 and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27 Item 5 RENDVE UNDIRCLOSEn SUB-SURFACE CONCRETE The Contractor encountered undisclosed sub-surface concrete while excavating for the new manhole and pipe at Station No. 10+45. The Contractor was directed to remove and dispose of the buried concrete which interfered with the execution and construction of the new manhole. This item was acoomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED CST THIS CHANGE ORDER PPEM: $ 1,935.00 TIM EMENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 6 IMMILL ADZ VACUUM RUIEASR VALVES The Contractor was directed to Install air vacs on a relocated 8-inch dater line. The dater line had to be relocated in order to excavate and construct the new seer line in the specified alignment between Station No. 37+00 and Station No. 44+35 on Taft Avenue. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,300.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 7 8-INCH SEWER BYPASS The Contractor was r Mired to bypass an existing 8-inch sewer during the construction of the new sewer line and manhole at Station No. 49+15. The bypass was intended to be hooked into the new sewer line while constructing the manhole. However, the flows from the bypass could not be put into the new sewer line. The bypass was required to be extended approximately 35 feet to another manhole. This change order item consists of costs for the added material only. This item was acoomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER PPEM: $ 1,295.00 TIME E,XTENSICN THIS CHANGE ORDER TPEM: 0 Calendar Days "P-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(p) (1) - DISTRICT 2 "P-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 5 U P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ECT.rR AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALNPORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Seven M CONTRA=: W. H. Ebert Corp. DATE June 13, 1990 JOB: Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and Lamoson Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2 and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27 Item 8 REPLACE 4-INCH WATER I.II� The Contractor was directed to remove and replace a«rcximately 30 feet of 4-inch water line on Nelson Street at Station No. 93+45. The City of Garden Grove requested that the District's Contractor acccuplish this added work during the construction of the new sewer line. The cost of this item will be reimbursed by the City. This item was accouplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,161.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 9 FUN BYPASSES The Contractor was directed to remove two sewer bypasses which were not included in the contract. The bypasses were installed on upper reaches of the new, Euclid Street trunk sewer on two previous contracts. Now that the lower reach of the new sewer line is complete, flows can be released into the new line. The removal of the bypasses had to be accomplished at night during low flows. This item was acconplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED OUST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,666.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER TI M: 2 Calendar Days TOM ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 56,773.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 12 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be perfumed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Tice made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 12 days' extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be mourned by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. "P-4" AGENDA ITEM #90)(1) - DISTRICT 2 P-4" COUNM SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTr Page 5 of 5 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 SLiSS AVE= FO WMW VALLEY, CMXFMITn 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. Seven (7) CONJRAC10R: W. H. Ebert Corp. DATE June 13, 1990 JOB: Portion of Euclid Interceptor Seiner, between Edinger Avenue and Lm=m Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2 and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27 SUN>MARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date March 22, 1989 Original Contract Tim 365 Calendar Days - Original Completion Date March 22, 1990 Time Extension this C.O. 12 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 73 Calendar Days Revised Contract Tim 438 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date June 3, 1990 Actual Final Completion Date Not applicable Tine Subject to Liquidated Damages Not applicable Original Contract Price $ 9,242,538.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 493,187.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 56,773.00 Amended Contract Price $ 9,792,498.00 Board Authorization Date: June 13, 1990 COUNIR SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORA= COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AECID BY: Construction Manager Date W. H. EBERT CORP. ACCEPTED APPitO<JED BY: /j on actor Date Director of Engineermg Date "P-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(p)(1 ) - DISTRICT 2 "P-5" COM= SANITATION DISMCTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 EC.r.Tc AVENUE PU MMON VALLEY, CAlSFD UM 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Eight (8) CONTRACTOR: W. H. Ebert Coro. DATE June 13. 1990 JOB: Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and Lmpson Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2 and South Anaheim Relief Sewer. on Ball Road between Euclid Street and Walnut Street. Contract No. 2-27 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Beduct) $ 270,519.30 In accordance with cmtract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ADJUSTMENT OF ENG11>BE[2'S QUANTITIES ADD: Change in Item Quantity No. Unit Description Fran To Difference 6 VF 72-inch Manholes 81 86.0 5.00@ $ 750.00 = $ 3,750.00 (2-27) 12 TON Aggregate Base 1600 2713.0 1113.00@ 10.00 = 11,130.00 (2-27) 23 VF 72-inch Manholes 17 19.60 2.60@ 1200.00 = 3,120.00 64 TON Asphalt Concrete 13,800 19,208.91 5408.91@ 30.00 = 162,267.30 65 TON Aggregate Base 27,000 35,259.00 8259.00@ 8.00 = 66,072.00 66 LF Curb and (Utter 910 1,260.00 350.00@ 30.00 = 10,500.00 67 SP Drivecrays 2,020 3,115.00 1095.00@ 14.00 = 15,330.00 SUBTOTAL $272,169.30 DEDUCT- Change in Item Quantity No Unit Description Fran To Difference 30 EA. Field Closure 3 2 (1650.00) SUBTOTAL ( 1,650.00) TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANM ORDER $270,519.30 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days "0-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(p) (2) - DISTRICT 2 "0 1" OODNN SAWIM rON DISMCTS OF ORWM Q70NTY Page 2 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 EDLIS AVENGE FSRINTA' N VALLEY, CALIFaVaA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Eight (8) COM?ALTOR: W. R. Ebert Corn. DATE June 13. 1990 JOB: Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Fdinoer Avenue and Iampson Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2 and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Ordcer, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor. SUKIP Y OF CONPRAC.T TIM Original Contract Date March 22, 1989 Original Contract Time 365 Calendar Days Original Completion Date March 22, 1990 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 73 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 438 Days Revised Final Completion Date June 3, 1990 Actual Final Completion Date June 3, 1990 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not applicable Original Contract Price $ 9,242,538.00 Prey. Auth. Changes $ 549,960.00 This Change (Add) (Dedwt) $ 270,519.30 Amended Contract Price $10,063,017.30 "Q-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(p)(2) - DISTRICT 2 "0-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Eight (8) CONTRACTOR: W. H. Ebert Corp. DATE June JOB: Portion of Euclid Interce for Sewer between Edin er Avenue and Lam son Avenue, Contract o. an ou na e m e e ewer on a oa etween Euclid Street an a nut treet, Contract No. 2-27 Board Authorization Date: June 13, 1990 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDED BY: on�rucflon manager Date W.H. EBERT CORP. ACCEPTED BY: APPRO BY: GrT' � ti a /;: .,-,z�wi^t.i (l. il!!f. � ntrac a e t rector of Engineering a e V "Q 4, AGENDA ITEM #9(p) (2) - DISTRICT 2 "0-3" s . RESOLUTION NO. 90-59-2 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NOS. 2-26-2 AND 2-27 A MPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 'OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING PORTION OF EUCLID INTERCEPTUR SEWER, BETWEEN EDINGER AVENUE AND LAMPSON AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 2-26-2, AND SOUTH ANAHEIM RELIEF SEWER, ON BALL ROAD BETWEEN EUCLID STREET AND WALNUT STREET, CONTRACT NO. 2-27, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor. W. H. Ebert Corp. , has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and Lampson Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2, and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27, on April 23, 1990; and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Director of Engineering has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and Lampson Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2, and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated March 22, 1989; and, Section 4. That the Districts' Director of Engineering is hereby "R 1" AGENDA ITEM #9(p) (3) - DISTRICT 2 "R-1" authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with W. H. Ebert Corp. setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and Lampson Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2, and South Anaheim Relief Sewer on Ball Road between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27, is hereby approve] and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel ; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 2 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 13, 1990. "R-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(P)(3) - DISTRICT 2 "R-2" RESOLUTION NO. 90-60-2 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACT NOS. 2-26-3. 2-28 AND 2-29 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PORTION OF EUCLID INTERCEPTOR SEWER, BETWEEN BROADWAY AND ORANGETHORPE AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 2-26-3; KATELLA RELIEF SEWER, FETWEEN EUCLID STREET AND WALNUT STREET, CONTRACT NO. 2-28; AND ORANGEWOOD DIVERSION SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-29 k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k WHEREAS, Willdan Associates, District's engineers, have completed preparation of the plans and specifications for Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, Between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-3; Katella Relief Sewer, Between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-28; and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the project for construction of Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, Between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-3; Katella Relief Sewer, Between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-28; and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29, is hereby approved. Said project was included in the Final Focused Environmental Impact Report on Amendment No. 1 to the Consolidated Master Plan of Treatment Facilities for Districts Nos. 2, 3 and it relative to District No. 2 Euclid/Newhope-Placentia Drainage Area approved by the Board of Directors on June 10, 1987. A Notice of Determination was filed by the Secretary on June 11, 1987, in accordance with the District's Guidelines Implementing the California "S-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(q) - DISTRICT 2 "S-1" Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and, `...� Section 2. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submittea to the Board of Directors by Willdan Associates, District's engineers, for construction of Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, Between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-3; Katella Relief Sewer, Between Euclid Street aid Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-28; and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 3. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Public Contracts Code of the State of California; and, Section 4. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 5. That the Secretary and the District's Director of Engineering or. his designee be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 13, 1990. "S-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(q) - DISTRICT 2 "S-2" RESOLUTION NO. 90-61-2 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH KRAEMER IMPERIAL ASSOCIATES .. RELATIVE TO EXCHANGE EASEMENTS D AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF QUITCLAIM DEED RE CYPRESSAVENUE SUBYIU K E!F—SSW K,CONIRAL;Y NU. Z-V/Z-UA— A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH KRAEMER IMPERIAL ASSOCIATES RELATIVE TO EXCHANGE OF EASEMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH REALIGNMENT OF A PORTION OF THE CYPRESS AVENUE SUBTRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-9 (REALIGNED PORTION ENTITLED 2-9A) , AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF CORPORATION QUITCLAIM DEED QUITCLAIMING DISTRICT'S INTEREST IN A PORTION OF THE ORIGINAL SEWER LINE AND EASEMENT THEREFOR FROM KRAEMER IMPERIAL ASSOCIATES 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Agreement dated June 13, 1990, by and between County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County and Kraemer Imperial Associates, relative to an easement required in connection with a realigned portion of the Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9 (Realignment entitled Contract No. 2-9A) , in exchange for a quitclaim deed quitclaiming the District's interest in the original sewer line and easement therefor from Kraemer Imperial Associates, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the certain Corporation Quitclaim Deed dated June 13, 1990, wherein County Sanitation District No. 2 quitclaims to Kraemer Imperial Associates the District's interest in a portion of the original sewer line and 20-foot wide easement therefor from Kraemer Imperial Associates, is hereby approved and authorized; and, Section 3. That the real property to be quitclaimed is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of "T 1" AGENDA ITEM #9(r) - DISTRICT 2 "T-I" this resolution; and, Section 4. That said Quitclaim Deed is hereby granted at no cost to Kraemer Imperial Associates; and, Section 5. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 2 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreement and Corporation Quitclaim Deed in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 13, 1990. "T-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(r) - DISTRICT 2 "T-2" GD&EDEVELOPMENT COMSULTANT& INC. April 11, 1990 Mr. Gary Streed Director of Finance Orange County Sanitation Districts P.O.Box 8127 Fountain Valley,California 92728-8127 Dear Mr.Streed: In your letter of March 30, 1990 and telephone conversations you have stated that the Orange County Sanitation Districts will be requesting a 100%pass-through with the proposed Lincoln Avenue Redevelopment Project and Los Alamitos Race Track and Golf Course Redevelopment Project, both in the City of Cypress. Based on the numbers you supplied, the Redevelopment Agency is prepared to offer the Districts a 35% pass-through on the Los Alamitos Race Track and Golf Course Redevelopment Project. The percentage of pass-through was determined in the following manner: The Districts stated that the cost in present day dollars to collect, treat and dispose of the additional sewage generated by the Los Alamitos Race Track and Golf Course Redevelopment Project when developed (over the next 12 years) would be $41,532. If we are to increase that amount for inflation at 5% per year (the assumption we used for our tax increment calculations), then the amount would reach$74,586 in the year of projected buildout. If we subtract the base year amount (the amount the Districts will continue to receive throughout the life of the Project, or $18,885) from the inflated total we show that the Districts require an additional $55,701 to meet the increased needs of the Project area in year 12. - 150 W. first 61rccL 6uilc 280 ClaremonL CA 91711-4139 (714) 625-6734 "V 1"" AGENDA ITEM #9( t) (1 ) - DISTRICT 3 "V-1'" Mr. Gary Streed April 11, 1990 Page 2 The Orange County Sanitation Districts now receive 3.1% of the taxes generated in the Project Area. Given the Districts' portion of the tax increment in year 12 (3.1%of$5,145,065, or$159,497),the additional amount required by the Districts is approximately 35%of the total that is estimated to be generated by the Project. This pass-through for the Los Alamitos Race Track and Golf Course Redevelopment Project would be in lieu of the 2% annual inflationary increase that is specified in California Health and Safety Code, Section 33676. In order to maintain economic feasibility for the Lincoln Avenue Redevelopment Project, the Cypress Redevelopment Agency is not offering the Districts any pass- through for that Project. It is expected, however, that the Districts shall adopt a resolution capturing the 2% inflationary increase in taxes for the Lincoln Avenue Redevelopment Project. If you have any questions about the calculations presented in this letter, or have any comments on the negotiations,please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, nc Curtis Dale Senior Associate xc: Darrell Essex,City Manager "V-2` AGENDA ITEM #9(t) (1) - DISTRICT 3 "V-2" RESOLUTION NO. 90-62-3 �./ APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH THE CYPRESS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH THE CYPRESS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RE PAYMENT OF PROPORTIONAL ANNUAL TAX INCREMENT TO DISTRICT FOR SEWERAGE SERVICES x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x WHEREAS, the Cypress Redevelopment Agency has proposed the Los Alamitos Race Track and Golf Course Redevelopment Project; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Community Redevelopment Law, California Health and Safety Code Sections 33000 at sec . , the Sanitation District' s ad valorem taxes in the redevelopment project area will be frozen at the 1989-90 base year levy; all subsequent annual tax increments accruing to the redevelopment agency during its life; and, WHEREAS, because the Sanitation District partially relies on ad valorem taxes to finance the cost of sewerage services which are escalating due to federally mandated requirements, energy impacts and inflationary trends; and, WHEREAS, recognizing that the freezing of taxes may result in inadequate ad valorem tax revenues to cover the cost of providing sewerage service to the redevelopment project areas, representatives of the Cypress Redevelopment Agency have agreed to pay the District thirty-five percent ( 35%) of its historical proportional share of the annual tax increment accruing to the agency to defray the cost of said service, on the same basis as other properties in the `./ District. "W-1'" AGENDA ITEM #9( t) (2) - DISTRICT 3 "W-1" NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Agreement dated by and between County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County and the Cypress Redevelopment Agency, providing for payment to the - District of thirty-five percent ( 35%) of its historical proportional share of the annual tax increment from property in the proposed Los Alamitos Race Track and Golf Course Redevelopment Project to pay for escalating costs of sewerage service on the same basis as other properties in the District, be, and is hereby, approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of District No. 3 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 13, 1990. "W-2" AGENDA ITEM #9( t ) (2) - DISTRICT 3 "W-2" RESOLUTION NO. 90-63-3 ELECTING TAX INCREMENT PASS-THROUGH RE �✓ LINCOLN AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ELECTING TAX INCREMENT PASS-THROUGH RE LINCOLN AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT k X k k k k k X k k k k k k k X WHEREAS, the Cypress Redevelopment Agency is preparing a Development Plan for the Lincoln Avenue Redevelopment Project (the "Plan" ) , which provides for tax increment financing pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33670; and, WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. 3 (the "District" ) is an affected taxing agency authorized to make the election described in Health and Safety Code Section 33676. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That the District elects to be allocated all of the tax revenues attributable to increases in the rate of tax imposed for the benefit of the District, which levy occurs after the tax year in which the ordinance adopting the Plan becomes effective, and elects to be allocated all of the tax revenues attributable to increases in the assessed value of the taxable property in the Lincoln Avenue Redevelopment Project Area, as the assessed value is established by the assessment roll last equalized prior to the effective date of the ordinance adopting the Plan pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33670(a) , which are or otherwise would be, calculated annually pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 110.1 (f) . "X 1" AGENDA ITEM a9(t)(3) - DISTRICT 3 "X-1" Section 2: That the Board Secretary of the District is hereby authorized and directed to transmit copies of this Resolution to the appropriate officials and to �.ake all other actions required pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33676 to implement the election set forth in this Resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 13, 199o. "X-2" AGENDA ITEM #9( t ) (3) - DISTRICT 3 "X-2" RESOLUTION NO. 90-64-5 AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 5-35-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SOUTH COAST TRUNK SEWER, PHASE I, CONTRACT NO. 5-35-1 f f f f f 1 f f Y f f f f f Y The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the proposed construction contract is for a project which is a portion of the previously-approved Master Plan Report for District No. 5 and the Southern Half of District No. 6. The project is to be constructed as per the Master Plan approval. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and Section 15090 of the Districts' Guidelines, a Final Environmental Impact Report covering this project was approved by the Districts' Boards of Directors on June 13, 1984; and, Section 2. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Board of Directors by the District's Director of Engineering that award of contract be made to W. H. Ebert Corp• for South Coast Trunk Sewer, Phase I. Contract No. 5-35-1, and bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That the contract for South Coast Trunk Sewer, Phase I, Contract No. 5-35-1, be awarded to W. H. Ebert Corp• in the total amount of $880,066.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor "Y 1" AGENDA ITEM #9(u)(2) - DISTRICT 5 "Y 1" for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel ; and, ,ection S. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 13, 1990. 1a.r� "Y-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(u) (2) - DISTRICT 5 "Y-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS May 15, 1990 21 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 11:00 a.m. 1 ADDEND M +oau 2wa Avewu• B I D TABULATION w WMN VA62Y.MWORNIA W1204121 S EEET glA' A 211 CONTRACT NO. 5-35-1 PPLUECT TTTf.Tt South Coast Trunk Sewer, Phase I PROMEL' DESCRi CN Construct approximately 4200 feet of 15- to 24-inch DIP and VCP gravitV trunk sewer, manholes, stubs and laterals on the land side of PCH from the city limits of Newport Beach southeast to just west of Los Trancos narking lot ENGINEER'S ESTE n'rr.: $1,290,000 BUDGET ANDIMT $1,400,000 (1989-90 Budget) CONIRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. W. H. Ebert Corp. , San Jose, CA $ 880,066.00 2. Mike PrLich & Sons, South El Monte, CA $ 946,860.00 3. Colich & Sons (JV) , Gardena, CA $1,054,522.00 4. Kenko Inc. dba nrt rand & Assoc., CaYinana, CA $1,072,850.00 5. Peter C. David Co., 7nc., Garden Grove. CA $1,141,092.00 6. Silveri & LeBouef JV, Anaheim, CA $1,179,670.00* 7. Drainage Construction Co. , Inc., Vista, CA $1,261,912.00 B. C E Puny & Dewatering Corp. dba C R Construction $1,279,139.50* Signal Hill, CA 9. Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Im., Sunland, CA $1,288,299.00 10. Miraonrtes Const. Co., Inc., Baldwin Park, CA $1,366,398.00 11. Steve Bubalo Construction Co. , Monrovia. CA $1,384,105.00 *Mathematical error—corrected total. I have reviewed the proposals submitted-for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, razcnclend award to W. H. Ebert Corp. of San Jose, CA in the bid aupunt of $880,066.00 as the lowest and best bid. b.w, Thomas M. Dawes Director of EngirnesIng "Y-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(u) (2) - DISTRICT 5 "Y-3" - PCH SEWER CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING This Memorandum of Understanding is intcaded to set forth certain understandings of The Irvine Company ("Company") and County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California ("District") related to the construction, connection and timing of certain sewer facilities to serve the Company's Newport Coast Project. The Company and the District desire to set forth their understanding about the scheduling of construction of such sewer facilities in order to minimize the impact of such construction work upon residents, merchants and other users of Pacific Coast Highway in a manner that is consistent with the spirit of Resolution 88-121 (attached) of the City Council of the City of Newport Beach ("City") . THE BACKGROUND Irvine Ranch Water District ("IRWD") is responsible for providing local collector sewer service to the Company's Newport Coast Project. As part of the work required to serve IRWD and upgrade the existing District system, the District will construct a gravity sewer between the southerly City limits and Marguerite Avenue to tie into the Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer. This sewer project is designated by District as Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-34-3 (the "PCH Sewer Project") . The Company, the District, the City and other parties desire that the PCH Sewer Project have as little as possible negative impact upon the residents and merchants of Corona Del Mar ("CDM") and the other users of the affected section of PCH. Of particular concern is the "CDM Commercial Area" which lies along PCH and stretches from Marguerite Avenue to Seward Avenue. As part of the Newport Coast Project, a new arterial roadway known as Pelican Hill Road is being constructed including a signal and appropriate signage at the intersection of Pelican Hill Road and PCH. Upon the opening of Pelican Hill Road, it is expected that traffic congestion will be reduced along PCH through CDM. The City Council of the City of Newport Beach has previously adopted Resolution 88-121 indicating the Council's opposition to the commencement of the portion of the PCH Sewer Project under PCH in CUM prior to the completion of Pelican Hill Road through to Bonita Canyon Road. Although the. provision of sewer service to the Newport Coast Project is being undertaken by IRWD, IRWD is working "Z 1" AGENDA ITEM #9(v) - DISTRICT 5 "Z 1" closely with the District and the City to provide for the use by IRWD of sewer facilities controlled by such 'agencies as part of the overall sewer servicing plan fir the Newport Coast Project. UNDERSTANDINGS In light of the background described above, Company and District hereby affirm their mutual understanding with respect to the following key points: *At the request of the City, no construction of the PCH Sewer Project will be commenced prior to the opening of the Pelican Hill Road and the commencement of operation of the signal at the intersection of Pelican Hill Road and PCH. Pelican Hill Road and signal are expected to be open and operational by July 1, 1991. *Subject to the receipt of necessary permits and any other items which are beyond the control of the District, the District plans anticipate that the PCH Sewer Project will be bid and contract let prior to July 1, 1991 in order to allow construction to commence immediately upon the opening of Pelican Hill Road. *The District estimates that the PCH Sewer Project construction in the CDM Commercial Area will be complete within 90 days after commencement. *PCH Sewer Project construction is expected to begin in July, 1991 and be complete in the CDM Commercial Area by November 1, 1991. *No construction of the PCH Sewer Project in the CDM Commercial Area will take place during the Christmas season from November 1 through January 1. PCH Sewer Project construction is planned to continue from Seward Avenue to the southerly City limits without such time constraint. *Some night construction work is anticipated in order to minimize the duration of construction and negative impact. *The District will cooperate in obtaining City approval of connection and capacity in the City sewer system to accommodate IRWD service for the Newport Coast Project. *To provide the Company with interim sewer connections to insure timely capacity for the early phases of the Newport Coast Project by February, 1991, the Company will fund the design and construction of (i) the interim pump station and the connection thereto at 2 "Z-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(v) - DISTRICT 5 "Z-2" Garret and Cortland, (ii) the upgrade of the CUM Pump Station at Poppy and (iii) any required modifications to the CUM iumn Station force main. The costs for such work are estimated by the District at $200,000, however, the Company agrees to pay the actual charges therefor. Company and District agree to work cooperatively with the City and IRwD in order to cause the implementation of the sewer servicing plan for the Newport Coast Project in a manner consistent with this Memorandum of Understanding. The Irvine Company, a Michigan corporation By: Title: By: Title: Sanitation District No. 5 of orange County, California By: Title: By. Title: 2242S2;5/16/90 3 "Z-3" AGENDA ITEM k9(v) - DISTRICT 5 "Z-3" RESOLUTION NO. 90-65-7 AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS AND FILING OF APPLICATION TO LAFCO RE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY T OISTRI T N 7 ANNEXATIO V�. 1'3 - W LLIAMS ANNEXATI N A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS AND REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION TO THE DISTRICT OF TERRITORY KNOWN AS ANNEXATION NO. 135 - WILLIAMS ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That proceedings are hereby authorized to be initiated by District No. 7, and the Local Agency Formation Commission of Orange County is hereby requested to take proceedings for the annexation of territory designated as "Annexation No. 135 - Williams Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7", the boundaries of which are more particularly described and delineated on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution, according to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth in this resolution in the manner provided by the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985; and, Section 2. That this proposal is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Division 3, commencing with Section 56000 of the California Government Code; and, Section 3. That this application is for the purpose of annexing approximately 2.50 acres of territory to District No. 7 in the vicinity of the southeast corner of the intersection of Lemon Heights Drive and Lower Lake Drive "AA-I" AGENDA ITEM #9(x) - DISTRICT 7 "AA-I" in unincorporated County territory, to provide sanitary sewer service to said territory, which said service is not now provided by any public agency, as requested by Donald R. Williams and Sharon V. Williams, owners of said property; and, Section 4. That the territory to be annexed is uninhabited; and, Section S. That this proposal is consistent with the adopted sphere of Influence of the affected District; and, Section 6. That proposed Annexation No. 135 - Williams Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 shall be subject to the condition that all fees required to be paid to the District must be satisfied prior to completion of the annexation proceedings; and, Section 7. That the District hereby agrees, pursuant to Section 99.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other affected taxing agencies. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 13, 1990. "AA-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(x) - DISTRICT 7 "AA-2" RESOLUTION NO. 90-56 `../ APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO AGREEMENT WITH SAIC FOR OCEAN MONITORING CONTRACT SERVICES FOR CSDOC 120-IN H OCEAN OUTFAL . SPECIFICATION NS-032 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO AGREEMENT WITH SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION (SAIL) FOR OCEAN MONITORING CONTRACT SERVICES FOR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 120-INCH OCEAN OUTFALL, SPECIFICATION NO. 5-032, EXTENDING CONTRACT FROM JULY 1, 1990 TO JUNE 30, 1991 WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 120-Inch Ocean Outfall , Specification No. 5-032; and, WHEREAS, Amendment No. 1 provided for the acquisition of additional laboratory instrumentation and authorized additional laboratory work to perform analyses on ocean sediments for trace constituents to comply with additional requirements imposed by the Environmental Protection Agency; and, WHEREAS, Amendment No. 2 provided for modifications to the Current Monitoring Program required by EPA; and, WHEREAS, Amendment No. 3 extended the contract from July 1, 1986, to June 30, 1987; and, WHEREAS, Amendment No. 4 extended the contract from July 1, 1987 to June 30, 1988; and, WHEREAS, Amendment No. 5 extended the contract from July 1, 1988 to June 30, 1989 and provided for program modifications for the contract period from July 1, 1987 through June 30, 1988 as well as the fourth year of said contract, July 1, 1988 through June 30, 1989; and provided for a reduction in "BB-1" AGENDA ITEM #13(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "BB-1" fees to be negotiated for years one, two and three of said contract; and, WHEREAS, Amendment No. 6 extended the contract from July 1, 1989 to June 30, 1990; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend the agreement to extend the existing contract from July 1, 1990 to June 30, 1991; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with the established procedures for selection of professional engineering and architectural services, the Selection Committee has negotiated and certified a fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Amendment No. 7 dated July 1, 1990, to that certain agreement dated August 7, 1985, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11. 13 and 14, for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 120-Inch Ocean Outfali , Specification No. S-032, providing for extension of the existing contract from July 1, 1990 through June 30, 1991 (Contract Period Six), is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be Increased by $1,821,365.00 for the sixth year of said contract, increasing the total authorized compensation from $7,839,093.00 to $9,660,458.00; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for Itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Amendment No. 7 in form approved by the General Counsel . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 13, 1990. "BB-2" AGENDA ITEM #13(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "BB-2" RESOLUTION NO. 90-58 `J APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS T COND T A FOUL AIR TREATMENT OPTIMI TI N S DY A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS TO CONDUCT A FOUL AIR TREATMENT OPTIMIZATION STUDY WHEREAS, the Districts have completed the installation of foul air collection and deodorizing facilities at both treatment plants; and, WHEREAS, said facilities were built and operate under separate permits with numerous conditions issued by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD); and, WHEREAS, it is deemed desirable to conduct a study to make recommendations to clarify certain ambiguous provisions of said SCAQMD permits relative to _ operation and discharge conditions, and to enhance the odor control system to operate more effectively and efficiently; and, WHEREAS, the Executive Committee .has recommended that John Carollo Engineers be engaged to conduct the study inasmuch as they have previously worked an many of the odor control systems and are available to begin work immediately on the necessary study. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the proposed Professional Services Agreement dated , by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County and John Carollo Engineers, providing for "CC-1" AGENDA ITEM #15(b)(6) - ALL DISTRICTS "CC-1" services to conduct a foul air treatment optimization study, is hereby approved and accepted; and, �..� Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows: Professional Services, at hourly rates for labor plus overhead at 155%, not to exceed $ 65.000.00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 3,000.00 Subconsultant Fees 10,000.00 Fixed Profit 7,000.00 TOTAL, not to exceed $ 85,000.00 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 13, 1990. "CC-2" AGENDA ITEM H15(b)(6) - ALL DISTRICTS "CC-2" SONNENSCHEIN NATH 8 ROSENTHAL 211 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD \� CHICAGO SUITE 21M (213)820-2000 NEW YORK LOS ANOELES, CALIFORNIA 900,7 FACSIMILE SAN FRANCISCO (213)9212924 sr LOUIS June 6, 1990 .ASHINGTON.Mo. DIRECT LIVE (213) 623-0057 Mr. Wayne Sylvester General Manager Orange County Sanitation Districts 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 Dear Wayne: At your request, we are proposing to represent the Orange . County Sanitation Districts as special counsel for personnel and labor relations matters. our representation would be limited to the following subjects: 1. Advice and representation in meet and conferral matters with employee organizations. 2. Advice regarding legal matters arising in regard to employee organizations representing or attempting to represent OCSD employees. 3. Advice and representation regarding matters dealing with employment, retention and termination of employees including equal employment opportunity, wrongful termination, grievances and arbitrations. As always, we would continue to work with and consult the Districts general counsel, Rourke 6 Woodruff. 1. Fees, We will bill you on an hourly rate basis at the rate of one hundred fifty dollars per hour. 2. costs, often it is necessary for us to incur expenses for items such as copying, travel, lodging, meals, telephone calls, and transcripts. When we incur these expenses, we list them separately as disbursements_ 3. Billings, Our statements are prepared and mailed monthly. We ask our clients to approve and pay these bills upon presentation. In the event our clients do not pay bills on presentation, we charge 18 interest per month beginning with the sixtieth day after presentation. In the event of a dispute "DD-1" AGENDA ITEM #17 - ALL DISTRICTS "DD-1" SONNENSCHEIN NATH 6 ROSENTHAL Mr. Wayne Sylvester , June 5, 1990 Page Two �✓ regarding the amount, you and the firm agree that the prevailing party is entitled to attorney's fees in any dispute resolution proceeding. 4. Right of Termination. You have the right to terminate our representation at any time. We have the same right subject to an obligation to give you reasonable notice to arrange other counsel. It is anticipated that this contract will be reviewed annually by both parties. If after you have reviewed this letter you have any questions or if at any time in our representation of you there are questions about our services, we would appreciate it if you would raise them immediately. Please initial one copy of this letter and return it to US. 1 yours, E ATERSON LTP:jw WAYNE SYLVESTER GENERAL MANAGER "DD-2" AGENDA ITEM #17 - ALL DISTRICTS "DD-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS June 5, 1990 a1 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 1=44 ELLi9 AVENUE 10,Box 912] ` ' IOYMNN V4IEY,C.UNDnNA 921204127 AEI 9141962-2411 Staff Report County Sanitation Districts Nos. 3 and 11 Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvelrents Contract No. 11-17 Project Report for Slater PL= Station Improvements At the regular May board meeting, the Directors received and discussed a project report on needed improvements to the Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System. The first phase inptvvem ms include the construction of the new, master-planned pump station and inlet pipe and discharge facilities, at an estimated cost of appro: ;mately $7.6 million dollars. (Additional facilities serving only District 11 will be separately designed and constructed in the future in accordance with the Master Plan.) In June 1989 the District 11 Board engaged John Camllo Engineers to prepare the project report relative to Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements. Subsequent to that, the Joint Boards of Directors adopted the new 30-year master plan which identifies the improvements as a joint project of Districts 3 and 11. The new nester plan will realize considerable savings to both Districts over the previous master plan which provided for sewaring the tributary areas through the Coast Trunk Sewer. Last month the Boards of Districts 3 and 11 approved the project report for the Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17, prepared by John Carollo Engineers, and also approved an agreement between the Districts providing for finaOcing, design, construction, capacity ownership (based on flows) and operation of certain master-planned sewage collection facilities serving Districts 3 and 11, including the Slater Avenue Pump Station system. Boise. Chios Service Capacity Included within the drainage area originally anticipated to be served by the Slater Avenue Pump Station is 1,608 acres of land south of Iva Patos Avenue and southeasterly of Warner Avenue, generally known as the Bolas Chita. In April 1987 the Directors of District 11 authorized staff and General Counsel to negoddate an annexation agreement with the property owners. The Signal Bolsa corporation is the principal landowner and the Board's action was nxursuaIlt to Signal Bolsa's request. The Bolsa Chita area is presently outside the boundary of District 11 but within its sphere of influence. Signal Bolsa principals and counsel and Districts' staff and counsel have met numerous times over tie past several years in an attempt to came to a preannenmtion agreement. The last draft of the proposed agreement provided for the anneGation of the Bolsa Chita `..� area and prepayment of fees for those areas to be developed by Signal Bolsa to "EE-1" AGENDA ITEM #34(b) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "EE-1" provide the necessary funding for constriction of capacity in the Slater Avenue Pump Station system to serve the Bolas Chica if and when it is annexed. However, Signal Bolsa Corporation is not yet ready to annex and recently advised staff that they are no longer willing to proceed with the proposed preanneration —.. agreement. If capacity for the Bolas Chita is not included in the Slater Amp Station system, Signal Boles would have to construct sewer lines through the Bolas Chica area and tie into the Districts' Coast Trunk Sewer at a cost that would be substantially higher than putting up the money now for capacity in the Slater Pump Station system. Eluding and construction of such facilities to connect to the Districts' Coast Trunk Sewer wild have to be provided by the property owners/developers. Secause of the urgent need to proceed with design and construction of the facilities, staff has previously notified Signal Bolsa Corporation that they mist make a decision by May 16, 1990 on the prevmexation agreement, and that without such an agreement the Districts could provide no assurance that the area could be annexed or provided sewerage service by the Districts in the future. Attached for the Directors' information is a Signal letter dated April 25, 1990 and two District letters dated May 2 and May 23, 1990. Signal has not responded to our letters. At the May Board meeting it was the consensus of the Directors that unless a preannexation agree,mnt is executed by the Bolas Chita property owners, capacity to serve the area should not be included in the Districts' sewage system. The existing facilities are at capacity, thus it is now necessary to proceed with design and construction of the Slater Avenue Pimp Station system. The Districts cannot delay the project any longer waiting for Signal Bolsa Corporation to make up its mind on the issue of annexation. Authorization for Final Design and Construction Services for Slater Avenue Frog Station Sewage System improvements The agreement executed last year between District 11 and Carollo for the aforementioned project report on Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements also provides for final design and construction services, to be negotiated upon completion of the project report which was approved by the Boards last month. Accordingly, the recommended action is to authorize the Selection Committee (ChaiMMent of both Districts 3 and 11) to negotiate an addendum to the contract with John Carollo Engineers for final design and construction services for the Slater Avenue Amp Station Sewage System Improvements. Following the Selection C®nittes's nw.0tiations, the proposed addeuxhmm will be presented to the Boards for consideration. A final decision on the capacity of the Slater Amp Station System will be made at the time the design is authorizcd by the Boards. -2_ �../ "EE-2" AGENDA ITEM #34(b) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "EE-2" SIGNAL LANDMARK Joe J.Slarkn Senior V=-Pmsiaent Lano De tvMem April 25, 1990 Mr.Thomas M.Dawes ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT P.O.Box 8127 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 RE: Bolo Chid Annexation Dear Tom: I appreciated the chance to meet with you and Clark Ide last week concerning our Bolsa Chien project. As I indicated in the meeting, our desire to amen to District No. 11 Sanitation District has not changed What we are facing is the delay in our processing schedule that will push our needs for sewer capacity out to 1995. In light of that, we are asking the District to work with us on an annexation agreement that reflects our current schedule. We are prepared to move ahead with an agreement with the Sanitation District,assuming we can work out some of the concerns that we have with the current language. In terms of dollar commitments, we are prepared to move ahead based on paying our proportional share of the projected design fees at this time. My understanding from our meeting last week was that the design effort was to cost a total of S600,000, with our capacity being 10% of the tonal design capacity of the system. We would therefore be will* to pay$W,000 at this time,with the balance due at the time we annex to the City of Huntington Beach. We feel that this would show good faith on our part in participating in the design efforts, while assuring you that as soon as the project is approved we will pay the balance of our annexation fees and move toward the development of our project and the eventual payment of our hook-up fees. If you find the above proposal acceptable please contact Lucy Dunn at our office and we will immediately begin working out the necessary modifications to the agreement in order to meet your deadline for the June Sanitation Board meeting. Yours truly, SIGNAL LANDMARK Joe J.�Smclier % Sr.LVice pYesident JJS:jm a: Lucetta Dunn Carl Neuhauscn 17890Skyaark Ciroe lmne.CA 927M 74-261-0360 FAX7M-M-1902 "EE-3" AGENDA ITEM #34(b) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "EE-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 9127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 9272"127 10944 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92708.7018 4. 1 (714)962.2411 FAX(n4)952-0356 May 2, 1990 Mr. Joe J. Stucker, Senior Vice President, . Iand Development Signal Landmark 17890 Skypark Circle Irvine, CA 92714 Dear Mr. Stucker: Subiect: Preannexation Avreement. for Bolsa Chita This letter is a follow up to our m9eting two weeks ago regarding the annexation of Bolsa Chita to County Sanitation District No. 11 (CSD 11), and a response to your April 25, 1990 letter. For some four or five years your company and CSD 11 have been discussing the development of Bolsa Chic, and your desire to annex Bolsa Chita to CSD 11 in order to receive sewer service. Those discussions have resulted in several drafts of a preannexation agreement. The final version was concluded last month for signature and was intender) to be presented to our Board of Directors this month. The pxeatmelmtion agreement was based On our understanding of Signal's commitment in our many meetings. It assured your company that annexation would be allaw d and provided for payment of fees to CSD 11 under a time schedule contained within the agreement necessary to provide needed funds for capacity in the Districts' sewerage system to serve the Bolsa Chita. As presently envisioned and in accordance with the 1989 Master Plan adopted in July 1989, sewage generated by the proposed annexation and development of Bolsa Chica would be directed to Cm Lines in Warner Avenue, Springdale Avenue, Slater Avenue, and to a new Slater Avenue Puup Station located between Golden West Street and Gothard Street on the south side of Slater Avenue. you have recently indicated that you do not intend to proceed with execution of the preannexation agreement at this time, primarily because of the fee schedule contained therein. In lieu of the fee schedule, which provided for payment of all annexation fees within one year (about $1.8 - $2,0 million, depending on the actual size of the area to be annexed), you are proposing to pay the nominal amount of $60,000 for engineering w•uk. Based on Signal's early cmmttnents to execute an agreement and pay the necessary funds to provide city in its sewerage system for the Bolsa Chita, CSD 11, in good faith, has delayed proccscing with needed master plan facilities design and constriction and alternative financing. CSD 11 can no longer hold "EE-4" AGENDA ITEM #34(b) - DISTRICTS 3 a 11 "EE-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTHIOTs of ORANGE COUN Y. CAUFORNIA low E s'l,,ME Oo.eox 6127 \_W/ lMWM VG ..G K MG 92Y2s812] Joe J. Stucker ma�ssz¢an May 1, 1990 Page Mm its program in abeyance while Signal cantimies to vacillate on this matter. The District must proceed immediately with the construction of the urgently needed facilities and we mist advise you that unless the pream>e>oation agreement as last stutmitted by the District is executed by May 16, 1990, the District has no alternative but to proceed without provisions to serve the Bolsa Chic- area. As you know from cur previous discussions, the District simply cannot includ Capacity in its facilities for the Bolsa China, which is not now in the District, unless the funding for such capacity is put up by Signal . If the agreement is signed we can include capacity in the proposed sewage collection improvements for the eventual develcgaent of Boles Ch:.ca. In the event you elect not to sign the preannexitiom agreement and wish to develop the area at a later date, there would be only one way to obtain sewer service for the Bolsa Arica as discussed with you at cur last ,meting. That would be the rcnvtructirn of conveyance facilities which world deliver wastewExter to the Sanitation nist, cts' Coast 'Runk Sews which terminates at Orange Avenue and Golden West Street. r,nstr ucti an of these facilities would best he made within the rarfield Connector to the Bolsa China easterly bluff where a pump station would need to be constructed and then to Orange Avenue and Go1dan West Street. We must reiterate that the are not master-planned facilities and, therefore, you are hereby advised that CSD 11 will not finance, design, ccnsttvct or maintain any of these facilities. Finally, as you knew, under either alternative, your cmpany would have to pay identazal annexation and connection charges as established by the Boards of Directors. If you have any questions I'm available to met with you at any time. Wl yore lZE Th®s M. Dawes Director of t]lginee nng TMD:jt cc: General. Ccunnsel Richard Bernard Assistant City Administrator City of &a:tdngton Beach "EE-5" AGENDA ITEM #34(b) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "EE-5" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS / \ ° OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 9272"127 108"ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-1018 (714)98 2411 FAX(714)982-0358 May 23, 1990 Mr. Joe J. Stucker Senior Vice President Land Development Signal Landmark 17890 Skypark Circle Irvine, CA 92714 Dear Mr. Stucker: Subject: Preannexation Agreement for Development of Signal Bolsa Chios Property By letter dated May 2, 1990, you were informed that County Sanitation District No. 11 (CSD 11) required execution of the preannexation agreement prior to May 16, or the Slater Avenue Sewer System Improvements would be designed and constructed without provision for the development of your Bolsa Chica property. As we have previously explained to you, CSD 11 can no longer wait to proceed with the design work or the necessary sewage system improvements. You have not responded to our letter. Accordingly, the purpose of this letter is to reiterate, so that there is no misunderstanding, your development will not receive sewer service from the existing or planned Slater Avenue Sewage System Improvements including the Slater Avenue Pump Station. Furthermore, •you should be aware that there is no guarantee of sewer service in the future. As you know, the District's ability to construct sewage collection, treatment and disposal facilities is dependent upon the receipt of permits from regulatory agencies. In the event *hat those approvals are not timely, CSD 11 may not allow annexation. Capacity will be allocated first I-n those who have previously annexed. "EE-6" AGENDA ITEM #34(b) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "EE-6" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS W ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFONNIA Mr. Joe J. Stucker May 23, 1990 'a6Y"S VENUE Page Two na.m.812s `r/ NwxraN va .0 IMANMS Meain nuuacz4ui Assuming CSD 11 can allow sewer service in the future, sewage facilities would have to be constructed to deliver the water to the Coast Trunk Sewer at Golden West Street and Orange Avenue. CSD 11 will not design, construct, maintain or pay for any of these facilities. Z rul urs,Z M. Dawes Director of Engineering TMD:jt CERTIFIED MAIL cc: General Counsel Richard Bernard Assistant City Administrator City of Huntington Beach Directors, CSD 11 General Manager "EE-7" AGENDA ITEM #34(b) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "EE-7" .� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 11 29 3 ,59 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON MAY 9, 1990 PNITAT9G^,O i aav°limn Oo S U G 'r/ees 195 .I RgNGE C& a ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and la of Orange County, California, was held an May 9, 1990, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Fall wing the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. I, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11. 13 and le as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: x James A. Weimer, Chairman Orma Crank -7--Charles E. Puckett, Chairman pro tem —_0.lchard B. Edgar =Dan Griset Dan Young =Roger Stanton —Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 2: x Iry Pickier, Chat rman Fred Hunter x James Neal, Chat roan pro tem —George Scott =Roland E. Bigonger —_Henry W. Nodes =A.B. -Buck' Catlin _Chris Marty =Dan Griset _Dan Young xWilliam 0. Mahoney _Beth Graham =Robert H. Main Norman Culver =Carrey Nelson —Mayne Wadin =Arthur G. Newton Norman Z. Eckenrode_ a Wayne Silzel Harold Saldarini =Don E. Smith —Fred Barrera =Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 3: x Richard Polls, Chat roan Eva G. Miner =J.R. -Bob- Siefen, Chairman pro tan —Dewey Wiles a Margaret M. Arnold —Cecilia L. Age x Wes Bannister —Peter Green _ =A.B. -Buck- Catlin _Chris Worthy x Norman Culver _Robert H. Main =Beth Graham William 0. Mahoney =Don R. Griffin —Gonna L. Chessen 7--Dan Griset —Dan Young =James Neal —George Scott =Carrey Nelson _Wayne Wedin =Iry Pickier Fred Hunter =Roger Stanton —_Don R. Roth =Charles Sylvia Robert wahlstrw =Paul Verellen —Edward L. Allen =Edna Nilson —Victor Orgies DISTRICT NO. 5: x Evelyn Hart. Chairman Ruthelyn Plummer =Phil Sansone, Chat rman pro tem John C. Cox, Jr. _Don R. Roth =Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 6: x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chat rman _Evelyn Hart =James Wenner, Chairman pro tem James M. Ferryman _Don R. Roth x Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 7: x Don E. Smith, Chat roan Fred Barrera x Richard Edgar, Chat roan pro tem —Charles E. Puckett �. =John C. Cox, Jr. —Ruthelyn Plummer =Dan Griset Dan Young Don R. Roth =_Roger Stanton =Sally Anne Sheridan tarry Agran x James Wahner _yarry Green DISTRICT NO. 11: x Grace Winchell, Chairman Peter Green —Tom Mays, Chairman pro tem =Jim Silva z Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 13: x Henry W. Mocha, Chat rnan _Roland E. Bigonger =Wayne Wedin. Chairman pro tan Carrey Nelson = _ _Iry Pickier Fred Hunter Don R. Roth x Roger Stanton =Dan E. Smith Fred Barrera DISTRICT NO. IJ: Peer A. Swan, Chairman x Darryl Miller =Sally Anne Sheridan. Chairman pro tn:. --Larry Agran _Leslie A. Pontious _Richard B. Edgar "Res" Don R. Roth x Roger Stanton =Don E. Smith —Fred Barrera -2- 05/09/90 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita J. Brown, Board Secretary, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Corinne Clawson, Mark Esquer, Penny Kyle, John Linder, Rory Nelson, Bob Ooten, Jack Vincent, Rich von Langen, Chuck Winsor OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel , Jamel Demir, Conrad Hohener, Walt Howard, Bill Knopf, Phil Stone, Jiimney Knight, David Wade, Ramiro Salazar, Jose A. Salazar, Don Willet, Victor M. Salazar, Ray Byerley, Tom Richardson, Steve Dworkin DISTRICTS 1, 2, 7 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file minute excer is from the arden rove Sanitary That the minute excerpts from the District and the City of Tustin re Garden Grove Sanitary District and the Board appointments City of Tustin re appointment of alternate Directors and seating new members of the Boards, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows: (*Mayor) Agency District Active Director Alternate Director Garden Grove 2 Robert H. Main Norman E. Culver Sanitary Dist. City of Tustin 1 Charles E. Puckett Richard B. Edgar* 7 Richard B. Edgar* Charles E. Puckett 14 Leslie A. Pontious Richard B. Edgar* DISTRICT 1 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and 'elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary , declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1. It was then moved: That Director James A. Wahner be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Wahner as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Charles E. Puckett be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Puckett as Chairman pro tem. -3- 05/09/90 DISTRICT 2 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and— elections are to be held for Chairman hairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tam of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2. It was then moved: That Director Iry Pickier be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Pickler as Chairman. It was further moved: That Directors Roland Bigonger and James Neal be nominated as candidates for the office of Chairman pro tem. The vote was then polled by a show of hands, following which the Secretary announced that Director Neal had been elected Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 3 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and— elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of.Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3. It was then moved: That Director Richard T. Polls be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was palled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Polls as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director J. R. "Bob" Siefen be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Siefen as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 5 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tern of e Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro ' tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. S. It was then moved: That Director Evelyn Hart be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Hart as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Phil Sansone be nominated as a candidate fog the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Sansone as Chairman pro tem. -4- 05/09/90 DISTRICT 6 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chal man 'and elections are to be held for Chairman Cha rman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6. It was then moved: That Director Ruthelyn Plummer be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Plummer as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director James A. Wahner be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Wahner as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 7 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman-and elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary - declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7. It was then moved: That Director Don E. Smith be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Smith as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Sally Anne Sheridan be nominated for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Sheridan as Chairman pro tem. After a caucus by the Board, Director Sheridan withdrew from the post of Chairman pro tem, following which Director Richard B. Edgar was duly nominated and elected Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 11 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of ChairmaT and elections are to be held for Chairman Chairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro - tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11. It was then moved: That Director Grace Winchell be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was pilled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Winchell as Chairman. it was further moved: That Director Tam Mays be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman prc tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was palled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director May: Chairman pro tem. -5- �.. 05/09/90 DISTRICT 13 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman hairman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13. It was then moved: That Director Henry W. Wedaa be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Wedaa as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Wayne Wedin be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Wedin as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 14 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman 5—airman pro tem of the Board and Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14.. It was then moved: That Director Peer A. Swan be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Swan as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Sally Anne Sheridan be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Sheridan as Chairman pro tem. ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Catlin reported that Adoption of Resolutions of Directors Ursula Kennedy and Bob Perry Appreciation for retiring hectors had announced their retirement from the Boards of Directors. Ursula Kennedy, serving on the District 14 Board, has represented the City of Tustin for approximately four years. Bob Perry has represented the Garden Grove Sanitary District for the last 16 years on the District No. 2 Board. The Joint Chairman then introduced resolutions expressing the Boards' appreciation to these retiring Directors. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt the following resolutions expressing their appreciation to the retiring Directors and recognizing their outstanding contributions and dedication to public service: Resolution No. Director City/Agency District 90-39 Ursula Kennedy Tustin 14 90-40 Bob Perry Garden Grove Sanitary Dist. 2 ../ Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. -6- 05/09/90 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Catlin reported that at Peco n t on of industrial its annual conference in April , the ischar ers--Omni Metal Finisning, California Water Pollution Control xson Meta ,n,shin and naheim Association had presented awards of Citrus roducts-- or receivin excellence and certificates to three / awards of excellence Orange County industrial firms. The purpose of the awards is to stimulate interest on the part of industry to take positive steps to meet strict water pollution control standards. These firms, nominated by the Districts' Industrial Waste Division inspectors, were recognized for their efforts over the past year to comply with Districts' discharge requirements and foster an awareness in the business community for the need to control industrial wastewater to help protect public health and the environment. The Joint Chairman then recognized Mr. Victor Salazar of Omni Metal Finishing as well as several other employees from the firm, recipient of a CWPCA Certificate of Merit; Mr. Jimmy Knight of Hixson Metal Finishing, recipient of a CWPCA Certificate of Merit; and Mr. David Wade, Plant Manager of Anaheim Citrus Products, recipient of CWPCA's Large Plant-of-the-Year award. Chairman Catlin presented each of the industry representatives the awards recognizing their exemplary performance. On behalf of the Boards of Directors, Chairman Catlin commended the firms and expressed the Boards' appreciation for their efforts. ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Catlin reported that Report of the Joint Chairman the Districts' General Manager, Wayne Sylvester, was recently elected Vice President of the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) at their annual meeting in Houston. AMSA is very active in legislative, regulatory and technical issues at the national level with offices in Washington, D.C. The Joint Chairman then noted that because of recent turnover in Board membership, there have been vacancies created on some of the Boards' Committees. Chairman Catlin announced the following appointments to various Committees: Director Committee Post Henry Wades Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee Chairman Wayne Wedin Fiscal Policy Committee Member Robert Main Special Reorganization Committee Representative, District 2 Phil Sansone Special Reorganization Committee Representative, District 5 Joint Chairman Catlin then reported that the Fiscal Policy Committee was scheduled to meet on Wednesday, May 16th, at 5:30 p.m. He also called a Joint meeting of the Executive Committee and the Fiscal Policy Committee for Wednesday, May 23rd, at 5:30 p.m.. Mr. Catlin further reported that a special Joint Works Selection Committee meeting had been scheduled for Wednesday, May 23rd, immediately following the Joint Executive Committee/Fiscal Policy Committee meeting. The .Joint Chairman also advised that the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse ^ Committee was scheduled to meet on Thursday, May 31st, at 5:30 p.m. -7- 05/09/90 ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel briefly reported Report of the General Counsel on the settlement of a claim filed several years ago by Cravens, Dargen a Company as a result of a sewer backup in District 7. He also reported on the status of pending litigation relative to Universal Circuits, Inc. (UCI) concerning the Districts' decision not to renew the industrial waste discharge permit for their facility on Newport Circle in Santa Ana. Mr. Woodruff advised that he had just received a proposal from Universal Circuit's attorney relative to resolution of the lawsuits filed by UCI and the Districts relative to the Newport Circle plant, as well as UCI's application for an industrial waste permit for their new facility currently being constructed on South Yale in Santa Ana which the Districts had recently denied. He noted that he had not yet had an opportunity to evaluate the proposal but would report further on the matter at the Executive Committee meeting scheduled for May 23rd. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 11, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 11, 1990, nor the adjourned regular meeting held April 18, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 11, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 11, 1990, nor the adjourned regular meeting held April 5, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 11, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or Approval of M mutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 11, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT it There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 11, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or Approva of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the �✓ regular meeting held April 11, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -8- 05/09/90 DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 11, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Uaimi That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 4/11/90 4/25/90 ALL DISTRICTS Joint operating Fund - $ 564,949.79 $ 946,387.45 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund 2,044,463.55 354,973.08 Joint Working Capital Fund - 212,846.74 186,375.58 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 13,922.72 11,743.17 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 338.00 135.72 DISTRICT - 8,090.58 12,771.73 DI TRRDUT NO. 3 - 18,459.41 3,384.51 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 5,808.77 7,539.74 DISTRICT NO. - 230.71 9,197.99 DI TRI T N . 7 - 16,126.40 82,380.68 DISTRICT - 4,319.12 6,749.59 OI TRI T N . 13 - 38.00 -0- DISTRICT NO. 14 - 5,406.93 28,456.16 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 24,599.59 3,058.81 DISTRICTS N & 7 J INT - 2,274.67 11,519.63 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 2 035.92 3,690.44 ,92 ,_;1_6 70 T1, 68794. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Video ns ection Services for Districts' ewers and Manholes That the bid tabulation and Specification No. -045, to PSS, Inc. recommendation re award of purchase order contract for Video Inspection Services for Districts' Sewers and Manholes, Specification No. S-045, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase order contract be, and is hereby, awarded to PSS, Inc. , in an amount not to exceed $164,786.00 for a two-year period beginning May 15, 1990. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving hange Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 2 to the plans ob�o.P1-33 and specifications for Primary Clariflers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33, authorizing an addition of $21,371.00 to the contract with Gust K. Newberg Construction Co. for three items of additional work, be, anu i hereby, approved. -9- 05/09/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: rov n an a Order No. 3 to the 0�ans and speclficationS for That change Order No. 3 to the plans 33- and specifications for Rehabilitation `./ of Digesters 7 and 8 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-1, authorizing an addition of $92,392.00 to the contract with S. A. Healy Co. 8 Assoc. for seven items of additional work, and granting a time extension of 60 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving d endum No. 2 to the rofess ona ervices reement That the Selection Committee w o e n neer n or orat on certification of the final negotiated or design of Job No. -17 fee relative to Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17, providing for wage escalations and construction ` management/inspection services, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-41, approving said Addendum No. 2 to the Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation, for additional services on an hourlyy-rate basis for labor plus overhead, for an additional amount not to exceed $6,438.00 for wage escalations due to delays in the project, plus construction management/ Inspection services at the rate of $80.00 per hour, including overhead and profit, for a total amount not to exceed $156,160.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $329,105.00 to an amount not to exceed $491,703.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin Addendum o. b e ro ess 0nal ervices A reement That the Boards of Directors hereby with K. P. Lindstrom nc. for adopt Resolution No. 90-42, approving technical and environmental support Addendum No. 1 to the Professional services re 1 ollection services Agreement with K. P. Lindstrom, Treatment and u1sposa aciiities Inc. for technical and environmental Master Plan FIR and Ucean Discharge support services relative to the 1989 emn t renewal app ca on Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan Environmental Impact Report and Ocean Discharge Permit renewal application, providing for a reallocation of the costs among categories within said agreement, with no change in the maximum authorized compensation of $304,000.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Aut or n the GeneralManager to Ts sue azi urc ase order to Southern That the General Manager be, and is a ornia son am an re hereby, authorized to issue a purchase installation o a e un er roun order to Southern California Edison facilities to provide for a Company in the amount of $69,499.00 4,U 0 kw, standbyelectrical power and execute necessary documents, in service for .ant No. 1 form approved by the General Counsel , for Installation of added underground facilities to provide for a 4,000 kw, standby electrical power service for Plant No. 1. -10- 05/09/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizin staff to ssue a urchase order to olar urb;nes That staff be, and is hereby, Inc. pec fication No. R- authorized to issue a purchase order to Solar Turbines, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $45,000.00 plus sales tax for Repairs to Solar Energy Generator No. 3 at Plant No. 1 (Specification No. R-036). ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amending Boards' action of Apr'1 11, 1990 revokin au 55F zatit� That the Boards' action of April 11, Issue a urchase order to M chael 1990, be, and is hereby, amended, hevrolet and , or z ng staff to revoking authorization for staff to Issue a urchase order to Folsom Lake issue a purchase order to Michael Ford pecification No. -35 - Chevrolet in the amount of $86,535.00 plus tax for the purchase of nine Chevrolet S10 pick-up trucks (Specification No. A-150-2); and authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Folsom Lake Ford in the amount of $84,331.89 plus tax and delivery charges for purchase of nine Ford Ranger pick-up trucks (Specification No. A-150-2) , in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Cooperative Procurement Program of the State of California and State of California Contract No. 1-90-23-20. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Den in Application for Permission to resent Lae aim of Lynn Redman That the Application for Permission to Present Late Claim for personal injuries filed by Leatrice L. Cohen, attorney for claimant Lynn Redman, be, and is hereby, denied. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive file and a rove written report of the Executive omni ttee That the written report of the Executive Committee's meeting on April 25, 1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Establishing policies and procedures for selection and procurement of That the Boards of Directors hereby professional engineering, adopt Resolution No. 90-43, architectural , environmental , land establishing policies and procedures surveying and construction for the selection and procurement of management services professional engineering, architectural , environmental , land surveying and construction management services. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizin staff to ssue a urchase order to F. E. arleton That staff be, and is hereby, for rofessiona consul tin services authorized to issue a purchase order re obtainingAQMD ermits m^ to F. E. Carleton in an amount not to other SCAQMD issues exceed $50,000.00 for professional consulting services, on an as-needed uasis, at the rate of $95.00 per hour, for a two-year period beginning May 10, 1990, to assist the Districts in obtaining permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) for current and future projects at both treatment plants, and for assistance relative to other SCAQMD issues. -11- 05/09/90 DISTRICTS 1,2 3 5,, 11 a 13 Staff report re Long-range Financ a Plan Ddate an -91 Sewer connection ee and use Fee Recommendations Verbal staff report The General Manager reported that in July 1989, as part of the Districts' u2020 VISION' 30-year Wastewater Management Action Plan, the Boards approved a Financial Plan prepared by the Action Plan consulting team. Basically, the Financial Plan provides for financing sewerage facilities expansion (capacity increases) by sewer connection fees paid by new development; facilities rehabilitation and improved treatment by borrowing capital funds in the securities market (certificates of participation); and operations, maintenance and new debt service by a combination of property taxes and user fees. At the April Board Meeting, when ordinances to fix the sewer connection fees and use fees for 1990-91 were introduced for first reading, some Directors requested that additional information on the long-range plan be provided to the Boards. When the Boards originally reviewed the various elements of the Master Plan the primary document utilized was the 02020 VISION° Preliminary Report and Executive Summary. Therefore, prior to this meeting a full copy of the adopted Financial Plan, which is Volume 8 of the approved Master Plan, was mailed for the Directors' review. It describes the Financial Plan in considerable detail and also provides a summary in Chapter 1. Each year, as part of the budget process, staff updates the fiscal projections and recommends connection and user fee rates required to finance Districts' activities for the ensuing year. Also enclosed with the mailing was a separate staff report reflecting the updated estimates for those Districts now considering their 1990-91 rates. At this point the original Master Plan projections are pretty much on target and, in fact, in most instances, the fee projections are actually lower than estimated in the Master Plan. However, Districts' activities are dictated by regulatory authorities whose actions can cause major changes in the requirements and the cost of the Districts' wastewater management program. Wastewater management costs will continue to escalate for four basic reasons: (1) Stricter environmental standards and regulations; (2) The federal and state governments no longer fund 871i percent of facilities for improved ' treatment; (3) Normal inflationary trends; and, (4) Rising flows. The Director of Finance then reported that for many years the Districts, as part of the annual budgetary process, have forecast revenues and expenditures on a five-year basis and since 1986-87 have used a ten-year horizon. The purpose of this long-range financial planning is to assure that adequate funding is available to carry out the Districts' wastewater management program for the protection of public health and the environment, and the benefit of the communities and the two million citizens which the Districts serve in metropolitan Orange County. A major benefit of the long-range cash flow projections is that they enable a determination well in advance of when revenue shortfalls will begin to occur so that the Boards of Directors will have adequate time to consider alternative funding measures and take the necessary actions to ensure each District's financial integrity. -12- 05/09/90 For some time projections have indicated that funding shortfalls would occur throughout the Districts during the latter part of the 1980'5 and early 1990's, and that each District would have to consider additional revenue sources to meet long-term funding requirements for sewerage facilities improvements and expansion and ongoing operations and maintenance costs. Property taxes, connection fees and federal and state construction grants have historically been the major source of local financing of District's activities. However, since Proposition 13 all ad valorem property tax revenue has been used in the Operating Funds for maintenance, operations and rehabilitation and none has been available for capital improvements. The costs of providing service continue to rise beyond the ability of the property tax apportionments and the past connection fee schedules to keep pace with the stringent requirements of the federal , state and regional regulatory agencies for advanced wastewater treatment and air emissions control , and the need to provide additional facilities to meet the Increasing demands on the sewerage system. The Director of Finance further reported that the capital facilities charge (connection fee) is a one-time fee collected at the time a building permit is issued and provides for capacity for new . development. The Districts' 30-year Master Plan adopted in 1989 proposed that this fee be reviewed and adjusted annually. The recommended adjustment is for an increase of $10 per unit effective with the 1990-91 fiscal year. The connection fees are identical in each District to accommodate the collection by the cities on behalf of the various Districts. Mr. Streed then briefly reviewed the proposed increases in the sanitary sewer service charges (user fees) of Districts 1, 3, 5, 6, it and 13, commenting on the cash flow schedules upon which the staff's recommendations for adjustments effective with the 1990-91 fiscal year were based. He noted that District No. 2 just recently enacted an ordinance adopting sanitary sewer service charges and, therefor, does not need to. make any adjustments at this time. District No. 7 has not yet adopted sewer service charges, and the Irvine Ranch Water District collects and pays user fees to District No. 14 in lieu of District 14 adopting separate sewer service charges. He noted that in addition to the aforementioned fees, industrial firms pay a separate user fee based bn their actual demand on the sewerage system as determined by the provisions of the Districts' uniform industrial waste ordinance. The Director of Finance also reported that in accordance with the recommendations contained in the Financial Plan included as part of the 30-year Master Plan, all Districts, except District 14 and possibly District 13, will need to issue some form of debt over the next 10 years to meet approximately one-half of the capital needs. The Issuance of debt also allows a more gradual and stabilized annual adjustment of user fees to meet fiscal obligations than would otherwise be required on a cash pay-as-you-go basis. -13- �,r/ 05/09/90 Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Staff Report dated April 25, 1990 re Long-range Financial Plan Update and 1990-91 Sewer Connection and Use Fee Recommendations, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,11 8 13 Public hearing and adoption of ordinances increasing capital facilities connection charges Public Hearing The Joint Chairman announced that this was the time and place fixed by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 for a public hearing on the following proposed Ordinances, Amending Ordinances Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities: Amending Repealing District Ordinance No. Ordinance No. Ordinance No. 1 115 113 114 2 211 208 209 3 313 311 312 5 522 520 521 6 616 614 615 7 724 722 723 11 1112 1110 1111 13 1307 1305 1306 Open Public Hearing The Chairman declared the hearing open at 8:20 p.m. Verbal report of General Counsel The Districts' General Counsel reported that the proposed ordinances, making adjustments in the capital facilities connection charges for each of the eight Districts, were introduced for first reading at the April Board meeting. He stated that no changes had been made to the ordinances since that meeting. If adopted, the ordinances will take effect July 11, 1990. Close hearing The Chairman declared the hearing closed at 8:21 p.m. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 115 That proposed Ordinance No. 115, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 113 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 114, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its `...✓ entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 115 by title only. -14- 05/09/90 DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried Adopting Ordinance No. 115 by the following roll call vote: AYES: James A. Wahner, Chairman, Dan Griset, Charles E. Puckett, Roger R. Stanton NOES: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 115, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 113 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 114, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 211 That proposed Ordinance No. 211, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 208 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 209, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 211 by title only. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried Adopting Ordinance No. 211 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Iry Pickler, Chairman, Roland E. Bigonger, A. B. "Buck" Catlin, Dan Griset, William D. Mahoney, Robert H. Main, James Neal , Carrey J. Nelson, Arthur G. Newton, Don E. Smith, Roger R. Stanton NOES: None ABSENT: Wayne Silzel That Ordinance No. 211, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 208 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 209, be, , and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 313 That proposed Ordinance No. 313, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 311 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 312, be read by title only; and, -� FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 313 by title only. -15- 05/09/90 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried Adopting Ordinance Wo. 313 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Richard T. Polis, Chairman, Wes Bannister, A. B. "Buck" Catlin, Norman E. Culver, Beth Graham, Don R. Griffin, Dan Griset, James Neal , Carrey J. Nelson, Iry Pickler, J. R. "Bob" Siefen, Roger R. Stanton, Charles E. Sylvia, Paul Verellen, Edna Wilson NOES: None ABSENT: Margaret M. Arnold That Ordinance No. 313, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 311 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 312, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 522 That proposed Ordinance No. 522, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 520 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 521, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 522 by title only. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried Adopting Ordinance No. 522 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Evelyn Hart, Chairman, Phil Sansone, Roger R. Stanton NOES: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 522, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 520 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 521, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 616 That proposed Ordinance No. 616, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 614 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 615, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 616 by title only. -16- 05/09/90 DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried Adopting Ordinance No. 616 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman, Roger R. Stanton, James A. Wahner NOES: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 616, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 614 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 615, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 724 That proposed Ordinance No. 724, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 722 Establishing Wastewater - Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 723, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 724 by title only. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried Adopting Ordinance No. 724 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Don E. Smith, Chairman, John C. Cox, Jr., Richard B. Edgar, Dan Griset, Sally Anne Sheridan, Roger R. Stanton, James A. Wahner NOES: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 724, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 722 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 723, be,and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: econd Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 1112 That proposed Ordinance No. 1112, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1110 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1111, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 1112 by title only. -17- 05/09/90 DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried Adopting Ordinance No. 1112 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Grace H. Winchell , Chairman, Tom Mays, Roger R. Stanton NOES: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 1112, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1110 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1111, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: econd Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 1307 That proposed Ordinance No. 1307, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1305 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1306, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 1307 by title only. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried Adopting Ordinance No. 1307 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Henry W. Wedaa, Chairman, Iry Pickler, Don E. Smith, Roger R. Stanton, Wayne D. Wedin NOES: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 1307, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1305 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1306, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICTS 1,3,5,6,1I & 13 Public hearing and adoption of ordinances increasing sanitary sewer service charges Public Hearing The Joint Chairman announced that this was the time and place fixed by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 3, 5, 6, it and 13 for a public hearing on the following proposed Ordinances, Amending Ordinances Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: �.✓ -18- 05/09/90 Amending Repealing District Ordinance No. Ordinance No. Ordinance No. 1 116 109 112 3 314 309 N/A 5 523 516 519 6 617 609 fill 8 613 11 1113 1108 1109 13 1308 1303 N/A Open Public Hearing The Chairman declared the hearing open at 8:24 p.m. Verbal report of General Counsel The Districts' General Counsel reported that the proposed ordinances, providing for adjustments to the sanitary sewer service charges, were introduced for first reading at the April Board meeting. He stated that no changes had been made. If - adopted, the ordinances will take effect July 1, 1990. Close hearing The Chairman declared the hearing closed at 8:25 p.m. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 115 That proposed Ordinance No. 116, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 109 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 112, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 116 by title only. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried Adopting Ordinance No. 116 by the following roll call vote: AYES: James A. Wahner, Chairman, Dan Griset, Charles E. Puckett, Roger R. Stanton NOES: None .ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 116, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 109 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 112, be, and is hereby, adopted. -19- 05/09/90 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Read n of Pro osed r finance No. 14 That proposed Ordinance No. 314, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 309 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 314 by title only. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried Adopting Ordinance No. 714 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Richard T. Polls. Chairman, Wes Bannister, A. B. "Buck" Catlin, Norman E. Culver, Beth Graham, Don R. Griffin, Dan Griset, James Neal , Carrey J. Nelson, Iry Pickler, J. R. "Bob" Siefen, Roger R. Stanton, Charles E. Sylvia, Paul Verellen, Edna Wilson NOES: None ABSENT: Margaret M. Arnold That Ordinance No. 314, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 309 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be, and Is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: econd Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 523 That proposed Ordinance No. 523, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 519, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 523 by title only. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried Adopting Ordinance No. 523 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Evelyn Hart, Chairman, Phil Sansone, Roger R. Stanton NOES: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 523, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending `.� Ordinance No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 519, be, and is hereby, adopted. -20- 05/09/90 DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Reading of Proposed rdinance NO. 617 That proposed Ordinance No. 617, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, �✓ California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance Nos. fill and 613, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 617 by title only. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried Adopting Ordinance No. 617 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman, Roger R. Stanton, James A. Wahner NOES: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 617, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 611 and 613, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 11IJ That proposed Ordinance No. 1113, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1108 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1109, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 1113 by title only. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried Adopting Ordinance No. 1113 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Grace H. Winchell , Chairman, Tom Mays, Roger R. Stanton NOES: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 1113, An Ordinance of theBoard of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1108 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1109, be, and is hereby, adopted. _21_ 05/09/90 DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second Reading of Propose Ordinance No. 13 That proposed Ordinance No. 1308, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1303 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Secretary read Ordinance No. 1308 by title only. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried Adopting Ordinance No. OUT by the following roll call vote: AYES: Henry W. Wedaa, Chairman, Iry Pickler, Don E. Smith, Roger R. Stanton, Wayne D. Wedin NOES: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 1308, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1303 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICTS 1 3 5,6 11 & 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Directing the ounty Auditor- Controller to include sewer service That the Boards of Directors hereby charges on property tax bills adapt the following resolutions commencing with 1990- 1 fiscal year directing the County Auditor-Controller to include sewer service charges on the property tax bills, pursuant to Ordinances of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 3, 5, 6, 11 and 13 of Orange County, commencing with the 1990-91 fiscal year: District Resolution No. Ordinance No. 1 90-44-1 116 3 90-45-3 314 5 90-46-5 523 6 90-47-6 617 11 90-48-11 1113 13 90-49-13 1308 Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m. , May 9, 1990. -22- 05/09/90 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: rovin an a Order No. 6 to the ans and s ecifications Tor That Change Order No. 6 to the plans Contract NOS. Z-4b-Z and - 7 and specifications for Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and Lampson Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2, and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27, authorizing an addition of $77,778.00 to the contract with W. H. Ebert Corp. for six items of additional work and granting a time extension of 14 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the General Manager to _ issue a urchase order to outhern That the General Manager be, and is al ifornia Gas Company for relocation hereby, authorized to issue a purchase Gof asa n m in order to construct order to Southern California Gas ontract No. Company in an amount not to exceed $7D,000.00 and to execute necessary documents, in form approved by the General Counsel , for relocation of approximately 1,400 feet of 4-inch diameter gas main required in connection with construction of the Katella Relief Sewer, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract No. 2-28. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m. , May 9, 1990. DISTRICTS 5 8 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change rder No. 1 to the Tans and s ecifications for That Change Order No. I to the plans Contract Nos. 5- 7-1 and 5- 7-2 and specifications for Rehabilitation of Balboa Trunk Sewer, Between 32nd Street and Coronado Street, Contract No. 5-27-1, and Investigation of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 5-37-2, authorizing an addition of $1,305.00 to the contract with National Plant Services, Inc. for additional video inspection services, and granting a time extension of 60 calendar days for delay in starting the project to allow the contractor to complete emergency repair work to sewers in San Francisco damaged by the October 1990 earthquake, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICTS 5 8 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Contract Nos. 5-27-1 and 5-37-2 as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-50, accepting Rehabilitation of Balboa Trunk Sewer, Between 32nd Street and Coronado Street, Contract No. 5-27-1, and Investigation of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 5-37-2, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of ^ Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m. , May 9, 1990. -23- 05/09/90 DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the. meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m. , May 9, 1990. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 1 arrett Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 90-51-7, ordering annexation of 2.47 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Amapola Avenue and Orange Park Boulevard in unincorporated County territory (Annexation No. 129 - Garrett Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: ovi eimbure nt Agreement witheorgdamm .e That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 90-52-7, approving Reimbursement Agreement with George Adams, Jr. , providing for reimbursement to Mr. Adams by the District of a .proportional share of his cost of constructing a sewer line in Baja Panorama Street, to be collected from the owners of Lots 7 and 9 of Tract No. 939 upon connection to the sewer. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m. , May 9, 1990. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m. , May 9, 1990. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:30 p.m. , May 9, 1990. "Now -24- 05/09/90 DISTRICTS 3 & 11 Actions re financin desi n, constrnc ion, Cdpdc7ty 0W arship ana o eration of certain master- loaned sewa a collection facilit es for serving is ricts i and ii; and tne Balsa Chico area presently outside the Districts' boundaries Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering reported that studies have been completed over the past several years which analyzed and prioritized the needed sewage facilities for serving certain areas within District 3 and District 11, and the area generally described as Bolsa Chica which is presently outside the Districts' boundaries, concluding that the long-planned extension of the Coast Trunk Sewer should be replaced with the reconstruction of the Slater Avenue Pump Station by both Districts 3 and 11, and recommending that construction costs be shared in accordance with sewage flows generated from each District. This change is projected to save District 3 $600,000 and District 11 $4,700,000. Said studies include a 1988 report prepared by Willdan Associates which dealt with the possible exchange of drainage areas between Districts 3 and 11; the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan (30-year Wastewater Management Action Plan, 112020 VISION,,); and a recently-completed Project Report on the Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17. The Director of Engineering reviewed various elements of the reports, noting that the most urgent improvements needed are the reconstruction of the Slater Avenue Pump Station including the influent and discharge facilities for the pump station. These facilities will cost approximately $7,600,000. The second priority is replacement of the Goldenwest Trunk Sewer, between Heil Avenue and Slater Avenue, at a cost of $4,300,000. He also noted that additional facilities required include the parallel Slater Avenue Trunk, the Heil Avenue Interceptor, improvements to facilities in Warner Avenue west of Springdale Street, and new lines in Springdale and Goldenwest Streets north of McFadden Avenue and Edinger Avenue, respectively. Mr. Dawes advised that the proposed capacity exchanges in certain existing and proposed sewage facilities would result in a net equity purchase from District 11 by District 3 in the amount of $630,836.00. He added that the proposed agreement between Districts 3 and 11 would provide for payment by District 3 in the amount of $1,050,000 and District it in the amount of $16,950,000 for the total cost of facilities described above, including the joint $7,600,000 reconstruction of the Slater Avenue Pump Station, influent sewers and discharge facilities. The necessary capital for these facilities could be provided by fees from the development of Balsa Chica and other vacant areas within the northwesterly portion of District 11 if collected on a timely basis. ^ For District 3, the development of Holly-Seacliff properties would more than offset the funding necessary for their prorated share of the Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements. -25- 05/09/90 With regard to development of the Bolsa Chica area, staff reported that in April 1987 the Directors of District 11 authorized staff and General Counsel to negotiate with owners of approximately 1,608 acres in the Bolsa Chica area. The Signal Bolsa Corporation is the principal `..►� landowner. The Bolsa Chica area is presently outside the boundary of District 11 but within its sphere of influence. Signal Bolsa principals and counsel and Districts' staff and counsel have met numerous times over the past several years in an attempt to come to a pre-annexation agreement. However, Signal Balsa Corporation is not yet ready to annex and recently advised staff that they are no longer willing to proceed with the proposed pre-annexation agreement. The last draft of the proposed agreement provided for the annexation of the Bolsa Chica area and pre-payment of fees for those areas to be developed by Signal Bolsa to provide the necessary funding for construction of capacity In the Slater Pump Station system to serve the Bolsa Chica if and when it is annexed. Staff emphasized that it is necessary to proceed with design and construction of the Slater Pump Station system and the Districts cannot delay the project any longer waiting for Signal Bolsa Corporation to make up its mind on the issue of a pre-annexation agreement. The Director of Engineering pointed out that if capacity for the Bolsa Chica is not included in the Slater Pump Station system, Signal Bolsa would have to construct its own sewer lines through the Bolsa Chica area and tie into the Districts' Coast Trunk Sewer at a cost that would be substantially higher than putting up the money. now for capacity in the Slater Pump Station system. Funding and construction of the facilities to connect to the Districts' Coast Trunk Sewer would have to be provided by the property owners/developers. Staff and Directors then entered into a lengthy discussion relative to whether or not the Slater Avenue Pump Station should be sized to provide for capacity for the Bolsa Chica area. In response to a request for clarification on the issue of whether or not to include capacity for Bolsa Chica in the Slater Avenue Pump Station system, the staff and General Counsel pointed out that if such capacity was Included without the benefit of a pre-annexation agreement with the property owners to provide the necessary funding, in effect the rate-payers in Districts 3 and 11 would have to front the costs without any assurance that they would be recovered in the future. Staff further advised that because of the urgent need to proceed with design and construction of the facilities they had notified Signal Bolsa Corporation that they must make a decision by May 15, 1990 on the pre-annexation agreement, and that without such an agreement the Districts could provide no assurance that the area could be annexed or provided sewerage service by the Districts in the future. It was also pointed out that officials representing the City of Huntington Beach, In whose sphere of influence Bolsa Chica also lies, have been kept apprised of the matter. Fallowing further discussion it was the consensus of the Directors that unless a pre-annexation agreement is executed by the Bolsa Chica property owners, capacity to serve the area should not be included in the -Districts' sewage system. -26 05/09/90 Staff noted that the Directors were not being asked that evening to make a decision on the capacity issue. Final design and sizing of the _ Slater Avenue Pump Station system will be presented to the Board for consideration at a future date. Receive, file and approve Staff Moved, seconded and duly carried: Report That the Staff Report dated May 1, 1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. Receive file, a rove and adopt Moved, seconded and duly carried: the ro ec Report re on rac No. 11-17 prepared by John aro a That the Project Report relative Engineers to Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17, dated April 3, 1990, prepared by John Carollo Engineers, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed, approved and adopted. A rovin A reement between Moved, seconded and duly carried: is r c 5 in tl 11 re financing, desi n construction ca acit That the Boards of Directors owners an 05 era an o cer a n hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-53, sewage collection facilities approving Agreement between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 3 and 11 providing for financing, design, construction, capacity ownership and operation of certain master-planned sewage collection facilities for serving Districts 3 and 11. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Authorizing staff and General Moved, seconded and duly carried: ounse o ne ofEle ate with eneral elephone and c ron cs to That staff and General Counsel secure a site ce ad'an to ex st n be, and are hereby, authorized to Slater venue Pump um tation for negotiate with General Telephone construction of new pump station and Electronics (GTE) to secure a site adjacent to the existing Slater Avenue Pump Station for construction of the new pump station, providing for the exchange of the existing, smaller site for the new site, upon abandonment of the existing pump station; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute the necessary documents to effect such exchange, in form approved by the General Counsel ; and, FURTHER MOVED: That payment to GTE in an amount not to exceed $25,000.00 for said exchange, be, and is hereby, authorized. 27- 05/09/90 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:57 p.m., May 9, 1990. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:57 p.m., May 9, 1990. 3ecre ary oP the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 u -28- fuNC Nn 9159 - jr FIST WORK INO CAr ITAL PPOCESSIN6 DATE 1/01/9C PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER Ar13 •rya1..T .F.e GATT 1-LOON/• _ _.--__�____.__ r CLAIMS PAID 01/21/90v POSTING iNG GATT PO/1]/90 �eovAu. u ue unnv me rovn nu 1D5996 ARS KENT. INC. $167.53 INSTRUMENT PARTS .U-- INS+vnuv 105998 AIR 14DUSTRIES CORP. i172.9P REFUND USER FEN OVERPAYMENT 105999 AIR PRODUCTS i CHEMICAL INC. $940.36 PACKING MATERIALS _ I... _ M ryAyDrP r _ ee�gl .onrF 136[DI SAFETY SUPPLY AMERICA S2.601.19 INSTRUMENT/SAFETY SUPPLIES 106202 ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO. S59.2M REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 5-58___..__ oe ym 21 106001 ALVARADO MILLS. INC. $139.22 REFUND USER PER OVERPAYMENT 106005 AMER. INS?. L.A. TECH. CENTEP S995.GU TRAINING CLASS REGISTRATION S— vm — w wvvAYMOUPE 1066A7 ROP.CO INC. S/OR AMERICAN SEALS $5.474.77 SEALS/CASKETS v __.. 17 106000 AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY $329.3P FILM .A.7__. ^'^ IRER FEL nvvvveT__ 106010 ANAHEIM MEDICAL SQUARE iB9.Bl REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT ti 106011 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION i27.631.75 SEWER REPAIRS nN 106013 ULAKE P. ANDERSON 1675.11 T !¢EYING EXPENSE ' fTi I06P11 141MINY-S MECH. i MACHINE. INC 52.62B.2R MECHANICAL PARTS X135 mm Paaa.yL.._._.._ TEMYDBARIL$¢BIIICEE__ __._ _ 106016 AQUATIC BIOASSAY 6 CONSULTING 92 A10.00 OCEAN SAIELE 1 172 106017 ANATEX SERVICES, INC. 63,511.70 UNIFORM SERVICE 3' ruRmR— Pxv 106019 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT 6844.06 INSTRUMENT REPAIR ]> 1D6 A29 ART WORKS $511.27 FRAMING SERVICES 1010 AVOIDAO _ _NET)& meovP ___ 106022 BFM ENERGY PPODUC TS CORP. i1.302.6C REFUND USER FR¢ OVEPPAYlEXT 10E023 BFM TRANSPORT DYNAMICS CORP. $678:52 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT v 106125 BALLY RETAIL. INC. $150.00 BACKUP CLAIM 106C26 BANCROFT-UHIINEY CO. $433.65 PUBLICATION .nRPPT v.u. HAD..', Aun . enr. _ ca av+.n. ___ rnuamvnrmmv a rvg_p1:.3A 1A2._P2e]L_._.._— 106026 BARTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $1.246.71 LAB SUPPLIES 106029 BLASIUS ELECTRIC TRUCK. INC. $87.71 ELECTRIC CART PARTS _ fanre oevma __ _ 106P31 BORLAND INTERNATIONAL 957.62 PUBLICATIONS ITEM BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP $904.03 ENGINEERING SERVICRS _ .1 106034 ARGUN i CALDWELL CONSULTING $298,715.21 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19 u 706035 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $1,716.34 MOTOR �. .PI.S. near .._ cram. yS+n_aA PETI4_Ceeu vvxw 106037 [ A D GREASE COMPANY $1.108.17 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 106D36 CAT 6164.1. REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT xPArW NPIIR FNTF PF a1SF511 106040 CAL-CNEM SALES $36.76 HARDWARE 106041 CAL SOUTH EOUIPMENT CO. S502.60 INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION FUND NO 939- - JT GIST VOPPINA CtP17AL PROCESSING DATE 4/0t/9l PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AF43 CLAIMS PAID 09/11/MD POSTING DATE L9/11/9u + u.eP.u• ..n_ ur unnP IIE142 CALTROL • INC, 3714.23 ELECTRIC SUPPLIM __ N• •36•-1:--_._.___.. BLI-PAITS- 2060AA CALIF. ENERGY COMM. PUG. MS-13 612.63 REFUND USER 106095 CASA 4RANDE CONVALESCENT .- 6612.61 REFUND ➢SER F8¢ OV¢RPADHLN'2 •nc nec r SAFETY 6- ------- ---- 6067 CITY. FOR ADVANCED PROF. GFV. i1.390.ef REGISTRLATION 10604E CENTURY INST. f SUfI . $362.6- $APETV SUPPLIES • I6959 CHRenrur. CORP. 37-1 106051 CHURCH VE CORP. f$1.572.51 ENGIN ERING SERVICES 106051 CHURCH ENGINEERING. INC. S1•ST2.51 6NGINERRINC SBIPICRS ]-Il — lo& 106053 CONNEESS OF COMPONENTS OF CALIF f21.$16.41 PIRG PARTS IRIIgA [O NN ELL G.M. PARTS / DIV. 316.N TRUCK PARTS • - 10605E CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO $5.912.8.N3 CILUPINB M.O.10-11-87 106057 CONTINENTAL. GRAPHICS fA•Iq 0.T5 RLUEPBINTINC 9 AS--__-- ELECTRIC SUPPLIES ---- 106P BOSS cnN. INC. $953.R3 ENGINE REPAIRS '-' fTl ]REPELGD I COOPER NDUSTR lES• INC. t1.I15 d]9.E5 ENGINES M.0.3-13-87,6-11-88, J-19A ---------------- " = 206062 CRAZY SHIRTS. INCAPNELL 3367.91 RIOTING U ERRVICCS 106063 CRp2T SHIRTS. H fA 652.0E REYUNO USER FEE OVeRPAYMENT •5--- —RENTAL-GLBANNEFJ-7-4--_- — "=--I 136066 CAL WATER CUR ••3136.75 SLUDGE EqUIPMENT F.n 1II6066 LpPPY CUP TI TRUER t EQUIPMENT 322.Og0.GT SLUICE REMOVAL M.O.A-Il-88 •.cna• —y2iS.t:.--_. -88MIMA8-RLCILTRATION--._ ____..---.-._-__ .N 10606E EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT DEFT f5 d68.19 SEATS UNSU FEE INSURANCE I106D69...7. CA U.EMPLOYMENT DEVELOP MEMT $ 4A.39 REFUND 088E PLC 09¢XPAYN811T 1G6e71 DAT APPO RESEARCH CORP. •4,573.61 PULLICATION 1060 T2 BE AN2A CDRPOP FTION tq.571.61 BBPUND USER FEE OVBRPAYMBNT '--__ -l.Ir7• c.TAx nrvre Reu _____ uca.u.. ELOCNUI&5BRTSC86 206075 OICNSONS $133.997.72 PRINTING PARTS 106075 - DIFI01-ILI-PO ASSOCIATES $1.99T.T2 PRINTING „- •nana _.DOkADDLENTERPRISES. INC..�--___—_--SSA5.64 --- PLANT MAINTENANCE-- .._-_____._. _ .. 106C77 DUTADO BROS. IN . $25•T21.6q PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 TSPAI118 1 TRO TB TUNE EL GPAS. MACH MOVING 5900.00 ENGINE UNLOADING COSTS 106'J24__—EASTMANSALES--___ _35R2.7 .----.OFFICE SUP.RARTS--__.__—___.—._ 166081 EAS THAN• INC. $2.766.35 OFFICE SUPPLIES a 1G6081 EL TOPITO 11I R f7B6.35 REFUND U38R FEE OVERPAYMCNR •nanRP JEFFRESbEA p Rrcm err .A550G- 171.56 206004 JEFF ITIER f1T1.36 HAREAGE DWARE 106PLtl FACILITIES SUPPORT CO. 3121.0E LAPTYARE •1.. _ _ J-20.____-_ 06086 FEDERAL E7PRE$S CORP. S57." AIR NEICR1 106087 IERRELLGAS S45.46 PROPANE FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1/0A/94 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 —_-GCCLAIMS1 PAID U41111STA1LOS-0NG BATEE-000NW CLAIMS PAID UA/11/90 POSTING GATE CR/I I/90 _y3eo.uT V6 VF NOOR ^`SCAtAii AN __.___ 1060E8 FICO°S APPLIANCE SERVICC S70.13 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 106090 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $508.97 FILTERS 106011 FISCHER 1 PORTER CO. S1.390.03 CHLORINATION PARTS ^ 2 UC',""Ci --. ,..2.••• RE LAB-8UPP6LE6 -_.—.- 106C93 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA 503.30 FILM -_ 106094 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $6,125.94 WATER USEADE 136096 GAS RESTAURANT SVCS $6,737.86 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 106097 GARDEN GROVE PROF. BLDG. $196.66 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT _ �LL .... .300 9, F•ERRGLASG ----- 106099 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,693.61 TELEPHONE SERVICES - 106161 GEORGE LEECH a ASSOCIATES S1B8.81 SNITCH 589 0• •RCTAUMRRI'�ABT _____.._.__.__.___ 106102 61ERLICH-MITCMELL. INC. $18.456.34 MECHANICAL PUTS 106103 GIAPHIC CONTROLS $509.15 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES _ .3r 920 00 e11fLN86RLMG-SBRVa666a66-SB-T2- 106105 HACH COMPANY $34.19 LAB SUPPLIES _ M 176106 MARCO CORPORATION 36.373.29 KPICNANICAL PARTS $27S 00 METIN.RART -_.__. .... W= 106108 HMICHAELEWLETT HEIN2 S271.B8 METING 6 ONAIMIMG EXPENSE 106309 NEVI C76 PACRARO COMPANY a30B.07 COMPRESSOR No' -- 1 677 77 BATTERIES PARTS ---�� 1 1361I1 MOUSE Oi BATTERIESIS- 1560.89 HARDWARES n 106112 P.S. NV 6PE3 CO.. INC. S1.724.82 HARDWARE T19611] `•ON-QEACN-- -._.-_ __ i$70.82 1 EFI ND USER W 106115 MUNTING70H PEACH CO. 170.82 RUBBED USER S¢¢ OVERPAYMENT 1061115 HUNTING TOM BEACH RUBBER STAMP 1198.59 RUBBER STAMPS _ ♦s_ -.__.__ 1091 3061 IMPERIAL SR L VEST CHEMICAL 981 .73 BONNIE CHLORIDE H.O.11-08-89 306116 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PPBURETS $689.11 CONNECTORS _ 106120 INLAND ^•PER ---- ---S1.825 91 EQUIPMENT RENTAL --Al 106120 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. f1.$20.53 EQUIPMENT GENIAL 1..... [RVTNE RANCH WATER DISTRICT f20.3] RATES US6AC8 —116123 JENSEN I TOOESY ALLOYS VACUUM BAG�UBFLF35 1-622] JENSEN TOOLS S ALLOYS $466.91 OFFICE BAGS 13612A JOY CE OFFICE PRODUCTS La06.9. OFFICE SUPPLIES - -1 • LIES __ _......_.. Y1L.85 UPFIC6SURBLI85 10612E KAMER BEARINGS t SUPPLY .690.35 PITTINGS WEA 106127 NLNER COMPANY $1.6B0.38 TOOLS/NARDVARB nK wP .or.P ur .noe_ —.-1 °LOP. rm ____._.._. ... _ .__521.591-r° INSTRUMENT 106130 NAY-RAY° INC. S695.237.62 INSTRUMENT PARTS 106130 THE NEI TN COMPANIES $1.277.62 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3-75636 - 1061]L Ke.•u-SSEJIEYS.-1.01L—,—_____._ _.. __. 10613 KING BEARING. INC. i12.386.26 OLAHICAL PARTS - 106133 NNOR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES fAA.17 17 TOOLS _ FUND NO 9199 JT ➢IST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING nATE 4/P4/9E• PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 rmmTr s3ulieTlnu me RICTx nF SBA"I Iola CLAIMS PAID 04/11/90 POSTING DATE 04/12/94 .-..BRAY. ... urxnne +YT -,� rCrRipTlnu 106134 EASTMAN KODAK CO. $89.9E LAB SUPPLIES 10613 L.R. LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS . PUMP PARTS TPRAURCTTSS 10613 7 LA tl.1NTA MOTOR INN 3212.37 REFUND USER PB8 OVERPAYMENf 1RAJRa a o rea u _-_ -_. _ TD.SSER-b2E-OVeRPAY12N'f--------_-._. 16139 LAV SAFETY SUPPLY CO. f190.96 SAFETY SUPPLIES I06190 H.V. LAYMASTCR 3 CO., INC. f91162.76 SOIL TESTING _ 104. 0 RRAINn ➢PP D EPAY�NT__.-_. 10619E LEARN Y .9 TRAINING MANUALS 1V6143 LE ROT CRANDALL f ASSOC. S2 .216.97 ._..__.. . CEOTECMNIGL INSP¢CTION _ lnuea ( AVID L. L MAX EPDXY ae5O.Ce, ._._ S WER RIEUIGl'ER _____,_ 106195 DAVID L. TOMAY OM INJ. 36.750.4A REFUND RUSERF 106196 LOS ALANITPS CCONO WASH $696.9P R¢FUN➢ USER PEE OVERPAYMENT _ 1061r) Pura In. $91B.27.__-_- CEANOMONI MONITORING 106198 NBC NUCLEAR INC.VIR ONNENTAL $355.94 OCEAN SUPPLIES 106199 NOS NUCLEAR I 3355.99 LAB SUPPLIES 1 06 1551n MMPA Cx➢MEtl a19$197.2b _MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 106152 AINTENANC[ PRODUCTS. INC. $509.52 E POLYURETHANE _ toil.• YeC1Y1 [ QI+CCIY _eLrj.,GC _..... Pl•INI0.1Hp PRrTR__ „______ T 106154 MARSHALL MAINT, PRODUCTIONS 11 f55.00 TRAINING VIDEOS • '+� 106155 MAR VAC ELECTRONICS 947.59 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 16A1RA YI iT . CYI nP. Ixr_ Cx.)p9 Z5._. RLPCTRT f. 511PPL1RB . 146157 MCKr NNA ENGP. f EQUIP. f2.303.5d PACKING MATERIALS 106159 MCLEAN MIDWEST f11598.SP AIR CONDITIONER Y I 1n61Re E.S. MEANS CR x PP Y rr. 774.65. PUBLICLCAI�PARIR__- +'Z 106161 R.S. MEANS CO., INC. f153.26 MILEAGE 306161 TM OM AS P. MCL TON $I%R.Y6 COMPUTE ++ 206163 MIDLAh30 FGYPCORR S3B7.15 COMPPIPE SUPPLIES LIES 106164 NINE ISO MFG. CORP. $909.92 PIPE SVPPLILI 1061.5 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES AS CO. f909.9P SAFETY SUPPLIES _ 106166 _ MONTUByxxl rnxxnxrR n rCi_._-_ vew.yy _REFUND USEB_[EE _ 196167 MONTGOME CARPETS f990.80 REFUND VICE FEE OVERPAYMENT 106167 MONTGOM EPT LABORATORIES $B113A.00 LAB L SERVICES _ 106369 MORTONY SUIRELSALT CO, OR 215.4R _SMALL HARDWARE; 106170 MOTION SALT AND/OR f111.31 SALT 1p"TV MOTION IN CELLULAR INC. f69.31 MECHANICAL PARTS _ 1n6n1 NATIONAL HEAT THE Rr Ru CrkCO. _ __._. u9.b2 CRLL�PRFREEEO __-..._- 196173 NATIONAL PLAT TREATING COINING 3220.2E VACUUM USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT 106173 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES. INC. $3.56E.l0 VACUUM TRUCK FEES y 106175 OCA,LDSUL_$BFFTYCO. rO11N f.11 _ $813.24 _FITTINGS PEES l06175 NEWA SUPPLY CO. fB13.89 POSTINGS m 106176 NE 4A PK CLEC TR Ou]CS s01 S.EM INSTRUMENT PARTS +•__ 106177 OVENAM _NT___- _ 10617 NORDSTROM $56.93 VBC PREOVERPAYMENT 106179 NORTHWEST ROTOR WELDING, INC. i9.500.00 MECHABLCAI. PARTS FUAU x0 9195 - JT DIST MORNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/49/9: PAGE RTPORT NUMBER AP93 —__ rnuuT.Y3AkJ.TAi10P nwrc vre OF. ne.nCC rnux.v CLAIMS FA7p 09/I1/90 POSTING PATE Y/I1/90 LJMAnn eNr W _ vrun n. __- nrerv,P[,nu ____ 106300 OFFICE PAVILION/1117ERTDR P.LS. S9,059.37 OFFICE FURNITURE J-7-4 .__.__ PUBLIGA7ION --__._-___ .____ 106182 THE OHNART COPP 62,008.9E INSTRUMENT PARTS 106183 ORANGE BEARING. INC. 5162.67 BELTS _ cu. - 1061P5 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO FARTS CO. S1S7.41 TRUCK PARTS 106166 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. 6780.91 REFUND USSR PEE OVERPAYMENT 106188 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $281.27 MECHANICAL PARTS 106189 ORANGE VALVE B FITTING CO. $358.86 FITTINGS n•ALSFESSING 106192 COUNTY OF ITANIF 62,953.D•. DATA NGElSSINC 'iSRVICSS 106192 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 313.228.9P REI10UR6C WORKER'S COMB` INSVRANCE 10619 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY S859.55 CASKET 106195 PACIFIC PARTS fllA.% BATfBBIES l9 APSTHONE SERVICES _ "fn 1^.6197 PACIFIC BELL 629.99 SBLEPtlONE SERVIC65 1 x 166198 P6CTCL CELLULAR 65R.IE CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES CTRIC.PARTS -._. .n W 10620L PATHFINDER INSTRUMENTS $125.35 ELECTRICAL PARTS 106262 PHOTO t SOUND [O. 5125.OS REPAIRS 146203 PLASTIC INDUSTRIES f14 1.91 PLASTICS '—`D (467pe POLYPURE. INC. $19.657.29 FOLYMAR M.O.8-9-89,1-10-90 s I LOAIDS nury r1E,r TPn c ' rp_ u26..J2— __--PJ,ECTRiC3UPP1165 "CI 111211 POWER SPECIALISTS. INC. $46.93 MIGHT IP6207 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE S72.60 ICE ^ T•OYiMSEtCPI0LN.0.B !0•RB 1CF269 R.F.M. ELECTRIC MOTORS S4,877.39 ELECTRIC MOTOR 166215 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $856.99 TRAStl MOVAL _ 10621 Prfrr. Pxf_ ..e•un_nn _. SILDGLRENOVAL-tl.0.3+11-BL.___. __-__.__..._ 106212 REOI EXPRESS 579. 0 SUPPLIES I06213 THE REGISTER S1,I95.60 NOTICES A ADS .n[215 n Nr I LT[ - nn I021 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. S2.433. INSTRUMENT PARTS8INOS 1462I6 RICnAFOS. WATSON t GCPSION 9 10,137.92 LEGAJ SERVICES 6-LL-86 l L. 106 [any075.31 RlC SUPLIEVICCS J-20. .- ..____ _-_._ ._-_... 106219 ROYAL WHOLESALE LESALE ELECALCTRIC f2$692.66 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 106219 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC f692.64 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES ___1Il622n ed[crr.n rru roeoc_ aPaa_dn. . vevSv n neuvP 106222 SANTA ANT ELECTDESIGNS MOTORS $4,519.97 OFFCIIRICICES PARS 106222 SEA Cm DESIGNS f9.519.fi1 OFFICE EQUIPMENT _ 106ll�224 SEAR n[ Orel wf[f• TOOLR.D6'EAGE_ ... __ 106225 SEARS, ROEBUCK 6 CO. S369.95 TOOLS 1062ES $NANRDEM SUPPLY $1,600.7A tlAPDNAIIL u FUND NC ela9 - JT 9151 WORKING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/u4/9. PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNI.LSAW TAT•^LL-0IS714II 01_.ORANGE. CLAIMS PAID 04/11/90 POSTING DATE i4/11/90 '_-LAERA4LE➢�- v¢ynnR AUUN1-...... . -- lot.226 SILVER SPRINGS RATER 43.131.4E REFUND USSR PEE OVERPAYMENT 10622 SO.T ENTRY CO. 9.01' BOIL TASTING M.0.6-14-89 106229 CO 30. COAST Alp UUA LI TT 596 3$89.4: APPLICATION FEES ` -1➢4232-_. en. rw ASTcr R QUALITY 10A232 SO. COAST AIR DUALITY 31.95B.RC APPLICATION PE85 1062]7 30. COAST AIR DUALITY 32E5.0P TRUCK-FARTS .n.231 Cnuru RN C E �A.41, ..._TRUCK-FARTS- ... 106235 SOUTHERN CALIF.AEDIS ED130N CO. 36.799.3E POWER 1M443S S0. CALIF. CDI SON CO. 36.723.DU POKER POLE RELOCATION E 10623 UESTALLOT O $1,648.74 MOLS/WLDLNG SUPPLIES 106278 GREECE SPEEDOMETER $75.74 TOILER TESTING ''..._._ _106249 -Mi3N--T. STE-SURREY-CO--_._ $116.8 f.. .. ....._ --_.-.COOLS l06242 NARK N. STCINVA NOEP 3936.72 EACRUP CLAIM I Bf 2r1 STERLING APT lS6.T2 GRAPHIC SUPPLIES 1py2.0 a°11. �u^" 7.27 __.-_____�NDTOCRAPNif^38RYICAE ---.. '.` m lOET43 SUPP.IT STEEL 52,387.27 STEEL '.' X 136244 SUPELCO. INC. 3218.2P LAS SUPPLIES IDA246 CONTINENCYL AIR .�256.1 �-' 106247 CONTINENTAL PIP TOOL. INC. 312.156.14 TOOLS 106TN TAGG INK YAGGON M061LMOME PARK 1106.72 REFUND USER R8e OV¢9PAYM8NT i-ID623$_ T ORPE INSULATION 116250 TIRE RE INSULATION $33.51 BUILDING MATERIAL ti n 106250 TIME 4O710N TOOLS s]S.3I SMALL TOOLS 106253 TOTAL PREVENTION SYSTEMS $466.00 ELECTRIC PA SERVICES P1-27-1 106253 N.D. TRERICI CO. i206.78 ELECTRIC PARTS -__TRUE• KER A UAR,SON, INC. STR-PANTS-----..__.__.__..__..__._... 106255 J.G. TUCKER 3 SON, INC. ,913.60 SOIL TESTING PART 1 u6236 TWIN INC• LAF OP ATOR ICS OF {5.313.60 SOIL TESTING 14-89 ....___-1G625T-___-lE0SLY0YNi ANILC7-16AL-....._,..__-.__._._._. .__3173r1.1__.._._..._._._ . ._.. INSTRUMENT RePAIRPAI0. ._.. _.._. ... ._ _ 1E6238 UNOCAL $240.61 UNLEADED GASOLINE 106259 UNITED ELECTRIC SUPPLY 539.14 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES i._.___106260. - UPJOHN HEALTHCARE EACE63LEY1ARVICES 25.6!__-____._..JPRL¢LyNRVICEs_-___-_.... . . 106261 UPSO[V MEALY"CAT. SERVICES $125.00 CPR RMENINC I OC 262 VMS [VISUAL "GAT. SYSTEMS) 35.664.AS INSTRUMENT VWR S.CSESIING_--_.._____...._._______.. 666.OU--...._.__. _ . ..1'ESTIUPPLIESICBSTERS 106265 YVP SCIENTIFIC 92,566.46 LEE SUPPLIES 106265 YAd TIO NLAND 32.566.46 BEYOND S- PE! OVERPAYIE:NT 106266--- VAI. rr INSTRUMENT GY_60... ..... ._... .______.-34,124.33-__. ._-_._ _...INSlITTRUME_- 10C26T VEMIAN SYSTEMS GROUP $5,235.31 INSTRUMENT PARTS i. 1 RE7E8 VER ICN SYSTCNS 35.235.00 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 10RTEX INDUSTRIE.SUECLY-.____... ...___.__., ..--122.➢6......_.. -_._._.._. DOOR R 106271 JOAT EN INDUSTRIES 9533.52 DOUR REPAIR 106771 JOMN R. VAR LES i53].52 ODOR CONTROL CONSULTANT i. FUND NO 41-9 JT LIST WOP.NINC CAP17AL Ff OCESSINO DATE 4/Y4/9. PACE 7 NIFORI NUMBER AP43 ------- ----.-- ^••�I F-StNIJ SJIUN-OZS7R-I Gib--OF ORANGE COUNTV--- CLAIRS FAIR 04/ll/94 POSTIN:. ORTC •4/11/90 --YaRRLYJJID ••e.NFMR •M:IL 4J--._____ _-DESCAlRT10N -._-__. 106272 CARL WARREN A CO. S426.116 INSURANCE CLAIMS AOMINISTYNR ---.--IC6274 -WESTERNSPACAB06.� --- --i6I.93_______ IC6275 WESTERN STATE C EQUIPMENT SUPPLY CO. f761.08 CAUSTIC S RENI'Al 146275 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPVLT fI8FE37.W CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-9-119 • 6276 WEROX CORP, EONA 4-B OR 6 COTTERALEAS -_ IL6277 •ERRS CORP. f7.679.22 COPIER LEASES 10A278 6COR 6E YAROLCY ASSOCIATES s569.57 VALVE —IC6280 EVERA_L3ND`ORN CO •••••^ ^••R - 9?.-66 -_.-.ENGINMBUT_R6NTAL_.___.__—... ..- .__- IC6280 RICHARD H. TORN CO. f497.1[ ENGINE PARTS 106281 P1Cx eP0 YOUNG PROD. f559.59 OFFICE SIIPPLI¢S -- 10623 7LNDERSOM R 3.OD�1A-- -----_._. NSTRUCTIONJ-195---_____... 106283 R8INOEBBON CORP. $225,000.00 CONSTRUCTION J-19-2 ------- TOTAL CLAIMS PAID i 2.923.910.90 ---._ _. -___- _-- SUMMARY ANOINT T Ft OPER FUND i F2 OPBR FUND 5.128.00 to 12 CAP FAC;FUND 2,962.58 }� 03_B .INtID F3 CAP FAC FUND 626.50 35 OPER FIND 735.57 M 95 CAP-LAC FUND S O,�Y 20-_- V I6 OPER FUND 226.00 --_- - - 06 CAP FAC FUND 4.71 IL OPER FOND LZ R9R A6 R7 CAP FAC FUND 3.229.94 _ III OPER FUND 4,319.12 f13 OVER FUXO - %li OPER RRUND 20.53 _ F14 CAP FAC FUND 5,386.40 8566-CALFA£F110) ._2A.599.99 _ 1667 OPER FUND 2.274.67 07614 OPER FUND 2.035.92 JL_4F&s FUNK __564.y49.19 CORF 2,044,463.55 SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FUND 13,922.72 DIST MOWINcCAllin'FUND _. _212,846.24 f 2.923.910.90 FUND NO 4194 - JT DIST WORMING CJFIUL PROCESSING DATE 4119/9O PAGE I REPORT NUM.NCR AP43 COUNTY SAI.ITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY -------- -- ---CCfTM'S"F4'Tll'tiTl23791r POSTE NG"D7TF'Ti'/23190"--- -' WARRANT NO. VENDOR -_-__----AMOUNT -- _-- DESCRIPTION 1062-7 ACCESS ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS f438.25 LAS SUPPLIES 106298 GEORGE ADAMS JR. $7.844.15 BMA PANORAMA REIMB AGREEMENT _ _.__lOS R99-.--.-'Ati PENCE�OFFE'CE-3ERViC .Vn9E50.-'' .. __oirPIC6 UIPHENT 106300 STASIA ALLEN $64.26 KLUGE EXPENSE 106301 LEASING ASSOCIATES/ALLSTATL 41.293.32 - AUTOMOBILE LEASES _ -.-.--TOB302--ZiT•'ETT-3UP➢ET-ANFN7CF..—.-'-. --52.23.... - -__ P€T§TY SUPPLIEe 106303 AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY $1.752.62 FILM 106304 AMERITECH 197.75 COPIER LEASE _ _--_TOSS03--ANANCTI "EP-CONSTPUCTION_... �DT379:89._ ._.. SEL(ER'ESPAIR3 HE 2.7.14 10630E ARCO VALVE L PRIMER CORP 6180.08 VALVE 106307 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $2.115.55 NOTICES 6 ADS _--1PGSDB-�fPFLY'RNE .�--_- --•-=Ti6T6:Pc_.___..__._ TEin1L1-RYA¢ V 106309 ARATCM SERVICES. INC. $3.90.35 UNIFORM RENTALS - 10631D ARNCL DEVCLDPMCNT CO. 6535.27 REFUND PLAN CHECK 09BR DEPOSIT ---'I0f311 "A52➢CTATCO-CONCRE7ETR0➢:TZR ri39:40. '-. ___..____ _SUTLOYN�F4� . , - 106312 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING 1160.9C SOIL TESTING 106313 AREA - CORP. OF COASTAL AGENCY 1350.00 REGISTRATION^ -I➢G —STf ---FrELOF♦-DTSPOSTLCTPP SITr" fC27 ZTS RT.-._.___-- CRIf'0X6VU H.D.TP-95 - ITTX 106315 F.W. BAPOTTI AND ASSOC. 55.58C.OL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PI-14-162.P2-37 106316 0. BATEMAN _-___1595 - _ _ - DEFERRED COME DISTRIBUTION -.T. 10SSS7---.V:A-BAUEREETR—.—_._. f290:'n.C__..___ _ - DEP533r REFDND 'a•CFS 106318 BARTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $2.602.16 LAB SUPPLIES 106319 HOWARD BLEVINS 1200.RD DEFERRED OTHERDISTRIBOn M iDG320----FOTSE-Dl3 CiDE-OFFITF-F P'ODUCTS-"--- f57i.35'-'--""'----SfCE SUPPLIES 7; lA 106321 POLSA RADIATOR SERVICE 1143.13 RADIATOR REPAIR M 106322 BON-A-RUES $126_26 TRUCK PARTS -'M"`--1Df323--_.-.-RDYL'CTNG WEEP TA4-CORP— -. -_RM30.93 -._..�CITTEPJtN SERVICCES 7-11 106324 BRAGG CRANE 1 RIGGING CO. $762.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 166325 BRIM - MAR 1 11.225.54 REFUND PLAN CHECK OVER DEPOSIT _ __-�D'G32G--NERPTFTBRVNN-- ---8@POSYR-REFUND 106327 FROWN 4 CALDWELL CONSULTINE 53.273.90 ENGINEERING SERVICES US 89-45 106328- PURRS ENGINEERING CO. 61.498.90 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES _---106329-_—..Ts1151r"ANO-'ASSOCTATL3i INC.J."' .....__--_ __ST.43T.D0-.._._____.____SURVEVI0T I99VfUffjZi-fB-7 — _ A06330 GARY G. STRECO f2.464.35 PETTY CASH REIMBURSO0IMT 1063.31 BY-PRODUCTS MANAGEMENT. INC. _ $30,419.24 FERIOUS CHLORIDE M.0.4-12-89 --TgW33Y--CPT-CORE:-/-SUNRTT'SOLUT70NT-""- —'--55i72£BT-- 5EROTDCAOREEMI 106333 CAL-GLASS FNP RESCARCM. INC. $1,111.02 LAB SUPPLIES 106334 C.LTAOL . INC. 43.154.61 REGULATOR PARTS - 106336 CAROLLO-NOTLE.A JOINT VENTURE f1010.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES I-9 d 106337 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $34,666.31 SUMMERING SERVICES 3-15 7063 SP__-__CA3rP11YCP"L-E➢DIFXCNT.-.._-'. 153:1 106339 JOHN CASON $3.667.50 MECHANICAL PARTS 7. 106340 CENTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTLM $6.357.13 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 7--" 206S4T----ZENTRAC-FOEN7'S'OFTWARCTNC-'- --""'-" -"f75700 ------`- --' —SUBSCRIPTION 106342 CENTURY PAINT $781.28 PAINT SUPLIES ...__ _.. ._ ........._... ._. w FUND NO 9199 - JT UIS1 WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/19/9L PACE p k FPOPT NUMBER AF43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ARANFL COUNTY -fLA Ms JTAto ua/2T/46"-"PodrixG DATE .9%fB%93___ WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 106343 CHALLENGE GEARING t IND• $FLY S63.73 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 106399 PENNY CMARTIER $250.00 DEPOSIT REFUND 1063TS—._-F11EVkONU.3.A.. INC_._ - ___ __ SI .ST2.9S.... . _ UNU6�nED GASOLINE -" 106346 WILLIAM R. CLARNE 9619.54 DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF -•'' 106347 C.I.E.S. • CO. . INC. _ $1.941.00 IdCtlAUIGL PARTS 1 B3 Ti6— --tOMIIN[$3lFA-CSRi 6FitT�'iS�iF-C4L IT' f26.319.65 POMP PARTS 106349 COMPUTER DRTACOM S922.21 PRINTER RIBBONS 106350 COMPUSERVE $21.56 COMPUTER SERVICES 106351-'—__._fONNFCI'G:IrPrARTB-7"DTV:'__. _SEF"9A9._. - TRUCK EART -- 106352 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. $7.044.72 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 136353 CONTAINERIZLD CHEMICAL D13POSA $975.50 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL _ __ BCuEPRIKTINC N.OT-11-89 10655E CONTROL CABLES. INC. $44.10 TRUCK PACTS SCE356 COOPER INDUSTRIES. INC. 9129.083.02 ENGINES M.O. 5-13-87.6-8-89, J-19A -- 106357- -'--'-LUSTY NESR I�DIN 4UPD CY - --'- -- '-- ---TSi2T9.19 .. 106359 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC f944.67 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 106359 CHEMPAD ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES S1.253.98 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ___wu-lf mT RkE ITl 106361 LARRY CUPTI TRUCK L ECUIFMLNT f25.080.00 SLUDGE REMOVAL X.O.4-13-88 X 106362 STATE OF CALIF. DEPT. OF GEN. $99.CC PUBLICATION :-�"--IO636S-- STATE"OF'-C7LIFDMNTA --& -GG:OS_ t 106364 STATE OF CALIFORNIA f16O.Cp BBC PROCESSING m 106365 STATE OF CALIFORNIA S255.11 DIRECT. USE I" _TC60:O0._.....____ BSB'FROCESSINC PEF 106367 DAILY PILOT f43.50 NOTICES A ADS Lw 106366 DANIELT TIRE SERVICE 52.091.92 TIMES 3-- 166369--.—OANTE-COA0RDCTFDff —___. EEET�- 106370 DESKTOP GRAPHICS L DESIGN S36.00 GRAPHICS SUPPLIES 106371 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $573.75 OUTSIDE PRINTING SPACE RENTAL S-7T— - 106373 DUMB EDWARDS CORP. 9702.80 PAINT SUPPLIES 106374 OVALS SALES $357.9. !@LHAXICAL PARTS _._..__.1Y�009:6E-.--__ . . 106376 ERA SERVICES. INC. $20.637.97 CONSULTING SERVICES P2-44 196377 ENSECO-CHL $3.700.40 OCEAN SAMPLING 106379 ECOANALYSIS. INC. S2.A1..17 eCEAN MONITORING 106380 ECOSYSTEMS ENGINELk2NC t Ak AL♦ .7.150.OS OCEAN RESEARCH -151 . 2__-. _._ __ _. .._._ PUMP PARTS _ 106382 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. f459.40 LAB SAMPLES 106303 MARSHALL FAIRRES 1 $350.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION ._.....106389 --_-="-E-"tKCNSTE7M-s.F;- --_-CWSTRUCT7DNSERVTCE3T-7- .6-7=3if —_ 106385 FDR SALES R SERVICE $2.332.99 FILTERS 106386 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. f293.00 AIR PREICXT -^..-.-- IBG3NT'--"'"'F[PNELI GAT"--__._ _ _._. .._ .._._.______SST:f3. __..___--_ _._ ._-.PROPANE— — _ ' 106368 FICO•S APPLIANCE SERVICE $207.12 VACUUM BELT FUND NO 91P4 JT DIST WORKING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 4119/90 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 106309 MICHAEL J. FILECCIA 6162.63 DEFERRED COP PAYOFF 10639D FISCHER 6 PORTER CO. $2.466.97 FLOW METER .__.__.._.101539I'----P SMER'IClTNTTPT V ` 3._.. . .- ...._.._.______.i" EtTPPLIES 206392 FLO•SYSTEMS 68.444.55 PUMP PARTS 106393 FLUID COMPONENTS. INC. $9.742.12 INSTRUMENT PARTS _..--'--T S6'594--'---'YLbTG'TtNOLYWGSTSTCMS'..._.._.-.__._..._-__�T 106395 CLIFFORD A. FORNERT 1669.01 ENGINEERING SERVICES 106396 FOUNTAIN VOLLEY CAMERA $369.Tt F[LM `-'-I46397-.i-YTTT"bP-F'OUNTNTN-9RTLT'F-.-v-'-.-.-_ "Z9-..__-_ 106398 FOX ENTERPRISES $1,825.00 SAFETY CONSULTANT 106399 FOXBORO CO. / HAS SYSTEMS 364.01 MACHINE PART _-_%va4lTC JAT*"FRf I1'C if- ._-_ _.-. .T .G7- _. -.-__---_ DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF 106A01 FREEWAY TRUCK PARTS $299.75 TRUCK PARTS - 106402 A.F. FREY 1105.5U DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 206404 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $3.231.36 LUMBER 106405 CATE'S FIBERGLASS INSYALLLRS 35.418.75 FIBERGLASS WORK _--'T0'E'446SAFLI-Y SUPPLIES ---G[NETtt-NYIt?T?AMS-S�[RVYO+r- -- -(_: X 1U6407 GENERAL TELEPHONE CP. $6.553.37 TELEPHONE 106408 GERHARD7•S. INC. i561.J1 INSTRUMENT PARTS .;' -'2'06499—`-'-L'ttRLTCF•MITCHLCCTTNG-_._.__._. ._.__..__ .._.__. _-..-lF29T7T4':65.•_. _.____.. .__MCGIOTIcAE-PART 106420 GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION il.ROD.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 106411 SON GREEK L ASSOCIATES 34.507.50 SURVEYING SERVICES US 88-72 '10t4T MACHINE REPAIR 106413 HACH COMPANY i1S1.58 LAB SUPPLIES 106414 FRED A. HARPER 'I.995.51 pEFERRPA COMP DISTRIBBTION 'Va---10E'4T0 MAKE AGTON-INOOSTRTRT"1'L RST7C5—___.-_-�1_- .96___._--___-_V��PAlTS7Pi,FPIR 166416 HATCH A KIRK, INC. 1L.844.91 MECHANICAL PARTS 106437 HATFIELD DEVELOPMENT CO $2.667.92 REFUND PLAN CHECK OVER DEPOSIT 106419 PYLES S. HIGASMIRURA $4.59 MILEAGE EXPENSE 1 1i617V HIGH VOLTAGE ELECTF IC 6TDO.Pi ELECTRIC PARTS -. .. 106421 -HIGH SENMAR"REGISTWITIOR— .- 106422 HOLRPIGER C.V.S. CALIF. . INC. 1653.81 COMPRESSOR PARTS 106423 DONALD D. MONDMICHL $300.04 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION --.-?06424 --TTOOP" CAMERA- R"­--- RUIN LAMM . 106425 HOP170N HIGH-REACH 663.95 YRUCK PARTS 106426 P.S. HUGHFS CO.. INC. 12-0.59 PAINT SUPPL185 P6y.2T-----tITT'-OF-HUNTINGT Hl­RrAC Y---.__.-_..-__-_.- 106428 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STAMP 9111.56 RUBBER STAMPS 106429 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHWINN CYCL $101.84 BICYCLE PARTS LIXIM IB6431 [MERCY SEAVICES GP016 $129.67 ENGINE PARTS 106432 IMPERIAL VEST CHEMICAL tT5.249.70 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-08-89 •�-r--_. 108435- 1'NOUSTPY RL-IHRCYDCOTROOUCI3-� 7- __M 106434 INFILCO UEGREMONT. INC. $47.897.00 BAR SCREENS SPEC 9-178 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4119/91 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMOCR AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS DF ORANGE COUNTY S PITDff 01725F90'-'TRUMN GVATE"D WE r/ -- WARRANT NO. VENDOR ANOUNT _ DESCRIPTION 106433 INGRAM PAPER f2.734.16 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 106436 THE IRVINE CO. f3.974.0 "FUND PLAR (STOCK OVER DEPOSIT —I0E13T--JRCKTCNATIO "f1 03._.____-._ 106438 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP. 1 604.71 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 106459 JONN GTO NE SUPPLY .549.98 ntOTRIC SUPPLIES --------------ST2T.9i_.._. 106441 NALLCEN.S COMPUTER SUPPLIES $729.93 OFFICE SUPPLIES 106442 KARAM BEARINGS f SUPPLY $36.54 BEARINGS ,Y 'EV6193' K3NEH"CUNPIYRV'---_--.— 106444 KARLEE COMPANY 9652.21 PAINT 106445 FLEET EQUIPMENT CORP. f19.650.95 ELECTRIC CARTS OF AUUURS --- �273P' 106447 KAY-PAY, INC. $854.66 INSTRUMENT PARTS 106448 KEIIH-STEVCNS. INC. $3,077.92 ENGINEERING SERVICES 6P19— RNTN4TiN0-- 106450 DONALD E. NINNE.Y $146.97 DEFERRED CORP DISTRIBUTION 206451 KNOK INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 1130.17 ____ GAUGE m 10SASS MARTIN KORDICK, SP $2.�1365 3 r CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 14--IBA >t 106454 MORNLANO BUILDING $837.56 REFUND PLAN CHECK OVER DEPOSIT __-7� SDTLAE-cBecK oveR'UEeo3EI- 106456 LEIRMTON 6 ASSOC. S9.E71.01 LABB SERVICES 106457 LE ROY CRINDALL f ASSOC. f7.632.59 ClOTECUIICAL SERVICES 6VSR "TIFP.INI"CORPOR'ATTU�--_.--- 106460 LINE TORQUE CORP. 14.406.23 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES W 106460 - K.P. LINOSTBOM. INC. f4.q P6.23 CONSULTING SERVICES - MASTER PLAN n -T06 V61 —JOEN-LTSt['PVNPT"THEY--____ f31i519.65... _—. PUMP PARTS-- .. 106462 LOCAL AGENCY $1.500.00 LAFCO PEE X06463 LOCAL AGENCY 6753.0^ LAFCO PEE YAK 106465 MRS fg4.41 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 106466 MAJOR LOCK SUPPLY 11399.50 SAFETY SUPPLIES —_-TOE 9ET RRR'EIPm. Vhl="TUP7tiT--.. 106468 PARSHALL HAIRY. PRODUCTIONS $191.00 INSTRUCTIONAL VIDEOS ib 106469 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $11.22 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES — EV IrIIFC'C.- 106471 MCNCNNA ENGR. R EQUIP. $2,004.93 FREIGHT 106472 PCMASTLR-CARP SUPPLY CO. _ $1HI3.b4 HARDWARE 1064 74 MOTION' INOU STR IE S. INC. S2C3.48 MECHANICAL PARTS 106475 MOTOROLA. INC. f669.38 PACERS ____.10G4TS---KOMPOEitCCCURR'SENVTCCT..--_—_ -T50�"3'- -.—.—tEECpCpE-yylyPRpgE 106477 NATIONAL LUMBER f555.64 HARDWARE/LUMBER IC6478 NATIONAL PLANT SEPVICLS, INC. 61.099.00 GENERAL INSPECTION 'Y069T9--190TTON61'TLCMNi CAl'TNFOR MATTON"'"'----"""--lIT7:5 C'_.._ 106480 NATIONAL VISUAL SYSTEMS f917U7.63 PANELING FUND MO 91P9 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FROCESSINC DATE 4/I4/9C {'AGE _ REPORT NUMBER 4*43 COUNTY .SANITATION DISTRICTS DF OPANCE COUNTY _-- --- ---' --------- CCAIMS PAIU-V4725/SG-"-➢6STIRG DATE'P4/2579ti WARRANT_NO. VENDOR AMOUNT _ DESCRIPTION 2064AI --- REAL SUPPLY CO. --'-- _—_- $81.66 HARDWARE 106482 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH S4.0P WATER UNEASE _—_%I T:OC 106464 ERIC NIENUES 62.404.12 DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF 106465 N.C. NOTTINGMAM CO, INC. $693.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES - PUMPING —^.._7HFiH�-7(DYF[L-STLErESUP('LTLi1—T Rt_...... _.. ___��63:75..._._ _ ..._.._stun _. 106487 O.M.S./SOLAG DISPOSAL CO S1.872.6f TBASU BIN REMOVAL 106486 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $298.94 SAFETY CLASSES OFFTCTA1-1TNCINE-GO70EB-- "--'-'—'t2G6:06 _- SYBSCHIPSION 106496 DV SYSTEMS CO. 628.379.17 CHLORINE H.0.2-14-90 106491 CYNTHIA O-NEIL $36.4U MILEAGE EXPENSE 6 EXPENSE -- ID6493 ORANGE BEARING. INC. $255.55 FITTINGS 30(494 ORAWGE COAST ELECTRIC SUFPLY S147.76 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES _._-_.._.106495--.--OWi r-EODNTY- UTVPAATS_CD. .___ - 106496 ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING SERVICE SRS0.00 ROAD STRIPING 106497 ORANGE VALVE C FITTING CO. $514.63 i17TINGS —�uA,9w--ORTGEv=RvTET _ -.. _ _-_ � 5:35__ .._._.___ -seeciAl.TY GASES 'm 1064.9 COUNTY Of ORANGE S1.875.11C WASTE HAULER SATE PEGS 106500 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $6,153.11 DEFERRED COME` DISTRIBUTION 706501--' --COUNTY-SRNITBTMrOTSTRTR -REIMBURSE WORXEA4 COMP INSURANCE inU 186502 PC MAGAZINE 961.97 SUBSCRIPTION -' 106503 PSI 6951.117 INSTRUIBNT REPAIR [#— iOE5O9— __._TRIFTL'FLT(i5 _._.__._ _..-_.___.._ —__I9'i f22:T1�..._. _.- IffCW1NLCAL PARTS 'by 106505 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. 63.666.1: SAFETY SUPPLIES - 1 196506 PACIFIC DELL 527.53 TELEPHONE —106507—"—'➢AIRE'-v-RSSOC7BTES­--"-- --CONNOZTIRC-PUBLIC RCLAYIONS MST 106505 PARS UNLIMITED S1.624.70 TRUCK PARTS 106509 ROY PENOENGRAFT $445.9f DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION .._..___ I4657V-_ _. ____�OTG�'SDONO'CR:-_--._.__ .._ _. . .._.__�__..4T7:78_._.__. . __ __.___PBSJEESUR R22A 106511 PICKWICK PAPER 1291.03 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 106S12 LIMA GNP SVSTEMS. IPC. $44,039.14 SLUDGE REMOVAL H.0.5-11-86 306513. __ FTTNR 'ROVES __..___ _. _ __. _.____SISA;5P. - ._..- PO6TAGELffiTER-RENTAL - -. 106S14 POLYPUPC. INC. $23.460.18 POLYMERS H.O.1-10-9D.8-9-89 106515 POWER CLECTRO SUPPLY CO. $982.76 ELECTRIC S@PLIES STn.GZ --.- ICE 106517 PROCESS EQUIPMENT COPPANY 61.316.OP SEATS 10651E THE PROJECTS SOLUTION C:.. S4.028.00 INSTRUIBNTATION INSPEC710N M.0 8-IO.88 ➢UHET SN..__.______ _._. - . .__ ...-__._SRS:9S- __. . . . .__..__._ 101ISCRIP1I09---- 106520 R M CONTROLS $533.43 CHARTS 106521 P.P.N. ELECTRIC MOTORS 52.631.S4 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS P6522---__ "T CSTSTE-DEVCEOFPCIIT' COFF. REMPLARCHECK-OVER-DEMBIT-_ -- IG6523 REF.YC. INC. 186.64G.UP SLUDGE REMOVAL H.0.5-11-88 106524 REP VALVE CO.. INC. 22.361.62 VALVE PARTS __. . .. 1CG525-- VEP 1"NG-SHOES_._._. .._. ._ ._ __-..__ _ 64sv:. 9 ._ . .. _ ._.-- SAPETYSHOES 106526 REPUBLIC ENGINES $146.15 TRUCK PARTS s FUND NO 91P9 JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL RPOCESSINF DATE 4119/90 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMSC4 AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANF.L COUNTY -CCAIMS'PAIO_09/2S/90'_P0'Sn WG" DATE WARRANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT_ DESCRIPTION 106527 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. $926.95 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 166528 RFNOLD POWER TRANSMISSION ___- 394.32 _ _ , _ _ MECHANICAL PARTS "' """-1➢6579- _- RICTIAl1w WATSDN-S 6ERSNOK SGTFO.4P LEGAL SERVICES N.0.6-11-86 106530 ROSERTS 6 SONS COAST. CO. $484.93 REFUND PLAN CEECK OVER DEPOSIT 104531 ROONEY-HUNT CO. $687.44 .. GATE PARTS wOYLr_rNrr DRENT-__ SY' S9.13-. --..- i3NrR6�i PARTS 106533 RYAN-KERCO $272.46 HARDWARE 106534 S.R.F. MACHINERY ENG.. INC. ...__..._.. _._-. $605.63 MECHANICAL PARTS SETTTV=RCEEN"COR�_____._ 3152._9D_. ..__..-.. .PARYSZLFANEA-. __.. 106536 SAFFEL 6 MC ADAM $409.20 REFUND PLAN CRECH OVER DEPOSIT if ID6537 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT•L __. _ S28032.39 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-14-89 1065 3P---3EACLIPFC�EV ECaF MEhTTO. -�Sd'J-."0: -_ -" "'"'" REPUNU-PWT$XECII OVER DEPOSIT _ 106539 SHAMROCK SUPPLY SI.J65.2f HARDWARE T 10f540 SHEPHERD MACHINERY CO. _ $80.47 _ ENGINE PARTS E➢IFON:ER6P:TNT:__.._ ....__.____._. -_-SY.TiI:[i.._..... ..___.ENGSNEERIN-MRVICS 106542 SKYPARN WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $940.00 PHYSICAL EXAMS 106543 SMITH-EMERY CO. 02.887.50 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-16-89 _.�_ .---'T 06F•�--SOTC-i RO_TCST7Nr ENV]NEE R3_.- _. .. 9 n . . .__ __.__. SDIL TES IH.O.6-14-89 X 166545 SOUTH COAST DODGE 3245.65 TRUCK PARTS 1D6546 SOUIPCRN CALIF. EDISON CO. - __ _ - . 3391.123.73. POWER ,.� IC6547-.__.__...SOUTHERN PAY_COT-__..__. .9 E EAT- py 106548 SOUTHERN PACIFIC TP ANSPOR. CO. s510.60 EASEMENT AGREEMENT 2-E6 , 106549 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $47.25 DRINKING WATER ' '-- ""14655➢'-'_ -_`SPAFCING7NSTRUIT ENT . - ---__ - -'-3'2P2.7-u" -'-YNStkUFOFF REPAIR ;,by 10EE51 STAMEN 2. SPASSOFF. P.C. $7.200.60 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-162.P1-20.P2-17 1 104 552 UESTALLDY INC. -_ $2.117.91 WELDING SUPPLIES 106555_._--STEA-TOOC`8_S77PPCY CDT -�TsOS'6:73'_.__. . ._. TDOL3- . 106554 STATER BROS. MARKETS 36.695.E7 REFUND PLAN CRECK OVER DEPOSIT 106555 STERLING ART $76.99 GRAPHIC SUPPLIES DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF IC6557 SUSIA. INC. 1265.63 PRESENTATION AIDS 30058 SUN-BELT LANDSCAPC L NAINT. _ 03.847.C0 _ CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.8-9-89 _ _. 706559-____.SOII9ET FORD_____ R75 .__. IRUCK PART3-" . I06560 SURE LCO. INC. SR33 A9 LAB SUPPLIES A' 106061 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL. INC. i31032.3Y TOOLS _-------1'D656E'--SORVCYOR'"ERVTCE-CO2-.......' .._. 3 106565 7ALIN TIFF, INC. 1253.84 TIRES } _ 306564 TAYLOR-OUNN S799.22 TRUCK PARTS _ 10656T -TECH N7CAL-PA OOUC TS"1 CTPLS'_ "-___ .'_______SSP6:/5 `""' MI. 106566 TEKKAR COMPANY $932.71 LAB SUPPLIES 106567 THORPE INSULATION ___ __ $504.12 BUILDING MATERIALS ._. ______._..__ __.. TIME OUTYPCNTTOOLS SNY 'Ell. SMALL TOT 106569 TIME M0 T30N TOOLS 363.39 SMALL TOOLS i; 206570 TINKER A MASON f2.990.3P INSTRUMENT __....-_.1 P 65T TRAVECTf AVE[ '- ..... .. ._ ..- VBL_SSRVICCS 106572 TRUCK 8 AUTO SUPPLY. INC. $234.59 TRUCK PARTS FUND NO 12- - JT UIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/14/90 PAGE 7 REFORT NUMRER AF43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of ORANGE COUNTY WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 166573 J.G. TUCKER B SON, INC. $2,61F.34 INSTRUMENT REPAIR 166574 U.S. AUTO GLASS CENTEN.IY.C. S577.1F cL1SS _......._...-T .—"UmwO lTGTltO. __._......._ _..._.... _-- f?24:60 .,..._____.__-SA _ 106676 THE UNISOURCE CORP. f304.68 OFFICE SUPPLIES 106577 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $245.07 PARCEL SERVICES __.-----_.i PeS'7R---11TR'AT�LLTV}TtR-CDMP}M'__._..---—_.._.._ 306579 VWR SCIENTIFIC $3,322.11 LAB SUPPLIES 106580 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $9J445.07 FITTINGS N' VWEN' PrTFR.r.—__....._._.... - _S1T6T 61.20 .- "-- -- 306582 VARIAN INSTPUMENT GROUP f323.0R LAB SUPPLIES 106583 VERTEA SYSTEMS S2.697.50 COMPMR DATA SUPPORT VTNTTIS'TND115'TRTIR�INPET.___.....__...._..___ LOSSES VILLAGE NURSERIES 928E.54 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 106546 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC t31R.E7 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES . ....---t065tT_—__._TRC"W4PMTNGTONZIIT—___._ __... _. �19':94. _._.._.._..__ �UVER'OB.A. 306586 CARL UARRr.N b CO. $301.00 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR IOL589 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL $97.50 PUBLICATIM m ICE592 WESTERN PACIFIC PRODUCTS. INC, .439.66 RENTAL SIGN X 1Cl592 WESTERN PACIFIC EQUIPMENT Cl­ $1.139.E6 RENTAL EQUIPMENT -�'.-..19 5 5 41----FLSTERro"5'TR'i[-CNERIT}C-SUPPLT_.__ ......._ - ��� 106594 WESTRUM INTERNATIONAL $1,132.57 TRUCK PARTS ' 106595 ROURKE L WOODRUFF 539.077.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.6-4-89 _ o 106597 RICHARD P. COGAN M------- _$200 0b DEFERRED COWS DISTRIBUTION TOTAL CLAIMS MAID 04/25/90 $1.660.364.26 r_zueszzzacczzzs BNeMARY AMOUNT '.... .. 14... ..- .—._...__.._....._....._._-_...__.................. ._.. .._._—_f.._.— 135.72 ._.. . .. ._ . .... .__._.__. 02 7,065.34 O2 5.706.39 •.SANS]_..___...___.._.. 05 5.748.40 05 1,791.34 06 2,473.93 f7 34,794.06 ., 011 6,749.59 014 28,456d36.1616 1566 271.45 _ --� ----- 271.45 0667 11.519.63 3.A2Qj4— JT OPER FUND 946,387.45 ._ CORP 354,973.08 .........,SELF_UNDBD WMEIRS..9"? INSURANCE JT DIST NONI:INO CAPITAL L86.375.58 i L6fi8.3fiA.28 '•� BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127 a 10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County, California fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 JOINT BOARDS AGENDA SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS WEDNESDAY, JUNE 13, 1990 - 7 : 30 P.M. RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 A minute excerpt has been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item No. 4, it is appropriate to receive and file said excerpt: DISTRICTS 3 (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpt from the City of Seal Beach re election of mayor and appointment of alternate Director and seating a new member of the Board: (*Mayor) District Active Director Alternate Director 3 Edna Wilson* Frank Laszlo (ADDITIONAL ITEMS LISTED ON PAGE 2) SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS - 6/13/90 The following items are hereby submitted o the Boar as o Directors for discussion and action at the regular meeting date and time set forth above. The need to take the recommended action arose subsequent to the agenda being posted on June 6, 1990. In order for action to be taken on this item, the Boards of Directors shall first determine by a two-thirds vote of the Board members, or if less than two thirds of the members are present, a unanimous vote of those members present, that the need to take this action arose subsequent to the agenda being posted. If the Supplemental Agenda includes items for the Joint Boards and/or one or more individual District Boards, each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District. (19) ALL DISTRICTS 0 e�i r s�iness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any: (a) Report of the General Counsel and consideration of motion to receive and file General Counsel' s Memoranda dated June 5, 1990 and June 13, 1990 (See attached Memoranda) . (b) Roll call vote authorizing consideration of items (c) and (d) listed below which arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda and which require action at this time. (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint to Foreclose Stop Notice and Against Payment Bond, Laborers' Health and Welfare Fund for Southern California, at al. vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, at al. , Orange County Municipal Court-West Judicial District Case No. 162600, relative to a previous Stop Notice filed in connection with Warehouse and Maintenance Building and Oil Storage and Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20; and authorize the Districts' General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. (d) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint for Enforcement of Public Work Stop Notices; Enforcement of Public Work Payment Bond, and Amendments to said Complaint, The Burke Company vs. DSP Constructors, Inc. , at al. , Orange County Superior Court Case No. 625326, relative to a previous Stop Notice filed in connection with Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4; anel authorize the Districts' General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. \/ -2- REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN u JUNE 13, 1990 1) SCAQMD AWARD I 'M PLEASED TO INFORM YOU THAT THE SANITATION DISTRICTS WERE RECENTLY NAMED BY THE SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT TO RECEIVE A CLEAN AIR AWARD FOR OUR EFFORTS IN THE CATEGORY OF MODEL COMMUNITY ACHIEVEMENTS. A BOOKLET DESCRIBING THE AWARD ALONG WITH OTHERS GIVEN THIS YEAR IS INCLUDED IN YOUR FOLDER TONIGHT. PRESENTATION AND/OR ASK HANK WEDAA (THE ORANGE COUNTY LEAGUE OF CITIES REPRESENTATIVE ON THE SCAQMD BOARD AND THE VICE CHAIRMAN) IF HE WOULD LIKE TO SAY SOMETHING ABOUT THE AWARD. 2) UPCOMING MEETINGS A. FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY, as JUNE 20TH, AT 5:30 P.M. B. DISTRICTS 3 & 11 SELECTION COMMITTEE - DISTRICTS 3 AND 11 SELECTION COMMITTEE ARE SCHEDULED TO MEET ON THURSDAY, JUNE 21ST, AT 5:30 P.M. u - ITEM 2 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE - -1- I . C. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 27TH, AT 5:30 P.M. (INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS TO ATTEND: ) LESLIE PONTIOUS AND CHARLES PUCKETT - OR - (SALLY ANNE SHERIDAN) - OR - (BOB SIEFEN) D. CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE - THE CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON THURSDAY, JUNE 28TH, AT 5: 30 P.M. - END OF REPORT - -2- MEETING DATE June 13, 1990 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7, 11 , 13 6 14 DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS u(s �15 (WWt) (b)LM) (CRANK)........WAHNER...... (AGE)............. .......ARNOLD......�/—Y —v (EDGAR)........PUCKETT.....�G _ _ (GREEN)........... .......BANNISTEH..._LG 1 7 (YOUNG)........GRISET......�G (WEDAA)...... ..... .......BIGOASER.... — — (ROTH).........STANTON..... (NORBY)...... ............CATLIN...... L Y (PLUMMER)................COX......... 1_ �l DISTRICT 2 (MAIN)...................CULVER...... ✓ V Y (PL''K=TT)................EDGAR....... ✓ Y (HUNTER).......PICKLER.....y _ _ IMAH.:.. ')................GRAHAM......,[ L Y (SCOTT)........NEAL........ (CHES^_N)................GRIFFIN..... ✓�'_ Y (WEDAA)........GiGGNCGA....1G _ _ (Ya-'G)..................GRISET...... . V Y (NORBY)........CATL.N......1�_ _ (PLUMMER)................HART... ... . ✓ y Y (YOUNG)........GRISET...... ., (GRAHAM).................MAHONEY:... . ✓ Y_ Y (GRAHAM).......MAHONEY..... . ,_ _ (CULVER).................MAIN........ Y (CULVER).......MAIN........�G_ _ (SILVA)..................MAYS........_ 6- (WEDIN)........NELSON...... _ _ (SCOTT)............. NEALON....... I Y (ECKENRODE)....NEWTON...... (WEDIN)... ......... .....NELS jl� q— (SALDARINI)....SILZEL...... _ _ (ECKENRODEI..............NEWTON...... Y v (BARRERA)......SMITH....... (HUNTER).................PICKLER..... _I— Y (ROTH).........STANTON.....�C (HART)...................PLUMMER..... I Y (MINER)..................POLIS....... Y Y DISTRICT 3 (EDGAR)..................PONTIOUS...._1G _y_ Y (EDGAR)..................PUCKETT..... V V (MINER)........POL (STANTON)................ROTH........ . _V Y (WILES) .. SIEFEN...... (COX)....................SANSONE.....JC Y _ _ Y (AGE)..........ARNOLD...... AGRAN)..................SHERIDAN..... Y (GREEN)........BANNISTER... (WILES)..................SIEFEN...... 6L , (NORBY CATLIN... (SALDARINI)..............SILZ EL...... ✓ Y (MAIN).........CULVER...... 1G _ _ (BARRERA)................SMITH....... Q, (MAHONEY)......GRAHAM...... (ROTH)...................STANTON..... ✓ y (CHESSEN)......GRIFFIN..... _ _ (MILLER).................SWAN........_K Y (YOUNG)........GRISET......�C (NAMLSTROM)..............SYLVIA......�C Y (SCOTT)........NEAL........ ✓ (ALLEN)................. ...... . ......._!G Y (WEDIN)........NELSON......_ (CRANK/FERRYMAN/GREEN)...WAHNER......y/J_ Y (HUNTER).......PICKLER.....yG (BIGONGER)........ .......NEDRA...... . Y Y (ROTH).........STANTON...... (NELSON).................WEDIN......._ (WAHLSTROM)....SYLVIA...... . (LASZLO).................WILSON...... ✓ Y Y (ALLEN)........VEIiYYGY....JG _ (GREEN)..................WINCHELL....,� V Y (LASZLO).......WILSON......_. DISTRICT 5 (PLUMMER)......HART........�G (COX)..........SANSONE..... STAFF: (STANTON)......ROTH........_. SYLVESTER... ✓ BROWN....... DISTRICT 6 ANDERSON.... , CLAWSON..... , (HART).........PLUMMER..... DAWES........ (FERRYMAN).....WAHNER......J�_ HODGES...... (STANTON)......ROTH........�C_ KYLE........ LINDER......�� DISTRICT 7 NELSON...... NICHOLS..... ✓ (BARRERA)......SMITH....... 0- OOTEN....... (PUCKETT)......EDGAR.......�G _ _ STREED......� (PLUMMER)......COX.........�C _ _ VINCENT..... (YOUNG)........GRISET......JC_ VON LANGEN _ (STANTON)......ROTH........� WINSOR......_ (AGRAN)........SHERIDAN....JG Q,�.yA.wa..RAMGdCu- (GREEN)........WAHNER......_ OTHERS: WOODRUFF....ML DISTRICT 11 IDE......... ANWAR....... (GREEN)........WINCHELL.... DEMIR......._ (SILVA)........MAYS........ — FLEMING....._ (ROTH).........STANTON..... HOHENER....._ HOUGH....... DISTRICT 13 HOWARO......= HUNT........ . (BIGONGER).....WEDAA....... ✓ KNOPF........77 (NELSON).......WEDIN........ LINDSTROM..._ (HUNTER).......PICKLER..... ✓_ LYNCH......._ (STANTON)......RITH........ STONE......._ (BARRERA)......SMITH....... _ WASON......._ YOUNG....... DISTRICT 14 � Bse� (MILLER).......SWAN........ (AGRAN)........SHERIDAN....J� EYWMTRenAR.c (EDGAR)........PONTIOUS...._�� (STANTON)......ROTH........ ✓ _ (BARRERA)......SMITH........a, 06/13/90 PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY JUNE 13, 1990 BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION FIRM Please Print Please Print OC C /Pi1ZG�ti�� ii< I °'VTGo E'ey F31 6-13-90 JOINT MEETING NOTES �..i #4 - Receive 8 file minute excerpts Director Edgar introduced new Director Leslie Pontious from Tustin who was absent at the last meeting. #6(a) - Report of the Joint Chairman SEE ATTACHED REPORT. RE SCAQMD award, Hank Wedaa addressed the Board. He noted that he had sat on the Sanitation Districts' Board since 1971 and had seen a lot of positive things happen. The law says we should do certain things and we think we should do certain other things. Said his overall impression of the Districts is exceedingly positive and he is very proud of the Districts. As a Director at SCAQMD, he found that they were throwing rocks at a lot of people, but then they established Clean Air Awards last year and agin this year. He added that some time ago he came to the General Manager and said he thought the Sanitation Districts should put together a package to apply for a Clean Air Award. They only gave out 10 or 12 this year. He worked with the Districts a little but they did most everything in preparing their application. Out of 65 submittals, the Sanitation Districts won one of two Model Community Achievement awards. Called the Directors' attention to the SCAQMD brochure included in their folders. He advised that this award was presented to the Joint Chairman and General Manager at an awards dinner but wanted to present it again before the Boards. He then read his presentation wording from the awards dinner (See attached). Following the presentation of the trophy, Joint Chairman Catlin commented that this program took leadership and innovation and it was voluntary on the part of the Sanitation Districts. The leadership is from the Directors and staff, and we accept the award with pride. Director Wedaa said there would be other awards next year and hoped Directors would come to him with names of companies or agencies they would recommend for awards. #6(b) - Report of the General Manager The General Manager briefly commented on the budget process for the benefit of new Directors. Later, under agenda item #15 Directors will be considering the Joint Works budgets for 1990-91. These budgets fund the construction and operation of the treatment plants and administrative activities of the joint Districts. The budgets have been developed over the past four months with the Boards' Fiscal Policy Committee and reviewed with the Executive Committee last month. If they are approved tonight, then the next step is that staff will Incorporate these Joint Works items into the individual budgets of each District that will come before the Executive Committee later this month, and then before each District in July. The nine District budgets will then constitute the official budgets of the individual Districts filed with the County Auditor in August of this year. A6(c) - Report of the General Counsel The General Counsel commented that the tan sheet in the District 2 Directors' folders was just an informational relative to a claim and litigation involving Southern California Gas Company in connection with the construction of the Taft Interceptor, Contract No. 2-6-2. He then noted that there were two supplemental items for the Directors to consider relative to a couple Summons and Complaints on Stop Notices previously filed. These are routine and won't really cost the Districts anything. Will be considered under agenda item #19. R9 - ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR (b) - Removed by Director Culver. He asked TMD about this change order to Job No. J-7-4. Tam Dawes replied that there were four items that were changed. This has been a problem project for the Sanitation Districts. Many of the changes that we are experiencing are the result of what he would consider a poor set of designs. We have had to make the changes to comply with the requirements of the City and the needs of the District. We have talked with the General Counsel about following up with a possible action against architect, but for now, would recommend approval of this change order since these items are needed for the completion of the building. Director Culver said he and a number of Directors were under the impression that normally the architect would have this information before submitting for approval and permit from the City of Fountain Valley. The architect should be liable for this. Tam Dawes added that part of the difficulty with this project is that we didn't get a lot of support from the architect. Did receive City of Fountain Valley permits before work began but there have been changing requirements by the City and fire sprinklers were required to be added because there are other new buildings such as the lab and operations and maintenance building. The City Fire Marshall wanted them all tied in. Culver said, we agree, but if we submitted our plans, can't understand why the City of Fountain Valley made this change. TMD replied that they feel it is absolutely necessary. Polis commented that there was a gross oversight in the plans when we have to come back to change the heating system to add heat to Conference Room A. Would like to see all payments stopped to architect or place a legal action against them. Tom Dawes advised we have stopped payments to architect. Pickier commented that he imagined this action would have to go through our attorney. It was then MOVED to approve this Change Order No. 17 and then go ahead and see if we can get these funds back. Motion SECONDED. VOICE VOTE. MOTION CARRIED. (n) - Removed by Supervisor Roth. The General Manager reported that recently we have had considerable turnover in our Operations Department. We have been trying to recruit for some of these positions. Have filled one. Had several Interviews for the second one. Offered the position to two people. First one turned it down. Second one comes to us with considerable experience in treatment field. The staff has authority to employ up to mid-point of a salary -2- range which is below what applicant now makes for the City of LA. Are asking for authority to employ him at the top step of that salary range. It was then MOVED, SECONDED & DULY CARRIED to approve item (n). (o) - Removed by Supervisor Roth. The General Manager explained that the Boards have adopted separate policies for reimbursement to staff and Directors for travel expenses. This is an annual authority placed on the June agenda each year that basically authorizes the General Manager to send staff and Directors to meetings that are deemed appropriate in conjunction with the other two policies and in accordance with the budget. Roth inquired about the cost of the meetings. Mr. Sylvester advised that the Travel & Training budget is $175,000 out of a total budget of $5,000,000. It was then MOVED & SECONDED to approve item (o). MOTION CARRIED. #11 - Nominations for Joint Chairman Director Griffin nominated Buck Catlin for Joint Chairman. Director Edgar noted that nominations were to remain open until the July Board Meeting. #14 - Report of Conservation. Reclamation and Reuse Committee Director Wedaa referred to the package mailed with agenda material . He said the Committee met last month and commented on their proposed types of activities. He said so far they have gone through items 1, 2 and 4 on the list. #15(b) (6) - Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for foul air treatment optimization study Supervisors Roth and Stanton stated their opposition to the motion. Director Siefen asked why they opposed the motion. Roth explained that he has a problem spending $85,000 to interpret the rules of AQMD. We should send the rules back and ask them to interpret rather than pass this cost on to our ratepayers. I object to this and think the responsibility to interpret rules should be with the rulemaker. It was then MOVED and SECONDED to approve Resolution No. 90-58. Director Winchell spoke in favor of the motion and added that this agreement is not solely for clarification of the rules. It is to find out the best use of our own technology. We will be remaking the rule and setting the standards ourselves. From this study we will be in control . VOICE VOTE. Directors Roth, Stanton, Bannister & Polis voted no. MOTION CARRIED. #19(a) - Report of General Counsel re supplemental agenda items The General Counsel reported that the Districts received two lawsuits where we were named with the general contractor on two of our construction projects. These are in connection with Stop Notices previously filed with the Districts. He noted that we almost always get concurrence that we don't have to actively participate in the lawsuit. If we advise that they will have to pay our General Counsel ' s fees if we participate, they generally say to do nothing. Item (b) , (c) & (d) were MOVED, SECONDED AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. -3- R34 - DISTRICTS 3 8 11 re JCE Agreement for design of Contract 11-17 The General Manager reported that last July when the joint Master Plan was adopted, the Boards also discussed the Master Plan for Districts 3 and 11. He said this is a follow-up tonight. Tom Dawes then reported that the issue they discussed last month was construction of new sewage facilities to serve the northwest portion of the City of Huntington Beach. The Slater Pump Station has to be upgraded. The Project Report for this project was completed last month. The issue that evening was to bring District 3 into the negotiations for design of the Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements. The Districts have been negotiating with Signal Bolsa for three years relative to annexation charges that would bring them into the District. The Slater Pump Station would have been designed to serve them (5,000 homes), but we have sent two registered letters to them and they haven't responded. Director Bannister commented in the last two or three days there has been some disclosures that Signal may be taken over by Kohl. TMD said we had read the articles also and intend to talk to Kohl . He added that staff hoped to bring a design contract to the Board by the July meeting. Will meet with Kohl prior to that. He said he suspected that this change is why Signal had backed out on their previous commitment to the District. If they do not annex, Tom said staff would recommend that the pump station not be enlarged to serve them. They could bring lines to the Coast Trunk and be served that way. It would cost them $10 million over and above what it would cost to go into the Slater Pump Station system though. Director Pickier asked what our alternatives were? TMD replied that we would build a somewhat smaller pump station then. Would put in four pumps instead of five. Would save about 10% on the pump station but there are some big savings for District 11 by not having them. There is a line that can be eliminated in the discharge system which would be a $2 million pipe. Culver asked what the participation percentage was between Districts 3 and 11? TMD replied 88.5% for District 11 and 17% for District 3 (doesn't add up ???). He asked when the final decision had to be made? Ton said we would like to have in July but could hold off 30 days. Pickier commented that he thought Kohl should be brought into the picture. Tom agreed, we will do that. Pickier then asked what the cost of the five pumps were versus four pumps? TMD advised $7.6 million versus $7 million, less than 10% change. Pickier asked, wouldn't it still be wise then to go ahead with the five pumps? Tom said we would recommend against that. That difference may seem small, but to District 11 it is huge. Polis asked, what is the possibility of increasing it later then; making it convertible? TMD replied it could be done, but the pump station would be a little less effecient. It would take more energy. We do have adequate capacity in the Coast Trunk. It would just be a bigger expense to Kohl. Director Main asked, is the $2 million discharge line included in the $7.6 million? TMD said, no, that is a future line. Pickier commented that it seemed like it may be up to District 11. -4- The General Manager stated that the Directors need to keep in mind that if they decide to build capacity in the pump station without a decision by the property owners whether they are going to come in, you will be spending money out of your own pockets that may never be paid back. That decision is down the line in July or August. Pickler asked if that additional capacity would never be used? Tom advised that our 30-year Master Plan tells us it is never going to be needed. Griffin commented, whatever the decision is here, should allow staff to proceed ahead with engineer. TMD advised that tonight's decision would authorize District 3 to be brought into the negotiations for design of the contract. Griffin suggested that maybe they could look at the critical path timeframe at the next Board meeting. Pickler added that maybe the City of Huntington Beach can pressure them (Kohl) to be sure we get an answer by the next month. -5- REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN JUNE 13, 1990 1) SCAOMD AWARD I 'M PLEASED TO INFORM YOU THAT THE SANITATION DISTRICTS WERE RECENTLY NAMED BY THE SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT TO RECEIVE A CLEAN AIR AWARD FOR OUR EFFORTS IN THE CATEGORY OF MODEL COMMUNITY ACHIEVEMENTS. A BOOKLET DESCRIBING THE AWARD 'ALONG WITH OTHERS GIVEN THIS YEAR IS INCLUDED IN YOUR FOLDER TONIGHT. PRESENTATION AND/OR ASK HANK WEDAA (THE ORANGE COUNTY LEAGUE OF CITIES REPRESENTATIVE ON THE SCAQMD BOARD AND THE VICE CHAIRMAN) IF HE WOULD LIKE TO SAY SOMETHING ABOUT THE AWARD. 2) UPCOMING MEETINGS eRw Ja A. FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY , (o JUNE 20TH, AT 5:30 P.M. B. DISTRICTS 3 d 11 SELECTION COMMITTEE - DISTRICTS 3 AND 11 SELECTION COMMITTEE ARE SCHEDULED TO MEET ON THURSDAY, JUNE 21ST, AT 5:30 P.M. ITEM 2 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE - -1- C. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY. JUNE 27TH, AT 5:30 P.M. ( INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS TO ATTEND: ) ESLIE PONTIO CHARLES PUCKET - OR - (SALLY ANNE SHERIDAN) - OR - (BOB SIEFEN) D. CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE - THE CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION AND REUSE COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON THURSDAY, JUNE 28TH, AT 5:30 P.M. v - END OF REPORT - -2- Hank Wedaa Model Community Achievements - County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Now we've reached the important category of Model Community Achievements. Our two awardees were selected for notable efforts that result in healthier air for all of us to breathe. It's with great pride that I call your attention to the accomplishments of the COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY. In 1984,the Districts began installing launder valves in Orange County sewage handling facilities, reducing hydrogen sulfide emissions by 48%. The Districts are now constructing power facilities at treatment plants to generate on-site electrical power from digester gas by 1992. This innovation alone will reduce NOX and CO2 emissions by 57%. In addition, the Districts' embarked on an air toxics study unparalleled in the waste water field. The Sanitation Districts of Orange County have also been a driving force and leader in establishing conformity review procedures to be used throughout the industry. It is with great pleasure that I present them with this Clean Air Award. Buck Catlin, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Wayne Sylvester, Executive Director, will now accept for the Sanitation Districts. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 3, 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON JUNE 139 1990 PNITAT10* o w9 g a ORq 'GE CO t+` ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLia AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA `.r ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on June 13, 1990. at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2. 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: �✓ ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: x James A. Wanner, Chairman Orma Crank a Charles E. Puckett, Chairman pro tam —Richard S. Edgar a Dan Grlset —Dan Young x Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 2: x Iry Pickler, Chairman Fred Hunter a James Neal, Chairman pro in —George Scott Roland E. 31gonger 7--Henry W. Wedaa a A.B. '-Buck" Catlin Chris Harty a Dan Griset —_Dan Young ---Willi am 0. Mahoney _Bath Graham x Robert H. Main Norman Culver a Carrey Nelson _Wayne Wedin a Arthur G. Newton _Norman Z. Eckenrode z Wayne Silzel _Harold Saldarini a Don E. Smith Fred Barrera x Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 3: x Richard Polls, Chairman _Eva G. Miner a J.R. -Bob- Siefen, Chairman pro tam _Dewey Wiles a Margaret M. Arnold _Cecilia L. Age a Wes Bannister Peter Green z A.B. -Buck- Catlin —Chris Herby x Norman Culver —_Robert H. Main a Beth Graham _William 0. Mahoney a Don R. Griffin _Donna L. Chessen =Dan Griset Dan Young a James Neal __George Scott a Carrey Nelson _Wayne Wedin alry Pickler _Fred Hunter a Roger Stanton Don R. Roth a Charles Sylvia —Robert Wahlstrom —Paul Verellen a Edward L. Allen x Edna Wilson Frank Laszlo DISTRICT NO. 5: x Evelyn Hart, Chairman —John Plummer a Phil Sansone, Chairman pro tan John C. Cox, Jr. x Don R. Rath _Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 6: x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chai man _Evelyn Hart a James Wanner, Chai man pro tam James M. Ferryman a Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 7: a Don E. Smith, Chairman _Fred Barrera a Richard Edgar, Chairman pro tam _Charles E. Puckett a John C. Cox, Jr. —Dan Plunmer a Dan Grlset Dan Young a Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton a Sally Anne Sheridan Larry Agran a James Wanner _Harry Green DISTRICT NO. 11: x Grace Winchell, Chairman _Peter Green a Tom Nays, Chairman pro tam Jim Silva a Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 13: x Henry W. Medea, Chairman _Roland E. Bigonger a Wayne Wedin, Chairman xo tan _Carrey Nelson a Iry Pickler Fred Hunter x Don R. Roth —Roger Stanton a Don E. Smith Fred Barrera DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chairman Darryl Miller a Sally Anne Sheridan, Chairman pro tam _Larry Agran 7—Leslie A. Pontious Richard B. Edgar a Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton =Don E. Smith Fred Barrera -2- O6/13/90 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Rita J. Brown, Board Secretary, Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Corinne Clawson, Ed Hodges, Penny Kyle, John Linder, Charles Nichols, Adriana Renescu OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel , Clark Ide, Walt Howard, Bill Knopf, James Demir, Phil Stone, Tom Richardson, Bernard Maniscalco * Y Y * * Y # Y * Y Y * * DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file minute excer from the City of Seal Beach re That the minute excerpt from the City . Board appointments of Seal Beach re election of mayor and appointment of alternate Director and seating a new member of the Board, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows: (*Mayor) District Active Director Alternate Director 3 Edna Wilson* Frank Laszlo ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman recognized Presentation of CAQMD 199U ClFa_n Director/District 13 Chairman Henry Air Award to UESD Wedaa, who is also a member of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Board and is currently its Vice Chairman. Mr. Wedaa commented that he had been associated with the Sanitation Districts for many years and that he was very proud of their accomplishments and their positive approach to environmental management. Representing the SCAQMD, he then briefly explained their Clean Air Awards program which was first instituted in 1989. This year awards were given in five categories. The Orange County Sanitation Districts' application was one of 65 in the category of Model Community Achievements which recognizes exceptional efforts in promoting good air quality. He noted that the Sanitation Districts were the recipients of one of only two awards given in this category for 1990. Director Wedaa further reported on the accomplishments of the Districts which resulted in achieving this Clean Air Award. In 1984 the Districts began installing launder valves in Orange County sewage handling facilities, reducing hydrogen sulfide emissions by 48%. The Districts are currently constructing power facilities at treatment plants to generate on-site electrical power from digester gas by 1992. This innovation alone will reduce NOx and CO2 emissions by 57%. In addition, the Districts embarked on an air toxics study unparalleled in the wastewater field. The Sanitation Districts of Orange Countv have also been a driving force and leader in establishing conformity review procedures to be used throughout the industry. -3- 06/13/90 Mr. Wedaa then presented the 1990 Clean Air Award to the Joint Chairman, Buck Catlin, and General Manager, Wayne Sylvester. Joint Chairman Catlin accepted the award on behalf of the Districts and expressed appreciation for this recognition. He noted that the Districts voluntarily instituted these air quality programs, and remarked that he was proud of the innovative leadership of the Directors and staff. ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Catlin reported that Report of the Joint Chairman the Fiscal Policy Committee was tentatively scheduled to meet on Wednesday, June 20th, at 5:30 p.m. (This meeting was subsequently changed to Friday, June 22nd, at 4:00 p.m.) He also noted that the Selection Committee for Districts 3 and 11 was scheduled to meet on Thursday, June 21st, at 5:30 p.m. Chairman Catiin then called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, June 27th, at 5:30 p.m. , and invited Directors Leslie Pontious and Charles Puckett to attend and participate in the discussions. The Joint Chairman also advised that the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee was scheduled to meet on Thursday, June 28th, at 5:30 p.m. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager commented briefly Report of the General Manager on the annual budget process for the benefit of new Directors. He explained that later in the agenda they would be asked to consider the Joint Works budgets for 1990-91. These budgets fund the construction and operation of the treatment plants and administrative activities of the joint Districts. They have been developed over the past four months with the Boards' Fiscal Policy Committee, and reviewed with the Executive Committee last month. Mr. Sylvester advised that if they are approved that evening, the staff will then incorporate these Joint Works items into the individual budgets of each District to be reviewed by the Executive Committee later in the month. Each District will considerits individual budget for 1990-91 at the July Board meeting. The nine District budgets will then constitute the official budgets of the Districts filed with the County Auditor in August of this year. ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel briefly commented Report of the General Counsel on the report included in the Directors' meeting folders on the status of litigation against Southern California Gas Company for recovery of additional costs incurred by District No. 2 as a result of undisclosed Gas Company utilities encountered during construction of the Taft Interceptor, Contract No. 2-6-2. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 9, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 9, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -4- Vol aai av DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 9, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 9, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 9, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or Aooroval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 9, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 9, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes Of the regular meeting held May 9, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 9, 1990, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint antl Lnalvlaual District (;lalms That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 5/09/90 5123/90 ALL DISTRICTS JTbperating Fund - $ 399,974.42 $1,014,210.78 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 9,572,462.48 2,496,520.54 Joint Working Capital Fund - 384,149.04 179,126.23 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 12,417.85 119,862.03 DISTRICT NO. 1 - -0- 343.00 DISTRICT NO.2 - 628,461.28 1,269,102.58 DI TRI�CT=N - 16,975.22 73,910.10 ' DISTR�TTr_3 - 823,807.34 61,196.75 DI N - 1,175.25 257.21 _ DfSTUC H� - 398,653.76 382,589.43 I RI 1 _ 4 369_07 8, 38. D .00 DI TR T - 451,350.10 6,290.41 TD�R Cf—NQS_._5 a 6 JOINT - 66,689.26 2,167.64 DISTRICTS N N - 2,045.60 -a- DISTRICTS NOS. 7 8 NT - 9.14 769.40 TIT_ 7 5T, 1 5.61T 44.53 -5- 06/13/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase o One 1 inductively ou led Plasma Emission That the bid tabulation and ectrometer, ec f cat on recommendation re award of Purchase `..� No. E-190, to Leco Corporation of One (1) Inductively Coupled Plasma Emission Spectrometer, Specification No. E-190, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the bid of Leeman Labs, Inc. be, and is hereby, rejected as it does not meet the specifications; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Leto Corporation for the delivered price of $122,000.00 plus sales tax for Alternate Bid Item B. ALL DISTRICTS In response to an inquiry relative to A rovin ham a rder No. 7 to Change Order No. 17 to Job No. J-7-4, the p ans and specifications for the Director of Engineering reported Jab No. J-7-4 that these changes are for corrections to the plans which should have been included in the original design. He noted that although the project was issued building permits, the Districts have encountered considerable difficulty with the architectural design of this project. Mr. Dawes indicated that staff and General Counsel are now reviewing appropriate measures to resolve the issues. Changes to the fire alarm system and sprinkling system required by the City of Fountain Valley Fire Marshall were also discussed. The Board members entered into a discussion concerning the architect' s responsibilities and liability, and appropriate actions that should be taken. The Boards' Building Committee has held one meeting on this matter and will be meeting again in the near future to further review it. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 17 to the plans and specifications for Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4, authorizing an addition of $21,626.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for four items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That following further review and analysis of the matter, the General Counsel and staff report back to the Directors on the issue. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 1 to the plans Job No. J-17 and specifications for Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17, authorizing a net addition of $22,378.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for five items of additional work or deletions, and granting a time extension of seven calendar days for completion of said changes, be, and is hereby, approved. r► -6- 06/13/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the electrical equipment purchase That Change Order No. 1 to the contract with doper Industries, electrical equipment purchase Job No. J-19A contract with Cooper Industries, Energy Services Group, dba C-B Reciprocating, for Purchase of Spark-Ignited Engines for Use in Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19A, authorizing an additional $10,000.00 to upgrade all eight engines with new computer controls, increasing the contract amount from $20,658,245.00 to an amount not to exceed $20,668,245.00; extending the date for delivery of the heat recovery equipment from June 30, 1990 to September 1, 1990; and extending the date for delivery of spare parts from June 4, 1990 to August 1, 1990, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Aooroving Cham e r r o. o the _ lans an s ecificateions for That Change Order No. 5 to the plans Jab NO. J-20 and specifications for Warehouse and Maintenance Building and oil Storage and Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20, authorizing a net addition of $16,528.34 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for six items of additional work or deletions, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order That staff be, and is hereby, No. 37965 issued to Sur-Lite authorized to issue Change Order Corporation re Job NO. J- 1A No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 37965 issued to Sur-Lite Corporation for Purchase of Five Waste Digester Gas Flares, Job No. J-21A, decreasing the number of waste gas flares purchased from five to four, and the total authorized amount from $284,216.00 to $239,400.00, plus sales tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 29 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 29 to the plans Job Nos. PI-ZU and PS- 1 and specifications for Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-20, and Demolition of Digesters Nos. 1, 2 and 4; Replacement of Boiler; Piping Cieanouts; and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-31, authorizing an addition of $130,821.95 to the contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. for 13 Items of miscellaneous modifications and additions, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: vi Approng Change rder No. 1 to e laps and s ecifications for That Change Order No. 1 to the plans Job NO. PI- 4-2 and specifications for Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-2, authorizing an addition of $104,883.45 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. , for one item of additional work to accommodate Southern California Edison Company and City of Huntington Beach improvements, be, and is hereby, approved. -7- �✓ 06/13/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: pproying Change Order No. 2 to the tans and s ecifications for That Change Order No. 2 to the plans Job No. Pl-J4-Z and specification for Sludge Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-2, authorizing an addition of $132,628.20 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. , for one item of additional work for compatibility with new Central Power Generation Systems project, be, and 1s hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Anoroy ng Change Order No. 8 to the fans and s ecifications for That Change Order No. 8 to the plans Job No. P2- 7 and specifications for Miscellaneous Modifications and Improvements to Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-37, authorizing an addition of $29,190.00 to the contract with Ziebarth & Alper for ten items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the election ommittee to ne otiate Addendum No. 3 to the That the Selection Committee be, and Pro essional Services Agreement is hereby, authorized to negotiate with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers Addendum No. 3 to the Professional for desi n and construction services Services Agreement with Lee and Ro re o o. Consulting Engineers for design and construction services required for Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-33, to provide for additional construction support services. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: AppraVing Professional erV ces A reement with James M. Montgomery That the Selection Committee Consulting Engineers, Inc. to certification of the final negotiated conduct a study of user categories fee relative to the'Professional for establishing rates for Services Agreement with Districts' one-time connection fees James M. Montgomery Consulting and annual use fees Engineers, Inc. to conduct a study of user categories for establishing rates for Districts' one-time connection fees and annual use fees, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adapt Resolution No. 90-54, approving said agreement with James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers, Inc. for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus - overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $89,549.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -8- 06/13/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving en um No. 1 to the Profess ono Services A reemen That the Selection Committee wit Mar n ordic r. for certification of the final negotiated specialized construction inspection fee relative to Addendum No. 1 to the services re various master-planned Professional Services Agreement with construction projects Martin Kordick, Sr. for specialized construction inspection services re various master-planned construction projects, providing for extension of said agreement and increasing the hourly rate, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-55, approving said Addendum No. 1 with Martin Kordick, Sr. , extending said agreement for construction inspection services, on an as-needed basis, for a two-year period beginning August 10, 1990, at the increased hourly rate of $40.00 for the first year and $42.50 for the second year, plus _ mileage reimbursement for on-the-job travel. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: e v ece f e n claim of anue 'oan de That the claim of Emmanuel Ojo dated April 30, 1990, in the amount of $553.32 for alleged damage to his vehicle while parked on the perimeter road next to the Santa Ana River at Plant No. 1, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the Districts' General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that Authorizing the General Manager to recently the Operations Division has employ Dr. Y. J. hao in the experienced a considerable turnover classification of Senior En ineer of senior engineering staff and has at the salary of 53 month been recruiting to fill several positions. The field of applicants was narrowed to two for a Senior Engineer position. The first one declined the position and the second one, Dr. Shao, comes highly qualified by virtue of his schooling and 23 years of experience, 12 of which are in the wastewater treatment field. Mr. Sylvester explained that he is currently making more than staff is authorized to offer, which is the mid-point of the salary range. He explained that staff is requesting authority to employ Dr. Shao at the top step of the salary range for the classification of Senior Engineer. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to employ Dr. Y. J. Shao in the classification of Senior Engineer, at the salary or $5377/month, to work in the Districts' Operations Division. -9- �.✓ 06/13/90 ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager explained that Authorizing the General Manager to the Boards have previously adopted desi nate members of the Boards separate policies for Directors and antl or staff to attend and partici- staff for reimbursement of travel and ate in mee in s, hearin s meeting expenses. Annually an item conferences, facility inspect ons is placed on the agenda to authorize and other functions him to designate members of the Boards and/or staff to attend m regulatory proceedings and other similar functions. Such attendance is in accordance with the Districts' adopted policies for travel and expense reimbursement and the approved annual budget. He noted that the gross annual Joint Operating budget for 1990-91 of approximately $50 million includes a travel and meeting allowance of $175,000. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to designate members of the Boards and/or staff to attend and participate in meetings, hearings, conferences facility inspections and other functions which, in his opinion, will be of value to the Districts or affect the Districts' interests, including, but not limited to, those conducted by state and federal legislative and regulatory bodies and the California Association of Sanitation Agencies, California Water Pollution Control Association, Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, and the Water Pollution Control Federation; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reimbursement for travel , meals, lodging and incidental expenses be, and is hereby, authorized in accordance with existing Districts' policies and the approved annual budget for 1990-91. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Annual nomination for Chairman of the Joint Administrative The General Counsel briefly reviewed rganization - the provisions of the Districts' Rules of Procedure relating to nomination and election of the Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman. This being the annual meeting fixed by the Boards at which nominations are to be made for the office of Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization, the Secretary then declared the nominations open. Director A. B. "Buck" Catlin was nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. It was pointed out that nominations would remain open until the regular July Board meeting. The Secretary then reported that the election would be held at said July meeting in accordance with the Boards' Rules of Procedures for the Conduct of Business of the Districts. Nominations and election of a Vice Joint Chairman will also be held at the regular July meeting. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve staff Summary Financial Report for nine- That the staff Summary Financial month period ending March 31, 1990 Report for nine-month period ending March 31, 1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. -10- 06/13/90 ALL DISTRICTS Actions re NPDES Ocean Monitoring Program Receive, file and approve Report Moved, seconded and duly carried: �.✓ and ecommendatian for N cean Monitorinq Pro ram Year Six That the Report and Recommendation 1990-91 and Selection LOnInIttee for NPDES Ocean Monitoring Program Certification re Amendment No. 7 Year Six (1990-91) and Selection to A reement wi re Committee certification of the pecif cat on No. negotiated fee for Amendment No. 7 to Agreement with Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall , Specification No. S-032, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. A gravin Amendment No. 7 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: - reemen w h A re Specification No. S-032 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-56, approving Amendment No. 7 to the Agreement with SAIC for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-Inch Ocean Outfall , Specification No. S-032, extending the contract from July 1, 1990 to June 30, 1991, for an amount not to exceed $1,821,365.00 for the sixth year of said contract. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive Pile and a rove wr ten re or 0 t e Conser% on That the written report of the Reclamation and Reuse Committee Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee's meeting on May 31, 1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizino the General Mana er an eneral Counse o negotiate wi That the General Manager and General property owners for acquisition or Counsel be, and are hereby, sites Tor water reclamation authorized to negotiate with property facility in vicinity of Anaheim owners for acquisition of a site or orebay sites for a water reclamation facility in the general vicinity of the Anaheim Forebay based upon appraisals for such property. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: ece ve file and a rave written report of the xecutive omm tee That the written report of the Joint and Fiscal Policy Committee meeting of the Executive Committee and _ the Fiscal Policy Committee held on May 23, 1990, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: ece ve and fie Report of the xecuut ve CTomnittee and Fiscal That the report and recommendations of P0' c It r� 1 the Executive Committee and Fiscal personne requ rements and joint Policy Committee re 1990-91 personnel wars budgets requirements and Joint works operating and construction budgets, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. -11- 06/13/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving 1990-91 personnel requirements and amending That the 1990-91 personnel Classification and compensation requirements be, and are hereby, Resolution No. 79- 0, as amended approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereb ado t Resolution No. 90-57, amending -Classification an ompensa ion eso u ion No. 79-20, as amended, re 1990-91 personnel requirements. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried by Approving the 1 - 1 Joint the following roll call vote: Operating Budget AYES: Edward L. Allen, Margaret M. Arnold, Wes Bannister, A. B. "Buck" Catlin, John C. Cox, Jr. , Norman E. Culver, Richard B. Edgar, Beth Graham, Don R. Griffin, Dan Griset, Evelyn Hart, William D. Mahoney, Robert H. Main, James Neal , Arthur G. Newton, Iry Pickler, Ruthelyn Plummer, Richard T. Polis, Leslie A. Pontious, Charles E. Puckett, Dan R. Roth, Sally Anne Sheridan, Wayne Silzel , Roger R. Stanton, Peer A. Swan, Charles E. Sylvia, James A. Wahner, Henry W. Wedaa, Edna Wilson, Grace H. Winchell NOES: None ABSENT: Tom Mays, Carrey J. Nelson, J. R. "Bob" Siefen, Don E. Smith, Wayne D. Wedin That the proposed 1990-91 Joint Operating Budget Funds of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 for the 1990-91 fiscal year, be, and are hereby, approved and adopted as follows: Fund Total Amount Joint Operating/Working Capital $50,2079000 Workers' Compensation Self-Insured 218,000 Self-Funded Health Plan Trust 1,264,000 Public Liability Self-Insured 329,000 �./ -12- O6/13/90 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried by A rovin the 1 - 1 Capital the following roll call vote: Outlay Revolving un Budget AYES: Edward L. Allen, Margaret M. Arnold, Wes Bannister, A. B. "Buck" Catlin, John C. Cox, Jr. , Norman E. Culver, Richard B. Edgar, Beth Graham, Don R. Griffin, Dan Griset, Evelyn Hart, William D. Mahoney, Robert H. Main, James Neal , Arthur G. Newton, Iry Plckler, Ruthelyn Plummer, Richard T. Polis, Leslie A. Pontious, Charles E. Puckett, Don R. Roth, Sally Anne Sheridan, Wayne Silzel , Roger R. Stanton, Peer A. Swan, Charles E. Sylvia, James A. Wahner, Henry W. Wedaa, Edna Wilson, Grace H. Winchell NOES: None ABSENT: Tom Mays, Carrey J. Nelson, J. R. "Bob" Siefen, Don E. Smith, Wayne D. Wedin That the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget (CORF Joint Works Construction) of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, be, and is hereby, approved and adopted in the total amount of $103,422,000.00. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Fiscal Policy Committee to evaluate proposals That the Fiscal Policy Committee be, and to place Excess Workers' and is hereby, authorized and directed Com ensation insurance coverage to evaluate.proposals obtained by the effec ve u y 1, 1 Districts' insurance broker and to place Excess Workers' Compensation insurance coverage effective July 1, 1990; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said action shall be submitted to the Joint Boards for ratification or revision at the regular meeting on July 11, 1990. ALL DISTRICTS Supervisor Roth and Supervisor Approving Professional services Stanton expressed their opposition to Agreement with John Carollo the proposal to engage a consultant En ineers to conduct a foul air to conduct a foul air treatment treatment optimization study optimization study. In response to an inquiry from other Directors about the reason for his opposition, Supervisor Roth stated that he was opposed to spending this money for a consultant to interpret South Coast Air Quality Management District rules. He stated his belief that the rulemakers should interpret their own rules rather than passing the costs on to the Districts' ratepayers. Director Winchell then spoke in favor of the proposal stating that the agreement with John Carollo Engi:ieers was not solely for clarification of SCAQMD rules, but to determine the best use of the Districts' technology and to establish the standards to be used in the future for these rules and operational activities. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: -13- �/ 06/13/90 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 90-58, approving Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers to conduct a foul air treatment optimization study, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $85,000.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Directors Wes Bannister, Richard T. Polis, Don R. Roth. Wayne Silzel and Roger R. Stanton asked that their votes in opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizin t e Dec or o nance to cer 1fy claims airnd torwaro to That the Director of Finance be, and County Auditor for payment is hereby, authorized to certify claims and forward to the Orange County auditor for immediate payment for expenditures incurred after June 30, 1990, and that he declare that such certification shall comply with the provisions of Resolution No. 76-10 pertaining to procedures for payment of claims against the Districts until the 1990-91 budgets are adopted by the respective Districts. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive file an a rove ro osal 0 onnenschein, Na th 8 Rosentha , That the proposal of Sonnenschein, Attorneys At Law re continuation of Nath & Rosenthal , Attorneys At Law, services of Mr. Lee Paterson, Esq. dated June 6, 1990, for continuation of services of Mr. Lee Paterson, Esq. , now associated with said firm, as special labor counsel for the Districts, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Supplemental Agenda items relative to Summons and omplaints received subsequent to the a enda bein ooted re Job Nos. J- -4 and - Verbal report of General Counsel The General Counsel reported that the Districts had been served with two Summons and Complaints, subsequent to the agenda being posted, involving subcontractors who had filed Stop Notices against the Districts' general contractor, J. R. Roberts Corp. , in connection with Administration Building Addition, Jab No. J-7-4, and Warehouse and Maintenance Building and Oil Storange and Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20. Because he was required to respond to said lawsuits prior to the July Board meeting, the General Counsel advised that it would be necessary for the Boards to consider these matters that evening. Mr. Woodruff noted that while the Districts are named in these cases, he would endeavor to not actively participate and, if need be, will simply deposit the funds retained by the Districts' from the Contractor's progress payments into court to allow the contractor and the claimants to resolve their disputes. -14- 06/13/90 The General Counsel pointed out that because these proposed Supplemental Agenda items were unable to be posted 72 hours prior to the meeting, the Boards must vote on whether the matter should be .— considered prior to actually voting on the recommended actions. He noted that the decision by the Boards to consider these matters must be approved by a two-thirds vote of those present. Authorizinq consideration of Moved, seconded and unanimously upplemental Agenda items relative tarried: to receiving and filing Summons and Com Taints--The Burke Com any n vs. That the Boards of Directors do D P constructors, Inc. et al. , hereby authorize consideration of Case No. 625 re Job Na. -7-4, supplemental agenda items and Laborers ealth and Welfare relative to a Summons and Fund for Southern California vs. complaint for Enforcement of C OOC at al . Case No. 162600, re Public Work Stop Notices; Job No. J_ZU Enforcement of Public Work Payment Bond, and Amendments to said Complaint, The Burke Company vs. DSP Constructors, Inc. , at al . , Orange County Superior Court Case No. 625326, relative to a previous Stop Notice filed in connection with Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-74; and a Summons and Complaint to Foreclose Stop Notice and Against Payment Bond, Laborers' Health and Welfare Fund for Southern California, et al . vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, et al. , Orange County Municipal Court-West Judicial District Case No. 162600, relative to a previous Stop Notice filed in connection with Warehouse and Maintenance Building and Oil Storage and Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20, which were not posted 72 hours prior to the Board meeting date because the need to take said actions arose subsequent to the agenda being posted; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Counsel 's Memoranda relative to said Supplemental Agenda items, dated June 5, 1990 and June 13, 1990, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file Summons and Moved, seconded and duly carried: Complaint for Enforcement of Public Work Stop Notices; Enforcement of That the Summons and Complaint Public Work Payment Bond, and for Enforcement of Public Work Amendments to said Complaint The Stop Notices; Enforcement of Burke Lompany vs. DSP Constructors, Public Work Payment Bond, and Inc. , at al . Orange aunt u erior Amendments to said Complaint, The Court Case No. 62532 , re Stop Burke Company vs. DSP Notice filed on Job No. J-7-4 Constructors, Inc. , et al . , Orange County Superior Court Case No. 625326, relative to a previous Stop Notice filed in connection with Administration Building Addition, Job No. J-7-4, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. -15- O6/13/90 Receive and file Summons and Moved, seconded and duly carried: Complaint to Foreclose Stop Notice and a nst Payment Bond a ofi rersl That the Summons and Complaint to `../ Heaitn ano Welfare Fund for Southern Foreclose Stop Notice and Against California, et al . vs. Coun y Payment Bond, Laborers' Health Sanitation Districts of orange and Welfare Fund for Southern County, et al . , urange uo=4California, et al. vs. County Munici al Court-West Judi calSanitation Districts of Orange District ase No. 1926501 re Sto county, et al. , range oun y Notice filed on Job No. J- Municipal Court-West Judicial District Case No. 162600, relative to a previous Stop Notice filed in connection with Warehouse and Maintenance Building and Oil Storage and Dispensing Improvements, Job No. J-20, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, ` authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m., June 13, 1990. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 7 to the tans and s ecifications for That Change Order No. 7 to the plans ontract Nos. an and specifications for Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and Lampson Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2, and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27, authorizing an addition of $56,773.00 to the contract with W. H. Ebert Corp. for nine items of additional work and granting a time extension of 12 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 8 to the Tans and s ecifications for That Change Order No. 8 to the plans Contract Nos. 2-2 - and 2-41 and specifications for Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and Lampson Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2, and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a net addition of $270,519.30 to the contract with W. H. Ebert Corp. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting ontract No. 2-26-2 and Contract No. 2-27 as complete That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 90-59-2, accepting Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Edinger Avenue and Lampson Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-2, and South Anaheim Relief Sewer, on Ball Road between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-27, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby �.../ made a part of these minutes. -I6- 06/13/90 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving lans and s eciP ca tons for contract Nos. -26-3, 2-28 and That the Board of Directors hereby 2-ff adopts Resolution No. 90-60-2, approving plans and specifications for Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, Between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract No. 2-26-3; Katella Relief Sewer, Between Euclid Street and Walnut Street, Contract No. 2-28; and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29 (and City of Anaheim Street Improvements), and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin A reemen w Kraemer Im ertal Associates re acce ante That the Board of Directors hereby of new urant of Easement in adopts Resolution No. 90-61-2, connec on with real i ned ortion approving Agreement with Kraemer of Contract No. - 2- A and Imperial Associates relative to author z n execution of a acceptance of new Grant of Easement Corporation ui tclaim Deed in connection with a realigned portion of the Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9 (Realignment entitled Contract No. 2-9A); and approving and authorizing execution of a Corporation Quitclaim Deed, quitclaiming the District's interest in a portion of the original sewer line and easement therefor from Kraemer Imperial Associates. Said resolution, by reference hereto, 1s hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing General Counsel to file a com aint in the Munici al Burt That the General Counsel be, and is to seek recover of un a sewer hereby, authorized to file a connection Tees trom tsenco complaint in the Municipal Court Development seeking recovery of unpaid sewer connection fees in the amount of $7,038.00 from Benco Development. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing General ounse to file a complaint in the Municipal our That the General Counsel be, and is to seek recovery OT unpaid sewer hereby, authorized to file a connection fees from Bristol Lane complaint to the Municipal Court Associates seeking recovery of unpaid sewer connection fees in the amount of $11,593.81 from Bristol Lane Associates. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman , then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m. , June 13, 1990. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: ' r`ovIn g Addendum o. 1 to the plans an spec Pications Tor That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and contract No. -35-1 specifications for South Coast Trunk Sewer, Phase I, Contract No. 5-35-1, making miscellaneous technical and traffic control clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved. -17- 06/13/90 DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: war Contract o. o W. MarcCorp. That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 90-64-5, �./ receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for South Coast Trunk Sewer, Phase I, Contract No. 5-35-1, to W. H. Ebert Corp. in the total amount of $880,066.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: A rovin Memorandum a nders an n w th a ry ne ompany re Contract That the Memorandum of Understanding No. 5-34-3 with The Irvine Company re construction of Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-34-3, be, and is hereby, approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Chairman and Secretary be, and are hereby, authorized to sign said Memorandum of Understanding in form approved by the General Counsel. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m., June 13, 1990. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: AdJournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. .6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m., June 13, 1990. DISTRICTS 7 8 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive f e an den amended claim of pu ern a fornia d son That the amended claim of Southern Company re Contract No. 14-1-18 California Edison Company dated May 18, 1990 (original claim in an estimated amount dated 4/13/90 never received and filed) in the amount of $4,328.74 for alleged damages to a 12,000 volt line incurred during construction of Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road (and City of Costa Mesa street improvements), Contract No. 14-1-18, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the Districts' General Counsel , liability claims administrator, contractor and contractor's insurance company for appropriate action. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Tu—thorizing initiation o roceedin s re ro ose Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby o. 1 ams Annexation adopts Resolution No. 90-65-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex 2.50 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of the southeast corner of the intersection of Leman Heights Drive and Lower Lake Drive in unincorporated County territory (proposed Annexation No. 135 - �.,� Williams Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -18- 06/13/90 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: AdJournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m. , June 13, 1990. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m. , June 13, 1990. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m. , June 13, 1990. DISTRICT 3 c ons ursuant to the Boards re eve o en a enc tax increment 8olicy re Cypress Kedevelo men enc Los Alamitos Race rack an olf uours2 ede opment ro ec and the Lincoln Revedevelopment Project Receive and file letter from GRC Moved, seconded and duly carried: Redevelopment onsU an s, Inc. That the letter from GRC Redevelopment Consultants, Inc. dated April 11, 1990 proposing a pass-through of historical , proportional annual tax increment to District re Los Alamitos Race Track and Golf Course Redevelopment Project, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. A rovin A reement with C ress Moved, seconded and duly carried: Redeve o mant A enc re Los Alamitos Race Track and Goltourse That the Board of Directors Redevelopment Project hereby adopts Resolution No. 90-62-3, approving Agreement with Cypress Redevelopment Agency, re pass-through of historical , proportional annual tax increment to District relative to the Los Alamitos Race Track and Golf Course Redevelopment Project. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Electing a tax increment pass- Moved, seconded and duly carried: throw h re Lincoln Avenue Redevelopment Project That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 90-63-3, electing a tax increment pass-through, pursuant to Section 33676 of the Health and Safety Code, relative to the Lincoln Avenue Redeve3opment Project. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -19- 06/13/90 DISTRICTS 3 & 11 Actions re Addendum o. I to e Professional 5ervim A reent with John arollo Engi em neers for preparation of Project Report re Contract No. 11-17 to rovide for esign and construction services Verbal report of staff The Director of Engineering reported that at the May Board meeting Directors approved a Project Report relative to Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17. Said improvements were included in the Districts' new 1989 30-year Master Plan. The Master Plan also identified the needed improvements as a joint project to serve portions of Districts 3 and 11 and would realize considerable savings to both Districts over the old master-planned system. In May the Boards also approved an agreement between the two Districts providing for financing, design, construction, capacity ownership (based on flows) and operation of certain master-planned sewage collection facilities serving Districts 3 and 11, including the Slater Avenue Pump Station system. Mr. Dawes advised that included within the drainage area originally anticipated to be served by the Slater Avenue Pump Station is 1,608 acres of land south of Los Patos Avenue and southeasterly of Warner Avenue, generally known as the Bolsa Chica area. In April 1987 the Directors of District 11 authorized the staff and General Counsel to negotiate an annexation agreement with the property owners. The Signal Bolsa Corporation is the principal landowner and the Board's action was pursuant to Signal Bolsa's request. The Bolsa Chica area is presently outside the boundary of District 11 but within its sphere of influence. Signal Bolsa principals and counsel and Districts' staff and counsel have met numerous times over the past several years in an attempt to come to a pre-annexation agreement. However, Signal Bolsa Corporation is not yet ready to annex and recently advised staff that they are no longer willing to proceed with the proposed pre-annexation agreement. The last draft of the proposed agreement provided for the annexation of the Bolsa Chica area and prepayment of fees for those areas to be developed by Signal Bolsa to provide the necessary funding for construction of capacity in the Slater Pump Station system to serve the Bolsa Chica area if, and when, it is annexed. Because of the urgent need to proceed with design and construction of the facilities, staff reported that two letters were sent to Signal Bolsa advising them that they must make a decision by May 16, 1990 on the pre-annexation agreement, and that without such an agreement, the Districts could provide no assurances that the area could be annexed or sewage service provided by the Districts in the future. Mr. Dawes reported that to date, Signal Bolsa had not responded to the Districts' letters. ub/W/Vu Staff noted that at the May Board meeting, it was the consensus of the Directors that unless a pre-annexation agreement was executed by Bolsa Chica property owners, capacity to serve the area should not be included in the Districts' Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System. Accordingly, staff recommended that that the Boards proceed with negotiations for design and construction of this system. Mr. Dawes advised that a final decision on the capacity of the pump station would need to be made at the time the design contract is awarded, probably in July or August. Directors then commented on recent events indicating that The Koll Company may be replacing Signal Bolsa Corporation as the major developer of Bolsa Chica. Staff advised that they were aware of this and had been trying to contact officials at Koll regarding the Bolsa Chico annexation issue. Staff and Directors then entered into a lengthy discussion regarding issues discussed at the May Board meeting relative to whether or not the Slater Avenue Pump Station should be sized to provide capacity for the Bolsa Chica area without a pre-annexation agreement, which would require the rate-payers in Districts 3 and 11 to front the costs without any assurance that they would be recovered in the future. It was once again pointed out that if capacity for Bolsa Chica is not included in the Slater Pump Station system, Signal Bolsa (or The Koll Company) would have to construct its own sewer lines through the Bolsa Chica area and tie into the Districts' Coast Trunk Sewer at a cost that would be substantially higher than putting up the money now for capacity to the Slater Avenue Pump Station sewage system. Staff also reviewed the alternative Slater System capacities, costs and relative share between Districts 3 and 11 and without Bolsa Chica. Staff reported that although the increase in costs to build the upsized pump station to provide capacity for the Bolsa Chica area may seem relatively small , it would be a substantial burden to District 11 without the prepayment of annexation fees by Signal Bolsa. Mr. Dawes further pointed out that if capacity for Bolsa Chica is not included in the Slater Avenue Pump Station system, District 11 would realize additional savings in the future because the need for a proposed $2 million conveyance sewer would be eliminated. Mr. Dawes reiterated that staff would attempt to meet with The Koll Company prior to asking the Directors to make a decision on the proposed capacity of the Slater Avenue Pump Station system. He indicated staff would report back to them at the July or August Board meeting with further information. Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Staff Report dated June 5, 1990 re Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Authorizlian the Se o.lection Cormittee Moved, seconded and duly carried: - to negotte Adden um N1 _ That the Selection Committee be, and is hereby, authorize" to solicit a proposal and negotiate Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carolio Engineers for preparation of Phase I Preliminary Project Report for Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17, to provide for preparation of plans and specifications and construction support services. -21- 06/13/90 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: ]ournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:29 p.m., June 13, 1990. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:29 p.m. , June 13, 1990. Secretary of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 `./ -22- FUND 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING 'DATE 5/02/91 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY. ( CLAIMS PAID 05/09/90 POSTING DATE 05/39/90 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION f 106622 ABBE COMPANY/INAGEN CORP. $212.19 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 106623 AT 6 1 $420.43 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICE 106624 SCHILTKNECHT MESSTECHNIK AG $604.00 METER REPAIR i 106625 LINCOLN CARPETS 8 INTER19PS $311.41 CARPET REPAIR 106b26 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS. INC. $579.9N7.00 CONSTRUCTION PT-34-2 /, ]06627 AIR PRODUCTS R CHEMICAL INC. $15.296.00 06M AGREEMENT --OXYGEN GEN SYSTEM M.O.8-9-89 106628 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT $25.88 ASPHALT 106629 ALLVATER SERVICES $2,450.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICE 106630 ALTA SALES. INC. $585.07 INSTRUMENT PART 106631 ROB CO INC. 0/OR AMERICAN SEALS $7,004.68 CASKETS 6 SEALS 106632 AMERICAN TECHNICAL SUPPLY $369.22 CABERA / 106633 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $15.103,43 NOTICES 6 ADS 106634 APPLE ONE 57.122.70 TEMPORARY SERVICES 106635 ARIZONA INSTRUMENTS CORP. $424.50 INSTRUMENT PARTS 106636 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CD. $1,564.13 TRUCK PARTS { 106637 THE AVEBURY GROUP $2,529.98 MECHANICAL PARTS 10663A RC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY. INC. $661.50 CABLE 106639 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 6114.055.91 GRIT REEOVAL M.0.7-13-88 { 106640 BANANA BLUE PRINT S1.533.19 PRINTING 106641 P.Y. RAROTTI AND ASSOC. $5,437.50 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES P1-34-162.P2-31 X 106642 BAXTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $1.597.35 LAB SUPPLIES 2 106643 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $754.95 INSTRUMENT 106644 JAMES SEN27E $413.48 METING EXPENSE M b0 106645 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS 9206.68 OFFICE SUPPLIES 106646 BRAGS CRANE A PIGGING CO. $1,562.00 CRANE RENTAL 106647 BR INDERSON CORP. $1.071,352.80 CONSTRUCTION J-19-2 1 y 106648 BROWN 6 CALDWELL CONSULTING $226.281.78 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19 1 106649 KATRINA BROWN S RUSSELL BROWN 5975.00 LIABILITY CLAIMS 106650 STEVE BUBALO CONSTRUCTION CO. $596,715.41 CONSTRUCTION 14-1-IB 106651 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $569.69 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 106652 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES. INC. $10.584.OG ENGINEERING SERVICES - SURVEYING 106653 GARY G. STREED S1.320.44 PETTY CASH NEIIOIURSEENT T 106654 CAL-CHEM SALES $149.35 RUBBER PRODUCTS 106655 CAL SOUTH EQUIPMENT CO. $495.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 106656 CAL STATE SEAL COMPANY $97.30 PUMP PARTS t 106657 CALTROL . INC. $12.90 REGULATOR PARTS 106658 CAL TYPE OFFICE MACHINES. INC. $49.84 TYPENRITTER MAINTENANCE 106659 CALIFORNIA FILTRATION $243.02 FILTER { 106660 JOHN CAROLLO ENS. 910.545.16 ENGINEERING SERVICES - STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS 196661 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS 3221.904.0E ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-36.P2-42.PI-20.I-9 196662 CASTLE CONTROLS. INC. 3568.6P VALVE 106663 CENTURY SAFETY INST. R SUPP. $204.90 SAFETY SUPPLIES 106664 CHALLENGE. BEARING R IND. SPLY $711.23 HARDWARE 106665 KELLY CHRISTENSEN $413.75 MEETING EXPENSE 106666 CHROMALOY SALES $1,829.11 ELECTRIC PART 10E667 CHROME CRANKSHAFT. INC. $480.00 MECHANICAL PARTS L J � FUND NO 919- JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/02/9V PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/09/90 POSTING DATE 05/09/90 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 106668 CHUBB GROUP OF INS.. AS $6,148.64 LIABILM CLAIM 106669 CORINNE CLAISON $223.75 MEETING EXPENSE / /96679 COAST AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION 5309.74 TRUCE PARTS I16671 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $81.50 FIRE EQUIPMENT 106672 COLICM AND SONS '$347.395.50 CONSTRUCTION 7-11-16 106673 C.I.E.S. . CO. . INC. $660.00 PUMP PARTS 106674 CONNELL G.M. PARTS / DIV. 5258.99 TRUCK PAR15 106675 CON-WAY WESTERN EXPRESS $57.37 FREIGHT 106676 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST, SA. 122.31 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 106677 CONS OLIDATED PLASTICS CO. SBT1.81 SAMPLE PARTS 106678 CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPHICS $96.43 BLUEPRIHIING (- 106679 CONTAINCRIIED CHEMICAL OISPOSA 51.399.00 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL 106680 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS S1.841.95 BLUEPRINTING M.O.7-1 89 106682 CONTROL CAULES. INC. $34.76 TRUCK PARTS / 106682 COOPER INDUSTRIES. INC. $2.820.145.68 ENGINES M.O. 5-13-67.6-8-88 3-19A 106683 COORDINATED EQUIP. CO.. INC. $500.00 TRUCK PARTS 106684 R. E. COULTER CRANE RENTAL $1.188.00 RENTAL BQUIPMEHT (. 106685 COUNTY VHOLESALE ELECTRIC 51.174.94 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 106686 CRYSTAL CLEAR WINDOW MAINT. 5515.25 WINDOW CLEANING 106687 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE S457.66 TIMES / X 1P6688 TOM DAMES 3355.93 MEETING EXPENSE Z 106689 DE ANZA CORPORATION 5920.00 STORAGE FEES 106690 MICHAEL R. DEBLIEUX $19.229.33 DRUBBED) C0UP PAYOFF 1 CAI 106691 DESKTOP GRAPHICS A DESIGN $24.00 PRINTING 106692 DEZURIK AND/OR CS CO. $3.732.38 VALVE PARTS 106693 DICKSONS f838.74 ELECTRIC PARTS 1 106694 OIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES S494.06 PRINTING - TJ 106695 D1 SCO PRINT COMPANY $ A.561.ei OFFICE EQUIPMENT 106696 DORA00 EN T E.R PRI SE S. INC. 57.218.87 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS L 106697 DONN EDWARDS CORP. $1.121.85 PAINT SUPPLIES 106698 EASTMAN. INC. 52.298.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES 106699 W. H. EBERT CORP. $526,759.50 CONSTRUCTION 2-26-2.2-27 106700 EFFECTIVE VISUAL IMAGERY S476.53 PRESENTATION AIDS 106701 ELECTRO NUMERICS INC. 12.997.72 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1067V2 EOVARO L. ELLIOT, JP.. S2.182.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-33 106703 ENCMANTER. INC. 511.800.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.3-14-90 116704 FACILITIES SUPPORT CO. $235.49 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 106705 JOHN B. FALKENSTEIN P.E. S4.925.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-4,J-20 106706 FARR SALES a SERVICE $217.86 FILTER 106707 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. 5169.25 AIR FREIGHT 106708 FERRELLGAS $22.95 PROPANE 106709 FISCHER 6 PORTER CO. 5122.966.74 CHLORINATION PARTS /INSTRUMENT M.0.12-14-88 106710 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $335.75 LAB SUPPLIES 106711 FLAT B VERTICAL CONCRETE 2197.50 CONCRETE CUTTING 1` 1I6712 FLEXIBLE SYSTEMS 5338.92 STRAINER 106713 FLUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $1,455.45 PIMP J • > C ' FUND 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5102/90 PAGE 3 f REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/09/90 POSTING DATE IA5/09/90 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 106TIS FORPORO CO. / NAG SYSTEMS 92,978.04 INSTRUMENTBUILDING SUPPLIES 106715 6ANAML LV NBER CO. 39TB.09 BU[LOING MATERIALS I l0E)17 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. S1.B00.50 TELEPHONE SERVICES l06717 OE0R 6E LEECH R AS i411.25 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 106718 GIERLICH-MITCNF.LL. INC. $3,769.88 MECHANICAL PARTS 1. 106T19 60LDEN COAST SAWDUST PR00. $3,025.00 SAWDUST 106720 1000 HEART WILCOX CO. 925.29 PUBLICATION 106721 GRAPHIC CONTROLS 5191.87 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 106722 GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION $420.00 ! STREET SWEEPING 106723 OON GREEK L ASSOCIATES $4.111.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES - SURVEYING 106724 GEORGE T. HALL CO. $2.985.18 SCRUBBER PARTS �. 106725 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $312.93 GAUGE 106726 HARRIS DATA COMIC. 3NC. $299.63 COMPUTER REPAIRS 106727 JANES R. HARRIS $137.01 MEETING EXPENSE 106TPP . HATCH 8 KIRK. INC. $2,925.01 MECHANCCAL PALATE .106729 MARV AND BUSINESS REVIEW $55.00 PUBLICATION ' 106730 WILLIAM D. HAUSER $426.00 MEETING EXPENSE /. 106731 S. A. HEALY CO. $102.603.59 CONSTRUCTION PI-35-1 106732 HIL TI. INC. $25.66 WASHER 106733 HOERBIGER C.V.S. CALIF. A INC. $110.13 MECHANICAL PARTS 106739 HOUSE OF BATTERIES $96.65 BATTERIES 106735 R.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. $3.969.93 PAINT SUPPLIES 106736 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STAMP 9910.94• RUBBER STAMPS b0 106737 IND INDUSTRIES 91029.22 ELECTRIC PARTS 106738 ISCO. INC. 519.025.00 ENGINE PARTS ID6739 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $102.747.37. FERRIC CHLONGHt M.0.11-08-89 n 106740 INDUSTRIAL METAL SUPPLY CO. $1.168.28 BASIN MILS W IOb 741 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1.246.59 CONNE RS 106792 IHEI LCO OE GREMORY, INC. 59.198.06 MECHANICAL PARTS 106743 INGRAM PAPER 91.383.38 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 106744 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $1.025.31 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 106745 J S W SCIENTIFIC 91.530.72 LAB SUPPLIES / 10670E JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $897.69 INSTRUMENT PARTS 116717 JENSEN IDOLS 9 ALLOYS $154.53 TOOLS 106748 JOYCE OFFICE PRODUCTS $60.95- OFFICE SUPPLIES 106749 KA LLEEN•3 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 91.509.33 OFFICE SUPPLIES �+ 1P6750 KAMAN BEARINGS 6 SUPPLY $67.60 FITTINGS 106751 KANER COMPANY $1,508.49 HARDWARE / 106782 THE KEITH COMPANIES 9418.75 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-3565-36 1236753 KENRO. INC. $700.113.70 CONSTRUCTION 5-36-2 106754 KIEWIT PACIFIC CO. 6388.257.60i CONSTRUCTION PI-20 L 106755 KING BEARING, INC. 91.820.53 MECHANICAL PARTS 10675E KHOR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $197.66 mots IR6757 MARTIN BOADICKA SP $2.550.09. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 1-16-IB 106758 L 9 C TIRE SERVICE $85.00 TRUCK PARTS �- 106759 L.A. LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $295.29 PUMP PARTS L. ( FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/1)2/90 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/09/90 POSTING DATE 05/09/90 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION / 106760 LIEBERT ASSOCIATES OF $179.82 ELECTRIC PARTS 166761 JOHN LISCE PUMPS* INC. 536.13 FREIGHT / 106762 LORAIN PRODUCTS SI.190.65 SERVICE ACREEIONT - LIANCB POWER 106763 NPS 1293.31 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVIC 106764 KACOMCD f1A7.2D SERVICE REMOUNT / 106766 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS. INC. $2,574.50 MECHANICAL PUTS 111066 N A M ASSOCIATION f1.358.93 MEMBERSHIP 106767 KARVAC ELECTRONICS $194.26 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 106768 MATT - CHLORr INC. S2r172.92 MECHANICAL PARTS 106769 METE MA $58.85 INSTRUMENT 106770 MCKENNA ENGR. 6 EQUIP. $5,121.41 PUMP PARTS 1 0677 1 NCMASTER-CARP SUPPLY CO. SI.053.82 PUMP PASTS 106772 NICK GAGE COMPUTER 512.009.89 OFFICE EQUIPMENT I96773 HICROAGE COMPUTER STORES l9r059.R1 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 106774 MICROSOFT QUICK BASIC 4.5 1320.94 COMPUTER SOFTWARE UP PAGE I06775 MILTON ROY COMPANY 1294.33 POMP PARTS I06776 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES f1.800.75 IAB SERVICES �- 106777 NOORE PRODUCTS CO. SIr512.55 TRANSDUCER 106778 MOTION INDUSTRIES. INC. 9016.99 MECHANICAL PUTS 106779 NAT. COUNCIL FOR ED. ON INFO. 5225.O0 REGISTRATION M X 106700 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSN f33.50 PUBLICATIONS = 106781 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES. INC. $97,499.26 CONSTRUCTION 5-27 1067R2 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $A50.66 COMPUTER PUT T W 106783 OUST N. MENDERS CONEY. CO. 92,985.43T.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-33 106789 NENARM ELECTRONICS 559.35 COMPUTER PARTS I06785 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $6.00 WATER USEAGE 1 106786 NORTH SUPPLY $58.30 VIOLS 106787 OFFICE PAVILION/INTERIOP RES. f95.699.75 OFFICE FURNITURE J-7T4 r 106780 IN SYSTEMS CO. f28.501.36 CHLORINE M.0.2-14-W 106789 OLYMPIC CHEMICAL COMPANY $2.987.29 CHLORINE M.0.2-14-90 106790 ORANGE BEARING. INC. $162.57 MECHANICAL PUTS 106791 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. 5190.10 TRUCK PUTS M 106792 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO. 31.6B5.9P HYDROCHLORIC ACID 116793 Ofl AH BE Sp OPTING GOODS f]91.2A LINE MARKER 206794 ORANGE VALVE A FITTING CO. f1.069.R9 FITTINGS 10f795 OSCAR•S LOCK A SAFE f111.5f LACKS 106796 OXYGEN SERVICE $155.96 SPECIALTY GASES 106797 COU14TY OF ORANGE $200.DO MAPPING 106798 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 14.926.67 DEMAND COMP DISTRIBUTION I UR 799 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT S4.929.91 REIMBURSE MUM COP INSURANCE 106800 PACIFIC PARTS $5.454.59 INSTRUMENT PUTS I E6801 PACIFIC PROCESS EBUIPMENT.INC. f1.179.5P IPCBANCIU PUTS 1U68U2 PACIFIC SAFETY FO LIP "ENT CO. At r 097.B9 SAFETY SUPPLIES 106603 PACIFIC BELL 5709.59 TELEPHONE SERVICES 106809 PACTEL CELLULAP $153.3T CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 106805 PAK NEST $333.20 JANITORIAL SUPPLIER L- J • FUNB( 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/62/90 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/09/90 POSTING DATE 05/09/90 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 106897 PEERLESS WIPING MATERIALS CO. 5649.3E JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 146808 PERFORMANCE SEMINAR GROUP $165.40 INSTRUMENT �- 10680E PERSPECTIVE ISEMEASUREMENTS $tl.256.81 INSTRUMENT 106810 POLY ENTER INC. r INC. S990.25 SAFETY SUPPLIES 10681I POWER SE, INC. f28SL91.27 POLYMERS M.O.1-10-90,E-9-89 / 106A11 POWER SYSTE9S 1191.89 ENGINE PARTS 106813 HARD LD PRIMROSE ICE 240.00 ICE 106814 THE PROJECTS SOLUTION OCO.NS f9,240.00 PUBLCAIONSINSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.8-10-BB I06815 PENO OR EILLELECT PUBLICATIONS ,027.70 PUBLICATIONS OOT 106815 R.P.N. ELECTRIC MOTORS f1.027.74 MEETING MOTOR REPAIR 106817 DAYID RAT 3602.39 SAFETY EXPENSE 106818 RED WING SHOES f87.51 SAFETY SHOES 106R10 REMOTE METER RESETTING SYSTEM f30.05 POSTAGE $56 106519 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. f560.05 MECHANIC SUPPLIES I06820 REMOLD POWER TRANSMISSION 5107.95 NCCN SERE PARTS 106822 MILTON Sr WATSON b GE0.SHON S64.00 LEGAL MEETING M.0.6-11-86 106822 MILTON RIVERS f573.22 CONSTRUCTION TIONNlq6J- T IC6824 J. R. ROBERTS CORP. l966.671.7P FREIGHT J-1] - 106825 ROOT TRUCKING S35.Dl INSIGHT 106826 ROSEMITE INC.ILOC f2.635.00 IATTERIES PARTS �. X 106827 SAB WIFE IN f1$265.00 PAS CLE Z 106828 SAFETY ANLCEN CORP. f283.68 PAR'[S CLCANSH ]06825 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS f2S3.6P ELECTRIC MOTOR ( w 106829 SANTA FE BAG CO. $395.78 BAGS 106830 THE SCHOOLER CO. $2.200.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 106831 SCHULER ENGINEERING CORP. $235.803.78 CONSTRUCTION PI-27-162 n 106832 SEA COAST DESIGNS $3,932.62 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1 106833, SEARS. ROEBUCK R CO. $95.60 TOOLS 106834 S.F. SERRANTINO 3539.7E - MEETING EXPENSE 106835 SEWER EQUIP. CO. OF AMERICA $2,645.00 TOOLS 106836 SHAMROCK SECURITY $411.00 SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS 106837 SHAMROCK SUPPLY f254.50 TOOLS 106838 SMITH-EMERY CO. $5,410.04 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89 IT6839 SOFT YAREH OUSE 5128.8F COMPUTER PARTS 10604U SO. COAST AIR QUALITY f1,350.00 APPLICATION FEES / 106841 SO. CALIF. COASTAL WATER f200.0UQ.OU SCCWRPA ADVANCE 106842 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. f4.197.93 POWER 106845 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. 35.754.30 DIESEL FUEL 106844 SPACESPVER SYSTEMS. INC. $2,161.25 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 106045 SPARKLETIS DRINKING WATER f1,628.57 DRINKING WATER 106846 STAMEN Z. SPASSOFF, P.E. f5.760.L0 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2.P1-33,P1-37 C 106047 STAR TOOL a SUPPLY CO. $656.93 TOOLS 106848 SUMMIT STEEL $1,232.50 STEEL 1P6849 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $178.50 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ` 106850 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL. INC. $858.93 TOOLS 106051 T b C INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS, INC $1,291.23 ELECTRIC PARTS 1, J � FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/32/9C PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/09/90 POSTING DATE 05/09/90 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 106852 TALIN TIRE. INC. $2.263.34 TIRES 166853 THE TEXWIPE COMPANY f129.19 OFFICE SUPPLIES / IP EM 6854 THEO-TELLO-BUSCH, INC. AM OU CHLORINE SYST REPAIRS 106855 THERMO ANALYTICAL, INC./NNOCAL f16.00 LAB SERVICES 106856 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE, INC. $16.688.44 TRAFFIC CONTROL. DIST 3 IC6857 TRAVEL TRAVEL f4,432.00 TRAVEL SERVICES M.0.6-14-87 186858 TRUCK A AUTO SUPPLY, INC. $878.81 TRUCK PARTS 106959 J.G. TUCKER A SON, INC. $575.30 INSTRUMENT PARTS IC6860 TWINING LABORATORIES OF 28,242.75 SOIL TESTING H.0.6-14-89 106861 UNOCAL S201.85 UNLEADED GASOLINE 106862 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE S70.99 PARCEL SERVICES �- 106E63 VWR SCIENTIFIC $1,396.50 LAB SUPPLIES IO6R64 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $5,788.28 FITTINGS 106865 VALLEY OETROIT DIESEL $637.50 ENGINE REPAIRS 106866 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 1406.42 SAFETY SUPPLIES 106P67 RICHARD W. VON LANCER f349.16 MEETING EXPENSE 106868 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $710.75 REPAIR MANUAL 106869 WALTER$ WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 91.352.57 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 106870 JOHN R. NAPLES $533.30 ODOR CONTROL CONSULS ITT 1068T1 WARRINGTON 1115.00 INSTRUMENT MIBUT14 N !X 106872 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY 114,042.94 CAUSTIC SODA X.0.8-9 69 = 1060T3 'WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. 1825.16 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES ID6R74 WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY $4.949.63 - - INSECTICIDE to 106875 JAMES B JUDI'TH WILSON $365.74 LIABILITY CLAIM 106876 WORDPERFECT CORP. $1,845.93 C@RUTER SOFTNARE 106877 XEROX CORP. f5.045.28 COPIER LEASES L� R NG 1.23 MTING EXPENSE 1I1,O66817188 2NOIEBISTIAN f814.10 CONSTRUCTION PI-34-1 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 05/09/90 112.758.570.01 I. ( (J. J • 'l 10 9199 - JT DIET WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/02/90 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMECR AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/09/90 POSTING DATE 05/09/90 ' SUKHARY AMOUNT 02 OPEN POND P 663.83 02 CAP PAC FUND 627.797.45 03 OPEN PON) - 16.975.22 05 OPEN POND 1,446.71 05 GAP PAC FUND 822.360.63 06 CAP PAC POND 1,175.25 07 OPEN FOND 3,878.28 07 CAP PAC POND 394,805.4E /11 OPEN POND 51.26 Oil CAP PAC FOND 318.01 7 014 CAP PAC PIRID 451,350.10 0566 CAP PAC FM 66.689.26 0667 OPEN POND 2,045.60 07614 OPEN FUND 9.14 JT OPEN POND 399,974.42 CORD 9.572,462.4E SELF FUNDED WOMEN COMP INSURANCE PON 12,417.85 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND 364,149.04 m aC 0 12,758,570.01 2 Ctl H-„ n V / 1 - 1. J • FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAF116L PPOCESSING DATE 5/17/9n PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AI'4S COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OPANGE_ COUNTY � CLAIMS PAID 047R319t. FOSf INs OA7E IIS�2!%9 S . ' . YRRRANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT ., OESCR IP710N 106928 A-1 EXPRESS DELIVFRY SERVICE $23.31 FREIGHT i. 106929 AND KENT. INC. $99.28 _INSTRUMENT PART___-___,___,____,___ 1 C'6930 AT L T $777.73 - LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES / • 106931 ACADEMY OF DEFENSIVE DRIVING $670.00 DRIVER TRAINING 106932 ACCU-LABS RESEARCH• INC. 3106.00 LAB SERVICES 1 OE933 THE ADVANCE GROUP $66.26 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 106934 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS. INC. 3253.656.50 CONSTRUCTION PI-34-2 106935 ACRO TECH SURVETS. INC. S1.466.25 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY n _.__.-.. ._- 106937 AIRCRAFT HURTING L ELECTRICAL 528.48 TRUCK PART 106937 AIR COLD SUPPLY CHEMICAL $520.A0 OAK GREEME 10693B AIR PRODUCTS 8 CHEMICAL INC. $15.296.00 OAK AGREEMENT - OXYGEN OW 848TE1 M.0.8-9-89___ ' --III69S9--���—LEaIII'N6�9c'IA7LRTn LL STT T-di !---- — SIr293.52 - ---AUtONOBtLBiv:aRB 106940 SAFETY SUPPLY AMERICA $12.6/ SAFETY SUPPLIES 106941 ALPHAGA2 $1.360.10 PROPANE -'III69di Y SERVICES �(.�i94.00 VACIIDM SRUCE 68RVIC6 r 106943 AMERICAN DISTRICT TELEGRAPH 3553.16 SERVICE AGREEMENT 106944 ROBCO INC. $/OR AMERICAN SEALS $4,566.68 GASKETS 6 SEALS .7,6041�NEWrj TI�TFENNTS.r NUFFEY ' _--s6e.s� cAileRA I .+ 106946 AMERICAN VULKAN COOP. 39.E22.77 MECHANICAL PARTS 106947 AMERITECH S97.75 COPIER LEASE I R6$d6 L�}7-8F-CFI! IIE ITI 1,235,401.44 SEIICRREMBILITA710N— I1.0.12-Id-55— / : 106949 APPLE ONE $1.119.20 TEMPORARY SERVICES 106950 ARATEK SERVICES, INC. 31.611.59 UNIFORM eEXTAL9 Q -]AR%II(---TSI N�DL�S ARHRNYr§ - —__—dT01.9T' MEETING E%T6NS8 S� 106952 ARIZONA INSTRUMENTS CORP. $127.50 INSTRUMENT PARTS _ 106953 ARROW TRUCK BODIES 6 EOUIFMENT $2,186.75 TOOL SOX TR6Ys�--FssdE7A7€11 SOTI�YFOINEFF1Fc 9.§IB.O�ROIL TESTING- + M 1U6955 AMSA $100.00 REGISTRATION 10695A FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 3167/592.94 GRIT REMOVAL M.0.7-13- T0693T- ---P.Y-II�OTT1 AN I�A52N� f6r31T0:00 CONSTRUCTION-SERVICES F + 196958 3. BATEMAN S585.00 DEFERRED CORP DISTRIBUIGN +� 106959 BANTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS _ _ $2.598.80 _LAB SUPPLIES_ .l WOLF— SOEAY-O€1N�M7CITFN'i'RIIR�6-A3— —f37:3TE.66 RNGiNRNRINc"RRRVI R3 d:3-33- 106961 BIOCYCLE $89.00 PUBLICATION 106962 HOWARD BLEVINS 3200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIB ON i 06963.._--_—NDTRC�A2IIAOL`OFFTOE—R660ZTS-.—..__._ ..-- .__.._.i16R.AS -.--.---_.---- ...-61FICE SUPPLIES..__ .... _..__.-__ .____. 106964 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $4,327.32 RADIATOR REPAIRS 106965 BON-A-RUES $263.44 TRUCK PARTS :+ -iIIs96d-""—IIOiCE'-EAO7NEER IAOTOD7 '- d1-g543:00 -- -'- —--"- ----BxelxeeRlNG sepvices - - ( 106967 BROWN S CALDYELL $2,559.75 LAB SERVICES 106968 BROWN L CALDYELL CONSULTING" $138,738.75 ENGINEERING SERVICES J- 9 3194':SS_ _.. -.._ - _. --.- ELECTRIC RUFPLERO - __. _..._..._._ ._._ . n 106970 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES. INC. $6,552.00 SURVEYING SERVICES US 8-71 +. 106971 GARY G. STREEO $257.47 PETTY CASH REIHBURSEU �. 106973 CPT CORP. / SUMMIT SOLUTIONS 32.205.08 MAINTENANCE AGREE W 1 _ FUND N( 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/11/9P PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP45 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ----- CCAIMTTAIU D5723790-POST ING"DA7 C'0 57 237 90--- ''_. . / . WARRANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT OC SC4 WTION 106974 IS COMPANY $3.262.07 VALVE PARTS 206975 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH• INC. f2.001.17 LAB SUPPLIES AG9976_'-' CALTROLT'TNC— "- -1T.i7U�T� RBCUi.AYbn"PnRTB-' --- ( 106977 CALIF. BUSINESS LAW INSTITUTE $699.00 REGISTRATION 106978 CALIFORNIA FILTRATION _ _ $1,162.93 ENGINE PARTS - --[BS977—CARD CC7f�66VCE'FNG]REEKS— —-"-CI�13 S.1�- BNCINBBRINC SBRVICe5�Re5 A9-121 ii 106980 LCANDRE P. CATACUTAN $344.68 MEETING EXPENSE 106981 CHALLENGE BEARING 1 IND. SPLY $766.94 MECHANICAL PARTS IDE932 bLUMbL A, LHARrTTr--- 7,' 106983 CHEM SERVICE $55.52 LAB SUPPLIES 106984 CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC. f14.290406 UNLEADED GASOLINE - io -1D69A5- CRK RBEZR'RNRSA7fFT� IN,. salo.00 - neCiLiMh411.'PARYB ""--- --- f 7 196966 COLICH AND SONS $363.647.73 CONSTRUCTION 7-ll-ll 106987 COMFRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF $3,265.13 FITTINGS -fOb9RR --CONRECLT,.Ir. "P'RATI DIV. FREW ! n 196989 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL GIST. 16,223.85 ELECTRICAL PARTS 106990 CONSOLIDATED FRE16HTMAYS. $301.54" FREIGHT -- ---10A991 CORTTREMC_CWERR'AL CO ---- j, 106992 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS $1.004.45 BLUEPRINTING M.0.7-12-89 106993 CONTROL DATA LOPP. $361-.13 INSTRUMENT PART IQ6994-�bDTItbL co .O EERARI'LACPAfFTS "--- ( = 106995 COOPER 3N OUSTRIESo INC. $1.825,982,60 ENGINES H.O.5-13-67.6-8-88. J-19A. .-+ 106996 COOK DINATEO EBUIP. CO., INCA l250J00 TRUER PARTS M_106997- "CO3FA RESTAOT . TRU A PAEi6T — _(' 106996 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC f652.86 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 106999 CNANETER $365.30 TRUCE PARTS :5dd-.Wv— LIA8lLTtFZU39 -- 107YB1 CAL WATER $287.404 RENTAL EQUIPMENT N 107002 LARRY CURTI TRUCK H .EQUIPMENT f23.94 O.00 SLUDGE REMOVAL H.O.4-13-88 - ___I07003- DXET"I' __ 137.73— VALVE PAETs---' ! a 107004 DE ANZA CORPORATION 6150.08 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 107005 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES 91.507.65 PRINTING --1876b�--"---01CC0'PATATCORP7+AV —3a1l-.33 -o"m EQUIPMENT--- '— ! 1070DI DUNN EDWARDS CORP: 1735.79 PAINT SUPPLIES 107008 U-VALS SALES $542.55 FITTINGS TMC. INSTRUMENT.._-______ 107619 ENSECO-CRL 12.350.90 OCEAN SAMPLING 107011 EASTMAN, INC. $818.56 OFFICE SUPPLIES -"_IO7U12- ____ELIISV4TERS�-ENGINEERTA�B-A'AACT 3ii3dd:dd UCEAN'RESCARCIr 107023 EFFECTIVE VISUAL IMAGERY $22.84 SLIDES 107014 ELECT AIR $466.18 MECRANICAL PARTS 1 D76I5___._____._ECEfTP.ORFF-d3L II1L INU-C O. 1366:90- SRAFT 107016 Ado SERVICE COMPANY $225.76 VALVE PARTS 147017 FACILITIES SUFPORT CO. $33.98 SMALL HARDWARE FAIERES_.___-__.___._' 1353.3E DEFERRED COMP-UFSTRIRTiTC6M- 1 107019 JOHN B. FALKENSTEIN P.C. $3,759.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 3-7-4. 3-20 I . . i FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/17/90 FAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AF93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY - ', . WARRANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT _DESCRIPTION ( i 107920 FARR SALES S SERVICE s8.580.00 FILTERS 107U2l FEDERAL EMPRESS CORP. $172.50 AIR FREIGHT i 107R42 FISL NER 6 DER Cp. 25.U8 INSTRUMENT PARTS ( • 107023 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. 1455.18 LAB SUPPLIES 107024 FLAT a VERTICAL CONCRETE $856.50 CONCRETE CUTTING 1 Ti D R5 FLUID TECH $141.21 SCRUBBER PART I- : IOTU26 FORD AEROSPACE A COHN. CORP. $19,941.54 REFUND USSR ME OVERPAYMENT 107V27 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA 3307.29 PHOTO SUPPLIES _ 107 T28 FOX_ENTERPRISES - $1,825.00 SAFE2Y CONSULTING 107029 FOXBORO CO. / NAG SYSTEMS S1r329.69 FITTINGS 107030 A.F. FREY -- $105.00 DEFERRED CORP DISTRIBUTION 141031 iF OSR�R6TNfr-R N6 SERVICES . 5199.61 VALVES f 107032 CITY OF FULLERTON $38.91 WATER USEAGE 107033 GTE EDUCATION SERVICES, INC. $98.61 ANSA BULLETIN BOARD 070E CANAHLLUMBER CO. $2 5.90 LONGER U 107035 GARDNER LITHOGRAPH. - $189.50 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT 107036 GENERAL CHEMICAL $7,898.00 CRENICALS 1 7G33 GENERAL TELEPHONECO. 9. 9 .97 TELEPHONE SERVICES InTO38 FLORENCE L. GERDES 9471.20 MEETING EXPENSE 107039 GIERLICx-MITCHELL. INC. $11,342.84 MECHANICAL PARTS X 6n DENUEST REFININS CO . FE 01 REFUND USER E OVERPAYMENT 1 m 2 107041 6RLAT' WESTERN RECLAMATION s3.500•00 STREET SWEEPING SERVICES 107092 DON, GREEK B ASSOCIATES s10.S18.00 SURVEYING SERVICES US 86-72 i TT9 EARLO L. GREER CO.. INT. .1.620.31 TRUCK PARTS MI 107044 HANSON-LORAN CHFRICAL CO. $3.210.55 REFUND USER PER OVERPAYMENT 107C45 FRED A. HARPER $1.495.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION IT71'ifi NA G N 7N S 1 9 VALVE PARTS W 101097 NATCM B KIRK. INC. 16.00 OL 15 ERCTN¢ PARTS 107098 HOER BIDER C.V.S. CALIF. b 'INCA s915.09 COMPRESSOR PARTS DTbA$- BD�i[6"6. AbflONtZFC s3oo.co DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION I • 107050 HOUSE OF BATTERIES $1.130.99 BATTERIES I•+T051 STEVEN J HOVEY l79.95 MEETING EXPENSE imp A.S. HUGHESSAPEWSUPPLIES 107053 CITY OF HUNTINGTON REACH $15.918.50 WATER USGGE 107054 HUNTINGTON SUPPLY $114.99 HARDWARE _ --iDTd55-' MCC-IN3THLIRH —;i:i5 UTTER REPAIRS 107056 TWA ENGINEERS $7.005.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-27-2 T 107A57 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL 179.361.51— _P¢BBIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-08-89 _ —1D7558--TRC"6f1-395TER$�I _15 35 EUGiNE PARTS ( 107059 INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS. INC. 574.38 ELECTRIC PARTS IC7060 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1,053.79 CONNECTORS —lO7B SI'-"—'-----IND RAM'-FA➢EP-- 12i T24:]5-- ie"rER ( T, 167362 INSIDE WASTE C/O CAP. REPOPTS 5255.00 SUBSCRIPTION 107063 INTERNATIONAL SENSOR TECH. 50.957.55 INSTRUMENT PARTS T,—ID7Obi-----"—IN4TNE-IEANCR'7iT ER�ISTR'Rl`-'--"'-'-- —(1'6:4i---- WATER USEABe--- ----- ( 107065 GAFAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP. :1.556.60 JANITORIAL SERVICES FUND I( 919R - Jl GIST WORKINP CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE S/17/90 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION UISTPICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ..—_ . .__.__...._..__.__._ ._...............—_. -MAIKA PA III'§bf23)VA-- Edit I" OA7t' b3123)sR'_...._..... _. . .. .._ . ..... ...._ _..... .............. i R WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 11,7066 A.I. JOHNSON COMPANY $97.26 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 107067 GERALD JONES $842.25 MEETING UPRISE 9 _JiT7TE 3TFTEF --uPPicE EDPPi381r—'—._._..—.___.._._. 107069 MALLELN.S COMPUTER SUPPLIES $410.91 COMPUTER PARTS , 107670 NAMAN BEARINGS R SUPPLY 943.29 FITTINGS §7..._.—. .—__.—____TOOLS 107072 NEEN-RUT ABRASIVE CO. $499.38 TOOLS 107073 KING BEARING, INC. f702.02 MECHANICAL PARTS f V 107075 MARTIN KORDICK. SR $2.475.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 1-14-1 107U76 H.Y. LAWHASTEP 6 CO., INC. S7.20q.50 SOIL TESTING �n_—i07b77--LEED3-E'-NbbTNRA�-- -�3f3.a�U INS'fSUNENP 6UPPLIBB-- _ -- --"�"'- ---"� I 10707E LIEDERT ASSOCIATES OF S67q.44 ELECTRIC PARTS 107079 WILLIAM J. LLOYD 589.25 MEETING EXPENSE --167bED---E6CEC-AZENTV— E3S6:S�uecb eEa---- -----'-- / 107061 LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION f140.620.37 POOLED EMISSIONS ESTIMATING PROGWI M.O. 12-13-89 . 107082 A.J. LYNCH CO, f1.2T6.02 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES _ dYa bS �AN3-NNtCYA�TA�---i3a6�.d-6— BE&VICE ACR8FH8HT -------------- _ 107684 MPS f80.54 PBOTOCRAPRIC SERVICES 1P7085 MALCOLM PIRNIE 9 INC. $2.733.97 ENGINEERING SERVICES ri m`-157d3d'---WAN PTVELEE�[bAT�— f52.85 11fS1'kI1MEMi BUPPLISS --------- r. X 107087 KETEMA 51.038.39 INSTRUMENT REPAIR + = 10708E MCNASTE.R-CARP SUPPLY CO. $752.71 BUILDING MATERIALS '� n�IBM rS4AEASGFEPFAq-T3NTROL SYS. INC. 207090 THOMAS R. MELTON $187.74 MILEAGE EXPENSE 1 197091 MICROAGE COMPUTER $5.213.69 OFFICE EQUIPMENT TV7b4T- lUtWWr_"'RVDTER STORES I 107093 MILLIPORE AND/OP WATERS 51.228.g4 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 107994 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL: INC. 1102.00 PUBLICATION __tdfP95NItAATC-b:TidbR�' ---T§31=dam_ —__.AEsiiNc-BRPPAR� 107096 MORGAN CRANE CO.. INC. $4,411.82 TRUCK PARTS 107097 MOTION INDUSTRIES. INC. $431.17 MOTORS .-91TYMLT-W�_'— —__. __SIS�b2 RAAIb3 107099 MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICES 480.38 INSTRUMENT REPAIR 107104 MULTEK9 INC. $954.93 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT Nin'091C-PL'ANT-MVI'try. IAi:—____---.IB'G6fv.3b ___.-.victim TRUCK-GERVYDE-._.__.__._. 107102 NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPLY $196.78 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES d 107103 NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION $500.00 DEPOSIT a 6 '_IN7i 2d ..—_—.277�bt-NTQPbKT"BEATN--.—.--. .�._;g.46_...._._--._—_..WATER ( 107105 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 476.0o REFUND USSR PEE OVRUAYNKST 107106 CHARLES NICHOLS $29.54 MEETING MERGE _.._.. ID71b7..___..__-_NddcAC-EDNTROLR: INCT. ..—____..... ____ ...._. . ._...i73b:2s_. _._ _._. - . . ARCNAMICAL IlARYb. .. ...... ..... ._.........__... .._..____. ' ( i 107100 UNITED NOTTINGHAM $31.80 FREIGHT 107109 O.M.S./SOLAG DISPOSAL CO 965.00 TRASH REMOVAL E77fU._____..__OCEUPATIUR3i"-VISTDN—bEdVIT[3-____._..___._.._ d 107111 ON-LINE ELECTRONICS 5112.10 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES as �� r FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST MORNING CAF ITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/17/90 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 • _ _ _____ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS P11O 00T2!//90 POSTING DATE 05123191 - WARRANT 00. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ! • 117112 ROBERT J. OOTEN $262.20 M m"a EXPENSE � 1!7113 ORANGE BEARING, INC. MCUANICAL PRLt78 j 1077IJ4 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY l315.55 ELECTRIC"SUPPLIES f • 107115 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY CO. $331.85 - LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 107116 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. $2.082.47 FITTINGS ' • v 10711 OSCAR•S LOON L SAFE 9 . 0 SEES . 107118 COUNTY SERVICE t2.29 8 B.70 SPECIALTY PROCESSING 107120 COUNTY OF GRANGE f3.10l.BO DATA UM ADVANCE SeRVICE3 107121 COUNT SELF-FUNDED MEDICAL INS t100r000.14 RE®HUN EWORSe f 101122 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT t6.975.00 IEFERRRRe PoRS8P8 - INSURANCE IOn22 BOBEAT L.SAFETY ON f7S.p0 SAFETY SUPPLIES CEL6R________,_____ 107123 PACIFIC SAFETY MAINTENANCE CO. 1S.2d136 SAFETY SUPPLIES ' 107125 PACIFIC SEVEN MAINTENANCE COOP fB.861.16 SAYER RIPe3 10712! PAN WEST t1 299.gq ]AX17D&I6L SRjPLT¢S ____„___ _ lOi 21 6 S7EVC P�LET R IP125T MEETING WAGES ! 107127 ROY PENDERGRAFT f445.00 DEFINING COMP DISTRIBUTION 107128 PHOTO 1 SOUND CO. - 41,151.45 OFFICE ¢QUIPM¢NT _"_____ 07129 YI LL IAN FIERCE $183.00 MEETING EXPENSE 107139 PIMA SRO SYSTEMS, INC. S44.243.47 SLUDGE R@IOVAL M.0.5-11-86 107131 PING YON $147.47 AS USER FEE OVERPAYMENT X 107I3= PLAINS TR EVA U R Y f251.SO MPINIAIE — ---" = 107133 POLYPURE• INC. $30.203.40 POLYMERS N.0.1-10-90.84-89 _107134 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. 1136L31 ELECTeI_C SUPPLIES b0 107135 P4ESENTATION PROOUGiS $199.58 OPPICE SUPPLIES ii 107136 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE S144.00 ICE 167137 F96FESSIONAL TANG ASSOCIATES $39.00 SUBSCRIPTION __ 107138 PROFESSIONAL TREE CAR $2.003.00 'Y11E8 E&10PA1. i 1 107139 THE PROJECTS SOLUTION CO. f4/399.90 INSTRUIRNTATION INSPECTION N.0.8-10418 167140 RADCLIFFE CONSULTING GRP fLO0.00 PUMP PARTS -----------R -- T13— ton 91 AI—NnOV--OISPDSIL co. --.-ii:07 _ 107142 RECYCr INC. ss9.900.60 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.1-11-88 107143 R.A. REED ELECTRIC 1503.25_ ELECTRIC MOTOR_ i 671 ft JEFFRET T. REED -f915.05 1¢e1'ixc E%PEN88 ' f _ I071t5 THE REGISTER $439.55 NOTICES A ADS 197196 REMEDY TEMP SI.339.59 TPMPOMRY AIRY CIS. " ---" 107157 "-7BE-TIE FUBLI�SUiP L�co. ---'--idoz:7s"--"`---"-iesTEuliexi•ENeeiies- "- ---- "__. F 107148 NEVES ENGINEERING CO. 11.652.1R MANROLE COVERS IC7149 RICHARDS, WATSON L GERSHON fir192.2] LEGAL SERVICES N.0.6-11-86 . _—io573e ---[i➢�£hEE aoob—_ . __..._.__�W.d9 s.MEETING Axe®n --"._____._____.__._____� 107151 ROYCE INSTRUMENT 61.131.23 INSTRUMENT PARTS r 167152 RUTAN 6 TUCKER 129.336.29 LEGAL SERVICES__Wf1ICN/NM7 i_UNIYBRBAL CIlCUI79_ , Miss- 1 -H - f 81 :1 CRATING f 10715 JOSEFH T. RTERSO 8 SON. AMC. S4 t/3719 PUMP PUT 107155 SAFE 7Y-NL[EN CORP. f132.80 PARTS CLPAHEL___ 1E72"56--3A AM L CIN C 0 OR �� -- "10Ii.0�—"------"ELECTRIC MOTOR r 107157 SANTA FE BAG CO. $36.01 FREIGHT f ■C J i FUND Non 1149 - JT+DISI WORMING CArITFL PROCESSING DATE 5/11194 PAGE 6 r ` REPORT PURGER AP43 __- COUNTY SARIIATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY r . _ r F . WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION :'. !' • 107150 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS 1NT•L SPl2.455.57 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-14-09 107159 SEA COAST DESIGNS S2.296.72 OFFICE FURNITURE r . .: —I➢77S0_—.._-SE7EA'i➢II7�['D-. DR-Al1ER71T._ ..... ..____-il TH77FB".""—._____.TODiS..... .__......._.___-__...-__.__ 107161 SHAMROCK SUPPLY 5616.81 SAFETY SUPPLIES 107162 SHARED LOGIC. INC. $225.00 REGISTRATION u9Ea-FB6 0viRPAriieMe ---"- r ( ii 10?364 CONSTANTINE SIRCELLO S15.391.10 DEFERRED CORM' PAY-OFF - 107165 SMITH-EMERY CO. 11.690.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89 I07396--- 3➢FT-VMMtfUSE- --E7H":L COMPUTER f 107167 SOIL AND TESTING ENGINEERS $246.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.6-14-89 107168 SOLAR TURBINES INC. S90.18 MIGHT ➢7Ib9 S➢'.--C➢RST7TR-OUELT�— --S7�096.5o zitCATION PBBS ------ / i 147179 SOUTH COAST DODGE S127.08 TRUCK PARTS 107171 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. $269.470.41 POWER is 07I72------------SU. GALIP. LUIbUN 10. MWER Elie¢EiOcAixox e - f 107273 50. CAL. GAS CO. 16.192.05 RATURAL GAS 207174 SQ. CALIF. UATER CO. - $90.65 WATER USEAGR 7775— S6UIWENH-C➢UFTOIL CO. sl;365.24DIESEL IVEL ------ ( 107176 SPARKLETTS DRINKI MG WATER $1.546.67 DRINKING WATER loll?? WESTALLOY INC. $2.295.17 WELDING SUPPLIES '0 TI7a SPINTArbTUCu., INC. Fe1cE su9eLlu ( 207179 STAR TOOL 8-SUPPLY CO. 1566:15 TODL9 107180 STERLING ART $41.59 GRAPHIC SUPPLIES IR7161--NTR .5a ImE ma ME-Se -/ 107152 SUMMIT STEEL $2.434.93 STEEL 107183 SUN-BELT LANDSCAPE 1 MAINT. $3.847.09 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEBPING M.0.8-9-89 —IV7IEi---BUR-E�LUTSIC-C 3�.➢ - TRBGE PART ( �jo 107389 SUNSET FORD S21.98 TRUCK PARTS 107186 CON7INEN7AL AIR TOOL, INC. 1E1171.66 TOOLS _ 1377E7--SORVEV0R3 nnr 3:214 07 -SAPE44 _ __—_- 1 10?184 TAYLOR-DUNN S106.25 TRUCK PARTS 107109 TEKMAR COMPANY $1.578.25 LAB SUPPLIES —'107190-"--�'➢IIRE�IDWERTISER'S id7 . ASSE9MENf'uS E Fee MAIL W-510T I 107193 TRAVEL TRAVEL $2,214,00 TRAVEL SERVICES M.0.6-14-87 107152 TRUCK 6 AUTO SUPPLY. INC. $543.65 TRUCK PARTS ".I07193"'__..._._.7:➢-TUCRER'TSON�'TIR._ _.____.•____..__—_____—_ 107194 TWINING LABORATORIES OF $7,193.25 BOIL TESTING M.0.6-14-89 207195 THE UNISGURCE CORP. $8,891.50 PAPER -I11719G' —UNTTEO'YARIr[C SERV --"-HJ64:19-- —PARCEL SEEVices---- ! 107197 PILLAR ELEVATOR COMPANY $326.15 SERVICE AGREEMENT 107198 VUR SCIENTIFIC $2,089.17 TAB SUPPLIES —107199..-------___VALTW-CORPORETTOR- "__.______..__....__.. -5553:97._.-_____._REGULATOR PART____— ._....._.___..__. -_ r 107200 VALLEY CITIES SUFFLY CO. 14.541.09 FITTINGS 107201 VARIAN INSTRUMENT GROUP 1693.25 LAI EQUIPMENT ➢72E2-.�-7TITIW6ZNDUSTNTAC_SUPFC7 .. ____l730�58 -BAPETY SUPPLiRE- ( 107293 LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES. INC. $6.921.14 CONSULTING SERVICES - CLEAN WATER GRANTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/17/90 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMOLP AP43 COUNIV SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ""-'- _ WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT _ _ DESCRIPTION _ 107204 MARK 0. VALTEN $190.00 MEETING MUSE 107205 _ WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 5239.06 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 107FD6 CRGC"GAflREF! <-� 52.59 _.$ INBUMNCE CLAIMS ADMENISTRATOR 107207 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL $56.75 PUBLICATION 107208 SANT 6.-1 INAM __ 5342.0E _MEETING UPENSE S7$u'T Jr. —fS6.4T REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 107210 VILLDAN ASSOCIATES $391.61 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-29 om 107211 ROURKE R WOODRUFF $46.296.19 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.6-4-89 $110.90 COPIER LEASES 107213 YELLOW SPRINGS INSTRUMENT CO. 1139.43 LAB REPAIRS 107214 VICTOR ZORZYNSKI 3600.27 METING EXPENSE Tif7Z3� RICHARD U. LUGAR S2110.0+0 DEFERRED COMP DISTINCTION ----------------- $5.6144844.53 ! SUMMARY ANOONT _ . t-0P81I'FUNU tK 02 OPER FUND 13,995,15 02 CAP PAC FUND 1,255,107.43 3-0P6R-FUND-- 13.91U.IU 05 OPER FUND 5,858.09 05 CAP PAC FUND 55,338.66 06-UPBR7FNNU- 1 07 OPEN FUND 13.883.96 07 CAP PAC FUND - 368,705.41 BII'OPERZ+UNU— - —B;SS3Ti7 — III CAP PAC FUND 16.76 013 OPER FUND 36.00 016.OEPR'PUNO— T,992:9 -- r 014 CAP PAC "No 4,207.47 05R6 OPEN FUND 993.14 --1566 CAP FAG FUND --T.174-30__._ _._...____________.__._ — 1 . 07614 OPEN FUND 769.40 3T OPER FUND 1,014,210.78 . COMP / - SELF MOM WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FUND 119.862.03 3T WORKING CAPITAL FUND 179.126.23 9 5,614.844.53 _._.. - . STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting on �_, 19 4 0 was duly posted for public inspection at the main lobby of the Districts - offices on 19g0 . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 6� day of 19 40. Rita J. Brown, Secret each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 of Orange County, California \.O